LIBRARY OF CONGRESS DDDD173H5aD # 1.* "Ta. 1^ . » • ■■ ^ «)' <>^, o^ 46" \VJ \%. <>^ Tin; LIVK8 OF TUK PKESEXT CAXDlDATlvS iM>ii)i;\T AM) \ii i; n:i:sii)i;\ OF tin; imti;i» statks. tONTAIMVO A (•«>Nl>Fr>'^Kn AND IMI'ARTUt. IIIMTtlRY OK TUK I.IVI- rillMC ACTS, A\l> l-ol.inrtl. VIKWS UK TIIR Pf!K«(KXT CANUI1>.\TI> WITH TIIK n.VTKuRMH vV TIIK I'AIITIKM Til KXT, TIIKIK rokTKAITS KlUiM I.UK, TIIKIK I.KTTKUJI uK • . , KTO. (•I\C'IN'NAT[,_IT. M. RILISOX, • ! -v CITY ITHLJi^HINO HOUSE, IJl ^^AIN STREET. riiiLAnELriirA.— D. nt'Lisox, .1 AKl.i: CITY Pt'IlLlSIIINO IIurSE, 33 SOUTH THIRD STHEFT. ST. LOUIS,— C. DREW 1- CO., XO. lis LOCCST STllKET. f;EXEV.\, N. V.,— J. WIIITLKY, JR., DAVI.S' HLOl'K, WATKU STUEET. •D?v £44 . \ 'v-V PREFACE The volume hero presented to the reader has been com- piled with great care from the most authentic sources, and is designed to afford a comprehensive view of the principal incidents in the lives of the distinguished citizens who have been named in connection with the offices of President and Vice-President, [t has not been the aim to furnish mere empty and sounding eulogy, but in an impartial and can- did manner to state the principles of parties, and to describe such traits of character in the respective leaders as entitle them to be considered representative men. The object has been to make such a volume as will be useful to the reader by compressing within as narrow a compass as possible tlie political as well as private history of the times, past and present, in v/hich the distinguished gentlemen selected as standard- bearers by their respective parties, took an active part. Strict impartiality has been observed, and no dispo- sition has been experienced to set forth the claims of the one in more vivid colors, through the disparagement of the others.- -•; ; • ••;;:';" Th.e-o4"d33£ ofIarrai1|-»men^t has been in conformity to the order of tile no'minations, \^hout regard to any preference for individuals- pV'PartiiG&, .which have not been permitted to exert iho; feiighfest' influence upon these pages. Biogra- phers a're' ri'ot" expected 'to' be very diligent in excluding terms of glowing eulogy of their subjects, but everything of the kind has been, as far as practicable, carefully avoided here, the main purpose being to set forth in plain, unosten- tatious narrative, the interesting events of the several lives, leaving the inferences and deductions to be drawn by the reader. All the authentic sources of information at hand iiave been carefully examined, and it is confidently claimed that a useful book is here presented, although it may not be considered very ornamental, (ii) LIFE OF JOHN BELL. CHAPTER I. In aeeordancc with the cceneral plan of this work, which is set fortli elsewhere, we take up the orJer in which the can- didates for the Presidency and V^ice-Prcsidency were nomi- nated by tlieir respective parties. And this brings us to first speak of John Bell of Tennessee, who, in the various alterna- tions and chanj:;cs of party, since at an early age he com- menced his political career, has always maintained, along with his own self-respect, the confidence and esteem of the nation. While he lias been firm and steadfast in the expression of his opinions, which, based upon well-considered reasons, have seldom undergone change, his whole public course has been distinguished by a dignity of character, solidity of argument, and suavity of manner, that entitled him to respectful con- sideration, even from bitter and determined opponents. John Eell is_ a native Tennesscan. and was born near Nashville, February 18, 1797. Ilis parents were in mod- erate circumstances, but having a just sense of its import- auco, furnished him the meat^jof obtaining a sound, health- ful, practical education, which he completed at Cumberland College, afterward Nashville University. At school and at college he was more remarkable for the solidity and thor- oughness of his attainments than for brilliancy, or any of those precocious elements which are supposed to foreshadow future greatness. He was still very young, however, when he passed through the routine of college with his bachelor's degree. lleturning from his academic studies, he selected the law for a profession, as requiring neither capital nor powerful friends, but in most cases successful in proportion to individ- i") LIFE OF JOHN BELL. ual application and ■unremitting energy. It was not neces- sary in the State of Tennessee to go through a long proba- tion j and years of apprenticeship, and thorough acquaintance JOHN BELL. with the practical forms and drudgery of the profession were not deemed necessary to an entrance upon individual legal responsibility, which was left to the eflForts of the young advocates to establish or forfeit by their own merit or want of it. At the early and immature age of nineteen, in the year 181G, a year after the J^ttle of New Orleans and the adjustment of the diifieulties with Great Britain, John Bell was admitted to the bar, and settled in the ensuing year in Franklin, in the county of Williamson, where he was elected a state senator in 18i7, then being but twenty years old. This flattering testimonial of the estimation in which so young a man was held did not dazzle one of his determined temperament ; and with the expiration of his term, closed his labors as a state senator. Besides, with a mind unclouded by ignoble views, and ambitious to obtain the position to whic-li he felt himself entitled, he felt that it was due to his profession that he should place himself in a situation to enjoy its emoluments, and profit by the prestige an intimate LIFE OP JOHN BELL. knowledge of its true clemeats, and its proper interpretation, universally confer. It was, therefore, after consulting bis future prospects with care and calm reflection, that he declined a re-election, and for a period of nine years devoted himself ardently and unflinchiii.uly to the practice of his profession, in which his success fully equaled his expectations, and he found himself in a lucrative business and occupying a prominent position at the ban CHAPTER IL In 182fi, Mr. Bell, who had accumulated a moderate for- tune, was induced to come forward from his retirement, as a candidate for Congress, in opposition to Felix Grundy, a name that was high in the annals of Kentucky and Tennessee, and is still rclcrred to as one of the great names of the period in which he lived, IIo was an ardent friend of General Jackson, whose memorable canvass for the Presidency against John Quincy Adams was then progressing. He had long stood at the head of the bar as a profound jurist. He was recognized as an eminent statesman. The odds were greatly in his favoi', for, in addition to his own vast reputation, he had the prestige of General Jackson's popularity to aid him. The canvass was protracted throughout the year, and was full of excitement; but Mr. Bell, then in the prime of life, fuli of energy, buoyant with hope, calm, deliberate, and determined, pursued it with untiring energy and the most marked vigor. In the face of^hc odds against him, in 1827, then in his 30th year, he was elected by a thousand majority, in a district where it had been thought there was no possi- bility of his success. His course in Congress was so manly, so conservative, so consistent with the wishes of his constit- uents, and he had so firmly riveted himself in their affections, that for seven Congresses, or fourteen years, he continued t<> be re-elected. During this period, which occasionally was one of great bitterness and acrimony, some of the most warmly contested measures were brought forward and discussed, that have ever enoaeed the attention of the National Legislature. In 6 LIFE OF JOHN BELL. many of the most important debates Mr. Bell entered ■witli spirit, and his name was soon recognized amont;; the most distingiiished upon the floor of the House of Representa- tives. ' His speeches, -which were not too frequent, and always well-timed, were generally distinguished for their moderate (one, clear, comprehensive, and statesmanlike views, rather than efforts at brilliancy and effect; and the calm research and investigation of an honest and painstaking student were well-received, and secured their proper share of the p^iblic attention. He was always of the few who do not rise to hear themselves speak, but are prepared for the emergency when it comes. His entrance into national politics was as a friend of Grencral Jackson and John C. Calhoun, but thei'e was a distinctive characteristic that marked his friendship, the warmth of which he was ready to acknowledge ; but it did not persuade him into follies or indiscretions that his calm and mature reflection rejected. Thus, although friendly to General Jackson, he did not blindly adopt his hostility to the United States Bank ; and while he admired Mr. Calhoun, and was rather inclined to second his Tariff views, being unfavorable to the doctrine of protection, he was not ready to follow out the doctrine of nullification. He was evidently always an original thinker, and determined the course for himself to pursue. There was safety in his counsels, because thej were cool and deliberate ; and when convinced of the error of former views, through further investigation, he did not persist in the error, as many have done and would do again, for the sake of appearing consistent ; and thus, while he entered upon his career rather disposed to resist the pro- tective system, and in 1832 made a speech against it, further investigation and a more familmr acquaintance with the sub- ject, not only modified his opinions, bat wrought such a change in them, that he has since become an earnest advo- cate of a system that shall properly afford protection to American industry. Mr. Bell was in favor of a United States Bank, although in 18;J:.J he voted against its re-charter. In so voting, he was not expressing his hostility to the measure, but to the time when it was prematurely pressed into politics, as an additional issue to defeat the re-election of his friend G-enei'al Jackson. He considered it premature, because the charter had four years yet to run, and he was unwilling to counte- nance what he considered a mere j'xditieal scheme. LIFE OP JOHN BELL. 7 He was aware, too, of the views of President Jackson, and felt confident he would veto the bill if its passage suc- ceeded, and his familiarity with that iron will was not at fault. But the veto Avas not the finality, for then came the removal of the deposits, a measure of retaliation in the minds of many, but disclosing a mass of corruption which had not been dreamed of then, but which may have been fully equaled in more modern times. Mr. Bell protested firmly against the removal of the deposits, which gave great offense to the Administration, which was not a little hight- ened by his refusal to vote for the resolution approving the measure. To this may be dated the alienation of 3Ir. Bell from the friendship of the Jackson Administration, for the President was implacable toward all who appeared in any degree disposed to thwart his will, and a coldness im- mediately sprang up which was never afterward reconciled. Nor was an event, which shortly after transpired, calculated to allay the hard feeling. Andrew Stevenson, of Virginia, who had been elected Speaker of the House, resigned that station and accepted the mission to the Court of St. Jaraes. Mr. Bell was elected to succeed him over James K. Polk, who likewise was from Tennessee, and was especially a favorite with the Administration. This was efl'ected by a union of the disaffected Democrats (who, like Mr. Bell, wore opposed to the election of Martin Van Buren as the successor of "his illustrious predecessor") and the AV^higs, which combination succeeded over the Administration candidate. Mr. Bell disapproved of Mr. Van Buren's political ante- cedents, lie did not recognize the celebrated declaration attributed to 3Ir. Marcy, that " To the victors belong the spoils," as a proper political maxim ; and in his speeches in the House on the freedom of elections, he not only viv- idly portrayed the danger to be apprehended from Execu- tive iiiteriiosition and disposal of patronage aS a means of corruption, but his efforts were repeated. Congress after Congress, to procure the passage of laws calculated to check, if not altogether prevent, any such dangerous policy. At that time few recognized any such doctrine, and the rapid strides it made in fastening itself upon government, soon manifested tliat the apprehensions of Mr. Bell were not ill-founded. LIFE OF JOHN BELL. CHAPTER ill. Mr. Bell's rupture with General Jackson, wbo then might liave been considered the embodiment, as he cer- tainly was the head and front of the Democratic party, was complete, when, refusing to support Mr. Van Eurcn, he openly espoused the cause of Honorable Hugh L. White for the Presidency. Notwithstanding all the influence of Pres- ident Jackson, who was fairly worshiped in Tennessee, was freely used for Mr. Van Buren's success, the State gave a decided majority for White, and Bell was re-elected to Con- gress from his district — the district in which the Hermit- age, General Jackson's residence, was situated— by as sig- nal a majority as he had previously received. From this election may be dated the strenuous opposition to the Democratic party, which grew up and continued to increase in Tennessee, until from a most decided Demo- cratic State it came to be regarded as one of the Whig strongholds, and will have been among the last to give way, if indeed, in honor of her own distinguished son, she be not found rallying with all her hosts beneath his banner. When it is remembered that Tennessee was overwhelm- ingly for Jackson, her own distinguished citizen, and even against his appeal, cast her vote for another distinguished son, Hugh L. White ; and when the great name of Clay was before her with a last appeal, she was reluctantly re- corded in his column against her son, James K. Polk ; and now, when the most national, and steadfast, and safe of her politicians, who has always been honored with her confi- dence is presented, is it too much to expect that Tennessee will head the- column for John Bell? But ours is the task of dealing with realities rather than speculation — with the past and not the future. Among the Southern politicians Mr. Bell stood almost alone in expressing his willingness that petitions should be received and respectfully treated, even though praying for the abo- lition of slavery in the District. He would not interpose a barrier to the right of petition. His speeches on the subject are comprehensive, patriotic, and consistent witli LirE OF JOHX BELL. 9 the high prerogative of a statesman. Those of 1836 and 1838 may be pointed to with pride, as reflecting views in conformity to the inculcations of the fathers of our coun- try's institutions, in which the right of petition is triumph- antly sustained. To deny that right under any pretext, was an abridg- ment of the prerogative of the people and at war with the fundamental principles of the government. Even though prayers from the people for what they should not have, originating in improper motive or caprice, might reach Congress, it were better to receive such than that the principle should be established, that the right of petition might be abridged or denied. Mr. Bell stood by the broad Whig doctrine, so eloquently and earnestly advocated by John Quiney Adams. Called to the cabinet of President Harrison, in 1811, as Secretary of War, jMr. Bell, during the brief period for which he occupied that department, exhibited the finest administrative talents. But the death of the venerable President, and the different policy announced by his Constitutional successor, constrained Mr. Bell, through self-respect, to join his colleagues, the heads of the other departments, (except of State,) in tendering tbeir resigna- tion. He had accepted the position under a Whig admin- istration, and could not remain true to himself and to his country by retaining the s-amc in the cabinet of any other. The Legislature of Tennessee appreciated the noble con- duct of their distinguished citizen, in which he had proved his consistency and firmness as a Whig; and a vacancy occurring in the United States Senate, tendered him that position. But there were other claims than his to be regarded, and he had an opportunity of displaying his disinterestedness and entire unselfishness of character. However i)leasing to his pride the appointment might have been, he had other duties to fulfill than the mere gratifica- tion of ambition. In his opinion, the place had been merited by the devoted services of his friend, Hon. Ephraim H. Foster; and Mr. Bell declining the profiered honor, had the satisfaction of witnessing the election of Mr. Foster. This manifestation of generous regard of another, and absence of the covetous selfishness that breaks through and disfigures the character of so many of our public men, beauti- fully illustrate 3Ir. Bell's manly and sterling qualities. 10 LIFE OF JOHN BELL, CHAPTER IV. For six years Mr. Bell detoted his time to his private affairs, which, in all his public life, he had never neglected, and which were in a flourishing condition ; but in 1847 he was induced to leave retirement, and again enter the pub- lic service, which he did by becoming state senator ; and a vacancy happening the same year in the United States Senate, he was elected to that office, and was re-elected in 1853, his terra expiring in 1859. During this long term of public service, no man acquired a more permanent or more national reputation. There was a solidity in every- thing he said and did, that made him seem like one of the fathers of the republic. Like other patriotic senators, he advocated the compromise measures of 1850 ; and, as a settlement of the issues, he desired that Texas might be divided off into states. He was opposed to the Nebraska bill; and his speech on the od of March, 1854, was among the most powerful, if not the very strongest, made against that measure. The impression it produced was so visible. Senator Douglas became uneasy, and put forth all his, powers in its defense. The bill introduced at the previous session had not struck at the Missouri Compromise, but Mr. Bell had opposed it as objectionable, because not neces- sary. " It was an anomaly to establish governments to extend over immense territories, in which there was no white population whose wants required such governments. Tic thought the demand for territorial governments should provide in anticipation of an increase of population by immi- gration and other means; that provision ought to be made lor the tribes beyond Wind Hills and in the llocky Mount- ains ; that information of the number of necessary military posts should be laid before Congress ; and full details of this policy of extending the Government so far beyond the present limits of civilization. There were 300,000,000 acres in these territories. They would support an empire. It was a magnificent idea to build up an immense empire; LIFE OP JOHN BELL. 11 and he knew not wliich most to admire, the genius or bold- ness displayed by Senator Douglas in the conception of and the pressing of the measure to carry out his grand idea. He thought the senator from Illinois had, for some time, a mania for establishing new governments. He was the author of the New Mexico and Utah bills, and also of Washing- tou Territory. [Mr. Douglas was chairman of the Commit- tee on Territories, of which station he was dispossessed sub- sequent to his rupture with President Buchanan, on account of his Kansas policy.] He had already laid the foundations of three powerful governments, and now proposed to erect two more. Not content with the glory of being conditor imperii, the senator was emulous of the fame of darissimus — conditor impcrioriimr 3Ir. Bell also objected to the bill, because of tlie provi- sions touching the Indian tribes. Those Indians who had been cai-ricd to this territory from east of the jMississippi, had been guaranteed a home, never to be surrounded by any territorial government. He contended that the provisions of the bill were in clear violation of the Indian treaties. In this connection he condemned the course of those who made such ado about breaking iiiith with the African race, and had no word to say in behalf of the Indians. "The Wilber- forces of the Senate," said he, "had no word of sympathy with any person if they were not Africans." It was not until the next session, that Senator Dixon of Kentucky offered in direct terms the proposition to repeal the 3rissouri Compromise. He had been worried by the propositions of Northern senators, and members of the House, and newspapers and divines, all urging that the com- promise meant that while those residing north of the line might migrate with their property, and settle in territory t^oulh of the line, no person from a state south of that line might lawfully take his property (slaves) and be protected in its use into territory north of the line. The proposition to extend the line across the continent so as to embrace Cal- ifornia, when knocking for admission as a new state ; and it occurred to 3Ir. Dixon that what was called the Missouri Compromise was no compromise at all. It was useless, if not unconstitutional at the time of its adoption, and he, therefore, urged its repeal. This was incorporated in the Kansas-Nebra.ska act, with the policy that the people of a territory, like those of a state, should manage their institu- 12 LIFE OF JOHN BELL. tions in their own way — a proposition which lias been a bone of contention ever since its inauguration, and at the moment of this writing threatens to rend into fragments the time tried Democratic party. CHAPTER V. Me. Bell, in 1856, took a decided stand (May 27th) on the bill introduced by Senator Slidell for opening the mouth of the Mississippi. The bill had been vetoed by President Pierce, and upon its reconsideration, a warm and animated discussion arose. Mr. Toombs having taken a leading part against the bill, and sustaining the veto, Mr. Bell responded to the Georgia senator very happily. He thought that gen- tleman commenced at the wrong point, in attempting to de- feat apj^ropriations for the removal of obstructions that annually clog the mouth of the river which passes through an immense valley, and in the free and unimpeded naviga- tion of which the whole interior of the country between the Rocky Mountains and the Alleghanies was interested. The expenditure of one or two millions annually in keeping- open the great river would Ibe no more than an equivalent for the expenditures on the Atlantic coast. A short extract to show the practicability of Mr. Bell's views will suffice : " Sir," said Mr. Bell, " wo have the Mississippi washing Tennessee on one exti-emity ; we have the Cumberland running through our state to float off our heavy produce — our cotton and tobacco. The senator from Georgia will allow no improvement for the Mississippi river, because he thinks it unequal ; and he alludes to the fact of Tennessee having spent $10,000,000 in order to enable the people from the interior of that state to send their products to foreign mar- kets, by making a connection with the Georgia roads. Georgia reaps a great benelit from that trade. Charleston shares a portion of it; but the greater benelit of it goes to Augusta and Savannah. We are forced to take our cotton to Savannah and Charleston, at an expense of two or three dollars a bale ; when, if we could take it down the Mississippi, the cost would not be more than one dollar, or one dollar and twenty-five cents." In the discussion of every important measure, Mr. Bell bore a conspicuous part; and, as questions of grave and LIFE OP JOHN BELL. 13 serious import arose, his opinions were looked for with solicitude, as they were sure to be regarded with profound respect. In the Thirty-Fifth Congress, his course on the loading measures brought him still more prominently before the country. Early in 1858, the Legislature of Tennessee passed resolutions instructing the senators, and requesting the representatives of Tennessee, in Congress, to vote for the admission of Kansas into the Union, under the Lccompton Constitution. None, knowing his antecedents, could doubt the position of I\Ir. Bell. On the presenta- tion of these resolutions, he reviewed them at length, and after analyzing them with clearness and no little piquancy, justified himself in declining to act in conformity to them. His colleague, Hon. Andrew Johnson, defended the instruc- tions of the State Legislature, and Mr. Bell taking excep- tions to some of Mr. Johnson's remarks, a debate sprung up, which occupied the whole day, February 23d, 1S58. Both gentlemen not only grew animated but became warm, and personal remarks ensued, which, it was feared, might load to unpleasant results; but two days afterward, like men of honor and true courage, and in a spirit becoming- senators, they made mutual explanations, thus affording an example worthy of imitation, and arranging a difficulty growing out of the heat of discussion, greatly to the satis- faction of their friends and the public. On the 18th of March, 1858, in the great Lccompton debate, Mr. Bell made a very elaborate speech, extending through the entire day, in which he took broad and com- prehensive grounds against the measure. In the course of his argument, he animadverted, at considerable length, upon the remarks of Senator Toombs, who, in substance, had said it was a question of union or disunion; it was no sectional question, but one which concerned the whole country — the North as well as the South. He proclaimed to the Senate, that he had estimated the value of the Union. Mr. Bell, in reply, said: "With him it is a myth, a false idol; and he fears tliat the Simile of Keutucky, which my honorable and eloquent friend, Mr. Critten- den, so well represents, has Avorshiped and loved, not wisely, bni. too well. He hiis brought the question to a point — an issue which it becomes us all to ponder." jMr. Bell had experienced misgivings that there were 14 LIFE OF JOHN BELL. such calculations as the senator from Georgia suggested ; but the evidence had not been such as to awaken very lively fears. A vague and imperfect apprehension had existed ; but now what he had dreaded was an admitted fact. The value of the Union had been calculated — it had been a matter of consideration — of consultation, perhaps ; and an estimate placed upon it. The contingency had arisen, and it must be met with the boldness and direct- ness with which the avowal had been made. It had been placed before the country openly, and he felt it his duty to notice it in every aspect to which his attention had been called by the senator from Georgia. He investigated the subject, and very conclusively showed that the rejection of the Lecompton Constitution would not be a fit pretext for Southern men to agitate disunion ; and that its accept- ance would be a departure from, if not an utter revolution of, the fixed principles of the government. On examining the question on every principle connected with the inalien- able rights of the people, announced by the President and his principal supporters in the Senate, he could not discover that there was really any application for the admission of Kansas into the Union with the assent of the people of that territory. In his opiiiion the "English bill" was no ma- terial improvement; for it provided no basis for a speedy and perniauent adjustment. To him it appeared as a new and further evidence of a desire, upon the part of the lead- ers of the two i'actions, to keep the subject open for further contention. His views were given with the earnestness which the importance of the question in issue demanded. It was a furtlier proof of his disregard of ephemeral popu- larity, and his steadfast devotion to the Union. CHAPTER VI. Mr. Bell, always attentive to the interests of the coun- try, and never backward in expressing his opinions upon public measures of importance, participated in the discus- sion of the Minnesota bill, April 8. 1858, in which he dis- sented from the provisions of the Constitution of the pro- LIFE OF JOHN BELL. 15 posed state, respecting alien suffrage, as in violation of the spirit of the Constitution of the United States, the framers of which having vested tlie power in Congress of providing uniform naturalization laws, could not have contemplated this exceedingly liberal bestowal of suffrage — one of the highest and most distinctive marks and rights of citizen- ship — upon aliens who had not undergone the prescribed routine of naturalization. In former years he had raised his voice against this doc- trine, and had pointed out the abuses to which it might lead ; but a contrary opinion seemed to prevail in the councils of the nation, and among the people both North and South, and it only rcioained for him to repeat his con- victions of public policy and propriety in the matter, with- out pressing them so far as to vote against the admission of Minnesota under a Constitution open to these objections, especially since, under the construction now admitted by a majority of the Senate, he could have no guarantee that if the Constitution were amended in this regard, while before Congress, it would not be forthwith altered by the people, after their admission, and made to conform to their wishes in respect to alien suffrage. He regretted to find in this, as in other political developments of the time, the indica- tions of an increasing tendency toward a wild and unregu- lated liberty, that deprived of the mild though proper restraints of government, must inevitably end in chaos and confusion, if not disaster. In the discussions of financial matters, Mr. Bell opposed the views of the Administration, not from a spirit of fac- tious opposition, but because he believed the recommenda- tions should not be entertained, sometimes as unnecessary and in many cases extravagant. He supported, with his usual power, the amendment of Senator Fcsscnden, to cur- tail, as far as practicable, the enormous expenditures to which the government had beeu committed by the Admin- istration, ill the inopportune advance of the troops into Utah — inopportune, because undertaken at a season of the year when no sensible or practical man could doubt they would have to pass their winter in the gorges of the Hocky 31oun tains. Again, it was questionable whether the Presi- dent had the legal authority to order our troops into Utah, to act as an escort for l*'ederal oflicers, under the guise of 16 LIFE OP JOHN BELL. a wosse comitatus. But even if lie bad, the exercise of it in the premises was a great abuse. The Fifteen Million Loan Bill, reported from the Finance Committee, was elaborately argued by Mr. Bell, who exam- ined it with great minuteness. Reviewing the circumstances wliieh ostensibly and actually created the necessity of bor- rowing money, he said : "Twelve months ago, \tc had a surplus of t.wcnty millions in the treasnv3\ Now the treasury is bankrupt, and we are running rap- idly in debt, without providing any certain means of liquidation. Should not such a pjrospect rouse the people to inquiry into the finan- cial policy of the Administration? In what other free country would such a condition of affairs be regarded with acquiescence? No British ministry would so far presume on the toleration of a British public as to come before Parliament with a loan bill like that now pending in the Senate of the United States; for since the revolution of 1688, no British public would have allowed such man- agement of the national revenues to pass unchallenged. An unpar- alleled financial revulsion had recently swept over the civilized world. It was the duty of our rulers to have been among the first to descry the coming storm, whereas they seem to have been among the last, if we may judge from the dispositions taken by the present Secretary of the Treasury, in baying up on its eve, the bonds of the Government at exorbitant premiums. I'owerless to avert, they confessed themselves equally incompetent to remedy the disasters which have befallen the trade and industry of the country." When the Navy Appropriation Bill was before the Sen- ate, a spirited debate sprung up, and Mr. Mallory reported, from the Naval Committee, an amendment authorizing the construction of ten steamships. Mr. Bell supported the amendment, on the ground that after the acquisition of our possessions on the Pacific coast, and the rapid development of California and its golden stores, the Navy should be in- creased. In no step that he has ever taken during a long public life, has he manifested a factious opposition to meas- ures of an Administration to which he was politically opposed, or ceased to look to the public welf\ire, regardless of the consequences, in every vote he has given involving appropriations, always according to them his cheerful acqui- escence when meritorious, and throwing all his power and influence in the scale against them when believed to be improper. When senators questioned the right of Congress to do- LIFE OP JOHN BELL. 17 Date lands for the purpose of founding as^ricultural col- leges, Lut had no conscientious scruples when called upon for grants to the several states, in aid of the construction of railroads and other internal improvements, 31r. Bell's discriminating mind could perceive uo difference in the Constitutional power to be exercised. If Congress had the power to grant the public lands in aid of such enterprises, there could be no possible reason why the Constitution should not consent to render assistance to so important a branch of improvement as the establishment of agricultu- ral colleges. Mr. Bell advocated the construction of a Pacific rail- road. He was not restricted to any particular route ; but, like a national man, desired the best. He argued that it now costs the government more than two millions of dollars per annum to convey the mails to California by the pres- ent routes, while the expenses of the army, on our remote Western frontiers, amounted, during the last year, to ten millions of dollars; and there was every prospect that our army would continue to be needed in that quarter. He thought ten millions, as proposed by Senator i^avis of 3Iis- eissippi, too small a proportion for the government to con- tribute to the enterjjrise. Seven years ago he had said that a hundred and hfty millions v.-ere not too much, and his opinioa had undergone no change. So free from sec- tional bias was he, in the choice of routes, that he intro- duced an amendment authorizing the Secretary of the Inte- rior to advertise for proposals to construct three routes : Northern, Southern, and Central ; leaving Congress, at a subsequent day, to select that which, in its judgment, might seem the best. He particularly remarked the singu- lar fact, that those who doubt the propriety of building a Pacifie railroad, because the Constitution is a stumbling- block in their way, unconsciously adopt, in advocating the acquisition of Cuba, the same line of argument which is held to be so unsound when urged by the friends of the railroad. If it was lawful and proper to acquire Cuba, because that fruitful and capacious island was necessary to the military defenses and commercial prosperity of the country, why was it inadmissible to employ the same rea- sons in advocating the construction of a Pacific railroad? A vote being taken, the amendment was rejected ; but, being renewed subsequently, by Senator Simmons, it was adopted. 18 LIFE OP JOHN BELL, CONCLUSION. From this outline of Mr. Bell's public career and opin- ions throuci^li a long life of active service, some idea may be formed of his solid character and great personal worth. The space allotted would not permit many things to bo noticed that would have been read with interest, and have still further illustrated his eminent ability, his reflective and serious consideration of the public interest, and his patriotic virtue. Sufficient, however, has been furnished to show that our Republic has had few sons to whom she is more indebted than to the calm, philosophic, dignified statesman of Tennessee. On the 7th of March, 1859, in announcing the expiration of Mr. Bell's senatorial term, the Nafional Ink-Ilitjcncer, a paper of standard excellence, paid him the following richly merited tribute : " We are sure that we do but give utterance to the voice of a large portion, not only of the people of Tennessee, but of the country at large, when we say that the withdrawal of the Honorable John Bell from the body which he had so long instructed by the wisdom of his counsels, and adorned by the dignity of his demeanor, deserves to be regarded as a serious loss to the public service. Uniting to habits of patient study, those cardinal (jualities of mind which con- stitute the conservative statesman, he had, moreover, acquired, by his long service in ditfereut branches of the Government, an experi- ence which fitted liim, in a singular degree, for the higli functions he has lately discharged with so much credit to himself and useful- ness to the country. It is to be hoped that his withdrawal from public life will prove only temporary, and tliat our national councils may still share in the benefits to be derived from the signal ability he brings to the discussion of all great public measures. That ability has been sufficiently illustrated in the able speeches he has delivered on the topics of political concern which have occupied the attention of Congress during the last past few years ; and we venture to express the hope that a selection from his senatorial efl'orls on great questions of state policy may be gathered into a permanent form, as we are sure they would compare favorably with similar productions of the leading statesmen who have shed luster on our parliamentary annals." Mr. Bell is now of the ripe age of sixty-three, and is remarkable for vigorous health, having led a most regular LIFE OF JOHN BELL. 19 and exemplary life, mingling the utile cum dulci in the most agreeable and prudent manner. He has not found his enjoyments where often vainly sought by others, but la- bored when necessary, nor subjected his powers to the weari- ness of toil beyond a proper endurance ; and tempered pleasure by moderation and prudence. At the expiration of his senatorial term, on the 4th of March, 1S59, he sought retirement and anticipated the enjoyment of private life; but by the Constitutional Union Convention, which assem- bled at Baltimore on the 9th of May, 18G0, after a very har- monious organization and interchange of sentiment among the delegates — nearly every state being represented — it was resolved on the 10th (second day) to go into an election of a National Union Candidate for the Presidency of the United States, and amid great enthusiasm he was nominated. The first ballot resulted as follows: Bell OS-J-, Houston 57, Crittenden 28, Everett 25, M'Lean 22, Graham 22, Botts 9^, Sharkey G, Rives 3, Goggin 3 — whole number, 251. On tlie second ballot, having received a majority over all other candidates, Mr. Bell was nominated by acclamation. It would, perhaps, be an unpardonable neglect to omit from this sketch a fair view of Mr. Bell's opinions regard- ing slavery — the leading subject of controversy and the governing principle in the canvass to which he has been called. An extract IVom his speech in the American Sen- ate, in July 1850, nmst suflice. In this speech he discusses the moral and economical cflects of the " institution," and the legal and Constitutional rights of slaveholders. lie aflirms not only the right of protection to slave property in the territories, but the express recognition of slavery in the Federal Constitution. Ilis views of the economical relations of slavery, are marked by sound sense and dis- tinguished for practical wisdom. What more could be demanded by the patriot, Northern or Southern than such broad national views as these. Mr. Bell said: " It 18 contended fliat the Soiitli is secured in the full benefit of the doctrine held l)y some of the most distinguished ch.ampions of i(s rights, who maintain that the Constitution, priyprio viut for convenience, and under a sense of the propriety of acting in so grave a matter with greater deliberation, I concluded, as I in- formed you at the time by a private note, to defer a formal accept- ance until after my arrival at home. "Now that I have had all the leisure I could desire for reflection upon the circumstances under which the nomination was made, the purify of the motives and the lofty spfrit of patriotism by which the Convention was animated, as evinced in all its proceedings, I can appreciate more justly the liouor done me by the nomination; and though it might have been more fortunate for the country had it fallen upon some one of the many distinguished statesmen whose names were bi'ought to the notice of the Convention, rather than myself, I accept it with all its possible responsibilities. Whatever may be the issue of the ensuing canvass, as for myself I shall ever regard it as a proud distinction — one worth a lifelong etfort to attain — to be pronounced worthy to receive the liigiiest olFicc in the govern- ment, at such a lime as the present, and by sucli a Convention as that which recently met in Baltimore — a Convention far less impos- ing by the number of its members, large as it was, than by their high character. In it were men venerable alike for their age and their public services, who could not have beeu called from their voluntary retirement from public life but by the strongest sense of patriotic duty; others, though still in the prime of life, ranking with the first men of the country by honors and distinctions alreaily acquired in high official positions, state and national; many of them statesmen worthy to fill the highest office in the government; a still greater number occupying the highest rank in their respective pro- fessional pursuits; others, distinguished by their intelligence and well-earned influence in various walks of private life, and all ani- mated and united by one spirit and one purpose — the result of a strong conviction that our political system, under the operation of a complication of disorders, is rapidly approaching a crisis when a speedy change must take place, indicating, as iu diseases of the phys- ical body, I'ecovery or death. "The Convention, in discarding the use of platforms, exacts no pledges from those whom they deem worthy of the highest trusts uuder the government, wisely considering that the surest guarantee of a man's future usefulness and fidelity to the great interests of the country, in any official station to which he may be chosen, is to be LIFE OF JOHN BELL. 25 found in his past history connected with the public service. The pledge implied in my acceptance of the nomination of the National Union Convention is, tliat, should I be elected, I will not depart from the spirit and tenor of my past course; and the obligation to keep Uiis pledge derives a double force from the consideration that none is required from me. "You, sir, in your letter containing the official announcement of my nomination, have been pleased to ascribe me tlie merit of moder- ation and justice in my past public career. You have likewise given me credit for a uniform support of all wise and benevolent measures of legislation, for a firm resistance to all measures calculated to en- gender sectional discord, and for a lifelong devotion to the union, harmony, and prosperity of these states. Whether your personal par- tiality has led you to overstate my merits as a public man or not, in your enumeration of them, you have presented a summary — a basis of all sound American statesmanship. It may be objected that noth- ing is said in this summary, in express terms, of the obligations im- posed b}' the Constitution, but the duty to respect and observe them is clearly implied; for without due observance in the conduct of tluj Governnicnt, of tlie Constitution, its restrictions and requirements, fairly interpreted in accordance with its spirit and objects, there can be no end to sectional discord — no security for the harmony of the Union. "1 liave not the vanity to assume that, in my past connection with the public service, I liave exemplified the course of a sound American statesman; but if I have deserved the favorable view taken of it in your letter, I may hope, by a faithful adherence to the maxims by which 1 have heretofore been guided, not altogetlicr to disappoint the confidence and expectation of those who have placed me in m.y pres- ent relation to the public; and if, under Providence, I should be called to preside over the afl'airs of this great country as the Execu- tive Ciiief of the Governmcat, the only further pledge 1 fee4 called upon to make is, that to the utmost of my ability, and with whatr ever sirengili of will 1 can command, all the powers and iulhience belonging to my ofliiial station shall be employed and directed for the piomotion of all the great objects for wliich the Government was instituted, but more especially for the maintenance of the Constitution and the Union against all opposing influence and tendencies. ''I can not conclude tliis letter without expressing my high gratifi- cation at the nomination to the second olHce under the government, of that emiucntlj' gifted and distinguished statesman of Massachusetts, JMwai-d Everett, a gentleman held by general consent, to be altogether worthy of the first. "Tendering my grateful acknowledgments for the kind and cotn- plimeutary remarks with wliich you were pleased to accompany iko communication of my nomination, "I am, dear sir, with the highest respect, "Y'our obedient servant, "JouN Bell." 3 LIFE OF EDWARD EVEFxETT. CHAPTER I, This distinguislied American citizen, to wLoii. no office can bring additional honors, or slied a more brilliant renown, was born in the tovv^n of Dorchcstor, Norfolk eoiinty, Massa- chnsetts, in April, 1794 ; and is consequently sixty -sis years of age. He is descended from one of the earliest settlers of MasDaehusetts Bay, who established himself at Dedham, where the femily yet remains. As our space is limited, only a brief outline can be given of his own career, precluding the pleasing task of glancing at -his connections and sur- roundings through his eventful progress. After going to the public schools of Dorchester and Boston, and attending for a year a school kept by Daniel Webster's bxother Ezekiel, he was prepared for college at Exeter, N. H., then under the charge of the distinguished Dr. Benjamin H. Abbott. He entered Harvard when little more than fourteen, and was only seventeen when he graduated witli its highest honors. In determining upon a profession, his first iueliaation was to that of the law, but he preferred divinity, and pursued this study two years, during a portion of which time he acted as tutor at Cambridge — his alma rnafer. Pie was not twenty years old when he was called to succeed Mr. Buckminster, an early friend, in the Brattle-street Church in Boston, and entered upon his duties with great zeal — in fact, impaired health was the resutfc of his zealous efforts, A biographer has said, " His discourses even at this early age, and succeed- ing so eloquent a jn'eacher as Buckminster, drew very decided attention, and their hearty, honest eloquence created expect- ations which were not disappointed." The following year, 1814, he published "A Defense of i26) LIFE OP • EDWARD EVERETT. 27 Christianity," an elaborate treatise of five hundred pages, iu answer to " The Grounds of Christianity Examined," by Georj^e B. English. Of this complete exposition and suc- cessful efibrt, considering his youth, it was said to be among " the most remarkable productions of the human mind." It was in this same year that a Greek professorship was estab- lished at Cambridge by Samuel Elliott of Boston, and Mr, Everett was invited to the new chair, with tlie tempting offer of leave to visit Europe to recruit his health, an ofcr which ho accepted and departed fur Europe in 1815. A\.^' EDWARD EVEEETT. During his absence he remained at Gottingcn two years, acquiring the German language and making himself ac- quainted with those branches of ancient literature appro- priate to his professorship, traveling in Saxony, Prussia, and Holland during vacations. He spent the winter of 1817-18 in Paris, and in the spring went to England, where he be- came acquainted with Scott, Byron, Mackintosh, Jeflrcy, Campbell, Romilly, and Davy. After a winter in Italy and Greece, in 1819 he returned home and entered upon the duties of his professorship. He gave a new impulse to the study of classical literature by a series of brilliant lectures upon Greek literature and ancient art, first delivered to the 28 LIFE OF EDWARD EVERETT. students at Cambridge, and afterward repeated before large audiences at Boston. At the same time lie took the editor- ship of the North American Revieio, which he conducted till 1824. His object iu assuming the charge of this peri- odical was to imbue it with a thoroughly national spirit; and in pursuance of it he contributed a series of articles, in which this country was defended with great spirit against the shallow and flippant attacks of several foreign travelers. He also found time to prepare and publish a translation of Buttman's Greek Grammar. In 1824, he made his first essay in that department of demonstrative oratory, which he has since cultivated with such signal success, by the delivery of a discourse before the Phi Beta Kappa Society on the " Circumstances favorable to the progress of literature in America." An immense audience came to hear him, attracted partly by his own fame, and partly by the v/ish to behold Lafiiyette, who was present at the orator's side. He was heard with the greatest enthusiasm and delight. Our own recollections confirm the strong statements of a writer in the Christian Examiner for November, 1850 : '* The sympathies of his audience went with him in a rushing stream, as he painted, in glowing hues, the political, social, and literary future of our country. They drank witli thiroiy car hiri rapid generaliza- tions and his sparkling rhetoric. The whole assembly put on one countenance of admiration and assent. As with skillful and flying hand the orator ran over the chords of national pride and patriotic feeling, every bosom throbbed in unison to his touch; and when the fervid declamation of the con- cluding paragraph w^as terminated by the simple- pathos of the personal address to Lafayette, his hearers were left in a state of emotion far too deep for tumultuous applause." This was the first of a series of discourses pronounced by Mr. Everett on public occasions between that time and the present, embracing every variety of topic connected with our national history, character, and prospects, and which combine in an eminent degree the peculiar charm of popular oratory, with those substantial merits of thought and style which bear the cold criticism of the closet. Mr. Everett's public life began in 1824, when he was nominated and elected to Congress by the constituency of the district in which he resided. His nomination was a spontaneous movement on the part of the young men of his district, almost without distinction of party. He was himself, as might naturally be expected, a supporter LIFE OF EDWARD EVEKETT. 29 of the administration of Mr. Adams, then just elected Pres- ident. Mr. Everett served by successive re-elections, ten years in Congress, and during the whole period he was a member of the Committee on Foreign Aifairs, perhaps the most important one at that time in the House. In the 20th Congress, though generally acting with the minority, he was chairman of that committee, having been selected for that post by the Democratic speaker, Mr. Stevenson of Yirginia. He also held a place on all the most important Select Com- mittees raised while he was in Congress, and in every instance he was selecte>raska bill, and gilded over by its advocates with the specioiH phrases of non-iurterveii- tion and popular sovereignty, is really and clearly aconipleie surren- der of all the ground hitherto asserted and maintained by the Federal Covernment., with ref=pect to the limitation of slavery; is a plain con- fession of the right of the slaveholder to transfer his human chattels to any part of the public domain, and there hold them as slaves as long as inclination or interest may dictate; and that this is an at- tempt totally to )-everse the doctrine hitherto uniformly held by statesmen and jurists, that slavery is the creature of local and state law, and to make it a national institution. " Resolved, That as freedom is national and slavery sectional and local, the absence of all law upon the subject of slavery presumes the existence of a state of freedom alone, while slavery exists only by positive law. ^^ Reno/vrd, That we heartily approve the course of the freemen of Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa, Ohio, Indiana, Wii^consin, New York, Michigan, and Maine, postponing or disregarding their minor dift'er- euce of opinion, or preferences, and acting together cordially and trustingly in the same cause of freedom, of free labor, and free soil, and we commend their spirit to the freemen of this and other states, exhorting each to renounce his party whenever and wherever that party proves unfaithful to human freedom." Although the organization was formed late in the season, and was far iVnm being perfect, the election that year was disastrous to the Democracy who had been led by Mr. Doug- las. Of the nine Congressional districts, the opposition car- ried five, and the Legislature would have been revolution- ized if it had not been lor the number of senators holding over. As it was, in the House, the Anti-Nebraska members numbered forty, and the Democrats thirty-five. In the Sen- ate there were seventeen Democrats to eight Opposition. Of the former there were three holding over, who were counted on the anti-Nebraska side, which summed up a majority of two, on joint ballot, in favor of the hitter. A United States senator was to be elected by this Legisla- ture in the place of (.leucra! Shields, whose term expired on the 4th of March, 1855 ; and this was the first time in the history 56 LIFE OF ABBAHAJI LINCOLN. of the State where there was a possibility of electing any other than a Democrat. Mr. Lincoln was recognized as the choice of his party, but foreseeing that a difficulty might occur, which it was in his power to obviate, he magnanimously stepped forward, and urged his friends to transfer their sup- port to Mr. Trumbull, who could secure the full vote of the anti-Ne}jraska Democrats, which he had reason to believe he himself could not. On the first ballot, he received 45 votes, Shields 41, Trumbull 5, and 8 scattering. On the seventh ballot, Matteson, Democrat, received the entire Democratic vote with two exceptions, making 44 : and on the tenth bal- lot Mr. Trumbull received 51 votes, Matteson 47, thus giv- ing Illinois a llepublican senator, through the insti"umental- ity of Mr. Lincoln, who would not permit his personal claims to come in conflict with what he considered the advantages of his party. CHAPTER VI. On the 29th of May, 1856, the Eepublican State Conven- tion of Illinois, which met at Bloomington, and appointed delegates to the Philadelphia Convention of that year, adopted the following Preamble and Resolutions : "Whereas, The present Administration has prostituted its powers, and devoted all its energies to the propagation of slavery, anel to its extension into territories heretofore dedicated to freedom, against the known wishes of the people of such territories, to the suppression of the freedom of speech, and of the press; and to the revival of the odious doctrine of constructive treason, which has always been the resort of tyrants, and their most powei'ful engine of injustice and oppression; and whereas, we are convinced that an elTort is making to subvert the principles, and ultimately to change the form of our government, and which it becomes all patriots, all who love their country, and the cause of human freedom to resist; therefore, " Resolved, That, foi'fegoing all former dilferences of opinion upon other questions, we pledge ourselves to unite in opposition to tlie present Administration, and to the party wliich upholds and supports I it, and to use all honorable and Constitutional means to wrest the i government from the unworthy hands which now control it, and to bring it back, in its administration, to the principles and practices of AVashington, Jetfersou, and their great and good compatriots of the Revolution. LIFE OF ABRAHAM LliNX'OLN. 57 " Resolved, That we bold, in accordance with the opinions and practices of all the great statesmen of all parties, for the first sixty years of the administration of the government, that under the Con- stitution, Congress possesses full power to prohibit slavery in the territories; and, that while we will maintain all Constitutional rights of the South, we also hold that justice, humanity, the princi- ples of freedom as cspresseil in our Declaration of Independence, and our Nntional Constitution, and the purity and perpetuity of our Government require that that power should be exerted to prevent the extension of slavery into territories heretofore free. " /i'«»oii'«^^'hat the repeal of the Missouri Compromise was unwise, unjust, and injurious; in open and apgravared violation of tlie plighted faith of the States; and that the attempt of the present Administration to force slavery into Kansas against the known wishes of the legal voters of that territory, is an arbitrary and tyiannous violation of the rights of the people to govern themselves; and that we will strive by all Constitutional means, to secure to Kansas and Nebraska the legal guarantee against slavery, of which they were deprived, at the cost of the violation of the plighted faith- of the nation. ^^ lirsolvpcl, That we are devoted to the Union, and will, to the last extremity, defend it against tlie efforts now being made by tlie dis- uaionists of this Administration to compass its dissoUuion; and tliat we will support the Constitution of the United States in all its pro- visions, regarding it as the sacred bond of our Union, and the only safeguard for the preservation of the rights of ourselves and our jiosterity. '■' licsolvdl, That we arc in favor of the immediate admission of Kansas as a member of this confederacy, under the Constitution adopted by llie people of said territory. '^ Jicisoived, That ilie spirit, of our institutions, as well as the Con- stitution of our country, guarantees the liberty of conscience as well ns political freedom ; and that we will proscribe no one, by legisla- tion or otherwise, on account of religious opinions, or in consequence of place of birth. '■'^ Resolved, That in Lyman Trumbull, our distinguished senator, the people of Illinois have an able and consistent exponent of their principles; and that his course in the Senate meets with our unquali- fied approbation." This was the creed of the Illinois llepublicans in the mem- orable canvass of 1S5G ; and they would liave stiecceded, but for the unfortunate fact that there was a double ticUeL oi' candidates for President and \' ice-President in the field, and while Col. W. il. IJissell was elected (Jovernor by a hand- some majority, the electoral vote of the State was given to Buchanan. In this canvass, Mr. Lincoln was extremely active, and wherever his tall form had been seen, and his manly voice raised, the ranks of the adversary were tiiiuned LIFE OP ABRAHAM LINCOLN. if not scattered. But for the unexpected vote of the south- ern part of 'the State, (known as " Jilgypt," on account of the exceeding ignorance which abounds there, and not, as some have supposed, its exceeding fertility,) the State would then have been lost to the Democracy. CHAPTER VII. And now approaches a period in the life of Mr. Lincoln, in which he was brought more prominently to the notice of the American people than ever before. The administration of Mv. Buchanan, regardless of the pledges on which he was elected — reckless of the platform on which he so cozily re- clined, and untrue to the rights of freemen, had determined that Kansas should be introduced into the family of states, with a slave Constitution. This brought the xldministration into immediate collision with Mr. Douglas, but did not relieve that gentleman from the suspicions which had been attached to his course by his political adversaries, among the most powerful, constant, and consistent of whom Mr. Lincoln might be reckoned. On the 20th of June, 1857, Mr. Lincoln made his famous speech at Springfield, in reply to the speech of Mr. Douglas, made two weeks previously, on the Utah question, Kan- sas, and the Dred Scott decision. In relation to the former he was entirely conclusive in a few sentences ; and hedged in his distinguished adversary by such irrefragable logic, that escape was impossible. He referred to the position of Mr. Douglas, that the people of Utah were in open rebellion against the United States, and advising the repeal of their territorial organization, attaching them to the adjoining states for judicial purposes. As a specimen of his analytical rea- soning and piquancy, we insert the whole: " I say, too, if they are in rebellion, they ought to be somehow cooiceil to obedience; and I am not now prepared to admit or deny, that the judge's mode of coercing tliem is not as good as any. The Republicans can fall in with it without taking hack anything tliey have ever said. To be sure, it would be a considerable backing down by Judge Douglas, from his much vaunted doctrine of self- government for the territories; but this is only additional proof of what was very plain from the beginning, tliat that doctrine was a LIFE OP ABRAHAM LINCOLN. 59 mere deceilful pretense for the benefit of slavery. Those who could not see that much in the Nebraska act itself, -wliioh forced govern- ors, and secretaries, and judges on the people of the territories, without their clioice or consent, could not be made to see, though one should rise from the dead. " But in all this it is verj' plain the judge evades the only question the Republicans have ever pressed upon the Democracy in regard to Utah. That question the judge well knew to be this: 'If the people of Utah shall peacefully form a State Constitution tolerat- ing polygamy, will tlie Democracy admit them into the Union?' There is nothing in the United States Constitution or law against polygamy ; and why is it not a part of the judge's 'sacred right of self-government' for the people to have it, or rather to keep it, if they choose? These questions, so far as I know, the judge never answers. It might involve the Democracy to answer them eitlicr way, and they go unanswered.'' The Kansas question he dismisses almost as summarily and quite as conclusively, taking the ground that the rel'usal of the Free State men to vote at the election of delegates to the Constitutional Convention was iu consequence of the fact that the people of some whole counties and whole neighbor- hoods in other counties had not been registered, and there- fore could not vote. In no event could there be a fair expression of opinion. As to there being " Free State Demo- crats" there he said: "Allow me to barely whisper my suspicion that there were no such things in Kansas as 'Free State Democrats' — that they were alto- gether mythical, good only to figure in newspapers and speeches in the free states. If there should prove to be one real, living Free State Demociat in Kansas, I suggest that it might be well to catch him, and stutF and preserve his skin as an interesting specimen of that 80on-to-be-e.\tiuct variety of the genus Democrat." In reference to the Dred Scott decision he was more elab- orate, but not less pointed and argumentative. lie reviewed the decision of the Court with rare sagacity and comprehen- siveness, and showed that his wily opponent had not always been so regardful and obedient to the decisions of the Su- preme Court. He pointed to the decision that the U. S. Bank was Constitutional ; but, notwithstanding, General Jack- son had vetoed it, disregarding the decision, and had been sustained by Judge Douglas and those co-operating with him, denouncing the decision, although entitled to quite as much respcfct as that in the Dred Scott case, and applauding the veto of the President. GO LIFE OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN. The passage in tliis speecli, resisting the assumption of Chief Justice Taney, that the public estimate of the bLnck man is more favorable now than it was in the days of the Rev- olution, contains a fair specimen of his eloquence, for which he rarely leaves the straightforward channel of argument : "In some ti'ifling particulars the condition of that race has been ameliorated; but, as a whole, in this country, the change between tlien and now is decidedly the other way; and their ultimate destiny has never appeared so hopeless as in the last three or four years. In two of the five states — ISIew Jersey and North Carolina — that then gave the tree negro the right of voting, the right has since been taken away; and in the third — New York — it has been greatly abridged ; while it has not been extended, so far as I know, to a single additional state, though the number of states has more than doubled. In those days, a-s I understand, masters could, at their own pleasure, emancipate their slaves ; but since then such legal restraints have been made upon emancipation as to amount almost to prohibition. In those days, ' Legislatui'es held the unquestioned power to aliolish slavery in their I'espective States; but now, it is becoming quite fashionable for State Constitutions to withhold that power from the Legislatures. In those days, by common consent, the spread of the black man's bondage to the new countries was prohibited; but now, Congress decides that it will not continue the prohibition, and the Supreme (^ourt decides that it could not if it would. In those days, our Declaration of Independence was held sacred by all, and thought to include all; but now, to aid in making the bondage of the negro universal and eternal, it is assailed, sneered at, construed, hawked at, and torn, till, if its framers coulil rise from their graves, they could not at all recognize it. All the powers of earth seem rapidly combining against him. Mammon is after hinj; ambition follows, philosophy follows, and the theology of the day is fast joining the cry. They have him in his prison-house; they have searched his person, and left no prying instrument with him. One after another, they have closed tlie heavy iron dooi's upon him; and now they have him, as it were, bolted in with a lock of a hundred keys, which can never be unlocked without the concur- rence of every key ; the keys in the hands of a hundred ditt'erent men, and they scattered to a hundred ditierent and distant places ; and they stand musing as to what invention, in all the dominions of mind and matter, can be produced to make the imjiossibility of his escape more complete than it is. "It is grossly incorrect to say or assume that the public estimate of the negro is more favorable now than it was at the origin of the government."' In reference to the Declaration of Independence, Mr. Lin- coln regarded its language plain and unmistiikable. lie said: LIFE OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN. Gl "I think the authors of that notable instrument intended to include all men, but they did not intend to declare all men equal in all respects. They did not mean to say all were equal in color, size, intellect, moral developments, or social capacity. They defined, with tolerable dis- tinctness, in what respects they did consider all men created equal — equal witli 'certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.' This they said, and this they meant. They did not mean to assert the obvious untrutli, that all were then actu.ally enjoying that equality, nor yet that they were about to confer it immediately upon them. In fact, they had no power to confer such a boon. They meant simply to declare the rif/lu, so that (he enforcement of it might follow aa fast as circumstances should permit." On the IGth of June, 1858, the Kepublican convention of Illinois assembled at Sprinj^field, nominated state officers, and adopted a platform not differing- in any essential respect from that asserted two years before at Eloomington. The c-uurse of the Honorable Lyman Trumbull was indorsed, and ^e following resolution unanimously adopted ; '■'■Resolved^ That Abraham Lincoln is the first and only choice of the Republicans of Illinois for the United States Senate as the successor of Stephen A. Douglas.'' Mr. Lincoln was not aware of the adoption of the resolu- tion, and when called upon to address the Convention did not allude to it. His speech, however, on that occasion, was a masterly effort, and was received by a crowded hall, lobbies, and galleries, with manifestations of the greatest enthusiasm. As the opening paragraph of that speech was made to serve as a sort of text for the notable campaign between himself and his distinguished adversary, it is here quoted : " If we could first know where we arc, and whither we are tend- ing, we could then better judge what to do, and how to do it. We are now far on into the filth year, since a policy was initiated, with the avowed object and confident promise of putting an end to slavery agi- tation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but lias constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed. 'A house divided against itself can not stand.' I believe this Government can not endure, permaucnlly, half slave and half free. I do not expect- the Union to be dissolved — I do not expect the house to fall — but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the fnr- tiier spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates G'J LIFE OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN. •will push it forward, till it shall hccome a.like lawful in all the slates, old as well as new— North as well as South. "Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almotit complete legal combi- nation- — piece of machinery, so to speak — compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. Let him consider not only what work the machinery is adapted to do, and how v/ell adapted, but also let him study the history of its construction, and trace, if he can, or rather fail, if he can, to trace the evidences of design, and concert of action, among its chief master-workers from the beginning. " But, so far. Congress only had acted ; and an indorsement by the people, real or apparent, was indispensable, to save the point already gained, and give chance for more. The new year of 1854 found slavery excluded from more than half the states by State Constitu- tions, and from most of the national territory by Congressional pro- hibition. Four days later commenced the struggle, which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition. This opened all the na- tional territory to slavery, and was the tirst point gained. '•This necessity had not been overlooked, but had been provided for, as well as might be, in the notable argument of ^squatter sovei^ ei;/}Ui/,' otherwise called ^sacred right of self-government,'' which latter phrase, though expressive of the only rightful basis of any goveru- raent, was so perverted in this attempted use of it^ as to amount to just this: that if any one man choose to enslave another, no third man shall be allowed to object. That argument was incorporated into the Nebraska bill itself.'' On the ninth of July, Mr. Douglas w;is received with much pomp at Chicago, where he thanked the Ilepublicans for hav- ing- aided in defeating the President's Leeompton policy, and in reference to Mr. Lincoln, uttered the following significant language : "I have observed, from the i)u1)lio priuiy, ihal ))at a few days ago, the Republican paily of the 8ia,le of lllinnis assembled in conven- tion at Springfield, and not only laid down their platform, but nom- inated a candidate for the United States Senate as my successor. 1 take great pleasure in saying that I Jiavc known, personally and intimately, for about a quarter of a century, the worthy gentleman who has been nominated for my place; and 1 will say that I regard him as a kind, amiable, and intelligent gentleman, a good citizen, and an honorable opponent; and whatever issue I may Jiavc with Mm will be of principle, and not involving personalities." Mr. Douglas then reviewed the position assumed by Mr. Lincoln, in his speech of June 16th, to which the latter, who heard the speech of his adversary, replied the following LIFE OP ABRAHAM LINCOLN, QS evening, July lOtli, in which reply is the following pointed extract : "There was one questiou to which he asked the attention of the crowd, which I deem of somewhat less importance — at least of pro- priety for me to dwell upon — than the others, which he brought in near the close of his speech, and which I think it would not be entirely proper for me to omit attending to, and yet, if I were not to {t'wc some attention to it now, I should probably forget it altogether. V/hile I am upon this subject, allow rac to say that I do not intend to indulge in that inconvenient mode sometimes adopted in public speaking, of reading from documents; but I shall depart from that rule so far as to read a little scrap from his speech, which notices this first topic of which I shall apeak — that is, provided I can find it in the paper. " ' T made up my mind to appeal to tho poople agaiust the conibioation tliat lias I)eon mode agaiost me ! tho Kopublican Itradere having: funnrd an alliance, an un- holy and an iinnatnral allianoc, with a portion of unscrupnlons PVdeial otlice-holdern. I intend to fight that allied army wherever I meet them. I know they deny the alliance, but yet these men who are trying to diviiJo the Democratic party fur the piirpOMO of electing a liopublican senator in my place, are just as much the agents and tools of the supporters of Mr. Lincoln. Hence I shall deal with this allied army Juat as tho RunnianH dealt with tho allies at .Seb;i.stopol — that is, the Russians did not stop to inquire, when they fired a broadside, whether it hit an Englishman, a Frenchmau, or a Turk. Nor will 1 stop to inquire, nor shall I hesitate, whether my blows shall hit these Republican leaders or tUeir allies, who are holding tho Fed- eral otEccs, and yet acting iu concert with them.' " Well, now, gentlemen, is not that very alarming? Just to think of it! right at the outset of his canvass, I, a poor, kind, amiable, intelligent gentleman, am to be slain in this way. Why, my friends, the judge is not onl}', as it turns out, not a dead lion, nor even a liv- ing one — he is the rugged Russian bear! [Laughter and applause.] '•But if they will have it — for he says we deny it — that there is any such alliance, as lie says there is — and I don't propose hanging very much upou this question of veracity — but if he will have it that there is such an alliance — that the Administration men and we are allied, and we stand in the attitude of English, French, and Turk, he occupying the position of the Russian, in that case, 1 beg that he will indulge us while we barel}' suggest to him that these allies took .Sebastopol. [Great applause.]" In the eourijc of this reply, Mr. Lincoln defined his posi- tion in regard to the negro, in unmistakable language ; " 1 have said a hundred times, and I h.ave no inclination to take it liack, that I bflievc there is no right, and ought to be no inclination in the people of the free states to enter into theslavc states, and to interfere with the question of slavery at all. I have said that alway.-?. .ludge Douglas has heard me say it, if not quite a hundred times, at least as good as a hundred times; and when it is said that I am in favor of interfering with slavery where it exists, I know that it ia 64 LIFE OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN. unwarranted by anything I have ever intended, and, as I believe, by anything I have ever said. If, by any means, I have ever used lan- guage -which could fairl_y be so construed, (as, however, I believe I never have,) I now correct it. " So much, then, for the inference tliat Judge Douglas draws, that I am in favor of setting the sections at war with one another. I know that, I never meant nny such thing; and I believe that no fair mind can infer any such thing from anything I have ever said. "Now, in relation to his inference that I am in favor of a general consolidation of all the local institutions of the various states, I will attend to that for a little while, and tr}' to inquire, if I can, how on earth it could be that any man could draw such an inference from anything I said? I have said, very many times, in .Judge Douglas's hearing, that no man believed more thau I in the principle of self- government ; that it lies at the bottom of all my ideas of just govern- ment, from beginning to end. I have denied that his use of that term applies properly. But for the thing itself, I deny that any man has ever gone ahead of me in his devotion to the principle, whatever he may have done in efficiency in advocating it. I think that I have said it in your hearing, that I believe each individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases Avith himself and with the fruit of his labor, so far as it in no wise interferes with any other man's rights — [applause] — that each communit}"^, as a state, has a right to do exactly as it pleases with all the concerns within that state that interfere with the right of no other state ; and that the General Government, upon prin- ciple, has no right to interfere with anything other than that gen- eral class of things that does concern the whole. I have said that at all times. I have said, as illustrations, that I do not believe in the right of Illinois to interfere with the cranberry laws of Indiana, the oyster laws of Virginia, or the liquor laws of Maine. I have said these things over and over again, and I rejieat them here as my sentiments." In continuing this memorable campaign, Mr. Douglas spoke at Bloomington and Springfield a week later ; and Mr. Lincoln responded, at the latter place, the evening of the day on which his adversary spoke at the latter place, (July 17th,) in which he mentioned the disadvantages under which his party labored, through the refusal of the previous Legis- lature, which was Democratic, to give a fair apportionment, for which a census had been taken in 1855. He likewise pointed to the fact, that one or two senators held over in districts wliere he had every reason to believe his friends could succeed, if they only had the chance of an election. There was still another disadvantage, which Mr. Lincoln adverted to with infinite humor ; and there was something of prophecy in the idea of connecting his name with the LIFE OP ABRAHAM LINCOLN. Co Presidency of the United States. Of this " disadvantage" he observed : "It arises out of the relative position of the two persons who staml before the Stale as candidates for the Senate. Senator Doughxs is of world-wide renown. All the anxious politicians of his party, or who have been of his party for years past, have been looking upon him as certainly, at no distant day, to be the President of the United States. They have seen in his round, jolly, fruitful face, post-offices, land- offices, raarshalships, and cabinet appointments, charg;'^ship?, and foreign missions bursting and sprouting out in wonderful luxuriance, ready to be laid hold of by their greedy hands. [Great laughter.] And as they have been gazing upon this attractive picture so long, they can not, in the little distraction that has taken place in the party, bring themselves to give up the charming liope ; but, with greedier anxiety, they rush about him, sustain liim, and give him marches, triumphal entries, and receptions, beyond what even, in the days of his highest prosperity, they could have brought about in his favor. On the contrary, nobody has ever expected me to be Presi- dent. In my poor, lean, lank face, nobody has ever seen that any cabbages were .siiroutiug out. [Cheering and laughter.] These are disadvantages all, that the Republicans labor under. We have to fight this battle upon principle, and upon principle alone. I am, in a certain sense, made the standard-bearer in behalf of the Repub- licans. I was made so merely because tliere had to be some one so placed — I being in nowise preferable to any other one of the twenty- five — perhaps a hundred we have in the Republican ranks. Then I say I wish it to be distinctly understood and borne in mind, that we have to fight this battle without many — perhaps without any — of the external aids wiiich are brought to bear against us. So I hope those by whom 1 am surrounded, have principle enough to nerve them- selves for the task, and leave nothing undone that can be fairly done, to bring about the right result." The distinguished contestants having made several speeches each at various points, an arrangement was agreed upon, by which they should address the people of the seven Congressional districts in which they had not spoken. The debate coiumenced at Ottawa, where ultraisni, by means of a liepubliean platform, which was merely a local expres- sion, was urged against Mr. Lincoln. Freeport was the second place of meeting, where Mr. Lincoln exposed the fallacy of holding him responsible for resolutions passed at a mere casual meeting, or county convention, and which had not been recognized by the Republicans of the State as their unquestioned chart. He responded categorically and unequivocally to sundry questions propounded to him G fi6 LIFE OP ABRAHAM LINCOLN, through the columns of the organ of Mr. Douglas, the Chicago Times. A short extract is subjoined, explanatory of his principles on all the important questions of agita- tion : " As to the first, one, in regard to the fugitive slave law, I have never hesitated to sa.y, aud I do not now hesitate to say, that I think, under the Constitution of the United States, the people of the South- ern States are entitled to a Congressional slave law. Having said that, I have had nothing to say in regard to the existing fugitive slave law, furt.lier than that I think it should have been framed so as to be free from some of the objections that pertain to it, without lessening its efficiency. And inasmuch as we are not now in an agitation in regard to an alteration or modification of that law, I would not be the man to introduce it as a new subject of agitation upon the general questions of slavery. " In regard to the other question, of Whether T am pledged to the admission of any more slave states into the Union? I state to you very frankly that I would be exceedingly sorry ever to be put in a posi- tion of having to pass upon that question. I should be exceedingly glad to know that there would never be another slave state ad- mitted into the Union ; but I must add, that if slavery shall be kept out of the territories during the territorial existence of anj* one given territory, and then the peojile shall, having a fair chance and a clear field, when they come to adopt the Constitution, do such an extraordinary thing as to adopt a slave Constitution, uninlluenced by the actual presence of the institution among them, I see no alter- native, if we own the country, but to admit them into the Union. [Applause.] " The third interrogatory is answered by the answer to the second, it being, as I conceive, the same as the second. "The fourth one is in regard to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia. In relation to that, I have my miml very dis- tinctly made up. I should be exceedingly glad to see slavery abol- ished in the District of Columbia. I believe that Congress possesses the Constitutional power to abolish it. Yet, as a member of Con- gress, I should not, with my present views, be in favor of cndeavoriiu/ to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, unless it would be upon these conditions. First. That the abolition should be gradual ; Seco7id. That it should be on a vote of the qualified voters in the Dis- trict; and Third. That compensation should be made to unwilling owners. With these three conditions, I confess I would be exceed ingly glad to see Congress abolish slavery in the District of Colum- bia, and, in the language of Henry Clay, 'sweep from our capital that foul blot upon our nation.' " In regard to the fifth interrogatoi-y, I must say here, that as to the question of the abolition of the slave-trade between the different States, I can truly answer, as I have, that I am 'pledged to nothing about it. It is a subject to which I have not given that mature con- sideration that would make me feel authorized to state a position so LIFE OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN. 67 as eople and other portions of New England. 82 LIFE OP HANNIBAL HAMLIN. CHAPTER IV. The nomination of Mr. Hamlin, at Chicago, was quite as vmcxpeeted to himself as it conld possibly have been to any one else. He had been a warm friend of Mr. Seward, for whose nomination, as the llepnblioan candidate for the Presidency, he had labored faithfully, and thought not once of his own name in connection with either office. He was chosen, on the second ballot, with great unanimity, and his party, all over the Union, have re-echoed the nomination with a hearty will. One of his biographers draws the following not unpleas- ant picture of Mv. Hamlin's jicrsoiiiwl, with which the portrait at the commencement of this sketch will be found to correspond with considerable accuracy: "Mr. Hamlin is about six feet in hight, though appar- ently less, in consequence of his having a slight stoop. His athletic and robust form gives a just indication of his great physical energy and power of endurance. His com- plexion is dark, and his eyes arc of a piercing blackness. His voice is clear, strong, and melodious in its tones, and his delivery rapid, energetic, and highly effective. He speaks without verbal preparation, but without any embar- rassment, and with remarkable directness. Always talking to the point, and never for mere effect, he is invariably listened to with respect and attention. As a popular ora- tor, Mr. Hamlin has great power and eloquence. He has addressed more public assemblies, undoubtedly, than any other person of his own State." We close this very imperfect and necessarily brief sketch, with JMr. Hamlin's letter of acceptance of the high honor intended for him by the Chicago Convention, with the simple remark, that, if elected, he would discharge any situation devolving upon him with ability and fidelity. "Washington, Mav 30, 1860. "The Hon. George Asiimun, President of the Con-) vention, and others of the Committee: / "Gentlejien: — -Your official communication of the ISth instant, informing dig that the representatives of the Republican parly of LIFE OF IIANXIBAL TIA^rLIN. 83 the Unitod States, assembled at Chicago, on that day. had, by a unanimous vote, selected nie as their candidate foi- ilie office of Vice- President of the United States, has been received, together with the resolutions adopted by the Convention as its declaiation of prin- ciples. "Those resolutions euiinciate clearly and forcibly the principles which unite us, and the objects proposed to be accomplished. They address tiiemselves to all, and there is neither necessity nor propriety in my entering >ipon a discussion of any of tliem. They have the approval of my judgment, and in any action of mine, will be faith- fully and cordially sustained. " I am profoundly grateful to those with whom it is my pride and pleasure politically to cooperate, for the nomination so unexpecledly conferred ; and I desire to tender, through you, to the members of (ho Convention, my sincere thanks for the confidence thus reposed in me. Should the nomination which I now accept be ratified by the people, and the duties devolve on mc of presiding over the Senate of the United States, it will be my earnest endeavor faithfully to discharge them with a just regard for the rights of all. "It is to be observcJ, in connection with tlic doings of the Repub- lican Convention, that a paramount object with us is to preserve the normal condition of our territorial domain, as homes for freemen. The able advocate and defender of Republican principles, whom you have nominated for the highest place that can gratify the ambition of man, comes from a state which has been made wliat it is by special action, in that respect, of the wise and good man avIio founded our institutions. The rights of free labor have been there vindicated and maintained. 'J'iie thrift and enterprise which so dis- tinguish Illinois, one of the most flourishing states of the glorious West, we would see secured (o all the territories of the Union ; and restore peace and harmony to the whole country, by bringing back the government to what it was under the wise and i)atriotic men who created it. If the Republicans shall succeed in that object, as they hope, to, they will be held in grateful remembrance by the busy and teeming millions of future ages. " I am, very truly yours, II. IIajilin." LIFE or STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. CHAPTER I. Stephen Arnold Douglas was born at tlie town of Brandon, Vermont, on the 23d day of April, 1813. His father was a native of New York, and had considerable reputation as a physician. He died suddenly of apoplexy, when his son, Stephen Arnold, was but little more than two months old. The widow, with her infant and a daugh- ter only eighteen months older, returned to a farm, wliich she had inherited conjointly with an unmarried brother. At the age of fifteen, her son, who had received a good common school education, desired to prepare for college ; but his family proving unable to bear the requisite expense, he left the farm, determined to earn his own living, and engaged himself as an apprentice to the trade of cabinet- making, at which he worked a year and a half, partly at Middlebury, and partly at Brandon, when his health became so impaired by the severity of labor that he aban- doned the occupation altogether. He has often since said that the happiest days of his life were passed in the work- shop. He now entered- the academy at Brandon as a student, and remained there a year. His mother was mar- ried, about this time, to Mr. Granger, of Ontario county, New York, to whose son her daughter had been previously married. Young Douglas removed, with his mother, to Canandaigua, and entered, as a student, the academy of that place, reading law, at the same lime, with Messrs. Hubbell, in which he continued till 1833. In June, 1833, he went to the West in search of an eligible place in which to establish himself as a lawyer. He reached Cleveland, but being under twenty-one years of age, and the law requiring him to have been a resident 84 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOTTGLAS. 85 of the State one year before admission to the bar, be accepted the position of clerk in the law-office of the Honorable S. J. Andrews, with a promise of partnership in the future. A severe attack of illness, protracted for several months, however, destroyed this arrangement; and. in the fall Mv. Douglas left Cleveland, in search of some eligible point where he might engage in the practice of the law. His ambition was to appear at the bar, having no doubt of his success. He proceeded, by canal-boat, from Cleveland to the Ohio river, and thence, by steamer, to Cincinnati. . He was feeble in health, and with very few dollars in money. His necessities demanded immediate employment, and he canvassed Cincinnati and Louisville seeking that employment, but failed to iiud any. STj;i'llKX A. DOULiLAS. He then left for St. Louis — an undefined impression that Illinois was to be his ultimate destination leading him on toward that region. Arrived at St. Louis, the Honor- able Edward Bates, a recent aspirant for the Republican nomination for the Presidency, tendered 3Ir. Douglas the free use of his office and library until lie could do better; but ^fr. Douglas's necessities required employment from which he could derive a revenue, and failing to obtain 86 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. such in St, Louis, he pushed on to Jacksonville, Illinois, where he arrived in December, 1833. He was equally unsuccessful at Jacksonville in finding employment; so he proceeded on foot to the town of Winchester, sixteen miles distant. He had but thirty-seven cents in money, and knew not where he was to get more. The next day he encountered a crowd ou the public square, who had been gathered to attend an auction sale ; the sale could not proceed for want of a clerk, and young Douglas was at once appealed to and requested to serve in that capacity. He served three days as a clerk, and received six dollars for his services. He had pleased the farmers very much; he had defended Jackson and his policy with a warmth and a vigor that was unusual. He made known his neces- sities, and, in, one week a school of forty scholars, at three dollars each per quarter, was made up, and Mr. Douglas, entered upon the office of schoolmaster. In a short speech at Winchester, during the Douglas- Lincoln contest, he thus alludes to his entree there; "Twenty-five years ago I entered this town on foot, with my coat upon rny arm, icilhout an acquaintance in a thousand mileis, and toithoiil knowing ivhcrc I could gel money to pay a week's hoard. Here I made (he first six dollars I ever earned in my life, and obtained the first regular occupation that I ever pmsued. For the first time in my life I then felt tluu. the rcrfponsibilitierf of iiii'.nhood were upon me, although I was under age, for I had none to advise with, anil knew no one upon whom I had a right to call for .assistance or friendship. Here I found the then settlers of the country my friends. My first Btart in life was taken liere, not only as a ])rivi'te citizen, but my first election to public olhce by tlie peojde was eonh i red upon me by those whom I am now addressing, and by tlieir i'aihL".'^. A quarter of a century has passed, and that penniless Imy stands before you wilh his heart full and gushing wiili the sentiments which such associa- tions and recollections necessarily inspii'e." In March, 1834, still lacking one month of being twenty- one years old, he was admitted to the bar by the Supreme Court; and with the proceeds of his school, and such small fees as he had earned in the mean-time, by attending cases before the Justices' Court, he purchased some law books, and moved up to Jacksonville, the county-seat of Morgan county, then one of the largest counties in the State. He opened a law office in Jacksonville, and soon was known as an ardent Democrat. General Jackson's b.ink LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS-. 87 policy was then tlie leading public topic, and upon it Demo- crats were divided, and the Whigs were fast gaining strength. The county, owing to the influence of the bank and its branches, had become decidedly Whig in politics. Douglas and some friends called a mass-meeting to defend General Jackson's bank policy, and the movement was con- sidered a most daring one. When the day arrived, he alone had the courage to offer the resolutions. He did so, and advocated their adoption. He was replied to by a Mr. Lamborn, one of the ablest lawyers of the county, in a speech of much severity. It was a trying moment for Douglas. He met the issue. He rejoined in a speech which has become historical in Illinois. In a very short time his words of burning eloquence drove Lamborn from the Court House, and then, for an hour, he held the meet- ing bound in admiring astonishment by his powerful de- fense of the President. When he bad concluded, his reso- lutions were adopted, and he was taken upon the shoulders of several large men, and carried through the town in tri- umph. Henceforth Douglas was recognized as the leader of the Democracy in that county. At the meeting of the next Legislature, he was elected Attorney-General over Colonel John J. Hardin, and, for over a year and a half, performed its duties with great success. In 183G, he pro- posed the convention system for the nomination of candi- dates for county officers ; and, though opposed, carried it into successful operation. A Democratic ticket was nom- inated, but such wa.s the war made upon the convention system that some of the candidates withdrew, and Douglas was ibrced to take a place on the ticket for the Legislature. He canvassed the county thoroughly, and the result was that the entire Democratic ticket, with one exception, was elected. Ceijcral Hardin, always a Whig, was elected. ^V'^hen Mv. Douglas took his seat in the Illinois Legisla- ture, in 183G-7, as a Democratic representative from Mor- gan county, he was the youngest member of the House, but he was active and laborious. MFE OF STEPHEN A DOUGLAS, CHAPTER II. In 1837 Mr. Douglas was appointed by President Van Burcn register of the land office at Springfield, Illinois, a post which he resigned in 1889. In November, 1837, he received the Deujocratic nomination for Congress, although he was under twenty-five years of age, and consequently ineligible. He however attained the requisite age before the day of election, which was the first Monday in August, 1838. His Congressional district was then the most popu- lous one in the United States, and the canvass was con- ducted with extraordinary zeal and enef-gy. Upward of 36,000 votes were cast, and the Whig candidate, Stuart, was declared to be elected by a majority of five only. A number of ballots sufficient to have changed the result, were rejected by the canvassers because the name of Mr. Douglas was incorrectly spelled. After this defeat, which, under the cir- cumstances, was claimed by his friends as a victory, Mr. Douglas devoted himself exclusively to his profession until 1840, when he entered into the Presidential campaign of that year with so much ardor that he traversed the State in all directions for seven months, and addressed more than two hundred political gatherings. To his exertions was ascribed the adherence of Illinois at that election to the Democratic party. In December, 1840, Mr. Douglas was appointed Secretary of State of Illinois. In February, 1811, just seven years after he had been admitted to the bar, he was elected by the Legislature a Judge of the Supreme Court, which office he resigned in 1843, to accept the Deniocratic nomination for Congress, to which he was elected by 445 votes over his competitor, Browning, and in 1844 by 1900 votes. In 1840, he was a third time elected, and by 3,000 majority. An incident is recorded of this period of his life, which so well illustrates the peculiar genius of the man, that we can not refrain from repeating it; it not only speaks vol- umes for Douglas as a far-seeing and sagacious statesman, but it reveals the remarkable ascendency of Brigham Young over his associates, even at that early day. LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 89 " In 1846, the excitement against the Mormons at Naiivoo reached its higrht. The people of the surroimding country determined to drive them away; the Saints resolved to defend themselves, A civil war seemed imminent. Governor Ford dispatched a regiment to pat down both belligerents. This regiment, consisting of four hundred and fifty men, was under command of Colonel John J. Hardin, the old political opponent, but warm personal friend of Mr. Douglas, who held the post of Major. As this little body of troops approached Nauvoo, they saw the Mormons, five thousand strong, drawn up to oppose their advance. Every man of them was known to be armed with a ' Severn shooter ' and a brace of Colt's ' revolvers ' — twenty-one shots to a man, besides a bowie knife, llarilin halted liis troops just out of rifle range and addressed them. ' Tliere are the Mormons, ten to one against us. I intend to attack them. If there is a cow- ard here who wishes to go liome, he may do so now. Let any one who wishes to go step to the front.' Not a man came forward. 'There were, I dare say,' says Mr. Douglas, 'just four hundred and fifty-one of us, including our colonel, who would have been glad to have retired; but not one of us had the courage to own that he was a coward." ' Major Douglas,' said the Colonel, ' will take one hun- dred men, will proceed to Nauvoo, arrest tiie Twelve Apostles, and bring them liore.' 'Colonel ILirdiu,' asked the .Major quietly, so that no one else heard, ' is this a peremptory order?' ' It is.' 'Then I shall make the attempt to execute it. liut I give you warning that not a man of tis will ever return.' 'The Apostles must be taken. Major Douglas,' replied the Colonel. ' Very well, Colonel. If you will send me alone you will be much more likely to get them.' ' But you will lose your life.' ' I will take the responsi- bility. If you send me alone, I will pledge myself to reach the city. As to bringing in the Twelve, or getting back myself, that is quite another question. I will try.' ' Do you assume the responsi- bility ?' ' I do.' ' .Major Douglas,' said the Colonel, after reflecting a few moments, 'will proceed to Nauvoo, taking such escort as he sees fit' " The order was hardly given when the little major — for be was not tlicn a 'Little Giant'— dashed otf at full speed. As he ap- proached the .Mormon legion, General Well came forward to meet him ; and after a brief conversation escorted him through the hol- low square of troops into the city, lie was not long in finding Brig- ham and the Twelve. All of them were old acquaintances of his. Most of them had, in fact, been before him for trial, as judge, upon some charge or other. "The judge is famous for his taking mauners; and in a very brief lime he succeeded in inducing Brigham and his associates to accompany him. Tliey all packed themselves into the 'Apostolic Coach,' drawn by eight horses, and presented themselves in the camp. The fighting was postponed, and negotiations for the removal of the Mormons were entered upon, .Judge Douglas being chief ne- gotiator on one side. Brigham himself said but little ; and at length said he would go out for a while, directing his associates to settle the terms. These were soon informally agreed to by the Twelve, 8 _J 90 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. and they were committed to paper. Brigliam returned and asked how matters had succeeded. He was told that everything had been settled. ' Let me look at the terms,' said Brigham, quietly. He read them over hastily. ' I 11 never agree to them— never 1 ' he exclaimed. The vote was formally put, and the whole Twelve, with- out a dissenting voice, declared against them, though they had as unanimously accepted them not five minutes before. Tlie negotia- tions were then renewed between Brigham and Douglas. New terms were settled; and when the vote was taken the Twelve agreed to them at once. The treaty was duly signed, and the Mormons pre- pared to leave the State." This simple incident, authenticated by irrefragable testi- mony, is indicative of the man of unquestionable courage, who,' before he made a shining mark for the shafts of envy and malice, was recognized as uniting the bland and easy manners of a genial gentleman with a native dignity, un- mixed with hau/eiu; that rendered him a most agreeable companion, and the life of every circle to which he was warmly welcomed. In December, 1843, Mr. Douglas, for the first time, took his seat in Congress. His first speech was delivered on the nineteenth of the same month, on the improvement of Western lakes and rivers. He denied the right of the Fed- eral Government to prosecute a system of internal improve- ments in the states, though he maintained the Constitu- tionality and expediency of improving rivers, harbors, and navigable waters, and advocated a scheme of tonnage duties for that purpose, to be levied and expended by the local authorities. He was also mainly instrumental in securing the passage of the law by which the maritime and admiralty jurisdiction of the Federal Courts was extended over the great chain of Northern lakes, having reported the bill as a member of the Judiciary Committee, and put it upon its passage, when a member of the House of Representatives. On the 7th of January, 18-i-i, he delivered his great and eloquent speech on the bill to refund to General Jackson the fine unjustly imposed by Judge Hall, of New Orleans. It is replete with eloquent passages, and is a complete and triumphant vindication. The Ofd Hero, himself, said of it: "Mr. Douglas, I read, with feelings of lively gratitude, your speech in Congress last winter, in favor of remitting the fine imposed on me by Judge Hall. I knew when I proclaimed and enforced mar- LIFE OF STEFHEN A. DOUGLAS. 91 lial law, that I was doing right. But never, until I had read your speech, could I have expressed the reasons which actuated my con- duct. I knew that I was violating the Constitution of my country. When my life is written, I wish that speech of yours to be inserted in it, as m^' reasons for proclaiming and enforcing martial law in New Orleans." Could a more brilliant compliiuent, or one more penetrat- ing, be found than this, addressed in a voice tremulous with emotion, by the venerable patriot and sage of the Hermitage, to the youthful statesman. CIIAPTF.Il III. Mr. Douglas was among the earliest advocates of the annexation of Texas, on which he made a most able speech, January Gth, 18i5. After enumerating the advantages of annexation, he proceeded to show that it must bo done in accordance witii the principles of the Constitution, prov- ing the doctrine to have been sanctioned and settled, that foreign territory may be annexed, organized into territories and states, and admitted into the Union on an eijual foot- ing with the original states. The following are his con- cluding remarks: "The conclusion is irresistible tliat Congress, possessing the power to admit a .state, has the riglit to pass a law of annexation. I do not say that territory can not be !\C(iuired in any other way than by act of Congress. ^Ve may acnuire it by conquest, or bj' treaty, or by discovery. Wo claim Oicgon Territory by virtue of the right of discovery and occupation. IJiit if wc wish to acquire Texas without making war or relying ujion discovery, we musi fall back upon the power to admit new states, and acquire the tcniiory by act of Con- gress, as one of the necessary and iadispcnsal)Io means of executing that cnumcrat»;d power. Our Federal system is admirably adapted to the whole continent ; and while I would not violate the laws of nations, nor treaty stipulations, nor in any manner tarnish the national honor, 1 would exert all legal and honorable means to drive Great Urilain and the last vestiges of royal authority fnuu the conti- nent of North America, and extend the limits of the republic from ocean to ocean. I would make this an ocean-bound republic, and have no more disputes about boundaries or red lines upon maps." The treaty for annexation having failed in the Senate, 92 LIFE OP STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. Mr. Douglas, among others, introduced joint resolutions in the House of Representatives for that object, and at the next session, as Chairman of the Committee on Territories, he reported the joint resolution by which Texas was de- clared one of the States of the Union, on an equal footincr with the original states. Mr. Douglas vigorously sustained the Administration of President Polk in the measures which it adopted for the prosecution of the war with Mexico, which was the ultimate consequence of that act. As Chairman of the Territorial Committee, first in the House of Representatives, and afterward in the Senate, he reported and successfully car- ried through, the bills to organize the Territories of Minne- sota, Oregon, i^ew Mexico, Utah, Washington, Kansas, and Nebraska, and also the bills for admission into the Union of the States of Iowa, "Wisconsin, California, Minnesota and Oregon. So far as the question of slavery was involved in the organization of territories and the admission of now states, he early took the position that Congress should not interfere on one side or the other, but that the people of each territory and state should be allowed to form and reg- ulate their own domestic institutions to suit themselves. In accordance with this principle he opposed the " Wilmot Proviso," when first passed in the House of Representa- tives in 1847, as an amendment to the bill appropriating $3,000,000 to enable President Polk to make a treaty of peace with Mexico, and afterward, in the Senate, when of- fered as an amendment to the bill for the organization of the Territory of Oregon. In August, 1847, however, he oifered an amendment to the Oregon bill, extending the Missouri Compromise indefinitely westward to the Pacific Ocean, in the same sense and with the same understanding with which it was originally adopted in 1820, and extended through Texas in 1845, prohibiting slavery in all the terri- tory north of the parallel of 30 deg. 30 min., and by impli- cation recognizing its existence south of that line. This amendment was adopted in the Senate by a decided major- ity, receiving the support of every Southern Senator, but was defeated in the House of Representatives by nearly a sectional vote. Mr. Douglas has been always a strict supporter of the " Monroe doctrine " — of the right and propriety of keep- ing the American continent free and exempt from any and LIFE OP STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 93 all settlement or colonization, under any pretense what- ever, by any European power. He voted uyainst the Clay- ton and Bulwer treaty, because it was a partnership with England in the affairs of Central America. He voted against the treaty with Mexico, because it contained an implied pledge not to annex any more territory of that re- public. He is opposed to making any bargain or contract about annexation of territory, because he wishes the United States to be left free and untrammeled, to act as their best interest may require whenever the occasion arises. If it be deemed necessary at any time to acquire Cuba, he is for having the action of the United States prompt and decisive, and not clogged by any treaty stipulations with European powers, who, by right, have no concern in the affairs of the American continent. He differs from many on the question of fillibusterism. He denies the power of the United States to follow Amer- ican citizens to other lands and arrest them there, on a charge of a violation of the neutral laws; the power and authority of the United States extends only to the distance of one marine league from the coast, and once beyond that the expedition can not be arrested by the United States. He claims for General Walker, or any other American, the privilege of expatriating himself, and of going to other lands, and there taking himself a new allegiance. CUAl^rER IV. The following interesting political facts should not be overlooked by those who desire to know the true history of the great measures known as the Compromises of 1850. On the 25th of March, Mr. Douglas, from the Committee on Territories, reported to the Senate two bills — one for the admission of California as a state, the other for the estab- lishment of territorial governments in Utah and New Mex- ico, and I'or the adjustment of the Texas boundary. On the l!>th of April, on motion of General H. S. Foote, of Mississippi, a Committee of Thirteen was appointed, of which Henry Clay was made chairman, to which was re- ferred all the subjects pertaining to the question of slavery. 94 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. On the 8tli of May, Mr. Clay, from tlie CoTnuiittee of Thirteen, made an elaborate report, accompanied by a bill generally known as the "Omnibus bill." By reference to the original bill, as reported by Mr. Clay, and as it now appears on the files of the Senate, it will be seen that, instead of preparing a new bill, the Committee of Thir- teen took the two bills reported by Mr. Douglas on the 25th of March, and converted them into one, by putting wafer's between them — they had previously been printed by the Senate — making slight amendments, as Mr. Clay stated when he made his report, and erasing the printed words, "Mr. Douglas from the Committee on Territories," and inserting "Mr. Clay from the Select Committee of Thir- teen, appointed the 19th of xVpril, 1850," so that it read "3Ir. Clay from the Select Committee, etc., reported the following bill." The most important amendment proposed by the Com- mittee of Thirteen on the bills as reported by Mr. Douglas, is in the tenth section, where, after the words, -'that the legislative power of the territory shall extend to all right- ful subjects of legislation consistent with the Constitution of the United States, and the provisions of this act; but no law shall be passed interfering with the primary dis- posal of the soil," they itdded these words: "nor in respect to African slavery;" the effect of which was to confer upon the Territorial Legislature power over all rightful subjects of legislation, excepting ft/avr.ri/ ; whereas Mr. Douglas's bill conferred the same power on the Territorial Legislature without excepting slavery. As soon as this report from the Committee of Thirteen was made by Mr. Clay, it was assailed from the North and the South. Senator Jefferson Davis, of Mississippi, moved to amend, by adding a proviso that nothing contained in the bill should be construed to deprive the Territorial Legisla- ture of the power to pass laws for the protection of slave property in the territories, and made several speeches in favor of that provision. Mr. Chase, of Ohio, proposed an amendment, in effect declaring the bill should not be con- strued to authorize the Legislature to establish and main- tain slavery in the territories; whereupon Mr. Clay stated to the Senate that the amendment reported by the Com- mittee of Thirteen, excepting slavery from the action of the Territorial Legislature, was incorporated in the bill by LirE Of STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 95 the Committee in opposition to his vote and judgment. Mr. Douglas moved to strike out of the bill everything in regard to slavery, so as to restore it to the form in which he had originally reported it, conferring on the Territorial Legislature power over all rightful subjects of legislation, without excepting slavery. This motion was at first re- jected, together with the amendments of Mr. Davis and Mr. Chase. The discussion proceeded at great length, on the question whether the Territorial Legislature should have the same authority over the slavery question as on all other matters affecting the internal policy of the terri- tory, when, on the 31st of July, 3Ir. Norris of New Hamp- shire renewed the motion of 3Ir. Douglas, which was car- ried by a vote of 33 to 19; thus eduhlkhing as tlit: fiinda- inr.ntal. jn-inci'ple of the Cumprumise Pleasures of 1850, the doctrine that the Territorial Legislature was to have the same power over the question of slavery that it possessed on all other matters of domestic policy. Again the ultraists became very active, and those of the South appealed to the people of Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Houth Carolina, and other Southern States, to re- sist the action of Congress, because they had conferred upon the Territorial Legislature the right to [trohlhU as well as protect slavery, as it might please ; while those of the North appealed to the antislavcry feeling of their section to resist and repeal the san)e measures, on the ground that they conferred on the Territorial Legislature the right to introduce slavery into, ;is well us to exclude it, from tlie ter- ritories, as the people might choose. The refusal of the Senate to adopt the policy of Con- gressional prohibition of slavery in all the territories, and the rejection, in the House of lieprcsentatives, of the prop- osition to extend the 3Iissouri Compromise to the Pacific Ocean, gave rise to the sectional agitation of 1819-50, which was then temporarily quieted, by the legislation known as the Compromise measures, with zeal and Vigor ; and on his return to his home in Chicago, finding them assailed with great violence, he defeno complaint of the senator that the Ordinance of 1787 excluded the youth entirely from that vast fertile region between the Ohio and the ?\lississippi ? That Ordin.-ince was a dead letter. It did not make the country to which it applied free from slavery. The states foi'uied out of the leirifm-y northwest of the Ohio, did not become fi-ee by virtii^" of iho Oidinance, nor in conse- quence of it. Those stales became free by virtue of their own will, LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 97 recorded in the fundamental laws of their own making. In all republican states, laws and ordinances are mere nullities, unless sus- tained by the hearts and intellects of the people for whom they are made, and by wliom they are to be executed. "The Ordinance of 1787 did the South no harm and the North no good. Illinois, for instance, was a slave territory. Even in 1840, there were three hundred and thirty-one slaves in Illinois. How came these slaves in Illinois? They were taken there under the Ordi- nance and in defiance of it. The people of Illinois, while it was a territory, were mostly emigrants from the slaveholding states. But when their convention assembled at Kaskaskia, in 1818, to form the Constitution of the State of Illinois, although it was composed of slaveholders, yet they had become satisfied, from experience, that the climate and productions of Illinois were unfavorable to slave labor. They accordingly made provision for a gradual system of emancipa- tion, by which the state should become eventually free. These facts show that tlic (Ordinance had no practical effect upon slavery. Slavery existed under the Ordinance; and since the Ordinance has been suspended by the state governments, slavery has gradually dis- appeared under the operation of laws adopted and executed by the people themselves. A law passed by the national Legislature to oper- ate locally upon a people not represented, will always remain a dead letter, if it be in opposition to the wishes and interests of those who are to Ijc all'ectc-d by it. "lu regard to tlie effect of the Missouri Compromise on the ques- tion of slavery, I do not think that it had any practical effect on that question, one way or another; it neither curtailed nor extended slavery one incii." Mr. ])ouj;las was an unsuccessful candidate before the Deuiooratic National Convention, in Baltimore, in 1852, for the nomination for the Presidency. On one of nine ballots he received 02 votes, the highest number given to any candidate for that ballot, out of a total of 2S8 votes. At the Congressional session of 1853-4 he reported, from the Committee on Territories, the celebrated bill to organize the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska, which effectually revolutionized political parties in the United States, and formed tlie issues upon which the Democratic and llepub- lican parties became arrayed against each other. Tiie passage of this bill caused great excitement in the free states of the Union ; and Mr. Douglas, as its author, was widely and vehemently denounced, and, in many places, was hanged and burned in efBgy. The whole controversy turned on the provision repealing the Missouri Compro- mise, which Mr. Douglas maintained to be inconsistent ^ith the principles of non-intervention, by Congress, with 9 98 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. D0UC4LAS. slavery in tlie states and territories. After repealing the Missouri restriction, the bill declared it to be the " true intent and meaning of the act, not to legislate slavery into any state or territory, nor to exclude it therefrom ; but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States." Whatever diversity of opinion may exist in regard to the correctness of this principle, and the propriety of its application to the terri- tories, it must be admitted that Mr. Douglas has proved J'aithful to it, under all circumstances, and defended it whenever assailed or violated. He carried his measure through Congress, in the face of an opposition more fierce and determined than was ever before arrayed against any measure. He was assailed, throughout the North, by every description of indignity. When he reached home, on the 25th of August, he found that measure in even worse favor, and himself threatened with personal violence, notwithstanding which he announced his intention to defend it. At the meeting he was met l)y an armed mob, who, fearing the power of argument, refused to let him be heard. For three hours he stood up before that mob, and defended the South and her states- men ; defended the President; and defended the repeal of the Missouri restriction. But little that he said was allowed to be heard. He was groaned at and hissed, and, by all the means that a mob can find to insult the object of its hatred, he was insulted and assailed. He was not con- quered, though he was denied the privilege of being heard. An amusing incident that occurred at the time of this mob ought not to be omitted. When Mr. Douglas appeared upon the stand, he was greeted by the mob that had been organized, with their leaders, ready for violence, and ten thousand strong, with the most unearthly howls. When he commenced to speak, they threw eggs, stones, and clubs, and fired pistols, to create a tumult, and break up the meeting. He maintained his position for four hours ; sometimes appealing to them; then ridiculing; then de- nouncing their cowardice, in combining to put down, with violence and force, a single man, who used no other wea- pons than truth and reason. His efforts were futile. The mob grew supreme; and, having held them at bay, fron\ eight o'clock in the evening of Saturday till past twelve, -J LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 99 in the midst of their imprecations and violence he delib- erately took out his watch, and looking at it, said to the crowd : " It is Sunday morning ; I have to go to church, and you may go to h-11.'' lie then retired, pursued by the mob, to his hotel. In spite of all these demonstrations ; in spite of a thor- ough union of the Know-Nothings and Republicans, Illi- nois, in 1854, elected a Democratic state-ticket and her five Democratic members of Congress. Mr. Douglas immediately issued notices, making appoint- ments throughout the State. He appealed to the people to rally in defense of the great principle that every commu- nity should govern itself, in respect to its local and do- mestic afl'aii's. He did not appeal in vain ; the people of Illinois did rally, and, in the I'residcntial election of 185G, gave Mr. Buchanan a Democratic majority on that distinct issue. CHAPTER VI. In 1850, Mr. Douglas was again a candidate for the Presidential nomination before the Democratic National Convention at Cincinnati. The higliest vote he received was on the sixteenth ballot, which stood for Mr. Buchanan 108, for Mr. Douglas 121, for Mr. Cass 0. In the Con- gressional session of 1857-8, he denounced and opposed with energy and ability the Lecompton Constitution, upon the distinct ground that it was not the act and deed of the people of Kansas, and did not embody their will. Before the adjournment of that session of Congress, he returned home to vindicate his action before the people of Illinois, in one of the most excited and well-contested po- litical canvasses ever known in the United States. He had to encounter the determined hostility of the Federal Admin- i.stration and all its patronage, and the powerful opposition of the Ivcpublican party. But he succeeded in carrying the election of a sufficient number of State senators and representatives to secure his return to the United States Senate for six years, from March 4, 1859, by lifty-four votes for him, to forty-six for Abraham Lincoln, his able and dis- tinguished opponent. During the whole of that contest, he 100 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. maintained and defended the doctrine of non-intervention and popular sovereignty, in the same sense in which he previously proclaimed it in Congress. Subsequently, in a debate in the Senate, (February 23d, 1858,) he avowed and defended the same doctrine when assailed by several of the Democratic party. Mr. Douglas has been remarkably successful in promot- ing the local interests of his own state during his Con- gressional career. To him, more than to any other indi- vidual, is Illinois indebted for the magnificent grant of lauds which secured the construction of the Illinois Cen- tral Railroad, and contributed so much to restore the credit and develop the resources of the State. lie has always been a warm supporter and advocate of a railroad from the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean, having been a member of the various Committees of Congress on that subject, and being the author of several bills reported by those committees. Mr. Douglas's views in regard to our foreign relations, have seldom been in accordance with the policy of the Ad- ministration. He opposed the treaty with England, limit- ing the Oregon territory to the forty-ninth parallel, con- tending that England had no right on that coast, and that the United States shonld never recognize the claim. He opposed the treaty of peace with Mexico, on the ground that the boundaries were unnatural and inconvenient, and that the provisions in regard to the Indians could never be executed. The United States have since paid Mexico $10,000,000 to change the boundaries, and relinquish the stipulations in regard to the Indians. He opposed the ratification of the Clayton and Bulwer treaty, and endeav- ored to procure its rejection, upon the ground, among other things, that it pledged the faith of the United States in all time to come, never to annex, colonize, or exercise dominion over any portion of Central America. He de- clared that he did not desire to annex that country at that time, but maintained that the Isthmus routes must be kept open as highways to the American possessions on the Pa- cific ; that the time would come when the United States would be compelled to occupy Central America, and that he would never pledge the faith of the Republic not to do in the future, in respect to this continent, what its inter- ests and safety might require. He also declared himself 3HJ LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 101 in favor of the acquisition of Cuba, whenever the island can be obtained consistently with the laws of nations and tbc honor of the United States. Judge Douglas's senatorial career has been one of the most remarkable of any statesmen, living or dead. It h;is been distinguished for great originality, consummate abil- ity, saund logic, and the purest patriotism. As chairman of the Committee on Territories, he developed resources of intellect and profundity of judgment that have ranked him foremost among the greatest expounders of the Con- stitution the country has ever possessed. In every situa- tion in which he has been placed he has revealed com- manding talents, and in his personal history and success, he is the best embodiment of the character of our insti- tutions among all our statesmen living. It was this peculiarity that so charmed the Emperor Nicholas, when Judge Douglas visited his Imperial Majesty at St. Petersburg, on his tour through Europe, six years ago, and it is this which makes him the most popular man of his time. Fathers may point their sons with pride to him as a liv- ing example of the results of early application, diligence, industry, and perseverance. A poor boy, without friends or means, in a then unsettled and semi-barbarous state, by the force of his own inherent powers, he worked his way up to the highest places, and distinguished each by the ability he brought to bear in the performance of duty. At this time there is no man in the Union more uni- versally esteemed. He is the idol of the people, and the choice of nine-tenths of his parXy for the Presidency. But he has been most bitterly pursued by members of his own party. Judge Douglas was first married on the 7th of April, 1847, to Martha Denny Martin, only daughter of Colonel Robert Martin, of Rockingham county, North Carolina. After a happy life of nearly six years, with a husband whose interest was the object of her worldly life, she died at his residence in Washington, on the 19th of January, 1853, leaving three children, two boys and one girl, the latter an infant, who survived its mother but a few months. The two boys are now bright, active, and intelligent youths, and reside with their father. On November 2Uth, 1856, Mr. Douglas was married, at 102 LIFE OP STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. Washington, to Miss Aclela Cutts, the beautiful and accom- plished daughter of Hon. James Madison Cutts, long a resident of that city. This marriage was blessed with a lovely daughter, but Ileavon called the blessing away : "A rose Willi all its brigliLest leaves yet folded." CHAPTER Vll. Ip the task were difficult to compress within restricted limits the principal events of other distinguished citizens, whose lives are here recorded, how much less possible of accomplishment to do anything lilie justice to the brilliant statesmanship of one who has been an acknowledged leader of his party and director of its movements, as well as de- fender in times of peril ^nd hours of darkness ; and who, again, meeting the inevitable vicissitudes of elevated station and genius, has been pursued with unrelenting vindictive- ness and fury, to which the fable of Acteon being devoured by his own pack might be considered a fair parallel. No man in this llepublic has more honorably entitled himself to a foremost rank in the nation than Stephen A. Douglas. ^Vithout family or ibrtune, without any of those adventi- tious aids by which men are elevated, like Saul, ahead and shoulders above their fellow-men, he rose from obscurity by his native energy, and a breadth and depth of genius rarely accorded. This sketch, imperfect as it is, would be still more so if the following cordial, frank, manly expression from the full-hearted senator from Kentucky wore omitted. It may be pointed to in answer to the abuse and slander and dispar- agement of those who most unnaturally and assassin-like would stab to death Senator Douglas's reputation. Mr. Dixon was a faithful and steadfast friend of Mr. Clay to the last. If he idolized man it was Mr.' Clay ; and if ever there were an honorable heart in man he wears it. Hear what he said, pending the great campaign for senator in Illinois, when the Administration sought to crush out the Tribune of the People, who could not be bought and who defied power : LIFE OP STEPHEN A. DOOOLAS. ■*► 103 "Of Judge Douglas, personally, I have a few words to utter which T could not withhold without frreatly wrongiug my own conscience. When I entered the United States Senate a few yeais since, I fouiiu him a decided favorite with the political party then dominant both in the Senate and the country. My mind had been greatly pruju- diced against liim, and I felt uo disposition whatever to sympathize, or cooperate with him. It .soon bcoinic apparent to me, as to others, that he was, upon (he whole, far tlie ablest Democratic member of the hod}-. In the progress of time my re:-pcct for him, both as a {gentleman and a statesman greatly increased. 1 found him sociable, affable, and in the highest degree entertaining and instructive in so- cial intercourse. His power, as a debater, seemed to me unequaled in the Senate. He was industrious, energetic, hold, and skillful in the management of the concerns of his party. He was the ac- knowledged leader of the Democratic parly in the Senate, and, to confess the truth, seemed to me to bear the honors wliich encircled liim with sufliciont meekness. Such v/as tlie palmy state of his rep- utation and popularity on the day that he reported to the Senate his celebrated Kansas and Nebraska bill. " On examining that bill, it struck me that it was deficient in one material respect; it did not in terms repeal the restrictive provision in regard to slavery embodied in the Missouri Compromise. This, to me, was a deficiency that I thought it imperiously necessary to supply- I accordingly offered an amendment to that effect. My amenduicnt seemed to take the Senate by surprise, and no one ap- peared more startled than Judge Douglas himself. He iraniediatuly came to my seat and courteously remonstrated against my aincijd- ment; suggesting that the bill which he had introduced was almost in the words of the territorial acts for the organization of Utah and New Mexico; that they lieing a part of the Compromise measures of 18o(), he had lioped that I, a known and zealous friend of the wise and patriotic adjustment which had then takeu place, would^iot be inclined to do anything to call that adjustment in question, or weaken it before the country. '•I replied that it was precisely because I had been, and was, a firm and zealous friend of the Compromise of 1850, that I felt bound to pci'sist in the movement which I had originated; that I was well satisfied that the Missouri restriction, if not expressly repealed, would continue to operate in the territory to which it had been ap- plied, thus negativing the great and salutary principle of non-inter- vention which constituted tlic most prominent and essential feature of the plan of settlement of 1850. \Ve talked for some time amica- bly, and separated. Somo days afterward Judge Douglas came l-o my lodgings, while I was confined by physical indisposition, and urged me to get up and t^ike a ride with him in his carriage. I ac- cepted his invitation, and rode out with him. During our short ex- cui'sion we talked ou the subject of my proposed amendment, and Judge Douglas, to my high gratification, proposed to me that I should allow him to take charge of the amendment and ingraft it on his ter- ritorial bill. I acceded to the proposition at once, whereupon a most iutorestiag iuterchanse occurred betv/ecn us. 104 LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOrOLAS. "On this occasion, Judge Douglas spoke to me, in substance, thus: 'I have become perfectly satisfied that it is my duty, as a fair- minded national statesman, to cooperate with yon, as pi'oposed, in securing the repeal of the Missouri Compromise restriction. It is due to the South, it is due to the Constitution, heretofore palpably infracted; it is due to that character for condstency -which I have heretofore labored to maintain. The repeal, if we can effect it, will produce much stir and commotion in the free states of the Union for a season. I shall be assailed by demagogues and fanatics there, without stint or moderation. Every opprobrious epithet will be ap- plied to me. I shall be probably hung in effigy in many places. It is more than probable that I may become permanently odious among those whose friendship and esteem I have heretofore possessed. This proceeding may pi'obably end my political career. But, acting under the sense of the duty which animates me, I am prepared to make the sacrifice. I will do it.' [How prophetic !] " He spoke in the most earnest and toucliing manner, and I con- fess that I was deeply affected. I said to him in reply: 'Sir, I once recognized you s'..^ a demagogue, a mere party matuiger, selfish and intriguing. I now find you a warm-hearted, sterling patriot. Go forward in the pathway of duty as you propose, and though all the world desert you, I never willJ "The subsequent course of this extraordinary personage is now before the country. His great speeches on this subject, in the Senate and elsewhere, have since been made. As a true natio-nal statesman — as an inflexible and untiring advocate and defender of the Constitution of his conntry — as an enlightened, fair-minded, and high-souled patriot, he has fearlessly battled for principle ; he has with singular consistency pur- sued the course which he promised to pursue when we talked together in Washington, neither turning to the right nor to the left. Though sometimes reviled and ridiculed by tliose most benefited by his la- bors, 'lie has never been heard to complain. Persecuted by the lead- ing men of the party he had so long served and sustained, he has demeaned himself, on all occasions, with moderation and dignity ; though he has been ever earnest in the performance of duty, ener- getic in combating and overcoming the obstacles whicli have so strongly beset his pathway, and always ready to meet and to over- throw such adversaries as have ventured to encounter him. lie has been faithful to his pledge ; he has been true to the South and to the I Union, and I intend to be faithful to my own pledge. I am sincerely grateful for his public services; I feel the highest admiration for all his noble qualities and high achievements, and I regard his reputa- tion as part of the moral treasures of the nation itself. "And now, in conclusion, permit me to say, that the Southern people can not enter into unholy alliance for the destruction of Judge Douglas, if they are true to themselves, for he has made more sacri- fices to sustain Southern institutions than any man now living. Southern men may, and doubtless have met the enemies of the South in the councils of the nation, and sustained, by their votes and their speeches, her inalienable rights under the Constitution of our com- mon country; Northern men may have voted that those rights should LIFE OP STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 105 not be ■wrcsLed from us ; but it has I'etnained for Judge Douglas alone, Nonlieiu man as lie is, to throw himself into the " deadly imminent breach," and like the steadfast and everlasting rock of the ocean, to withstand the fierce tide of fanaticism, and drive back those angry billows which threatened to ingulf liis country's happiness. ^ "I have the honor to be, very respectfully and cordially, your friend and fellow-citizen, Arcu. Dixox. " IIo.v. IIkxky S. Foote." CONCLUSION. TiiK Democratic party established the two-thirds rule in their National Convention in 1832. General Jackson was then the nominee of the people, without rep^ard to any Con- vention, lie refused to allow his name to be used in a Convention. IJut it was deemed advisable to nominate a candidate for Vice-President by the delegates of the peo- ple. Martin Van Buren had been rejected as Minister to England by a Whig Senate, and he was named for tlie second place on the Presidential ticket. The National Convention established the two-thirds rule, and under it nominated him. In 183(i he was nominated for President under the same rule. In 1840 he was re-nominated under that rule, and was defeated by General Harrison. In IS-tl, the rule was again re-established, and Van Buren, who had a majority of the votes of the Convention, was defeated by the rule, and President Polk was nominated. In 1848, General Cass was nominated under the rule, and in 1852, he was defeated by it, and General Pierce was nominated. In 185(), Mr. Buchanan was nominated under the rule. In ISGO, after the rule had been regularly adopted, and a por- tion of the Southern members having seceded from the Convention, it was still resolved to adhere to it — General Gushing having ruled that it required two-thirds of the whole number, and not two-thirds of those actually present, as had been decided by Andrew Stevenson, of Virginia, in a previous Convention, to secure a nomination. The Con- vention then, without making a nomination, adjourned to Baltimore, and there, on the second ballot, Mr. I)ougla.s received 181^ votes. It was at this time, on motion of Mr. Clark, of Missouri, that the vote in favor of his noia- 100 LIFE OF STEPHEN A DOUGLAS. ination was made unanimous — the body, at that time, con- taining 212 delegates — -and giving him a clear majority of all the votes in the Electoral College. The following is the correct vote on the second ballot : BEECKINRIDOE. GDTHRIE. DOUGLAS. Maine., ... ... 7 New Harapshii'e ... ... 5 Vermont ... ... 5 Massacliusetts ... ... 10 Rhode Island ... ... 4 Connecticut 2 . ... 3^ New York ... ... 35 New Jersey ... ... 2J Pennsylvania 10 2i 10 Maryland ... ... 2.} Virginia ... ... ■ 3 North Carolina ... ... 1 Alabama ... ... 9 Louisiana ... ... G Arkansas ... ... IJ- Missouri ... ... 4J Tennessee ... ... 3 Kentucky' ... li 3 Ohio .." 23 Indiana ... ... 13 Illinois ... 11 Michigan ... ... G Wisconsin ... ... 5 Iowa ... ... 4 Jlinnesota ... ... 4 Breckinridge, lO.V; Guthrie, 4; Douglas, ISl.}; whole vote given, 196. About twenty declined voting. Regular delegates wore present from G-eorgia, and their hearty sympathies were with Douglas, but a point of honor prevented them casting their votes. South Carolina, which chooses Presidential Electors (eight votes) by her Legisla- ture, and not by popular vote, sent no delegates to the Convention. The only other states not represented were : Florida, 3 votes; Mississippi,?; Texas, 4; California, 4; and Oregon, 3. Total electoral vote of states not present in the Convention, 29 votes ! The withdrawal of that portion of the delegates who wei'e unwilling to cooperate with the majority, and their resolving themselves into a separate Convention, was in- tended to defeat the effect of the nomination of Mr. Douglas, and is regarded by many as another step toward LIFE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. 107 the catastrophe which every patriot has so earnestly sought to avert — a dissolution of the Union of this great con- federacy. Upon being informed of his nomination, Mr. Douglas responded in the following letter, signifying his acceptance : "Washington', .June 27. "GEXTLE>rE.\: In accordance with the verbal assurance which I gave you wlien you placed in my hands the authentic evidence of my nomination for tlie Presidency by the National Convention of the Democratic party, I now send you my formal acceptance. " Upon a careful examination of the platform of principles adopte4l at Charleston and ruaffirmed at Baltimore, witli an additional reso- lution, which is in perfect harmony with the others, I fuid it to be a faithful embodiment of the time-honoreil principles of tlie Demo- cratic party, as the same was proclaimed and understood by all parties in the Presidential contests of 1818, '^)2, and '5G. Upon look- ing into the proceedings of the Convention also, I find that the nom- ination was made witli great unanimity, in tlie presence and with the concurrence of more than two-thirds of the whole number of dele- gates, and in exact accordance with the long-established usage of the parly. " My inllexible purpose not to be a candidate nor accept the nom- ination under any contingency except as the regular nominee of the National Democratic party, and in that case only upon condition that tlie usages as well as the principles of the party should be strioily a Fellow-Citizens : J "I was taken by surprise when I received a Iclefiraphic message in Baltimore, at three o'clock this day, that the Hon. Dcnjarain Fitzpat- rick had declined the nouiiuatiou tendered him by the Democratic (Jonvention, and that it was demanded of me to accept it. It is known to many of you tliat my name was freely mentioned in Balti- more in connection with this nomination, and that I persistently re- fused to gouutenance it, but invariably argued that if Georgia were to be thus honored, it was due to another of her sons most distin- guished for his talents and great public services. "This was my earnest desire, and the desire of the delegation of which I was a member. But the Convention in its wisdom deemed it best to nominate a statesman of Alabama. It was entirely satisfac- tory. Alabama is (he child of Georgia, and the mother cordially responds to any compliment bestowed upon her daughter. These are the circumstances under which I have been assigned this di-^tin- guished position, and which demand that discrimination should yield to the voice of duty. "The National IJomocratic partj' is in n peculiar condition. It is assailed in the house of its professed friends, and threatened with overthrow. The country is in a peculiar condition. It is on the eve of a sectional coullict, whicli may sweep down all political parties, and terminate in a dissolution of the Union. It is the duty of patriots and statesmen to unite in averting these threatened calam- ities. " It may not be inappropriate to refer to the circumstances which imperil the National Democracy. The Alabama delegation went to the Convention at Charleston, instructed to demand the incorporation into the platform of the parly the proposition that Congress should intervene for the protection of slavery in the territories, and to with- draw if the demand should be refused. It was refused, and I think properly refused. That delegation did retire, and with them a large portion of the delegation from the cotton slates. Why should tliey have retired? The record shows that if they had remained at their 112 LIFE OP HERSCHEL V. JOHNSON. post, they had the power to prevent the nominatiou of any candidate who might be obnoxious to the South. " Thus reduced by the secessions, tlie Convention adjouraed to Bal- timore, and requested the States to fill the vacancies in their respect- ive delegations. The Convention reassembled on the 18th. The seceding delegations were returned — some accredited to Richmond, and others to Baltimore, by the way of Richmond — instructed to make the same demand, and withdraw if it be refused. Delegates were appointed in Louisiana, Alabama, and Georgia, by the National Dem- ocrats of those states, to fill tlie vacant seats of tlio seceders. Those of Alabama and Louisiana were admitted, and the seceding dele- gales rejected, and. the seceding delegates from Georgia were admitted to seats, and they all took umbrage at the decisions of the Conven- tion, touching the various contests for seats. They retired, organized, and nominated candidates for the Presidency and Vice-Presidency. And they claim to be the National Democracy of the United States. "Now, if they were actuated by principle, if it was their purpose, in good faith, to obtain the recognition of the principle of Congressional protection for slavery in the territories, v.'hy not wait until a proper time to bring that subject before the Convention, and then, according to their instructions, withdraw from the body ? The reason is pal- piable; they were waging war against a distinguished man, not for the maintenance of principle. They were willing to jeopardize the integrity of the Democratic party, and tlie triumph of its cherished principles, rather than see its will proclaimed in the nomination of its favorite. Admitting for the sake of argument, Mr. Douglas to be as obnoxious as the.y allege he is, yet there never was a time when the South, united, could not liave defeated liis nomination. Why, then, should they have seceded ? Why not remain at tlieir post? AVhy seek to dismember and destroy the party? " I question not the patriotism of any, but the people will hold them responsible sooner or later for all the ills that may flow from their errors. I said the demand for CongressioTial intervention was propei'ly rejected at Charleston. And why do I say so? Because it was the agreement between the North and the South that the slavery agitation should be removed from tlie halls of Congress, and the people of the territories be left perfectly free to regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject to the Constitution of the United States. This was the principle of the Compromise measures of 1850, and practically applied to the Nebraska-Kansas act in 1854. It was adopted by the great political parties of the United States in 1852. It triumplicd in the election of Franklin Pierce in that year, and James Buchanan in 1856. It is perhaps the best ground of compromise between the North and the South which human ingenuity can devise. "It is understood by the people of all sections, and by it the Demo- cratic party, at least, of all sections should be willing to abide. It gives advantage to neither section over the other, because it refers all questions of dispute between them as to Congressional or territorial power over the subject of slavery to the final arbitrament of the Su- preme Court of the United States. It is, therefore, safe for the North, LIFE OF HERSCHEL V. JOHXSON. 113 and safe for the South. Its practical working is not without satis- factory results. Wliere the people of a territory desire slave labor, and the soil and climate are suited to it, slavery will go; where these conditions do not exist, it will not go. That finds an illustra- tion in New Mexico, where slavery is established, and this in tliose territories where it is excluded. Only a few days ago, propositions to repeal the slavery laws of New Mexico, on the one hand, and the antislavery laws of Kansas on the other, were made and re- jected in the Senate of the United States. " Suppose these propositions, or either of them, had prevailed, is it not certain that the country would have been thrown into the wildest excitement? But by their rejection, non-intervention was practi- cally adiiered to, and tiie public mind is satisfied and quiet. Let us maintain it firmly and faithfully. We are bound to it by every con- sideration of interest and obligation of compact. Its abandonment will prove fatal to the National Democratic party, and ultimately to the Union itself. It will drive the South into intense sectionalism, and the North into the ranks of the Clack Republicans. "I do not say every man of the North, for I know that the great body of the Northern Democracy will remain true to the Constitution, despite the overwhelming flood of its relentless cohorts. But I mean that the free-labor states would not be able to return a single mem- ber to eitlier house of Congress friendly to the Constitutional riglits of the South. "I trust that this condition of things may never exist; but if it should, I know of no way by which the Union can be saved. Hence, the doctrine of Congres.siunal intervention, as advocated by the new-born seciional pnrty, is fraught with peril to the country. " The nuesiion is now distinctly presented to the people, whether they will adhere to the doctrine of non-intervention, or whether they will abandon it; whether they will reopen the slavery agitation, by reijuiring Congress to take jurisdiction over it, or whether they will give repose to the public mind, and security to the Union, by leaving it where the Compromise leaves it — to the free action of the people of the territories, under the Constitution of the United States. The issue is fairly made up. It is intervention or nou-intervention. Its decision involves the destinies of this great Republic, and the highest interests of the civilized world. Compared with it, the as- piiations of men and the fate of political parties sink into utter insignificance. Where shall we look for deliverance from these threatened evils? ''It has been the mission of the Democratic party of the Union, in a thousand perils, to rescue our country from impending calami- ties. Its past career abounds with heroic passages, and is illus- trated with the most glorious achievements in the cause of Consti- tutional liberty. It is the party of Jefferson, and Madison, and Jackson, and Polk, whose administrations constitute grand epochs in our national historj-. It is the partj' of the Constitution. I look to it with confidence. Where else shall the patriot look in these times of political defection and sectional agitation ? Let its integrity be permanently destroyed, and the doctrine of non-intervention 10 _J 114 LIFE OF IIERSCIIEL V. JOHNSON. overtlirown, and then the best hopes of the statesman may well be clouded with gloom and darkness. " It is to maintain these, that I consent to take the position now assigned me, and welcome the consequences of personal good or personal ill which that position may bring. "Nothing else could induce rae to brave the detraction which it invites, and incur the heavy responsibility which it imposes. I have nothing to add but the expression of my profound thanks for the honor so unexpectedly conferred upon me, and my cordial acknowl- edgment for the flattering terms in which I liave been notified of my nomination. Whatever may be honorably done, I shall cheerfully do to maintain the integrity of the party and the triumph of its principles." LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. Up to the present period no man in the United States has had as successful a political career as Vice-President Breckinridge. At the age of thirty-fivo, he was chosen to the second office in the government, with the contingency of occupying the first. Ilis predecessors in office had attained a ripe age before invested with the honors which he so gracefully wears. John Adams was tifty-four; Jeffer- son, fifty-three; Aaron Burr, forty-four; George Clinton, sixty-five; Elbridge Gerry, sixty-nine; Daniel D. Tomp- kins, forty-three; John ('. Calhoun, forty-three; Martin Van Buren, fifty; Richard M. Johnson, fifty-seven; John Tyler, fifty-one; George M. Dallas, fifty-three; Millard Fillmore, forty -eight; William H. King, sixty-six. Jlis whole career has been eminently fortunate, and he might well adopt the terse language of Cassar, "I came, I saw, I conquered." Mr. Breckinridge was born at Lexington, Ky., January 16th, 1821, and is, consequently, now in his fortieth year. His grandfather was the distinguished dolin Breckinridge, who, as the friend of Thomas Jefferson, was intimately as- sociated with the celebrated Virginia and Kentucky reso- lutions of 17SS-9. His maternal graiullatlier was Samuel iStanhope Smith, President of Princeton College. His father, Joseph Cabell Breckinridge, was the eldest of five brothers, the youngest of whom, James, died before he arrived at man's estate. lie was an amiable gentleman, of cultivated taste and agreeable manners, but was not re- garded as extraordinarily gii'ted. The highest distinction he reached was an appointment of Secretary of State, a rather unimportant oliicc, under the administration of Gov- aio) IIG LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. ernor Adair. He died when his only son, Jolin 0., was a child, leaving a widow, who still survives, and three daugh- ters. John C. Breckinridge received the greater part of his education at Center College, Danville, Ky., of which his brother-in-law, Rev. Dr. John C. Young, was President, although he was for a short time at Princeton. He read law in Lexington, and at an early age was admitted to the bar. He took up his residence in Scott county, and rep- resented that county in the Legislature, as soon as he was Constitutionally eligible. Like many young men who strike out for a new field of labor and enterprise, he pushed his fortunes to the Northwest, and spent a couple of years at Burlington, Iowa, but the hx)Uie-feeling sat heavily upon him, and he returned to Lexington, where he has continued to reside ever since. During the Mexican war, Mr. Breckinridge received the appointment of jMajor of Infantry from Governor Owsley, under the second requisition for the service from Ken- tucky, and was the only Democratic appointment made by the Governor. He was on the line of duty between Vera (/ruz and the City of Mexico, but was in no engagement LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. 117 He tlistinp;uislied himself, however, as the counsel of Gen- eral Pillow, in the court-martial of that ofliicer. Returning home, it was made his melancholy though pleasing task to deliver an address at the capital, on the rc-interment of the hravc Kentuckians who fell at the battle of Buena Vista, whose remains were brought to the capital cemetery from their foreign graves. In 1851 he be- came a candidate for Congress, to which he was elected, and re-elected at the expiration of his first term. His oppo- nents were distinguished. gentlemen. General Leslie Combs and Ex-Governor llobert P. Letcher, and the district was supposed to be impregnable. lie canvassed it with his competitor on each occasion, most assiduously, and such was the impression made by his eloquence and genial man- ners, that he carried the people away with him, much to the astonishment and chagrin of the other party. The first distinction gained in Congress by the young Kentuckian, was a review of the Democratic Review, in Jlarch, 1.S5LJ, which, among other distinguished members of the Democratic party, had denounced General William 0. Butler, as an "old fogy." As Mr. Douglas was not assailed by the Review, -Mr. Rrockiuridge rather implied that it was his organ, to which 31r. Richardson, of Illinois, gave an emphaUc and positive denial; and 3Ir. E. C Marshall, of California, poignantly and ably defended the Review against the trenchant thrusts of his kinsman. On the oOth of June in the same year, Mr. Breckin- ridge introduced the resolutions in respect to the memory of Mr. Clay, who had died the day previous, and pro- nounced a glowing eulogy upon the great statesman. He said: "If 1 were to write his cpit;ipli, I would inscribe, as the highest eulogy, on the stone which shall mark liis resting-place : ■ " Here lies a man who was in the public service lor filty years, and never attempt- ed to deceive his countrymen.' " In the Thirty-second Congress, Mr. Breckinridge aided in securing an appropriation for the completion of a ceme- tery near the city of Mexico, in which the remains of the American officers and soldiers, who fell in battle, or died in or near the city, might be interred. lie also advocated an appropriation for a weekly mail to the Pacific, and urged that it should be let to the lowest bidder. 118 LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKINRIDQE. On tlie IGtli of March, 1852, Honorable Joshua R. Gid- dings, in a speech on the Compromise measures and Fugitive Slave Law, denied that the Federal Government had power to pass laws by which '' to compel our officers and people to seize and carry back fugitive slaves." Mr. Breckinridge pushed him into an enunciation of his extreme doctrines, and said: " Against the impotent raving of his bafSed fanaticism, I place the plain -words of the Constitution. To his coarse and offensive lan- guage I have no reply." During the discussion in relation to the Democratic Re- view, Hon. D. K. Cartter asked what he considered some impertinent question, when Mr, Breckinridge retorted, so as to turn the laugh against him : " I did not suppose the gentleman from Ohio would omit a favor- able opportunity to ring himself into the debate, and say something that might go upon the record." In March, 1854, Mr. Breckinridge, as a member of the Thirty-third Congress, participated in the discussion of the famous Nebraska bill. It was during this debate that the difficulty with Mr. Cutting, of New York, took place. On the 21st of March, Mr. Richardson, desiring to reach the Nebraska bill, which he had previously reported, moved the House to go into Committee of the Whole on the state of the. Union, which motion was lost, but the bill was at last reached by title in the regular routine of business. Every one felt as if a crisis had arrived. Mr. Richardson and Mr. Cutting rose together, the former moving to refer the bill to the Committee on Territories, while the latter wished it to go to the Committee of the Whole. Mr. Rich- ardson said his purpose was to amend the bill, and that Mr. Cutting's course would kill it. Mr. Cutting persisted in his motion, which he supported by a speech, disclaiming any disrespect to Mr. Richardson as chairman of the Com- mittee on Territories, and stating that the subject had been already discussed and elaborated by that committee. He was opposed to putting it again through the circuitous mode of referring it to them, and having it on the Speak- er's table as it was to-day. The North was in a state of LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. 119 civil insurrection since the introduction of the bill, and he thought it was a time, not for parliamentary tactics, which give rise to suspicion, but for full, frank, and manly dis- cussion. He was in vain appealed to, and would not with- draw, and his motion having carried, he clinched the vote, by moving to reconsider and then laying the motion on the table. Mr. Millson, of Virginia, having brought up the Ne- braska matter in a discussion on the Indian Appropria- tion bill, on the 23d of March, was followed by 3Ir. Hunt, of Louisiana, " two enemies of the bill," having precipi- tated the debate on the House. Mr. Breckinridge made some severe reflections on the course of Mr. Cutting. "The gentleman may be for the bill," said he, '-but his voice is that of an enemy." He warned the friends of the meas- ure from following the member from New York, whose course was calculated to kill it, and preferred to have a score of open enemies, to a professed friend, who struck in the manner he did. On the 27th 3Ir. Cutting replied at great length, and with severe causticity. A scene of excitement ensued. The difficulty was carried out of the House, and a duel was confidently anticipated, the prepar- atory steps for such an interview having been taken. On the 81st, however. Honorable William Preston informed the House that Mr, Cutting had left the matter in the hands of Colonel Monroe, of New York, and General Shields, United States senator from Hlinois; and Mr, Breckinridge had referred to Colonel Hawkins, of Ken- tucky and himself; and he was authorized to state that a settlement had been cfloctcd honorable and satisfactory to both parties. In behalf of both gentlemen, he apologized to the House for the infringement of the rules during the excitement of the debate. In his speech of the 23d, Mr, Breckinridge declared himself in favor of perfect non-intervention, and said he would not vote for the bill if it proposed to legislate slav- ery into Kansas and Nebraska, He said: "The riglit to establish involves the correlative right to prohibit; and denying both, I would vote for neither. I go further, and express the opinion that a clause Ufjislatinf/ slavery into those Tcrritorkt would not command one SoiUhern vote in this House." Alluding to the restriction of 1820, he said the effect of 120 LTPE OF JOHN 0. BUECKINRIDGE. the repeal of the former was " neither to establish nor TO exclude, but to leave the future condition of the territories dependent wholly upon the action OP THE inhabitants, SUBJECT ONLY TO SUCH LIMITATIONS AS THE Federal Constitution may impose." "Sir: I care notliing about refined distinctions or the subtiUies of verbal criticism. I repeat the broad and phiin proposition, that if Congress may intervene, on this subject, it may intervene on any other; and, having surrendered the principle and broken away from Con- stitutional limitations, you are driven into the very lap of arbitrary power. By this doctrine you may erect a despotism under the American system. The whole theory is a libel on our institutions. It carries us back to the abhorrent principles of British colonial authority, against which we made the issue of Independence. I have never acquiesced in this odious claim', and will not believe that it can abide the test of public scrutiny." Mr. Breckinridge was offered, by President Pierce, the mission to Spain ; but family matters induced him respect- fully to decline the honor. He was a delegate to the Cin- cinnati Convention, in June, ISS-G ; and after the nomina- tion of Mr. Buchanan, (he casting his vote for Mr. Douglas until his name was withdrawn,) his own name was pro- posed by General Lewis, of Louisiana, as a candidate for the Vice-Presidency. He gracefully appealed to have his name withdrawn. Mr. Smalley, of Vermont, thought that no Democrat had a right to refuse liis services at the call of his country. At the first ballot, Mr. Breckinridge had fifty-one votes; being second on the list — General Quitman being first, who had received fifty-nine votes. On the second ballot Mr. Breckinridge was nominated. The scene that ensued is thus described: "The names of otlier candidates were withdrawn, and the whole poll went for John C. Breckinridge; at which the Convention rose, and, with waving of handkerchiefs and the loudest vocal demon- strations, directed its attention upon tlie tall and graceful delegate from Kentucky, who had been so unexpectedly nominated for so exalted a post. It Avas long before the demonstration subsided so as to allow a word to be heard. At last the commanding figure of Mr. Breckinridge stood fronting the mighty throng. It certainly was a time to try a young man. He spoke bricHy and becomingly. The result just announced was unexpected, and his profound grati- tude was without words. He gave the Convention the simple thanks of a true heart; and expressing his appreciation of their LIFE OF 30UN C. BRECKINRIDGE. 121 first choice, and linkinj^ his humble name with that of the tried statesman of Pennsylvania, cordially indorsed the platform, and sat down, amid the booming of cannon, and the vociferous applause of tlie multitude outside, breaking iu upon and almost overpowering the loud cheers within the hall." Three days afterward he made a speech to his friends and ucighbors, at Lexington, in wliich he said: "The whole power of the Democratic organization is pledged to the following projiositious: That Congress shall not interpose upon this subject in (he states, in the territories, or iu tlie District of Columbia; (hat tJie people of each territory sliall dctorniino the questio«i for themselves and be admitted into the Union upon a footing of perfect equality with the original states, without dis- crimination on account of the allowance or prohibition of slavery.'' lie was elected Vice-President, having received one hun- dred and seventy-tliree Electoral votes, being a majority of fifty-nine over hi.s competitor, Honorable Wm. L. Day- ton. As President of the Senate, he took the chair early in the first session of the Thirty-Fifth Congress, December, " 1857; and, with some intermission, on account of sickness in his family, presided during that stormy session. • Mr. IJreckinridge made one of his finest and most effect- ive speeches at Florence, Kentucky, on the 24th of July, 1858, in which he reviewed the slavery question up to 1820, when intervention against the slave states commenced, fol- lowed by the \Vilmot proviso, lie showed how the slaverv (juestion had killed off the old Whig party, and how tlio American party had been unable to survive the same issue. The Democratic party, he contended, was entirely conserv- ative. It was based upon the Constitution and the right'^ of citizens and states. It alone had survived the ai>ita- tion, and was now vital and unconquerable. In the great struggle in lUinois between Senator Douglas and the l-fepublicans, aided and comforted by the friends and satellites of the Administration in that State, the sym- pathies of Mr. lireckinridge were with Mr. Douglas; and although he did not indorse the senator's course with re- gard to the Lecompton Constitution, in the session just closed, he desired his success, " being the leader of the Democracy of Illinois in their present fight against Black Kepublicanism." 11 122 LIFE OP JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. On the removal of the Senate from the old hall to the new one, Vice-President Breckinridge made a most feeling and eloquent address, which was greatly admired for its chaste and classic beauty, and teeming with historic recol- lections that render it most acceptable to the student of the past. During the last winter, the Kentucky Legislature elected Mr. Breckinridge to the United States Senate, in the place of Mr. Crittenden, whose term will expire on the 4th of March, 1861. The National Democratic Convention assembled at Bal- timore, on the 16th of June, in conformity to adjournment at Charleston; having failed to harmonize, a portion of the delegates withdrew, and uniting with those who were refused admittance to seats in the Convention, held a session at the Maryland Institute, where they nominated Mr. Breckin- ridge for the Presidency, and General Joseph Lane for the Vice-Presidency, upon a platform reflecting a south-side view of Democratic principles. Upon receipt of the intelligence, Mr. Breckinridge was serenaded at his residence in Washington, when, in response to repeated calls, he appeared and addressed his friends. He said he felt deeply this manifestation of friendly re- gard, and accepted it as an approval of the proceedings at Baltimore, by which the National Democratic Convention' presented his name and that of his gallant and honored friend, General Lane, as candidates for President and Vice- President of the United States. The heart would be cold and insensible, indeed, that did not throb with gratitude at such an exhibition of the confidence of his countrymen. He felt it, and felt it deeply, and did not affect to conceal it. lie had ,se(!n, with feelings of pain, the divisions and dis- turbances which occurred in the Democratic Convention, and had hoped to see in the end that these evils would be averted. His friends knew that he would not for an instant per- mit his name to stand in the way of fraternal harmony. He knew well that there were gentlemen of the North and South, of experience and ability, who were better fitted than himself for such a trust. But, without referring in detail to the proceedings at Baltimore, he would add that LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKIXBIDGE. 123 the Convention which assembled at Man/land Institute teas comjiosed, in his ojxinion^ of the KationnI Democracy of the United States. AVhen he learned, though with reajret, that his name had been presented to the country, he did not fake hnuj to de- termine thot he icould not inranhj ahnndnn them. lie under- stood that some persons occupyini^ hiijjh positions, enter- tained the belief that the Xational Democratic party is a disunion party, and intend to break up the union of these states. lie had read the resolutions adopted by that Con- vention with a great deal of care. There was nothing in the character of that Convention, or the gentlemen who composed it, or, if he might be allowed to add, in the character of the nominees, to justify it. Instend of breaking up the Union, we intend, he said, to strengthen and to lengthen it. One of the resolutions declared the equality of the states in all the common territories, under our common Constitu- tion. But no man is a disunionist who wants to preserve the Union on the great principle of the Constitution and the equality of the states. Another resolution, instead of breaking up the Union, seems to pledge, by the power of organization, to unite its difFercnt parts by iron liands. fie hoped this would be speedily and grandly realized. He saw nntliing sectional .there, from any of the states. Our pence has never been disturbed, except when these principles have been departed from. AVith regard to himself, when the Convention selected him as one of its candidates, looking at his humble ante- cedents and place of abode, it gave to the country a per- sonal and geographical guarantee that its interest was in the Union. He alluded to his distinguished associate, General Lane. It sometimes happened that men are placed in a position where they are reluctant to act and expose themselves to censure, if not to execration they do not merit. But we must be prepared for such occurrences in this life. All men can move forward with dignity and purpose, to pur- sue that course. He conceded to others the same good purpose he claimed for himself. Without acrimony and animositj', he accepted the nomina- tion tendered, him, and should quietly, firmly, and, he hoped bravely, accept the responsibility imposed upon him. He 124 LIFE OP JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. cherished the hope that Providence will lead us out of our civil disasters, and, in his good time, conduct us to tran- (£uillity and peace. "Democratic National ConvexTion, ■) Baltimore, Md., June 23, 1860. f "SiK: I am directed by vote of the Democratic Natioual Conven- tion, to inform you that you have been this day unanimously nomin- ated by it as the candidate of the Democratic party for the office of President of the United States, and, in their behalf, to request you to accept the nomination. I beg leave, at the same time, to inclose you a copy of the resolutions adopted by the Convention as the political platform on which the party stands. " I have the honor to be, vei-y respectfully, " C. CusHi.VG, President." " Washington City, .July 6, 1860. "Dear Sir : I have your letter of the 23d ultimo, by which I am officially informed of my nomination for the office of President of the United States by the Democratic National Convention lately assembled at Baltimore. "The circumstances of this nomination will justify me in refer- ring to its personal aspect. " I have not sought nor desired to be placed before the country for the office of President. AVheu my name was presented to the Con- vention at Charleston, it was witlidrawn by a friend, in obedience to my expressed wishes. My views had not changed when the Conven- tion reassembled at Baltimore, and when 1 heard of the diflferences which occurred there, my indisposition to be connected prominently with the canvass was confirmed and expressed to many friends. " Without discussing the occurrences which preceded the nomina- tions, and which arc, or soon will be, well understood by the country, I have only to say that I approved, as just and necessary to the pres- ervation of the national organization and the saci-ed right of rep- resentation, the action of the Convention over which you continued to preside; and thus approving it, and having resolved to sustain it, I feel that it docs not become me to select the position I shall occupy, nor to shrink from the responsibilities of the post to which I have been assigned. Accordingl.y, I accept the nomination from a sense of public duty, and, as I think, uninfluenced in any way by the al- lurements of ambition. "I avail myself of this occasion to saj', that the confidence in my personal and public character implied by the action of the Conven- tion, will always be gratefully remembered; and it is but just, also, to my own feelings to express my gratification at the association of my name with that of my fi-iend General Lane, a patriot and soldier, whose great services in the field and in council entitle him to the gratitude and confidence of his countrymen. " The resolutions adopted by the Convention have my cordial ap- proval. They are just to all parts of our Union, to all our citizens, LIFE OF JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. 125 native aud naturalized, and they form a noble policy for any admin- istration. "The questions touching the rights of persons and property, -H-hich have of late been much discussed, find in these a Constitutional solution. Our Union is a confederacy of equal sovereign stales, for the purposes enumerated in the Federal Constitutiou. Whatever tlio common government holds in trust for all the states, must be eujoyed eijually by each. It controls the territories in trust for all the states. Nothing less than sovereignty can destroy or impair the rights of persons or property. The territorial governments are subordinate and temporary, and not sovereign ; hence they can not destroy or impair tlie riglits of persons or property. While they continue to be territories, they arc under the control of Congress, but the Constitu- tion nowhere confers on any branch of the Federal Government the povfcr to discriminate against the rights of the suites or the property of their citizens in the territories. It follows that the citizens of all the states may enter the territories of the Union with their property, of whatever kind, and enjoy it during the territorial condition with- out let or hinderance, either by Congress or by subordinate territorial governments. " These principles How directly from the absence of sovereignty in the territorial governments, and from the equality of the states. Indeed, they are essential to that equality, which is, aud ever has been, the vital principle of our Constitutional Union. They have blitical party, with one wing of LIFE or JOHN C. BRECKINRIDGE. 127 which he is now identified, have been long- turned on Mr. Breckinridge as a future candidate for the Presidency, and doubtless he looked forward to tliat summit of ambitious hope, but at a more distant day than his friends have as- signed him, and to the attainment of which he might justly liavc supposed some other time might be more propitious. liut he (lid not feel at liberty to decline the nomination, and must now abide the consequences, which may or may not continue his life of prosperity, or end in his political demise. In either event, whatever may betide, the peace and happiness of the nation are involved in this contest, and are connected with his fate. LIFE OF GENERAL JOSEPH LANE. Joseph Lane, second son of John Lane and Elizabeth Street, was born in North Carolina, on the 14th of Decem- ber, 1801. When he was three yenrs old his father mi- grated to Kentuc-ky and settled in Henderson county. He was taught enrly to shift for himself, and had few advant- ages beyond the simple rudiments of edur-ation. In 181G, when but fifteen years old, he went to live in Warwick coxinty, Indiana, where he became clerk in a mercantile house, and when in his nineteenth year he married and settled on the banks of the Ohio river, in Vanderburg ! county, not far from Evansville. In 1822, then barely eligible, he was elected to the Indiana Legislature, repre- senting the counties of Vanderburg and Warwick. The 1 hospitality of his house is well remembered by river men especially, who many times shared it when their boats stranded on a bar near his residence. He was a river man himself, and for many years acted as a pilot on the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. For a period of twenty-four years ! he has served the people, in one or the other branch of the ' ' Legislature, being an active, vigilant, and intelligent mem- I ber, who was always governed by a sense of right and duty, 1 and who scorned to resort to the merely expedient. A large Democratic Convention assembled at Indianapo- j lis; at the time there were two vacancies on the bench of . I the Supreme Court of the State, the terms of Judges Dewy i and Sullivan having expired. Colonel Lane, although a warm and consistent Democrat, ffivored the renomination of the former judges, and was opposed to the attempt to j] bring the Judiciary within the influence of party. He Ij supported General Jackson in 1824, '28, and '32, and was ' ' an active and zealous friend of Mr. Van Buren in 183G and 1840, and in 1844 supported Mr. Polk. : ! (128) LIFE OF GENERAL JOSEPU LANE. 129 In the spring of 1S-4G the war with Mexico broke out, and a call being made upon Indiana for volunteers, Lane, then a member of the State Senate, resigned his seat and entered the company of Captain Walker as a private. r!K?»FR \r, .TdSKPH I. When tho regiment met at the place! of rcndezvoup. New Albany, .losoj)h Lane was taken from the ranks and ma