;FV5-X '86 v^ pennuliffe* pH83 E 458 C^1H^o\ver is not found there, clearly and visibly found there? "The Constitution declares that the laws of Congress, jiassed in pursuance of the Constitution, shall be the supreme law of the land. It dechires, also, with ecpial plainness and precision, that the judicial power of the United States shall extend to every case arising under the laws of Congress. Here is a law, then, which is declared to be supreme, and here is a jiower established which is to interpret the law. Now, Sir, how has the gentleman met this? Suppose the Constitution to be a compact, yet here are its terms, and how does the gentleman get rid of them ? He cannot argue the seal off the bond, nor the words out of the instrument. Here they are; what answer does he give them? None in the world, Sir, except that the eftect of this would be to place the States in a condition of inferiority; from the nature of things, there being no superioi-, the parties must be their own judges. The gentleman says, if there be such a power of final decision in the general government, he asks for the grant of the power. Well, Sir, I show him the grant. I turn him to the very words. I show him that the laws of Congress are made supreme, and that the judicial power extends, by express words, to the interpretation of these laws. Instead of answering this, he retreats into the general reflection that it must result from the nattire of things, that the States being, as he afKrms, parties, must judge for themselves. " Sir, the people of the United States have at no time, in no way, directly or indirectly authorized any State Legisla- ture to construe or interpret their high instrument of gov- ernment, much less to interfere, by their own power, to arrest its course and ojieration. If the people in these n'sjK'cts liad (loiic, otlierwise than they have done, their Con- stitution could neither have been preserved, nor would it 27 have been worth preservini;-. An.l if its plain provisions shall now be