THE FIXATION OF ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN BY SWEET CLOVER A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY LEONARD AMBY MAYNARD THE FIXATION OF ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN BY SWEET CLOVER A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY LEONARD AMBY MAYNARD [Reprinted from Bulletin No. 394, November. 191 7, of Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, where it appeared under the title, "The Decomposition of Sweet Clover (Melllotus Alba Desr.) as a Green Manure under Greenhouse Conditions."! CONTENTS PAGE Review of literature 122 Sweet clover culture 122 Decomposition of green manure 124 Experimental work 126 Soil used 126 The seed 128 The pots 130 Season of 1914 130 Season of 1916 139 Discussion of results 142 Production of dry matter and nitrogen 142 Percentage of fiber 143 Rate of decay 144 Summary 1 46 Bibliography 148 119 THE DECOMPOvSITION OF SWEET CLOVER (MELILOTUS ALBA DESR.) AS A GREEN MANURE UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS ^ L. A. Maynard The practice of ^3 25 . 82 25 63 23.84 2451 Pot TABLE 3. Yield and Composition of Crops (Duration of growth, 118 days) Treatment Dry matter produced Grams Percentage of nitrogen Nitrogen produced (grams) Crude fiber (per cent) 25 26 29 30 33 34 Unlimed Unlimed Slaked lime Slaked lime Ground limestone Ground limestone .42 .29 30 ■25 ■03 •19 0.6416 0.6399 0.8451 0.7881 0.8175 0.8020 52 40 66 73 76 79 Decomposition of Sweet Clover as a Gkeen Manure 135 It is seen in table 1 that little dry matter was ijroduced in the first two months of growth and that no differences due to liming are discernible. During the third month the growth increased fourfold on the unlimed pots and an even greater growth resulted in the soil to which lime had been added. The dry matter produced during the first three months was doubled during the fourth, and here again the effect of lime was manifest. The results indicate that in order to obtain the largest yield the lime requirement of the soil should be satisfied; the yields for the two kinds of lime do not differ sufficiently, however, to permit any suggestion as to w^hich is the better form to apply. The results for nitrogen content show that sweet clover compares favorably in this respect with other legumes. The percentages do not vary widely, but the figures indicate that the nitrogen content per gram of dry weight reaches a maximum before the end of the four-months growth. The figures showing the amount of nitrogen produced follow those for dry matter rather closely. The percentage of fiber appears to be somewhat greater at the end of the second period of growth than at either of the other times of examination. This seems rather surprising, but probably may be explained on the basis of the cultural observations made. It was observed that during the second period the greatest increase in height and thickness of stems occurred, while the final period was characterized by a develop- ment of foliage. Thus in the last period a proportionally smaller amount of woody tissue was fonned and the percentage of crude fiber dropped. A comparison of reported analyses of sweet clover for fiber shows a wide variation in the results obtained, depending on the locality, the time of cutting, and other factors. In general, analyses show a crude fiber content of from 30 to 35 per cent at blooining time the second season. From the standpoint of rate of decay, the crop should be of much more value at the end of the first season, when the fiber content is from 10 to 15 per cent less. Figuring the results obtained in the pot experiments to the acre basis, it is found that at the end of the four-months growth the yield from the pots limed with ground limestone corresponds to about two tons per acre. The nitrogen produced corresponds to 115 pounds per acre, an amount to supply which would require ten tons of stable manure. It is realized that this computation is of limited value, in that considerable error may enter into the calculation. Further, it is realized that results under field conditions might vary considerably from those obtained in pot experiments. However, the figures arc iiseful for the interpreta tion of the results given in the tables, and they indicate what sweet clo\'er would do in the same soil in the field under optimmn conditions. 136 Bulletin 394 It has already been stated that no method has been devised which will measure the rate of decay of organic matter thru all its stages, and that none of the methods in use at the present time for studying this problem are free from objections. The question arose as to whether a more satisfactory method could be devised. In this connection it seemed possible that some modification of the alkaline permanganate method as devised by Jones (19 12) might be applicable. In this method a sample containing 50 milligrams of water-insoluble organic nitrogen is washed free from soluble salts, and digested below the distillation point with a definite amount of alkaline permanganate of definite strength for thirty minutes. The temperature is then raised, and during the next sixty minutes 95 cubic centimeters of the sam]jle is distilled over into standard acid. The nitrogen thus obtained is designated as active water-insoluble nitrogen. It is considered to be that portion which will rapidly become available for plant use. The method has demonstrated its value in differentiating between high- and low-grade sources of nitrogen in com- mercial fertilizers. Its disadvantages are that it is empirical and may give varying results with different investigators. As regards its adapt- ability to the determination of the availability of soil nitrogen, it seemed possible that with a given soil and a given source of organic matter the rate of decay might be indicated by the increasing amounts of ammonia distilled from the permanganate solution. It seemed that if the manipu- lations were carried out with exactness, results comparable with one another might be obtained. The possibility was considered worthy of experiment. After a number of trials of the alkaline permanganate method, it was found to be inapplicable to the pur]30se desired. A few of the results obtained are given, because of their bearing in explaining the failure of the method. A sample of soil containing the prescribed amount of organic nitrogen was treated according to the procedure outlined for a fertilizer material. Similarly, a sample of plant material was examined. Next, a composite sample of soil and plant material containing the required amount of organic nitrogen was run. The active nitrogen obtained was about 25 per cent below the theoretical amount on the basis of the materials examined separately. Using a larger amount of permanganate solution, the results were somewhat higher but still did not equal the theoretical. Samples of soil were next examined with varying amounts of the reagent. The following results were obtained: Amount of reagent Active nitrogen (cubic centimeters) (grams) 100 (prescribed amount) o .01876 125 0.02072 150 o .023 10 200 0.02501 Decomposition of Sweet Clover as a Green Manure 137 Thus the amount of active nitrogen increased with the amount of the reagent. On examination it was found that the supernatant hquid in the Kjeldahl flask after digestion was colorless in each case. This showed that all the permanganate had been used up; thus it, and not the organic matter, became the limiting factor in determining the amount of nitrogen obtained. It became evident that the reagent was reacting with other substances besides the organic matter, notably the iron of the soil. A trial on the portion of the soil remaining after ignition showed this to be true. It was thus seen that the alkaline pennanganate method was not applicable to the determination of the availability of soil-organic nitrogen unless the organic matter could be separated from the mineral part. In this connection the method of separating the organic from the mineral constituents of commercial fertilizers as devised by Jones and Anderson (191 4) suggested itself. Jones has applied this method to muck soils high in organic matter. It was not found to work satisfactorily for light soils, and was not applicable to the work with Volusia silt loam. Attention was next turned to the methods previously mentioned as used in measuring rate of decay ; and, inasmuch as these experiments were conducted under well-defined conditions, it was decided to adopt the method of determining the nitrates formed. It was further decided to study only the ])ots in which the crops had been turned under at the end of the second and tliird periods, since the dry matter produced at the end of two months growth proved to be too little to make profitable the turning-under of a crop at this period. At harvest, the nitrates were deteiTnined in all the pots of the last two series. The jjots were then kept under constant conditions for four months and the nitrates again deter- mined. At the beginning of the period an effort was made to have the soil at the same degree of compactness so that the oxygen supply might not vary, and a moisture content of 30 per cent was maintained thruout. It is realized, of course, that nitrates accumulated under a green manure may not necessarily ha\'e resulted from its decomposition. It may be considered that the green manure is changed to nitrates, or it may be considered that the organic matter increases the nitrification of sources of nitrogen already ]3resent in the soil. Doubtless both these processes obtain. However, where check pots having no green manure are used, as in these experiments, the net gain in nitrates as a result of adding the green manure can be shown. The production of available nitrogen as a result of the addition of the organic matter is thus shown, and this is really the object (^f an exjjeriment of this kind. The samples taken for the nitrate determination were allowed to air-dry beff)re the analysis was made and the results were then figured to tlie moislurc-frce basis, ll is rcahzcd llial in drying in air, nitrate formation is accelerated, and thai as a consequence the results so obtained 138 Bl'LLETlN 394 are higher than when the examination is made immediately after sampHng. Circumstances prevented the following of the latter ])rocedure. Inasmuch as the samples taken when the crop was turned under, and after the period of four months, were handled identically, the figures for the difference in nitrate content at these periods should not be greatly affected by the increase due to drying. . The nitrates formed during four months in the pots having the plants removed or turned under after a growth of 89 days, are shown in table 4, and in table 5 are shown the same results for the ii8-days period: TABLE 4. Formation of Nitr.a.tes (Crop turned under after 89 days growth) Pot Treatment Treatment of crop at harvest Nitrates at harvest (parts per million) Nitrates after four months (parts per million) 13 14 Unlimed Unlimed Removed Removed Turned under Turned under Removed Removed Turned under Turned under Removed Removed Turned under Turned under 72 59 55 69 76 87 89 124 149 140 160 129 59 53 45 60 15 t6 Unlimed Unlimed . . 17 18 19 Slaked lime Slaked lime Slaked lime 70 87 148 212 209 181 339 270 20 21 22 23 24 Slaked lime Ground limestone Ground limestone Ground limestone Ground limestone TABLE 5. Formation of Nitrates (Crop turned under after 1 1 8 days growth) Pot Treatment Treatment of crop at harvest Nitrates at harvest (parts per million) Nitrates after four months (parts per million) Unlimed Unlimed Unlimed Removed . . 54 61 72 66 99 145 135 147 70 66 140 124 76 26 Removed 64 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Turned under Turned under Removed Removed Turned under Turned under Removed Removed .Turned under Turned under 185 Unlimed Slaked lime Slaked lime Slaked lime. . . 122 185 225 319 Slaked lime . 422 Ground limestone Ground limestone Ground limestone Ground limestone . ... I3f^ 107 444 367 Decomposition of Sweet Clover as a Green Manure 139 It is noted tliat in each period there were four pots treated alike as rej^ards liming, and that at harvest the erop was removed from two of these pots and turned under in the other two. It is natural that nitrification should have occurred in all the pots, with the possible exception of the unlimed ones, due to the favorable conditions maintained. The original soil contained 57 parts of nitrate per million on the moisture-free fine basis, or 53 parts per million in the dry soil as put into the pots. Thus by noting the figures for nitrates at harvest it is seen that there was an increase during the period of growing the crop, an increase more marked in the limed pots. In table 4 it is shown that in the unlimed pots the nitrates did not increase in the four months following harvest. It may be assumed that decomposition occurred to some exteAt, as evinced by the fact that at the end of the period the plant material, with the exception of a few roots, could not be distinguished in the soil, but that conditions were not right for complete decay. In table 5 it is seen that following harvest the nitrates increased somewhat in the unlimed pots from which the crop was removed, and that there was a decided increase in the pots in which the material was turned under. Nitrate formation was much greater in the limed than in the unlimed pots. The examination of the original soil placed in the pots when the culture experiments were started indicated that conditions had been unfavorable for decomposition processes to go on. It may be considered that the physical conditions and the water relationships for the soil in the pots were more favorable for decay than the conditions obtaining in the field from which the soil was taken. However, a comparison of the results obtained for the limed and the unlimed pots indicates that lime was the larger factor in bettering the conditions favoring decomposition, due to its effect in producing a more favorable medium for the activity of micro ■ organisms. A study of tables 4 and 5 shows that the results vary rather widely in duplicate pots, and makes evident the sensitiveness of nitrate formation to slight variations even under accurately controlled conditions. In the discussion at the end of this paper the probable errors of the results are computed, in order to show how large variations may be expected under the conditions of these experiments. season of 1916 The experimental work conducted in 19 14 was repeated in part m 19 16. The data obtained in the first season indicated that, from the standpoint of amount of available green manure produced, the four- months period gave the best results. Consequently, it was decided to T40 BiTLLETIN 304 i^row Llic ijlaiiLs lor tliis ])cri()(l in i(;i6 before iurninj.^' under. In view of the previous season's work it seemed desirable that a repetition of the experiment should ]:)roduce results of greater value in drawing conclusions as to rate of decay. It was hoped that the variations in the results for nitrate formation might be reduced by a repetition of the work. The soil used in the second season's work is described on page 126. Seed was again obtained from the Bokhara Seed Company. Four pots limed with slaked lime, four limed with ground limestone, and four unlimed, were set u]j. The seed was sown on Jtme 2. The cultural observations made were similar to those reported for 1 9 14. During the first six weeks diiferences due to lime were not noticeable. Thereafter, however, more rapid growth on the limed soil became increasingly evident. Toward the end of the growings period the plants on the unlimed soil were characterized by an unhealthy color and by the dying of the leaves. The plants were harvested after a growth of 116 days. The roots and the tops were removed from all the pots and a sample of the soil was taken. As in 1914, the plants from two pots of each series as regards liming were saved for analysis. The plants from the remaining pots were incorporated with the soil. All pots were then maintained at a moisture content of 30 per cent, pending later exainination for ra e of decay. In taking up the plants it was evident that the roots did not bear as many nodules as in 1914, but the nodules were somewhat larger. The limed plants were more plentifully supplied and their root systems were much better developed. This was markedly shown by branching at the crown. The plants removed were allowed to air-dry and were then analyzed, as in 1 9 14. The re.sults are given in table 6: TABLE 6. Yield and Composition of Crops (Duration of growth, 116 days) Treatment Dry matter produced Nitrogen produced (grams) Crude Pot Grams Percentage of nitrogen fiber (per cent) 40 41 44 45 48 49 Unlimed 18.76 17-77 33-65 30 94 29 -45 25-51 2.77 2.79 3.22 3.00 2.97 332 0-5197 0.4958 I 0835 0.9282 0.8747 . 8469 23-13 Unlimed Slaked lime 24.24 23 34 vSlaked lime Ground limestone 22.05 23-85 Ground limestone 24 ■ 85 Decomposition of vSwert Clover as a Green Manitre 141 These results suljslantiale (hose njjiained in 1(^14. A c<;niijarison of tables 3 and 6 shows that lime ijrodueed a somewhat K'rcater effect in 1916 than in the previous season. The figures for percentage of nitrogen are similar exce])t as regards the imlimed pots. It was noted that the plants growing on the unlimed soil appeared less vigorous in 19 16 than in 19 14. That they were poor in color, indicating lack of nitrogen, has already been stated. The figures for fiber content agree fairly closelv with those obtained the previous season. The samples of soil taken at harvest were examined for nitrates in the moist condition. Inasmuch as the drying of a soil is known to affect its nitrate content, it was thought that this procedure might give more accurate and more uniform results than were obtained in 1914. Following harvest the i3ots were maintained at a moisture content of 30 per cent for four months. During this period all possible care was taken to keep conditions similar in the different pots. In sampling the soil at the end of the four-months period, no tops still showing their original form were found; however, several imdecomi^osed root crowns were found in each of the pots in which the plants had been turned under. The samples of soil taken at this period were also examined for nitrates immediately after sampling. The results of these determinations are given in table 7 : TABLE 7. FoRM.\TiON of Nitr.\tes (Crop turned under after 116 days growth) Pot Treatment Treatment of crop at harvest Nitrates at harvest (parts per million ) Nitrates after four months (parts per million) 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Unlimed Unlimed Unlimed Unlimed Slaked hme Slaked lime Slaked lime . . Removed Removed Turned under Turned under Removed Removed Turned under Turned under Removed 5 7 5 4 17 II 9 17 8 14 8 9 20 24 47 25 60 41 283 230 52 60 240 228 Slaked lime Ground limestone Ground limestone Ground limestone Removed Turned under Turned under The soil used in 19 16 contained 3 parts of nitrates per million. It is seen from the table that there was an increase as a result of growing the crop, and that the increase was more marked in the limed pots. The results obtained for nitrate formation due to turning under the crop follow, in general, those obtained in the previous season. A statistical studv of this table is made in the general discussion of results. 142 Bulletin 394 DISCISSION OF RESTLTS A brief discussion of the results furnished by this investigation has been given following the tables in which the data obtained are listed. For a consideration of the results to determine what conclusions may be drawn from the experimental work, it is necessary to study the data for both seasons as a unit, and in so far as possible to apply statistical methods in this study. Production of dry matter and nitrogen A glance at table i (page 134) shows that the different methods of treatment did not result in any evident differences in production for the first period of growth. A comparison of the yields listed in this table with those given in tables 2 and 3, indicates that it is not desirable to turn under the crop at this stage of growth. That the effect of lime is evident during the second period of growth is indicated in table 2. In order to decide how conclusive the results were, the probable errors of the means were computed according to Peter's formula,'' ± 0.8453 V^ in which - ( + d) denotes the sum of the deviations of every observation from the mean, their signs being disregarded, and n represents the number of observations. In comparing two means the probable error of the gain due to a given treatment was computed according to the formula E= vfEr' + Ea' , in which Ei is the probable error of one mean and Eo of the other. The results of these computations are given in table 8, in which the different treatments are lettered A, B, and C: TABLE 8. Statistical vStudy of Table 2 Treatment Mean grams of dry matter Mean grams of nitrogen (A) Unlimed (B) Slaked lime.-.. . . (C) Ground limestone Gain, B over A Gain, C over A 9 21 ± .34 II .30 dz .68 II .28 ± .14 0.3216 ± .0060 0.4125 ± .0185 0.4313 ± .0022 2.09 2,07 76 37 0.0909 d= o. 1097 =fc .0194 .0064 «A probable error based on two determinations does not necessarily represent strictly the actual frequency diagram, and this must be borne in mind in considering many of the probable errors computed in this bulletin. A discussion of the probable error when the number of observations is small is given in an article in Biometrika, volume 6, entitled The Probable Error of a Mean. Decomposition of Sweet Clover as a Green Manure 143 Assuming that odds of 30 to i represent a chance which is practical certainty, a gain must be 3.12 times its probable error to make certain its significance. On this basis it is seen that the gains calculated in table 8 are significant, except that for dry matter from the slaked-lime pots in comparison with the unlimed pots. Here the gain falls just below the value postulated to denote certainty. It is believed, however, that table 8, taken as a whole, shows that the effect of lime was evident during the second period of growth. In considering the results obtained for four months growth, tables 3 and 6 are available. Thus four yields for a given treatment are averaged to obtain the mean. In computing the probable errors of these means the same formulas were used as for table 8. The results are given in table 9: TABLE 9. Statistical Study of Tables 3 and 6 Treatment Mean grams of nitrogen (A) Unlimed (B) Slaked lime (C) Ground limestone Gain, B over A Gain, C over A Gain, B over C o 5743 ± .0324 091 12 ± 0462 0,8353 ± .0148 0.3369 ± .0566 o 2610 ± 0362 o 0759 ± .0484 A perusal of table g shows that the gains due to lime are significant but when the two kinds of lime are compared the difference is not sufficient to allow of any conclusion. The limed crop produced, roughh', 50 per cent more dry matter and nitrogen than did the unlimed. Percentage of fiber A study of the tables does not reveal any differences in fiber content due to different methods of treatment. It is indicated, however, that TABLE 10. ST.A.TISTICAL Study of Crude-Fiber Content Duration of growth (months) 2 3 4 Gain, 3 months over 2 months Gain, 4 months over 2 months Gain, 3 months over 4 months Mean percentage of crude fiber 21 .28 zb .32 24.79 ± .:i2 23.36 ± .25 3.51 ± -45 2 . 08 ± .41 1 43 ± 41 144 Bulletin 394 there is a difference due to time of harvest. Therefore, the averages of the results obtained for the different periods are Hsted, with their probable errors computed according to Peter's formula. For the four- months period the results of both years are included. The figures are given in table 10. From this table it is evident that the fiber content was least at the end of the first period of growth. There was also a small decrease during the last period as compared with the second. While this may not be a general characteristic, that it did obtain under the conditions of these experiments was indicated by cultural observations as well as by analysis. It may be concluded that from the standpoint of fiber content there is no disadvantage in allowing sweet clover to grow for the four-months period before turning it under for green manure. Rate of decay The variations in the values tabulated as a result of the nitrate deter- minations make evident the necessity of computing probable errors before discussing these values. A statistical study of nitrate formation, made up from the data listed in tables 4, 5, and 7, is given in table 11. For TABLE II. Statistical Study of Nitrate Formation Treatment Unlimed Unlimed Slaked lime Slaked lime Ground limestone Ground limestone Unlimed Unlimed Slaked lime Slaked lime Ground limestone Ground limestone Unlimed Unlimed Slaked lime Slaked lime Ground limestone Ground limestone Duration of growth (days) 118 118 118 118 118 118 116 116 116 116 116 116 Treatment of crop at harvest Removed .... Turned under Removed .... Turned under Removed .... Turned under Removed .... Turned under Removed .... Turned under Removed .... Turned under Removed. . . . Turned under Removed .... Turned under Removed .... Turned under Mean gain in nitrates in four months None I None / None \ 74 ± 12.3 / 51 ± 8.0 1 1 60 ± 1 6 . 1 j 13 ± 8.0 1 85 ± 24 . I f «3 ± 2.5 \ 230 ± 38 . 5 i 54 ± I o . 6 1 274 ±25.8 I 16 ± 0.8 \ ?,2 ± 8.9 j ,S7 ± 5-5 \ 244 ±25.8) 45 ± 0.8 226 ± 5.5 Net gain due to crop turned under None 74 ± 12.3 109 ±18.0 72 ±25.4 147 ±38.6 220 ±27.9 16 ± 8.9 207 ±26.4 181 ± 5.6 a given pot the nitrates at harvest were subtracted from those found after four months. The values obtained for each pair of pots treated alike at harvest were averaged, resulting in the column headed Mean gain in nitrates in Jour months. Next, for a given treatment as regards liming, Decomposition of Sweet Clover as a Green Manure 145 the mean gain in nitrates for the pot from which the crop was removed was subtracted from the value for the pot in which the material was turned under. This calculation gave the net gain in nitrates due to the green manure added. These figures appear in the last colimin of the table. The probable errors were computed according to Peter's formula. In the unlimed pots of the three-months period, no nitrates were formed following harvest, but on the contrary denitrification occurred. For the longer periods, nitrate formation took place to some extent in the unlimed pots both in 1914 and in 19 16, but the probable errors attached to the values for net gain are so large as to render them of doubtful significance. The favorable effect of lime is indicated in the table, but no significant differences appear for the two kinds. The figures indicate also that a larger net gain in nitrates is obtained by growing the crop for the longer period. The percentage of the nitrogen in the plant material added, which was changed to nitrates during the four-months period following harvest, is shown in table 12. The figures for grams of nitrogen added are taken TABLE 12. Percentage of Nitrogen Added in Crop, Ch.\nged to Nitrate in Four Months Treatment Unlimed Slaked lime Ground limestone Unlimed Slaked lime Ground limestone Unlimed Slaked lime Ground limestone Duration; Nitrogeji added of in plant growth material (days) (grams) 89 118 118 118 116 116 116 o 3216 ± 0.4125 ± o 4313 ± 0.6408 zb 0.8166 ± 0.8098 ± 0.5078 ± I . 0059 ± 0.8608 ± . 0060 .0185 .0022 0006 .0241 .0066 OIOI .0656 .0117 Net increase in nitrate nitrogen (grams) None 0.18839 d= 0.28065 ± 0.18551 ± 0.37749 ± 0.56685 ± o- 03557 ± 0.45060 ± 0.3821 1 ± .03141 04603 . 06508 . 09876 .07142 02233 07559 . 02560 Percentage nitrified None 45 67 7.89 07 ± 10.68 95 ± 10. 16 23 ± 12 17 00 ± 8 84 00 zt 4.40 80 ± 8 . 06 39 ± 3 04 from the tables in which the yields are recorded. It is asstmied that these figures, obtained b>' analysis of the crops remo\^ed, should approxi- mate the nitrogen added in the material turned under in the duplicate pots. The values for net increase in nitrate nitrogen were obtained from those showiiTig the net gain in nitrates in parts per million due to the crop turned under. The later values were changed to grams of nitrogen by taking account of the amotmt of soil present in each pot. It is realized, of course, that all of this nitrogen may not have been fonned from the ]3lant material added. However, the figures do represent the net increase in nitrate nitrogen as a result of turning under the crops. 146 Bulletin 394 and thus it seems proper to use them in computing the value for percentage nitrified. The probable error of a given value for the latter was obtained according to the formula given by Mellor/ \(x)+ b^ E = ± ^^\ in which A is the divisor with a probable error a, and B is the dividend with a probable error b. It appears unwise to make any very definite statements regarding the data in table 12, both because of the computations involved in con- structing the table and because of the large probable error attached to many of the values. It is believed, however, that the table is useful in showing the approximate amount of nitrification resulting from turning under the various crops. The values for percentage nitrified for the unlimed pots vary widely, and nothing can be said about them except that they show that the added material nitrified less rapidly than in the limed pots. There is no consistent difference shown by the two forms of lime, neither is there any evidence to show that the crop grown for the shorter period nitrified more rapidly. For the three periods of growth the figures showing the percentage nitrified for the crop treated with slaked lime agree very closely; on the other hand, the figures for the pots receiving ground limestone vary rather widely. As a rough figure to indicate the percentage of the added nitrogen nitrified in the limed pots, 50 per cent might be chosen. SUMMARY In an investigation such as the one described in* this paper, repetitions of the experiments under field conditions are desirable before general conclusions are drawn. The results obtained in the present study must be interpreted with respect to the experimental conditions maintained. This fact should be borne in mind in considering the summary given. These experiments show that sweet clover will make a satisfactory growth for use as a green manure in three or four months on a worn-out soil, provided the lime requirement is satisfied. When the crop is harv^ested at either of these periods it compares favorably in nitrogen content with other legumes, and sufficient fiber has not developed to inhibit rapid decay. Growing the crop for the longer period does not result in an increased proportion of fiber. The plant responds readily to inoculation with the appropriate organism. To secure a good stand, the seedbed ' Mellor, J. W. Higher mathematics for students nf chemistry and physics, p. 529. 1905. Decomposition of vSweet Clover as a Green Manure 147 should be compact and treated seed should be used. The use of treated seed is important also from the standpoint of economy. Treatin<,' the seed with acid increases the percentaj^je of gemiination threefold, and seed so treated does not lose its increased germinating jjower for at least ten months. Satisfying the lime requirement of the soil was found to increase the yield 50 per cent for the crop grown four months. A crop of sweet clover grown for three or four months decays rapidly when used as green manure. It was found that in the limed pots sufficient nitrates had been produced four months after harvest to account for approximately 50 per cent of the nitrogen added in the material turned under. From the standi)oint of the amount of available plant food, it is desirable that sweet clox^er, to be used as a green manure, should be grown for at least four months. The measurement of nitrate fonnation in pot experiments is subject to a large probable error. This fact is a real objection to the method as a quantitative measure of rate of decay. 148 Bulletin 394 BIBLIOGRAPHY Allen, E. R., and Bonazzi, A. On nitrification. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Technical bul. 7:1-42. 1915. Brown, P. E., and Allison, F. E. Influence of humus forming materials of different nitrogen-carbon ratios on bacterial activities. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Research bul. 36:1-30. 1916. Cameron, F. K., and Breazeale, J. F. The organic matter in soils and subsoils. Amer. Chem. Soc. Journ. 26:29-45. 1904. Carr, M. Earl. A preliminary report on the Volusia soils, their prob- lems and management. U. S. Bur. Soils. Bul. 60:1-22. 1909. Praps, G. S. Studies in nitrification. Amer. chem. journ. 29:225-241. 1903. Hill, Harry H. The effect of green manuring on soil nitrates under greenhouse conditions. Virginia Agr. Exp. Sta. Technical bul. 6:119^ ^ 153- 1915- Hopkins, Cyril G. Soil fertilit}^ and permanent agriculture, p. 1-653. 1910. Hutchinson, C. M., and Milligan, S. Green manuring experiment, 1912-13. India Agr. Research Inst., Pusa. Bul. 40:1-31. 1914. Jones, C. H. Activity of organic nitrogen as measured by the alkaline permanganate method. Journ. Indus, and eng. chem. 4:438-441. 1912. Jones, C. H., and Anderson, G. F. A procedure for separating organic ammoniates from the mineral portion of commercial fertilizers. Journ. indus. and eng. chem. 6:580-581. 1914. Lloyd, W. A. Sweet clover. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 244:589-684. 1912. Love, Harry H., and Leighty, Clyde E. Germination of seed as affected by sulphuric acid treatment. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 312:293-336. 1912. Lyon, T. Lyttleton, and Bizzell, James A. Some relations of certain higher plants to the formation of nitrates in soils. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Memoir 1:1- iii. 1913. Mi'NTz, A. Du role des engrais verts comme fumure azotee. Acad. Sci. (Paris). Compt. rend. 110:972-975. 1890. Orth, . Melilotus as green manure for heavy soils. Cited in Exp. sta. rec. 5:701-702. 1894. Front Braunschw. Landw. Ztg. 60^^:160. 1S92. Pagnoul, . Recherches sur I'azote assimilable et sur ses trans- formations dans la terre arable. Acad. Sci. (Paris). Compt. rend. 120:812-815. 1895. Paterson, John W., and Scott, P. R. Influence of certain soil con- stituents upon nitrification. Victoria Dept. Agr. Journ. 10:393-400. 1912. Decomposition of Sweet Clover as a Green Manure 149 Veitch, F. p. The estimation of soil acidity and the lime re(|uirement of soils. Amer. Chem. Soc. Journ. 24:1120-1128. 1902. Westgate, J. M., and Vinall, H. N. Sweet clover. U. S. Dept. Agr. Farmers' bul. 485:1-39. 1912. WoLLNY, E. Ueber die Thati^^keit niedriger Organismen in der Ackererde. Centbl. Agr. Chem. 13:796-814. 1884. (Abstracted from Deut. landw- Presse. vol. 10, 1883, and vol. 11, 1884.) Untersuchungen uber die Zersetzung der organischen Substanzen. Journ. Landw. 34:213-320. 1886. Wright, R. Claude. The influence of certain organic materials upon the transformation of soil nitrogen. Amer. Soc. Agron. Journ. 7: 193- 208. 1915.