/i
z<
THE LIFE OF CHRIST
Jesus, the Christ.
THE
LIFE of CHRIST
By WILLIAM HANNA, D.D., LL.D
NEW AND ENLARGED EDITION
ESPECIALLY ARRANGED FOR BIBLE STUDENTS IN
TWENTY-FIVE OUTLINE STUDIES AND READING COURSES
CHARLES H; MORGAN, Ph.D.
AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY
150 NASSAU STREET - » - NEW YORK
3T3^S
Copyright, 1913
By AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY
/^&~&
'CJ.A354316
if*
* CONTENTS.
1 > PARTI.
I THE EAELIEE YEAES OF OITE LOE'D'S LIFE GXK EAETH.
Preface . page 7
I. The Annunciation — Mary and Elisabeth 13
II. The Nativity , 21
III. The Presentation in the Temple .'..' 31
IV. The Visit of the Magi 41
V. The Massacre of the Innocents, and the Plight into Egypt 51
VI. The Thirty Years at Nazareth — Christ among the Doctors 60
VII. The Forerunner . ! . 69
VIII. The Baptism 80
IX. The Temptation , 88
X. The First Disciples. 100Z>
XI. The First Miracle . 110
XII. The Cleansing of the Temple 121
XIII. The Conversation with Nicodemus 129Z>
XIV. The Woman of Samaria. 138
XV. The Jewish Nobleman and the Eoman Centurion 1495
XVI. The Pool of Bethesda 157
XVII. The Synagogue of Nazareth 166
XVIII. First Sabbath in Capernaum, and First Circuit of Galilee 174
PART II.
CHEIST'S MIJSTISTEY IN GALILEE.
I. The Two Healings — the Leper and the Paralytic 185
II. The Charge of Sabbath-Breaking 194
III. The Calling to the Apostolate of St. Peter, St. Andrew, St. Jnmes,
St. John, and St. Matthew 204
I CONTENTS.
IV. The Sermon on the Mount 2136
V. The Eaising of the Widow's Son and the Euler's Daughter 2216
VI. The Embassy of the Baptist — the Great Invitation 230
VII. The Woman who was a Sinner 243
VIII. The Collision with the Pharisees — the First Parables — the Stilling
of the Tempest — the Demoniac of Gadara 250
IX. The Mission of the Twelve 268
X. The Feeding of the Five Thousand, and the Walking upon the Water 277
XI. The Discourse in the Synagogue of Capernaum 285
XII. Pharisaic Traditions — the Syro-Phcenician Woman 2966
XIII. The Circuit through Decapolis 304
XIV. The Apostolic Confession at Caesarea-Philippi 312
XV. The Eebuke of St. Peter 320
XVI. The Transfiguration 329
Note 337
M
PART III.
THE CLOSE OF CHRIST'S MINISTRY.
I. The Descent of the Mount of Transfiguration 341
II. The- Payment of the Tribute-Money — -the Strife as to Who should be
Greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven 350
III. Christ and his Brethren 357
IV. Christ at the Feast of Tabernacles 365
V. Jesus the Light of the World, 373
VI. The Cure of the Man Born Blind 3816
VII. The Good Shepherd 390
VIII. Incidents in our Lord 's Last Journey to Jerusalem 403
IX. Our Lord's Ministry in Peraea, east of the Jordan 411
X. The Parables of the Peraean Ministry 421
XL The Good Samaritan 431
XII. The Lord's Prayer 439
XIII. Jesus the Eesurrection and the Life 4476
XIV. The Eaising of Lazarus 457
XV. The Last Journey through Persea: the Ten Lepers — the Coming of
the Kingdom — the Question of Divorce — Little Children brought
to Him — the Young Euler 4666
XVI. Jesus at Jericho — the Eequest of the Sons of Zebedee 475
XVIL The Anointing at Bethany 484
CONTENTS. 7
PART IV.
THE PASSION WEEK.
I. The Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem 493
II. The Fig-Tree Withering away — The Second Cleansing of the Temple, 500
III. The Barren Fig-Tree — Parables of the Two Sons and of the Wicked
Husbandmen 508
IV. The Marriage of the King's Son — Question as to the Tribute-Money 516
V. Question of the Sadducees as to the Resurrection of the Dead 526
VI. The Lawyer's Question — the Two Great Commandments — Christ is
David 's Son and David 's Lord 534
VII. The Woes denounced upon the Pharisees 541
VIII. The Widow 's Mite — Certain Greeks desire to see Jesus 547
IX. The Prophecies of the Mount 556&
X. The Prophecies of the Mount 564
XI. The Parable of the Ten Virgins 570
XII. The Parable of the Talents 579
XIII. The Day of Judgment 588
XIV. The Day of Judgment 596
XV. The Washing of the Disciples ' Feet 603&
XVI. The Exposure of Judas 611
XVII. The Lord 's Supper 622
XVIII. Gethsemane 631
■ M
PART V.
THE LAST DAY OF OUK LOKD'S PASSION.
I. The Betrayal and the Betrayer 643
II. The Denials, Repentance, and Restoration of St. Peter 653
III. The Trial before the Sanhedrim 663
IV. Christ 's First Appearance before Pilate 6725
V. Christ 's Appearance before Herod 681
VI. Christ 's Second Appearance before Pilate 690
VII. The Daughters of Jerusalem Weeping 7015
VIII. The Penitent Thief 711
IX. The Mother of our Lord 723
X. The Darkness and the Desertion 733
3 CONTENTS.
XL "It is Finished" 741
XII. The Attendant Miracles 749
XIII. The Physical Cause of the Death of Christ 759
XIV. The Burial 769
: M
PART VI.
THE FOETY DAYS AFTEE OUE LOED'S EESITEEECTIOK
I. The Eesurrection 777
II. Appearance to Mary Magdalene 786
III. The Journey to Emmaus 791
IV. The Evening Meeting 802
V. The Incredulity of Thomas 811
VI. The Lake-Side of Galilee 820
VII. Peter and John 827
VIII. The Great Commission 836
IX. The Ascension 853
OUTLINE STUDIES.
THE ENTIRE CONTENTS OF THIS VOLUME OUTLINED IN TWENTY-FIVE
STUDIES WITH EXPLANATORY SECTIONS.
BY
Rev. CHARLES HERBERT MORGAN, Ph.D.,
Author of " Studies in the Life of Christ," " Studies in the Old Testament,"
"The Scholars' Bible," etc.
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT.
Bible study is constantly growing in range and variety. Espe-
cially are simple courses needed by pastors and leaders in young people's
organizations, men's brotherhoods, women's societies, for the mid-
week service, to follow revival meetings, and at other times.
Courses upon other portions of the Bible cannot compare in general
usefulness with a course upon the Gospels and the Life of Christ.
This course of twenty-five Studies has been specially prepared for
this new edition of Dr. Hanna's "Life of Christ," and offers the
advantage of an outline plan resting upon a single volume, instead of
the confusion which often results from almost a library of reference
books. It will be seen by a glance at the six Parts of this Outline, that
Dr. Hanna's " Life of Christ" conforms in plan to the latest and most
scientific arrangement of Life of Christ courses.
There are three features that mark off these later methods of
arranging the Life of Christ in an orderly manner from the earlier
plans.
In the first place, the dominant idea now in viewing the Life of our
Lord is his Ministry, instead of the mechanical classification by years
which was formerly used.
In the second place, the Ministry of our Lord is viewed from the
standpoints of the Preparation made for it and of the several Provinces
in which, in the main, it was successively accomplished.
In the third place, all the recent improved plans of arranging our
Lord's Life give a very prominent place to the Passion Week.
As the Outline which follows is examined, it will be evident how
fully these three features are represented.
10 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
PART I. PREPARATION AND EARLY MINISTRY.
Study 1. Birth and Infancy.
(1) Coming of the Divine Redeemer attended by the service of angelic
messengers 13~15
(2) Mary the Mother of Jesus 15-21
a. Promise made to her 15, 16
b. Her unquestioning faith 16-18
c. Her visit to Elisabeth. . ; 19, 20
d. Her hymn of praise 20, 21
(3) The Nativity 21-31
a. Divine ordering as to place 21, 22
b. Determination as to time 23-25
c. Meeting-place of lowliness and majesty 26-31
(4) Presentation in the temple 31-40
a. Preceded by circumcision 31, 32
b. Meaning of the presentation 32-36
c. Utterances of Simeon and Anna 36-40
(5) Visit of the Magi 41-50
a. Character of these visitors 41, 42
b. Sign which guided them 43, 44, 46-48
c. Policy of Herod 44, 45
d. Magi's gifts, worship, and home-going 49, 50*
(6) Massacre of the innocents 51-59
a. Three New Testament Herods 51
b. Character of Herod the Great 51-53
c. He orders children slain at Bethlehem 53-55
d. Scripture allusion to Rachel explained i 58, 59
(7) Flight into Egypt and return to Nazareth 55-57
\
OUTLINE STUDIES. 11
OUTLINE STUDIES.
When this course of Outline Studies is taken up by a leader or a
student, it will be helpful first of all to form an idea of its general direc-
tion.
Christ's life has as its earthly setting the land of Palestine — a
small country in extent, being only about 140 miles from north to
south and 80 miles from west to east. Its two chief fields of interest,
as respects our Lord's life, are the Province of Galilee in the north,
especially that part of it connected with the west shore of the Sea of
Galilee, and the Province of Judea in the south, with its life centering
in the capital city Jerusalem.
All of Christ's childhood, youth, and early manhood up to thirty
w T as passed in the little village of Nazareth, in the southern part of
Galilee, except the visit to Jerusalem at the age of twelve. He was
simply looked upon as a humble Galilean peasant, a carpenter following
the trade of Joseph, and perhaps, after the death of the latter, the head
and main support of the family.
When his public work began, though he early presented himself in
Judea at Jerusalem and in the very courts of the temple, he w r on no
large following. Yet on this trip he had two wonderful personal
interviews. It was, however, among the warm-hearted Galileans where
he had been brought up that he was first able to attract the multitudes
to his ministry. This general view carries us to the end of Part I.
As we now turn to Study 1, we see that in the advent into our world
of One who has worked so profoundly that all standards of influence
have had to be revised in order to measure the place which he holds,
the presence of the supernatural can awaken no surprise. The present
Study reveals the birth of Christ as preceded by angelic assurance to
Mary that she is to be the mother of the Redeemer. God has prov-
identially determined the place and the time of the nativity, and the
humble scenes at Bethlehem form the true and right prelude to the
inauguration of the empire of self-sacrificing love. The nativity is
followed by the presentation in the temple, the visit of the Magi,
the massacre of the innocents, the flight into Egypt, and the return to
Nazareth.
By reference to the foot-notes of the pages covered by this Study,
it wall be seen that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke are the ones
that almost wholly treat of the nativity and infancy of Christ. Luke
largely comes first in order, presenting the events that lead up to and
attend the birth of Christ; Matthew then chiefly carries forward the
account of Christ's infancy. The outline of the Study is now given.
12 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
PARTS AND STUDY TITLES.
Part I. Preparation and Early Ministry.
STUDY PAGE
1 . Birth and Infancy 12c
2. Growth and Preparation 59a
3. First Disciples and Manifested Power 100a
4. Two Wonderful Interviews 129a
5. First Public Cures and Discourses . 149a
Part II. Main Ministry in Galilee.
6. Special Cases and Controversies and First Apostles 184
7. Sermon on the Mount 213
8. More Miracles and Beginning of Parables . . . . 221a
9. Climax of Public Ministry 267a
10. Training Work with the Apostles 269a
Part III. Main Ministry in Judea and Per^a.
11. Lessons Culminating at the Feast of Tabernacles 340
12. Further Works and Words o f Grace at Jerusalem 381
13. First Period of Peraean Ministry 402a
14. Supreme Miracle of the Raising of Lazarus . 447
15. Second Period of Peraean Ministry and Arrival at Bethany 4G6
Part IV. Passion Week to Getksemane.
16. Triumphal Entry and Day of Authority 492
17. Days of Conflict and Retirement 507a
18. Prophetic Instructions to the Apostles 556
19. Last Supper and Gethsemane : 603
Part V. Passion Week to the Burial.
20. Betrayal and Trial before the Sanhedrim 642
21. Trials before Pilate and Herod 672«
22. Crucifixion and Burial 701
Part VI. Forty Days and the Ascension.
23. Resurrection and First Appearances in Judea 776a
24. Appearances in Galilee 819a
25. Final Appearances at Jerusalem and Ascension 852
THE
LIFE OF CHRIST.
THE EARLIER YEARS OF OUR LORD'S LIFE ON
EARTH.
The Annunciation — Mary and Elisabeth.*
"In the sixth month" — half a year from the time when, within the
holy place at Jerusalem, he had stood on the right side of the altar
of incense, and announced to the incredulous Zacharias the birth of
the Baptist — the angel Gabriel was sent to an obscure Galilean vil-
lage to announce a still greater birth — that of the Divine Redeemer
of mankind. As we open, then, the first page in the history of our
Lord's earthly life, we come at once into contact with the supernatural.
The spirit-world unfolds itself; some of its highest inhabitants become
palpable to sense, and are seen to take part in human affairs. In the
old patriarchal and prophetic ages angels frequently appeared, con-
versing with Abraham and Hagar, and Lot and Jacob; instructing
in their ignorance, or comforting in their distress, or strengthening
in their weakness, Joshua and Gideon, and Elijah and Daniel and
Zechariah. Excluding, however, those instances in which it was the
Angel of the Covenant who appeared, the cases of angelic manifesta-
tion were comparatively rare, and lie very thinly scattered over the
four thousand years which preceded the birth of Christ. Within the
half century that embraced this life we have more instances of angelic
interposition than in all the foregoing centuries of the world's history.
At its opening and at its close angels appear as taking a special
interest in events which had little of outward mark to distinguish
*Luke 1:26-56.
14 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
them. Gabriel announces to Zacharias the birth of John, to Marj
the birth of Jesus. An angel warns Joseph in a dream to take the
young child down to Egypt. On the night of the great birth, and for
the first time on earth, a multitude of the heavenly host; is seen. In
the garden of Gethsemane, an angel comes to strengthen our Lord in
his great agony. On the morning of the resurrection, angels appear,
now sitting, now standing, within and without the sepulchre, '-is if
they thronged around the place where the body of the Lord had laiu
When from the top of Olivet the cloud carried the rising Jesus out
of the apostles' sight, two angels stand beside the apostles as they
gaze so steadfastly up into the heavens, and foretell his second coming.
Nor do they withdraw from human sight when the ministry of our
Lord has closed. Mingling with the other miraculous agency where-
by the kingdom of Christ was established and extended, theirs
appears. An angel releases Peter, commissions Philip, instructs
Cornelius, smites Herod, stands amid the terrors of the shipwreck
before Paul.
Is there aught incredible in this ? If there be indeed a world of
spirits, and in that world Christ fills the place our faith attributes to
him ; if in that world there be an innumerable company of angels ; if
the great design of our Lord's visit to this earth was to redeem out
sinful race to God, and unite us with the unfallen members of his
great family, then it was not unnatural that those who had worship-
ped around his throne should bend in wonder over his cradle, stand
by his side in his deep agony, roll away the stone rejoicing from his
sepulchre, and attend him as the everlasting doors were lifted up,
when, triumphant over death and hell, he resumed his place in the
eternal throne. When the Father brought his First-begotten into the
world, the edict was, "Let all the angels of God worship him." Shall
we wonder, then, that this worship, in one or two of its acts, should
be made manifest to human vision, as if to tell us what an interest
the incarnation excited, if not in the minds of men, in another and
higher branch of the great community of spirits? From the begin-
ning angels were interested spectators of what transpired on earth.
When under the moulding hand of the Great Creator the present
economy of material things was spread forth — so good, so beautiful —
they sang together, they shouted for joy. When sin and death made
their dark entrance, angels stood by, hailing the first beams of light
that fell upon the darkness, welcoming the first human spirit that
made its way into the heavenly mansions. The slow development of
the divine purposes of mercy in the history of human redemption
they watched with eager eye. Still closer to our earth they gathered,
MARY AND ELISABETH. 15
still more earnest was their gaze as the Son of the Eternal prepared
to leave the glory he had with the Father, that he might come down
and tabernacle as a man among us. And when the great event of his
incarnation at last took place, it looked for a short season as if they
were to mingle visibly in the affairs of men, and of that new kingdom
which the Ancient of Days set up. It was the Son of God who
brought these good angels down along with him. He has mediated
not only between us and the Father, but between us and that elder
branch of the great commonwealth of spirits, securing their services
for us here, preparing us for their society hereafter. He has taught
them to see in us that seed out of which the places left vacant by the
first revolt in heaven are to be filled. He has taught us to see in
them our elder brethren, to a closer and eternal fellowship with whom
we are hereafter to be elevated. Already the interchange of kindly
offices has commenced. Though since he himself has gone they have
withdrawn from human vision, they have not withdrawn from earthly
service under the Redeemer. Are they not all ministering spirits
sent forth to minister to them who shall be heirs of salvation? Who
shall recount to us wherein that gracious ministry of theirs consists;
who shall prove it to be a fancy, that as they waited to bear away
the spirit of Lazarus to Abraham's bosom, they hoverjround the
death-bed of the believer still, the tread of their footstep, the stroke
of their wing unheard as they waft the departing spirit to its eternal
home?
" The angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee,
named Nazareth, to a virgin espoused to a man, whose name was
Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary."
Little information is given in the gospels as to the previous history
either of Joseph or Mary. He, we are told, was of the house of
David, of royal lineage by direct descent; but that line now fallen
so low that he was but a village mechanic, a carpenter. Mary, too,
we have reason to believe, was also of the royal stock of David; yet
in so humble a condition of life as made it natural that she should be
betrothed to Joseph. This betrothal had taken place, and the new
hopes it had excited agitate the youthful Mary's heart. She is alone
in her dwelling, when, lifting up her eyes, she sees the form of the
angel, and hears his voice say unto her: " Hail, thou that art highly
favored, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women." To
Zacharias he had spoken at once by name, and had proceeded with-
out prelude to deliver the message with which he had been charged.
He enters more reverently this humble abode at Nazareth than he had
entered the holy place of the great temple at Jerusalem. He stands
16 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
more leverently before this youthful maiden than before the aged
priest. He cannot open to her his message till he has offered her
such liomage as heavenly messenger never paid to any member of our
race. Is it any wonder that saluted so by one who, wearing, as in
all likelihood he did, our human form, was yet like no man she had
ever seen, Mary should have been "troubled at his saying;" troubled
as she felt the privacy of her seclusion thus invaded, and looked upon
that strange, unearthly, yet most attractive form which stood before
her ? She is not so troubled however as to hinder her from casting
in her thoughts " what manner of salutation this should be." She
receives the salutation in silence, with surprise, with awe, with
thoughtful wonder. In sympathy with feelings depicted in her alarm-
ed yet inquiring countenance, Gabriel hastens to relieve her fears
and satisfy her curiosity. "Fear not," he says, after a brief pause
"Fear not, Mary;" the very familiar mention of her name carrying
with it an antidote against alarm. " Fear not, Mary ; for thou hast
found favor with God. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb,
and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus. He shall be
great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest ; and the Lord God
shall give unto him the throne of his father David : and he shall reign
over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be
no end."
There was scarce a woman in Israel, in those days, who did not
cherish it as the very highest object of desire and ambition to be the
mother of the promised Messiah. Mary was a woman in Judah, and
the man to whom she was betrothed belonged also to that stock from
which the Messiah was to spring. Perhaps the hope had already
dawned that this great honor might be in store for her. Her devout
and thoughtful habits had made her familiar with the old prophecies
that foretold the Messiah's advent, and with the manner in which his
kingdom was there spoken of. Obscure and mysterious as much of
what Gabriel said may have appeared to her, she seems at once to
have apprehended that it was of the birth of this great Son of David
that he was speaking. She does not ask, she seems not to have
needed any information on that point. Nor does she hesitate to ac-
cept as true all that Gabriel had declared. She puts indeed a ques-
tion which, if its meaning had not been interpreted by the manner in
which Gabriel dealt with it, and by the subsequent conduct of Mary
herself, we might have regarded as akin to that of Zacharias; as
indicating that she too had given way to incredulity. But hers was
a question of curiosity not of unbelief; a question akin, not to the
one which Zacharias put about the birth of John, but to that of
MART AND ELISABETH. 17
Abraham about the birth of Isaac, when he said to the angel, "Where-
by shall I know this ?" a question implying no failure of faith, for we
know that Abraham staggered not at the promise through unbelief)
but expressive simply of a desire for further information, for some
sign in confirmation of his faith. He got such a sign and rejoiced.
And so with Mary: her question, like the patriarch's, springing not
from the spirit of a hesitating unbelief, but from natural curiosity,
and the wish to have the faith she felt confirmed. Her desire was
granted. She was told that the Holy Ghost should come upon her,
that the power of the Highest should overshadow her, that the child
afterwards to be born was now miraculously to be conceived. And
as a sign, this piece of information, new to her we may believe, was
given, that her relative, the aged Elisabeth, was also to have a son.
Her question having been answered, and the manner of the great
event so far revealed as to throw her back simply on the promise and
power of God, Mary says: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it
unto me according to thy word." What a contrast here between
Zacharias and Mary! The aged priest had been taught from child-
hood in one of the schools of the prophets, and must have been
familiar with all those narratives and prophecies which might have
prepared him to believe, and he had besides the experience of years
to give power to his trust in God. Mary was of humbler parentage ;
her opportunities of instruction but meagre compared with his; hers
too was the season of inexperienced youth ; her faith was as yet un-
fortified by trial. What he was asked to believe was unlikely indeed,
and altogether unlooked for, yet not beyond the power of nature.
What she is asked to believe is a direct miraculous forthputting of the
great power of God. Yet the old priest staggers, while the young
maiden instantly confides.
In Mary's immediate and entire belief of the angel's word, a far
greater confidence in God was shown than could have been shown by
Zacharias, even had he received Gabriel's message as she did, with-
out a suspicion or a doubt. She who, being betrothed, proved un-
faithful, was, by the law of Moses, sentenced to be stoned to death;
and though that law had now fallen into disuse, or was but seldom
literally executed, yet she who was deemed guilty of such a crime
stood exposed to the loss of character, and became the marked object
of public opprobrium. Mary could not fail at once to perceive, and
to be sensitive to the misconceptions and the perils which she would
certainly incur. She might, in self-vindication, relate what Gabriel
had told her, but how many would believe her word? What voucher
could she give that it was actually a heavenly messenger she had
Life of Christ. 2
18 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
seen, and that what he had said was true? Many a distressing feaj
as to the future — as to the treatment she might receive from Joseph
the calumnies, the shame, the scorn to which from other quarters shf
inight be exposed — might have arisen, if not to check her faith, yet
to hold her own acquiescence in the will of God in timid and trem
bling suspense ; but, strong in the simplicity and fulness of her trust
she puts all fears away, and committing herself into the hands of him
whose angel she believes Gabriel to be, she says, " Behold the hand-
maid of the Lord ; be it unto me according to thy word."
Let us notice one other element in Mary's faith : its humility, its
complete freedom from that undue thought of self which so often
taints the faith of the most believing. Wonderful as the announce-
ment is, that a child born of her should, by such miraculous concep-
tion as Gabriel had spoken of, be the Son of the Highest, should be
a king sitting on the throne of David — his kingdom one that should
outrival David's, of which there never should be an end — Mary har-
bors no doubt, raises no question, thinks not, speaks not of her own
unworthiness to have such honor conferred on her, or of her unfit-
ness to be the mother of such a child. As if one so unworthy of the
least of God's mercies had no right or title to question his doings,
however great a gift it pleased him to confer, she sinks all thought
of self in thought of him, and says, "Behold the handmaid of the
Lord; be it unto me according to thy word." A finer instance of
simple, humble, childlike, unbroken trust, we shall scarcely find in
any record human or divine. "Blessed," let us say with her cousin
Elisabeth, "is she that believed: for there shall be a performance of
those things which were told her from the Lord." " Thou hast found
favor," said Gabriel to her, " with God." It is possible to interpret
that saying without any reference to Mary's character ; to rest in the
explanation, which is no doubt so far true, that it was God's good
pleasure to select out of all the maidens of Israel this Mary of Naza-
reth, to be the most honored of the daughters of Eve. But if it be
true, as we are elsewhere taught, that to him that hath it is given;
that it is done unto every one according to his faith ; that to him that
believeth, all things are possible; if all the recorded experience of
God's people confirms these general sayings of the divine word — are
we wrong in considering the high honor conferred by God on Mary
as a striking exemplification of the principle of adapting the gift to
the character and capacity of the receiver?
His errand accomplished, Gabriel withdrew; and after the brief
and exciting interview, Mary was left in solitude to her own thoughts.
The words she had so lately heard kept ringing in her ears. She
MARY AND ELISABETH. 19
tried to enter more and more into their meaning. As she did so, into
what a tumult of wonder, and awe, and hope, must she have been
thrown! She longs for some one with whom she can converse, td
whom she may unburden her full mind and heart. There is no one
ioar to whom she can or dare lay open all her secret thoughts; but
she remembers now what Gabriel had told her about her kinswoman
Elisabeth, who may well be intrusted with the secret, for she too has
been placed in something like the same condition. Eager for sym-
pathy, thirsting for companionship and full communion of the heart,
she arises in haste, and departs for the distant residence of her cousin,
who lives amid the far-off hills of Judah. It is a long — for one so
young and so unprotected, it might be a perilous journey ; nearly the
whole length of the land — at least a hundred miles to traverse. But
what is distance, what are dangers" to one so lifted up with the exalted
hopes to which she has been begotten ! The hundred miles are quickly
trodden ; joy and hope make the long distance short. She reaches
at last the house in which Elisabeth resides, and, with all due respect —
such as is due from the inferior in station, the junior in years — she
Balutes the wife of the venerable priest. How filled with wonder
must she have been, when, instead of the ordinary return to her sal-
utation, Elisabeth breaks forth at once with the exclamation, " Blessed
art thou among women;" the very words which the angel had so
lately spoken in her astonished ear; "blessed is the fruit of thy
womb." She need not tell her secret ; it is already known. What a
fresh warrant this for the truth of all that Gabriel had said ! It comes
to confirm a faith already strong, but which might, perhaps, other-
wise have begun to falter. It did not waver in the angel's presence ;
but had month after month gone by, with no one near to share her
thoughts or build her up in her first trust, might not that trust have
yielded to human weakness and shown some symptom of decay?
Well-timed, then, the kindly aid which the strange greeting of hei
cousin brought with it, supplying a new evidence that there should
indeed be a performance of all those things which were told her of
the Lord.
" And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should
come to me?" If in Mary we have one of the rarest exhibitions of
humility towards God, of entire acquiescence in his will, in Elisabeth
we have as rare and beautiful an instance of humility towards others,
the entire absence of all selfish, proud, and envious feelings. Elisabeth
leaves out of sight all the outer distinctions between herself and her
bumble relative, forgets the difference of age and rank, recognises at
once, and ungrudgingly, the far higher distinction which had boeD
SO THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
conferred by God upon Mary, and wonders even at the fact that to
such a home as hers the honored mother of her Lord should come.
But now the same spirit which had enlightened her eyes, and filled
her heart, and opened her lips to give such a greeting to her cousin,
comes in still fuller measure upon Mary, and to the wonderful saluta-
tion she gives the still more wonderful response in that strain of rapt
and rhythmical praise which the holy catholic church has ever treas-
ured as the first and fullest of our Christian hymns.
It divides itself into two parts. Rising at once to God as the
source of all her blessings, her soul and all that was within her being
stirred up to bless him, she celebrates, in lofty strains of praise, the
Lord's goodness to herself individually. " My soul doth magnify the
Lord." The Lord had magnified her, by his goodness had made her
great, and she will magnify the Lord. The larger his gift to her, the
larger the glory she will render to his great name. " My spirit hath
rejoiced in God my Saviour." She hails the coming Saviour, as one
needed by her as by all sinners, and embraces him, though her own
son according to the flesh, as her God and Saviour ; glorying more in
the connection that she has with him in common with the entire mul-
titude of the redeemed, than in that special maternal relationship in
which she has the privilege to stand to him. Royal though her line-
age, hers had been a low estate; her family poor in Judah; she
among the least in her father's house ; but in his great grace and in-
finite condescension the Lord had stooped to raise her from the dust,
to set her upon a pinnacle of honor, and gratefully and gladly will
she acknowledge the hand that did it. "For he hath regarded the
low estate of his handmaiden." And how high had he exalted her!
The angel had called her blessed at Nazareth. Elisabeth, in the city
of Judah, had repeated his saying ; but Mary herself rises to the full
conception and full acknowledgment of the honor the Lord had put
upon her: "For, behold," she says, "from henceforth, all generations
dhall call me blessed." But it fills her with no pride, it prompts to
no undue familiarity with God, or with his great name. She knows
to whom to attribute this and every other gift and grace, and in tne
fulness of a devout and grateful reverence, she adds: "He that w
mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name."
So much about herself and all that the Lord had done for her;
but now she widens the embrace of her thanksgiving and praise, and
losing all sense of her individuality, her virgin lips are touched with
fire, and as poetess and prophetess of the infant church she pours
forth the first triumphal song which portrays the general character oi
the gospel kingdom then to be ushered in.
THE NATIVITY. 2l
In these strains there breathed the spirit at once of the Baptist
and of Christ ; of the two children of the two mothers who stood now
face to face saluting one another. It is the voice of him who cried in
the wilderness, " Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in
ih 3 desert a highway for our God : every valley shall be exalted, and
every hill shall be made low; and the crooked shall be made straight,
and the rough places plain ; and the glory of the Lord shall be n>-
vealed." It is the voice of him who opened his mouth on the moun-
tain side of Galilee, and said, "Blessed are the poor in spirit: for
theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are the meek: for they
shall inherit the earth. Blessed are they which do hunger and thirst
after righteousness: for they shall be filled." Do we not recognise
the very spirit of the ministries both of John and of Jesus in the words •
"He hath showed strength with his ami: he hath scattered the proud
in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty
from their seats, and exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the
hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away.
He hath holpen his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy ; as
he spake to our fathers, to Abraham, and to his seed for ever."
II.
The Nativity.
It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to decide whether it was before
or after her visit to Elisabeth, that Joseph was made acquainted with
the condition of his betrothed. It must have thrown him into pain-
fid perplexity. He was not prepared at first to put implicit faith in
her narrative, but neither was he prepared utterly to discredit it.
To put her publicly away by a bill of divorce would have openly
stamped her character with shame, and branded her child with infa-
my. He was unwilling that either of these injuries should be inflict-
ed. To put her away privily would at least so far cover her reputa-
tion that the child might still be regarded as his; and this he had
generously resolved to do, when the angel of the Lord appeared to
him hi a dream, removed all his doubts, and led him to take Mary as
his wife. This difficulty overcome, Mary was quietly awaiting at
Nazareth the expected birth. But it was not at Nazareth that the
Messiah was to be born. An ancient prophecy had already designated
another village, not in Galilee, but in Judea, as the destined birth'
• Luke 2 : 1-20.
22 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
place. " But thou, Bethleheni Ephratah" — so had the prophet Micah
spoken seven hundred years before — "though thou be little among
the thousands of Judah, jet out of thee shall he come forth unto me
that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of
old, from everlasting." To this village of Bethlehem Mary was fcc
be guided at such a time as should secure the fulfilment of the
prophecy.
A singular instrumentality was employed to gain this end. The
Roman empire had now stretched its dominion to its widest limits,
its power extending from the Euphrates to the British islands — from
the Northern ocean to the borders of Ethiopia. Amid the prevalence
of universal peace, the emperor, judging it a fit opportunity to ascer-
tain by accurate statistics the population and resources of the different
provinces of his dominions, issued an edict that a general census of
the empire should be taken. It gratified his pride ; it would be use-
ful afterwards for many purposes of government, such as determining
the taxes that might be imposed, or the levies that might be drawn
from the different provinces. This edict of Augustus came to be
executed in Judea. That country was not yet, in the outward form
of its government, reduced to the condition of a Roman province ; but
Herod, while nominally an independent king, was virtually a Roinar
subject, and had to obey this as well as the other edicts of the em-
peror. In doing so, however, Herod followed the Jewish usage, and
issued his instructions that every family should repair forthwith to
the seat of his tribe, where its genealogical records were kept. The
distinction of inheritance among the Jews had long been lost, but the
listinction of families and tribes were still preserved, and Herod
grounded upon that distinction the prescribed mode of registration
or enrolment. Joseph and Mary, being both of the house and lineage
of David, were obliged to repair to Bethlehem.
The manner in which the power of the Roman empire was thus
employed to determine the birthplace of our Lord, naturally invites
us to reflect upon the singular conjunction of outward circumstances,
the strange timing of events that then took place. Embracing the
whole sphere of reflection which thus opens to our view, let us, before
fixing our attention upon the incidents of the particular nairative now
before us, dwell for a little on the Divine wisdom that was displayed
in fixing upon that particular epoch in the world's history as the one
in which Jesus was born, and lived, and died. "When," says the
inspired apostle, " the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth
his Son, made of a woman, made under the law." The expression
used here, " the fulness of the time." evidently implies not only that
THE NATIVIT1. 23
there was a set time appointed beforehand of the Father, but that a
series of preparatory steps were prearranged, the accomplishment of
which had, as it were, to be waited for, ere the season best suited for
the earthly advent of our Lord arrived. Some peculiar fitness must
Ihen have marked the time of Christ's appearance in this world. We
are inclined to wonder that his appearance should have been so long
delayed. Looking at all the mighty issues that hung suspended on
his advent, we are apt at times to be surprised that so many thousand
years should have been suffered to elapse ere the Son of God came
down to save us; and yet, could the whole plan and counsels of the
Deity be laid open to our eye, we cannot but believe that as there
were the best and weightiest reasons why his coming should be defer-
red so long, there were also the best and weightiest reasons why it
should be deferred no longer. To attempt on either side the state-
ment of these reasons would be to attempt to penetrate within the
veil that hides from us the secret things of God. Taking up, however,
the history of the world as it is actually before us, it can neither be
unsafe nor presumptuous to consider the actual and obvious benefits
which have attended the coming of the Saviour at that particular
period when it happened.
In the first place, we can readily enough perceive that it hag
served greatly to enhance the number and the force of the evidences
in favor of the Divine origin and authority of his mission. Two of
the chief outer pillars upon which the fabric of Christianity as a rev-
elation from Heaven rests, are prophecy and miracles. But if Christ
had come in the earliest ages ; had the Incarnation followed quickly
upon the Fall, so far as that coming was concerned there had been
no room or scope for prophecy — one great branch of the Christian
evidences had been cut off. As it now is, when we take up that long
line of predictions, extending over more than three thousand years,
from the first dim intimation that the seed of the woman should bruise
the head of the serpent, down to the last prophecy of Malachi, that
the Lord, whom the Jews sought, should come suddenly to his temple
as the Messenger of the Covenant, whom they delighted in ; when we
mark the growing brightness and fulness that characterize each suc-
ceeding prediction, as feature after feature in the life and character of
the great Messiah is added to the picture; when we compare the
actual events with the passages in those ancient writings, in which
they were repeatedly foretold, what a strong confirmation is given
thereby to our faith, that He, of whom all those things had been
spoken so long beforehand, was indeed the Christ, the Son of the
living God. How much, then, in regard to prophecy, should we have
24 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
lost, had the interval between the Fall and the Incarnation not been
long enough for that wonderful series of prophecies to be interposed
Even as to the miracles we should have been put to great and se*
rious disadvantage. Our faith in the reality of these miracles rests
upon human testimony. That testimony is embodied in the writings
of the apostles and their contemporaries. Those writings were issued
at an advanced stage in the history of the world. They have come
down to us through the same channel — they come, accompanied with
the same vouchers for their authenticity — with a vast mass of othei
ancient writings, whose genuineness and credibility no one has ever
denied. Our belief in the miracles of Jesus is thus bound up with
our belief in a large portion of ancient history, for our knowledge of
which we are indebted to writings of equal and greater antiquity than
those of the New Testament. If we renounce the one, we must, in all
fairness, renounce the other also. We must blot out all that is
alleged to have happened in the world from this date upwards. It
has been of the greatest possible service in the defence of Christianity
against the attack of scholarly men s that the life of Jesus Christ, re-
corded in the four gospels, forms part and parcel of so large a portion
of the preserved literature of antiquity — written, as it were, with the
same ink, published at the same time, preserved in the same manner,
so that together they must stand or together fall. How should it
have stood, if, instead of being as it is, those miracles of Christ had
been wrought far back in the world's history; the record of them
written at some period preceding that from which any other authentic
narrative had come down to us, some centuries before the date of the
first acknowledged book of common history? Who does not perceive
to what exceptions, just or unjust, they would, in consequence, have
been exposed? Who does not perceive that, fixing his eye upon the
barbarous and fabulous age in which the record originated, and upon
the longer and more perilous passage that it had made, with some
show at least of reason, with some apparent ground for the distinc-
tion, other ancient histories might have been received, and yet this
one rejected? We have to thank God then for the wisdom of that
order of things whereby, in consequence of the particular time at
which Christ appeared, our faith in him as the heaven-sent Saviour
rests upon the same solid basis with our faith in the best accredited
facts of common history.
We can discern another great and beneficial purpose that wag
served by the appearance of Christ at so late a period. The world
was left for a long while to itself, to make full proof of its capabilities
and dispositions. Many great results it realized. There were coiin
THE NATIVITY. 25
tries unvisited by any light from heaven, upon which the sun of civil-
ization rose and shone with no mean lustre ; where the intellect of
man acted as vigorously as it has ever done on earth ; where all the
arts and refinements of life were brought to the highest state of cul-
ture; where taste and imagination revelled amid the choicest objectg
of gratification ; where, in poetry and in painting, and in sculpture
and in architecture, specimens of excellence were furnished which re-
main to this day the models that we strive to imitate. Was nothing
gained by allowing Egypt, Greece, and Eome to run out their full
career of civilization, while the light from heaven was confined mean-
while to the narrow limits of Judea? Was nothing gained by its
being made no longer a matter of speculation but a matter of fact,
that man may rise in other departments, but in religion will not, left
un aided, rise to God; that he may make great progress in other kinds
of knowledge, but make no progress in the knowledge of his Maker;
that he may exercise his intellect, regale his fancy, refine his taste,
correct his manners, but will not, cannot purify his heart ? For what
was the actual state of matters in those countries unblest by revela-
tion? We have the description drawn by an unerring hand: "They
became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was dark-
ened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and
changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like
to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping
things ; who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and
served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever."
We should have lost that exhibition of the greatest refinement coupled
with the grossest idolatry, had the light of Kevelation mingled uni-
versally from the first with the light of ordinary civilization.
Let us look a little more closely at the condition of Judea rela-
tively to the Eoman Empire at the time of our Lord's birth and death.
It was owing, as we have already mentioned, to Herod's being nomi-
nally a sovereign but virtually a subject, that the order for registra-
tion came to be executed in Palestine which forced Mary from Naza-
reth to Bethlehem. Is there nothing impressive in seeing the power
of Home thus interposed to determine the Kedeemer's birthplace ; the
pride and policy of the world's great monarchy employed as an instru-
ment for doing what the hand and counsel of the Lord had deter-
mined beforehand to be done? But even that nominal kingdom
which Herod enjoyed soon passed from his family. A few years afto*
the birth of Christ, Archelaus, who reigned in Judea in the room oi
his father Herod, was deposed and banished. Judea had then a
Koman governor placed over it. Still, however, whether through
26 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
respect to its banished princes, or some latent reverence for its temple
and ancient laws, the old national and priestly authorities were suf-
fered to continue and enjoy some part of their old power and privi-
leges. It was an anomalous and short-lived state of things ; a Jewish
law and Jewish officers, under a Eoman law and Roman officers : the
two fitted into each other by certain limits being assigned to the in-
ferior or Jewish judicatories which they were not permitted to over-
pass. To no Jewish court, not even to the highest, the Sanhedrim,
was the power of inflicting capital punishment intrusted ; and it was
wholly owing to that peculiar and temporary adjustment that all the
formality of an orderly trial, and all the publicity of a legal execution
was stamped upon the closing scenes of the Saviour's life. Had Jesus
Christ appeared one half-century earlier, or one half-century later than
he did ; had he appeared when the Jewish authorities had uncheck-
ed power, how quickly, how secretly had their deadly malice dis-
charged itself upon his head ! No cross had been raised on Calvary.
Had he come a few years later, when the Jews were stripped even of
that measure of power they for a short season enjoyed, would the
Roman authorities, then the only ones in the land, of their own mo-
tion have condemned and crucified him? Even as it was, it was im-
possible to persuade Pilate that Jesus was either a rival whom Ca?sar
had any reason to fear, or a rebel whom it became him to punish.
Why then was the rule over Judea at this time in the hands of Rome?
and why was that power induced to treat Judea for a time so differ-
ently from her other subject provinces? Why, but that she might
be standing there ready, when Christ fell into the hands of his exas-
perated countrymen, to extricate him from that grasp under which in
darkness he might have perished; and, though she too denied him
justice, yet by her weak and vacillating governor, that hers might be
the voice proclaiming aloud his innocence ; hers the hand to erect the
cross, and lift it up so high that the eyes of all the nations and all the
ages might behold it.
But let us now turn to the narrative of our Redeemer's birth.
JTien Mary was at first informed that Joseph and she must go to
Bethlehem, perhaps she shrunk from so long a journey, lingered to
the last ere she entered on it, and took it slowly. She was late at
least in her arrival at the village. The inn, we may well suppose the
single one that so small a place afforded for the entertainment of
si rangers,* was crowded. She had to take the only accommodation
° The inn or khan was frequently in the earliest times the house of the sheikh
jr chief man of the place. A very interesting resume of all the historical notices
b£ the inn or khan of Bethlehem is given in the Atkenceum for December 26,
THE NATIVITY. 27
thai the place afforded. Adopting here the early tradition of the
chiueh, as reported by Justin Martyr, who was born about a century
afterwards, and within fifty miles from Bethlehem, let us say, she had
to go into one of the caves or grottos in the rock common in the
neighborhood, connected with the inn. There, where the camels an; 3
the asses had their stalls; there, far away from home and friends
among strangers all too busy to care for her; amid all the rude ex-
posure and confusion of the place, Mary brought forth her first-bora
son, and when her hour was over, having swathed him with her own
weak hands, laid him in a manger.
A very lowly mode of entering upon human life : nothing what
ever to dignify, every thing to degrade. Yet the night of that won-
derful birth was not to pass by without bearing upon its bosom a
bright and signal witness of the greatness of the event. Sloping
down from the rocky ridge on which Bethlehem stood, there lay some
giassy fields, where all that night long some shepherds watched theii
flocks; humble, faithful, industrious men; men, too, of whom we are
persuaded that, Simeon-like, they were waiting for the Consolation oJ
Israel; who had simpler and more spiritual notions of their Messiah
than most of the w 7 ell-taught scribes of the metropolis. They would
not have understood the angel's message so well; they would not
have believed it so readily; they would not have hastened so quick, j
to Bethlehem; they would not have bent with such reverence over so
humble a cradle; they would not have made known abroad what had
been told them concerning this child — made it known as a thing in
which they themselves most heartily believed — had they not been
devout, believing men. Under the starry heavens, along the lonely
hill-sides, these shepherds are keeping their watch, thinking perhaps
of the time when these very sheep-walks were trodden by the young
son of Jesse, or remembering some ancient prophecy that told of the
coming of one who was to be David's son and David's Lord. Sud-
denly the angel of the Lord comes upon them, the glory of the Lord
encompasses them with a girdle of light brighter than the mid-day
sun could have thrown around them. They fear as they see that
form, and as they are encircled by that glory, but their alarm is in-
stantly dispelled. "Fear not," says the angel, "for, behold, I bring
you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto
you is born this day, in the city of David, a Saviour, which is Christ
the Lord." Mary had been told that her child was to be called
1863, which makes it more than probable that the place oi Christ's birth waa
close to, if not within, the very house to which Boaz conducted Ruth, an i in
Which Samuel anointed David king.
28 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Jesus, that he was to be great, to be son of the Highest, the heir to
his father David's throne, the head of an everlasting monarchy.
Joseph had been told that he was to call the child born of Mary,
Jesus, for he was to save his people from their sins— a simpler and
less Jewish description of his office. The angel speaks of him to
: iiese shepherds in still broader and sublimer terms. Unto them and
anto all people this child was to be born, and unto them and unto all
he was to be a Saviour, Christ the Lord, the only instance in which
the double epithet, Christ the Lord, is given in this form to him. A
universal, a divine Messiahship was to be his.
The shepherds ask no sign, as Zacharias and Mary had done; ye I
they got one: "And this," said the angel, "shall be a sign unto you:
Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying iu a
manger. But one such child, born that night, wrapped up in such
a way, lying in such a place, could so small a village as Bethlehem
supply. That village lay but a mile or so from the spot they stood
on; the sign could speedily be verified. But they have something
more to see and hear ere their visit to the village is paid. The voice
of that single angel has scarce died away in the silence of the night-
lost in wonder they are still gazing on his radiant form — when sud
denly a whole multitude of the heavenly host bursts upon their aston-
ished vision, hiring the illuminated heavens. Human eyes never saw
before or since so large a company of the celestial inhabitants hover-
ing in our earthly skies ; and human ears never heard before or since
such a glorious burst of heavenly praise as those angels then poured
forth — couching it in Hebrew speech, then native tongue for the time
foregone, that these listening shepherds may catch up at once the
cradle-hymn that heaven now chants over the new-born Saviour;
that these shepherds may repeat it to the men of their own genera-
tion ; that from age to age it may be handed down, and age after ago
may take it up as supplying the fittest terms in which to celebrate
the Kedeemer's birth — " Glory to God in the highest ; on earth peace,
good will towards men."
At the moment when these words first saluted human ears, what
a contrast did they open up between earth and heaven! As that
babe was born in Bethlehem, this world lay around him in silence, in
darkness, in ignorant unconcern. But all heaven was moved ; for s
l&rge as that company of angels was which the shepherds saw, what
were they to the thousands that encircle the throne of the Eternal !
And the song of praise the shepherds heard, what was it to the voice,
as of many waters, which rose triumphant around that throne ! That
little dropping of its praise committed for human use to human keep-
THE NATIVITY. 29
ing, heaven hastily veiled itself again from human vision. The whole
angelic manifestation passed rapidly away. The shepherds are startled
in then* midnight rounds ; a flood of glory pours upon them ; their
eyes are dazzled with those forms of light ; their ears are full of that
thrilling song of praise; suddenly the glory is gone; the shining
forms have vanished; the stars look down as before through the
darkness; they are left to a silent, unspeakable wonder and awe.
They soon, however, collect their thoughts, and promptly resolve to
go at once into the village. They go in haste; the sign is verified;
they find Mary and Joseph, and the babe lying in the manger. They
justify their intrusion by telling all that they had just seen and
heard; and amid the sorrows and humiliations of that night, how
cheering to Mary the strange tidings that they bring! Having told
these, they bend with rude yet holy reverence over the place where
the infant Saviour lies, and go their way to finish their night-watch
among the hills, and then for all their life long afterwards to repeat
to wondering listeners the story of that birth. With those shepherds
let us bend for a moment or two over the place where the infant
Redeemer lay, to meditate on one or two of the lessons which it is
fitted to suggest.
By the manner of his entrance into this world, Christ hath digni-
fied the estate of infancy, has hallowed the bond which binds tha
mother to her new-born child. He, the great Son of God, stooped to
assume our humanity. He might have done so at once ; taken it ok
him in its manhood form. The second Adam might have stood forth
like the first, no childhood passed through. Why did he become an
infant before he was a man ? Was it not, among other reasons which
may suggest themselves, that he might consecrate that first of human
ties, that earliest estate of human life ? The grave, we say, has been
hallowed — has not the cradle also — by Christ's having lain in it ?
By the humiliation of his birth, he stripped the estate of poverty
of all reproach. Of all who have ever been born into this world, he
was the only one with whom it was a matter of choice in what condi-
tion he should appear. The difference, indeed, between our highest
and our lowest — between a chamber in a palace, and a manger in a
stable — could have been but slight to him ; yet he chose to be bom
in the stable, and to be laid in the manger. And that first stage oif
his earthly life was in keeping with all that followed. For thirty
years he depended on his own or others' labor for his daily bread
for three years more, he was a houseless, homeless man, with no pro
vision but that which the generosity of others supplied: "The t'oxea
had holes, and the birds of the ah* had nests; but he had not where
30 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to lay his head." And has not that life of his redeemed poverty from
all disgrace ; has it not lifted it to honor ?
As we bend in wonder over the infant Saviour, we learn the dif-
ference between the inferior and higher forms of an earthly greatness.
On that night when Christ was born, what a difference was there in
all outward marks of distinction, between that child of the Hebrew
mother as he lay in his lowly cradle, and the Augustus Caesar whose
edict brought Mary to Bethlehem, as he reposed in his imperial
palace ! And throughout the lifetimes of the two there was but little
to lessen that distinction. The name of the one was known and hon-
ored over the whole civilized globe: the name of the other scarce
heard of beyond the narrow bounds of Judea. And when repeated
there, it was too often as a byword and a reproach. How stands it
now ? The throne of the Caesars, the throne of mere human authority
and power, has perished. That name, at which nations trembled,
carries no power over the spirits of men. But the empire of Jesus,
the empire of pure, undying, self-sacrificing love, will never perish;
its sway over the conscience and hearts of men, as the world grows
older becomes ever wider and stronger. His name shall be honored
while sun and moon endure ; men shall be blessed in him ; all nations
shall call him blessed. This world owes an infinite debt to him, were
It for nothing else than this, that he has so exalted the spiritual
ibove the material ; the empire of love above the empire of power.
Again we bend over this infant as he lies in that manger at Beth-
lehem, and as we do so, strange scenes in his after life rise upon our
memory. Those little, tender feet, unable to sustain the infant frame,
are yet to tread upon the roughened waters of a stormy lake, as men
tread the solid earth. At the touch of that little, feeble hand, the
blind eye is to open, and the tied tongue to be unloosed, and diseases
of all kinds are to take wings and flee away. That soft, weak voice,
whose gentle breathings in his infant slumbers can scarce be heard,
is to speak to the winds and the waves, and they shall obey it ; is to
summon the dead from the sepulchre, and they shall come forth.
Who then, and what was he, whose birth the angels celebrated in
such high strains ? None other than he of whom Isaiah, anticipating
the angels, had declared: "Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is
given ; and the government shall be upon his shoulder : and his name
shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The ever-
lasting Father, The Prince of Peace." It was He, the Word, who
iras from the beginning with God and who was God, who was thus
made flesh and came to dwell among us. This is, in truth, the cen-
tral fact or doctrine of our religion; the mystery of mysteries; tho
THE PEESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE. 31
one great miracle of divine, everlasting love. Admit it, and all the
other wonders of the Saviour's life become not only easy of belief —
they appear but the natural and suitable incidents of such a historj
as his. Deny it, and the whole gospel narrative becomes an inex<
plicable enigma. The very heart of its meaning taken out of it, yon
may try to turn it into a myth or fable if you please ; but a credible
story it no longer is. No; not credible even in that part of it into
frhieh nothing of the supernatural enters. Christ was either what he
claimed to be, and what all those miraculous attestations conspire to
establish that he was; he was either one with the Father, knowing
the Father as the Father knew him, doing whatever the Father did—
so direct and full a revelation of the Father that it could be truly
said that he who had seen him had seen the Father likewise ; 01
his character for simplicity and honesty and truthfulness stands im-
peached, and the whole fabric of Christianity is overturned.
Let those angels teach us in what light we should regard the birth
of Christ, the advent of the Redeemer. They counted it as glad
tidings of great joy that they gave forth when they announced that
birth; they broke forth together in exulting praises over it, as glori-
fying God in the highest, as proclaiming peace on earth, as indi*
eating good will towards men. In that good will of God to us in Christ
lot us heartily believe; into that peace with God secured to us in
Christ let us humbly and gratefully enter. Those glad tidings oi
great joy let us so receive as that they shall make us joyful, that so
Christ may be glorified in us on earth, and we be glorified with him
throughout eternity.
III.
The Presentation in the Temple.*
On the eighth day after his birth Christ was circumcised : the
visible token of his being one of the seed of Abraham according tc
the flesh was thus imposed. In his case, indeed, this rite could not
have that typical or spiritual meaning which in all other cases it bore.
It could point to no spiritual defilement needing to be removed. But
though on that ground exemption might have been claimed for him.
on other grounds it became him in this as in other respects to fulfij
the requirements of the Jewish law. From the earliest period, from
thj& first institution of the rite, it had been the Jewish custom to give
* Luke 2 : 21-38.
o2 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
its name to the child on the occasion of its circumcision. The angel,
indeed, who had appeared to Zacharias and to Mary, had in each
instance announced beforehand what the names of the two children
were to be. These however were not formally imposed till the day
of their circumcision. In the Baptist's case there was a large assem-
blage of relations and friends upon that day; and springing out oi
the peculiar condition of the father, the naming of John was attended
with such striking circumstances, that the fame of them was noised
abroad throughout all the hill Gountry of Judea. At Bethlehem
Joseph and Mary were too far away from all their kindred to call
any assemblage of them together. In their humbler position they
might not have done it, even had they been resident at the time in
Nazareth. Quietly, privately, obscurely, they circumcised their child,
and gave to liim the name of Jesus, that name so rich in meaning, so
full of promise.
Forty days after the birth of Jesus, Joseph and Mary carried the
infant up to Jerusalem. There was a double object in this visit.
Mary had to present the offering which the Jewish law required at
the hands of every mother when the days of her purification were
accomplished. This offering, in the case of all whose circumstances
enabled them to present it, was to consist of a lamb of the first year
Cor a burnt-offering, and a young pigeon or a turtle-dove for a sin-
offering. With that consideration for the poor which marks so manj
of the Mosaic ordinances, it was provided that if the mother were not
able to furnish a lamb, a pair of turtle-doves or two young pigeons
were to be accepted, the one for the burnt-offering, and the other for
the sin-offering. That such was the offering which Joseph and Mary
presented to the priest, carried with it an unmistakable evidence of
the poverty of then estate. Besides discharging this duty, Mary had
at the same time to dedicate her inf ant son as being a first-born clnld
to the Lord, and to pay the small sum fixed as the price of his re-
demption.
There were few more common, few less noticeable sights than the
one witnessed that forenoon within the temple when Christ's presen-
tation as a first-born child took place. It happened every day that
mothers brought their children to be in this way dedicated and re-
deemed. It was part of the daily routine work of the priest-in-wait-
ing to take their payments, to hold up the children before the altar,
to enroll their names in the register of the first-born, and so to com-
plete the dedication; a work which from its commonness he went
through without giving much attention either to parents or to child,
unless indeed there was something special in their rank, or their
THE PRESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE. 33
appearance, or their offerings. But here there was nothing of this
kind. A poor man and woman, in humblest guise, with humblest
offerings, present themselves before him. The woman holds out her
first-born babe ; he takes, presents, enrolls, and hands it back to her;
all seems over, and what is there in so common, plain, and simple an
old Jewish custom worthy of any particular notice? We shall be
able to answer that question better, by considering for a moment
what this rite of the dedication of the first-born among the Israel-
ites really meant, especially as applied to this first-born, to this child
Jesus.
When Moses first got his commission from the Lord in Midian,
and was told to go and work out the great deliverance of his people
from their Egyptian bondage, the last instruction he received was
this: "And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the Lord, Israel
is my son, even my first-born. And I say unto thee, Let my son go,
that he may serve me : and if thou refuse to let him go, behold, I
will slay thy son, even thy first-born." Exod. 4 : 22, 23. As a mother
reclaims her infant from the hands of a cruel nurse, as a father
reclaims his son from the hands of a severe and capricious school-
master, so the Lord reclaimed his son, his first-born Israel, from the
hands of Pharaoh. But the king's haughty answer to the demand
was : " Who is the Lord, that I should obey his voice to let Israel
go?" Sign after sign was shown, wonder after wonder wrought, woe
after woe inflicted, but the spirit of the proud king remained unbro-
ken. At last, all lesser instruments having failed, the sword was put
into the hands of the destroying angel, and he was sent forth to exe-
cute that foretold doom, which — meant to strike at the very heart of
the entire community of Egypt — fell actually only upon the first-born
in every family. The nation was taken as represented by these its
first and best. In their simultaneous death on that terrible night,
Egypt throughout all its borders was smitten. But the first-born of
Israel was saved, and through them, as representatives of the whole
body of the people, all Israel was saved; saved, yet not without
blood, not without the sacrifice of the lamb, for every household had
the sprinkling of its shed blood upon the lintel and door-post. It
was to preserve and perpetuate the memory of this judgment and this
mercy, this smiting and this shielding, this doom and this deliverance,
that the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, " Sanctify unto me all the
fir3t-born, both of man and beast ; it is mine : for on the day that I
smote all the first-born in the land of Egypt, I hallowed unto me all
the first-born in Israel ; mine they shall be : I am the Lord. And it
shall be, when thy son asketh thee in time to come, saying, What is
Uf» of Chrtat.
$i THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
this? that thou shalt say unto him, By strength of hatid the Lord
brought us out from Egypt, from the house of bondage : and it came
to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly let us go, that the Lord slew all
the first-bom in the land of Egypt, both the first-born of man and
the first-born of beast: therefore I sacrifice to the Lord all that open-
eth the matrix, being males ; but all the first-born of my children I
redeem." Exod. 13 : 1 ; Numb. 3 : 13 ; Exocl. 13 : 14, 15. During the
earlier and simpler patriarchal economy, the first-born in every fam-
ily was also its priest. Had that rule been followed when the twelve
tribes were organized into the Theocracy, the first-born invested with
a double sacredness, as peculiarly the redeemed of the Lord, would
have been consecrated to the office of the priesthood. Instead of
tins, the tribe of Levi was set apart that it might supply all the
priests required for the services of the sanctuary; and the first-born
for whom they were thus substituted were redeemed or released from
that service by the payment each, on the day of their presentation in
the temple, of a merely nominal gratuity; by that payment, the
original right and title, as it were, of the first-born to the office of the
priesthood being still preserved.
This rite, then, of the presentation of the first-born in the temple
had a double character and office. It was a standing memorial or
remembrancer of a past fact in the history of the Jewish people — the
deliverance of their forefathers from the bondage of Egypt, and espe-
cially of the shielding of their first-born from the stroke which fell on
ah the first-born of the Egyptians; but the deliverance from Egyp-
tian bondage was itself a type and prophecy of another higher and
wider deliverance, and especially of the manner in which that deliv-
erance was to be wrought out.
In the light of this explanation, let us look yet once again at our
Lord's presentation in the temple as a first-born child, and see
whether — as the eye of faith looks through the outward actions to
that which the actions symbolize, looks through the outward form
and discerns the spiritual significance — the whole scene does not
become, as it were, transfigured before us. You mount the steps, and
come up into this temple at Jerusalem. It is neither a feast-day nor
a Sabbath-day, nor is it the fixed hour for prayer. A few priests, or
Levites, or other hangers-on of the holy place, are loitering in the
outer courts. A man and woman in Galilean dress, the woman bear
ing an infant in her arms, cross the court and go forward to where
the priest is standing, whose duty it is to present whatever individual
sacrifices or oblations may that day be offered. They tell the priest
their errand, hand to him or to one of his attendants the two young
THE PRESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE. 35
turtle-doves and the five shekels of the sanctuary. He in his turn
goes through with his part of the prescribed ceremonial, and gives
the child back again to his parents as a first-born child that had been
duly devoted to the Lord. The father, the mother, the priest, what-
ever onlookers there are, all imagine that nothing more has been
done in all this than is so often done when first-born children are
consecrated. But was it so ? Who is this child that lies so passive
on its mother's breast, and all unconscious of what is being done with
him, is handled by the officiating priest? He is, as his birth had
proclaimed him to be, one of the seed of Abraham, and yet he after-
wards said of himself, "Before Abraham was, I am." He is, as the
angel had proclaimed him to be, David's son and David's heir ; but
as he said afterwards of himself, the root as well as the branch of
David : David's Lord as well as David's son. He is the first-born of
Mary, but he is also the first-born of every creature, the beginning
of the creation of God. He is the infant of a few weeks old, but also
the Ancient of Days, whose goings forth were from of old, from ever-
lasting. Here then at last is the Lord, the Jehovah, whom so many
of the Jews were seeking, brought suddenly, almost, as one might
say, unconsciously into his own temple. Here is the Lamb of God,
of old provided, now publicly designated and set apart — of which the
paschal one, the sight of whose blood warded off the stroke of the
destroying angel, was but the imperfect type. Here is the one and
only true High Priest over the house of God, consecrated to his
office, of whose all prevailing, everlasting, and unchangeable priest-
hood, the Aaronic priesthood, the priesthood of the first-born, was
but the dim shadow. Here is the Son presented to the Father, within
the holy place on earth, as he enters upon that fife of service, suffer-
ing, sacrifice, the glorious issue of which was to be his entering not
by the blood of bulls and goats, but by his own blood, into that holy
place not made with hands, having obtained eternal redemption for
us, there for ever to present himself before the Father, as the living
head of the great community of the redeemed, the general assembly
and church of the first-born which are written in heaven.
How little did that Jewish priest, who took the infant Saviour and
held him up before the altar, imagine that a greater than Moses, one
greater than the temple, was in his arms ! How little did he ima-
gine, as he inscribed the new name of Jesus in the roll of the first-
born of Israel, that he was signing the death-warrant of the Mosaic
economy now waxing old and ready to vanish away; that he was
ushering in that better, brighter day, when neither of the temple
upon Mount Zion, nor of that upon Gerizim, it should be said tha*
36 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
there only was the true worship of Jehovah celebrated ; but when,
taught by this very Jesus to know God as our Father in heaven,
unfettered and redeemed humanity in every land should worship him
who is a Spirit in spirit and in truth. Yet even so it was; Christ's
first entrance into the temple, his dedication there unto the Lord,
was no such common ceremonial as we might fancy it to be. Simple
in form, there lay in it a depth and sublimity of meaning. It was
nothing else than the first formal earthly presentation to the Fathei
of the incarnate Son of God, his first formal earthly dedication to
that great work given him to do. And was it not meet when the
Father and the Son were brought visibly together in this relation-
ship, that the presence of the Holy Spirit should be manifested; that
by that Spirit Simeon and Anna should be called in, and by that
Spirit their lips should be made to speak the infant Saviour's praise ;
that so within the temple, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit might all
appear, dignifying with their presence our Lord's first entrance into
the holy place ; his consecration to his earthly mediatorial work ?
Two fitter channels through which the Spirit's testimony might
thus be given could scarcely have been chosen. Simeon and Anna
both belonged to that limited number, who in the midst of all the
crude and carnal conceptions of the Messiah prevalent among their
countrymen, were waiting for Christ and longing for his coming, not
so much for the temporal as for the spiritual benefits which his com-
ing and kingdom were to convey. Both were well stricken in years,
fit representatives of the closing age of Judaism; both were full of
faith and hope, fit representatives of that new age whose earliest
dawn they were among the first to notice and to welcome.
So ardent as his years ran on had Simeon's faith and hope
become, that this one thing had he desired of the Lord, that before
his eyes closed in death they might rest upon his Saviour. And he
was heard as to that for which he had so longed. It was revealed to
him that the desire of his heart should be granted, but how and when
he knew not. That forenoon, however, a strong desire to go up into
the temple seizes him. He was not accustomed to go there at that
hour, but he obeyed that inward impulse, which perhaps he recog-
nized as the work of the Divine Spirit, by whom the gracious revela-
tion had been made to him. He enters the temple courts; he noti-
ces a little family group approach; he sees an infant dedicated to the
Lord. That infant, an inward voice proclaims to him is the Messiah
he has been waiting for, the Consolation of Israel come at last in the
flesh. Then comes into his heart a joy beyond all bounds It kin-
dles in his radiant looks ; it beats in his swelling veins ; the strength
THE PBESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE. 37
of youth is back again into his feeble limbs. He hastens up to Mary,
takes from the wondering yet consenting mother's hands the conse-
crated babe, and clasping it to his beating bosom, with eyes uplifted
to heaven, he says, "Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in
peace, according to thy word; for mine eyes have seen thy salvation,
which thou hast prepared before the face of all people ; a light to
lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel." Joseph
and Mary stand lost in wonder. How has this stranger come to see
aught uncommon in this child ; how come to see in him the salvation
of Israel ? Have some stray tidings of his birth come into the holy
city from the hill country of Judea, or has the wondrous tale the
shepherds of Bethlehem "made known abroad," been repeated in
this old man's hearing? What he says is in curious harmony with
all the angel had announced to Mary and to the shepherds about the
child, and yet there is a difference; for now, for the first time, is it
distinctly declared that this child shall be a light to lighten the Gen-
tiles ; nay, his being such a light is placed even before his being the
glory of Israel. Has Simeon had a separate revelation made to him
from heaven, and is this an independent and fuller testimony borne
tc the Messiahship of Jesus ?
Simeon sees the wonder that shines out in their astonished looks;
and, the spirit of prophecy imparted — that spirit which had been
mute in Israel since the days of Malachi, but which now once more
lifts up its voice within the temple — he goes on, after a gentle bless-
ing bestowed upon both parents, to address himself particularly to
Mary, furnishing in his words to her fresh material for wonder, while
opening a new future to her eye. "Behold," he said to her, " this
child of thine is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel."
He may have meant, in saying so, that the purpose and effect of the
Lord's showing unto Israel would be the casting down of many in
order to the raising of them up again ; the casting of them down from
their earlier, worldlier thoughts and expectations, in order to the
lifting them to higher, worthier, more spiritual conceptions of his
character and office. Or, perhaps it was to different and not to tho
same persons that he referred, the truth revealed being this : that
while some were to rise, others were to fall; that the stone which to
some was to be a foundation-stone elect and precious, was to others
to be a stone of stumbling and rock of offence; that Jesus was to
come for judgment into the world, that those who saw not might see,
that those who saw might be made blind; his name to be ihe savor
of life unto life to the one, the savor of death unto death to the
other.
M THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
From all Mary Lad yet heard, she might have imagined thai hei
child would be welcomed by all Israel — so soon as the day for his
revelation came — as its long-looked for deliverer; and that a career
of unsnffering triumph would lie before him — a career in whose hon-
ors and bliss she could scarcely help at times imagining that the
should have a share. But now, for the first time, the indication i*$
clearly given that all Israel was not to hail her child and welcome
him as its Messiah ; that hostility was to spring up even within the
ranks of the chosen people ; that he was to be a " sign which should
be spoken against;" or rather — for such is the more literal rendering
of the words — a butt or mark at which many shafts or javelins should
be launched. Nor was Mary herself to escape. Among the many
swords or darts levelled at his breast, one was to reach hers: "Tea,
a sword shall pierce through thine own soul also." Strange that in
the very centre of so broad and comprehensive a prophecy concern-
ing Christ, such a minute and personal allusion to Mary should come
in ; a high honor put upon the mother of our Lord that her individual
sorrows should be foretold in this way in connection with the deeper
sorrows of her Son ; and a singular token of the tender sympathy of
Him by whom it was prompted, that now when her heart was filling
with strange, bright hopes, now while her child was yet an infant,
now ere the evil days drew on, when she should have to see him
become the object of reproach and persecution, and stand herself to
look at him upon that cross of shame and agony on which they hung
him up to die — that now to temper her first-born joy, to prepare and
fortify her for the bitter trials in store for her, this prophecy should
have been thus early spoken.
" That the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed." No such
revealer of the thoughts of men's hearts has the world ever seen as
Jesus Christ. His presence, his character, his ministry brought out
to light the hidden things of many a human spirit. He walked abroad
applying upon all sides the infallible test which tried the temper of
the soul : " If I had not come," he said, " they had not had sin, but
now they have no cloak for their sin." In its uncloaked nakedness
he made the sin be seen. "I know you," said he to the Jews,
"that ye have not the love of God in you;" and the reason that he
gave for this was, that they had rejected him. Coming into contact
with them all in turn, he revealed the hypocrisy- of the Pharisees, the
worldhness of the young ruler, the faith of the Syro-Phcenician woman,
the malice of the Sanhedrim, the weakness of Pilate, the treachery
of Judas, the rashness of Peter, the tender care and sympathy of
Marv. Throughout the whole of his- earthly life, the description given
THE NATIVITY. 39
here by Simeon was continually being verified. That description
itself throughout reveals its divine origin and character. It proves
itself to have been no bold conjecture of human wisdom, but a reve-
lation of the future made by God.
Simeon's prophetic portraiture of the intention and effect of the
advent of the Eedeemer had scarcely been completed when another
testimony was added, that of the aged Anna, the daughter of Phanuel,
who, like her venerable compeer, appears but this once in the sacred
page, and then is hidden for ever from our eyes. It is not said that
any special impulse drew her to the temple. It was her daily haunt.
Instantly serving God day and night, her life was one of fastings and
prayers. When it was also made known to her that the infant whom
she met in the temple was no other than the Christ of God, her song
of praise was added to that of Simeon, but the words of it are lost.
It would, we may be assured, be a suitable accompaniment, a fit
response to his. He, as may be believed, retired from the temple
to close his eyes in peace ; but she was moved to go about and speak
of the Lord whom she had found to all that looked for redemption in
Jerusalem — the first preacher of the gospel, the first female evangelist
in the holy city.
In the briefest terms, let one or two practical reflections be now
suggested.
Simeon did not wish to die till he had seen the Lord his Saviour;
as soon as he saw Him he was ready and willing to depart. Till our
spiritual eyes be opened to see Him who is the way, the truth, and
the life, which of us is ready to meet our Maker — is prepared to
behold his face in peace ? But when once our eyes have seen and
our hearts embraced him, which of us should fear to die ? Simeon
desired to depart. It was not that, like Job, he wished to die because
life had become burdensome. His wish to depart was not the prod-
uct of hours of bitter sorrow, but of a moment of exceeding joy. It
was not that, like Paul, he desired to depart in order to be with
Christ. It was the fulness of that gratitude which he felt for the
great gift of God in allowing him to see Christ in the flesh ; it was
the depth of that satisfaction and delight which filled his heart as
his arms enfolded Jesus, which, leaving nothing more, nothing higher
that he could hope for in this world, drew forth, as by a natural
impulse, the expression, " Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart
in peace, for mine eyes have seen thy salvation." Though nothing
is said about his age in the evangelical narrative, we may believe that
the length of years which he had already reached, making the thought
of approaching departure from this world familiar, conspired, if not
40- THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
to beget, yet to give emphasis to this expression of his desire. But
't may be well, even though we be not in his exact position, to put to
mrselves the question whether any desire or any willingness we have
ever had to die was the fruit of hours of earthly disappointments, or
af moments of spiritual elation and joy.
Christ was set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; he
is set for the fall and rising again of many still. His gospel never
leaves us as it finds us. It softens or it hardens, it kills or it makes
alive. That stone which the Jewish builders rejected is rejected by
many builders still, and yet it is the headstone of the corner. Blessed
is he who grounds thereon his humble yet undoubting trust. " But
many among them," saith the prophet, " shall stumble and fall, and
be broken' 1 upon this stone. May our feet be shielded from such
a fate!
The sufferings of Mary were linked with the sufferings of her Son.
It was his being wounded that wounded her. It was the stroke which
descended on him that sent the sword into her heart. The same kind
of tie should bind every believer to Christ. He is so sensitive as to
all that affects his people's welfare and happiness, that whatever
hurts the least of these his little ones touches the apple of his eye.
And they in turn should be so sensitive as to all that affects his honor,
his cause, his kingdom on earth, that whatever damages or injures
them should send a thrill of answering sorrow through then heart.
Finally, Christ is the great Bevealer of the thoughts and intents
of the heart. Are we proud, are we covetous, are we worldly, are we
self-willed? Nothing will more bring out the sway and empire of
these or any kindred passions over us than the bringing closer home
to us the holy character and unmitigable claims of Jesus Christ.
Keep them at a distance, and the strong man armed keeps the pal-
ace of the soul, and all comparatively is at peace. Bring them near,
force them home upon the conscience and the heart ; then it is that
the inward struggle begins; and in that struggle the spirit un< on-
sciously revealeth its true condition before God.
THE VISIT OF THE MAGI. 41
IV.
The Visit of the Magi.*
Three striking incidents marked the birth and infancy of oui
Lord. First, the midnight appearance of the angelic host to the
shepherds on the plains of Bethlehem, and their visit to the village
in which the great birth had that night occurred ; second, the presen-
tation of Jesus as a first-born child in the temple, and the testimony
there given to him in the prophetic utterances of Simeon and Anna ;
and third, the visit of the wise men from the East, and the worship
and offerings which they presented to the new-born child. Each of
these had its special wonders ; in each a supernatural attestation to
the greatness of the event was given ; and woven together, they form
the wreath of heavenly glory hung by the Divine hand around the
infancy of the Son of Mary.
It is impossible to determine the date of the visit of the wise men.
It must have occurred not long after the birth, while Joseph and Mary
still lingered in Bethlehem, and it is of little moment whether we
place it before or after the presentation in the Temple at Jerusalem.
The epithet by which Matthew describes to us these Eastern stran-
gers is not so vague and indefinite as it seems in our translation. H*
calls them Magi from the East. The birthplace and natural home of
the magian worship was in Persia. And there the Magi had a place
and power such as the Chaldaeans had in Babylon, the Hierophants
in Egypt, the Druids in Gaul, and the Brahmins still have in India.
They formed a tribe or caste, priestly in office, princely in rank. They
were the depositaries of nearly all the knowledge or science existing
in the country where they lived; they were the first professors and
practisers of astrology, worshippers of the sun and the other heav-
enly bodies, from whose appearance and movements they drew their
divination as to earthly events — all illustrious births below being
indicated, as they deemed, by certain peculiar conjunctions of the
stars above. Both as priests and diviners they had great power.
They formed, in fact, the most influential section of the community.
In political affairs their influence was predominant. The education
of royalty was in their hands ; they filled all the chief offices of state ;
they constituted the supreme counsel of the realm. As originally
applied to this Median priest-caste, the term Magi was one of dig-
nity and honor. Afterwards, when transferred to other countries.
* Matthew 2 : 1-12.
42 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
and employed to designate not that peculiar sacerdotal order, but all
persons of whatever description who were professors of astrology and
practisers of divination, as these astrologers and diviners sunk in
character, and had recourse to all kinds of mean imposture, the name
i>f magian or magician was turned into one of dishonor and reproach.
There seems no reason, however, to doubt that it was in its earlier
and honorable meaning that it is used in the gospel narrative.
llemarkable passages, both from Roman and Jewish writers,*
have been quoted which inform us that at the period of our Saviour's
birth, there prevailed generally over the East, in regions remote from
Palestine, a vague but strong belief that one born in Judea was to
arise and rule the world. Popularly this expectation was confined to
the appearance of some warrior chief who, by the might of his victo-
rious arms, was to subdue the nations under him. But there were
many then in every land,whose faith in their old hereditary religions
had been undermined ; who from those Jews now scattered every-
where abroad, had learned some of the chief elements of the pure
Israelitish faith; and half embracing it, had risen to a desire and
hope which took a higher ground, and who in this expected king that
was to spring out of Juclah, were ready to hail a spiritual guide and
deliverer. Such, we believe, were the Magi of Matthew's narrative.
Balaam, a man of their own or a kindred tribe, in their own or in a
neighboring country, had centuries before foretold that a star should
come out of Jacob, and a sceptre rise out of Israel. Numb. 24: 17.
This and other of those old Jewish prophecies which pointed to the
same event may have in some form or other reached their ears, pre-
paring them for the birth of one who in the first instance was to be
the king of the Jews, but whose kingdom was to connect itself with
other than mere earthly interests, to have intimate relationships with
man's highest hopes and his eternal destiny. Sharing the general
hope, but with that hope purified and exalted, let us believe that
these Magi were earnestly, devoutly, waiting the coming of this new
king of the Jews and of mankind. Their office and occupation led
them to the nightly study of the starry heavens ; but still as they
gazed and speculated and divined, they felt that it was not from that
glittering broadspread page of wonders hung above their heads that
any clear or satisfying information as to the divine character and
purposes was to be derived. Much as they fancied they could glean
from them as to man's earthly fortunes, what could the bright mute
stars tell them of the eternal destinies of those unnumbered human
spirits which beneath their light were, generation after generation,
* Suetonius, Tacitus, Josephus.
THE VISIT OF THE MAGI. 43
passing away into the world beyond the grave ? How often may the
deep sigh of disappointment have risen from the depths of these
men's hearts, as to all their earnest interrogatories not a word of dis-
tinct response was given, and the heavens they gazed on kept the
untold secret locked in their capacious bosom. But the sigh of the
earnest seeker after truth, like the sigh of the lowly, penitent, and
contrite heart, never rises to the throne of heaven in vain. Many
errors may have mingled with those men's religious opinions, much
superstition have been in their religious worship, but God met in
mercy the truth-seeking spirit in the midst of its errors, and made its
very superstition pave the way to faith.
One night, as those Magi stood watching their cloudless skies,
their practised eye detected a new-come stranger among the stars.
The appearance of new stars is no novelty to the astronomer. We
have authentic records of stars of the first magnitude, rivalling in their
brilliance the brightest of our old familiar planets, shining out sud-
denly in places where no stars had been seen before, and after a sea-
son vanishing away. Singular conjunctions of the planets have also
been occasionally observed, some of which are known to have occur-
red about the time of the Redeemer's birth. It may possibly have
been some such strange appearance in the heavens that attracted the
eyes of the wise men. It is said, however, in the narrative, that the
star went before them till it came and stood over where the young
child was. Understanding this as implying an actual and visible
movement of the star — that it went, lantern-like, before them on their
way, and indicated in some way, as by a finger of pointing light, the
very spot where they were to find the child — as no such function
could be discharged by any of the ordinary inhabitants of the
heavens, all about its appearance must be taken as supernatural, and
we must regard it as some star-like meteor shining in our lower at-
mosphere. But be it what it might, however kindled, whatever curi-
osity its strange appearance might excite — though the Magi, pene-
trated by the popular belief, might naturally enough have regarded
it as an omen of the great expected birth — the star could of itself tell
nothing. However miraculous its appearance, if left without an inter-
preter, it was but a dumb witness after all. The conviction is almost
forced upon us that, in addition to the external sign, there was some
divine communication made to these Magi, informing them of tlu
errand which the star was commissioned to discharge. But why the
double indication of the birth — the star without, the revelation made
within ? Why, but as an evidence and illustration of the care and
gracious condescension of Him who not only to the spiritual commu-
44 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
nication added tlie external sign, to be a help to the weak, infant,
staggering faith, but who, in the very shaping of that outward sign,
was pleased to accommodate himself to these men's earthly calling;
and while to Mary and to the shepherds — Jews living in a land where
stories of angelic manifestations were current — angels were sent to
make announcement of the Eedeemer's birth, to those astrologers of
the East he sends a star, meeting them in their own familiar walks,
showing itself among the divinities of their erring worship, gently to
lead them into His presence to whom the world's true worship was to
be given.
But when this star appeared, and after they understood what its
presence betokened, was it a spontaneous impulse on their part to go
and do homage to the new-born King, or did He who revealed the
birth enjoin the journey ? Whatever the prompting, human or divine,
on which they acted, it does not appear that in the first instance any
thing beyOnd the general information was communicated, that some-
where in Judea the birth had taken place. The star, it would appear,
did not go before them all the way, for in that case they would not
have needed to institute any further inquiry. Its first office dis-
charged, the star disappeared, leaving them to have recourse to such
common sources of information as lay open to them. It was at Jeru-
salem, in the capital of the country over which this new-born King
was to reign ; it was there, if anywhere, the needed intelligence was
to be obtained. To Jerusalem, therefore, they repair. Entering the
holy city, they put eagerly and expectantly the question, "Where is
he that is born King of the Jews ? for we have seen his star in the
east, and are come to worship him."
The question takes the startled city by surprise. No one here has
seen the star, no one here has heard about this king. The tidings of
the arrival of those distinguished strangers, and of the question which
they asked, are carried quickly to the palace, and circulate rapidly
through the city. Herod is troubled. The usurper trembles on his
throne. Has a new claimant, with better title to that throne, indeed
been born? How comes it, if it be so, that he has never heard of
such a birth? Has treachery been already busy at its work; have
they been concealing from him this event ? Have the enemies of
himself and of his family been cloaking thus their projects, waiting
only for the fit time to strike the blow, and hurl him from his seat?
The blood he had already shed to reach that height begins to cry for
vengeance, and spectres of the slaughtered dead shake their terrors
in his face. Herod's trouble at the tidings we well can understand,
but why was it thai all Jerusalem was troubled along with him:
THE YISIT OF THE MAGI. 45
Was it the simple fear of change, the terror of another re^v olution ;
the knowledge of Herod's jealous temper and bloodthirsty disposi-
tion ; the alarm lest his vindictive spirit might prompt him to some
new deed of cruelty, in order to cut off this rival ? If so, how low
beneath the yoke of tyranny must the spirit of those citizens of Jeru-
salem have sunk ; how completely, for the time, must the selfish havt
absorbed the patriotic sentiment in their breasts !
But whatever alarm he felt, whatever dark purposes were brood-
ing in his heart, Herod at first concealed them. He must know more
about this affair, get some information before he acts. He calls
together the chief priests and the scribes, and at no loss, apparently,
to identify the King of the Jews that the Magi asked about with the
Christ the Messiah of ancient prophecy, he demands of them where
Christ should be born. As little at a loss, they lay their hand at
once upon the prophecy of Micah, which pointed to Bethlehem as the
birthplace. Furnished with this information, the King invites the
Magi to a private interview, conveys to them the information he had
himself received, and concealing his sinister designs, sends them off
to Bethlehem to search diligently for the child, and when they had
found him, to bring him word again, that he too, as he falsely said,
might go and worship him.
Let us pause a moment here to reflect upon the impression which
this visit to Jerusalem, and the state of things discovered there, was
fitted to make upon these eastern visitors. It must surely have sur-
prised them to come among the very people over whom this new-born
King was to rule, to enter the capital of their country, the city of the
chief priests and scribes by whom, if by any, an event so signal
should have been known, and to find there no notice, no knowledge
of the birth ; to find instead that they, coming from a strange land,
professors of another faith, are the first to tell these Jews of the
advent of their own king. It must have done more than surprise
them ; they too, in their turn, must have been troubled and perplexed
to see how the announcement, when it was made, was received ; to
see such jealousy, such alarm; and, at the last, so great incredulity
or indifference, that near as Bethlehem was, and interesting as was
the object of their visit to it, there were none among those inhabit-
ants of Jerusalem who oared to accompany them. Was there noth-
ing here to awaken doubt — for such faith as theirs to stagger at?
Might they not have been deceived ? Perhaps it was a delusion they
had listened to — a deceitful appearance they had seen in their own
land. Had these Magi been men of a weak faith or an infirm pur-
pose, they might, instead of going on to Betlilehem, have gone forth
46 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
despondii gly and distrustfully from Jerusalem, and taken their way
back to their own homes. But strange and perplexing as all this is,
it neither shakes their faith nor affects their conduct. They had
good reason to believe that the communication at first made to them
came to them from God, and once satisfied of this, no conduct on
the part of others, however unaccountable or inconsistent, moves
them away from the beginning of their confidence. Though all the
dwellers in Jerusalem be troubled at tidings which should have been
to them tidings of great joy ; though not a Jew be ready to join
them, or to bid them Godspeed ere they leave the city's gate, to
Bethlehem they go.
But a new perplexity arises. Somewhere in that village the birth
has taken place, but who shall tell them where? If the inhabitants
of the capital knew and cared so little about the matter, what help
will they get from the villagers at Bethlehem ? They may require to
search diligently, as Herod bade them, and yet, after all, the search
may be vain. Just then, in the midst of their perplexity, the star
which they had seen in the east once more shone out above their
heads, to go before them till it stood over where the young child lay.
No wonder that, when they saw that star,, they rejoiced with an
exceeding great joy. It dispelled all doubt, it relieved from all per
plexity. When first they saw it, in the East, it wore the face of a
stranger among old friends; now it wears the face of an old friend
among strangers, and they hail it as we hail a friend we thought was
lost, but who comes to us at the very time we need liim most.
Let us note the contrast, as to the mode and measure of divine
guidance given, between the Magi from the East and the shepherds
of Bethlehem and the chief priests and scribes of Jerusalem. The
shepherds were as sincere, perhaps more devout than the wise men;
understanding better who and what the Messiah was to be, and long-
ing more ardently for his coming; but they were uneducated men —
men at least whose position and occupation prevented them from
instituting independent inquiries of their own. They were left to find
out nothing; to them a full revelation was at once given. Such
minute information was furnished as to the time and place and cir-
cumstances of the birth, that they were enabled, with little or no
inquiry, to proceed directly to the place where the young child lay.
The Magi, on the other hand, were men of intelligence, education,
wealth. They had the leisure, and they possessed all the means for
prosecuting an independent research. To them no such full and
minute directory of conduct was supplied. What they could not
learn otherwise than by a divine revelation, was in that way commu-
THE VISIT OF THE MAGI. 47
nicated; but what they could learn by the use of ordinary means,
they were left in that way to find out. They repair to, and they
exhaust all the common sources of knowledge which lie open to them.
They go to Jerusalem as to the likeliest place ; they get there the
information as to the place of the Lord's birth; they act upon the
information thus obtained up to the farthest limit to which it can
carry them. They tarry not in the unbelieving city, as many might
have done, till further light was given them. They turn not the
incredulity of others into a ground of doubt, nor the incompleteness
of the intelligence afforded into a ground of discouragement and
delay. They know now that somewhere in Bethlehem the object of
their search is to be found, and if they fail in finding him, it will be
in Bethlehem that the failure shall take place. Nor is it till they are
on their way to that village, that the star of heavenly guidance once
more appears ; but then it does appear, and sends gladness into their
hearts.
And have we not all, as followers of the Crucified, another and
higher journey to perform ; a journey not to the place of the Saviour's
earthly birth, but that of his heavenly dwelling? And if, on that
journey, we act as those men did, God will deal with us as he dealt
with them. The path before us may be often hidden in obscurity ;
our lights may go out by the way; we may know as little of what the
next stage is to reveal, as those men knew at Jerusalem what awaited
them in their path to Bethlehem ; but if, like them, we hold on our
course, unmoved by the example of others; if we follow the light
given us to the farthest point to which that light can carry us, then
on us too, when lights all fail, and we seem about to be left in utter
darkness, some star of heavenly guidance will arise, at sight of which
we shall rejoice with an exceeding joy. Unto those that are thus
upright, there shall arise light in the darkness ; and to him that order-
eth thus his conversation aright, God shall show his salvation.
But look now at the chief priests and scribes of the holy city, into
whose hands the ancfent oracles of God had been specially commit-
ted. They could tell at once, from the prophecies of Micah, the place
of the Messiah's birth ; and they could almost as readily and as accu-
rately from the prophecies of Daniel have known the time of his
advent. To them, as furnished already with sufficient means of infor-
mation, no supernatural communication of any kind is made ; to them
no angel comes, no star appears, no sign is given. Had they but used
aright the means already in their hands, they should have been wait-
ing for the coming of the Lord, with ears all open to catch the first
feint rumors which must have reached Jerusalem from a village not
48 . THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
more than six miles off, of what the shepherds saw and heard ; they
should have been out to Bethlehem before these Magi came, ready
to welcome those visitors from a far country, and to conduct them
into the presence of their new-born King. But they neglected,
they abused the privileges they possessed ; and now, as the proper
fruit of their own doings, not only is the same kind of information
supplied to others denied to them, but the very way in which they
are first informed works disastrously, and excites hostile prejudices
in their breast. " Where is he," these strangers say to them, " who
is born King of the Jews?" Has an event like this occurred —
occurred within a few miles of the metropolis — and they, the heads
and rulers of the Jewish people, not know of it ! For their first
knowledge of it must they be indebted to these foreigners, men igno-
rant of Judea, unread in their sacred books ! A star, forsooth, these
men said, had appeared to them in the East; was it to be believed
that for them, in their land of heathen darkness and superstition, such
a fresh fight should be kindled in the heavens, while to God's own
appointed priesthood no discovery of any kind had been made ? We
discern thus in its very earliest stage, that antipathy to the son of
Mary which, beginning in incredulity and fostered by pride, grew
into malignant hatred, and issued in the nailing of Jesus to the cross.
And even in the first stage of the course they followed, they appear
before us reaping the fruit of their former doings, and sowing the
seeds of their after crimes ; for it is thus that the husbandry of wick-
edness goes on — the seed-time and the harvest, the sowing and the
reaping going on together. What a singular spectacle does the proud
and jealous priesthood of Judea thus present, learned in the letter of
their own Scriptures, but wholly ignorant of their spirit; pointing the
way to others, not taking a single step in it themselves ; types of the
nation they belonged to, of the function which the Jews have so
largely since discharged — the openers of the door to Gentile inqui-
rers, the closers of that door upon themselves.
We rejoin now the Magi at Bethlehem. They enter the indicated
house, and stand before a mother and her child: a mother of very
humble appearance; a child clad in simplest attire. Can this, they
think, as they look around, be the roof beneath which infant royalty
lies cradled ! Can that be the child they have come so far to see and
worship ! Had they known all about that infant which we now know ;
had they known that an angelic choir had already sung his birth,
lading the midnight breezes with a richer freight of melody than they
had ever wafted through the skies ; had they known that in that fit-
tie hand which lav folded there in feebleness, in the gentle breath
THE VISIT OF THE MAGI. 49
which was heaving that infant bosom, the power of omnipotence lay
slumbering — that at the touch of the one, the blind eye was to open
and the tied tongue to be unloosed — that at the bidding of the other,
I he wildest elements of nature in their stormiest march were to stand
still, devils were to be driven out from their usurped aj r T es, and the
dead to come forth from the sepulchre ; had they known that at the
death of this Son of Mary the sun was to be darkened, the rocks
were to be rent, and the graves to give up their old inhabitants — thai
he himself was to burst the barriers of the tomb, and rise in triumph
attended by an angel escort, to take his place at the right hand of the
Majesty in the heavens — we should not have wondered at the ready
homage which they rendered to him. But they knew nothing of alJ
this. What they did know we cannot tell. We only know that
instantly, in absence of all outward warrant for the act, in spite of
the most unpromising appearances, they bow the knee before that
undistinguished infant, lower than it bent before the haughty Herod
at Jerusalem ; bow in adoration such as they never rendered to any
earthly sovereign. And that act of worship over, they open their
treasures and present to him their gifts : the gold, the frankincense,
and the myrrh, the rarest products of the East; an offering such as
any monarch might have had presented to him by the ambassadors
from any foreign prince. When we take the whole course of these
men's conduct into account ; when we remember that they had none
of the advantages of a Jewish birth or education, of an early acquaint-
ance with the Jewish Scriptures ; when we think of their starting on
their long and perilous journey with no other object than the making
of this single obeisance to the infant Eedeemer of mankind; when
we look at them standing unmoved amid all the discouragements of
the Jewish metropolis; when we attend them on their solitary way
to Bethlehem ; when we stand by their side, as beneath that lowly
roof they silently worship, and spread out their costly gifts — we can-
not but regard their faith as in many of its features unparalleled in
the gospel narrative ; we cannot but place them in the front rank oi
that goodly company in whose acts the power and the triumph of a
simple faith shine forth.
That single act of homage rendered, they return to their own
country, and we hear of them no more. They come like spirits, cast-
ing no shadow before them; and like spirits they depart, passing
away into that obscurity from which they had emerged. But our
affection follows them to their native land — would fain penetrate the
secret of their after lives and deaths. Did these men see and hoar
and know no more of Jesus? Were they living when — after thirty
Life of Christ. 4
50 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
years of profoundest silence, not a rumor of his name going any-
where abroad — tidings came at last of the words he spake, the deeds
he did, the death he died ? We would fain believe, so far, the quaint
old legend of the middle ages, that connects itself with the fancied
resting-place of their relics in the Cathedral of Cologne ; we would
tain believe that they lived to converse with one of the apostlas of
the Lord, and to receive Christian baptism at his hands. However
it may have been, we can scarce believe that He whose star carried
them from their eastern homes to Bethlehem, and whose Spirit
prompted the worship they then rendered, left them to die in hea-
then ignorance and unbelief. Let us cherish rather the belief that
they who bowed so reverently before the earthly cradle, are now wor-
shipping with, a profounder reverence before the heaveDly throne.
But what special significance has this incident in the early life of
oar Redeemer? Why were these men summoned from their distant
homes to come so far to pay that single act of homage to the infant
Jesus, and then retire for ever from our sight ? Why, but that even
with the first weak beginnings of the Saviour's earthly life, there
might be a foretokening of the wide embrace of that kingdom he
came to establish ; a first fulfilling of those ancient prophecies which
had foretold that the Gentiles should come to this light, and kings to
the brightness of its rising; that all they from Sheba should come,
bringing gold and incense. These eastern Magi were the earliest
ambassadors from heathen lands, the first shadowy precursors of
that great company to be gathered in from the east, and from the
west, and from the north, and from the south, to sit down with Abra-
ham in the kingdom of the just. In these persons and in their act
the Gentile world, of which they formed a part, gave an early wel-
come to the Eedeemer, and hastened to lay its tribute at his feet.
They were, in fact — and this should bind them the closer to our
hearts — they were our representatives at Bethlehem, making for us
Gentiles the first expression of our faith, the first offer of our alle-
giance. Let us rightly follow up what they did in our name. First,
they worshipped, and then they gave the best and richest things they
had. The gold, the frankincense, the myrrh had been of little worth
had the worship of the heart not gone before and sanctified the gift.
But the gift most appropriately followed the worship. First, then,
let us give ourselves to the Lord, our heart the first oblation that we
proffer ; for the heart once given, the hand will neither be empty noi
idle, nor will it grudge the richest thing that it can hold, nor the bes*
service it can render.
THE MASSACBE OF THE INNOCENTS. 51
V.
The Massacre of the Innocents, and the Flight
into Egypt*
There are three Herods who appear prominently in the pages of
the New Testament. First, Herod the Great, the son of a crafty and
wealthy Idumean or Edomite, who, during the reign of the last of
the Asmonean princes, attained to great political influence in Judea,
securing for his eldest son Phasael the governorship of Jerusalem;
and for Herod, his younger son, the chief command in Galilee. Pha-
sael was cut off in one of those political commotions which the
raising of a foreign family to such an elevated position engendered;
but Herod escaped all the perils to which he was thus exposed, dis-
tinguished himself by his address and bravery, showed great politi-
cal foresight in allying himself closely with the power which he saw
was to prevail in Judea as over all other lands, sought and won the
personal friendship of Cassius and of Mark Antony, and, mainly by
the influence of the latter, was proclaimed king of the Jews.
Second, Herod Antipas, a son of this first Herod, who, in that
division of his father's kingdom which took place at his decease,
became tetrarch of Galilee and Perea. This was the Herod who so
often appears in the narrative of our Lord's ministry, who at first
heard John the Baptist gladly, but who afterwards gave the order
for his execution ; who happened to be in Jerusalem at the time of
Christ's trial and condemnation, and who was brought then into suet
singular contact with Jesus.
Third, Herod Agrippa, a grandson of the first Herod, though not
a son of Herod Antipas, who was invested by the Komans with the
royal dignity, and ruled over all the country which had been subject
to his grandfather. This was the Herod who appears in the history
of the Acts of the Apostles ; who stretched forth his hands to vex
certain of the church; who killed James, the brother of John, with
the sword ; who, because he saw that it pleased the Jews, proceeded
to take Peter also; and whose awful death so soon afterwards at
Ca sarea St. Luke has so impressively recorded.
Our Saviour, we know, was born near the end of the long reign
of the first of these Herods ; and the latest and most successful inves-
tigations of the chronology of Christ's life have taught us to believe
*;hat it was in the last year of Herod's reign, and close upon that
« Matt. 2 : 13-23.
52 THE LIFE OE CHRIST.
monarch's last illness and death, that the birth at Bethlehem took
place. The terrible malady which made his closing scene not less
awful than that of his grandson Agrippa had already begun its work,
and given forewarning of the fatal issue. He was in a moody, suspi-
cious, vengeful state of feeling. His reign had long been outwardly
biilliant and prosperous. He had defeated all the schemes of his
political opponents. With a firm and cruel hand, he had kept doAvn
all attempts at intestine revolt. By a large remission of taxation, by
extraordinary liberality in times of famine, by lavish expenditure on
public works, the erection of new cities and the rebuilding of the
temple at Jerusalem, he had sought to dazzle the public eye and
win the public favor. But nothing could quench the Jewish suspi-
cion of him as an Eclomite. This suspicion fed upon his attempts to
introduce and encourage heathen games and pastimes, and grew
intensely bitter as it watched with what unrelenting hate he perse-
cuted and cut off all the members of that Maccabean family whose
throne he had usurped, around whom Jewish gratitude and hope still
fondly clung. This ill-concealed enmity preyed upon the proud, dark
spirit of Herod. It taught him to see his deadliest foes in the bosom
of his own family. Passionately attached to her, he had married tho
beautiful but ill-fated Mariamne, the daughter of Alexander, one o|
the Asmonean princes. She inherited the pride and ambition of her
family; bitterly resenting, as well she might, the secret order which
she discovered Herod had issued, that ^he should be cut off if he
failed to secure the throne for himself in the embassage to Kome
which he undertook after the defeat of Mark Autony, his first patron.
Her resentment of this order had the worst interpretation put upon
it, and in the transport of a jealousy in which both personal and
political elements were combined, Herod ordered her to be beheaded.
Then followed those transports of remorse which, for a time, bereft
the frantic prince of reason. Mariamne gone, the father's jealousy
was directed to his two sons by her, in whose veins the hated Asmo-
nean blood was flowing. He sent for Antipater, his son by the wife
he had divorced in order to marry Mariamne, and set him up as their
rival and his successor. But the popular favor clung to Alexander
and Aristobulus, the sons of the murdered Mariamne. Herod's court
and family became a constant gloomy scene of dissension and dis-
trust. Charges of treasonable designs on the part of Alexander and
Aristobulus against his person and government were secretly poured
into the ear of Herod. Men of inferior rank, supposed to be impli-
cated, were seized, tortured, and executed, till at last, by their father's
own order the two young princes, then in the flower of their early
THE MASSACEE OF THE INNOCENTS. O'J
manhood, were strangled. Antipater had been the chief instrument in
urging Herod on to this inhuman deed, and now in that very son whom
he had done so much for he found the last worst object of his jealous
wrath. Antipater was proved to have conspired to poison his old,
doting, diseased, and dying father. He was summoned to Jerusa-
lem. Herod raised himself from his bed of suffering, and gave tho
order for his execution. His own death drew on. It maddened him
to think that there would be none to mourn for him; that at his
death there would be a general jubilee. The fiendish idea seized
him, that if there were none who voluntarily would weep for him,
there should at least be plenty of tears shed at his death; and so
his last command — a command happily not executed — was, that the
heads of all the chief families in Judea should be assembled in the
Hippodrome, and that as soon as it was known that he had drawn
his last breath they should be mercilessly slaughtered; and thus, his
body consumed by inward ulcers and his spirit Avith tormenting pas-
sions, Herod died.
I have recited thus much of this king's history, that you may see
in what harmony with his other doings was his massacre of the inno-
cents at Bethlehem. When he heard of the coming of the Magi and
of the birth of this new King of the Jews, the sceptre was already
dropping from his aged and trembling hands.* But as the dying
hand of avarice clutches its gold the firmer as it feels the hour draw
on when it must give it up, so did the dying hand of ambition clutch
the sceptre, and he determined that if he could hold it no longer, he
would at least try to cut off all who might claim to wield it at hi3
death. A lifetime's practice had made him a proficient in craft. He
inquired privily of the wise men as to the time at which the star
appeared. Had he even then, when he made this inquiry, matured
his bloody project ; and did he wish, by knowing the precise time of
the star's appearance, to assure himself of the exact age of the child
he intended to destroy; or was the inquiry made for the purpose of
ascertaining whether any like star had been seen anywhere in Judea,
seeking thus to confirm or invalidate what the wise men said ? This
only we can say, that if it were but a few days after the birth of Jesus
that the Magi visited Jerusalem, and if the order that Herod after-
wards issued to his executioners was founded on the information
given him as to the time of the star's appearance, then the first
appearance of the star must have been coincident, not with the birth
of Jesus, but with the annunciation of that birth to Mary. Herod
may have fancied from what he learned from the Magi that the child
* He was seventy years old when he died.
54 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
must now be about a year old, and giving a broad margin that no
chance of escape might be given, his order ran that all under two
years of age should be destroyed.
Perhaps, however, Herod's only object in his first private inter-
view with the Magi was to extract from them all the information he
could, with no precise or definite purpose as to how he should act
upon the information so obtained. When he told them to go and
search diligently for the child, and when they had found him, to
come and bring him word, it was not with any purpose on his part
to go and worship him ; in saying that he meant to do so, we may
well believe him to have been playing the hypocrite ; but neither
may it have been with an already fixed resolution to act as he after-
wards did. But the wise men did not return; he ascertained that
they had been in Bethlehem, that they had left that place, that with-
out coming to see him and report as to the result of their search,
they were already beyond his reach on their way back to their dis-
tant home. The birth was, by this very circumstance, made all tho
surer in his eyes, and to his natural alarm at such a birth, there was now
added bitter chagrin at being mocked in this way by these strangers.
Had they seen through the mask which he imagined he had fash-
ioned so artfully and worn so well ? Nothing galls the crarfty more
than when their craft is discovered, and the discovery is turned
against themselves. Angry with the men who had treated him thus,
Herod is angry, too, with himself for having given them the oppor-
tunity to outwit him. Why had he not sent some of his own trusty
servants with them to Bethlehem ? Why had he been so foolish as
to trust these foreigners? Irritated at them, irritated at himself,
determined that this child shall not escape, he sends his bandits out
upon their bloody errand.
That errand was to be quickly and stealthily executed. In so
small a village as Bethlehem, and in the thinly scattered population
which lay around it, there could be but a few male infants under two
years old. It is but one of the dreams of the middle-age imagina-
tion which has swelled the numbers of the slaughtered to thousands ;
one or two dozens would be nearer to the mark. A few practised
hands such as Herod could easily secure would have little diffi-
culty in finishing their work in the course of one forenoon. It was
spring-time of the year;* the parents were busy in the fields; ihe
unprotected homes lay open. Before any concerted resistance could
be offered, half the childrer might be slain. Every precaution, we
* It has been accurately ascertained that Herod must have died between the
13th March and the 4th April, Y5u a. o. a.
THE MASSACFvE OF THE INNOCENTS. 55
may believe, was taken by Herod that it should not be known at
whose instance the deed was done. He was too wily a politician to
make any such public manifestation of his vindictive alarm as his
sending forth a company of executioners, clothed visibly with the
royal authority, would have made. But secretly, promptly, vigor-
ously as his measures were taken, they came too late. When told
that not a male child of the specified age had been permitted to
escape, he may have secretly congratulated himself on that peril to
his government being thus summarily set aside. But an eye more
vigilant than his was watching over the safety of the infant Jqsus.
In a dream of the night the angel of the Lord had appeared io
Joseph ; told him of the impending peril, and specially directed him
as to the manner of escape. Without an hour's delay, the warning
given was acted on. The journey from Bethlehem to the nearest
part of Egypt was soon performed,, and secured from the stroke of
Herod's bandits and placed beyond the after-reach of Herod's wrath,
the child was safe. The flight was hasty, and the sojourn in Egypt
was but short.* The way for the return was open, and in fulfilment
of his promise, the angel came to Joseph to tell him that they were
dead who sought the young child's life. Struck by all the circum-
stances which had accompanied the birth there, Joseph and Mary
had perhaps resolved to take up their residence in Bethlehem. But
on entering Judea they heard that though Herod was dead, his son
Archelaus ruled in his stead ; a prince who early proved that the
spirit of his father had descended on him, one of the first acts of his
reign being the slaughter of three thousand of his countrymen in
Jerusalem. The apprehensions of Joseph were verified by the angel's
once more appearing to him in a dream, and directing him to pass on
through Judea, and take up his abode again in Nazareth, a hamlet in
the province of Galilee.
In the narrative of this passage of our Lord's infant life as given
by St. Matthew, two things strike us.
1, The prominent part assigned to, and assumed by Joseph as the
earthly guardian of the child ; the frequency, the minuteness, and the
manner in which these divine intimations were made to him on which
he acted. In every instance it was in a dream of the night that the
heavenly warning came. Nor was the warning in any instance vague,
but remarkably definite and satisfactory. He was told at first not
* Accepting either the close of the year 749 a. u. o. or the beginning of 750
A. u. o. os the most probable date of the birth of Christ, and assuming that the
fisit of the Magi succeeded the presentation in the temple, the stay in Egypt
xmid hftve been but shoii.
56 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
simply that danger was at hand; he was told specifically what that
danger was: " Herod will seek the young child to destroy him." He
was told not simply to escape from Bethlehem, but to flee into Egypt;
of Herod's death he got timely information, and while hesitating as
to what he should do on his return into Judea, he had his doubts
removed and his fears allayed by another divine direction. Are we
wrong in interpreting the heavenly messenger's manner of acting
towards the foster-parent of our Saviour as indicative of a very
watchful and tender solicitude on Joseph's part for the safety of that
strange child to whom he was united by so strange a tie ? He ap-
pears as the heaven-appointed, heaven-instructed sentinel, set to
watch over the infant days of the Son of the Highest, chosen for this
office, and aided in its discharge, not without such regard to his per-
sonal qualifications as is ordinarily shown under the divine govern-
ment in the selection of fit agents for each part of the earthly work.
We are led thus to think of him as taking an almost more than
paternal interest in the babe committed to his care, thinking about
him so much and so anxiously by day that his dreams by night are
of him, and that it is in these dreams the angel comes to give the
needed guidance, and to seal, as it were, by the divine approval the
watchful care by which the dreams had been begotten. And we are
the more disposed to think thus favorably of Joseph as we reflect
upon the peculiar relationship in which he stood to Jesus, and re-
member that this is the only glimpse we get of the manner in which
the duties of that relationship were discharged. In the. record of our
Lord's ministry he never appears. The conclusion seems natural that
he had died before that ministry began. It is only in his connection
with the birth and infancy and childhood of Jesus that any sight of
Joseph is obtained, and it pleases us to think that he who was hon-
ored to be the guardian of that sacred life in the first great peril to
which it was exposed, w r as one not unworthy of the trust, but who
lovingly, faithfully, tenderly executed it.
2. In reading this portion of the gospel of St. Matthew, we are
struck with the frequent references to the history and prophecies of
the Old Testament. Such references are peculiar to St. Matthew,
and they are due to the character of those to whom his gospel was
especially addressed, and to the object he had especially in view. His
gospel was written for converted Jews, and his great aim was fcc
present to such Jesus Christ as the Messiah promised to their fathers.
Continually, therefore, throughout his narrative, as almost nowhe v t>
in the narratives of the other evangelists, he quotes from the Old
Testament Scriptures with the view of showing how accurately and
THE MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS. 57
completely they were fulfilled in the life and death of Jesus of Naza-
reth. The very formula, " that it might be fulfilled," is peculiar to
the first gospel. The method thus followed by St. Matthew was ad-
mirably fitted to soothe the prejudices of Jewish converts, and estab-
lish them in a true faith in Christ. Thus it is that in the passage
cow before us, he attempts to obviate objections that might naturally
arise in Jewish minds, on then being told of such events — to them so
untoward and unlooked for — in the life of the infant Messiah as his
being forced to find a temporary retreat in the land of Egypt, the
slaughter of so many infants on his account, and the fixing of his
abode in a remote hamlet of Galilee. Nothing could be more calcu-
lated to allay any prejudice created by the recital of such incidents
than to point to parallel or analogous ones in the history of ancient
Israel. The three citations of this kind which Sfc. Matthew makes
differ somewhat in their character. Of only one of them is it cer-
tain that there was a literal fulfilment of a prophecy uttered with im-
mediate and direct reference to Christ. He came and dwelt, it is
said, in Nazareth, " that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by
the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene." Yet it is singular that
this prophecy, which was obviously one spoken directly of the Mes-
siah, is nowhere to be found in the Old Testament Scriptures as they
now are in our hands. But this hinders not our belief that by some
one or other of the ancient prophets the words that St. Matthew
quotes had been spoken. As Jude recites and verifies a prophecy of
Enoch of which otherwise Ave should have been ignorant, as St. Paul
reports a saying of our Lord which otherwise should not have been
preserved, so St. Matthew here records a prophecy which but for his
citation of it would have perished.
It is different, however, with the other two citations from ancient
prophecy. These we can readily lay our hands upon, and in doing
so become convinced that St. Matthew did not and could not mean
to assert that in the events which he related they had directly and
literally been verified. His object was rather to declare — and that
was sufficient — that the incidents to which those old prophecies did
in the first instance refer, were not only kindred in character, but
were typical or symbolically prophetic of those which he was describ-
ing in the life of Jesus. He quotes thus a part of that verse in the
llti chapter of Hosea which runs thus: "When Israel was a child,
then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt." If that ancient
Israel of which the Lord said, "He is my son," "He is my first-
born," while yet he was as it were but an infant, was carried down
into and thereafter brought safe out of Egypt, was it a strange thing
58 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
that He who was Jehovah's own and only Son, the First-born among
many brethren, of whom and of whose church that Israel was a type,
should in his infancy have to pass through a like ordeal of persecu-
tion and of deliverance? The point of the fulfilment of the prophecy
her6 alleged does not lie in Hosea's having Christ actually and per-
sonally in his eye when he penned the words quoted by St. Matthew,
but in the fact related by Hosea having a typical reference to a like
fact in that after history which stands shadowed forth throughout in
the outward history of ancient Israel.
It is in the same way that we are to understand the quotation
from the 31st chapter of the prophecies of Jeremiah. It is in direct
connection with his statement of the fact that Herod sent forth and
slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, from two years old and
under, that St. Matthew says, "Then was fulfilled that which was
spoken by Jeremy the prophet." " Matthew," says Calvin, " does not
mean that the prophet had predicted what Herod should do, but that
at the advent of Christ that mourning was renewed which many ages
before the children of Benjamin had made." Primarily the words of
the prophet referred to the carrying away of a large portion of the
tribes of Benjamin and Judah captives to Babylon. In describing
the bitter grief with which the heart of the country was then smitten,
Jeremiah, by a figure as bold as it is picturesque and impressive,
summons the long-buried Rachel, the mother of Benjamin, from her
grave, representing her as roused from the sleep of ages to bewail the
captivity of her children. But Bachel's grave lay near to Bethlehem,
and now another bitter woe had come upon the land in the murder
of those innocents in that village ; and what more natural than that
St. Matthew should revive, re-appropriate, and re-apply that image of
Jeremiah, representing Rachel as anew issuing from her tomb to weep
over these her slaughtered children.
But there was something more here than a mere apposite applica-
tion to a scene of recent sorrow of a poetical image that originally
referred to the grief caused by the captivity. That very grief which
filled the land of Judah may have been intended to prefigure the
lamentation that now filled Bethlehem and all its borders. Bachel
rising from her tomb, and filling the air then with her lamentations,
may have been meant to stand as a type or representative of these
mothers of Bethlehem, all torn in heart by the snatching of their
little ones from their struggling arms and the killing of them before
their eyes. If it be so, then that passage in Jeremiah speaks of some-
thing more than of the mere suffering inflicted and the sorrow it pro-
Iiioed. The weeping Bachel is not suffered to weep on, to weep out
THE MASSACRE OF THE INNOCENTS. 59
her grief. There are words of comfort for her in her tears. There is
a message from the Lord to her that speaks in no ambiguous terms
of the after destiny, the future restoration of those children so rudely
torn from their maternal embrace. For what are the words which
immediately follow those which St. Matthew has quoted: "Thus saitl
the Lord, Kefrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes from tears
for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the Lord ; and they shall come
again from the land of the enemy. And there is hope in thine end,
saith the Lord, that thy children shall come again to their own bor-
der." If we have any right to apply this part of the prophecy to this
incident of the evangelic history, then may we take the words that I
have quoted as carrying with them the assurance that those children
who perished under the stroke of Herod's hirelings died not spiritual-
ly ; that they shall come again from the land of the last enemy, come
again with Him whose birth was so mysteriously connected with their
death. We know that those infants, whose ghastly remains the weep-
ing mothers gathered up to lay in their untimely graves, shall rise
again in the resurrection at the last day. To them that resurrection,
itself a fruit of the Saviour's advent, must come as a boon, a benefit,
not as a bane or curse. They will rise to eternal life. To believe
otherwise of them, and of all who die in infancy, would be to believe
that those who are called away from this world while yet the first
dewdrops of life are on them, are placed thereby in a worse condi-
tion than that in which it is the declared purpose of the gospel to
place all mankind. It is a belief which we cannot adopt. Our assur-
ance is clear, and, as we think, well grounded— though these grounds
we cannot now pause to unfold — that all who die in infancy are saved.
Distinguished among them all, let us believe this of those slaughtered
babes of Bethlehem. Their fate was singularly wrapped up with that
of the infant Saviour. The stroke that fell on them was meant for him ;
the sword of persecution which swept so mercilessly in many an after
age through the ranks of Christ's little ones was first reddened in
their blood. The earliest victims to hatred of the Nazarene — if not
consciously and willingly, yet actually dying for him — let us count
them as the first martyrs for Jesus, and let us believe that in them
the truth of the martyrs' motto was first made good, "Near to the
sword, near to God." u O blessed infants!" exclaims Augustine;
" He who at his birth had angels to proclaim him, the heavens to tes-
tify, and Magi to worship him, could surely have prevented that these
should have died for him, had he not known that they died not in
thai- death, but rather lived in higher bliss."
SO THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
VI.
The Thirty Years at Nazareth — Christ Among
The Doctors.*
Up among the hills of Galilee, in a basin surrounded by swelling
eminences, which shut it in on every side, lies the little village of
Nazareth. Its name does not occur in Old Testament history. Jose-
ph us never mentions it, though he speaks of places lying all around
it. Its inhabitants were not worse than their neighbors, nor exposed
on account of their character to any particular comtempt, yet Natha-
nael, himself a Galilean, could say, "Can there any good thing come
out of Nazareth?" so small and insignificant was the place. It was
here, as in a fit retreat, that the childhood, youth, and early manhood
of our Lord passed quietly and unnoticed away. Those thirty years
of the life of the Son of God upon this earth, how deeply hidden from
us do they he ! how profound the silence regarding them which the
sacred writers preserve! a silence all the more remarkable when we
consider how natural and strong is our desire to know something, to
be told something of the earlier days of any one who, at some after
period of his life, has risen to distinction. But all that here is told us
of the first twelve years of our Saviour's life is that the child grew,
waxed strong in spirit, was filled with wisdom, and that the grace of
God was upon him. Had any of those wonders which attended his
birth been renewed, had any thing supernatural occurred in the
course of those years, we may presume it would have been related or
alluded to. Nothing of that kind we may infer did happen. Out-
wardly and inwardly the growth of Jesus under Mary's care at Naz-
areth, obeyed the common laws under which human infancy and
childhood are developed. Beyond that gentle patience which noth-
ing could ruffle, that simple truthfulness which nothing could turn
aside ; beyond that love which was always ready to give back smile
for smile to Mary and the rest around, and to go forth rejoicingly on
its little errands of kindness within the home of the carpenter; be-
yond that wisdom which, wonderful as it was, was childlike wisdom
still, growing as his years grew, and deriving its increase from all
the common sources which lay open to it ; beyond the charm of all
the graces of childhood in their full beauty and in their unsullied per-
fection — there was nothing externally to distinguish his first twelve
years. So we conclude from the absence of all notices of them in tk«
• Luke 2 : 40-52.
THE THIETY YEAKS AT NAZAEETH. 61
gospel narrative. Of the void thus left, however, the Christian church
became early impatient. Many attempts were made to fill it up. In
the course of the first four centuries numerous pseudo-gospels were in
circulation, a long list of which has been made up out of references to
them which occur in the preserved writings of that period.* Some of
these apocryphal gospels are still extant, two of them entitled the
Gospel of the Infancy ; and it is very curious to notice how those suc-
ceeded who tried to lift the veil which covers the earlier years of
Christ. One almost feels grateful that such early attempts were
made to fill up the blank which the four Evangelists have left.f
They enable us to cootrast the simplicity, and naturalness and con-
sistency of all that the Evangelists have recorded of Christ, with such
empty and unmeaning tales. They do more. These apocryphal gos-
pels were written by men who wished to honor Christ in all they said
about him ; by men who had that portraiture of his character before
them which the four gospels supply ; and yet we find them narrating,
as being in what seemed to them entire harmony with tliat character,
that when boys interrupted Jesus in his play, or ran against him in
the street of the village, he looked upon them and denounced them,
and they fell down and died. It was said, I believe by Eousseau, that
the conception and delineation of such a character as that of the
man Christ Jesus, by such men as the fishermen of Galilee, would
have been a greater miracle than the actual existence of such a man.
In these apocryphal gospels we have a singular confirmation o± that
saying; we have the proof that men better taught, many of them,
than the apostles, even when they had the full delineation of the
Q See Jones on the Canon.
f These Gospels of the Infancy of our Lord are full of miracles of the most
frivolous description, miracles represented as wrought first by the simple pres-
ence of the infant, by the clothes he wore, the water in which he was washed,
wrought afterwards by the Son of Mary himself as he grew up at Nazareth, many
alleged incidents of his boyhood there being gravely related : as when we are told
that he and the other children of the village went out to play together, busying
themselves in making clay into the shapes of various birds and beasts, where-
upon Jesus commanded his beasts to walk, his birds to fly, and so excelled them
all ; or again, when we are told that passing by a dyer's shop he saw many pieces
of cloth laid out to be dyed, all of which he took and flung into a neighboring
furnace, throwing the poor owner of the shop into an agony of consternation and
grief, and then pleasantly relieving him by drawing all the pieces out of the fur-
nace each one now of the very color which had been desired. Such are the speci-
mens, chosen chiefly because they are the least absurd of the many which are
recorded in these gospels. It was thus, as these writers would exhibit it, thai
the early boyhood of our Lord was spent ; it was by miracles such as those whidb
I have recited, that he even then distinguished himself.
62 THE LIFE OF OHEIST.
manliood of Jesus in their hands, could not attempt a fancy sketch of
his childhood without not only violating our sense of propriety, by
attributing to him the most puerile and unmeaning displays of divine
power, but shocking our moral sense, and falsifying the very picture
they had before their eyes, by attributing to him acts of vengeance.
Joseph and Mary "went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of
the Passover.'' The Mosaic law required that all the male inhab-
itants of Judea should go up three times yearly to the capital, to
keep the three great festivals of the Passover, Pentecost, and Taber-
nacles. A later Rabbinical authority had laid an injunction upon
women to attend the feast of the Passover. Living as they did in so
remote a part of the country, it is probable that the parents of our
Lord satisfied themselves with going up together once yearly to Jeru-
salem; Joseph thus doing less, and Mary more than the old law
enjoined. When Jesus was twelve years old, Joseph and Mary took
him up with them to Jerusalem. He had then reached that age,
when, according to Jewish reckoning, he crossed the line which
divides childhood from youth, got the new name of a son of the Lord,
and had he been destined to any public office, would have passed into
the hands of the Rabbis for the higher instructions which their
schools supplied. Jesus, however, had received no other instruction
than the village school, attached to the synagogue at Nazareth, had
supplied, and was destined to no higher employment than that of the
trade his father followed. The purpose of Joseph and Mary in
taking him up with them to Jerusalem was not that he might be
placed at the feet of Gamaliel, or any other of the great distinguish-
ed teachers of the metropolis, but simply that he might see the horj
city, and take part with them in the sacred services of the Pass-
over.
There a new world opened to the boy's wondering eyes. With
what interest must he have looked around, when first he trod the
courts of the temple, and gazed upon the ministering priests, the
altar with its bleeding sacrifice and rising incense, the holy place, and
the secret shrine that lay behind the veil. The places, too, of which
we shall have to speak immediately, where youths of his own age
were to be found, would not be left unvisited. What thoughts were
stirred within his breast by all these sights, it becomes us not even
to attempt to imagine. The key is not in our hands with which we
might unlock the mysteries of his humanity at this stage of its devel-
(/pment. He has himself so far unveiled his thoughts and feelings
as to teach us how natural it was that he should linger in the holy
city, and undei the power of a new attraction feel for a day or two an
THE THIETY YEAKS AT NAZARETH. 63
if the ties that bound him to Nazareth and to his home there were
broken.
The seven days of the feast went by. It had been a crowded
procession from Galilee which Joseph and Mary had joined. Galilee
was then, as Josephus informs us, very thickly populated, studded
with no less than two hundred and forty towns, containing each
fifteen thousand inhabitants or more, sending forth in the war with
the Eomans an army of no less than one hundred thousand men.
The separate companies which this crowded population sent up at
the Passover time to Jerusalem would each be large, and as the
youths of the company consorted and slept near one another in the
course of the journey, it is the less surprising that, on leaving Jerusa-
lem to return to Nazareth, Joseph and Mary should not during the
day have missed their son, who had stayed behind, nor have become
aware of his absence till they sought for him among his companions
when they rested for the night. The discovery was a peculiarly dis-
tressing one. What if some oversight had been committed by them?
if they had failed to tell their son of the time of the departure, if they
had failed to notice whether he was among the other youths before
they left the city? They had such confidence in that child, who
never before in a single instance had done any thing to create anxiety
or distrust; they were so sure that he would be where, as they
thought, he ought to be, that they had scarcely felt perhaps an ordi-
nary degree of parental solicitude. And where could he now be;
what could have happened to him? Their eager inquiries would
probably soon satisfy them that he had not fallen aside by the way,
that he had never joined the returning travellers, that he must have
remained behind in Jerusalem. But with whom? for what? He
knew no friends there with whom to stay. Had some accident be-
fallen him ? was he detained against his will ? Did any one at Jeru-
salem know the secrets of his birth ; were there any there who still
sought the young child's life? Herod was dead; Archelaus was
banished; the parents themselves had not been in Jerusalem since
the time they had presented the infant in the temple. It was noi
likely they should be recognized ; none of their friends at Nazareth
knew about the mysteries of the conception and the birth. They
had thought there was no risk in taking Jesus with them, but now
their hearts are full of dark forebodings; some one may have known,
may have told ; some secret design may stiil have been cherished
Where was their child, and what had happened to him?
You may imagine what a night of sleepless anxiety followed their
discovery at the first nightly resting-place of the caravan. Midday
64t THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
saw them hack in the city. It is said to have "been after three days
search they found him; if we count the day of their return as one of
these three, there would still be one entire day's fruitless search.
There may have been two such days — days of eager inquiry every-
where throughout the city, in the house where they had lived, among
all those with whom they had had any converse or connection. At
last they find the lost one, not in the courts of the temple, not in
any of those parts of the edifice consecrated to public worship, tut
in one of those apartments in the outer buildings used as a school of
the Kabbis. Among the Jews at this period, each synagogue had a
schoolroom attached to it, in which the rudiments of an ordinary
education were taught. Besides, however, these schools for primary
instruction, wherever there were ten men in a position to devote their
whole time to this purpose, a room was built for them, in which they
carried on their pupils in all the higher walks of the sacred learning
of the Jews. These constituted the schools of the Rabbis, and
formed an important instrument in the support and extension of that
system of Rabbinism which, as Milman tells us, "became, after the
ruin of the temple, and the extinction of public worship, a new bond
of national union, and the great distinctive feature in the character
of modern Judaism." There were three apartments employed in this
way attached to the temple. It was in one of these that Joseph and
Mary found their son. He was sitting in the ordinary attitude, and
engaged in the ordinary exercises of a pupil in the middle of the
doctors, hearing them and asking them questions — the Jewish method
of education being chiefly catechetical — the pupil himself sometimes
answering the questions put, and astonishing his hearers with his
wisdom. When this strange, plain-looking, bright-looking, solemn-
looking Galilean boy first came in among them, was it the wisdom he
then showed which drew the hearts of some of these Rabbis to him,
and led them, as if anxious to gain a scholar who might turn out to
be the chief ornament of their school, to take him in and treat him
tenderly? Was it with them, in the room they occupied in the outer
temple buildings, that the two nights in which Jesus was separate;!
from his parents were spent ? The tie, whatever it was, between him
and them, is now destined to be broken, never to be renewed.
Joseph and Mary find him in the midst of them. Joseph is too
much astonished to say any thing, nor is it likely that Mary spoke'
till he had gone with her apart; but now her burdened mother's
heart finds utterance. "Son," she says to him, " why hast thou thus
dealt with us?" words of reproach that were new to Mary's lips.
Never before had she to chide that child. Never before had he done
THE THIRTY YEARS AT NAZARETH. 65
any thing to require such chiding. But now, when it appears that
qo accident had happened, no restraint had been exercised, that it
bad been of his own free will that Jesus had parted from his parents,
and was sitting so absorbed by other persons and with other things,
she cannot account for such conduct on his part. It looks like neg-
lect, and worse ; like indifference to the pain which he must have
known this separation would cost them. "Son," she says, "why hast
thou thus dealt with us? Behold, thy father and I have sought thee
Borrowing."
Innocently, artlessly, childishly, in words which, though not meant
to meet the reproach with a rebuke, yet carried with them much of
the meaning and effect of the words spoken afterwards at the mar-
riage-feast at Cana, Jesus answers, "How is it that ye sought me?
could you, Mary, believe that I would act under other than heavenly
guidance ; could you allow the idea of my being liable to any risk or
danger simply because I was not under your eye and care ; do you
not know, were you not told whose Son I truly am ; and should not
chat knowledge have kept you from seeking and sorrowing as you
. have done ; wist you not, that wherever I was I must have been still
beneath that Father's eye and care — whatever I was about, I must
have been about that Father's business ? Mary, you have called me
Son, and I acknowledge the relationship ; you have called Joseph my
father; that relationship I disown; my own, my only Father is He in
whose house you have now found me, whose will I came on earth to
do ; about whose matters I must constantly, and shall now hence-
forth and for ever be engaged."
It is in this consciousness of his peculiar relationship to God, now
for the first time, perhaps, fully realized, that we catch the true
meaning, and can discern something of the purpose of this early, only
recorded incident in the history of our Lord's youth. Mary, we are
. told, understood not the answer of her son. With the knowledge
that she possessed, we can scarcely imagine that she had any diffi-
culty in at once perceiving that Jesus spake of his Father in heaven,
! and comprehending in so far at least the meaning of his words. But
(here may have been a special reason for Mary's surprise here — the
difficulty she felt of comprehension and belief. It cannot readily be
liraagined that she had herself told her child during the first twelve
I years of his life, or that any one else had told him, of the mystery of
J' lis birth. From the first dawning of conscious intelligence, he must
^ave been taught to call Joseph father, nor had it outwardly been
>mu ^unicated to him that he was only his reputed father, that
e ^ jrf no ^^hly parent, that his true and only father was God. If
6Q THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
that were the actual state of the connection between Mary and Jesus
up to the time of this incident in the temple; if she had never
breathed to him the great secret that he was none other than the
Son of the Highest ; if there had been nothing, as she knew there was
not, in the quiet tenor of the life which for twelve years Jesus lived,
to afford any outward indication or evidence, either to himself or
others, of the nature of his Sonship to God — then how surprised
must Mary have been when in the temple, and by that answer to
her question, Jesus informed her that he knew all, knew whence he
wa^j knew for what he came, knew that God was his Father in such
a sense that the discharge of his business carried with it an obligation
which, if the time and the season required, overbore all obligation to
real or reputed earthly parents.
But whether it came upon Mary by surprise or not, was there no
object in letting us and all believers in the Saviour know, as the
record of this incident does, that Jesus was thus early and fully alive
to the singularity of his relationship to God? Conceive that it had
been otherwise ; that these thirty years had been veiled in an impen-
etrable obscurity ; that not one single glimpse had been given of how
they passed away; that our first sight of the man Christ Jesus had
been when he stood before John to be baptized in the waters of the
Jordan, and to receive the Holy Ghost descending upon him. How
natural in that case had been the impression that it was then for the
first time, when the voice from heaven declared it, that he knew him-
self to be the Son of God ; that it was then, when the Spirit first
descended, that the Divine associated itself in close and ineffable
union with the human. Then had those thirty years appeared in a
quite different light to us ; then had we conceived of him as living
throughout their course the simple common life of a Galilean villager
and craftsman. But now we know, and we have to thank this narra-
tive of St. Luke for the information, that if not earlier, yet certainly
at his twelfth year, the knowledge that he and the Father were one,
that the Father was in him, and that he was in the Father, had
visited and filled his spirit, had animated and regulated his life.
With what a new sacredness and dignity do the eighteen years that
intervened between this incident and that of his public manifestation
to Israel become invested, and what new lessons of instruction do
they bring us. At the bidding of a new impulse, excited within his
youthful breast by this first visit to the temple, he breaks for a da?
or two all earthly bonds, and seems lost amid the shadows of the
Sanctuary, absorbed in the higher things of Him who was worshipped
there. But at the call of duty, his hour for public service, fox speak-
THE THIETY TEARS AT NAZARETH. 67
uig, acting, suffering, dying, before all, and for all, not yet come, he
yields at once to the desire of Joseph and Mary, and returns with
them to Nazareth; becoming subject to them, burying, as it were,
this great secret in his breast ; consenting to wait, submitting to all
lb 3 restraints of an ordinary household, putting himself once more
ander the yoke of parental authority, taking upon him all the com-
mon obligations of a son, a brother, a neighbor, a friend, a Galilean
villager, a Jewish citizen; disci larging ail without a taint of sin;
travelling not an inch beyond the routine of service expected in these
relationships ; doing absolutely nothing to betray the divinity that
lay within, nothing to distinguish hiinself above others, or proclaim
his heavenly birth; living so naturally, unostentatiously, undemon-
stratively, that neither did his brethren, the inmates of his home, his
own nearest relatives believe in him, discerning not in ail those years
any marks of his divine prophetic character; his name so little known
in the immediate neighborhood that Nathanael, who lived in Cana,
a few miles off, had never heard of him, and was quite unprepared
to believe Philip, when he told him, that in one Jesus of Nazareth
he had found him of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets,
did write.
From the bosom of that thick darkness which covers the first
thirty years of our Lord's earthly life, there thus shines forth the
light which irradiates- the whole period, and sheds over it a lustre
brighter than ever graced the life of any other of the children of men.
You may have wondered at this one event of his childhood being
redeemed from oblivion, so insignificant does it seem, and at first
sight so little correspondent with our preconceived conceptions of the
great Messiah's character and work. Looking at Jesus as nothing
more than the son of Joseph and Mary, there might be some diffi-
culty in explaining his desertion of them at Jerusalem. But when
you reflect on his self-recognition at this time as the Son of God ; on
his declaration of it to Mary; on his thenceforth acting on it in life;
>n his words in the temple, followed by eighteen years of self-denial,
and gentle, cheerful, prompt obedience; on his growing conscious-
ness of his divine lineage, and his earthly work and heavenly heri-
tage ; on the evils he came on earth to expose and remedy ; on the
selfishness, the worldliness, the formalism, the hypocrisy he detected
all around him at Nazareth ; when you reflect further on his divine
reticence, on his sublime and patient self-restraint, on his refraining
from all interference in public matters, and all exposure to public
notice, on his devoting himself instead to the tasks of daily duty in a
very humble sphere of life ; when you reflect fixedly and thoughtfully
68 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
on these things, do you not feel that there rests on this portion of the
life of Jesus, and upon its introductory and explanatory incident, an
interest different indeed in kind, yet in full and perfect harmony m ith
that belonging to the period when he stood forth as the Saviout of
the world? If he came to empty himself of that glory which he had
with the Father before the world was, to take upon him the form of
a servant, to seek not his own glory, to do not his own will, not to be
ministered unto but to minister, then assuredly it was not only during
the three years of his public ministry, but during all the three-asd-
fchirty years of his life on earth, that the ends of his mission were
accomplished.
We think, I apprehend, too little of these quiet domestic years of
secluded unpretending piety at Nazareth. Our eyes are dazzled by
the outward glory which surrounded his path when he burst at last
from his long concealment, and showed himself as the Son of the
Highest ; and yet there is a sense in which we should have more
interest in the earlier than in the later period of his life. It is liker
the life we have ourselves to lead. The Jesus of Nazareth is more of
a pattern to us than the Jesus of Gethsemane and the cross. He was
aot less the Son of God in the one case than in the other ; not less in
the one character than in the other has he left us an example that
we should follow his steps. It was thus the great lesson of his life
at Nazareth, as interpreted by his sayings in the temple, that we
should be doing our Father's business in the counting-house, in the
workshop, at the desk, as much as in any of the higher or more pub-
lic walks of Christian or philanthropic effort ; that a life confined and
devoted to the faithful execution of the simple, humble offices of daily
domestic duty, if n be a life of faith and love, may be one as full of
God, as truly divine and holy, as Christ-like and as honoring to
Christ, as a life devoted to the most important public services that
can be rendered to the church on earth. In the quiet and deep-lying
valleys of life, all hidden from human eye, who may tell us how many
there are, who, built up in a humble trust in Jesus, and animated by
their hope in him, are performing cheerfully their daily tasks because
a Father's wisdom has allotted them, and bearing patiently their
daily burdens because they have been imposed by a Father's love ?
Content to live and labor, and endure and die, unnoticed and un-
known, earthly fame hanging ro wreath upon their tomb, earthlj
eloquence dumb over their dust, these are they, the last among m*n,
who shall be among the first in the kingdom of the just.
THE EOBERUNNEH. 63
VII.
The Forerunner.*
The same angel who announced to Mary at Nazareth the birth ol
Jesus, had six months previously announced the birth of John to the
aged priest Zacharias, as he ministered before the altar, within the
temple at Jerusalem. Zacharias was informed that his wife Elisa-
beth shoidd have a son, whose name was to be John, who was to be
"great in the sight of the Lord," going before him "in the spirit and
power of Elias, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord."
Zacharias doubted what the angel said. At once as a punishment ol
his incredulity, and as a new token of the truth of the angelic mes-
sage, he was struck with a temporary dumbness. When he came
forth he could not tell his brother priests or the assembled people
any thing about what he had seen or heard within. From the signs
he made, and the strange awe-struck expression of his countenance,
they fancied he had seen a vision ; but it is not likely that he took
any means of correcting whatever false ideas they entertained. His
one wish was to get home and revea) the secret to his wife Elisabeth.
His days of ministration lasted but a week, and as soon as they were
over, he hastened to his residence in the hill country of Judea. In
due time what Gabriel had foretold took place. The child was born.
The eighth day, the day for its circumcision and the bestowing of its
name, arrived. A large circle of relatives assembled. They proposed
that the child should be called Zacharias, after his father. Foresee-
ing that some such proposal might be made, Zacharias had provided
against any other name than that assigned by the angel being given
to his son. Acting upon his instructions, Elisabeth interposed, and
declared that the child's name should be John. The relatives re-
monstrated. None of her kindred, they reminded her, had ever borne
that Dame. The dumb father was now by signs appealed to. He
called for a writing-table, and wrote the few decisive words, "His
name is John." They were ail wondering at the prompt and peremp-
tory settlement of this question, when another and greater ground of
wonder was supplied : the tongue of the dumb was loosed, and, in
rapt, rhythmical, prophetic strains that remind us forcibly of those in
which, three months before, and in the same dwelling, Mary and
Elisabeth had exchanged their greetings, he poured out fervent thanks
to God for having visited and redeemed his people, and foretold the
* Luke 1 : 1-18 ; Matt. 3 : 1-12 ; Mark 1 : IS.
TO THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
high office which his own newborn son was to execute as Forerunnei
of the Messiah.
"With that scene of the circumcision day the curtain drops upon
the household of Zacharias and Elisabeth ; nor is it lifted till many
years are gone, and then it is the child only, now grown to manhood
who appears. His parents had been well stricken in years at the
date of his birth, and as no mention of them is made afterwards, we
may presume that, like Joseph, they were dead before any tiling
remarkable in the life of their son had happened. Little as we know
of the first thirty years of the life of Jesus, we know still less of the
like period in the life of John. All that we are told is that till the
time of his showing unto Israel he was in the desert, in those wild
and lonely regions which lay near his birthplace, skirting the north-
western shores of the Dead sea. True to the angelic designation,
accepting the vow that marked him as a Nazarite from his birth,
John separated himself early from home and kindred, retired from
the haunts of men, buried himself in the rocky solitudes of the wil-
derness, letting his hair grow till it fell loose and dishevelled over his
shoulders, denying himself to all ordinary indulgences whether of
food or dress, clothing himself with the roughest kind of garment he
could get, a robe of hair-cloth, bound around him with a leathern
girdle, satisfying himself by feeding on the locusts and wild honey ol
the desert. But it was not in a morose or ascetic spirit that he did
so. He had not fled to those solitudes in chagrin, to nurse upon the
lap of indolence regrets over bygone disappointments ; nor had he
sought there to shroud his spirit in a religious gloom deep as that of
Engedi and Aclullam, which may have been among his haunts. His
whole appearance and bearing, words and actions, when at last he
stood forth before the people, satisfy us that there was little in him
of the mystic, the misanthrope, or the monk. Though dwelling
apart from others, avoiding observation, and shunning promiscuous
intercourse, he was not wasting those years in idleness, heedless
of the task for the performance of which the life he led was intend-
ed, as we presume he must have been informed by his parents, to
prepare him. Through the loopholes of retreat we can well imagine
the Baptist as busily scanning the state of that community upon
which he was to act. When he stepped forth from his retirement,
and men of all kinds and classes gathered round him, he did not need
any one to tell him who the Pharisees, or the Sadducees, or the pub-
licans were, or what were their peculiar and distinctive errors. He
appears from the first to have been well informed as to the state of
things outside the desert. It may, in truth, in no small measure have
THE FORERUNNER. 71
served to fit him for his peculiar work that — removed from all the
influences which must have served, had he lived among them, to
blunt his sense of surrounding evils, and to mould his character and
habits according to the prevailing forms and fashions of Jewish life —
he was carried by the Spirit into the desert to be trained and educa-
ted there, thence, as from a watch-tower, to look down upon those
strange sights which his country was presenting, undistractedly to
watch, profoundly to muse and meditate, the fervor of a true prophet
of the Lord kindling and glowing into an intenser fire of holy zeal ;
till at last, when the hour for action came, he launched forth upon
his brief earthly work with a swift impetuosity, like the rush of those
short-lived cataracts, yet with a firmness of unbending will and pur-
pose, like the stability of those rocky heights among which for thirty
years he had been living.
But what had those thirty years in the current of Jewish history
presented ? At their beginning those intestine wars which previously
had somewhat weakened the Roman power, had closed in the peace-
ful establishment of the empire under Augustus Caesar. The dangers
to Jewish liberty grew all the greater, and the impatience of the peo-
ple under the Roman yoke became the more intense; the extreme
patriot party, who were in favor with the people generally, became
fanatic in their zeal. After the death of Herod the Great, while yet
it remained uncertain whether Augustus would recognize the acces-
sion of Archelaus to the throne, an insurrection broke out in Jerusa-
lem, which was only quelled by the slaughter of three thousand of the
insurgents, and by the ill-omened stoppage of the great Passover fes-
tival. Augustus, unwilling to lay any heavier yoke on those who
were already fretting beneath the one they bore, confirmed the will
of Herod by which he divided his kingdom among his sons, suffered
the Jews still to have nominally a government of their own, and rec-
ognized Archelaus as king over Judea and Samaria. His reign was
a short and troubled one, and at its close Judea and Samaria were
attached to Syria, made part of a Roman province, and had procu-
rators or governors from Rome set over them, of whom the sixth in
order was Pontius Pilate, who entered upon his office about the very
time when the Baptist began his ministry. The lingering shadows
of royalty and independence were thus removed. Not content with
removing them, the usurper intermeddled with the ecclesiastical as
well as the civil government of Judea. In the Mosaic Institute, the
high priest, the most important public functionary of the Jews,
attained his office hereditarily, and held it for life. The emperor
now claimed and exercised the right of investiture, and appointed
72 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
and deposed as he pleased. During the period between the death
oi Herod and the destruction of Jerusalem, we read of twenty-eight
high priests holding the office in succession, only one of whom retain-
ed it till his death. This dependence on Home, not only for the
appointment but for continuance in it, necessarily generated great
servility on the part of aspirants to the office, and great abuses in
the manner in which its duties were discharged. A supple, saga-
cious, venal man, like Annas, though not able to establish himself
permanently in the chair, was able to secure it in turn for five of his
sons, for his son-in-law Caiaphas, with whom he was associated at
the time of the crucifixion, and afterwards for his grandson. Such a
state of things among the governing authorities fomented t-he popu-
lar animosity to the foreign rule. The whole country was in a fer-
ment. Popular outbreaks were constantly occurring. The public
mind was in such an inflammable condition that any adventurer, dar-
ing enough and strong enough to raise the standard of revolt, was
followed by multitudes. Among those insurrectionary chiefs, some
of whom were of the lowest condition and the most worthless charac-
ter, Judas of Galilee distinguished himself by his open proclamation
of the principle that it was not lawful to pay tribute to Caesar, and
his political creed was adopted by thousands who had not the cour-
age, as he had, to pay the penalty of their lives in acting it cut. It
can easily be imagined what a fresh hold their faith and hopes as to
the foretold Messiah would take upon the hearts of a people thus
galled and fretted to the uttermost by political discontent. The
higher views of his character would naturally be swallowed up and
lost in the conception of him as the great deliverer who was to break
those hated bonds which bound them, restore the old Theocracy, and
make Jerusalem, not Koine, the seat and centre of a universal mon-
archy.
Such was the state of public affairs and of the public feeling, when
a voice, loud and thrilling like the voice of a trumpet, issues from the
desert, saying, " Eepent ye, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."
Crowds come forth to listen ; they look at the strange man, true son
of the desert, from whose lips this voice cometh. He has all the
aspect, he wears the dress of one of their old prophets. They ask
about him; he is of the priestly order. Some old men begin now to
remember about his father in the temple, and the strange " sayings
that were noised abroad through all the hill country of Judea" soon
after his birth. They listen to his words; it is true he does not
directly claim divine authority; the old prophetic formula, "Thus
saith the Lord," he does not employ; he points to nc sign, he worka
THE FORERUNNER. 73
no miracle ; ho trusts to the simple power of the summons he makes,
the prophecy he utters ; yet there is something in the very manner of
his utterance so prophet-like, that a prophet they cannot help believ-
ing him to be. There is nothing particularly ingratiating in his call
to repent, but the announcement that the kingdom of heaven is at
the door, and that they must all at once arise and prepare for it,
meets the deepest, warmest wishes of their hearts. It is at hand
at last, this strange man says — the kingdom for which they have
so long been waiting; and shall they not go forth to welcome its
approach and rejoice in its triumphs? The spell of the Baptist's
preaching, in whatever it lay, was one that operated with a speed and
a power and to an extent of which we have the parallel only in times
of the greatest excitement, like those of the Crusades, or of the
Reformation. " Then went out to him," we are told, " all Judea, and
they of Jerusalem, and all the region round about Jordan, and were
baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins." It would seem as
if with one consent the entire population of the southern part of Pal-
estine had gathered around the Baptist, and for the time were pliant
in his hands. It may have facilitated their assemblage if, as has been
conjectured, it was a Sabbatic year when John began his work, and
the people, set free from their ordinary labors, were ready to follow
him, as he led them to the banks of the Jordan to be baptized.
This baptism in the river was so marked a feature in the ministry
of John, that it gave him his distinctive title, The Baptist. It was a
new and peculiar rite; of Divine appointment, as appears not only
from the question which our Lord put to the Jewish rulers, " The
baptism of John, was it from heaven, or of men?" but also from the
declaration of John himself, " He that sent me to baptize with
water." It may have been suggested by, as it was in some respects
similar to, the various ablutions or washings with water prescribed
in the Mosaic ritual ; yet from all of these baptisms, if baptisms they
could be called, it differed in many respects. They were all intended
simply as instruments of purification from ceremonial defilement ; it
had another character and object. With a few exceptional cases,
they were all performed by the person's own hands, who went through
the process of purification; it was performed by another, by the
hands of John himself, or some of his disciples. They were repeated
as often as the defilement was renewed; it was administered only
nice. There was indeed one Jewish custom which, if then in use,
presents a clear analogy to the baptism of John. When proselytes
from heathenism were admitted into the pale of the Jewish common-
wealth, after circumcision they were baptized. "They bring the
74 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
proselyte," says an old Jewish authority,* "to baptism, and being
placed in the water, they again instruct him in some weightier and
in some lighter commands of the law, which being heard, he plunges
himself and comes up, and behold he is an Israelite in all things."
It would look as if the baptism of John was borrowed from this
proselyte baptism of the Jews ; but though it were, it will at once
appear to you that the former rite had marked peculiarities of its
own. And as it stood thus distinguished from all Jewish, so also did
it stand distinguished from the Christian rite ordained by our Lord
himself, which involved a fuller faith, symbolized a higher privilege,
and was always administered in the name of Christ. The one rite
might be regarded indeed as running into and being superseded by
the other, but of the great difference between them we have proof in
the fact that those who had received the baptism of John were never-
theless re-baptized on their admission into the Christian church. f
John's baptism, like every thing about his ministry, was imperfect,
preparatory, temporary, and transient, involving simply a confession
of unworthiness, and a faith in one to come, through whom the re-
mission of sins was to be conveyed.
The people who flocked around John readily submitted to his
baptism, whether regarding it as altogether new, or the modified
form of some of then- own old observances. The accompaniment of
his teaching with the administration of such an ordinance may have
helped to reconcile the Pharisees, who were such lovers of the ritual-
istic, to a preaching which had little in itself to recommend it to them,
as the absence on the other hand of all doctrinal instruction, ah
references to the unseen world, to angels and spirits, and the resur-
rection, may have helped to conciliate the prejudices of the Saddu-
cees. At any rate, we learn that, borne along with the flowing tide,
Pharisees and Sadducees did actually present themselves before
John to claim baptism at his hands. His quick, keen, spiritual in-
sight at once detected the veiled deceit that lay in their doing so,
and in the very spirit which his great Master afterwards displayed,
ho proceeded to denounce their hypocrisy, giving them indeed the
very title which Jesus bestowed on them. John's whole ministry,
his teaching and baptizing, if it meant any thing, meant this, that
without an inward spiritual change, without penitence, without refor-
mation, no Israelite was prepared to enter into that kingdom whose
advent he announced. His preaching was the preaching of repent-
ance, his baptism the baptism of repentance ; the one great lesson
the whole involved, was that all Israel had become spiritually unfit
° Maimonides. f See Acts 19.
THE FORERUNNER. 75
for welcoming the Messiah, and sharing the blessings of his reign.
But here were some, the Pharisees and Sadducees who now stood be-
fore him, of whom he knew, that so far from entertaining the least
idea that they required to go through any such process, they regard-
ed themselves as preeminently the very ones to whom from theii
position in Israel this kingdom was at once to bring its blessings.
Penetrating their secret thoughts, the Baptist said to them, " Think
not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father," and
therefore are, simply as his descendants, entitled to all the benefits
of that kingdom which is to be set up in Judea ; " I say unto you,
that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham ;"
a dim, yet not uncertain preintimation of the spiritual character and
wide extension of the new kingdom of God ; the possibility even of
the outcast and down-trodden Gentiles being admitted into it.
John's bold and honest treatment of the Pharisees and Sadducees
only made him look the more prophet-like in the eyes of the common
people. It encouraged them to ask, "What shall we do then ?" In a
form of precept like to that which Christ frequently employed, John
said to them, " He that hath two coats, let him impart to him that
hath none. He that hath meat, let him do likewise." There is no
better sign morally of a community than when such kindly links oi
brotherly sympathy so bind together all classes, as that those who
have are ever ready to help those who want ; as, on the other hand,
there is no clearer proof of a community morally disorganized than
the absence of this benevolent disposition. Judea was at this time,
both as to its religious and political condition, thoroughly disorgan-
ized ; and in inculcating in this direct and emphatic way the great
duty of a universal charity, John was at once laying bare one of the
sorest of existing evils, and pointing to the method of its cure.
Then came to him the publicans also, those Jews who for gain's
sake had farmed the taxes imposed by the Romans ; a class odious
and despised, looked upon by their countrymen generally as traitors,
who, by extortion, drew large profits out of the national degradation.
They, too, get the answer exactly suited to them : " Exact no more
than what is appointed to you." Then came to him soldiers, Jews
we may believe who had enlisted under the Eoman standard, and
who not satisfied with the soldier's common pay abused their power
as the military police of the country, and by force, or threat of accu-
sation before the higher authorities, sought to improve their condi-
tion. They, too, got the answer suited to their case : "Do violence
to no man: neither accuse any falsely, and be content with your
wages." These are but a few stray specimens of the manner in
76 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
which the Baptist dealt with those who came to him : one quite new,
yet so much needed. What power must have been exerted over a
people so long accustomed to the inculcation of a mere ceremonial
pietism, by this thoroughly intrepid, downright, plain, practical, un-
accommodating and uncompromising kind of teaching. The great
secret of its success lay here : that unsupported by any confirming
signs from heaven — in a certain sense not needing them — he incul-
cated the duties of justice, truthfulness, forbearance, charity, by a
direct appeal to the simple, naked sense of right and wrong that
dwells in every human bosom. And the world has seldom seen a
more striking proof of the power of conscience, and of the response
which, when taken suddenly and before it has time to get warped
and biased, conscience will give to all direct, sincere, and vigorous
addresses to it, than when those multitudes from Judea and Jerusa-
lem, and all the land, gathered round the Baptist on the banks of the
Jordan.
"What an animating spectacle must these banks have then exhib-
ited; a spectacle which has ever since been annually renewed by the
resort of thousands of pilgrims thither. Our last and best describe!
of Palestine* brings it thus before our eyes : " No common spring or
tank would meet the necessities of the multitudes. The Jordan now
seemed to have met with its fit purpose. It was the one river of
Palestine sacred in its recollections, abundant in its waters ; and yet
at the same time the river not of cities but of the wilderness, the
scene of the preaching of those who dwelt not in king's palaces, nor
wore soft clothing. On the banks of the rushing stream the multi-
tudes gathered ; the priests and scribes from Jerusalem, down the
pass of Adummim ; the publicans from Jericho on the south, and the
lake of Gennesareth on the north; the soldiers on their way from
Damascus to Petra, through the Ghor, in the war with the Arab
chief Hareth; the peasants from Galilee, with One from Nazareth,
through the opening of the plain of Esdraelon. The tall reeds or
canes in the jungle waved, shaken by the wind ; the pebbles of the
bare clay hills lay around, to which the Baptist pointed as capable of
being transformed into the children of Abraham ; at their feet rushed
the refreshing stream of the never-failing river."
This description, indeed, applies to a period in the narrative a
little farther on than the one which is now immediately before us.
The "One from Nazareth" may have left his village home, and been
already on the way, but as yet he was buried in obscurity, deep
hidden among the people. All the people were musing in their
° Stanley.
THE FORERUNNER. 77
hearts whether John were not himself the Christ. He knew what
was in their hearts; he knew how ready they were to hail him as
their promised deliverer. No man of his degree has ever had a fairer
opportunity of lifting himself to high repute upon the shoulders of an
acclaiming multitude. Did the tempting thought for a moment flit
across his mind that he should seize upon the occasion so presented ?
If it did, he was in haste to expel the intruder, and prevent the mul-
titude by at once proclaiming that he was not the great prophet they
were ready to believe he was ; that another was at hand much greater
than he, to whom he was not worthy to discharge the lowest and most
menial office of a slave, the carrying of his sandal, the unloosing of
his shoe-latchet. He, John, baptized with water unto repentance, an
incomplete and altogether preparatory affair ; but the greater than he
would baptize with the Holy Ghost and with fire.
Such was the prompt and decisive manner in which he disowned
all high pretensions. And when, shortly afterwards, posterior to our
Lord's baptism, of which they may have heard nothing, a deputation
from Jerusalem came down to ask him, "Who art thou?" he met the
question with the emphatic negative, "I am not the Christ." " Art thou
Elias then?" they said. John knew that the men who put this query
to him were caring only about his person, and careless about his
office — in the true spirit of all religious formalists, wanting so much
to know who the teacher was, and but little heeding what his teach-
ing meant; he knew that their idea was that the heavens were to
give back Elijah to the earth, and that he was to appear in person
to announce and anoint the Messiah, and that many of them believed
that besides Elias another of the old prophets was to arise from the
dead, to dignify by his presence the great era of the Messiah's inau-
guration. Answering their questions according to the meaning of the
questioners when they said, "Art thou Elias?" he said, "I am not ;"
when they asked him, "Art thou that prophet?" he answered, "No."
And when still further they inquired, "Who art thou then, that we may
give an answer to them that sent us?" he said, that he was but a
voice and nothing more, "the voice of one crying in the wilderness,
Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias."
Pressing him still farther by the interrogation, why it was that he
baptized if he were neither Christ, nor Elias, nor that prophet ; he
speaks again of his own baptism as if it were too insignificant a
matter for any question about his right to administer it being raised
or answered, and of the greater than he already revealed to him
by the sign from heaven: "I baptize with water, but there stand-
eth one among you whom ye know not. He it is who coming after
78 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
me is preferred before me, whose shoe-latchet I am not worthy to
unloose. "
It is this jDrompt acknowledgment of his own infinite inferiority
to Christ, his thorough appreciation of the relative position in which
he stood to Jesus, the readiness with which he undertook the honorable
but humble task of being but his herald, the unimpeachable fidelity
and unfaltering steadiness with which he fulfilled the special course
marked out for him by God, and above all the entire and apparently
unconscious self-abnegation which in doing so he displayed, that
shine forth as the prominent features in the personal character of the
Baptist.
To these, particularly to the last, we shall have occasion hereafter
to allude. Meanwhile, let us dwell a moment on the place and office
which the ministry of John occupied midway between the old and the
new economy. "The law and the prophets were until John." In
him and with him they expired. He was a prophet, the only oue
among them all whose coming and whose office were themselves of
old the subject of prophecy, honored above them all by the nearness
of his standing to Jesus, by his being the friend of the Bridegroom,
to whom it was given to hear the Bridegroom's living voice. But he
was more than a prophet. Of the greatest of his predecessors, of
Moses, of Elijah, of Daniel, it was true that they filled but a limited
space in the great dispensation with which they were connected;
their days but a handbreath in the broad cycle of events with which
their lives and labors were wrapped up, the individuality of each, if
not lost among, yet linked with that of a multitude of compeers.
But John presents himself alone. The prophet of the desert, the
forerunner of the Lord, appears without a coadjutor, a whole distinct
economy in himself. To announce Christ's advent, to break up the
way before Him, to make ready a people prepared for the Lord, this
was the specific object of that economy which began and ended in
John's ministry.
The kind, and amount of the service which the Baptist thus ren-
dered, as well as the need of it, it is difficult for us now thoroughly
to understand and appreciate. In what respect Christ would have
been placed at a disadvantage had not John preceded him ; in what
respects the Baptist did open up the way before the Lord ; in what
respects John's ministry told upon the condition of the Jewish
people, morally and spiritually, so as to make it different from what
it otherwise would have been — so as to make the soil all the better
prepared to receive the seed which the hand of the Divine sower
scattered — it is not very easy for us to estimate. One thing is clear
THE FORERUNNER. 79
enough, that it was John's hand which struck the first bold stroke at
the root of the strong national prejudice which narrowed and carnal-
ized the expected kingdom of their Messiah. It is quite possible,
that, as to the true nature and extent of the coming kingdom, John
may have been as much in the dark as the twelve apostles were till
the day of Pentecost. One thing, however, was revealed to him in
clearest light, and it was upon his knowledge of this that he spoke
with such authority and power, that whatever the future kingdom
was to be, it should be one in which force and fraud, and selfishness
and insincerity, and all sham piety, were to be denied a place ; for
which those would stand best prepared who were readiest to confess
and give up their sins, and to act justly and benevolently towards
their fellow-men, humbly and sincerely towards their God. You
have but the rudiments, indeed, of the true doctrine of repentance in
the teaching of the Baptist — the Christian doctrine but in germ ; but
it is not difficult to see in it the same great lesson broached as to the
inner and spiritual qualifications required of all the members of the
kingdom of Christ, which was afterwards, with so much greater depth
and fulness, unfolded privately to Nicodemus at the very beginning
of our Lord's ministry in Judea, when he said to him: "Except a
man be born again, he cannot see, he cannot enter into the kingdom
of God ;" and publicly to the multitudes on the hill-side of Galilee,
when the Lord said to them:- "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for
theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
It would be quite wrong, it would indicate an ignorance of the
peculiar service which the Baptist was called upon to render, were
we to imagine that there must be a preparatory process of repentance
and reformation gone through by each of us before we believe in
Jesus, and by faith enter the kingdom. Our position is so different
from that occupied by the multitude to whom John preached, that
what was most suitable for them is not so suitable for us.
And yet not without some broad and general lessons for the
church, at all times and in all ages, was it ordered so that the gentle
preacher of peace should be preceded by the stern preacher of re*
pentance ; that John should be seen in the desert in advance of Jesus,
in his appearance, his haunts, his habits, his words, his ordinance,
proclaiming and symbolizing the duty and discipline of penitence.
It was only thus, by the ministry of the one running into the ministry
of the other, that the Christian life, in its acts of penitence, as well
as in its acts of faith and love, could stand before us in vivid relief,
embodied in a full-orbed and personal portraiture. Jesus had no sin
of hi3 own to mourn over, no evil dispositions to subdue, no evi)
80 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
habits to relinquish. In the person, character, and life of Jesus, the
great and needful duty of mortifying the body of sin and death could
receive no visible illustration. He could supply to us no model or
exemplar here. Was it not then wisely ordered that moving before,
and for a time beside him, there should be seen that severer figure of
the Baptist, as if to tell us that the proud spirit that is in us must be
bowed, and the mountain-heights of pride in us be laid low, and the
crooked things be made straight, and the rough places plain, to make
way for the coming in of the Prince of Peace, and the setting up of
his kingdom in our hearts ; that we must go with the Baptist into the
solitudes of the desert, as well as with the Saviour into the happy
homes and villages of Galilee? Would you see, in its full, finished,
and perfect form, the character and course of conduct, which, as fol-
lowers of the Crucified, we are to aim at and to realize, go study it in
the life of Jesus. But would you see it in its formation as well as in
its finish, go study it in the life of the Baptist ; put the two together,
John and Jesus, and the portraiture is complete.
VIII.
The Baptism.*
We have no definite information as to the date of the commence-
ment of John's ministry, or his own age at that time. As we know,
however, that he was six months older than Jesus, as we are told that
Jesus was about thirty years of age when he began his public minis-
try, and as that was the age fixed in the Jewish law for the priests
entering on the duties of their office, it seems reasonable to conclude
that the ministry of John had already lasted six months when Jesus
presented himself before the Baptist on the banks of the Jordan. This
would allow full time for intelligence of a movement which so rapidly
pervaded the entire population of the southern districts of the coun-
try, penetrating Galilee, and reaching even to Nazareth. Moved by
this intelligence, other Galileans of that district as well as Jesus may
have followed the wake of the multitude, and directed their sieps to
the place where John was baptizing. In these circumstances Christ's
departure from his home may not have created the surprise which it
otherwise would have done. When Mary saw her son, who had
hitherto so quietly and exclusively devoted himself to their discharge,
throw up all his household duties and depart; when she learned
o Matt. 3 : 13-17 ; Mark 1: 9-11 ; Luke 3 : 21-23 , John 1 : 30-33.
THE BAPTISM. 81
whither it was that his footsteps were tending, and gathered, as she
may have done, from the tidings which were then afloat, that it was
none other than the son of her relative Elisabeth who was shaking
the entire community of the south by his summons to repent, and his
proclamation of the nearness of the kingdom, she could scarcely
have let Jesus go, for the first time that he had ever so parted from
her, without following him with many wistful, wondering anxieties
and hopes. But she did not know that he now left that home m
Nazareth never but for a few days to return to it. Had she known
it, could she have let him go alone? It was alone, however, and
externally undistinguished among the crowd, that Jesus stood before
John, and craved baptism at his hands. Efe did this in the simplest,
least ostentatious way, aUowing the great mass of the baptisms to be
over, mingling with the people, and offering himself as one of the
last to whom the rite was to be administered. "It came to pass,"
Luke tells us, that "when all the people were baptized," Jesus was
baptized also. But his baptism did not go past as the others did.
So soon as John's eye fell upon this new candidate for the ordinance,
he saw in him one altogether different in person and character from
any who had hitherto been baptized. He felt at once as if this
administration of his baptism would be altogether out of place ; thai
for Jesus to be baptized by him would be to invert ^he relationship
in which he knew and felt that they stood to one another. By earnest
speech or expressive gesture he intimated his unwillingness to comply
with the request. The word which St. Matthew uses in telling us
that John forbade him, is one indicative of a very strenuous refusal
on his part. This refusal he accompanied with the words: "I hav©
need to be baptized of thee ; and comest thou to me !"
These wordSj you will particularly remark, were spoken at the
commencement of their interview, before the baptism of our Lord,
before that sign from heaven was given of which he had been fore-
warned, and for which he was to wait before pronouncing of any
individual that he was the greater One who was to come, who was to
baptize with the Holy Ghost and with fire. Till he saw the Spirit
descending and remaining, John could not know certainly, and had
no warrant authoritatively to say that this was He of whom he spake.
From the Baptist saying twice afterwards, " I knew him not," it has
been imagined that up to this meeting John had never seen Jesus,
had no personal acquaintance with his relative the son of Mary ; and
the distance at which they lived from one another, with the entire
length of the land between them, the retired life of the One at Naza-
reth, and the dwelling of the other in the desert, have been referred
Life ofOulrt. fi
82 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
to as explaining the absence of ail acquaintance and intercc tirse.
That there could have been but little intercourse is clear ; that thej
may nevei have seen each other till now is possible. But if so, how
are we to explain John's meeting the proposal of Jesus with so instant
and earnest a declaration, and saying to him, "I have need to be bap-
tized of thee ; and comest thou to me !" Jesus must either before
these words were spoken have told John who he was, and the Bap-
tist must have known from ordinary sources what a sinless and holy
life he had been leading for these thirty years at Nazareth, or
this knowledge must have been supematurally communicated ; for
knowledge of Jesus to this extent at least, that he was no fit subject
for a baptism which was for sinners, was obviously implied in this
address.
Is it, however, so certain, or even so probable, that John and
Jesus had never met till now ? Zacharias and Elisabeth had to instruct
their son as to his earthly work, his heavenly calling, and in doing so
must have told him of the visit of Mary and the birth of Jesus. He
must have learned from them enough to direct his eye longingly and
expectantly to his Galilean relative as no other than the Messiah, for
whose coming he was to prepare the people. True, he retired early
to the desert, which was his place of ordinary residence till, the time
of his showing unto Israel, but did that imply that he never was at
Jerusalem, never went up to the great yearly festivals? Jesus was
once, at least, in Jerusalem in his youth, and may have been often
there before his thirtieth year. So, too, may it have been with John,
and if so, they must have met there, and become acquainted with one
another. Much, however, as there may have been to lead John to
the belief that Jesus was he that was to come after him. the lapse of
those thirty years, during which the two had bee*i almost totally
separated, and the absence of all sign or token of the Messiahship
luring Christ's secluded life at Nazareth, may have led him to doubt.
Sven after he had received his great commission he might continue
.n the same state of uncertainty waiting, as he had been instructed,
till the sign from heaven was given. Whatever John's inward sur-
mises or convictions may have been, he must have felt that it became
him neither to speak of them nor to act on them, till the promised
and visible token of the Messiahship lighted on him whom he was
then to hold forth to the people as the Lamb of God, who was to
take away the sin of the world. Such we conceive to have been the
state of John's mind and feelings towards Jesus when He presented
himself before him for baptism. From previous acquaintance he may
instantly have recognised him as the son of Mary, to whom his
THE BAPTISM. 83
thoughts and hopes had for so many years been pointing. He cer-
tainly did at once recognise him as his superior, as one at least so
much holier than himself that he shrunk from baptizing Him. But
he did not certainly know him as the Christ the Son of God; did not
so know him at least as to be entitled to point him out as such to the
people. When, some weeks afterwards, he actually did so, he was
at pains to tell those whom he addressed that it was not upon the
ground of any previous personal knowledge, or individual connection,
that he spake of him as he did. "I knew him not," he said; " but
he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon
whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him,
the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw,
and bear record that this is the Son of God."
We now know more of Jesus than perhaps John did when Christ
stood before him to be baptized; we know that he was the Holy One
of God, who had no sin of his own to confess, no pollution to wash
away ; and we too, like John, may wonder that the sinless Son of God
should have submitted to such a baptism as his, a baptism accompa-
nied with the acknowledgment of sin and the profession of repentance,
and which was the symbol of the removal of the polluting stains of
guilt. But our Lord's words fall upon our ears as they did on those
of John: "Suffer it to be so now, for thus it becometu us to fulfil all
righteousness." Firmly yet gently, authoritatively yet courteously,
clothing the command in the form of a request, he carries it over the
reluctance and remonstrance of the Baptist. "Suffer it to be so
now," for this once, so long as the present transient earthly relation-
ship between us subsists. Suffer it, " for so it becometh us to fulfil
all righteousness." It is not then as a violator, but as a fulfill er of
the law that Jesus comes to be baptized; not as one who confesses
the want of such a perfect righteousness as might be presented for
acceptance to God, but as one prepared to meet every requirement
of his Father, and to render to it an exact and complete obedience.
Who could speak thus, as if it were such an easy, as well as such a
becoming thing in him to fulfil all righteousness, but the onlv begot-
ten of the Father — he who, in coming into this world, could say, " Lo,
I come to do thy will, O God."
And here in subjecting himself to the baptism of John, you have
the first instance of Christ's acting in his public official character as
the Messiah. He sieps forth at last from his long retirement, his
deep seclusion at Nazareth, to appear how ? to do what ? To appear
as an inferior before the Baptist, to ask a service at his hands, to
enroll himself as one of his disciples; for this was the primary pur-
84 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
pose of this ordinance. It was the initiatory rite by which repentant
Israelites enrolled themselves as the hopeful expectants of the coming
kingdom ; and He, the head of that kingdom, stoops to enroll himseli
in this way among them. " By one spirit," says the apostle, " we are
all baptized into one body ;" the ontward baptism the sign or symbol
of our incorporation into that one body the church. In the same way
the Lord himself enters into that body, honors the ordinance which
God had sent John to administer, conforms even to that preparatory
and temporary economy through which his infant church was called
to pass, putting himself under the law, making himself in all things
like unto his brethren.
Still, however, the difficulty returns upon us as to what meaning
such a rite as that of John's baptism could have in the case of Jesus ;
sin he had none to confess, nor penitence to feel, nor reformation to
effect, nor a faith in the One to come to cherish. Yet his baptism in
the Jordan was not without meaning; nay, its singular significance
reveals itself as we contemplate the sinlessness of his character. We
rightly regard the baptism of Jesus as the first act of his public min-
istry; and does he not present himself at the very outset in that
peculiar character and office which he sustains throughout his medi-
atorial work, identifying himself with his people as their representa-
tive and their head ; taking on him their sins, numbering himself with
transgressors — doing now, enduring afterwards what it became them
as sinners to do, as sinners to suffer ?
But let us now fix our eye on what happened immediately after
the baptism of Christ. He came up straightway out of the water.
He did not wait, as the Jews asked the proselyte to do, to listen to
still further instruction out of the law; instruction likely to be the
more deeply impressed by the time and circumstances under which
it was given. He did not wait, as we are led from the very expres-
sion employed here to believe that many of those did who received
the baptism from John. In him there was no need for such delay or
any such instruction. The law of his God, was it not written wholly,
deeply, indelibly in his heart ? Straightway, therefore, he goes forth
from under the Baptist's hands. John's wondering eye is on him as
he ascends the river banks. There he throws himself into the atti-
tude, engages in the exercise of prayer, and then it is, as with uplifted
hands he gazes into the heavens, that he sees them opened above his
head, the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him.,
and a voice from heaven saying to him, " Thou art my beloved Son,
in whom I am well pleased."
The requirements of the narrative, as given by St. Matthew, St
THE BAPTISM. 85
Mark, and St. Luke, do not involve us in the belief that the bystand-
ers generally, if present in any numbers, saw these sights and heard
that voice. Its being so distinctly specified by each of the evange-
lists that it was He who saw and heard, would rather lead us to the
inference that the sight and the hearing were confined to our Lord.
J ohn, indeed, tells us that he saw the vision, and we may believe
therefore that he also heard the voice, but beyond the two, who
may have been standing apart and by themselves, it would not seem
that the wonders of this incident were at the time revealed. Other
instances of like manifestations had this feature attached to them,
that they were revealed to those whose organs were opened and
allowed to take them in, and were hidden from those around. Ste-
phen saw the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the
right hand of God. The clamorous crowd about him did not see as
he did. Had the vision burst upon their eyes, it would have awed
their tumultuous rage to rest. When Saul was struck down on his
way to Damascus, his companions saw indeed a light and heard some
sounds, but they neither saw the person of the Saviour nor distin-
guished the words he spoke, though in one sense in a much fitter
condition to do so than Saul was. It is said of the disciples on the
day of Pentecost, that there appeared unto them tongues as of fire
which rested on the head of each; it is not likely that these were
seen by those who mocked.
But be it as it may as to the other spectators and auditors, it is
evident that these supernatural appearances gave to the baptism of
Jesus a new character in the Baptist's eyes, as they should do in
ours. In the descending dove, outward emblem of the descending
Spirit, he not only saw the preappointed token that the greater than
he, who was to baptize with the Holy Ghost, was before him, but in
the whole incident he beheld the first great step in our Lord's publie
and official life — the setting of him openly apart as the Lamb for the
sacrifice
As Jesus stepped forth after the baptism on the banks of the river,
he stood severed from the past, connected with a new future ; Naza-
reth, its quiet home, its happy days, its peaceful occupations, lay
behind ; trials and toils and suffering and death lay before him. He
would not have been the Son of man had he not felt the significance
and solemnity of the hour; he would not have been the full partaker
of our human nature had the weight of his new position, new duties,
new trials not pressed heavily upon his heart. He turns, in the pine,
true instinct of his sinless humanity to seek support and strength in
God, to throw himself and all his future upon his Father in prayer.
86 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
But who may tell us how he felt and what he prayed? what desires,
what hopes, what solicitudes went up from the heart at least, if not
from the lips, of this extraordinary suppliant! Never be-fore had the
throne of the heavenly Grace been thus approached, and never
before was such answer given. The prayer ascends direct from earth
to heaven, and brings the immediate answer down. It is as he prays
that the Spirit comes, bringing light and strength and comfort to the
Saviour, sustaining him under that consciousness of his Sonship to
God, which now fills, expands, exalts his weak humanity. And does
not our great Head and Representative stand before us here a type
and pattern of every true believer in the Lord, as to the duty, the
privilege, the power of prayer ? Of him, and of him only of the sons
of men, might it be said that he prayed without ceasing; that his life
was one of constant and sustained communion with his Father; and
yet you find him on all the great occasions of his life having recourse
to separate, solitary, sometimes to prolonged acts of devotion. His
baptism, his appointment of the twelve apostles, his escape from the
attempt to make him a king, his transfiguration, his agony in the gar-
den, his death upon the cross, were all hallowed by prayer. The first
and the last acts of his ministry were acts of prayer. From the low-
est depth, from the highest elevation of that ministry, he poured out
his spirit in prayer. For his mission on earth, for all his heaviest
trials, he prepared himself by prayer. And should we not prepare
for our poor earthly service, and fortify ourselves against temptations
and trials, by following that great example ? The heavens above are
not shut up against us, the Spirit who descended like a dove has not
taken wings and flown away for ever from this earth. There is a
power by which these heavens can still be penetrated, which can still
bring down upon us that gentle messenger of rest — the power that
lies in simple, humble, earnest, continued believing prayer.
The Holy Spirit, as he descended upon Jesus, was pleased to
assume the form and gentle motion of a dove gliding down from the
skies. He came not now as a rushing mighty wind. He sat not on
Jesus as a cloven tongue of fire. It was right that when he came to
do the work of quick and strong conviction necessary in converting
the souls of men, to bestow those gifts by which the first missiona-
ries of the cross should be qualified for prosecuting that work, the
rush as of a whirlwind should sweep through the room in which the dis-
eiples were assembled, and the cloven tongues of fire should come
down and rest upon their heads. But the visitation of the Spirit to
the Saviour was for an altogether different purpose, and it could not
be more fitly represented than by the meek-eyed dove, the chosaa
THE BAPTISM- 87
symbol of gentlenses and affection. The eagle with its wing of power,
its eye of fire, its beak of terror was the bird of Jove. The dove the
bird of Jesus. To him the Spirit came not, as in dealing with the
souls of men, to bring light out of darkness, order out of confusion,
but to point out as the Saviour of the world the meek and the lowly,
the gentle and the loving Jesus.
But was no ulterior purpose served by the descent of the Spirit
on this occasion ? "We touch a mystery here we cannot solve, and
need not try to penetrate. The sinless humanity of Jesus was brought
into intimate and everlasting union with the divine nature of the Son
of God, doubly secured as we should say from sin, and fully qualified
for all the Messianic service, and yet we are taught that that human.-
ity was impregnated and fitted for its work by the indwelling of the
Holy Spirit. He was born of the Holy Ghost. He was led by the
Spirit into the wilderness. In the synagogue of Nazareth, where he
had first opened his lips as a public teacher, there was given to him
the book of the prophet Isaiah ; he read the words, " The Spirit of the
Lord is upon me ;" and having read the passage out, he closed the
book, and said, " This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears."
John testified of him saying: "He whom God hath sent speaketh
the words of God, for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto
him." Jesus said of himself: "If I cast out devils by the Spirit of
God, then is the kingdom of God come unto you." " God anointed
Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power." It was
through the eternal Spirit that he offered himself without spot
to God. Heb. 9 : 14. He was declared to be the Son of God with
power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from
the dead. Rom. 1:4. It was through the Holy Ghost that he gave
commandments to the apostles whom he had chosen, until the day
in which he was taken up. Acts 1:2. So it is that through every
stage of his career the Spirit is with him, qualifying kim for every
work, why or how he alone could tell us who could lift that veil which
shrouds the innermost recesses of the Spirit of the incarnate Son
of God.
As the Spirit lighted upon Jesus, there came to him a voice from
heaven. This voice was twice heard again ; on the Mount of Trans-
figuration, and within the temple. It was the voice of the Father.
No man, since the fall of our first parent, had ever heard that voice
before, as no man has ever heard it since. The fall sealed the
Father's lips in silence ; all divine communications afterwards with
man were made through the Son. It was he who appeared and
spate to the patriarchs; it was he who spake from the summit of
88 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
Sinai, and was the giver of the law; but now for the first time
the Father's lips are opened, the long-kept silence is broken, that
this testimony of the Father to the Sonship of Jesus, this expression
of his entire good pleasure with him as he enters upon his ministry,
may be given. That testimony and expression of approval were
repeated afterwards in the very same words at the transfiguration;
the words indeed on that occasion were spoken not to, but of Jesus,
and addressed to the disciples; and so with a latent reference per-
haps to Moses and Elias, the Father said to them : " This is my
beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased : hear ye him." But at the
baptism St. Mark and St. Luke agree in stating that the words were
spoken not of, but directly to Christ himself. Primarily and emi-
nently it may have been for Christ's own sake that the words were
upon this occasion spoken ; and as we contemplate them in this light,
we feel that no thought can fathom their import, nor gauge what
fulness of joy and strength they may have carried into the bosom of
our Lord. But here too there is a veil which we must not try to lift.
Instead of thinking then what meaning or power this assurance of
his Sonship, and of the Father's full complacency in him, may have
had for Christ, let us take it as opening to our view the one and only
way of our adoption and acceptance by the Father, even by our being
so well pleased in all things with Christ, our having such simple, im-
plicit faith in him, that the Father looking upon us as one with him,
becomes also well pleased with us.
IX.
The Temptation.*
Satan was suffered to succeed in his temptation of our first
parents. His success may for the moment have seemed to him com-
plete, secure ; for did not the sentence run, " In the day that thou
eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die"? And did not that sentence
come from One whose steadfast truthfulness — dispute it as he might
in words with Eve — none knew better than himself? Having once
then got man to sin, he might have fancied that he had broken fci
ever the tie that bound earth to heaven, that he had armed againsi
the first inhabitants of our globe the same resistless might, and the
game unyielding justice, by which he and the partners of the first
• Matthew 4 : 1-11 ; Mark 1 : 12, 13 ; Luke 4 : 1-13.
THE TEMPTATION. 89
revolt in heaven had been driven away into their dark and ignomini-
ous prison-house. But if such a hope had place for a season in the
tempter's breast, it must surely have given way when, summoned
together with his victims into the divine presence, the Lord God
said to him: "I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and
between thy seed and her seed ; it shall bruise thy head, and thou
shalt bruise his heel." Obscure as these words may at the time have
seemed, yet must they have taught Satan to know that his empire
over this new-formed world was neither to be an undisputed nor an
undivided one. An enmity of some kind between his seed and the
woman's seed was to arise ; no mere temporary irritation and insub-
ordination on the part of his new subjects, but an enmity which
would prove fatal to himself and to his kingdom, the final advantage
in the predicted warfare being all against him ; for while he was to
bruise the heel of his enemy, that enemy was to bruise his head, to
crush his power.
It could not therefore have been with a sense of security free
from uneasy anticipations, that from the days of the first Adam down
to the birth of the second, the God of this world held his empire over
our earth. His dominion was the dominion of sin and death, and his
triumph might seem complete, none of all our race being found who
could keep himself from sin; while every one that sinned had died.
But were there no checks to the exercise of his power, nothing to
inspire him with alarm? Had not Enoch and Elijah passed away
kom the world without tasting death? And must it not have
appeared to him an inscrutable mystery that so many human spirits
escaped at death altogether from beneath his sway? There were
those prophecies, besides, delivered in Judea, of which he could not
be ignorant, getting clearer and clearer as they grew in number,
speaking of the advent of a great deliverer of the race ; there were
those Jewish ceremonies prefiguring some great evemt disastrous
to his reign ; there was the whole history and government of that
wonderful people, the seed of Israel, guided by another hand than
his, and regulated with a hostile purpose.
All this must have awakened dark forebodings within Satan's
breast ; forebodings stirred into a heightened terror when one of the
woman's seed at last appeared, who, for thirty years, with perfect
ease, apparently without a struggle, resisted all the seductions by
* r hich his brethren of mankind had been led into sin. The visit of
Gabriel to Nazareth, the angelic salutations, the angels that appealed
and the hymns that floated over the hills of Bethlehem, the adora-
tion of the shepherds, the worship of the wise men, the prophecies
90 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
of the temple — all these, let us believe, were known to the great adver-
sary of our race ; but not one nor all of them together excited in him
such wonder or alarm as this simple fact, that here at last was one
who stood absolutely stainless in the midst of the world's manifold
pollutions. So long, however, as Jesus lived quietly and obscurely
it Nazareth he might be permitted to enjoy his solitary triumph
undisturbed, but his baptism in the Jordan brings him out from his
retreat. This voice from heaven, a voice that neither man nor devil
had ever heard before, resounding through the opened skies, pro-
claims Him to be more than a son of man — to be, in very deed, the
Son of God. Who can this mysterious being be ? — an alien and an
enemy, Satan has counted him from his youth. But his Sonship to
God. What can that imply ; how is it to be manifested ? The time
has come for putting him to extreme trial, and, if he may not be per-
sonally overcome, for forcing him to disclose his character at the
commencement of his career.
The opportunity for making the attempt is given. " Then was
Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the
devil." It was not, we may believe, under any thing like compulsion,
outward or inward, that Jesus acted when immediately after his
baptism he retired to the desert. Between the promptings of the
Spirit of God and the movements of Christ there ever must have
been the most entire consent and harmony. Why, then, so instantly
after his public inauguration to his earthly work, is there this volun-
tary retirement of our Lord, this hiding of himself in lonely solitudes?
Accepting here the statement of the Evangelist, that it was to furnish
the prince of darkness with the fit opportunity of assaulting him,
may we not believe that these forty days in the wilderness without
food served some other ends besides — did for our Lord in his higher
vocation what the forty days of fasting did for Moses and Elijah in
their lesser prophetic office; that they were days of preparation,
meditation, prayer — a brief season interposed between the peaceful
private life of Nazareth, and the public troubled life on which he was
about to enter, for the purpose of girding him up for the great task
assigned to him — a season of such close, absorbing, elevating, spirit-
ual exercises that the spirit triumphed over the body, and for a time
felt not even the need of daily food? It was not till these forty days
were over that he was a hungered, nor was it till hunger was felt
that the tempter came in person to assault. The expressions used
indeed by St. Mark and St. Luke appear to imply that the tempta-
tion ran through all the forty days ; but if so, it must, in the first
instance, h#ve been of an inward and purely spiritual character, such
'Days of Preparation, Meditation, Prayer."
THE TEMPTATION. 91
as we can well conceive mingling with and shadowing those other
exercises to which the days and nights of that long solitude md fast-
ing were devoted.
And yet, though the holy spirit of our Lord prompted him to fol-
low with willing footstep the leadings of the Holy Ghost, his tnu
humanity may well have shrunk from what awaited him in the desert
He knew that he was there to come into close contact with, to meet
in personal encounter the head of that kingdom he was commissioned
to overthrow; and, even as in the garden human weakness sank
tremblingly under the burden of immeasurable woe, so here it may
have shrunk from such an interview and such a conflict, needing as
it were to be urged by Divine compulsion, and thus authorizing the
strong expression which St. Mark employs, "Immediately the Spirit
driveth him into the wilderness." It may in fact have been no small
part of that trial which ran through the forty days, that he had con-
tinually before him the approach and the encounter with the prince
of darkness.
"Whatever that state of his spirit was which rendered him insensi-
ble to the cravings of hunger, it terminates with the close of the forty
days. The inward supports that had borne him up during that rapt
ecstatic condition are removed. He sinks back into a natural condi-
tion. The common bodily sensations begin to be experienced; a
strong craving for food is felt. Now, then, is the moment for the
tempter to make his first assault upon the Holy One, as weak, fam-
ished, the hunger of his long fast gnawing at his heart, he wanders
with the wild beasts as his sole companions over the frightful soli-
tudes. Coming upon him abruptly, he says to Jesus, "If thou be the
Son of God, command that these stones be made bread." The words
of the recent baptismal scene at the Jordan are yet ringing in Satan's
ears. He knows not what to make of them. He would fain believe
them false ; or better still, he would fain prove them false by prevail-
ing upon Christ himself to doubt their truth. For, for him to doubt
his Father's word would be virtually to renounce, disprove his Son-
ship. Even then, as by his artful insidious speech to the woman in
the garden — "Yea, has God said, In the day thou eatest thou ahalt
die ?" — he sought to insinuate a secret doubt of the divine truthful-
ness and divine goodness, so here, into the bosom of Jesus in the
wilderness, he seeks to infuse a kindred doubt.
'If thou be really the Son of God, as I have so lately heard thee
called— but canst thou be? can it be here, and thus, alone in these
desert places, foodless, companionless, comfortless, for so many days,
that God would leave or trust his Son? But if thou wilt not doubt
92 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
that tliou art his Son, surely God could never mean or wish that his
Son should continue in such a state as this ? If thou be truly what
thou hast been called, then all power must be thine; whatsoever
tJ lings the Father doeth, thou too must be able to do. Show, then,
thy Sonship, exert thy power, relieve thyself from this pressing
hunger; " command that these stones be made bread." ' The temp-
tation is here twofold : to shake if possible Christ's confidence in Him
who had brought him into such a condition of extreme need, and to
induce him, under the influence of that distrust, to exert at once his
own power to deliver himself, to work a miracle to provide himself
with food. The temptation is at once repelled, not by any assertion
of his Sonship, or of his abiding trust in God, in opposition to the
insidious doubt suggested — for that doubt the Saviour never cherish-
ed ; the shaft that carried this doubt in it, though artfully contrived
and skilfully directed, glanced innocuous from the mind of that con-
fiding Son, who was ever so well pleased with the Father, as the
Father had declared himself to be with him.
Nor was the temptation repelled by any such counter argument
as that it was inadmissible to exert his Divine power merely for his
own benefit; but by a simple quotation from the book of Deuteron-
omy: "It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every
word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God." Jesus waives thus
all question about his being the Son of God, or how it behooved him in
that character to act. He takes his place as a son of man, and lays his
hand upon an incident in the history of the children of Israel, who,
led out into the wilderness, and continuing as destitute of common
food forty years as he had been for forty days, received in due time
the manna provided for them by God, who said to them afterwards,
by the lips of Moses : " The Lord thy God humbled thee, and suffered
thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, that he might make thee
know that man doth not live by bread alone, but by every word that
proceedeth out of the mouth of God." It was by the word of the
Lord's creative power that for those hungry Israelites the manna was
provided; that word went forth at the Lord's own time, and to meet
his people's wants in the Lord's own way; and upon that word, that
is, upon Him whose word it was, Jesus, when now like the Israelites
a hungered in the wilderness, will rely. It is not necessary for him
to turn stones into bread in order to sustain his life ; other kinds of
food his Father, if he so pleased, could provide, and he will leave him
to do as he pleases. From that entire dependence on his Father, to
which in his present circumstances, and under that Father's guid-
ance, he had been shut up, he had no desire to be relieved— would
THE TEMPTATION. 93
certainly do nothing prematurely to relieve himself, and least of all
at Satan's bidding would use the higher, the divine faculty that was
in him, as a mere instrument of self-gratification. It was in the same
spirit of self-denial, that ever afterwards he acted. Those who taunt-
ed him on the cross, by saying, " If thou be the Son of God, come
down from the cross," knew not how exact an echo their speech at
Calvary was of Satan's speech in the wilderness — how thoroughly
they were proving their parentage, as being of their father the devil.
But Jesus would do neither as Satan nor these his children bade him.
His power divine was given him to execute the great office of our
spiritual deliverer : his way to the execution of his office lay through
trial, suffering and death, and he would not call that power in to save
him from any part of the required endurance; neither from the hun-
ger of the wilderness, nor from any of the far heavier loads he had
afterwards to bear.
Foiled in his first attempt, accepting but profiting by his defeat,
the artful adversary at once reverses his method, and assaults the
Saviour precisely on the other side. He has tried to shake Christ's
trust in his Father; he has failed; that trust seems only to gather
strength the more severely it is proved; he will work now upon
that very trust, and try to press it into presumption. "Then the
devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle
of the temple, and saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast
thyself down." ' I acknowledge that you have been right in the wil-
derness, that you have acted as a true Son of the Father. You have
given, in fact, no mean proof of your entire confidence in him as your
Father, in standing there in the extremity of hunger, and virtually
saying, 'I am here by the will of God, here he can and he will pro-
vide, I leave all to him.' But come, I ask you now to make another
and still more striking display of your dependence in all possible
conjunctures on the Divine aid. Show me, and all those worship-
pers in the court below, how far this faith of yours in your Father
will carry you. Do now, what in the sight of all will prove you to be
the very one the Jews are looking for. If thou be the Son of God,
then, as we shall presume thou art, cast thyself down ; the God who
sustained thy body without food in the wilderness, can surely sustain
it as you fling yourself into the yielding air; the people who are long-
ing to see some wonder done by their expected Messiah, will hail
you as such at once, when they see you, instead of being dashed to
pieces, floating down at their feet as gently as a dove, and alighting
in the midst of them. Give to me and them this proof of the great-
ness of your faith, the reality of your Sonship to God ; and if you
94 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
want a warrant for the act in those Scriptures which you have already
quoted, remember what is written in one of those ancient Psalms, a
psalm that the wise men say relates to you: "He shall give his angels
charge concerning thee, and in their hands shall they bear thee up,
lost at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone:" '
As promptly as before the Lord replies: "It is written again,
Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." Here again, there is no
attempt at argument, no correction of the quotation w r hich the temp-
ter had made, no reminding him that, in quoting, he had omitted one
essential clause, "He shall keep thee in all thy ways," the ways of
his appointment, not of thine own fashioning. The one Scripture is
simply met by the other, and left to be interpreted thereby. " Thou
shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." To trust was one thing, to
tempt another. Jesus would rely to the very uttermost upon the
Divine faithfulness, upon God's promised care and help ; but he
would not put that faithfulness to a needless trial. If put by the
devil in a position of difficulty and danger, he will cherish an un-
bounded trust in God, and if extrication from that position be desir-
able, and no other way of effecting it be left, he will even believe that
God will miraculously interpose in his behalf. But he will not of his
own accord, without any proper call or invitation, for no other pur-
pose than to make an experiment of the Father's willingness to aid
him, to make a show of the kind of heavenly protection he could
claim ; he will not voluntarily place himself in such a position. He
was here on the pinnacle of the temple, from that pinnacle there was
another open, easy, safe method of descent ; why should he refuse to
take it if he desired to descend; why fling himself into open space?
If he did so unasked, unordered by God himself, what warrant could
he have that the Divine power would be put forth to bear him up?
God had indeed promised to bear him up, but he had not bidden him
cast himself down, for no other purpose than to see whether he would
be borne up or no ; to do what Satan wished him to do, would be to
show not the strength of his faith, but the extent of his presumption.
Thus once again by that sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of
God, is the second thrust of the adversary turned aside.
These first two temptations, while opposite in character, have yet
much that is common to both. The preface to each of them is the
same: "If thou be the Son of God," a preface obviously suggested
by the recent testimony at the baptism. They have also the common
object of probing to the bottom, and thus trying to ascertain, the
powers and privileges which this Sonship to God conferred. There
was curiosity as well as malice in the double effort to do so, and the
THE T.EMPTATION. 95
subtlety of their method lay in this, that they were so constructed that
had Christ yielded to either, in the very disclosure of his Godhead
there had been an abuse of its power. Had Jesus taken the devil's
way of proving his strength, he would have taken the very way to
have broken it. In those first two temptations, Satan had spoken
nothing of himself, had revealed nothing of his purposes : but balked
in them he now drops the mask, appears in his own person, and bold-
ly claims homage from Christ : "Again, the devil taketh him up into an
exceeding high mountain, and showeth him all the kingdoms of the
world, and the glory of them ; and saith unto him, All these things will
I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me." Had it been upon
the actual summit of the temple at Jerusalem that Jesus previously
had been placed, and if so, how was his conveyance thither effected?
was it upon the actual summit of some earthly mountain that the feet
of our Saviour were now planted, and if so, how was it, how could it be
that all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them were brought
before his eye? We have no answer to give to these questions; we
care not to speculate as to the outward mode in which each tempta-
tion is managed. "We are willing to believe any thing as to the acces-
sories of this narrative which leaves untouched its truthfulness as an
historic record of an actual and personal encounter between the
prince of darkness and the Prince of Light. That the gospel narra-
tive is such a record, we undoubtingly believe, and are strengthened in
our faith as we perceive not only the suitableness and the subtlety of
each individual temptation, as addressed to the humanity of our
Lord, assaulting it in the only quarters in which it lay open to as-
sault ; but the comprehensiveness of the whole temptation, as exem-
plifying those classes of temptations by which humanity at large, by
which each of us, individually, is seduced from the path of true obe-
dience unto God. The body, soul, and spirit of our Lord were each
in turn invaded ; by the lust of the flesh, by the lust of the eyes, by
the pride of life, it was attempted to draw him away from his alle-
giance. The first temptation was built upon bodily appetite, the
hunger of the long fast ; the second, upon the love of ostentation, the
desire we all have to show to the uttermost in what favor we stand
with God or men; the third, upon ambition, the love of earthly, out-
ward power and glory.
The third had, however, a special adaptation to Christ's personal
character and position at the time, and this very adaptation lent to it
peculiar strength, making it, as it was the last, so also the most
insidious, the most alluring of the three. Jesus knew the ancient
prophecies about a universal monarchy that was to be set up in the
96 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
days of Messiah the prince. From the days of his childhood, when
in the temple he had sat among the doctors, hearing them and asking
them questions, the sacred volume which contained these prophecies
had been in his hands. Who shall tell us with what interest, with
what wonder, with what self- application these prophecies were pon-
dered by him in the days of his youth, during which he grew in wis
dom as he grew in years? Who shall tell us how soon or how fully
he attained the sublime consciousness, that he was himself the Mes-
siah of whom that volume spake? Whatever may have been his ear-
lier experience, at the time at least when the attestation at his bap-
tism was given, that consciousness filled and pervaded his spirit. But
he fell not into the general delusion which, in its desire for a conquer-
ing and victorious prince, lost sight of a suffering, dying Redeemer.
He knew full well that the path marked out for him as the Saviour of
mankind lay through profoundest sorrow, and would end in an ago-
nizing death. How much of all this Satan knew, it would be pre-
sumptuous to conjecture. This, however, we are assured that he
knew — for he had heard and could quote the ancient prophecies
which pointed to it — he knew about a monarchy that in the last days
the God of heaven was to set up, which was to overturn his own,
which was to embrace all the kingdoms of the world, and into which
all the glory of these kingdoms was to be brought. And he may, we
might almost say he must, have known beforehand of the toil and
strife and hard endurance through which the throne of that mon-
archy was to be reached by his great rival.
And now that rival is before him, just entering upon his career.
Upon that rival he will make a bold attempt. He will show him all
these kingdoms that have been so long under his dominion as the
god of this world. He will offer them all to him at once, without a
single blow being struck, a single peril encountered, a single suffering
endured. He will save him all that conflict which, if not doubtful in
the issue, was to be so painful in its progress. He will lay down his
sceptre, and suffer Jesus to take it up. In one great gift he will
make over his whole right of empire over these kingdoms of the world
to Christ, suffer him at once to enter upon possession of them, and
clothe himseK with all their glory. This is his glittering bribe, and
all he asks in return is that Jesus shall do him homage, as the supe-
rior by whom the splendid fief was given, and under whom it is held.
A bold and blasphemous attempt, for who gave kiin those king-
doms thus to give away ? And how could he imagine that Jesus was
open to a bribe, or would ever bow the knee to him ? Let us remem-
ber, however, that we all judge others by ourselves ; that there are
THE TEMPTATION. 97
fcliose who think that every man has his price ; that, make the bribe
but large enough, and any man may be bought. And at the head of
such thinkers is Satan. He judged Jesus by himself. And even as
through lust of government he, archangel though he was, had not
hesitated to withdraw his worship from the Supreme, so may he have
thought that, taken unawares, even the Son of God himself might
have fallen before the dazzling temptation. Had he done ^o, Satan
would indeed have triumphed ; for putting wholly out of the question
fche violated relationship to the Father, Jesus would thus have re-
nounced all the purely moral and religious purposes of his mission —
would have ceased to be regarded as the author of a spiritual revolu-
tion, and the founder of a spiritual kingdom, affecting myriads of
human spirits from the begiuning to the end of time, and would
thenceforth have taken up the character of a mere vulgar earthlv
monarch.
But Satan knew not with whom he had to do. The eye of Jes b
may for a moment have been dazzled by the offer made, and this
implied neither imperfection nor sin, but it refused to rest upon the
seducing spectacle. It turned quickly and resolutely away. No
sooner is the bribe offered than it is repelled. In haste, as if that
magnificent panorama was not one on which even his pure eye should
be suffered to repose ; as if this temptation were one which even he
could not afford to dally with; in anger too at the base condition
coupled with the bribe, and as if he who offered it could no longer be
suffered to remain in his presence, he calls the devil by his name, and
says : " Get thee hence, Satan ; for it is written, Thou shalt worship
the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve." Satan had want-
ed Jesus to give him some proof of his divine power, and now he
gets it; gets it as that command is given which he must instantly
obey. At once all that glittering illusion that he had conjured up
vanishes from the view. At once his hateful presence is withdrawn,
the conflict is over, the victory is complete. Jesus stands once more
alone in the wilderness, but he is not left alone. Angels come and
minister unto him, gazing with wonder on that mysterious man who
has entered into this solitary conflict with the head of the principali-
ties and powers of darkness, and foiled him at every point.
But how are we to look upon this mysterious passage in the life
of Christ ? Are we to read the record of it as we would the story of
a duel between two great chiefs, under neither of whom we shall ever
have to serve, in the mode and tactics of whose warfare we have con-
sequently but little interest ? The very reverse. He who appeared
that day in the wilderness before Jesus, and by so many wily acta
Ufe of Christ. 7
98 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
strove to rob him of his integrity as a Son of the Father, goeth about
still as the arch-enemy of our souls, seeking whom he may devour.
His power over us is not weakened, though it failed on Christ. His
malice against us is not lessened, though it was impotent when tried
on him. The time, the person, the circumstances all bestowed an
undoubted peculiarity upon these temptations of the wilderness, the
temple, and the mountain-top. We may be very sure that by temp-
tations the same in outward form no other human being shall ever be
assailed. But setting aside all that was special in them, let us lay
our hand on the radical and essential principle of each of these three
temptations, that we may see whether each of us is not still person-
ally exposed to it.
In the first instance, Christ, when under the pressure of one oi
the most urgent appetites of our nature, is tempted co use a powei
that he got for other purposes, to minister to his own gratification
He is tempted, in fact, to use unlawful means to procure food. Is
that a rare temptation? Not to speak here of those poor unfortu-
nates who, under a like pressure, are tempted to put forth then
hands to what is not their own, what shall we say of the merchant
whom, in the brightest season of his prosperity, some sore and unex-
pected calamity overtakes ? Through some reckless speculation, he
sees the gay vision of his hopes give way, and utter ruin stand before
him but a few days off. The dismal picture of a family accustomed
to wealth plunged into poverty already haunts his eye and rends his
heart. But a short respite still is given. Those around him are
ignorant how he stands, his credit still is good, confidence in him is
still unbroken. He can use that credit, he can employ the facilities
which that confidence still gives. He dishonorably does so; with
stealthy hand he places a portion of his fortune beyond the reach of
his future creditors to keep it for his family's use. That man meets
and falls under the very same temptation with which our Lord and
Master was assailed. Distrusting God, he uses the powers and
opportunities given him, unrighteously and for selfish ends. He for-
gets that man liveth not by bread alone, but by every word which
proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
Or what again shall we say of him who, fairly committed to the
faith of Christ, and embarked in the great effort of overcoming all
that is evil in his evil nature, plunges, with scarce a thought, into
scenes and amid temptations such that it would need a miracle to
bring him forth unscathed ? That man meets and falls under the
very same temptation with which our Saviour was assailed, when the
devil said, " Cast thyself down," and quoted the promise of Divine
THE TEMPTATION. 99
support. Many and most precious indeed are the promises of Divine
protection and support given us in the word of God, but they are not
for us to rest on if recklessly and needlessly we rush into danger,
crossing any of the common laws of nature, or trampling the dictates
of ordinary prudence and the lesson of universal experience beneath
our feet. It is not faith, it is presumption which does so.
It might seem that we could find no actual parallel to the last
temptation of our Lord, but in truth it is the one of all the three that
is most frequently presented. Thrones and kingdoms, and all their
glory, are not held out to us, but the wealth and the distinctions, the
honors and the pleasures of life — these in different forms, in different
degrees ply with their solicitations all of us in every rank, from tl e
highest to the lowest, tempting us away from God to worship an I
serve the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever-
more. A spectacle not so wide, less gorgeous in its coloring, but a i
sensuous, as illusive as that presented to Jesus on the mountain top ,
the arch-deceiver spreads out before our eyes, whispering to our
hearts, "All this will I give you;" all this money, all that ease, all
that pleasure, all that rank, all that power; but in saying so he deals
with us more treacherously than he dealt with Christ of old. With
him he boldly and broadly laid it down as the condition of the grant,
that Christ rhould fall down and worship him. He asks from us no
bending of the knee, no act of outward worship ; all he asks is, that
we believe his false promises, and turn away from God and Christ to
give ourselves up to worldliness of heart and habit and pursuit. If
we do so, he is indifferent how we now think or act toward himself
personally, for this is one of the worst peculiarities of that kingdom
of darkness over which he presides, that its ruler knows no bettei
subjects than those who deny his very being and disown his rule.
But if it be to the very same temptations as those which beset
our divine Lord and Master, that we are still exposed, let us be grate-
ful to him for teaching us how to overcome them. He used through-
out a single weapon. He had the whole armory of heaven at his
command; but he chose only one instrument of defence, the word,
the written word, that sword of the Spirit. It w T as it that he so suc-
cessfully employed. Why this exclusive use of an old weapon? He
did not need to have recourse to it. A word of his own spoken would
have had as much power as a written one quoted ; but then the les-
son of his example had been lost to us — the evidence that he himself
has left behind of the power over temptation that lies in the written
word. Knowing, then, that you wrestle not with flesh and blood
alone, but with angels, and principalities, and pow r ers, and with him
100 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the head of all, of whose devices it becomes you not to be ignorant,
take unto you the whole armor of God, for all is needed; but remem-
ber, of all the pieces of which that panoply is composed, the last that
is put into the hand of the Christian soldier by the great Captain oi
his salvation — put into his hand as the one that He himself, on the
great occasion of his conflict with the devil, used — put into his hand
as the most effective and the only one that serves at once for defence
and for assault — is the sword of the Spirit, the word of God. By it
all other parts of the armor are guarded. The helmet might be shat-
tered on the brow, the shield wrenched from the arm, did it not pro-
tect ; for hope and faith, that helmet and that shield, on what do they
rest, but upon the word of the living God ? When the tempter comes
then, and plies you with his manifold and strong solicitations, be
ready to meet him, as Jesus met him in the wilderness, and you shall
thus come to know how true is that saying of David : " By the words
of thy lips I have kept me from the path of the destroyer."
OUTLINE STUDIES. 100a
OUTLINE STUDIES.
The quiet assurance and absence of self-assertion with which
Jesus enters upon his public work, joined with his wonderful exhibition
of power and authority when occasion requires, are the points to be
emphasized in this lesson.
The first feature is seen in the way in which Jesus, after his tempta-
tion, comes and mingles with the people where John is baptizing,
making no outward effort to attract disciples, but moving calmly and
naturally till John's testimony causes the first followers to come to
him. In the same simple, homelike way he attends the marriage at
Cana, as free from any high claims for himself as any of the other
guests.
The other feature is seen in his manifesting of his divine power
and glory in changing the water into wine, his royal bounty made the
more evident by the abundance of the supply, and again when by the
majesty of his presence and action he drives the traders from the
temple.
In Christ's answer to his mother at the marriage at Cana, " Mine
hour is not yet come," there is given one of the early disclosures of a
feature that runs through all his ministry, until, near the close he
exclaims, " Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son." Dr. Hanna
says: " The perfect unbroken unity of design and action running
throughout the whole proclaims a previous foresight, a premeditated,
well-ordered plan " (p. 114).
PART I. PREPARATION AND EARLY MINISTRY.
Study 3. First Disciples and Manifested Power.
(1) John bears witness to Jesus 1006-104
a. Jesus returns to the scene of John's baptism 1006
b. The Spirit has now identified Jesus to John 101
c. John states that his Master stands among them 101
d. He says, "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the
sin of the world," and bears record that Christ is "the
Son of God " 101-104
e. The next day he again says, "Behold the Lamb of God".. . . 104
(2) Five men are attracted to Jesus, some being John's disciples.. . 104-110
a. The first two are Andrew and John the Apostle 104-106
b. Andrew next brings Peter 106
c. Philip is won on the way to Galilee 106
1006 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
d. Philip brings Nathanael 107, 108
e. Meaning of this opening work. ..,..-. 108-110
(3) Christ's first miracle 110-121
a. Marriage at Cana 110
b. Perhaps in a family related to Jesus Ill
c. The suggestion of Mary as to lack of wine 112, 113
d. The reply of Jesus showing he must now be independent in
action 113-117
e. His first miracle of changing water into wine 117
/. Its relations and teachings 118-121
(4) Christ cleansing the temple 121-129
a. Effect of the miracle at Cana 121
b. Removal of Jesus and his family to Capernaum 121-123
c. First Passover of Christ's ministry 123, 124
d. He attends it at Jerusalem 123, 124
e. He cleanses the temple 124-126
/. Significance and spiritual lessons 126-129
x.
The First Disciples.*
From the forty days in the desert, from the long fast, from the
triple assault, from the great victory won, from the companionship of
the ministering angels, Jesus returns to the banks of the Jordan, and
mingles, unnoticed and unknown, among the disciples of the Baptist.
On the day of his return, a deputation from the Sanhedrim in Jeru-
salem arrives, to institute a formal and authoritative inquiry into the
character and claims of the great preacher of repentance. John's
answers to the questions put by these deputies are chiefly negative
in their character. He is not the Christ; he is not Elijah risen from
the dead; neither is he that prophet by whom, as they imagined,
Elijah was to be accompanied; who he is he would not say, however
pointedly interrogated. But what he is, he so far informs them as
to quote and apply to himself the passage from the prophecies of
Isaiah, which spake of a voice crying in the wilderness, "Prepare ye
the way of the Lord, make his paths straight." Challenged as to his
right to baptize, if he is not that Christ, nor Elias, nor that prophet,
John can now speak as he had not been able to do previously. Hith-
erto he had spoken indeterminately of one whom he knew not, the
greater than he, who was to come after him; but now the sign from
• John 1 : 28-^51.
THE FIRST DISCIPLES. 10]
heaven had been given, the Spirit had been seen descending and abi-
ding on Jesus. From the clay of his baptism Jesus had withdrawn
John knew not whither, but now he sees him in the crowd, and says:
" I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye
know not; he it is, who, coming after me, is preferred before me,
whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose."
Having got so little to satisfy them as to who the Baptist was, it
does not seem that the deputies from Jerusalem troubled themselves
to make any inquiries as to who this other and greater than John
was. Nor was it otherwise with the multitude. Though the words
of the Baptist, so publicly spoken, were such as might well awaken
curiosity, the day passed, and Jesus remained unknown, assuming,
saying, doing nothing by which he could be recognized. That John
needed to point him out in order to recognition confirms our belief,
derived in the first instance directly from the narrative itself, that at
me baptism none but John and Jesus heard the voice from heaven, or
saw the descending dove. Had the bystanders seen and heard these,
among the disciples of John there would have been some ready at
once to recognize Jesus on his return from the desert. But it is not so.
Jesus remains hidden, and will not with his own hand lift the veil —
will not bear any witness of himself — leaves it to another to do so.
But he must not continue thus unknown — that were to frustrate
the very end of all John's ministry. The next day, therefore, as John
sees Jesus coming to him, while yet he is some way off, he points to
him, and says: "Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the
sin of the world ! This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man
which is preferred before me ; for he was before me. And I knew him
not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I
come baptizing with water I saw the Spirit descending from
heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not ■
but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me
Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on
him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I
saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God."
John's first public official testimony to Christ was, as it seems to
me, particularly remarkable, as containing no reference whatever to
that character or office in which the mass of the Jewish people might
have been willing enough to recognize him, but confined to those two
attributes of his person and work which they so resolutely rejected.
There is no mention here of Jesus as Messiah, the Prince, the King
of Israel. The record that John bears of him is, that he is the Son
of God, the Lamb of God. He had lately heard the voice from
102 THE LIFE OF CHEIST
heaven saying : " Thou art my beloved Son, in whom I am well
pleased." In giving him then this title, in calling him the Son of
God, John was but reechoing, as it were, the testimony of the Father.
Taught thus to use and to apply it, it may be fairly questioned wheth-
er the Baptist in his first employment of it entered into the full sig-
nificance of the term, as declarative of Christ's unity of nature with
the Father. That in its highest, its only true sense indeed, it did
carry with it such a meaning, and was understood to do so by those
who knew best how to interpret it, appears in many a striking pas-
sage of the life of Jesus, and most conspicuously of all, in his trial
and condemnation before the Jewish Sanhedrim. It was a title whose
assumption by Jesus involved, in the apprehension of those who
regarded him but as a man, nothing short of blasphemy. Such is
the title here given to him by the Baptist. Whether he fully under-
stood it or not, we can trace its adoption and employment to an
obvious and natural source.
But that other title, the Lamb of God, and the description annexed
ty it, " which taketh away the sin of the world," how came the Baptist
to apply these to Christ, and what did he mean by doing so ? Here
we cannot doubt that the same inner and divine teaching which
taught him in a passage of Isaiah's prophecies to see himself, taught
him in another to see the Saviour, and that it was from that passage
in which the prophet speaks of the Messiah as the Lamb brought to
the slaughter, as a sheep dumb before his shearers, that he bor-
rowed the title now for the first time bestowed upon Jesus. From
the same passage too he learned that the Anointed of the Lord was
to be " wounded for our transgressions, to be bruised for our iniqui-
ties, the chastisement of our peace was to be upon him, and with
his stripes we are to be healed." Here in Jesus John sees the
greater than himself whose way he was to prepare before him, but
that way he sees to be one leading him to suffering and to death ;
his perhaps the only Jewish eye at that moment opened to discern
the truth that it was through this suffering and this death that the
spiritual victories of the great King were to be achieved ; that it was
upon them that his spiritual kingdom was to have its broad and deep
foundations laid. John's baptism had hitherto been one of repent-
ance for the remission of sins. This remission had been held out in
prospect as the end to which repentance was to conduct; but all
about its source, its fulness, its certainty had been obscure — obscuro
perhaps to John's own eyes ; obscure at least in the manner of his
speaking about it; but now he sees the Lamb of God, the suffering,
dying Jesus, taking away by bearing it the sin of the world — not
THE FIRST DISCIPLES W
taking away by subduing it the sinfulness of the world; that John
could not have meant, and Jesus has not done — but taking the world's
sin away by taking it on himself, and expiring beneath its load,
making the great atoning sacrifice, fulfilling all the types of the Jew-
ish ceremonial, all that the paschal lamb, all that the lamb of the
morning and evening sacrifice had been typifying.
In the two declarations then of John, " This is the Son of God,'*
" Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world,"
you have in a form as distinct, as short and compendious, as it is any-
where else to be found — the gospel of the kingdom. The divine
nature of the man Christ Jesus, the completeness and efficacy of the
shedding of his blood, of the offering up of himself for the remission
of sins, are they not here very simply and plainly set forth ? We are
not asked to believe that the Baptist himself understood his own tes-
timony to Christ, as with the light thrown upon it by the epistles,
and especially in this instance, by the epistle to the Hebrews, we
now understand it; but assuredly he understood so much of it as
that he himself saw in Christ, and desired that others should see in
him, the heaven-laid channel, opened up through his life and death,
of that Divine mercy which covereth all the transgressions of every
penitent believing soul.
How interesting to hear this gospel of the grace of God preached
30 early, so simply, so earnestly, so believingly by him whose office
in all the earlier parts of his ministry was so purely moral, a call
simply to repentance, to acts and deeds of justice, mercy, truth. But
this was the issue to which all those preparatory instructions were to
conduct. The law in the hands of John was to be a schoolmaster to
guide at last to Christ; and when the time for that guidance came,
was it not with a sensation of relief, a bounding throb of exulting
satisfaction, that — conscious of how impotent in themselves all his
efforts were to get men to repent and reform, while the pardon of
their sins was anxiously toiled after in the midst of perplexity and
doubt, instead of being gratefully and joyfully accepted as God's free
gift in Christ — the Baptist proclaimed to all around, " Behold the
Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. '
Nor was he discouraged that his announcement met with no
response that day from the crowd around; that still his voice was as
the voice of one crying in the wilderness. The many who waited on
his ministry and partook of his baptism came from curiosity, acted
on a passing impulse, hoped that some new and better stfiie of things
socially and politically was to be ushered in by this strange child of
the desert — and had no deeper wants to be supplied or spiritual
104 THE LIFE OF CHRIST
iotigings to be satisfied. Quite strange — if not unmeaning, yet unwel-
come—to their ears, this new utterance of the Baptist. It was not
after the Lamb of God, not after one who was to take away theii
sins, that they were seeking. But there were others of a different
mould, partakers of the spirit of Simeon and Anna, waiting for the
consolation of Israel, for the coming of one to whom, whatever out-
ward kingdom he was to set up, they mainly looked as their spiritual
Lord and King, in the days of whose kingdom peace was to' enter
troubled consciences, and there should be rest for wearied hearts.
The eyes of these waiters for the morning saw the first streaks of
dawn in the ministry of the Baptist, and some of them had already
enrolled themselves as his disciples, attaching themselves perma-
nently to his person.
The next day after he had given his first testimony to Christ's
iamblike and sacrificial character and office — a testimony apparently
so little heeded, attended at least with no outward and visible result —
John is standing with two of these disciples by his side. He will
repeat to them the testimony of yesterday ; they had heard it already,
but he will try whether it will not have another and more powerful
effect when given not promiscuously to a general audience, but spe-
cifically to these two. Looking upon Jesus as he walked, he directed
their attention to him by simply saying once again, "Behold the
Lamb of God !" — leaving it to then memory to supply all about hhn
which in the course of the two preceding days he had declared. Not
now without effect. Neither of these two men may know as yet in
what sense he is the Lamb of God, nor how by him their sin is to be
taken away ; but both have felt their need of some one willing and
able to guide their agitated hearts to a secure haven of rest, and they
hope to find in him thus pointed out the one they need. They fol-
low him. John restrains them not; it is as he would wish. Wil-
lingly, gladly he sees them part from him to follow this new Master.
He knows that they are putting themselves under a better, higher
guidance than any which he can give. But who are these two men ?
One of them is Andrew, better known to us by his brotherhood to
Simon. The other reveals himself by the very manner in which he
draws the veil over his own name. He would not name himself, and
by that very modesty which he displays he stands revealed. It is no
other than that disciple whom Jesus loved; no other than the writer
of this Gospel, upon whose memory those days of his first acquaint-
ance with Jesus had fixed themselves in the exact succession of their
incidents so indelibly, that though he writes his narrative at least
forty years after the death of Christ, he writes not only as an eye-
THE FIEST DISCIPLES. 105
witness, but as one who can tell day after day what happened ; and
uo doubt the day was memorable to him, and the very hour of that
day, on which he left the Baptist's side to join himself to Jesus.
John and Andrew follow Jesus. We wonder which of the two it
was that made the first movement towards him. Let us believe it to
have been John, that we may cherish the thought that he was the
first to follow as he was the last to leave. He was one at least of
the first two men who became followers of the Lamb; and that
because of their having heard him described as the Lamb of God.
When this first incident in his own connection with Jesus is consid-
ered, need we wonder that this epithet, "the Lamb," became so
favorite a one with John ; that it is in his writings, and in them alone
of all the writings of the New Testament, that it is to be found,
occurring nearly thirty times in the book of the Apocalypse.
The two disciples follow Jesus silently, respectfully, admiringly —
anxious to address him, yet unwilling to obtrude. He relieves them
from their embarrassment. The instinct of that love which is already
drawing them to him tells him that he is being followed for the first
time by human footsteps, answering to warm-beating, anxious human
hearts. He turns and says to them, "What seek ye?" A vague
and general question, which left it open to them to give any answer
that they pleased, to connect their movement with him or not. But
their true hearts speak out. It is not any short and hurried con-
verse by the way that will satisfy their ardent longings. They would
have hours with him, days with him alone in the seclusion of his
home. "Eabbi" — they say to him, the first time doubtless that
Jesus was ever so addressed — "where dwellest thou? He saith to
them, Come and see ; and they came and saw where he dwelt, and
abode with him that day, for it was about the tenth hour." If, in
his gospel, John numbers the hours of the day according to the Jew-
ish method of computation, then it must have been late in the after-
noon, at four o'clock, having but two hours of that day to run, that
Christ's invitation was given and accepted. We incline to believe,
however, that John follows not the Jewish, but the Roman method
of counting; and if so, then it was in the forenoon, at ten o'clock,
that the two disciples accompanied our Lord. And Ave are the rather
induced to believe so, as it gives room for the other incident, the
bringing of Simon to Jesus, to happen during the same day; which,
from the specific and journal -like character of this part of John's
narrative, we can scarcely help conceiving that he did.
But where and whose was the abode to which Jesus conducted
John and Andrew, and how were their hours employed ? It could
106 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
only have been some "house which the hospitality of strangers had
opened for a few days' residence to one whom they knew not, and
over all the intercourse that took place beneath its roof the veil is
drawn. It is the earliest instance this of that studied reserve as to
all the minuter details of Christ's daily life and conversation upon
»vhich we may have afterwards to offer some remarks. John has
not yet learned to lay his head on that Master's bosom, but already
he is sitting at his feet. And there for all day long, and on into the
quiet watches of the night, would he sit drinking in our Lord's first
opening of his great message of mercy from the Father. Andrew
has something of the restless, active spirit of his brother in him, and
so no sooner has he himself attained a sure conviction that this is
indeed the Christ whom he has found, than he hurries out to seek
his own brother Simon and bring him to Jesus. We should have
liked exceedingly to have been present at that interview, to have
stood by as Jesus for the first time looked at Simon, and Simon
for the first time fixed his eyes on Jesus. The Lord looks upon
Simon and sees all he is and all that he is yet to be. His great con-
fession, his three denials, his bitter repentance, his restoration, the
great services rendered, the death like that of his Master he is to die,
all are present to the thoughts of Jesus as he looks. " Thou art
Simon," he says at once to him, as if he had known him from hie
youth — "Simon, the son of Jona." This word Jona, in Hebrew,
means a dove, and it has been thought, fancifully perhaps, that it
was with a sidelong reference to the place of the dove's usual resort
that Jesus said : " Thou art Simon the son of the dove, which seeks
shelter in the rock ; thou shalt be called Cephas, shalt be the rock for
the dove to shelter in." On an after occasion Jesus explained more
fully why it was that this new name of Peter, the Rock, was bestowed.
Here we have nothing but the simple fact before us, that it was at
the first meeting of the two, and before any converse whatever took
place between them, that the change of name was announced ; with
what effect on Peter we are left to guess — his very silence, a silence
rather strange to him, the only thing to tell us how deep was the
impression made by this first interview with Christ.
The next day, the fifth from that on which this chronicling of the
days begins, Jesus goes forth on his return to Galilee, finds Philip
by the way, and saith to him, " Follow me !" Philip was of" Beth-
aaida. Bethsaida lay at the northern extremity of the sea of Galilee,
not on the line of Christ's route from Bethabara to Nazareth or Cana.
We infer from this circumstance that, like John, Andrew, and Peter,
Philip had left his home to attend on the ministry of the Baptist
THE FIRST DISCIPLES. 10/
On the banks of the Jordan, or afterwards from one or other of his
Galilean countrymen who had already joined themselves to Christ,
he had learned the particulars of his earlier earthly history. Any
difficulty that he might himself have had in recognizing the Messiah-
ship of one so born and educated was soon got over, the wonder at
last enhancing the faith. Finding Nathanael, Philip said to him:
" We have found him of whom Moses in the law and the prophets
did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph." It was a very nat-
ural reply for one who lived so near to Nazareth, and knew how insig-
nificant a place it was, to say : " Can there any good thing " — any such
good thing — "come out of Nazareth?" " Come and see!" was Phil-
ip's answer. It, proved the very simplicity and docility of Nathan-
ael's nature, that he did at once go to see. Perhaps, however, his
recent exercises had prepared him for the movement. Before Philip
called him, he had been under the fig-tree, the chosen place for med-
itation and prayer with the devout of Israel. There had he been
pondering in his heart, wondering when the Hope of Israel was to
come, and praying that it might be soon, when a friend comes and
tells him that the very one he has been praying for has appeared.
With willing spirit he accompanies his friend. Before, however, ho
gets close to him, Jesus says, " Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom
is no guile !" How much of that very guileless spirit which we have
learned to call by his name is there in Nathanael's answer ! Without
thinking that he is in fact accepting Christ's description of him as
true, and so exposing himself to the charge of no small amount of
arrogance, disproving in fact that charge by the very blindness that
he shows to the expression of it, he says : " Whence knowest thou
me ?" Our Lord's reply, " Before that Philip called theo, when thou
wast under the fig-tree, I saw thee," we may regard as carrying more
with it to the conscience and heart of Nathanael than the mere proof
that Christ's eye saw what no human eye, placed as he was at the
time, could have seen, but that the secrets of all hearts lay open to
Him with whom he had now to do. Nathanael comes with doubting
mind, but a guileless heart; and so now, without dealing with it intel-
lectually, the doubt is scattered by our Lord's quick glance penetra-
ting into his inner spirit, and an instant and sure faith is at once
planted in Nathanael's breast.
I am apt to think from the very form of Nathanael's answer, from
the occurrence in it of a phrase that does not seem to have been ft
Jewish synonym for the Messiah, that Nathanael too had been at the
Jordan, and had heard there the testimony that John had borne to
Jesus. 'Rabbi,' he says, 'thou art what I have lately heaid thee
108 THE LITE OE CHRIST.
Balled, and wondered at their calling thee ;" Thou art the Son of God.
thou art the ting of Israel.'" ' There was something so fresh, sc
fervent; so full-hearted in the words, they fell so pleasantly on the
ear of Jesus, that a bright vision rose before his eye of the richer
tilings that were yet in store for all that believed on him. First, he
?ays to Nathanael individually, "Because I said unto thee. I saw thee
under the fig-tree, believest thou ? thou shalt see greater things than
these;" and then looking on the others, while still addressing him-
self to him, he adds : " Verily, verily I say unto you. hereafter, or
rather from this time forward, ye shall see heaven open, and the
angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. Tou
liave heard, that a few weeks ago. on the banks of the river, the
heavens opened for a moment above my head, and the Spirit was
seen coming down like a dove upon me. That was but a sign.
Believe what that sign was meant to confirm ; believe in me as the
Lamb of God, the Saviour of the world, the baptizer with the Holy
Ghost, and your eye of faith shall be quickened, and you shall see
those heavens standing continually open above my head — opened by
me for you; and the angels of God — all beings and things that cany
on the blessed ministry of reconciliation between earth and heaven,
between the sonls of believers below and the heavenly Father above —
going up and bringing blessings innumerable down, ascending and
descending upon the Son of man. Son of God — my Father called
me so at my baptism, the devil tempted me as such in the desert, the
Baptist gave me that name at Bethabara, and thou, Xathanael, hast
bestowed it on me now once again; but the name that I now like
best, and shall oftenest call myself, is that of the Son of man; and
vet i am both, and in being both, truly and eternally fulfil the dream
of Bethel. It was but in a clreara that your father Jacob saw that
ladder set up on earth, whose top reached to heaven, up and dovsn
which the angels were ever moving. It shall be in no drearo of the
night, but in the clearest vision of the day — in the hours when the
things of the unseen world shall stand most truly and vividly re-
vealed — you -huh see in me that ladder of all gracious communica-
tion between earth and heaven, my humanity fixing firmly the one
end of that ladder on earth, in my divinity the other end of that lad-
der lost amid the splendors of the throne."
At first sight the narrative of these five days after the temptation,
which we have thus followed to its close, has but little to attract. It
recounts what many might regard as the comparatively insignificant
fact of the attachment of five men — all of them Galileans, none of
them of any note or rank among the people — to Christ. But oi
THE FIRST DISCIPLES. 109
these five men, four afterwards became apostles; (all of them, indeed,
if, as is believed by many of our best critics, Nathanael and Barthol-
omew were the same person;) and two of them, Peter and John, are
linked together in the everlasting remembrance of that church which
they helped to found. Had the Baptist's ministry clone nothing more
than prepare those five men for the reception of the Messiah, and
hand them over so prepared to Jesus, to become the first apostles of
the faith, it had not been in vain. These five men were the first dis-
ciples of Jesus, and in the narrative of their becoming so we have
the history of the infancy of the church of the living God, that great
community of the saints, that growing and goodly company, swel] ing
out to a multitude that no man can number, out of every kindred,
and tongue, and people, and nation. If there be any interest in tra-
cing the great river that bears at last on its broad bottom the vessels
of many lands, to some little bubbling fountain up among the hills ;
if there be any interest in tracing the great monarchy whose power
overshadowed the earth, to the erection of a little organized commu-
nity among the Sabine hills ; if the traveller regards with wonder the
little gushing stream, or the historian the first weak beginnings of
the Roman commonwealth ; then may the same emotion be permit-
ted to the Christian as he reads the page that tells of the first foun-
dations being laid of a spiritual kingdom, which is to outlive all the
kingdoms of this earth, and abide in its glory for ever.
Still another interest attaches to the narrative now before us. II
tells us of the variety of agencies employed in bringing the first oi
his disciples to Christ. Two of these five men acted on the prompt-
ings of the Baptist, one of them on the direct call or summons of oui
Lord himself ; one at the instance of a brother, one on the urgency
of a friend. It would be foolish to take these cases of adherence to
the Christian cause as typical or representative of the numbers brought
respectively to Christ by the voice of the preacher, the word of Christ
himself, and the agency of relative or acquaintance ; but we cannot
go wrong in regarding this variety of agency within so narrow limits,
as warranting all means and methods by which any can be won to
a true faith in Christ. Whatever these means and methods may be,
in order to be effectual they must finally resolve themselves into
direct individual address. It was in this way the first Gxe disciples
were gathered in. By John speaking to two, Jesus to one, Andrew
to one, Philip to one. It is the same species of agency similarly
employed which God has always most richly blessed ; the direct, ear-
nest, loving appeal of one man to his acquaintance, relative, or friend.
How many are there among us who have been engaged f< r years
110 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
eithsr in supporting by our liberality, or aiding by our actual service
3ne or other of those societies whose object is to spread Christianity,
but who may seldom if ever have endeavored, by direct and personal
address, to influence one human soul for its spiritual and eternal
good ! Not till more of the spirit of Jesus and John, of Andrew and
Philip, as exhibited in this passage, descend upon us, shall we rightly
acquit ourselves of our duty as followers of the Lamb.
But in my mind the chief interest of the passage lies in the con-
duct of our Lord himself. Those five days were not only the birth-
time of the church, they were the beginning of Christ's public minis-
try, and how does that ministry open ? Silently, gently, unostenta-
tiously ; no public appearances, no great works done, no new instru-
mentality employed ; by taking two men to live with him for a day,
by asking another to follow him, by dealing wisely and tenderly and
encouragingly with two others who are brought to him — so enters
the Lord upon the earthly task assigned to him. Would any one
sitting down to devise a career for the Son of God descending upon
our earth to work out the salvation of our race, have assigned such
an opening to his ministry ? and yet could any thing have been more
appropriate to him who came not to be ministered unto but to minis-
ter, than this turning away from being ministered unto by the angels
In the desert, to the rendering of those kindly and all-important ser-
vices to John and Andrew and Peter and Philip and Nathanael ?
XL
The First Miracle.*
"And the third day there was a marriage in Cana of Galilee."
Looking back to the preceding narrative, you observe that from the
time of the arrival at Bethabara of the deputation from Jerusalem
sent to inquire into the Baptist's character and claims, an exact note
of the time is kept in recording the incidents which followed. " The
next day/' that is, the first after that of the appearance of the depu-
tation, John sees Jesus coming unto him, and points him out as the
"Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world." "Again
the next day after," standing in company with two of his disciples,
John repeats the testimony, and the two disciples followed Jesus;
one of them, Andrew, going and bringing his own brother Simon,
the other John, sitting at his new Master's feet. " The day follow-
* John 2 : 1-12.
THE FIKST MIEACLE. Ill
ing, : ' Jesus, setting out on his return to Galilee, findeth Philip. Phil*
ip findeth Nathanael, and so, accompanied by these five, (Andrew,
John, Peter, Philip, and Nathanael,) Jesus proceeds upon his way
back to his home. Occurring in a narrative like this, where the reg-
ular succession of events is so accurately chronicled, we naturally,
in coming to the expression, "the third day," interpret it as meaning
the third day after the one that had immediately before been spoken
of, that is, the one of Christ's departure from the banks of the Jor-
dan Two days' easy travel carries him and his new attendants to
Nazareth ; but there is no one there to receive them. The mother of
Jesus and his brethren are at Cana, a village lying a few miles farther
to the north. Thither they follow him, and find that a marriage is
being celebrated there, to the feast connected with which Jesus and
his five disciples are invited. One of the five, Nathanael, belonged
to Cana, and may have received the invitation on his own account
as an acquaintance of the family in whose house the marriage feast
was held. But the others were strangers, only known to that family
as having accompanied Jesus for the last few days — their tie of dis-
cipleship to him quite a recent one, and as yet scarcely recognized
by others. That on his account alone, and in consequence of a con-
nection with him of such a kind, they should have been at once asked
to be present at an entertainment to which friends and relatives only
were ordinarily invited, would seem to indicate some familiar bond
between the family at Nazareth and the one in which this marriage
occurs. The idea of some such relationship is supported by the free-
dom which Mary appears to exercise, speaking to the servants not
like a stranger, but as one familiar in the dwelling. Besides, if
Simon, called the Canaanite, was called so because of his connection
with the village of Cana, his father Alphseus or Cleophas, who was
married to a sister of Christ's mother, may have resided there, and it
may have been in his family that this marriage occurred. Could we
but be sure of this — which certainly is probable, and which early tra-
dition affirms — the circumstance that when Jesus seated himself at
this marriage feast he sat down at a table around which mother,
and brothers and sisters, and uncle and aunt, and cousins of his own
now gathered, it would give a peculiarly domestic character to the
scene, and tnrow a new charm and interest around the miracle which
was wrought at it. At any rate, we may assume that it was in a fam-
ily connected by some close ties, whether of acquaintance or relation-
ship, with that of Jesus that the marriage feast was kept.
"And whe*L they wanted wine, the mother of Jesus saith to him,
They have no wine." The wine, provided only for the original
H2 THE LIFE OF 0HB1ST.
aumber of guests, began to fail. Mary, evidently watching with a
kind and womanly interest the progress of the feast, and perhaps
ascribing the threatened exigency to the unexpected arrival of her
son and his companions, becomes doubly anxious to shield a family
in which she took such an interest from the painful feeling of having
failed in the duties of hospitality. But why did Mary, seeing what
she did, and feeling as she did, go to Jesus and say to him, " They
have no wine"? That she expected him in some way to interfere is
evident ; but what ground had she to expect that he would do so in
any such manner as he did? She had never seen him work a miracle
before. She had no reason, from past experience, to believe that ho
would or could make wine at will, or that by his word of power he
would supply the deficiency. She had, however, been laying up in
her heart, and for thirty years revolving all that had been told her at
the beginning about her son. She had none at Nazareth but Joseph
to speak to ; none but he who would have believed her had she
spoken. Joseph now is dead, and she is left to nurse the swelling
hope in her solitary breast. At last the period comes, when rumors
of the great preacher of repentance who has appeared in the wilder-
ness of Judea, and to whom the whole country is rushing, spread
over Galilee. Her son hears them, and rises from his work, and bids
her adieu ; the first time that he has parted from her since she had
lost him in Jerusalem, now eighteen years ago. What can be his
object in leaving her, his now widowed mother ? She learns — per-
haps he himself tells her — that he goes with other Galileans who
want to see and hear the new teacher, it may be to enroll themselves
by baptism as his disciples. She asks about this new teacher. Can
it be that she discovers him to be no other than the son of her rela-
tive Elisabeth, whose birth was in so strange a manner linked with
that of Jesus? If so, into what a tumult of expectation must she
have been thrown.
But whether knowing aught of this or not, now at last, after a two
months' absence, her son rejoins her, strangely altered in his bear-
ing; attended, too, by those who, young as he is, hail him as their
Master and pay him all possible respect. She scarcely ventures to
ask him what has happened in the interval of his absence ; but them
she fully questions ; and as they tell her that John has publicly pro-
claimed her son to be no other than He whose coming it was his
great object to announce; had pointed to him as the Lamb of God,
the Son of God, the Baptizer with the Holy Ghost ; as they tell that
they had found in him the Messias, the Christ, of whom Moses in
the law and the prophets did write, and that it was as such they were
THE FIRST MIRACLE. 113
now following him — to what a pitch of joyful expectation must she
uave been raised. Now at last the day so long looked for has come.
Men have begun to see in him, her son, the Hope of Israel. Soon all
Israel shall hail him as their Messiah. Meanwhile he is here among
friends and relatives; has willingly accepted the invitation given to
join this marriage-feast ; has lost nothing, as it would seem, of all his
early kindly feelings to those around him. What will he think, what
will he do, if he be told that owing to his presence, and that of his
disciples, a difficulty has arisen, and discredit is likely to be thrown
upon this family, which has shown itself so ready to gratify him, by
asking these strangers to share in the festivities of the occasion ? She
thinks, perhaps, of the cruse of oil, of the barley-loaves of the old
prophets. Surely if her son be that great Prophet that is to appear,
he might do something to provide for this unforeseen emergency; to
meet this want ; to keep the heart of this poor, perhaps, but generous
household from being wounded. But what shall she ask him to do ?
what shall she suggest ? She will leave that to himself. She knows
how kind in heart, how wise in counsel he is, and believes now that
his power is equal to his will. She modestly contents herself with
simply directing his attention to the fact, and saying to him, " They
have no wine."
It is the very delicacy of this approach and address which renders
so remarkable our Lord's reply, "Woman, what have I to do with
fchee?" — exactly the same form of expression which, on more than
one occasion, the demons, whom he was about to dispossess, address-
ed to Jesus, when they said to him, "What have we to do with
thee?" or, "What hast thou to do with us, Jesus, thou Son of God?"
On their part such language implied a repudiation of his interference ;
a denial of and a desire to resist his power and authority. And what
can the same form of expression mean as addressed now by Jesus to
his mother? Interpret it as we may; soften it to the uttermost so as
to remove any thing like harshness ; still it is the language of resist-
ance and reproof. There may have been some over-haste or impa-
tience on Mary's part; some motherly vanity mingling with her de-
sire to see her son exert his power, and reveal his character before
these assembled guests, which required to be gently checked; but
our Lord's main object in speaking to her as he did, was to teach
Mary that the period of his subjection to her maternal authority had
expired; that in the new character he had assumed, in Lhat new
sphere of action upon which he had entered, it was not for her, upon
the ground simply of her relationship to him, to dictate or suggest
what he should do. There was some danger of her forgetting this ;
Wf« of Christ. 8
114 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
of lier cherishing and acting on the belief that he was still to be he*
son, as he had been throughout those thirty by-past years. It was
right, it was even kind, that at the very outset she should be guarded
against this danger, and saved the disappointment she might have
felt had the limits of her influence and authority been left vague and
undefined. Jesus would, therefore, have her to know definitely, and
from the beginning of his ministry, that mother though she was as to
his humanity, this gave her no right to interfere with him as the Son
of the Highest, the Saviour of mankind. Thus gently but firmly
does he repel the bringing of her maternal relationship to bear upon
his Messianic work; thus gently but firmly does he assert and vindi-
cate his perfect independence, disengaging himself from this the
closest of earthly ties, that he may stand free in all things to do only
the will of his Father in heaven. This manner of his conduct to the
mother whom he so tenderly loved, may be regarded as the first of
those repeated rebukes which Jesus gave by anticipation to that idol-
atrous reverence which has carried the human bond into the spiritual
kingdom ; carried it even into the heavenly places ; exalting Mary as
the queen of heaven ; seating the crowned mother on a throne some-
times on a level with, sometimes above that occupied by her Son,
teaching us to pray to her as an equal intercessor with Christ.
"Woman, what have I to do with thee? Mine hour is not yet
come." With him no impatience, no undue haste, no hurrying pre-
maturely into action. He has waited quietly those thirty years,
without a single trial of that superhuman strength which lay in him,
content to bide till the set time came. And now he waits, even as to
the performance of his first miracle, till the right and foreseen hour for
its performance has arrived. As to this act of his power, and as to
every act of it ; as to this incident of his life, and as to every incident
of it — he could tell when the hour had not come, and when it had.
He who at this marriage-feast could say to Mary, "Mine hour is not
yet come," could say to the Omniscient in the upper chamber at
Jerusalem, "Father, the hour is come, glorify thy Son." Mapped
out before his foreseeing eye in all its times, places, events, issues,
lay the whole of his earthly life and ministry. The perfect unbroken
unity of design and action running throughout the whole proclaims a
previous foresight, a premeditated, well-ordered plan. It has not
been so with any of those men who have played the greatest and
most prominent parts on the stage of human history. Their own
confessions, the story of their lives, their earlier compared with their
later acts, all tell us how little they knew or thought beforehand of
what they finally were to be and do. Instead of one fixed, uniform.
THE FIRST MIRACLE. 115
anchanging scheme and purpose running through and regulating
the whole life, in all its lesser as well as its greater movements,
there have been shiftings and changings of place to suit the shift-
*jQg3 and the changes of circumstances. Surprisals here, disappoint-
ments there; old instruments of action worn out and thrown away,
new ones invented and employed; the life made up of a motley array
of many-colored incidents, out of which have come issues never
dreamed of at the beginning. Was it so with the life that Jesus lived
on earth? Had he been a mere man, committing himself to a great
work under the guidance of a sublime, yet purely human, and there-
fore weak and blind impulse, had he seen only so far into the future
as the unaided human eye could carry, how much was there in the
earlier period of his ministry to have excited false hopes, how much
in the latter to have produced despondency! Bu't the people came
in multitudes around him, and you can trace no sign of extravagant
expectation. The tide of popular favor ebbs away from him, and
you see no token of his giving up his enterprise in despair. No
wavering of purpose, no change of plan, no altering of his course to
suit new and obviously unforeseen emergencies. There is progress : a
steady advance onward to the final consummation of the cross and
the burial, the resurrection and ascension ; but all is consistent, all is
harmonious. The attempt has been lately made, with all the re-
sources of scholarship and all the skill of genius, to detect a discrep-
ancy of design and expectation between the opening and closing
stages of our Saviour's earthly course. It has failed. I cannot help
thinking that all candid and intelligent readers of that life as we
have it in the gospels, whatever be their religious opinions or prepos-
sessions, will acknowledge that M. Eenan's failure is patent and com-
plete. If so, it leaves that life of Jesus Christ distinguished from all
others by a fixed, preestablished, unvarying design.*
* This feature in our Lord's character appears to have strongly impressed the
mind of Napoleon I. , as appears from the following extracts :
"In every other life than that of Christ, what imperfections, what inconsis-
tencies ! Where is the character that no opposition is sufficient to overwhelm ?
Where is the individual whose conduct is never modified by event or circum-
stance, who never yields to the influences of the time, never accommodates him-
self to manners of passions that he cannot prevail to alter ?
"I defy you to cite another life like that of Christ, exempt from the least
vacillation of this kind, untainted by any suoh blots or wavering purpose. From
first to last he is the same ; always the same, majestic and simple, infinitely
severe and infinitely gentle ; throughout a life that may be said to have been
lived under the public eye, Jesus never gives occasion to find fault ; the pru-
dence of his conduct compels our admiration by its union of i'oree ami gentle-
116 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Oar Lord's answer to Mary was ill-fitted, we might imagine, to
foster hope, postponing apparently to an indefinite period any inter-
position on his part. And yet she tnrns instantly to the servants,
and says to them: "Whatsoever he saith unto you, do it." However
surprised or perplexed she may have been, she appeared as confident
as ever that he would interpose. It may have been her strong and
hopeful faith which, notwithstanding the discouraging reply, sus-
tained her expectation; or there may have been something in the
tone and manner of her son, something in the way he laid the empha-
sis as he pronounced the words, "Mine hour is not yet come," which
conveyed to her the impression that the hour was approaching, was
near, a speedy compliance shining through the apparent refusal.
ness. Alike in speech and action, Jesus is enlightened, consistent, and calm.
Sublimity is said to be an attribute of divinity ; what name then shall we give tc
him in whose character were united every attribute of the sublime ?
"I know men ; and I tell you that Jesus is not a man.
"In Lycurgus, Numa, Confucius, and Mahomet, I only see legislators who
having attained to the first place in the state, have sought the best solution of
the social problem ; I see nothing in them that reveals Divinity ; they themselves
have not pitched their claims so high.
'* It is evident that it is only posterity that has deified the world's first despots,
heroes, the princes of the nations, and the founders of the earliest republics
For my part, I see in the heathen gods and those great men, beings of the same
nature with myself. Their intelligence, after all, differs from mine only in form.
They burst upon the world, played a great part in their day, as I have done in
mine. Nothing in them proclaims divinity : on the contrary, I see numerous
resemblances between them and me, common weaknesses and errors. Their facul-
ties are such as I myself possess ; there is no difference save in the use that we
have made of them, in accordance with the different ends we had in view, our dif-
ferent countries and the circumstances of our times,
"It is not so with Christ. Every thing in him amazes me ; his spirit out-
reaches mine, and his will confounds me. Comparison is impossible between
him and any other being in the world. He is truly a being by himself : his
ideas and his sentiments, the truth that he announces, his manner of convincing,
are all beyond humanity and the natural order of things.
"His birth, and the story of his life, the profoundness of his doctrine which
overturns all difficulties, and is their most complete solution, his gospel, the sin-
gularity of this mysterious being, his appearance, his enrpire, his progress through
all centuries and kingdoms, all this is to me a prodigy, an unfathomable mystery,
which-plunges me into a reverie from which there is no escape, a mystery which
is ever within my view, a permanent mystery which I can neither deny nor
explain.
"I see nothing here of man. Near as I may approach, closely as I may ex-
amine, all remains above my comprehension, great with a greatness that crushes
me ; it is in vain that I reflect — all remains unaccountable. " Sentiments
leon sur le Christianisme. par le Chevalier de Beauterne.
THE FIRST MIRACLE. 117
But why did she give that order to the servants, or how could she
anticipate that it was through their instrumentality that the ap-
proaching supply was to be conveyed? Without some hint being
given, some word or look of Jesus pointing in that direction, she
sould scarcely have conjectured beforehand what the mode of his
iction was to be.
Leaving the mystery which arises here unresolved, as being left
without the key to open it, let us look at the simple, easy, unostenta-
tious way in which the succeeding miracle was wrought. There
stand — at the entrance, perhaps, of the dwelling — six water-pots
of stone; Jesus saith to the servants, "Fill the water-pots with water."
They did so, tilling them to the brim. Jesus saith, "Draw out now,
and bear unto the governor of the feast." They do so ; it is not water,
but choicest wine they bear ! The ruler of the feast at once detects it
as better wine than they had previously been drinking, and addresses
the bridegroom. The latter gives no reply, for he does not know
whence or how this new supply of better wine has come. As little
know the guests who partake of it; nor, perhaps, till the feast is over,
and the servants tell what has been done, is it known by what a mir-
acle of power the festivities of that social board have been sustained.
What a veiling this of the hand and power of the operator ! Imagine
only that Jesus had asked the servants, while the water was water
still, to draw it out and fill each goblet; had asked each guest to lift
up his cup and taste, and see what kind of liquid it contained ; and
then, by a word of his power, had turned the crystal water into the
ruddy wine ! With what gaping wonder would every one have then
been filled! Instead of this, ordering it so that what came to the
guests appeared to come through the ordinary channel, without word
or touch, aught said or done, in obedience to an inward volition of
the Lord, the water hidden in the vessels is changed instantaneously
into wine. There was the same dignified ease and simplicity, the
same absence of ostentation about all Christ's miracles, proper to
him who used not a delegated, but an intrinsic power.
Struck with the manner in which Christ met the domestic need
acd protected the family character, we must not overlook the large-
ness of the provision that he made. At the most moderate computa-
tion, the six water-pots must have held far more than enough to meet
the requirements of the marriage-feast; enough of wine for that
household for many months to come. In the overflowing generosity
of his kindness, he does so much more than Mary would have asked
cr could have conceived. And still, to all who feel their need and
come to him to have their spiritual wants supplied,, he does exceed-
118 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ingly abundantly above all that they ask and all that they can
think.
When the governor of the feast had tasted the new-made wine,
he called the bridegroom and said to him, " Every man at the begin-
ning doth set forth good wine ; and when men have well drunk, thee
that which is worse; but thou hast kept the good wine until now."
He knew not whence that better wine had come ; he knew not to whom
it was they owed it ; he knew not that, in contrasting as he did the
custom of keeping the best wine to the last with that commonly fol-
lowed at marriage-feasts he was but showing forth, as in a figure, the
way in which the spiritual Bridegroom acts to all those who are called
to the marriage-supper of the Lamb. Not as the world giveth gives
Jesus to his own. The world gives its best and richest first. At the
board which it spreads the viands may not fail; nay, may even grow
in number and improve in quality ; but soon they pall on the sated
appetite, and the end of the world's feast is always worse and less
enjoyable than the beginning. Who has found it so of the provisions
of a Saviour's grace — of those quiet, soothing, satisfying pleasures
that true faith in him imparts? The more of these that any one
receives, the more he enjoys them. The appetite grows with the
food it feeds upon ; the relish increases with the appetite ; better
and better things are still provided, and of each new cup of pleasure
put into our hands, turning to the heavenly Provider, we may say,
" Thou hast kept the good wine even until now."
This, the beginning of his miracles, did Jesus in Cana of Galilee.
The miracle lay in the instantaneous transmutation of water into
wine. And yet the water with which those water-pots were filled,
and in which this change was wrought, might have been drawn from
the well of a vineyard, and instead of being poured into these stone
vessels, might have been poured out over the soil into which the
vine-plants struck their roots, and by these roots might have been
drawn up into the stem, and through the branches been distilled into
the grapes, and out of the grapes been pressed into the vat, and in
that vat have fermented into wine. And thus, by the many steps
and secret processes of nature might that water without a miracle, as
we say, have been converted into wine. But is each step or stage of
that natural transmutation less wonderful? Does it show inferior
wisdom? Is it done by a feebler power? Just as little can we
explain the process as spread out into multiplied details in the groat
laboratory of nature as when condensed into one single act. And
just as much should we see the divine hand and power in the one as
in the other. He who sees God in the one — the miracle, and net in
THE FIRST MIRACLE. 119
tlie other, the processes of nature — has not the right faith in God.
If we did not believe that God was operating throughout, working
everywhere, his will and power the spring and support of every move-
ment in the material creation, we should not believe that he is oper-
ating here or there, in this miracle or in that. It is because we
believe in the universal agency of the living God that we are pre-
pared to believe in that agency in any singular form that it occasion-
ally may take. There is, indeed, a difference between a miracle and
any of the ordinary operations of nature ; a difference not in the agent,
not in the power, but simply in the manner in which the power and
agency are employed. In the one, the hand of the great Operator
works slowly, uniformly, doing the same things always in the same
way; his footsteps follow each other so surely and so regularly that,
by a delusion of the understanding, we come to think that the things
that follow each other so uniformly are not only naturally but neces-
sarily linked to one another — the one by some imagined inherent
power drawing the other after it ; needing no power but their own to
bind them together at the first, or keep them bound together after-
wards. Wherever there is orderly succession — and it pervades the
whole universe of material things — we can classify the different pro-
cesses that go on, and so reach what we call the laws of nature, which,
after all, are but expressions of the orderly manner in which certain
results are brought about ; but to these laws, as if they were living
things, and had a vital power and energy belonging to them, we come
to attribute the actual accomplishment of the result. It happens
thus that the works of his hands in the midst of which we live, and
which, for his glory and our good, the great Creator and Sustainer
makes to move on with such fixed and orderly, stately and beautiful
array, instead of being a clear translucent medium through which we
see him, become often as a thick obscuring veil, hiding him from our
sight. Hence the use of miracles, that He who worketh all in all,
and worketh thus, should sometimes break as it were this order, that
through the rent we might see the hand which had been hidden
behind that self-constructed veil.
And yet when we speak thus of a miracle as a breaking-in upon
the ordinary and established course of nature, let us not think of it
as if it were discord thrust into a harmony ; something loose, irreg-
ular, disjointed, coming in to mar the beautiful and orderly progres-
sion. In that harmonious progression, the lower ever yields to the
higher. The vital powers, for instance, in plants and animate, are
ever modifying the mechanical powers, the laws of motion ; the will
of man comes in, in still more striking manner, to do the same thing
120 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
with all the powers and processes of nature. You do not say that
such crossings and counteractions of lower by higher laws disturb
the harmony of nature ; they help to constitute it. And we believe
that just as falsely as you would say that the order of nature was
broken, the law of gravitation was violated, when the sap ascends
ui the stem of the tree, and is distributed upwards through its
branches ; just as falsely is it said of the miracles of Christianity, that
they break that order, or violate any of nature's laws; for did we but
know enough of that spiritual kingdom for whose establishment and
advancement they were wrought, we should perceive that here too
there was law and order, and that what we now call miracles were
but instances of the lower yielding to the higher; that the grand,
unbroken harmony of the vast universe, material, mental, moral,
spiritual, may be sustained and promoted.
This beginning of miracles did Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and man-
ifested forth his glory. The glory that was thus revealed lay not so
much in the forthputting of almighty power (for it is an inferior glory
that the bare exercise of any power, though it be divine, displays)
as in the manner in which the power is exercised, the ends it is put
forth to accomplish. Power appears here as the handmaid and min-
ister of loving kindness, and gathers thus a richer glory than its own
around it. Never let us forget that the first act of our Lord's public
life was to grace a marriage by his presence. By doing so, he has
for ever consecrated that and every other human bond and relation-
ship. And the first exercise of his almighty power was to minister
to the enjoyment of a marriage-feast. He who would not in the
extremity of hunger employ his power to procure food for himself,
put it forth to increase the comforts of others. By doing so, he has
for ever consecrated all the innocent enjoyments of life. It will not
do to say that his example here is no pattern to us; that what was
safe for him might be injurious to us ; for he not only accepted the
invitation for himself, but took his disciples along with him to the
main' age-feast. There is something peculiarly striking and instruc-
tive in our Lord's coming so directly from consort with the austere
ascetic preacher of the wilderness, and carrying along with him these
first disciples, the majority of whom had been John's disciples before
they were his, and seating them by his side at this festive board.
Does it not teach what the genius and spirit of his religion is? That
it affects not the desert; that it shuns not the fellowship of man;
that it frowns not on social joys and pleasures; that it reioices as
readily with those who rejoice as it weeps with those who weep;
ready to be with us in our hours of gladness, as well as in our hours
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE. 121
of grief. Let no table be spread to which He who graced the mar-
riage-feast at Cana could not be invited; let no pleasure be indulged
in which could not live in the light of his countenance. Let his pres-
ence and blessing be with us and upon us wherever we go and how-
ever we are engaged ; and is the way not open by which the miracle
of Cana may, in spirit, be repeated daily still, and the water of every
earthly enjoyment turned into the very wine of heaven ?
XII.
The Cleansing of the Temple.*
The miracle at the marriage-feast drew a marked line of distinG
tion between the divine Teacher and the austere Essenes, those ere
mites who dwelt apart, shut up in a kind of monastic seclusion, and
who renounced the use of wine, condemned marriage, and denounced
all bodily indulgence as injurious to the purity of the spirit. By act-
ing as he did at Cana, Jesus at the very outset of his career placed
himself in direct opposition to the strictest class of pietists then exist-
ing — in direct opposition to the spirit and practice of those in all
ages who have sought, by withdrawal from the world and estrange-
ment from all objects of sense, to cultivate communion with the
unseen, to rise to a closer intercourse with and nearer resemblance to
the Deity.
One effect of this first display by Jesus of his supernatural power
was a strengthening of the faith of the men who had recently attached
themselves to him. "His disciples," it is said, "believed in him."
They had believed before, but they believed more firmly now. The
ground of their first faith had been the testimony of the Baptist.
Then 1 faith had grown during the few days of private intercourse with
Jesus which succeeded, and now by the manifestation of his power
and glory it was still more strengthened. It was still, as later trial
too clearly proved, weak and imperfect. But their minds and hearts
were in such a condition that they lay open to the influence of addi-
tional light as to their Master's character, additional evidence of his
authority and power. But there were other spectators of the mira-
cle upon whom it exerted no such happy influence. After the mar-
riage-feast at Cana broke up, "Jesus and his mother, and his breth-
ren, and his disciples went down to Capernaum." This is the first
mention of those brethren of Christ who appear more than ouc<> in
« Jolm 2 : 12-21 : Matt. 21 : 10-17.
122 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
tlie subsequent history, always associated with Mary, as forming part
of her family, carefully distinguished from the apostles and disciples
of the Lord. They are represented on one occasion as going out
after him, thinking he was beside himself; and when he was told that
Mary and they stood at the outskirts of the crowd desiring to see
aim, he exclaimed, " Who is my mother, and who are my brethren ?
Whosoever shall do the will of my Father who is in heaven, the same
is my brother, and sister, and mother." On another occasion, the
Nazarenes referred to them when, astonished and offended, they said
to one another, "Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother
called Mary, and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and
Judas ? And his sisters, are they not all with us ?" John tells us
that at a still later period, in the beginning of the last year of our
Lord's ministry, these relatives taunted him, "saying, If thou do
these things, show thyself to the world; for neither did his brethren
believe in him." Had we been reading these passages for the first
time, we should scarcely have understood them otherwise than as
referring to those who were related to Jesus as children of the same
mother. This would of course imply that Mary had other children
than Jesus, an idea to which from the earliest period there seems to
have been the strongest repugnance. Besting upon the well-known
usage which allowed the term brother and sister to be extended to
more distant relationships, and upon the acknowledged difficulty
which arises in connection with the names of our Lord's brothers as
given by the evangelists, both the Greek and the Latin churches,
though adopting different theories as to the exact nature of the rela-
tionship, have indignantly repudiated the idea of Mary's having any
but one child, and have regarded those spoken of as his brothers as
being either his half-brothers, sons of Joseph by another marriage,
or his cousins, the children of Mary's sister, the wife of Alphseus or
Cleophas. It would be out of place here to enter upon the discus-
sion of this difficult question. I can only say that, after weighing all
the objections which have been adduced, I can see no sufficient rea-
son for rejecting the first and most natural reading of the passages
I have referred to, for not believing that they were brothers and sis-
ters of Jesus, who grew up along with him in the household at Naza-
reth. Perhaps our readiness to admit this may partly spring from
our not sharing the impression that there is any thing in such a
belief either derogatory to the character of Mary, or to the true dig-
nity of her first-born Son.
Whoever they were, and however related to him, these brethren
of the Lord, his nearest relatives, who had all along been living, if
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE. 123
not under the same roof, yet in close and intimate acquaintance with
him, sat beside his disciples at that marriage-feast, and saw the won-
der that was done, and they did not believe. As months rolled on,
they saw and heard of still greater wonders wrought in the presence
of multitudes. Residing with Mary at Capernaum, they lived in the
very heart of that commotion which the teaching and acts of Jesus
excited. Neither did they then believe. Their unbelief may have
been in part sustained by Christ's having ceased to make their home
his home, and chosen twelve strangers as his close and constant com-
panions and friends. Nor did any of them believe in Jesus all through
the three years of his ministry. But it is pleasing to note that, though
so long and so stubbornly maintained, their unbelief did at last give
way ; you see them in that upper room to which the apostles retired
after witnessing the ascension: "And when they were come in, they
went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter and James,
and John and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Mat-
thew, James the son of Alphseus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the
brother of James. These all continued with one accord in prayer
and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus,
and with his brethren." How many an apt remark on the peculiar
barriers which the closer ties of domestic life often oppose to the
influence of the one Christian member of a household, and on the
peculiar encouragement which such a one has to persevere, might be
grounded upon the fact that it was not till after his death that our
Lord's own immediate relatives believed in him.
When the marriage-feast at Cana was over, Jesus and his mother,
and his brethren, and his disciples went down to Capernaum. Of
this town we shall have more to say hereafter, when it became the
chosen centre of our Lord's Galilean ministry. One advantage of
the short visit that Jesus now paid to it was, that it put him on the
route along which the already gathering bands of visitors from North-
ern Galilee passed southwards to the capital. The Passover was at
hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. Hitherto, though some time
had passed (two or three months perhaps, but there are no materials
for exactly determining) since his baptism and the public proclama-
tion of his Messiahship, Jesus had taken no public step, none imply-
ing any assumption on his part of the office to which he had been
designated. Of the few men who attended him, there was but one
whom he had asked to follow him ; nor was it yet understood whether
he and the rest were to accompany him for more than a few days.
The miracle at Cana was rather of a private aud domestic than of a
public character. Nothing that we know of was said or done by
124 THE LIFE OF C HEIST.
Jesus at Capernaum, or throughout the short visit to Galilee, to indi-
cate his entrance on a public career.
But now he is in Jerusalem, in the place where most appropri-
ately the first revelation of himself in his new character is made.
Let us acknowledge that it is not in the form in which we should
have expected it; nor in that form in which any Jew of that age
would ever have imagined that the Messiah would first show himself.
We may be able, by meditating a little upon it, to see more of its
suitableness than at first sight appears. But even a first glance
reveals how utterly unlike it was to the popular Jewish conception of
the advent of the Messiah. One of the first things our Lord does at
Jerusalem is to go up into the temple. He passes through one of
the gates of its surrounding walls. He enters into the large open
area which on all sides encompasses the sacred edifice. "What a spec-
tacle meets his eye ! There all round, attached to the walls, are lines
of booths or shops in which money-changers are plying their usuri-
ous trade. The centre space is crowded with oxen and with sheep
exposed for sale, and between the buyers and the sellers all the tur-
bulent traffic of a cattle-market is going on. It goes on within the
outer enclosure, but close upon the inner courts of the holy place ;
so close that the loud hum from the crowded court of the Gentiles
must have been heard to their no small disturbance by the priests
and worshippers within. How comes all this ? and who is responsi-
ble for this desecration of the temple ? The origin of it in one sense
was natural enough. At all the great festivals, but especially at the
Passover, an almost inconceivable number of animals were offered up
in sacrifice. Josephus tells us of more than two hundred thousand
victims sacrificed in the course of a single Passover celebration. The
greatest proportion of these were not brought up from the country
by the offerers, but were purchased on their arrival at Jerusalem.
An extensive traffic, yielding no inconsiderable gain to those engaged
in it, was thus created. Some open area for conducting it was need-
ed. The heads of the priesthood, to whom the custody- of the temple
was committed, saw that good rents were got for any suitable mar-
ket-ground which the city could supply. They were tempted to fill
their own coffers from this source. Jerusalem could furnish no place
so suitable for the exposure of the animals as the Court of the Gen-
tiles. "What more convenient than that the victims should be pur-
chased in the very neighborhood of the place where they were to be
offered up ? The greed of gain prevailed over all care for the sanc-
tity of the temple. The Court of the Gentiles was let out to the cat-
tle-dealers, and a large amount was thus added to the yearly revenue
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE. 125
of the temple. Still another source of gain lay open, and was taken
advantage of. Every one who came up to the Passover, and desired
to take part in the festival, had to present a half-shekel of Jewish
money to the priests. This kind of money was not now in general
use; it was scarce even in Judea, unknown beyond that land. Noth-
ing, however, but the half-shekel of the sanctuary would be taken at
the temple. To supply themselves with the needed coin, visitors had
to go to the money-changer. And where can he find a fitter place
to erect his booth and set out his table than within the very area in
which the larger traffic was going on ? He offers so much to the
priesthood to be permitted to do so; the bribe is taken, and the
booth and the tables are erected. And so, amid a perfect Babel of
tongues, and thronging, jostling crowds of men and beasts, the buy-
ing and the selling and the money-changing are all going on.
Into the heart of this tumultuous throng Jesus enters. Of the
many hundreds there, few have ever seen him before; few know
anything about him, either about his baptism in the Jordan or his
late miracle at Cana. He appears as a stranger, a young man clad in
the simple garb of a Galilean peasant, without any badge of author
ity in his hand. He looks around with an eye of indignant sorrow,
pours out the changers' money, overthrows their tables, forming a
scourge of small cords drives the herds of cattle before him, and,
mingling consideration with his zeal, says to them who sold the
doves, " Take these things hence ; make not my Father's house a
house of merchandise." Why is it that at the touch of this slender
scourge, and the bidding of this youthful stranger, buyers and sellers
stop their traffic, the money-changers suffer their money to be rudely
handled and their tables to be overturned? The slightest resist-
ance of so many against one would have been sufficient to arrest
the movement. But no such resistance is attempted, no opposition
is made, by men not likely from their occupation to be remarkable
for mildness of disposition or pliability of character. How are we to
explain this? "We can understand how, at the last Passover, at the
close of his ministry, when Jesus, then so well known, so generally
recognised by the people as a prophet, repeated this cleansing of the
temple, there should have been a yielding to his authoritative com-
mand. But what are we to say of such an occurrence taking place
at the very commencement of his ministry, his first public act in
Jerusalem ? It is a mysterious power which some men, in time of
excitement, by look and word and tone of command, can exercise
over their fellow-men. But grant that rare power in its highest
degree to Jesus, it will scarce account for this scene in the court
126 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
of the Gentiles at Jerusalem. It would seem as if, in eye and voice
and action, the divine power and authority that lay in Jesus broke
forth into visible manifestation, and laid suck a spell upon those
rough cattle-drivers and those cold calculators of the money-tables,
that all power of resistance was for the time subdued. It would
seem as if it pleased him to exert here within the temple the same
influence t>at he did afterwards in the garden, when he stepped forth
from the darkness into the full moonlight, and said to the rough
band that advanced with lanterns and swords and staves to take
bim, " I that speak unto you am he ;" and when at the sight and
word they reeled backward and fell to the ground. The effect in
both cases was but temporary. High priests and officers were soon
upon their feet again; and, wondering at their own weakness in
yielding to a power which at the moment they were impotent to
resist, proceeded to lay hold upon Jesus and lead him away unto
Caiaphas. ' So was it also, we believe, in the temple court. A sud-
den, mysterious, irresistible power is upon that crowd. They yield,
they know not why. But by-and-by the spell would seem to be
withdrawn. They soon recover from its effect. Nor is it long till,
wondering at their having allowed a single man, and one who had
no right whatever, to interfere with arrangements made by the chief
authorities, and to lord it over them, they return, resume their occu-
pations, and all goes on as before.
It was with no intention or expectation of putting an end in this
way to the desecration of the holy place that Jesus acted. What,
then, was the purpose of his act? It was meant to be a public
proclamation of his Sonship to God : an open assertion and exercise
of his authority as sustaining this relation ; a protest in his Father's
name against the conduct of the priesthood in permitting this dese-
cration of the holy place. It was far more for the priesthood than
for the crowd in the market-place that it was meant. They were
not ignorant that the chief object of the ministry of the Baptist, with
which the whole country was ringing, was to announce the imme-
diate coming of the Messiah. They had not long before sent a depu-
tation to the banks of the Jordan to ask John whether he himself
were not the Messiah whose near advent he was foretelling. The
members of that deputation heard of the baptism of Jesus ; in all
likelihood they had not left the place when Jesus came back from
the temptation in the wilderness, and was publicly pointed to by
John as the greater than himself who was to come after him, the
Lamb of God, the Son of God. From the lips of the men whom
they had sent, or from the lips of others, they must have known all
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE. 127
about what had happened. And now here among them is this Jesus
of Nazareth ; here he is come up to the temple, speaking and acting
as if it were his part and office authoritatively to interpose and
cleanse the building of all its defilements. What else could the
priesthood who had charge of the temple understand than that
here was claimed a jurisdiction in regard to it superior to their
own ? What else could they understand when the words were heard,
or were repeated to them, " Make not my Father's house a house of
merchandise," than that here was one who claimed a relationship to
God as his Father, and a right over the temple as his Father's house,
which none but One could claim ? They go to him, therefore, or they
call him before them, and entering, you will remark, into no justifica-
tion of their own deed in hiring out the temple court as they had
done — entering into no argument with him as to the rightness or
wrongness of what he had done, rather admitting that if he were
indeed a prophet, as his acts showed that he at least pretended to
be, his act was justifiable ; they proceed upon the assumption that
he was bound to give to them some proof of his carrying a Divine
commission, and they say to him, "What sign showest thou unto
us, seeing thou doest these things ?"
He had shown a good enough sign already, had they read it aright.
He was about to show signs numerous and significant enough in the
days that immediately succeeded; but to such a haughty challenge
as this, coming, as he knew, from men whom no sign would convince
of his Messiahship, he had but this reply: "Destroy this temple, and
in three days I will raise it up." A truly dark saying; one that, not
only they did not and could not at the time understand, but that they
were almost certain to misunderstand, and, misunderstanding, to
turn against the speaker, as if he meant to claim the possession of a
power which he never could be called upon to exercise. Then said
the Jews, interpreting, as they could scarce fail to do, his words as
applicable to the material temple: " Forty-and-six years has this
temple been in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three davs?"*
Jesus made no attempt to rectify the error into which his ques-
* It is curious that, in saying so, they have left So us one of the few fixed and
certain data upon which we can determine the year when the public ministry of
our Lord began. We know that the building, or rather rebuilding of the tem-
ple, was commenced by Herod in the eighteenth year of his reign ; that is — speak-
ing according to the Eoman method of counting their years, from the foundation
of Rome — during the year that began in the spring of 731, and ended in that of
735. Forty-six years from this would bring us to the year 7S0-781. Historical
Btatements and astronomical calculations conspire to prove that it must have been
128 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
tioners had fallen. He could not well have done so without a pro-
mature disclosure of his death and resurrection, a thing that he care-
fully avoided till the time of their accomplishment drew near. He
left this mysterious saying to be interpreted against himself. Ii
seems to have taken a deep hold, to have been widely circulated,
and to have fixed itself very deeply in the memory of the people.
Three years afterwards, when they were trying to convict him of
some crime in reference to religion, this first saying of his was brought
up against him, as one uttered blasphemously against the temple ; but
the two witnesses could not agree about the words. And when the
cross was raised, those who passed by railed on him, saying, "Ah,
thou that destroyest the temple, and buildest it in three days, save
thyself." Whatever differences there were in the remembrances and
reports of the people, in one thing they agreed, in the attributing the
destruction of the temple that Jesus had spoken of here, to himself.
But he had not spoken of the destruction as effected by his own
hands, but by those of the Jews themselves. And he had not had in
his eye the material temple on Mount Moriah, but the temple of his
body, which they were to destroy, and which he, three days after-
wards, was to raise from the dead. AH 'this became plain afterwards,
and went, when his real meaning stood revealed in the event, migh-
tily to confirm the faith of his followers. And in one respect it may
still go to confirm ours, for does not that saying of Jesus, uttered so
early — his first word, we may say, to the leaders of the people at
Jerusalem — does it not, along with so many other like evidences, go
to prove how clearly the Lord saw the end from the beginning?
The temple at Jerusalem has long been in ruins. In its stead
there stands now before us the church of the body of Christ, the soci-
ety of the faithful. In her corporate capacity, in her corporate act-
ings, has the church not acted over again what the Jews did with
their temple, when she has made merchandise of her offices and her
revenues, and sold them to the highest bidder, as you would sell oxen
in the market or meat in the shambles? The spirit which promptF
such open sacrilegious acts, such gross making gain of godliness, is
the self-same spirit which our Lord rebuked; and how often does it
creep into and take hold and spread like a defiling leprosy over the
house of God! It does so in the pulpit, whenever self, in one or
other of its insidious forms, frames the speech and animates the
between the 13th March and the 4th April, in the year 750, that Herod died. If
Christ were born a few months before that death, thirty years forward from that
time brings us to the year 780, as that in which our Lord's ministry commenced ;
the two independent computations thus singularly confirming one another
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE 129
utterance ; it does so in the pew, when in the hour hallowed to prayer
and praise the chambers of thought and imagery within are crowded
with worldly guests. Know ye not, brethren, that ye are the temple
of God ; and that the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are ?
Would that half the zeal the Saviour showed in cleansing the earthlj
building were but shown by each of us in the purifying and cleansing
of our hearts! Truly it is no easy task to drive out thence every
thing that defileth in his sight, to keep out as well as to put out ; for,
quick as were those buyers and sellers of old in coming back to their
places in the temple and resuming their occupations there, quicker
still are those vain and sinful desires, dispositions, imaginations,
which in our moments of excited zeal we have expelled from our
hearts, in returning to their old and well-loved haunts. The Lord of
the temple must come himself to cleanse it ; come, not once or twice
as in the case of the temple at Jerusalem; come, not as a transient
visitor, but as an abiding guest ; not otherwise than by his own in-
dwelling shall these unhallowed inmates be ejected and kept without,
and the house made worthy of Him who deigns to occupy it.
129a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
Some of the most remarkable disclosures of truth were made by
Christ in conversation with individuals. Especially are these per-
sonal interviews given by John in the Fourth Gospel, in which the
two that compose the present Study are found. And what a contrast
do they present!
One was in Jerusalem, where the official and acccredited leaders
of Jewish life rested in a proud sense of sanctity and exclusiveness.
The other was in the midst of Samaria, the region counted by these
officials outlawed and accursed. The one was with a member of the
Sanhedrim; the other with a woman upon whom a Jewish rabbi was
not to look, still less with whom he was to talk. But our Lord made
no distinction in his outreach toward both of these souls; and because
both as he went on with them proved hungry for the truth, he opened
to each his illimitable store of heavenly instruction.
It would appear that each of these individual souls occupied a key
position, and therefore Christ could depart from the reserve which
he showed through the early and middle period of his work as respects
the utterance of his deepest truths. Nicodemus was fitted by his
position asa " master in Israel " to have made known to him some of
the fundamental principles of the completed divine plan of salvation;
yet by his nature and relations he would not be inclined to seek to
spread these forth prematurely. So Christ opened to him the great
truth of the new birth, of the agency of the Holy Spirit, of the saving-
work of the Son, of the redeeming love of the Father. Likewise, our
Lord's conversation with the woman of Samaria was his first spiritual
contact with a soul outside the circle of the chosen people, and it is
not strange that it stirred the heart of the Saviour profoundly, ani
that, finding her like Nicodemus religiously receptive he imparted to
her the profound principle of the spirituality of God and of worship,
and revealed himself as the one able to satisfy the innermost needs of
her life.
PART I. PREPARATION AND EARLY MINISTRY.
Study 4. Two Wonderful Interviews.
(1) Christ and Nicodemus 1296-138
o. Unrecorded miracles at Jerusalem 1296
b. They develop in most of those who witness them only a sur-
face faith 1296
c. But Nicodemus comes acknowledging that these miracles
show that Christ is from God 130, 131
THE CONVERSATION WITH NICODEMUS 1296
d. Christ affirms the necessity of the new birth 132, 133
e. He shows that this work of the Spirit is mysterious 134
/. Yet that he as the Son of God has full knowledge of these
transcendent things 135
g. He declares the substance of his gospel of salvation 135, 136
h. The truth he imparts falls into soil which produces a late
but genuine harvest, and Nicodemus in the end is a true
disciple 136-138
(2) Christ and the woman of Samaria 138-149
a. Christ's public ministry has opened in Jerusalem and Judea. . 138, 139
6. His ministry through baptism is being contrasted with
John's 139-141
c. Christ deems it best to retire from Judea 141
d. On his way to Galilee he passes through Samaria 141, 142
e. Resting by Jacob's well, he says to a Samaritan woman,
"Give me to drink" 143
/. It leads into a conversation in which he reveals to her some
of the highest spiritual truths 143-147
g. He tarries for two days to minister to the Samaritans 147, 1 48
h. Wherever there is thirst he is ready to satisfy it 148, 149
XIII.
The Conversation with Nicodemus*
Cheist's first visit to Jerusalem, after his baptism, appears to
have been a brief one : not longer, perhaps, than that usually paid by
those who went up to the Passover. Besides the cleansing of the
temple he wrought some miracles which are left unrecorded, but
which we may believe were of the same kind as his subsequent
ones, and these were generally miracles of healing. Many believed
on him when they saw those miracles performed ; believed on him as
a wonder-worker, as a man who had the great power of God at his
command; but their faith scarcely went farther, involved in it little
or no recognition of his true character and office. Although they
believed in him, Jesus did not believe in them (for it is the same
word which is used in the two cases.) Knowing what was in them,
as he knew what was in all men, undeceived by appearance or pro-
fession, he entered into no close or friendly relations with them ; made
no hasty or premature discovery of himself.
But there was one man to whom he did commit himself on the
occasion of this first and short residence in Jerusalem, to whom he
•John 3: 1-21.
130 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
did make such a discovery of fcimself, as we shall presently see he
never made to any other single person in the whole course of his
ministry. This was a man of the Pharisees, one of the sect that
became the most bitter persecutors of Christ ; a ruler too of the Jews, a
man well educated, of good position, and in high office ; a member of
the Sanhedrim. He was one of the body that not long ago had sent the
deputation down to the Jordan to inquire about the Baptist. He knew
all about John's ministry, about his announcing that the kingdom of God
was at hand, that there was One coming after him who was to baptize
not with water but with the Holy Ghost. He had been wondering
what this ministry of John could mean, when Jesus appeared in the
city, cleansed the temple, wrought those miracles. He saw that
among the class to which he belonged, the appearance and acts of
the young Nazarene, who had assumed and exercised such an author-
ity within the courts of the temple, and when challenged had given
such an unsatisfactory reply, had excited nothing but distrust and
antipathy; a distrust and antipathy, however, in which he did not,
could not share. He could not concur with those who spake of him
as an ignorant rustic, a mere blind zealot, whom a fit of fanaticism
had driven to do what he did in the temple ; still less could he agree
with those who spake of him as an impostor, a deceiver of the people.
We do not know what words of Christ's he heard, what acts of his
he witnessed; but the impression had come upon him, whencesoever
it came, that he was altogether different from what his fellow-rulers
were disposed to believe. Could this indeed be the man of whom
John spake so much ; could this be indeed the Christ, the Messiah
for whom so many were longing? If he was, what new and higher
truths would he unfold, what a glorious kingdom would he usher in !
Restless and unsatisfied with things as they were, all his Pharisaic
strictness in the keeping of the law having failed to quiet his con-
science and give comfort to his heart, Nicodemus was looking about
and longing for further light. Perhaps this stranger, who was come
to Jerusalem, may be able to help him. He may be poor and mean,
a Galilean by birth, without official rank or authority; but what of
that, if he be really what he seems, one clothed with a divine com-
mission ; what of that, if he can quench in any way this thirst of
heart and soul which burns within? If He could be seen by him
alone, Jesus would surely lay aside that reserve which he appeared to
maintain, and instruct him fully as to the mysteries of the coming
kingdom. But how should such a private interview be brought
about? He might send for Him; and sent for by one in his position,
Jesus might not refuse to come. But then it would be noisel abroad
THE CONVERSATION WITH NICODEMUS. 131
that he had been entertaining the Nazarene in his dwelling. Or he
might go to Him when He was teaching in public, but then it would
be seen and known of all men that he had paid Him an open mark of
respect. He was not prepared to face either of these alternatives ; he
was too timid, thought too much of what his companions and friends
and the general public of the city might think or say. Yet he is too
eager to throw the chance away. He must see Jesus, and as his fears
keep him from going to or sending for him by day, he goes by night,
breaks in upon his retirement, asks and obtains the audience.
There was something wrong, no doubt, in his choosing such a
time and way for the interview. It would have been a manlier, more
heroic thing for him to have braved all danger, and risen above all
fear of man. But whatever blame we may choose on this ground to
attach to Nicodemus, let it not obscure our perception of his obvious
honesty and earnestness, his intense desire for further enlightenment,
his willingness to receive instruction. He came by night, but he was
the only one of his order who came at all. He came by night, but
it was not to gratify an idle curiosity, but in the disquiet of a half-
awakened conscience to seek for peace. "Rabbi," he says, as soon as
he finds himself in Christ's presence. He salutes him with all respect.
The Rabbis of the temple would have scorned the claim of one so
young in years, unknown in any of their schools, who had given no
proof of his acquaintance with their laws and their traditions — to be
regarded as one of them. But the ruler, in all likelihood by many
years Christ's senior, and one who on other grounds might have
counted on being the saluted rather than the saluter, does not hesi-
tate to address him thus: "Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher
come from God : for no man can do these miracles that thou doest
except God be with him." He shows at once his respect, his candor,
his intelligence, and his faith. He does not doubt that these are
real miracles which Jesus has been working; he is ready to trace to
its true source the power employed in their accomplishment ; he is
prepared at once to acknowledge that the worker of such miracles
must be one sent and sanctioned by God. In saying so, he knows
that he is saying more than perhaps any other man of his station in
Jerusalem would be ready to say. He thinks that he says enough to
win for himself a favorable reception. Yet, he is speaking far below
the truth, much under his own half-formed conceptions and beliefs.
It is but as a teacher, not as a prophet, much less the great Prophet,
fchat he addresses Jesus.
One might have expected that, having addressed him as such, he
would go on to put the questions to which he presumed that such a
132 THE LIFE OF CHRIS!
teacher could give replies. But lie pauses, perhaps imagining that,
gratified by such a visit, pleased at being saluted thus by one of the
rulers, Jesus will salute him in return, and save him the trouble of
inquiry by making some disclosures of the new doctrine which, as a
teacher sent from God, he had come to teach; or by telling him
something more about that new kingdom which so many were
expecting to see set up. How surprised he must have been when so
abruptly, yet so solemnly, without exchange of salutation or word of
preface, Jesus says, " Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a man be
born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." Such a man as
Nicodemus could scarcely have been so stupid as to believe that in
speaking of being born again, Jesus meant a second birth of the
body. He is so disconcerted, however, disappointed, perplexed,
besides being perhaps a little irritated, by both the manner and the
substance of the grave, emphatic utterance — one which, however
general in its terms, was obviously spoken with a direct and personal
reference — that, in his confusion, he seizes upon the expression as the
only one that had as yet conveyed any definite idea to his mind — as
affording him some ground of exception, some material for reply; and
taking it in its literal sense, he says : " How can a man be born again
when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother's
womb, and be born?" The wise and gentle teacher in whose hands
he now is, takes no notice of the folly or the petulance of the remark.
He reiterates what he had said, modifying, however, his expressions,
so that Nicodemus could not fail to see of what kind of second birth
it was that he was speaking: "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except
a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the
kingdom of God."
Had Nicodemus only had time at first to collect his thoughts, he
would have remembered that it was no new term, framed now for the
first time, that Jesus had been employing in speaking of a second
birth; it being a proverbial expression with his countrymen with
reference to those who became proselytes to the Jewish faith, and
were admitted as such into the Jewish community, that they were as
men new born. The outward mode of admitting such proselytes to
the enjoyment of Jewish privileges was by baptism, by washing with
water. John had adopted this rite, and by demanding that all Jews
should be baptized with the baptism of repentance, as a preparation
on their part for the coming of the kingdom, he had in fact, already
proclaimed, that, as every heathen man became as a new man on
entering into the commonwealth of Israel, so every Jewish man
must become a new man before entering into that new kingdom which
THE CONVERSATION WITH NICODEMUS. 133
I lie Messiah was to introduce and establish. It was virtually to
symbolize the importance and necessity of repentance — that change
of mind and heart which formed the burden of his preaching, as a
qualification in all candidates for admission into the kingdom — that
John came baptizing with water. But he took great pains to inform
his hearers that, while he baptized with water, there was One coming
immediately who was to baptize with the. Holy Ghost. Was it likely
then, or we may even say was it possible that, when Nicodemus now
heard Jesus say, " Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit,
he cannot enter into the kingdom of God," he could fail to perceive
the allusion to the water-baptism of John and the Spirit-baptism of
the Messiah? In common with all his countrymen, Nicodemus had
assumed that, be it what it might, come how or when it might, the
Messianic kingdom would be one within which their very birth as
Jews would entitle them to be ranked. This popular delusion John
had already, by his baptism and his teaching, done something to rec-
tify. The full truth it was reserved for Jesus to proclaim, and he
does it now to Nicodemus. This master in Israel has come to Jesus
to be taught ; let him know then that it is not a new doctrine, but
a new life which Jesus has come to proclaim and to impart. It is not
by knowing so much, or believing in such truths, or practising such
duties, that a man is to qualify himself for becoming a subject of the
spiritual kingdom of Jesus Christ. First of all, as a necessary pre-
liminary, he must be born again; born of the Spirit, have spiritual
life imparted, before he can see so as to apprehend its real nature,
before he can enter so as to partake of its true privileges, the king-
dom of God. This kingdom is not an outward or a national one, not
the kingdom of a creed, or of an external organized community. It
is a kingdom exclusively of the new-born — of those who have been
begotten of the Spirit — of those who have been born again, not of
blood, nor of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. For that
which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit
is spirit.
A mystic thing it looks to Nicodemus, this second birth — this birth
of the Spirit ; secret, invisible, impalpable ; its origin and issues hid-
den, remote. "Marvel not," says Jesus, at its mysteriousness. The
night is quiet around you, not a sound of bending branch or rustling
leaf comes from the neighboring wood ; but now the air is stirred as
by an invisible hand ; the sigh of the night breeze comes through the
bending branches and rustling leaves ; you hear the sound ; but who
can take you to that breeze's birthplace, and show you where and
how it was begotten ; who can carry you to its place of sepulture, and
134 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
sliow you where and how it dies ? Not that the wind — the air in
motion — is a whit more wilful or capricious, or less obedient to fixed
laws than any other elements, or is chosen upon that account to rep-
resent the operations of God's Spirit on the souls of men. All its
movements are fixed and orderly; but as the movements of an invis-
ible agent, they elude our observation ; nor, if you sought for a mate-
rial emblem of that hiddenness with which the Holy Spirit works,
could you find in the whole creation one more apt than that which
Jesus used, when he said to Nicodemus, "The wind bloweth where it
listeth, and thou nearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence
it cometh and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the
Spirit."
Already a dim apprehension of that for which he was being appre-
hended of Christ has begun to dawn upon Nicodemus. He receives
the truth as affirmed by Jesus as to the necessity of the new birth.
He begins even to understand something as to its nature. Yet a
haze still hangs over it. He wonders and he doubts — giving expres-
sion to his feelings in the question, " How can these things be?"
If Christ's answer may be taken as the best interpretation of this
question, Nicodemus was now troubling himself not so much either
with the nature or the necessity of the new birth, as with the manner
of its accomplishment ; the kind of instrumentahty by which so great
an inward change was to be effected; for, read aright, our Lord's
reply is not only a description of that instrumentahty, but an actual
employment of it. First, however, a gentle rebuke must be given:
'Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things? Hast
thou forgotten all that is written in the book of the law and in the
prophets about the coming of those days in which the Lord would
pour out his Spirit upon all flesh ; about the new covenant that the
Lord would then enter into with his people, one of whose two great
provisions was to be this : " I will give them one heart, and I will put
a uew spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their
flesh, and will give them a heart of flesh " '? Ezek. 11 : 19. What
had so often and so long beforehand been thus spoken of was now
about to be executed. The Spirit of God was waiting to do his gra-
cious work, in begetting many sons and daughters to the Lord. Let
Nicodemus be assured of this, on the testimony of one whose knowl-
edge of the spirit- world was immediate and complete. He had spo-
ken very confidently about his knowledge, of Jesus. " We know," he
had said, " thou art a teacher sent from God." Let him listen now
to words of equal confidence, which no mere human teacher, though
he were even sent by God, could well, upon such a subject, have
THE CONVERSATION WITH NICODEMUS. 135
employed: "Verily, verily I say unto thee, We speak that we do
know, and testify that we have seen ; and ye receive not our witness."
' This work of the Spirit in regenerating is connected with another—
my own — in redeeming. The one is but an earthly operation; a
work performed within men's souls ; but the other, how high have you
to rise to trace it to its source ; how far to go to follow it to its
issues ? " If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how
shall ye believe if I tell you of heavenly things?"
'And yet who can speak of these heavenly things as I can do?
You take me, Nicodemus, to be a teacher sent from God, perhaps
you might even acknowledge me as a prophet; but know me that I
am no other than He, the Son of man, the Son of God, coming down
from heaven, ascending to heaven, but leaving not heaven behind me
in my descent, bringing it along with me ; while here" on earth, being
still in heaven. No man, I say unto thee, hath ascended up to
heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man
which is in heaven.'
And having thus proclaimed the ground and certainty of his
knowledge of all the earthly and all the heavenly things pertaining
to the kingdom, Jesus goes on to preach his own gospel beforehand
to Nicodemus, taking the lifting up of the serpent in the wilderness
as the type to illustrate his own approaching lifting up on the cross,
declaring this to be the great and gracious design of his death, that
whosoever believeth in him might not perish, but have eternal life :
" For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son ;
that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlast-
ing life."
It does not fall within our scope to illustrate at large or attempt
to enforce the great truths about the one and only manner of enter-
ing into Christ's spiritual kingdom ; about the universal need of the
Spirit-birth in order to make this entrance ; about his own character
and office; the manner and objects of his death; the faith which,
trusting to him, brings with it everlasting life ; the moral guilt that
lies in the act of rejecting him as a Redeemer; the true character of
those tempers of mind and heart which prompt to faith on the one
side and to unbelief on the other, which are all brought out in th«
discourse of our Lord to Nicodemus. But it does fall precisely with-
in our present design that I ask you to reflect a moment or two —
arst, upon the time at which this discourse was delivered; and next,
as to itb effect upon him to whom it was addressed.
It was delivered weeks or months before the Sermon on the
Mount, or any other of Christ's public addresses to the people
136 THE LIFE OF OHKIST.
Standing in time the first, it stands in character alone. You search
in vain through all the subsequent discourses of our Lord for any
such clear, compendious, comprehensive development of the Christian
salvation: of its source in the love of the Father; its channel in the
death of his only begotten Son ; and of the great Agent by whom it
;s appropriated and applied. You search in vain for any other
instance in which the three persons of the Trinity were spoken of by
our Lord consecutively and conjunctly; to each being assigned his
proper part in the economy of our redemption. It may even be
doubted whether, in the whole range of the apostolic epistles, there
be a passage of equal length in which the manner of our salvation
through Christ is as fully and distinctly described.
Delivered thus at the very beginning of our Lord's ministry, it
utters a loud and unambiguous protest against the error of those
who would have us to believe that there was a decided and essential
difference between the earlier and later teachings of our Saviour ;
between the doctrine taught by Christ and that taught afterwards by
his apostles. It is quite true that, until within a few months of the
final decease accomplished at Jerusalem, our Lord studiously avoided
all reference to his death. - It is quite true that, in not a single
instance — not even where one would most naturally have expected
it — in the prayer that he taught to his disciples — is there an allusion
by Jesus to that death, as supplying the ground of our forgiveness.
But that this marked silence is misinterpreted, when it is inferred
that he did not assign to it that place and importance given to it
afterwards, we have here, in this discourse to Nicodeinus, the most
convincing proof. I shall have occasion hereafter to refer to those
considerations by which our Saviour was obviously influenced during
the course of his personal ministry in not publicly unfolding the doc-
trine of the cross. Let those, however, who delight to dwell on the
simple and pure morality of the Sermon on the Mount, and to con-
trast it with the doctrinal theology of the apostles, declaring their
preference for the teachings of the Master above that of his disci-
ples, but ponder well this first of all our Lord's discourses, and they
will see that instead of any conflict there is a perfect harmony.
But if he never afterwards unfolded his gospel so plainly or so
fully, why did he do so now ? why reveal so much to Nicodeinus thai
he appears to have withheld from the multitude ? Am I wrong ia
regarding this as due in part to the very circumstance that this wag
a nocturnal and a solitary interview with Nicodemus ? No one but
this ruler of the Jews may have heard the words that Jesus spake
that night, and he would be the last man to go and repeat them to
THE CONVERSATION WITH NIOODEMUS. 137
others. There is good reason to believe that the Gospel of St. John
was written and published some years after those of the other evan-
gelists. It is in the Gospel of St. John alone that the interview with
Nicodemus is recorded. The other evangelists appear to have been
ignorant of it. How the beloved disciple came to his knowledge of
it it is not necessary for us to inquire. He may have received it
from the lips of Nicodemus himself. Enough for us to know that it
was not currently reported in the church till St. John gave it circula-
tion. At any rate, we may be sure that it remained unknown all
through the period of our Lord's own life. It was not, then, in vio-
lation of the rule that he acted on afterwards that he spoke now so
plainly and iully as he did to Nicodemus. It was a rare opportunity,
one that never perhaps returned, to have before him one so qualified
by capacity, by acquirement, by honesty, by earnestness, to receive
the truth; and the very manner in which the Saviour hastened to
reveal it is ( o us the proof that he saw good soil here into which to
cast the seed, and the proof too how grateful to him the office of his
hand in sowing it.
He knew, indeed, that the seed then sown was long to be dor-
mant. For three years there was no token of its germination. Nic-
odemus never sought a second interview with Jesus, but kept studi-
ously aloof. Once, indeed, and it is the only sight throughout three
years that we get of him, he ventured to say a word in the Council
against a hasty arrest and condemnation of Jesus, but he met with
such a sharp rebuff that he never opened his lips again. The mem-
orable words, however, of the midnight meeting at Jerusalem had not
been forgotten. There was much in them that he could not under-
stand. Who was He who had spoken of himself as the Son of man,
the Son of God? of his ascending and descending to and from heaven?
of being in heaven even when he stood there on earth ? He had spo-
ken of his being lifted up, that men might believe in him, and believ-
ing, might not perish, but have everlasting life. What could that
lifting up of Jesus be, and how upon it could there hang such issues?
Much to perplex here, yet much to stimulate ; for that life, that eter-
nal life, of which Christ had spoken, was the very life that above all
things he was longing to possess and realize. In this troubled state
of mind and heart, with what an anxious eye would Nicodemus watch
the after-current of our Lord's history! For a year and a half be
had disappeared from Judea; was heard of only as saying and doing
wonders down in Galilee. Then came the final visit to the capital,
the great commotion in the temple, the raising of Lazarus, the seizure,
the trial, the condemnation. Was Nicodemus present with the rest
138 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
of the Council of which he was a member, on the morning of the
crucifixion ? If he was, he must ingloriously have kept silence, for
the vote was unanimous. I would rather believe, from what hap-
pened on the after part of the day, that he was not present; did not
)bey the hasty summons. With him or without him, the verdict is
given. The license to crucify is extorted from the vacillating gov-
ernor ; the cross is raised. At last the words that three years before
had sounded in the ruler's listening ear, and which had since been
frequently recalled, the mystery of their meaning unrevealed, are
verified and explained. The cross is raised ; Jesus is lifted up. The
darkened heavens, the reeling earth, the prayer for his crucifiers, the
promise to the penitent who dies beside him, the voice of triumph at
the close proclaim the death of that only begotten Son of God whom
he had given to be the Saviour of the world. The scales drop off
from the eyes they so long had covered. Fear goes out, and faith
comes into Nicodemus' breast, a faith that plants him by Joseph's
side in the garden, and unites their hands in the rendering of the last
services to the body, which they buried in the new sepulchre.
What a flood of light fell then on the hitherto mysterious words
of the Crucified ; what a rich treasure of comfort would the medita-
tion of them unfold all his life long afterwards to Nicodemus ; and
what an honor to him that he was chosen as the man to whom were
first addressed those words which have comforted so many millions
since, and are destined to comfort so many millions more in the years
that are to come : " God so loved the world, that he gave his only
begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but
have everlasting life."
XIV.
The Woman of Samaria*
CoMma, as he did, to a community that had long been accus-
tomed to act in its corporate capacity as a nation in covenant with
God ; coming to be nationally received or nationally rejected as the
Messiah ; a reception or rejection which could only be embodied in
some decisive expression of the will of the nation, made through its
authorized heads and representatives — our natural expectation is that
Christ's public manifestation of himself would be made principally in
Judea and at Jerusalem. And the actual opening of his public mini*
* John 4.
THE WOMAN OF SAMARIA. 139
try convinces us that had no check or hindrance been interposed, had
any readiness been shown by the rulers of the people to look favor-
ably on his character and claims, Judea and Jerusalem would have
been the chief scene of his labors. For before he opened his lips, as
a teacher sent from God, to any Galilean audience, or in any provin-
cial synagogue, he presented himself in the capital, and by a bold
and striking act, fitted to draw all eyes upon him, asserted his author-
ity within the temple, as the house of his Father, which it became him
to cleanse. The bold beginning was well sustained by both word
and deed, but no favorable impression was made. The only one of
the rulers who made any approach came to him by night, and went
away to lock up deep within his breast the wonderful revelation that
was made to him. Jesus retired from Jerusalem, but lingered still
in Judea, spending the summer months which succeeded the Pass-
over in some district of the country, not far from that in which John
was baptizing.* It seems strange to us that after the sign from
heaven had been given that the greater than he had appeared, in-
stead of joining himself to Jesus, as one of his disciples, John should
have kept aloof, and continued baptizing, preserving thus a separate
following of his own. And it seems equally strange, that now for a
short time, and for this short time only, our Lord's disciples— the
men who had voluntarily attached themselves to him, none of whom
had as yet been separated from their earthly callings, or set apart as
those through whom a new order of things was to be instituted —
should also have engaged in baptizing, if not at the suggestion, yet
by the permission and under the sanction of their Master. What-
ever reasons we may assign for the separate baptisms of John and
Jesus being for this short season contemporaneously sustained, they
serve to bring out fully and in striking contrast the character and
disposition towards Jesus of the Pharisees on the one hand and of
the Baptist on the other. At first, in Judea as in Galilee, the com-
mon people heard Christ gladly, and came in great numbers to be
baptized. This for the Pharisees is a new matter of offence, out of
which, however, they construct an implement of mischief, which
they hasten to employ. There can be little doubt that the question
which arose between John's disciples and the Jews was stirred by
the latter, had respect to the relative value of the two baptisms, and
was intended to sow the seeds of dissension between the two disci-
* As yet all attempts have failed to identify the .ZEnon near Salim, to which
from the banks of the Jordan John had now removed. It will, in all probability,
be discovered somewhere northeast of Jerusalem, so situated that the way from
it into Galilee lay naturally through Samaria.
140 THE LIFE OF OHK1ST.
pleships. Fresh from the dispute, and heated by it, some of John's
disciples came to him, and said unto him, evidently with the tone of
men complaining of a grievance by which their feelings had been
hurt : " Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou
barest witness, behold, the same baptizeth, and all men come to him."
"We may be all ready enough to acknowledge the superiority of
another to ourselves in regard to qualities or acts in which we never
sought for prominence or praise. Even as to those qualities and
acts in which we may have ourselves excelled, we may not be un-
willing to confess the superiority of another, provided that we do
not come into direct comparison with him, in presence of those who
embody the expression of their preference in some marked piece of
conduct. But it does subject our weak nature to an extreme trial
when, by one's side, in the very region in which he has attained ex-
traordinary and unlooked-for success, he sees another rise whose
success so far outstrips his own as to throw it wholly into the shade.
Remember, now, that the Baptist was but a man, with all the com-
mon infirmities of our nature clinging to him ; that up to the time he
had baptized Jesus, his course had been one of unparalleled popu-
larity ; that from that time the tide of the popular favor began to ebb
away from him, and to rise around this other, till at last he hears
the tidings, He baptizeth, and all men now go to him. And then,
listen to his answer to the complaint of his disciples : " A man," he
said, " can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven."
' This growing baptism of Jesus, this lesser baptism of mine, are both
as Heaven has willed. The multitudes that once flocked to me were
sent by God ; the power which I had over them I got from God ; and
if the Lord who sent and gave is pleased now to withdraw them from
me, to bestow them upon another, still will I adore his name. Nor
is it bare submission to his will I cherish. I hear of, and I rejoice at
the success of Christ. " Ye yourselves bear me witness, that I said,
I am not the Christ, but that I am sent before him. He that hath
the bride is the bridegroom : but the friend of the bridegroom, which
standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly, because of the bride-
groom's voice. This my joy therefore is fulfilled. He must increase,
but I must decrease." ' Rare and beautiful instance of an unen vying
humility; all the rarer and more beautiful as occurring not in one of
weak and gentle nature, but in a character of masculine energy, in
which are often to be found only the stronger passions of humanity.
A rare and beautiful sight it is to see the gentle Jonathan not only
give way to David> as successor to his father's kingdom, but content
to stand by David's side and live under the shadow of his throne ;
THE WOMAN OF SAMARIA. HI
but a rarer, I believe, arid still more beautiful thing it is to see the
strong-willed Baptist not only make room for Jesus, but rejoice
that his own light, which had "shone out so brilliantly, enlightening
for a season the whole Jewish heavens, faded away and sunk out o(
sight in the beams of the rising Sun of righteousness." And John's
final testimony upon this occasion to the character and office of Jesus
is as striking as the involuntary display that he makes of his own
character, going much beyond what he had said before, and contain-
ing much that bears a singular likeness to what Jesus had shortly
before said of himself to Nicodemus : " He that cometh from above
is above all ; he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the
earth ; he that cometh from heaven is above all : and what he hath
seen and heard, that he testifieth; and no man receiveth his testi-
mony. He that hath received his testimony hath set to his seal that
God is true. For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of
God : for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him. The
Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into his hand. He
that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life : and he that belie\eth
not the Son shall not see life ; but the wrath of God abideth on
him." John 3: 31-36.
Such was the testimony elicited from John on being told of the
large concourse of people which had gathered round Jesus and his
disciples. "Very different was the effect which this intelligence pro-
duced in Jerusalem. It fanned the hostile feeling already kindled in
the breasts of the Pharisees. How that feeling might have mani-
fested itself had Jesus continued in Judea, his disciples gone on bap-
tizing, and the people kept flocking to them, we cannot tell. As from
one quarter there burst about this time on the head of John the storm
that closed his public career, so from another quarter might a storm
have burst on the head of Jesus with like effect.
Foreseeing the peril to which he might be exposed, Jesus, " when
he knew how the Pharisees had heard that he made and baptized
more disciples than John, left Judea, and departed again into Gali-
lee," his nearest and most direct route lay through the central district
of Samaria. This district was inhabited by people of a foreign origin,
and with a somewhat curious history. When the king of Assyria car-
ried the Ten Tribes into captivity, it is said that, in order to fill the void
which their exile created, he brought "men from Babylon, and from
Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and
placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel;
and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof." 2 Kings
17 : 24 These certainly were idolaters, worshippers of a strange ined-
142 THE LIFE OF CHBIST.
ley of divinities, and brought with them their old faiths to their ue\¥
home. Shortly after their settlement, a frightful plague visited them,
and it occurred to themselves, or was suggested by the neighboring
Israelites, that it had fallen upon them because of their not worship*
ping the old divinity of the place. In their alarm they sent an em-
bassy to their monarch, who, either humoring or sharing their fears,
sent one of the captive Jewish priests to instruct them in the Israeli-
tish faith. This faith they at once accepted and professed, combining
it with their old idolatries : " They feared the Lord," we are told, " and
served their graven images." 2 Kings 17:41. Gradually, however,
they were weaned from their ancient superstitions. When, under the
decree of Cyrus, the captives of Judah and Benjamin, returning from
Babylon, set about rebuilding the temple at Jerusalem, the Samari-
tans proposed to join them in the work. The proposal was haughtily
rejected, and that rejection was the first of a long series of disputes. A
fresh ground of offence arose when Manasseh, a grandson of one, and
brother of another high priest, had, contrary to the laws and cus-
toms of the Jews, married a daughter of Sanballat, the governor of
the province of Samaria. Called upon to renounce this alliance and
repudiate his wife, Manasseh, rather than do so, fled from Jerusalem,
and put himself under the protection of his father-in-law. A consid-
erable number of the Jews who were dissatisfied with the great strict-
ness with wmich Nehemiah was administering affairs at Jerusalem,
followed him. The Samaritans, thus strengthened in numbers, and
having now a member of one of the highest families of the priesthood
among them, erected a rival temple on Mount Gerizim, and set up
there a ritual of worship in strict accordance with the Mosaic insti-
tute. Their history from this time to the time of Christ is a very
chequered one. Their territory was invaded by John Hyrcanus, one
of the family of the Maccabees, who plundered their capital, and raz-
ing the stately temple on Mount Gerizim from its foundations, left it
a heap of ruins, so that when Jesus passed that way, an altar reared
upon these rains was all that Gerizim could boast.
Notwithstanding all these vicissitudes, and all the harsh hostilities
to which they were exposed, the Samaritans became purer and purer
in their faith, till all relics of their Medo-Persian idolatries had dis-
appeared. They received, as of divine authority, the five Books of
Moses, the Pentateuch, but they rejected all the books of history and
prophecies which followed, and which were full, as the Jews believed,
of intimations of the future subjection of the whole world to Israeli-
tish sway, and the establishment of Jerusalem as the central place
of worship and the seat of universal empire.
THE WOMAN OF SAMAEIA. 143
But though the Jews despised the Samaritans as a people of a
mixed origin and a mutilated faith, and the Samaritans repaid the
contempt, we are not to think that the two communities lived so
much apart that there was no traffic or intercourse between them
There was little or no interchange of kindly or social feeling; but it
was quite within the limits of the common usage for the disciples to
go into a Samaritan town, to buy bread for themselves and their
Master by the way.
Their morning's walk had carried Jesus and his disciples across or
along the plain of Mukhna to the entrance of that narrow valley
which lies between .Mounts Ebal and Gerizim. Here, upon a spur of
the latter height which runs out into the plain, was Jacob's Well ; the
town of Sychar, the ancient Shechem, the modern Nablous, lying
about a mile and a half west, up in the valley, at the base of Geri-
zim. It was the sixth hour — our twelve o'clock — and the Syrian sun
glared hotly upon the travellers. Wearied with the heat of the day
and the toil of the morning, Jesus sat down by the well-side, while
his disciples went on to Sychar to make the necessary purchases. As
Jesus is sitting by the well alone, a woman of Samaria approaches.
He fixes his eye upon her as she comes near; watches her as she pro-
ceeds to draw the water, waiting till the full pitcher is upon the well-
mouth, and then says to her, " Give me a drink." He is a Jew; she
knows it by his dress and speech. Yet as one willing to be indebted
to her, he asks a favor at her hands ; a favor for which, if his look do
not belie him, he will be grateful. Not as one unwilling to grant the
favor, but surprised at its being asked, her answer is: "How is it that
thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, who am a woman of Samaria?"
He will answer this question, but not in the way that she expects.
The manner of his dispensation of the great gift he came from heav-
en to bestow stands embodied in the words: "Thou wouldest have
asked, and I would have given thee living water."*
* There is no doubt that the well still shown to travellers near Nablous is the
well of Jacob. Its position near to Sychar ; its importance as inferred from ita
dimensions, being a well of nine feet in diameter and seventy-five in depth ; cut
out of the solid rock, with sides hewn and smooth as Jacob's servants may be
supposed to have left them — go far, of themselves, to determine its identity ; and
the conclusion is confirmed by an undivided, unbroken tradition — Jewish, Sa-
maritan, Arabian, Turkish, Christian.
Besides the absence of all doubt as to its identity, there is another circum
stance which surrounds it with a peculiar sacredness. It is the one and onh
limited and well-defined locality in Palestine that you can connect with the pres-
ence of the Kedeemer. You cannot in all Palestine draw another circle of lim-
ited diameter within whose circumference you can be absolutely certain thai
Ill THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
The woman has taken him to be a common Jew, an ordinary wa}r-
farer, whom thirst and the fatigue of travel had overcome, forcing
him perhaps unwillingly to ask for water to drink. He will fix her
attention upon himself; he will stir up her feminine curiosity by tell-
ing her tha*j he who asks has something on his part to give; that if
she only knew who he was, and what that living water was which he
had at command, instead of stopping to inquire why he had asked
water of her, she would be asking it of him, and what she asked he
without question would have given. Living water! — better water
than that which she has in her pitcher. Could it be by going deeper
down, and getting nearer to the bubbling spring beneath, that he
could get such water ; or was it water of superior quality from some
other well than this of Jacob ? " Sir," she says, addressing him with
awakening interest and an increasing respect, " Sir," she says, in her
ignorance and confusion, " thou hast nothing to draw with, and the
well is deep : from whence then hast thou that living water ? Art thou
greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank there-
of himself, and his children, and his cattle ?" Her thoughts are wan-
dering away back to the first drinkers at this well, when its waters
first burst out in their freshness, imagining that it must be of them,
or of the water of some other neighboring well, that this stranger
had been speaking. Again, waiving as before all direct reply to her
Jesus once stood, except round Jacob's Well. I had the greatest possible desire
to tread that circle round and round, to sit here and there and everywhere around
that well-mouth ; that I might gratify a long-cherished wish. But never was
disappointment greater than the one which I experienced when I reached the
spot. Close by it, in early Christian times, they built a church, whose ruins now
cover the ground in its immediate neighborhood. Over the well itself they
erected a vaulted arch, through a small opening in which, travellers, a hundred
years, crept down into a chamber ten feet square, which left but a narrow mar-
gin on which to stand and look down into the well. This vaulted covering has
now fallen in, choking up so completely the mouth of the well, that it is only
here and there, through apertures between the blocks of stone, that you can find
an entrance into the well. I speak of it as I found it last year. It must have
been more accessible to travellers even a few years ago ; but year by year the
rubbish that is constantly being thrown into it accumulates, and the opeLing at
the top is becoming more closed. The Mussulmans of the neighborhood, seeing
the respect in which it is held by Christians, appear to take a pleasure in ob-
structing and defiling it. You cannot sit, then, by Jacob's Well, or walk around
it, or look down into its waters. It is stated upon good authority, that recently
the well, and the site around it, have been purchased by the Russian church.
Lei us hope that they will clear away all the stones and rubbish, and leave it
clear and open, as Jesus found it, when, weary and way-worn, he sat down be-
ude it
THE WOMAN OF SAMARIA. 145
question, Jesus with increased solemnity says : " "Whosoever drinkeilt
of this water shall thirst again : but whosoever drinketh of the watei
that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall
give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting
life." It is not this water, then; it is no common water; it is water
that this man alone can give; water which is not to be taken in
draughts, with which you may quench your thirst now, and then wait
till the thirst comes back again ere another draught be taken; but
water of which a man should constantly be drinking, and if he did so
would be constantly satisfied, so that there -would be no recurring
intervals of desire and gratification — this water as received turning
into a well within the man himself, springing up into everlasting life.
Beginning to understand a little, seeing this at least, that it was of
some element altogether different from any water that she had ever
tasted, yet clinging still to the notion that it must be some kind of
material water that he means, she says: "Sir, give me this water,
that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw."
One part of Christ's object has now been gained ; he has awa-
kened not an idle, but a very eager curiosity ; he has fixed the wom-
an's attention on himself as having some great benefit in his hand
which he is not unwilling to bestow. Through a figurative descrip-
tion of what this benefit is, he will not or cannot carry her farther at
present. Abruptly breaking the conversation off at this point, he
says to her: " Go, call thy husband, and come hither." With great
frankness she says, "I have no husband." Jesus said to her, "Thou
hast well said, I have no husband, for thou hast had five husbands,
and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband ; in that saidst thou
truly ' In the past domestic history of this woman there had been
much that was peculiar, though up to the last connection she had
formed there may not have been any thing that was sinful. Christ'a
object, however, was not so much to convict her of bygone or exist-
ing guilt, as to convince her that he was in full possession of all the
secrets of her past life, and so to create within her a belief in his
more than human insight. Not so much as one overwhelmed with
the sense of shame, but rather as one surprised into a new belief as to
the character and capabilities of the stranger who addresses her, she
replies, " Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet." If she had been
a woman of an utterly abandoned character, whose whole bygone
life had been one series of flagrant offences, whose conscience, long
seared with iniquity, Christ was now trying to quicken — very curious
would it appear that so soon as the quickening came, waiving all
questions about her own character, she should so instantly have put
UfeofCbrlT 10
146 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the question about the true place of religious worship, whether here
at Gerizim, or there at Jerusalem.
There may have been an attempt to parry conviction, and to turn
aside the hand of the convincer, by raising questions about places
and forms of worship; but I cannot think, had this been the spirit
and motive of this woman's inquiries, that Jesus would have dealt
with them as he did; for, treating them evidently as the earnest
inquiries of one wishing to be instructed, assuming all the dignity of
that office which had been attributed to him, he says to her, 'Wom-
an, believe me, the hour -cometh (I speak as one before whose eye the
whole history of the future stands revealed ; the hour cometh — I came
myself into the world to bring it on) when that strong bias to wor-
ship that lies so deep in the hearts of men, shall have found at last
its one only true and worthy object in that God and Father of all,
who made all, and who loves all, and has sent me to reveal him to
all; when, stripped of all the restraints that have hitherto confined it
to a single people, a single country, a single town ; relieved of all the
supports that were required by it in its weak and tottering child-
hood — the spirit of a true piety shall go forth in freedom over the
globe, seeking for those — whatever be the places they choose, the
outward forms that they adopt — for those who will adore and love
and serve him in spirit and in truth, and wherever it finds them,
owning them as the true worshippers of the Father. "Woman, be-
hove me, the hour cometh, when neither in this mountain nor yet in
Jerusalem, nor here, nor there, nor anywhere exclusively, shall men
worship the Father. " God is a Spirit ; and they that worship him,
must worship him in spirit and in truth." ' The newness, the breadth,
the sublimity, if not also the truth of his teaching, at once suggested
to the mind of the listener the thought of that Messiah for whom
every Samaritan and Jew alike were looking. "I know," she said,
" that Messias cometh. When he is come he will tell us all things."
Jesus saith to her, " I that speak unto thee am he."
Why was it that that which he so long and studiously concealed
from the Jewish people, that which he so strictly enjoined his dis-
ciples not to make known to them, was thus so simply, clearly, and
directly told ? In the woman herself to whom the wonderful revela-
tion was made, there may have been much to draw it forth. The
gentle surprise with which she meets the request of the Jewish
stranger; the expression of respect she uses so soon as he begins
to speak of God, and some gift of his she might enjoy ; her guileless
confession when once she found she was actually in a prophet's
presence ; her instant readiness to believe that Jew though he was —
THE WOMAN OF SAMARIA. 147
apparently of no note or mark among his brethren — he was yet a
prophet ; her eager question about the most acceptable way of wor-
shipping the Most High ; the quick occurrence of the coming Mes-
siah to her thoughts ; the full, confiding, generous faith that she at
once reposed in him when he said, " I that speak unto thee am he ;"
Uer forgetfulness of her individual errand to the well ; her leaving her
pitcher there behind her; her running into the city to call all the
men of Sychar, saying, "Come, see a man who told me all things that
ever I did; is not this the Christ?" all conspire to convince us that,
sinful though she was, she was hungering and thirsting after right-
eousness, waiting for the consolation of Israel, we trust prepared to
hail the Saviour when he stood revealed.
But besides her individual character, there was also the circum-
stance that she was a Samaritan. It is the first time that Jesus
comes into close, private, personal contact with one who is not of the
seed of Israel; for though she claimed Jacob as her father, neither
this woman nor any of the tribe she belonged to were of Jewish
descent. "I am not come," said Jesus, afterwards defining the gene-
ral boundaries of his personal ministry, "but to the lost sheep of the
house of Israel." When he sent out the seventy, his instructions to
them were : " Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city
of the Samaritans enter ye not." And yet there were a few occasions,
and this is the first of them, in which Christ broke through the
restraints under which it pleased him ordinarily to act. I believe
that there are just four instances of this kind recorded in the Saviour's
life : that of the woman of Samaria, of the Roman centurion, of the
Canaanitish woman, of the Greeks who came up to Jerusalem. All
these were instances of our Lord's dealings with those who stood
without the pale of Judaism, and as we come upon them in the nar-
rative, we shall be struck with the singular interest which Jesus took
in each ; the singular care that he bestowed in testing and bringing
out to view the simplicity and strength of the desire towards him,
and faith in him, that were displayed ; the fulness of the revelations
of himself that he made, and of that satisfaction and delight with
which he contemplated the issue. It was the great and good Shep-
herd, stretching out his hand across the fence, and gathering in a
lamb or two from the outfields, in token of the truth that there were
other sheep which were out of the Jewish fold, whom also he was
in due time to bring in, so that there should be one fold and one
shepherd.
Our idea, that it was this circumstance — her Samaritan national-
ity — which lent such interest, in our Saviour's own regard, to hia
148 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
interview with this woman by the well-side, is confirmed by casting a
glance at its result. Jesus at their entreaty turned aside, and abode
two days with the Sycharites. You read of no sign or wonder
wrought, no miracle performed, save that miracle of knowledge which
won the woman's faith. Though no part of it is recorded, his teach-
ing for those few days in Sychar was, in its general character, liko to
his teaching by the well-mouth, and on the ground alone of the
truthfulness, the simplicity, the purity, the spirituality, and the
sublimity of that teaching, many believed on him, declaring they
knew that this was indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.
The phrase is so familiar to the Christian ear, that we may fail to
mark its singularity as coming from the lips of these rude Samari-
tans. No Saviour this for Jew alone, or Samaritan alone; for any
one age or country. Not his the work to deliver from mere outward
thraldom, to establish either in Jerusalem or elsewhere any temporal
kingdom : his the wider and more glorious office to emancipate the
human spirit, and be its guide to the Father of the spirits of all flesh.
Compare the notions which these simple villagers had of the Mes-
siah, with those prevalent among the Jews ; compare with them any
of the most intelligent of our Lord's apostles up to the day of Pente-
cost, and your very wonder might create doubt, did you not remember
that it was not from the books of Daniel and Zachariah and Ezekiel,
the books from which the Jews by false interpretations derived their
ideas of the Messiah's character and reign, that the Samaritans de-
rived theirs, but from the Pentateuch alone, the five books of Moses :
and when you turn to the latter, and look at the prophecies regard-
ing Christ which they contain, you will find that the two things about
him to which they point — that he should be a prophet sent from God,
and that his office should have respect to all mankind, that to him
should the gathering of the people be, and that in him should all
families of the earth be blessed — were the very two things that the
faith of these Samaritans embraced when they said, "We know that
this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the ivorld"
The conversation by the well, the two fruitful days at Sychar,
what is the general lesson that they convey? That wherever Christ
finds an open listening ear, he has glad tidings that he is ready to
pour into it ; that wherever he finds a thirsting soul, he has living
waters with which he delights to quench its thirst; that to all who
are truly seeking him, he drops disguise and says: "Behold, even I
that speak unto you, am he;" that wherever he finds minds arid
hearts longing after a re relation of the Father, and the true mode of
worshipping him, to such is the revelation given. Had you but stood
THE WOMAN OF SAMARIA 149
by Jacob's well, and seen the look of Jesus, and listened to the tones
of his voice ; or had you been in Sychar during those two bright and
happy days, hearing the instructions so freely given, so gratefully
received, you would have had the evidence of sense to tell you with
what abounding joy to all who are waiting and who are willing, Jesus
breaks the bread and pours out the water of everlasting life. Multi-
plied a thousandfold is the evidence to the same effect now offered to
the eye and ear of faith. Still from the lips of the Saviour of the
world, over all the world the words are sounding forth: "If any man
thirst, let him come to me and drink." Still the manner of his dis-
pensation of the great gift stands embodied in the words : " Thou
wouldest have asked, and I would have given thee living water."
And still these other voices are heard catching up and re-echoing oui
Lord's own gracious invitation : " And the Spirit and the bride say,
Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is
athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life
freely."
149a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
There may be said to be two distinct types of work on the part
of Christ during the period of this lesson, as pointed out by the author
on pages 174, 175.
During the first part of the time, John the Baptist was still in the
field prosecuting his mission as Christ's forerunner. Jesus therefore
made this a time when he himself confined his work mostly to pre-
senting himself as Messiah to the Jewish leaders in Judea and Jerusalem,
and testing their attitude toward him, which was one of rejection.
But the time came when John was cast into prison, and the Saviour
then felt that the point had come when he would more publicly pro-
claim the new kingdom in discourses such as those in the synagogues
at Nazareth and Capernaum and throughout Galilee, and would begin
definitely to summon certain men to leave their ordinary pursuits
and to follow him as those who could be prepared to become
apostles. As can be noted, the first of these types of work closes
and the second begins in this Study.
PART I. PREPARATION AND EARLY MINISTRY.
Study 5. First Public Cures and Discourses.
(1) Christ's devotion to spiritual work 1496-151
a. His meat to do the Father's will 1496
b. Ripeness of the spiritual harvest 150
c. Sower and reaper can rejoice together 150, 151
(2) Healing of the nobleman's son 151-155
a. The father comes from Capernaum to see Jesus at Cana. . . . 151, 152
b. Christ's call for a higher type of faith 152-154
c. The nobleman responds to the call and returns 154, 155
d. His son is cured 155
e. The nobleman and his household become true believers .... 155
(3) Comparison with the case of the centurion's servant 155-157
a. Both are cures at a distance, but Christ's method with the
applicants is different 155, 156
6. The centurion begins with unbounded faith 156
c. Christ announces that he will come down and heal the
servant 156
d. This opens the way for the centurion's indication of his
wonderful faith 156
e. Jesus' words of commendation and warning 156, 157
(4) Healing of the infirm man at the pool of Bethesda 157-166
a. Jesus is at Jerusalem probably at the second Passover of his
ministry and visits the pool of Bethesda 157, 158
THE NOBLEMAN AND THE CENTURION 14%
b. He finds the infirm man who for thirty-eight years has
sought relief 159
c. By obeying the word of Christ the man is restored, takes
up his bed, and goes his way > 159
d. Controversy of Christ with the Jews over his healing on the
Sabbath 159, 160
e. Christ reveals that he is one with the Father in his works 161-166
'5) Christ's first visit to Nazareth and rejection 166-174
a. Approach to Nazareth from the south 166, 167
b. Situation of town and suggestions to the eye 167, 168
c. Christ's Scripture selection and discourse 168-170
d. Anger of the people and his deliverance 170, 171
e. Meaning of the event 172-174
(6) Jesus' intense activity in Capernaum and Galilee 174-183
a. What went before was a testing of the Jews 174, 175
b. Removes to Capernaum 176
c. He now calls his first apostles 176
d. A Sabbath filled with words and healing deeds 177-180
e. Christ's period of solitary prayer 180
/. His circuit through eastern Galilee 180-183
xv.
The Jewish Nobleman and the Roman Centurion.*
Seated by the side of Jacob's well, and seeing the Samaritan
woman draw water out of it, Jesus seizes on the occasion to discourse
to her of the water of life. So soon as she hears from his own lips
that he is the Messiah, this woman leaves her water-pot behind her,
and hurries into the neighboring city to announce to others the great
discovery which has been made to her. She has scarcely left the
Saviour's side, ere his disciples present themselves with the bread
which they had bought in Sychar, offering it, and saying to him,
" Master, eat." But as if hunger had gone from him, and he cared not
now for food, he answers, " I have meat to eat that ye know not of."
Wondering at his manner, his appearance, his speech, so different
from what they had expected, the disciples say to one another — it is
the only explanation that occurs to them — " Hath any man brought
him aught to eat?" Correcting the false conception, our Lord replies :
" My meat is to do the will of Him that sent me, and to finish his
work." He had been eating that meat, he had been doing that will,
while they were away ; and so grateful had it been to him to be so
engaged, so happy had he been in instructing a solitary woman, and
* John 4 : 46-54 ; Luke 7 : 1-10.
150 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
sending her away, in full belief in his Messiahship, to go and bring
others to him, that in the joy of a spirit whose first desire had been
granted to it, the bodily appetite ceases to solicit, and the hunger oi
an hour ago is no longer felt. She is gone, but already foreseeing all,
he anticipates her return — hears and acts upon the invitation given,
has the fruit of these two productive days at Sychar before his eyes,
looking upon the few sheaves then gathered in as the first-fruits of a
still wider, richer harvest. The idea of that harvest filling his mind,
he looks over the fields around him, and blending the natural and
the spiritual together, he says to his disciples : " Say not ye, There
are yet four months, and then cometh harvest ? Behold, I say unto
you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields, for they are white
already to harvest. And he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gath-
ereth fruit unto life eternal: that both he that soweth and he that
reapeth may rejoice together. And herein is that saying true, One
soweth, and another reapeth." How many contrasts as well as anal-
ogies between the husbandry of nature and the husbandry of grace
do these words set forth ! The sower in the fields of nature has
always four months to wait ; such is the interval in Palestine between
seed-time and harvest. In those other fields in which Jesus is the
chief sower, as in the very corner of them at Sychar, sometimes the
seed has scarcely sunk into the soil ere it springs up ready for the
reaper's hands. Then not seldom the ploughman overtakes the
reaper, and the reapers and the sowers go on together. And yet
there is often, too, an interval; nor is it always even generally true
that it is he who sows who reaps. Nowhere is the common proverb,
that one soweth and another reapeth, oftener verified than here. In
the spiritual domain it is the lot of some to do little else all their
lives than sow, to sow long and laboriously without seeing any fields
whitening unto the harvest ; it is the lot of others to have little else to
do than gather in the fruits of others' labors; or, looking at the
broad history of the world and of the church, can we not mark cer-
tain epochs which we would particularly characterize as times of
sowing, others as times of reaping, sometimes separated by wide
intervals, sometimes running rapidly into one another ? But whether
they be the same or different agents that are employed in the sowing
and in the reaping; whether longer space intervene or the sowing
and the reaping go together, one thing is true, that when the harvest
cometh, and the everlasting life, towards which all the labor has been
tending, is reached, then shall there be a great and a mutual rejoi-
cing — the gladness of those to whom it is given to see that their laboi
has not been in vain in the Lord.
THE NOBLEMAN AND THE CENTURION. 151
It has always been a question whether there was any allusion
made or intended by Christ to the actual condition of the fields
around him as he spake. I cannot but think, though it may be in
opposition to the judgment of some of our first scholars, that there
was. Jesus was speaking at the time when there were as yet four
months unto the h arrest. If it were so, then we have good ground
for settling at what period of the year this visit of our Lord to Sychar
took place. The harvest in Palestine begins about tke middle of
April. Four months back from that time carries us to the middle of
December, the Jewish seedtime. If so, the interval between the first
Passover at which our Lord had his conversation with Nicodemus,
which took place, as we know, at the commencement of the early
harvest, and the conversation with the woman of Samaria, an inter-
val of no less than eight months, was spent by Jesus in Judea, giv-
ing to the rulers of the people a privileged opportunity of considering
Christ's character and claims. Nothing but disappointment, neglect,
indifference, or alienation having been manifested, Jesus retired to
Galilee, taking Samaria by the way. The two days at Sychar pre-
sented a striking contrast to his reception in Judea. How will they
stand in comparison with the reception that awaits him in Galilee ?
Cana lies farther north than Nazareth. The road to the one
would lead close to, if not through the other. On this occasion
Jesus appears to have passed by Nazareth. Perhaps it was to avoid
such a reception as he knew to be awaiting him there, or it may have
been simply because Mary and the family had shifted their residence,
and were now living near their relatives at Cana. The rumor of the
first miracle which he had wrought there some months before may
have spread widely in the neighborhood. It was done, however, so
quietly, and in such a hidden manner, that one can well conceive of
different versions of it going abroad. It was different with those
reports which the Galileans who had been up at the last Passover
brought back from Jerusalem. Our Lord's miracles there, whatever
they were, were done openly ; many had believed because of them.
The Galileans who were at the feast had seen them all, and on their
return home had filled the country with the noise of them, all the
more gratified, perhaps, that he who had drawn all eyes upon him at
Jerusalem was one of themselves. And now it is told abroad that he
has come back from Judea and is at Cana.
The tidings reach the ear of a nobleman in Capernaum, a Jew of
high birth connected with the court of Herod Antipas, at the very time
that a grievous malady is on his son, and has brought him to the very
brink of death. He had not heard, perhaps, that Jesus had restored
152 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
the dying to health ; so far as we know, the healing of his son may
have been the first miracle of that kind which Jesus wrought; but he
has heard of his turning the water into wine, he has heard of the
wonders wrought at Jerusalem. He by whom such miracles had
been done should be able to rebuke disease. It is at least worth try-
ing whether he will or can. The distance to Cana is but a short one,
some twenty miles or so. He will send no servant, he will go himself,
and make the trial. He went, saw Jesus, told him his errand, and
besought him that he would come down and heal his son. Why was
it that before Jesus made any reply, or gave any indication of his
purpose, he said, as the fruit of some deep inward thought which the
application had suggested, " Except ye see signs and wonders ye will
not believe"? It was because he saw all that was in that man, all
the motives by which he had been prompted to this visit; the strong
affection for his son, which Jesus will not rebuke ; his willingness to
be at any pains on his behalf, to seek help from any quarter; his
partial faith in Christ's power to help — for without some faith of this
description, he would not have come at all; yet the absence of all
deeper faith springing from a sense of spiritual disease, which should
have brought the man to Jesus for himself as well as for his son, and
which should have taught him to look to Jesus as the healer of the
soul. It was because he saw in this nobleman a specimen of his
countrymen at large, and in his application a type and prelude of the
multitude of like applications afterwards to be made to him.
It may have served to suggest this the more readily to Christ's
thoughts, and give the greater intensity to the emotion excited within
his breast, that he had just come from Sychar, where so many had
believed in him without any sign or wonder done, believed in him as
a teacher sent from God, believed in him as the Messiah promised to
their fathers. What a contrast between those simple-minded, sim-
ple-hearted Samaritans, whose love and wonder, faith and penitence,
joy and gratitude had been so quickly, so purely, so exclusively
awakened, and this nobleman of Capernaum and his Galilean fellow-
countrymen ! We know that Jesus never returned to Sychar, though
he must more than once have passed near to it on his way to and
from Jerusalem. We know that he gave positive instructions to the
Seventy to go into no city of the Samaritans. It was in fulfilment of
his design that his personal ministry should be confined to the lost
sheep of the house of Israel, that he laid this restraint upon himseli
and his disciples. But can we think that it cost him no self-denial,
that it was with no inward pang that Jesus turned away from those
who showed themselves so willing to receive, to those who were foj
THE NOBLEMAN AND THE CENTURION. 153
ever asking a sign from heaven, and who, "after he had done so
many miracles, yet believed not in him" ? John 12 : 37. Why was
it, then, that when the Pharisees came forth and began to question
him, seeking of him a sign from heaven, " he sighed deeply in his
spirit, and said, Why doth this generation seek after a sign ?" Mark
8 : 12. The deep sigh came from the depth of a spirit moved and
grieved at this incessant craving for outward seals and vouchers, this
unwillingness to believe in him simply on the ground of his character
and his doctrine. Though he did not meet the peculiar demand of
the Pharisees, who, unsatisfied even with his other works, sought
from him a special sign from heaven, our Lord, we know, was lavish
in the performance of miracles, supplied willingly and largely that
ground of faith which they afforded, appealed often and openly to
the proof of his divine mission which they supplied. Yet all this is
consistent with his deploring the necessity which required such a
kind of evidence to be supplied, and his mourning over that state of
the human spirit out of which the necessity arose. " The works that
I do bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me." " If I do
not the works of my Father, believe me not. But if I do, though ye
believe not me, believe the works." John 5 : 36; 10 : 37, 38. Such
was Christ's language, openly addressed to the rulers of the people
at Jerusalem. Nor was it differently that he spoke to his disciples in
private : " Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me :
or else believe me for the very works' sake." John 14:11. Jesus
would rather have been believed in without the works, would rather
that he had not had the works to do in order to win the faith. It is
not, then, a faith in the reality of miracles, nor in him simply as the
worker of them, nor in any thing he was or said or did that rests
exclusively upon his having performed them, which constitutes that
deeper faith in himself to which it is his supreme desire to conduct
us. And when we read of Jesus sighing when signs were asked, and
sighing as miracles were wrought by him, we cannot interpret his
sighing otherwise than as the expression of the profound grief of his
spirit over those who are so little alive to the more spiritual evidence
that his character and works carried along with them, as to need to
have these outward props and buttresses supplied. There are two
different kinds of faith — that which you put in what another is, or in
what another has said, because of your own personal knowledge of
him and your pei^eption of the intrinsic truthfulness of his sayings,
and that which you cherish because of certain external vouchers for
his truthfulness that he prints. Jesus invites us to put both these
kinds of faith in him, but the latio. an( j tu« w«« — - ■ « - j —
154= THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to tlie former and the higher, the real abiding, life-giving faith in him
as the Saviour of our souls.
" Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe." We are
scarcely surprised that the nobleman of Capernaum, when his eager
entreaty was met in this way, by the utterance of so broad an aphor-
: sm, should have felt somewhat disappointed and chagrined. Tluere
was some hope for him indeed, had he reflected on it, in the words
that Christ had used; for if Jesus had not meant to do this sign and
wonder, he would not have spoken as he did. But the father is in no
mood to take up and weigh the worth and meaning of Christ's words.
What he wants is that Christ should go down with him immediately
to Capernaum ; he has some hope, that if there, he may be able to
cure his son. He has no idea of a healing wrought at a distance,
effected at Cana by a word of the Lord's power, an act of the Lord's
will. " Sir," he says, " come down ere my child die :" a tinge of
impatience, perhaps of pride, yet full of the good compensatory ele-
ment, strong paternal love. "Jesus saith unto him, Go thy way; thy
son liveth." It is the first time, it is one of the few instances in
which Jesus stood face to face with earthly rank and power. Per-
haps this nobleman presumed on his position, when he said, with
something of an imperative tone, " Sir, come down ere my child die."
If so, he must have been not a little astonished to find the tone of
command rolled back upon him thus: " Go thy way; thy son liveth."
How high above the nobility of earth rises the royalty of heaven!
This is the style and manner of Him who saith, and it is done ; who
commandeth, and creation throughout all its borders obeys. None
ever did such works on earth as Jesus did; none ever did them in
such a simple, easy, unaffected manner; the manner becoming one
who was exerting not a delegated but a native power.
The manner and the substance of the declaration told alike at
once upon the nobleman. It satisfied him that the end of his visit
was gained. He believed in the word of Jesus, that the death he
dreaded was not to come upon his son, that the child he loved so
tenderly was to be spared to him. Exactly how this had been brought
about he did not as yet know. Whether the cure had been instanta-
neous and complete, or whether the crisis of it had passed and the
recovery had begun ; whether it had been by his possession of a super-
human knowledge or by his exercise of a superhuman powor that
Jesus had been able to announce to him the fact, " 1'hy son liveth,"
he neither stayed, nor did he venture to ask any explanation. It was
enough for him to be assured of the fao+> and there was something
in the mannov i» _i,:~i~ i^b «q 4Zt/ way" had been spoken which
fHE NOBLEMAN AND THE CENTTJBION. 155
forbade delay. He meets his servants by the way, bearers >i glad
tidings. With them he can use all freedom. He asks all about the
cure, and learns that it had not been slowly, but instantaneously,
that the fever had gone, and that the time at which it had done so
was the very time at which these words of Jesus, "Thy child liveth,''
had been spoken at Cana. He had gone out to that village but hall
a believer in Christ's power in any way to help, limiting that power so
much in his conception that it had never once occurred to him that
Jesus could do any thing for him unless he saw the child. But
now he feels that he has been standing in the presence of One the
extent of whose power he had as much underrated as the depth
and tenderness of his love. Awe, conviction, gratitude filJ his soul.
A double sign and wonder has been done in Israel. A tfhild has
been cured of a fever at Capernaum by one standing miles away at
Cana, and a father has been cured of his unbelief — the same kind of
power that banished the disease from the body of the one banishing
distrust from the heart of the other.
How far above all that he had ever asked ! His child was dying
when the father left Capernaum, was still nearer death when he
arrived at Cana. Had Jesus done what the father wanted, and gone
down with him to Capernaum, his son might have been dead ere they
got there. The word of power is spoken, and just as the disease is
clasping its victim in a last embrace, it has to relax its grasp, take
wings, and fly away. The father has gone unselfishly, affectionately
on an errand of love, seeking simply his child's life, not asking
or caring to get any thing himself from Christ. But now in this
Jesus he recognizes a higher and greater than a mere healer of the
body. Spiritual life is breathed into his own soul. Nor is this all ;
he returns to Capernaum to tell all the wonders of the cure ; tells them
to the healed child, who also believes — and strange would be the
meeting afterwards between that child and Jesus — he tells them to
the other members of his family, and each in turn believes. He him-
self believed, and with him all his house — the first whole household
brought into the Christian fold.
Let us compare for a moment this case with that of the centurion.
Both plead for others ; the one for his child, the other for his servant,
and the pleading of both is signally successful; the compliance prompt
and generous. Such honor doth Jesus put on all kindly intereessior
with him on behalf of those to whom we are bound by ties of rela-
tionship and affection. In both the cases, too, Christ adopts the unu-
sual method of curing at a distance, curing by a word. But the treat-
ment of the two applicants is different — suited to the state, the char-
156 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
acter, the necessities of each. The one's faith is limited and weak,
and needs to be expanded and strengthened; the other's is strong,
and waits only to be exhibited in combination with that humility
which covers it as with a crown of glory. The one man, little know-
ing what Christ can do for him, and impatient at what looks like a
repulse, says in his haste, " Sir, come down ere my child die." The
other, having a boundless faith in Jesus, ventures not at first to pre-
scribe any special mode of cure, but contents himself with sending
some elders of the Jews to ask that Christ's healing power should be
exercised on behalf of his servant. Jesus goes not with him who
asks him to do so, having a far greater thing to do for him than to
comply with his request. But he no sooner gets the message deliv-
ered by deputy from the other, than he says, " I will come and heal
him," and sets off instantly on the errand. But he knew that he
should be arrested by the way. He knew that the Boman centurion
had such a sense of his own unworthiness that he shrank from receiv-
ing him into his house ; he knew that he had such confidence in his
power that all he wanted was that Jesus should will it, and his ser-
vant should be cured. He knew that there was a humility and a faith
in the breast of this Gentile officer — the first Gentile that ever applied
to him — such as was not to be found in any Israelitish bosom. It
was to bring these before the eyes of his fellow-countrymen, and to
hold them up for admiration and rebuke, that he did not at the first
act as he had done at Cana, but made that movement towards the
centurion's dwelling. Wonderful, indeed, the faith embodied in the
message which the centurion sent : ' I, a Roman officer, have a lim-
ited authority, but within its limits this authority is supreme. I can
say unto one of my soldiers, Go, and he goeth; to another, Come,
and he cometh ; to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it. But thou,
Jesus, art supreme over all. As my soldiers are under me, so under
thee are all the powers and processes of nature. Thou canst say to
this disease, Come, and it cometh ; to that other disease, Go, and it
goeth ; to thy servants Life and Death, Do this, and they do it. Say
thou then but the word, and my servant shall be healed.' And Jesus
marvelled when he heard the message, and he turned about and said
to the people that followed him — it was very much for their sakes
that he had arranged it so, that so many peculiarities should attend
this miracle, and such a preeminence be given to this first exhibition
of Gentile faith in him — " I say unto you, I have not found so great,
faith, no not in Israel." It was the highest exercise of human faith
in him that Jesus had yet met with, and he wondered and rejoiced
that it should be found beyond the bounds of Israel. Midway be-
THE POOL OF BETHESDA. 167
fcween the Gentile and the Jew stood the woman of Samaria ; outside
the bounds of Judaism stood this Roman centurion. Was it to pre-
figure the great future of the gathering in of all people and nations
and tongues and tribes that so early in his ministry such a manifesta-
tion of faith in the Saviour was made ?
But while wondering with Christ at the beautiful exhibition oi
humility and faith in a quarter so unlooked-for, let us take home the
warning with which Jesus followed up the expression of his approval
and admiration : "And I say unto you, that many shall come from
the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and
Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven ; but the children of the kingdom
shall be cast into outer darkness, there shall be wailing and gnash-
ing of teeth." Surely from the lips of the living and compassionate
Redeemer words of such terrible import never would have passed,
had the warning they convey not been needed. Let it then be the
first and most earnest effort of each of us to enter into this kingdom,
of which nominally and by profession we are the children, in all
humility, and with entire trust in Christ our Saviour, lest the oppor-
tunity for entering in go past, and the door be shut — shut by him
who shutteth, and no man openeth.
XVI.
The Pool of Bethesda.*
Could we ascertain what the feast was to which Jesus went up,
and at which he healed the man beside the pool of Bethesda, it
would go far to settle the question as to the length of our Lord's
public ministry ; but after all the labor that has been bestowed on
the investigation, it remains still uncertain whether it was the Pass-
over, or one of the other annual festivals. If it was the Passover —
as, upon the whole, we incline to think it was, as John mentions
three other Passovers, one occurring before, and two after this one —
Christ's ministry would come to be regarded as covering a space oi
about three years and a half ; if it were one or other of the lesser
festivals, a year or more, according to the festival which is fixed upon,
must be deducted from that period. This much, at least, appears
certain, that it was our Lord's second appearance in Jerusalem after
his baptism, and that it occurred at or near the close of a year, the
most of which had been spent in Judea. On the occasion of this
* John- 5.
158 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
second visit, Jesus went one Sabbath-day to walk through the clois-
ters or colonnades that were built round a large swimming bath,
called the pool of Bethesda. Tradition has for many ages pointed to
a large excavation, 360 feet long, 130 feet broad, and 75 feet deep,
lying outside the north wall of the Harem enclosure, and near to St.
Stephen's gate, as having been this pool. The peculiar character of
its masonry establishes the fact that it must have been intended ori-
ginally as a reservoir for water. At one of its corners there are two
arched openings or vaults, one twelve, the other nineteen feet wide,
extending backward to an unknown distance, forming part, it may
have been, of the porches of which the evangelist speaks. These
porches, on the day on which Jesus visited them, were crowded.
They formed one of the city resorts ; and, besides numbers of others
that frequented them for the ordinary use of the waters, there lay
around a great multitude of the blind, the halt, and the withered,
waiting for the moving of the water.
If we accept the account given in the fourth verse of the fifth
chapter, the moving of the water, and the healing virtue temporarily
bestowed upon it during the period of its commotion, were due to
angelic agency. The verse, however, is wanting in many of the
most ancient manuscripts, and has come now to be very generally
regarded as an interpolation very naturally inserted by the early
transcribers of the gospel, as embodying the expression of what was
then the popular belief. We are disposed the rather to concur in
this view, when we consider how unlike to angelic influence is the
kind of agency here attributed to it as elsewhere described in Holy
"Writ, and how singular it would have been had the healing power
been so bestowed that it should be restricted to the single person
who first stepped in. Of itself this would not be sufficient ground on
which to reject the idea of a supernatural agency having been em-
ployed, but if the verse alluded to did not form part of the original
writing of the evangelist, then we are left at fiber ty to believe that
this was a pool supplied by an intermittent spring, which at certain
seasons, owing to the sudden formation of particular gases, bubbled
up, throwing the whole water of the reservoir into commotion, im-
pregnated for the time with qualities which had a healing power over
some forms of disease — a power of course greatly magnified in the
popular idea. But whether the verse, and the explanation which it
contains of the moving of the water, be accepted or rejected, the nar-
rative of what Jesus said and did remains untouched.
Wandering through these crowded porches, and looking at the
strange arrav of the diseased waiting there for the auspicious moment,
THE POOL OF BETHESDA. 159
the eye of Jesus rests on one who wears a dejected and despairing
look, as if he had given up all hope. Thirty-eight years before, tho
powers of life and motion had been so enfeebled that it was with the
greatest difficulty, and at the slowest pace, he could creep along the
ground. His friends had got tired perhaps of helping him otherwise,
and as their last resource, had carried him to the porches of the pool,
and left him there to do the best for himself he could. And he
had done that best often and often, yet had failed. Every time the
troubling of the water came, he had made the effort ; but every time
he had seen some one of more vigor and alertness, or better helped,
get in before him, and snatch the benefit out of his hands. Jesus
knew all this : knew how long it had been since the paralytic stroke
first fell on him ; how long it was since he had been brought to try
the efficacy of these waters ; how the expectation of cure, at first full
and bright, had been gradually fading from his heart. To rekindle
the dying hope, to fix the man's attention on himself, Jesus bends
over the bed on which he lies, looks down at him, and says, " Wilt
thou be made whole?" Were the words spoken in mockery? That
could not be ; a glance at the speaker was sufficient to disprove it.
But the question surely would not have been asked had the speaker
known how helpless was he to whom it was addressed. He said, " I
have no man, when the water is troubled, to put me into the pool,
but while I am coming another steppeth down before me." As he
gives this explanation, he looks up more earnestly into the stranger's
face — a face he had never seen before — and gathers a new life and
hope from the expression of sympathy, the look of power that coun-
tenance conveys.
" Jesus saith unto him, Eise, take up thy bed, and walk." The
command was instantly obeyed. The cure was instantly complete.
The short time, however, that it had taken for him to stoop and lift
the mattress on which he lay, had been sufficient for Jesus to pass
on, and be lost among the crowd. The stopping, the question, the
command, the cure, all had been so sudden, the man has been so
taken by surprise, that he doubts whether he would be able to recog-
nise that stranger if he saw him again. Lifting his bed, and rejoi-
cing in the new sensation of recovered strength, he walks through the
city streets in search of his old home and friends. The Jews — an
expression by which, in his gospel, John always means, not the gene-
ral community, but some of the ecclesiastical heads and rulers of the
people -the Jews see him as he walks, and say to him: "It is the
Sabbath-day; it is not lawful for thee to carry thy bed." No answer
could be more natural, as no excuse could be more valid, than that
160 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
which the man gave when he said : " He that made me whole, the
same said unto me, Take up thy bed and walk." His challengers do
not ask him any thing about the healing — as soon as they hear of it,
fchey suspect who the healer v, as — but fixing upon the act in which
the breach of the Sabbath lay, and as if admitting the validity of the
man's defence, in throwing the responsibility of that act upon him
who had ordered him to do it, " They asked him, What man is that
which said unto thee, Take up thy bed and walk?" He could not
tell, and so the conversation by the wayside dropped.
Soon after, the healed man is in the temple, thanking God, let us
believe, for the great mercy bestowed upon him. Jesus, too, is there ;
but they might have passed without the healed recognising the healer.
It was not the purpose, however, of our Lord that it should be so.
Finding the man among the worshippers, he says to him, "Sin no
more, lest a worse thing come unto thee." Nothing more seems to
have been said ; nothing more to have passed between the two ; but
fchat short sentence, what a light it threw upon the distant past !
reminding the man that it had been to the sins of his youth that he
had owed the eight-and-thirty years* of infirmity that had follow-
ed; and what a solemn warning did they carry as to the future — re-
minding him that if, on being restored to strength, he should return
to sin, a still worse thing than so many years of bodily infirmity
might be in store for him. Jesus gives this warning, and passes on.
Recognising him at once as he who had cured him beside the pool, the
man inquires about him of the bystanders, and learns now who he is.
And he goes and tells the Jews ; not, let us hope, from any malicious
motive, or any desire to put an instrument into the hands of Christ's
enemies. Considering where and how he had so long been lying, he
may have known so little of all that had recently happened, as to
imagine that he was at once pleasing the rulers, and doing a service
to Jesus, by informing them about his cure. But it was no new intel-
ligence that he conveyed. The Jews, we presume, knew well enough
who had effected this cure. But it was the first instance in which
fchey had heard of Jesus' healing on the Sabbath-day — of itself in
then- eyes a violation of its sanctity ; and as it would appear that, not
content with this offence, he had added another in ordering the man
to carry on that day a burden through the streets — a thing strictly
and literally prohibited by the law — it may have gratified the Jews
to be able to convict Jesus of a double breach of the Sabbath law by
direct and indubitable evidence from the man's own lips. You can
imagine the secret though malignant satisfaction with which they got
and grasped this weapon, one at once of defence and of assault ; how
THE POOL OF BETHESDA. 161
they would use it in vindicating their rejection of Christ as a teacher
sent from God; for could God send a man who would be guilty of
such flagrant breaclies of his law? how they would use it in carrying
out those purposes of persecution already brooding in their breasts.
Their hostility to Jesus, which had been deepening ever since his
daring act of cleansing the temple, now reached its height. From
this time forth — and it deserves to be especially noted as having occur-
red at so early a stage, inasmuch as it forms the key to much of our
Lord's subsequent conduct — they sought to slay him, because he had
done those things on the Sabbath-day. But though the purpose to
slay him was formed, it was not expressed, nor attempted to be ear-
ned out. Things were not yet ripe for its execution. Jesus might
be convicted as a Sabbath-breaker, and all the opprobrium of such a
conviction be heaped upon his head; but as things then stood, it
would not be possible to have the penalty of death inflicted on him
upon that ground. They must wait and watch for an opportunity of
accusing him of some crime which will carry that penalty even in the
eyes of a Roman judge.
Though not serving them much in this respect, they have not to
wait long till, in their very presence — so that they have no need to
ask for other proof — Jesus commits a still higher offence than that of
violating the Sabbath. Aware of the charges that they were bring-
ing against him as to his conduct at the pool of Bethesda, he seizes
upon some public opportunity when he could openly address the
rulers ; and in answer to the special accusation of having broken the
Sabbath, he says to them, '"My Father worketh hitherto, and I
work." The rest into which my Father entered after his work of
creation, of which your earthly Sabbath rest is but a type, was not
one of absolute inactivity — of the suspension, cessation of his agency
in and over the vast creation he had formed. He worketh on still ;
worketh on continuously, without distinction of days, through the
Sabbath-day as through all days, sustaining, preserving, renewing,
vivifying, healing. Were this work divine to cease, there would not
be even that earthly Sabbath for you to rest in. And as he, my
Father, worketh, so work I, his Son, knowing as little of distinction
of days in my working as he. By process of nature, as you call it —
that is, by the hand of my Father — a man is often cured on the Sab-
bath-day. And it is only what he thus does that I have done, and
aiy authority for doing so is this, that I am his Son.'
Whatever difficulty the men to whom this defence of his alleged
Sabbath-breaking was offered, may have had either in understanding
its nature or appreciating its force, one thing is clear, that they did
Ul« of I'lul.l. JJ
162 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
at once and most clearly comprehend that in speaking of God as his
Father in the way he did, Jesus was claiming to stand to God, not
simply in the relationship of a child — such a relationship as that in
which we all, as the creatures of his power and the preserved of his
providence, may be regarded as standing — but in that of a close, per-
sonal, peculiar sonship belonging to him alone, involving in it, as all
true filiation does, unity of nature between the Father and the Son.
It was thus that the Jews understood Jesus to speak of the Father
and of himself, when he so associated himself with the Father, as to
imply that if his Father was not a breaker of the Sabbath in healing
men upon that day, neither was he, his Son ; and so they sought
the more to kill him, because he had not only broken the Sabbath,
but said also that God was his own Father, making himself equal
with God.
If the Jews had misunderstood Jesus, what was easier than
for him to have said so ; to have denied and repudiated the allega-
tion that he had intended to claim any thing like equality with God?
Instead of this, what does Jesus do? He goes on to reassert, to ex-
plain, and to expand what had been implied in the compendious ex-
pression he had employed. Any thing like such distinction between
the Father and the Son as that the one would or could judge, or will,
or act independently of the other — without or against the other — he
emphatically and reiterateclly repudiates: "Verily, verily, I say unto
you, the Son can do nothing of himself;" "I can of my own self do
nothing." The very nature of the relationship forbade it that the
Son ever would or could assert for himself any such independence of
the Father as the .creature, in its wilfulness and sinfulness, is apt to
assert for himself. But though all such separation and indepen-
dence of council and of action is here precluded, so complete is the
concert that what things soever the Father doeth the same doeth
the Son likewise. Some things that the great Divine Master Work-
man does, a superior scholar may copy or imitate. But Jesus does
not say, what things the Father does, the Son does other things
somewhat like them ; but the same things, and whatever things the
Father doeth, the same doeth the Son, and doeth them likewise, that
is, in the very same manner, by the exercise of the same powei , for
the furtherance of the same ends.
In far greater works than that simply of healing, will the unity ci
action between them be made to appear. One of these greater woi ks
is that of quickening the dead, by the incommunicable prerogative
of the Creator. This prerogative the Father and the Son have equal-
ly. As he wills, and by his will, the Father quickeneth; so too does
THE POOL OF BETHESDA. 163
the Son. The highest form of life is that which is breathed into
souls spiritually dead. This life is of the Son's imparting equally
as of the Father's. It comes through the hearing of Christ's word ;
through a believing in the Father as he who sent the Son. Verily,
verily, I say unto you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the
dead — the spiritually dead — shall hear the voice of the Son of God,
and they that hear shall live. Another work peculiar to divinity is
that of judging ; approving, condemning, assigning to every man at
last, in strict accordance with what he is, and has been, and has done,
his place and destiny. Who but the all- wise, all-just, all -gracious
God is competent for such a task? but that task, in the outward
execution of it, the Father has devolved upon the Son, giving him
authority to execute it, because he is not simply the Son of God, in
which character he needs not such authority to be conveyed to him ;
but because he is also the Son of man, and it is in that complex or
mediatorial office with which he is invested, that he is to sit upon the
Throne of Judgment at the last, when all the inhabitants of the earth
shall stand before his tribunal. Should this then be a subject for
marvel? for the hour was coming, though not yet come, when all that
are in their graves shall hear Christ's voice and shall come forth ; they
that have done good to the resurrection of life, and they that have done
avil to the resurrection of condemnation. Having thus unfolded the
great truth of the unity of will, purpose, and action, between the Fath-
er and the Son, Jesus ceases to speak of himself in the third person,
and proceeds onward to the close of his address, to speak in the first
person, and that in the plainest way,* of the testimonies that had been
* "I can of mine own self do nothing : as I hear I judge : and my judgment
is just ; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath
sent me. If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. There is another
that beareth witness of me ; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of
me is true. Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth. But I re-
ceive not testimony from man : but these things I say, that ye might be saved.
He was a burning and a shining light ; and ye were willing for a season to re-
joice in his light. But I have greater witness than that of John : for the works
which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear wit-
ness of me, that the Father hath sent me. And the Father himself, which hath
sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any
time* nor seen his shape. And ye have not his word abiding in you : for whom
he hath sent, him ye believe not. Search the Scriptures ; for in them ye think
ye have eternal life : and they are they which testify of me. And ye will not
eome to me, that ye might have life. I receive not honor from men. But I
know you, that ye have not the love of God in you. I am come in my Father's
name, and ye receive me not : if another shall come in his own name, him ye
will receive. How can ye believe, which receive honor one of another, and seek
164 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
borne to him, that of the Father, that of John, that of his own work^
that of the Holy Scriptures, all of which these Jews had wilfully re-
jected. Now the accused becomes the accuser. Now he who had been
charged as a Sabbath-breaker, rises to the height of that very eleva-
tion which they had regarded him as a profane and blasphemous man
for venturing to claim; and he tells these unbelieving Jews, as one
knowing the hearts of all men, and entitled to judge, and exercising
that very authority with which, as the Son of man, he had been clothed,
he tells them, that they had not the love of God in them, nor his
word abiding in them ; that they did not believe Moses when he wrote
of Him ; that, much as they reverenced their Scriptures, they only
believed in them so far as they tallied with their own thoughts and
fancies. Still further, he declares that there was this great obstacle
in the way of their receiving one who came to them as Jesus did, in
the name of the Father, to do alone the Father's will, that they were
all too busy seeking after the honor that came from man, minding
earthly things, and seeking not the honor that came from the one only
living and true God ; attributing thus all their perverseness to moral
causes, to motives operating within, over which they should have had
control ; this being their condemnation, that they would not come to
him that they might have life. He would, but they would not.
If Jesus Christ were but a man, what are we to make of such a
discourse as this ? What are we to make of the first part of it, in
which he speaks of the Father and his connection with him ? What
of the second part of it, in which he speaks to the Jews and of their
treatment of him? We know not which would be the worst — the
arrogance in the one direction, or the presumption and uncharitable-
ness in the other — if this were but a man speaking of the Creator,
and to his fellows. It can alone relieve him from the guilt of profane
assumption towards God, and unlicensed liberty with man, to believe
that Jesus was really that which the Jews regarded him as claiming
to be, the Son of, the equal with the Father, whom all men should
honor, even as they honor God.
But let me ask now your particular attention to the circumstances
under which this marvellous discourse was spoken, and to the object
which, in the first instance, as at first delivered, it was intended to
serve. Jesus voluntarily, intentionally created the occasion for its
delivery. The miracle here — the healing of the impotent man at the
not the honor that cometh from God only ? Do not think that I "will accuse you
to the Father : there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.
For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me : for he wrote o< ma
But if yo believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words ?"
THE POOL OF BETHESDA. 166
pool of Bethesda — was a wholly secondary or subordinate matter,
intended to bring Christ into that relationship with the Jewish rulers
which called for and gave its fitness and point to this address. Why
did Jesus choose a Sabbath-day to walk in the porches of Bethesda?
Why did he do what only on one or two occasions afterwards he did,
instead of waiting to be applied to, himself single out the man and
volunteer to heal him ? Why did he not simply cure the man, but
bid him also take up his bed and walk? He might have chosen
another day, and then, in the story of the cure, we should have had
but another instance added to the many of the exertion of our Lord's
divine and beneficent power. He might have simply told the man to
rise up and walk, and none could have told how the cure had been
effected, or turned it into any charge. He chose that day, and he
selected that man, and he laid on him the command he did, for the
very purpose of bringing himself front to front with the Jewish
rulers. At first the question between thero seems to refer only to the
right keeping of the Sabbath. Had Jesus as a man, as a Jew, bro-
ken the Sabbath law in curing a man upon that day ? Had he bro-
ken it in telling the man he healed to carry his bed through the city?
Had the Jews not misunderstood, overstrained the law, sticking to
its letter, and violating its spirit ? These were grave questions, with
which, as we shall find, Jesus afterwards did deal, when on another
Sabbath he volunteered another cure. But here Christ waives all
lesser topics — that, among the rest, of the right interpretation of the
Sabbath law —and uses the antecedent circumstances as the basis on
which to assert, and then amplify and defend, the truth of his true
and only sonship to the Father. His ministry in Judea was now
about to close. Aware of the design against his life which had now
been formed, and wishing to baffle it for a season, he retires to Gali-
lee. But he will not leave Jerusalem till he has given one full and
public testimony as to who and what he is, so that the Jews in con-
tinuing to reject him, shall not have it in their power to say that he
has not revealed his own character, nor expressed to them the real
grounds upon which their opposition to him is based.
Such was the special drift and bearing of the address of Jesus as
originally delivered to the Jews. But is there nothing in its close
applicable to ourselves and to all men in every age ? The same kind
of obstacles that raised such a barrier in the way of the Jews believ-
ing in Jesus, do they not still exist? If the spirit of pride and world-
liness, a conventional piety and an extreme thirst for the applause
and honor that cometh from man, occupy and engross our hearts,
will they not indispose and render us unable to believe simply, heart-
166 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ily, devotedly on Jesus Christ ? Of one thing let us be assured, thai
whatever be our disposition and conduct towards him, his towards us
is ever a longing desire to have us, keep us, bless us, save us; and
that the one and only thing that stands in the way of our enjoying
all the benefits of his salvation, is our own unwillingness ; his lament
over all that wander away from him being ever this, " Ye will not
come to me, that ye might have life."
xvn.
The Synagogue of Nazareth.*
In the route commonly taken from Jerusalem to the sea of Gali-
lee, one of the most interesting day's travel is that which carries you
from Jenin across the three valleys into which, at its upper extrem-
ity, the great plain of Esdraelon divides, and up to Nazareth, as it
lies embedded in the southern ridge of the hills of Galilee. Cross-
ing the first valley, we skirted the base of the mountains of Gilboa,
and paused for a few moments upon a gentle elevation, now occupied
by a few houses of the humblest description, on which Jezreel, the
ancient capital of Israel, once stood, with the palace of Ahab in its
circuit, and the vineyard of Naboth hard by. Our eye wandered
along the twelve or fourteen miles of dead-level that run from Jez-
reel to Carmel, and the figure of the great prophet running before
the king's chariot rose before us. "We turned round and gazed upon
the slopes of Gilboa, and the tide of Saul's last battle seemed to roll
over them, and the sounds of the funeral dirge of David to be linger-
ing still among the hills. The crossing of the next valley carried us
to the base of Little Hermon, where a small hamlet lies, consisting
of a few miserable-looking hovels, surrounded by ill-kept gardens.
This was the Shunem in which the house once stood which had in it
the prophet's chamber; and these were the gardens in one of which
his kind hostess* son sickened unto death. Leaving behind us the
place which, in the old prophetic times, saw the dead child given
back to his mother, climbing Little Hermon and descending on the
other side, we entered another village which witnessed another dead
son given back to another bereaved mother, by Him who touched the
bier, and said, " Young man, I say unto thee, arise." Here, in this
village of Nain, we came for the first time on the traces of our Lord's
Galilean ministry. The third plain passed, a steep ascent earned us
* Luke 4 : 16-31.
THE SYNAGOGUE OF NAZARETH. 167
to the summit of that range of hills which forms the northeastern
boundary of the plain of Esdraelon. Descending, we came upon a
circular, basin-shaped depression, girdled all round by a dozen or
more swelling hill-tops that rise from three to four hundred feet
above the yalley they enclose. Near to the foot of the highest of
these surrounding hills, nestled in a secluded upland hollow, lies the
village of Nazareth. No village in Palestine is more like what it was
in the days of Jesus Christ, and none more fitting to have been his
residence during the greater part of his life on earth. The seclusion
is perfect, greater even than that of Bethany, which on one side looks
out openly upon the country that stretches away to the shore of the
Dead sea. Nazareth is closed in on every side, offering to us an
emblem of the seclusion of those thirty years which were passed there
so quietly. Pure hill-breezes play over the village, and temper the
summer heat. The soil around is rich, and yields the fairest flowers
and richest fruits of Palestine. You seem shut out from the world,
and yet you have but to climb a few hundred feet to the top of the
overlooking hill, and one of the widest, finest prospects in all the
Holy Land bursts upon your view. Away in the west, a sparkling
light plays upon the waters of the Mediterranean, revealing a portion
of the Great Sea that formed the highway to the isles of the Gentiles.
The ridge of Carmel runs out into the waters, closing in the bold
promontory on the side of which Elijah stood and discomfited the
prophets of Baal. Southward, below your feet, stretches the great
battle-plain of Palestine, behind which rises 'the hilly district of
Samaria, through the opening between which and the mountains of
Gilboa the eye wanders away eastward across the whole breadth of
the Holy Land, till it rests upon that range, the everlasting eastern
background of every Syrian prospect — the mountain range of Bashan
and Gilead and Moab. Turning northward, the whole hill-country
of Galilee lies spread out before us, the sea of Gennesaret hidden,
but a glimpse of Safed obtained, the city set upon a hill, above and
beyond which there rise the snowy heights of Hermon, called by the
Arabs the Sheikh of the Mountains.
Up to the hill-top which commands this magnificent prospect,
how often in childhood, youth, and early manhood must Jesus have
ascended, to gaze — who shall tell us with what thoughts ? — upon the
chosen scene of his earthly ministry, and upon that sea over whose
waters the glad tidings of salvation were to be borne to so many
Jands. It pleases us to think that so many years of our Lord's life
were spent in such a home as that which Nazareth supplied ; one so
retired, so rich in natural beauty, with glimpses of the wide world
168 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
around for the morning or evening hours. There it was, in the fields
below the village, that he had watched how the lilies grew, and seen
with what a gorgeous dress, in coloring above that of kingly purple,
their Creator clothed them. There, in the gardens, he had noticed
how the smallest of all seeds grew into the tallest of herbs. There,
outside the house, he had seen two women grinding at one mill;
inside, a woman hiding the leaven in the dough. There, in the mar-
ket-place, he had seen the five sparrows sold for the two farthings.
The sheep-walks of the hills and the vineyards of the valleys had
taught him what were the offices of the good shepherd and the care-
ful vine-dresser; and all the observations of those thirty years were
treasured up to be drawn upon in due time, and turned into the
lessons by which the world was to be taught wisdom.
No means are left for ascertaining what impression was made
during these thirty years upon the inmates of his home, the play-
mates of his boyhood, the associates of his youth, the villagers
generally in the midst of whom he grew up. It may readily be believed
that the gentleness, the truthfulness, the lovingness displayed by him,
must have won respect. Yet we can imagine, too, that the unearthly
purity and sanctity of such a childhood and such a manhood may have
created an awe, a sense of distance and separation, which in meaner
spirits might deepen into something like aversion and dislike. At
last he leaves them, and is not seen in Nazareth for many months.
But the strangest tidings about him are afloat through the village.
First, they hear of what happened at his baptism in the Jordan, then
of what he did a few miles off at Cana, then of his miracles in Jeru-
salem, then of his curing the nobleman's son of Capernaum ; and now
he is once more among them, and the whole village is moved. The
Sabbath-day comes round. He had been in the habit all through
these thirty years of attending in the synagogue; sitting there quietly
and unobtrusively, taking part in the prayers and praises, listening
to the reading of the law and of the prophets, and to the explanations
of the passages which were read, with what kind and amount of self-
application none of all around him knew. But how will he comport
himself in the new character that he has assumed? The synagogue
is crowded with men among whom he has been brought up, all curi-
ous to see and hear. The earlier part of the service goes ol as usual.
The opening prayer is recited ; the opening psalm is chanted ; the
portion from the law, from the book of Moses, is read by the ordina
ry minister ; the time has come for the second reading — that of some
portion of the prophets — when Jesus steps forth and stands in the
reader's place There is no challenging of his right to do so. It w
THE SYNAGOGUE OF NAZAEETH. 169
not a right belonging exclusively to priest or Levite ; any Jew of any
tribe might exercise it. But there was a functionary in every syna-
gogue regularly appointed to the office. This functionary, in this
instance, at once gives way, and hands to Jesus the roll of the prophet
out of which, according to the calendar, the reading for the day is to
be taken. It is the roll of the prophet Isaiah. Jesus opens it, and
whether it was that the opening verses of the sixty-first chapter were
those actually appointed for that day's service, or whether it was that
the roll opened at random and these verses were the first that pre-
sented themselves, or that Jesus, from the whole book, purposely
selected the passage, he read as follows : " The Spirit of the Lord is
upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the
poor ; he hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliver-
ance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at
liberty them that are bruised; to preach the acceptable year of the
Lord." And stopping there, in the middle of the sentence, he closed
the book, gave it to the minister, and sat down upon the raised seat
of the reader, taking the attitude usually assumed by Jewish teachers.
There was a breathless stillness. The eyes of all that were in the
synagogue were fastened on him. "This day," said Jesus, "is this
Scripture fulfilled in your ears."
It was a Scripture universally understood to be descriptive of the
coming Messiah, his office, and his work. Jesus gives no reason for
appropriating and applying it to himself; he offers nothing in the
shape of argument or evidence in favor of his being indeed the
Christ, the Anointed of the Holy Ghost. He contents himself with
the simple authoritative assertion of the fact. We have indeed but
the first sentence given that he spoke on this occasion. What fol-
lowed, however, we may well believe to have been an exposition of
the passage read, as containing an account of the true character,
ends, and objects of his mission as the Christ of God; the telling
who the poor were to whom he brought good tidings, who the bruised
and the broken-hearted were whom he came to heal, who the bound
were that he came to liberate, who the blind whose eyes he came to
open, what that year was he came to usher in — the long year of
grace which still runs on, in the course of which there is acceptance
for all of us with God, through Christ. As Jesus spake of these
things — spake with such ease, such grace, such dignity —the first
impression made upon the Nazarenes, his old familiar friends, was
that of astonishment and admiration. He had got no other, no better
education than that which the poorest of them had received. He
had attended none of the higher schools in anv of the larger towns.
170 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
had sat at the feet of none of then- chief rabbis to be instructed in
the law; vet no rabbi of the schools could speak with greater fluen-
cy, greater authority, greater confidence. Soon, however, as from
the mere manner, they began to turn their thoughts to the substance
of this discourse, and began to realize what the position really was
which Jesus was assuming — that it was nothing short of the very
highest that ever any son of man was to reach; that it was as the
Lord's anointed Christ that he was speaking, and speaking to them
as the poor, the blind, the captives, to whom he was to render such
services — the admiration turns into envy. Who is he that is arroga-
ting to himself all this dignity, authority, and power? who is speak-
ing to them as so immeasurably his inferiors, as needing so much his
help? Is not this the son of honest, plain, old Joseph, whom we all
so well remember as our village carpenter? His brethren and his
sisters, are they not here beside us in the synagogue, listening, appa-
rently with no great delight or approval, to this new strain in which
their brother has begun to speak? He the Messiah, the opener of
our eyes, the healer of our hearts, our deliverer from bondage ! Be-
fore he asks us to believe any such thing of him, let him show us
some sign from heaven ; do some of those miracles that they say he
has done elsewhere, particularly at Capernaum. If he wanted us,
who have all known him so well from his childhood, to believe in him
as a prophet, he should have come to us first, convinced us first,
unfolded his credentials to us first, wrought his first miracles here in
Nazareth. Jealousy heightens the offence that envy had created, and
ere long the whole company in that synagogue is looking at him
askance. Jesus sees this, and turning from his former subject of dis-
course, tells them that he sees and knows it, lays open their hearts to
them, puts the very words into their lips that they were ready to
utter, and proceeds to vindicate himself for not showing any special
sign to his fellow-townsmen, by quoting two instances in which Elijah
and Elisha, the two great workers of miracles among the prophets,
passed over all their feUow-countrymen to show favor to the Sidonian
widow and the Syrian officer. There is nothing that men dislike
more than that the evil and the bitter things hidden in their breasts
should be brought to light. It aggravates this dislike when the dis-
coverer and revealer of their thoughts is the very person against
whom the malignant sentiment is cherished. Should he remain calm
and uninrpassionecl, neither taken by surprise, nor betraying irrita-
tion, they are so much the more incensed. So felt the Xazarenes
under the address of our Lord; and when he proceeded to assume
the mantle of EHiah and Elisha, as if he were of the same order with
THE SYNAGOGUE OF NAZAEETH. 171
these great prophets of the olden time, it is more than they can any
longer bear. They will be lectured no more in such a way by the son
of the carpenter. They rise, they rush upon him, they thrust him
out of the Tillage, and on to the brow *>f a precipice over which they
would have hurled him ; but it pleased him to put forth that power ;
anl to lay upon them that spell which he laid upon the high priest's
band in the garden of Gethsemane. They are hurrying him to the
brow of the hill ; he turns, he looks, the spell is on them, their hands
drop powerless by their sides ; he passes through the midst of them,
they offer no resistance, and before they recover themselves he is gone.
About two miles from Nazareth there is a hill which shows, upon
the side facing the plain of Esdraelon, a long and steep descent. The
monks of the middle ages — the determiners of most of the sites of the
holy places in Palestine — fixed on this as the precipice over which
the angry Nazarenes designed to throw our Saviour, and gave it the
name of the Mount of Precipitation. The very distance of this mount
from the village goes far to disprove the tradition regarding it. But
though this distance had been less, it could not have been the place,
for it is distinctly stated by the evangelist that it was a brow of the
hill on which the city was built from which they intended to cast
him. Modern travellers are all agreed that it must have been from
some part of the rocky cliff which overhangs the oldest quarter of the
present village of Nazareth that Jesus was about to have been thrown.
This rocky cliff extends for some distance along the hill on which
Nazareth is built, and shows at different points perpendicular descents
of from thirty to forty feet, which, as they have been filled up below
with accumulations of rubbish, must originally have been much deeper.
Any one of these would so far answer to the description given by the
evangelist. In taking this view, however, it is necessary to suppose
that on leaving the synagogue, with the deliberate intention of killing
him, the infuriated Nazarenes either forced Jesus up the height from
which they designed afterwards to cast him, or made a circuit up and
round the hill, in order to reach the intended spot. The same ascent
which it must have been needful thus to make I made, in company
with Kev. Mr. Zeller, who for some years has been resident as a mis-
sionary in Nazareth. On getting to the top of the ridge, we found
ourselves on a nearly level plateau of considerable extent. There
were no houses on this plateau, but Mr. Zeller pointed out to us here
and there those underground cisterns which are the almost infallible
signs of houses having once been in the neighborhood. Here, then,
on this plateau, a portion if not the whole of the ancient Nazareth
may have stood. If it was so — if even a few houses of the old vil-
i72 THE LIFE OF OHEIST
lage were here — then, as we know it to have been the rule that, wher-
ever it was possible, the synagogue was built on the highest ground
in or near the city or village to which it belonged, it must have been
on this elevated ground that the synagogue of Nazareth stood, not
far from the brow of the hill. It seems more likely that the Naza-
renes should, in the frenzy of the moment, have attempted to throw
our Lord from a precipice quite at hand than that, acting on a delib-
erate purpose, they should have spent some time, and climbed a hill
in order to its execution.
But turning now from the locality and outward circumstances of
this event in our Saviour's life, let us try to enter into its meaning
and spirit. So far as we know, this was the first occasion on whicb
Jesus addressed an audience of his countrymen in the synagogue on
the Sabbath-day ; it would appear indeed to have been the only one
on which he took the duty of the reader as well as that of the exhorter.
It was a common enough thing for any one, even a stranger, to be
asked, when the proper service of the synagogue was over, to address
some words of instruction or encouragement to the audience. The
gospels tell us how frequently Jesus made use of this opportunity ;
and you may remember how at Antioch and Pisidia, after the read-
ing of the law and the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent unto
Paul and Barnabas saying, " Men and brethren, if ye have any word
of exhortation for the people, say on." The peculiarity of the inci-
dent now before us lay in this, that Jesus first read the passage from
the prophets, and then grounded directly upon it the address which
he delivered. In this respect we might regard it as the first sermon
ever preached; the text chosen, and the discourse uttered by our
Lord himself. Had these Nazarenes, who, in their insatiate and zeal-
ous craving after signs and wonders, wanted him only to do the same
or greater things than he had done in Capernaum, but known how
highly honored, far above that of its being made a mere theatre for
the exhibition of divine power, their synagogue was, in being the first
place on earth in which that instrument was employed which has
boen so mighty through God to the pulling down of the strongholds
of the ungodly and the upbuilding of the church, their vanity might
have been gratified; but they slighted the privilege thus enjoyed,
and so lost the benefit.
The body of the first synagogue sermon of our Saviour has been
lost. The text and introductory sentence alone remain ; but how
much do they reveal to us of the nature, the needfulness, the pre-
ciousness of those spiritual offices which our Divine Redeemer came
on earih to execute, and which he still stands waiting to discharge
THE SYNAGOGUE OF NAZARETH. 173
towards our sinful humanity ! It was to a company of a few hun-
dreds at the most that the words of Jesus were spoken in the syna-
gogue at Nazareth ; but that desk from which they were spoken was
turned into the centre of a circle whose bounds are the ends of the
earth, and that audience has multiplied to take in the whole family
of mankind. To the men of every land in every age Jesus has been
thus proclaiming what the great ends are of his mission to this earth.
To open blinded eyes, to heal bruised and bleeding and broken hearts,
to unlock the doors, and unloose the fetters of the imprisoned and
the bound ; to announce to the poor, the meek, the humble that theirs
is the kingdom of heaven ; and to proclaim to all that this is the year
of our Lord, the long year of Christ that takes in all the centuries
down to his second coming, the year in every day and every hour
and every moment of which our heavenly Father waits to forgive,
receive, accept all contrite ones who come to him. Such, our Sav-
iour tells us, is that great work of grace and power for whose accom-
plishment he has been anointed of the Father and replenished by the
Spirit. In that high office to which he has thus been set apart, and
for which he has been thus qualified, we all need his services. There
is a spiritual blindness which Jesus only can remove; a spiritual
imprisonment from which he only can release; a deadly spiritual
malady eating in upon our heart which he alone can heal. And shall
he not do all this for us, if we feel our need of its being done, since
the doing of it is the very design of his most gracious ministry among
the sinful children of men ? Let us not do him the injustice to believe
that he will be indifferent to the accomplishment of the very errand
of mercy on which he came, or that he will refuse in ours or in any
case to enlighten and emancipate, bind up and heal.
It seems to us to throw a distinct, and, though not a very broad,
yet a very clear and beautiful beam of light on the graciousness of
our Lord's character, that instead of reading the number of verses
ordinarily recited, he stopped where he did in his quotation from
Isaiah. Had he gone on, he should have said, "to proclaim the
acceptable year of the Lord, and the day of vengeance of our God."
Why not go on, why pause thus in the middle of the sentence ? not
assuredly that he meant either to deny or hide the truth, that the
day of vengeance would follow upon the acceptable year, if the
opportunities of that year were abused and lost ; but that then and
now, it is his chosen and most grateful office to throw wide open the
arms of the heavenly mercy, and invite all to throw themselves into
them and be saved.
But though he came in the Spirit to those among whom he had
174 I'flE LIFE OF CHRIST.
been brought up, though he came thus to his own, by his own he wari
not received, by his own he was despised and rejected. His treat-
ment at Nazareth was a foreshadowing of the treatment given gener-
ally to him by his countrymen, and terminating in his crucifixion on
Calvary. The rude handling in the Galilean village, the binding, the
scourging, the crucifying in the Jewish capital, were types of that still
rougher spiritual handling, that crucifying of our Lord afresh which
the world, in every age, has gone on repeating. It was their very
familiarity with him in the intercourse of daily life which proved such
a snare to the Nazarenes, and tempted them into their great offence.
Let us fear lest our familiarity with him of another kind — the fre-
quency with which we hear about him, and read about him, and have
him in one way or other set before us — blind our eyes and blunt our
hearts to the wonders of his redeeming love, and the exceeding riches
of his grace and power.
XVIII.
First Sabbath in Capernaum, and First Circuit
of Galilee.*
The first eight months of our Lord's ministry were spent, as we
have seen, in Judea. By the sign from heaven, by the Baptist's
proclamation, by Christ's own words and deeds, he was presented to
the rulers and to the people as the Son of God, the Messiah. His
character was misunderstood ; his claims were rejected. At Jerusa-
lem a plot against his life was formed ; it was no longer safe for him
to reside where the Jewish authorities had power. Jesus retired to
Galilee. John 4 : 1-3. Besides the purpose of placing himself be-
yond the reach of the scribes and Pharisees of Jerusalem, another
circumstance seems to have had its influence in directing Christ's
footsteps into Galilee. He heard that John was cast into prison.
The Baptist's work was over; the labors of the Forerunner were
closed ; the ground was open for Jesus to occupy. Hitherto, in his
earlier Judean ministry, he had neither publicly taught in the syna-
gogues, nor openly and indiscriminately healed the sick, nor called
any other disciples to his side than those who voluntarily and tem-
porarily followed him.f We may safely say, then, that prior to his
* Matt. 4 : 12- 22, 23-25 ; Mark 1 : 21-39 ; Luke 4 : 42-44.
f His disciples, indeed, in imitation of John's practice, had begun to baptize,
but as soon as "the Lord knew how the Pharisees had heard that Jesus had
FIKST SABBATH IN CAPEKNAUM. 175
appearance in Galilee, lie had taken no steps either to proclaim the
advent of the kingdom, or, by the selection of a band of chosen
adherents, to lay the foundation of that new economy which was to
take the place of the one which was now waxing old and was ready to
vanish away. It looks as if, before fully and openly entering on the
task of providing a substitute for that Judaic economy which his own
kingdom was to overturn, Jesus had gone up to Jerusalem, and given
to the head and representatives of the Jewish commonwealth the
choice of receiving or rejecting him as their Messiah. It was not,
at least, till after he had been so rejected in Judea, that he began in
Galilee to preach the gospel of the kingdom, (Matt. 1 : 15,) and to
plant the first seeds of that tree whose leaves were to be for the
healing of the nations. This helps to explain at once the marked
difference between Christ's course of conduct during the period which
immediately succeeded his baptism, which was passed in Judea, and
the laborious months in Galilee which followed, and the marked
silence regarding the former which is preserved by the first three
evangelists, who all make our Lord's ministry begin in Galilee, and
contain no allusion to any thing as happening between the tempta-
tion in the wilderness and the opening of his ministry there. Nor do
they allude to any visits of Jesus to Jerusalem prior to those which
he made after his final departure from Galilee, and which preceded
his crucifixion. With them, up to that time, Galilee appears as the
exclusive theatre of our Lord's labors. It is to the supplemental
gospel of St. John that we are indebted for all our knowledge of the
memorable incidents in Judea, which preceded the first preaching in
the synagogue of Nazareth. "We can understand this singular silence
of the first three evangelists, if we regard our Lord's earlier appear-
ance and residence in Judea as constituting rather a preliminary
dealing with the Jews, in the way of testing their disposition and
capacity to welcome him as their own last and greatest prophet, than
as forming an integral part of that work whereby the foundations of
the Christian church were laid.
Kejected by the chiefs of the people in the capital, Jesus come?
to Galilee. There, in the synagogue of the town in which he had
made and baptized more disciples than John, (though Jesus himself baptized
not, but his disciples,) he left Judea, and departed again into Galilee." John
4 : 1-3. It would seem to have been a sudden impulse of zeal in their Master's cause
which led those first disciples to engage so eagerly in baptizing — a zeal which,
instead of checking or rebuking, Jesus dealt with by quietly cutting of the occa-
sion for its display. By his own removal to Galilee, an entirely new state ol
things was ushered in, and by John's imprisonment his baptism ceased ; nor do
we read anywhere of a Galilean baptism by the disciples of Jesus.
176 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
lived so many years, lie first publicly proclaims his office and his
work, as the healer of the broken-hearted, the restorer of sight
to the blind, the deliverer of the captives, the preacher of the gospel
to the poor — an office and a work which had nothing of confinement
in it, nothing restricting it to any one age or country. But there,
too, by his fellow-townsmen at Nazareth, as by the rulers of the cap-
ital, he is rejected, and so he descends to the shores of the sea of
Galilee. Walking by these shores, he sees first Andrew and Peter
casting a net into the sea. He says to them, "Follow me, and I
will make you fishers of men. Straightway they leave all and follow
him." A little farther on, another pair of brothers, James and John,
are in their boat mending their nets. He calls them in the same way,
and they leave their boat and their nets, their father and the hired
servants, and follow. He was not speaking to strangers, to those
previously ignorant or indisposed to follow him. Andrew was one of
the two disciples of John who had heard the Baptist say, " Behold
the Lamb of God," and who had followed Jesus. The other of these
two disciples was John. Andrew had brought his brother Peter to
Jesus; and though it is not said that John had done the same with
his brother James, the latter must already have been acquainted with
Christ. Andrew, Peter, and John had followed Jesus from Betha-
bara to Cana, and had witnessed there the first of his miracles. They
had been up at Jerusalem, and seen the miracles which Jesus wrought
at the first Passover which he attended. They may have taken part
in the baptizing, may have been with Jesus at the well of Jacob.
Mention is made of disciples of Jesus being there with him, and who
so likely to be among them as those who first followed him from
Bethabara? But they do not appear as yet to have attached them-
selves permanently to his person, nor to have attended him on his
return from his second visit to the metropolis, nor to have been with
him at Nazareth. The stopping of the baptisms, the imprisonment
of John, the scattering of his disciples, may have thrown them into
some doubt as to the intentions of the new Teacher. For a time a*
least they had returned to their old occupation as fishermen, and
were busily employed at it when Jesus met them ; but his voice fell
upon ears that welcomed its sound, his command upon spirits that
were ready to obey. Not that they understood as yet that the sum-
mons was one to relinquish finally their earthly calling. The present
was but a preliminary invitation to follow Jesus, and chiefly by hear-
ing what he said, and watching what he did, to be instructed by him
in the higher art of catching men. It was not till weeks afterwards
that they were solemnly set apart as his apostles.
FIKST SABBATH AT OAPEKNAUM. 177
In the meantime, however, they accompanied him into (Japernaum.
The entrance of Jesus, attended by the two well-known brothers —
who, from the mention of hired servants belonging to one of them,
we may believe, ranked high among their craft — was soon known
throughout all the town. The inhabitants of Capernaum had already
heard enough about him to excite their liveliest curiosity. That curi-
osity had the keenest edge put on it by the manner in which the
cure of the nobleman's child' had been effected. And now he is
among them. It would be a crowded synagogue on the Sabbath-
day when he stood up there to preach for the first time the gospel of
the kingdom of God. Nothing of what he said upon this occasion
ka* been preserved. The impression and effect upon his auditors
are alone recorded: "They were astonished at his doctrine; for he
taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes;" "his
word was with power." Mark 1:22; Luke 4:32. The scribes, the
ordinary instructors of the people, presented themselves simply as
expositors of the law, written and traditional, claiming no separate or
independent authority, content with simply discharging the office of
commentators, and resting their individual claims to respect on the
manner in which that office was fulfilled. But here is a teacher of
quite a new order, who busies himself with none of those difficult or
disputed questions about which the rabbis differed; who speaks to
the people about a new kingdom — the kingdom of God — to be set up
among them, and that in a tone of earnestness, certainty, authority,
to which they were unaccustomed. What can this new kingdom be,
and what position in it can this Jesus of Nazareth occupy?
Of one thing they are speedily apprized, that it is a kingdom op-
posed to that of Satan, intended to destroy it. For among them was
a man possessed with a devil, who, as Jesus stood speaking to them,
broke in upon his discourse, and, with a voice so loud as to startle
the whole synagogue, cried out, addressing himself to Jesus, " Let us
alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth; art
thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, the Holy One
of God." He speaks in the name of others, as representing the
whole company of evil spirits, to whom, at that time, here and there, it
had been alio wed to usurp the seat of will and power in human breasts,
and so to possess the men in whom they dwelt as to strip them of
their volition and conscious identity, and to turn them into human
demons. But how came this human demon into the synagogue, and
what prompted him to utter such cries of horror and of spite? Was
this devil as mucJi beside himself as the poor man in whom he dwelt?
Had the presence the look, the words of Jesus such a power ovex
Life of Christ. 12
178 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
him that as the man could not regulate or restrain his own actions,
so neither could the deyil regulate or, restrain his thoughts and
words? His exclamations sound to our ear like the mad, involunta-
ry, impotent outcries of the vassals of a kingdom who feel that the
reins of empire are passing out of their hands, but who cannot give
them up without telling who the greater than they is who has come
to' dispossess them of their power.
Whatever may be thought of the kind of pressure under which
the devil who possessed this man acted ; whether the testimony he
gave to our Lord's character be regarded as free and spontaneous,
intended rather to injure than to honor ; or whether it be regarded as
unwillingly drawn forth by close personal contact with the Holy One,
the testimony so given was not welcomed by Christ. It came unsuit-
ably from a quarter whence no witness should be borne to him, nor
was wished for, as it came unseasonably, when premature revelations
of his true character were not desired. In other instances as well as
this Jesus did not suffer the devils to speak, "because they kne^\
him," acting as to them on the same principle on which he often cau-
tioned those whom he healed and his own disciples not to make him
known, seeking by such repression to prevent any hurrying forward
before its time of what he knew would be the closing catastrophe of
his career. But though refused thus, and as it were rejected by oui
Lord, its first wild, impatient utterances all that it was permitted to
give forth, this voice is most striking to us now as a testimony from
the demon-world, through which a knowledge of who Jesus truly
was seems so rapidly to have circulated. The prince of darkness, in
his temptation of our Lord a year before, seems himself to have been
in some doubt, as he put the question so often, " If thou be the Sod
of God." But no doubt was entertained by the devils who came, as
Luke tells us, " out of many, crying out and saying, Thou art Christ,
the Son of God." Luke 4 : 41. Some have thought that those demo-
niacs whom Christ cured were lunatics, and nothing more ; men whose
deranged and disordered intellects were soothed down into calmness
and order by the gentle yet firm voice and look and power of Christ.
But what are we to make of the unique testimony that so many of
them gave to Christ's Messiahship and Sonship to God ; and that al
the very commencement of his ministry? Were lunatics the only
ones who knew him ? or whence got they such knowledge and sucl
faith ?
Accepting, with whatever mystery the whole subject of demoniac
possession is clothed, the simple account of the evangelists, it does
appear most wonderful — the quick intelligence, the wild alarm, the
FIRST SABBATH IN CAPERNAUM. 17'J
terror-striking faith that then pervaded the demon-world, as if all the
spirits of hell who had been suffered to make human bodies their
habitation, grew pale at the very presence of Jesus, and could not
but cry out in the extremity of their despair.
"Hold thy peace," said Jesus to the devil in the synagogue, "and
come out of him." The man was seen to fall, torn as by violent con-
vulsions; a loud, inarticulate, fiendish cry was heard to issue from
his lips ; (Mark 1:36; Luke 4 : 35 ;) hale and unhurt, the devil gone,
the man himself again, he rose to converse with those around, and to
return to his home and friends. Amazement beyond description
seized at once on all who saw or heard of what had happened. Men
said to one another, in the synagogue, on the streets, by the high-
ways, ' What thing is this, what a word is this ! for with authority he
commandeth even the unclean spirits, and they do obey him. And
immediately (it could scarce well have been otherwise) the fame of
Him went out into every place of the country, and spread abroad
throughout all the region round about Galilee.' Mark 1 : 27, 28 ;
Luke 4 : 36, 37. Chiefly, however, in Capernaum did the excitement
prevail, begun by the cure of the demoniac in the synagogue, quick-
ened by another cure that followed within an hour or two. The ser-
vice of the synagogue closed before the mid-day meal. At its close
Jesus accepted an invitation to go to the house of Simon and Andrew.
These brothers, as we know, were natives of Bethsaida, and had hith-
erto resided there. But recently they had removed to Capernaum.
Peter having married, and perhaps taken up his abode in the house
of his mother-in-law, James and John were also of the invited guests.
Jesus did not know that the house he went to was one of sickness,
and his ignorance in this respect creates the belief that it was the
first time he had entered it. But soon he hears that the great fever
(it is the physician Luke who in this way describes it) has seized
upon Simon's wife's mother. They tell him of it ; he goes to, bends
kindly over her, takes her by the hand, rebukes the fever. The cure
is instantaneous and complete. She rises, as if no disease had ever
weakened her, with glad and grateful spirit to wait upon Jesus and
the rest. And so within that home kindly hands were provided, like
those of Martha at Bethany, to minister to the Saviour's wants during
the busiest, most toilsome period of his life, when, in season and out
of season, early in the morning and far on often in the night, lie came
and went, living longer under that roof of Peter's house at Caperna-
um, than under any other that sheltered him after his public ministry
had begun. This cure, too, was noised abroad through the city.
Here was an opportunity not to be lost* for who could tell but that
180 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
next morning Jesns will be gone? Though it was the Sabbath,
Jesus had not scrupled to eject the devil and rebuke the fever ; but
the people could not so easily get over their scruples. They wait till
the sun has set before they apply to this new and strange physician.
But meanwhile all that were diseased in Capernaum, and all that
were possessed, were brought. All the city had gathered together
at the door of Peter's house. The sun goes down, and Jesus steps
out into that bustling, anxious crowd ; he lays his hand on every one
of the diseased (Luke 4 : 40) and heals them, and casts out all the
spirits with his word. The stars would be shining brightly in the
heavens ere the busy blessed work was done, and within a few hours
a city which numbered many thousand inhabitants saw disease of
every kind banished from its borders.
After the excitement and fatigue of such a day, Jesus may lay his
head peacefully on his pillow, and take the rest that such labor has
earned. But long before the others — while yet they are all sleeping
in Simon's house around him — rising up a great while before day, he
goes out into a solitary place to pray. Was it on his own account
that Jesus thus retired? Was his spirit too much under the dis-
tracting influence which such a scene of bustle and excitement as he
had passed through the day before, was fitted to exert ? Did he feel
the need to calm the inward tumult by silent and solitary communion
with heaven? As we follow his footsteps, let us be careful to notice
and to remember in what circumstances it was that Christ resorted to
special, solitary, continued prayer. But in leaving Capernaum, alone
and so early, Jesus had in view the state of others as well as his own.
He was well aware how apt, in his case, the office of the healer, the
wonder-worker, was to overshadow that of the teacher, the preacher
of the glad tidings ; how ready the inhabitants of Capernaum already
were to hail and honor him in this one character, however little they
might be disposed to regard or obey him in the other. He had done
enough of that one kind of work, had got enough of that one kind of
homage, there. And so, when, after an eager search for him, he is
found — and Simon and the disciples tell him that all men were seek-
ing for him, and the people when they came up entreat him that he
should not depart from them (compare Mark 1 : 36, 38, and Luke
4:42, 43) — Jesus says to the one, "Let us go into the next towns,
that I may preach there also;" and to the other, "I must preach the
kingdom of God to other cities also, for therefore am I sent." He
did not, indeed, forsake the city that had treated him so differently
from his own Nazareth. He chose it as the place of his most fre-
quent residence, the centre of his manifold labors, the scene of many
FIRST CIRCUIT OF GALILEE. 181
of his most memorable discourses and miracles. But now he must
not rest on the favor which the healings of this wonderful day have
won for him. And for a time he left Capernaum, and "went about
all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel
of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner
of disease among the people. And his fame went throughout all
Syria : and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken
with divers diseases and torments, and those which were possessed
with devils, and those which were lunatic, and those that had the
palsy; and he healed them. And there followed him great multi-
tudes of people from Galilee, and from Decapolis, and from Jerusa-
lem, and from Judea, and from beyond Jordan." Matt. 4 : 23-25.
We read of nine departures from and returns to Capernaum in
the course of the eighteen months of our Lord's Galilean ministry;
of three extensive tours through all the towns and villages of the dis-
trict like the one now described ; and of five or six more limited ones.
Had the three evangelists not been so sparing in their notices of
time and place ; had they not often shown such entire disregard to
the mere order of time, in order to bring together incidents or dis-
courses which were alike in character; could we have traced, as w€
cannot do, the footsteps of our Saviour from place to place, from
month to month, as he set forth on these missionary rounds through
Galilee, made, let us remember, all on foot, we should have had a
year and a half before us of varied and almost unceasing toil, the
crowded activities of which would have filled us with wonder. As it
is, a general conception of how these months were spent is all that
we can reach. To give distinctness to that conception, let us remem-
ber what, in extent of surface and in the character and numbers of
its population, that district of country was to which these pedestrian
journeys of our Saviour were confined.
Galilee, the most northern of the three divisions of Palestine, is
between fifty and sixty miles in length, and from thirty to forty in
breadth. A three-days' easy walk would take you from Nain, on the
south, to Caesarea Philippi in the north.— which seem to have been
the limits in these directions of our Saviour's circuits. Less than two
days' travel will carry you from the shores of the sea of Galilee to the
coasts of Tyre and Sidon. Galilee presented thus an area somewhat
larger than Lancashire and somewhat smaller than Yorkshire. So
far, therefore, as the mere distances were concerned, it would not
take long — not more than a week or two — to travel round and through
it. But then in the Saviour's days it was more densely populated
than either of the English counties I have named. Josephus, who
182 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
knew it well, speaks of 204 towns and villages, the smallest of them
containing above 15,000 inhabitants. Making an allowance for exag-
geration, the population of the province must have been about three
millions — as crowded a population as any manufacturing district in
any of the western kingdoms of Europe now presents. And this pop-
ulation was of a very mixed character. If the majority were of Jew-
ish descent, there were so many Phoenicians, Syrians, Arabs, Greeks,
and others mingled with them, that we may be almost certain that
Jesus never addressed any large assembly in which there were not
Gentiles as well as Jews. There cannot be a greater mistake than to
imagine that, in selecting Capernaum, on the shores of the lake of
Gennesaret, as his headquarters, and Galilee as his chosen field of
labor, Jesus was retiring from the populous Judea to a remote and
unfrequented region. In those days there was much more life said
bustle in Galilee than in Judea. So far as both the numbers and
character of its population were concerned, it was a much better,
more hopeful theatre for such evangelistic labors as those of Jesus.
The people, though no less national in their spirit, were much less
infected with ecclesiastical prejudice. The seed had thus a better
soil to fall upon. Though a Eoman governor was placed over them,
the scribes and Pharisees had great power in Jerusalem, as they
proved in effecting the crucifixion. Herod Antipas, who ruled over
Galilee, had none of the jealousies of the Jewish Sanhedrim ; and in
point of fact, does not appear till the last to have taken much inter-
est in, or in any way to have interfered with the proceedings of Jesus.
So long as he confined himself to the work of a religious teacher,
Herod had no desire to meddle with his doings ; and even if he had,
Jesus had but to cross the lake of Galilee, to put himself beyond his
power by placing himself under the protection of Philip, the gentlest
and most humane of the Herods.
Well adapted every way as Galilee was for our Lord's peculiar
work — the laying of the first foundations of the Christian faith, a faith
which was to spread over the whole earth — Capernaum was equally
fitted to be the centre whence his labors were to radiate. Looked at
as you find it marked upon the map of Galilee, it does not occupy any
thing like a central position. But looked at in relation to the popu-
lation and to the means of transit, a better centre could not have
been selected. Wherever its site was, it lay on the northwestern shore
of the sea of Galilee, close upon, if not within the plain of Gennesaret.*
* After visiting the ruins of Khan Mineyeh and Tell Hum, the writer had no
hesitation in deciding in favor of the latter as more likely to have been the site r /
Capernaum.
FIRST CIRCUIT OF GALILEE. 18S>
This plain — three miles long and two miles broad — was then dot-
ted with villages teeming with population, and of the most exu-
berant fertility. " One may call the place," says the Jewish histo-
rian, " the ambition of nature, where it forces those plants that are
naturally enemies to one another to agree together; it is a happy
contention of the seasons, as if every one of them laid claim to this
country." While all round its shores the sea of Galilee saw towns
and villages thronged with an agricultural and manufacturing popu-
lation, itself teemed with a kind of wealth that gave large occupation
to the fisherman. How numerous the boats were that once skimmed
its surface, and how large the numbers employed as fishermen, may
be gathered from the fact that in the wars with the Eomans two hun-
dred small vessels were once collected for the only naval action in
which the Jews ever engaged. Remembering that the lake is only
thirteen miles long and fiye or six miles broad, it is not too much,
perhaps, to say that never did so small a sheet of water see so many
keels cutting its surface, or so many human habitations circling round
and shadowing its waves, as did the sea of Galilee in the days of
Jesus Christ.
Now all is silent there ; lonely and most desolate. Till last year,
but a single boat floated upon its waters. On its shores, Tiberias in
ruins and Magdala composed of a few wretched hovels are all that
remain. You may ride round and round the empty beach, and, these
excepted, never meet a human being nor pass a human habitation,
Capernaum, Chorazin, Bethsaida are gone. Here and there yon
stumble over ruins, but none can tell you exactly what they were.
They knew not, those cities of the lake, the clay of their visitation ;
their names and their memory have perished.
«
184 THE LIFE OF CHRIST
OUTLINE STUDIES.
It will be found that Part II, comprising five Studies on Jesus'
main ministry in Galilee, covers the period in which he enjoyed his
greatest popularity. Great crowds constantly thronged him, and he
was most active in deeds of healing and in preaching and teaching.
But apparently our Lord was never misled into supposing that
this movement of the populace formed any secure basis on which to
found his kingdom. Rather its strength would rest in a little band of
chosen men whom he should select and train; and the present Study
shows how he began to choose his apostles and to give them and others
some of the key-notes of the new conception of service to God. He is
indeed causing new and most vital forces to enter into the life of
humanity; and the new wine must have new bottles.
PART II. MAIN MINISTRY IN GALILEE.
Study 6. Special Cases and Controversies and First Apostles.
(1) Power over leprosy and paralysis ._ 185-193
o. The leper's ceremonial uncleanness and exclusion from
society 185, 186
b. A victim's faith in and prayer to Christ 186, 187
c. His instant cure at Christ's touch and word 187, 188
d. Jesus' retirement for prayer 188, 189
e. A paralytic's desire to reach Jesus 189-191
/. He is let down through the roof 191
g. Watchful and hostile observers 191-193
h. The man is forgiven and healed 192, 193
(2) Sabbath controversies 194-203
a. The Sabbath as a memorial in Hebrew Scriptures 194, 195
b. Free from specific injunctions 195, 196
c. Growth of minute rules after the exile 196, 197
d. Jesus purposely wrought cures on the Sabbath to free it
from wrong restrictions 197-199
e. He defends his disciples in plucking the heads of grain on
the Sabbath 199, 200
/. His statement of principles 201, 202
g. Cure of man with withered hand 202, 203
(3) Call of the first candidates for the apostolate 204-213
a. Jesus cannot depend on popular favor 204
b. Therefore he will select and train twelve men 204, 205
c. Call of the first five 205-209
d. Parables showing the new kingdom 210-213
THE MINISTRY IN GALILEE.
I.
The two Healings — The Leper and the Paralytic/
In describing our Lord's first circuit through Galilee, the evange-
list tells us that " they brought unto him all sick people that were
taken with divers diseases and torments, and those which were pos-
sessed with devils, and those which were lunatic, and those that had
the palsy; and he healed them." Matt. 4 :24. How many and how
varied were the cures effected within the course of this first itineracy
of our Lord can only be conceived by remembering how numerous
were the towns and villages through which he passed, and how large
the population with which, one way or other, he was brought into
contact.f Kemembering this, we may believe that within a week or
two after his first departure from Capernaum more healings were
effected than the whole put together, of which any specific record has
been preserved in the four gospels.
There was one form of disease, however, which is not noticed in
St. Matthew's compendious description — a disease peculiar enough
in its own character, bat to which an additional peculiarity attached
from the manner in which it was dealt with by the Mosaic law.
However infectious, however deadly, however incurable, no disease
but one was held to render its victim ceremonially unclean. Such
uncleanness was stamped by the law upon the leper alone. This
strange, creeping, spreading, loathsome, fatal disease appears to have
been selected as the one form of bodily affliction to stand, in the legal
impurity attached to it, and in the penalties visited on that impurity,
as a type of the deep, inward, pervading, corrupting, destroying mal-
ady of sin.
Among the Jews the leper was excommunicated. Cut off from
the congregation of the people, he had to live apart, enjoying only
such society as those afflicted with the same disease could offer. He
« Matt. 8:2-4; Mark 1 : 40^5, 2 : 1-12 ; Luke 5 : 12-26.
t Earlier Years, pp. 181, 182.
186 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
had to bear upon his person the emblems of sorrow and of death ,
had to wear the rent garments which those wore who were weeping
for the dead ; to shave his head and keep it bare as those must do
who had touched the dead — himself the living dead, for whom those
emblems of mourning needed to be assumed. His face half covered,
ho had to go about crying, " Unclean, unclean," to warn all others
off, lest they should come too near to him.
From what we know of the prevalence of this disease, it may
be believed that there were many lepers in Galilee when our Lord
made his first journey through it — gathered here and there into small
and miserable communities. Even among these the tidings of the
wonderful cures that were being effected would circulate, for the
segregation was not so complete as to prevent all intercourse ; and
when these poor exiles from their fellows heard of many being healed
whose complaints were as much beyond all human remedy as theirs,
the hope might spring up in their hearts that the Great Healer's
powers extended even to their case. But which of them had faith
enough to make the trial — to break through the legal fences imposed,
and go into any of the cities in which Jesus was, and throw himself up-
on his sympathy for succor ? One such there was — the first of those
so afflicted who ventured to approach the Lord ; and his case on that
account was selected for special reference by all the three evange-
lists. He came to Jesus " when he was in a certain city." * He had
never seen the Lord before, or seen him only at a distance, among a
crowd. He could have known or heard but little more about him
than what the voice of rumor had proclaimed. Yet so soon as he
recognizes him, see with what reverence he kneels and worships and
falls on his face before him, (Luke 5 : 12,) and hear how he salutes
and pleads, " Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean." Per-
haps Jesus had never seen a man prostrate himself in his presence as
this man did. Certainly, Jesus was never before addressed in words
so few and simple, yet so full of reverence, earnestness, faith, submis-
sion. He called Jesus Lord. Was this the first time that Jesus had
been so addressed? Sir, Eabbi, Master — these were the terms in
which Andrew, and Nathanael, and Nicodemus, and the woman of
Samaria, and the nobleman of Capernaum had addressed him. None
of them had spoken to him as this leper did. If, indeed, the mirac-
ulous draught of fishes by which Peter had been finally summoned
away from his old occupation had already occurred, then it would
* Had the name of that city been given it might have helped to trace the
course that Jesus was taking, but here, as in many other instances, the means of
identification are denied.
THE LEPER AND THE PARALYTIC. 187
be from his lips that this title was first heard coming, when he fell
down at Jesus' feet exclaiming, " Depart from me, for I am a sinful
man, O Lord." That, however, is uncertain ; but though it were
true, how much had Simon to elevate his conception of Christ's char-
acter — how little this leper ! One wonders, indeed, how far he had
got in his idea of who this Jesus — this healer of diseases — was. All
that we can know is that he chose the highest title that he knew of,
and bestowed it on him. " Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst." No hesi-
tation as to the power ; no presumption or dictation as to the will.
Upon that free will, upon that almighty power, he casts himself.
"Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean." Jesus instantly went
forward — went close to him — put forth his hand and touched him.
His disciples hold back ; a strange shuddering sensation passes
through the hearts of the onlookers, for, by the law of Moses, it was
forbidden to touch a leper. He who touched a leper himself became
unclean. Yet at once, without hesitation at the time — without act-
ing afterwards as if he had contracted any defilement or required any
purification — Jesus lays his hand upon one who was " full of leprosy,"
and he says to him, " I will, be thou clean." We lose a little of the
power and majesty of our Saviour's answer in our translation. Two
words were spoken, (eau : KaSaplaQ^n,) the answer, the echo to the
prayer ; two of the very words the man had used taken up and em-
ployed by Jesus in framing his prompt and gracious reply. No petition
that was ever presented to Jesus met with a quicker, more complete,
more satisfactory response. If our Lord's conduct in this instance
was regulated by the principle which we know so often guided it in
the treatment he gave to those who came to him to be cured, great
must have been the faith which was met in such a way. The readiness
which Jesus had displayed to exert his power may partly have been
due to this being the first case of a leper's application to him, and to
his desire to show that no legal barrier would be allowed by him to
stand in the way of his stretching forth his hand to heal all that
were diseased. Yet, the manner and the speech of the leper himself
attest that he approached with no ordinary reverence, and petitioned
with no ordinary faith. And, according to his faith, it was done
unto him immediately. As soon as the words, "I will, be thou
clean," had come from the Saviour's lips, "the leprosy departed
from him, and he was cleansed."
Did any further colloquy take place between the healed and (he
Healer? When, quick as lightning, through the frame the sensatior
passed of an entirely recovered health — when he stood up before the
Lord, not a sign or symptom of the banished leprosy on his person—
188 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
did no thanks burst from his grateful lips? or did our Lord say
nothing to him about another healing which he was both willing and
able to effect ? We are not to infer that nothing of the kind occur-
red because nothing is recorded. The evangelists have preserved
alone the fact that, whatever words may have passed between them,
Jesus was in haste to send the leper away, and in doing so gave him
strict command to tell no man, but to go instantly and show himself
to the priest, and offer the gifts that Moses commanded — the live
birds and the cedar wood, and the scarlet and the hyssop — the means
and instruments by which the purification of one declared free of
leprosy was to be effected, and, relieved from the ban that had been
laid upon him, he was to be reinstated in the possession of all the
common privileges of society and citizenship. It is quite possible
that, knowing the opposition which was already kindling against him,
of which we shall presently see traces, Jesus may have desired that,
without throwing out any hint of what had occurred which might
precede him by the way and prejudice the judge, this man should
repair as quickly as possible to the priest upon whom it devolved
judioially to declare that he, so recently a man full of leprosy, was
now entirely free of the complaint. It would be a testimony they
could not well gainsay, if the fact of the departure of the leprosy were
attested by the acceptance of the offerer's gifts and his readmission
into the congregation of Israel. To prevent any possibility of this
ratification of the reality of the cure being refused, Jesus might have
enjoined silence and as speedy a resort as possible to the priest; the
silence in such circumstances and with such a view prescribed, to last
only till the desired end was gained. It would seem, however, from
the result, that a more immediate object of the Saviour in laying this
injunction upon the leper was to prevent the influx of a still greater
crowd than that which was already oppressing him, and thus the
hampering of his movements, and the absorption of too much of his
time in the mere work of healing. For straightway, though charged
to keep silence, the man when he went from Jesus could not restrain
himself, but "began to publish it much, and to blaze abroad the mat-
ter, insomuch that great multitudes came together to be healed of
their infirmities, and Jesus could no more openly enter into the city,
but was without in desert places, and withdrew himself into the wil-
derness, and prayed." Mark 1:45; Luke 5: 15, 16.
Again, a second time, as it was after that busy Sabbath in Caper-
naum, and before his first journey through Galilee, so now, at the
close of this circuit and under the pressure of the multitude that beset
hi3 path, Jesus is driven forth from the city's crowded haunts to seek
THE LEPEE AND THE PARALYTIC. 189
the solitary place, where for some hours at least he may enjoy un-
broken communion with heaven. To watch how and when it was
that he took refuge thus in prayer, mingling devotion with activity,
the days of bustle with the hours of quiet, intercourse with man in
fellowship with God, let this be one of our cherished employments,
following the earthly footsteps of our Lord : for nothing is more fitted
to impress upon us the lesson — how needful, how serviceable it is, ii
we would walk and work rightly among or for others around us, that
we be often alone with our Father which is in heaven. A life ail
action will be as bad for our own soul as a life all prayer would be
profitless for others. It is the right and happy blending, each in its
due proportion, of stillness and of action, of work and prayer, which
promotes true spiritual health and growth ; and the weaker we are —
the more easily at once distracted and absorbed by much bustling
activity — so much the more of reflection, retirement, and devotion is
needed to temper our spirit aright, and to keep it in harmony with
that of our Lord and Master.
It is as impossible to tell how long a time it took to make the
first round of the Galilean towns and villages, as it is to define the
line or circle along which Jesus moved. One high authority* con-
cludes that it must have occupied between two and three months;
another,! that it did not occupy more than four or five days. A
period of intermediate length would probably be nearer the truth
than either. On completing the circuit he returned to Capernaum,
to take up his abode again in Peter's house. No rest was given him.
The news of his return passed rapidly through the town, and straight-
way so many were gathered together "that there was no room to
receive them, no, not so much as about the door." We must remem-
ber here, in order to understand what followed, the form of a Jewish
house, and the materials of which its roof was ordinarily composed.
There is not now, and there never seems to have been, much variety
in the shape of Syrian dwelling-houses. Externally they all present
the one dull uniform appearance of so many cubes or squares, seldom
more than one story high — the outer walls showing no windows, nor
any opening on the level of the ground except the door. On entering
you pass through a lesser court, into which alone strangers are admit-
ted, and then into the inner uncovered square into which the differ
ent apartments of the building open. In one corner, either of the
outer or inner court — generally in the latter — there is a flight of steps
conducting to the roof, a place of frequent resort at all times, and in
the hotter months of summer turned into the sleeping-place of th6
chosen to stand in closest rehitionship to his Master. "Fear not,"
said Jesus to him: "from henceforth thou shalt catch men.' 1
208 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
The words of direction, assurance, promise, addressed in the first
instance to Peter alone, were soon repeated to his three associates.
The shore was reached, the boats hauled up, the fish disposed of, Jameg
and John had carried the broken nets away to a little distance to mend
them, when first to the one pair of brothers, and then to the other,
Jesus said, "Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men." And
immediately they left boats and nets, and two of them their father, and
forsook all, and followed him. We may think it was not much that
they had to leave, bu! it was their all; and the promptness and en-
tireness of their relinquishment of it shows what power over them
the Saviour had already got — what a readiness for service and for
sacrifice was already in them. And these were the four men who
ever after stood most closely associated with Jesus— the four who
stand at the head of every list of the twelve apostles.
It was not indeed till some time after this that along with the
other eight, they were set apart to the peculiar office of the aposto-
late. This calling of them away from their former avocations, this
attaching of them permanently to his person, was a marked step tow-
ard their instalment in that position. It was the same with Matthew,
the publican. The high road from Damascus southward to Judea
and Egypt ran from the slopes of Mount Hermon down to the north-
ern extremity of the sea of Galilee, and for a short distance skirted
along the northwestern shore of the lake, passing through Caper-
naum. On the side of this road, close to the lake, stood the booth
in which Matthew sat levying the toll on the passengers and their
goods. He was one of a hated and degraded class. The payment
of the taxes exacted by the foreigners under whose rule they were,
irritated to the last degree the Jews, who regarded it as a visible sign
and token of their bondage. The strong feeding thus excited spent
itself on all who had any thing to do with the collection of these
taxes. No Jew who desired to stand well with his fellow-countrymen
would be a tax-gatherer. The office was commonly held by foreign-
ers, or by those who cared but little for a purely Jewish reputation.
Matthew was a Jew, yet he had become a publican, and now he is
sit ting at the receipt of custom as Jesus passed by. We know noth-
ing of his personal character or previous habits. Considering that a
year at least had passed since Jesus had first appeared as a public
teacher in Galilee — that so prominent a part of his ministry had been
conducted in the very neighborhood in which Matthew lived — it may
be regarded as a violent supposition that there had been no previous
acquaintance and intercourse between him and our Lord. It would
be more in keeping with Christ's conduct in other instances to imag-
THE CALLING TO THE APOSTOLATE. 209
ine that, so far as his occupation had permitted, Matthew had already
appeared as the follower of the new teacher, had shown himself to
have been favorably affected towards him. However it was. Jesus saw
in him a man who, under right teaching and training, would be wel]
suited for the high office he intended to confer upon him; and so,
despite of the invidious office he now held, Jesus stopped as he
passed by — said, "Follow me;" and "he left all, rose up, and followed
him," throwing up thus a lucrative engagement, and casting in his
lot with the small but growing band which Jesus was forming.
So soon as it was known that a publican had not only been seen
in the following of Jesus — which might have occurred and occasioned
no remark — but that Jesus had actually selected a publican and invi-
ted him to become one of his immediate attendants, a great commo-
tion among the scribes and Pharisees arose. It was a public scandal,
an offence against all propriety, that one pretending to be a religious
guide of the people — one preaching the Kingdom of God — should call
a publican to his side, and take him into his confidence. Bad enough
that he should himself be seen breaking the Sabbath and encouraging
his disciples to do so likewise; but to pass by all the respectable
inhabitants of Capernaum — so many of whom were conspicuous for
the strictness of their observance of all the Jewish ordinances — and
to confer such a mark of favor upon a man with whom none of them
would associate — what was to be thought of such an act? But the
worst had not yet come. Either instantly upon his throwing up his
office, or a few days thereafter, this Matthew makes a feast — a farewell
one, it would seem — to which a number of his old friends and associ-
ates were invited, and there Jesus and his disciples were to be seen
sitting among the other guests. The Pharisees could not stand this.
They did not venture, indeed, to go and openly reproach Christ per-
sonally with it. They were smarting too keenly under the recent
rebuke they had got from him to have courage to do so ; but they go to
his disciples, and they say to them, "Why eateth your Master with pub-
licans and sinners?" Jesus does not leave it to the disciples to reply.
As in so many other instances, he takes the matter into his own
hands, and, half in irony, half in earnest, he says to them, " They that
be whole need not a physician, but they that be sick." They thought
themselves the hale and healthy ; they spake of these publicans and
sinners as corrupt and diseased; why, then, blame him if he, as the
great Physician, went where his services were most required? It was
shiners, not the righteous, that he came to call to repentance. If
they needed no repentance, why blame him if he went to call those
whose ears were open to his entreaties? But were they, indeed, so
Life of GbrUt 14
210 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
much better than those whom they despised? The difference be-
tween them was far more an outward, a ceremonial, than an inward,
a moral, a spiritual one. Many of these poor publicans and sin-
ners — excommunicated though they might be — very careless about
religious riles — were men of simpler, truer, more honest natures,
kindlier in their dispositions, and in a sense, too, more devout, thar
many of these pretentious pietists. "Go," said Jesus to those who
imagined themselves to be righteous and despised others — "Go, and
learn what that meaneth : I will have mercy and not sacrifice " —
mercy rather than sacrifice if the two be put in comparison; mercy
alone, and no sacrifice, if the two are put in opposition — mercy among
publicans and sinners rather than sacrifice or any amount of cere-
monial observances among scribes and Pharisees.
But now another class interferes, to make common cause witb
the Pharisees. Some of the disciples of John the Baptist had early
seen the superiority of Jesus, and at their master's own instance had
enrolled themselves among his followers. But others stood aloof,
having more in them of the old Judaic spirit — attracted as much by
the ascetic habits of the Baptist as by any thing about him — recog-
nizing in the fasts that he kept, the prayers that he himself offered
and taught his disciples to offer, a return to a still purer and stricter
piety than even that which the Pharisees practised. It was a strange
and repulsive thing to such, at the very hour when their master was
cast into prison and they were mourning and fasting more than
usual on this account, to see Jesus and his disciples going about eat-
ing and drinking — nay, accepting invitations to festive entertainments
in publicans' houses. St. Matthew tells us that these disciples of
John went at once to Jesus with their complaint. St. Mark com-
pletes the picture by informing us that the Pharisees joined in the
complaint. Nothing more likely than that when the one saw how
differently the discipleship of Jesus was developing itself from what
they had expected, they should rather fall back upon the austerity
of Pharisaism, with its frequent fastings and many prescribed exer-
cises of devotion — nothing more natural than that the Pharisees
should seize upon the occasion and ally themselves "with the followers
of the Baptist, to aim thereby a fresh blow at Christ's authority and
influence over the people. Christ's answer meets both sets of com-
plainers. " And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bride-
chamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them ? but the
days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and
then shall they fast." Matt. 9 : 15. In the last testimony that the
Baptist had borne to Jesus had he not said, " He that hath the bride
THE CALLING TO THE APOSTOLATE. 211
is the budegroani ; but the friend of the bridegroom, which standetb
and heareth hira, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice."
The position that John had thus claimed for himself, those disciples
against whom the complaint was lodged were now occupying. They
were the friends of the bridegroom — standing and hearing and re-
joicing — was it a time for them to mourn and to fast ? The days
were to come when the bridegroom should be taken away from
them, then should they fast — the fasting flowing spontaneously,
unbidden, from the grief. There is no general command here pre-
scribing fasting, but simply a prophecy, referring to a peculiar and
brief period in the history of the Lord's disciples ; a prophecy, how-
ever, rich in the intimation it conveys that all external acts and exer-
cises, such as that of fasting, should spring naturally out of some
pure and deep emotion of the heart seeking for itself an appropriate
expression.
And now two short parables are added by our Lord : the first we
may regard as peculiarly applicable to the disciples of John, the
other to the Pharisees. "No man putteth a piece of new cloth
unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from
the garment, and the rent is made worse." Matt. 9:16. No man
would take a piece of new raw cloth, which would not keep its form
afterwards, which, when wet, would shrink, and sew it into the mut
oi an old garment ; for ere long, when the new piece put in con-
tracted, it would tear itself away from the old, and the rent would be
made worse. And let not the disciples of the Baptist think that this
new piece of their master's asceticism, with its new fastings and new
prayers, was to be sewed, as they seemed to wish to do, into the old,
wornout, rent garment of Pharisaism. To try that would, be to try
to unite what could not lastingly be conjoined ; instead of closing
up the rent, it would be to make it wider than ever. "Neither
do men put new wine into old bottles ; else the bottles break, and
the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish : but they put new wine
into new bottles, and both are preserved." Matt. 9:17. No man
taketh old dry withered skin bottles, such as then were used, and
filleth them with new wine ; for the new wine would ferment, expand,
and the bottles be burst, and the wine spilled and lost. And let not
the Pharisees think that the new wine of the kingdom, the fresh
spirit of love to God and man, which Jesus came to breathe into
rf generated humanity, could be safely poured into their old bottles
-into those forms and ceremonies of worship, dry as dust, and brittle
as the thinnest and most withered piece of leather. No, there must
be new bottles for the new wine, bottles that will yield to the pres-
212 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
sure from within, and expand as the fermenting liquid which they
eontain expanded. And such new bottles as were thus required
Jesus was finding — not in priestly men, chained up from childhood
within priestly habits — not in those fixed and rigid Levitical institu-
tions which the long years that had been draining them of their
vitality had been stiffening into an immovable inflexibility : but iu
these fishermen, these publicans — natural, homely, unlearned men,
open to imbibe his spirit in all its richness and expansiveness \
and in those simple forms and institutions of Christianity, which,
cramped by no formal and immutable injunctions, were to be left
free to take such new outward shapes as the indwelling spirit might
mould.
These two homely parables of our Lord, so specially adapted as
they were to the circumstances in which they were uttered — the indi-
viduals to whom they were addressed — do they not carry with them
a lesson to all times and ages of Christianity? Do they not remind
us of the absolute incompatibility of the legal and the evangelical
obedience — the spirit of the law and the spirit of the gospel ? There
is a religion, of which the Pharisaism of Christ's days was an exag-
gerated specimen — the very heart and soul of which consists in pen-
ances and prayers and fastings — in worship offered, in duties done,
in sacrifices made, in mortifications inflicted and endured — all to
soothe an agitated conscience, to win a peace with God, to eke out ft
hope of heaven. To this the faith that is in Christ our Saviout
stands directly and diametrically opposed — the one offering as a free
gift what the other toils after as a reward; the one inviting us to
begin where the other would have us end; the one putting forgive-
ness and acceptance with God in our hand and calling upon us, in
the free spirit of his redeemed, forgiven, adopted children, to live
and serve and in all things lo submit to our Father which is in
heaven— the other holding out the forgiveness and the acceptance
away in the distance,, and calling upon us, in the spirit of bondage,
to labor all through life for their attainment; the one the old tattered
garment, the other the piece of new-made cloth.
And the wine of the kingdom, ever as it pours itself afresh from
its fountain-head on high into the spirit of man, is it not a new wine
that needs new bottles to contain it ? If it be indeed the Spirit of
Christ which is working in hearts that have been opened to receive
it, may we not safely leave it to its own operation there, and allow it
to shape the vessel that holds it as it likes? Both, indeed, are
needed — the outward form, the inner spirit; nor will any wise or
thoughtful man rashly touch or mould into different shape the first,
OUTLINE STUDIES. 213
thinking thereby to improve the second; but neither will he hinder
nor hamper the second if, by its own proper motion, it is going on
gently to remould the first.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
The Sermon on the Mount may be said to form the point of transi-
tion from the older order to the new. It is the Magna Charta which
terminates the era of the outward rites and symbols, which show that
the members of the kingdom are being dealt with as children or juniors;
and it ushers in the era of the inward affections and principles, the
ideals and enthusiasms which belong to the adult sons and daughters of
God. It is therefore at the same time a proclamation of freedom and
largeness of life and a requirement of personal loyalty and spirituality.
The Sermon makes no allusion to the priest and rabbi whose offices
have been held so important, and the rite of circumcision, hitherto
counted indispensable to citizenship in the divine commonwealth, is
not even mentioned. Not outward, ceremonial righteousness and
acceptance, but inward humility, good-will, and purity, and con-
sequent blessedness, constitute the gateway into the new fellowship.
Not obedience to written laws, but embodiment of the heavenly Father's
spirit, is the condition of abiding membership in the kingdom of grace
which Christ now establishes.
The leader can emphasize the point that nowhere during his ministry
does the divine authority of Christ stand out more clearly than when
in this great discourse he calls up some of the leading provisions of
the Mosaic law, shows their inadequacy as universal expressions of
God's will, and then reissues them stamped with his own inherent
right to legislate for all mankind through all time in the words solemnly
reiterated with each enactment: "But I say unto you."
This legislation of our Lord covers the large fields of the emotions,
such as anger, and its expression; the element of passion, as capable
of being inflamed through eye and imagination; marriage and divorce;
the gift of speech and its profanation in harmful oaths; quarreling
and revenge, and injuries, as answered by retaliation or overcome by
forgiveness. The whole delineation of a member of the kingdom as
to his character or spirit is then summed up in the statement that he
is to be as complete in showing that love is the dominant principle of
his being as is God the Father in his bearing toward the children of
men.
213a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Having portrayed in strong lines the general character of the
members of his kingdom, Jesus proceeds to mark out the fundamental
features of their practice in their duties toward God and their fellows.
In contrast with the religious leaders of the time, they are to be free
from ostentation in their alms, their prayers, and their fasting. They
are to have such complete faith in God's providential care that they
will be free from unseemly anxiety. They must not judge their fel-
lows, and they are to be discreet in speaking of holy things. They
will be definite and expectant in petitions for God's gifts and follow
the golden rule in their conduct toward others, watchful against false
prophets, and zealous in deeds rather than professions in serving their
Master.
The author points out that no one should consider that Christ is
only a moral legislator because he does not here dwell upon his incar-
nation and coming sacrifice. He speaks here as King, but he is no
less also Saviour.
PART II. MAIN MINISTRY IN GALILEE.
Study 7. Sermon on the Mount.
(1) Features of the situation related to the sermon 2136-215
a. The site is the Horns of Hattin or Mount of the Beatitudes. 2136
6. Christ spends the night in prayer 2136
c. He then chooses his twelve apostles 2136, 214
d. He heals those who are brought to him 214
e. Seated, he gives the sermon 214, 215
(2) The sermon is concerned with the kingdom of God 215-220
a. Qualities that render those blessed who are members of the
kingdom 215, 216
6. The Mosaic law is not subverted but is reissued by Christ
with its moral aims made more universal and spiritual. . 216-218
c. The ideal is likeness in character to God 218
d. Ostentation, anxiety, and judging others are to be avoided. . 218
e. There is to be constant and confident use of prayer 219
/. The golden rule is to govern relations with others 219
g. To be deaf to false prophets and to hear and do Christ's words
is to build on the rock 220
(3) Aspects of the sermon making it effective 220, 221
a. Simplicity 220
6. Authority 220
c. The voice of kingly sacrifice is discernible 221
d. A humble childlike faith in God is manifested 221
e. A lofty ideal of heavenly morality is enforced 221
THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT 2136
IV.
The Sermon on The Mount.*
The traveller from Jerusalem gets his first sight of the sea of Gal-
ilee from the top of Mount Tabor. It is but a small corner of the lake
that he sees, lying miles away, deep sunk among the hills. Descend-
ing from the height whence this first glimpse of the lake is got, the
road to Tiberias leads over an elevated undulating plateau, the one
marked feature of which is a curious double-peaked hill, rising about
fifty or sixty feet above the general level of the surrounding table-
land, and sloping down on its eastern side into the plain of Gennesa-
ret. From the two prominences it presents, this hill is called the
Horns of Hattin — Hattin being a village at its base. It overlooks
the lake and the plain. You see Capernaum from its summit, lying
across the valley about seven miles off. As seen again from Caper-
naum and the plain, it appears as the highest and loneliest elevation
that rises upon that side of the lake. It would naturally be spoken
of by the inhabitants of Capernaum and its neighborhood, even as
St. Matthew speaks of it, as the mountain. It would naturally be the
place to which any one seeking for solitude would retire. When
somewhere in its neighborhood there came around our Lord " a great
multitude of people out of all Judea and Jerusalem, and from the sea-
coast of Tyre and Sidon, and from Galilee and Decapolis, and from
Idumea and from beyond Jordan," (Luke 6 : 17 ; Mark 3:8; Matt.
4 : 25,) and when, seeking relief from the pressure, it is said that he
went up into a mountain, no one so likely to be the one referred to
by the evangelist as the Horns of Hattin — to which, as the supposed
place of their utterance, the name of the Mount of the Beatitudes has
for ages been given.
The night upon this mountain was spent by Christ in prayer —
alone perhaps upon the higher summit, the disciples slumbering be-
low. At dawn he called them to him, and out of them he chose the
twelve and ordained thom, " that they might be with him, and that
ka lixight send them forth to preach." But on what principle was the
selection made? in what manner was the ordination effected? II
* MaLtt. chaps. 5, 6, 7 ; Luke 6 : 20-4-9.
214 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
may be presumed that some regard was had to the personal qualified*
tions of those whom the Lord chose for this high office. We know
indeed too little of any but two or three of the twelve to trace the
special fitness of the human instrument for the work given it to do,
Of all but one, however, we may believe that such fitness did exist
But how came that one to be numbered with the rest? It is possible
that Judas may have done much to obtrude himself, or that others
may have done much to obtrude him upon the notice of the Saviour.
We read of one who, with great professions of attachment, volunteered
to become a disciple, saying to Jesus, " Master, I will follow thee
whithersoever thou goest;" whom Jesus neither rejected nor wel-
comed, meeting his declaration of adherence with the ominous words,
"The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests, but the
Son of man hath not where to lay his head." If, as some have
thought, the man who came forward in this way and pressed himself
into the discipleship was Judas — if he was a man of acknowledged
ability and considerable influence, whom no one at the time had the
slightest reason to suspect, who was welcomed by all the other disci-
ples, and commended by them to their Master as a most desirable
associate — if the rejection of such a man in such circumstances would
have seemed to be an act of caprice without known or apparent rea-
son, this might serve perhaps in some slight degree to explain to us
how Judas came at first to be numbered with the twelve. Many will
feel as if there were something like profanity in any conjecture of this
kind, and all will be satisfied simply to accept the fact that Jesus
chose those twelve men, and yet that one of them was a devil.
Was it by simple designation to the office without any form or
ceremony? or was it by laying of Christ's hand solemnly on the head
of each, then gathering the circle round him and offering up a conse-
cration prayer, that the apostles were set apart ? We cannot tell. It
is surely singular, however, that the manner of the ordination of the
apostles by our Lord himself, in like manner as the ordination of the
first presbyters or bishops of the church by the apostles, should have
been left unnoticed and undescribed.
The ordination over, Jesus descended to a level spot, either be-
tween the two summits or lying at their base. Luke 6 : 17. The day
had now advanced, and the great multitude that had followed him,
apprised of his place of retreat, poured in upon him, bringing their
diseased along with them. He stood for a time healing all who were
brought to him. Retreating then again to the mountain side, he sal
down. His disciples seated themselves immediately around him,
and the great multitude stood or sat upon the level ground below.
THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT. 215
Such were the circumstances under which the Sermon on the
Mount was delivered. It may have been the first discourse of the
kind which St. Matthew had heard ; all the more natural, theret'ore 9
that he should have been directed to preserve so full a record of it.
We have no authority for saying that it was actually the first formal
and lengthened address delivered by our Lord. Many other longer
or shorter discourses, to smaller or larger audiences, may Jesus have
spoken during this period of his ministry. But this was the one
selected by Divine Wisdom to be presented as a specimen or sample
of our Lord's teaching, as addressed to mixed Galilean audiences in
the earlier stages of his ministry. There was a change in his mode
of teaching afterwards, even in Galilee, as there was a marked dif-
ference between all his discourses there and those addressed to very
different audiences in Jerusalem. Here upon the mount he had a
vast concourse of people of all castes and from all quarters before
him. Nearest to him were his own disciples. To them his words
were in the first instance spoken, but they were meant to reach the
consciences and hearts of the motley crowd that lay beyond.
Now, if there was one sentiment spread more widely than another
throughout this crowd, it was the vague yet ardent expectation beat-
ing then in almost every Jewish breast, of some great national deliv-
erance — of the near approach of a new kingdom — the kingdom of
God. Of this kingdom they had no higher conception than that it
would be a free and independent outward and visible Jewish mon-
archy. And when it came, then should come the days of liberty and
peace, of honor and triumph, and all kinds of blessedness for poor
oppressed Judea. With what a delicate hand — not openly and rudely
rebuking, yet laying the axe withal at its very roots — was this deep
national prejudice now treated by our Lord. What could have run
more directly counter to the earthly ambitious hopes, swelling up
within the hearts of those around him? what could have served more
effectually to check them, than the very first words which Jesus
uttered? "Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom
of heaven. Blessed a/re they that mourn : for they shall be comfort-
ed. Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed
are they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness : for they
shall be filled. Blessed are the merciful : for they shall obtain mercy.
Blessed are the pure in heart ; for they shall see God. Blessed are
ihe peacemakers : for they shall be called the children of God. Bless-
ed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake : for theirs is
the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you,
and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you
216 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is
your reward in heaven : for so persecuted they the prophets which
were before you." How different the kind of blessedness thus
described from that which his hearers had been hungering and
thirsting after. How different the kind of kingdom thus described
from that which they had been expecting he would set up. And,
apart from their special use and immediate service as addressed of
old to the Galilean audience, these beatitudes remain to teach us
wherein the only true, pure, lasting blessedness for man consists;
not in any thing outward, not in the gratification of any of our natu-
ral passions or desires, our covetousness, or our pride, or our ambi-
tion, or our love of pleasure; not in what we have, but in what we
are in God's sight and in relation to his empire over our souls. The
poor in spirit, those most deeply conscious of their spiritual poverty,
their want of that which can alone find favor with God ; the mourn-
ers whose grief is the fruit of guilt and unworthiness realized and
deeply felt; the meek, who bow patiently and submissively to every
stroke, whoever be the smiter; the hungerers and thirsters after
righteousness, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, the persecuted for
righteousness' sake — do we regard these as the happiest of our race?
is theirs the kind of happiness upon which our heart is chiefly set,
and which we are laboring with our utmost efforts to realize ? If not,
however ready we may be to extol the pure and high morality of the
Sermon on the Mount, we have failed to take in the first and one of
the greatest truths which it conveys, as to the source, and seat, and
character, and conditions of the only abiding and indestructible
blessedness of sinful man.
But while the multitude were cherishing false ideas and expecta-
tions about his kingdom, many were cherishing false ideas and fears
about Christ himself that equally required to be removed. They had
noticed in his teaching the absence of any reference to many of those
religious services that they had so punctiliously performed, some dis-
regard of them in his own practice and in that of his disciples. " This
man," they began to say, " is an enemy to Moses. He is aiming at
nothing short of a subversion of the old, the heaven-given law."
Jesus must proclaim how untrue the accusation was. " Think not,"
he said, " that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets : I am
not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till
heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from
the law, till all be fulfilled." But in what did the true fulfilment of
the Mosaic law consist ? It was a vast and complicated code, em-
bracing a body of laws for a peculiar people, existing at a particular
THE SEEMON ON THE MOUNT. 217
period, and organised for a special purpose ; subject, therefore, to all
the limitations and exhibiting all the adaptations to existing circum-
stances which, in proportion to the wisdom with which it is framed,
all such legislation must display. It had in it commands of a purely
ethical and religious character, conveyed in more general and abstract
forms ; and it had in it a large apparatus of positive enactments and
ordinances chiefly meant to symbolize the truths and facts of the
Christian dispensation. It was not throughout an expression of
God's absolute will, perfect, immutable, meant to be of permanent and
universal obligation. Part of it, perfectly adapted to its design, was
inherently imperfect; part of it as necessarily transitory. When the
time came that the Jewish nation should either cease to exist or
cease to have its old functions to discharge, and when all its types
and ceremonies had their true meaning expressed and their ends
accomplished; thpn out of this complicated law there would come to
be extracted that which was absolutely perfect and universally oblig-
atory. Jesus knew that at his advent that time had come, and
assuming the very place and exercising the very prerogative of the
divine legislator of the Jews, he begins in this Sermon on the Mount
to execute this task. He treats the old Jewish practice of divorce as
imperfect, being adapted to a single nation at a particular stage of
its moral training, and lays down the original and perfect law of the
marriage relationship. In like manner he deals with the lex lalionis—
the rule of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, and with the
law and custom as to oaths. But it is especially in his treatment of
those commandments about whose permanent obligation there was
and could be no doubt, that the novelty and value of his teaching
displayed itself. These were negative and prohibitory in their form.
" Thou shalt not kill/ ' " Thou shalt not commit adultery," etc. They
had been looked at in the letter rather than in the spirit. They had
been regarded simply as prohibitions of certain outward acts or
crimes. Abstinence from the forbidden deeds had been taken as a
keeping of the Divine commands. Obedience had thus come to be
looked upon as a thing of outward constraint or mechanical con-
formity, its merit lying in the force of the constraint, the exactness of
the conformity. It was thus that the righteousness of the scribes
and Phari^es consisted mainly in a stiff and formal adherence to the
letter of the precept, to the neglect often and sometimes to the con-
tradiction of its spirit. This fatal error Christ exposes, taking up
«ommandmeRt after coinmandineni, unfolding the spirituality and
extent of the requirement, showing how it reached not simply 01
m-ainly to the regulation of the outward conduct, but primarily and
218 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
above all things to ike state of the heart; that murder lay in embryc
in an angry feeling; that adultery lurked in a licentious look; that ii
was not alone when the name of God was vainly used that irrever-
ence might be exhibited and profane swearing practised ; that the
old Jewish rule of retaliation was no rule for the regulation of the
Affections or the guidance of the conduct in a pure and perfect state ;
that from the heart every sentiment of malice or revenge must bo
banished, and in the conduct the evil done to us by another remain
unresented, unavenged, the enemy to be loved, the persecutor to be
prayed for; and all this done that we might be merciful as our Father
that is in heaven is merciful, perfect as he is perfect, children of him
who maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth
his rain on the just and on the unjust.
This end and aim of being like to, of being imitators of God, was
one too pure, too high, too holy, to suffer corruption and the worm
to enter into it by admixture with the selfish and ignoble motive of
courting human approval, winning human applause. Too much of
the almsgiving and the fasting and the praying that he saw practised
around him was done to be seen of men — prompted by no other mo
tive — was nothing but hypocrisy, utterly offensive to his Father in
heaven. Concealed and unostentatious let the givings and the fast-
ings be, short and simple and secret the prayers of those who would
be his disciples and true children of his Father, whom seeing in secret
he would in due time openly reward.
Let all be done as unto him with an undivided allegiance, for no
man can serve two masters : and with an unbounded trust, for, hav-
ing such a Father, why should there be any over-carefulness for
earthly things — those things that He knows we have need of, or any
undue concern about a future which is not ours but his ? Why so
anxious about food and raiment ? It is God who sustains the life of
the body; you must trust him for that, the greater thing: then why
distrust him for the less ? Behold the fowls of the air ; consider the
lilies of the field ; look at the grass that grows beneath your feet.
Not theirs, as yours, the capacity for trust and toil and foresight. A
worthless, fleeting existence theirs as compared with yours ; yet see how
they are not only cared for, but lavishly adorned. " Take,' therefore,
no thought for the morrow : for the morrow shall take thought for
the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof. But
geek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness ; and all these
things shall be added unto you."
Conscious of your own far shortcomings from that perfect confi-
dence you should cherish, that constant service you should be rets-
THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT. 219
dering, be not severe in criticising or condemning others. Judge
not, that ye be not judged. " Why beholdest thou the mote that is
in thy brother's eye, and considerest not the beam that is in thine
own eye ? Thou hypocrite ; first cast out the beam out of thine own
eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy
brother's eye."
It may be very difficult to be all, to do all that I am now telling
you you ought to be and to do ; but is there not an open and effectual
way for having every felt spiritual want relieved ? " Ask, and it shall
be given you ; seek, and ye shall find ; knock, and it shall be opened
unto you." " If ye, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your
children, how much more shall your Father which is in heaven give
good things to them that ask him?"
Drawing from the exhaustless fountain of grace and strength that
in him is opened to you, fear not to adopt this as the one comprehen-
sive rule of your whole bearing and conduct toward others: "All
things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even
so to them ; for this is the law and the prophets."
Bet'ore the days of Christ there was a great Jewish teacher, Hill el.
An inquirer once came to him asking the strange question: "Can you
teach one the whole law during the time that I am able to stand on
one foot?" "Yes," said Hillel, "it is contained in this one rule:
Whatsoever ye would not wish that your neighbor should do to you,
do it not to him." This and other sayings of preceding rabbis have
been quoted with a view of detracting somewhat from the originality
of the moral teaching of Christ. Yet even here, while the resem-
blance between the lessons taught is so marked, one grand difference
maj 7 be discerned — a difference that runs through so large a part of
the Saviour's precepts as compared with those of all other moral legis-
lators. He translates the negative into the positive. With him it is
not — be not, do not ; but, be and do. In few instances are any spe-
cific rules of conduct laid down. To plant the right spirit and motive
in the heart, out of which all true morality proceeds, is the great
object He aims at. 'Look up to God,' he says to us, 'as indeed your
Father — ever living, ever loving, patiently bearing with you, largely
providing for you, willing to forgive you. Walk humbly, meekly, trust-
ingly before him. Commit your way to him, cast all your care on him,
seek all your supplies from him, render all your returns to him. Look
upon all your felloAV-men as children of the same Father, members
of the same family. Love each other, and live together as brethren,
bearing yourselves towards all around you patiently, forgivingly, gen-
erously, hopefully. The gate thus opened is strait, the way is narrow,
220 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
but it is the only one that leadeth unto life. An I, finally, lemembei
that it is practice, not profession, that can alone conduct you along
the path to the throne in heaven. Hear then, and do, that ye may be
like the wise man who built his house upon a rock, "and the rain
descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat upon
that house, and it fell not, for it was founded upon a rock.'"
Such is a rapid, imperfect sketch of the Sermon on the Mount,
regarded mainly from an historical point of view, in its bearings upon
the audience to which it was originally addressed. The people who
first heard it, we are told, were astonished at its doctrine. Well they
might be. It was so different from what they had been accustomed
to. No labored argument, no profound discussion, no doubtful dis-
putation, no nice distinctions, no scheme of doctrines formally and
elaborately propounded, no exact routine of religious services pre-
scribed. It dealt with the simplest, plainest moral and religious
truths and duties; and did this in the simplest, plainest manner;
directly, familiarly, colloquially — a freshness about it like that of the
morning breeze which played over the mountain side. The thing,
however, that seems to have struck the listeners most, was the calm,
unhesitating, authoritative tone in which the whole was uttered.
"They were astonished at his doctrine: for he taught them as one
h aving authority, and not as the scribes." Here is One who comes
forth from none of the great schools — who has sat at the feet of none
of the great masters — who uses no book language — who appeals to
no authority but his own — a young untaught Nazarene ; and yet he
takes it upon him to pronounce with the utmost confidence as to who
the truly blessed are, and reckons among them those who were to be
railed at and persecuted for his sake. Here is One who does not
shrink from taking into his hands the law and the prophets, acting
not simply as their expositor — the clearer of them from all false tra-
ditional interpretations. He is bold enough to say that he came to
fulfil them; in one remarkable instance, at least — that of the law
which permitted divorce — speaking as the original lawgiver was alone
entitled to do, declaring that the time for this permission had now
ceased, and that henceforth such divorces as Moses had tolerated
were not to be allowed. Here is One who speaks of God as one who
fully knew and had a right to declare how his children were to act so
as to please him ; whom he would forgive, whom he would reward,
upon whom he would bestow his gifts. Here is One who, though
seated on that Galilean mountain, with nothing to distinguish him
from the humble fishermen around him, speaks of a day on which he
should be seated on the throne of universal judgment, to whom many
THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT 221
should say, " Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name ? and
in thy name have cast out devils ? and in thy name done many won-
derful works?" — to whom he was to reply, "I never knew you: depart
from me, ye that work iniquity."
In consequence of the simplicity, purity, and elevation of the
moral precepts which it contains, and still more, perhaps, because of
none of the peculiar doctrines as to the person, character, office, and
work of Christ as the Mediator being found in it, this Sermon on the
Mount has been greedily seized upon and highly extolled by many as
the true epitome of Christianity — as Christ's own gospel coming from
his own lips. But it is far less difficult for us to discern the reasons
why the truths of the incarnation and the propitiatory sacrifice were
not at this time and to that audience alluded to or dwelt upon by
Jesus, than it is for any who would reduce him to the level of a mere
moral legislator to account for the position which, even when enunci-
ating the simplest moral precepts, he assumed — for the tone of author-
ity in which he speaks. Dimly, indeed, through this Sermon on the
Mount does the Jesus of the cross appear, but the Jesus of the throne
is here, and once that we have learned from other after-teachings of
himself and his apostles to know and love and trust in him as our
great High Priest, who has bought us with his blood, it will be the
habit and delight of every true and faithful follower of his to take up
and dwell upon that wonderful discourse, in which, more clearly and
fully than in any other words of human speech, the very spirit and
essence of a humble, child-like faith in God, and the lofty ideal of a
perfect, a heavenly morality, are unfolded and enforced.
221a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
The present Study embraces an unusual number of events in our
Lord's public ministry. Two out of his three recorded cases of raising
the dead are covered, and the idea is unfolded by Dr. Hanna, on page
227, that these two along with the case of Lazarus form a series as to
the time elapsing between the expiration of life and its restoration.
In this study the growing opposition of the Pharisees to Christ
as working miracles and kindling the faith of the people reaches a crisis.
They seek to charge him before the people with performing his work
of casting out devils through Beelzebub the prince of the devils; and
he, on the other hand, proves that such an explanation is impossible,
and warns his enemies that they are in danger of committing an unpar-
donable sin.
It is here also that the family of Christ seek an interview with him
apparently as if they would try to restrain him, and that he makes the
declaration that whosoever does the will of his Father in heaven is
his brother and sister and mother.
During this period, Christ introduces his new method of teaching
in parables which has the twofold advantage of concealing the inner
message from those who are hostile to the truth and of revealing it
to those who welcome it as friends.
PART II. MAIN MINISTRY IN GALILEE.
Study 8. More Miracles and Beginning of Parables.
(1) Raising the widow's son 2216-230
a. Journey from Capernaum to Nain 222
b. Christ's compassion and deed of power 222, 223
c. General considerations on the event 227-230
(2) Healing of woman with issue of blood 224, 225
a. Her desire to be secretly healed and touching of Christ's
garment 224
b. Christ causes her to acknowledge her cure and comforts her. . 224, 225
(3) Raising of Jairus' daughter 223-230
a. Jesus responds to the call of Jairus 223-226
b. Peter, James, John, and parents as witnesses 226
c. The maiden is restored to lif e 226
d. General consideration on three cases of resurrection 227-230
THE RAISING OF THE WIDOW'S SON. 2216
(4) Embassy from John the Baptist 230-233
a. Reasons why John should feel a measure of doubt 230-231
b. Christ's answer and subsequent tribute to John 231-233
(5) Woes incurred by cities in rejecting Christ's ministry 234-236
(6) Invitation to come unto him and find rest j. 236-242
(7) Simon the Pharisee and the sinful woman 243-250
a. Christ dining with Simon is anointed by the woman 243-245
b. Christ's parable of the two debtors, and words to Simon and
the woman 246-250
(8) Increasing opposition of the Pharisees to Jesus 250-255
a. They claim he casts out devils through Beelzebub 250-252
b. Jesus answers their charge and warns them 252-255
(9) Christ's mother and brethren seek to interpose 255, 256
(10) Introduction of Christ's teaching in parables 257-261
a. Parables of the sower, the wheat and tares, the mustard-
seed, the leaven, and the seed growing secretly 258
b. Parables of the hidden treasure, the pearl of great price, and
the draw-net, spoken later 261
c. General purpose in the use of parables 258-261
(11) Christ stills the tempest in crossing the Sea of Galilee 261-263
(12) Cure of the demoniac 263-267
a. Jesus confronts this desperate case on the eastern shore and
casts out the evil spirits 263
b. They enter into the herd of swine and work its destruction .... 264
c. The mysterious conflict between good and evil 264-267
The Raising of the Widow's Son and the Ruler's
Daughter.*
The multitude that listened to the Sermon on the Mount followed
Jesus from the hill-side into Capernaum, thronging round the house
into which he entered, and pressing their sick so urgently on his
notice that he " could not so much as eat bread." A mode of life
like this — out all night upon the mountain-top, teaching, walking,
working all day long without food or rest — so affected the minds of
his immediate relatives when they heard of it, that they " went out
* Luke 7 : 11-17 ; 8 : 41-^6 ; Matt. 9 : 18-26 ; Mark 5 : 22-43.
222 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to lay liold of him, for they said, He is beside himself." Failing in
their endeavors, tliey left him to pursue his eccentric course.
It was in the course of the busy day which followed the delivery
of the Sermon on the Mount that the centurion's servant was healed,
and the opportunity was thereby given to Jesus to hold up to the
eyes of the people an example of such faith as he had not found —
no, uot in Israel. On the following day he left Capernaum. " Many
of his disciples and much people " went with him. They had a long
day's walk over the hills of Galilee, skirting the base of Tabor, and
descending into the plain of Esdraelon. The sun was sinking in the
west, away behind the ridge of Carmel, and was gilding with his
evening beams the slopes of little Hermon, as Jesus and the band
which followed him approached the village of Nain. This village is
now a confused heap of the rudest Syrian huts, unenclosed, with no
ruins of ancient buildings, nor any antiquities around, save the tombs
in the rock upon the hill-side, where for ages they have buried
the dead. And yet it stands next to Nazareth and Bethlehem and
Bethany in the sacred interest attached to it. We are so sure of its
identity, it is so small, so isolated, having nothing but the one won-
derful incident to mark its history, that the Saviour's living presence
was almost as vividly realized by us when entering it as when we sat
by the side of Jacob's well. We stood at the end of the village
which looks northward towards Galilee, and tried to recall the scene.
Jesus and his train of followers have crossed the plain, and are draw-
ing near to the village. Another company moves slowly and sadly
out of its gate and meets them. It is a funeral procession ; a large
one, for all the villagers have come forth ; but there is no mark or
token that it is the funeral of one who had been rich or in any way
distinguished. The bier is of the plainest, and there follows it as
chief mourner a solitary woman, clad in humblest guise. Jesus has
none beside him, as he stops and looks, to tell him who this woman
is — who the dead for whom she mourns. He does not need the
information ; he knows her history ; he knows her grief better than
any inhabitant of Nain. To his eye it is a becoming and beautiful
thing that grief like hers should have such homage paid to it, should
have drawn the whole village out after her by the pure force of sym-
pathy. Her claim, indeed, upon that sympathy is strong. This is
not the first bier she has followed. She had wept for another before
she wept for him whom they are now carrying to the grave. She is
<* widow — weeping now behind the bier of her only son. Bereft of
every earthly stay she walks, a picture of perfect desolation.
" And when the Lord saw her he had compassion on her." As
THE RAISING OF THE WIDOW'S SON. 223
soon as his eye rests on her his heart fills full of pity. Was this
the first funeral he had ever met by the wayside along with his dis-
ciples ? Was this the first mourner he had ever noticed go weeping
thus behind the dead ? It may not have been so ; yet never perhaps
before had he seen a poor lone widowed mother shed such bitter
tears over the death of an only son. The sight moves him at leas!
to do what he had never done before. He goes up to the woman, and
says to her " Weep not." Wrapped up in her consuming grief, how
surprised she must have been at being accosted in such a way at
such a time. Does this stranger mean to mock her, to deal rudely
with her in her grief. In any other she might have been ready to
repel and resent the unseasonable intrusion — the strange unreason-
able speech ; but there is something in the loving, pitying eye that
looks at her as she glances at him timidly through her tears — some-
thing of hope, of promise, of assurance in the gentle yet authorita-
tive tones of his voice that quenches all disposition to repel or
resent. But why does Christ first say to her, " Weep not" ? Does he
not know what he is about to do ? Does he not know that within a
few minutes that will be done by him which, without any bidding on
his part, will dry up all her tears ? He does ; but he cannot go for-
ward to his great act without yielding to the impulse of pity ; drop-
ping into the ear of the mourner, not as a cold word of command,
fitted only to give needless pain, but as a spontaneous expression of
his warm personal compassion — the words, "Weep not." Such a
preface to the miracle speaks to us as plainly of the tenderness of
Christ's sympathy as the miracle itself proclaims the infinitude of his
power.
" And he came and touched the bier, and they that bore him stood
still." And all stand as still as the bearers ; the two groups, the one
from Capernaum and the other from Nain, lost in wonder as to what is
to happen next. All eyes turn upon Jesus. His turn upon the bier.
The silence is broken by the simple majestic words, " Young man, I
say unto thee, Arise." The young man rises, looks about -with won-
der, and begins to speak. Jesus takes him by the hand, lifts him
from the bier, delivers him to his mother. The deed of mercy is
done, and nothing more is told, but that a great fear came upon
all. "And they glorified God, saying, That a great prophet is
risen up among us ; and, That God hath visited his people. And
this rumor of him went forth throughout all Judea, and throughout
all the region round about."
It was a few days or weeks before or after this incident (for the
date is uncertain) that one of the rulers of the synagogue at Capev-
THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
nauni, Jairus by name, came to Jesus as lie sat at meat in the house
of Levi, and " cast himself at his feet, and worshipped him, and be-
sought him greatly, saying, My little daughter lieth at the point oi
death; come and lay thy hands upon her, that she may be healed,
and she shall live." Jesus arose at once and went with Jairus ; so
did his disciples, and so did much people; the very promptness of
Christ's compliance with the ruler's request stimulating their curios-
ity. The distance could not have been great from the house of Levi
to that of Jairus, and might have speedily been traversed, but the
crowd that thronged around Jesus by the way somewhat impeded
the movement. It gave, however, to one poor woman the opportu-
nity she had long been seeking. Twelve long years she had been f\
sufferer, her illness one that made her very touch pollution. All she
had she had spent upon physicians. It seemed rather to have aggra-
vated her complaint. Seeing or hearing about Jesus, a belief in the
healing virtue that lay in him had taken possession of her mind.
Her timidity, her sense of shame, kept her from going openly to him,
telling him of her malady, and asking him to exert his power on her
behalf. But if she could in any way unseen get at him, if she could
but touch his clothes, she felt that she should be made whole. And
now he goes through this great crowd. It is the very occasion she
has been seeking f®r, and she seizes it; gets behind him, presses
through the people, and touches the hem of his outer garment. She
is instantly healed, but as instantly arrested. The touch has scarce
been given, the healing scarce effected, when Jesus turns round and
says, "Who touched my clothes?" They all deny the deed. Peter
expostulates with his Master. "The multitude," he says, "throng
thee and press thee, and sayest thou, Who touched me?" Jesus
knows as well as Peter that many had been near enough for their and
his garments to have come into contact; but he knows, too, as Peter
knew not, that there had been a touch with a distinct, deliberate pur-
pose, altogether different from that of a mere random contact, a touch
that had drawn virtue out of him. Who gave it? His eye looked
round to see, is already resting on the woman, who, seeing that she
is not hid, fearing and trembling, yet glad and grateful, throws her-
self on her knees before him, and getting the better of all her
womanly feelings, declares unto him "before all the people for what
r kin-
dred. A bond stronger than all others bound him to his deliverer.
When he saw Jesus make the movement to depart, he accompanied
him to the shore, he went with him to the boat. And as he fell there
at his feet, we can almost fancy him taking up Ruth's words, and say-
ing, " Entreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after
thee : for whither thou goest, I will go ; and where thou lodgest, I
will lodge ; thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God."
He is ready, he is anxious to forsake all and follow Jesus, but he is
not permitU/d. "Go home to thine own house and to thy friends,"
said Jesus to him, " and tell them how great things the Lord hath
done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee." It was to a hea-
then home, to friends that knew little about the Lord, and cared little
for such knowledge, to whom he was to go. No small trial to be torn
thus from the Saviour's side, to go and reside daily among those who
had sent that Saviour away from them. But he did it — did more
even than he was told to do ; not in his own house alone, nor among
his own friends alone, but throughout the whole Gentile district of
Decapolis he published abroad the great things that Jesus had done
for him. Better for the man himself, too long accustomed to dwell
alone, taking a tincture of the solitary places in which he dwelt into
his own spirit, to mix thus freely and widely with his fellow-men;
and better undoubtedly it was for those among whom he lived, acting
as the representative of him whom in person they had rejected, but
who seem to have lent a more willing ear to the man of their own
district and kindred, for we are told that as he spake of Jesus, " all
men did marvel," and some, let us hope, did believe.
Let one closing glance be given at the strange picture which this
passage in our Saviour's life presents. It abounds in lights and shad-
ows, in striking contrasts — the meanest selfishness confronted with
the purest, noblest love. Reckless frenzy, abject terror, profound
attention, devoted attachment, rapidly succeed each other in him
who, brought into closest union with the highest and the lowest of
the powers of the spiritual world, presents to us a condensed epitome
of the great conflict between good and evil — between Christ and
Satan — in the domain of the human spirit. Undoubtedly it standi?
the most remarkable instance of dispossession in the gospel narra-
tive, revealing to us at once the depth of that degradation to which
our poor humanity may sink, and the height of that elevation to
which, through the power and infinite compassion of the Saviour, it
may be raised. Was it for the purpose of teaching us more mani-
festly that Jesus came to destroy the works of the devil, that in that
THE DEMONIAC OF GADAKA. 267
age of His appearance devils were permitted to exercise such strange
dominion over men ? Was it to bring into visible and personal col-
lision tlie heads of the two opposite spiritual communities— -the
Prince of Light and the prince of darkness — and to make more visible
to all men the supremacy of the one over the other? Was it that, a^
the Sun of righteousness rose in one quarter of the heavens, \\\ ■ >n
the opposite a cloud of unwonted blackness and darkness was allowed
to gather, that with all the greater brightness there might shine forth
the bow of promise for our race? Whatever be the explanation, the
fact lies before us that demoniacal possessions did then take place,
and were not continued. But though the spirits of evil are not
allowed in that particular manner to occupy and torment and degrade
us, have they been withdrawn from all access to and all influence
over our souls ? With so many hints given us in the Holy Scriptures
that we wrestle not with flesh and blood alone, but with angels and
principalities and powers of darkness ; that there are devices of Satan
of which it becomes us not to remain ignorant ; that the great adver-
sary goeth about seeking whom he may devour; with the command
laid upon us, " Eesist the devil, and he will flee from you ;" with the
promise given, " The Lord shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly;"
are we not warranted to believe, and should we not be ever acting on
the conviction, that our souls are the sphere of an unseen conflict, in
which rival spirits are struggling for mastery ? When some light-
winged fancy carries off the seed of the word as it drops in our soul,
may not that fancy have come at Satan's call, and be doing Satan's
work ? When the pleasures and honors and riches of this world are
invested with a false and seductive splendor, and we are tempted to
pursue them as our chief good, may he not have a hand in our temp-
tation who held out the kingdoms of this world and all the glory of
them before the Saviour's eye ? But however it may be with evil
spirits, we know that evil passions have their haunt and home within
our hearts. These, as a strong man armed, keep the house till the
stronger than they appears. That stronger one is Christ. To him let
us bring our souls ; and if it please him to bid any unclean spirit go
forth, at his feet let us be sitting, and may he make us willing, what-
ever our own desire might be, to go wherever he would have us go,
asid do whatever he would have us do.
:67a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
This lesson leads up to the great climax or crisis in the ministry
of our Lord before the Passion Week. Up to the point where he sends
the multitude away after feeding the five thousand and where he
gives this discourse in the synagogue in Capernaum his influence and
popularity with the masses had been steadily growing. Apparently
greater numbers were constantly coming to believe in him and the
occasions were increasing when expressions were used that pointed to
the recognition of him as the Messiah.
It is one of the clearest proofs of his heavenly discernment and
divine poise that Christ was not betrayed into the least unwise or rash
step, as a mere man would have been, by the rising tide of enthusiasm.
What then had Christ really done thus far? He had securely
laid the foundation of faith in himself as the Son of God and Saviour
in the hearts of the twelve (or perhaps, more strictly speaking, the
eleven) and of a few other humble people throughout the land.
All the other seeming followers, who were only eager for an earthly
Messiah offering to throw off the Roman yoke or to supply them with
the loaves and fishes, Christ now sifts out by this strange discourse,
in which he says that they must eat his flesh and drink his blood if
they would have life in them. From this time onward his principal
work will consist in training his apostles for the work he is to commit
to them.
PART II. MAIN MINISTRY IN GALILEE.
Study 9. Climax of Christ's Public Ministry.
(1) Mission of the twelve apostles 268-274
a. The unique school in which they have been trained 268
b. They are sent out two by two 269
c. Their very simple equipment 269
d. They are to stay in the first friendly house 269
e. They are to avoid formalities 270
/. Actual work of the twelve and of Christ and their reunion 273, 274
(2) More permanent discipleship and apostleship in Christ's vision. . 270-274
a. His representatives must expect misconception and ill-treat-
ment , 270-271
b. They are to be open and fearless in testimony 271
c. Christ must be first in their affections 271, 272
d. Service great or small is their one aim 272, 273
OUTLINE STUDIES. 2676
(3) Death of John the Baptist 274-276
a. Imprisoned because of his brave rebuke of Herod Antipas. . . 274
b. Sudden execution at the demand of Herodias 275
c. His mission worthily accomplished 276
(4) Feeding of the five thousand 277-280
a. Impressions made by the death of John 277
b. Jesus plans a respite for himself and the apostles 277
c. They cross the lake by boat 277, 278
d. The people outgo them by land 278
e. Jesus receives them, and teaches and heals 278
/. He then multiplies the loaves and fishes and feeds the
multitude 278-280
g. They hail him as Messiah and wish to make him king 280
h. He sends the apostles away by boat and the people by land . 280
i. He goes up into a mountain to pray 280, 281
j. Spiritual meaning of miracles and of this one 283, 284
(5) Jesus walking on the water 281, 282
a. The twelve struggling with the storm 281
6. Jesus comes to them walking on the water 281
c. Peter's request is granted to come to him 281
d. He sinks when faith fails, but is lifted up and comes with
Jesus into the "boat 282
e. The wind is stilled and they are at the land 282
(6) Healing work in the land of Gennesaret 285
(7) Discourse in the synagogue at Capernaum 285-296
a. Hitherto Christ has spoken more of the kingdom than of
himself 285, 286
b. This discourse marks the transition point in his teachings . . . 286
c. Jesus would sift out those seeking mere material good 286, 287
d. He therefore says, "Labor not for the meat which per-
isheth" 287
e. The real service of God is to believe on Christ 287
/. Christ presents himself as the bread of life 288-292
g. Many of his disciples go away 292
h. He challenges the faith of the twelve 292
i. Peter answers in a true confession of faith 292
j. The discourse shows that our true life centers in Christ 293-296
2G8 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
IX.
The Mission of the Twelve.*
Jesus returned across the lake from Gadara to resume his labors
in Galilee. The circuit through its southern towns and villages od
which he now embarked was the last he was to make. He looked on
the multitudes that gathered round him with a singular compassion.
Spiritually to his eye they were as sheep scattered abroad, who when
he left them would be without a shepherd. " The harvest," said he
to his disciples, " truly is plenteous, but the laborers are few. Pray
ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he will send forth laborers
into his harvest." But was he not himself the Lord of the harvest,
and had he no laborers to send forth ?
Laborers sufficiently numerous, sufficiently trained, there were
not ; but there were those twelve men whom he had chosen, who had
for many months been continually by his side. He can send them ;
not permanently, for as yet they were comparatively unqualified for
the work. Besides, to separate them finally from himself would be
to disqualify them for the office which they afterwards were to exer-
cise, of being the reporters of his chief sayings, the witnesses of all
the leading actions of his life. But he can send them on a brief, pre-
liminary, experimental tour, one happy effect of which would be, that
the townsmen and villagers of Galilee shall have one more opportu-
nity afforded them of hearing the gospel of the kingdom announced.
The hitherto close companionship of the twelve with Jesus may have
presented to Jewish eyes nothing so extraordinary as to attract much
notice and remark. Their great teachers had their favorite pupils,
whom they kept continually beside them, and whose services of kind-
ness to them they gratefully received and acknowledged. It was
something new, indeed, to see a teacher acting as Jesus did— setting
up no school in any one separate locality, confining himself to no one
place and to no set times or methods; discoursing about the king-
dom, week-day and Sabbath-day alike, publicly in the synagogue,
privately at the supper-table, on road-side and lake-side, from the
bow of the boat and the brow of the mountain. And always close to
him these twelve men are seen who had forsaken their former occu-
pations, and had now attached themselves permanently to his per-
son, ministering to his comfort, imbibing his instructions, forming an
innermost circle of discipleship, within which Jesus was often seen to
'* Matt. 9 : 35-38 ; 10 ; Mark 6 : 7-30 ; Luke 9 : 1-9.
THE MISSION OF THE TWELVE. 269
retire, and to wliich the mysteries of the kingdom were revealed as
there was ability to receive them.
But now a still more singular spectacle is presented. Jesus takes
the twelve, and dividing them into pairs, sends them away from him
two and two ; delivering to them, as he sends them forth, the address
contained in the tenth chapter of the gospel of St. Matthew. A few
minute instructions were first given as to the special missionary tour
on which they were despatched. It was to be confined strictly to
Galilee — to the narrow district that they had already frequently trav-
ersed in their Master's company. But he personally was not to be
the burden of their message. They were not to announce his advent
as the Messiah. He had not done so himself, and their preaching
was not to go beyond his own. They were simply to proclaim the
advent of the kingdom, leaving the works and words of Jesus to point
out the place in that kingdom which he occupied. The power of
working miracles they were for the time to enjoy, but they were not
to use it, as they might easily have done, for any selfish or mercenary
purpose. As freely as they got, they were to give. They were to be
absent but a few days. They were going, not among strangers or
enemies, but among friends and brethren. The more easily and expe-
ditiously they got through their work the better. Unprovided and
unencumbered, they were to cast themselves at once upon the hospi-
tality of those they visited. "Nor was there in this," says Dr. Thom-
son, " any departure from the simple manners of the country. At
this day the farmer sets out on excursions quite as extensive without
a para in his purse, and the modern Moslem prophet of Tarshiha
thus sends forth his apostles over this identical region. Neither do
they encumber themselves with two coats. They are accustomed to
sleep in the garments they wear during the day ; and in this climate
such plain people experience therefrom no inconvenience. They wear
coarse shoes, answering to the sandal of the ancients, but never carry
two pairs ; and, although the staff is the invariable companion of all
wayfarers, they are content with owe."* The directions given to the
apostles were proper to a short and hasty journey, such as the one
now before them. On entering any town or village, their first inquiry
was to be for the susceptible, the well-disposed, about whom, after
the excitement consequent upon Christ's former visits, some informa-
tion might easily be obtained. They were to salute the house in
which such resided, to enter it, and if well-received, were to remain
in it, not going from house to house, wasting their time in multiplied
9 "The Land and the Book," p. 346. In St. Matthew's gospel it is said they
were not to take staves : in Mark, that they were to take one, that is, one oni>.
270 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
or prolonged formalities and salutations by the way. Wherever
rejected, they were to shake off the dust of their feet against that
house or city ; and to create a profound impression of the importance
of the errand on which they were despatched, Jesus closes the first
part of his address to them by saying, "Verily I say unto you, It
shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrah, in the
day of judgment, than for that city."
Hitherto, all that he had said had direct reference to the short
and rapid journey that lay immediately before them. But limited as
it was, the task now committed to them carried in it the germ, the
type of that larger apostolic work for which, by the gift of the Spirit,
they were to be qualified, and in which, for so many years after their
Master's death, they were to be engaged. And so, after speaking of
the one, Jesus passes on to the other, the nearer and narrower mis-
sion sinking out of sight as his eye rests on the farther and broader
mission that lay before them. In the one, the nearer, there was to
be no opposition or persecution; in the other, a fiery trial was in
store for the faithful. The one, the nearer, was to be confined to the
lost sheep of the house of Israel; in the other, they were to come
into collision with the kings and governors of the Gentiles. It is of
this second period — of the persecution on the one hand, and the
gifts of the qualifying Spirit on the other, by which it should be dis-
tinguished — that Jesus speaks in the passage embraced in the verses
from the sixteenth to the twenty-third. The second division of the
address closes, as the first does, by a "Verily I say unto you." The
fact thus solemnly affirmed pointing, in the destruction of Jerusalem,
to the close of that period over which Christ's prophetic eye was now
ranging : " Verity I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the
cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come."
But now the whole earthly mission of the twelve presents itself
to the Saviour's eye but as the preface and prelude to that continu-
ous, abiding work of witnessing for him upon this earth to which
each separate disciple of the cross is called. Dropping, therefore, all
directions and allusions referring exclusively to the apostles and to
apostolic times, Jesus, in the closing and larger portion of the address,
from the twenty-fourth to the forty-second verse, speaks generally of
all true discipleship to himself upon this earth: foretelling its for-
tunes, describing its character, its duties, its encouragements, and its
rewards.
Jesus would hold out no false hopes — would have no one become
his upon any false expectations. Misconception, misrepresentation,
ill-treatment of c ne kind or other, his time and faithful followers must
THE MISSION OF THE TWELVE. 273
be prepared to meet — to meet without surprise, without complaint,
without resentment. The disciple need not hope to be above his
Master, the servant above his Lord. " If they have called the mas-
ter of the house Beelzebub, how much more them of his household?'*
But why should the covert slander, the calumny whispered in secret,
be dreaded, when the day was coming when all that is covered shall
be revealed, all that is hid shall be made known ? With his disciples
there shall be no concealment of any kind. He came to found no
secret society, linked by hidden bonds, depository of inner mysteries.
True, there were things that he addressed alone to the apostles' ear
in private, but the secrecy and reserve so practised by him was meant
to be temporary and transient. "What I tell you thus in darkness,
that speak ye in the light : and what ye hear in the ear, that preach
ye upon the housetops." ' The doing so may imperil life, the life of
the body; but what of that? "Fear not them which kill the body,
but are not able to kill the soul : but rather fear him which is able to
destroy both soul and body in hell." But even the life of the body
shall be watched over, not suffered needlessly to perish. Not a single
sparrow, though worth but half a farthing, falls to the ground with-
out God's knowledge, not a hair of your head but is numbered by
him. "Fear ye not therefore, ye are of more value than many spar-
rows." The head whose very hairs are numbered by him, your Father
will not see lightly or uselessly cut off. Leave your fate then in his
hands, and whatever that may be, be open, be honest, be full, be
fearless in the testimony ye bear, for "Whosoever shall confess me
before men, him will I confess before my Father which is in heaven.
But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I deny before my
Father which is in heaven." Times of outward persecution may not
last, but think not that on this earth there shall ever be perfect peace.
" I came not to send peace, but a sword," a sword which, though it
drop out of the open hand of the persecutor, shall not want other
hands to take it up and wield it differently. " I am come to set a
man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her
mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law, and a
man's foes shall be they of his own household." And to no severer
trial shall my followers be subject, than when it is not force but affec-
tion, the affection of the nearest and dearest on earth, that would
draw them away from me, or tempt them to be unfaithful io my
cause.
'But above all other claims is the one T make on the love of all
who choose me as their Saviour and their Lord- I must be first in
their affections : the throne of their heart must be mine ; no rival per-
272 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
nritted to sit by my side. It is not that I am selfishly exactive ©I
affection; it is not that I am jealous of other love; it is not that I
wish or ask that you should love others less in older to loie me
more ; but it is, that what I am to you, what I have done for you,
what from this time forth and for evermore I am prepared to be
to and to do for you, gives me such a priority and precedence in
jhe claim I make, "that he that loveth father and mother more
than me is not worthy of me, and he that loveth son or daughter
more than me is not worthy of me." A bitter thing it may be to
crucify some inordinate earthly desire of affection in order to give
me, or to keep me in, that place of supremacy which is the only one
I possibly or consistently can occupy. But he that taketh not up
the cross for me, even as I have taken up the cross for him ; he
that will not deny himself, and in the exercise of that self-denial
take up his cross daily and follow me; "he is not worthy of me, he
cannot be my disciple." For this is one of the fixed unalterable con-
ditions of that spiritual economy under which you and all men live,
that he who maketh the pursuits and the pleasures of the present
oeene of things the aim of his being ; he who by any manner or form
of self-gratification seeks to gain his life, shall lose it, shall fail at the
last even in the very thing upon which he has set his heart. Where-
as he who for my sake shall give himself to the mortifying of every
evil affection of his nature, to the crucifying of the flesh with the
affections and lusts thereof, he shall find the life he seems to 1 3se ;
out of the death of the lower shall spring the higher, the eternal life
of the spirit. And let all of every degree, whether they be apostles
or prophets, or simple disciples, or the least of these my little
ones, be animated, be elevated throughout that strife with self and
sin, the world and the devil, to which in Christ they are called, by
remembering what a dignified position they occupy, whose repre-
sentatives they are. "He that receiveth you receiveth me; he that
receiveth me receiveth him that sent me." And if it be in the name
or the character of a prophet that any one receives you, he, the
receiver, shall have a prophet's reward ; or if in the name simply of a
righteous man that any one receive you, he, the receiver, shall have &
righteous man's reward; nay, more, if it be to any of the least of my
little ones that a cup only of cold water be given in the name of a
disciple, he, the giver, shall in no wise lose his reward.' For so it is,
and ever shall be, not simply by great meu going out upon great em-
bassies and speaking words of power to gathered multitudes, or by
great assemblies propounding or enforcing great and solemn truths,
that the kingdom of Jesus Christ is advanced, but by all, the high
THE MISSION OF THE SEVENTY. 273
and low, and rich and poor, and weak and strong, who bear his name,
looking upon themselves as his missionaries here on earth, sent by
him even as he was sent by his Father ; sent, that they may be to one
another what he has been to them, seeking each other's good, willing
to communicate, giving and in giving receiving, receiving and in
receiving imparting, each doing a little in one way or other to com-
mend to others that Saviour in whom is all his trust, these littles
making up that vast and ever multiplying agency by which the
empire of the Eedeemer over human spirits is being continually en-
larged.
Can any one read over and even partially enter into the meaning
of those words which Jesus spake to his apostles when sending them
for the first time from his side — a season when there was so little
material out of which any rational conjecture could be formed as to
his future or theirs, or the future of any school or sect, or institution
that He and they might found — and not be convinced that open as day
lay all that future to him who here, as elsewhere in so many of his
most important discourses, sets forth in a series of perspectives — mix-
ing with and melting into each other — the whole history of* his church
in all its trials and conflicts from the beginning even to the end? But
a greater than a prophet is here — one who speaks of men being
hated, persecuted, scourged, and put to death for his name's sake, as
if there were nothing in any wise unreasonable or unnatural in it;
one who would have all men come to him, and who asks of all who
come, love, obedience, and sacrifice, such as but one Being has a
right to ask, even he who has redeemed us to God by his blood,
whose right over all we are and have and can do is supreme, unchal-
lengeable, unchangeable ; whose, by every tie, we are, and whom ; by
the mightiest of obligations, we are bound to love and serve.
The sight must have been a very extraordinary one, of the apos-
tles setting off two by two from their Master's side, passing with such
eagerness and haste through the towns and villages, preaching and
working miracles. To hear one man preach as Jesus did, to see one
man confirm his w T ord by doing such wonderful works, filled the whole
community with wonder. To what a higher pitch must that wonder
have been raised when they saw others commissioned by him, endowed
by him, not only preaching as he did, but healing, too, all manner of
disease! True, the circle was a small one to whom such special pow-
ers were delegated ; but half a year or so afterwards, as if to to teach
that ii was not to the twelve alone — to those holding the high office
of the apostolate — that Jesus was prepared to grant such a commis-
sion, he sent out a band of seventy men, embracing, we are inclined
Llf a of Chriit. 18
274 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to believe, almost the entire body of his professed disciples in the
north who were of the age and had the strength to execute such a
task ; addressing them in almost the same terms, imposing on them
the same duties, and clothing them with the same prerogatives,
clearly manifesting by his employment of so large a number of his
ordinary disciples that it was not his purpose that the dissemination
of the knowledge of his name should be confined to any one small
and peculiarly endowed body of men.
It appears from the statement of St. Matthew that when Jesus
" had made an end of commanding his twelve disciples, he departed
thence to teach and to preach in their cities," continuing thus his
own personal labors in the absence of the twelve. How long they
remained apart, in the absence of all definite notes of time, can only
be a matter of conjecture. A few days would carry the apostles over
all the ground they had to traverse, and they would not loiter by the
way. Ere very long they were all united once more at Capernaum.
Tidings met them there of a very sad event which had just occurred,
we know not exactly where, but if Josephus is to be trusted, it was
in the remotest region of that district over which Herod Antipas
ruled. It is very singular that though Herod governed Galilee, and
built and generally resided at Tiberias, a town upon the lake-side a
few miles south of the plain of Gennesaret, he had never met with
Jesus ; had done nothing to interrupt his labors, though these weie
making so great a sensation all over the country ; had never, appa-
rently, till about this time, even heard of him or of his works. It
has not unreasonably been conjectured that soon after throwing John
the Baptist into prison, he had been absent on one of his journeys to
Rome during those very months in which our Lord's Galilean minis-
try was most openly and actively conducted. Even, however, had
this not been the case — as we never read of Jesus visiting Tiberias —
we can readily enough imagine that Herod might have been living
there all the time, too much engaged with other things to heed much
what, if at all spoken of in his presence, would be spoken of con-
temptuously as a new Jewish religious ferment that was spreading
among the people. The public tranquillity was not threatened; and,
that preserved, they might have as many such religious excitements
among them as they liked. Though fully cognizant of the nature
and progress of the Baptist's ministry, he had done nothing to stop
it. It was not on any public or political grounds, but purely acd
soiely on a personal one, that he had cast John into prison. At first
lie had listened to him gladly, and done many things at his bidding,
but the Baptist had been bold enough to tell him that it was not
MARTYRDOM OF JOHN THE BAPTIST. 275
lawful for him to have his brother's wife, and brave enough at all
hazards to stand by what he said. He wo aid neither modify nor
retract. Herod's anger was kindled against him, and was well nursed
und kept warm by Herodias. She would have made short work with
the impudent intermeddler. But Herod feared the people, and so
contented himself with casting him into that prison in which he lay
so many long and weary months. While lying there alone and inac-
tive, he had sent, as we have seen, two of his disciples to Jesus to
ask him, "Art thou he that should come, or look we foi another?"
It was after all but an indirect and ambiguous reply that they had
brought back— enough, and more than enough, to meet any transient
doubt as to Christ's character and office which in any quarter might
have arisen, but carrying with it no reference to the Baptist's per-
sonal state — embodying no message of sympathy, holding out no
prospect of relief. All that was left to John was to cling to the hope
that his long imprisonment must be near its end. Herod might
relent, or Jesus might interpose ; somehow or other the deliverance
would come. And it did come at last, but not as John had looked
for it. It came in the form of that grim executioner, who, breaking
in upon his solitude, and flashing before his eyes the instrument of
death, bade him bow his head at, once to the fatal stroke. Short
warning this: was no explanation to be given? no interview with
Herod allowed ? not a day nor an hour for preparation given ? No.
The king's order was for instant execution. The damsel was waiting
for the head, and the mother waiting for the damsel. How did the
Baptist bear himself at that trying moment? There were no crowds
to witness this martyr's death ; not one there to tell us afterwards
how he looked, or what he said. Alone, he had to gird his spirit up
to meet his doom. A moment or two, spent we know not how, and
the death-blow fell.
It is said that when death comes suddenly upon a man — when,
this moment in full possession of his faculties, he knows that next
moment is to be his last — within that moment there flashes often
upon the memory the whole scenery of a bygone life. If such a
vision of the past rose up before the Baptist's eye, what a strange,
mysterious thing might that life of his on earth have seemed — how
likfe a failure, how seemingly abortive ! Thirty long years of prepa-
ra tion ; then a brief and wonderful success, brimful of promise ; that
success suddenly arrested ; all means and opportunities of active ser-
vice plucked out of his hand. Then the idle months in prison, and
then the felon's death ! Mysterious, inexplicable as such a life might
look to the eye of sense, how looked it to the eye of God? Manj
276 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
flattering things have been said of men when they were living; many
false and fulsome epitaphs have been graven on their tombs ; but the
lips that never flattered have said of John, that of those that have
been born of women there hath not arisen a greater ; his greatness
mainly due to his peculiar connection with Christ, but not unsup-
ported by his personal character, for he is one of the few prominent
figures in the sacred page upon which not a single stain is seen to
rest. And though they buried him in some obscure grave to which
none went on pilgrimage, yet for that tomb the pen that never traced
a line of falsehood has written the brief but pregnant epitaph : "John
fulfilled his course." Terminating so abruptly at such an early stage,
with large capacity for work, and plenty of work to do, shall we not
say of this man that his life was unseasonably and prematurely cut
off? No ; his earthly task was done : he had a certain work assigned
him here, and it was finished. Nor could a higher eulogium have
been pronounced over his grave than this, that he had fulfilled the
course assigned to him by Providence. Let the testimony thus borne
to him convince us that there is a special and narrow sphere which
God has marked out for each of us on earth. To be wise to know
what that sphere is, to accept it and keep to it, and be content with
it — diligently, perseveringly, thankfully, submissively to do its work
and bear its burdens, is one of our first duties, a duty which in its
discharge will minister one of our simplest and purest joys.
The bloody head was grasped by the executioner and carried into
the king's presence, and given to the damsel ; and she carried it to
her mother. The sense of sated vengeance may for the moment have
filled the heart of Herodias with a grim and devilish joy ; but those
pale lips, those fixed and glazed eyes, that livid countenance upon
whose rigid features the shadow of its living sternness is still resting,
she cannot look long at them ; she waves the ghastly object from her
sight, to be borne away, and laid we know not where.
The headless body had been left upon the prison floor. So soon
as they hear of what has happened, some of John's disciples come
and lift it up and bear it out sadly to burial ; and that last office
done, in their desolation and helplessness they followed the instinct
of that new faith which their Master's teaching had inspired, they
went and told Jesus. They did what in all our sorrows we should
do : they went and told him who can most fully sympathize, and who
alone can thoroughly and abidingly comfort and sustain.
THE FEEDING OF THE FIVE THOUSAND. 277
X.
The Feeding of the Five Thousand, and the
Walking upon the Water.*
Herod first heard of Jesus immediately after the Baptist's death.
While some said that this Jesus now so much spoken of was Elias,
or one of the prophets, there were others about the Tetrarch who
suggested that he was John risen from the dead. Herod had little
real faith, but that did not prevent his lying open enough to super-
stitious fancies. He was ill at ease about what he had done on his
birthday feast — haunted by fears that he could not shake off. The
suggestion about Jesus fell in with these fears, and helped in a way
to soothe them. And so, after some perplexity and doubt, at last he
adopted it, and proclaimed it to be his own conviction, saying to his
servants, as if with a somewhat lightened conscience, " This is John,
whom I beheaded : he is risen from the dead : and therefore mighty
works do show forth themselves in him." John had done no mighty
works so long as Herod knew him, but now, in this new estate, he
had risen to a higher level, to which he, Herod, had helped to ele-
vate him — he would like to see him in the new garb.
The disciples of John, who came and told Jesus of their master's
death, had to tell him, also, of the strange credulity and curiosity of
Herod. We are left to imagine the impression their report created.
It came at the very time when the twelve had returned from their
short and separate excursions, and when, as the fruit of the divided
and multiplied agency that had been exerted, so many were coming
and going out and in among the reassembled band, that •■ they had
no leisure," we are told, " so much as to eat." Mark 6 : 21. For
himself and for them, Jesns desired now a little quiet and seclusion.
For himself — that he might ponder over a death prophetic of his own,
the occurrence of which made, as we shall see, an epoch in his minis-
try. For them — that they might have some respite from accumulated
fatigue and toil. His own purpose fixed, he invited them to join him
in its execution, saying to them, " Come ye yourselves into a desert
place and rest a while." Such a desert place as would afford the
seclusion that they sought, they had not to go far to find. Over
Against Capernaum, across the lake, in the district running up north-
ward to Bethsaida, are plenty of lonely enough places to choose
among. They take boat to row across. The wind blows fresh
* Matt U : 12-33 ; Mark 6 : 30-52 ; Luke 9 : 10-17 ; John 6 : 1-21.
278 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
from the northwest ; for shelter, they hug the shore. Their departure
had been watched by the crowd, and now, when they see how close to
the land they keep, and how slow the progress is they make, a great
multitude out of all the cities — embracing, in all likelihood, many of
those companies which had gathered to go up to the Passover — mn
on foot along the shore. A less than two hours' walk brings them to
Bethsaida, at the northern extremity of the lake. There they cross
the Jordan, and enter upon that large and -uninhabited plain that
slopes down to the lake on its northeastern shores. Another hour or
so carries them to the spot at which Christ and his apostles land,
where many, having outstripped the boat, are ready to receive
them, and where more and more still come, bearing their sick along
with them. It was somewhat of a trial to have the purpose of the
voyage apparently thus baffled, the seclusion sought after thus vio-
lated ; but if felt at all, it sat light upon a heart which, turning away
from the thought of self, was filled with compassion for those who
were " as sheep not having a shepherd." Retiring to a neighboring
mountain, Jesus sits down and teaches, and heals ; and so the hours
of the afternoon pass by.
But now another kind of solicitude seizes on the disciples. They
may not have been as patient of the defeat of their Master's purpose
as he was himself. They may have grudged to see the hours that he
had destined to repose broken in upon and so fully occupied. True,
they had little to do themselves but listen, and wait, and watch. The
crowd grew, however; stream followed stream, and poured itself out
upon the mountain-side. The day declined ; the evening shadows
lengthened ; yet, as if never satisfied, that vast company still clung to
Jesus, and made no movement to depart. The disciples grew anx-
ious. They came at last to Jesus, and said, " This is a desert place,
and the time is now past : send the multitude away, that they may go
into the country round about, and into the villages, and lodge, and
buy bread for themselves, for they have nothing to eat." "They
need not depart," said Jesus, " give you to them to eat." Turning
to Philip, a native of Bethsaida, one well acquainted with the adjoin-
ing district, Jesus saith in an inquiring tone, " "Whence shall we buy
bread, that these may eat?" Philip runs his eye over the great
assemblage, and making a rough estimate of what would be required,
he answered, " Two hundred pennyworth of bread would not be suffi-
cient for them, that every one might ' get a little ;' shall we go and
buy as much?" Jesus asked how much food they had among them-
selves, without needing to go and make any further purchase. An-
drew, another native of Bethsaida, who had been scrutinizing the
THE FEEDING OF THE FIVE THOUSAND. 279
crowd, discovering some old acquaintances, said, " There is a lad
here, who has five barley loaves and two small fishes ; but what are
they among so many?" "Bring them to me," said Jesus. They
brought them. " Make the men," he said, " sit down by fifties in a
company " — an order indicative of our Lord's design that there might
be no confusion and that the attention of all might be directed to what
he was about to do. The season was favorable — it was the full
spring-tide of the year ; the place was convenient — much green grass
covering the broad and gentle slope that stretched away from the
base of the mountain. The marshalling of five thousand men, besides
women and children, into such an orderly array, must have taken
some time. The people, however, quietly consented to be so arranged,
and company after company sat down, till the whole were seated in
the presence of the Lord, who all the while has stood in silence
watching the operation, with that scanty stock of provisions in his
hand. All eyes are now upon him. He begins to speak ; he prays ;
he blesses the five loaves and the two fishes, breaks them, divides
them among the twelve, and directs them to go and distribute them
among the others.
And now, among those thousands — sitting there and ranged so
that all can see what is going on — the mystery of their feeding begins
to show itself. There were one hundred companies of fifty, besides
the women and children. In each apostle's hand, as he takes his
portion from the hand of Jesus, there is not more than would reach
one man's need. Yet, as the distribution by the twelve begins, there
is enough to give what looks like a sufficient portion to each of the
hundred men, who sits at the head of his company. He gets it, and,
little enough as it seems for himself, he is told to divide it, and give
the half of it to his neighbor, to be dealt with in like fashion. Each
man in the ranks, as he begins to break, finds that the half that he
got at first grows into a whole in the very act of dividing and bestow-
ing; the small initial supply grows and multiplies in the transmission
from hand to hand. All eat — all are satisfied. "Gather up," said
Jesus, as he saw some unused food lying scattered upon the ground,
" the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost." They do ; and
while one basket could hold the five loaves and the two fishes, it now
takes twelve to hold these fragments.
Of the nature and purpose of this great miracle, we shall have
something to say hereafter. Meanwhile, let us notice its immediate
olfect. One of its singularities, as compared with other miracles of
our Lord, was this : that such a vast multitude were all at once not
only spectators of it, but participators of its benefits. Seven or eight
280 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
thousand hungry men, women and children sit down upon a hillside,
and there before their eyes, for an hour or two — full leisure given
them to contemplate and reflect — the spectacle goes on, of a few
loaves and fishes, under Christ's blessing, and by some mysterious
acting of his great power, expanding in their hands till they are all
more than satisfied. Each sees the wonder, and shares in the result.
It is not like a miracle, however great, wrought instantly upon a single
man. Such a miracle the same number of men, women, and children
might see, indeed, but could not all see as each saw this. The im-
pression here of a very marvellous exhibition of the divine power, so
near akin to that of creative energy, was one so broadly, so evenly, so
slowly, and so deeply made, that it looks to us just what we might have
expected when the thousands rise from their seats, when all is over,
and say one to another, what they had never got the length of say-
ing previously, "This is of a truth that Prophet that should come
into the world." No longer any doubt or vagueness in their faith —
no longer a question with them which prophet or what kind of
prophet he was. He is none other than their Messiah, their Prince !
He who can do that which they have just seen him do, what could be
beyond his power? He may not himself be willing to come forward,
assert his right, exert his power — but they will do it for him — they
will do it now ; they will take him at once, and force him to be their
king. Jesus sees the incipient action of that leaven which, if allowed
to work, would lead on to some act of violence. He sees that the
leaven of earthliness and mere JeAvish pride and ambition has enter-
ed even among the twelve, who, as they see and hear what is going
on, appear not unwilling to take part with the multitude. It is time
for him to interfere and prevent any such catastrophe. He calls the
twelve to him, and directs them to embark immediately, to go alone
and leave him there, to row back to Capernaum, where, in the course
of the night or the next morning, he might join them. A strange
and unwelcome proposal — for why should they be parted, and where
was their Master to go, or what was he to do, in the long hours of
that lowering night that was coming down in darkness and storm
upon the hills and lake ? They remonstrate ; but with a peremptori-
ness and decision, the very rarity of which gave it all the greater power,
he overrules their remonstrances, and constrains them to get into the
boat and leave him behind. Turning to the multitude, whose plot
about taking and making him a king, taken up by his twelve chief
followers, this transaction had interrupted, he dismisses them in such
a way, with such words of power, that they at once disperse.
And now he is alone. Alone he goes up into a mountain- -alone
THE WALKING UPON THE WATER. 281
he prays there. The darkness deepens ; the tempest rises ; midnight
comes with its gusts and gloom. There — somewhere on that moun-
tain, sheltered or exposed — there, for five or six hours, till the fourth
watch of the night, till after dawn — Jesus holds his secret and close
fellowship with heaven. Into the privacies of those secluded hours
of his devotion we presume not to intrude. But if, as we shall pres-
ently see was actually the case, this threatened outbreak of a blinded
popular impulse in his favor — the attempt thus made, and for the
moment thwarted, to take him by force and make him a king — created
a marked crisis in the history of our Lord's dealings with the multi-
tude, as well as of their disposition and conduct towards him — this
night of lonely prayer is to be put alongside of the other instances
in which, upon important emergencies, our Saviour had recourse
to privacy and prayer, teaching us, by his great example, where
our refuge and our strength in all like circumstances are to be
found.
Meanwhile it has fared ill with the disciples on the lake. Two or
three hours' hearty labor at the oar might have carried them over to
Capernaum. But the adverse tempest is too strong for them. The
whole night long they toil among the waves, against the wind. The
day had dawned, a dim light from the east is spreading over the
water; they had rowed about five and-twenty or thirty furlongs—
were rather more than halfway across the lake — when, treading on
the troubled waves, as on a level, solid pavement, a figure is seen
approaching, drawing nearer and nearer to the boat. Their toil is
changed to terror — the vigorous hand relaxes its grasp — the oars
stand still in the air or are but feebly plied — the boat rocks heavily —
a cry of terror comes from the frightened crew — they think it is a
spirit. He made as though he would have passed them by — they cry
out the more. For though so like their Master as they now see the
form to be, yet if he go past them in silence, it cannot be other than
his ghost. But now he turns, and, dispelling at once all doubt and
fear, he says, "Be of good cheer; it is I, be not afraid." He is but
a few yards from the boat, when, leaping at once— as was no strange
thing with him — from one extremity to the other, Peter says, "Lord,
if it be thou " — or rather, for we cannot think that he had any doubt
as to Christ's identity — " Since it is thou, let me come unto thee on
the water." Why not wait till Jesus comes into the boat? Because
lie is so pleased, so proud to see his Master tread with such victorious
footstep the restless devouring deep ; because he wants to share the
triumph of the deed — to walk side by side, before his brothers, with
Jesus, though it be but a step or two.
282 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
He gets the permission — he makes the attempt — -is at first sue
cessful. So long as he keeps his eye on Jesus — so long as that faith
which prompted the proposal, that sense of dependence in which the
first step out of the boat and down upon the deep was taken, remain
unshaken — all goes well. But he has scarce moved off from the boat
when he looks away from Christ, and out oyer the tempestuous sea.
The wind is not more boisterous, the waves are not higher or rougher
than they were the moment before, but he was not thinking of them
then. He was looking at, he was thinking of, he was hanging upon his
Master then. Now he looks at, thinks only of wind and wave. His
faith begins to fail ; fearing, he begins to sink ; sinking, he fixes his
eye afresh and most earnestly on Jesus. The eye affecting the heart,
rekindling faith in the very bosom of despair, he cries out, "Lord,
save me!" It was the cry of weakness, of wild alarm, yet it had in
it one grain of gold. It was a cry to Jesus as to the only one that
now could help ; some true faith mingling now with all the fear.
The help so sought for came at once. " Immediately Jesus stretch-
ed forth his hand and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little
faith, wherefore didst thou doubt?" At the grasp of that helping
hand, at the rebuke of that chiding voice, let us believe that faith
came back into Peter's breast, and that not borne up or dragged
through the waters, but walking by his Master's side, he made his
way back to the little vessel where his comrades were, to take his
place among them a wiser and a humbler man. As soon as Jesus
and he had entered the vessel, we are told that the wind not only
ceased, but that " immediately the ship was at the land whither they
went." Of those who were in the ship that night some were exceed-
ingly but stupidly amazed, then- hearts hardened, untouched by the
multiplied miracles (Mark 6:51, 52) of the last twelve hours; others
came and worshipped Jesus, saying, " Of a truth thou art the Son of
God;" one of the first instances in which this great title, of which we
shall have so much to say hereafter, was applied to him.
We may divide the miracles of our Saviour into two classes:
1. Those wrought in or upon nature. 2. Those wrought in or upon
man. Of the thirty-three miracles of which some detailed account ifl
given us in the gospels, nine belong to the former and twenty-four to
the latter class. But this gives no true idea of the mere numerical
ratio of the one kind of miracles to the other. It is but a very few of
the many thousand cases of healing on the part of Jesus of which
any record has been preserved ; while it seems probable that all the
instances have been recounted in which there was any intervention
with the laws or processes of the material universe. It is remarka-
THE WALKING UPON THE WATER. 283
ble at least that of tlie small number of this class a repetition of the
same miracle is twice recorded — -that of the multiplying of bread and
of an extraordinary draught of fishes. Looking broadly at these two
classes of miracles, it might appear like a discriminating difference
oetween them that the one, the miracles on nature, were more works
of power, the miracles on man more works of love. And admitting
for the moment the existence of some ground for this distinction, it
pleases us to think what a vast preponderance Christ's works of
love had over his works of power. But it is only to a very limited
extent that we are disposed to admit the truth of this distinction.
We know of no miracle of our Lord that was a mere miracle of power,
a mere display of his omnipotence, a mere sign wrought to prove that
he was almighty. Every miracle of our Saviour carried with it a les-
son of wisdom, gave an exhibition of his character, was a type of
some lower sphere of his working as the Redeemer of our souls. In
a far more intimate sense than any of them was an outward proof of
his divine authority; they were all instances or illustrations in more
shadowy or more substantial form of the remedial dispensations of
his mercy and grace in and upon the sinful children of men, wrought
by him and recorded now for us, far more to teach us what, as our Sav-
iour, he is — what he has already done, and what he is prepared to
do for us spiritually — than to put into our hands evidence of the
divinity of his mission.
Let us take the two miracles that we have now before us, both of
which belong to the first and smaller class, the miracles on nature.
Had it been the purpose of our Lord to make a mere display of his
omnipotence in the feeding of five thousand men, one can readily
imagine of its being done in a far more visible and striking style than
the one chosen. He could have had the men, women, and children
go and gather up the stones of the desert or of the lake-side; and as
they did so, could have turned each stone into bread. Or he could
have brought forth the five loaves, and in the presence of all the peo-
ple have multiplied them into five thousand by a w T ave of his hand-
by a word of his power. He chose rather, here as elsewhere — might
we not say as everywhere? — to veil the workings of his omnipotence —
to hide, as it were, the working of his hand and power, mingling it
with that of human hands and common earthly elements. How
much more it was our Lord's design to convey a lesson of instructioL
than to give a display of his almightiness we shall better be able to
judge when we have before us his own discourse illustrative of this
very miracle, delivered on the following day. We shall then see how
apt and singular and recondite a symbolism of what he spiritually is
284 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to all true believers lay wrapped up in his blessing and breaking and
dividing the bread.
But further still, was not the agency of all his ministering ser-
vants, of all his true disciples, most truly, vividly, picturesquely rep-
resented in what happened upon that mountain-side ? " Give ye them
to eat!" such were Christ's words to his apostles, as he handed to
each of them his portion of the five loaves and the two fishes. 'Take
and break and give to one another;' such were the apostles' words
to the multitude. And as each took and broke, the half that he kept
for himself grew within the hand that broke it, as did in turn the
other half he handed to his neighbor. Such was the rule and method
of the distribution and multiplication of the bread given to the thou-
sands on the desert place of Bethsaida. Such is the rule and method
of the distribution and multiplication of the bread of life.
Let us gladly and gratefully accept the lesson that the miracle
conveys. Let us believe, and act upon the belief, that the readier we
are to distribute of that bread to others, the fuller and the richer shall
be our own supply — that we do not lose but gain by giving here —
that there is that scattereth here and yet increaseth. From hand to
hand let the life-giving bread be passed, till all the hungry and the
perishing get their portion — till all eat and are satisfied.
Or look again at the other miracle, that of walking upon the
water. It was indeed a miracle of power, but one also of pity too,
and love. He came in the morning watch, far more to relieve from
toil and protect from danger his wornout and exposed disciples than,
merely to show that the sovereignty over nature was in his hands.
Nor did he let that coming pass without an incident pregnant with
spiritual instruction to us also ; for is there not much in each of us of
Peter's weakness ? We may not have his first courage or faith — for
there was much of both in the stepping out of the boat ; or we may
not share in his impetuousness and over-confidence ; and so we may
not throw ourselves among the waves and winds. But often, never-
theless, they are around us ; and too apt are we, when so it happens
with us, to look at them — to think of our difficulties and our trials
and our temptations, till, Christ forgotten and out of sight, we begin
to sink, happy only if in our sinking we turn to him, and his hand be
stretched out to save us. In his extremity, it was not Peter's laying
hold of Christ, it was Christ's laying hold of him that bore him up.
And in our extremity it is not our hold of Jesus, but his of us, on
which our trust resteth. Our hand is weak, but his is strong; ours
so readily relaxes — too often lets go its hold ; but his — none can pluck
out of it, and none that are in it can perish.
'As Many as Touched Were Made Whole."
THE DISCOURSE IN THE SYNAGOGUE. 285
XI.
The Discourse in the Synagogue of Capernaum.*
When, after a single day's absence on the other side of the lake
Jesus and his disciples returned to the land of Gennesaret, so soon as
they were come out of the ship, "straightway," we are told, "they
knew him, and ran through that whole region round about, and sent
out into all that country, and brought to him all that were diseased,
and began to carry about in beds those that were sick; and whither-
soever he entered, into villages, or cities, or country, they laid the
sick in the streets, and besought him that they might touch if it were
but the border of his garment : and as many as touched him were
made whole." Matt. 14 : 35 ; Mark 6 : 54-56.
Never before had there appeared to be so great and so lively an
interest in his teaching, or so large a measure of faith in his healing
power. But behind this show of things Jesus saw that there was lit-
tle or no readiness to receive him in his highest character and office.
Some were prepared to acknowledge him as Elias, or one of the
prophets ; some, like Herod, to hail him as the Baptist risen from the
dead ; others, Hke the multitude on the lakeside, to take him by force
and make him a king; but the notions of all alike concerning him
and his mission were narrow, natural, earthly, selfish, unspiritual. It
is at this very culminating point of his wonderful apparent popular-
ity, that Jesus begins to speak and act as if the hope were\ gone of
other and higher notions of himself and of the kingdom of Go(d being
entertained by the nation at large. Hitherto he had spoken\niuch
about that kingdom, and but little about himself; leaving his place
therein to be inferred from what he said and did. He had spoken
much about the dispositions that were to be cultivated, the duties
that were to be done, the trials that were to be borne, the blessedness
that was to be enjoyed by those admitted into the kingdom — of which
earlier teaching St. Matthew had preserved a full and perfect speci-
men in the Sermon on the Mount ; but he had said little or nothing
of the one living central spring of light and life and holiness and joy
within that kingdom, giving to it its being, character, and strength.
In plainer or in clearer guise he had proclaimed to the multitude
those outer things of the kingdom whose setting forth should have
allured them into it; but its inner things had either been kept back
from sight, or presented in forms draped around with a thick mantle
« Jolm C : 22-71.
286 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
of obscurity. He had never once hinted at his own approaching
death as needful to its establishment — as laying, in fact, the founda-
tion upon which it was to rest; nor had he spoken of the singular
ties by which all its subjects were to be united personally to him, and
to which their entrance and standing and privileges within the king-
dom were to be wholly due. Now, however, for the first time in pub-
lic, he alludes to his death, in such a way indeed as few if any of his
hearers could then understand, yet one that assigned to it its true
place in the economy of our redemption. Now for the first time in
public he speaks openly and most emphatically of what he is and
must be to all who are saved ; proclaiming a supreme attachment to
himself, an entire and exclusive dependence on himself, a vital incor-
porating union with himself, to be the primary and essential charac-
teristic of all true subjects of that kingdom which he came down
from heaven to set up on earth. From this time he gives up appa-
rently the project of gaining new adherents; withdraws from the
crowds, forsakes the more populous districts of Galilee, devotes him-
self to his disciples, retires with them to remote parts of the country,
discourses with them about his approaching decease, unfolding as he
had not done before, both publicly and privately, the profounder
mysteries of his person and of his work.
To the discourse recorded by St. John in the sixth chapter of his
gospel, the special interest attaches that it marks this transition point
in the teachings and actings of our Lord. The great body of those
miraculously fed upon the five loaves and the two fishes dispersed at
the command of Christ, and sought their homes or new camping
grounds. A number, however, still fingered near the sj)ot where the
miracle had been performed. They had seen the apostles go off with-
out Jesus. They had noticed that the boat they sailed in was the
only one that had left the shore. They expected to meet Christ again
next morning ; but, though they sought for him everywhere around,
they could not find him. He must have taken some means to follow
and rejoin his disciples, though what these were they cannot fancy.
In the course of the forenoon some boats come over from Tiberias,
of which they take advantage to recross the lake. After searching
for him in the land of Gennesaret they find him at last in the syna-
gogue of Capernaum. The edge of their wonder still fresh, they say
to him, "Rabbi, when earnest thou hither?" — a mere idle question o*
curiosity, to which he gives no answer. A far weightier question fo
thorn than any as to the time or the manner in which Jesus had got
here was, why were they so eagerly following him ? This question he
will help them to answer. "Verily, verily," is our Lord's reply, "ye
THE DISCOURSE IN THE SYNAGOGUE. l 287
seek roe, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of
the loaves and were filled." The miracle of the preceding evening
had introduced a new element of attractive power. The multitudes
who had previously followed Jesus to get their sick healed and to set
the wonders that he did, were now tempted to follow him, in the
hope of having that miracle repeated — their hunger again relieved
Sad in heart as he contrasted their eagerness in this direction with
their apathy in another, Jesus said to them, "Labor not for the meat
which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting
life, which the Son of man shall give you ; for him hath God the
Father sealed." A dim yet somewhat true idea of what Christ means
dawns upon the minds of his hearers. Accepting his rebuke, perceiv-
ing that he points to something required of them in order to promote
their higher and eternal interests; knowing no other way in which
this could be done than by rendering some service to God, but alto-
gether failing to notice the allusion to the Son of man and what they
were to get from him, " What shall we do," they say, "that we may
work the works of God?" 'tell us what these works are with which
God will be most pleased, by the doing of which we may attain the
everlasting life.' " This," said Jesus, " is the work of God, that ye
believe on him whom he hath sent." 'It is not by many works, nor
indeed, strictly speaking, by any thing looked at as mere work, that
you are to gain that end. There is one thing here which, primarily
and above all others, you are called to do : to believe on him whom
the Father hath sent unto you ; to believe on me : not simply to
credit what I say, but to put your supreme, undivided trust in me as
the procurer and dispenser of that kind of food by which alone your
souls can be nourished up into the life everlasting.' It was a large
and very peculiar demand on Christ's part, to put believing on himself
before and above all other things required. Struck with its singular-
ity, they say unto him, "What sign showest thou that we may see
and believe thee? what dost thou work?" 'If thou art really what
thou apparently claimest to be — greater than all that have gone be-
fore thee, greater even than Moses — show us some sign ; not one like
those already shown, which, wonderful as they have been, have been
but signs on earth; show us one from heaven like that of Moses,
"when our fathers did eat manna in the desert, as it is written, He
gave them bread from heaven to eat." ' ' You ask me' — such in envoi
is our Lord's reply — 'to prove my superiority to Moses by doing
something greater than he ever did; you point to that supply of the
manna as one of the greatest of his miracles. But in doing so you
make a twofold mistake. It was not Moses that gave that bread
2S8 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
from heaven. It came from a higher than he — from him who is my
Father, and who giveth still the true bread from heaven; not such
bread as the manna, which was distilled like the dew in the lower
atmosphere of the earth, which did not give life, but only sustained
it, and that only for a limited time and a limited number. The true
< bread of God is that* which conieth down from heaven, and giveth
life unto the world." '
Hitherto, Jesus had been speaking of a food or bread which he
and his Father were ready to impart; describing it as superior to
the manna, inasmuch as it came from a higher region and discharged
a higher office, supplying the wants, not of a nation, but of the
world ; yet still speaking of it as if it were a separate outward thing.
Imagining that it was something external, that eye could see, or hand
could handle, or mouth could taste, to which such wonderful quali-
ties belonged, with a greater earnestness and reverence than they
had yet shown, his hearers say to him, "Evermore give us this
bread." The time has come to drop that form of speech which Jesus
hitherto has used; to cease speaking abstractedly or figuratively
about a food or bread, to tell them plainly and directly, so that there
could be no longer any misunderstanding, who and what the meat
was which endure th unto everlasting life. "Then said he unto them,
I am the bread of life : he that cometh to me shall never hunger, and
he that believeth on me shall never thirst." 'I am not simply the
procurer or the dispenser of this bread, I am more — I am the bread.
If you would have it, you must not only come to me for it, but take
me as it. And if you do so — if you come to me and believe on me —
you shall find in me that which will fully and abidingly meet and sat-
isfy all the inward wants and cravings of your spiritual nature, all
the hunger and the thirst of the soul. Bring these to me, and it
shall not be as when you try to quench or satisfy them elsewhere
with earthly things, the appetite growing even the more urgent while
the things it feeds on become ever less capable of gratifying. Bring
the hunger and the thirst of your soul to me, and they shall be filled.
But ye will not do so, ye have not done so. "Ye have seen me, and
believe not." It may look thus as if my mission had failed, as if
few or none would come to me that they might have life ; but this is
my comfort in the midst of all the present and prevailing unbelief,
that, "all that the Father giveth me shall come to me," their coming
\o me is as sirre as their donation to me by the Father. But as sure
also as is his fixed purpose is this fixed fact, "him that cometh to me
I will in no wise cast out;" for I came down from heaven en nc
* Not "he," as in our translation.
THE DISCOURSE IN THE SYNAGOGUE. 289
separate or random errand of my own, to throw myself with unfixed
purposes amid unforeseen events to mould them to unknown or uncer-
tain issues. I came "not to do mine own will, but the will of him
that sent me;" and that will of his I carry out in rejecting none that
come to me, in throwing my arms wide open to welcome every one
who feels himself dying of a hunger of the heart that he cannot get
satisfied, in taking him and caring for him, and providing for him,
not letting him perish — no part of him perish, not even that which is
naturally perishable; but taking it also into my charge to change at
last the corruptible into the incorruptible, the natural into the spirit-
ual, redeeming and restoring the entire man, clothing him with the
garment meet for a blessed and glorious immortality; for "this is the
Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me
I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day."
Let me say it once again, that no man may think there lies any obsta-
cle to his salvation in a preformed purpose or decree of my Father,
that all may know how free their access to me is, and how sure and
full and enduring the life is that they shall find in me. "And this is
the will of him that sent me, that every one that seeth the Son and
believeth on him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up
at the last day. " ' Compare John 6 : 39, 40.
Overlooking all the momentous truths, all the gracious assurances
and promises that these words of Jesus conveyed, his hearers fix upon
a single declaration that he had made. Ignorant of the great mystery
of his birth, they murmur among themselves, saying, "Is not this Jesus
the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it, then,
that he saith, I came down from heaven?" Jesus does not answer
these two questions, any more than he had answered the question
they had put to him at first as to how he got to Capernaum. He
sees and accepts the offence that had been taken, the prejudice
that had been created, and he does nothing to remove it. He enters
into no explanation of the saying that he had come down from heav-
en; but he will tell these murmurers and objectors still more plainly
than he has yet done why it is that they stand at such a distance
and look so askance upon him. "Murmur not among yourselves."
1 Hope not by any such questions as you are putting to one another
to solve the difficulties that can so easily be raised about this or that
particular saying of mine. What you want is not a solution of such
difficulties, which are, after all, the fruits and not the causes of your
unbelief. The root of that unbelief lies deeper than where you would
place it. It lies in the whole frame and habit of your heart and life.
The bent of your nature is away from me. You want the desires, the
Life of Christ. 19
290 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
affections, the aims, the motives which would create within you the
appetite and relish for that bread which comes down from heaven.
You want that inward secret drawing of the heart which also cometh
from heaven, for "no man can come to me except the Father draw
him" — a drawing this, however, that if sought will never be with-
held; if imparted, will prevail, for '-it is written in the prophets, And
they shall be all taught of God. Every man, therefore, that hath
heard and learned of the Father cometh unto me." Not that you
are to imagine that you can go to him as you can go to me, that you
can see him without seeing me, can hear him without hearing me.
"Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God,
he hath seen the Father." It is in seeing me that you see the Father.
It is in hearing me that you hear the Father. It is through me that
the drawing of the Father cometh. Open eye and ear then, look
unto me, hear, and your soul shall live. "Verily, verily, I say unto
you, he that believeth on me hath everlasting life." He hath it now,
he hath it in me. "I am that bread of life." A very different kind of
bread from that of which you boast as once given of old through
Moses. "Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are
dead." The manna had no life in itself. If not instantly used, it
corrupted and perished. It had power to sustain life for a time, but
none to ward off death. The bread from heaven is life-giving and
death-destroying. "This is the bread which cometh down from
heaven, that a man may eat thereof and not die. I am the living
bread; if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever; and the
bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the
world."'
However puzzled about the expression of his coming down from
heaven, Christ's hearers might readily enough have understood him
as taking occasion from the recent miracle to represent himself, the
truths he taught, and the pattern life he led, as being for the soul of
man what the bread is for his body. But this change of the bread
into flesh, or rather, this identifying of the two, this speaking of his
own flesh as yet to be given for the life of the world, and when so
given to be the bread of which so much had been already said, star-
tles and perplexes them more than ever. Not simply murmuring, but
striving among themselves, they say, "How can this man give us his
flesh to eat?" a question quite akin to that which Nicoclemus put
when he said, " How can a man be born again when he is old?"
and treated by Jesus in like manner, by a repetition, in a still more
stringent form, of the statement to which exception had been taken:
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of
COURSE IN THE SYNAGOGUE. 291
man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you." To speak of eat-
ing his flesh was sufficiently revolting to those who understood him
literally ; but to Jewish ears, to those who had been so positively
prohibited all use of blood as food, how inexplicable, how almost
impious, must the speaking of drinking his blood have been. Indif-
ferent to the effect, our Lord goes on to repeat and reiterate, " Whoso
eatetli my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life ; and I will
raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my
blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my
blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent
me, and I live by the Father; so he that eateth me, even he shall
live by me."
Such, as I have attempted in the way of paraphrase to bring
them out to view, were the most salient points in our Lord's address,
and such the links by which they were united. Among all our Lord's
discourses in Galilee, this one stands by itself distinguished from all
the others by the manner in which Christ speaks of himself. No-
where else do you find him so entirely dropping all reserve as to hie
own position, character, services, and claims. Let him be the eternal
Son of the Father who veiled the glories of Divinity, and assumed
the garb of mortal flesh that he might serve and suffer and die for us
Dien and our redemption, then all that he here asserts, requires, and
promises appears simple, natural, appropriate. Let the great truths
of the incarnation and atonement be rejected, then how shall this
discourse be shielded from the charges of egotism and arrogance?
But Christ's manner of speaking to the people is here as unprece-
dented as the way of speaking about himself. Here also there is the
absence of all reserve. Instead of avoiding what he knew would
repel, he seems rather to have obtruded it : answering no questions,
giving no explanations, modifying no statements ; unsparingly expo-
sing the selfishness, ungodliness, unbelief of his auditors. The strong
impression is created that by bringing forth the most hidden myste-
ries of the kingdom, and clothing these in forms liable to give offence,
it was his purpose to test and sift, not the rude mass of his Galilean
hearers only, but the circle of his own diseipleship. Such at least
was its effect; for "many of his disciples, when they heard this, said.
This is a hard saying ; who can hear it?" Jesus does not treat their
murmuring exactly as he had that of the Jews; turning to them, he
says, 'Doth this about my coming down from heaven offend you?
but "what and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he
was before?" Doth this about eating my flesh and drinking my
blood offend you? "It is the spirit that ouickeneth;" the mere
292 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
flesh without the spirit profiteth nothing, hath no life-giving power.
It is by no external act whatever, by no outward ordinance or service,
that you are to attain to the life everlasting. It is by hearing, believ-
ing, spiritually coming to me, spiritually feeding upon me, that this is
to be reached. "The words that I speak unto you, they are the spirit
and they are the life." Still I know, for I must speak as plainly to
you as to the multitude, "that there are some of you that believe not.
Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it
were given unto him of my Father." ' To have hard things said, and
then to have the incredulity they generated exposed in such a way and
attributed to such a cause, was what many could not bear ; and so
from that time many of his disciples went back and walked no more
with him. With infinite sadness, such a sorrow as he only could feel,
his eye and heart follow them as they go away ; but he lets them go
quietly and without further remonstrance ; then, turning to the twelve,
he says, "Will ye also go away?" "Lord," is Peter's prompt reply,
" to whom shall we go ? Thou hast the words of eternal life." What
Jesus thought of this confession we shall see, when not long after-
wards it was repeated. Now he makes no comment upon it : bnt an
one upon whose mind the last impression of the day was that of sad-
ness over so many who were alienated from him, he closes the infcei-
view by saying, " Have I not chosen you twelve, and one of you is a
devil?"
Such were its immediate original results. What would be the
effect of a first hearing or first reading of this discourse now ? We
cannot well answer the question ; we have read and heard it so often,
its phrases are so familiar to our ears, the key to its darkest sayings
i^s in our hands. Nevertheless, are there not many to whom some of
its expressions wear a hard and repulsive aspect — are felt, though
they would scarcely acknowledge this to themselves, as overstrained
and exaggerated? It is not possible indeed to understand, much less
to sympathize with and appreciate, the fulness and richness of meaning
involved in many of these expressions, unless we look to our Lord's
death as the great propitiation for our sins, and have had some expe-
rience of the closeness, the tenderness, the blessedness of that mystic
bond which incorporates each living member of the spiritual body
with Christ the living head. Had Jesus spoken of himself simply
and alone as the bread of life, it had been possible to have under-
stood him as, setting forth his instructions and his example as fur-
nishing the best kind of nutriment for the highest part of our nature.
Even so strong a phrase as his flesh being the bread, might have
been interpreted as an allusion to his assumption of our nature, and
lata jjiSOOUESE 1^ lflnl SYKAGOUUK. 29S
to the benefits flowing directly from the incarnation. But when he
speaks of his flesh being given for the life of the world; when he
speaks of the drinking of his blood as well as of the eating of his
flesh; pronounces them to be the source at first and the support after-
wards of a life that cannot die, and that shall draw after it the resur-
rection of the body, it is impossible to put any rational construction
upon phrases like these other than that which sees in them a refer-
ence to our Lord's atoning death as the spring and fountain of the
new spiritual life to which through him all true believers are begotten-
But although the great truth of the sacrificial character of Christ'^
death be wrapped up in such utterances, it is not that aspect of it
which represents it as satisfying the claims of justice, or removing
governmental obstacles to the exercise of mercy, which is here set
forth, but that which views it as quickening and sustaining a new
spiritual life within dead human souls. In words whose very singu-
larity and reiteration should make them sink deep into our hearts,
our Saviour tells us that until by faith we realize, appropriate, con-
fide in him, as having given himself for us, dying that we might live,
until in this manner we eat his flesh and drink his blood, we have no
life in us. Our true life lies in union with and likeness unto God, in
peace with him, fellowship with him, harmony of mind and heart
ivith him, in the doing of his will, the enjoyment of his favor. This
life that has been lost we get restored to us in Christ. " He that
hath the Son hath life." We begin to live when we begin to love,
and trust, and serve, and submit to our Father who is in heaven;
when distance, fear, and doubt give place to filial confidence. We
pass from death unto life, when out of Christ there floweth the first
current of this new being into our soul. The life that thus emanates
from him is ever afterwards entirely dependent upon him for its main-
tenance and growth.
Every living thing craves food. It differs from a dead thing
in this, that it must find something out of itself that it can take
in, and by some process more or less elaborate assimilate to itself;
using it to repair the waste of vital energy, to build up the fife into
full maturity and strength. Such a thing as a self-originated, self-
enclosed, self-supporting life you can find nowhere but in God. Of
all the lower forms of life upon this earth, vegetable and animal, it is
true that by a blind, unerring instinct each seeks and finds the food
that suits it best, that is fitted to preserve, expand and perfect. It is
the high but perilous prerogative of our nature that we are left free to
choose our food. We may try, do try — have we not all tried, to
nourish our souls upon that which does not and cannot satisfy?
294 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
Business, pleasure, society, wealth, honor — we try to feed our sou]
with these, and the recurrent cravings of unfilled hearts tell us that
we have been doing violence to the first laws and conditions of oui
nature: a nature that refuses to be satisfied unless by an inward
growth in all goodness, and truth, and love, and purity, and holiness
It is to all of us, as engaged in the endless fruitless task of feeding
with the husks of the earth a spirit that pants after the glory, the
honor, and the immortality of the heavenly places, that Jesus comes
saying, " Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread,
and your labor f xr that which satisfieth not?" "I am the bread ol
life; my flesh is meat indeed, my blood is drink indeed."
Bread is a dead thing in itself; the life that it supports it did
nothing to originate. But the bread from heaven brings with it the
life that it afterwards sustains. Secret and wonderful is the process
by which the living organism of the human body transmutes crude
dead matter into that vital fluid by which the ever-wasting frame is
recruited and renrvigorated. More secret, more wonderful the pro-
cess by which tho fulness of life and strength and peace and holiness
that lie treasured up in the living Saviour passes into and becomes
part of that spiritual framework within the soul which groweth up
into the perfect man in Christ Jesus. In one respect the two pro-
cesses differ. In the one it is the inferior element assimilated by the
superior, the inorganic changed into the organic by the energy of
the latter ; in the other, it is the superior element descending into the
inferior, by its presence and power transmuting the earthly into the
heavenly, the carnal into the spiritual. There are forms of life which,
derivative at first, become independent afterwards. The child severs
itself from the parent, to whom it owes its breath, and lives though
that parent dies. The bud or the branch lopped off from the parent
stem, rightly dealt with, lives on though the old stem wither away.
But the soul cannot sever itself from him to whom it owes its second
birth. It cannot live disjointed from Christ, and the life it derives
from him it has all the more abundantly in exact proportion to the
closeness, the constancy, the lovingness of its embrace of and its
abiding in him.
Closer than the closest of all earthly bonds is the vital union of
the believer with Christ. One roof may cover those who are knit in
the most intLaate of human relationships. But beneath that roof
within that family circle, amid all the endearing intercourse and corn
munion, a dividing line runs between spirit and spirit; each dwells
apart, has a hermit sphere of its own to which it can retire, into
which none can follow or intrude. But what saith our Lord of the
THE DISCOURSE IN THE SYNAGOGUE. 295
connection between himself and each of hi-s own? "He ihat eateth
my flesh and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him." He
opens himself to us as the hiding-place, the resting-place, the dwell-
ing-place for our spirit. We flee unto him, and he hides us in the
secret of his presence, and keeps us secretly in that pavilion. What
* safe and happy home ! How blest each spirit that has entered it !
But more wonderful than our dwelling in him is his dwelling in us.
What is there in us to attract such a visitant? what room within our
souls suitable to receive him ? Should he come, should he enter,
what kind of reception or entertainment can we furnish to such a
guest? Yet he comes — he deigns to enter — he accepts the poor pro-
vision — the imperfect service. Nay, more : though exposed to many
a slight, and many an open insult, he still warts on; has pity, has
patience, forgets, forgives ; acts as no other guest in any other dwell-
ing ever acted but himself. " Behold, I stand at the door and knock.
If any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him,
and snp with him, and he with me." "If any man love me, he will
keep my words, and my Father will love him, and we will come unto
him, and make our abode with him."
To a still higher conception of the intimacy of the union between
himself and his own does Jesus carry us: "As the living Father
hath sent me, and I live by the Father, so he that eateth me shall
live by me." It would seem as if all the earthly imagery elsewhere
employed — that of the union of the branches with the vine, of the
members with the head, of the building wi-ih the foundation-stone —
however apt, were yet defective ; as if for the only fit, full emblem
Jesus had to rise up to the heavens to find it in the closest and most
mysterious union in the universe, the eternal, inconceivable, ineffable
union between the Father and himself — "That they all may be
one, as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be
one in us : I in them and thou in me, that they may be made perfect
in one."
There is a resemblance approaching almost to a coincidence be-
tween the language used in the synagogue of Capernaum and that
used in the upper chamber at Jerusalem. "The bread that I will
give," Jesus said to the promiscuous audience of Galileans, "is my
flesh, which I will give for the life of the world." "Take, eat," such
is his language m instituting the supper; "this is my body broken" —
or as St. Luke has it — "given for you." In either case the bread
turns into the flesh or body of the Lord. There had been no wine
used in the feeding of the five thousand, and so in the imagery of the
synagogue address, borrowed obviously from that incident, no men-
298 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
tion of wine was made. There was wine upon the supper-table at
Jerusalem, and so, just as the bread which was before him was taken
to represent the body, the wine was taken to represent his blood-
That eating of his flesh and drinking of his blood, of which so much
was said at Capernaum, Jesus, in instituting the ordinance of the
Supper, taught his disciples to identify with a true union with him-
self. So close is the correspondence that many have been led to
think that it was to the Eucharist, and to it exclusively that Jesus
referred in his Capernaum address. We cannot tell all that was then
rn our Saviour's thoughts. It may have been that in imagination he
anticipated the time when he should sit down with the twelve. The
holy communion may have been in his eye as he spake within the
Galilean s} nagogue. But there is nothing in what he said which points
to it alone. He speaks of the coming to him, the believing in him,
as the eating of the bread which is his flesh. He speaks of spiritual
life owing its commencement, as well as its continuance, to such
coming, such believing, such eating. Is it in the ordinance of the
Supper, and in it alone, that we so come and believe, eat and live?
Is there no finding and having, no feeding upon Christ but in the
holy sacrament ? Freely admitting that to no season of communion,
to no spiritual act or exercise of the believer, do the striking words
of our Lord apply with greater propriety and force than to that sea-
son and that act, when together we show forth the Lord's death till
he come again, we cannot confine them to that ordinance.
OUTLINE STUDIES. 296a
OUTLINE STUDIES.
A glance through the outline of this Study will make it clear that
Christ, while not suspending his gracious works of mercy and his public
teachings at times, is yet chiefly engaged in training the twelve. His
very strange method with the Syrophcenician woman may even find
a measure of its explanation in the Saviour's thought that when he at
last yields to the touching appeal of this member of the outside Gentile
world he will carry with him in his act the sympathies and approval
of this chosen band of Jewish men, as he might not have done if he had
at once received the woman with his accustomed outward kindness.
The leader can easily gather a rich cluster of features which reveal
their fitness to train the twelve, as the Master contrasts his ideals
with those of the Pharisees, as he commends or condemns first the
heavenly discernment and then the netherworld blindness of Peter,
or as he confirms faith by the splendors of the transfiguration.
PART II. MAIN MINISTRY IN GALILEE.
Study 10. Training Work with the Apostles.
(1) Points in which Christ differs from the Pharisaic standard. . 2966-298
a. The Pharisaic party watchful and intolerant 2966
6. They hold that one should not eat with unwashed hands 297
c. Christ retorts by citing their custom of Corban 297, 298
d. He states that real defilement is from within not from without 298
e. He affirms that they honor God with lips and not with heart 298
(2) Christ's retirement with the twelve into northern Galilee 299
(3) Healing the Syrophgenician woman's daughter 299-304
a. The woman a Gentile by race- and creed 299
6. The apparent coldness of Christ to her cry for help 300-302
c. Her faith rises sublimely above all rebuffs 300-303
d. Christ warmly commends her faith and grants her request 303, 304
(4) Circuit through Galilee and Decapolis 304-311
a. His course along the boundary of Galilee 304, 305
b. Farther course through Decapolis 305
c. Cure of the lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and others 305, 306
d. Feeding of the four thousand 306
e. Crossing the lake into Galilee, he is confronted by the Pharisees and
Sadducees 306
(5) Journey to Cesarea-Philippi 306-313
a. Crosses the lake to Bethsaida 306, 307
b. Warns the twelve against the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees. 307
c. Cures a blind man near Bethsaida 307
d. Aramaic words used by Christ recorded 307, 308
e. They show that he usually spoke Greek 309
/. The cases bear witness to Christ's graciousness 309-311
2966 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
(6) Peter's great confession near Cesarea-Philippi 312-320
a. The location described 312, 313
b. Christ's purpose to train his disciples 313
c. His question: "Whom do men say that I the son of man am?" 313
d. Peter's confession of faith: "Thou art the Christ, the son of the living
God" 314
e. Christ's commendation of Peter 315
/. Promise to him and the other apostles 316
g. Meaning of his words 316-320
(7) Christ foretells his death and resurrection 320-324
a. Prevalent false ideas of the Messiah 320, 321
6. Increasing minuteness of Christ's prediction of the closing scenes 321, 322
c. A proof of his foreknowledge 323
d. Why his words were misunderstood 323, 324
(8) Christ's rebuke of Peter 324-329
a. Peter's hasty and too presuming assertion that the things predicted
must not come to Jesus 324
b. It is like another temptation to avoid the way of the cross 324, 325
c. Christ utters the sharp rebuke because of the sharpness of this temp-
tation rather than the gravity of Peter's sin 324-326
d. He unfolds the principle of self-denial in order to service, of losing
one's life to save it 326, 327
e. Meanings of the expression about his coming in glory 327-329
(9) The transfiguration of Christ 329-336
a. Probable depression of Peter, James, and John 329
b. One of the lower peaks of Mt. Hermon 329
c. The ascent and Jesus' prayer 330
d. His transfiguration 330
e. Heavenly visitants and converse 330, 331
/. In what ways the event was of help 332-336
XII.
Pharisaic Traditions — The Syrophenician Woman.*
The Pharisaic party was well organized, watchful, and intoler-
ant. Its chief seat was in the capital, but it kept up an active cor-
respondence with and had its spies in all the provinces. Its bitter
hostility, aiming at nothing short of his death, which had driven
Jesus from Jerusalem, tracked his footsteps all through his Galilean
ministry. At an early period of that ministry, Pharisees from Jeru-
salem are seen obtruding themselves upon him, and now as it draws
near its close another company of envoys from the capital appears.
They come down after the Passover, inflamed by the reports carried
up to the feast of the open rupture that had taken place between
Christ and their brethren in Galilee. They come to find out some-
* Matt. 15 :T-28; Mark 7 : 1-30.
PHARISAIC TRADITIONS. 297
thing to condemn, and they have not long to wait. Watching the
conduct of Christ and his disciples, they notice what they think can
be turned into a weighty accusation against him before the people.
Seizing upon some opportunity, when a considerable audience was
present, they say to Jesus, "Why do thy disciples transgress the tra-
dition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat
bread." The oral or traditional law, with its multiplied precepts and
manifold observances which had grown up around the written code,
had come to be regarded as of equal, nay, in some respects, of supe-
rior importance. It was the wine, the rulers said, while the other
was but the. water. The acknowledgment of its authority forming
the peculiar distinctive badge of Pharisaism, such a weight was
attached to its observance that breaches of it were looked upon as
greater sins than breaches of the written law. Among these was
that of eating with unwashed hands. What with Persians, Greeks,
and Romans was but a social custom, the neglect of which was only
a social offence, had been raised among the Jews by the traditions of
the elders into a religious duty, the neglect of which was an offence
against God. And so strict were they in the observance of the duty,
that we read of a Jew of the Pharisaic type who, being imprisoned
and put on a short allowance of water, chose rather to die than not
to apply part of what was given to the washing of his hands before
eating. We can have now but an imperfect conception of how great
the sin was then thought to be with which those Pharisees from
Jerusalem charged publicly our Lord's disciples, aiming their real
blow at him by whose precept and example they had been taught to
act as they had done. " Why do thy disciples transgress the tradi-
tion of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat
bread." No explanation is given — no defence of his disciples is en-
tered upon. Our Lord has ceased to deal with such questioners as
being other than malignant enemies. He answers their question only
by another — "Why do ye transgress the commandment of God by
your tradition ?" And as they had specified an instance in which the
traditions of the elders had been violated by his disciples, he in turn
epecifies an instance in which they, by their traditions, had nullified
a commandment of God. No human duty was of clearer or more
stringent obligation than that by which a child was bound to honor,
love and help his father and his mother. The command enforcing the
duty stood conspicuously enshrined among the precepts of the Deca-
logue. But the elders in their traditions had found out a way of
reading it by which the selfishness, or the covetousness, or the ill-will
of a child might not only find room for exercise, but might cloak that
298 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
exercise under a religious garb. All that one, who from any evil
motive desired to evade the obligation of assisting his parents, had
to do, was to say "Corban" over that property on which his parents
might be supposed to have a claim — to declare it to be consecrated,
bound over to the Lord — and he was free. Father or mother might
no longer ask or hope for any thing at his hands. The property
might still be his. He might enjoy the life use of it ; but the vow
that destined it to God must come in before every other claim. So
it was that these traditionalists among the Jews of old quenched the
instincts of nature, gave place to evil passions, and broke one of the
first and plainest of the divine commands, all under a pretence of
piety. Nor has the spirit by which they were animated in doing so
ceased to operate ; nor have we far to go before an exact parallel
oan be found to the Jewish Corban practice, in the conduct of those
who, passing by their nearest relatives, whose very poverty supplies, it
may be, one of the reasons why they are overlooked, bequeath exclu-
sively to charitable or religious purposes the money that they cannot
carry with them to the grave. Neither charity nor piety, however
broad or pretentious the aspects they take, the services that they
may seem to render, can ever excuse such a trampling under foot of
the primary ties of nature and the moral duties connected with them.
And upon all those hospitals, and colleges, and churches that have
been erected and endowed by funds unnaturally and improperly
alienated from near and needy relatives, we cannot but see that old
Jewish word Corban engraved, and beneath it the condemning sen-
tence of our Lord — " Thus have ye made the commandment of God
of none effect."
No further answer will our Lord give to the Pharisees than this
severe retort. But first to the multitude, and afterwards to his dis-
ciples, he will say a word or two of that wherein all real defilement
consists — not in the outward, but in the inward ; its source and seat
within, and not without. In the evil affections, desires, and passions
of the heart — in these and what comes out of them pollution lies ;
not in eating with unwashed hands, nor in the violation of any mere
external, conventional, traditional usage.
Jesus had rolled back upon the Pharisees a weightier charge than
they had brought against his disciples. He had not hesitated openly
to denounce them to the people as hypocrites, applying to them the
words of the prophet, "This people draweth nigh unto me with their
mouth, and honoreth me with their lips; but their heart is far from
me." They were offended at being spoken to in such a way. Shun-
ning any further outbreak of their wrath, seeking elsewhere now the
THE SYROPHCENIOIAN WOMAN. 299
rest and the seclusion that he liad sought in vain on the eastern side
of the lake, Jesus retired to the borders of Tyre and Hidon. He went
there not to teach nor to heai, but to enjoy a few days' quiet and
repose in the lonely hilly region which looks down upon the two
ancient Phoenician cities. But he could not be hid. The rumor o!
his arrival in the neighborhood passed over the borders of the Holy
Land. It reached a pocr afflicted mother — a widow, it may have
been — whose little daughter was suffering under the frightful malady
of possession. This woman, we are told, was a Greek, a Syrophoe-
nician by nation — a Canaanite. Phoenician was the general name
given to a race whose colonies were widely spread in very ancient
times. One division of this race occupied the country from which
they were driven out by the Israelites ; and as that country bordered
upon Syria, they were called Syrophoenicians by the Greeks and
Romans. It was to this tribe that the woman belonged. She was
a daughter of that corrupt stock whom the Jews were commissioned
to exterminate. But besides being by nation a Canaanite, she was a
Greek ; this word describing not her country, but her creed. She
was a heathen, an idolatress — all such, of whatever country, being
then called Greeks by the Jews. Such then, by birth, by pedigree,
by religious faith and profession, was this woman, the first and only
Gentile — a Canaanite besides— who made a direct personal appeal
for help to Christ. The only case of a like kind that meets us in the
Galilean ministry was that of the Roman centurion. But he was
half a Jew. Moreover, living among Jews, he had his case presented
to Jesus by the rulers of the Jews, who had the plea to offer on hib
behalf, that he loved their nation, and had built them a synagogue.
Here, however, is a Gentile living among Gentiles, who has no Jew-
ish friends to intercede for her, no services rendered to the Jewish
people to point to. It is a pure and simple case of one belonging to
the great world of heathendom coming to Jesus. How is she re-
ceived? Her case, as she presents it to his notice, is of the very
kind that we should have said he would be quickest to sympathize
with and relieve. Meeting him by the way, she cries out in all the
eagerness of passionate entreaty, " Have mercy upon me, O Lord,
thou Son of David ; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil."
Jesus had opened willingly his ear to the nobleman of Capernaum
pleading for his son ; to Jairus pleading for his daughter ; the very
sight of the widow of Nain weeping over the bier of her only son had
moved him, unasked, to interfere. Here is another parent interceding
for a child. And that child's condition is one of the most pitiable—
in the tender years of girlhood visited with the most frightful of all
300 THE LIFE 0*' OHBIST.
maladies in one of the worst of its forms — grievously tormented with
a devil. Such a mother, in the agony of such a grief, crying out to
him to have compassion upon her and upon her poor afflicted child,
will surely not have long to wait. But he hears as though he heard
aot, He answers her not a word. The kindest of men are not always
squally open-eared, open-hearted, or open-ha,nded to the tale of sor-
row. Take them at some unlucky moment, and a cool or a rough
reception may await the most urgent of appeals. Has any thing like
this happened to our Lord ? Has his spirit been fretted with that
late contention with the Pharisees, wearied and worn with the kind
of reception his own had given him, so that ear and heart and hand
are all for the time shut up a.gainst this new and unexpected appeal
of the stranger? It cannot be. Liable as he was to all common
human frailties, our Lord was subject to no such moral infirmity as
that. Disappointment, chagrin, disgust never operated upon him as
they do so frequently on us — never quenched the benevolence of his
nature, nor laid it even momentarily asleep. We must look elsewhere
for the solution of the mystery of the silence — for mystery it was.
The disciples noticed it with wonder. Their Master had never
acted so since they had joined him — had never treated another as he
is treating the Canaanite. But though her cry be thus received,
making apparently no impression, moving him to no response, she
follows, she repeats her cry; continues crying till, half in real pity
for her and half with the selfish wish to be rid of her importunity,
the disciples came to him saying, " Send her away, for she crieth
after us." Not that they wanted her to be summarily dismissed, her
request ungranted. Christ's answer to this application shows that
he did not understand it in that sense; that he took it as expressive
of their desire that he should do what she desired and then dis-
miss her.
A rare thing this in the history of our Saviour, that he should
even seem to be less tender in his sympathy for the afflicted than his
disciples were, that he should need to be importuned by them to
a deed of charity. But all is rare here ; rare his silence, rare their
entreaty, and rare too the next step or stage of the incident. Still
heedless of the woman — neither looking at her nor speaking to her,
nor apparently feeling for her — Jesus answers his disciples by say-
ing to them, " I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of
Israel." He gives this as his reason for paying no attention to this
Gentile's request. And it is so quietly and calmly said, that it looks
like the expression of a firm and settled purpose. The poor suitoi
hears it. Does it not at once and for ever quench all hope within he/
THE SYROPHCENICIAN WOMAN. 301
breast ? His silence might have been due to the absorption of his
thoughts with other things. It might be difficult to win the atten-
tion or fix it on one who had so little claim on his regard. But no\*
she knows that he has heard, has thought of her, but wilfully, delib-
erately, as it would seem, has waved h,er suit aside. Child of a
doomed, rejected race, well mightest thou have taken the Saviour's
words as a final sentence, cutting off all hope, sending thee back
without relief to thy miserable home, to nurse thy frenzied child in
the arms of a dull despair. But there was in thee a depth of affec-
tion for that poor child of thine, and a tenacity of purpose that will
not let thee give up the case till effort after effort be made. There is
in thee, more than this, a keenness of intelligence, a quickness to dis-
cern, that, adverse as it looked, an absolute refusal did not lie wrap-
ped up in the Saviour's utterance. He is not sent to any but to the
lost sheep of the house of Israel ; but does that bind him to reject the
stray sheep of another fold, if perchance it may flee to him for suc-
cor? He comes as a servant, witli instructions to confine his per-
sonal ministry to the children of a favored race. But is he not a son
too as well as a servant ? Are his instructions so binding that in no
case he may go by a hand's-breadth beyond their line, when so going
may serve to further the great objects of his earthly mission ? She
will try at least whether she cannot persuade him to do so. Un-
dauntedly she follows him into the house into which she sees that he
lias entered, casts herself at his feet, and says, " Lord, help me !"
Before, she had called him Son of David, had given him the title
that, from intercourse with Jewish neighbors, she knew belonged to
him as the promised Messiah. But now she drops this title. As the
Son of David, he was not sent but to the Jews. She calls him, as
she worships, by the wider name, that carries no restriction in it,
gently intimating that as sovereign Lord of all, he might rise above
his commission, and go beyond the letter of the instructions he had
received. "Lord," she says, as she looks up adoringly, beseech-
ingly, " Lord, help me." She has got him at last to fix his eye upon
her. Will he, can he refuse to help ? Jesus looks and says, " Let
the children first be filled. It is not meet to take the children's meat,
and to cast it to dogs." Last and worst repulse. Bad enough to be
toll that she lay without the limits of his commission; but worse to
be numbered with the dogs. Yet still she falters not. She accepts
at once the reality, the justice, the propriety of the distinction drawn.
In the one household there were the children of the family ; there
were also the dogs, and it was right that they should be fed at dif-
ferent times on different food. In the great human household differ-
302 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ences of a like kind existed : there were the favored sons of Abr?v
ham ; there were the outcast children of Ham and Japhet. She nei-
ther disputes the fact nor quarrels with those arrangements of divine
providence under which a different treatment had been given to them ;
she takes the lowly place that Christ has given her among the out-
cast tribes — among the dogs! But have not the dogs and the chil-
dren all one master ? Do they not dwell all beneath one roof ? May
not even the dogs look for some little kindnesses at their master's
hands ? The finest and the choicest of the food it is right that the
childre?i should have, but are there no fragments for them ? " Truth,
Lord," she says, venturing in the boldness of her ardent faith to take
up the image that Jesus had used or had suggested, and to construct
out of it an argument, as it were, against himself — "Truth, Lord; yei
the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master's table."
' Truth, Lord, but thou art the Master ; and there dwells in thee
such a kind and loving heart, that I will not believe — no, not though
thine own words and deeds may seem to declare it — that the mean-
est creature in thy household will be overlooked or unprovided for.
Truth, Lord, I am not a child, and I ask not, expect not, deserve not
a child's favor at thy hands. I am but as a dog before thee, and it
is no part of the children's food ; it is but a crumb from thy richly
furnished table that I crave ; and what but such among all the rich
and varied blessings that thou hast come to lavish upon thine own —
what but such would be the having mercy upon the like of me, and
healing my poor afflicted child?' The Saviour's end is gained. It
was a peculiar case, and Christ had met it in a peculiar fashion. He
was about, still more distinctly and conspicuously than he had done
in the case of the Koman officer, by act and deed of his own hand,
to unfold the mystery that had been hid for ages, that the Gentiles
should be fellow-heirs with the Jews of the great spiritual inheritance
of his purchase. In doing so he desired to make it patent upon what
ground and principle the door of entrance was to be thrown open.
Here was a Canaanitish woman applying to him for help. The curing
of her daughter was to be the token that however limited for the time
his own personal ministry was to be, it was not to be fixedly and for
ever exclusive in its character — confined alone to Jews. Here was a
Canaanitish woman about to be numbered with those on whose
behalf bis divine power went forth to heal. To vindicate her admis-
sion within the sphere of his gracious operations, it was to be made
manifest that she too, by faith, was a daughter of faithful Abraham.
Therefore it was that her faith was subjected to such repeated trial,
that impediment after impediment was thrown before it, that it inighi
THE SYROPHOENICIAN WOMAN. 303
be thoroughly tested, and come forth from the ordeal shining in the
lustre of the fullest and brightest manifestations.
" woman," said Jesus to her, when the trial was over and the
triumph complete, " woman, great is thy faith! " Many things
besides had there been to commend in her — her strong maternal love,
her earnestness, her importunity, her perseverance, her deep humil-
ity. Over all these the Saviour passes, or rather he traces them all
up to their common root — her faith in him, her trust under all dis-
couragements, in front of all difficulties, in opposition even to his
own words and acts; her trust in his good will to her, in his disposi-
tion to pity and to help. This is what he commends, admires. Two
instances only are recorded in which Jesus passed such an approving
judgment, and looked with such admiring regard upon the faith of
those who came to him; and it is remarkable that they are those of
the two Gentiles — the Roman centurion and the Syrophcenician wom-
an. " Verily/' said he of the one, " I have not found so great faith;
no, not in Israel! " " Woman," said he to the other, " great is thy
faith." Great faith was needed in those who were the first to force
the barrier that ages had thrown up between Jew and Gentile, and
great faith in these instances was displayed. Of the two, however,
that of the purely Gentile woman was the highest in its character
and the noblest in its achievements. The Roman's faith was in the
unlimitedness of Christ's power — a power be believed so great that
even as he said to his soldiers, " Go! " and they went; " Come! " and
they came; " Do this! " and they did it — so could Jesus say to dis-
ease and life and death; curing at a distance! saving by the simple
word of his power! The faith of the Canaanite was not simply in
the unlimited extent of Christ's power. His power she never for a
moment doubted. He had no reason to say to her, ' Believest thou
that I am able to do this? ' But his willingness he himself gave her
some reason to doubt. Thousands placed as she was would have
doubted — thousands tried as she was would have failed. Which of
us has a faith in Jesus of which we are quite sure that it would come
through such a conflict unscathed? In her it never seems for a
moment to have faltered. In spite of his mysterious, unexampled
silence — of the explanation given of the silence that appeared to
exclude — beneath the sentence that assigned her a place among the
dogs, her faith lived on, with a power in it to penetrate the folds of
that dark mantle which the Lord for a short season drew around
him — to know and see that behind the assumed veil of coldness,
silence, indifference, repulse, reproach, there beat the willing, loving
heart, upon whose boundless benevolence she casts herself, trusting,
and not being afraid. This was her confidence, that there was more
304 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
love to her in his heart than the outward conduct of Jesus might
seem to indicate. It was this confidence which sustained her from
first to last. It was this confidence which carried her over all the
obstructions thrown successively before her. It was this confidence
which sharpened her wit, and gave her courage to snatch out of
Christ's own hand the weapon by which her last and greatest victory
was won. It was this confidence in him, in spite of all adverse ap-
pearances, which pleased the Lord so much — for he likes, as we all
do, to be trusted in — and which drew from him the unwonted expres-
sion at once of approval and of admiration, " O woman, great is thy
faith! " It is the same kind of simple trust in Jesus that we all need;
and in us too, if we but had it in like degree, it would accomplish
like blessed results. What the silence and the sentences of Jesus
were to that entreating woman, crying after Jesus to have her poor
child cured, his ways and his dealings, in providence and in grace,
are to us crying after him for the healing of our own or others' spir-
itual maladies. We cry, but he answers not a word; we entreat, but
he turns upon us a frowning countenance; when he speaks, his words
seem to cut us off from comfort and from help. But deal as he may
with us, hide himself as he may, speak roughly as he may, let us still
believe that there exists in the heart of our E,ecleemer a love to us,
upon which we can at all times cast ourselves in full, unbounded
trust.
"Woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt
And her daughter was made whole from that very hour."
XIII.
The Circuit through Decapolis.*
We have now to follow Jesus through one of the most singular of
his journeyings. His work in Galilee was done, but some days were
still left ere he set his face to go up to Jerusalem. These days were
devoted to a circuit which carried him in a semicircle round the west-
ern, northern, and eastern boundaries of Galilee, keeping him outside
the jurisdiction of Herod, and beyond the reach of the Jewish hierar-
chy. He was seeking for rest, seclusion, security, and he found them
where neither the mistaken attachment of his friends, nor the hate of
his enemies in Galilee, were likely to follow him. First he travelled
* Matt. 15 : 29-39; 16 : 1-12; Mark 7 : 31-37; 8 : 1-26.
THE CIRCUIT THROUGH DECAPOLIS. 305
over the liilly country that lies to the northwest of the sea of Tibe-
rias. There, as he was passing out of the Galilean territory, he met
the Syvophoenician woman, and by the manner of his treatment of
her revealed at once the simplicity, humility, tenacity of her faith,
and the wide embrace of his own love and power. Crossing the
boundary-line that divided Palestine from Phoenicia, passing the
ancient city of Tyre, he proceeded northward towards Sidon, getting
a glimpse there — it may have been a first and last one — of a country
in which some of the most ancient forms of heathenism still subsist-
ed, in the worship of Baal and Astarte. Then, turning eastward, he
crossed the southern ridge of Lebanon, descended into the valley of
the Leontes, skirted the base of the snow-capped Hermon, and some-
where not far from the sources of the Jordan, entered Decapolis.
This was the name given to a large and undefined region which lay
around ten cities, to which peculiar privileges were granted by the
Eomans after their conquest of Syria. All of these, with a single
exception, lay to the east and southeast of the sea of Galilee. At
length he came upon that sea, touching it somewhere along its east-
ern shore, not far, it may have been, from the place where he once
before, crossing from Capernaum, had landed for a few hours, and
where he cured the demoniac of Gadara. At the entreaty of the mul-
titude Jesus had then instantly retired, not suffering the man upon
whom the cure had been wrought to accompany him, but directing
him to go and tell what had happened to his family and friends.
"And he departed," we are told, " and began to publish in Decapolis
how great things Jesus had done for him; and all did marvel." The
rumor of that miracle was still fresh, the wonder it had excited had
not died away, when, coming through the midst of the coast of
Decapolis, Jesus sat down upon one of the mountains that overlook
the lake. The community through which he had been moving was
more than half heathenish, the Jewish faith and worship having but
little hold east of the river and the lake. Christ's appearance for the
first time among this rude and essentially Gentile population, and
the readiness with which he healed the deaf man that had an imped-
iment in his speech, produced the very effect which in such circum-
stances might have been anticipated. " Great multitudes came to
him, having with them those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed,
and many others," eagerly but somewhat roughly casting them down
at the feet of Jesus; wondering as at an altogether new sight,
beyond measure astonished when they saw the dumb made to
speak, and the blind to see, and the lame to walk, and glorifying,
not any of their own idols, but glorifying the God of Israel, in whoso
Life «.f OUrtat 20
306 THE LIFE OF OHEIST.
name and by whose power these great works were clone. Matt
15 : 30, 31,
Three days they crowded in upon Jesus, till about four thousand
men, beside women and children, were around him on the mountain-
side. Many of them had come from a distance, and the food that
they had brought with them was exhausted. That they might not
go fasting away from him, to faint, it might be, on the road, Jesus
repeated the miracle he had once wrought before, on the same side
of the lake, but at a different season of the year, and for an entirely
different sort of people. Among the coincidences and the differen-
ces in the narratives which the evangelists have given of these two
miraculous feedings of the multitudes, there is one not preserved in
our English version. After the five thousand were fed with the five
loaves and the two fishes, the disciples, we are told, took up twelve
baskets full of fragments. After the four thousand were fed with the
seven loaves and the few small fishes, seven baskets full of fragments
were gathered. In the Greek tongue there are two different words,
describing two vessels of different size and structure, both of which,
without any mark of distinction between them, our translators of the
Bible have rendered into the English word " basket." It is one of these
words which invariably and exclusively is used in describing the first
miracle, and the other which is as invariably and exclusively used id
describing the second. The employment in the two cases of two dif-
ferent kinds of vessel has thus been distinctly marked and preserved
as one of the slighter circumstantial peculiarities by which the two
events were distinguished from one another.
The multitude having been fed and sent away, Jesus took ship
and sailed across the lake, landing on its western shore between
Tiberias and Capernaum. He had scarcely reappeared in the neigh-
borhood in which most of his wonderful works had been w-rought,
when, once again, in their old spirit of contemptuous challenge, the
Pharisees demand that he would show them a sign from heaven.
Now, however, for the first time, the Sadducees appear by their side,
leaguing themselves with the Pharisees in a joint rejection of Christ—
in slighting all that he had already said and done — in counting it in-
sufficient to substantiate any claim on his pait to be their Messiah,
and in demanding the exhibition of some great wonder in the heav-
ens, such as, mis-reading some of the ancient prophecies, they falselj
thought should precede Christ's advent. Saddened and vexed, witfc
a word of stern rebuke to the men who stood tempting him, and a
deep sigh heaved over the whole village to which they belonged, Jesus
abruptly departed, embarking in such haste that the disciples forgot
THE CIRCUIT THROUGH DECAPOLIS. 307
to furnish themselves with the necessary supply of food. As they
landed on the other side, Jesus charged them to beware of the leaven
of the Pharisees and Sadducees. The pitiful simplicity which they
displayed in failing to see what Jesus meant, and in imagining that
because he had used the word "leaven?" it must be their having failed
to bring bread enough with them that he was pointing at, stirred the
gentle spirit of their Master, And Jed him to administer a more than
ordinarily severe rebuke, the main weight of which was laid, not upon
their stupidity in not understandiug him„but in their want of trust,
their forgetting how the many thousands had been provided for in
the desert and on the mountain-side.
At Bethsaida, to which place Jesus went on his way to Csesarea
Philippi, they brought a blind man to him, and besought him to
touch him. This case, and that of the deaf and stammering man
brought to him in Decapolis, have many points of resemblance. In
both, those who brought the diseased to Jesus prescribed to him the
mode of cure. They besought him to lay his hand upon them, or to
touch them. Was it for the very purpose of reproving and counter-
acting the prejudice which connected the cure with a certain kind of
manipulation on the part of the curer, that Jesus in both instances
went so far out of his usual course, varying the manner of his action
so singularly, that out of all his miracles of healing these two stand
distinguished by the unique mode of their performance? This at
least is certain, that had Jesus in any instance observed one settled
and uniform method of healing, the spirit of formalism and supersti-
tion which lies so deep in our nature would have seized upon it, and
linked it inseparably with the divine virtue that went out of him,
confounding the channel with the thing that the channel conveyed.
More and more as we ponder the life of our Redeemer, dwelling par-
ticularly on those parts of it — such as his institution of the sacra-
ments — in which food might have been furnished upon which the
spirit of formalism might have fed, more and more do we wonder at
the pains evidently taken to give to that strong tendency of our nature
as little material as possible to fasten on.
Besides, however, any intention of the kind thus alluded to, the
variations in our Lord's outward modes of healing may have had
special adaptation to the state of the individuals dealt with, and may
have been meant to symbolize the great corresponding diversity that
there is in those spiritual healings of which the bodily ones were un-
doubtedly intended to be types. Let us imagine that the deaf stam-
merer of Decapolis was a man whose spiritual defects were as com-
plicated as his physical ones ; whose hard, unclean heart it was sin-
308 THE LIFE OF OHEIST.
gularly difficult to reach and to renew; who required repeated efforts
to be made, and a varied instrumentality to be employed, before he
yielded to the power of the truth, or was brought under its benignant
sway. Then see with what picturesque fidelity and appropriateness
t'he slowness and difficulty of the one kind of healing was shadowed
forth in the other. Jesus took him aside from the multitude, went
away with him alone into some quiet and secluded place. The very
isolation — the standing thus alone face to face, was of itself fitted to
arrest, to concentrate the man's thoughts upon what was about to
happen. Then Jesus put his fingers into his ears, as if by this very-
action he meant to indicate the need there was of an operation which
should remove the obstruction, and that his was the hand to do it.
Then with a like intent he touched the man's dry and withered
tongue with fingers moistened with his own spittle. Then he looked
up to heaven and sighed — the sigh unheard — but the look upward,
and the emotion which it conveyed, not lost upon the man. Then
after all these preliminaries, in course of which we may believe that
whatever of incredulity or whatever of unbelief there may have lain
within was being gradually subdued, at last he said, Epliphatha, and
the ears were opened and the tongue was loosed.
Two things here were peculiar, the sigh and the preserving the
old Aramaic word which Jesus used. Never in any other instance
but in this, when Jesus was about to heal, did a sigh escape from his
lips. What drew it forth here ? It may have been that as he drew
the man aside and confronted him alone, the sorrowful spectacle that
he presented became to the quick sympathies of Jesus suddenly and
broadly suggestive of all the ills that flesh is heir to, and that it was
over them collectively that the sigh was heaved. Such interpretation
of its meaning leaves unexplained why it was this case, and it alone,
which acted in such a manner upon the sympathies of the Redeemer.
But the sigh may have had a deeper source. If this were indeed a
man whose soul was difficult of reach and cure, he may have pre-
sented himself to Jesus as the type and emblem of those obstinate
cases of spiritual malady, some of which would so long resist the
great remedy that he came to the earth to furnish.
After the sigh came the utterance EjjnnJiatha, a word belonging
to that dialect of the old Hebrew language called the Aramaic, or
Syro-Chaldaic, which was then current in Judea. But if that was
the language which Christ ordinarily used — in which, for example,
the Sermon on the Mount was spoken — why was it that in this and
one or two other instances, and in these alone, the exact words which
Christ employed are preserved in the evangelic record? It cannot
THE CIRCUIT THROUGH DECAPOLIS. 309
be the peculiarity or solemnity of the occasion, or the particular
emphasis with which they were spoken, that entitled them to be
selected and preserved, for we can point to many other occasions in
allien, had Jesus used Aramaic words, they would have had as good,
In leed a better claim to have been preserved. The true explanation
)f Jiis matter seems to be that it was only upon a few occasions that
Jesus did employ the old vernacular tongue — and that he ordinarily
spoke in Greek. It has recently, and as I think conclusively, been
established by a great variety of proof, that in the days of our
Saviour, the Jews knew and spoke two languages; all the grown-up
educated population using the Greek as well as the Aramaic tongue.
The Greek predominated in the schools, was employed almost exclu-
sively in written documents and by public speakers. It was in this
language that Jesus addressed the crowds in the courts of the temple
at Jerusalem, and the multitudes on the hillsides of Galilee. We
have, therefore, in our Greek New Testament the very words before
us which came from the lips of our Eedeemer — more sacred, surely,
than if they had been translated from the Aramaic, however faithful
the rendering. Assuming that Greek was the language ordinarily
employed by our Saviour, it would very naturally occur that occa-
sionally he reverted to the old dialect, and that when he did so the
words that he used should have been preserved and interpreted.
Thus, for instance, in the house of Jairus, Jesus was in the home of
a strictly Jewish family, in which the old language would be used in
all domestic intercourse, the little daughter who lay dead there hav-
ing not yet learned perhaps the newly imported tongue. "How
beautifully accordant then with the character of him whose heart was
tenderness itself, that as he leaned over the lifeless form of the maiden,
and breathed that life-giving whisper into her ear, it should have
been in the loved and familiar accents of the mother tongue, saying,
'Talitha, cumi!' Although dead and insensible the moment before
the words were uttered, yet ere the sound of them passed away there
was life and sensibility within her. Does not every reader perceive
the thoughtful tenderness of the act, and a most sufficient reason
why it was in Hebrew and not in Greek that our Lord now address-
ed her ? And do we not also discover a cause why the fact of his
having done so should be especially noticed by the evangelist ? Are
we not thus furnished with a new and affecting example of our Sav-
iour's graciousness? And do we not feel that St. Mark, the most
minutely descriptive of all the evangelists, deserves our gratitude
for having taken pains to record it? Softly and sweetly must the
tones of that loving voice, speaking in the language of her childhood,
310 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
have fallen upon the sleeping spirit of the maiden, and by words oi
tenderness, no less than words of power, was she thus recalled to life
and happiness."*
It was perhaps still more natural that Jesus, in addressing the
deaf stammerer of Decapolis, should have used an Aramaic word-
He was a rude mountaineer. The vernacular was perhaps the only
language of which he had any knowledge. At any rate, it was the
one to which he had been the most accustomed. It could have been
solely with regard to the man himself th-at Jesus employed the par-
ticular term Ephpliatha. He meant him to hear and understand it.
And it was heard, we believe, and understood; for this was not a
case in which the faculty of hearing and speaking had never existed
or been exercised. So soon as the physical impediments were re-
moved, the man could speak as he had spoken before the loss of
hearing had been incurred. When, after all the other signs of the
coming cure had been given, the emphatic word was at last pro-
nounced, how wise, how gracious was it that that word — the first
heard after so many years — should have been one of his well-known,
well-loved mother-tongue !
But let us turn now for a moment to the cure of the blind man at
Bethsaida. Here, too, we may believe that there was something
special in the spiritual condition of the man meant to be typified by
the manner of his cure. In the taking of him by the hand, the lead-
ing out of the town, the spitting upon his eyes, and putting his hands
upon him, Jesus may have had the same objects in view which he had
in acting in a similar manner with the deaf man at Decapolis, and
the man born blind in Jerusalem ; but there was a singularity that
marks this case from all the others. It is the only instance of prog-
ress in a cure by half and half, of an intermediate stage in the first
instance reached. Jesus asked him if he saw aught. He looked up
and said that he saw men as trees walking. He saw them — knew
them to be men — noticed and described their motion ; but they were
shapeless to his eye — looked rather like trees than men. It is this
circumstance which leads us to believe that he had not been blind
from birth. To endow a man born blind with the full powers of
vision requires a double miracle — one upon the bodily organ, restor-
ing to it its powers ; one upon the mind, conf erring upon it the
faculty that in the years of infancy a long education is required to
impart. A youth who had been blind from birth was couched by
Cheselden; but at first and for some time he could not distinguish
one object from another, however different in shape or size. He had
* See Roberts' "Discussions on the Gospel," pp. 89, 90.
THE CIECUIT THROUGH DECAPOLIS. 311
to be told what the things were, with whose forms he had been famil-
iar from feeling, and slowly learned to recognize them. And slowly
was it that we all in our earliest days learned how to use the eye, and
turn it into the instrument of detecting the forms and the magni-
tudes and the distances of the objects by which we wore surrounded.
But here — unless, indeed, we believe that there was a double mira-
cle — so soon as the man got the full power of bodily vision, he knew
how to use it, having learned that art before. It pleased the Saviour,
however, to convey again its lost powers to the organ of the eye step
by step. There was at first a confusion of the outward forms of things
arising from some visional defect. That defect removed, all was
clear; and the subject of this miracle rejoiced in the exercise of a
long-unused and almost forgotten faculty. It stands a solitary kind
of cure in the bodily healings of our Lord ; but that of which it is
the type is by no means so rare. Rather, the rare thing is when any-
thing like full power of spiritual perception is at once bestowed. It
is but slowly here that the lost power comes back — that the eye opens
to a true discernment of the things of that great spiritual world of
which we form a part — sees them in their exact forms, in their rela-
tive magnitudes, distances, proportions. Even after the inward eye
has been purged of all those films which limit and obscure its sight,
a long, a careful, a painstaking education is required to train it, as
our bodily one in infancy was trained. Nor let us wonder if along
the many stages of which this education is made up, we often make
singular discoveries of how blind we were before to what afterwards
seems clear as day, or that the operations are often painful by which
a truer, and a deeper, and a wider spiritual discernment is attained,
It is the blessed office of our Saviour at once to restore to the inward
eye its power, and to teach us how to use it. Into his hands let us
ever be putting ourselves; and let us quietly and gratefully submit
to that discipline by which our training in the exercise of all oui
spiritual faculties is carried on.
S12 THE LIFE OF OHEIST.
XIV.
The Apostolic Confession at C^sarea-Philippi.*
In the mythology of the Greeks the worship of Pan— their sylvan
deity — was always associated with shady cave or woody grotto. The
first Grecian settlers in Northern Syria lighted there upon a spot
singularly suited for such a worship — a cave at the southern base of
Mount Hermon, and at the northeastern extremity of the valley of the
Jordan. This cave lay immediately behind a raised yet retired nook
or hollow among the hills, and immediately beneath a conical height
of more than one thousand feet, rising between two of those deep ravines
which run up into the great mountain, upon the summit of which
height there now stand the noblest ruins that the whole country
around exhibits ; equal in extent, if not in grandeur, to those of Hei-
delberg — the ruins of the Saracen castle of Zubeibeh. Immediately
beneath the entrance into this cave — along a breadth of more than
one hundred feet — there gush forth from among the stones a thousand
bubbling rills of water, coming from some hidden fountain-head, and
from their long, dark, subterranean journey springing all joyously
together into the light of day, forming at once by their union a stream
which is one of the chief heads or sources of the Jordan. This lively
and full-born stream does instantly a stream's best eastern work —
clothes its birthplace with exuberant fertility, shadowing it with the
foliage of the ilex and the olive ; covering its green swards with flow-
ers of every name,, turning it into such a scene that, lost in admira-
tion, Miss Martineau declares that, out of Poussin's pictures, she
never saw any thing in the least like it, while Dr. Stanley calls it a
Syrian Tivoli.
This chosen spot the first Grecian settlers seized upon and con-
secrated, making the cave Pan's sanctuary, cutting niches for the
nymphs out of the solid rock which forms the face of the mountain-
side ; which niches — the statues that once occupied them gone — are
still to be seen there ; and called the place Panias, from the name of
the deity there worshipped. The Romans, when they came, did not
overturn this worship, but they added a new one. Returning to this
beautiful nook from having escorted Caesar Augustus to the sea,
Herod the Great erected a fine temple of white marble to his great
patron. One of his sons, Herod Philip, in whose territory, as tetrarch
«£ Iturea and Trachonitis, it was included, extended and embellished
Matthew 16:1 ft- 19.
THE APOSTOLIC CONFESSION. 313
the town which had grown up near the old cavern sanctuary. Think-
ing to change its name, he called it CsBsarea-Philippi, in honor of
the Koman emperor, with his own name added, to distinguish it from
the Csesarea on the seacoast. This new name it bore for a few gen-
erations, but the old one revived again, and still belongs to it under
the Arabic form of Banias.
It was to this Banias, or Csesarea-Philippi, that our Lord pro-
ceeded, passing through Bethsaida, and up along the eastern banks
of the Jordan. In that circuit already described he may have visited
it, and the attractions of the place may have drawn him back, or this
may have been his first and only visit. It can scarcely be believed
that he came into the few scattered villages which lay around, and
the remains of which are still visible, without entering Csesarea-Phi-
lippi itself. His presence there, out of Judea, in a district covered
with tokens of heathen worship, his standing before that cave, his
gazing upon those buildings, those niches, those inscriptions now in
ruins and defaced, but then telling, in their freshness, of idolatries
still in living power, carries Jesus farther away from Judaism, and
brings him into nearer outward contact with Gentile worship than
any other position in which we see him in the gospel narrative. It
were presumptuous in us, where no clue is given, to imagine what
the thoughts and intents of the Saviour were ; yet when we find him
going so far out of his way, choosing this singular district as the
place of his temporary sojourn after all his public labors in Galilee
were over ; when we reflect further that now a new stage of his min-
istry was entered on, and that henceforth from teaching the multi-
tudes he withdrew, and gathering his disciples around him in pri-
vate, began to speak to them as he had never done before, it is
impossible to refrain from cherishing the idea that, surround 3d now
by the emblems of various faiths and worships, types of tha motley
forms of superstition that had spread all over the earth, tin, thoughts
of the Eedeemer took within their wide embrace that wjrld whose
faith and worship he had come to purify, and that he hod, in fact,
purposely chosen, as in harmony with this epoch of his life, and the
purposes he was about to execute, the unique, secluded, romantic
district of Ca3sarea-Philippi.
He was wandering in one of its lonely roads with his disciples,
his sole companions, when he left them for a little while to engage in
solitary prayer, (Luke 9 : 18,) to commit himself and his great work,
as it was passing into a new stage, to his Father in heaven. On
rejoining them, he put to them the question, " Whom do men say
that I the Son of man am ?" He knew it already, but for a further
314 THE LIFE OF CHBIST.
purpose he would fain have from their lips what the gross result of
those two years' toil and teaching was — what the ideas were about
himself, his person, character, and office, which his fellow-country-
men now generally entertained. They told him — more than one of
them taking part in the reply — that some said that he was John the
Baptist ; some that he was Elias ; some Jeremiah ; some, without deter-
mining which, that he was one of the prophets. His own immediate
followers had got somewhat further in their conceptions. Listen-
ing to and believing in, though not fully understanding the testi-
mony of the Baptist, Andrew had said to his own brother Simon,
"We have found the Messiah, which is, being interpreted, the Christ;"
and Nathanael, remembering what the voice from heaven at the bap-
tism had been reported as declaring, had exclaimed, " Rabbi, thou
art the Son of God : thou art the King of Israel." Here and there,
by dumb and blind men and Syrophcenician women, he had been
hailed as the Son of David or the Son of God. On the first impulse
of their wonder at all being miraculously fed, five thousand men were
ready in the moment to say of him that he was the prophet that
should come into the world. But these were the exceptions — excep-
tions so rare that they seemed not to his disciples worthy of account.
Amid all the variety of impressions made upon them by the discourses
and works of our Lord, the great mass of the people in Judea and in
Galilee regarded Jesus as the Messiah's forerunner or one of his her-
alds, not as the Messiah himself. It was the popular belief of the
period that, prior to the Messiah's advent, one or other of the proph-
ets was to rise again from the dead. This Jesus might be he. The
Pharisees had not succeeded in shaking the public confidence in him
as a pure and holy man, well worthy to be counted as a prophet.
But they had prevailed in scattering the first impressions that the
Baptist's ministry and his own words and deeds had created, that he
was indeed the Christ. And now from the lips of his own followers
Jesus hears, what was so well fitted to try their faith and their Mas-
ter's patience, that scarcely anywhere over all the land was there any
recognition of the Messiahship of Jesus.
On getting their answer, no word of reproach or complaint escapes
the Saviour's lips. It was not indeed on his own account, it was on
theirs, that his first question had been put. He follows it with the sec-
ond and more pointed one : " But whom say ye that I am ?" Peter, the
ever-ready answerer, replies, " Thou art the Christ, the Son of the
living God." Peter had believed, from the beginning of his connec-
tion with him, that Jesus was the Christ; a faith which had the great
Mid acknowledged authority of the Baptist to rest on, and which was
THE APOSTOLIC CONFESSION. 315
borne up by the hope that the whole nation would speedily accept
bim as such. But in the Baptist's death, that authority has been vio-
lently shaken, and the outward and expected support has utterly given
way. Many of the Lord's disciples have forsaken him, and looking
all around, Peter can find few now who so believe. Yet, amid all
the prevailing unbelief in and rejection of his Master, Peter's faith has
oeen gaining and not losing strength. Like the inhabitants of Sychar,
he believed not because of what any one had told him, but upon the
ground of what he himself had seen and heard and known of Jesus.
" Thou art the Christ." - Such the Baptist said thou wert — such, though
thou hast never expressly put forth the claim — such thy words and
works have been ever asserting thee to be — and such thou truly art.'
Thus it is that in his good confession Peter suffers not the fickle faith
and low conceptions of the multitude to affect him. Though he and
his few companions stand alone, with the whole community against
them, for himself and for them he will speak out and say, " Thou art"
— not any one of those prophets, however honorable the name he
bears — " Thou art the very Christ himself — the Messiah promised to
our fathers."
But still another step, in taking which Peter not only confronts
the existing state of popular belief as to who Jesus is, but goes
far on in advance of the existing Jewish faith as to who and what
their Messiah was to be. " Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living
God." We know from sufficient testimony that the Jews universally
imagined that their Messiah was to be but a man, distinguished for his
virtues and exalted in his office, but still a man. There has dawned
on Peter's mind the idea that Jesus the Christ is something more —
something higher. The voice from heaven had called him the Son
of God ; Satan and his host had taken up and repeated the epithet.
What that title fully meant we may not, cannot think that Peter now,
or till long afterwards, understood ; but that it indicated some mys-
terious indwelling of the Divinity — some mysterious link between
Jesus and the Father which raised him high above the level of our
ordinary humanity, even when endowed with all prophetic gifts — he
was beginning to comprehend. Obscure though his conceptions
were, there stood embodied in his great confession a testimony to
the mingled humanity and divinity of Jesus. In the faith which
thus expressed itself, Jesus saw the germ of all that living faith bj
which true believers of every age were to be animated — that faitL
the cherishing of which within its bosom was to form the very life and
strength of the community, the Church, which he was to gather out
from among the nations — the fruit of God's own work within human
316 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
souls. Seeing this, and being so far satisfied — rejoicing in the assur-
ance that whatever other men might think or say of him, there were
even now some human spirits within which he had got a hold that
nothing could shake, against which nothing would prevail — he turns
to Peter and says, " Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona." Simon
Bar-jona ! — the very way in which he named him preparing us for
words of weighty import being about to be addressed to him. Simon
Bar-jona, blessed art thou ! I know not if Jesus Christ ever pro-
nounced such a special individual blessing on any other single man ;
and when we hear one of our race called blessed by him who knows
so well wherein the best and highest happiness of our nature con-
sists, our ear opens wide to catch the reason given for such a bene-
diction being pronounced. "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona, for
flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which
is in heaven." ' Thine own eye hath not seen it, thine own ear hath
not heard it — it hath not come to thee by any ordinary channel from
without — it is not due alone to an exercise of thine own spirit within.
Faint though the light be that has gleamed in upon thy soul and
lighted up thy faith — faint as the feeblest glimmer of the mom — it is
a light from heaven, a dawn giving promise of a bright and cloud-
loss day. It hath come as a revelation from the great Father of
spirits to thy spirit, Simon Bar-jona ; and therefore a blessed man
art thou !' And blessed still in the Saviour's judgment — blessed be-
yond all that this world has in it of blessedness to bestow — is he
upon whose darkened mind and heart the faintest rays of that same
heavenly light have shone — the God who commanded the light to
shine out of the darkness, shining in upon his soul, giving him the
light of the true knowledge of God in Christ his Saviour !
" And I say also unto thee." ' Thou hast said to me, "Thou art
the Christ," and hast shown that thou knowest what is the true
meaning of the word ; so now say I unto thee, " Thou art Peter ;" the
name of my own giving, the fitness of whose application to thee thou
art even now justifying in thy prompt and bold confession, in thy full
and resolute faith, in thy firin and immovable adhesion to me, despite
of all that men think and say of me. Thou art a true Petros — a liv-
ing stone built upon me, the true Peira, the living and eternal rock —
the only sure foundation in which you and all may build then trust
and hopes. And upon thee, as such a stone resting on such a rock,
as having so genuine and strong a faith in me as the Son of man and
Son of God, I will build my church. Because of this thine early, full,
and heaven-implanted faith, thou shalt be honored as one of the first
foundation-stones on which my church shall be erected. That church
THE APOSTOLIC CONFESSION. 317
shall be the congregation of men who share thy faith — who all are
Peters like thyself — all living stones built upon me as the chief cor-
ner-stone ; and in a sense, too, built upon thee ; on prophets and
apostles as laid by me and on me, to form the basis of the great spir-
itual edifice — the temple of the church.'
But if the church was to consist of those who believed in Jesm as
Peter did, where was the promise that it should number many with in
its embrace ? What the security that it should have any firm or last-
ing hold ? Was not Jesus at this moment a wanderer — despised and
rejected — driven forth from among his own — surrounded in this place
of his voluntary exile among the Gentiles by a few poor fishermen ?
Where was the earthly hope that the circle of true believers in him
should widen ? What the prospect that if it did, it could hold its
ground against all the gathered enmity that was rising to pour itself
out against it ? Calmly, out of the midst of all these unpropitious and
unpromising appearances, the words issue from the lips of Jesus, " J
will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it." The history of eighteen centuries has confirmed the truth of the
saying. So long has this society of Christian men existed; and
though it has done much to provoke hostility, and been often very
unmindful of the spirit and will of him whose name it bears, yet all
that power and policy, the wiliest intrigues and the fiercest persecu-
tion could do against it, have been done in vain.
This is the first occasion on which Jesus used that word — the
church ; and he named it in his own lifetime but once again. He did
every thing to lay the true and only foundation of that church ; but
he did almost nothing with his own hand to erect or organize it.
Apart from his selecting twelve men to be his personal associates, his
institution of the office of the apostolate, which there are but few
who regard as an integral and perpetual part of the church's organi-
zation — apart from that and his appointment of the two sacraments,
Jesus may be said to have done nothing towards the incorporation of
those attached to him into an external institute. Even here, when he
goes to address a few words of encouragement to Peter, upon whom
so important services in this department were to devolve, he speaks
not of the present but of the future : " I will give unto thee the keys
of the kingdom of heaven." 'When that time comes at which, on the
great day of Pentecost, the first admissions into my church by bap*
tism shall take place, then know that the keys of my kingdom are in
thy hand, and that thou mayest use them in the full assurance thai
thou art not acting without a due warrant.' Keys are the badges ol
authority and power and trust, bestowed as the symbols of the office
318 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
on ministers or ambassadors, secretaries or treasurers of kingdoms,
on whom the duty lies of admitting to, or excluding from, the privi
leges and benefits of the commonwealth, disposing or withdrawing
the royal bounties and favor. Such keys — in a manner appropriate
to the kind of commonwealth the church is — Jesus here commits to
Peter, as one of the first and greatest of its office-bearers. In the
use of any such authority and power as had been given him within
the church — in admitting to or excluding from its privileges — in taking
his part in the baptism of the three thousand on the day of Pente-
cost—in condemning Ananias and Sapphira — in censuring Simon
Magus — in opening the door to take in the Gentile converts, and pre-
siding at the baptisms in the household of Cornelius — Peter might
be weighed down by the sense of the feebleness of the instrument he
was using, the smallness of the effects that it could produce. To
comfort and encourage him in the use of the keys when they came to
be employed by him, Jesus adds, " Whatsoever thou shalt bind on
earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt loose on
earth shall be loosed in heaven." 'Act but in the right spirit — follow
out the directions given — let the law of truth and love but regulate
your doings, and you may rest assured that doings of yours on earth
shall be approved and ratified in heaven.' So far, and no farther, as
it seems to us, do the words of our Saviour, as addressed to Peter, go.
You are aware that it is upon these words — and upon them almost
exclusively, for there is no other passage of any thing of a like import
in the evangelic narrative — the church of Eome claims for St. Peter
and his alleged successors in the see of Eome a primacy or popedom
over the universal church of Christ. Upon this claim, so far as it is
attempted to be erected upon this passage, I have to remark :
1. It is singular that of the three evangelists who have recorded
our Lord's question to the apostles, and St. Peter's reply, St. Mat-
thew is the only one who has added that which Jesus said to him
after his good confession had been made. Had our Lord's object in
putting the question been to elicit the confession in order thereupon
to confer certain peculiar honors and privileges upon St. Peter above
all the other twelve, would St. Mark and St. Luke have stopped short
as they do at the confession, and said not a word about Peter and the
rock — the keys and the kingdom? It is quite true that in many a
narrative two of the evangelists omit what the third has recorded ;
but it is never true, as it would be true here if the Roman-catholic
interpretation of the passage be adopted, that all three give the ini-
tial or introductory part of a narrative, but that one alone supplies
that in which the main scope and object of the whole consists.
THE APOSTOLIC CONFESSION. 319
2. The claim for a primacy of authority over the other apostles,
put forward on behalf of St. Peter, rests on the assumption that he,
and he exclusively, is the rock upon which the church is said to rest.
I will only say, that as a mere matter of exegesis — that is, of inter-
pretation of words — it is extremely difficult to say precisely what the
rock was to which Christ alluded. From the beginning, from Jerome
and Origen down to our own times, there has been the greatest diver-
sity of opinion. Did Jesus mean to say that Peter himself — individ-
ually and peculiarly — was the rock ? or was it the confession that he
had just made, or was it the faith to which he had given expression,
or was Jesus pointing to himself when he spoke of this rock, as he
did elsewhere when he spake of this temple — this shrine — in refer-
ence to himself ? I have already offered the explanation that appears
to me the most simple and natural, as flowing not so much out of a
critical examination of the words as out of a consideration of the
peculiar circumstances and conditions under which the words were
spoken ; but I cannot say that I have offered that explanation with-
out considerable hesitation — a hesitation mainly arising from the fact
which does not appear in our English version, that Jesus used tw T o
different words — Petros and Petra — in speaking as he did to the
apostle. A claim which rests upon so ambiguous a declaration can
scarcely be regarded as entitled to our support.
3. Whatever ambiguity there may be now to us, there could have
been no such ambiguity in the words of Christ to those w r ho heard
them. They must have known whether or not Jesus meant to desig-
nate Peter as the rock — to elevate him to a peculiar and exalted posi-
tion above his brethren. And yet we find that three times after this
the dispute arises among them which should be the greatest — a dis-
pute which never could have arisen had Jesus already openly and
distinctly assigned the primacy to St. Peter — and a dispute, we may
add, which never would have been settled as Jesus in each case settled
it, had any such primacy been ever intended to be conveyed by him.
4. Even admitting that all that is said here was said personally
and peculiarly of Peter, where is the warrant to extend it to his suc-
cessors ? If his associates, his fellow-apostles, be excluded, how can
his successors be embraced? It is ingeniously said here by Roman-
ists that if St. Peter be the foundation of the Church, then as that
foundation must abide, there ever must be one to take his place and
keep up as it were the continuity of the basis of the building. But
this is to have, not one stone as the foundation, but a series of stones
laid alongside or upon one another; and where is there a hint of such
a thing?
320 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Fifthly, and chiefly. All that is said here to Peter was said twioo
afterwards by Christ to all the twelve and to all the church. You
have but to turn to the eighteenth chapter of St. Matthew, and read
there the eighteenth and nineteenth verses, and to the gospel of St.
John, and read there in the twentieth chapter, from the nineteenth
to the twenty-third verse, to be fully satisfied that, put what inter-
pretation you may upon the words spoken at Csesarea-Philippi to St.
Feter, they conveyed to him no power or privilege beyond that which
Jesus conferred upon the entire college of the apostles, and in its col-
lective capacity upon the church.*
xv.
The Rebuke of St. Peter. 1
Jesus had tested the faith of the apostles. Their reply to his
pointed interrogation, "But whom say ye that I am?" was so far sat-
isfactory. They had not been influenced either by the hostility of the
Pharisees, or the low and unworthy imaginations of the people. They
were ready to acknowledge the Messiahship of their Master, such as
they understood it to be, and had risen even to some dim conception
of his divinity. They were all ready to adopt the declaration of their
spokesman as the expression of their faith, "Thou art the Christ, the
Son of the living God."
But in this faith of theirs there was one great and fatal defect.
Neither they, nor any of their countrymen of that age, had asso-
ciated with the advent of their Messiah any idea of humiliation,
rejection, suffering unto death. Obscure he might be in his first
appearances, and difficult of recognition ; obstacles of various kinds
might be thrown in his path, over which he might have laboriously
to climb ; but sooner or later the discovery of who and what he was
would burst upon the people, and by general acclaim he would be
exalted to his destined lordship over Israel. One, coming unto his
own, and by his own received not ; asking not, and getting not, any
honor from men ; walking in lowliness all his days ; a man of many
and deeply-hidden griefs, misunderstood by the great mass of the
people, despised and rejected by their rulers, taken at last to be
judged and condemned as a deceiver of the people, a vilifier of Moses,
a blasphemer against God; crucified at last as a malefactor—it hud
• See "The Forty Days after our Lord's Resurrection, " pp. 807-810.
t Matt. 16 : 21-28 ; Mark 8 : 31-38 ; 9 : 1 ; Luke 9 : 22-27.
THE REBUKE OF ST. PETER. 321
never entered into their thoughts that such a one could be their Mes-
siah. He might suffer somewhat, perhaps, at the hands of his own
and Israel's enemies; possibly he might have to submit to death, the
common lot of all men ; but that he should suffer at the hands of the
very people over whom he came to reign, and that by their hands he
should be put to death — no throne erected, and no kingdom won —
this was not only alien from, it was utterly contradictory to, their
conceptions and their belief. Yet all this was true ; and from their
earlier and false ideas the disciples had to be weaned. Jesus did
this gradually. At first, during all his previous converse with them
while engaged in his public labors in Judea and Galilee, he had care-
fully abstained from saying any thing about his approaching suffer-
ings and death. Not that these were either unforeseen or forgotten
by him. When alone in the midnight interview with Nicodemus, he
could speak plainly of his being lifted up upon the cross as the bra-
zen serpent had been upon the pole in the wilderness, that whosoever
looked upon him believingly might be saved. To the people of Judea
and Galilee he could drop hints, which, however obscure to his hear-
ers, tell us of a full knowledge and foresight on his part of all that
awaited him. He could point to his body as to the temple, which,
though destroyed, in three days he should raise up again. He could
tell his Galilean audience the sign that was to be given to that gen-
eration ; that as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's
belly, the Son of man should be three days and three nights in the
heart of the earth. But never till now, in any of his private conver-
sations with his disciples, had he alluded to this topic. He had
allowed them to take the natural and full impression which his teach-
ing and miracle-working, and the whole tenor of his life and conver-
sation, were fitted to make upon open, honest, devout-minded men.
Their knowledge of him, their faith in him, he had left to grow, till
now, as represented in the confession of St. Peter, it seemed strong
enough to bear some pressure. They might now be told what it had
been out of time to tell them earlier. And if they were to be told at
all beforehand of the dark and tragic close, it would seem to be the
very best and most fitting occasion to begin, at least, to make the
disclosure to them now, when our Lord himself, ceasing from his
public ministry, had sought these few days' quiet in the neighbor-
hood of CaBsarea-Philippi, that his own thoughts might be turned to
all that awaited him when he went up to Jerusalem. " From that
time forth began Jesus to show unto his disciples how he must go unto
Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and
scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day." A few
Life «f ChrUt 21
322 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
days after this, as they descended irora the Mount of Transfigura-
tion, Jesus charged Peter and James and John, saying, " Tell the
Tision to no man till the Son of man be risen from the dead." A few
days later, while they were still in Galilee, passing through it so pri-
vately that it evidenced a desire that no man should know it, (Mark
9 : 30,) Jesus said to his disciples, " Let these sayings sink down into
your hearts, for the Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of
men, and they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised
again." After the raising of Lazarus there was a brief retreat to
Peraaa, till the time of the last Passover drew on. There was some-
thing very peculiar in the whole manner and bearing of our Lord
when, leaving this retreat, he set forth on his final journey to Jeru-
salem. He stepped forth before his disciples, "and they were ama-
zed, and as they followed they were afraid." It was while they were
on the way thus going up to Jerusalem, that he took the twelve apart,
and said to them, " Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things
that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be
accomplished ; for he shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and
unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death, and shall
deliver him to the Gentiles, and they shall mock, and shall scourge,
and shall spit upon, and shall crucify him, and the third day he shall
rise again." Matt. 20 : 17-19 ; Mark 10 : 32-34 ; Luke 18 : 31-34. It
thus appears that four times at least before the event — thrice in Gal-
ilee and once in Peraea — Jesus foretold with growing minuteness of
detail his passion and death ; specifying the place — Jerusalem ; the
time — the approaching Passover; the agents — the chief priests,
scribes, and Gentiles ; the course of procedure — his betrayal into the
hands of the Jewish authorities, his delivery by them into the hands
of the Gentiles ; the manner of his death — crucifixion under a judi-
cial sentence ; some of the accompanying circumstances — the scourg-
ing, the mocking, the spitting. Any one placed in the position of
Jesus — seeing the rising tide of bitter enmity, and knowing the goal
at which it aimed — might have conjectured that nothing short of the
death of their victim would appease the wrath of his enemies. But
what mere human foresight could have foretold, at Caasarea-Philippi,
that Herod would not anticipate the sacerdotal party, and seize upon
Jesus on his way through Galilee, and crown the Baptist's murder
by that of his successor ? What mere human foresight could have
foretold that after so many previous attempts and failures, the one at
the next Passover season would succeed ; that Jesus would not per-
ish, as Stephen did, in a tumultuous outbreak ; that all the formali-
ties of a trial and condemnation would be gone through, and death
■a-
ba
THE REBUKE OF ST. PETER. 323
by crucifixion be the result ? Nor will it help to furnish us with any
natural explanation of these foretellings of his sufferings and death
by Jesus, to say that he gathered them from the prophecies of the
Old Testament, with which we know him to have been familiar, and
to which, indeed, even in these foretellings, he pointed ; for, much as
'Jiose prophecies did convey, they fell far short of that particularity
which characterizes the sayings of our Lord. Receiving the account
of the evangelists as genuine and true, we are shut up to the conclu-
sion that in regard to his passion and death Jesus manifested before-
hand a foreknowledge proper only to him who knows all ends from
their beginnings ; and that still more was this the case as to his res-
urrection, which he predicted still oftener, and could not have pre-
dicted in plainer or less ambiguous terms.
It may for a moment appear strange that the disciples were so
taken by surprise when the death and the resurrection of their Mas-
ter actually took place. How could this be, we are apt to ask our-
selves, after such distinct and unambiguous declarations as those
which we have quoted? Let us remember, however, that the same
authority which instructs us that these predictions were uttered,
informs us that they were not understood by those to whom they were
in the first instance addressed. "They understood not the saying,
and it was hid from them, and they feared to ask him." Luke 9 : 45,
"And they kept that saying with themselves, questioning one with
another what the rising from the dead should mean." Mark. 9:10.
The words of Jesus were hi themselves easy enough to understand;
but was it figuratively or literally they were to be taken? We can
scarcely judge aright of the perplexity into which so unexpected an
announcement must have thrown the disciples at this stage of their
acquaintance with Christ, nor understand how natural it was that
they should explain them away. We so often see them, with other
and less difficult subjects, taking what he meant literally as if it were
figuratively spoken, and what he meant figuratively as if it were to be
literally understood — that it takes the edge off our wonder that in
this instance the disciples should have hesitated how to take the
words that they had heard. The expression, "rising from the dead,"
the one that appears to have perplexed them the most, appears to
us one of the simplest. Yet, when we put ourselves exactly in their
position, we begin to see that they had more ground for their per-
plexity than is at first apparent. A raising from the dead was what
they had themselves witnessed. In the general resurrection of the
dead they believed. There was nothing, therefore, creating any diffi-
culty in the way of their understanding the mere literal signification
324 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
of the phrase — rising from the dead. But the resurrection of Jesus-
what could it mean? It could not be his sharing in the general res-
urrection of all the dead that he was speaking of. But was he to die
and to rise and to remain risen? or to die and to rise and to die
again? He could raise others from the dead, but if he were to diej
who was to raise him? Need we be surprised if, with their notions
of who and what their Messiah was to be, the disciples should at times
have believed that it was of some spiritual death and resurrection —
some sinking into the grave and rising again of his cause and king-
dom — that Jesus spoke?
At first, indeed, and before any time for reflecting upon it is
given, St. Peter seizes upon the natural meaning of the words that he
had heard, and interprets them generally as predicting suffering and
death to his Master, and, offended at the very thought of a future
so different from the one that they all had anticipated, in the heat of
his surprise and indignation, buoyed up, no doubt, by the praise that
had just been bestowed upon him, he forgets himself so far as actually
to lay hold by arm or garment of our Lord, and in the spirit of a
patron, or protector, he begins to rebuke him, saying, " Be it far from
thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee." Kindliness in the act and
speech; a strong interest in Christ's mere personal welfare — but igno-
rance and presumption too ; forgetfulness of the distance that sepa-
rated him from Jesus, and a profound insensibility to the higher
spiritual designs which the sufferings and death of Jesus were to be
the means of accomphshing. Now let us mark the manner in which
this interference is regarded and treated by Christ, He turns about,
he looses himself from the too familiar hold, he looks on his disciples
as if craving their special notice of what he was about to say and do,
and by that look having engaged their fixed regard, he says to Peter,
"Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence to me." What was
the secret of the quickness, the sharpness, the stern severity of this
rebuke? Why was it that, for the moment, the apostle disappeared
as it were from the Saviour's view, and Satan, the arch- tempter, took
his place? Why was it that the very word which our Lord had
applied to Satan in the last and greatest of the temptations of the
wilderness, is here used again, as if the great tempter had reappeared
and renewed his solicitation? It was because he found the feet of
Peter had actually stepped upon the very ground that Satan, m his
great temptation of our Saviour had occupied. Take all the king-
doms of the world — such had been the bribe held out — take them
now — save thyself all the toil, the agony — let the cup pass froin thee,
step into tne tnrone without touching or tasting the bitterness of the
.
THE REBUKE OF ST. PETER. 326
cross Promptly, indignantly, was this temptation repelled in the
wilderness; and when it reappears in the language of his apostle,
"Be it far from thee: this shall not be unto thee" — when once again
he is tempted to shrink from the sufferings and the death in store for
hLn — as promptly and as indignantly is it again repelled, Peter being
regarded as personating Satan in making it, and addressed even as
the great tempter had been.
What a difference between the two sayings, uttered within a few
minutes of each other! "Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh
and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in
heaven." "Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence" — or,
as the word means, thou art a stumbling-stone, a rock of offence —
"unto me." Can it be the same man to whom words of such different
import are addressed ? Yes, the same man in two quickly succeed-
ing states. Now (to the eye which seeth in secret) he appears as one
whose mind the Father hath enlightened, now as one whose heart
Satan has filled and occupied ; now the object of praise and blessing,
now of censure and pungent rebuke. And does not this changing
Peter, with those two opposite sides of his character turned so rapidly
to Christ, stand a type and emblem of our weak humanity? of the
ductile nature that is in the best of the followers of our Lord ? of the
quick transitions that so often take place within us ? our souls now
&hone upon by the light from heaven, now lit up with fires of another
kindling ? What lessons of humility and charity do such experiences
in the history of the best of men inculcate !
Peter must have been greatly surprised when, shaken off by Jesus,
he was spoken to as if he were the arch-fiend himself. Unconscious
of any thing but kindly feelings to his Master, he would be at a loss
at first to know what sinful, Satanic element there had been in the
sentiments he had been cherishing — the words that he had used. It
might at once occur to him that he had been too familiar — had used
too much liberty with him whom he had just acknowledged to be the
Christ, the Son of the living God. But it surely could not be simply
and solely because of his being offended at the freedom taken, that
Jesus had spoken to him as he did. Some light may have been
thrown upon the matter, even to Peter's apprehension at the time, by
our Lord's own explanatory words : " Get thee behind me, Satan : for
thou savorest not the things that be of God, but the things that be
of men." There are two ways of looking upon those sufferings and
death, of which, now for the first time, Jesus had begun to speak —
the selfish, earthly, human one, and the spiritual, the divine. Peter
was thinking of them solely under the one aspect, thinking of them
326 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
in their bearing alone upon the personal comfort, the outward estate
and condition of his Lord. He would have Jesus avoid them. He
himself would stand between them and his Master, and not suffer
them to come upon him ; inflicting, as he imagined they would do,
such great discredit and dishonor upon his name and cause. But
he knew not, or forgot, that it was for this end that Jesus came into
the world, to suffer and die for sinners ; that the cup could not pass
from him, the cross could not be avoided, without prophecies being
left unfulfilled, purposes of God left unaccomplished, the sin of man
left unatoned for, the salvation of mankind left unsecured. He knew
not, or forgot, that he was bringing to bear upon the humanity of our
Lord one of the strongest and subtlest of all the trials to which it was
to be exposed, when in prospect of that untold weight of sorrow
which was to be laid upon it in the garden and upon the cross, the
instincts of nature taught it to shrink therefrom, to desire and to pray
for exemption. It was the quick and tender sense our Lord had of
the peculiarity and force of this temptation, rather than his sense of
the singularity and depth of Peter's sinfulness, which prompted and
pointed his reproof. At the same time he desired to let Peter know
that the way of looking at things, in which he had been indulging,
had in it that earthly, carnal element which condemned it in his sight.
Nay, more; he would seize upon the opportunity now presented, to
proclaim once more, as he had so often done, that not in his own case
alone, but in the case of all his true and faithful followers, suffering,
self-denial, self-sacrifice, must be undergone. He had noticed the
approach of a number of the people who had assembled at the sight
of Jesus and his apostles passing by their dwellings. These he called
to him, (Mark 8 : 34,) as if wishing to intimate that what he had now
to say, though springing out of what had occurred, and addressed in
the first instance to the twelve, was yet meant for all — was to be taken
up and repeated, and spread abroad, as addressed to the wide world
of mankind. 'If any man,' he said, 'whosoever, whatsoever he be,
will come after me, be a follower of me, not nominally, but really, let
him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. No
other way there was for me, your Redeemer, your forerunner, than by
taking up the cross appointed, amd on that cross bearing your trans-
gressions; and no other way for you to follow me, than by ea^h of
you voluntarily and daily taking up that cross which consists in the
repudiation of self-indulgence as the principle and spirit of your life,
in the willing acceptance of self-denial as the fixed condition f the
new life's growth and progress in your souls, in the crucifying of
every sinful affection and desire. " For whosoever will save his life
THE EEBUKE OF ST. PETER. 327
shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the
gospel's, shall save it." Let it be your main, supreme, engrossing
object, to save your life ; to guard yourself against its ills, to secure
its benefits, its wealth, its honors, its enjoyments — the end shall be
that the very thing you seek to save you certainly shall lose. But if
fron: a supreme love to Christ, and a predominating desire to please
him, you are willing to lose life, to give up anything which he calls
you to give up, the end shall be that the very thing that you were
ready to lose, you shall at last and most fully gain. For take it even
as a mere master of profit and loss — but weigh aright what is thrown
into the scale, when you are balancing earthly and eternal interests —
" What is a man profited if he gain the whole world ?" ' No man ever
did so ; but suppose he did, imagine that one way or other the very
whole, the sum-total that this world — its pursuits, its possessions, its
enjoyments, can do to make one happy — were grasped by one single
pair of arms into one single bosom, would it profit him, would he be
a gainer if, when the great balance was struck, it should be found —
that in gaming the whole world he had lost his own soul ? that it had
been lost to God and to all its higher duties, and so lost to happiness
and lost for ever ? For if a man once lose his soul, where shall he
find an equivalent in value for it ? where shall he find that by which
it can be redeemed or bought again ; what shall he find or give in
exchange for his soul? Too true, alas, it is, that, clear though this
simplest of all questions of profit and loss be, many will not work it
out, or apply it to their own case, content to grasp what is nearest,
the present, the sensible, the earthly, and to overlook the more
remote, the unseen, the spiritual, the eternal. Too true that what
hinders many from a hearty and full embrace of Christ and all the
blessings of his salvation, is a desire to go with the multitude; a
shrinking, through shame, from any thing that would separate them
from the world. Would that upon the ears of such the solemn words
of our Lord might fall with power : " Whosoever shall be ashamed of
me, and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when
he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy
angels." Luke 9 : 26. And at that coming, when the earth and the
heavens shall pass away, and we shall find ourselves standing before
the great white throne, and in the presence of that vast community
of holy beings, how will it look then to ha^e been ashamed of
lesus now? What will it be then to find him ashamed of us, dis-
owning us?
How strangely must this about the Son of man so coming with
power and great glory, have sounded in the ears of those who had
328 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
just been listening to him as lie told how that he must suffer manj
things, and be killed, and be raised again the third day. Beyond
that time of dishonor and suffering and death, predicted as so near,
here was another advent of the Son of man, around which every cir-
cumstance of glory and honor was to be thrown. But when was that
advent to be realized? Of the day and the hour of its coming no
man was to know ; but this much about it Jesus might even now
reveal, that there were some standing then before him who should
not taste of death till they saw the kingdom of God set up, till they
saw Jesus coming in his kingdom. It could not be of his personal
and final advent to judgment that Jesus meant here to speak, for
that was not to occur within the lifetime of any of that generation.
Those, besides, who were to be alive and to be witnesses of that
advent were never to taste of death. Jesus could only mean to speak
of such a visible institution of his kingdom as should carry with it 'a
prelude and prophecy of the great consummation. As it is now
known that of the twelve apostles John and Philip alone survived the
great catastrophe of the destruction of Jerusalem, when the Judaic
economy which Christ's kingdom was meant to supersede was set
aside, it has been generally believed that it was to that particular
epoch or event that Jesus here referred. If we reflect, however, that
it was to the general audience by whom he was at the time surround-
ed, and not exclusively to the twelve, that Jesus addressed these
words, we may be the more disposed to believe that it was to the
general fact of the open establishment of his kingdom upon earth —
that kingdom which was erected on the day of Pentecost, and which
came forth more conspicuously into notice when the Jewish ceremo-
nial expired, and it took its pl&,ce — that our Saviour alluded. Some
of those to whom Jesus was speaking at Caesarea-Philippi were to
witness the setting up of this kingdom within the souls of men, and in
this setting up were to behold the visible pledge that he would come
again the second time, to bring the present economy of things to its
close.
Let us apply the saying of our Lord in this way to ourselves.
He has a kingdom, not distinguished now by any tokens of external
splendor — his kingdom within the soul. Before we taste of death we
may, we ought, to know that kingdom, to enter into it, be enrolled as
its subjects, be partakers of its privileges and blessings. And if so
by faith we see and own our Lord, yielding ourselves up to him as
the Christ, the Son of the living God, who has come in the name of
the Lord to save us. then when we close our eyes in death, we may do so
in the humble confidence that when he comes in his own glory, and
THE TEANSFIGUBATION. 329
Hit glory of the Father, and the glory of the holy angels, we shall
not be ashamed before him at his coming, and he will not be ashamed
of us, but will welcome us into that kingdom which shall never be
moved, whose glory and whose blessedness shall be full, unchange-
able, eternal.
XVI.
The Transfiguration-.*
Six days elapsed after our Lord's first foretelling of his approach-
ing death. These days were spent in the region of Csesarea-Plrilippi
and appear to have passed without the occurrence of any noticeable
event : days, however, they undoubtedly would be of great perplexity
and sadness to the disciples. They had so far modified their first
beliefs and expectations, that they were ready to cleave to their
Master in the midst of prevalent misconception and enmity. But
this new and strange announcement that he must go up to Jerusalem,
not only to be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, but
to be put to death and raised again the third day, has disturbed their
faith, and filled their hearts with sorrowful anxieties — a disturbance
and anxiety chiefly, we may believe, experienced by those three of the
twelve already admitted by Jesus to more intimate fellowship and
confidence. The six days over, bringing no relief, Jesus takes these
three "up into a high mountain apart."
Standing upon the height which overlooks Csesarea-Philippi, 1
looked around upon the towering ridges which Great Hermon, the
Sheikh of the Mountains, as the Arabs call it, projects into the plain.
Full of the thought that one of these summits on which I gazed ha«J
in all probability witnessed the transfiguration, I had fixed upon one
of them which, from its peculiar position, form, and elevation might
aptly be spoken of as a " high mountain apart," when casting my eye
casually down along its sides as they sloped into the valley, the
remains of three ancient villages appeared dotting the base. I
remembered how instantly on the descent from the mountain Jesus
had found himself in the midst of his disciples and of the multitude,
and was pleased at observing that the mountain-top I had fixed upon
"01/ )t all the requirements of the gospel narrative. If that were indeed
ihe mountain-top up to which Jesus went, he never stood so high
above the level of the familiar lake, nor did his eye ever sweep so
• Matt. 17 : 1-13 ; Mark 9: 2-13 ; Luke 9 : 28-36.
330 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
broadly the hills of Galilee. Whichever the mountain was, the shades
of evening were falling as Jesus climbed its sides. He loved, we
know, the stillness of the night, the solitude of the mountain. He
sought them for the purposes of devotion — in the loneliness, the
calmness, the elevation, finding something in harmony with prayer.
Generally, however, on such occasions he was alone. He either sent
his disciples away or separated himself from their society. Now,
however, as anticipating what was about to happen, he takes with
him Peter and James and John, the destined witnesses of his humil-
iation and agony in the garden. The sun sinks in the west beneath
the waters of the Great Sea as the top of the mountain is reached.
Night begins to draw its mantle round them, wrapping in obscurity
the world below. Jesus begins to pray. The three, who rest a little
space away from him, would join in his devotions, but wearied with
the ascent, less capable of resisting the coming-on of night and the
pressure of fatigue, their eyes grow heavy till they close in sleep —
the last sight they rest on, that sombre figure of their Master; the
last sound on their listening ear, the gentle murmur of his ascending
prayers. From this sleep they waken, not at the gentle touch of the
morning light, not to look down upon the plain below, seen under the
beams of the rising day — with stroke of awakening power, a bright,
effulgent radiance has fallen upon their eyelids, and as they lift them
up, while all is dark below, the mountain-top is crowned with light,
and there before them now there are three forms: their Master —
"the fashion of his countenance altered" — his face shining as the
sun — lit up, not alone, as the face of Moses once was, by the linger-
ing reflection of the outward glory upon which it had gazed, but illu-
mined from within, as if the hidden glory were bursting through the
fleshy veil and kindling it into radiance as it passed — his raiment shi-
ning, bright as the glistening snow that lay far above them upon the
highest top of Hermon — exceeding white, so as no fuller on earth
could whiten them ; and beside him, appearing too in glory, yet in
glory not like his — dimmer and less radiant — their forms, their atti-
tudes, their words all showing that they came to wait on him and
do him homage — Moses the lawgiver, and Elijah the reformer and
restorer of the Jewish theocracy. Whence came they? In what
form did they now appear? How came Peter and James and John
at once to recognize them ? They came from the world of the dead,
the region that departed spirits occupy. Elijah did not need to bor-
row for this occasion his old human form. He had carried that with
hiin in the chariot of fire — the corruptible then changed into the
incorruptible — the mortal having then put on immortality ; and now
THE TRANSFIGURATION. 331
in that transfigured body he stands beside the transfigured form of
Jesus. Moses had died, indeed, and was once buried ; but no man
knew where nor how, nor can any man tell us in what bodily or mate-
rial shape it was that he now appeared, nor what there was, if any
thing, about the external appearance either of him or of Elijah, whit k
helped the apostles to the recognition. In some way unknown, the
recognition came. It was given them to know who these two shining
strangers were. It was given them to listen to, and so far to under-
stand, the converse they were holding with Jesus, as to know that
they were speaking to him about the decease he was to accomplish
at Jerusalem. But it was not given to them either immediately or
any time thereafter to report, perhaps even to remember, the words
they heard. We must remain content with knowing nothing more
about that conversation — which, whether we think of the occasion or
the speaker or the subject-matter, appears to us as the sublimest
ever held on earth — than generally what its topic was. But of what
great moment even that information is we shall presently have to
speak. Their mysterious discourse with Jesus over, Moses and Elias
make a movement to retire. Peter will not let them go — will detain
them if he can. He might not have broken in upon his Master while
engaged in converse with them ; but now that they seem about to
withdraw, in the fulness of his ecstatic delight, with a strong wish to
detain the strangers, a dim sense that they were in an exposed and
shelterless place, and a very vain imagination that the affording of
some better protection might perhaps induce them to stay, and that
if they did, they might all take up their permanent dwelling here
together, he cannot but exclaim, " Master, it is good for us to be
here: and let us make three tabernacles;" (three arbors or forest-
tents* of the boughs of the neighboring trees;) "one for thee, and
one for Moses, and one for Elias." Not knowing what he said, the
words are just passing from his babbling lips, when the eye that fol-
lows the retreating figures is filled with another and a brighter light.
A cloud comes down upon the mountain-top — a cloud of brightness —
a cloud which, unfolding its hidden treasures, pours a radiance down
upon the scene that throws even the form of the Redeemer into
shadow, and in the darkness of whose excessive light the forms of
Moses and Elias sink away and disappear. This cloud is no other
than the Shekinah, the symbol of Jehovah's gracious presence
From the midst of its excellent glory there comes the voice, "Thn
is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him !" — not
Moses, nor Elias, nor any other lawgiver, nor any other prophet — but
"hear ye him." As the apostJes hear that voice, they are sore afraid ;
332 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
the strength goes out of them, and they fall with their faces to the
ground. Jesus conies, touches them. The touch restores their
strength. He says, "Arise, and be not afraid." They spring up;
they look around. The voices hava ceased, the forms have van-
ished, the glory is gone; they are alone with Jesus as at the first.
Such as we have now recited them were the incidents of the
transfiguration. Let us consider now its scope and design. In the
shaded history of the Man of sorrows, this one passage stands out
so unique — a single outburst of light and glory on the long track of
darkness — that we look at it with the most intense curiosity ; and as
we look, the questions start to our lips, Why was it that for that one
brief season the brow that was to be crowned with thorns was
crowned with glory, the countenance that was to be marred and spit
upon shone as the sun, the raiment that was to be stripped off and
divided among foreign soldiers became so bright and glistering?
Why was it that he who ere long was to be seen hanging up to die
between the two malefactors, was now and thus to be seen, with
Moses and Elias standing by his side paying to him the most pro-
found obeisance ? W 7 hy did that clouded glory come down and glide
across the mountain-top, and that voice of the Infinite Majesty speak
forth its awful and authoritative, yet instructive and encouraging
words ? In answer to these questions, we must say that we know
too little of the world of spirits to take it upon us to affirm or con-
jecture what it was, so far as they personally were concerned, or the
community of which they formed a part, which biiouglit Moses and
Elias from their places of abode in the invisible world to stand and
talk for this short season with Jesus on the mount. Doubtless ~the
benefit, as the honor, to them was singular and great, involving a
closer approach to, a nearer fellowship with Jesus in his glorified
state, than was ever made or enjoyed by any other of our race on
ut was it of those bitter waters of contention, envy, and all unchari-
tableness, which the centuries since Christ's time have seen flooding
the church — its members struggling for such honors and emoluments,
or, when these were but scanty, for such authority and influence as
ecclesiastical offices and positions could confer ! Slow, indeed, has
that society which bears his name been in learning the lesson which,
first in precept, and then in his own exalted example, the Saviour left
behind him, that " whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased, and
he that humbleth himself shall be exalted."
We have had before us the first of the two instances in which John
was led away by a fiery and intemperate zeal — in this instance to
misjudge and condemn one who, though he had not faith nor forti-
tude enough to leave all and follow Jesus, yet had faith enough to
enable him to work miracles in Christ's name. It is not told us how
John took the check which Jesus laid upon that spirit of officialism
and fanaticism which had been working in his breast. But we do
know how thoroughly that spirit was at last subdued in the heart of
the meekest and most loving of the twelve, and how he moved
afterward among his fellow-men with step of Christ-like gentleness,
and became the " guardian spirit of the little ones of the kingdom."
M
III.
Christ and his Brethren.*
We like to follow those who by their sayings and doings have
filled and dazzled the public eye, into the seclusion of their homes.
We like to see such men in their undress, when, all restraint removed,
their peculiarities of character are free to exhibit themselves in the
countless artless ways and manners of daily domestic life. It brings
them so much nearer to us, gives us a closer hold of them, makes us
feel more vividly their kinship to us, to know hew they did the things
that we have all every day to do, how they comported themselves hi
the circumstances in which we all every day are placed. Great pains
have been taken by biographers of distinguished men to gratify this
* John 7 : 1-9.
358 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
desire. Quite apart, indeed, from any object of this kind, we could
scarcely sit down to write out an account of what we saw and heard
in the course of two or three years' close intercourse with a Mend,
without dropping many a hint as to the minor modes and habits of
his life.
Is there nothing remarkable in the entire absence of any thing of
thi3 kind in the narrative of the four evangelists ? Engrossed with
what they tell us, we think not of what they have left untold ; think
not, for example, that they have left no materials for gratifying the
desire that we have spoken of — one so natural and so strong. It is
as if, in writing these narratives, a strong bias of our nature had been
put under restraint. They say not a word about the personal appear-
ance of their Master ; there is nothing for the painter or sculptor to
seize on. They give us no details of his private and personal habits,
of any peculiarities of look or speech or gesture, of the times or ways
of his doing this thing or that. St. Mark, the most graphic describer
of the four, tells us once or twice of a particular look or motion of our
Lord, but not so as to indicate any thing distinctive in their manner.
Why this silence ? Why thus withhold from us all means of forming
a vivid conception of the Redeemer's personal appearance, and of
following him through the details of his more familiar daily inter-
course with the twelve ? Was it that the materials were wanting,
that there were no personal peculiarities about Jesus Christ, that
inwardly and outwardly all was so nicely balanced, all was in such
perfect harmony and proportion, that as in his human intellect and
human character there was nothing to distinguish him individually
from his fellow-men — nothing, I mean, of that kind by which all the
individual intellects and characters are each specially characterized —
so even in the minor habits of his life there was nothing distinctive to
be recorded ? Or was it that the veil has been purposely drawn over
all such materials, to check all that superstitious worship of the
senses which might have gathered round minute pictures of our Lord
in the acts and habits of his daily life ? If even as it is, the passion
for such worship has made the food for itself to feed upon, and, living
upon that food, has swelled out into such large proportions, what
would it havej been if such food had from the first been provided ?
Is it not well that the image of our Lord in his earthly life, while
having the print of our humanity so clearly and fully impressed upon
it, should yet be lifted up and kept apart, and all done that could be
done to keep it from being sullied by such rude, familiar, irreverent
regard ?
What is true of our Lord's habits generally, is true of his reJi-
CHRIST AND HIS BRETHREN. 359
gious habits — of the time and manner in which religious duties were
performed. We know something of the manner in which these duties
were discharged by a truly devout Jew of Christ's age, of the daily
washings before meals, and the frequent fastings, and the repeated
and long prayers, of the attendance at the synagogue, and the regu-
lar going up to the great feasts at Jerusalem. Some of these Jesus
appears to have neglected. The scribes and the Pharisees came to
him, saying, " Why do thy disciples trangress the tradition of the
elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread." Matt.
15 : 2. Again they came to him with another similar complaint,
"Why do the disciples of John fast often and make prayers, and
likewise the disciples of the Pharisees, but thine eat and drink?"
These charges are brought nominally against the disciples, who only
followed the example of their Master. He neglected the ordinary
ablutions to which in Jewish eyes a sacred character attached. He
himself did not fast, and he taught his disciples that when they did
so it was to be in such a manner that men might not know that they
were fasting. Of the times and the manner in which our Lord's
private devotions were conducted, how little is revealed ! You read
of his rising up a great while before day, and retiring into a solitary
place to pray. Mark 1 : 35. You read of his sending the multitude
away, and going up into a mountain to pray ; of his continuing all
night in prayer. Matt. 14 : 23 ; Luke 6 : 12. You read of special acts
of devotion connected with his baptism, his transfiguration, his agony
in the garden, his suffering on the cross. We know that it was by
him, and him alone, of all the children of men, that the precept " pray
without ceasing," was fully and perfectly kept — kept by its being in
the spirit of prayer that his whole life was spent — but when we ask what
Christ's daily habit was, how often each day did he engage in specific
acts of devotion, and how, when he did so, were these acts performed,
did he retire each morning and evening from his disciples to engage in
prayer, did he daily, morning and evening, pray with and for his disci-
ples, the evangelists leave us without an answer. The single thing they
tell us, and it conveys but little precise information, is, that " it came
to pass that, as he was praying in a certain place, when he ceased,
one of his disciples said unto him, Lord, teach us to pray, as John
also taught his disciples." Luke 11 : 1. This took place during the
last six months of our Lord's ministry. It looks as if the disciples
had come upon their Master when engaged in his solitary devotions,
and had been so struck with what they saw and heard, that one of
them, when the prayer was over, could not help asking him to teach
them to pray. Remembering that this happened at so late a period
360 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
m tlieir intercourse with him, does it not seem as if Jesus had not
been in the habit of daily leading their devotions ? The very diffi-
culty that we feel in understanding how at such a time such a ques-
tion came to be put to him, shows us what a blank there is here in
the evangelic narrative, and how ignorant we mast be content to
remain.
If the generally accepted chronology of our Lord's life be the true
one, and we see no reason to reject it, we are not left in such ignorance
as to how another of the religious duties practised at the time by those
around him was discharged by Christ. His ministry in Galilee lasted
eighteen months. During this period, four of the great annual reli-
gious festivals at which the Jews were enjoined to attend had taken
place at Jerusalem — two pentecosts, one passover, and one feast of
tabernacles — at none of which Jesus appeared. There was indeed
a reason for his absence, grounded on the state of feeling against
him existing in Jerusalem, and the resolution already taken by the
Jewislr leaders there to cut him off by death. Till his work in Galilee
was completed he would not place himself in the circumstances which
would inevitably lead on to that doom being executed. But who of
all around him knew of that or any other good or sufficient reason
for his absenting himself from these sacred festivals ? And to them
what a perplexing fact must that absence have appeared! Alto-
gether, when you take the entire attitude, bearing, and conduct of
Jesus Christ as to their ablutions, their fastings, their prayers, their
keeping of the Sabbath, their attendance at the feasts, it is not diffi-
cult to imagine what an inexplicable mystery he must have been to
the great majority of his countrymen. I do not speak now of the
scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, of whom his teaching and his life
was one continued rebuke, and who hated him with a deadly hatred
from the first, but of the many sincerely devout, superstitiously reli-
gious Jews among whom he lived. What a perfect puzzle to such
the character and career of this man Christ Jesus — one speaking so
much and in such a way of God and of godliness, proclaiming the
advent of God's own kingdom on the earth, unfolding its duties, its
privileges, its blessednesses, yet to them seeming so neglectful, so unde-
vout, so irreligious ! We may not be able now thoroughly to put our-
selves in these men's position — thoroughly to understand with what
kind of eyes it was that they looked upon that wonderful spectacle
which the life of Jesus pressed upon their vision — but we should be
capable of discerning the singular and emphatic protest which that
life was ever raising against all mere formal piety, the piety of times
and seasons and ordinances, the religion of rule and of routine.
CHRIST AND IIIS BRETHREN. 361
But let us now rejoin our Lord. He is once more at Capernaum,
01 in its neighborhood. A year and a half has elapsed since he joined
the bands in company with whom he had gone up to Jerusalem to
keep the second passover after his baptism. It is autumn, and all
around are busy in preparing for their journey to the capital to cele-
brate the feast of tabernacles. But he exhibits no intention to
accompany them. He is going apparently to treat this festival as
he had done the four which preceded it. What others thought of
his behavior in this respect we are left to conjecture. His brethren,
however — those who were either his actual brothers or his cousins,
the members of that household in which he had been brought up —
could not let the opportunity pass without telling him what they
thought of his cod duct. He and they had latterly been separated.
They did not believe in him. They did not rank themselves among
his disciples. Yet uninterested spectators of what had been going
on in Galilee they could not remain. Now that Joseph was dead, he
was the head of their family, and they could not but feel that their
position and prospects were in some way linked with his. Somewhat
proud they could not but be that he had excited such great attention,
done such wonderful works, drawn after him such vast crowds. At
first, with all their incredulity, they were half inclined to hope that
some great future was in store for him. One who spake so highly
and with such authority as he did, who claimed and exercised such
power, what might he not be and do in a community so peculiarly
placed, so singularly excitable as the Jewish one then was? He
might even prove to be the Messiah, the great princely leader of the
people, for whom so many were waiting. Against that was the whole
style and character of his teaching — in which, instead of there being
any thing addressed to the social or political condition of the people,
any thing fitted to stir up the spirit of Jewish pride and indepen-
dence, there was every thing calculated to soothe and subdue — to
lead the thoughts and hopes of the people in quite other than earthly
channels. Against it, too, there was the fact, becoming more appa-
rent as the months ran on, that the natural leaders of the community,
the scribes and Pharisees, by and through whom only it could be that
any great civil emancipation could be effected, were uniting against
him in a bond of firmer and fiercer hostility. Even the crowds of
the common people, which had at first surrounded him, were latterly
\eclining, offended at the way in which he was beginning to speak of
nimself — telling them that except they ate his flesh and drank his
blood they had no life in them. Emboldened by all this to use the
old familiarity to which in other days they had been accustomed, his
362 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
brethren come to Lira and say, " Depart hence, and go into Judea,
that thy disciples also may see the works that thou doest. For there
is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketk to
be known openly : if thou do these things, show thyself to the world."
Imputing to him the common motives by which all worldly, selfish,
ambitious men are animated, they taunt him with weakness and folly
Who that possessed such powers as he did would be satisfied Avith
turning them to such poor account? If he were what he seemed,
was he to hide himself for ever among the hills of Galilee, and not go
up boldly to the capital, and wrest from the rulers the acknowledg-
ment of his claims ? It was but a pitiful success to draw after him
some thousands of a gaping multitude, who followed him because
they ate of the bread that he furnished and were filled — all whose
faith in him was exhausted in wondering at him as the worker of such
miracles. Let him, if he had the spirit of a true courage in him — if
he was fit to take the leadership of the people — let him aim at once
at far higher game — place himself at once in the centre of influence
at Jerusalem, and show himself to the world. Then if, on that broad
theatre, he made his pretensions good, it would be some honor to claim
connection with him ; some benefit to be enrolled as his followers.
How true is all this to that spirit of a mere earthly prudence and
policy by which the lives of multitudes are regulated ! Christ's own
brothers judge of him by themselves. They cannot conceive but that
he must desire to make the most for his own benefit and aggrandize-
ment of whatever gifts he possessed. They count it to be weak in
him, or worse, that he will not do the most he can in this way and for
this end. They measure all by outward and visible success. And if
success of that kind be not realized, all the chances and opportuni-
ties that are open to him they regard as thrown away and lost. In
speaking thus to Jesus, they sever themselves by a wide interval from
their great relative. He was not of this world. Unselfish, unworldly
were all his motives, aims, and ends. They are of the world, and
true children of the world they are, in thus addressing him, proving
themselves to be. And this they must be told at least, if they will
not effectually be taught. It was in a tone of assumed superiority
that they had spoken to him when they prescribed the course he
should pursue. How far above them does he rise, as from that alti-
tude whose very height hid it from their eyes, he calmly yet solemnly
rolls back on them their rebuke : " My time is not yet come, but your
time is always ready. The world cannot hate you, but me it hateth.
because I testify of it that the works thereof are evil. Go ye up unto
this feast. I go not up yet unto this feast, for my time is not yet full
CHRIST AND HIS BRETHREN. 363
come." They would have him seize upon the opportunity of the
approaching feast to show himself to the world, to win the world's
favor and applause. This was their notion of human life. The stage
upon which men play their parts here was in their eyes but as a
mixed array of changes and chances upon which the keen eye of self
ishness should be always fixed, ready to grasp and make the most oi
them for purposes of personal aggrandizement. For such as they
were, the time was always ready. They had no other reckoning to
make, no other star to steer by, than simply to discern when and how
their selfish interests could be best promoted, and what their hands
thus found to do, to do it with all their might. The world could not
hate them, for they were of the world, and the world loveth its own.
Let them court its favor — let them seek its pleasures, its honors, its
profits — and the world would be pleased with the homage that was
offered it, and if they but succeeded, they might count upon its
applause, for men would praise them when they did well for them-
selves. Psa. 49 : 18. It was not so with Jesus, but utterly and dia-
metrically the reverse. His was no life either of random impulses,
of fitful accident, or of regulated self-seeking. The world he lived in
was to him no antechamber, with doors of aggrandizement here and
there around, for whose opening he was greedily to watch, that he
might go in speedily and seize the prizes that lay beyond before others
grasped them. It was the place into which the Father had sent him
to do there that Father's business, to finish the work there given him
to do. And in the doing of that work there is to be no heat, no hurry,
no impatience with him. The time, the hour for each act and deed,
was already settled in the purposes and ordinances of the Father.
And the Father's time, the Father's hour were his, for which he was
always ready calmly and patiently to wait. The world's hatred he
counted on — he was prepared for. He knew what awaited him at
Jerusalem. He knew what the hatred cherished against him there
would finally and ere long effect ; but he must not prematurely expose
himself to it, nor suffer it to hasten by a single day the great decease
he was to accomplish at Jerusalem. His time was coming — the time
of his manifestation to Israel — of his showing forth to the world — a
very different kind of manifestation from that of which his brethren
were dreaming. But it was not yet fully come, and therefore he did
not mean to go up to Jerusalem and openly to take part from the
beginning as one of its celebrators in this approaching Feast of Tab-
ernacles. This, in ways which we can easily conjecture, but are not
at liberty dogmatically to assert, would have interfered with the
orderly evolution of the great event in which his earthly ministry was
364: THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to close. But the time was fixed — that feast was drawing on — when
his hour would come, and then it would be seen how the Son would
glorify the Father and the Father be glorified in the Son.
And now let us remember that the sharp and vivid contrast drawn
here by our Saviour's own truthful hand — between himself and his
brethren according to the flesh — is the very same that he has
iaught us to draw between all his true disciples and the world. Let
us listen to the description he gave of his own in that sublime inter-
cessory prayer offered up on the eve of his agony, in that upper cham-
ber in which the first communion was celebrated : " They are not of
the world, even as I am not of the world." The Father did not need
to know for whom his Son was then interceding. The Father did not
need to have any description of their character given to him. Yet
twice in that prayer did Jesus say of his true followers thus : " They
are not of the world, even as I am not of the world." To know and
feel and act as he did ; under the deep abiding impression that, low
as our lives are compared with his — small and insignificant as the
ends are that any of us can accomplish — yet that our times, our ways.
our doings are all ordered by heavenly wisdom for heavenly ends
that the tangled threads of our destiny are held by a Father's hand,
to be woven into such patterns as to him seems best ; by the cross of
our Redeemer — by the redemption that was by it wrought out for
as—by the great example of self-sacrifice that was in it exhibited —
by the love of Him who died that we might live, to have the world
crucified unto us, and ourselves crucified to the world ; to have the same
mind in us that was in Him who came not to be ministered unto, but
to minister ; who, though he was so rich, for our sakes became
poor, that we through his poverty might be rich. This would be to
realize the description that our Lord has left behind him of what all
his true disciples ought to be, and in some measure are. As we take
up and apply the test it supplies, how deeply may we all humble our-
selves before him — under the consciousness of how slightly, how par-
tially, if at all, the description is true of us !
CHRIST AT THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES. 365
IV.
Christ at the Feast of Tabernacles.*
Great national benefits, civil, social, and religions, were conferied
upon the Jews by the ordinance that three times each year the whole
adult population of the country should assemble at Jerusalem. The
finest seasons of the year, spring and autumn, were fixed on for these
gatherings of the people. The journeyings at such seasons of friends
and neighbors, in bands of happy fellowship, must have been health-
ful and exhilarating. Separated as it was into clans or tribes, the
frequent reunion of the entire community must have tended to coun-
teract and subdue any jealousies or divisions that might otherwise
have arisen. The meeting together as children of a common progen-
itor, living under the same laws, heirs of the same promises, worship-
pers of the same God, must not only have cultivated the spirit of
brotherhood and nationality, but have strengthened their faith and
guarded from the encroachments of idolatry the worship of the coun-
try. Among the lesser advantages that these periodical assemblages
brought along with them, they afforded admirable opportunities for
the expression and interchange of the sentiments of the people on
every subject that particularly interested them — what in our times
the press and public meetings do, they did for the Jews. So far as
we know, no nation of antiquity had such full and frequent means of
testing and indicating the state of public feeling. Whatever topic
had been engrossing the thoughts of the community would be sure
to be the subject of general conversation in the capital the next time
that the tribes assembled in Jerusalem. Kemembering how fickle
public feeling is, how difficult it is to fix it and keep it concentrated
upon one subject for any considerable period, we may be certain that
it was a subject singularly interesting — one which had taken a gen-
eral and very strong hold of the public mind, that for a year and a
half, during five successive festivals, came up ever fresh upon the lips
of the congregated thousands.
Yet it was so as to the appearance among them of Jesus Christ.
Eighteen months had passed since he had been seen in Jerusalem,
yet no sooner has the Feast of Tabernacles commenced than the
Jews look everywhere around for him, and say, "Where is he? M
The absence of one man among so many thousands might, we should
think, have passed by unnoticed. The absence of this man is thf
* John 7 : 11-52.
8(36 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
subject of general remark. The people generally speak of him with
bated breath, for it is well enough known that he is no favorite with
the great men of the capital; and as they speak, great discord of opin-
ion prevails. It gives us, however, a very good idea of the extent
and strength of the impression he had made upon the entire popula-
tion of the country, that at this great annual gathering, and after so
long an absence, he is instantly the object of search, and so gene-
rally the subject of conversation. Even while they were thus speak-
ing of him he was on his way to Jerusalem. Travelling alone, or but
slenderly escorted, and choosing an unfrequented route, so that no
pre-intimation of his approach might reach the city, he arrives about
the middle of the feast, and throws off at once all attempt at conceal-
ment. Passing, as we might think, from the extreme of caution to the
extreme of daring, he plants himself among the crowd in the temple
courts, and addresses them as one only of the oldest and most learned
of the rabbis might have ventured to do. Some of the rulers are there,
but the suddenness of his appearance, the boldness of the step he
takes, the manner of his speech, make them for the time forget their
purpose. They can't but listen like the rest, but they wont give
heed to the things about the divine kingdom that he is proclaiming.
What strikes them most, and excites their wonder, is that he speaks
go well, quotes the Scriptures, and shows himself so accurately
acquainted with the law. " How knoweth this man letters," they say
of him, "having never learned?" They would turn the thoughts of
the people from what Jesus was saying to the consideration of his
title and qualification to address them. 'Who is this? in what school
was he trained ? at the feet of which of our great rabbis did he sit ?
by what authority does he assume this office ?' Questions very nat-
ural for men full of all the proud and exclusive spirit of officialism to
put ; questions by the very putting of which they would lower him in
the estimation of the multitude, and try to strip his teaching of its
power. They give to Jesus the opportunity of declaring, " My doc-
trine is not mine, but his that sent me." ' I am not addressing you
either as a self-taught man, or one brought up in any of your schools.
I am not addressing to you truths that I was taught by others, or
have myself elaborated. Think not of me, who or what I am ; think
of what I teach, receive it as coming, not from me, but from him who
sent me. You ask about my credentials ; you would like to know
what right I have to become a teacher of the people. There is a far
simpler and better way of coming to a just conclusion about my teach-
ing than the one that you are pointing to, and happily it is one that
lies open unto all. If any man is truly willing to do the Divine will ;
CHEIST AT THE FEAST OF TABEENACLES. 367
if lie wants to know what that will is in order that he inay do it ; if
that, in listening to my teaching, be his simple, earnest aim, he shall
know of the doctrine that I am teaching, whether it be of God, or
whether I speak of myself. No amount of native talent, no extent ol
school learning of any kind, will compensate for the want of a pure
and honest purpose. But if such a purpose be cherished, you shah 1
Bee its end gained ; if your eye be single, your whole body shall be
full of light.' And still the saying of our Lord holds good, that in
the search of truth, in the preserving us from error, in the guiding of
us to right judgments about himself and his doctrine, the heart has
more to do with the matter than the head — the willingness to do
telling upon the capacity to know and to believe. Jesus asks that
he himself be judged by this principle and upon this rule. What, in
teaching was his aim ? Was it to display his talent, to win a repu-
tation, to have his ideas adopted as being his ? — was it to please him-
self, to show forth his own glory ? How boldly does he challenge these
critical observers to detect in him any symptom of self-seeking ! With
what a serene consciousness of the entire absence in himself of that
element from which no other human heart was ever wholly free, does
he say of himself, " He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own
glory : but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true,
and no unrighteousness is in him."
So much is said by Jesus to encourage all truly desirous to
know about him, so much to vindicate himself against the adverse
judgment of the rulers ; but how does all this apply to them ? Have
they the willingness to do? have they the purity and the unsel-
fishness of purpose? This feast of tabernacles was the one pecu-
liarly associated with the reading of the law. "And Moses com-
manded them, saying, At the end of every seven years, in the feast
of tabernacles, when all Israel is come to appear before the Lord thy
God in the place which he shall choose, thou shalt read this law
before all Israel in their hearing, that they may hear, and that they
may learn, and fear the Lord your God, and observe to do all the
words of this law." Deut. 31 : 10-12. It is in presence of the very
men whose duty it was to carry out this ordinance, that Jesus is now
standing. From the first they hated him, and from the time, now
eighteen months ago, that he had cured the paralytic, breaking, as
they thought, the Sabbath, and said that God was his father, making
himself equal with God, they had resolved to kill him. This was the
way — by cherishing hatred and the secret intent to murder — that
they were dealing with the law. Boiling their adverse judgment of
liim back upon themselves, and dragging out to light the purpose
368 THE LIFE OP CHRIST,
that in the meantime they would have kept concealed, Jesus said,
"Did not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you keepeth
the law? Why go ye about to kill me?" Those to whom that
question is more immediately addressed have no answer to give to
It ; but in the crowd are those who, ignorant of the plot against the
life of Jesus, yet sharing in the rulers' contempt and hatred, say
to him, " Thou hast a devil : who goeth about to kill thee ?" Christ
stops not to deal with such a speech, but takes up at once what
had furnished so painful a weapon in the hands of the Pharisees
against him. He refers to that one deed still fresh in the minds
of ail those in Jerusalem. The offence of that one act of his in
curing the impotent man on a Sabbath-day, had been made to
overshadow all his other acts, to overbear all his other claims to
attention and regard. "I have done one work," he said, "and
ye all marvel," as if I had thereby plainly proved myself a breaker
of the Sabbath law. Formerly, before the Sanhedrim, he had
defended himself against this charge of Sabbath breaking by other
and higher arguments. Now, addressing, as he does, the common
people, he takes an instance familiar to them all. The Sabbath law
runs thus : " Thou shalt do no work on the seventh iay. 5 ' How was
this law to be interpreted? If the circumcision of a man on the
seventh day was not a breach of it, and no one thought it was, what
was to be said of the healing of a man upon that day ? If ye on
the Sabbath circumcise a man, and the law of Moses is not broken,
why " are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit
whole on the Sabbath-day?" The analogy was so perfect, and the
question so plain, that no reply was attempted. In the temporary
silence that ensues, some of the citizens of Jerusalem, who were aware
of the secret resolution of the Sanhedrim, struck with wonder at what
they now see and hear, cannot help saying, "Is not this he whom
they seek to kill ? But, lo, he speaketh boldly, and they say nothing
unto him. Do the rulers know indeed that this is the very Christ ?"
We might imagine the words to have come from those who were ready
themselves to see the very Christ in Jesus ; but though they share not
their rulers' persecuting spirit, these men have a prejudice of their
own. It had come to be a very general opinion about this time in
Judea, that the Messiah was to have no common human origin— no
father or mother — he was to be raised from the dead beneath, or to
ocme as an angel from the heavens. His not meeting this require-
ment is enough, with these men, to set aside the claims of Jesus of
Nazareth. "Howbeit," they say, as men quite satisfied with the
sureness of the ground on which they go, " Howbeit we know this
CHRIST AT THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES. 369
man whence he is : but when Christ cometh, no man knoweth whence
he is. Then cried Jesus in the temple as he taught " — such an easy
and self-satisfied way of disposing of the whole question of his Mes-
siahship causing him to lift up his voice in loud and strenuous pro-
test — " Ye both know me, and ye know whence I am : and I am not
come of myself, but he that sent me is true, whom ye know not. But
I know him : for I am from him, and he hath sent me." The old and
oft-repeated truth of his mission from the Father, coupled now with
such a strong assertion of his own knowledge and of these men's
ignorance of who his Father was, they are so irritated as to be dis-
posed to proceed to violence ; but upon them, as upon the rulers,
there is a restraint : " No man laid hands on him, because his hour
was not yet come."
So impressed in his favor have many of the onlookers now
become, that they are bold enough to say, " When Christ cometh,
will he do more miracles than these which this man hath done ?"
As Jesus had done no miracles at this time in Jerusalem, the speak-
ers obviously refer to what he had elsewhere wrought. Their speech
is immediately reported to the Pharisees and chief priests sitting in
council in an adjacent court of the temple, who, so soon as they hear
that the people are beginning to speak openly in his favor, send offi-
cers to take him. With obvious allusion to the errand on which these
men come, as if to tell them how secure he felt, how sure he was that
his comings and his goings in the future would be all of his own
free will, Jesus says, " Yet a little while am I with you, and then I
go to him that sent me. Ye shall seek me, and shall not find me :
and where I am, thither ye cannot come ;" words very plain to us,
but very dark to those who have no other interpretation to put upon
them but that he may mean perhaps to leave Judea and go to the
dispersed among the Gentiles. Little, however, as they were under-
stood, there was such a tone of quiet yet sad assurance about them,
that the high priests' officers pause, and return to give this to their
employers as the reason why they had not executed the order given
tliem, " Never man spake like this man."
So ended out- Lord's first day of teaching in the temple, a day
revealing on his part a wisdom, a courage, a serene, sublime, untrou-
bled trust which took his adversaries by surprise, and held all their
deadly purposes against him in suspense, and on the part of the mul-
titude the strangest mixture of conflicting opinions and sentiments,
with which our Lord so dealt as to win exemption from like interrup-
tions afterwards, and to secure for himself an unbroken audience an
the day when his last and greatest words were spoken.
Life of Olii-Ut 24
370 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
The feast of tabernacles was instituted to commemorate the time
when the Israelites had dwelt in tents during their sojourn in the des-
ert. To bring the remembrance of those long years of tent-life more
vividly before them, the people were enjoined, during the seven days
that it lasted, to leave their accustomed homes, and to dwell in booths
or huts made of gathered branches of the palm, the pine, the myrtle,
or other trees of a like thick foliage. It must have been a strange
spectacle when, on the day before the feast, the inhabitants of Jeru-
salem poured out from their dwellings, spread themselves over the
neighborhood, stripped the groves of their leafiest branches, brought
them back to rear them into booths upon the tops of their houses,
along the leading stree s, and in some of the outer courts of the
temple. The dull, square, stony aspect of the city suffered a singu-
lar metamorphosis as these leafy structures met everywhere the eye.
It was the great Jewish harvest-home ; for this feast was celebrated
in autumn, after all the fruits of the earth had been gathered in. It
was^within the temple that its joyous or thanksgiving character espe-
cially developed itself. Morning and evening, day by day, during
•sacrifices more crowded than those of any other of the great festivals,
the air was rent with the praises of the rejoicing multitudes. At the
time of the libation of water, the voice of their glad thanksgiving
swelled up into its fullest and most jubilant expression. Each morn-
ing a vast procession formed itself around the little fountain of Siloam
down in the valley of the Kedron. Out of its flowing waters the
priests filled a large golden pitcher. Bearing it aloft, they climbed
the steep ascent of Moriah, passed through the water-gate, up the
broad stairs, and into the court of the temple, in whose centre the
altar stood. Before this altar two silver basins were planted, with
holes beneath to let the liquid poured into them flow down into the
subterranean reservoir beneath the temple, to run out thence into the
Kedron, and down into the Dead sea. One priest .stood and poured
the water he had brought up from Siloam into one of these basins.
Another poured the contents of a like pitcher filled with wine into
the other. As they did so, the vast assemblage broke out into the
most exalting exclamations of joy. The trumpets of the temple
sounded. In voice and upon instrument, the trained choristers put
forth all their skill and power. Led by them, many thousand voices
chanted the Great Hallel, (the Psalms from the 113th to the 118th, )
pausing at the verses on which the chief emphasis was placed to
wave triumphantly in the air the branches that they all bore, and
make the welkin ring with their rejoicing. This was the happiest,
service in all the yearly ceremonial of Judaism. "He," said the old
CHRIST AT THE FEAST OF TABERNACLES. 371
Jewish proverb, " who has never seen the rejoicing at the pouring
out of the waters of Siloam, has never seen rejoicing all his life." All
this rejoicing was connected with that picturesque proceeding by
which the Lord's providing water for his people in their desert wan-
derings was symbolized and commemorated. And few, if any, have
ioubted that it was with direct allusion to this daily pouring out ol
the waters of Siloam, which was so striking a feature of the festival,
that on the last, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried,
" If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink." ' Your fore-
fathers thirsted in the wilderness, and I smote the rock for them, so
that the waters flowed forth. I made a way for them in the wilder-
ness, and gave rivers in the desert to give drink to my people — my
chosen. But of what was that thirst of theirs, and the manner in
which I met it, an emblem ? Did not Isaiah tell you, when in my
name he spake, saying, " I will pour water on him that is thirsty, and
floods upon the dry ground. I will pour my Spirit upon thy seed,
and my blessing upon thine offspring. When the poor and needy
seek water, and there is none, and their tongue faileth for thirst, I the
Lord will hear them, I the God of Israel will not forsake them. I
will open rivers in high places, and fountains in the midst of the val-
leys. I will make the wilderness a pool of water, and the dry land
springs of w T ater?" And now I am here to fulfil in person all the
promises that I made by the lips of my servant Isaiah, and I gather
them up and condense them in the invitation, " If any man thirst, let
him come unto me and drink." '
" If any man thirst !" Ah ! the Saviour knew it of these rejoicing
Israelites, that glad and grateful as they were for the land that they
had entered into out of the wilderness — no dry and thirsty land, but
one of springs ard of rivers, of the early and the latter rain — there
was a thirst that none of its fountains could quench, a hunger that
none of its fruitage could satisfy. And he knows it of us, and of all
men, that a like deep inward thirst dries up our spirit, a like deep
inward hunger is ever gnawing at our heart. Are there no desires,
and longings, and aspirations in these souls of ours that nothing
earthly can meet and satisfy ? Not money, not honor, not power, not
pleasure, not any thing nor every thing this world holds out — they do
not, cannot fill our hearts — they do not, cannot quench that thirst
that burns within. Can any one tell us where we may carry this great
thirst and get it fully quenched? From the lips of the man Christ
Jesus the answer comes. He speaks to the crowds in the temple at
Jerusalem, but his words are not for them alone ; they have been
given to the broad heavens, to be borne wide over all the earth, and
372 THE LIFE OF OHEIST.
down through all its generations : "If any man thirst, let him come
unto me and drink." Thirsty we know we are, and thirsty shall
remain till we hear these gracious words, and hearing come, and
coming drink, and drinking get the want supplied. Yes, we believe—
Lord help our unbelief — that there is safety, peace, rest, refreshment,
joy for these weary aching hearts in thee, the well-spring of our eter-
nal life.
" He that believeth on me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his
belly shall flow rivers of living water." Below the spot on which Jesus
stood when speaking in the courts of the temple, there lay vast sub-
terranean vaults, whose singular recesses have only recently been
explored. Descending into them, you get a glimpse, by help of
dimly burning tapers, of a vast cistern below the site of the ancient
temple. Whether this large reservoir be filled wholly from without,
or has a spring of living waters supplying it from below, remains to
be ascertained. Enough, however, has been discovered to stamp with
truth the ancient Jewish stories about the great cistern, " whose com-
pass was as the sea," and about the unfailing waters of the temple.
Nor can we any longer doubt that it was to these subterranean supplies
of water that the prophet Joel alluded when he said, " It shall come
to pass in that day that a fountain shall come forth out of the house
of the Lord, and shall water the valley of Shittim ;" that the prophet
Zechariah alluded to when he said, "It shall be in that day that
living waters shall go out from Jerusalem, half of them turned
toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder ;" that still
more pointedly the prophet Ezekiel alluded to when he said, " After-
ward he brought me again into the door of the house, and behold
waters issued out from under the threshold of the house eastward,
and the waters came down from under the right side of the house, at
the south side of the altar." And as little can we doubt that Jesus
had these very scriptures in his thoughts, and that cavity beneath
his feet in his eye, when he said, " He that believeth on me, as the
Scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water."
'He that believeth shall not barely and alone have his own thirst
assuaged, but I in him, by my Spirit given, moulding him into my
own likeness, shall turn him into a separate w T ell-head, from whose
depths rivers of living water shall flow forth to visit, gladden, fruc-
tify some lesser or larger portion of the arid waste around.' Let us
know and remember then, that Jesus, the Divine assuager of the
thirst of human hearts, imparts the blessing to each who comes to
him, that he may go and impart the blessing to others. He comforts
us with a sense of his presence, guidance, protection, sympathy, thai
JESUS THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD. 373
we may go and console others with that same comfort wherewith we
have been comforted of him. He never gives that we may selfishly
hoard the treasure that w T e get. That treasure, like the bread that
was broken for the thousands on the hillside of Galilee, multiplies in
-he hand that takes it to divide and to distribute.
V.
Jesus the Light of the World.*
Jesus was in the treasury. It stood at the north side of one of
those large enclosures called the Court of the Women, which lay oui>-
side the temple properly so called, and in which, on all the great
annual festivals, crowds were wont daily to assemble. In the centre
of this court, at the feast of tabernacles, two tall stands were placed,
each supporting four large branching candelabra. As at the time of
the morning sacrifice, the procession wound its way up from the
fountain of Siloam, and the water was poured out from the golden
pitcher to remind the people of the supply of water that had been
made for their forefathers during the desert wanderings ; so after the
evening sacrifice all the lights in these candelabra were kindled, the
flame broad and brilliant enough to illuminate the whole city, to
remind the people of the pillar of light by which their marchings
through the wilderness were guided. And still freer and heartier
than the morning jubilations which attended on the libation of the
water, were the evening ones, which accompanied the kindling of the
lights. It was with allusion to the one ceremony that Jesus said,
"If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink." It was with
allusion to the other, of which both he and those around him were
reminded by the stately chandeliers which stood at the time before
their eyes, that he said, " I am the light of the world ; he that follow-
eth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."
In uttering both these sayings, Jesus placed himself in a singular and
elevated relationship to the whole human family. In the one he
invited the entire multitude of human thirsters to come to him to
have their thirst assuaged. In the other, he claimed to be the one
central source of light and life to the whole world. Is it surprising
that as they looked at him, and heard him speaking in this way, and
thought of who and what, according to their reckoning he was, the
Jews should have seen egotism and arrogance in his words ? There
» John 8:12-59.
374 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
was in truth the very utmost pitch of such arrogance and egotism in
them, had the speaker been such as they deemed him, a man like
themselves. But one of his very objects in speaking so was tc con-
vince them and us that he was not such — that he stood toward the
human family in quite other relationship from that in which an*
single member could stand to all the rest — that besides his conuec*
tion with it, he had another and higher connection, that with his
Father in heaven, which entitled him to speak and act in a way
peculiar to himself. By word and deed, again and again repeated,
Jesus had sought in vain to convey into the minds of these Jews an
idea of how singular that connection was. He tries now once again,
and once again he fails. Instead of their asking, ' Who is this that
offers to quench all human thirst, and who proclaims himself to be
the light of the world ?' saying to themselves in reply, ' He must be
more than human, he must be divine ; for who but One could claim
such a prerogative and power ?' they listen only to find something to
object to, and, grasping greedily at what lay on the very surface of
the sayings, they say to him, " Thou bearest record of thyself ; thy
record is not true." Perhaps they had our Lord's own words on the
occasion of the former visit to Jerusalem on their memory : " If Ibeai
witness of myself, my witness is not true." He was speaking then of
a solitary unsupported testimony — a testimony imagined to be borne
by himself, to himself, and for himself, as one seeking to advance his
own interests, promote his own glory. Such a testimony, had he
borne it, he had then said would be altogether untrustworthy. His
answer now to those who would taunt him at once with egotism and
inconsistency is, " Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is
true : for I know whence I came, and whither I go." ' Had I not
known that I came forth from the Father and am going back to the
Father, that I am here only as his representative and revealer — did
the consciousness of full, clear, constant union with him not fill my
spirit — I would not, could not speak as I now do. But I know the
Father, even as I am known by him ; he works, and I work with
him ; whatsoever things he doeth I do likewise. It is out of the
depth of the consciousness of my union with him that I speak, and
what man knoweth the things of a man save the spirit of man that is
in him ; and how else are you ever to know what can alone be known
by my revealing it, if I do not speak of myself, or do not speak as he
only can who stands in the relationship in which I do to the Father
'But "ye cannot tell whence I come and whither I go." You
never gave yourselves any trouble to find it out. You never opened
mind or heart to the evidence that I laid before you. What early
JESUS THE LIGHT OF THE WOULD. 375
alienated you from nie was that I came riot accredited as you would
have desired, submitted no proofs of my heavenly calling to you for
your approval, made no obeisance to 3^011 on entering on my career,
came not up here to seek instruction at your hands, asked not from
you any liberty to act as a scribe, a teacher of the law — instead of
this, claimed at once this temple as my Father's house, condemned
the way in which you were suffering its sacred precincts to be defiled,
and have ever since, in all that I have said and done, been lifting up
a constant, loud, and strenuous protest against you and your ways.
You sit now in judgment upon me— you condemn me. You say that
I am bearing record of myself, and that my record is not true ; but
"ye judge after the flesh." You have allowed human prejudice,
human passion, to fashion your judgment. I so judge no man. It
was not to judge that I came into this world. I came not to con-
demn, but to save it. And yet if I judge, as in one sense I must, and
am even now about to do, my judgment is true, for I am not alone,
but I and the Father that sent me judge, as we do every thing,
together. Your own very law declares, " that the testimony of two
men is true." I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father
that sent me beareth witness of me.'
As if they wished this second witness to be produced, they say to
him contemptuously, " Where is thy Father ? Jesus answered, Ye
neither know me, nor my Father." ' You think that you know me,
you pride yourselves in not being deceived in me as the poor ignor-
ant multitude is — my earthly pedigree, as believed in by you, satis-
fies you as to my character and claims. You can scarcely, after all
that I have said, have failed to perceive whom I meant when I was
speaking of my Father. Him, too, you think you know ; you pride
yourselves on your superior acquaintance with him, you present your-
selves to the people as the wisest and best expounders of his will and
law. But " ye neither know me, nor my Father ;" for to know the one
is to know the other — to remain ignorant of the one is to remain
ignorant of the other. It is your want of all true knowledge of me
that keeps you from knowing God. It is the want of all true knowl-
edge of God that keeps you from knowing me. Had you known me,
you would have known him ; had you known him, you Avould have
known me.'
So fared it with our Lord's declaration that he was the light of
Ihe world, as it was at first spoken in the temple ; so ended the first
brief colloquy with the Jews to which its utterance gave birth.
There was one, however, of its first hearers, upon whom it made a
very different impression from that it made on the rulers of the Jews,
376 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
who treasured it up in his heart, who saw ever, as his Master's life
evolved itself before him, more and more evidence of its truth, whose
spirit was afterwards enlightened to take in a truer, larger idea of the
place and function of his Lord in the spiritual kingdom than has
ever, perhaps, been given to another of the children of men, who, on
this account, was chosen of the Lord to set them forth in his gospel
And in his epistles, and who has given to us this explanation of the
words of his Master: "In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the
beginning with God. All things were made by him ; and without
him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life ; and
the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness ;
and the darkness comprehendeth it not." John " came for a witness,
to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into
the world." " And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us,
(andrwe beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the
Father,) full of grace and truth." " That which was from the begin-
ning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which
we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of
life, for the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear wit-
ness, and show unto you that eternal life which was with the Father,
and was manifested unto us." " This is the true God and eternal life."
Such is the description John has left us of him who spiritually is the
sun of this dark w r orld, the central source of all its life and light. The
life and light of the soul lie in the love of its Creator, in likeness to
him, communion with him, in free glad service rendered, the joy of
his approval felt. Freshly, fully was life and light enjoyed by man
in the days of his innocence ; the light of God's gracious presence
shone upon his soul, and gladdened all his heart. Made in his Ma-
ker's image, he walked confidingly, rejoicingly, in the light of his coun-
tenance, reflecting in his own peaceful, loving, holy, happy spirit as
much as such mirror could of the glory of his Creator. He diso-
beyed and died; the light went out; at one stride came the dark,
But the gloom of that darkness, the stillness of that death, were
not suffered to prevaiL From the beginning life and light have
gone forth from Christ ; all the spiritual animation that this world
anywhere has witnessed, all the spiritual light by which its darkness
has been alleviated, spring from him. The great Sun of Bighteous-
Bess, indeed, seemed long in rising. It was a time of moon and stars
*nd morning twilight till he came. But at last he arose, with heal-
JESUS THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD. 377
Log in his beams. And now it is by coming unto him that death is
turned into life, and darkness into light. He that hath him hath
life, he that followeth him walketh not in darkness, but has the light
of life.
The short colloquy between Christ and the Pharisees, consequent
upon his announcement of himself as the light of the world, ended in
their lips being for the moment closed. The silence that ensued was
speedily broken by our Lord's repeating what he had said before
about his going away — going where they could not follow. The
speech had formerly excited only wonder, and they had said among
themselves, "Will he go unto the dispersed among the Gentiles?"
Now their passion against him has so risen that it excites contempt,
and they say openly, not indeed to him, but of him, " Will he kill
himself ?*' ? That would indeed be to go where we could not follow.
Perhaps that may be what he means.' The drawing of such a dis-
tinction between themselves and him gives Jesus the opportunity of set-
ting forth the real and radical difference that there was between them.
The portraiture of their character and pedigree which, with truthful
and unsparing hand, he proceeded to fill up, amid many rude breaks
and scornful interruptions on their part, we shall not minutely scru-
tinize. One or two things only about the manner of our Lord's treat-
ment of his adversaries in this word-battle with them, let us note.
He does not say explicitly that he is the Christ. His questioners
were well aware what kind of person their Messiah was generally ex-
pected to be, how different from all that Jesus was. They would provoke
him to make a claim which they knew would be generally disallowed
He will not do it. When they say, " Who art thou ?" he contents
himself by saying, ' I am essentially or radically that which I speak ;
my sayings reveal myself, and tell who and what I am.' In this, as
in so many other instances of his dealing with those opposed to him
at Jerusalem, his sayings were confined to assertions or revelations,
not of his Messiahship, but of his unity of nature, will, and purpose
with the Father. This was the great stumbling-block that the Jews
found ever and anon flung down before them. That in all which
Jesus was and said and did he was to be taken as revealing the char-
acter and expressing the will of God, was what they never could allow,
and the more that the idea of a connection between him and God
apprr aching to absolute identification was pressed upon them, the
more tney resented and rejected it. But why? Jesus himself told
thorn Their unbelief, he constantly asserted, sprung from a moralh
impure source ; from an unwillingness to come into such living con-
tact with the Father • from their dislike to the purity, the beiievo
378 THE LIFE OF CHRIST,
;
lence, the godliness that were in him as in the Father. When driven
from the position they first assumed as children of Abraham, they
claimed a still higher paternity, and said, " We have one Father, eve
God." Our Lord's reply was, " If God were your Father, ye woul
?ove me, for I proceeded forth and came from God ; neither came I
yf myself, but he sent me. Why do ye not understand my speech ?
even because ye cannot hear my word."
They wore a mask ; behind that mask they hid a malicious dis-
position, and so long as deceitfulness and malignity ruled their spirit
and regulated their lives, children of Abraham, children of God, they
were not, could not be. Thty might boast what other parentage
they pleased, but their works proclaimed that they were none other
than the children of him who was a liar and a murderer from the
beginning. " Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your
father ye will do." Yery plain language, and very severe — not lan-
guage for man to use to man — suitable alone for him who knew what
was-in man, who came as its light into the world, and discharged one
of his offices as such in laying bare the hidden corruption with which
he came into contact, for " all things that are reproved are manifest
by the light, for whatsoever doth make manifest is light."
" But as he spake these words many believed on him," and for
them, amid all his rebukes of his enemies, this was his word of
encouragement, that if they continued in his word, if they but fol-
lowed faithfully the light that shone in him, they should know the
truth, know him who was the truth, and in him, and by that truth,
they should be made free. These Jews imagined that simply as the
children of Abraham they were free. So fondly did they cling to this
idea, that often as the yoke of the stranger had been on them, they
were ready proudly to say, " We were never in bondage to any man."
Notwithstanding this, they were slaves — slaves to sin and Satan. In
one sense they were in God's house, numbered outwardly as members
of its household ; but being actually such slaves, in that house they
could not abide for ever. But if he who was not a servant in the
house of another, but an heir in his own house — his Father's house—
if he made his followers free, then were they free indeed. And into
what a glorious liberty should they thus be introduced ! freedom from
the Law, its curse and condemnation ; freedom from the yoke of Jew-
ish and all other ceremonialism ; freedom from the fear of guilt and
the bondage of corruption ; freedom to serve God willingly and lov-
ingly — to be all, do all, suffer all which his will requires— this was
the liberty wherewith Christ was ready to make free. This freedom
was to be tasted but in imperfect measure by any here on earth, for
JESUS THE LIGHT OF THE WOELD. 379
still onward to the end the old tyrant whose subjects they had been,
would be making his presence and power felt ; still onward to the
end, while the mind was serving the law of God, a law would be iu
the members warring against the law of the mind. But the hour of
a final and complete emancipation was to come at death. Death ! ii
looked to nature like the stoppage of ail life, the breaking of all ties,
the quenching of all freedom and all joy. Not such was it to be to
him who shared the life that Jesus breathes into the soul. To him
it was to be rather light than darkness, rather life than death, the
scattering of every cloud, the breaking of every fetter, the deliver-
ance from e\erj foe, the setting of the spirit absolutely and for ever
free to soar with unchecked, unshadowed wing, up to the fountain-
head of all life and blessedness, to bask in the sunshine for ever.
" Verily, verily, if a man keep my sayings, he shall never see death."
But now let us look a moment at the special testimonies to his
own person and character which, upon this occasion, and in the
course of these rough conflicts with scornful and contemptuous oppo-
nents, Jesus bore. Light is its own revealer. The sun can be seen
alone in the beams that he himself sends forth. So is it with him
who is the light of the world. It is in the light of his own revelation
of himself that we can see Jesus as he is. And what, as seen in the
beams that he here sheds forth, does he appear? Two features of
his character stand prominently displayed : his sinless holiness, his
preexistence and divine dignity. In proof of the stainless purity of
his nature and his life, Jesus when here on earth made a threefold
appeal. He appealed to earth, to hell, to heaven, and earth, hell,
and heaven each gave its answer back. Two of these appeals you
have in the passage that is now before us. Jesus appealed to earth
when, looking round upon those men who with the keen eye of jeal-
ousy and hatred had been watching him from the beginning to see
what flaws they could detect in him, he calmly and confidently said,
1 Which of you convinceth me of sin, of any sin, the slightest trans-
gression ?' And earth gave her answer when these men stood speech-
less before him.
He appealed to hell — to that devil of whom he spoke so plainly
as the father of all liars and all murderers, who would have accused
and maligned him had he dared. " The prince of this world oometh
and findeth nothing in me" — nothing of his own, nothing that he car.
claim, no falsehood, no malice, no selfishness, no unholiness in me.
And hell gave its answer when the devil, whom Christ's word of
power drove forth from his human habitation, was heard to say, " J
know thee who thou art, the Holy One of God."
:i80 the life of christ.
" Again, our Saviour carried the appeal to heaven, and, standing
in the presence of the Great Searcher of all hearts, he said, in words
that had been blasphemous from any merely human lips, " I do
always those things that please him." And thrice during his mortal
sareer the heavens opened above his head, and the voice of the Father
was heard proclaiming, " This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well
pleased."
What shall we think or say of him who claimed such perfect
immunity from sin — the entire absence of any thing that could draw
down upon it the Divine displeasure, the full presence of all that
could draw down upon it the Divine approval ? Was he, who knew
others so well, ignorant of himself ? or, conscious of transgression, did
he yet deny it? Ignorant beyond other men, a hypocrite worse than
those whom he charged with hypocrisy, must Jesus Christ have been,
if, in speaking of his sinlessness as he did, his speech was not the free
and natural expression of a self-consciousness of perfect purity, truth,
and holiness of heart and life. In presence of one realizing such
unstained perfection, who never once, in thought or word, or deed,
swerved from the right, the true, the good, the holy, how humbled
should we be under the consciousness of how different it is with us ;
and yet with that sense of humiliation should not the elevating, enno-
bling thought come in, that he in whom the sublime idea of a sinless
perfection stands embodied, was no other than our Lord and Saviour,
who came to show us to what a height this weak and sinful humanity
of ours could be raised, who became partaker of our nature that we
through him might become partakers of the Divine, and of whom we
know that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see
him as he is.
" Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day, and he saw it and
was glad." Christ's day was no other than that of his manifestation
in the flesh. Abraham rejoiced that he should see that day, and
lived his earthly life cheered by the animating prospect. And he saw
it, as Moses and Elijah did; for he was one of those who, in Christ's
sense of the words, had not tasted of death, of whom it was witnessed
that he liveth, to whom in the realms of departed spirits the knowl-
edge of the Redeemer's advent had been conveyed.
Jesus had said that Abraham had seen his day. They twist his
words as if he had said that he had seen Abraham. " Thou art not
yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham ?" The contemptu-
ous query gives to our Lord the opportunity of lifting the veil that
concealed his glory, and making the last, the greatest revelation of
himself . " Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.'
OUTLINE STUDIES. 381
Not simply, " Before Abraham was, I was," not simply a declaration of
a being before Abraham, but a taking to himself the great, the incom-
municable name, carrying with it the assertion of self-existence, of
supreme divinity. So they understood it, who instantly took up
stones to stone him as a blasphemer. And so let us understand it,
not taking up stones to stone him, but lifting up hearts and hands
together to crown him Lord of all.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
Christ is still at Jerusalem during this Study, and through miracle
and teaching brings the challenge of his claims yet more pointedly
before those who had resented the idea of his being the light. Taking
a man blind from his birth, probably sitting at the very temple gates,
he brings light to the eyes that have never seen. Not only Jesus'
deed, but the unanswerable reasoning of the man, stirs up the Pharisees
to cast out of the synagogue the one who has been healed. Jesus finds
him in the temple and asks, " Dost thou believe on the Son of God ? "
The man hears the voice of the wonderful Helper, who, when the
disciples were inquiring whether it was himself or his parents' sin that
caused his condition, had asserted in a tone of gentle authority that it
was neither; and had then put upon his eyes the strange dressing,
and with the same sweetly compelling authority had told him to go
to the pool of Siloam and wash, Now by that marvellous power of
using his eyes at once as well as having their sight restored, he looks
upon the one who has healed him, and asks, " Who is he, Lord? that
I might believe on him." Jesus answers, " Thou hast both seen him,
and it is he that talketh with thee." At once the man declares his
belief and worships Christ. These last steps, as well as the man's
remarkable defence of the true character of his healer before the
Pharisees, show that there was something inherently strong and noble
about this humble nature.
Then when a later opportunity is afforded, Jesus asserts, in the face
of the men who assume that they can open and close the kingdom of
God, that he alone is the real Door and the Shepherd of the sheep,
that others, even the Gentiles, are to be brought to become one flock
with genuine Jewish believers; that the Good Shepherd has power
through the sacrifice of his life to keep forever those who come to him ;
and that he is one with the Father.
It is impossible to resist the conclusion that Christ meant to claim
essential unity of nature and attributes between himself and the
381a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Father, in his statements to the Jews at the feast of Dedication as well
as at other times. When he says, " I and my Father are one," they
understand that he makes such a claim, and they take up stones to
stone him, and later they declare, " For a good work we stone thee not,
but for blasphemy, and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself
God." Had Christ regarded this meaning which they give to his
words as an error, it would have been easy for him to have corrected
it and to have kept them from continuing to hold the impression which
his words had given them, but he makes no effort to do this. Rather,
he proceeds in his discourse to a point where, because of other assertions,
they seek to take him to deal with him as a blasphemer, but he escapes
out of their hands. Properly therefore does the author say: " That
neither upon this nor upon any other occasion of the same kind did our
Lord complain of being condemned mistakenly when regarded as
being guilty of blasphemy, nor offer the explanation which at once
would have set aside the charge, we regard as the clearest of all proofs
that the Jews were not in error in interpreting his sayings as they
did" (p. 402).
PART III. MAIN MINISTRY IN JUDEA AND PER^EA.
Study 12. Further Words and Works of Grace at Jerusalem.
(1) Cure of the man born blind 3816-390
a. Jesus sees the blind man 3816
6. He corrects a mistaken view as to the man's affliction 382
c. He cites other cases in proof 382-384
d. He brings comforting truth to the man's mind 384, 385
e. He anoints the eyes and bids the man go wash in the pool of Siloam . 385
/. The man receives his sight 385, 386
g. The Pharisees vainly seek to disprove the divine glory of the
miracle 386-388
h. They excommunicate the man 388
i. Jesus further discloses himself to him 389, 390
(2) Christ the Gogd Shepherd 390-402
a. Blinding result for those who will not see 390, 391
b. Marks of the good shepherd 391
c. The real door for the sheep 391, 392
d. Christ clearly declares himself the Good Shepherd 392
e. Relations in which he stands to the sheep 392-397
THE CURE OF THE MAN BORN BLIND. 3816
/. Other sheep, one flock, one shepherd 397
g. Probable sojourn in Galilee 397
h. Return to Jerusalem at Feast of Dedication 397
i. Further shepherd comparisons 398-401
j. Oneness with the Father 401, 402
VI.
The Cure of the Man Born Blind.*
Within the court of the temple, in presence of the Pharisees and
their satellites, Jesus had said, " I am the light of the world : he that
followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."
The saying, resented as egotistical and arrogant, led on to that alter-
cation which ended in their taking up stones to cast at him, and in his
hiding himself in some mysterious way and passing out of the temple,
" going through the midst of them." At one of the temple-gates, or
by the roadside without, " as Jesus passed by he saw a man which was
blind from his birth " — a well-known city beggar, whom Jesus and
his disciples may have often passed in their way up to the temple.
Now, at the very time when we might have imagined him more than
ordinarily desirous to proceed in haste, in order to put himself beyond
the reach of the exasperated men out of whose hands he had jnst
escaped, Jesus stops to look compassionately upon this man. He
sees in him a fit subject for a work being done, which, in the lower
sphere of man's physical nature, shall illustrate the truth which he
had in vain been proclaiming in the treasury, that he was the light of
the world. As he stops, his disciples gather round him, and fix their
eyes also upon the man whose case has arrested their Master's foot-
steps, and seems to have absorbed his thoughts. But their thoughts
are not as his. They look, to think only of the rarity and severity of
the affliction under which the man is laboring — to regard it as a judg-
ment of God, whereby some great sin was punished — the man's own, it
would be natural to suppose it should be ; but then, the judgment had
come before any sin had been committed by him — he had been blind
from his birth. Could it be that the punishment had preceded the
offence, or was this a case in which the sins of the parents had been
visited on their child? " Master," they say to Jesus in their perplex-
* John, chap. 9.
382 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
fty, " who did sin, this man or liis parents, that he was born blind ?'
The one thing that they had no doubt about — and in having no suca
doubt, were only sharing in the sentiment of all the most devout of
their fellow-countrymen — was that some signal sin had been com-
•nitted, upon which the signal mark of God's displeasure had been
stamped. It was not as to the existence somewhere of some exceeding
fault that they were in the least uncertain. Their only doubt was
where to lay it. It was the false but deep conviction which lay
beneath their question that Jesus desired to expose and correct when
he so promptly and decisively replied, " Neither hath this man sinned
nor his parents ;" neither the one nor the other has sinned so peculiarly
that the peculiar visitation of blindness from birth has been visited on
the transgression. Not that Jesus meant to disconnect altogether
man's suffering from man's sins. Had he meant to do so, he would
not have said to the paralytic whom he cured at the pool of Bethesda,
" Go thy way, sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon thee ;" but
that he wanted, by a vigorous stroke, to lay the axe at the root of a
prevalent superstitious feeling which led to erroneous and presump-
tuous readings of God's providences, connecting particular sufferings
with particular sins, and arguing from the relative severity of the
one to the relative magnitude of the other.
Nor was this the only instance in which our Saviour dealt in the
same manner with the same popular error. But a few weeks from
the time in which he spake in this way to his disciples, Jesus was
in Persea. There had been a riot in Jerusalem — some petty prem-
ature outburst of that insurrectionary spirit which was rife through-
out Judea. Pilate had let loose his soldiers on the mob. Some
Galileans, who had taken part in the riot, or were supposed to have
done so, for the Galileans were always in the front rar/k of any move-
ment of the kind, were slain — slain even while engaged in the act of
sacrificing, their blood mingled with their sacrifices : an incident so
fitted to strike the public eye, to arouse the public indignation, that
the news of it travelled rapidly through the country. It reached the
place where Christ was teaching. Some of his hearers, s'ruck, per-
haps, by something that he had said about the signs of the times and
the judgments that were impending, took occasion publicly to tell him
of it. Perhaps they hoped that the recital would draw out from him
some burning expressions of indignation, pointed against the foreign
yoke under which the country was groaning ; the deed done by the
Boman governor had been so gross an outrage upon their national
religion, upon the sacredness of the holy temple. If the tellers of the
tale cherished any such expectation, they were disappointed A?
"A Man Blind From his Birth.'
THE CUKE OF THE MAN BOKN BLIND. 883
upon all like occasions, whenever any purely political question was
brought before him, Christ evaded it. He never once touched ox
alluded to that aspect of the story. But there was another side of it,
upon which he perceived that the thoughts of not a few of his hear-
ers were fastened. It was a terrible fate that these slaughtered Gali>
leans had met — not only death by the Eoman sword, but death within
the courts of the temple, death upon the very steps of the altar.
There could be but one opinion as to the deed of their murderers,
those rough Gentile soldiers of Pilate. But the murdered, upon
whom such a dreadful doom had fallen, what was to be thought of
them ? Christ's all-seeing eye perceived that already in the breasts
of many of those around him, the leaven of that censorious, unchar-
itable, superstitious spirit was working, which taught them to attach
all extraordinary calamities to extraordinary crimes. " Suppose ye,"
said Jesus, "that these Galileans were sinners above all Galileans,
because they suffered such things? I tell you nay." To give his
question and his answer a still broader aspect — to take out of them
all that was peculiarly Galilean — he quotes another striking and well-
known occurrence that had recently happened near Jerusalem, a ca-
lamity not inflicted by the hand of man. " Or those eighteen," he
adds, " upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, think ye that they were
sinners above all men that dwelt in Jerusalem ? I tell you nay." He
does not deny that either the slaughtered Galileans or the crushed
Jerusalemites were sinners. He does not say that they did not de-
serve their doom. He does not repudiate or run counter to that strong
instinct of the human conscience, which in all ages has taught it to
trace suffering to sin. "What he does repudiate and condemn is the
application of that principle to specific instances, by those who know
so little, as we do, of the Divine purposes and aims in the separate
events of life — making the temporal infliction the measure of the guilt
from which it is supposed to spring. It is not a wrong thing for the
man himself, whom some sudden or peculiarly severe calamity over-
takes, to search and try himself before his Maker, to see whether
there has not been some secret sin as yet unrepented and unforsaken,
which may have had a part in bringing the calamity upon him. It
was not a wrong thing in Joseph's brethren, in the hour of their great
distress in Egypt, to remember their former conduct, and to say, " We
are verily guilty concerning our brother, therefore is this distress come
upon us." It was not a wrong thing for the king of Besek, when
they cruelly mutilated him, cutting off his thumbs and great toes, to
say, " Threescore and ten kings, having their thumbs and great toes
cut off, gathered their meat under my table. As I have done, so
384 THE LIFE OP OHBI-S'T:
God hath requited nie." But it was a wrong thing in the inhaWtsrttfe
of Melita, when they saw the viper fasten on Paul's hand, to think
and say that " no doubt this man is a murderer, whom, though he hath
escaped the sea, yet vengeance sufYereth not to live." It was a wrong
thing in the widow of Zarephath, when her son fell sick, to say to
Elijah, " What have I to do with thee, O thou man of God ? Art
thou come to call my sins to remembrance, and to slay my son ?" It
was a wrong thing for the friends of Job to deal with their afflicted
brother as if his abounding misfortunes were so many proofs of a like
abounding iniquity. It is a very wrong thing in any of us to pre-
sume so to interpret any single dealing of God with others, particu-
larly of a dark or adverse kind ; for all such dispensations of his prov-
idence have a double character. They may be retributive ; or they
may be simply disciplinary, corrective, protective, purifying. They
may come in anger, or they may be sent in love. And while as to
ourselves it may be proper that we should view them as bearing
messages of warning, we are not at liberty as to others to attribute
to them any other character than that of being the chastenings of
a wise and loving Father.
"Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the
works of God should be manifest in him." Those works — works of
mercy and almighty power — were given to Christ to do, and here was an
opportunity for one of them being done. To pause thus by the way, to
occupy himself with the case of this poor blind beggar, might seem a
waste of time, the more so that the purpose of his persecutors to seize
and to stone him had been so recently and so openly displayed. But
that very outbreak of their wrath foretold to Jesus his approaching
death — the close of his allotted time of earthly labor — and so he
says, " I must work the works of him that sent me while it is day ;
the night cometh, when no man can work. As long as I am in the
world, I am the light of the world." • I said so to those proud and
unbelieving men from whose rough violence I have just escaped. I
will prove now the truth of what I said by bringing the light physi-
cally, mentally, spiritually, to this poor blind beggar.
All this time not a word is spoken by the blind man himself.
Whatever cries for help he may have raised when he heard the foot-
steps of the approaching company, as they stop before him he be-
comes silent. He hears the question about his own sins and his
parents' sins put by strange Galilean tongues to one addressed evi-
dently with the greatest respect. He hears the one thus appealed
to say, with an authority that he wonders at, " Neither hath this man
sinned, nor his parents " — grateful words to the poor man's ear. He
THE CURE OF THE MAN BORN BLIND. 385
may have thought, in common with others, that he had been signally
marked as an object of Divine displeasure. The words that he now
hears may have helped to lift a load off his heart ; already he may be
more grateful to the speaker of these few words than if he had cast
the largest money-gift into his bosom. But the speaker goes farther :
he says that he had been born blind " that the works of God should
bp made manifest in him." If it were not the work of God's anger in
the punishment of his own or his father's sins, what other work could
it be ? And who can this be who is now before him, who speaks of
what he is, and what he does, and what he is about to do, with such
solemnity and self-assurance ? Who can tell us what new thoughts
about himself and the calamity that had befallen him, what new
thoughts about God and his purposes in thus dealing with him, what
wonderings as to who this stranger can be that takes such an interest
in him, what flutterings of hope may have passed through this poor
man's spirit while the brief conversation between Christ and his disci-
ples was going on, and during that short and silent interval which fol-
lowed as Jesus " spat on the ground and made clay of the spittle " ?
This we know, that when Christ approached and laid his hand upon
him, and anointed his eyes with that strange salve, and said to him,
while yet his sightless balls were covered with what would have
blinded for the time a man who saw, " Go wash in the pool of Siloam,"
he had become so impressed as quietly to submit to so singular an
operation, and without a word of arguing or remonstrance to obey
the order given, and to go off to the pool to wash. It lay not far off,
at the base of the hill on which the temple stood, up and around
which he had so often groped his way. He went and washed, and
lo, a double miracle ! — the one wrought within the eyeball, the other
within the mind — each wonderful even among the wonders wrought
by Christ. Within the same compass there is no piece of dead or liv-
ing mechanism that we know of so curious, so complex, so full of nice
adjustments, as the human eye. It was the great Creator's office to
make that eye and plant it in its socket, gifting it with all its varied
powers of motion, outward and inward, and guarding it against all
the injuries to wdiich so delicate an instrument is exposed. It was
the Creator's will that some fatal defect, or some fatal confusion of
its parts and membranes, should from the first have existed in the
eyeball of this man. And who but the Creator could it be that roc
tilled the defect or removed the confusion, bestowing at once upon
the renovated organ the full power of vision ? Such instant recon-
struction of a defective, or mutilated, or disorganized eye, though not
in itself a greater, appears to us a more surprising act of the Divine
U(e of ChritL 25
386 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
power than the original creation of the organ. You watch with ad-
miration the operation of the man who, with a large choice of means
and materials, makes, and grinds, and polishes, and adjusts the set
of lenses of which a telescope is composed. But let some accident
happen whereby all these lenses are broken and crushed together in
one mass of confusion, what would you think of the man who could
out of such materials reconstruct the instrument ? It was such a dis-
play of the Divine power that was made when the man born blind
went and washed and saw.
But however perfect the eye be, it is simply a transmitter of light,
the outward organ by which certain impressions are made upon the
optic nerves, by them to be conveyed to the brain, giving birth there
to the sensations of sight. But these sensations of themselves con-
vey little or no knowledge of the outward world till the observer's
mind has learned to interpret them as signs of the position, forms,
sizes, and distances of the outlying objects of the visible creation. It
is but slowly that an infant learns this language of the eye. It requires
the putting forth of innumerable acts of memory, and the acquiring
by much practice a facility of rapid interpretation. That the man
born blind should be able at once to use his eyes as well as we all do,
it was needed that this faculty should be bestowed on him at once,
without any teaching or training ; and when we fully understand (as
it is somewhat difficult to do) what the powers were which were thus
instantly conveyed, the mental will appear not less wonderful than
the material part of the miracle of our Lord — that part of it too, of
which it is utterly impossible to give any explanation but this, that
there was in it a direct and immediate putting forth of the Divine
power. The skilful hand of the coucher may open the eye that has
been blind from birth, but no human skill or power could convey at
once that faculty of using the eye as we now do, acquired by us in
the forgotten da,ys of our infancy. It may be left to the fanaticism
of unbelief to imagine that it was the clay and the washing which
restored his sight to the man born blind, but no ingenuity of concep-
tion can point us to the natural means by which the gift of perfect
vision could have been at once conferred.
Yet of the fact we have the most convincing proof. It was so pat-
ent and public that there could be no mistake about it. It was sub-
jected to the most searching investigation — to all the processes of a
judicial inquiry. When one so well known as this blind beggar, whcm
so many had noticed on their way up to the temple, was seen walking
among the other worshippers, seeing as well as any of them, the ques-
tion was on all sides repeated, " Is not this he that sat and begged ?"
THE CUBE OF THE MAN BOKN BLIND. 38?
Some said it was ; others, distrusting their own sight, could only say
he was like him ; but he removed their doubts by saying, " I am he."
Then came the question as to how his eyes were opened. He told
them. Somehow or other, he had learned the name of his healer.
"A man that is called Jesus made clay and anointed mine eyes, and
<§aid unto me, Go to the pool of Siloam and wash ; and I went and
washed, and I received sight." But Jesus had not yet been seen
by him ; he knew not where he was. It was so very singular a thing
this that had been done — made more so by its having been done
upon a Sabbath-day — that some of those to whom the tale was told
would not be satisfied till the man went with them to the Pharisees,
sitting in council in a side-chamber of the temple. They put the
same question to him the others had done, as to how he had received
his sight, and got the same reply. Even had Jesus cured him by a
word, they would have regarded it as a breach of the Sabbath, but
when they hear of his making clay and putting it on his eyes, and then
sending him to lave it off in the waters of Siloam — all servile work
forbidden, as they taught — they seize at once upon this circumstance,
and say, " This man is not of God, because he keepeth not the Sab-
bath-day." The question now was not about the cure, which seemed,
in truth, admitted ; but about the character of the curer. Such instant
and peremptory condemnation of him as a Sabbath-breaker roused a
spirit of opposition even in their own court. Joseph was there, or
Nicodemus, or some one of a like sentiment, who ventured, in oppo-
sition to the prevailing feeling, to put the question, " How can a man
that is a sinner do such miracles?" But they are overborne. The
man himself, at least, who is there before them, will not dare to defend a
deed which he sees the majority of them condemn. They turn to him,
and say, " What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes ?"
They are mistaken. Without delay or misgiving, he says at once,
" He is a prophet." They order him to withdraw. They are some-
what perplexed. They wish to keep in hand the charge of Sabbath-
breaking, but how can they do so without admitting the miracle? It
would serve all their purposes could they make it out that there had
been some deception or mistake as to the man's having been born
blind — the peculiar feature of the miracle that had attracted to it
such public notice. They summon his parents, who have honesty
enough to acknowledge that the man is their son, and that he was
born blind ; but as to how it is that he now sees, they are too timid
to say a word. They know that it had been resolved that, if any
man confessed that Jesus was the Christ, he was to be excommuni-
cated — a sentence carrying the gravest consequences, inflicting the
388 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
severest social penalties. But they have great confidence in the
sagacity of their son ; he is quick-witted enough, they think, to extri-
cate himself from the dilemma. "He is of age," they say; "ask
him : he shall speak for himself." He is sent for ; appears again in
their presence, ignorant of what has transpired — of what his parents*
in their terror, may have said. And now, as if their former judgment
against Jesus had been quite confirmed, and stood unquestionable,
they say to him, " Give God the praise " — an ordinary Jewish form
of adjuration. " My son," said Joshua to Achan, " give glory to the
Lord God of Israel, and make confession to him, and tell me now
what thou hast done." And so now these Pharisees to this poor beg-
gar : ■ My son, give God the praise. We know, and do you confess,
that this man is a sinner.' They are again at fault. In blunt, plain
speech, that tells sufiiciently that he will not believe that Jesus is a
sinner simply because they say it, he says, " Whether he be a sinner,
I know not ; one thing I know, that whereas I was blind, now I see."
Balked in their first object to browbeat and overawe him, they will
try again whether they can detect any inconsistency or contradiction
in his testimony, and so they ask him to tell them over again how the
thing had happened. Seeing through all the thin disguise they are
assuming in seeming to be so anxious to get at the truth, he taunts
them, saying, " I have told you already, and ye did not hear ; where-
fore would ye hear it again ? will ye also be his disciples ?" No ambig-
uous confession of discipleship on his part. So at least they took it
who replied, " Thou art his disciple : we are Moses' disciples. We
know that God spake unto Moses ; as for this fellow, we know not from
whence he is." Poor though he be, and altogether at the mercy of
the men before whom he stands, the healed man cannot bear to hear
his healer spoken of in such contemptuous terms. With a courage
that ranks him as the first of the great company of confessors, and
with a wisdom that raises him above all those high-born and well-
taught Pharisees, he says, " Why, herein is a marvellous thing, that
ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes.
Now we know that God heareth not sinners ; but if any man be a wor-
shipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world
began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was
born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing." So
terse, so pungent, so unanswerable the speech, that passion now takes
the place of argument, and the old and vulgar weapon of authority is
grasped and used. Meanly casting his calamity in his teeth, they
say, " Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us ?"
And they cast him out — excommunicated him on the spot.
THE CURE OF THE MAN BORN BLIND. 389
Jesus hears of the wisdom and the fearlessness that he had dis-
played in the defence of the character and doings of his healer, and
of the heavy doom that had in consequence been visited on him, and
throws himself across his path. Meeting him by the way, he says to
him, " Dost thou believe on the Son of God?" Up to this moment he
bad never seen the man who had anointed his eyes with the clay and
bidden him to go and wash in the pool of Siloam. He might not by look
alone have recognized him, but the voice he never could forget. As
soon as that voice is heard, he knows who the speaker is. Much he
might have liked to tell, and much to ask ; but all other questions
are lost in the one that, with such emphasis, the Saviour puts — " Dost
thou believe on the Son of God?" He had heard of men of God,
prophets of God, the Christ of God ; but the Son of God — one claim-
ing the same kind of paternity in God that every true son claims in
his father — such a one he had never heard of. " Who is he, Lord ?"
he asks, " that I might believe on him. And Jesus said unto him,
Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that talketh with thee." Never
but once before that we remember — never but to the woman of Sama-
ria — was so clear, so direct, so personal a revelation of himself made
by Jesus Christ. In both — the woman by the wellside, the blind beg-
gar by the wayside — Jesus found simplicity and candor, quickness of
intelligence, openness to evidence, readiness to confess. Both followed
ihe light already given. Both, before any special testimony to his
own character was borne by Jesus himself, acknowledged him to be
a prophet. Both thus stepped out far in advance of the great mass
of those around them — in advance of many who were reckoned as dis-
ciples of the Lord. The man's, however, was the fuller and firmer
faith. It had a deeper foundation to rest on. Jesus exhibited to the
woman such a miracle of knowledge as drew from her the exclama-
tion. " Sir, I perceive thou art a prophet." Upon the man he wrought
such a miracle of power and love as begat within the deep conviction
that he was a true worshipper of God, a faithful doer of the Divine
will, a man of God, a prophet of God ; and to this conviction he had
adhered before the frowning rulers, and in face of all that they could
do against him. He had risked all, and lost much, rather than deny
such faith as he had in Jesus. And to him the fuller revelation was
imparted. Jesus only told the woman of Samaria that it was the
Messiah — the Christ of God — who stood before her. He told the
man that it was the Son of God that stood before him. How far the
discovery of his Sonship to God — his true and proper diviuity — went
beyond that of his Messiahship, we shall have occasion heron ft or
to unfold. But see how instantaneous the faith that follows the meat
390 THE LIFE OF OHKIST.
and unexpected disclosure. "Who is he, Lord," 'the Son of God of
whom you speak ?' " I that speak unto thee am he. And he said,
Lord, I believe, and he worshipped him ;" worshipped him as few of
his immediate followers yet had done ; worshipped him as Thomas
and the others did when they had the great miracle of the resurrection
and the sight of the risen Saviour to establish and confirm their faith.
What shall we say of this quick faith and its accompanying worship,
evidences as they were of a fresh full tide of light poured into this
man's mind ? Shall we say that here another miracle was wrought —
an inward and spiritual one, great and wonderful as that when, by
the pool-side of Siloam, he washed those sightless eyeballs, and as he
washed the clear, pure, bubbling water showed itself — the first bright
object that met his opening vision — and he lifted up his eyes and
looked around, and the hills of Zion and of Olivet, and the fair val-
ley of the Kedron, burst upon his astonished gaze ? That, perhaps,
were wrong : for, great as the work of God's Holy Spirit is in enlight-
ening and quickening the human soul, it is not a miraculous one, and
should not be spoken of as such. But surely, of the two — the open-
ing of the bodily and the opening of the spiritual vision — the latter
was God's greater and higher gift.
L
VII.
The Good jShepherd.*
The blind beggar of Jerusalem was healed. How different the
impression and effect of this healing upon the man himself, on the
one side, and the Pharisees, his excommunicators, on the other!
He, a poor, uneducated, yet simple-minded, simple-hearted man,
grasping with so firm a hold, and turning to such good account the
knowledge that he had, and eager to have more ; reaping, as the fruit
of Christ's act of mercy met in such a spirit, the unfolding by our
Lord himself of his highest character and office : they, the guides and
Leaders of the people, so well taught and so wise, unable to discredit
the miracle, yet seizing upon the circumstance that it was done upon
the Sabbath, and turning this into a reproach, their prejudices fed
and strengthened, their eyes growing more blinded, their hearts more
hardened against Christ. This contrast appears to have struck the
mind of our Lord himself. It was in the temple, the only place
« John 5:39^1; 10,1-39.
THE GOOD SHEPHERD. 391
where he could meet his fellow- men while under the ban of the
Sanhedrim, that the healed man met Jesus. They may have been
alone, or nearly so, when Christ put the question, " Dost thou be-
lieve on the Son of God?" and having got the answer which showed
what readiness there was to receive further light, made the great dis-
closure of his Divinity. Soon, however, a number of the Pharisees
approach, attracted by the interview. As he sees, compares, con-
trasts the two — the man and them — he says, " For judgment am I
come into this world, that they which see not" (as this poor blind
beggar) "may see, and that they which see" (as the Pharisees)
? might be made blind." The Pharisees are not so blind as not to
perceive the drift and bearing of the speech. They mockingly
inquire, "Are we blind also?" "If ye were blind," is our Lord's
reply, ' utterly blind, had no power or faculty of vision/ " ye should
have no sin : but now ye say, "We see." * You think you see ; you
pride yourselves on seeing so much better and so much farther than
others. Unconscious of your existing blindness, you will not come
to me to have your eyes opened : will not submit to the humbling
operation at my hands : therefore your sin remaineth, abides, and
accumulates upon you. Here was a poor stricken sheep, whom ye,
claiming to be the shepherds of the flock, have cast out from your
fold, whom I have sought and found. Let me tell you who and what
a true shepherd of God's flock is. He is one that enters by the door
into the sheepfold, to whom the porter opens readily the door,
whoso voice the sheep are quick to recognize, who calleth his own
sheep by name, going before them and leading them out. He is a
stranger, a thief, a robber, and no true shepherd of the sheep, who
will not enter by the door, but climbeth up some other way.' Acute
enough to perceive that this was said concerning human shepherds
generally, leaders or pastors of the people — intended to distinguish
the true among such from the false — and that some allusion to them
selves was intended, Christ's hearers were yet at a loss to know what
the door could be of which he was speaking, and who the thieves and
robbers were. Dropping, therefore, all generality and all ambiguity,
Jesus adds, " Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the
sheep." ' I have been, I am, I ever shall be, the one and only door
of entrance and of exit, both for shepherds and for sheep. All that
ever came before me, without acknowledging me, independently of
f us wherever we are as distinctly as he saw Nathanael under the
fig-tiee, Zaccheus upon the sycamore-tree, as knowing all about our
past history as minutely as he knew all about that of the woman by
the well-side, sympathizing as truly and tenderly with all our spiritual
trials and sorrows as he did with those of Peter and the churches
whom Saul was persecuting.
2. Christ speaks of the mutual knowledge, love, and sympathy
which unites the Shepherd and the sheep, creating a bond between
them of the closest and most endearing kind. " I know my sheep,
and am known of mine, as my Father knoweth me, and as I know the
Father." The mutual knowledge of the Shepherd and the sheep is
likened thus to the mutual knowledge of the Father and the Son.
The ground of the comparison cannot be in the omniscience pos-
sessed equally by the Father and the Son, in virtue of which each
fully knows the other, for no such faculty is possessed by the sheep ;
and yet their knowledge of the Shepherd is said to be the same in
kind with his knowledge of them, and both to be the same in kind
with the Father's knowledge of the Son and the Son's knowledge of
the Father. What possibly can be meant by this but that there is a
bond of acquaintanceship, affection, communion, fellowship, between
each true believer and his Saviour, such in its origin, such in its
strength, such in its sacredness, such in its present blessedness, such in
its glorious issues in eternity, that no earthly bond whatever — no, not
the closest that binds man to man, human heart to human heart — can
offer the fit or adequate symbol of it, to get which we must climb to
those mysterious heights, to that mysterious bond by which the
Father and the Son are united in the intimacies of eternal love?
This bond consists in oneness of life, unity of spirit, harmony of
desire and affection. In the spiritual world, great as the distances
may be which divide its members, (and vast indeed is that distance
at which any of us stand from our Redeemer,) like discerneth like
even afar off, like draws to like, like links itself to like, truth meets
truth, and love meets love, and holiness clings to holiness. The new-
born soul turns instinctively to him in whom it has found its better,
its eternal life. Known first of him, it knows him in return ; loved
first by him, it loves him in return. He comes to take up his abode
in it, and it hastens to take up its abode in him. He dwells in it ; it
THE GOOD SHEPHERD. 396
dwells in him And broken and imperfect as, on the believer's part,
this union and communion is, yet is there in it a nearness, a sacred-
ness, a tenderness that belongs to no other tie by which the human
spirit can be bound.
3. The manner in which the Good Shepherd leads his flock. " Be
calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out ; and when he
putteth forth his sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow
him." The language is borrowed from pastoral life in Eastern lands ;
and it is remarkable that in almost every point in which a resem-
blance is traced between the office and work of the shepherd and
that of Christ, the usages of Eastern differ from those of our West-
ern lands. Our shepherds drive their flocks before them ; and, in
driving, bring a strong compulsion of some kind to bear upon the
herd. This fashion of it puts all noticing, knowing, naming, calling
of particular sheep out of the question ; it is not an attraction from
before, it is a propulsion from behind, that sets our flocks of sheep
moving upon the way ; it is not the hearing of its name, it is not
the call of its master, it is not by the sight of him going on before
that any single sheep is induced to move onward in the path. It
is quite different in the East ; the Eastern shepherd goes before his
sheep he draws them after him — draws them by those ties of depen-
dence, and trust, and affection that long years of living together have
established between them. He calls them by their name ; they hear
and follow. Hence the language of the Old Testament : " The Lord is
my shepherd ; he leadeth me beside the still waters." " Thou leddest
thy people like a flock by the hand of Moses and of Aaron." " Give
ear, O Shepherd of Israel, thou that leadest Joseph like a flock " — a
usage this of Eastern shepherd life truly and beautifully illustrative
of the mode by which Jesus guides his people onward to the fold of
their eternal rest ; not by fear, not by force, not by compulsion of any
kind — no, but by love, by the attraction of his loving presence, the
force of his winning example. No guide or pastor he like those Phar-
isees whom Jesus had in his eye when, in contrast to them, he called
himself the Good Shepherd — men binding heavy burdens, and laying
them on other men's shoulders, while they would not touch them
themselves with one of their fingers. In our blessed Lord and Mas-
ter we have one who himself trod before us every step that he would
have us tread, bore every burden he would have us bear, met every
temptation he would have us meet, shared every grief he would have
us share, did every duty he would have us do. Study it aright, and
it will surprise you to discover over what a wide and varied field of
human experience the example of our Saviour stretches, how difficult
396 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
it is to find a position or experience of our common human life to
which you may not find something answering in the life of Jesus of
Nazareth.
L The consummating act of his love for the sheep, and the per-
fect voluntariness with which that act is done. "I am the Good
Sh jpherd : the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep." The
hireling undertakes to guard the sheep as best he can. It is expected
that he should be vigilant, alert, courageous in their defence, running
at times, if need be, some risk even of Umb or life. But no owner of
a flock ever bound it upon the shepherd whom he hired, as a condition
of his office, that if ever it came to be the alternative that the sheep
must perish, or the shepherd perish, the latter must give up his life
to save the flock. A human life is too precious a thing to be sac-
rificed in such a way. The owner of the flock would not give his own
life for the sheep : he could not righteously ask his hireling to do it.
The intrinsic difference in nature and in worth between the man and
the sheep is such as to preclude the idea of a voluntary surrender of
life by the one simply to preserve the other. How much in value above
all the lives for which it was given was that of God's own eternal Son,
we have no means of computing ; but we can see how far above all
sacrifice that either the owner of the flock acting himself as shepherd,
oi any under-shepherd whom he hired, ever made, or could be expected
to make, w T as that which Jesus made when he laid down his life for the.
sheep. Yet how freely was this done ! " I lay down my life that I
might take it again : no man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of
myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it
again." Life is that mysterious thing, the giving and restoring of
which the Creator keeps in his own hands. No skill or power of man
ever made a new living thing. No skill or power of man ever rekin-
dled the mystic light of life when once gone out. The power lies with
man to lay down or take away his own life ; but, once laid down, what
man is he that can take it up again? Yet Jesus speaks as one who
has the recovery of his own life as much at his command as the relin-
quishing of it — speaks of laying it down in order to take it again. He
would have it be known, that whatever he might permit the men to
do who had already resolved to take his life, his death would not be
their doing, but his own ; a death undergone spontaneously on his
part, of his own free and unconstrained choice. Most willingly,
through sheer love and pity, out of the infinite fulness of his divine
compassion, was he to lay down his life for the sheep, that thus they
might have life, and have it more abundantly than they otherwise
oould have —his death their life — his life from the dead drawing their
THE GOOD SHEPHERD. 397
finite and forfeited life up along with it and linking their eternity
with his own.
So we understand, and may attempt to illustrate this description
by himself of himself as the Good Shepherd ; but to the men who
first listened to it, especially to those Pharisees whose conduct aa
shepherds it was meant to expose, how absolutely unintelligible in
many of its parts must it have appeared! What an assumption in
making himself the one and only door, in raising himself so high
above all other shepherds, representing himself as possessed of
attributes that none of them possessed, making sacrifices that none
of them ever made ! If a shepherd gave his life for the sheep, one
would think that the sheep would lose instead of gain; would, in
consequence of his removal, be all the more at the mercy of the
destroyer. But here is a shepherd, whose death is held out as not
only protecting the sheep from death, but imparting to them a new
life; who dies, while yet by his dying, they lose nothing — do not
even lose him as their shepherd — for he no sooner dies than he lives
again to resume his shepherd's office. More than obscure — ambi-
tious, and utterly self-contradictory must this account of himself
have appeared to the listening Pharisees, their recoil not lessened
by Christ's dropping incidentally the hint that there were other
sheep, not of the Jewish fold, whom he meant to bring in, so that
there should be one fold, over which he should be the one shepherd.
"There was a division therefore again among the Jews for these
sayings." To many they appeared so presumptuous and inexpli-
cable, that they said, "He hath a devil, and is mad; why hear ye
him ?" There were others who, unable to give any explanation of
the sayings, yet clung to the evidence of his miracles, particularly of
the one they had just witnessed. "These are not the words of him
that hath a devil. Can a devil open the eyes of the blind?"
Leaving them to settle these differences among themselves, Jesus
withdrew; and for two months — from the time of the Feast of
Tabernacles to that of the Feast of the Dedication — the curtain
drops over Jerusalem, and we see and hear no more of any thing
said or done by Jesus there. Y/here and how were those two
months spent ? Many think that our Lord must have remained in
01 near the capital during this interval. It appears to us much more
likely that he had returned to Galilee. We are expressly told that
he would not walk in "Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him."
After the formal attempt of the rulers to arrest him, and after the
populace had taken up stones to stone him during the feast of taber-
nacles, it seems little likely that he would remain so long a time
398 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
within their reach and power. When next he appears in Solomon's
porch, and the Jews gather round him, the tone of the conversation
that ensues, in which there is so direct a reference to his declarations
about himself, uttered at the close of the preceding festival, is best
explained by our conceiving that this was a sudden reappearance of
Jesus in the midst of them, when the thoughts both of himself and
his hearers naturally reverted to the incidents of their last interview
in the temple. " Then came the Jews round about him, and said,
How long dost thou make us to doubt ? If thou be the Christ, tell
us plainly." There was not a little petulance, and a large mixture
of hypocrisy in the demand. These were not honest inquirers seek-
ing only relief from perplexing doubts. Whatever Christ might say
about himself, their minds about him were quite made up. They do
not come to ask about that late discourse of his in which he had
spoken so plainly about his being the one and only true shepherd of
the sheep. They do not come to inquire further about that door, by
which he had said that the true fold could alone be entered. They
come with the one distinct and abrupt demand, that he should tell
them plainly whether he was the Christ ; apparently implying some
readiness on their part to believe, but only such a readiness as the
men around the cross expressed when they exclaimed, "Let him
come down from the cross, and we will believe." They want him to
assert that he was the Christ. They want to get the evidence from
his own lips on which his condemnation by the Sanhedrim could be
grounded ; knowing besides that an express claim on his part to the
Messiahship would alienate many even among those whose incre-
dulity had been temporarily shaken.
There was singular wisdom in our Lord's reply: "I told you
before, and ye believed not." In no instance had he ever openly
declared to these Jews of Jerusalem that he was the Christ, nor
was he now about to affirm it, in the way that they prescribed.
Nevertheless it was quite true that he had often told them who and
what he was ; told enough to satisfy them that he must be either
their long-expected Messiah or a deceiver of the people. And
even if he had said nothing, his works had borne no ambiguous
testimony to his character and office. But they had not received,
they had rejected all that evidence. They wanted plain speaking,
and now they get it, get more of it than they expected or desired,
for Jesus not only broadly proclaims their unbelief, but reverting to
that unwelcome discourse which was still ringing in their troubled
ears, he tells them of the nature and the source of their unbelief:
"Ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto
THE GOOD SHEPHEKD. 399
you." Without dwelling, however, upon this painful topic, one
about which these Jews then, and we readers of the Gospel now,
might be disposed to put many questions, to which no satisfactory
answers from any quarter might come to us, Jesus goes on to dwell
upon what to him, as it should be to us, was a far more grateful
topic, the characteristics and the privileges of his own true and
faithful flock: "My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they
follow me." That and more he had previously said while speaking
of himself as the good shepherd, and noting some of the character-
istics of his sheep. But now he will add something more as to the
origin and nature, the steadfast and eternal endurance, of that new
relationship, into which, by becoming his, all the true members of
his spiritual flock are admitted.
"And I give unto them eternal life." Spiritual life, life in God,
to God, is the new fresh gift of Christ's everlasting love. To procure
and to impart it was the great object of his mission to our earth.
"I am come," he said, "that they might have life, and that they
might have it more abundantly." His incarnation was the man-
ifestation of this life in all its fulness in his own person. " The life
was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and show
unto you, that eternal life which was with the Father, and was
manifested unto us." "In him was life, and the life was the light
of men." The life not flowing from the light, but the light from the
life, even as our Lord himself hath said, "I am the light of the
world; he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall
have the light of life."
There are gifts of Christ's purchase and bestowment that he
makes over at once, and in a full completed form to the believer,
such as pardon of sin, acceptance with God, the title to the heavenly
inheritance. But the chief gift of his love — the life of faith, of love,
of meek endurance, of self-sacrificing service and suffering — comes
not to any of us now in such a form. It is but the germ of it that
is planted in the heart. Its history here is but that of the seed as it
lies in the damp, cold ear oh, as it rots and moulders beneath the
sod, waiting the sunshine and the shower, a large part of it cor-
rupting, decaying, that out of the very bosom of rottenness, out
of the very heart of death, the new life may spring. Could but an
intelligent consciousness descend with the seed into the earth,
and attend the different processes that go on there, we should
have an emblem of the too frequent consciousness that accom-
panies those first stages of the spiritual life, in which, amid doubts
and fears, surrounded by the besetting elements of darkness, weak-
£00 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ness, corruption, death, the soul struggles onward into the life ef &f-
lasting.
But weak as it is in itself, in its first beginnings, this spiritual life
partakes of the immortality, the immutability, of the source from
which it springs. It is this which bestows such preciousness on it.
Put into a man's hand the seed of a flower-bearing or fruit-bearing
plant, it is not the bare bulb he grasps he thanks you for. It would
have but little worth in his eyes were it to remain for ever in the
condition in which he gets it. It is the capacity for after growth,
the sure promise of the living flower and fruit that lies enwrapped
within, that gives it, all its value. Slowly but surely does the myste-
rious principle of life that lodges in it operate, till the flower expands
before the eye and the ripened fruit drops into the hand. So is it
with the seed of the divine life lodged by the Spirit in the soul; with
this difference, that for it there is to be no autumn season of decay
and death. It is to grow, and grow for ever, ever expanding, ever
strengthening, ever maturing; its perpetuity due to the infinite and
unchangeable grace and power of Him on whom it wholly hangs.
Strictly speaking, our natural life is as entirely dependent on God as
our spiritual one. But there is this great distinction between the
two: the one may run its course, too often does so, without any
abiding sense on the part of him who is passing through it of his
absolute and continued dependence on the great Lifegiver; the
other cannot do so. Its essence lies in the ever consciousness of its
origin, its continuance in the preservation of that consciousness.
You may try to solve the phenomena of life in its lower types and
forms, by imagining that a separate independent element or prin-
ciple is bestowed at first by the Creator, which is left afterwards,
apart from any connection with him, to develop its latent inherent
qualities. You cannot solve thus the life that is hidden with Christ
in God. Apart from him who gave it being, it has no vitality. It
begins in a sense of entire indebtedness to him ; it continues only so
long as that sense of indebtedness is sustained. It is not within
itself that the securities for its continuance are to be found.
" My sheep shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them
out of my hand. My Father which gave them me is greater than
all, and none shall pluck them out of my Father's hands." Are we
not entitled to gather from these words the comforting assurance
that all who by the secret communications of his grace have had
ttiis life transfused into their souls, shall be securely and eternally
upheld by the mighty power of Christ, so that they shall never
|>erish? not so upheld, whatever they afterwards may be or do, not
THE GOOD SHEPHERD. 401
so upheld that the thought of their security may slacken their own
diligence or tempt them to transgress, but so that the very sense of
their having such a presence and such a power as that of Jesus ever
with them to protect and bless, shall operate as a new spring and
impulse to all holy activities, and shall keep from ever becoming or
ever doing that whereby his friendship would be finally and for ever
forfeited and lost. Do we feel the first faint beatings of the new life
in our hearts? Do we fear that these may be so checked and
hardened as to be finally and for ever stopped ? Let us not think of
our weakness, but of Christ's strength ; of our faith, but of his faith-
fulness; of the firmness of our hold of him, but of the firmness of
his hold of us. The hollow of that hand of our Eedeemer is the
one safe place for us into which to put our sinful soul. Not into
the hand of the Father, as the great and holy lawgiver, would the
spirit in the first exercises of penitence and faith venture to thrust
itsolf, lest out of that hand it should indignantly be flung, and scat-
tered and lost should be the wealth of its immortality. It is into
th( hand of the Son, the Saviour, that it puts itself. Yet as soon as
ever it does so, the other hand, that of the Father, closes over it, as
if the redoubled might of Omnipotence waited and hastened to guard
the treasure. " Neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
. . . . No man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand."
The believer's life is hid "with Christ." Far up beyond all reach of
danger this of itself would place it. But farther still, it is hid " with
Christ in God." Does this not, as it were, double the distance, and
place the breath of two infinites between it and the possibility of
perishing ?
"I and my Father are one." It was on his saying so that they
took up stones again to stone him. He might have claimed to bo
Christ, but there had been nothing blasphemous in his doing so.
Many of the people — some even of the rulers — believed, or half
suspected that he was the Messiah; yet it never was imagined that
in setting forth such a claim Jesus was guilty of a crime for which
he might righteously be stoned to death. The Jews were not
expecting the divine being to appear as their Messiah. They were
looking only for one in human nature, of ordinary human parentage,
to come to be their king. It is not till he speaks of his hand being
of equal power with the Father's to protect — till he grounds that
equality of power upon unity of nature — till he says that he and the
Father are one — that they take up stones to stone him. And their
words explain their actions. While yet the stones are in their
hands, Jesus says to them, "Many good works have I showed you
Uf«or.«Hiat. 26
402 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
of my Father, for which of these works do ye stone me?" Reach
for the moment to concede any thing as to the character of his
works, they answer, "For a good work we stone thee not, but for
blasphemy, and because that thou being a man, makest thysel/
God." They understood him as asserting his divinity. Had they
misunderstood his words, how easy it had been for Christ to correct
their error — to tell them that he was no blasphemer as they thought
him; that in calling himself the Son of God he did not mean to
claim equality with the Father. He did not do so. He quotes,
indeed, in the first instance, a sentence from their own Scriptures, in
which their judges were called gods; but he proceeds immediately
thereafter to separate himself from, and to exalt himself above those
to whom because of their office, and because of the word of God
coming to them, the epithet was once or twice applied, and reasons
from the less to the greater. He says, "If he called them gods,
unto whom the word of God came, say ye of him whom the Father
hath sanctified and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because
I said, I am the Son of God?" At first there was some ambiguity
in the defence. Although intimating that the appellation might be
applied with more propriety to him than to any of their old judges,
it might be on the ground only of a higher office or higher mission
than theirs that Jesus was reasoning. They listen without inter*
rupting him. But when he adds — "If I do not the works of my
Father, believe me not. But if I do, though ye believe not me, yet
believe the works : that ye may know, and believe that the Father is
in me and I in him," they see that he is taking up the same ground
as at the first — is claiming to be equal with the Father — is making
himself God ; and so once again they seek to take him, to deal with
him as a blasphemer; but he escaped out of their hands. That
neither upon this nor upon any other occasion of the same kind did
our Lord complain of being condemned mistakenly when regarded
as being guilty of blasphemy, nor offer the explanation which at
once would have set aside the charge, we regard as the clearest of
all proofs that the Jews were not in error in interpreting his sayings
as they did.
We take then, our Lord's wonderful sayings at the feast of dedi-
cation as asserting the essential unity of nature and attribute*
between himself and the Father, and as thus assuring us of th*
perfect and everlasting security and well-being of all who put thei*
eouls for keeping into his hand.
OUTLINE STUDIES. 402a
OUTLINE STUDIES.
It is very difficult to arrange the events in the life of Christ at this
time in chronological order. The view taken by Dr. Hanna that
Christ returned to Galilee just preceding the first period of the Peraean
Ministry is favored by strong writers and appears best fitted to meet
the situation.
When our Lord's last journey from Galilee to Jerusalem began,
he entered northeastern Samaria; but not being received by the
people of a certain village, it is thought that he went back into Galilean
territory and then eastward into Peraea. It is apparently the only
province clearly open to him, and as the time has come when his Mes-
sianic character is to be proclaimed, he sends out seventy of his dis-
ciples into every place whither he himself is about to come. When
they return from their mission, Christ's final word for them is that
they should rejoice that their names are written in heaven.
If there is a similarity in the features attending the ministry in
Peraea to the early stages of that in Galilee, it is probably due to the
fact that the circumstances were alike. But there are other particulars
in which there is a sharp distinction. Christ's prevision and pre-
diction of the rapidly approaching and tragic end are now distinct and
outspoken. His cures, as the two upon the Sabbath, are wrought
upon his own free movement, and not upon application or appeal.
This period of the Persean Ministry is marked especially by
parables, there being not less than ten of them, and several are among
the most expressive, beautiful, and fruitful of Christ's whole ministry,
as the Lost Sheep, the Lost Piece of Money, the Prodigal Son, Dives
and Lazarus, the Pharisee and the Publican, and the Good Samaritan.
As compared with the earlier parables, spoken during the Galilean
Ministry, which were largely parables of the kingdom, the parables
given during the Peraean Ministry are chiefly parables of grace, though
some, like that of Dives and Lazarus, by contrast are parables of judg-
ment. Grace has been defined as mercy, kindness, love, that one
does not deserve. Viewed in this light, the parable of the Prodigal Son
is supreme among the parables of grace. With what graciousness
and charm also is the parable of the Good Samaritan irradiated! It
has inspired innumerable deeds of compassion, sympathy, and humanity.
Very fittingly such parables as these are found in this Penvan section
of Luke, for this soulful Greek helper of Paul and beloved physician
seems instinctively to have found that which possesses spiritual nobility
and winsomeness, and to have incorporated such material in his Gospel.
Again in this special time may be noticed the Lord's prayer, as
given in response to the words, " Lord, teach us to pray."
402& THE LIFE OF CHRIST
PART III. MAIN MINISTRY IN JUDEA AND PER^A.
Study 13. First Period of Per^ean Ministry.
(1) Christ's closing visit to Galilee 403, 404
a. Small visible results of his work 403
b. Christ has not met popular expectation 403
c. His adversaries take advantage of his lessening fame 403
d. His disciples rise to true faith in him 404
e. On both sides the time for closing action has come 404
(2) Christ's last journey to Jerusalem 405-407
a. His messengers find the Samaritans hostile 404
b. He rebukes the indignant disciples who would call down fire from
heaven 405, 406
c. Words for the hasty, boastful, depressed, reluctant 406, 407
d. Another route chosen 407
e. Christ prepares to declare his mission 407
(3) The sending out of the seventy 407-411
a. Publicity insured for the Messianic proclamation 408
b. Comparison of the two commissions 408, 409
c. Joyful return of the seventy 409, 410
d. True cause for joy 410
(4) Per^ean period and its record in Luke 411-417
a. Events occurring between the Feast of Tabernacles and the Passover. 411
b. Details supplied by St. Luke and St. John 412
c. Jesus avoids Jewry 413, 414
d. Conjectural route in Peraea 414, 415
e. Resemblance to the work in Galilee 415, 416
/. Jesus sends a message to Herod 416, 417
g. Peculiar tone noticeable in the Peraean periods 416-420
(5) Features of this Perjean work 418-420
a. Sabbath day cures 418, 419
b. Christ foretells his coming experiences at Jerusalem 419
c. He warns of his appearance for judgment 419, 420
d. He declares that the kingdom of God is within 420
(6) Parables spoken in Peraea 421-439
a. Ten parables named , 421
b. Christ declines to judge in a property dispute 421, 422
c. An example of non-intervention 423
d. He warns against covetousness 424
e. The barren fig-tree prophecy and fulfillment 424-426
/. Parable of the Great Supper 426, 427
g. Three parables of Grace 427-429
h. Parables of Unjust Steward and Unjust Judge 429-431
i. Parable of the Good Samaritan 431-439
(7) The Lord's Prayer 439-447
a. The request, " Lord, teach us to pray " 439
b. Features of the prayer Christ gave 440-445
c. Prayer to be made to the Father 446, 447
LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM. 10i
VIM.
NC1DENTS IN OUR Lord's LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM.*
interval between the feast of tabernacles and the feast of dedication
that Christ's last visit to Galilee was paid — his farewell taken of the
home of his youth — the scenes of his chief labors. Those labors
had lasted for about two years, and in them an almost ceaseless
activity had been displayed. He had made many circuits through
all the towns and villages of the district, performed innumerable
miracles, and delivered innumerable addresses to larger or smaller
audiences. Yet the visible results had not been great. He had
attached twelve men to him as his constant and devoted attendants.
There were four or five hundred more ready to acknowledge them-
selves as his disciples. A vast excitement and a large measure of
public sympathy had at first been awakened. Multitudes were ready
to hail him as the great expected deliverer. But as the months rolled
on, and there was nothing in his character or teaching or doings,
answering to their ideas of what this deliverer was to be and do,
they got incredulous — their incredulity fanned into strength by a
growing party headed by the chief Pharisees, who openly rejected
and reviled him. There had not been much in his earlier instruc-
tions to which exception could be taken, but when he began at a
later period to speak of himself as the bread of life, and to declare
that unless men ate his flesh and drank his blood they had no life
in them, his favor with the populace declined, and they were even
ready to believe all that his enemies insinuated, as to his being
a profane man — an enemy to Moses and to their old laws. Not
a few were still ready to regard him as a prophet, perhaps the
forerunner of the Messiah; but outside the small circle of his imme-
diate attendants there were few if any who recognised him as the
Christ of God. Of this decline in favor with the multitude his
adversaries greedily availed themselves, and Galilee was fast becom-
ing as dangerous a home for him as Judea. Meanwhile his own
disciples had been slowly awakening from their first low and earthly
notions of him — their eyes slowly opened to the recognition of the
great mystery of his character, as being no other than the incarnate
Son of God. Till they were lifted up above their old Jewish notions
of the Messiah — till they came to perceive how singular was the
» Luke 9 : 51-6? • 10 : 1-24.
404 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
relationship in which Jesus stood to the Father, how purely spiritual
were the ends which he came to accomplish — he did not, could not,
intelligibly speak to them of his approaching death, resurrection,
and ascension. The confession of Peter in the name of all the rest
that he was the Christ, the Son of God, marked at once the arrival
of the period at which Jesus began so to speak, and the close of his
labors in Galilee. On both sides, on the part alike of friends and
enemies, things were ripening for the great termination, the time
had come ''that he should be received up," and "he steadfastly set
his face to go up to Jerusalem."
Starting from Capernaum and travelling southward by the route
on the west side of the Jordan, he sends messengers before his face,
who enter a village of the Samaritans. We remember how gladly
he had been welcomed two years before in one town of that district,
how ready the inhabitants of Sychar had been to hail him as the
Messiah, and we may wonder that now the people of a Samaritan
village should so resist his entrance and reject his claims. It may
have been that they were men of a different spirit from that of the
Sycharites. But it may also have arisen from this — that the Samar-
itans at first had hoped that if he were indeed the Messiah, he
would decide in favor of their temple and its worship, but that now s
when they see him going up publicly to the feasts at Jerusalem, and
sanctioning by his presence the ordinances of the sanctuary there,
their feelings had changed from those of friendliness into those of
hostility. However it was, the men of this village — the first Samar-
itan one that lay in the Lord's path — "would not receive him,
because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem." Some
marked expressions of their unfriendliness had been given, some
open indignities flung upon his messengers, of which James and
John were witnesses. These two disciples had been lately with their
Master on the Mount of Transfiguration, and had seen there the
homage that the great prophet Elijah had rendered to him. They
were now in the very region of Elijah's life and labors. They had
crossed the head of the great plain, at one end of which stood
Jezreel, and at the other the heights of Carmel. The events of the
last few weeks had been filling their minds with vague yet un-
bounded hopes. Their Master had thrown off much of his reserve,
had shown them his glory on the mount, had spoken to them as he
had never done before, had told them of the strange things that
were to happen at Jerusalem, had made them feel by the very man-
ner* of his entrance upon this last journey from Galilee, that the
crisis of his history was drawing on. He courts secrecy no longer,
Going up to Jerusali
LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM. 405
He sends messengers before his face. He is about to make a public
triumphant entry into Jerusalem. Yet here are Samaritans who
openly despise him — will not give him even a night's lodging in
their village. The fervid attachment to Jesus that beats in the
hearts of James and John kindles into indignation at this treatment.
Their indignation turns into vengeful feeling towards the men who
were guilty of such conduct. They look around. The heights of
Carmel remind them what Elias had done to the false prophets, and
fancying that they were fired with the same spirit, and had a still
weightier wrong to avenge, they turn to Jesus, saying, "Lord, wilt
thou that we command fire to come down from heaven and consume
them, even as Elias did?" They expect Jesus to enter fully and
approvingly into the sentiment by which they are animated; they
know it springs from love to him; they are so confident that their3
is a pure and holy zeal, that they never doubt that the fire from
heaven waits to be its minister ; they want only to get permission to
use the bolts of heavenly vengeance that they believe are at their
command. How surprised they must have been when Jesus turned
and rebuked them, saying, " Ye know not what manner of spirit ye
are of; for the Son of Man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to
save them."
Jesus is not now here for any personal insult to be offered — any
personal injury to be inflicted ; but still he stands represented, as he
himself has taught us, in the persons of all his little ones, in the
body of his church, the company of the faithful. Among these little
ones within that company, how many have there been, how many
are there still who cherish the spirit of James and John? who as
much need our Lord's rebuke, and who would be as much surprised
at that rebuke being given ? There is no one thicker cloak beneath
which human passions hide themselves, than that of religious zeal —
zeal for Christ's truth, Christ's cause, Christ's kingdom. Once let a
man believe, (a belief for which he may have much good reason, for
it is not spurious but real zeal that we are now speaking of,) once let
a man believe that a true and ardent attachment to Christ, a true
and ardent zeal to promote the honor of his name, the interests of
his kingdom, glows within him, and it is perfectly astonishing to
what extent the consciousness of this may delude him — shut his eye
from seeing, his heart from feeling — that, under the specious guise
of such love and zeal, he is harboring and indulging some of the
meanest and darkest passions of our nature — wounded pride, irrita
tion at opposition, combativeness, the sheer love of fighting, of hav-
ing an adversary of some kind to grapple with and overcome
40fi THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
personal hatred, the deep thirst to be avenged. These and such
Like passions, did they not in the days gone by rankle in the breasts
of persecutors and controversialists? of men who claimed to be
animated in all they said and did by a supreme regard to the honor
of their Heavenly Master ? These and such like passions, do they
not rankle still in the hearts of many, now that the hand of the
persecutor has to so great an extent been tied up, and the pen of the
controversialist restrained — prompting still the uncharitable judg-
ment, the spiteful remark, the harsh and cruel treatment ? Christ's
holy character and noble cause may have insults offered, deep
injuries done to them ; but let us be assured that it is not by getting
angry at those who are guilty of such conduct, not by maligning
their character, not by the visitation of pains and penalties of any
kind upon them, that these insults and injuries are to be avenged;
no, but by forbearance and gentleness, and love and pity — by feeling
and acting towards all such men as our blessed Lord and Master
felt and acted towards the inhabitants of that Samaritan village.
Perhaps it was the gentle but firm manner in which Jesus
rebuked the proposal of the two disciples — telling them how igno-
rant they were of the true state of their own hearts — that led the
Evangelist to introduce here the narrative of those cases in which
our Lord dealt with other moods and tempers of the human spirit
which produce often the same self-ignorance, and too often seriously
interfere with a faithful following of Christ. One man comes — a
type of the hasty, the impetuous, the inconsiderate — and, volunteer-
ing discipleship, he proclaims, "Lord, I will follow whithersoever
thou goest." Boastful, self-ignorant, self-confident, he has not
stopped to think what following of Jesus means, or whither it will
carry him — unprepared for the difficulties and trials of that disciple-
ship which he is in such haste to take on. The quieting reply,
" Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of
man hath not where to lay his head," sends him back to reflect
somewhat more intelligently and deeply on what his offer and
promise imply. Another is asked by Christ himself to follow him ;
but he says, " Suffer me first to go and bury my father :" a type of
the depressed, the melancholic — of those whom the very griefs and
sorrows of this life and the sad duties to which these call them stand
as a barrier between them and the services, the sacrifices, the com-
forts and consolations of the faith. Such need to be taught that
there is a duty above that of self-indulgence in any human grief;
and so to this man the Lord's peremptory reply is, "Let the dead
bury their dead, but go thou and preach the kingdom of God." A
LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM. 407
third man asks, that before obeying the Saviour's call, he might be
allowed first to go and bid his friends and relatives farewell : a very
natural request — one in which we should imagine there was little
that was wrong; but the searcher of all hearts sees that there is a
hankering here after the old familiar way of living — a reluctance of
some kind in some degree to take the new yoke on; and so the
warning is conveyed to him in the words, "No man having put his
hand to the plough and looking back is fit for the kingdom of God."
So varied was the spirit in which men approached Jesus, in whom
some readiness to follow him appeared, so varied was the manner in
which our Lord dealt with such, suiting himself to each particular
case with a nicety of adjustment of which in our ignorance we are
but imperfect judges, but enabling us to gather from the whole that
it is a deliberate, a cheerful, an entire and unconditional surrender of
the heart and life that Jesus asks from all who would be truly and
for ever his.
Eejected by the Samaritans, Jesus turned to another village and
chose another route to Jerusalem, in all likelihood the well-known
and most frequented one leading through Persea, on the east side of
the Jordan. In prosecuting this journey, he "appointed other
seventy also, and sent them two and two before his face into every
city and place whither he himself would come." Our Lord had
gathered around him in passing from Capernaum to Samaria almost
the entire body of his Galilean discipleship. It could scarcely fur-
nish more men than were sent forth on this important mission.
Every available disciple of suitable age and character was enlisted in
the service. It can scarcely be imagined that they were employed
for no other purpose than to provide suitable accommodation before-
hand for their Master. Theirs was a higher and far more important
errand. For the wisest reasons Jesus had hitherto avoided any publk
proclamation of his Messiahship. He had left it to his words and
deeds to tell the people who and what he was. He had not long
before this time, charged his apostles " that they should tell no man
that he was Jesus the Christ." Matt. 16:20. But the time had
come for his throwing aside this reserve — for seeking rather than
shunning publicity — for letting all men know, not only that the king-
dom had come, but that he, the head of that kingdom, the Christ,
die Son of David, the king of Israel, was in the midst of them.
Before his depar^re from among them, the Israelitish nation was
to have this proclaimed through all its borders. This was to be tho
peculiar distinction of his last journeyings towards the Holy City —
th^t all. Ang upon their course his Messianic character should !hj
408 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
publicly proclaimed, that so a last opportunity for receiving on
rejecting hini might be afforded. And how could this have been
better effected than by the mission of the seventy? By the advance
of so many men two by two before him, the greatest publicity must
have been given to all his movements. In every place and city the
roice of his forerunners would summon forth the people to be wait-
iug his approach. The deputies themselves could scarcely fail to
feel how urgent and important the duty was which was committed to
their hands. Summoning them around him before he sent them forth,
Jesus addressed to them instructions almost identical with those
addressed to the twelve at the time of their inauguration as his
apostles. The address to the twelve, as reported by St. Matthew,
(chap. 10,) was longer, bore more of the character of an induction to
a permanent office, carried in it allusions to duties to be done, perse-
cutions to be endured, promises to be fulfilled, in times that were to
follow the removal of the Lord; but so far as that first short mission
of the twelve and this mission of the seventy were concerned, the
instructions were almost literally the same. Both were to go forth
in the same character, vested with the same powers to discharge the
same office in the same way ; to the rejecters and despisers of both
the same guilt was attached, and upon them the. same woes were
denounced. We notice, indeed, these slight differences : that the pro-
hibition laid upon the twelve not to go into the way of the Gentiles,
nor into any city of the Samaritans, is now withdrawn, and that the
gift of miraculous power is seemingly more limited as committed tc
the seventy, being restricted nominally to the healing of the sick. But
fchese scarcely affect the question when comparison is made between
the commissions given to the tw T elve and to the seventy, as employed
respectively on the two temporary missions on which Jesus sent
them forth. The result of that comparison is, that no real distinc-
tion of any importance can be drawn between the two. Does this
not serve, when duly weighed, to stamp with far greater significance
than is ordinarily attached to it the mission of the seventy — raising
it to the same platform with that of the apostles? It is quite true
that the apostles w r ere to be apostles for life, and the seventy were
to have no permanent standing or office of any kind in the church.
But it was equally true that in their distinctively apostolic character
and office the twelve w T ere to have — indeed, could have no successors.
If, then, the commissions and the directions given to them are to be
taken as guides to those who were afterwards to hold office in the
ehurch, the commission and directions given to the seven uy may
equally bo regarded as given for the guidance of the membership of
^
LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM. 409
the church at large; this, the great, the abiding lesson that their
employment by Jesus carries with it — that it is not to ministers or
ordained officers of the church alone that the duty pertains of
spreading abroad among those around them the knowledge of Christ
To the whole church of the living God, to each individual member
thereof, the great commission comes, " Go thou and make the
Saviour known." As the Father sent him, Jesus sends all who own
and love him on the same errand of mercy. Originally the church
of Christ was one large company of missionaries of the cross, each
member feeling that to him a portion — differing it may be largely
both in kind and sphere from that assigned to others, but still a por-
tion — of the great task of evangelizing the world was committed;
and it will be just in proportion as the community of the faithful,
through all its parts, in all its members, comes to recognise this to
be its function, and attempts to execute it, that the expansive power
that once belonged to it will return to it again ; and not so much by
organized societies or the work of paid deputies, as by the living
power of individual pity, sympathy, and love, spirit after spirit will
be drawn into the fold of our Redeemer, and his kingdom be en-
larged upon the earth.
Where the seventy went, into what places and cities they entered,
how they were received, what spiritual good was effected by them,
all this is hidden from our view. The sole brief record of the result
of their labors is what is told us about their return. They came
back rejoicing. One thing especially had struck them, and of this
only they make mention — that, though they had not been told of
it beforehand, the very devils had been subject unto them through
their Master's name. They were pleased, perhaps somewhat proud,
that what nine of the Lord's own apostles had failed in doing they
had done. Jesus tells them that his eye had been on them in their
progress — that he had seen what they could not see — how the
powers of the invisible world had been moved, and Satan had fallen
as lightning from heaven. He tells them that it was no temporary
poAver this with which they had been invested — that instead of be-
ing diminished it would afterwards be enlarged till it covered and
brought beneath its sway all the power of the enemy. But there
was a warning he had to give them. He saw that their minds and
hearts were too much occupied by the mere exercise of power — by
La most striking and tangible results of the exercise of that power.
Knowing how faithless an index what is done by any agent is of
what that agent himself is, of his real worth and value in the sight
of God, he checks so far their joy by saying, "Notwithstanding, iu
HO THE LIFE OF OHEIST.
this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather
rejoice because your names are written in heaven." There is a book
of remembrance in the heavens, the Lamb's book of life, in which
the names of all his true and faithful followers are written. It may
be a great thing to have one's name inscribed in large, enduring
'etters in the roll of those who have done great things for Christ and
for Christ's cause upon this earth ; but that earthly register does not
correspond with the one that is kept above. There are names to be
found in the one that will not be met with in the other. There are
names which shine bright in the one that appear but faintly lumi-
nous in the other. There are names that have never been entered in
the one that beam forth with a heavenly brilliance in the other.
The time comes when over the one the waters of oblivion shall pass,
and its records be all wiped away. The time shall never come when
the names that shall at last be found written in the other shall be
blotted out.
The joy of the disciples had an impure earthly element in it
which needed correction. No such element was in the joy which the
intelligence that the seventy brought with them kindled in the
Saviour's breast. He was the man of sorrows; a load of inward
unearthly grief lay heavy on his heart. But out of that very grief—
the grief that he endured for the sinful world he came to save — there
broke a joy — the purest, the subliniest, the most blissful — that felt
by him when he saw that the great ends of his mission were being
accomplished, and that the things belonging to their eternal peace
were being revealed to the souls of men. "In that hour Jesus
rejoiced in spirit, and said, I thank thee, Father, Lord of heaven
and earth, that thou hast hid these things from the wise and pru-
dent, and hast revealed thorn unto babes. Even so, Father, for so it
seemed good in thy sight." Once before Jesus had offered up the
same thanksgiving, in the same words, to the Father. We sought
then to enter a little into its meaning.* Now from the very repeti-
tion of it let us learn how fixed the order is, and how grateful we
should be that it is so — that it is to the simple, the humble, the
teachable, the childlike in heart and spirit, that the blessed revela-
tion cometh.
Blessed we have called it, taking the epithet from Christ's own
lips ; for after he had offered up that thanksgiving to his Father, he
turned to his disciples and said to them privately, "Blessed are the
eyes which see the things that you see: for I tell you that many
prophets and kings have desired to see those things which ye see,
* See "Ministry in Galilee," p. 235 seq.
OUR LORD'S MINISTRY IN PER^A. 411
and have not seen them, and to hear those things which ye hear>
and have not heard them."
One closing remark upon the position in the spiritual kingdom
here tacitly assumed or openly claimed by Christ. He prefaced his
instructions to the seventy by saying, "The harvest truly is greatj
but the laborers are few : pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest
that he would send forth laborers into his harvest." Who was the
Lord of the harvest, to whom these prayers of his disciples were to
be addressed ? Does he not tell them when he himself immediately
thereafter proceeds to send forth some laborers, instructing them
how the work in the great harvest field was to bo carried on?
Parting from Galilee he casts a lingering glance behind upon its
towns and villages — Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum. Who
shall explain to us wherein the exceeding privileges of these cities
consisted, and wherein their exceeding guilt ? Who shall vindicate
the sentence that Jesus passed, the woes that he denounced upon
them, if he was not the Son of God, into whose hands the judgment
of the earth hath been committed? "I beheld," said Jesus, "Satan
as lightning fall from heaven." Was the vision a true one? If
so, what kind of eye was it that saw it? "All things are delivered
to me of my Father ; and no man knoweth who the Son is but the
Father, and who the Father is but the Son, and he to whom the Son
will reveal him." With what approach to truth or to propriety
could language like this be used by any human, any created being?
So is it continually here and there along the track of his earthly
sojourn, the hidden glory bursts through the veil that covers it, and
in the full majesty of the all-knowing, all-seeing, all-judging, all-
directing One — Jesus of Nazareth presents himself to the eye of
faith.
IX.
Our Lord's Ministry in Per^a,*
The feast of tabernacles, at which St. John tells us that Jesus
was present, was held in the end of October. The succeeding pass-
over, at which our Lord was crucified, occurred in the beginning
of April. Between the two there intervened five months. Had we
depended alone upon the information given us by the first two Evan-
gelists, we should have knoAvn nothing of what happened in this
* Luke 9 : 51 to Luke 18 : 16.
412 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
interval beyond the fact that, when his ministry in Galilee was over,
Christ went up to Jerusalem to die there. They tell us of two 01
three incidents which occurred at the close of this last journey, but
leave us altogether in the dark as to any preceding visit to Jerusalem
or journeyings and labors in any other districts of the land. True
to his particular object of giving us the details of Christ's ministry
in Judea, St. John enables us so far to fill up this blank as to insert *
1. The appearance at the feast of tabernacles; 2. The appearance
at the feast of dedication, held in the latter end of December; 3. A
retirement immediately after the feast to Persea, the region beyond
the Jordan; 4. A summons back to Bethany upon the occasion of
the death of Lazarus ; 5. A retreat to " a country near to the wilder-
ness, into a city called Ephraim;" and 6. A coming up to Bethany
and Jerusalem six days before the Passover. These cover, however,
but a small portion of the five months. At the first of the two
feasts Jesus was not more than four or five, at the second, not more
than eight days in Jerusalem. His stay at Bethany, when he came
to raise Lazarus from the dead, was cut short by the conspiracy to
put him to death. Not more than a fortnight out of the five months
is thus accounted for as having been passed in Jerusalem and its
neighborhood. Where then was spent the remaining portion of the
time? The gospel of St. Luke and it alone enables us to answer
these questions. There is a large section of this gospel — from the
close of the 9th to near the middle of the 18th chapter — which is
occupied with this period, and which stands by itself, having noth-
ing parallel to it in any other of the Evangelists. This section com-
mences with the words, "And it came to pass, when the time was
come that he should be received up, he steadfastly set his face to go
to Jerusalem, and sent messengers before his face : and they went
and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him. '
Luke 9 : 51, 52. St. Matthew describes what is obviously the same
event — our Lord's farewell to Galilee — in these words: "And it came
to pass, that when Jesus had finished these sayings, he departed from
Galilee, and came into the coasts of Judea beyond Jordan." Matt.
19:1. And similarly St. Mark, of the same movement, says, "And
he arose from thence, and cometh into the coasts of Judea by the
farther side of Jordan." Mark 10 : 1. In the same chapters, and but
a few verses after those in which these announcements are made,
both St. Matthew and St. Mark relate the incident of little children
having been brought to Jesus. But in the gospel of St. Luke, the
record of this incident, instead of following so closely upon the
notice of the departure from Galilee, does not come in till the close
OUR LORD'S MINISTRY IN PERiEA. 413
of the entire section already alluded to — so many as eight chapters
intervening. From that point the three narratives become again
coincident, and run on together. We have thus so much as a third
part of the entire narrative of St. Luke, and that continuous— to
which, so far as the sequence of the story goes, there is nothiuj?
that corresponds in any of the other gospels.
In this part of St. Luke's gospel there are so few notices of time
and place, that had we it alone before us, our natural conclusion
would be that it described continuously the different stages of one
long journey from Galilee up through Peraea to Jerusalem. Taking
it, however, in connection with the information supplied to us by St.
John, we become convinced that it includes all the journeyings to and
fro which took place between the time when Jesus finally left Galilee
to the time when he was approaching Jericho, on going up to his last
passover. But how are we to distribute the narrative so as to make
its different parts fit in with the different visits to Jerusalem and its
neighborhood related by St. John? Our first idea here would be to
start with identifying the final departure from Galilee, described by
St. Luke, with the going up to the feast of tabernacles, as related by
St. John. Looking, however, somewhat more closely at the two nar-
ratives, we are persuaded that they do not refer to the same journey.
In the one, public messengers were sent before Christ's face to pro
claim and prepare for his approach ; in the other, he went up, " not
openly, but, as it were, in secret." The one was slow, prolonged by
a large circuit through many towns and villages ; the other was rapid —
Jesus waited behind till all his brethren and friends had departed,
and then suddenly appeared at Jerusalem in the midst of the feast
Did Jesus then return to Galilee immediately after the feast of the
tabernacles, and was it in the course of the two months that elapsed
between the two festivals that the first part of the journey described
by St. Luke was undertaken ; or was it not till after the feast of dedi-
cation that the last visit to Galilee and the final departure from it
look place? The absolute silence of St. John as to any such return
to Galilee, and the unbroken continuity of his account of what hap-
pened at the two feasts, seem to militate against the former of these
suppositions. We- remember, however, that such silence is not
peculiar to this case — that there is a similar instance of a visit paid
to Galilee between the time of the occurrences, reported respectively
in the fifth and sixth chapters of St. John's gospel, of which not the
slightest trace is to be discovered there. We remember that if Jesus
did remain in Judea between the feasts, it must have been in conceal-
ment, for we are told of this very period, that he would not walk in
4U THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Jewry because the Jews sought to kill him. John 7 : 1. We remember
that St. John speaks of his going to Persea after the feast of dedica-
tion is if it were one following upon another that had recently pre-
ceded it, "He went away again beyond Jordan." John 10:40. We
reflect besides that if it were not till the beginning of January that
the journey from Galilee commenced, there would be but little room
for all the occurrences detailed in these eight chapters of St. Luke's
gospel; and we accept it as being much the more likely thing that
Jesus did retire from Judea to Galilee instantly after the close of the
feast of tabernacles, and it was then that the series of incidents com-
menced, the sole record of which is preserved to us by the third evan-
gelist. This, of course, implies that we break down the portion of his
narrative devoted to the journeys to Jerusalem into portions corre-
sponding with the interval between the two festivals, and those between
ihe latter of these and the visit to Bethany. This might plausibly
enough be done by fixing upon what appears to be something like
one break in the narrative, occurring at chap. 13 : 22, and something
like another at chap. 17:11. Without resting much upon this, let us
(distribute its parts as we may) take the whole account contained in
these eight chapters of St. Luke, as descriptive of a period of our
Lord's life and ministry which otherwise would have been an utter
blank, as telling us what happened away both from Galilee and
Judea during the five months that immediately preceded the cruci-
fixion.
Evidently the chief scene or theatre of our Lord's labors through-
out the period was in the region east of the Jordan. Departing from
Capernaum — turned aside by the inhabitants of the Samaritan vil-
lage — he passed along the borders of Galilee and Samaria, crossed
the Jordan at the ford of Bethshean, entering the southern part of
the populous Decapolis, passing by Jabesh-Gilead, penetrating inward
perhaps as far as Jerash, whose wonderful ruins attest its wealth and
splendor; then turning southward towards Jerusalem, crossing the
Jabbok, pausing at Mahanaim, where Jacob had his long night-
struggle ; climbing or skirting those heights and forests of Gilead to
which, when driven from Jerusalem by an ungrateful son, David
retreated, and which now was furnishing a like refuge to the Son and
Lord of David in a similar but still sadder extremity. Much of this
country must have been new to Jesus. He may once or twice have
taken the ordinary route along the eastern bank of the Jordan, but
it is not at all likely that he had ever before gone so deep into or
passed so leisurely through this district. Certainly he had never
visited it in the same style or manner. He came among this new
OUR LORD'S MINISTRY IN PER^EA. 415
population with all the prestige of his great Galilean name. Ho
came sending messengers before his face — in all likelihood the seventy
expending their brief but ardent activities upon this virgin soil. He
came as he had come at first to the Galileans, at the opening of his
ministry, among whom many of the notices of what occurred here
strikingly remind us, for we are distinctly told when he came into the
" coasts beyond Jordan he went through the cities and villages," and
"great multitudes followed him, and he healed them," and "the
people resorted to him, and gathered thick together ; and as he was
wont, he taught them." " And when there were gathered together
an innumerable multitude of people, insomuch that they trode one
upon another, he began to say unto his disciples." Luke 13:22;
Matt. 19:2; Mark 10:1; Luke 11:29, 42; 12:1. Here we have all
the excitements, and the gatherings, and the manifold healings which
attended the earlier part of the ministry in Galilee. The two com-
munities were similarly situated, each remote from metropolitan influ-
ence, more open to new ideas and influences than the residents in
Jerusalem. The instrumentality brought to bear upon them in the
presence of Jesus and his disciples, in the proclamation of the advent
of the kingdom, in the working of all manner of cures upon the dis-
eased among them was the same. Are we surprised at it, that so
many of the very scenes enacted at first in Galilee should be enacted
over again in Persea, and that, exactly similar occasions having arisen,
the same discourses should be repeated? that once more we should
hear the same accusation brought against Jesus when he cast out
devils that he did so by Beelzebub, and that against this accusation
we should hear from his lips the same defence? (Matt. 12: 24; Mark
3 : 22 ; Luke 11 : 14 ;) that once more, as frequently before, there
should be a seeking of some sign from heaven, and a telling again
the evil generation that so sought after it that no sign but that of
Jonas the prophet should be given? that once more, when asked by
the disciples to teach them to pray, the Lord should have repeated
the prayer he had recited in the Sermon on the Mount ? that upon
another and equally suitable occasion, about half of that sermon
should now be re-delivered? that we should have in this period two
cases of healing on the Sabbath, exciting the same hostility, that hos-
tility in turn rebuked by the employment of the same arguments and
illustrations? These and other resemblances are not surprising, and
yet it is the very discernment of them which has perplexed many so
much, that (in direct opposition to the expressed purpose of the
gospel as announced in its opening sentence) they have been tempted
to think that, in violation of all chronological order, St. Luke h.vs
416 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
imported into what seems to be an account of what occurred after the
departure from Galilee many of the incidents and discourses of the
preceding ministry in Galilee. Instead, however, of our being per-
plexed at finding these resemblances or coincidences, knowing as wo
lo otherwise, that it was the practice of our Saviour to reiterate (it
is likely very often) the mightiest of his sayings, they are such as W9
should have expected when once we come to understand precisely
ihe peculiarities of this brief Peraean ministry. But while these
coincidences as £o events, and repetitions as to discourses, do occur,
there occur along with them, mixed up inseparably with them, many
things both in the spirit and actions of Christ appropriate exclusively
to this particular epoch of his life. No allusions to the time or man-
ner of his own death, no reference to his departure and return,
no pressing upon his disciples of the great duty of waiting and watch-
ing for his second advent, no prophecies of the approaching overturn
of the Jewish economy, came from the lips of Jesus during his sojourn
in Galilee. It was not till the time of his transfiguration that he
began to speak of such matters privately to his disciples, and even
then it was with bated breath. But now all the reasons for reserve
are nearly, if not entirely gone. Jesus has set his face to go up to
Jerusalem to die. He waits and works only a little longer in this
remote region beyond Jordan, till the set time has come. Nothing
that he can say or do here can have much effect in hastening or
retarding the day of his decease.* He may give free expression to
those thoughts and sentiments which, now that it is drawing near,
must be gathering often around the great event. And he may also
safely draw aside, at least partially, the veil which hides the future,
concealing at once the awful doom impending over Jerusalem, and
his own speedy return to judge the nation that had rejected him.
And this is what we now find him doing. Herod, under whose juris-
diction he still was in Persea. had got alarmed. Fearing the people
too much, having burden enough to bear from the beheading of the
Baptist, he had no real intention to stretch out his hand to slay
Jesus ; but it annoyed him to find this new excitement breaking out
in another part of his territories, and he got some willing emissaries
among the Pharisees to go to Jesus, and to say, as if from private
information, "Get thee out, and depart hence, for Herod will kill
thee." And Jesus said, "Go ye and tell that fox" — who thinks so
cunningly by working upon my fears to get rid of me before my time —
*■ Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to-day and to-morrow, and
the third day I shall be perfected. Nevertheless, I must walk to-day,
and to-morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet
OUR LORD'S MINISTRY IN PER.1A. 117
perish out of Jerusalem. Jerusalem, Jerusalem ! which killest the
prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would
I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her
brood under her wings, and ye would not! Behold your house is left
unto you desolate : and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me,
until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in
the name of the Lord." I have quoted especially these words, the
most memorable of which were repeated afterwards, as they present
a very accurate reflection of the peculiar mood of our Lord's mind,
and the peculiar tone and texture of his ministry at this period.
First, There was a shortness, a decisiveness, a strength of utter-
ance in the message sent to Herod, which belongs to all Christ's say-
ings of this period, whether addressed to friends or foes. His instruc-
tions, counsels, warnings to his own disciples, he expressed in the
briefest, most emphatic terms. Was he speaking to them of faith,
he said, "If ye had faith as a grain of mustard-seed, ye might say unto
this sycamine-tree, Be thou plucked up by the root, and be thou
planted in the sea, and it should obey you." Was he inculcating
humility, he said, " Which of you having a servant ploughing or feed-
ing cattle will say unto him by-and-by, when he is come from the
field, Go and sit down to meat? and will not rather say unto him,
Make ready wherewith I may sup, and gird thyself, and serve me, till
I have eaten and drunken, and afterward thou shalt eat and drink?
Doth he thank that servant because he did the things that were com -
manded him ? I trow not. So likewise ye, when ye shall have done
all these things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable
servants, we have done that which was our duty to do." Was he warn-
ing them against covetousness, he did it in the story of the rich man
who, as he was making all his plans about throwing down his barns
and building greater ones, had the words addressed to him, " Thou fool,
this night Ihy soul shall be required of thee; then whose shall those
things be which thou hast provided? " Was he inculcating the neces-
sity of self denial, an entire surrender of the heart and life to him, he
did it by turning to the multitude that followed him, and saying, "If
any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he
cannot be my disciple. And whosoever doth not bear his cross,
and come after me, cannot be my disciple. Whosoever he be of you
that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple."*
« Luke 14 : 26, 27, 33 compared with Matthew 10 : 37, 38. "He that loveth father or
mother more than me is not worthy of me. And he that loveth son or daughter more
than me is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not his cross and followeth after me
i« not worthy of me."
UU of OUil»t 27
418 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
There was curtness even in our Lord's dealings with those who,
influenced with no hostilo feeling, came to him with needless and
impertinent inquiries. " Master," said one of the company, " speak
to my brother that he may divide the inheritance with me. And he
said, Man, who made me a judge or a divider over you?" "There
were present some that told him of the Galileans whose blood Pilate
had mingled with their sacrifices." It was not enough to tell them
that they were wrong if they imagined that these men were sinners
above all the Galileans because they suffered such things. They
must have it also there told to them, " I say unto you, Except ye
repent, ye shall all likewise perish." Marked especially by the same
feature was our Lord's treatment of his enemies, the Pharisees.
Their hostility to him had now reached its height. "They began to
urge him vehemently, and to provoke him to speak of many things;
laying wait for him and seeking to catch something out of his mouth,
that they might accuse him," and " as they heard all these things
they derided him." Luke 11:53, 54; 16:14. He gave them indeed
good reason to be provoked. One of them invited him to dinner, and
he went in and sat down to meat. The custom, whether expressed
or not, that he had not first washed before dinner, gave Jesus the fit
opportunity, and in terms very different from any he had employed
in Galilee, he denounced the whole body to which his host belonged,
"Now do ye Pharisees make clean the outside of the cup and the
platter; but your inward part is full of ravening and wickedness. Ye
fools ! Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye are
as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not
aware of them." The first notes thus sounded of that terrible denun-
ciation that rung through the courts of the temple as our Lord turned
to take his last farewell of them and of his enemies.
Corresponding with this manner of speaking was our Lord's man-
ner of action at this time. The three conspicuous miracles of this
period were the two Sabbath cures and the healing of the ten lepers.
Like all the others of the same class, the two former were spontane-
ous on Christ's part, wrought by him of his own free movement, and
not upon any application or appeal. In a synagogue one Sabbath
day he saw a woman that for eighteen years had been bowed togeth-
er, and could in no way lift herself up. And when he saw her, " he
said unto the woman, Thou art loosed from thine infirmity, and he
laid his hands on her, and immediately she was made straight and
glorified God." Invited on another Sabbath-day to sup with one of
the chief Pharisees, as he entered he saw before him a man which
had the dropsy, brought there perhaps on purpose to see what he
W:*feUttluA
''Behold, I Stand at the Door and Knock !''
OUR LORD'S MINISTRY IN PER^A. 419
would do. Turning to the assembled guests, Jesus put a single ques-
tion to them, more direct than any he had put in Galilee. " Is it
lawful to heal on the Sabbath-day?" They said nothing, and he
" took the man and healed him, and let him go." Entering into a
certain village, he saw before him ten lepers, who stood afar off, and
lifted up their voices and said, "Jesus, Master, have mercy on us."
He said to them as soon as he saw them, " Go, show yourselves unto
the priests." ' You have what you ask ; you are cured already. Go,
do what the cured are required by your law to do.' A few words are
spoken at a distance, and all the men are at once healed. Is there
not a quick promptitude displayed in all these cases, as if the actor
had no words or time to spare ?
But, secondly, our Lord's thoughts were fixed much at this time
upon the future — his own future and that of those around him. His
chief work of teaching and healing was over. True, he was teaching
and healing still, but it was by the way. All was done as by one
that was on a journey — who had a great goal before him, upon which
his eye was intently fixed. With singular minuteness of perspective,
the dark close of his own earthly existence now rose up before him.
"Behold," he said at its close, "we go up to Jerusalem, and all
things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of Man
shall be accomplished. For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles,
and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on : and
they shall scourge him, and put him to death." Luke 18 : 31-33. "I
have a baptism to be baptized with," he said at the beginning of the
period, "and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!" Luke
12 : 50. " And the third day he shall rise again." But beyond the
days, whether of his own death or of his resurrection, that other day
of his second coming now for the first time is spoken of. He is press-
ing upon his disciples the great duty of taking no undue thought for
the future — using the same terms and employing the same images as
he had in the Sermon on the Mount; but he goes now a step farther
than he had done then, closing all by saying, "Let your loins be
girded about, and your lights burning; and ye yourselves like unto
men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding;
that, when he cometh and knocketh, they may open unto him immedi-
ately. Blessed are those servants, whom the lord, when he cometh,
shall find watching. . . . Be ye therefore ready also: for the Son of
man cometh at an hour when ye think not." Luke 12: 35, 36, 37, -40.
Still in darkness as to the true nature of the kingdom of God, irri-
tated, it may have been, that after the announcement that it had
come so little should bu said about it, so Lew tokens of its presence
420 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
should appear, the Pharisees demanded of him when the kingdom of
God should come. He told them that they were looking for it in an
altogether wrong direction. " The kingdom of God," he said, " comeih
not with observation ; neither shall they say, Lo here ! or Lo there I
for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you" — for them, for us, foi
all men, one of the most important lessons that ever could be taught —
that God's true spiritual kingdom is in nothing outward, but lies in
the inward state and condition of the soul. Nevertheless, there was
to be much outward and visible enough, much connected with that
kingdom and his own lordship over it, of which these Pharisees were
little dreaming, and which was destined to break upon them and upon
their children with all the terror of a terrible surprise. This was in
his thoughts when, after having corrected the error of the Pharisees
as to the nature of the kingdom, he turned to his disciples and said
to them, " The days will come when ye shall desire to see one of the
days of the Son of man, and ye shall not see it. And they shall say
to you, See here ! or, See there ! go not after them, nor follow
them; for as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under
heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven, so shall also the
Son of man be in his day. But first must he suffer many things, and
Ire rejected of this generation. And as it was in the days of Noah, so
shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. Likewise also as ii
was in the days of Lot. . . . thus shall it be in the day when the Son
of man is revealed" — our Lord enlarging upon this topic till in what
he said upon this occasion you have the first rough sketch of that
grand and awful picture presented in his last discourse to the apostles
upon the ridge of Mount Olivet, preserved in Matt. 24.
That section of our Lord's life and labors, of which a short sketch
has been presented, has been greatly overlooked — thrown, in fact,
into the distance and obscurity which hangs over the region in which
it was enacted. A careful study will guide to the conviction that in
it Christ occupied a position intermediate between the one assumed
in Galilee and the one taken up by him at Jerusalem in the days that
immediately preceded his crucifixion.
THE PARABLES OF THE PEE^IAN MINISTRY. 421
The Parables of the Per^ean Ministry.
Dcjking that ministry in Peraea whose course and character we
have traced, our Lord delivered not fewer than ten parables-— as
many within these five months as in the two preceding years — a third
of all that have been recorded as coming from his lips. The simple
recital of them will satisfy you how fertile in this respect this period
was, while a few rapid glances at the occasions which suggested
some of them, and at their general drift and meaning, may help to
confirm the representation already given of the peculiar features by
which that stage in our Lord's life stands marked. We have before
us here the parables of the Good Samaritan, the Kich Fool, the Bar-
ren Fig-tree, the Great Supper, the Lost Sheep, the Lost Piece of
Money, the Prodigal Son, the Provident Steward, Dives and Lazarus,
the Unjust Judge, the, Pharisee and the Publican.
The first of these was given as an answer to the question, " Who
is my neighbor ?" arid, as inculcating the lesson of a broad and unsec-
tarian charity, might, with almost equal propriety, have been spoken
at any time in the course of our Lord's ministry. It gives, however, an
additional point and force to the leading incident of the story, when we
think of it as delivered a few days after our Lord himself had received
such treatment at the hands of the Samaritans as might have re-
strained him — had he not been himself the great example of the
charity he inculcated — from making a Samaritan the hero of the tale.
The second sprung from an application made to Jesus, the man-
ner of whose treatment merits our particular regard. One of two
brothers, both of whom appear to have been present on the occa-
sion, said to him, " Master, speak to my brother that he divide the
inheritance with me." A request not likely to have been made till
Christ's fairness and fearlessness, in recoil from all falsehood and
injustice, had been openly manifested and generally recognized- -a
request, however, grounded upon a total misconception of the nature
and objects of his ministry. The dispute that had taken place
between the two brothers was one for the law of the country to settle.
For Christ to have interfered in such a case — to have pronounced
any judgment on either side, would have been tantamount to an
assumption on his part of the office of the civil magistrate. This
Jesus promptly and peremptorily refused. " Man," said he, " who
made Die a judge over you?" More than once was Christ tempted
422 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to enter upon the proper and peculiar province of the judge. More
than once were certain difficult legal and political cases and ques-
tions submitted to him for decision; but he always, in the most mark
ed and decisive manner, refused to entertain them. With the exist
ing government and institutions of the country, with the ordinary
administration of its laws, he never did and never would interfere.
You can lay your hand upon no one law, upon no one practice,
having reference purely to man's temporal estate, which had the
sanction of the public authorities, that Jesus condemned or refused
to comply with. No doubt there was great tyranny being practised,
there were unjust laws, iniquitous institutions in operation, but he did
not take it upon him to expose, much less to resist them. For the
guidance of men in all the different relations in which they can be
placed to one another he announced and expounded the great and
broad, eternal and immutable, principles of justice and of mercy.
But with the application of these principles to particular cases he
did not intermeddle. He carefully and deliberately avoided such
intermeddling. It is possible indeed that the demand made upon
him in the instance now before us, may not have been for any author-
itative decision upon a matter that fell properly to be determined by
the legal tribunals. Had the claim been one that could be made
good at law, it is not so likely that Jesus would have been appealed
to in the matter. The object of the petitioner may simply have been
to get Christ to act as an umpire or arbitrator in a dispute which the
letter of the law might have regulated in one way, and the principle
of equity in another. But neither in that character would Jesus
interfere. "Man, who made me a divider over you ? " He would not
mix himself up with this or any other family dispute about property.
Willing as he was to earn for himself the blessedness of the peace-
maker, he was not prepared to try and earn it in this way. It was
no part of his office, as head of that great spiritual kingdom which
he came to establish upon the earth, to act as arbitrator between such
conflicting claims as these two brothers might present. To set up
the kingdom of righteousness and peace and love in both their
hearts — that was his office. Let that be done ; then, without either
lawsuit or arbitration, the brothers could settle the matter between
themselves. But so long as that was not done — so long as either one
or both of these brothers was acting in the pure spirit of selfish-
ness — there was no proper room or opportunity for Jesus to interfere ;
nor would interposition, even if he had ventured on it, have realized
any of those ends which his great mission to our earth was intended
to accomplish.
THE PARABLES OF THE PERJ3AN MINISTRY. 423
The example of non-intervention thus given by Christ, rightlj
interpreted, has a wide range. It applies to disputes between kings
and subjects, masters and servants, employers and employed. These
in the form that they ordinarily assume, it is not the office of Jesus
to determine. That he who rules over men should be just, ruling in
the fear of the Lord; that we should obey them that rule over us,
living a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty — this
he proclaims, but he does not determine what just ruling is, nor
what the limits of obedience are, nor how, in any case of conflict,
the right adjustment is to be made between the prerogatives of th@
crown and the liberties of the subject; and if ever discord should
arise between oppressive rulers and exacting subjects who, with
equal pride, equal selfishness, equal ambition, try the one to keep
and the other to grasp as much power as possible, in such a struggle
Christianity, if true to her own spirit and to her Founder's example,
stands aloof, refusing to take either side.
"Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal."
Such is the rule that Christianity lays down; but what exactly, in
any particular case, would be the just and equal thing to do — what
would be the proper wages for the master to offer and the servant
to receive — she leaves that to be adjusted between masters and
servants, according to the varying circumstances by which the wages
of all kinds of labor must be regulated. It has been made a ques-
tion whether, in our great manufacturing cities, capital gives to labor
its fair share of the profits. One can conceive that question raised
by the employed as against their employers, in the spirit of a purely
selfish and aggressive discontent ; and that, so raised, it might
provoke and lead on to open collision between the two. Here, again,
in a struggle, originating thus, and carried on in such a spirit, Chris-
tianity refuses to take a part. She would that employers should b@
more liberal, more humane, more tenderly considerate, not only of
the wants, but of the feelings of those by the labor of whose hands?
it is that their wealth is created. She would that the employed
should be less selfish, less envious, less irritable — more contented.
It is not by a clashing of opposing interests, but by a rivalry of jnst
and generous sentiments on either side, that she would keep the
balance even — the only way of doing so productive of lasting good.
After correcting the error into which the applicant to him had
fallen — as though the settlement of legal questions, or family dis-
putes about the division of estates, lay within his province — Jesua
took advantage of the opportunity to expose and rebuke the principle
which probably actuated both brothers, the one to withhold and the
4:24 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
other to demand. Turning to the general audience by ^nich he wa*
surrounded, he said, " Take heed and beware of covetousness." The
word here rendered " covetousness" is a peculiar and very expressive
one; it means the spirit of greed — that ever-restless, ever-craving,
ever-unsatisfied spirit, which, whatever a man has, is ever wanting
more, and the more he gets still thirsts for more. A passion which
has a strange history; often of honest enough birth — the child of
forethought, but changing its character rapidly with its growth — get-
ting prematurely blind — losing sight of the end in the means — till
wealth is loved and sought and grasped and hoarded, not for the
advantages it confers, the enjoyment it purchases, but simply for
itself— to gratify that lust of possession which has seized upon the
soul, and makes it all its own. It was to warn against the entrance
and spread and power of this passion that Jesus spake a parable
unto them, saying, " The ground of a certain rich man brought forth
plentifully : and he thought within himself, saying, What shall I do,
because I have no room where to bestow my fruits? And he said,
This will I dc I will pull down my barns, and build greater; and
there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods. And I will say to
my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years ; take
thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. But God said unto him, Thou
fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee ; then whose shall
those things be which thou hast provided? So is he that layeth up
treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God."
Beyond the circumstance already noted, that the request which
suggested it was one more appropriate to a late than to an early period
of our Lord's ministry, we have nothing in the parable, any more
than in that of the Good Samaritan, which specially connects it with
the ministry in Porsea. It is different with the two that come next in
order — that of the Barren Fig-tree and of the Great Supper.
Some who were present once told Jesus of those Galileans whose
blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices. He told them, in
reply, of the eighteen upon whom the tower in Siloam fell, repeating,
as he did so, the warning, "Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise
perish." We miss the full force of the prophetic knell thus sounded
in their ears, in consequence of the word "likewise" being often used
by us as equivalent to "also," or " as well." The intimation, as given
by Jesus, was that they would perish in the same manner. The work
done by the Koman sword, the deaths caused by a single falling
tower, were brought before the mind of Jesus; and instantly he
thinks of the wider sweep of that sword, and the falling of all the
towers and battlements of Jerusalem ; and when that terrible calamity
THE PARABLES OF THE PER^AN MINISTRY. 425
(of which we have here the first obscure hint or prophecy that came
from the lips of Jesus) descended upon the Jewish people, then to
the very letter were his words fulfilled, as thousands fell beneath the
stroke of the Roman sabres — slain, as the Galileans were, in the
midst of their passover sacrifices — and multitudes were crushed to
death beneath the falling ruins of their beloved Jerusalem. None
but Christ himself, none of those who listened for the first time to
these warning words, could tell to what they pointed. Forty years
were to intervene before the impending doom came to be executed
upon the devoted city. No sign or token of its approach was visible.
Those around him, some of whom were to witness and to share in the
calamity, were living in security, not knowing how rapidly the period
of forbearance was running out, not knowing that the time then
present was but for them a season of respite. It was to indicate how
false that feeling of security was, to give them the true key to the
Lord's present dealings with them as a people, that Jesus told them
of a fig-tree planted in a vineyard, to which for three successive
years the owner of the vineyard had come seeking fruit and finding
none ; turning to the dresser of the vineyard, and saying, " Gut it
down, why cumbereth it the ground?" And the dresser of the vine-
yard said to him, " Lord, let it alone this year also, till I dig about it,
and dung it: and if it bear fruit, well; and if not, then after that
thou shalt cut it down." And there, at the point of the respite
sought and granted, the action of the parable ceases Did the year
of grace go by in vain? Was all the fresh labor of £io dresser fruit-
less? Was the tree at last cut down? All aboui this the parable
leaves' untold. It had been the image of the end, as it crossed the
Saviour's thoughts, that had suggested the parable; but the time
had not yet come for his going farther in the history of the tree than
the telling that its last year of trial had arrived, and that if it
remained fruitless it was to be cut down. The story of the tree was,
in fact, a prophetic allegory, meant to represent the state and pros-
pects of the Jewish people, for whom so much had been done in the
years that were past, and so much more in the year then present :
the story stopping abruptly at the very stage which was then being
described — not without an ominous foreshadowing of the dark doom
in reserve for impenitent Israel — the Israel that refused to benefit
by all the care and the toil that Jesus had lavished on it. It is, of
tourse, not only easy, but altogether legitimate and beneficial, for the
broader purposes of Christian teaching, to detach this parable from
its primary connections and its immediate objects; but, as it ever
should be the first aim in reading any of our Lord's sayings to under-
rM THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
stand their significance as at first uttered, in this instance we are left
in no doubt or uncertainty that it was the generation of the Jews
then living, then upon probation, then in the last stage of their trial—
that the fig-tree of the parable, in the first instance, was intended to
represent. Kegarded so, how singularly appropriate to the time of
its delivery, in its form and structure, does the parable appear! It
is the first of a series of allegorical prophecies, in which the whole
after-history of the people and age, to which Jesus may be said to
have himself belonged, stands portrayed. Never before had any hint
of the outward or historical issues of his advent, so far as the gene-
ration which rejected him was concerned, dropped from the lips of
Jesus. Such allusion, we may say with reverence, would have been
mistimed had it been made earlier. It was suitable that the great
trial upon which his mission to them put that generation should 1 >e
somewhat advanced, be drawing near its close, before the judicial
visitations, consequent upon its treatment of the Messiah, should 1 >c
declared. And here, in the narrative of St. Luke, the prophetic
announcement meets us, as made for the first time after our Lords
labors in Galilee are over, and he is waiting to go up to Jerusalem to
be crucified; and, as the first hint of the kind given, it is, as was fit-
ting, brief and limited in its range, throwing a clear beam of light
upon the time then present, leaving the future enveloped with a
threatening gloom.
The same things are true of the parable that comes next in order
in the pages of St. Luke. It carries the story of the future a little
farther on; but it, too, stops abruptly. A great supper is made, to
which many had been invited. The servant is sent out to say to
them that were bidden, "Come, for all things are now ready." With
one consent, but giving different reasons, they all excuse themselves.
The servants are sent out first to the streets and lanes of the city,
then to the highways and hedges, to bring others in, that the table
may be filled. The narrative closes with the emphatic utterance of
the giver of the feast — " For I say unto you, that none of these men
that were bidden shall taste of my supper." Here, in the first invited
guests, we at once recognize the Jews, or rather that section of them
which stood represented by their lawyers and Pharisees, among
whom Jesus was at the time sitting. They had had the invitation long
in their hands, and professed to have accepted it; but when the time
came, and the call came from the lips of Jesus to enter the kingdom,
to partake of the prepared supper, they all, with one consent, had
made excuse. And they were to reap this as the fruit of their doing
so — that the poor, the lame, the halt, the blind, the wanderers of the
THE PAEABLES OF THE PERSIAN MINISTRY. 427
highways and hedges, were to be brought in, and they were to be
excluded. Of this result the parable gives a clear enough fore-
shadowing; but it does not actually reveal the issue. It stops with
the second mission of the servants and the declaration of a fixed
purpose on the part of the giver of the entertainment: but it does
not describe the supper itself, nor tell how the last errand of the
servant prospered, nor how the fixed resolution of the master of the
house to exclude was carried out. Over these it leaves the same
obscurity hanging, that in the preceding parable was left hanging
over the cutting down of the tree. There is a step taken in advance.
Beyond the rejection of the Jews, we have the gathering in of the
Gentiles in their stead alluded to, but obviously the main purpose of
the parable as indicated by the point at which it stops and the last
speech of the master of the house, which is left sounding in our ears,
is to proclaim that those who had rejected the first invitation that
Christ had brought should, in their turn, be themselves rejected of
him. Here, then, we have another parable fitting in with the former,
and in common with it perfectly harmonizing with that particulai
epoch at which St. Luke represents it as having been delivered.
The parable of the Great Supper was spoken at table, in the house
of a chief Pharisee, in the midst of a company of Pharisees and law-
yers, Soon afterwards, Jesus appears to us in the centre of a very
different circle. "Then drew near unto him all the publicans and
sinners to hear him." Jesus welcomed them with joy, devoted him-
self with the readiest zeal to their instruction. The Pharisees who
were present were offended at what they had noted or had been told
about the familiarity of his intercourse with these publicans and sin-
ners ; his acceptance of their invitations ; his permitting them to use
freedom even with his person. "And they murmured, saying, This
man receiveth sinners and eateth with them." The Pharisees in
Galilee had done the same thing ; and that St. Luke, in the fifteenth
chapter, is not referring to the same incident that St. Matthew, in his
ninth chapter, has recorded, but is relating what happened over
again in Peraea, just as it had occurred before in Galilee, is evident
from this, that he himself, in his fifth chapter, records the previous
Galilean incident. In answer to the first murmurings that broke out
against him for companying with publicans and sinners, Jesus had
contented himself with saying, "They that be whole need not a
physician, but they which are sick. I came not to call the righteous,
but sinners to repentance." Now, however, he makes a longer
apology and defence. He will let these muvmurers know what it is
in the condition of these publicans and sinners which has drawn him
i28 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
to tliein and fixed on them his regard — why and for what it is that
he has attached himself so closely to them — even to bring them to
repentance, win them back to God. He will draw aside for a moment
the veil that hides the invisible world, and let it be seen what is
thought elsewhere, among the angels of God, of that ready reception
}f sinners on his part which has evoked such aversion. Christ does
this in three parables — that of the Lost Sheep, the Lost Piece of
Money, and the Lost Son. Taken together, these three parables
compose our Lord's reply to the censure passed upon his conduct by
the Pharisees, and they do so by presenting at once the whole history
of that recovery from their lost condition, which it was Christ's great
object to see realized in those with whom he associated, and the
effect of such recovery as contemplated by those who, not themselves
feeling their need of it, looked askance upon the whole procedure by
which it was realized ; for just as clearly as the history of the loss
and the recovery of the one sheep, and the one piece of money, and
the one son, were intended to represent that conversion to God which
it was the main aim of Christ's converse with the publicans and sin-
ners to effect, just as clearly do the ninety-nine sheep, and the nine
pieces of money, and the elder brother, stand as representatives of
these murmuring scribes and Pharisees — those just persons, just in
their own eyes, who needed no repentance — thought they did not
need it, and who, not understanding the nature or the necessity of the
work of conversion in others, condemned the Saviour when engaged
in this work. There is a difference, indeed, in the three parables, so
far as they bear upon their character and conduct. The ninety and
nine sheep and the nine pieces of money, being either inanimate or
u intelligent, afforded no fit opportunity of a symbolic exhibition of
the temper and disposition of the Pharisees. This opportunity was
afforded in the third parable, and is there largely taken advantage of.
The elder brother — the type or emblem of those against whom Jesus
is defending himself — is there brought prominently out upon the
stage : a full revelation of his distrustful, spiteful, envious spirit is
made. If thirteen verses are given to the story of the younger
brother, the prodigal son, no fewer than eight are given to that of the
elder brother. The thirteen verses too, it is to be remembered, cover
the incidents of years ; the eight, those of a single evening. Naturally
and properly, the deeper, livelier, more universal interest that attach-
es to the story of the younger overshadows that of the elder brother —
so deeply, indeed, that we think and speak of the parable as that of
the Prodigal Son ; but as originally spoken, and for the purposes
originally contemplated, the part played by the elder brother had
THE PARABLES OF THE PERyEAN MINISTRY. 429
much more importance assigned to it than we now are disposed to
give it. He is out in the field when his younger brother is so gladly
welcomed and has the fatted calf killed to celebrate his recovery.
Returning in the evening, he hears the sounds of the music and the
dancing within the happy dwelling. He calls one of the servants,
ami hears from him what has happened. And now all the fountains
of selfishness and pride, and envy and malignity, pour out their bitter
waters. He sulkily refuses to go in. His father comes out and
remonstrates with him. But he will listen to no entreaty. He for-
gets for the moment all his family relationships. He will not call his
parent father ; he will not speak to him as to one to whom he had
been indebted — rather he will charge him with injustice and unkind-
ness; he will not call the once lost, but now found one his brother —
"this thy son" is the way that he speaks of him. Notwithstanding
all his unfilial, unbrotherly, contemptuous arrogance, how kindly,
how patiently is he dealt with ; how mildly is the father's vindication
made; how gently is the rebuke administered! Did it soften him,
subdue him ? did he, too, come to see how unworthy he was to be
the son of such a father ? melted into penitence, did he too, at last
throw himself into his father's arms, and in him was another lost one
found ? Just as in the parable of the Barren Fig-tree and the Great
Supper, the curtain drops as the scene should come upon the stage
in which the final fortunes of those of whom we take the elder broth-
er as the type should have been disclosed. And in so closing, this
parable goes far to proclaim its birth-time as belonging to the period
when Jesus was just beginning to lift the veil which hung over the
shrouded future of impenitent and unbelieving Israel.
The next parable, that of the Unjust Steward, was addressed par-
ticularly, and we may say, exclusively, to the disciples. It contains
no note of time by which the date of its delivery might be determined.
"We are struck, however, with finding that throughout the period now
before us, it was as servants waiting and watching for the return of
their master, as stewards to whom their absent lord has committed
the care of his household during a temporary departure, that the
apostles and disciples were generally addressed. And even as the
woes impending over doomed Israel were now filling the Saviour's
eye, the first pre-intimation of them breaking forth from his lips, even
so does the condition of the mother church at Jerusalem, in the
dreary years of persecution that preceded the destruction of Jerusa-
lem, seem to have lain at this time heavy upon his heart. It was
with reference to the sorrows and trials that his servants should in
that interval endure, and to the wrongs inflicted on them, that the
430 THE LIFE OF CHEIST
parable of the Unjust Judge was spoken. Its capital lesson was
importunity in prayer, but the prayer that was to go up sc often, and
was at last to be heard, was prayer from the persecuted while suffer-
ing beneath the lash. This parable, therefore, like so many of its
immediate predecessors, exactly fits the season at which St. Luke
reports it as having been spoken.
Were it not for the interest which attaches to the question wheth-
er or not the chapters of St. Luke's gospel, from the ninth to the
eighteenth, present us with a true, and faithful, and orderly narrative
of a period in our Lord's life of which no other of the evangelists tell
us anything, I should not have dwelt so long upon this topic. I
shall have gained the end I had in view, however, if I have brought
distinctly out to view the &Ye months that elapsed after Christ's fare-
well to Galilee, as spent, for the most part, in the regions beyond the
Jordan, as occupied with a ministry bearing evident tokens of a
transition period, in which with his face set steadfastly towards the
great decease he was to accomplish at Jerusalem, our Lord's thoughts
were much occupied with the future — the future which concerned
himself, his followers, the nation. The events, the miracles, the
parables of the period, are all in harmony; and as a whole we may
safely say, that they carry in their bosom internal evidence of their
having been rightly located by St. Luke, unsuitable as they would
have been either for any preceding or any posterior section of our
Lord's life. It is but attributing to Christ our humanity in true and
perfect form to imagine that the ending of his labors in Galilee and
Judea, and the near prospect of his death, threw him into an atti-
tude of thought and feeling congenial to the circumstances in which
he was placed. It was natural that the unseen and the future should
at this time absorb the seen and the present. It may be a fancy, but
I have thought, while reading again and again the ten parables
which belong to this period, that far more frequently and more
vividly than ever before in his ministry is the invisible world laid
bare. The spirit summoned that night into the immediate presence
of its judge — the angels rejoicing over each repentant returning sin-
ner — the bosom of Abraham upon which Lazarus is represented as
reposing — the hell into which the soul of the rich man in dying
sinks — where in any of the preceding addresses or parables of our
Lord have we the same unfolding of the world that lies beyond the
grave ? Is it not as one who is himself holding closer fellowship with
shat world into which he is so soon himself to enter that Jesus
speaks? One thing is not a fancy, that more frequently and more
urgently than ever before does Jesus press upon his disciples the
THE GOOD SAMARITAN. 431
duty of holding such fellowship. By the story of the friend at mid-
night awakened by the continued and repeated solicitations of his
neighbor, by that of the unjust judge moved to redress her wrongs
by the simple importunity of the widow, by that of the prayer of the
poor publican heard at once and answered, by the appeal to theii
own generosity as fathers in the treatment of their children, did Jesus
at this time seek to draw his disciples to the throne of grace, and
keep them there, praying on in the assurance that earnest, renewed,
repeated petitions offered in sincerity and faith shall never go up to
God in vain. And who is he that encourages us thus to pray — that
gives us the assurance that our prayers will be answered? Is he not
our own great and gracious Advocate, who takes our imperfect peti-
tions as they spring from our defiled lips, our divided and sinful
hearts, and turns them into his own all-powerful, all-prevailing plead-
ings as he presents them to the Father ?
XI.
The Good Samaritan.*
"Behold, a certain lawyer stood up" — in all likelihood within
some synagogue upon a Sabbath-day. In rising to put a question to
Jesus, he was guilty of no impertinent intrusion. Jesus had assumed
the office of a public teacher, and it was by questions put and an-
swered that this office was ordinarily discharged. This lawyer " stood
up and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eter-
nal life?" His object might have been to perplex and entangle — to
involve Christ in a difficulty from which he perceived or hoped that
he would be unable to extricate himself. Questions of this kind were
often put to Jesus, their very character and construction betraying
their intent. But the question of the lawyer is not one of this nature.
Something more than a mere idle curiosity, or a desire to test the
extent of Christ's capacity or knowledge, appears to have prompted
it. It is not presented in the bare abstract form. It is not, " Master,
what should be done that eternal life be inherited?" but, "Master,
what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" It looks as if it came from
one feeling a true, deep, and personal interest in the inquiry.
The manner in which our Lord entertained it confirms this im-
pression. Questions of many kinds from many quarters were address-
o Luke 10:25-29.
4:32 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ed to Jesus. With one or two memorable exceptions, the}' were an
answered, but in different ways; whenever any insidious and sinister
purpose lay concealed beneath apparent homage, the answer was
always such as to show that the latent guile lay open as day to his
eye. But there is nothing of that description here. In the first
instance, indeed, he will make the questioner go as far as he can in
answering his own question. He will tempt — that is, try or prove him
in turn. Knowing that he is a scribe well instructed in the law, he
will throw him back upon his own knowledge. Before saying any-
thing about eternal life, or the manner of its inheritance, Jesus saj^s,
"What is written in the law? how readest thou?" It is altogether
remarkable that in answer to a question so very general as this — one
which admitted of such various replies — this man should at once have
laid his hand upon two texts, standing far apart from each other —
the first occurring early in Deuteronomy, the second far on in Levit-
icus — texts having no connection with each other in the outer form
or letter of the law, to which no peculiar or pre-eminent position is
there assigned, which are nowhere brought into juxtaposition, nor are
quoted as if, when brought together, they formed a summary or com-
pound of the whole ; the two very texts, in fact, which, on an after
occasion, in answer to another scribe, our Lord himself cited as the
two upon which all the law and the prophets hung. The man who,
overlooking the whole mass of ceremonial or ritualistic ordinances as
being of altogether inferior consideration, not once to be taken into
account when the question was one as to a man's inheriting eternal
life, who so readily and so confidently selected these two command-
ments as containing the sum and substance of the whole, gave good
proof how true his reading of the law was. "And Jesus said to him,
Thou hast answered right : this do, and thou shalt live." ' Take bui
thine own right reading of the law, fulfil aright those two great pre-
cepts, Love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, Love thy neigh-
bor as thyself, and thou shalt live ; live in loving and in serving, or if
thou readiest not in this way the life thou aimest at, thou wilt at
least, by the very failure, be taught to look away from the precepts
to the promises, and so be led to the true source and fountain
of eternal life in the free grace of the Father through me the Son.'
Trying to escape from the awkward position of one out of whose
own lips so simple and satisfactory a reply to his own question had
been extracted — desiring to justify himself for still appearing as a
questioner, by showing that there was yet something about which
there remained a doubt — he said to Jesus, "And who is my neigh-
bor?" We may fairly assume that one so well read as this man was
THE GOOD SAMARITAN. 433
as to the true meaning of the law, was equally well read as to the
popular belief and practice regarding it. He knew what interpreta-
tion was popularly put on the expression, " thy neighbor/' which
stood embodied in the practice of his countrymen. He knew with'
what supercilious contempt they looked down upon the whole Gentile
world around them — calling them the " uncircumcised," the " dogs,"
the " polluted," the " unclean," — with what a double contempt they
regarded the Samaritans living by their side. He knew that it was
no part of the popular belief to regard a Samaritan as a neighbor.
So far from this, the Jew would have no dealings with him, cursed
him publicly in his synagogue, would not receive his testimony in a
court of justice, prayed that he might have no portion in the resur-
rection. He knew all this — had himself been brought up to the
belief and practice. But he was not satisfied with it. Along with
that fine instinct of the understanding which had enabled him to
extract the pure and simple essence out of the great body of the
Jewish code, there was that finer instinct of the heart which taught
him that it was within too narrow bounds that the love to our
neighbor had been limited. He saw and felt that these bounds
should be widened; but how far? upon what principle, and to
what extent? Anxious to know this, he says, " And who is my
neighbor? "
Christ answers by what we take to be the recital of an incident
that had actually occurred, A fictitious story — a parable invented
for the occasion — would not so fully have answered the purpose he
had in view. A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho.
We are not told who or what he was: but the conditions and object
of the narrative require that he was a Jew. The road from Jerusa-
lem to Jericho — though short, and at certain seasons of the year
much frequented — was yet lonely and perilous to the last degree,
especially to a single and undefended traveller. It passes through
the heart of the eastern division of the wilderness of Judea, and runs
for a considerable space along the abrupt and winding sides of a deep
and rocky ravine, offering the greatest facilities for concealment and
attack. From the number of robberies and murders committed in it,
Jews of old called it " the Bloody Road," and it retains its character
still. v We travelled it, guarded by a dozen Arabs, who told, by the
way, of an English party that the year before had been attacked and
plundered and stripped, and we were kept in constant alarm by the
scouts sent out beforehand announcing the distant sight of danger-
ous-looking Bedouins, All the way from Bethany to the plain of
the Jordan is utter solitude — one single ruin, perhaps that of the
very inn to which the wounded Jew was carried, being the only sign
Life of Christ 28
134 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
@f human habitation that meets the eye. Somewhere along this road,
the solitary traveller of whom Jesus speaks is attacked. Perhaps he
earries his all along with him, and, unwilling to part with it, stand*
upon his defence, wishing to sell life and property as dearly as hs*
can. Perhaps he carries but little — nothing that the thievish ban!
into whose hands he falls much value. Whether it is that a .struggle
has taken place, or that exasperation at disappointment whets their
wrath, the robbers of the wilderness strip their victim of his raiment,
wound him, and leave him there half dead. As he lies in that condi-
tion on the roadside, first a priest, and then a Levite approaches. A
single glance is sufficient for the priest ; the Levite stops, and takes
a longer, steadier look. The effect in either case is the same — abhor-
rence and aversion. As men actuated by some other sentiment
beyond that of mere insensibility, they shrink back, putting as great
a distance as they can between them and the poor naked wounded
man; as if there were pollution in proximity — as if the very aii
around the man were infected — as if to go near him, much more to
touch, to lift, to handle him, were to be defiled. To what are we to
attribute this? To sheer indifference — to stony-hearted inhumanity?
That might explain their passing without a feeling of sympathy
excited or a hand of help held out, but it will not explain the quick
and sensitive recoil — the passing by on the other side. Is it, then,
the bare horror of the sight that drives them back? If there be
something to excite horror, surely there is more to move pity. That
naked, quivering body, those gaping, bleeding wounds, the pa-le and
speechless lips, the eyes so dull and heavy with pain, yet sending*oufc
such imploring looks — where is the human heart, left free to its own
spontaneous actings, they could fail to touch? But these men's
hearts — the hearts of the priest and Levite — are not left thus free .
not that their hearts are destitute of the common sympathies of our
nature — not that their breasts are steeled against every form and
kind of human woe — not that, in other circumstances, they would see
a wounded, half dead neighbor lying, and leave him unpitied and
unhelped. No! but because their hearts — as tender, it may have
been, by nature as those of others — have been trained in the school
of national and religious bigotry, and have been taught there, not the
lesson of sheer and downright inhumanity, but of that narrow exclu-
siveness which would limit all their sympathies and all their aid to
those of their own country and their own faith. The priest and the
Levite have been up at Jerusalem, discharging in their turn their
offices in the temple. They have got quickened afresh there all the
prejudices of their calling; they are returning to Jericho, with all
THE GOOD SAMARITAN 435
their prejudices strong within their breasts ; they see the sfi d sight
by the way; they pause a moment to contemplate it. Had it been
a brother priest, a brother Levite, a brother Jew that lay in that
piteous plight, none readier to help than they ; but he is naked, there
is nothing on him or about him to tell who or what he is — ho is
speechless, and can say nothing for himself. He may be a hated
Edomite, he may be a vile Samaritan, for aught that they can tell.
The possibility of this is enough. Touch, handle, help such a man !
they might be doing thereby a far greater outrage to their Jewish
prejudices than they did to the mere sentiment of indiscriminate pity
by passing him by, and so they leave him as they find him, in hasto
to get past the dangerous neighborhood, to congratulate themselves
on the w r onderful escape they had made — for the wounds of the poor
wretch were fresh, and bleeding freely — it could have been but shortly
before they came up that the catastrophe had occurred; had they
started but an hour or two earlier from Jerusalem his fate might have
been theirs. Glad at their own good fortune, they hurry on, finding
many an excuse besides the real one for their neglect.
How then are we exactly to characterize their conduct ? It wa3
a triumph of prejudice over humanity — the very kind of error and of
crime against which Jesus wished to guard the inquiring lawyer. And
it was at once with singular fidelity to nature, and the strictest perti-
nence to the question with which he was dealing, and to the occasion
that called it forth, that it was in the conduct of a priest and of a
Levite that this triumph stood displayed — for were they not the
fittest types and representatives of that malign and sinister influence
which their religion — misunderstood and misapplied — had exerted
over the common sympathies of humanity? Had they read aright
their own old Hebrew code, it would have taught them quite a
different lesson. Its broad and genial humanity is one of the marked
attributes by which, as compared with that of every other religion
then existing, theirs was distinguished. "I will have mercy and
not sacrifice," was the motto which its great Author had inscribed
upon its forehead. Its weightier matters were judgment and mercy,
and faith and love. It had taken the stranger under its speciaJ
and benignant protection. Twice over it had proclaimed, "Thou
shalt not see thv brother's ass or thy brother's ox fall down by the
way and hide thyself from them — thou shalt surely help him to lift
them up again.' And was a man not much better than an ass or ab
ox? And should not this priest and Levite — had they read aright
their own Jewish law — have lifted up again their prostrate bleeding
brother? But they had misread that law. They had misconceived
£36 THJL LIFE OF CHKIST.
and perverted that segregation from all the other communities of the
earth which it had taught the Jewish people to cultivate. Instead of
seeing in this temporary isolation the means of distributing the bless-
ings of the Messiah's kingdom wide over all the earth, they Lad
regarded it as raising them to a position of proud superiority from
w T hich they might say to every other nation, " Stand back, for we are
holier than you." And once perverted thus, the whole strength of
their religious faith went to intensify the spirit of nationality, and
inflame it into a passion, within whose close and sultry atmosphere
the lights even of common human kindness were extinguished. It
was in a priest and in a Levite that we should expect to see this
spirit carried out to its extreme degree, as it has been always in the
priestly caste that the fanatical piety which has trampled under foot
Hie kindliest sentiments of humanity has shown itself in its darkest
and most repulsive form.
After the jjriest and Levite have gone by, a certain Samaritan
approaches. He too is arrested. He too turns aside to look upon
this pitiable spectacle. For aught that he can tell, this naked wound-
ed man may be a Jew. There were many Jews and but few Samari-
tans travelhng ordinarily by this road. The chances were a thousand
to one that he was a Jew. And this Samaritan must have shared in
the common feelings of his people towards the Jews — hatred repay-
ing hatred. But he thinks not of distinction of race or faith. The
sight before him of a human being — a brother man in the extremity
of distress — swallow's up all such thoughts. As soon as he sees him
he has compassion on him. He alights — strips off a portion of his
own raiment — brings out the oil and the wine that he had provided
for his own comfort by the way — tenderly binds up the wounds —
gently lifts the body up and places it on his own beast — moves with
such gentle pace away as shall least exasperate the recent wounds.
Intent upon his task, he forgets his own affairs — forgets the danger
of lingering so long in such a neighborhood — is not satisfied until he
reaches the inn by the roadside. Having done so much, may he not
leave him now? No, he cannot part with him till he sees what a
night's rest will do. The morning sees his rescued brother better.
Now he may depart. Yes, but not till he has done all he can to
secure that he be properly waited on till all danger is over. He may
be a humane enough man, the keeper of this inn, but days will pass
before the sufferer can safely travel, and it may not be safe or wise
to count upon the continuance of his kindness. The Samaritan gives
the innkeeper enough to keep his guest for six or seven days, and
tells biro that whatever he. spends more will be repaid. H.fving
THE GOOD SAMARITAN. 437
thus done all that the most thoughtful kindness could suggest to
promote and secure recovery, he goes to bid his rescued brother fare-
well. Perhaps the good Samaritan leaves him in utter ignorance of
who or what he was. Perhaps those pale and trembling lips are still
unable to articulate his thanks — but that parting look in which a
heart's whole swelling gratitude goes out — it goes with him and kirn
dies a strange joy. He never saw the sun look half so bright — he
never saw the plain of Jordan look half so fair — a happier man than
he never trod the road to Jericho. True, he had lost a day, but he
had saved a brother ; and while many a time in after life the look of
that stark and bleeding body as he first saw it lying on the roadside
would come to haunt his fancy — ever behind it would there come that
look of love and gratitude to chase the spectral form away, and fill
his heart with light and joy.
Here too is a triumph, not one, however, of prejudice over humanity,
but of humanity over prejudice. For it were idle to think that it was
because of any superiority over the priest and the Levite in his abstract
ideas of the sphere of neighborhood, and of the claims involved in
simple participation of humanity, that this Samaritan acted as he
did. No, it was simply because he obeyed the impulses of a kind
and loving heart, and that these were strong enough to lift him above
all those prejudices of tribe and caste and faith, to which he, equally
with the Jew, was liable.
And was there not good reason for it, that in the records of our
Christian faith, in the teachings of its Divine Author, one solemn
warning of this kind should be lifted up — one illustrious example of
this kind should be exhibited? Our Redeemer came to establish
another and closer bond of brotherhood than the earth before had
known, to knit all true believers in the pure and holy fellowship of a
common faith, a common hope, a common heirship of eternal life
through him. But he would have us from the beginning know that
this bond, so new, so sacred, so divine, was never meant to thwart
or violate that other broader universal tie that binds the whole family
of our race together, that makes each man the neighbor of every
other man that tenants this earthly globe. Christianity, like Juda-
ism, has been perverted — perverted so as seriously to interfere with,
sometimes almost entirely to quench, the sentiment of a universal
philanthropy ; but it has been so only when its true genius and spirit
have been misapprehended ; for of all influences that have ever de-
scended upon our earth, none has ever done so much to break down
the walls of separation, that differences of country, language, race,
religion, have raised between man and man, and to diffuse the spirit
438 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
of that brotherly love which overleaps all these temporary and
artificial fences and boundary lines — which, subject to no law
of limits, is a law itself — which, like the air and light of heaven,
diffuses itself everywhere around over the broad field of humanity —
tempering all, uniting all, brightening all, smoothing asperities,
harmonizing discords, pouring a healing balm into all the rankling
sores of life.
" Which now of the three," said Jesus to the lawyer, " was neigh-
bor to him that fell among the thieves? "
Ashamed to say plainly " The Samaritan," yet unwilling or unable
to exhibit any hesitation in his reply, he said, " He that showed mercy
on him." Then said Jesus unto him, " Go, and do thou likewise." It is
not " Listen and applaud," it is " Go and do." If there be anything
above another that distinguishes the conduct of the good Samaritan,
it is its thoroughly practical character. He wasted no needless sym-
pathy, he shed no idle tears. There are wounds that may be dressed —
he puts forth his own hand immediately to the dressing of them.
There is a life that may be saved — he sets himself to use every method
by which it may be saved. He gives more than time, more than
money: he gives personal service. And that is the true human char-
ity that shows itself in prompt, efficient, self-forgetful, self-sacrificing
help. You can get many soft, susceptible, sentimental spirits to weep
over any scene or tale of woe. But it is not those who will weep the
readiest over the sorrow who will do the most to relieve it. Sympathy
has its own selfishness; there is a luxury in the tears that it loves idly
to indulge. Tears will fill the eye — should fill the eye — but the hand
of active help will brush them away, that the eye may see more
clearly what the hand has to do. Millions have heard or read the tale
of the Good Samaritan. Their eyes have glistened and their hearts
have been all aglow in approving, applauding sympathy; but of all
these millions, how many are there who imitate the example given,
who have given a day from their business to a suffering brother, who
have waited by the sick, and with their own hand have ministered to
his wants?
The beauty and force of that special lesson which the story of
the Good Samaritan was intended to convey is mightily enhanced as
we remember how recently our Lord himself had suffered from the
intolerance of the Samaritans; only a few days before, we know not
how few, having been refused entrance into one of their villages.
He himself then gave an exhibition of the very virtue he designed to
inculcate. But why speak of this as any single minor act of universal
love to mankind on his part? Were not his life and death one con-
tinuous manifestation of that love? Yes, bright as that single act of
THE LORD S PRAYEK. 439
the Good Samaritan shines in the annals of human kindness, all its
brightness fades away in the full blaze of that love of Jesus, which
saw not a single traveller, but our whole race, cast forth naked, bleed *
ing, dying, and gave not a day of his time, nor a portion of his rai-
ment, but a whole lifetime of service and of suffering, that they might
not perish, but have everlasting life.
XII.
The Lord's Prayer.*
At some time and in some place of which we must be content to
remain ignorant, Jesus had gone apart from his disciples to pray.
They had noticed his doing so frequently before ; but there was a
peculiarity in this case. He had either separated himself from them
by so short a distance, or they had come upon him afterwards so
silently and unobserved, that they stood and listened to him as he
prayed. Perhaps they had never previously overheard our Lord
when engaged in private devotion. The impression made on them
was so deep, the prayer that they had been listening to was so unlike
any that they themselves had ever offered — if that and that only be
prayer, they feel they know so little how to pray — that, on the im-
pulse of the moment, one of them, when Jesus had ceased, said to
him, " Lord, teach us to pray, as John also taught his disciples.''
We do not stand in the same peculiar external circumstances with
him who preferred this request, but the same need is ours There is
access still for us into the presence of our Redeemer, nor is there in
coming to him one petition that should spring more quickly to our
lips, one that can come from them more appropriately, than this —
"Lord, teadh us to pray." To pray is to realize the presence of the
Supreme — to come into the closest possible connection with the
greatest of Beings. To pray is to lay our imperfect tribute of ac-
knowledgment at his feet — to supplicate for that which we know that
he only can bestow — -to bring our sin to him, so that it may be f< >r-
given — our wants to him, so that he may supply them as seems best
in his sight. What is out warrant for making such approach? how
may it best be made? what should we ask for? and how should we
&sk for it? None can answer these questions for us as Jesus could.
How glairy, then, should we welcome, and how carefully should we
study such answers as he has been pleased to give!
« Luke 11 : 1-13.
440 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
On bringing together all that Christ has declared in the way of
precept, and illustrated in the way of example, I think it will appear
that as there is no one duty of the religious life of such preeminent
importance in its direct bearing on our spiritual estate, so there is no
one about the manner of whose right discharge fuller instructions
have been left by him. Thus, in the instance now before us, in answer
to the request presented to him, he at once recited a pra3^er, which
stands as the pattern or model of all true prayer. Without entering
into a minute examination of the separate clauses of this prayer,
let me crave your attention to three of the features by which it is
preeminently distinguished.
1. Its shortness and simplicity . It is very plain; not a part or
petition of it which, as soon as it is capable of praying, a child can-
not easily understand. It is very brief, occupying but a minute or
two in the utterance; so that there is not a season or occasion for
prayer in which it might not be employed. There is no ambiguity,
no circumlocution, no expansion, no repetition here. It is through-
out the direct expression of desire; that desire in each case clothing
itself in the simplest, compactest form of speech. In the Sermon on
the Mount, when Jesus first repeated this prayer, he offered it in
contrast with the tedious amplifications and reiterations of which the
Jewish and heathen prayers were then ordinarily composed. The
Jews, as the heathen of old, as the Mussulmans still, had their set
hours throughout the day for prayer; and so fond were they of ex-
hibiting the punctuality and precision and devoutness with which the
duty was discharged, that they often arranged it so that the set hour
should find them in some public place. Such practice, as altogether
contrary to the spirit and object of true devotion, as part of that
mere dead formalism which it was the great object of his teaching to
unmask, Jesus utterly condemned. "When thou prayest, thou shalt
not be as the hypocrites; for they love to pray standing in the syna-
gogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men.
Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou
prayest, enter into thy closet; and when thou hast shut thy door,
pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father, which seeth
in secret, shall reward thee openly. But when ye pray, use not vain
repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard
for their much speaking. Be not ye therefore like unto them: for
your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before ye ask him.
After this manner pray ye." It was as an antidote to the kind of
prayers then generally employed, as well as a pattern specimen for
after use within the Church, that Jesus then proceeded to repeat the
THE LORD'S PRAYER. 441
prayer which has been called by his name. It was not to fte by or be
deposited as a mere standard measure by which other prayers were
to be tried. It was to be used — to be repeated. When, many months
after its first recital, it was said to Jesus, " Lord, teach us to pray, as
John also taught his disciples," he was not satisfied with saying
u Pray generally in such a mode or style as this ;" he prescribed the
rery words, " When ye pray, say" and he repeated the very prayer
that he formerly had spoken. Not that he put much or any import-
ance upon the exact words to be employed. In three out of the six
petitions of which the prayer is made up, there are variations in the
words, not enough to make the slightest difference in the meaning,
but sufficient to show that it was not simply by a repetition of the
words that the prayer was truly offered. With rigorous exactness,
this prayer might be said over and over again till it became a very
vain repetition — all the vainer, perhaps, because of the very excellence
of the form that was so abused. But over and over again — day by
day — it might be repeated without any such abuse. All depends
upon how you use it. Enter into its meaning — put your own soul
and their own sense into the words — let it be the true and earnest
desires of your heart that you thus breathe into the ear of the Eter-
nal — and you need not fear how often you repeat it, or think that
because you say the same words over again you sin. Our Lord him
self, within the compass of an hour, repeated the same prayer thrice
in the garden. Use it, however, as a mere form, with no other idea
than that because it has been "authoritatively prescribed" it ought
to be employed — a single such use of it is sin.
2. The order and proportion of the petitions in the Lord's prayei.
It naturally divides itself into two equal parts ; the one embracing
the first three petitions, the other the three remaining ones — these
parts palpably distinguished from each other by this, that in the
former the petitions all have reference to God, in the latter to man
In the former the thoughts and desires of the petitioner are all
engrossed with the name, the kingdom, the will of the grea*t Being
addressed ; in the latter with his own wants, and sins, and trials. It
would be carrying the idea of the Lord's prayer as a pattern, or
model, to an illegitimate length, were we to say that because about
one-half of the prayer is devoted to the first of these objects, and one
half t: the other, our prayers should be divided equally between
hem. Yet surely there is something to be learned from the prece-
dence assigned here to the great things which concern the name, an A
kingdom, and will of our Heavenly Father, as well as from the space
which these occupy in this prayer. You have but to reflect a moment
442 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
on the structure and proportion of parts in any of our ordinary pray-
ers, whether in private or in public, and especially on the place and
room given in them to petitions touching the coming of God's king-
dom, and the doing of his will on earth as it is done in heaven, to be
satisfied as to the contrast which in this respect they present to the
model laid down by Christ himself. Our prayers, such as they are,
with all their weaknesses and imperfections, will not, we are grateful
to remember, be cast out because we yield to a strong natural bias,
and cast into the foreground, and keep prominent throughout, those
personal necessities of our spiritual nature which primarily urge us
to the throne of grace. Our Heavenly Father not only knoweth what
things we need before we ask them, he knoweth also what the things
are, the need of which presses first and heaviest upon our hearts.
Nor will he close his ear to any returning, repentant, hungering, and
thirsting spirit, simply because these are pressed first and most
urgently upon his regard. Is it not well, nevertheless, that we should
be reminded, as the prayer dictated by our Saviour so emphatically
does, that selfishness may and does creep into our very prayers, and
that the perfect form of all right approach, all right address, to the
Divinity, is that in which the place of supremacy which of right be-
longs to Him is duly and becomingly recognized. More especially
should it be so in all prayers that go up from this sinful earth t<
those pure and holy heavens ; for if it be true — as the whole body o.
the prayer prescribed by Jesus teaches us that it is — that we are liv-
ing in a world where God's name is not hallowed as it ought to be, is
often dishonored and profaned — in a world where God's kingdom of
justice and holiness and love is not universally established, where
another and quite opposite kingdom contests with it the empire of
human souls — in a world where other wills than that of God are
busily at work, not always consenting to or working under his, but
resisting and opposing it; — then surely if the name, the kingdom,
the will of our Father which is in heaven were as dear to us as they
ought to be, first and above all things besides, we should desire that
his name should be hallowed, his kingdom should come, his will
should be done on earth as it is done in heaven. Let us then as
often as we use this prayer receive with meekness the rebuke it casts
upon that tendency and habit of our nature which leads us even in
our prayers to put our own things before the things of our Heavenly
Father; and let us urge our laggard spirits onward and upward from
the sense and sight of our personal necessities, till, filled with adora-
tion, and gratitude, and love, before we even make mention before
him of a single individual want, we be ready with a true heart to say,
THE LORD S PRAYER. 413
"Our Father ^ which art in heaven, hallowed be thy Lime; thy king-
dom come ; thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven."
And while receiving the lesson clearly to be gathered from the
place and space occupied by the first three petitions of our Lord's
prayer, let its fourth petition, in its sequence and in its solitariness,
and in its narrowness, proclaim to us the place even among our owk
things which earthly and bodily, as compared with spiritual pro-
visions, possessions, enjoyments, ought to have. Is it without a
meaning that we are taught to pray first, " Thy will be done," and
then immediately thereafter, "Give us this day our daily bread"?
The bread is to be asked that by it the life may be preserved, and
the life is to be preserved that it may be consecrated to the doing of
God's will. According to the tenor of the prayer and the connection
of these two petitions, we are not at liberty to ask for the daily bread
irrespective of the object to which the life and strength which it pro-
longs and imparts are to be devoted. It were a vain and hollow
thing in any of us to pray that God's will be done, as in heaven, so
on earth, if we do not desire and strive that it should be done, as by
others, so also by ourselves. And it is as those who do thus desire,
and are thus striving, that we are alone at all likely to proceed to
say, " Give us this day our daily bread." A natural and moderate
request, we may be ready to think, which all men will at once be
prepared to present to God. Yet not so easy to present in the spirit
in which Jesus would have us offer it. Not so easy to feel our con-
tinued and entire dependence on God for those very things that we
are most tempted to think we have acquired by our own exertions,
and secured to ourselves and our families by our own skill and pru-
dence. Not so easy to pray for a competent portion of the things of
this life, only that by the manner of our using and enjoying them the
will of our Heavenly Father, his own gracious purpose in placing us
where we are placed, and in giving us all that we possess, may be
carried out. Not so easy to limit thus our desires and efforts in this
direction, and to be satisfied with whatever the portion be that God
pleases to bestow. Not so easy to renew this petition, day by day,
as conscious that all which comes each day comes direct from the
1 1 and of God — comes to those who have no right or title to claim it
as their own — who should ask and receive it continually as a gift
Not so easy to narrow the petition to the d£y, leaving to-morrow i*u
God's hands. The simplest and easiest, though it seems at first, of
all the six petitions, perhaps this one abc 1 1 our daily bread is one
that we less frequently than any other present in the true spirit. It
stands there in the very centre of the prayer — the only one boar-
444 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ing upon our earthly condition — preceded and followed by others,
with whose spirit it must or ought to be impregnated — from which it
cannot be detached. Secular in its first aspect, in this connection
how spiritual does it appear!
3. The fulness, condensedness, comprehensiveness, universality of
the prayer. Of course it never was intended to confine within the
limits of its few sentences the free spirit of prayer. The example of
our Lord himself, of the apostles, of the Church in all ages, has taught
ns how full and varied are the utterances of the human heart, when
it breathes itself out unrestrainedly unto God in prayer. Where the
Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty — ample the freedom and wide
the range that the Holy Spirit takes when he throws the human
spirit into the attitude, and sustains it in the exercise of prayer —
prompting those yearnings which cannot be uttered, those desires
and affections which words multiplied to the uttermost fail adequately
to express. In the past history, in the existing condition of every
human soul, there is an infinitude of individual peculiarities To
forbid all references to these, all manifestations of these in prayer —
to tie every one down at every season to pray as every one else — to
allow no minute confession of particular transgressions, no recital of
the circumstances in which they were committed, aggravations by
which they were accompanied, no acknowledgment of special mercies,
nor glad and grateful recounting how singularly appropriate and sat-
isfying they had been — to cramp down within one dry and narrow
mould all the plaints of sorrow, the moanings of penitence, the aspi-
rations of desire, the beatings of gratitude, the breathings of love, the
exultations of joy and hope, which fill the human heart, and which,
in moments of filial trust, it would pour out into the ear of the
Eternal — this were indeed to lay the axe at the root of all devotion.
But while pleading for the very fullest liberty of prayer, let us not be
insensible of the great benefit there is in ever and anon stepping out
of that circle in which our own personal and particular sorrows and
sins shape and intensify our prayers, into that upper and wider region
in which, laying all those specialties for the time aside, we join the
great company of the prayerful in all ages, in those few and simple,
yet all-embracing petitions which they and we, and all that have
gone before, and all that shall come after, unite in presenting to the
Hearer and Answerer of prayer. And this is what we do in repeating
the Lord's prayer. In it we have, stripped of all secondary or ad-
ventitious elements, the concentrated spirit and essence of prayer, a
brief epitome of all the topics that prayer should embrace, a con-
densed expression of all those desires of the heart that should go up
THE LOED'S PRAYER. 445
to God in prayer. It is not a prayer this for any one period of life —
for any one kind of character — for any one outward or inward con-
dition of things — for anyone country — for any one age. The child may
lisp its simple sentences as soon as it knows how to pray; it comes
with no less fitness from the wrinkled lips of age. The penitent in
the first hour of his return to God, the straggler in the thick of U&e
spiritual conflict, the believer in the highest soarings of his faith and
love, may take up and use alike this prayer. The youngest, tli6
oldest, the simplest, the wisest, the most sin-stained, the most saintly,
can find nothing here unsuitable, unseasonable. It gathers up into
one what they all can and should unite in saying as they bend in
supplication before God. And from the day when first it was pub-
lished on the mount, as our Lord's own directory for prayer, down
through all these eighteen centuries, it has been the single golden
link running through the ages that has bound together in one the
whole vast company of the prayerful. Is there a single Christian
now living upon earth — is there ons among the multitude of the re-
deemed now praising God in heaven, who never prayed this prayer ?
I believe not one. It is not then, as isok^ted spirits, alone in our
communion with God, it is as units in that unnumbered congregation
of those who have bent, are bending, will bend, before the Throne,
that we are to take up and to use this prayer. Not " my Father,"
but " our Father," is its key-note. Let it calm, and soothe, and ele-
vate our spirits, as, leaving all that belongs to our own little separate
circle of thoughts, and doubts, and fears, and hopes, and joys, be-
hind, we rise to take our place in this vast company, and to mingle
our prayers with theirs.
And to what is it that the Lord's prayer owes especially the uni-
versality of its embrace — the omnipotence of its power? To the
special character in which it presents God to all — the peculiar stand-
ing before him into which it invites all to enter. It is not to him as
the great I am, the Omnipotent, the Omnipresent Creator and Lord
of all ; it is not to him as dwelling in the light that no man can
approach to— as clothed with all the attributes of majesty and power,
and justice, and truth, and holiness, the Moral Governor of the Uni-
verse — that it invites us to come. No, but to him as our Father in
heaven — a Father regarding us with infinite pity, loving us with au
everlasting love, willing and waiting to bestow, able ar.d ready to
help us. It is to him who taught us this prayer that we owe the
revelation of God to us as such a Father. More than that, it is to
Christ we owe the establishment of that close and endearing con-
nection of sonship to the Father — a connection which it only remains
446 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
for us to recognize, in order to enter into possession of all its fnivi-
leges and joys. He who taught this prayer to his disciples, taught
them, too, that no man can come unto the Father but through him.
Tt were a great injustice unto him, if, because he has not named his
jwn name in this prayer, we should forget that it is he who, by his
Incarnation and Atonement, has so linked God and man, earth and
heaven, together, that all those sentiments of filial trust and con-
fidence which this prayer expresses, may and should be cherished by
every individual member of our race. There is not a living man who
may not use this prayer ; for while it is true that no man cometh to
the Father but through Christ, it is equally true — indeed the one
truth is involved in the other — that all men, every man, may now so
come ; not waiting till he is sure that he is a child of God, has such
faith in God, or gratitude to God, or willingness to serve God as he
knows a child should cherish ; not grounding his assurance of God's
Fatherhood to him on his sonship to God — no, but welcoming the
assurance given to him in and by Jesus Christ, that God is his Father,
and using that very Fatherhood as his plea in his first and last, his
every approach to him. To each and every one of the multitude
upon the mountain-side of Galilee — to them just as they were — to
them simply as sons of men, partakers of that humanity which he
also shared, Jesus said, " God is your Father, treat him as your
Father, commend your future to him, cast all your care upon him as
such." " Take no thought, saying, What shall we eat ? or, What
shall we drink ? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed ? Your heavenly
Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things." Pray to
him as such, then. " When thou pray est, pray to thy Father which
seeth in secret." After this manner pray ye — " Our Father which
art in heaven." And what Jesus said to the multitude on the moun-
tain-side, he says to every child of Adam. Was it not indeed upon
the existence and character of that very relationship of God to us
and to all men that Jesus grounded the assurance he would have us
cherish that our prayers shall not, cannot, go up in vain to haaven ?
For it is worthy of remark that on both occasions when this prayer
was recited within the compass of the same discourse, shortly after
he had repeated it — as if his thoughts were returning to the subject,
and he wished to fix firm in the hearts of his disciples a faith in the
efficacy of such prayer — he added, "I say unto you, Ask, and it shall
be given ; seek, and ye shall find ; knock, and it shall be opened unto
you. For every one that asketh " — asks as I have told you he should,
or for what I have told you he should — "every one that asketh,
receiveth; and he that seeketh, findeth; and to him that knoeketh, it
OUTLINE STUDIES. 447
shall be opened. If a son shall ask bread of any of you that is a
father, will he give him a stone ? or if he ask a fish, will he for a fish
give him a serpent? . ... If ye, then, being evil, know how to give
good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Heaven lr
Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him*"
OUTLINE STUDIES.
The first period of Christ in Persea, just passed in review, embraced
a wide range of activities and teachings. During the sojourn in Persea
next occurring, now under consideration, Jesus is found for the most
part at one place — the region where he had met and been baptized
by John and where he had won his first disciples. The people con-
tinued to come to him, but there seems to be no constraint of outward
circumstances accounting for our Lord's delay when he received the
tidings of Lazarus' sickness. His tarrying for two days appears to
have been due to an inward sense of the Father's will. Then, as soon
as the hour comes that opens the way, Jesus proceeds to Bethany with
his disciples. Just outside the village Jesus first talks with Martha
and then with Mary, his words containing some of his greatest utterances
on death, life, and immortality. Then occurs Christ's supreme miracle
of the resurrection of Lazarus. But before the life-giving words are
spoken three things should be noted: first, the sensitiveness and
sympathy of Jesus shown in the tears which he sheds; second, the
recognition in his audible prayer that he is the Sent of the Father, the
Son of God; third, the use of human agency in the rolling away of the
stone and the loosening of the cerements of the tomb.
This third feature suggests the great practical lesson of the place
and the value of human service in the work of arousing and upbuilding
human souls. It is not ours to see the awakening of the body from
death, but it is possible to witness the quickening of souls, and in this
work those who possess the new life have an essential part. It is true
that the divine, life-giving energy must come from God, but obstruc-
tions that hinder its reaching the hearts of the unsaved can be
removed by the sympathetic and tactful agency of Christian friends.
And when souls are restored to life, the people of faith can do much
to free them from the fettering bands of old habits, the limitations of
ignorance and prejudice, and to open the way to their progress and
complete freedom in the activities of the new nature.
This startling deed of Christ's power was performed so near to
Jerusalem and in such a public manner that it offered an immediate
challenge to the ruling classes represented by both the Pharisees and
447a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the Sadducees, and in a meeting of the Sanhedrim it was decreed that
Jesus must die as a sacrifice required by a policy of national safety.
These leaders were moved simply by ideas of official self-interest,
and in their dooming of Christ to death they supposed that they were
merely carrying out a plan of far-reaching political strategy, by which
at one stroke they would dispose of their enemy and insure their con-
tinued autonomy as a people. Caiaphas their chief saw not at all
the deeper implications of his statement that it was expedient that
one man should die for the people, and yet he was uttering in uncon-
scious prophecy the tremendous principle of sacrifice that is central
in the atonement. The idea of Caiaphas with the motive with which
he voiced it subtracted nothing from the guilt of these jugglers with
life and justice. It is only another instance of God taking up the
issues of an evil man's action and directing them into the stream of
his own purposes of redemption, of making even the wrathful intentions
of men to praise him.
PART III. MAIN MINISTRY IN JUDEA AND PER^A.
Study 14. Supreme Miracle of the Raising of Lazarus.
(1) Message reaching Christ in Per,ea 4476
a. He is to some degree in seclusion 4476
6. Martha and Mary send word that Lazarus is sick 4476
(2) Christ's immediate words and the journey 4476-451
a. An assuring but enigmatic reply 4476, 448
6. Statements of the disciples 448-451
c. Their journey to Bethany 451
(3) Words to the sisters when he arrives 451-458
a. Interview with Martha • 451-458
6. Interview with Mary 458
(4) The raising of Lazarus 458-461
a. Christ's sympathy and tears 458, 459
6. Approach to the grave 460
c. Removal of the stone 460
d. Prayer of Christ 460, 461
e. Command to come forth 461
/. Lazarus rises and stands erect 461
g. Christ bids that he be loosed 461
(5) Lessons of the miracle 461-463
a. Earthly and heavenly factors in work 461, 462
6. Human and divine elements in Christ 462
c. In him we find both sympathy and succor 462, 463
JESUS THE RESURRECTION AND THE LIFE. 4476
(6) Action of the Jewish authorities 463-466
a. A meeting of the Sanhedrim called 463
b. Pharisees and Sadducees make common cause 463, 464
c. View of political effect of Christ's continued activity 464, 465
d. Unwitting prophecy of Caiaphas 465, 466
e. Decision of Sanhedrim for Christ's death 465
XIII.
Jesus the Resurrection and the Life.
Christ's first visit to Persea, od Lis way up to the Feast of Dedi-
cation, was one of much locomotion and manifold activities. His
second was dedicated rather to seclusion and repose. He retired to
one chosen and hallowed spot — the place where John at first bap-
tized — where he himself had first entered on his public ministry.
Many resorted to him there, and many believed on him, but he did
not go about as he had done before. Living in quiet with his dis-
ciples, a message came to him from Bethany. Some sore malady
had seized upon Lazarus. His sisters early think of that kind friend,
who they knew had cured so many others, and who surely would not
be unwilling to succor them in their distress, and heal their brother ;
but they knew what had driven him lately from Jerusalem, and are
unwilling to break in upon his retirement, or ask him to expose him-
self once more to the deadly hatred of his enemies. The disease runs
on its course; Lazarus is on the very point of death. They can
refrain no longer. They send off a messenger to Jesus. No urgent
entreaty, however, is conveyed that he should hasten to their relief.
No course is dictated. No desire even expressed. They think it is
not needed. They remember all the kindnesses they had already
experienced at his hands — how often he had made their house his
home— what special marks of personal attachment and regard he
had shown to themselves and to their brother. They deem it enough,
therefore, to bid their messenger say, as soon as he met Jesus,
"Lord, he whom thou lovest is sick." Jesus hears the message,
and, without giving any other indication of his purpose, simply says,
"This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the
Son of God might be glorified thereby." This is all the answer thai
he makes to a message so simply and delicately expressed; by thai
very simplicity and delicacy making all the stronger appeal to his
sympathy. Nothing more being said by Jesus, nor anything furthei
o John 10 • 39-42 ; 11 : 1-27.
448 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
apparently intended to be done, the messenger of the anxious sisters
has to be satisfied with this. It seems to be so far satisfactory :
"This sickness is not unto death." Jesus either knows that Lazarus
is to recover, or he is to take some method of averting death — is to
cure him; may have already done so by a Avord spoken — a volition
formed at a distance. Treasuring up the sentence that he has heard
uttered, and extracting from it such comfort as he can, the messengei
returns to Bethany, and Jesus remains still two days in the place
where he was. During these two days the incidents of the message
and the answer fail not to be the subject of frequent converse among
the disciples. They too might understand it to be the reason of
their Master's saying and doing nothing further in the matter, that
he was aware that the death the sisters dreaded was not to happen;
or they too might think that his great power had already been exerted
on behalf of one whom they knew he loved so much. So might they
interpret the saying, "This sickness is not unto death;" but what can
they make of those other words by which these had been followed
up? How could it be said of this sickness of Lazarus, whether it
left him naturally or was removed by a mysterious exercise of their
Master's powers of healing, that it was to be "for the glory of God,
that the Son of God might be glorified thereby" ? This was saying
a great deal more of the illness, however cured, than, so far as they
can see, could be truly and fitly said of it. No further explanation,
however, is made by Jesus, and they must wait the issue.
Two days afterwards Jesus calmly and resolutely, but somewhat
abruptly and unexpectedly, says to them, "Let us go into Judea
again." Though nothing was said or hinted about the object of the
proposed visit, it would be very natural that the disciples should con-
nect it with the message that had come from Bethany. But if it
was to cure Lazarus that Christ was going, why had he not gone
sooner? If the sickness that had been reported to him was not unto
death, why go at all? why expose himself afresh to the malice of
those who were evidently bent upon his destruction? ,; Master,'
they say to him, " the Jews of late sought to stone thee, and goest
thou thither again?" a remonstrance dictated by a sincere and laud-
able solicitude for their Master's safety, yet not without ingredients
of ignorance and mistrust. "Are there not," said Jesus in reply,
"twelve hours in the day?" 'My time for working, for the doing
the will of my Father which is in heaven, is it not a set time, its
bounds as fixed as those of the natural day, having, like it, its twelve
hours, that no man can take from and no man can add to? The
hours of this my allotted period for finishing my earthly work must
JESUS THE BESURRECTION AND THE LIFE. 449
rtm out their course ; and while they are running, so long as I am
upon the path marked out for me, walking by the light that comes
from heaven, they cannot be shortened, go where I may ; so long as
I go under my Father's guidance, so long as I do what he desires,
my life is safe. True, eleven hours of this my day may be already
gone ; I may have entered upon the last and twelfth, but till it end
a shield of defence is round me that none can break through. Fear
not for me then, till that twelfth hour strike I am as safe in Judea as
here. And for your own comfort, know that what is true of me is
true of every man who walks in God's own light — the light that the
guiding Spirit gives to every man — kindled within his soul to direct
him through all his earthly work. If any man walk in that light, he
will not, cannot stumble, or fall, or perish ; but if he walk in the night,
go where he is not called, do what he is not bidden, then he stumbleth,
because there is no light in him. He has turned the day into night,
and the doom of the night-traveller hangs over him.'
He pauses to let these weighty truths sink deep into the disciples'
hearts, then, turning to them, he says, " Our friend Lazarus sleepeth,
but I go that I may awake him out of sleep." In their anxiety about
their Master they had forgotten their absent friend whose love to Jesus
had flowed over upon them, to whom they also were attached. How
humanly, how tenderly does the phrase " our friend Lazarus " recall
him to their thoughts ! It would seem as if the ties that knit our
Lord to the members of that family at Bethany had been formed for
this as for other reasons, to show how open the heart of Jesus was,
not merely to a universal love to all mankind, but to the more pecu-
liar and specific affections of friendship. Among the twelve there
was one whom he particularly loved ; among the families he visited
there was one to which he was particularly attached. Outside the
circle of his immediate followers there was one whom he called his
friend. Had he not already so distinctly said that his sickness was not
unto death, the disciples, remembering that he had said of Jairus'
daughter, " she is not dead, but sleepeth," might at first have caught
the true meaning of their Master's words ; but the idea of the death of
Lazarus is so far from their thoughts, that they put the first interpre-
tation on them that occurs, and without thinking on the worse than
trifling end that they were thus attributing to Christ as the declared
purpose of his proposed visit, they say, "Lord, if he sleep, he shall
do well." Then said Jesus unto them plainly, " Lazarus is dead ; and
I tun glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent ye may
believe; nevertheless let us go unto him." Glad that he was not
there ! Yes, for it spared him the pain of looking at his friend in his
Uf« o» Christ. 29
450 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
agony, at his sisters in their grief. Glad ; for had he been there,
could he have resisted the appeal of such a deathbed over which
such mourners were bending ? Could he, though meaning afterwards
to raise him from the dead, have stood by and seen Lazarus depart ?
Glad that he was not there! Was he insensible, then, to all the
pangs which that departure must have cost Martha and Mary — this
one among the rest, that he was not there, and had not come when
sent for? Was he insensible to the four days' weeping for the dead
that his absence had entailed ? Glad that he was not there ! Had
the mourning sisters heard the words, they might have fancied that
his affection for their family had suffered a sudden chill. But there
was no lack of sensibilitj 7 to their sufferings ; his sympathies with
them had suffered no reverse. It was not that he loved or pitied
them the less. It was that his sympathies, instead of resting on the
single household of Bethany, were taking in the wider circle of his
discipleship, and through them, or along with them, the whole family
of our sinful, suffering humanity. It was with a calm, deliberate
forethought that, on hearing of the sickness, he allowed two days to
pass without any movement made to Bethany. He knew when Laz-
arus died — knew that he had died two days before he told his disci-
ples of it, for the death, followed by speedy burial, must have occurred
soon after the messenger left Bethany, in all likelihood before he
reached the place where Jesus was; for if a day's journey carried
the messenger (as it might have done to Bethabara), and another
such day of travel carried Jesus and his disciples back again to Beth-
any, as Lazarus was four days in the grave when Jesus reached the
spot, his decease must have taken place within a very short time
after the original despatch of the message. Knowing when it hap-
pened, Jesus did not desire to be present at it — deliberately arranged
it so that it should not be till four days after the interment that he
should appear in Bethany. He had already in remote Galilee raised
two from the dead — one soon after death, the other before burial.
But now, in the immediate neighborhood of Jerusalem, in presence
of a mixed company of friends and enemies, he has resolved, in rais-
ing Lazarus, to perform the great closing, crowning miracle of his
ministry ; and he will do it so that not the most captious or the most
incredulous can question the reality either of the death or of the res-
urrection. It was to be our Lord's last public appearance among the
Jews previous to his crucifixion. It was to be the last public miracle
he was to be permitted to work. From the day that this great deed
was done was to date the formal resolution of the Sanhedrim to put
him to death. This close connection of the raising of Lazarus with
JESUS THE KESUPvBECTION AND THE LIFE. 451
his own decease was clearly before his eye. His sayings and doings
at Bethabara show with what deep interest he himself looked for-
ward to the issue. If we cannot with certainty say that no miracle
he ever wrought occupied beforehand so much of our Saviour's
thoughts, we can say that no other miracle was predicted and pre-
pared for as this one was.
"Lazarus is dead nevertheless let us go unto him." Had
the disciples but remembered their Master's first words, to which the
key had now been put into their hands, they might at once have
gathered what the object of that journey was in which Jesus invited
them to accompany him, and the thought of it might have banished
other fancies and other fears. But slow to realize the glory of the
coming and predicted miracle, or quick to connect it with the after-
risk and danger, they hesitate. One there is among them as slow in
faith as the slowest — fuller, perhaps, than any of them of mistrust —
yet quick and fervid in his love, seeing nothing but death before
Jesus if once he shows himself at Jerusalem — who says unto his fel-
low-disciples, "Let us also go, that we may die with him:" the ex-
pression of a gloomy and somewhat obstinate despondency, sinking
into despair, yet at the same time of heroic and chivalrous attach-
ment. Jesus says nothing to the utterer of this speech. He waits
for other and after occasions to take Thomas into his hands, and turn
his incredulity into warm and living faith.
The group journeys on to Bethany, and at last comes near the
village. Some one has witnessed its approach, and goes with the
tidings to where the mourning sisters and those who have to comfort
them are sitting. It may have been into Martha's ear that the tid-
ings are first whispered — Mary beside her, too overwhelmed with
grief to hear. As soon as she hears that Jesus is coming, Martha
rises and goes out to meet him. Mary, whether she hears or not,
sees her sister rise and go, yet stays still in the house — the two sis-
ters, the one in her eager movement, the other in her quiet rest, here
as elsewhere showing forth the difference of their characters. Mar-
tha is soon in the Saviour's presence. The sight of Jesus fills her
heart with strange and conflicting emotions. In his kind look she
reads the same affectionate regard he had ever shown. "Yet had he
not delayed coming to them in their hour of greatest need? She
will bbt reproach, for her confidence is still unbroken. Yet she can-
not help feeling what looked liked forgetfulness or neglect. Above
all such personal feelings the thought of her dead brother rises. She
thinks of the strange words the messenger had reported. She knows
not well what they could have meant, to what they could have point-
452 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ed ; but tiie hope still lingers in her heart, that now that he at last
is here, the love and power of Jesus may find some way of manifest-
ing themselves — perhaps even in recalling Lazarus from the dead
And in the tumult of these mixed feelings — in the agitation of regret
and confidence, and grief and hope — she breaks out in the simple but
pathetic utterance, " Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had
not died " — ' it is what Mary and I have been saying to ourselves and
to one another, over and over again, ever since that sad and sorrow-
ful hour. If only thou hadst been here ! I do not blame you for
not being here. I do not know what can have kept you from com-
ing. I will not doubt or distrust your love — but if thou hadst been
here my brother had not died— you could, you would have kept him
from dying — you could, you would have raised him up, and given
him back to us in health. Nay, " I know that even now whatsoever
thou wii-t ask of God, God will give it thee." '
The reply of Jesus seems almost to have been framed for the very
purpose of checking the hope that was obviously rising in Martha's
breast. " Thy brother," he says, "shall rise again" — words not in-
deed absolutely precluding the possibility of a present restoration of
her brother to life, but naturally directing her thoughts away from
such a restoration to the general resurrection of the dead. Such at
least is their effect upon Martha, as is evident from her reply, " 1
knew that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day" —
a reply which, though it proved the firmness of her faith in the future
and general resurrection of the dead, indicated something like disap-
pointment at what Jesus said. But our Lord's great object in enter-
ing into this conversation had now been gained. Instead of fostering
the expectation of immediate relief, he had drawn Martha's thoughts
off for a time from the present, and fixed them upon the distant
future of the invisible and eternal world. Having created thus the
fit opportunity—here on the eve of performing the greatest of his
miracles — here in converse with one of sincere but imperfect faith,
plunged in grief, and seeking only the recovery of a lost brother,
Jesus says, " I- am the resurrection and the life ; he that believeth on
me, though he were dead, yet shall he live ; and whosoever lively, and
believeth on me shall never die " — as if he had said, 'Martha, Martha
thou wert troubled once when I was in your dwelling with the pett\
cares of your household, but now a heavier trouble has come upon
your heart. You mourn a brother's death, but would that even now
1 could raise your thoughts above the consideration of the life, the
death, the resurrection of the perishable body, to the infinitely more
momentous one of the life and the death of the indwelling, the im«
J
JESUS THE EESUEKEOTION AND THE LIFE. 453
mortal soul ! You are looking to me with a lingering hope that I
might find some way to assuage your present grief by giving bach to
you the brother that lies buried. You believe so far in me as to have
the confidence that whatever I asked of God, God would give it me.
Would that I could get you and. all to look to me in another and far
higher character than the assuager of human sorrow, the bringer of
a present relief ; that I could fix your faith upon, me as the Prince of
life, the author, the bestower, the originator, the supporter, the ma-
turer of that eternal life within the soul over which death hath so
little dominion — that whosoever once hath this life begun, in dying
3till lives, and in living can never die.' For let us notice, as helping
us to a true comprehension of these wonderful words of our Kedeemer,
that immediately after their utterance, he addressed to Martha the
pointed question, "Believest thou this '?" It was not unusual for our
Lord to ask some profession of faith in his power to help from those
on wham or for whom that power was about to be exerted. He did
not need to ask any such profession from Martha. She had already
declared her full assurance that he had the power of Deity at com-
mand. The very manner in which the question was put to Martha,
"Believest thou this?" plainly intimates that some weighty truth lay
wrapped up in the words just uttered beyond any to which she had
already assented. Had there been nothing in what Christ now said
beyond what Martha had previously- believed — to which he had
already testified — such an interrogation would have been without a
meaning. It cannot be a mere proclamation of the immortality of
the soul and the resurrection of the body, and of Christ's connection
with them, either as their human announcer or their Divine author,
that is here made. No such interpretation would explain or justify
the language here employed. The primary and general assertion, " I
am the resurrection and the life," gets its only true significance assign-
ed to it by the two explanatory statements with which it was followed
up. "I am the life," said Jesus, not in any general sense as being
the great originator and sustainer of the soul's existence, but in this
peculiar and specific sense, that "whosoever liveth and believeth on
me" — or rather, liveth by believing on me — "shall never die." And
"I am the resurrection" in this sense, that "whosoever believeth on
me, though he were dead, yet shall he live."
Such language connects, in some peculiar way, the life and
.resurrection that Jesus is now speaking of with believing on him ; it
at least implies that he has some other and closer connection with
the life and the resurrection of men who believe than he has with
those of men who believe not. Jesus, in fact, is here, in these mem-
454 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
orable words, only proclaiming to Martha, and through her to the
world of sinners he came to save, what the great end of his mission
is, and how it is that that end is accomplished. Sin entered into this
world, and death — not the dissolution of the body, but spiritual
death — this death by sin. "In the day thou eatest thereof thou
shalt die." And the death came with the first transgression. The
pulse of the true spiritual life, of life in God and to God, ceased its
beatings. Death reigned in all its coldness; the warmth of a per-
vading love to God had gone, and the chill of a pervading fear seized
upon the soul. Death reigned in all its silence, for the voice of cease-
less prayer and praise was hushed. It rained in all its torpid inac-
tivity, for no longer was there a continued putting forth of the entire
energies of the spirit in the service of its Maker. And the same
death that came upon the first transgressor has passed upon all men,
for that all have sinned. And if to be under condemnation be death,
if to be carnally-minded be death ; if amid all the variety of motives by
which we naturally are influenced, there be, but at lengthened inter-
vals, a weak and partial regard to that Great Being whom no creature
can altogether banish from his thoughts, then surely the Scriptures
err not in the representation that it was into a world of the dead that
Jesus came. He came to be the quickener of the dead ; having life
in himself, to give of this life to all who came to him for it. " The
life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and show
unto you that eternal life which was with the Father, and was mani-
fested unto us." " In this was manifested the love of God toward us,
because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we
might live through him." " And we know that the Son of God is
come. This is the true God and eternal life." "And this is the rec-
ord that God hath given unto us eternal life, and this life is in his
Son. He that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son of
God hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe
on the name of the Son of God, that ye may know that ye have eter-
nal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God."
Such are the testimonies borne by a single apostle in one short
epistle (1st Epistle of John). More striking than any other words
upon this subject are those of our Lord himself. Take up the gos-
pel of St John, the special record of those discourses of our Lord in
which he most fully unfolded himself, telling who he was, and what
he came to this earth to do, and you will not find one of them in
which the central idea of life coming to the dead through him is not
presented. Thus, in the conversation with Nicodemus on the occa-
sion of his first Passover, you hear him say : "As Moses lifted up the
.iESUS THE RESURRECTION AND THE LIFE 455
serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up .
that whosoever belie veth in him should not perish, but have eternal
life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten
Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have
everlasting life." John 3:14-16. Thus, also, in his conversation
with the woman of Samaria : "If thou knewest the gift of God, and
who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have
asked of him, and he would have given thee living" (life-giving)
"water. Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: but
whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never
thirst ; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of
water springing up into everlasting life." John 4:10-14. Thus, also,
in his next discourse at Jerusalem, on the occasion of his second
Passover : " For as the Father raiseth up the dead and quickeneth
them ; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will. Verily, verily, I
say unto you, he that heareth my word, and believeth on him that
seni me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation ;
but is passed from death unto life. Ye will not come unto me that
ye might have life." John 5:21, 24, 40. Thus, also, in the great,
discourse delivered after the feeding of the five thousand : " This is
the Father's will which hath sent me, that every one which seeth the
Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life : and I will raise
him up at the last day. I am that bread of life. This is the bread
which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and
not die. If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever : and the
bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of
the world. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of
the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. He that
eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in
him." John 6 : 39, 40, 48, 50, 51, 53, 56. Thus, also, at the Feast of
Tabernacles : "lam the light of the world : he that followeth me shall
not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life. Verily, verily,
I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death."
John 8:12, 51. Thus, also, at the Feast of Dedication : "My sheep
hear my voice, and they follow me, and I give unto them eternal life ;
and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of
my hand." John 10 :27, 28. And so also on the eve of his last and
greatest miracle : " I am the resurrection and the life : he that believ-
eth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live ; and whosoever
iiveth and believeth in me shall never die." Is there nothing strik
ing in it that, from first to last, running through all these diseouisr*
of our Saviour — to be found in every one of them without a single
156 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
exception— -this should be held out to us by our Lord himself as the
great end and object of his lifo and death — that we, who were all
dead in trespasses and sins, alienated from the life of God, should
6nd for these dead souls of ours a higher and everlasting life m
him?
The life of the soul lies, first, in the enjoyment of God's favor- - in
the light of his reconciled countenance shining upon it, in the ever-
lasting arms of his love and power embracing it. The great obstacle
to our entrance upon this life is conscious guilt, the sense of having
forfeited the favor, incurred the wrath of God. This obstacle Christ
has taken out of the way by dying for us, by bearing our sins in his
own body on the tree. There is redemption for us through his blood,
even the forgiveness of our sins. Not that the cross is a talisman
which works with a hidden, mystic, unknown, unfelt power — not that
the blood of the great sacrifice is one that cleanseth past guilt away,
leaving the old corruption untouched and unsubdued. Jesus is the
life in a farther and far higher sense than the opener of a free
way of access to God through the rent veil of his flesh. He is the
perennial source of that new life within, which consists in communion
with Gcd, likeness to God, in gratitude, in love, in peace, and joy,
and hope — in trusting, serving, submitting, enduring. This life hangs
ever and wholly upon him ; all good and gracious affections, every
pure and holy impulse, the desire and ability to be, to do, to suffer —
coming to us from him to whose light we bring our darkness, to
whose strength we bring our weakness, to whose sympathy our sor-
row, to whose fulness our emptiness. Our natural life, derived origi-
nally from another, is for a season dependent on its source, but that
dependence weakens and at last expires. The infant hangs helplessly
upon its mother at the first. But the infant grows into the child,
the child into the man — the two lives separate. Not such our spirit-
ual life. Coming to us at first from Christ, it comes equally and
entirely from him ever afterwards. It grows, but never away from
him. It gets firmer, more matured; but its greater firmness and
maturity it owes to closer contact with him — simpler and more entire
dependence on him, deeper and holier love to him. It is as the
branch is in the vine, having no life when parted from it ; and as a
child is in its parent, that believers are in Christ. There is but one
relationship, of Son to Father — one wholly unique — which fitly repre-
sents this union, which was employed by Christ himself to do so,
"That they all maybe one, as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee,
that they also may be one in us. I in them and thou in me, that they
may be made perfect in one." It is indeed but the infancy of that
THE EAISING OF LAZARUS. 457
life which lies in such oneness with the Son and the Father, that is
to be witnessed here on earth. Yet within that feeble infancy are
the germinating seeds of an endless, an ever-progressive, an inde-
structible existence, raised by its very nature above the dominion of
death ; bound by ties indissoluble to him who was dead and is alive
again, and liveth for evermore ; an existence destined to run on its
everlasting course, getting ever nearer and nearer, growing ever liker
and liker to him from whom it flows.
Amid the death-like torpor which hath fallen upon us, stripping
us of the desire and power to live wholly in God and wholly for God,
who would not wish to feel the quickening touch of the great life-
giver, Jesus Christ — to be raised to newness of life in him — to have
our life bound up with his for ever — hid with him in God ? This —
nothing less than this, nothing lower than this — is set before us.
Who would not wish to see and feel it realized in his present, his
future, his eternal existence ? Then, let us cleave to Christ, resolved
in him to live, desiring in him to die, that with him we may be raised
at last, at the resurrection, on the great day, to those heavenly places
where, free from all weakness, vicissitude, corruption, and decay, this
life shall be expanded and matured throughout the bright ages of an
unshadowed eternity.
XIV.
The Raising of Lazarus.*
It is not likely that Martha understood in its full meaning what
Christ had said about his being the Resurrection and the Life. So
far, however, as she did comprehend, she believed ; and so when Jesus
said to her, "Believest thou this?" — understanding that he had
spoken about himself, and wished from her some expression of her
faith — she said to him, "Yea, I believe that thou art the Christ, the
Son of God, which should come into the world." With crude ideas
of the character and offices they attributed to him, many were ready
to call Jesus the Christ, to believe that he was the Messias spoken of
by the prophets. Martha's confession went much farther than this:
she believed him to be also the Son of God, to be that for claiming
to be which the Jews had been ready to stone him, as one making
himself equal with God. It may have been, regarding him too much
» John 11 : 27-54.
158 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
as a mere man Laving power with God, that she had previously said,
"But I know that even now whatsoever thou wilt ask of God, God
will give it thee;" but now that her thoughts are concentrated upon
it, she tells out all the faith that is in her, and in so doing ranks
herself beside Peter and the very few who at that time could have
joined in the confession, "I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son
of the living God."
Had Mary and Lazarus not been in his thoughts Jesus might have
pronounced over Martha the same benediction that he did over Peter,
and said to her, "Blessed art thou, Martha, for flesh and blood hatli
not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven." As it
is, he simply accepts the good confession, and bids Martha go and
call her sister.
Mary had not heard at first of the Lord's coming, or, if she had,
was too absorbed in her sorrow to heed it. But now when Martha
whispers in her ear, "The Master is come and calleth for thee," she
rises and hastens out to where Jesus is, outside the village. No one
had followed Martha when she went out there. But there was such
an unusual quickness, such a fresh and eager excitement in this move-
ment of Mary, that those around her ran with her and followed, say-
ing, " She goeth unto the grave to weep there." Thus did she draw
along with her the large company that was to witness the great
miracle.
Once again in the Master's presence, Mary is overwhelmed with
emotion. She falls weeping at his feet; has nothing to say as she
looks up at him through her tears but what Martha had said before :
"Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had not died." Her
grief checks all further utterance. Nor has Jesus any thing to say.
Mary is weeping at his feet, Martha is weeping at his side, the Jews
are weeping all around. This is what death had done, desolating a
once happy home, rending with such bitter grief the two sisters'
hearts, melting into kindred sorrow the hearts of friends and neigh-
bors. The calm that had its natural home in the breast of the Re-
deemer is broken up: he grieves in spirit and is troubled. Too
heavy in heart himself, too troubled in spirit, as he stands with
hearts breaking and tears falling all around him, to have any
words of counsel or comfort for Mary such as he addressed to
Martha, he can only say, " Where have ye laid him ?" They say
to him, "Lord, come and see." He can restrain no longer. He
wept.
What shall we think or say of these tears of Jesus ? There were
some among those who saw him shed them, who, looking at them in
THE RAISING OF LAZARUS. 459
their first and simplest aspect — as tears shed over the grave of a
departed friend — said one to another, "Behold how he loved him!"
There were others not sharing so much in the sisters' grief, who were
at leisure to say, "Could not this man, which opened the eyes of the
blind, have caused that even this man should not have died?" 'P
he could have saved him, why did he not do it? He may weep now
himself: had it not been better that he had saved these two poor
sisters from weeping?' We take our station beside these men. With
the first we say, Behold how he pities ! See in the tears he sheds
what a singular sympathy with human sorrow there is within his
heart — a sympathy deeper and purer than we have ever elsewhere
seen expressed. To w r eep with others or for others is no unusual
thing, and carries with it no evidence of extraordinary tenderness of
spirit. It is what at some time or other of their lives all men have
done. But there is a peculiarity in the tears of Jesus that separates
them from all others — that gives them a new meaning and a new
power. For where is Jesus when he weeps? a few paces from
the tomb of Lazarus; and what is he about immediately to do?
to raise the dead man from the grave, and give him back to his
sisters. Only imagine that, gifted with such a power, you had gone
on such an errand, and stood on the very edge of its execution, would
not your whole soul be occupied with the great thing you were about
to do, the great joy you were about to cause ? You might see the
sisters of the dead one weeping, but, knowing how very soon you
were about to turn their grief into gladness, the sight would ouly
hasten you forward on your way. But though knowing what a per-
fect balm he was so soon to lay upon all the sorrow, Jesus shows
himself so sensitive to the simple touch of grief, that even in such
peculiar circumstances he cannot see others weeping without weep-
ing along with them. How exquisitely tender the sympathy man-
ifested in the tears that in such peculiar circumstances were shed !
Again we take our station beside the onlookers, and to the second
set of speakers we would say — he could have caused that this man
had not died. But his are no false tears, though shed over a calam-
ity he could have prevented. He allowed Lazarus to die, he allowed
his sisters to suffer all this woe, not that he loved them less, but
because he knew that for him, for them, for others, for us all, highei
ends were in this way gained than could have been accomplished bj
his cutting the illness short, and going from Bethabara to cur.-.
Little did the weeping sisters know what a place in the annals of
redemption the death and resurrection of their brother was to
occupy. How earnestly in the course of the illness did they pray
460 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
for his recovery ! How eagerly did they despatch thpir messenger tc
Jesus! A single beam of light fell on the darkness when the mes-
senger brought back as answer the words he had heard Jesus utter —
" This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the
Son of God might be glorified thereby." What other meaning could
they put upon the words, but that either their brother was to recover,
or Jesus was to interfere and heal him ? Their brother died, and all
the more bitterly because of their disappointment did they bemoaD
his loss. But what thought they when they got him back again—
what thought they when they heard of Christ's own death and resur-
rection — what thought they when they came to know, as they had
never known before, that Jesus was indeed the abolisher of death,
the bringer of life and immortality to light? Would they then have
wished that their brother had not died — that they had been saved
their tears, but lost the hallowed resurrection-birth of their brother
to his Lord, lost to memory the chiefest treasure that time gave to
carry with them into eternity ?
Groaning again in spirit, Jesus came to the grave. It was a cave,
and a stone covered the niche within which the body of the dead
was lying. Jesus said, "Take ye away the stone." The doing so
would at once expose the dead, and let loose the foul effluvium of the
advanced decomposition. The careful Martha, whose active spirit
ever busied itself with the outward and tangible side of things, at
once perceives this, and hastens to interpose a check. Gently, but
chidingly, the Lord said unto her, " Said I not unto thee, that, if thou
wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?" 'Was it
not told thee in the words brought back by thy messenger that this
sickness was to be for the glory of God — a glory waiting yet to be
revealed? Have I not been trying to awaken thy faith in myself, as
the resurrection and the life? Why think, then, of the existing state
of thy brother's body ? Why not let faith anticipate the future, and
put all such lower thoughts and cares away ? ' The rebuke was gently
given ; but given at such a time, and in such presence, it must have
fallen heavily upon poor Martha's heart.
And now the order is obeyed. Taking a hasty glance within, the
removers of the stone withdraw. Jesus stands before the open sepul-
chre. But all is not ready yet. There is to be a slowness, a solem-
nity in every step that shall wind up every spirit to the topmost point
of expectation. Jesus lifts his eyes to heaven and prays, not to ask
God to work the miracle, or give him power to do so. So might
Moses, or Elijah, or any other of the great miracle-workers of earlier
times have done, proclaiming thereby in whose name it was and bj
THE RAISING OF LAZARUS. 401
svLose power they wrought. Jesus never did so. He stands alone
in this respect. All that he did was done indeed in conjunction with
the Father. He was careful to declare that the Son did nothing of
himself, nothing independently. It was in faith, with prayer, that al!
his mighty works were wrought ; but the faith was as peculiar as th<*
prayer — both such as he alone could cherish and present. Ordina
illy the faith was hidden in his heart, the prayer was in secret, unntr
fcered and unheard. But now he would have it known how close was
the union between him and the Father. He would turn the ap-
proaching miracle into an open and incontrovertible evidence that he
was the Sent of the Father, the Son of God. And so, in words of
thanksgiving rather than of petition, he says, " Father, I thank thee
that thou hast heard me" — the silent prayer had already been heard
and answered — "And I knew that thou hearest me always," 'that thy
hearing is not peculiar to this case, for as I am always praying, so
thou art always answering' — "but because of the people which stand
by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me," lit no
more solemn manner could the fact of his mission from tho Father,
and of the full consent and continued cooperation of the Father with
him in all he said and did, be suspended upon the issue of the words
that next come from his lips: "And when he thus had spoken, he
cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth." The hour has come
for the dead to hear and live. At once, and at that summons, the
body lives, starts into life again, not as it had died, the life injected
into a worn and haggard frame. It gets back in a moment all its
healthful vigor. At once, too, and at that summons, from a dream-
less sleep that left it nothing to tell about the four days' interval, or
from a region the secrets of which it was not permitted to disclose,
the spirit returns to its former habitation. Lazarus rises and stands
erect. But he is bound hand and foot, a napkin is over his face and
across his eyes. So bound, as good as blind, he could take but a few
timid shuffling steps in advance. "Loose him," said Jesus, "and let
him go." They do it. He can see now all around. He can go
where he pleases. Shall we doubt that the first use he makes of
sight and liberty is to go and cast himself at the Redeemer's feet?
" Take ye away the stone," "Loose him, and let him go." Christ
could easily by the word of his great power have removed the stone,
untied the bandages. But he does not do so. There is to be no idle
expenditure of the Divine energy. What human hands are fit for,
human hands must do. The earthly and the heavenly, as in all
Christ's workings, blend harmoniously together. So is it still in
that spiritual world in which he still is working the wonders of his
462 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
grace, raising dead souls to life, and nourishing the life that is so
begotten.
It is not for us to quicken the spiritually dead. No human voice
has power to pierce the closed ear, to reach the dull, cold heart.
The voice of Jesus can alone do that. But there are stones of
obstruction which keep that voice from being heard. These we can
remove. The ignorant can be taught, the name of Jesus be made
Iraown, the glad tidings of salvation published abroad. And when at
the divine call the new life has entered into the soul, by how many
bonds and ligaments, prejudices of the understanding, old holds of
the affections, old habits of the life, is it hampered and hindered!
These, as cramping our own or others' higher life, we may help to
untie and fling away.
But the crowning lesson of the great miracle is the mingled exhi-
bition that it makes of the humanity and divinity of our Lord. No-
where, at no time in all his life, did he appear more perfectly human,
show himself more openly or fully to be one with us, our true and
tender elder brother, than when he burst into tears before the grave
of Lazarus. Nowhere, at no time, did he appear more divine than
when with the loud voice he cried, "Lazarus, come forth," and at the
voice the^dead arose and came forth. And it is just because there
meet in him the richness and the tenderness of an altogether human
pity and the fulness of a divine power, that he so exactly and so com-
pletely satisfies the deepest inward cravings of the human heart. In
our sins, in our sorrows, in our weaknesses, in our doubts, in om
fears, we need sympathy of others who have passed through the same
experience. We crave it. When we get it we bless the giver, for in
truth it does more than all things else. But there are many barriers
in the way of our obtaining it, and there are many limits which con-
fine it when it is obtained. Many do not know us. They are so dif-
ferently constituted, that what troubles us does not trouble them.
They look upon all our inward straggles and vexations as needless
and self-imposed, so that just in proportion to the speciality of our
trial is the narrowness of the circle from which we can look for any
true sympathy. But even were we to find the one in all the earth by
nature most qualified to enter into our feelings, how many are the
chances that we should find his sympathy preoccupied, to the full
engaged, without time or without patience to make himself so master
of all the circumstances of our lot, and all the windings of our
thoughts and our affections, as to enable him to feel with us and for
as, as he even might have done! But that which we may search the
Tvorld for without finding is ours in Jesus Christ. All impedimenta
THE RAISING OF LAZARUS. 46S
romoved, all limitations lifted off — how true, how tender, how con-
stant, how abiding is his brotherly sympathy — the sympathy of one
who knows our frame, who remembers we are dust, of one who knows
all about, all within us, and who is touched with a fellow-feeling of
our infirmities, "having himself been tempted in all things like as we
are." It is not simply the pity of God, with all its fulness and ten-
derness : that had not come so close to us, taken such a hold of ua
it is the sympathy of a brother-man that Jesus extends to us, free
from all the restrictions to which such sympathy is ordinarily sub-
jected.
But we need more than that sympathy ; we need succor. Besides
the heart tender enough to pity, we need the hand strong enough to
help, to save us. We not only want one to be with us and feel with
us in our hours of simple sorrow, we want one to be with us and aid
us in our hours of temptation and conflict, weakness and defeat — one
not only to be ever at our side at all times and seasons of this our
earthly pilgrimage, but to be near us then, to uphold us then, when
flesh and heart shall faint and fail ; to be the strength of our hearts
then, and afterwards our portion for ever. In all the universe there
is but one such. Therefore to him, our own loving, compassionate,
Almighty Saviour, let us cling, that softly in the bosom of his gentle
pity we may repose, and safely, by his everlasting arms, may for ever
be sustained.
Let us now resume the narrative. The raising of Lazarus was
too conspicuous a miracle, it had been wrought too near the city,
had been seen by too many witnesses, and had produced too palpable
results, not to attract the immediate and fixed attention of the Jewish
rulers. Within a few hours after its performance Jerusalem would
be filled with the report of its performance. A meeting of the San-
hedrim was immediately summoned, and sat in council as to what
should be done. No doubt was raised as to the reality of this or any
of the other miracles which Christ had wrought. They had been
done too openly to admit of that. But now, when many even of the
Jews of Jerusalem were believing in him, some stringent measures
must be taken to check this rising, swelling tide, or who could tell to
what it may carry them? There were divisions, however, in the
council. It was constituted of Pharisees and Sadducees, who had
been looking at Jesus all through with very different eyes. The
Pharisees, from the first, had hated him. He had made so little of
all their boasted righteousness, had exalted goodness and holiness of
heart and life so far above all ritualistic regularity, had simplified
religion so, and encouraged men, however sinful, to go directly to
464 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
God as their merciful Father, setting aside the pretensions of the
priesthood, and treating as things of little worth the labored theology
and learning of the schools, he had been so unsparing besides iE
exposing the avarice, the ambition, the sensuality that cloaked them •
selves in the garb of a precise and exclusive and fastidious religion-
ism, that they early felt that their quarrel with him was not to be
settled otherwise than by his death. Very early, on the occasion of
his second visit to Jerusalem, they had sought to slay him, at first
nominally as a Sabbath-breaker, then afterwards, and still more, as a
blasphemer.* In Galilee — to which he had retired to put himself
out of the reach of the Pharisees of the capital — their hostility pur-
sued him, till we read of the Pharisees and the Herodians then tak-
ing counsel together "how they might destroy him."f Once and
again, at the Feast of Tabernacles, and at the Feast of Dedication,
stones had been taken up to stone him to death, officers had been
sent to arrest him, and the resolution taken and announced, that
that if any man should confess that he was the Christ, he should be
excommunicated. But as yet no formal determination of the Sanhe-
drim had been made that he should be put to death. The reason for
this delay, for suffering Christ to go at large even for so long a time
as he did, was in all likelihood the dominance in the Sanhedrim of
the Sadducean element. The Sadducees had their own grounds for
disliking the person, the character, the teaching, the pretensions oi
Jesus, but they were not so vehement or so virulent in their persecu-
tion of him. Caring less about religious dogmas and observances
than the rival sect, they might have been readier to tolerate him as
an excited enthusiast; but now they also got frightened, for they
were the great supporters of the Eoman power, and the great fearers
of popular revolt. And so when this meeting of the Great Council
was called in haste, Pharisees and Sadducees found common ground
in saying to one another, "What do we? for this man does many
miracles. If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him ; and
the Eomans shall come and take away both our place and nation,"
Neither party believed that there was any chance of Jesus making a
successful revolt, and achieving by that success a liberation from the
Roman yoke, as it then lay upon them. The Pharisees, the secret
enemies of the foreigner, saw nothing in Jesus of such a warlike
leader as the nation longed for and required. The Sadducees, dread-
ing some outbreak, but utterly faithless as to any good issue coming
out of it, saw nothing before them as the result of such a movement
but the loss of such power as they were still permitted to exercise
* John 5 : 16-18 -f Mark 3 : 6.
THE KAISING OF LAZAKUS. 465
And so both combined against the Lord. But there was some loose
talking, some doubts were expressed bj men like Nicodemus, or
some feebler measures spoken of, till the high priest himself arose -
Caiaphas, the son-in-law of Annas, connected thus with that family in
which the Jewish pontificate remained for fifty years — four of the
sons, as well as the son-in-law of Annas, having, with some inter-
ruptions, enjoyed this dignity. All through this period, embracing
the whole of Christ's life from early childhood, Annas, the head of
this favored family, even when himself out of office, retained much of
its power, being consulted on all occasions of importance, and acting
as the president of the Sanhedrim. Hence it is that in the closing
scenes of our Lord's history Annas and Caiaphas appear as acting
conjunctly, each spoken of as high priest. Caiaphas, like the rest
of his family, like all the aristocracy of the temple, was a Sadducee ;
and the spirit both of the family and the sect was that of haughty
pride and a bold and reckless cruelty. Caiaphas cut the deliberations
short by saying impetuously and authoritatively to his colleagues,
" Ye know nothing at all, nor consider that it is expedient for us that
one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish
not." One life, the life of this Galilean, what is it worth? What
matters it, whether he be innocent or guilty, according to this or that
man's estimate of guilt or innocence; it stands in the way of the
national welfare. Better one man perish than that a whole nation
be involved in danger, it may be in ruin. The false, the hollow, the
unjust plea, upon which the life of many a good and innocent man,
guilty of nothing but speaking the plain and honest truth, has been
sacrificed, had all the sound, as coming from the lips of the high
priest, of a wise policy, a consultation for the nation's good. Pleased
with themselves as such good patriots, and covering with this disguise
all the other grounds and reasons for the resolution, it was deter-
mined that Jesus should be put to death. It remained only to see
how most speedily and most safely it could be accomplished.
Unwittingly, in what he said Caiaphas had uttered a prophecy,
had announced a great and central truth of the Christian faith. Pie
had given to the death determined on too limited a range, as if it
had been for that nation of the Jews alone that Jesus was to die.
But the Evangelist takes up, expounds, and expands his words as
carrying with them the broad significance that not for that natioa
only was he to die, but that by his death he " should gather together
in one the children of God that were scattered abroad." Strange
ordering of Providence, that here at the beginning and there at the
close of our Lord's passion — here in the Sanhedrim, there upon the
Life of Clnltt 30
4(56 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
cross — here from the Jewish high priest, there from the Roniai:
governor — words should come by which the unconscious utterera
conspired in proclaiming the priestly and the kingly authority »nd
office of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ !
OUTLINE STUDIES.
That Jesus might have time to complete his work, he went from
the vicinity of Jerusalem to a place called Ephraim, in the northeast
part of Judea, where he remained for a few weeks in retirement. When
the Passover drew near he traveled northward by a circuitous route,
then eastward along the border of Samaria and Galilee, and crossed the
Jordan into Peraea. From this point began our Lord's final journey
to Jerusalem. At a certain village ten lepers were healed. The par-
ables of the Unjust Judge and of the Pharisee and the Publican were
spoken. A decisive answer to questions about divorce was given.
Then mothers brought their children to Christ and he blessed them.
Christ was next visited by the young man who had large possessions,
but would not part from them that he might win a place in the kingdom
of heaven. The warning is given against trusting in riches. James
and John and their mother, Salome, present their request for places
of honor for the two apostles in the new kingdom which they judge
is soon to be established.
Once more crossing the Jordan, Jesus arrives at Jericho, where he
heals blind Bartimeus, and brings Zaccheus to repentance and reforma-
tion.
Proceeding on his way, the Saviour arrives at Bethany, and with
his disciples is welcomed in the home of Martha, Mary, and Lazarus.
A supper is arranged and Mary uses the occasion to anoint Christ
with the costly nard, and receives the Lord's approval when her deed
of love is challenged. Even to some in our day it might appear as if
the words with which our Lord commends the service of Mary are
extreme, but her act is only another example of that quality of service
that moved the heart of Christ in an unwonted degree whenever it
occurred during his ministry — that abandon of faith seen in the cen-
turion who came to him at Capernaum; that self-effacing penitence
and hope with which the sinful woman at the feast knelt at his feet;
that grandeur of confession with which Peter exclaimed, " Thou art
the Christ, the Son of the living God." So the anointing by Mary
is the expression of an absolute love— the very love which Christ came
to kindle in human hearts — going out to the purity, the beauty, the
helpfulness, the tenderness, the sacrificial pity, the holiness of the
OUTLINE STUDIES. 466a
divine nature as incarnated in his own person. Mary is perhaps the
first one in whom this love in its completeness of response to the spiritual
Christ is seen, and as such she becomes a file-leader. A St. Paul, a
St. John, a Persis, a Phoebe may follow, but Mary of Bethany is the
forerunner, and of her as such Christ says: " She hath done what she
could. . . This that she hath done shall be a memorial of her."
PART III. MAIN MINISTRY IN JUDEA AND PERiEA.
Study 15. Second Period of Per^ean Ministry and
Arrival at Bethany.
(1) Christ's sojourn at Ephraim 4666
(2) Course into Per.ea 4665
(3) Cleansing of ten lepers 4666, 467
a. They call for mercy and help 4666
6. Christ directs them to go and show themselves to the priests 4666
c. They find that they are cleansed 467
d. One, a Samaritan, returns to give thanks 467
(4) Question as to when the kingdom of God will come 467
a. Parable of the Unjust Judge 467
6. Parable of the Pharisee and the Publican 467
(5) Question as to divorce 467, 468
a. Moses permitted it because of hardness of heart 467
6. The higher standard of the new kingdom 467, 468
(6) Christ and the children 468-470
a. Mothers bring children to him 468
6. The disciples rebuke them 468
c. Jesus receives the children and blesses them 468
d. States that of such is the kingdom of heaven 468
e. View as to their salvation 468-470
(7) Christ and the rich young man 470-475
a. The man's desire and attitude 470-472
6. Christ's test and direction 472, 473
c. The man's failure and sad departure 473
d. Christ's general statement concerning riches 473-475
(8) Jericho and Jesus' works 475-4P4
a. History of the region 475, 470
6. Jesus' bearing and view of the future 476, 477
c. Request of James and John 477-479
d. Healing of blind Bartimeus 479-482
e. Conversion of Zaccheus 481- J 84
(9) Journey to and arrival at Bethany 484-486
a. Parable of the Pounds given 484
6. Thoughts of the Passover multitudes 485
c. Jesus in the Bethany home 485, 486
4666 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
(10) Anointing by Mary 486-491
a. Supper in the house of Simon the leper 486
b. Mary anoints Christ 4gg 437
c. Criticism of her act 487 4gg
d. Jesus' commendation and prophecy 488-491
XV.
The Last Journey through Per^ea (East of the
Jordan) : The Ten Lepers — The Coming of the
Kingdom — The Question of Divorce — Little Chil-
dren BROUGHT TO HlM The YOUNG RuLER *
Cheist's stay at Bethany on the occasion of his raising Lazarus
from the dead must have been a very short one. The impression and
effect of the great miracle was so immediate and so great that no
time was lost by the rulers in calling together the council and com-
ing to their decision to put Jesus to death. Hearing of this, no time
on his part would be lost in putting himself, now only for a short
time, beyond their reach. He retired in the first instance to a part
of the country near the northern extremity of the wilderness of Judea,
into a city called Ephraim, identified by many with the modern town
of Taiyibeh, which lies a few miles northeast of Bethel. After some
days of rest in this secluded spot, spent we know not how, the Pass-
over drew on, and Jesus arose to go up to it. He took a circuitous
course, passing eastward along the border-line between Galilee and
Samaria, which lay not more than half a day's journey from Ephraim,
descending into the valley of the Jordan, crossing the river, entering
once more into Peraea, travelling through it southward to Jericho.
It was during this, the last of all his earthly journeys, that as he
entered into a certain village there met him ten men that were lepers,
who stood afar off, as the law required ; but not wishing to let him
pass without a trial made of his grace and power, lifted up theii
voices, and said, " Jesus, Master, have mercy on us." " Go show
yourselves unto the priests," was all that Jesus said. He gave this
order, and passed on. The first thing that the leper who knew or
believed that the leprosy had departed from him had to do, was to
submit himself for inspection to the priesthood, that his cure might,
be authenticated, and he be formally relieved from the restraints
under which he had been laid. And this is w T hat these ten men are
* Luke 17 : 11-37, 18 : 15-27 : Matt ^ • ^26 ; Mark 10 : 1-27.
THE LAST JOURNEY THROUGH PER^EA. 467
bidden now to do, while as yet no sign of the removal of the disease
appears. Whether they all had a firm faith from the first that they
would be cured we may well doubt. Perhaps there was but one
among them who had such faith. They all, however, obey the order
that had been given ; it was at least worth trying whether anything
sould come out of it, and as they went they were all cleansed. The
moment that the cure was visible, one of them, who was a Samaritan,
ere he went forward to the priest, went back to Jesus, glorifying God
with a loud voice, and falling at Christ's feet to give him thanks.
The other nine went on, had their healing in due course authen-
ticated, returned to their families and friends, but inquired not for
their deliverer, nor sought him out to thank him. The contrast was
one that Christ himself thought fit to notice. " Were there not ten
cleansed," he said, " but where are the nine ? There are not found
that returned to give glory to God, save this stranger. And he said
unto him, Arise, go thy way, thy faith hath made thee whole." But
now once more the Pharisees betake themselves to their congenial
work, asking him when the kingdom of God should come. He cor-
rects their errors, gives them solemn warnings as to a coming of the
Son of Ma»n, in whose issues the men ©f that generation should be
very disastrously involved, adding the two parables of the Unjust
Judge and of the Pharisee and the Publican. Once more, however,
these inveterate enemies return to the assault. At an earlier period
they had sought in his own conduct, or in that of his disciples, to
find ground of accusation. Baffled in this, they try now a more
insidious method, to which we find them having frequent recourse
towards the close of our Lord's ministry. They demand his opinion
upon the vexed question of divorce. The two great schools of their
rabbis differed in their interpretation of the law of Moses upon this
point. Which side would Jesus take ? Decide as he may, it would
embroil him in the quarrel. To their surprise he shifted the ground
of the whole question from the only one upon which they rested it,
the authority of Moses ; told them in effect that they were wrong in
thinking that because Moses, or God through Moses, tolerated cer-
tain practices, that therefore these practices were absolutely right
and universally and throughout all time to be observed — furnishing
thereby a key to the Divine legislation for the Israelites, which we
have been somewhat slow to use as widely as we should ; told them
that it was because of the hardness of their hearts, to prevent greater
mischiefs that would have followed a purer and stricter enactment,
that the Israelites had been permitted to put away their wives,
(divorce allowed thus, as polygamy had been,) but that from the
468 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
beginning it had not been so, nor should it be so under the new
economy that he was ushering in, in which, save in a single case, the
marriage tie was indissoluble.
In happy contrast with all such insidious attempts to entangle
him in his talk was the next incident of his last journey through
Peraea. They brought little children — infants — to him. It is not
said precisely who brought them, but can we doubt that it was the
mothers of the children? They brought their little ones to Jesus
that he might touch them, put his hands upon them, pray for and
bless them. Some tinge of superstition there may have been in this,
some idea of a mystic benefit to be conveyed even to infancy by the
touch and the blessing of Jesus. But who will not be ready to for-
give the mothers here, though this were true, as we think of the fond
regard and deep reverence they cherished towards him? They sec
him passing through their borders. They hear it is a farewell visit
he is paying. These little babes of theirs shall never live to see and
know T how good, how kind, how holy a one he is ; but it would be
something to tell them of when they grew up, something that they
might be the better of all their lives afterwards, if he would but
touch them and pray over them. And so they come, bringing their
infants m their arms, first telling the disciples what they want. Tc
them it seems a needless if not impertinent intrusion upon theii
Master's graver labors. What good can children so young as these
get from the Great Teacher ? Why foist them upon the notice and
care of one who has so much weightier things in hand? Without
consulting then- Master, they rebuke the bringers of the children, and
would have turned them at once away. Jesus saw it, and he was
" much displeased." There was more than rudeness and discourtesy
in the conduct of his disciples. There was ignorance, there was un-
belief; it was a dealing with infants as if they had no part or share
as such in his kingdom. The occasion was a happy one — perhaps
the only one that occurred — for exposing their ignorance, rebuking
their unbelief, and so, after looking with displeasure at his disciples,
Jesus said to them, "Suffer the little children to come unto aae, and
forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven." We take the
last words here in the simplest and most obvious sense, as implying
that the kingdom of heaven belongs to infants, is in a measure made
up of them. It is quite true that immediately after having said this
about the infants Jesus had a cognate word to say to the adults
around him. He had to tell them that " whosoever should not
receive the kingdom of God as a little child should not enter therein."
But that was not said barely and alone as an explanation of his
'Of Such is the Kingdom of Heaven.
LITTLE CHILDREN BROUGHT TO HIM. 469
former speech—was not said to take all meaning out of that speech
as having any reference to the little children that were then actually
in his presence. It might be very true, and a very needful thing for
us to know, that we must be in some sense like to them before we
can enter into the kingdom; but that did not imply that they must
become like to us ere they can enter it. If all that Jesus meant had
been that of suchlike, that is, of those who, in some particular, resemble
little children, is the kingdom of heaven, we can see much less appro-
priateness in the rebuke of the disciples, and in the action of the
Lord which followed immediately upon his use of the expression —
his taking the little children up into his arms and blessing them.
We accept, then, the expression as implying not simply that of such-
like, but of them is the kingdom of heaven. It may be thought that
a shade of uncertainty still hangs over it. John Newton uses the
cautious language, "I think it at least highly probable that in those
words our Lord does not only, if at all, here intimate the necessity of
our becoming as little children in simplicity, as a qualification with-
out which (as he expressly declares in other places) we cannot entef
into his kingdom, but informs us of a fact, that the number of infants
who are effectually redeemed to God by his blood, so greatly exceeds
the aggregate of adult believers, that his kingdom may be said to
consist of little children." It is not necessary, however, while adopt-
ing generally the interpretation which Newton thought so highly
probable, to press it so far, or to infer that the kingdom is said to be
of such because they constitute the majority of its members; enough
to receive the saying as carrying with it the consoling truth, that
to infants as such the kingdom of heaven belongeth, so that if in
infancy they die, into that kingdom they enter. We would be most
unwilling to regard this gracious utterance of our Lord, and the
gracious act by which it was followed up, as implying anything less
than this.
It is not, however, upon any single saying of our Lord that we
ground our belief that those who die in infancy are saved; it is upon
the whole genius, spirit, and object of the great redemption. There
is indeed a mystery in the death of infants. No sadder nor more
mysterious sight upon this earth than to see a little unconscious babe
struggling through the agonies of dissolution, bending upon us those
strange imploring looks which we long to interpret but cannot, which
tell only of a suffering we cannot assuage, convey to us petitions for
help to which we can give no reply. But great as the mystery is
which wraps itself around the death, still greater would be that
attending the resurrection of infants if any of them perish. The
470 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
resurrection is to bring to all an accession of weal or woe. In that
resurrection infants are to share. Can we believe that, without an
opportunity given of personally receiving or rejecting Christ, they
shall be subjected to a greater woe than would have been theirs had
there been no Kedeemer and no redemption? Then to them his
coming into the world had been an unmitigated evil. Who can
believe it to be so? Who will not rather believe, that even as with-
out sharing in the personal transgression of the first natural head of
our race, without sinning after the similitude of Adam's transgression,
they became involved in death; even so, though not believing here —
the chance not given them — they will share in the benefit of that
life which the second, the spiritual Head of our race, has brought in
and dispenses? "Your little ones," said the Lord to ancient Israel,
speaking of the entrance into the earthly land of promise — "Your
little ones which ye said should be a prey, and your children which
in that day had no knowledge between good and evil, they shall go
in thither." And of that better land into which for us Jesus as the
forerunner has entered, shall we not believe that our little ones, who
died before they had any knowledge between good and evil, shall go
in thither, go to swell the number of the redeemed, go to raise it to
a vast majority of the entire race, mitigating more than we can well
reckon the great mystery of the existence here of so much sin, and
suffering, and death ?
Setting forth afresh, and now in all likelihood about to pass out
of that region, there met him one who came running in all eagerness,
as anxious not to lose the opportunity, and who kneeled to him with
great reverence as having the most profound respect for him as a
righteous man, and who said, " Good Master, what good thing shall
I do, that I may inherit eternal life?" Jesus might at once and
without any preliminary conversation have laid on him the injunction
that he did at the last, and this might equally have served the final
end that the Lord had in view; but then we should have been left in
ignorance as to what kind of man he was, and how it was that the
injunction was at once so needful and so appropriate. It is by help
of the preparatory treatment that we are enabled to see farther than
•we should otherwise have done into the character of this petitioner
He was young, he was wealthy, he was a ruler of the Jews. Better
than this, he was amiable, he was virtuous, had made it from the
first a high object of ambition to be just and to be generous, to use
the advantages of his position to win in a right way the favor of his
fellow-men. But notwithstanding, after all the successful attempts
of his past life, there was a restlessness, a dissatisfaction in his heart.
THE YOUNG RULER, 471
He had not reached the goal. He heard Jesus speak of eternal life,
something evidently far higher than anything he had yet attained,
and he wondered how it was to be secured. Nothing doubting but
that it must be along the same track that he had hitherto been pur-
suing, but by some extra work of extraordinary merit, he comes to
Jesus with the question, " Good Master, what good thing shall I do,
that I may inherit eternal life?" Jesus saw at once that he was put-
ting all upon moral goodness, some higher virtue to be reached by
his own effort entitling him to the eternal life. He saw that he was
so fully possessed with this idea that it regulated even his conception
of Christ's own personal character, whom he was disposed to look
upon rather as a preeminently virtuous man than one having any
peculiar relationship to God. Checking him, therefore, at the very
first — taking exception to the very form and manner of his address,
he says, "Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one,
that is, God."
Endeavoring thus to raise his thoughts to the true source of all
real goodness, rather than to say anything about his own connection
with the Father, which it is no part of his present object to speak
about, Jesus takes him first upon his own ground. There need be
no talk about any one particularly good thing, that behooved to be
done, till it w~as seen whether the common acknowledged precepts of
God's law had been kept. " Thou knowest the commandments, Do
not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false
witness, Defraud not, Honor thy father and thy mother." As the
easiest instrument of conviction, as the one that lay entirely in the
very region to which all this youth's thoughts and efforts had been
confined, Jesus restricted himself to quoting the precepts of the
second table of the law, and says nothing in the meantime about the
first. The young man, hearing the challenge, listens to the precepts
as they are detailed, and promptly, without apparently a momentary
misgiving, he answers, " All these have I observed from my youth."
There was no doubt great ignorance, great self-deception in this reply.
He knew but little of any one of these precepts in its true significance,
in all the strictness, spirituality, and extent of its requirements, who
coiald venture on any such assertion. Yet there was sincerity in the
answer, and it pointed to a bygone life of singular external propriety,
and that the fruit not so much of constraint as of natural amiabieness
and conscientiousness. As he gave this answer, Jesus beholding
him loved him. It was new and refreshing to the Saviour's eye to
see such a specimen as this of truthfulness and purity, of all that
was morally lovely and of good report among the rulers of the Jews.
472 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Here was no hypocrite, no fanatic, here was one who had not learned
to wear the garb of sanctimoniousness as a cover for all kinds of self-
indulgence ; here was one free from the delusion that the strict
observance of certain formulas of devotion would staud instead of
the weightier matters of justice and of charity ; here was one who s<}
far had escaped the contagion of his age and sect, who was not seek-
ing to make clean the outside of the cup and the platter, but was
really striving to keep himself from all that was wrong, and to be
towards his fellow-men all that, as he understood it, God's law
required. Jesus looked upon this man and loved him.
But the very love he bore him prompted Jesus to subject him to
a treatment bearing in many respects a likeness to that to which he
subjected Nicodemus. With not a little, indeed, that was different,
there was much that was alike in the two rulers — the one who came
to Jesus by night at the beginning of his ministry in Judea ; the one
who now comes to him by day at the close of his labors in Persea ;
both honest, earnest men, seekers after truth, and lovers of it in a
fashion to9, but both ignorant and self-deceived ; Nicodeinus' error
rather one of the head than of the heart, flowing from an entire mis-
conception of the very nature of Christ's kingdom ; the young ruler's
one of the heart rather than of the head, flowing from an inordinate,
an idolatrous attachment to his worldly possessions. In either case
Christ's treatment was quick, prompt, decisive, laying the axe at on&e
at the root of the evil. Beneath all the pleasing show of outward
moralities Christ detected in the young ruler's breast a lamentable
want of any true regard to God, any recognition of his supreme and
paramount claims. His heart, his trust, his treasure, were in earthly,
not in heavenly things. He needed a sharp lesson to teach him this,
to lay bare at once the true state of things within. Christ was toe
kind and too skilful a physician to apply this or that emollient that
might have power to aHay a symptom or two of the outward irrita-
tion. At once he thrusts the probe into the very heart of the wound.
" One thing thou lackest : go thy way," said he, at once assuming his
proper place as the representative of God and of his claims — " go thy
way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor ; and come, take
up the cross, and follow me." The one thing lacking was not the
renunciation of his property in bestowing it upon the poor. It was a
supreme devotedness to God, to duty — a willingness to give up any
tning, to give up every thing where God required it to be given up,
when the holding of it was inconsistent with fidelity to him. This
was the one tiling lacking. And instead of proclaiming his fatal defi-
eiency in this primary requirement, without which there could be no
THE YOUNG RULER. 473
true obedience rendered to any part of the Divine law, Christ embod-
ies the claim which he knew the young ruler was unprepared to honor,
in that form which struck directly at the idol of his heart, and required
its instant and absolute dethronement.
Not for a moment, then, can w T e imagine that in speaking to him
as he did, Jesus was issuing a general command, or laying down a
universal condition of the Christian discipleship, or that he was even
holding up the relinquishment of earthly possessions as an act of pre-
eminent meritoriousness, which all strivers after Christian perfection
should set before them as the summit to be reached. There is noth-
ing of all this here. It is a special treatment of a special case.
Christ's object being to frame and to apply a decisive touchstone or
test whereby the conditiou of that one spirit might be exposed, he
suited with admirable skill the test to the condition. Had that con-
dition been other than it was, the test employed had been different.
Had it been the love of pleasure, or the love of power, or the love of
fame, instead of the love of money that had been the ruling passion,
he would have framed his order so that obedience to it would have
demanded the crucifixion of the ruling passion, the renunciation of
the one cherished idol. The only one abiding universal rule that we
are entitled to extract from this dealing of our Lord with this appli-
cant being this : that in coming to Christ, in taking on the yoke of
the Christian discipleship, it must be in the spirit of an entire readi-
ness to part with all that he requires us to relinquish, and to allow no
idol to usurp that inward throne that of right is his.
Christ's tre-atment, if otherwise it failed, was in one respect emi-
nently successful. It silenced, it saddened, it sent away. No answer
was attempted. No new question was raised. The demand was
made in such broad, unmitigated, unambiguous terms, that the young
ruler, conscious that he had never felt before the extent or pressure
of such a demand, and that he was utterly unprepared to meet it,
turned away disappointed and dissatisfied. Jesus saw him go, let
him go, followed him with no importunities to return and to recon-
sider. It was not the manner of the Saviour to be importunate — you
do not find in him any great urgency or iteration of appeal. When
once in any case enough is said or done, the individual dealt with is
left to his own free-will. Gazing after this young ruler as he depart-
ed, Jesus then looked round about, and said to his disciples, "How
\.ardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God T
The disciples were astonished at these words, as well they might be
What ! was the ease or the difficulty of entering into this kingdom
to bo measured by the little or by the more of this world's goods that
474 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
each man possessed ? A strange premium this on poverty, as strange
a penalty on wealth. Jesus notices the surprise that his saying had
created, and, aware of the false track along which his disciples'
thoughts were running, in a way as affectionate as it was instructive
proceeded to explain the real meaning of what he had just said,
■Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into
the kingdom of God !" It is not the having but the trusting that
creates the difficulty. It is not the kind or the quantity of the
wealth possessed, but the kind or quantity of the attachment that is
lavished upon it. The love of the penny may create as great impedi-
ment as the love of the pound. Nor is it our wealth alone that oper-
ates in this way, that raises a mighty obstacle in the way of entering
into the kingdom. It is any thing else than God and Christ upon
which the supreme affection of the spirit is bestowed. A new light
dawns upon the disciples' minds as they listen to and begin to com-
prehend the explanation that their Master now has given, and see
the extent to which that explanation goes. They were astonished at
the first, but now the astonishment is more than doubled ; for if it
indeed be true, that before any individual of our race can cross the
threshold of the kingdom, such a shift of the whole trust and confi-
dence of the heart must take place — if every earthly living creature-
attachment must be subordinated to the love of God and of Jesus
Christ his Son, who then can be saved ? for who can effect this great
revolution within his own heart, who can take the dearest idol he has
known and cast it down in the dust, who can lay hand upon the usur-
per and eject him, who can raise the rightful owner of it to the throne?
Astonished out of measure, the disciples say among themselves, " Who
then can be saved?" Is the question needless or inappropriate ? Now
is the time, if they have fallen into any mistake, if they are taking too
dark, too gloomy views of the matter, if there be aught of error or of
exaggeration in the conceptions out of which this question springs —
now is the time for Jesus to rectify the error, to remove the miscon-
ception. Does he do so ? Nay, but assuming that it is even so — as
difficult to be saved as they imagine — his reply is, " With man it is
impossible, but not with God, for with God all things are possible."
Taught then by our Lord himself to know what all true entering into
his kingdom implies and presupposes, let us be well assured that to be
saved in his sense of the word is no such easy thing as many fancy,
fche difficulty not lying in any want of willingness on his part to save
us— not in any hinder ance whatever lying there without. All such
outward impediments have been, by his own gracious hand, and by
the work of his dear Son our Saviour removed. The difficulty lies
JESUS AT JEEICHO. 475
within, in our misplaced affections, in our stubborn and obstinate
wills, in hearts that will not let go their hold of other things to clasp
him home to them as their only satisfying good. Do you feel the diffi-
culty.— the moral impossibility of this hinderance being taken away by
yourselves? Then will you pray to him with wkom this, as e^verj
thing, is possible, that he may turn the possibility into reality. He
has done so in the case of multitudes as weak, as impotent as you.
He will do it unto you if you desire that it be done, and commit the
doing of it into his hands.
XYI.
Jesus at Jericho — The Request of the 3ons of
Zebedee.*
No district of the Holy Land is more unlike what it once was and
what it still might be than that in which Jericho, the city of palms,
once stood. Its position, commanding the two chief passes up to the
hill country of Judea and Samaria, the depth and fertility of its well-
watered soil, and the warmth of its tropical climate, early indicated
it as the site of a city which should not only be the capital of the
surrounding territory, but the protection of all western Palestine
against invaders from the east. Joshua found it so when he crossed
the Jordan : and as his first step towards the conquest of the country
which lay beyond, laid siege to a city which had walls broad enough
to have houses built upon them, and whose spoil when taken, its gold
and its silver, its vessels of brass and of iron, its goodly Babylonish
garments, bore evidence of affluence and of traffic. No town in all
the territory which the Israelites afterwards acquired westward of
Jordan could compete with Jericho. It fell, was reduced to ruins,
and the curse of Joshua pronounced upon the man who attempted to
raise again its walls, t In the days of Aliab that attempt was made,
and though the threatened evil fell upon the maker, the city rose
* Matt. 20 :17 34 ; Mark 10 : 2-52 ; Luke 18 : 35-43, 20 : 2-10.
f Within two miles of it, sharing in all its great natural advantages, stood Gil-
gal, the first encampment of the Israelites, where the ark stood till its removal to
Shiloh, which we read of as one of the stations to which Samuel resorted in ad-
ministering justice throughout the country, where the tribes so often met in the
days of Saul, to which the men of Judah went down to welcome David back
again to Jerusalem.
i7Q THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
from its ruins to enter upon another stage of progressive prosperity,
which reached its highest point when Herod the Great selected it as
one of his favorite resorts, beautified it with towers and palaces, be-
coming so attached to it that, feeling his last illness to have come
upon him, he retired there to die. Soon after his death the town was
plundered, and some of its finest buildings were destroyed. These,
however, were speedily restored to all their original splendor by
Archelaus, and as he left it Josephus has described it — its stately
buildings rising up among groves of palm-trees miles in length, with
gardens scattered round, in which all the chief flowers and fruits of
eastern lands grew up in the greatest luxuriance. The rarest and
most precious among them, the balsam, a treasure "worth its own
weight in silver, for which kings made war,"* "so that he," says
the Jewish historian, as he warms in his recital of all its glories, "he
Avho should pronounce the place to be divine would not be mistaken,
wherein is such plenty of trees produced as is very rare, and of the
most excellent sort. And, indeed, if we speak of these other fruits,
it will not be easy to light on any climate in the habitable earth that
can well be compared to it." And such as Josephus has described
was Jericho and the country round when Christ's eye rested on them,
in descending into the valley of the Jordan ; and above the tops of
the palm-trees, and the roofs of the palaces, he saw the trace of the
road that led up to Jerusalem. None besides the twelve had gone
with him into the retreats of Ephraim and Peraea. But now he is on
the track of the companies from the north, who are going up to the
Passover, that is to be celebrated at the close of the following week.
The time, the company, the road, all serve to bring up to the Saviour's
thoughts events that are now so near, to him of such momentous im-
port. A spirit of eager impatience to be baptized with the impending
baptism seizes upon him, and gives a strange quickness and a forward-
ness to his movements. His talk, his gait, his gestures all betoken
how absorbed he is ; the eye and thought away from the present, from
all around, fixed upon some future, the purport of which has wonder-
fully excited him. His hast}' footsteps carry him on before his fellow-
travellers. "Jesus went before them," St. Mark tells us, "and they
were amazed; and as they followed they were afraid." There was
that in his aspect, attitude, and actions that filled them with wonder
and with awe. It was not long till an explanation was offered them.
He took the twelve aside, and once again, as twice before, but now
with still greater minuteness and particularity of detail, told them
what was about to happen within a few days at Jerusalem : how he
* Martineau.
JESUS AT JERICHO. 477
waa to be delivered into the hands of the Jewish rulers, and how they
were to deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles, how he was to be
mocked and scourged, and spit upon and crucified, till all things that
were written by the prophets concerning him should be accomplished
and how on the third he was to rise again. Every thing was told sc
plainly that we may well wonder that any one could have been at any
loss as to Christ's meaning ; but the disciples we are told, " under-
stood none of these things, and the sayings were hid from them,
neither knew they the thing which was spoken." This only proves
what a blinding power preconception and misconception have in
hiding the simplest things told in the simplest language — a blinding
power often exercised over us now as to the written, as it was then
exercised over the apostles as to their Master's spoken words. The
truth is, that these men were utterly unprepared at the time to take
in the real truth as to what was to happen to their Master. They
had made up their minds, on the best of evidence, that he was the
Messiah. He had himself lately confirmed them in that faith. But
they had their own notions of the Messiahship. With these such suf-
ferings and such a death as were actually before Jesus were utterly
inconsistent. They could be but figurative expressions, then, that he
had employed, intended, perhaps, to represent some severe struggle
with his adversaries through which he had to pass before his king-
dom was set up and acknowledged.
One thing alone was clear — that the time so long looked forward
to had come at last. This visit to Jerusalem was to witness the erec-
tion of the kingdom. All other notions lost in that, the thought of
the particular places they were to occupy in that kingdom entered
again into the hearts of two of the apostles — that pair of brothers
who, from early adherence, and the amount of sacrifice they had
made, and the marked attention that on more than one occasion
Jesus had paid to them, might naturally enough expect that if special
favors were to be dispensed to any, they would not be overlooked.
James and John tell their mother Salome, who has met them by the
way, all that they have lately noticed in the manner of their Master,
and all that he has lately spoken, pointing to the approaching pass-
over as the season when the manifestation of the kingdom was to bo
made. Mother and sons agree to go to Jesus with the request that
in his kingdom and glory the one brother should sit upon his right
hand and the other upon his left, a request that in all likelihood took
its particular shape and form from what Jesus had said but a few
days before, when, in answer to Peter's question, "Behold, we have
forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore '?" And
478 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Jesus said unto them, "Verily I say unto you, That ye which have fol
lowed me in the regeneration, when the Son of man shall sit in the
throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the
twelve tribes of Israel." Matt. 19 : 27, 28. What could these thrones,
this judging be? Little wonder that the apostles' minds were set
a speculating by what still leaves us, after all our speculating, about
as much in the dark as ever. But while Salome and James
and John were proffering their request, and trying to preengage
the places of highest honor, where was Peter? It had not come
into Ms thought to seek a private interview with his Master for
such a purpose. He had no mother by his side to fan the flame that
way as ready to kindle in his as in any of their breasts. That with-
out any thought of one whose natural claims were as good as theirs,
James and John should have gone to Jesus and made the requesl
they did, satisfies us at least of this, that it was not the understand-
ing among the twelve that when the Lord had spoken to Peter as he
did after his good confession, he had assigned to him the primacy, or
indeed any particular preeminence, over the rest.
" Ye know not what ye ask." They did it ignorantly, and so far
they obtain mercy of the Lord. What it was to be placed on his
right and on his left in the scenes that awaited him in Jerusalem, two
nt least of the three petitioners, John and Salome, shall soon know
as they stand gazing upon the central cross of Calvary. "Can ye
drink of the cup that I drink of? and be baptized with the baptism
that I am baptized with ? They say, We can." From this reply it
would appear that the disciples understood the Lord as asking them
whether they are prepared to drink along with him some cup of sor-
row that was about soon to be put into his hands, to be baptized
along with him in some baptism of fire to which he was about to be
subjected. They are prepared, they think that they can follow him,
they are willing to take their part in whatever suffering such follow-
ing shall entail. Through all the selfishness, and the ambition, and
the great ignorance of the future that their request revealed, there
shone out in this prompt and no doubt perfectly sincere and honest
reply, a true and deep attachment to their Master, a readiness to
suffer with him or for him. And he is far quicker to recognize the
one than to condemn the other. "Ye shall indeed drink of the cup
that I drink of ; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall
ye be baptized." 'You, James, shall be the first among the twelve
that shall seal your testimony with your blood. You, John, shall
have the longest if not the largest experience of what the bearing of
the cross shall bring w r ith it. But to sit on my right and on my left
JESUS AT JERICHO. 479
in my kingdom and my glory, as"k me not for that honor as if it were
a thing in the conferring of which I am at liberty to consult my own
individual will or taste or humor. It is not mine so to dispense. It
is mine to give, but onlj to those for whom it is prepared of my
Father, and who by the course of discipline through which he shall
pass them shall be duly prepared for it.'
James and John have to be content with such reply. Their apj li-
cation, though made to Christ when alone, soon after became known
to others, and excites no small stir among them. Which of them
indeed may cast the first stone at the two ? They had all been quar-
relling among themselves not long before, as to which of them should
be greatest. And they shall all ere long be doing so again. Christ's
word of rebuke as he hears of this contention is for all as well as for
James and John. He tells us that no such kind of authority and
power as is practised in earthly government — the authority of men,
rank, or power carrying it dictatorially and tyrannically over subjects
and dependants — is to be admitted among his disciples; greatness
among them being a thing to be measured not by the amount of
power possessed, but by the amount of service rendered, by their
greater likeness to the Son of man, "who came not to be minis-
tered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many."
The contention is thus momentarily hushed, to break out again, whet
it shall receive a still more impressive rebuke.
Jesus and his disciples, and a great multitude of people who had
joined themselves to him by the way, now drew near to Jericho. Of
what occurred in and near the city I offer no continuous narrative,
for it is difficult to frame such out of the details which the different
evangelists' present. St. Mark and St. Luke tell us of one blind man
only who was healed. St. Matthew tells us of two. Two of the
three evangelists speak of the healing as having occurred on Christ's
departure out of the town, the third of its having taken place on his
entrance into it. We may conclude with certainty that fliere were
two, and we may conjecture there were three blind men cured on this
occasion. In a city so large as Jericho then was, computed to con-
tain well-nigh 100,000 inhabitants — the number swelled by the
strangers on their way to the passover — it would not surprise us that
more cases than one of the kind described should have occurred.
One general remark upon this and all similar discrepancies in tlis
gospel narratives may be offered. It is quite enough to vindicate the
entire truthfulness of each separate account, that we can imagine
some circumstance or circumstances omitted by all, the occurrence (»J
which would enable us to reconcile them. How often does it happen
480 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
that two or three witnesses each tell what they saw and heard; their
testimonies taken by themselves present almost insuperable diffieul
ties in the way of reconciling them ; yet when the whole in all its
minute details is known, the key is then put into our hands by which
the apparent discord is at once removed. And when the whole nevei
can be known, is it not the wisest course to let the discrepancies
remain just as we find them ; satisfied if we can imagine any way by
which all that each narrator says is true ?
This can easily enough b© done in the case before us. Satisfied
with this, let us fix our attention on the stories of Bart'imeus and
Zaccheus, on the two striking incidents by which our Lord's entrance
into and exit from Jericho were made for ever memorable. How
different in all the outward circumstances of their lot in life were
these two men ! — the one a poor blind beggar, the other among the
richest men in the community. The revenues derived from the palm-
trees and balsam- gardens of Jericho were so great, that the g.rant of
them was one of the richest gifts which Antony presented Cleopatra.
Herod farmed them of the latter, and intrusted the collection of them
to these publicans, of whom Zaccheus was the chief. His position
was one enabling him to realize large gains, and we may believe that
of that position he had taken the full advantage. Unlike in other
things, in this Bartimeus and Zaccheus were at one — in their eager-
ness, their earnestness, their perseverance, their resolution to use all
possible means to overcome all obstacles thrown in the way of their
approach to Christ. The poor blind beggar sits beneath the shade
of some towering palm, waiting to salute each stray passenger as he
goes by, and solicit alms. Suddenly he hears the tread as of a great
multitude approaching. He wonders what it can be. He asks;
they tell him that Jesus of Nazareth is coming, and is about to pass
by. Jesus of Nazareth! he had heard of him before, heard of heal-
ings wrought by him, of blind eyes opened, of dead men raised.
Many a time in his darkness, in his solitude, as he sat alone by the
wayside, he had pondered who this great miracle-worker could be
and he had come to the conclusion that he could be no other than
the Son of David, the Messiah promised to their fathers. It had
never crossed his thoughts that he and this Jesus should ever meet
when now they tell him that he is near at hand, will soon be passing
by. He can, he may do that for him which none but he can do.
The whole faith and hope of his spirit breathed into it, he lifts the
loud and eager cry, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me." They
check him, they blame him, in every way they can they try to stop
him. He cries "the more a great deal; " it is his one and only
ZACCHEUS. 481
chance. He will not lose it, he will do all he can to reach that ear, to
arrest that passer-by. He cries the more a great deal, "Son of
David, have mercy on me."
So is it with the poor blind beggar, and so is it with the rich
publican. He too hears that Jesus of Nazareth is coming into
Jericho. He too has heard much about the Nazarene. He is living
now, he may have been living then, in the very neighborhood where
John the Baptist taught, where Jesus was himself baptized. The
gospel of the kingdom as preached by both, the gospel of repentance,
of turning from all iniquity and bringing forth fruits meet for repent-
ance, was familiar to his ears. The Baptist's answer to publicans
when they came to him, " Exact no more than that which is appointed
you," had sunk into his heart. That was the kingdom, the kingdom
of truth, of righteousness, into which now above all things he desired
to enter. With a conscience quickened, a heart melted and subdued
we know not how, he hears that Jesus is at hand. What would he
not give even for a sight of one whom secretly he has learned to
reverence and to love ! He goes out, but there is a crowd coming ; he
cannot stand its pressure ; he is little of stature, and in the bustle and
the throng will not be able even to catch a sight of Jesus. A happy
thought occurs : he sees behind him a large tree which casts its branch-
ing arms across the path. He runs and climbs up into the -tree. Ho
cares not for the ridicule with which he may be assailed. He cares
not for the grotesque position which he, the rich man and the honor-
able, may be seen to occupy. He is too bent upon his purpose to let
that or anything stand in the way of the accomplishment of his desire.
And now let us notice how these two men are treated. Jesus
stands still as he comes near the spot where poor Bartimeus stands
and cries, points to him, and tells those around him to go and bring
him into his presence. The crowd halts. The messengers do Christ's
bidding. And now the very men who had been rebuking Bartimeus
for his too loud and too impatient entreaties, touched with pity, say,
" Be of good comfort, rise, he calleth thee." He does not need to be
told a second time, he does not wait for any guiding hands to lead
him to the centre of the path. His own quick ear has fixed the
point from which the summons comes. His own ready arm flings
aside the rude garment that he had worn, which might hinder him
in his movement. A few eager footsteps taken, he stands in the pres-
ence of the Lord. Nor has he then to renew his supplication.
Jesus is the first to speak. " What wilt thou that I should do unto
thee?" There are not many things among which to choose. There
is that one thing that above all others he would have done. " Lord,'
Ufe of Ohilit 31
482 THE LIFE OF CHHIST
says lie, " that I might receive my sight." And Jesus said, " Receive
thy sight, go thy way; thy faith hath made thee whole." And imme-
diately he received his sight.
See now how it fares with Zaccheus. He has got up into the
tree, he is sitting there among its branches, half hoping that, seeing
all, he may remain himself unseen. The crowd comes up. He does
not need to ask which is the one he desires so much to see. There
ho is, the centre of the throng, his calm, majestic, benignant look and
bearing marking him off from all around. The eyes of the chief
publican are bent upon him in one fixed concentrated gaze of wonder
and of love, when a new ground of wonder and of gratitude is given.
Here too Jesus stops, and looking up he names him by his name, as
if he had known him long and well. "Zaccheus," he said, "make
haste and come down ; for to-day I must abide at thy house."
Such is the free spontaneous mercy in either case exercised by
our Lord ; such is the way in which he meets simplicity of faith, ardor
of desire, strenuousness of effort, as seen in the blind beggar and in
the rich publican. And what in either case is the return? "Go thy
way," said Jesus to Bartimeus. He did not go, he could not go.
His blinded eyes are opened. The first object they rest on is their
opener. Bright shines the sun above — fair is that valley of the Jor-
dan — gorgeous the foliage of the palm and the sycamore, the acacia
and the balsam-tree. New and wondrous sights to him, but he sees
them not, or heeds them not. That fresh faculty of vision is exer-
cised on Him by whom it had been bestowed, and upon Him all the
wealth of its power is lavished. And him "he follows, glorifying
God." Not otherwise is it with Zaccheus : " Make haste," said Jesus,
" and come down." And he made haste, and came down, and received
Christ joyfully, little heeding the derisive looks cast on him as he
made his quick descent, the murmurings that arose from the multi-
tude as he received Jesus into his house. The threshold is scarcely
crossed when he stands in all humility before Jesus and says : " Be-
hold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor ; and if I have
taken anything from any man by false accusation, I restore him
fourfold." One scarce can tell whether he is describing a practice
for some time previously pursued, or a purpose then for the first
time in the presence of Jesus deliberately taken. In either case the
evidence of a true repentance on his part is the same. The mai.
among the Jews who gave the fifth part of his income to the pooi>
was counted as having reached the height of perfection as to alms-
giving. Zaccheus gives one-half, and not one-fifth. The law of Moses
required in one special case alone that a fourfold restitution should
JESUS AT JERICHO. 483
be made Zacclieus, in every instance in which he can relnembei
that by any dishonorable practice on his part any man had suffered
loss promises that restitution to that extent should be made to him.
Jesus, accepting the evidence of a true repentance that is thus pre -
rented, makes no criticism upon the course of conduct indicated,
suggests no change, but says, "This day is salvation come to thin
house, forasmuch as he also is a son of Abraham" — once a lost sheep
of the chosen fold, lost, but now found by the Good Shepherd, and
by him welcomed back — "for the Son of man," he adds, "is come to
seek and to save that which was lost."
One general feature of these incidents at Jericho let us now glance
at, as singularly appropriate to this particular period of our Lord's
history, the absence of all reserve, the full disclosure of himself and
of his redemption which he makes. Other blind men had called him
the Son of David, but he had straitly charged them not to make him
known. No such charge is given to Bartimeus. He is permitted to
follow him and glorify God as loudly, as amply as he can. Not till
the last stage of his ministry in the north had he ever spoken even
to his disciples of his death. Now he not only speaks to them
more plainly and explicitly than ever before, but he goes on to
announce the great intention and object of his death. The Son of
Man, he declares, is come " to give his life a ransom for many ; to
seek and to save that which was lost." Thus it is, as the time is
now so near, and as all the reasons for that reserve which Jesus had
previously studied are removed, that he holds up his death as the
payment of the great price of our redemption, the ransom given
by the Living One for the lost.
Two better instances illustrative of how the sinner and the Saviour
are brought together, of what true faith is, and what true repentance,
you could not well desire, than those of Bartimeus and Zaccheus,
capable each of manifold spiritual applications. We can but gather
up the general warnings and great encouragements that they convey.
Sinners we all by nature and practice are — as poor, as blind, as
beggared as Bartimeus was — as thoughtless, careless, reckless, world-
ly-minded as Zaccheus. And Jesus of Nazareth is passing by. It is
but a single day we have for meeting with him, that short day of
life, the twelve hours of which are so swiftly running out. Let us
but be as earnest to see him as those two men were, as careless of
what others say or do, as resolute to overcome all difficulties ; and we
shall find that he will be as ready to hear, to heal, to come to us, to
take up his abode with us, to bring salvation with him, to gather us,
the lost, into the fold of the saved.
184 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
Jericho is changed from what it was. So little is left of the city,
of its hippodrome and amphitheatre, its towers and its palaces, thai
it is difficult to determine its site. Its gardens and its groves are
gone, not one solitary palm-tree for a blind beggar to sit beneath,
nor a sycamore for any one to climb. The City of Fragrance it wag
called of old. There remains now but the fragrance of those deeds
of grace and mercy done there by him who in passing through it
closed his earthly journeyings, and went up thence to Jerusalem
to die.
XVII.
The Anointing at -Bethany.*
In the whole bearing and conduct of Jesus in and about Jericho
there was much to indicate that some great crisis in his history was
at hand. It does not surprise us to be told of the disciples' believing
"that the kingdom of God should immediately appear." It was
because he knew that they were so misconceiving the future that lay
before him and them, that, either in the house of Zaccheus, or after-
wards on the way up to Jerusalem, Jesus addressed to them the
parable of the Pounds. He would have them know, and could they
but have penetrated the meaning of that parable they would have
seen, that so far from any such kingdom as they were dreaming of
being about to be set up for him in Jerusalem, he was going through
the dark avenue of death to another, to a far country, to receive the
kingdom there, and after a long interval to return ; and that, so far
from their being about to share the honors and rewards of a newly
erected empire, they were to be left without a Head, each man to
occupy and to labor till He came again. Another parable, that of the
Laborers in the Vineyard, spoken but a day or two before, had a
kindred object — was intended to check the too eager and ambitious
thirst for the distinctions and recompenses that the apostles imagined
were on the eve of being dispensed. The addressing of two such
parables as these to his disciples, with the specific object of rectify-
ing what he knew to be their false ideas and expectations, the readi-
ness with which he listened to the cry of the blind beggars by the
wayside, and the interest that he took in the chief of the publicans,
conspire to show how far from a mere narrow or selfish one was the
interest with which Jesus looked forward to what was awaiting him
* Matt. 26 • G-13 ; Mark 14 : 3-9 ; John 12 : 1-8.
THE ANOINTING AT BET BANT. 485
in Jerusalem. During the two days' journey from Penea through
Jericho to the holy city, his thoughts were often and absorbingly
fixed on his approaching sufferings and death, but it was not so
much in their isolated and personal as in their public and world-
Tide bearings and issues that he was contemplating them ; nor had
he contemplation any such effect as to make him less attentive to
die state of thought and feeling prevailing among his disciples, 01 less
ready to be interested in those who, like Bartimeus and Zaccheus,
threw themselves in his way.
In coming down into the valley of the Jordan, Jesus had joined
the large and growing stream of people from the north and the east,
passing up to the approaching Passover. There would be many
Galileans among the group who had not seen him now for many
months, and who, if they had not heard of it before, must have heard
now at Jericho of all that had happeued at the two preceding Feasts
of Tabernacles and Dedication, of his last great miracle at Bethany,
of the great excitement that had been created, and of the resolution
of the Sanhedrim to put him to death. And now he goes up to face
these rulers, to throw himself, as they fancy, upon the support of the
people, to unfold the banner of the new kingdom, and call on all his
followers to rally round it. His Galilean friends heartily go in with
what they take to be his designs ; they find the people generally con-
curring in and disposed to further them. One can imagine what
was thought and felt, and hoped and feared, by those who accom-
panied Jesus as he left Jericho. A few hours' walk would now carry
him and them to the metropolis. It was Friday, the 8th day of their
Jewish month Nisan. The next day was Saturday, their Jewish Sab-
bath. On the Thursday following the lamb was to be slain, and the
Passover festival to commence. The great body of the travellers
press on, to get into the towm before the sunset, when the Sabbath
commences. Jesus and his apostles turn aside at Bethairy, where
the house of Martha and Mary and Lazarus stands open to receive
them. Here in this peaceful retreat the next day is spent, a quiet
Sabbath for our Lord before entering on the turmoil of the next few
dsijs. The companions of his last day's journey have in the mean-
time passed into Jerusalem. It is already thronged with those who
had come up from the country to purify themselves for the feast.
With one and all the engrossing topic is Jesus of Nazareth. Gather-
ing in the courts of the temple, they ask about him, they hear what
has occurred; they find that "both the chief priests and the Phari-
sees had given a commandment, that if any man knew where he was,
he should show it, that Ohey might take him." AA'hat, in the face of
iS6 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
such an order, will Jesus do? "What think ye," they say to one
another, "that he will not come to the feast?" But now they heai
from the newly arrived from Jericho that he is coming, means to be
at the feast, is already at Bethany. They hear that Lazarus, the
man whom he so recently raised from the dead, is also there. He
may not have been there till now. He may have accompanied Jesus
to Ephraim, or chosen some other place of temporary retreat, for a
bitter enmity had sprung up against him as well as against Jesus,
" The chief priests had consulted that they might put Lazarus also
to death, because that by reason of him many of the Jews believed
on Jesus." Whether he had retired for a time or not, Lazarus is
now at Bethany. Many, unable to restrain their curiosity, go out
to the village, "not for Jesus' sake only, but that they might see
Lazarus also." It was but a short distance, not much more than a
Sabbath-day's journey. During this day, while Jesus and Lazarus
are there together, many visitors go forth to feast their eyes upon
the sight, and on returning to quicken the excitement among the
multitude.
It was on the evening of the Saturday, when the Sabbath was
over, and the next, the first day of the week, had begun, that they
made Jesus a supper in the house of Simon, who once had been a
leper, some near relative in all likelihood of the family of Lazarus,
and Jesus sits at this feast between the one whom he had cured of
his leprosy and the other whom he had raised from the dead.
Martha serves. She had not so read the rebuke before administered
to her as to believe that serving — the thing that she most liked, to
which her disposition and her capabilities at once prompted her —
was in itself unlawful or improper, that her only duty was to sit and
listen. But she had so profited by the rebuke that, concerned as she
is that all due care be taken that this feast be well served, she turns
now no jealous look upon her sister, leaves Mary without murmuring
or reproach to do as she desires. And Mary seizes the opportunity
now given. She has not now Jesus to herself. She cannot, as in the
privacy of her own dwelling, sit down at his feet to listen to the
gracious words coming from his lips. But she has an alabaster phial
of fragrant ointment — her costliest possession — one treasured up for
some unknown but great occasion. That occasion has arrived. She
gets it, brings it, approaches Jesus as he sits reclining at the table,
pours part of its contents upon his head, and resolves that the whole
contents shall be expended upon him. She compresses the yielding
material of which the phial was composed, breaks it, and pours the
last drop of it upon his feet, flinging away the relics of the broken
THE ANOINTING AT BETHANY. 487
ressel, and wiping his feet with her hair. Kingly guest at royal
banquet could not have had a costlier homage of the kind rendered
to him. That Mary had in her possession so rich a treasure may be
accepted as one of the many signs that her family was one of the
wealthiest in the village. That she now took and spent the whole of
it upon Jesus, was but a final expression of the fulness and the
intensity of her devotion and her love.
Half hidden behind the Saviour's reclining form, she might
have remained unnoticed, but the fragrant odor rose and filled the
house, and drew attention to her deed. Cold and searching and
jealous eyes are upon her, chiefly those of one who never had any
cordial love to Jesus, who never had truly sympathized with the
homage rendered him, who held the bag, had got himself appointed
keeper of the small parse they had in common, who already had
been tampering with the trust, and greedily filching from the narrow
stores committed to his care. Love so ardent, consecration so entire,
sacrifice so costly as that of Mary, he could not appreciate. He dis-
liked it, condemned it; it threw such a reproach by contrast upon
his own feeling and conduct to Christ. And now to his envious,
avaricious spirit it appears that he has got good ground for censure.
He had been watching the movements of Mary, had seen her bring
forth the phial, had measured its size, had gauged the quantity, esti-
mated the quality, and calculated the value of its contents. And now
he turns to his fellow-disciples, and whispers in their ears the invid-
ious question, " Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred
pence, and given to the poor?" Three hundred pence ! equal to the
hire of a laborer for a whole year — a sum capable of relieving many
a child of poverty, of bringing relief to many a house of want. Had
Judas got the money into his own hands — instead of being all lav-
ished on this act of outward attention, had it been thrown into the
common stock — it would not have been upon the poor that it should
have been spent. He would have managed that no small part of the
money should have had a very different direction given it. But it
serves his mean malicious object to suggest that such might have
been its destination. And by his craft, which has a show in it of a
wise and thoughtful benevolence, he draws more than one of his
fellow- apostles along with him, so that not loud but deep, the mur-
muring runs round the table, and they say to one another, "To what
purpose is this waste? this ointment might have been sold for
much, and given to the poor."
Mary hears the murmuring, sees the eyes of one and another
tn -ned askance and condemningly upon her, shrinks under the de
438 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
tracting criticism of the Lord's own apostles, begins to wondei
whether she may not have done something wrong, been guilty of a
piece of extravagance which even Jesus may perhaps condemn. It
had been hard for her before to bear the reproach of her bustling
sister, but harder a thousand times to bear the reproach of the
twelve. But neither then nor now did she make any answer, offer
any defence of herself. She did not need. She had one to do that
office for her far better than she could have done it for herself. Jesus
is there to throw the mantle of his protection over her, to explain and
vindicate her deed. "Let her alone," he said, " why trouble ye the
woman? she hath wrought a good work upon me." He might have
singled out the first adverse criticiser of Mary's act, the suggester
and propagator of the censorious judgment that was making its
round of the table. Then and there he might have exposed the
hollowness, the hypocrisy of the pretence about Ms caring for the
poor, upon which the condemnation of Mary was based. And doing
so, he might have made the others blush that they had given such
ready ear to a speech that such a mean and malignant spirit had
first broached. He did not do this, at least he said nothing that had
any peculiar and exclusive reference to Judas. But there must have
been something in our Lord's manner — a look perhaps, such as he
bent afterwards on Peter in the judgment-hall — that let Judas know
that before Jesus he stood a detected thief and hypocrite. And it
was not to weep bitterly that he went forth from that supper, but
with a spirit so galled and fretted that he took the earliest opportu-
nity that occurred to him to commune with the chief priests and the
temple guard as to how he might betray his master, and deliver him
into their hands.
Losing sight of him, let us return to Christ's defence of Mary.
"She hath done a good work," he said, 'a noble work, one not only
far from censure, but worthy of all praise. She hath done it unto
me, done it out of pure deep love — a love that will bring the best, the
costliest thing she has, and think it no waste, but rather its fittest,
worthiest application, to bestow it upon me.' Upon that ground
alone, upon his individual claims as compared with all others, Jesus
might well have rested his vindication of Mary's act. Nay, might he
not have taken the censure of her as a disparagement of himself?
All these his general claims — which go to warrant the highest, cost-
liest, most self-sacrificing services that an enthusiastic piety can
render — he in this instance is content to waive, fixing upon the pecu-
liarity of his existing position and the speciality of the particular
service that she has rendered, as supplying of themselves an ample
THE ANOINTING AT BETHANY. 489
justification of the deed that had been condemned. The claims of
the poor had been set up, as if they stood opposed to any such ex-
penditure of property as that made by Mary in this anointing of the
Saviour. It was open to Christ to say that it was an altogether need-
less, false, injurious conflict thus sought to be stirred' up — as if to
give to him, to do anything for him, were to take so much from the
poor ; as if no portion of the great fund of the church's wealth was
available for any purely devout and religious purpose till all the
wants of all the poor were met and satisfied — wants, be it remem-
bered, of such a kind that though we supplied them all to-day,
would emerge in some new form to-morrow — wants which it is im-
possible so to deal with as wholly and permanently to relieve. He
is no enlightened pleader for the poor who would represent them and
their necessities as standing in the way of the indulgence of those
warm impulses of love to Christ, out of which princely benefactions,
as well as many a deed of heroic self-sacrifice, have emanated. The
spirit of Judas, indeed — cold, calculating, carping, disparaging — has
often crept even into the Christian society, and men bearing the
name of Jesus have often been ready, when great donations on behalf
of some strictly religious enterprise were spoken of, to condemn them
off-hand on this one ground, that it would have been much better
hud the money been bestowed upon the poor. Just as, when a large
estate was once sold in this country, and the proprietor, moved by a
favored idea, resolved to devote the entire proceeds of the sale to
Christian missions in India, there were not wanting those who said —
I quote now the words of one of them — " What a mad scheme this
of Haldane's ! How many poor people might that money have fed
and clothed ?" The world, let us bless God for it, is not so poor that
there is but one way — that, namely, of almsgiving — for gratifying
those generous impulses which visit the heart and impel to acts of
singular liberality. He who put it into the heart of Mary to do
what she did towards the person of Christ, has put it into the hearts
of others since to do like things towards his cause. And if in many
such like instances there be more of mere emotion, more of the indul-
gence of individual taste than of staid and wise-hearted Christian
benevolence, let us not join with the condemnors of them, unless we
be prepared to put a check upon all the free, spontaneous expressions
of those sentiments of veneration, gratitude, and love to Jesus Christ,
out of which some of the most chivalrous and heroic deeds have
sprung by which the history of our race has been adorned.
It is, however, as has been already said, upon somewhat narrower
ground that Christ vindicates the act of Mary. It was one of such
490 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
personal attention to him as could be shown to him only while he
was present in the flesh. "The poor," said he, "ye have with you
always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good, but me ye
have not always." Further still, it was one that but once only in all
his earthly life could be shown to Jesus, for "in that she hath poured
this ointment on me, she is come aforehand to anoint my body for
the burial." Had Mary any definite idea that she was doing before-
hand what Joseph and Nicodemus would have no time and opportu-
nity for doing, what the two other Marys would go out to do to find
only that the need for its being done was over and gone ? It may be
assuming too much for her to believe that, with a clearer insight and
a simpler faith in what Jesus had said than had yet been reached by
any of the twelve, she anticipated the death and burial of her Master
as near at hand. But neither can we think that she acted without
some vague presentiment that she was seizing upon a last oppor-
tunity, that the days of such intercourse with Jesus were drawing to
an end. She knew the perils to which he would be exposed when-
ever he entered Jerusalem. She had heard him speak of his approach-
ing sufferings and death. To others the words might appear to be
without meaning, or only to be allegorically interpreted, but the
quick instinct of her deeper love had refused to regard them so, and
they had filled her bosom with an indefinite dread. The nearer the
time for losing, the more intense became the clinging to him. Had
she believed as the others around her did, had she looked forward
to a speedy triumph of Jesus over all his enemies, and to the visible
erection of his kingdom, would she have chosen the time she did for
the anointing? would she not have reserved to a more fitting oppor-
tunity a service that was more appropriate to the crowning of a new
monarch than the preparing of a living body for the tomb ? In
speaking as he did, Jesus may have been only attributing to Mary a
fuller understanding of and simpler faith in his own prophetic utter-
ances than that possessed at the time by any of his disciples. Such
a conception of her state of mind and heart would elevate Mary to a
still higher pinnacle than that ordinarily assigned to her, and we can
see no good reason for doubting that it was even so. But it does
not require that we should assign to her any such preeminence of
faith. It was the intensity of the personal attachment to Jesus that
her act expressed which drew down upon it the encomium of the
Lord. Thus he had to say of it what he could say of so few single
services of any of his followers — that in* it she did what she could,
did all she could— in that direction there was not a step farther that
she could have taken. Of all like ways and forms of expressing
THE ANOINTING AT BETHANY. 491
attachment there was not a higher one that she could have chosen.
Her whole heart of love went out in the act, and therefore Jesus
said of it, "Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall he
preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done
shall be spoken of for a memorial of her" — the one and only case
in which Jesus ever spoke of the after earthly fame of any service
rendered to him, predicting for it such a widespread reputation and
such an undying remembrance. Thus said Chrysostom, when dis-
coursing upon this incident : "While the victories of many kings and
generals are lost in silence, and many who have founded states and
reduced nations to subjection are not known by reputation or by
name, the pouring of ointment by this woman is celebrated through-
out the whole world. Time hath passed away, but the memory of
the deed she did hath not waned away. But Persians and Indians
and Scythians and Thracians, and the race of the Mauritanians, and
they who inhabit the British Isles, publish abroad an act which was
done in Judea privately in a house by a woman." Fourteen hundred
years have passed and gone since in the great church of St. Sophia
at Constantinople Chrysostom uttered these words, referring to these
British Isles as one of the remotest places of the then known world.
The centuries that have rolled by since then have witnessed many a
revolution, not the least wonderful among them the place that these
British Isles now occupy, but still wider and wider is the tale of Mary's
anointing of her Master being told, the fragrance of the ointment
spreading, yet losing nothing of its sweetness ; such fresh vitality, such
self-preserving power, lodging in a simple act of pure and fervid love.
One single parting glance let us cast upon our Saviour as ne
presents himself to our eye upon this occasion. He sits at a festive
board. He is surrounded by men looking joyously forward to days
and years of success and triumph. But he knows what they do
not — that on that day week his body will be lying in the new-made
sepulchre. And he accepts the anointing at Mary's hand as prepar-
ing his body for the burial. He sits the invited guest of a man who
had been a leper, surrounded in that village home by a few humble
followers. With serene eye he looks down into the future, and abroad
over the earth, and speaks of it as a thing of certainty that this
gospel— the gospel of glad tidings of salvation in his name — was to
be preached throughout the whole world. If it be true that Jesus
thought and felt and spoke and acted thus, how vain the attempt to
explain away his foresight of the future, to reduce it to the dimen-
sions of the highest human wisdom sagaciously anticipating what
was afterwards to occur.
492 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
With Part IV the lessons enter upon the profound and world-moving
period of our Lord's life known as the Passion Week. Passion here
has its primary meaning of suffering. So tremendous is the value of
this week in the work of redemption that the record of it covers about
one-third of the material of the Gospels, and Dr. Hanna in this book
gives a like proportion of pages to it.
The present lesson covers Sunday, known as the Day of Triumph,
and Monday, the Day of Authority, because upon those days Christ
made his triumphal entry into Jerusalem and again cleansed the Temple
as he had at the beginning of his ministry. It is of course to be remem-
bered that Sunday was not then the sacred rest-day. Saturday,
according to the old covenant, had been given to rest, and Christ had
spent that day at Bethany. On Sunday, at a little village nearer to
the city Christ, through his disciples, secures a young donkey, and
seated upon the colt he proceeds around the southern shoulder of the
Mount of Olives in his triumphal progress toward Jerusalem. As he
beholds the city, he weeps over it and predicts its destruction. Acclaimed
by the multitude he enters the city and the temple, and then returns
to Bethany. On Monday, in his visit to the temple there shines out
once more the majesty of his divine presence and authority.
PART IV. PASSION WEEK'TO GETHSEMANE.
Study 16. Triumphal Entry and Day of Authority.
(1) The road which Christ would use 493, 494
(2) Preparations and first stage of procession 494-496
(3) Christ's lament over Jerusalem 496-498
(4) Conclusion of the triumphal entry . ; 498
(5) Significance of Christ's tears and lamentation 498-500
a. Christ's foreknowledge shown 498, 499
5. Opportunity of choice 499
c. Line of destiny passed 499, 500
(6) Return to Bethany 498-501
(7) Blighting of the barren fig-tree 501-504
(8) Second cleansing of temple 505-507
a. The traffickers cast out ... 505, 506
b. The blind and the lame healed 506
c. Hosannas of the children . ....»* 507
THE PASSION WEEK.
I.
The Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem — Jesus weep-
ing oyer the City.*
SUNDAY,
The road from Jericho to Jerusalem, as it winds up the eastern
slopes of Olivet, passes close by the village of Bethany. From the
village a footpath runs up to the top of the mount, and thence down
a steep declivity into the ravine of the Kedron. This being the
shortest, may have been the path ordinarily taken by the villagers
when going on foot to and from Jerusalem. It was not the way that
Mij rider, not the way that the caravans of Passover pilgrims coming
up from Jericho, would choose. They naturally would take the
somewhat longer, but much better and more level road, which runs
round the southern shoulder of the ridge as it shelves down toward
the Mount of Offence. The single circumstance that, on the occasion
now before us, Jesus rode into the city, might of itself have led us to
believe that it was by the latter road he went. Still further confir-
mation of this meets us as we enter into the details of this short but
ever memorable procession.
The quiet day of Sabbatic rest at Bethany is over. Released
from its restraints, visitors may now freely pass from Jerusalem to
Bethany. Of this freedom numbers avail themselves, and the village
is crowded. It is understood that at some time in the course of the
day — the first day of the week — Jesus means to go into the city.
During the forenoon the tidings of his intention are widely circulated,
It was now but four days to the I^ssover, and the crowds of pilgrims,
requiring as they did a day or two of preparation, have nearly all
arrived. In and about Jerusalem between two and three millions of
Matt. 21 : 1-11 ; Mark 11 : 1-11 ; Luke 19 : 29-44 ; John 12 : 12-18.
194 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
people* — more than a third of the entire population of Judea and
Galilee — are assembled. The town itself is unable to afford accom-
modation to all the strangers. The environs all around are studded
with booths and tents. The side of Olivet that looks toward the
city, not the least favorite suburb, along which the road from Jericho
descends, is covered with these temporary erections. In the after-
noon Jesus leaves the village and joins the companies coming up
from the valley of the Jordan. The road winds southward for a
short distance out upon a ledge of the mountain, from the top of
which is caught a distant view of a part of Mount Zion lying outside
the walls, the great city itself being concealed. At this point, imme-
diately before and beneath the traveller, there is a deep hollow run-
ning up into and dying out upon the hill side, to avoid descending
into which the road takes first a sudden bend to the right, till it
reaches nearly to the top of the ravine, and then turns again to the
left, to traverse the opposite spur of the mountain. Pausing for a
moment at this spot, Jesus sees ' over against' him, across the hollow,
the village of Bethphage.f Calling two of his disciples he bids them
go by the short cut across the valley to the village, and bring an ass
and a colt that they would find there, and to have them ready upon
the road running near to Bethphage by the time that he and the rest
of the disciples have made the round by the head of the hollow.:)
The disciples listen with wonder to these instructions. It is but a
short distance into the town — an hour's walk, or less ; it cannot be
through weariness that Jesus wishes to have an ass to ride upon.
He had seldom if ever before used this mode of travelling, one not
having any special dignity in our eyes, but one that highest dignita-
ries in the East, kings and princes, prophets and priests, might not
unsuitably, upon the most important occasions, make use of. Can it
be that the hour so long waited for has come ? Can it be that Jesus
* Josephus estimates the numbers present on a Passover occasion at about
three millions, little short of half the population of the two provinces. The
number of lambs slain is stated to have been 256,500.
fThe description of the text is derived from a minute personal examination
of the localities. Upon the spot where in that description the village of Beth-
phage is represented as standing, tanks and foundations were perceived, the
undoubted evidences of the former existence of a village. The site is the same,
I presume, as the one assigned to the village by Dr. Barclay in the City of the
Great King. It fully and minutely answers, as I have endeavored to indicate,
fill the requirements of the narrative.
% As usual, the narrative of St. Mark is characterized by the mention of minute
particulars, such as the finding of the colt 'by the door without, in a place where
two ways met.' St. Mark may have received his information from St. Piiter,
who may have been one of the two sent across the valley by Christ.
THE PKOCESSION INTO JEKUSALEM. 495
is about to throw off his disguise, assume his real rank and character,
and enter the capital as the king of the Jews? As they move on,
groups of pilgrims coming out from Jerusalem meet them by the
way. To them they tell the orders Christ has given — tell the hopes
that are rising in their hearts. The excitement spreads and deepens.
They meet the asses by the way. It is the colt, the one upon which
no man yet had sat, that Jesus chooses. They cast their garments
on it, and set him thereon. They hail him as their Messiah, their
King. He does now what he never so fully did before : he accepts
the title, he receives the .homage. All is true, then, that they had
been thinking and hoping. It is openly and avowedly as Christ their
king that he is about to go into Jerusalem.
Then let all the honors that they can give him be bestowed. It
is but little of outward pomp or splendor they can throw around this
regal procession. They cannot turn the narrow mountain path into
a broad and covered roadway for their king, but they can strip ofl
their outer garments, and cast them as a carpet beneath his feet.
They can cut down leafy branches from the olive-trees and strew
them in his way. Royal standards they have none to carry, they
have no emblazoned flags of victory to wave. No choice instruments
of music are here, through which practised lips may pour the swell-
ing notes of joy and triumph, but they can pluck the palm-tree
branches (nature's own emblems of victory) and wave them over his
head, and they can raise their voices in hosannas round him. He
allows all this, receives it all as seemly and due. The spirit of exul-
tation and of triumph expands under the liberty and sanction thus
given. Swelling in numbers, freer and more animated in its expres-
sions, the procession moves on till the ridge of the hill is gained, and
the city begins to open to the view. The mighty multitude breaks
out into acclamations of praise ; those going before and those follow-
ing after vie with one another, and fill the air with their hosannas —
applying to Jesus, and this entry into Jerusalem, passages that
all understood to relate to the Messiah. 'Hosanna to the Son of
David ; blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord ; hosanna
in the highest ; blessed be the King, and blessed be the kingdom of
our father David ; peace in heaven and glory in the highest.' Some
Pharisees who are looking on and listening press through the crowd
and speaking to Jesus as one who must know and feel how misplaced
and how perilous his public acceptance of such homage as this must
be, would have him stop it. 'Master,' they say to him, 'rebuke thy
disciples.' 'I tell you,' is his reply, 'that if these should hold then
peace, the stones would immediately cry out/
£96 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Down the sloping path the procession moves. A ledge of rock is
reached, looking from which across the valley of the Kedron the
whole city lies spread out before the Saviour's eye.* The sight
arrests him ; the procession stops. All around is light and joy and
triumph. But a dark shadow falls upon the Saviour's countenance.
His eyes fill with tears. He beholds the city, and he weeps over it.
Another Jerusalem than the one sitting there at ease, clothed in
holiday attire, busied with its Passover preparations, is before his
eye — a Jerusalem beset, beleaguered, crouching in fear and terror,
doomed to a terrible destruction. How little power has the present
over the mind and heart of Jesus ! What cares he for this adulation
of the multitude, this parade of praise ? Even had it all been genuine,
all the outburst of an intelligent faith, an enthusiastic attachment to
him in his true character and office, it had not checked the current of
thought and feeling within the Saviour's heart. But he knows how
hollow it all is, how soon it will all die away. He thinks of the future ;
but of what future? Why was it not the future of the next few days?
Why did the scenes that were then before him not call up that
future? There before him lay the garden of Gethsemane ; there,
across the valley, outside the city walls, the hill of Calvary ; there,
in the midst of the lofty buildings that crowned the heights of Zion
and Moriah, rose the dwelling of the high priest and the palace of
Herod; and he who is now looking upon these places knows well
that before another Sabbath dawns he will be lying in agony in
that garden, that beneath these roofs he will be jeered at and spit
upon, and mock emblems of royalty forced upon him — the sentence
of condemnation ratified by the fiendish cries of the city multitude :
'Away, away with him! crucify, crucify him!' and that there, upon
the hill of Calvary, he will have to die the death of the cross. It
had been no disparagement to the humanity of Jesus had the sights
then before his eyes brought up before his thoughts the sufferings
and the death with which so soon they were to be associated. But
there is a higher reach of self-f orgetfulness here than tha t of dead-
ness or indifference to the acclamations of the surrounding multitudes.
Jesus puts aside the prospect of his own endurances, though so near
and so dark. He looks over and beyond them. Without naming
the city, yet, by some glance of the eye or motion of the hand mak-
ing clear the reference of his words as he stands weeping, he exclaims :
'If thou hadst known, even thou, thou upon whom for so many ages
go much of the divine goodness has been lavished, whose gates the
Lord has loved more than all the dwellings of Jacob, within whose
* See Dr. Stanley's Sinai and Palestine, p. 191.
THE TEAES SHED OVER JERUSALEM. 497
holy temple for so many generations the smoking altar and the bleed-
ing sacrifice without, and the gleaming light of the Shekinah within,
have spoken of a God there waiting to be gracious — if thou, even
thou, with all thy crowded sins upon thee, thy stoning of the prophets
and casting forth of those that were sent to thee — if thou at least, at
last, in this thy day, when, all his other messengers rejected, the
Father has sent forth his own Son to thee, saying, Surely they will
reverence my Son — if thou in thy day hadst known the things belong-
ing to thy peace spoken so often, so earnestly by him.'
'If thou hadst but known.' The sentence is cut short. For a
moment the bright vision rises of all that Jerusalem might have been
had she but known the time of her visitation. Had she but owned
and welcomed her Messiah when he came, then might she have sat as
a queen among all the cities of the earth. And he whom she honored
would have honored her so as to cast all her former glory into the
shade. Then, without her hands being steeped in the wickedness of
the deed, or any hands of wickedness being employed to do it, some
fit altar might have been found or reared, and in sight, not of mock-
ing enemies, but adoring friends, might the great sacrifice have been
offered up ; and from Jerusalem, as from the centre of the great
Christian commonwealth, might the tidings of the completed redemp-
tion have gone forth, and unto her all the glory and the honor of the
nations might have been brought. All this, and more, might have
been in that bright vision which for a moment rises before the
Saviour's eye. But quickly the vision disappears ; gives place to one,
alas ! how different. ' But now they are hid from thine eyes. Foi
the days will come that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee,
and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall
lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee ; and
they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another, because thou
knewest not the time of thy visitation.'
The pause, the tears, the lament over the doomed city, must have
produced a deep impression on those around. How little could thej
understand the meaning of what Christ said, or the source of the
emotion he displayed. One thing was clearly shown : the absence of
all anticipation on the part of Jesus of any present individual success
and triumph. There was much in the manner of his reception, in
the plaudits with which he was hailed, in the popular enthusiasm
that had found for itself such a vent, to have impelled a mere politi-
cal adventurer to take advantage of the occasion, and put himself at
the head of a great national movement. How easy had it been for
Jesus, had he gone in with the false ideas and expectations of the
Ufa of ChrUt. 32
498 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
thousands then congregated in and about Jerusalem, to have goi
himself recognized as their leader, and to have created a commotion
which there were no means at hand to allay ! His thoughts are fai
otherwise occupied. A sublime compassion fills his spirit, draws
forth his tears, and prompts those pathetic lamentations.
We are not told what effect this strange interruption of the
triumphal march produced. It must have done something to subdue
the ardor, to quiet the demonstrations of the crowd. The procession,
however, after the momentary pause, moves on ; the hosannas abated,
it may have been, but still continued. They go down into the valley,
they cross the Kedron, they climb the heights on which the city stood,
they enter into the nearest gate. The whole city is moved. The
great bulk of the town population look askance upon this singular
spectacle, far less acquainted with and less interested in Jesus than
the strangers from the country.
'Who is this?' they say, as they see Jesus in the centre of the
excited multitude ; c and what can all this mean ? ' They are told by
those taking part in the procession: 'This is Jesus, the prophet, of
Nazareth of Galilee.' How they received the intelligence we do not
know ; with something of wonder we may believe, and not a little of
incredulity and dislike. The movement, however, is too deep and too
extensive for any instant questioning of its character or interruption
of its progress. The authorities, taken in all likelihood by surprise,
do not interfere. Jesus goes up into the temple, looks round upon
all things that he saw there, and, the eventide being now come,
(Mark 11 : 11,) he turns, retraces his steps, and retires, we know not
how attended, to the quiet home at Bethany.
Upon the triumphal procession into the city, especially upon the
tears which -Jesus shed and the lamentation that he poured over
Jerusalem, let us offer one or two remarks.
1. How clear the proof here given of our Lord's intimate fore-
knowledge of all that was afterwards to occur! Any one might have
ventured on a prediction, grounding it upon what he knew of the
existing relationships between the Roman power and the Jewish
community, that a collision was imminent, that in that collision the
weaker party would be conquered, and Jerusalem should fall ; but
who save he to whom the future was as the present could have spoken
as Jesus did of the days when the enemy should cast a trench, anc?
raise a mound, and compass it round, and keep it in on every side ?
Josephus tells us how to the very letter all this was fulfilled — how
at an early stage of the four months' siege, Titus, the Eoman general
ki command summoned a council of war, at which three plans w T ere
THE TEAES SHED OYER JERUSALEM. 499
discussed : to storm the city, or to repair and rebuild the engines
that had been destroyed, or to blockade the city and starve it into
surrender. The third was the method adopted, and by incredible
labor, the whole army engaging in the work, a wall was raised, which
compassed the city round and round, and hemmed it in on every side.
2. A fresh mysterious awe attaches to the tears of Jesus shed thus
beforehand over Jerusalem, as we think that they were shed by hi in
whose own hand inflicted the judgment over which he lamented. Iu
this aspect these tears are typical, and have been rightly taken as
representative and expressive of the emotion with which Christ con-
templates the great spiritual catastrophe of the ruin of lost souls.
It might have been otherwise than it was with the doomed city.
Had it been utterly impossible for her to have averted that calamity,
had that impossibility been due, as it must have been had it existed,
to Christ's own ordinance, there had been hypocrisy in his tears, in
his weeping over the calamity as if it had been a curse drawn down
by Jerusalem upon herself by her own acts and deeds. But the
alternative had been set before the city ; the things belonging to her
peace had been revealed; she might have known them; it was her
own fault she did not; had she known, the terrible fate had not
befallen her. So it is with every lost spirit of our race. The things
belonging to our peace with God have been made clearly known and
openly set before us. They are ours in offer ; if we will, they may be
ours in possession. There is no outward hinder ance, no invincible
obstacle whatever to our entering into that peace, nothing but our
own unwillingness to be saved as Jesus desires to save us. If any of
us perish, over us the Saviour shall weep as over those who have
been the instruments of their own ruin.
How impressively too are we here taught that the day of grace,
the opportunity of return to and reconciliation with God, has its fixed
limits, narrower often than the day of life. Apparently Jerusalem's
day of grace extended for years beyond the time when he uttered the
words of doom, and let fall the tears of sympathy. Miracles were
wrought in her streets, exhortations and remonstrances addressed to
her children; but to that all-seeing eye before which the secret things
of God's spiritual kingdom lie open, the things belonging to her
peace were from that time hid from her eyes. The door was shut,
the doom was sealed. A like event happened of old to Esau when
he sold his birthright. That was the point of doom in his career,
and having passed it he found no place for repentance, for changing
the divine purpose regarding him, though he sought it carefully with
tears. A like event happened to ancient Israel on her exodus from
500 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Egypt. The time of trial as to whether an entrance should be min-
istered into the land of promise closed at her first approach to the
borders of Palestine ; closed when the Lord sware in his wrath that
she should not enter into that rest. A like event may happen in the
moral and spiritual history of any man. God's Spirit will not always
strive with ours. The time may come when the awful words will pass
froin the lips of the righteous Judge, " Ephraim is joined to his idols,
let him alone ;" — and Providence will let the man alone ; and the
Word of God will let the man alone; and his own conscience
will let the man alone ; and the Spirit of all grace will let the man
alone. It is not for us to usurp the prerogative of the Omniscient.
It is not for us to affirm of any one, let his character and conduct be
what they may, that he has reached or passed the mysterious point
beyond which that comes true. It is not for any one to pass such
sentence upon himself. But let all of us stand upon our guard, and
reflect that if for months or years we have been growing coldei,
deader, more indifferent to spiritual things, to the unseen and eternal
realities ; if conscience has been gradually losing her hold and weak-
ening in her power; if we can listen now unmoved to what once
would have impressed and affected us ; if we court and dally with
temptations that once we would have shunned ; if sins are lightly
committed which once we would have shrunk from ; by these and
such like marks, it is apparent that our day of grace has been declin-
ing, the shadows of its evening have been lengthening out, and that
if no change occur, if this course of things go on long, ere the sun of
our natural existence go down, the sun of our spiritual day may have
set, never to rise again.
II.
The Fig-tree withering Away — The (Second Cleans-
ing of the Temple.*
MONDAY.
Speaking generally of the days and nights of the memorable week
which preceded his crucifixion, St. Luke tells us that Jesus "in the
daytime was teaching in the temple, and at night he went out and
abode in the mount that is called the Mount of Olives." Luke 21 :37
The other evangelists speak of his going out at eventide to Bethany,
to lodge there. Some of the nights may have been spent in the village
* Matt. 21 : 12-17 ; Mark 11 : 12-19 ; Luke 19 : 45-48 ; John 12 : 19.
THE FIG-TREE WITHERING AWAI. 501
home ; some outside in the olive gardens. If the night which succeed-
ed his triumphal entry into the city was spent in the latter way, it may
have been in solitude, in sleeplessness, in fasting, and in prayer, that
its silent watches passed. And this would explain to us the circum-
stance, otherwise obscure, that next morning as he returned into the
;ity Jesus was hungry. In this condition, he saw at some distance
before him, by the wayside, a fig-tree covered with leaves. It is the
peculiar nature of this tree that ordinarily its fruit appears before its
leaves. Showing, as it did, such profusion of leaf, the fig-tree on
which the eye of Jesus rested should have had some fruit hanging on
its branches. But when he came up to it, it had none. Was Christ
then deceived and disappointed? Did he not know before he ap-
proached the tree that no fruit would be found upon it? If he did
know, should he have appeared to cherish an expectation which he
did not really entertain? In answer to these and many kindred
questions which may be raised regarding the incident, it is enough to
say that in his whole dealing with the fig-tree by the wayside, Jesus
meant, not to speak, but to enact a parable. In such acting, the
letter may, and in many instances must be false, that the spirit and
meaning may be truly and fully exhibited. Here is a tree which by
its show of leaves gives promise that it has fruit upon it. Nay more,
here is a tree which steps out in advance of all its fellows — for the
time of figs, the ordinary season for that fruit ripening in the neigh-
borhood of Jerusalem, has not yet come ; here is a tree which, by the
very prematureness and advanced condition of its foliage, tempts the
traveller to believe that he will find there the first ripe figs of the sea-
son. It is as an ordinary traveller that Jesus approaches it, and when
he finds that it has by its barrenness not only sinned against the laws
of its species, and failed to profit by the advantages it has enjoyed, but
in its early foliage made such a boastful and deceitful show of prece-
dence and superiority above its neighbors, he seizes upon it as one of
the fittest emblems he can find of that land and people so highly
favored, for which the Great Husbandman had done so much which
had set itself out before all other lands and peoples, and made so
large yet so deceitful a profession of allegiance to the Most High.
In his treatment of this tree, Jesus would symbolize and shadow forth
the doom that the making and the falsifying of these professions has
drawn down upon Israel. It was in mercy that in dumb prophetic
diow he chose to represent this doom in a calamity visited upon a
.senseless tree rather than upon a human agent. He might have
taken one or more of the men of whom this tree was but a type,
and in some terrible catastrophe inflicted upon them have prefigured
5U2 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the fate of their countrymen. Or he might, as he had done not
long before, when pointing to the heavy judgments impending
over Judea, have taken actual instances of human suffering, such as
that of the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their
sacrifices, or of the eighteen upon whom the tower in Siloam fell,
and employed them as emblems of the like destruction in reserve
for the impenitent. Upon the very occasion now alluded to, when
the first hint or obscure prophecy was given of the kind of ruin com-
ing upon Judea, he had spoken a parable in which he had used a
fig-tree as an emblem of Israel — a fruitless fig-tree, for which a
period of respite had been solicited and obtained, for which year
after year everything had been done, by digging about it and dung-
ing it, that skill and care could suggest. That parable, however,
had stopped at a very critical point. The intercession had pre-
vailed. The barren fig-tree was to be allowed to stand, another
year of trial was to be given to it. "We may assume that all which
the dresser of the vineyard promised would be done ; but the issue is
not revealed. The curtain drops as the fourth year begins. "What
happened at its close is left uncertain. After all this care and cul-
ture the barren fig-tree might remain barren still, and the sentence,
''Cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground?" come to be executed
upon it. Whether it was actually to be so or not the parable did
not reveal. But now this actual fig-tree of the wayside, found so full
of leaf though so empty of fruit, is taken, even as the fig-tree of the
parable to represent impenitent Israel, and in his treatment of it
Jesus takes up, carries on, and completes the parable, telling what
it left untold. Looking at Christ's act and deed in this light, as at
once symbolic and prophetic, as stretching in its significance beyond
ancient Israel, and embracing an exhibition of the result of pro-
fession without practice, show without substance in religion, let us
ask ourselves upon what ground was it that our Lord's cursing of
the tree was grounded, and in what did that curse consist?
The tree is condemned solely for its barrenness. It is not said
Of it that it showed a sickly, dwarfed, or stunted growth. It may
have stood as fair and goodly a tree to look upon as any fig-tree
around Jerusalem, offering as inviting an object to the traveller's eye,
furnishing in outspread branches and broad green leaves as refresh-
ing a shade. But whatever its other qualities, either for use or for
ornament, it wanted this one — it did not bear fruit. That was -its
fatal defect, and for that one defect the blighting words were spoken
against it, and it died. The tree had failed in its first and highest
office. A fig-tree is created that it may bear figs. That is its peeu-
THE BARREN FIG-TREE. 503
liar function in the physical creation, and if it fail in performing this
function, it forfeits its place in that creation, it incurs the penalty of
removal, it may righteously be treated as a cumberer of the earth.
We men have been created that, by being, doing, enduring what God
requires us to be and to do and to endure, we may bear some fruit
unto him, some fruit of that land which can be laid up in the eternal
garner. That is our allotted function in the spiritual creation, and
if it remain undischarged, then by us also is our place in that crea-
tion forfeited. In our natural barrenness and unfruitfulness towards
God a gracious intercessor has been found ; by him for us a period of
respite has been obtained, a period in which many a gracious minis-
try of his providence and Spirit is operating upon us. Long and
sadly may we have failed in fulfilling the great end of our creation,
yet if we will but yield ourselves to these kindly and gracious influ-
ences that the Eedeemer of our souls is so ready to exert, the place
that we had forfeited may still be ours, seasons of richer fruitfulnoss
may be before us on earth, and a long summer- tide of endless joy
beyond. But if we fail, if we resist these influences, if we still
remain barren before God, it will avail us little that we plead the
harmlessness of our lives, the gentleness, the goodness, the generos-
ity of our dispositions and conduct towards our fellow-men. Like
the barren fig-tree of the wayside we stand, with much, it may be, of
beauty, much of outward show, many an amiable quality in us to win
human love, not without use either, contributing largely to the
happiness of others, but barren towards God, fruitless in the eye of
Christ, open to the doom that we may force him to pronounce and
execute.
And what is that doom, as shadowed forth in the symbolic inci-
dent that we have now before us? Jesus does nothing to the barreu
fig-tree. No outward ministry of wrath is here employed ; no axe is
laid at the root of the tree ; no whirlwind blast from the wilderness
strips it of its leaves; no lightning-stroke from heaven is commis-
sioned to split its solid trunk, and scorch and wither up its fruitless
branches. The doom pronounced is simply this: "Let no man eat
fruit of thee hereafter for ever." The curse laid upon it was that of
perpetual barrenness. For the execution of that curse it was not
necessary that any kind of violence should be done to it; but it was
physically necessary that a&l those material agencies needed to make
it a fruit-bearing tree, which had so long and so unavailing been
operating, should now cea^e to act. This actually takes place. The
sentence passes from the lips of Jesus : "Let no fruit grow on thee
hencefojward for ever." His ministering servants hear and hasten
504 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to carry the sentence into execution. The earth hears and yields no
more nourishment to those roots; light and air, they hear and with-
hold from them their genial influences ; the rain may fall, the dew
may settle upon those branches, but not to recruit or re-invigorate.
It had not profited by them as it should, and now there is taken
away from it even that which it had. Poor solitary forsaken tree,
cut off by that fiat of heaven from all the supports of life and growth !
See how from that moment the glossy green of the spring leaves
grows dull; the branches begin to droop; the bark to crack; the
whole tree to shrink and shrivel up, till next morning the passers-by
see it dried up from the very roots !
And should the great Creator desire to deal with any barren
human spirit as he dealt with that barren fig-tree, what has he to do
in order to punish it for its barrenness ? He does not need to come *
forth out of his place to avenge the injury done to his great name.
He does not need to grasp any instrument of vengeance, or inflict
with it a single stroke ; no bolt of wrath need be hurled from above,
nor any hell from beneath be moved to draw the guilty spirit down
into its eddying fires. No ; all that God has to do is simply to pass
the same doom executed upon the fig-tree. He has but to desert
that spirit, to say, " Arise, let us go hence," and call away after him
as he goes all those powers and influences that had been at work
there so long and so fruitlessly, to leave it so absolutely and wholly,
finally and for ever, to itself. Poor solitary forsaken spirit, cut off
from God, and cast adrift upon a wild and shoreless sea, with thine
own vulture passions in thee, let loose from all restraint, to turn upon
thee and torture thee, and prey upon thee for ever ! What darker,
drearier hell than that? The soul breeding within it the worm that
never dies ; itself kindling the fire it cannot quench.
The sentence against the fig-tree pronounced, the elements having
got from their Creator the commission to execute it, which they were
not slow to do, Jesus passes on into the city and up into the temple.
He had on the preceding evening merely looked around on all that
was to be seen. It was the day (the tenth of the month Nisan) on
which, according to the old command, the Jews were solemnly to set
apart the paschal lamb for the coming sacrifice. And Christ's object
may then have simply been to present himseli as the true Lamb of
God, set apart from the beginning, who four days thereafter was to
offer up himself in the sacrifice of the cross. At the time of that
short evening visit all may have been comparatively quiet within the
temple. But now, as at an early hour he enters the court of the
Gentiles, the same sights are before him that met his eyes and stirred
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE. 505
his spirit three years before : the bustle of a great traffic, of buyers
and sellers, and money-changers, all busily engaged. In reproof of
such desecration, in assertion of his divine dignity and power as the
Son coming to his Father's house, with full authority to dispose of
all things there as he pleased, he had at the beginning of his minis-
try cleansed the temple, cast out the traffickers, overturned the
tables: of the money-changers — with little or no effect as it would
seem, for now all the abuses are restored. The hand of the cleansei
is as much needed as ever, and it is once more put forth as vigor-
ously, perhaps more so than before, for we detect increase of stern-
ness both in word and deed on this occasion. But why the repetition
of the act? Why begin and close the ministry in Jerusalem with
such cleansing of the temple? Though we could give no other
answer to such a question, we should be satisfied with regarding this
as one of the many instances in which Jesus repeated himself as he
did both in speech and in action. He knew the nature on which he
desired to operate. He knew how difficult it is to fix even the sim-
plest ideas, not connected with the outward world of sense and action,
in the minds and hearts of the great mass of mankind. He knew
that however good the instruments might be that are used to do this,
(and he chose the simplest and the best,) to make the impression
deep and lasting the stroke must be oft repeated; the same truth
told in the same words, or illustrated by the same emblems, or symbol-
ized by the same acts. In the gospels of St. Matthew and St. Mark
more than a dozen instances occur of the same discourses redelivered
with scarcely any variation in the phraseology ; and we may war-
rantably conclude that this happened far more frequently in the actual
ministry of Jesus than now appears upon the face of the record. It
was the same with the miracles as with the teachings of our Saviour.
Twice he fed many thousands on the hillside, and twice upon the
lake miraculous draughts of fishes were taken. It was in harmony
with the method thus so often followed, that at the commencement
and at the close of his labors in Judea, within the courts of the tem-
ple, in presence of the priests and the rulers, he asserted by a bold
and authoritative act his prophetic and Messianic character, his true
and proper Sonship to the Father. In the latter case we can see a
peculiar propriety in his having done so. The day before, he had
made his appeal to the people. In language borrowed from ancient
prophecy, and known by all to apply to Christ their coming king,
they had hailed him as their Messiah, and in his acceptance of their
homage he had publicly appropriated to himself the Messianic office.
It remained that he should make a like appeal to the priesthood.
506 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
calling on them to recognize him as holding that high office. He did
so the next day in the temple. It was the first thing he did on enter-
ing the holy place. This was the way in which he began that brief
ministry within its courts, in which his earthly labors were to close.
He knew beforehand how fruitless it would be; but nevertheless the
lign and token of who it was that was among them must be given.
The second cleansing of the courts of the temple appears to have
taken the custodians of the holy place as much by surprise as did the
first. They made no attempt to interrupt it, nor did they interfere
with Jesus in the use to which he turned the courts that he had
cleansed. For he did not retire after the purification was accom-
plished. He remained to keep guard over the place from which the
defilement had been removed, not suffering any man to carry even a
common vessel across the court, which the Jews had turned into a
common city thoroughfare. He remained for hours to occupy it un-
challenged ; the people flocked into it, and he taught them there.
They were all, we are told, very attentive to hear him, and they
were astonished at his doctrine — the citizens who had never heard
him teach so before, and the Galileans, to whom the doctrine indeed
was not new, but who wondered afresh to hear it spoken under the
shadow of the holy place. And the teaching had its usual accompani-
ment : " The blind and the lame came to him in the temple, and he
healed them" there. Matt. 21:14. He had wrought many miracles
before in Jerusalem, but never here and thus ; never within the walls
of the sanctuary; never in such a public and solemn manner, as
direct attestations of his asserted kingly dignity and power. For
hours he had the large outer court of the Gentiles at his command,
and this was the manner in which the time and the place were em-
ployed. What a change from the morning to the forenoon occupa-
tion; from the crowding, and the jostling, and the bargaining, and
the driving to and fro of cattle, to the silent multitude hanging upon
the lips of the great Speaker, or watching as one and another of the
lame and the blind are brought to him to be healed ! But where all
this while are the priests and the Levites, the rulers and the temple
guard ? They are looking on bewildered, their earlier antipathy kin-
dled into a tenfold fervor of hate. The closer to them he comes, the
more distinctively and forcibly he presses upon them the evidences
of his Messiahship, it convinces them the more what a dangerous
man he is, how utterly impossible it is that he can be any longer
tolerated or suffered to act in such a bold, presumptuous, defiant
style, the resolution they had already formed to destroy him taking
sinner hold of them than ever. For the moment, however, they fear
THE CLEANSING OF THE TEMPLE. 607
both hiin and the people: Mark 11:18; Luke 19:48; his conduct in
braving them within their own stronghold is so unlike anything that
they had ever fancied he would dare to do, the current of popular
k eliug runs so strongly in his favor. Not that there was much out
« Ard demonstration of this feeling. It had expended itself the day
before in the triumphal procession without the city gates, where all
felt more at liberty. Within the area of the temple, and under those
searching, frowning looks of the scribes and the chief priests, the
breath of the people is abated. Thinking of the strange tears and
lamentations over the capital, of all they see and hear within the
temple, something of doubt and uncertainty, of awe and fear, has
been stealing over the spirits of the ignorant multitude, which re
strains them from any marked or vehement expressions of attach-
ment. But there are little children among them who had takeu
part in yesterday's procession, within whose ears its hosannas are
still ringing. These feel no such restraint, and in the joyous ardor
of the hour and scene, they lift up their voices and fill the courts of
the temple with the cry, "Hosanna to the Son of David." This is
more than the chief priests and scribes can bear. In their dis-
pleasure they appeal to Christ himself, saying, " Hearest thou what
they say?" wishing him, as their allies had done the day before,
to stop praises, in their ears so profane, so blasphemous. All the
answer that they get is a sentence applicable to all praise that comes
from the lips of childhood, cited from a psalm which is through-
out a prophecy of himself, a proclamation of the excellency of his
name and kingdom over all the earth: "Have ye never read, Out of
the mouths of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise ?"
Pleasant ever to the eye of Jesus was childhood with its charm of
freshness, simplicity, buoyant freedom and open ardent love and
trust, and sweet ever to his ear the strains of juvenile devotion, but
never so pleasant as when he saw these bands of children clustering
round him in the temple; never so sweet as when — no others left to
do it — they lifted up their youthful voices in those hosannas, the last
accents of earthly praise that fell upon his ear.
At the rebuke and the quotation, the baffled scribes and high
priests retire, to do no more that day in the way of interruption ;
retire to mature their plans, to wait for the morrow, and see what it
will bring forth. So closed the last day but one of the active minis
fcry of Jesus.
507a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
Tuesday of Passion Week has been called the Day of Conflict,
because it is the one in which Christ is especially engaged in controversy
with the Jewish authorities in the form of a series of questions, prob-
lems, and entangling arguments presented to him in the temple. It is
followed by Wednesday, a Day of Retirement, probably at Bethany,
about which the Gospels give practically no record.
As Jesus and the Apostles were on their way from Bethany to
Jerusalem on the morning of Tuesday they came upon the barren fig-
tree, and Peter and the others saw that it was " dried up from the roots."
The lesson which Jesus drew from it was that of having faith in God.
When they arrive in the temple, the chief priests and the scribes
and the elders come with the challenging question as to the authority
with which Christ performs such acts — perhaps referring to his cleans-
ing the temple. Jesus presents the counter-question as to whether the
baptism of John was from heaven or of men. Unwilling to accept
either horn of the dilemma, they reply that they cannot tell, which
answer enables Christ to say, " Neither tell I you by what authority
I do these things." He then gives three parables of warning.
The Pharisees, having been discomfited, seek the help of the
Herodians, and they come with the question as to the lawfulness of
paying tribute to Csesar, that is, the Roman government. Jesus asks
them to show him a penny or denarius, and then inquires whose image
and superscription it bears.
Once more Christ is victor. The Sadducees now take their turn,
and bring forward a puzzling and ridiculous problem relating to the
resurrection, which Christ easily disposes of.
Lastly, a scribe or lawyer, apparently with no such evil intent
as the others, inquires as to the greatest or first commandment, and
our Lord gives the memorable summary enjoining love to God and man.
Lifting up once more the test, " What think ye of Christ? whose
son is he? " Jesus enters upon his denunciation and condemnation of
the scribes and Pharisees, that he may deliver the people, and espe-
cially his followers, from being longer misled by these blind guides.
Jesus now passes into the Court of the Women and sees the poor
widow casting two mites into the treasury and commends her.
The last occurrence in the temple on this eventful day is prophetic
— the desire of certain Greeks to see him, and the turning of his thought
to the great law that only through sacrifice and the cross will all men
be drawn to him.
OUTLINE STUDIES. 5076
PART IV. PASSION WEEK TO GETHSEMANE.
Study 17. Days of Conflict and Retirement.
(1) The Twelve perceive that the fig-tree is withered away 508
(2) Christ finds lessons of faith, prayer, and forgiveness 508-510
(o) Challenge of Christ's authority 510-512
a. Sanhedrim has met 510
b. Deputation challenges Christ's authority 510, 511
c. He asks them concerning John's baptism 512
d. They refuse to answer and Christ also refuses 512
(4) Three Parables of Warning 513-518
a. Parable of the Two Sons 513
b. Point of its application to the leaders 513
c. Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen 513, 514
d. Verdict of the people 514
e. Further figure of judgment through the stone rejected by the
builders 514, 515
/. Parable of the Marriage of the King's Son 516-518
g. Wrath and plotting of Christ's foes 518, 519
(5) Question as to paying tribute 519-525
a. Presented by the Herodians 519
6. Views of different parties 519, 520
c. The question submitted, and Christ's method of reply 520, 521
d. Applications of the principle 521-525
(6) Ideas and motives of the Sadducees 526-533
a. They were political materialists 526, 527
b. Disregarded Jesus till he stirred Jerusalem 527, 528
c. Their question concerning marriage and the resurrection 529
d. Jesus' answer 529-533
(7) Lawyer's question and Christ's answer 534-537
a. The man seems to be sincere in his inquiry 534
b. " Which is the first of the commandments? " 534
c. Christ's emphasis upon love . 534-536
d. The scribe's appreciative response 536, 537
(8) Christ's counter-question 537-540
a. The Messiah is David's son 538
b. How then is he also David's Lord? 538-540
(9) Woes uttered concerning the Pharisees 541-547
a. Contrast in the position of Christ and his adversaries 541
6. Definite purpose in their denunciation 542
c. The deep-seated evil of Pharisaism 542
d. Christ's twofold character as Saviour and Judge 545-547
(10) The widow giving two mites 547-550
a. Jesus passes into the Court of the Women 547
b. He notes the gift of the poor widow 547, 548
c. He commends her gift above others because of its motive 548-550
(11) The Greeks desiring to see Jesus 550-556
a. Christ told of their desire by Andrew and Philip 550, 551
b. The effect upon Jesus' thought 552
c. Glorified by sacrifice and suffering for others 553, 554
d. His sense of soul trouble and the Father's voice of approval .... 554, 555
e. The magnet of the cross 555, 556
50b THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
in
The Barren Fig-tree — Parables of the Two $6hs
AND OF THE WlCKED HuSBANDMEN,*
TUESDAY.
It was early on the morning of Monday, the second day of the
Passion week, that Jesus pronounced the doom upon the fig-tree.
The sentence took immediate effect: "Presently the fig-tree withered
away." Matt. 21 : 19. The withering, however, was not so instan-
taneous and complete as to attract at the moment the attention
of the disciples, or the shades of evening may have wrapped the
tree from their sight as they went out to the Mount of Olives.
Next morning, however, returning into the city by the same path
they had taken the day before, they came to the tree, looked at
it, and saw that it was "dried up from the roots." Mark 11:20.
Jesus himself seems scarcely to notice it, is about to pass it by.
The ready spokesman, Peter, calls his attention to it, and says,
" Master, behold, the fig-tree which thou cursedst is withered away.'"
Ifc is simple wonder, and nothing more; wonder at the power by
which such an effect had been accomplished, which breaks out in
this expression of the apostle. And he is the faithful represen-
tative of the state of feeling in the breasts of his brethren. The}
manifest no curiosity, at least make no inquiry as to the spir-
itual meaning of the incident. Their thoughts are engrossed witb
the singularity of the occurrence, that by a simple word spoken,
without any external agency employed, so large a tree, in full leaf,
should, within twenty-four hours, have shrunk up from its very roots,
and should now stand before them a leafless, shrivelled, lifeless thing.
Had they been in a different frame of mind, had they been wonder-
ing, not how, but why so strange a thing was done, Jesus might
have spoken to them otherwise than he did. As it was, he gra-
ciously accommodates himself to the existing condition of their
thoughts, by letting them know that his word had been a word of
power, because a word of strong undoubting faith, such faith as they
themselves might cherish. "And Jesus answering, saith unto them,
Have faith in God. For verily I say unto you, that whosoever shall
say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the
sea ; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe ; it shall be
done." In the early days of Christianity, the faith of the apostles
° Mark 11 : 20-33 ; 12 : 1-12 : Matt. 21 : 23-46 : Luke 20 : 1--19.
THE BARREN FIG-TREE. 509
was authorized and encouraged to take hold of the omnipotence of
the Deity, and through it to work miracles. This kind of faith, in
its absolute and perfect form, existed only in our Lord himself. To
the power itself by which the miracles were to be wrought there was
absolutely no limit, as there was none to that omnipotence which
the faith was to appropriate and employ. But in actual exercise the
power was to be proportioned to the faith. It was to be according
to their faith that it was to be done by them, as well as in them.
We accept it then as true to its whole extent, that at that time, and
as to these men, there was no miracle of power needful or useful for
the furtherance of their apostolic work, which their faith, had it
been perfect, might not have enabled them to accomplish. Of course
we understand that that would not have been a true or intelligent
faith in God which desired simply to make trial of its strength,
independently of the purpose for which the power was exercised.
We put aside, therefore, as quite frivolous and out of place, such a
question as this : Could St. Peter or St. Paul, when their faith was
strongest, have cast a mountain into the sea, or plucked up a
sycamore-tree by the roots? Whatever God saw w T as meet to be
done, the power to do that was given; and so to the very shadow
of the one, and to part of the dress of the other, a wonderful efficacy
was once attached. But they and all these early Christians were to
know that the gift of working wonders, which sat for a season like a
crown of glory upon the brow of the infant church, was not to be
idly and indiscriminately employed, and was ever to be reckoned as
of inferior value in God's sight to those inward graces of the soul, in
which true likeness to and fellowship with God consist. Thus it is
that from speaking of faith as putting itself forth in the working ol
miracles, Jesus proceeds to speak of it as expressing the desires of
the heart to God in prayer : "Therefore I say unto you, What things
soever ye desire when ye pray, believe that ye receive them, and ye
shall have them." "And when ye stand praying, forgive, if ye have
aught against any ; that your Father also which is in heaven may for-
give you your trespasses. But if ye do not forgive, neither will your
Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses." The last words
are the same that he had used in the Sermon on the Mount. Com-
paring the two cases, however, there is something more striking in
the parallel than the simple repetition of the same words. It was
after his having spoken for the first time the prayer that goes by his
name, that at the close — as if the one petition, "Forgive us our
debts, as we forgive our debtors," had been dwelling upon his mind,
and he desired to recur to it, so as to press home upon their hearts
510 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
tlie duty of forgiving others — that before passing on to another sub-
ject of his discourse, he said: "For if ye forgive men their tres-
passes, your heavenly Father will also forgive you : but if ye
forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive
Tour tiespasses." Matt. 6 : 14, 15. So is it here. He cannot speak
of the large and limitless influence of prayer without recurring to
the same idea, expressing and enforcing it in the same words. Why
have the two — our forgiving others, and being ourselves forgiven —
been linked thus together in such close and singular conjunction?
Not that there is any other ground of the divine forgiveness than the
free mercy of our God in Christ ; not that by pardoning others we
purchase the pardon of Jehovah ; but that the connection be-
tween the two is so constant, fixed, invariable, that neither can you
ever find the humble, broken, contrite heart, which sues for mercy
at the throne of grace, without finding there also the meek and
gentle spirit that goes forth forgivingly towards others ; nor do you
ever meet with such free, full, generous forgiveness of others, as from
those who have themselves partaken of the pardoning grace of God.
He who has been forgiven that great debt, the ten thousand talents,
how can he refuse to forgive the hundred pence ?
The words about forgiveness were spoken in the presence of the
withered fig-tree. The same mysterious power, which had in this
one instance been put forth to blast and to destroy, was to be con-
veyed to the disciples. May it not in part have been to warn them
that it was in no wrathful spirit, for no malignant or destructive
purposes, that it was to be wielded by them — that in such emphatic
terms they were reminded that it must ever be in a meek forgiving
spirit that they should sue for the aid of the heavenly power ?
The short conversation by the wayside over the walk into the
city is resumed, and the temple courts are reached, already filled,
though it was yet early, with eager expectant crowds. Before
beginning his work of teaching and of healing, Jesus is walking
leisurely through the courts, calmly surveying all around, looking
perhaps, to see what effect his act of the preceding day has had in
the way of removing the profanations of the place.
The Sanhedrim has met, a consultation has been held, it has
been resolved that as a preliminary step he shall be challenged, and
forced to produce and authenticate his credentials.
"As he was walking in the temple, there came to him the chief
priests and the scribes and the elders;" the three great bodies out
of whom the highest council of the Jews was constituted. It is a
formal deputation, in all likelihood, from this council, which now
THE CHALLENGE. 511
approaches and accosts him. Their question seems a fit and fair
one. Thej are the constituted keepers of the temple, of the only
public building of the city that the Romans have left entirely under
Jewish control. There has been a manifest invasion of the territory
committed to their guardianship, of the offices that they alone are
held competent to discharge; for who is this that, being neither
priest nor Levite, nor scribe nor elder, deals with the sacred place
as if it were his own ? Nothing at first sight more proper or perti-
nent than that they should come to one acting in such a way as
Jesus had done the day before, and say to him, " By what authority
doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?" We
remember, however, that three years before Jesus had acted in the
same way within the precincts of the temple, and that the same men
had then accosted him in the same manner. Their question then
indeed had been somewhat different from what it is now: " What
sign showest thou, seeing thou doest these things ?" Since then, sign
after sign had been given, miracle after miracle had been wrought,
proof after proof of his Messiahship had been presented. They had
refused to listen and be convinced; had turned all the multiplied evi-
dence aside, and dealt with it as if it were of no weight. And now,
at the close of a period teeming throughout with answers to theii
first challenge, they addressed him as if for the first time the ques-
tion as to what and who he was had to be raised. They do not,
indeed, now ask for signs; they must have other vouchers. They
must probe to the bottom the pretensions of this bold invader of their
temple, and draw out from him what they fondly hope will give them
sufficient ground legally to condemn him. They frame their queries
well. They first ask about the authority under which he acts.
They know that no authority but one, that of God himself, could
sanction the procedure of the Galilean. He may plead that author-
ity; but his own bare claiming it will not suffice — he must display
his title to the possession of this authority, must tell who gave it to
him. Looking at the motives by which they were actuated and the
sinister objects they had in view — considering, too, how full and
varied were the materials already in their hands for answering their
inquiry, Jesus might have kept silence and refused to answer, He
does not do this: he gives indeed no direct or categorical reply;
but it would be wrong to say that he cleverly or artfully evades the
question they put to him by asking them another upon a quite differ
ent subject ; that he suspends his reply to them on theirs to his, sc
that, out of their refusal to answer, he may construct a defence
of his own silence. It was not as a mere evasion of a captious
512 THE LIFE OP CHRIST.
challenge, as a mere method of stopping the mouths of the chal-
lengers, that "Jesus answered and said unto them, I will also ask you
one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I
do these things: The baptism of John, was it from heaven? or of
men? answer me." Jesus refers to the baptism of John as contain-
ing within itself a sufficient reply to their inquiries. If they acknowl-
edged it as divine, they must also recognize his authority as divine ;
for John had openly and repeatedly pointed to him as the Messiah,
the greater than he, whose shoe-latchet he was not worthy to
unloose. First, then, he must have from them a confession as to
the true character of the Baptist's ministry. This they are unpre-
pared to give. Though really and in their hearts rejecting it, they
had never openly discredited John's claim to be a prophet sent by
God. They had managed to keep the people in ignorance of what
they thought. They had not needed to interfere to check the career
of the Baptist. Herod had done their work for them in his case.
John had been removed, and they were willing enough it should be
thought that they participated in the popular belief. They felt at
once the difficulty of the dilemma in which the question of Jesus
involved them. Should they say, as was naturally to be expected
they should, that John's baptism was from heaven, Jesus would
have it in his power to say, f Why then did ye not believe him when
he testified of me ? If he was from heaven then so am I, my min-
istry and his being so wrapped together, that together they stand or
together they fall.' Such was the instant use to which Jesus could
turn a present acknowledgment on their part of the divine origin
and authority of the Baptist's ministry, convicting them at once of
the plainest and grossest inconsistency. They were not prepared to
stand convicted of this in presence of the people, now stirred to
intense anxiety as they watched the progress of this collision. But
as little were they prepared to face the storm that they would
raise by an open denial of the heavenly origin of the Baptist's
mission; and so to Christ's pointed interrogation, their only answer,
after reasoning among themselves, is, "We cannot tell." It wao
false ; they could at least have told what they themselves believed.
They could, but dared not; and so by this piece of cowardice and
hypocrisy they forfeit the title to have any other or fuller satisfaction
given them as to the nature and origin of that authority which
Jesus exercised, beyond that which was already in their hands.
"And Jesus answering saith unto them, Neither do I tell you by
what authority I do these things." Mark 11 : 33.
Scarcely prepared for having the tables turned so quickly and
PARABLE OF THE TWO SONS. 513
thoroughly upon them, ilie scribes and chief priests and elders
stand crestfallen before the Lord. He has them now in hand, nor
will he lose the last opportunity of telling them what they are,
and what he knows they have resolved to do. About to pronounce
over them his fearful anathemas, when all the word-battles of this
troubled day are over, he will force them now beforehand to spread
out with their own hands the grounds upon which those anathemas
were to rest. Out of their own mouths will he condemn them. This
is done by a skilful use of parable ; the same kind of use that
Nathan made of it when he got David to judge and condemn his
own conduct. "But what think ye?" says Jesus to them, as if ho
were introducing a wholly new topic: "A certain man had two sons;
and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to-day in my
vineyard. He answered and said, I will not; but afterwards he
repented, and went. He came to the second, and said likewise ; and
he answered and said, I go, sir; but went not. Whether of them
twain did the will of his father?" Little suspecting the real drift of
this short and simple story, and rather relieved than otherwise by the
question, as getting them out of their embarrassment and covering
their fall, they say unto him at once, "The first;" the one who said
he would not, yet who went. Then came the moral and applica-
tion of the tale: "Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the
harlots go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came
unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not ; but
the publicans and the harlots believed him : and ye, when ye had
seen it, repented not afterward that ye might believe him." It was
the treatment given to John and to his ministry that Jesus had been
setting forth in the conduct of the two sons to their father. They,
the chief priests and elders of the people, were the second son;
and those publicans and harlots, who repented at the preaching of
the Baptist, were the first. It was bad enough to ha^e the veil of
hypocrisy behind which they had tried to screen themselves torn
aside; to have their unbelief in the Baptist proclaimed upon the
housetops. It was worse to have publicans and hailots preferred
before them, the preference grounded upon their own verdict. But
they have still more to hed,r, still more to bear. Jesus had been
comparing them, to their great chagrin, with some of the lowest of
their own times. His eye now takes a wider range. He looks back
to the treatment which these men's forefathers had given to messen-
ger after messenger of the Most High, and he looks forward to that
which they, fit sons of such sires, were about to give himself; and
bringing the past, the present, and the future into the picture, he
UtoofOhrtit 33
514 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
tells of a vineyard well fenced, well furnished, let out to husband-
men; of servant after servant sent to receive its fruits; of one of
thern being beaten, another stoned, another killed, till the owner of
the vineyard having "one son, his well beloved," at last sends him,
saying, "They will reverence my son." But the wicked husbandmen,
ivhen he comes, take and kill him, and cast him out of the vineyard,
"What then," says Jesus, "shall the lord of the vineyard, when he
cometh, do unto those husbandmen?" This question is addressed to
the people, and not to the chief priests and scribes, to whom, as St.
Luke (chap. 20:9) tells us, the parable was spoken; and they, not
looking perhaps beyond the simple incidents of the tale, say, "He will
come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard to
others." But why are the chief priests and the elders forced, as unwill-
ingly they are, to remain standing there in Christ's presence with a
great crowd around them? what are they thinking of this second
story? what will they now say? Scarcely has Christ begun to speak
of the vineyard and its fence, and its wine-press, ere Isaiah's vine-
yard — a type, they knew, of the house of Israel — recurs to their mem-
ory; and as messenger after messenger is spoken of as despatched,
what could those be but the prophets whom the Lord had sent unto
their forefathers ? Already a strong suspicion that this tale also is
to be brought to bear against them has entered into their minds — a
suspicion that is turned into a certainty as Christ proceeds to speak
of the owner of the vineyard as a father having an only and well-
beloved son, just such a son as Jesus had always claimed to be to
God, and as he went on to represent the seizure and the death of
that son, the very deed they already had resolved to do. In these
husbandmen they see themselves; in their doom, whatever it may
be, they see their own.
"While the people, then, in ready answer to Christ's question,
speak out the natural verdict of the unbiased conscience, and say,
"He will destroy the husbandmen, and give the vineyard unto others,"
they, as they hear such a heavy sentence passed, almost involuntarily
exclaim, "God forbid." Jesus looks at them as they utter this vehe-
ment disclaimer, and says : "What is this then that is written? Did
ye never read in the Scriptures, The stone which the builders
rejected, the same is become the head of the corner : this is the
Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?" Christ quotes here
from the 118th Psalm, a psalm familiar to the Jews as pointing
throughout to their Messiah; so familiar, that it was from it that
those salutations were taken by which Christ on his entry into the
city had been hailed by the common people two days before, as well
THE CORNKE-STONE. 515
as those liosannas to the Son of David which the children had
repeated the next day in the temple, the echoes of which must still
have been ringing somewhat unpleasantly in the ears of the chief
priests and the rulers. Jesus wishes by this quotation to carry on
as it were the prophecy of the parable; to show what would be the
loom inflicted upon the perpetrators of that dark deed, the minder
of the Father's only and well-beloved Son. That Son was to be
himself the inflicter of this doom; but as he in the parable was dead,
etnd could not be represented as a living agent, the image of the
vineyard is dropped, and another is introduced, fitting in however
with the other, the rejecters of the stone being the same with the
husbandmen of the vineyard. The chief priests might have some
little difficulty in seeing how it was that in speaking about the cor-
ner-stone Jesus was but carrying on the same history a step or two
beyond the point at which the parable, by the necessity of its struc-
ture, had stopped. Any such difficulty was at once removed by
Christ's dropping for a moment all allegory, all imagery: "Therefore
I say unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and
given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof." Matt. 21 : 43.
They can mistake no longer; the kingdom is to be taken from them;
as the occupants of the vineyard, they are to be ejected. But is this
all? does this exhaust their doom? What about that doom may this
new image of the stone convey? "Whosoever shall fall on this stone
shall be broken, but on whomsoever it shall fall it will grind him to
powder." First the stone is passive, suffering all kinds of rough
usage to be heaped upon it, avenging itself the while for all the
insults offered by causing those who offer them to stumble over it,
and fall and be broken. But at last, as if invested with some inner
living power, or as if lifted and wielded by some invisible but all-
powerful hand, it becomes active, gets into motion, lifts itself up, and
with a crushing weight descends upon its despisers and grinds them
to powder. Such was Christ to that commonwealth of the Jews, to
that proud theocracy of which the men before him were the head.
By the Great Architect he had been laid of old in Zion, the chief
foundation of the great spiritual edifice to be reared out of the ruins
of the Fall. For many a generation he had been a stone of stumbling
and a rock of offence. All these wrongs of the past he passively
had borne, and now in his own person he is to submit to reproach
and suffering and death ; but the hour that was to see him exalted
because of this, and proclaimed to be the head of the corner, was to
see him coming also in judgment. He was to arise out of his place ;
he was to pour contempt on his despisers; utter desolation was to
516 THE LIFE OF CHRIST
come upon the city and people of the Jews. The stone wa3 to
fall upon it, and it was in truth a very grinding of that land to
powder, when every vestige of its ancient institutions was swept
away, its people perished in multitudes, and the remnant, scattered
over all the earth, was as the dust which the wind drives to and fro.
What Jesus was to the Jews, he is in a certain sense to all.
Primarily and mainly, he is set before us as the one and only true
and broad and firm foundation on which to build our hopes ; a foun-
dation open and easy of access, no guarding fence around it, so near
that a single step is all that is needed to plant us on it, broad
enough for all to stand upon, and firm enough to sustain the weight
of the whole world's dependence. Such is Christ to all who go to
him in humility, in simplicity, in child-like trust, resting upon him
and upon him only for their forgiveness and acceptance with God.
But such he may not be, he is not, to all. The very stone, so elect
and precious to some, to others may be a stone of stumbling and a
rock of offence. There before us all, in the broad highway of life, it
lies. It will bear now unmoved and unprovoked any treatment that
you may give. But it shall not remain so for ever; and woe to
him who, having despised and rejected it all through life, shall see
it darkening above his head, descending to crush. It were hettej
for that man that he had never been born !
IV.
The Marriage of the King's Son — Question as to
the Tribute- Money.*
TUESDAY.
Having repelled the challenge to state and to produce the author-
ity upon which he was acting, Jesus had addressed first to the
challengers the parable of the two sons, and then to the people
the parable of the wicked husbandmen. In both of these parables
the conduct of his rejecters had been exposed, and the fate in store
for them foretold. Yet another parable was added, intended to
complete that picture of the future which Jesus would hold ap
before their eyes. This parable, the last addressed by our Lord
to the people at large, was partly a repetition, partly an expansion
* Matt. 22 : 1-22 : Mark 12 : 13-17 ; Luke 20 : 20-26.
THE MARRIAGE OF THE KING'S SON, 517
of the one delivered some time before in Persea, on the occasion
of an entertainment given to Christ by a chief Pharisee, and which
is recorded in the Mth chapter of the Gospel of St. Luke. It is
interesting to notice the differences between the two, corresponding
so accurately, as they do, with the differences of time and circum-
Itances under which they were spoken. When the first was uttered,
the hostility of the hierarchy, though deep and deadly, was latent.
The certain man, therefore, who makes a supper, and sends out his
servant to tell them that were bidden to come, for all things were
now ready, has nothing more to complain of than that his messenger
and his message were both treated with neglect. With more or less
courteousness, more or less decision of purpose, more or less implied
preference for other engagements, the invitation was refused. And
the penalty visited upon this refusal was simply exclusion from the
banquet. V For I say unto you that none of those men which were
bidden shall taste of my supper."
In the second parable, the guilt of the first invited guests is
greater, the penalty more severe. The certain man who makes &
feast becomes a king, invitations issuing from whom had all the
character of commands. And it is for no common purpose that
the royal banquet is prepared. It is for a great state occasion; to
celebrate a great state event. Even therefore had the king's invita-
tion met with no other or different reception from that given to
the invitation of the householder, a much higher guilt had been
involved in declining it ; for a royal banquet made under such
circumstances had something in it of a public or political character.
To make light of an invitation to such a banquet, to plead any of
the events or duties or engagements of ordinary life as a reason
for declinature and absence, would not only be in the highest degree
discourteous, it would have a taint of treason in it, an element of
disloyalty and rebellion.
In the one case a single servant is sent forth, and when he tells
the bidden guests to come, for all things are now ready, with one
consent they begin to make excuse; but there is nothing of con-
tempt or malignity displayed towards either the provider of the
feast or the servant who bears the summons. There is an apparent
desire to make out something like a good excuse. In the second
parable the king sends out not one, but a band of servants, who
meet with a flat refusal. Other servants are sent forth, not to
punish, not to announce the king's purpose to exclude, but to renew
the invitation — to entreat the refusers to reconsider their resolution.
Some make light of it, treat this second invitation with even greater
518 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
disrespect than the first; while others are so provoked that they
take the messengers, spitefully entreat them, and slay them. Is it
wonderful that the wrath of the king should in consequence of this
be so much greater than that of the simple householder; that he
should treat the heavier offence with a deeper mark of displeasure
than mere exclusion from his presence and his table ? " He sends
forth his armies and destroys these murderers, and burns up their
city."
This bringing in of armies, this mention of a city and its destruc-
tion, at once calls up to our thoughts the ruin hovering over Jeru-
salem, and teaches us to connect the parable of the marriage-feast
with that of the wicked husbandmen; both intended to set forth
the terrible punishment of the Jewish people — the taking of the
kingdom from them, and the giving it to others. In the closing
part, however, of the latter parable — -that which speaks of the new
guests brought in from the highways, and the king coming in and
detecting the man without the wedding-garment— it goes beyond
the former; it points not to Jewish but to Christian times. And
it should fix our attention all the more upon the closing section
of the parable, that while in all the other teachings of our Lord
during his last day in the temple, strict regard was had to the
audience that was then before him — to the events that were so soon
to transpire in Jerusalem and Judea — he casts here a prophetic
glance upon the ages that were to succeed the fall of the Jewish
theocracy — as if he could not pass away from his pre-intimation
of the forfeiture of the kingdom by the sons of Abraham without
warning those who were to be brought in to take their place, that
a no less watchful eye would be upon them as they sat down at the
provided banquet, that the badge of loyalty without and the spirit
of true loyalty within would be required of all, and that the want
of it would incur a penalty not less heavy than that visited on their
predecessors, the chief priests, the scribes, the elders.
Their wrath at the speaker knew no bounds. They would have
laid hold of him and borne him off to inflict the condign punish-
ment that in their eyes he so fully merited. But they feared the
people. They were not sure of the temper of the crowd by which
they were surrounded, not sure how far they would be supported by
the Roman authorities. Outwardly curbing, inwardly nursing their
wrath, they withdraw to try another method. They have been
baffled in the attempt openly to confront him; but could they not
entangle him in his talk by some crafty questions, and force from
him an answer that might supply material for accusation, "that so
QUESTION AS TO THE TRIBUTE-MONEY. 519
they might deliver him unto the power and authority of the gov-
ernor"? Luke 20:20. Leaving some of their underlings to v»atch
him, so as to be ready to report all he says and does, they retire
to hold a secret conclave. They call the Herodians into council,
wliom they find quite willing to combine with them in the execution
of any plan that promised to prevail against the man whom, they
equally hate. The deliberation is brief. A step at once suggests
itself that cannot but succeed, which, one way or other, is certain
to damage, if not utterly to ruin, their common enemy. The chief
priests, however, and scribes, and elders, the leading men who have
just had that humiliating colloquy with him, will not go themselves
to carry out this well-concocted scheme. They have had enough
of personal collision. They will not venture again into his presence,
to be taunted and maligned before the people. It is besides a
very low and hypocritical piece of work that is to be done, and
they commit it to other hands, who take with them some of these
Herodians, to give the matter less of a purely Pharisaic character.
Having got their instructions, these emissaries approach Jesus,
feigning themselves to be sincere men, bent upon ascertaining what
their duty is. And when they come they say to him, " Master, we
know that thou art true, and carest for no man, for thou regardest
not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth"— a
very insidious piece of flattery, a great part of its power lying
in the apparent honesty with which the men who offer it embrace
themselves among the number of those for whom they are sure that
Jesus will not care; a kind of flattery consisting in attributing to
the person flattered a superiority to flattery, to which, if well admin-
istered, our weak humanity is peculiarly susceptible. With this
artful preface, which they hope will tempt him to speak boldly
out the answer that may suit them, they say, "Master, is it lawful
to give tribute to Caesar, or not? Shall we give, or shall we not
give ?" It is not the expediency but the lawfulness of paying the
tribute exacted by the Romans, that they ask about. That lawful-
ness was denied by many who, under the force and pressure of
necessity, yet paid the tax. The Pharisees themselves, who owed
much of their power and popularity to their faithful adherence to
the principles of the old Jewish theocracy, disputed the lawfulness
of the exaction. They took their stand here upon a very plain
declaration of Moses : " Thou shalt in any wise set him king over
ihee whom the Lord thy God shall choose; one from among thy
brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou may est not set a
stranger over thee, which is not thy brother." Deut. 17:15. When
520 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the Herodian family, one not of Jewish but of Iduinean extraction,
backed by the power of Borne, took possession of the throne of
Judea, the entire Jewish Sanhedrim, appealing to this scripture,
protested against what they rightly enough regarded as a violation
of the Mosaic law. Their protest, however, was unavailing. The
firs I two Herods were kept upon the throne by the Roman emperors,
whose policy it then was through them to rule Judea. Ere long
indeed, and this happened during our Saviour's life, the mask was
dropped. The sovereignty of Judea was directly assumed by the
Romans. One or other of its northern provinces was given to one
of the Herods, who governed it under the title of tetrarch or king;
but Judea proper was placed under a Roman procurator. Such a
method of foreign rule was still more obnoxious to the Jewish
people than the government of the Herods, who, though by descent
Idumean, had by intermarriage with Jewish families won for them-
selves something like a Jewish title. It was the policy, and we
have no doubt it was the honest principle of the Pharisees, secretly
to foster the general and deep, but repressed and smouldering oppo-
sition to the Roman rule. Distinguished as a religious party for
their extreme and punctilious attachment to the ceremonialism of
the Jewish law, as a political party they won golden opinions of the
people by standing in the vanguard as upholders of the national
independence. Among the many political questions which the state
of the country raised, was one about the payment of the poll-tax
imposed by the foreign governors. Arguing from the premise that
the whole foundation of the Roman authority was hollow, grounded
on usurpation and incapable of defence, the leading political Phar-
isees vehemently denied the legality of the imposition. The Hero-
dians, the defenders of the legitimacy of the Herodian dynasty,
could not well deny the justice of the Roman claim to civil suprem-
acy, as it had been by the Roman power that the dynasty which
they supported had been instituted. Yet among them there were
many who bore no good will to the Italian conquerors, and who
looked to the rule of the Herods as the best protection against an
entirely foreign domination — the best preservative of something like
a separate and independent national existence. Such kind of Hero-
dians perhaps they were ^sdio now associated themselves with the
Pharisees in putting the question to Jesus — "Master, is it lawful
to give tribute to Caesar or not? Shall we give, or shall we not
give f
They think that they have shut him up; no door seems open to
evade or to decline an answer. A simple affirmative or a simple
QUESTION AS TO THE TRIBUTE-MONEY. 521
negative rffust be given. On either side, the difficulty and the
danger to Jesus seem nearly equal. If he shall say it is lawful
to give tribute to Caesar, his favor with the people is gone; his
pretensions to be the Messiah are scattered to the winds; from
being an object of attraction and attachment he becomes an object
of alienation and contempt. Should he, on the other hand, say, as
they fondly hope he will that it is not lawful, the weapon is at once
put into their hands which they can use against him with fatal
effect. They have but to report him to Pilate as a stirrer-up of
sedition, and prove their charge by his own declaration made in
the presence of the people. But they are not prepared for the
manner in which the insidious question is to be dealt with. " Why
tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?" said Jesus; "show me a penny"™
the coin in common circulation. There were two kinds of money
at that time in use among the Jews — the Roman, by which all the
common business of life was transacted, and in which the capitation-
tax, about which the question that had been raised, was paid ;
and the old Jewish, still partially employed, and in which especially
the temple tax was paid. They bring him one of the Roman coins —
a denarius. He looks at it and says, "Whose image and super-
scription is this?" They say to him, "Caesar's." He says to them,
"Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the thinga
that are God's."
Jjj this singular and short reply the hypocrisy and the incon-
sistency of his questioners are at once exposed. The mere payment
of the tribute is but a secondary matter after all. The true, the
great question was, Should the Roman rule be submitted to or not?
was it or was it not lawful to submit to that authority, to bear
the foreign yoke? This question the Jewish people and these
Pharisees, their most influential leaders, had suffered so far to be
decided. They had yielded to and accepted the foreign yoke.
There was this manifest token of subjection, that Roman money was
circulating among them as the common and accepted coin of the
realm. It was an acknowledged maxim, it. had become a rabbinical
proverb, that the coin of a country tells who is its king. Things
being in that state in Judea, it was an idle, it was a deceitful, it was
a base and malignant thing, to come to Jesus and try to force from
him such a decision upon that isolated point of the payment of the
tox as would involve him with the Roman authorities. Let those
who thought Caesar was a usurper, and were prepared to cast off
his authority, raise at once the standard of rebellion, and try the
hazard of a civil war. Let those who, holding the existing govern-
522 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
ment to be illegitimate, thought at the same time that matters were
not ripe for open resistance, bide their time, and mature their meas-
ures as well and as secretly as they pleased ; but let not any, like
these Pharisees and Herodians, while fawning upon the Eoinan
governor, and forward in all the outward expressions of submission,
pretend to have any difficulty about the payment of the tax; above
all, let them not, while trying to keep up their own power and
popu 1 arity by letting it be understood that they sympathized with
the people in their opposition to the foreign rule, try to inveigle
one who from the first had stood aloof and declined to take any
part whatever in the political dissensions of the country, so as to
accuse him to the governor, and have him condemned and executed
for that which, neither in their own eyes, nor in that of the great
majority of their fellow-countrymen, was accounted as a crime.
Coupling it with his demand for a sight of the Roman coin, and
his pointing to the image and superscription stamped thereon, I
have no doubt that those of Christ's auditors would have been right
who interpreted the first part of Christ's answer, " Eender to Caesar
the things that are Caesar's," as implying that it was lawful to pay
the tribute-money; right and consistent — so long as Caesar or any
one was acknowledged as king, and the money from his mint taken
and employed — that the tribute levied by him should be paid; the
duty of obedience springing from the fact of the existing dominion.
But there can be as little doubt that those also of that audience
would have been right who interpreted the second part of Christ's
answer, "Eender to God the things that are God's," as carrying with
it a severe and most merited rebuke of his questioners. For had
they but fulfilled that acknowledged obligation, had they been but
true to the spirit and laws of their own ancient government, no
Eoman soldier had ever invaded their borders, no Eoman governor
had sat in the Hall of Judgment at Jerusalem. It was their own
failure in rendering to God the things that were his, a failure of
which Pharisees and Herodians had alike been guilty, which had
reduced their country to bondage; and now to be wrangling about
the narrow question of the paying of the tribute, what was it but
as if the men who by some act and deed had exposed themselves
to the infliction of a certain penalty, were to sit down and discuss
on abstract grounds the legitimacy of the authority by which that
penalty was enacted ?
Considering Christ's answer in its immediate bearings upon those
who then stood before him, it is not difficult to see how completely
it availed to silence his questioners, and to put it out of the power
QUESTION AS TO THE TK1BUTE-MONEY. 523
of any of the parties there represented to turn it against him. They
could only marvel at him, and hold their peace.
But separating this memorable saying of Christ from the par-
ticular circumstances under which it was uttered, and the immediate
object it was intended to subserve, let us look at it as an aphorism
of infinite wisdom, thrown into that proverbial form that gives it so
easy and so strong a hold upon the memory, and promulgated for
the universal guidance of mankind. " Bender unto Caesar the things
that are Caesar's ; unto God the things that are God's." Both
precepts may and ought to be obeyed. There need not be, there
ought not to be, any discord or collision between them. Christ
would not have imposed the double obligation had there been any
natural or necessary conflict between the two. Each may be met
and fully satisfied, the other being left entire and uninvaded. It
ought never to keep a man from rendering all due obedience to
his earthly sovereign, that he is faithful in his allegiance to him
who is King of kings and Lord of lords. It ought never to keep
him from serving aright his Heavenly King, that he has an earthly
one to whom honor and obedience are due. It would be to
misinterpret altogether the golden rule of Christ, to regard it as
if it set before us two masters, both of whom we were called to
serve, the one having authority in one region and over so much
ground, the other having authority over quite a different region
and within quite different limits, whose claims might occasionally
become competing and conflicting. In rendering to Caesar the
things that righteously are Caesar's, we can never be keeping from
God the things that righteously are God's. And if the things
that are God's be duly and fully rendered, Caesar shall get what
is his as one of the very things that God requires at our hands.
The second precept, in fact, embraces the first as the greater covers
the less.
Let it, however, be at once acknowledged, that rich and full
of wisdom as the saying of our Lord is, it appears to fail in appli-
cation; for is not, it may be said, the very point upon which we
especially need guidance, left by it vague and undecided? What
are the things that are Caesar's? What are the things that are
God's? How far in each case can and may we go? Where in
each case ought we to stop? A line of demarcation it is thought
there must be here between the two sets of obligations, the two
kinds of duty and of service. But the adage does not help us to
lay it down. Now, strange as it may appear, it is the very absence
of any such precise and definite directory as the one thus craved
524 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
for, its careful avoidance of drawing any separating line between
our civil and political duties on the one hand, and our religious
ones on the other, which, to our view, stamps it with the signature
of a wisdom that is divine. Christ does not define what we are
to do, or what we are to refuse to do, in order to render to Caesar
Ihe things that are Caesar's. No; but he gives us to understand
that these never can be, or at least never ought to be, such as to
interfere in the slightest degree with the higher duty we owe to
God. He does not define what we are to do, or what not to do,
in order to render to God the things that are his. No; but he
gives us to understand that these never are or can be such as to
interfere in the slightest degree with the dutiful obedience that
we owe to kings and to all that are in authority over us. "We are
not, under the cloak of being faithful to Caesar, to become disobe-
dient to God. We are not, under the cloak of being obedient to
God, to be unfaithful to our earthly ruler. And if, with equal
singleness of eye, equal purity of motive, we make it equally a
matter of conscience to keep both the precepts that he has linked
together, no discord shall arise, no need of dividing lines be felt.
I believe it to be impossible logically to define, so as absolutely
to distinguish from one another, our social and political duties from
our religious ones. To look only at a single section of the wide
domain : when church and state have come into conflict, the
attempt has always failed, I believe must ever fail, to mark off
the boundary-line between them, and to say exactly and all along
the line where the authority of the one ends, and that of the other
begins. Collisions, unhappily, have arisen. The past is full of
them: no darker chapters in the history of our race than those
in which the record of these conflicts is preserved. But how has
this come about ? From kings becoming tyrants : from their forget-
ting that they, and all their subjects along with them, should render
to God the things that are God's; which cannot be done unless the
rights of the individual conscience be respected, and each man left
free to believe and worship as that conscience dictates; from priests
becoming kings, from their forgetting that Christ's kingdom is not
of this world, and that it was never meant to be so administered as
to call in the aids of earthly power — to use those instruments which
earthly sovereigns are alone entitled to employ.
On both sides here the deepest wrongs have been done, the
foulest crimes committed. The august name of royalty has been
abused, to trample upon the still more sacred rights of conscience.
[t was abused when the proud monarch of Babylon raised the golden
SPIEITUAL DESPOTISM. 525
image in the plain of Dura, and issued his order that all people and
nations should worship it; it was abused when Darius signed the
writing and issued the decree that no man should present any peti-
tion to God or man for thirty days, but to himself; it was abused
when the rulers of the Jews summoned Peter and John before them,
and straitly charged them that they should speak no more of Jesus
to the people; it was abused when the emperor of Germany called
Martin Luther before the Diet, and commanded him to retract the
faith that he had derived from the sacred oracles; it was abused
when the Stuarts prescribed to the Covenanters of Scotland the man-
ner in which they were to worship God, and treated all who refused
compliance with their ordinances as rebels against the throne, per-
secuting them even unto death. We cannot count Daniel, Sha-
drach, Meshach, and Abednego, the apostles of our Lord, Luther,
the Scottish Covenanters, as violators of the precept, "Render unto
Caesar the things that are Caesar's," because at cost or peril of their
lives they heroically resolved to obey God rather than man.
The sacred name of religion has also been abused. It was
abused when Cromwell taught his men to see in their enemies the
enemies of the Lord, and claimed the divine sanction for all the
slaughter effected by the swords of his Ironsides; it was abused
when he who arrogated to himself the title of God's vicegerent upoc
earth, raised himself above all earthly sovereigns, took it on him to
sit in judgment upon their titles to their crowns, dethroned princes
at his pleasure, and released subjects from allegiance to their lawful
kings. It was still more awfully abused when spiritual offenders
against the church — those w T ho believed not as she would have them
to believe, worshipped not as she would have them Worship — were
treated as criminals, to be punished by the sword, and the civil
power was called on to enforce the spiritual sentence, and many a
dungeon witnessed the torture, and many a death-pile was raised,
and many a martyr-spirit w r as chased up through the fires to its
place beneath the altar.
Fanatics on the one hand, and despots on the other, have sadly
traversed the Saviour's golden rule, and in doing so have only
taught us how difficult a thing it is for weak humanity, when under
the blinding influence of prejudice and passion, to bear in mind the
double precept of our Lord: "Render to Caesar the things that arc
Caesar's: to God the things that are God's."
526 THE i^±FE OF CHEIST.
Question of the Sadducees as to the Resurrec-
tion of the Dead.*
TUESDAY.
Baffled and exposed by Christ's answer as to the payment
of the tribute-money, the Pharisees retire. And now their great
rivals, the Sadducees, take the field, and try to entangle Jesus in
his talk. Though constituting a powerful party, it is not till the
closing scene of the Saviour's life that the Sadducees appear to have
taken any active part against him. It was alien from their disposi-
tion to interfere with any popular religious movement till it took
such shape as made it in their eyes dangerous to the state, and
then they did not scruple summarily to quench it. They looked
with a haughty contempt upon what they regarded as the ground-
less beliefs and idle superstitious practices of the great bulk of their
countrymen. In common with them they believed indeed in the
divine origin of the Jewish faith, restricted as they took that faith
to be mainly to the announcement that there was but one God ?
the God of Israel, in opposition to all idolatry. They admitted the
divine authority of the laws and institutions of Moses, whom they
especially honored as their great heaven-sent and heaven-instructed
lawgiver. But they rejected the whole of that oral tradition which
had grown up around the primitive Mosaic revelation, which had
come generally to be regarded, and was especially defended by the
Pharisees, as of equal authority with it. They accepted the other
books of the Old Testament as well as the Pentateuch, but there
seems good reason to believe that they held the latter in peculiar
and pre-eminent esteem. In their interpretation of the Pentateuch
they adhered rigidly to the letter, rejecting all the false glosses and
elaborate explanations and inferences which the Pharisaic Rabbis
had introduced. Into their religious creed the Sadducees would
admit nothing which Moses had not directly and unambiguously
announced. True to their character as the freethinkers or rational-
ists of their age and nation, they were incredulous as to any other
existences or powers influencing human affairs beyond those that
lay open to the observation of their senses. They did not — as
professed disciples of Moses they could not — repudiate the agencv
* Matt. 22 : 23-33 ; Mark 12 : 18-27 ; Luke 20 : 27-40.
QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. 527
of God as exerted in the creation and government of the world.
But they limited that agency to a general supervision and control
which left full scope to human volition and human effort, which they
regarded as the chief factors in the unfolding of events. So far aa
their professed faith would let them, they were materialists. The}
acknowledged the existence of one great Spirit. They could not
deny that beings called angels had occasionally, in the early times
whose history was recorded by Moses, appeared to take some part
in earthly affairs. But, disbelieving in the existence of any other
spirit save that of the Supreme, whatever their explanation of these
angelic manifestations, it was one that left them at liberty to deny,
as they did, that there was any permanent and separate order of
beings called angels standing between men and God. They said
that there was "no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit." Acts
23 : 8. They believed in the soul of man only as exhibited in and by
the body which enshrined it; with that body it perished at death.
The future state, a world of rewards and punishments hereafter
for the things now done in the body, was but a dream. To speak
of the resurrection of the body at some after period was a solecism.
There was no spirit for it to be reunited with. It might please
God, out of the materials that had once formed one human body, to
make another like it, and to plant in it another soul; but there was
there could be, no real resurrection of the dead, no rising to life
again of the same beings that had been buried. If such a thing
could be, and were actually to take place, the beings so raised would
return (as they imagined) to the same kind of life as that which
previously had been theirs; and from the very absurdities and con-
tradictions which would be implied in this, they drew many an
argument against the popular belief in a resurrection, which those
adhering to that belief, holding it as they did in a very gross and
materialist fashion, were unable to meet.
How did such men look upon Jesus Christ? Perhaps in the
first instance as a weak but harmless enthusiast, little worth their
notice, or worth only a smile or a scoff. His teaching, so far as
it was reported to them, or they knew anything about it, was utterly
distasteful to them; it was animated by a spirit totally the reverse
of theirs; it was full of faith in the invisible. In it the spiritual, the
future, the eternal, not only enwrapped but absorbed the present,
the temporary, the sensible. God was no longer a mere name for
a remote and inaccessible Being, who sat aloof upon a throne oi
exalted supremacy. He was a Father, continually engaged in guid-
ing, protecting, providing; clothing the lilies of the field; feeding
528 THE LIJFE OF CHRIST.
the fowls of the air; causing his sun to shine; sending his rain from
heaven: caring for all the creatures of his power, all the children
of his love. No thought was to be taken for the body as compared
with that which should be taken for the soul. The world beyond
the present stood out in vivid perspective and relief. The angels
of God were represented as rejoicing there over each sinner that
repented on earth, and the spirits of the dead as waiting to welcome
each brother spirit as it passed up to its place beside them in the
heavens.
How the Sadducees regarded the miracles of our Lord it is
difficult to say. They would regard his feeding of the hungry and
his curing of the diseased either as impositions, or exercises of some
occult power of which he had become possessed. But when he
pretended to cast out devils and to raise the dead, his miracles came
into direct collision with their unbelief, and awakened more than
incredulity — stirred up malignity. He was in their eyes a base
and bad man who could thus deceive the people. If he would
prove that he came from God, let some sign direct from God be
given. The only occasion on which, during the course of our Sa-
viour's ministry, the Sadducees interfered with him, was when they
once joined the Pharisees in demanding from him a sign from
heaven. They got signs enough, some of them wrought under their
own eyes, as in the healing of the man born blind, and in the
raising of Lazarus, but signs which only increasingly exasperated
them, so that when they saw that the movement created by Jesus
was assuming politically so threatening an aspect, they were quite
willing at last to league with the Pharisees, and assist in removing
him; for it was better, so said one of themselves, that one man
should die than that the whole nation should perish. Parties to the
recent resolution come to by the Sanhedrim, the Sadducees were
watching with as jealous eyes as the Pharisees all that was taking
place in the courts of the temple. Though conspiring with them in
their design, it may have been with some degree of secret com-
placency that they noticed how in the word-battle about the tribute-
money he had foiled the rival sect. They have a question of their
own, however, with which, as they fancy, he will find it more difficult
to deal; one with which they had often pressed their adversaries,
and to which they had never got any satisfactory reply. They
will see how Jesus will deal with it. If he agree with them, then
adieu to his power with the people; if he fail to answer, what a
triumph both over him and all credulous believers in a resurrection !
They state their case and propose their query. Moses had
QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. 529
commanded that if a Jew died childless, leaving a widow, his brother
should marry her, and had ruled that the child of the second mar-
riage should be reckoned as the heir of the brother predeceased.
There were seven brothers, they told Jesus, who all died, each
having been successively the husband of the same woman; and last
of all the woman died: "in the resurrection, therefore," they say
to him, very confidently — somewhat coarsely and contemptuously —
" whose wife shall she be of the seven? " Christ's answer is direct
and emphatic. " Ye do err," he says, " not knowing the Scriptures,
nor the power of God." His charge against them is not one of
hypocrisy, but of error, of wrong belief, that error having a twofold
source: 1. Their ignorance of the meaning of the Scriptures, of that
very book of Moses from which they had quoted; 2. Their ignorance
of the power of God, of the manner of its exercise generally, and,
more particularly, of the way in which it should be exercised in
effecting that resurrection which they denied. Taking these sources
of error in inverse order, Jesus first unfolds wherein their error
as to the power of God consisted. They looked upon it too much
as a mere force, illimitable, indeed, yet fixed, unvarying, working
now as it had ever done before, to work hereafter even as it was
working now. They failed to recognise it as the forthputting of
the energy of a living Being who was ever thereby embodying his
will, expressing his purposes, executing his plans — the very same
error as to the power of God which lies at the root of a large part
of our modern infidelity, traceable, as it easily is, up to a denial
of the personal agency of a Being who has plans and purposes and
a will of which the whole creation is but a constant and gradual
development. But, still more particularly, the Sadducees had erred
in limiting the future manifestations of the power of God, in imagin-
ing that if the dead were to rise again, they were to live subject
to the same conditions, united to each other by the same relation-
ships with those that now exist. Prior to the incarnation, very little
beyond the bare fact that there was to be a resurrection of the
dead had been revealed. Had any right conceptions of the char-
acter and power of the great Creator been entertained, preparing
the mind that entertained them for an endless variety in the future
as we now know that there has been in the past, the very nature of
the fact, apart from all further information about it, that there was
to be hereafter a general resurrection of the dead, should have stifled
in the birth such an idle objection as that which these Sadducees
were urging; for, come how it might, let it be attended with what-
ever other outward changes in the physical condition of our globe,
Life of Christ. 34
530 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
it was in itself a change too great to allow of any ideas borrowed
from the present condition of things being transferred to that new
state of which it must form the initial stage. But Jesus goes a step
farther than this: he puts his hand forward partially to lift the veil,
and tell somewhat of the nature and the extent to which these
changes will be carried which the resurrection will involve. "And
Jesus, answering, said unto them, The children of this world marry,
and are given in marriage : but they which shall be accounted worthy
to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither
marry, nor are given in marriage: neither can they die any more:
for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God,
being the children of the resurrection. " Luke 20 : 34-36. This
much is told us here; that great changes are in store for us; that
out of the grave a new economy is to arise, elevated in all its condi-
tions and relationships above that under which we now dwell. But
how much also remains untold; how much to check that prurient
curiosity with which we are tempted to pry into the future, and extort
from it its secrets !
We have got in the Bible two brief sketches which none but the
finger of God could have drawn, a sketch of the beginning and a
sketch of the end of the world as it now is. The one, the picture
of the past, the story of the creation, how very difficult has it been
for us to decipher it; how slowly are we spelling out its meaning;
how much of it still remains obscure; how utterly should we have
failed in interpreting it aright, had it not so happened that, in these
later years, we have got access to other records, also somewhat
dim as yet, which the events as they occurred stamped enduringly
upon the solid rocks. Now if the scriptural picture of the past
was so dark and so difficult to understand, was in our hands so
long misunderstood and misinterpreted, how can we expect it to be
otherwise with the scriptural picture of the future, which tells of a
coming epoch more unlike the present than is the present to any
epoch of the past? How wise then and becoming for us, till the
events occur that shall yield the true interpretation, to confine our-
selves to the simple and general truths that lie upon the face of
those figurative descriptions of the future state which abound in
the Bible, and which ought never to be treated as literally and
historically true. How vain to use what were meant only to be
obscure hints, as stepping-stones from which fancy may safely mount
and soar away at random. Let us be satisfied with the little that
we can now know. It doth not yet appear what we shall be. We
see but through a glass darkly, nor will any straining of our eyeballs
QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. 531
make clearer that cloudy medium through which alone we ire per-
mitted to gaze. Standing with that wonderful future before us,
on which our eye cannot but often and eagerly be fixed, there is
happily for us another and a better occupation than that of filling
Hie void spaces with forms and colors of our own creation. Children
A that coming resurrection we all must be. No mountain shall have
breadth enough to cover us, no ocean depth enough to hide lis,
when once the imperial summons soundeth, "Arise, ye dead, and
come to judgment." But children of a blessed resurrection, of the
resurrection unto life, we can only be by becoming now the children
of God. Let that be our present, our steadfast aim; let that goal
be reached, and then let us rest quietly in the assurance that, raised
with Christ, we shall be sharers of his immortality, shall die no
more, but be as the angels which are in heaven.
The error of the Sadducees as to the power of God having been
exposed, Christ proceeds to notice their error as to the Scriptures:
"As touching the dead that they rise; have ye not read in the
book of Moses?" Mark 12:26. Among the Jews, down till near
the times of Christ, the first five books of our Bible formed but
one book, written continuously on one roll of parchment. It k
out of this book, called ordinarily the Book of the Law, that he
quotes a sentence in proof of the resurrection. He might have
cited other ampler and much clearer testimony from other parts
of the sacred Scriptures, especially from the Psalms and the books
of Job, Daniel, and Hosea; but he is dealing now with the Saddu-
cees, and he takes the passage from the same writings to which they
had themselves appealed. "Have ye not read in the book of Moses,
how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of
Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is
not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do
greatly err." Mark 12 : 26, 27. The link that binds here the premise
to the conclusion is anything but apparent at first sight. The infer-
ence seems neither natural nor necessary. Does God's calling him-
self the God of the departed patriarchs of itself prove that these
patriarchs were still living? Is not this the simple and only mean-
ing of the passage quoted: that he who had been the God of the
fathers would be the God of the children? Even granting that the
continued existence of those, of whom God spake as being still their
God, was to be legitimately inferred from the expression cited, what
proof was involved in that of their resurrection? Might the soul
not live though the body were left for ever in the grave? In
answer to such questions, let it be noted that Christ's reply to the
530 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
it was in itself a change too great to allow of any ideas borrowed
from the present condition of things being transferred to that new
state of which it must form the initial stage. But Jesus goes a step
farther than this: he puts his hand forward partially to lift the veil,
and tell somewhat of the nature and the extent to which these
changes will be carried which the resurrection will involve. "And
Jesus, answering, said unto them, The children of this world marry,
and are given in marriage : but they which shall be accounted worthy
to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither
marry, nor are given in marriage: neither can they die any more:
for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God,
being the children of the resurrection." Luke 20 : 34-36. This
much is told us here; that great changes are in store for us; that
out of the grave a new economy is to arise, elevated in all its condi-
tions and relationships above that under which we now dwell. But
how much also remains untold; how much to check that prurient-
curiosity with which we are tempted to pry into the future, and extort
from it its secrets !
We have got in the Bible two brief sketches which none but the
finger of God could have drawn, a sketch of the beginning and a
sketch of the end of the world as it now is. The one, the picture
of the past, the story of the creation, how very difficult has it been
for us to decipher it; how slowly are we spelling out its meaning;
how much of it still remains obscure; how utterly should we have
failed in interpreting it aright, had it not so happened that, in these
later years, we have got access to other records, also somewhat
dim as yet, which the events as they occurred stamped enduringly
upon the solid rocks. Now if the scriptural picture of the past
was so dark and so difficult to understand, was in our hands so
long misunderstood and misinterpreted, how can we expect it to be
otherwise with the scriptural picture of the future, which tells of a
coming epoch more unlike the present than is the present to any
epoch of the past? How wise then and becoming for us, till the
events occur that shall yield the true interpretation, to confine our-
selves to the simple and general truths that lie upon the face of
those figurative descriptions of the future state which abound in
the Bible, and which ought never to be treated as literally and
historically true. How vain to use what were meant only to be
obscure hints, as stepping-stones from which fancy may safely mount
and soar away at random. Let us be satisfied with the little that
we can now know. It doth not yet appear what we shall be. We
see but through a glass darkly, nor will any straining of our eyeballs
QUESTION OF THE SADDUCEES. 53J
make clearer that cloudy medium through which alone we ire per-
mitted to gaze. Standing with that wonderful future before us,
on which our eye cannot but often and eagerly be fixed, there is
happily for us another and a better occupation than that of filling
the void spaces with forms and colors of our own creation. Children
jf that coming resurrection we all must be. No mountain shall have
breadth enough to cover us, no ocean depth enough to hide us,
when once the imperial summons soundeth, "Arise, ye dead, and
come to judgment." But children of a blessed resurrection, of the
resurrection unto life, we can only be by becoming now the children
of God. Let that be our present, our steadfast aim; let that goal
be reached, and then let us rest quietly in the assurance that, raised
with Christ, we shall be sharers of his immortality, shall die no
more, but be as the angels which are in heaven.
The error of the Sadducees as to the power of God having been
exposed, Christ proceeds to notice their error as to the Scriptures:
"As touching the dead that they rise; have ye not read in the
book of Moses?" Mark 12:26. Among the Jews, down till near
the times of Christ, the first five books of our Bible formed but
one book, written continuously on one roll of parchment. It k
out of this book, called ordinarily the Book of the Law, that he
quotes a sentence in proof of the resurrection. He might have
cited other ampler and much clearer testimony from other parts
of the sacred Scriptures, especially from the Psalms and the books
of Job, Daniel, and Hosea; but he is dealing now with the Saddu-
cees, and he takes the passage from the same writings to which they
had themselves appealed. "Have ye not read in the book of Moses,
how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of
Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is
not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do
greatly err." Mark 12 : 26, 27. The link that binds here the premise
to the conclusion is anything but apparent at first sight. The infer-
ence seems neither natural nor necessary. Does God's calling him-
self the God of the departed patriarchs of itself prove that these
patriarchs were still living? Is not this the simple and only mean-
ing of the passage quoted: that he who had been the God of the
fathers would be the God of the children? Even granting that the
continued existence of those, of whom God spake as being still their
God, was to be legitimately inferred from the expression cited, what
proof was involved in that of their resurrection? Might the soul
not live though the body were left for ever in the grave? In
answer to such questions, let it be noted that Christ's reply to the
534 THE LIFE OP CHRIST.
VI.
The Lawyer's Question — The Two Great Command-
ments — Christ is David's Son and David's Lord.
TUESDAY.
Pharisees, Herodians, Sadducees have each in turn been foiled
in their assaults. Jesus has either turned aside the edge of their
insidious questions, or has given such reply as recoils upon the
questioners. Among the auditors who are standing by while this
questioning is going on, there is one, himself a Pharisee and a
scribe, who, struck with admiration at our Lord's answer, ventures
an inquiry of his own. In making it he does not appear to have
been animated by any sinister or malignant motive. He may, as
St. Matthew seems to intimate, have been incited by others to put
his question, in the hope that it might puzzle or perplex, but the
question itself has no such character, reveals no such intent ; bear-
ing as it does all the marks of being the ingenuous inquiry of one
who, disturbed and dissatisfied with the manifold classifications and
frivolous distinctions introduced by the ordinary teachers of the law
sought the judgment of Jesus in addressing to him the question,
"Master, which is the great, the first of all the commandments?"
' Is there any one commandment which is entitled to pre-eminence
over all the rest ? if there be, what is that one command, and upon
what ground does its claim to supremacy repose ?' Christ's answer
is direct and explicit. There is, he tells the questioner, such a
command. To love the Lord our God with all our heart and soul,
and mind and strength, is the first and the great commandment
of the law. But there is another, a second commandment, like
unto the first, flowing out of it, and founded on it: "Thou shalt
iove thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang
ail the law and the prophets."
The law of God, according to the view thus given of it, wad
aot an aggregation of so many separate precepts, some of which
a man might keep, while he broke others ; suggesting of course the
double question whether he broke more than he kept, as if that
were to decide whether on the whole he was a breaker or a keeper
of the law; or, were that held to be too rude and mechanical a
method of judging, suggesting a comparison in point of importance
• Matt. 22 : 3^46 ; Mark 12 : 28-37.
THE LAWYER'S QUESTION. 535
between those commands that were kept and tho*(~ that were
broken, so as to supply a better estimate of the amount and value
of the obedience rendered. In opposition to all such views of the
law of God — views not confined to the scribes and Pharisees of
Christ's day, which he at the bottom of all those crude notions
as to man's actual standing towards the divine law which circulate
widely in the world we live in, Jesus teaches that a divine unity
pervades that law, a unity that cannot be broken; all its single
and separate commands resting upon a common, firm, immutable
basis; all so connected in meaning, spirit, and obligation, that you
cannot truly obey one without obeying all, nor braak one without
breaking all. Looking at the law in this oneness of character,
Jesus points to the two requirements of love to God and love to
one another as containing within themselves the sum and substance
of the whole. First we are called upon to love the Lord, to love
him as our God, to love him with all our heart. It is not a mere
barren faith in his divinity, a cold and distant homage, a bare
acknowledgment of his sovereign right, a studious observance of
prescribed forms of worship, the presenting of offerings, the making
of sacrifices in his name and for his glory, that is required. Nothing
but the supreme love of the heart, pouring out the whole wealth
of its affections on him, can meet this great demand. There must
be no other God before or beside him, no other having an equal
or rival place in our regards. All idolatrous self-love, creature-love,
world-love, must be renounced in order that this first and greatest
of the commands be kept. "And thou shalt love thy neighboi
as thyself." 'Thyself thou mayest and shouldest love, but not
supremely, not as distinct from or independent of God, but as one
of his children, as an agent in his hands, as an instrument of his
grace?, as a vessel fashioned for his honor. Thus and thus only
may self-love rightly form part of thy being, and enter into thy
motives of action. And thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself:'
a mode and measure of loving others which can be truly followed
and obeyed only when love to God has predominated over the
natural self-idolatry; for if a man love himself supremely, he can
love no other as he loves himself. All, however, is reduced to order,
all brought within the limits of a possible achievement, when God
gets his first and rightful place. You cannot love the God of love
as he requires, without loving your neighbor also. The one love
includes the other, sustains and modulates the other. If a man
say he loves God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar, and the truth
is not in him. It is in this way that the second command is like
5HG THE I^IFB OF CHBIST.
anto the first. They are two, and at the same time one. The first
eannot be kept while the second is broken, nor the second be kept
while the first is broken. A false or spurious kind of love to God,
showing itself in all manner of superstitious worship and self-mor-
tification, you may have, coupled with intensely malign emotion
towards others. Nay more, you may not only have them in con-
junction, but the first ministering to the second — for there have
been no greater haters of their fellow-men than those who have
cherished such kind of love to God — but the true, the only genuine
love to God, we cannot have, without its generating kindly and
benevolent affections towards those who, equally with ourselves, are
the objects of the divine regard. And, on the other hand, you may
have a very ardent love to others apart from any deep love to God;
but search its nature and mark its developments, and you will find
that neither as to the objects it aims at, nor as to the boundaries
it observes, does it come up to a faithful obedience to that require-
ment which obliges us to love our neighbor as we love ourselves.
" On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."
Love is the golden link that binds the whole together, and hangs the
whole upon the throne of the Eternal. Love is the fulfilling of the
law. No precept is or can be kept where it is wanting. If love be
present, obedience is at once rendered easy, and gets the character
that makes it pleasing in the sight of God.
The scribe's reply to our Lord's answer shows how thoroughly he
sympathized with it. He had admired the wisdom shown in Christ's
dealing with other questioners. He admires still more the wisdom
shown in the answer to his own question. It accords entirely with
what, after much thought bestowed upon the matter, he had himself
come to believe. "Well, Master, thou hast said the truth; for there
is one God, and there is none other but he ; and to love him with aU
the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the soul, and
with all the strength, and to love his neighbor as himself, is more than
;.ul whole burnt-offerings and sacrifices." The alacrity, the warmth,
the vigor of this response, tell how intense the conviction was of which
it was the utterance. Born and brought up though he had been in
the very heart of a region where other and very different sentiments
prevailed, he had come to see the comparative worthlessness of mere
ceremonialism; that offerings and sacrifices were worse than idle
forms, mere solemn mockeries of God, if that inner sentiment of the
heart, whence only they could have life and value, were wanting; that
the only true and animating principle of all piety towards God, and
of all right conduct towards our fellow-men, was love; that as the
THE LAWYER'S QUESTION. &U r i
body without tlie spirit is dead, so all the mass of outward service
without love was dead also. In our turn we wonder at the clear and
just conception of the relative importance of the moral and the cere-
monial, to which, placed as he had been, this man had reached. But
far as he had got, he yet lacked one thing. He had ceased to put
that value upon burnt-offerings and sacrifices that the mass of his
countrymen did. His searching eye had seen through the hollowness
of that external sanctimoniousness which was cultivated all around
him with such sedulous care. But he had not yet come to see all
that the first and greatest of the law's commands required, nor to feel
how far short of its requirement his obedience had fallen. The hol-
lowness of one way of attempting to obey it he fully saw, but the
imperfections of that way which he had learned to put in its place,
Its impotence to justify the sinner before the tribunal of the Most
High, he had not perceived. He wanted the humble, broken, con-
trite heart; and so Jesus says to him, "Thou art not far from the
kingdom of God ;" not far from, but yet not in ; nearer by many a
step than those who are going about in the rounds of a punctilious
pietism to establish a righteousness of their own before God, but still
not across the border-line which encompasses that kingdom which
we must enter in the spirit of penitence and faith, as knowing and
feeling that by the deeds of the law, how far soever our compliance
with it be carried, no flesh living can be justified in the sight of God,
Let the judgment passed upon this man's position by the unerring
Judge proclaim to us the truth, that it is not enough to have made
the discovery of the worthlessness of all service without love ; that to
get into the kingdom the further discovery must be made, that in all
things, and especially in that very love to God which primarily and
above all is required of us, we come so miserably short, have so
grievously offended, that our only resource is to throw ourselves upon
the rich mercy of our God revealed in Jesus Christ.
And was it not for the very purpose of turning the eyes of that
scribe, the eyes of those who then stood around him, and the eyes of
the men of all ages upon Himself, as the great revealer of the Father,
that Jesus, having put all to silence, so that no man durst ask him
any further question, in his turn becomes a questioner? The law and
the prophets, whose sum and substance, so far as they were a code
of duty, he had just declared, had something more in them than
authoritative commands, were meant to accomplish other purposes
besides that of making known to men their duty to God and to one
another. There were promises and prophecies in them as well as
precepts; prophecies and promises pointing to him by whom the law
538 T.HE LIFE OF CHRIST.
was to be magnified and made honorable. The law carried the gos-
pel in its bosom. As to the one, the scribe put a question to Jesus
which goes to the very heart of the matter: as to the other, Jesus,
seeing the Pharisees gathered around him, puts a question to them
which does the same. "What think ye," he says, "of Christ? whose
son is he?" The answer springs at once to every lip.
"Son of David" was the familiar, the favorite title, by which
Christ, the expected Messiah, was known among them. When,
amazed by his miracles, the people began to conjecture that he was
indeed the Christ, they said to one another, " Is not this the son of
David?" When the woman of Syrophoenicia, and the two blind beg-
gars of Capernaum, Bartimeus of Jericho, and others, would express
their faith in his Messiahship, they did it by saying, " Have mercy
on us, thou son of David." When the multitude, translated for the
time out of incredulity into belief, surrounded him on his late tri-
umphal entry into Jerusalem, they exclaimed, " Hosanna to the son
of David !" a salutation that the very children in the temple next
day repeated — showing us how wide and general was the knowledge
of this name. The answer then to Christ's first question is immedi-
ate and unhesitating. Not so the answer to the second : " He saith
unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,
The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I mak?
thine enemies thy footstool ? If David then call him Lord, how is
he his son?" Jesus quotes here the first verse of the 110th Psalm, a
psalm assumed by him and acknowledged by the Jews to have been
written by David under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Two
great personages appear in it, the one speaking of and to the other.
It is with the high position, the complex character, the glorious des-
tinies of the latter that the psalm is occupied throughout. Addressed
by the highest of all epithets, he is introduced as sitting on the lofti-
est of all elevations. His kingly power, his eternal priesthood, his
vast and ever-widening sway, are successively sot forth. The Jews
admitted that these were prophecies touching the Messiah. But
between them and any right apprehension of the true character 01
the spiritual rule and empire of that Messiah there hung an obscuring
mist. The bright and gorgeous vision that had floated for ages
before the eyes of the Jewish people was that of the future advent
of a King who was to raise the Jewish commonwealth to supremacy
fever the nations; the vision of an earthly, visible, world- wide mon-
archy to be set up by the son of David; a vision which, as their
affairs grew dark and desperate, and their national independence was
more and more threatened, stood forth in brighter and brighter col-
DAVID'S SON AND DAVID'S LORD. 539
oring to gild the clouds that closed in darkness above their heads; a
vision clung to with an enthusiastic devotion which ennobled them
as a nation, and led on to the deeds of chivalrous heroism, which
have crowned with glory their last wars with the Romans, but which
sunk them into spiritual blindness, and kept them from understand-
ing the very prophecies upon which it ostensibly was founded. It
was this vision, baseless as it was bright, which Jesus seeks to dissi-
pate by putting to them his pointed inquiry : ' If Christ be David's
son, how could he at the same time be David's Lord ?' The true key
to that announcement in the 110th Psalm, and to many similar proph-
ecies, was wanting to the Jews so long as the true and proper divin-
ity, as well as the true and proper humanity, of their Messiah re-
mained unperceived and unacknowledged.
How often and how strikingly does Holy Writ set forth the dou-
ble, and as it might seem incongruous relationship of Christ to David,
as being at once his son and his Sovereign, his successor and yet his
Lord — set forth the singular, and as it might seem incompatible qual-
ities or characteristics that belong to him ! " And there shall come
forth," saith the prophet Isaiah, "a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and
a Branch shall grow out of his roots." Isa. 11 : 1. He is the rod,
the branch growing up out of, hanging upon, and supported by the
parent stem. But anon the image changes, and the rod, the branch
becomes the root by which the stem itself is supplied with nourish-
ment and strength: "And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse,
which shall stand for an ensign of the people ; to it shall the Gentiles
ssek: and his rest shall be glorious." Isa. 11:10 "Behold," saith
Jeremiah, "the days come, saith the Lord, that I will raise unto
David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and
shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. In his days Judah
shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely ; and this is his name
whereby he shall be called, The Lord our Righteousness." Jer.
23 : b t o- Here, by an equal violence of figurative language, the
helpless dependent branch turns into a king, and that king is eleva-
ted, not to an earthly, but to the heavenly throne. Similarly in Zech-
ariah: "Thus speaketh the Lord of hosts, saying, Behold the man
whose name is The Branch; and he shall grow up out of his place,
and he shall build the temple of the Lord: even he shall build the
temple of the Lord; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and
rule upon his throne; and he shall be a priest upon his throne: and
the counsel of peace shall be between them both." Zech. 6: 12, 13.
Here, by a curious metamorphosis, the Branch first becomes the
builder of a temple, then a ruler upon a throne, then a priest and
540 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
king together, still upon the throne, establishing in that twofold
capacity, or by the help of the twofold prerogatives of prince and priest,
the counsel or covenant of peace for Israel. So is it in the ancient
prophecies, and so is it also in the visions of the Apocalypse. What
is the first vision that John gets of Jesus in the heavenly places? A
door is opened in heaven, a throne is seen set there; the right hand
of him who sits upon the throne holds out the book sealed with the
seven seals. The strong angel proclaims with a loud voice, "Who
is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof? " The
challenge is made, resounds through heaven, remains unanswered.
The apostle begins to weep because no man is found worthy to open
and to read the book. One of the elders says to him, " Weep not;
behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath pre-
vailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof." John
looks around for this opener coming, and lo! in the midst of the
throne there stands a lamb as it had been slain, who takes the book
and opens all its seals. He is told to look for a lion, and beheld a
lamb. The lion and the lamb: the strongest and the fiercest, the
weakest and the gentlest of animals; in Jesus the qualities of both
appear, blended in singular yet most attractive combination. And
in the last revelation of himself he makes to John, Jesus says, " I am
the root and the offspring — the root and the branch — of David, and
the bright and morning star."
" What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? How can he be
David's son and David's Lord? " These last words of our Lord's
public ministry, which filled the temple courts of old, and found
there no reply, are they not still going forth wherever the gospel of
his grace is preached, waiting a response? Nor can any fit response
be ever given till we see and be ready to acknowledge that in him,
our Saviour, there meet and mingle all divine and human attributes —
David's Lord in his divinity, David's son in his humanity; till we own
him, and cleave to him, and hang upon him as at once our elder
brother, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, and our Lord and
our God; the morning star on the brow of our dark night, that heralds
the bright, the cloudless, the unending day.
WOES DENOUNCED DPON THE PHARISEES. 541
VII.
The Woes Denounced upon the Pharisees.*
TUESDAY.
Addressing himself specially to the Pharisees, Jesus asked them
how Christ could be at once David's son and David's Lord ; and they
stood mute before him.
It is of this particular occasion that St. Mark says, "then the
common people heard him gladly." They have been looking on and
listening with intense curiosity — as well they might, for it is truly a
marvellous scene that is before them. Here, on the one side, is one
of themselves, an obscure Galilean, with no rank, or office, or acknowl-
edged authority. There, on the other, stand the first men of the
land, the chief of the priesthood, the heads of the scribes. It had
long been known that the Pharisees repudiated and condemned the
teaching of Christ. More recently their enmity had come to a head.
They had even offered a reward for his apprehension. Now they
meet him face to face in the most public place in all the city. Will
they arrest him? will they order their officers to bind him and carry
him off to prison? No: in presence of the people they will crush
him with their words ; they will convict him of ignorance, or incom-
petence, or sedition. And how shall this untaught, unfriended, un-
protected man be able to stand against such odds ? One can well
enough imagine that when the strange word-duel in the temple courts
commenced, the sympathy of the people would be on Christ's side.
Their sympathy deepens, wonder grows into admiration, as in each
succeeding encounter he comes off more than conqueror, till at last
his opponents stand silenced before him. Still, however, with all the
wonder and all the admiration that Christ excites, other disturbing
and perplexing emotions stir the breasts of the spectators : for those
opponents of Jesus are the men to whom from infancy they have
been taught to look up with unbounded reverence; to whose author-
ity, especially in all matters of religious faith and practice, they have
been accustomed implicitly to bow. The adversaries of Jesus have
been baffled but not convinced; an unquenched, an intensified hatred
to him is obviously burning within their breasts. How is it that none
of their rulers will receive him, that almost to a man they are so bit-
terly opposed to him?
*Matt. 23; Mark 12: 38-40; Luke 20: 45-47.
542 THE LIFE OF CHRIST. .
May we not believe^that in its immediate and direct object, as
addressed to the perplexed and excited crowd that then stood before
and around him, the discourse recorded in the twenty-third chapter
of St. Matthew was intended to take a stumbling-block out of their
way, and by the bold and fearless exposure that it made of the char-
acter and conduct of the Pharisees, to emancipate the people from
that blind thraldom to their old religious leaders in which they had
so long been held? But the discourse had a wider scope. It was
our Lord's last day in the temple, his last time of openly addressing
the people, the closing hour of his public ministry. This interest
surrounds the words then spoken, that it was in them that his last
farewell to the temple, his farewell to his countrymen was taken ;
words not spoken for that audience only, words of solemn warning
for his followers in all ages, for the men of every generation. Re-
garding it in this light, without entering into any minute or consecu-
tive exposition, let us offer one or two general reflections upon this
discourse of our Saviour.
1. It tells us what it was that chiefly kindled against it the burn-
ing indignation of Jesus Christ. Against what are his terrible denuo*
ciations pointed ? Not against either covert skepticism or open infi-
delity. The Sadducees are here comparatively overlooked. Not
against those sins, to which one or other of the passions and instincts
of our nature prompt when allowed unbridled sway. A very singular
and instructive contrast shows itself throughout his ministry between
our Lord's treatment of that class of offences, and of the one which
he here exposes. Compare, for instance, his treatment of the woman
who had been a sinner, and of her to whom he said, "Neither do I
condemn thee, go and sin no more," with his treatment of the
haughty Pharisee at whose table he met the one, and of the double-
hearted men who brought to him the other. It is among those
making the largest professions of piety, priding themselves on
their social position and the outward respectability of their lives,
that Jesus discovers the materials for the severest denunciations
that ever came from his lips. He finds these materials in that kind
and form of religion which, under the guise of great fervor and
zeal for the cause of God, beneath the large and broidered garment
of a showy profession, gets ample room and opportunity for the
indulgence of vanity and pride, the lordly, ambitious, despotic spirit;
in that kind and form of religion that makes so much of the outward,
the institutional, the ceremonial, so little of the moral, the spiritual,
the practical; which exalts the letter above the spirit of the divine
commands; which, finding this old precept of Moses, " Thou shalt
WOES DENOUNCED UPON THE PHARISEES. 543
bind these commandments of the Lord for a sign upon thy hand,
and they shall be as a frontlet between thine eyes," thought that
this command was kept by having strips of parchment with passages
of Scripture on them bound upon the forehead and the arm, and
fancied that the broader the parchment scrips, the more numerous
the passages inscribed, the larger the honor and the service rendered
unto God ; which, finding another old law of Moses, that no unclean
animal should be eaten, strained every sort -of drink carefully through
a linen cloth, lest any gnat or the smallest unclean animalcule might
be drunk ; which, meeting with the ancient Mosaic order that a tithe
of all produce should be offered to the Lord, was not content with
presenting a tithe of the wheat, and the barley, and the oil, the
common staple products of the land, but would give it of the mint,
and the anise, and the cumin, the smallest garden fruits and flowers ;
which invented nice casuistical distinctions among oaths, making out
that some were binding, others not, some were sinful, others not;
which, notwithstanding all its punctilious attention to the niinutias of
certain outward observances, all its laborious cleansing of the out-
side of the cup and the platter, was full within of extortion and
excess— a very strange compound of very heterogeneous elements,
distasteful to all true-hearted men, infinitely distasteful to our Lord
and Master. We might have hoped that, with the departure of that
old ritualism of Judaism, with the coming in of the simpler institute
of Christianity, with the lessons and the life of our Lord himself
before us, the temptation to and the opportunity for such singu-
lar and such offensive development of human nature would depart.
But no ; the spirit of Pharisaism lies deep in that nature ; deepest
where the superstitious and devotional element is strong and the
moral is comparatively weak, not peculiar to certain times and places,
or to be seen only in certain churches under the drapery of ecclesi-
astical ceremonialism kindred to that of the Jews. It is to be found
everywhere, under all forms of religious observance ; where it has
the least natural aliment, making all the more of what it has —
nay more, as if soured by its meagre diet, nowhere will you see a
more odious and repulsive growth of it than in those verjr churches
which have stripped themselves the barest of all forms and cere-
monies.
2. Let us notice the insidiousness and deceitfulness of that spirit
of Pharisaism which in this discourse Christ so fully exposes and so
heavily condemns. The men whom Christ had immediately in his
eye, whose hollowness and falsity he dissects with so unsparing a
hand, had a very different opinion of themselves from that which he
544 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
expresses. Tbey believed themselves to be really tiie most religious
people in their own country — in the world. There may have been a
few of fhem utter and arrant hypocrites, who knew themselves to be
mere pretenders, with whom all the show of devotion was intention-
ally and consciously assumed for selfish and sinister purposes. But
we should err egregiously if we thought that such was the character
of the majority. They imagined themselves to be sincere, and it was
that imagination which was at the bottom of their intense self-satis-
faction, their eager and ostentatious displays. Self-deception went
so far with them that they actually believed themselves to be the
natural successors and representatives of the prophets and righteous
men of the old economy. The memory of their martyred forefathers
was so dear to them, that they built their tombs and garnished their
sepulchres, and said to one another, "If we had lived in those old
times, we should not have been partakers with those who shed their
blood." Yet at this very time they are meditating the death of
Jesus — are about to imbrue their hands in the blood of God's own
Son. Extraordinary instance, you may say, of self-deception. You
would not think so if the eye of Omniscience were for a moment
lent, and it was given to you to discern how many there are present-
ly alive — busy, bustling, pretentious religionists, builders of prophets'
tombs, garnishers of martyrs' sepulchres, the readiest to say, " Had
we lived in the days of those odious Pharisees, we had been no par-
takers of their guilt" ; who, if subjected to the same kind of test with
the Pharisees — these tests altered according to the changes that the
world since then has undergone — would do their deed over again —
in the spirit, if not in the letter, would crucify Christ afresh. Among
all the spirits that have ever entered into and taken possession of
owr nature, there is not one of such self-deceiving power as that of
Pharisaism.
3. You have a striking instance brought before you in this dis-
course of a nation being reckoned with not individually but collec-
tively. The generation in which J^esus lived had sins enough of its
own to answer for. Had there stood against it but that one charge
of having despised, rejected, crucified the Lord, it had been enough
But see how, in the spirit of sublime superiority to all selfish con-
siderations, Jesus makes no mention here of the treatment given to
himself. He looks backward, and lo! all the righteous blood that
had been shed in the land lifts up its cry for vengeance! He looks
backward, and lo! in the hand of the Great Judge the cup of wrath
is seen getting fuller and fuller as the guilt of generation after gene-
ration is poured into it! He looks forward, and lo! the men of the
WOES DENOUNCED UPON THE PHABISEES. 546
generation then existing are beheld pouring the last drops into thai
cop, and by doing so, about to bring down its whole contents upon
their devoted heads! But in the brief prophecy of what remained
still to be done ere the treasured wrath of heaven descended there is
something altogether singular. It is not a bare foretelling of the
future by a commissioned agent of heaven. The prophet here rises
far above the rank of all who had gone before. He speaks as the
prophets' King and Lord. A greater than all the prophets is here.
"Behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes." Matt.
23:34. Christ's feet are upon the pavement of the earthly temple,
but he speaks as from the throne of heaven. Let those who deny
the divinity of Jesus tell us with what propriety any mortal man —
any, even the greatest of the prophets, could have spoken as he here
does. The indirect, the incidental way in which he speaks, deepens
the impression of his divinity. A vision of judgment is to be reveal-
ed. As he reveals it, he almost unconsciously, as we might say,
realizes his own position as the Judge. And assuming that he is so
when he tells us of that generation being made to suffer as well for
others' transgressions as their own, what answ r er shall be given to
those who would challenge the principle and rectitude of this proce-
dure, but this, 'Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right ? ' All
the length that we can here go, is to point to the thousand instances
in God's ordinary providence in which the sins of fathers are visited
upon their children, and to the many instances of human legislation
and international action grounded upon the principle that a nation is
not a set of isolated unconnected units, but a continuous corporate
body, capable of contracting an obligation, and incurring a guilt that
survives the existing generation. We do not say that the exemplifi-
cation of it elsewhere in the arrangement of the divine providence, o*
its embodiment by ourselves when we assume the office of adminis-
trator or judge, carries with it the explanation of such a procedure
as that announced here by Jesus Christ. We do not say that we
have light enough to offer any sufficient vindication of it ; but most
assuredly we have not light enough to repudiate or condemn. Nay
more, we are convinced that when the great mystery of God's deal-
ings with mankind shall stand revealed in their eternal issues, it will
be seen that our separate individual interests, for weal or for woe,
have been wisely and righteously interlapped with the merit and the
guilt of others to a far larger extent than any of us are now prepared
to believe.
4. In this discourse, a phase of the character of Christ, and in
him of God, is set before us, from which we ought not to avert our
Life of Christ. 35
546 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
eye. Christ's voice, as heard on earth, was not always one of gen-
tleness and love. When occasion called for it, it could speak as the
thunder speaks, in volumed terror. Never were severer epithets
employed, never more terrible denunciations uttered, than those
hurled at and heaped upon the heads of the Pharisees. Yet no
mingling here of sinful human passion, of malice or revenge, no
absence even of love. Has Jesus forgotten to be gracious? Are
tenderness and compassion clean gone out of that most loving heart ?
We cannot believe so for a moment. Then let us believe that the
deep, the strong, the burning indignation that breaks out here has a
place and power of its own in the bosom of our Lord, and dwells
together in perfect harmony with the milder and gentler attributes of
his nature. Lightning lurks amid the warm soft drops of the sum-
mer shower ; a consuming fire may come out of the very heart of love.
Christ is the world's great Saviour ; he is also the world's great Judge.
It was as our Saviour he came down to this earth, and gentle and still
indeed was the voice in which that office was discharged. He did
not strive, nor cry, nor cause his voice to be heard in the streets ; but
lest we should misinterpret, and imagine that his spirit was too soft
ever to kindle into wrath, his hand too gentle to do other services
than those of love, once and again, as here, he assumes the office of
the Judge, and speaks with a startling sternness. He began his teach-
ing on the mountain-side of Galilee ; he closed it in the courts of the
temple at Jerusalem. Compare the two discourses, the Sermon on the
Mount, this discourse in the temple : the one begins with blessings, the
other begins and ends with rebuke ; the one pours its benedictions over
the heads of the faithful, the other its maledictions over the heads of
tho faithless; the seven woes of the one confront the seven beatitudes
of the other. Or take for contrast Christ's farewell to his friends, and
his farewell to his enemies : the one composed of words of comfort,
closing in that sublime intercessory prayer which he left behind him
as a type or specimen of his advocacy for us in the heavenly places ;
the other composed throughout of terrible denunciations, types, and
preludes of those awful judgments which in his judicial character he
shall pronounce and execute upon the finally impenitent. And what
does all this teach us but that the religion of Jesus Christ has a two-
fold aspect ? It carries both the blessing and the curse in its bosom.
If here it speaks peace, there it speaks terror ; if to some it has noth»
ing but words of tenderness and encouragement, to others it has
nothing but words of warning and of woe. It stands as the pillar
oloud stood between the Egyptians and the Israelites — with a side o'
glowing brightness and a side of overshadowing gloom. And yet,
THE WIDOW'S MITE. 54*}
let us not fail to notice, that after all it is not in tones of wrath that
the last accents of this farewell of our Lord to his enemies fall upon
our ear. The fire of righteous indignation that burns within him
cannot but go forth. As flash after flash of the lightning it falls
upon the hypocrite and false devotee. But under that fire the inner
leart of Jesus at last dissolves into tenderness. Pity, infinite pity,
pours her quenching tears upon it, and with another look and in
altered tone, a look and tone in which the compassion of the God-
head reveals itself, he exclaims, " O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that
killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how
often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen
gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not !" 'I
would, but ye would not.' The willingness is all with him, the un-
willingness with us. May the very thought of this take our unwilling-
ness away; that at the last our house be not left desolate, that it be
no other than the home that he hath prepared for all who love him.
VIII.
The Widow's Mite — Certain Greeks Desire to see
Jesus.*
TUESDAY.
His terrible denunciation of the scribes and Pharisees having been
delivered, Jesus passes into a court of the temple, the innermost to
which they were admitted, called therefore the Court of the Women.
On one side of this court stood the thirteen large chests, with open-
ings shaped like trumpets, into which the free-will offerings of the
people were thrown. Over against them Jesus seats himself, watch-
ing the passers-by. He sees many rich approach, and throw in, per-
haps ostentatiously, their large contributions, but he does not make
any comment on their gifts. At last, however, a poor woman ap-
proaches the place of deposit. Modestly, timidly, almost furtively,
as if ashamed of being seen, and hiding what she gives, as all too
small for public notice, she casts her farthing in, and is in haste to
depart. See how the eye of the watcher fastens upon this woman.
She is retreating in haste to hide herself in the crowd without ; but
she must not go till other eyes than those of Jesus have also been
turned upon her. " He calls to him his disciples ;" he bids thera
mark her well ; and as their eyes are all upon her, he says to them,
* Mark 12 : 41-44 ; Luke 21 : 1-4 ; John 12 : 20-36.
518 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
" Verily I say unto you, that this poor widow hath cast more in than
they all."
How many were there in Jerusalem, who, if their attention had
been directed to the poor widow's act, and it had been told them that
in giving these two mites she had cast in her all, would have con-.
demned that act ! What was cast into the treasury went either to
the poor or to the priests, to the relief of the indigent or the uphold-
ing of the worship of the temple. But were there many poorer in all
the city than the poor widow herself? Should she not have kept the
little which she had for the relieving of her own wants ? As to the
priests and the temple, a large enough provision was made for them
by public and private charity, without her being asked to add her
trifling contribution. Who could tell, when it came into their hands,
what these well-fed priests would do with her two mites ? And even
if she had a better security that her donation would be well applied,
what need was there to give what was so much to her and what was
so little to them? How many sayings of this kind might her act
have called forth ! and for one that might have praised, probably
there would have been ten who would have condemned. But other
eyes than those of a mere earthly prudence are on her, and another
and very different sentence than one of condemnation is passed
Broad and deep in that poor widow's heart had the love of the God
who was worshipped within that temple been shed. There, by the
post of these gates, she had often waited and worshipped, and there,
in her hours of sorrow, in that worship her burdened spirit had got
relief. She would answer to the call that she knew that the Lord of
that temple had given, to aid in the maintenance of its services. It
was a debt of gratitude that she owed ; it was a privilege to take any
share in such a work. True, it was but the veriest trifle that she
could afford; but it was willingly and gladly given. She would not
have liked that any of those rich people, who were throwing in their
silver and their gold as they went by, had seen her two mites drop
out of her fingers. But there were eyes from which she could not
hide them ; and little as she thought of it, there was one across the
court sitting in judgment upon her, who not only approved her deed,
but elevated her above all the donors of the day. She is not only
the greatest giver of them all, she has cast in more than they all
together — more, not in money value, but in moral worth. And what
else, by giving such world-wide circulation to this her act, and this
his sentence on it, did Jesus mean, than to give a world-wide circu-
lation to the truth, that in his sight, in his Father's sight, it is the
motive which gives its true cnaracter to the act; that greatness in
THE WIDOW'S MITE. 54:9
his estimate of things consists not in the doing of great acts that
every eye must see, and that every tongue may be ready to praise,
but iu doing what may be little things — so small that they shall
escape all human notice, and so insignificant that there may be none
to think them worthy of any praise ; but doing them in a great spirit,
from a great motive, for a great and noble and holy end? He is not
Ihe largest giver who, out of his abundance, and from many mixed
motives, gives to this charity or to that, but he who, impelled by the
pure love of God, and the desire to help on a good object, gives in
largest relative proportion out of the surplus that remains to him
after his own and his family's wants have been provided for.
We do not know the circumstances otherwise of this poor widow.
Let us assume that these two mites were all she had after her per-
sonal wants had been satisfied. Let us assume that, slender as her
income may have been, yet, like all the poor in the land of Israel, she
had some such slender income upon which she could count. We
cannot believe that if by casting these two mites in the treasury she
actually made herself a pauper, with nothing thereafter but the cas-
ual and uncertain charity of others to depend on, that our Lord
would have approved of the act. Assuming then that it was her all,
in the sense of being her all that was left after the provision of her
)wn immediate wants, that she bestowed upon the temple treasury ;
assuming also that all those rich people who went before and who
followed her, in the first instance appropriated of their incomes what
was needful to maintain them in the different grades of society in
which they respectively were placed; let us ask ourselves, if the scale
of giving on which she acted had been universally adopted, what
would the revenue of that temple have been ? We imagine that the
woman had no family; we imagine that she had none naturally claim-
ing a provision at her hands ; we imagine that that treasury of the
temple was the one great channel through which her charity flowed.
It would be wrong indeed in such a state of things as that in the
midst of which our lot is cast, to turn her act into a precedent, for
any one object of Christian or common charity to claim the entire
surplus that any one, rich or poor, among us may possess. But
surely, all due limitations and exceptions made, there is something in
the example thus held out which it becomes us to imitate; and we
shall miss at least one great lesson which it gives if we fail to per-
sei ve how right a thing it is that this burden of giving should be
equally and proportionally borne; knowing that our gifts are all
accepted, not according to what a man hath not, but according to
what every man has. The lesson which, above all others, and in all
560 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
departments of benevolent effort, we most need to have impressed on
us, is the duty of sharing honorably and equally every burden that
Christianity imposes.
The time and circumstances under which the approving verdict
was passed upon the widow's offering enhance its interest. Woe
after woe, in tones of terrible impressiveness, have pealed like vol-
leyed thunder over the heads of his adversaries, and are still echoing
in the courts of the temple. As if to show how quickly and fully the
strong emotions of righteous indignation have passed out of his
breast, he sits quietly down in the attitude of an unoccupied obser-
ver, all trace of anger gone from his countenance, all tones of anger
from his voice, and asks his disciples to notice the poor widow's act.
But there was another and still more interesting exhibition of the
state of our Lord's thoughts and feelings as he took his farewell of
the temple. It is the high prerogative of genius to be able vividly to
realize and represent the thoughts, and sentiments, and words appro-
priate to all kinds of characters, in all varieties of positions. Who
that has read the pages of our great English dramatist has not
remarked how true to nature each representation is, whether it be
monarch on the throne or clown in the closet, statesman, warrior,
prelate, or peasant that appears, and speaks, and acts ? It is by the
exercise of this great faculty that the personages and events of the
past are reproduced and set forth before our eye. There is one
Being, however, who appeared upon the stage of time, who stands
beyond the reach of this faculty ; for, be his genius what it may, who
shall put himself in the place, or think the thoughts, or enter into
the emotions of the Son of God as he passed through his earthly
sojourn ? And yet how natural the desire to know the thoughts awa-
kened in his mind, the emotions kindled in his heart, by the incidents
through which he passed, the individuals with whom he was thrown
into contact ? Here, however, imagination is at fault. Conscious of
its incapacity, it reverently withdraws from the attempt either to con-
ceive or to express how Jesus was affected by the varying events of
his earthly pilgrimage. We cannot, dare not go here beyond what is
revealed. And that is but little. No reader of the gospels can fail
to have noticed how seldom it is that Christ gives us any glimpse of
what was passing in the interior of his own spirit. With all the
greater interest do we ponder over the few occasions in which the
mantle that was ordinarily so closely drawn round its inner shrine ifl
partially uplifted. Such is the interest which attaches to that pas-
sage of his life which now comes under our review.
As Jesus is sitting over against the treasury, Andrew and Philip
^
CEKTAIN GKEEKS DESIKE TO SEE JESUS. 651
come and tell him that in the outer court of the Gentiles certain
Greeks are standing, who have expressed a strong desire to see him.
Bom and brought up as heathen men, they had been so far con-
vinced of the superiority of the Jewish faith, that they were in the
habit of coming up to Jerusalem to worship there the one living and
true God. Whether they had seen or heard much or anything of
Jesus before this time, and what it was which inspired them with such
a strong desire to see him now, we do not know. This may have
been their first visit to Jerusalem. Their earliest knowledge of Christ
may have been derived from what they had witnessed within the last
few days. They must have heard of the raising of Lazarus and the
many miracles which had previously been wrought. They must have
seen our Lord's triumphal entry into the city, and noticed how the
whole community had been moved. The cleansing of the temple
must have made a deep impression on their minds. It was the court
of the Gentiles, the very part of the temple appropriated to the use
of that class to which they belonged, which Jesus had sought to
cleanse from its impurities and profanations. Let us imagine that
those devout Greeks had themselves been scandalized by seeing the
place consecrated to worship turned into a common market ground,
by seeing the priesthood more eager to make money than to win
Gentiles to their faith. Here, however, is one man, a Jew, animated
by something like the right spirit, who drives out these buyers and
sellers, wiiose aim and effort is that this place be made what it was
meant to be, a house of prayer for all nations. Who can this Jesus
be ? He calls the temple his own house. He speaks of God as his
own Father. The chief priests and rulers are angry at him; have
even put a price upon his head ; have given orders that if any man
knew where he was, he should tell, in order that he might be taken
and put to death. Yet he walks openly in the midst ; the people
gaze on him with wonder ; the very children hail him with hosannas
as the Son of David. Who, those strangers ask again, can this Jesus
be ? In their curiosity they come to Philip, a Galilean, a native of
Bethsaida, one who knows their language, with whom they may have
had some previous acquaintance, or they come to him because he is
the one nearest them at the time, with whom they can most readily
communicate, and they say to him : " Sir, we would see Jesus." Philip
tells Andrew ; Philip and Andrew, the Greeks in all likelihood follow-
ing them, tell Jesus. He has many around him when this message is
conveyed to him, and the disciples and the Greeks stand waiting tka
result. He gives no direct or immediate answer. He stands a mo-
ment, lost in thought, and then breaks out into expressions, vagae
552 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
and dark enough to those who listened to them at the time, jet full
of the richest meaning, and conveying, too, though neither the Greeks
nor the disciples, nor any of those around, may have seen then how
it was so, one of the best answers to the request which had just been
made.
To understand this, let us remember that Jesus knew from the
beginning what was to be the broad issue of his mission to tnis earth.
The words of the Father, spoken of old by the prophet, were familiar
to his ear : "It is a light thing that thou shouldest be my servant to
restore the preserved of Israel. I will give thee to be a light to the
Gentiles, that thou mayest be my salvation to the ends of the earth :
a light to lighten the Gentiles, as well as the glor}*- of my people
Israel." Knowing this, familiar with this from the beginning as the
end and object of his incarnation, one cannot help believing that the
narrowness of the bounds within which his personal ministry was
confined, and the smallness of the results which, during its continu-
ance, that ministry realized, were often as a heavy burden pressing
upon the Kedeemer's spirit. A.s a son, indeed, he learned obedience;
he willingly submitted to the restraints laid on him; he cheerfully
conformed to the will of Him that sent him, and expended his per-
ional labors upon the lost sheep of the house of Israel — but not with-
out many an inward thought of the joy set before him, of the harvest
yet to be gathered in, of the glory yet to be revealed — thoughts kept
buried in his heart, not at first to be uttered, for who could under-
stand or sympathize? But here, at last, on the very eve of his agony
and death, these Greeks, these Gentiles, come desiring to see him.
He hails them as the representatives of the vast community to which
they belong. In their coming to him he sees the first-fruits of that
rich harvest which the world in all its borders was to yield. The
great future of the gospel times and ages, hidden from all others,
brightens into its full glory before his eye. The time, he knows, is
near — he takes this very message from these Greeks as the token ol
its approach — when the mystery shall be revealed, and the middle
wall of partition between Jew and Gentile shall be broken down, wide
over all the earth the glad tidings of salvation in his name go forth,
and men of all peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kindreds be
gathered into that one fold, of which he is to be the Shepherd. But
between the present and this great result there lay, now very near
at hand, his own sufferings and death — the lifting of him upon that
tross which is to serve as the great means of gathering all men unto
him.
Connecting thus, as was most natural, the petition of the Greeks
CERTAIN GREEKS DESIRE TO SEE JESUS. 553
with the gathering in of the Gentiles, and that gathering in with his
own approaching death, Jesus answered and said : "The hour is come
that the Son of man should be glorified. Yerily, I say unto you,
Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone,
but if it die it bringeth forth much fruit." Take a single kernel of
seed corn : there dwells within it the mysterious principle of life — the
gift of the Creator that no man can bestow. Keep it above the ground,
preserve it carefully from the touch of death and of corruption, it
may abide for years, retaining its own vitality; but it so abides in
solitary unfruitfulness — no life comes out of its life. Bury it, how-
ever, beneath the sod; let it pass down into what becomes to it the
realm of corruption and of death ; let it rot and die there : then from
out that death the new life cometh — fresh, abounding, multiplying
life. So it is, and so only, that it bringeth forth much fruit. And of
the world's great spiritual harvest Jesus is the one seed-corn. He
had the life in himself, and might have kept it for ever there. But to
turn it into the source of life to others he too must obey the law of
life, propagating itself and spreading abroad through death. He too
must die, that by dying he may bring forth much fruit.
The death of the Kedeemer stands by itself; in a manner peculiar
to itself the source of spiritual life to all united to him by faith. And
yet there is a sense, and that a most real and important one, in which
what was true of the head is true also of all the members. They too
must come under the operation of the great principle and law which
brings life out of death. They too must die, as he their Saviour died ;
must take up their cross in turn, and in self-denial and self-sacrifice
bear it ; they must have a fellowship with his sufferings ; be planted
^n the likeness of his death ; be crucified with Christ ; must fill up
what remains of his sufferings for his body the church. "For," said
Jesus, immediately after having spoken of his own death and its
great issues, "he that loveth his life shall lose it, and he that hateth
his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal." "If any man
serve me" — be willing to become like-minded, like-hearted with me,
look to my death as not only the fountainhead of his own spiritual
life, but the model after which the whole temper, frame, and spirit of
his being is to be moulded, then, added Jesus — "let him follow me,
and where I am there shall also my servant be ; if any man serve
me, him will my Father honor." In the quick surrey of the future
that now engages the Saviour's thoughts, he sees beyond his death,
iealizes his position as exalted to the Father's right hand in the
heavenly places — the shame and the dishonor, the buffeting and the
scourging, the agony and the dying, exchanged for the glory he had
f
554 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
with tlie Father before the world was. A kindred elevation and like
honors awaited all who took up their cross daily, and in self-denial
and self-sacrifice bore it ; sufferers with him here, thej would be glo-
rified with hiro hereafter.
Such as I have thus tried to trace it was the current of thought
~„m cing through the first utterances of Jesus, given in answer to the
announcement that certain Greeks stood without desiring to see him*
But now a sudden change comes over the spirit of the Eedeemer.
His eye closes on the crowd around; he ceases to think of, to speak
with man; he is alone with the Father. A dark cloud descends and
wraps him in its folds ; he fears as he enters into this cloud. From
the midst of its thick darkness a trembling agitated voice is heard
telling of a spirit sorely troubled within. Those of you who have
watched by the bed of the dying must often have noticed how as the
great event drew near foreshadowings of it came at measured inter-
vals — a struggle, a faintness, a pallor so like the last that you held
your breath as thinking that the spirit was about to pass. Death
often throws such shadows of itself before, and the greatest of all
deaths, the death of the Son of God, was also thus prefigured. The
agony of the garden, what was it ? It was but the spiritual anguish
of the cross let down beforehand upon the soul of the Eedeemer.
The inward agony that wrung from the lips of the dying Jesus the
bitter cry, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" was the
same in source, in character, in object, with that which forced the
thrice repeated prayer, "Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass
from me." And the closing sentence of Gethsemane, "Not my will, O
God ; thy will be done," is it not a softened echo of the last and loud
triumphant exclamations, "It is finished. Father, into thy hands I
commit my spirit"? Still more striking, however, is the likeness be-
tween what took place visibly, audibly here within the temple, and
what happened two days afterwards in the solitude of the garden.
The correspondence is too close to be overlooked. You have in each
oase the struggle, the prayer, the triumph, following each other in
the same order. "My soul," said Jesus to the three disciples as he
passed into the interior of the garden, "is exceeding sorrowful, even
unto death." "Now," in the hearing of the company within the temple,
he said, "now is my soul troubled." " O my Father, if it be possible,
let this cup pass from me," is the prayer in the one case; "Father,
save me from this hour," the prayer in the other. And the conflict is
hushed, and the troubled spirit sinks to rest in the one case, saying,
" Nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt ;" and in the other, " Bui
for this cause came I unto this hour ; Father, glorify thy name."
CERTAIN GREEKS DESIRE TO SEE JESUS. 555
"Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glori-
fied it, and will glorify it again." Twice before — at the baptism in
the Jordan, and the transfiguration on the mount — the same voice
had been heard. But this third instance has more of publicity, if not
of solemnity, attending it. At the baptism there were few pros
£nt, and we may reasonably doubt whether any but John and Jesus
saw the descending dove, and heard the voice from heaven. At the
transfiguration there were present only the chosen three ; but here,
in the temple, before a listening crowd, in answer to a public and
solemn appeal, this voice gives its crowning accrediting testimony.
This testimony given, the cloud disperses, the divine colloquy be-
tween the Son and the Father ceases. Christ's thoughts return to
earth, to flow once more along the channel into which the applica-
tion of the Greeks had led them. First he turns aside for a moment
to correct the misapprehension of some of the spectators. It had
been here as it was on the occasion of Paul's conversion on his way
to Damascus. Some had heard but a confused noise, and would have
it that it was nothing more than a common peal of thunder that had
sounded above their heads; others had made out that it was a voice,
but not catching the words, or not entering into their meaning, would
have it that it was an angel that in some unknown tongue had been
addressing him. Jesus tells them that it was indeed a voice which
they had heard, and that it had spoken not so much on his account
as on theirs. Then, taking up once more the idea which runs as a
connecting link through the whole of this passage, that the time had
come for the completion of his great work, and the gathering up of
its fruits, his eye glances over the whole realm of heathendom ; he
sees that vast domain given over to the great usurper, the prince of
this world, the spirit of unrighteousness sitting in the high places
and exercising an unhallowed supremacy. The time had come, how-
ever, for a world given over to wickedness to be judged, and for the
usurper, who had so long held dominion over it, to be cast out. But
how, and by what instrument? Not by might nor by power; not by
bolts of vengeance flung at the ungodly; not by the hand of violence
laid upon the usurper, and he dragged off with chains of iron bind-
ing him ; no, but by another power mightier than his, drawing men
away from him, dissolving their allegiance to him, linking them in
love to God. "And I," said Jesus, "if I be lifted up, will draw all
men unto me."
Such, as foreseen and pre-announced by our Lord himself, was to
be the effect of his crucifixion. It was to clothe him with a power
over the spirits of men, unlimited in its range, omnipotent in its h>
550 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
fluence, designed and fitted to exert its benignant sway as widely as
the human family is scattered. From the time that he was lifted up,
by his cross, its triumphs and its attractions, by all that it so willingly
holds out for their acceptance and for their imitation, Jesus has been
bringing all men to him — men of every age, of every country, of
every character, of every condition ; the wise and the simple, the rich
and the poor, the honored and the despised, Jews, Greeks, barba-
rians, Scythians, bond and free. He puts this cross into our hands;
he bids us lift it up, he bids us carry it abroad. Ours the outward
work of letting all men know and see who it was that died for them
on Calvary, and what it was that by dying for them he has done.
His the inward power to work upon the heart, and by that charm
which neither space nor time can ever weaken, to win it to peace, to
love, to holiness, to heaven.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
After the full, strenuous day of controversy in the temple which
closed Christ's public ministry, and after he had borne final witness
to the national authorities, he retires, about sunset of Tuesday, with
his apostles to the Mount of Olives. He may have gazed at the temple
with a certain lingering look of interest as he was about to leave it,
calling forth from some of his company the remark, " Master, see w T hat
manner of stones and what buildings are here." These words draw
from Christ the distinct declaration of the destruction of the build-
ing so that there should not be left " one stone upon another " that
should not be thrown down.
When they are seated on Mt. Olivet, gazing at the temple and
across the city bathed in the sunset rays, four, of the apostles, having
in mind his last words concerning the temple, approach Christ and
ask, " Tell us, when shall these things be? and w T hat shall be the sign
of thy coming and of the end of the world?"
Looking at the reply of Christ as given in the 24th and 25th chapters
of Matthew, it is thought that there are three main ideas: his coming
in the destruction of Jerusalem, with its precedent portents and accom-
panying horrors; then, past a hidden valley or period of history, the
summit of another advent- judgment of the Lord; and probably beyond
a still wider valley or stretch of time, the final coming of Christ at the
end of the world and for the general judgment of mankind. Through
all his statements runs a golden line of words showing Christ's tender
OUTLINE STUDIES. 55Ga
care for and direction of his followers amid the distresses of these
crisis times.
There are two virtues which are especially requisite to the success
of Christ's disciples — watchfulness and diligence; and our Lord pic-
tures the first in the parable of the Ten Virgins, and the second in that
of the Talents.
Our Lord then closes his discourses for this eventful day and evening
with a picture of the general judgment. Passing by the outward or
material setting of this stupendous scene, each reader and student may
fix his thought upon the one essential test designated by the words
of Christ as that which will mark those upon the right hand of the
King. It is feeding the hungry, entertaining the stranger, clothing the
naked, visiting those that are sick or in prison. He who does this
because the spirit of Jesus is implanted in his own soul, and he then
goes forth to minister to all who need, will find in that day that he has
really ministered to Christ in the persons of his needy brethren and sis-
ters. The ministering is not the basis of merit, but rather the spirit
of ministry, and this is created or enkindled by Christ in the souL
Where this exists, there will be the power to see some capacity for
eternal life, some element of nobility, some lineaments of the Lord
in every individual. It is this faith in the salvability of men that
makes their actual salvation possible. Christ himself possessed it;
therefore he could make of wavering Simon the son of Jonas the rock-
like Peter, of the selfish Levi sitting at the receipt of custom the bountiful
apostolic Matthew, of the doubting Thomas the one who could wor-
shipfully cry, " My Lord and my God," of Mary of Magdala, in whom
were seven devils, the rapt saint who was the first to see him after his
resurrection with the joyful word, " Rabboni."
PART IV. PASSION WEEK TO GETHSEMANE.
Study 18. Prophetic Instructions to the Apostles.
(1) From the Temple to Mt. Olivet 5566, 557
a. Christ leaves the temple as a victor ..'.., 5566
b. The apostles call attention to the building 557
c. Jesus announces its coming complete destruction 557
d. They proceed to the western slope of Mt. Olivet 557
(2) Threefold question of the apostles 557, 558
a. " When shall these things be? " 557
b. " What shall be the sign of thy coming? " 557
c. " What shall be the sign of the end of the world? " 557
d. Confusion and difficulty of the three points , 558
(3) Christ's answer to the question 558-570
a. There appear to be three advents of Christ referred to 558, 559
b. Warning, directions, and consolations to his followers 560-564
c. The first coming of Christ is in the destruction of Jerusalem 564
5566 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
d. The second coming of Christ in his kingdom and glory, and the third
at the end of the world, are not clearly distinguished from each
other . . 564-570
(4) The parable of the Ten Virgins 570-578
a. Jewish marriage customs and our Lord's parabolic language 570-573
b. The ten virgins represent professed disciples of Christ 573
c. The foolish virgins represent those whose profession is unreal. . . . 574-578
(5) The parable of the Talents 579-588
a. Can be distinguished from that of the Pounds 579-581
b. But their lessons are much the same 581
c. The ideal of complete service 581-583
d. The reward of service is the privilege of greater service 583-588
(6) Picture of the final general judgment 588-603
a. .Features of the scene described 588-596
b. The elements represent reality 595
c. The character and deeds approved spring from love to and likeness
to Christ 597-603
IX.
The Prophecies of the Mount.*
TUESDAY.
The stormy collision between Christ and the chief priests at
length was over. Jesus, calling the twelve around him, left that
court of the temple in which the conflict had been carried on, not as
one defeated or driven away by his adversaries, but clearly and avow-
edly as the victor. It looks, from the two incidents which followed,
as if Jesus, his public teaching in the temple over, lingered yet a
little while reluctant to take what he knew would be his last sight of
its sacred interior. At last, however, sadly and slowly he departs.
There was perhaps something marked and noticeable in the earnest
looks Jesus was bestowing on the buildings. There had certainly
been much in what they had just seen and heard to excite the atten-
tion of his disciples. Those last words of his address to the Phari-
sees ring heavily in their ears — "Behold, your house is left unto you
desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye
shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord." What
house is to be left so desolate ? Is it this very temple in which they
stand? What kind of desolation is to overtake that house? Is it
Indeed, as some words of their Master, spoken long before this time,
* Matt. 24, 25 ; Mark 13 ; Luke 21 : 5-36.
THE PROPHECIES OF THE MOUNT. 557
might seem to imply, to be destroyed ? A dark foreboding of some
awful catastrophe hanging over that sacred pile is upon their spirits ;
and one of them giving vague expression to the common feeling, and
with some dim hope that something further, clearer, may be told,
said, "Master, see what manner of stones and what buildings are
here!" "See ye not," is our Lord's reply, "all these things? verily 1
say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another,
that shall not be thrown down." Distinct and unambiguous an-
nouncement! One cloud of obscurity at least is rolled away. The
solid, stately, sumptuous fabric on which all their eyes are fastened
is to perish, from its very foundation to be overturned. But though
this fact be thus made certain, how many questions as to the time,
the manner, the causes, the consequences of it, would at once arise to
trouble the disciples' mind. Their Master, however, is already on his
way to the gate which leads out to Bethany, and they follow. Silent
all and thoughtful they follow him ; they descend into the valley of
Jehoshaphat, cross the Kedron, begin the ascent of Olivet, have
reached a height which commands the city, where Jesus pauses and
sits down — as that accurate narrator Mark informs us, "over against
the temple." It must have been near the very spot where, two or
three days before, Jesus had beheld the city and wept over it, and
through his tears had seen that sad vision of Jerusalem beleagured^
and her enemies casting a trench around her, and compassing her
about, and keeping her on every side, and laying her even with tho
ground, and leaving not one stone upon another. As Jesus and his
disciples sat down upon the ridge of Olivet, the eyes of all would rest
upon the sumptuous edifice before them there, across the valley,
glowing now beneath the beams of the setting sun. The quiet spot,
the evening hour, the serene attitude, his words so lately spoken, all
conspire to draw the disciples' thoughts upon the dark and doubtful
future. Gently approaching him, Peter and James and John and
Andrew put to Christ' the question, "Tell us, when shall these things
be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the
world?"
It is of the utmost importance, as throwing light upon the whole
structure and meaning of Christ's answer, that we look into the in-
quiry to which it was a response. Taking up that inquiry with the
information which we now possess, we should say that it referred to
three distinct and separate events : 1. The destruction of the temple;
2. The coming of Christ; 3. The end of the world. But the men
who made that inquiry had no clear idea of these three events being
distinct and separate from each other. They had heard their Master,
558 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
and that very recently, speak of his impending sufferings and death,
and of another coming of the Son of man, when he should be revealed
in his glory. They had heard him say, "Verily I say unto you, There
be some standing here which shall not taste death till they see the
Son of man coming in his kingdom," What a mass of difficulties
was here for these men with their existing beliefs to unravel! Christ's
coming to his kingdom they had always looked forward to as the
issue speedily to be realized, when he should ascend the throne of
Israel and rule upon the earth as earth's acknowledged sovereign.
But somehow, between them and that issue were interposed those
sufferings and that death the object of which they could not compre-
hend. They had always associated Christ's coming to his kingdom
with the elevation of their country to the first place among the na-
tions, and the restoring and purifying of their great sanctuary at Jeru-
salem ; but now Jesus speaks of coming not to restore but to destroy.
He tells them of a time when of all those great buildings of the
temple not one stone should be left upon another. Was that to be at
the time of his coming, and was the time of his coming to be the end
of the world ? Imagining that it must be go, and yet unable to see
how it could be so, incapable of dissociating the three events, yet
unable to harmonize what had been said about each, they come
with all their obscurity and confusion of thought to Jesus, and they
nay to him, "Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be
the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?"
Look now at the reply of Jesus to this question, as given in the
24th and 25th chapters of St. Matthew, and ask yourselves Iioav
far did Jesus go in clearing away the doubts or misapprehensions
which the complex question put to him involved. Did he at once,
clearly and unambiguously, inform his disciples that the destruction
of Jerusalem was at hand? that it would happen within the lifetime
of men then living? Did he, separating between different future
comings of his, some figurative, some personal, tell them that it
was to his first figurative coming he had referred, when he said
that there were some of those men standing before them who should
witness it? Did he proceed to separate by a long interval of many
centuries the coming to judge Jerusalem, from his coming to avenge
his own elect, to gather them from the four winds of heaven, and
set up his kingdom upon the earth? or did he separate again that
personal advent at the beginning of the millennium, from the day
of the world's final judgment, and the passing away of these heavens
and this earth? So far from this, the prophetic discourse of our
Lord is studiously and purposely so framed, that with no other
THE PROPHECIES OF THE MOUNT. 559
guidance than that which itself affords, we still might confound, as
the disciples confounded, the three advents of our Lord. With the
fulfilment of the first part in our hands, as an event long since gone
by, we are able to mark the separating line which divides the first
advent of Christ, that day of judgment of the Lord, from all others
that are to follow. Had we, however, stood where the apostles
did, had we had this great comprehensive draft or sketch of the
future held up to our eyes, as it was to theirs, would it have been
possible to discern even that dividing line? For how is this pro-
phetic picture framed? Behind a foreground filled with signs and
tokens of impending woes, there rises as the first summit of a moun-
tain range the Lord's coming to visit Jerusalem in his anger ; then,
right over that summit, almost on the same level, but dimmer,
appearing to the eye quite close to it — the intervening valley quite
hid from sight. — another summit is beheld, another judgment- advent
of the Lord, a second, and, as many believe, even farther back, yet
a third. What seems, however, especially to perplex the eye as it
rests on this prophetic picture, is not only that events are brought
close together which may be — some of which we now know are —
actually distant from each other by many centuries; not only are
marks and tokens of these intervening spaces wanting here, not
only are all the events of the one class described in the same way,
painted in the same colors, but each is used as typical of those
which come behind, described accordingly in terms which appear
to belong to its successor rather than to itself; and so it is that
many readers have felt it to be impossible to determine of many of
the sayings of the discourse, whether they are to be applied to the
first or second or third advent of Christ.
With these general observations, let us take up the discourse
itself. It will be found that it divides itself into three parts, which
on the whole correspond to the three inquiries which are virtually
involved in the question of the disciples: the first part, from the
beginning of the 24th chapter to its 29th verse, being occupied with
the destruction of Jerusalem; the second, from the 29th verse of the
24th chapter to the 30th verse of the 25th chapter, being occupied
with the Lord's advent to establish and set up his kingdom upon
the earth; and the third, from the 31st verse to the end of the 25th
chapter, occupied with the final judgment and the end of the world,
I shall have a word or two to say hereafter as to whether we should
distinguish the second of these sections in any way from the third;
whether there shall be any other future coming of Christ besides thu
one when he shall come to close the present order of things Mean-
560 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
while let us turn our thoughts to that portion, the easiest certainty
to be understood, which sets forth the coming siege and ruin of the
holy city. When shall these things be? when shall Jerusalem be
destroyed? Jesus does not satisfy the curiosity that had respect
alone to the date of the event, which would like to know how many
years it would be till the ruin of their ancient city was accomplished:
but he gives them, not one, but many signals of its approach. False
Christs were to arise, there were to be wars and rumors of wars,
and earthquakes in divers places, and famine and pestilence, and
persecution of themselves. These, however, were to be but the
beginning of sorrows ; they were to regard them as so many tokens
that the end was drawing on. The ten verses from the 4th to the
14th are occupied with the detail of these. All who have access
to the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus, can easily satisfy
themselves how fully and accurately all these tokens were verified
during the years which lay between the ascension of Christ and
the destruction of Jerusalem.
Without referring to historic details, let me rather ask you to
notice how Christ subordinates the prophetic intimations which he
makes to the instructions, warnings, consolations with which he
accompanies them. Does he speak of false Christs appearing ? he
prefaces that prophecy by saying, " Take heed that no man deceive
you." Does he speak of coming wars and rumors of wars? he adds,
"See that ye be not troubled" Does he detail the sufferings to
which his own followers during that interval are to be exposed?
he follows it up by the assurance that he who shall endure to the
end shall be saved. It was not so much to prove his prophetic
power, not so much to gratify their desire that some pre-intimation
of the approaching event should be given them, as to forewarn
and forearm them against the spiritual dangers to which they were
exposed, that Jesus entered on these details.
Even here, however, in the first section — whose reference to the
proximate event of the destruction of Jerusalem no one can doubt —
we have instances of that double sense of the Lord's sayings, theii
applying to the incident more immediately alluded to, yet carrying
along with them an ulterior reference to the future and kindred one
with which in the broad delineation it is conjoined. "He that
endureth to the end shall be saved :" the primary signification here
is, fhat he who, through all these seductive influences of false proph
ets, through all these wars and rumors of wars, through all those
fiery trials of persecution, should hold fast his fidelity, would .be
delivered from that destruction which was to descend upon Jerusa-
THE PROPHECIES OF THE MOUNT. 561
iem; the secondary signification, one which extends to every period
of the Church, and to every one who abideth faithful unto death,
holds out in promise, the greater, the spiritual, the everlasting salva-
tion. Again, the gospel of the kingdom shall be preached for a
witness unto all nations. In their primary sense these words
received their first fulfilment anterior to the destruction of Jeru-
salem. "Their sound," says Paul, speaking of the first missionaries
of the cross, "went unto all the earth, their words unto the ends
of the world." In another epistle, he speaks of the gospel which
the Colossians had heard, as preached to every creature which is
under heaven. But in a wider and more strictly literal sense, before
the final advent which the first symbolizes, there was to be a
diffusion over all the earth of the knowledge of Christ — the two
signs here given of Christ's coming to destroy Jerusalem, a general
apostasy, the love of many waxing cold, and a widespread dissem-
ination of the truth, being, as we know from the other parts of the
discourse, the very signs by which the second advent of our Lord
is to be preceded.
But Jesus not only mentions certain signals by whose appearance
they might be admonished that the great catastrophe was drawing
on, he gives a token by which they might know when it was at the
very door. He does this in order to dictate the course which they
should then take in order to provide for their safety. "When ye
shall see the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel the
prophet standing where it ought not, in the holy place," etc. In
St. Luke's gospel it stands, " When ye shall see Jerusalem com-
passed with armies." When the two came into conjunction — the
outward sign of the city being compassed about with armies — the
inward one of some flagrant desecration of the holy place within
the temple being perpetrated — they were to betake themselves to
instant flight. And so great was the expedition they were to use,
that he who was on the house-top was not to wait to come dows,
by the inner stair to take anything out of the house, but, escaping
even as he was, was to descend at once by the outer flight of stairs,
which, in Jewish houses, led from the house-top to the street, and
fly as for his life. We cannot now say decisively what the abomi-
nation of desolation was ; doubtless it was recognized by those for
whose benefit Christ's words were spoken. We know, however, that
two years before the city was invested by Yespasian, a Koman army,
under Cestius Gallus, approached and invested it. It strangely
enough happened that as Titus surprised the city at the time of the
passover, Cestius surprised it during the feast of tabernacles, when all
Ue, not forming part of the talent or talents committed to his trust,
but rather forming the ground and measure upon which, and in
proportion to which, these are bestowed. As this master has three
servants to whom, according to their original ability, he intrusts a
larger portion of his goods than he would commit to ordinary ser-
vants, so the great Master of the spiritual household has those to
whom, in the wider spheres of opportunity and of influence opened
up to them, in the richer spiritual gifts and graces bestowed, qualify-
ing them to fill those spheres, he assigns a higher function, as he
looks for a corresponding and commensurate return.
Such seem to be legitimate enough conclusions from the different
audiences to which the two parables were addressed, the different
ends they were designed to gain, the different structure of their
opening sections. Of far greater importance, however, than the
tracing of any such nice distinctions — in which it is quite possible
that we may go too far, is it to fix our thoughts upon that common,
general, universal lesson embodied in both these parables. All of
us who have made the Christian profession acknowledge ourselves
as servants of an absent Lord. He has temporarily withdrawn from
us his visible presence, but he has not left us with the bonds of
our servitude lightened or relaxed. So far from this, do not these
parables very clearly and significantly point to something peculiar
in the interval between his withdrawal and return, marking it off
as one of special probation? Let us remember that it is from the
relationship which of old existed between a master and his slaves
that the imagery of these parables is taken. A slave in those days
might not only be called to do the ordinary work, household or out-
of-doors, which fell to the lot of an ordinary domestic : but if he had
the talent for it, or were trustworthy, his master might allow him
to engage in trade, or to practise in any profession, the master
receiving the profits, the slave reaping the benefit of better position
and better maintenance. Were such a master, on going away for
a considerable period from his home and country, to give three of
his slaves who were thus employed, full and unchecked liberty in
his absence to follow the bent of their own taste and talent, instead
of prescribing for each of them a certain kind and amount of work
which, under the eye of his overseer, day by day, and week by
week, they were to perform, we would speak of this as liberal treat-
ment, as a mark on his part of trust and confidence. But if, still
further, such a master on the eve of his departure, were to summon
his slaves into his presence, and supply them with a larger or a
smaller capita" to operate on, which capital they were left at perfect
582 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
freedom to employ each as he pleased, provided only that he era-
ployed it always as his master's capital, and kept the returns as his
master's profits, whether such a procedure on the master's part be
assigned to a selfish or to a generous motive, most certainly would
place the servant in a new and peculiarly responsible position —
put him upon a special probation. Such is the position which all
true servants of the Saviour occupy; and such the probation to
which they are now exposed. Our Master is not here personally
to assign to us our different places and our different work; he is not
here directly to inspect, and day by day, at each day's close, to
call us into his presence and make the reckoning with us. He has
retired from the platform of this visible creation; but not the less,
rather indeed the more, are we under obligation to work for and
to work under him; for has he not treated us with a generous
liberality? has he not left us so to deal with that portion of his
goods he has put into our hands as to each of us seemeth wisest
and best? has he not left us to cultivate each the special talent he
has bestowed? and broad and varied as the field of human effort,
so broad and varied has he not made that field, in cultivating which
we may still be serving him ? has he not even warned us — however
different our ways of life — against judging one another, saying to
us, "Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own
master he standeth or falleth"? And has he not generously dealt
out to us of his goods, leaving none of us, no, not the youngest, the
weakest, the poorest, the least gifted, bankrupt of the means to
serve him, without the single pound? The one, the two, the five
talents, have they not been lavishly conferred? And we have
accepted all as put into our hands by him, as still his ; as ours only
to be used for him as he desires. That, and no less, lies involved in
our very profession as Christians.
" The Lord Jesus Christ, whose I am and whom I serve," one ol
the best and briefest descriptions of discipleship ; yet how much does
it include ! All the greatest religious ideas and beliefs are simple ;
the difficulty lying not in the intellectual conception, but in the prac-
tical realization of them. Is it not so with the idea that we are ser-
vants — stewards, having nothing that we can absolutely call our own ;
nothing that we are left at liberty to dispose of irrespective of the
will of the Sovereign Proprietor in the heavens. Easy enough m
thought to embrace this idea; easy enough in words to embody it;
not difficult to get an acknowledgment of it from every one who has
any faith in God or Christ ; it is so natural, so necessary a conclusion
from the position in which we and our Creator, we and our Redeemer,
THE PARABLE OF THE TALENTS. 583
stand to one another. But truly, habitually, practically to carry the
idea out ; to regard our time, our wealth, our faculties, our influence,
as all given us to be spent and exercised under the abiding, control-
ling conviction that they are ours but in loan, held by us but in trust,
another's property assigned to us to be administered agreeably to his
will and for his good and glory; let us all be ready at once to say
hew difficult we have felt it to frame our doings upon this principle ;
to live and act as the servants of that Master to whom, ere very long,
we shall have to give in the strict account as to how every portion of
that capital which he advanced was employed. The sense of account-
ability is universally felt — is so wrought into the tissue of our moral
nature that you cannot extract it thence without the destruction of
our moral being. Yet, alas ! more or less with all of us, is it not as
the voice of one crying in vain in the market-place, a voice pleading
for the divine ownership over us, to which we render, when we pause
to listen to it, the homage of respectful consent, but which is* drowned
and lost amid the other nearer, louder, more vehement voices which
salute our ear.
But let us turn now to the reckoning and the reward. In the par-
able of the pounds — on the nobleman's return, he calls for those ser-
vants to whom he had given the money, to see how much each had
gained by trading. The first servant approaches, and says, " Lord,
thy pound hath gained ten pounds. And he said, Well done, thou
good servant; thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou
authority over ten cities." A second servant says, " Lord, thy pound
hath gained five pounds." He repeats the same words to him : " Well
done, thou good servant; thou hast been faithful in a very little, have
thou authority over five cities." In the parable of the talents, the
first servant comes and says, "Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five
talents; behold, I have gained beside them five talents more. His
lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant; thon
hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many
things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord." The second comes and
says, "Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have
gained two other talents beside them. His lord said unto him, Well
done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few
things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the
joy of thy lord."
We have but to put the two narratives together to bring out the
distinction which is made in the reward conferred upon the two ser-
vants in the parable of the pounds, and the absence of any such dis-
tinction in the case of the two servants in the parable of the talents,
584 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
He who of one pound had made ten, gets the lordship over ten cities;
he who of one pound had made five, gets the lordship over five — an
exact proportion kept between the service rendered, the increase
effected, and the reward bestowed. But he who doubled his two
talents, though putting a less amount of gain into his master's hand,
yet in the way of improvement of his powers and opportunities had
done as much as he who doubled his five. You find no difference,
accordingly, made between them; the praise and the award are fch
same with both. One can scarcely believe that the variation here is
accidental and insignificant, it carries with it so striking a verification
of the divine declaration, " Every man shall receive his own reward
according to his own labor."
But while the primary and direct reward is thus meted out in such
exact proportion to the zeal, fidelity, and success with which the ori-
ginal gift is employed, yet when the lost pound and the lost talent
came to be disposed of, they were each at once handed over to the
one who had most already, without respect to the previous service
or increase. Had these been taken into account, he who out of two
talents had gained other two would have had as good a claim to the
forfeited talent as he who out of five talents had gained other five,
while he who of one pound had made five, would have been entitled
to a proportionate share of the disposable pound. AH such claims,
however, are overlooked. It is to him that hath the most that it is
given, that he may have the more abundantly. In the curiously
modified structure of these two parables, by that wherein they agree
and that wherein they differ — how stiikingly is the double lesson
taught, that while each man's proper and direct reward shall exactly
tally with his proper and individual work, yet that in the distribution
of extra or additional favors regard shall be had to existing position,
existing possessions, existing capability; that the awards of heaven
shall be adjusted in duplicate proportion to the service previously
rendered, and to the capacity presently possessed.
Let us not pass Without remark the free and unconstrained, the
warm and generous commendation which is expressed in the " Well
done, good and faithful servant." Doubtless there had been deficien-
cies; these servants had not always been as diligent as they might
have been; many an opportunity had they let slip unimproved ; many
a time had they been idle when they should have been active, sloth-
ful when they should have been watchful; and even in their most
diligent endeavors to turn to best account their master's means, an
eye that tpyj curiously scanned all their motives might easily have
detected imperfections and flaws. But their generous Lord and Mas-
THE PAEABLE OF THE TALENTS. 585
ter does not in the day of reckoning go back thus upon the past to
drag out of it all that could be brought up against them. He takes
the gross result, and sees in it the proof and evidence of a prevailing
fidelity. Ungrudgingly, and without any drawback, he pronounces
his sentence of commendation, and bestows his rich rewards. No
earthly lord or master, in fable or in fact, on any day of reckonbg,
ever dealt so generously with those who had tried to serve him, as
our heavenly Lord and Master will deal with us, if honestly, sin-
cerely, devotedly, though with all our manifold imperfections, we give
ourselves to the doing of his good and holy will.
These good and faithful servants thus commended and thus
rewarded, are they not held out as examples and encouragements ?
Is it wrong then to work the work of him that hath sent us into this
world, or to be animated to increased diligence in that work, in order
that we too may receive a similar commendation and share a like
reward ? Does any caution and reserve in the employment of such
an argument — the holding out of such an inducement — mark the
writings of the New Testament? Do the inspired teachers, when
they hold up the rewards of immortality before our eyes, surround
the exhibition with warnings against the imagination that any work
of man can have any worth or be at all rewardable in the sight of
God? Do they think it necessary to check and to guard every
appeal of this kind which is made by them ? Listen to the manner
in which St. Paul speaks on this subject: "Let no man beguile you
of your reward. Be not deceived, God is not mocked. He that
soweth to the flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption, and he that
soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. Let us
not be weary in well-doing, for in due season we shall reap, if we
faint not. Be ye steadfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the
work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labor shall not bt,
in vain in the Lord." Hear the manner in which St. Peter speaks to
those who had obtained like precious faith with himself : " Where-
fore, giving all diligence, add to your faith virtue; and to virtue
knowledge; and to knowledge temperance; and to temperance pa-
tience; and to patience godliness; and to godliness brotherly kind-
ness; and to brotherly kindness charity For if ye do these
things, ye shall never fall : for so an entrance shall be ministered unto
you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Sav-
iour Jesus Christ." "Look to yourselves, that we lose not those
things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward."
Above all, listen to the frequency, the particularity, the earnestness
with which our Lord and Saviour himself urges this consideration
586 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
upon Lis disciples. Would Le comfort tLem under tLe world's re-
proacL ? " Blessed are ye," Le says, " wLen men sLall revile you, and
persecute you, and say all manner of evil against you falsely for my
sake; rejoice and be exceeding glad, for great is your reward in
Leaven." Would Le warn tLem against ostentation in religion—
against being led away by tLe example of tLose wLo, by making long
prayers, prayers in tLe synagogues and corners of tLe streets, enjoyed
a large popular reputation for piety ? " But tLou, wLen tliou pray-
est," Le says, " enter into tLy closet, and wLen tLou Last shut thy
door pray to thy Father which is in secret, and thy Father which
seeth in secret shall reward thee openly." Would he stir them up
to works of love, to deeds of compassion? "He that receiveth a
prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet's reward,
and he that receiveth a righteous man in the name of a righteous
man shall receive a righteous man's reward; and whosoever shall
give a cup of cold water only in the name of a disciple, verily I say
unto you he shall in no wise lose his reward." Nor has the Saviour's
language changed, when after his ascension he shows himself to the
beloved disciple. Among the latest of all Christ's reported words
are these : " Behold, I come quickly, and my reward is with me, to
give to every man according as his work shall be. Blessed are they
that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of
life, and may enter in through the gates into the city." Is heaven,
then, to be represented as a place our right to enter which is to be
won by our good works ? No ; to set forth heaven as a reward to be
secured by human effort, by human worth, is a very different thing
from setting forth a reward in heaven as that which is to crown every
act of love and service which the Christian renders. Scripture never
does the former. The sinner's acceptance with God, his title to eter-
nal life, it attributes solely and exclusively to the merits of the Re-
deemer. From the office of justifying us in God's sight, our own
works, of whatever kind they be, are absolutely and utterly excluded.
But this does not imply that all the works of one who has not been
justified, are utterly valueless and vile. The strict morality of that
young man whom Jesus looked on, and whom Jesus loved, was not
thus valueless, was not thus vile in the Redeemer's sight, and neither
should it be in ours. Still less does it imply that the works of one
who has been justified can have no such worth or merit as to be in
any way rewardable. In the strictest sense of the term, no creature,
however high and holy, can merit anything at the hands of its Crea-
tor—that is, claim anything from God properly as his due ; for what
has he that he has not received ? and whatever he do, he does but
THE PARABLE OF THE TALENTS. 58?
what God has a right to claim from him, and which consequently can
give him no right to claim anything of God. But in that secondary
sense in w r hich alone we speak of worth, merit, rewardability, as
attaching to human character, to human actions, you find in Holy
Writ that the true Christian's works of faith and labors of love are
spoken of as sacrifices acceptable, well pleasing to God, drawing
after them here and hereafter a great reward.
There is no danger of urging to Christian work by a respect to
the recompense of that reward in heaven which it shall bring here-
after in its train, if only we have a right conception of what kind of
work it is that is there rewarded, and what kind of reward it is that
it entails.
Had the servants in either of those parables which we have now
before us been trading with the pounds or with the talents, in the
belief that these were their own, or with the view of keeping the
whole profits that they realized to themselves, the " Well done, good
and faithful servant" would never have been pronounced on them,
and into their hands no reward of any kind would in the day of
reckoning have been put.
"Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds;" the one pound was
his lord's at the beginning, and the ten pounds are his lord's at the
end. It is this fidelity and zeal in the management of another's
property for another's behoof which is rewarded by the lordship over
the ten cities. And even so is it of all spiritual service rendered unto
Christ. Whatever is its outward form, however like to that which
Christ requires, yet if it spring from a selfish or mercenary motive, if
it be done w T ith no other aim than to secure a personal advantage, it
comes not within the range of that economy of reward w 7 hich Christ
has instituted in his kingdom.
Again, the rewards which the good and faithful servants are
represented here as receiving, consist in their elevation to rule and
authority — a rule and authority not absolute or independent, not
to be exercised for their own individual glory or their own indi-
vidual good — a rule and authority to be held by them but as under-
governors, in subjection still to their Lord and Master, and to be
exercised by them for the good of his great empire. The reward con-
sists but in a higher species of the same kind of service which they
had rendered. The wages they have earned are made up of b
larger quantity and a higher kind of work. You may bribe a mail
to diligent and continued labor in a work to which he has no heart.,
and under a master whom he cares little or nothing for, by holding
out a tempting wage; but then the wage must be different from the
588 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
work, a wage of a kind which the man covets, for a work to which
he is indifferent, or which is distasteful. But who would enter the
service of any master, if the only wage that was offered was so much
more work to do ? who but he who loved the work for the work's
sake and the master's sake, and to whom, in consequence of that
love to him and it, no more tempting offer could be held out than
a largei- sphere of labor and a larger power to fill it? Such, and
no other, are the terms of the Christian service. Such, and no other,
the wages that our Heavenly Master holds out to all the laborers in
his earthly vineyard. Do you love that Master with all your heart ?
Is it the highest aim of your being to serve him ? Is it the deepest
joy of your heart when you are able to do him any service ? Then,
toiling laborer, look onward, upward to your heavenly reward. Now
you often have but little liking to the spiritual service. Then your lik-
ing for it shall be so strong, you will never be able to keep your hand
for a moment from the doing of it. Lazily, impurely, imperfectly
is the work executed now ; ardently, unremittingly, perfectly shall it
be done then, and in such doing you shall enter into the joy of your
Lord.
XIII.
The Day op Judgment.*
TUESDAY.
"God hath appointed a day in which he will judge the world in
righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained, whereof he hath
given assurance unto all men in that he hath raised him from the
dead." "The Father hath committed all judgment unto the Son."
"We must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ." We
might have imagined that all the ends of a judgment to come might
have been gained by its taking effect on each separate spirit on
its passage after death into the presence of the great Judge, its
consignment thereafter to its appropriate condition. Besides this,
however, we are taught that there is to be a time, a day specially
set apart — at the resurrection from the dead, for the public, simul-
taneous judgment of our whole race. Having warned his disciples
of its approach, Jesus proceeds to describe some of this great day's
incidents.
His final advent for judgment is to take the world by surprise.
• Matt. 25:31-34.
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 589
It is to come as in the night the thief cometh, as in the day the
flash of lightning bursts from the bosom of the thunder-cloud. The
day before its last shall see nothing unusual in the earth. Over
one -half the globe the stir and bustle of life shall be going on as
in the days before the flood. They shall be eating and drinking,
buying and selling, marrying and giving in marriage; the market-
places full of eager calculators, the fields of toiling laborers, the
homes of thoughtless, happy groups. - In the quiet churchyard the
group of mourners shall be gathered around the last opened grave,
the coffin shall have reached its resting-place, and the hand of the
gravedigger be raised to pour the kindred earth upon the dead.
Over the other half of the globe the inhabitants shall have gone
to rest ; the merchant dreaming of to-morrow's gains, the senator of
his next day's oration. Awake in his solitary chamber the student
shall be writing at his desk; and in the banquet-room the lights
shall be glittering, and the inviting table spread, and dance and
song and ringing laughter shall be there. Just then, without herald
sent or note of warning given, the Lord himself shall descend from
heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and the trump
of God. That shout, the trumpet-call of heaven — that only sound
that ever spanned at once the globe, and was heard the same
moment at either pole — how at its fearful summons shall the sleepers
start up, their dreamings all cut short ! The pen shall drop from
the writer's hand; and a shivering terror, like that which filled
Belshazzar's hall, shall run through the banquet-room, and the jest
half uttered, the song half sung, they shall stare at one another
in pale affright! In the thronging market-place the buyer shall
forget the price he offered, the seller the price he asked: in the
toiling harvest-field, the stooping reaper shall look up, and as he
looks, the last cut grain of earth shall drop out of his hand; and in
the quiet churchyard the work of burial shall be stopped, and the
mourners shall see a strange commotion in the grave ; for it shall do
more, that trumpet-blast of judgment, than waken all the sleeping,
arrest all the waking inhabitants of the globe. It shall go where
sound never went; it shall do what sound never did; it shall pene-
trate the stony monument; it shall pierce the grassy mound. Far
down through many a fathom of the heaving waters shall it descend ;
over the deep bed of ocean shall it roll. And at its summons the
sea shall give up the dead that are in it; and death and Hades the
dead that are in them. liaised from their graves, the dead, both
small and great, shall stand before the Lord. They shall "be caught
up to meet the Lord in the air;" lifted up above that earth upon
590 THE LIFE OE CHRIST.
which the renovating fire shall already be preparing to do its work,
What a strange assemblage ! The babe that had been born but an
hour before ; the ancient man who, in the times before the flood, had
lived for nigh a thousand years; the first buried, the last buried, the
half -buried —all the vast congregation of the dead mingling with the
hosts of the living. And this great company, as it rises to meet the
Lord in the air, is to approach another, it may be as large, descend-
ing from the heavens. For when the Son of man shall come in his
glory to judge the earth, "all his holy angels" are to come with him.
Heaven for the time is as it were to empty itself of its inhabitants ;
their shining ranks are to line the skies, their bright forms bending
in eagerness over the impending scene. And yet another company,
of other aspect, is to be there — those angels " which kept not their
first estate, but left their own habitation, reserved in everlasting
chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day:" hell
from beneath moved to meet the Lord at his coming; its demon
hosts drawn up unwillingly into close proximity with those who
once in the ages long gone by had been their associates in the
heavenly places. Hell and heaven brought thus for once together,
with earth coming in between, that from its intervening companies
each may draw to itself all it can claim as properly its own, and
then, with a contrast heightened by the temporary contact and the
fresh accessions gained, to part for ever.
Soon as all the nations are gathered before him, the Judge shall
send forth his angels, and by their agency shall separate them one
from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats; and
"he shall set the sheep on his right hand, and the goats on his
left." This separation shall take place in silence. Child shall meet
that day with parent, and friend with long-lost friend; and parent
shall part from child, and friend from friend — no welcomes given, no
questions asked, no farewells taken. On him who fills that throne,
set there for judgment, shall every eye be fixed, and in stillness deep
as death shall each ear wait to drink in the sentence from his lips
Then, as in this mute and awful expectation all are standing, " shall
the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my
Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation
of the world.' 1 Every clause, almost every word here, is rich in
meaning.
"Then shall the King say" — it is a king, it is ike King, the King
of kings, the Lord of lords, who speaks. Visibly now before tho
assembled universe shall Jesus of Nazareth be enthroned. He who
when here with us on earth, veiled his glory, took no higher titlo
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 591
than the Son of man, was content to stand before an earthly judg-
ment-seat and be doomed to die — shall come now with power and
great glory He shall come, as we are told in one place, in his own
glory ; as we are told in another, in the glory of the Father. With
all the essential glory of his native divinity, even that glory which
he had with the Father before the world was— with all the addi-
tional accumulated glory accruing to him in virtue of his having
triumphed over death and hell for us men and for our salvation,
shall he be then visibly invested. He shall "sit upon the throne of
his glory." What this throne is as to its outward form and splendor,
it may be idle to imagine. It is described in one scripture as a
great white throne. Daniel, speaking of the appearance of the Son
of man, says that "his throne was like the fiery flame." He is to
come, we are distinctly told, in the clouds of heaven. It was in
a cloud that Jesus was borne up out of the apostles' sight as they
gazed up towards heaven as he went up, and the two men in white
apparel, who stood by them, said, "Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye
gazing up into heaven? This same Jesus, which is taken up from
you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him
go into heaven." Acts 1 : 11. It may be on a cloud-woven throne that
Jesus shall then appear. If so, the clouds that form it shall have t\
hvilliance brighter far than that of any which have ever floated in
our skies; their splendor caught not from the shining on them of
a far- distant sun, but coming from an inner glory too bright for
human gaze, of which their richest lustre is but a dim shadow — that
shadow serving as a veil to shade and drape it, so as human eye
may look upon it. But whatever its substance, whatever its form,
it shall be in sight of all, a throne — the throne of judgment, to
whose occupant the great and solemn work, one for which omnis-
cience is needed, which the Omniscience alone could properly dis-
charge, has been committed. Doubts have been entertained by
some of the true and proper divinity of Jesus Christ. When he
comes, and is seen seated upon that throne with that royal retinue
of angels around him, and undertakes and executes that mighty
office of the Judge of all the earth, shall any doubts of his divinity
be cherished then? How suitable a thing in the arrangements of
the divine government does it appear, that he who submitted to all
the scorn and the contumely, the suffering and the death, for out
redemption, should thus, at the winding up of the world's affairs,
have assigned to him this office of trust and honor; that to him
every knee should be made then to bow\ and every tongue confer
that he is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
592 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
" Tlie king shall say to those on his right hand." To them he first
shall turn, on them he shall first fix his eye ; and when he takes the
survey of that countless host stretching far and wide away, till it
mingles with the crowd of angels gathering in arid pressing near to
those whom they wait to hail as members of the holy, happy family
of the blessed, shall the spirit of the Redeemer not rejoice? In
sight of the multitude that no man can number, from every kindred,
and tribe, and people, and nation, all ransomed from sin and death
through him, shall he not see of the travail of his soul and be satis-
fied? It may be — none can tell — over the very scenes of his earthly
sorrows that he shall then hover. The approach to this world must
be made along some definite line, towards some definite locality. And
what more natural, what more likely than that the throne should rest
above the eminence on which the cross once stood ? And if, as he
once more nears the places — now seen for the last time, ere they pass
away amid dissolving fires — the sorrows of the great agony and death
that he there endured should rise up to his thoughts, would not the
sight of that goodly company of the redeemed on his right hand
make the very memory of them to minister an abounding joy? He
shall not be insensible to the triumph of his humiliation unto death
which that day shall disclose. It shall be with no unmoved or unre-
joicing spirit that he shall say, " Come, ye blessed of my Father,
inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the
world."
He shall say "Come" with what different feeling, with what a dif-
ferent effect, fioin what once attended the utterance of the same
word ! He had said once to all the sinful children of men, " Come
unto me, and I will give you rest." But he had to accompany and
to follow up the gracious invitation with the sad and sorrowful excla-
mation, " Ye will not come unto me that ye might have life." But no
danger now of this invitation being rejected, no sorrow to shade the
spirit of him who gives it. With all the exultation of one who asks
those to come who he knows will be all ready rejoicingly to follow,
does he utter the gracious word. "Come," he says; and each foot-
step is ready to advance, and each mansion in heaven "echoes back
the invitation, as if impatient to receive its guest."
" Come, ye blessed of my Father." His redeemed are not to be
recognized as those who have been plucked by him out of the hand
of an angry God, whom it has taken the very utmost, of service and
sacrifice on his part to appease and propitiate. They are the blessed
of the Father equally as they are the ransomed of the *3on. It is with
ihe Father's full approval that they are invited to the realms of bliss.
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 593
Hie pity, love, and mercy provided the lamb for the sacrifice; and
now that the first intentions of the redemption have been fulfilled in
them by their entering into peace with him, and their drinking in of
the spirit of his dear Son, his infinite benignity but waits to bless
thf m in the full enjoyment of himself throughout all eternity. '*, Ye
blessed of my Father." Here he pronounces the blessing who has
p wer to make it good. We ask God's blessing on those we love,
V. ut, alas ! we have not that blessing at command. It is often but the
vague wish of a kindly nature for others' happiness which takes that
forro. It is at best but the expression of a desire, the offering of a
petition, which it remains with another to grant or to refuse. But to
be called the blessed of the Father by Christ the Son, this is to be
made the very thing they are pronounced to be ; and blessed for ever
shall they be of him who made heaven and earth, whose large capa-
city to bless shall open all its stores, and lavish upon them all ite
bounties.
"Inherit the kingdom." It is a kingdom, nothing less thai a
kingdom, that is to be entered on, possessed, enjoyed; To rise to be
a king is the highest object of earthly ambition. To ascend a throne
is to reach the highest summit of earthly elevation. A crown is the
richest ornament the human brow can wear. And what is the bur-
den of the song of praise of the redeemed ? " Unto him that loved
us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us
kings and priests to God and his Father, to him be glory and domin-
ion for ever and ever." And what saith the Lord himself to all hi*
faithful followers ? " To him that overcometh will I give to sit with
me on my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my
Father on his throne." " Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give
thee a crown of life." Whether in the condition of the redeemed here-
after there shall be anything of an outward kind, of position and pre-
rogative, of authority and rule, corresponding to those of the kingly
estate, we need not now inquire. A few dim and scattered hints upon
this subject do meet our eye in the sacred Scriptures, upon which, if
it were cautiously attempted, some plausible enough conjectures might
be grounded. There is one kingdom, however, that we know of, into
full possession of which those on the right hand of the Judge shall
enter, the glory and the blessedness of which need no outward accom-
paniment to enhance them — the kingdom of which Jesus spake when
he said, "The kingdom of God is within you;" that kingdom which
is righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Ghost. Within the
heart of every true Christian this kingdom is even now set up and
established. But here, even in its best estate, the empire of God
Ufc of ClirUt 38
V
594 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
and Christ, of truth, of love, of holiness, is a sadly distracted and
divided one. It is sustained by constant conflict ; harassing always
the inward strife, and varied the fortunes of this changeful war. But
rejoice, all ye who have enlisted in this noblest of all conflicts, who,
following Christ, with him as your great leader and exemplar evei
before you, day by day are carrying on this inward warfare. The
rule of your spirit, the empire of your heart, you have given to the
Lord that bought you, and his finally, undividedly, for ever it shall
be. The struggle is not to last for ever. The enemies, so many, so
powerful, within and without, by whom you are so often overcome,
are not for ever to haunt and harass and assault. At death they
shall be driven from the field ; after death they shall cease to have all
power, and then, when on that great day you stand on the right hand
of the Judge, then shall the full, the perfect, the undivided reign of
holiness commence, and in every thought and affection and desire of
your heart doing willing homage to the Redeemer, in every faculty
of your being going forth in the utmost intensity of its exercise rejoi-
cingly to do his will, the kingdom shall be yours, Christ shall reign
in you, and you shall reign through him.
But this kingdom is to come to you by inheritance. It is not one
that you are to win by your own efforts, that you are to acquire as if
by right in virtue of any sacrifices made, any labors undergone, any
victories achieved. It is to become yours by heirship, by the will of
another, bestowed upon you as his children. You must first become
children of God by faith that is in Jesus Christ, and, being children,
then shall ye be heirs, heirs of God, joint-heirs with Jesus Christ.
The title to the heavenly inheritance links itself at once and insepara-
bly with our vital union to Christ our living Head. Let Christ be
ours by a humble trust, a loving embrace, a dutiful submission, then
heaven is ours by consequence as natural and necessary as the son is
heir to the possessions of his parent. Look ever, then, on that rich
inheritance, incorruptible, undefiled, that fadeth not away, as the
blood-bought purchase of the cross, the full completed title to which
is one of the things freely given you of God in Christ, to be instantly
and gratefully received in the very moment of your first believing.
Let your hope of heaven base itself thus from the first firmly upon
Christ, and it shall grow up into strength, and be indeed the anchor
of your soul, sure and steadfast, entering into that within the veil.
The kingdom " prepared for you from the foundation of the world.' ;
The preparation oT this kingdom for us, of us for this kingdom, is no
secondary, no subsidiary device, no afterthought of God. The re-
demption that is through Jesus Christ our Lord is not to be thought
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 595
of bj us as a scheme or plan fallen upon simply to meet and mitigate
the evils of the Fall. The primary, the parent, the eternal purpose
of the Supreme in the creation and government of the world, was to
make and fashion here the materials out of which a kingdom was to
be erected, to stand throughout eternity a glorious monument of his
wisdom, mercy, righteousness, and love. For this the foundations of
the world were laid, for this was sin suffered to enter, for this did the
Son of the Eternal become incarnate; for this he lived, he suffered,
he died, he rose again ; for this are we all being passed through the
sifting, testing, humbling, purifying, and sanctifying processes which
make up the spiritual web and tissue of our earthly life. How weighty
the argument to give ourselves heart and soul, all we are and all we
have, to Christ, that in us and by us, the earliest, the dearest, the
dominant design of our heavenly Father may be fulfilled. Shall we,
by our indifference, our worldliness, our selfishness, our ungodliness,
be parties to the defeating of this so ancient, so infinitely benignant
purpose of the Most High ? Should any of us doubt that if in sim-
plicity of purpose we turn to Christ, and give ourselves to him, aught
like repulse or failure shall await us ? Will God refuse to do that in
us and for us, the doing whereof to and for sinners such as we are
has been one of the very things that from eternity has lain the near-
est to his heart ?
We know but little of what awaits us after death. It would ap-
pear, however, from all that the Scriptures say, that the first time that
ever with bodily eye we shall look upon our Lord and Saviour, shall
be on that day when he shall come sitting on the throne of his glory,
when before him we and all the nations of the earth shall be gath-
ered. If so, the first words that we shall ever hear issuing audibly
from his sacred lips shall be these — may heaven in mercy grant it
shall be as spoken of us, and to us, that they shall fall upon our ear —
" Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for
you from the foundation of the world."
.096 THE LIFE OE CHRIST.
XIV.
The Day of Judgment.*
TUESDAY.
Is Christ's description of his last coming to judge the world, aa
given in the twenty-fifth chapter of St. Matthew's gospel, a parable
like the three that precede it ? While substantially true, that is, true
as to the great fact that it announces and the great lesson it conveys.,
is it nevertheless to be taken as a story of the imagination, whose
fancied incidents are but the drapery with which the hand of the great
Artist clothes the fact and illustrates the lessons ? We cannot believe
so. The transition at the thirty-first verse from the style of the par-
able to that of plain and simple narrative is too marked to be over-
looked or set aside. The Son of man, who takes the place of the
nobleman and the bridegroom, is a real not a figurative character,
and all that is said in the thirty-first, thirty-second, thirty- third, and
thirty-fourth verses bears the marks of a faithful recital of what is
actually to happen when the last day of the world's history arrives.
But after the separation between the righteous and the wicked has
been effected, is the Judge to enter upon such a formal statement of
the grounds upon which the sentence in either case is based ? and is
there actually to be such a colloquy between him and those on his
right hand and those on his left as is here recorded ? We can scarcely
believe this. It is difficult even to conceive how or by whom so great
a multitude on either side could conduct such a colloquy with the
Judge as is here recited. Nor is it necessary to believe that such
verbal communications should pass to and fro in order to get at the
true bearing and import of the passage. The Judge is represented
as adducing a single test, the application of which to the righteous
and the wicked brings out one great distinctive feature of the differ-
ence between them. It cannot surely be meant that the one point on
which the sentence is made here to hinge constitutes the only one of
which any cognizance will be taken, and on which the decisions of
the day will rest; or, admitting that there are others, that it stands
out so conspicuously above and beyond them all, that it alone is
regarded as furnishing the ground and reason of the verdicts given.
We are inclined rather to believe that the single point of difference
between those on the right hand and those on the left of the Judge
is fixed upon as in itself supplying one of the most delicate, most
* Matt. 25 : 35-46.
L_
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 597
discriminating, least fallible external proofs of the presence or the
absence of that character of true discipleship to Jesus Christ, upon
which the judgment proceeds. Outward acts or habits of the life,
quoted and referred to by the Judge as the foundation of his judg-
ments, could be so employed only in so far as they carried with them
conclusive evidence as to the inner state of the mind and heart, only
in so far as they were faithful and sufficient exponents of the inner
springs and motives from which they flowed. But is there any kind
or class of actions singularly and preeminently fitted, by their being
always done by the one, and their being never done by the other,
to mark off the true from the false, the real from the nominal follow-
ers of the Eedeemer? I apprehend there is — the very kind and
class of deeds which the Judge here lays his hand upon as charac-
teristic of those standing on his right hand ; for it is not any or every
kind of feeding the hungry, or visiting the sick, or clothing the na-
ked, that will meet the description here given. Those acts of com-
passion, love, and mercy which can alone truly and fully appropriate
that description to themselves, must have these two peculiar qualitiec
belonging to them: 1. They must be done to the brethren of the
Lord, so done as to justify the strong and striking language, "I was
a hungered, and ye gave me meat : I was thirsty, and ye gave me
drink : I was a stranger, and ye took me in : I was sick, and ye visit-
ed me : I was in prison, and ye came unto me." 2. They must be
such that the doers of them were often, if not always, unconscious at
the time that what they did was done unto Christ, else they could not
honestly have answered as they did.
To whom, then, does Christ refer, when he speaks of the least of
these his brethren, the rendering of any service to whom he reckons
as so much kindness rendered to himself? For an answer to this
leading question I refer you to two other sayings of our Lord. The
first occurs at the close of his address to the apostles on sending them
forth, when, after laying down in the plainest and most emphatic
terms the character and condition of the Christian discipleship, he
went on to say, " He that receiveth you, receiveth me ; and he that
receiveth me, receiveth him that sent me. He that receiveth a proph-
et, in the name of a prophet, shall receive a prophet's reward ; and
he that receiveth a righteous man, in the name of a righteous man,
shall receive a righteous man's reward. And whosoever shall give to
drink unto one of these little ones a cup of cold water only in the
name of a disciple, verily I say unto you, he shall in no wise lose his
reward." Matt. 10 : 40-42. Here the kind of giving which is in no
wise to lose its reward is not simply the giving to one of Christ's lit-
V
598 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
tie ones — which any one might do unawares, giving simply to the
thirsty without regard to what they were — but it is giving to them in
the name of a disciple. The expression, "in the name of a disciple,"
is in itself ambiguous. It might either mean giving as a disciple,
that is, as one who bore that name or character ought to give, Dr it
might mean giving to another because the other bore and possessed
the character and name. There is another saying of our Lord which
clears away this ambiguity, recorded in the gospel by St. Mark,
chap. 9 : 41 : " For whosoever shall give you a cup of water to drink
in my name, because ye belong to Christ, verily I say unto you, he
shall not lose his reward." If this and the saying already quoted be
accepted as containing the true explanation of the words spoken by
the Judge, his citation must be restricted to acts of kindness done to
Christ's true disciples, on the specific ground of their character as
such. There must be then some striking peculiarity attaching to
such acts entitling them to be employed under such circumstances
for so great and grave a purpose. Whatever this peculiarity be, we
have advanced so far as to perceive that it depends on the connection
between those to whom the kindnesses are shown and Christ. It
must be therefore in the character of that motive which would lead
us specially to sympathize with and to succor those standing in this
connection. In common life there are two kinds of connection which
one man may have with another, the existence of either of which
might generate a claim upon our sympathy and help. There may be
the connection of relationship, and there may be the connection of
resemblance. You recognize the claim springing from the first of
these when you say that you cannot see the son of your best bene-
factor, or of your old and faithful friend, in want, unpitied and unre-
lieved. You recognize the claim springing from the other when you
say that one, so like in character, in principle, in taste, in habit, to
the friend whom you admire above all others, to whom you are most
tenderly attached, has a hold involuntarily upon your heart. Between
the two there is this difference, that if relationship be the only ground
on which you act, the idea of that relationship must be distinctly
before your mind ; whereas, if it be similarity of character that sup-
plies the impulse to benevolence, there may be at the time no felt or
conscious reference to the person, likeness to whom may nevertheless
form the secret spring of your conduct. As regards the union be-
tween Christ and all his true and faithful followers, the two species
of connection — of relationship and of resemblance — are not only
invariably to be found together, but you have no other sure means of
knowing where the one tie, that of discipleship, exists, but by obser-
L
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 599
vitg where the other, that of likeness, is manifested. The living
heart-union with Christ which constitutes the central essential ele-
ment of the Christian character, is no bare external bond, such as
earthly relationships so often are. It never does, it never can exist
without more or less of the spirit of the Saviour himself being poured
into the heart, more or less of a likeness to Christ being impressed
upon the life. To discern the image of the Saviour so produced, in
its dimmest and most broken, as well as in its fullest and brightest
forms, and to feel the force of that attraction which this image exerts,
the observer himself must have been fashioned into the same image,
must have drunk in of the same spirit. But every one that loveth
him that begat, loveth also all who are begotten of him; a secret
sympathy, a bond of true and deep and everlasting brotherhood
binds all together who are one in Christ — one in the participation of
his Spirit; nor is it necessary to the force of that attraction being
felt which draws them to one another, that a distinct or conscious
regard be had either to Christ himself personally or to the common
relationship in which they stand to him.
" Oft ere the common source be known,
The kindred drops will claim their own,
And throbbing pulses silently
Move heart to heart by sympathy."
You may love, you may pity, you may help one of Christ's little
ones without having Him before your thoughts, just as you may
admire the splendor of a broken sunbeam without thinking of the
orb of light; nay more, the farther he and the relationship are for
the moment out of sight, the more purely and entirely that the sym-
pathy and aid spring spontaneously from seeing and admiring and
loving in a suffering brother the meekness and the gentleness, the
patience and the devout submission which Christian faith inspires,
the clearer and less doubtful the evidence that the same faith dwells
in your own bosom, working there like results. The charity which
flows unbidden from that inwrought kindredship of disposition by
which all true followers of the Lamb are characterized, waiting not,
when it sees a suffering brother, to make the inference that his be-
longing to Christ cQnfers upon him a title to relief — springs not from
any anticipation of reward. It flows at once out of that love to
Christ, supreme, predominant, which has taken possession of the
beart. And hence the explanation of the answer which the righteous
are represented as making to the declaration of the Judge — the sim-
ple, natural utterance of humility and surprise : "Lord, when saw we
thee a hungered, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?
V
60( THE LIFE OF CHBIST.
when saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed
the* 3 /? or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came to thee?
A.nd the King shall answer and say unto them, Yerily I say unto you,
Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye
did i* "into me."
Should any one, then, under the impression that the first question
to which in the great judgment he would have to give reply, would
be this, " Did you ever relieve any of Christ's brethren because of
their being such ?" feeling unfurnished and anxious to provide him-
self with a sufficient and satisfactory answer, go forth immediately
and seek out some destitute disciples and minister to their wants,
would mich a ministry of benevolence as that suit the requirements
of the Judge ? Assuredly not. You might to any extent feed the
hungry, or clothe the naked, or visit the sick; those whom you thus
clothed and fed and visited might be brethren of the Lord; nay, you
might select them as the objects of your charity on that very account,
and yet after all your charity might be but selfishness in disguise,
utterly wanting that element so delicately and beautifully brought
out in the answer of the righteous, of being the unconscious emana-
tion of a true love and a true likeness to Jesus Christ. No charity of
mere natural instinct, no charity of outward show or artificial fabric,
ao charity but that which is the genuine, spontaneous, untainted prod-
uct of a profound personal attachment to the Saviour, will meet the
requirements of the Judge. And the more you study the deeds to
which he points, and which are here described, the more will you be
convinced that a more truthful and delicate test of the presence and
power of such ?n attachment could not have been selected than that
which the performance of such deeds supplies.
Let us turn now for a moment to the sentence passed upon those
standing on the left hand of the Judge : " Depart from me, ye cursed,
into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels." How
striking the antithesis between this and the sentence passed upon
the righteous! The "Come" of the one has its counterpart in the
"Depart" of the other; "ye blessed," its counterpart in "ye cursed."
But it is not, "ye cursed of my Father." The blessing had come
from him. The Son as Judge attributes it to the Father. But the
curse comes from another source. The Judge will not connect his
Father's name with it. The wicked have drawn down the curse
upon their own heads; its fountainhead is elsewhere than in the
bosom of eternal love. The kingdom, upon the inheritance of which
the righteous are called to enter, is not spoken of as an everlasting
kingdom. There was no need of so describing it ; by its very nature
THE DAY OF JUDGMENT. 601
it is a kingdom that cannot be shaken, can never be removed. But
the fire is called an everlasting fire, to remind us that so long as ever
in the bosom of the sinful the fuel for that flame exists, it must burn
on, the ever sinning bringing the ever suffering with it in its traia.
But here again there is a variation of the phrase. In the one case it
is a kingdom prepared for the righteous themselves from the founda-
tion of the world; in the other it is a fire prepared for the devil and
his angels. Can we believe this variation to be unintentional and
insignificant? Shall we not gladly accept the truth that lies conceal-
ed in it, that God delighteth in mercy, and that judgment is his
strange work?
Then follows the colloquy between the Judge and the condemned,
by far the most impressive thing in which, to our eye, being this,
that the Judge does not in their case bring forward an opposite and
contrasted kind or class of actions to confront with those attributed
to the righteous, in order to indicate the presence within of an oppo-
site character, the operation in them of an opposite class of motives.
Against the cited deeds of mercy he does not set up as many deeds
of selfishness, or unkindness, or cruelty. He puts the whole stress
of the condemnatory sentence simply and alone upon the non-per-
formance of the service of love to his brethren, and through them to
himself. Had it been a merely moral reckoning with mankind that
was intended to be represented here, then surely so much positive
evidence on the one side would have been met with so much positive
evidence on the other. Had it been meant that all men were to be
divided into two classes, and acquitted or condemned according to
their respective kindliness or charitableness of disposition and con
duct, with whatever accuracy the dividing line be carried throughout
the entire mass of mankind, such infinite variety of shades of char-
acter and modes of conduct are there that those nearest to the line
on one side would approach so closely to those nearest to it on the
other, that it would be very difficult to make out the equity of an
adjustment which would raise the one to heaven and consign the
other to hell. It is however upon no such principle that the separa-
tion is represented here as being conducted. The great, the primary
requirement, the presence or the absence of which fixes the position
of each class on the right hand or upon the left of the Judge, is love
to Christ, likeness unto him, as tested and exhibited in deeds of kind-
less done unto his poor afflicted suffering children. Apart from such
fove, such likeness to the Lord himself, you cannot have the special
affection to his brethren. That special affection cannot subsist with-
out running out into countless acts of compassion, of needful and
602 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
generous help. As to Christ himself, then, it is not our knowledge,
nor our faith, that is to furnish the ground of our being numbered
with those who are to stand on the right hand of the Judge. Infinite
may be the variety, both in kind and in degree, of the acquaintance
with the Saviour's character, the confidence in the Saviour's work.
In the multitude that no man can number there be those who saw
the day of Christ as afar off, who had but dim perceptions of the
personal character and high office executed by the great Eedeemet
of mankind. In one thing they shall agree : in having hearts linked
by the tie of a supreme affection to him, in having lives pictured over
with those many acts of loving tenderness and tender mercy here so
Binrply and so beautifully portrayed. As to our fellow-men, again, it
is not our honesty, our justice, our generosity, our fidelity, our natu-
ral benevolence which is to place us on the right hand of the Judge.
It is how we have felt, it is how we have acted towards the afflicted
brethren of Jesus. A narrow contracted circle this may appear, yet
one round which all the earthly virtues will be found to congregate,
finding there the bond that binds them all together as the fruits of
the Spirit, and wraps them all in harmonious and beautiful assem-
blage round the cross of the Crucified. He may be a kind man who
is not honest, an honest man who is not meek, a meek man who is
not pure ; but, take him who feeds the hungry, who clothes the naked,
who visits the sick, because of the spirit of Jesus implanted in his
own soul, and because of the image of the Saviour seen on them he
ministers to — this man's deeds of mercy will not be limited to that
one circle ; ready to show special kindness to those that are of the
household of the faith, he will be ready to do good unto all men as
God gives him the opportunity. Be not then over-careful, ye who
are members of this household, to distinguish among the poor and
the afflicted who are daily appealing to your benevolence, who do
and who do not belong to Christ. If so, you may be putting it out
of your power to join in the language put into the lips of the right-
eous, "Lord, when saw we thee a hungered?" Cultivate that large
diffusiveness of pity and of help, that would, if it could, feed all the
hungry, and give drink to all the thirsty, leave none who wanted
un visited and unrelieved. "Be not forgetful," said the apostle, "to
entertain strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels una-
wares." Angel footsteps no longer tread on earth, angels come not
now to our tent-doors. For angels clothed in human forms we may
no longer, as the patriarchs did, spread the table and lay out the
food But a greater than angels walks among us, in suffering, in
disguise. Christ himself is here— here in some hungry one to be fed,
OUTLINE STUDIES 603
some imprisoned one to be visited, some afflicted one to be comfort-
ed. Be not forgetful to let your sympathy and help range ovei the
whole field of suffering humanity; here and there you may be suc-
coring your Saviour unawares ; you may be pleasing him who identi-
fies himself with all his needy suffering children, and who will be
ready at last to say, " Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of the least of
these my brethren, ye did it unto me."
OUTLINE STUDIES.
Perhaps before our Lord left the western slope of Olivet, or during
the short course from that spot to Bethany, he said, " Ye know that
after two days is the feast of the Passover, and the Son of man is
betrayed to be crucified."
It was at a secret session of the Sanhedrim at the house of Caiaphas
that the plot was formed to put Jesus to death. This design was helped
when Judas, one of the twelve, met with the Jewish leaders and cov-
enanted for thirty silver shekels to betray his Master into their hands.
It was an act of unspeakable baseness and treachery, the result, it
would appear, of gradual deterioration of character through avarice
and opposition to Christ's spiritual program.
Then there comes a solemn pause, through Wednesday the Day
of Retirement and the early part of Thursday, the last day with his
Disciples. In the afternoon of Thursday our Lord sends Peter and
John to Jerusalem to engage a room and make ready for the Passover
meal.
When they assemble in the evening a strife breaks out as to which
shall be accounted the greatest. None being willing to minister, they
sit down with unwashed feet. It is then that Jesus rises, prepares
himself, and performs this menial service, giving them an example,
indelible in its impressiveness. A little later there comes the exposure
of Judas and his retirement. Not long after we have Peter's extreme
avowal of fealty and the Master's warning that the rash disciple's
failure and denial of his Lord is close at hand.
The Passover meal is now concluded and Jesus proceeds to institute
the sacred memorial of the gift of himself for the life of mankind.
Intimate, wonderful discourses and the high-priestly prayer follow,
and then, accompanied by the eleven, he goes to Gethsemane. The
agony of the garden is a part of his great sacrificial work as the Sin-
bearer.
Christ's request to his disciples to watch and pray, while he passed
C03a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
through the agony in the garden of Gethsemane, doubtless was in
part because of his desire for human sympathy and fellowship; but it
was more because of his knowledge that they would need the re-enforce-
ment which prayer would bring to their souls in the trying experiences
through which they were soon to pass. When Judas the betrayer and
all the band that accompanied him came to the garden they found
Jesus just risen from his knees, and therefore ready with complete
composure and strength of spirit to meet them and go through the hours
ever deepening with pain and buffeting till he expired on the cross.
Our Lord scarcely appears to be conscious of his own sufferings during
all the prolonged ordeal, and because his heart is stayed on God he is
sensitive to the needs of every soul around him. Because the apostles,
on the other hand, were sleeping instead of watching and praying
they forsook him and fled in fear and confusion.
PART IV. PASSION WEEK TO GETHSEMANE.
Study 19. Last Supper and Gethsemane.
(1) Looking toward Christ's betrayal 6036-605
a. Our Lord states that he is shortly to he betrayed to be crucified .... 6036
b. Judas meets the Sanhedrim at the house of Caiaphas 6036, 604
c. He agrees to betray his Master for thirty shekels of silver 604
d. What led him to the deed of treachery 604, 605
(2) Period op Christ's retirement 605, 606
a. From Tuesday evening to Thursday afternoon 605, 606
6. Probably in some quiet nook near Bethany 606
(3) Preparation for the Passover 606, 607
a. Peter and John sent to Jerusalem to make ready 606, 607
6. They secure a prepared room as Jesus indicated 606, 607
(4) Jesus and the eleven assemble for the Passover meal in the even-
ing 607-611
a. The strife as to which of them is greatest 607
6. Need that one should serve the others for the feet-washing 608
c. None of the apostles are willing to do this 608, 609
d. Typical of the love of place and pride of precedence in the
Church. . 608, 609
e. Jesus rises and performs the menial service 609
/. Significance of his act 610, 611
(5) Exposure and withdrawal of Judas 611-619
a. Order of the paschal supper 612-613
6. Jesus troubled in spirit 614
c. He states that one of the twelve will betray him 614
d. By different steps he designates Judas 615, 616
e. Judas retires from the room 616
/. The event interpreted 616-619
(6) Peter's professions and Christ's prediction '. . 619-622
a. Peter asserts that he will lay down his life for his Lord's sake. . . 619-621
6. Christ predicts that Peter will deny him 620
c. The invisible foe and tempter 621, 622
THE WASHING OF THE DISCIPLES' FEET. 6036
(7) General view of the Lord's Supper 622-630
a. Evidence of Christ's prescience 622-624
b. His devotion to his followers 624-626
c. The great enduring ordinance established 626-630
(8) Gethsemane 631-641
a. Transition from the supper to the garden 631-635
b. The Saviour's suffering for sin 635-638
c. Duty of disciples to watch, pray, and suffer with the Master 639-641
xv.
The Washing of the Disciples' Feet.*
THUKSDAY.
Jesus sat down upon the Mount of Olives, over against the tem-
ple ; and as the shadows of evening deepened in the valley of Kedron,
and crept up its sides, he addressed to his wondering disciples the
parables and prophecies preserved in the twenty-fourth and twenty-
fifth chapters of St. Matthew's gospel. It was after he had finished
all these sayings, either before he rose from his seat on the hillside^
or on his way out afterwards to the village, that he said to his dis-
ciples, "Ye know that after two days is the feast of the passover,
and the Son of man is betrayed to be crucified." He had previously
in his discourse been dealing with a broad and distant future, been
sketching the world's history, describing its close — giving no dates,
leaving much as to the sequence of events shadowy and undefined.
Now he turns to a nearer future, to an event that was to happen to
himself; and in terms free of all indistinctness and ambiguity ho
announces that the day after the next he would be betrayed, and
afterwards crucified.
It may have been about the very time that Christ himself was
speaking thus of his impending betrayal and crucifixion, that a secret
session of the Sanhedrim was assembling, not in its usual hall of
meeting, which formed part of the temple buildings, but in the house
of Caiaphas, which tradition has located on the Hill of Evil Counsel,
the height rising on the other side of the city from the Mount of.
Olives, across the valley of Hinnom. To this house of Caiaphas,
wherever it was situated, the chief priests, and scribes, and elders of
the people now resorted to hold their secret conclave. They met in a
* Matt. 26 : 1-5. 14-19; Mark 14 : 1, 2, 11-17 ; Luke 22 : 1-30 ; Jonn 13 : 1- 20.
604 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
chafed and angry mood. For three consecutive days Jesus had been
denouncing and defying them, in the most open manner, in the most
public places. They had tried all their art to weaken his reputation,
to put him wrong with the people or with their rulers, to extort from
him somo saying that might betray ignorance or involve blasphemy
or treason. They had been more than defeated ; their own weapons
had been turned against themselves ; the bitterest humiliation had
been inflicted on them. There was but one remedy. They must
meet this man in the temple courts no more. Never again must they
allow themselves to be dragged into personal collision with him.
There was but one seal for lips like his — the seal of death, and the
soonet it were imposed the better. They had no difficulty in coming
to the conclusion that he must die. But as old and practised politi-
cians, who knew the people well, they hesitated as to the time and
manner of taking and killing him. An open arrest at this particular
time, when there were in and around Jerusalem such crowds of
ignorant country-people, among them such numbers of those fiery-
spirited Galileans, over whom Jesus had acquired so great an appa-
rent mastery, would be perilous in the last degree. And so, curbing
their wrath, they think it better to bide a while, and they said, " Not
at the feast time, lest there be an uproar among the people." What-
ever pain the self-restraint may have cost them was more than over-
come by the joy they felt when Judas came and said, " What will ye
give me, and I will deliver him unto you?" A hopeful sign this in
their eyes : one of this man's bosom friends turning against him,
having some good ground, no doubt, they think, to hate him, as he
evidently does. He can do for them the very thing they want : put
it in their power to seize Jesus in one of his secret haunts, and
come upon him " in the absence of the multitude." And he is quite
willing, obviously, to meet their wishes. Nor is he hard to bargain
with. They offer him thirty silver shekels, the fixed price in the old
law of the life of a servant, somewhere between three and four
pounds of our money. He accepts the offer, and it is agreed
between them that this sum shall be given him on his delivery
of Jesus into their hands. Neither he nor they at first imagine
that this will be done so speedily — even during the approaching
feast.
A baser piece of treachery, a fouler compact, there has never
been. Judas may not have been an utterly false man from the very
beginning of his attachment to Christ's person; it may not have
been pure and simple selfishness and greed that tempted him to
join the ranks of Christ's disciples. Once, however, admitted, to
THE WASHING OF THE DISCIPLES' FEET. 605
his own great surprise perhaps, among the twelve, and intrusted
with the care of the small common fund which they possessed, the
tow base spirit that was in him led him into all kinds of selfish and
covetous speculations and anticipations. As our Lord's career ran
on, it became more and more apparent that little room for indulging
these would be given. Disappointment grew into discontent. In
the loving, pure, unearthly, unselfish, good and holy Jesus, there
was nothing to attract, there was much to repel. The closer the
contact the more that repellant power was felt. Already, towards
the close of the second year of his attachment to Christ's person, ho
had said or done something to draw from the reticent lips of his
Master the declaration, "Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of
you is a devil?" John 6:70. Still later, his Master's whole bear-
ing, speech, and conduct, his retiring from the crowd, his courting
solitude, the deep shades of sadness on his countenance, his begin-
ning to tell his disciples privately but plainly, that he was about to
be taken from them, that a shameful and cruel death was about to
be inflicted on him, all this, little as Judas, in common with the rest,
may have understood or realized the actual issue that was impend-
ing, ran utterly counter to all his plans and hopes. Upon dis-
appointment, discontent, alienation, and disgust may have super-
vened, and in so ill a mood may Judas then have been, that the
rebuke a few days before at Bethany, Avhen he had interposed his
remark about the box of precious ointment, had galled him to the
uttermost, and whetted his spirit even to the keen edge of malice
and revenge. That all this may have been so does not interfere
with the belief that in the final stages of his treachery, other motives
besides those of personal malice and pure greed may have entered
into his heart and taken their share in prompting to the last black
deed that has stamped his name with infamy.
It would not appear that in the compact as at first made between
Judas and the Sanhedrim, there was any stipulation as to time.
His offer would facilitate a secret and safe arrest of Jesus, but it
may not have at once and entirely allayed their fears as to attempt-
ing this arrest during the feast. The conditions settled as to the
thing to be done, and the bribe to be paid for the doing of it, they
part, leaving it to Judas to find his own time and opportunity.
And now in the current of a narrative, which, ever since our
Lord's arrival in the neighborhood of Jerusalem, has been getting
quicker and more disturbed, there is a stop, a stillness. The
troubled waters sink lor a season out of sight, to rise again darker
and more vexed than ever. On the Tuesday evening Jesus retired
608 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
to Bethany, and we see nothing, know nothing of him for the next
day and a half. The intervening "Wednesday would, no doubt, be
given to quiet and repose. There are hollows in our own Arthur
Seat not as far from Edinburgh as Bethany was from Jerusalem,
in which one feels as far away from the noise and bustle of city
life as if in the heart of the Highlands. Such was the hollow in
which the favorite village lay, and there, in occupations unknown
to us, this one peaceful day was spent, and there at night he had
where to lay his head for his last sleep before his death — the night
and day recruiting him in body and in spirit for Gethsemane and
the cross.
On the Thursday afternoon he once more bent his steps towards
the holy city. He was to celebrate that evening the passover with
his disciples. Much in the way of preparation had to be done — the
selection of a suitable apartment, the killing of the lamb, the pro-
viding of the bread, the wine, and the salad of bitter herbs. Nothing
as yet had been arranged, and there was but little time to spare.
The disciples come to him saying, "Where wilt thou that we prepare
for thee to eat the passover?" Our Lord does not send them all at
rand m to do the best they could; he singles out Peter and John.
Though often singularly and closely associated afterwards, this, ]
believe, was the only time that Christ separated them from all the
rest, and gave them a conjunct task to perform. In sending them
before the others, he could easily and at once have indicated where
the room was in which they were to meet in the evening. Instead
of this he gives them a sign, the following of which was to conduct
them to it. This way of ordering it, whatever was its real purpose,
served effectually to conceal from the others the locality of the
guest-chamber, and may have been meant to keep the traitor in the
meantime in ignorance of a fact, his earlier knowledge of which,
communicated to the chief priests, might have precipitated the catas-
trophe, and cut off Gethsemane from our Saviour's passion.
"Go into the city, and when you enter there shall meet you a
man bearing a pitcher of water : follow him. And wheresoever he
shall go in, say ye to the good man of the house, The Master saith,
Where is the guest-chamber, where I shall eat the passover with my
disciples ?" Upon these passover occasions the inhabitants of the
metropolis opened their houses freely to strangers coming up from
the country; but was there no danger, if it were known that this
accommodation was required for him whose life the authorities were
seeking, that it might be denied? The singular message which
Peter and John were to deliver would reveal the very thing which,
THE WASHING OF THE DISCIPLES' FEET. 607
left to their own discretion, they might have wished to hide, for
could two men in Galilean garb and with Galilean accent speak of the
Master and his disciples, and it not be known of whom they spoke?
Coming from such a quarter, carrying with it such a tone of author-
ity, being, in fact, a command rather that a request, might not the
good man of the house be offended and refuse? The instructions,
however, are precise, and Peter and John follow them. All happens
as Christ had indicated. They go into the city, they meet the man with
the pitcher, they follow him, they deliver the message, and whether
it was that the man himself was a disciple of Jesus, or that he was
otherwise influenced, not only is there a ready and cordial compli-
ance on his part, but, when Peter and John are shown into the
apartment, they find it, as was not always the case, already fur-
nished and prepared. It was a momentous meeting which on this
last night of our Eedeemer's life was to take place in this room, one
never to be forgotten, to be had in memory by generation after gen-
eration, through all the after history of the church ; and everything
about it, even to the indicating of the place and the providing of
the needful furniture, was matter of divine foresight and care.
The accounts of the different evangelists are so broken and con-
fused that it is impossible to give anything like a regular connected
narrative of what happened that night within the guest-chamber.
At an early stage a strife broke out among the apostles as to which
of them should be accounted the greatest. This may have hap-
pened after the passover celebration had commenced. The first
thing done, when the company had assembled and sat down, was to
pass round a cup of wine, the first of the four that were circulated
in the course of the feast. If it was in doing so that they were
uttered, then our Lord's first words after sitting down were these:
"With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before
I suffer : for I say unto you, I will not eat any more thereof, until
it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. And he took the cup, and
gave thanks, and said, Take this and divide it among yourselves : for
I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the
kingdom of God shall come." Luke 22:15-18. Never before had
they sat down in such a formal manner with their Master at their
head. The circumstance of taking their places around this board
suggests to their narrow minds thoughts of the places and the
dignities that, as they fancied, were afterwards to be theirs; and
when, almost as soon as he had sat down, Jesus began to speak of
the kingdom as if he was just about to enter on it, the strife as to
which of them should be greatest in that kingdom arose-
(508 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
But this strife has been attributed to another origin, one which
links it in a manner so natural to the washing of the disciples' feet
as to predispose us to adopt it. The master of the house had relin-
quished for the strangers the best apartment of his dwelling, and
furnished it as well as he could. There was one duty of the host,
however, that he failed to discharge. He did not personally receive
the guests, nor preside at the washing of the feet, which always
preceded the beginning of a feast. He and his family and his
domestics were all themselves elsewhere engaged in the keeping of
the passover. He saw that in the room the necessary apparatus for
the washing, the basin and the water and the towel, were all pro-
vided, but he left it to the guests themselves to see that it was done.
But which of the twelve will do it for the others ? It is the office of
the servant, the slave; which of them will acknowledge that he
stands in any such relationship to the rest? Besides the settlement
of their respective places around the table, here was another root of
bitterness springing up to trouble them, raising the question of pre-
cedency among them.
Spring up how it might, we have the fact that around the first
communion table among the apostles, in the presence of their Mas-
ter, in the critical and solemn position in which he and they stood,
there was actually a quarrel about their individual rights and privi-
leges; a petty ambition, the love of place and power, finding its way
into the hearts of those most honored of the Lord, entering to defile
the most sacred season and solemnity. There is some excuse for
the twelve untaught Galilean fishermen, with all their vulgar concep-
tions at this time of what was coming when their Master's kingdom
should be instituted. But what shall we say of those who have had
the full light of the after revelations given, and who, in front of our
Lord's most solemn declaration that his kingdom is not of this world,
that the kind of authority and lordship that kings and princes assume
and exercise should not have place within his church, under the
garb of a glowing zeal, harbor as strong a love of place and power
as much vanity and pride, as much irritation of temper, as much
severity and uncharitableness, as is ever to be seen in the world oi
common life ? Alas for the strife of the first communion-table !
Alas for the strifes and debates of almost every ecclesiastical body
which since the days of Jesus Christ has been embodied in his name
You might have thought that in those churches where the distinctions
were the fewest and of the least value, where there was least of that
kind of food upon which the pride and vanity and ambition of our
nature feed, there would have been proportionately less of their
THE WASHING OF THE DISCll'LES' FEET. 009
presence and power. The fact, I think, rather lies the othei way,
for a reason not difficult to divine.
None of the twelve would do the part of the minister or the
servant to the others; and so, grumbling among themselves, they sit
down with unwashed feet. Jesus rises from the table, lays aside his
apper garment, pours water into the basin, takes the towel, girds
himself with it, and begins himself to do what none of them would
undertake. One of the first before whose feet the Saviour stooped
may have been Judas. We shall see presently that he has thrust
himself into a seat very near to, if not the next to that of Christ.
He allows his feet to be washed, not without a certain strange feel-
ing in heart, but without word spoken or remonstrance made. But
when Jesus approaches Peter, the impetuous apostle cannot remain
silent. "Lord," he says, lost in wonder, full of reverence, profoundly
sensible of the great gulf that separated himself and all the rest from
Jesus — "Lord, dost thou wash my feet?" He gets the calm reply,
"What I do thou knowest not now;"- — 'thou hast not yet dis-
cerned — though it needed no quick eye to see it — the purpose of rny
act; but thou shalt know hereafter, shalt know presently.' But the
impatient apostle will not submit and wait. Strong in his sense of
the unseemliness, the unsuitableness of the act, fancying that the
very love and reverence he bore to Jesus forbade him to permit it,
he declares, "Thou shalt never wash my feet." "If I wash thee not,
thou hast no part with me," is Christ's reply — a single slender beam
of light upon the darkness, enough to point to some higher spiritual
meaning of the act, not enough to reveal the whole significance of
the transaction to Peter's mind, but quite enough to turn at once
into quite an opposite channel the current of his feelings. "No part
with thee if thou wash me not ! then, Lord, not my feet only, bat
also my hands and my head." Taking up once more his act in its
symbolic character, as representative of the spiritual washing by
regeneration, Jesus saith to him, "He that is washed needeth not
save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit." For even as he who
in the ordinary roadway cleanses himself from outward defilement is
clean every whit, and needs no after washing save that of the feet — for
go where he may upon the dusty roads, every hour, and. at all times,
the feet are being soiled, and need renewed, repeated washings — so
is it true of him who hath gone down into the great layer, and
washed all sins away in the blood of the atonement, that he is clean
every whit, has all his sins forgiven, all the guilt of them removed,
and needs no after washing, saving that which consisteth in the
removal of the daily stains that are ever afresh, by our converse
LU.ofUhrUi 89
610- THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
with this world, being contracted. "And ye are clean," added
Jesus, "but not all." The words, but faintly understood, yet so
calmly and authoritatively uttered, effect their immediate object.
Peter silently submits; the work goes on; the circle is completed.
The feet of all are washed, no one after Peter venturing to resist 01
remonstrate.
The feet-washing in the guest-chamber by our Lord himself we
are inclined to regard as the greatest instance of his humiliation as a
man in the common intercourse of life, in the discharge of its ordinary
duties. He was at pains himself to guard it against misinterpreta-
tion : " So, after he had washed their feet, and had taken his gar-
ments, and was set down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I
have done to you ? Ye call me Master and Lord : and ye say well ;
for so I am." It was his being so infinitely their superior that lent
its grace and full significance to the act. And this superiority, so far
from cloaking, or with false humility pretending to disown, he asserts.
This is what makes the whole ministry of our Lord on earth so utterly
unlike that of any other man who has ever trodden it. No one ever
made pretensions so high ; no one ever executed offices more humble.
No one ever claimed to stand so far above the ordinary level of our
humanity ; speaking of himself as the light of the world, having rest
and peace and life for all at his disposal, to dispense as truly loyal
gifts to all who owned him as their spiritual King. No one ever made
himself more thoroughly one with every human being whom he met,
or was so ready with all the services that in his need one man may
claim from his brother.
"If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, ye
ought also to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an
example, that ye should do as I have done unto you." With that
greatest of all examples before us, what act, what office of human
kindness naturally laid upon us should we ever count too low, too
mean — should we shrink from, because of any idea that it would bo
a humiliating of ourselves before our fellow-men to undertake it ? It
is indeed an utter mistaking of this example to suppose that it calls
us to a repetition of the very act of Christ. Only if there be feet
needing to be washed, which the custom of the time and country
requires to be washed, while there is no one else upon whom the duty
properly devolves, only then does the example of Jesus call to a lit^
eral imitation of what he did. His own act stands before us, not a&
a model act to be exactly copied, but as an act representative to us
of the whole circle of kindly offices that we are called upon to render
to one another, and as illustrative of the humble, self-denying spirit
THE EXPOSUEE OF JUDAS. 611
in which all these offices should be discharged. You are all aware
that, on each returning Maundy-Thursday, the day before Easter,
the pope washes the feet of twelve poor men. A better comment has
never been made upon the act than the one made long ago by Ben
gel. "In our day," he says, "popes and princes imitate the feet-
washing to the letter, but a greater subject for admiration would be,
for instance, a pope in unaffected humility washing the feet of one
king, (his own equal in rank, and so the exact analogue to the disci-
ples' mutual washing of each other as brethren,) than the feet of
twelve paupers." So true were the Saviour's words that went to
indicate the difficulty which lay in a faithful following of the example
that he had just been setting : " If ye know these things, happy are
ye if ye do them." So easy is it to violate the spirit by sticking to
the letter of a precept; so easy for pride to take the form of humility.
XVI.
The Exposure of Judas.*
THUESDAY
The four evangelists agree in stating that it was upon a Sunday,
the day after the Jewish Sabbath, that our Lord rose from the grave,
and that it was on the day preceding this Sabbath that he was cru-
cified. They all assign the same events to the same days of the
week : the last supper to Thursday evening, the crucifixion to Friday,
the lying in the tomb to Saturday, the resurrection to Sunday. But
there is a marked discrepancy in the accounts of the three earlier
evangelists as compared with that of St. John, as to the relation of
these days of the week to the Jewish days of the month and of the
feast. If we had only the narratives of St. Matthew, St. Mark, and
St. Luke before us, we must at once have concluded that our Lord
partook of the passover supper at the same time with the Jews. Od
the other hand, if we had only the narrative of St. John before us,
we should as naturally have concluded that it was upon the evening
after the crucifixion, that the paschal supper was observed generally
by the Jews, and that Jesus must have antedated his observance of
it, partaking of it a day before the usual one, on the evening of the
thirteenth day of the month Nisan. The removal of this discrepancy
i* one of the most difficult problems with which harmonists of the
• Matt. 26 : 21-25 ; Mark 14 : 18-21 ; Luke 22 : 21-23 ; John 13 : 21-35.
612 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
gospels have had to deal, nor is there any single question touching
the chronology of our Saviour's life upon which more labor and learn-
ing have been bestowed. The success has not been equal to the
pains bestowed. The matter still remains in doubt. No doubt what
ever exists as to the fact that, whether he anticipated the ordinarj
time or not, it was that he might observe the Jewish passover with
his disciples, that our Lord, on the night of his betrayal, sat down
with his twelve apostles in the guest-chamber at Jerusalem.
In the paschal supper, as then observed, (and we cannot well ima-
gine that our Lord would deviate to any great degree from the cus-
tomary manner of its observance,) four, and on some occasions five
cups of wine were circulated among the guests, marking different
stages of the feast. When the company, which ordinarily was not
less than ten, nor more than twenty,* had assembled and ranged
themselves round the tables, the first cup of wine was filled, and the
head of the family (for we are to look upon this ordinance as essen-
tially a family gathering) pronounced a blessing on the feast and on
the cup, using the expression, " Praise be to thee, O Lord our God,
the King of the world, who hast created the fruit of the vine." After
the blessing, the cup was passed round, and the hands were washed.
The bitter herbs, dipped in vinegar, were then placed upon the table,
and a portion of them eaten in remembrance of the sorrows of the
Egyptian bondage. After this the other paschal dishes were brough t
in : the charoseth or sop, a liquid compounded of various fruits and
mingled with wine or vinegar, into which pieces of bread were dipped ;
the cake of unleavened bread ; and finally the roasted lamb, placed
before the head of the company. Then followed the questions and
explanations put and given in accordance with the instructions of
Moses: "And it shall come to pass, when your children shall say
unto you, What mean ye by this service ? that ye shall say, It is the
sacrifice of the Lord's passover, who passed over the houses of the
children of Israel in Egypt, when he smote the Egyptians, and deliv-
ered our houses." Exod. 12 : 26, 27. They sang then together the
first part of the Hallel or song of praise, embracing the one hundred
and thirteenth and one hundred and fourteenth psalms, and the sec-
ond cup of wine was drunk. Then began the feast proper: the
householder, taking two small loaves, breaking one of them in two,
laying the pieces upon the whole loaf, wrapping the whole in bitter
herbs, dipping it in the sop, and eating it, with the words, " This is
the bread of affliction which our fathers ate in Egypt." Next came
* It might be one hundred, if each could have a piece of the lamb as large aa
an olive.
THE EXPOSURE OF JUDAS. 613
the blessing upon each kind of food as it was partaken of, the pas-
chal lamb being eaten last, and the third cup, called the cup of bless-
ing, was drunk. The remainder of the Hallel, the psalms from the
one hundred and fifteenth to the one hundred and eighteenth, were
sung or chanted, with which the celebration ordinarily concluded.
Occasionally a fifth cup was added, and what was called the Great
Hallel (Psa. 120-137) was repeated.
It was after the strife and the feet-washing, and coincident with
the circulation of the first of these passover cups, that our Lord used
the words recorded in the fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, and eigh-
teenth verses of the twenty-second chapter of St. Luke : "And he said
unto them, With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you
before I suffer." Clear before the Saviour's eye were all the scenes
of the impending midnight hour in the garden, the next forenoon in
the jadgment-hall, the afternoon upon the cross. He stood touching
the very edge of these great sufferings. The baptism that he had to
be baptized with was now at hand — and how was he straitened till it
was accomplished ! — a few quiet hours lay between him and his en*
trance into the cloud. With a desire more earnest and vehement than
on any other occasion, he wished to spend those hours with his apos-
tles, to take his last leave of them, to give his farewell instructions to
them. He had never before partaken of the passover with them. He
desired to do it this once. He knew that it could never be repeated.
He knew that this was virtually the last Jewish passover : that with
the offering up of himself in the great sacrifice of the following day
that long line of passover celebrations that had run now through
fifteen hundred years, down from the night in Egypt when the first-
born were slain, was to be brought to its close. He knew that all
which this rite prefigured was then to be fulfilled, and that that ful-
filment was to issue in the erection of a spiritual kingdom, in which
other kind of ,tables were to be spread, and other kind of wine to be
drunk. " With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you
before I suffer : for I say unto you, I will not any more eat thereof,
until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. And he took the cup,
and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves :
for I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine until the
kingdom of God shall come." Emphatic here is the double repetition
of the words, " for I say unto you " — calling special attention to the
words that followed. Responding to this call, we fix our thoughts
upon these words; but beyond the intimation they contain of that
being our Lord's last passover, and of his speedy entering into an
estate altogether higher, yet in some respects alike, they remain
614 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
almost as mysterious to us as they must have been to those who
heard them for the first time at the supper- table.
In washing the disciples' feet, Jvjsus had said, "Ye are clean, but
not all. For he knew who should betray him ; therefore said he, Ye
are not all clean." John 13 : 10, 11. So early, from the very first,
did the thought of Judas and his meditated deed press upon the
Saviour's spirit. When the washing of the feet was over, and Jesus
sat down, and the repast began, they all noticed that there was a
cloud upon their Master's countenance, and the disciple who, sitting
next to him, could best read the expression of his face, saw that he
"was troubled in spirit." What was vexing him ? what was marring
the joy of such a meeting? They are not left long in doubt as to
the cause. Christ breaks the silence into which, in the sadness of
his spirit, he had fallen ; he speaks in tone and manner quite different
from those of his ordinary colloquial address. And he " testified and
said, Verily, verily I say unto you, that one of you which eateth with
me shall betray me!" Betray him! how? for what? to what? Be-
tray such a Master at such a time ! Bad enough for any common
disciple to use the means and opportunities that acquaintance gave
to effect his ruin; but for one of them, his own familiar friends, whom
he has drawn so closely round his person, upon whom he has lav-
ished such affection — for one of those admitted to this most sacred
of meals, the holiest seal of the nearest earthly bond ; for one of the
twelve to betray him ! No wonder, as the thought of all the guilt
which such an act involved sprung up within their breasts, that they
should be, as they were, "exceeding sorrowful;" that they should
look "one on another, doubting of whom he spake" — fixing search-
ing looks on all around, to see whether any countenance showed the
confusion of felt guilt, that, after inquiring among themselves which
of them it was that "should do this thing," they should begin, "every
one of them, to say unto him, one by one, Is it I ? and another, Is it
I?" You like the men that met such an announcement in such a
way. You like them for the burning sense of shame they show at
the very thought of there being one among them capable of such a
deed. You like them for the strong desire that each man shows to
clear himself from the charge. You like them for the prompt appeal
that each man makes to Jesus. Above all, you like them that there
is none so bold and over-confident, not even Peter, as at. once to tbink
and say of himself that there was no possibility it could be he, but
that all, not without some secret wonder and self-distrust, put in turn
the question, "Lord, is it I?" All but one ! He did not at first dare
to put this question to his Master. In the confusion, his having omit-
THE EXPOSURE OF JUDAS. 615
ted to do so, would not be noticed. He had returned look for look,
as they at first scanned each other; no face calmer or less confused;
nf one suspecting Judas.
To the many questions coming so eagerly from all sides and ends
of the table, Jesus made the general reply: "He that dippeth his
iiand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me." Had there
been but one vessel containing the paschal sauce into which all dip-
ped, this would have been nothing more than a repetition of the first
announcement that it was one of them now eating with him at the
same table that should betray him. But if, as we have every reason
to believe, there were more dishes than one upon the table, this sec-
ond saying of our Lord would limit the betrayal to that smaller circle
of which he was himself the centre — the three or four all of whom
dipped into the same vessel. Within that circle was Judas, who,
when he heard the terrible words that followed, "The Son of man
goeth as it is written of him, but woe unto that man by whom the
Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had
not been born," whether from the circle having been drawn so much
the narrower taking him in among the few, one of whom must be the
man, or from the look of his Master being fixed on him, the spell of
which he could not resist, or from the very burden and terror of a
denunciation which sent a thrill through every heart, could no longer
remain silent, but said to Jesus, as the others had done before, "Mas-
ter, is it I?" Jesus said unto him, "Thou hast said;" that is, "Yes,
thou art the man."
We have the express testimony of the fourth evangelist that no
man at the table but hirnself knew for what purpose Judas at last
went out, that none of them at this time suspected him as the be-
trayer. No man at the table then could have heard that answer of
our Lord; a thing that we can scarcely imagine how it could be, but
by supposing that Judas lay upon the seat immediately next to Jesus
on the one side, as John lay upon the one nearest to him on the
other. Assuming this, Jesus might easily have spoken to one so near
in such an undertone that none could overhear.
Let us imagine now, that close to Judas, on the same side, or one
or two off from John, upon the other side, Peter was sitting, and the
last incident in the strange story becomes intelligible. None have
heard our Saviour's specific designation of the traitor to himself. The
terrible malediction, however, pronounced upon him has whetted
their curiosity to know who he is. Peter sees that John is the most
likely one to find it out. If the Master will tell it to any one, it will
be to him, he couching so close to Jesus that he has only to throw
616 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
back his head for it to rest upon his Master's bosom. Into his ear,
therefore, any secret may be easily and safely whispered. As Peter
is so placed that he cannot well do it otherwise without his object
revealing itself, by signs rather than by words he tells John to ask
John does so, and gets an answer that was specific and unambiguous ;
one, however, that no one at table but himself could have had any
knowledge of. "He it is," said Jesus, "to whom I shall give a sop,
when I have dipped it." And when he had dipped the sop, he gave
it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon. Two men of the twelve now
knew to whom the Lord referred — Judas, on the one side, to whom
Jesus had directly said, "Thou art the man," and John, now, on the
other, to whom the sign was as explicit as any words could be — a
sign, however, only to John himself, the others not having heard the
words that gave the act its meaning. The giving of the sop to him
decided the course of the betrayer. " That thou doest," said Jesus
to him, "do quickly." He arose and went out immediately; and it
was night. And into that night he went carrying a blacker night
within his own dark breast. And now, how are we to interpret this
striking passage in the history of our Lord ?
1. This exposure and denunciation of the traitor may have been
one of the needful steps in the accomplishment of the divine designs,
Judas had already made a compact with the chief priests to delivei
Jesus into their hands. But of the time and manner of that deliver-
ance nothing had been said. As to these, nothing had been resolved
on. We may well believe that Judas entered the guest-chamber
without any premeditated purpose of executing his design that night.
The discovery, however, that his Master already knew all that he
had done, all that he meant to do, the judgment passed, the terrible
woe denounced on him, instead of checking him in his career, served
but to spur him on, and form within him, and fix the purpose to go
and do that very night the thing he had engaged to do. Operating
in this way, what was said and done by Jesus may have contributed
to the accomplishment within the appointed time of the predeter-
mined counsel and purpose of the Most High.
2. We have Christ's own authority for saying that one of his
reasons for acting as he did towards Judas was to afford to the
other apostles an evidence of his Messiahship. "I speak not of you
all," he had said; "I know whom I have chosen: but that the Scrip-
ture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up
his heel against me. Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is
come to pass, ye may believe that I am he." Had nothing been
said beforehand by Jesus, had everything run the course it did,
THE EXPOSUKE OF JUDAS. 617
their Master remaining apparently in profound ignorance of bow his
arrest in the garden was to be brought about, then to the apostles'
eyes this mystery would have hung around the whole procedure : that
Tesus had been deceived, had suffered a traitor to enter unknown
tnd undetected into the innermost circle of his friends, had fallen
by an unexpected blow from the hand of one fancied to be friendly,
As it was, what a proof had the apostle set before their eyes, that
Jesus knew what was in man, and needed not that any one should
tell him what was in man. None of them had distrusted Judas.
He could have given no patent proof of his falseheartedness. He
had kept up the appearance of true friendship to the last, so as to
deceive every other eye. Yet when all is over, and they recall what
their Master had said a year before his death, that one of them was
a devil, and remember especially the sayings of the guest-chamber,
how vividly would the conviction come home to the minds of the
apostles, that they had to do with one from whom no secrets were
hidden, before whose all-seeing eye every heart lay naked and bare !
3. Let us see here an exhibition of the humanity of Jesus, his
being truly one of us, with all the common sensibility of our nature,
moral and emotional. There is nothing that the human heart so
shrinks from and shudders at as treachery in a friend; the wearing
of a mask, the acceptance of all the tokens and pledges of affection,
fhe profession of admiration, attachment, love, yet deep within cold-
ness, sullenness, selfishness, a waiting for and seeking for oppor-
tunity to make gain of the cultivated friendship, and a readiness,
when the time comes, to sacrifice the friend on the altar of pride, or
covetousness, or ambition. And if Jesus resented the hypocrisy and
treachery of Judas, if his spirit recoiled from near contact with the
traitor, if when these last hours had come which he wished to spend
alone with those he had loved so well and was loving now, if that
could be, better than ever the nearer the hour of his departure
came — he felt as if that guest-chamber were defiled by such a pres-
ence as that of Judas, and felt burdened and restrained till he was
gone, what is this but saying that there beat in him the same heart
that beats in all of us, when that heart is right within? One object
of the Saviour in so soon introducing the topic of his betrayal may
have been to get rid of a presence felt to be incongruous, felt to be
a restraint. He had much to say that was for the ear of friendship
alone. He had to open up his heart in a way that no one would
*^-j>k to do before the cold and the unsympathizing, much less before
the alienated and the hostile. It may have been with the feeling
that the sooner he was gone the better, that Jesus said to Judas,
618 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
"What thou doest, do quickly." One thing at least is evident, that
it was with a burst of elation and joy, as one escaping from under
a dull and heavy pressure that crushed the spirit into sadness, that
Jesus spoke to the others instantly on Judas being gone. "There-
fore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man
glorified, and God is glorified in him. If God be glorified in him,
God shall also glorify him in himself, and shall straightway glorify
him. Little children, yet a little while I am with you," and so on
throughout all the remainder of the feast he speaks and acts with a
free unburdened heart.
4. There is more than the humanity here; there is the divinity
of our Lord. He assumes and exercises the office of the Judge.
He is a God to Judas. He takes this man into his hands, and deals
with him as none but God had a right to do. I speak not of that
knowledge which laid bare to him all that he had in his heart to do,
but of his dooming him as he did; his pronouncing over him the
most terrible sentence that was ever pronounced over a human
being on this side eternity: "Woe to that man; it had been good
for that man if he had not been born !" That there was tender-
ness and pity, infinite pity and infinite tenderness in the heart of
Jesus for Judas, who can doubt ? That in dealing with him as he
did in the guest-chamber, he was giving him another and last oppor-
tunity of repentance I do most thoroughly believe. What way could
you take more fitted to turn any man from a crime that you knew he
meditated, than the telling him beforehand that you knew all that
he intended and had planned to do, and by denouncing the crime
contemplated in the strongest terms you could employ? That a
purpose of mercy lay embedded in our Lord's treatment of Judas is
not disproved by the fact, that instead of working anything like
repentance, it stirred up the malicious feelings to an intenser activity.
That fact, like the thousand others of like kind that are daily, hourly
happening in God's moral government of our race, only shows that
the very goodness and grace of the Most High, the wisdom, purity,
and holiness of his law, are too often turned by the perverse spirit
that is in us into incitements to a bolder and more determined
resistance to his authority. The case of Judas, in this stage of it,
is but another instance of what is a very common experience, that if
a man have once fairly committed himself to a certain course, have
resolved to brave all its perils in order to realize its fancied gains,
be becomes so self-blinded, so impetuous, so impatient of all check
or hinderance, that anything whatever thrown in his way, however
fitted in itself to warn and check, becomes but as a goad in the side
PETEE'S PROFESSIONS. 619
of a fiery steed, driving him the more fiercely on his career. But is
it over one whom mercy and love have followed to the farthest limits,
and have been obliged at last to let go, that the fearful sentence is
pronounced : " Woe to that man ; it had been better for him that he
had not been born!" Does he who says that know it to be true?
He can know it only by his being one with God. Has he who pro-
nounces this doom a title to do so ? He can have it only by challen-
ging to himself the prerogatives of the supreme Judge of all mankind.
5. Let us look on with wonder and awe as there is opened here
to our view in one of its depths, the great mystery of this world and
of God's wise and holy government of it. "It had been better for
that man that he had not been" — but why then was he born? A
great crime is made to minister to the greatest act and instance of
the divine love, yet the criminal is stripped of no part of his guilt.
"The Son of man goeth as it is written;" that writing is but the
expression of the divine will; that will is sovereign, just, and good;
yet woe to the man by whom the Son of man is betrayed ! human
freedom, human agency, human guilt taken up into that vast and
complicated machinery by which the counsels of the Most High
God are carried out. "Oh the depth of the riches, both of the wis-
dom and knowledge of God ! how unsearchable are his judgments^
and his ways past finding out!" "Thou wilt say unto me, Why
doth he yet find fault ? for who hath resisted his will ? Nay but, O
man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing
formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus ?
For who hath known the mind of the Lord, or who hath been his
counsellor ? For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things,
to whom be glory for ever. Amen."
After Judas left the room, our Lord said, " Little children, yet a
little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me: and as I said unto
the Jews, Whither I go, ye cannot come ; so say I now to you."
The words struck upon Peter's ear, and set his quick spirit working.
Another intimation this of some mysterious movement about to be
made. Keeping the words before him, so soon as a convenient
pause occurred, Peter said unto Jesus, "Lord, whither goest thou?
Jesus answered him, Whither I go, thou canst not follow me now ;
but thou shalt follow me afterwards." The answer should have
satisfied him — should have repressed at least the curiosity which it
was obviously not Christ's purpose to satisfy. But the pertinacious
apostle will not accept the mild rebuke that it contains; he will still
go on, be still more urgent. He had already got one check at the
feet-washing, from which it cost him little to recover. He may have
620 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
been somewhat tremulous when with the rest he put the question to
Jesus, "Lord, is it I?" But he has recovered himself, and is ready-
now to say almost anything to his Master, almost anything of him-
self. "Lord," he replies, "why cannot I follow thee now? I will lay
down my life for thy sake." Let us do Peter the justice to believe
that this was not altogether a vain and empty boast ; let us believe
fchat if his Master's life had been threatened by open violence he
would have stood by him to the last, and perilled or lost his own
life in his defence. He was one of the two who, strangely enough,
perhaps suspecting something from the temper of the rulers, had
brought a sword with him into the guest-chamber. And he proved
in the garden that he was ready to meet the risks that the use of
that weapon brought with it. It was in another kind of courage
than the physical one that he was to prove himself so bankrupt.
Still there was no small measure of presumption in his being so free
with the expression of his readiness to lay down his life, a presump-
tion which Jesus met by saying first, with gentle irony, " Wilt thou
lay down thy life for my sake?" and then adding, "Verily, verily, I
say unto thee, The cock shall not crow" (the time of the cock-crow-
ing, a division of the Jewish night, shall not pass), "till thou hast
denied me thrice."
The feast goes on. Some unrecorded observation has been
made by Peter in the name of the others as well as of himself, when
our Lord turns to him and says, " Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath
desired to have you;" to have you all, (the word here used took in
the others as well as Peter,) "that he might sift you as wheat; but
I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not : and when thou art
converted, strengthen thy brethren" — another and most impressive
warning which should have sent his thoughts into another channel,
but he is back again to his first position. Jesus had said nothing
open of any peril to himself, but the apostle cannot get it out of his
thoughts. "Lord," he says, "I am ready to go with thee to prison
and to death." He gets in answer the same distinct prediction, that
before the dawn he should thrice deny his Lord.
The feast is over. They are on the way out to Gethsemane,
when Jesus says to the group around him, " All ye shall be offended
because of me this night : for it is written, I will smite the Shepherd,
and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered." There was nothing
to call for Peter's intervention here. But he cannot be silent; he
must step forward and put himself above all the others. "Though
all shall be offended because of thee, yet will I never be offended."
Once more, for the third time, the prediction of his three denials is
-.
PETER'S PROFESSIONS. 621
rung in his ears, but with no effect. "But he spake the more vehe-
mently, If I should die with thee, I will not deny thee. Likewise
also said they all." Yet within an hour they all had fled, and within
three hours the three denials had taken place. How are we to
look upon so singular a display of such sustained, reiterated, most
obstinate, and boastful self-confidence ? Something we must attrib
ute to the excitement of the occasion, but more to the natural temper
of the man. The last few days had been swelling the tide of Pharisaic
indignation as it rose around Jesus in the temple, till its proudest,
darkest waves seemed ready to burst upon and swallow him up.
New and strange impressions of some great impending calamity,
which all their Master's words and actions deepened, seized upon
the apostles. There were some quiet hours for him and them in the
guest-chamber; but calm as he was, there was a mournfulness in
their Master's calmness, as if he sat under the shadow of some
terrible catastrophe, and such a constant throwing out of hints as
to its approach, that one can well believe that the spirits of the
apostles were wrought up to a high pitch of excitement, so that
whatever each man had in him of weakness or of strength, was just
in the condition to come out in all its fulness; and so in all its
fulness came out that rash, presumptuous, overtrustfulness in self, in
which lay Peter's peculiar weakness.
But something, too, we must attribute to another agency, which
took advantage of all the excitement of the occasion, and wrought
upon the temper of the man. I have already spoken of the evidence
which, within the walls of this supper-chamber, Jesus gave of his
eye being one that could see into the future of earthly events. But
now the proof meets us of that eye being one that pierces beyond
the bounds of the outward and earthly, scans the secrets of the world
of spirits, and sees all that is there going on. It is but a glimpse he
gives us of what he knew and saw; but how strange, how awful,
how full of warning, how full of encouragement, that glimpse !
Looking at the scene in the supper-chamber with the eye of sense,
you see twelve men with their Master at their head, in trying,
startling circumstances ; first one and then another acting out their
natural dispositions and characters. Looking with the eye of faith
as Jesus lifts the veil, you see Satan tempting, Jesus praying, the
Father hearing, the sifting suffered, the son of perdition lost, the
boastful disciple tried, his fall permitted, the invisible shield held
over him — his faith not suffered wholly to fail, his very fall turned
to good account, and he by it made all the fitter to be a comforter
and strengthener of others.
622 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
Such was the first communion-table : around it the play of these
spiritual agencies; by the men who sat at it the exhibitions of
such weakness, presumption, guilt — one betraying, one denying, all
forsaking. With such a spectacle before our eyes let us not be
high-minded, but fear. We come to our tables of communion with
the same weak nature that was in Judas, and Peter, and the rest;
and Satan may be ready to enter into our heart and may be desirous
to have us that he may sift us as wheat. The nearer we stand to
Jesus, the greater his efforts to throw the snare around our feet bj
which our fall may be effected. Let the self-ignorance and want of
faith and failure in attachment that all the twelve showed that night
shine as a beacon before our eyes, and under a trembling sense of
our own weakness and liability to forsake or deny, or even to betray
our Master, let us cast ourselves upon him, that for us, too, he may
pray the Father, that in the coming hours of trial our faith fail not,
but that through all of temptation and danger that yet awaits us
in this world we may be safely borne, through the might of his
strengthening presence, and to the praise of his great name.
XVII.
The Lord's (Supper.*
THURSDAY.
Let us imagine that one previously ignorant of the history of
our religion were to set himself, in the first instance, to investigate
the origin of the institution of the Lord's Supper. The fact that
the entire Christian church, however its various sections may other-
wise differ, all agree in observing this rite, is before his eyes, and he
finds upon inquiry that it has done so for many generations past.
Guided simply by the lights of common history, he ascertains that
as far back as till about one hundred and thirty years after the
time when Christ is said to have lived, there was a society calling
itself by his name, in which this ordinance was kept. There is then
put into his hand a copy of the New Testament, in which an account
of its first institution is given. He finds in this book, however, so
much that is extraordinary, that he is disposed at first to be incred-
ulous — incredulous, among other things, as to this account. Might
not this rite have taken its rise somewhat differently, at some after
* Matt. 26 : 26-29 ; Mark U : 22-25 ; Luke 22 : 19, 20 ; 1 Cor. 11 : 2a-25.
THE LORD'S SUPPER. 623
period, the narrative contrived and adapted by those who wished to
bestow upon it as interesting a birth as possible ? A slight reflection
resolves this difficulty. How could the men of any after period, say
fifty or a hundred years after the death of Christ, begin then for the
first time to keep a rite which bore upon the very front of it that it
was kept in obedience to a command of the Saviour given on the
night before he died? Had this command not been given at that
time, and had the observance not at that time commenced, one can-
not see how, without a falsehood in their hands which they could
not but detect, any body of men could at any posterior period have
commenced the celebration. Besides, it is expressly asserted in the
Acts of the Apostles that the first disciples of Jesus did actually
begin the breaking of bread in remembrance of their Master a few
days after the resurrection, and continued it weekly thereafter. How
could a record containing such a statement have been at any subse-
quent time foisted upon the faith of those who had never before
seen or heard of such an ordinance? It would have been utterly
impossible to have gained credit for a narrative containing such a
statement, had the statement not in point of fact been true.
Simply and by itself, therefore, the continuous observance of this
sacred ordinance carries with it a separate and independent proof
that it must have commenced at the time specified in the gospel
narrative. Assuming, then, that narrative as authentic, as being a
trustworthy account of what was said and done by Jesus Christ
within the chamber where he assembled with the twelve, what might
such an inquirer as we have imagined gather from that narrative
alone, and without going beyond its limits, as to the character of
Christ?
1. Would he not be struck with the manifold evidence given
within the compass of these few hours of the prescience of Jesus, his
minute foreknowledge of the future ? All throughout he speaks and
acts as one who knew that this was to be his parting interview with
the men around him, his last meeting with them before his death.
He knew that his hour was come, that he should depart out of this
world unto the Father. He spoke of that departure as at hand.
Externally there was nothing to indicate that his death was so near,
that his body was so soon to be broken, his blood to be shed. Such
private information might have been conveyed to him as to the
plans and purposes of the rulers, and of the compact of the betrayeT
with them, as to satisfy him that the earliest opportunity would be
taken to cut him off. A presentiment that his end was near might
thus have been created, but such a presentiment could not have
624 THE LIFE OF CHRIS1.
exhibited the clearness and the certainty of that conviction upon
which he acted. Besides, it was not his own future alone which was
mapped out so distinctly before his eye. It was the future, near and
remote, of every man around him. He tells Judas beforehand that
he was to betray him, Peter that he was to deny him, the whole of
them that they were that night to be offended at him and forsake
him, that he was to be left alone. Looking still farther on, he dimly
intimates to Peter that in his death he was to resemble his Master,
and distinctly tells the rest that for a little while they should be sor-
rowful, but that their sorrow should be turned into joy; that the time
was coming when they should be put out of the synagogues, and that
whosoever killed them should think that he did God service. Three
times in the course of his addresses, while pre-announcing one or
another of these events, he emphatically declares that he told them
these things beforehand, that when all came to pass they might re-
member that he had told them, and believe that he was the Messiah
promised to their fathers. Pondering over the form and manner of
the evidence thus afforded of Christ's prescience, might not our in-
quirer say, Surely a greater than any of the old prophets is here !
Their knowledge of the future was derived from another, was com-
municated as so derived. It was as the Lord revealed that they
declared and described. To their eye there was so much light upon
the future as God was pleased to throw upon it, but all around was
darkness. They never assumed, and they never exercised, a power
of foreknowing and foretelling in their own name, and without any
limits. But here is one upon whom the power sits easily, as a natu-
ral inherent gift, who exercises it without token of its being in any
way limited, without any recognition of his indebtedness to another
for the foresight he displays.
2. Opening his mind and heart to the first impressions of the
scene, our inquirer could not fail to be greatly struck with the strong
considerate affection shown by Jesus to his disciples. There hangs
around the incidents and sayings of the upper chamber the touching
and tender interest which attaches to the last words and acts of the
dying. When a man knows that he is speaking to his family or
friends around him for the last time, that it is his last opportunity of
addressing to them words of counsel and encouragement, what a
solemnity attaches to the interview S And if he be a man of ardent
ftffections, what love and sympathy will breathe out in his parting
words ! The world of common life is not void of instances in which
men so placed have risen to a heroic height of self -forge tfulness, and
have spent their last moments in the effort to comfort and strengthen
k.
THE LORD'S SUPPER. 625
those they left behind. There is much, however, to distinguish this
instance of a parting farewell from all others of a like kind. It is
given to no man to foresee his impending sufferings, and the exact
manner of his death, as Jesus foresaw them; nor is it given to any
to foresee, as he did, all the after trials of those from whom he was
to part. He knows, as he is speaking to the twelve in the guest-
chamber, that within an hour or two he shall be lying in the great
agony of the garden ; that he shall never close his eyes again till he
closes them in death ; that to-morrow there await him all the moi ke-
ries of the judgment-hall, all the shame and suffering of the cruss;
that the shades of the next day shall darken round his sepulchre.
But the prospect of all this, though so near, so vividly seen, ao iw-
fully dark, has not power to withdraw his thoughts from his discir. les,
or keep him from bestowing upon them those last hours given for
earthly intercourse. As he speaks to them his whole heart serins
absorbed with the one desire, to soothe, to comfort, to warn, to for-
tify, to encourage. If he speak of his own departure, it is as if the
thing about it that grieved him most was, that they should be left
exposed to so many difficulties and trials when he was gone. Their
very ignorance of what was awaiting them quickens his compassion
and gives deeper pathos to his words. As he looks round upon the
little flock so soon to be scattered as sheep without a shepherd, the
coming history of each rises before his eye. There is James, who sc
soon is to seal his testimony with his blood; Peter, who, like his
Lord, is to be crucified; John, who is to be left survivor of them all.
How little do these men know the kind of life that is before thorn !
How shall he best prepare them for it? The very frailties and faults
that he knew they were to exhibit seem but to have added to the
gentleness and tenderness of his love. How else shall we account
for the manner in which he speaks of them and to them upon this
occasion? Of them, to his Father: "Thine they were, and thou
gavest them me, and they have kept thy word ; they have known
surely that I came out from thee, they have believed that thou didst
send me." To themselves : " Ye are they which have continued with
me in my temptations. And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my
Father hath appointed unto me." To speak in such a way as this of
men who at the time knew so little of the real character of their
Master, and bad so little faith; to speak thus of the very men who,
instead of continuing with him, were all that very night to forsake
him, what shall we say of it but that there was the very rarest exhi-
bition here of that charity which believeth all things, thinketh no
evil, hopeth all things; which, wherever faith, though it be but as a
*4<* nf Obrlrt 40
626 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
grain of musi ard-seed, is genuine; wherever devotion, though it be
weak, is true — is ready to acknowledge and approve ?
3. After being struck generally with the singular manifestations
of a deep-rooted self-forgetting attachment to the twelve shown by
Jesus all through this interview, we may imagine the attention of out
supposed inquirer to be concentrated upon that act by which ho
instituted an observance to be kept for ever after in remembrance of
him. As the author of a great religious revolution, the head of a
great religious society, it is remarkable that this is the one religious
ceremony instituted and observed by our Lord himself. After his
death and resurrection, he issued the command that, on being enrolled
as his followers, all were to be baptized ; but this meeting together,
this breaking of bread and drinking of wine in remembrance of
him, was the single ordinance that in his lifetime he set up, and by
his own first observance hallowed. Is there anything peculiar in his
having done so? There is nothing peculiar certainly in the cherish-
ing and expressing a desire to be remembered when we are gone by
those we loved ; nothing peculiar in our leaving behind some remem-
brancers by which our memory may be kept green and fresh within
their hearts. But there is something more here than the expression
of such a desire, the bequeathing of such a remembrancer. There
is the appointment of a particular mode by which for ever after-
wards the remembrance of Christ, and more particularly of his death
for them, was to be sustained in the breasts of all his followers. It
is common enough in human history to meet with periodical celebra-
tions, anniversaries of the day of their birth, or of their death, held
in honor of those who have greatly distinguished themselves by their
virtues, their genius, their high services to their country or to man-
kind. But where except here have we read of any one in his own
lifetime originating and appointing the method by which he was to
be remembered, himself presiding at the first celebration of the rite,
and laying as his injunction upon all his followers, regularly to meet
for its observance? Who among all those who have been the great-
est ornaments of our race, the greatest benefactors of humanity,
would ever have risked his reputation, his prospect of being remem-
bered by the ages that were to come, by exhibiting such an eagei
and premature desire to preserve and perpetuate the remembrance
of his name, his character, his deeds? They have left it to other?
after them to devise the means for doing so; neither vain enough
nor bold enough, nor foolish enough to be themselves the framers of
these means. Who then is he who ventures to do what none else
ever did? Who is this who, ere he dies, by his own act and deed
THE LOED'S SUPPER. 627
sets up the memorial institution by which his death is to be shown
forth? Surely he must be one who knows and feels that he has
claims to be remembered such as none other ever had — claims of
such a kind that, in pressing them in such a way upon the notice of
his followers, he has no fear whatever of what he does being attrib-
uted to any other, any lesser motive than the purest, deepest, most
unselfish love ? Does not Jesus Christ in the very act of instituting
in his own lifetime this memorial rite, step at once above the level
of ordinary humanity, and assert for himself a position toward man-
kind utterj^ and absolutely unique?
And if, by the mere fact of Jesus Christ having erected with his
own hand the institute by which his name and memory were to be
kept alive, the impression might thus, and naturally enough, have
been conveyed into the mind of our supposed inquirer, of there
being something superhuman about him, would not this impression
be sustained and enhanced as he ran his eye over the words which,
on this occasion, Christ was represented as having addressed to his
disciples? Something surely quite original, belonging to himself
alone, was the way in which he spoke of his relationship to his own
disciples, to all mankind, to the Divine Being whom he called his
Father. To his own disciples you hear him saying, "I am the vine,
ye are the branches." "Abide in me and I in you." "Without me
ye can do nothing." "Because I live, ye shall live also." "If ye
shall ask anything in my name, I will do it." As to all men you
hear him sayings "I am the way, and the truth, and the life : no man
cometh unto the Father, but by me." And as to God, "He that hath
seen me, hath seen the Father." "Ye believe in God, believe also in
me." "And this is life eternal, to know thee, the only true God, and
Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. I have glorified thee on the
earth : I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. And
now, G Father, glorify thou me, with the glory which I had with thee
befoie the world was." "All mine are thine, and thine are mine."
"Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me
where I am ; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given
me : for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world." Gut
of those few hours which Jesus spent with the twelve within the walls
of the guest-chamber at Jerusalem, from what he did there, and
what he said, how much would there be to awaken in the spirit of
such an inquirer as we have imagined, the most intense curiosity as
to the real character of him who appears as president in this pass*
over celebration ; how much to carry the conviction home either that
lie was a vain presumptuous egotist, taking a place among his fellows
628 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
and before God to which he had no right, or he was other than an
ordinary child of Adam, one who stood in quite a different position
both to God and to man from that which any one before, or any one
since in the history of our race has occupied.
With these remarks upon the general impressions which a first
reading of the narrative of all that happened in the guest-chamber
might be supposed to make on the mind of an intelligent and candid
reader, let us look with our own eyes at the different accounts which
have been transmitted to us of the institution of the Lord's Supper.
They are four in number. The one first written and published was
that of St. Paul, remarkable not only as coming from one who was
not an eye-witness, but who received it by immediate revelation from
our Lord himself. Springing from such a peculiar and independent
source, its concurrence with those of the three evangelists is striking
and satisfactory; for all the four accounts do thoroughly and sub-
stantially agree. There are indeed many verbal differences between
them. No two of the narrators put exactly the same words in
Christ's lips. We might have expected that if any words of our
Lord were to be reported with exact and literal fidelity, they would
have been those uttered by him on this occasion. That it is not so
is one of the many proofs that it was the general meaning and sub-
stance of what Christ said, rather than the exact expressions which
he employed, that the sacred writers were instructed to preserve.
Three of the four accounts agree in telling us that there was a double
blessing or giving of thanks, the first at the breaking of the bread,
the second at the giving of the cup. But no record whatever is
preserved of the words in which these benedictions or prayers were
couched ; a silence, not perhaps without reason, considering that it
is in and by the consecration prayer of the priest, regarded as cor-
responding to these benedictions, that the mysterious change in the
elements is by some supposed to be effected. Two of the four ac-
counts agree in telling us that there was an interval — how occupied
is not told — between the two acts, that of breaking the bread and
handing round the cup ; the one taking place while the Supper was
in progress, the other not till it was ended. Two also of the four
accounts agree in telling us that it was as they were eating, that is 5
partaking in the ordinary way of the Paschal supper, that the bread
of the new Christian rite was blessed and broken.
It is not possible, indeed, with the broken and imperfect lights
that we have here in hand, to have anything like a distinct concep-
tion of the exact order of events. It is, however, almost certain,
that it was after the paschal lamb was eaten, and towards the close
THE LORD'S SUPPER. 629
therefore of the Jewish ordinance, that Christ either interrupted the
ordinary course of the feast, or turned that which had been the final
distribution of a portion of the unleavened bread to a new and pecu-
liar use. Anyhow, we may well believe that there was something in
oui Lord's manner when he took the loaf in hand and lifted up his
roice in prayer, and blessed and brake, that closed every lip and fixed
on him every eye. The wonder heightened when he said, " Take,
eat; this is my body which is broken for you: this do in remem-
brance of me." It may have been, we presume it was, a silent inter-
val which occurred, till the time came for the last cup of the feast, of
the cup of blessing, to be handed round. Having blessed it also,
he gave it to them, saying, "Drink ye all of it: for this is my blood
of the new testament which is shed for many for the remission of
sins."
How, then, we ask ourselves, after having studied as minutely as
we can all that has been told us of the first observance of this ordi-
nance, how, at what times, and in what manner, did our Lord intend
that it should be celebrated in his church ? The first disciples, the
apostles themselves, had to put the same question, and we know
something of the way in which they answered it. They could not,
of course, connect it any more, as Christ had done, with the paschal
supper, but, following so far, as they thought, their Lord's example,
they did connect it with a social meal ; and so full of love were they,
so anxious to have the memory of their risen Saviour ever before
them, they continued daily breaking the bread from house to house.
The associating, however, of the religious rite with a common supper
led speedily to abuse. The secular and the social vitiated the spirit-
ual, till, in such a case as that which occurred at Corinth, all the
sacredness and awe and tender love with which the bread of this
ordinance had at first been broken, were lost amid the tumult of a
riotous entertainment, in which some ate as the hungry eat, and in
which others were drunken. The strong hand of St. Paul was put
forth to check so glaring an outrage on ail the decencies of Christian
worship. Under his rebuke the churches began to discountenance
the practice which had opened the door to this abuse. The social
meal, under the name of Agape, or love-feast, was dissociated alto-
gether from the religious observance. The Lord's Supper ceased to
be a supper. It was celebrated in the morning or mid-da}% and not
in the evening. The daily changed into the weekly observance, where
it long stood ; the weekly into the monthly, where it still stands in
many churches ; the monthly, in some cases, into the yearly, as was
long the custom in our own country.
630 TIIE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Does not all this teach us how free in this matter the church has
been left by its great Founder — how little he cared about the form
as compared with the spirit in which the memory of his dying love
was to be preserved and perpetuated? As to time, and place, and
order, and outward circumstance, he left all loose. He framed no
directory ; he did not even leave behind any example that could be
exactly copied. It has been so ordered, both as to the original words
and actions of our Lord, and the accounts that we have of them, that
all attempts to reenact, as it were, the scene in the guest-chamber are
futile and vain.
Two things, indeed, appear to be essential to a right conception
of it. First, that in some way or other we recognise this ordinance
as a social meeting. It is by sitting down at one table, and parta-
king together of the food spread thereon, that the ties of brotherhood
and friendship are, in common life, expressed and maintained. And
that true believers are without distinction and on equal terms, invited
to sit down at the tables of the Christian communion, to be partakers
of that one bread — is not this designed to teach them that they form
one body, one brotherhood, all whose members should be bound to-
gether by the spirit of love and sympathy, and readiness to bear
each other's burdens, and to give each other help? The existing
state of matters in our large Christian societies, when so many who
know nothing of one another associate in this holy ordinance, stands
in the way of this being realized. Nevertheless, it ought ever to
be regarded as one part of its intention, to impress upon us the
unity of the Christian brotherhood, their oneness with one another,
and the duties of universal charity which this unity, this oneness,
involves.
Still more striking, however, and still more important is it, to
notice what the source, and bond, and seal of this union of all true
Christians with one another is, as symbolized and represented in this
chief rite of our religion. Christ would unite us to one another by
bringing us to the same table, and dividing out to us the same bread
and wine. But that bread and wine, what are they ? His own body,
his own blood; we have no true union with each other, but by and
through such a union with himself as is represented by the image —
almost too strong, we might think, and somewhat rude and harsh, yet
one of the aptest that could be used — of our taking him and feeding
upon him — eating his flesh and drinking his blood.
OETHSEMANE. 631
xvni.
Gethsemane.*
THURSDAY.
The paschal celebration over, and his own supper instituted,
Jesus and his disciples united in singing a hymn. We should like to
have been told exactly what the words were, in singing which the
voices of Jesus and the eleven blended. If, as there is much reason
to believe, they were those of the one hundred and fifteenth, one hun-
dred and sixteenth, one hundred and seventeenth, and one hundred
and eighteenth psalms, with what singular emotion must our Lord
have repeated the verses : " The sorrows of death compassed me, and
the pains of hell gat hold upon me: I found trouble and sorrow.
Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints. The
Lord is on my side; I will not fear: what can man do unto me?
The stone which the builders refused is become the headstone of the
corner."
The hymn having been sung, and the words recorded in the four-
teenth chapter of the gospel of St. John having been spoken, Jesus
said to his disciples, " Arise, let us go hence." At his command they
rise and are ready to follow him. But he does not immediately go
forth. It grieves him to break up the interview. He will prolong it
to the uttermost ; give to them the last moments that can be spared.
As they cluster round him, he continues his address. At last it closes
with these comforting words : " These things have I spoken unto you,
that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribula-
tion: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world." So ended
that discourse, which, spoken originally to a small and undistin-
guished company in a rude upper chamber at Jerusalem, has already
won lor itself an audience vaster and more varied than ever listened
to tne words of any other speaker upon earth, and which has ren-
dered but a small part of the wide service of instruction and comfort
which it is destined to discharge to the sinful and sorrowful children
of our race.
Our Lord's last act of intercourse with his own in the upper
chamber was to bear them upon the arms of faith before his Father,
in the offering of that sublime intercessory prayer which he has left
behind him as a specimen of the advocacy which, as their great High
Priest* he conducts for his people before the throne.
* Matt, 26 : 36-4G ; Mark 14 : 32 42 ; Luke 22 : 39-46.
632 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
From the room rendered so sacred by all that had been said and
done in it, Jesus and the eleven at last depart. It vas near mid-
night, but the full moon lighted them on their way. They passed
out of one of the city gates, descended into the valley of Jehosha-
phat, crossed the Kedron, and made their way to the garden of Getb-
semane,* the well-known retreat where Jesus had often lately spent
the night; consecrating beforehand the scene of his great agony by
seasons of solitary prayer. At the entrance to this garden Jesus
said to his disciples generally, " Sit ye here, while I go and pray yon-
der." There was nothing strange in his desiring to be alone.. He
had often before severed himself in like manner from the twelve.
But there was something singular in it — showing that he was looking
forward to something more than an ordinary night of solitary rest or
prayer — -when, instructing the others to remain where they were, he
took Peter, and James, and John along with him farther into the
interior of the garden. They had been the three chosen and honored
witnesses of his transfiguration on the mount. Was it to behold
some new display of his power and glory that they were taken now
again apart ? Was the Father about to answer the petition so lately
offered, and in their presence to glorify his Son ? Were they again
to gaze upon their Master clothed in light, shining all over with a
brightness that would throw the moonlight which bathed them into
shadow? Wondering what was to come, Peter, James, and John
follow their Master as he leads them into the recesses of Gethsem-
ane, towards some spot perhaps which overhanging olive-branches
or the swelling hillside shaded, intercepting the moonbeams. Ere
they reach that spot he turns to speak to them. There is a great
change upon his countenance, but it is into gloom, not into glory.
He looks as one "sore amazed and very heavy," upon whose spirit
the horror of some great darkness, the pressure of some great bur-
den, has fallen. He speaks, but the calmness and serenity which
had breathed in every tone of his voice are gone. " My soul," he
says to them, " is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death." Strange
aspect for their Master to wear; strange words for him to speak!
They had never seen that countenance so overshadowed. They had
never heard him utter such mournful language. What can it be that
has wrought so sudden a change ? What deep trouble of the soul is
* However ready to do so, we could not, when in its neighborhood, persuade
ourselves that the traditional is the real Gethsemane. It is too close to the city
and too near a road which, at least in passover times, must have been a very
public thoroughfare. Higher up the valley of Jehoshaphat there is a recess in
the western slope of Mount Olivet which seemed to us much more likely fcc
have been the scene of our Lord's agony.
GETHSEMANE. 633
it that vents itself in these words ? Peter perhaps might have put
some question to his # Master, but the time is not given him. "Tarry
ye here," Christ adds, "and watch with me." Leaving them in their
turn amazed, he withdraws from them about a stone-cast, (forty or
fifty yards,) not so far off but that they can see, and even hear him.
He reaches the shaded spot, he kneels, he falls upon his face, and
from the piostrate form the prayer goes up to heaven: "O my Fa-
ther, if it be possible, lefc this cup pass from me : nevertheless, not as
I will, but as thou wilt." It may have been but a short time that
Jesus remained in this posture of prayer. Brief as it was, on rising
and returning to where he had left the three disciples, he found them
sleeping. Waking them, and singling out Peter, the one of whom
this should have been least expected, he says to him, " Simon, sleep-
est thou ?" Mark 14 : 37. * After all your late professions of being so
willing to follow me to prison and to death, "what, couldst not thou
watch with me one hour ?" ' Then to him and to the others he says,
" Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation : the spirit indeed
is willing, but the flesh is weak." How did the Saviour look, on this
his first return from the place of his agony ? Was the trouble gone
from his countenance? did nothing but the shadow of it remain?
The interval must have brought some relief. When he rose from the
ground, retraced his steps, bent over his disciples, stirred them up
from their slumbers, spoke to them as he did, is it not evident that
for the time the current of his thoughts was changed ; a temporary
calm was spread over his troubled spirit; the inward conflict was not
such as that which had cast him on the ground, and drawn from him
the prayer to his Father? Again, however, our Lord leaves the
three and retires to the same spot. As he reaches it, the heavy agony
is again upon his soul — heavier, if that could be, than before. Again
it bows him to the earth ; again he prays as before, but now still more
earnestly, the inward pressure telling so upon the outward form,
that his sweat is " as it were great drops of blood falling down to the
ground." The human power to bear, strained to its utmost limits,
seems ready to give way. There appears " an angel from heaven
strengthening him." And now there is a second pause or interval of
respite, in which the three are visited a second time, and a second
lime found sleeping. But he does not waken them as he had done
before ; or if he does, he does not stay to speak to those whose eyes
are heavy, and who "wist not what to answer him." He is content
lo stand for a moment, bending on them a look of compassion and
unutterable love. The call to the struggle comes again. A third
time he is on the cold, bare earth; a third time the same words, ej«
634 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
pressive of the same inward conflict and suffering, go up to heaven.
The thrice-repeated prayer is so far answered. The strength is given,
the conflict is over. " Then he cometh to his disciples and saith unto
them, Sleep on now, and take your rest : behold, the hour is at hand,
and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners." Even as
he speaks he hears the sound of approaching footsteps, or catches
sight of the high priest's band, with the traitor at its head, and so
he adds, " Rise, let us be going : behold, he is at hand that doth
betray me." From face and form and voice and spirit every trace of
the inward tumult and agony is gone. Never perhaps in all his life
did the Saviour appear in calmer, serener dignity then when he step-
ped forth to meet the betrayer : nor did the calmness and serenity for
a moment forsake him, all through the trial, and the mocking, and
the scourging, and the crowning with thorns, and the nailing him to
the cross. Nor did the soul-conflict and soul- agony return till, from
the midst of the darkness that for three hours wrapped the cross, we
hear a cry, kindred to those which cleft the midnight air within Geth-
semane, " My God, my God ! why hast thou forsaken me ?"
Passing with Jesus from the upper chamber into the garden, one
of the first impressions made upon us is that of the suddenness and
greatness of the transition. Delivered within the compass of the
same hour, what a contrast between the prayers of the one place and
of the other — the one so calm, so serene, so elevated; the others so
dark and troubled ! Look first at him as, with eyes uplift to heaven,
he offers up the one ; look at him again as, prostrate on the earth, in
garments moist with sweat and blood, he offers up the other. Listen
to him as, speaking on a level with the throne itself, he says, " Fa-
ther, I will that they also whom thou hast given me be with me where
E am, that they may behold my glory." Listen to him as, in peti-
tions brief and broken, wrung from a spirit torn with most intense
sorrow, he says, " Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me."
What a mighty and mysterious descent from that height above to
these depths beneath ! And how rapidly described ; the transition
so quick, with nothing outward to account for it. If it be, as we
know it is, a severe trial for our humanity to pass rapidly from one
extreme of emotion to another, if the trial be greater the stronger the
contrast between the two states of feeling, and the quicker the change
takes place — if rapid passage from extreme joy to extreme grief, or
the reverse, have been known even to loose the silver cord and break
the golden bowl of life — let us ask ourselves to what a trial, apart
from all consideration of the depth or intensity of the emotions them-
selves, must the humanity of our Lord have been exposed during the
GETHSEMANE. 63b
last twelve hours before his death, arising from the very suddenness
and greatness of those alternations through which he passed.
But wherein did the great sorrow which came upon him in Geth-
semane consist ? It is inconceivable and inadmissible that it was the
prospect of those outward sufferings and that bodily death which lay
between him and the grave in which he was next day to be laid, that
agitated to such an extreme degree the spirit of our Saviour, and
wrung from him the thrice-repeated prayer. Admitting to the fullest
extent that our nature shrinks from suffering, recoils from death ;
that suffering and dying are those strange things " for which human
nature in the beginning was not created;" that the purer, fuller, more
perfect that nature is — the more abhorrent to it they must be, and
that, consequently, the intensity of the shrinking, the depth of the
recoil, would be at its maximum point in the sinless humanity of our
Lord — yet are there overbalancing considerations which forbid the
idea that had it been mere ordinary sufferings, such as any other man
placed in the same circumstances might have felt, and a mere ordi-
nary death that Jesus had before him, he would or could have shrunk
in such a way beneath the prospect. For let us remember that if, on
the one hand, we attribute to Christ every sinless infirmity to which
our nature is liable, on the other hand we must attribute to him every
rirtue, and that in its highest quality and degree of which that nature
is capable, and among these patience and fortitude. Other men have
endured as much physical suffering, have passed through as igno-
minious and as torturing deaths, without the slightest ruffling of spirit,
with the calmest and most heroic fortitude, mingling even ecstatic
songs of praise with the sounds of the crackling fagots by which their
bodies were consumed. Are we to degrade our Saviour beneath the
common martyr-level, or believe that a burden that others bore so
easily prostrated him in the garden, forced from him those prayers,
and wrapped him in that bloody sweat?
It is true indeed that Christ had a clear and perfect vision before-
hand of all that he was to endure, such as no other can have, and
this may have heightened the power of the dark prospect that lay
before him. But such a vision was his from the beginning. Why
was it only now, here at Gethsemane, that it so specially and deeply
affected him? Besides, his complete and accurate foreknowledge
extended beyond the cross, embraced the resurrection and ascension.
If in the foreground there were humiliation, suffering, and death, in
the background were exaltation and triumph. Should not the depres
sion produced by the vivid foresight of the one, have been relieved bj
the hope and joy excited by the as vivid foresight of the other ?
636 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Belinquishing the idea that it was the prospect of the physical
sufferings of the cross that induced the agony of the garden, it may
be thought that this agony was due to the presentiment of that deep-
er inward woe which wrung with such bitter anguish the spirit of our
Lord, from the hidden depths of which there went up the mysterious
utterance, "My God, my God! why hast thou forsaken me?" But is
this likely? With us imagination may swell out some threatening
and impending calamity into such false proportions, that we may
actually suffer more from the anticipation than from the reality.
Could it have been so with Christ ? In a mind like his, where all the
faculties and feelings of our nature existed in perfect balance, we
should naturally expect that the due proportion would be observed
between the pressure produced by anticipation and that produced by
the actual event; that the one should be but a shadow of the other.
Is it so here ? Is the Gethsemane sorrow a mere shadow of the sor-
row of the cross ? All that is told us of it testifies that under it, what-
ever it was, the whole power of endurance that was in our Lord's
humanity was tried and tested to the very last degree. It was a
purely mental anguish, yet such a strain did it exert upon the body
that it forced the life-current of the blood out of its accustomed chan-
nels, and sent it forth to mingle with the drops of sweat that fell to
the ground. It was an agony so intense that three times, with the
utmost vehemence of desire, the request went up to heaven, "Father,
if it be possible, let this cup pass from me." We can readily under-
stand that from a quarter of which we shall presently have to speak,
our Saviour's spirit might and did lie open to an anguish of such a
peculiar nature and intensity that it is saying nothing more of him
than that he was a man, to say that such strong crying for relief
issued from his lips ; the vehemence of the desire for this relief offer-
ing a gauge and measure of the pressure that produced it. But we
cannot understand, if it were not the actual endurance itself, but only
the foresight of it that was operating on him, how he who had all
along been looking forward to the decease he was to accomplish at
Jerusalem, who was so straitened till it was accomplished, who knew
so well that it was for that very end he came into the world — should
at this one time be so moved by the mere prospect of the cup being
put into his hand, that he should so vehemently recoil from it, and so
ardently desire that it might pass from him.
We feel ourselves shut up to the conclusion that the agony of the
garden was inward, unique, mysterious, impossible to fathom; the
same in source, the same in ingredients, the same in design, the same
in effect with our Lord's spiritual sufferings on the cross; an integral
GETHSEMANE. 637
and constituent part of the endurance to which, as our spiritual head
and representative, he submitted, and which sprang from our iniqui-
ties being laid upon him, in a way and manner that is not open to
us to comprehend. " He bare our sins in his own body on the tree,"
offering there, not merely or mainly his body to the Eoman execu-
tioner, but his soul in sacrifice to God. Consummated upon the
cross, this soul-offering was made also in the garden. Jesus spake
of an hour and a cup which became so identified in the minds of the
evangelists, that they are used interchangeably in the narrative of
the passion. The hour and the cup were one, embracing the entire
suffering unto death. The hour was on him, and he passed through
it ; the cup was in his hand, he put it to his lips and drank it equally
in the garden and on the cross. In passing through that hour, in
drinking that bitter cup, he made the great atonement for our trans-
gressions. Some great obstacle there must have been in the way of
our restoration to the Divine favor. Whatever it was, by the obedi-
ence unto death of God's dear Son it has been wholly removed.
"Father," he said, "if it be possible, let this cup pass from me." If
ever from this earth a cry for relief from suffering went up to God to
which his ear was open, surely it was this ; whom should the Father
shield from sorrow if not his own dear Son ? Yet the cup did not
pass away. The prayer was answered in the strength to endure
being given, but not in the endurance being removed. To that en-
durance we are to look as furnishing the ground of our forgiveness
and acceptance. It has taken every obstruction which our guilt, the
holiness and justice of the Divine character, the integrity and majesty
of the Divine law, the stability and prosperity of God's great spiritual
empire, interposed between us and the immediate and entire blotting
out of all our iniquities.
Spread over the whole of our Lord's suffering life, it was con-
densed in the agony of the garden and the anguish of the cross.
But why broken into these two great sections, of which we can
scarcely tell which was the larger, or in which the suffering was the
more intense? Why but that in the sight of such a sorrow descend-
ing upon the Saviour's spirit, in the absence of all inflictions from
without — in the quiet of the garden, in the loneliness of the midnight
hour — before a hand had been laid on him, before thorn had touched
his brow, or scourge his back, or nail his hands and feet, we might
learn to separate in our thoughts the mental and spiritual from the
bodily sufferings of Christ ; to recognize the truth of the saying, thai
the sufferings of his soul formed the soul of his sufferings.
But while the breaking of the great endurance into these two por-
63S THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
tions — the one borne in the garden, and the other upon the cross —
carries with it this instructive lesson, is nothing to be learned from
the subdivision of the former into those three parts which were sep-
arated so distinctly from one another? Does this subdivision not
carry with it an indication of the perfect voluntariness on Christ's
part of the sufferings of Gethsemane ? To give them their vicarious
and atoning virtue, it was necessary that Christ's sufferings should
throughout possess this character. Many things about the time and
manner and circumstances of his death were obviously so ordered as
to make it evident that he laid down his life of himself, that no man
took it from him. Much also about the agony of the garden evinces
that it was voluntarily undergone, and might easily, had Christ so
willed, have been avoided. Do not those three breaks and pauses — •
his taking up and laying down the cup, his coming to and going from
his disciples, correspond best with the idea of the agony being one
not laid upon him from without or endured by compulsion, but
one which he could and did take on or lay off, into which he en-
tered by an act and effort of thought and will ; by the vivid reali-
zing of the spiritual relationship in which he stood to the great world
of transgressors ; his voluntary susception of their sins ?
Apart from any such view of it, let us look at the manner of his
dealing with the disciples in the course of his agony. Why did
Jesus, in planting the three at the entrance of the garden, say to
them, "Tarry ye here and watch with me"? It may have been, to
assign to them the post oi watchful sentinels, the duty of guarding
him against surprise, of giving him timely notice of approaching
danger. He had already distinctly warned them of some impending
peril, of a storm that was about to burst on him, of such force and
pressure that it would drive every one of them from his side. He
had told them that one of themselves was that night to betray him.
Although at the time none but John knew about the traitor, the
abrupt departure of Judas must have excited their attention, and
John had time and opportunity on their way out to the garden to tell
them on what errand he had gone. Jesus knew when he dismissed
him that prompt action was needed ; and what he did, Judas must
have done quickly. He had to go to some of the men with whom he
had made his compact, and tell them that he was ready instantly to
fulfil it. He knew where Jesus would go. They might seize him
there at dead of night, without danger of popular tumult. They had
not intended to arrest him during the feast, but the opportunity now
offered is too tempting for them to resist. He may be in their hands
betore day dawn. His trial and condemnation can quickly be de-
^
GETHSEMANE. 639
spatclied. Let instant execution follow, and before the people gather
for the morning sacrifice the hated Galilean may be removed. They
at once agree with the proposal of the traitor, and as the small
company in the upper chamber is breaking up, in another part of
the city a larger one is assembling to move under the leadership of
the betrayer.
Nothing of this was known to the disciples, yet something might
have been suspected. When Jesus placed them at their posts, and
bade them watch with him, might they not naturally enough have
regarded this as a summons to them to guard his hours of prayer
and rest from the approach of the enemy ? Nor does the fact that it
was the fixed and predetermined purpose of Christ to wait for and
voluntarily surrender himself to the high priest's band, militate
against the idea that this duty was laid on them. And had they
proved true to such a charge — scattered as they were like outlying
pickets, first the three, and then farther off the eight — had they kept
a strict lookout upon the path that led out from the city, each eye
searching the shady places, each ear open to catch the sound of ap-
proaching footsteps, long ere it reached the spot the betrayer's com-
pany might have been detected, the warning given, and a timely flight
effected. But the sentinels slept at their posts, till their Master came
and roused them with the words, " Rise, let us be going : behold, he
that betray eth me is at hand."
Christ's call to watchfulness and prayer was not so much for his
sake as for theirs. It was that they might not enter into temptation
so as to be overcome by it. Thick-coming and heavy woes were im-
pending over himself — the arrest, the trial, the condemnation, the
crucifixion. He would prepare for all by prayer. When Judas
comes he will find his Master just risen from his knees, the fitter
thereby to pass in serene composure through all that lay before him.
And he knows that trials await his disciples as well as himself : they
will have to pass through the shame and the reproach of being recog-
nised as his followers ; they will have tests applied to their fidelity
needing more strength than they now possess. He bids them
watch and pray that the needed strength may be imparted. They
neglect the counsel, they waste the precious interval. The be-
trayer is upon them and their Master ; upon him fresh from prayer,
upon them all unprepared, roused from their heavy sleep.
In our lesser sorrows we throw ourselves upon the sympathy of
others ; in our greater we seek solitude and wrap ourselves in silence.
The solitude breeds selfishness. In bearing our heavy burdens we
are apt to become self-engrossed and careless about others. How
MO THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
did the Saviour act in the hour of his so bitter grief? The strong
instinct of humanity was upon him, and he would be alone, yet not
alone. Had absolute solitude been sought for, he would have planted
the whole eleven at the entrance into Gethsemane, and himself gone
so far into the interior that no human eye had been on him, no
earthly witness near. In taking Peter, and James, and John so far
along with him, and placing them where they may have seen and
heard, does not a craving for human sympathy reveal itself? He will
not have them close beside him when the mysterious agony is expe-
rienced. Into it, from its nature as well as from its depth, he knows
they cannot enter. But he would have them near, looking on at a
distance, following him with such broken sympathy as they can give.
It will be a solace and a support to him ; and had they watched and
given him the sympathy he craved, no angel from heaven might have
been needed ; theirs might have been the honor and the happiness
of strengthening him in the hour of weakness. But whatever solace
or support they might have given was withheld. They sleep on all
the time, roused but for a moment to relapse into repose. And when
he comes to them at last, is there not something like mournful irony
and reproach in his words, " Sleep on now, and take your rest" ? ' The
time for watching, praying, sympathizing is past ; no longer can your
sleeping do any harm, your watching do any good. The opportunity
is for ever gone, the good is irrevocably lost, the evil irreparably done.'
It does not so much surprise us that at the first Peter, and James,
and John should have fallen asleep. It had been a long, exciting
evening, and by the strange sorrow that had filled their breasts they
were weakened for watchfulness. But that after the first visit and
the pointed rebuke, Christ should come a second and a third time
and find them sleeping still, it needed his own Divine compassion to
forgive and overlook. His comings and goings, his mingling of these
repeated visits to the disciples with the great atoning grief, how high
in our esteem should this raise our Lord and Saviour : how near to
our hearts should it bring him !
And ere we leave Gethsemane, let a parting thought be bestowed
on the great example Christ has left us of the spirit in which all
heavy trials and sorrows should be met and borne. A stone-cast
measured the distance in the garden which separated him from the
nearest of his followers ; but who shall measure for us that distance
in the spiritual world which then separated the Man of Sorrows from
every other sufferer of our race ? His outward separation and soli-
tude, how imperfect an emblem of the inner solitude of his soul !
From the depths of that lonely agony do we not hear a voice saying
GETHSEMANE. 641
to us, ''Behold ! and see if there be any sorrow like unto my sorrow"?
But though so far removed from us, there is a sense in which we
must have fellowship with this suffering of Christ, must drink of the
same cup, and be baptized with the same baptism. With us also
there come times when all the strength we have is strained to the
uttermost and is ready to give way. There are Gethsemanes in the
followers' as in the Master's life. When they come, let us look at
and try to copy his example. Being in agony, he prayed simply,
earnestly, repeatedly, using the same words again and again. Is
any cup of more than usual bitterness put into our hands, let us too
pray in the same spirit and in the same manner. He mingled care
and thought for others with his own intensest sorrow. In his weak-
ness he accepted an angel's help. Let not the heaviest grief that
ever comes upon us shut our heart to gentle pity. And whoever
they be that come to sympathize with and to help us, let us count
thein as angels sent from heaven, and give them an angel's welcome.
" Let this cup pass from me ; nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou
wjlt." It was not sinful in him to desire relief from poignant grief,
nor is it so in us. But with us as with him, let the desire for relief
mingle with and be lost in the spirit of an entire submission to the
will of our Father in heaven.
^is o* utnti
41
642 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
With Gethsemane is associated the more unseen and incompre-
hensible sufferings of our Lord. In Part V the Studies pass over into
the more visible and outward tribulations and pangs of Christ as the
Sin-bearer which clothe his death with eternal significance and call
forth the homage and love of the race.
The present lesson conducts the student through the opening scenes
of this great tragedy, and embraces the apprehension of Jesus in the
garden, his preliminary examination before Annas, and his trial before
the Sanhedrim.
The one fact which stands out with peculiar clearness is that
Christ laid down his life voluntarily in fulfillment of his redemptive
purpose toward the world. Even in the garden just before his arrest
there appears to stream forth from him a divine force that causes his
assailants to fall to the ground. Our Lord voluntarily inhibits the
operation of this force and suffers himself to be taken and brought
before the Jewish authorities. It is also plain that Jesus when he
stands before the Sanhedrim, with splendid and fearless martyr spirit,
opens the way to his condemnation by this body of bitter foes in his
answer to the question of Caiaphas, who adjures him to state whether
he is the Son of God. Jesus might have declined to reply, but he
answers at once, " I am."
PART V. PASSION WEEK TO THE BURIAL.
Study 20. Betrayal and Trial before the Sanhedrim.
(1) The betrayal of Christ . 643-647
a. Tremendous line of events filling the evening and night of Thursday.. . 643
b. Christ's action challenging the band which comes to arrest him, led
by Judas 644
c. Through some influence they go backward and fall to the ground 645
d. Judas directs them to take and hold the one whom he points out by
a kiss 645-647
e. Jesus' voluntary surrender and kind bearing toward Judas 645-647
(2) Judas, the betrayer 647-651
a. Blinding power of a fixed idea 647, 648
b. Explanation of Judas' character and career 648-651
(3) Christ's arrest 651-653
(4) Denials, repentance, and restoration of Peter 653-662
(5) Christ's examination before Annas 663-666
(6) Trial before the Sanhedrim 666-672
a. Caiaphas, presiding, directs the trial 666-671
b. Under oath Christ asserts his divine Sonship 667-672
c. He is condemned as a blasphemer 667-672
THE
LAST DAY OF OUR LORD'S PASSION
I.
The Betrayal and the Betrayer.*
"The night on which he was betrayed" — that long, sleepless,
checkered, troubled night — the last night of our Lord's suffering
life — that one and only night in which we can follow him throughout,
and trace his footsteps from hour to hour — through what strange
vicissitudes of scene and incident, of thought and feeling, did our
Saviour on that night pass! The meeting in the upper chamber, the
washing of the disciples' feet, the keeping of the Hebrew passover ;
the cloud that gathered round his brow, the sad warnings to Peter,
and the terrible ones to Judas ; the institution of his own Supper, the
tender consolatory discourse, the sublime intercessory prayer; the
garden ; its brief and broken prayers, its deep and awful agony ; the
approach of the high priest's band, the arrest, the desertion by all,
the denials by one; the private examination before Annas, the public
arraignment before the Sanhedrim; the silence as to all minor
charges, the great confession, the final and formal condemnation to
death; all these between the time that the sun of that Thursday
evening set, and the sun of Friday morning rose upon Jerusalem.
"We are all, perhaps, more familiar with the incidents of the first half
of that night, than with those of the second. Of its manifold sor-
rows, the agony in the garden formed the fitting climax. Both out-
wardly and inwardly, it was to the great Sufferer its hour of darkest,
deepest midnight. Let us join him now as he rises from his last
struggle in Gethsemane, and follow till we see him laid in Joseph's
sepulchre.
The sore amazement is past. Some voice has said to the troubled
* Matt. 26 : 47-5G ; Mark 14 . 43-50 - Luke 22 . 47 53 ; John 18 : 2-11.
644 THE LIFE OF OHKIST.
waters of his spirit, Peace, be still! Instead of the stir and tumult
of the soul, there is a calm and dignified composure, which never
once forsakes him, till the same strange internal agony once more
comes upon him on the cross. "Rise," says Jesus, as for the third and
last time he bends over the slumbering disciples in the gaiden, "Rise,
let us be going. Lo, he that betrayeth me is at hand!" Wakeful
as he has been while the others were sleeping, has he heard the noise
of approaching footsteps? has he seen the shadows of advancing
forms, the flickering light of torch and lantern glimmering through
the olive leaves? It was not necessary that eye or ear should give
him notice of the approach. He knew all that the betrayer medita-
ted when, a few hours before, he had said to him, " That thou doest,
do quickly." He had seen and known, as though he had been pres-
ent, the immediate resort of Judas to those with whom he had so
recently made his unhallowed bargain, telling them that the hour
had come for carrying the projected arrangement into execution, and
that he was quite sure that Jesus, as his custom all that week had
been, would go out to Gethsemane so soon as the meeting in the
upper chamber had broken up, and that there they could easily and
surely, without any fear of popular disturbance, lay hold of him.
The proposal was hailed and adopted with eager haste, for there was
no time to be lost — they had but a single day for action left. The
band for seizing him was instantly assembled — " a great multitude,"
quite needlessly numerous, even though resistance had been con-
templated by the eleven ; a band curiously composed — some Roman
soldiers in it from the garrison of Fort Antonia, excited on being
summoned to take part in a midnight enterprise of some difficulty
and danger ; the captain of the temple guard, accompanied by some
subordinates, private servants of Annas and Caiaphas the high
priests, with some members even of the Sanhedrim among them ;
(Luke 22 : 52 ;) a band curiously accoutred — with staves as well as
swords, with lanterns and torches, that, clear though the night was —
the moon being at the full,* they might hunt their victim out through
all the shady retreats of the olive gardens, and prevent the possibility
of escape. Stealthily they cross the Kedron, with Judas at their
head, and come to the very place where all this while Jesus has been
enduring his great agony. Yes ; this is the place where Judas tells
them they will be so sure to find him. Now, then, is the time for the
lanterns and the torches. They are saved the search. Stepping out
suddenly into the clear moonlight, Jesus himself stands before them,
* We know it was so from the day ox f he month on which the passover was
celebrated.
THE BETRAYAL AND THE BETRAYER. 645
and calmly says, "Whom seek ye?" There are many in that band
who know him well enough, but there is not one of them who has
courage to answer — " Thee." A creeping awe is already on their
spirits. They leave it to others, to those who know him but by
name, to say, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus says to them, " I am he ;" and
as soon as he has said it, they go backward, and fall every one to the
ground. Has some strange sight met their eye ? has Jesus been mo-
mentarily transfigured as on the Mount? have some stray beams from
the concealed glory burst forth upon them ? Or is it some inward ter-
ror shot by a hand invisible through their hearts ? Whatever the spell
be that has stripped them of all strength, and driven them backwards
to the ground, it lasts but for a brief season. He who suddenly laid
it on as quickly lifts it off. But, for that short time, what a picture
does the scene present ! Jesus standing in the quiet moonlight,
calmly waiting till the prostrate men shall rise again ; or turning,
perhaps, a pensive look upon his disciples cowering under the shade
of the olive-trees, and gazing with wonder at the sight of that whole
band lying flat upon the ground. For a moment or two, how still it
is! you could have heard the falling of an olive-leaf. But now the
spell is over, and they rise. The Boman soldier starts to his feet
again, as more than half ashamed, not knowing what should have
so frightened him. The Jewish officer gathers up his scattered
strength, wondering that it had not gone for ever. Again the quiet
question comes from the lips of Jesus, " Whom seek ye ?" They say
to him, "Jesus of Nazareth." Jesus answers, "I have told you that
I am he. If therefore ye seek me, let these go their way : that the
saying might be fulfilled which he spake, Of them which thou hast
given me have I lost none."
Perfectly spontaneous, then, on the part of our Divine Bedeemer,
was the delivering of himself up into the hands of his enemies. He
who by a word and look sent that rough hireling band reeling back-
wards to the ground, how easily could he have kept it there; or how
easily, though they had been standing all around him, could he have
passed out through the midst of them, every eye so blinded that it
could not see him, every arm so paralyzed that it could not touch
him ? Judas knew how in such a manner he had previously escaped.
He must have had a strong impression that it would not be so easy
a thing to accomplish the arrest, when he told the men, " Whomso-
ever I shall kiss, that same is he ; take him, and hold him fast."
Take him ; hold him ! it will only be if he please to be taken and to
be held that they will have any power to do it. This perfect freedom
from all outward compulsion, this entirely voluntary surrender of
646 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
himself to suffering and death, enter as necessary elements into the
great atonement. And is not its essential element — its being made
for others — shadowed forth in this outward incident of the Redeem-
er's life, 'Take me,' he said, 'but let these go their way.' It was
to throw a protecting shield over this little flock, that he put forth
his great power over that mixed multitude before him, and made
them feel how wholly they were within his grasp. It was to acquire
for a time such a mastery over them that they should consent to let
his disciples go. It was no part of their purpose beforehand to
do thus. They proved this, when, the temporary impression over,
they seized the young man by the way, whom curiosity had drawn
out of the city, whom they took to be one of his disciples, and who
with difficulty escaped out of their hands.
' Take me, but let these go their way.' John saw, in the freedom
and safety of the disciples thus secured, a fulfilment of the Lord's
own saying in the prayer of the supper-chamber, "Them that thou
gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost." We cannot im-
agine that the beloved disciple saw nothing beyond protection from
common earthly danger in the expression which he quotes; but that
lie saw, in the very manner in which that kind of protection had
been extended, a type or emblem of the higher and spiritual deliver-
ance that Christ has accomplished for his people by his deliverance
unto death. Freedom for us, by his suffering himself to be bound ;
safety for us, by the sacrifice of himself ; life for us, by the death which
he endured : have we not much of the very soul and spirit of the atone-
ment in those few words, ' Take me, but let these go their way'? It
is the spiritual David, the great and good Shepherd, saying, " Let thy
hand be laid upon me ; but as for these sheep, not, O Lord my God,
on them."
Judas stood with those to whom Jesus said, " Whom seek ye ?"
Along with them he reeled back and fell to the ground. Along with
them he speedily regained his standing posture, and was a listener
as the Lord said, " I have told you that I am he ;" inviting them to do
with him as they wished. There is a pause, a hesitation; for who
will be the first to lay hand upon him ? Judas will relieve them of
any lingering fear. He will show them how safe it is to approach
this Jesus. Though the stepping forth of Christ, and the questions
and answers which followed, have done away with all need of the
preconcerted signal, he will yet go through all that he had engaged
to do ; or, perhaps, it is almost a mechanical impulse upon which he
acts, for he had fixed on the thing that he was to do toward accom-
plishing the arrest; he had conned his part well beforehand, and
THE BETRAYAL AND THE BETRAYER. 647
braced himself up to go through with it. Hence, when the time for
action comes, he stops not to reflect, but lets the momentum of his
predetermined purpose carry him along. He salutes Jesus with a
kiss! If ever a righteous indignation might legitimately be felt,
surely it was here. And if that burning sense of wrong had gone no
farther in its expression than simply the refusal of such a salutation,
would not Christ have acted with unimpeachable propriety? But it
is far above this level that Jesus will now rise. He will give an ex-
ample of gentleness, of forbearance, of long-suffering kindness with-
out a parallel. Jesus accepts the betrayer's salutation. He does
more. He says a word or two to this deluded man : " Friend, where-
fore art thou come?" 'Is it possible that thou canst imagine, after
all that passed between us at the supper-table, that I am ignorant ol
thy purpose in this visit? I know that purpose well; thou knowest
that I do ; if not, I will make a last attempt to make thee know and
feel it now. Thought of, cared for, warned in so many ways, art thou
really come to betray such a Master as I have ever been to thee ?
But though thou hast made up thy mind to such a deed, how is it
that thou choosest such a cloak as this beneath which to conceal thy
purpose ? The deed is bad enough itself without crowning it with
the lie of the hypocrite' — "Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man
with a kiss!" — the last complaint of wounded love, the last of the
many and most touching appeals made to the conscience and heart
of the betrayer; rebuke and remonstrance in the words, but surely
their tone is one more of pity than of anger ; surely the wish of the
speaker was to arrest the traitor, if it were not yet too late. Had
Judas yielded even at that last moment ; with a broken and a contrite
heart had he thrown himself at his Master's feet, to bathe with tears
the feet of him whose cheek he had just polluted with his unhallow-
ed kiss ; looking up through those tears of penitence, had he sought
mercy of the Lord, how freely would that mercy have been extended
to him ! who can doubt that he would have been at once forgiven ?
But he did not, he would not yield ; and so on he went, till there was
nothing left to him but the horror of that remorse which dug for him
the grave of the suicide.
We often wonder, as we read his story, how it was ever possible,
that, in the face of so many, such explicit, solemn, affectionate ap-
peals, this man should have so obstinately pursued his course. We
should wonder, perhaps, the less, if we only reflected what a blind-
ing, hardening power any one fixed idea, any one settled purpose,
any one dominant passion, in the full flush and fervor of its ascend-
ency, exerts upon the human spirit ; how it blinds to consequence*
648 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
that are then staring us in the very face ; how it deadens to remon-
strances to which, in other circumstances, we should at once have
yielded ; how it carries us over obstacles that at other times would
at once have stopped us; nay, more, and what perhaps is the most
striking feature of the whole, how the very interferences, for which
otherwise we should have been grateful, are resented ; how the very
appeals intended and fitted to arrest, become as so many goads dri-
ving us on the more determinedly upon our path. So it was with
Judas. And let us not think that we have in him a monstrous speci-
men of almost superhuman wickedness. We should be nearer the
truth, I suspect, if we took him as an average specimen of what the
passion of avarice, or any like passion, when once it has got the mas-
tery, may lead any man to be and do. For we have no reason to
believe of Judas, that from the first he was an utter reprobate. Our
Lord we scarcely can believe would have admitted such a man to the
number of the twelve. Can it be believed of him that when he first
joined himself to Jesus, it was to make gain of that connection?
There was but little prospect of worldly gain in following the Naza-
rene. Nor can we fairly attribute that obstinacy which Judas showed
in the last great crisis of his life, to utter deadness of conscience,
utter hardness of heart. The man who no sooner heard the death-
sentence given against his Master, than — without even waiting to see
if it would be executed — he rushed before the men by whom that
sentence had been pronounced — the very men with whom he had
made his unholy covenant, from whom he had got but an hour or
two before the price of blood — exclaiming in the bitterness of his
heart, " I have sinned, in that I have betrayed innocent blood;"— the
man who took those thirty pieces of silver, which his itching palm
had so longed to clutch, but which now were burning like scorching
lead the hand that grasped them, and flung them ringing on the temple
floor, and hurried to a lonely field without the city walls and hanged
himself, dying in all likelihood before his Master — let us not think of
him that he was utterly heartless — that he had a conscience seared
as with a hot iron.
What, then, is the true explanation of his character and career?
Let us assume that, when he first united himself to Christ, it wag
not of deliberate design to turn that connection into a source of profit.
He found, however, as time ran on, that to some small extent it could
be so employed. The little company that he had joined had chosen
him to be their treasurer, to hold and to dispense the slender funds
which they possessed. Those who are fond of money, as he was, are
generally careful in the keeping, thrifty in their use of it. Judas had
THE BETRAYAL AND THE BETRAYER. 649
those faculties in perfection, and they won for him that office of trust,
to him so terribly dangerous. The temptation was greater than he
could resist. He became a pilferer from that small bag. Little as
it had to feed upon, his passion grew. It grew, for he had no higher
principle, no better feeling, to subdue it. It grew, till he began to
picture to himself what untold wealth was in store for him when his
Master should throw off that reserve and disguise which he had so
long and so studiously preserved, and take to himself his power, and
set up his kingdom — a kingdom which he, in common with all the
apostles, believed was to be a visible and temporal one. It grew,
till delay became intolerable. At the supper in Bethany, it vexed
him to see that box of ointment of spikenard, which might have been
sold for three hundred pence, wasted on what seemed to him an idle
piece of premature and romantic homage. It vexed him still more
to hear his Master rebuke the irritation he had displayed, and speak
now once again, as he had been doing so often lately, of his death
and burial, as if the splendid vision of his kingdom were never to be
realized. Could nothing be done to force his Master on to exercise
his kingly power ? These scribes and Pharisees, who hated him so
bitterly, desired nothing so much as to get him into their hands. If
once they did so, would he not, in self-defence, be obliged to put
forth that power which Judas knew that he possessed? And were
he to do so, things could not remain any longer as they were. The
passover — this great gathering of the people — would soon go past,
and he, Judas, and the rest, have to resume their weary journeyings
on foot throughout Judea. Thus and then it was, that, in all likeli-
hood, the thought flashed into the mind of the betrayer to go and
ask the chief priests what they would give him if he delivered Jesus
into their hands. They offered him thirty pieces of silver, a very
paltry bribe — the price in the old Hebrew code of a slave that was
gored by an ox — less than X5 of our money ; a bribe insufficient of
itself to have tempted even a grossly avaricious man, in the position
in which Judas was, to betray his Master, knowing or believing that
it was unto death. Why, in a year or two Judas might have realized
as much as that by petty pilferings from the apostolic bag. But this
scheme of his would bring his Master to the test. It would expedite
what, to his covetous, ambitious heart, had seemed to be that slow
and meaningless course to a throne and kingdom which his Master
had been pursuing. Not suspecting what the immediate and actual
issue was to be, he made his unholy compact with the high priests.
He made it on the AVednesday of the passion week. Next evening
he sat with Jesus in the supper-chamber. He found himself deteot-
f*50 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ed ; more than one terrible warning was sounded in his ears. Strange,
you may think, that instead of stopping him in his course, these
warnings suggested, perhaps for the first time, the thought that what
he had engaged to do might be done that very night. The words,
" What thou doest do quickly," themselves gave eagerness and firm-
ness to his purpose ; for, after all, though Jesus seemed for the time
so much displeased — let this scheme b«t prosper — let the kingdom
be set up, and would he not be sure to forgive the offence that had
hastened so happy a result ?
Have we any grounds for interpreting in this way the betrayal?
Are we right in attributing such motives to Judas? If not, then
how are we to explain his surprise when he saw his Master, though
still possessing all his wonderful power, as he showed by the healing
of the servant's ear, allow himself to be bound and led away like a
felon ? How are we to explain the consternation of Judas when he
learned that though Jesus, publicly, before the Sanhedrim, claimed
to be the Christ, the Son of God, the King of Israel, yet, instead of
there being any acquiescence in that claim, a universal horror was
expressed, and on the very ground of his making it, he was doomed
to the death of a blasphemer ? Then it was, when all turned out so
differently from what he had anticipated, that the idea of his having
been the instrument of his Master's death entered like iron into the
soul of Judas. Then it was, that, overwhelmed with nameless, count-
less disappointments, vexations, self-reproaches, his very living to see
his Master die became intolerable to him, and in his despair he flung
his ill-used life away.
Accept such solution, and the story of the betrayal of our Lord
becomes natural and consistent; reject it, and have you not difficul-
ties in your way not to be got over by any amount of villany that
you may attribute to the traitor? But does not this solution take
down the crime of Judas from that pinnacle of almost superhuman
and unapproachable guilt on which many seem inclined to place it?
It does ; but it renders it all the more available as a beacon of warn-
ing to us all. For if we are right in the idea we have formed of the
character and conduct of Judas, there have been many since his
time, there may be many still, in the same way, and from the opera-
tion of the same motives, betrayers of Christ. For everywhere he is
a Judas, with whom his worldly interests, his worldly ambition, pre-
vail over his attachment to Christ and to Christ's cause ; who joins
the Christian society, it may be, not to make gain thereby— but who,
when the occasion presents itself, scruples not to make what gam he
can of that connection ; who, beneath the garb of the Christian call
THE BETRAYAL AND THE BETRAYER. 651
ing, pursues a dishonest traffic ; who, when the gain and the godli-
ness come into collision, sacrifices the godliness for the gain. How
many such Judases the world has seen, how much of that Judas spirit
there may be in our own hearts, I leave it to your knowledge of
yourselves and your knowledge of the world to determine.
Let us now resume our narrative of the arrest. Whatever linger-
ing reluctance to touch Christ had been felt, that kiss .of Judas
removed. They laid their hands upon him instantly thereafter,
grasping him as if he were a vulgar villain of the highway, and
binding him after the merciless fashion of the Komans. This is what
one, at least, of his followers cannot bear. Peter springs forth from
the darkness, draws his sword, and aims at the head of the first person
he sees ; who, however, bends to the side, and his ear only is lopped
off. To Christ an unwelcome act of friendship. It ruffles his com-
posure, it impairs the dignity of his patience. For the first and only
time a human creature suffers that he may be protected. The injury
thus done he must instantly repair. They have his hand within their
hold, when, gently saying to them, "Suffer ye thus far," he releases
it from their grasp, and, stretching it out, touches the bleeding ear,
and heals it : the only act of healing wrought on one who neither
asked it of him, nor had any faith in his healing virtue ? but an act
which showed how full of almighty power that hand was which yet
gave itself up to ignominious bonds. Then said Jesus to Peter,
" Put up again thy sword into his place ; for all they that take the
sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now
pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve
legions of angels? But how then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled,
that thus it must be? The cup which my Father hath given me,
shall I not drink it?" He was drinking then, even at that time, of
the same cup in regard to which he had been praying in the garden.
Not only his agonies in Gethsemane and on the cross, but all his
griefs, internal and external, were ingredients in that cup which, for
us and for our salvation, he took, and drank to the very dregs — a cup
put by his Father's hand into his, and by him voluntarily taken, that
the will of his Father might be done, and that the Scriptures might
be fulfilled. All this about the cup, and his Father, and the Scrip-
tures, spoken for the instruction and reproof of Peter, must have
sounded not a little strange to those chief priests and scribes and
elders who have come out to be present, at least, if not to take part
in the apprehension, and who are now standing by his side. But for
them, too, there must be a word, to show them that he is after all a
very brother of our race, who feels as any other innocent man would
652 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
feel if bound thus, and led away as a malefactor. "And Jesus said
unto the chief priests, and captains of the temple, and the elders,
which were come to him, Be ye come out, as against a thief, with
swords and staves? When I was daily with you in the temple, ye
stretched forth no hands against me : but this is your hour, and the
power of darkness." A short hour of fancied triumph theirs ; the
powers of darkness permitted for a short season to prevail ; but
beyond that hour, light, and a full, glorious, eternal triumph his.
" Then all the disciples forsook him and fled." That utter deser-
tion had been one of the incidents of this night of sorrows upon
which his foreseeing eye had already fixed. "The hour cometh," he
had said to them in the upper chamber, "yea, is now come, that ye
shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone :
and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me." It was only
during that hurried march from the garden to the judgment-hall that
Jesus was left literally and absolutely alone: not one friendly eye
upon him ; not one friendly arm within his reach. But this tempo-
rary solitude, was it not the type of the inner, deeper solitude, in
which his whole earthly work was carried on? not the solitude of the
hermit or the monk — he lived ever with and among his fellow-men ;
not the solitude of pride, sullenly refusing all sympathy and aid ; not
the solitude of selfishness, creating around its icy centre a cold, bleak,
barren wilderness ; not the solitude of sickly sentimentality, for ever
crying out that it can find no one to understand or appreciate. No ;
but the solitude of a pure, holy, heavenly spirit, into all whose
deeper thoughts there was not a single human being near him or
around him who could enter ; with all whose deeper feelings there
was not one who could sympathize ; whose truest, deepest motives,
ends, and objects, in living and dying as he did, not one could com-
prehend. Spiritually, and all throughout, the loneliest man that ever
lived was Jesus Christ. But there were hours when that solitude
deepened upon his soul. So was it in the garden, when, but a stone-
cast from the nearest to him upon earth, even that broken, imperfect
sympathy which their looking on him and watching with him in his
great sorrow might have supplied, was denied to him, and an angel
had to be sent from heaven to cheer the forsaken one of earth. So
was it upon the cross, in that dread moment, when he could no
longer even say, "lam not alone, for my Father is with me ;" when
there burst from his dying lips that cry — a cry from the darkest,
deepest, dreariest loneliness into which a pure and holy spirit ever
passed — "My God, my God! why hast thou forsaken me?"
Shall we pity him, in that lonely life, these lonely sufferings, thai
THE DENIALS OF ST. PETER. 653
lonely death ? Our pity he does not ask. Shall we sympathize with
him ? Our sympathy he does not need. But let us stand by the
brink of that deep and awful gulf into which he descended, and
through which he passed ; and let wonder, awe, gratitude, love, enter
into and fill all our hearts, as we remember that that descent and that
passage were made to redeem our souls from death, and to open u]
a way for us into a sinless and sorrowless heaven.
ii.
The Denials. Repentance, and Restoration of 3t
Peter.*
When they saw their Master bound and borne away, all the disci-
ples forsook him and fled. Two of them, however, recovered speedily
from their panic. Foremost now, and bravest of them all, John first
regained his self-possession, and returning on his footsteps followed
the band which conveyed Jesus to the residence of the high priest.
Coming alone, and so far behind the others, he might have found
some difficulty in getting admission. The day had not yet dawned ;
and at so early an hour, and upon so unusual an occasion, the keeper
of the outer door might have hesitated to admit a stranger ; but John
had some acquaintance with the domestics of the high priest, and so
got entrance ; an entrance which Peter might not have ventured to
ask, or asking, might have failed to get, had not John noticed him
following in the distance, and, on looking back as he entered, seen
him standing outside the door. He went, therefore, and spoke to the
porteress, who at his instance allowed Peter to pass in. The two
disciples made their way together into the interior quadrangular hall,
at the upper and raised end of which Jesus was being cross-examin-
ed by Annas. It was the coldest hour of the night, the hour that
precedes the dawn, and the servants and officers had kindled a fire
in the upper end of the hall where they were gathered. Peter did
not wish to be recognized, and the best way he thought to preserve
his incognito was to put at once the boldest face he could upon it,
act as if he had been one of the capturing band and had as good a
right to be there as others of that mixed company, as little known in
*Matt. 26:57-59, 69-75; Mark 14:54,55,66-72; Luke 22:54-62; John
18 : 15-27 ; Mark 16 : 7 ; John 21 : 15-17.
654 THE LIFE OF CHEIST
this palace as himself. So stepping boldly forward, and litting dowc
among the men who were warming themselves around the fire, he
made himself one of them. The woman who kept the door was
standing near. The strong light of the kindling fire, falling upon
that group of faces, her eye fell upon Peter's. That surely, it occur-
red to her as she looked at it, was the face of the man whom she had
admitted a few minutes ago, of whose features she had caught a
glimpse as he passed by. She looks again, and looks more earnestly.
John 18 : 17 ; Mark 14 : 67 ; Luke 22 : 56. Her first impression is con-
firmed. It is John's friend; that Galilean's friend; some friend too,
no doubt of this same Jesus. She says so to a companion by her
side; but not satisfied with that, wondering, perhaps, at the way in
which Peter was comporting himself, she waits till she has caught
his eye, and going up to him she says : " Art not thou also one of this
man's disciples?" a short, abrupt, peremptory, unexpected challenge.
It takes Peter entirely by surprise. It throws him wholly off his
guard. There they are, the eyes of all those men around now turn-
ed inquiringly upon him ; and there she is — a woman he knows noth-
ing of — perhaps had scarcely noticed as he passed quickly through
the porch — a woman who can know nothing about him, yet putting
that pert question, to which, if he is to keep up the character he has
assumed, there must be a quick and positive reply. And so the first
hasty falsehood escapes his lips. The woman, however, wont believe
him when he says that he does not understand her question. Both to
himself and to others around her, she re-affirms her first belief. Peter
has to back his first falsehood by a second and a third : " Woman, 1
am not one of this man's disciples ; I know him not." Peter's first
denial of his Master.
He has now openly committed himself, and he must carry the thing
through as best he can. He is not at ease, however, in his seat with
the others around the fire. The glare of that light is too strong.
Those prying eyes disturb. As soon as conveniently he can, without
attracting notice, he rises and retires into the shadow of the porch,
through which in entering he had passed. A cock now crows with-
out. He hears but heeds it not. Perhaps he might have done so,
had not another woman — some friend in all likelihood of the por-
teress with whom she had been conversing — been overheard by him
affirming most positively, as she pointed him out, "This fellow also
was with Jesus of Nazareth." And she too comes up to him and
repeats the saying to himself. The falsehood of the first denial he
has now to repeat and justify. He does so with an oath, declaring.
"I do not know the man." Peter's second denial of his Master.
THE DENIALS OF ST. PETER. 655
A full hour lias passed. The examination going on at the other
end of the hall has been engrossing the attention of the onlookers.
Peter's lost composure and self-confidence have in a measure been
regained. He is out in the hall again, standing talking with the
others ; no glare of light upon his face, yet little thinking all the
while that by his very talking he is supplying another mode of
recognition. And now for the third time, and from many quarters,
he is challenged. One said, " Of a truth this fellow was with him."
A second: "Did T not see thee with him in the garden?" A third:
"Thy speech bewrayeth thee." Beset and badgered thus, Peter
begins to curse and to swear, as he affirms, "I know not the man of
whom ye speak." Peter's third and last denial of his Lord.
Truly a very sad and humbling exhibition this of human frailty.
But is it one so rare ? Has it seldom been repeated since ? Have
we never ourselves been guilty of a like offence against our Saviour ?
Is there no danger that we may again be guilty of it ? That we may
be prepared to give a true answer to such questions, let us consider
wherein the essence of this offence of the apostle consisted, and by
what steps he was led to its commission. His sin against his Mas-
ter lay in his being ashamed and afraid to confess his connection
with him, when taunted with it at a time when apparently confession
could do Christ no good, and might greatly damage the confessor.
It was rather shame than fear, let us believe, which led to the
first denial. It was in moral courage, not physical, that Peter failed.
By nature he was brave as he was honest. It was no idle boast of
his, "Lord, I will follow thee to prison and to death." Had there
been any open danger to be faced, can we doubt that he would
gallantly have faced it ? Had his Master called him to stand by his
side in some open conflict with his enemies, would Peter have for-
saken him ? His was one of but two swords in the garden ; those
two against all the swords and other weapons of that multitude.
But even against such odds, Peter, bold as a lion, drew his sword,
and had the use of it been allowed would have fought it out till he
had died by his Master's side. But it is altogether a new and
unexpected state of things, this willing surrender of himself by Jesus
into the hands of his enemies ; this refusal, almost rebuke, of any
attempt at rescue or defence. It unsettles, it overturns all Peter's
former ideas of his Master's power, and of the manner in which that
power was to be put forth. He can make nothing of it. It looks as
if all those fond hopes about the coming kingdom were indeed to
perish. Confused, bewildered, Peter enters the high priest's hall.
Why should he acknowledge who he is, or wherefore he is there?
(j56 THE LITE OF CHRIST.
What harm can there be in his appearing for the time as indifferent
to Christ's fate as any of these officers and servants among whom
he sits? That free and easy gait of theirs he assumes; goes in
with all they say; perhaps tries to join with them in their coarse,
untimely mirth. First easy yet fatal step, this taking on a character
ftot his own. He is false to himself before he proves false to his
Master. The acted lie precedes the spoken one; prepares for it,
almost necessitates it. It was the rash act of sitting down with those
men at that fireside, that assumption of the mask, the attempt to
appear to be what he was not, which set Peter upon the slippery
edge of that slope, down which to such a depth he afterwards
descended. Why is it we think so ? Because we have asked our-
selves the question, Where all this while was his companion John,
and how was it faring with him ? He too was within the hall, yet
there was no challenging or badgering of him. The domestics indeed
knew him, and he may be safe from any interference on their part;
but there are many here besides who know as little about him as
they do about Peter. Yet never once is John questioned or dis-
turbed. And why, but because he had joined none of their com-
panies, had attempted no disguise; his speech was not heard be-
wraying him. Had you looked for him, you would have found him
in some quiet shaded nook of that quadrangle, as near his Master
as he could get, yet inviting no scrutiny, exposing himself to no
detection.
That first false act committed, how natural with Peter was all that
followed! His position, once taken, had to be supported, had to be
made stronger and stronger to meet the renewed and more impetu-
ous assaults. So is it with all courses of iniquity. The fatal step is
the first one, taken often thoughtlessly, almost unconsciously. But
our feet get hopelessly entangled ; the weight that drags us along the
incline gets at every step the heavier, till onward, downward we go
into depths that at the first we would have shuddered to contemplate.
In this matter, then, of denying our Lord and Master Jesus Christ,
let us not be high-minded, but fear; and, taking our special warning
from that first false step of Peter, should we ever happen to be thrown
into the society of those who bear no liking to the name or the cause
of the Redeemer, let us beware lest, hiding in inglorious shame our
faces from him, we be tempted to say or to do what for us, with our
knowledge, would be a far worse thing to say or do, than what was
said and done by Peter, in his ignorance within the high priest's
hall.
The oaths with which he sealed his third denial were vet fresh on
THE DENIALS OF PETER. 657
Peter's lips,* when a second time the cock crew. And that shrill
sound was yet ringing in his ears when " the Lord turned and looked
upon Peter." How singularly well-timed that look ! The Lord is
waiting till the fit moment come, and instantly seizes it. It might he
wrong in us to say that but for the look, the second cock-crowing
would have been as little heeded as the first. It might be wrong in
us to say that, but for the awakening sound, the look would of itself
have failed in its effect. But we cannot be wrong in saying that the
look and the sound each helped the other, and that it was the stri-
king and designed coincidence of the two — their conjunction at the
very time when Peter was confirming his third denial by oaths — that
formed the external agency which our Lord was pleased to contrive
and employ for stirring the sluggish memory and quickening the dead
conscience of the apostle. And sluggish memories, dead consciences,
are they not often thus awakened by striking outward providences
cooperating with the word and with the Spirit? Have none of us
been startled thus, as Peter was, amid our denials or betrayals of our
Master ? Let us bless the instrument, whatever it may be, by which
so valuable a service is rendered, and see in its employment only
another proof of the thoughtful, loving care of him who would not
let us be guilty of such offences without some means being taken to
alarm and to recover.
Let us believe, however, that of the two — the sound and the look —
the chief power and virtue lay in the latter. " The Lord turned."
He turned from facing those scowling judges ; from listening to all
the false testimony brought forward against him ; from bearing all
the insults that masters and servants were heaping upon him; from
all the excitements of a trial which he knew was to end in his con-
demnation unto death. Forgetful of self, still thoughtful of his own,
he " turned and looked upon Peter." Was that a look of anger; of
umningled, unmitigated rebuke ? Such a look might have sent Peter
away to hang himself as Judas did; but never to shed such tears of
penitence as he went out to weep. The naked eye of the very God-
head might be on us ; but if from that eye there looked out nothing
but stern, rebuking, relentless wrath, the look of such an eye might
scorch and wither, but never melt and subdue hearts like ours.
Doubtless there was reproach in the look which Jesus bent upon
Peter ; gentle reproach, all the more powerful because of its gentle-
ness. But that reproach, quickly as it was perceived, and keenly as
it was felt, formed but a veil to the tender, forgiving, sympathizing
* •■ Immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew." Luke 22 : 60. See alao
Matt. 26: 74.
Ufe efOhrlrt. 42
658 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
love which the Master felt for the erring disciple. Volumes of pity
and compassion lay enfolded in that look. It told the apostle how
well He, of whom he had just been saying that he knew him not,
knew 1dm ; how thoroughly he knew him when he forewarned him of
his fall. But it told Peter at the same time, that it was no thought
or feeling of the injury or wrong that had been done personally to
himself, which made Jesus fix such an earnest gaze upon him. Not
so much of himself as of Peter was he thinking : not for himself, but
for Peter was he caring. It was the thought of that wrong which
Peter had been doing to himself, which winged the look, and sent it
on its hallowed errand into Peter's heart. He felt, as it fell upon
him, that it was the look of one, not angrily complaining of injury,
not indignantly demanding redress, but only desiring that Peter
might feel how unkindly, ungratefully, ungenerously he had acted
towards such a Master; of one who wished him above all things to
be assured that if he but saw and felt his error, there were readiness
and room enough in his heart to receive him back at once and fully
into favor — to forgive all, forget all, be all to him he had ever been.
Another kind of look the apostle might have encountered unflinch-
ingly, but not a look like that. Instantly there flashed upon his
memory those words of prophetic warning, spoken a few hours be-
fore in the guest-chamber. Thrice had Jesus forewarned him, that
before the cock crew twice, he should thrice deny him. Had he never
thought of these words till now ? In the distraction of the moment
he might have allowed the first cock-crowing to pass unheeded, but
how, during the whole hour (Luke 22 : 59) which followed his first
two denials, should that striking warning never once have occurred
to his memory ? Very strange it seems to lis ; but very strange are
the moods and passions of the mind — what is remembered by it, and
what forgotten, when some new strong tide of thought and feeling
rushes in, and fills and agitates the soul. In the strange, unexpect-
ed, perilous position in which he had so suddenly been placed, Peter
had forgotten all — the meeting of the upper chamber, the triple warn-
ing, the "Verily, verily, I say unto you," which had then sounded in
his ears. But now, as if the awakened memory, by the very fulness
and vividness of their recall, would repair the past forgetfulness, he
sees all, hears all again. Those words of warning are anew ringing
in his ears, and as he thinks how fearfully exact the fulfilment of
those forgotten predictions of his Master has been, a sense of guilt
and shame oppresses him. He can bear that look no longer; he
turns and hurries out of the hall, seeking a place to shed his bitter
tears — tears not like those of Judas, of dismal and hopeless remorse,
THE KEPENTANCE OF PETER. 659
but of genuine and unaffected repentance. He goes out alone, but
whither? It was still dark. The day had not jet dawned. He
would not surely at such an hour, and in such a state of feeling, go
back at once into the city, to seek out and join the others who had
fled. Such deep and bitter grief as his seeks solitude; and where
could he find a solitude so suitable as that which his Lord and Mas-
ter had so loved? We picture him as visiting alone the garden of
Gethseniane, not now to sleep while his Lord is suffering; but to
seek out the spot which Jesus had hallowed by his agony, to mingle
his tears with the great drops of blood which had fallen down to the
ground.
Where and how he spent the two dismal days which followed we
do not know. After that look from Him in the judgment-hall, he
never saw his Lord alive again. But as on the third morning we
find John and him together, we may believe that it was from the lips
of the beloved disciple — the only one of all the twelve who was pres-
ent at the trial before Pilate, and who stood before the cross — that
Peter heard the narrative of that day's sad doings; how they bound
and scourged and mocked and spat upon the Lord; how they nailed
him to the cross, and set him up in agony, to die. And at each part
of the sad recital, how would that heart, softened by penitence, be
touched; how would it grieve Peter to remember that he too had
had a share in laying such heavy burdens on the last hours of his
Lord's suffering life ! That Master whom he had so dishonorably and
ungratefully denied, was now sleeping in the grave. Oh, but for one
short hour with him — a single interview — that he might tell him how
bitterly he repented what he had done, and get from his Master's liv-
ing, loving lips the assurance that he had been forgiven ! But that
never was to be. He should never see him more. Never, grief-
blinded man ? Thine eye it sees not, thine ear it hears not, neither
can that sorrow-burdened heart of thine conceive what even now Jesus
is preparing for thee. The third morning dawns. The Saviour rises
triumphant from the grave ; in rising, sets the angels as sentries be-
fore the empty tomb ; gives to them the order that, to the first visit-
ants of the sepulchre, this message shall be given : " Go, tell the dis-
ciples and Peter, that he is risen from the dead." This message from
the angel, Peter had not heard* when he and John ran out together
to the sepulchre, and found it empty. But he heard it not long after.
Who may tell what strange thoughts that singling out of Mm — that
special mention of his name by those angelic watchers of the sepuh
* Mary Magdalene, on whose report they acted, had seen no angel on hei
first visit to the sepuicur*.
660 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
chre — excited in Peter's heart ? How came those angels to know or
think of him at such a time as this? It could not have been their
own doing. They must have got that message from the Lord him-
self — been told by him particularly to name Peter to the women. But
was it not a thing most wonderful, that in the very act of bursting the
barriers of the grave, there should be such a remembrance of him on
the part of that Master whom he had so lately denied ? Was it not
an omen for good ? Peter had his rising hopes confirmed, his doubts
and fears all quenched, when, some time in the course of that fore-
noon, waiting till John and he had parted — waiting till he could meet
him alone, and speak to him with all the greater freedom and ful-
ness — Jesus showed himself to Peter. Before he met the others to
speak peace, he hastened to meet Peter to speak pardon. One of
the first offices of the risen Saviour was to wipe away the tears of
the penitent.
" Go your way," said the angel to the women at the sepulchre,
" tell his disciples and Peter, that he goeth before you into Galilee ;
there shall ye see him, as he said unto you." The paschal festival,
and Christ's own presence, kept the apostles for eight days and more
in the holy city. But as, after those two interviews in the evenings
of the first two Lord's days of the Christian church, Jesus did not
appear to them again, the eleven, presuming that he had gone before
them to Galilee, also went thither. The return to their old homes
and haunts, the sight of their nets and fishing-boats, the absence of
any specific instructions as to the future, suggest to some of them the
thought of taking up again their earlier occupation. Seven of them
are walking together one evening by the side of the lake. It looks
tempting ; the boats and the nets are near, and it is the best hour of
all the day for fishing. Peter — the very one from whom we should
have expected a first proposal of this kind to come — says to them, "I
go a fishing." They all go with him. They toil all the night, but
catch nothing. As morning breaks, they see a man standing on the
shore, seen but dimly through the haze, but near enough for his voice
to be heard across the water. "Children," he says, "have ye any
meat ?" They tell him they have none. " Cast the net," he replies,
"on the right side of the ship, and ye shall find." And now they are
not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes. This could scarcely
fail to recall to the memory of some at least within the boat, that
other miraculous draught of fishes, by which, now nearly three years
before, three out of the twelve apostles were taught to forsake all and
follow Jesus, that he might make tu^m fishers of men. This repeti-
tion of the miracle was nothing else than a symbolic renewal of that
THE RESTORATION OF PETER. 661
first commission, intended to teach the twelve that their apostolic
calling still held good. There was one, however, of the seven who
gathered round Jesus at the morning meal which he spread for them
on the shore, when their fisher's toil was over, whose position tow-
ards that commission and apostleship had become peculiar. He had
been in the habit of taking a very prominent place among the twelve,
and often acted as their representative and spokesman. But on the
night of the betrayal he had played a singularly shameful and incon-
sistent part. They had all, indeed, forsaken their Master; but who
would have thought that the very one of them who that night had
been so vehement in his assertions that though all men, all his fel-
low-disciples, should forsake his Master, he never would, should yet
so often, and with such superfluous oaths, have denied that he ever
knew, or had anything to do with Jesus ? True it was that Jesus had
forgiven Peter. His fellow- disciples, also, had forgiven that over-
boastful magnifying of himself above the others. There was some-
thing so frank about him, and so genuine; such outgoings of an hon-
est, manly, kindly, generous nature, that they could not bear against
him any grudge. They were all now on their old terms with one
another. But how will it stand with Peter if that apostolic work has
to be taken up again ? How will he feel as to resuming his old posi-
tion among the twelve ? Will he not, in the depth of that humility
and self-distrust taught him by his great fall, shrink now from pla-
cing himself even on the same level with the others ? And how will
his Lord and Master feel and act as to his reinstatement in that office
from which by his transgression he might be regarded as having
fallen? To all these questions there were answers given, when Jesus,
once more singling Peter out, said to him, "Simon, son of Jonas" —
the very giving him his old and double name sounding as a note of
preparation for the important question which was to follow, " Simon,
son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these," ' thy brethren, my other
disciples, do ?'-• -a gentle yet distinct enough reminder of that former
saying: "Though all men should be offended, I never will;" a deli-
cate yet searching probe, pressed kindly but firmly home into the
depths of Peter's heart; a skilful method of testing and exhibiting
the truth and depth of Peter's repentance, without subjecting him to
the painful humiliation of having the terrible denials of his Master
brought up and dwelt upon, either by Jesus in the way of charge, or
by himself in the way of confession. The best way of trying any
man, whether he has really repented of any sinful deed, is to place
him again in the like circumstances, and see if he will act in the like
manner. This is the way in which the Lord now tries Peter. Will
j
662 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
he again compare himself with the others; will he set himself above
them ; will he say as much now about his love being greater than
theirs, as he did then about his courage ; will he repeat that boasting
which was the precurser of his fall ? How touchingly does his an-
swer show that he perfectly understood the involved reference to the
past; that he had thoroughly learned its humbling lessons? No
longer any comparing himself with or setting himself above others —
the old Peter-like frankness and fervor in the "Tea, Lord, I love
thee," but a new humility in it, for he will not say how much ho
loves, still less will venture to say that he loves more than others :
and a deeper humility still, for he will not offer his own testimony as
to the love he feels, he will trust no more his own deceitful heart,
nor ask his Lord to trust it, but throwing himself upon another
knowledge of that heart which had proved to be better than his, he
says, "Yea, Lord, thou knoiuest that I love thee." Our Lord's reply
is a most emphatic affirmative response to this appeal. It is as if he
had said at large, 'Yes, Simon Barjona, I do know that thou lovest
me I know, too, that thou wouldst make no boast of thy love, nor
in that or anything else set thyself any longer above thy fellows ; and
now, that these thy brethren may know and see it too, how hearty
thy penitence has been, how thoroughly it has done its humbling
work, and how readily I own and acknowledge thee as being all to
me thou ever wert; therefore now, in presence of these brethren, I
renew to thee the apostolic commission — publicly reinstate thee in
the apostolic office — " Feed my sheep." I need not ask thee again
whether thou lovest me more than others. I will prove thee no more
by that allusion to the past; but I have once, twice, thrice to put
that other general question to thee, that as three times I warned
thee, and three times thou didst deny me, even so I may three times
restore thee.' Can we wonder that Peter was grieved, when for the
third time that question, "Lovest thou me ?" was put to him. It was
not the grief of doubt, as if he suspected that Jesus only half-believed
his word; but the grief of contrition, a grief which grew into a deeper
sadness at the distinct allusion which the thrice-repeated question
evidently bore to his three denials. And yet even in that sadness
there is comfort; the comfort of feeling that his affectionate Master
is giving him the opportunity of wiping away his threefold denial by
threefold confession. And so, with a fuller heart, and in stronger
words than ever, will he make avowal of his love: "Lord, thou know*
est all things: thou knowest that I love thee."
THE SANHEDJLUM. 665
III.
The Trial before The Sanhedrim.*
TnE Jews regarded their day as beginning at one sunset and end-
ing with the next. This interval was not divided into twenty-four
parts or hours of equal and invariable length. They took each day
by itself, from sunrise to sunset, and each night by itself, from sunset
to sunrise, and divided each into twelve equal parts or hours ; so that
a Jewish hour, instead of being, as it is with us, a fixed measure of
time, varied in its length as each successive day and night varied in
theirs at different seasons of the year. Neither did the Jews begin
as we do, reckoning the twelve hours into which the day and night
were respectively divided, from midday and midnight, but from sun-
set and sunrise ; their sixth hour of the night corresponding thus with
our twelve o'clock, our midnight ; their sixth hour of the day with our
twelve o'clock, our midday. There were but two periods of the year,
those of the autumnal and vernal equinox, when, day and night being
exactly equal, the length of the hours in both was precisely the same
with our own. It was at one of these periods, that of the vernal equi-
nox, that the Jewish passover was celebrated, and it was on the day
which preceded its celebration that our Lord was crucified. It was
close upon the hour of sunrise on that day that Jesus was carried to
the prsetorium, to be examined by the Eoman governor. Assuming
that he entered Gethsemane about midnight, and remained there
about an hour, the interval between the Jewish seventh and twelfth
hour of the night, or between our one and six o'clock of the morning,
was spent in the trial before Annas and Caiaphas, both reckoned as
high priests, the one being such de jure, the other de facto. They
seem to have been living at this time in the same palace into the
hall of which Jesus was carried immediately after his arrest. It was
in this hall, and before Annas, that Jesus was subjected to that pre-
liminary informal examination recorded in the eighteenth chapter of
the gospel of St. John, ver. 19-24. He was to be formally tried,
with show at least of law, before the Sanhedrim, the highest of the
Jewish courts; but this could not be done at once. Some time was
needed to call the members of that court together, and to consult as
to the conduct of the trial. Annas was there from the first, awaiting
the return of the band sent out to arrest the Saviour. His son-in-
law Caiaphas was in all likelihood by his side, eager both and ready
* John 18 : 19-24 ; Luke 22 : 66-71 ; Matt, 26 : 59-68 ; Mark 14 . 53-65.
664 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
to proceed. But they could not act without their colleagues, not
pronounce any sentence which they might call upon the Koman gov-
ernor at once to ratify and execute. While the messengers, however,
are despatched to summon them, and the members of the Sanhedrim
are gathering, Annas may prepare the way by sounding Christ, in a
far-off, unofficial, conversational manner, and may perhaps extract
from his replies some good material upon which the court may after-
ward proceed. Calling Jesus before him, he puts to him some ques-
tions about his disciples and his doctrine ; questions fair enough, and
proper enough as to their outward form, yet captious and inquisito-
rial, intended to entangle, and pointing not obscurely to the two main
charges to be afterwards brought against him, of being a disturber of
the public peace, and a teacher of blasphemous doctrines.
First, then, about his disciples : Annas would like to know what
this gathering of men around him meant; this forming them into a
distinct society. By what bond or pledge to one another were the
members of this new society united; what secret instructions had
they got; what hidden objects had they in view? Though Christ
might not reveal the secrets of this combination, yet, let it but ap-
pear — as by his very refusal to give the required information it might
be made to do — that an attempt was here being made to organize a
confederation all over the country, how easy it would be to awaken
the jealousy of the Eoman authorities, and get them to believe that
some insurrectionary plot was being hatched which it was most de-
sirable at once to crush, by cutting off the ringleader. Such we know
to have been the impression so diligently sought to be conveyed into
the mind of Pontius Pilate. And Annas began by trying whether he
could get Jesus to say anything that should give a color of truth to
such an imputation. Penetrating at once his design, knowing thor-
oughly what his real meaning and purposes were, our Lord utterly
and indignantly denies the charge that was attempted thus to be fas-
tened on him. Neither as to his disciples, nor as to his doctrine —
neither as to the instructions given to his followers, nor as to the
bonds of their union and fellowship with one another, had there been
anything of the concealed or the sinister ; not one doctrine for the peo-
ple without, and another for the initiated within ; no meetings under
cloud of night in hidden places for doubtful or dangerous objects.
"I spake," said Jesus, "openly to the world; I ever taught in the
synagogue and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and
in secret" — that is, in the sense in which I know that you mean and
use the term secret — "have I said nothing; why askest thou me?"
This question tells the judge how naked and bare that hypoeriti
THE SANHEDRIM. 665
cal heart of his lies to the inspection of his prisoner : " Why askest
thou me ?" ' Put that question, Annas, to thy heart, and let it an-
swer thee, if it be not so deceitful as to hide its secrets from thine own
eyes. "Why askest thou me?" Art thou really so ignorant as thou
pretendest to be ; thou, who hast had thy spies about me for well-
nigh three years, tracking my footsteps, watching my actions, report-
ing my words? "Why askest thou me ?" Dost thou really care to
know, as these questions of thine would seem to indicate? then go,
"ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold,
they know what I said.'" A boldness here, a touch of irony, a stroke
of rebuke, which perhaps our Lord might not have used, had it been
upon his seat and in his office as president of the Sanhedrim that the
high priest was speaking to him; had it not been for the mean ad-
vantage which he was trying to take of him ; had it not been for the
cloak of hypocrisy which, in trying to take that advantage, he had
assumed. We shall see presently, at least, that our Lord's tone and
manner were somewhat different when his more formal trial came on.
Christ's sharp sententious answer to Annas protected him — and per-
haps that was one of its chief purposes — from the repetition and pro-
longation of the annoyance. It seems to have silenced the high priest.
He had made but little by that way of interrogating his prisoner, and
he wisely gives it up. Whatever resentment he cherished at being
checked and spoken to in such a manner, he refrained from any
expression of it, biding the hour when all his bitter pent-up hatred of
the Nazarene might find fitter and fuller vent.
But there was one of his officers who could not so restrain him-
self, who could not bear to see his master thus, as he thought, insult-
ed, and who, in the heat of his indignation, struck Christ with the
palm of his hand — some forward official, who thought in this way to
earn his master's favor, but who only earned for himself the unenvi-
able notoriety of having been the first to begin those acts of inhuman
violence with which the trial and condemnation of Jesus were so
largely and disgracefully interspersed. Others afterwards came for-
ward to mock and jostle and blindfold, to smite and to spit upon our
Lord, to whom he answered nothing; but when that first stroke was
inflicted, with the question, "Answerest thou the high priest so?"
Jesus did not receive it in silence. He answered the question by
another: " If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well,
why smitest thou me ?" Best comment this on our Lord's own pre-
cept : " If thy brother smite thee on the one cheek, turn to him the
other also;" and a general key to all like Scripture precepts, teach-
in er ns that the true observance of them lies not in the fulfilment ol
666 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
them as to the letter, but in the possession and exhibition of the
spirit which they prescribe. How much easier would it be when
smitten upon the one cheek, to turn the other for a second stroke,
than to be altogether like our Lord in temper and spirit under the
infliction of the stroke ! More difficult, also, than any silence, to
Imitate that gentle answer. The lips might be sealed, while the heart
was burning with anger. But it was out of the depths of a perfect
patience, a gentleness which nothing could irritate, that the saying
came: "If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well,
why smitest thou me?" "Think," says Chrysostom, "on him who
said these words, on him to whom they were said, and on the reason
why they were said, and these words will, with divine power, cast
down all wrath which may rise within thy soul."
But now at last the whole council has assembled, Caiaphas has
taken his seat as president, and they go more formally to work.
Their object is to convict him of some crime which shall warrant
their pronouncing upon him the severest sentence of the law. That
the appearance of justice may be preserved,* they must have wit-
nesses ; these witnesses must testify to some speech or act of Christ
which would involve him in that doom ; and as to any specific charge,
two of these witnesses must agree before they can condemn. They
could have got plenty of witnesses to testify as to Christ's having
within the last few days openly denounced themselves, the members
of the Sanhedrim, as fools and blind, hypocrites, a very generation
of vipers; but to have convicted Christ upon that count or charge
would have given to their proceedings against him the aspect of per-
sonal revenge. They could have got plenty of witnesses to testify
as to Christ's having often broken and spoken slightingly of ordinan-
ces and traditions of the Pharisees ; but there were Sadducees among
their own members, and the council might thus have been divided.
They could have got plenty of witnesses to testify as to Christ's fre-
quent profanation of the Sabbath; but how should they deal with
those miracles, in or connected with the performance of which so
many of these cases of profanation of the Sabbath had occurred ?
They are in difficulty about their witnesses. They bring forth many,
but either the charge which it is proposed to establish against Christ
comes not up to the required degree of criminality, or the clumsy
witnesses, brought hastily forward, undrilled beforehand, break down
* It would appear that in holding their council during the night, and in con-
demning Christ solely upon his own confession, the Jews violated express enact-
ments of their own code. See "Jesus devant Caiphe et Pilate — Refutation du
shapitre de M. Salvador, intitule 'Jugement et Condamnation de Jesus.'" pair
M. Dupin
THE SANHEDEIM. 667
hi their testimony. Two, however, clo at last appear, who seem at
first sight to agree; but when minutely questioned as to the words
which they allege that more than two years before they had heard
him utter about the destruction of the temple, they report them dif-
ferently, so that "neither did their witness agree." The prosecution
is in danger of breaking down for want of proof.
All this time the accused has observed a strange — to his judges
an unaccountable and provoking silence. He hears as though he
heard not — cared not — were indifferent about the result. It is more
than the presiding judge can stand. He rises from his seat, and fix-
ing his eyes on Jesus, says to him, " Answerest thou nothing ?" * Hast
thou nothing to say? no question to put, no explanation to offer, as
to what these witnesses testify against thee?' Jesus returns the
look, but there is no reply ; he stands as silent, as unmoved as ever.
Baffled, perplexed, irritated, the high priest will try yet another way
with him. Using the accustomed Jewish formula for administering
an oath — a formula recited by the judge, and accepted without repe-
tition by the respondent — " I adjure thee," said the high priest, " by
the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son
of God." Appealed to thus solemnly, by the first magistrate of his
nation, sitting in presidency over the highest of its courts, our Lord
keeps silence no longer. But it is in words that must have struck
every auditor with wonder that he replies to the high priest's adjura-
tion. He sees quite through the purpose of the high priest. He
knows quite well what will be the immediate issue of his reply. Yet
he says, '"I am;" I am the Christ, the Son of the Blessed; "and
ye" — ye who are sitting there now as my judges — "ye shall see the
Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the
clouds of heaven." ' It is our Lord's own free and full confession,
his public and solemn assertion of his claim to the Messiahship, and
Sonship to God. The time for all concealment or reserve is past.
Jesus will now openly, not only take to himself his own name, assume
his office, and assert his Divine prerogatives, but in doing so he will
let those earthly dignitaries, who have dragged him thus to their tri-
bunal, before whose judgment-seat he stands, know that the hour is
coming which shall witness a strange reversal in their relative posi-
tions — he being seen sitting on the seat of power, and they, with all
the world beside, seen standing before his bar, as on the cloudt of
heaven he comes to judge all mankind.
The effect of this confession, this sublime unfolding of his true
character, and prophecy of his second coming, was immediate, and
though extraordinary, not unnatural. The high priest, as soon as he
668 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
drank in the real meaning of the words which fell on his astonished
ear, grasped his mantle, and rent it in real or feigned horror, exclaim-
ing, "He hath spoken blasphemy." Then rose up also the other
judges who were sitting round him, excited to the highest pitch, each
more eager than the other to put this question to the accused, "Art
thou then the Son of God?" to all of whom there is the same answei
as to Caiaphas, "I am." "What further need then," says the presi-
dent of the court to his brother judges, "have we of witnesses ? No^w
ye have heard his blasphemy. What think ye ?" " What need we,"
they say to him, taking up his own words, " any further witnesses ?
for we ourselves have heard it out of his own mouth." And they
"answered and said, He is guilty of death." See Deut. 13 : 5; 18 : 20.
The unanimous judgment of the court is delivered, (Mark 14 : 64,)
and the sentence of death pronounced.
Is there not one among all those judges within whose heart there
rise some strange misgivings as he dooms this man to die ; not one
whom the calmness, the serenity, the dignified bearing of the Lord,
as he made the great revelation of himself before them, have impress-
ed with wonder and with awe ? Perhaps there is ; but the tumult
of that vehement condemnation carries him away ; or if any inward
voice be pleading for the accused, he quenches it by saying that, if
Jesus really submit to such a sentence being executed upon him, he
cannot be the Messiah, he must be a deceiver; and so he lets the
matter take its course.
The pronouncing of the sentence from the bench was the signal
for a horrible outburst of violence in the hall below. As if all license
was theirs to do with him as they liked ; as if they knew they could
not go too far — could do nothing that their masters would not ap-
prove, perhaps enjoy — the men who held Jesus (Luke 22 : 63) — for it
would seem they could not trust him, bound though he was, to stand
free before them — began to mock him, to buffet him, to spit upon
him, and to cover his eyes with their hands, saying, as they struck at
him, "Prophesy to us who it is that smiteth thee." "And many
other things blasphemously spake they against him." How long all
this went on we know not. They had to wait till the proper hour
arrived for carrying Jesus before the Koman governor, and it was
thus that the interval was filled up ; the meek and the patient One,
who was the object of all this scorn and cruelty, neither answering,
nor murmuring, nor resisting, nor reproaching. There was but one
man in that hall to look with loving, pitying eyes on him who was
being treated thus; and in the words which that spectator penned
long years thereafter in his distant lonely island, we may see some
THE SANHEDRIM. 669
trace of the impression which the sight of the great sufferer made :
"I, John, who also am your brother and companion in tribulation,
and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ."
The malignant antipathy to Christ cherished by the hierarchal
party at Jerusalem had early ripened into an intention to cut him off
by death. It was at the beginning of the second year of his minis-
try that he healed the impotent man at the pool of Bethesda. "The
man departed, and told the Jews that it was Jesus which had made
him whole. And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and seek
to slay him because he had done these things on the Sabbath-day.
But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.
Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only
had broken the Sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, ma-
king himself equal with God."* So far from repudiating this inter-
pretation of his words, Jesus accepted and confirmed it ; enlarging
the scope, without altering the nature of what he had said about the
Father, claiming not only unity in action, but unity in honor with
him. John 5 : 33. So vengeful in their hatred did the Jews of Jeru-
salem become, that Jesus had to seek safety by retiring from Judea.
In the course of the two years which followed, Jesus paid only two
visits to the metropolis, and both were marked by outbreaks of the
same implacable animosity. His appearance in Jerusalem at the
feast of tabernacles excited such an instant and intense spirit of vin-
dictiveness, that one of our Lord's first sayings to the Jews in the
temple was, " Why go ye about to kill me ?" So well known was the
purpose of the rulers, that it was currently said, "Is not this he whom
they seek to kill ? But, lo, he speaketh boldly, and they say nothing
unto him. Do the rulers know indeed that this is the very Christ?"
John 7 : 25, 26. Hearing that such things were said, the rulers sent
their officers to seize him, but failed in the attempt to get him into
their hands. They then confronted him in the temple, and openly
charged him with bearing a false record about himself. A strange
dialogue ensued, in the course of which, instead of retracting any-
thing which he had formerly said, or attempting to explain it away,
Jesus not only exalted himself above Abraham, in whom they boast-
ed, but declared, in language which they could only understand as an
* John 5 : 15-18. When, on a succeeding Sabbath, Christ healed the man
who had a withered hand, tlie Pharisees "were filled with madness, and straight-
way took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him."
Luke 6 : 11 ; Mark 3 : 6. Christ's movements were, from the beginning and
throughout, more regulated by the pressure of the persecution to which he was
exposed, than a cursory reading of the gospel narrative might lead us to imagine,
See John 2 : 24 ; 4:1-3; Mark 1 : 45 ; Luke 5:17; 11 : 53-56.
670 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
assumption by him of Divine prerogatives : " Before Abraham "was, 1
am." So exasperated were they when he said this, that they took up
stones to cast at him ; and had he not made himself invisible, and so
passed through the midst of them, they would, in the heat of the
LDoment, and without troubling themselves about any formal trial,
have inflicted on him the doom of the blasphemer. Having lingered
for a few days longer in the neighborhood of Jerusalem, wrought a
memorable cure on the man born blind, and delivered that memora-
ble discourse which John has preserved to us in the tenth chapter of
his gospel, Jesus again retired from the capital. On his return, two
months afterwards, at the feast of dedication, he was met as he
walked in the temple in Solomon's Porch, and with some show of
candor and anxiety, the question was put to . him, " How long dost
thou make us to doubt? if thou be the Christ, tell us plainly." Jesus
did not tell them so plainly as they desired about his being the
Christ, but he told them plainly enough, as he had done before, that
he was the Son of God. "I," said he, " and my Father are one. Then
the Jews took up stones again to stone him. Jesus answered them,
Many good works have I showed you from my Father: for which of
those works do yo stone me? The Jews answered him, saying, For
a good work we stone thee not, but for blasphemy ; and because that
thou, being a man, makest thyself God." Again our Lord had to
protect himself from the storm of their wrath by retreating to Peraea.
The message from the mourning sisters recalled him from this re-
treat. The raising from the dead of a man so well known as Laza-
rus, in a village so near to Jerusalem as Bethany, produced such an
effect that a meeting of the Sanhedrim was summoned to deliberate
as to what should be done. The design which they had so long
cherished, they now more deliberately than ever determined to ac-
complish : " From that day forth they took counsel together to put
him to death." John 11 : 53.
Though hurried at last in the time and manner of its execution,
it was no hasty purpose on the part of the members of the Jewish
council to put our Lord to death. The proposal of Judas did not
take them by surprise, the arrest in the garden did not find them
unprepared. They must often have deliberated how they should
proceed if they once had him in their hands. And when he was at
last before them for formal trial, and they were eager to get him
condemned, they had not for the first time to consider what charges
they should bring against him, and by what evidence the charges
might be sustained. Witnesses enough of all kinds were within
their easy reach, nor had they any scruple as to the means they took
THE SANHEDRIM. 671
to get from tliem tlie evidence they wanted. But with all theii
facilities, and all their bribery, they could not substantiate a single
charge against Jesus which would justify them in condemning him.
Why, when they found themselves in such difficulty, did they not
summon into their presence some of those who had heard Jesua
commit that kind of blasphemy, upon the ground of which they had
twice, upon the spur of the moment, attempted to stone him to
death ? Testimony in abundance to that effect must have been
lying ready to their hands. It seems clear to us that the first and
earnest desire of the members of the Sanhedrim was to convict
Christ of some other breach of their law, sufficient to justify the
infliction of death; and that it was not till every attempt of this
kind had failed, that, as a last resort, the high priest put our Lord
himself upon his oath. In the form of adjuration which he em-
ployed, two separate questions were put to Christ : the one, Whether
he claimed to be the Christ; the other, Whether he claimed to be
the Son of God. These were not identical. The latter title was not
one which either Scripture or Jewish usage had attached to the
Messiah. The patent act of blasphemy which our Lord was con-
sidered as having perpetrated in the presence of the council was not
his having asserted his Messiahship, but his having appropriated
the other title to himself. When, after Christ had given his first
affirmative reply to the complex challenge of Caiaphas, the other
judges interfered to interrogate the prisoner, they dropped all allu-
sion to the Messiahship. "Then said they all, Art thou then the
Son of God ?" and it was upon our Lord's reassertion that he was —
upon that, and that alone, that he was doomed to death as a blas-
phemer. For it was perfectly understood between the judges and
the judged, that, in thus speaking of himself, Jesus claimed a
peculiar, an intrinsic affinity — oneness in essence, knowledge, power,
and glory, with the Father. His judges took Jesus to be only man,
and looking upon him as such, they were so far right in regarding
him as guilty of blasphemous presumption. In this, then, one of the
most solemn moments of his existence, when his character was at
stake, when life and death were trembling in the balance, Jesus, fully
aware of the meaning attached by his judges to the expression, claimed
to be the Son of God. He heard, and heard without explanation or
remonstrance, sentence of death passed upon him, for no other reason
whatever but his making that claim. On any other supposition than
that of his having been really that which his judges regarded him as
asserting that he was; on any other supposition than that of his true
and proper divinity, this passage of the Redeemer's life becomes worse
672 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
than unmeaning in our eyes. There would be something more hera
than the needless flinging away of a life, by the absence of all attempt
to remove the misconception (if misconception it had been) upon
which the death-sentence had been based. If only a man, if not the
co-eternal, co-equal Son of the Father, in speaking of himself as he
did before that Jewish council, Jesus was guilty of an extent, an
audacity, an effrontery of pretension, which the blindest, wildest,
most arrogant religious enthusiast has never exceeded. The only
way to free his character as a man from the stain of such egregious
vanity and presumption, is to recognise him as the Son of the
Highest. If the divinity that was in him be denied, the humanity
no longer stands stainless.
But we believe in both, and see both manifested in the very
scene that is here before our eyes. Now, with the eye of sense we
look on Jesus as he stands before this Jewish tribunal. It is the
Man of sorrows, despised and rejected of men; treated by those
lordly judges, and the brutal band of servitors, as the vilest of
felons, the very refuse of the earth. Again, with the eye of faith we
look on him, and he seems as if transfigured before us, when, break-
ing the long-kept silence, he declares, "I am the Son of God, and
hereafter ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of
power, and coming in the clouds of heaven." From what a depth of
earthly degradation, to what a height of superhuman dignity does
Jesus at once ascend! And is it not striking to notice how he him-
self blends his humiliation and exaltation, his humanity and divinity,
as he takes to himself the double title, and binds it to his suffering
brow: Tfue Son of man; The Son of God.
OUTLINE STUDIES. 672a
OUTLINE STUDIES.
The beginning of Christ's trial had already shown that there was
to be no observance of right or justice. It had been found impossible
to prove before the Sanhedrim any of the charges brought against him.
At last he had been put under oath, according to the Jewish form, by
Caiaphas and asked whether he was the Messiah and the Son of God;
and only when he himself with the greatest calm and courage answered,
" I am," did his enemies secure the statement upon which they
condemned him to death as a blasphemer.
In the same way the trials before Pilate and Herod are marked by
false accusations on the part of the Jews and almost every degree
of vulgar curiosity, caprice, malfeasance, weakness, cruelty, wrong,
selfishness, and cowardice on the part of these rulers; but through
all the shameful and terrible ordeal Christ remains the same quiet,
silent, dignified, gentle, unperturbed, thoughtful, magnanimous, for-
giving, heroic, and self-forgetting being that he has been. At no
point in his earthly life does his perfect divine-human character shine
out more clearly. It is not strange that Pilate, though at last yielding
to the insatiable hatred and clamor of the Jews, should find no ground
of fault in Jesus, and should seek by every device that can suggest
itself to save him from the death sentence. But there are fatal points
of weakness about the moral nature and position of the procurator,
and at last the Jewish plotters drive him to the point where he delivers
Christ to them to be crucified.
Pilate does not stand out as a wantonly cruel man nor a specially
coarse and tyrannical governor, as Roman administrators then went. He
showed a respect, pity, and even tenderness toward Christ that excites
our wonder. He struggled as few men in his position would have done
to evade the decision to which the Jewish leaders were seeking to drive
him. When one sees his compunctions, his relentings, his hesitations,
his embarrassments, in his repeated attempts to find a way of escape
for himself and for Christ, one cannot but sympathize with him while
still obliged to condemn. For condemn him one must. In the first
place, he was false to his own convictions. He was satisfied that
Christ was innocent, but instead of acting at once and decisively upon
that conviction and setting Christ free, he dallied and parleyed. Again
he showed a shameful degree of vacillation and allowed others to
dictate to him, instead of having a mind of his own. He thus became
the sport of currents of passion, evil motives, and the caprice of the
mob. Then he finally allowed worldly self-interest to predominate
over his sense of duty, and did a wrong never to be undone.
6726 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
PART V. PASSION WEEK TO THE BURIAL.
Study 21. Trials before Pilate and Herod.
(1) Christ's first appearance before Pilate 6726-681
a. The Sanhedrim has adjudged Christ worthy of death 6726
6. But this sentence must be affirmed by the Roman governor 673
c. The Jewish leaders early on Friday bring their case to Pilate.. . . 673-675
d. He requires new ground of action 676, 677
e. The Jews' general charge is sedition 677
/. No adequate case is proven 678
g. Question of Christ's kingship 678-681
(2) Christ's appearance before Herod 681-690
a. The embittered rulers are more vehement in attack 681
b. Christ is notably calm and silent 682
c. Has answered only when questioned by Caiaphas or Pilate as to his
divine Sonship and kingship 682
d. The Jews' allusion to Galilee 683
e. Pilate sends Jesus to Herod 683, 684
/. Herod's treatment of John the Baptist 684-687
g. Idea that Jesus is John risen 687
h. So Herod is pleased to see Christ 687, 688
i. Wishes to see some miracle, to hear some teaching 689
j. Criminal, licentious, curious, Herod finds that the divine voice is
silent 689, 690
k. He and his men of war set Christ at naught 689
(3) Christ's second appearance before Pilate 690-701
a. The thoughts of many hearts are revealed 690, 691
b. Pilate's decision to let Christ be scourged his first great misstep. . 691, 692
c. He next gives choice between release of Barabbas and Jesus 692
d. Jews choose Barabbas and demand that Jesus be crucified 693, 694
e. Pilate washes his hands as if to free himself from guilt 694, 695
/. Christ scourged and mocked 696, 697
g. Pilate presents him, saying, " Behold the man!" 697
h. Pilate's last questions to Jesus, his silence and then his reply 698, 699
i. Final threat of the Jews 699
.;. Pilate's closing decision 699
k. His course and character analyzed. '.', 700, 701
m
IV.
Christ's First Appearance Before Pilate.*
Christ's trial before the Jewish Sanhedrim closed in his convic-
tion and condemnation. The strange commotion on the bench, in
the midst of which the sentence was pronounced, and the outbreak
of brutal violence on the part of the menials in the hall, being over,
there was an eager and hurried consultation as to how that sentence
could most speedily be executed. Had the full power of carrying
^ut their own sentence been in their own hands, there had been no
* Mark 15 : 1 ; Luke 23 • 1 4 ; John 18 : 28-39.
HIS FIRST APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 67£
difficulty; Jesus would have been led out instantly to execution.
But Judea was now under the Roman yoke ; one bond and badge of
its servitude being this, that while the old Jewish courts were per-
mitted to try and to punish minor offences, the final judgment of all
capital offences was reserved for the Roman tribunals. A Roman
judge must pass the sentence, or, at least, must sign the warrant
that consigns the criminal to execution. At Jerusalem, these reserved
cases were brought up for adjudication at the time of the great
festivals, when the Roman procurator, who resided ordinarily at
Csesarea, visited the capital. For the last six years, Pontius Pilate
had held this office in Judea, and he was now in the city on occa-
sion of this passover. His order, therefore, for the execution must
be obtained that forenoon, or perhaps not at all. It was now the
last day before the passover on which a court of justice could be
held; and if not held before six o'clock that evening — when the
passover period began, then not for seven days thereafter. To keep
Christ so long in bonds, awaiting his presentation to the Roman
judge — with an uncertainty, besides, whether Pilate would take up
the case after the passover — were a risk too perilous to run. They
had, indeed, the whole day before them, and there was time enough
to get Pilate's judgment before the passover commenced; but to
keep Jesus not only bound, but bound with the order for his cruci-
fixion hanging over him ; to keep him so for eight days to come : to
keep him so till not only citizens of Jerusalem, but the inhabitants
of the whole region round about, had heard all the particulars of
his apprehension and condemnation — that also were peril which
must, if possible, be avoided. And it could only be avoided by
getting the crucifixion over before that sun which was just about to
rise had set.
Obviously there was urgent need of haste. The consultation,
therefore, was a brief and a hurried one. The resolution was taken
to bind Jesus once more — bind him as men condemned to death
were wont to be bound — and to carry him at once to Pilate, and get
from him the authority to proceed. Thither, therefore, to the official
residence of the procurator, accompanied by the whole multitude
that had assembled in and around the hall of Caiaphas, Jesus is con-
veyed. It is a house which the Gentile has occupied and polluted ;
a house from which the leaven has not been cast out; a house to
cross whose threshold at such a time as this — on the very eve of the
passover — was to disqualify the entrant from all participation in the
holy rite. And, though there be among their number those who,
Ci-om their position and previous acquaintance, might well have
674 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
claimed the privilege of access, and asked a private audience of
Pilate, to explain to him the nature of the case in which his inter-
ference at such an unseasonable hour was required, jet will not one
of these precise, punctilious chief priests, scribes, and councillors
venture into that dwelling, lest they should be denied. They send
in therr message by some of Pilate's officers or servants. At once,
with Eoman courtesy, he comes out to them — to where they are all
standing around the bound and sentenced Jesus. The glance of a
quick eye at once revealed to Pilate the general object of this early
visit. These, he knew, as his eye ran round the leaders of the
crowd, were the Jewish judges, and this, as that eye rested upon
Jesus, some one whom they were anxious to get punished. But why
all this haste ? What can it have been that has brought together,
at. such an unusual hour, all these city magnates, and drawn them as
suppliants to his door? What extraordinary crime can this man,
whom they have borne to him, have committed, that they are so
impatient to see him punished ? He looks at Christ again. He had
tried many; he had condemned many; his practised eye was familiar
with the features which great guilt ordinarily wears, but he had
never seen a great criminal look as this man looks; nothing here
either of that sunk and hollow aspect that those convicted of great
cnirtes sometimes show; nothing here of that bold and brazen front
with which they still more frequently are wont to face their doom :
he looks so gentle, so meek, so innocent, yet so calm, so self-
possessed, so dignified. It does not seem that Pilate knew at first
who this bound one was that now stood before him. He must have
heard something, perhaps much, of Jesus of Nazareth before. He
had been governor of the country all through the years of our Lord's
public ministry, and it could scarcely be but that some report of his
great sayings and doings must have reached his ear; but no more,
perhaps, than Herod had he ever met him — ever seen him face to
face; nor does he yet know that this is he. He only knows and
feels that never has his eye rested upon one more unlike a hardened
reprobate than this. His curiosity roused, his interest excited, the
favorable impression which this first sight of the accused has made,
cooperating with the instinctive and official sense of justice, Pilate's
first words to these judges and heads of the Jewish people are,
"What accusation bring ye against this man?" Was that questiou
put in such a way, was it spoken in such a tone, or accompanied b}
such a look as to convey the idea that he who put it was not at once
ready to believe that any very heinous offence had been committed
by that man ? Perhaps it did carry with it some indication of that
HIS FIRST APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 075
kind. But whether so or not, it indicated this, that Pilate meant to
open up or re-try the case, or, at least, to get at and go over, upon
his own account, the ground of their condemnation ere he ratified it
He could not but know — if he had not been distinctly told by the
messengers whom the Jews sent to him, he saw it plainly enough in
all the attendant circumstances — what it was that these Jews were
expecting him to do. But he will do it in his own way. He will
not sign off-hand, upon their credit and at their bidding, the death
warrant of a man like this. Had ho been a judge of the purest
and strictest honor he would not have signed in such a hurried
way the death-warrant of any one ; but we know it from other
sources, and the Jews who stood before him knew it too, that he was
not such a judge, that he had often condemned without a hearing.
And it is this which inclines us to believe that there was something
in the very first impression that our Lord's appearance made upon
Pilate which touched the better part of his nature, and not only
stirred within his heart the wish to know what it was of which they
accused such a man, but also the desire to ascertain, for his own
satisfaction, whether or not that accusation was well founded.
Obviously, to the men to whom it was addressed, Pilate's ques-
tion was a disappointing one. They did not want, they had not
expected to be summoned thus to adduce and to substantiate some
charge against Jesus, which, in Pilate's judgment might be sufficient
to doom him to death. They had hoped that to save himself the
trouble of investigation, and in compliment to them at this passover
season — a compliment which, when it cost him nothing, they knew
that he was quite willing to pay — he would take their judgment on
trust and proceed upon it. And they still hope so. They will let
Pilate know how good a right they have to expect this service at his
hand ; and how much they will be offended if he refuse it. When the
question, then, is put to them, "What accusation bring ye against
this man?" they content themselves with saying, "If he were not
a malefactor, we would not have delivered him up to thee " — words
of haughtiness and injured pride. 'Do you think that we, the
whole assembled Sanhedrim; we, the very first men in this Jewish
community over which you happen to have been placed; we, who
have come to you, as we are not often wont to do, and are here
before your gates to ask a very easy act of compliance with our
will — do you think that we would have brought this man to 3^011, if
we had not already ascertained his guilt? Do you think that we
would either have ventured to offer such an insult to you, or our-
selves perpetrate such injustice?' A very high tone this to take,
676 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
which they have some hope will yet carry their point for them with
the weak and vacillating governor. They are disappointed. They
have stirred a pride that is equal to their own. If those Jews wont
tell him what kind or degree of criminality it is that they attribute
to this man, he, Pilate, wont put himself as a blind tool into then
hands. ' If it be your judgment, and your judgment alone, that is
to rule this man's case, "Take ye him, then," said Pilate, "and judge
him according to your own law ;" ' — a refusal on Pilate's part to do
the thing which they first hoped that they might get him to do
off-hand; a refusal to countersign their sentence, whatever it was,
and by whatever evidence supported. It was as much as saying,
that so far as he had yet heard or known anything of this case, it
was one which their own law, as administered by themselves, was
quite competent to deal with.
Let them take this man, and judge him and punish him as they
pleased, provided only that they kept strictly within the limits that
their conquerors had laid down. This were wholly to miss their
mark. Their tone changes ; their pride humbles itself. They are
obliged to explain to the governor, what he had known well enough
from the first, but what they had not been candid enough to tell him,
that it was a sentence unto death which they wished to get executed,
a sentence which they were not at liberty to carry out. This deter-
mination of Pilate to make personal inquiry into the grounds of that
sentence, obliged them also to lodge some distinct and specific charge
against Jesus ; one of such a kind that the governor would be forced
to deal with it ; one too of sufficient magnitude to draw dowm upon
it the punishment of death. Now mark the deep hypocrisy and utter
falseness of these men. It wont do now to say that it was soleij T as
a blasphemer, as calling himself the Son of God, that Jesus had
been condemned before their bar. It wont do to let Pilate know
anything of the only piece of evidence upon which their sentence
has been founded. What cares he about that kind of blasphemy of
which Jesus has been convicted? What cares that Roman law, of
which he is the administrator, who or what any man thinks himself
to be, or claims to be, in his relationship with God? Let any Jew
be but a good and faithful subject to Csesar, and, so far as Caesar or
Caesar's representatives are concerned, he may claim any rank he
pleases among the gods. It was necessary, therefore, to draw the
thickest veil of concealment over their own procedure as judges,
although before the examination at this new bar was over, it oozed
out that Jesus had made himself the Son of God — with what strange
effect upon Pilate's mind we shall presently see. But, in the first
HIS FIEST APPEAHAtfCE BEFORE PILATE. P>77
instance, some civil or political offence, some crime against the com-
mon law of the land, must be sought for to charge against Jesus. It
was not easy to find or fabricate such a crime. Our Saviour had
throughout most carefully and cautiously avoided everything like in-
terference or intermeddling with, condemning or resisting, the ordi-
nary administration of law, the policy and procedure of the govern-
ment. He refused to entertain a question about the rights of inher-
it \nce between two brothers, saying to him who sought his interfer-
ence, "Man, who made me a judge or a ruler over you?" These
very men, who are now about to frame their first accusation of him
before Pilate, had tried to get him to pass his judgment upon the
abstract question as to whether it was lawful to pay tribute to Caesar
or not, and had failed in their attempt to entangle him. What con-
cealment, then, what deception, what effrontery of falsehood in it —
and it shows to what extremity they were driven — that when forced
to adduce some specific accusation, they said, "We found this fellow
perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, say-
ing that he himself is Christ a king!" They here bring three dif
ferent accusations against him, not one of which — in that sense in
which alone they desire that Pilate should understand them — they
know is true ; and one of which, the second, they know is absolutely,
and in every sense of it, false. But it suits their object to represent
the accused to Pilate as stirring up sedition, refusing to pay custom,
denying the Koman right to reign over Judea, claiming to be king oi
the country in his own person and of his own right. These, how-
ever, were charges which they knew a Roman governor, whose chief
business in their country was to see that the rights of the emperor
whom he represented should suffer no damage, could not pass by;
charges by no means unlikely to be true, for Judea was at this time
in a most unsettled state. There were multitudes of Jews who ques-
tioned Caesar's right to tax them ; multitudes who regarded him as a
foreign usurper. Give them but a chance of success, and the great
majority of the people would have risen then, as they rose after-
wards, and risked their lives to regain their national liberties. One
thing alone was suspicious — that such an accusation should come
from such a quarter; that those leaders of the Jews should be so
very eager to get a man punished for such a crime. It surely could
not be so mighty an offence in their eyes. They were not themselves
so very loyal to Rome as to be anxious to see an enemy to the Roman
power cut off. Never before, at least, had they displa} r ed any great
zeal in that direction. Pilate had no faith in their sincerity. He
saw through their designs. Perhaps it was now that, for the first
678 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
time, lie recognized that it was with Jesus of Nazareth, of whom he
had heard so much, that he had to do. He did not entertain, be-
cause he did not believe, the charge of his being i seditious and
rebellions subject. But there was one part of the accusation which
was quite new to him, which sounded ridiculous in his ears : that this
poor Nazarene should say that he was a ting, the king of the Jews —
a very preposterous pretension; one sufficient of itself, if there was
any real ground for saying that it ever had actually been set forth, to
suggest a doubt as to whether Jesus was a fit subject for any judicial
procedure whatever being taken against him. Overlooking all else
that had been said against him, Pilate turns to Christ, and says to
him, "Art thou the king of the Jews?" He expected nothing else
than to get an immediate disclaimer of the absurd pretension. To
his surprise, however, Jesus calmly and deliberately replies, "Thou
sayest it — I am the king of the Jews." Very curious this, to hear
such a man, in such a condition, and in such circumstances, speak
in such a way* He must be some egregious, designing, perhaps
dangerous impostor, or, more likely, some wretched, ignorant, half-
mad enthusiast or fanatic. He would like to search a little into the
matter, and find out how it really stood. The man himself would in
all likelihood be the first to supply the clue; he had so willingly
and so calmly answered that first question that he would answer
others. But it would be better to interrogate him alone, away from
these accusers. He might not be so ready to answer further questions
in then* hearing, or they might interfere and prevent Pilate prose-
cuting the inquiry in his own way. He retired therefore to his own
dwelling, into that part of it called and used generally as the judg-
ment hall, and calls upon Christ to follow him. Jesus at once con-
sents. He makes no scruple about crossing that threshold ; lie fears
no contagion from contact with the Gentile ; his passover has been
already held. And now, when they are alone, out of sight and out
of hearing of those Jews, Pilate says again to him in a subdued and
under tone, as of one really anxious to get at the truth, "Art thou the
king of the Jews?"^ Waiving in the meantime anything like a direct
reply, Jesus said to him, " Sayest thou this thing of thyself, or did
others tell it thee of me?" 'Art thou but repeating the words of
others, or art thou asking out of the depths of thine own inquiring
spirit? Hast thou, too, Pilate, felt the inward need of some one to
be the governor and lord of thine unruled, unruly spirit ? Lies there
behind the outward form and meaning of that question of thine, the
indistinct, the inarticulate longing after another king and another
kingdom than either Jews or Romans own ?' Was there, indeed, for
HIS FIRST APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 670
one passing moment, far down in the depths of Pilate's struggling
thoughts, an element of this kind at work ; and did Jesus, knowing
that it was there, try thus to bring it up, that he might proceed to
satisfy it? If so, what a moment of transcendent interest to the
Eoman judge, of which had he but known how to take advantage,
he too might have entered the kingdom, and shared its security
and blessedness ! But he does not, he will not stoop to acknowledge,
what we suspect was true, that there did mingle in the thoughts and
feelings of that moment some element of the kind described. This is
too personal, too bold, too home a question of the Nazarene. The
pride of the Koman, the judge, swells up within his breast, overbear-
ing his eternal interests as a man, a sinner — and so he haughtily
replies: "Am I a Jew? Thine own nation, and the chief priests,
have delivered thee unto me: what hast thou done?" The chance
of reaching the individual conscience of this man has passed away ;
the trial has been made, and it has failed ; Jesus must take up the
question not as one between him and Pilate — between Pilate's con-
science and Pilate's God — but as one simply between himself as a
sentenced criminal, and those Jews without, who are his accusers.
He will not answer the last question of the governor, "What hast
thou done?" upon that he will not enter; it would be of no avail;
but he will satisfy Pilate upon one point. He will convince him that
he has committed no political offence ; that he never meant to set
himself in opposition to any of this world's governments. " My king-
dom," said he, " is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this
world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered
to the Jews; but now is my kingdom not from hence:" 'a king-
dom rising up and extending itself by earthly weapons, by outward
force of any kind, not such is that kingdom which I Jesus call my
own.'
But if noc, what kind of kingdom can it be? what kind of king is
he who rules it ? So far satisfied, yet still wondering and perplexed,
Pilate puts his question, not in its first specific form, but in a more
general one: " Art thou a king then?" 'If not a king like our own
Caesars or your own Herods, if not a king to fight with rival sove-
reigns, or ask thy subjects to fight for thee, then in what sense a
king ?' Our Lord's reply, we can perceive, was particularly adapted
to the position, character, acquirements, experience, of him before
whom he stood — a Roman official of high rank, educated, cultivated;
a man of affairs, of large experience of men — men in different coun-
tries and of different creeds; not given much, perhaps, to any deep
or serious thought about religious matters, yet sufficiently acquaint-
680 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ed with the rival schools of philosophy and religion by which the
then great living Bom an commonwealth was divided and distracted.
Truth, moral truth, religious truth, was the one proclaimed object of
research, of which some were saying, Lo, here it is, and others,
Lo, there it is ; but of which he, Pilate, in pursuit of quite a different
object, had learned to think that neither here nor there nor anywhere
was it to be found. It is to this man that Jesus says, speaking in
the language that w T ould be most intelligible to him : " Thou sayest
that I iftm a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I
into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every
one that is of the truth heareth my voice." As these words fell upon
the ear of Pilate, one can well enough imagine that the current of
his thoughts ran thus : ' It is even as I suspected ; here is another of
these pretenders, who each would have us to believe that he alonw
had discovered the undiscoverable, that he alone had found out and
got exclusive possession of the truth ; here is a new Jewish rival of
those old Stoics of our own, who were ever teaching us that every
wise man was a king — the setter-up of a new system, which he im-
agines is to dethrone every other one that the world before has seen,
whose fancy is that he himself is already upon the throne of his
great kingdom — some poor, egotistical, yet quite harmless enthusiast,
whose day-dream none would wish to break ! One thing, at least, is
clear enough, that it is a quite empty, hollow charge these Jews are
urging here against him. He may sit as long as he likes upon that
ideal throne of his, without the throne of Tiberius being endangered ;
he may get as many subjects as he can to enter that ideal kingdom
of his,' and my master, the emperor, have not a loyal subject the less.'
And so with that passing question to Jesus, "What is truth?"— a
question he does not stay to get answered, as he has no faith that
any answer to it can be given ; a question not uttered sneeringly or
scoffingly, but rather sadly and bitterly, so far as he himself is con-
cerned, having come to regard all truth as a phantom ; and with a
kindly, tolerant, half -pitying, half-envious feeling towards Jesus — with
that question put to Jesus by the way, Pilate goes out to the Jews,
and says to them boldly and emphatically, " I find in him no fault at
all ;" the faultlessness of Christ acknowledged, his kingly claims
scarcely comprehended, and so far as comprehended, rejected, per-
haps despised.
Let each of us now ask himself, How stands it as to me and this
kingdom of the truth, this one great king of the true? Is Jesus
Christ to me the way, the truth, the life ? Does truth, simple, pure,
sternal truth, stand expressed and exhibited to me in those words,
HIS APPEARANCE BEFORE HEROD. 681
those prayers, those acts, those sufferings, that life, that death, of
Jesus Christ? The witness that he bore to the truth, in the living of
that life and the dying of that death, have I listened to it, and be
lieved in it, and submitted to it ? Am I of the truth ; a simple,
humble, earnest seeker after it ; and have I this evidence of my being
so, that I hear the voice of Jesus, hear it and hail it, among all the
conflicting voices that are falling on my ear, as the voice of him who
rightfully claims the lordship of my soul ? Is truth — the truth as to
God, my Creator, my Father, my Redeemer ; the truth as to myself,
what I am, what T ought to be, what I may be, what I shall be — is
this truth not a mere form of sound words, not a mere congeries of
acknowledged or accepted propositions ; but does it stand before me
embodied in the person, the life, the death, the mediation of Jesus
Christ ; and have I enshrined and enthroned him as King and Lord
of my weak, m v sinful, my immortal spirit ?
Christ's Appearance Before Herod.*
Jesus had spoken quite frankly and openly to Pilate when they
were together, out of sight and hearing of the Jews, alone in the
judgment hall. It was quite different when, accompanied by Christ,
Pilate came out again to the attendant crowd, and boldly said to
them, " I find no fault in this man." So far, then, the chief priests
and elders have failed. Failure always embitters. Failure here was
what these men were by no means disposed to submit to. Pilate's
assertion of his belief in the innocence of Jesus only made them the
more vehement in their assertion of his guilt. They became the
more fierce. They accused him, Mark tells us, of many things. But
the waves and the billows of this swelling wrath of theirs broke
harmlessly upon Christ. So absent, so unmoved, so indifferent did
he appear, that it seemed as if he had not heard what they were
saying against him, or hearing had not understood, or understanding
had not heeded. Very different this retirement into himself — this
unruffled composure, this unbroken silence, from those eager and
animated utterances to which the governor had just been listening in
*he hall within. Perhaps it is wounded pride that seals tho lips of
Jesus. To men like these, animated by such a bitter personal hos-
* Matt. 27 : 12, 13 ; Mark C : 14-16 ; Luke 9 : 7-9 ; 13 :31, 32 ; 23 :4-02.
682 THE LITE OF CHEISI.
tility to hhm. exhausting every epithet of vituperation, Leaping upon
him all kinds of charges, Jesus may not condescend to give any
answer. But he has nor treated, will not treat, the Roman governor
in the same way; at least he will surely tell him why it is that he
preserves this silence. Pilate says to him, " Hearest thou not how
many things they witness against thee '?" There is no reply. The
lips are as shut at the question of Pilate as at the accusation of the
Jews. Christ has said all that he meant to say, done all that he
meant to do, so far as those charges were concerned that they were
now bringing against him. He had answered to the Eoman judge
that the kingship which he claimed was not of a kind in any way to
interfere with this world's governments; he had satisfied him of his
perfect innocence as a subject of the state ; and, having done that,
he would say and do no more.
One observes an almost exact parallel as to his silences and his
speakings in our Lord's conduct before the Jewish and the Gentile
courts of justice. In that preliminary unofficial conversation he held
with Annas before the Sanhedrim sat in judgment on his case. Jesus
had spoken without reserve, had answered the high priest's ques-
tions but too fully, and had brought down upon himself the stroke
of the officer who stood by. But when the regular trial commenced,
and charges were formally brought forward, and attempted by many
~ses to be substantiated, Jesus held his peace, so long and so
resolutely, manifesting so little disposition or desire to meddle in any
way with the procedure that was going on, that the high priest rose
from his seat, and put to him a question of the same import with
that which Pilate afterwards put ; and the two questions met with
the very same treatment, to neither of them a single word of reply
was given. But when the high priest rose, and solemnly adjured
Jesus to tell whether he was the Christ the Son of God, just as when
Pilate asked whether he was the king of the Jews, and what kind of
king he was, our Lord made instant and distinct reply. So far as
we can see or understand the principle ruling here the Saviour's con-
duct, determining the time to speak and the time to be silent, it was
that when the matter immediately and directly concerned his
Divine Sonship and Kingship, he will help his judges in every way
he can; nay. he will himself supply the evidence they want. TTpon
that count he will allow himself to be condemned ; he will cooperate
with his enemies in bringing about his condemnation: but of ah
these other lesser charges he will take no account; but leave the
manifold attempts to fasten on him any other kind of charge, to break
down of themselves, that, his enemies themselves being witnesses, it
HIS APPEARANCE BEFORE HEROD. 683
might be solely and alone as the Son of God, the King of Israel,
that he should be convicted, condemned, and crucified.
Among the many things that the chief priests were now accusing
Jesus of in the presence of the governor, hoping still to convince
Pilate that he was not the guiltless man that he had taken him to
be, there was one thing that they put prominently forward, presented
in every form, amplified in every way, on which they mainly relied
in their dealings with Pilate — the setting forth of Christ as a ring-
leader of sedition. "He stirreth up the people," stirreth them up
against the constituted authorities, preaching rebellion through the
whole country, not here in Judea alone, but there also in Galilee
where he began this work. This allusion to Galilee as the birth-
place of the alleged seditious movement may have been accidental;
they may have meant merely thereby to signify how widespread
the evil had been which they were calling upon Pilate to check; or
it may have been done designedly, with that art which was to leave
nothing unsaid or unsuggested, by which the governor could possibly
be influenced. Galilee might have been named by them, to suggest
to Pilate how difficult it was to produce proof of crime committed in
so remote a district ; or to remind him that this Galilee, upon which
so much of Christ's time and labor had been spent, was the chosen
haunt of the resisters of the Koman authority, the cradle of most oi
the seditious plots concocted against the emperor's government; or
they might have known of the bad feeling that there was at this
time between Pilate and the king of Galilee, and might have im-
agined that it would be rather gratifying to Pilate than otherwise to
lay his hand judicially upon one who might be regarded as a subject
of that prince.
However it was, no sooner had the words escaped their lips, than
a happy thought suggested itself to Pilate. He is in great difficulty
with this case ; he knows not how to deal with it. He had never been
so importuned as he now was by those chief priests and elders; he
never saw them more bent on anything than on the death of this
man whom they had brought to him ; it would be easy to give him
up to their vengeance — he had done as much as that before — but he
was convinced of this man's innocence ; there was something too, so
peculiar about his whole look, bearing, and conduct, that he could
not make up his mind to have any share in sending him to b6
executed as a common criminal. But now he hears, that part at
least, perhaps the greater part of the offence alleged against hdni
had taken place in Galilee, in that part of the country which was
not under his jurisdiction, but belonged to that of Herod. This
^
G84 THE LIEE OF CUEIST.
Herod, tlio king of Galilee, happened at this very time to be in Jeru
salem. Pilate will send the case to him ; and thus get the responsi-
bility of deciding it shifted from his own shoulders, by laving it
upon one who not only may be quite willing to assume it, but may
regard as a compliment the reference of the case to his adjudication.
There was a misunderstanding between the two — the Roman pro-
curator and the Galilean king — which the sending of Jesus to the
latter for trial might serve to heal. Pilate had done something to
displease Herod— something, in all likelihood, in the very way of
interfering with what Herod regarded as his rights, and the rights of
his subjects. Some Galileans had been up lately at Jerusalem,
offering sacrifice there. There had been a riot, which Pilate had
promptly and summarily quelled; but in doing so he had mingled
the blood of some of these Galileans with their sacrifices — cut them
down without inquiring whose subjects they were, or what right they
might have to demand a trial in one or other of the Herodian courts.
For this, or some such fancied interference with his jurisdiction,
Herod had taken offence at Pilate. The recognition of his jurisdic-
tion, then, by sending to him for trial such a notorious person tts
Jesus, would be the very kind of compliment most soothing to his
kingly vanity. Herod recognized and appreciated the compliment;
and whatever else Pilate lost by the line of conduct he pursued that
day, he at least gained this — he got the quarrel between himself and
Herod healed.
The happy thought no soonei occurs to Pilate than he acts upon
it. And now, guarded by some Roman soldiers, accompanied by the
whole crowd of his accusers, Jesus is despatched to Herod. To enter
into the scene that follows, we must go back a little upon this Herod's
history. How John the Baptist and he became first acquainted
we are not told. A part of the territory (Persea) over which Herod's
jurisdiction extended, ran down along the eastern shore of the Dead
Sea, and it is probable that it was in some of the circuits that he
made of this district that he first fell in with the Baptist, engaged in
his great ministry of repentance. Herod was greatly struck alike
with the man and with his teaching. There was a strange fascina-
tion about both which drew the attention of the king. As there was
nothing about John's ministry to excite or gratify either the intellect
or the fanc} r — no miracles wrought, no new doctrines propounded, no
vivid picturing employed; as all was so purely moral, so plain, so
pointed, so practical in his teaching, we must believe that what at
first drew Herod to John, and made him listen with such pleasure,
was that it was a faithful portraiture of men that John was drawing.
t*
HIS APPEARANCE BEFORE HEROD. 685
an honest and fearless exposure of their sins lie made. Herod both
admired and approved; but the pleasure that he had in observing
John, and in listening to his instruction, was by no means a pure or
untroubled one. He feared John, we are told, knowing that he was
a just man and a holy. This fear was the fruit of guilt. He knew
and felt what a different man John was from himself. The very
presence of the Baptist was a rebuke, and he was not yet so hard-
ened as to receive that rebuke without alarm. Nor did this first
connection of the king with the Baptist terminate in the mere excite-
ment of certain emotions, whether of respect, or admiration, or fear.
Herod did many things, we are told, at John's bidding. I imagine
that, in the first stage of their intercourse, John dealt with Herod
as he dealt with the Pharisees, and the soldiers, and the publicans;
that he laid his hand upon those open and patent offences of which,
in common with other rulers, Herod notoriously was guilty. The
king not only suffered him to do so, but even went the length of
reforming his conduct in some respects, in obedience to the Baptist's
instructions. But John did not stop there — did not stop where
Herod would have liked ; but, stepping boldly into the inner circle
of his private life, and laying his hand upon the stain which dis-
figured it, he said to him. "It is not lawful for thee to have thy
brother's wife."
In all likelihood Herodias was not with Herod when first he met
the Baptist, and heard him so gladly, and did many things at his
bidding. This meeting mayhave happened in the wilderness, where
Herod ranked but as one of John's large and public audience. But
the king invited the Baptist to his court, and it was there, perhaps in
presence of Herodias, that the rebuke of that particular transgres-
sion was given. Herod's anger was kindled at what appeared an
impertinent and officious intermeddling with his private conduct, his
family affairs. And there was one beside him who resented that
intermeddling still more than he, and was at pains to excite and to
nurse his wrath. Herodias would have made short work of it with
this sharp reprover ; she would have sealed his lips at once in
death, so that she should no more be troubled with their unwelcome
rebukes; and Herod, notwithstanding all his earlier readiness to
hear and to obey, notwithstanding all his respect and regard for
John, would have yielded to her desire ; but he feared the multitude,
and, yielding to that fear, he made a compromise — he cast John
into prison, and kept him there for months. But months could not
quench the thirst for his blood that had been stirred in the heart of
that second Jezebel; still she was asking for the head of the Baptist
686 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
but Herod would not yield — and took no little credit to himself, we
ruay believe, for being so firm. Forgetting that it was the fear of
the multitude that overbalanced the influence of the queen, he might
even have come to persuade himself that he was dealing very gently
and tenderly with the Baptist. But the queen knew him better than
he knew himself, and so with diabolic art contrived the plot that was
to bring another and still weightier fear, to overbalance in its turn
the fear of the multitude.
All went as she desired. The evening for the royal supper came ;
the chief men of Galilee, with the king in high good-humor at their
head, sat down at the banqueting-table. Salome entered, and
danced before them; the guests, heated with wine, broke out into
rapturous applause. In a transport of delight, the king made the
fatal promise, and confirmed it with an oath, that he would give her
whatsoever she should ask. Salome went out to consult her mother
as to what her request should be. There was little time spent in
deliberation. The queen's reply was all ready, for she had conjec-
tured what would occur ; and as Mark tells, Salome came in straight-
way unto the king, and said, " Give me here John Baptist's head
in a charger." The king was taken in the snare ; no time for
thought was given, no way of escape left open. There was the oath
which he had taken; there were the witnesses of that oath around
the board. He could not break his oath without standing dishon-
ored before those witnesses. The fear of the multitude is overborne
by a still higher fear. He gives the order, and the deed is done.
Unhappy man! entangled, betrayed by his own rash vow; his very
sense of honor turned into the instrument that makes him a mur-
derer ! Herod was exceeding sorry ; he knew well how wrong a
thing it was that he was doing; it was with bitter self-reproach that
the order for the execution was given. For a short time there were
the stings of remorse, but these soon lost their power. John was
beheaded, and no manifestation of popular displeasure made. John
was beheaded; Herodias and Salome were satisfied, and Herod must
have felt it a kind of relief to know that, as to him, he should be
troubled by them no more. Remorse died out, but a strange kind of
superstitious fear haunted Herod's spirit. Reports are brought to
him of another strange teacher who has arisen, and to whom all men
are now flocking, as they had flocked to the Baptist at the first.
And Herod says, "John have I beheaded, but who is this of whom I
hear such things?"
"What perplexed him was, that it was said by some that John was
risen from the dead, by some that Elias had appeared, by others
HIS APPEARANCE BEFORE HEROD. 687
that one of the old prophets had arisen. Herod hesitated for a tjjftif*
which of these suppositions he should adopt; but at last he decid/j/i,
and said to his servants, " This is John the Baptist ; he is risen horn
the dead, and therefore mighty works do show forth themselves in
him." He desired to see him; a desire in which there mingled at
first so much of awe and dread, that he rather shunned than courted
an interview; so much so, that when Christ came afterwards into
Galilee, and there was some prospect they might meet, he had in a
very artful way, by working on Christ's fears, persuaded him to
withdraw from that part of the country. He sent some Pharisees,
who said to Jesus, " Get thee out, and depart hence, for Herod will
kill thee." Herod never could have really meditated such a deed.
We know that afterwards when it was in his power, ho declined
taking any part in the condemnation and crucifixion of Oesus. It
was a cunning device to get Herod out of the embarrassments in
which he found that Christ's residence and teaching within his terri-
tory might involve him. And so Jesus seems to have dealt with it,
when he said to the Pharisees, whom he at once recognized as the
agents of the king, "Go," said he, "and tell that fox, Behold, T cast
out devils, and I do cures to-day and to-morrow, and the third day I
shall be perfected" — 'my times and places for working and for
finishing my work, are all definitely arranged, and that quite inde-
pendently of any stratagem of this cunning king.'
At last, at an unexpected time and place, and in an unexpected
way, Jesus is presented to him by Pilate ; presented as a criminal at
the bar, with whom he may use the greatest freedom, as one who
will surely be anxious to say and do all he can in order to obtain his
release. Herod, therefore, when he sees Jesus thus placed before
him, is exceedingly glad — he had heard so much about him, had
desired so long to see him. But now, as indicating at once the state
of mind and heart into which worldliness and levity and licentious-
ness have sunk this man, and as supplying to us the key that
explains our Lord's singular conduct to him, let us particularly notice,
that in the gladness which Herod feels in having the desire to see
Christ thus gratified, there mingles no wish to be instructed, no
alarm of a guilty conscience, no dread of meeting another Baptist to
rebuke him for his iniquities. He has got over whatever compunc-
tion he may at one time have felt. He has quenched the risings ol
remorse within his heart. He has come to be once more on such
good terms with himself; so much at ease, that when he looks at
Jesus, it is with no disturbing remembrances of that bloody head
once brought to him upon a charger — no shrinking dread that he
688 THE LIFE OF CHETST.
may see again the Baptist's form, and hear again the Baptist's
voice. It is with an eager, idle, prurient curiosity — having a tinge,
perhaps, of superstitious wonder in it, that he looks upon Jesus, and
proceeds to question him. As compared with John, this new teacher
had been distinguished by the working of miracles. And if he
wrought them to save others, surely he will do so to save himself.
Herod tries in every way he can think of, to induce him to work
some wonder in his presence. How does Jesus act when addressed
and treated thus by such a man? Shall it be as if the Baptist had
indeed risen from the dead ? Will Jesus seize upon the opportunity
now given, to take up, reiterate, and redouble upon the profligate
prince the rebuke of his great forerunner ? Shall Herod hear it said
to him now, in tones more piercing than ever John employed, It was
not lawful for thee to take the Baptist's life ? Not thus does Jesus
act. Herod puts question after question to him. Jesus looks at
him, but opens not his lips. Herod asks and asks again, that some
sign may be shown, some token of his alleged power exhibited. Jesus
never lifts a finger, makes not a single movement to comply. Herod
is the only one of all his judges whom Jesus deals with in this way—-
the only one before whom, however spoken to, he preserves a con-
tinuous and unbroken silence. It does not appear that, from the
time when he was presented to Herod, to the time when he was
sent away from him, a single word ever passed the Saviour's lips.
That deep and death-like silence, the silence of those lips which
opened with such pliant readiness when any word of gentle entreaty
or hopeful warning was to be spoken, how shall we interpret it ? Was
it indignation that sealed those lips ? Would Christ hold no inter-
course with the man who had dipped his hands in such blood as that
of the Baptist? Did he mean to mark off Herod as the one and only
man so deeply stained with guilt that he will not stoop to exchange
with him a single word ? It had been human this, but not divine ;
and it is a divine meaning that we must look for in this dread and
awful silence. There lived not, there breathed not upon the earth
the man, however steeped in guilt, from whom that loving Saviour
would have turned away, had but the slightest sign of penitence been
shown, the slightest symptom of a readiness to listen and be saved.
It was no bygone act of Herod's life that drew down upon him the
doom oi that silence — though doom it little seemed to him to be ; it
was the temper and the spirit of the man as he stood there before the
Lord, after all that he had passed through ; it was that which did it.
Why, the very sight of Jesus, connected, as he knew or fancied him
to be in some mysterious way with John, should have been to Herod
HIS APPEARANCE BEFORE HEROD. 689
as though one risen from the dead had actually appeared in his pres-
ence. It was he, not Jesus, that should have been speechless when
they met; or, if he spake at all, it should have been to ask whether,
in that world of spirits from which Christ came, there was mercy for
a sinner such as he. But, instead of this, instead of anything like
this, instead of deep or earnest or anxious feeling of any kind, there
is nothing but a vainglorious wish to have some talk with this strange
man, with whose name and fame all the country has been ringing, the
cravings of an empty curiosity, the thirst for some showy exhibition
of knowledge or of power. Let not that man think that he shall hear
anything of the Lord. Christ could have spoken such a word as
Herod never would have liked to hear again ; he could have wrought
snch a miracle as would have turned the curiosity of the king into
terror, his pride into abasement. But he is now to reap the fruit of
his own doings, and that fruit is even this, that he is left unspoken to
by the Lord from heaven. This silence, had he but interpreted it
aright, was perhaps the very thing most fitted to speak homo to his
conscience and his heart. But he did not understand it, did not
enter into the reason of it, never thought of his own past conduct,
his own present character, as the cause of it; it stirred him to no
inquiry, it awakened in him no remorse. The only feeling that it
appears to have produced was irritation ; the irritation of mortified
vanity. Greatly galled, yet in no way softened, when he could make
nothing of this mysterious man, who mantled himself in such obsti-
nate silence, he and his men of war found nothing else to do than to
set Christ at naught, and mock him, and array him in a white robe,
and send him back to Pilate,
A wonderful instance this of the onward, downward course of
crime, particularly of that peculiar course of crime, levity, and licen-
tiousness which Herod had pursued ; an instance how speedily and
how thoroughly a human heart may harden itself against reproof,
quench its convictions, get over its fears, and bring down upon itself
that doom, than which there is none more awful: "Ephraim is joined
to his idols ; let him alone." To be left utterly and absolutely alone
to have all the voices that speak to us of God and duty, the voice ot
conscience from within, the voice of providence from without, the
voice which comes from the lips of Jesus — to have all these voices
hushed, hushed into an unbroken, perhaps eternal stillness; can one
conceive any condition of a human spirit sadder or more awful? Yet
this is the very condition to which the abuse of opportunity, the
indulgence of passion, the drowning of the voices when they do speak
to us, are naturally and continually tending.
Uf« of Christ 44
690 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
My young friends, let me entreat you especiahy to take a double
warning from such a case as this : 1st, Beware how you deal with
your first religious convictions; tremble for yourselves if you find
them dying by a slow death, as the withering, hardening spirit of
worldliness creeps in upon your soul, or perishing suddenly amid the
consuming fires of some burning passion. They tell us that there is
no ice so close and hard as that which forms upon the surface which
once was thawed ; and there is no hardness of the human spirit so
great as that which forms over hearts that once had melted. And,
2d, Beware of hot fits of enthusiasm, in which you go farther in pro-
fession than you are prepared to go in steady and sustained practice.
Herod went too far at first, and got himself involved among obliga-
tions and restraints from which, when the hour of temptation came,
he flung himself free by an effort which damaged his moral and spir-
itual nature more than it had ever been damaged before ; his revul-
sions from religion all the greater on account of the temporary and
partial, but hollow and merely emotional entertainment that he had
given to its claims. What you do, do it with all your heart ; for it is
good to be zealously affected in a good thing ; but do it intelligently,
calmly, deliberately, as those who know and feel that it is the great-
est of all transactions that you engage in, when it is with God and
for your soul's eternal welfare that you transact.
VI.
Christ's Second Appearance Before Pilate.*
"This child," said good old Simeon, as he took up the infant Jesus
into his arms to bless him — " this child is set for the fall and rising
again of many in Israel ; and for a sign that shall be spoken against ;
that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed." Never were
those words more strikingly fulfilled than in these closing scenes of
the Saviour's life which we are now engaged in tracing. Then many
fell — those forsaking, despairing disciples of Jesus — but fell to rise
again; then was that sign set up, against which so many shafts of so
many kinds were launched ; and then were the thoughts c f many
hearts revealed — among others those of Judas, and Peter, and Caia-
phas, and Herod, and Pilate — revealed by the very closeness of their
* Luke 23 : 13-16 , Malt. 27 : 15-23 ; Luke 23 : 20-23 ; Matt. 27 : 26-30 ; John
19:1-10.
HIS SECOND APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 691
contact with Christ, by the peculiarity of those relationships to hire
into which they were then thrown. Just now our attention was
concentrated upon Herod; to-day let us fix our eyes on Pilate, and,
taking him up at that stage where we left him, let us try to under-
stand and to follow the working of his thoughts and feelings during
those two hours of their earthly lives in which he and Jesus had to
do with one another — he in the character of judge, Jesus in the char-
acter of one accused and condemned by the Sanhedrim.
You will remember that when first he heard, among the other
accusations which the high priests lodged against him, that Jesus had
said that he himself was Christ a King — struck at once with the sin-
gularity of the pretension, and with the appearance of the man who
made it, Pilate called on Christ to follow him into the inner hall of
his residence ; that there, when alone with him, omitting all reference
to any other charge, he asked him particularly about this one; that
Christ fully satisfied him as to there being nothing politically danger-
ous or offensive in the claim to a kingdom which he had put forth;
that, bringing Christ out along with him to the Jews, he had said at
once and decidedly, "I find no fault in this man;" and that then.,
taking advantage of a reference to Galilee, he had sent Jesus off to
Herod, to see what that Galilean king and judge might think and do.
In this way he hoped to be relieved from the painful and embarrass-
ing position in which he felt himself to be placed.
He was disappointed in this hope. Jesus was sent back to him
by Herod; sent back without any judgment having been pronounced;
sent back in such a way as to indicate that Herod as well as he made
light of this poor Galilean's pretension to be a king — thought it, in
fact, more a matter for mockery and ridicule than for serious judicial
entertainment. Although a considerable body of the high priests
and of the people had accompanied Jesus to and from the bar of
Herod, yet in that interval there had been to some extent a scatter-
ing of the crowd. Pilate, therefore, called together afresh the chief
priests, and the rulers, and the people — the latter particularly men-
tioned, as Pilate had now begun to think that his best chance of
gaining the end upon which his heart was set — the deliverance of
Christ out of the hands of his enemies — would be by appealing, over
the heads of their rulers, to the humanity of the common people.
When all, then, were again assembled, he made a short speech to
them, reiterating his own conviction of Christ's innocence, confirming
it by the testimony of Herod, and closing by a proposal that he hoped
would be at once accepted — "I will therefore chastise him, and release
him." But why, if he were innocent, chastise him at all ? Why noi
692 THE LIFE OF CHRIST
at once acquit the culprit, and send him away absolved from the bai
of Roman judgment ? It was a weak and unworthy concession, the
first faltering of Pilate's footstep. He cannot but say that he has
found nothing worthy of death in this man ; he is himself thoroughly
satisfied that there is nothing in him worthy of any punishment; but
it will please his accusers, it will conciliate the people, it may open
the way to their readier acquiescence in his after-dismissal, to inflict
on him some punishment, a proposal not dictated by any spirit of
cruelty, springing rather from the wish to protect Jesus from the
greater penalty, by inflicting on him the less ; yet one that weakened
his position, that made those sharp-sighted Jews at once perceive
that he could be moved, that he was not ready to take up and stand
firmly and fixedly upon the ground of Christ's innocence. In defer-
ence to them, he has gone so far against his own convictions; he may
go farther. He has yielded the inch ; they may force him to yielc 1
the ell. The proposal, therefore, of chastising Jesus, and letting hin.
go, is rejected, and rejected so as to throw Pilate back upon sorat
other, some new device.
He recollected that at this time of the passover it was a custom-
ary thing, in compliment to the great assembly of the Jews in their
metropolis, for the procurator to arrest in a single instance the ordi-
nary course of justice, and to release whatever prisoner the people
might ask to be given up. He recollected at the same time that
there was a notable prisoner, who then lay bound at Jerusalem, one
Barabbas, who for sedition and murder had been cast into prison ;
and the idea occurred to Pilate that if — instead either of asking them
broadly and generally who it was that they wished him to release, or
whether they would let him choose for them and release Jesus — he
narrowed in this instance the choice, and presented to them the
alternative of taking Barabbas or Jesus, they could scarcely fail to
choose the latter. To give the greater effect to this proposal Pilate
ascended the movable rostrum or judgment-seat, which stood upon
the tesselated pavement that ran before the vestibule of the palace,
and addressing himself to the multitude, said to them, " Whom will
ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus who is called
Christ?"
While waiting their answer, a message was brought to him, the
messenger having been instructed to deliver it immediately, wherever
he was, and however he might be engaged. It came from his wife ;
was distinct and somewhat authoritative, "Have thou nothing to do
with that just man, for I have suffered many things this day in a
dream because of him." Pilate's wife was not a Jew, nor did sh*
HIS SECOND APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 693
mix much with the common people of the land. That she should
have learned so much of Jesus as to think and speak of him as " that
just man " — that she should have been so much concerned when she
heard that her husband had been asked to try him, as to take this
uncommon step of sending a warning to him on the judgment-seat —
may be regarded as a proof how widespread and how deep the im-
pression was that Christ had made.
The time occupied by the hearing and considering this message—
whose warning knell rung in strange harmony with the alarm that
was already pealing in Pilate's spirit — gave to the chief priests and
the rulers the opportunity they were so quick to seize, to prompt the
crowd as to the answer they should give to Pilate's proposal. We do
not know what kind of stimulants were employed upon this occasion ,
but we all do know what a flexible, impressible, excitable thing a
city mob is, when composed, as this one mainly was, of the lowest of
the people ; and we can at least easily conjecture what the firebrands
were which the expert hands of the priesthood threw in among that
mob, inflaming its passions to the highest pitch, and giving the bum
ing mass into their hands, to be directed as they desired. Recovered
a little from the disturbance which his wife's message cost him, Pilate
turns again to the people, and says to them, " Which of the two, then,
will ye that I release unto you ?" They say, "Barabbas." Surprised
and annoyed at the reply, almost willing to believe there has been
some mistake, he puts it to them in another form : " Will ye that I
release unto you the King of the Jews?" using the epithet, in the
belief that they, as well as he, will look upon its claimant more as an
object of pity than of condemnation. But now they leave him in no
doubt as to what their will and pleasure is: "Away with this man,"
they all cry out at once, " and release unto us Barabbas !" " What
shall I then do with Jesus, which is called Christ?" This weak and
almost pitiful asking of them what he should do, ends, as all such
yielding to popular prejudices, cringing to popular passions, ever
does ; it makes the multitude more confident, more imperious. The
governor has put himself into their hands, and they will make him
do their will. "What shall I- do, then, with Jesus?" "Let him be
crucified !" they say. Crucified ! It is the first time the word has
been named in Pilate's hearing, the first time they tell him articu-
lately what it is they desire to have done with Jesus. Crucify him —
give up to that worst and most ignominious of all deaths this meek
end gentle man, who he is sure has done no wrong; whom he sees
well enough that the chief priests seek to get rid of from some reli-
gious antipathy that they have taken against him : can the people
694 THE LIFE OF GHEIST.
mean it ? He had fancied, whatever the chief priests thought, that
tlieij had a different feeling towards him. " Why," in his surprise he
says to them, "what evil hath he done?" But this now excited and
uproarious crowd is far past the point of answering or arguing with
the governor. Its one and only cry is, "Let him be crucified!"
Twice Pilate asks them to tell him what crime he had committed,
that they should doom him to a felon's death. He gets but that cry
repeated, with louder, angrier voice. Yet a third time — clinging to
the hope that he may still succeed in extricating Jesus from their
grasp, without putting himself entirely wrong with them — he puts the
query, " Why, what evil hath he done ?" and gathering up a little
strength, as if he were determined to take his own way, and act upon
the suggestion that he had thrown out a few moments before, he adds,
" I have found no cause of death in him. I will therefore chastise
him, and let him go." The very mention of letting him go stirs the
crowd to a tenfold frenzy, and now the voices of the chief priests them-
selves are heard swelling and intensifying the cry, "Crucify him!
crucify him !"
Before a storm like this who can stand ? He has done — so Pilate
thinks — the most he can. If he go farther, he will raise another city
tumult which it will cost many lives to quell, and the quelling o/
which by force may expose him to the very same charges of tyranny
and cruelty which, upon more than one occasion of the kind before,
had actually been transmitted to Home against him, and drawn down
upon him the rebuke and displeasure of the emperor. The yielding
is but the sacrifice of a single life, which may be made without in-
volving the governor in any danger. But the resisting; who can tell
in what that might land ? Still, however, he is not at ease. He him-
self scarce knows the reason why; but somehow he never saw the
man whose blood he would like so ill to have resting upon him as the
blood of Jesus. The private interview they had together in the hall
had raised some strange misgivings in Pilate's heart. What is it
about this man that has given him so strong a hold upon Pilate, and
makes him struggle so hard to get him released? Pilate himself
could not have told ; but even now, though he has at last resolved to
give him up, he will not, cannot do it without trying in somo way to
throw off his shoulders the responsibility of his death. "When
Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but rather that a tumult
was made, he took water and washed his hands before the multitude,
saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person : see ye to it
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on
our children." And he delivered Jesus to their will.
HIS SECOND APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 695
Now, let us pause a moment here in the narrative to mark the
inner workings of conscience and of humanity in the heart of Pilate.
Ct seemed an ingenious device to give the people their choice. It
was resorted to from a desire on his part to rescue Jesus. It would
gain, as it first seemed to him, a double object — it would prevent the
Jews from saying that he had screened a seditious man, and yet it
would rescue an innocent one from death. But to what did it
amount? It proceeded on the assumption that Christ was guilty; it
asked that as one righteously condemned, he might by an act of
grace be released. There lay one fatal flaw in the proposition. But,
still worse, it put the matter out of Pilate's hands into those of the
people. It was a virtual renunciation on Pilate'? part, of the rights
and prerogatives of the judge. And by thus denuding himself of his
own proper official position, Pilate put himself at the mercy of a
fickle and infuriated populace, and gave them that hold and power
over him which they so mercilessly employed.
This crying out, "Crucify, crucify him!" as contrasted with the
hosannas that a few days before had greeted Christ's entrance into
Jerusalem, has been often quoted to prove how rapid the changes in
popular sentiment sometimes are, how little a multitude can be trust-
ed. But was it the same crowd which raised the hosannas of the
one day, that uttered the "Crucify him, crucify him!" of the other?
I rather think that had we been present upon both occasions, and
intimately acquainted with the inhabitants of Jerusalem, we should
have seen that the two crowds were differently constituted ; and that,
however true it may be that tides of public feeling often take sud-
denly opposite directions, this can scarcely be quoted as an instance
exactly in point.
But very curious is it to mark the expedient to which Pilate had
recourse, in that public washing of his hands. He delivers Jesus up
to be crucified. Therein lay his guilt ; he might and should have
refused to become a party to his crucifixion. Believing Jesus to be
innocent, to give him up to death was to take a large share of the
criminality upon himself. And yet he thinks that when he gets the
Jews to take it upon them, he has relieved himself, if not entirely,
yet in great measure, of the responsibility. He regards himself as
one coerced by others; and when these others are quite willing to
take on themselves the entire weight of the deed, he imagines that
this will go a great length in clearing him. And if ever placed under
strong compulsion from without, urged on to a certain course of con-
duct which in our conscience we disapprove, we yield, and in yield-
ing take comfort to ourselves from others saying that they are quite
696 THE LIFE OF CHPwIST.
ready to incur the whole responsibility of the affair, then let ns re-
member that we are acting over again the part of Pilate; and that
just as little as that outward washing of his hands did anything to
clear him of the stain he was contracting, so little can we hope that
the guilt contracted by our being a consenting and cooperating party
in any deed of injustice or dishonor, may be thus mitigated or wiped
away.
Pilate has given up Jesus to the will of the multitude : given him
up to be crucified. The judge's work is done; there remains only
the work of the executioner. Over that it is no part of the procura-
tor's office to preside. Why, then, does Pilate not withdraw ? We
might have thought that, wearied with his conflict with the rabble,
and oppressed with painful feelings as to its issue, he would have
been only too glad to retire — but he cannot ; a singular fascination
still binds him to the spot — perhaps the lingering hope that he may
yet succeed in rescuing the victim from his bloodthirsty enemies. He
hands Christ over to his soldiers, to have that scourging inflicted
which was the ordinary precursor and preliminary to crucifixion. It
might not be difficult from the narratives of eye-witnesses to give
you some idea of what a military scourging was, what kind of instru-
ment they used in it, what kind of wounds that instrument made,
what terrible torture was inflicted, to what length that torture was
often carried ; but we would rather have a veil drawn over the purely
physical sufferings of our Saviour, than have them pressed promi-
nently upon our eye. We recoil from the attempts so often made to
excite a sympathetic horror by vivid details of our Lord's bodily suf-
ferings. We feel as if it were degrading him to present him in that
character, in which so many, equal nay superior in their claims upon
our sympathy, might be put beside him.
But the scourging did not satisfy the rude and brutal soldiers
who had got Christ into their hands. As Ptomans, these men knew
little, cared little about any kingship that Christ might claim. With
them it could not be, as with the Jews, a subject of religious hate or
scorn. It was a topic alone of ribald mh'th, of Gentile mockery.
This Koman cohort takes the hint that Herod's men of war had given
them; who had thrown a white robe over Jesus, clothing him with
something like the garment that their own kings wore, that they
might set at naught his vain pretensions to be a king. And now,
when the scourging is over, these Roman soldiers will outdo their
Jewish comrades; they will make a more perfect pantomime of this
pool Galilean's royalty. They take some old military cloak, of the
*aine color with the robes of their emperors; they throw it over his
HIS SECOND A1TEAKANCE BEFOEE PILATE. 697
bloody shoulders ; they plait a crown of thorns, and put it on his head
they thrust a reed, as a mock sceptre into his right hand ; and then,
when they have got hhn robed, and crowned, and sceptred thus,
they bow the knee, and hail him as a king. But they tire even of
that mock homage ; the demon spirit that is in them inspires the
merriment with a savage cruelty ; and so, as if ashamed even of that
kind of homage they had rendered, they snatch impatiently the reed
out of his hand, and smite with it the crown of thorns, and drive it
down upon his pierced and bleeding brow, and spit upon him, and
smite him with their hands.
All this is done in an inner court or guard-room, out of sight of
the crowd that is still waiting without. Pilate sees it all; makes no
attempt to mitigate the suffering or the mockery; is absorbed in
wonder as he gazes upon Jesus — such a picture of silent, gentle,
meek, unmurmuring, uncomplaining patience ! standing there, and
taking all that treatment as though no strange thing were happening,
as if he had expected all, were prepared for all, found no difficulty
in submitting to all. There is no weakness in that patience ; but a
strength, a power, a dignity. The sight moves Pilate's heart: it
would move any heart, he thinks ; may it not move even the hearts
of those people without ? may it not satisfy their thirst for vengeance
to see the suffering Jesus reduced to such a pitiable plight as this ?
He will try at least what the sight can do in the way of stirring such
sympathy. He goes forth, with Jesus following, and says to the
multitude, "Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that
I find no fault in him ;" then, turning and pointing to Jesus, as he
stood wearing still the purple robe and the crown of thorns, bearing
on his face and person the marks of all the sufferings and indignities
of the guardhouse, Pilate says, "Behold the man -3" 'behold and
pity, behold and be satisfied — behold, and suffer me, now that 1 have
thus chastised him, to let him go !' Alas ! he knew not the intensity
of such fanatic hatred as that which those high priests and rulers
cherished, and had, for the time, infused into the obedient crowd ;
how it quenches every impulse of kindliness in the human heart, and
nerves the human hand for deeds of utmost cruelty. That sight to
which he points, instead of moving any pity, only evokes fresh out-
breaks of ferocious violence; with unabated breath, the same wild
cry from every side salutes the ear of the governor, " Crucify him,
crucify him !" It not only disappoints, it j)rovokes Pilate to be baf-
fled thus again, and baffled by such a display of immovable and un-
appeasable malignity. " Take ye him and crucify him," he says ;
1 crucify him as best you can, but do not expect that I shall counto-
r
698 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
nance the deed by any countersigning of your sentence in condemning
the man, as if I thought he deserved to die — take ye him and crucify
him, for I find no fault in him.'
But the yielding governor is not in this way to slip out of their
hands ; he, too, must be a party ; and now, at last, they tell him what
hitherto they had concealed — to show him that theirs was not such a
groundless sentence as he imagined it to be — " We have a law," they
said, " and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the
Son of God." It is impossible to say what ideas that phrase, " the Son
of God," excited in the mind of Pilate. He was familiar with all the
legends of the heathen mythologies, which told of gods and demigods
descending and living upon the earth. Like so many of the educated
Romans of his day, he had thrown off all faith in their divinity, and
yet somehow there still lingered within, a faith in something higher
than humanity, some beings superior to our race. And what if this
Jesus were one of these ! never in all his intercourse with men had
he met one the least like this, one who looked so kinglike, so God-
like : kinglike, Godlike, even there as he now stands with a robe of
faded purple and a crown of plaited thorns. Never in kingly gar-
ments, never beneath imperial crown, did he see a sceptred sovereign
stand so serene, so dignified, so far above the men that stood round
him. Whatever the ideas were which passed through Pilate's mind
when he heard that Jesus had made himself the Son of God, they
deepened that awe which from the first had been creeping in upon
and taking possession of his spirit; he was the more afraid. Once
again, therefore, he takes Christ apart, and says to him, " Whence art
chou?" 'In that first interview, you told me that your kingdom was
not of this world, but whence art thou thyself ? art thou of this earth,
I mean like the rest of us, or art thou other than thou seemest —
comest thou indeed from heaven?' But Jesus gave him no answer.
Of all the silences of our Lord that day, of which this in number was
the fifth, it seems the most difficult to understand. Was it that
Pilate, by the way in which he had then put the question, " What is
truth?" without pausing for a reply, had forfeited his right to an
answer now? Was it that Pilate was wholly unprepared to receive
the answer; that it would have been a casting of pearls before swine
to have told him whence Jesus was? Was it that the information,
had it been given, while ineffectual to stop his course, might have
aggravated Pilate's guilt, and therefore, in mercy, was withheld?
We cannot tell; but we can perceive that the very silence was in it-
self an answer; for, supposing Jesus had been a mere man, had
come into this world even as we all come, would he, had he been sin-
HIb SECOND APPEARANCE BEFORE PILATE. 699
cere and upright, have hesitated to say whence he came ? would he
have allowed Pilate to remain in doubt? would he have suffered him,
as his question evidently implied, to cherish the impression that he
was something more than human? We can scarcely think he would,
By his very silence, therefore, our Lord would throw Pilate back upor
that incipient impression of his Divine origin, that it might be con-
firmed and strengthened in his breast.
But here again, even as in the first interview, the haughtiness of
the man comes in to quench all deeper thought. Annoyed by this
silence, this calmness, this apparent indifference of Jesus, Pilate, in
all the pride of oflice, says, " Speakest thou not to me ; knowest thou
not that I have power to crucify thee, and power to release thee ?" —
a very idle attempt to work upon the mere selfish fears of Christ ; — a
question that brings a speedy answer, one in which rebuke and sym-
pathy, are singularly blended: "Thou couldest have no power against
me, except it were given thee from above." * That power of thine, to
crucify me or release, which I do not dispute, which thou mayest ex-
ercise as thou pleasest — do not think that it is a power original,
underived, independent. Thou hast it, thou exercisest it but as
Heaven permits; thou little knowest, indeed, what thou doest; it is
as a mere holder of the power that thou art acting, acting at others'
bidding; therefore, that Jewish judge, who knowing far better at
least than thou what it was he did, and who it was that he was giving
up to death* — "therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the
greater sin." There is something surely very impressive here; that,
sunk as Jesus was beneath the weight of his own sufferings — suffer-
ings so acute that they well might have engrossed his thoughts and
feelings, he yet so calmly weighs in the judicial balance the compa-
rative guilt of the actors in this sad scene, and excuses, as far as he
is able, the actings of Pilate. It had something of its proper effect
upon the procurator. Instead of diminishing, it but increased the
desire he already had to deliver him. He tried again; tried with
still greater earnestness to effect his object. But again he failed, for
now the last arrow in that quiver of his adversaries is shot at him :
" If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend ; whosoever
maketh himself a king, speaketh against Caesar." Pilate knew that
already he stood upon uncertain ground with the imperial authori-
ties ; he knew that a fresh report of anything like unfaithfulness to
Caesar would cost him his oflice. The risk of losing all that by occu-
pying that oflice he had hoped to gain, he was not prepared to face,
and so, yielding to this last pressure, he gives way, and delivers up
Jesus to be crucified.
700 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Now, let us look a moment at the faults and at the rirtues of this
man. The fact that it fell to his lot to be governor of Jndea at this
time, and to consign the Saviour to the cross, inclines us to form ex-
aggerated notions of his criminality. He was not, let us believe, a
worse governor than many who preceded and who followed him in
that office. We know from other sources that he frequently showed
but little regard to human life — recklessly, indeed, shed human blood,
when the shedding of it ministered to the objects of his ambition ;
but we have no reason to believe that he was a wantonly cruel man,
or a particularly oppressive and tyrannical governor, as governors
then went. His treatment of Christ was marked by anything but a
contempt for justice and an absence of all human feeling. He show-
ed a respect, a pity, a tenderness to Jesus Christ that, considering
the little that he knew of him, excites our wonder. He struggled
hard to evade the conclusion to which, with such unrelenting malig-
nity, the Jewish leaders drove him. No other king, no other ruler
with whom Christ or his apostles had to do, acted half as conscien-
tiously or half as tenderly as Pilate did. Herod, Felix, Agrippa —
compare their conduct in like circumstances with that of Pilate, and
does he not in your estimate rise superior to them all? There is
something in the compunctions, the relentings, the hesitations, the
embarrassments of Pilate — those reiterated attempts of his to find
a way of escape for himself and for Christ, that takes a strong
hold upon our sympathy. We cannot but pity, even while forced
to condemn. Condemn, indeed, we must ; for —
1. He was false to his own convictions; he was satisfied that
Christ was innocent. Instead of acting at once and decidedly upon
that conviction, he dallied and he parleyed with it; sought to find
some way by which he might get rid of that clear and imperative
duty which it laid upon him ; and by so doing he weakened and un-
settled this conviction, and prepared for its being overborne.
2. He exhibited a sad degree of vacillation, inconsistency, inde-
cision. Now he throws all blame upon the priests : " I am innocent
of his blood : see ye to it." Again he takes the entire responsibility
upon himself: "Knowest thou not that I have power to crucify thee,
and power to release?" Now he pronounces Jesus innocent, yet with
the same breath proposes to have him punished as guilty : now he
gives him up, and then he has recourse to every kind of expedient to
rescue. Unstable as water, he does not, he cannot succeed.
3. He allowed others to dictate to him. Carelessly and inconsid-
erately he submits that to their judgment which he should have kept
wholly within his own hold. He becomes thus as a wave of the sea,
OUTLINE STUDIES. 701
as a feather in the air, which every breeze of heaven bloweth about
as it listeth.
4. He allowed worldly interest to predominate over the sense ol
duty. Such was the plain and simple issue to which it came at last :
Do the thing he knew was right — acquit the Saviour — do that, arid
run all risks; or do the thing he knew was wrong — do that, and
escape all danger. Such was the alternative which was at last pre-
sented to him. Alas for Pilate ! he chose the latter. But let each of
us now ask himself, Had I been placed exactly in his position, with
those lights only to guide me that he then had, should I have acted
a better and bolder part ? We may think and hope we should ; but
in thinking so and hoping so, let us remember how often, when con-
science and duty pointed in the one direction, and passion and self-
interest pointed in the other, we have acted over and over again the
very part of Pilate ; hesitated and wavered, and argued and debated,
and opened our ears to what others told us, or allowed ourselves to
be borne away by some strong tide that was running in the wrong
direction. Nay more, how often have we, knowing as we do, or pro-
fess to do, who Christ was, whence he came, what he did for us, and
whither he has gone — how often have we given him up into unfriendly
hands, to do with him what they would, without even the washing of
our own hands, or the saying what we thought of him.
OUTLINE STUDIES.
In this lesson come the last scenes in the passion of our Lord.
Jesus is now delivered into the hands of officers to be led forth to the
place of execution. This is probably the place outside the city wall,
to the north of Jerusalem, and but a short distance away.
But during the progress to Calvary Jesus falls under the burden
of the cross, and Simon the Cyrenian is made to bear it. Yet this
then unwilling service may have resulted in his becoming a Christian.
The weeping of the women is to be noted, and Christ's words to
them indicating the sorrows that are to come to them and their chil-
dren in the destruction of Jerusalem.
When the place of execution is reached, the soldiers strip Jesus
and nail him to the cross, after which it is erected. They then divide
his garments among them and cast lots for the vesture woven from the
top throughout. Pilate's title is affixed above his head— that he is
king of the Jews — and in spite of protest it stands.
Rising superior to pain, Christ prays the Father to forgive those
701a THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
who are causing his death. Among the mocking sayings of the passers-
by is one notable for its spiritual and redemptive import — " He saved
others, himself he cannot save."
One of the malefactors crucified with him catches the spirit of these
taunts, and voices his own reproaches; but the other, rebuking him,
says, " Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom,"
and meets with the sublime response, " To-day shalt thou be with me
in paradise."
To his mother, standing near his apostle John, he says, " Woman,
behold thy son," and to John, " Son, behold thy mother," thus ten-
derly making provision for her whose sorrow is perhaps profounder
than that of any other in the group of loving hearts about the cross.
Now a strange darkness gathers about the scene, perhaps, first, a
symbol of nature's anguish, and, second, typical of the deep darkness
caused by the world's sin enshrouding the soul of our Lord, so that he
cries in his agony, " My God, my God! why hast thou forsaken me? "
At the ninth hour the darkness clears away, and the atoning suf-
ferer expires in unclouded light with the words just uttered, "It is
finished," and " Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit."
The phenomenon which the apostle John records, that when the
spear of the soldier pierced the side of Christ there flowed out water
and blood, together with the fact that our Lord so soon expired, leads
to the conclusion that under the strain of his soul-anguish more than
that of the body his heart was broken, fulfilling the words, " Reproach
hath broken my heart."
Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, members of the Sanhedrim,
and secretly disciples of Christ, had probably not been present when
he was condemned. They now come forward and request Christ's
body, and it is yielded to them. Providing richly linen and spices
for its enswathment, and doubtless assisted by the devoted women,
they prepare the sacred form and lay it in the new tomb.
PART V. PASSION WEEK TO THE BURIAL.
Study. 22. Crucifixion and Burial.
(1) Occurrences on the way to Calvary 701&-711
a. Jesus faints as he bears his cross 7016, 702
b. Simon the Cyrenian bears the cross 702, 703
c. The weeping women who follow 703
d. Christ's words to them 703-711
(2) The Crucifixion and title on the cross 711-713
a. Christ affixed to the cross 711
b. His clothing disposed of among the soldiers 711
c. Pilate's superscription 711-713
THE DAUGHTERS OF JERUSALEM WEEPING. 7016
(3) Christ's prayer for his enemies 713, 714
(4) Railings against Christ > 714, 715
(5) The case of the two thieves 713-716
a. The impenitent one 716
b. The penitent one 716-723
(6) Mary, the mother of Christ 723-733
a. Christ makes provision for her 723, 724
b. View of Christ's relations with his mother 724-733
(7) Closing events 733-769
a. The period of darkness 733, 734
b. Christ's anguish of soul 734-741
c. The saying " I thirst " 741-743
d. The saying " It is finished " 743-748
e. Last words 748, 749
/. Attendant miracles 749-759
(8) Physical cause of Christ's death 759-769
a. Evidence that it was a breaking of the heart 759-769
6. Light on Scripture 766
c. Gives a spiritual and right view of Christ's sufferings 766-768
d. Sacrificial death, preciousness of shed blood 768, 769
(9) The burial. 769-776
a. Service of Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus , 769-774
6. Service of the women 774, 775
c. The grave in a garden 775, 776
VII.
The Daughters of Jerusalem Weeping.*
The mockeries of the judgment hall ended, Jesus is delivered into
the hands of the officers, to be led away to the place of execution. It
cannot now be settled with certainty or exactness, where this hill of
Calvary was situated, nor how far it was from the residence of Pilate.
It lay, we know, without the city gate, and a very ancient tradition
points us to a low, bare, rounded elevation, outside and near the
walls, which resembled somewhat in its form a human skull, and is
supposed to have got from that resemblance the name it bore, of
Golgotha. If that indeed was Calvary, the way was but a short one
which the sad procession had to traverse. First, however, ere begin-
ning the mournful march, they strip our Lord of the purple robe they
had thrown around his bleeding shoulders, and put his own raiment
* Matt. 27 : 31-34 ; Luke 23 : 27-32.
702 THE JLIFE OF CHRIST.
on him. It is not said that the y took the crown of thorns from his
bleeding brow ; he may have worn that to the last. It was part oi
the degradation of a public crucifixion that the doomed one should
assist in carrying to the place of crucifixion the instrument of death.
They might have spared this indignity to Jesus ; they might have
had some compassion as they saw with what a faint and weary step
he walked. But compassion has no place in the hearts of these cru-
cifiers, and so they lay the common burden on him. He sinks be-
neath the load. They must relieve him of it; but who will bear it
instead ? not one of themselves will stoop to the low office. A stran-
ger, a man from Africa, Simon the Cyrenian, coming in from the
country, meets them by the way. He would willingly have let the
crowd go by that presses on to Calvary. But he is the very kind of
man whom they can turn into a tool to do this piece of drudgery.
They lay hold of him and compel him to take up what Jesus was too
weak to bear. Unwillingly he had to obey, to turn upon his steps,
and follow Jesus, bearing after him the cross ; a reluctant instrument
of an overbearing soldiery and a haughty priesthood.
So far as we can learn, Simon had no previous knowledge of, had
no special interest in Christ ; instead of any great sympathy with
him at the moment, he may rather have felt and resented it as a
hardship, that such a service should have been exacted of him, and
in such imperious fashion. But this compulsory companionship with
Jesus in the bearing of the cross, carried him to Calvary ; the sad
tragedy enacted there forced him with so many other idle spectators
to the spot. He stood there gazing upon the scene; he heard the
words that came from the lips of Jesus; he felt the three hours'
darkness come down and wrap them all around. As the darkness
cleared away, he saw the centurion standing transfixed before the
central cross, as Jesus cried with a loud voice, and gave up the ghost.
He heard that Roman officer, a stranger like himself, break forth
with the exclamation : " Truly this was the Son of God !" What
impression all that he saw and heard then made upon him we are not
informed. From its being said, however, that he was the father of
Alexander and Eufus, whom Mark speaks of as being well-known
disciples of the Lord, may we not indulge the belief that He who,
when he was lifted up, was to draw all men unto him, that day drew
this Cyrenian to himself; that the sight of those sufferings and of
that death led Simon to inquire ; that the inquiry conducted to disci-
pleship ; and that ever after he had to thank the Lord for the strange
arrangement of his providence, which led him along that way into
the city, at the very time when they were leading Jesus out to be
THE DAUGHTERS OF JERUSALEM WEEPING. 703
crucified ; that he met the crowd at the very moment that thej were
wanting some one to do that menial service which in so rough a
manner they pressed him to undertake ?
Another incident marked the sorrowful procession to Calvary.
Some women of the city, looking at him, as first he bends beneath
the cross, and then, with aspect so meek and gentle, yet so sad and
sorrow-stricken, moves onward to be crucified, have their feelings so
deeply touched, that, unable to restrain their emotions, they openly
bewail and lament his doom. These are not the women who had
followed him from Galilee, and been in the habit of ministering to
him. No more than Simon, were they numbered with his disciples.
It was not with such grief as any of the Marys would have felt, had
they been in the crowd, that these women were affected. They were
not lamenting the loss of a teacher, a master, a friend they had
learned to revere and love. They had joined the crowd as it gath-
ered in the city thoroughfares through which it passed. The singu-
lar but common curiosity to look at men who are soon to die, and to
see how they comport themselves in front of death, has drawn them
on. Soon, however, out of the three who are going forth to be cruci-
fied, their attention fixes upon Jesus. Something of him they may
have known before ; some part of his story they may have picked up
by the way. They hear nothing friendly to him from any who are
there around them. The spirit of the crowd they mingle with is one
of rude and bitter hatred towards him. But woman's loving eye
looks on him, woman's tender heart is melted at the sight ; and de-
spite of all the restraint that might have been imposed on them by
the tone and temper of that crowd, revelling with savage delight at
the prospect of his crucifixion, and led on by some of the chief men
of the city, they give free vent to that generous pity which swells
their bosoms. They weep as they follow him. This weeping — the
only circumstance, so far as we know, attending his passage out to
Calvary, that attracted the special notice of our Lord — was the only
one which induced him to break the patient silence he has all along
observed. But how does he notice it? What does he say? He
stops; he turns; he fixes his eye upon the weepers; and he says,
"Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves,
and for your children."
" Weep not for me." Does he reject that simple tribute of sym-
pathy which they are rendering? Is he in any sense displeased at
the tears they shed? Does he blame or forbid such tears? Not
thus are we to interpret our Saviour's words. It may be quite true
that it was not from any very deep, much less from any very pure or
704 THE LIFE OP CHRIST.
holy fountain, that those tears were flowing. It may have been noth-
ing about him but the shame and the agony he had to suffer which
drew them out. Still, they are tears of kindly pity, and such tears
it never could have been his meaning or intention to condemn. He
had freely shed such tears himself. They fell before the tomb of
Lazarus, fell simply at sight of the weeping sisters, and of the Jews
weeping along with them. Sympathy with human suffering, simply
and purely as such, claims the sanction of the tears which upon that
occasion the Saviour shed : and that sanction covers the bewailing ol
these daughters of Jerusalem. Jesus is not displeased with, Jesus
does not reject, the expression of their pity. So far from this, the
tender sympathy that they show for him stirs a still deeper sympathy
for them within his heart. This is the way that he acknowledges and
thanks them for their tears. He thinks of them, he feels for them ;
he forgets his own impending griefs as he contemplates theirs. It
had been but an hour or so before, that all the people who gathered
round the bar of Pilate had cried out, " His blood be on us, and on
our children !" How little did they know what a doom it was they
thus invoked upon themselves; how near and how terrible! But
Jesus knew it; had thought of it perhaps when that wild cry arose;
was thinking of it still. He had those scenes of famine, fire, and
slaughter, when that ill-fated city of his crucifiers should see the exe-
cution of the sentence they had called down upon their own heads —
he had them all before his eye when he turned to those women by the
way, and said to them, " Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me,
but weep for yourselves, and for your children. For, behold, the
days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren,
and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us ; and to
the hills, Cover us."
Many of the very women who were lamenting Jesus by the way,
may have perished in the siege of Jerusalem. That siege took place
within less than forty years from the day of our Lord's crucifixion
Some of the younger mothers of that weeping band would not ha^e
then seen out the threescore years a»d ten of human life. Theii
children would be all in middle life, constituting the generation upor
which those woes were to descend which, three days before, while
sitting quietly on the Mount of Olives with his disciples, looking
across the valley upon the Holy City, Jesus had described by saying,
that in those days there should be great tribulation, such as was not
from the beginning of the world to that time, no, nor ever should be
again. When in the straitness of that terrible siege, before the ter-
THE DAUGHTERS OF JERUSALEM WEEPING. 706
rors of the last assault, they crept into the underground passages and
sewers of the city ; when those who escaped out of the city hid them-
selves in the dens and rocks of the mountains — then were those proph-
ecies of Isaiah and Hosea, which our Saviour had obviously before
him — some of whose words, indeed, he quotes — in part fulfilled. But
jusfc as, in that more lengthened discourse which our Lord had so
recently delivered to his disciples, he mixed up in a way that it is
impossible wholly to unravel, the destruction of Jerusalem, his sec-
ond coming, and the end of the world ; so also, even within the com-
pass of this short speech to the daughters of Jerusalem, it is easy
enough to perceive that, beyond that nearer and more limited event,
of which these women and their children were to be spectators, our
Lord looks forward to the wider judgment, which at the close of all
was to enfold the whole world of the impenitent in its embrace.
And widening thus, as we are warranted to do, the scope and
bearing of our Lord's words to these daughters of Jerusalem, let us
ask ourselves, what message of instruction and of warning do they
convey to us and to all men ? First, I think we shall not be wrong
if we interpret them as indicating to us the unprofitableness of that
sympathy with human suffering which takes in nothing but the suf-
fering it sees, and which expends itself alone in tears. The sympathy
excited in the breasts of these women of Jerusalem was of this kind.
It was the spectacle of human grief then before their eyes which had
awakened it ; there was a danger at least, that those sensibilities, so
deeply moved as long as the spectacle was before them, should col-
lapse when that spectacle was withdrawn, and leave the heart quick-
ened, it might be, in its susceptibility to the mere emotion of com-
passion, yet not otherwise improved. * Weep not, then,' the Saviour
says to them, and says to us ; ' weep not for me ; weep not, or weep
not long, and weep not idly, over any sight or story of human suffer-
ing which calls not for your interference, which you have no power,
not even by the sympathy that you expend upon it, to mitigate ; or if,
naturally and irresistibly, properly and becomingly, your tears flow
forth, stop not at their shedding, do not indolently indulge the mere
sentiment of pity ; such indulgence may become but a piece of selfish
gratification, narrowing the heart and paralyzing the* hand for the
dispositions and the doings of a true and genuine benevolence.' Pity
was never meant by the Creator to be separately or exclusively culti-
vated as an isolated emotion ; it was meant to be the spring and the
ally of a ready and generous aid held out to its object; to be tLe
stimulus to, and the support of active effort. And such is the struc-
ture of that beautiful and nicely balanced instrument, the human
Ufa of Christ, 45
706 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
spirit, that if this established connection between action and einotiou
be overlooked ; if you foster the one without letting it lead on to the
other, you do a serious damage to the soul ; you create in one region
a monstrous overgrowth, in another a stunted deformity; and you
dislocate and disconnect what the Creator intended should always be
conjoined.
Take here the familiar instance of indulging to excess the reading
of exciting fiction — tales in which the hero of the story passes through
terrible trials, endurances, agonies of mind and heart. Our heart
may pulsate all through with pity as we read; we may wet with tears
the page that spreads out some heart-rending scene. Now, I am not
going to say that it is in itself a wrong, or a sinful thing, or even a
hurtful thing, to read such stories. On the contrary, I believe that it
is not wrong; that it may be as beneficial as it is agreeable occasion-
ally to do so. There are peculiar and there are good services to
mind and heart that a well-executed fiction may render, which you
cannot have rendered in any other way so well. But let such kind of
reading usurp the place that should be given to other and better
employment; let the taste for it be gratified, without the considera-
tion of anything beyond the pleasure that it yields ; let the heart of
the reader, with all its manifold affections, give itself up to be played
upon continually by the hand of some great master in the art of
quickening to the uttermost its sympathies with human passions and
human griefs ; will that heart, whose sensibilities may thus be stimu-
lated until it yield to the gentlest touch of the great describer, will it
be made kinder and better in its dispositions ? will it even be made
more tender to the sorrows of the real sufferers among whom it lives
and moves ? Is it not notoriously the reverse ? You will find few
more selfish, few less practically benevolent, than those who expend
all their stores of pity upon ideal woes. It is a deep well of pity,
that which God has sunk in most human hearts. They are healing,
refreshing, fructifying waters that it sends forth to cover the sorrows
of the sorrowful ; but if these waters be dammed up within the heart,
they become first stagnant, and then the breeders of many noxious
vapors, under which the true and simple charities wither away.
But let us now give to our Lord's words a more direct application
to himself; to himself as the bearer of the cross. It cannot be thought
that all sympathy with the Man of sorrows is forbidden. The recital,
especially of his last sufferings, would not have been so full and so
minute as it is in the sacred page, had it not been intended to take
hold thereby of that sympathy. But the contemplation of Christ
merely as a sufferer if it terminate in nothing else than the excite-
THE DAUGHTERS OF JERUSALEM WEEIING 707
ment of sympathy, is a barren contemplation. Offer him nothing
besides your compassion, he repudiates and rejects it. It is to dis-
honor the Redeemer to class him with those unfortunates, those un-
willing victims of distress, whose unexampled sorrows knock hard at
the heart of pity. Our pity he does not ask, he does not need. He
spreads out before us his unparalleled griefs; he says, "Behold, and
see if there be any sorrow like unto my sorrow ;" but he does so not
to win from us compassion, but to prove how he has loved us, loved
us even to the death, suffering and dying for our redemption. His
sorrows should set us thinking of our own sins. Those sufferings
which rested upon him when he took his place as our great Head
and Representative, should bring up before our minds the sufferings
which hang suspended over the heads of the finally impenitent and
unbelieving.
" Weep not for me, but weep for yourselves ; for if these things be
done in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry ?" He w T as him-
. self the Green Tree ; the fresh, the vigorous Yine — its stock full of
sap, its branches all nourished by union with that parent, life-giving
Stem. Was he, then — in condition so unlike to that of fuel ready for
the fire — cast into that great furnace of affliction ? Had he to endure
all its scorching, though to him unconsuming flames? What shall
be done with him whose heart softens not at the sight of this divine
and all-enduring love; whose heart closes up and hardens against
God and Christ, till it becomes like one of those dry and withered
branches which men gather and cast into the fire ? If God spared
not his own Son, but gave him up to the death for us all, who is
there, among the rejecters and despisers of such a Saviour, that he
will spare ? Or if you would have the same argument set before you
in yet another form, take it as presented by Peter: "For the time is
come that judgment must begin at the house of God : and if it first
begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel
of God? And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the
ungodly and the sinner appear?" I shall make no attempt either to
expand or enforce the argument thus employed. Let me only remind
you, that it was by these strange and solemn words of warning, " If
they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry ?"
that our Lord closed the public teaching of his ministry upon earth.
Quiet as our skies now look, and secure and stable as all things
around us seem, the days are coming — he has told us among his
latest sayings — when those who resist the approaches of his love
shall see him in other guise, and when at the sight they " shall cry
to the mountains, Fall on us, and to the hills, Cover us ; hide us from
708 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the face of him that sitteth upon the throne, and from the wrath oi
the Lamb : for the great day of his wrath is come ; and who shall be
able to stand ?" How wise and good a thing were it for us all, in
prospect of such days coming, to hide ourselves even now in the
clefts of the smitten Rock ; to hide ourselves in Jesus Christ as oui
loving Lord and Saviour; that, safe within that covert, the tabula-
tion of those days may not reach us.
And now let me crave your attention, for a moment or two, to
that singular tie of thought which so quickly linked together in the
mind of the Saviour the sight of those sorrowful daughters of Jeru-
salem, with the fearful doom that was impending over their city.
It was very remarkable how frequently and how vividly, in all its
minute details, the coming destruction of Jerusalem was present to
his thoughts during the last days and hours of his earthly ministry.
From the day that he raised Lazarus from the grave — knowing that
his enemies had taken counsel together to put him to death — Jesus
walked no more openly among the Jews. He retired to the country
beyond Jordan near to the wilderness. His hour at last approached,
and he set his face to go up to Jerusalem to be crucified. He was
in a part of the country that was under Herod's jurisdiction, and
they told him that Herod sought to kill him. It cannot be, he said,
that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem. The naming of the holy
city; the thought of all the blood of all the prophets that was to
cry out against her and to seal her doom, filled his heart with
sadness, and instantly he broke out into the exclamation, " O Jeru-
salem, Jerusalem ! thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them
which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy
children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under
her wings, and ye would not ! Behold, your house is left unto you
desolate !"
On the Saturday before his death he arrives at Bethany. Next
clay he ascends the Mount of Olives. In the city they have heard of
his coming. They go out to meet him, they hail him as they had
never done before. Garments and palm-branches are spread upon
the ground that he is to tread. Before him and around him the
voices of the multitude are shouting "Hosanna! Blessed is he that
cometh in the name of the Lord. Hosanna to the Son of David !
Hosanna in the highest!" The ridge of the hill is reached, and
Jerusalem bursts upon the view, lying across the valley spread out
before the eye. He pauses; he gazes; his eyes overflow with tears.
How strange it looks to that jubilant multitude ! Ah ! other sounds
than their hosannas are falling on the Saviour's inner ear; other
THE DAUGHTERS OF JERUSALEM WEETING. 70&
Bights than that of their waving palm-branches are rising before hifl
prophetic eye. He weeps; and without naming it, looking at the
doomed city, and pointing to it, he says: "If thou hadst known,
even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy
peace ! but now they are hid from thine eyes. For the days shall
come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee,
and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side, and shall
lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and
they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another ; because thou
knewest not the time of thy visitation."
Christ's last day in the temple and in Jerusalem was one of great
excitement, of varied incident. Question after question about his
authority to teach, about the payment of tribute-money, about the
resurrection of the dead, is put to him. Attempt after attempt is
made to entangle him in his talk. At last, from being the assailed,
Jesus in his turn becomes the assailant, puts the question about
Christ being'David's Son and David's Lord, which none of them can
answer, and then proceeds to launch his terrible denunciations at
the scribes and Pharisees. Woe is heaped upon woe, till all the
righteous blood shed upon the earth seems coming on the men of
that generation, and concentratedly upon that city of Jerusalem.
Again, as when he first turned his face towards the holy city, the
thought melts his spirit into tenderness; the indignation dissolves
and passes away, as, taking up the same words he had used before,
he exclaims, " Jerusalem, Jerusalem ! thou that killest the proph-
ets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would
I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth
her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your
house is left unto you desolate" — our Lord's last words within the
temple.
As they went out in the afternoon of that day, "Master," said
one of his disciples to him, " see what manner of stones and what
buildings are here ! Jesus answering said unto him, Seest thou these
great buildings ? Verily I say unto you, there shall not be left here
one stone upon another that shall not be thrown down." Later in
the evening of that day — two days before his crucifixion — he sat
upon the Mount of Olives over against the temple, looking once
again at these great buildings, and in answer to an inquiry of his
disciples, tired though he must have been with all the incidents of a
most harassing day, he entered upon that lengthened prophecy in
which he told how Jerusalem should be trodden down of the Gen-
tiles. And now again, in this last stage of his way to Calvary, the
710 THE LIFE OE CHKIST.
days that lie had spoken of so particularly in that prophecy are
once more before his eyes. How shall we explain all this? How
was it that the city of Jerusalem had such a hold upon the heart ol
Jesus Christ? How was it that the joys and the sorrows, the prov-
ocations and the sympathies of his latest days, all alike, by some
mysterious link of association, called up before his thoughts the
terrible calamities which Jerusalem was to endure ? Grant all that
can be claimed for Jerusalem in the way of preeminence both as to
character and destiny over all the cities of this earth ; acknowledge
the power that the close connection between our Lord's own death
and its destruction must have exerted upon his mind ; but beside all
this, may we not believe that in the human heart of Jesus, as we
know that there was room for special affection, individual attach-
ment, so also was there room for the patriotic sentiment, that love of
country by which every true man of woman born is characterized ?
Jesus was a Jew. Judea was the land of his birth. Jerusalem was
the chief city of that land. Around its earlier and its later history
there gathered all of joyful and of sorrowful interest that could touch
a Jewish heart. And it touched the spirit of Jesus to contemplate
its downfall. Are we wrong in thinking that with that which was
divine, and that which was broadly human, there mingled a Jewish,
a patriotic element in the grief which shed tears over its destruc-
tion ? If love of country form part of a perfect man, shall we not
believe that, purified from all imperfections — its narrowness, its ex-
clusiveness, its selfishness — that affection had a place and found a
home in the bosom of our Lord ?
At such a season as this in the history of our own land we would
fain believe so. A common loss, a common grief, a common sym-
pathy, has knit all hearts together, as they have but rarely been
united. He can have been no ordinary prince, whose death has
caused so general, such universal grief. And she assuredly is no
ordinary queen, whose sorrow has been made their own by so many
millions of human hearts. There is something cementing, purifying,
ennobling, in a whole nation mourning as ours does now. Let us
try to consecrate that mourning, and while we give to our beloved
Sovereign the entire sympathy of our heart, only wishing that she
fully knew* what a place she holds in the affections of her people,
let us lift up our hearts in gratitude to Him who has bestowed on us
in her such a priceless treasure, and let us lift up prayers to heaven,
that she may have imparted to her that comfort and strength, which,
* This lecture was delivered on the Sunday succeeding the death of the
prince consort, and before full expression of public sympathy had been given.
THE PENITENT THIEF. 711
in such sorrow as hers, the highest and the humblest of earth equallj
need, and which are bestowed alike on all who ask, and trust, and
hope, in and through Jesus Christ our Lord.
VIII.
The Penitent Thief.*
One of the first things done by the Koman soldiers to whom tlie
execution of the sentence was committed, was to strip our Saviour
and to nail him to the cross. We do not know whether that cruel
operation of transfixing the hands and feet was performed while the
cross yet lay upon the ground, or after it was erected. They offered
him — in kindness let us believe rather than in scorn, wine mingled
with myrrh, an anodyne or soothing draught, fitted to dull or deaden
the sense of pain, but he waved it away ; he would do nothing that
might lull the senses, but might at the same time impair the full,
clear, mental consciousness. The clothing of the criminal was in all
such instances a legal perquisite of the executioners, and the soldiers
proceeded to divide it among them. The other parts of his outer
raiment they found it comparatively easy to divide ; but when they
came to his inner coat, finding it of somewhat unusual texture,
woven from the top throughout — it may have been his mother's
workmanship, or the gift of some of those kind women who had
ministered to his wants and comforts — they found no way of dis-
posing of it so easy as to cast lots among them whose it should be,
fulfilling thus, but all unconsciously, that Scripture, which, apart
from this manner of disposal of the clothing, we might not well
have understood how it could be verified — "They parted my raiment
among them, and for my vesture they did cast lots."
Pilate's last act that morning, after he had given up Jesus to be
crucified, was to have the ground of his sentence declared in a wri-
ting which he directed should be placed conspicuously upon the cross
above his head. To secure that this writing should be seen and
read of all men, Pilate further ordered that it should be written in
Greek, and Latin, and Hebrew, the three chief languages of the
time. All the four evangelists record what this writing or super-
scription was, yet in each the words of which it was composed are
differently reported. No two of them agree as to the precise terms
* Matt, 27 : 35-37 ; John 19 : 20-22 ; Luke 23 : 28-43
712 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
of the title, though all of them are perfectly at one as to its meaning
and intent. It does not in the least surprise us when four different
narrators of some spoken, and it may be lengthened discourse, vary
here and there in the exact words imputed to the speaker. It is
somewhat different when it is a short written public document, like
&hat placed over the Saviour's head on this occasion, the contents oi
which are given. Here we might naturally have expected that the
very words — literatim et verbatim — would have been preserved. And
if it be not so, in this case as well as in others equally if not more
remarkable, such as that of the few words spoken by the voice from
heaven at the time of the Saviour's baptism, and those spoken by our
Lord himself at the institution of his own supper — if it be the
general sense, and not the exact words which the sacred writers
present to us, is there no warning in this against the expectation of
finding a minute and literal exactness everywhere in the gospel nar-
rative ? no warning against our treating that narrative as if such
kind of exactness had been intended, and is to be found therein ?
The sight of this title, posted up so prominently above the head
of Jesus, annoyed the Jews. The chief priests were especially pro-
voked ; nor have we far to go to discover the reason of their provo-
cation. Among the last things Pilate said to them, when he brought
out Jesus, had been, "Behold your king!" And among the last
things they said to Pilate, in the heat of their exasperation, and the
urgency of their desire to have Jesus ordered off to instant crucifix-
ion, was, " Away, away with him ! crucify him ! we have no king but
Ccesar" — 'this man is not only a false pretender, but he and all others
except Caesar are traitors who make any such pretension.' Thus, in
that unguarded hour, did they absolutely renounce all desire or hope
of having a king of their own. Pilate took them at their word, and
put over Christ's head such a title as implied that any one claiming
to be king of the Jews might, on that ground alone, whatever his
rights and claims — on the ground simply of the allegiance which the
Jews owed, and which the chief priests had avowed, to the Roman
emperor — be justly condemned to death. When they looked at that
legal declaration of his crime placed above Christ's head, and thought
of all that it implied, the chief priests hurried back to Pilate, and
asked him to make a modification of it, which should leave it open
that there might be another king of the Jews besides Caesar. " Write
act," they said to Pilate, "The king of the Jews; but that he said,
I am king of the Jews." Let it be made patent, that it was as an
illegitimate claimant that he was put to death. In il] humor with
himself, in worse humor with them, Pilate is in no mood to listen to
1
THE PENITENT THIEF. 713
thoir proposal. He will hold them tightly to their own denial and
disavowal of any king but Caesar; and so, with a somewhat sharp
and surly decisiveness, he dismisses them by saying, "What I have
written I have written."
Meanwhile, the soldiers have completed their cruel work. It was
when in their hands, or soon after, that Jesus said, " Father, forgive
them, for they know not what they do." Such rough handling as
that to which our Lord had been subjected, such acute bodily suffer-
ing as it had inflicted, have a strong tendency to irritate, and to
render the sufferer indifferent to everything beyond his own injuries
and pains. But how far above this does Jesus rise ! No murmur-
ing; no threatening; no accusation; no lament no cry for help; no
invoking of vengeance; no care for, or thought of self; no obtruding
of his own forgiveness. It is not, I forgive you; but, "Father, for-
give them." No sidelong glance even at his own wrongs and suffer-
ings, in stating for what the forgiveness is solicited. "They know
not what they do;" in this simple and sublime petition, not the
slightest, most shadowy trace of self-consideration. It is from a
heart occupied with thought for others, and not with its own woes ;
it is out of the depths of an infinite love and pity, which no waters
can quench, that there comes forth the purest and highest petition
for mercy that ever ascended to the Father of mercies in the heavens.
It is from the lips of a Brother-Man that this petition comes, yet
from One who can speak to God as to his own Father. It is from
Jesus on the cross it comes ; from him who submits to all the shame
and agony of crucifixion, that as the Lamb that once was slain for
us, he might earn, as it were, the right thus to pray, and furnish
himself with a plea in praying, such as none but he possesseth and
can employ. As a prophet, he had spoken to the daughters of Jeru-
salem by the way; as the great High Priest, he intercedes for his
crucifiers from the cross.
Nor are we to confine that intercession to those for whom in the
first instance it was exerted. "Wide over the whole range of sinful
humanity does that prayer of our Kedeemer extend. For every
sinner of our race, if it be true of him that he knew not what he did,
that prayer of Jesus goes up to the throne of mercy. It was in
comparative ignorance that those soldiers and those Jews crucified
Jesus. Had they known what they did, we have an apostle's testi-
mi d
dignities that could have been bestowed upon a woman, the ve'cy
greatest, we believe, was that which was thus conferred on Mary.
And to the reverential regard which this relationship demands, we
are prepared to add the still higher regard due to her genuine
modesty, her simple faith. Nor are we sure but that, in the depth
of our recoil from the superstitious reverence that has gathered
round her name, we have overlooked and failed to do full justice
to the simplicity, the beauty, the retiringness of that piety which
makes her among the pious women of the gospels what John was
among the apostles of our Lord. But when asked to worship her,
THE MOTHER OF OUR LORD. 72 ( J
to pray to lier as tlie mother of the Lord, to entreat that she will
exert her influence with her Divine Son, is it possible to overlook
that Treatment which she met with at our Lord's own hands when
here upon earth; is it possible to put away from us the thought that,
in that very treatment, he was prophetically uttering his own solemn
protest against any such idolatrous magnifying of the position and
relationship in which it pleased God that she should stand to him ?
We say this in the spirit of no mere ecclesiastical quarrel with the
worship of the virgin. We know how soon paganism mingled its
superstitions with the simple worship of the Crucified ; and we can
well, therefore, understand how, in virtue of all the gentle and sacred
associations that linked themselves with her name, her character,
her peculiar connection with Jesus, Mary should have come to be
regarded with an idolatrous regard. Nay, further, looking back
upon those dark ages when, under the grinding tread of Northern
barbarism, the civilization of Southern Europe was well-nigh obliter-
ated, we can see a beauty, a tenderness, a power in the worship of
Mary ; in the prayers and the hymns addressed to her, which turned
them into a softening and civilizing element. Nay, further still, were
we asked, among all the idolatries that have prevailed upon this idol-
loving, idol-worshipping world of ours, to say which one of them it
was that touched the finest chords of the human heart, awoke the
purest and tenderest emotions, had the best and most humanizing
effect, we do not know but that we should fix upon this worship of
the virgin. But delivered, as we have been, from the bondage of the
middle-age superstitions; with that narrative in our hands which
tells us how our Lord himself dealt with Mary; standing as we do,
or ought to do, in the full light of that great truth, that "there ie
one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ
Jesus" — it cannot but be matter of surprise, that this worship of the
virgin should still prevail in so many of the enlightened countries ol
Christendom; suggesting the reflection, how slowly it is that the
human spirit emancipates itself from any natural, long-continued,
and fondly cherished superstition.
Keeping now the whole history of Mary's previous connection
with our Lord before our eye, and especially their intercourse during
the three years of his public ministry, let us dwell for a moment or
two upon Christ's recognition of her from the cross. This affec-
tionate recognition in his dying agonies, must have been peculiarly
grateful to Mary. His departure from Nazareth, to which he seems
to have paid only one short visit afterwards; his separation from
the members of his own family; his engrossment with the great
730 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
objects of his public life ; the checks he had imposed upon hei
interference; the manner in which he had publicly spoken of her;
all these must have created something like a feeling of estrangement
in Mary's breast, as if he had ceased to be to her all that he once
was. How pleasing to her then to learn from that look and speech
yt kindness, that his love for her remained unchanged. How sooth-
ing to her motherly affection to receive this last, this parting token
of his undying affection for her ! She may banish all her fears, bury
all her suspicions ; that Son of hers, he loves her still, loves her as
he had ever done ; he cannot die without assuring her of that love.
But it is more than a simple expression of affection that comes here
from the Redeemer's lips. There is a thoughtful care for Mary's
future earthly comfort, the securing for her the attention of another
son, the providing for her the shelter of a new home. The dying
Jesus has presented to his thoughts the bereaved, the desolate con-
dition in which his death will leave his mother ; he will make all the
provision he can towards alleviating her distress; silver and gold he
has none to give her, but he has what silver and gold could never
buy — a hold and power over the heart of one who, if he be well
described as the disciple whom Jesus loved, might almost as aptly
be described as the disciple who loved Jesus. That hold he will
now exercise on her behalf. "Woman, behold thy son!" Woman,
not mother: he might, upon this occasion, have restrained himself
from calling her so, lest the very mention of her relationship to him
should mark her out to that unfriendly crowd, and expose her to
their ill-treatment. He is but repeating, however, on the cross, the
address of the marriage-feast — "Woman, behold thy son!" Mary,
perhaps up to that moment, had cherished some hope of his deliver-
ance ; but at that word this hope gives way ; she is to lose him ; he
is to be her son no more ; that tie is to be broken, and a new one
created in its stead. A better, kinder son than John, Jesus could
not have provided ; but, alas ! Mary feels that he can never fill that
Son's place; still there is great kindness in selecting such a sub-
stitute.
To John, no name, no epithet is applied ; Jesus simply looks at
him, and says, "Behold thy mother!" John had already been kind
to Mary, was at that moment doing what he could to comfort her,
would have cared for her, though no special charge of this kind had
been given ; but a son's place, that son's place, he could not have
felt warranted to assume. Now, however, when Jesus with his dying
breath calls upon him to occupy it, he counts it as a high honor con-
ferred upon him. He undertakes the trust, and proceeds tc execute
THE MOTHER OF OUR LORD. 731
it in the promptest and most delicate way. Was lie bnt interpreting
aright the look that Jesus gave him, or was he only obeying an
impulse of thoughtful, son-like affection in his own breast? How-
ever it was, he saw that Mary's strength was failing, that she was
unfit for the closing scene; he instantly led her away to his own
home in the city. She was not at the cross when the darkness
descended; she was not there when the last and bitterest agonies
were borne. You search for her in vain among the women who
stood afar off beholding to the last. By John's kind act of instant
withdrawal, she was saved what she might not have had strength to
bear; and though that withdrawal was neither prescribed nor sug-
gested by our Lord himself, one can well imagine with what a grate-
ful look he would follow that son as he discharged this the first
office of his new relationship; how pleased he too would be that a
mother's heart was spared the pangs of witnessing that suffering
which drew from him the cry, "My God! my God! why hast thou
forsaken me ?" Mary showed the submissiveness of her disposition
in yielding to John's suggestion, and retiring from the cross, and
you never see her but once again in the gospel narrative. Neither
at the resurrection nor at the ascension, nor during the forty days
that intervened between them, is her name mentioned, or does she
appear. The one and only glance we get of her is in the first chap-
ter of the Acts of the Apostles, where her name and that of our
Lord's brother, who had come then to believe on him, are mentioned
among the hundred and twenty who, after the ascension, continued
in prayer and supplication, waiting for the promise of the Spirit.
And now, in conclusion, in that love which in his latest hoars
Jesus showed to Mary, let us hail the great and perfect example of
filial affection he has left behind him. In that mingling with the
broader thoughts of a world's redemption which must then have
occupied his thoughts, the thoughtful care for her earthly comfort,
let us see the evidence of how essential a part of all true religion it
is to provide, as God enables us, for those whom we leave behind us
in this world. Let no pretext of other and higher obligations
weaken within our breasts the sense of our obligation to discharge
this duty before we die.
From our Saviour's treatment of Mary let us learn, too, to put in
their right place, to estimate according to their real worth, all earth-
ly, all external distinctions. To be the mother of our Lord, that
raised her above all other women, and we gladly join with all who,
upon that ground, would call her blessed ; yet would we still more
wish to join heart and soul in our Lord's own saying, that '• more
732 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
blessed is he that heareth the word of God, and doeth it." To be the
nearest herald, the immediate harbinger of Jesus, that raised John
the Baptist above all the prophets, and ranked him among the great-
est of blie children of men. But yet there is another connection with
Christ, higher and still more honorable — a connection in comparison
fcith which the closest of mere external or official bonds sink into
absolute insignificance — that inward, that spiritual, that eternal tie
which binds the humble, contrite, trustful spirit to the Redeemer.
To be the least in his kingdom, to be the least among those who
truly love and faithfully obey him, is a more enduring, a more illus-
trious distinction than to be the highest among those upon whom the
honors of this world are heaped. And let us bless God for it, that
this, the highest honor to which humanity can be exalted, is one that
is within the reach of all. It cometh through humility and faith and
love : it cometh through the weight of our sin being felt, the worth
of our Redeemer being appreciated. It cometh through our becom-
ing as little children, and yielding ourselves up to those gracious in-
fluences of the Divine Spirit, by which alone the prond heart can be
humbled, and the doubtful heart be assured, and the unloving heart
be brought to love. It cometh through the eye of faith being open-
ed to discern the closeness and the reality of the unseen world, that
world of spirits, whose all-engulfing bosom, when a few more of these,
numbered years of ours on earth are over, shall have received us all.
It cometh from our giving to all that concerns our spiritual state,
our spiritual welfare and preparation for futurity, that predominance
in our regards, our affections, our lives, to which their inherent, thei>
surpassing worth, entitles them. It springs from our caring less foi
the honor that cometh from man, and more for that honor which
cometh from God only.
Finally, let us realize those relationships to one another estab-
lished in Christ our Lord, which, in their closeness, their blessedness,
their enduringness, so far outmeasure all the other relationships ol
this human life. Why was John selected to take Christ's place, to
be a second son to Mary ? Why was Mary so specially committed
to his charge ? She had other sons, upon whom the duty naturally
devolved. They, indeed, as yet were unbelievers; and upon that
ground might fitly have been excluded. But were there not two of
her own sister's sons among the twelve ? Why pass the sister and
the nephews over, and select John to stand to her in this new rela-
tionship ? It may have been that John was better placed than they,
as to outward circumstances abler to provide a home for the bereaved;
but can we doubt that another and still weightier consideration de-
THE DARKNESS AND THE DESERTION. 733
fcermined the Saviour's choice — the spiritual affinity between John
and Mary; his capacity to enter into all her sorrows; his power by
sympathy to support? And ties kindred to those which bound John
and Mary together, do they not still bind together those whose hearts
have been taught to beat in unison, and who have been formed to be
mutual helps and comforts amid the trials and bereavements of life?
Thank God for it, if he has given you any such support as Mary and
John found in each other ; and rejoice in the belief, that those rela-
tionships which are grounded on and spring out of our oneness in
Jesus Christ, partake not of the mutability of this earthly scene,
but, destined to outlive it, are impressed with the seal of eternity.
The Darkness and the Desertion.*
The full bright sun of an eastern sky has been looking down ok
what these men are doing who have nailed Jesus to the cross, and
are standing mocking and gibing him. The mid-day hour has come ?
when suddenly there falls a darkness which swallows up the light,
and hangs a funereal pall around the cross : no darkness of an
eclipse — that could not be as the moon then stood — no darkness
which any natural cause whatever can account for. As we think of
it, many questions rise to which no answer can now be given. Did
it come slowly on, deepening and deepening till it reached its point
of thickest gloom? or was it, as we incline to believe, as instanta-
neous in its entrance as its exit : at the sixth hour, covering all in a
moment with its dark mantle; at the ninth hour, in a moment lifting
that mantle off? Was it total or partial : a darkness deep as thai
of moonless, starless midnight, wrapping the cross so thickly round,
that not the man who stood the nearest to it could see aught of the
sufferer? Or was it the darkness of a hazy twilight obscuring but
not wholly concealing, which left the upraised form of the Eedeemer
dimly visible through the gloom ? Was it local and limited, confined
to Jerusalem or Judea; or did it spread over the entire enlightened
portion of the globe ? We cannot tell. We may say of it, and say
truly, that it was inanimate nature, supplying, in her mute elements,
that sympathy with her suffering Lord which was denied by man.
* Mark IS 1 33, M.
734 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
Men gazed rudely on the sight, but the sun refused to look on it,
hiding his face for a season. Men would leave the Crucified, exposed
in shame and nakedness, to die; but an unseen hand was stretched
forth to draw the drapery of darkness around the sufferer, and hide
bim from vulgar gaze.
But the truest and deepest significance of this darkness is as a type
or emblem of the horror of that great darkness which at this period
enveloped the spirit of the Redeemer. The outer incidents, if there
were any, of those three hours of darkness, remain untold. We are left
only to believe that its sudden descent wrought like a spell upon the
actors and spectators ; it stopped each wagging head, it silenced each
gibing tongue ; not a word seems to have been spoken, not a thing
done ; there they stood, or there they lay, with that spell upon them,
wondering what this darkness meant. We can easily enough im-
agine what they may have fancied or felt during that strange period
of suspense ; but who can imagine what he was thinking, how he, the
Saviour, was feeling in that dread and awful interval ? No eye per-
haps may have pierced the outer darkness that shrouded his suffer-
ing body ; still less may any human eye penetrate that deeper dark-
ness which shrouded his suffering soul. We are left here without a
single external index ; not a look, a word, an act, to tell us what was
going on within the Redeemer's spirit — till the ninth hour came, the
moment which preceded the rolling away of the darkness, and the
return of the clear shining of the day, and then the only sound that
strikes the ear is the agonizing cry, " My God, my God ! why hast
thou forsaken me?" a cry wrung, as it were, from the sufferer's lips,
when the severe agony of the soul has reached its last, its culmina-
ting, its closing point ; a cry which, revealing somewhat of the inte-
rior of the burdened heart from which it springs, leaves still more
unrevealed ; a cry which, after we have listened to it, and pondered
it, and turned it over and over again in our thoughts, seems to grow
darker instead of brighter to our eye, and of which we become at
last convinced that it was the simple, spontaneous, irrepressible out-
cry of a spirit tried to the last limit of endurance ; the expression of
what must for ever remain to us an indescribable, unfathomable,
unimaginable woe.
It would strip, indeed, this cry of the suffering Saviour of all dif-
ficulty and mystery, could we look upon him as a man, and nothing
more ; could we look upon him in dying as subject to the same mental
and spiritual, as well as bodily weakness with any of ourselves;
could we believe that such doubts and fears as have eclipsed the
faith, and darkened for a time the hopes of other dying men, had
THE DAEKNESS AND THE DESERTION. 735
place within his breast; could we interpret this saying as the utter-
ance of a momentary despondency, a transient despair. We are
disposed to go the utmost length in attributing to the humanity of
our Lord all the sinless frailties of our nature; and had we seen him
struggling in agony through the tedious death-throes of dissolution^
the sinking body drawing the sinking spirit down along with it, and
draining it of all its strength — had it been from a spirit enfeebled to
the uttermost, its very powers of thought and apprehension, of faith
and feeling, fainting, failing, that this sad lament proceeded, we can
scarcely tell whether or not it would have been inconsistent with a
right estimate of the humanity of Jesus to attribute to him such a
momentary oppression under doubt and fear as should have forced
this exclamation from his lips, prompted by his obscured perception
of his personal relationship with the Father.
It stands, however, in the way of our receiving any such interpre-
tation of this saying, that it came from one whose intellect was so
clear and unclouded that the moment after it was uttered he could
reflect on all he had to say or do in order that the Scripture might
be fulfilled, and whose bodily powers were so far from being reduced
to the last extremity of weakness, that it was " with a loud voice,"
betokening a vigor as yet unexhausted, that he uttered the despair-
ing cry.
Besides, we have only to look back upon the few days that pre-
ceded the crucifixion, to find evidence that there mingled with the
sufferings which Christ endured upon the cross an element altogether
different from the common pains of dying. On one of the last days
of his teaching in the temple, certain Greeks desired to see him.
Their earnest request sounded to his prophetic ear like the entreaty
of the entire Gentile world. It threw him into a sublime reverie of
thought. Bright visions of a distant future, when all men should be
drawn unto him, rose before his eye ; but with them the vision of a
future even then at hand — of his being lifted up upon the cross. A
sudden change comes over his spirit. He ceases to think of, to
speak with man. His eye closes upon the crowd that stand around.
He is alone with the Father. A dark cloud wraps his spirit. He
fears as he enters it. From the bosom of the darkness there comes
an agitated voice: "Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say?
Father, save me from this hour! but for this cause came I unto this
hour. Father glorify thy name !" — some deep, inward trouble of the
heart, a shrinking from it, a cry for deliverance, a meek submission
to the Divine will. You have all these repeated in order, and with
greater intensity in the garden of Gethsemane : " My soul is exceed-
736 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ing sorrowful, even unto death. O my Father, if it be possilde, let
this cup pass from me : nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt."
Here, once more, there is the agony, the shrinking, the petition, the
acquiescence.
What so troubled Jesus in the temple? what threw him into that
bloody sweat in the garden? what drew from him those strong cry-
ings for deliverance? Can any one believe that it was the mere
prospect of dying upon a cross which thus shook his spirit to the
very centre? To believe so, were to degrade him beneath a level to
which multitudes of his followers have risen. Deaths far more for-
midable, more protracted, more excruciating, they have contemplated
beforehand with unruffled composure, and endured with unshrinking
fortitude. Shall the disciple be greater than the master? No; there
was something more in that hour for which Jesus came into this
world, something more in that cup which he took into his trembling
hands, than the mere bitterness of apprehended dissolution. He has
himself taught us, by the language which he employed, to identify
the hour and the cup. He has taught us, too, that this hour was on
on him in the temple; this cup was there raised by him to his lips.
The same hour was on him in the garden ; of the same cup he there
drank large and bitter draughts. It was that same hour which came
upon him on the cross, to run out its course during the supernatural
darkness; it was that same cup which he took once more into his
hands, to drain to the very dregs. Here also, as in the temple, in
the garden, you have the same features — the conflict, the recoil, the
victory. Perhaps the inward trouble and agony of his soul reached
a somewhat higher pitch on Calvary than in Gethsemane : that bitter
cry, " My God, my God ! why hast thou forsaken me ?" sounds to
our ear as coming from a profounder depth of woe than any into
which Jesus had ever sunk before ; but in source and in character
the sorrow of the Saviour's spirit was in each of the three instances
the same — a purely mental or spiritual grief, unconnected in two of
these cases with any bodily endurance, and, in the third, carefully
to be distinguished from those pains of dissolution with which it
mingled.
Whence did that grief arise ? what were its elements ? how came
it to be so accumulated and condensed, and to exert such a pressure
upon the spirit of our Redeemer, as to force from him those prayers
in the garden, this exclamation on the cross ? It was because he stood
as our great Head and Representative, and suffered in our room and
stead: "He was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for
our iniquities;" he "made his soul an offering for sin;" "he died the
THE DARKNESS AND THE DESERTION. 737
just for the unjust, to bring us to God." The testimony of the Scrip-
tures to the vicarious, sacrificial, atoning character of the sufferings
and death of Christ, is clear, emphatic, multiform, and unambiguous.
But when we go beyond the simple statements of the inspired record,
and, admitting the great fact of the atonement, inquire into the ho^
and the wherefore of that fact — resolved to accept implicitly all that
the Scriptures teach, but equally resolved not to go beyond its teach-
ing, nor add any theories of our owu to its simple and impressive
lessons — we feel ourselves on the borders of a region too remote, too
mysterious for eyes like ours fully and accurately to survey.
Let us, however, that we may catch a distant sight of one inner
fountain of our Bedeemer's sufferings, approach it by a path which,
for some distance at least, is not obscure. It is said in Scripture
that Christ bore our sins in his own body on the tree; it is said, also,
that he bore our griefs, and carried our sorrows. Our griefs he bore
by sympathy ; our sorrows he carried by entering into them f*nd ma-
king them his own. That central heart of love and pity opened itself
at every point to all the forms and varieties of human woe. Its sym-
pathy stood free from all those restraints that lie upon ours. Our
ignorance, our selfishness, our coldness, our incapacity for more than
a few intense affections, narrow and weaken the sympathy we feel.
But he knows all, can feel for all; so that not a pang of grief wrings
any human bosom but sends an answering thrill through the loving,
pitying heart of our Divine Bedeemer. Human sympathy, too, deep-
ens, takes a peculiar character, a peculiar tenderness, according to
the closeness and dearness of the tie which binds us to the sufferer.
A mother's fellow-feeling with a suffering child is something very dif-
ferent from what any stranger can experience. And it is not i dm ply
as one of us, as a brother man, that Jesus feels for us in our sorrows.
It is as one who has linked himself to our race, or rather has linked
our race to him by a tie the nature and force of which we are little
capable of understanding. Only we may say, that parent was never
bound to child, nor child to parent, in a bond so close as that which
binds Jesus Christ and those whom he came to redeem. It would
need his own omniscience to fathom the depth and intensity impart-
ed to his sympathy by the peculiarity of that relationship in which it
has pleased him to place himself to his own.
Now, Christ's is as much the central conscience as the central
heart of humanity. Conceive him entering into a connection with
human sin, kindred to that into which he enters with human sorrow,
realizing to himself, as he only could, its extent, its inveteracy, its
malignity : in this way taking on him all our sins, and letting the fuU
jttfe of Christ. 47
788 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
impression of their inherent turpitude, their ruinous results, fall upon
his spirit — who shall calculate for us the bulk and weight of that bur-
den which might thus come to be borne by him ? Once, in a Jewish
synagogue, he looked round upon a small company of men, and he
was grieved because of the hardness of their hearts. Let us imagine
that grief amplified and intensified to the uttermost by our Lord's
taking upon himself the sin of the world. Let all the hardness of all
men's hearts, all the hard speeches that ungodly sinners have spoken,
the ungodly deeds they have done ; let all the impurity, and injustice,
and cruelty, and profanity, and impiety which have been perpetrated
under these heavens — of which the enmity and malignity which nailed
him to the cross might be taken as a specimen and index ; let all thai
vast accumulation of human iniquity be conceived of as present to
the Redeemer's thoughts, appropriated and realized by him as the
iniquity of those to whom he had linked himself by a bond of closest
fellowship, of undying, unquenchable love; let all the sins of thai
world he came to save gather in and press down upon the pure and
holy and loving spirit of the man Christ Jesus : do we not get a dim
and distant sight of a fountain of woe thus opened within, sufficient
to send forth waters of bitterness which might well nigh overwhelm
his soul, putting his capacity to suffer to an extreme trial ?
Further still, may we not imagine that as he made thus the sins
of our sinful world his own, and thought and dwelt upon that holi-
ness of God, upon which they were such terrible invasions ; the wrath
of the Holy One, which they had so thoroughly deserved, and so
deeply had provoked ; the separation from God, the banishment from
his presence, the death they did so righteously entail; that, in the
very fulness of that love and sympathy which made him identify
himself with us men for our salvation, the horror of such a darkness
settled over the mind of the Redeemer, that the face even of his
heavenly Father for a moment seemed obscured, that its smile seemed
changed into a frown, that the momentary apprehension seized him
that in himself that death, that separation from the Father, was about
to be realized, so that from his oppressed, bewildered, faltering man-
hood there came forth the cry, " My God, my God ! why hast thou
forsaken me ?"
Let us not forget that there was not, indeed could not be — the
nature of the connection forbade it — any absolute or entire desertion
of the Son by the Father. " Therefore," said Jesus, "doth my Father
love me, because I lay down my life for the sheep." Could that love
be withdrawn from Jesus when he was in the very act of laying down
bis life ? " This," said the Father, " is my beloved Son, in whom I
THE DARKNESS AND THE DESERTION. 739
am well pleased." Was there ever a time at which he was more
pleased with him than when he was offering himself up in that sac-
rifice so acceptable to God : Nor does the Son ever entirely lose his
hold of the Father. Even in this moment of amazement and oppres-
sion it is still to God, as Ms God, that he speaks: u Mij God, my
God. ! why hast thou forsaken me ?" It was the sensible comfort only
of the Divine presence and favor which were for the time withdrawn ;
the felt inflowings of the Divine love which were for the time checked.
But what a time of agony must that have been to him who knew, as
none other could, what it was to bask in the light of his Father's
countenance ; who felt, as none other could, that his favor indeed was
life ! On us — so little do we know or feel what it is to be forsaken
by God— the thought of it, or sense of it, may make but a slight im-
pression, produce but little heartfelt misery; but to him it was the
consummation and the concentration of all woe, beyond which there
was and could be no deeper anguish for the soul.
I have thus presented to you but a single side, as it were, of that
sorrow unto death which rent the bosom of the Redeemer, as he was
offering himself a sacrifice for us upon the cross. Perhaps it is the
side which lies nearest to us, and is most open to our comprehension.
Certainly it is one the looking at which believingly is fitted to tell
powerfully on our consciences and hearts — to make us feel the ex-
ceeding sinfulness of our sin, and set us hopefully and trustfully to
struggle with the temptations that beset our path.
In a household wdiich enjoyed all the benefits of high culture and
Christian care, one of the children committed a grievous and unex-
pected fault — he told a falsehood to cover a petty theft ; rebuke and
punishment w T ere administered, carried farther than they had ever
been before, but without effect. The offender was not awakened to
any real or deep sorrow for his offence. The boy's insensibility quite
overcame his father. Sitting in the same room with his obstinate
and sullen child, he bent his head upon his hands, and, sobbing,
burst into a flood of tears. For a moment or two the boy looked on
in w r onder ; he then crept gradually nearer and nearer to his sobbing
parent, and at last got upon his father's knees, asking, in a low whis-
per, why it was that he was weeping so. He was told the reason.
It wrought like a spell upon his young heart ; the sight of his father
suffering so bitterly on his account was more than he could bear
He flung his little arms around his father, and wept along with him.
That father never needed to correct his child again for any like
offence. And surely, if, in that great sorrow which overwhelmed the
spirit of our Redeemer on the cross, there mingled, as one of its
740 THE LITE OF CHRIST.
ingredients, a grief like, in origin and character, to that which wrung
this father's heart, and melted his child to penitence, the sight and
thought of it ought to exert a kindred power over those for whom
Jesus died.
A younger son is guilt)' of a great offence against his father. His
elder brother, in acting the part of a mediator between the offending
child and his offended parent, might voluntarily submit to the exact
and the full punishment which his younger brother had deserved—
by doing so might turn away the father's wrath, and earn the title tc
a brother's gratitude. But what if the offender sees his elder brother,
at the pure and simple impulse of love, melted into a profound and
heart-breaking grief, yearning over him, weeping over him, taking on
himself a suffering far more acute than that which the lash of parent-
al discipline might righteously have inflicted on the offender, would
not the sight of the pain that his conduct had given one who loved
him so tenderly, tell most powerfully in the way of quickening him to
a sense of his wrong-doing? Transfer this to our Elder Brother, the
Mediator with our offended Father in heaven. The exact punish-
ment which our sin entails — remorse, despair, the sting of a torturing
conscience, the felt abiding misery of a soul cut off from the Divine
favor — Jesus could not literally bear. He has, indeed, borne that for
us which has satisfied the Divine justice, and been accepted as a full
and adequate atonement for our transgression ; but may it not have
been that the suffering in our room and stead, which was accepted
of the Father, was part of the suffering which our great sin and his
great love drew down on Mm, who, by linking himself to us by the
tie of a common humanity, laid a brother's heart open to such a sor-
row for our sin as none but the Eternal Son of the Father could have
endured? Surely, in the consideration that it was in such kind of
suffering with and for our sins that the great Atonement of the cross,
in a measure at least, consisted, there is one of the most direct and
powerful appeals — one singularly fitted to touch, to soften, to subdue.
I am very conscious how little anything which has as yet been
said is fitted to throw full or satisfactory light upon that most myste-
rious of all the mysterious sayings of our Lord — the plaintive, lonely,
loud, and bitter cry which emanated from the cross, which, piercing
tihe overhanging darkness, was heard with wonder in the heavens.
It came out of the depth of an anguish that we have no plummet in
our hand to sound: and we become only the more conscious how
unfathomable that depth is, by trying it here and there with the line
of our short-reaching intellect. Instead of hoping to find the bottom
anywhere, let us pause upon the brink ; adoring, wondering, praising
'It is Finished !"
"IT IS FINISHED." 741
that great love of our most gracious Saviour, which has a height and
a depth, a length and a breadth in it, surpassing all human, all an-
gelic measurement :
" Oh, never, never canst thou know
What then for thee the Saviour bore,
The pangs of that mysterious woe
Which wrung his bosom's inmost core.
Yes, man for man perchance may brave
The horrors of the yawning grave ;
And friend for friend, or son for sire,
Undaunted and unmoved expire,
From love, or piety, or pride ;
But who can die as Jesus died ?"
XL
It is Finished,"*
With the arrival of the ninth hour, the outer darkness cleared
away, and with it too the horrors of that inner darkness from whose
troubled bosom the cry at last came forth, " My God, my God ! why
hast thou forsaken me ?" That mental agony, one of whose ingre-
dients — perhaps to us the most intelligible — I have endeavored to
describe, had been endured. The hour for which he came into the
world has run its course ; the cup which with such a trembling hand
he had put to shrinking lips, has been drunk to its dregs ; the powers
of darkness have made on him their last assault, and been repelled ;
the momentary darkness of his Father's countenance has passed
away. As the sun of nature dispels the gloom that for these three
hours had hung around the scene, and sheds once more his illumina-
ting beams upon the cross; even so the light of an answering inward
joy comes to cheer in death the spirit of our Redeemer. It is not in
darkness, whether outward or inward — not in darkness, but in light,
in full, clear, unclouded light, that Jesus dies.
The first, however, and immediate effect of the lifting from his
oppressed and burdened heart that load of inward grief which had
been laid upon it, was a reviving consciousness of his bodily condi-
tion, the awakening of the sensation of a burning thirst. Let the
spirit be thoroughly absorbed by any very strong emotion, and the
bodily sensations are for the time unfelt or overborne, they fail to
attract notice; but let the tide of that overwhelming emotion retreat,
* Matt. 27 : 47-50 ; Mark 15 ■ 35-37 ; Luke 23 : 16 ; John 19 : 28-30.
742 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
and these sensations once more exert their power. In the shock of
battle, the excited combatant may receive his death-wound, and be
unconscious of pain. It is when they lay him down in quiet to die,
that exhausted nature betrays a sense of suffering. So is it, after a
manner, here with Christ. His lips scarce feel their parchedness as
they utter the cry, " My God, my God ! why hast thou forsaken mo ?"
Too full, too agitated, is the soul within, to be keenly alive to bodily
sensations. But now that the relief from inward agony has come,
the cravings of nature return, and first among these the strong desire
■for something to alleviate the thirst. This thirst, however, so far
from entirely engrossing his thoughts, serves but to suggest to the
dying Saviour-^and this shows, as we before remarked, how clear
and calm and self-possessed he was to the very last — that among all
the numerous prophecies which had spoken of the time and manner
of his decease, of his being numbered with transgressors, of the sha-
king of heads, and the shooting out of tongues, the parting of his
garments, the casting lots for his vesture, there still was one (see
Psa. 69) about their giving him in his thirst vinegar to drink, which
remained to be fulfilled. As being, then, at once the natural expres-
sion of the feeling of the moment, and the means of bringing about
the fulfilment of that prophecy, " Jesus said, I thirsty
In saying so, he made an appeal to the sympathy of his crucifiers,
in the belief that they would offer him some of that sour wine, or
vinegar which was the ordinary drink of the Roman soldiers. Did
Jesus know how that appeal would be met and answered? We can-
not but believe he did ; and, if so, it stands out as at once the last
act in point of time, and one of the lowest in point of degree, of that
humiliation before men to which it pleased him to stoop, that he ad-
dressed himself as a petitioner to those who treated his petition as
they did. Let us try to realize what happened around the cross,
immediately after the departure of the three hours' darkness. One
might have expected that the natural awe which that darkness had
undoubtedly inspired ; the moaning cry, as from one deserted, that
came from the cross, as it was rolling away; the fresh sight of Jesus,
upon whose pallid features there lingered the traces of his terrible
agony ; and, last of all, his asking of them to drink — would have con-
spired to awaken pity, or at least to silence scorn. The coming back,
however, of the light — relieving, perhaps, a dread they might have
felt that in the darkness Jesus should escape or be delivered — seems
to have rekindled that fiendish malignity which now found a last and
most demoniac way of expressing itself. " Eli ! Eli !" no Jew could
pos&ibly misunderstand the words, or imagine that they were a call
"it is finished:"' 743
V> Elias for help. The Roman soldiers did not know enough about
Elias to have fallen on any such interpretation. That the words
were taken up, played upon by the bystanders, and turned into a new
instrument of mockery, shows to what a fiendish length of heartless,
pitiless contempt and scorn such passions as those of these scribes
and Pharisees, if unrestrained, will go. One, indeed, of those around
the cross appears to have been touched with momentary pity, per-
haps a Roman soldier, who, when he heard Jesus say, "I thirst," and
looked upon his pale, parched lips, ran and took a stalk of hyssop.
From what we know of the size of the plant, this stalk could not have
been much above two feet long, but it was long enough to reach the
lips of Jesus, the feet of a person crucified not being ordinarily ele-
vated more than a foot or two above the ground. This circumstance
explains to us how close to the crucified the soldiers must have stood;
how near many of the outstanding crowd may have been ; how natu-
ral and easy it was for Jesus to speak to Mary and John as he did.
To that stalk of hyssop the man attached a sponge, and, dipping it
in the vessel of vinegar, that stood at hand, was putting it to the
Saviour's lips, when the mocking crowd cried out, " Let be ; let us
see whether Elias will come to save him." This did not stop him
from giving Jesus, in his thirst, vinegar to drink. The ancient proph-
ecy he must unconsciously fulfil; but it did serve to half-extin-
guish the prompting upon which he had begun to act, and induce
him to take up into his own lips, and to repeat the current mockery,
"Let us see whether Elias will come to take him down."
When Jesus had received the vinegar, he said, " It is finished!" It
does not fall in with the character or purpose of these remarks, in-
tended to be as purely as possible expository, to take up this mem-
orable expression of our dying Lord, and use it as a text out of
which a full exposition of the doctrine of the cross might be derived.
Rather, as being more in accordance with our present design, let us
endeavor to conceive of, and to enter into, as far as it is possible, the
spirit and meaning of the expression as employed by our Lord upon
the cross.
First, then, as coming at this time from the Saviour's lips, it
betokens an inward and deep sensation of relief, repose; relief from
a heavy burden; repose after a toilsome labor. To the bearing of
that burden, the endurance of that toil, Jesus had long and anxiously
looked forward. From that time, if time it may be called, when he
undertook the high office of the Mediatorship, from the beginning,
even from everlasting, through the vista of the future, the cross of
his last agony had risen up before his all-seeing eye, as the object
744 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
towards which, notwithstanding the dark shadows cast befoie it, th
thought of his spirit stretched forward. In what manner and with
what feeling it was regarded by him in the period which preceded
his incarnation, it becomes us not to speak, as we have no means of
judging ; but we can mark how he felt regarding it after he became &
man.
In the earlier period of his ministry, Christ practised a strict re-
serve in speaking of his death. In spite, however, of that self-im-
posed restraint, broken hints were ever and anon dropping from his
lips, sounding quite strange and enigmatical in the ears to which
they were addressed. " I have a baptism," said he to his disciples,
"to be baptized with, and how am I straitened till it be accomplish-
ed !" When, near the end of his ministry, the necessity for reserve
was removed, Jesus spoke openly about his coming death, and always
in such a way as to convey the very deepest impression of the pro-
found interest with which he himself contemplated beforehand that
great event. So eagerly did he look forward to it, so striking an in-
fluence had that prospect even upon his outward aspect and move-
ments, that when, for the last time, he set his face to go up to Jeru-
salem, and all the things that were to happen to him there came
rushing into his mind, he "went before" the twelve, as if impatient
to get forward. They were amazed, we are told, as he did so ; and
as they followed him, and gazed upon him, they were afraid. The
reason of this rapid gait and strange expression he revealed, when he
took them apart by the way, and told them what his thoughts had
been dwelling on. There was but one occasion on which he could
freely and intelligibly speak out the sentiments of his heart : it was
when he stood with Moses and Elias on the mount, and there, even
when invested with the glories of transfiguration, the decease which
he was to accomplish at Jerusalem was the one chosen topic of dis-
course. As the time drew near, still oftener was that great decease
before his thoughts; still heavier did its impending weight appear to
press upon his spirit. It was not, it could not be any mere ordinary
human death that so occupied the thoughts of Jesus Christ. We
have previously endeavored to make it apparent to you that the
true, the real sufferings of that death lay in another, far deeper region
than that to which the ordinary pangs of bodily dissolution belong ;
and we cannot but. believe that that internal conflict, that inner
agony of soul, reserved for the last days and hours of our Redeemer's
life, was broken, as it were, into parts, distributed between the temple,
the garden, the cross, for the very purpose of making it palpable, even
to the eye of the ordinary observer, that the sufferings of the Re~
;
"IT IS FINISHED." 746
deeiner's soul formed, as has been well said, the very soul of his suf-
ferings. And when those mysterious sufferings, so long looked
forward to, at last were over, the load borne and lifted off, with what
a deep inward feeling of relief and repose must Jesus have said, "It
is finished!"
Secondly, connecting this expression with what went so imme-
diately before — our Lord's remembrance of all that was needful to
be done to him and by him in dying, in order that the Scriptures
might be fulfilled — it may reasonably be assumed that he meant
thereby to declare the final close and completion of that long series
of types and prophecies of his death which crowd the pages of the
Old Testament Scriptures. In the very number and variety of these
types and prophecies, another attestation meets our eye to the preemi-
nent importance of that event to which they point. If you take the
twenty-four hours which embrace the last night and day of our Re-
deemer's life, you will find that more frequent and more minute preinti-
mations of what occurred throughout their course are to be found in
the prophetic pages, than of what happened in any other equal period
in the history of our globe. The seemingly trifling character of some
of the incidents which are made the subjects of prophecy at first
surprises us ; but that surprise changes into wonder as we perceive
that they fix our attention upon the death of Jesus Christ, as the
central incident of this world's strange history, the one around which
the whole spiritual government of this earth revolves. By all those
promises and prophecies, those typical persons and typical events
and typical services, the raising of the altar, the slaying of the sacri-
fice, the institution of the priesthood, the ark with its broken tables
and sprinkled mercy-seat, the passover, the great day of aionement,
the passage of the high priest within the veil ; by the voice of God
himself speaking, in the first promise, about the seed of the woman,
and the bruising of his heel ; by the wonderful Psalms of David, in
which the general description of the suffering righteous man passes
into those minute details which were embodied in the crucifixion ;
by those rapt utterances of Isaiah, some portions of which read
now more like histories of the past than intimations of the future —
the eye of this world's hope was turned to that event beforehand, as
backward to it the eye of the world's faith has ever since been
directed.
But, thirdly, that we may make our way into the very heart of
iU meaning, does not the expression, "It is finished," suggest the
idea af a prescribed, a distinct, a definite work, brought to a final,
satisfactory, and triumphant conclusion? Spoken in no boastful
746 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
spirit, it is the language of one who, having had a great commission
given him, a great task assigned, announces that the commission has
been executed, the task fulfilled. Taking it as the simple announce-
ment of the fact, that some great transaction was brought to its con-
summation, we ask ourselves, as we contemplate the entire circle of
Jie Redeemer's services to our race, still running out their course,
what part of these services was it of which it could be said that it
was then finished ? Here, in the foreground, we have to put that one
and perfect sacrifice which he offered up for the sin of the world.
Through the Eternal Spirit, he offered himself without spot to God,
and by that one sacrifice for sin, once for all, he hath perfected for
ever those that are sanctified ; he hath done all that was needed to
atone for human guilt, to redeem us from the curse of the law, to
finish transgression, to make an end of sin, to make reconciliation for
iniquity.
But again, Christ's death upon the cross brought to a close that
obedience to the Divine law, that perfect fulfilment of all the righte-
ousness which is required ; held out to us as the ground upon which
we are to find immediate and full acceptance with our Maker. "As
by one man's disobedience many were made sinners; so by the obe-
dience of one shall many be made righteous." " He made him to be
sin for us who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness
of God in him." "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory
of God : being justified freely by his grace, through the redemption
that is in Christ Jesus ; whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation
through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remis-
sion of sins that are past; to declare, I say, at this time his righteous-
ness; that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth
in Jesus."
Farther still — though embraced indeed in the two particulars of
the sufferings and services of the Redeemer already mentioned—
there was finished upon the cross the new, the full, the wonderful
revelation of the Father, that unbosoming of the Eternal, the open
ing up to us of the very heart of the Godhead, the exhibition of the
mingled love and holiness of our Father who is in heaven. There
was completed then that glorious, that attractive, that subduing man-
ifestation of the love of God for sinful men, which carried the. Divine
Being to the extreme length of suffering and of self-sacrifice, and
which has ever formed the most powerful of all instruments for
pacifying the conscience, melting the heart, moulding the character,
renewing and sanctifying the will.
Whether, then, he looked up to God, and thought of his having
"IT IS FINISHED." 747
glorified his name, finished the work that had been given him to do ;
or whether he looked down to man, and thought of the saving power
which his cross was to exert over millions upon millions of the
human family, it may well have been to Jesus Christ a moment oi
intensest joy, when — his latest pang endured, his last service render-
ed, his strictly vicarious work completed — he exclaimed, "It is
finished!"
To Jesus Christ alone was given that joy in dying which springs
from the knowledge that all the ends of living and dying had been
perfectly answered. Looking upon the career he had pursued, he
could see not a single blot nor blank space in the whole. Of what
other man, cut off as he was in the midst of his years, could the
same be said? When good and great men die in the full flush of
their manhood, the full vigor of their powers, we are apt to mourn
the untimely stroke that has laid them low, that has cut short so
many of the undertakings they were engaged in, deprived the world
of so much service that it was in their heart to have rendered. Nor
can any such look back upon the past without this humbling feeling
in the retrospect, that many an offence has been committed, many a
duty left imperfectly discharged. But for us there is no place for
mourning, as we contemplate the death of our Redeemer, which came
to close the one and only life which, stainless throughout its every
hour, did so thoroughly and to the last degree of the Divine require-
ment accomplish all that had been intended. And for him it was as
if the cup of bitterness having been drunk, the cry of agony as he
drained the last drop of it having been uttered, there was given to
him, even before he died, to taste a single drop of that other cup —
that cup of full ecstatic bliss, which the contemplation of the travail
of his soul, of the glory it rendered to the Father, the good it did to
man, shall never cease to yield.
But to what practical use are we to turn this declaration of our
dying Saviour? He rested complacently, gratefully, exultingly, in
the thought that his work for us was finished. Shall we not try to
enter into the full meaning of this great saying ? Shall we not try,
in the way in which it becomes us, to enter with him into that same
rest? For the forgiveness, then, of all our sins, for our acceptance
with a holy and righteous God, let us put our sole, immediate, and
entire trust upon this finished work of our Eedeemer; let us beliovo,
that whatever obstacles our guilt threw in the way of our being
received back into the Divine favor, have been removed ; that what-
ever the holiness of the lawgiver, and the integrity of his law, and
the moral interests of his government required in the way of atone-
748 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
ment or expiation, has been rendered. Let us look upon the way of
access to God as lying quite open to us ; let us take the pardon ; let
us enter into peace with God ; let us bring all our guilt and bury it
in the depths of his atonement. Let us lay hold of the righteous-
ness of Christ, and clothe ourselves with it in the Divine presence ;
and regarding the reconciliation with God, effected by the death of
his dear Son, as only the first step or stage of the Christian salvation,
let us throw open our whole mind and heart to the blessed influences
that Christ's love, his life, his sufferings, his death, his entire exam-
ple were intended to exert in making us less selfish, more loving, more
dutiful, more thankful, more submissive, more holy.
There still remain, for one or two brief remarks, these last words
of our Kedeemer: "Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit."
The words are borrowed from one of the Psalms. Jesus dies with a
passage of the old Hebrew Scriptures on his lips, only he prefaces
the words by the epithet so familiar to his lips and heart, " Father."
In the depth of his bitter anguish, under the darkness of momentary
desolation, he had dropped this phrase. It had been then, " My
God, my God !" But now, once more, in the light that shines with-
in, around, he resumes it, and he says, " Father, into thy hands I
commit my spirit." If the saying which went before, "It is finished,"
be taken, as it well may be, as Christ's last word of farewell to the
world he leaves behind, this may be taken as his first word of greet-
ing to the new world that he is about to enter. New world, we say,
for though, as the Eternal Son, he was but returning to the glory
that he had with the Father before the world was, let us not forget
that death was to the humanity of the Lord — as it will be to each
and all of us — an entrance upon a new and untried state. It seems
to us as if, in these last words of our Elder Brother, it was that na-
ture of ours he wore which breathed itself forth in our hearing ; that
human nature which, when the hour of departure comes, looks out
with trembling solicitude into the world of spirits, seeking for some
one there into whose hands the departing spirit may confidently com-
mit itself. In the "It is finished," the voice of the great High Priest,
the Eternal Son of the Father, predominates. In the " Father, into
thy hands I commit my spirit," is it not the voice of the man Christ
Jesus that mainly salutes our ear? No timidity, indeed, nor fear,
nor any such trembling awe as any of us might fitly feel in dying.
Nothing of these ; not a shadow of them here ; yet certainly solem-
nity, concern, the sense as of a need of some support, some upbear-
ing hand. And shall we not thank our Saviour, that not only has he
made the passage before us, and opened for us, in doing so, the gate
THE ATTENDANT MIRACLES. 749
to eternal life, but taught us, by his own example, not jo wonder if
our weak human nature, as it stands upon the brink, should look out
with an eager solicitude to find the hands into which, in making the
great transition, it may throw itself ?
And where shall we find those hands ? He found them in the
hands of that Father, who at all times had been so well pleased with
him. We find them in his hands who went thus before us to his
Father and our Father, to his God and our God. He too found them
there who has left us the earliest example how a true Christian may
and ought to die. Considering the small number of the Lord's disci-
ples, we may believe that Stephen was not only the first of the Chris-
tian martyrs, but actually the first after the crucifixion who fell asleep
in Jesus. Can we doubt that in dying the last words of Jesus were
in Stephen's memory ? There had been too many points of resem-
blance between his own and his Master's trial and condemnation, for
Stephen not to have the close of the Kedeemer's life before his mind.
His dying prayer is an echo of that which came from his Master's
lips; the same, yet changed. It might do for the sinless one to say,
" Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit." It is not for the sin-
ful to take up at once and appropriate such words ; so, turning to
Jesus, the dying martyr says, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit," in thai
simple, fervent, confiding petition, leaving behind him, for all ages,
the pattern of a sinner's dying prayer, modelled upon the last words
of the dying Saviour.
XII.
The Attendant Miracles.*
In all its outward form and circumstance, there scarcely could
have been a lowlier entrance into this world of ours than that made
by Jesus Christ. The poorest wandering gypsy's child has seldom
had a meaner birth. There was no room for Mary in the inn. She
brought forth her firstborn son amid the beasts of the stall, and she
laid him in a manger. But was that birth — which, though it had so
little about it to draw the notice of man, was yet the greatest that
this earth has ever witnessed — to pass by without any token of its
greatness givfm ? No ; other eyes than those of men were fixed on
it, and other tongues were loosened to celebrate it. The glory of the
* Mutt. 27 : 51-54 ; Mark 15 : 39 ; Luke 23 : 47-49 ; John 19 : 31 37.
750 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Lord shone around the shepherds, and the multitude of the heavenly
host, borrowing for a time the speech of Canaan, filled the midnight
sky with their praises as they chanted, " Glory to God in the highest,
and on earth peace, goodwill toward men." Never was there a low-
lier cradle than that in which the new-born Redeemer lay ; but over
what other cradle was there ever such a birth-hymn sung?
And as with the birth, so also with the death of Jesus. In all its
outward form and circumstance, a more humiliating death than that
of being crucified as one of three convicted felons, he could not have
died. There was no darker, more degrading passage through which
he could have been sent forth from among the living. But was that
death of the Eternal Son of God to have no outward marks of its
importance imprinted on it ? Left to man, there had been none ; but
heaven will not let it pass unsignalized. And so, at mid-day the
darkness came and settled for three hours around the cross; and
when at the ninth hour Jesus gave up the ghost, the veil of the tem-
ple was torn in twain from the top to the bottom, and the rocks rent,
and the graves opened. These were the external seals which the
hand of the Omnipotent stamped upon the event, proclaiming its
importance. But these seals were also symbols; they were more
than mere preternatural indications that this was no common death.
Each in its way told something about the character and object of
this death. The mystery of those hidden sufferings of the Redeem-
er's spirit — the inner darkening of the light of his Father's counte-
nance — stood shadowed forth in the three hours' darkness. The
rending of the veil had a meaning of its own, which it scarcely need-
ed an apostle to interpret. To the few eyes that witnessed it, it must
have been a most mysterious spectacle. Jesus died at the third hour
after mid- day; the very hour when eager crowds of worshippers
would be thronging into the courts of the temple, and all would be
preparing for the evening sacrifice. Within the holy place, kindling
perhaps the many lights of the golden candlestick, some priests would
be busy before the inner veil which hung between them and the holy
of holies; that veil no thin, old, time-worn piece of faded drapery,
but fresh and strong, and thickly woven, for they renewed it year by
year ; that holy of holies — the dark, secluded apartment within which
lay the ark of the covenant, with the cherubim above it shadowing
the mercy-seat, which no mortal footstep was permitted to invade,
save that of the high priest once only every year. How strange, how
awful to the ministering priests, standing before that veil, to feel the
earth tremble beneath their feet, and to see the strong veil grasped,
as if by two unseen hands of superhuman strength, ami torn down in
THE ATTENDANT MIEACLES 751
the middle from top to bottom — the glaring light of day, that never,
for long centuries gone by, had entered there, flung into that sacred
tenement, and all its mysteries laid open to vulgar gaze. The Holy
Ghost by all this signified that while as yet that first tabernacle was
standing, the way into the holiest, the access to God, was not yet
made manifest ; but now, Christ being come, to offer himself without
spot to God, neither by the blood of goats nor calves, but by his own
blood, to enter into the true holy of holies — even as he died on Cal-
vary that veil was rent asunder thus within the temple to teach us
that a new and living way, open to all, accessible to all, had been
consecrated for us through the rending of the Redeemer's flesh, that
we might have boldness to enter into the holiest, and might draw
near, each one of us, to God, with a new heart and in full assurance
of faith. Little of all this may those few priests have known who
stood that day gazing with awe-struck wonder upon that working of
the Divine and unseen hand — to them a sign of terror, rather than a
symbol of what the death on Calvary had done. We read, however,
that not long afterwards — within a year — many priests became obe-
dient unto the faith; and it pleases us to think that among those
who, from the inner heart of Judaism, from the stronghold of its
priestly caste, were converted unto Christ, some of those may have
been numbered whose first movement in that direction was given
them as they witnessed that rending of the veil, that laying open of
the most holy place.
" And the earth did quake : and the rocks rent ; and the graves
trere opened" — the main office, let us believe, of that earthquake
which accompanied, or immediately followed upon the death of
Christ — not to strike terror into the hearts of men; not to herald
judgments upon this earth ; not to swallow up the living in its open-
ing jaws; no, but to shake the domains of death; to break the
stony fetters of the dead; to lay open the graves, out of which the
bodies of the saints might arise. It seems clear enough, from the
words which Matthew uses — who is the only one of the evangelists
who alludes to the event — that they did not come out of their graves
till the morning of our Lord's own resurrection. It is scarcely con-
ceivable that they had been reanimated before that time, and lain
awake in their graves till his rising called them from their tombs.
Then they did arise, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto
many — one, certainly, of the most mysterious incidents which attend-
ed the death and resurrection of the Saviour, suggesting many a
question : Who were they that thus arose ? were they of the recent ly
dead, recognized by loving relatives in the holy city; or were they
752 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
chosen from the buried of many bygone generations ? Did they
return to their sepulchres, or did the grave never more close ovei
them ? Did they, after a brief appearance in the holy city, pass into
the heavenly Jerusalem ? or did they linger upon this earth, to be
the companions of our Lord during those forty days, so small a por-
tion of which is occupied by Christ's appearance to his disciples, the
rest spent where and how we know not ; and did they, that ministry
to Jesus over, go up with him into the heavenly places ? All about
them is hid in the deepest obscurity. Like shadows they come, like
shadows they depart. This, however, their presence told, that the
voice which from the cross cried, " It is finished," went where sound
of human voice had never gone before, and did what sound of human
voice had never done. It was heard among the dead ; it stirred the
heavy sleepers there, and piercing the stony sepulchre, went quiver-
ing into ears long sealed against all sound. And when the third
morning dawned, these bodies of the saints arose, to complete as it
were the pledge and promise of the general resurrection of the dead
which our Lord's own rising carried with it, and having done that
office, silently and mysteriously withdrew. You may have sometimes
seen a day in early spring, stolen from the coming summer, a day of
sunshine so bright and warm, of air so bland, of breeze so gentle,
that, as if fancying that her resurrection-time had come, dead nature
woke, buds began to burst, flower leaves to unfold, and birds to
sing — all to be shut up again in death, as the bleak withering winds
of days that followed swept across the plain. Even into such a day
did the appearance of these old tenants of the grave turn that of our
Lord's resurrection, lightening and enriching it with the promise of
the time when all that are in their graves shall hear Christ's voice,
and his full and final victory over death and the grave shall be accom-
plished.
Mark the evangelist, to whom we are indebted for so many minute
and graphic incidents in the gospel history, tells us that at the mo-
ment when Christ expired, the Roman officer in charge was standing
over against him, within a few yards of the cross, gazing on the face
of the Crucified. He had halted there as the darkness rolled away
He heard that loud and piercing cry, as of one forsaken, come from
the lips of Jesus. He saw the change come over the Saviour's coun-
tenance, the light that spread over those pallid features, the joy that
beamed from those uplifted eyes. Another and a louder cry — not
now the cry as of one sinking in conflict, bat of one rejoicing in vic-
tory — when suddenly Jesus bows his head and gives up the ghost ;
that moment, too, the earthquake shook the earth, and the cross of
THE ATTENDANT MIRACLES. 763
Jesus trembled before the Romans eyes. The shaking earth, the
trembling cross, impressed him less, as Mark lets us know, than the
loud cry so instantly followed by death. He had, perhaps, been
present at other crucifixions, and- knew well how long the band he
ruled was ordinarily required to watch the crucified. But he had
never seen, he had never known, he had never heard of a man dying
upon a cross within six hours. He had seen other men expire ; had
watched weak nature as it wanes away at death — the voice sinking
into feebleness with its last efforts at articulation- -but he had never
heard a man in dying speak in tones like these. And so impressed
was he with what he saw and heard, that instantly and spontaneously
he exclaimed, " Truly this man was the Son of God !" Foreignei
and Gentile as he was, he may have attached no higher meaning to
the epithet than Pilate did when he said to Jesus, " Art thou then
the Son of God ?" This much, however, he meant to say, that truly
and to his judgment this Jesus was more than human — was divine —
was that very Son of God, whatever this might mean, which these
Jews had condemned him for claiming to be. Such was the faith so
quickly kindled in this Gentile breast. The cross is early giving
tokens of its power. It lays hold of the dying thief, and opens to
him the gates of paradise. It lays hold of this centurion, and works
in him a faith which, let us hope, deepened into a trust in Jesus as
his Saviour. From such unlikely quarters came the two testimonies
borne to the Lord's divinity the day he died.
The centurion speaks of him as one already dead. The pale face
and the drooping head tell all the lookers-on that he has breathed
his last. The great interest of the day is over; the crowd breaks
up; group after group returning to Jerusalem, in very different
mood and temper from that in which they had come out a few hours
before. It had been little more at first than an idle curiosity which
had drawn many of those onlookers that morning from their dwell-
ings. Cherishing, perhaps, no particular ill-will to Jesus, they had
joined the procession on its way to Calvary. They gather by the
way that this Jesus had been convicted as a pretender, who had
impiously claimed to be their king, their Christ. They see how
irritated the high priests and their followers are at him. It is an
unusual thing for these magnates of the people to come out, as they
t'ow are doing, to attend a public execution. There must surely be
something peculiarly criminal in this Jesus, against whom their
enmity is so bitter. Soon these new-comers catch the spirit that
tneir rulers have breathed into the crowd, and for the first three
hours they heartily chime in with the others, and keep up fcheii
75i THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
mockeiy of the crucified. But from the moment that the darkne«a
falls upon them, what a change! There thej stand, silently peering
through the gloom ; no jest nor laughter now, nor strife of mocking
tongues. Ipon that cross, but dimly seen, their eyes are fixed,
The wonder grows as to how all this shall end. It ends with thoso
prodigies that accompany the death. Appalled by these, they smite
upon their breasts — as Easterns do in presence of all superhuman
power — and make their way back to their homes; no noisy, shouting
rabble, but each man silent, and full of thought and awe. Who or
what, then, could that Jesus be whom they had seen die such a
death — at whose death the whole frame of nature seemed to quiver?
Whatever he was, he was not what their rulers had told them. No
false, deceitful man, no impious pretender. Was he then indeed
their Christ, their king ? They got the answer to those questions a
few weeks later, when Peter preached to that great company on the
day of Pentecost; and may we not believe that among those who
listened to the great apostle on that occasion, and to whom he spake
as to the very men who, with wicked hands, had slain the Lord of
glory, there were not a few of those who now returned to Jerusalem
from Calvary, impressed and half-convinced, waiting but the work
of the Spirit to turn them into true and faithful followers of the
Crucified?
Such was the impression made upon the Horn an officer, and on a
section of the bystanders. But the high priests and then 1 minions,
the true crucifiers of the Lord— what impression has all which has
happened thus at Calvary made on them ? Has it stirred any doubt,
has it awakened any compunction, has it allayed their fears or
quenched their hate? No; they witness all these wonders, and
remain hard and unrelenting as at the first. Speaking of that
obduracy, which stood out against all the demonstrations of the
Lord's divinity, St. Gregory exclaims : " The heavens knew him,
and forthwith sent out a star and a company of angels to sing his
birth. The sea knew him, and made itself a way to be trodden by
his feet; the earth knew him, and trembled at his dying; the fjun
knew him, and hid the rays of his light; the rocks knew him, for
they were rent in twain ; Hades knew him, and gave up the dead
it had received. But though the senseless elements perceived him
to be their Lord, the hearts of the unbelieving Jews knew him not
as God, and, harder than the very rocks, were not rent by repent
ance."
The only effect upon the rulers of the Jewish people of the
sadden death of Jesus was to set them thinking how the crosses and
THE ATTENDANT MIKACLES. 756
bodies which hung upon them might most speedily be removed.
Their own Jewish code forbade that the body of one hung upon
a tree should remain over a single night: "His body shall not
remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him
that day, that thy land be not defiled." See Deut. 21. As cruci-
fixion was a mode of punishment originally unknown among the
Jews, this command refers to the case of those who, after death by
stoning or strangulation, were hung upon a gibbet. The Roman
law and practice were different. Crucifixion was the mode of death
to which slaves and the greater criminals were doomed. In ordinary
circumstances, the bodies of the crucified were suffered to hang upon
the cross till the action of the elements, at times otherwise aided and
accelerated, wasted them away. Even when sepulture was allowed,
it was thought profitable for the ends of justice that for some days
the frightful spectacle should be exposed to the public eye. In no
case under the Roman rule did burial take place on the very day of
the execution. If that rule were in this instance to be broken, it
must be under the special leave and direction of Pilate. Besides,
however, the natural desire that their own rather than the Roman
method of dealing with the crucified should be followed, there was
another and more special reason why the Jews desired that the
bodies should as quickly as possible be removed. Next day was the
Sabbcth; no common Sabbath either — the Sabbath of the great
Paschal festival. It began at sunset. Only an hour or two remained.
It would be offensive, ill-ominous, if on a day so sacred three bodies
hanging upon crosses should be exhibited so near the holy city. It
would disturb, defile the services of the holy day. Besides, who
could tell what effect upon the changeful, excitable multitude this
spectacle of Jesus might have, if kept so long before their eyes? A
deputation is despatched, therefore, to Pilate, to entreat him to give
orders that means may be taken to expedite the death by crucifixion,
and have the bodies removed. Pilate accedes to the request; the
necessary order is forwarded to Calvary, and the soldiers proceed in
the ordinary way to execute it. They break the legs of both the
others; they pass Jesus by. There is every sign, indeed, that he is
already dead, but why not make his death thus doubly sure ? Per-
haps, even over the spirits of those rough ard hardened men, the
Saviour's looks and words, the manner of his death, the darkness
and the earthquake, which they connected in some way with hi in,
may have caused a feeling of awe to creep, restraining them froifi
subjecting him to that rough handling which they were ready
enough to give to the others. However this may have been, the
756 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
shield of that prophecy — "A bone of him shall not be broken/
guarded his limbs from their rude and crushing strokes.
One, indeed, of the soldiers is not to be restrained, and to make
sure that this seeming death is real, he lifts his spear as he passes
by, and thrusts it into the Kedeemer's side; a strong, rude thrust,
sufficient of itself to have caused death, inflicting a wide, deep
wound, that left behind such a scar, that Jesus could say to Thomas
afterwards, "Keach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side."
From that wound there flowed out blood and water, in such quan-
tity, that the outflow attracted the special notice of John, who was
standing at some distance from the cross; the blood and the water
so distinct and distinguishable from one another, that this observoj
could not be deceived, and thought it right to leave behind him this
peculiarly emphatic testimony: "He that saw it, bare record, and
his record is true; ard he knoweth that he saith true, thai ye might
believe." It has been thought that John was led to put such stress
upon this incident of the crucifixion, and to press into such prom-
inence his own testimony as an eye-witness to its reality, on account
of the convincing refutation thus afforded of two strange heresies
that sprung up early in the church : the first, that Jesus never really
died upon the cross, but only passed into a swoon, from which he
afterwards revived; and the second, that it was not a real human
body of flesh and blood, but only the appearance of one that was
suspended on the cross. It may have been that the evangelist had
these beliefs in view. But whatever was his immediate object in
testifying so particularly and so earnestly to the fact, it only puts
that fact so much the more clearly now before our eyes, authorizing
us to assume it as placed beyond all doubt, that within an hour or
so after Christ's death — for it could not have been much longer,
when a deep incision was made in the side of the Eedeemer, there
visibly flowed forth a copious stream of blood and water. Is that
fact of any moment, does it give any clue to, or throw any light
upon the proximate or physical cause of the death of Christ ? The
answer to these questions we reserve for the present.
Meanwhile, let us give a moment or two more to reflection upon
that strange variety of impression and the effect which the cruci-
fixion of our Lord had upon the original spectators. There were
those whom that spectacle plunged into a despondency bordering
on despair. Mary, the mother of our Lord was not able to bear
that sight, and the love of her divine Son went forth, and withdrew
her early from the trial of seeing him expire. His other acquain-
tance, and the women that followed him from Galilee, stood afar o^
THE ATTENDANT MIRACLES. 757
beholding; half ashamed and half afraid; with something of hope,
with more of fear; lost in wonder that he, about whom they had
been cherishing such grand, yet false and earthly expectations,
should suffer himself, or should be suffered by that Father — of whom
he had so often spoken as hearing him always, who had himself
declared that he was at all times well pleased with him — to die such
a death as this. As the darkness fell, perhaps a new hope sprung
up within some of their breasts. Was Jesus about to use that dark-
ness as a veil behind which he would withdraw himself, as he had
withdrawn himself from those who were about to cast him from the
rocky height at Nazareth ? Had he gone up to that cross to work
there the greatest of his miracles ? and was he in very deed about to
meet the taunt of his enemies, and come down from the cross that
they might believe in him ? Alas ! if any such hope arose, the ninth
hour quenched it; and when they saw him draw his latest breath, this
band of friends and followers of Jesus turned their backs on Calvary,
with slow, sad footsteps to return, dispirited and disconsolate, to
their homes. Mainly this was owing to the strength of that preju-
dice which had so early taken such strong possession of their minds,
that the kingdom which their new Master was to set up was a tem-
poral one. To that prejudice so sudden and so overwhelming a
shock was given by the crucifixion, that, stunned and stupefied by it,
ihese simple-minded followers of Jesus were for a time unable to
recall, and unprepared to believe, his own predictions as to his
death. Upon the scribes and Pharisees, the chief priests and rulers
of the people, the six hours of the crucifixion had, as we have seen,
none other than a hardening effect. The gentleness, the patience,
the forgiving spirit, the thoughtfulness for others, the sore trouble of
his own spirit, the supernatural darkness, the returning light, the
sudden and sublime decease, the reeling earth, the opening graves —
all these, which might have moved them, had they not been pos-
sessed by the one great passion of quenching for ever the hated pre-
tensions of this Nazarene — have no other influence upon their spirits
than quickening their ingenuity to contrive how best, most quickly,
and most securely, they can accomplish their design. And these
are they of all that motley crowd, who knew the most, and made the
greatest profession of religion ! These are the men who would not
that morning cross the threshold of Pilate's dwelling, lest they might
anfit themselves for the morrow's duties within the temple ! These
are the men who cannot bear the thought that the services of their
great Paschal Sabbath should be polluted by the proximity of the
three crosses of Golgotha ! They can spill, without compunction,
r
758 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
the blood of the innocent. They can take that olood upon them-
selves and upon their children, but they cannot suffer the sight of it
to offend their eye as they go up to worship upon Mount Zion.
These are the men who, in their deep self-ignorance, in their proud
and boastful spirit, were wont to say, "If we had been in the days of
our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the
blood of the prophets." These are the men whose whole character
and conduct are suggestive of the likenesses to themselves that have
arisen in every age of the church, one of whose noted peculiarities is
ever this, that to wound their pride, or expose in any way their
hollow pretensions, is sure to draw down on all who attempt the
dangerous office the very same malignity of dislike and persecution
that nailed our Saviour to his cross.
Upon many of the crowd which stood for those six hours around
the cross, the events that transpired there appear to have produced
that surprise, solemnity, alarm, and subdued state of feeling, they
were so fitted to produce on the bulk of mankind. We have already
ventured to express the hope that, with not a few of them, what they
saw and heard prepared their minds and opened their hearts to
receive the good seed which, scattered on the day of Pentecost by
apostolic hands, was so watered with the influences of the Holy
Spirit.
But are we wrong in imagining, of another and perhaps still
larger proportion of those who returned, beating their breasts, to
Jerusalem, that a few days, or a few weeks, brought them down to
their ordinary and natural condition of indifference and unconcern ?
Yes, they would say, that was a wonderful forenoon; there was a
strange occurrence of striking things about the close of that strange
man's life ; but to any further inquiry after him — the lending their
ears to that gospel which set him forth as crucified to redeem their
souls from death, and cover, by his mediation, the multitude of
their sins — they became too callous, the world had too strong a hold
of them, to admit of their giving any further or more earnest heed.
Have not these, too, their likenesses among us? men capable of
strong but temporary impressions. Bring them to Golgotha, set up
the cross before them, let them see the Saviour die, and their breasts
may own a sentiment akin to that which affected so many personally
at Calvary: but they are morning clouds those feelings, it is an early
dew this softening of their hearts ; let the bright sun rise, the fresh
breeze blow ; let the day, with so many calls to business and pleas-
ure come, and those clouds vanish — this dew disappears. And yet
the cross was not to be lifted up in vain. It hardened the Pharisees,
PHYSICAL CAUSE OF THE DEATH OF CHKIST. 759
it dispirited the disciples, it awed the multitude; but it saved the
penitent thief, and it convinced the unprejudiced centurion. "I,"
said the Lord himself, contemplating beforehand the triumph of his
cross — "I, if I be lifted up, will draw all men unto me." And when
he was lifted up, even before he died, and in the very act of dying,
he drew to him that Gentile and that Jew, each one the leader of a
multitude that no man may number, upon whom the power of that
attraction has since acted. God grant that upon all our spirits this
power may come, drawing us to Jesus now, and lifting us at last to
heaven.
XIII.
The Physical Cause of the Death of Christ.*
Had no one interfered, the body of our Lord had been taken
down by the soldiers from the cross, by their cold and careless hands
to be conveyed away to one of those separate burying-places reserved
for those who had suffered the extreme penalty of the law. Not
unfrequently, in such cases, friends or relatives came forward to
crave the body at the hands of the authorities, that they might give
it a more becoming burial. There was but one exception, the case of
those whose crime was treason against the state — the very crime for
which Christ had, nominally at least, been condemned. In that
instance the mode of disposal of the body prescribed by law was
rarely if ever departed from. But where are there any friends or
relatives of Jesus in condition hopefully to interfere ? That small
band of his acquaintance, which had stood throughout the crucifixion
beholding it afar off, is composed principally of women. John, in-
deed, is there, a witness of the closing scene, and of the preparation
made for the removal of the bodies. But was Pilate, to whom appli-
cation must of course be made, likely to listen to any petition that he
might present ? John knew something of the high priest, but noth-
ing of the Koman governor. There was everything in fact to dis-
courage him from making any application in that quarter, even if the
idea of doing so had occurred to him. But it is most unlikely that it
had. For what could John, or the disciples generally, have done
with the body of their Master though they had got it into their hands ?
It must be buried quickly — within an hour or so. And where could
* John 19 : 33-35 ; Mark 15 : 42-45.
f
760 THE LIFE OE CHRIST.
these Galilean strangers find a grave at Jerusalem to lay it in, where
but in some exposed and public place of sepulture, unsuitable for the
destiny in store for it ?
At the fitting' time, the fit instrument appears. Joseph of Arima-
fchea, a rich man, an honorable councillor, a member of the Sanhedrim,
Well known as such to Pilate, has either himself been present at the
srucifixion, or hears how matters stand. Shall the body of Jesus
pass into the rough hands of these Roman soldiers, and be dragged
by them to a dishonored burial ? Not if he can hinder it. He has a
new sepulchre of his own, close by the very place where Christ has
died, whose very nearness to the spot suggests to him how suitable a
place it would be for so sacred a deposit. Joseph goes instantly to
Pilate, and boldly asks that the body may be given to him. Pilate
makes no difficulty regarding the alleged crime of Jesus. He never
had believed that Christ was guilty of treason against Caesar's gov-
ernment; does not now act on any such assumption. But Joseph
has told him something about the time and manner of the Saviour's
death which he had not heard before, which greatly amazes and
induces him to hesitate. Those Jews who had come to him a short
time before, with the request that he would issue an order that the
bones of the three might be broken and their bodies removed, must
have come to him after the three hours' darkness, after the death of
Christ. But they had told him nothing about that death. They
had spoken as if the same means for expediting their decease had to
be taken with all the three. Now, for the first time, he hears that
Jesus had, even then, breathed his last ; had died just as that myste-
rious darkness, which had troubled Pilate as it had troubled the
crowd at Golgotha, had rolled away ; as that earthquake, which had
shaken every dwelling in Jerusalem, had been felt within his resi-
dence. Pilate will not believe it — can scarcely credit Joseph's story —
must have a thing so strange attested upon better testimony. Wai-
ving, in the meantime, all answer to Joseph's request, he sends for
the centurion, who, doubtless, told him all that he had witnessed;
told him about the loud voice, and the immediately succeeding death ;
told him what raised in the eyes of these two Bomans, even to the
height of a miracle, a death like this.
We should understand their feelings better were we as familiar as
they were with the common course of things at a crucifixion. It is
now fifteen hundred years since this mode of punishment ceased to
be practised in Christendom; it was discontinued because of the
sacredness, the spiritual glory which Christ's crucifixion had thrown
around it. With eyes unfamiliar with its details, yet with imagina-
PHYSICAL CAUSE OF THE DEATH OE CHRIST. 761
tions that delighted to picture its cruelties and horrors, the priest-
hood of the middle ages put these materials into the hands of poets
and painters, out of which the popular conceptions of the erection of
the cross, and the sufferings on the cross, and the taking down from
the cross, have for so long a time been drawn. There is much in
these conceptions, that by using the means of information which we
now possess, we can assure ourselves is incorrect. The cross was no
such elevated structure as we see it sometimes represented, needing
ladders to be applied to get at the suspended body. It was seldom
more than a foot or two higher than the man it bore ; neither was the
whole weight of his body borne upon the nails which pierced the
hands. Such a position of painful suspension, causing such a strain
upon all the muscles of the upper extremities, would have added
greatly to the sufferings of the victim, and brought them to a much
speedier close. The cross, in every instance, was furnished with a
small piece of wood projecting from the upright post or beam, astride
which the crucified sat, and which bore the chief weight of his body.
The consequence of this arrangement was, that crucifixion was a
much more lingering kind of death, and in its earlier stages, a much
less excruciating one than we are apt to imagine, or than otherwise
it would have been. As there was but little loss of blood— the nails
that pierced the extremities touching no large blood-vessel, and clo-
sing the wounds they made — the death which followed resulted from
the processes of bodily exhaustion and irritation ; and these were so
slow, that in no case, where the person was in ordinary health and
vigor, did they terminate within twelve hours. Almost invariably he
survived the first twenty-four hours, lived generally over the second,
occasionally even into the fifth or sixth day. The ancient testimo-
nies to this fact are quite explicit, nor are modern ones wanting,
although there are but few parts of the world now where crucifixion
is practised. "I was told," says Captain Clapperton, speaking of
the capital punishments inflicted in Soudan, a district of Africa, "that
wretches on the cross generally linger three days before death puts
an end to their sufferings."
So well was it understood by the early fathers of the church, by
those who lived in or near the times when this mode of capital pun-
ishment was still in use, that life never was terminated by it alone
within six hours, as was the case with Christ, that they all agree in
attributing his death to a supernatural agency. Most of them, as
^ell as many of the most distinguished of our modern commentators,
assign it to the exercise by Christ of the power over his own life
which he possessed ; in accordance, it was thought, with his own dee-
702 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
laraiion: "No man taketh my life from me, but I lay it down of my-
self. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again.
This commandment have I received of my Father." That Christ's
death was entirely voluntary, submitted to of his own free will, and
not under any outward pressure or constraint, is universally conceded.
This entire voluntariness, however, it will at once appear to you, is
sufficiently covered and vindicated, when we believe that whatever
the physical agencies were which combined to effect the death, it was
an act of pure free will in him to submit to their operation. That
without or independent of any such agency, Christ chose to accele-
rate his decease upon the cross by a simple fiat of his own will —
breaking the tie which bound body and soul together, was the solu-
tion of the difficulty very naturally resorted to by those who had the
clearest possible perception of the extraordinary character of this
incident, and who knew of no other adequate cause to which it could
be attributed.
Another solution, indeed, has been proposed, reserved for modern
times, but not coming from our highest authorities, which would
explain the speedy death of Jesus on the cross by ascribing it to an
extreme degree of bodily debility induced by the sleepless nights, the
agony in the garden, the scourging in Pilate's hall, and the mental
conflict at Calvary. All these must undoubtedly have told upon the
frame of the suffering Redeemer, and have impaired its powers of
endurance. But we must remember that they found that frame in the
very flower and fulness of its strength, free, w< may believe, of all con-
stitutional or induced defects. Nor should we, in order to make out
this solution to be sufficient, exaggerate then actual effects. How-
ever acute the bodily sufferings of Gethsemane may have been, we
know that Jesus was supernaturally assisted to sustain them ; they
passed wholly away when the mental agony which produced them
ended. You see no trace of them, in our Lord's presentation of
himself to the band which arrested him, or in his appearances before
Caiaphas and Pilate. The scourging was a not uncommon precursor
of crucifixion, and could not have enfeebled Chribt more than it did
others. He bent so much beneath the weight of the cross that a
temporary relief from the burden was given ; but that he had not
sunk in utter exhaustion was apparent enough, from the very manner
in which he turned immediately thereafter to the daughters of Jeru-
salem, and from the way in which he spoke to them. Further evi-
dence that Jesus did not sink prematurely under physical debility is
afforded us by the fact, witnessed to particularly by many of the
evangelists, and which, as we have already observed, made a strong
PHYSICAL CAUSE OF THE DEATH OF CHRIST. 7G3
impression upon the mind of the centurion. TLe fact alluded to is
this, that it was with a loud voice, indicating a great amount of
existing vigor, that Jesus uttered his last fervent exclamation on the
cross. He did not die of sheer exhaustion, fainting away in feeble-
ness, as one drained wholly of his strength.
Are we, then, to leave the mystery of our Lord's dying thus, at
ihe ninth hour, in the obscurity which covers it; or is there any
other probable explanation of the circumstance? It is now some
years since a devout and scholarly physician,* as the result, he tells
us, of a quarter of a century's reading and reflection, ventured to
suggest — dealing with this subject with all that reverence and deli-
cacy with which it so especially requires to be handled — that the
immediate physical cause of the death of Christ was the rupture of
his heart, induced by the inner agony of his spirit. That strong
emotion may of itself prostrate the body in death, is a familiar fact
in the history of the passions.f Joy, or grief, or anger, suddenly or
intensely excited, has been often known to produce this effect. It
is only, however, in later times that the discovery has been made, by
post mortem examinations, that in such instances, the death resulted
from actual rupture of the heart. That organ, which the universal
language of mankind has spoken of as being peculiarly affected by
the play of the passions, has been found in such cases to have been
rent or torn by the violence of its own action. The blood issuing
from the fissure thus created has filled the pericardium, J and, by its
pressure, stopped the action of the heart. In speaking of those who
have died of a broken heart, we have been using words that were
often exactly and literally true.
If this, then, be sometimes one of the proved results of extreme,
intense emotion, why may it not have been realized in the case of
the Redeemer ? If common earthly sorrow has broken other human
hearts, why may not that sorrow, deep beyond all other sorrow, have
broken his? We know that of itself, apart from all external appli-
ances, the agony of his spirit in Gethsemane so affected his body
that a bloody sweat suffused it — a result identical with what has
been sometimes noticed of extreme surprise or terror having bathed
* Dr. Stroud, in a treatise •' On the Physical Cause of the Death of Christ,"
published in 184=7.
f Ancient story tells us of one of the greatest of Greek tragedians (Soph
ocles) expiring on its being announced to hi in that the palm of victory had been
awarded him, in a public literary contest in which he was engaged ; of a fathei
dying on its being told him that, on the same day, three of his sons had been
crowned as victors in the Olympian games. — See Dr. Stroud's treatise.
X The shut sac or bag by which the heart is .surrounded and enclosed.
?64 THE LIFE OF CHK1ST.
the liuinan body in the same kind of bloody dew. Why, then, should
not the agony of the Saviour's spirit on the cross — which we have
every reason to regard as a renewal of that in the garden — have told
upon his physical frame in a way equally analogous to other results
verified by experience ? Still, however, had we nothing more posi-
tive to go upon, it could only be regarded as a conjecture, a thing
conceivable and quite possible, that Jesus had literally died of a
broken heart. But that striking incident, upon the nature of which,
and the singular testimony regarding it, we remarked in the close of
the previous topic, puts positive evidence into our hands; and the
precise weight of this evidence every recent inquiry into the condition
of the blood within the human body after death has been helping ns
more accurately and fully to appreciate. Let me remind you, then,
that within an hour of two after our Saviour's death, (it could not
have been more,) what the skilful knife of the anatomist does upon
the subject on which it operates, the Roman soldier's spear did upon
the dead body of our Lord — it broadly and deeply pierced the side,
and from the wound inflicted thus there flowed out blood and water;
so much of both, and the water so distinguishable from the blood, as
to attract the particular observation of John, who was standing a
little way off. We cannot be wrong in fixing our attention upon a
fact to which the beloved apostle so especially summons it in his
gospel.
First, then, we have it now authenticated beyond reasonable
doubt, that what John noticed, the copious outflow of water, is pre-
cisely what would have happened on the supposition that the heart
of our Redeemer had been ruptured under the pressure of inward
grief — is precisely what has been noticed in other instances of this
form of death. When it escapes from the blood-vessels, whether
that escape takes place within the body or without, human blood
within a short time coagulates, its watery part separating slowly
from its thicker substance. When rupture of the heart takes place,
and the blood which that organ contains passes into the pericardium,
it ere long undergoes this change ; and, as the capsule into which it
flows is large enough to contain many ounces' weight of liquid, if,
when it is full, the heart be pierced, the contents escaping exhibit
such a stream of mingled blood and water as the eye of John noticed
as he gazed upon the cross. This is what the anatomist has actually
witnessed; numerous instances existing in which the quantity and
quality of the blood escaping from a ruptured heart have been care-
fully noted and recorded. Having satisfied ourselves as to these
facts, from regarding it at first as but an ingenious supposition, we
PHYSICAL CAUSE OF THE DEATH OF CHEIST. 765
feel constrained to regard it as in the highest degree probable that
Christ our Saviour died this very kind of death. But what shuts us
up to this conclusion is, that no other satisfactory explanation can
be given of the outflow of blood and water from the Saviour's side.
When not extravasated — that is, when allowed at death to remain in
the vascular system — the blood of the human body rarely coagu-
lates, and when it does, the coagulation, or separation into blood
and water, does not take place till many hours after death. In rare
instances — of persons dying from long-continued or extreme debil-
ity — the entire blood of the body has been found in a half watery
condition ; but our Saviour's death was not an instance of this kind,
and even though it should be imagined that what long-continued
illness did with others, agony of spirit did with him, inducing the
! same degree of debility, attended with all its ordinary physical
I results ; this, which is the only other supposition that can be held as
accounting to us for what John witnessed, fails in this respect, that,
pierce when or how it might, it could only have been a few trickling
drops of watery blood that the spear of the soldier could have
extracted from the Redeemer's side. Inasmuch, then, as all other
attempted explanations of the recorded incidents of our Redeemer's
death are found to be at fault, and inasmuch as it corresponds with
and explains them all, we rest in the belief that such was the bitter
agony of the Redeemer's soul as he hung upon the cross, that —
unstrengthened now by any angel from heaven, as during the agony
in the garden, when but for that strengthening the same issue
might have been realized — the heart of our Redeemer was broken,
and in this way the tie that bound body and spirit together was
dissolved.
But of what use is it to institute any such inquiry as that in
which we have been engaged ? or what gain would there be in win-
ning for the conclusion arrived at a general assent? It might be
enough to say here that, if reverently treated, there is no single
incident connected with the life or death of our divine Redeemer,
upon which it is possible that any light may be thrown, which does
not solicit at our hands the utmost effort we can make fully and
minutely to understand it. Even, then, though it should appear
that no direct or practical benefit would attend the discovery and
establishment of the true and proximate physical cause of the death
of Christ, still we should regard the inquiry as one in itself too full
of interest to refrain from prosecuting it. But would it not be won-
derful, would it not correspond with other evidences of the truth of
the gospel narrative which the progress of our knowledge has elimi-
766 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
nated, should it turn out to be true, as we believe it has done, that
the accounts of the sufferings and death of Jesus, drawn up by four
independent witnesses — all of them uninformed as to the true state
of the case, and signally ignorant how that which they recorded
might serve to reveal it — did, nevertheless, when brought together
and minutely scrutinized, contain within them those distinct and
decisive tokens which the advanced science of this age recognizes as
indicative of a mode of death, so singular in its character, so rare in
its occurrence, so peculiar in its physical effects ?
Would it not also give a new meaning to some of the expressions
which in Psalms 69 and 22 — the two psalms specially predictive of
his sufferings and death — our Saviour is himself represented as em-
ploying? Read together the twentieth and twenty-first verses of
Psalm 69 : " Reproach hath broken my heart ; and I am full • of
heaviness : and I looked for some to take pity, but there was none ;
and for comforters, but I found none. They gave me also gall for
my meat; and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink." If the
ver}' kind of drink they were to offer him was not deemed unworthy
of being specified in that ancient prophecy — the very smallness, in
fact, of the incident making it serve all the better the purposes of
the prophecy — need we wonder if it were only the literal truth which
the speaker uttered when he said, "Eeproach hath broken my heart"?
When so much has turned out to be literally true, it is but ranking
that expression with the others, when it also has that character
assigned to it. Or take the fourteenth verse of Psalm 22: "I am
poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint : my heart is
like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels." Here, again, we
feel that, if in other parts of that psalm — if in speaking of the shoot-
ing out of the lips, the shaking of the head, the words that were
spoken, the parting of his garments, the casting of lots for his ves-
ture — the great Sufferer is recognized as describing that which did
afterwards actually occur, it is not surprising if, in describing his
own bodily condition, in speaking, as he does, especially of the state
of his heart, he should be speaking of that which also was actually
realized.
But there are positive benefits attendant on the reception of that
view of the Saviour's death which I have now unfolded to you. It
serves, I think, to spiritualize and elevate our conception of the suf-
ferings of Calvary ; it carries our thoughts away from the mere bodily
endurances of the crucifixion; it concentrates them on that mysteri-
ous woe which agitated his spirit, till the very heart that beat within
the body of the agonized Redeemer, under the powerful impulse of
PHYSICAL CAUSE OF THE DEATH OF CHRIST. 767
those emotions which shook and wrung his soul, did burst and break.
If the bloody sweat of the garden, and the broken heart of the cross,
were naturally, directly, exclusively the results of those inward sor-
rows to which it pleased the Saviour to open his soul, that in the
enduring of them he might bear our sins, then how little had man to
do physically with the infliction of that agony wherein the great
atonement lay! If we have read and interpreted aright the details
of our Lord's sufferings in the garden and on the cross, these very
details do of themselves throw into the background the corporeal
part of the endurances, representing it in fact only as the appropri-
ate physical appendix to that overwhelming sorrow, by which the
spirit of the Redeemer was bowed down under the load of human
guilt. This spiritual sorrow formed the body of that agony of which
the corporeal was but the shadow and the sign.
From the very heart of the simple but most affecting records oi
Gethsemane and the cross there issues the voice of a double warn-
ing — a warning against any such estimate of the sufferings of the
man Christ Jesus as would assimilate them to the common sorrows
of suffering humanity. As a man there was nothing in all that he
had to endure from man, which can in any way account for his sweat
being as great drops of blood in the garden. In the rending of his
heart upon the cross, his sufferings remain, even in their outward
manifestations and results, inexplicable on any other supposition
than that which attributes to them a vicarious character, represent-
ing them as borne by the incarnate Son of God, as the head and
representative of his people. But while the very outward history of
Gethsemane and the cross pleads thus strongly against any lowering
of our estimate of the true character and design of Christ's suffer-
ings, does it not as strongly and persuasively lift up its protest
against those pictorial and sentimental representations of the Saviour
in his agony and in his death, which make their appeal to a mere
human sympathy, by dwelling upon and exaggerating the bodily en-
durances which were undergone ? We approach these closing scenes
of our Redeemer's life, we plant our footsteps in the neighborhood
of the garden and the cross; and as we do so, we begin to feel
that it is very sacred ground that we tread. "We try to get nearer
and nearer to the Great Sufferer, to look a little farther into the
bosom of that exceeding sorrow of his troubled, oppressed, bewilder-
ed spirit. It is not long ere we become convinced, that in that sor-
row there are elements we are altogether unable to compute and
appreciate, and that our most becoming attitude, in presence of such
a sufferer as this — the One through whose sufferings for us we look
768 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
for our forgiveness and acceptance with God — is one of childlike
trust, devout adoring gratitude and love. It is too remote, too hid-
den a region this for us rashly to invade, in the hope, that with those
dim lights which alone are in our hands, we shall be able to explore
it. It is too sacred a region for the vulgar tread of a mere human
curiosity, or the busy play of a mere human sympathy.
But what chiefly commends to us the view now given of the Ke-
deemer's death, is its correspondence with all that the Scriptures
teach as to the sacrificial character of that death — all that they tell
us of the virtue of Christ's most precious blood. More clearly and
immediately than any other does this view represent Christ's death
as the proximate and natural result of the offering up of himself to
God, the pouring out of his soul in the great sacrifice for sin. From
the lips of the broken-hearted, these words seem fraught to us with
a new significance, " No man taketh my life from me ; I lay it down
of myself," — all, even to the very death of the body, being embraced
in his entire willingness that there should be laid upon him the trans-
gressions of us all. It was his soul, his life, that Jesus gave a ran-
som for many. The life was regarded as lying in the blood, and so
it was the blood of the sacrificed animal that was sprinkled of old
upon the door-posts, upon the altar, upon the mercy-seat — the ato-
ning virtue regarded as accompanying the application of the blood ;
and so, lifting this idea up from the level of mere ceremonialism, we
are taught that " without shedding of blood," without life given for
life, "there is no remission;" and so, still farther pointing us to the
one true sacrifice, we are told that not by the blood of bulls and
goats, but by his own blood Christ has entered into the holy place,
having obtained eternal redemption for us. It is the blood of Christ
which "cleanseth us from all sin." It is the blood of Christ which
" purges the conscience from dead works, to serve the living God."
It is the blood of the covenant by which we are sanctified. We know,
and desire ever to remember, that this is but a figurative expression ;
that the blood of Christ stands only as the type or emblem of the
life that was given up to God for us. But the blood merely of a
* crucifixion does not fill up the type, does not put its full meaning into
the figure. Crucifixion was not a bloody death, it was only a few
trickling drops that flowed from the pierced hands and feet. But if,
indeed, it was his very heart's blood which Jesus poured out in the
act of giving up his life for us on Calvary, with what fuller and richer
significance will that expression, "the blood of Jesus," fall upon the
ear of faith ! This, then, is he — his bleeding broken heart the wit-
ness to it — who came by water and by blood ; not by water only, but
THE BURIAL. 769
by water and by blood. With minds afresh impressed by the thought
how it was that the blood of Christ was shed; with hearts all full of
gratitude and love, let us take up the words that the Spirit has put
into our lips : " Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins
in his own blood, to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever."
"Thou art worthy, for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God
by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and
nation."
"Rock of ages, cleft for me,
Let me hide myself in thee ;
Let the water and the blood,
From thy riven side that flowed,
Be of sin the double cure,
Cleanse me from its guilt and power. "
XIV.
The Burial.
Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus were both rulers of the
Jews, both members of the Sanhedrim — the Jewish council or court,
composed of seventy members, in whose hands the supreme judicial
power was lodged. It was the right and duty of both these men to
have been present at the trial of our Lord on the morning of the
crucifixion. In common with the other members of the Sanhedrim,
they in all likelihood received the early summons to assemble in the
hall of Caiaphas. It would seem, however, that they did not obey
the call ; that, knowing something beforehand of the object of the
meeting, of the spirit and design of those who summoned it, they
absented themselves. We infer this from the fact that when, afW
Christ's great confession, the high priest put the question, "What
think ye?" to the council, they all condemned him to be guilty of
death. But we are told of Joseph, that he had not "consented to the
counsel and deed" of those by whom the arrest and condemnation of
Jesus were planned and executed. In what way his dissent had been
expressed we are not informed, but having somehow intimated it be-
forehand, it is altogether improbable that, without any demur on his
part, he should have been a consenting party to the final sentence
when pronounced. And neither had Nicodemus gone in with the
xmrse which his fellow -rulers had from the beginning pursued towaida
* John 19 : 38-42 ; Luke 23 : 55 ; Matt. 27 : 61.
Ufa of OhrUt. 49
770 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Jesus. When the officers of the chief priests and Pharisees came
back to their employers, their task unexecuted, giving as their reason
for not having arrested Jesus, that " never man spake like this man,"
so provoked were those Pharisees at seeing such influence exerted
by Jesus upon their own menial servants, that- in the passion of the
moment, they exclaimed, "Are ye also deceived? Have any of the
rulers or of the Pharisees believed on him? But this people, who
knoweth not the law, are cursed."
Perhaps the question about the rulers touched the conscience of
Nieodemus, who was present on the occasion; perhaps he felt that it
was not so true as they imagined, that none of the rulers believed on
Jesus ; perhaps he felt somewhat ashamed of himself and of the false
position which he occupied. At any rate, the haughty and contempt-
uous tone of his brethren stirred him up for once to say a word.
"Doth our law," said he to them, "judge any man before it hear
him, and know what he doeth?" A veiy gentle and reasonable
remonstrance, but one which had no other effect than turning against
hirnself the wrath that had been expending itself upon their officials.
"Art thou also," they say to him, "of Galilee?" Nicodemus cowered
under that question, and the suspicion that it implied. Neither then
nor afterwards did he say or do anything more which might expose him
to the imputation of being a follower of Jesus ; but we cannot think
so ill of him as to believe that, beyond concealing whatever belief in
Christ he cherished, he would have played the hypocrite so far as to
let his voice openly be heard as one of those condemning our Lord
to death.
Let us judge both these men as fairly and gently as we ourselves
would desire to be judged. To what amount of enlightenment and
belief as to the character and claims of Christ they had arrived pre-
vious to his decease, it were difficult to imagine. Both must have
had a large amount of deep, inveterate Jewish prejudice to contend
with in accepting the Messiahship of the Nazarene; not such preju
dice alone as was common to the great mass of then* couutrymen, bu
such as had a peculiar hold on the more educated men of their time,
when raised to be guides and rulers of the people. Over all this
prejudice Joseph had already triumphed; there was a sincerity and
integrity of judgment in him, an earnest spirit of faith and hope ; he
was a good man and a just ; one who, like the aged Simeon, had beer
waiting for the kingdom of God, the better prepared to hail it in
whatever guise it came. He had thus become really, though no
openly or professedly, a disciple of Jesu?. We do not know whether
Nicodemus had got so far. We. do know, however, that the rery first
!
s
1
■
THE BURIAL. 771
words and acts of Jesus at Jerusalem made the deepest and most
favorable impression on his mind. It was at the very opening of
our Lord's ministry, that this man came to Jesus by night. Instead
of thinking of the covert way in which he came, only to find ground
of censure in it, let us remember that he was the one and only ruler
who did in any way come to Jesus; and that he came — as his very
first words of salutation and inquiry showed — in the spirit of deep
respect, and earnest desire for instruction. Let us remember, too,
that without one word of blame escaping from our Lord's own lips,
it was to this man that, at so early a period of his ministry, our Sav-
iour made the clear and full disclosure of the great object of his own
mission and death, preserved in the third chapter of the gospel by
John ; that it was to Nicodemus he spake of that new spiritual birth
by which the kingdom was to be entered; that it was to Nicodemus
he said, that as Moses had lifted up the serpent in the wilderness,
even so must He be lifted up: that it was to Nicodemus that the
great saying was addressed, " God so loved the world that he gave
his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not
perish, but have everlasting life." Surely he who, up till near the
close, was so chary of speaking about his death even to his own dis-
ciples, would not, at the very beginning of his ministry, have spoken
thus to this ruler of the Jews, had he not perceived in him one wil-
ling and waiting to be taught. Christ must have seen some good soil
in that man's heart, to have scattered there so much of the good seed.
That seed was long of germinating, but it bore fruit at last, very
pleasant for the eye to look upon.
It was the fault both of Joseph and Nicodemus, that they hid, as
it were, their faces from Christ ; that they were ashamed and afraid
to confess him openly. But who shall tell us exactly what their state
of mind, their faith and feeling toward him were ; how much of hesi-
tation both of them may — indeed, we may boldly say must — have felt
as to many things about Jesus which they could in no way harmo-
nize with their conceptions of the Great Prophet that was to arise ?
" Search and look," his brother councillors had said to Nicodemus,
at that time when he had ventured to interpose the question which
provoked them — " search and look ; for out of Galilee ariseth no
prophet." Nicodemus had nothing to say to that bold assertion;
nothing to say, we may well believe, to many an objection taken to
the pretensions of the Son of the Galilean carpenter. In common
with Joseph, he may have believed; but both together may have
been quietly waiting till some further and more distinct manifesta-
tions of his Messiahship were made by Christ. But why did thej
772 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
not, so far as they did believe in him, openly acknowledge it ? Why
did they not feel rebuked by that poor man, blind from his birth,
dragged for examination before them, who witnessed in their presence
so good a confession ? It was because they knew so well that their
brother rulers had agreed that, "if any man did confess that he was
Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue." It was because they
knew so well and felt so keenly what to them that excommunication
would involve : for it was no slight punishment among the Jews to be
expelled from the synagogue ; it involved in its extreme issue conse-
quences far more disastrous than a mere ban of admission into their
religious assemblies ; it involved loss of station, separation from kin-
dred and the society of their fellow-men. To the poor blind beggar
upon whom it actually was passed, that doom may have fallen but
lightly; for he had never known much of that of which this doom
was to deprive him. A very different thing this expulsion from the
synagogue would have been to Joseph and to Nicodemus. Let us
not judge these men too harshly for the reluctance they showed to
brave it ; let us rather try to put ourselves exactly in their position,
that we may sympathize with the hesitation which they felt in ma-
king any open acknowledgment of their attachment to Christ.
His death, however, at once put an end to that hesitation in both
their breasts. They may not have been present at the crucifixion.
They would not well have known where to take their station, or how
to comport themselves there. They could not have joined in the
mockery, nor were they prepared to exhibit themselves as friends of
the Crucified. But though not spectators of the tragedy, they were
somewhere in the immediate neighborhood, waiting anxiously to
learn the issue. Could they, members of the same Sanhedrim, thrown
often into contact, witnesses of each other's bearing and conduct, as
to all the steps which had been taken against Jesus, have remained
ignorant of each other's secret leanings toward the persecuted Naza-
rene ? Was it by chance that they met together at the cross, to act
in concert there ? We would rather believe that, attracted by the tie
of a common sympathy with Jesus, the sad news of his being taken
out to Golgotha to be crucified brought them that forenoon together ;
that they were by each other's side as the tidings reached them of
all the wonders which had transpired around the cross, and of the
strange death which Jesus died. The resolution of both is promptly
taken ; and it looks, certainly, as if taken with the knowledge of each
other's purpose. Joseph goes at once boldly to Pilate, and cravea
the body of Jesus. An ancient prophecy, of which he knew noth-
ing—one that seemed, as Jesus died, most unlikely of accomplish-
THE BURIAL. 773
merit— Lad proclaimed that he was to make his grave with the rich.
This rich man has a new sepulchre, wherein never man lay, which he
had bought or got hewn out of the rock, with the idea, perhaps, that
he might himself be the first to occupy it. It lies there close at hand,
not many paces from the cross. He is resolved to open it, that it
may receive, as its first tenant, the body of the Crucified. Nay, fur-
ther ; as there are few, if any, now of Christ's known friends to un-
dertake the task, he is resolved — his dignity, the sense of shame, the
fear of the Jews, all forgotten — to put his own hands to the office of
giving that body the most honorable sepulture that the time and
circumstances can afford.
Once assured, on the centurion's testimony, that it was even as
Joseph said, Pilate at once gives the order that the body shall be
committed into his hands. The centurion, bearing that order, returns
to Golgotha. Joseph provides himself by the way with the clean
white cloth in which to shroud the body. The soldiers, at their offi-
cer's command, bear the bodies of the other two away, leaving that
of Jesus still suspended on the cross. It is there when Joseph reaches
the spot, to be dealt with as he likes. How quiet and how lonely the
place, as the first preparations are made for the interment ! few to
help, and none to interrupt. The crowd has all dispersed ; some half-
dozen Galilean women alone remain. But is John not here? He
had returned to Calvary, had seen but a little while before the thrust
of the soldier's spear ; he knew that but a short time was left for dis-
posing of the body. Is it at all likely that in such circumstances he
should leave, and not wait to see the close ? Let us believe that
though, with his accustomed modesty, he has veiled his presence, he
was present standing with those Galilean women. They see, coming
in haste, this Joseph of Arimathea, whom none of them had ever
known as a disciple of their Master; they see the white linen cloth
that he has provided ; they notice that the body is committed to his
charge ; they watch with wonder as he puts forth his own hand to the
taking down of the body. Their wonder grows as Nicodemus — also
a stranger to them, whom they had never seen coming to Jesus —
joins himself to Joseph ; not rudely and roughly, as the soldiers had
dealt with the others, but gently and reverently handling the dead.
As they lay the body on the ground, it appears that this new-comer,
Nicodemus, has brought with him a mixture of powdered myrrh and
aloes, about one hundred pounds' weight. The richest man in Jeru-
salem could not have furnished more or better spicery for the burial
of his dearest friend. It is evident that these two men have it in
their heart, and are ready to put to their hands, to treat the dead
774 THE LIFE OE CHKIST.
with all due respect. Their fears disarmed, assured of the friendly
purpose of those interposing thus, the Galilean women gather in
around the pale and lifeless form. The white shroud is ready, the
myrrh and the aloes are at hand, but who shall spread those spices
on the funeral garment, and wrap it round the corpse to fit it for the
burial ? This is a service, one of the last and the saddest which our
poor humanity needs, which, as if by an instinct of nature, woman's
gentle hand has in all ages and in all countries been wont to render
to the dead ; and though the gospel narrative be silent here, we will
not believe that it was otherwise at the cross ; we will not believe but
that it was the tender hands of those loving women who had watched
at Calvary from morning-tide till now, which offer their aid, and are
permitted and honored to wipe from that mutilated form the bloody
marks of dishonor which it wore, to swathe it with the pure linen
robe, and wrap around the thorn-marked brow the napkin, so falsely
deemed to be the last clothing of the dead.
One thing alone is wanting, that the manner of the Jews in bury
ing may be observed — a bier to lay the body on, to bear it to the
sepulchre. There has been no time to get one, or it is felt that the
distance is so short that it is not needed. That body has, however,
the best bier of all — the hands of true affection, to lift it up and
carry it across to the new tomb which waits to receive it. The feet
let us assign to Joseph, the body to Nicodemus, and that regal head
with those closed eyes, over which the shadows of the resurrection
are already flitting, let us lay it on the breast of the beloved disciple.
The brief path from the cross to the sepulchre is soon traversed. In
silence and in deep sorrow they bear their sacred burden, and lay it
gently down upon its clean, cold rocky bed. The last look of the
dead is taken. The buriers reverently withdraw, the stone is rolled
to the mouth of the sepulchre : separated from the living — Jesus
rests with the dead—
"At length the worst is o'er, and thou art laid
Deep in thy darksome bed ;
All still and cold behind yon dreary stone
Thy sacred form is gone.
Around those lips where peace and mercy hung
The dew of death hath clung ;
The dull earth o'er thee, and thy friends around,
Thou sleep'st a silent corse, in funeral-raiment wound."
The burial is over now, and we might depart ; but let us linger a
little longer, and bestow a parting look on the persons and the place,
the buriers and the burying-ground. The former have been few in
aumber ; what they have to do, they must do quickly ; for the sun is
THE BURIAL. 775
down in the western sky when Joseph gets the order from Pilate ;
and before it sets, before the great Sabbath begins, they must lay
Jesus in the grave. Yet hurried as they have been, with all such
honor as they can show, with every token of respect, have they laid
that body in the tomb ; they have done all they could. The last service
which Jesus ever needed at the hands of men it has been their privi-
lege to render. And for the manner in which they have rendered it,
shall we not honor them? Yes, verily, wherever this gospel of the
kingdom shall be made known, what they thus did for the Lord's
burial shall be told for a memorial of them ; and henceforth we shall
forget of Joseph that hitherto he had concealed his discipleship, and
acted as if he were a stranger to the Lord, seeing that, when Christ
was in such a special sense a stranger on the earth, he opened his
own new sepulchre to take him in ; and we shall forget it of Nicode-
mus that it was by night he had come to Jesus, seeing that, upon
this last sad day he came forth so openly, with his costly offering of
myrrh and aloes, to embalm Christ for his burial. Of the Galilean
women we have nothing to forget; but let this be the token where-
with we shall remember them, that, the last at the cross and the first
at the sepulchre, they were the latest at the grave : for Joseph has
departed ; Nicodemus and the rest are gone ; but there, while the
sun goes down, and the evening shadows deepen around, the very
solitude and gloom of the place such as might have warned them
away — there are Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to be seen sit-
ting over against the sepulchre, unable to tear themselves from the
spot, gazing through their tears at the place where the body of their
Lord is laid.
Let us now bestow a parting look upon the burying-ground. " In
the place where he was crucified there was a garden, and in that
garden a sepulchre." Plant yourselves before that sepulchre, and
look around. This is no place for graves ; here rise around you no
memorials of the dead. You see but a single sepulchre, and that
sepulchre in a garden. Strange mingling this of opposites, the
garden of life and growth and beauty, circling the sepulchre of
death, corruption, and decay. Miniature of the strange world we
live in. What garden of it has not its own grave ? Y r our path may,
for a time, be through flowers and fragrance; follow it far enough, it
leads ever to a grave. But this sepulchre in this garden suggests
other and happier thoughts. It was in a garden once of old — in
Eden, that death had his first summons given, to find there his first
prey, it is in a garden here at Calvary, that the last enemy of
mankind has the death-blow given to him — that the great conqueror
r
776 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
is in his turn overcome. Upon that stone which they rolled to the
mouth of the sepulchre, let us engrave the words, " O death, where
is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? Thanks be to God,
which giveth us the victory, through our Lord Jesus Christ." What a
change it has made in the character and aspect of the grave, that our
Saviour himself once lay in it ! He has stripped it of its terrors, and to
many a weary one given it an attractive rather than a repulsive look
"I heard a voice from heaven saying" — it needed a voice from heav-
en to assure us of the truth — "Blessed are the dead who die in the
Lord." To such the grave is, indeed, a bed of blessed rest. Buried
with Jesus, they repose till the hour of the great awakening cometh,
when with him they shall arise to that newness of life over which no
shadow of death shall ever pass.
OUTLINE STUDIES. 776a
OUTLINE STUDIES.
The concluding division, or Part VI, of the surveying of our Lord's
earthly life is now entered upon. The material naturally divides
itself into three Studies: the first covering the event of the resurrec-
tion and the early appearances in Judea; the second comprising the
appearances in Galilee; and the third treating the closing appearances
in Judea and the ascension.
Without question the New Testament regards the resurrection of
Christ as of supreme value for the establishment of Christianity. The
great care observed in the Gospels to authenticate the event, as well
as the place which it holds in the early discourses and letters of the
apostles, is in evidence.
It is clear from the Gospel accounts that the apostles and women
friends of Jesus were so stunned by his death with its terrible attendant
circumstances that his predictions of his resurrection were for the time
being utterly forgotten, and no expectation of the event remained in
their minds. This makes the proof of this great fact all the stronger.
In the present Study this wonderful line of appearances of the risen
Christ passes through the first Judean cycle, covering two Sundays and
six out of the ten clearly recorded appearances of Christ according as
they are usually reckoned.
There is a most striking distinction to be noted between Christ's
outward personal association with those who were intimate with him
before the resurrection compared with his meetings with them after
that event. Dr. Hanna seeks to show that the period of forty days
through which the Saviour's disclosures of himself extended, taken
in connection with the brief and physically most reserved manifesta-
tion of himself, was designed and fitted precisely to enable the fol-
lowers of our Lord to hold together in their faith the two factors of his
humanity and his divinity. Had he entered during the forty days
into the same familiar relations with them as those existing before his
passion, they would have been impressed with the human element to
the sacrifice or prejudice of the divine. On the other hand, had he
crowded the proofs of his resurrection state into a day or two and then
ascended, they would have been led to emphasize the divine side of
his nature to the exclusion or practical loss of the human. But by the
course which he observed he enabled them to hold in their feeling and
their faith the perfect union of his true humanity and his glorious
divinity.
7766 THE LIFE OF CHRIST. ,
PART VI. FORTY DAYS AND THE ASCENSION.
Study 23. Resurrection and First Appearances in Judea.
(1) The situation before the event 777-780
a. The wonderful Sabbath stillness 777
b. No expectation of the resurrection 778
c. Love lives on even when faith dies 778
d. The chief priests and rulers have fear of Christ even though dead . . . .778
e . They arrange for sealing the tomb and setting a guard 779, 780
(2) The event' of the resurrection 781-783
a. No one saw the resurrection itself 781
b. The angel's announcement to the women 781
c. The event stopped the mouths of Christ's adversaries 782
d. Confirmed Christ's words 782, 783
e. Put the seal of divine acceptance on Christ's whole work 783
(3) Importance to Christianity 783-785
a. The great foundation fact 783, 784
b. The conquest of death 784, 785
(4) Appearance to Mary Magdalene 786-794
a. Minor discrepancies in Gospel accounts 786, 787
b. John's account , 787
c. Mary Magdalene not the sinful woman 787
d. Her devotion 788, 789
e. Christ reveals himself to her < 790-794
(5) Appearance to the other women 797
a. Revealed by his salutation 797
b. Held by the feet and worshipped 797
c. Report given to the apostles 797
(6) Appearance to the two on the way to Emmaus 794-802
a. Toward evening of the first Sunday 794
b. Two unknown disciples 794-795
c. Yet having a great heart need 796-802
(7) Appearance to Peter 803
a. On the first Sunday afternoon 803
6. Reported that evening 803
(8) Appearance to the ten in the upper room 802-811
a. The two return from Emmaus 802, 803
b. The apostles and others in the upper room 803
c. Jesus appears among them 803, 804
d. Instructions and developments 805-811
(9) Appearance to the eleven, and Thomas convinced 811-819
a. On the second Sunday evening 811
b. Possible reason for Thomas' absence the week before. 811, 812
c. Nature of his unbelief 812-816
d. Mixed state of faith and feeling of Thomas when the evening
came 816, 817
e. Christ's appearance and words to Thomas 817
/. The purified and exalted faith of Thomas 817
g. His adoring and fervent words 817
h. Concluding thoughts and reflections 817-819
THE FORTY DAYS
AFTER
OUR LORD'S RESURRECTION,
The Resurrection.*
We left Mary Magdalene and the other Mary keeping their lonely
watch over against the sepulchre till the sun of Friday sets. At its
setting, Saturday, the great Sabbath of the passover, begins. Such
a Sabbath never dawned upon this world before or since. All things
wear an outward look of quiet in Jerusalem. A great calm, a deeper
than Sabbath stillness, has followed the stir and excitement of those
strange scenes at Golgotha. Crowds of silent worshippers fill as
usual the courts of the temple ; and all goes on, at the hours of the
morning and evening sacrifice, as it had done for hundreds of years
gone by. But can those priests, who minister within the Holy Place,
gaze without some strange misgivings upon the rent in the veil from
top to bottom, which yesterday they had seen so strangely made,
and which they scarce had time imperfectly to repair ? Can they think
without dismay of that rude uncovering of all the hidden mysteries
of the most Holy Place, which they had witnessed ? Among the
crowds of worshippers without, there are friends and followers of
Jesus. They would have been here had nothing happened to their
Master the day before, and they are here now, for by keeping away
they might draw suspicion upon themselves ; but what heart have
they for the services of the sanctuary? They have just had all their
brightest earthly hopes smitten to the dust ; and so prostrate are
they beneath the stroke, that they cannot even recall to memory that
but a few months before, Jesus had, more than once, distinctly told
them that he must go up to Jerusalem, and suffer many things ol
the elders and chief priests, and be killed, and be raised again the
Matt. 26:62-66; 28:1-6.
778 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
third day. No writer of a fictitious story, no framer of religious
myths, had he previously put into Christ's lips such distinct foretell-
in gs of his death and resurrection, would have attributed to his follow-
ers such an entire forgetfulness of these predictions, such an utter
prostration of all faith and hope, as that which the evangelists de-
scribe as corning upon all our Lord's disciples immediately after his
death, lasting till the most extraordinary means were taken to re-
move them, and yielding slowly then. Yet, after all, is it not true to
human nature, that upon the minds and hearts of those simple, rude,
uncultivated men and women, filled as they had been with other and
quite different expectations, the shock of such a shameful death,
coming in such a way upon their Master, was so sudden and so stun-
ning, that all power of forming a new conception of their Master's
character, and taking up a new faith in him, was gone ; the power
even of remembering what he had said about himself beforehand for
the season paralyzed?
But love lives on, even where faith dies out, among those discon-
solate and utterly hopeless friends and followers of our Lord. While
the two Marys had remained throughout the preceding day before
the sepulchre, others of those Galilean women had hastened to occupy
the short space between the burial and the sunset, in beginning their
preparations for the embalming of their Master's body. And these,
with the two Marys, are waiting now, not without impatience; for
their hearts, not in the temple services, have gone where they have
seen him laid — till the sunset, the close of the Sabbath, enables them
to have all the needed wrappings, and spices, and ointments prepar-
ed, so that when the third morning dawns they may go out to Golgo-
tha, to finish there at leisure what Joseph and Nicodemus had more
hurriedly and imperfectly attempted, before they laid Jesus in the
sepulchre.
But how, throughout this intervening Sabbath, fares it with the
chief priests and rulers ? Are they quite at ease ; content and happy ;
satisfied with, if not glorying in, their success? They have got rid
of this obnoxious man ; he is dead and buried. What fear can there
be of him now ? What risk or danger to them, or to their supremacy,
can come out of his grave ? May they not bury all their apprehen-
sions in that closed sepulchre? No ; a ghastly fear comes in to mar
the joy of a gratified revenge. They dread that dead man still ; he
rules their spirits from his sepulchre. They would not cross Herod's
threshold the day before, lest they should be defiled. They could not
boar the thought that Jesus should hang suspended on the cross
throughout the Sabbath-day; it would disturb, it would desecrate
THE RESURRECTION. 779
the services of the hoi j day, the Holy Place. But they scruple not to
desecrate the Sabbath by their jealous fears ; by their secret councils ;
by their plannings to prevent a future, dreaded danger. And so, no
sooner is the Sabbath over, than they hasten to the governor, saying
to him : " Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet
alive, After three days I will rise again." They had themselves heard
him, at the very beginning of his ministry, say publicly : " Destroy
this temple, and in three days I will raise it again." They had heard
him at a later period say: "An evil and adulterous generation
seeketh after a sign ; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the
sign of the prophet Jonas: for as Jonas was three days and three
nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and
three nights in the heart of the earth." Was it to these vague and
general sayings of our Lord that the rulers now referred? It is
more likely that they had in view some of those more recent and
move explicit declarations of Jesus to his own disciples, such as the
one already quoted, or such as that other and still more explicit one,
when he took his disciples apart by the way, as they were going up
to Jerusalem, and said to them, " Behold, we go up to Jerusalem ;
and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests, and un-
to the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death, and shall de-
liver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him :
and the third day he shall rise again." What more natural than
that the betrayer himself, to whose act such special allusion was thus
made, should, in some of his communications with the rulers, have
repeated to them those memorable words? They now remember,
while the disciples themselves forget. They fear, while the disciples
have ceased to hope. When first reported to them, they had mock-
ed at the unmeaning words ; but now that so much of the prophecy
has been accomplished, they begin to dread lest somehow or other
the remainder of it should also be fulfilled. As yet all was safe ; it
was not till the third day that he was to rise again. During that
Sabbath-day the body of the Crucified was secure enough in the sep-
ulchre; the very sanctity of the day a sufficient guard against any
attempt to invade the tomb. But instant means must be taken that
thereafter there be no tampering with the place of burial. No night-
guard could they get so good as a company of Koman soldiers whose
iron rule of discipline imposed death upon the sentinel who slept at
his post. Such guard they could get stationed at the sepulchre on-
ly under the governor's sanction. " Command, therefore," they said
tc Pilate, " that the sepulchre be made sure until the third day, lest
his disciples come by night, and steal him away, and say unto the
780 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
people, He is risen from the dead : so the last error shall be worse
than the first." Little heeding either the first or the last error, hav-
ing no sympathy with their idle fears abont the rifling of the sepul-
chre, in no good humor either with himself or with the rulers, yet,
since he had gone so far to please them, not caring to refuse their
last request, Pilate complies. "Ye have a watch," he says; 'a de-
tachment of my soldiers placed at your disposal during the feast,
use it as you please ; go your way, and, with its help, make the sep-
ulchre of that poor innocent Nazarene you got me to crucify, as sure
as ye can.' And they went their way. They passed a cord across
the stone which filled the entrance into the sepulchre, and fastened
it at each end to the adjoining rock with the sealing clay, so that
the stone could not be removed and replaced, however carefully, in
its first position, without leaving behind a mark of the disturbance.
And they placed the sentinels, with the strict command that they
were to suffer no man in the darkness to meddle with that sepulchre ;
and thus, securely guarded, the dead body of the Redeemer reposes
The darkness deepens round the sepulchre, the sentinels kindle
their night-lamps, and pace to and fro before it. The midnight hour
has passed ; it is yet dark. The day has but begun to dawn, when
those women, whose wakeful love sends them forth on their early
errand, leave the holy city to go out to Calvary to complete there
the interrupted embalming. They are already near the spot, when a
difficulty, not thought of till then, occurs to them. And they said
among themselves, Who shall roll away the stone from the door of
the sepulchre? That stone which they had seen two nights before
closely fitted into its place, was too large, too firmly embedded in its
place, for their weak hands to move, and at this hour, and at that
spot, what aid of stronger hands can they obtain ? Another difficul-
ty there was ; but of it happily they were ignorant, or it might have
stopped their movement altogether. Of that sealing of the stone, of
that guard planted the preceding day before the sepulchre, they had
heard nothing, else they might have put to one another the further
question, How, with such guard before it, shall we ever get access to
the grave ? It is as they are communing with one another by the
way, that the earth quakes, and the angel descends from heaven, and
rolls the stone back from the door of the sepulchre, and, having
done this service for the embalmers, sits down upon it, waiting their
approach. Was it then that the great event of that morning took
place? Was it as the angel's hand rolled back the stone, and open-
ed the entrance of the tomb, that the Great Redeemer of mankind
awoke, arose, and stepped forth from his temporary rest among the
"He is not Here, for He is Risen.
THE RESURRECTION. 781
dead ? It is not said so. The keepers did not witness the resurreo-
tion. They saw the angel, the light of his countenance, the snowy
radiance of his raiment, and for fear of him they became as dead
men. But they saw not the Lord himself come forth. The angel
himself may not have witnessed the resurrection. He did not say
he had. He speaks of it as an ev*ent already past. It may not
have been as a spectator or minister to his Lord, in the act of rising
from the dead, that he was sent down from heaven. The Lord oi
life needed not that service which he came to render. Through that
stone door he could have passed as easily as he passed afterwards
through other doors which barred not his entrances nor his exits.
Altogether secret, the exact time and manner of the event unnoticed
and unknown was that great rising from the dead. The clearest and
amplest proof was afterwards given of the fact that, some time be-
tween sunset of the last and sunrise of the first day of the week, the
resurrection had taken place ; but it pleased not the Lord who then
arose to do so under the immediate eye or inspection of any human
witness.
Alarmed by the quaking of the ground beneath their feet, be-
wildered by the strange light which is seen streaming forth from be-
side the sepulchre, the women enter the garden, approach the sepuk
chre, gather courage as they see that the stone is already rolled
away, but might have sunk again in terror as they looked at him
who sat upon that stone, had he not prevented their fears by saying
to them, in tones, let us believe, full of soothing power : " Fear not
ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified" — 'I know
the errand that you come on. I know that it is love to the Crucified
which brings you, thus early, to what was once his grave ; and 1
have tidings of him that such love as yours will delight to hear.
True, all that labor of yours about these spices and ointments is lost ;
you will find here nobody to embalm. But not lost is this visit to the
sepulchre; for to you first, among all his followers, have I to tell:
"He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place
where the Lord lay;"' and he led them into the sepulchre.
"Come, see the place where the Lord lay." How little did the
angel who first uttered these words, and heard the echo of them die
away among the recesses of the rocky garden — how little, perhaps,
did he think that the invitation which he thus gave • to those few
trembling women who stood before him, would be conveyed down
through all after times, and be borne to the ears of millions upon
millions of the followers of Jesus Christ. And yet it has been
even so, and in the course of its long descent and wide circula-
782 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
tion, it has reached even unto us. Let us listen to and obey it
Come, let us look at the place where the Lord once lay, and from
which on that third morning he arose.
We cannot indeed literally accept the angelic invitation, and go
and look into the empty sepulchre. The hand of time, and in this
instance the still rougher hands of the devotee and of the infidel,
have wrought such changes in that sacred neighborhood, that the
exact site of the holy sepulchre cannot be identified. But though we
may not be able to plant our footsteps on the very ground that the
trembling women occupied, or follow them as, angel led, they passed
into the deserted tomb, yet in thought we may still bend over the
place where the Lord once lay.
As we do so, let us reflect upon the proofs of the divine mission
of the Redeemer afforded by his resurrection from the grave. Evi-
dence enough had been afforded by our Lord himself, during his life-
time, of his divine character and authority. The words he spake, the
works he did, proclaimed him to be the Son of the Highest. But
sufficient as it was to convince the candid, that evidence had not been
sufficient to silence the cavillers. His words were misunderstood and
misinterpreted; his miracles, though not denied, were attributed to
Satanic agency. It was as a blasphemer that he was put to death.
But his resurrection appears at least to have had this effect, it stopped
the mouths of his adversaries. There might be a few among the more
credulous of them who accepted the clumsy tale that the chief priests
tried to circulate about his disciples coming by night and taking the
body away. But loudly and publicly as, both in the heart of Jeru-
salem and elsewhere, the apostles proclaimed this fact in the pres-
ence of the rulers themselves, it does not appear that its reality was
ever openly challenged, or that any such attempt was made to explain
it away as had been made regarding other miracles wrought by the
Saviour's hands. If it failed to convince, it succeeded at least in
silencing those who would, if they could, have dealt with it in a like
manner.
It had indeed the force of a double miracle. Alone, and by itself,
the rising of Jesus from the dead most fully authenticated the claims
he had put forth. Had the Son of Mary not been all that he had
declared himself to be, never would such an exercise of the Divine
power have been put forth on his behalf. But more than this, Christ
had publicly perilled his reputation as the Christ of God, on the
occurrence of this event. "When challenged to give some sign in
support of his pretensions, it was to his future resurrection from the
dead, and to it alone, that he appealed. Often, as we have seen, and
THE RESURRECTION. 783
that in terms incapable of misconstruction, had our Lord foretold his
resurrection. It carried thus along with it a triple proof of the divin-
ity of our Lord's mission. It was the fulfilment of a prophecy, as
well as the working of a miracle; that miracle wrought, and that
prophecy fulfilled, in answer to a solemn and confident appeal made
beforehand by Christ to this event as the crowning testimony to his
Messiahship.
But not yet have we exhausted the testimony which the resurrec-
tion of Jesus embodies. He spoke of that resurrection as the rais-
ing of himself by himself. " Destroy this temple, and in three days
I will raise it up. I lay down my life, that I may take it again. I
have power to lay it down; I have power to take it again." An
assumption by Jesus Christ of a power proper to the Creator alone ;
a clothing of himself with the high prerogative of the giver and tho
restorer of life. His actual resurrection, did it not in the most solemn
manner ratify that assumption, convincing us by an instance of the
highest kind, that whatsoever thing the Father doeth, the same doeth
the Son likewise?
But further still — and it is this which attaches such importance
to this incident in the history of our Kedeemer, and causes it to be
spoken of in the New Testament Scriptures as standing in such close
connection with all our dearest hopes as to the life beyond the grave —
in the resurrection of the Saviour, the seal of the Divine acceptance
and approval was put upon that great work of service and of sacri-
fice, of atonement and of obedience in our room and stead, which
Jesus finished on the cross. The expression and embodiment of that
acceptance and approval in a visible act, an outward and palpable
incident, give an aid and a security to our faith in Christ for our
acceptance with God, far beyond that which any bare announcement
in words could possibly have conveyed. Can we wonder, then, at the
prominence given, in the teachings and writings of the apostles of
our Lord, to an event so full of convincing evidence, so rich in spirit-
ual instruction and comfort? To be a witness to this great event
was held — as the election of Matthias informs us — to be the special
function of the apostolic office. It was to this event that Peter
referred at large in his discourse to the multitude on the day of Pen-
tecost. "This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are wit-
nesses." Questioned, a short time afterwards, before the Sanhedrim,
as to the earliest of the apostolic miracles, "Be it known," said
Peter, " unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the uame
of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised
from the dead, even by him doth this man stand before you whole."
784 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
When Paul addressed the men of Athens, this was the one supernat-
ural incident to which in the way of attestation, he referred: "God
hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world by that
man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance, in
that he hath raised him from the dead." I have but to refer to the
fifteenth chapter of the first epistle to the Corinthians, to remind you
of the place and prominence given to the event by the great apostle
of the Gentiles : " If Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain,
and your faith is a] so vain."
From the first, it was to that crowning miracle of Christianity
that its teachers made appeal. And now once more, in our own
times, it is by that event that we desire that the entire question of
the supernaturalism of our religion should be decided; for if that
event be true, then any, then all other miracles are at least credible,
for where among them shall a greater than this be found ? If that
event be true, then upon it does the entire fabric of our Christian
faith securely rest ; for if we believe that Jesus died and rose again,
then are we prepared along with this, and as harmonizing with this,
to believe all that the Scriptures have taught us of the glory oj
Christ's person, as one with, and equal to the Father; all that they
have taught us of the design of his life and death among us, as the
Iledeemer of our souls from death — the giver, the infuser, the nour-
ish er, the maturer of that eternal life which is for our souls in him.
Let us then be devoutly grateful for it > that our faith in him — in
knowledge of whom, in union with whom standeth our eternal life-
has such a solid foundation of fact to rest upon — a foundation so
firmly embedded among all those other foundations upon which our
knowledge of the past reposes, that to unsettle, to overturn it, yon
must unsettle, must overturn them all.
" Come, see the place where the Lord lay," that you may contem-
plate him, the one and only instance which this world hath witness-
ed of the last enemy, Death, being fairly met — met in his own terri-
tory, triumphed over in his own domain, by the use of his own weap-
ons. That grim, inexorable tyrant, wealth has never bribed, tears
have never softened, beauty has never moved as he made his unfal-
tering approach, and struck his unerring blow. To and fro, wide
over the vast field of humanity, has that sheer, cold scythe been ever
swapng, and generation after generation has it laid low in the dust.
Two only out of the many millions of our race — two in olden time
were snatched away before the stroke of the destroyer came upon
them, and passed away without tasting death. But the translation
of Enoch and Elijah was no victory over death; they never met, they
THE RESURRECTION. 785
never grappled with this foe ; they were withdrawn from the battle-
field before the day of conflict came. Some there were, too, in after
times, who, subject for a season to the dominion of death, were de-
livered from its sway; but neither was theirs the victory, for they
bad to return again, and bow once more beneath the yoke of the
great conqueror. The widow's son, the ruler's daughter, and Laza-
rus whom Jesus loved, lie low as others in the caverns of the dead.
One alone of human form ever grappled with that strong wrestle*
Death, and cast him from him overcome. His way to conquest lay
through brief submission. Like others, he descended into the dark
and dreary prison-house. The grave opened to receive him. He
seemed to have passed away as the multitudes who had gone before.
But death and the grave never received such a visitant into their
silent and vast domains. He approached the throne of the tyrant, to
wrench the sceptre of empire from his hand. In bursting, as he did,
the barriers of the grave, it was no mere respite that he obtained for
himself, but a full and final victory. He bade adieu that morning to
the sepulchre for ever. He left no trophy behind ; nothing of his in
the hands of death; nothing but that empty sepulchre to tell that he
had once, and for a short season, been under the hold of the destroy-
er. Even had this been a solitary conquest, though the sepulchre of
Jesus were to remain for ever as the only one from which the tenant
came forth alive, to return to it no more — still would we draw near to
muse upon this one triumph of humanity over the last enemy.
But we have all a nearer, a more special interest in this deserted
tomb of Jesus Christ. His was no solitary, isolated victory over the
grave. For us he died, and for us he rose again. Firm and fast as
the grave now seems to hold the buried generations of our race, it is
now doomed, as a fruit of Christ's resurrection, to relax its grasp, and
yield them up again. Empty as was Joseph's sepulchre when tho
angel stood before it and invited the women to enter, so empty shall
one day be every grave of earth, when another angel shall sound his
trumpet, and it shall ring through all the regions of the dead, and stir
all to life again. Blessed was that morning which dawned vipon the
empty tomb at Calvary, but more blessed to us shall that other morn-
ing be which shall dawn upon all the emptied graves of earth, if oiAj
now we live in Christ ; if at death we sleep in Jesus ; if at that res-
urrection we be numbered with those who shall share the resurrec-
tion of the just.
J,ffc of Christ.
50
786 THE LIFE OF CHPvIST.
It.
Appearance to Mary Magdalene*
In relating the incidents of the resurrection, St. Matthew tells us
that it was Mary Magdalene and the other Mary, who, as the first
day of the week began to dawn, went out to the sepulchre. St. Mark
mentions Salome as having accompanied them. St. Luke introduces
the additional name of Joanna. St. John speaks of Mary Magda-
lene, and of her only. On the supposition that a number of those
women who came with Jesus from Galilee had agreed to complete as
early as possible the embalming of his body, and that they had either
started together from the city, or, being in different parts of it the
night before, had fixed to meet at early dawn at the sepulchre, we
can readily enough understand that each of the four independent
narrators might name one or more of them without specifying the
others. Looking, however, a little more closely into the four sepa-
rate accounts, we notice that, according to Matthew, the women on
their arrival found the stone removed from the entrance of the sepul-
chre, and an angel sitting upon it, who invited them to enter and look
at the place where the Lord had lain. Mark, making no allusion to
any vision of an angel without, says that they passed into the sepul-
chre, and, on entering, saw "a young man sitting at the right side,
clothed in a long white garment," who addressed to them nearly the
same words which Matthew puts into the mouth of the angel seeD
sitting upon the stone. Luke tells us that, finding the stone rolled
away, they entered in and found the sepulchre empty, and as they
stood perplexed at the discovery, " behold, two men stood by them
in shining garments," and spoke to them in terms and in a tone dif-
fering considerably from that attributed to the single angel by the
first two evangelists. It appears again, from the narrative of John,
that Mary Magdalene had seen no angel, had heard at least no an-
nouncement that the Lord was actually alive, when she hurried off
from the sepulchre in search of Peter and John. What are we to
make of these discrepancies ? Was it sometimes one and sometimes
two angels that appeared; were some eyes opened and some eyes
shut to the angelic visions ? Was it one visit, or two, or more, by
the same or different groups of women, which were paid to the sepul-
chre? Various attempts to answer such questions have been made;
various suppositions have been framed, the adoption of which, it has
* John 20 : 1-18.
APPEAEANCE TO MARY MAGDALENE. 787
been thought, would relieve the different accounts from conflicting
with one another; various modes of interlacing them, so as to form
out of them a continuous and consistent narrative, have been present-
ed. If it cannot be said that they have all absolutely failed, it must
be said that not one of them is entirely satisfactory. We cannot
doubt that if all the minor and connecting links were in our hands,
we should be able to explain what now seems to be obscure, to har-
monize what now seems to be conflicting; but in the absence of such
knowledge, we must be content to take what each writer tells us, and
regard it as the broken fragment of a whole, all the parts of which
are not in our hands, so that we can put them connectedly together.
But is not this fragmentary character of each of these four separate
accounts just what we might have expected, considering the time and
manner of the events narrated — the obscure light, the women com
ing, it may have been singly, or in different groups by different routes,
the surprise, the terror, the running in and out, to and from the city —
all this within the compass of an hour or two ? Which one of the
spectators or actors in these busy and broken movements, if asked
afterwards to detail what occurred, but might have given an account
of it differing from that of all the others ? And if any two of these
independent sources of information were applied to or made use of,
how readily might apparent contradictions emerge upon the face of
the narratives that were afterwards preserved. We do not know
from what particular sources Matthew, Mark, and Luke derived their
information. This special interest, however, attaches to the narra-
tive of John — it is partly that of an eye-witness, and partly drawn,
we cannot doubt, from what was told him by Mary Magdalene her-
self. Overlooking the part taken by all the other women, John con-
fines himself exclusively to her. Even as our Lord himself singled
her out from among the women who had ministered to him, to make
to her his first appearance after his resurrection, so does the beloved
disciple speak of her alone while he details to us the incidents of
that wonderful manifestation.
We feel as if a great injustice had been done to Mary Magdalene,
in identifying her with the woman who was a sinner, who anointed
the Lord's feet with ointment, and wiped them with the hairs of
her head. The name of that woman is not mentioned in the record
of the incident in which she took so prominent a part. The incident
occurred not in Magdala but at Nain. It was after Christ had left
Nain that the first mention of this Mary meets us in the gospel nar-
rative: "And it came to pass afterwards, that he went throughout
every city and village, preaching and showing the glad tidings of the
788 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
kingdom of God; and the twelve were with him, and certain women,
which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called
Magdalene, ont of whom went seven devils, and Joanna the wife of
Chuza, Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which min-
istered unto him of their substance." Named thus along with one
whose husband held an important office in Herod's household, named
as one of those who ministered to our Lord of their substance, Mary
Magdalene does not appear to have been a woman of a low or poor
condition. Neither have we any right to ground upon the fact that
seven devils had been cast out of her, the conclusion that she had
been a woman of depraved or dissolute habits. Satanic possession
carried then no more evidence along with it of previous immorality,
than insanity would do now among ourselves.
But whoever, whatever this Mary was, she was, as we have already
seen, one of the latest at the sepulchre on the evening of the burial,
and now she is one of the earliest at that sepulchre on the morning
of the resurrection. Perhaps, more eager than the rest, she had hur-
ried on before, and entered the garden alone. A quick glance, that
waited not to catch even the sight of the angel's form, had shown her
that the entrance was open, and the sepulchre empty. Overwhelmed
with sorrow at the sight; waiting not to hear the angel's intimation
that He had risen; leaping at once to the conclusion that hostile
hands had rifled the sacred tomb, her troubled fancy picturing to her
the indignities to which that form, beloved even in its lifelessness,
might have been subjected — Mary hurries back to the city. She
seeks the house to which John had carried the mother of our Lord.
She finds there both John and that other apostle, whom a strange
attraction has drawn now to John's side. She has but breath enough
to say, " They have taken away the Lord, and we know not where
they have laid him." Her eagerness of alarm passes, by sympathy,
into the hearts of the two apostles. They arise to run out together
to the sepulchre. John's lighter footstep, quickened by his more
ardent, more unburdened love, carries him soonest to the spot ; but,
at the entrance, his deep and reverential spirit holds him back in
awe. He stops, and bends, and looks into the grave. Peter, of
slower step, and still laboring, it may have been, under the burden of
self-reproach, is behind John in the race; but, bolder or more impet-
uous, he stops not at the door, but, passing John, goes at once into
the sepulchre. He draws his brother apostle after him, the one never
dreaming of the influence he thus exerts, the other as little thinking
of the influence he obeys. Both are now within, and have leisure to
look round upon the place. There the linen clothes are lying, with
APPEARANCE TO MARY MAGDALENE. 789
which Joseph and Nicodenms had swathed the body, and there, not
loosely flung upon them in a disordered heap, but carefully folded up
in a pb,ce by itself, lies that napkin which Mary herself may have
helped to bind around the thorn-marked brow. Who had arranged
them thus ? Was it the hand of the great Sleeper himself, on his
awakening within the tomb ? or was it some angel's hand that took
the death garments as they dropped from around the risen one, and
thus disposed them? Whoever did it, there had been no haste; all
had been done calmly, collectedly. Neither earthly friends nor earth-
ly foes had done it : the one would not have stripped the garments
from the body ; the other would have been at no pains so carefully
to arrange and deposit them. Peter, as he looks, is amazed, but his
amazement shapes itself into no connected thought ; he departs won-
dering in himself at that which had come to pass. John's quieter
and deeper reflection suggests at once the idea that what has taken
place is not a removal, but a reanimation of the body. An incipient
faith in the resurrection forms within his breast ; a faith grounded,
not as it might have been, and should have been, on what he had
already read or heard — for as yet neither he nor any of the apostles
knew from the Scripture, nor believed from Christ's own word, that
he must rise again from the dead — but grounded simply on what he
saw, and especially upon the singular condition which the interior of
the sepulchre displayed. That rising faith John kept to himself; he
never boasted that he was the first of all the twelve to believe in the
resurrection. Perhaps his first public mention of the fact was when,
so many years afterwards, he sat down to write that gospel which
bears his name.
The brief inspection of the empty sepulchre over — there being
nothing more to see or learn — John and Peter return silent and sad
to their own home. Mary Magdalene had followed them, as best
she could, in the running out to the sepulchre ; but she does not join
them in their return. Two evenings before, (when all but she and
the other Mary had left the tomb into which she had seen the
body borne for burial,) she had clung to it to the last, and this morn-
ing, she clings to it still. The Master whom she had lost had ren-
dered her the greatest of services ; had been to her the kindest and
best of friends. Her grateful love had clung to him while living;
and now this love, living in her sorrow, makes her cling, even when
John has loft it, to the spot where in death he had reposed. Mary
Magdalene, standing alone weeping thus before the empty sepulchre,
presents herself to our eye as the saddest and most inconsolable of
all the mourners for the Crucified. As she weeps, she stoops to take
790 THE LIFE OF GHEIST.
another look into the deserted place. She sees a sight that might
well have diverted her from her grief — two angels sitting, the one at
the head, the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain.
They saj to her, "Woman, why weepest thou?" Did you ever read
of a more absorbing grief than that she, who was addressed thus by
angels, should have no surprise, no astonishment to spare ; but, as if
unheeding who they were that spoke to her, should, out of the depths
of her engrossing sorrow, only be able to repeat what she had said
to Peter and John, varying the phrase a little — claiming a closer
property in the departed — "Because they have taken away my Lord,
and I know not where they have laid him." And she turns away,
even from an interview with angels, from converse with those who
may have had as their purpose in putting to her that question, to
tell her about her risen Lord. She turns away even from them,
to weep out, without further interruption, her most bitter grief.
But now, from other lips, the same question, " Woman, why weep-
est thou ?" salutes her ear. She sees, but scarcely notices, the person
who thus speaks to her. He is not directly before her, and she cares
not to turn, or make any minute scrutiny of his person. Even had
she done so, seeing him through the veil of dropping tears, she might
have failed to recognise him. She cares as little, in fact, about who
this speaker is, as she had cared about who those angels were.
Taking him to be one who did not need to be told why she wept,
who must know all about what had happened — the gardener of the
place — she says to him, in the simplest, most artless way, "Sir, if
thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I
will take him away." She is willing even to believe that it was with
no unkindly purpose he had been removed. Only let her know where
he is; and, all forgetful how unfit her weak hands were for such a
task, she says, " I will take him away." ' If it be an offence that he
lies here in this rich man's tomb, so near the holy city, I will bear him
away to some remoter burial-place, where he may lie in peace, and
where I may go and weep at will over his grave.'
Jesus saith unto her, " Mary." The old familiar voice ! It can be
only He who names her so. Instantly — fully — the revelation of his
living presence bursts upon her. She turns, and forgetting all about
the new strange circumstances in which she sees him, as if the former
days of their familiar intercourse had returned, she says, " Babboni !"
and stretches forth her hands to him. Jesus stops the movement.
" Touch me not," he says, " for I am not yet ascended to my Father ;
but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father
and your Father, and to my God and your God." This check upon
APPEARANCE TO MARY MAGDALENE. 791
the ardor of Mary's affectionate approach in the first moments of
r icognition, we can only understand by reflecting upon the object of
our Lord's sojourn upon the earth for the forty days after the resur-
roction.
There is a mystery which hangs around this singular period in
the life of our Redeemer. Why did he tarry so long upon the earth,
wIipu his work appeared to have been finished? What peculiar
service did that keeping empty so long his seat at his Father's right
hand render to his church and people ? During the first eight days,
on the first and last of which alone he showed himself in Jerusalem ;
was he treading unseen the streets of the holy city, or haunting the
household of the loved family of Bethany ? Those midnight hours ;
did they see him once again amid the dark shadows of Gethsemane,
praying now, not that the cup might be taken from him, but that the
fruits of this bygone passion might be gathered in ? The Sabbaths
of these days ; did they see him entering again the temple, passing
behind the rent veil into the holy of holies, quenching with his unseen
hand, and that for ever, the fire that had burned above the mercy-
seat ? During the weeks which followed, was he wandering an un-
seen spectator over the scenes of his earthly ministry; revisiting
Nazareth, reentering Capernaum, where most of his mighty works
had been done, looking in with kindly eye upon that nobleman's
family, all of whom had believed in him ; going out to Cana, casting
a passing glance at the dwelling in which the first of his miracles had
been performed ; lingering for a moment by the gate of the little city
of Nain, blessing once more, as he passed, the widow and her recov-
ered child?
It is an idle task, perhaps, for fancy to picture where or how
those forty days were spent. But it is not an unprofitable question
for us to put to ourselves, what ends could his lingering so long on
earth have served ? It cannot be supposed that the mere object of
affording proof enough that he was still alive, would have detained
him here so long. That could have been done in two days as well as
in forty. Besides, had that been the main object of his delay, why
did he not appear oftener in a more open and public manner than he
did ? Neither can it be imagined, that it was for the purpose of con-
tinued and enlarged intercourse with his disciples. The fewness and
shortness of his interviews with them preclude that belief. He was
seen by them but ten times in all; five of those appearances occur-
ring on the day of his resurrection ; and four of them, those to Mary,
to Peter, to James, to the two disciples, having more of a private
than of a public character. Out of the forty days there were but six
792 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
on which lie held intercourse with any human being, and in those six
days he did not give more than as many hours to fellowship with
those to whom he showed himself. How brief, too, generally, and
abrupt the meetings that made up the hours which were so employ-
ed ! In the twilight of the garden ; in the dim-lighted upper chamber ;
in the gray dawn of the lake side, he appears, speaks but a few sen-
tences, and vanishes as mysteriously as he had appeared. All be-
tokens a studied effort to stand aloof, to shun all close, prolonged,
familiar intercourse. What impression was all this studied distance
and reserve fitted to make upon the minds of his disciples? Put
yourselves into their exact position at this time ; remember that not
one of them before his death had risen to any thought or belief in
his divinity ; that from all their earlier earthly notions of him they
had to be weaned; that after days and years of the easiest compan-
ionship with him, they had to be raised to the belief that it was the
very Lord of heaven and earth with whom they had been holding
converse ; yet, that belief was to be so formed within them, as not to
militate against the idea of his true and proper humanity. See, then,
what an important part in the execution of this needful, but most
difficult task, must have been fulfilled by his mode of dealing with
them during the forty days.
For, let us only conceive what should have happened, if one or
other of the two alternatives had been realized : if at once, after a
few interviews, sufficient simply to do away with all doubt as to hi.*
resurrection, Jesus had passed up into the heavens, never to be seen
again on earth ; let us imagine that the descent of the Spirit had
immediately thereon ensued; that the day of Pentecost had followed
immediately on the day of the resurrection; that the eyes of the
apostles had thus at once and fully been enlightened, and the great
truth of their Master's Godhead had been flashed upon their minds ;
the danger undoubtedly would have been that, seen in the blaze of
that new glory, shining thus around his person, the man Christ Jesus
had been lost, the humanity swallowed up in the divinity ; nor would
it have been so easy to persuade those men that, ascended up on
high, seated at the right hand of the Father, he was the same Jesus
still — a brother to them as truly as when he lived among them,
equally alive to all human sympathies as when he walked with them
by the way, or sat down with them in the upper chamber.
Take, again, the other alternative; that after nis resurrection,
Christ had immediately resumed and continued — even let us say for
no longer a time than these forty days — the exact kind of life that
he had led before, returning to all his old haunts and occupations .
APPEARANCE TO MARY MAGDALENE. 793
spending a day or two with Lazarus and his sister at Bethany;
travelling up through Samaria, and sitting wearied by the well's
mouth, as before ; living in Peter's wife's sister's house, dining with
Pharisees; crossing the lake in the fishing boat; companying with
multitudes on mountain-sides; living and acting outwardly in every
respect as he had done before — would not such a return on his
part to all the old familiarities of his former intercourse, have had a
tendency to check the rising faith in his divinity ; to tie his disciples
down again to a knowing of him only after the flesh ; to give to the
humanity of the Lord such bulk and prominence as to make it in
their eyes overshadow the divinity? Can you conceive a treatment
more nicely fitted to the spiritual condition, to the spiritual wants of
those men at that time, than the very one which the Lord adopted
and carried out — so well fitted as it was, gradually, gently, without
violence, (as is ever the mode of his acting in all the provinces of his
spiritual empire,) to lead those disciples on from their first misty,
imperfect, unworthy ideas of his person, character, and work, on and
up to clearer, purer, loftier conceptions of Him? In what better
way could a faith in their Master's divinity have been superinduced
upon their former faith in him as a man, a friend, a brother, so that
the two might blend together without damage done to either by the
union; their knowledge of him as human, not interfering with their
trust in him as divine; their faith in him as God, not weakening
their attachment to him as man ?
"With this key in our hand — a key which unlocks much of the
mystery of our Lord's conduct throughout those forty days — let us
return to Mary in the garden. She sees Jesus alive once more
before her. She hears him as of old call her by her name. He is
hers, she thinks again ; hers, as he had been before ; hers, not to be
torn from her again. All the warmth of those former days of familiar
friendship filling her glad heart, she offers him not the homage of a
higher worship; but, addressing him as he did her, "Kabboni," she
says — my own, my old, my well-beloved Master ! She makes some
gesture as of embracing him. Gently, but firmly, our Lord repels
the too warm, too human, too familiar approach. "Touch me not,
Mary." 'You think of me as given back to be to you the same
exactly that I was before. You are mistaken; our relationship is
changed ; our method of intercourse must be altered ; you must
learn to think of me, and to act towards me, differently from what
you ever did before ; I am here, but it is only for a short season ; I
am on earth, but I am now on the way to my Father ; my home is
no longer with you and the others here below, it is there with my
70: THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
Father up in heaven; still shall I feel to you and all the others as
tenderly as I ever felt, not ashamed even to call them still my breth-
ren. Touch me not, then, Mary; stop not to lavish on me an affec-
tion that has in it too much of the human, too little of the divine;
but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend to my Father,
and to your Father, and to my God and your God ; my Father and
iny God in a sense in which he is not and cannot be yours ; but your
Father and your God in a sense in which he could not have been
yours had I not died and risen, and been on my way now to sit
down with Him on the throne of glory in the heaven.'
in.
The Journey to Emmaus.*
It was towards evening; the day was far spent when the two
disciples reached Emmaus; yet there was time enough for them,
after they had dined, to return by daylight to Jerusalem, (a distance
of about seven miles, a two or three hours' walk,) and to be present
at that evening meeting, in the midst of which Jesus was seen by
them once more. It must have been between mid-day and sunset
that the journey to Emmaus was taken. Of the two travellers, the
name of one only has been preserved; that of Cleopas, generally
believed to have been a near relation of Christ — the husband of the
Virgin Mary's sister. It was not, however, the closeness of the
relationship to Jesus which won for him the privilege of that strange
conversation by the way. Had nearness of relationship had anything
to do with the matter, there was one surely to whom, above all others,
we might have expected that he would appear on the day of his
resurrection. Yet neither on that day, nor on any of the forty days ho
spent on earth thereafter, does Jesus seem to have made any special
manifestation of himself to his mother, or indeed to have taken any
individual notice of her whatever. Her name does not once occur in
the record of this period of our Eedeemer's life. It looks as if with
that kindly, son-like notice of her from the cross, Jesus had dropped
the recognition of the earthly relationship altogether, as one not suit-
able to be carried into that kingdom to whose throne he was about
to ascend.
And as it was nothing in their outward relationship to Jesus, so
* Luke 24 : ia-33.
THE JOURNEY TO EMMAUS. 795
neither was it anything in the personal character, position, or ser-
vices of these two men which drew down upon them this great favor
from the Lord. They had occupied no prominent place beside the
Saviour in the course of his ministry. They had exhibited no pecu-
liar strength of attachment to him, or to his cause. Had Peter and
James and John been the travellers, it would not have been so
remarkable that he should have given them so many of the hours of
that first day of his resurrection life; more hours, in fact, than he
ever gave to any two disciples besides; nay, so far as we can meas-
ure them, more hours than he gave to any other interview of that
period — perhaps as many as were spent in all the other interviews
together, for generally they were very brief. What was there in
these two men to entitle them to such a distinction ? They were not
apostles, nor were they of any great note among the seventy. Our
Lord's first words to them may perhaps help us to understand why
it was that he joined himself to them. He has been walking beside
them, so close as to overhear somewhat of their conversation. But
they are so intent upon the topic which engrosses them, that they
notice not that a stranger has overtaken them, and been in part a
listener to their discourse. At last, in manner the easiest and most
natural, least calculated to give offence, expressive at once of interest
and sympathy, Jesus breaks in upon their discourse with the inquiry,
"What manner of communications are these that ye have to one
another, as ye walk and are sad?" That sadness, who can tell what
power it had in drawing the Man of sorrows to their side ? It was
to Mary, weeping in her lonely grief; to Peter, drowned in tears of
penitence — that he had already appeared. And now it is to these
two disciples in their sorrow that he joins himself : so early did the
risen Saviour assume the gracious office of comforting those who
mourn, of binding up the broken heart. But in Mary, Peter, and
these two disciples, three different varieties of human grief were dealt
with. Mary's was the grief of a grateful and affectionate heart,
mourning the loss of one beloved ; Peter's was the grief of a spirit
smitten with the sense of a great offence committed ; the grief of the
two disciples was that of men disappointed, perplexed, thrown into
despondency and unbelief. It is especially noticed that it was while
they communed together, and reasoned with one another, that Jesus
himself drew near to them. There was much about which they well
might differ and dispute. The yielding of their Master to the power
of his enemies, and his shameful crucifixion two days before — how
could they reconcile with his undoubted pretensions and power, as a
prophet so mighty in words and deeds? This one, that other say-
796 THE LIEE OF OHKIST.
ing of his, pointing to a future, never now, as they fancied, to be
realized, what could they make of them ? Had Jesus himself been
disappointed, deceived; had he imagined that the people would rise
on his behalf, and prevent his crucifixion? That might have been,
had he not so often shown that he knew all that was passing in
men s hearts. Could he, then, have been ignorant how the multitude
of Jerusalem would feel and act? There was truth, too, in what so
many of them had flung reproachfully in his teeth, as he hung upon
the cross : He had saved others, why did he not save himself ? What
a confused heap of difficulties must have risen up before these two
men's eyes as they reasoned by the way ! And then besides, there
was what they had heard just before they left the city — the report of
some women that they had gone out, and found the sepulchre empty,
and had seen angels, who had told them that he was alive. They,
indeed, might easily have been deceived; but Peter and John bad
also gone out. It is true they had seen no angels, nor had any one,
that they had heard of, seen the Lord himself. But the sepulchre
had been found empty. The women were right so far ; were they
right also in what they said about the angel's message ? Could
Jesus actually be alive again ? "We wonder that these two men could
have left the city at the time they did; we wonder at this perhaps
the more because we know that, had they but waited an hour or two
longer, they would have had all their doubts resolved. It is clear
enough, however, that neither of them had any faith in the resurrec-
tion; and as clear that they were dissatisfied with their unbelief —
altogether puzzled and perplexed. Ignorant, they needed to be
taught; deeply prejudiced, they needed to have their prejudices
removed. For hours and hours, for days and days, they might have
remained together without clearing up the difficulties that beset
them. But now, in pity and in love, the great Enlightener himself
appears — appears in the garb of a stranger who joins them by the
way. They do not at first, they do not at all through the earnest
conversation which follows, recognize him.
In reading the accounts of all the different appearances of Christ
after his resurrection, the conviction seems forced upon us, that some
alteration had taken place in the aspect of our Saviour, enough to
create a momentary hesitation in recognizing him, yet not enough,
after a closer inspection, to leave any doubt as to his identity. In
the garden, Mary Magdalene was so absorbed in her sorrow, so
utterly unprepared to meet the living Master — she looked so indi-
rectly, with such a heedless glance at the stranger, whom she took
to be the gardener — that we do not wonder at her failing to see at
THE JOURNEY TO EMMAUS. 797
first who lie was. So soon, however, as her name was uttered, and
she turned and fixed that steadier look upon the speaker, the recog-
nition was complete. To the women by the way, to whom next he
showed himself, his very salutation revealed him, and left them no
room for doubting that it was he. They held him by the feet, too,
for a moment or two, as they worshipped, and got the evidence of
touch as well as sight to assure them of his bodily presence. That
evening, in the upper chamber, the disciples were assembled. They
could not be taken by surprise. They were prepared by the reports
of Mary Magdalene, of the women, of Peter, of the two disciples from
Emmaus, to believe that he was alive ; yet when Jesus stood in the
midst of them, they supposed that they had seen a spirit ; so troubled
were they at the sight, so incredulous were they even as they looked
at him, that he had to say to them : " Why are ye troubled, and why
do thoughts arise in your heart? Behold my hands and my feet,
that it is I myself; handle me, and see, for a spirit hath not flesh and
bones as ye see me have;" and still further, to remove all doubt, he
asked that some meat should be presented, and he took the piece of
the broiled fish and the honeycomb, and did eat them in their pres-
ence. It may have been the sudden apparition of Christ in the midst
of them, while the doors of the chamber remained unopened, which,
in part, begot the belief that it was a spirit that stood before them ;
but that there was something too in the changed appearance of their
Master, which helped to sustain that belief, is evident, from what is
told us of his next appearance by the lake side of Galilee. John's
quick's eye and ear recognized him from the boat; but when they
had all landed and gathered round him, " None of them," it is said,
"durst ask him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord."
Whence the desire to put such a question, but from a passing shad-
owy doubt, and whence the doubt but from some change in his
appearance? When afterwards, on the mountain which he had
appointed, Jesus showed himself to above five hundred brethren at
once, they saw him, and worshipped ; but some, it is said, doubted —
those, let us believe, who saw him then for the first and only time,
and on whom the sight seems to have had the same effect that it had
in the first instance on nearly all who witnessed it. It seems to us
the best, if not the only way of accounting for this, to suppose that
the resurrection body of our Lord had passed through a stage or
two in its transition from the natural into the spiritual body; from
its condition as nailed upon the cross, to its etherealized and glori-
fied condition as now upon the throne ; the flesh and blood which
cannot inherit the heavenly kingdom, still there, yet so modified as to
798 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
be more plastic under the power of the indwelling spirit, less subject
to the material laws and conditions of its earlier being, the corrupti-
ble on its way to the incorruptible, the mortal putting on the clothing
of immortality. And that strange, half spiritual appearance which
the risen Lord presented, may it not have served to further the great
end that our Lord had in view throughout the forty days, namely, to
wean the minds of his disciples from their earlier, lower, more human
conceptions of him, to a true faith in his mingled humanity and
divinity ?
There was, however, something special, I believe, in this instance
of the two disciples travelling to Emmaus. They might not have
recognized him, as, clothed perhaps in the garb of an ordinary trav-
eller, he put his first questions to them by the way; but when he
assumed the office of their instructor, and, showing such intimate
acquaintance with the Scriptures, made their hearts burn within
them, as he unfolded their new meaning, must they not many a time
have turned on him a very searching look, wondering, as they looked,
who this strange teacher possibly could be ? Yet were two or three
hours spent in that close and earnest conversation, without their
once suspecting that it was the Lord. How accurately does this
accord with the differing statements of Mark and Luke ! Mark dis-
tinctly tells us that he appeared to them in another, in a strange
form — a form different from that in which they had seen him previ-
ously. He appeared to them, as to all the others, somewhat changed
in aspect ; but had that been all, they would speedily have recovered
from their first surprise, and ere many minutes, would have identi-
fied him. For a reason, however, hereafter to be alluded to, our
Lord purposely concealed himself till his work of instruction was
completed, and drew a veil of some kind over their eyes, which hin-
dered their discovery of him by the way.
He comes to them as an entire stranger, such as they might nat-
urally have met upon the road ; and it is as a stranger that through-
out he converses with them. " What manner of communications," he
says, "are those that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are
sad?" Little need, thought one of them (his own deep interest in
them leading him, perhaps, to exaggerate that felt by the general
community) — little need of asking such a question. Of what could
any two men leaving Jerusalem, only two days after that crucifixion
had occurred — of what else than of it, and him the Crucified, could
they be talking? "Art thou only," says Cleopas, "a stranger in
Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass
there in these days?" And the stranger says to him, "What things?"
THE JOURNEY TO EMMAUS. 799
Thus it is, by questions needless for him on his own account to put,
but very useful to them to answer, that Jesus draws out from them
that statement, which at once reveals the extent of their ignorance
and incredulity, but, at the same time, the amount of their belief, the
strength of their attachment to Christ, and the bitterness of that grief
which the disappointment of their expectations regarding him had
created. A stranger though this man is to them, they do not hesi-
tate to confess their faith in Jesus of Nazareth as a prophet mighty
in words and deeds ; obnoxious as they know the now hated sect to
be, they do not hesitate to acknowledge themselves openly as disci-
ples of this persecuted and now crucified Nazarene, though the hope
they once had, that he should have been the Eedeemer of Israel,
they must confess themselves to have relinquished. Nay, so far has
the kindly and sympathizing inquiry of this stranger won for him a
way into their confidence, that, as if he must be interested in all that
concerned the discipleship of Jesus, they tell him what certain wom-
en of their company, and certain others of themselves, had reported
about the sepulchre.
The stranger's end is gained. The wound has been gently probed ;
its nature and extent revealed ; and now the remedy is to be applied.
He who had asked to be informed, takes the place of the instructor ;
he who had been reproached for his ignorance, reproaches in his turn.
"O fools, and slow of heart to believe !" Slow of heart indeed, and
difficult to convince had they been, who, after such explicit declara-
tions of his own beforehand, that he should be delivered up to the
rulers, and suffer many things at their hands, and be crucified, and
rise again the third day, had nevertheless remained so obstinate in
their incredulity. Truly the rebuke was needed. Yet how faithful
are the wounds of a friend; he wounds but to heal; he rebukes the
unbelief, but instantly proceeds to remove its grounds, even as he
rose from his slumber in the storm-tossed fishing-boat, first to rebuke
the disciples for their unbelieving fears, and then to quiet the tem-
pest which had produced them. The one great, misleading preju-
dice of the disciples had been their belief that the path of the prom-
ised Messiah was only to be one of triumph and of glory. To rectify
that error, it was only required that they should be made to see that
the predicted triumph and glory were alone to be reached through the
dark avenues of suffering and of death. u O fools, and slow of heart
to believe all that the prophets have spoken : ought not Christ to
have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory V And begin-
ning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded to them in all the
Scriptures the things concerning himself." Either Christ, then, is
800 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
not himself to be believed — in which case it were useless to hear and
read anything about him — or in those Old Testament Scriptures there
are to be seen everywhere prophetic fingers pointing forward to Him.
To search those Scriptures, and to find little or nothing there of
Christ, little or nothing to show how it behooved him to suffer, and
then to enter into his glory, is to handle them after a very different
fashion from that in which they were handled by our Lord himself.
It is not likely that these three travellers had a copy of the Old
Testament in their hands. It was not by reference to chapter and
verse, that the exposition of the Saviour was conducted ; it was by
no minute criticism of words and phrases, that the conviction of
these wayfaring men was carried. They were familiar generally with
the Scriptures. One or two of the leading prophecies about the Mes-
siah, such as that first one of God himself in paradise, as to the seed
of the woman and the serpent; such as that of Moses as to the rais-
ing up of a prophet like unto himself ; such as that of Isaiah, when
he saw his glory, and testified beforehand of the sufferings by which
that glory should be preceded and entered ; such as that of Daniel
about the Messiah being cut off, but not for himself — Jesus may have
quoted. But not alone from direct and specific prophecies — from
the paschal lamb, and the smitten rock, and the serpent of brass, and
the blood-sprinkled mercy-seat, but from the whole history of the
Jewish people — from the entire circle of types and ceremonies and
sacrifices, did Jesus draw forth the materials of that wonderful expo-
sition by which, for two hours or so, he kept those listening men hang-
ing upon his lips. As we think who the expounder in that instance
was, and what the materials of his exposition, how natural the ex-
pression, Would that I had heard all these things concerning Christ
illustrated by Christ himself ! But have we not the substance of that
exposition, as much of it as is needful for us to have, preserved in
the writings of the New Testament, and may we not be sure that if
we believe not them, neither would we be persuaded though one rose
from the dead, as Jesus that morning had done, and should teach u 6 *
even as he taught those two disciples?
There was something indeed peculiarly, sublimely interesting in
that two hours' walk and talk of these three men on the way to
Emmaus. Had you been on that road that day, had you met those
travellers as they journeyed on, beyond the earnestness of their con-
versation with one another, you would have seen nothing remarkable
about them, nothing to make you turn and look back upon them as
they passed. Two of them are men in humble attire, travelling in
the humblest fashion, returning to one of the humblest village-he mes '
THE JOURNEY TO EMMAIJS. 801
and the third, there is nothing about him different in appearance from
the other two ; nothing to keep them from conversing with him as an
equal, one with whom the most unrestrained familiarity might be
used. Yet who is He ? He who that very morning had burst the
barriers of the grave ; he in honor of whose exit from the tomb an-
gels from heaven had been despatched to watch at the foot and at
the head of the sacred spot, where in death his body had for a time
reposed; he who was now upon his way to enter into that glory
which he had with the Father before the world was — incarnate Deity
fresh from the conflicts and the victories of the garden, the cross, the
sepulchre. It is literally God walking with men, men walking, though
they knew it not, with God. History tells us of earthly sovereigns
stripping themselves at times of all the tokens and trappings of roy-
alty, for the purpose of mixing on equal terms with the humblest of
their people; but h" story never told, and imagination never pictured
a disguise, an incognito like this. But why was that disguise adopt-
ed, and, in this instance, so long preserved? Why, instead of doing
as he did with the eleven, first manifesting himself, and then opening
their understanding to understand the Scriptures, did he keep him-
self unknown all the time that the work of exposition was going on?
May it not have been to obtain such a simple, natural, easy access
for the truth into these two men's minds and hearts, as to give it
even when unsupported by the weight of his own personal authority,
a firmer and securer hold ? Whatever may have been its more spe-
cial object as regards the two disciples, wonderful indeed was that
condescension of our Lord which led him to give so many hours oj
his first resurrection-day to this humble office. Many a proud scribe
in Jerusalem would have recoiled from it, have deemed it a waste of
his precious time, if asked to accompany two such humble men, and
spend so much of one of his Sabbaths in instructing them out of the
Scriptures. The divine Redeemer himself thought it not a task too
lowly; and by devoting, in his own person, so much of that first
Christian Sabbath to it, has he not at once loft behind him a pattern
of what all true and faithful exposition of the sacred Scriptures ought
to be, even the unfolding of the things touching a once crucified, but
now exalted Saviour; and has he not dignified, by himself engaging
in it, the work of one man's trying, at any time, or in any way, to
lead another to the knowledge of the truth as it is in Jesus ?
It was with heavy hearts that the two disciples had left Jerusa-
lem ; and had all the journey been like the first few paces of it, it
had seemed a long way to Emmaus. But they are at the village now,
and the road had never appeared so short. Had they imagined they
Life of Cluiit. 51
802 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
could be there so soon, they would have lingered on the road. Aud
now this stranger, whose discourse had so beguiled the way, and
made their hearts so burn within them, makes as if he would go far-
ther. Emmaus, it would seem, is not his resting-place. But how can
they part from him ? How may that conversation, which has shed
such a fresh light into their understandings, such a new hope into
their hearts, be prolonged? They invite, they urge him to remain.
He gives, he makes the opportunity for their constraining him to be
their guest. He acts as he had done with the two blind beggars ;
with the disciples in the storm ; with the Syrophcenician woman.
He suffers violence to be used with him; and then, when he has
brought out all the strength of desire and affection towards him in
the earnest entreaty, he yields to the urgency he had himself excited.
The two disciples constrain him, and he goes in apparently to abide
with them. They have him now, as they think, with them for the
whole evening ; and what an evening it shall be, when, supper over,
the conversation of the wayside may be renewed. The humble table
is quickly spread. This is the home, it has been thought, of one of
the two disciples, and he whose home it is prepares to do the duty
of the host. That duty is taken out of his hands. The mysterious
sti anger takes the bread; he blesses, he breaks, he gives. Who but
One could bless and break and give in such a way as this? The
scales fall from the disciples' eyes. 'T is he, their own lost but now
recovered Lord and Master. Let him wait but a moment or two>
they shall be clasping him, as Mary would fain have done, to their
hearts, or, falling down, as the women did, and worshipping at his
feet. Time is not given them. He reveals himself, and disappears.
This moment known by them, the next vanishing from their sight.
IV.
The Evening Meeting.*
When they left Jerusalem on the afternoon of the first day of the
week, the two disciples had intended to remain that night, perhaps
permanently, at Emmaus. The Paschal Sabbath over, they had
resolved to return to their village home, to their old way of living,
burying, as best they could, their expectations disappointed. But
the conversation by the way, the manifestation in the breaking of
* Mark 16 : 13, U ; Luke 24 : 33-49 ; John 20 : 19-23.
THE ETTBNING MEETING. 803
bread, that revealed and vanishing presence of their risen Lord,
altered the whole current of their thoughts and acts. They could
not stay at Emmaus. Late as it was, they instantly arose and
returned to Jerusalem. How quickly, how eagerly would they
retrace their steps! What manner of communications would those
be that they would now have with one another; how different from
those which Jesus had interrupted ; the incredulity turned now into
faith, the sadness into joy. The stranger who had made their hearts
burn within them, on their way out to the village, he too was travers-
ing at the same time the road they took on their way back to Jeru-
salem. But he did not join them now; he left them to muse in
silence on all they had seen and heard, or to add to each other's
wonder, gratitude, and gladness, by talking to one another by the
way. Their hearts were now full of the desire to tell to the brethren
they had left behind in the city all that had happened. On reaching
Jerusalem, they get at once the opportunity they so much desire. A
meeting of the apostles, and of as many others as they could conve-
niently call together, or could entirely trust, had quietly, somewhat
stealthily convened ; the first, we may believe, since the Thursday
evening meeting in the upper chamber. And where but in that same
chamber can we imagine that this Sunday evening assembly gather-
ed ? The doors were closed against intruders, but these two well-
known disciples from Emmaus are easily recognized, and at once
admitted. In what an agitated, conflicting state of thought and feel-
ing do they find those assembled there! They had all heard the
reports of the women and of Mary Magdalene ; but they say little or
nothing about them ; perhaps give them little credit. But there is
Peter, whom no one can well distrust, telling all the particulars of
his interview, and carrying the conviction of so many, that they are
joyfully exclaiming; " The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to
Simon." But this is not the general, not at least the universal state
of sentiment. The two disciples tell their tale, but it falls on many
an incredulous ear. They are as little believed as the women and
Mary Magdalene had been. They are trying all they can by a
minute recital of how Jesus had been known of them, to remove the
incredulity, when suddenly, coming as a spirit cometh, casting no
shadow before him, the doors not being open to let him in, no sight
nor so and giving token of his approach, Jesus himself is in the midst
of them, and his "Peace be unto you" stills at once the conflicting
conversation that had been going on. The manner of this appear-
ance may have been wholly miraculous and supernatural, or it may
have been partly or wholly due to those new properties with which
804: THE LIFE OE OHEIST.
the resurrection body of the Saviour was endowed. Upon this diffi*
cult, topic I have already said all it seems needful or perhaps possible
to say. We must leave it clothed with the mystery which surrounds
it. No mystery, however, hangs round the kindly, condescending
manner in which Jesus proceeds to deal with the terror which his
sudden appearance had created. He points to his hands, his feet,
his side, to the marks of those wounds that told of his recent death ;
marks which it pleased him that his resurrection body should still
bear ; marks which, it would seem from the apocalyptic vision, were
not to be effaced even from that glorified body which he carried to
the throne ; marks which that form is to wear for ever, the only visi-
ble memorials that are to survive of the great decease accomplished
at Jerusalem. Jesus asks them to handle him ; an invitation which
it is difficult to say whether they accepted or not. He shows them
his hands and his feet; and while yet they believe not for joy and
wonder, he seeks still further to remove their incredulity, by showing
them that he has still the power, though no longer the need, of par-
taking with them of their ordinary food. He eats of the fish and of
the honeycomb. Doubt now gives place to conviction, fear to be-
lieving joy; a joy so fresh, so full, that it in turn begins to shake the
new-born faith. How true to nature all this rapid succession of con*
flicting sentiments. Now at last, however, that little company of
disciples has settled into a condition fitting it to listen, and Jesus
returns to the subject that had engrossed the conversation on the
way out to Emmaus; to this larger, more influential audience he un-
folds the testimony that Moses, the prophets, the Psalms — all the
three divisions into which the Scriptures of the Old Testament were
classified by the Jews — rendered to his Messiahship ; dwelling par-
ticularly upon the topic most suited to the existing condition of their
thoughts, how, in accordance with all that had been beforehand
declared and signified, it behooved him, as the Christ, to suffer and
then to rise again the third day. " Then opened he their understand-
ing, that they might understand the Scriptures." Wherever, there-
fore, in the writings of any one of these Christ-taught men they refer
an important passage of the Old Testament to the Messiah, we may
conclude that they had for doing so the direct and authoritative
sanction of our Lord's own interpretation.
But his Messiahship, his death, his resurrection, were not matters
in which they alone, their nation alone, were interested. Now that
the needful work of suffering and death was over; now that the won-
derful exhibition at once of the sacredness of the Divine law, the
holiness of the Divine character, the deep unutterable love of God,
THE EVENING MEETING. 805
had been given ; now, wide over all the world, were repentance and
remission of sin to be proclaimed in his name ; and they, the men to
whom Jesus was then speaking, were to be the witnesses, the heralds,
the preachers of this large and all-embracing gospel of peace on earth,
iJid good-TV ill on God's part towards all the children of men : the first
%nd earliest hint this of the nature and the extent of their great com-
mission ; a hint which they did not then understand, which they did
not understand even under the enlightening and quickening influence
of the day of Pentecost. So far their understanding was opened, that
they saw clearly now that Christ ought to have suffered these things,
and then to enter into his glory ; but their understanding was shut as
to that proclamation of God's forgiving mercy and love, which now
in the name of Jesus was to be borne abroad over the whole earth.
But though it was to be left to time, and the after teachings of
the Spirit, to lift them out of their narrow conceptions of the Divine
love to man, as if its outgoings were to be limited to the pale of any
one community upon earth, still an initial impression of the sacred-
ness of their vocation as his disciples, of the manner in which the
duties of that vocation could alone properly be discharged, and of the
blessed and enduring results which were to follow in the train of that
discharge, might be made upon their minds. And this was the result
which Jesus, in the most striking and solemn manner, proceeded now
to bring about : the first step taken by him in the gradual and slow-
moving process of qualifying them for that mission which they, and
all other disciples of the Saviour after them, were to undertake and
carry out.
Then said Jesus unto them again, "Peace be unto you!" His
first greeting, in which the same words had been used, they had been
too surprised and affrighted to listen to, or take home. Now that
their minds had become more composed, that they had settled down
into a tranquil and joyful conviction that it was indeed their risen
Lord who was in the midst of them, he repeats the greeting ; repeats
it that they might not take it — though it was the common salutation
phrase he used, as meant merely to be the usual greeting with which
Jew met Jew in the ordinary intercourse of life ; that they m'ght not
take it as a mere expression of good-will, a wish for their welfare ;
but that they might have their thoughts thrown back upon what,
three evenings before, he had said to them : " Peace I leave with
jou, my peace I give unto you : not as the world giveth, give I unto
you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid."
He had said so with the cross, with the sepulchre before him. And
now the peace having been secured, and sealed by the blood of the
806 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
cross and the rising from the sepulchre, with a new emphasis he says
to them, * Peace, my peace, peace with God, peace of conscience, the
peace of pardon be unto you ; take it as coming to you through me ;
enter into, and enjoy it as the fruit of my passion, as God's free gift
to you in me. Let the quickening, the comforting assurance that
God is at peace with you, that you are at peace with God, take pos-
session of your hearts ; that, having tasted and seen that the Lord is
gracious, you may be prepared for executing the high errand on
which I am about to send you forth, that of publishing everywhere
the gospel of this peace; preaching peace by me to them that are
afar off, and to them that are nigh ; " For as my Father sent me,
even so now send I you." I send you forth in my name, and I will
qualify you by my Spirit.' And having said so, he breathed on them,
and said, " Receive ye the Holy Ghost" — an outward and expressive
symbol of the twofold truth, that dead, motionless, useless for all the
common work of this earthly existence, as lay that dust which the
hand of the Creator moulded into human form till he breathed into it
the breath of his natural life, so dead, motionless, useless for the
work of our Christian calling do we all lie, till the breath of true
spiritual life be breathed into us by the Holy Ghost. And as it was
from the lips of the risen Saviour that the breath proceeded, which
spread out upon the little company at Jerusalem, so is it from the
risen, exalted Saviour that the Spirit comes, whose life-giving influ-
ences spread over the whole church of the first-born. But specially
upon this occasion was the breathing of Jesus upon the disciples,
and the gift which accompanied that breathing, meant to indicate
that the mission on which Jesus was sending these disciples out —
that of being witnesses for him — was one that could alone be dis-
charged by those who, through him, had received more or less of that
heavenly gift. It was this impartation of the Spirit, which was to
form the one, indispensable qualification for the work ; without which
it could not be done. We know, historically, that it was but a very
limited measure of this gift which was actually, upon this occasion,
bestowed. The Holy Ghost was not yet in his fulness given, because
that Jesus was not yet glorified. The more plentiful effusion of this
gift was reserved for the day of Pentecost. That Spirit, who was to
convince of sin, and to lead into all truth, began even then, indeed,
his gracious work in the minds and hearts of these disciples, by con-
vincing them of their unbelief and hardness of heart, and by opening
their minds to understand the Scriptures. This was but an earnest
of better things to come — a few sprinkled drops of that fuller bap*
fcism wherewith they were afterwards to be baptized ; but yet enough
THE EVENING MEETING. 807
to teach that it was by Spirit-taught, Spirit- moved men — by men in
whose breasts the heaven-kindled fire of the true spiritual life had
begun to burn — that the commission Jesus had been giving could
alone be executed. And let not those to whom Jesus is now speak-
ing, speaking as the heads and representatives of the whole body of
his true followers upon earth; let them not think, weak as they are,
powerless as they appear, that, in going forth to proclaim in his
name, to every penitent transgressor, the free, full, instant, gracious
pardon of all his sins, they are embarking in an ideal, unreal work —
a work of which they shall never know whether they are succeeding
ii it 01 not.
- No,' says the Saviour ; ' Partake of the peace I now impart, ac-
cept the commission I now bestow; go forth in my name; receive ye
the Holy Ghost to guide you ; announce the news of God to sinners ;
proclaim the remission of sins, and, verily I say, whosesoever sins ye
thus remit, they are remitted ; whosesoever sins ye retain, they are
retained.' Such I take to be the real spirit and objocts of these last
words of Jesus, as spoken by him to his disciples at this time ; words
spoken to animate them in their after work by the assurance that
they should not labor in vain ; that what they should do on earth
should be owned and ratified in heaven. It were to misinterpret the
incidents of that evening meeting ; it were to mibtake the simple, im-
mediate, and precise object which, in using them, our Lord had in
view, to explain these words, as if they were intended to clothe the
eleven apostles, and after them, their successors or representatives —
to clothe any class of officials in the church, exclusively, with a power
of remitting and retaining sins. Where is the evidence that, as ori-
ginally spoken, the words were addressed exclusively to the eleven ?
There were others present as well as they. "The two disciples,"
Luke tells us, "found the eleven gathered together, and those that
were with them." These other members of the infant church, with
the two disciples, had the benediction pronounced on them, as well
as on the eleven ; the instructions were given to them as well as
to the eleven ; the breath was breathed on them as well as on the
eleven. Had Jesus meant, when he spake of this remitting and re-
taining sins, to restrict to the eleven the power and privileges con
ferred, should he not by some word or token have made it manifest
that such was his desire ? At other times he was at pains to single
out the twelve, when he had something meant for their eyes and their
ears alone. Is it likely that at this time he would have omitted to
draw a line between them and the others who were before him, had
it been to them that these closing words were exclusively addressed ?
808 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
But we have another and still stronger reason for not believing in
any such restriction. Jesus had once before used words of nearly
the same import with those that are now before us, and he had ad-
dressed them to the disciples at large : " Moreover, if thy brother
sLall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and
him alone : if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But
if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in
the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church : but if
he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as a heathen
man and a publican. Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall
bind on earth shall be bound in heaven ; and whatsoever ye shall
loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Again I say unto you, That
if two of you shall agree on earth as touching anything that they
shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.
For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am
I in the midst of them." The two concluding verses, as well as the
preceding context, contain the conclusive evidence, that it was not to
any select class or order of his followers that Jesus said, " Whatso-
ever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven ; and whatso-
soever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." (Matt
18:15-20.)
We are not in the least disposed to doubt, that while Christ
speaks of the remitting and the retaining of sins as pertaining to the
church at large, his words cover the acts of the church in her organ-
ized capacity, the inflicting and removing of ecclesiastical censures
through her office-bearers in the exercise of discipline. Here, how-
ever, we have two remarks to make : First, that it is only so far as
these acts are done by spiritual men, seeking and following the guid
ance of the Spirit, only so far as they are in accordance with Christ's
own expressed will, that they are of any avail, or can plead any heav-
enly ratification ; and, secondly, that all the force they carry is nothing
more or less than an authoritative and official declaration of what
that will of the Lord is. Neither in any man, in any pope or any
priest, in any community, or in any ecclesiastical court, lies the
absolute, the independent, the arbitrary power to absolve the sinner
from his sins. But did not he, we are asked, with whom alone it is
acknowledged that that power rests, appoint the eleven as his eartlilj
delegates, and in the commission here given them, convey into theii
jkanfts as such, that power? Just as little as in two other commis-
sions given to two of the old prophets, he handed over to them that
power over the kingdoms and nations of the earth which we rightly
THE EVENING MEETING. 809
believe and affirm resides alone in the hands of the Almighty.
"Then the Lord put forth his hand, and touched my mouth: and
the Lord said unto me, Behold, I have put my words in thy mouth
See, I have this day set thee over the nations, and over the king-
doms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw
down, and to build, and to plant." Jer. 1: 9, 10. "It came to pass
also in the twelfth year, in the fifteenth day of the month, that the
word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, wail for the
multitude of Egypt, and cast them down, even her, and the daugh-
ters of the famous nations, unto the nether parts of the earth, with
them that go down into the pit." Ezek. 32 : 17, 18.
Here, in terms not less distinct than those in which Christ gives
his disciples power over the sins of men, to remit or to retain, God
gives to the two prophets power over the nations to cast down and
to destroy. The true interpretation of the grant or commission is in
both cases the same. In the exercise of any power, inherent or
delegated, natural or acquired, Jeremiah and Ezekiel were altogether
impotent of themselves to overturn a nation; in the exercise of any
power, original or conferred, personal or official, the apostles were
just as impotent to remove any sinner's guilt. The prophet's func-
tion was limited to the denouncing of a doom which it was for the
hand of Jehovah alone to execute. The chui-jh's function is as
strictly limited to the announcing of a pardon which it is for the
grace of the heavenly Forgiver alone to bestow. And if, in execu-
ting that simple but most honorable office of proclaiming unto all
men that there is remission of sins through the name of Jesus, she
teaches that it is alone through her channels — through channels
that priestly or ordained and consecrated hands can alone open — the
pardon cometh, she trenches upon the rights and prerogatives of
Him whom she represents, and turns that eye upon herself that
should be turned alone on him.
But it is the gracious office of the church, of every individual
member thereof, of every distinct community thereof, in the sense
here indicated, to absolve the sinner, to assure him of the divine
forgiveness, to help him to believe in that forgiveness. Wherever
the gospel of the grace of God is preached, not generally, but point-
edly, to an individual man, and he is entreated and encouraged to
take hold of peace, to accept of pardon, to trust in the mercy of
Tesus, to believe in the forgiving love of God — then is that office of
^emitting sins in the name of Jesus undertaken and discharged. Two
illustrative instances occur to us; the one public and official, the
other private and personal. The first is that of the penitent offender
810 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
at Corinth, who was in clanger of being swallowed up of overmuch
soitow. Assuming that it lay with the church to extend her forgive-
ness to that offender, desiring to do nothing upon his own individual
authority, claiming no exclusive power of priestly absolution, Paul
'mites the Corinthian believers to deal tenderly, forgivingly with
Jiat man, and to receive him back into their communion, telling
them that he was quite prepared to go along with them in such
treatment of the penitent. "Wherefore I beseech you," he says,
"that you would confirm your love toward him. To whom ye for-
give anything, I forgive also ; for if I forgave anything, to whom I
forgave it, for your sakes forgave I it, in the person of Christ." The
great object was to make the repentant one feel how wide, how
generous, how cordial and unreserved was the forgiveness which the
church extended to him, that he might all the more confidingly
repose in that other sympathy, that other forgiveness, which, far as
the heavens are above the earth, are above all the sympathy, all the
forgiveness of man.
Our other instance belongs to a late period in the life of the
beloved disciple. It lies beyond the period embraced in the New
Testament history, but is well authenticated. When the tyrant who
sent John to Patmos was dead, the apostle returned to Ephesus.
Engaged in a visitation of the neighboring churches, he saw in one
of them a youth of so attractive an appearance that he specially
committed him to the care and guardianship of the bishop, or chief
minister of the church. The minister took the youth to his own
home, cherished him, educated him, and at length baptized him.
As he grew up, however, the care of his guardian relaxed, and he
fell into the company of a band of idle and dissolute youths, who
plunged together into a career of sin which led to the committal of
offences that exposed them to the severest penalties of the law.
Escaped from all restraint, and forming his association into a band
of robbers, the youth became their captain, surpassing all of them in
deeds of violence and blood. Time ran on, and the aged apostle
once more visited the same church. He asked about the youth, and
wept when he heard his story. He took his way instantly to the
district which the robber-band infested, and was taken prisoner by
the outguard of the banditti. He neither tried to fly nor offered any
resistance to his captors. "Conduct me to your captain," he said to
them; "I have come for the very purpose of seeing him." As soon
as he recognized the venerable apostle advancing towards him, the
captain would have fled; but the apostle pursued him, crying out,
f 'Why dost thou fly, my son, from me thy father—thy defenceless
THE INCREDULITY OF THOMAS. 811
aged father ? Have compassion on me, my son. Fear not, thou still
hast hope. I will intercede with Christ for thee. Believe that
Christ hath sent me." The fugitive was arrested. They met once
more. The apostle entreated him ; prayed with him ; solemnly assured
him that there was pardon for him at the hands of Christ ; md did
not leave him till he led him back again, and restored him to the
church. In the manner of his restoring that erring youth, the be-
loved apostle showed how thoroughly he had imbibed the spirit of
his divine Master, from whose lips half a century before he had lis-
tened to the words, "Whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted."
The Incredulity of Thomas.*
Was it his fault, or his misfortune simply, that Thomas' was not
present at that first meeting on the evening of the day of the resur-
rection? Clearly enough, we cannot charge his absence with the
same kind of neglect, with which now a refusal to join in the ordinary
services of the sanctuary would be loaded ; for no such services had
then been instituted, nor had any authority, human or divine, as yet
prescribed them. That evening conference, hastily summoned under
the prompting of the strange incidents of the day, wa's, in fact, the
first of those assemblings on the Lord's day which have since be-
er me one of the established customs of Christianity. But as no
such custom had as yet been established, Thomas cannot be accused
of violating it. The circumstances, however, under which that con-
ference was held, were so peculiar, the pressure which prompted it
so urgent, that we cannot imagine that any slight or fortuitous im-
pediment would have kept any one of the eleven away. It may,
therefore, have been Thomas' extreme incredulity as to the fact of
the resurrection, the utter and blank despair into which the death of
his Master had cast him, which indisposed him to join the rest. If
it were so ; if he kept aloof from his brethren as believing that no
good could come from their assembling; that it was all over with
the hopes as to their Master which they had been cherishing; that
they were mere idle tales which had been circulating about his hav-
ing risen from the dead — then, for his neglect of all that Jesus had
predicted about his death and resurrection, and for his treatment of
* John 20 : 24 20.
812 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
the testimony of Peter and the other early visitors of the sepulchre,
he was amply punished, in losing that sight of the risen Jesus given
to the others, and in his being left, for the seven days that fob
lowed, to the wretchedness of uncertainty and doubt — an uncer-
tainty and doubt which would be all the bitterer, as contrasted with
the unclouded convictions and new-born joy of his brother disciples.
While they, lifted from the depths of their despair, were congratu-
lating one another on the great triumph over death and the grave
which their Master had achieved, were strengthening each other's
faith, and heightening each other's joy, he, alone and disconsolate,
was scraping together the scanty food on which his incredulity might
nourish itself. In the course of that week, his brethren made many
attempts to rid him of his distrust. But all in vain ; the more they
insisted, the more he refused. The stronger they affirmed the proof
to be, the more inflexible became his resolution to resist it. The
particulars of the manifold conversations and discussions which
would, no doubt, go on between them, are not preserved. All that
is told is, that he took and kept resolutely to that position behind
which he had entrenched himself, as he said, "Except I shall see in
his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of
the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe." "What
were the grounds, real or fictitious, upon which this incredulity of
Thomas rested? and how came that incredulity to take such a shape,
and to embody itself in such a declaration ?
Here, I think, by realizing distinctly the actual condition of things,
both as regards the external circumstances which surrounded him,
and the jaundiced eye with which he was disposed to look at them,
we may convince ourselves that the incredulity of Thomas was not
due to any reluctance, on his part, to believe in the resurrection, sim-
ply because of its being a strange, a supernatural occurrence. In
that age, and in that country, this was a form of unbelief altogether
rare, quite unlikely to have been exhibited by Thomas or any fol-
lower of Jesus Christ. A belief in the supernatural was general,
almost universal. To withhold his belief in any occurrence, purely
and solely because it was miraculous, would have made a man about
as conspicuous then, as a belief in all the alleged miracles of ancient
and modern times would make a man conspicuous now. Between
that time and this, the world has undergone an entire revolution in
the state of its general belief, in the form of its practical infidelity,
Besides, even if there had been a large leaven of Sadduceeism work-
ing originally in the mind of Thomas, he had already witnessed, in
his attendance upon Christ, incidents too extraordinary for him to
THE INCKEDULITY OF THOMAS. 813
refuse credence to the resurrection purely and solely on the ground
of its singularity. Neither he, nor any others of the Lord's disci-
ples — unwilling, as they all were at first, to believe that their Master
was indeed alive again; difficult as they all were of conviction on
this point — would have admitted their initial hesitation and incredu-
lity to have proceeded from any such source. It was not the charac-
ter of the event, it was the nature of their precedent faith in, and
their precedent expectations about, their Master and his kingdom,
which generated the difficulty which was felt by them as to believing
in the resurrection. The true fountain of their earlier incredulity lay
within, and not without; in their prejudices in regard to other mat-
ters, not in the nature and circumstances of the resurrection. There
appears to me, therefore, to be a violence done to the historic truth,
to the real state of the case, when Thomas is taken, as he so often is,
as a type or early instance of that unbelief, belonging rather to mod-
ern than to ancient times, which staggers at all miracles, and is indis-
posed to admit anything supernatural.
Thomas' incredulity seems to have outstripped that of all the
other disciples. They would not believe the Galilean women, when
they brought to them the first reports of the resurrection ; but they
had believed when Peter told them that he had seen the Lord, even
before they saw him with their own eyes. But Thomas will not
believe, though to Peter's testimony there is added that of the two
disciples who went out to Emmaus, and that of the whole body of
the disciples to whom Jesus had afterwards appeared. To what is
this excess, this peculiar obstinacy of unbelief on Thomas' part, to be
attributed ? Was he the most prejudiced man among them ; the man
who clung most tenaciously to his earlier ideas and prepossessions,
and would not let them go ? Did those common elements of unbe-
lief, which operated in the breasts of the others as well as in his, yet
work in his with so much greater force as to signalize him in this way,
and keep him standing out in his distrust for so long a time beyond
them ? There was one of those elements which we have some reason
to think did work powerfully on Thomas. It would be quite a mis-
take to conceive of Thomas, because of his abiding incredulity, that
he was a cold, selfish, cautious, unsanguine, naturally misbelieving
man, hard to convince of anything which lay outside the circle of his
own observations, or that did not touch or affect his own interests.
Whatever in origin and nature his skepticism was, it was not the
skepticism of religious indifference, nor did it spring from a predis-
position to doubt. That the spirit of curiosity, of inquiry, was strong
in him, we may perhaps infer from his breaking in upon our Lord's
814 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
discussion in the upper chamber, saying, "Lord, -we know not whith-
er thou goest, and how can we know the way ?" Fuller evidence that
he possessed and knew how to exercise the critical faculty, that he
liked to search and sift the evidence, and get at the real and solid
grounds for believing, will meet us presently ; but we must dismiss
from our minds the idea that he answered in any way to the descrip-
tion which Wordsworth has given us of the man—
" A smooth-rubbed soul, to which could cliug
No form of feeling, great or small ;
A reasoning, self-sufficient thing,
An intellectual all in all."
The only other notice of him in the gospel narrative, besides the one
already alluded to, and that in the passage now before us, forbids us
to entertain any such ideas of Thomas' natural character and dispo-
sition. Escaping out of the hands of his enemies, Jesus had retired
to Bethabara. To him, in his retreat, the sorrowing sisters sent their
message : " Lord, behold, he whom thou lovest is sick." The mes-
sengers were left without an answer. But, after two days of delay
and inaction, Jesus abruptly says to his disciples, without explaining
anything of the object of his visit, ''Let us go into Judea again." It
seemed a fatal resolution; the disciples try to turn their Master from
acting on it. "Master," they say to him, "the Jews of late sought to
stone thee, and goest thou thither again ?" Their Master then tells
of the reason for his going, and of his resolution at all hazards to
carry out his intention. Then, says one of the twelve, if he will go,
go to almost certain deatk, "let us also go, that we may die Avith him."
Had the name not been given, had we not been told which of them
it was who so instantly, so warmly, so generously declared himself
ready to die with his Master rather than desert him, we should have
said that it must have been Peter who spake these words ; but it was
Thomas, to whom much of Peter's ardor appears to have belonged.
Upon such a man, so ardent in his attachment to his Master, we can
readily believe that the blow of the crucifixion came with a peculiarly
stunning force. In proportion to the eagerness of his hopes would
be the blackness of his despair; nor is it wonderful that, sunk into
the depths of that despair, he would at first refuse to believe in the
resurrection. Still, however, attribute what extra force we may to
this one or that other of the ingredients of the unbelief shown by
Thomas in common with his brethren, it seems difficult to understand
the pertinacity of Thomas in standing out so long and so stubbornly
against all attempts of his brethren to convince him. The great bulk
of them had believed before they had seen the Lord. Why should
THE INCREDULITY OF THOMAS. &15
that evidence, which was sufficient to carry their faith, not have car-
ried his ? Yes, but they all at last had seen ; they had seen, and he
had not. In that very distinction do we not get sight of the secret
bias by which the spirit of Thomas was swayed over to an unwilling-
ness to give credence to the resurrection, an incredulity which, in
self-justification, built up those buttresses of self-defence, behind
which it finally entrenched itself, and from which it would not be
dislodged ? The others had seen him, and he had not : why should
he be asked to believe on different evidence from theirs ? He had
been as attached a follower of Jesus as any of them. Why should
he be singled out, and left the only one who had not seen his Mas-
ter ? He did not like, he did not choose to be indebted to others for
the grounds of his believing. He had just as good a right to ocular
proof as they had ; and, in fact, till he got it he would not believe.
The unwillingness that his faith should be ruled by theirs, generated
a disposition to question the soundness of that faith. The evangelist
has given us, only the conclusion to which Thomas came, the result
of the many conferences with his brethren, and to which he for so
many days so resolutely adhered. The very terms in which he em-
bodied this resolution enable us to fill up the blank. Jesus had come
among them, the other disciples would tell Thomas, suddenly, silent-
ly — the door being shut; they had not seen him till he was standing
in the midst. It was very like the mode of a spirit's entrance ; very
unlike the manner in which one clothed with a solid substantial
body would or could appear. They confessed to Thomas, that unless
it were the two disciples who had just come in from Emmaus, all of
them at first believed that it was a spirit, none of them that it was
Christ : that he had himself noticed this, and had corrected their first
and false impression. He had eaten in their presence, he had shown
them the marks in his hands and side ; he had said, "Handle me, and
see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have." Yes,
but had any of them accepted the invitation, had any of them made
such scrutiny of these marks, as to be sure that they were not super-
ficial ? They could not say they had. Strictly interrogated by one
who was anxious to detect any weak point in the evidence, they could
not deny that it was within the limits of the possible that there might
have been a mistake ; that there was a difference, they could not tell
what, between the appearance of their Master as they had seen him
before death, and as they saw him at the evening meeting. Seizing
greedily upon anything which could possibly create a doubt, and
turning it into an instrument of self-justification, Thomas at last de-
clares, "Except I shall not only see in his hands the print of the
816 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
nails, bat shall put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust
my hand into his side, I will not believe." In this we discern no
small amount of ingenious casuistry springing out of wounded piide,
and an exaggerated feeling of self-consequence working in a nature
not less strong in will than ardent in affection.
"I will not believe." 'And is it even thus,' we feel disposed to
make answer, ■ that thy hurt vanity hopes to redeem itself from the
fancied oversight; is it thus that placed, as thou thinkest, below thy
brethren, by not having got the same proof given them, thou thinkest
to set thyself right by putting thyself above them, and declaring that
that proof may have been enough for them, but is not enough for
thee ? What right hast thou to ask a kind or amount of evidence
above that which has satisfied all these thy brethren, and which
would have satisfied any one unbiased by deep precedent prejudice?
What right hast thou to dictate thus to God, and to declare that thou
wilt not believe till the form of proof thou prescribest be afforded ?
Thou wilt not believe ! and if thou dost not, who but thyself will be
the loser ? Hadst thou been in the hands of man, in any other
hands than those of so gracious a Master, thou mightest have waited
long enough ere the proof was given, which in such a spirit wr*s ;
demanded.'
Seven days go past, and the apostles are once more gathered to-
gether on the evening of the second first-day of the week. Thomas
is with them now. What brought him there ? Why, if he thought
them wrong in rejoicing over an event, in the reality of which they
had not sufficient reason to believe, did he join himself to their com-
pany ? Because, I believe, with all his assumed and declared increduli-
ty, he was not in his inmost heart such an utter unbeliever as he would
have others think he was. He had taken up a position which it
behooved him to defend ; but I am much mistaken, if a strong desire,
an expectation, nay, something even of a faith, that it was even as his
brethren had told him, was not working latently, yet strongly in his
breast. We often grievously err in this respect, in our judgment or rep-
resentations of others. If a man is known or said to be a covetous or
an ambitious man, we are too apt to make him all covetousness or all
ambition, and nothing besides. And so, Thomas being obstinately
incredulous, we might imagine him to be utterly so. Not at all likely.
There was room in him, as there is in most men, for very opposite
•wid conflicting states of thought and emotion. We believe, therefore,
that it was in a very mixed state of faith and feeling that Thomas sat
down that evening with the rest. They have not sat long when
again, in the very same way in which he had come before, Jesus
THE INCREDULITY OF THOMAS. 817
enters and stands before them. The general salutation over, and
before another word was spoken, he turns to Thomas and says,
" Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands ; and reach hither
thy hand, and thrust it into my side : and be not faithless, but believ-
ing." How sudden, how unexpected the address! Thomas knew
that lor seven days none of the disciples had seen the Lord ; none of
them could have reported to Him the words that he had used. Yet
now are these very words repeated. It is the omniscient Jesus ; it is
his own well-loved Master who stands before him ! Instant within
him is the rebound from incredulity to faith, to a far higher faith
than that simply in the reality of the resurrection ; of that he has no
doubt. He does not what the Lord desires, and what he himself
desired before. He does not put his finger into the print of the
nails ; he does not thrust his hand into the side. Enough to see that
well-known form ; enough to hear that well-loved voice. That sight,
those words of Jesus, are sufficient to rebuke and to remove his
unbelief. In a moment his doubts all flee ; faith takes their place ;
a faith purified, exalted, strengthened ; a faith in the true divinity as
well as in the true humanity of his risen Lord ; a faith higher, per-
haps, at that moment than that to which any of his brethren around
had attained. Adoring, believing, loving, the fervent, affectionate
Thomas casts himself at his Master's feet, exclaiming, " My Lord and
my God!"
A great advance here, we may well believe, on all Thomas' earlier
conceptions of his Master's character. And may we not believe also
that the bitter experience of the preceding week, the troubled exer-
cises of thought through which he then had passed, the searchings
of those Scriptures which it was reported to him had been quoted
and commented on by Christ himself, had all been secretly preparing
him to take this advancing step ; to believe that the Messiah of an-
cient prophecy was a very different Being in character and office
from what he had before imagined ; much lowlier in some respects,
much higher in others. And now, all at once, the revelation of the
Redeemer's glory bursts upon him as Jesus in person stands before
him ; and not only does all his former incredulity die away, but on
its ruins there rises a faith which springs up all the higher and
sti-onger, because of the pressure by which it had previously been
kept in check. Jesus knew how prepared Thomas was to call him
Lord and God. He then might be asked to do what to Mary was so
emphatically forbidden. " Touch me not," he said to her whose love
to him had too much in it of the earthly, the human — too little of
the spiritual, the divine. " Reach hither thy hand," he said to
LHbofOkrlrt. 52
818 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Thomas. The invitation may be safely given to him who is ready to
own the divinity of his Lord.
The title given him, conveying as it did so distinct and emphatic
a testimony to that divinity, Jesus at once, as if it were his by birth-
right, accepts. But though he refuses not the tendered homage, he
passes no such approving judgment on him who presents it, as he
had formerly done upon Peter when he had made a like confession
of his faith, and Christ had called him blessed. Instead of this,
Christ administers now a mild but effective rebuke : " Thomas, be-
cause thou hast seen me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who
have not seen, and yet have believed." Christ could not mean by
saying so, to declare that he who believes without seeing is more
blessed than he who upon sight believes : for that would exalt the
weakest believer now above the strongest believer of Christ's own
age. The idea that Jesus evidently intended to convey was this, that
of two kinds of faith equally strong, that was to him a more accepta-
ble, and to the possessor a more peace-giving one, which rested on
reasonable testimony in absence of personal observation, than that
which would not yield to this kind of evidence, and demanded that
ocular demonstration should be given. It was, in fact, as addressed
to Thomas, a distinct enough yet delicate intimation, that his faith
had been all the more acceptable to his Master if it had not been
delayed so long. But though this was the primary meaning of the
saying, it is not without its bearings upon those who, like ourselves,
have not seen, and yet are called to believe. The spirit of Thomas
still lives among us. Have we not often detected ourselves, thinking
at least, if not saying, that, had we lived in the days of Jesus Christ,
had we seen what those disciples saw, we would not have doubted as
they did; that, give us but the evidence that they had, and our
doubts would disappear ? We practise thus a strange deception upon
ourselves. We transfer ourselves in fancy to those scenes of the
gospel history, carrying with us all the ideas of our age, forgetting
that very different were the ideas of the men of that generation, who,
though they had the advantage of the sight, had the disadvantage of
the prejudices of their country and their epoch. So equalized in
point of advantage and responsibility do we believe the two periods
to have been, that we may safely affirm, that the men of this genera-
tion who will not believe in the testimony of the original eye-witness-
es, had they been of that generation, would not have believed though
they had been eye-witnesses themselves. He w 7 ho now says, I will
not believe till I see, would not, even seeing, have then believed.
Two closing reflections fire offered. First: Take this case of
THE INCREDULITY OF THOMAS. 819
Thomas, his throwing himself at once at his Master's feet, exclaim-
ing, "My Lord, my God," as a most instructive instance of the exercise
and expression of a true, loving, affectionate, appropriating faith. It
is outgoing, self -forgetting, Christ-engrossed. No raising by Thomas
of any question as to whether one who had been incredulous so long,
would be unwelcome when at last he believed. No occupation of
mind or heart with any personal considerations whatever. Christ is
there before him ; thought to be lost, more than recovered ; his eye
beaming with love, his encouraging invitation given. No doubt about
his willingness to receive, his desire to be trusted. Thomas yields at
once to the power of such a gracious presence, unshackled by any of
those false barriers we so often raise ; the full warm gushing tide of
adoring, embracing, confiding love, goes forth and pours itself out in
the expression, " My Lord, and my God /" Best and most blessed
exercise of the spirit, when the eye in singleness of vision fixes upon
Jesus, and, oblivious of itself, and all about itself, the abashed heart
fills with ad-oration, gratitude, and love, and in the fulness of its emo-
tion casts itself at the feet of Jesus, saying with Thomas, " My Lord,
my God."
Second: Let us take this instance of our Lord's treatment of
Thomas, as a guide and example to us how to treat those who have
doubts and difficulties about the great facts and truths of religion.
There was surely a singular toleration, a singular tenderness, a sin-
gular condescension in the manner of the Saviour's conduct here
towards the doubting, unbelieving apostle. There was much about
those doubts of Thomas affording ground of gravest censure ; the
bad morale of the heart had much to do with them. It was not only
an unreasonable, it was a proud, a presumptuous position he took up,
in dictating the conditions upon which alone he would believe. What
abundant materials for controversy, for condemnation did his case
supply ! Yet not by these does Jesus work upon him, but by love —
by simply showing himself, by stooping even to comply with the con-
ditions so unreasonably and presumptuously prescribed. And if, in
kindred cases — when the spirit of religious incredulity is busy in any
human breast, doing there its unhappy work in blasting the inward
peace — waiving all controversy we could but present the Saviour as he
is, and get the eye to rest upon him, and the heart to take in a right
impression of the depth and the tenderness and the condescension
of his love, might not many a vexed spirit be led to throw itself
down before such a Saviour, saying, " Lord, I believe ; help thou mine
unbelief"?
819a THE LIFE OF CHRIST,
OUTLINE STUDIES.
To the twelve in the upper room at the last supper, also to the
women by one of the angels on the morning of the resurrection, and
again a little later by our Lord himself to the women, the word had
been given that Christ would show himself to his followers in Galilee.
It would appear that Galilee was thus chosen for two of the most
important official disclosures of Christ to his own because it had been
the field of his most fruitful ministry, because there the largest number
of his disciples could be found, and because it offered the quietest
and most secure opportunity for giving his intimate directions to those
who were to carry forward the work of his kingdom.
Probably the eleven apostles went to Galilee not long after the second
Sunday on the evening of which Christ's sixth recorded appearance
had occurred. Four out of the band may have been away from Caper-
naum or Bethsaida visiting friends or relatives, but the others were
together, when Peter, on a sudden impulse so characteristic of him,
says: " I am going to try fishing on the lake once more." The other
six agree to go with him, and they make their arrangements, and with
boat and net begin the trial of their old occupation that very evening.
Beneath the quiet narrative of John's Gospel, it is doubtless implied
that there was latent in their action the suggestion of a return to their
old life, especially should they meet with success. We may well
believe, therefore, that there was a divine purpose and ordering in the
fact that the seven toiled all night along the shores and in the coves
with which they were so familiar and caught nothing!
Marvelously tender and at the same time sublime is the way in
which Christ reveals himself: first by directing them so that they
secured a great netful of fish, and then by receiving and entertaining
the weary, chilled, hungry men about a cheerful fire, with a warm
breakfast.
After this, with searching, considerate words, he restores Peter to
his apostleship, and shows that it will at last involve the laying down
of life even by the path of the cross.
It is perhaps on the Mount of Beatitudes, where the sermon
inaugurating the Kingdom had been delivered and the twelve apostles
had been chosen, that Christ now meets and shows himself to five
hundred of his disciples at once. Here also he now fittingly utters the
great commission and assures his followers that he will be with them
even unto the end of the world.
OUTLINE STUDIES. 8196
PART VI. FORTY DAYS AND THE ASCENSION.
Study 24. Appearances in Galilee.
(1) Christ to meet his disciples in Galilee 820, 821
a. Occasions when this plan was announced 820
b. Special reasons for selecting this region 820
c. To this province the apostles retire when the Passover celebration
is concluded 821
(2) The seven by the shore of Galilee 821-827
a. Peter says, " I go a-fishing " . 821
b. The others say, " We also go with thee 821
c. It seems impulsive, yet is foreseen and divinely overruled 821, 822
d. They toil all night and catch nothing 822
e. A stranger directs them to cast the net on the right side 822, 823
/. A multitude of fishes are enclosed , 823
g. John says, " It is the Lord " 823
h. Peter swims to the shore 823
i. The fish are landed and counted 824
j. Jesus provides the breakfast 824
k. Reflections on the miracle as influencing the apostles 824-827
(3) Jesus' personal words concerning Peter and John 827-836
a. Peter's peculiar position after denial of his Lord 827
b. The question of his repentance and restoration. . 827
c. Jesus' three questions to him 827, 828
d. Peter's replies 828
e. The new commission of Peter. 828
/. Meaning of terms used 828, 829
g. Variety of service in pastoral office \ 829
h. The one qualification — supreme love to Christ 830
i. Closing words for Peter 830, 831
j. Contrasted view of John 832-835
k. Peter and John form a double star 835, 836
(4) Appearance to the five hundred 836-838
a. Christ willed to show himself once and only once to the whole body
of his disciples 836
b. All travel to the appointed place 837
c. The Lord appears 838
(5) The great commission 838-852
a. Christ's claim of all power in heaven and in earth 838
6. The centuries give an affirmative verdict 839
c. Proof that he is the Son of God 839
d. In essence already on the throne 840
e. He thus issues the great commission 839-841
/. He provides the instrument — preaching 842
g. The everlasting gospel of grace , 843-S46
h. The two sacraments and the Church constituted 846, S47
i. Christ's commands form the standard of Christian ethics 847, 848
j. His presence is the motive of Christian service 848 852
820 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
VI.
The Lake-3ide of Galilee.*
Speaking to his disciples in the upper chamber before his death,
Jesus said to them, "After I am risen again, I will go before you into
Galileo." On the morning of the resurrection, the angel said to the
first visitants of the empty sepulchre, "Go your way, tell his disci-
ples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee : there shall ye
see him, as he said unto you." And as they went to execute this
message, Jesus himself met them, and said, "Be not afraid: go tell
my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me."
Pointed so frequently and emphatically to Galilee as to the chosen
district within which their Master was to manifest himself, we might
have anticipated that the apostles would have taken their immediate
departure from Jerusalem. They could not have done so, however,
during the passover week, without being guilty of a great offence
against the religious feeling of their fellow-countrymen. They stayed,
therefore, for these ten days still in the holy city. This delay in pro-
ceeding to Galilee had their Master's sanction not indistinctly put
upon it, by his twice appearing to them collectively, while they yet
lingered in the metropolis. And yet, upon the first of these occa-
sions, on the evening of the day of the resurrection, Jesus said to
them, "Behold, I send the promise of my Father unto you: but
tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem until ye be endued with power from
on high." How are we to explain the contradictory orders upon
which, given in the course of the same day, they were called upon to
act ? Galilee had obviously, for some special reasons, been selected
by Christ as the region in which some special revelations of himself,
after his resurrection, were to be given. Did this spring from a
strong desire to revisit the scenes of his early life, the neighborhoods
in which most of his wonderful works were done ? In solitude and
concealment, shunning everything like frequent or continued inter-
course even with his own disciples, Jesus was to spend forty days on
earth, before his ascension to the Father. Would it have been un-
natural, that he should desire that the larger number of these dayg
should be given to regions hallowed to him by associations such as
human memory had never before been intrusted with? Or was it
that, as Galilee had absorbed the largest share of his earthly labors,
* John 21 : 1-14
THE LAKE-SIDE OF GALILEE. 821
and had yielded to that labor the largest fruits, so it was there that
the largest number of his disciples could be congregated, and that
the quietest and securest opportunity of meeting with them could be
had ? It was there, we know, that he met the five hundred brethren ;
perhaps, it was there only that so many could have been collected,
or, being collected, could have found a secluded and protected meet-
ing-place. Whatever the motives were which prompted the Saviour
to fix beforehand upon Galilee, and to announce it as his chosen
trysting-place for meeting with the brethren at large, one can well
enough see how desirable it was that the apostles should be laid
under the double obligation, first, of going northward to Galilee, that
they might share in the benefit of the most public of all Christ's ap-
pearances after his resurrection ; and, secondly, of returning to Jeru-
salem, as to the place in which the promise of the descent of the
Spirit was to be fulfilled, and they were to be clothed with power
from on high to execute their great mission upon the earth. Nearly
two months were to elapse, ere that baptism of the Spirit was to be
given. It might have been inconvenient or dangerous for them to
have spent so long an interval idly, without occupation or means of
support, in the metropolis. But neither were they to be suffered to
return to their old Galilean haunts without an intimation being made
to them, that it was in Jerusalem that their apostolic work was to
make its auspicious commencement. It is not likely that the apos-
tles saw this at the time as we now see it, as they saw it afterwards
themselves. When they first left Jerusalem, they had perhaps no
small difficulty in harmonizing the apparently conflicting instructions
which had been issued. One thing was very apparent, that their
Master intended to show himself to them in Galilee ; and to Galilee,
therefore, as soon as the passover celebration was over, they retired.
One evening some of them are together by the lake-side. Whether
any of them had ever thought of resuming their old way of living, or
had actually engaged in it, we do not know. All, however, is, this
evening, so inviting ; the lake looks so tempting ; the night, the best
time for the fisher's craft, so promising ; their old boats and nets so
ready to their hand — that one of them, the very one from whom we
should have expected such a proposition to come, in whom the spirit
of his old occupation should be the readiest to revive, Peter says to
them. "I go a fishing." The others say, "We also go with thee. '
It was not a concerted meeting this by the lake-side. The proposal
is evidently on the part of Peter a thought of the moment, and it is
agreed to in the same quick spirit as that in which it is made. The
meeting, the proposal, the acquiescence, all seem fortuitous, accidental
822 THE LIFE OF CHKIST.
Yet was it not all foreseen, all pre-arranged ? An un *een eye follows
these seven men as they embark, and watches them at their fishing
toil ; even the eye of him who was waiting for them in the morning
l>y the shore, by whose hand it was that the whole accidents of that
night and morning were regulated. Even so let ns believe, in regard
to the most casual occurrences which happen still to the disciples of
Jesus, that a providence as special and as gracious as that of which
these seven men were the objects, is in them all, and over them all,
causing them all to work together for their eternal good. Fitfully,
curiously, without art or fixed design of ours, may the web of our
destiny be woven, the threads thrown at random together, no orderly
pattern apparently coming out of their conjunction, and yet, of all
that web there is not a single thread whose place, whose color, whose
motion is not arranged with infinite skill, so as to mould our spiritual
and eternal existence according to its predestined plan. As we recall
and review the past, we may trace up to some trivial origin, some
chance meeting, some accidental conjunction of circumstances, our
present position, our present habits, our present character. As we
do so, we may be disposed to ascribe all to a blind fate ; but let this
scene by the Galilean lake-side, and the many other incidents of a
like kind which the life of our Redeemer supplies, be the living
proofs to us, that " chance also is the daughter of forethought," thai
the minutest details as well as the most momentous incidents of our
earthly history, are all under the constant guidance of our Redeemer.
The disciples toiled all night; it was the time most favorable for
their work. These seven men knew the lake well, every bay of it
where fish were most likely to be taken ; and they were skilled at
this craft. Yet, though they did their best, and toiled all through
the watches of the night, they caught nothing. Two years before,
Peter had once been out all night with as little success, but Peter
had never seen so many practised hands in a single boat toiling so
long and toiling so fruitlessly. Had the remembrance of that other
night of like fruitless labor been suggested to any of the seven ? It
would not seem that it had. The morning breaks upon the quiet
lake, upon the wearied boatmen, and finds them within one hundred
yards or so of the shore. There, upon the beach, a stranger stands;
Btands as any inhabitant of the neighborhood might have stood,
who, having caught sight of the fishing-boat, and knowing how its
occupants must throughout the night have been engaged, wanted to
be one of the first purchasers from them of the fruit of their toil.
One might have thought that the very sight at such an early hour of
a solitary figure upon the shore, would have awakened curiosity in
THE LAKE-SIDE OF GALILEE. 823
the hearts of the disciples, and that, as they had been frequently and
distinctly told, it was here in Galilee they were to see their Master
again, it might have occurred to them that it was Jesus. The
very kind and form of the question put to them, "Children, have ye
any meat ?" — a question which it appears much more clearly from the
original than from our English version, was just the one which any
stranger wishing to become a purchaser of their fish might have
put — may have served rather to allay than to stimulate their curi-
osity. It is certain, at least, that they did not at first recognise him.
Having got an answer to his question; having been told that they
had nothing in the boat, Jesus said to the exhausted and hopeless
fishers of the night, " Cast the net on the right side of the ship, and
ye shall find." They may have wondered for a moment at an order of
that kind being given; they may have thought that the stranger had
seen some indication of the presence of fish in that direction, which
had escaped their eye. They may have had but little faith that the
new cast of their net would be more successful than the many they
had made before. But what the stranger directs can easily be done.
They may try one last throw of their net before they land. They do
so, and noA>' at once they see that not without a reason had the
order been given. Now, they find, that within the small enclosure
which their net makes, such a multitude of fishes is embraced, that
they have difficulty in drawing it through the water towards the
land. And now it is that love proves itself as quick of eye as it had
already shown itself to be swift of foot. When Peter and John ran
out to the sepulchre, John outstripped Peter in the race. He out-
strips him also in the recognition. They are together in the boat; a
strange attraction binds the gentlest to the most forward of the
twelve; and no sooner does it appear that the last cast of the net,
taken in obedience to the command of him who stands upon the
shore, is not only successful, but successful to an extraordinary de-
gree, than the thought flashes into the mind of the beloved disciple
that it must be Jesus. "It is the Lord," whispered John to Peter.
The Lord ! Thomas has taught them the expression ; they begin to
speak of him as the Lord. " It is the Lord," says John, and satisfies
himself with saying so. And now once again the characteristic dif-
ference between the two men reveals itself : John the first to recog-
nize, but Peter the first to act upon the recognition. At once
believing that it is as John has said, Peter, leaving it to the others
so drag the net to shore, flung himself into the water. It was but a
short distance to the shore — about two hundred cubits,, one hundred
yards. He was quickly beside the stranger; although it does not
824 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
appear from the narrative that he gained anything by his greater
forwardness of movement.
It is soor evident that it was not the want of any supply out of
their boat which had led Jesus to put to them the question, "Chil-
dren, have ye any meat?" On landing, the disciples find a fire of coals,
and fish already laid thereon, and bread at hand. Who gathered these
coals? Who kindled that fire? Whence came the fishes and the
bread? Mysteriously provided, the materials for the morning meal
are there, quite independent of any supply which the last draught of
the net may produce. But though all be ready for the weary and hun-
gry fishermen, they must not leave their own proper work unfinished.
As they gather in wonder around that fire to gaze on him who has
furnished this fresh food for them, "Bring," said Jesus to them, "of
the fish which ye have now caught." As if reminded by this order,
of his having failed to take his proper part in the labor of drag-
ging the net to the shore, Peter is now the readiest to act upon this
injunction. It is he who lands the net; and not till the fish taken in
it have been secured and counted, does Jesus say to them, " Come
and dine." He takes the bread and the fish, breaks and divides
them among the seven. Was the miracle of the mountain-side here,
on a smaller scale, again enacted ? Was there only food enough for
one man there at first, and did that food multiply as he blessed
(which we may assume he did) and parted it among them? This
at least, is certain, that he was known now not of Peter and John
alone, but of all the seven, in the breaking of the bread. They all
know it is the Lord; yet none of them durst ask him anything about
himself — a mysterious awe felt in his presence sealing their lips. It
is in silence that this morning meal by the lake-side is partaken of.
This, John says, was the third time that Jesus had showed himself;
not literally the third time that he had showed himself to any one,
but the third time that he had showed himself to the disciples col-
lectively assembled in any considerable number, after he had risen
from the dead.
It had been by a miraculous draught of fishes, like the one now
before us, that, at the outset of his ministry, Christ had drawn away
three at least of the seven now around him from their old occupa-
tions, and taught them to understand that in following him they were
to become fishers of men. Why was that miracle repeated ? Be-
cause the lesson which it conveyed was needed to be again given and
ree'nforced. Had they been told at first to go to Galilee without the
hint of a power to be given from on high, to be bestowed at Jerusa-
lem, they might have returned to their old neighborhoods under the
THE LAKE-SIDE OF GALILEE. 825
impression that they were to abide there permanently. And now
that, bereft of the companionship of Christ, deprived of the means of
support, if not driven by necessity, yet tempted by opportunity, they
resume their ancient calling, was it not needful and kind in Jesus to
interfere, and, by the repetition of that miracle, whose symbolic
meaning they could not fail at once to recognize, to teach them that
their first apostolic calling still held good, that still the command
was upon them, "Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men"?
The two miracles, the one wrought at the beginning, the other at
the close of the Lord's ministry, were substantially the same. Re-
garded as symbols or mute prophecies, they carried the same signifi-
cance. Yet there were differences between them, perhaps indicative
that the one, the earlier miracle, was meant to shadow forth the first
formation; the latter miracle the future and final ingathering of the
church. In the first instance, Christ was himself in the vessel; in
the second, he stood upon the shore. In the first, the order was a
more general one : " Launch out into the deep, and let down your
nets for a draught." In the second, a more specific one : " Cast the
net on the nght side of the ship." In the first, the nets began to
break, and the ship to sink; in the second, nothing of the kind
occurred. In the first, it was a great multitude of fishes that were
enclosed, of all sizes, we may believe, and of all qualities. In the
second, it was a limited number of great fishes which was drawn to
land. It may be a fancy — if so, however, it is one that many have
had fond pleasure in indulging — to see in these diversities, the dis-
tinction between the present and visible effects of the casting forth of
the gospel net upon the sands of time, and that landing and ingath-
ering of the redeemed upon the shores of eternity. Treat this idea
as we may, and great as are the authorities which have adopted it, I
own to the disposition to regard it more as a happy illustration than
a designed symbol — the image is a scriptural one, that both individ-
ually with Christians, or collectively with the church, the present
scene of things is the night of toil, through whose watches, whether
fruitful or not of immediate and apparent good, we have to labor on,
in hope of a coming dawn, when upon the blessed shores we shall
hail the sight of the risen Lord, and share with him in partaking of
the provisions of a glorious immortality.
The night is far spent; that day is at hand. Let our toil then be
one of hope, and our hope one full of immortality. And yet, dark
and often troubled though it be, has not this night of our earthly
sorrow shown us orbs of light we might never have seen by day ?
What should we have known of the Saviour had it not been for oiu
826 THE LITE OF CHRIST.
sin ; what of his power to comfort, but for our present sorrow He
is, indeed, the great light of this dark world of ours. In his incarna-
tion we behold the earthly shining of this light. And what shall we
say of his miracles, that long series of wonders done, of which this
one by the lake side was the closing one, but that they were the
means taken by him for the fuller shining forth of that light wh'ch
lighteth every man who cometh into this world? Of the first miracle
it is said in Scripture, and the saying may be applied to the last as
to the first, to them all throughout — "This beginning of miracles did
Jesus in Cana of Galilee, and manifested forth his glory." His glory
as the Son of the Father stands forth exhibited in these miracles —
there is a simplicity, an ease, a dignity in the very manner of their
performance, which distinguish him from all other wonder-workers.
Moses must plead hard, and struggle long in prayer with God, ere
Miriam is cleansed of her leprosy. Elijah and Elisha must stretch
themselves upon the dead ere life comes back again. Peter must say
to the lame man at the temple gate, "In the name of Jesus Christ of
Nazareth, rise up and walk." These all act as servants in the name
of Another, who permits them upon rare occasions to speak in their
Master's name, and to use their Master's power. But Christ, as a
Son in his own house, speaks in his own name — puts forth his own
power. His language to a leper is, "I will; be thou clean." He
touches the bier, the bearers at the touch stand still : he looks upon
the lifeless body, and saith, " Young man, I say unto thee, arise."
His word of power is heard in the recesses of the rocky sepulchre :
" Lazarus, come forth."
But chiefly the glory, not of power, but of goodness, of love, was
manifested forth in these miracles of Jesus. The miracles of Moses
were miracles of awe and terror; wrought in rivalry of the colossal
powers of ancient heathenism, they were on a scale of amplitude
befitting their design, their chief sphere external nature, the earth,
the rock, the river, the ocean, and the sky. Around the miracles of
Jesus, a milder but richer glory gathers; their chief sphere, the
region of human life, man's sins, man's sorrows, man's maladies,
man's wants. It is divine power acting as the servant of divine love,
which meets to gladden our eye. Nor is it in these miracles alone of
Jesus that this love and power in blended action are to be beheld.
It is not so much as outward evidences of the divinity of his mission,
but still more as exhibitions and illustrations of his divine character,
that we prize and love to study these miracles of our Lord ; and their
chief lesson is lost on us, if we fancy that it was then only when he
was working them, that the divine power and the divine goodness
PETER AND JOHN. 827
that lay in him were acting. That power and love were everywhere
and at all times going forth from him ; and the only true believer in
love and power divine, is he who sees them in every change of na-
ture, in every work of providence, in every ministration of grace, and
who never fancies that it is in the working of miracles alone that the
great hand and power of the Omnipotent are to be beheld. The
miracles are to be regarded by us, not as stray specimens, rare and
exclusive manifestations of that unseen Lord whom we adore, but as
methods merely which he has taken, suited to our ignorance and to
our indifference, to startle us into attention, to make visible to us
that which ever lurks behind unseen, to quicken us to that faith
which, when once rightly formed and exercised, shall teach us to see
God in all things, and all things in God.
VII.
Peter and John.*
The repetition of the miraculous draught of fishes was nothing
slse than a symbolical renewal of the commission given originally to
the apostles, intended to teach them that their first calling to be fish-
ers of men still held good. There was one, however, of the seven for
whose instruction that miracle was intended, whose position towards
that apostolic commission was peculiar. He had taken a very prom-
inent place among the twelve, had often acted as their representative
and spokesman. But on the night of the betrayal he had played a
singularly shameful and inconsistent part. Vehement in his repeated
assertion that though all men should forsake his Master he never
would, though thrice warned, he had thrice over, with superfluous
oaths, denied that he ever knew or had anything to do with Jesus.
How will it stand with Peter, if that apostolic work has to be taken
up again ? Has he sufficiently repented of his sin ? Will he not, in
the depth of that humility and self-distrust which his great fall has
taught him, shrink from placing himself on the same level with the
rest? Does Jesus mean that he should reoccupy the place from
which, by his transgression, he might be regarded as having fallen ?
Singling him out when the morning meal by the lake-side was over,
Jesus said to him, 'Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than
these, thy brethren, my other disciples do?' What a skilful yet del-
* John 21 : 15 23.
828 THE LIFE OF CHBIST.
icate method, without subjecting him to the painful humiliation of
having his former denials of his Master exposed and dwelt upon, of
testing and exhibiting the trueness and deepness of Peter's repent-
ance. Will he repeat the offence; will he again compare himself
with the others; will he again set himself above them; will he renew
that boasting which was the sad precursor of his fall ? How touch-
ingly does his answer show that he perfectly understood the implied
reference to the past; that he had thoroughly learned its humbling
lessons. No longer any comparing himself with, or setting himself
above others. He will not say that he loves Jesus more than they ;
he will not say how much he loves. He will offer no testimony of his
own as to the love he feels. He will trust his deceitful heart no more.
But, throwing himself on another's knowledge of that heart, which
had proved better than his own, he says : " Tea, Lord, thou knowest
that I love thee."
Our Lord's reply is a most emphatic affirmative response to this
appeal. It is as if he had said at large : l Yes, Simon Barjona, I do
know that thou lovest me ; I see too that thou wilt make no boast of
thy love ; neither in that nor in anything else wilt thou set thyself
above thy fellows ; by the pressure of this probe into thy throbbing
heart it has been seen how true and deep thy penitence has been,
how thoroughly it has done its work in humbling thee. And now,
that thou, and these thy brethren, may know and see how readily I
own and acknowledge thee as being to me all thou ever wert, T renew
to thee this great commission ; I reinstate thee in the apostolic office :
"Feed my lambs!"'
Peter was not asked a second time whether he loved more than
others; but as three times he had been warned, and three times he
had denied, so three times will Jesus reinstate, restore. Can we
wonder that Peter was grieved when, for the third time, the general
question, "Lovest thou me," was put to him? It was not the grief of
doubt, as if he suspected that Jesus only half believed his word, but
the grief of contrition, growing into deeper sadness at the so distinct
allusion to his three denials, in the triple repetition of the question.
With a sadder and fuller heart, in stronger words than ever, he
makes the last avowal of his love: "Lord, thou knowest all things,
thou knowest that I love thee."
In the Greek tongue, the language in which this conversation
between Christ and Peter is recorded, two different words are used
for the one translated love, two different words for the one translated
feed, and two different words for the one translated sheep. We may
believe that in that dialect of the Hebrew which was spoken by
PETEB AND JOHN. 829
Christ, from which the Greek was itself a translation, (for we are to
remember that only in one or two instances have the actual words
spoken by Jesus been preserved,) there was some way of making the
same distinction of meaning which is expressed in the different words
for love, and feed, and sheep. It would be quite out of place to go
farther here into such a topic. The result is that Jesus first asks
Peter whether he cherishes to him a love, spiritual, holy, heavenly :
that Peter declines using the term which his Master had employed,
and contents himself with speaking of a kind of affection, simpler,
more personal, more human; that Jesus first commits the feeding of
the lambs to Peter, then the general guidance or oversight of the
whole flock that he had purchased with his blood ; and that finally
he returns to the simple idea of feeding, as applied to this whole flock.
Of more importance is it to notice (as supplying the room for
this variety) the change of image from that of the fisher to that of
the shepherd, as representing the apostolic or ministerial office.
Had it been solely as fishers of men that Peter and his brethren had
been described, as the business of the fisherman is to get the fish into
the net, and draw them safe to land, so it might be thought that the
one office of the spiritual fisherman was to bring sinners to Christ,
to get them safe into his arms. A true, yet contracted idea of the
scope and bearing of the ministerial office might come thus to be
entertained. It is Very different when that office is presented to us
under the idea of a pastorate. A much truer, because ampler con-
ception of its manifold privileges, responsibilities, means, duties,
objects, is thus acquired. Oversight, guidance, care, protection, pro-
vision, these are of the most varied kind, as adapted to all the condi-
tions, exposures, wants, of all the separate members of the flock, and
are all embraced within the function of the shepherd. But let us not
here fashion to ourselves a perfect ideal of what the spiritual shep-
herd is, or ought to be, and then imagine that each under-shepherd
of the great Christian flock is bound, in some degree, to realize, in
his own person and his own work, each separate attribute, each sep-
arate mode or class of activities, which go to constitute the model
that we have constructed. The work of the Christian ministry was,
in the apostolic age, almost wholly evangelistic, aggressive. There
was not the call nor the opportunity then for the exercise of many of
those gifts, which came afterwards to be consecrated to the cause ol
Christ, to the advancement of his kingdom. Yet, even then, there
was no one fixed course, which all apostles, and all presbyters, and
all elders, and all deacons were alike called upon to follow. Had we
ihe lives and labors of all the twelve apostles before us, I am per-
830 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
suaded that we should be as much struck with the diversity, as with
the multiplicity of their operations. Very different, as in a single
instance we shall presently see, were the characters, the disposi-
tions, the capabilities of the twelve men whom the Lord himself
selected as the first propagators of his religion upon earth; and
room was found for all these differences acting themselves out in the
different spheres of labor selected by, or assigned to them. So is it,
so should it be still, in the labor of individual Christians, in the work
of the Christian ministry. God has scattered among us a great
variety of gifts, has set us where a great variety of services may be
rendered. As there are many members in one body, yet all have not
the same office; so neither have all the true members of Christ's
mystical body the same office to discharge. "Let not the hand then
say to the eye, I have no need of thee, nor the head to the foot, I
have no need of thee." Let not those who are engaged in one kind
of Christian work criticise or condemn those who are engaged in
another. Let each of us do the best we can with the kind and
amount of the talent intrusted to us ; let each of us try to do that
which both naturally and immediately comes to our hand, not judg-
ing one another; "for who art thou who judgest another man's ser-
vant ? to his own master he standeth or falleth," but not to thee.
There is, however, one common, universal, indispensable qualifi-
cation for all genuine Christian work — a supreme, a constraining
love to Christ. Once, twice, thrice, is the question, "Lovest thou
me?" put to Peter; and once, twice, thrice, no sooner is an affirma-
tive reply given than the injunction follows: 'If thou lovest me, as
thou lovest me, then feed my lambs, feed my sheep.' And the first,
the second, the third pre-requisite for all true feeding of the lambs,
the sheep of the Saviour's flock, is attachment to himself — a love to
Jesus Christ running over upon all who, however weakly, do yet
believe in him. The want of that love, nothing can supply: not
mere natural benevolence — that may lead its possessor to do much
to promote the happiness of others, may win for him their gratitude
and good- will, but will not teach him to labor directly and supremely
for their spiritual, their eternal good ; not the mere sense of duty —
that may secure diligence and faithfulness, but will leave the work
done, under its exclusive promptings, sapless and dry— the element
not there of a warm and tender sympathy, that best instrument of
power. It is love-inspired, love-animated labor, which Jesus asks
for at our hands. That we may be able, in any degree, to realize it,
let it be our first desire and effort to quicken within our souls a love
to him who first, and so wonderfully, loved us ; the flickering and
PETER AND JOHN. 831
languid flame in us, let us carry it anew, day by day, to the undying
fire that burns in the bosom of our Redeemer, to have fresh fuel
heaped upon it, to be rekindled, refreshed, sustained, expanded. To
know and believe in the love that Christ has to us, to feel ourselvei
individually the objects of that love, to open our hearts to all the
hallowed influences which a realizing sense of that love is fitted to
exert — this is the way to have our spirits stirred to that responsive
affection to him, which gives to all Christian service purity and power.
''Simon, Simon," our Lord had said to Peter before his fall,
" Satan hath desired to sift thee as wheat, but I have prayed for thee
that thy faith fail not ; and when thou art converted " — converted,
Jesus means here not in the ordinary sense of the term, but recov-
ered, restored — -"then strengthen thy brethren." That strengthen-
ing of the brethren formed part of the shepherd's office, now anew
committed to Peter; and what a lesson had he got in the treatment
which he had himself received at the hands of the Chief Shepherd,
as to how that office should be discharged ! The prayers, the warn-
ings, the look of love, the angel's message, the private interview, this
conversation by the lake-side — these all told Peter of the thought-
fulness, the care, the kindness, the pitying sympathy, the forgiving
love, of which he had been the object. Thus had he been treated
by Jesus ; and let him go and deal with others as Christ had dealt
with him.
So far in what Christ had spoken, while there was much that was
personal and peculiar to Peter, there was much also that had a
wider bearing. But now the Lord has a word, which is for Peter's
ear alone. "Whither I go," (he had said to him in the upper cham-
ber,) "thou canst not follow me now, but thou shalt follow me after-
wards;" and Peter had said in reply, "Lord, why cannot I follow
thee now ? I am ready to go with thee to prison, and to death ; I
will lay down my life for thy sake." These words of the apostle,
though sadly falsified the night when they were spoken, still were to
hold good. Peter did follow his Master, even unto death. He did
lay down his life for Jesus' sake; crucified, as his Lord had been.
Knowing this, and knowing that he needed all the encouragement
which could be given him, to fortify him to meet the martyr's doom,
not only will Jesus in that private interview in the resurrection-day
wipe all his tears away, and now in presence of his brethren reinstate
him in his apostolic office, but he will do for him what he does for
no other of the twelve — he will reveal the future so far as to let him
know by what kind of death it should be that he should glorify
God — to let him know that the opportunity would 1>o at last afforded
THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
him of making good the words which he too hastily and boastfully
had spoken. " Verily, verily, I say unto thee, when thou wast young
thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest ; but when
thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another
shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not." The
explanatory clause which is introduced here, creates the impression
that there had been a break or an interruption of the discourse.
From verse twentieth, it would appear too, that Jesus had made
some movement of withdrawal. These two circumstances combine in
inducing the idea, that when our Lord said to Peter, "follow me,"
he meant simply that he should go along with him as he now retired.
If, however, the words of the nineteenth verse were spoken in imme-
diate connection with, and in continuation of what is recorded in the
eighteenth, then, in saying "follow me," our Lord might have had in
his eye the very words of Peter about following him to prison and to
death, and have meant, in using them, to say, 'When thou shalt be
old, and another shall seize upon thee and bind thee as they seized
and bound thy Master in preparation for his crucifixion, then Peter,
follow me, through the Cross to glory.'
It is very difficult, owing to the briefness of the gospel narrative,
to picture to our eye the scene which followed. Did Jesus, as he
said "follow me," arise to depart, and was Peter in the act of follow-
ing when he turned and saw John following also ? Did John mis-
take so far the meaning of Christ's word and act, as to consider him-
self equally with Peter called upon to follow? or was it of his own
motion, and without any real or imagined invitation that he was act-
ing? However it was, Peter, his mind full of the many thoughts
that this pre-intimation of his death had excited, turns and sees
John by his side. His own fate had been foretold ; what, he won-
dered, would be John's ? The beloved disciple had once, at his sug-
gestion, put a question to their Master about the others; now he will
put a question about John — a question of natural and of brotherly
curiosity, yet somewhat out of place. He has resumed too rapidly
his old position, and his old hasty and forward ways. Jesus will
not become a fortune-teller, to gratify even a friendly inquisitive-
ness. He puts a check upon the unbefitting inquiry, and yet, sin-
gularly enough, even in rebuking, he answers it. ' " If I will that he
tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me." Each
man's path, as each man's duty, is separate and distinct. "What
the lot of another man may be, has nothing to do with the regula-
tion of thine individual course. What is it to thee, Peter, whether
John's destiny shall be the same or different from thine ? The thing
PETER AND JOHN. 838
for thee to do is not to turn aside to busy thyself with his hereafter,
but to occupy thyself with the duty that lies immediately before thee
to discharge. What is that to thee? follow thou me.' But "if I will
that he tarry till I come :" Only imagine that Jesus was other than
divine, and how arrogant the assumption here of his will regulating
human destinies, fixing the time and the manner of his disciples'
death; Deity incarnate alone was entitled to use such language: "If
I will that he tarry till I come." When John wrote his gospel, that
saying of Jesus was not understood. Some regarded it as implying
that John should never die. The beloved disciple himself saw only
so far into its meaning, that it contained no direct assertion of that
kind, but farther he did not then see. Perhaps afterwards, when he
saw all the apostles die out before, and witnessed, as he only did,
the destruction of Jerusalem, of which Christ had often spoken as
identified with his coming — perhaps at that time, forty years after
the meeting by the lake-side, he remembered the words that his
Master had spoken, and wondered as he perceived how remarkably
they were fulfilled.
Next to the absence of all notice of our Lord's mother, few things
are more remarkable, in the narrative of the period after the resur-
rection, than the silence respecting John. One of the earliest visit-
ants at the sepulchre, present at both the evening interviews at Jeru-
salem, the disciple whom Jesus loved is neither spoken of nor spoken
to. This is the only case in which he meets our eye, and he appears
here rather in conjunction with Peter than with Jesus. In the ac-
count of our Lord's ministry, though John was frequently associated
svith Peter, it was as one of the two sons of Zebedee, the tie to his
brother James being then obviously a stronger one than that to Peter.
But from the hour when the two entered together the hall of the
high priest, a singular attraction appears to have drawn these two
men together. The brotherly tie yields to one which has become
still stronger, and instead of its being Peter and James and John, it
is now Peter and John who are seen constantly in company with one
another. This is all the more singular, when one considers how
unlike the two were in natural character, in original disposition.
John was born a lover of repose, of retirement. Left to himself,
he would never have been an adventurous or ambitious man. Even
in his very motion there had been rest. Had he never seen the Sav-
iour, he would have remained quite contented in the occupation to
which he had been brought up. To sit upon the sunny banks of thai
lovely inland lake mending his nets, his eye straying occasional!/
across its placid waters, or lifted to the blue expanse above; to take
Ufe of Christ. 58
834 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
his accustomed seat in his fishing-boat, to launch out by night under
these burning heavens, and sweep over the well-known haunts, would
have been enough for him ; he neither would have desired nor sought
for change. It may seem to militate against this idea of John's char-
acter that he and his brother were called Boanerges, the sons of
thunder. We are not told, however, the reason why this title was
bestowed on them ; it may have been derived from something pecu-
liar in the father rather than in the sons. Nor can we allow the
bestowal of an unexplained and ambiguous epithet to outweigh the
whole drift and bearing of the gospel narrative, which speaks so
much of the meekness and modesty and gentleness and retiringness
of John. But let us not confound John's yielding gentleness with
that spirit of easy compliance which shuns all contest, because it
does not feel that there is anything worth contending for. Beneath
John's calm and soft exterior there lay a hidden strength. In the
mean, vulgar strife of petty, earthly passions, John might have yield-
ed when Peter would have stood firm. But in more exciting scenes,
under more formidable tests, John would have stood firm when Peter
might have yielded. This was proved on the night of the arrest and
the day of the crucifixion. And there was latent heat as well as
latent strength in John. As lightning lurks amid the warm, soft
drops of the summer shower, so the force of a love-kindled zeal
lurked in his gentle spirit. The Samaritans might a thousand times
have refused to receive himself into their dwellings, and it had stirred
no resentment in his breast ; but when they contemptuously refused
to receive the Master to whom he was so ardently attached, it was
more than he could endure. He joined his brother James in saying,
"Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven,
and consume them ?" — a solitary outbreak of a sentiment but seldom
felt, or if felt, habitually restrained; yet that single flash reveals an
inner region where all kinds of vivid emotions lived and moved and
had their being.
Nor let us confound John's simplicity with shallowness. If it be
the pure in heart who see God, John's was the eye to see farther into
the highest of all regions than that of any of his fellows. If it be he
that loveth who knoweth God — for God is love — John's knowledge of
God must have stood unrivalled. We reckon his as belonging to the
highest order of intellect ; not analytical nor constructive ; the logical
faculty, the reasoning powers, not largely developed; but his the
quick bright eye of intuition, which, at a glance, sees farther into the
heart of truth than by the stepping-stones of mere argumentation you
can ever be conveyed. There were besides under that calm surface
PETER AND JOHN. 835
which the spirit of the beloved disciple displayed to the common eye
of observation, profound and glorious depths. The writer of the
gospel and epistle is, let us remember, the writer also of the Apoca-
lypse ; and if the Holy Spirit chose the vehicle best fitted for receiv-
ing and transmitting the divine communications, then to John we
!nust assign not the pure deep love alone of a gentle heart, but the
vision and the faculty divine, the high imaginative power.
Peter, again, was born with the strongest constitutional tendency
to a restless and excited activity. He could not have endured a life
of monotonous repose. He was a child of impulse ; he would have
been a lover of adventure. He was not selfish enough to be a covet-
ous, nor had he steadiness enough to be a successfully ambitious
man ; but we can conceive of him as intensely excited for the time
by any distinction or any honor placed within his reach. Had he
never seen the Lord, one cannot think of him as remaining all his
life a fisherman of Galilee ; or, if the natural restraints of his position
kept him there, even in that fisherman's life he would have found the
means of gratifying his constitutional biases. Eager, ardent, san-
guine, it needed but a spark to fall upon the inflammable material,
and his whole soul kindled into a blaze, ready to burst along what-
ever path lay open at the time for its passage. The great natural
defect in Peter was the want of steadiness, of a ruling, regulating
principle to keep him moving along one line. Left to work at ran-
dom, the excitability of such a susceptible spirit involved its pos-
sessor often in inconsistency, exposed him often to peril. We have,
however, had this apostle so often before us, that we need not say
more of him. Enough has been said to bring out to your eye the
strong contrast in natural character and disposition between him and
John. Yet these were the two of all the twelve who finally drew
closest together. The day of Pentecost wrought a great change upon
them both, and by doing so linked them in still closer bonds. The
grace was given them which enabled each to struggle successfully
with his own original defects, and to find in the other that which he
most wanted. It is truly singular, in reading the earlier chapters of
the Acts of the Apostles, to notice how close the coalition between
Peter and John became. Peter and John go up together to the tem-
ple. It is upon Peter and John that the lame man at the gate fixes
his eye. After he was healed, it is said that he held Peter and John
as if they were inseparable. It was when the}- saw the boldness of
Peter and John that the members of the Sanhedrim marvelled.
And when they commanded them to speak no more in the name of
Jesus, it is said that "Peter and John answered and said," as if in
836 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
very voice as well as in action they were one. Acts 3:1, 3, 11
4:13,19.
Blessed fruit this of that all-conquering grace of God, which lifts
Peter above the fear of reproach, and John above the love of ease ;
which brings the most timid and retiring of the twelve to the side of
the most stirring, the most impetuous ; supplying a stimulus to the
one — a regulator to the other; bringing them into a union so near,
and to both so beneficial — John's gentleness leaning upon Peter's
strength; Peter's fervid zeal chastened by John's pure, calm love.
In the glorious company of the apostles, they shone together as a
double star, in whose complemental light, love and zeal, labor and
rest, action and contemplation, the working servant and the waiting
virgin, are brought into beauteous harmony.
VIII.
The Great Commission.*
The very fact that among those who saw Christ upon the moun-
tain side of Galilee there were some who doubted, convinces us that
more than the eleven must have been present at the interview. For
after his repeated appearances to them in Jerusalem, after his meet-
ing with them, and eating with them, and showing them his hands
and his side, and asking them to handle him — that any of the eleven
should at this after stage have doubted, is scarcely credible. And
our impression of the incredibility of this is deepened by reflecting
that it was to a place of his own appointment they now went, and
that for the very purpose of seeing and conversing with him once
more. There are other and still weightier reasons, which leave no
ground for doubt, that the appearance of the risen Saviour recorded
by St. Matthew — the only one which this evangelist does record, and
to which we may therefore conclude that a peculiar importance
attached — was the same with that to which St. Paul refers, when he
says: "After that he was seen of five hundred brethren at once, of
whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen
asleep."
It was the will of Christ to show himself alone after his resurrec-
tion, once, and once only, to the whole collective body of his disci-
ples; to as many, at least, as could conveniently be coogregated at
* Matt. 28 : 16-20.
THE GREAT COMMISSION. 837
one time, and in one place. It was in Galilee that this purpose could
best be accomplished. There, and there only, could so many as five
hundred of his disciples be found, and brought safely together.
After the ascension, when all assembled at Jerusalem that the city
and its neighborhood could supply, the number of them gathered
there was only one hundred and twenty. Hence, perhaps, one rea-
son why, on the night before his death, and on the morning of his
resurrection, the apostles were so repeatedly and emphatically told
by Christ himself, and through the commissioned angel, that he went
before them into Galilee, and it was to be there that they were to
see him. Their attention was thus fixed beforehand upon an inter-
view at which the most public and impressive manifestation of their
risen Lord was to be made.
The necessity of the case required that both time and place should
be named beforehand, fixed by our Lord himself, by him communi-
cated to the apostles, by them announced to others; the tidings con-
veyed abroad over Galilee, wherever disciples of Jesus were to be
found. One can imagine what intense curiosity, what longing desire
to be present at such an interview, would be kindled wherever the
intelligence was carried. In due time the day appointed dawns. On
towards the indicated mountain-side, group after group is eagerly
pressing ; the solitary one from some far-off hamlet, the one of his
family that has been taken while the others were left, mingling with
the larger companies that Capernaum and Bethsaida send forth. All
are gathered now. From knot to knot of old Galilean friends the
apostles pass, assuring them that this is indeed the day and the
place the Lord himself had named; and giving a still quicker edge to
the already keen enough curiosity, by telling of the strange things
they had so lately seen and heard at Jerusalem.
What new thoughts about the Crucified would be stirring then in
many a breast ! A prophet, all of them had taken him to be ; but if
all be true that they now are hearing, he must be more than a proph-
et ; for which one of all their prophets ever burst the barriers of the
grave? The Messiah, many of them had taken him to be; but now,
if they are to retain that faith, their former notions of who and what
the Messiah was to be, must be greatly changed. A Messiah reach*
ing his throne through suffering and death, is an idea quite new to
them. They ask about his late appearances, and are lost in wonder
as they hear how few they have been, how short ; at what a distance,
eren from the eleven, the risen Jesus had kept; what a studied
reserve there had been in his intercourse with them, so different from
his old familiarity. He is, he must be, a Being other, far higher,
838 THE LIFE OF CHEIST.
than they had fancied him to be. Is it really true what they had
heard himself say, but had not fully understood, that he was the Sou
of, the equal of the Father — God incarnate ? Thomas tells them
that he fully believes so. The other apostles tell them that he has
opened their minds through a new interpretation of the prophecies
to quite different notions about himself and his kingdom from any-
thing they had hitherto entertained. In what a very singular condi-
tion of thought and feeling, as they try to realize it, must that com-
pany of five hundred brethren have been, which collected on the
mountain-side, and stood awaiting Christ's coming ?
At last the Lord appears: we know not how; whether bursting
at once on their astonished vision, without shadow of approaching
form or sound of advancing footstep, seen standing in the midst ; or
whether seen at first far off, alone in the distance, silently watched,
as treading the mountain-side he drew nearer and nearer to them,
till at last he was by their side. However he came, when they saw
him, we are told they worshipped : with clasped hands, or on bended
knee ; some, like Thomas, with profound and intelligent adoration ;
others with a worship heightened by wonder, somewhat vague,
but pure as the mountain air they breathed. But some doubted—
those who saw him now for the first time after his resurrection. Here,
as in almost every first interview of the kind, there was a doubt, one
speedily dispelled, whose natural source we have already attempted
to indicate.
" And Jesus came and spake to them, saying, All power is given
to me in heaven and in earth." To whatever height of conception
and belief the men of that company may have been rising, upon
whose ears these words fell, as Christ's greeting to them in the first,
the only interview they were to have with him after his resurrection,
we may be assured that they went much beyond what they ever ex-
pected to hear coming from those lips. Already they had worship-
ped, gazing in wonder on him, as one who had come to them from
the dead. But what fresh subject for wonder now ; what higher rea-
son for worship now ! Power they knew him to possess ; power over
earth, and air, and water ; power over the spirits of all flesh ; power
even over the powers of darkness. Power enough they had attrib-
uted to him to set up an earthly kingdom in front of all opposition,
to crush all his enemies under his feet. Such power they were pro-
pared to hear him claim, and see him exercise. But they were not
prepared to hear him say, " All power is given to me in heaven and
in earth." Far above all their former thoughts of him does Jesus
thus ascend, and, by ascending, try to lead them up. It has been
THE GREAT COMMISSION. 839
already suggested, that one part of Christ's design in dwelling for
these forty days on earth, and in the mode of conduct to his disciples
which he pursued, was gradually to lift their minds from lower and
unworthier thoughts of him to a true conception of his divine dignity
and power ; and it confirms our belief in this to find that in the great-
est, the most public, the most solemn manifestation of himself which
Christ at that time made, his first declaration to the assembled
five hundred was, "All power is given to me in heaven and in
earth ! "
When first uttered, how many eyes were fixed in wonder upon the
man who spake these words ! Eighteen hundred years have gone
past since then; millions upon millions of the human family have
had these words repeated to them, as spoken by the Son of Mary;
have regarded them as honestly and truly spoken ; as expressing but
a simple fact. How could this have been ? How could a man of
woman born, who had lived and died as we do, have been regarded
as other than the vainest, most arrogant of pretenders, who said that
all power in heaven and in earth was his, had there not been some-
thing in the whole earthly history of this man which corresponded
with and bore out such an extraordinary assumption ? And even
such were the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth. They have now
been for centuries before the world, as the life and death of one who
claimed to be the eternal Son of God, the equal of the Father; of one
who said that as the Father knew him, so knew he the Father; of
one who said that whatsoever things the Father did, the same did
the Son likewise ; that the Father had delivered all things into his
hand ; that all power was his in heaven and in earth. And no one
has ever been able to show anything in the character, the sayings, the
doings of Jesus Christ, inconsistent with such extraordinary preten-
sions ; all is in harmony with the claim, all goes to sanction and sus-
tain it. It seems to us that the simple fact that there was a Man
who lived for three-and-thirty years in familiar intercourse with his
fellow-men, who yet, before he left this world, was recognized and
worshipped by five hundred of his fellow-men as one who was guilty
of no presumption in saying, " All power is given me in heaven and
in earth;" and who, since that time, has been believed in by such
multitudes as the God incarnate, goes far, of itself, to sustain the be-
lief that he was indeed the Son of the Highest, and that it was nc
robbery with him to count himself equal with God ; for, only imagine
that he was no more than he seemed to be, a Jew, the son of a Gali-
lean carpenter, educated in a village in the rudest part of Judea —
that such a man, being a man and no more, could have lived so long
840 THE LIFE OF CHE1ST.
upon the earth without saying or doing anything which could belie
the idea that in him dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, ap-
pears to us to present far greater difficulties to faith than does the
doctrine of the Incarnation.
It is not so much, however, as one possessed of it by original and
Dative right, that Jesus lays claim here to supreme and unlimited
power. He speaks of the "all power in heaven and in earth" as
"given" — given by another ; by Him whose law he had so magnified,
whose character he had so glorified in his life and by his death. It
was as the fruit and reward of his obedience unto death that he was
invested by the Father with unlimited authority and power. One of
the conditions of the everlasting Covenant was that, crucified in
weakness, Christ should be raised in power ; that, on account of his
having suffered unto death, he should be crowned with glory and
honor. And his first word to this company on the mountain-side is
the first announcement from his own lips, that, his great decease hav-
ing been accomplished, this condition of the covenant had been ful-
filled ; that he had entered upon possession of the mediatorial sove-
reignty. Constituted heir of all things, the great inheritance had to
be acquired, the kingdom won. The heir still lingers for a season
upon earth, but he is on his way to the throne on which he is to sit
down, covered with glory and honor, angels and principalities and
powers being made subject to him. Jesus indeed speaks here as if
he were already upon that throne. As in the upper chamber, when
the agony of the garden and the sufferings of the cross still lay before
him, he spake as if the passion were over, as if heaven had been
already entered, saying, "I have glorified thee on the earth, I have
finished the work which thou gavest me to do. Father, I will that
those whom thou hast given me be with me where I am;" so here,
on the mountain-side, he speaks as if the cloud had already carried
him away — as if his feet were already standing within the throne of
universal sovereignty — as if, having raised him by his mighty power
from the dead, the Father had already set him on his own right hand
in the heavenly places, far above all principality and power, and
might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this
world, but also in that which is to come ; had put all things under
his feet, and given him to be Head over all to the church, which is
his body, the fulness of him that filleth all in all.
It is from the lofty elevation thus attained, it is as clothed with
the supreme, limitless authority and power thus acquired, that Jesus
issues the great commission to the church, Go ye therefore and teach or
make disciples of all nations ; or as you have it in another evangelist,
THE GREAT COMMISSION. 841
Go, preach the gospel to every creature. A mission so comprehen-
sive was as novel as it was sublime. Familiarity with the idea blunts
the edge of our wonder, but let us recollect that at the time when, m
a remote Jewish province, gathering a few hundred followers around
him, Jesus sent them forth, assigning to them a task which should
not be accomplished till every creature had heard the glad tidings of
salvation in his name, and all nations had been brought to sit under
his shadow — that at that time the very idea of a religion equally ad-
dressed to, and equally adapted to all nations, equally needed by, and
equally suited to every child of Adam, was wholly new, had never
been broached, never been attempted to be realized. There was no
form or system of idolatry that ever aimed at, or was indeed capable
of such universality of embrace. The object of its worship was either
confined to certain definite localities ; the gods of certain mountains,
groves, or streams, whose worship was incapable of transfer; or they
were the offspring and expression of some peculiar state of society,
whether savage or civilized, suited only to that particular state or
condition of humanity in which they had their birth and being. It
is true that in all the more educated nations of antiquity, there were
men who soared far above the vulgar prejudices and superstitions of
their times, whose religion, such as it was, had certainly nothing
about it of that confinement by which the popular belief and wor-
ship were characterized, but if free thus from one kind of confine-
ment, their religion was all the more liable to another. Unfitted for
the many, it was by eminence the religion of the few. Its disciples
gloried in its exclusiveness. It would have lost half its charm in their
eyes, had the people at large adopted it. But there was no danger
of that. It was essentially unfitted for the multitude. Its votaries
would have laughed at the idea of trying to convert even a single
tillage to their faith. Such, in the days of Jesus Christ, in all
heathen countries, were the multiform idolatries of the many, the ex-
clusive faith of the few. In Judea, it was somewhat different. Sa-
cred books were circulating there, in which, under dark prophetic
symbols, hints were given of a future gathering of all the nations
under one great king and head. But these hints were universally
misunderstood and misapplied. Amid all the confined and exclusive
religions of that period, there was not one more confined, or more
exclusive, than Judaism. Both socially and religiousb the Jew of
ihe Saviour's time was one of the most shut up and bigoted of the
race. Everything about him — his dress, his food, his domestic cus-
toms, nis religious ceremonies — marked him off by a broad wall ol
separation from the rest of the species. He gloried in this distinc-
842 THE LIFE OF OHPwIST.
fcion. He thought and spoke of himself and his brethren as the elect
of God, the holy, the clean : the Gentiles were the dogs, the polluted,
the unclean. His attachment to his religion, as a faith proclaimed
exclusively to his forefathers, and bequeathed by them as a national
heritage to their children, was intense. His faith and his patriotism
were one, and the deeper the patriotism the narrower the faith. And
jet it is among this people ; it is from one who was brought up in
one of its wildest districts ; it is from one for whom birth, position,
education, had done nothing in the way of weaning him from the
common prejudices of his countrymen, making him in that respect
different from any other Jew ; it is from one who, save occasional
visits to Jerusalem, never moved beyond the neighborhood of a Gali-
lean village, nor shared in the benefits of any other society than it
supplied; it is from him that a religion emanates whose professed
object is to gather into one, within its all-embracing arms, the whole
human family. The very broaching of a project so original, so com-
prehensive, so sublime, at that time and in those circumstances,
staods out as an event unique in the history of our race. In vain
shall we try to explain it on the supposition that it was the self- sug-
gested scheme of the son of a Galilean tradesman. The very time
and manner of its earthly birth claims for it a heavenly origin. Had
Jesus Christ done nothing more than this — set the idea for the first
time afloat, that it was desirable and practicable to frame for the
world a religious faith and worship which should have nothing of the
confinements of country, or period, or caste, but be alike adapted to
all countries, all periods, all kinds and classes of men — he would have
stood by himself and above all others.
But he did more than this. He not only announced the project,
but he devised the instrument by which it was to be accomplished;
he put that instrument in its complete and perfect form into the
hands of those by whom it was to be employed. Study the history
of all other revolutions, civil or religious, which have taken place
upon this earth, and you will find it to be true of all of them, that the
methods by which they were wrought out were at first devised by
different men and at lengthened intervals, and afterwards perfected
by slow degrees. The men engaged in effecting them had to feel
their way forward ; had often to retrace their steps; had often to cast
aside an old instrument because it was found to be useless, or be-
cause a new and better one had been fallen upon in its stead. It has
not been so with the establishment and propagation upon the earth
of the religion of Jesus Christ. The instrumentality employed here
has been the same from the beginning. It has never asked for, be-
THE GEEAT COMMISSION. 843
cause it never needed> improvement or change. We have it now in
our hands in the same form in which it was put by Christ himself
into the hands of the first disciples of the faith. The experience of
bo many centuries has detected no flaw, revealed no weakness, pro-
vided no substitute. When Jesus said, Go, make disciples of all na-
tions, he announced — and that in the simplest, least ostentations
way, as if there were no novelty in the project, no difficulty in its
execution, as if it were the most natural thing in the world that it
should be taken up, as if it were the surest thing that it could be car-
ried out — he announced the most original, the broadest, the sublimest
enterprise that ever human hands have been called upon to accom-
plish. And when he said, Go, preach the gospel to every creature,
he supplied, in its complete and perfect form, the instrument by
which it was to be realized. And that simple gospel of the grace of
God preached, proclaimed, made known among all nations, to every
creature, has it not proved itself fitted for the work? No nation can
claim this gospel as peculiarly its own. No class or kind of human
beings can appropriate it to themselves. It speaks with the same
voice, it addresses the same message to the wandering savage and to
the civilized citizen, to the most abandoned reprobate and to the most
correct and fastidious moralist. Its immediate and direct appeal is
to the naked human conscience, to man as a sinner before his Maker.
Wholly overlooking and ignoring all other distinctions of character
and condition, it regards us all as on the common level of condemna-
tion, under the sentence of that la w which is holy and just and good.
To each of us, as righteously condemned, it offers a free, full pardon
through the death, an immediate and entire acceptance through the
merits and mediation, of Jesus Christ. It presents the means and
influences by which a holy character and life may be attained on
earth, and it opens up the way to a blissful immortality hereafter.
If, looking simply at the outward means employed, we were asked
wherein lay the secret of the immediate and immense power which
the Christian religion at first exerted upon such multitudes of men,
we should say that it was in the call it carried with it to every man,
just as it found him, to repent, and repenting, enter into immediate
peace with his Maker through Jesus Christ ; in the assurance that it
gave of God's perfect good-will to him, His perfect readiness to for-
give and accept; the proclamation which it made that, by Christ'g
death, every let or hinderance had been removed, and that every sin-
ful child of Adam was invited to enter into that rest which Christ had
provided for all who came to him. Only think, when these tidings
were new, and when they were at once heartily and cordially believed
344 THE LIFE OF OHBIST.
in, what a wonderful revolution in man's inner being they were fitted
to effect ! Can you wonder when, to a world grown weary of its fol-
lies, its idolatries, its philosophies, its gropings in the dark, its strug-
gles to find the truth, its passionate desire to know something of that
world beyond the grave, for the first time it was told that God was
not a God afar off but very near at hand, for he had sent his own Son
into the world to make such a revelation of him that it could be said
that whosoever had seen him had seen the Father also ; it was told
that a life beyond the grave was no longer a matter of speculation,
for Christ, the Son of the Eternal, had risen as the first-fruits of a
coming general resurrection of the dead ; it was told that access to
God and to God's full favor was no longer a thing of doubt and time
and difficulty, to be reached, if reached at all, through prayer and
priests, and services and sacrifices, for a new and direct and open
way had been revealed by God himself, through which any one might
step at once into his gracious presence, into the full light of his rec-
onciled countenance ; it was told that the forgiveness of all his past
sin was no longer a matter about which, to the last moment of his
life, a man was to be kept hanging between hope and fear, for through
this man Christ Jesus there was offered to all who would accept it
an instant remission of all their sins; it was told that poor, weak,
tempted, erring, sinful, suffering man had no longer to regard himself
as an alien, an exile from the world of the pure and the blessed,
frowned on by the beings or powers he worshipped, his whole life
turned into a struggle by one or other kind of propitiatory offerings
to keep on something like good terms with his conscience and his
God, for there was One who had loved and suffered and died to save
him ; a man like himself, and yet a God ; a man to pity, a God to
protect; a man to sympathize, a God to succor; whose presence,
companionship, friendship, were waiting to cheer his path in lif e, and
illumine for him the dark valley of the shadow of death ; can yon
wonder that when, in all its simplicity and in all its fulness of comfort
and consolation, the gospel of the grace of God was first proclaimed
to sinful men, it was hailed by thousands as indeed glad tidings from
the far country ? Or, looking at the Scripture records, can you won-
der that the three thousand who were converted on the day of Pen-
tecost, as they broke bread from house to house did eat their meat
with such gladness and singleness of heart, praising God ? Can yon
wonder, when with one accord the people of Samaria gave heed to
the things spoken by Philip, preaching peace by Jesus Christ, that
there was great joy m that city ? Can you wonder, when the Ethn>
pian treasurer had his eyes opened to see who it was who had been
THE GKEAT COMMISSION. 845
wounded for his transgressions and bruised for his iniquities, and
found in Jesus the very Saviour that he needed, that he went on his
way rejoicing ? Can you wonder, when at Antioch and elsewhere the
Gentiles heard for the first time all the words of this life, that "they
were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord"? Many and great
indeed were the hinderances which arose : slow often and difficult the
progress that was made. But the way in which these hinderances
generally acted, was to cloud with some obscurity the simple tidings
of the love of God in Christ to sinful men ; to close the door that his
grace had opened ; to fetter with this condition or with that, the full
reconciliation with our Maker into which we are all invited at once
to enter ; more or less, in fact, to assimilate the religion of Jesus to
all the other religions which have represented God's favor as a thing
to be toiled for through life, and to be won, if won at all, only at its
close — the life itself to be passed in a sustained uncertainty as to
whether it would be got at last or not — whereas it is the distinction
and the glory and the power of the gospel of the grace of God, that
it holds out to us at the very first, as a gratuity, which it has cost
Christ much to purchase, but which it costs us nothing to acquire —
the forgiving, loving favor of the Most High. It asks us to dismiss
here all our doubts and fears ; to know and believe the love which
God has to us ; to see in Jesus one in whom we can undoubtingly
confide, who is absolutely to be depended on, on whom it is impossi-
ble that too much confidence can be reposed ; who by every way
that love could devise, or the spirit of self-sacrifice achieve, has
tried to get us to trust alone, unhesitatingly, habitually, for ever in
him.
What is it — how often do we ask these hearts of ours — what is it
which keeps us from welcoming such glad tidings ? What is it which
keeps these tidings from filling our hearts with a full and continued
joy ? What is it which keeps us from trusting one so entirely worthy
of our confidence as Jesus Christ ? Nothing whatever in the tidings ;
nothing in Him of whom the tidings speak.
Try if you can construct any form of words better fitted than
those which meet you in the Bible, clearly and forcibly to express
the idea that God is now in Jesus Christ most thoroughly prepared,
is most entirely willing, to receive at once into his favor every re-
pentant, returning child of Adam, and that there is not a single mail
anywhere, or upon any ground, shut out from coming and accepting
this pardon — coming and entering into this peace. " Ho ! every one
that thirsteth, come ye to the waters. If any man thirst, let him
oome to me aud drink. Come unto me, all ye that labor and are
846 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
heavy laden, and I will give you rest. God so loved the world, as tc
give his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him might
not perish, but have everlasting life. The Spirit and the Bride say,
Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is
athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life
freely." Any one — every one — all — whosoever; we know no other
words which could more thoroughly take in all, excluding none.
These, however, are but words. The great thing is to get fixed in
the mind and heart that which these words point to and express ;
that the God whom we have offended approaches us in love, in Christ,
assuring us of a gracious reception ; the embrace of a Father's guid-
ing, protecting arms, and the shelter hereafter of a Father's secure
and blessed home.
" Baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and
of the Holy Ghost." Our Lord's forerunner had adopted the practice
of baptizing those who desired to be regarded as his followers. His
baptism, however, was prefigurative and incomplete. It was simply
a baptism unto repentance. It was a faith only in the kingdom as
at hand that was required of those who submitted to it. But the
kingdom had come. The day of Pentecost, on which it was to be
visibly erected, was drawing near. Another higher and fuller bap-
tism was now to be proclaimed, and thenceforward to be administered.
Baptizing into the name : not simply in the name, of the Father,
the Son, and the Holy Ghost; this might mean no more than per-
forming the rite in the name, that is, by the authority of God. The
name of God, we know, is the term commonly employed in Scripture
to indicate the character and the nature of the Supreme. When the
expression meets us then — the name of the Father, the Son, and the
Holy Ghost — we understand it as expressive of the one nature re-
vealed to us in the three personalities of the Triune Jehovah. Now
to be baptized into that name is to be taken up into, to be incorpo-
rated with him whose name is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The
term is expressive or symbolic, not of a mere outward and formal
acknowledgment or confession of our faith in the Divinity, as he has
been pleased to reveal himself to us under that mysterious distinc-
tion of a threefold personality ; but of an inward and spiritual union,
communion, fellowship, with the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost.
The Israelites were all baptized unto Moses, and, as so baptized, were
taken up into, and incorporated with, that spiritual community of
which the Mosaic was an external type. They did all eat the same
spiritual meat, and did all drink the same spiritual drink; derived all
their strength and refreshment from the same spiritual sources. A nd
THE GREAT COMMISSION. 847
even so are all baptized into the name of the Father, the Son, and
the Holy Ghost, emblematic of that oneness with each and all of the
three persons of the Trinity, which the Saviour had in his eye when
he prayed for his own: "That they all may be one; as thou> Father,
art in me, and I in ihee, that they also may be one in us." And that
same oneness through Christ with the Father and the Holy Ghost, is
it not equally if not still more distinctly and impressively held out to
our view in the sacrament of the Supper? "The cup of blessing
which we bless, is it not the communion, or common participation, of
the blood of Christ ? The bread which we break, is it not the com-
munion, or common participation, of the body of Christ ? For we,
being many, are one bread and one body; for we are all partakers of
that one bread." Closest, loftiest, most blessed of all fellowships,
that to which in Jesus Christ we are elevated, and of which our par-
ticipation of the two sacraments of the church is the external sign.
"Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have com-
manded you." The crowning glory of the gospel — of its proclamation
of a free and full justification before God, alone through the merits
of the Saviour — is this, that it opens the way and supplies the motive
to a right and dutiful discharge of all commanded duty. Enthroning
Christ in the heart, planting deep within it, as its strongest and most
constraining motive, a supreme love to him, it produces an obedience
which springs not from fear, but from love. " If ye love me," said
Jesus to his disciples, "keep my commandments." He did not ques-
tion or suspect the reality of their love. He knew there was a kind
of love they all had to him. But that affection, tender as it was,
might not be strong; regarding him mainly in the character of a
companion or friend, it might fail to recognize him in the character
of their Master, their Lord. 'If ye indeed love me, then,' says Jesus
to them and to us, ' let not love die out in the mere feeling of attach-
ment to my person ; let it find its becoming and appropriate expres-
sion in the keeping of my commandments; so shall it be preserved
from evaporating in the emotion of the hour; so shall it be consoli-
dated into a fixed, a strong, a permanent principle of action.' All
love, even that of equal to equal, if unexpressed, if unembodied, has
a strong tendency to decline ; but if it be love of a dependent to a
superior, of a servant to a master, the love which does not clothe
itself in obedience, becomes spurious as well as weak. A bare ac-
knowledgment in words, or in some formal act of bare profession of
the fatherly or masterly relationship — what is it worth if the author-
ity of the father be disregarded, the orders of the master be diso-
beyed ? If we fail to regard Christ as the Lord of the conscience,
818 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the lawgiver of the life; if our obligations to be all and do all he has
commanded be unfelt; if the love we cherish to him go not forth into
action — such barren and unfruitful affection will not be recognized
bj him, who hath not only said, "If je love me, ye will keep my
commandments," but also, " He that hath my commaDdments and
keepeth them, he it is that loveth me." On the other hand, if our
love to Christ, however faint and feeble it be at the first, has not only
an eye to see him and admire his beauty, but an ear to hear him and
obey his word ; if under the strong conviction that, to offer love with-
out service to such a Saviour as Jesus is, would be but another vari-
ety of that mockery to which he was subjected in the judgment- hall
of Pilate ; if the sincere and honest effort be put forth to obey the
precepts he has given for the regulation of our heart and life — then
shall each fresh effort of that kind, however short it fall of its destined
aim, exert the happiest influence upon the love from which it springs,
quickening, expanding, elevating, intensifying it. Each new attempt
to do his will shall reveal something more of the loveableness of the
^Redeemer's character. The loving and the doing shall help each
other on, till the loving shall make the doing light; and by the doing
shall the loving be itself made perfect.
And one marked peculiarity of the obedience thus realized shall
be this, that all things whatsoever Christ hath commanded will be
attempted, at least, if not discharged. "Ye are my friends," said
Jesus, "if ye do whatsoever I command you;" a test of friendship
very sad and hopeless in the application of it, were it meant that
whatsoever Christ has commanded must be done, up to the full meas-
ure and extent of his requirement, before we could be reckoned as his
friends. Then were that friendship put altogether beyond our reach.
A test, however, both true and capable of immediate and universal
application, if we regard it as meaning that it is by the universality
of its embrace, and not by its perfection in any one individual in-
stance, that the obedience of the Christian is characterized; that there
shall not be one command which is freely, wilfully, and habitually
violated ; not one known duty which is not habitually tried to be dis-
charged. As ever then we hope to be acknowledged as his friends,
his true and faithful followers, let us esteem every precept he hath
given concerning everything to be right ; and let us give ourselves to
the unreserved, unrestricted doing of his will. Matt. 5 : 21, 27.
"Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world."
Jesus nad spoken much to his disciples about his departure from
them, about his leaving them alone. "I go my way," he had said to
them in the upper chamber, " and none of you asketh, Whither goest
THE GHEAT COMMISSION. 849
thou? A little while and ye shall not see me, and again a little while
and je shall see me, because I go to the Father. I came forth from
the Father, and am come into the world ; again, I leave the world,
and go to the Father. And ye now therefore have sorrow ; but I will
see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man
taketh from you." It was in such an affectionate, sympathizing way
that Jesus sought beforehand to prepare the minds and hearts of his
disciples for the shock of his death, the sorrow of his departure. For
a little while they did not see him ; he was lost in the darkness of the
sepulchre. Again, for a little while, they did see him, on those few
occasions when he made himself visible to them after his resurrec-
tion. Even, however, on one of the earliest of these appearances, he
seemed at pains to remove the idea from his disciples' minds that he
had returned in order to abide. "Touch me not," was his language
to Mary, "for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my
brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father and your
Father, and to my God and your God." It was as one on his way to
the Father, tarrying but a little while on the earth, that he desired
during the forty days to be recognized. But now, when in this great
interview on the mountain-side, he manifests forth his glory, takes to
himself his great power, announces the universal sovereignty which
had been put into his hands as the Mediator, issues the great com-
mission upon which, in all ages, his followers were to act, he closes
by speaking, not of his approaching departure, but of his continued,
his abiding presence : " Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end
of the world." The Omnipotent reveals himself thus as the Omni-
present also : ' Go ye into all nations, go to the farthest corner of the
habitable globe, but know that, go where you will, my presence goeth
with you. Labor on, generation after generation, but know that the
time shall never come when I shall leave you or forsake you. My
bodily presence I remove ; with the eye of sense you soon shall see
me no more ; but my spiritual presence shall never be withdrawn ; it
shall abide with you continually, even to the end of the world, till I
come again, till that time arrive when it shall no longer be said that
I will come to you to live with you — when I shall come to take you
to myself, that where I am there ye may be also.'
The richest legacy he could have left to it is this promise of his
abiding presence with the church. Looking at the church generally,
at the church in any one country or in any one city, any one section
of the church — we may often wonder and be afraid as we contemplate
the difficulties she has to contend with in going forth to execute the
great errand upon which she has been sent. This is the light, hOW-
Ufe of Chriai. 54
850 THE LIFE OF CHRIST,
ever, in all the darkness. All power has been given to Christ in
heaven and earth; he has been constituted Head over all things for
the church. This headship over all the principalities and powers of
darkness, this power over all things in heaven and earth, shall he not
employ in helping onward the great movement which is to give him
the heathen for his inheritance, the uttermost parts of the earth for
his possession ?
It is not indeed by bare might and power that this great con-
quest of the world is to be won. When Jesus says, "All power is
given unto me in heaven and earth," he does not add, Go ye there-
fore, and by the employment of so much of that power as I may
please to communicate, subdue all mine enemies, uproot all rival
thrones, set up and extend thy kingdom. No; but, Go teach and
preach, instruct, persuade; the conversion of the world to me must
be a thing of willingness, and not of compulsion. They must be
taught; for how shall they call on him in whom they have not
believed, and how shall they believe on him of whom they have not
heard, and how shall they hear without a preacher, and how shall
they preach except they be sent ? As it is written, " How beautiful
are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad
tidings of good things!" But not only must they be taught, the
people must be made willing in the day of the Lord's power— a
power which shall work on them, not from without but from within,
drawing them to himself. But how shall that power be brought into
full and living operation ? It comes, it works according to our faith,
in answer to our prayers ; it comes through the realizing of the pres-
ence of the Saviour; the pleading for the promise of the Spirit to be
fulfilled. Do we ask ourselves why it is that so many hundred years
have rolled away since these words were spoken in Galilee; since
the world was given by him into the hands of his followers, to go oul
upon it and reclaim it unto God, and yet so little progress has beeD
made towards the great consummation ; not half the globe yet evei
nominally won? The answer is at hand: Our lack of faith; ou
lack of prayer ; our lack of efforts undertaken in the name, and pros-
ecuted in the promised strength of the Redeemer.
But this great parting promise of our Lord is to be taken by us
as addressed not merely to the church at large in her collective
capacity, or as engaged in her public work of propagating the truti
as it is in Jesus. It is to be taken as addressed to every individual
Christian. "Behold," says Jesus, "I stand at the door, and knock
if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him
and will sup with him, and he with me." "If a man love me, he will
THE GREAT COMMISSION. 851
keep my words, and ray Father will love him, and we will come unto
him, and make our abode with him." I will come; I and my Father
will come. We will come. Was ever such a plural used as that!
Who is he who associates himself in this way with the omnipresent
and omnipotent Jehovah, who engages for the Father, and what he
©ngages for the Father undertakes equally himself? We will come
to him, not to paj a transient visit, not as the wayfaring man who
turns aside to tarry but for a night. We will take up our abode
with him. To have these words of Jesus realized in our daily,
hourly life, to know and believe that he is indeed with us, beside us,
has come to us, has taken up his abode with us, this is our comfort
and our strength. Nothing short of this will do. No general belief
in all that Jesus was and did and suffered here on earth, no belief in
anything about him, nothing but himself in living, loving presence,
seen and felt by us, as a presence as real as that of the closest com-
panionship of life; as real, but a thousand times closer, a thousand
times more precious.
How well he knows this who has said and done so much to
encourage his people in all ages to realize his presence with them in
all the stages of their earthly life! A famine drives Isaac from
Judea. He halts at Gerar, meditating a still farther flight. The
Lord appears to him and says, " Go not down into Egypt ; dwell
in the land which I shall tell thee of. Sojourn in this land, and
I will be with thee and bless thee." Let the patriarch but know
and feel that the Lord is with him, and no fear shall drive him
from the place which that God hath appointed as his habitation.
Sleeping Jacob lies with his head upon the stony pillow ; the vision
comes to him by night ; the Lord speaks to him from the top of the
mystic ladder : " Behold, L am with thee, and will keep thee in all
places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land,
for I will not leave thee till I have done that which I have spoken to thee
of." Let Jacob but carry a sense of that presence along with him,
and his solitary path and his fears of exile shall be lightened, and
that future, so dark to him as he fled from his father's presence, shall
be turned into light. It was a heavy task for hands like Joshua's to
undertake to be successor to such a man as Moses. When that
great leader of the people died, how destitute and helpless must
Joshua have felt ! What a crowd of difficulties must have risen up
before his mind, as standing in the way of the invasion and the con •
quest of Canaan ! But all his discouragements were met by thai
word of Jehovah : " Be strong and of a good courage ; as I was with
Moses, so I will be with thee ; I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.
852 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
There shall not any man be able to stand before thee all the days oi
thy life." Solomon had almost as difficult a succession to fill aa
Joshua. It was no easy duty to take David's place, and to carry
out his great design. But there was a way in which he might have
been strengthened for the task. " If," said the Lord to him, " thou
wilt hearken unto all that I command thee, I ivill be with thee, and
build thee a sure house." And still, whatever be the peculiarities of
our lot in life, the nature of the duties we have to discharge, the
difficulties to contend with, the trials to bear, the temptations to
meet, still it is the fulfilment of that most gracious promise, I iviU be
with thee, which alone can bear us up, and bear us through. Let us
rest more simply and entirely on it, trying, as we advance in life, to
have more and more of the spirit of the Psalmist, as he looked out
upon the future and said, " I will fear no evil, for thou art with me ,
thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. Surely goodness and mercy
shall follow me all the days of my life ; and I will dwell in the house
of the Lord for ever."
OUTLINE STUDIES.
Eight of the ten resurrection appearances of our Saviour have now
been surveyed. The first six took place in Judea, the seventh and
eighth in Galilee. For the ninth and tenth and the ascension the
present and closing Study returns to the field of Judea and to Jerusalem.
It should be said, however, that nothing is known about the ninth
appearance beyond the simple statement in the fifteenth chapter of the
first Epistle to the Corinthians that it was to James the Lord's brother.
As he and the mother of Christ are in the company assembling for
prayer in the upper room at Jerusalem immediately after the ascension,
it seems probable that Jesus' appearance to his brother was at Jerusalem
and that it was the means of James' conversion.
The tenth and concluding appearance was to the eleven at Jerusalem
just preceding the ascension. In connection with this appearance
Jesus gave explicit instructions to the eleven to tarry at Jerusalem
in prayer till they should be endued with power by the coming of the
Holy Spirit upon them. Then, beginning in Jerusalem, the good news
of salvation is to be spread through Judea and Samaria and unto the
uttermost part of the world.
His closing instructions being completed, Jesus leads the eleven
out to the Mount of Olives, parts from them in blessing, and ascends,
a cloud receiving him out of their sight.
The earthly manifestation of our Lord begun at Bethlehem is
sublimely completed by his ascension. Thenceforward he has worked
and still works through his spiritual presence, seeing of the travail of
his soul and bringing countless hosts unto glory.
THE ASCENSION. 853
PART VI. FORTY DAYS AND THE ASCENSION.
Study 25. Final Appearances at Jerusalem and Ascension.
(1) Summary of the earlier appearances 853
(2) TWO FINAL APPEARANCES 853
a. To James, the Lord's brother 853
b. To the eleven at the time of the ascension 853
(3) The Lord's parting interview with the apostles 854-859
a. They have returned to Jerusalem 854, 855
b. Jesus expounds the Scriptures concerning himself 856-859
c. He shows the widening sphere of the gospel 859
d. He promises the baptism of the Holy Spirit for power. 859
(4) The course to the Mount of Olives 860
a. Through the streets 860
b. Through the city gate 860
c. Past the Kedron and Gethsemane 860
d. Ascent of and across the summit of Olivet 860
e. Toward Bethany 860
(5) The Ascension 860-862
a. He lifts his hands in blessing 860
b. He rises 860
c. The cloud receives him 860
d. Associated words of angels and ideas of the second advent 861, 862
H ■
IX.
The Ascension.*
There are ten appearances of our Saviour after his resurrection
recorded in the New Testament. So many as five of them occurred
on the day of the resurrection : those, namely, to Mary Magdalene,
to the Galilean women, to Peter, to the two disciples on their way to
Emmaus, to the ten apostles and others assembled in the evening
within the upper chamber. The sixth appearance was to the eleven
and the rest on the evening of the seventh day from that on which
he rose from the dead. The seventh — spoken of by John as the
third time that he showed himself, inasmuch as it was the third
occasion upon which he had met with them collectively, or in any
considerable number together — was to the seven disciples by the sea
of Tiberias. The eighth was the great manifestation on the inoTin-
tain side of Galilee. The ninth, of which we should have known
nothing but for the simple record of it preserved in the fifteenth
chapter of the first epistle to the Corinthians, was to James the
brother of the Lord; and finally, the tenth, on the occasion of the
ascension. There may have been other unrecorded appearances of
our Lord. It is nowhere said in the gospels or epistles that there
were none else besides the ones related therein. But the nature of
* Luke 24 : 44-53 ; Acts 1 : 3^8.
854 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
the case, and the manner of the narrative, force upon us the belief
that if there were any such, they must have partaken of the charac-
ter of the manifestation to James; having a private and personal,
rather than a public object in view. But why, if his interviews with
his followers were so few, his intercourse with them so brief, so
broken, so reserved, did Jesus remain on earth so long ? Why were
so many as forty days of an existence such as his spent by him in
this way ? It may seem useless even to put a question to which no
satisfactory answer can be given, inasmuch as, beyond the mere
statement that he afforded thereby many infallible proofs of his
resurrection, nothing explicit is said in the Scriptures as to the par-
ticular object or design of this lingering of our Lord so long upon
the earth. And yet it is scarcely possible for us to forget, or to fail
in being struck by it, that this period of forty days was one which
had already been signalized in the history of redemption ; and look-
ing at the other instances in which it meets our eye in the Scripture
narrative, we are tempted to put the question, Was it as Moses was
withdrawn from men, to spend these forty days in fasting and prayer
on the mount with God, as the fit and solemn preparation for the
promulgation of the law through his hands at Sinai? Was it as
Elijah was carried away into the wilderness, to fast and pray there
for forty days, to prepare him for his great work as the restorer of
the law in Israel? Was it as Jesus himself, after his baptism, was
led by the Spirit into the wilderness, to fast there forty days, and at
the end to be tempted of the devil, to fit him for that earthly minis-
try which was to close in his death upon the cross ? Was it even so
that now, for another forty days, our Lord was detained on earth, as
the suitable preface or prelude to his entrance upon that higher
stage of the mediatorial work in which he is to sit upon the throne,
henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool ?
Passing, however, from a topic which must remain shrouded in
obscurity, let us take up the incidents of our Lord's parting inter-
view with his apostles. They have returned from Galilee, and are
now once more at Jerusalem. There might have been some specific
instructions to that effect delivered in private to themselves, or com-
municated to them through James, which brought the disciples back
from Galilee to Jerusalem. But we do not need to suppose that it was
bo, in order to account for the movement; for let us remember that
this period of forty days was immediately preceded by the great fes-
tival of the Passover, and followed by that of Pentecost, both of
which required the presence of the apostles at Jerusalem. It was
not till the first of them was over that they could well leave the Holy
THE ASCENSION. 855
City, and so you find them remaining there for a week after the
resurrection. And now the promised and appointed meeting in
Galilee having taken place, the approach of the second festival
naturally invited their return. However it came about, the fortieth
day after the resurrection saw the eleven and their companions once
more assembled at Jerusalem. Christ's former meetings with them
there collectively had been in the evening, in the closed chamber,
where they had assembled in secret for fear of the Jews. This last
one, though we know not when or how it commenced, may have
begun in the same upper chamber already hallowed by the former
meetings, but it was obviously at an earlier hour, and took place
in the broad daylight. The first, or earlier part of it — that spent
within the city — appears to have been devoted to the renewal and
expansion of such instructions as he had delivered to the two dis-
ciples on their journey to Emmaus. We gather this from the forty-
fourth to the forty-seventh verses of the twenty -fourth chapter of
St. Luke's gospel. It is very natural to read these verses in imme-
diate connection with those which go before, and to regard them
simply as a continuation of the narrative of what occurred at that
meeting on the evening of the resurrection day. And so indeed, in
common with the majority of readers, we were at first disposed to
regard them. By reading on to the end of the chapter, however,
you will at once perceive that the narrator, without any note or
mark of time, has condensed into one short and continuous state-
ment all that he had then to say about the period between the resur-
rection and the ascension; omitting so entirely all mention of any
after day or after meetings, that if you had had nothing but this last
chapter of Luke to guide you, you might have imagined — indeed,
could not well have thought anything else — that the ascension had
taken place on the very evening of the resurrection day. The same
narrative, however, Luke has, in the first chapter of the Acts, filled
up, and broken down into its parts the brief and summary notice
with which he had closed his gospel. And it is when we compare
what he says in the one writing with what he says in the other,
that we become persuaded that the verses from the forty-fourth
downward of the last chapter in his gospel belongs to and de-
scribes, not what happened in the evening interview on the day
of the resurrection, but what happened in the last interview of all
on the day of the ascension ; for you will notice as common to the
two accounts, the peremptory injunction laid upon the apostles,
that they were not to leave Jerusalem till the promise of the Fa-
ther had been fulfilled, and the baptism of the Spirit had been
856 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
conferred, Such an injunction would not have been proper to the
occasion of the first interview in the upper chamber. They were to
leave Jerusalem, and in point of fact did leave it, after that meeting,
to see the Lord in Galilee. According, however, to the account con-
tained in the Acts of the Apostles, it was after the command had
been given that they should not depart from Jerusalem that Jesus
spake to them of their being witnesses unto him in Jerusalem, and
in all Judea and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost parts of the
earth ; an announcement which corresponds with that contained in
the forty-seventh and forty-eighth verses of the chapter in the gos-
pel, leading us naturally to conclude that these verses relate to the
final meeting on the ascension day. We must make a break some-
where in the chapter of the gospel; and it seems, on the whole,
much more natural and consistent to make it at the end of the forty-
third that at the forty-eighth verse.
Adopting, then, this idea, we have the fact before us that, in the
first instance, when he met with the eleven in the course of that day
on which he was taken up into heaven, our Saviour occupied himself
with showing them how needful it was that all things that had been
written in the law of Moses and in the Prophets and in the Psalms
regarding him should be fulfilled ; with showing them how exactly
many of their ancient prophecies had met with their fulfilment in the
manner and circumstances of his death ; with showing them how it
behooved him to suffer, and through suffering to reach the throne of
that kingdom which he came to set up on the earth ; at once unfold-
ing to them the Scriptures, and opening their minds to understand
them. As on the first, so now on the last day of his being with them,
this was the chosen theme on which he dwelt; this the lesson upon
which a larger amount of pains and care was bestowed by our Lord
after his resurrection than upon any other. What weight and worth
does this attach to these Old Testament testimonies to his Messiah-
ship ! what a sanction does it lend to our searching of their prophetic
records, in the belief that we shall find much there pointing, in proph-
ecy and type and figure, to the Lamb slain before the foundation of
the earth, the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sins of the world.
Our Lord's exposition of these Scriptures could not have been
wholly in vain. The veil which had been upon the hearts of hia
apostles in their former reading of the prophecies must have been at
least partially removed. Their notions of a Messiah coming only to
conquer, only to restore and establish and extend the old Jewish the-
ocracy, must have been materially altered and rectified. When, then,
after all these expositions of their Master — after all the fresh light he
THE ASCENSION. 857
had thrown upon the true nature of his kingdom and the manner of
its establishment, you find them coming to him and saying, " Lord,
wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?" it could
scarcely be that, ignoring all they had just heard, and clinging still
to their first belief, they were inquiriDg about an immediate erection
of a temporal and visible kingdom. Let us rather believe that, accept-
ing all which Jesus had taught them, admitting now fully the idea of
a suffering and dying Messiah, their conceptions altered and elevated
at once as to the kind of kingdom he was to set up, and the way in
which thai kingdom was to be established and advanced — building
upon these new foundations, their old spirit of curiosity found now a
new object on which to fasten. They saw now the need there was
that Jesus should have suffered all these things ; but still there was
a kingdom which, through these sufferings, he was to reach, a glory
on which, when these were over, he was to enter. Still there lay
within these prophecies, which their minds had now been opened to
understand, many a wonderful announcement of the part which Israel
was to take in the erection and consolidation of the Redeemer's
empire upon this earth. So much had already been accomplished by
their Lord and Master. He had been wounded for their transgres-
sions, bruised for their iniquities; was he now to see of the travail
of his soul; to divide the portion with the great, the spoil with the
strong ? Were nations that knew not him to run unto him ; was he
to be exalted as Governor among the nations; were all the ends of
the earth to remember and turn unto the Lord, all the kindreds of
the nations to worship before him ; was his law to go forth of Zion.
and his word from Jerusalem ; and were the nations, as it had been
predicted they should do in the latter days, the days of the Messiah's
reign, to be heard saying, " Come and let us go up to the mountain of
the Lord, and to the house of the God of Jacob " ? " Lord," they say
to him, with some such thoughts floating vaguely through their
minds, "wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?"
Jesus, in answering that question, does not blame, does not rebuke ;
says nothing that would imply that they were radically wrong in the
hopes which they were cherishing ; that there was no such kingdom
as that they were asking about. Nay, rather, does he not assume
that the kingdom was to be restored to Israel ; that the question was
only one as to time ; that it was here, in their too eager haste and
impatience, that the error of the disciples lay? "And he said unto
them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the
Father hath put in his own power;" a somewhat different declaration
from that which Jesus made when, speaking of the time of his own
858 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
second advent, lie said, " Of that day and hour knoweth no man, not
the angels of God," no, not even the Son in his character as the great
prophet and revealer of the future to the church, but the Father
only. But he does not say that he himself was ignorant of the times
and the seasons. He only says that it was not for them, the disci-
ples, to know them. They were among the secret things which the
Father had reserved and kept within his own power, to reveal when
and how and to whom he pleased. Would that these words of
Jesus — among the last he ever uttered — had been sufficiently pon-
dered by our prophetic interpreters in their pryings into the unknown
future which lies before us. Curiosity as to that future is not unnat-
ural. There are so many things to make us desire to see things
otherwise and better ordered than they now are. There lie too on
the pages of prophecy so many things which remain yet to be accom-
plished, such bright and glorious visions of a coming period of tri-
umph for the truth, a coming reign of peace and virtue and piety
upon this earth, that we are not disposed to quarrel much with those
whose eyes are turned longingly upon a future out of whose pregnant
bosom such great and glorious things are to emerge. But we are
most imperatively bound to keep our curiosity here under that check
which the hand of the Bedeemer himself has laid upon it, and to
remember that he has told us of many things which are yet to come
to pass, not that we might be able to predict them, to specify before-
hand the dates of their arrival, but that when they do come to pass
we might believe.
But if that kind of knowledge which they were seeking for was
denied to the disciples, another and better thing was to be given them
instead. They were to receive power from on high to execute that
great mission upon which they were to be sent forth ; that mission
was to consist in their proclaiming everywhere repentance and remis-
sion of sins in the name of Jesus ; and beginning at Jerusalem as
the centre, they were to go forth, not as prophets of the future, but
as witnesses of the past, witnesses for Christ, to carry the glad tidings
abroad through all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost
parts of the earth. Three things are noticeable here :
1. The simplicity of the gospel message as originally promulgated
by Christ himself. Eepentance, a turning from all evil, a turning with
irue and penitent spirit to God ; remission of sins, the covering of all
past transgression by an act of grace on the part of God ; the remis-
sion of sins, offered in the name of Jesus, coming only, but coming
directly, immediately, fully, in and through the name of him who is
the one all-prevalent Mediator between man and God ; such was the
THEASCENSION. 859
burden of that simple message which, in parting from them, Jesua
committed to his disciples to make known over all the earth.
2. The wider and wider compass of that sphere over which this
message was to be borne by them. Upon the universality of its
embrace — its being a message for all mankind, for men of every age
.ind country, character, and condition — we have already briefly
commented ; but let us not overlook here the fact as pointing to the
true order in which all evangelistic labors should be prosecuted,
that the apostles were to begin at Jerusalem, to go throughout all
Judea, to penetrate Samaria with the glad tidings, and then to bear
them on to the uttermost parts of the earth. Whatever else may
have lain at the bottom of these instructions, this at least is apparent,
that their own capital, their own country, their own kindred, their
own immediate neighbors were first to have the tender made to them.
Are we wrong in interpreting the direction of our Saviour as imply-
ing that all Christian effort should be from the centre to the circum-
ference ; should be so directed as to fill the inner circles first — the
circles of our own heart, our own home, our own city, our own coun-
try ; and that if, overlooking these, neglecting these, we busy our-
selves among the broader, wider, outer circles, we are reversing the
order and running counter to the directions of the Master whom we
serve ? I shall not venture here to say how much better I think it
would be for ourselves and for others, for Christianity and for the
world, if, instead of embarking in enterprises which fascinate by the
wideness of their scope, but upon which, just because of that wide-
aess, so much labor is wasted, each man were to cultivate the little
sphere which lies more immediately around him.
3. We notice the qualification for Christian work, the baptism of
the Holy Spirit bestowing the needed power. The apostles had a
great commission given, a great task assigned; the wide world set
forth as the field of their future labors. But they were not as yet
prepared to execute this commission, to take up this work. They
were to wait in Jerusalem ; to wait some days ; do nothing but w r ait
and pray and hope; a good and useful lesson in itself, subduing,
restraining the spirit of eager and impatient self-confidence — a lesson
which is still in force; that pause, that period of inaction, those ten
days of stillness between the day of the ascension and the day of
Pentecost, as full of instruction still to us as of benefit originally to
the disciples. And when the baptism of fire at last was given, the
wanting element was supplied, said here by Christ himself to be
power: * Tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with
power from on high." " Ye shall receive power after that the Holy
860 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me, both in
Jerusalem and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost-
part of the earth." Not knowledge so much was wanted but power;
a firmer grasp of truth already known; a stronger, deeper, steadier
attachment to a Saviour already loved ; conviction, affection ripened
iato abiding, controlling, enduring principle of action; power to be,
to do, to suffer. Is not that the very thing which in religion we all
most need; the very thing we feel we cannot ourselves attain; the
very thing which it requires the baptism of a heavenly influence to
bestow ?
But let us follow Jesus to the mount called Glivet. His closing
counsels given, he leads his disciples out of the city. Did they, in
open day, pass along through the streets of Jerusalem ? If they did,
how many wondering eyes would rest upon the well-known group of
Galilean fishermen ; how many wondering eyes would fix upon the
leader of that group — the Jesus of Nazareth, whom six weeks before
they had seen hanging upon the cross at Calvary. Little heeding
the looks which they attract, they pass through the city gate. They
are now on a well-known track; they cross the Kedron; they ap-
proach Gethsemane. We lose sight of them amid the deep shadows
of these olive-trees. Has Jesus paused for a moment to look, for the
last time, with those human eyes of his, upon the sacred spot where
bo cast himself on the night of his great agony, upon the ground ?
Once more they emerge; they climb the hillside; they cross its sum-
mit ; they are approaching Bethany. He stops ; they gather round.
He looks upon them; he lifts his hands; he begins to bless them.
What love unutterable in that parting look ; what untold riches in
that blessing ! His hands are uplifted ; his lips are engaged in bless-
ing, when slowly he begins to rise : earth has lost her power to keep ;
the waiting, up-drawing heavens claim him as their own. An attrac-
tion stronger than our globe is on him, and declares its power. He
rises ; but still as he floats upward through the yielding air, his eyes
are bent on these up-looking men ; his arms are stretched over them
in the attitude of benediction, his voice is heard dying away in bless-
ings as he ascends. Awe-struck, in silence they follow him with
straining eyeballs, as his body lessens to sight, in its retreat upward
into that deep blue, till the commissioned cloud enfolds, cuts off all
further vision, and closes the earthly and sensible communion between
Jesus and his disciples. That cloudy chariot bore him away, till he
was " received up into heaven, and sat down on the right hand of God."
How simple, yet how sublime, how pathetic this parting! No
disturbance of the elements, no chariot of fire, no escort of angels;
''Received up into Heaven."
THE ASCENSION. SGI
nothing to disturb or distract the little company from whom he parts ;
nothing to the very last to break in upon that close and brotherly
communion, which is continued as long as looking eye and listening
ear can keep it up. But who shall tell us — when these earthly links
were broken, and that cloud carried him to the farthest point in
which cloud could form or float, and left him there — who shall tell us
what happened above, beyond, on the way to the throne ; in what
new form of glory, by what swift flight, attended by what angel es-
cort, accompanied by what burst of angelic praise, that throne of the
universe was reached ? Our straining eyes we too would turn up-
ward to those heavens which received him, and wonder at the recep-
tion which awaited him there, till on our ears there falls that gentle
rebuke, " Why stand ye gazing up into heaven?" 'Think not with
eyes like yours to pierce that cloud which hides the world of spirits
from mental vision. Enough for you to know that this same Jesus
shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go.'
This mild rebuke was given to the men of Galilee upon the moun-
tain top by two men in white apparel, who stood beside them, their
presence unnoted till their words had broken the deep silence, and
drawn upon themselves that gaze hitherto directed towards heaven ;
two angels, perhaps the two who watched by the empty sepulchre ;
one of them the same who in the hour of his great agony had been
sent to strengthen the sinking Saviour in the garden, now stationed
here at Olivet to soften, as it were, to the disciples the sorrow of this
parting, to turn that sorrow into joy. But how at that moment, when
they were discharging this kindly but humble office, were the heav-
enly host engaged ? Surely, if at the emerging out of chaos of this
beautiful and orderly creation, those sons of God chanted together
the new world's birthday hymn; surely, if in that innumerable host
above the plains of Bethlehem, a great multitude of them celebrated,
in notes of triumph, a still better and more glorious birth — the entire
company of the heavenly host must have struck their harps to the
fullest, noblest, richest anthem that ever they gave forth, as the great
Son of God, the Saviour of mankind — his earthly sorrows over, his
victories over Satan, sin, and death complete — sat down that day with
the Father on his throne, far above all principalities and powers, and
every name that is named, not only in this world, but in that which
is to come. Did these two angels who were left behind on earth, who
Siad this humbler task assigned them, feel at all as if theirs were a
lower, meaner service ? No, they had too much of the spirit of Him
who had for forty days kept that throne waiting to which he had
no\i ascended, that he might tabernacle still a little longer with the
862 THE LIFE OF CHRIST.
children of men. "Inasmuch as ye have done it unto the least ol
these my brethren, ye have done it unto me."
" Why gaze ye up into heaven ? This same Jesus shall so come
in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven." ' This is not a
final departure of this Jesus from the world he came to save. Thai
was not the last look the earth was ever to get of him that you got of
him as the clouds covered him from your view. He is to come again ;
to come in the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.' But
for that, perhaps the disciples might have returned to Jerusalem with
sad and downcast spirits, as those from whose head their Master had
been for ever taken away. As it was, they returned, we are told, with
great joy ; the sorrow of the departure swallowed up in the hope of
the speedy return. So vivid, indeed, was the expectation cherished
by the first Christians of the second advent of the Lord, that it need-
ed to be chastened and restrained. They required to have their
hearts directed into a patient waiting for that coming. It is very dif-
ferent with us. We require to have that faith quickened and stimu-
lated, which they needed to have chastened and restrained. It is
more with wonder than with great joy that we return from witness-
ing the ascension of our Lord. But let us remember that though the
heavens have received him, it is not to keep him there apart for ever
from this world. He himself cherishes no such feeling of retirement
and separation now that he has ascended up on high. I have spo-
ken to you of his last words of blessing which fell audibly upon fleshly
ears. But what are the very last words that in vision he uttered:
"He that testifieth these things saith, Surely, I come quickly." Our
crowned Saviour waits ; with eager expectancy waits the coming of
the day when his presence shall be again revealed among us. It may
seem slow to us, that evolution of the ages which is preparing all
things for his approach. But with him who says, "I come quickly,"
one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day ;
and as soon as the curtain shall drop on the last act of that great
drama of which this earth is now the theatre, then, quick as love and
power can carry him, shall the same Jesus be here again on earth-
coming in like manner as these men of Galilee saw him go up to
heaven. Are we waiting for that coming, longing for that coming,
hastening to that coming? Are we ready, as he says to us, "Beholdf
I come quickly," to add as our response, "Amen. Even so cense,
Lord Jesus 1"
r
SEP 90 1913
trw i
m
■ ■
M
■ H
■
.,«
*.45
Eft
«■
■
tofctt
i3.v
**-
75..'
■
^fc
1 \$
**■"
I
H
I
1
h
*„;•*
^H_
^H
■
■■a*-
^m
m
t ^
■
■
■