Class £ SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY BULLETIN 56 ETHNOZOOLOQY OF THE TEWA INDIANS BY JUNIUS HENDERSON" AND JOHN PEABODY HARRINGTON 516395 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 Monograph ,f 5 H °\ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL The School op American Archaeology, Santa Fe, N. Mex., November 1, 1912. Dear Sir: I herewith transmit the manuscript of a paper entitled "Ethnozoology of the Tewa Indians/' by Junius Henderson and John P. Harrington. I am authorized by the managing committee of The School of American Archaeology to offer this work for publication by the Bureau of American Ethnology as a part of the results of the coop- erative work of our respective institutions during 1910 and 1911. I am, very truly, yours, Edgar L. Hewett, Director, The School of American Archaeology. Mr. F. W. Hodge, Ethnologist in Charge, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, I). ('. LETTER OF SUBMITTAL Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, D. C, November 22, 1912. Sir: I have the honor to submit, with the recommendation that it be published as a bulletin of the Bureau of American Ethnology the manuscript of a memoir bearing the title ' ' Ethnozoology of the Tewa Indians," by Junius Henderson and John P. Harrington. This memoir embodies a part of the results of the joint researches conducted in New Mexico by the Bureau of American Ethnology and The School of American Archaeology during 1910 and 1911. Very respectfully, F. W. Hodge, Ethnologist in Charge. Hon. Charles D. Walcott, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution. CONTENTS Page Phonetic key ix General considerations 1 Classification of animals 9 Annotated list of animals 12 Mammals 12 Birds 33 Reptiles 46 Lizards 47 Snakes 50 Turtles 52 Amphibians (Batrachians) 52 Salamanders, frogs, toads 53 Fishes 54 Insects 56 Crustaceans, myriapods, and arachnids 60 Mollusks 61 The lower invertebrates 67 Coral 68 Bibliography 69 Index 73 PHONETIC KEY It is necessary to preface this memoir with a key to the Tewa sounds and the symbols adopted to represent them. 1. Orinasal vowels, pronounced with mouth and nose passages open: a (Eng. father, but orinasal), z§ (Eng. man, but orinasal), £ (moderately close e, orinasal), \ (Portuguese sim), q. (French pas, but orinasal), o (moderately close o, orinasal), y, (Portuguese atotm). 2. Oral vowels, pronounced with mouth passage open and nose passage closed by the velum: a (Eng. father), e (moderately close e), i (Eng. routine), o (moderately close o), u (Eng. rule). An inverted period after a vowel symbol indicates that the vowel is long. A superior vowel symbol indicates that the vowel is very short and grating (knarrstimmig). The vowels are breathy, and unless followed by the glottal stop, a glottalized stop, or a voiced sound, an aspiration is distinctly heard toward the end. 3. Semi-vowels: j (Ger. j&, but very fricative), w (Eng. way). 4. Laryngeal consonants: h (laryngeal h), ' (glottal stop, lenis). 5. Dorsal consonants: k (voiceless lenis), kw (voiceless lenis labialized, Latin quis), Jc (glottalized), k' (aspirated), [/ (Eng. finger, voiced inflative a preplosively nasal), g (Castilian aboaado), qw (Castilian juez), y (Eng. singer), yw (Eng. Langru'orthy). In absolute auslaut y is somewhat palatal, also before ; and h. Before frontal consonants y is assimilated to n, before labial con- sonants to m. 6. Frontal consonants: n (Castilian mawana), t (voiceless lenis) ; t (glottalized), t' (aspirated), d (Eng. lano'ing, inflative d preplosively nasal), jl (Japanese roku), ts (Ger. zejin, but very lenis), fs (Ger. z, glottalized), s (Eng. saw), tf (Eng. chew, but lenis), tf (Eng. chew, glottalized), f (Eng. ship) (/» is the capital of f), n (Eng. now). 7. Labial consonants: p (voiceless lems), p (glottalized), p, (aspirated), b (Eng. lam&ent, voiced inflative b preplosively nasal), b (Castilian cafeallo), m (Eng. man). The sound of I is heard in some words of foreign origin, and in San Ildefonso polamimi, 'butterfly'. The consonants may also be classified as follows: Voiced constringents : j, w. Voiceless fricatives: h, s, f. Voiceless fricatives labialized : qw* X BUREAU OF AMERICAN" ETHNOLOGY [Brr.r. 56 Voiceless lenis sonoplosive clusives, labialized: kw. Voiceless glottalized clusives: k, f, p. Voiceless lenis affricative clusives: ts, if. Voiceless glottalized affricative clusives: ts, ff. Voiceless aspirate clusives: k\ t\ p'. Voiced inflative clusives, preplosively nasal: g, d, b. Voiced levis clusives: g, ./, t>. Voiced nasals: y, %, n, m. The following phoneme are consonant diphthongs: qw, kw,ts, fs,tf, ff, g, d, and b. In the glottalized clusives (k, t, ts, ff, ft) the glottal plosion follows the oral plosion, even following the glided or sukuned s and / of Ihe consonantal diphthongs. That is, the k,t,ts, tf, or p is completely immersed in a glottal elusive. It has been deter- mined that, at least in many instances, g and g, d and d, b and ft are respectively but two aspects of the same phonem, as is the case with Castilian g and levis g, d and levis d, b and levis b. The consonants occur in one length only. They may be more or less orinasal when contiguous to orinasal vowels. The sonancy of the voiceless lenis clusives begins nearly simultaneously with the explosion. A grave accent is placed over the vowel of a syllable weakly stressed. Strongly stressed syllables are unmarked. The intonation of the syllables is not indicated in this memoir. Phonetic Spelling op 1 non-Tewa Words The symbols used in Tewa have the same value as in Tewa. Sounds not occurring or not written in Tewa are indicated as follows: Vowels: a (French patte), a (French pas), w (unrounded u). The acute accent over a vowel indicates that it is loudly stressed. A circle under a vowel indicates that it is surd. Consonants: ' (aspiration), h (a peculiar weak aspiration occurring in Jemez), k (marginal or "velar'' k, lenis), q (Ger. a,ch), g, d, b (as in Eng.); f (bilabial/) after a consonant symbol indicates palatal- ized or palatal quality. ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS By Junius Henderson and John Peabody Harrington 1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS r ~T'HE fauna of a region, like its flora and geology, bears an inti- mate relation to the culture of its human inhabitants. 2 A nomadic people is generally of necessity dependent on ani- mal life for sustenance, wlrile a sedentary people, if numerous, remaining for a long period in permanent habitations, must be dependent more largely on direct products of the soil, except perhaps when living on the seashore, where almost inexhaustible fisheries furnish abundant food, or near the range of such animals as the caribou or the now nearly extinct American bison. A large number of people remaining constantly in one place and depending the year round on the game of the region would soon destroy their food supply. A nomadic tribe, wandering hither and thither, is constantly pene- trating new game preserves and allowing the game in the old pre- serves to increase in abundance. The ancient peoples, the remains of whose dwellings are found so abundantly in the country of the Tewa Indians, northwest of Santa Fe, New Mexico, were surely too numerous to have derived any considerable part of their sustenance for even a few months from the native mammals, birds, and other animals of the region, even if game were much more abundant than now, a condition winch may well be doubted. If the simultaneous occupancy of only a small pro- portion of the ruins be supposed, there still would not have been enough game to support the population. However, it is probable that wild game formed an important supplement to the products of their cornfields and the native plants. Bandeher 3 says of the region about the Rito de los Frijoles : Game of all kinds, deer, elk, mountain sheep, bears, and turkeys, roamed about the region in numbers, and the brook afforded fish. In a footnote he adds: All the kinds of game mentioned were abundant around the Rito de los Frijoles in former times, but the communal hunts of the Pueblos, and later on the merciless slaughter of the Apaches, have greatly reduced it. 1 The ethnological portion of this memoir is the work of Mr. Harrington, the zoological, that of Pro- fessor Henderson. 2 Springer, Frank, The Field Session of the School of American Archaeology, Sciencf, n. s., xxxn, 623, 1910. 3 Bandelier, A. F., Final Report of Investigations among the Indians of the Southwestern United States, Carried on Mainly in the Years from 1880 to 18S5,Partrr, Papers Archxol. Inst. Amer., Arner.ser., tv, 141, 1892. ] 2 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY r bull. 56 Speaking of the region south of Santa Fe, Morrison l says: Black, cinnamon, and occasionally grizzly bear, black and white-tailed deer, and i urkc-vs, furnish abundant game to the Indian. The elk, once very plentiful in these mountains, is now very rarely seen. Other statements of like nature may be found. It is certain that since the advent of the wliite man with his death-dealing rifle large game animals have greatly decreased in numbers nearly everywhere. Any reduction in the abundance of game in the area under discussion is probably due to promiscuous hunting at all seasons by both whites and Indians supplied with rifles, rather than to the communal hunts of the Pueblo Indians or to the raids of roving Apache. Careful consideration of all the facts bearing on the question leads to the conclusion that game never was very abundant about the Rito de los Frijoles. However this may be, it seems certain that it could not have remained abundant when the vicinity was occupied by the ancient inhabitants and still have furnished them with a large part of their food supply. In his excellent paper on Pueblo environment, Hough 2 says : It is difficult to realize the immense modification of animal and vegetable life which the white man has wrought in this region during the 30 years of his active occupancy. At the beginning of this period the region was well grassed and supplied with other vegetation adequate to the needs of vast herds of antelope, elk, and deer; rodent ani- mals and birds were plentiful, and carnivores had abundance of prey. As a result of vegetation a humus had formed on all protected situations, rainfall was absorbed and equalized in distribution, and the terrific denudation which gashes the land at pres- ent was not begun. The country was adapted to grazing and especially favorable on account of tempera- ture and latitude, and at once great herds of cattle, horses and sheep were introduced from Texas where the range had failed. The result was that the range became over- stocked, the grass disappeared under the tongues and hoofs of myriads of domestic animals, shrubs and trees were browsed and destroyed or swept away by fires, from certain regions species of plants vanished, and the land lay bare to the augmented winds and torrential rains. Trails became profound arroyos and the humus van- ished in the streams and the surface of the country was stone, sand and gravel. Not the least of this baneful influence was the drying up of springs and other sources of water, and more than one observer collected data going to prove the progressive desicca- tion of the pueblo region. These facts must be borne in mind in discussion of the environment of the Southwest . As an example, it may be stated that in the explora- tion of one ancient pueblo at Window, Arizona, the bones of 37 species of animals were taken from the house refuse ; it is not probable at present that a naturalist could collect 5 of these species from the environment. Wherever the explorer's spade has been put in the ancient ruins, facts of this character come to his notice, even if he has not heard the story from the early settlers or Indian traditionists. While the baneful influence of overstocking the range and other follies of white settlers in parts of the West and the Southwest i Executive and Descriptive Report of Lieutenant Charles C. Morrison, Sixth Cavalry, on the Opera- tions of Party No. 2, Colorado Section, Field Season of 1877, in Ann. Rep. U. S. Oeog. Expl. and Sutv. W. 100th M< rid., for 1878, p. 137, 1 sTs. - Hough, Walter, Pueblo Environment, Proc. Amer. Asso. Adv. Sci., 55th meeting, 1906, pp. 450-51. habmngton] ETHNOZOOLOGV OF THE TEWA INDIANS % can not be ignored, the effects are but local. Vast areas in the South- west have never been subjected to the ravages of large domestic herds, because from the time the region was first explored the lack of water has prohibited the use of many such areas for extensive grazing pur- poses. A study of the literature of early exploration does not indi- cate general distribution of vast herds of antelope, elk, and deer, and especially is this true of elk. Certainly within the period desig- nated (30 years immediately preceding 1906) there has been no gen- eral distribution of large game in great herds, although antelope and deer have been abundant locally and are still common in places. It may be said of the species of animals whose bones have been taken from various pueblos that many of them may have been so rare that a naturalist might search the region for a year without seeing one. The bones represent the accumulated results of many hunting expe- ditions, more or less extensive, besides the daily hunting of many men for generations. An elk rib was taken from an ancient pueblo northwest of Santa Fe, yet old men from two neighboring pueblos say they have never seen an elk. Likewise the bison was known to many of the old Indians in the upper Rio Grande valley, although they had never seen one alive. It is exceedingly probable that the important species inhabiting the Tewa region during the ancient occupancy were the same as at present, except the elk and mountain sheep, which have disappeared. The bison, no longer known in New Mexico in a wild state, was not found, perhaps, in this part of the Rio Grande valley and could be obtained only by barter or by long excursions through a country inhabited by hostile tribes. Though the present report lists a large number of animals for the region, a critical analysis shows that very few of them could have been important as a source of food. In this connection the invertebrates may be almost wholly dis- regarded, though possibly in seasons of unusual abundance grass- hoppers may have been a much-relished addition to the bill of fare; they were certainly much used farther west. It must be remembered, however, that invasions of these pests in sufficient numbers to make them important as a source of food for a large population would mean the destruction of the corn crops and of the grass and other vegeta- tion on which the game animals feed, thus reducing the supply of the ordinary food of the human inhabitants. There were undoubtedly fish in all the important streams, but they could not have been numerous enough to have played a large part in sustaining the number of people who lived in the region, even if the latter were no more numerous than at the time of the Spanish conquest. Reptiles and amphibians may be wholly disregarded, as they do not occur in sufficient numbers to be important, though of course with a more abundant water supply there would have been more frogs. Most of 4 BUKKAlf OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 the species of birds and mammals which occur abundant ly are altogether too small and too difficult to obtain with crude weapons to be useful as food. Among the birds in this class may be men- tioned nut hat dies, hummingbirds, goldfinches, and sparrows. Robins and longcrested jays are also common, but a single meal for a fair- sized clan would require all that are to be found in any one canyon. Pirion and Woodhouse's jays and mourning doves are abundant, probably as numerous now as they ever were, but not easy to secure even with modern weapons, and may be almost ignored as food birds for primitive people. Hawks, owls, and eagles are all too pare and too hard to obtain to be considered. During the autumn grouse and turkeys were probably obtainable in considerable numbers, and, with the ducks and other water birds along the river, constituted the on\y really important food birds of the region. In case of the mammals, not infrequently a deer, elk, bear, or mountain sheep must have been obtained. With hundreds of people living on the mesas and in neighboring canyons, all constantly seeking to catch or kill these animals for food, we can not suppose their existence in much greater numbers than at present, when, though hunted with more effective weapons, they surely are not here hunted as persistently or by very many people. The same is true of the rabbits and squirrels. While they must have had constantly a small supply of such game, when the number of mouths awaiting it is considered, the meat diet of these ancient people was surely very limited. The other mammals were either too small or too rare to add materially to the food supply. This region is almost undisturbed by civilization and therefore affords an excellent field for the naturalist as well as for the study of ethnozoology. There seems no good reason for supposing any great change in the fauna of the locality since the period of its occu- pancy by the people who constructed the pueblos and other dwellings long ago abandoned. Changes in faunas usually progress slowly, notwithstanding such conspicuous examples of rapid extermination or of introduction of species as are afforded by the bison, the passenger pigeon, and the English sparrow in America. Such examples, due to the superior facilities for destruction or introduction developed by the white race, are abnormal. It is quite possible that a few species besides elk and mountain sheep have disappeared from the vicinity within the period of human occupancy and that some others have extended their range into tins area, though there is no evidence of such changes. The topography is certainly virtually the same as it has been for a \ cry long period. If there has beef) since the "beginning of human occupancy a general desiccation of the count in- sufficient to reduce the possibilities in the line of agriculture, it would not necessarily have produced much, if any, change in the iikxi.kiis.,x "I ETHNOZOOLOCV OF THE TEWA INDIANS 5 HABRINGTONJ native uncultivated flora, and without considerable change in topog- raphy and flora there would be little change in the fauna. 1 In event of such desiccation some local migrations of species sug- gest themselves as possible. During August the writers found no blackbirds or meadowlarks on the mesas or in the canyons examined and conditions are not favorable to their regular presence there, but with somewhat greater precipitation moist meadows may have pro- vided a suitable habitat for the redwings and cultivated upland areas near water may have attracted the meadowlarks. Both are now found in favorable localities in the Rio Grande valley. In a paper hereinafter cited Mrs. Bailey says that in San Miguel county the meadowlark occurs only in depressions in the plains where there is water. The limited distribution of water restricts the habitat of ducks and shore birds, winch once may have been more generally distributed. To understand fully the culture of a region it is necessary to know something of the native animals, especially those which have been useful to the people or which would have been noticed by them. The flesh of animals furnishes food, the skins provide raiment, thongs, and other useful products, and bones furnish awls and other imple- ments; but perhaps even more important, from the cultural point of view, is the fact that animals enter largely into the mythology and religion of primitive peoples. The finding, in the ruins, of. bones other than human may fairly be assumed to indicate that the animals to which they belonged were used by the former inhabitants for utilitarian, ornamental, or ceremonial purposes. In most cases the character of the animals, the condition of the bones, or the cir- cumstances under which found suggests a marked probability as to the particular use. The culture, religion, and language of living peoples who are believed to be either directly descended from or closely related to the ancient inhabitants surely must throw much light on the subject. A large quantity of bones has been taken from the rums of the Pajarito plateau, but the work of identification has not yet been completed. It is not likely that in the use of animals for food the ancient inhabitants of this region differed much from those of northeastern Arizona. Discussing the bones found in the latter region, Hough 2 says : The remains show that moot of the animals of the region were consumed as food; but, as might be anticipated, bones of the carnivora are much rarer than those of the herbivora, the latter represented by deer and rabbit species, and the former by the fox, coyote, wolf, dog, raccoon, badger, wildcat, and puma, but no bones of the bear 1 see Bulletins 54 and SS of the. Bureau of American Ethnology. 2 Hough, Walter, Areheological Field Work in Northeastern Arizona (The Museum-Gates Expedition of 1901), Ann. Rep. U. S. Nat. Mm. for 1901, pp. 356-57, L903, (') BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 50 were observed. Remains of the beaver and small rodents, anil bones of birds, espe- cially the turkey, eagle, hawk, and owl, were noted. Remains of the dog and turkey were found in nearly every ruin, showing the extent of the domestication of these animals in this region. So far as can be deter- mined, the don and turkey were the only animals domesticated by the pueblo tribes. It. was hoped that light might have been thrown upon the question of domestication of other animals, namely, the deer [citing Nadaillac] and an auchenia (llama), as affirmed by dishing from figurines found on the Rio Salado, in Southern Arizona. The writer has copied numerous pictographs in the valley of the Little Colorado River showing unmistakably the herding of turkeys and of deer by men. . . . Still, the evidence presented so far as to the domestication of other animals than the dog and turkey is unsatisfactory. Zoological field work was conducted for slightly less than four weeks in the neighborhood of El Rito de los Frijoles in August, 1910, so that this account can not be considered in any sense a final discus- sion of the fauna of the vicinity. Collection and observation were conducted chiefly in the lower part of the Rito de los Frijoles canyon and on adjacent mesas, but included a two-day trip to the Painted Cave and a three-day trip to the top of the Jemez Mountains and edge of Valle Grande, just beyond the headwaters of the Rito, so that a general impression of the fauna from the top of the mountains to the rim of the Rio Grande canyon was obtained. Judge A. J. Abbott, who now lives at El Rito de los Frijoles, Mr. Nathan Dowell, who has hunted and trapped in the region, and several of the Indians employed in the archeological excavations have furnished much infor- mation, which a short summer trip could not disclose. Tn case of the birds especially only observations carried through the four sea- sons could make it possible to secure a list even approximately com- plete, on account of the number of migratory species which must visit the vicinity. Obviously the birds seen were all either permanent or summer residents, winter residents and spring and autiwnn* migrants being then absent. To the list have been added such species as have been recorded for the Rio Grande valley between the Colorado line and a point sotithwestward from Santa Fe, so far as they could be noted in the limited examination of the literature which has been possible. Time has not permitted as full an examination of the zoologic literature of the region as is desirable, and much informa- tion is hidden in works whose titles do not suggest at all the inclusion of Any thing zoologic. The region is within the southern extremity of the great Rocky Mountain system. Northward, mountains extend in unbroken chains through Colorado. Southward, instead of continuous chains there are isolated mountain masses separated by dry mesas and plains. Consequently the affinities of the fauna as a whole are with the moun- tain fauna of Colorado. The great majority of species are found northward to or through Colorado. A few, as As/imimrlla , are of distinctly southern type. harr^oton] ETHNOZOOLOGY OP THE TEWA INDIANS 7 It was hoped to do a large amount of ethnozoologic work while in the field. Unforeseen circumstances prevented this except for a few hours of the last two days of the field season. Mr. Harrington, how- ever, was able to do some independent work along that line in con- nection with his regular studies of the language of the Tewa. The Indian names given are in the San Juan dialect of the Tewa language, except where otherwise stated. The greater part of the discussion of methods in ethnobotany in Bulletin 55 applies with equal force to ethnozoology and needs not be repeated here. Most of the animal names were obtained by exhibiting specimens to several Indians, including some of the older men of the tribe. Where specimens in hand were not available, care was taken to make sure of the identity of the animals named ; this was easy, of course, in case of such readily described animals as the porcupine. In a few cases it was considered safe to use good colored plates figuring easily identified species; but wherever possible specimens in hand were exhibited and also the same species alive in their natural habitat. Where there is a question as to identity the name is either omitted or the doubt is expressed. It is always best to show informants also specimens of all species in the region which closely resemble one another and discover whether they really definitely distinguish them, and, if so, how. Care should always be taken not to suggest to them the answer to inquiries. It is frequently said by unthinking or uninformed persons, who know something of the Indians' intimate knowledge of some phases of nature, that the American Indians know and have names for every species of plant and animal living in their vicinity. Inasmuch as some microscopic forms exist everywhere and as many macroscopic forms of invertebrates, as some insects, crustaceans, and mollusks, can be distinguished only by microscopic characters, the incorrect- ness of that idea is evident. The Indians are usually correct in dis- tinguisliing the larger and better-marked species of birds and mam- mals, but they certainly do not recognize some of the minute differ- ences which are of more importance than some of those more easily observed. They distinguish species more closely than the average 4 white man who has not had zoologic training. Though several species of jackrabbits and several cottontails inhabit the region over which these Indians have roamed, they seem to recognize but one species of each. However, the majority of white men could not do more. The Pueblo Indians who claim the Jemez Plateau as the home of their ancestors are agriculturists, not hunters, though they do some hunt- ing, of course, just as white farmers do. It would be interesting and important to make a thorough comparative study of the knowledge of natural history possessed by agricultural tribes and hunting tribes. 69231°— Bull. 56—14 2 8 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BULL. 56 To insure accuracy, such a study, as is true, indeed, of all ethno- zoological and ethnobotanical work, should be cooperative, trained zoologists, botanists, and ethnologists working together in the field. Indians differ as much individually as do other races in their capacity, experience, and opportunity for observation and in their interest in the mysteries of Nature. One person may have had abundant opportunity for the observation of the various species of deer, but paying slight attention to the little chipmunks and hence not distinguislring the different kinds of the latter, while with another person the reverse may be the case. Hence the information obtained from a single informant may not at all represent the knowledge or ideas of his people. This makes it advisable whenever possible to check the information obtained by enlisting the services of several informants. It is too early for sweeping generalizations, but a few general remarks seem safe. Indian nomenclature as a whole recognizes differences, not relationships. There is little, if any, evidence of the classification by the Indian of species in consanguineous groups, as orders, families, and genera, except in very obvious cases. Whether he does so arrange them in his mind, even though he does not express the idea in his nomenclature, is very doubtful and should be more fully investigated. In such investigations there is always danger of recording opinions which have been more or less influenced by con- tact with whites, a contingency which should be guarded against. In most cases a species is perhaps considered a distinct entity, not connected with any other species. However, their recognition of several kinds of bear, deer, etc., may indicate some sort of an idea of genetic relationship which further study may elucidate. A thorough knowledge of the language is necessary to a real under- standing of this subject. The writers found them using the English word "rat" for several species of squirrels and chipmunks, yet in their own language they have usually distinct names for each. Such cases as the bear, to which the Mohave in their own language apply a name meaning "great badger", should be followed up to ascertain whether it indicates a supposed relationship. It may well be doubted whether the use by the Hopi of the same name for such distinct species as the Harris ground-squirrel and Say's ground-squirrel, and with slightly different pronunciation for two small chipmunks, indicates a failure to distinguish them. Our San Ildefonso informants, while applying the same name to such different species as Say's ground-squirrel and the little chipmunk, showed clearly by their comments that they did not consider them the same species. The solution of the problem requires a determination of the Indian's conception of species, if he has any, which is not a simple task. Europeans and their American descendants have been familiar for hakkington] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEW A INDIANS 9 generations with modern scientific ideas of species, their interrela- tions, and the development of various groups of species from com- mon sources. In discussing such matters, one's words, whether one speaks in his own language or attempts to apply a primitive language, represent definite mental concepts, but may convey to primitive people, who have not such concepts, ideas quite foreign to those intended. So also we are in constant danger of uncon- sciously injecting our own concepts into the words used by our informants in expressing their ideas. It is exceedingly difficult to question them about abstract ideas without framing the queries so as to suggest one's own views and thus color the replies. Care must be taken to avoid mistaking descriptive or comparative terms for names. When an Indian informant is shown a foreign species with which he is not familiar, he may, as is the case with a representative of any other race, designate it by what appears to be a name but which on analysis proves to be a descriptive or com- parative word or phrase and not a native name for the species, as when a small white marine shell is exhibited and a word is applied which means that it looks like bone. That the Indians have been close observers of animals is shown by the fact that they have developed names for almost all the parts of birds and mammals, as claws, whiskers, foot-pads, etc. If work in ethnozoology is to be maintained on a scientific basis and an accurate estimate made of the Indian's knowledge of Nature, definite determinations of the species of plants and animals discussed must be made. Much of the work hitherto done in obtain- ing the names of plants and animals has been worthless, because no attempt was made to discover and record with certainty the kind of plants and animals to which the names are applied. Much more important than mere nomenclature is the idea of which nomen- clature is but an attempted expression. The best way certainly is to get the information in the field, so far as possible by showing the Indian informants the animal in its natural environment. Specimens thus identified and discussed should then be scientifically identified and preserved for future reference. CLASSIFICATION OF ANIMALS There is no word meaning 'animal'. 'Animarj or 'animal (|>. cit., pp. 56 58. 2 Ibid., pp. 104-05. 3 Osgood, Wilfred II., Revision of I he Mice of 1 he American Genus Peromyscus. North American Fauna, no. 28, Biol. Sury., U. S. Dept Agr., pp. 72-74, 1909. 'Ibid., pp. 126 26. » Ibid., pp. 16o-ti9. HAUKI HENDE ^ls] ETHNOZOOLOGV OF THE TEWA INDIANS 21 When questioned as to their habits the Indians said these mice "get young in the spring, the same as horses and cows, and give them milk just the same." Mus musculus Linn. Domestic Mouse. tywyy. Epimys norvegicus (Erxl.). Domestic Rat. It is said that there are no domestic rats in New Mexico. Domestic mice are as common in Indian houses as in those of Mexicans and Americans. These mice are called ratones in New Mexican Spanish. 'Ojo ( ? akin to Taos pajand, Islet a pat fare, Castor canadensis frondator Mearns). Castor canadensis frondator Mearns. Broad-tailed Beaver. The Tewa sometimes call the beaver po' } ojo, 'water beaver' (po\ water; 'ojo, beaver). Whites and Indians both report beaver along the Rio Grande, probably of this species; but the lateral canyons in the neighborhood of El Rito de los Frijoles support none now, if they ever did. The beaver was hunted and eaten by the Tewa, and its use as food is said by them to have no ill effect. % Marmota flaviventer (Aud. & Bach). Western Woodchuck. None were seen and no information concerning them in our area was obtained. Reported at Santa Fe by Coues and Yarrow. 1 Kv. Cynomys gunnisoni (Baird). Gunnison's Prairie Dog. None found at El Rito de los Frijoles, but abundant at Valle Grande in the Jemez Mountains, just beyond the head of the Rito. The Indians report prairie dogs also at San Ildefonso and other points along the Rio Grande. The bark of the lei' is well imitated by Tewa men. They say : lei' n/itu, "the prairie dog speaks or gives his cry" (lei', Cynomys gunnisoni (Baird); nq,, it; tu, to speak). ? Citellus tridecemlineatus pallidus (Allen). Striped Spermophile. Citellus tridecemlineatus Mitch, was reported at Tierra Amarilla by Coues and Yarrow. 2 This record should probably be referred to the subspecies pallidus, which is found north of that locality in Colorado. So'w%. Citellus grammurus (Say). Rock Squirrel. This large, speckled, bushy-tailed ground squirrel, its body a foot long, is abundant in the canyons about El Rito de los Frijoles. It is recognized by the Indians as a ground squirrel, with habits distinct 1 Coues, Elliott, and Yarrow, H. C, op. cit., p. 123. - Ibid., p. 120, 22 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 from those of tree squirrels, Three of them said that it sheds its hair in April and May, that the hair begins to thicken in July, and that late in August it gets "nice, warm hair, to fix up for the winter." The accuracy of some of the dates may be doubted. This ground squirrel damages their provisions. The Tewa eat the flesh, but do not use the skin. Callos pernio philus lateralis (Say). Say's Ground Squirrel, "Big Chipmunk' ' . Common in the Jemez Mountains, about the headwaters of El Rito de los Frijoles, but not seen by us on the mesas or hi the canyons which cut them. Easily recognized by lateral yellowish stripe and black stripe; it is smaller than pine squirrel. Said to be common throughout the mountains of northern New Mexico. Our Indian informants recognized the species, distinguishing it from the other squirrels by its appearance, its habits, and its habitat, though they gave them the same name. They say it is restricted to the mountains and correctly consider it a ground squirrel. It is used by them for food. Kuwije. Eutamias quadrivittatus (Say). Four-lined Colorado Chipmunk. Abundant in the canyons, in the mountains, and along the edges at least of the mesas. The Indians use it for food and are quite familiar with its range and habits. Recognized by its small size and the alternating light and dark stripes on the back. Sq'wsz. Sciurus aberti Woodhouse. Abert's Tufted-ear Squirrel. This is the finest squirrel of the region, as large as the rock squirrel, gray above, white beneath, with long and very bushy tail, its long leaps from tree to tree never failing to excite the utmost admiration. We found it only among the big rock pines on the mesas, where it is rather common. It was long ago reported at Santa Fe by Coues and Yarrow, 1 and from Santa Fe to Taos by Coues and Allen.- It is eaten by the Indians. The tufts of hah* on the ears are called % QJep'o, 1 ear hairs ' . So'w%. Sciurus fremonti And. & Bach. Fremont's Chickaree, "Pine Squirrel". Abundant in the Jemez Mountains. Our Indians declared that it occurs only among the firs and spruces, a statement well founded but too sweeping. Although almost universally called "pine squirrel" in Colorado, it is found in various parts of that State much more commonly among the firs and spruces anil not abundant among the rock pines. In X( w Mexico in ascending the canyon of El Rito de ' Coues, Elliott, and Yarrow, H. < ., op. eit., p. 115. 2 Coues, Elliott, an I Mien, J. A., Monographs of North American Bodentia, Final Rip- U.S. Geol.Surv. Ten., xi, pp. 7:;; 38, LS77. HENDEH HARR inotox] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 23 los Frijoles we encountered the first one where we first found firs, about 2 miles above the house of Judge Abbott, but he says it occa- sionally is seen downstream as far as his ranch. Allen 1 has described a subspecies (Sciurus fremonti neomexicanus) from the eastern slopes of the Taos Mountains in Colfax and Moro Counties, "very different from specimens from central and northern Colorado," but he records a specimen from Chama, which he refers to fremonti. Our specimens from the Jemez Mountains, collected in August, 1910, were found to be slightly redder than specimens taken in northwestern Colorado in August, 1909, but possibly the latter had faded a trifle. Though smaller than some others, this is the best food squirrel in the region. Po'tse ,e . Lutra canadensis (Schreber). Canadian Otter. Po-tse ,e . Lutra canadensis sonora Rhoads. Sonoran Otter. Mr. Dowell, who has trapped extensively in the region, says the otter occurs along the Rio Grande near by. The Indians confirm this, and fragments of otter skin are worn by them. Without speci- mens for identification we can not know which form it is. Je\ ■ ? Mustela arizonensis Mearns. Mountain Weasel. Weasels are reported at San Ildefonso by the Indians, but we have no specimens for identification. Coues and Yarrow 2 reported Puio- rius longicauda Merriam at Taos, but this region seems more likely to be within the range of arizonensis, much more recently described. Mustela streatori leptus Merriam may also extend into northern New Mexico. Hodge gives Dye-tdoa as "Gopher" clans of San Juan, Santa Clara, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque, and Ye-tdoa as "Lizard" clans of San Juan and San Ildefonso. Lutreola vison energumenos Bangs. Western Mink. Mr. Dowell says mink occur along the Rio Grande near El Rito de los Frijoles. ? Martes caurina origenes (Rhoads). Rocky Mountain Marten. Hodge states that Bandelier gives a "Marten" clan as existing at San Juan pueblo. Coues and Yarrow 3 recorded Mustela americana Turton from Taos. That is a species of the north. It is likely the more recently described southern form. 1 Allen, J. A., Revision of the Chickarees, or North American Red Squirrels (Subgenus Tamiasciurus), Bull.Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., x, pp. 291-94, 1898. 2 Coues, Elliott, and Yarrow, H. C, op. cit., p. 59. 'Ibid., p. 61. 69231°— Bull. 56—14 a 24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 Ee'a. Taxidea taxus Schreber. Badger. Hodge gives as Badger clans of va'rious pueblos: San Juan, Keya- tdoa; Santa Clara, Ked-tdda; San [ldefonso, Kea-tdoa; Jemez, Son- sadsh; Pecos, So'hl + ; Laguna, Ch6pi-hdno ch ; Sia, Tyupi-hdno; Zuni, Tonashi-kwe. We found no badgers nor their holes at El Rito de los Frijoles, and could learn of none. At the old Buckman sawmill, at the base of the Jemez Mountains, we chased two into their hole, but did not get them. Two of the Indians told, with much glee, of the fighting qualities of this animal and its great energy in digging. They told also of how a badger caught one of them by the trousers and held on until it was dragged a long distance to the river and into the water. Mephitis mesomelas varians Gray. Long-tailed Texas Skunk. The Indians report striped skunks at San lldefonso, which appears to be within the probable range of this species. We learned of no spotted skunks, though the region is between the known range of the Rocky Mountain species (Spilogale tenuis Howell) and that of the Great Basin species (Spilogale gracilis saxatilis Merriam), so one or the other probably occurs within our area. Skunk skins are used by the Tewa for ceremonial purposes. Ke' (akin to Taos koaand, Isleta Tcoaire, bear). Bear (any species). Ursus horribilis Ord. Grizzly Bear. Ursus horribilis horrixus Baird. Sonora Grizzly. Ursus americanus Pallas. Black Bear. The Jemez name is Fwdlq; the Cochiti name is lc6haju, the Hopi name honau'w. Hodge gives as Bear clans at various pueblos: San Juan and Nambe, Ke-tdoa; Hano, Ke-towa; Pecos, Whalatddsh; Aeoma, Kuwhaia-hdnoq ch ; Sia, Kohai-hdno; San Felipe, Kohai-hdno; Cochiti, Kuhaia-hdnuch; Zuni, Aihshi-kwe. As is usually the case, the hunters interviewed, white as well as Indian, were not sufficiently familiar with the species of bear to give definite information. Whites talked about black, brown, ami cin- namon bears, all of which refer to color phases of the black bear, which is not at all uncommon in the region. We occasionally saw bear tracks. The Indians vaguely described five kinds of bear: ke' fsse ,, i H hehsenu'i H , 'big white bear' (ke- , bear; tsse' , white; helisenu, big); Ice' fsse-'i'* tf%''i H , 'little white bear' (Tee', bear; teas', white; tfsp, little); ke' tse'j\ H , 'yellow bear' (Ice', bear; fee', yellow); ke' y dwV l , 'brown bear' (ke', hear; '<_/, brown); ke' p i e;r)di , \ 'black bear' (ke', bear: p'py, black). As this region is within the range of the grizzly, the "white bear" may refer to either horribilis or its subspecies 'ftorriseus, more likely HE»r>F,RSON HAfcttiXGTO: ' v ] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 25 the former. It is notable that Lewis and Clark and other early explorers in the West called the grizzly the white bear. It is to be noted that there is but one Indian name for the bear, in spite of the fact that they describe five kinds, a nomenclature paralleled in many other languages of the Southwest. Bandelier 1 says in his Final Report: The bear makes great havoc among the pifion trees. Climbing into the tops for the nuts, he tears off entire limbs and generally ruins the tree. Three kinds of bears are spoken of by the Indians and the Spanish settlers: The silver-tip (Platiado, Ko-ha-yo Kash-ya), the brown bear (Oso Colorado, Ko-ha-yo Ke-han-ye), and the black bear (Oso prieto, Ko-ha-yo MohZ-na-ka-nyi). Bandelier doubted the identity of the "silver-tip" with the grizzly, because he did not believe the latter species was found in tins area. The Indian word-forms quoted are presumably in the Cochiti dialect of the Keres language. Po'musa, 'water cat' (po', water; musa, house cat). See mush, page 29. Procyon lotor Linn. Raccoon. The "coon" is said to occur in the Rio Grande Canyon, near the mouth of El Rito de los Frijoles and elsewhere. Russell 2 gives va'owok as the Pima name for this species, and says: The raccoon is said to be used for food, though the writer did not see any cf the animals or any of their skins during a stay of a year and a half in Arizona. Tse (akin to Taos tsuland, dog). Domestic Dog. The Isleta call the dog qwianiie, the Jemez k^any,, the Hopi poJcd, the Zuni wdtsita. There is some direct and much indirect evidence that domesticated dogs were widely distributed among the North American Indians before the landing of Columbus. The fact that all Indian languages which have come to our attention contain native names for the dog, distinct from that applied to the coyote, wolf, and fox, is significant. No less significant is the fact that the names for the horse and other animals introduced by the whites are either newly coined words of de- scriptive meaning, modifications of the names for some other animal, or adaptations of the names used by white men. The Indians of the Southwest, including the Pueblos,, are not exceptions. They have native names for the dog, while their names for the horse are either descriptive, compound, or derived from the Spanish. Possibly an examination of early Spanish documents relating to the Southwest would develop direct statements in regard to dogs found in possession of the natives at their earliest contact with the whites, but lack of present access to the literature as well as lack of time prevent us from going far into the subject. i Bandelier, A. F., op. (it., p. 1.50, note. 2 Russell, Frank, The Pima Indians, Twenty-sixth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amcr. Ethn.. p. 82, 1908. 26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 The hairless dogs of Mexico, Peru, and South America, of several kinds, existed there when the Spaniards landed, according to various accounts. 1 All Peruvian dogs are said to have been derived from the Inca shepherd dog. 2 The Eskimo dog was described as early as 1647, and in various parts of the north polar region, races or tribes have developed quite different systems of calls for the direction of their dog teams, indicating long use. 3 The Flatheads, 4 Menomini, 5 and many other Indians mention dogs in their myths, but unless we know the age of the myths, which may have incorporated references to the dog after the invasion of the whites, they are of little value in this connection. The Pima have a myth giving the origin of the horse, 6 which was surely introduced. However, it is not likely that such a myth as the white dog and woman myth 7 could be so widespread unless very ancient. McGee 8 says : It is significant that the Dakota word for horse (suk-tay' '-ka or suy-ka'-wa-kay) is composed of the word for dog (suy'-ka), with an affix indicating greatness, sacredness or mystery . . . and that several terms for harness and other appurtenances correspond with those used for the gear of the dog when used as a draft animal. This terminology corroborates the direct evidence that the dog was domesticated by the Siouan aborigines long before the advent of the horse. Bones of dogs have been reported from the ancient kitchen-middens of the Atlantic coast, and bones of other animals apparently bearing the tooth-marks of dogs. 9 The De Soto expedition in 1539-1542, within half a century after the landing of Columbus, at an Indian village in the mountains of Georgia or South Carolina was "welcomed in a friendly manner, the Indians giving them a little corn and many wild turkeys, together with some dogs of a peculiar small species, which were bred for eating purposes and did not bark." 10 In the reports of the Coronado expedition to the Southwest from 1540 to 1542, the same period covered by De Soto in the Southeast, dogs were reported in abundant use as beasts of burden by the Indians of the Staked Plains and elsewhere. 11 1 Lockington, W. N., The Riverside Natural History, article on Carnivoree. 2 Brinton, Daniel (!., The American Race, p. 212, 1891. a Langkavel, B., Dogs and Savages, Smithsonian Rep. for 1898, p. (559-60, 1899. < 11. id., p. 651. ■'• Hoffman, Walter Jamas, The Menomini Indians, Fourteenth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ellin., pt. I, pp. 179-194, 1896. « Russell, Frank, The Pima Indians, Twenty-sixth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 241, 1908. 7 Dorsey, George A., and Kroeber, Alfred L., Traditions of the Arapaho, Pm6. no. 81, Field Columbian Mux, ii m, v, pp. 207-09, 1903. s McGee, W J, Siouan Indians, Fifteenth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., p. 174, 1897. 9 Marquis de Nadaillac, Pre-historic America, pp. 49-50, 535, 1895. WMooney, lames, Myths of i hi' Cherokee, Nineteenth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. i, p. 25, 1900 (quoting Ranjel). u Langkavel, B., op. cit., j>. 661. Winship, George I'arker, The Coronado Expedition, 1540-1542, Four- teenth Aim. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pt. I, pp. 401, 405, 504, 507, 527, 570, 578, 1896. HENDERSON HARRINGTO f N ] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 27 Fewkes ] reports: The ancient Hopi had a domestic dog which was a pet rather than a beast of burden. The good qualities of this ~et were recognized and recounted in their legends. Russell 2 says : The only domesticated animal which there is any certainty that the Pimas possessed at the time of the discovery is the dog. The old people say that in their youth the dogs were all alike and resembled coyotes. At present there are many small mon- grels, obtained principally from the Mexicans. Hough 3 says that "remains of the dog and turkey were found in nearly every ruin" in northeastern Arizona. Fewkes, in his account of certain Arizona ruins/ says : The occurrence of a skull of the domesticated dog in one of the graves at the Chaves Pass ruin is significant, showing that this animal was known to the ancients, and probably utilized by them. The fact that this dog was the broad-faced variety is particularly instructive. It was not apparently a domesticated coyote or a mongrel like those which now are so common in some of the pueblos. Lucas 5 gives the following account of this skull : Among the many objects obtained by Dr. Fewkes last summer from the ruined pueblo of Chaves Pass, Arizona, is the cranium of a domesticated dog, found in a grave with a human skeleton. Although the mere fact of a dog being discovered under such circumstances is in itself interesting, it is not at first sight remarkable, since it is well known that in America, as elsewhere, the dog was domesticated at an early date, and Clavijero mentions an ancient dog which he calls "a quadruped of the country of Cibola, similar in form to a mastiff, which the Indians employ to carry burdens." Aside from the fact that this is the first dog's cranium discovered by Dr. Fewkes, there are some points of special interest in the present case. Most of the Indian dogs are more or less wolfish in their aspect, and have long skulls, with comparatively low foreheads, thus showing a small degree of specialization in the way of breed, and this is true of such of the mummied dogs of Egypt as I have seen. The cranium of the Chaves dog, on the contrary, is of the broad-faced type, with high forehead, and, curiously enough, is precisely similar in size and proportions to the cranium of an Eskimo dog from Cumberland Sound, the resemblance extending to the peculiar concavity and squareness of the nasal region. While this is an interesting coincidence, it is not brought forward as implying community of origin, but as instancing long domestication in order that so well-marked a breed could be established. A curious confirmation of the early origin of this breed was received from San Marcos, Texas, where, in excavating for ponds, at the station of the U . S. Fish Commission, a human skeleton and bones of other animals were found in a layer containing many flint implements, overlaid by two feet of black soil. The bones were those of existing species, including teeth of several bison, and there was also a fragment of a dog's skull similar in size and proportions to that obtained at Chaves Pass. From the apparent general distribution of the dog, an animal particularly useful to primitive people throughout North America at a 1 Fewkes, J. Walter, Property-right in Eagles Among the Hopi, Amcr. Anthr., n. s., n, p. 706, 1900. 1 Russell, Frank, op. cit., p. 84. ' Hough, Walter, Archaeological Field Work in Northeastern Arizona: The Museum-Gates Expedi- tion of 1901, Ann. Rep. U. S. Nat. Museum for 1901, pp. 316, 326, 339, 356, 1903. 4 Fewkes, Jesse Walter, Two Summers' Work iu Pueblo Ruins, Twenty-second Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. £fftn.,pt.l,p. 27, 1904. s Lucas, F. A., A Dog of the Ancient Pueblos, Science, n. s., v, p. 544, 1897. 28 BUEEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOG1' [bull. 56 remote period, together with the existence of native names for dogs in the Pueblo dialects, it is practically certain that the ancient dwellers in the region had domesticated dogs. The difficulty of distinguishing the bones of some of the native dogs from those of the coyote has been emphasized by Coues. 1 Cross-breeding with various European dogs since the advent of the whites, in addition to cross-breeding with coyotes and possibly with wolves, has developed a mixed race which makes the subject a difficult one to study now. We have noticed the frequent occurrence of a yellowish short-haired variety of dog at San Juan pueblo. The Tewa give names of most varied meaning to their dogs. One dog at Santa Clara pueblo is named pw'e', "little jackrabbit." Tewa dogs are apt to lie in the outdoor adobe ovens, when these are not in use, if the openings are not closed in some way. Tsini (?ERsox 1 ETHN0Z00L0GY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 29 Gatschet * gives Tewa "koyo" erroneously as meaning coyote and compares it with Nahua coyotl. Hodge gives as Wolf clans of pueblos: Isleta, Tuim-t'ahun; Laguna, Kdk7ian-liano ch . The Tewa say that the gray wolf is very scarce now, but is still occasionally seen in the Taos mountains. It is common in many portions of New Mexico and is reported at Taos by Bailey. 2 Mu'jo'. ?Ked fox. The Tewa are familiar with a foxlike animal called my,'jo', al- though they say it is seldom seen. It is said to resemble the de' tsq,'yw%'H H (see below), but is of a dark brownish-yellow color. De- tsa-ywte-'i' 1 , 'blue coyote' (4e', coyote; tsccyw%-, blue, green). Urocyon cinereoargenteus scotti Mearns. Scott's Gray Fox, Pinon Fox. Coues and Yarrow 3 recorded Urocyon cinereo-argentateus Schreber from Taos, but the specimen was more likely scotti, a species more recently described. Mr. Nathan Dowell reports both the gray and the red fox at El Rito de los Frijoles, but we can not know just what species without specimens for identification. K%-yts%-, 'white mountain lion' (k'se'y, mountain lion; fsse-, white). Any kind of wildcat. The Southern Ute also have only one word for wildcat species: mosutukwUsi. The Southern Ute word meaning 'medicine man' appears to be related: mosutukwidto. The Tewa name may apply to a species of bobcat or lynx or per- haps to both a species of bobcat and a species of lynx. The inform- ants did not know the characters by which the bobcat and lynx are distinguished. We saw no k'y-ytsee,-, but saw the tracks of one near the Painted Cave. It is likely that either oaileyi or uinta would be found here, perhaps both, the former being an animal of the plains and the latter a mountain-loving animal. The name shows that this animal is closely associated with the mountain lion in the minds of the Tewa. Musd. Domestic Cat. This word in this or similar form appears in most of the languages of the Southwest, meaning introduced house cat. Compare also Tewa po'musd, raccoon. i Zwolf Sprachen aus dem Siidwesten Nordamerikas, Weimar, 1876, p. 26. 2 Bailey, Vernon, Wolves in Relation to Stock, Game, and the National Forest Reserves, Bull. No. 72, Forest Service, U. S. Dept. Agr., p. 12, 1907; Destruction of Wolves and Coyotes, Circular jVo. 63, Biol. Surv., U. S. Dept. Agr., p. 6, 1908. 3 Op. cit., Wheeler Survey, v, p. 56. 30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 House cats of many varieties are common at the Tewa pueblos. They are called to: 'musa, musa, musa.' They are sometimes given proper names, as dogs are. ICsc'y (akin to Isleta Vhnl'<\ mountain lion). Felis liippolestes Merriam. Rocky Mountain Cougar, Puma, Mountain Lion. The Southern Ute name for mountain lion is toku. The mountain lion is reported for this region by both whites and Indians. The Tewa say that the animal crouches or sits waiting for its prey. The carved figures of the " Stone Lions" shrine on the Pajarito plateau are identified by the Tewa as Vse'y, and the name of that place in the Tewa language is Vse'yda'gR'ydlwe, 'where the two mountain lions crouch' (Vse'y, mountain lion; d,a, they two; 'te-y, to sit, to crouch; 'iwe, locative). Hodge gives as Mountain Lion clans of various pueblos: San Juan and San Ildefonso, Ka n -tdoa; Nambe, Qe-td6a; Isleta, Kim-t'ainin; Pecos, Shiank'yd + ; Laguna, M6kaiqe]i-hdno ch ; Sia and San Felipe, Mokaiclh-hdno ; Cochiti, Molikacli-Jidnuch. Ksc'y. SuJcuFanj (suku, circus, N ] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 35 from chickens. Pi' or pi'ydi' applies to the domestic as well as to the wild turkey. The Isleta terms meaning 'turkey' exactly parallel the Tewa, diiude being the equivalent of Tewa di', and piendidude that of Tewa pi'yd'v . The Cochiti call turkey tsena. Hodge gives as Turkey clans of various pueblos: Pecos, P'etdelu'+; Laguna, Tsi'na-hdno ch ; Acoma, T$/na-hdnog ch ; Sia, Tst-hdno; San Felipe, Tsina-hdno; Santa Ana, Tsinha-Jidno; Cochiti, Tsi'n-Jiano; Zuni, Tona-Tcwe. The Mexicans hi New Mexico usually call the turkey gallo de la tierra, gallina de la tierra. Spanish guajalote is not applied to the turkey in New Mexico. Turkeys breed hi considerable numbers in the mountains. We saw 30 hi one flock at the edge of Valle Grande, just beyond the headwaters of El Kito de los Frijoles. They come down into the canyons in the autumn hi large numbers and congregate about the springs, where, it is said, they are slaughtered by the Mexicans. There is no doubt that they were formerly much more abundant than now and probably constituted an important article of food of the ancient inhabitants. The Indians long ago domesticated this bird, or, at any rate, kept many of them hi inclosures. It is sup- posed that the birds in capitivity were kept for ceremonial purposes, the feathers being used in various rites. This raises some doubt as to whether the captive birds were used also for food. One of the old men from Santa Clara pueblo said that the turkey is always silent, "never makes any noise." This shows a surprising lack of knowledge of the species. According to McCall, 1 60 years ago it "was found on almost every stream margined with timber, through- out the whole of the country traversed." Pi: Domestic fowl, Chicken. The name was originally applied to the wild turkey; see above. The cock or rooster is called either 4i' s CVi 'male chicken' (di', chicken; se;y, male) or gaju ( Bandelier, A. F., Final Report, VI- I, Papers Archxol. rust. A m Stevenson, M. ('., The Zuni Indians, Tw( niy-third A ran. Rep. Bur. A m Henshaw, II. W., op. cit.,p. 280. « Kennedy, C B. R., op. cit., p. 29. Mbid., p. 30. HENDERSON HARRI n|to N ] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 43 the name P. megalonyx at Pueblo Creek. Probably also by McCall, 1 P. arcticus, at Santa Fe. Zamelodia melanocephala (Swainson). Black-headed Grosbeak. A single pair raised a brood near camp at El Rito de los Frijoles ? Passer domesticus (Linn.). English Sparrow. Introduced into the territory since 1886. Apt to be found now in all the more important towns, but probably not in the uninhabited canyon and mesa regions; certainly unknown to the ancient inhab- itants. Iridoprocne bicolor (Vieillot). Tree Swallow. Tachycineta thalassina lepida Mearns. Northern Violet-green Swallow. Several times birds of one or the other of these two species were seen at El Rito de los Frijoles, but we could seldom get a good view of them. Our impression is that the latter was represented, and probably both. The former was reported by McCall 2 as nesting at Santa Fe. % Dendroica auduboni auduboni (Townsend). Audubon's Warbler. Common on August 20, 1910, at the foot of the Jemez Mountains, near the headwaters of El Rito de los Frijoles. Geothhjpis trichas occidentalis Brewster. Western Yellow-throat. Our Indian informants describe this species by its color, song, and habits, as a bird living along the Rio Grande in this region, and when shown a colored figure of it with pictures of other warblers they at once recognized it. Doubtless other species of the wood warbler family pass through in migration and probably some nest in this region, but no records are at hand. Jyy. Mimus polyglottos leucopterus (Vigors). Western Mockingbird. Reported near San Ildefonso by one of our Indian informants, who seemed quite familiar with the bird, knew the white man's name for it, and described its song as the song of all other birds combined. The whites report it at Santa Fe. Salpinctes ohsoletus obsoletus [Say]. Rock Wren. i MoCall, George A., op. cit., p. 218. 2 Ibid., p. 215. 44 BUREAU OP AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 50 One taken by us on the rim of the Rio Grande Canyon below the mouth of El Rito de los Frijoles. Reported abundant at Santa Fe by Henshaw. 1 ( 'aifu /'pes mexicanus cons per sus Ridgway. Canyon Wren. Common along all the canyon cliffs of this region. The song of the male, usually of about seven loud, ringing notes descending the scale, makes it the most noticeable of the wrens. Troglodytes aedon parkmani Audubon. Western House Wren. Common in the canyons and on the mesas. Sitta carolinensis nelsoni Mearns. Rocky Mountain Nuthatch. Common on the mesas and in the mountains. We saw none in the canyons cutting the mesas. Sitta piigmsea pygmsea Vigors. Pygmy Nuthatch. Abundant in the canyons, on the mesas, and in the mountains. This tiny species was everywhere to be found in numbers among the pines. Bseoloplms inornatus grisens (Ridgway). Gray Titmouse. Very common among the pifion pines and cedars on the mesas. % Penthestes gambeli gambeli (Ridgway). Mountain Chickadee. Very abundant in the canyons, on the mesas, and in the mountains. The type locality for this species is "about one day's journey west of Santa Fe," which would be not far from El Rito de los Frijoles. We saw no long-tailed chickadees (Penthestes eitricapiUus se ptentrionalis [Harris]). Myadestes townsendi (Aud.). Townsend's Solitaire. Common in the canyon at Painted Cave, 5 miles or more south of El Rito de los Frijoles. 1 1 glocicMa fuscescens salicicola Ridgway. Willow Thrush. A pair raised a brood at El Rito de los Frijoles in 1910. Recorded also from Pueblo Creek, near Taos Pueblo, in 1904, by Mrs. Bailey. 2 ? . Planesticus migratorius propinquus (Ridgway). Western Robin. Common in the canyons and in the mountains. i Henshaw. II. W., op. cil.. p. ISO. "- Bailey, Florenee Merriam, op. cit., pp. 317-ls. HE HARR RRi E NGT,y ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 45 Sialia mexicana bairdi Ridgway. Chestnut-backed Bluebird. Abundant everywhere on the mesas, but none in the canyons. Our Indian informants had noted the same fact. Palomd (e:y, bent), some kind of water bird. It has long legs and is seen along the Rio Grande. Probably a heron. Kwq:pije, 'toward rain' (kwfr, rain; pije, toward), a heron-like species of bird. K'd'sR-wi. A kind of blue bird seen in pinon trees. It is thought by the informant that Mexicans call it piflonero. TscVsg'*. A large kind of bird. T\'ife\ A species of large red bird. Puga. This is the bird which the Mexicans call gruUa. It is a large, buff-colored bird seen wading or walking by the river. When it migrates it flies in a V -shape, making at times a peculiar whirring or trilled noise which can be heard even though the birds be high in the air. Mrs. Stevenson l mentions the sandhill crane as known at Zuni. Hodge gives as Crane or Heron clans of various pueblos: Hano, Kapulo-towa (the Rio Grande Tewa do not know the word Jcapulo) ; Sia, Khuia-haiio; Znni, Kd'lokta-Jcwe. Reptiles The smaller lizards, especially the swifts, are very abundant throughout the region. Horned lizards (popularly called "horned toads") are by no means infrequent. The larger lizards are either not abundant or more adept at escaping observation. None, of the lizards found here arc poisonous. The only known poisonous lizards 1 Stevenson, M. ('., The Zniii Indians, Twenty-third Ann. Rep. But. Amer. Ethn.,j>. 292, 1904. Srb?ngton] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 47 of the New World appear to be the Gila monster and the Mexican beaded lizard, neither of which occurs in northern New Mexico. Among the snakes the only poisonous one known in the region is the rattlesnake. The wound made by any reptile or other animal having teeth capable of lacerating the epidermis or flesh may of course become infected, just as a scratch produced by any inorganic substance may, and thus create the impression that the poison was injected at the time of the bite. Our Indian informants considered the swifts and horned lizards harmless, but declared that the Sonora skink, of which a specimen was found by them, is poisonous. The Indians have the same so-called instinctive dread for the larger reptiles, par- ticularly snakes, as the whites, being startled when suddenly they come upon one, and disliking to handle them. Tbey informed us that neither snakes nor lizards are used as food at present by the Tewa, but it is not unlikely that their ancestors used them, at least during times of famine. However, they could not have been at any time more than an insignificant article of food. There appears to be a widespread belief that the Indians of the Southwest generally are addicted to the use of reptiles for food. Whatever may be true of the past, this is not the case now. Rus- sell's statement concerning the Pima Indians, 1 that "snakes are not eaten, even in times of famine, and the idea of eating lizards is repudiated with scorn," is applicable to many other Southwestern tribes. LIZARDS Crota phytus collaris baileyi (Stejneger) . Bailey's Collared Lizard . This fine lizard probably occurs throughout the region, though we saw none. C. collaris was reported at Santa Fe and San Ildefonso by Yarrow and Cope 2 long before the subspecies baileyi was de- scribed, but Stejneger 3 places our area within the range of baileyi and represents collaris as occurring from Pecos Valley eastward. % -— Holbrookia mnaculata maculata (Girard ) . Common Spotted Lizard . i Russell, Frank, The Pima Indians, Twenty-sixth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amcr. Ethn., p. S3, 1908. 2 Yarrow, II. C, Report upon the Collections of Batraehians and Reptiles made in Portions of Nevada, Utah, California, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona during the years 1871, 1872, 1873 and 1874, U. S. Geog. Explor. and Survey W. of 100th .Meridian, v, p. 566, 1875; Check-List of North American Reptilia and Batrachia, with Catalogue of Specimens in U. S. National Museum, Bull. U. S. Nat. Museum, no. 24, p. 52, 1882. Cope, E. D., The Crocodilians, Lizards, and Snakes of North America, Ann. Rep. U. S. Nat. Museum for 1898, pp. 24S-53, 1900. 3 Stejneger, Leonhard, Annotated List of Reptiles and Batraehians Collected by Dr. C. HartMerriam and Vernon Bailey on the San Francisco Mountain Plateau and Desert of the Little Colorado, Arizona, with descriptions of New Species, North American Fauna, no. 3, U. S. Dept. Agr., pp. 103-05, pi. xm, 1890. Ruthven, A. G., A Collection of Reptiles and Amphibians from Southern New Mexico and Arizona, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., xxih, pp. 512-14, 1907. 48 BUREAU OF AUKKH'AN ETHNOLOGY [p.rix.SG Reported at Santa Fe, Abiquiu,San Lldefonso, and Plaza del Alcalde by Yarrow and Cope. 1 Uta stansburiatia Baird & Girard. Stansbury's Small-scaled Swift. Reported at San lldefonso by Yarrow and Cope. 2 8 Uta levis Stejneger. Olive Small-scaled Swift. Type locality is Tierra Amarilla. 3 This appears to be Yarrow's record 4 under the name Uta ornata Baird & Girard. Our Indian informants say that snakes swallow these lizards. They are harmless. Sceloporus undulatus consobrinus (Baird & Girard). Yellow- banded Spiny-scaled Swift. Yarrow reported this species from Santa Fe and described Scelo- porus tristichus from Taos, the description being written by Cope apparently. Afterward Yarrow reported tristichus from Taos and consobrinus from both Taos and Santa Fe. Cope later repeated Yar- row's records for both localities, but made both of them subspecies of undulatus. 5 Ditmars 6 ignores tristichus. Small lizards of tins group are very abundant at El Bito de los Frijoles, darting in and out among the rocks and logs everywhere in the canyon. The only specimens we collected are assigned to consobrinus. Eodohiy. Phrynosoma douglassii hernandesi (Girard). Western Horned Lizard. Reported at Taos, Santa Fe, Abiquiu, and San lldefonso by Yarrow and Cope. 7 We collected two specimens of horned lizard at El Rito de los Frijoles, and both are hernandesi. Our Indian informants declared that snakes swallow these lizards, swell up, burst, and the lizard comes out alive. This is not more fantastic than some of the popular notions of white people concerning animals. The name "horned toad," usually applied to this animal, should be dropped even from popular literature, as it belongs distinctly to the Reptilia and not to the Amphibia. Kodohiy. Phrynosoma douglassii ornatissimum (Girard). Ornate Horned Lizard. i Yarrow, H.C, Report, op. cit., p. 569; Check-List, op eit., pp. 5tv-57. Cope, E. D., op. cit., pp. 293-97. 2 Yarrow, II. ('., Report, op. eit., p. 506, Check-List, op. cit., p. 49. Cope, op. cit., p. 310. i Stejneger, op. cit., p. 108. Cope, op. cit., p. 313. < Yarrow, H. C, Check-List, op. cit., p. 56. o Yarrow, II. ('., Report, op. cit., p. 572; Check-List, op. cit., pp. M-fi2. Cope.E.D., op. cit., pp.376 8L e Ditmars, R. L., Reptile Book, New York, 1907. i Yarrow, II. ('., Report, op. cit., p. 581; Check-List, op. cit., pp. 6S-6a. Cope, E. D., op. cit., pp. 413-15. HENDERSOX HARRIXGTO [.] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 49 Reported at Santa Fe by Yarrow and Cope. 1 Kodohiy. Phrynosoma cornutum Harlan. Southern Horned lizard. Reported at San Ildefonso and Abiquiu by Yarrow, 2 and at Taos, Abiquiu, and San Ildefonso by Cope. 3 Kodohiy. Anota modesta Girard. Little Horned Lizard. Recorded at San Ildefonso by Yarrow and Cope. 4 Cnemidophorus tessellatus perplexus (Baird & Girard). Seven- striped Lizard. Recorded at San Ildefonso by Yarrow and Cope. 5 This is Yarrow's C. octolineatus Baird, from the same locality. 6 Possibly the sub- specific name perplexus should be dropped. ? Cnemidophorus sexlineatus (Linn.). Six-lined Lizard. Recorded at Santa Fe, Plaza del Alcalde, and Abiquiu to Jemez, by Yarrow and Cope. 7 This record possibly should be referred to C. gularis Baird & Girard. Kodu'u. Eumeces obsoletus (Baird & Girard) . Sonora Skink. Two fine specimens of this lizard, with the edges of the scales quite dark, were unearthed by the Indians in excavating the old pueblo at El Rito de los Frijoles. One was captured, the other escaped. Old men of San Ildefonso declared that it is poisonous and would not touch it. They have a "remedy" for its bite. They are mistaken as to its poisonous character. The Mexicans call this kind of lizard escurpion. Besides the ~kodoh{y, 'horned lizard/ which the Mexicans call camaleon, the Tewa have names for five other kinds of nativejizards: Qwvpa-je is a lizard which is sometimes as long as the ts%-qwije (see below). It is blue-bellied and gray-backed. fso_-yde_-, a lizard of bluish color, a little longer than the tse'dhqwiy. fse-daqwiy, a species of small, inconspicuous lizard. The descrip- tion reminds one of the swift. The first syllable of the name seems to be tse', 'face.' Ts%-qwije, 'white stripes' (&%', white; qwije, stripe). This lizard has white stripes down its back. i Yarrow, H. C , Check-List, op. cit., p. 69. Cope, E. D., op. cit., p. 417. 2 Yarrow, n. C, Report, op. cit., p. 579; Check-List, op. cit., p. 66. s Cope, E. D., op. cit., p. 436. « Yarrow, H. C, Check-List, op. cit., p. 64. Cope, E. D., op. cit., p. 439. 6 Yarrow, Check-List, op. cit., p. 44. Cope, E. D., op. cit., p. 574. 6 Yarrow, II. C, Report, op. cit., p. 558. 1 Yarrow, H. C, Report, op. cit., p. 558; Check-List, op. cit., p. 43. Cope, E. P., op. cit., p. 597. 50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 Kajimqr) (- Pseny pe'ydi H , 'black snake' (pseny, snake; p\'y, black). A dark- colored snake species. Qw&ypy,', 'tail bell' (qw%'y, tail; py, bell or rattle). This name applies to any kind of rattlesnake, and is given above. Py now usually means bell of any kind; formerly it referred to anything which gave out a note when struck or made a rattling sound. Ex- amine: n%'i H pseny nqqivse'ypy my qwse'ydiwe, 'this snake has a rattle on its tail' (nse', this; pseny, snake; nq, it; qwse'y, tail; py, bell; my, to be, to be provided with; qwse'y, tail; 'iwe, locative); tse'* 'yfsi-glmy, it has ten rattles' (<#'*, ten; 'y, it, with reference to it; fsi'gi, notch, narrow place; my, to be, to be provided with). Of snakes one says either nqmse', 'it goes' (nq,, it: mse: , to go), or 'iqwa'm&y, 'it crawls' ('i, it; qwa'mse'y, to go crawlingly, like a man on all fours). 52 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 TURTLES Only one name for species of turtle or tortoise was obtained from the Tewa — this is 'o'Jcw. The 'o'Jcu' is common in the region. These turtles are found mostly in meadows. They are killed and the carapaces are cleaned and worn by dancers. Amphibians (Batrachians) The amphibians of the region are not very important. Sala- manders are rare, and the lack of water restricts frogs and toads to limited areas. Except the frogs, they are of no food value. None of them is poisonous, though it seems that the whites generally look upon the spotted salamander with fear. Having no specimens we could not determine whether the Indians had the same dread. Ambystoma tigrinum (Green). Tiger Salamander. Reported at Santa Fe Creek, under the name Ambystoma mavortium Baird, by Yarrow, 1 and by Cope 2 under the name tigrinum. Amby- stoma trisruptum Cope was credited to Santa Fe by Yarrow, 3 but Cope 4 says the only known specimen is from Ocate Creek, east of the mountains in northern New Mexico, and hence not in the Rio Grande drain aire. Spelerpes multiplicatus Cope(?). We found a small salamander rather common under aspen logs near Valle Grande, in the Jemez Mountains. Specimens badly injured in transit were doubtfully identified as this species by Dr. Leonhard Stejneger. The Indians to whom it was shown were not familiar with it and had no name for it. Bufo leiUiginosus woodhousei (Girard). Rocky Mountain Toad. Bufo lentiginosus woodhousei was reported at Santa Fe and Plaza del Alcalde in 1874, by Yarrow, 5 who remarked that it was "appa- rently numerous in New Mexico." In his Check-List 6 he gives the Plaza del Alcalde record under the name americanus, does not recog- nize woodhousei as a distinct form, and omits the Santa Fe record. i Yarrow, H. C, Check-List of North American Reptilia and Batrachia, with Catalogue of Specimens in U. S. National Museum, Bull. U, U. S. Nat. Museum, p. 149, 1882. « ('one, E. D., The Batrachia of North America, Bull. Si, U. S. Na!. Museum, \>. 85, 1889. 3 Yarrow, H. C, op. cit., p. 150. * Cope, op. cit., p. 86. 6 Yarrow, H. C, Report upon the Collections of Batrachians and Reptiles Made in Portions of Nevada, Utah, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, During the Years 1871, 1S72, 1873, and 1874, U. S. Oeog. Eiplor. & Surv. W. of 100th Merid., v, p. 521, 1875. » Yarrow, H. C, Check-List, etc., op. cit., p. 166. IIauu.'nkton] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 53 Cope ' recognizes woodhousei and records it from other localities in New Mexico, but not from these two places or from anywhere in our area, and preserves Yarrow's ameri'canus record at Plaza del Alcalde. Miss Dickerson 2 raises americanus to a full species, and says it "is the common toad east of the Rocky Mountains from Mexico to the Great Bear Lake," while she leaves woodhousei as a subspecies of lentiginosus and says it is "the common toad of the Rocky Mountain region," having been reported from a number of States, including New Mexico. Ruth ven 3 says it is the "common toad of the Great Plains and Great Basin region." Our San Ildefonso Indian informants reported "two kinds of frogs" in the region of the Rito de los Frijoles, one of which is found in the water, the other being larger and flatter and is found "jump- ing " about on land. Probably the latter is a toad. As Bufo cognatus Say is reported from Colorado, Kansas, and Arizona, it may extend across New Mexico, or at least be found in the northern portion. 2 . Rana pipiens Schreber. Leopard Frog. Frogs were recorded at Taos, Abiquiu, and Santa Fe under the name Rana halecina berlandieri (Kami) Cope, and at Taos under the name Rana halecina halecina (Kami) Cope, by Yarrow. 4 Cope after- ward transferred these records to Rana virescens hrachycephala Cope. 5 Miss Dickerson 6 says virescens is Schreber 's pipiens, which she is unable to separate into subspecies. Further study of this variable frog, based on large quantities of fresh material from widely sepa- rated and numerous localities, is desirable. We saw several frogs at El Rito de los Frijoles, but unfortunately obtained none. (See note on Rocky Mountain toad, page 52.) SALAMANDERS, FROGS, TOADS The Tewa appear to have but one name for all species of sala- manders, and but one name for all species of frogs and toads. Po'qwse,' means salamander. The first syllable is clearly the word meaning 'water.' P'e_ m ykwqn is applied to frogs and toads. Tadpoles are called p'fykufcede in the San Juan dialect, and either po'safcede or p'e-ypw- kede in the San Ildefonso dialect. The etymology of these words is not clear. It was thought by one informant that the tadpole's tail drops off. i Cope, E. D., op. cit., pp. 281-88. 2 Dickerson, Mary C, The Frog Book, pp. 63, 91-92, New York, 1906. s Ruthven, A. G., A Collection of Reptiles and Amphibians from Southern New Mexico and Arizona, Bull.Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist, XXm, p. 509, 1907, « Yarrow, H. C, Cheek-List. op. cit.. p. 181, s Cope, E. D., op. cit., pp. 403-0-1. e Dickerson, Mary C, op. cit., p. 171, 54 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 Fishes "Most of the lateral canyons of the region are dry or nearly dry through most of the year, and hence contain no fishes. The Rio Grande is known to contain fishes in some portions of its course. The Rito de los Frijoles is at present a small stream, the waters of which in places sink entirely beneath the surface of the sand, leaving not even pools, and the water all along becomes very shallow at times. Limited observations make final conclusions unsafe, but so far as they go they seem to indicate that the water flowing in the creek is dependent largely on precipitation hi the mountains at the head of the canyon. When frequent rains were occurring in the lower part of the valley the stream reached its lowest point, but during an exceedingly dry period at our camp, when it was raining daily in the mountains the stream kept an even flow. The absence of deep pools in which fish could survive an extended drouth seems sufficient to account for their absence. In the glaciated mountains farther north, the absence of fish is usually noted in streams whose courses present cataracts too high for the fishes to pass over in their upstream progression after the retreat of the glaciers. Two vertical falls near the mouth of this canyon, one of 60 feet, the other of 90 feet, would effectually block the attempts of fish to pass upstream from the Rio Grande. Hence any fish which may have existed in recent times must have been there before the falls were formed or have been introduced in some unusual way. The transportation of eggs attached to the feet of birds for the short distance over the falls would not be at all impossible, though such a method of dispersion is not so likely to occur as in case of fresh-water mollusks, etc. It is also possible that fish may at one time have been placed in this creek by former inhabitants, either the ancient dwellers who built the abandoned structures or by the Mexican outlaws who made the canyon their rendezvous for a century or so. At any rate, trout were found in the stream from 20 to 30 years ago, according to information gleaned from several sources. Bandelier, in The Delight Makers, causes one of the native boys who lived in the canyon during its early occupancy, to catch a trout. This would scarcely be con- clusive if it were not that in his formal report he refers to the stream as a "gushing brook, enlivened by trout." 1 Dr. Charles F. Lummis, of Los Angeles, says he caught trout from the stream in 1891, and that there were certainly many pools then which do not exist now. Judge Abbott says he has heard the same from another visitor to the canyon a quarter of a century ago. « Bandelier, A. F., The Delight Makers, New York, 1890, p._ 5. Final Report of Investigations Among the Indians of the Southwestern United States, Carried on Mainly in the Years from 1880 to 1885, Part II, Papers of the Archxologkal Institute of America, American Series, iv, p. 139, 1892. Henderson T ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 55 HARRINGTONj j_, j. -lj. -li w w The present absence of trout has been locally attributed to a heavy flood which is said to have washed them away. There is evidence along the bottom-lands that such a flood did occur, but that it washed the trout out is highly improbable. It seems much more probable that it may have filled the pools that once made it possible for trout to survive protracted dry seasons, though it is not impossible that the filling is due to the fact that the desiccation of the country has at last reached a point where the stream is not able to take care of the debris arising from lateral erosion of the valley. It is not at all improbable that the creek may have completely dried up during some particularly dry cycle within the last 20 years. In any event we must believe that there were trout a quarter of a century ago, and so we have no reason to doubt that they existed during the occupancy of the valley by the ancient inhabitants, though that is not a necessary conclusion. Of course we have no definite evidence as to the species, but it was almost certainly the Rio Grande Basin trout (Salmo mykiss spilurus Cope). Cope * says he saw Gila pandora Cope ( = Richardsonius pulchellus pandora Cope — Cockerell) in the creek below Ojo Caliente. Cope and Yarrow 2 reported the following species from nearby Rio Grande drainage localities, to which species we have applied probable modern nomenclature, placing in parentheses the names under which they were reported: Pantosteus plebeius Baird & Girard (P. jarrovii Cope). Sucker. Taos, San Ildefonso, and Tierra Amarilla. Hybognathus nuchalis Agassiz. Silvery Minnow. San Ildefonso. Richardsonius pulchellus pandora (Cope) (Gila pandora) . North- ern Rio Grande Dace. Near San Ildefonso. Notropis simus Cope (Alburnellus simus). Rio Grande Shiner. San Ildefonso. Notropis dilectus Girard (Alburnellus jemezanus Cope). San Ildefonso. Notropis lutrensis Baird and Girard (Hi/psilepis iris Cope). San Ildefonso. 1 Cope, E. D., Report upon the Extinct Vertebrata Obtained in New Mexico by Parties of the Expe- dition of 1874, Geog. Surv. W. of 100th Mend. (Wheeler Survey), iv, pt. n, p. 21. See also ^1 7m. Rcpi.for 1875, p. 66, 1875. 2 Cope, E. D., and Yarrow, H. C, Report upon the Collections of Fishes Made in Portions of Nevada, Utah, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, During the Years 1871, 1872, 1873, and 1S74, Geog. Surv. W. of 100th Merid. (Wheeler Survey), v, pp. 635-703, 1875. See also Cockerell, T. D. A., The Nomen- clature of the American Fishes Usually Called Leueiscus and Rutilus, Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., xxn, pp. 215-17, 1909; The Fishes of the Rocky Mountain Region, Univ. Colo. Studies, v, pp. 159-178, 1908; Jordan, David Starr, and E vermann, Barton Warren, The Fishes of North and Middle America, Bull. 47, U. S. Nat. Mux., 4 vols., 1896-1900. 69231°— Bull. 56—14 5 56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 Rhinichthys cataractse dulcis Girard (R. maxillosus Cope). Sweet- water Daee. Tierra Amarilla, Abiquiu, San Ildefonso, and Taos. Hybopsis aestivalis (Girard) (Oeratichthys sterlelus Cope) . Horny- head. San Ildefonso. Anguilla rostrata (Le Sueur) (A. tyrannus Girard). Fresh-water Eel. Near Santa Fe. They also report Salmo pleuriticus Cope from Rio Taos, Chama River, and near San Ildefonso, but as this species seems to be con- fined to the Colorado River basin the record is probably a mistake. There are perhaps other fishes existing in the Rio Grande drainage of northern New Mexico, but we have found no record of them. The species are mostly small and of little food value. There are rumors of catfish, but no definite record. The Tewa have the following names for species of fish : Piypa", 'mountain fish' (pi'y, mountain; pa', fish). This name seems to be applied to any species of trout. Pa'tsi'jo', 'knife fish' (pa', fish; tsi'jo', knife). This fish lives in the Rio Grande. It has a knife-like back, and there is also a knife- like projection at each side of its lower jaw. It reaches a length exceeding a foot. Pa'wa'p*a', 'flat-chested fish' (pa', fish; wa', chest, breast; p'a-, flat and roundish). This fish lives in the Rio Grande and attains a length of 2 feet or more. Its underside is flat. Tsewlge. This fish lives in the Rio Grande. White men in talking to our informants had called this fish a "sucker." Pa'ty,yw%', 'tall fish' (pa', fish; ty,yw&, tall). This fish lives in the Rio Grande. The Mexicans call it boquinete. Pa-'e', 'little fish' (pa', fish; V, diminutive). This term is applied to any small fish, especially to minnows and the like; also to the young of larger varieties of fish, which often can not be recognized as they can when more mature. Pa-'oavri', 'phlegm fish' (pa', fish; 'oqwi', mucus from the trachea, bronchial tubes, or lungs, such as is coughed up) . This name is applied to any species of eel. The skin of the pa'' oqwi' is highly prized and is used among other purposes for leggings and moccasins. The fish lives in the Rio Grande. It is said that the kinds of fish which live in the Rio Grande would probably also be found in the Rio Chama. Insects Notwithstanding their average small size, when compared with vertebrates, insects are very important from the point of view of natural history. Their interesting habits, their economic relations HENDERSON HAKRIXGTO r x ] ETHN0Z00L0UY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 57 to other animals, and the exceedingly large number of known species give them zoological prominence. Their relations to the pollenization of plants and their destructiveness to vegetation give them both botanical and economic importance. Their relation to the spread of disease and the annoying habits of some of them have a direct bearing on the comfort and happiness of the human race. From the ethnological point of view the position of insects is a minor one. They have little importance as food, except the grass- hoppers, etc., during seasons of abundance. Among native peoples of the lower Colorado Valley insects have acquired considerable relig- ious and mythical significance, especially the ants, but this does not require a knowledge of many species or a very minute discrimination between species. Among the Pueblos they have no such significance. A great number of insect species have been recorded from the Jemez Plateau and Santa Fe. There are doubtless hundreds of others unre- corded, including many now undescribcd and unknown to science. As most of the smaller species are distinguished from one another by characters which may be studied only with a good lens or a micro- scope, it is obvious that in most cases the Indians can not distin- guish the species or even the genera. However, the larger and more conspicuously marked species are likely given definite native names. It would be an interesting contribution to the psychology of the Indians for someone with sufficient entomological training to investi- gate their knowledge of and ideas concerning the insects and the extent and accuracy of then discrimination, including the habits of insects and their relations to plants. Time did not permit us to enter into this field except in an incidental way in connection with the ethnobotanical work. Our collections of insects were accidentally almost wholly destroyed in transit, with- out having been determined or recorded, so that we can not even give an account of the species found. We found many species of beetles, ants, bees, wasps, butterflies, moths, flies, and other insects. It does not seem important in this report to list the species of insects recorded from the region by Ashmead, Banks, Cockerell, Coquillett, Dunning, Fall, Fox, Gillette, Hagen, Holland, Howard, Hulst, Mead, Seudder, Thomas, Townsend, Uhler, Ulke, and Wheeler. More than 30 of Prof. Cockerell's papers report species from this region. Ulke has recorded 56 species of Coleoptera (beetles), and Uhler has recorded 34 species of Hemiptera (plant-lice, scale insects, true bugs, etc.) from San Ildefonso, Taos, Santa Fe, Abiquiu, and Tierra Amarilla. Hagen recorded three species of Neuroptera from San Ildefonso, Tierra Amarilla, and Taos. Most of the other records are from Santa Fe. Work along this line could be easily done by persons with very limited knowledge of entomology. They could collect the insects 58 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 and preserve them, number the labels, obtain the ethnological data, preserving the connections by referring to the label numbers, and tjie specimens could then be determined accurately by specialists. That many of the western Indians did not formerly disdain insects as a part of their diet is well known. Hoffman's comments 1 are of interest in this connection: Some of the tribes will adhere to the most disgusting varieties of food. . . . Some of the Shoshonees obtain some food from the settlements, but subsist chiefly upon what game and fish they can secure in addition to lizards, grasshoppers, etc. . . . Their mode of preparing grasshoppers is in this wise: A fire is built covering an area of from 20 to 30 feet square, and as the material is consumed to coals and ashes all the Indians start out and form an extensive circle, driving the grasshoppers with blankets or bunches of brush toward the center, where they are scorched or disabled, when they are collected, dried, and ground into meal. With the addition of a small quan- tity of water this is worked and kneaded into dough, formed into small cakes, and baked in the sand under a fire. . . . The Pah-Utes in the southwestern portion of Nevada, and even across the line into California, consume the larvae of flies found upon the borders of some '"alkali lakes." The organic matter washed ashore is soon covered with flies, where they deposit their eggs; there being not sufficient nourish- ment for all the worms, some die, when more eggs are deposited, and so on ad infinitum, until there is a belt of swarming, writhing worms from 2 to 4 feet broad and from an inch to 3 inches in depth. ... At such localities the Indians congregate, scoop up and pack all that can be transported for present and future use. When thoroughly dried, it is ground into meal, and prepared and eaten as by the Shoshonees. Where conditions of life are as hard as in many parts of the South- west, it would be surprising indeed if, during times of special scarcity of food, all the Indians inhabiting the region have not been forced to rely on food which ordinarily they did not use; yet from the fact that Indians of various tribes have frequently been known to show a preference for raw entrails of large game animals and seem really fond of meat that has become somewhat tainted, one can not always feel certain that the use as food of things which are revolting to other people may not be due to choice. The following Tewa names of kinds of insects were obtained: Kun% refers to any kind of ant. Color- or size-denoting adjec- tives are often added. An anthill is called kunsete-bidl (kufieti, ant; te', house; bi'dl, mound of small size; cf. bo\ie, large mound). The Jemez however, have two names for ant species: 'amy, and iva'&ym. Hodge gives as Ant clans at various pueblos : Nambe, Ku^yl-tdoa; Pecos, Amu'+; Acoma, Sii-hanoq ch ; Sia, Sii-hdno; San Felipe, Sii-hdno. PseVada, bumblebee. These insects make honey. They are ground up and put into a dog's food in order to make him a good hunter, according to a San Ildefonso informant. i Hodman, W. J., Miscellaneous Ethnographic Observations on Indians Inhabiting Nevada. California, and Arizona, Tenth Ann. Hep. U. S. Oeol. and Geog. Surv. Terr, for 1876 (Hayden Survey), pp. 165 66, 1878. ?ngton] ETHNOZOOLOGV OF THE TEWA INDIANS 59 HENDERSON' HAKR For species of wasp, bee, and hornet only two names could be obtained. Qwo-uebe' seems to be the honey-bee, while t* awe is some kind of wasp. Honey is called qivo-debe-'qpo- , 'bee sweet water' (qwo'uebe', bee; 'q, sweet, sweetness; po- , water). Cushing tells how honey was obtained by Zuni girls from a kind of burrowing hornet. 1 In the Zuni country there is a kind of burrowing hornet (or carpenter bee) which drills into adobe or mud walls and there deposits its honey. On any fine day in late summer one may see little groups of girls hunting the holes of these hornets along the garden walls. Whenever they find a number of them they provide themselves with gourds of water which they dash against the adobe or spurt into the holes through straws. The hornets, disabled by drenching, soon crawl forth and are easily killed or driven away, after which the girls, with little wooden or bone picks, dig out the honey. Various species of butterfly are called at San Juan poganini, at San Ildefonso polamimi. The latter word is peculiar in that, so far as we know, it is the only native Tewa word which contains the sound of I. No word meaning "moth" could be obtained. The Isleta call butterfly paifireue. The introduced house-fly and many insects of similar appearance are called p*y,ny,. A bluish fly species was distinguished as py,nu tsq-tjwse-'i H , 'blue fly' (p'yny,, fly; tsq-yw&, blue, green). Other Tanoan languages show cognate forms: Taos, p'unuend; Isleta, p'unuude; Piro (Bartlett's vocabulary), u a-fu-ya-e, fly"; Jemez, Fwijd. Species of firefly are called tsik'owa and p"a'p"y,ny,, 'fire fly' (p'a', fire; p*y,ny,, fly). Dragon-flies are called pO'4y,y4y,y (po', water; uy,y, to buzz like a bullroarer). Cushing tells a Zuni myth of the origin of the dragon- fly. 2 1 fWV, 'cricket,' 'locust.' This is the animal which the Mexicans call chichara. Po'tsue, 'water bird' (po', water; tsiie, bird), is not a bird, but an insect. It resembles po'dy/gdy/Q in its habit of hovering over water. K'qw\hj is a species of grasshopper or locust. Another species is distinguished as Tc ' qw\hj 'q'wVi 1 , 'brown grasshopper' (k'qwi'iij, grasshopper or locust species; 'a', brown). Black-headed head lice are called p K e\ Body lice are known as fuwa, while bedbugs, which are still more numerous, are called fi'i. All three terms might be carelessly applied to "lice" on plants, wood, or garbage. Notice that a small species of land snail is called p'u'p'e', 'rabbit-brush louse' (p'u', rabbit-brush; pV ; head louse); see page 65. 1 dishing, F. H., Zuni Breadstuff, The Millstone, x, no. 3, March, 1885, p. 42, note. 2 Ibid., pp. 35-38. 60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [boll. 56 Mosquitoes are known as fugfl or fuyo'e- (fugo, mosquito; V, diminutive). Cf. Taos qwitolaand; Isleta tanJcinaue; Piro (Bartlett's vocabulary) " quen-lo-a-tu-ya-e" ; Jemez PdhdFwijd. The inch-long ill-smelling black beetle of the Tewa country is called j>'irse\ spider; p l e', trap, snare). Tarantulas also are called 'q'w%', but the proper name is lee'lwpuj^, 'bear back deerskin' (ke', bear, any species j tw, back, spinal column; puje, dressed skin of deer, elk, etc.). They are quite common. Their holes are called pV, 'hole.' An old Indian who is usually very correct in his identifications called a green dip- terous insect taken from a Populus angustifolia tree 'q'wse' tsq"t)wse, r i H , 'blue or green spider' ('4'w%', spider; tsq"QW%', blue, green). HE.N'DEK HARRI ngton] ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 61 MOLLUSKS 1 The native Mollusca do not enter to any extent into the culture of the Indians of this region at the present time, and probably the same is true with reference to the former inhabitants. It is not unusual to find marine shells in the ruins, especially Olivella. They were probably obtained by barter with the peoples living to the south- westward. At El Rito de los Frijoles a few specimens of Olivella biplicata Sowerby and one of Erato vitellina Hinds were found. They doubtless were brought from southern California or from Lower Cali- fornia. None of the native land or fresh-water shells of the region have been found in the ruins, which is not surprising. Ashmunella , Oreohelix, Physa, and Lym-nsea are the only species large enough to be particularly noticed, and they do not exceed three-fourths of an inch in greatest diameter. This, it is true, is as large as the marine shells commonly found in the ruins, but the land shells do not appear to have become articles of barter, perhaps because they occur through- out the region and are therefore obtainable nearly everywhere and further because they are rather fragile. The shells of mollusks have been used as a medium of exchange and as ornaments, amulets, and ceremonial objects by primitive peoples everywhere. They have been used very extensively by the Indian tribes of the Pacific and Atlantic coastal regions in North America and by them introduced into the interior. 2 Strings of beads made from the common Olivella biplicata of the Pacific coast, worn about the neck as ornaments and used in barter, found their way into Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and southwestern Colorado, and Stearns 3 tells us that in New Mexico Dr. Edward Palmer was "witness to a trade wherein the consideration for a horse was a California abalone shell." Bracelets of Glycimeris from the Gulf of California have found their way as far north and east at least as northeastern Arizona, where they are reported, together with Turritella tigrina, Conus, and Olivella, by Hough, who says 4 they are found mostly in the pueblo ruins situated in mountain passes, probably along routes of primitive travel. 1 Henderson, Junius, Mollusca from Northern New Mexico, The Nautilus, xxvi, pp. 80-81, 1912. 2 Holmes, William II., Art in Shell of the Ancient Americans, Second Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn.Jor 1880-81 ,pp. 179-305, 1883; Report on the Ancient Ruins of Southwestern Colorado, Examined During the Summers of 1875 and 1876, Tenth Ann. Rep. U. S. Geol. and Geog. Sur. Terr, for 1876 (Hayden Survey), p. 407,1878. Stearns, Robert E. C, Ethno-Conchology— A Study of Primitive Money, Ann. Rep. U. 8. Nat. Museum for 1887, pp. 297-334, 1889. Powers, Stephen, Tribes of California, Oontr. X. Amer. Ethn., m,pp. 335-38, 1877. 3 Stearns, R. E. C, op. cit., p. 329. 4 Hough, Walter, Archaeological Field Work in Northeastern Arizona: The Museum-Gates Expedition of 1901, Ann. Rep. U. S. Nat. Museum for 1901, p. 295, 1903 (see also pp. 300, 305, 338, 344). 62 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 Fewkes 1 mentions West Coast marine shell ornaments in Arizona, made from Pectunculus [Glydmeris] sp., Conus fergusoni, C. princeps, C. regvlaris, Turritella sp., Haliotis sp., Strombus sp., Cardium sp., Melongena patula, Oliva angulata, and Oliva [Olivella] biplicata or hiatula, many of the species having also found their way into New Mexico. He says (p. 88): It is well known that there was a considerable trade in early times in these shells, and long trips were taken by the Pueblo Indians for trade purposes. The intercourse of northern and southern peoples of Arizona through trading expe- ditions continued to quite recent times, but judging from the number of specimens which were found in the ruins it must have been considerably greater in prehistoric times than it is at present. In fact, much of the decline in this traffic is probably to be traced to the modification of the southern Arizonian aborigines and the intro- duction of new ornaments by the whites. From the ruins near Winslow, Arizona, the following species of Pacific coast marine shells have been reported by Fewkes: 2 Pectuncu- lus giganteus Reeve, Melongena patula Rod. & Sow., Stromhus gahatus Wood, Conus fergusoni Sow., Cardium elatum Sow., Oliva angulata Lam., Oliva Jiiatula Gmelin, Oliva biplicata Sew., Turritella tigrina Keiner. Our San Ildefonso Indian informants had a distinct name for Aslimunella, which is common along El Rito de los Frijoles, in the Jemez Mountains, and probably in favorable localities throughout the region. They did not know Oreohelix, three specimens of which were obtained in the Jemez Mountains. Pupilla, although only 3 millimeters in height and 1.5 millimeter in width, received a special name, being distinguished from the more flatly spired shells by its high spire and cylindrical form. The natter shells of small size (YaUonia, Zonitoides, etc.) were grouped under another name, with- out distinguishing species. One of the Indian boys, who had never noticed the snails before, was shown several species under some logs. He began a search and soon found a Cochlicopa, which differs markedly from the species that had been shown to him, and he at once recog- nized it as another kind of snail, but our informants had no distinrt name for it. The mollusks of the region have no apparent economic value. Conditions are not favorable in the Rio Grande Valley of northern New Mexico for the larger clams, which would have a food value, and none have been found. There appear to be no published records of bivalve mollusks (JPekeypoda) Tor the region. Calyculina and Pisidium have been found in the Rio Grande drainage in Colorado, and the latter, if not the former, probably occurs in our area in New Mexico, wherever ' Fewkes, J.W., Two Summers' Work in Pueblo Ruins, Twenty-second Ann. Rep. Bvr. Anur. Ellin., part I, pp. 88-93, 187, 1904. I FewkSS, I.W., Preliminary Account of an Expedition to the Pueblo Kuins Near Winslow, Arizona, in l.vjti, Smithsonian Rep. for 1896, pp. 529, 530, 535, 530, 1898. Hu^fxr S To N vl ETHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 63 HAKKINGTONj there are perennial streams. Prof. T. D. A. Cockerell has a manu- script list of New Mexico shells prepared by Rev. E. H. Ashmun, in which Pisidium is listed from Santa Fe. In El Rito de los Frijoles no aquatic shells were found, either bivalve or univalve. Indeed, the scarcity of aquatic animal life, except water beetles and "water boatmen," may indicate that the water does not always flow in that rivulet in very dry seasons. The only record of an aquatic mollusk of any kind yet published is Physa, though Lymnsea palustris Muller from Taos, and L. desidiosa Say (probably L. obrussa Say) and Planorbis parvus Say, both from Santa Fe, are included in Ashmun's list, Land snails are usually to be found along the bottom lands, in the canyons, and throughout the mountains, under cottonwood and aspen logs, not often among conifers. As the species are mostly tiny, some of them smaller than an ordinary pin head, and most of them much less than a quarter of an inch in diameter, it requires close inspection to discover them. They may be packed with a little moss or some green leaves and shipped alive to conchologists for identifi- cation. Ashmunella thomsoniana Ancey. This species is recorded from Santa Fe Canyon and the Pecos Valley by Pilsbry, 1 the localities being all east of the Rio Grande. Two subspecies are credited to the Pecos drainage in New Mexico. Other species are recorded from south of our area. P'e'oie'e-, 'little wood shell' (p'e, stick, wood; 'ofte, shell; V, diminutive). Ashmunella ashmuni Dall. The type locality of this species is Bland, not far from El Rito de los Frijoles. 2 The species is very abundant at several localities along the Rito de los Frijoles. Five immature specimens from near the top of the Jemez Mountains at Valle Grande, and four from about half- way to the base of the mountains, may be referable to this form, though probably belonging to the next. It is likely that the San Ilde- fonso Indian name given to this form would be applied to the other AshmuneHa species, as they are so much alike that they would be sep- arated only by a skilled conchologist looking for slight differences. ? Ashmunella ashmuni robusta Pilsbry. This subspecies is somewhat larger than the preceding, and was described as from the "Jemez Mountains near Bland, N. Mex., at higher elevations than A. ashmuni.' '' 3 1 Pilsbry, Henry A., Mollusca of the Southwestern States, I: Crocoptid.e; Helicida? of Arizona ami New Mexico, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., lvii, p. 235, 1905. 2 Dall, William H., Report on the Mollusks Collected by the International Boundary Commission of the United States and Mexico, Prnc. U. S.Nat. Museum, xix, p. 342, 1897. Pilsbry, Henry A., op. cit., p. 233. 5 Pilsbry, Henry A., op. cit., p. 233. 64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 5t> Ashmunella townsendi Bartsch. Described from Ruidoso, Lincoln County, New Mexico. 1 ? Oreohdix strigosa depressa Ckll. Three weathered specimens which appear to belong to some form of 0. strigosa Gould were found in the Jemez Mountains near Valle Grande. Our Indian informants were not familiar with them and had no name for them, but did not confuse them with Ashmunella. Ashmun's list, hereinbefore mentioned, includes Oreohelix concen- trata Dall, from near Bland, at an altitude of 10,000 feet. % Pwpilla muscorum Linne. We found a single specimen at El Rito de los Frijoles. Pwpilla blandi Morse. Abundant at El Rito de los Frijoles and in the Jemez Mountains near Valle Grande. Bifidaria. pellucida parvidens Sterki. We found one in a canyon half-way to the top of Jemez Mountains, near Valle Grande. Vertigo coloradensis basidens Pilsbry & Vanatta. The type locality is Bland, New Mexico. 2 ? Vertigo concinnula Cockerell. We found two specimens of this species in the Jemez Mountains, near VtiUe Grande. It was recorded from these mountains by Pilsbry and Vanatta also. 3 ? OocMicopa lubrica Miillcr. Common at El Rito de Ins Frijoles. Vallonia cyclophorella Ancey. Common in the Jemez Mountains, near Valle Grande, and abundant in the canyon at El Rito de los Frijoles. 1 Bartsch in Smithson. Afisc. Coll., xlvii, pp. 13-14, 1904. i Pilsbry, Henry A., and Vanalta, Edward Q., A Partial Revision of the Pupa; of the United States, Ptoc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philn. for 1900. p. 604. 1 Pilsbry, Henry A., and Vanatta, Edward G., op. cit., pp. 599-000. Henderson 1 tcTHNOZOOLOGY OF THE TEWA INDIANS 65 hakiuxgtonJ Vitrina aUiskana Dall. We found three small dead specimens in the Jemez Mountains, near Valle Grande, and four at El Rito de los Frijoles. Euconulus trocUformis alaskensis Pilsbry. Common at El Rito de los Frijoles, and one specimen found in the Jemez Mountains near Valle Grande. Zonitoides arbor eus Say. Common in the Jemez Mountains, near Valle Grande, and abundant at El Rito de los Frijoles. Pyramidula shimeki cocker elli Pilsbry. At El Rito de los Frijoles only two specimens were found at the ancient pueblo, while about two miles up the canyon from the pueblo the species was abundantly represented. 1 Succinea avara Say. Only one specimen found at El Rito de los Frijoles. We dare suspect that Yarrow's record of S. streichiana Bland at Tierra Amarilla * may refer to this species. Physa sp. Yarrow 2 recorded P. ancillaria Say from San Ildefonso, P. traski% Lea from Santa Fe, ?P. D'Orbigniana Lea and P. warreniana Lea from Abiquiu, and P. altonensis from Pescado. It is likely that these identifications are partly or wholly wrong, but evidently one or more species of Physa occur in the region. Yarrow's record of Pyramidula perspectiva Say at San Ildefonso 3 is probably something else, possibly P. cronkhitei anthonyi. Fu-pe-, 'rabbit-brush louse' (pV , rabbit-brush; p'e', head louse). Pupilla sp. The species were consistently called thus whether found on rabbit- brush bushes or elsewhere. (See p. 59.) We have attempted to record all the Tewa names for species of Mollusca or then shells, and with this intent we have spent consider- able time examining collections of shells with a number of Indians. i Yarrow H C Report upon the Collections of Terrestrial and Fluviatile Mollusca Made in Portions of Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona During the Years 1872, 1873, and 1874, U. S. Geog. Explor.& Surv. W. of 100th Merid. (Wheeler Survey), v, p. 936, 1875. 2 Ibid., pp. 939, 940, 941. 3 Ibid., p. 932. 66 BUKEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [bull. 56 The Tewa were familar with mollusks living in their own country, and also with shells of mollusks obtained from other tribes and used for ceremonial or other purposes. The general name for fresh-water snails is 'obe, a word applied also to some kinds of marine mollusks and their shells. (See below.) Slugs are called pubse', a name which is applied to any wormlike animal. (See under the discussion of insects, page 60.) Only the shells of marine mollusks are known, although our inform- ants had quite a correct idea of what the living animals are like. The following terms referring to shells were recorded: 'obe pv'i H , 'red shell' ('obe, shell; pi', red); 'obe t%giydi H , 'flat shell' ('obe, shell; tig_iy, flat and roundish); 'obemapi'i' 1 , 'spiral shell' ('obe, shell; mapi, spiral, twisted); 'obe lca''i H , 'thick shell' ('obe, shell; lea,-, thick); 'obe lco''i H , 'rough shell' ('obe, shell; &. .;. U. S. E.vplor. & Surv. for B. B.from Miss, to Pac. Ocean (Whipple Survey >, x, 1859. Langkavel, B. Dogs and savages. Smithsonian Bep. for 1898, pp. 651-675, 1899. (Transl. from Intern. Archiv fur Ethnog., Bd. vin, pp. 109-149.) Lucas, F. A. A dog of the ancient Pueblos. Science, n. s., v, p. 544, 1897. Lyon, M. W. Jr. Mammal remains from two prehistoric village sites in New Mex- ico and Arizona. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., xxxi,'pp. 647-649, 1906. McCall, George A. Some remarks on the habits, etc., of birds met with in western Texas, between San Antonio and the Rio Grande, and in New Mexico. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila.for 1851, v, pp. 213-224, 1852. Notes on Carpodacus frontalis, (Say) with description of a new species of the same genus from Santa Fe, New Mexico. Ibid., vi, p. 61, 1854. McGee, W J. The Siouan Indians. Fifteenth Bep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 153-204. 1897. Mearns, Edgar A. Mammals of the Mexican boundary of the United States. Bull. 56, U. S. Nat. Museum, pt. 1, 1907. Ornithological \ocabulary of the Moki Indians. Amer. Anthr., ix. pp. 391-403. 1896. Merriam, C Hart. Descriptions of twenty-three new pocket gophers of the genus Thomomys. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., xiV, pp. 107-117, 1901. Miller, Gerrit S. Revision of the North American bats of the family Vespertilioni- da?. North American Fauna, no. 13, Biol. Surv., U. S., Dept. Agr., 1897. A new jumping mouse from New Mexico. Proc. Biol. Soc. Weish.. xxiv. pp. 253-254, 1911. Mitchell, Walton I. The summer birds of San Miguel county, New Mexico. The Auk, xv, pp. 306-311, 1898. Mooney, James. Myths of the Cherokee. Nineteenth Bep. Bur. Amer. Film., pp. 3-548, 1900. Morrison. Charles C. Executive and descriptive report of Lieutenant Charles C. Morrison, Sixth Cavalry, on the operations of party no. 2, Colorado section, field season of 1877. Ann. Bep. U. S. Gcog. Ex pi. and Surv. W. 100th Merid.,for 1878, pp. 131-139, 1878. 69231°— Bull. 56—14 6 72 BUBEAU OF AM !'.!;!« AX ETHNOLOGY [bill. 50 N a daillac, Marquis de. Pre-historic Anoerica. New York, L884. Nelson, B. W. The rabbits of North America. North American Fauna, no. 29, Biol. Surv., U. S. Dept. Agr., L909. See Henshaw, II. W., and Nelson. Osgood, Wilfred II . Revision of the pocket mice of the genus Perognathus. [bid., no. is. L900. Revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. [bid., no.28, L909. Pilsbry, Henry A. Molluscaof the Southwestern states. I: Urocoptidge; Helicidae of Arizona and New Mexico. I'roc. Acad. Nat. Sci. I'lrihi., lvii, pp. 211-290, 1905; lxi, pp. 495-516, 1909; Lxn, pp. 44-147, 1910. and Ferriss, J. II. Mollusca of the Southwestern stales. II. [bid., lyiii, pp. L23-175, L906. and Vanatta, Edward G. A partCi revision of the Pupa: of the United sun,-, [bid., L900,pp. 582-611, 1901. Preble, Edward A. Revision of the jumping mice of the genus Zapus. North American Fauna, no. 15, Biol. Sun.. U. S. Dept. Agr., 1899. Russell, Frank. The Pima Indians. Twenty-sixth Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 3r-389, 1908. Ruthven, Alexander G. A collection of reptiles and amphibians from southern New Mexico and Arizona. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. /list., xxm, pp. 483-603, 1907. Variations and genetic relationships of the garter-snakes. Bull. 61, U. S. Nat. Museum, 1908. Springer, Frank. The field session of the School of American Archaeology. Science, ii s., xxxn, 623, 1910. Stearns, Robert E. C. Ethno-conchology: a study of primitive money. Ann. Rep. U. S. Nat. Museum for 1887, pp. 297-334, 1889. Stejneger, Leonhard. The poisonous snakes of North America. Ibid., 1S9IS, pp. 345-487, L895. — Annotated list of reptiles and batraohians collected by Dr. 0. Hart Merriam and Vernon Bailey on the San Francisco mountain plateau and desert of the Little Colorado, Arizona, with descriptions of new species. North American Fauna, no. S, Biol. Surv., U. S. Dept. Agr., pp. 103-118, 1890. Stevenson, Matilda Coxe. The Zuni Indians., Twenty-third Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 1-008, 1904. Vanatta, Edward G. Sc< Pilsbry, II. A., and Vanatta. Vebrill, A. E. Report upon the collections of fresh water leeches made in portions of Nevada, Utah. Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona during the years 1872, 1873, and 1874. U. S. Gcog. Explor. & Surv. W. of 100th Merid. (Wheeler Survey), v. pp. 955 9(17. 1875. YoTir. II. R. Hopi proper names. Pub. Field Columb. Mus., Anthr. ser.,yi, pp. 63 ll::. L905. Warren, Howard Royal. The mammals of Colorado. New York, 1910 VVinshb?, George Parker. The Coronado expedition, L540-1542. Fourteenth Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethn., pp. 329-613, 1896. Yarrow, II. C. Report upon the collections of batrachians and reptiles made in portions of Nevada, Utah, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, during the years 1871, L872, is::;, and L874. U. S. Geog. Explor. & Surv. II'. of 100th Merid. (Wheeler Survey), v, pp. 509 633, L875. Report, upon the collections of terrestrial and fluviatile mollusca made in portions of Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona during the years [872, is::;. and 1871. Ibid., pp. 923-954. Check-lisl of North American reptilia and batraehia, with catalogue of speci- mens in U. S. National Museum. Bull. 24, U. S. Nat. Museum, 1882. IXDEX OF ZOOLOGICAL NAMES Page Aeronautes melanoleucus ( Baird) 39 Agelaius pka nict usfortis R idgway 41 in Html is Ridgway 41 .1 Ibui in II ii x ji mi :a mix Cope 55 simus 55 A LLIGATOR 50 J mbystoma mavortium Baird 52 tigrinum (Green) 52 trisruptu m Cope 52 Amphibians 52 A ngtt ilia fostrata (Le Sueur) 56 iji i tm mix Girard 56 A nota modesta Girard.. - 49 Anser albifrons gambdi Bartlaub 33 Ant 58 Antelope 2, 3, 15 Antilocapra americana t Ord.) 15 A phelocoma woodhousei ( Baird) 39 .1 quila chrysaetos (Linn.) 37 Arachnids 60 Archilochus alexandri (Bourc. & Mul.) 39 Ashmundla 6,61 ,62,04 ashmuni 63, 64 ashmuni Hall 63 robusta Pilsbry 63 thomsoniana Aneey 63 townsendi Bartsch 64 I si,, ii,! ii, mi ii x (Pont. I 37 wilsonianus t Lesson 1 37 Istragalinus psaltria psaltria (Say) 42 Asyndesmus leioisi Riley Acchenia 6 Badger 5,8,24 Bseolophus inornatus grist us ( Kidgway) 44 Bat 9,10, 12 Batrachians ."i2 Bear 1, 2,4,5,8, 11, 24 Beaver L'l Bedbugs 59 Beetle 60 Bernicla f>r, nta Stepn 33 Bifidaria pcllucida parvidt ns sierki 64 •• Big Chipmunk " 21,22 Bighorn-. See Mountain .sheep. Birds 2,4,1.. id,:,, Bison 3, 4, 13 Bison bison (Linn.) Black BIRD 5,41, 46 Brant a bi rnicla glaucogastra ( Brehm) 33 canadi mis en n«il< uxix ( Linn.) ,.'■ Bubo virginianus pallesa ns stone ::: Buffalo. See Bison. B ufo cog mil ax Say 53 lentiginosus > oodhoust i I <;irard) 52 Page Bum blebee 58 Bui in borealis calurus Cassin 36 swainsoni Bonaparte 30 B utterfly 59 Cull i pi pin squamata sqimmata (Vigors) 33 ( 'allospi 1 mophilus laU ralis I Say) 22 Calyculina 62 Camel 31 Canary 15 ( 11 ids • slot Merriam 28 nubilis Say 28 ( 'iirdiii in < latum Sow 62 ( in podacv 1 cassini Baird 41 imiltaris 42 frontalis Say 42 mexieanus frontalis < Say) 41 obscurus Nobis 42 Castor canadensis frondator Meant- 21 Cat 29 Cathartes auraseptentrionalis Wied 36 ( utherpes mexieanus conspersv-s Ridgway. ... 44 Cattle 2,9,31 Centipede 60 ( 1 iihnccrcvs vrophaxiiniiix 1 Bonaparte 1 34 1 1 ratichthys stt rletus Cope 56 ('in 11 x canadensis 16 Erxl 15 tin inn mi Xelson 16 Chaparral cock 37 ( In 11 It 1 pi rbon n x In/ p< rb' hi 11 x 1 Pallas 1 33 Chickadee 44 Chickaree 22 Chicken !,:;."> Chipmunk 8,22 1 hondestes grammacv-s strigatus Sw ainson. .. 12 g m in '-x hi nryi < a>sin 38 1 Bonaparte 46 III II 11/ ill lir 'lx Iridtci in I i in ul 11 x M iich 21 p /, mux Allen 21 variegatus grammurus I Say 1 21 1 if midophorV'S gularis Baird & GLrard 50 oct ilineatu s Baird 49 sexlineatus ' Linn. 1 49 tessi llatv-s pi rplexus 1 Baird A Girard) 19 Cochlicopa 62 lubrica Sfuller 64 ' 'olaptes caf( 1 1 »rs Conus * til ft rgusoni 62 Sow 62 ps 1 1 2 aris 62 73 74 INDEX ('ORAI Corvus braehyrhynehos brochyrhynchos Brehm, hesperis Ridgway cryptoleucus Couch Cory nor hi mix macrotis pallesa ns M Eller ( '( (TTONTATJ : COUGAB Cow Coyote 5 Crane Crotalus conflut ntus confluentus (Say) . . . Crotaphytus eollaris baileyi (Stejneger)... chow Crustaceans ( 'ryptoglaux acadica acadica i Gmelin ) . . . ( yanoct phalus cyanoct phalus (Wied > — Cyanocitta stelleri diademata | Bonaparte) < yanocorax cassinii ( II until ys an nnisoni (Baird) Deer 1,2,3,4,5,6,11 Deer-mouse Dendragapus obscurus obscurus I Say ) Dcndroica auduboni auduboni I Townsend). Dipper Dog Donkey Dove Drrjobatcs villosus leucothorectis Oberholser. monticola Anthony Duck 10,68 40 40 41 40 12 18 30 31 ,11,28 33,46 51 47 40 (50 37 41 39 41 21 ,16,17 20,21 34 43 46 5,6,25 31 4,35 38 38 4,5,33 Eagle 4, 6,36 Kkl 56 Elephant 32 Elk 1, 2, 3, 4, 15 21 61 18 65 49 50 50 50 22 Epimys norvegicus I Erxl. > Erato lilt: I Una Hinds Erithizon epimnthum Brandt Euconulus irochiformis alaskensis Pilsbry Eumeces obsoUtns ( Baird & Girard) F.tilif nia eques aurata Cope ornata Bafrd sirtalis dorsalis Baird iV Girard.. Eulamiaa guadrivittatus (Say) Felts hippolestes Merriam 30 Fiber zibethicus osoyoost nsis Lord lg paliidus M earns 19 Finch 41,42 Fishes 1,3,10,54 Flicker 3s Fly 59 FOX 5,29 10,52,53 i/tiriiiiiniis ( Lesson 1 37 Oeothlynutrich.au occidentalis Brewster 43 Gila monster 47 Qila pandora Cope 55 Giraffe 31 Glavcidium gnoma pinicola Nelson 37 GUycirru U 61,62 1 ."■• 1 15 Goldfinch 4 Gopher 19 Goose 33 Grasshopper 59 Grosbeak 43 Grouse 4,34 Grus canadensis ( Linn.) 33 Guinea pig 17 Gymnogyps californianus (Shaw 1 36 Halixftux leucocephalus leucocephalus I Linn. 1. 36,37 Haliotis sp 62 Hare 17 Hawk 4, 6,36 Heron 46 Heterodon nasicus nay/ens 1 Baird & Girard).. 50 Ilolbrookia macvlata maculata ( < lirard 1 47 Homo sapiens 9,11,12 Hornet 59 Hornyhead 56 Horse 2,9,11,26,3(1 Hummingbird 4,39 Hybognathus nuchalis A.gassiz 55 Hybopsis aestivalis (Girard) 56 Hylocichlafuscescens salicicola Ridgway 44 Hypsilepis iris Cope 55 Insects 56 Invertebrates, lower 67 Iridoprocnt bicolor I Vieillot 1 43 Jackrabbit 7, 17 Jay 4,39,40,41 Junco 42 J unco phaeonotus caniccps 1 Woodhouse) 42 dorsalis Henry 42 Killdeer 46 Lagopus leucuruf altipett ns < >sgood 34 /< in- mux (Swainson ) 34 Lark sparrow 42 Leech 67 Lejms bairdi Hayden 17 californicus it minus Waterhouse 17 caUotis \\ n.L'ler 17 campestris Bach 17 Lice 59 Lizards 10,47 Llama 6 Locust 59 Lutra canadt nsis 1 Schreher - 23 sonora R hoa la 23 Lutreola 1 ison 1 nergumt nos Bangs 23 Lymnsea 61 tit sidiosa Say 63 ohrussa Say '■ • nut us/ ris M iiller 63 Macaw 4 5 Magpie 39 Marmota flaviventer (Aud. & Bach) 21 Marten 2-3 Mattes riiutiiiu <>,■ mi nes Rhoads 23 Meadowlarks 1/1 In in r /us erythrocepholus (Linn.) 38 Meleagris gallopava merriami Nelson 34 Melongena patula fi2 Rod. & Sow 62 Mi lospiza faUax 4 - melodia morUana Henshaw 42 Mi phitis mesomelas variant I fray 24 INDEX 75 Page Microtus mordax Merriam 19 Mim us polyglottos leucopterus (Vigors) 43 Mink 23 Mockingbird 43 mollusks 61 Monkey 12 Mosquitoes 00 Mountain lion 30 Mountain sheep 1,3,4,14,15 Mouse IS, 19, 20, 21 Mule 31 MUSKRAT 19 Mhs musculus Linn 21 Mustela a mericana Turton 23 arizonensis Mearns 23 streatnri leptus Merriam 23 Myadestes townsendi (And.) 44 Myotis lucifugus longicrus ( True) 12 Myeiapods CO Neotoma albigula Han ley 19 cinerca omit sit s Merriam 20 mi xica an fallal Merriam 20 NlGHTHAWK 38 Notropis dilectus Girard 55 lutrensis Baird and Girard 55 simu-i Cope 55 Nucifraga 'colu mbiana ( Wilson ) 41 Nutcracker 40,41 Nuthatch 4.44 Odocoileus mm ricanus macroums (Raf.) 17 hemionus ( Raf. ) 10 Oliva a ngulata 02 Lain 02 biplicata Sow 62 hiatula < Imelin 62 Olirtlla 01 biplicata Sowerby 61 Orcuhilis 01,02 concentrate Dall ii4 strigosa depressa Ckll 04 Gould 04 Otter 21 Otus asio aikt ni ( Brewster) 37 tin in nit olus tin m meolus ( Kan p) 37 Oris canadensis Shaw 14, 15 Owl 4,0,11,37 Pa ntostt us in rrovii ( ( 'ope > 55 ph In ins Baird & I ; irard 55 Passer domesticus ( Linn, i 43 Peacock 45 Pectunculus giganteus Reeve 02 Peiecypoda 02 Penthestes atTicapillusseptentrionalisi Harris) . 14 gambeli gambeli ( Ridgway ) 44 /■< rii 'ii ns canadensis capitalis Ridgway 40 Perognalhus apache Merriam 19 tin it sec ns Merriam 19 llnnis Baird 19 Peromyscus leucopus tornillo ( Mearns) 20 mankulatus ru firms (Merriam > . . 20 Iruei (Shufeldl I 20 Phah nnji/iUis nuttalli nuttalli (And. I 38 Phheotomus tibit ticola ( Bangs) 38 PUrynosoma cornutum Harlan 49 douglassii hernandesi \ Girard) ... 48 ornatissimu m(Girard). 48 Page Physa .' oi . 5 a ncillaria Say 05 D'Orbigniana Lea 65" traskii 65 warrenia na Lea 65 Pica pica hudsonia (Sabine; 39 Pickorvus columbinus 40 Picoides americanus dorsalis Baird 38 Pigeon 4,45 "Pine squirrel" 22 I'ipihi arcticus 43 maculatus montanus Swarth 42 megalonyx 43 Pisidium 62, 63 Pityophis catenifer sayi (Sehlegel | 50 sayi mexicanus Dum. & Bib 50 Planesticus migratorius propinquus I Ridg- way) 44 I 'la urn bis parvus Say 63 Poor- will 38 Porcupine is Pratrie dog 21 Procyon Jnlor Linn 25 Pronghorn 15 Ptarmigan 34 Puma 5,30 I'n pilla 62, *u5 blandi Morse 04 muscorum Linne 64 Putorius longkauda Merriam 23 Pyramidula cronkhitei anlhorryi 65 perspectiva Say 65 shimehi cockerelli Pilsbry 05 Q (JAIL 33 Rabbit. .-. 4,5,7, 1 7 R accoon 25 Ra na Imlecina berla ndieri 1 Kalm ) Cope 53 halccina ( Kalm) Cope 53 pipu ns Sehreber 53 virescens brachycephala (ope 53 Hat 8, 19,20,21,32 Rattlesnake 40,51 Raven 40 Redtaii 36 Rkh-wing 5,41 Reptiles 46 Rhinichthys cataractx dulcis < • irard 56 mari/losus Cope 56 Rkhardsonius pulchellus pandora (Cope) HH Road-runner 37 Robin 4. 44 Sage hen ' 34 Salamanders 10,52,53 Salmo mykiss spilurus ( 'ope 55 jilt 11 riiicus Cope ." Salpinctes obsoletus obsoletus [Say] 43 Sapsttckee 38 Sci loporus Irislicluis 4S nndiilains consobrinus (Baird a. Girard) 4s aberti Woodhouse 22 fremonti Aud. & Bach 22 neomexicanus 2! Scorpions 60 Selasphorus platycercus (Swainson) 39 riifns 1 1 . melirj ) 39 76 1NDKX l'age Shi i r 2,14 Shells 61 45 honi Mearas 44 pygma a pygmxa V igors 44 SK1NK 17,49 Skunk 24 Slugs 66 sn uls •"" 63,66 Snakes 10 46,60 Solitaire : 44 Sparrow 4,42,43 Spi lerjn iftwCope 52 Speolytocuniculariahypogxa\ Bonaparte)... . -37 Spermophtxe, striped 21 Sphyrapicus thyroideus (< as: in) 38 M'li'Ki; 10,60 Spilogalt gracilis saxatilii Merriam . 24 U nuts Howell 24 Spizella br< w< ri Cassin 42 Squirrei 4.8,?J 22 SteJlula calliopt i Gould) 39 Strix occidt ntalis occidt ntalis | Xantus) 37 Strombus gait at us Wood 62 Succinea avara Say 65 slr< Ich imia Bland 65 Mi kkh 55 Swallow 43 Sweet-water dace 56 Swift (birr) 39 Swift (lizard) 46, 47 Swine " 0,32 Sylvilagus auduboni neomexicahus Nelson 18 warn ni Nelson IS nuttalli pinetis (Allen) 18 Tachycineta thalassina It pida Meams 43 TamiasduTus (subgenus 1 23 I M; INTULAS 60 Taxi&ea taxus Schreber 24 Thamnophis eques (Reuss 50 Thomomys a uri us pt 1 1 agu - M erriam 19 Thrush 44 I i ' M ' ! 44 1 ( .ADS 10,52,53 IISE 10,52 TOWHEE 42 wrkmani Audubon 44 Trout 54 Page Ti RKET 1,2,4,6,34 I'ti nilt I la 62 hi 61 Kleiner 62 Ti nil. i. 10,52 Urocoptida 6 Urocyon tint nn-argi ntatt us Schreber 29 cinereoargenteus scotti Mearns 29 I is us ti nit rial n as Pallas 24 horribilis horrisi us Baird 24 Ord 24 i in h t is Stejneger 4s ornata Baird & Oirard 48,f0 stansburiana Baird & Oirard i- 1 ti/lnitia 62 cyclophorella Aneey 64 Vertigo coloradensis basidens Pilsbry & Va- natta 64 at mi a n n la Cockerel! ii( i Hi -mi alaskana I (all 65 Vole 19 VULTURl Wapiti 15 Warbler 4:'. Wasp 59 Water ouzel 46 WEASEl 23 Wildcat 5 Wolf 28 WOODCHUt K -'1 \\ oodpeckee 38 Worms 60 \\ REN 43 Xtiiiiinitt /iiw/its jtinilitift /ilia/as i Bonaparte . 41 '> ELLOW-THROAT 43 Zamelodia melanocephala (Swainson) 43 '/a mi nis constrictor flavivi rtiris I Say i 50 1 1 lllstll III /tl/ills lllttlls IS princt [>s Allen 18 Zebra Zt na id ma macroura marginclla (Woodhouse). 35 des 62 arbun US Say 65 o