mm m :a Wm M ^m 1 c r f < V cc 'ice cc c <«: ccc ted <3 t c c C IP OL.i«^ cc: c c «or c r S < *< t c -c « < c cc cccc «_c < < < LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, PRESENTED BV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. cC <• << (.< C« C(( ^^< < «^ * << c c < r.CC ^ c* c -^'C(cr ■ Cc c C^Mk-'5^^:i ^ 'St:fc arty; and in the Southern Republicau States the old Confederate arm}', reorganized in derringer cUdis, is engaged in a deadly "-still hunt" for the posses- sion of power that "means business" in an eminent de- gree. "Wlien (lermany crushed the militaiy Empire of France she demanded an indemnity for her trouble. The con- (pieror gathered the s[)oil with the glory. The American kepublic trampled down the Southern Confederacy, and tlie Confederates, revived and restored to citizenship, feel that justice requires in their behalf a reversal of all the precedents of warfare, and are coniidently requiring as a peace-ottering from those who overcame them, compensa- tion for losses suffered, — the infliction upon the conqueror of a tine for the arty has any principle, we untler.Maufl it to be that the Southern Confederacy w^as ri|rht and the Xatiomil Government wrong in the liegin- ning, the course, and the end of the war. If the National Hoklier \vuh u " trespasser" wherever he touched the sacred soil of a Sovereign Southern Slate that, in the exercise of WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. her highest capacity, had withdrawn from the Union — and I understand there is distinguished Democratic authority for this proposition in the State of New York — we can not, of course, get out of the responsihility of paying for all the mischief done — without sneaking out of it, and we must not do that. The cloud of the Southern claims is not spectral — it is not a ghost that will vanish when you speak to it ; but it is the overshadowing reality of the political campaign about to close. If we put the Consolidated Southern Confeder- acy in possession of the National Government, we must expect the Southern claims to be allowed, and that they will be pressed to payment as a debt of honor. This is not a phantom danger. It is a plain business fact. It is the fruit of the logic, if it has not the flavor of the literature, of the Democratic party. Now that organization has no iixed principles, if we ex- cept the general one that the late war was the result of the rebellion of the North against the Divine authority of the South — and in the absence of this special illumination of our history, the South has no grievance for which the Na- tional Government is responsible. Why then the appear- ance of the Solid South in the St. Louis Convention? Why the total indifference in that Convention of the mass of Southern delegates to the terms of the platform and the names of the candidates, save only as they might promise success, and power, signifying in its last analysis money ? The Virginian theory of the Constitution once interfered with appropriations by Congress for local enterprises, but a change has passed over the spirit of the Southern dream ; and we do not hear of the constitutional lawyers of Vir- ginia objecting to the appropriation of the uncounted mill- ions wanted for the James Eiver Canal, the climax of which is a tunnel through the Allegheny Mountains seven miles in length, where there would be the total lack of water that in the old story spoiled the mill-seat. We do not hear that the Southwestern experts in the ancient mys- teries of the Constitution find any difficulty in taxing the 8 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. people of the improtected ovei-flowed lands of the Wabash aiul White Rivers of Indiana, and the Scioto and Miami Rivers of Ohio, to build Mississippi levees ; or that they r.-'iuire any stronger argument for constructing a Southern ra.itie liailroad than that avast sum was wasted on the Northern Pacitic line. The Solid South seeks money through jobs and claims that we must pronounce preposterous, not only with eager energy, but with perfect sincerity in the opinion that the money belongs in all fairness and righteousness to the Southern people. Tlie South has suftered deeply — was desolated and ira- l>overished by the war. The distress of her people has been great, and in defeat and poverty they were entitled to our best sympathy and kimlness and help. It is sorrow- ful that tiiere has been a lack of healing statesmanship. We are all heavy losers through that misfortune. There was, thougli, when the military part of the war was over, a Statesman in the White House, and he was assassinated. Then a Southern man became President, and our first trouble with him was to reduce the j)lethora of his passion for hanging the traitors he knew — perhaps too well, if not wisely. We followed the precedent of elevating to our highest civil otfice the most successful of our Generals, and he at !':i-t has ever since been regretful that he accepted the .-iiuiition. Now, I am not of those who have been con- strained by a sense of partisan duty to incessantly applaud the Administration. I wanted a change long ago, but I have been in thorough sympathy and agreement with the President in one particular. He has been in favor of the United States of America ; and when charged with unkind- !ic>s of spirit toward the Southern people, we may well remember tliat it certainly did not appear in the terms he gave Lee at Appomattox, or in his leport, at the close of the war, on the operations of the armies under his com- njand, in wliidj he paid a glowing compliment to Southern •soldiers; and it is pertinent to inquire what encouragement WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 9 the President and the generous sentiments of the Xorth had, in the treatment that the Southern people gave their General Lougstreet when he was appointed to an office of honor and profit ? I do not propose to sing the songs of praise of the Ad- ministration, or to cease from criticism; but it is only fair to say that if the South has been infested by and suffered from the Carpet-bagger and Scalawag, the f^ult is not who]]y or chiefly that of the Administration, or of the people of the States that conquered a peace and saved the Union. And while I claim to be as independent as a jour- nalist can be who is in favor of one side when there are but two sides, I am not in any case in favor of putting the Southern Confederacy on top of the United States. I am completely willing that the people of the South should manage their own atlairs, in their own way, "sub- ject only to the Constitution of the United States;" but I wish it understood, when I say "people of the South," that I mean all the people, and recognize no natural right of any race to rule. I would that the people of the South had given more attention to their own affairs. But when the old Confederate politicians prepare, with a crusade of hate and reign of terror, the united South, and propose to "occupy and possess" all the departments of ISTational authority, and to exact from the people at large indemnity for the conquest of the Confederacy, it is something far more menacing to all of us than when the same politicians twenty years ago attempted, not for the sake of slavery, but in the love of the political power associated with slavery, to nationalize the peculiar institution ; — and this grim jjortent of a sectional caste, taking the form of the Solid South, and the name of the Democratic party, should be confronted and overwhelmed by the Solid Xorth — not in hate and tiuy, not under banners of blood, but soberly, discreetly, in self-defense, and in the interests of the public peace and the general welfare ; and so clear is the issue, that it is a shame there is a doubt about the vote of a single county from Maine to Oregon. 10 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. In tlio verv dawn of tlio promise of brighter times of business, in tlie white light of tlie statesniiinlike utterances of the Republican candidate for the Presidency in his letter of acceptance of the Cincinnati nomination, arises the dark- ness of the Solid South ; and unw^holesome sectional dis- sensions have characterized the campaign of this year that we had hoped would be memorable only for happiness — and for the cordial universal celebration of the reality of the Proclamation — of the revered inscription of Independ- ence Bell : Of liberty, throughout the land and unto all the inhabitants thereof. "We are told with ostentation that the whole South has accepted the situation, and is reconstructed forever more. The politicians who dragged the people of that section into the Confederacy^ terrorizing the whites — who opposed them at that time as they do the blacks in this — are convinced that they made a mistake in running away from the Na- tional Capital when they held majorities in both houses of Congress. They have ascertaitied that they took the wrong road to reach the supremacy that they believed was their birthright. They propose, therefore, leaving vain regrets for errors past, to remain in tlie Union, and use the Demo- cratic party, their steadfast servant in other days, for their lixed purposes. They will not again flee from the fort, throwing away in imbecile fury the weapons they hold, that they may return in the pride of their nakedness to storm Its gates. Their desires are as strenuous and their aims as far-reach- ing as ever, but they have acquired a better appreciation of means to their ends. They prefer the inside of things to the outside, and on all questions involving bread and butter, there is an enlargement of understanding and an aptitude in adjustment. We are asked what is the motive of these men, and wiicrein is danger to be expected? The abolition of slavery is complete and irreversible! Wiiat shall take its place as a basis of operations for political enterprises of great pith and moment? The answer is, Southern Claims take the WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH, 11 place of slavery as a huge and dominating sectional inter- est. They mean more money than there was in all the ne- groes in America. It is the flagrant intention that those claims shall ultimately inclnde the slaves emancipated by the sword, and that there shall be added to them the value, according to the estimates of the owners, of the cotton de- stroyed, and the corn, green and dry, in the fields and the cribs, that was consumed by men and beasts in the National service. Then we see coming, like a cloud of grasshoppers, myriads of thousand-dollar mules and pianos, and an end- less array of velvet parlor furniture and rosewood fence- rails. The National debt has a conservative influence. Horace Greeley said there was no danger that the debt would ever be repudiated; it was " too big to be repudiated." AVhy, these Soutiiern claims are bigger than the National debt. They are the cement of the Solid South. They include the losses of the South from the begining— interest calculated on all the items. There isn't a Congressman, from the Po- tomac, along the Ohio and the Missouri to the Kansas line, and down to the Gulf and the Rio Grande, who would dare, as a candidate for re-election, to oppose these claims. They are the sacred thing of the Solid South. Still, slavery is abolished ! It is abolished, no doubt, so far as the so-called patriarchal relation goes. Individuals will no longer own men, women, and children. The auction block for property in man is overthrown, but it is proposed to make the persons who have been emancipated from the control of masters, Slaves of the States. With this view, the blacks have already been disfranchised by the process of the pocket-pistol in all States in which they are in the majority', with the possible exception of South Carolina; and the glitter of the bayonet in that State as opposed to the derringer, is the token for tremblings and pertubations touchins: the Constitution. These were not felt when United States Marshals called for troops to catch fugitive slaves, but we became accustomed to them in the days when the last Democratic President could find no warrant in law 1'2 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. to resist the seizure of National property by States. The camion of South Carolina thundered upon the Star of the West wlieu carrying provisions to Fort Sumter, and the steamer put out to sea, leaving our soldiers to starve, but the Democratic President could not discover in the Consti- tution that it would do to shoot back. There occurred a change in the administration, and while the Confederate cannon were volleying on the fort, the people gave the Con- stitution an interpretation that should abide with it forever. When the war was over, there was no hanging, no con- tiscation of the estates of the architects of rebellion. IsTot- withstaiuling the assassination of Lincoln, the spirit of the Xorth was kindly. There was tenderness of heart in the victors toward the vanquished. After some delays that were unfortunate, there was reconstruction, substantially upon the basis of general amnesty and impartial sulfrage. The one condition exacted before the restoration of the Confederates to the political rights they had thrown away was, that the emancipated slaves should be enfranchised. Now, the bcluiviour of the frecduien, while there were armies deciding, in the high debates of battlefields, what their future was to be, should have earned the gratitude and the affection of the Southern whites. Scenes of servile insurrection were not added to the horrors of civil war. The black citizens have not been liuiltless. They have looked too much to the Government and too little to them- selves; but their education was more expensive than in- structive. Still, they know some essential things wonderfully well. (Jnceapoorold field haiul in Kentucky put the case in a few words. It was during the agitation of the " amendment " that was 8Ui)p08ed to secure his race the right of suftVage. lie was asked in a tone of fierce derision what he intended to do with himsullwlien he became a voter, a:id he answered, with religious solemnity : " AVell, nuirster, if I gets to vote, I will vote as near as I know for them that stood for me." That is what is the matter with the black voters. They arc the faithful friends of the American Nation, and so far as they know (and they have a pretty keen instinct where WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 13 the}^ have not knowledge), they are against the restoration, to the position of a ruling class, of the Confederate poli- ticians by whom they, and their masters too, were held in servitude. "When the Confederate Generals surrendered, the grand army of the D nited States was disbanded. The everlasting reconstruction of the white people of the South was ac- cepted as accomplished. The negro armed with the ballot — the poor man's proper weapon to defend his humble but precious and sacred interests — was to take care of himself. The practical proposition of the Solid South, and the leading idea of the Democratic party, is to-day that the old Confederate army may be reorganized in a private wa}^, with concealed weapons — or with displayed arms if their arrogance is so excited that they scorn mere pocket-pistol warfare — and that this armed force may disfranchise the blacks at pleasure, choose Electors, and elect Congressmen and Legislatures, and take away from the General Govern- ment the only guarantee that in the magnanimous mood of unqualified conquest was exacted. If Confederate desperadoes may thus possess Congress and the Presidency too, and the l^ational authorities have no rights that men armed with derringers are bound to re- spect, we ought not to be surprised or make any protest w'hatever, if called upon to pay the bills of the once dear departed but now reinstated Confederacy, even if they amount to more than the French indemnity. And we may conclude, with the rehabilitation of the Confederacy, and its extension to our remotest frontiers, slavery, abolished as a personal matter, is re-established as a State institution ; that a system of State servitude, to be called apprentice- ship, or sonie other and softer name, will speedily be enacted and enforced in the interests of Southern peace ; for if the reign of terror is to be perpetuated and its scope is to be National, it will be necessary to regulate it by law, that inducements to assassination may not be so imperative as to cause the massacre of a race. If we must accept this as the prerequisite of peace in the land of the derringer, our gain in the overthrow of the 14 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. Soutberu Confederacy hy force of arms would be tbe privi- leo-e of paying.tbe damages inflicted upon tbe Confederates, in addition to bearing our own burdens; wbile tbe loss of tlie pobticians of tbe Soutb would be tbat of tbe ob- ligation to pay tbeir own bills; and tbey would gain an enlargement of tbe Confederate domain to tbe remotest National limits — a territory wider, witb prerogatives ricber tban tbey ever dared to dream of winning by successful war. " Peace batb ber victories no less renowned tban War. Tbe rivers of West Virginia unite ber witb Obio, and tbe mountains divide ber from Old Virginia, but in tbe late election neither tbe rivers nor tbe mountains could retain ber, and sbe gave berself utterly to tbe ancient regime. Siie bad no reason to complain of tbe Republican party witbin ber borders. AVbile tbe Republicans were in power ber attairs were well managed. Wben tbe war was over and gentle peace bad fully returned, tbe Confederates were all cnfrancbised and tlie people bad a " cbange." Every- tbiiig was lovely and of good report, but, as usual, tbe Democratic party bad to come into power. It was " tbe gaunt wolf waiting at tbe door" of tbe State. But tbere is no reform to speak of in connection witb tbe " cbange." On tbe contrary, West Virginia bas been as badly governed ever since as sbe could well bave been if tbe Carpet-bag- gers were in autbority and tbe Scalawags bad given their whole attention to i>ublic business. Just now, if tbe peo- ple tbere wanted a cbange and reform and econom}-, they would bave to try tbe Republican paity ; and, otber tilings being equal, tbey would do it gladly, for tbere is nothing tbat 80 cures a State of longing for Democratic reformation as a brief trial of it. It was not love of tbe Southern Confederacy, or of the Democratic party, per se, tiiat fixed tbe place of West Vir- ginia in tbe Tilden colunm. It was the overbearing influ- ence of the Southern War Claims tbat controlled the State. Here" is an extract of a letter from Grafton, West Virginia, stating the facts, — and I bog tbat you will give WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 15 it your most considerate attention, for it is from a citizen of intelligence and responsibility. He says : " In the payment of such claims (Southern War Claims), West Virginia is more largely interested, in proportion to population, than any other State ; and it is because it was believed these claims would be paid by the United States if Tilden is elected, that the State voted so largely Demo- cratic the other day. This is the secret of the result ; this is the bottom fact of the situation in this State. " In all the strong Democratic counties there are men of influence who have claims. They have worked for Dem- ocratic success as statesmen with Texas bonds in their pockets, worked for annexation and for the §10,000,000 bill. ' There's millions in it.' Right here in this town I know of men who have these claims for property destroyed or captured, who worked most earnestly and voted for the Democratic ticket on the avowed ground that a Democratic success in the United States would assure the payment of their claims. But for their influence, the Repubhcan gain here would have been even greater than it was. One of these ' claims' is for between seven and eight thousand dol- lars, for property destroyed aud taken by the Union army ; another is for similar damages and for fifteen slaves set free. And so on, all around, from hen-roosts to immortal intellects. Every one of the owners of these 'claims' is an ex-rebel sympathizer, at best. "You can judge, hence, how it is in the strong rebel counties, where hatred of the Union is not disguised, and where pretty much everybody is thirsting for revenge. There the enthusiasm in behalf of ' Southern claims,' in behalf of making the Yankee pay all the losses of the South after all. is simply irrepressible. It is not attempted to be concealed, as it is here. And it is this which swept all the frontier counties like a tornado — only this and noth- ing more." The writer of this letter inclosed with it a note of iden- tification, and used this language : " There is not the slightest doubt in my mind that I here state the true reason for the great Democratic victory in it) WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. this State. The immense danger thus threatened by the Southern claims is not at all appreciated by the North. If it were, there would be no possibility of Tilden getting a single Northern State." During the recent canvass in Ohio, when the Democrats noticed tlie question of the Southern war claims, they, as a rule, asserted that there was a constitutional amendment that prohibited the payment of those claims. You are aware that the fourth clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the only one that has any relation to the subject, and that it re- fers to the payment of debt " incurred in aid of insurrec- tion or rebellion against the United States," and to " com- pensation for slaves," and is not applicable at all to claims for damages. War claims are among the worst results of war, for they can not be cured like wounds inflicted in the shock of bat- tle. They are cancerous, and of ceaseless malignancy in growth. We must be at pains to see of what items those we are discussing consist, and how they develop like tu- mors. Here is — " Claim No. 3,107. {Before the Claims Commissioners and (Jisallowed.) January 18, 1875. Referred to the Committee on War Claims, and ordered to be printed. Marie P. Evans, of Orleans Parish, Louisiana. Total amount claimed in orig- inal petition, S272,590 ; in amended petition, $495,355." Here are speciiications, as follows: No. 1. 82.'> hhds. centrifugal sugar, of average weight of 1,300 lbs. net per hhd., being 1,072,.")U0 lbs., at 2;3c. per lb $268,125 No. 2. 400 bbl.s. golden sirup (molasses), at 40 galls, per bbl., making 10,000 galls., at $1.50 per gall 24,000 500 bbls. sugar-house molasses, at 40 galls, per bbl., making 20,000 galls., at ?1 20,000 No. :}. ],(M)Ufnii>ty bbls., at $2 2,000 No. 4. 3,0(MJ cords of dry wood, at $5 15,000 No, 5. 02 mules, at $200 12,400 No. G. 15 wagons, at $150 2,250 No. 7. 3 carts, at $75 225 No. 8. 3 drays, at $75 225 No. 9. 3 gas-tanks (iron), at $100 300 No. 10. 26,000 bush, corn (in ear), at $1 20,000 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. No. 11. .374 tons fodder (corn blade.s) and hay, at $25 9,350 No. 12. 5 horses, at §200. 1,000 No. 13. 5 bbls. brandy, at $400 2,000 The number of the items is tliirty-two ; of these, 'So. 31 is for 145,000 fence rails, made of the most beautiful and ex- pensive timber in the world, no doubt. The only thing that should surprise us in the bill of particulars is that the sixty-two mules were not put at ^1,000 each ! The mod- eration of the claimant has not, however, been appreciated ; for the claim is in the list of the disallowed. The first time it was presented the sum total was but $272,590. The amended petition is for §495,355. The efiect of not pay- ing in the first place is seen in the growth of 500 hogsheads of sugar in the first claim to 1,109 hogsheads in the sec- ond, while the price of the sugar expanded from $200 per hogshead to §325 per hogshead. The 800 cords of wood alleged, in the bill of particulars of 1871, to have been taken, grew to 3,000 cords in 1873. Forty mules, at §150 each, had multi[>lied to sixty-two mules, at §200 each. 5,000 bushels of corn were developed into 26,600 bushels ; 500 [)Ounds of bulk pork, in 1871, grew to 5,000 pounds in 1873; and if Tilden is elected, there is no reason to doubt that each item will be multiplied by ten, so that we shall have to pay for 50,000 pounds of bulk pork, and so on through the list. Take another example : "Xo. 14,103. Charles G. Kerr, Fitzhugh Lee, and George W. C. Lee, executors of Anna M. Fitzhugh, late of Alexandria County, Virginia, deceased. " Claim filed May 20, 1872. Value of 125,000 cords oak and pine tiriiber, cut and taken from the estate of Ravens- worth, Fairfax County, by orders of various Quartermas- ters, in 1861, '62, '63, '64, and '65, at §3 per cord, §375,000." The entire Ravensworth property, 7,826 acres, was as- sessed at §78,260 before the war and since, and the Com- missioners report the assessed value to be about two-thirds of the actual value; but here are §375,000 worth of wood cut oti:' a tract of laud worth at most §100,000, and the 18 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. value of the land not in the least impaired. The miracle of the loaves and iishes can not be said to rank with this achievement. Take the claim of ^frs. Annie Whitmore, of Whitfield county, Georgia, a bill for whose relief Avas kindly presented by the lion. Benoni S. Fuller, of Indiana. The amount of this claim is §840,494. Here are specimen points: 1 horse, which was by good judges estimated $2,300 35 liorses. $150 •'>,100 12 young mules, $175 2,100 4,250 bushels corn, $1.50 tJ,3T5 50 tons fodder, $15 "50 10 tons hay, $20 200 300 acres corn fodder -"tO 20 head beef cattle, $.50 1,000 202 bales of cotton, 500 lbs. per bale, taken for hospital pur- poses. $1 131,000 1,338 bales of cotton, 500 lbs. per bale, $1 609,000 4 parlor sets — 1 garnet velvet, 1 satin, 1 .«ilk, 1 stripe, $300 1,200 1 parlor set, black mohair 200 1 ])arlor set, green silk velvet 400 1 parlor set, plaid, stripe, blue, red, and green empress 3)0 1 piano, Chickering COO 1 i)iuno, Steinway grand 800 The Sfiirit of " conciliation, economy, and reform " dis- played in putting down only seven parlor sets of furni- ture — one a garnet velvet and another a green silk velvet — and of estimating an invaluable horse at $2,300 only — should be highly esteemed. Mr. Fuller was re-elected to Congress substantially on the merits of this little claim, in a strong Democratic district in Southern Indiana, and his public career promises to be a brilliant success. Among the bills presented to the present House of Rep- resentatives by Mr. Bright, of Tennessee, we will look at two (Tippod from a list of some hundreds of the same general ciiaracter. "A bill to pay the Presbyterian church of Mufreesboro, Tennessee, SlO,000, said church having been used as a hos- pital for sick and wounded Union soldiers. "A bill to pay Thomas Hoard $58,01)5 for supplies taken WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 19 and used by the army of the United States from the farm of said Hoard (the battle-ground of Stone River), near Mufreesboro, Tennessee." It is stated, by soldiers familiar with the place, that the Presbyterian church at Mufreesboro was not worth more than $5,000 when new, and that it was first occupied and damaged b}^ the Confederates, who used it as a hospital until driven from the town. The bill for damages done on the battle-ground of Stone River implies that the national troops were the only ones who disturbed the valuable prop- erty in that quarter, but the history of the battle does not quite corroborate this- flattering presumption. However, if the J^ational soldiers were trespassers throughout the war, the bill is accounted for, and ought to be paid. The next thing, perhaps, will be a bill from the old proprietors of the ground in and about the Anderson- ville prison-pens, for the trees destroyed by the prisoners in their efforts to shelter themselves from the sun and the rains. If we guide our feet by the lamps of the Democracy and along their peculiar paths of peace, what objection can be made to that bill ? Persons afiirm, however, that such bills are absurd and incredible, and that payment is impossible; and those who have attempted to impress upon the public the seriousness of the Southern prosecution of war claims have been hooted as phantom-fighters. Let us see if there is not every possible proof that could be given in advance of the accession of the Democratic party to power, of the. certainty that these very claims will be sharply pressed by a formidable force. Missouri leads the way in State action. She created a War Claims Com- mission in 1873; and Governor Woodson, in his annual message to the General Assembly, January 6, 1875, says : " There were presented to the Board of Commissioners eleven thousand nine hundred and sixty-one (11,961) claims, amounting in the aggregate to $4,844,362.29. Seven thou- sand five hundred and fifty-four (7,554) of those claims were allowed during the time in which the Board had the right to sit, and certificates have been issued therefor, ag- 20 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. gregating the sum of ^2,382,132.67. At the expiration of the time fixed by law for the adjustment of the claims pending before them, there were a great many claims un- acted upon, it proving a physical impossibility for the Com- missioners to examine and pass upon all the claims tiled within the time prescribed by the act." This is the first crop, so great that the handling of it was a physical impossibility. As for moral possibilities, any sovereign State can swing millions of them. If the Solid South succeeds in its enterprise, employing the Democratic party to capture the Government, there will be a succession of crops, each larger than all the preceding. In the State of Georgia the preparation of claims is such a business that blank forms to facilitate the work are circulated all over the State, and are an indispensable article of stationery. A citizen of Hamilton county, Ohio, an old Democrat, re- cently returned to his home from Alabama, where he has in- terests, ai\d related that when he told the Alabamians that he would go for Tilden, they talked to him in such a style that he thought it his duty as a good citizen to vote the Republican ticket. They denounced the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution as " bayonet amendments." They all said that the Yan- kee armies had marched across their farms, and had a stere- otyi>ed way of closing, "I have my bill made out, sir, and if there is any justice in this country I '11 get every dollar of it." There is no numbering these bills, and the appointed time for pressing them to payment is when the Democratic party takes possession of the Government. All the war claims that we have heard of are but the first drops of the shower, and the Southern sky is full of rain. After the election of Tilden, if that is to be, comes the Deluge. So impatient were the claimants that they could not wait for a pr(>[(itious time to reduce their hopes to legal writing. Tiiey have for years been making careful surveys, with a view to sapping and mining their way into the ISTational Treasury ; and recently they have been vigorously at work upon a concerted plan of siege, prepared, it is evident, by WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 21 skilled engineers, who have looked over the whole ground and marked out the approaches. Mr. Eitchie, of Maryland, April 13, 1872, made a speech, in which he arraigned the act of July 4, 1864, " which pro- vides for the payment of Southern claims on proof that the pro[)erty was actually taken and used by the United States army, and that the claimant was loyal to the United States." The grounds of his sensitive antagonism to the act were thus defined : " First — Because the proof required is too strict. , "Second — Because it does not provide payment for prop- erty damaged and destroyed. " Third — Because said act requires proof of loyalty," — On which he says : " In the bill I have submitted, proof is required only of the justice and validity of the claim. This may be regarded as a material omission b}' the majority of the House, and if its disposition is such that no additional facilities will be accorded to claimants unless the qualificatiou referred to is added,I would suggest that the bill is within the power of this House for such amendment as it may insist upon. I can only say for myself that in the light of my sworn obli- gation to support the Constitution, as I understand that fundamental charter alike of our power and the rights of the citizen, I could not recognize in any legislation of my offering a discrimination so false in principle, so pernicious in example, and so unjust in operation." It will be noted that this gentleman had constitutional scruples on the point of requiring proof of loyalty ! Come down to a later day and a programme more comprehensive. On the 30th of June, 1876, Mr. Cabell, of Virginia, reported from the House Committee on War Claims the bill [H. 11., 3,827,] for the relief of Pickrell and Broocks, of Vir- ginia. This bill was recommended by the "War Claims Committee, and appropriates the sum of $3,524.75 to pay these claimants, the net proceeds of tobacco taken from them at Wilmington, :N'orth Carolina, March 21, 1865. The claim is not of great proportions, but the distinguished gentleman from Virginia improved the occasion by laying •^2 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. down general principles of astounding magnitude. He Bays that as one of the claimants had received a special pardon from President Johnson, and the other having " come within the provisions of the several proclamations and general pardon of amnesties, the proof of such pardon is equivalent to affirmative proof under the statute of cap- tured and abandoned property, that the party never gave aid and comfort to the rebellion." AVhen we consider the source and the official promulgation of this sweeping report, we are bound to regard it as good Democratic doctrine. It is recent — it is fresh, and it is. strong. It is, that when Andrew Johnson forgave a rebel his sins, thenceforth the rebel w\as truly loyal, and always liad been so in the eye of the law ! This is certainly the nu>st marvelous regeneration of wdiich there is any account in the books, sacred or profane. Mr. Cabell's report from the Committee on "War Claims, goes on to announce that in reference to property taken from Southern owners by the Union armies, "the United States Government stands in the position of a trustee for the owner." 1 need not pause to speak of the scope of this proposition. It rolls over tlie whole case as the waters cover the great deep, and all the leviathans of the Confederacy can sport therein. We will next examine — '' House Resolution No. 553, by Hon. W. W. Wilshire, Arkansas — 'To facilitate the adjustment and settlement of claims of citizens of the United States, for stores and sup- plies taken or furnished during the rebellion, for the use of the Army of the United States,' including the use and loss of vessels and boats, 1)y authorizing suits to be instituted in tiie I'nited States Court in the district wherein the property was taken or used, such suits to be tried ' by said Courts in tlu same manner and by the same rules of evidence as that now prescribed by law for the trial of civil causes in the Circuit Courts of the United States.' " Tliis would refer each batch of claims to the citizens of the neighborhood that was despoiled, a scheme that would WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 23 fully meet the requirements of Mr. Cabell, of Virginia, that would avoid lacerating the susceptibilities of Mr. Ritchie, of Maryland, and that would prevent any severity of strain upon a Confederate General who might be Mr. Tilden's Secretary of War. Mr. Wilshire would abolish the Southern Claims Com- mission, and all tests of loyalty, and pay the damages as- sessed by juries out of a general appropriation. Of course, he has entire contidence in the spirit of reform and economy and wise finance, that has always animated the juries of Arkansas. There are so many resolutions having this general direc- tion and bearing, introduced into the House at its late ses- sion, that I can not attempt reference to them all ; but as we must notice the scheme of the Hon. Haywood Y. Riddle, of Tennessee, to make money plenty and times good in the South, without further labor by the inliabitants, the follow- ing is quoted : '' House Resolution I^o. 871, by Hon. H. Y. Riddle, of Tennessee — Provides that the testimony of ' any reputable citizen ' shall be admitted by the Court of Claims and War Department as effectually establishing the fact of appropri- ation of property for the use of the armies of the United States." This not onl}' discards the idea that loyalty has anything to do with war claims, but makes one oath by a rebel suffi- cient to establish effectually a claim. But Mr. Riddle's brightest achievement, looking to the prosperity of his section, without toil or spinning, is in the introduction, February 28, 1876, of a bill to open the treas- ury of the United States to make money plenty in the South — a bill referred to the Judiciarj' Committee, not, of course, to be reported until it can be favorably moved on. It is— " H. R. 2364. A bill directing compensation for the use and occupation of property by the United States army dur- ing the late war : " Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assem- 24 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. bled, that the Secretary of AVar be, and he is hereby au- thorized to allow reasonable compensation to all citizens of the United States for the use and occupation of their prop- erty by the United States army, or any part thereof, during the lute civil war, in the same manner and under the same regulations as compensation is now allowed for Quarter- master stores used by said army; provided, however, that the atHdavit of the claimant, supported by the competent testimony of any reputable citizen, shall be sufiicient proof to establish the fact of the use and occupation of such property by said army. But it is not the intention of this act to limit the parties to the amount of proof herein speci- lied ; but other and additional testimony hiay be taken to establish the fact of the use and occupation, and the rental value of the property occupied." Mr, Riddle is running for re-election to Congress, and this bill is the princii»al plank in his platform. It is a popular plank. He addressed the people of Jamestown, Tennessee, September 28, and claimed that all losses caused by Federal troops or by the Federal Government should be paid alike ; that " all Southern people are now loyal," and that no distinction should be made in the settlement of claims against the Government, but everybody should be paid; and pledged himself to work to that effect. Ilis meetings have recently been attended by a phonographic reporter, but he declines to speak when there is such an intrusion. He need not talk any more to his constituents, however. They fully understand him. His district is the Fourth Tennessee, and his popularity — growing out of his celebrity as the aflvocate of war claims, on the ground that all citizens are ecpially loyal and always have been, and that there can be no just distinctions in the law — is so great that he has no opi)Ositi<)n. The lion. K. II. Cox, who attempted to compete with him, has retired from the canvass. The report that we quote of Mr. Riddle's Jamestown sjtcech is from a business letter, and that gentleman's great jtopularity was accounted for in the remark that the pay- ment of war claims, according to his policy, would " make money i)lcnty and times good in the South." The people WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 25 of New York may be interested to mark this and inquire, at whose expense the benefactions are to flow from the pecuniary horn-of-pleuty, and who is to have the " usufruct" of the horn ? Mr. Ritchie, of Maryland, complained, twelve years ago, that the proof required on Southern claims was too strict, and that damaged property could not be included, while the crowning trouble was an unconstitutional requirement that loyalty should be shown. Mr. Cabell, of Virginia, from the Committee of War Claims of the present House, reports that the pardon of a rebel is afiirmative proof that he was always loyal, and de- clares that the United States Government is in the position of a trustee of the Confederate claimants for property taken in the war. Mr. AVilshire, of Arkansas, would facilitate the settle- ment of claims by trials by jury, so that the tracks of our armies should be followed by juries of the respective neigh- borhoods through which they passed, agreeing upon dam- ages to be distributed among themselves. Mr. Riddle, of Tennessee, would take testimony in claims cases without giving consideration to the question of loy- alty, and he would allow compensation to all citizens of the United States for the use and occupation of their property by the United States army, upon the proposition that all discriminations in tlie law against disloyalists are unjust and offensive. Taking together Mr. Ritchie, of Maryland, Mr. Cabell, of Virginia, Mr. Wilshire, of Arkansas, and Mr. Riddle, of Tennessee, it is but just to those gentlemen to say that they seem to have left little in the nature of preliminaries to look after — and there never has been a whisper that they did not have the w^arm approbation of the folks at home. The record of Mr. Riddle in Congress seems to his con- stituents a very handsome one. He is credited w^ith a good phrase asserting universal loyalty, and equal rights for all in war claims. There is no better Democratic doctrine than his, for the practical application of it is that wherever 26 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. the Xatioiial armies marched there is a Confederate harvest to be slathered. And it woukl be well if these cool and learned gentle- men, who aftect to sneer away this aspect of the claims question, would kiiully condescend to tell the people of New York what ai-gument or attribute the Democratic party has, that would resist the war-claims policy of the Solid South, as it is defined in the legislation that Mr. Kiddle has proposed. If we begin by admitting that the Union was a Confed- ei-acy— that the election of Lincoln was an offense — the Southern campaigns John Brown raids on a large scale, and the abolition of slavery and the enfranchisement of the freedmen, capital outrages— we must end by placing the South on an equality with the North in money mat- ters; that is, we must pay the Southern war debts and claims of every name and nature. Or, from our stand- point, we must pay for the war over again, and something more, for the South was the greater sufferer; and if we would conciliate on the basis of having done a wrong, we must not complain if we have to pay an indemnity equal to the damage we have done. The Southern people say they desired to go apart, and were compelled to remain. They say to us : " You marched through our country destroying our property, and we w^ere nnable to retaliate. You doubled your money in bonds, while we lost all that we put into our bonds ; and you gave tlio blacks the right to confiscate through taxation the little we bad when the war was over. You forced us into the Union, and we propose to stay. Now, we are as loyal as you are — as good as you are. We are poor. Above all things we need money. Here are the bills for the ruin that you wrought ! If we are equals under the law, the payment of these claims is but fair — and then why should not our cri[»pled boys have pensions as well as yours ?" They need the money badly enough. They believe they ought to have it. Is it public policy to pay it? Only a fraction of it could come from the South itself. Do you, ht-re in Now York, think it will be in the interest of Re- WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 27 form, and especially Economy, to pay your share of it? Are you unwilling to be taxed to this end ? Would you prefer to go with the Greenbackers and issue legal tenders to meet all Southern demands, make money plenty, and give us another experience of ^var times in Wall street? If not, you should take care not to go with the Solid South — the new shape of the Southern Confederacy — in this critical campaign. The Southern excitement touching war claims is not as yet very noisy, but it is intense and pro- found. It has been restrained by every prudential consid- eration that could influence men convinced that they have been wronged and resolved to be righted, and yet it is submitted there is ample testimony before the country to determine the action of prudent citizens. It were easy to specify circumstances in corroboration of the proof until you would wear}' with the recital. A Southern Eepubli- can, writing from the State of Mississippi, October 3,1876, to Hon. Warner M. Bateman, District Attorney of the Southern District of Ohio, says: " If we should attempt to organize our party in this State, and advocate the support of Hayes and Wheeler, it wHiuld cause riot and bloodshed all over the State, for the White Line Kebels are determined to carry the State, though w^e have a clear majority of thirty thousand at a fair election. Any excuse to deprive Republicans of their rights as American citizens is a source of great consolation to the White Liners." The writer adds, it is the purpose of the controlling spir- its of that State to " remunerate themselves out of the public treasury for losses sustained by the war." If these things occur in the green tree, wdiat may not be expected in the dry wood ? Can any people having saving common sense atFord to disregard these claims, the certainty and immensity of which are attested by proposed legislation, manifestly pre- pared to remove all the safeguards of the Treasury, while they are notoriously backed by the passionate and exacting public opinion of the section whence they spring ? So un- equivocal are the claims, and so prodigious are they (the ag- 28 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. grc^ate represented in the various bills of si.ccial and general TegislatiGn exceeding two thousand five hundred millions of dollars)— so distinct are the principles upon which they are based, and so consonant arc those principles with the char- acter of the party that must take the responsihility of tiiein.— while the line of argument by which they are jus- tified is staked out quite to the horizon— that fair notice has been served upon the country that they are to be pros- ecuted with the entire strength of the United South. And it is distinctly indicated that the price of the Southern support of the Democratic party is the service of the party as the claim agency for that section. The ready assertion of the average Democratic local pol- itician of the Xorth is that the party would, if placed in control of the Government, be responsible to the country for the success of the Administration, and could not con- sent to consider the war claims in the shape and to the ex- tent that we suggest. It is thus assumed, in the first place, that the Democratic party is, where the Solid South is con- cerned, a free agent. I do not believe it is so. The South has the force of a clear purpose, an inflexible will, an un- appeasable animosity, and the habit of command, as well as a hungry sense of a right to have a square meal at home ; and it will have, as it has had, its way with the party. It is said the Democratic party would quickly destroy itself by taking up the Southern claims, and must, in cold- blooded reason, be credited with too strong an instinct of self-preservation to swiftly rush to certain slaughter. But this identieal party, backed by a majority merely in the South, withstood for years the odium of the Fugitive Slave Law, and the ruling caste in it at last felt strong enough to re[ioal the Missouri Compromise and attempt the national- ization of slavery. Give these partisans the whole South with its enlarged representation — every Congressional Dis- trict — and i)lace in their hands the army for reorganization, with the cbance of restoring the Confederate leaders to tiieir old regiments ; let them rebuild the navy and use the vast civil patrcniage of the government, extravagantly extended as it has been in the last sixteen years — add to WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. * 29 this the "solid vote" that the CatlioHc Telegraph of Cin- cinnati promised tlie party ; let one wing of the Democratic army rest u[»on Hichmond and the otlier upon Rome; and reckon upon the arts of Demagoguery that would harness in one team the fanatics of the Ultramontane and the Com- munist schools — and we are not sure that the Democrac}- — always the regulars in our politics and never subjected to discipline more rigorously than now — could defy the power of enlightened public opinion for a tedious term of years. It is quite certain that if this powerful party is placed in possession of the General Government by the casting vote of the State of New York one week from Tuesday next — and that is precisely the contingency that the people of this State should have in mind — no matter how profligate and reckless the Administration might be, it could not be over- thrown without a long and stormy, and perhaps a danger- ous struggle. Give the Democratic party the power that with the help of New York it may grasp, and there would prevail through the whole range of official life, and in the ranks of the long array of those who get their living out of pol- itics, an intolerant assertion of Party Infallibility. The despotism would be of iron grip, and any attempt to dis- turb it would be denounced as resembling old-fashioned Abolitionism in its sectional aspect, as threatening another incendiary raid upon the Holy Confederacy of the Solid South, and as a reckless assault upon the sacred peace of the sunny land that reposes under the undisputed sway of pocket lirearms. I trust we shall not now, or ever, try the costly experi- ment of committing the country to this course. But there are good citizens who desire to take this crisis quietly, who are making themselves content with saying that the shrewd men at the head of the Democratic party are too cautious to impose the taxes that would be required to raise the money to pay the Southern war claims. It has not perhaps oc- curred to them — -though many of them, no doubt, take a deep interest in the speedy resumption of specie payments — that the claimants might be content with " more green- 30 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. backs." They have not seen that the Kag-baby and the Solid South with her solemn claims were made for each other. They have not studied the history of the Ohio campaign in 1875, which the inflationists — meaning mis- chief mountain high — started with the expectation of sweeping the country, putting forth as their phitform the Confederate system of finance — the very system that made money so abundant in the South, while the Southern armies were still strong, that a pair of boots cost a thousand dol- lars. The inevitable way to pay the Confederate war claims is with legal-tender paper. Those claims fortuitously offer the solution of the difficulty of the rag-money maniacs in distributing new issues. Bales of thousand-dollar notes will be wanted to pay the toll of our armies on the turn- jtikes in the sacred soil, and to compensate those wdio were conquered for all their losses and sorrows ; and as the cost of producing a thousand-dollar note is not greater than that of a one-dollar note, we shall have big money printed, and W'ith it celebrate our " wise finance " to the ends of the earth. We shall put the stamp of the United States u23on all the paper that the emergency, which can always be found, calls for. In the language of the platform of the immortal Inflationists in Ohio, we shall " make the vol- ume of currency equal to the wants of trade." This will give all the gamblers and speculators, and all the ravenous beasts of prey that consume the substance of the industrious and the poor, a harvest of spoil and a carnival of indulgncee; but there will be plenty of money in the land at last, and the South will ''get even" with the North for the war. The finances of the United States will be equalized with those of the Southern Oonfed- eracy. Confederate bonds and National bonds w'ill belong in a common abyss. The era of the perfect equality of cit- izens and sections will come — when we are all fallen into the bottomless [)it of bankruptcy together. Would Governor Tilden, as President of the United States, consent to such a catastrophe? I am not here to speak of the personal character of Governor Tilden. I suppose he is as well known in New York as Governor WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 31 Hayes in Oliio, and I leave hiiu to 3'on. Grant him all the good qualities his friends believe him to possess, and he conld not be the master of the Democratic part}-. There is a stupendous Devil in that party that will not be mas- tered. As to civil service reform, a Democratic President could not resist the demand to turn everybody out, to make room for as many of his party as possible ; and it is unrea- sonable to hold that the public business conld be seriously thought of. Why, if there was to be a Democratic Presi- dent inaugurated, the crowd of office-seekers around the Public Buildings in Washington would be like that of the sight-seers at the Centennial on Pennsylvania's da3^ Fancy an old gentleman like Governor Tilden, not feeble, perhaps, but certainly not robnst, resisting the mad onset of this hungry multitude, in the name of civil service reform ! The attrition would be too great for any human endur- ance. It is remarkable in our annals that there has more than once been a dramatic removal of a President who stood in the way of the pronounced policy of the most advanced thinkers of the party of the Solid South. General Harri- son, having John Tyler behind him, was speedily taken hence. General Taylor, after the development of his op- position to the Cotton States Conspirators, was suddenly called away. James Buchanan was poisoned with the rats at the jSTational Hotel, but through strength of constitution was spared to see that the Illation had no right to preserve itself — and his health was good, while the country was read}' to perish. K Governor Tilden should enter into an unseemly antagonism with the more active and potent in- iluences of his party, I apprehend that his strength would soon be shaken and fretted away in the severe friction of his position, and might fail him altogether; that he would be as unable to withstand, through a Presidential term, the racket of the contending patriots as Harrison was — or that he might find a midsummer's cherry-pie lunch as fatal as Tajdor found it. Even if Governor Tilden means real re- form, we know that his party does not; and so great an interest should not hang by the thread of one life. And it 32 AVAli CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. Tiklen were not, where in the world could his party lind a Kotbrmcr? The people of Xew York arc not, I think, en- amored of the " wise iinance " of the Governor of Indiana, where the doctrine is taught that the leaves of the syca- more, with the United States stamp upon them, are " real money." Governor Seymour recommends the people to elect a Democratic President, hy way of keeping up a division of responsibility in the drjKirtments of the Government. I fear, if tlie experiment were tried, that the result would not ai>prove his judgment. It is hard to separate Senates from E.xecutive Power. The Senate of the United States would be moved, as by the attraction of gravitation, to harmony with the White House. Then the Supreme Court is not the invulnerable barrier against Executive usurpation and sectional aggression that it stands for in the popular estimation. A very respectable minority of the Judges are Democratic. Others are ap- jiroaching the time of life when not only retirement is thought of, but provision is made for it. The extent of the country, and the accunmlation of business suggest reorgan- ization, and an increase in the num1)er of tlie Judges. A Democratic President and House would have the Senate and the Sujireme Court also, within two years, if not earlier. And wlio can believe that in this case — with the united and detei-mincd Confederate South as the bottom fact and the impelling force of the party in power — the amendments to the Constitution could stand ? The equality asserted by tlie politicians of the South — the equality of the Rebellion with the Authorities — the equal rights in their Fathers' House of the Confederate with the National sol- diers — the equal rights of the States that seceded with tliose that adhered — the personal susceptibilities of the vSouthern leaders — the policy of the Feast of the Fatted Calf — do not mean anything less than that the war amend- ments shall be wi[ied from the Constitution. It is not " the Constitution as it is," that commands the veneration of the Democratic party. It is the old Constitution — the Consti- tution as it was, over which they asserted an exclusive right WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 33 of interpretation, that they revere and vvonld restore — and that they would ai^ain construe in their own, old way. Then Ave would ail be " loyal," except those wlio smote sovereign States to the dust, and they declared the mur- derers of States and the minions of despotism, might at last be forgiven by the exalted Confederates. They could only be forgiven, however, on the ground that their errors were involuntary — that their trespasses upon sacred soil must be charitably charged to youthful enthusiasm and helpless ignorance of the Constitution. And we should all be called to remember that the great and only exponents of that in- strument dwell in the South, entitled to the dignity of a dynasty in the rare enjoyment of Restoration to their do- nunions. There is no capacity within the Democratic party to resist the programme of the Solid South, for, as they concede its justice, the assertion of its inexpediency must be in vain. The change that the people desire is a change for the better — a reformation, not a revolution — and the econ- omy called for could hardly be found in doubling the I^ational debt. I believe we could count upon a whole- some change — upon an economical, honorable, high-minded administration, if Governor Hayes were elected President ; and I feel it may be worth while, under the circumstances, to speak of my personal knowledge of the man. I have been acquainted with him about a quarter of a century, and he improves upon acquaintance. He and I lived in the same ward for several years, and belonged to the Cincinnati Literary Club — the only society of which, outside of college and army associations, he ever was a member. The story that he was a Know-Kothing, repeated in various forms, does not resemble the truth in any shape it has taken. I was in consultation with him in March, 1856, in organ- izing a People's Movement, the primary object of which was to defeat the Know-JSTothing party in Cincinnati. We met in the office of Stephen Molitor, the leader of the Liberal Germans at that time ; and, though it is more than twenty years ago, I remember the apt remark of Hayes, as 34 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. some of tliose enlisted with us were willing themselves to he caiuliilates, that the people would prohahly be more im- pressed with the iitness for office of a man if he was not himself active in making the ticket, lie was to have been called to preside at the meeting that we appointed to pre- sent the cause of Reform to the people, but the Know- Nothings took possession of the hall by a concerted move- ment of delegations from their Lodges; and they had only this measure of success to console themselves withal, for they were defeated in the election of the April following, and their prestige in Cincinnati was broken. "When Colonel Hayes came home after the battle of South Mountain, bad!}* wounded, with his shattered arm in a sling, lie was asked to attend a public meeting to aid in getting his ward "out of the dratt." lie at iirst declined to go, hnt as liis ohl neighbors insisted, he consented, and was called u[»on for a speech. His opening remark was that it had been his preference, glad as he was to see those about hirti, not to be present on that occasion, for he was not cer- tain that he symitathized with the object for which they as- sembled. The first duty of the people was to fill up the wasted ranks of the army. If the object of the meeting was to send to the field the number of men that the order for the draft called for in the ward, he was heartily with them; but if it was the policy to clear the ward on paper, without reference to the number of recruits furnished, he did not desire that they should succeed. It was immediately ascertained that the object of the meeting was not at all that the able-bodied men of the ward should escape the draft, but to send the material for good soldiers to the front ! It would not have been suspected by any one looking in upon the meeting, that the wounded officer in weather-beaten blue clothes — a common soldier's blouse, with a war-worn eagle on the shoulder; — the officer with a blue eye that kindled as he spoke, and a voice with the ring of martial music in it — was a man likely to be ac- cused of lacking a will and ways of his own. Many earnest [leople have for some years made a close study of civil service reform, and the theory is generally WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 35 accepted that this sort of reform, at least, is desirable. The language of Governor Hayes, in accepting the Cincinnati nomination, is on this subject singularly explicit, and those who had given the methods of the reform their closest at- tention, were struck with the fact that Ha3'es wrote about it as if he had been thinking of it for himself. And so he had. He commenced the work of civil service reform in his first term as Governor of Ohio. Understanding experimentally the question, the words of his letter of acceptance sped to the center of the mark like rifle-balls, showing the "white disc" at every shot. One of his well-taken points, after his first election, in 1868, was that minorities should have representation in elective boards. In 1870, he urged upon the Legislature the passage of a law incorporating this " measure of reform," and the law was secured and is retained, proving highh^ useful. He carried the principle of minority representation into his appoint- ments of public boards and oflicers, and did it to an extent that made enemies in his own part}'. He has pursued the same policy in his third gubernatorial term, reappointing nine Democrats, appointees of Governor Allen, to salaried positions in the penal and benevolent institutions of the State. In making out the Supreme Court Commission, he appointed three Democrats, and when the Republican Leg- islature created a Police Board in Cincinnati, the Governor appointed a Democrat on the Board ; and he has had a c)ever faculty in finding a few places for Liberal Republi- cans, who are not now, I understand, in possession of a party of their own! Those who have known Governor Hayes loiigest, and have had the closest opportunities for observation, are the most positive of his friends, in the judgment that if he is elected President, he will have a very large influence in the administration. There is already an outcry from the South that those who are unwilling to concede that the w'ar was fought in vain, are narrow and bitter; and the}'' are supposed to have inherited the sectional opprobrium once attached, in the conceit of the Confederates, to the opponents of the exten- sion of slavery — yet there has been nothing since Lincoln 36 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. at Gettysburg, in better temper, or with liner insight, or in happier phrase, than the i)assage relating to the Sonth in the letter of Governor Hayes aceeiiting the Cincinnati nom- ination. His sense ofjnstice and sentiment of generosity — a brave man's respect for the brave, a strong man's sympa- thy with misfortune,— shine through the clear sentences ; and taking him all in all, I feel warranted in hopefulness that if he becomes our Chief Magistrate, we may find in him the gift of statesmanship for the healing of the Nation. Citizens of the State of !N"ew York: The lesson of the war that never should depart from us is, that the American people have no exemption from the ordinary fate of human- ity. If we sin, we must sufter for our sins, like the Empires tliat are tottering and the Nations that have perished. Six- teen years ago we were drifting into war, and, though the current was like the Niagara rai)ids, few among us felt that it was irresistible, and saw the shores of the land of peace and plenty recede, or heard the swelling roar of the cata- ract. Whither are we drifting in these Indian summer days? Upon what portentous stream is the Ship of State? Is it sailing "Through channels measureless by man, Down to a sunless sea?" There is in the prescribed form of counting the Electoral votes cast, or certified to be cast, for President, an uncer- tainty tljat, in the state of the country, may be fitly de- scribed as a peril. The houses of Congress are already at variance. They quarreled on this subject when the liepub- licans had a majority in both, and the vote of the disputed State made no difference in the general result. The joint rules, including the twenty-second, have been abolished, and there is oidy the Constitutional provision as a guide. In a L'ontingency that is not only not impossible, but not improbMbk', there is certain to be a disagreement involving a disputed Presidential elcetion, whieh would be a calamity without i»recedent and beyond calculation. Thoughtful citizens long ago, feeling this possibility as a i)alpable tliougli distant terror, have prayed that the Presidential elections might always be decisive — and God grant that WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 37 they may. But we are pressing closely upon the danger in the dark. The October elections have not, as in other days, settled the question of the Presidenc3\ What if the November election also should be inconclusive? What if the result of the question of Tilden or Hayes for President rested upon a Southern State — upon Mississippi or South Carolina, with the Derringer in one and the Bayonet in the other ; and the heated politicians, gathered at Washington, and desperate, should Hy at eacli other's throats, and let slip the dogs of war? A disputed Presidential election would Mexicanize us. There is incalculable ruin in it. If the New York electoral vote is given the Democratic can- didates, we are imminently threatened with this degrada- tion. If New York is Republican, the danger is over. The whole duty of the Republicans of the State will be performed, for they know their responsibility, and value their privilege. It would appear also that the good citizens who do not "give up to party what was meant for man- kind," see that the safety of the country demands the de- feat of the Democratic party, and will be happy to admin- ister to it the final stroke of fate, and tlius open with auspicious fortune the Second Century of the Republic. THE ONLY POINT IN TILDEN S LETTER WHICH REQUIRES ANALY- SIS REVIEWED — THE SUPREME COURT AND THE CLAIMS — THE DEMOCRATIC WAY TO MAKE TIMES GOOD AND MONEY PLENTY. To the Editor of the World : In the leading article of this morning's issue of your journal I am called upon as an " expert " in Southern claims, and asked what I have to say in reply to your re- marks on my Cooper Union address. I venture to assume that you want to hear from me, and avail myself with much pleasure of the opportunity that your call affords, to notice certain lines of commentary upon that address, that have a tendency to misdirect the attention of the public. The feeling that I experience of obligation to you for this call is akin to the sense of grateful appreciation that I enjoyed 38 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. of the timeliness of Governor Tilden's letter, in which, on the morning of my deliverance on Southern claims, he kindly testified that the subject to which I was about ad- dressing myself was the business and burning question of the day. I do not claim to be an "expert" in Southern claims, but my attention has been for some time directed to them, and I iiave been deeply impressed by their magnitude and by the threatening force that is behind them, while I have been surprised by the lack of general understanding of the extent and imminence of the danger that appears in the levity or indifference with which the matter has until now been treated in this part of the country. Governor Tilden is not a maii who lacks capacity in affairs, and his letter of the 24th shows that while his courage may be shaken he has not lost the clearness of his faculty of apprehension or the cunning of his right hand. In the contingency of Democratic success, if there is anything in the performance of the promises that letter contains, that proves his an- nouncement of the "futility" of the "self-imposed re- straints" of candidates to have been an error in his case — if there happens to be anything within his capacity that liinders the Solid South in its movement to " get even " in money with the JSTorth for the war — I promise to take the sincerest satisfaction in recognizing it, and to give him all the help I can command ; for I am sure in that case he will stand in great need of friends not of his party. There arc half a dozen lines only in Governor Tilden's letter that seem to require analysis. The quotations from the Constitution and his message are irrelevant, but he says : "No claim for any loss or damage incurred by disJoyal pcr.-oiis arising from the late war, whether covered by the Fourteenth Amendment or not, will be recognized or paid. The cotton tax will not be refunded. I shall deem it my duty to veto every bill providing for the assumption or pay- ment of any such debts, losses, damages, claims, or for the refunding of any such tax." Governor Tilden has neglected to notice that the advo- WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 39 cacy of the war claims in the South is based upon the theory that " we are all loyal now ;" and he has only to accept this favorite Southern doctrine of the day, and the declaration by Mr. Cabell, of Virginia, in his report from the Committee on "War Claims, that the loyalty that results from official pardon is retroactive, to justify himself in not vetoing any of the acts of legislation that he specifies. I quoted, in the Cooper Union address, the report, on the 30th of June, 1876, from the House Committee on War Claims that accompanied the bill for the relief of Pickrell and Broocks. Mr. Cabell said in it that when a claimant had a special pardon, and was within the provisions of the several proclamations and general pardon of amnesties, the proof of such pardon was "equivalent to affirmative proof under the statute of captured and abandoned property, that the party never gave aid and comfort to the rebellion," Therefore, any claim preferred by a pardoned rebel would be a loyalist's claim under the law, and Governor Tilden's promise to veto the claims of disloyal persons would not have effect in their cases ; and there are very few rebels now of any other sort. Mr. Cabell also stated that the United States Govern- ment stood, for " property taken," in the position of trustee for the owners. The World quotes a decision of Chief Justice Waite, and contends that he holds precisely the doctrine announced by Mr. Cabell. If this were so, it would justly increase the public disquietude about South- ern claims, for it would appear that the highest judicial tribunal in the country had opened wide the gate for the Confederate advance upon the Treasury ; and this would be quick and thorough corroboration of my guarded expres- sions of a fear that the Supreme Court was not to be relied upon as an invulnerable barrier. I thought the process of reorganization would be required before the Court could reach the point that, according to the World, it has already passed. With respectful deference, however, to the legal talent of the World, I submit that Waite's decision that the Gov- ernment stands in the position of trustee for persons who, 40 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. under a special act of Congress, were entitled to the pro- ceeds of captured and abandoned property, " and for those whom it (the government) should thereafter recognize as entitled "—words the world is at pains to print in italics- is far from being as comprehensive as Mr. Cabell's report that the Government was the trustee for the owners of all " property taken " for the use of the army, and that a rebel with Andrew Johnson's pardon was in possession of " af- iirmative proof" that he " never gave aid and comfort to the rebellion." I do not care to waste a word in discussing with anybody the political character of the Supreme Court. I am only concerned to show the people that if they place the Democratic party in power, there are no sufficient re- straints to prevent the " Solid South " from making a raid on the Treasury of the United States; and I thank the World for the assistance it has unwittingly given in mak- ing conspicuous this important fact, and throwing under a strong light Mr. Cabell's very significant report. Reference is made to the " contrivances of Congress," in 18G3, touching "captured and abandoned property," but I am not in the least degree anxious to show that when the liepublicans were in power in Congress they made a per- fect record. I am aware of the misconduct of Republicans in and out of Congress, and have spent a good deal of time and labor in attempting to persuade them of the errors of their ways. The "contrivances" that are of interest at this time are those of the Confederates to obtain out of the people at large compensation for their losses during the war, In 1872 (April 13), Mr. Ritchie, of Maryland, denounced tlie act of July 4, 1864, that restricted payments for " prop- erty taken " to loyal claimants, because there were strict requirements that proof should be had not only of actual taking, l)ut of loyalty ; and because provision was not nxade to pay for property damaged and destroyed. Mr. "Wilshire, of Arkansas, in House Resolution (last session) No. 553, desires to "facilitate the adjustment and seltlement " of claims, and proposes the abolishment of the Claims Com- mission, and that the jury of the vicinage shall be called WAK CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 41 to levy damages. Mr. Riddle, of Tennessee, has introduced a bill directing " compensation for the use and occupation " of property "to all citizens;" and to facilitate getting at the public money, one witness is declared enough to " ef- fectually establish the fact " of the appropriation of prop- erty. These are among the contrivances to turn over the property of the people of the United States to Southern rebels, as "indemnity" for the "aggressive war" made" upon them by the Nation. Mr. Riddle, of the Fourth Tennessee District, the author of the bill to expedite the payment of the claims of (Con- federates, has been made so popular by his urgency in their behalf that his competitor has witlidrawn from the canvass, and the legislation that Mr. Riddle proposes is regarded as the way to " make times good and money plenty." Now, Mr. Riddle and Governor Tilden would not be troubled to reach an understanding and co-operate in the interests of " reform and economy." Mr. Riddle would not pay the claims of disloyalists. He, too, would veto such things. He stands upon a broad principle. He discounts Mr. Ca- bell's report that a pardoned rebel has affirmative proof that he was always lo3'al. He says, " all Southern ])eople are loyal now," and always were so in the eye of the law. Can a decision by Chief Justice Waite be found covering this ground also ? Accept it, and Tilden's promises pass away, and the Solid South comes to the front for its in- demnity. You tell us : " The great majority of the South does not seek any payment of Southern claims." You are mistaken. There are tens of thousands of war claims carefully pre- pared in the South awaiting, with the Wilshire resolution and the Riddle bill, to accept, according to Mr. Cabell, from their " trustee " pecuniary redress for all grievances. Doug- lass Jerrold said of the soil of Australia, that if you tickled it with a hoe it would laugh with a harvest. It is the pe- culiarity of the Southern soil that wherever it was tickled by a United States bayonet there is an eruption of Con- federate claims ; and the Solid South, if the Democratic party obtains possession of the Government, will speed- 42 ^VAR CLAIMS OF THE SOFTH. ilv disentangle the "futile*' technicalities of Governor Tilden's letter, interposed in the newspapers between them and the Treasury when the South was utterly committed to him, and the Presidential election was plainly to be de- cided by Xew York. You speak of the already heavy taxation of the South, and that the people of that section would not tax them- selves to pay their own claims. The plea of the South is poverty. But the plan is to establish equality in money matters with the Xorth. Three-fourths of the revenue out of which the claims would be paid must come from the States that adhered to the Union in the war. And do you forget that a vast majority of the Western Democrats are fully persuaded that the way to make the people happy and wealthy, to make '• times good and money plenty," is to print *• more greenbacks ?" They desire to "• make the amount of currency equal to the wants of trade." They would have war times in Wall street in time of peace. Governor Tilden yielded the point that the date fixed for resumption should be repealed ; and some knowledge of Western Democrats leads me to believe that if he keeps their favor, he has but taken the first step in a long walk of concessions on the currency question, in which he will have to unlearn the teachings of his forty years of public discussion of that range of subjects. In the event of a Democratic Administration, the Solid South and the Solid Mississippi Valley would be united on the basis of more greenbacks to pay Southern Claims and carry out the rebel and inflation programme ; and the fact that the inevitable end must be general repudiation, would not deter, but rather inspire them ; for in the abyss of bankruptcy there would be the equalization of the finances of the Southern Confederacy with the United States. I doubt whether Governor Tilden's bosom would fortify the country like a wall of adamant against the allied powers of the Solid South as a claimant, and the rasr-babv as the mas- tcr of the mysteries of wise finance. M. Halsteal. Xew York, Friday, October 27, 1876. WAE CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. 43 THE WORTHLESSXESS OF GOV. TILDEX S RECENT PLEDGE DE-, MAXDS BEYOXD MR. TILDEN'S COXTROL A SDfGLE SAMPLE IN MISSOURI OF WHAT THE SOUTH ARE DETERMINED TO HATE WITH DEMOCRATIC VICTORY— TILDEX's DEFEAT THE ONLY SAFEGUARD. To the Editor of the World : In a spirit of reciprocity for your " memorandum " of this morning, I desire to place at your service a few items that will be found of interest to the tax-payers who have had their attention called, by Gov. Tilden's letter and other documents, to the Southern raid upon the Xational Treas- ury with Confederate war claims. I was ghid to see Gov. Tilden's letter, and the disclaimers from Southern men of a purpose to press those claims are all welcome ; for those who have studied the question with the greatest attention have the gravest apprehension of its magnitude. Gov. Tilden's letter is proof of the existence of the " public peril " that I attempted to describe in the address that was sufficiently " delivered '"' to serve my pur- poses in preparing it. He certainly did go further than his partisan friends have been accustomed to do, in admitting that there might be Southern claims not covered by the fourteenth amendment. If I have not heretofore done justice to that admission, I propose now to do work meet for repentance of the sin of omission. You quote Gov. Tilden as saying : " Xo claim for any loss or damage incurred by disloyal persons arising from the late war, whether covered hy the fourteerdh amendment or not, will be recognized or paid." The amount of this is that Gov. Tilden oilers us his per- sonal pledge as security against the payment of the claims outside the fourteenth amendment. Without questioning his sincerity — as might be done under the circumstances Avithout extraordinary bitterness of antagonism — I must pronounce the security insufficient. It is well to have it, but it is poor collateral to put up with the amendment. Indeed, I am of opinion that if the Democratic Party takes 44 WAR CLAIMS OF THE SOUTH. possession of'tlie Government, neither the Constitution nor the President could stand against tlie solid South and resist the war claims of that section for two 3'ears. The four- teenth amendment is not the child of the Democratic Party, and the Democratic President who could withstand the master of his party— Ihe solid South— as a claimant for damages during the war by trespasses on the sacred soil, lias not been invented and certainly has not appeared in Gov. Tilden. Tiie passage from Governor Tilden's letter is given above as the Wod'l italicized it. I desire to emphasize the words " disloyal persons," The theory upon which the solid South presses its claims is that there are no such persons. Mr. Cabell, of Virginia, reports from the Conmiittee on War Claims, in a bill granting relief in a tobacco case, that, legally, a pardoned rebel never was a rebel at alb That, I suppose, must be the Democratic law. Mr. Kiddle, of Ten- nessee, says, " we are all loyal now," a phrase that covers the Democratic sentiment. Why, then, does Governor Tilden nsc the expression " disloyal persons " in a letter calling for legal exactness as well as a strictly defined expression of the feeling and judgment of his party ? If there arc any [)Crsons not according to law loyal under ' the interpretation that Mr. Cahill makes of pardons, it is the Democratic i)olicy that their loyalty shall be recognized and established. This would leave Mr. Tilden's pledge without application, with the exception of the part alloted to " scrutiny," which is to be done with "jealous care " — words which are not of much value within a fortnight of a Presidential election. 1 do not believe Gov. Tilden and his lieutenants in labor in this city have understood the full extent of the solici- tuc"C, If '