*^ '%. 'Sl fl5°«. vv •^- 'o.-^^'/ V'^V ^o^'^U^' V fV*; ''n^:/^ww:^r!#tive.of53/d§t9ils/^ ^ AN ORATION DELIVERED AT BEDFORD, NEW-HAMPSHIR^, February 22, 1815, AT TEE REQ,UEST OF THE BY HUMPHREY MOORE, Minister of Milford, New-Hampshire- K Concorli : PRINTED BY GEORGE HOUGH, ^ar the Washington Benevolent Societi/ of BeSfoti, , • Feb. ..7815. \ '^ # ^ AT a meeting of the Washington Benevolent Society £» Bedford^ February 22^ 1815 — VoTED^ That Jonathan Gove, William Moore^ and John Orrjs Esquires, be a Committee to present the thanks of this Society to the Rev. Humphrey Moore, for his ingenious an J patriotic Oration^ this day delivered before them ; and rff- quest of him a copy for publication. JOSEPH COLLET, jun, Sec'ry. To the Committee of the Washington Benevolent Societtf* Gentlemen, I acknowledge , with gratitude, your indulgence and can- dor expressed in your vote of thanks ; and your politeness in requesting, for the press, a copy of the Oration, this day delivered. With confidence in your ivell meant design^ I submit it to your disposal ; regretting, that the late notice of the appointment prevented a more ample discussion of the subject. HUMPHRET MOORE. Feb. 22, 1815. TI' THERE is a propenfity in human nature to underrate prefent bleffings ; and to magnify thofe which are irrecoverably paft. Paganifm, if un- grateful to her heroes and ftatefmen wheu living, was always ready to deify them after their death. Revelation corrects thefe errors. It teaches us to be confcious of bleffings while we enjoy them; to rcfped: our benefadors while they live, and to honor their names after their death, with grate- ful remembrance. There is a delicacy in publicly celebrating the diftinguifhed deeds of men while they continue on the ftage of action ; and there is danger that the inccnfe of praife will caufe them to forget their condition, and, like Herod, refufe to give God the glory. It is duty to pay a tribute of refpe£t to our departed benefadlors. They have a claim to our remembrance, to our gratitude, to our afFedions, to our homage. We are under obligation to give honor to whom honor is due. It is ufeful to refpeft departed merit. Were people indifferent to the greateft exploits, and to the mod valuable lives, a fenfe of duty would often be too feeble to rouze the energies of the mind to undertake and effectuate arduous and dangerous enterprizes. Stimulating applications need to be made to the numbering powers of man, to throw off the torpors of animal nature ; to awaken ambition ; to concentrate the powers of human nature, and dircd: all their force to fome great and important objedt. An expedtation of the gratitude and homage of fellow beings will feldom fail to e:?^- citc to the greateft undertakings. The man, whofe name we this day honor, was an exception from moft of his fellow creatures. Such were the powers and mechanifm of his xnind, that he needed not artificial expedients to impel him to the moft generous and ufeful deeds. A love of his country and a fenfe of duty actuat- ed his foul. If his ftable mind never became giddy by the greateft applaufe ; yet he was not infenfible to the love, the gratitude, and refpcdt, which his fellow citizens repeatedly offered him on this day of his nativity. If he was not in- different to the afpcrfions of his enemies ; for even Wafhington had enemies ; yet he never was propelled from his courfe by their virulence. The powers of his great mind were too weU balanced to fludtuatc on the popular breeze ; to rife by applaufe, or fink by calumny. Often has this dav been diftinguilhed with joy on account of the birth of fo illuftrious a character ; and once, throughout this nation, has it been clouded with grief and badges of mourning at the re- membrance of his death. It is not neceftary to dwell on his characler. It is well known. The beft defcription, the higheft eulogy, cannot equal the original. To do him the greateft honor, it is neccflary to imbibe his principles and imitate his virtues. When his pohtical fentiments have been publicly vilified and denounced, it is neceifary for thofe, who believe the coiredtnefs of his fyftem of na° nonal policy, not only to ftand firm in their belief, but to endeavor to corredl the errors of public opinion, and reftore to pradice thofe principles which are the matter and fpirit of our National Conftitution. When Chriftianity had become corrupted by perverfion and innovation, and its profeffbrs had departed, not only from its fpirit, but almqft from its letter, it was not enough that individuals fhould have a correct belief of Chrif* tianity themfelves, and lament in private the apoftacy of others. At this time of general error and moral corruptnefs,a number of men of learn- ing and piety rofe, like ftars of the firft magni- tude ; united their powers and exertions, and directed them againft the errors which had been incorporated with the Chriflian religion. Under the fmiles of Providence, their exertions fucceed- ed. The clouds of error and moral darkncfs, which had been gathering for centuries, and had become exceedingly denfe by their univerfality, were not impervious to the rays of truth. Thefe champions of divinity exhibited the truths of the Golpel in their native fimplicity ; expofed error in all its deformity, and urged forward the facred caufe of divine truth. Chriftian principles and Chriftian charader were reftored to Chriftianity, and it prevailed. If we may compare the condition of human things with divine, we (hall difcovcr a refemblance between the prefent ftate of our political fyftem, andtheftate cf Chriftianity juft before the Re- ft^rmation. The principles of our government have been mifapplied ; the fyftem of national policy has been changed 3 and the Conftitution 6 ii almoft deprived of its native fpirit. Good is called evil, and evil is called good. It is right that people, who adhere to the principles of the ConlHtution, (hould unite their endeavors to cor- reO. the errors of political fentiment, and defend and fupport thofe principles which the deliverer of our country inculcated, and by which he pradifed in his official capacity. But what can a minority do to check the current of error, and deliver our languifliingConftitution from the rude liands of vifionary theorifts ? A minority, arm- ed with truth, can bear down a hoft (heltered under the covert of error. A minority, fortified in the recefTes of the Conftitution, will prevail, and repel every aggreflion. There is a crifis in public fentiment. When incorrect principles have had their courfe, and for a feafon have daz- zled and bewildered the human mind, reafon wakes from its flumbers ; perceives the deception ; throws oiFthe fhackles of infatuation; regains its authority ; and repels a kgion of falfe principles. It was by a combination of wifdora and energy that this inf.int colony rofe in majefty againft Britifli innovation, and prevailed againft a hoft of invaders and of unjuft principles. By a union of fimilar wifdom and energy, we may, at a favor- able juadlure, check the fpirit of innovation in our own government, and reftore an equilibrium between the different parts of the nation. The fuccefs which now attends various aftbciations of the more regular part of fociety for the fuppref- fion of certain prevailing vices, affords great en- couragement to form aflbciations to remove ot coumera6l the political evils we fuller. Our National Conftitution has within itfell means of defence and fupport. Conftitutional meafures only need to be ufed to prefei ve it from violation or from dcftrudion. When a portion ofthe community unite for this benevolent and falutary purpofe, profefs their defign, ad: openly, obferve thcmfelves the principles which they at- tempt to defend and fupport, but few will repro- bate their defign, or their meafures, excepting thofewho feek their intereftin bafe principles,orin the fubverfion of the Conftitution. If a union of individuals, to reftore the Conftitution to its original tone and fpirit, excite alarm and oppo- fition, what fhall be faid of the combination of thofe, whofe objed: it is to pervert the principles of the Conftitution, or to deftroy the whole fyftem ? One ofthe principles ofthe Conftitution, and alfo of the man whofe name we venerate, was the liberty of fubjedls to infpe£t the meafures and conduct of rulers, and reprefent them in the language of truth. Wafhington never feared the inquifition of the public. He never feared a dK- clofure of his official charader. Thofe rulers only fear the public tribunal, whofe public characters will not bear the teft of examination ; whofe of- ficial conduct does not coincide with the fpirit of the Conftitution. Thofe only are oppofed to the inveftigation and difclofure of official charac- ters, who are confcious, that if they be weighed in an equal balance, they will be found wanting. The liberty of fpeech, the liberty of declaring the truthjis among the firft principles of a Republican Gonftiturion. If this be denied, the whole fyf- tern is denied. If this be denied, let tyranny be perfected ; incapacitate the organ of fpeech to ut- ter the wrongs it fufFcrs. Freedom of inquiry into official condudl, and freedom of fpeech, pro- duce a mofl happy effect upon rulers. While their paffions tend to propel them from the orbit of official duty, the'expreffion of public fenti- ment, like the gravitating principle, counteradls their eccentric propenfity, and attrads them to the path in which they were deftined to move. Another principle of the Conftitution, which is juft and republican in its nature, is the equal rights of citizens. This principle is obferved when all of certain qualifications, eafy to be ob- tained, are equally eligible to offices of honor and emolument ; when the laws equally protedi the property, the reputation, and the lives of in- dividuals ; when the bleffings and the burdens of government arc diftributed according to the refpedtive privileges of individuals. The time has been when eledlions were managed on the principle of equal rights. The grand inquiry was for men of wifdom and integrity to fill import- ant offices. Then there was fcope for ambition to feek the neceflfary qualifications. Then local prejudices fcarcely exifted, and perfonal partialities were of fmall extent. At prefent we have the forniy and little but the form of freedom in our elections. A few, from local prejudice, or from perfonal attachment, affiime the right of nom- ination ; and the general mafs of citizens, without knowledge of characters propofed, feel the dire neceffity of feconding their motion in order to fecure men in office of their own political name* In this manner a few enterprizing, ufurpirig in- dividuals diftribute, as they pleafc, the higheft offices in the State. In the ele<5tion of the higheft officers of the nation, local prejudice and local intereft have fhorn the principle of equal rights of all its privi- leges. The fouthern fedlion of our country has, fince the adoption of the Conftitution, almoft wholly monopolized the right of the higheft national offices. That felfifhnefs and ambition fliouldinftigatea part of a nation togainanafcend- ency, and to poffefs the prerogatives of power, is natural. But that the remaining part fhould aid ihcm in climbing the lofty afcent,and obfequiouf^ ly offer their fhoulders to fupport their enormous, their oppreffive weight, is a violation of the firft law of human nature* Can genius be born only in our fouthern clime ? Can virtue and wifdom fiourifli only under an almoft vertical fun ? Can republican principles in their purity be found on- ly in that fection of our country, whofe atmof- phere is darkened by the fablehue of Africa's fons ; and whofe lords learn the firft principles of gov- ernment from the fcourge they wield ? Has the God of nacure faid to the waters of the Potowmac, wafh ye on fouthern bank the foil of rulers j but on northern fide the foil of fubjedls ? Impartial heaven has not made this wide diftindtion. The frigid air of thefe northern States braces the frame, nerves the arm, and gives at the fame time firm- nefs and elafticity to the human mind. Walh- ington, who had collected all the excellencies of his own climate, felt new impulfe when he breath- 2 li- ed the colJ, the free air of New-England, We may, if we pleafe, boaft of the liberty of elec- tions ; the freedom of choofing our own rulers. But there is no doubt that an heir apparent to the Piefidcncy is now decreed by the dilpofcrs of the higheft offices of the nation. We have liberty to run over the electioneering ground ; to caft our votes for whom we pleafe ; and we have alfo the liberty of feeing that the decree is fulfilled, and that we have run in vain. There is but little difference in refpect to real freedom, whether fouthern planters give this country, from their own numbers, a chief magiftrate, or whether a foreign nation afTumes the right of doing the same friendly office. There is but little difference in refpect to the principle of equal rights, whether the lucceffion to the Preiidency be eftablifficd by the will of a certain fection of our country, and within its own limits, or whether the fucceffion be made hereditary by an article of the Conftitu- tion. In a widely extended territory like ours, it may be expected, and it will be found,that there is dif- ference of views and feelings refpecting national policy ; and difference and collifions of intereft. The reprefentation from the different parts of this country vi^as originally defigned to prevent this evil, and preferve the equal rights of the dif- ferent parts of the nation. The late meafures of the National Government have borne with un- equal preffure on the northern States. Our rep- refentation in the National Government urge the principles of the Conftituiion. They lift tiieir voioes in behalf of their injured conftituents.. IS "fhey fpeak the language of wifdom and of free- men. But they have no weight in the councils. Fov years they have had no weight. As well might this part of the nation not be reprefented^ as their reprefentation (hould not be heard. If the New-England States are not refpedted in the councils of the nation, they are highly refpcded asa fource of revenue, as an objedt of taxation. It affords fome fupport, fome encouragement, that our fenatorial influence has not become quite extinct. It is a principle of our National Conftitution, which Wafhington honored by his fignature, that " the Congrefs fhall have power to provide and maintain a navy." At the time of the adoption of the Conftitution, and during thofe few fucceed- ing years in which its principles were obferved, commerce was in high repute. It was the fare- well inftrudion of the American fage, that " the United States fhould look to the means, and fet about the gradual creation of a navy, fo that a future war of Europe might not find our com- merce in the fame unproteded ftate astheprefent." For a fhort feafon, his advice was refpeded. An infant navy was launched from its cradle. With the emblem of the Conftitution, holden J3y the powerful hand of Hercules, it commanded refped:. it gave flattering evidence, that the time was faft haftening, that America could ride v*rith fafety on the broad highway of nations. At this period, our commerce, not with ftanding fome lawlefs and predatory aggreffions, iiourilhed beyond the mod fanguine expedation. Revenue flowed into the national treafury ; and our yeomanry, the m^fs 12 of the nation, rapidly increafed in wealth. At this golden feafon, " the prince of the power of the air" glanced from the Eaftern Continent acrofs the Atlantic ; thruft himfelf into this American Eden ; gave our citizens foreign and forbidden fruit. They fancied that their eyes were opened; and they chofe difciples of a mafter, different from Wafhington, to order the deftinies of this nation. The adminiftration, which fucceeded that of Wafhington's principles, foon began to reduce to pradice their new philofophy. They laid it down as a Conftitutional principle, that they had power to provide and maintain a navy. By their new method of reafoning, they inferred from this premife, that thty had power to destroy it* No fooner was the conclufion drawn, than the deftrudtive work was executed. If, after this date, predatory aggreflions were multiplied upon our commerce, the evil effed may be accounted for without recourfe to falfe philofophy. The evil efFe£t proves the error of withdrav^ing pro- tedion from commerce, and the danger of offer- ing temptation without referving means of efcape or refi fiance. The adminiftration, pleafed with the fucccfs of their firft experiment, applied again to the fub- jett their new mode of reafoning, and inferred, that if they had power to destroy the navy^ they had, of courfe, power to destroy commerce. Avail- ing themfelves of that article of the Conftitution which empowers them to *' regulate commerce with foreign nations, and with the feveral States,"- they remanded our vellcls into port ; prohibitecj intercGurfe with foreign nations ; and, left a fparjc of commercial enterprize fhould remain, ihey prohibited our velTels from traverfmg our own waters ; from going from port to port, on our own coaft, and carrying the ftafF of life to thofe of our citizens who had not the means of fuh- fiftence. Is this the regulation of commerce for "which they were empowered ? If regulation fig- nifies extirpation, they have fcrupuloufly obferved both the letter and fpirit of the Conftitution. The Conftitution empowers the National Gov- ernment " to provide for organizing, arming, find difciplinuig the militia; and for governing fuch part of them as may be employed in the fer- vice of the United States ;" but it makes certain refervations of power to the States refpedlively. The prefent adminiftration have attempted to ex- tend the operations of the militia beyond the limits fpecified by the Conftitution ; and they have attempted to afliime an authority over them equally unconftitutional and arbitrary. Had not jhis northern part of our country had a juft and proportionate weight in the Senatorial branch of our National Government, there is no doubt that the unconftitutional and arbitrary affumptions of our National reprefentation refpedting the com- mand of the militia would have become a law ; and deprived the States of their individual fecu- rity and fovereignty. This attempt at arbitrary power is the more noticeable, becaufe it was fup- ported by a great portion of our Reprefentatives. Attempts at innovation in our Government ought to be checked in embryo, left tliey come to the birth, and prove to be a monftrous production. The Conftitution requires, that '^ the Unitad States Ihall guarantee to every State in the Union a republican form of government ; andjhall pro- ie£i each of them from invafion.^^ As the National Government embraces all the States in the com- pafs of its authority, it alfo embraces them in the arms of its protection. If it commands their aid and refources, it returns them defence and fecurity. If claims and obligations were not mutual, and benefits v/ere not reciprocal between the individual States and the United States, no advantage v.'ould arife from the bonds of con- federation. In the prefent confliO: our adminif- tration has not afforded the individual States, efpecially the States of New-England, thofe means of repelling invafion which the Conftitu- tion requires. Thefe States v/ere neceffitated to draw from their own refources men and money for their own defence and prote6lion ; and the adminiftration refufe to indemnify them for the expenfe occafioned by their own delinquency. Our ports might have been laid under contribu- tion, or in allies ; our sea coaft might have been ravaged from one extremity to the other, for aught the National Government has done to repel the invafion of the enemy. While they were dcvfing ways and means for defence, but efpecially for offence, the States adually ufed the ways and means for repelling aggreffion, and for their fecurity. If the adminiftration had it not in their power to proted the States, it was becaufe they had dried up a great proportion of the refources of the nation, and had diverted the remainder into a forced chmncl. If they yhaygig riOt In their heart to protect them, perfidy and treafon blacken their names. While they refufed to proted commerce, and would not fufFer it to protect itfelf, and left our fea ports almoft naked before the enemy, their force and vigilance were adlively direded to defend the fandiiy of their obnoxious meafures, and proted the port of the cuftom houfe officer. If the adminiftration negleded to afford neceffary means of defence to the States, it was reafonably expeded that they would proted the:- diftrid over which they had exclufive jurifdic- tion ; the depofitory of public records and public property ; the place rendered dear by the name which it bore. But the fagacious enemy too well knew that the weakeft part of our nation was its beat^y and the moft vulnerable part of our country was its heart. With a fmall force they entered our capital in the third year of the war ; found its protedors — not there ; and the place peaceably in their own pofTeiliGn. Was not this enough to gratify Britifh pride ? Was it no£ enough to deftroy the munitions of war ? The enemy, as if enraged by the eafe of conqueft, deftroyed alike the monuments of tafle and the implcGients of hoftility. As long as this Gothic outrage upon civilized warfare fixes a ftigraa upon Eritifli arms, it will tarnifli the glory of this nation, which chofe men to proted them, who invited the conflld ; provided fmall means of defence ; made l^h rcfiftance ; and fled in an hour of danger. O ye rulers ! ye had courage to- declare hoftillties ; but your hearts failed at the ight of arms 1 i6 Our Conflitution gives power to Congrefs '^ t5 declare war ; to raife and fupport armies." But it did not contemplate that they would declare war without the moft preffing caufe. The genius of a Republican Gorernmenr, and of a republican people, is that of peace and defence. It is difficult for a Republican Government fo to mould the public fentiment as to produce a gen* eral intereft and cngagednefs in an invafive war. If the adminiftration feel a peculiar partiality fot* a neighboring territory of a foreign nation, the people in general, not being interefted in their views, are flow to catch their feelings, and back- ward to expofe their lives to gratify the ambition, or to fulfil the dreams, of their rulers. It is diffi- cult for a Republican Government to concentrate the energies of a free people fo as to profecute a foreign war, in which they do not feel intsrefted; it is difficult to make thofe quick and rapid oper-^ ations, which are neceflary to infure conqueft. When the genius of the adminiftration is differ- ent from the genius of the people, they will evade their meafurcs ; they will withhold their refources; the fpirit of warfare, if it have any exiftencc in the people, will languifli for want of fupport. While adminiftration contends with its fubjedts for want of co-operation, oft'enfive war drags heavily on. When the people feel unwilling to enter the lifts of warfare which has been declared, their Government feci a neceffity of ufing more ener- getic meafures than thofe which are confiftent with republican principles ; and aflurne an au- thority for profecuting their objed, which the 2 7 Conftitution had not delegated to them. Th® people feel the infringement upon their rights 5 and they will not fecond the operations of theic rulers. The latter evade the principles of the Couftitution ; the former evade the laws of theic Government. When adminiftration becomes ar- bitrary, and fubjeds become difobedient, the fa- bric of Republican Government trembles on its bafe. Thefe obferv^ations characSterize the war which our National Government declared againft Great- Britain. It is not neceflary at this time to exam- ine the weight of the caufes of the war. It is fufficient to {zlj^ that no new kind of aggreflioa had been made againfi: us ; that we had fufFcred the like infringement upon our rights under every adminiftration of aur Government. But not- withftanding the infringements on our maritime rights which we fuffered, we reapt a rich harveft on the field of naval enterprize. If, during a few of the laft years, inftances of aggreffion increafed, it was in eonfequence of an increafed colliiion of nations, and the deftrudion of our own navy. Whether the depredations on our commerce were an adequate caufe of war, or not, the firft, fecondj, and third adminiftration of our Government: thought it not lefs for our borwr, and more foe our interest i to obtain what redrefs for our griev- ances we could by amicable negociation, and pais over the reft without recourfe to retaliation. It was referved to the foperior genius of the prefenc adminiftration to difeover that we could not fuficr thefe aggrellions, and preferve our independence, . 5 i8 It was refervcd for the prefent adminiftrat'ion to take by conqueft vaft trads of Britifli territory on the north, and humble the pride of England on the ocean. At the time of the declaration of war, it is pre- fumable there was a majority of the free popula- tion of this country decidedly againft the meafure. To give an account of the unprepared ftate of the nation to commence hoflilitles ; the difficulty of raifmg troops ; the backwardnefs of the people to co-operate with Government ; a feries of difafters; and in the third year of the war, not one impor- tant ftation occupied on Britifli ground ; would be fome outlines of the prefent war. But to do juftice to the American name, we cheerfully ob- ferve, that battles have been fought on land and water, which have plucked the laurel from Britifh valor, and planted it on the American brow. Thefe deeds of bravery give evidence of the fuperior quality of republican blood ; and prove what this nation might do in an expedient caufe with a con- centration of all its phyfical force. Wafliington, in his farewell advice to his coun- trymen, cautions them againft foreign partialities and antipathies; againft foreign influence, and againft an illiberal and unequal commercial inter- courfc with different nations. His fentiments were the fentiments of the Conftitution. But it does appear that his advice on thefe points has been difregarded ; and that the fpirit of the Con- ftitution has not been obferved. Why did not our Government, to preferve national indepen- dence, declare war againft France ? She too had made depredations on our commerce. Why did 19 our Government, while ail Europe was convulfed by war, adopt commercial meafures which had an unequal bearing on conflidting nations ? To what caufe can we attribute this illiberal policy, but to foreign partiality and foreign influence ? The hiftory of the proceedings of our National Government affords abundant evidence, that from its commencement foreign partiality and foreign influence have had place in the councils of our nation. Foreign principles have been imported into this country, and they have found a foil too congenial. The political evils we fufFer may be traced to this corrupt fource. The father of our country cautioned us not to "interweave our defliny with that of any part of Europe, nor entangle our peace and profperity in her toils." Let the late proceedings of the ad- minifl:ration decide whether they have been adtu" ated by this principle on this fubjedt. In the ne- gociation between our plenipotentiaries and the minifl:ers of the Britifli Government before the late fubverfion of the French empire, our envoys were infl:ruded to infifl: unon this principle, thai our flag should protect our crew ; and that the Brit- ish nation should not^ by their long accustomed claim of search J violate this principle. This prin- ciple they reprcfented to be infeparably connected with our national independence ; and they laid it down (^as a sine qua non) as an indifpenfable preliminary conccffion, before they would treat for peace. This had long been a favorite point, a deep rooted principle in our adminifl:ration; and the time had now arrived, when Europe was in commotion, for carrying it into complete €ffe •- '**o< ; % -^^0^ o. • ^^' r R S»'« '<^. ^"^ ^.jMJK^o j». i: _ ^^ ^.^^^ rs^""^^-- --V^^* ^ b--, % .*« .-^^A'-. \/ ,-^\ %^** ..>«Va-". * ^CpV ,^ ,<^V . ^ • . "^^ -O^ . o « . - ''•*•- >^ ..' •. -^^ W€RT AO, Mjrci- »D"I 198