i 11 !lil!:K Yti'^il ill II jiiiji cj^|i'/iiii- f i m>>t!H ttlilt/lliU ' M' *ii , i' ni l i ; || ' ' ill' ■ i ' ■ ■ || I LIBRARY OF CONGRESS.} I — - I } JOLM ,1:1.5 \ I UNITED STATES OE AMKRIfiA. # UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. J 07- dr/middleton's / LETTER FBOM KOME, SHOWING AN EXACT CONFORMITY BETWEEN POPERY AND PAGANISM ; OR, THE RELIGION OF THE PRESENT ROMANS DERIVED FROM THAT OF THEIR HEATHEN ANCESTORS, THE AUTHOR'S DEFENCE AGAINST A ROMAN CATHOLIC OPPONEN' WITH AN INTRODUCTORY ESSAY AND NOTES, BY JOHN BOWLING, D. D. Author of "History of Romanism," &c. , &c NEW-YORK\0>^ PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN PROTESTANT 3 150 NASSAU STREET. c x. •V s Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1847, by Edward Vernon, in behalf of the American Protestant Society, in the Clerk's Office for the Southern District of New- York. ANALYTICAL INDEX. Page Introductory Essay by the Editor, . . . . v Dr. Middleton's Preface, xxxi LETTER FROM ROME. Chap. I. — First Impressions of Rome, and Motives of the Journey, ........ 33 Chap. II. — Incense, Holy Water, and Lighted Candles, . 43 Chap. III.— Votive Gifts, or Offerings, ... 52 Chap. IV. — Worship of Images, 59 Chap. V.— Road Gods and Saints, .... 76 Chap. VI.— Religious Processions, .... 82 Chap. VII.— False Miracles, 87 Chap. VIII. — Church Refuge— Orders of Priests and Friars, 102 Chap. IX. — Conclusion, 107 DEFENCE OF THE LETTER FROM ROME. § 1. Preliminary Remarks, 113 § 2. Origin of Popish Rites, 115 IV ANALYTICAL INDEX. Pa*e §3. Use of Incense, 117 § 4. Holy Water, 120 § 5. Lighted Candles, 123 § 6. Votive Offerings, 125 § 7. Image Worship, . 126 § 8. The Miraculous Picture of St. Mary, . . .135 § 9. Images not Defensible, 140 § 10, Fictitious Saints, 144 § 11. St. Thomas a Becket, 150 § 12. Transubstantiation, 152 § 13. Spurious Miracles, 155 § 14. Conclusion, 170 APPENDIX. A. — St. Januarius and the French General, . . 177 B. — Resemblance between Modern Paganism and Po- pery. By Rev. Eugenio Kincaid, .... 179 C. — Temporizing Policy of the Jesuit Missionaries in China, 1S4 D.— Sprinkling of Horses at Rome, . . 192 INTRODUCTORY ESSAY, In the remarkable conversation held by HIM. who spake as "never man spake," with the woman of Samaria, our blessed Lord uttered the following significant and memorable prediction : " Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. — But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spmrr and in truth." — John 4: 21, 23. As though he had said : < Vain are now the disputes between Samaritans and Jews, as to the contending claims of the temples of Gerizim or of Jerusalem ; the hour is speedily approaching when the peculiar worship of Jehovah shall no longer be confined to any special locality. The dispensation of Moses is soon to pass away, with its ceremonial observ- ances, its ritual sacrifices, and its temple worship. The shadow is to be superseded by the substance ; the type, by that which it was designed to repre- 1* VI INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. sent. — Hitherto, Samaritans and Jews have alike approached unto the Father amid the pomp of ex- ternal worship, with rites, ceremonies, and sacri- fices : in future, the true worshippers, no longer relying on outward ceremonies for acceptance, shall worship Him in spirit. Hitherto he has been approached, through the medium of types and shadows ; soon his servants shall worship him in truth ; — in the true way of direct approach to God, through Him who is the way, the truth, and the life.' In accordance with this prediction, we find that the worship of the early Christians was pre-emi- nently a spiritual worship. Whether we examine the inspired record of the Acts of the Apostles with their spiritual and instructive epistles, or the authentic ecclesiastical history of the first century of its existence, we find that Primitive Christianity was emphatically a religion of spirit, in distinction from a religion of form. Whether the early dis- ciples assembled for worship in private dwellings, in open fields, in desert places, or in " dens and caves of the earth," — as they were then compelled by persecution to do, — they met, not to renew the obsolete rites and sacrifices of Judaism, or to imitate the gorgeous and profane ceremonies of Paganism, but to " worship HIM who is a Spirit in spirit and in truth." When the great Apostle of the Gentiles preached the gospel and planted Christian churches in Rome, INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. Vll in Corinth, or in Ephesus, nothing could exhibit a more complete and striking contrast than that between the pure and spiritual worship which he established, and the pompous heathen ceremonies, in the same cities, of the priests of Jupiter, Venus, or Diana. They were as widely different as light from darkness ; as utterly opposed as Christ and Belial ; as far asunder as heaven and hell. To deepen our impression of this contrast, let us, in imagination, forgetful of the lapse of eighteen centuries, transport ourselves back to the days of the Caesars, and, in the city of Rome, enter yon Heathen temple, which lifts its stately dome to the clouds, high above all the surrounding edifices. Dedicated to all the gods, and therefore called the Pantheon, it stands pre-eminent among the four hun- dred Pagan temples of the proud capital of the ancient world. As we enter, the first objects which meet our eye are the statues of Jupiter, Neptune, Pluto and Apollo ; of Juno, Diana, Minerva and Venus; and a multitude of other images of heathen deities, demigods and heroes. — It is the hour of worship, on some grand national occasion. The Fontifex Maocimus, or chief priest, dressed in his flowing robe of ceremony, called the toga pratcxta, with the galerus, or cap made of the skin of a sac- rificed victim, on his head, marches in stately pro- cession over the marble pavement, attended by the college of pontifices, the augurs and haruspices, in their priestly vestments ; some of them with lighted Vlll INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. wax candles in their hands, others with their asper- gilla, or sprinkling-brushes, scattering holy water as they go ; while the air is filled with the odour of the incense arising from the smoking censers borne by the white-robed youths attendant upon the priests, who proceed, amid the admiring gaze of the multi- tude, to extend their victims upon the altars, and offer them in sacrifice to the consecrated images of Jupiter, Juno or Minerva. By the side of this heathen temple, and almost un- der the shadow of its walls, is a humble dwelling. As we enter, we behold a group of attentive and in- terested Christian worshippers. They are hanging upon the lips of one whose countenance betokens his descent, as a son of Abraham, while he preaches to them Jesus and the resurrection ; and then to- gether they unite in solemn prayer and praise to Father, Son, and Spirit. And who is this faithful herald of the Cross who thus dares, under the very shadow of the idol temples of Rome, to preach the gospel of the " crucified One," and to declare, " I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth "? It is the great Apostle to the Gentiles, who " for two whole years dwelt in his own hired house (in the city of Rome), preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ."— Acts 28 : 30, 81. The former is a picture of Pagan, the latter of primitive Christian worship. Is it possible to con- INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. IX ceive a more complete contrast, a more entire contrariety, than that between the one of these scenes and the other? The former, all pomp and pageantry and form and show, a company of Pagan worshippers, offering their idolatrous sacrifices to gods of marble or of brass ; — the latter, all sim- plicity, reverence, and spirituality ; a company of true worshippers, worshipping the Father in spirit and in truth. An equally vivid contrast might be drawn be- tween the simple and spiritual worship of the prim- itive disciples in Antioch, where they were first honored with the name of Christians, and the volup- tuous Pagan rites of the neighboring groves of Daphne ; or between that of the disciples of Corinth, who were " washed " and " sanctified " and "justi- fied," and the licentious yet superstitious devotees of the famed temple of Venus in that polluted city ; or that of the " faithful " Ephesians " accepted in the beloved," and those worshippers of a Pagan goddess, who filled the air with their frantic shouts, " Great is Diana of the Ephesians." In contemplating these entirely opposite charac- ters and modes of worship, we are irresistibly led to the conclusion that primitive Christianity and Paganism had no element in common, that fire and water might as readily have been brought to amal- gamate with each other, and the antipodes have been as easily united ; and the supposition that such a resemblance should at any time exist be- X INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. tween these two systems of worship, that the one might be mistaken for the other, appears like the very acme of absurdity and extravagance. Yet it is a fact too well established to admit of doubt or denial, that for twelve centuries* or up- wards, a system of religious worship has existed supported by a vast and powerful hierarchy, having its head-quarters in the city of Rome, called by the name of Christianity, but possessing the closest possible resemblance to Paganism. In the rank and orders of its priesthood, from the Pontifex Maxi- mus or Pope, downward, through every gradation, in its pompous and imposing ceremonies of worship, as well as in the images, whom it reverences or adores — almost identically the same. This resem- blance is so striking, as well as so extensive, as to force upon us the conviction that the elder is the parent of the younger ; and that not the spiritual religion of the despised Nazarene, that gospel which Paul preached, but Romish Paganism, such as it was in the days of Cicero, or of Virgil, is the source from which is derived, and the model upon which is framed the whole fabric of Romish Papal worship. The scholar, familiar as he is with the classic * The writer considers the epoch of the birth of Popery, properly speaking, to be A. D. 606, when the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome was finally established, by the decree of the tyrant and murderer Phocas, conferring upon that dignitary the title of Universal Bishop. For a particular account of this event, and of the principal actors therein, see Dowling's His- tory of Romanism, Book I., chapters 5, 6,— pp. 50-64. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XI descriptions of ancient mythology, when like the learned author of the " Letter from Rome " he be- comes an eye-witness to the ceremonies of Papal worship, cannot avoid recognizing their close re- semblance, if not their absolute identity. The temples of Jupiter, Diana, Venus, or Apollo ; their altars smoking with incense ; their boys in sacred habits, holding the incense box, and attending upon the priests ; their holy water at the entrance of the temples, with their asjpergilla or sprinkling brushes ; their thuribula, or vessels of incense ; their ever- burning lamps before the statues of their deities ; are irresistibly brought before his mind, whenever he visits a Roman Catholic place of worship, and witnesses precisely the same things. If a Roman scholar of the age of the Caesars, who, previous to his death, had formed some ac- quaintance with the religion of the despised Naza- rene, had in the seventh or eighth century arisen from his grave in the Campus Martius, and wan- dered into the spacious church of Constantine at Rome, which then stood on the spot now occupied by Saint Peter's ; if he had there witnessed these institutions of Paganism, which were then, and ever since have been, incorporated with the worship of Rome, would he not have come to the conclusion that he had found his way into some temple dedi- cated to Diana, Venus, or Apollo, rather than into a Christian place of worship, where the successors of Peter the fisherman, or Paul the tent-maker, had Xll INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. met for the worship of Jesus of Nazareth? It is impossible to conceive of a greater contrast than that which is presented between the plain and sim- ple rites of primitive apostolic Christian worship in the first century, and the pompous and imposing spectacle of Papal worship, in the seventh, per- formed in some stately cathedral, adorned with its altars, pictures, images, and burning wax-lights ; with all the array of holy water, smoking incense, tinkling bells, and priests and boys arrayed in gaudy-colored vestments, as they were seen in the time of Boniface, the first of the Popes, and as they are still seen, with but little change, after the lapse of a dozen centuries. With these incontestable facts before us, it be- comes an interesting subject of inquiry — How was this transformation effected ? Was • this change, from the simplicity and spirituality of primitive Christian worship, to the pomp and ceremony of Paganism, sudden, or gradual ? And after the transformation was complete, was the church of Rome to be regarded as a true church of Christ, or as a fulfillment of the predicted apostacy from the faith ?* To give a full answer to these inquiries, to state the proofs at length, that the church of Rome is not a church of Christ, but Antichrist, and to trace the gradual steps by which the ceremonies of Pagan * See 2 Thess. ii. 1-10 ; 1 Tim. iv. 1, 2, 3. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. Xlll worship were introduced into its ritual — would ex- tend the present remarks far beyond the appropriate limits of an introductory essay. We can only, therefore, briefly refer to the probable period of the commencement of this corruption of Christian wor- ship, and cite the concurring testimonies of two or three respectable authorities as to the reality of the corruption, and the causes that gave it birth. The practice of accommodating the forms of Chris- tian worship to the prejudices of heathen nations, was introduced in various places long before the establishment of the papal supremacy in 606 ; though, of course, as there was, previous to that date, no acknowledged earthly sovereign and head of the church, the observance of these heathen rites was not regarded as obligatory upon all, till enjoined by the newly established papal authority, in the seventh century. It is not unlikely that this policy, in its incipient stage, commenced by a mistaken, but well-intended desire of some good men, like the Apostle Paul, to " become all things to all men," that they might 11 by all means save some." Yet this apology can by no means be admitted as an excuse for the almost entire subversion of Christianity in the Romish communion by the adoption of these heathen rites, ceremonies, and superstitions. The ancient heathen nations had always been accustomed to a variety of imposing ceremonies in their religious services, hence they looked with con- 2 XIV INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. tempt upon the simplicity of Christian worship, des- titute as it was of these pompous and magnificent rites, and it was a step pregnant with disaster to the cause of genuine Christianity, when, as early as the third century, some advocated the necessity of admitting a portion of the ancient ceremonies to which the people had been accustomed, for the pur- pose of rendering Christian worship more striking and captivating to the outward senses. As a proof that Christianity began thus early to be corrupted, it is related in the life of Gregory, bishop of New Cesarea, surnamed Thaumaturgus, or Wonder- worker, that " when he perceived that the ignorant multitude persisted in their idolatry, on account of the pleasures and sensual gratifications which they enjoyed at the pagan festivals, he granted them a permission to indulge themselves in the like plea- sures, in celebrating the memory of the holy mar- tyrs, hoping, that, in process of time, they would return, of their own accord, to a more virtuous and regular course of life." " This addition of external rites," says Mosheim, " was also designed to remove the opprobrious ca- lumnies which the Jewish and Pagan priests cast upon the Christians, on account of the simplicity of their worship, esteeming them little better than atheists, because they had no temples, altars, victims, priests, nor any thing of that external pomp in which the vulgar are so prone to place the essence of religion. The rulers of the church adopted, INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XV therefore, certain external ceremonies, that thus they might captivate the senses of the vulgar, and be able to refute the reproaches of their adversaries, thus obscuring the native lustre of the gospel, in order to extend its influence, and making it lose, in point of real excellence, what it gained in point of popular esteem."* Subsequent to the conversion of Constantine in the fourth century, when Christianity was taken under the protection of the state, this sinful confor- mity to the practices of Paganism increased to such a degree, that the beauty and simplicity of Christian worship were almost entirely obscured, and by the time these corruptions were ripe for the establish- ment of the Popedom, Christianity — the Christianity of the state — to judge from the institutions of its public worship — seemed but little else than a system of Christianized Paganism. In his account of the fourth century, Mosheim remarks, that " the rites and institutions by which the Greeks, Romans, and other nations, had for- merly testified their religious veneration for ficti- tious deities were now adopted, with some slight alterations, by Christian bishops, and employed in the service of the true God. These fervent heralds of the gospel, whose zeal outran their candor and ingenuity, imagined that the nations would receive Christianity with more facility, when they saw the ♦Mosheim, Cent. II., Part 2, Chap. 4. XVI INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. rites and ceremonies to which they were accustomed, adopted in the church, and the same worship paid to Christ and his martyrs, which they had formerly offered to their idol deities. Hence it happened, that in these times, the religion of the Greeks and Romans differed very little, in its external appear- ance, from that of the Christians. They had both a most pompous and splendid ritual. Gorgeous robes, mitres, tiaras, wax tapers, crosiers, proces- sions, lustrations, images, gold and silver vases, and many such circumstances of pageantry, were equally to be seen in the heathen temples and the Christian churches." * A distinguished member of the establishment in Great Britain, Dean Waddington, confirms this testimony. " The copious transfusion of heathen ceremonies into Christian worship, which had taken place before the end of the fourth century," says Mr. W., " had, to a certain extent, paganized (if we may so express it) the outward form and aspect of religion, and these ceremonies became more general and more numerous, and, so far as the calamities of the times would permit, more splendid in the age which followed. To console the convert for the loss of his favorite festival, others of a different name, but similar description, were introduced ; and the simple and serious occupation of spiritual devotion was beginning to degenerate into a worship * Mosheim, Cent. IV., Part 2, Chap. 4. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XV11 of parade and demonstration, for a mere scene of riotous festivity.' 7 * The same testimony is given by the celebrated Archibald Bower, the historian of the popes, and a remarkable instance of this time-serving policy of conciliating heathen nations by adopting their pagan ceremonies, is related by him in his ac- count of the attempts of Gregory the Great to introduce the religion of Rome among our ances- tors in Great Britain. It was in the year 596 that Austin the monk, a missionary from Gregory, had landed upon the coast of Kent. The account which the learned historian gives of Gregory's instructions to the missionary monk relative to the policy he should observe towards the islanders, in his attempts to convert them to Christianity, is as follows. " Not satisfied," says Bower, " with directing Austin not to destroy, but to reserve for the worship of God, the profane places where the pagan Saxons had worshipped idols, Gregory would have him treat the more profane usages, rites, and ceremonies of the pagans in the same manner, that is, not to abol- ish, but to sanctify them, by changing the end for which they were instituted, and introduce them, thus sanctified, into the Christian worship. This he specifics in a particular ceremony. ' Whereas it is a custom,' says he, ' among the Saxons, to slay abundance of oxen, and sacrifice them to the devil, * Waddington's Hist. Oh., p. 118. 2* XV111 INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. you must not abolish that custom, but appoint a new festival to be kept, either on the day of the conse- cration of the churches, or of the birth-day of the saints whose relics are deposited there, and on these days the Saxons may be allowed to make arbors round the temples changed into churches, to kill their oxen, and to feast, as they did while they were still pagans, only they shall offer their thanks and praises, not to the devil, but to God.' This advice, absolutely irreconcilable with the purity of the gospel-worship, the pope founds on a pretended impossibility of weaning men at once from rites and ceremonies to which they have been long accustom- ed, and on the hopes of bringing the converts, in due time, by such an indulgence, to a better sense of their duty to God. Thus was the religion of the Saxons, our ancestors, so disfigured and corrupted with all the superstitions of Paganism, at its first being planted among them, that it scarce deserved the name of Christianity, but was rather a mixture of Christianity and Paganism, or Christianity and Paganism moulded, as it were, into a third reli- gion.' 5 * When pope Boniface, in the year 606, was in- vested, by the emperor Phocas, with supreme au- thority over all the churches of the empire, he not only adopted all the pagan ceremonies that had pre- viously, in various places, been incorporated into * Bower's Lives of the Popes. Gregory I. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XIX Christian worship, but speedily issued his sovereign decrees, enjoining uniformity of worship, and thus rendered these heathen rites binding upon all who were desirous of continuing in fellowship with the Romish church, or, as it was now called, the Holy Catholic church. Thus incorporated, they became a constituent element of the anti-Christian Apostasy, and have so continued from that time till the pres- ent. The process of change from the simplicity and spirituality of primitive Christian worship to the pomp, and form, and show of the paganized Chris- tianity of Rome was gradual, and commenced by slow and almost imperceptible steps ; and it is a fact from which the Protestant churches of the present day should learn a most important lesson, that the very earliest innovation, adopted from motives of worldly policy — the very first adoption of heathen rites, in order to remove the offence of the Cross, or to con- ciliate those who hated the religion of " the cruci- fied one, 55 because it was a spiritual religion — was the entering wedge which made way for that mass of Pagan rites and ceremonies, which were finally embodied in the worship of the apostate church of Rome. Not that we would imply, that, when the ear- liest innovations from the simplicity of Christian worship were adopted, the actors therein understood the danger connected with these first steps in er- ror ; or that they anticipated or even imagined that XX INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. they would ever grow into such a vast and hideous system of superstition as is that of the great papal Apostasy. The germs of many of the corruptions of Popery may be dated from a very early age, and were it not that the originators of those corruptions were entirely unsuspicious of the bitterness of those apples of Sodom, which should eventually spring from the seed by them sown, it would be diffi- cult to account for the fact, that so soon after the age of the apostles the seeds of many of these er- rors should have commenced to germinate. By these admissions, however, we are not to be understood as implying that the incipient corrup- tions in the Christian worship of the second or the third century bore any comparison in enormity to that gross system of superstition and idolatry which was subsequently established and perpetuated in Rome, under the abused name of Christianity, and which is so truthfully and graphically described by Dr. Middleton in the following work. No ! at the epoch of Constantine's conversion.* the Pantheon at Rome was still occupied by its an- cient gods, and Christians universally abominated, as " the accursed thing," the bowing down to idols of wood or of stone. The marble Jupiters of Ro- man mythology had not then transferred their honors to the Saint Peters of Roman, Christianity (?) nor had the statues of Pagan goddesses yielded their * A. D. 312. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XXI names and their honors to the Madonnas or the saints, at present adored under the figures of the same identical idols. The pretended wood of the true cross had not yet been dragged from its obscu- rity to be enshrined in a thousand places, as incen- tives to idolatry, nor had the fictitious bones of saints or of impostors been raked from their graves to be the instruments for fraud and "lying wonders," by a corrupt and apostate priesthood. For three centuries after the ascension of Christ, the wisest and the best of men united in condemn- ing even the least approach towards the worship of images. " It is an injury to God," says Justin Mar- tyr, in the second century, " to make an image of him in base wood or stone."* " We Christians," says Origen, in the third century, when writing against his infidel antagonist, " have nothing to do with images, on account of the second command- ment ; the first thing we teach those who come to us is, to despise idols and all images ; it being the peculiar character of the Christian religion to raise our minds above images, agreeably to the law which God himself has given to mankind. "f " God ought to be worshipped," says Augustine, in the fourth century, " without an image ; images serv- ing only to bring the Deity into contempt."^ The same bishop elsewhere asserts that " it would be * Justin's Apology, ii. page 44. t Origen against Cclsus, 1. v. 7. I Augustine de Civit Dei., 1. vii. c. 5. XX11 INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. impious in a Christian to set up a corporeal image of God in a church ; and that he would be thereby guilty of the sacrilege condemned by St. Paul, of turning the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man. 57 * The testimony of these fathers is merely cited as historical evidence as to the state of opinion on this subject in their day, not as matter of authority ; because were their testimony in favor of the prac- tice of this popish idolatry, as it is of some other early corruptions, still their authority would weigh nothing with genuine Protestants, in favor of a prac- tice so plainly opposed, as is the worship of images, to the letter and the spirit of the Bible. Some of the fathers, as Tertullian, Clemens Alex- andrinus, and Origen, carried their opposition to all sorts of images to such an extent, as to teach that the Scriptures forbid altogether the arts of statuary and painting.*)* Now while it is admitted that they were mistaken in this construction of the second commandment, — for we are only forbidden to make graven images for the purpose of bowing down to them and serving them (Exodus xx. 5), — yet the fact itself, of their expressing such an opinion, is the most conclusive proof possible, that they knew no- thing whatever of the image-worship which sprung * Augustine, de Fide, et Symb., c. vii. t See Bower's History of the Popes, vol. ii. page 34, Amer- ican edition, for several testimonies from Tertullian, Clemens, and Origen, on this point. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XX111 up a few centuries later, which was embodied and perpetuated in the apostate church of Rome, and which is so truthfully exposed and so deservedly re- buked in the work of Dr. Middleton. A singular proof of the abhorrence in which the worship of images was still held as late as towards the close of the fourth century, is furnished by a letter written by Epiphanius of Salamis to John of Jerusalem, about that time. " Having entered,'*' says he, "into a church in a village of Palestine, named Anablatha, I found there a veil which was suspend- ed at the door, and painted with a representation, whether of Jesus Christ or of some saint, for I do not recollect whose image it was, but seeing that in opposition to the authority of Scripture, there was a human image in the church of Jesus Christ, I tore it in pieces. "* In the fifth century the practice of ornamenting the churches with pictures had become very com- mon. At the close of the sixth century and the be- ginning of the seventh, Gregory unwisely granted the use of images " as helps to the memory, or as books to instruct those who could not read," though he strictly forbade the ivorship of them " in any man- ner whatsoever.'"')" Of course the distinction invented by modern popish idolaters, between sovereign or subordinate, absolute or relative, proper or impro- per worship — the worship of latria, dulia, or hyper - * Epiph. apud Hieron., torn. 2. Epist. 6. t Greg. Epist.— Lib. vii. Epist. 110. XXIV INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. diilla — of course, I say, these scholastic distinctions were not then invented, and were therefore unknown to Gregory. They never would have been thought of, but for the necessity which papists found of in- venting some way of warding off the charge of idol- atry, so frequently and so justly alleged against them. The words of Gregory, in his letter to Sere- nus, bishop of Marseilles, were, " adorari vero im- agines omnibus modis devita," which the Roman Catholic historian, Dupin, has translated, " that he must not allow images to be worshipped in any man- ner whatever ."* The precedent was, however, a dangerous one ; which Gregory thus established, by permitting the use of images in the churches. He might have an- ticipated that if suffered at all, they would not long continue to be regarded merely as books for the ig- norant ; especially when, as soon after happened in this dark age, the most ridiculous stories began to be circulated relative to the marvellous prodigies and miraculous cures effected by the presence or the contact of these wondrous blocks of wood and of stone. The result that might naturally have been antici- pated, came to pass. These images became idols ; the ignorant multitude reverently kissed them, and " bowed themselves down" before them ; and in a very few years a system of idol-worship had sprung up equally debasing with that which was witnessed by * Dupin's Eccles. Hist., vol. v. page 122. INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XXV Dr. Middleton, and which prevails at the present day in Italy and other popish countries of Europe. When this system of image-worship had become a part of the established religion of the apostate church of Rome, and was sanctioned and defended by her sovereign Pontiffs,* the step was an easy one to the adoption of many of the images of Pagan deities, found in the heathen temples of that city, to be the representatives of real or imaginary Chris- tian saints and martyrs ; and when this step had been taken, it is not surprising that most of the ceremo- nies, anciently performed in honor of these images, by the pontifices, augurs, and haruspices of Pagan Rome, should be perpetuated by the pontifices, the cardinals and the priests of nominally Christian Rome. Some, perhaps, may be disposed to think, with Bishop Warburton, that the idolatrous ceremonies and worship of the false church of Rome, are not to be traced to any Pagan originals from which they were copied, but that they are to be ascribed rather to " one common nature * * * debased by super- stition, and speaking to all its tribes of individuals ; n * In the year 713 pope Constantine issued an edict by which he pronounced those accursed, " who deny that veneration to the holy images which is appointed by the church,"— "Sanctis imaginibus verier ationem constitutam ab ecclcsia, qui ncgarcni Warn ipsam." The insane energy of the two immediate suc- cessors of Constantine, popes Gregory II. and Gregory III. in favor of image-worship is well known. For an account there- of, the Editor would refer the reader to his " History of Ro- manism," pp. 157-161. 3 XXVI INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. and that, notwithstanding their exact resemblance, " the same spirit of superstition, operating in equal circumstances, made both Papists and Pagans truly ORIGINALS."* It is true, indeed, as a learned prelate of the pres- ent day has most forcibly shown, that most of "the errors of Romanism " (and this among the rest) may be " traced to their origin in human nature ;"j" yet while it is admitted that the depraved nature of man, and its tendency to superstition, may account for the readiness with which the early corrupters of Christianity adopted these pagan ceremonies ; yet we believe there are but few careful readers of Dr. Middleton's work who will doubt that the ceremon- ies themselves, such as the offering of incense, use of holy water, burning candles in the day time, votive offerings, road-gods, &c, as well as in many instances the images themselves, were copied imme- diately from the pagan worship of ancient Rome. Even if there should be any who shall conclude, with Bishop Warburton, that both the idolatry of Popery, and the idolatry of Paganism are originals, and that the former is not therefore (as Dr. Middle- ton infers, and most readers will believe) a mere copy of the latter ; still, they will be compelled to admit with the Bishop, who says, when referring to * See Bishop Warburton's Divine Legation of Moses, vol. ii. page 355. t Allusion is here made to the valuable work of Dr. Whately, Archbishop of Dublin, entitled " The errors of Romanism traced to their origin in Human Nature." INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XXVll our author and other able writers upon the resem- blance of Paganism and Popery, that — " They have indeed shown an exact and surprising likeness in a great variety of instances."* As, therefore, the facts related by our author, and the close resemblance which he proves to exist between the two systems, are fully admitted by Bish- op Warburton, and the difference of opinion between him and our author is only in respect to the infer- ence Dr. Middleton draws from these facts (an in- ference from which, we think, few readers will dis- sent), this passing allusion to the criticism of the learned Bishop will be regarded as a sufficient no- tice thereof, without swelling the size of the volume by inserting entire the critique of the Bishop and the reply of our author. The education, learning and tastes of Dr. Middle- ton pre-eminently qualified him for the task he assumed, and which he has so well performed in the following work. That task was to describe the cer- emonies of the Christianized Paganism of Rome, as they fell under his own observation during a visit to that city in the year 1724, and, as the title intimates, to show the " exact conformity between Popery and Paganism," and to demonstrate that " the religion of the present Romans is derived from their heathen ancestors." Educated at Cambridge University for the min- istry of the Church of England, he was chosen in the * See Warburton's Divine Legation, ut sujrra. XXV111 INTRODUCTORY ESS year 1706, at the age of 23. a fellow of Trinity College, and a few years later, on account of his vast and varied learning, he was appointed princi- pal librarian of the University. Perfectly familiar with the whole range of ancient classic literature, he was prepared on his visit to Rome, at the ma- ture age of 41, at once to recall to mind the descrip- tions of the ceremonies of ancient Pagan worship scattered throughout the pages of the Greek and Latin historians and poets; and thus to le cognize at a glance, in the classic pictures of Homer or of Herodotus, of Virgil or of Livy, the originals of those parodies on ancient Paganism, presented in the nominally Christian worship of Rome. How well he improved these advantages, is manifest from his celebrated " Letter from Rome,'* which has now stood the test of upwards of a century, and : held in the highest estimation by the whole Protes- tant world, as a monument of his extraordinary learning, industry, and research. Soon after the appearance of the three first edi- tions of the work, which followed each other in rapid successi jn. it was attacked by a popish writer, in the preface to a work entitled " the Catholic Christian Instructed,*' and in reply to this attack, Dr. Middleton wrote the " Defence of his Letter from Rome/' which is printed (for the first time, we be- . in America) in connection with the present edition of his work. This defence is but little in- ferior in value, and not at all inferior in learning to !tV INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. XXIX the original work. In the edition from which we print, viz. that of London, 1755, the defence is pre- fixed to the work, under the title of " a Prefatory Discourse to the Letter from Rome." We have thought it more proper to insert it after the original work, where it appropriately belongs in the order of time, and to entitle it, as it in reality is, " a Defence of the Letter from Rome." Both the "Letter" of Dr. Middleton and the " Defence " thereof, were originally accompanied by a multitude of learned references and notes, in the Greek, Latin, French, and Italian languages. In many instances the very gist of the argument seemed to the present editor to depend upon the accuracy and the point of these quotations from classical and Romish authors. He has, therefore, deemed it expedient to insert the most important of these notes, omitting only such as appeared least necessary to establish the argument of Dr. Mid- dleton. To aid the unlearned reader, he has also given a translation of the quotations in foreign lan- guages, unless, as in many instances, a translation had already been embodied in the text. As the editor is responsible for such translations, in order to distinguish them, as well as a few additional notes, which he has appended, they are denoted by his initial [D.] The editor has also divided the i: Letter from Rome" into Chapters, and the "Defence" into Sections, with appropriate captions, and prefixed an 3* XXX INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. Analytical Index ; being satisfied, from former ex- perience, that such an arrangement constitutes a powerful aid to the memory, and much enhances the practical value of a work intended for popular perusal ; — to be read, studied, and remembered. The editor commends the present edition of the valuable work of Dr. Middleton to the American public, with the earnest hope that it may be owned of God as a means of arresting the progress, in this favored land, of a system of idolatrous super- stition, as contrary to the Scriptures as it is insult- ing to reason ; and of opening the eyes of every lover of his Bible and of his country, to the true char- acter of that anti-Christian and apostate church, which is straining every nerve to regain on this western continent, that despotic power and unbound- ed influence which it once exercised on the eastern. J. DOWLING. Berean Parsonage, New- York, March 1st, 1847 .1 DR. MIDDLETON'S PREFACE. The following reflections were the subject of sev- eral Letters written by me from Rome, to my friends in England ; and as the argument of them was much upon my thoughts, and always in my view, during my stay in Italy, so there hardly passed a day, that did not afford me fresh matter and proof for the confirmation of it, till my collections grew up to the size in which they now appear. Upon a review of them at my return, I found it necessary, for the sake of method and connection, to dispose them into one continued argument, and to collect into one view, under the form of a single letter, what had been more slightly and separately touched in several. Many writers, I know, have treated the same sub- ject before me ; some of which I have never seen ; but those, whom I have looked into, handle it in a manner so different from what I have pursued, that I am under no apprehension of being thought a plagiary, or to have undertaken a province already occupied. My observations are grounded on facts, XXX11 DR. MIDDLETON'S PREFACE. of which I have been an eye-witness myself, and which others perhaps had not the opportunity of examining personally, or considering so particularly as I have done ; and in my present representation of them I have not claimed the allowed privilege of a traveller, to be believed on my own word, but for each article charged on the Church of Rome, have generally produced such vouchers as they themselves will allow to be authentic. Much leisure, with an infirm state of health, was the cause of my journey to Italy; and on such an occasion, I thought it my duty, to use the opportu- nity given me by Providence, towards detecting and exposing, as far as I was able, the true spring and source of those impostures, which, under the name of religion, have been forged from time to time, for no other purpose than to oppress the liberty, and engross the property of mankind. But whatever be my opinion of the general scheme of that religion, yet, out of justice to the particular possessors of it, I think myself obliged to declare, that I found much candor, humanity, and politeness in all those, whom I had the honor to converse with ; and though my character and profession were well known at Rome, yet I received particular civilities from persons of the first distinction both in the Church and the Court. A LETTER FROM ROME, SHOWING THE EXACT CONFORMITY BETWEEN POPERY AND PAGANISM. CHAPTER I. FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF ROME, AND MOTIVES OF THE JOURNEY. Sir : I am sensible, that by this time you cannot but be desirous to have some account of the entertainment that I have met with in Rome ; for as you have often heard me declare a very high opinion of the pleasure which a curious man might reasonably expect to find in it, so you will be impatient to hear how far my expectation has been answered, and my curi- osity satisfied. You have observed, without doubt, from my former letters, that the pleasure of my travels seemed to grow upon me in pro- portion to the progress which I made on my journey, and to my approach towards Rome ; and that every place, which I had seen the last, still pleased me the most. This was certainly true in my road through Lyons, Turin, Genoa, 34 POPERY AND PAGANISM. Florence ; but is much more remarkably so with regard to Rome ; which, of all the places that I have yet seen, or ever shall see, is by far the most delightful; since all those very things, which had recommended any other place tome, and which I had been admiring before, single and dispersed, in the several cities through which 1 passed, may be seen in Rome, as it were, in one view, and not only in greater plenty, but in greater perfection. 1 have often been thinking, that this voyage to Italy might properly enough be compared to the common stages and journey of life. At our setting out through France, the pleasures that we find, like those of our youth, are of the gay fluttering kind, which grow by degrees, as we advance towards Italy, more solid, manly, and rational, but attain not their full perfection till we reach Rome, from which point we no sooner turn homewards, than they begin again gradu- ally to decline, and though sustained for a while in some degree of vigor, through the other stages and cities of Italy, yet dwindle at last into weari- ness and fatigue, and a desire to be at home ; where the traveller finishes his course, as the old man does his days, with the usual privilege of being tiresome to his friends, by a perpetual repetition of past adventures. But to return to my story. Rome is certainly of all cities in the world the most entertaining to strangers; for whether we consider it in its ancient or present, its civil or ecclesiastical state ; whether we admire the great perfection of arts FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF ROME. 35 in the noble remains of old Rome ; or the revival of the same arts in the beautiful ornaments of modern Rome; every one, of what genius or taste soever, will be sure to find something or other, that will deserve his attention, and en- gage his curiosity ; and even those who have no particular taste or regard at all for things cu- rious, but travel merely for the sake of fashion, and to waste time, will still spend that time with more satisfaction at Rome, than any where else ; from that easy manner in which they find them- selves accommodated with all the conveniences of life ; that general civility and respect to stran- gers; that quiet and security, which every man of prudence is sure to find in it. But one thing is certainly peculiar to this city ; that though travellers have generally been so copious in their descriptions of it, and there are published in all parts of Europe such volumi- nous collections of its curiosities, yet it is a sub- ject never to be exhausted ; since in the infinite variety of entertainment which it affords, every judicious observer will necessarily find some- thing or other that has either escaped the search- es of others, or that will at least afford matter for more particular and curious remarks, than a common traveller is capable of making, or a general collector has time to reflect on. The learned Montfaucon, speaking of the Villa of Prince Borghese, says, " though its antique mon- uments and rarities have been a hundred times described in print, that many more of them still have been overlooked and omitted, than are yet 36 POPERY AND PAGANISM. published." And if this be true of one single col- lection, what an idea must we have of the im- mense treasure of the same kind, which the whole city is able to furnish ? As for my own journey to this place, it was not, I own, any motive of devotion, which draws so many others hither, that occasioned it. My zeal was not bent on visiting the holy thresholds of the Apostles, or kissing the feet of their suc- cessor. I knew that their ecclesiastical anti- quities were mostly fabulous and legendary ; supported by fictions and impostures, too gross to employ the attention of a man of sense. For should we allow that St. Peter had been at Rome, (of which many learned men, however, have doubted,) yet they had not, I knew, any authentic monuments remaining of him ; any visible footsteps subsisting, to demonstrate his residence among them : and should we ask them for any evidence of this kind, they would refer us to the impression of his face on the wall of the dungeon, in which he was confined ; or to a fountain in the bottom of it, raised miraculously by him out of the rock, in order to baptize his fellow prisoners; or to the mark of our Sa- viours feet in a stone, on which he appeared to him, and stopped him, as he was flying out of the city from a persecution then raging ; in memory of which there was a church built on the spot, called St. Mary delle Piante, or of the marks of the feet ; which falling into decay was supplied by a chapel, at the expense of our Car- dinal Pole. But the stone itself, more valuable, MOTIVES OF THE JOURNEY. 37 as their writers say,* than any of the precious ones, being a perpetual monument and proof of the Christian religion, is preserved with all due reverence in St. Sebastian's church ; where I purchased a print of it, with several others of the same kind. Or they would appeal, perhaps, to the evi- dence of some miracle wrought at his execu- tion ; as they do in the case of St. Paul, in a church called "At the three Fountains," the place where he was beheaded ; on which occa- sion, it seems, " Instead of blood there issued only milk from his veins ; and his head, when separated from the body, having made three jumps upon the ground, raised at each place a spring of living water, which retains still, as they would persuade us, the plain taste of milk :" of all which facts we have an account in Baronius, Mabillon, and all their gravest authors,! and may * Lapis vero ille dignissimus et omni pretioso lapidi ante- ferendus, in D. Sebastiani ecclesiam translatus, ibidem, quo par est religionis cultu, in perenne Religionis Christianas monu- mentum asservatur. Aring. 1. iii. c. 21. That stone, most honored, and to be preferred to every pre- cious stone, was translated into the church of St. Sebastian, where it stands, with all suitable religious reverence, as a per- petual monument of the Christian religion.— [D.] t Cum sacrum caput obtruncaretur, non tarn fluenta san- guinis, quam candidissimi lactis rivuli, &c. It. In ipso autem Martyrii loco tres adhuc perexigui jugiter fontes, &c, horum primus cseteris dulcior saporem lactis prae se fert, &c. Aring. 1. iii. c. 2. It. vid. Baronii AnnaL A. D. 69. It. Mabill. Iter. Ital. p. 142. When the sacred head was cut off, not so much streams of blood, as rivulets of the whitest milk, &c. Also, — In the very place of the martyrdom, three small fountains, &c— the first of these, sweeter than the others, presents the taste of milk, &c. — [D.] "4 38 POPERY AND PAGANISM. see printed figures of them in the description ot modern Rome. It was no part of my design, to spend my time abroad, in attending to the ridiculous fictions of this kind. The chief pleasure which I proposed to myself was, to visit the genuine remains and venerable relics of pagan Rome ; the authentic monuments of antiquity, that demonstrate the certainty of those histories which are the enter- tainment as well as the instruction of our younger years ; and which, by the early preju- dice of being the first knowledge that we acquire, as well as the delight which they give, in de scribing the lives and manners of the greatest men who ever lived, gain sometimes so much upon our riper age as to exclude too often other more useful and necessary studies. I could not help flattering myself with the joy that I should have, in viewing the very place and scene of those important events, the knowledge and ex- plication of which have ever since been the chief employment of the learned and polite world ; iu treading that ground, where at every step we stumble on the ruins of some fabric described by the ancients, and cannot help setting a foot on the memorial of some celebrated action in which the great heroes of antiquity had been person- ally engaged. I amused myself with the thoughts of taking a turn in those very walks, where Cicero and his friends had held their phi- losophical disputations, or of standing on that very spot, where he had delivered some of his famous orations. MOTIVES OF THE JOURNEY. 39 Such fancies as these, with which I often en- tertained myself on my road to Rome, are not, I dare say, peculiar to myself, but common to all men of reading and education ; whose dreams upon a voyage to Italy, like the descriptions of theElysian fields, represent nothing to their fan- cies but the pleasure of finding out and convers- ing with those ancient sages and heroes whose characters they have most admired. Nor in- deed is this imagination much disappointed in the event ; for, as Cicero observes, " Whether it be from nature, or some weakness in us, it is certain that we are much more affected with the sight of those places, where great and famous men have spent most part of their lives, than either to hear of their actions, or read their works;"* and he was not, as he tells us, "so much pleased with Athens itself, for its stately build- ings or exquisite pieces of art, as in recollecting the great men whom it had bred ; in carefully visiting their sepulchres ; and finding out the place where each had lived, or walked, or held his disputations."! This is what every man of curiosity will, in the like circumstances, find true in himself ; and for my own part, as oft as 1 have been rambling about in the very rostra of old Rome, or in that temple of Concord, where Tully assembled the senate in Catiline's conspi- racy, I could not help fancying myself much more sensible of the force of his eloquence; whilst the impression of the place served to * Cicero de Fin. v. t Cic. de Legibus. ii. 2. 10 POPERY AND PAGANISM. warm my imagination to a degree almost equal to that of his old audience. As therefore my general studies had furnished me with a competent knowledge of Roman his- tory, as well as an inclination to search more particularly into some branches of its antiquities, so I had resolved to employ myself chiefly in inquiries of this sort ; and to lose as little time as possible in taking notice of the fopperies and ri- diculous ceremonies of the present religion of the place. But I soon found myself mistaken ; for the whole form and outward dress of their worship seemed so grossly idolatrous and ex- travagant, beyond what I had imagined, and made so strong an impression on me, Fhat I could not help considering it with a particular regard ; especially when the very reason which I thought would have hindered me from taking any notice of it at all, was the chief cause that engaged me to pay so much attention to it : for nothing, I found, concurred so much with my original in- tention of conversing with the ancients, or so much helped my imagination to fancy myself wandering about in old heathen Rome, as to observe and attend to their religious worship, all whose ceremonies appeared plainly to have been copied from the rituals of primitive Pagan- ism, as if handed down by an uninterrupted succession from the priests of old, to the priests of new Rome ; whilst each of them readily ex- plained and called to my mind some passage of a classic author, where the same ceremony was described as transacted in the same form and MOTIVES OF THE JOURNEY. 41 manner, and in the same place, where I now saw it executed before my eyes ; so that as oft as I was present at any religious exercise in their churches, it was more natural to fancy myself looking on at some solemn act of idolatry in old Rome, than assisting at a worship, instituted on the principles, and formed upon the plan of Christianity. Many of our divines have, I know, with much learning, and solid reasoning, charged and ef- fectually proved the crime of idolatry on the church of Rome ; but these controversies (in which there is still something plausible to be said on the other side, and where the charge is constantly denied, and with much subtlety evaded) are not capable of giving that convic- tion, which I immediately received from my senses ; the surest witnesses of fact in all cases ; and which no man can fail to be furnished with, who sees Popery, as it is exercised in Italy, in the full pomp and display of its pageantry, and practising all its arts and powers without caution or reserve. This similitude of the popish and pagan religion seemed so evident and clear, and struck my imagination so forcibly, that I soon resolved to give myself the trouble of searching to the bottom, and to explain and de- monstrate the certainty of it, by comparing to- gether the principal and most obvious parts of each worship; which, as it was my first em- ployment after I came to Rome, shall be the sub- ject of my first letter. Reserving therefore to my next, the account that I design to give you 4* 42 POPERY AND PAGANISM. of the antiquities and other curiosities of the place, I shall find matter enough for this time to tire both you and myself, in showing the source and origin of the popish ceremonies, and the exact conformity of them with those of their pagan ancestors. CHAPTER II. INCENSE, HOLY WATER, AND LIGHTED CANDLES. The very first thing that a stranger must ne- cessarily take notice of, as soon as he enters their churches, is the use of incense or perfumes in their religious offices. The first step which he takes within the door, will be sure to make him sensible of it, by the offence that he will imme- diately receive from the smell, as well as smoke of this incense, with which the whole church continues filled for some time after every solemn service ; a custom received directly from Pagan- ism, and which presently called to my mind the old descriptions of the heathen temples and al- tars, which are seldom or never mentioned by the ancients without the epithet of perfumed or incensed.* In some of their principal churches, where you have before you, in one view, a great num- * Saepe Jovem vidi, cum jam sua mittere vellet, Fulmina, thuredato sustinuisse man um. — Ovid. Often have I seen Jupiter, when he was about to dart his thunderbolts, upon incense being oilercd, to hold back his hand.— [D.] Thuricremis cum dona imponeret Aris. — Virg. JEn. iv. ver. 453. When he placed gifts on altars perfumed with incense. — [D.] 44 POPERY AND PAGANISM. ber of altars, and all of them smoking at once with steams of incense, how natural is it to imagine one's self transported into the temple of some heathen deity, or that of the Paphian Venus described by Virgil ? Ubi templum illi, centumque Sabaeo Thure calent arae, sertisque recentibus halant. — JEn* i. 417. { Her hundred altars there with garlands crown'd, And richest incense smoking, breathe around Sweet odors," &c. Under the pagan emperors, the use of incense for any purpose of religion was thought so con- trary to the obligations of Christianity, that, in their persecutions, the very method of trying and convicting a Christian was by requiring him only to throw the least grain of it into the censer or on the altar.* Under the Christian emperors, on the other hand, it was looked upon as a rite so peculiarly heathenish, that the very places or houses, where it could be proved to have been done, were by * Maximus dixit : Thure tantum Deos, Nicander, honorato. Nicander dixit : Quomodo potest homo Christianus lapides et ligna colere, Deo relicto immortali? &c — Vid. Act. Mar- tyr. Nicandri, fyc, apud Mabill. Iter. Jtal. T. i. Par. ii. p. 247. Maximus said — 'Only honor the gods with incense, Nican- der.' But Nicander replied— 'How can a Christian man for- sake the eternal God, and worship wood and stone'?' — See Acts of the Martyrs, Nicander, cf»c, in MabUlon, Vol. ii. p. 247. — Adeo ut Christianos vere sacrificare crederent, ubi summis digitis paululum thuris injecissent acerram, &c. — Vide Du- rant. de Ritib. L. i. c. 9. So that they believed Christians to be really sacrificing (to the idols) when they threw the smallest particle of incense into the censer with the tips of their fingers.— [D.] INCENSE — HOLY WATER. 45 a law of Theodosius confiscated to the govern- ment. In the old bass-reliefs, or pieces of sculpture, where any heathen sacrifice is represented, we never fail to observe a boy in sacred habit, which was always white, attending on the priest, with a little chest or box in his hands, in which this incense was kept for the use of the altar.* And in the same manner still in the church of Rome, there is always a boy in surplice, waiting on the priest at the altar with the sacred utensils, and among the rest, the Thuribuhim or vessel of incense, which the priest, with many ridicu- lous motions and crossings, waves several times, as it is smoking around and over the altar in different parts of the service. The next thing that will, of course, strike one's imagination, is their use of holy water; for nobody ever goes in or out of a church, but is either sprinkled by the priest, who attends for that purpose on solemn days, or else serves him- self with it from a vessel, usually of marble, placed just at the door, not unlike to one of our baptismal fonts. Now this ceremony is so no- toriously and directly transmitted to them from Paganism, that their own writers make not the least scruple to own it. The Jesuit la Cerda, in his notes on a passage of Virgil where this prac- tice is mentioned, says, " Hence was derived the custom of holy church, to provide purifying or * Da mihi Thura, pucr, pingucs facientia flamnias.-Oi^/. Give me the incense, boy, making rich flames. — [D.J 46 POPERY AND PAGANISM. holy water at the entrance of their churches/'* Jlquaminarium or Amula, says the learned Montfaucon, was a vase of holy water, placed by the heathen at the entrance of their temples, to sprinkle themselves with.t The same vessel was by the Greeks called Periranterion ; two of which, the one of gold, the other of silver, were given by Croesus to the temple of Apollo at Del- phi ; and the custom of sprinkling themselves was so necessary a part of all their religious offices, that the method of excommunication seems to have been by prohibiting to offenders the approach and use of the holy water-pot. The very composition of this holy water was the same also among the heathen as it is now among the papists, being nothing more than a mixture of salt with common water; and the form of the sprinkling brush, called by the ancients as- persorium or aspergillum^ (which is much the same with what the priests now make use of,) may be seen in bass-reliefs or ancient coins, wherever the insignia, or emblems of the pagan priesthood are described, of which it is generally one.t * Spargens rore levi, &c. — Virg. j£n. vi. 230. Sprinkling with the light dew, &c. — [D.] t Vid. Montfauc. Antiquit. T. ii. P. i. L. iii. c. 6. KadapaTg 61 Apoaois *A(pv6papdfj€uoi artiyzTt vaovg. Eurip. lone, V. 96. Ascend the temples, having sprinkled yourselves with the pure drops. — Euripides. — [D.] t Vid. Montfauc. Antiq. T. ii. P. i. L. iii. c. 6. It may be seen on a silver coin of Julius Caesar, as well as many other emperors. — Ant. Agostini discorso sopra le Mcdaglie. HOLY WATER. 47 Platina, in his Lives of the Popes, and other authors, ascribe the institution of this holy wa- ter to pope Alexander the first, who is said to have lived about the year of Christ 113. But it could not be introduced so early ; since, for some ages after, we find the primitive fathers speak- ing of it, as a custom purely heathenish, and con- demning it as impious and detestable. Justin Martyr says, "That it was invented by demons, in imitation of the true baptism signified by the prophets, that their votaries might also have their pretended purifications by water ;"* and the em- peror Julian, out of spite to the Christians, used to order the victuals in the markets to be sprink- led with holy water, on purpose either to starve, or force them to eat, what, by their own prin- ciples, they esteemed polluted. Thus we see what contrary notions the prim- itive and Romish church have of this ceremony ; the first condemns it as superstitious, abominable, and irreconcilable with Christianity ; the latter adopts it as highly edifying, and applicable to the improvement of Christian piety. The one looks upon it as the contrivance of the devil, to delude mankind; the other as the security of mankind against the delusions of the devil. But what is still more ridiculous than even the cer- emony itself, is to see their learned writers grave- ly reckoning up the several virtues and benefits derived from the use of it, both to the soul and * Kai to \ovrpov d>) tovto aKobcravrcs ot Aaipovcs iia tov TTpo^qrov KtKripvyjxivoVj ivf)pyr\oav kcli fxivTifav lavrovs cig ruvg to. Icpn avrdv empaivovras. Just. Mart. Apul i. p. 91. Edit. Thirlb. 43 TOPERY AND PAGANISM. the body;* and to crown all, producing a long roll of miracles, to attest the certainty of each virtue which they ascribe to it.t Why may we not then justly apply to the present people ot Rome, what was said by the poet of its old in- habitants for the use of this very ceremony? Ah nimium faciles, qui tristia crimina caedis Fluminea tolli posse putetis aqua! — Ovid. Fast. ii. 45. 11 Ah, easy fools, to think that a whole flood Of water e'er can purge the stain of blood." I do not at present recollect whether the an- cients went so far as to apply the use of this ho- ly water to the purifying or blessing their horses, asses, and other cattle ; or whether this be an improvement of modern Rome, which has dedi- cated a yearly festival peculiarly to this service, called, in their vulgar language, the benediction of horses, which is always celebrated with much solemnity in the month of January ; when all the inhabitants of the city and neighbourhood send up their horses, asses, &c, to the convent of St. Anthony, near St. Mary the great, where a priest in surplice at the church door sprinkles with his brush all the animals singly, as they are presented to him, and receives from each owner a gratuity proportionable to his zeal and ability. Amongst the rest, I had my own horses * Durant de Ritib. L. i. c. 21. Hospinian de origine Tem- plorum. L. ii, c. 25. t Hujus aquae benedictse virtus variis miraculis illustratur, &c. — Durant. ibid. The virtue of this holy water is illustrated by various mira- cles, &c— [D.] HOLY WATER. 49 blest at the expense of about eighteen pence of our money ; as well to satisfy my own curiosity, as to humour the coachman ; who was persuad- ed, as the common people generally are, that some mischance would befall them within the year, if they wanted the benefit of this benedic- tion. Mabillon, in giving an account of this function, of which he happened also to be an eye-witness, makes no other reflection upon it, than that it was new and unusual to him.* I have met indeed with some hints of a prac- tice not foreign to this, among the ancients ; of sprinkling their horses with water inthecircen- sian games : but whether this was done out of a superstitious view of inspiring any virtue, or pu- rifying them for those races, which were es- teemed sacred ; or merely to refresh them under the violence of such an exercise, is not easy to determine. But allowing the Romish priests to have taken the hint from some old custom of Paganism; yet this however must be granted them, that they alone were capable of cultivat- ing so coarse and barren a piece of superstition into a revenue sufficient for the maintenance of forty or fifty idle monks. * In Festo Sancti Antonii prope S. Mariam Majorem, ritus nobis insolitus visus est, ut quicquid equorum est in urbe du- cantur cum suis phaleris ad portarn ecclesiae, ubi aqua lustrali ab uno e patribus omnes et singuli asperguntur. Mabill. It. Ital. p. 136. On the feast of St. Anthony, a rite unusual to me was seen near the church of St. Mary Major. Each one of the horses in the city is led with his trappings to the door of the church, where they are all and each sprinkled with holy water by one oi the monks.— [D.] 50 POPERY AND PAGANISM. No sooner is a man advanced a little forward into their churches, and begins to look about him, but he will find his eyes and attention at- tracted by a number of lamps and wax candles, which are constantly burning before the shrines and images of their saints. "In all the great churches of Italy,' 7 says Mabillon,* "they hang up lamps at every altar ;" a sight which will not only surprise a stranger by the novelty of it, but will furnish him with another proof and exam- ple of the conformity of the Romish with the Pagan worship; by recalling to his memory many passages of the heathen writers, where their perpetual lamps and candles are described as continually burning before the altars and statues of their deities.t Herodotus tells us of the Egyptians, (who first introduced the use of lights or lamps into their temples,) that they had a famous yearly festival called, from the principal ceremony of it, the lighting up of candles ;% but there is scarcely a single festival at Rome which might not for the same reason be called by the same name. * Ad singulas ecclesiae aras (qui ritusin omnibus Italiae Ba- silicis observatur) singula? appensae sunt Lampades. Mobil. It. Itol. p. 25. t Centum aras posuit, vigilemque sacraverat ignem. Virg. Mn. iv. 200. He placed a hundred altars, and consecrated the watchful fire. Virgil.— [D.] X Kai ttj bpTJi ovvofia icecrai \v^voKairi. Herod. L. ii. 62. Edit. Lond. And the name applied to the festival was LychnokaU (that is, the festival of Burning Iximps) .— [D .] LIGHTED CANDLES. 51 The primitive writers frequently expose the folly and absurdity of this heathenish custom ;* " they light up candles to God," says Lactantius, 11 as if he lived in the dark ; and do not they de- serve to pass for madmen, who offer lamps to the author and giver of light?" In the collections of old inscriptions, we find many instances of presents and donations from private persons, of lamps and candlesticks to the temples and altars of their gods ; a piece of zeal, which continues still the same in modern Rome, where each church abounds with lamps of massy silver, and sometimes even of gold ; the gifts of princes, and other persons of distinction ; and it is surprising to see how great a number of this kind are perpetually burning before the altars of their principal saints, or miraculous images; as St. Anthony of Padua, or the lady of Loretto ; as well as the vast profusion of wax candles, with which their churches are illumi- nated on every great festival; when the high altar, covered with gold and silver plate, brought out of their treasuries, and stuck full of wax lights disposed in beautiful figures, looks more like the rich side-board of some great prince, dressed out for a feast, than an altar to pay di- vine worship at. * Hospin. de Orig. Templor. L. ii. 22. CHAPTER III. VOTIVE GIFTS, OR OFFERINGS. But a stranger will not be more surprised at the number of lamps, or wax lights burning be- fore their altars, than at the number of offerings, or votive gifts, which are hanging all around them, in consequence of vows made in the time of danger ; and in gratitude for deliverances and cures, wrought in sickness or distress ; a prac- tice so common among the heathen, that no one custom of antiquity is so frequently mentioned by all their writers ; and many of their original donaria, or votive offerings, are preserved to this day, in the cabinets of the curious, viz., images of metal, stone or clay, as well as legs, arms, and other parts of the body, which had formerly been hung up in their temples, in testimony of some divine favor or cure effected by their tutelar de- ity in that particular member :* but the most common of all offerings were pictures, repre- senting the history of the miraculous cure or * Vid. Montfauc. Antiquit. T. ii. Par. I, L. iv. c. 4, 5, 6, VOTIVE OFFERINGS. 53 deliverance, vouchsafed upon the vow of the donor. Nunc, dea, nunc succurre mihi ; nam posse mederi Picta docet templis multa tabella tuis. Tibul. El. i. 3. " Now, goddess, help, for thou canst help bestow, As all these pictures round thy altars show." A friend of Diagoras the philosopher, called the Atheist, having found him once in a temple, as the story is told by Cicero, "You," says he, " who think the gods take no notice of human affairs, do not you see here by this number of pictures, how many people, for the sake of their vows, have been saved in storms at sea, and got safe into harbour ?" " Yes," says Diagoras, "I see how it is; for those are never painted who happen to be drowned."* The temples of iEsculapius were more espe- cially rich in these offerings, which Livy says, were "the price and pay for the cures that he had wrought for the sick :"t where they used al- ways to hang up, and expose to common view, in tables of brass or marble, a catalogue of all the miraculous cures which he had performed for his votaries : a remarkable fragment of one of these tables is still remaining and published in Gruter's Collections, having been found in the ruins of a temple of that god in the island of * Cicero Nat. Deor. L. iii. 253. t Turn donis dives erat, quae remediorum salutarium a?gri mercedern sacraverant Deo. Liv. L. xlv. 28. It (the temple) was rich in the gifts, which the sick had consecrated to the god, as a return for his health-giving reme- dies— [D. J 5* 54 POPERY AND PAGANISM. the Tiber at Rome ; upon which the learned Montfaucon makes this reflection : that " in it are either seen the wiles of the devil, to deceive the credulous; or else the tricks of Pagan priests, suborning men to counterfeit diseases and miraculous cures."* Now this piece of superstition, had been found of old so beneficial to the priesthood, that it could not fail of being taken into the scheme of the Romish worship : where it reigns at this day in as full height and vigor, as in the ages of Pagan idolatry; and in so gross a manner as to give scandal and offence even to some of their own communion. Polydore Virgil, after having de- scribed this practice of the ancients, "in the same manner," says he, "do we now offer up in our churches little images of wax ; and as oft as any part of the body is hurt, as the hand or foot, &c, we presently make a vow to God, or one of his saints, to whom upon our recovery we make an offering of that hand or foot in wax: which custom is now come to that extravagance, that we do the same thing for our cattle, which we do for ourselves, and make offerings on account of our oxen, horses, sheep; where a scrupulous man will question whether in this we imitate the religion or the superstition of our ancestors."! The altar of St. Phillip Neri, says Baronius, "shines with votive pictures and images, the proofs of as many miracles ; receiving every day the additional lustre of fresh offerings from * Montfauc. Antiq T. ii. P. i. L. iv. c. 6. t Polydore Virgil de Inv. Rer. L. v. i. VOTIVE OFFERINGS. 55 those, who have been favored with fresh bene- fits ;"* amongst whom the present Popet himself pays, as I have been told, a yearly acknowledg- ment, for a miraculous deliverance that he ob- tained by the invocation of this saint, when he had liked to have perished under the ruins of a house, overturned in an earthquake. There is commonly so great a number of these offerings hanging up in their churches, that, instead of adding any beauty, they often give offence, by covering or obstructing the sight of something more valuable and ornamental ; which we find to have been the case likewise in the old heathen temples ; where the priests were obliged sometimes to take them down, for the obstruction which they gave to the beauty of a fine pillar or altar. For they consist chiefly, as has been said, of arms and legs, and little figures of wood or wax, but especially of pieces of board painted, and sometimes indeed fine pictures, de- scribing the manner of the deliverance obtained by the miraculous interposition of the saint in- voked : of which offerings, the blessed Virgin is so sure always to carry off the greatest share, that * Baronius's Annals i. An. 57. This Philip Neri is a saint in high esteem in all parts of Italy, where he has many churches dedicated to him ; he was founder of the congregation of the oratory, and died about a century and a half ago : his body lies under his altar, in a fine church called ChiesaNuova, which was founded and built for the service of his congregation ; where we see his picture by Guido, and his statue by Algardi. Cardinal Baronius, who was one of his disciples, lies buried too in the same church. t Benedict XIV.— the reigning Pope from A. D. 1740 to 1758.-[D.] 56 POPERY AND PAGANISM. it maybe truly said of her, what Juvenal says of the goddess Isis, whose religion was at that time in the greatest vogue at Rome, that the painters get their livelihood out of her. Pictores quis nescit ab Iside pasci. Juvenal. " As once to Isis, now it may be said, That painters to the Virgin owe their bread." As oft as I have had the curiosity to look over these donaria, or votive offerings, hanging round the shrines of their images, and consider the sev- eral stories of each, as they are either expressed in painting, or related in writing, I have always found them to be mere copies, or verbal transla- tions of the originals of heathenism; for the vow is often said to have been divinely inspired, or expressly commanded ; and the cure and deliv- erance to have been wrought, either by the visi- ble apparition, and immediate hand of the tute- lar saint, or by the notice of a dream, or some other miraculous admonition from heaven. "There can be no doubt," say their writers, " but that the images of our saints often work signal miracles, by procuring health to the in- firm, and appearing to us often in dreams, to suggest something of great moment for our ser- vice."* And what is all this but a revival of the old impostures, and a repetition of the same old sto- * Extra omnem controversiam est, Sanctorum Imagines mirifica designare miracula, ut et debilibus valetudo bona per eos concilietur, saepeque in somniis apparentes optima quseque nobis consulant. Durant dc Ritib. L. i. c. 5. VOTIVE OFFERINGS. 57 ries, of which the ancient inscriptions are full, with no other difference than what the Pagans ascribed to the imaginary help of their deities, the Papists as foolishly impute to the favor of their saints ; as may be seen by the multitudes of instances which all books of antiquities will furnish ; and whether the reflection of father Montfaucon on the Pagan priests, mentioned above, be not in the very same case, as justly applicable to the Romish priests, I must leave to the judgment of my reader. But the gifts and offerings of the kind, that I have been speaking of, are the fruits only of vulgar zeal, and the presents of inferior people ; whilst princes and great persons, as it used to be of old, frequently make offerings of large vessels, lamps, and even statues of massy silver or gold ; with diamonds, and all sorts of precious stones of incredible value ; so that the church of Lo- retto is now become a proverb for its riches of this sort, just as Apollo's temple at Delphi was with the ancients on the same account. i Ovb* 8aa \atvog ovSog dtpfiropos Ivrds etpyei Qoifiov 'AndWuvos. Homer ll. i. 404. i: Nor all the wealth Apollo's temple holds Can purchase one day's life," &c. In the famed treasury of this holy house, one part consists, as it did likewise among the heathens, of a wardrobe. For the very idols, as Tertullian observes, used to be dressed out in curious robes, of the choicest stuffs and fashion. 58 POPERY AND PAGANISM. While they were showing us therefore the great variety of rich habits with which that treasury abounds ; some covered with precious stones, others more curiously embroidered by such a queen, or princess, for the use of the mi- raculous image; 1 could not help recollecting the picture which old Homer draws of queen Hecuba of Troy, prostrating herself before the miraculous image of Pallas, with a present of the richest and best wrought gown that she was mistress of. Tu5v ev deipapsri 'Eko/jtj rid. in Commod. 9. II Levitic. xxi. 5. Ezek. xliv. 20. IT Levitic. xix. 28; xxi. 5. 120 middleton's defence of certain priests and devotees among the heathens, in order to acquire the fame of a more exalted sanctity. Yet the same discipline, as I have shown in my letter, is constantly practised at Rome, in some of their solemn seasons and pro- cessions, in imitation of those Pagan enthusiasts : as if they searched the Scriptures, to learn, not so much what was enjoined by the true religion, as what had been useful at any time in a false one, to delude the multitude, and support an im- posture. § 4. Holy Water. — Our author makes the same apology for holy water, that he has just made for incense ; that, in the Mosaic law, we find the mention of a water sanctified for reli- gious uses; which cannot therefore be called heathenish ; and that I might, with as good a grace have proved the sacrament of baptism to be heathenish, as their use of holy water. It is surprising to hear such a defence from any one who calls himself a Christian. The sacrament of baptism was ordained by Christ, in the most solemn manner, and for the most solemn pur- pose, as the essential rite of our initiation into his church ; while there is not the least hint in any part of the gospel that any other water was either necessary, or proper, or useful in any de- gree to the washing away of sin. But our au- thor's zeal seems to have carried him here be- yond his prudence ; and he forgets what ground he is treading, if he fancies that he can defend, in this protestant country, what he might affirm with applause in a Popish ; that the institutions THE LETTER FROM ROME. 121 of Christ stand upon no better foundation than the injunctions of the pope, or at least of the Popish church. I have mentioned one use of their holy water in a festival at Rome, called the benediction of horses, which seems to perplex him. He dares not deny the fact, yet labors to render it suspect- ed, and declares, "that though he had spent the greatest part of his life abroad, he had never seen or heard of any such thing." But whatever he thinks, or would seem rather to think of it, I know the thing to be true from the evidence of my own eyes:* yet as I had no desire, that the reader should take my bare word for that, or any other fact in the letter, I took care to add such testimonies of it as every one will allow to be authentic. But if he really be a stranger to so extraordinary a practice, he must be an improper advocate of a cause of which he owns himself to be ignorant. The learned Mabillon, as I have observed, intimates his surprise at this, as well as many other parts of their worship, which he had never seen till he travelled into Italy ; but, instead of defending, chooses either to drop them in silence, or to give them up as superstitious : which might have been the case also of our Catholic, if he had been better informed of the facts which he has undertaken to vindicate. But if these men of learning, and teachers of re- ligion, know so little of what is done at Rome, how easy must it be to impose upon the poor * For the testimony of a recent eye-witness to this absurd ceremony, see Appendix D. 11 122 middleton's defence of Catholics in England, and keep them in the dark, as to the more exceptionable parts of their worship, which are openly avowed and prac- tised abroad, to the scandal of all the candid, and moderate even of their own communion. But though our Catholic seems so much ashamed at present of this benediction of horses in their church. I can give him such light into the origin of it, as will make him proud of it probably for the future : from a story that I have observed in St. Jerom ; which shows it to be grounded on a miracle, and derived from a saint : I mean St. Hilarion, the founder of the monastic orders in Syria and Palestine. The story is this ; " a citizen of Gaza, a Chris- tian, who kept a stable of running horses for the Circensian games, was always beaten by his antagonist, an idolater; the master of a rival stable. For the idolater, by the help of certain charms, and diabolical imprecations, constantly damped the spirits of the Christian's horses, and added courage to his own. The Christian there- fore in despair, applied himself to St. Hilarion, and implored his assistance : but the saint was unwilling to enter into an affair so frivolous and profane; till the Christian urging it as a neces- sary defence against these adversaries of God, whose insults were levelled not so much at him as at the church of Christ; and his entreaties being seconded by the monks, who were present, the saint ordered his earthen jug, out of which he used to drink, to be filled with water and de- livered to the man : who presently sprinkled his THE LETTER FROM ROME. 123 stable, his horses, his charioteers, his chariot, and the very boundaries of the course with it. Upon this, the whole city was in wondrous ex- pectation : the idolaters derided what the Chris- tian was doing; while the Christians took cou- rage, and assured themselves of victory ; till the signal being given for the race, the Christian's horses seemed to fly, whilst the idolater's were laboring behind, and left quite out of sight ; so that the Pagans themselves were forced to cry out, that their god Marnas was conquered at last by Christ."* Thus this memorable function, borrowed originally from the Pagan sprinklers of the Circensian games, appears to be as an- cient almost in the church as monkery itself, and one of the first inventions, for which Popery stands indebted to that religious institution. § 5. Lighted Candles. — As to the lamps and candles, which are constantly burning before the altars of their saints, he tells us once more ; "that though the devil had procured them to be set up in his temples, yet they were appointed originally by God for the service of his taberna- cle; and were not therefore borrowed from the heathenish, but the Mosaic worship." To which I need not repeat what I have already said on the foregoing articles. I had deduced the origin of these lamps from Egypt, upon the authority of Clemens Alexandrinus : but he declares that Clemens says no such thing : yet does not think fit to tell us what it is that he has said, nor how near it approaches to the interpretation which I * Hieron. Op. Tom. iv. par. 2. p. 80. 124 middleton's defence of have given of it. Clemens expressly ascribes the invention of lamps to the Egyptians, in which he is followed by Easebius ; and since lamps were used in all the Pagan temples from the earliest times, of which we have any notice, I take it for a necessary consequence, that the Egyptians were the first who made use of them likewise in their temples. But let that be as it will, this at least is certain, that the use of them in Christian churches was condemned by many of the primitive bishops and presbyters, as superstitious and heathenish. But all these our Catholic makes no scruple to brand with the title of heretics : though many of them, perhaps, might more truly be called the protestants of the primitive church ; particularly Vigilantius;* who, by all that I have been able to observe about him, incurred the charge of heresy for no other crime than that of writing against monkery ; the celibacy of the clergy ; praying for the dead ; worshipping the relics of martyrs ; and lighting up candles to them, after the manner of the Pagans.t But St. Jerom has given the most rational definition of heresy, where he says, ' : that those who interpret Scrip- ture to any sense, repugnant to that of the Holy Spirit, though they should never withdraw themselves from the church, yet may be justly * For an account of the character and doctrines of Viffilan- tius, as also of Jovinian, another reformer of the fifth century, the editor would refer to his ■' History of Romanism," page 78, note,— [D.] t Hieron. Oper. T. iv. par. ii. p. 275, 282. Edit. Benedict. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 125 called heretics."* By which criterion the Ro- mish church will be found much more heretical than any of those who, either in ancient or modern times, have separated themselves from its communion on the account of its doctrines. § 6. Votive Offerings. — My next instance of their Paganism is the number of their donaria or votive offerings, hanging around the altars of their saints : where our author, having nothing to allege from Scripture, nor any example from antiquity, but what is purely heathenish, is forced to change his tone, and to declare, " that things innocent in themselves cannot be rendered unlawful for having been abused by the hea- thens ; and that it cannot be disagreeable to the true God, that those who believe themselves to have received favors from him by the prayers of his saints, should make a public acknowledg- ment of it." But can a practice be called inno- cent which is a confessed copy of Paganish su- perstition 3 which tends to weaken our depend- ence on God, and to place it on those who are not probably in a condition either to hear, or to help us? which imprints the same veneration for the Christian saints that the Pagans paid to their subordinate deities; and transfers the honor due to God to the altars of departed mortals? Such a worship, I say, so far from being innocent, must necessarily be condemned by all unpreju- diced men, as profane and idolatrous ; as it will more evidently appear to be, from our consider- ation of the next article, their worship of images. * Hieron. Oper, T. iv. par. i. p. 302. 11* 126 middleton's defence of § 7. Image Worship. — On this head, our Catholic pours out all his rage against me ; charges me with "slander and misrepresenta- tion, and notorious untruths; says that 1 am no better friend to Christianity than to Popery ; that I imitate the ancient heretics, and copy my ar- guments from the apostate Julian :" by which he shows in what manner he would silence me, if he had me under his discipline : but I can easily forgive his railing, while I find myself out of his power; and rejoice, that we live in a country where he can use a liberty which no Popish government would indulge to a protestant. The ground of all this clamor is, my treating their image worship as idolatrous: yet he does not pretend to contradict my facts, but the inference only, that I draw from them ; and since he can- not overthrow my premises, is the more enraged at my conclusion. I had defined idols, upon the authority of St. Jerom, to be images of the dead : where he is simple enough to imagine that I included in my definition, all images and pictures whatsoever of the dead ; and calls it therefore - : a brat of my own, which I falsely father upon St. Jerom.*' Yet every man must see, that I could mean no other images but such as I was there treating of ; such as had temples, altars, and a religious wor- ship instituted to them ; for such are all the images of the Popish church ; and of all such images of the dead, I shall affirm again with St. Jerom, that they are true and proper idols. It is not my present design to enter into a for- THE LETTER FROM ROME. 127 mal discussion of the nature of idolatry ; which according to every sense of it, as our divines have fully demonstrated, is now exercised in Popish Rome upon the very same principles on which it was formerly practised in Pagan Rome. The purpose of the following letter is to illus- trate this argument by the more sensible evidence of fact: and, in spite of the cavils and evasive distinctions of their schools, to show their wor- ship of images or of saints, call it which they will, to be properly and actually idolatrous. But our author defines idols " to be such images only as are set up for gods, and honored as such ; or in which some divinity or power is believed to reside by their worshippers; who accordingly offer prayers and sacrifice to them, and put their trust in them." "Such" says he, t: were the idolsof the Gentiles," and such, I shall venture to say, are the idols of the Papists. For what else can we say of those miraculous images, as they are called, in every great town of Italy, but that some divinity or power is universally believed to reside in them? Are not all their people persuaded, and do not all their books testify, that these images have some- times moved themselves from one place to an- other ; have wept, talked, and wrought many miracles? And does not this necessarily imply an extraordinary power residing in them ? In the high street of Loretto, which leads to the holy house, the shops are filled with beads, cru- cifixes, Agnus Dei's, and all the trinkets of Po- pish manufacture ; where I observed printed 128 middleton's defence of certificates or testimonials, affixed to each shop, declaring all their toys to have been touched by the blessed image ; which certificates are pro- vided for no other purpose but to humor the gen- eral persuasion, both of the buyer and the seller, that some virtue is communicated by that touch, from a power residing in the image. In one of the churches of Lucca they show an image of the Virgin with the child Jesus in her arms, of which they relate this story, "that a blaspheming gamester, in rage and despair, took up a stone and threw it at the infant; but the Virgin, to preserve him from the blow, which was levelled at his head, shifted him instantly from her right arm into the left, in which he is now held ; while the blasphemer was swallowed up by the earth upon the spot ; where the hole, which they declare to be unfathomable, is still kept open, and enclosed only with a grate, just before the altar of the image. The Virgin, how- ever, received the blow upon her shoulder, whence the blood presently issued, which is pre- served in a crystal, and produced with the great- est ceremony by the priest in his vestments, with tapers lighted, while all the company kiss the sacred relic on their knees."* Now does not the attestation of this miracle naturally tend to per- suade people, that there is an actual power re- siding in the image, which can defend itself from injuries, and inflict vengeance on all who dare to insult it? One of the most celebrated images in Italy is * See Mr. Wright's Travels at Lucca. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 129 that of St. Dominic, of Surrianum in Calabria, which, as their histories testify, was brought down from heaven about two centuries ago, by the Virgin Mary in person, accompanied by Mary Magdalene and St. Catharine. Before this glorious picture, as they affirm, " great numbers of the dead have been restored to life, and hun- dreds from the agonies of death ; the dumb, the blind, the deaf, the lame have been cured, and ail sorts of diseases and mortal wounds miracu- lously healed :" all which facts are attested by public notaries ; and confirmed by the relations of cardinals, prelates, generals, and priors of that order ; and the certainty of them so generally believed, that from the ninth of July to the ninth of August, the anniversary festival of the saint, they have always counted above a hundred thousand pilgrims, and many of them of the highest quality, who come from different parts of Europe to pay their devotions and make their offerings to this picture.* Aringhus, touching upon this subject, in his elaborate account of subterraneous Rome, ob- serves, "that the images of the blessed Virgin shine out continually by new and daily miracles, to the comfort of their votaries, and the confusion of all gainsayers. Within these few years," says he, "under every pope successively, some or other of our sacred images, especially of the more ancient, have made themselves illustrious, and acquired a peculiar worship and veneration by the exhibition of fresh signs; as it is notorious * La vie de St. Dominic, p. 599, 4to. a Paris, 1647. 130 middleton's defence of to all who dwell in this city. But how can I pass over in silence the image of St. Dominic; so conspicuous at this day for its never-ceasing miracles; which attract the resort and admira- tion of the whole Christian world. This picture, which, as pious tradition informs us. was brought down from heaven about the year of our re- demption, 1530, is a most solid bulwark of the church of Christ, and a noble monument of the pure faith of Christians, against all the impious opposers of image worship. The venerable im- age is drawn indeed but rudely, without the help of art or pencil ; sketched out by a celestial hand ; with a book in its right, and a lily in its left hand : of a moderate stature, but of a grave and comely aspect ; with a robe reaching down to the heels. Those who have written its his- tory assert, that the painters in their attempts to copy it, have not always been able to take simi- lar copies : because it frequently assumes a dif- ferent air, and rays of light have been seen by some to issue from its countenance ; and it has more than once removed itself from one place to another. The worship therefore of this picture is become so famous through all Christendom, that multitudes of people, to the number of a hundred thousand and upwards, flock annually to pay their devotions to it, on the festival of the saint ; and though it be strange, which 1 have now related, yet what I am going to say is still stranger, that not only the original picture, made not by human, but by heavenly hands, is cele- brated for its daily miracles, but even the copy THE LETTER FROM ROME. 131 of it, which is piously preserved in this city, in the monastery called St. Mary's above the Mi- nerva, is famous also in these our days for lis perpetual signs and wonders, as the numberless votive offerings hanging around it, and the bracelets and jewels which adorn it testify." * All their apologists indeed declare, what our Catholic also says on this head, "that they do not ascribe these miracles to any power in the image itself, but to the power of God, who is moved to work them by the prayers and inter- cession of his saints, for the benefit of those who have sought that intercession before their pic- tures or images ; and in order to bear testimony to the faith and practice of the church in this particular article. "t But how can we think it possible that the Deity can be moved to exert his power so wonderfully for the confirmation of such ridiculous stories of pictures and statues sent down from heaven ; which while they blasphe- mously impute to the workmanship of saints or angels, or of God himself,! are yet always so rudely and contemptibly performed, that a mod- erate artist on earth would be ashamed to call them his own ? Or is it at all credible, that the saints in heaven should be as busy and ambi- tious as their votaries are on earth, to advance the peculiar honors of their several altars, by their continual intercessions at the throne of * Aring. Roma Subterran. Tom. ii. p. 464. § 13. tCathol. Christ, p. 251. t Imaginem 0z6tcvktov. Euagr. The God- made image. — [D.] 132 middleton's defence of grace? Or that their whole care above, if they really have any, which reaches to things below, should be employed, not for the general advance- ment of religion and piety among men, but of their own private glory and worship, in prefer- ence to all their competitors ? No; the absur- dity of such notions and practices makes it ne- cessary to believe that they were all occasionally forged for the support of some lucrative scheme ; or to revive the expiring credit of some favorite superstition, which had been found highly ben- eficial to the contrivers of such forgeries. For the very effect, of which they boast, as a proof of the miracle, betrays the fraud ; and the multi- tude of pilgrims and offerings, to which they appeal, instead of demonstrating the truth of the fact, does but expose the real ground of the im- posture. But to return to my antagonist : if we should ask him once more, whether there was ever a temple in the world not purely heathenish, in which there were any images, ejected on altars, for the purpose of any religious worship what- soever; he must be obliged to answer in the negative. He would be forced likewise to con- fess that there were many such temples in Pagan Rome, and particularly the Pantheon, which re- mains still in Christian Rome; on whose nu- merous altars as there formerly stood the images of as many Pagan divi or idols, so there are now standing the images of as many Popish divi or saints ; to whom the present Romans pay their vows and offer prayers, as their inclinations sev- THE LETTER FROM ROME. 133 erally lead them to this or that particular altar: and no man will pretend to say that there is not the greatest conformity between the present and the ancient temple ; or that it would not be dif- ficult to furnish out a private room more exactly to the taste of the old Romans, than this Popish church stands now adorned with all the furni- ture of their old Paganism. We are informed by Plato, that there were images in the temples of Egypt from the earliest antiquity :* and it appears evidently from Scrip- ture that they subsisted there, as well as in Pa- lestine, before the time of Moses. The strict prohibition of them therefore to the Jews, while several other rites of the heathens were indulged to them, in condescension to their peculiar cir- cumstances and carnal affections, carries a strong intimation that images are of all things the most dangerous to true religion ; as tending naturally to corrupt it, by introducing superstition and idolatry into the worship of God. The Christian emperors,as I have intimated in my letter, strictly prohibited their Pagan subjects to light up can- dles, offer incense, or hang up garlands to sense- less images : for these were then reckoned the notorious acts of genuine Paganism? Yet we now see all these very acts performed every day in Popish countries to the images of the Popish saints. In a word, since there never was an image in the temple of the true God, in any age of the world, yet a perpetual use of them in all the * Plat, de Legib. L. ii. p. 656. 12 134 middlkton's defence of temples of the heathens, it is in vain to dispute about their origin; the thing is evident to a de- monstration; they must necessarily be derived to the present Romans, from those who always used, and not from those who always detested them ; that is, from their Pagan, not their Chris- tian ancestors. They may quibble therefore as long as they please; and talk of their decrees and canons, contrived to amuse the public, and elude the arguments of protestants, by subtle and specious distinctions; while every traveller who sees what passes at the shrine of any cele- brated saint, or miraculous image in Italy, will be convinced by ocular demonstration, that their people are trained, instructed, and encouraged to believe, that there is a divinity or power re- siding in those images, and that they actually offer up prayers and put their trust in them. For if there is no such belief amongst them, as this Catholic affirms, for what purpose do they expose those images so solemnly, and carry them about in procession, on all occasions of public distress ? Is there any charm in a block of wood or stone, to produce rain, or avert a pes- tilence? Or, can senseless images have any influence towards moving the will of God ? No ; their priests are not so silly as to imagine it : the sole end of producing them is, not to move God, but the populace j to persuade the deluded mul- titude, that there is a power in the image, that can draw down blessings upon them from hea- ven : a doctrine that repays all their pains of in- culcating it, by a perpetual supply of wealth THE LETTER FROM ROME. 135 to the treasury of the church. This therefore, as it appears from undeniable facts, is the uni- versal belief of all Popish countries; grounded, as they all assert, on the evidence of perpetual miracles, wrought by the particular agency of these sacred images, of which I could produce innumerable instances from their own books. § 8. The miraculous picture of St, Mary. — In a collegiate church of regular canons, called St. Mary, of Impruneta, about six miles from Florence, there is a miraculous picture of the Virgin Mary, painted by St. Luke, and held in the greatest veneration through all Tuscany : which, as oft as that state happens to be visited by any calamity, or involved in any peculiar danger, is sure to be brought out, and carried in procession through the streets of Florence ; at- tended by the prince himself, with all the no- bility, magistrates, and clergy ; where it has never failed to afford them present relief in their greatest difficulties. In testimony of which they produce authentic acts and records, confirmed by public inscriptions, setting forth all the par- ticular benefits miraculously obtained from each procession ; and the several offerings made on that account to the sacred image, for many cen- turies past, down to these very times ; from the notoriety of which facts it became a proverb over Italy, that "the Florentines had got a Madonna which did for them whatever they pleased."* * Passu in proverbio per tutta Tltalia ; che i Fiorcntini ban- no una Madonna, che fa a lor modo. Mcmoric Istorichc ddla Miracolona lmmagine l tf*c. in Firen. 1714, 4to. p. 85. 136 middleton's defence of Among the numerous inscriptions of this sort there is one in the church of Impruneta, to this effect: "That the sacred image being carried with solemn pomp into Florence, when it was visited by a pestilence for three years succes- sively, and received with pious zeal by the great duke, Ferdinand II., and the whole body of the people, who came out to meet it, and having marched about the city for three days in pro- cession, the fierceness of the pestilence began miraculously to abate, and soon after entirely ceased. Upon which the magistrates of health, by a general vow of the citizens, made an offer- ing of ten thousand ducats of gold, to be em- ployed for providing portions for twenty young women of Impruneta, to be disposed of annually in marriage, and placed that inscription as a monument of so signal a benefit. A. D. 1G33.''* During the time of these processions, they al- ways inscribe certain hymns, or prayers, or eulo- giums of the Virgin, over the doors and other conspicuous places of each church, where the image reposes itself for any time; in order to raise the devotion of the people towards the sa- cred object before them. In a procession made A. D. 1711, the following inscription was placed over the principal gate of one of their great churches — " The gate of celestial benefit. The gate of salvation. Look up to the Virgin herself. Pass into me all ye who desire me. Whosoever shall find me, will find life and draw salvation * Memorie Istoriche della Miracolosa Immagine, &-c, in Firen. 1714, 4to. p. 202. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 137 from the Lord. For there is no one who can be saved, O most holy Virgin, bat through thee. There is no one who can be delivered from evils, but through thee. There is no one from whom we can obtain mercy, but through thee." In the conclusion are these expressions, — u Mary in- deed opens the bosom of her mercy to all; so that the whole universe receives out of her ful- ness. The captive, redemption ; the sick, a cure: the sad, comfort ; the sinner , pardon ; the just, grace; the angel, joy ; the whole Trinity, glory."* Now what can we say of a devotion so ex- travagant and blasphemous, but that it is a re- vival of the old heresy of the Collyridians ;t maintained by a sect of silly women ; who fell into their foolish error or madness, as Epipha- nius calls it, through an excess of zeal towards the blessed Virgin, whom they resolved to ad- vance into a goddess, and to introduce the wor- ship of her as such into the Christian church. % * Janua ccelcstis beneficii. Janua Salutis. Ipsam Virgin- em attendite. Trail site ad me omnes qui concupiscitis me. — Qui me invenerit, inveniet vitam et hauriet salutem a Domino. Nemo enim est qui salvus fiat, O Sanctissima, nisi per Te. Nemo est qui liberetur a malis nisi per te. Nemo est cujus misereatur gratia nisi per te. Maria profecto omnibus misericordise sinum aperit, ut de plenitudine ejus accipiant Universi. Captivus redemptioncm, JEger curationem, Tristis consolationem, Peccator veniam, Justus gratiam, Angelus laetitiam, tota Trinitas gloriam. Mc- morie htoricke della Miracolosa Immaginc, tj'*c, in Firen. 1714, 4to. p. 234. t Collyridians. — This sect, which arose in the fourth cen- tury, was so called from the cakes (collyridce) which th. y offered in honor of the Virgin. See " Dowling's History of Roman- ism," p. 82. : Epiph. adv. H«r. Vol. I. p. 1058. Edit. Par. 1622, 12* 139 middleton's defence of I cannot dismiss the story of this wonderful picture, without giving the reader some account of its origin, as it is delivered by their writers, not grounded, as they say, on vulgar fame, but on public records, and histories, confirmed by a perpetual series of miracles. " When the inhab- itants of Impruneta had resolved to build a church to the Virgin, and were digging the foun- dations of it with great zeal, on a spot marked out to them by heaven ; one of the laborers happened to strike his pickaxe against something under ground, from which there issued presently a complaining voice or groan. The workmen, being greatly amazed, put a stop to their work for a while, but having recovered their spirits after some pause, they ventured to open the place from which the voice came, and found the miraculous image."* This calls to my mind a Pagan story of the same stamp, and in the same country, preserved to us by Cicero, concerning the origin of divina- tion. " That a man being at plough in a cer- tain field of Etruria, and happening to strike his plough somewhat deeper than ordinary, there started up before him out of the furrow, a deity, whom they called Tages. The ploughman, terrified by so strange an apparition, made such an outcry that he alarmed all his neighbors, and in a short time drew the whole country around him ; to whom the god, in the hearing of them all, explained the whole art and mystery of di- vination : which all their writers and records * Epiph. adv. Haer. Vol I. p. 53, &c. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 139 affirmed, to be the genuine origin of that disci- pline, for which the old Tuscans were afterwards so famous." Now these two stories forged at different times in the same country, and for the same end of supporting an idolatrous worship, bear such a resemblance to each other, that every one will see the one to have been a bungling imitation of the other; and we may say of the Popish Ma- donna, what Cicero says of the Pagan Tages, '•that none can be so silly as to believe that a god was ever dug out of the ground; and that an attempt to confute such stories would be as silly as to believe them." * My design therefore in collecting them was not so much to expose the folly of them to my protestant readers, as to admonish our papists, by unquestionable facts and instances, drawn from the present practice of Rome, into what a labyrinth of folly and im- piety their principles will naturally lead them, when they are pushed to their full length, and exerted without reserve or restraint ; and to lay before them the forgeries and impostures which are practised in their church, to support the ab- surd doctrines which she imposes, as the neces- sary terms of Catholic communion. But their constant method of recurring to dif- ferent saints in their different exigencies, is no- thing else, as many writers have observed, but an exact copy of the Pagan superstition, ground- ed, on a popular belief, that their saints, like the old demons, have each their distinct provinces, * Cicero dc Divhi. ii. 23. 140 middleton's defence of or prefectures, assigned to them; some over particular countries, cities, societies, and even the different trades of men ; others over the sev- eral diseases of the body, or the mind ; others over the winds, the rain, and various fruits of the earth.* So that God's rebuke to the aposta- tizing Jews, is full as applicable to the papists, for committing whoredoms with their idols, and saying, "I will go after my lovers, who give me my bread and my water : my wool and my flax ; mine oil and my drink — for they did not know that I gave them their corn, and wine, and oil, and multiplied their silver and gold which they prepared for Baal."t § 9. Images not defensible. — Our Catholic proceeds to affirm that all the devotion paid to their saints extends no farther than to desire their prayers, and that the pictures and images of them, which we see in their churches, are no more than mere memorials, designed to express the esteem which they retain for the persons so represented ; or as helps to raise their affections to heavenly things; and that every child amongst them knows this to be true. Yet I have de- monstrated from their public inscriptions, as well as the explicit testimonies of their writers, that those images are placed by them in their churches, as the proper objects of religious ado- ration ; and that they ascribe to their divi, or saints, who are represented by them, the very same titles, powers and attributes, which the * Orig. con. Cels. 8, p. 239. t Hosea ii. 5, 7. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 141 heathens ascribed to their deities ; invoking them as tutelary divinities; as presiding over their temples, and the affairs of men, as most powerful, invincible, and always ready to help and relieve their votaries. All which is con- firmed by the constant style of their prayers, and the express language of their liturgies, missals, and breviaries, set forth at Rome by public au- thority : in which the Virgin is called " the mother of mercy, hope of the world, the only trust of sinners ;" and the saints addressed to under the titles of intercessors, protectors, and dispensers of grace. Maldonatus calls it " an impious and silly error of the protestants to think that no religious worship is due to any but to God." And some of their expurgatary indexes go so far as to ex- punge all those passages of the primitive fathers which teach, that creatures ought not to be adored* The Abbot de Marolles relates a conversation in which he was once engaged with a Capuchin, who had been employed in several missions, and a celebrated preacher of France ; in the presence of a Hugonot gentleman ; for whose sake the abbot took occasion to speak of images in the same moderate strain, in which our Catholic thinks fit to treat them in his present address to protestants; "that they were placed in their * Salve Regina ; Mater misericord ice, vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra, salve. Ad Te clamamus exules filii Evoe, &c. Ojfflc. Beat. Virg. Maldonat. in Mat, v, 35. Index Expurgat. Ma- drid, 1612. Hail, O queen ! mother of mercy, our life, delight, and hope, hail ! We cry to thee 3 exile children of Eve, &c— [D.] 142 middleton's defence of churches not for the people to adore, or put their trust in them, but to edify their senses, by the representation of holy things. But the abbot's discourse gave offence both to the friar and the preacher; they insisted on a higher degree of veneration, urged the stories of their miraculous images, and the extraordinary devotion that was paid by the Pope, the bishops, and the whole church, to some of them, which had been known to speak, or were brought down from heaven, or made by the hands of apostles and angels ; or had been consecrated on the account of some particular virtues, and were carried for that rea- son in processions, and worshipped on altars, as well as the sacred relics ; whose miracles could not be contested by any, but obstinate heretics, who would sooner renounce the testimony of their senses, than be convinced of their errors. In short, the Capuchin declared that the autho- rity of the church was the sole rule of faith ; and that to resist it was a manifest rebellion, and worthy of the last punishment."* And this * Mais tout ce discours ne plut pas encore au Religieux, ni mesmes a M. Hersaut, qui vouloit quelque chose de plus ; pour preuve de quoy, l'un et l'autre mirent en avant les images mi- raculeuses, et marquerent mesmes les respects extraordinairies, que le S. Pere, les Evesques, et toute l'Eglise rendent a quel- ques unes, qui ont parle, ou qui sont descendues du Ciel, ou qui ont ete faconnees de la propre main des Apostres, et des Anges, ou qui sont consacrees pour quelque vertu particuliere. lesquelles a cause de cela se portent en procession et sont reve- rees sur les Autels, aussi bien que les saintes Reliques, dont les miracles ne peuvent estre contestez, que par les Heretiques opiniastres, qui combattent mesmes le tesmoignage des sens, quand il s'agit de la conviction de leur erreur. — Le Capucin estima, qu'il falloit defendre tout ce qui l'Eglise recoit ; — que cela seul estoit la regie de la foy : et que ce seroit une rebellion THE LETTER FROM ROME. 143 opinion after all. maintained by the friar, is the genuine notion of image worship, which prevails at this day in the Romish church, and especially in Italy, as I have fully demonstrated by the facts above recited. I have said in my letter, that several of the ancient heroes were more worthy of veneration than some of the modern saints, who have dis- possessed them of their shrines ; and that I should sooner pay divine honors to the founders of empires than to the founders of monasteries. This our author aggravates into a heavy charge against me ; as if I were offended to see the hea- then temples converted into Christian churches, and had actually preferred the Pagan deities, before the martyrs of Christ. Where, according to his custom, he either widely mistakes, or wil- fully misrepresents my meaning; for as to the genuine saints and martyrs of the Christian church, that is. all those who in past ages have lived agreeably to the rules of the gospel, or died ill the defence of it, I reverence them as highly as they ought to be reverenced by any Christian, yet shall never be induced to worship them : I consider them as illustrious proofs of the excel- lence of the Christian doctrine ; and shining ex- amples of piety and fortitude to all succeeding ages. But as for the Popish saints, I believe several of them to be wholly fictitious ; many more to have spent their lives contemptibly : and manifestc d'y resister ce qui ne seroit diffne de rien moins, que du dernier chastiment. Memoir es de M. de Marolles. par. i. p. 164. 144 MIDDLETOX'S DEFENCE OF some of them even wickedly: and out of these three classes, let our author choose where he will ; out of the fictitious, the contemptible, or the wicked ; I shall venture to affirm once more, that I would sooner worship Romulus, or Anto- nine, than any of them : sooner pay my devotion to the founders, than to the disturbers of king- doms; sooner to the benefactors, than to the persecutors of mankind ; and this is the whole that I have ever meant. § 10. Fictitious Saints. — But our author calls it a notorious falsehood to say, " that many of their saints were never heard of but in their le- gends ; or had no other merit but of throwing kingdoms into convulsions, for the sake of some gainful imposture :" yet I have produced several instances of the first sort, which every reasona- ble man must think decisive ; in the case of E vo- dia, St. Viar, Amphibolus, Veronica : but no such saints, he says, were ever honored in their church : by which he means nothing more, as he himself explains it, than that they never were formally canonized, and entered into the Roman martyrology; which is nothing to the purpose: since, as I have shown from unquestionable au- thority, they were all honored with altars and images, and openly worshipped in Catholic coun- tries, as saints and martyrs ; and that Veronica in particular, though the name only of a picture, was advanced into a person, by the authority of pope Urban ; and placed as such upon an altar, in the face of all Christendom, in St. Peter's at Rome. Yet all men who know any thing of THE LETTER FROM ROME. 145 history, either sacred or profane, must necessa- rily be convinced that the whole story, not only of the saint, but of the picture also, which they expose on certain festivals with the greatest pomp, and for the original of which different cities contend, is a mere cheat and forgery. It is a thing confessed and lamented by the gravest of their own communion, that the names and worship of many pretended saints, who never had a real existence, had been fraudu- lently imposed upon the church. The cele- brated Dr. John de Launoy was famous for clearing the calendar of several who had long been worshipped in France, as the tutelary saints of some of their principal towns : so that it used to be said of him, "that there never passed a year in which he did not pluck a saint out of paradise." * In the catacombs of Rome, which, in the times of heathenism was the burial place of the slaves, and poorer citizens, and where the bones of Pagans and Christians lie jumbled promis- cuously together, if they happen to find a little vial or piece of glass tinged with red, at the mouth of any particular hole, they take it pres- ently, (as the learned Montfaucon informs us,) for a certain proof of martyrdom ; and, by the help of the next inscription, that they can pick up from some neighboring grave-stone, presently create a new saint and martyr to the Popish church. Mabillon, as I have observed, wishes "that they would be more scrupulous on this * Bayle Diet, in Launoy. 13 146 middleton's defence of head : and not forge so many fabulous stories of saints, without any certain name ; nor impose Paganish inscriptions for Christian upon the church." Our Catholic himself, in this very work where he is laboring to give the most specious turn to every part of their worship, is forced to allow such a confusion and jumble among the martyrs and their relics, as approaches very nearly to what I am now affirming : he says, " that many of their saints having borne the same name, it easily happens that the relics, which belong to one, are attributed to another, and that there are many ancient martyrs, whose names at present are unknown, yet whose relics have all along been honored in the church; and that it was easy for the ignorance of some, or the vanity of others, to attribute to them the names of other saints." The old Athenians were called super- stitious by the apostle, for erecting an altar to the unknown God ; but our papists, we see, by their own confession, erect altars to unknown saints, and unknown relics. Upon the mention of these relics, I cannot help observing, that the superstitious veneration and solemn translations of them, which make so great a part of the Popish worship, afford an- other instance of a practice clearly derived to them from Paganism; the whole process and ceremonial of which, as it is exercised at this day, may be seen in Plutarch's account of the translation of the bones of Theseus, from the Isle of Seyms to Athens : and as this resolution was THE LETTER FROM ROME. 147 first suggested to the Athenians by an appari- tion of Theseus himself, and enjoined to them afterwards by the Delphic oracle; so the dis- covery and translation of their relics in the Ro- mish church j are usually grounded on some pre- tended vision or revelation from heaven. "When Cimon then had conquered the Island of Scyrus, where Theseus died, being very so- licitous, as Plutarch relates, to find out the place where he lay buried, and unable to procure any information about it, he happened to espy an eagle upon a rising ground, pecking the earth with its beak, and tearing it up with its talons ; and conceiving this to be a divine omen and sign to him, he began immediately to dig, and found the coffin of a man of more than ordinary size, with a brazen lance and sword lying by him; all which he took away with him into his galley, and transported to Athens; where the whole body of the people, upon notice of his arrival, came out to receive the sacred relics in a solemn and pompous procession, performing public sa- crifices and expressing all the same marks of joy, as if Theseus himself had been returning to them alive. They interred his bones in the midst of the city, where his sepulchre is still a sanctuary for slaves and the meaner citizens; Theseus having always been esteemed a par- ticular patron of the poor and distressed. The chief festival, which they celebrate annually to his honor, is the eighth of October ; on which he returned victorious from Crete with the young captives of Athens, yet they observe likewise 148 middleton's defence of the eighth of every month as a kind of inferior holyday or memorial of him." * But to pursue the objections of our Catholic; he declares my account of St. Oreste, whose name I suppose to have been derived from the mountain Soracte on which his monastery now stands, to be ridiculous beyond measure ; yet Mr. Addison, who was no ridiculous author, has related it as a certain fact; which he borrowed probably from some of their own writers, or at least from some of the antiquaries of Rome, among whom I heard the same story. But if the notion of fictitious saints be so notoriously false, as he asserts it to be, let him tell us, if he can, in what history we may find the acts of those very saints whom I have named, and whom their church adopts as genuine, St. Oreste, Baccho, Quirinus, Romula, and Redempta, Con- cordia, Nympha, Mercurius. The creation of saints is become as common almost as the creation of cardinals; there hav- ing seldom been a Pope who did not add some to the calendar. Benedict XIII. canonized eight in one summer; and his successor, Clem- ent XII., the last Pope, four more. During my stay at Rome, I saw the beatification of one Andrew Conti, of the family of the Pope, then reigning, Innocent XIII.; for this is another source of supplying fresh saints to the church ; when to humor the ambition of the Pope, or the * Plutar. in Thes. ad fin. The English reader may find this story in the American (Baltimore) edition of Langhorne's translation of Plutarch's Lives, page 12.— [D.] THE LETTER FROM ROME. 149 other princes of that communion, this honor is conferred on some of their name and family : and as there must be a testimony of miracles, wrought by every person so canonized or beati- fied, either when living or dead, so I was curious to inquire what miracles were ascribed to this beatified Andrew; which 1 found to be nothing else but a few contemptible stories, delivered down by tradition, which showed only the weak- ness of the man, and the absurdity of believing that God should exert his omnipotence for the production of such trifles. As to the proof of miracles, which is essential to these canonizations, every one will conceive how easy it must be, in a function contrived to serve the interest of the church and the ambition of its rulers, to procure such a testimonial of them as will be sufficient for the purpose. In the deifications of ancient Rome, the attestation also of a miracle was held necessary to the act. In the case of Romulus, one Julius Proculus, a man said to be of a worthy and upright charac- ter, took a solemn oath, "that Romulus himself appeared to him, and ordered him to inform the senate, of his being called up to the assembly ot the gods, under the name of duirinus;"* and in the deification of the Csesars, a testimony upon oath of an eagle's flying out of the funeral pile, towards heaven, which was supposed to convey the soul of the deceased, was the estab- lished proof of their divinity. Now as these Pagan deifications are the only patterns in his- * Vid. Plutar. in vit. Romul. Dionys. Halicar. L. ii. p. 121. 13* 130 3iiddleton's defence of tory for the Popish canonizations; so the inven- tion of miracles is the single art in which mod- ern Rome is allowed to excel the ancient. §11. St. Thomas a Becket. — In the Jesuit's College at St. Omer's, the father, who showed us the house, happening to produce some relic, or memorial of St. Thomas, which he treated with much reverence, one of our company asked me what Thomas he meant? upon which I un- warily said, "it is Thomas Becket, who is wor- shipped as a great saint on this side of the wa- ter :" yes, sir, replied the Jesuit, with a severe look, " if there is any faith in history, he deserves to be esteemed a great saint." But I may venture to affirm in England, what I did not care to dis- pute in a college of Jesuits, that this celebrated Thomas had more of the rebel than of the saint in him ; was a prelate of a most daring, turbu- lent, seditious spirit ; inflexibly obstinate, insa- tiably ambitious, intolerably insolent; whose violence the Pope himself endeavored in vain to moderate; as it appears from such monuments as the Papists themselves must allow to be au- thentic, a collection of Becket's own letters, pre- served still in the Vatican, and printed some years ago in Brussels.* From these letters, I say, it appears that not only the king, and the whole body of his barons, but even the bishops, abbots, and clergy, openly condemned his behaviour as highly rash and criminal ; they charged him with being the sole " disturber of the peace of the kingdom: that * Epist. ct Vit. Div. Thorns. 2 vol. 4to. Bruxellis, 1652. THE LETTER FROx^I ROME. 151 while he was making all that stir about the lib- erties of the church, he himself was the chief in- fringer of them ; that he was not ashamed to publish the most notorious lies in favor bf his own cause ; that he refused to restore to the king forty thousand marks, which had been commit- ted to him in trust; that he was guilty of the most detestable ingratitude to the king, whom he treated worse than a heathen or publican, though he had been raised by him from the low- est condition, to the highest favor, and entrusted by him with the command of all his dominions, and made his chancellor, and archbishop of Can- terbury, contrary to the advice of his mother, the empress, and the remonstrances of the nobility; and to the great grief and mortification of the whole clergy :" all which the bishops and clergy of the realm expressly affirm in their common letters, not only to the Pope, but to Becket him- self ; accusing him likewise of " traitorous prac- tices, and of using all endeavors to excite the king of France, and the court of Flanders, to enter into a war against his king and country." When he was cited by the king to answer for his maladministration, before the bishops and barons of the realm, he absolutely refused to ap- pear ; declaring himself " responsible to none but God ; and that as much as the soul was superior to the body, so much were all people obliged to obey him rather than the king, in all things re- lating to God and his church ; who had estab- lished bishops to be the judges and fathers of l: ~s themselves; and as neither law nor rea- 152 middleton's defence of son allowed children to judge their parents, so he renounced the judgment of the king and the barons, and all other persons whatsoever, and acknowledged no judge but God and his sove- reign vicar on earth, the Pope." * Yet this man is now adored as one of the principal saints and martyrs of the Romish church ; whose charac- ter I have chosen to insist upon the more par- ticularly, as it will teach us by an illustrious example, from our own history, what kind of merit it is, that has exalted so many others in the same church, to the same honors. Let our Catholic tell us also, if he pleases, what opinion his church entertains of Garnet the Jesuit, who was privy to the gunpowder plot, and hanged for his treason ; if he dares to speak his mind, he will declare him to be a saint and martyr of Christ ; for such he is held to be at Rome and St. Omer's: yet all protestants will rank him, I dare say, among those saints whom I justly call the disturbers of kingdoms; and who merited the honor of their saintship, not by spreading the light of the gospel, but scattering firebrands and destruction through the world. § 12. Transiibstantiation. — Our author can- not comprehend why I should bring in the ado- ration of the host among the other articles of my charge ; since, by my own confession, I find no resemblance of it in any part of the Pagan worship : but 1 have given a good reason for my not finding it there, which might have taught him also, why I brought it in ; because it was * La vie de Saint Thorn. Archevesque de Canterb. p. 129. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 153 too absurd for the practice even of the heathens, who thought that none could ever be so mad as to make it a point of religion, to eat their God. This I showed from the authority of Tully; whom I prefer therefore, he says, to the apostles and evangelists : as if those sacred writers had expressly declared the sacramental bread to be God ; which all protestants deny, in that gross and ridiculous sense, in which the Papists inter- pret them. But as it is not my present purpose to examine the real merit of Transubstantiation, so I shall take notice only of one argument that he alleges for it, which, if it has any force, must be allowed indeed to be conclusive; that "the unerring authority of the church has declared it to be true, and enjoined the belief of it ;" and af- ter such a decision, " that it is the part of an in- fidel, rather than a Christian, to ask how can this be?" This is the last resort of Popery ; the sum of all their reasoning : to resolve all religion into an implicit faith, and a slavish obedience to the authority of the church ; which by innumerable texts of Scripture, says our author, is declared to be the indispensable duty of every Christian. We may spare ourselves then the pains of think- ing and inquiring; drop the perilous task of studying the Scriptures ; the church, like an in- dulgent mother, takes all that trouble upon her- self; warrants her doctrines to be divine; and ensures our salvation, on the single condition of taking her word for it. But all protestants must see the horrible effects of such a principle ; an 154 middleton's defence of Inquisition ready to satisfy all their doubts ; a prison and tortures prepared for those who dare to ask their priests, what Nicodemus asked our Saviour, how can these things be? Thus our Catholic, in mentioning the case of a protestant, converted to their faith, who may happen to be possessed still with some scruples, declares u that he has nothing to fear in conforming himself to the authority of the church, but very much, in making any scruple to hear and obey his spir- itual guides." hi this doctrine of Transubstantiation we see a remarkable instance of the prolific nature of error; and how one absurdity naturally begets another : for the first consequence of it was, to render one half of the sacramental institution superfluous, by denying the cup to the laity ; though our Saviour expressly commanded all his disciples to drink of it, and declared, that without drinking, they could have no life in them.* Yet grant them their Transubstantia- tion, and the conclusion is natural, as our Ca- tholic has deduced it ; " for whosoever," says he, * Matt. xxvi. 27. John vi. 53. 1 Cor. xi. 23.— In the pas- sage cited by Dr. Middleton, from John vi. 53, " Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of Man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you," there is no reason to suppose that our Lord referred to the Supper, which was not then instituted. If he did, then the words would imply that a participation in the Lord's Sup- per w T as absolutely essential to salvation. The meaning un- questionably is, that without that faith in the sacrifice of Christ, which is represented under the significant figure of eat- ing his flesh and drinking his blood, a person could have no spiritual life in him. The true believer's life is a life of faith upon the Son of God, who hath loved him and given himself for him. — [D.] THE LETTER FROM ROME. 155 " receives the body of Christ, most certainly re- ceives his blood at the same time, since the body which he receives is a living body, and cannot be without blood. There is no taking Christ by pieces ; whoever receives him, receives him whole ; and since he is as truly and really pres- ent in one kind as in both, he brings with him consequently the same grace, when received in one kind, as when received in both." But if they were disposed to use their reason on this occasion, a conclusion, so contradictory to the express institution of the gospel, would convince them of the falsehood of those principles, by Avhich they were led into it ; and oblige them to distrust their premises, which have always been disputed, rather than reject a clear precept of Christ, on which there never was, or can be any reasonable dispute. As to my sixth and seventh instances of their Paganism, since our Catholic has offered nothing upon them worth the pains of considering, I shall refer the reader to my letter, without troubling him with any thing farther about them, and proceed to the more important article of their miracles. § 13. Spurious Miracles, — Here he begins to grow warm again, and declares, "that I am al- ways offended with miracles, wherever I meet them ; and is sorry that I do not speak out in favor of my friends the freethinkers, and show the Jewish and Christian miracles to be no bet- ter than those of the Pagans." This is the con- stant refuge of baffled zealots to throw the odium 156 middleton's defence of of infidelity and free thinking on those who dare to expose their impostures. But he hoped per- haps to find some even of our own church ready- to join with him in the cry; since he appears to be no stranger to the offence, which the freedom of this very letter had given to certain men, who are too apt to consider their own opinions as the standard of Christian faith ; and to treat even the defenders of our religion as deserters, if they do not submit to act under their direction, and defend it by their principles. These men im- agined that I had attacked the Popish miracles with a gayety that seemed to contemn all mira- cles, and particularly those of our Saviour; by invalidating the force of those rules which Mr. Leslie had established as the criterion of true miracles: whereas the truth of the matter is, as I have often declared it to my friends, that at the time of writing the letter I had never read Mr. Leslie's treatise, nor so much as knew what his rules were. My only view was to expose the forgery of the Popish miracles in the strongest manner that I was able ; and in spite of all the evidence, which they pretend to produce for them, to show that they stood upon no better ground than those of their Pagan ancestors. I had observed, not only from books, but from experience, what these cavillers perhaps were not so well apprized of, that the pretence of miracles was the grand sup- port of the Romish church, and what gave a sanction to all their other frauds ; that their con- stant appeal to a divine power, exerting itself THE LETTER FROM ROME. 157 miraculously amongst them, gave them not only their chief advantage against protestants, but furnished the deists also with the most obvious arguments against revelation itself : for "these pious cheats," as Mr. Leslie says, "are the sorest disgraces of Christianity; which have bid the fairest of any one contrivance, to overturn the certainty of the miracles of Christ, and the whole truth of the gospel, by putting them all on the same foot." * To destroy the authority there- fore of these cheats, was to sap the foundation of Popery, and overturn the main pillar on which its power subsists : which was the real motive of my dwelling longer on this than on any other article, as our Catholic observes, as well as of treating it with that freedom which alarmed even some of our protestants. That my sentiments therefore on this head may neither be mistaken, nor suspected ; and that I may give satisfaction, as far as I am able, to all, whom, by any freedom of expression, I may possibly have offended, either in this, or in any other of my writings, I take this occasion to declare ; that I look upon miracles, when ac- companied with all the circumstances proper to persuade us of the reality of the facts said to be performed, and of the dignity of the end for which they were performed, to be the most de- cisive proofs that can be given, of the truth and divinity of any religion. This was evidently the case of the Jewish and of the Christian mir- acles ; wrought in such a manner as could leave * Sec Leslie's Short Method with the Deists, p. 24. 14 158 middleton's defence of no doubt upon the senses of those who were the witnesses of them ; and for the noblest end, for which the Deity can be conceived to interpose himself; the universal good and salvation of man. For the Jewish and Christian dispensa- tions are but different parts of one and the same scheme; mutually illustrating and confirming each others authority: and from this view of them, in which they should always be consid- ered, as necessarily connected, and dependent on each other, we see the weakness of that ob- jection, commonly made to the Mosaic part, on the account of its being calculated for the use only of a peculiar people ; whereas in truth, it was the beginning, or first opening of an uni- versal system ; which, from the time of Moses, was gradually manifested to the world by the successive missions of the prophets, till that ful- ness of time or coming of the Messiah, when life and immortality were brought to light by the gospel, or the chief good and happiness of man perfectly revealed to him. That miracles have ever been thought the most authentic proofs of a divine mission, seems to be declared by the sense of all nations : since there never was a religion pretending to be di- vine, which did not support that pretension by an appeal to them : yet the innumerable forger- ies of this sort, which have been imposed upon mankind in all ages, are so far from weakening the credibility of the Jewish and Christian mir- acles, that they strengthen it. For how could we account for a practice so universal, of forging THE LETTER FROM ROME. 159 miracles for the support of false religions, if on some occasions they had not actually been wrought for the confirmation of a true one? Or how is it possible, that so many spurious copies should pass upon the world, without some genuine original, from which they were drawn; whose known existence and tried success might give an appearance of probability to the coun- terfeit? Now of all the miracles of antiquity, there are none that can pretend to the character of originals, but those of the Old and New Tes- tament ; which though the oldest by far, of all others, of which any monuments now remain in the world, have yet maintained their credit to this day, through the perpetual opposition and scrutiny of ages ; whilst all the rival productions of fraud and craft have long ago been succes- sively exploded, and sunk into utter contempt. An event that cannot reasonably be ascribed to any other cause but to the natural force and ef- fect of truth, which, though defaced for a time by the wit, or depressed by the power of man, is sure still to triumph in the end, over all the false mimicry of art, and the vain efforts of hu- man policy. As to Mr. Leslie's rules of distinguishing the true from false miracles, I have lately perused and considered them ; and whatever force they may be supposed to have, I would not advise an apologist for Christianity to trust his cause to that single issue. Mr. Leslie himself does not do it ; but suggests several other arguments for the divinity of our religion, so strong and con- 160 middleton's defence of elusive that even miracles themselves, as he de- clares, would not be sufficient to overrule them.* His marks, however, are so far certainly good, that no pretence of miracles can deserve any at- tention without them ; yet it does not necessarily follow that all the miracles in which they may be found, ought to be received as true ; since as far as I have been able to observe, within the compass of my reading, several might be pro- duced both from Popery and Paganism, which seem to possess them all, and are yet unques- tionably false. I have charged the Popish church in my letter with many instances of forged miracles, to which this author does not think fit to make any par- ticular reply, but contents himself with a general answer, which must needs be thought curious: for he observes, that whether the miracles which I have pitched upon be true or false, there is no- thing at least heathenish in them ; and conse- quently nothing that shows the conformity, which I pretend to demonstrate, between Popery and Paganism. Which is in effect to say, that allowing them to be forged, yet they were not forged by Pagan, but by Christian priests ; not for the purposes of Pagan, but of Christian su- perstition, so that I cannot with any propriety call them heathenish. But are they not all copied from the patterns of Paganism? Are they not applied to the same purposes of fraud and delusion ; to keep their people in a slavish subjection to an idolatrous worship ; and to ac- * See Leslie's Short method, p. 21. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 161 quire wealth and power to the priesthood ? This certainly is downright Paganism, and the most detestable part of it. He proceeds however to assert with his usual gravity, "that God has been pleased in every age, to work most evident miracles in their church, by the ministry of his saints ; in raising the dead to life ; in curing the blind and the lame ; in casting out devils ; in healing invete- rate diseases in a moment, attested by the most authentic monuments ; which will be a standing evidence to all nations, that the church in which they are wrought, is not that idolatrous Pagan church which I pretend it to be, but the true spouse of Christ." This is the constant voice of all the Romish apologists; that the Catholicism of their church is demonstrated by the notoriety of their miracles.* But since the end of all mir- acles is to convert unbelievers ; if their miracles be really wrought by the power of Christ, why are they not wrought, like the miracles of Christ, in open daylight ; in the midst of unbelieving nations ; not for the acquisition of gain or power to particular persons, but for the benevolent ends of conferring some general good, by reforming men's lives, enlightening their understandings, and promoting truth and peace and charity amongst men? Why are none of them wrought in protestant countries, for whose conversion * Nostram Ecclesiam demonstrabimus esse vcram Ecclesi- am miraculis. Bellarm. cle Eccles. Milit. L. iv. c. 14. " We will prove our church to be the true church by mira- cles." (Cited from Cardinal Bellar mine.) — [D.] 14* 1G2 middleton's defence of they are always alleged; but huddled over among their own bigoted votaries: prepared by an habitual credulity, to receive any imposture that their priests can invent ?* While St. Thomas's shrine flourished atCan- terbury, his saintship was demonstrated by per- petual miracles; in which, as the historians of those times tell us, he far outdid not only all other saints, but even our Saviour himself. There were two volumes of them preserved in the church of Canterbury ; and another book in France, in which there was an account of two hundred and seventy. Peter of Blois, a celebra- ted writer of that age, after drawing a parallel between Thomas the apostle, and Thomas the martyr, says, ' ; I do not pretend to compare a martyr with an apostle ; for an apostle is greater ; * M. de Marolles takes occasion to observe, from a fact which happened in Paris, 1644, how easily people, possessed with a superstitious regard to miracles, can persuade themselves that they see what in truth has no existence. The story is this : a cer- tain man, out of a mere whim, or with design perhaps to try his pistol, shot it off against a sign in the street, on which the Vir- gin Mary was painted. The neighborhood being alarmed, ran out to see what was the matter; and observing the Virgin to be pierced through with the bullet, conceived it to be done by some heretic or blasphemer, in open defiance of their religion, and amazed at so daring an impiety, fancied that they saw drops of blood issue from the wound : of which the whole multitude was so strongly convinced, that there were thousands ready to depose that they had seen it with their own eyes : the story be- came famous, and a copper-plate of it was printed ; till being ridiculed by men of sense, and found to be wholly imaginary, the copper-plate was ordered to be suppressed, and the miracle fell gradually into contempt. But if it had not happened in a country where the protestants at that time were very numerous, it might have been stamped perhaps for as genuine a miracle as many others of the same coinage, which I have taken notice of in the present work. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 163 but it is glorious for us to have a martyr, who bears the name of an apostle, and who equals or surpasses him in his miracles.* That great apos- tle cannot take it amiss that the Holy Spirit should enable others to work greater wonders, and in greater number than him : since the Lord both of the apostles and martyrs is content to be outdone by them himself in this particular : ye shall do, says he, not only these works, that I do ; but greater works than these shall ye do." f Which prediction, as they declare, was literally * John of Salisbury, who lived at the time, with a great re- putation of learning and integrity, and wrote Becket's life, whose friend and disciple he was, speaking of the place and manner of his burial, says, " Where to the glory of God many and great miracles are now wrought by him, the people flocking thither in crowds, that they may see in others, and feel also in themselves, the power and mercy of him, who is ever wonderful and glorious in his saints. For in the place on which he suf- fered, and where his body likewise was deposited that night before the great altar ; and also where he was at last buried, the paralytic are healed; the blind see; the deaf hear ; the dumb speak ; the lame walk ; the devils are cast out ; all who are sick of fevers, or other diseases, are cured ; and what was never heard of in the days of our fathers, the dead are raised. See Vit. S. Tliomcz Epistolis prcefix. Vol. i. 142." Pope Alexander, the third of that name, in a letter to the church of Canterbury upon the subject of Thomas's canoniza- tion, about four years after his death, says, — the whole body of the faithful must necessarily rejoice to hear of the wonderful works of the holy and reverend man Thomas, your late arch- bishop. But you must needs be filled with a more exalted joy, who behold his miracles with your own eyes, and whose church has the peculiar honor of possessing his most sacred remains. We on our part having considered the glory of his merits, by which his life was made so illustrious, and having received full and certain information of his miracles, not only from common fame, but from the testimony of our beloved sons, Albertus and Theoduinus, cardinal priests and apostolic legats, and of a great number of other persons, have solemnly canonized the afore- said archbishop, &c. lb. p. 170. t John xiv. 12. 164 middleton's defence of fulfilled by St. Thomas: '-Whose blood being collected with care immediately after his death, not only cured all distempers, but raised even great numbers of the dead to life : and when the quantity was foun 1 insufficient for the demand that was made of it, they were forced to supply it with water : the least drop of which, when ged with the martyr's blood, and administered to the sick, or infused into the mouths of the dead, had all the same effects: so that it was sent abroad into all parts of the Christian world as an infallible cure for all kinds of disease-. The fame oi these miracles drew kings and princes from abroad : and infinite crowds at home, with daily offerings to his shrine: but this harvest was no sooner over, than the power of the saint fell with the gain of the pri>. and all his i - ceased, when the honor of his altar stood most in need of their support : so that the place where he was formerly worship- ped, and where such mighty wonders were once wrought " shown as a monument only of the folly and superstition of our ancestors. But though he works no miracles in England, where his bones lie deposited ; he works them still in foreign countries, and will continue to do so. as long as there is a Popish church and a priest- hood, who find their interest in supporting them. For. as Lac:antius justly observes. - among those who seek power and gain from their religion, there will never be wanting an inclination to forge and to lie for it."'~ * La vie i: $:.Th:rr. r.D. t Lactan. defals.relig. i. 1 THE LETTER FROM ROME. 165 They tell us indeed of many miracles of the greatest kind, wrought by their missionaries in India : but they all rest upon no other authority than the suspected relations of those missiona- ries; and are even contradicted by some of their gravest writers. A royal professor of Salamanca, in one of his public lectures, says, u it does not appear to me, that the Christian faith has been propounded to the Indians in such a man- ner as would reasonably induce them to receive it ; for I hear of no miracles performed amongst them, nor of such examples of the Christian life as there ought to be ; but on the contrary, of much scandal and impiety." Another learned Jesuit, who had spent many years among the Indians, in a treatise on the method of convert- ing them, says, c; What signifies all our preach- ing? What stress can we lay upon it? We work no miracles."* But among all the boasted miracles of these missionaries, they have never so much as pre- tended to the gift of tongues ; which is the first thing necessary to the conversion of barbarous nations; and without which all their preaching, and even miracles themselves would be useless. Yet St. Xaverius himself, the apostle of the In- dies, and one of their great saints and workers of miracles, laments, in several of his letters, the insuperable difficulties which he had to struggle with in his mission, and his incapacity of doing any good in those countries, for the want of this gift. And in Japan particularly, where, accord- * Hospinian de Origin. Jesuitar. p. 230. 166 middleton's defence of ing to his account a plentiful harvest was open to him, and great numbers disposed to be- come Christians; "God grant," says he, "that I may soon learn their language, so as to be able to explain things divine, and do some service at last to the Christian cause. For at present in- deed, I am nothing better than a statue among them ; and while they are talking and inquiring many things about me, am quite dumb through my ignorance of their tongue: but I am now acting the boy again in learning the elements of it."* Sir Thomas Roe, in a letter to the archbishop of Canterbury from the court of the great Mogul, relates a fact very applicable to our present sub- ject ; " that the Jesuit's house and church in that country happening to be burnt, the crucifix re- mained untouched, which was given out as a miracle. The king called for the Jesuit, and questioned him about it ; but he answered am- biguously. The king then asked, whether he did not desire to convert him ; and being an- swered in the affirmative, replied, You speak of your great miracles, and of many done in the name of your Prophet ; if you will cast the cru- cifix into a fire before me, and it does not burn, I will become a Christian. The Jesuit refused * Itaque cum neque ilii meam, neque ego illorum linguam intelligerem, &c. Xaverii. Epist. L. v. Sane laboriosum est, eorum, quibuscum verseris, funditus ignorare sermonem. lb. i. 14. Faxit Deus, lit ad divinarum explicationem rerum, Ja- ponicam linguam condiscamus quam primum. Turn demum aliquam Christiana? rei navabimus operam. Nam nunc qui- dem inter eos tanquam mutae quaedam statuae versamur, &c. lb. L. iii. 5. THE LETTER FROM ROME. 167 the trial as unjust ; answering that God was not tied to the call of man ; that it was a sin to tempt him ; and that he wrought miracles according to his own will; yet he offered to cast himself into the fire, as a proof of his own faith, which the king would not allow. Upon this, there arose a great dispute, begun by the Prince ; a stiff Mahometan, and hater of Christians ; who urged that it was reasonable to try our religion after this manner ; but withal, that if the cruci- fix did burn, then the Jesuit should be obliged to turn Moor. He alleged examples also of mir- acles said to be wrought for less purposes than the conversion of so mighty a king ; and spoke scornfully of Jesus Christ." Yet nothing could move the Jesuit to expose the authority of his religion to the hazard of so dangerous a trial.* But as in the case of all beneficial impostures, the security of the managers is apt to push them at last to an extravagance that betrays the whole cheat, so it has happened in the affair of the Po- pish miracles ; which have been carried to such a height of impudence and absurdity as renders them wholly contemptible; while all their greater saints, and especially the founders of the monas- tic orders, St. Francis, St. Dominic, &c, are pre- ferred, not only to the apostles, but to Christ himself, for the number and importance of their miracles; many of which are authorized by the bulls of Popes, condemning all as heretics who do not believe them : though they are all pre- * Sec Collection of Travels published by Churchill, p. 805, 606. 168 middleton's defence of tended to be wrought for no other end but the propagation of enthusiasm and monkery, and the confirmation of certain doctrines and rites, which are not only useless, but apparently hurt- ful to mankind. If any such miracles therefore were ever wrought, of which there is the greatest reason to doubt, we must necessarily ascribe them to the power of the devil : endeavoring by such de- lusions to draw men away from the worship of the true God. This we are warranted to think probable, by the principles of our religion, and the authority of the primitive fathers ; who ex- hort us on all such occasions to try the miracles by their end and tendency, and the nature of that doctrine which is proposed to be established by them : for though miracles carry the strong- est presumption, as I have said, of the divinity of a doctrine in whose favor they are alleged, yet they are intended chiefly to rouse the atten- tion of the world to the preacher or prophet who pretends to perform them, that his commission may be openly examined, whether it be of God or not. The Jesuit Maldonatus, in his Comment on Matt. vii. 22, observes, "That St. Chrysostom, Jerom, Euthemius, Theophylact, prove by sev- eral instances, that real miracles had been per- formed by those who were not Catholic Chris- tians." St. Chrysostom declares, " that miracles are proper only to excite sluggish and vulgar minds; that men of sense have no occasion for them; and that they frequently carry some un- THE LETTER FROM ROME. 169 toward suspicion along with them." * " We are to take notice," says St. Jerom, " that some are said to have the gifts of the Spirit who do not hold the truth of the gospel, which may serve to si- lence those heretics, who if they can but work a miracle, fancy presently that they have demon- strated the truth of their faith." t " If miracles," says St. Austin, "are wrought in the Catholic church, its Catholicism is not thereby manifested, because miracles are wrought in it ; but the mir- acles themselves are to be received because they are wrought in a church that is Catholic." And Theodoret tells us, "that we are commanded not to give credit to them, when the performers of them teach things contrary to true piety." t If agreeably then to the injunctions of the apostles and primitive fathers, we sit down to examine the pretended miracles of Rome, we shall find them always the most numerous, and the most confidently attested, in proportion to the absurdity of the doctrine or practice in whose favor they are alleged ; as in the case of tran- substantiation, purgatory, the worship of images, relics, crucifixes, indulgences, and all the tricks of monkery ; as if miracles were of no other use but to subvert the reason and senses of mankind and confound all the distinctions between right and wrong: but if there be any rule of judging of their reality, or any power in man to discern truth from falsehood, we must necessarily con- * Vide Chrysost. Oper. Edit. Benedict. T. v. 271 ; a. 376 ; b. T. viii. 296 ; a. 205, 455. t Vid. Hieron. in Galat. iii. Oper. T. iv. p. 251. Edit. Bened. 1 Vid. Hospin. de doctrina Jesuit, p. 388. 15 170 dleton's defence of elude, from the nature and end of the Popish miracles, that whatever testimonies may he brought to support them, they were all, without exception, either wrought by wicked spirits, or forged by wicked men. § 14. Conclusion. — I have now run through every thing that seemed worthy of any notice in my adversary's preface ; where I have the sat- isfaction to observe, that though he accuses me so freely of slander and falsehood, yet he has not denied so much as one of the numerous facts on which I ground my charge of their Paganism. It was upon the strength of these facts, that I first offered my letter to the judgment of the pub- lic, and the favorable reception which it has met with shows that it is not thought trifling, and foreign to the purpose, as he affirms it to be ; but pertinent and decisive of the question which it professes to illustrate. It is a folly therefore to attack the credit of it, till he comes prepared to overthrow the facts on which it is built ; for while these are allowed to be firm, the inference is undeniable, "that Popery has borrowed its principal ceremonies and doctrines from the rit- uals of Paganism." The truth of this charge is so evident to all, who know any thing of antiquity, that though a missionary, as we may imagine, would be glad to conceal it even from Papists, and much more from Protestants, whom he is endeavoring to convert, yet all their own writers, who have any candor and learning, make no scruple to ac- knowledge it. M. de Marolles informs us how THE LETTER FROM ROME. 171 he once surprised a great archbishop of France, by a frank declaration of it : which he after- wards demonstrated to him at large, by a par- ticular deduction of it through many of the same instances on which I have insisted in my letter.* The learned Du Choul also thus concludes his book on the religion of the old Romans : " If we consider the case attentively, we shall find very many institutions of our religion to have been borrowed from the ceremonies of the Egyptians and the Gentiles — all which our priests now make use of in our mysteries, by referring to the only true God, Jesus Christ, what the ignorance, false religion, and senseless superstition of the Pagans had applied to their gods, and to mortal men after their consecration." t Our Catholic however concludes his work in a very different style : and in a kind of triumph for an imagined victory, undertakes by my own way of reasoning, to demonstrate the same con- formity between the English and Roman church which I have attempted to show between Popery and Paganism ; from the number of observances which our church still retains from the old re- ligion of Rome : in consequence of which, he says, u if my argument be right, our Protestancy at last will be found to be nothing better than heathenish idolatry." But if we recollect the definition which I have given above, of Popery, the question will be reduced to a short issue ; by considering only whether any of those particu- * Memoircs de Marolles, par. ii. p. 209. t De religione Vetcr. Romanor. ad fin. 172 middleton's defence of lars which prove their religion to be Paganish, are retained still in ours ; whether we have any incense, holy water, or lamps in our churches any votive offerings hanging round our pillars any miraculous images ; any adoration of saints any altars in the streets, the waysides, and tops of hills : any processions; miracles, or monkery amongst us : if after all our reformation, we re- tain any of these, we are so far undoubtedly as criminal as they ; but if none of them can be found upon us, we are clear at least from all that Pagan idolatry which glares out so manifestly from every part of the Popish worship. All that he can object to us on this head, amounts to no more than this : " that there are several observances retained in our sacred offices which we use in common with the church of Rome." We own it : but take them all to be such as we may retain with innocence. We profess to retain all that is truly Christian ; all that is enjoined by the gospel, or by just inference de- ducible from it. But if besides all this, they can discover any thing amongst us that they can claim as their own, or that may properly be called Popish ; I should willingly resign it to them; and consent to any expedient that may remove us farther still from Popery, and unite us more closely with all sober Protestants. But whether any thing of this sort be remaining in our present establishment ; or how far any of the instances which he declares to have been borrowed from Rome, may want a review or far- ther reformation, as it is not the part of a pri- THE LETTER FROM ROME. 173 vate man to determine, so I shall refer it, as I ought, to the judgment of my superiors. But it is high time to put an end to the reader's trouble, to which I shall beg leave only to add the fol- lowing anonymous letter, which has some rela- tion to my present subject, and was sent to me by the post, while I was employed on the life of Cicero. "Sir, — You are desired by one of your sub- scribers, instead of amusing yourself with wri- ting the life of Cicero, to answer the Catholic Christian, written (as the author declares) in an- swer to, and in order to show your false reason- ings in your comparison of the Popish and Pa- gan ceremonies of religion — this Catholic Chris- tian abuses the Protestant religion, taxes its di- vines with false translations and quotations out of Scripture, which he pretends they do not un- derstand, or misapply, to make out their own heretical doctrines. Such scandalous reproaches brought upon yourself, and also upon the Pro- testant religion by your writings, make it incum- bent on you to wipe off these stains, which by your means are contracted, before you enter up- on any other subject. "lam yours, &c." "P. S. It had been honesterand fairer to have answered the book, than to have complained to the bishop of London against the printer and got him put into prison." I do not know how far my unknown corres- pondent will think himself obliged to me for 15* 174 middleton's defence of performing the task that he prescribes, of defend- ing my letter from Rome, from the cavils of the Catholic Christian: I am in hopes, however, that my pains may be of some use, as well to admonish all serious Papists of the fraud and foppery of their own worship, as to deter Protes- tants from running over to a church so notori- ously corrupt and heathenish. As to the charge intimated in the postscript, of procuring the im- prisonment of the printer, instead of answering the author, it would have left indeed a just re- proach upon me, if there had been any truth in it ; but if any man has been imprisoned, or put to any trouble, on the account of that book, I de- clare that I am an utter stranger to it ; that I have not the honor to be known to the bishop of London ; and that no personal provocation what- soever could induce me to desire the imprison- ment of any man for the sake of his religion. My aversion to Popery is grounded, not only on its Paganism and idolatry, but on its being calculated for the support of despotic power, and inconsistent with the genius of a free gov- ernment. This I take to be its real character; which I do not however extend to the particular professors of it ; many of whom I know to be men of great probity, politeness, and humanity; who through the prejudice of education, do not either see the consequences of what they are trained to profess, or through a mistaken point of honor, think it a duty to adhere to the religion of their ancestors. With these I can live, not only in charity, but in friendship ; without the THE LETTER FROM ROME. 175 least inclination to offend them any farther, than by obstructing all endeavors to introduce a reli- gion amongst us which would necessarily be ruinous to the liberty of our country. Thus much I thought myself obliged to say upon the occasion of the foregoing letter, that while the Papists look upon me as an enemy, they may consider me at least as a fair one ; an enemy to the idolatrous and slavish principles of their church ; but free from all prejudice or enmity to their persons. APPENDIX A.— Page 97. ST. JANUARIUS AND THE FRENCH GENERAL. An amusing circumstance occurred in connection with this pretended miracle of the melting of the blood of St. Januarius, at the time of the invasion of Italy by the troops of Napoleon Bonaparte. In order to excite the populace of Naples against the French, the Popish priests, through the medium of the confessional, and in other ways, had contrived to circulate the impression among the people, that St. Januarius was incensed against the foreign in- vaders, and that the phial of blood would show the anger of the Saint, by refusing to liquify. On the appointed day, the blood was exposed as on former occasions to the adoration of the multitude, but true to the predictions of the priests, the Saint was angry, and the blood remained congealed. The supersti- tious multitude, unsuspicious of the imposture prac- tised on them by their priests, and deprived of their expected miracle, were upon the point of rising en masse upon the impious French, who had so deeply offended their Saint. 178 APPENDIX A. The French commander, hereupon, planted can- non before the church of St. Januarius, and troops of soldiers in the principal streets. Having station- ed cannoneers, with lighted matches ready to fire them at the word of command, he then issued a spe- cial order to the priests in charge of the miraculous phial of blood, that if in ten minutes the Saint did not repent of his obstinacy, and perform his usual miracle, the church should be fired upon, and the city should be reduced to ruins. It was a critical moment. Five minutes of the precious ten had passed away, and the Saint yet con- tinued obstinate. The cannoneers were just ready to advance with their matches, the multitude were looking on in anxious expectation, when (mirabile dictu!) the Saint relented just in time, and the blood was seen to melt ! The multitude rent the air with their shouts. The church, the image, and the blood of the Saint were spared for future exhibitions ; and the priests returned to their homes mortified and cha- grined at having, at least once in their lives, been compelled to perform their well-practised jugglery in spite of themselves. APPENDIX B.— Page 107. RESEMBLANCE BETWEEN MODERN PAGANISM AND POPERY. BY REV. EUGENIO KINCAID. The following striking parallel between the sys- tem of modern Paganism which prevails in the Bur- man Empire, called Bhoodism, and Popery, was communicated to the editor by the Rev. Eugenio Kincaid, for thirteen years a most useful and suc- cessful missionary in Burmah, in reply to a letter of inquiry on this subject. " Dear Bro. Dowling — In answer to your letter making inquiries relative to the resemblances which I had observed between Bhoodism and Popery, while laboring as a missionary in Burmah, I would reply as follows : " Bhoodism prevails over all Burmah, Siam, the Shan Principalities, and about one-third of the Chi- nese empire. Gaudama was the last Bhood, or the last manifestation of Bhood, and his relics and im- ages are the objects of supreme adoration over all Bhoodist countries. In passing through the great cities of Burmah, the traveller is struck with the number and grandeur of the temples, pagodas and monasteries, as also with the number of idols and shaven-headed priests. 180 APPENDIX B. Worship of images , relics, and saints * — " Pago- das are solid structures of masonry, and are wor- shipped because within their bare walls are deposit- ed images or relics of Gaudama. The temples are dedicated to the worship of Gaudama ; in them thrones are erected, on which massy images of Gau- dama are placed ; in some of the larger temples are the images of five hundred primitive disciples who were canonized about the time or soon after the death of Gaudama. Bhoodist monasteries. — " The monasteries are the abode of the priests, and the depositories of the sa- cred volumes, with their endless scholia and com- mentaries. These monasteries are the schools and colleges of the empire. They are open to all the boys of the kingdom, rich and poor. No provision is made for the education of girls. Bhoodist monks with shaven heads. — Vow of cell- bacy, 8fC. — " Priests are monks, as monasticism is universal ; they take the vow of poverty and celi- bacy — their heads shaved and without turbans, and, dressed in robes of yellow cloth, they retire from society, or, in the language of their order, retire to the wilderness. Henceforth, they are always ad- dressed as lords or saints, and over the entire popu- lation they exert a despotic influence. Priests, dead and alive, are worshipped the same as idols * These titles in italics, by which the various parts of the article are distinguished, have been added to Mr. Kincaid's let- ter by the editor. APPENDIX B. 161 and pagodas, because they are saints, and have ex- traordinary merit. Bhoodist rosaries. Prayers in an unknown tongue. — " All devout Bhoodists, whether priests or people, male or female, use a string of leads, or rosary, in the recitation of their prayers — and their prayers are in the unknown tongue, called Pali, a language that has ceased to be spoken for many hundred years, and was never the vernacular of Burmah. Acts of merit. — " The frequent repetition of prayers with the rosary, fasting, and making offer- ings to the images are meritorious deeds. Celibacy and voluntary poverty is regarded as evidence of the most exalted piety. To build temples, pagodas and monasteries, and purchase idols, are meritorious acts. Burning of wax candles in the daytime. — " The burning of wax tapers and candles of various colors, both day and night, around the shrines of Gaudama, is universal in Bhoodist countries, and is taught as highly meritorious. Social prayer is unknown — each one prays apart, and making various prostra- tions before the images, deposits upon the altar of- ferings of fruit and flowers. The Bhoodist Lent. — Priests confessing each other. — " The priests are required to fast every day after the sun has passed the meridian till the next morn- ing. Besides this, there is a great fast once a year, continuing four or five weeks, in which all the peo- 16 182 APPENDIX B. pie are supposed to live entirely on vegetables and fruits. During this great fast, the priests retire from their monasteries, and live in temporary booths or tents, and are supposed to give themselves more exclusively to an ascetic life. At a certain time in the year, the priests have a practice of confessing and exorcising each other. This takes place in a small building erected for the purpose over running water. The Bhoodist priesthood and Pope. — " There are various grades of rank in the priesthood, and the most unequivocal submission in the lower to the higher orders is required. Tha-iha-na-bing is the title of the priest who sits on the highest ecclesiasti- cal throne in the empire (and thus corresponds to the Pope among Romanists). He is Primate, or Lord Archbishop of the realm — receives his appoint- ment from the King ; and from the Tha-tha-na-bing (or Pope) emanate all other ecclesiastical appoint- ments in the kingdom, and its tributary principali- ties. He lives in a monastery built and furnished by the King, which is as splendid as gold and silver can make it. Bhoodist defences against idolatry the same as the excuses of Romanists for the worship of images. — " I should observe that intelligent, learned Bhoodists (like some Romanists) deny that they worship the images and relics of Gaudama, but only venerate them as objects that remind them of Gaudama, the APPENDIX B. 183 only object of supreme adoration — but the number of Bhoodists who make this distinction is very small. Striking resemblance between the worship of a Bhoodist temple and a Roman Catholic cathedral. — " Often, when standing in a great Burman temple, and looking round upon a thousand worshippers pros- trating themselves before images, surrounded by wax candles, uttering prayers in a dead language, each one with a rosary in hand, and the priests with long, flowing robes and shaven heads, I have thought of what I have witnessed in the Roman Catholic Ca- thedral in Montreal, and it has required but a very small stretch of the imagination to suppose myself transported to the opposite side of the globe, looking not upon the ceremonies of an acknowledged hea- then temple, but upon the Christianized heathenism of Rome. " The above are the points of resemblance be- tween Bhoodism and Popery, which have struck my own mind the most powerfully. A pressure of en- gagements must be my apology for the brief, and I fear imperfect manner in which I have endeavored to comply with your request. Wishing you abun- dant success in your efforts to advance the interests of Bible truth and genuine Protestantism, "I remain " Yours in gospel bonds, " EUGENIO KlNCAID." APPENDIX C— Page 109. TEMPORIZING POLICY OF THE JESUIT MISSIONARIES IN CHINA. In relation to this principle of accommodation, re- ferred to by Dr. Middleton, as adopted by the Jesuits in their missions to the heathen, the following two extracts may not be unacceptable to the reader. The first is from a recent valuable little work on the Jesuits, by the Rev. R. W. Overbury, minister of Eagle-street Chapel, London. The second from an able article in the Christian Review for June, 1841, on " The Jesuits as a Missionary Order/' from the pen of one of the profoundest scholars and most eloquent writers of the present day. " The Jesuits," says Mr. Overbury, " at a very early period established missions in the Celestial Empire. It was whilst projecting this mission that Francis Xavier fell ill and died. In reply to those who represented to him the difficulties of the under- taking, he had said : ' I am chosen for so high an enterprise by the special favor of heaven. * * * The die is cast, I wish to go to China, and nothing can change my design. Were all hell let loose, I would scorn it, provided heaven were favorable to me.' At this time, however, some untoward events took place, which threw him into a fewer, of which he died in fifteen days, in the forty-sixth year of his APPENDIX C. 185 age, having spent the last ten years in his Indian expedition. " What Xavier thus vainly designed, was attempt- ed by other hands. To give ever so brief a sketch of the Jesuit missions in China, would occupy too much time. The following letter, however, from the Roman Catholic Bishop Palafox to Pope Inno- cent X., dated January 8th, 1649, may be relied on as giving a just representation of the proceedings of the Jesuits in that country. < The whole church/ says he, ' publicly laments that it has been rather seduced than edified in China, by what the Jesuits have taught respecting the faith. They have kept the cross out of sights and authorized customs abso- lutely Pagan. Instead of Christianizing idolaters, they have heathenized Christians ; they have united God and Belial at the same table, in the same tem- ple, at the same altar, and in the same sacrifices. In fact, idols are worshipped in that nation under the mask of Christianity, or rather the purity of our holy faith is polluted under the mask of idolatry. They have not only permitted the new converts to frequent the temples where idols are adored, but to take part in the abominable sacrifices which are of- fered to them ; nay, they themselves offer sacrifices to the idols, prostrate themselves before them, pre- sent incense to them, and erect the cross on the same temple as Dagon, — such rites being evaded by a pretext of the Jesuits, directing the inward at- tention of the worshipper to a cross which is carried in secret, at the same time that their exterior wor- ship is offered to the idol.' No ecclesiastical order ever deviated so widely from the principles of the Christian religion. Instead of teaching the new converts, as they ought, the new converts have in- 16* 186 APPENDIX C. veigled their teachers into idolatry, and have in- duced them to embrace a worship and customs that are detestable ; so that the fish has not been taken by the angler, but the angler has been caught by the fish. ' As I am nearer to this people,' (the Chi- nese,) says the Bishop, ' than any other prelate ; as I have not only received letters from their instruct- ors, but am acquainted with all the facts of the case, and am in possession of all the documents that have appeared upon it, and as in the character of bishop, God has called me to the government of his church, I should have cause to tremble at the awful day of judgment, if having his spiritual sheep committed to my care, I had not represented to your highness how many scandals are occasioned by this doctrine of the Jesuits in places where the true faith alone should be propagated.' " * " Another remarkable feature in the Jesuit order, illustrated in the history of all their missions," says the writer in the Christian Review, " was their fa- tal principle of accommodation, — one in the use of which they alternately triumphed and fell. The gospel is to be presented with no needless offence given to the prejudices and habits of the heathen, but the gospel itself is never to be mutilated or dis- guised ; nor is the ministry ever to stoop to compli- ances in themselves sinful. The Jesuit mistook or forgot this. From a very early period, the order were famed for the art with which they studied to accommodate themselves and their religion to the tastes of the nation they would evangelize. Ricci, on entering China, found the bonzes, the priests of * The Jesuits, by R. W. Overbury, page 135, &c. London : Houlston & Stoneman. 1846. APPENDIX C. 187 the nation ; and to secure respect, himself and his associates adopted the habits and dress of the bon- zes. But a short acquaintance with the empire taught him, that the whole class of the priesthood was in China a despised one, and that he had been only attracting gratuitous odium in assuming their garb. He therefore relinquished it again, to take that of the men of letters. In India, some of their number adopted the Braminical dress, and others conformed to the disgusting habits of the Fakeer and the Yogee, the hermits and penitents of the Moham- medan and Hindoo superstition. Swartz met a Catholic missionary, arrayed in the style of the Pa- gan priests, wearing their yellow robe, and having like them a drum beaten before him. It would seem, upon such principles of action, as if their next step ought to have been the creation of a Christian Juggernaut ; or to have arranged the Christian sut- tee, where the widow might burn according to the forms of the Romish breviary ; or to have organized a band of Romanist Thugs, strangling in the name of the Virgin, as did their Hindoo brethren for the honor of Kalee. " In South America, one of the zealous Jesuit fath- ers, finding that the Payernes, as the sorcerers and priests of the tribe were called, were accustomed to dance and sing in giving their religious instructions, put his preachments into metre, arm copied the move- ments of these Pagan priests, that he might win the savage by the forms to which he had been accus- tomed. In China, again, they found the worship of deceased ancestors generally prevailing. Failing to supplant the practice, they proceeded to legitimate it. They even allowed worship to be paid to Con- fucius, the atheistical philosopher of China, provided 188 APPENDIX C. their converts would, in offering the worship, con- ceal upon the altar a crucifix to which their homage should he secretly directed. Finding the adoration of a crucified Saviour unpopular among that self- sufficient people, they are accused by their own Ro- manist brethren of having suppressed in their teach- ings the mystery of the cross, and preached Christ glorified, but not Christ in his humiliation, his agony, and his death. A more arrogant act than this the wisdom of this world has seldom perpetrated, when it has undertaken to modify and adorn the gospel of the crucified Nazarene. "But to Robert de Nobilibus, the nephew of Bel- larmine, and the near kinsman of one of the pontiffs, a man of distinguished talent and zeal, laboring in India, it was reserved to exhibit one of the worst instances of this fatal spirit. Finding the Bramins in possession of the spiritual power, he published abroad that the Bramins of Rome were the kindred, but the seniors and the superiors of those of India. Enmity may have charged him falsely, in declaring that he forged deeds, in which a direct descent was claimed for these Western Bramins from Brama himself, the chief god of Hindoo idolatry ; but it is certain, that in this or some other mode he made the new faith so popular, that twelve, or as some accounts state, seventy of the Indian Bramins be- came his coadjutors ; and after his death, with the collusion of the Portuguese priests, the new sect went on still triumphing. But even the Romish see repudiated such conversions as these ; and a bull from the Vatican extinguished the next communion. To this same able but treacherous laborer belongs the fame of another kindred achievement. He com- posed in the language of the country a treatise in APPENDIX C. 189 favor of Christianity. The work had the title of the Ezour Vedam. It was intended to sap the skep- ticism of the East ; but so covertly, though with much ability, did it undertake the task, that having been translated and reaching France, where it fell into the hands of Voltaire, he pounced upon it as an ancient Braminical treatise, full of oriental wisdom, and proving that Christianity had borrowed its chief doctrines from Eastern sources. Thus, while labor- ing to destroy unbelief in India, he became in the next century instrumental in aiding its progress in Europe. The Jesuit, caught in his own snare, was made from his grave to lend weapons to the scoffer ; while the arch-mocker, the patriarch of French in- fidelity, entangled in the toils of that wilful credu- lity which has distinguished so many eminent unbe- lievers, quoted the work of modern Jesuitism as an undoubted monument of ancient Braminism. Thus are the wise taken in their own craftiness, when in their self-confidence they undertake either to pa- tronize or to impugn the gospel of the Nazarene. "We need scarcely to name another defect of the Jesuit missions, which must have occurred to all. Their fatal neglect of the Scriptures. Even Xavier translated into Japanese but the creed, the Lord's Prayer, and a brief catechism, and afterwards a Life of the Saviour, compiled from the gospels. The Lives of the Saints afterwards appeared in that lan- guage. In the tongue of China the Jesuits acquired such proficiency as to become voluminous authors, writing, it is said, hundreds of books ; but although they translated the ponderous Sum of Theology of Thomas Aquinas into Chinese, the Scriptures seem to have been thought a needless or dangerous book, and a compend of the gospel history was, we believe, 190 APPENDIX C. their chief work in the form of scriptural translation. With no religious light but that emanating from the altar and pulpit, their churches were, when persecu- tion veiled these, left in thick darkness. The Je- suits, anxious to shut up their converts into a safe and orthodox submission, seem to have preferred this fearful risk, to the peril of leaving the lively or- acles to beam forth their living brightness upon the minds of their people. Hence the Catholics, linger- ing still in the Celestial Empire, and their Indian neophytes in Paraguay and California, have proba- bly never known, scarce even by name, those Scrip- tures which are the rightful heritage of every Chris- tian. Nor, for their own use, even, did their mis- sionaries prize the Bible aright. Does the Jesuit father appear in the midst of a savage tribe to ha- rangue them on his religion ; or is he dragged by them a dauntless victim to the stake ; the one vol- ume that is seen suspended from his neck, is not the Bible, but his breviary. In all this, the Jesuit was but acting with other Romanists. That church has assumed the fearful responsibility of shutting out the sunlight of divine revelation ; undertaking in its stead to supply the reflected light, the moonbeams of tradition, — a gentler brightness, under which no eye will be dazzled, by which no mind will be quick- ened into too rapid a vegetation, — a dubious gloom, favorable alike to wonder, to fear, to slumber, and to fraud. But as the sun will shine, so the Scrip- tures live on. They who preach the truth, but give not the Bible, withhold from their own teachings the most authoritative sanction. Those, on the contrary, whose doctrine is a doctrine of falsehood, contraven- ing and superseding the Scriptures, must yet one day meet that light they would have obscured, and APPENDIX C. 191 find themselves and all their doings tried by the standard they would have fain displaced." * The temporizing policy of the Jesuits in prosecu- ting their missions in China, could not escape the notice of the opponents of that crafty and powerful order; and accordingly, we find that about the com- mencement of the eighteenth century, the question arose in the Romish church whether this amalga- mation of heathenism with Christianity was a lawful method of multiplying converts. This was decided by Pope Clement XL, in the year 1704, against the Jesuits, and the Chinese converts were forbidden by a solemn edict any longer to practise the idolatrous rites of their nation in connection with their pro- fessed Christian worship. This edict, however, so displeased the Jesuit missionaries, that the same Pope, dreading the consequences of exasperating so powerful an order, deemed it politic to issue another edict a few years later, which in effect nullified the provisions of the former. This latter decree, which was dated in 1715, allowed the heathen ceremonies referred to, upon condition that they should be re- garded, not as religious but civil institutions ; a dis- tinction which might serve to satisfy the conscience of the Pope in thus authorizing the ceremonies of heathenism, but would have not the slightest effect on the feelings of the Chinese devotee in mingling in the same act of devotion, the worship of Confucius and of Christ. * Christian Review, Vol. VI., page 184, &c. APPENDIX D.— Page 121. SPRINKLING OF HORSES AT ROME. This absurd ceremony is regularly observed at Rome on St. Anthony's day, the 17th of January. On that day the inhabitants of the city of Rome and vicinity send their horses, &c, decked with ribands, to the convent of St. Anthony, which is situated near the church of St. Mary the Great. A Roman Cath- olic priest in his sacerdotal garments, stands at the church door, with a large sprinkling-brush in his hand, and as each animal is presented to him, he takes off his skull-cap, mutters a few words, in La- tin, intimating that through the merits of the blessed St. Anthony, they are to be preserved for the com- ing year from sickness and death, famine and dan- ger, then dips his brush in a huge bucket of holy water, that stands by him, and sprinkles them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Sometimes the visitor at Rome will see a splendid equipage drive up, attended by outriders, in elegant livery, to have the horses thus sprinkled with holy water, all the people remaining uncovered till the absurd and disgusting ceremony is over. On one occasion a traveller observed a countryman, whose APPENDIX D. 193 beast having received the holy water, set off from the church door at a gallop, but had scarcely gone a hundred yards before the ungainly animal tumbled down with him, and over its head he rolled into the dust. He soon, however, arose, and so did the horse, without either seeming to have sustained much in- jury. The priest looked on, and though his bless- ing had failed, he was not out of countenance ; while some of the by-standers said that but for it, the horse and his rider might have broken their necks. A recent eye-witness of this ceremony, writes as follows : " If I could lead my readers, on the 17th of January, to the church of St. Antoin in Rome, I am convinced they would not know whether they should laugh at the ridiculous religious performances, or weep over the heathenish practices of the church of Rome. He would see a priest in his sacerdotal gar- ments, with a stole over his neck, a brush in his right hand, and sprinkling the mules, asses, and horses with holy water, and praying for them and with them, and blessing them in order to be pre- served the whole year from sickness and death, fam- ine and danger, for the sake and merits of the holy Antony. All this is a grotesque scene, so grotesque that no American can have any idea of it, and hea- then priests would never have thought of it. Add to that, the great mass of people, the kickings of the mules, the meetings of the lovers, the neighings of 17 194 APPENDIX D. the horses, the melodious voices of the asses, the shoutings of the multitude, and mockings of the pro- testants, who reside in Rome, and you have a spec- tacle, which would be new, entirely new, not only for American protestants, but for the heathen them- selves, and must be abominable in the eye of God. But enough ; the subject is too serious ; it is a re- ligious exercise, practised by the priests of Rome, in the so-called metropolis of the Christian world, sanc- tioned by the self-styled infallible head of the church of Rome. All we can say is : ' Ichabod, thy glory is departed.' The priests of heathen Rome would be ashamed of such a religious display in the nine- teenth century."* * Papal Rome as it Is, page 52. Deacidified using the Bookkeeper process. Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxide Treatment Date: Jan. 2006 PreservationTechnologies A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVATION 1 1 1 Thomson Park Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 (724)779-2111 • • • * ■ I X r t