V ",. Vi \^ * r, .v : *%. v' =^v •^ ,,v % ,V ,\V <-/> ^, ^ V '^ v* vv. f qff \\ , ^ £ oH ^ V *b o< •V. V Sfe? *^ .... o cr " «> "O0 x IS 0" * # ^ A \° ^ 0^ {V* - > -^ v o5 Xt- >* v X ^. SIX YEARS IN THE MONASTERIES OF ITALY, AND TWO YEARS ISLANDS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AND IN ASIA MINOR : CONTAINING ▲ YIEW OF THE MANNERS AND CUSTOMS OF THE POPISH CLERGY IN IRELAND, FRANCE, ITALY, MALTA, CORFU, ZANTE, SMYRNA, &C. WITH ANECDOTES AND REMARKS ILLUSTRATING SOME OF THE PECULIAR DOCTRINES OP THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. BY REV. S. I. MAHONEY, LATB A CAPUCHIN FRIAR IN THE CONVENT OP THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION AT ROME. Ov% dvSdvei tov Aaifiovus ovaviv ~d ^prjaKEveiv. A superstitious worship is not pleasing to God. Greek Proverb. BOSTON: JORDAN, SWIFT AND WILEY. 18 45. a! 5 PREFACE. V Among the many works lately published in this country on the subject of the Roman Catholic church, not one, it has been observed, is fitted to give the Protestant reader a just notion of the leading features of that religion. It is not enough, in order that Protestants may justly appreciate the blessings of gospel freedom, to lay open to the world the conduct of some few of the clergy — -to hold up, to the execration of the public, the vices practised within the well secured cloisters of nuns, and to expose the artifices and impositions of priests — but it is also necessary to make it clear, that such effects are the neces- sary consequences of the system itself. And who can better fulfil that duty (for duty it certainly is) than some one who formerly belonged to the Romish priesthood 1 The author of the following pages often wished to see the subject taken up by abler hands than his own, but his wishes have been hitherto in vain. Having spent a great part of his life — from his sixteenth to his twenty-third year — secluded within the walls of a monastery, and having been educated in the capital of popery, he offers to the public the following pages — a narrative of his own life and experience — hoping they may serve as an antidote against the sly and plausible endeavours of popish priests, who, even in this free country, with the true spirit of their church, wish, and are daily endeavouring to subvert the faith of unstable Protest- ants. If he succeed in fully impressing on the minds of Pro- testants the dangers of popery, and in unmasking the plausible excuses of its advocates, he will not consider his labour as thrown away. If he succeed in saving one, only one, whether Protestant or Romanist, male or female, from the dangerous gulf of monachism, he will think himself more than repaid. Recommending the work to the Father of light, who sees the purity of his intentions, and without whose aid no beneficial results can follow from it, he submits himself and it to a reli- gious and discerning public. 6 CONTENTS. CHAPTER I Introduction — The Author's hirth and education — Dedication of children — Evil effects thereof — Two instances — First confession — Its effects on the Author's mind — The Capuchin Superior in Ireland — Meddling of priests in private families, 1 CHAPTER II. Departure for Rome — My father's last words at parting — Reflections — Arrival in Paris — French clergy — State of religion in France — Dis- respect shown to the clergy by the French — An instance of it — Lyons — Conversation with an innkeeper — His description of French reli- gion — French Protestants — Church of Lyons — Arians — Conversion of 1500 Papists — Their return to popery — For what reason — Present revivals, .......... 7 CHAPTER III. Arrival at Rome — Cardinal Micara, General of the Capuchins — How received by him — The lay-brother cicerone — In what department of curiosities he excelled — Removal to Frascati — Description of Frascati and its environs — Reception — The English not Christians — How ex- plained — Italian civility to strangers — Taking the habit — Ceremonies used on that occasion, ........ 12 CHAPTER IV. Rule of St. Francis — Reasons for being unable to obtain a sight of it before receiving the habit — Tradition attached to it — Francis' conversation with the miraculous crucifix — Pope Honorius — Canoni- cally elected popes — Infallibility — Lents — Wonderful change of flesh- meat into fish, 19 CHAPTER V. Continuation of the rule — Monkish vow of poverty — How observ- ed — Anecdote of a Carmelite — Masses — Obedience — Education of Novices — An ass turned into an ox — The tree of obedience, .. 25 CHAPTER VI. What excited Francis to found his order — Benedictines — Santoni — State of the religious orders in the thirteenth century — State of the people — Francis' ambition, .31 CHAPTER VII. Novitiate— Education of Novices — Master-novice — His qualifica- tions — Popish prayers — Canonization and Beatification — Canonical hours, 36 CHAPTER VIII. Breviary — Its unwilling agency in leading many priests to the truth — Story of a Tyrolese monk — His conversion — The cause of it — Remarks upon it by a professor of theology — How a popish priest may commit seven mortal sins per diem, . . .42 7 Vlll CONTENTS. CHAPTER IX. Design of the Breviary — Pius V.'s bull — Extract from it — Marcel- lus — Life of Gregory the Great — His works — Life of Leo I. — His great exploits — Remarks thereon — Nunneries of Tuscany, . 47 CHAPTER X. Continuation of extracts from the Breviary — Marcellinus — The pope sacrifices to idols — Why he could not be judged by the church- Infallibility, a species of impeccability — John — The testimony of a horse in favour of his claims — Remarks thereon — A sample of Gregory the Great's works — Review of the B ishop of Rome's claim to supremacy — Never acknowledged by the Greek church — Uninterrupted succes- sion — Imaginary popes manufactured, .... 54 CHAPTER XL Continuation of extracts from the Breviary — St. Vincent Ferreri — Miracle — Suspension of the laws of nature — Remarks — Adoration of Vincent at Valencia — St. Anthony of Padua — Preaches to the birds- Hymn composed in his honour — His miracles — Sailing without ship or boat — Removal of mountains — St. Denis walking with his head in his hand — Shrine of an Italian saint — Concluding remarks on the Breviary, 61 CHAPTER XII. Evils attending a monkish life — Novices kept in ignorance of the real state of a monk — Passions to which monks are subject — Hatred and anger — Ambition — Tragical story of two Tuscan monks — Method of conveying moral instruction — Narrative of an occurrence said to have taken place in the Capuchin convent of Frascati — Why the Capuchins wear beards — The wood of the true cross, . . 71 CHAPTER XIII. Termination of Novitiate — Votes of the other monks required be- fore the novice can be admitted to profession — Ceremonies used at the profession of a monk — The monastic vows — Good and bad monks — Story of a bad monk — Monkish persecutions — The bad monk's flight from Turjn — How treated by the general at Rome — His secularization — Expenses incurred before he could obtain it — The bad monk turned into a zealous preacher of the gospel — Classification of monks, . 79 CHAPTER XIV. Convents of study — The employment in which those monks who are void of talents are engaged — Monastic studies — Logic — Metaphy- sics — Its use in supporting popish doctrines — Dogmatic theology- Its evil tendency — Mutilation of Scripture — Purgatory — Popish theologians — Polemical divinity — Character of popish polemics — How they excuse themselves — Moral theology — Auricular confession — Its instrumentality in the support of priestcraft, . . .91 CHAPTER XV. Continuation of remarks upon moral theology — Mortal and venial sins — Precepts of the church — Prohibition to sell flesh-meat on Fridays and Saturdays — Punishment of those who transgress the precept of fasting — Confession and communion — Sentence of excommunication — Number of popish sacraments — The Eucharist— Anathema of the Council of Trent against all who deny the real presence — Absurdity "of that doctrine — One hundred thousand Christs created every day— CONTENTS. IX Popish inventions for the support of the doctrine of Transubstantia- tion — The miraculous corporal — Miraculous particle — State of the Jews at Rome — A mule's testimony of the truth of the real presence — Anecdote of Rabelais — Sale of masses — Cost of a high mass — Reflections — The treatise upon oaths — No faith to be kept with here- tics — Dispensing power of priests — Murder of Protestant clergymen in Ireland — Jesuitical morality, ..... 100 CHAPTER XVI. Reflections upon monastic studies — Extraordinary charity of those who endeavour to excuse doctrinal error — The young monk begins to see monachism as it really is — Schools in which he learns the secrets of monachism — Want of decorum in reciting the divine office — Gradual corruption of the young monk — Monks bons vivants — The manner in which the income of convents is spent — Belly versus Obedience, a scene in monkish life — Cardinal Micara in jeopardy — The foregoing scene dramatized — Calumny and detraction of monks — Their conversation in the refectory — Monkish luxuries obtained at the sacrifice of honour and virtue — Story of a young man, the victim of monkish calumny — Clerk of the kitchen — Manner of punishing a bad cook — Monkish fasting and abstinence — Lent — Dinners — Colla- tion — Monkish false pretensions, 116 CHAPTER XVII. Effects of bad example — Its effect on the Author's mind — He seeks the advice of his confessor — The confessor's apology for the vices of his order — A word of advice from the same for the Author's private use — Tampering with the consciences of others, as practised in the confessional — The Author practises upon his confessor's advice — Falls into infidelity — Argues publicly against the existence of God — Becomes an object of suspicion to his fellow monks — Search made in his .room for heretical books and papers — Johnson's Dictionary con- victed of heresy — Ordination — Number of orders in the Romish church — In what the candidate for ordination is examined — Character of Mortsignor Macioti, Suffragan-bishop of Villetri — Episcopus in partibus, 129 CHAPTER XVIII. Jealousies and enmities of monks of different orders — Reasons for entertaining such hostile feelings against each other — Sample of monkish lampoons — The immaculate conception of the blessed Virgin — The Dominicans and Franciscans declare war against each other — Monkish imposture — Tragic story of Jetzer — The ghost of a Domini- can appears to him — Jetzer undergoes the discipline in order to redeem his brother's soul from purgatory — The virgin prior — Revela- tions made by the Virgin to Jetzer — He receives the five wounds that pierced Jesus on the Cross — Jetzer discovers the imposture — The Dominicans attempt to poison him — He flies from them, and seeks the protection of the civil authorities — The actors in the infernal plot burned alive — Jetzer's death — The use which the Franciscans make of the foregoing narrative — Number of religious orders — How distin- guished from each other — Division of monks — Number of the clergy in the capital of popery — Number of beggars, . . . 142 CHAPTER XIX. Hope of salvation placed in being buried in a Franciscan habit — Story of a soul saved from eternal damnation through the merits of St. Francis-— Emoluments derived by the monks from the popular X • » CONTENTS. superstitions — Story of an heir who was struck dead for defrauding the Franciscans of their due — Ways practised by monks for promoting their own interests — Their tampering with the females of those families over which they have acquired influence — Story in illustration of the foregoing — Allurements held out- to females to enter nunneries — Monkish treachery illustrated — A young gentleman's own account of the snares laid by monks for himself, and his sisters — One of his sis- ters dies of a broken heart on discovering her mistake — Happy termi- nation of the young man's misfortunes, .... 152 CHAPTER XX. Adoration and prayers to saints — Confirmed by the Council of Trent — Absurdity of that doctrine — Image-worship — Papists feally and truly idolaters — How they excuse themselves — Adoration of the statue of Saint Januarius at Naples — Blasphemous prayer addressed to Jesus Christ by the Neapolitans — Idol- worship practised by all false religions — Modern Greeks and Romans inexcusable — History of the rise and progress of image-worship in the church of Christ — Image-worship abhorred by the primitive church — Opinions of some of the early fathers on that subject — Images of saints admitted as ornaments in the churches in the beginning of the fifth century — Gregory the Great condemns image-worship — The monks of the eighth century establish image-worship by their own example — Edict of Leo, the Isaurian, concerning images — The priests and monks ex- cite the people to rebellion, in consequence of it — Leo orders all images to be publicly burnt — Image-worship favoured by popes — Iconoclastae, and Iconolatrae — Charlemagne declares against image- worship — Claudius, Bishop of Turin, orders all images to be cast out of the churches — Image-worship established by law in the eastern and western churches, and triumphs till the era of the reformation — Effects of the reformation on image- worship, . . . . 169 CHAPTER XXI. Image-worship in the nineteenth century — Statue of St. Peter — Opinions as to its identity with one of the pagan divinities of ancient Rome — Story illustrating the vengeance which it takes on those who dishonour it — Another, whereby it becomes clear that his brazes saintship has the power of protecting his devout worshippers — Reflec- tions, ' 180 CHAPTER XXII. Images of the Virgin Mary — La Santa Casa di Loretto — History of the Holy House — Income of the priests attached to it — Sale of vermin — The miraculous image of the Virgin Mary at Basil — Expedient of the priests for reviving the dying superstition — Letter of the Virgin Mary to a reformed clergyman — Notes explanatory of the foregoing letter — Late repentance — Litany of the Virgin — St. Peter, gate-keeper of heaven — Gulielmus — George — St. Anthony, protector of swine — Different offices assigned to the crowd of saints in the popish calendar — Reflections, 189 CHAPTER XXIII. Continuation of remarks upon image-worship — Popish unity — Madonna della lettera at Messina — The Virgin Mary a linguist — Gopy of the Virgin's letter to the Messinians — Translation of the foregoing — Spain, and its idolatries — Spanish Jesuits — Spanish form of saluta- tions — Portugal — Don Miguel favoured by the priests — A miracle wrought in confirmation of his authority — The Virgin delivered of a boy twelve years old — Effect of the discovery on Don Miguel's govern- ment — Concluding remarks upon image-worship, . . 202 CONTENTS. Xi CHAPTER XXIV Relics — Practice of the primitive church — Relic-worship established by the pope — Manner of procuring saint-bodies — The three heads of John the Baptist — The offal of the charnel-houses made the object of a Christian's adoration — St. Crispin of Viterbo — St. Spiridione — Contest between the Greeks and Latins, for the possession of his body — Relic-worship at Malta — Maltese quack-doctor — Relics preserved in the church of St. John at Malta — Attempt to steal a relic- Anecdotes of the plague at Malta — Translation of a saint's body from the catacombs at Rome to Malta — Stupendous miracle performed by touching the foregoing body — Reflections — Milk of the Virgin Mary — Shrine of Thomas a Becket at Canterbury — Henry VIII. and his myrnfidons — Relation of the manner in which the Virgin's milk found its way to the monastery of St. Mary's, near Falmouth — Con- cluding remarks on relic-worship, . . . . . 213 CHAPTER XXV. Indulgences — When first granted — Leo X. publishes indulgences- Form of indulgences — Language of indulgence-mountebanks — Ex- tract from the " Tax of the Sacred Roman Chancery" — Dispute be- tween the Augustinians and Dominicans — Luther, and the reformation — Galileo Galilei — Decline of indulgences in Italy — The pope grants indulgences — gratis, because he could find no purchasers — The Cruzada — Spaniards obliged by the secular arm to purchase indul- gences — Probable income of the pope from the sale of indulgences in Spain — Bishops endowed with the power of granting and selling indulgences— Obliged to pay an annual rent to the pope — A bishop suspended from his functions, and confined to a convent, by reason of not being able to pay the pope's rent, .... 238 CHAPTER XXVI. Conscientious bishops — Monsignor Gondolfi — Maronites — Mon- signor Gondolfi sent in the character of apostolic delegate to the east- ern churches — Decline of popery and cause of that decline, among the Maronites — Gondolfi's instructions — Cunning of his holiness, cloaked under a love for the souls of the Maronites — Gondolfi's early life — State of the monks attached to the holy sepulchre, at Jerusalem — Gondolfi endeavours to reform them — The monks accuse him of heresy at the court of Rome — Obliged to be on his guard against the machinations of the monks — He removes to Mount Libanus — State of the Maronite clergy and people — Distribution of the Scriptures made by the Protestant missionaries among the Maronites — The Maronite clergy accuse Gondolfi at Rome — He is recalled, but refuses to obey — He is expelled from the convent — Arrival of his successor — Bibles burned by thousands — Gondolfi is poisoned by a Maronite priest — The Maronites report that his death was caused by the ven- geance of God — Indulgences for committing sin — Alexander VI. — Massacre of St. Bartholomew — Fra Paolo — Curious theological dis- quisition, 251 CHAPTER XXVn. Departure from Rome — Refused permission to return to Ireland — Plan of escape — How executed — Arrival at Marseilles and Lyons- Geneva — Monsieur Cheneviere — Socinianism — English travellers on the continent of Europe— Rabbi M s, the conveited Jew — His perfidy — Arrival in London — Treatment received from false and per* fidious friends, " . . . 270 Xll CONTENTS. CHAPTER XXVIII. State of reHgion in Malta — Number of popish priests — Their ig- norance — Ignorance of the people — Bishop Caruana — Power of the pope in Malta — Anecdote of a Maltese attorney — Doctor Naudi — Maltese medical college — Naudi's treachery — He is found out by an English missionary — Maltese monks — Number of monasteries in Malta — Paulotists — Dominicans — Carmelites — Ignorance of the Mal- tese monks — Convent of Capuchins at Malta — Padre Pietro, the Capuchin Custode — Padre Calcedonio— Story of a child violated by him in Santa Maura — He is sent to the galleys — Remission of his sentence, through the influence of General Rivarola — Esteemed as a saint by the Maltese, 284 CHAPTER XXIX. Continuation of remarks upon the popish clergy of Malta — Their general incontinency — Father Butler, chaplain to the English forces at Malta — Meaning of the initials, " D. D." affixed to his name — Hia mania for making proselytes — Sam pie of popish conversions — A Pro- testant converted to popery after death — Another sample of Father Butler's way of making proselytes — Father Butler appears in a new character — Sir Dominick Ritual, and Sir Paul Text-book — Sir Domi- nick disgraces his knighthood — Concluding remarks on popery in Malta, 299 CHAPTER XXX. Rev. Mr. Lowndes, Protestant missionary — Greek priests at Corfu- State of religion at Corfu — Popish clergy and archbishop— Conversa- tion with the popish archbishop — His attempt to wheedle me again into popery — My answer — Persecution by the popish priests, and its effect — Zante — Popish priests at Zante — Mr. Croggon, the Wesleyan missionary — Letter from Smyrna to Mr. Lowndes — The popish priests attempt to poison me — Effects of the poison — Departure from Zante — Arrival at Smyrna — Conclusion, .... 308 SIX YEARS IN THE MONASTERIES OF ITALY, &c. CHAPTER I. Introduction — The Author's birth and education — Dedication of children — Evil effects thereof — Two instances — First confession — Its effects on the Author's mind — The Capuchin Superior in Ireland — Meddling of priests in private families. t The religion of Rome, miscalled Catholic, a short history of which, as it exists in the monasteries and other popish institutions of Italy and the islands of the Medi- terranean, will form the subject of this book, is so well guarded by the passions— the attendants of human nature — that it requires more than an ordinary effort of the human mind to free itself from its galling trammels. It is indeed the religion of human nature, whether it be regarded in a temporal or spiritual light. If in the latter, the influence exercised over the minds of its members by a wily priesthood, and the dangerous security, so differ- ent from the gospel/ear and trembling, into which they are lulled by the organs of confession, and forgiveness by the mouth of a priest, fully prove that human nature is only flattered by its operations : if in the former, the numerous ceremonies so pleasing to the senses, the su- perstitious veneration in which its clergy are held, and the opportunities possessed by them of reconciling the people to every passing event, and which opportunities they never let slip ; all these form separate and convinc- 2 1 2 SIX YEARS IN THE ing proofs, that human nature is the foundation stone, on which the Romish church is built. The foregoing reflections were strongly brought to my mind, whilst considering my own peculiar case, and the difficulties I had to struggle with before embracing the blessed and consoling doctrine of justification through the all-atoning blood of Jesus Christ. To break not only through the prejudices of education, but also to set at defiance the workings of the passions by which the church of Rome is upheld, is, all must confess, no easy matter. How I have been able to accomplish that great task will be seen in the sequel. To the history of my early life, though it may contain many things, which worldly prudence would consider as best kept in my own bosom, yet as it is a picture — a faithful one too — of the education of Roman Catholic children in Ireland, and especially of those destined for the priesthood, I have no hesitation to give publicity. I was born in the city of C , Ireland. My father was a corn merchant of that city, respectably connected, though not rich. I am the last of five children, and was destined for the church from the hour of my birth. I say destined / for strange as it may appear, such a cus- tom of setting apart young children for the service of the church, prevailed and still prevails in Ireland, as well as in most parts of popish Europe. The child's inclination is never consulted, and how could it be, when his future profession is marked out, whilst he is yet an infant, and unable to judge for himself? If, however, he should refuse, when arrived at the age of understanding, to fulfil what his father had promised,* he is looked upon, not only by the members of his own family, but also by his neigh- bours and acquaintances, as one living in a state of alien- ation from God, and as one who never can have any success in the transactions of the world. I knew in Italy a young man — he belonged to Albano, a town in the papal states — who, not coming to the age of understanding till after his father's death, thought proper to consult his * The selecting of a new-born child for the priesthood is consi- dered as a vow, or promise. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 3 own inclinations, and to decline the honour of the priest- hood, though his father, at his birth, had dedicated him to the church. Wishing afterwards to enter into the mar- ried state, he could find no young woman, his equal in rank, who could be prevailed upon to unite her lot with his. He was once on the point of being married to one of a neighbouring town, but when she came to the know- ledge of his having been destined by his father for the priesthood, she immediately broke off the match, although he was possessed of a handsome fortune, and very well able to maintain her respectably. All are taught, that a curse from on high would fall either on themselves or their children, should they unite themselves to one, promised from his infancy to God. I knew another — his name was Papi — , a young man of a most prepossessing ap- pearance, and possessed of a cultivated mind, who, refus- ing to become a priest, was absolutely turned adrift on the world by his father, and all this, because the latter had promised him to God from his infancy. Starvation at length obliged him to succumb to his father's wishes, and he was sacrificed — another unwilling victim — at the monstrous shrine of popular superstition. I saw him after his ordination, and he had no difficulty in complain- ing to me of the cruelty of his parents, who obliged him to embrace a profession for which he had no vocation. I could mention many other cases of this nature, which fell under my own observation, but the two related will be sufficient to show the evil effects necessarily following the dedication of children. My father, however, had no occasion to threaten me with such extremes, fori never resisted, but,'on the con- trary, was rather desirous of entering the church, though indeed had I murmured against fulfilling his vow, I am almost certain, that he, although the kindest and best of fathers, would have treated me with the same rigour, with which my friend Papi had been treated by his ; — such power have superstition and the erroneous ideas of reli- gion over even the best minds. It being then understood, that I was destined for the church, my earliest notions were formed by priests. 4 SIX TEARS IN THE Every moment I could spare from my studies was spent either with them, or in some place under their direction. At ten years of age, I was taught to babble the answering of mass in Latin, and obliged to remain daily two or three hours at the chapel, as Roman Catholic churches are called in Ireland. Sunday was a day of trouble to me — not of devotion ; being forced to spend nearly the whole day serving masses, of which I very soon grew tired. Indeed, there was nothing in the repeating of words in Latin — a language I did not then understand — which could make amends for the trouble, and I often longed to be as free as my other brothers, who, not being intended for the church, were allowed to divert them- selves with their equals. The time for making my first confession now approached. I shall for ever remember with what a palpitating heart I first approached the seat of judgment — the confessional — called by Romanists " the tribunal of penance." How my young inexperi- enced heart, impressed with an exalted idea of the priest's power of forgiving sin, sank within me, as I knelt down at the feet of him, who, I was led to believe, represented the person of Jesus Christ. It remains still impressed on my mind, with what an authoritative tone of voice he questioned me on my most secret thoughts, reproving me for this and giving penance for that ; and how happy I felt, and how free from all care, when he pronounced in Latin the form of absolution. Yes, if an ignorance of my lost sinful state, and a reliance on man for salvation, can be called happiness, I was then happy indeed. But was my heart changed in the mean time ? Or did I feel a detestation of sin, and love the Lord Jesus for his own sake ? Quite the contrary ! I never thought about the necessity of a change of heart ; and my prayers were, by the advice of my father confessor, addressed to the Virgin and the Saints, and not to Him who alone is able to grant the humble penitent a true sorrow for sin, and to inflame his mind with a holy love for himself. So far from feeling a sorrow for sin, my ambition was only excited the more to become a priest, and thereby become vested with the extraordinary power MONASTERIES OP ITALY. ETC. 5 of forgiving the sins of others ; thinking at the same time, that if I once had possession of the superhuman power of forgiving others, I could also, a fortiori, forgive my- self without being indebted to another person for that favour. Such were my peculiar feelings after my first confession, and such, I am confident, are the feelings of the greater number of Roman Catholics under similar circumstances. Having now nearly reached my sixteenth year, and having acquired as much Latin and Greek at a prepara- tory school, as was deemed sufficient for admittance to college, it began to be debated upon in the family circle, whether I should go to Maynooth, or rather be sent to Rome. The latter place was preferred ; and the reason it was so, it may perhaps be necessary to mention here- It will give the Protestant reader some idea of the influ- ence exercised by priests in those families with which they are intimate. A Capuchin friar, provincial of the order, in Ireland, was a frequent visiter at my father's house. He took particular notice of me, of course, as one destined to become a priest one day himself. He even, at my father's request, often examined me in the Latin gram- mar, and cried out " bravo, bravo," if I could conjugate amo, or decline musa. He took care, however, never to go farther in his examinations than the grammar, the reason for which I never could learn, unless it be, which is not improbable, that he knew no farther himself. When the subject of my removal to college began to be debated upon, he also gave his opinion, and of course decided in favour of his own order. The going so far from home (it being necessary to go to Rome, in order to become a member of his order) was for some time objected to ; but he being my father's confessor soon overruled that objection, by laying open the respectability of his order, and the powerful intercession of its founder St. Francis, and the happiness of having a son so inti- mately connected with the holy patriarch. These weighty reasons met with due attention from my father, and all thoughts of going to Maynooth college were soon 2* 6 SIX YEARS IN THE laid aside, and preparations were immediately made for my journey to Rome. I was not, at this time, old enough to see into the reason, that the old friar was so anxious that I should join his order, but I afterwards sus- pected it, when I became aware that the remittances of money sent to me by my father, passed through his hands. It is reasonable then to suppose, that he did not want for excuses to apply some of it tQ. his own private use. Whether he has done so, or not, I cannot assert with any certainty ; but this I am sure of, that I never received more than two-thirds of what my father, as I learned from his letters, had committed to him for my use. The deficiency was accounted for, by his being obliged to pay the postage of letters, sent by his friends in Rome, relative to me, and by his sending them some presents, to encourage them to continue their friendship and protection of me. I once complained to my father by letter of this deficiency, but the above reasons of the old friar's soon quieted him. To do him justice, he gave me a great many letters to his private friends at Rome, where he had studied himself some thirty years before, strongly recommending me to their friendship. He also in his capacity of superior of the order in Ireland, gave me an ubbedienza (so letters of admission into a monas- tery are called) directed to the general of the whole order at Rome. I would not be so particular in the relation of the foregoing circumstances had I not thought, that they show the Jesuitical pranks of priests, and the unworthy use they make of their influence over the minds of their deluded followers. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. CHAPTER II. Departure for Rome — My father's last words at parting — Reflections — Arrival in Paris — French clergy — State of religion in France — Disrespect shownrfo the clergy by the French — An instance of it — Lyons — Conversation with an innkeeper — His description of French religion — French Protestants — Church of Lyons — Arians — Conversion of fifteen hundred Papists — Their return to Popery — For what reason — Present revivals. The day fixed for my departure at length arrived, and with a heart torn asunder by the contending emotions of joy and sorrow — joy for the sure prospect held out of arriving at the goal of my wishes, sorrow for leaving my father and mother, and those who were dearest to me — I embarked in my native city for Bristol — thence to proceed to Southampton, where I was to find the regular packet for Havre-de-Grace, and then proceed by land to Rome. My father's last words to me, spoken whilst I was in the act of going aboard the steamer, will ever remain in- delibly fixed in my memory. They were these, " Re- turn a priest, or never let me see you again." What words from the kindest and best of fathers ! Without considering whether, on further examination, I would feel inclined for such a profession, or whether I would not be rendered miserable all my life, if I acted in that respect contrary to my own inclinations, he laid his posi- tive injunction upon me " to return a priest" under pain of perpetual exile from him, and from those dearest to me. Yet he was the kindest and best of fathers in other respects ; indeed in every thing, where the influence of the Roman Catholic religion did not enter. But where that was in any way concerned, he always regulated his actions by the advice of the priests, and especially his confessor's ; who, to be sure, with the true spirit of their church, gave that advice which they thought most likely to promote its well-being; regardless whether this advice would not sow dissensions in families, and set father 8 SIX YEARS IN THE against son, and wife against husband. — But such, it is well known, is popish morality. Upon my arrival at Havre, I immediately took a place in the diligence for Paris, which capital, if I well re- member, I reached after a journey of two days. I had letters for some Irish students and priests in the Irish college at Paris, and my first care, aftej: my arrival, was to deliver them. The greater part 6T these strongly advised me not to go to Rome, telling me many stories of the hardships, which I probably would have to endure there ; and of the very many, who went there on the same purpose as myself, but who returned before the expiration of a year, having made shipwreck of their faith and vocation. To all this I turned a deaf ear, being determined, whatever would be the consequence, to continue my journey, and judge for myself when arrived at Rome. Perhaps also my father's parting admonition helped me on to this decision. The disrespect with which the clergy are treated in France, and especially in Paris, very much surprised me. I had no idea that the men, who in Ireland are esteemed as demi-gods, could in France be exposed to the insults, not only of the common people, but also of the higher ranks, who forget that politeness natural to every Frenchman, when a priest is in question. I remember, whilst walking one day in the neighbourhood of the Pa- lais Royal at Paris, to have seen a great crowd collected in one spot. I went to see what was the matter. I saw an unfortunate man, whom I knew to be a priest from his dress, stretched in the street, and bleeding profusely, a carriage having thrown him down, and passed over one of his legs, whilst he was passing from one side of the street to the other. The crowd collected around him, rich and poor as they were, stood laughing at him, and seemingly rejoiced at his misfortune. He was unable to walk, so dreadfully was he bruised and mangled. Now, if the same accident had happened in Ireland to one of the same character, there is not a Roman Catholic, or Protestant either, I believe, in the country that would not feel honoured in bearing on his own shoulders to his MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 9 house, the unfortunate sufferer. I mention this anecdote, in order to give some idea of the hatred and detestation in which priests are held in France. On relating the occurrence to my friends at the Irish college, they only made a laugh of it, saying, " that I was but yet a stranger in France, but were I to remain long in the country, I would soon become familiarized to such scenes." Indeed, they told me seriously, that there is more respect in France for the commonest porter that parades the streets in search of a load, than for a priest, however learned and pious. To one lately come from Ireland, called by the French priests, when comparing their own state with that of their Irish brethen, " le paridis des pretres" — the priest's paradise — such stories must have appeared won- derfully strange ; yet, in the course of my travels through other departments of France, I found that they were lite- rally true. Whilst at Lyons, where I remained some days before crossing the Alps into Italy, I put up at one of the hotels — the " hotel des Etats Unis" I believe it was called. Entering one evening into conversation with mine host, he asked me, what was my profession, and for what object I was going to Italy? I told him the plain truth. He then began sacre-ing all the priests in the world, calling them a parcel of knaves and impostors, and told me plainly, that if I were not going away the following day, he should be under the necessity of re- questing me to find another hotel, for he would not have his house contaminated by the presence of even an in- tended priest. He assured me, " that if a priest dared enter his house, he would throw him out through the window, lest the respectability of his hotel should be injured, if it were known abroad, that it had sheltered so detestable an animal as a priest." Tasked him, if he were a Roman Catholic ? " I am," he replied, " because my father was one, but I never go to mass, nor are there one hundred people in the town, who ever go to it." He added, that they remain Roman Catholics, because their fathers were so before them, but that they never follow any of the foolish doctrines of priests. It may per- haps be suspected, that this man was a solitary instance, 10 SIX YEARS IN THE and that he did not speak the truth, when he told me — perhaps in order to deter me from becoming a priest — that his fellow townsmen were like himself. But farther inquiry fully convinced me, that he had spoken almost literally the truth, and I appeal to any traveller from this country, who may have taken the trouble to inquire about the state of religion in France, for the truth of his asser- tions and of his representations. So great is the disre- spect in which the French popish clergy are held by their countrymen, that no one of any qualifications by which he could earn a subsistence in any other way, would be- come one. The lame, the crippled, the stammerer, those who have not the spirit, or who are not able, to earn a subsistence by labour, in fine, those of the lowest grades in society, compose the greater number of the modern French clergy. If there be any thing like Christianity in France, it is to be found only among the few Protestants scattered through the country, and not, by any means, among the Roman Catholic population. A great many of the latter pass through life without any sense of reli- gion, and totally ignorant of the first principles of Chris- tianity. The Roman Catholic churches, though opened for form-sake every day, are almost empty, there being many Frenchmen who never saw the inside of a church, even through curiosity, during a long life. With some classes, infidelity is no longer the fashion. These make a show of religion, because they are unwilling to be thought unbelievers ; yet, if their creed be examined, they will be found to have as little belief in the doctrines of Christianity, as those who make open profession of infidelity. The prevalent opinion among* all classes is, that when a man dies, there is an end to him. They be- lieve not in the immortality of the soul ; yet some, to keep up the appearance of religion, are not unobservant of popish superstitions. There have always been Protest- ants at Lyons, St. Etienne, and Chalons ; but their inter- course with Roman Catholics has plunged them into the same state of irreligion as the latter, so that they retain nothing of Protestants but the name. They are nearly as far gone in infidelity as their popish fellow country MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 11 men, and have the same disregard for the religious edu- cation of their children. The Protestants of Lyons were wholly Socinians till within a few years back. The theological colleges in which the pastors are educated, though very effective as far as learning goes, inculcate the Arian doctrines. When the divinity of the Saviour is denied, a disregard for the incalculable importance of his mission necessarily follows. An indifference about the gospel comes next, and from this the transition to absolute infidelity is very easy. Most French Protest- ants have been brought up in early life without any wor- ship at all, and thereby becoming almost all pure ration- alists, they countenance the church, more because they eannot do without the rites of marriage, baptism, and sepulture, than for any more cogent reasons. In the year 1826, on the occasion of the law of sacri- lege being promulgated in France, fifteen hundred Roman Catholics abandoned popery, and attached them- selves to the Protestant church of France — that is, to Arianism. The greater part of these returned to popery before the expiration of a year, and it would be a great wonder if they had not ; for surely a religion so flatter- ing to human nature as popery is, which lulls the con- science to sleep, and satisfies the religious propensities without taxing it, must have appeared infinitely prefer- able to the commonplace morality and frigid worship of those who deny the fundamental doctrine of Christianity — the divinity of its Founder ; which, if it be not a sine qua non, an essential article of a Christian's belief, Christianity itself is nothing better than a cunningly devised fable, put together to answer the purposes of designing men. The Protestant religion is reviving in France very much within these two years. Evangelical churches are established in many of the principal cities, and even Lyons itself, as much the hot-bed of Arianism as Geneva, has now to glory in no small number of de- voted, pious Christians. These with their minister were expelled from the only house of Protestant worship that existed at Lyons ; but they met afterwards in private houses, and continued to do so, till their numbers in- 12 SIX TEARS IN THE creased, and they had been able to raise sufficient funds to build a church for themselves. They have now one large enough to contain the primitive flock, and also those who, attracted by the force of gospel truth, are daily uniting themselves to them, and deserting from the ranks of popery, Arianism, and infidelity. CHAPTER III. Arrival at Rome — Cardinal Micara, General of the Capuchins- — How received by him — The Lay-brother cicerone — In what department of curiosities he excelled — Removal to Frascati — Description of Frascati and its environs — Reception — The English not Chris- tians — How explained — Italian civility to strangers — Taking the habit — Ceremonies used on that occasion. It is foreign to the design of the present work to give an account of my journey, and a description of the differ- ent countries through which I passed on the route from Paris to Rome. Be it sufficient, then, to state, that I arrived in the latter city in about three months after my departure from Ireland. The journey is generally made in twenty days by those who are travelling on urgent business, but mine not being of that stamp, I stopped for some days in the different towns on the road. I rested five or six days at Turin, the first Italian town met with after descending from the Alps — and the capital of Pied- mont. The road afterwards lay through Alexandria, Genoa, Leghorn, Florence, &c, in each of which towns I remained some few days. Upon my arrival at Rome, I presented my letters and other credentials to the general of the Capuchins, who was just created a cardinal a few weeks before my arrival, by Leo XII., the then reigning pontiff. I believe he is still living, or, at least, was about six months ago. His name is Cardinal Micara, a native of Frascati, and esteemed the most learned theolo- gian of Rome. He is easily distinguished from the other cardinals, on account of his wearing a long, shaggy beard, MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 13 and mustaches, of which he seems to be very proud. I was received by him with very great kindness. He ordered a room to be immediately prepared for me in the convent, in which I was to reside during my stay at Rome ; giving me, at the same time, to understand that it was necessary for me to proceed to Frascati — the ancient Tusculum — to serve my novitiate. He, how- ever, allowed me the space of three weeks to see Rome and its curiosities before my departure ; giving orders to one of the lay-brothers to accompany me to the differ- ent places I wished to see. My lay-brother, however, proved a bad cicerone; for, although a Roman by birth, he knew as much about the real curiosities of ancient or modern Rome as a native of Otaheite. I had a great desire to see some of those places, which were rendered fami- liar to me by reading the Roman classics, but of these, alas ! my cicerone knew as much as the man in the moon. He made ample amends, however, for his ignorance of those things by an extensive knowledge of all the miracu- lous images of the Madonna, of the different crucifixes, of the relics of the saints, of the churches, where so many days' indulgences may be obtained, and the redemption of so many souls from purgatory, and all for the trouble of reciting a "pater noster." — But of these things, more in the sequel. After having seen a few churches, and some miracle working relics, I grew tired ; and having pur- chased " The Stranger's Guide through Rome," I sallied forth alone, and by the help of it, satisfied in some degree my curiosity. The time allowed me for the gratification of my curio- sity being now expired, I was summoned one morning very early to the presence of his eminence the cardinal. He received me with his usual kindness, and laughed very heartily when I related to him in French, which he spoke very fluently, the ciceronic lay-brother's want of knowledge in Roman antiquities. He told me, that I would have time enough to examine Rome, both ancient and modern, after my year's novitiate was ended, and that, until then, I should go to Frascati, and put on the seraphic habit— so the Franciscan habit is called. He 3 14 SIX YEARS IN THE earnestly advised me to apply myself to the study of Italian, and gave me an Italian grammar, and an Anglo- Italian dictionary, for that purpose. Holding out his hand to be kissed, and giving me his benediction, he then dismissed me, telling me to hold myself in readiness for my departure at four o'clock that same evening. The distance from Rome to Frascati being only twelve miles, I soon arrived there ; having already made up my mind to persevere in the primary intention, for which I had left my own country, whatever might be the conse- quence, or whatever the difficulties I should have to contend with. As Frascati and its neighbourhood was the scene of many of the occurrences which will be hereafter related, it may not be thought irrelative to give a hasty description of them. Frascati is situated in the Campagna di Roma, about twelve miles distant from " the holy city.'''' It is built nearly on the site of the ancient Tusculum, so well known as the place in which Cicero wrote his " Ques- tiones Tusculanae." The ruins of Tusculum, which are still extant, are about two miles from the modern city J yet it is supposed that the former, in the time of its an- cient splendour, extended as far as the plain, in which the latter is now built. It commands a' fine view of the surrounding country, especially from the Capuchin con- vent — the one in which I resided. There are in its im- mediate neighbourhood several splendid villas belonging to the Roman nobility, the principal of which are il pa- lazzo Borghese, belonging to the prince of that name, who seldom or never lives in it ; il palazzo Falconieri, which is let out as a summer residence to English travellers, or to any other foreigners that are willing to pay for it ; and the Bofanello, the late residence of Lu- cien Buonaparte for a number of years. At the distance of eight miles towards the Apennines is placed Tivoli, which, whatever may have been its grandeur in the time of Roman greatness, is now but an insignificant village. On the same direction, but nearer to Frascati, is the town called after the family of the Porzia, " Monte Porzio," so abominably filthy, that the inhabitants them- MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 15 selves, punning on the name, call it " monte dei porci" — pig mountain. On the other side of Frascati, and toward the sea, are Rocca di Papa, Rocca Prior e, Monte Competri — all insignificant villages, and distinguished for nothing but dirt and monasteries — one of which, very celebrated, is built on the top of a high mountain over- hanging the village of Rocca di Papa. It belongs to the frati della passione, or passion monks, so called from their wearing on their habits a picture representing the passion of Christ. Would it not be better, and more scriptural, for them to have Christ's passion imprinted on their hearts ? — But they think otherwise. Having presented the general's letter to the local superior of Frascati, I was admitted into the convent under the character of a postulante — a name given to those who, not being yet dressed in the habit, wish to be sure whether their vocation would continue after hav- ing observed more closely the manners and customs of the monks. I saw nothing during the time — about two months — I remained in this way, which could cause me to repent of my undertaking, or deter me from embracing the order. On the contrary, every thing seemed carried on according to the strictest rules of propriety. I was treated by the superior and the other monks with very great kind- ness and attention, approaching almost to affection ; the former frequently taking me as his umbra, or shade, to dine at some gentleman's house, of which he was the spiritual director; whilst the latter almost daily accom- panied me through the villas and palaces 01 the neigh- bourhood, to all of which they had a free and easy access, by reason of their monastic profession and the respect paid to it. In this way, two months passed over very agreeably, and, at the end of that time, my desire of joining the order was more ardent than before. The Italians in general are very obliging to strangers, especially to those strangers from whom they expect some advantage. The Italian monks are particularly so to those coming to unite themselves to their order, espe- cially if they be foreigners ; for it is thought, that it adds to the respectability of the order, and gives it distinction 16 SIX YEARS IN THE in the eyes of the public, to have a great number of foreigners attached to it. The hope, also, of establishing convents, and propagating the Roman Catholic religion through their means in foreign parts, may be another motive for treating foreigners with more than usual kind- ness. It was a long time since the order counted any students from that heretical country, England, (as they generally call it,) among its numbers, and therefore it fell to my lot to be looked upon with more than usual interest. The superior once inquired of me, if my father and mother were Christians ? — a question which somewhat startled me, but which he afterward modified, by asking, if they were Roman Catholics ? I was not then aware that no Protestants, and more especially, no English Protestants, whom they honour so far as to call the "worst of heretics j 11 were esteemed by them Christians. I answered in the affirmative. He then inquired closely into the state of the Roman Catholic religion in Eng- land and Ireland, and of the number of monasteries in those countries ; wondering very much that so very few young men came from Ireland now-a-days to join his order; whereas, when he was a young man, and in the beginning of his ecclesiastical career — he was at this time about fifty-five — there were a great many young Irishmen his fellow students at Rome. He lamented, with appearance of great grief, the falling off of that once holy kingdom — the insula sanctorum — from the true faith, through, the apostasy (as he termed it) of Henry "VIII., and of Anna Boleyn. He then, turning to the other monks, who stood listening with open mouths, related the old threadbare story of the conversion of England by Austin, the monk, who was sent thither by the then holy father (the pope) Gregory ; not forgetting the equally old story of Venerable Bede's, about " non Angli, sed angeli, si tantum Christianifuissent" — " not English, but angels, if they were but Christians" — which must be familiar to every reader. The time for my taking the habit now drew nigh, and, it being rumoured through the town, that an Englishman was about to become a novice in the Capuchin order, the MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC 17 church was crowded to excess on the day appointed. The evening before, I made a general confession of the sins of my whole life to the superior, and was directed to look to the Madonna and entreat her intercession, in order to have the absolution, pronounced by him, the unworthy minister of God, (his own words,) here on earth, ratified in heaven. The ceremonies usually prac- tised on giving the habit to a novice, having in them something that may appear strange to the generality of readers in this country, it will not be thought foreign «to the subject to describe them. The superior, having put on the vestments used for celebrating mass, comes to the altar, attended by a deacon, subdeacon, and acolothists, and addresses the congrega- tion, stating the occasion of the ceremony, and perhaps also giving (as he did in my case) a brief history of the postulant. He then endeavours to draw a moral from the history, and to hold up the subject of it, as one worthy of imitation. After this he begins the mass, and proceeds with it as far as the gospel, when the postulant is brought forward by the deacon, dressed in as gaudy attire as can be procured for the occasion. The postulant prostrates himself at the foot of the altar, and at the feet of the superior, who bids him, in Latin, to arise and proclaim aloud what he wanted from the church of God. The questions and answers, used on this occasion, and of which the novice is warned beforehand, are here subjoined in the original Latin, with a literal translation for the satisfaction of those who do not understand that lan- guage :— Ques. Quid petis ab ecclesia Dei ? Res. Habitum Sancti Francisci. Ques. Quare habitum Sancti Francisci petis ? Res. Ut animam salvem. Ques. Quis te excitavit mundum fugere, et teipsum Deo sub regula Sancti Francisci vovere ? Res. Nullus ab externo : sed tantam sponte, Spiritu Sancto cooperante, hujus mundi pericula vidi, et ut e% facilius fugerem, sub regula Sancti Francisci militare volo. 3* 18 SIX YEARS IN THE Translation of the foregoing. Ques, What do you seek from the church of God ? Ans. The habit of St. Francis ! Ques. Why do you seek the habit of St. Francis ? Jlns. In order to save my soul. Ques. What has excited you to flee from the world, and to dedicate yourself to God under the rule of St. Francis ? Jlns. Nothing outwardly : but of my own accord, and through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, I have seen the dangers of the world, and in order to more easily escape them, I wish to be a soldier under the rule of St. Francis. The postulant is then stripped of his finery by the deacon and attendants, whilst the habit with which he is about to be clad, is placed before the superior on a silver salver, in order to be blessed by him and sprinkled with holy water. The blessing of the habit, which takes up five or six minutes, being finished, it is then handed over to the deacon, who puts it over the head and shoulders of the postulant, who kneels down to receive it, in token of greater devotion ; the superior in the mean time repeating the following : Sancti Francisci habitus ab omni diaboli impetu te custodiat ! May the habit of St. Francis guard you from all attacks of the cfevil ! Then a cord, of about half an inch in diameter, is produced, which, after having gone through the form of being blessed, is tied around the sides of the novice ; the superior repeating these words : Sancti Francisci cingula te ab omni libidine custodiat, et tefaciat castum anima et corpore. May the girdle or cord of St. Fran- cis guard you from lust, and render you chaste in soul and body. To all which prayers the attendants answer — Amen. The mass is then continued, till after the com- munion, when the novice is again brought forward by the deacon to receive the sacrament, which he does from the hands, or rather the fingers of the superior, who says, whilst in the act of putting the wafer into his mouth : Corpus Domini nostri, Jesu Christi, custodiat animam tuam in vitam eternam. Amen. May the body of our MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 19 Lord Jesus Christ keep your soul for eternal life. Amen. The mass is, after this, finished, and the choir chant the psalm "Ecce quam bonum, et quam fucundum habitare, fratres, in unum" — Behold ! what a pleasing, and vir- tuous thing it is, brothers, to live together ; whilst the newly vested novice is receiving the kiss of peace from his future brethren, who say, whilst kissing him "Pax tibi, frater charissime''' — Peace be with you, dearest brother. The day of giving the habit to a novice is • observed by the monks as a day of feasting and rejoicing. A sumptuous dinner is prepared for the occasion, and the friends and benefactors of the convent are invited to par- take of it. The monks exercise their talents for poetry by composing some pieces to be recited in the refectory during dinner, in praise of a monastic life, or in praise of the novice. Thus the day passes over amidst mirth and feasting, whilst the new-made monk retires to his room, fully content with his condition, and enthusiastic in his admiration of the manner of life he had that day chosen. Happy for him, if he continue so, or if he repent not before the expiration of a few months ! CHAPTER IV. Rule of St. Francis — Reasons for being unable to obtain a sight of it before receiving the habit — Tradition attached to it — Francis' conversation with the miraculous crucifix — Pope Honorius — Ca- nonically elected popes — Infallibility — Lents — Wonderful change of flesh — meat into fish. Being now clad in the livery of St. Francis, ar book containing the rules and constitutions of the order was placed at my disposal. Such a book I often before wished to see, and even begged a loan of it, more than once, from the superior ; but my request, though not flatly refused, was always evaded. They never show — such is their policy — the rules of the order to the uninitiated, or to those not clad in their habit, fearing, I suppose, that 20 SIX YEARS IN THE they might be injured in the public estimation, if the public became aware of the little harmony there is exist- ing between what they are, and what they ought to be, if they practised the rules laid down by their founder Francis. Be this as it may, I never could get a sight of the book containing these rules, until a few days after I had taken the habit, and when the monks well knew, in. the event of my not liking them, that I had gone too far to retract with honour ; though, indeed, I was still at liberty, and would be so for one year yet to come, until the day of my solemn profession, to retire from the order. There is a tradition attached to this book of rules, which will occasion a smile on the countenance of the reader. This is it : St. Francis, whilst fleeing from his father, who was very unwilling that his son should become a saint, retired for concealment to a mountain in the neighbourhood of Assisi, his native town. There he engaged in prayer and fasting for the space of forty days, say some, four only, say others — but it is all the same, there being as much truth in one as in the other. At the end of the forty, or four days, the crucifix before which he knelt, disengaging one of its hands from the wood to which it was nailed, suddenly became animated, and began to harangue Francis, and commanded him to insti- tute an order, for which a rule had been written in heaven. An angel then appeared, and, depositing a book in the hands of the crucifix, again vanished. The crucifix then stretched out and delivered the book to Francis, and immediately returned to its former position —an inanimate piece of wood. The foregoing story, carrying, as it does in itself, its own contradiction, is, nevertheless, often made the subject of a sermon in the Franciscan pulpits ; and so eagerly is the marvellous swallowed by a superstitious, uneducated peasantry, it has been the cause of bringing a great deal of wealth to the order, and of extolling it in the eyes of the public. It is frequently related in the confessional (where I for the first time heard it) by the monks to their penitents, and it is often believed by the narrators themselves, in the same MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 21 way as habitual liars sometimes believe their own false- hoods. To such pious frauds as this do. men resort in order to aggrandize themselves and their order ; men, too, who are under a solemn vow to despise the world, and even its most harmless pleasures, and to give themselves up entirely to the salvation of the souls of others and of their own. The rule of which we are speaking was originally written in Italian, and then, after some years, turned into monkish Latin, so barbarous, that it evidently shows, whatever be Francis' claims for the title of a saint, he had very little — indeed, none at all — for that of a scholar. It is indeed a curious specimen of composition, whether regarded in a literary or in a moral light. I am sorry that I have not a copy of it by me to make some extracts from, having unfortunately lost the one I had. The extracts, which I am about to give, will be understood, therefore, as drawn entirely from memory. It begins with the bull of Honorius III., the then reigning pope, confirming the order of the Friars Minor, the name which through humility the Franciscans first assumed. Nor did this show of humility want its due portion of policy. Francis and his companions were well aware, that the success of the order would be much injured, if they excited in the beginning the jealousy of the Benedictines, Augustinians, Carmelites, &c, all long established and powerful orders. To give no open cause then for their jealousy, they very prudently accomplished, by a show of humility, what they were well aware never could be brought about by open defiance. They therefore called themselves Minor- friars, or Friar-minors. Little did the other orders then imagine, that the poor, sheepish-looking Francis had more real cunning than his outward department would warrant, and that he was about to institute an order, which, like bad weeds in a garden, would soon spread itself through all Europe. Little did they imagine, that his followers would soon dispossess them of their pulpits, and of their chairs of theology, and transfer in the end to themselves that veneration in which they were held by the people. But who can dive into futurity ? Not even 22 SIX YEARS IN THE monks, however thaumaturgi, or miracle workers they may be ! We have seen, that the rule begins with the confirma- tion of the order by the then reigning pope, Honorius III. How that pope was brought to sanction the ravings of a man, who, by any person of sense, would be thought a madman, has connected with it another ridiculous story, which I shall take the liberty to mention here. It shows the pitiable stratagems, to which Francis and the pope too, as if an abettor, had recourse ; each, to consolidate his own authority — the one, the authority over his par- ticular followers, as their founder — the other, the author- ity, or at least, an argument in favour of that authority over the whole Christian world, as vicar of Christ. It seems, that in a second interview which Francis had with the animated crucifix, he was ordered to set out im- mediately for Rome, " and" — (Christ is blasphemously made the speaker,) " throwing thyself at the feet of my vicar, whom I have already prepared for thy coming, demand a confirmation of the rule which I have given thee." So saying, the crucifix remained silent. Francis, without the least hesitation, immediately set out for Rome, where arrived, he presented himself before the pontiff, who instantly embraced him, to the great surprise of the cardinals and his other attendants. The pope then re- lated the vision which he had seen the preceding night. "As I lay on my knees," said he, "after midnight, deeply engaged in prayer before the image of my Saviour, and supplicating him to inspire me with sufficient strength and prudence for the government of His holy church; behold, I saw in a vision, though broad awake, the church of St. John Lateran tottering, and this man — (pointing towards Francis on his knees) — dressed in the same habit in which he appears before us now, support- ing it with all his might, whilst in characters of fire were written over his head the words, « Vade, repara domum meain 9 — ' Go, and repair my house.' Francis then re- lated his conversation with the crucifix, and the command which he had received to proceed to Rome, and get his rule, which was written in heaven, confirmed on earth MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 23 by the vicar of Jesus Christ. The confirmation, as may- well be supposed, met with no obstacle, and thus was a beginning given to the Franciscan order. The foregoing stories, ridiculous as they certainly are, and many others still more ridiculous and equally marvellous, are to be found in the life of St. Francis, written by one of his fol- lowers. Let the reader then give them that degree of credence which he may deem them worthy of. The subject of the latter one is made the escutcheon engraved on the vicar-general's seal, of which I have an impression in my possession — St. Francis, holding his shoulder against the falling church of St. John Lateran, and the words " vade, repara domum meam" written over his head. The rule then continues to lay down certain regulations to be observed under pain of mortal sin by all those pro- fessed in the order. The principal one, and that upon which all the rest are based, is a blind, servile obedience to the reigning pope and his successors canonically elected. Now, the clause " canonically elected" is rather vague in its signification, and probably Francis, simple as he may appear to his co-visionary, Pope Honorius, suspected that popes were not always elected according to the canons. He therefore very honestly gives his followers the liberty of choosing between contending popes, or of remaining neutral, not acknowledging any pope at all, till they see to whom fortune or superior interest, disguised under the name of the "Holy Ghost" would finally give the popedom. The scandalous con- tentions for the popedom — a manifest sign, that the Holy Spirit, though formally invoked, has very little influence in the election — are so well known to every reader, that it is needless to make particular mention of them here. The contentions for that dignity, when the holy see was transferred to Avignon, and when there existed at one and the same time three popes, excommunicating and. damning one another, may serve as an example of the infallibility of the infallible men who are elected to it. Three infallibles at one and the same time, and each condemning the infallible bulls and edicts promulgated 24 . SIX YEARS IN THE by his infallible opponents ! Strange indeed, but such is popery. In another chapter, it lays down the number of lents to be observed in the year, and the manner in which these lents ought to be observed. The lents are three : one of seven weeks, observed, or at least commanded to be observed, by the whole Romish church ; though such a command, I am glad to see, is meeting with deserved neglect in most parts of Europe, except Ireland, and there also, among the educated classes of Roman Catho- lics — so true it is, that education is the bane of popery, and where the former prevails, the latter is put to flight, for it is as easy to unite fire and water as information and popery. The second of two months, from All Saints' day (1st of November) to Christmas, called by the monks, "la quaresima di merito," or the meritorious lent. The third of forty days, which begins some days after the Epiphany. This last is called " la quaresima benedetla" or the blessed lent, because Francis did not command it to be observed under pain of mortal sin, but yet left his blessing to those who observe it. Thus is fasting, though neither good nor bad in itself, rendered by this madman execra- ble, as being made the means of acquiring merit, and thereby salvation, whilst the blessed doctrine of obtain- ing it through the vicarious atonement and merits of Christ, is not once thought upon. The rigour with which lent should be observed, is perhaps intended to be pointed out by the following story, related in the life of St. Francis : One day in lent, Francis and his companion were travelling — on foot to be sure — in the province of Umbria, for the purpose of founding convents. They were fasting all that day, nor would they partake of any food, lest they should break through the holy fast, though frequently invited to do so by those upon whom they called in the way of business. Evening drawing nigh, they were obliged to take up their lodgings at the house of a vicious nobleman, who, however he may conceal it, was a secret enemy of Francis and his institute. At supper, there MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 25 was nothing placed upon the table before the holy man and his companion but flesh-meat. The companion looked towards his master to see how he should act, and his hair stood on end with astonishment, when he positively saw him eating what was set before him. Knowing, how- ever, that the saint never acted without good reasons, he said nothing, but silently imitated the example given him. His host, who stood on the watch with some of his vicious companions, immediately burst out into laughter, and called in his neighbours to expose the hypocrite, as he called the holy man. Francis, not in the least disturbed, made the sign of the cross on the table, and in the twin- kling of an eye, the meat — capons, turkeys, and all — was turned into herrings ; and even the bones of what he had already eaten became bones of fish ! This was a miracle indeed ! But some monks have nothing else to do than inventing such trash. The story is made, how- ever, to serve its own purposes. It impresses the ne- cessity of abstaining from certain meats during a certain time in order to obtain favour with God, and strengthens that necessity by bringing Francis, whom all acknow- ledge a saint, forward as an example. This is nothing else but preaching the anti-scriptural doctrine of the dis- tinction of meats, so fondly adhered to by the church of Rome, and the bringing of Francis on the stage, is but showing an example of obedience to that doctrine. Again, the miracle of changing flesh-meat into herrings, is but proving, by a miracle, how acceptable such a doctrine is to God. CHAPTER V. Continuation of the rule — Monkish vow of poverty — How observed — Anecdote of a Carmelite — Masses — Obedience — Education of Novices — An ass turned into an ox — The tree of obedience. In another chapter of the book of rules, the friars are not only exhorted, but positively commanded " to have neither lands, nor houses? nor money , either in common 4 26 SIX YEARS IN THE or for individual use — but to depend entirely on the charity of the faithful for subsistence." They are com- manded to go "from door to door" (da uscio in uscio, are the express words of Francis,) " begging — not money, which they are prohibited from touching, but — provi- sions." This part of the rule is now entirely disregarded, and was, from the very beginning of the Franciscan insti- tute, and in the days of Francis himself — a pretty sample of obedience to the precepts of a rule, which he impiously gave out to be written by God himself. It is well known, that no people are so fond of money as monks, and none make so little use of it for the good of society in general. Absolute poverty, which they swear, yes, solemnly swear to observe, and live in, is openly and in the face of the public set at naught ; most convents having lands and rents attached to them for their support. Thus is the command at once broken through by them, considered as a community or body. The latter part — that of " begging from door to door — for provisions" — is indeed observed in part, and only in part, for they take money, if offered. It is continued chiefly more for the purpose of giving the world an idea of their poverty and humility, than through any absolute want they feel of such assistance. They have also a good income — paid always in money, mind — from the many masses daily celebrated in their churches, according to the intention of the highest bidder. The atonement of Christ set up for auction ! mark that, reader. These masses are mostly said in aid of the souls in purga- tory, which, whatever it be as a place of punishment to its inmates, is certainly the source of many enjoyments to its turnkeys, and has been justly called the pope's bank — a bank, indeed, which will never stop payment as long as the reign of superstition lasts. Masses are ofte^ said likewise, according to the intention of some swindler and assassin, who wishes to implore God's blessing on his nefarious undertakings. Some sincere, though mis- taken believers in their efficacy, also pay for masses to be said for some virtuous intention ; but these are rare cases, and if monks depended upon their frequent occur- MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 27 rence for support, they O father, to observe, during my whole life, the rule of the Minor Friars, by our Lord Pope Honorius confirmed ; and to live in obedience, in poverty, and in chastity.) The superior then says, still keeping the novice's hands enclosed in his own : — Ed io, da parte di Dio, se queste cose osserverai, ti prometto la vita eterna." (And I, on the part of God, promise thee eternal life, if thou wilt keep these pro- mises.) The other monks answer, " Amen." The new professed after this receives the kiss of peace from his brethren, whilst the choir is chanting the psalm, " Ecce quam bonum, et quam jucundum, habitare, fratres, in unum." (How good and pleasant it is, brethren, to live together.) The day of profession, like that of taking the MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 83 habit, is observed as a festival by the monks ; and many friends being invited to a sumptuous entertainment, it passes over in the same way as the latter, amidst mirth and jollity, their usual method of showing forth gladness on extraordinary occasions ; though it may be presumed, that the sight of a good dinner has as much tendency, perhaps more, to excite their mirth, as the addition of a new member to their community. The day of profession is an era in the life of a monk from which he may date either the happiness or misery of his future life ; understanding for the moment happi- ness and misery in the sense of those, who place it in the enjoyment or non-enjoyment of the things of this world. If he be a good monk ; that is, if he forget all the duties which he owes to society ; if he exert all his powers and talents to promote one great object — the good of the order ; if, in order to more speedily arrive at this end, he endeavour, pro virili, to brutalize the minds of the people by teaching them the fables and other mon- strous absurdities invented by Rome to maintain her sway over them, if he do all these things, he may be sure of being esteemed a good and faithful monk, and may reasonably expect to lead a happy life, as far as worldly honours and ecclesiastical dignities can make it so. If, on the other hand, he be troubled with a rather deli- cate conscience ; that is, if he dare examine for himself, whether the things he is commanded to do for the good of the order be strictly just ; or if, on becoming better acquainted with it, he refuse to exert himself to the utmost for its advantage ; if in his sermons he manifest a greater zeal for bringing sinners to repentance, than in making panegyrics on saints ; if he preach Christ and him cru- cified as the sinner's hope, instead of directing him to the intercession of the Madonna, St. Francis, or of some other saint ; if, in fine, he act in this guise, it is more than probable, nay, it is an absolute certainty, that his life will be rendered miserable ; he will be treated as a heretic, as one unfaithful to his vows, and as one who considers the good of the order of no consequence, and therefore necessarily a bad monk. He will be persecuted 84 SIX YEARS IN THE by his fellow monks, his actions and words will be strictly watched, in order to find a pretext for suspending him from his clerical functions : this pretext, because de- sired, will be soon found, and then he is transported from convent to convent, or exiled to some remote part of the province, where he will be confined to the bounds of the cloister, or, at least, to the garden, detested by all and esteemed by none. His life will thus pass away between vexations and oppressions, and while cursing his unfor- tunate condition, he will date his misery from the day he first forfeited his liberty at the foot of the altar, when making a solemn vow to observe things, which, he is convinced by farther examination, are in themselves sinful, because contrary to the precepts of the gospel, and at variance with the institutes by which society is kept together. The foregoing is a true picture, drawn from experience, of the life of a good and bad monk. Heretics, I fear, will regard the latter — God help their judgment! — as more deserving the epithet of "good" than the former. ConceclOy be it granted, but then "good" should not be coupled with the substantive " monk" for, as metaphysi- cians say " omne ens est bonum quoad se" (every being is good as to itself,) so also, the latter may be good "quoad hominem" but bad, very bad "quoad ens" that is, as to his profession of a monk. But, metaphy- sical reasoning apart, it is evident, that a good monk means one of the genus " homo" who is half-Christian and whole-idolater, (excuse the bull,) who idolizes his order, and fixes all his hopes of salvation in the merits to be acquired by benefiting it ; who stops at nothing to at- tain that end ; and who, if Christ and his religion should at any time have a place in his thoughts, regards them as things of secondary consideration, and to be placed next in rank, or at farthest on a par with Francis and his rule.* * The above will, perhaps, be considered by many as amplification ; thinking it impossible, that any body of men, who go under the name of Christians, could, whatever be the errors of their doctrines, so far forget themselves as to rank Christ and his gospel with their own in- ventions. But let those who argue thus, examine the page of history, MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 85 A. bad monk, on the other hand — and would to God, there were more of such monks — is he, who not being wholly dead to all sense of religion, wishes to act con- scientiously toward God and toward his fellow men, leaving to others the office of benefiting the order ; espe- cially when that cannot be done without trampling under foot the duties he owes to God and to society. He con- siders his obligations to the latter of far greater moment than those he is under to his order, and therefore endea- vours to fulfil them, though at the same time he is injur- ing the interests of the former ; for the particular interest of his order seldom or never can be promoted but at the expense and subversion of society and of religion. Who then would hesitate to choose between serving God, by executing His commands, relative to the duties due to •where they will find recorded the diabolical, enthusiastic frenzy of the Franciscans of the fourteenth century, who impiously maintained that the founder of their order was a second Christ, in all respects similar to the first ; and that their institutions and discipline were the true gospel of Jesus. History also informs us, that a Franciscan monk of the name of Albizi, a native of Pisa, published a book in 1383, — and with the applause and permission of his order too, re- member, — whereby he compares Saint Francis, that madman and im- postor, with Jesus Christ, the Lord and giver of life ; and that farrago of absurdities — the rale of St. Francis — with the Christian's treasure, the holy gospels themselves! ! — But why should we make so great a wonder of simple theories, when we are so indifferent to the practice of them, placed before our eyes daily 1 Do we not see Christ and his atonement continually and every hour postponed to human inven- tions, even in this very country, where the gospel is said to triumph 1 To what else do all the anti-scriptural tenets of popery tend, than to draw off the attention of Christians from the all-sufficient atonement of Christ, in order to fix it upon something else — to fix it upon the adoration of the creature, instead of the Creator — by which the inventors of such tenets are benefited, though at the expense of the souls of those committed to their charge 1 Yet people, who would be startled at the simple theory, pass over, as trifles, practices, hideous practices of this nature ; people pass them over as things too common to be any longer wondered at, or even worthy of remark ; and cha- ritably doubt, whether such abuses be not rather the effects of unde- signed corruption than of any fixed theory. — Indeed, it is to be fear- ed, that charity is but too often another name for indifference for the truth, as it is in Jesus. 9 86 SIX YEARS IN THE Himself and to His other creatures ; and serving Mam- mon, by providing for the interests of Mammon. This hesitation, however, in choice is made by the good monk ; or rather the service of Mammon is chosen without any hesitation ; while the bad monk chooses the service of his Creator, and therefore is characterized by the other with the epithet of "bad," and unfaithful to his vows. The story of a young man, who was for many years the victim of monkish persecutions, and with whom I had a short acquaintance before his escape from the iron grasp of monachism, has in it something so appropriate to the present subject, that I cannot refrain from relating it. He was a native of Chambery, the capital of Savoy. At the agfe of sixteen, he crossed the Alps and went to Turin, where he embraced the monastic life under the rule of St. Francis. He passed through the year of pro- bation without having had any difficulty thrown in his way by which he could be deterred from continuing in that state, and at the expiration of the accustomed time, he was solemnly professed. He then began the study of philosophy, and although the course of metaphysics — that part of philosophy, most studied by the monks, be- cause the most incomprehensible — which he was obliged to read, is carefully adapted to substantiate the doctrines of the Romish church ; he found, notwithstanding, his belief, not only in that church, but also in Christianity itself, weakened by making use of his reasoning powers. It is true, he knew Christianity only in the corrupt form under which it appears in the church of Rome : he was wholly ignorant of Bible Christianity, and therefore more worthy of excuse on that account ; especially when he had no one to direct him to the fountain of life. The poison of infidelity stole imperceptibly over his mind, and he had scarcely finished his course of philosophy before he found himself a confirmed skeptic. He grew lukewarm in his belief of the ridiculous doctrines of Romanism, and however his station in life obliged him to conceal it, he secretly laughed at the foolish inventions of that church. The study of popish theology — and in- deed it deserves the name of popish rather than that of MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 87 Christian — only directed his unbelief into another chan- nel ; for it led him to see, though indistinctly, that there was some foundation for Christianity, but that it was cor- rupted by those who had the government of Christ's church in their hands. This he learned, partly from the objections made to the innovations of the church of Rome by scriptural Christians, and which are set down in the School Theology in order to be answered ; and partly from the detached portions of Scripture, which are scat- tered up and down in the breviary. He now began to pant after the liberty of worshipping God according to the dictates of his conscience ; but alas ! he was bound, and in the chains of monastic slave- ry, which were more tolerable to him while he was an infidel, than now, when he saw the truth and could not embrace it. He was ordained in the mean time, and sent to preach some time after, to a town on the Alps, called Susa. Here he endeavoured to preach Christ and him crucified to the people, instead of enforcing devotion to the Madonna. On being requested by the parish priest to preach a panegyric in honour of the patron saint of the town, he could not refuse ; but acquitted himself in so awkward a manner, and in so very few words, changing his discourse to his favourite theme of redemption through Christ, that he incurred the displeasure of the priest, who boldly accused him of heresy. The same priest imme- diately wrote to his superior in Turin, requesting that he might be removed ; and giving his reasons for the request. He was accordingly recalled. Upon his arrival at Turin he was summoned before a chapter of his order, to give an account of his conduct. He endeavoured to excul- pate himself as well as he could ; simply stating facts as they were. When asked why he had not preached the panegyric, as he was requested to do by the parish priest ; he replied, that he was unacquainted with the life of the patron saint, and therefore had no materials wherewith to compose one ; and that his conscience would not per- mit him to draw from his own imagination — the general plan adopted by those who preach panegyrics on saints. This excuse was deemed insufficient, and he was there- 88 SIX YEARS IN THE fore formally suspended from the office of preaching, as being a person suspected of unsound doctrines. Now began his life of misery. Every action, every word of his was strictly watched. He was sent from convent to convent, through almost every part of the province, and could find no place wherein he could get a moment's repose from the persecutions of his brethren. He was looked upon by all as one who was a disgrace to their order, and who was unwilling to labour for its advantages. At length, tired out and harassed from such unrelenting persecutions, he determined upon escaping to Rome, in order to lay his case before the general of the order. If he stirred one step without a written leave from his local superior, he would be considered by the rules of the order an apostate ; and punished as such accordingly. He, nevertheless, although well aware of the existence of such a law, chose rather to run the risk than be any longer exposed to the unremitting persecu- tion of his adversaries. Upon his arrival at Rome, he was forthwith imprisoned by order of the general ; the superior at Turin having written before him for that pur- pose, stating his suspicions that he was not a person of sound Roman Catholic doctrines. He was now sus- pended from celebrating mass, and kept a close prisoner for three months, while in the mean time his family was spending money in petitioning the pope to have his case investigated. When these petitions on the part of his friends came to the knowledge of the general, they only served to increase the rigour with which the unfortunate young man was treated ; for nothing is thought so crimi- nal in a monk as to appeal to another tribunal from that of his own order. Being at last, through the interest of a cardinal, who had a friendship for his family, permitted to plead his own cause, he ably and forcibly exposed to the ecclesiastical court the wrongs and injuries which had been done him, and the absolute necessity he was under of leaving Turin, even at the hazard of being thought an apostate ; because he could no longer bear with the unchristian treatment and violent persecutions with which he was pursued by his brother monks. He con- MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 89 eluded his address by entreating the court for permission to supplicate the pope for the purpose of obtaining a dis- pensation from his vows, and of being permitted to leave the order altogether; after having obtained letters of secularization* from his holiness. His request was granted, though not without experiencing some difficulty, and after his being kept three months longer in prison, (in all six months,) and after his friends had spent more than eight hundred Roman scudi (about eight hundred and fifty American dollars) in petitioning the papal court. He retired after his release to his native town of Chambery, whence, as I afterward heard, he passed into Switzer- land, where he now remains, a minister of the reformed church and a faithful preacher of the gospel. The latter part of his story I have learned some time since from an Irish gentleman who spent some years in Switzerland, and who was acquainted with him there. He describes him as a zealous and pious Christian, and as one who is a living example of the power of divine grace and of the various means used by God to bring his own to a closer union with himself. The foregoing story may give the reader some idea of the hardship and misery to which a monk reduces him- self, who wishes to do his duty toward God and toward his fellow men. If an enlightened mind, assisted by the divine influence, should show him the errors of the reli- gion of which he is a member and minister ; and if his conscience should afterward prevent him from being sub- servient to the propagation of error, he may expect to be treated as rigorously, and suffer the same hardships, as the subject of the foregoing narrative. Should he re- * Secularization means a brief granted by the pope to a monk, whereby he is permitted to leave his order, and live as a secular priest under the obedience of a bishop. This is with great difficulty obtained, and is always attended with great expense ; money being necessary to bribe the different officers who surround the papal throne, and who consider themselves entitled to a share of the plun- der with which his holiness fills his coffers. The income derived by the court of Rome from the sale of briefs, bulls, and dispensations is enormous. — But of this, more in another place. 9* 90 SIX YEARS IN THE fuse to fulfil the wishes of the superior, and be backward in working for the good of the order, because he regards the means of benefiting it as injurious to his neighbour, and offensive to God ; he is then persecuted, imprisoned, and calumniated ; he obtains the name of a bad monk, and is set down by his fellow monks as one who had broken his vows, and who dares to set up his own judg- ment in opposition to the will of those to whom he had promised implicit obedience, when he made his solemn profession at the foot of the altar. Very few, it must be confessed, are of this description. Some, perhaps, who see the errors in which they live, are careless in correct- ing them, and do not wish to bring themselves into diffi- culties. Some there are who see the errors of their ways, also, but are very far from believing in Christianity under any form ; they therefore conform themselves out- wardly to the state of a monk, and find themselves the gainers by it ; for from this class the superiors are chosen. Others again, whom we shall distinguish by the name of the brute creation of monkery, can be found, who are too ignorant to discover error, and therefore swallow every doctrine, which is proposed to their belief, - with the greatest avidity. These obey their superiors in every thing, and stop at nothing, be it ever so contrary to common honesty, when their commands and the good of the order push them on. From this class, the saints are manufactured. The fourth class is composed of those whom we have already distinguished by the name of " bad monks" and whose description has been given more fully in the beginning of this chapter. Those who see their errors, but are cold in correcting them, would probably make good Christians in a free country, where they might have the liberty of choosing for themselves ; but while they live under papal bondage, there is but little hbpe of their ever emerging from the sink of indif- ference. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 91 CHAPTER XIV. Convents of study — The employment, in which those monks who are void of talents are engaged — Monastic studies — Logic — Me- taphysics — Its use in supporting popish doctrines — Dogmatic theo- logy — Its evil tendency — Mutilation of Scripture — Purgatory — Popish theologians — Polemical divinity — Character of popish polemics — How they excuse themselves — Moral theology — Auri- cular confession — Its instrumentality in the support of priestcraft. The young monk is immediately sent away after pro- fession, from the convent in which he passed his novi- tiate, or year of probation, and placed in another, which is called a convent of study — in Italian " convento di studio." There are in each province* many convents of this kind, situated for the most part in fertile and rich sections of the country. There are also various classes of convents for study. One convent is fitted up for the study of philosophy ; another for that of dogmatic the- ology*,* another again for the study of moral theology. These classes are again subdivided into others : some are set apart for the education of those young monks, who were remarked during the year of probation to be possessed of talents superior to their fellow novices ; some others are chosen for those, who, though not hav- ing very brilliant talents, are, nevertheless, likely to be of advantage to the order, as executioners of the plans laid down by those who are gifted with superior capa- city. There are also other convents, in which the herd of monks ; i. e. those we have distinguished by the appellation of " the brute creation of monkery" — are huddled together. These monks are scarcely above the * It should have been before remarked, that, according to monkish geography, a province is that portion of a country which is under the control, as to monastic affairs, of a certain superior called " Pro- vincial" Every order has its own provincial, and therefore there a^ as many provincials as orders in a province. The pope's domi- i us in Italy comprise four monastic provinces. 92 9IX YEARS IN THE level of brutes in their intellectual powers, and are chiefly employed — for they are unfit for any thing else — « in mumbling over offices, and in repeating Ave Marias before the image of a Madonna. They are, however, while young, sent to a separate convent, where they are taught to write their own language grammatically, though but few have talents enough to succeed even in that ; and where they are taught to acquire a smattering of Latin, by translating into barbarous Italian the council of Trent, the general school-book of this class, because classical Latin is too difficult for them. They are then, after being a little humanized by instruction, scattered through the other convents of the province, in order to serve as a cloak for the conduct of those of their breth- ren, whose talents and understanding do not allow them to be so beastly devout. These are held in great esteem by the common people, for they have always in readi- ness some marvellous tale, or some miracle to relate to them, by which they increase their love and respect for the order. After death a great many of them are enrolled in the catalogue of saints — thus verifying* the proverb " ignorance is the mother of devotion," by deifying after death men who, while living, were not a hair's breadth above their fellow creatures, the brutes, in intellectual capacity. As for myself, I was sent, after profession, to Rome, and placed under the tuition of a professor, who was esteem- ed the most learned man of the order at that time. And here, it will not be thought, I hope, foreign to the present subject, if I give a succinct account of monastic studies, and of the manner in which such studies are conducted. I give it the more willingly, because it may be of use to do away with the erroneous notions of some, who are loud in their praises of the great learning and talents which they imagine — and it is pure imagination — can be found within the walls of a convent. The account is drawn from my own experience, and from observations made during the time I remained in the monastic state. Logic is the first branch of knowledge to which a monk applies himself, on commencing his preparations MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 93 for fulfilling the duties which are afterward to devolve upon him in the course of his clerical career. On this, indeed, his future progress in the other studies chiefly depend, for they are all carried on in the old, scholastic, syllogistical method. He is supposed to have a perfect knowledge of the Latin classics before entering the order; though such a supposition doe^ not always correspond with truth. Many pass through the examination, usually required before being received into the order, more by chance, and the partiality of the examiners, than on account of any perfect knowledge they possess of the things in which they are examined. Those, however, who are smuggled into the order in this way, usually take their place among the herd I have before described The treatise on logic, which is used in monkish schools, is always in Latin. It is generally the composition of some monk, and is delivered in a clear, methodical style, and very easy to be understood — even by those of mode- rate capacities. The part which is most dwelt upon, is that wherein rules are laid down for arguing syllogis- tically. Indeed the whole treatise is manifestly designed as a key, with which to open the abstruse and metaphy- sical reasoning of the schoolmen, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, Bonaventure, and such like. Besides the simple rules, the students are also taught the best manner of putting them in practice, by holding frequent disputations among themselves ; and he is thought the best logician who can bring his opponent to give assent to a proposi- tion manifestly erroneous, or who can satisfactorily prove that two contradictory propositions can be both true at one and the same time. After having spent a considerable time and much labour in becoming master of the various kinds of argu- ments, and in reducing them to practice by continual exercise among themselves ; the next thing to which their attention is directed, is the study of metaphysics. In this also much time is spent, for metaphysics is a species of knowledge held in great repute among monks, and it requires a long time, and great application, to get even a partial knowledge of the subtleties, the distinc- 94 SIX YEARS IN THE tions, the sub-distinctions, and. divisions, which are almost innumerable in this abstruse science, rendered still more abstruse by the obscurity in which it is en- veloped by the imaginations — any thing but clear — of those who wrote upon it. Treatises and volumes are written upon things which, when fully discussed, leave the reader no wiser than before ; nor would it be of any importance, either to religion or society, whether the same things were ever thought upon or not, or whether they should be one way rather than in another. Thus, a folio volume — yes, a huge folio ! — has been written by some idle monk, who had nothing else to do, upon the questions, " whether nothing was created?" or " whether God, omnipotent as he is, could, with all his unlimited power, create nothing?" Nor ought it to be a subject for wonder, that this science is held in so great estima- tion by monks, whereas the dogmas and tenets of their religion, especially those that have no scriptural argu- ments in their favour, are, in a great measure, propped by arguments drawn from if, and rendered thereby as in- comprehensible as a fear of detection could desire them. Demonology, or the treatise on demons, whether good or bad, is designedly fitted up for the purpose of sup- porting the modern doctrine of purgatory — I call it mo- dern, as not being^ either known or thought upon in the first ages of the church. The different parts, also, into which metaphysics is divided, as ontology, psychology, demonology, and the other ologies, are the whetstones on which their minds are sharpened to defend, and even to invent, new doctrines and dogmas, which are after- ward held up as articles of faith to a benighted people. The attention bestowed by them upon physics is very limited, scarcely passing the bare knowledge of the first properties of bodies. Astronomy is studied hardly at all, and the mathematics, though studied, are yet passed over in so superficial a manner, that a child at one of the common schools in America would be able to puzzle many a professor of them, while endeavouring to demon- strate a proposition of Euclid. The reason why geome- try is so little studied probably may be, because they are MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 95 unwilling to accustom the minds of the monks to mathe- matical demonstrations, lest they should look for the same on other subjects. The foregoing studies are considered but a prelude to the study of dogmatical theology. To this point all others tend, and to acquire a perfeet knowledge of this, monks spare neither time nor labour. It being that which properly belongs to their profession, they endeavour to acquire a thorough knowledge of it, and if their individual talents keep*pace with their perseverance, they generally succeed. It has been remarked, that "monks of the least exemplary life are generally the best theologians." This remark has certainly its foundation in truth, for the name of "good theologian" is a passport to arrive at the highest honours of the order, and therefore the ambitious, who are very seldom void of talents, direct all the ener- gies of their minds to the acquisition of that which will be the probable means of satisfying their darling passion. It must not be supposed, however, that a greater know- ledge of God and his attributes, which a good theologian is supposed to possess, necessarily includes also a greater love for God himself. This would probably be the case, if the object for which theology is studied was the ad- vancement of God's kingdom, and not the exaltation of self; but the latter being manifestly the real object, the knowledge derived from it never goes farther than the understanding, and is therefore incapable of touching the heart. Besides, the theology of the church of Rome is in itself corrupt, and has a strong tendency to make the student forget the subject of it — or what at least ought to be the subject of it — God ; while his mind is employed in un- ravelling the intricate and disputable doctrines, which, not having any foundation in revelation, are enveloped in obscure and unusual forms of expression. The authority of Thomas Aquinas, called the " angelic doctor," or of the " seraphic doctor" Bonaventure, are esteemed by them of equal weight with the express words of revela- tion. Texts of Scripture, without their contexts, which would bestow on them a very different meaning from thai 96 SIX YEARS IN THE which they bear when they stand alono, are brought forward in support of some particular tenets ; while all and every subject is treated on after the old, syllogistic method, which confounds the understanding without in- creasing the love for God, or implanting in the mind a desire of being guided by the divine influence of the Spirit of truth. The portions of Scripture which are brought forward to strengthen any particular doctrine are all mutilated, that is, such as, taking them apart from the context, seem to favour the doctrine which is disputed upon ; but if there can be no portion found, which however twisted and turned, yet still refuses to answer the occasion, then the doctrine is established on the strength of tradition, or on. the " ipse dixit" of a pope ; and not unfrequently on quotations from the apocryphal writings. Thus — -and let one example serve for all, as this book is not designed for controversy, but for a simple history of things as they are — the doctrine of purgatory is defended by arguments taken from tradition, not even excepting pagan, Jewish, and Mahometan, for, indeed, popish theologians are not over delicate in selecting their authorities, provided these authorities favour their views. Quotations are then taken for its support from the Apocrypha, especially from 2 Maccabees xxi. 43 — 45, and after these, they endeavour to make the New Testament speak in its favour, quoting from Matt. xii. 31, 32. 1 Cor. iii. 15. 1 Pet. iii. 19. They care but little that the books of Maccabees have no evidence of inspiration ; they answer their ends, and therefore are adopted. The quotations from the New Testament, upon examining the context, will be found to favour as much the metempsychosis of Pope Pythagoras, as the purgatory of Pope Joan. It will be no wonder, then, to find theologians any thing but pious men, when such a system of theology as that we have been describing, is taken into consideration Indeed, they seem conscious themselves of this want of piety ; as may be gathered from their condemning many propositions, which were probably designed for them, by the friends of vital godliness. Thus, the negative answers MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 97 to the following questions are condemned by them as heretical. " Whether the religious knowledge acquired by a wicked man can be termed theology ?" " Whether a vicious person can in effect obtain a true knowledge of religion I" " Whether the office and ministry of an im- pious ecclesiastic can be pronounced salutary and effica- cious ?" " Whether a licentious and ungodly man can be susceptible of divine illumination ?" These and many such like propositions are condemned in the usual form, as "scandalous, heretical, smelling of heresy, offensive to pious ears," Src, by those who fear for themselves, and feel conscious, that if they were not condemned, they themselves would be no longer neither theologians, nor religionists, nor efficacious priests, nor susceptible of divine illumination The polemical divinity of the church of Rome, under which head are classed the works of all those who en- deavour to defend the doctrines of that church against the reasonings and scriptural objections of the friends of the gospel, is also studied with great attention by monastic orders. There are professorships established in two, and sometimes four places of every province, where all those young monks, who are in possession of superior talents, are sent to learn the manner of defending their religion against the attacks of heretics. It frequently happens that the young men chosen for this study are already far gone in infidelity, and therefore laugh in their own minds, and even among themselves, at the idea of being made defenders of a religion in which they do not believe. The metaphysical reasonings of dogmatical theology, united to the fables of the breviary, were the chief means of leading them into infidelity, while it is very probable that the study of polemics will give them a knowledge of reformed Christianity, and thereby make them suspect that Christianity might possibly be true, though it had been corrupted by the church of which they are members. This, however, does not always happen. Those who are confirmed infidels, only find new arguments i» favour of the religion of nature, by becoming acquainted with the numerous sects and parties into which Christianity is 10 98 SIX YEARS IN THE divided, and laugh at them all accordingly. Being obliged for self-preservation to dissemble their real opinions, they imagine that they cannot show their zeal for the Roman Catholic religion in a better way, than by impugning the doctrines of g'ospel Christians, and defending those of popery ; " for if it be necessary," they argue thus, " that Christianity should exist, it is preferable for us to stand fast in that particular kind of it to which we are pro* fessionally engaged, and from which benefits accrue to us, than to interest ourselves in any other to which we are equally indifferent, and from which we can expect nothing but persecution and hardships — the sure consequences of leaving that by which we get our living." Others there are, who become cured of infidelity ; yet fear to openly embrace the doctrines of the Bible. They pant after the freedom of worshipping God according to the dictates of their consciences, and anxiously wait for an opportunity of throwing off the yoke of monkery and popery, without running any personal risk. They, in the mean time, until such an opportunity presents itself, endeavour to separate Christianity from the dust, with which it is enveloped in the church of Rome, and while conforming themselves outwardly to all the practices of that church, they inwardly, as far as they are able, serve God according to the way he has marked out in his holy word. Their sermons and other clerical duties are not performed for the purpose of increasing the adherents of the church of Rome, or of propagating its particular tenets ; but for that of drawing sinners to repentance, and to an unadulterated knowledge of Christ, at least as far as they can do so without exciting suspicion. Of this description of monks was the young man of Chambery, whose sufferings and final triumph have been already re- lated. Many more also of the same kind might be found, who only wait for an opportunity to regain their liberty, in order to become pious and zealous Christians, and faithful preachers of the gospel of salvation. Moral theology is the last in order, though not in im- portance, of monastic studies. By this monks are fitted to stand up in the place of Christ in the confessional, and MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 99 to weigh with scrupulous nicety the degree of sinfulness attached to the words, actions, and even thoughts of those who are so foolish or so led astray, as to trust to the ab- solution pronounced by them for the pardon and remission of their sins. By this, they are taught the way of bring- ing the minds of the people wholly under their control, and of exercising the acquired influence to the advantage of their order and of themselves. Of all the corruptions in the corrupt system of popish corruptions, this is the most corrupt. As preachers of corrupt doctrines, their in- fluence over the people would never pass the bounds of moderation, as doctrines that fear the light cannot be so well promulgated in a public church — and by such chiefly is their influence acquired ; but by the institution of au- ricular confessions they have acquired ingress into the minds and souls oT each individual, and never fail, after becoming master of their secrets, to turn and direct the current of their thoughts and actions to one great object— a firm reliance on the truth and infallibility of the church of Rome ; which reliance being once established, they can then turn the minds of their penitents to do any thing, however offensive to God, which, according to them, may be of advantage to the church. The miserable man who had been excited to assassinate Henry IV. of France by a Jesuit confessor, may be an example of the truth of this observation. Very probably the assassin was a supersti- tious bigot, and the representations of his confessor, who well knew how to work on his weak mind, excited his frenzy against the king, whom he was led to believe a heretic, and an enemy of religion. He therefore ima- gined, that so far from offending God by killing a heretical king, he was only acquiring merit, and doing an action which would be very pleasing to the Supreme Being. On auricular confession is founded the vulgar belief of the great power of priests. It is natural for the human mind to regard with a degree of veneration the person of one, who, it is led to think, represents the person of Jesus Christ, in his ministerial office, and who has the faculty of forgiving or retaining the sins of the people. The priests, well aware of this delusion, under which the 100 SIX YEARS IN THE people lie, let no opportunity slip of increasing 1 it, and while tete*a-tete and alone with their penitents, they have every opportunity of inculcating, without fear of contra- diction, the most absurd doctrines, and of giving them at the same time a most exalted idea of their own power and greatness. CHAPTER XV. Continuation of remarks upon moral theology — Mortal and venial sins — Precepts of the church — Prohibition to sell flesh-meat on Fridays and Saturdays — Punishment of those who transgress the precept of fasting — Confession and communion — Sentence of excommunication — Number of popish sacraments — The Eucha- rist — Anathema of the Council of Trent Sgainst all who deny the Real Presence — Absurdity of that doctrine — One hundred thousand Christs created every day — Popish inventions for the sup- port of the doctrine of Transubstantiation — The miraculous cor- poral — Miraculous particle — State of the Jews at Rome — A mule's testimony to the truth of the Real Presence — Anecdote of Rabe- lais — Sale of masses — Cost of a high mass — Reflections — The treatise upon oaths — No faith to be kept with heretics — Dispens- ing power of priests — Murder of Protestant clergymen in Ire- land — Jesuitical morality. This moral theology, the principal use of which I have endeavoured to give an idea of above, is in itself a huge mass of opinions given by monks, friars, and other kinds of priests, on the tendency the actions of their fel- low creatures have to hinder or give claims to salvation. If all the books which were written on this subject were gathered together, they would probably amount to some thousands of volumes ! As it is, they cannot be digested, even for school use, into a less compass than two large octavos. The whole system is evidently founded on two unscriptural tenets : salvation by works ; thereby render- ing of no avail free salvation through the merits of Christ ; and the equally unscriptural doctrine of the distinction between sins ; some being denominated mortal, and others venial. By reason of this distinction of sins, the vari- ous ways in which man may transgress against the Su- MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 101 preme Being and against his laws, and the various degrees of sinfulness attached to such transgressions, are examined with the greatest exactness. One of the treatises, (the whole is divided into separate treatises,) and a long one it is too — is taken up in examining the ends of men's actions ; that is, of the motives for which such actions are performed. According then, as such actions, though es- sentially good or bad in themselves, may be performed for a good or evil end or motive, or as one or the other may predominate in them, they are pronounced either mortal or venial, indifferent or neutral, by those self-constituted judges between man and his God. Let the assassination of Henry IV., to which allusion has been made in the last chapter, serve for an example in illustration. Murder is in itself evil, as no one will deny. But if the end for which murder is committed be to prevent greater evils ; murder is then no longer murder, no longer evil. Henry was assassinated because he was an enemy of the church ; so far then from his murderer having committed sin in murdering him, the end for which he did it fully justi- fied him. Such is Jesuitical theology, founded on this abominable principle : " The end justifieth the means !" The " tractatus de preceptis ecclesiae," or, treatise on the commandments of the church, is another part of the moral theology, by which Rome teaches her clergy to domineer over the consciences of the people. These precepts are seven in number, and although far, very far, indeed, from having any portion of the Divine Word to enforce the observance of them, they are yet commanded by those tyrants over gospel liberty to be observed with the same scrupulousness, and under the same penalty, as the commandments of God himself. The number of fasts ; the food to be used in time of lent ; the quantity of same food ; whether to be taken morning or evening ; how those are to act who are in a delicate state of health ; the age at which children are bound to observe lent; whether nurses, who have young children at their breasts, be free from the precept ; each and every one of these minutiae, and many more of equal absurdity, are discussed, and judgment passed on all those who do not observe 10* 10$ SIX YEARS IN THE them with the greatest precision. The due observance ©f saint-days, the confession of sins to a priest, the re- ceiving the eueharist at least, once a year, and the pay- ment of tithes, are all and each commanded umler pain of mortal sin. A minute detail oi' eaeh oi' the foregoing ffreeeptS, and of the degree oi' sinfulness attached to their non-observance, would be quite uninteresting to the reader* Be it sufficient, then, to say, that when con- scienee and the fear of committing mortal sins are not Sufficient to make them be observed by the people, the secular arm is called in to regulate the errors of eon- Bcience. In Koine, no tlesh-meat. is sold in the public markets on Fridays or Saturdays, nor during the whole oi' lent, unless at two or three stalls, which are licensed by the government, on paying a great tine, to sell it to those who have a written permission from their respective parish priests, or from other clerical superiors, to make use of meat at such times ; which permission the latter never give,' unless when well paid for it. At the public restaurants and hotels, unless at those frequented by English travellers, it is not permitted to cook tlesh-meat on fast-days ; and should the parish priest have any cause to suspect that tlesh-meat. is eaten on such days in the private houses of any oi' his parishioners, he is at liberty to break into the privacies oi' domestic circles, and bring the Offenders to justice, or rather iujusticc. Many cases oi" public punishment for transgressing this precept, oi' fast- ing are on record ; but one in particular, which was re- lated to me by an eye-witness, is so glaringly unjust ami cruel, that I cannot refrain from relating it. * A VOUOff man travelling on foot from Aquapendente to Rome, retired during the heat of the day, it being summer, to an osfcria, or obscure inn, on the road to repose, and take some refreshment. Having brought from home, for the sake oi' economy, some bread and meat ; he opened his wallet and began his repast, the host supplying him with a bottle of wine. He had not half finished his repast, when two carabincri, or policemen, came into the same tavern, and seeing him doing what was not lawful to be done on a fast-day — eating meat — they immediately took MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 103 nim prisoner, and conveyed him to Rome between them. He was brought before the court the next day and con* demned to pay a penalty of fifty sctidi, or dollars ; or if unable to pay the fine, to suffer one hundred lashes on the spot where he had eaten the meat, and be kept two months with a chain to his leg at the public works, and confined by night in the castle of St. Angelo. The latter sentence was executed to a tittle, while mine host was fined fifty scudi also, for allowing meat to be eaten in his house on a day prohibited by the church." Had the same young man been found guilty of maiming one of his fellow creatures, or of robbing him of his property, his punishment would not be severer, if indeed so severe, as the one inflicted for daring to transgress the precepts of the church — though the former transgression be against the laws of God ; the latter against the laws of man only. Those who neglect to go to confession, and receive the sacrament at least once a year, are also punished by the secular arm. Their names are affixed to the gate of the church, and they are forbidden to enter it till they are reconciled to the priest. If they continue obstinate, they are then formally and solemnly excommunicated. The ceremony of excommunication is performed in the fol- lowing manner. The parish priest, attended by a deacon, sub-deacon, and acolythist, comes forward, dressed in white, and advancing to the lowest step of the altar, reads the following: Ego hujus parochiae praesul, juxta potes- tatem mihi concessam ab episcopo diocesano, et ex auc- toritate summi pontificis, his presentibus communione fidelium privo, et ab eadem separo N in hac paro- chia domiciliantem propter ; et omnes fideles cujuscumque gradus, status, sexus vel conditionis ab ejusdem consortio, colloquio, ! blood is seen issuing from the wafer, and in such quantity as to change the colour of the corporal, milk-white before, into a deep red. The assembled multitude then humbly prostrated themselves and adored the holy particle, which thus condescended to confirm by a miracle the truth of the doctrine of the real presence, and to strengthen by the same the minds of those who may be tempted to doubt of its truth. The priest, whom the temptation of the evil one had led to doubt of his own power, fainted at the foot of the altar, and was borne in a state of in- sensibility to the sacristy. On recovering, he humbly confessed his doubts, and lived ever after so holily, that he was deemed worthy after death to be enrolled among * A town in the pope's dominions, and situated in that part of them which is called " il patrimonio di San Pietro," or the patrimony of St. Peter, from its having been bestowed to the then reigning pope by Constantine the Great, on his first embracing Christianity. The deeds of conveyance are still preserved in the church of St. John Lateran at Rome ; though many are so incredulous as to doubt their genuineness. I remember to have read, in one of the notes to an edition of " Orlando Furioso," printed in some heretical country — Germany, I believe — in which Orlando is said to have made a jour- ney to the moon, where he discovered, among other things worthy of attention, the very identical deeds by which this part of Italy was made over to the successors of St. Peter ! f A white linen cloth, which is spread upon the altar during the celebration of mass ; so called from being honoured with the sup- posed body of our Saviour. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 109 the number of saints. The corporal is preserved to this clay in a case of gold, as an eternal memorial of the truth of consubstantiation ; an altar having been built in the same church for its particular worship ; which is called " l'altare del corporale miracoloso," or, the altar of the miraculous corporal. Many miracles are daily performed before this altar, and devotees come to worship at it from all parts of Italy. This story is preserved in the archives of the church of Monte Fiascone, and fully authenticated by the signatures of many respectable persons who wit- nessed the miracle. But, I fear, were these respectable persons to arise again from their graves, after a residence there of some ages, there are many heretics who would doubt the truth of it. Are you, reader, one of them ? In another church at Rome, known by the name of " Church of the most holy Sacrament," there is pre- served a particle which changed the water of a deep well into blood. The manner in which this happened is said to be the following : — On a Holy Thursday, the Jews sent one of their number to a Christian church in order that he might get possession of the Christian's God, under pretext of receiving the sacrament. The man, having received the particle in his mouth from the fingers of the priest, immediately withdrew from the church without swallowing it, and carried it to the house of his rabbi. The latter invited the other Jews to assemble next day, Good Friday, and have the pleasure of again torturing the God of the Christians. His followers assembled accordingly, in great numbers, each being armed with a knife, or some other sharp instrument, in order to reduce to atoms the particle. The rabbi him- self gave it the first cut, when immediately blood began to flow from the wafer, to the astonishment of all pre- sent. Fearing that the wicked deed might come to the knowledge of the authorities, they took up the particle and threw it into a deep well, the water -of which was instantaneously turned into blood, and a divine splendour was seen to encompass its mouth. This was observed by some one passing by, who immediately gave the alarm ; and, on search being made, the blessed particle 11 110 SIX YEARS IN THE was found floating on the water, and still bleeding. The rabbi and his accomplices were obliged to confess their crime, and suffered the punishment of death, which they so well merited, having been torn asunder by the popu- lace ; while the wafer was carried in procession to the nearest church, and deposited in the tabernacle. A church was afterward built on the site of the rabbi's house, and the identical wafer is still preserved in it, for the adora- tion of future ages. The foregoing story was probably invented in order to find a pretence for extorting money from the wretched Jews, and to excite against them the popular hatred. It is made also to answer the purpose of confirming the people's belief in the real presence by a miracle. It is well known that the Jews have more liberty and more justice shown them in the capital of Mahometanism than in that of popery — by professors of the religion of the false prophet than by the followers of the meek and lowly Jesus. They are shut up, like so many malefac- tors, between two gates, every night, in a place called " il ghetto," by their Christian taskmasters ; whereas, in Constantinople, they at least have the power of retiring to their homes when they think proper, and have no gates to hinder them from access to their families, and no prisons to fear, if found in the streets after a certain hour. They are not obliged to listen to the preaching of the Turkish mufti, under pain of fine and imprison- ment; whereas at Rome they are forced* to hear a ser- mon once a week delivered by some friar, in order to imbue their minds with that idolatry, though under another name, for which their forefathers were so often punished, and which Jews so generally hold in abhor- rence. What I have said of their treatment in Rome can also be said with equal truth concerning it in the other cities of Italy where they are to be found ; and * If they do not attend the sermon, and answer to their names when called, they are fined and imprisoned. When they do attend, there is a man, with a long pole, who strikes them if he observe their attention withdrawn from the preacher for one moment. No wonder, then, that the Jews hate Christianity, when they have such a sample of it as this before them. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. Ill more especially in the other cities of the pope's tempo- ral dominions, as Ancona, Senegaglia, Bologna, &c. In the cathedral church of Venice, there is also pre- served in a vial the blood of our Saviour.' Some say, that it is a part of the identical blood that flowed from his wounds at Calvary, while others, not so credulous, think it only the blood which flowed from a consecrated wafer, and was collected and preserved for the veneration of the people. I shall relate one story more, fabricated for a proof of the real presence, and then quit the subject, with which, I fear, the reader is already disgusted. Some time after the reformation in Germany, a heretical painter came to Rome to perfect himself in his art, by copying after the celebrated masters, who have adorned by their works " the holy city. 11 * Being imbued with the sacramentarian heresy, he endeavoured, as far as he could without danger, to ridicule the doctrine of the real pre- sence. One day, while riding through the street on a mule, he saw at a distance a procession, carrying the viaticumt or eucharist to a dying person. He endeavour- * Urbs sacra, or holy city, is an epithet applied to Rome by many writers on ecclesiastical history, when they have need to mention that capital. Perhaps they understand " sacra" in the sense Virgil applies " sacra auri fames," that is, " accursed." If so, they only imitate the Tuscan expression of "Roma santa; popoli cornuti," holy Rome, but horned people. -j- Viaticum properly means " provisions for a journey." A dying man, being about to set out on a journey to the other world, is first anointed ; that is, he has his feet and other parts of his body besmear- ed with oil, in which consists the sacrament of extreme unction. He may, or he may not receive the eucharist, prior to this operation, which on this occasion is called " viaticum," as being that which he must live upon during his journey to heaven. Rabelais, the French wit, being asked by a friend some days before his death, if he were prepared to die 1 ? "0 yes!" answered he, "for I have got my wallet stored with the necessary provisions, and my boots greased," — meaning that he had received the viaticum, and extreme unction. He was a Franciscan friar, whom a disgust for monkery hurled into infidelity. It is surprising, what trust is placed by Romanists in ex- treme unction. The first question asked by the friends of a deceased, upon being informed of his death, is, " Has he been anointed I" If the answer be in the affirmative, then follows the exclamation, " Thank God !" Salvation through the merits of a crucified Saviour is never once thought upon ! ! 112 SIX YEARS IN THE ed to turn his mule into another street, lest he should be obliged to dismount and adore it, upon coming nearer. The animal, however, more devout than his rider, refused to be guided by him, and much against his will, bore him in front of the procession, where, as if to show him an example, it knelt down and devoutly adored the holy sacrament ! By such ridiculous stories as these related, is the popular superstition kept alive, and the priest's power upheld. Being unable to establish so absurd a doctrine on any part of the Divine word, and conscious that the belief in it forms the corner-stone of their other preten- sions, they spare neither conscience nor truth in their attempts to give it the appearance of a doctrine pleasing to the Supreme Being. Hence the miracles and other lying wonders invented in attestation of it; hence also the corporals, innumerable portions of blood, incorrupti- ble wafers, and such like mummery, to be found scattered through the churches of Italy, and through other parts of popish Europe. The people, thus wheedled into a belief of transubstantiation, have the most exalted opi- nion of the men who are the agents of it, and accord- ingly give money to have it performed on their behalf, that is, they buy masses, to be celebrated according to their intention, from those traffickers in the blood of Christ. Rich men, especially such as have led a life of debauchery, leave by their will a sum of money for so many masses to be annually celebrated for the repose of their souls. Money often amassed by extortion and in- justice is thus bequeathed, in hope of appeasing the Divine wrath by offering again as a propitiatory sacrifice Him who made atonement once for all for the sins of the whole world on Calvary ; the sacrifice being thus impi- ously reiterated in contradiction of the words of a dying Saviour, " it is finished ;" or, as the Latin Vulgate has them, '" consummatum est." There are in Rome hun- dreds of priests, whose means of subsistence entirely depend upon the emolument derived from masses. They make the tour of the different churches every morning, and wherever they find the most money for their mass MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 113 there they celebrate it. Two Roman Pauls, about twenty-five cents, is generally the price of a common mass ; and four dollars, or more, for a high mass, or " missa cantata," which cannot be celebrated without the presence of four or five priests, who divide the money between them, after the performance, as comedians are accustomed to do with their night's benefit ; the high priest receiving the largest portion, and so on according to their different ranks. The " tractatus de juramentis," or the treatise on oaths, has in it something so subversive of the general good of society, especially of Protestant society, that I cannot re- frain from making a few remarks upon it. After explain- ing the nature of an oath, and the rigour with which it ought to be observed, this treatise goes on to determine the degree, of sin attached to the breaking of it ; what penalty is incurred by the man who takes a false oath in attestation of an untruth, and whether one taken for the good of the church be sinful or otherwise. The latter question is that which I wish to call the attention of the reader to in particular ; as it may teach him the degree of trust and confidence which he can safely place in any oath, contract, or bond entered into with any Roman Catholic, when such oath or contract be in any way con- trary to the good of the Romish church. It has been decreed by the council of Constance, and the same decree has been confirmed by divers popes, and practised upon in most places, if not in all, where Roman Catholics are mixed up with Protestants ; " that no faith be kept with heretics." Every Roman Catholic is at liberty to swear to any lie which he himself pleases, or which he is in- structed to affirm, without falling into sin, provided he acts so for the good of the church. So far from such a violation of the sacredness of an oath being held as cri- minal, he is taught by his priest that it is meritorious and laudable. A Roman Catholic is also dispensed from exe- cuting the terms of an oath, which he may have entered into with a heretic, if the observance of such terms be hurtful to the interest of his church ; and a priest, when summoned before a Protestant court of justice to give 11* 114 SIX YEARS IN THE evidence against a co-religionist, can safely swear, though he is at the same time certain of the man's guilt, that he knows nothing whatever concerning the case in question ; and if the condemnation of the prisoner be attended with any damage to the church, he is commanded to swear positively to the prisoner's innocence. If he act other- wise, he is severely punished — perhaps suspended from his clerical duties. A Roman Catholic is not deemed delinquent when he invents any audacious calumny and confirms it by an oath, if his design be to promote the cause of popery, and to impede and cover with disgrace Protestantism. Thus in Ireland the Roman Catholic pe- riodicals teem every day with invectives against the Pro- testant clergy as a body, and more especially against those individually, who deem it a duty which they owe to God and society to thwart the priests in their system of imposition, and in their settled plan of leading to de- struction and final damnation the souls committed to their charge. On this account they incur the enmity of the priests, who are not sparing of their abuse, and if nothing true (which is generally the case) can be brought forward to injure their opponents in the opinion of the public, recourse is had to false accusations, which are speedily attested by some hopeful members of their flock. This is only acting up to the principle laid down in their mo- rality, "that nothing can be sinful or unjust when the advantage of the church is at stake." But it would be well if priests contented themselves with simply forging false accusations against the conscientious ministers of the gospel. Their zeal for the suppression of heresy often shows itself in acts of violence against the persons of the heretics ; for not unfrequently do they excite their deluded followers to insult and injure them. It is well known how many Protestant clergymen were waylaid and murdered in Ireland of late years, and how many of their houses were burned by nightly parties of priest- ridden bigots. It has been remarked that those ministers who were the most zealous and active in the cause of Christ, were always chosen for the assassin's knife ; while others who were indifferent to the propagation of MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 115 gospel truth, and who lived on good terms with the priest, were always saved from harm under his protecting wing. Is it not then reasonable to suppose, that the murders and outrages committed on the former were not without the priests' knowledge ; or would it be too much to say- that those acts of violence were committed at their insti- gation ? The priests certainly connived at them, for they used every means in their power to screen the offenders from justice. But this is not all. A Roman Catholic can very easily obtain from his priest, for a trifle of money, a dispensation from performing any contract entered into with a Protestant, even in things which do not belong to the church, and from the performance of which the church could not possibly receive any damage. This power is granted to the priest by a canon of his church, wherein it is expressly declared " that every oath or contract, by which a Roman Catholic is bound to a Protestant, can be rendered null and void, if so it seem fit to the pope or priest." If then the Protestant have no better way of making the Roman Catholic adhere to his plighted faith, than the conscience of the latter, he may be almost certain of being deceived. The scruples of con- science are soon removed on paying a half-dollar, or some other sum, according to the means of the applicant, to a priest. According then to these doctrines, it is manifest, that any Protestant placing confidence in the oath of a Roman Catholic, acts, to say the least of it, imprudently. Either the Roman Catholic deceives him or he does not. If he does not, he is a Roman Catholic only in name, for he does not act up to the dictates of his church, and is unwilling to make use of her dispensing power. If he does, it is only the practical effects of the morality I have been giving a description of, and therefore no matter of wonder. Cobbett somewhere tells a story of a Cor- nish knave, who, before taking a false oath, which he was often in the habit of doing, was accustomed, before going to give his evidence, to promise to himself that he would swear falsely that day. Was this Cornish knave a Roman Catholic, or did he act so by advice of the priest ? It looks very like a Jesuitical prank. 116 . SIX TEARS IN THE CHAPTER XVI. Reflections upon monastic studies — Extraordinary charity of those who endeavour to excuse doctrinal error — The young monk begins to see monachism as it really is — Schools in which he learns the secrets of monachism — Want of decorum in reciting the divine office — Gradual corruption of the young monk — Monks bons vivants — The manner in which the income of convents is spent — Belly versus Obedience ; a scene in monkish life — Cardi- nal Micara in jeopardy — The foregoing scene dramatized — Ca- lumny and detraction of monks — Their conversation in the refectory — Monkish luxuries obtained at the sacrifice of honour and virtue — Story of a young man, the victim of monkish calumny — Clerk of the kitchen — Manner of punishing a bad cook — Monkish fasting and abstinence — Lent — Dinners — Collation — Monkish false pretensions. The foregoing remarks on monastic studies will give the reader some idea of the way in which monks are prepared for acting their parts in the soul-destroying drama of popery. Many Protestants imagine, that most of the glaring corruptions, moral and dogmatical, which are to be found in the Romish church, are more the effects of human weakness, than of any organized system esta- blished by the authority of that church. But on examin- ing the works and opinions of popish theologians, and the canons by which these opinions are confirmed, it will be found that no error, however great, no supersti- tion, however derogating from the honour due to God, is left unsealed by the authority of the church itself. Monks therefore, and priests of every description, are taught the manner of propagating those errors, which, if they were not a component part of the doctrine of the church, would not form a portion, and the larger portion too, of the studies which are deemed essential to the candi- dates for the Roman Catholic ministry. People, therefore, who through an excess of charity overlook such glaring errors, or attribute them not to the church itself, but to the liability to err of human nature, should first examine MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETO. 117 if this species of charity be not rather the effect of indif- ference for the vital doctrines of Christianity, than of love and desire of excusing the errors of their fellow men. If one single erroneous practice of the church of Rome can be found unauthorized by the clergy and head of that church, or if not expressly authorized, it can be found unfavoured indirectly, or not countenanced by them, then indeed there may be some room left for charitably hoping, that many of its absurd doctrines are the effects of popular superstition, and not the genuine teaching of the church ; but until such an one be found — and I believe that will be never — it will not be thought uncharitable to condemn the misplaced and extraordinary charity of those who are so desirous of exercising it in favour of error. Six years is the usual time allowed for passing through the course of study which has been described, after which the student is examined, arid if he be approved of, he obtains a license for preaching, and<€or exercis- ing the other offices attached to the priesthood. This license can be granted by no other than the chief-superior of the order, who is called the general ; but when the sub- jects are at a great distance from Rome, and cannot, there- fore, personally appear before him for examination with- out great inconvenience, it is then sent to them on the strength of a certificate, from their local superior, of their ability and fitness. During the years of study, the young monks have also more opportunities of observing the lives and conduct of the other monks, and of becoming more intimately acquainted with monachism than they had while simply novices. They are, during the time they are students, kept less confined, and allowed more intercourse with the older monks. This more intimate knowledge of the monastic state is generally, if not uni- versally, attended with disgust. They were comparatively happy while kept in ignorance of the real state of things ; but now that the whole, undisguised truth is open to them, when they have no opening left for escape, having made a solemn profession ; they find by experience the monastic state quite different in practice from what it 118 . SIX YEARS IN THE appears to the uninitiated, or to those who judge from the theory of the rule. Where they expected to find peace, brotherly love, devotion, and godliness ; they dis- cover little else than contentions, mutual hatred, super- stition, and impiety. Wo be to him though, who is so imprudent as to express his dislike to such a life, after having made his vows. If he wishes to have any future peace, he must dissemble his disgust, and accommodate himself to circumstances. By degrees he will soon learn to live as others do, and by long practice in the art of monkery, he will become equal and perhaps surpass others in the very things for which he at first had so great an aversion. The choir, refectory, conversation room, &c. are the schools in which the secrets and practices of monach- ism are very soon learned. The very little attention paid to the divine office during the time it is reciting in choir is complained of — even by the monks themselves. They are consci(ius that the careless manner in which it is performed, is sufficient to destroy any degree of merit attached to it; and even taking it for granted, that the repetition of psalms in an unknown tongue can be a right way of offering homage to the Supreme Being, the inat- tention with which it is performed must certainly render it rather offensive than pleasing to him. Many monks do not understand the language in which it is recited, while those who do are for the greater part confirmed infidels, and go through it as a part of their daily labour. The words of the prophet Isaiah can be justly then applied to a monkish choir — " These worship me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me." The young monk, on leaving the convent in which he passed his year of probation, where some attention is paid to de- corum at least, in the performance of this duty, feels sur- prised at the inattention it is gone through with,in the other convents. By degrees, however, he accustoms himself to this want of respect and reverence in the worship of God, and very soon joins his brethren in snuff-taking, laughing, smiling, and in the other devices practised by MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC.' 119 them to kill the time during which they are obliged to give their bodily presence to the worship of the Supreme Being. The refectory is another school, in which the young monk learns the real condition of the life he had embraced, and to which he had bound himself by his solemn profes- sion. The table of the convent, in which he passed his novitiate, or year of probation, was frugal and temperate, and rather scanty ; he will then be surprised — agreeably so perhaps — to find the tables of such convents as are not troubled with novices, groaning under the weight of the best that the season can afford. There are no persons so fond of a good dinner as monks, and very few who put in practice so many shameless arts to obtain one. In- deed, all Italians are fond of eating, but monks are so to a proverb ; for " mangiare come un/rate" means to fare as sumptuously and as greedily as a friar — an expression applied to those who are able to maintain a good table. Another proverb also seems to hint that friars are well known for good livers ; indeed, their general appearance shows, that they are in the habit of spending more hours in the refectory than in the choir, for they are mostly fat, corpulent men. The Italian peasantry express their idea of a fat beast of any kind — a hog, e. g. — by comparing it to a friar. " Porco grasso come un frate," " a hog as fat as a friar," is a common expression, and not meant to cast reproach on the profession of a friar, but used as being adequate to convey an idea of extreme obesity. The income of the convents is principally spent in this way. If the superior should endeavour to curtail the usual number of dishes, or apply the money of the con- vent to any other use than in satisfying his subjects' desire of eating and drinking, he may be certain of in- curring their hatred, and of being deposed. Letters of complaint will be written against him to the general supe- rior at Rome, and false accusations will be brought for- ward to hasten his ruin. If he continue obstinate in his purpose of withholding the desired sumptuous entertain- ments, attempts will even be made on his life. Examples of the latter method of avenging the wrongs of the belly 120 SIX YEARS IN THE arc numerous ; but I shall relate only one, which fell under my own observation. In the convent of the Capuchins at Rome, the usual number of courses every day is four for dinner, and two for supper, with a plentiful supply of wine, fruit, confec- tions, &c. ; though on feast-days, and other solemn occa- sions, the above number is increased as far as twelve, and sometimes twenty ! Repairs being wanted to one of the wings of the convent, Cardinal Micara, who was general of the order at the time the things I am going to relate happened, determined upon withholding some of the usual courses, and apply the money thereby saved toward paying the expenses of the requisite repairs. Presuming on his authority as general of the order, and supposing that no one would have the boldness to dispute the will of a cardinal, he thought it needless to consult the other friars, or to ask their consent, on the proposed measure. How much he overvalued his authority and the deference due to him as a cardinal, was proved in the sequel. The friars were astonished the first day that his decision be- gan to be put in practice, to find themselves put off with two dishes for dinner, and only one for supper. Yet they allowed it to pass over in silence, imagining that it was caused by some extraordinary scarcity of provisions in the market. The next day came, and the same number of courses were served up as the day before. This was followed by murmurs and whispers among themselves. They at last came to the determination, and agreed to rise in a body, and demand the reason of this unusual proceeding, should it be repeated on the third day. The third day came, and with it the same dinner as the two former. At a signal before agreed upon, each and every one arose from his seat, and clamorously demanded the reason of being obliged to dine on two courses, contrary to the rules and regulations of the convent. The supe- rior endeavoured to appease the tumult, and began to ex- plain that such was the general's order; but had not pro- ceeded far in his discourse, when he received a blow from a bottle thrown at him by some invisible hand, which stunned him and soon covered him over with blood and MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 121 wine ; the bottle having been broken against his head. The confusion now became general ; bottles, decanters, tumblers, plates, and dishes, flew about in all directions. The superior, after recovering a little from his blow, thought it the best plan to make good his escape, which he at length effected, after receiving a few more wounds from the missiles that were thrown at him. He pro- ceeded to the cardinal's apartment, and related to him what was going on in the refectory. The cardinal has- tened to the scene of action, but his presence was hailed by a volley of jugs, and tumblers, and he also was very glad to run for his life, after receiving three cuts — one of them from a knife — which confined him to his bed for some weeks after. On regaining his own apartment, he despatched one of his servants for the police, who imme- diately surrounded the convent, and through their exer- tions peace was in some degree restored. There was much blood spilt, and not few of the combatants carry marks of the wounds received in this engagement to this day, if they be living, and I have little doubt but they are. The convent was placed under an interdict, till the ringleaders could be discovered. The affair was very soon spread through the whole city, and found its way into the French newspapers. It was afterward made the subject of a tragi-comic opera, and acted with great ap- plause at many of the French theatres. The principal and leading character in the play was Cardinal Micara, dressed in the habit of his order. In the first act, he is represented plotting with other aged monks against the bellies of his subjects, and bargaining with the undertaker for the repairs of the convent. The second act introduces the assembly of monks laying plans for resisting the in- roads made on their daily allowance of delicacies, and binding themselves by a solemn engagement, ratified by a glass of wine, to resist to the last. The third and last act represents the scene of action ; the coming of the cardinal into the refectory, his sermon on obedience, his wounds, his flight, &c. This monkish brawl was fol- lowed by a serious injury to the private interest of the cardinal ; for he was obliged to resign his office of nun- 12 122 SIX YEARS IN THE cio to the court of St. Cloud, to which he was appointed by Leo XII. some time before. He was well aware, that the scandalous scene, in which he bore so conspicuous a part, would not be very easily erased from the minds of the French, and consequently, not to put himself in the way of ridicule, he very prudently resigned his nuncia- ture.* The refectory is also the place where the young monk learns, from the example of others, to murmur against and calumniate his absent acquaintances. No people are so given to backbiting and detraction as monks, and none exercise it so freely as they do, whenever an opportunity presents itself. In the refectory especially, whenever read- ing is dispensed with — and this very frequently happens five days in the week perhaps — their conversation is made up entirely of criticism on the conduct and actions of some unfortunate monk of their acquaintance, who is not pre- sent to defend himself. If an indifferent person were present, or one unacquainted with monachism, and its cus- toms, he would imagine that the person on whom the con- versation turns, is a monster of iniquity, and unfit to bear the name of man. Indeed, it seems, that the chief end for which they were created, was for giving pain to their fellow creatures ; and if it were, they could not pursue a better course than the one daily followed to arrive at that end. A subject for conversation being started by the superior, perhaps, relative to the conduct of Father This, or Brother That, every one hastens to make his own remarks upon it, and draws forth from his retentive memory some past failing or other of the unfortunate monk's. Thus they continue eating and murmuring, drinking and ca- lumniating, till the signal is given for returning thanks. Then all arise, and the superior begins the form of prayer for the occasion with the words, " tu autem, Domine, miserere nobis," " pity us, O Lord ;" as if the Lord * The above description of the drama I had from a French gentle- man, who assured me, that he himself saw it acted on the theatre of Marseilles. I have no reason to doubt the truth of his assertion, though I never saw a copy of it myself, nor ever knew any other person who saw it acted. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 123 could be pleased with men whose only and greatest plea- sure lies in gratifying the brutal passions of eating to excess, drinking in proportion, and tearing asunder the characters of their absent brethren. It is not enough for them to indulge their bodies in feeding upon the meat obtained at the expense of every principle that ennobles human nature, but they must also indulge their spleen and rancour— the most hateful passions of the mind — in taking away the good name of some of their fellow victims — for they are all victims to the detestable, unchristian system of monkery. Nor let it be thought too bold an assertion to say, that their meat or living is obtained at the " expense of every principle that ennobles human nature ;" for what can be more debasing to the human mind, than to yield an implicit, blind obedience to one who, it feels conscious, very often commands things quite at variance with its own innate sense of right ? Is not the whole life of a monk one uninterrupted scene of lies and imposition ? Is he not daily acting the part of an impostor and hypocrite, when, at the command of an atheistical superior, he teaches doctrines in which he does not believe himself? And to what else do all these labours and pains in the service of Satan, and in bringing the souls of his fellow men under the grasp of that enemy — to what else, I say, do they tend than to obtain wherewithal to satisfy the factitious and artificial wants of inordinate desires ? To supply the refectory with more than is often thought necessary for the tables of princes ! If this be not obtaining bread at the sacrifice of virtue and truth, I do not know what is ! Human na- ture is therefore debased, and he cannot be a good monk, who does not sacrifice every generous feeling, every prin- ciple, by which man is rendered superior to the brute, at the monstrous shrine of monkery. I have already, in another part of this book, given some examples of the evil effects following persecution ; I shall now relate one illustrative of another branch of persecu- tion — calumny or backbiting, to wit ; which is near akin to persecution, with this sole difference, that the latter is conducted openly, and in the face of all, whereas the 124 SIX YEARS IN THE former is carried on privately, and the subject of it very seldom becomes aware of his danger till he finds himself on the brink of ruin. A young monk, whose name I do not now recollect, though I was slightly acquainted with him, being sent by . the general to preach at a village in -the Campagna di Roma, took up his residence at the house of a respectable inhabitant of that village, where there was a young woman, a daughter of the master of the house. It happened that he fell dangerously ill before the end of the lent,* and being unable to remove to his convent, he was obliged to remain at the forementioned house till after his recovery. During his illness he was treated with the greatest atten- tion by every member of the family, and by no one more so than by the young woman who was the mistress of it ; her mother being dead. On being reinstated in health, he was diffuse in his thanks to the gentleman and his daughter for their kind treatment ; and as a more substan- tial proof of his gratitude, he presented the latter with a valuable gold ring, which he bought designedly for that purpose. But that ring was the beginning of his misfor- tunes. The young woman, not even thinking, at this time, of any thing improper, made no secret of the ring, and showed it to a great many of her acquaintances, and among others, she showed it to another monk of the same order with him from whom she got it. He being a private enemy of the other, and only waiting for an opportunity of bringing something forward that might injure him, soon told it to a second with some additions ; the second then told it to a third, and it went from one to another in this way, until it became at length the table talk of the entire province. It at last reached the general's ears only a few days before the young monk himself was publicly up- braided by one of the other monks with whom he had some falling out, with having debauched the young * Lent is the only season of the year in which there are sermons every day in the churches of Italy. At other times, except a panegyric on a saint, or sermon in praise of the Madonna, the entire devotion of the people is spent on the dramatic mummery of the mass, or some other unscriptural ceremony. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 125 woman, and of having given her a ring in token of his love. This accusation, of which he knew himself inno- cent, struck him speechless, and his silence was construed by the others into a tacit confession of his guilt. He was sent for, to make his appearance at Rome before the general, and answer the accusation. He appeared, and denied having had intercourse with the young woman, requesting at the same time to know the authors of the calumny. The general repljed, that the ring which he had given her was a sufficient proof of his guilt, and that the young woman herself confessed to her father, that she was with child, and that she had been violated by him. The young $nan knew not what to do, and being unable to bring forward any thing in proof of his innocence, he was suspended from the priesthood, and sent a prisoner to the dungeon of the inquisition at Corneto, there to live confined the remainder of his life. His innocence, how- ever, afterward appeared, for the young woman, brought to the grave in giving birth to a child, being seized with remorse, confessed publicly before her death, that she had falsely accused the young monk, and that she had been betrayed by another young man, who paid his addresses to her, and afterward deserted her. She also confessed that she laid the crime of seduction to the charge of the monk, being excited to do so by her confessor, who told her that she would be received into a nunnery after the birth of her child, if she could prove that she had been violated by an ecclesiastic. The most extraordinary cir- cumstance in this story is, that the confessor who gave the young woman this perfidious advice, turned out to be the young monk's secret enemy, and the most active pro- pagator, and indeed the first inventor, of this most scandal- ous falsehood. So much for the conscience of confessors, who hold the office of judges between God and man ! The young monk was afterward released from prison, and obtained leave from the pope to leave the order altogether. What became of him after his secularization, I never could learn, as he quitted the Roman state and retired to Lombardy, his native province. This young man's character was torn asunder a mil- 12* 126 SIX YEARS IN THE lion of times in every refectory of the province, before the false accusation reached his own ears ; and I remem- ber to have seen joy sparkling in the eyes, and breaking forth from the countenances of his fiend-like calumnia- tors, while discussing this, to them, pleasing subject. Many other crimes were also laid to his charge, which never existed but in the treacherous minds of his ac- cusers and calumniators. They knew very well, that if the first accusation could be made good, all other ac- cusations, however improbable they might be, would be easily credited. They, therefore, in order to satisfy their malicious dispositions, and to give food to their hellish appetite for the misery of others, scruplednnot to lay to the charge of one that never offended or injured them, crimes of the most enormous dye — and all this for the fiendish satisfaction of triumphing over a fallen brother, whom they should rather have endeavoured to reform than to calumniate — if they were possessed of the small- est particle of that to which they so audaciously lay claim — gospel perfection. Another subject of discussion in the refectory is the quality of the food, and the manner in which it is prepared. Many monks are excellent cooks, and though they do not perform the laborious part of cookery, yet they give their directions and superintend the business of the kitchen with great attention — much greater perhaps than they bestow upon the works of the ministry. There is always appointed in each convent a superintendent of the cooking department, or clerk of the kitchen, whose duty it is to give directions to the lay-brothers, who are the working cooks, of the manner in which such and such dishes should be prepared, and according as he may perform this office to the satisfaction of the other monks, his future promotion to the higher dignities of the order depends. If dinner be badly prepared, a general mur- mur ensues, and the poor cook is immediately called upon to render an account of his want of attention. If he can give no satisfactory reason for the soup's being too salt, or badly tasted, or the meat's being over-boiled, or half-raw, he is liable to be instantly punished by the MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 127 superior. Sometimes the clamour against him is so great, especially if he should fail in his cooking two or three times successively, that the monks inflict punish- ment on him with their own hands, and thus, in a sum- mary way, take vengeance for the trespasses, which his carelessness or want of skill committed against their palates. This, however, seldom occurs, as they usually leave it to the superior to decree what punishment is due to so great an offender. The punishment more fre- quently inflicted on him is the discipline, and bread and water for dinner, which he must eat on his knees. The discipline is a sort of punishment which cannot but appear strange to the generality of people in this country ; it may not then be thought foreign to the subject to give a short description of it, especially as it is only among monks that bad cooking is punished with the lash. * The monk, having received his sentence while on his knees in front of the seat occupied by the superior, kisses the ground in token of humility and obedience. He then retires to the farthest corner of the refectory, and kneeling down, draws his habit over his head, by which his bare back is exposed, and with a cord prepared for that purpose, begins the act of flagellation, singing in the mean time the " Miserere ;" which being finished, he draws down the habit again, and having put it in order, proceeds to the head of the table, where the superior is seated, and asks pardon, first from him, and then of the other monks, for the fault he had committed. He then returns to his own place, and taking the bread and water from the table, he places them before him, and having first asked leave from the superior, commences his dinner. The other monks all this time continue in their seats, and enjoy the satisfaction of seeing him punished, with feelings rendered still more hostile by having their dinner spoiled through the culprit's carelessness. This punishment is seldom inflicted for any other fault than that of bad cooking. Indeed, this is considered one of the greatest crimes of which a monk can be guilty, and is, therefore, punished with unusual severity. If, however, the cook should still continue to send to the 128 SIX YEARS IN THE table badly cooked or unsavoury dishes, he is then dis- missed altogether from that office, as being one incapable of performing it, and transferred to some other of less responsibility ; or if he is not professed, he is dismissed from the order altogether, as one likely to be of no ad- vantage to it. The lent, or lents, for some orders have more than one, are passed in the same round of feasting as any other part of the year. The only difference is, that fish takes the place of flesh. If the .expense be looked to, a dinner of the former is far more expensive than one of the latter. The same number of dishes is served up, consisting of different kinds of fish, or if different kinds cannot be obtained either for love or money, then the same kind, but prepared in different ways, is used. Boil- ed, fried, roasted, and stewed fish is often served up at the same meal The soup — an indispensable article ip. an Italian dinner — is in lent composed of rice boiled in almond-milk, which is so very dear, as only to be used as a delicacy at the table of the rich ; yet monks, who by their vows are sworn to observe a life of poverty and abstinence, think it no sin to vie with the rich in delica- cies of this kind. Supper in lent, or collation as it is called on account of its being something less than an ordinary supper, i. e. a monk's supper, consists of only one plate of fish and some salad. Monks make a great noise in the world about their fasting and abstinence, and about the severity with which lent is observed within the walls of their convent ; but a peep within the scene will soon convince any unprejudiced observer, that their fast- ings, &c. like many other of their practices, cannot bear the public eye. They, therefore, put on mortified coun tenances when they go out, and report in every place they visit, that their diet in lent is wholly made up of oil and herbs ; thus adding lying, as they usually do in other things, to hypocrisy in this, also. So far from the ob- servance of lent being considered as a penance, many of them, who prefer fish to flesh-meat, long for its arrival, being sure of satisfying their desire of eating at that time, with more gout than at any other season of the year. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 129 CHAPTER XVII. Effects of bad example — Its effect on the Author's mind — He seeks the advice of his confessor — The confessor's apology for the vices of his order — A word of advice from the same for the Author's pri- vate use — Tampering with the consciences of others, as practised in the confessional — The Author practises upon his confessor's ad- vice — Falls into infidelity — Argues publicly against the existence of God — Becomes an object of suspicion to his fellow monks — Search made in his room for heretical books and papers — Johnson's Dic- tionary convicted of heresy — Ordination — Number of orders in the Romish church — In what the candidate for ordination is examined — Character of Monsignor Maeioti, Suffragan-bishop of Villetri — Episcopus in partibus. In such a school as this the young monk, just freed from the restraint in which he had been held during the year of probation, soon learns to forget whatever good principles he may have imbibed from the precepts and instruction of his master-novice. Those instructions, though tending to form erroneous ideas of things, and to judge falsely of matters bearing a near relation to the good of society, and to his own eternal welfare, were at least clothed in the garb of truth, and had the power of restrain- ing him in some degree from open acts of impiety. But the evil doings of the other monks, their murmurings, their love of defamation, their insatiable desire of indulg- ing in sensual gratifications, especially in those of the table, and their lukewarm, not to call it impious manner, of going through the services, which are intended, how- ever erroneously, for the worship of God ; all these things united, soon make him throw aside, as useless, the principles of a religious life which he had imbibed* and plunge headlong into the vortex of corruption and irre- ligion, in which his fellow monks are so deeply sunk. He may at first, perhaps, take but little part in the petty brawls and quarrels which agitate his brethren, and may be too scrupulous in doing gratuitous injury to those from whom he has received none ; but after some years', nay, 130 SIX YEARS IN THE months' practice and daily example set him by others, he will soon, too soon, take an active part in these scenes, and make himself a ringleader in the practice of those very things which at first appeared to him so sinful, so disgusting, and so unbecoming the character of men who are dedicated to the service of God, and to the preaching of his laws to their fellow men. But as a bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit, so also monkery, essentially bad in itself, cannot possibly be followed by any other effects than what flow from the corrupt fountain of unrestrained human passions, and from the practice of a false system of religion. When first introduced into such scenes as these de- scribed in the last chapter, I really imagined myself re- moved into a different sphere of existence altogether. I could hardly conceive it possible, that men, whose osten- sible object in life is the service of God, and the edifica- tion of God's people, could act in a way diametrically opposite to the fulfilment of that object. Farther expe- rience soon convinced me that God and his service took up the smallest portion of their thoughts, and that self, and the gratification of their passions, were the things which each and every one had most at heart. I soon became convinced that the religious habit was used as a cloak to cover over their detestable vices, and that the preaching of God's word, and the administration of church rites, were used as instruments, through the medium of which they might more easily attain their desired ends. In place of realizing a quiet, holy, undisturbed life, which I so fondly anticipated, I found that such a life would be more practicable in the midst of worldly pursuits than in the society of monks ; and that a religious, serious deport- ment, so far from obtaining for its possessor love and esteem, among them would only procure him hatred and ridicule. What my feelings must have been on thus finding my long cherished hopes of happiness in the monastic life, totally destroyed by becoming practically acquainted with that life itself, and how I must have re- gretted the vow which I had a little before taken, of adher- ing to it for ever, thereby leaving to myself no opening MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 131 for retraction, may be more easily imagined than de- scribed. I, for a long time, wished to persuade myself, so loath was I to be undeceived, that things which ap- peared to me evil and indecorous, may be in themselves harmless, or at least, indifferent, and that the evil of them consisted more in my manner of viewing them than in the things viewed. But this deception of my better judgment could not last for ever, for the more I observed them, the stronger grew the opinion of their being any thing but in accordance with the precepts of revealed, 01 even of natural religion. I began, therefore, to judge more freely of the morals of my brethren, and to feel satisfied that their manner of living must appear unbecom- ing and indecorous to any one, judging it even by the standard of natural morality, not to mind the more rigor- ous standard of Divine revelation. These opinions so long resisted, and considered as temptations of the devil, I now, that I could resist them no longer, thought it advi- sable to lay before my confessor, while seated in his tri- bunal — the confessional, and ask his advice thereon. I had not, at this time, entertained the smallest doubt of the truth and holiness of all and every doctrine of the church of Rome, nor did it once enter my mind, that the cause of the evil lives of the monks should be attributed to the corrupt form of religion which they professed, and of which they were the ministers. Had such thoughts oc- curred, I should have resisted them as temptations from the evil one, indeed. I had then little imagined that a time would come when it would please the Almighty to dispel darkness from my benighted sou], and show me the way in which he loves to be worshipped, and from which way no bad effects can follow. But this happened many years after. Believing, firmly believing, indeed, in the Divine institution of auricular confession, as one of the infallible doctrines of Rome, and convinced that it was the only safe method by which sinners could be re- lieved of their doubts and fears, and that through it remis- sion of sins is really obtained, I approached, with reve- rential awe, the judgment seat of the priest, having already 132 SIX TEARS IN THE resolved to make the sins of others, and not my own, the subject of my confession — to lay before him my thoughts, my opinions, my judgment, and my temptations con- cerning the conduct of the other monks. He heard me very patiently to the end, and then replied, Jirst, that the tribunal of penance was the place for hearing the sinner confess the sins committed by himself, and not for hearing a sinner accusing fellow sinners of sin ; "but," continued he, " as I have heard you so far, and as you have asked my judgment — not opinion, (this was said in character,) on the bad customs and evil practices of our brethren, I must acknowledge that their general conduct is not in accordance with a life of gospel purity, which their sacred character of priests obliges them to attain, and that when examined by the standard of gospel morality, it must appear to every observer in the same sinful light it has appeared to you. But, dear brother, we must con- sider that monks are also men, as well as those living in the world, and that he * who goes about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour,' takes more plea- sure in tempting them than in tempting others ; and that, withdrawing from the world and dedicating themselves to the worship of God do not necessarily include a freedom from those passions to which all men, more or less, are subject." He finished his apology for their vices by a word of advice directed to myself, the sum of which was, " that I should be cautious how I showed any sign of disgust or dislike at the conduct of others ; and that now was the time, while young, of conciliating the favour of my brethren, by overlooking their faults, and charita- bly attributing them to an erroneous judgment, and the weakness of human nature, and not to premeditated in- tention of offending God, and injuring their fellow men. If I acted otherwise, it would be the cause of blighting my future prospects of arriving at any dignity in the order, and would bring down upon me retaliation from the persons whose conduct I took the liberty of criticis- ing, which would very probably cause me no small share of uneasiness and trouble. " MONASTERIES OF ITALJTj ETC. 133 The foregoing is the substance of the advice, as far as I can now recollect, which my confessor thought it his duty to give me. By it may be seen the iniquitous tam- pering with the consciences of others practised in the confessional, and the settled plan of making the fool, who bends his knee to that seat of judgment, be recon- ciled to every practice, every open immorality of the clergy. A minister of Christ, one, too, arrogating to himself the representation of the person of Christ in his ministerial office, making an apology for the vices of his order in the very exercise of that office, is in itself horrible ; but when the same minister, not con- tent to apologize for vice, also encourages the person, whom superstition and a false notion of religion brought to his knees, in order to ask advice for his future con- duct ; when he encourages and exhorts such a person to conform himself to the reigning vices, or at least to give them his sanction by passing them over in silence, under pain of injuring his future prospects of aggrandizement, or of drawing upon himself and incurring the hatred of the evil-doers ; when the minister uses his authority as representative of Christ in advising — which, from a con- fessor, is the same as commanding — such abominable things as these, then indeed it must be manifest, to even the most incredulous, that popish theory, as well as practice, is detestable, and that the confessional, so far from being a place wherein the sinner is advised to ab- stain from sin, is converted into a place to inculcate the precept of sinning. This assertion will perhaps be denied by a great many unacquainted with the evil ten- dency of popish inventions ; but let those who have every day before their eyes the gross immoralities of the Romish hierarchy, and who are aware that such immo- ralities are the effects of theory, speak and deny the truth of it if they can. His apology, however, for the vices of the order did not satisfy me, though I was weak enough to put in practice his advice. I began to conform myself by degrees to the established customs, and, from a disgusted spectator, was in a short time changed into 13 134 SIX YEARS IN THE an animated actor on the theatre of monkery. I soon learned to take pleasure in the misfortune of others, and, for self-preservation, to attack when attacked, calumniate when calumniated, thwart when thwarted, murmur when murmured against ; in fine, I arrived at such perfection in the art of tormenting, and in the art of sinning, that I very soon became the aggressor, without having re- ceived any provocation, and was able to beat the most experienced among them, at their own weapons. From this time I may date my gradual fall into infi- delity. I first became lukewarm in the discharge of my religious duties ; to this succeeded indifference, and from indifference to infidelity it is well known how easy is the transition. The study of philosophy, especially that part of it called metaphysics, performed an extraordinary change in my mind and opinions, and directed my thoughts into a channel in which they were unaccustomed to run. Every doctrine, however absurd, every story, however insulting to reason and wide of probability, was swallowed with avidity before ; but now I took pleasure in examining for myself, and experienced great joy if I could invent some argument by which I might be able to prove false or improbable some leading doctrine of Christianity. I remember to have about this time — the third year of my being a monk — argued and proposed objections against the existence of God, in a public dis- putation held for that purpose, and to have received great applause for causing my opponent — the defender of God's existence, (who, by-the-way, had hardly an ounce of brains) — to stumble, and be unable to maintain his thesis. Though I prefaced my objections with a declaration that whatever would be brought forward by me in the heat of argument, if contrary to the received doctrine of the church, (in which I am a firm believer, I added, hypo- critically enough,) should not be considered as my real opinions, but used on the present occasion for -the sake of exercise in the art of reasoning ; I nevertheless re- ceived, with heartfelt delight, the applause received from those who saw my stupid adversary unable to confute the flimsy and impious sophisms which I urged against his MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 136 thesis — against the existence of God.* I went farther; I even wished to persuade myself that my arguments were invincible and unanswerable, and that they proved the whole world — from the savage to the philosopher — guilty of error on account of giving credit to that which, indeed, requires a far greater degree of credulity not to believe than to believe. Thus, without understanding Christianity, or without knowing more concerning it than what can be picked up at the corrupted fountain of popery, I was induced, partly through the scandalous lives of its ministers — the monks — and partly through giving un- restrained liberty to my fancy — not reason, for of that I had as little as most modern infidels — to deny, first, the doctrines which are the inventions of popery, and which, at that time, I was unable to distinguish from genuine Christianity; and then, Christianity itself — having cou- pled in my own mind Christianity and popery, as if the one could not exist without the other ! About the beginning of the fifth year of my monkish life, very strong suspicions began to be entertained, by my brethren, that I was not a firm believer in the doc- trines of the Roman Catholic church. These suspicions were confirmed by an outward want of attention on my part to the practice and ceremonies of religion as exer- cised in the convent, and by many unguarded expressions which I often allowed to escape me while in conversa- tion with those whom I imagined to be, and who really were, of my own opinion. Though all monks, or at least the greater part of them, are confirmed infidels, they yet have a dislike to those who outwardly show their unbelief; not that they have themselves any love * It is lawful to dispute upon every doctrine of Christianity at the public schools in Rome, that is, the fundamental doctrines of that religion, as the divinity of Christ, the Trinity, the existence of God, &c. &c, because such tenets can bear inquiry, and the more they are examined, the stronger and firmer will they become ; but equal liberty is not granted for disputation upon the peculiar doctrines of the church of Rome. Thus, it is unlawful to call into dispute the su- premacy of the pope, his infallibility, the divine institution of the leading doctrines of the church, &c. &c. ; for these cannot bear in- quiry, and must therefore be believed on the ipse dixit of the pope. 136 SIX YEARS IN THE for Christianity, but rather because they fear that an infi- del and unbeliever who has not prudence enough to dis- guise his real opinions, even in the presence of his associates, will not be very zealous in propagating the tenets of popery, and in consulting for the good of the order — the two things on which their influence over the minds of the people, and the emoluments necessary to their subsistence, depend. One of the monks with whom I had a very close friend- ship, and in whom I placed great confidence, informed the superior privately, that I was disseminating opinions dangerous to the good of the order, and that I had a great many heretical books in my room which he did not un- derstand, but was sure they could not be good, because written in English; and also, that I was continually writing and taking extracts from the same books, which, if brought to light and examined by some one acquainted with the English language, would place beyond all doubt, my having fallen off from a steady belief in the doctrines of the church. This insidious information increased the suspicion which was already but too strong against my orthodoxy. Having, however, got a hint of it, and sus- pecting that a search in my room for books and papers would follow, I thought it prudent to convey my books out of the way, and commit to the flames my papers, which were chiefly taken up with remarks upon mona- chism, satires upon the monks, and extracts from the books 1 had in my possession. I then borrowed from the convent library four or five feet of theology, two or three of councils, as many of morality, and nearly a yard of legendary lore, lives of saints, &c, which I conveyed into my room, and with them supplied the vacuum left by the removal of my own books. The search, as I ex- pected, was made some days after, by the professor and local superior ; but they could not help laughing, when they found nothing but theology, morality, metaphy- sics, legends, lives of saints, &c. &c. The only book which they made any objection to, and which I thought it needless to remove, was a Johnson's Dictionary. This immediately was accused of heresy, and why ? Because MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 137 written in English, and because they could not under- stand it.* Poor Samuel Johnson was accordingly seized upon, and carried for trial before one of the older monks, who had a smattering of English, which he learned from some Englishman who kept a shop in Ancona, his native town. The old monk, putting on his spectacles with the air of an inquisitor, examined it here and there, and cast- ing his eyes by chance on the word " Jesuits," which is denned by Johnson " a body of monks who presume to usurp the name of Jesus" he immediately pronounced it heretical. It was then given over to the superior, and I thought he was going to commit an auto defe on it, i. e. burn it, but this he did not do ; for he only placed it under lock and key in the library among the " libri pro- libiti" or prohibited books.f The storm passed over in * The greatest distrust is held of all English books throughout every part of the Roman states. * I once had a bundle of " Galig- nani's Messenger" in my hand, which an English friend had lent me, and meeting accidentally with the professor, he asked what it was. I told him, it was a bundle of English newspapers. He chided me for reading such heretical writings, observing that " thousands of English heretics go to hell every day" (vanno alia casa del diavola ogni giorno.) So much for monkish bigotry, and the effects of the unchristian doctrine of exclusive salvation. •j- In the library of each convent there is a place set apart for pro- hibited books, or those books which are censured by the master of the " sacred palace" who is always a Dominican friar. The best books of every European language are prohibited, and sentence of excommuni- cation passed against all who read them. The titles and the names of the authors of such books are collected in one volume entitled " in- dex librorum prohibitorum," printed at the Vatican press annually, and given away gratis to the different libraries of popish Europe. This is also another emolument to the papal see, for the librarians and booksellers are commanded neither to lend nor sell prohibited works, unless to those who have a written license from the pope to use them. This license is never granted till paid for, and thus the obtaining of it becomes a source of gain to the " infallible head" of the church. It is really astonishing, what a change money is capable of performing! It may be asked, whether reading such a booh be sinful or otherwise ; if not sinful, why then place a shackle on man's liberty by prohibiting it 1 if sinful, how is it possible, that the bestowing a sum of money on a self-constituted authority, can make it not sinful ? The reason for this, as well as for most other practices of the church of Reme, must be sought in the insatiable desire of amassing money by making 13* 138 SIX TEARS IN THE this way, and indeed, with far less trouble than I at first thought it possible, judging from the bigotry of the monks and from the great pleasure they are accustomed to feel when an opportunity presents of enjoying the misery of others. It had even a favourable effect, for, in some de- gree, it dissipated the cloud of suspicion that hung over me, and made me more cautious in future of reposing confidence in the seeming friendship of those, who only sought an opportunity to betray. About this period, I arrived at the age required by the canons for receiving the order of sub-deaconship ; having already received the four minor orders.* I was accord- ingly sent by the general to Velletri, a city about twenty- six miles from Rome, for the purpose of having that order conferred upon me by* the bishop of that diocess. The candidate for ordination is very strictly examined in presence of the bishop on some treatise of dogmatical theology, selected for the occasion by the examiners. the consciences of Christians a saleable commodity. To this custom of prohibiting books, Pope alludes in the following verses : Lo ! Rome herself, proud mistress now no more Of arts, hut thund'ring against heathen lore ; Her grey-haired synods damning hooks unread, And Bacon trembling for his brazen head. Padua, with sighs, beholds her Livy burn, And even the antipodes Virgilius mourn. Dunciad. • It may not be generally known, that in the Roman Catholir church there are seven orders, four of which are called minor orders ; Osteriatus, Lectoratus, Exorcistatus, and Acolytatus. These four are conferred at a very early age, sometimes before the candidates arrive at the age of understanding the meaning of them. They are now in practical disuse, being considered as only preparatory to the re- ceiving of holy orders ; though in the ancient church, there is reason to suppose the offices attached to them were exercised by some pious laymen of the church. According to Romish theologians, they were instituted by Christ himself, and as proof of their being so, they dis- tort some passages of Scripture. The other three, subdeaconship, deaconship, and priesthood, are called holy orders. The age at which they may be received is fixed by the Council of Trent ; the first at twenty-one years, the second at twenty-two, and the third at twenty- five ; though the pope has the power of dispensing with eighteen months of the latter, which he generally does, if paid for it. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 139 This takes place not so much for the sake of trying whether he is possessed of sufficient information, (the ignorant being as often promoted to orders as the learned,) as in order to be able to judge of the soundness of his views relative to the doctrines of the Roman Catholic church. The treatise on which I was examined, seemed as if designedly selected for my person, for it was that very one about the truth of which I entertained the greatest doubts — " the tractatus de ecclesia" or treatise concerning the authority and power of the church. The doctrines discussed in this treatise being once established on a sure foundation, all the other unscriptural doctrines of popery cannot be denied, without falling into a contradiction ; for if it be once granted that the church has the power of directing and fixing the things necessary to be believed by the faithful, and of bringing in and mixing up tradition with the written Word, and also of explaining that Word itself, in favour of some new doctrine ; how, then, with any consistency can any one of its tenets be denied ? If it be granted with the Italian church, that the pope, in his own person, is infallible, or with the Gallican church, that a council assembled by authority of the pope cannot err ; how then can it be denied afterward, that the things held out for belief, and established by a council or a pope, though in direct contradiction to the words and sense of Divine revelation, are not sound doctrines, and not neces- sary to be believed by all who adhere to the church of Christ? If the authority of popes and councils be once granted to have its claims founded on scriptural grounds, then indeed the belief in purgatory, invocation of saints, auricular confession, and in all the. other innovations made in the Christian faith by popery, must follow, if due consistency be attended to. Though fully aware of the consequences flowing from the questions proposed to me by the examiners on this subject, I yet had the weakness to dissemble my real opinions, and answer with the most scrupulous orthodoxy — that is, as orthodoxy is understood by the Romish church. To this was I. obliged through fear of being refused ordination, if I answered otherwise — a certain result, followed also by personal danger — and also 140 SIX TEARS IN THE through fear of affording an opportunity to mv Mother monks of renewing their former obloquy. I was, tnere- fore, approved of and pronounced by the examiners a fit subject for promotion to sub-deaconship, my papers be- ing first examined, especially the certificate of my baptism, in order to be sure of my having reached the canonical age. Not to revert to this subject again, it may be as well to mention here, that one year after this, on reaching my twenty-second year, I was ordained deacon by the same bishop, after having passed through another examination, similar to the one related above. The treatise selected on this last occasion was that which every Italian priest is obliged to almost swear to — the treatise on the infalli- bility of the head of the church, as the pope is called. This is not pronounced exactly a matter of faith ; for then provocation would be given to the Gallican church to separate from the Italian, as the former does not be- lieve in it ; but it is declared a holy and wholesome doc- trine, and next to faith — proxima fidei. I answered on this occasion, as on the other, according to the known opinion and teaching of the church of Rome, and was so hypocritical as to show a holy anger against the boldness of the French, who dared call in question a doctrine so holy and scriptural. The bishop praised me for my zeal, and hoped that when sent and established in my own country, I would faithfully preach and propagate the doctrines of the Roman Catholic church, and endeavour to bring under the obedience of the supreme pontiff — (sotto Vubbedienza del summo pontejice, were his words) —■the benighted heretics of Ireland, for whose conversion he uttered a fervent prayer — more fervently, I presume, than they themselves pray for that conversion. Poor heretics ! My answer to this holy admonition may be easily imagined, and I passed for a pious, orthodox young clergyman, and for one who would be very zealous in propagating the doctrines of the holy Roman Catholic church. So pleased was the bishop with my answers, and so well did I act my part, that he invited me to dine with him the next day — and gave me a letter of introdue- MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 141 tion to Cardinal Rivarola — who was a particular friend of his ; which I was to deliver on my return to Rome. It is but just to add, that Monsignor Macioti — for that was the name of the bishop of whom I am speaking— was a really good and pious man ; and seemed sincere in his belief of the doctrines of the church of Rome, and firmly convinced that a belief in those doctrines was most essen- tial to the salvation of man. He was bishop in partibus infidelium,* and only suffragan-bishop of Velletri. The diocesan bishop, who was a cardinal, always residing in Rome, left him as his suffragan in care of the diocess ; and on him, therefore, devolved the whole management of the affairs relating to the church of Velletri and its dependencies. He had very little of that pride and vain glory, which are to be found the principal ingredients in forming the character of most popish prelates. He was an humble, practical Christian, and if we except his bigotry, which was more the fault of the religion he pro- fessed than of the man himself, he could have been held up as a shining example for the imitation of the ministers of Christ. Had he lived in another country, or had he been so fortunate as to see the errors of popery, he would certainly be considered as one blessed with an abundant share of heavenly grace. Unlike most Italian prelates, he spent his income on the poor of his flock, and not in * Episcopus in partibus infidelium, or bishop in infidel countries, is a title given by the pope to the numerous bishops without diocesses who surround his throne. Whenever the pope wishes to exalt and do honour to a favourite ; or when a priest of a rich and noble family- is fool enough to throw away a large sum of money for a dignity, he is consecrated bishop of some place, taken at hazard from the map of the world, over which the pope, as universal pastor, claims authority. Thus, one is made bishop of some of the South Sea Islands, while another obtains a diocess in Crim Tartary. They never see their dio- cesses, nor do they ever trouble their heads about them ; some of them often not knowing in what part of the world the place from which they take their title is situated ! They bargained for the empty title, and that they have got — ilfumo senza Varrosto — the smoke without the roast — as the Italian proverb has it. The pope thus bestowing bishopricks on his courtiers strongly resembles the valorous knight Don Quixote bestowing the government of islands on his squire Sancho Panza. 142 SIX YEARS IN THE indulging in the pleasures of the table, and other luxuries. While other bishops might be found at the conversazioni and entertainments of the great, or gallanting, in the character of cicesbei, the wives of their acquaintances, his post was at the bedside of some dying beggar ; endeavour- ing to alleviate his sufferings, and administering the con- solations which religion, however corrupt it may be, always affords to the last moments of a departing sinner. CHAPTER XVIII. Jealousies and enmities of monks of different orders — Reasons for entertaining such hostile feelings against each other — Sample of monkish lampoons — The immaculate conception of the blessed Virgin — The Dominicans and Franciscans declare war against each other — Monkish imposture — Tragic story of Jetzer — The ghost of a Dominican appears to him — Jetzer undergoes the discipline, in order to redeem his brother's soul from purgatory — The virgin prior — Revelations made by the Virgin to Jetzer — He receives the five wounds that pierced Jesus on the cross — Jetzer discovers the imposture — The Dominicans attempt to poison him — He flies from them, and seeks the protection of the civil authorities — The actors in the infernal plot burned alive — Jetzer's death — The use which the Franciscans make of the foregoing narrative — Number of re- ligious orders — How distinguished from each other — Division of monks — Number of the clergy in the capital of popery — Number of beggars. Though great the enmities and jealousies entertained for each other by monks living in the same convent and of the same order, far greater still are those they bear toward other monks of orders differing from their own. The greatest enemies of the same order, who would be glad to see each other at the bottom of the sea, forget their private quarrels, and unite their strength in attacking the common enemy — another religious order. To this they are excited both by the prejudices of their monkish education, which leads them to consider their own order as the one most pleasing to God, and also, by a fear of losing their emoluments, and the means of supporting MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 143 luxury, if another order should rank higher in the opinion of the world than their own. Monks of different orders can hardly observe the rules of common politeness, and keep themselves within the bounds of civility when they meet. They eye each other with looks of mortal defiance, and let no opportunity slip of heaping calumny on each other, and of turning into ridicule the manners and cus- toms of each other's order. If the Franciscan should have an image or relic in his convent, which is thought an object of greater veneration by the people than some other relic or image of the Dominican's, the latter never loses an opportunity of crying down the worth of the former's property and extolling his own. It is a common saying, " two of a trade can never agree." This proverb is verified by those traders in imposition. The Augus- tinian hates the Carmelite, the Carmelite the Augustinian ; the Augustinian the Dominican and the Franciscan ; one branch of the Franciscans hates another branch of the same ; the Reformed hating the Capuchin, and the Capu- chin the Observant ; and in this way they live, hating each other, and trying to debase each other's order, while they extol their own, and all for the sake of bringing money into their own coffers, and of making the people imagine that there can be no degree of merit attached to any order, but to that of which they themselves are members. When this opinion once prevails, and gains ground in the minds of the people, then indeed those who were so fortunate as to establish and propagate it, may triumph over the other orders, and may be sure of obtaining that support which follows from the blind devotion of a superstitious peasantry. Many monks are so zealous in contending for the good of their own order, that they make no scruple to compose satires, and even obscene hymns, against the other orders, and distribute copies of them privately among the people ; for they imagine that the more the other orders are lessened in the esteem of the populace, the more will their own grow in that esteem. I have seen a "prayer" composed in Latin by a Domini- can friar, in order to turn into ridicule, and bring oppro- brium on the Capuchins, who had a convent in the same 144 SIX TEARS IN THE town, (Albano,) and who ranked higher in the opinion of the public than his own order. It was handed about by the Dominicans, and at last reached the hands of a secular priest, who had a friendship for the Capuchins, and by him it was shown to their superior, who complained against the author to the court of Rome. As far as I can now recollect, for I have not by me a copy of it, it ran thus : — " Deus, qui malignos Capucinos in hoc mundo scaturire fecisti ad destructionem mulierum, olei, vini, panis, caeterorumque tuorum comestibilium, extende super eos, te quesumus, manum tuae potentiae, da illis morbum Gallicum, et deduc eos in profundum lacum, ubi remaneant per omnia saecula saeculorum. Amen." (O G — d, who hast made the malignant Capuchins spring up in this world, for the destruction of women, bread, oil, wine, and of thy other eatables ; extend over them, we beseech thee, the hand of thy power, give them the * * * disease, and sink them into the deep lake, where may they remain for ever and ever. . Amen.) I have deemed it necessary to give this blasphemous prayer — highly blasphemous indeed — in order that the reader may be able to form a judgment of the wicked devices which monks have re- course to, when the desire of aggrandizing their own order, and of bringing it into repute, impels them to ridi- cule, and thereby debase, (though often at the expense of truth, and of doing injury to their fellow creatures,) the orders of other monks. It also may show the little venera- tion in which God is held by them, when they dare take in vain his name, and apply it in so unseemly a manner. It is true, that the Capuchins, and indeed all monks, give sufficient provocation to wish them badly ; and to en- deavour, for the sake of society, to expose their evil doings ; but yet this need not be done in the blasphemous manner which we see here practised ; and practised too by those who are as deep in iniquity as the very persons whom they censure. The well-known dispute between the Dominicans and >-! Franciscans relating to the immaculate conception of the Virgin Mary, was carried on by these two orders for many years with an equal degree of vehemence on both MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 145 sides. The question, uninteresting as it may appear, and as it really is, whether the Virgin Mary was born without the blemish of original sin, or not, employed the pens and talents of the greatest men of these orders for many years, and bid fair to disturb the peace, not only of the members of each order, but also of the whole Roman Catholic church. No arguments were left un- tried, no schemes were left unpractised, by the contend- ing parties, to prove one another guilty of heresy, and thereby to bring on the conquered side the opprobrium attached to the name of heretics. It is not to be sup- posed that they cared a fig whether the Virgin was, or was not, immaculately born ; but the question was start- ed, a different side was taken by each, and the honour of their respective orders, and the maintenance of its respect with the people, required that each party should defend, with all its might, the side of the question it had adopted. The tragic story of Jetzer, conducted at Bern, in 1509, for determining this uninteresting dispute, is well known to the world. I shall, however, take the liberty of relating it here, in order to give the reader, who may not have heard it before, a view of the impious frauds which have been carried on in the church of Rome, and of the little regard which monks pay to the means so that they obtain their end. The Franciscans maintained that the Virgin Mary was born without the blemish of original sin ; the Dominicans asserted the contrary. The doctrine of the Franciscans, in an age of darkness and superstition, could not but be popular, and hence the Dominicans lost ground from day to day. To support the credit of their order, they re- solved, at a chapter held at Vimpson, in the year 1504, to have recourse to fictitious visions and dreams, in which the people at that time had an easy faith, and they de- termined to make Bern the scene of their operations. A lay-monk named Jetzer, who was extremely simple, and much inclined to austerities, and w.ho belonged to their order, was chosen as the instrument of the delusions they were contriving. One of the four Dominicans, who had undertaken the management of this plot, conveyed him- 14 146 SIX YEARS IN THE self secretly into Jetzer's cell, and about midnight ap- peared to him in a horrid figure, surrounded with howl- ing dogs, and seemed to blow fire from his nostrils, by the means of a box of combustibles which he held near his mouth. In this frightful form he approached Jetzer's bed, told him that he was the ghost of a Domi- nican who had been killed at Paris, as a judgment of Heaven, for laying aside his monastic habit ; that he was condemned to purgatory for this crime ; adding, at the same time, that by his means he might be rescued from his misery, which was beyond expression. This story, accompanied by horrible cries and howlings, frightened poor Jetzer out of the little wits he had, and engaged him to promise to do what was in his power to deliver the Dominican from his torments. Upon this, the im- postor told him, that nothing but the most extraordinary mortifications, such as the discipline of the vjhip, per- formed during eight days by the whole monastery, and Jetzer's lying prostrate, in the form of one crucified, in the chapel during mass, could contribute to his de- liverance. He added, that the performance of these mortifications would draw down upon Jetzer the pecu- liar protection of the blessed Virgin, and concluded by saying that he would appear to him again, accompanied by two other spirits. Morning no sooner came than Jetzer gave an account of this apparition to the rest of the convent, who all unanimously advised him to undergo the discipline that was enjoined him, and every one consented to bear his share of the task im- posed — that of flogging the poor wretch. The deluded simpleton obeyed ; and was admired as a saint by the multitudes that crowded about the convent ; while the four friars that conducted the imposture magnified, in a most pompous manner, the miracle of this apparition, in their sermons and in their discourses. The night after, the apparition was renewed with the addition of two impostors, dressed like devils ; and Jetzer's faith was augmented by hearing from the spectre all the secrets of his life and thoughts, which the impostors had learned from his confessor. In this and some subsequent scenes, MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 147 equal in enormity to those already related, the impostor talked much to Jetzer of the Dominican order, which he said was peculiarly dear to the blessed Virgin ; he added, that the. Virgin knew herself to be conceived in original sin ; that the doctors who taught the contrary were in pur- gatory ; that the blessed Virgin abhorred the Franciscans for making her equal with her son ; and that the town of Bern would be destroyed for harbouring such plagues within her walls. In one of these apparitions, Jetzer imagined that the voice of the spectre resembled that of the prior of the convent, and he was not mistaken ; but not suspecting a fraud, he gave little attention to this. The prior appeared in various forms, sometimes in that of St. Barbara ; at others in that of St. Bernard : at length he assumed that of the Virgin Mary, and, for that purpose, clothed himself in the habits that were employed to adorn the statue of the Virgin on the great festivals. The little images that on those days are set on the altars were made use of for angels, which, being tied to a cord that passed through a pully over Jetzer's head, rose up and down, and danced around the pretended Virgin, to in- crease the delusion. The Virgin, thus equipped, ad- dressed a long discourse to Jetzer, in which, among other things, she told him that she was conceived in original sin, though she had remained but a short time under that blemish. She gave him, as a miraculous proof of her presence, a host, or consecrated wafer, which turned from white to red in a moment ; and after various visits, in which the greatest enormities were transacted, the Virgin prior told Jetzer that she would give him the most affect- ing and undoubted marks of her son's love, by imprint- ing on him the Jive wounds that pierced Jesus on the cross, as she had done before to St. Lucia and St. Catha- rine. Accordingly, she took his hand by force, and struck a large nail through it, which threw the poor dupe into the greatest torment. The next night, this mascu- line virgin brought, as she pretended, some of the linen in which Christ had been buried, to soften the wound ; and gave Jetzer a soporific draught, which had in it the blood of an unbaptized child, some grains of incense and 148 SIX YEARS IN THE of consecrated salt, some quicksilver, the hair of the eyebrows of a child — all which, with some stupifying and poisonous ingredients, were mingled together by the prior with magic ceremonies, and a solemn dedication of himself to the devil in hope of his succour. The draught threw the poor wretch into a sort of lethargy, during which the monks imprinted on his body the other four wounds of Christ in a manner that he felt no pain. When he awakened, he found, to his unspeakable joy, those impressions on his body, and came at last to fancy himself a representative of Christ in the various parts of his passion. He was, in this state, exposed to the admiring multitude on the principal altar of the convent, to the great mortification of the Franciscans. The Dominicans gave him some other draughts that threw him into convulsions. By means of a pipe placed in the mouths of two images, one of Mary and another of the child Jesus, the former of which had tears painted upon its cheeks in a lively manner, they contrived to make the two images speak. The little Jesus asked its mother, by means of this voice, (which was that of the prior,) why she wept ? and she answered, that her tears were owing to the impious manner in which the Franciscans attri- buted to her the honour that was due to him, in saying that she was conceived and born without sin. The apparitions, false prodigies, and abominable stra- tagems of these Dominicans were repeated every night ; and the matter was at length so grossly overacted, that, simple as Jetzer was, he at last discovered it, and had almost killed the prior, who appeared to him one night in the form of the Virgin with a crown on her head. The Dominicans, fearing, by this discovery, to lose the fruits of their imposture, thought the best method would be to own the whole matter to Jetzer, and to engage him, by the most seducing promises of opulence and glory, to carry on the cheat. Jetzer was persuaded, or at least appeared to be so. But the Dominicans, suspecting that he was not entirely gained over, resolved to poison him ; but his constitution was so vigorous, that though they gave him poison five several times, he was not destroyed MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 149 by it. One (Jay they sent him a loaf prepared with some spices, which growing green in a day or two, he threw a piece of it to some dogs that were in the monastery, and it killed them immediately. At another time, they poi- soned the host, or consecrated wafer ; but as he vomited it up soon after he had swallowed it, he escaped once more. In short, there were no means of securing him which the most detestable impiety and barbarity could invent, which they did not put in practice ; till finding, at last, an opportunity of getting out of the convent, he threw himself into the hands of the magistrates, to whom he made a full discovery of this infernal plot. The affair being brought to Rome, commissaries were sent from thence to examine the matter ; and the whole cheat being fully proved, the four friars were solemnly degraded from their priesthood, and were burnt alive on the last day of May, 1509. Jetzer died some time after, at Constance, having poisoned himself, as was believed by some. Had his life been taken away before he had an opportunity of making the discovery already mentioned, this execrable and horrid plot, which, in many of its circumstances, was conducted with art, would have been handed down to posterity as a stupendous miracle. It is now related by the Franciscans to their novices and students, in order to excite their hatred against the Dominicans, and to be used as an argument in favour of the immaculate concep- tion, which they so zealously defend. They say, " that such a well-laid plot could never be discovered, were it not for the intervention of the Virgin, whose prerogative it attempted to impugn, and thereby lessen the praise and adoration due to her from the faithful ; that she permitted it to proceed so far prosperously, in order to take a signal and public vengeance on the machinators, and that through her protection Jetzer was preserved from the powerful poisonous draughts, which were so often admi- nistered to him by his impious brethren."* * It ought to be understood, that I have followed, with very few variations, the narrative given by Buck, in his " Theological Diction- ary," of the above event. It so exactly accords with the account given by the Franciscans, and with what I have read in other books, 14* 150 SIX YEARS IN THE ! The great number of religious orders that infest socie- ty, and the immense number of individuals attached to each order, surpass almost all belief. These orders are distinguished from each other by the colour and form of their respective habits. Some monks wear a white habit; others, a black one ; this order is clad in a brown livery, while that other, in a gray or parti-coloured one. Some have shoes and stockings, while others place merit in going about in sandals, and without stockings. I am not aware that any order as yet has placed merit in wearing boots ; but the time may come when the pope will put his seal of holiness on boots also ! Some orders allow their beards to grow, and shave their heads in imi- tation of the ancient Magi, whom they much resemble in their impositions ; while others, on the contrary, shave their beards, and let the hair of their head grow. Monks are also divided into three different classes. The first class is that of solitaries, who live alone, and are to be found only among the Calogeri, or Greek monks, especially those inhabiting Mount Athos, in Thessaly, called in modern Greek, " opo$ ayios" or the happy moun- tain. The Latin church says, that the Trappists, Bene- dictines, Camaldolensains, &c, are of the class of soli- taries ; but if they are, they must be so, as " lucus a non lucendo," for they are to be found in the most populous cities of Europe, and very frequently in the coffee-houses, and other public places, disputing upon politics, or play- ing cards. This does not look very much like the life of a solitary ! The second class is called that of cceno~ bites, or those living in community, as Franciscans, Capuchins, Dominicans, Carmelites, &c. These are the bulwarks of the Romish church, and on them the pope chiefly depends for upholding his assumed authority. The third class is that of scarabites, who have no fixed residence, but, after the manner of Mahometan Santoni, whom they much resemble, wander through the world, leading a gypsical life, and depending upon their success that I deemed it needless to niake many" variations, which, indeed, if made, would consist more in the manner of relating it than in the fact itself. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 151 in imposing on the people, for support. To this class St. Francis belonged, as has been already related, before he acquired tact enough to impose effectually on the peo- ple, and afterward on the pope himself, by which he succeeded in establishing the order which goes under his name. At Rome especially, are to be found monks of all classes and descriptions, and in such numbers, that the stranger will be struck with astonishment, and wonder where, or how, so great an army of idle, sanctified, dronish vaga- bonds can. find support. An English gentleman, residing in that city, wishing to make a probable guess at the number of clergy with which it is pestered, placed him- self in a window looking out upon the Corso— the prin- cipal street — and counted the surprising number of one hundred passing by, and strolling about for their diversion, in the space of fifteen minutes. If to these be added the nuns, who would also be strolling about in the street at that time, if they had their own will, that is, if they were not inhumanly buried alive, and shut up within four walls, we may form a tolerably just idea of the whole number. Would it be too much to say that they amount in all to six thousand ? I think not, and even hazard to say that they rather exceed than fall short of that num- ber ! Six thousand drones depending for support on a population of one hundred and thirty thousand, for the fixed inhabitants of Rome do not, absolutely, exceed that number ! In winter, certainly, the population is greater ; but then, the increase is occasioned by the foreigners, who arrive from other parts of Europe, and who scarcely ever remain longer than three months. If to the six thousand monks, nuns, and secular priests, we add five thousand more for beggars, we will then find, that in the capital of popery there are eleven thousand useless inha- bitants ! Eleven thousand mouths stopped by the sweat of the industrious part of the community ! eleven thou- sand persons whose only office is imposition, robbing, and begging, and who fully come up to Horace's description of useless creatures, "nati consumere fruges," "born to waste the fruits of the earth" — to eat every thing up, 152 SIX TEARS IN THE CHAPTER XIX. Hope of salvation placed in being buried in a Franciscan habit- Story of a soul saved from eternal damnation through the merits of Saint Francis — Emoluments derived by the monks from the popular superstitions — Story of an heir who was struck dead for defrauding the Franciscans of their due — Ways practised by monks for promoting their own interests — Their tampering with the females of those families over which they have acquired influ- ence — Story in illustration of the foregoing — Allurements held out to females to enter nunneries — Monkish treachery illustrated —A young gentleman's own account of the snares laid by monks for himself, and his sisters — One of his sisters dies of a broken heart on discovering her mistake — Happy termination of the young man's misfortunes. No small degree of merit is also attached by the be- nighted followers of popery to dying and being buried in a religious habit. This proceeds from the sermons of the monks, and from their gossiping among the pea- santry and others. Instead of directing sinners to salva- tion through Christ, and exhorting them to have a firm reliance upon the vicarious atonement made by Him ; their favourite theme is, " the interest which their sanc- tified founder has in heaven, and the respect paid by the d — 1 to a body dressed up in the habit of the order found- ed by him — (St. Francis) — though, perhaps, the former might justly claim the honour of having suggested it. This respect for their habit is the source of great emolu- ment to them, as many who led a life of debauchery and wickedness, and many too who led a comparatively vir- tuous life, leave by their will a sum of money to that body of monks, on whose masses and prayers they rest their hopes of salvation. The Franciscan habit is held in greater esteem, and consequently is thought to have more power of defending the soul from the claws of his infernal majesty, than any other. It is, therefore; sought after with great eagerness, and that man is thought sure of salvation, who is so fortunate as to leave this world MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 153 covered up in its sacred folds. Many stories are invented by the monks, many fables are brought forward as exam- ples, by which to prove how acceptable and pleasing to the Supreme Being is this soul-destroying superstition. From an immense number, one if possible more absurd than the other, I will select a few for the satisfaction of the reader. An Italian count, who, while in health, was the most wicked and depraved of all his associates, being at the point of death, entreated his confessor, a Franciscan monk, to have his body wrapped up after his decease in the blessed habit of St. Francis, and in that dress to be committed to the grave. The confessor, after administer- ing the consolations of religion, and after explaining to him the great benefit which would accrue to his soul from the protection of St. Francis, always partial to those clad in his holy habit, promised to use his influence with the prior of his convent, to obtain the power of complying with his request. This power was speedily granted ; chiefly, it may be suspected, because the dying man had left money for the celebration of masses — as auxiliaries in saving his soul — for indeed monks are not so exces- sively charitable to the souls of others, as to be at any loss, even that of a filthy, worn old habit, (for the longer it is worn by some holy monk, the greater efficacy is attached to it,) without being paid for their trouble and loss in some way. Having obtained from his superior the desired permission, he returned to the sick man, and filled his soul with joy and gladness, while relating the favourable result of his mission. The poor sinner, placing all his trust and hopes of salvation on the holy habit, peaceably expired soon after. Some days after his decease, he appeared to his confessor, while engaged in prayer at midnight in the church, and re- vealed to him, that " he was on the point of being condemned to the flames of hell for all eternity, and that the demon-executioners were in the act of seizing upon his miserable soul, in order to drag it to the place of punishment, when the blessed patriarch St. Francis made his appearance, and observing what was 154 SIX YEARS IN THE going on, prostrated himself at the throne of justice, and begged, that through his merits, and intercession, the soul, whose body was clad in his holy habit, and who had, while united to it, befriended his beloved disciples in the other world, may not suffer for all eternity. The Supreme Judge, looking with compassion on the tears of his faithful servant, and unable to resist his en- treaties, commuted the sentence to a million of years in purgatory ; with the clause of being sooner liberated, if a sufficient number of masses be celebrated for the repose of his soul. The holy St. Francis, having thus suc- ceeded in his business of mediator, immediately drove away the d — Is, now become enraged on account of losing their prey, and conducted the half-redeemed soul to purgatory, where he took leave of it, after having first obtained permission from the angel-keeper, to allow it to ascend once more into the world above, and relate the whole affair to his confessor, and request of him to speak to his son and heir, and urge him to give apart of his for- tune to be laid out on more masses for the repose of his father's soul." Having made this relation, the holy soul redeemed from everlasting torments by the habit of St. Francis, disappeared and returned to its place .of tempo- rary punishment. Will it be thought possible, that such a story as this, such a barefaced, impious falsehood — could be intro- duced into a sermon by any Christian minister? To those unacquainted with the extent of monkish impos- tures, it will indeed, appear, if not impossible, at least improbable ; yet I have both read it in some legend of saints, and heard it afterward related in the Capuchin church of Frascati, in presence of an assembled multi- tude. The life of St. Francis formed the subject of the sermon, and the foregoing story was brought forward in proof of that saint's power in the court of the Almighty. It is evidently invented for the purpose of increasing and strengthening the popular belief in the sanctity of the Franciscan habit ; and of showing forth the great help for obtaining salvation and appeasing the Divine wrath which that habit affords to those, who depart this life MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 155 clad in its sacred folds. The apparition being made to declare the good effects to the souls in purgatory, pro- ceeding from offering masses in their behalf, and his own expectations from the piety of his son, is but a Jesuitical way of picking the pockets of the hearers, and of exciting them to spend more money on the celebration of masses, for the repose of the souls of their departed friends. It may also be a plan (if, indeed, the story has any foundation whatever in truth) for extorting more money from the count's son, by thus laying open to him the miserable state of his father, and the means of short- ening the time of his punishment in purgatory. There is another story related by the monks, vieing with the former in absurdity, though probably invented for the purpose of deterring the heirs of those that be- queath legacies to the order, from withholding what the testator thought proper to bestow. A nobleman of the republic of Genoa, long before it fell under the tyrannical power of his Sardinian majesty, was most devoutly attached to the Franciscan order, and bestowed upon it many substantial marks of his favour during life. At his death he bequeathed a large sum of money, to be used in paying for masses to be celebrated for the repose of his soul, by the monks of his favourite order. His son, a dissolute young man, refused to com- ply with the last wishes of his defunct father, and converted to other uses the money designed for the celebration of the masses. After some time, the father appeared to his un- worthy son, enveloped in flames of fire, and, with an angry countenance, threatened him with instant death, unless he immediately delivered up to the monks the money which he had bequeathed for their use, telling him, at the same time, that " he was tormented by the most excruciating pains of hell, on account of his avarice and disobedience ; for if he, his heir, had complied in fulfilling his last will, and if he had given up to the possession of those for whom it was intended that part of his fortune he had willed to them, the suffrages and prayers of the monks would be of the greatest avail in redeeming his soul from the tormenting state in which it was now placed." He 156 SIX YEARS IN THE further added, " that the habit of St. Francis, in which he was buried, was of no avail whatever, because his son had not given to the holy fraternity to which it belonged, what was lawfully their due ; and that St. Francis, far from looking upon him with a favourable and protecting eye, only regarded him with anger, and had his body stripped of the holy habit immediately after it was consigned to the tomb." The spectre-father then disappeared, and left his son in tl^e deepest consternation, and fully resolved to make amends for his evil and unjust conduct. But this resolution was but momentary, and again he engaged in evil courses with his wicked companions, to whom he related the occurrence, and who laughed him out of his fright, while squandering the property to which he be- came heir. One night, after returning from a carousal, in which he spent the greater part of the day with his vicious companions, he retired to his chamber in a state of intoxication. The following morning, on his servant's entering his room to assist him, as he was wont to do, in dressing, he found him stretched at full length on the floor, a lifeless corpse. It was supposed that his father appeared to him again, and angry at his continuing to withhold the money from the Franciscans, and thereby depriving him of the benefit of their prayers and masses - — the only means of relieving him from torment — he had struck him dead, in order to make him serve as a future example to undutiful heirs, and of the sure punishment awaiting such, even in this world. This supposition was confirmed afterward, when, on opening the father's grave for the purpose of depositing at his side the body of the son, the former's corpse was found stark-naked. This being seen by one of the son's . companions, who attended the funeral, it immediately brought to his recol- lection the story related to him by the son, some time before his death, and more especially that part of it con- nected with the father's declaring* that " his body was despoiled of the habit in which he was buried, by order of St. Francis." He confessed the whole affair publicly, and in presence of all those attending the funeral, and, becoming convinced of the dangerous state in which he MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 157 was placed by his evil course of life, he retired from the world altogether, and dedicated himself to God under the banner of St. Francis. The young man dying without issue, the property was applied for the redemption of the souls of its former owners from the torments which they were, most probably, suffering ; the part bequeathed by the father's will being first given up to the Franciscans, according to the primary intention of the testator, and the rest divided among the other regular and secular clergy of the city, as a compensation for their prayers and masses. Nor did the miracle stop here. The Lord wished pub- licly to show to his faithful people how much he was pleased with the forementioned distribution of the pro- perty. A holy hermit was directed to go the Bishop of Genoa, and signify that it was the Lord's wish that the graves of the father and son should be again opened. The bishop obeyed the Lord's message, and, accompanied by the clergy and laity of the city in procession, pro- ceeded to open the graves. The body of the father was found incorrupt, covered with a sweet-scented liquor, and again clad in the habit of St. Francis, by the same invi- sible agency it had been before stripped of it ; while that of the son was found putrid, and fast dwindling into dis- solution. The former's body was removed and depo- sited under the altar of the Franciscan church at Genoa, where it is kept to this day as a lasting memorial of the power of St. Francis, and of the good effects following from being buried in his habit, and from the prayers and suffrages of his holy disciples, (especially when they are paid for them, some heretic will add !) and of the terrible punishment awaiting those that dare defraud them of any part of that which the Almighty inspired the minds of departing sinners to bequeath them. The above story is its own comment. I shall not add a single word to thejbare narrative, but leave the reader to make his own reflections upon it ; only remarking, that it is by such means that monasteries acquire their riches. If, however, a church that gives countenance to such absurdities be infallible, thank God, there are few infallible churches in the world. 15 158 SIX YEARS IN THE Besides the fables and stories invented for the purpose of increasing the popular veneration for those things to which they attribute miraculous power, and which fables they are not ashamed to relate publicly in their pulpit, thus converting the temple of God into a place for pro- moting their own worldly views, they have also other ways by which they arrive at the same end — ways, indeed, more slow than the former, but yet more sure. The old monks, especially, are appointed to the exercise of them, as being supposed to have arrived at perfection, by long practice, in the arts of monkery. These ways chiefly consist in wheedling themselves into the bosom of families, and having acquired a degree of footing in them, and become master of their secrets, either through the organ of confession, or by the incautious relations of the heads of the families themselves, and not unfrequently by that of tattling servants, they take their own measures, and convert every circumstance to further the end never lost sight of — the advantage of themselves and of their order. The females belonging to such families are more especially those upon whose weak and uneducated minds —nearly all Italian women are miserably uneducated — they make the greatest impression. To these they re- late the wonders and miracles performed by their order, and by its founder; the power granted from Heaven to all those clad in their habit ; the very great benefits, tem- poral as well as spiritual, accruing to believers from the prayers and suffrages of the monks ; and the exceedingly great happiness of having St. Francis and his beatified followers interceding for departed souls at the throne of the Almighty. If these females be mothers of families, they will endeavour to instil into the minds of their child- ren the same notions of monkish sanctity with which their own minds are imbued, and thus the monks find the rising generation as willing to be duped, and to be subservient to their impositions, as their fathers and mothers were before them. If the family with which a monk has succeeded to ingratiate himself be in opulent circumstances — and monks seldom bait their hooks for MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 159 any others — then the merit to be obtained by giving money for the celebration of masses, or for buying clothes for the decoration of the image of the Madonna, or for singing an office for the repose of the soul of some de- parted relative or friend ; the merit to be obtained by things of this description is laid open by him in a most forcible light, and seldom fails of bringing money into the coffers of the convent. If the wife should have any cause, either real or imaginary, to complain of her hus- band, or the husband of his wife, to whom else could either of them reveal, with more propriety, the domestic brawl than to the man of God, — as the favoured monk is styled ? And does the man of God endeavour to restore peace and mutual confidence again to this divided family? If it answer his ends, that is, if it be for the good of himself and of his order, he endeavours to do so ; for if both husband and wife be equally blind and attached to the order, he finds it more his interest to have them re- conciled than at variance. But if, on the contrary, one should be inimical to the order, and the other friendly to it, he is very sure, and it is part of his tact, to endeavour to widen the breach ; for he can gain more by their dis- sension than by their harmony. The wife is the one on whom he more especially depends for the success of his designs, as the husband, in most cases, barely tolerates his visits, and would wish to see both him and his con- vent (which, perhaps, at the coffee-house, among his companions, he calls it by its right name, — a den for knaves) at the bottom of the sea. The monk is not so stupid as not to perceive the dislike in which the husband holds him and his order, and, if it be ever in his power, he does not forget it toward him. He, how- ever, has the wife still to work upon ; and she, on her part, finds him a ready listener while she relates the faults and failings of her husband. Instances are not wanting of whole families turned topsy-turvy through the meddling of monks in their private concerns ; for, instead of being blessed peace-makers, the effects follow- ing their mediations prove them to be accursed sowers of dissensions. Wives at variance with their husbands 160 SIX TEARS IN THE have been frequently found to have made away with the substance and properties of the same, and to have bestow- ed them upon their advisers, the monks ; and all this, by the encouragement and exhortation of the monks them- selves. In illustration of the evil effects which usually attend the meddling of friars in family concerns, and of the wicked use which they make of the influence gained over the minds of the female members of such families, I shall mention a circumstance related to me by a gentleman whom I met at Corfu. There lived in the town of Macerata situated in the march of Ancona, and about fifty miles from the city of Ancona itself, a newly married couple, of the name of Riezzi, well to do in the world ; Riezzi himself being a public notary of some estimation in the town. His wife was foolishly attached to a convent of Franciscan monks, who had chosen that city as a place for carrying on their impostures, and who realized considerable incomes from the superstition of the people. Her more particular favourite was her confessor, the superior of the foremen- tioned convent, and with him she spent more time than in the company of her husband. The latter, on the other hand, could barely tolerate the visits and intrusions of the monks into his house, and privately told his wife, that he would be better pleased if she made less freedom with them. This was the cause of a contention between them, which afterward broke out into an open rupture. The wife complained to her confessor that she was badly treated by her husband, chiefly on account of her endea- vouring to work out her salvation by adhering to the advice and practising the directions laid down by him, in his capacity of minister of Christ. She then enume- rated many of the bad qualities of her husband, and among others, did not forget to mention the command received from him of breaking off her acquaintance with himself, and with those of his order. The hatred which the hus- band had for those of his convent, and consequently for himself, had not escaped the observation of the perfidious confessor, and he therefore lent a willing ear to this con- MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 161 firmatidn of what he had already observed. By his ad- vice, his penitent, the wife, continued in her usual routine of confessions, communions, fasting, &c, and in giving whatever she could pilfer privately from her husband to the community of which he himself was head. The friars nqw abstained from their accustomed visits to his house, but to be revenged for his casting them off, they took every opportunity which presented of speaking badly of him in their visits to other houses, and of representing him as a man of no religion, and as one infected with the principles of freemasonry, which at that time, as well as now, were fast spreading through the Roman states. The poor man, by reason of such insinuations and such reports, found himself by degrees losing his extensive practice, and looked upon with suspicion by his fellow townsmen ; besides being under the close surveillance of the police. He suspected that his wife had a hand in raising this storm, through the agency of the monks to whom she had complained against him. Jle accused her of it, and she, far from denying having had part in it, even gloried in her own shame, and plainly told him, that the duty she owed to God was of greater importance than that she owed to her husband, and therefore her duty to God had prompted her to resist his attempts at withdrawing from her the advice and directions of God's ministers. On this, words rose high between them, and from words the husband proceeded to violence, and gave her a blow which stretched her lifeless on the floor. Fearing he had killed her, he thought it best to consult for his own safety by a hasty flight, and thus make his escape from the hands of justice. He immediately fled from his house, taking with him whatever at that moment he could lay hands upon ; but knowing how difficult it would be to elude the searches of those who would be sent in pursuit of him, he deemed it expedient to unite himself with the insurgent army, who were about that time to march from Bologna toward Rome, in order to take pos- session of the latter city, and free their country from papal bondage. At Civita Castellano he distinguished himself by his 15* 162 SIX YEARS IN THE bravery and perseverance in attacking that fortress, which impeded the further progress of the brave and talented insurgents.* The expedition entirely failing, and being forced to retire on the approach of the Austrians, who were sent for by the pope to help him to tyrannize over his unfortunate subjects, he with many others fled toward the sea-coast, and seizing upon a fishing smack that was drawn up on the beach, put to sea and steered for Corfu, which island they reached after a passage of ten days, during which they suffered great privations, not having had time to provide themselves with sufficient provisions ; and they would certainly have died of starvation, had they not fortunately fallen in with a Maltese vessel, which took them aboard and landed them safely in their place of destination. At Corfu, I became acquainted with Signor Riezzi, and from his own mouth I learned the circum- stance which I have now related. He further informed me, that his wife recovered soon after his departure, and following the advice of the monks, laid information against him before the prefect of the police, who immediately despatched his myrmidons in pursuit. His property was afterward confiscated, and she turned into the streets, without the means of subsistence — a punishment she well merited for her perfidious and unbecoming conduct. If a monk obtain footing in a rich family, where there are young women, daughters, his first care will be to en- deavour to weaken their affections for their parents and kindred ; and to fix them upon something, by which he and his order might be benefited. He opens his attack * The insurrection, which in the year 1831 broke out in the Roman states, was planned and perfected wholly in Bologna. The chief leaders of it were medical and legal students in that city. In- deed, all who were tired and wearied out with monks, priests, and friars ; all, who had sense enough to see into the impositions practised in order to uphold the papal power ; even many of the secular and regular clergy, who esteemed the common good of greater importance than their own individual interest, were all and every one of them united in the common cause, and bound themselves by a sacred oath to use all the means in their power to free their country even at the hazard of their own lives and fortunes. They richly deserve then the «pithet of " brave and talented insurgents." MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 163 upon the daughters of his host by a long detail of the happiness to be found in the monastic state, and the very high privileges enjoyed by those who are so fortunate as to become the spouses of Jesus Christ — the blasphemous title which they give to nuns.* This is his favourite topic, especially when some of the young women are present, though he does not direct his discourse imme- diately to them ; for the better to succeed in his purpose, which is manifestly that of enticing them into a convent, he appears not even to be conscious of their presence. He therefore addresses wholly his discourse to the mo- ther, or to some other tartuffish old woman who may be present. He knows well enough that his discourse will not be thrown away, for either it will have the desired effect immediately on the minds of those for whom it is intended ; or will be repeated, after his departure, by the mother, or aunt, or by some other woman who was list- ening to it, and thus at length will be deeply fixed on the minds of the young women. If he be the confessor of young women of this description, he will then have a favourable opportunity of working upon their minds, and of entrapping them into a compliance with his wishes. While seated in the confessional, with his victims on their knees before him, he can very easily, under the form of advice and instruction, lay open to them the difficulty of saving their souls in the married state ; the dangers and temptations of the world ; the troubles and hardships which they will have to endure for their husbands and children ; in fine, he can represent every thing in * It is a remarkable coincidence, that to nearly all the Hindoo temples are attache^ numbers of females who are openly prostituted to the base desires of the priests, and of those who frequent the tem- ples. These women, like the nuns of the Romish church, are said to be " the spouses of the god." Query — Are not both employed for the same purpose — the gratification of the desires of their infamous priests ] The more popery is examined, the more striking will her relationship to all the false religions, ancient and modern, appear. Her peculiarities and practices are evidently the same with those of paganism, and the doctrines of both lead to the same end, and have the same object in view — the destruction of souls, and the private advantage of their ministers. 164 SIX YEARS IN THE the worst light, which the young women, if left to their own unprejudiced judgment, would consider as the neces- sary attendants on the lot of human nature. On the other hand, he paints in most enticing colours the peace and calm to be found in the state of a nun ; the facilities held forth by that state for holding a closer communion with God ; the protection and intercession of the deceased holy nuns, who walked before them in the same road to salvation ; the harmony and sisterly love which reign among the holy virgins dedicated to God, and the honour of becoming a spouse of Jesus Christ; all and every one of these will be painted by him in the most glowing colours, and insensibly make an impression on the minds of his unsuspecting victims, till at last they consent to become self-murderers, and to bury themselves alive in the convent of some sisterhood, of which their confessor or the monks of his order have the government. After the fatal step, they soon become aware of the deception prac- tised upon them by their wily confessor, and clearly see, in a short time, that their fortunes, and not their persons, were longed for by the nuns of the convent, into which they were so unfortunate as to enter. Their life will become miserable, and they will spend it in cursing their unhappy fate, and in cursing the perfidy of the villain — for so they will call him — who, taking advantage of their inexperience and simplicity, led them by his advice and counsels, in order to advance his own private interests, to sacrifice themselves at the shrine of a monstrous and unnatural superstition. Every thing will be found quite contrary to what they were led to expect, and from what it was represented to them ; they will find neither peace, happiness, nor religion ; and instead of experiencing the sweet calm and contentment of those, who have placed their affections on the things which this world cannot bestow, they will experience the torment of desires, which they are obliged to repress, or at least conceal, of disappointment, and of despair. Let it not be supposed, that this picture of a nun's life is too highly coloured ; nd,that the description I have given of it surpasses, in ny way, the truth. Let those that imagine so, only MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 165 examine for themselves, and without trusting to the opi- nion of others, let them take a view of human nature, as it exists under their own actual observation ; and if they continue in opposing the truth of the above picture, then indeed their eyes must have lost their natural force, and become incapable of performing what they were designed for — to help the judgment in forming just notions of things. It is not to be supposed that monks go to this trouble of inveigling young women into nunneries, thereby bring- ing down upon themselves the curses of those upon whom they succeed, without having some other object in view, besides the gratuitous pleasure of rendering others mise- rable. Although they derive no little pleasure, even from this fiendish indulgence, they yet have a more substantial object also in view — even that of obtaining a part of the young woman's fortune, which she takes with her to the nunnery, and gives up to the disposal of her future sisters. The monks, like recruiting sergeants, who get so much a head for the men whom they bring to join the military service, have also their head-money for every young lady of fortune that they entrap into a nunnery. They are also the governors of the nunneries, and all money mat- ters and affairs relating to its interests are transacted by them. The richer then the nunnery is, the more oppor- tunities will they have of pilfering it, and of converting the surplus revenues to their own private use, or to that of the convent to which they belong. The desire of enriching themselves seems to be the main-spring of their treachery; and all the delusive arts which they practise for the purpose of working upon the minds of the simple and confiding, seem directed to the accom- plishment of that great end. A young gentleman, whose sister was inveigled into a convent by the persuasions and manoeuvres of a monk, her confessor, and who was obliged to flee from Italy himself, on account of joining the Bolognese insurgents, related to me at Corfu, his place of refuge, and mine also indeed, the following story. It will illustrate and give an example of the manner in which monks act, in order 166 SIX YEARS IN THE to draw young women of property under their control. I shall relate it in his own words. " My father was a goldsmith in Senegaglia, and ac- quired a handsome independence by his industry and success in trade. I had two sisters, one older and the other younger than myself. My older sister was mar- ried, while yet very young, to one of her own equals, my father being able to give her a considerable dowry. She also, before her marriage, was besieged by the arts and stratagems of the monks, who endeavoured to per- suade her to become a nun ; but being naturally of a strong mind, she was able to see into their designs, and to evade the snares that were laid for her happiness. I should have told you that my father was very intimate with monks of the Dominican order, who had a convent in our town. These were frequent visiters at his house and table, and seemed to have acquired a considerable influence over him. His table, his money, his interest, every thing he had, was at their service, while they, on their part, wished to repay his kindness by marking out his three children for their victims. The marriage of my elder sister did not in the least discourage them in their attempts, though her fortune was considered a seri- ous loss ; for they congratulated themselves on the fair field they had for enticing her into a convent, and thereby gaining possession of it. They now exerted themselves with renewed vigour in working on the minds of the re- maining two, myself and my younger sister. As for me, they were almost sure — I showed such a docile, flexible disposition — that I could be easily prevailed upon to em- brace their order, and enrich the convent with the pro- perty which my father, at his death, would bequeath me. Nor did they give up their hopes of my coming to that determination, when I was removed to Bologna, by my father's orders, to prepare myself for the medical profession. They followed me there by letters, and gave notice to their fellow Dominicans in Bologna, that I was game worth chasing, and that they should endeavour to ingratiate themselves into my favour; as the property MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC 167 which I was heir to would be of great advantage to the whole Dominican order. "I was hardly well set down at Bologna, when I found my acquaintance eagerly sought after by the monks. I was pressed to accept of invitations to dinners, festivals, and other things of this kind, almost every day by them ; and when I did accept them, I was treated with the great- est respect, placed at the head of the table, and flattered in the most fulsome manner. They never ceased speak- ing before me of the happiness to be enjoyed in the monastic life, and how far superior that life is to a secular, and how much better to enjoy the sweet calm and tran- quillity of a monastery, than be tossed about and harass- ed by the turmoils of the world. They certainly were making strong impressions on my mind, and would have succeeded in bringing me over to their wishes, had not a conversation, which I accidentally overheard between the prior and another friar, opened my eyes to their designs. Visiting the convent one evening when I was not expect- ed, I heard my own name frequently repeated by two who seemed deeply engaged in conversation. Curiosity prompted me to listen more attentively, when I discover- ed that their conversation was about myself, and that the final attack in persuading me should be made in a few days. I could also discover, from their conversation, that my sister had consented to become a Dominican nun, and that my father had already given his consent. I re- tired from the convent without being seen by any one, and immediately wrote a letter to my father, acquainting him with what I had overheard, and entreating him to retract the consent he had given of having my unfortu- nate sister buried alive. I afterward learned, that my sister, after my departure being left alone, and having no one to direct her, gave herself up wholly to the guidance of the monks, and they at last succeeded in prevailing upon her to enter a nunnery. She remained firm in her intention, and having received her portion from my father, she settled it on the convent, and took the veil. After her solemn profession, she became more fully ac- quainted with monachism, which soon brought on grief 168 SIX TEARS IN THE and disappointment. These soon preyed on her spirits, and produced a slow decline, of which she soon after died, cursing with her latest breath the perfidy of the villains who had worked on her weak mind, in order to get possession of her fortune, by enticing her into a con- vent. I became after this so disgusted, so enraged against the monks, that I refused having any more connexion with them, and even refused them admittance to my lodgings, when they came for the purpose of visiting me, They, on the other hand, finding that they had lost their influence over me, wrote many letters to my father, wherein they were not ashamed to give utterance to many falsehoods relating to my conduct at the University ; and by which they hoped to prejudice him against me. My father himself, after a short time becoming conscious of the scheme which was laid for entrapping his fortune and his children, took no notice of their calumnies, and even advised me not to have any thing to do with them, and not to pay any attention either to their advice or themselves. I believe he repented of being so easily duped in my sister's case, and forbade his former friends, the Dominicans, his house, after my sister's death. I myself joined the insurgents at Bologna, and now, through the miscarriage of our glorious expedition, am, like yourself, (meaning me,) indebted to a foreign land for protection. My father is still living, and remits me money when he can do it, without running the risk of being discovered. I myself am outlawed, but my father assures me that he will come and settle in Corfu as soon as he can dispose of his property.'* Here my friend finished his narrative. I have given it, to the best of my recollection, in his own words, and I consider it a striking example of the perfidy and chi- canery of monks in their attempts to enrich themselves at the expense of the happiness of others, whether males or females. The reader will be pleased to learn, that the father of the above soon after arrived in Corfu, having disposed of hi3 property in Senegaglia, and lives there now contented in the society of his son. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 169 CHAPTER XX. Adoration and prayers to saints — Confirmed by the Council of Trent — Absurdity of that doctrine — Image-worship — Papists really and truly idolaters — How they excuse themselves — Adoration of the statue of Saint Januarius at Naples — Blasphemous prayer ad- dressed to Jesus Christ by the Neapolitans — Idol-worship practised by all false religions — Modern Greeks and Romans inexcusable — History of the rise and progress of image-worship in the church of Christ — Image-worship abhorred by the primitive church — Opinions of some of the early fathers on that subject — Images of saints admitted as ornaments in the churches in the beginning of the fifth century — Gregory the Great condemns image-worship — ■ The monks of the eighth century establish image-worship by their own example — Edict of Leo, the Isaurian, concerning images — The priests and monks excite the people to rebellion in conse- quence of it — Leo orders all images to be publicly burnt — Image-worship favoured by popes — Iconoclastse, and Iconolatrae — Charlemagne declares against image-worship — Claudius, bishop of Turin, orders all images to be cast out of the churches — Image- worship established by law in the eastern and western churches, and triumphs till the era of the reformation — Effects of the reformation on image-worship. The invocation of saints — that is, the adoration of, and prayers to, the saints — is a favourite doctrine of the church of Rome. The Council of Trent expressly teaches ; " that the saints reigning with Christ in heaven, offer up and present prayers to God for men, and that those who pray to the saints for their intercession, may expect to have their prayers to God heard with more attention." Though these are not the precise words of the council on the article of invocation of saints, yet it is manifest that such is the meaning of them, and that a belief in the help afforded by saints to their fellow sin- ners in obtaining salvation, is intended to be established by them. This doctrine is so contrary to Scripture, and to common sense, that no one, who has for a moment examined it, can think seriously of setting it down as an article of the Christian faith ; nay, he will immediately 16 170 SIX YEARS IN THE perceive, that it is one of those monstrous absurd doc- trines, with which the Romish church has darkened the clear atmosphere of genuine Christianity. The scriptu- ral arguments by which it is proved heretical and errone- ous are numerous and unanswerable ; but as bringing them forward in this work might be deemed unneces sary and superfluous, I shall on that account omit them. It is a doctrine also directly contrary to common sense ; for it supposes the omnipresence of finite and limited beings, and their being able to hear and attend to, at one and the same time, prayers offered up to them in differ- ent parts of the world — in China and Ireland, Rome and Madrid. This being the attribute of God alone, it cannot then be applied to one of his creatures without derogat- ing from his honour, and robbing him of one of his attri- butes. If it be denied that such a supposition is made ; how then, it may be asked, can the saints hear the re- quests and prayers offered up to them, if they be not near? If they have not the power of hearing such pray- ers ; how then 1 can they attend to them, and intercede with God in favour of the petitioners. It is clear, there- fore, that addressing prayers and petitions to such pow- erless gods — for gods they really are made — is incon- sistent with common sense, and unworthy of a judicious mind. From this erroneous doctrine of the invocation of saints, flow the adoration and worship paid to images, pictures, and relics. This adoration, however it may be excused and got over by the advocates of popery, is cer- tainly in itself positive idolatry. Idolatry is the act of ascribing to things and persons properties which are peculiar to God alone. When the papist ascribes to a certain image, or to a certain picture situated in a certain part of the world, the power of healing the sick, of granting miraculous favours, of protecting from pesti- lence, shipwrecks, &c, does he not ascribe to inanimate, dead, and senseless things properties peculiar to God alone ? Is he not then acting the idolater ? When he bows down to, and worships such an image, or such a picture, for the sake of propitiating it in his favour ; is MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 171 he not then acting idolatrously ? And granting, that he adores, worships, and prays to — not the stone or can- vass, of which the idol or picture is composed — though ninety-nine out of a hundred saint-worshippers really imagine that the idol itself has the power of granting him his petitions, and adores it with the great sincerity accordingly ; for if such an idea did not exist, why would there be a distinction made between the image of a saint situated in one place, and that in another? — even grant- ing that he prays to and adores the person represented by such a picture or image ; is he on that account free from the crime of idolatry ? I should think not ; whereas he gives that adoration to a creature which is due to God alone, and attributes to the same creature a power, which, if he really possessed it, he would be no longer a creature. Nor will it lessen the objection to say, that the creature prayed to is now a sanctified person and enjoying the favour of God, and therefore, that pray- ers are offered to him for the purpose of imploring his intercession at the throne of the Almighty. This ex- cuse, even if it were true, which it is not, as all must confess who have fully examined the subject, would be of no avail, for it would still remain to be accounted for, upon what authority another mediator betioeen God and man, besides the man Christ Jesus, was set up, contrary to the express words of Scripture. Besides, in soliciting the mediation of that creature, the creature itself is adored and worshipped ; but he who worships or adores a crea- ture is an idolater; ergo, it is certain, that all saint- adorers and saint-worshippers are idolaters. But so far from the devotees of saints praying for their intercession and protection, they, for the most part, are confident, that the saints themselves have the immediate power of granting them their request, and therefore, pray to them accordingly, without even once thinking of God, or that he alone has the power of satisfying them. This is fully proved by the practices of the people in those countries, where saint-worship and idolatry is established by law, under the name of Christianity. Their curses, and even their blessings are always invoked in the name 172 SIX YEARS IN THE of some saint. " Che vi venga la maledizione di San Francesco ;" or " la Madonna vi ajuti," — (The curse of St. Francis on you : may the Virgin Mary be your guide,) — are frequent forms of prayer or malediction, in the mouth of every Italian. In Naples, as remarkable for the shrine of St. Januarius, as for the volcano of Vesuvius, whose eruptions are kept in order — so the people believe, and so the priests of his temple preach — • by his blood contained in a vial, it is no uncommon thing to hear the following blasphemous prayer : " O Gesu Christo, prega, ti pregiamo, a san Gennaro a far un miracolo ;" or, " pregalo a concederci questo favore ;" (0 Jesus Christ, we pray thee to pray St. Januarius to perform a miracle, or pray him to grant us this favour, &c.) Thus St. Januarius is placed above Jesus Christ, and the latter is only prayed to for his intercession with the former to perform a miracle, or to grant favours ! J This is the common people's belief; and even if such preposterous language be rejected and condemned by the more enlightened, it nevertheless shows the tendency which saint-worship and images have to make the greater part of the people really and truly idolaters. Its being so glaringly blasphemous, is the reason why it is rejected, at least in part, by the enlightened part of the citizens ; but I am much mistaken, if they do not worship and adore the golden image of their saint,* though in another way, and in different words, with more confidence and devotion, than they approach in prayer the Lord and giver of life ; so that these also justly come under the hateful and anti-christian name of " Idolaters." * The image of St. Januarius, as it stands in the cathedral church of Naples, is of solid silver, washed over with gold. The head and face are wholly of the latter metal. The Neapolitan Lazaroni, when they pray before this image, address it w ith the greatest freedom, and ask its aid in being able to escape detection from some crime, which they propose committing. They generally call this saint by the familiar title of "faccia gialliccia" or yellow face, (his face being of gold,) and promise him so many wax candles, if they succeed in their undertaking. If they do not succeed, they threaten to pull his beard, which, by the way, is also of gold. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 173 It is remarkable that all false religions have the worship of images, more or less, imbodied among their other er- roneous notions of the adoration due to the Supreme Being. The early history of all ages, and of all people, fully proves the truth of this observation. From the unpolished and uncivilized South Sea savages, to the cultivated and polite Greeks and Romans, not less the fathers of the arts and sciences than the Chaldeans, Phoenicians, and Egyptians themselves ; for the former improved and perfected what the latter handed down to them ; all and every one of these nations went after and adored gods made with their own hands ; idolatry being a religion more adapted to the bent which men have toward visible and sensible objects. Men want gods who shall go before them, and be among them, because God, who is everywhere in power, and nowhere in appearance, is hard to be conceived without the light of divine illumination. However excusable, then, these may be in their erroneous notions of the worship suited to a spiritual and unseen God, because not favoured with that light, the modern Romans have only the excuse, that they are led by their priests to imitate their pagan ances- tors in their love of idols ; and who corrupt the word of God, impiously corrupt it, in order to make it speak in favour of their idolatry ; or, when this is impossible, to make it, at least, pass over in silence that abominable crime. For this reason many texts of Scripture are tor- tured into a sense quite different from their real significa- tions, while others are either left out entirely, or mutilated, as has been done with the second commandment ; whereby we are commanded neither to make nor bow down to a graven image, or to the likeness of any creature. And here it may not be deemed foreign to our subject to give a succinct account of the rise and progress of image- worship in the church of Christ. I do it the more will- ingly, as it will give the reader an idea of the horror and detestation in which idolatry was held by the primitive church, and of the opposition it met with, and the blood- shed it caused, before it was finally established, and in- grafted on the pure stock of genuine Christianity. 16* 174 SIX TEARS IN THE It is plain from the practice of the primitive church, recorded by the earlier fathers, that Christians, during the first three centuries, and the greater part of the fourth, neither worshipped images, nor used them in their wor- ship. However, the generality of popish divines main- tain that the use and worship of images are as ancient as the Christian religion itself. To prove this, they bring forward a decree, said to have been made in a council held by the apostles in Antioch, commanding the faithful, that they may not err about the object of their worship, to make images of Christ and worship them. This decree is mentioned by Cardinal Baronius in his Ecclesiastical Annals, under the year of our Lord 102 ; but it is strange that no notice is taken of it till seven hundred years after the apostolic times, after -the dispute about images had commenced. The first instance that occurs, in any credible author, of images among Chris- tians, is that recorded by Tertullian, (De Pudicitia, cap. 10,) of certain cups, or chalices, on which were repre- sented the parable of the good shepherd carrying the lost sheep on his shoulders ; but this instance only proves that the church, at that time, did not think emblematical figures unlawful ornaments of chalices. Another instance is taken from Eusebius, (Ecclesiastical History, lib. vii. cap. 18,) who says, that in his time, (he lived in the be- ginning of the fourth century,) there were to be seen two brass statues in the city of Paneas, or Caesarea Philippi, the one of a woman on her knees, with her arm stretched out, the other of a man over against her, with his hand extended to receive her. These statues were said to be the images of our Saviour, and the woman whom he cured of an issue of blood. From the foot of the statue representing our Saviour, he relates that there sprung up an exotic plant, which, as soon as it grew to the height of touching the border of his garment, was said to cure all sorts of distempers. The historian, however, vouches none of these things ; nay, he supposes, that the woman who erected this statue of our Saviour was a pagan, and ascribe* it to a pagan custom. This supposition is very reasonable, for it is very probable that the woman who MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 175 erected it, was herself afflicted with an issue of blood, and hearing from some Christians, perhaps, that the God whom they worshipped formerly cured a woman afflicted with it, she also, hoping the same effect, and imitating the customs of paganism, erected this statue to conciliate the favour of the Christians' God. It is highly impro- bable then, that the Christians would adore an image set up by the superstition of a pagan woman, for though that image may even represent the God of their own worship, yet it was always brass, or some other matter, which they abhorred to worship. The primitive Christians ab- stained from the worship of images, not, as the papists pretend, from tenderness to heathen idolaters, but because they thought it unlawful in itself to make any image of the Deity. Tertullian, Clemens Alexandrinus, and Ori- gen were of opinion, that, by the second commandment, painting and engraving were unlawful to a Christian, styling them evil and wicked arts. (Tert. De Idolatria, cap. 3. Clem. Alex. Admonitiones ad Gentes, p. 41. Origen contra Celsum, lib. vi. p. 182.) The uses of images in churches, as ornaments, were first introduced by some Christians in Spain, in the be- ginning of the fourth century.; but the practice was con- demned as a dangerous innovation, in a council held at Eliberis, in 305. The custom of admitting pictures of saints and martyrs into churches, (for this was the first source of image-worship,) was rare in the end of the fourth century, but became common in the fifth. But they were still considered only as ornaments, and even in this view, as shall be shown in the sequel, they met with very considerable opposition. In the following century, the custom of thus adorning churches became almost universal, both in the east and west. Petavius expressly says, (De Incarnatione, lib. xv. cap. 14,) that no statues were yet allowed in the churches, because they bore too near a resemblance to the idols of the Gen- tiles. Toward the close of the fourth or beginning of the fifth century, images, which were introduced by way of ornament, and then used as an aid to devotion, began to ba Actually worshipped. However, it continued to be 176 SIX YEARS IN THE the doctrine of the church in the sixth, and in the begin- ning- of the seventh centuries, that images were to be used only as helps to devotion, and not as objects of worship. The worship of them was condemned, in the strongest terms, by Gregory the Great, as appears by two of his letters written in 601. From this time to the beginning of the eighth century, there occurs no instance of any worship given, or allowed to be given, to images, by any council or assembly of bishops whatever. But they were commonly worshipped by the monks and populace, in the beginning of the eighth century ; inso- much that, in 726, when Leo, the Isaurian, published his famous edict, image-worship had already spread into all the provinces subject to the empire. Leo's edict was occasioned by the disturbances which broke out in his reign about the worship of images. By it he abrogated, according to some, the worship of images altogether, and ordered all the images, except that of Christ's crucifixion, to be removed from the churches ; but, according to others, this edict only prohibited the paying to them any kind of adoration or worship. The tumults excited by the contending parties in favour and against image-worship, was the cause of the revolution which deprived Leo's predecessor, Bardanes, of the im- perial throne in 713. The edict published by Leo him- self, in 726, which we have mentioned before, occasioned also a civil war, which broke out in the islands of the Archipelago, and by the suggestions of the priests and monks, ravaged a great part of Asia, and afterward reached Italy. The civil commotions and insurrections in Italy were chiefly promoted by the Roman pontiffs, Gregory I. and II. Leo was excommunicated ; and his subjects, in the Italian provinces, violated their allegiance, and rising in arms, either massacred or banished all the emperor's deputies and officers. In consequence of these proceedings, Leo assembled a council at Constantinople, in 730, which degraded Germanus, bishop of that city, who was a patron of images ; and he ordered all the images to be publicly burnt, and inflicted a variety of punish- ments upon such as were attached to that idolatrous wor- MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 177 ship. Hence arose two factions, one of which adopted the adoration and worship of images, and on that account were called iconolatrae, or image-adorers, (from eiKw, an image, and Xarpeveiv, to adore ;) and the other maintained that such worship was unlawful, and that nothing was more worthy of the zeal of Christians than to demolish and destroy those statutes and pictures which were the occasion of this gross idolatry, and hence they were dis- tinguished by the title of iconoclasts, or image-breakers, (from eiKav, an image, and KXaursiv, to break.) The zeal of Gregory II., in favour of image-worship, was not only imitated, but even surpassed by his successor, Gregory III., in consequence of which the Italian provinces were torn from the Grecian empire. Constantine, called Co- pronymus, in 764, convened a council at Constantinople, regarded by the Greeks as the seventh oecumenical council, which solemnly condemned the worship and usage of images. Those who, notwithstanding the decree of the council, raised commotions in the state, were severely punished, and new laws were enacted to set bounds to the violence of monastic rage. Leo IV., who was proclaimed emperor in 755, pursued the same mea- sures, and had recourse to the coercive influence of penal laws, in order to extirpate idolatry out of the Christian church. Irene, the wife of Leo, having poisoned her husband in 780, assumed the reins of empire during the minority of her son Constantine ; and in 786, summoned a council at Nice, in Bithynia, known by the name of the second Nicene council, which abrogated the laws and decrees passed by former emperors against the new idol- atry, restored the worship of images, and of the cross, and denounced severe punishments against those who maintained that God was the only object of religious adoration. In this contest the Britons, Germans, and Gauls were of opinion that images might be lawfully continued in the churches ; but they considered the worship of them as highly injurious and offensive to the Supreme Being. Charlemagne distinguished himself as a mediator in this controversy ; he ordered four books concerning images to 178 SIX YEARS IN THE be composed, refuting the reasons urged by the Nicene bishops to justify the worship of images, which he sent to Adrian, the Roman pontiff, in 790, in order to engage him to withdraw his approbation of the decrees of the last council of Nice. Adrian wrote an answer ; and in 794, a council of three hundred bishops, assembled by Charle- magne, at Frankfort on the Maine, confirmed the opinion contained in the four books, and solemnly condemned the worship of images. In the Greek church, after the banishment of Irene, the controversy concerning images broke out anew, and was carried on by the contending parties, during the half of the ninth century, with various and uncertain success. The Emperor Nicephorus appears upon the whole to have been an enemy to this idolatrous worship. His successor, Michael Curopalates, surnamed Rhangabe, patronised and encouraged it. But the scene changed on the accession of Leo, the Armenian, to the empire, who assembled a council at Constantinople, in 812, and abolished the de- crees of the Nicene council. His successor, Michael, surnamed Balbus, disapproved of the worship of images, and his son Theophilus, treated their worshippers with great severity. However, the Empress Theodora, after his death, and during the minority of her son, assembled a council at Constantinople in 842, which reinstated the decrees of the second Nicene council, and encouraged image-worship by an edict. The council held at the same place under Protius, in 879, and reckoned by the Greeks the eighth general council, confirmed and renewed the Nicene decrees. In commemoration of this council, a festival was instituted by the superstitious Greeks, called the feast of orthodoxy, which is continued to be cele- brated down to our own days, though very few among them, not even excepting the Greek priests themselves, know the reason of its being instituted. The Latin church of the ninth century was generally of opinion that images might be allowed in the churches for the sake of ornament, or for exciting the devotion of the people ; but it absolutely prohibited that any thing like religious worship or adoration should be paid to them. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 179 The council of Paris, assembled, in 824, by Louis the Meek, confirmed by a decree this general opinion of the western church with regard to images ; and, at the same time, commanded, under pain of punishment, that Chris- tians should regard them in no other light than that of church ornaments : nevertheless, the Gallican clergy began to pay a kind of religious homage to the images of saints, and their examples were followed by the Germans and other nations. However, the enemies to image-wor- ship had still their adherents among the Latins ; the most eminent of whom was Claudius, bishop of Turin, who, in 823, ordered all images, and even the cross, to be cast out of the churches, and committed to the flames ; and he wrote a treatise, in which he declared both against the use and worship of them. He condemned relics, pilgrim- ages to the Holy Land, and all voyages to the tombs of saints ; and to his writings and labours it was owing, that the city of Turin, and the adjacent country, was, for a long time after his death, much less infected with super- stition than the other parts of Europe. The controversy concerning the sanctity of images, was again revived by Leo, bishop of Chalcedon, in the eleventh century, on occasion of the Emperor Alexius's converting the figures of silver that adorned the portals of the churches into money, in order to supply the exigencies of the state. The bishop obstinately maintained that he had been guilty of sacrilege, and published a treatise, in which he affirmed that in these images there resided an inherent sanctity, and that the adoration of Christians ought not to be confined to the persons represented by these images, but should be extended to the images themselves. The emperor assembled a council at Constantinople, which determined that the images of Christ and of the saints were to be honoured only with a relative worship ; and that the invocation and worship were to be addressed to the saints only, as the servants of Christ, and on account of their relation to him as their master. Leo, dissatisfied with these absurd and superstitious decisions, was sent into banishment. Had he lived some centuries later, or down to our own days, he would have little cause to be 180 SIX TEARS IN THE dissatisfied ; for he would find images and pictures adored and prayed to, even more than he himself pointed out in his treatise ; and would find his own theory of their inherent sanctity fully practised upon. From this time forward, image-worship was established both in the eastern and western churches without receiving any opposition, except from the Albigenses, Waldenses, and others, who were too few in number and too weak to cause any obstacle to this idolatrous practice, till the middle of the sixteenth century, the era of the reformation, when it was abolished in many parts of the Christian world. It was again confirmed by the Council of Trent about the same time, and is now practised to an extent which it seldom reached before, in every part of the globe where popery prevails. CHAPTER XXI. Image-worship in the nineteenth century — Statue of St. Peter — Opinions as to its identity with one of the pagan divinities of ancient Rome — Story illustrating the vengeance which it takes on those who dishonour it — Another, whereby it becomes clear that his brazen saintship has the power of protecting his devout worship- pers — Reflections. Having in the foregoing chapter given a succinct history of the rise and progress of images and image-worship, according to the views of the best writers on the subject ; I shall in this and some following chapters, endeavour to give some account of the practice of that idolatry on the continent of Europe, and in other places where popery triumphs. There are very few churches in Rome that are not distinguished for the possession of some wonderful and miracle-working image or picture. The prayers, and consequently the offerings presented at the shrine of those idols, are the sources of great emoluments to the priests attached to their service, and therefore the latter use all the means in their power to cherish and excite the popular devotion toward them. To begin with St. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 181 Peter's ; that splendid edifice, so renowned through the whole civilized world for the beauty of its architecture, and for the other stupendous master-pieces of the arts with which it is adorned ; its very portal, on which are represented in relievo-figures the actions and miracles of deified men, announces it, at once, as a place dedicated to idolatrous worship. The visiter does not advance more than ten steps up its magnificent and awe-inspiring aisle, before he must lament to find a temple nominally designed for the worship of the true God, polluted by the monstrous superstitions of idolatry. He will observe the bronze statue of St. Peter, seated in a chair of the same metal, and armed in the one hand with the insignia of his office — the keys, as being gate-keeper of heaven — while with the other, he seems in the act of bestowing a bless- ing upon those, who, after having humbly adored him upon their knees, are advancing to kiss his brazen foot, extended for that purpose. This statue, or rather idol, placed on his right hand side after entering the church, strongly reminds the visiter of the soul-destroying idolatry practised in the church of Rome. Not far from this, but nearer to the door, he will see another practical example of the system, by which men are led to place their hopes of salvation — -not upon the all-atoning blood of Christ — but on the inventions of their fellow men ; he will ob- serve the vessel for holy water, guarded by two marble angels, with wings expanded, and of exquisite workman- ship, overflowing with that water, which (so teacheth the Roman church) freeth from venial sins.* Thus is * The aqua sancta, or the holy water, is manifestly another rem- nant of the pagan superstition, which is to be found scattered through the rites and ceremonies of the church of Rome. It corresponds with the aqua lustralis of the ancients, and seems also to be imitated by the Mahometans, who, in a copious shower of clear water, wash themselves from their sins. The Mahometan ablutions and the popish sprinklings are, then, reducible to one and the same thing — the obtaining remission of sin. The Mahometan way is much the cleaner, and therefore to be preferred ; for it at least cleanses the body, whereas popish holy water is very often suffered to remain in the churches till it gets into a state of corruption, and thus becomes highly detrimental to the health of the people. I have often seen a greenish slime upon it in some churches. 17 182 SIX YEARS IN THE the blood of Christ, that (alone) cleanseth from all sin, rendered invalid by the substitution of other atonements. The idol statue of St. Peter is supposed to have been worshipped by the ancient Romans under the name of Jupiter Stator ; and to have been transformed into a Chris- tian saint,* when idolatrous corruption first broke forth in the Western churches ; which event may be dated, as we have already seen, from the beginning of the seventh century. It is true, that there are many opinions afloat respecting the original design and title of it ; some de- fending its identity with Jupiter Stator ; others again with Jupiter Capitolinus ; while not few assert, that it had been the statue of the two-faced Janus, and that the latter's head was knocked off to make room for the head of St. Peter. All agree, however, that it formerly repre- sented a heathen god, and that very little alteration was made in it, in order to render it a fitting object for Chris- tian adoration ; which adoration it never received with greater marks of devotion and respect, while in the character of a Jupiter, than it now receives in its charac- ter of first pope and gate-keeper of heaven. happy piece of brass ! (the reader will exclaim,) to be thus raised to divine honours ! Thrice happy indeed, if it could feel those honours; but unfortunately, "it has eyes, but can- not see," and " ears, but cannot hear." If it could either hear or see, it would blush and be ashamed of seeing itself, a creature, adored, instead of God the Creator, and would thus show itself more modest than the soi-disant Vicar of Christ, who not only suffers himself to be adored daily by those whom his false doctrines have led out of the right path, but even claims that adoration as his right. There are many fables related by monkish annalists concerning the power attributed to this idol, and the many favours obtained from its munificent hands by devout * Pope seems to allude to this custom of converting the images of heathen gods into Christian saints, in the following verses : " Till Peter's keys some christen 'd Jove adorn, And Pan to Moses lends his pagan horn ; See graceless Venus to a virgin turn'd." Dunciad, Book III. . MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 133 worshippers ; and also concerning- the punishment which had been inflicted on those who dared, in any way, tres- pass against its majesty, or use it with irreverence. I shall mention one or two stories of this kind, for the purpose of exhibiting the manner in which image-wor- ship is upheld in the church of Rome, and the ridiculous fables that are brought forward by its advocates in proof of its acceptance with the Supreme Being. Many men, perhaps more than thirty, are daily em- ployed at St. Peter's, whose duty it is to keep the church clean, and wipe the dust from the altars, statues, pictures, &c. One of these men, in a moment of gayety, resolved to have a laugh at the worshippers of the brazen idol, St. Peter. For this purpose, he procured some grease and lampblack, and mixing them well together, he watched an opportunity, when no one was present, to besmear with the composition the foot of St. Peter, which is un- usually bright from the number of kisses bestowed upon it by the superstitious worshippers. Having laid his snare, he betook himself to another part of the church, where he could observe those that entered ; and who, as is the custom, first go to the holy water vessel, and wash themselves with a drop of the purificatory water from their venial sins, after which they advance to pay their devoirs to St. Peter, and kiss his foot. He anticipated no small share of amusement and food for laughter, in seeing those who kissed the idol's foot, retreating with blacken- ed lips and face from their act of devotion. He had not remained long on the watch, when a foreign bishop, with his attaches of five or six priests, entered the church ; and after having been freed from their venial sins by a drop of the sacred element, they, like true papicolists, advanced to the adoration of St. Peter. Having repeated a few pater-nosters on their knees before the image, they pro- ceeded to kiss its foot ; the bishop showing the example, as it was meet, he being the first in dignity. He carried off, in reward for his devotion, as may be supposed, no small share of the lampblack, with which it was besmear- ed ; and on being imitated by his followers, they also were not left without their share of it. The plan succeeded 184 SIX YEARS IN THE so far, to the satisfaction of the wag that devised it. The parties concerned were as yet unconscious of their black lips and faces, and continued their walk through the church, looking at the pictures and examining the statues. They wondered, however, what was ridiculous about them, that they excited the laughter of all whom they met. On looking in the faces of each other, they soon discovered how the affair stood, and they themselves could not refrain from laughter, when they saw the figure which their leader, monseignor the bishop, exhibited with his blackened face. Having retired into one of the sacristies, they obtained water, and with it performed for their faces what they imagined the holy water had done for their souls a little before. Inquiries were made for the perpetrator of the horrid deed ; but no one could be found on whom suspicion could fall; no one, in fine, knew any thing about it. In the course of the day, one of the men mounted a moveable scaffolding, made* for the purpose of brushing cobwebs from the ceiling and from other elevated parts of the church, and while in the act of performing his office, his foot accidentally slipped, and he fell headlong from a height of more than twenty feet. His companions ran to his assistance, but he, alas ! was speechless. Instead of procuring surgical aid, the whole cry was for the " holy oil" in order to anoint him. While the priest was anointing him, he uttered a few indistinct words, from which the bystanders could gather that he was the person who impiously pro- faned the statue of St. Peter. The words that he uttered were, " O San Pietro, sei vindicate" (O Saint Peter, thou art revenged.) In fact, the sufferer turned out to be the wag who had polluted St. Peter's foot. Being carried to one of the public hospitals, he there recovered so far as to be able to confess the whole occurrence, and to ac- knowledge that the accident which befell him was a just punishment for his impiety. He died shortly after — fortunately indeed for himself, for had he recovered, he would have been sent to the galleys for life. This acci- dent afforded a theme to the monks and other priests for preaching the great power of the idol statue, and the MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 185 punishment which all those are sure to meet with who impiously commit any thing against the honour and respect due to it. A pamphlet was shortly after published by order of the pope, wherein were related the miracles per- formed by the agency of the brazen St. Peter, and the signal vengeance, which, on more occasions than one, the latter had taken on those that dishonoured his statue. A procession composed of all the clergy in Rome was made to the image in order to appease the wrath of the angry deity — not God, but Peter or his idol — and many days' indulgences were granted to all who devoutly salute and kiss his brazen foot on entering the church. Thus an accident, which may as well have happened to the greatest devotee in the church, as to the one who, through levity, seemingly dishonoured the statue, was made a foundation on which to build up new lying wonders, and thereby stir up the people to an increase of devotion toward the wooden and brazen gods of popery. The foregoing story may serve for an example of the punishment which St. Peter inflicts upon those who dare dishonour his image ; the following will exemplify the rewards he bestows upon his faithful worshippers. A Roman lady of a respectable family, being involved by unavoidable misfortunes in great pecuniary difficulties, had recourse to the brazen image of St. Peter, as her last hope of obtaining wherewith to support her rank in society, and give her children an education suitable to their birth. She was left a widow with a large family. Her husband had died suddenly, and his property was seized upon by his creditors. She had, while living in affluence, a very great devotion toward the image of St. Peter, which is worshipped in the church called after his name at Rome, and was wont for a number of years to visit it daily, and prostrating herself before it, to pour forth her soul in prayer and thanksgiving. This pious exercise she did not discontinue on being plunged into poverty ; nay, poverty had quite a contrary effect upon her, for it only made her more urgent in her pray- ers, and excited her to cast her afflictions at the feet of the blessed apostle, and confidently demand his assist- 17* * ♦ 186 SIX TEARS IN THE ance. The greater number of her children were females, (the legend does not say how many they were in all,) two of whom were now marriageable, and although of handsome persons, they were nevertheless unable to find' any young men, their equals, who would be willing to take them as wives, on account of their want of fortune. One of them was sought in marriage by a rich man, who, upon discovering her want of dowry, withdrew his suit. This was most painful to the afflicted mother, who had no other way to assuage her grief, than to proceed, as usual, to St. Peter's, and recommend herself and family to the protection of the prince of the apostles. The blessed apostle, compassionating the poor woman's afflic- tion, and being, moreover, well pleased* with the heart- felt devotion she exhibited toward himself, resolved to mitigate her sufferings, and present her with the means of portioning her daughters. For this purpose, he ap- peared to her a dream, and commanded her to approach the throne of his successor in the government of the Christian church, and lay open to him her difficulties, adding, that he himself would prepare the mind of the vicar of Christ for her reception. She, upon awaking from sleep, recollected the dream, but imagining it to be a delusion of the imagination, neglected to perform what she was commanded. On returning to the church the following day, she cast herself, as she was accustomed to do, on her knees before the image of St. Peter, and renewed her former supplications. The apostle appear- ed to her again, while in an ecstasy on her knees, and chided her for not obeying his commands. She con- sidered this second vision, as well as the first, a delusion; and accordingly treated it as such. In fine, St. Peter * This will bring to the reader's memory the description of sa- crifices offered up to appease the wrath of an offended heathen god. The description of such sacrifices are frequently to be met with in the ancient Greek and Latin poets. The god in whose honour they are performed is represented " well pleased" with the odour of the burnt-offerings. The modern god Peter is represented by his de- votees well pleased with the prayers offered up to himself; without considering, how much such prayers derogate from the honour due to the only true God. •♦ • MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 187 appeared to her the third time, (there is some great virtue attached to the number "//iree," by popular superstition,) and with an angry countenance commanded her to pro- ceed forthwith to his successor, the reigning pope, and ask from him in his (St. Peter's) name, for as much as might be sufficient for the decent maintenance of herself and family. She now resisted no longer ; and immediate- ly set about obtaining access to the throne of his holiness ; being confident, that the communication made to her was not a delusion of the imagination, but had its foundation in truth. On obtaining an audience, and after going through the usual ceremonies practised by all who ap- proach the presence of the vicar of Christ, (such as kiss- ing the slipper, falling upon the knees, &c.) she related the visions with which she had been favoured by the prince of the apostles ; and how he had commanded her to lay her necessities and troubles before him, his suc- cessor in the government of the church. The holy father (thus the pope is styled) listened to her with kindness and attention ; and after she had concluded her address, told her that he himself had also been visited by St. Peter, who exhorted him to receive with kindness a poor widow, who would in a short time present herself before him. He then related his own vision to the surrounding attendants, all of whom fell on their knees, and adored the holy representative of Christ, who was thus manifest- ly guided in his actions by the influence of the Holy Spirit. He exhorted the holy widow to persevere in her devotion toward the image of St. Peter, and promised to provide from the public treasury for herself and her children. This promise was fulfilled a short time after- ward ; an annuity was settled upon the widow by com- mand of his holiness, and her children were provided for in different ways ; some being established in the married state, and others dedicated to the service of the church, in which they became useful members, through the powerful protection of their patron, the brazen idol of St. Peter. Thus (continues the annalist) was this pious widow and her family relieved from poverty and distress by the favour of the blessed apostle, who took that method 188 SIX YEARS IN THE to reward those who were devoted to his worship. By her example, all should be excited to a firm reliance upon his power and goodness, and to a heartfelt adoration of his sacred image. By such absurd and ridiculous tales as these related, is the popular superstition kept alive, and the minds of the people imbued with the soul-killing system of idolatry, which Rome teaches her followers in lieu of the life- giving truth as it is in Jesus. By giving credence to the lying wonders and nonsensical inventions of monks, and other self-interested men, they are led to place their hopes, not only of temporal blessings, but also of ever- lasting salvation, on the intercession and protection of the saint, whose image they worship with peculiar devo- tion, and not on the providential care of God, and the all-sufficient atonement of his Son. Indeed, so deluded do the people become by the incessant repetition of such tales by their priests, in the confessional, pulpit, and pri- vate conversations, that they almost lose all forms of Christian worship, and give themselves up entirely to the worship of the fictitious gods of brass and wood. Among the uneducated peasantry, especially, fables of this kind gain the greatest credence. Nothing is talked of in their meetings and conversations with each other, but the favours bestowed on some of their neighbours at the in- tercession of Saint Such-a-one, whose image is worship- ped in such a place. If their sheep should be infected with the rot, or their vineyards destroyed by hail, do they, perhaps, recur to Him who alone can effectually assist them ? No, indeed, for this would be too much like Christianity. By the advice of the priest, masses must be celebrated and candles offered at the shrine of some saint, in order to appease the anger of the god who inhabits it. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 18& CHAPTER XXII. Images of the Virgin Mary — La Santa Casa di Loretto — History of the Holy House — Income of the priests attached to it — Sale of vermin — The miraculous image of the Virgin Mary at Basil — Ex- pedient of the priests for reviving the dying superstition — Letter of the Virgin Mary to a reformed clergyman — Notes explanatory of the foregoing letter — Late repentance — Litany of the Virgin — St. Peter, gate-keeper of heaven — Gulielmus— ^George — St. An- thony, protector of swine — Different offices assigned to the crowd of saints in the popish calendar— -Reflections. Were I to make separate mention of half the wonder- ful images which are scattered up and down through the different churches of Italy, I should be obliged to trans- gress the limits laid down for this work : indeed, a simple catalogue of their names alone would fill a good-sized volume. I shall, therefore, not to tire the reader, con- fine myself to a few of the more remarkable, passing over in silence those of less note. Of the former class, wherever they are to be found, whether at Rome or Turin, Milan or Naples, the images of the Madonna are always held in the greatest estimation, and innumerable miracles are said to be performed in favour of those who devoutly pray before them. The Madonna answers in every respect to a heathen goddess, and perhaps the worship paid to her different pictures and statues is more revolting than that paid to the celebrated image of the Ephesian Diana. Her statues and pictures are so numerous, that, had she the power of animating one- fourth of them, she could justly be said to have acquired in some degree the attribute of ubiquity, if not in her own person, at least in that of the various statues and pictures by which she is represented. Some of these, but especially the pictures, are master-pieces of art ; while others, on the contrary, do not in any way flatter the Virgin for her personal beauty. They are, however, generally of the former class ; some countenances being 190 SIX YEARS IN THE so exquisitely beautiful that they probably gave rise to the well known verses of a late poet, who, when relating the early education of his Spanish hero, represents him as Turning from martyrs and hermits hairy, To the sweet pictures of the Virgin Mary. Pictures and images of the Madonna are placed in the principal streets of Rome and other cities, to which are affixed lamps, kept burning all night in honour of the goddess. Indulgences are granted to all who bow down before them, and repeat a few Pater-nosters and Ave Marias in their honour. A tablet is always attached* to the frame, or to some other part of the picture, on which is written its history, the manner it was discovered, and the numerous favours obtained at its intercession. Some are related to have been sent down from heaven ; others, to have fled of their own accord from the hands of Turks, or other infidels ; others, to have moved the head or eyes ; in fine, there is no picture of the Ma- donna to which popular superstition does not attribute some miracle or other. The number of days' or years' indulgences to be obtained for the trouble of repeating a "Pater-noster" and "Ave Maria," is then related, followed by the signature and seal of the pope or bishop by whom such indulgences have been granted. The usual form of these grants is conceived in words of the following import, either in Latin or Italian, but more frequently in the latter language : — Monseignor N , or Sua Santita N , concede un anno, d'indulgenza a tutti li fedeli, per ogni volta, che divotamente recitano " un Pater-noster ed un Ave Maria," avanti questa sacra imagine di Maria santissima. (The Most Reverend Bishop N , or His Holiness N , grants one year's indulgence to all the faithful for every time they devoutly repeat "the Lord's prayer, and the hail Mary" before this sacred image of the most holy Mary.) The image of the Virgin, to which all her other images yield the palm, is that worshipped at Loretto, an insignificant village in the pope's states. This image is preserved in the " Santa Casa," or Holy House, which MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 191 tradition reports — and the pope has sealed such a report with his infallible authority, so as to make it an article of faith, and therefore essential to the salvation of man — to have been transported by angels from Nazareth to Dalmatia, and thence to the papal states, where it now remains. In a book, expressly designed for instructing in the miracles and history of the Holy House, the pil- grims who come in crowds from all parts of Italy, and other countries, in order to pay their devoirs to the Vir- gin, there may be found the following narrative of the manner in which the papal states obtained possession of this miraculous house, and of the equally miraculous image and relics which are preserved in it for the adora- tion of the faithful. This book is called " La storia della casa miracolosa della Vergine Maria Lauretana," (The history of the miraculous house of the Virgin Mary of Loretto.) printed at the Vatican press, and approved by the " Master of the sacred apostolic palace," — colla ap- provazione della sacra aula apostolica. Hence there can be no doubt, that the monstrous lies which are imbodied in it are sanctioned by the authority of the infallible church, and of its equally infallible head, the pope. It begins with the bull of Pope Somebody, confirming its contents, and anathematizing, as usual, all who would call in question the truth of any thing related in it. It then goes on to inform its reader that the Holy House was built in Nazareth of Galilee by Joachim, the father of the Virgin Mary, and that, at his death, he bequeathed it to his beloved daughter,, the mother of Christ. That Jesus was educated, and lived in this same house for twelve years, and assisted Joseph, his mother's husband, who exercised the trade of a carpenter under its roof. After the death of Mary — who, by-the-way, is believed to have been taken alive into heaven, by what authority, I never could learn — the house continued in the posses- sion of her nearest in kindred till the time of Titus Vespasian, who, with his conquering army, devastated Galilee, and razed the town of Nazareth to the ground. The Holy House was at this time protected by a corps of angels, sent down from heaven to guard it, so that 192 SIX YEARS IN THE Titus could not remove one single stone, or cause any damage to it. It remained quietly in Nazareth till the year 1291, when, Galilee falling into the hands of the infidels, and every Christian being put to the sword, the Holy House thought it full time to consult for its own preservation. It, accordingly, commanded its angel- guards to lift it from its foundations and transfer it to some Christian country. The angels, obedient to the commands, immediately complied, and bare it through the air into Dalmatia. There it remained for three years, when, taking offence at the irreverence with which it was treated by the inhabitants, it again emigrated, and, by the same agency as on the former occasion, it was set down in a wood convenient to the town of Recanati, in the papal state. The trees bowed down to the ground at its approach, and thus remained in reverence during the eight months it remained in their neighbourhood. But being of a migratory disposition, and unwilling to bear the seclusion in which it was held by being stationed in the middle of a thick forest, it again took flight, and established itself contentedly at Loretto, where it now remains. Nor is it likely that it will soon leave the lat- ter place, for it is imprisoned in a magnificent church, built designedly for that purpose. " Thus," (says this veracious history,) " has God vouchsafed to grant to the country, wherein he established the chief seat of his religion, a convincing proof of the estimation in which that country is held by him ; and a sure refuge in the hour of peril to those who flee for protection under the wings of the mother of his Son — sotto Vale delta madre del suo jiglio.'''' This image, to which so many miracles are attributed, and before which so many disgusting scenes of worse than pagan idolatry are daily practised, is black, and so extremely ugly, that certainly it cannot be for its beauty that it is held in such estimation. It is gaudily dressed, and literally laden with magnificent jewels, and other precious articles. An infant, representing the child Jesus, is placed in its arms, of the same colour as the mother, and also surrpunded by a magnificent show of MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 193 finery. Devotees come from all parts of Italy on pil- grimages to this shrine, to whom the dust of the walls, the cobwebs, nay, even the very spiders, are sold at ex- traordinary prices ; for the image and house are not only holy themselves, but also give holiness to whatever is touched by them. I have seen myself, on visiting Loretto about four years ago, a pebble taken from the walls of the Santa Casa, sold for ten Roman scudi, or dollars, and an unfortunate mouse, that was found con- cealing itself among the folds of the Virgin's dress, sold for as much as would buy a good ox. This mouse was embalmed by the gentleman who bought it, — a Piedmont- ese pilgrim, — and enclosed in a silver box, to be kept by him and his posterity as a certain and infallible remedy against all diseases and accidents. But, about relics, more in the sequel. Every mass celebrated within the Santa Casa is paid for at the most extraordinary price. I have been assured by the keepers of the house, who were monks of my own order — Capuchins ; that between masses and lands, and the gifts of the pilgrims, the annual income of the church at Loretto amounts to more than 50,000 dollars. The French army, while in Italy, took the liberty of depriving the Madonna of the greater part of her treasure, having pillaged the church of whatever things of value they could lay hands upon. The chest, in which were preserved some valuable gems, was secreted by one of the old priests, and by him restored after the French evacuated Italy. This act of honesty is really worthy of praise, if it were done through an unwillingness to keep what did not belong to him ; but it is very probable, that his virtue would hardly resist the temptation, had the gems belonged to any less powerful personage than the Madonna, and I am, therefore, inclined to think, that superstition had a greater influence on his mind than natural honesty. Be that as it may, it is certain that the gems saved from the French soldiery were returned, and are now used for de- corating the person of her smutty majesty, the queen of heaven. There is a dean and chapter attached to the church of Loretto, whose duty it is to recite daily the 18 194 SIX YEARS IN THE office of the Madonna, and of some other saints, for which they receive a princely salary. Twelve Capuchins are also of the goddess' household, and these have the care of the holy house, as it would be deemed a mortal sin, and to be atoned for only by death, if any one less than a priest dared to enter the presence of the queen. To them, there- fore, it belongs to sweep and clean the holy house, and to collect the sanctified dust, the insects, vermin, and all other things, of no value in themselves, but of the great- est, when touched, either designedly or accidentally, by the garments or any other thing belonging to the Holy Virgin. Nor is this all, the things touched by the image have also received the power of sanctifying other things in turn ; but the latter are esteemed of minor efficacy than the former, and therefore are not so much sought after. The Capuchins are paid so much annually for their ser- vices, as domestics of the Virgin — -I believe 500 dollars each ; and have also no small emolument from the sale of the sweepings which they collect, and which, or rather the money obtained for them from idiotical pilgrims, they are obliged to divide fairly with the other persons belong- ing to her majesty's suit. Thus the Italian proverb " vendere lucciole per lanterne" — to sell fire-flies for lan- terns, is literally acted upon by those deceivers of the souls of their fellow creatures. A relation of the many fables and pseudo-miracles which are propagated by the priests and monks attached to the service of the Lauretan goddess, would be found quite uninteresting to the reader. I shall, therefore, pass them over in silence, only remarking, that they are so numerous as to fill five ponderous folio volumes, entitled, in Latin, " Flores et Miracula Virgines Mariae Lauretanae :" — (The flowers and miracles of the Virgin Mary of Loretto ;) and so ridiculous and glaringly false as to make the most zealous advocates of popery blush for the honour and ve- racity of their infallible church ; — and this is saying a great deal, for it is no easy matter to make either popish divines or popish annalists blush through consciousness of having committed to writing a monstrous farrago of lies, especially when they are aware that such falsehoods MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 195 were fabricated for " the good of the church," and that, therefore, the end always excuses the means. There existed a famous miracle-working image of the Madonna in the city of Basil, before the reformation. This image was of stone, and drew pilgrims from all parts of Italy and France to its shrine, whence the priests, attached to its service, derived great emoluments. Upon the breaking out of the reformation in Germany, and when the people began to be instructed in the pure reli- gion of Christ, pilgrimages to the shrine of this idol became every day less frequent, and as gospel light made greater progress, they were discontinued altogether. This was severely felt by the priests, who, in order to make a last struggle for the revival of the nearly extinct superstition, thought upon an expedient, by which they hoped to recover in part their unhallowed gains. Ridiculous as it may seem, this was no other than to forge a letter ad- dressed to the people of Basil, which they gave out to be written in heaven by the Virgin Mary herself, and brought by angels who placed it at the foot of her statue, where it was found by a pious priest, devoted to the worship of the marble virgin. In this letter she chides the people for their want of devotion toward her image, and, like another offended Diana, threatens them with heavy chas- tisement, unless they immediately make reparation to her insulted deity. Erasmus has founded his letter of the Virgin, written also in heaven, to a Lutheran minister of the 15th century, on this forgery of the priests of Basil. He wittily ridicules the prevailing superstition of that period, and makes the Virgin say, what very probably she would say, had she been able to hear the blasphemous prayers and vows offered up at her shrines by the de- luded victims of popish errors. It may not be thought superfluous to give the letter entire, as it exists in the colloquy called " peregrinatio religionis ergo," (wander- ing through religious motives.) It is addressed under a fictitious name to some zealous reformed clergyman of that period, and is feigned to have been found by him in the pulpit, on his ascending it to address his congregation : " Mary, the mother of Jesus, to Glaucoplutus, health. 196 SIX YEARS IN THE Because following the doctrines of Luther, you teach that it is useless to invoke the saints, know, that you have obtained great favour with me on this account. For, before your preaching, but little was wanting that I was not killed from listening to the wicked petitions of man- kind. From me alone every thing was demanded, as if my son was for ever to remain an infant, as he is painted in my arms ; and as if he entirely depended upon my will, and would not dare deny any thing which I might be pleased to ask of him, fearing lest I, in turn, should deny him the breast, which he would feel desirous to drink. Sometimes these my worshippers, demand from me, a virgin, things which a modest youth could scarcely have the face to ask from a woman of ill fame ; things, indeed, which I am ashamed to commit to writing. The merchant setting out for Spain recommends to my care the chastity of his concubine. The nun, dedicated to God, thinking upon flying from her nunnery, and having thrown aside her veil, leaves to my care the fame of her integrity, which she herself is on the point of prostituting. The impious soldier, hired to butcher his fellow creatures, cries out before me, ' blessed Virgin, give me a plenti- ful harvest of plunder.' The gamester cries out, ' Favour me, O goddess ; a part of the gains will be given to you :' and if the game should turn against him, he reproaches and curses me, because I was not propitious and favour- able to his wickedness. The harlot, who lets out her body for hire, prays, ' Give me an abundant income ;' and if I deny her, then she exclaims, 'that I am not a mother of mercy.'' The prayers of others are not so wicked as they are foolish. The unmarried girl exclaims, * Give me, O holy Mary, a handsome and rich husband.' The married, ' Give me handsome children.' The en- ceinte, 'Give me an easy accouchement.'' The old woman, * Grant me a lpng life, without cough or thirst.' The childish old man, ' Grant me the power of again becoming young.' The philosopher prays for the power of form- ing incomprehensible arguments ; the priest prays for a rich benefice ; the bishop, for the protection of his church ; the sailor, for prosperous voyages ; the courtier, for a sin- MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 197 cere confession of his sins at the hour of death ; (*) the farmer, for seasonable rain ; the farmer's wife, for the health and preservation of the cattle. If I deny any of these favours, immediately I am called ' a cruel woman ;' and if I send them to my son, I am then answered, ' he wishes whatever you wish.' Thus on me alone, a wo- man and a virgin, is thrown the care of sailors, soldiers, merchants, gamesters, bachelors, women in travail, kings, and husbandmen. But I am now less troubled with busi- ness of this kind, for which I should have been very thank- ful to you, had not this advantage brought with it also disadvantages : there is less trouble, but there is also less honour, and less emoluments. Before your preaching, I was saluted ' Queen ( 2 ) of the heavens? * Mistress of the world ;' now I scarcely hear from a few worshippers * Hail, Mary.'' Before, I was clad in gems and gold ; I had a well supplied wardrobe ; rich gifts were offered to me : now I am scarcely covered with the half of an old cloak, and that same gnawed by mice ; while my annual income is scarcely sufficient for .the support of one mise- rable priest, who might light a little lamp, or a tallow- candle in honour of me. But I could even suffer these things, degrading as they are, had not even worse been in preparation. You have a design, people say, of thrusting out of the sacred temples the whole crowd of gods ! (saints !) Beware, again and again beware of what you are about. There are not wanting to the other gods ways and means of revenging the injuries committed against their majesty. If Peter ( 3 ) be shut out of the temple, take care that he, in retaliation, shut not against you the gate of the heavenly kingdom. Paul( 4 ) has a sword, and Bartholomew ( 5 ) is armed with a knife ; William, under the habit of a monk, will be found encased in a heavy coat of mail, and brandishing a long spear. ( 6 ) But how are you to defend yourself against George, ( 7 ) a knight, surrounded with armed men, and formidable both on account of his lance and sword 1 Nor is Anthony ( 8 ) himself unarmed, for he has the sacred fire. There are also their peculiar arms to the other gods, which they use in inflicting on their enemies sickness, and other mis- 18* 198 SIX YEARS IN THE fortunes, which cannot be cured without the invocation of their assistance. ( 9 )* As for my own part, you cer- tainly shall not thrust me, though unarmed, from the temple, unless you also thrust out my son, whom I hold in my arms. I will not suffer myself to be violently separated from him ; for either you must turn him out with me, or suffer both of us to remain, unless, indeed, you choose rather a temple without a Christ. These things I wished to make known to you ; do you ponder what answer is to be returned to me, for I am deeply interested in the subject. Dated from my marble temple, on the calends of August, in the year of my crucified son, 1524. I, a marble virgin, have signed it with my own hand. Mary-Virgin, the Mother of Jesus. I subjoin the original Latin, for the satisfaction of those who may feel desirous of seeing this curious epis- tle in its original language. It is, like all other of Eras- mus' writings, written with classical purity, and in a style well worthy of imitation by all lovers of pure latinity. It is, indeed, widely different from the barba- risms of the greater part of Romish theologians, who had not even the merit of conveying their errors in beau- tiful language ; indeed, the whole, merit of their works consisted in being incomprehensible. Maria mater JesuGlaucopluto S. D. Quod Lutherum sequutus strenue suades, supervacaneum esse invocare divos, a me quidem isto nomine bonam magnamque inivisti gratiam, scito. Nam ante hoc, tantum non enecabar improbis mortalium opplorationibus. Ab una postulabantur omnia, quasi nlius meus semper infans esset, quia talis fingitur, pingiturque in sinu meo, ut ex nutu matris adhuc pendeat, neque quidquam ausit negare petenti, videlicet metuens, ne si quid neget roganti, ego vicissim ipsi negem mammam sitienti. Et nonnunquam ea petunt a Virgine, quae verecundus juvenis vix auderet petere a lena, quaeque me pudet litteris committere. In- * See notes from (1) to (9) at the end of this chapter. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 199 terim negotiator lucri causa navigaturus in Hispaniam, committit mihi pudicitiam suae concubinae. Et virgo Deo sacra, abjecto velo fugam adornans, deponit apud me famam integritatis suae, quam ipsa tendit prostituere. Occlamat mihi miles et ad laniendam conductus, Beata Virgo, da praedam opimam. Occlamat aleator, Fave, diva, pars lucri tibi decidetur. Et si parum faveat alea, me conviciis lacerant, maleque precantur, quae non adfu- erim sceleri. Occlamat quae quaestui turpi semet exponit, Da proventum uberem. Si quid negem, illico reclamant, Ergone sis mater misericordiae. Aliorum vota non tarn impia sunt, quam inepta. Clamat innupta, Da mihi for- mosum ac divitem sponsum. Clamat nupta, Da mihi bel- los catulos. Clamat gravida, Da mihi facilem partum. Clamat anus : Da diu vivere sine tussi sitique. Clamat senex delirus : Da repubescere. Clamat philosophus : Da nodos insolubiles nectere. Clamat sacerdos : Da sacerdotium opimum. Clamat episcopus : Serva meam ecclesiam. Clamat nauta : Da prosperos cursus. Clamat aulicus : Da vere confiteri in articulo mortis. Clamat rusticus : Da tempestivam pluviam. Clamat rustica : Serva gregem et armentum incolume. Si quid renuo, illico sum crudelis. Si relego ad filium, audio : Vult ille, quidquid tu vis. Itane ego sola et mulier et virgo dabo operam navigantibus, belligerantibus, negotiantibus, ludentibus aleam, nubentibus, parturientibus, regibus, et agricolis ? Atqui quod dixi, minimum est prae his quae patior. Sed his negotiis nunc multo minus gravor : quo quidem nomine tibi gratias agerem maximas, nisi com- modum hoc incommodum majus secum traheret : plus est otii, sed minus est honorum, minus est opum. Antea salutabar Regina ccelorum, Domini mundi : nunc vix a paucis audio, Ave Maria. Antea vestiebar gemmis et auro, abundabam mutatoriis, deferebantur aurea gem- meaque donaria : nunc vix tegor dimidiato palliolo, eoque corroso a muribus. Proventus autem annui vix tan turn, ut alam miserum cedituum, qui accendat lucernulam aut candelam sebaceam. Atque haec tamen poterant ferri, ni majora etiam moliri dicereris. Hue tendis, ut ajunt, ut quidquid usquam est divorum, exigas ex aedibus sacris. 200 SIX YEARS IN THE Etiam atque etiam, vide quid agas. Non deest aliis divis quo suam ulciscantur injuriam. Ejectus e templo Petrus, potest tibi vicessim occludere regni coelestis ostium. Paulus habet gladium ; Bartholemaeus cultro armatus est ; Guilielmus sub pallio monachi totus arma- tus est, non sine gravi lancea. Quid autem agas cum Georgio et equite et cataphracto, hasta simul et gladio formidabili ? Nee inermis est Antonius ; habet secum sacrum ignem. Sunt item et caeteris sua vel arma, vel mala, quae, quibus volunt, immittunt. Me vero quan- tumvis inermem, non tamen ejicies, nisi simul ejecto filio, quem ulnis teneo. Ab hoc non me patiar divelli : aut nunc una mecum extrudes, aut utrumque relinques, nisi mavis habere templum sine Christo. Haec te scire volui : tu cogita, quid mihi respondendum censeas. Nam mihi plane res cordi est. Ex aede nostra lapidea, calendis Augusti, anno filii mei passi 1524. Virgo lapidea mea manu subscripsi. Maria Virgo Mater Jesu. (1) Hour of death. — Many papists imagine, that if they be so fortunate as to be able to make a true confession of their sins, when at the point of death ; and if they obtain absolution from the mouth of the priest, they can have no difficulty, whatever may have been their former lives, or however sinfully they may have lived, of im- mediately entering heaven, or at least purgatory. It is distressing to think on the number of immortal souls lost, irretrievably lost for all eternity, who died trusting to this delusive hope. The pagan poet thought better on this subject than popish theologians ; for he ex- pressly says, " late repentance is seldom true," — perhaps never — " Paenitentia sera raro vera est." (2) In the litany of the Virgin, sung by immense numbers of her devotees, before the images or pictures representing her with the child Jesus in her arms, she is styled, " the queen of heaven ; the refuge of sinners ; the help of Christians ; morning star ; our only hope ; consoler of the afflicted ;" with many other epithets, all dero- gating from the honour of God, and offensive to the ears of those who have at heart the pure unadulterated worship of their Creator. (3) It has been mentioned before, that St. Peter is made the gate- keeper of heaven ; or, as a Frenchmen would call him, " le suisse." He is always painted with keys of immense size, either suspended from his girdle, or in his hands. St. Paul is also painted with a sword in his hands ; for what reason I do not know, unless it be that the sword was the instrument of his martyrdom. The apostle MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 201 Bartholomew is represented holding a knife, in some of his pictures though in others he is painted holding a cross, made in the form of the letter X, on which tradition says he suffered death. (4) and (5)— See the note (9.) (6) Guilielmus, or William, is said to have been a Roman knight, who suffered death in one of the early ages of the church. He is said to have relinquished all his secular greatness, and to have become a monk in one of the eremitical monasteries of Egypt. Being brought before the Roman governor, he was commanded to sacrifice to the idols, and upon refusing, was given over to the executioner. (7) George was tribune of the soldiers (tribunus militum) under Dioclesian. Having refused to abjure the religion of Christ, he was, by command of that persecuting emperor, given up to be devoured by wild beasts. He is made by papists the special protector of sol- diers, on account, I suppose, of his former profession. Query. Is he the same with St. George, the patron saint of England ] (8) St. Anthony, the protector of swine and swineherds, is also celebrated for the power which he is supposed to possess of curing a cutaneous disease, called after his name, " St. Anthony's j6re." He is painted in the dress of a monk, surrounded with a herd of swine, who seem to regard their keeper with marks of affection, if it be pos- sible that affection could be portrayed on the face of a — pig. Some painters have attempted it, and I have seen one painting in a church, dedicated to this saint, wherein affection was admirably expressed on the faces of these self-willed animals. He is worshipped with pecu- liar devotion among the mountains of Norcia and Ascoli, by reason of these mountains being planted with innumerable oak trees, on the acorns of which the swine are fattened. The owners, in order to call down his blessing upon their flocks, build altars to his honour, and worship him in many other extravagant, as well as unchristian ways. (9) Papists, as well as pagans of old, attribute a peculiar power to each of their saints. Thus, different offices are assigned to differ- ent saints. One is made the patron of those who labour under a sore throat, as St Blaisius ; another of women labouring in child- birth; another of children, &c. The saints are said to vindicate themselves on their lukewarm worshippers, by sending down upon them the disease which they themselves have the power of curing. St. Rocco, who is the patron of those sick of the plague, is also thought to be of service to those labouring under the venereal dis- ease, and a story is related of his having miraculously cured of this detestable malady one of his devout worshippers. John the Bap- tist is supposed to have the power of afflicting with the falling sick- ness, those with whom he has cause to be angry. Hubert can afflict his opponents with a decline, and so on of the other saints. Each trade in Rome has its own peculiar saint-protector. St. Crispin is made the patron of shoemakers ; St. Luke of painters, because tradi- 202 SIX YEARS IN THE tion relates, that he was of that trade ; and there is shown in the church of Santa Maria Maggiore at Rome, a picture of the Madonna, painted by him, which is said to have performed many miracles. Though we learn from the apostolical epistles that he was a physi- cian, yet greater belief is given to the vague tradition of his having been a painter, and therefore he is made a pattern of painters, and not of physicians — though, indeed, the latter have generally too much good sense to claim his protection for their profession, or to be angry of his not being dubbed their patron. Mary Magdalen is the protector of harlots, and Cecilia of singers and musicians — and in fine, every trade, every profession, every malady, and every occur- rence of life, have each and every one of them their own particular saint and protector, who is worshipped by those interested, with greater devotion than they ever worship the one and true God. The reader will easily discern, from what has been said on this sub- ject, the great affinity there is between popery and paganism. If the pagans had their Mercury, their Mars, their Apollo, their Juno, and their Venus, the papists have their Francis, their George, their Christopher, their Peter, their Cecilia, their Mary Magdalen, and, to govern all, they have their queen of heaven — their Madonna. But I fear the reader is long since tired by the repetition of such trash, and no wonder, for indeed I have carried the subject farther than the limits of a note would warrant. CHAPTER XXIII. Continuation of remarks upon image-worship — Popish unity — Ma- donna delta lettcra at Messina — The Virgin Mary a linguist — Copy of the Virgin's letter to the Messinians — Translation of the foregoing — Spain, and its idolatries — Spanish Jesuits — Spanish form of salutations — Portugal — Don Miguel favoured by the priests —A miracle wrought in confirmation of his authority — The Virgin delivered of a boy twelve years old— Effect of the discovery on Don Miguel's government — Concluding remarks upon image-worship. There are other celebrated Madonnas scattered through the different churches of Italy ; each one of which has its own particular history, and its own miracles attached to it ; for popory is certainly one in more senses than its advocates imagine, when they take unity as an argument in favour of its beinp- the true church of Christ. It is one also in its system of imposture. The same arts are made MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 203 use of, and the same lies fabricated for its support, in the capital of Spain, as in the capital of Italy ; in the city of the false prophet, as in the country of Confucius ; there being subjects of the pope both in the one and the other, as we learn from the relation of travellers, and as is evi- dent from students of these countries being educated at the college of the Propaganda in Rome. Miracles then, and other lying wonders, are fabricated on the spot by the acting ministers of popery, in every country where it exists ; and for this reason, the idolizing of the Madonna being an essential article of that church, her images are all supplied with stories and miracles by the priests of the country where such images are worshipped ; differing very little, if any at all, (for the imagination of an inventor of falsehoods is with time exhausted,) from the miracles attributed to images of the same, worshipped in very distant parts of the world. I shall relate a story of one more Italian Madonna, venerated in the cathedral church of Messina in Sicily, and then pass on to a view of image- worship, as practised in other parts of Europe. As Naples has its Januarius to protect it from the burning lava of Vesuvius ; so also has Messina its Ma- donna to protect it from the like evil threatened to it from its vicinity to Mongibello, or Mount Etna. The Ma- donna of the Messinians — called also "la Madonna della lettera" — if we believe the history of it, as preserved in the archives of the cathedral of Messina, was sent down from heaven, and placed on the altar where it now stands, by the hands of angels ; for the especial protection of the inhabitants. The Virgin was well pleased with the No- venas, Triduos, fyc* performed in honour of her, and to manifest this pleasure to her faithful people, she thought it advisable (if we can use such a word, when speaking of a goddess) to send them her image manufactured in heaven, in token of it— -just as a young woman makes a present of her portrait to her lover, in token of her love. * Novena and tridua. By such terms are meant certain days set apart for the more particular worship of the gods of popery. The former is a feast of nine days' continuance, the latter of three. 204 SIX YEARS IN THE The image was accompanied by a letter addressed to the bishop, clergy, and laity of the diocess of Messina, wherein she assures them of her perpetual protection and favour, in reward of their devotion toward her, and encourages them to continue in rendering her the honours due to her, as the " mother of Christ" " gate of heaven" and " consoler of the afflicted:" assuring them at the same time, that such honours paid to her were most pleasing to her son, Jesus ; and not in the least displeasing to him, as modern heretics, jealous of her glory, would insinuate. This epistle is written in Latin,* and enclosed in a silver case, whence it is never taken out but to satisfy the curiosity of some dignitary of the church ; or of those who are able to bribe the keeper for a more close inspec- tion of it. I have myself had the honour of kissing the case, and of humbly repeating an "Jive Maria" before the sacred scrap of paper. With much difficulty I obtained a copy of it, which I have since lost ; but having read it so often, I feel confident that I retain in mind the form and subject — if not the very words. To the best of my recollection, it runs as follows. " Maria Virgo, mundi Redemptoris mater, Episcopo, clero, caeterisque fidelibus inclytae civitatis Messanensis salutem et benedictionem a se, suoque filio impertit. " Quod meo cultui consulere in mentem vobis ventum est, magnum favorem apud me propter hoc inveniisti, scitote. Jampridem situm periculis plenum vestrae civi- tatis ob ejus nimiam at Etnaeum ignem propinquitatem, haud sine dolore vidi, eaque de re non raro verba habui cum filio meo ; sed hactenus ille propter rarum cultum mihi a vobis praestitum iratus, meam intercessionem au- dire noluit — Nunc autern, vobis resipiscentibus, et cultum * It is surprising how learned a lady the Madonna is, for she un- derstands nearly all ancient languages, as may be seen from the num- ber of her epistles written to the different Latin, Greek, and Armenian churches ; all written in the ancient language of the people, to which they are directed ; for she seems, either not to understand, or at least to think beneath her notice, all modern languages, as none of her letters are found written in Italian, or in modern Armenian or modern Greek. MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 205 mei feliciter inchoantibus, mei juris benigne fecit, ut ves- trum vestraeque civitatis aeterna protectrix essem ; vobis veruntamen magno opere cavendum est, ni hujus erga vos boni animi pcenitere causam mihi dederitis. Mihi vehementer placent orationes et festa in meo honore in- dicta ; et si in his rebus fideliter perseveraveritis, et hae- reses nunc temporis per vestrum orbem grassantes, quibus cultus mihi, caeteroque sanctorum sanctarumque coetui debitus maxime periclitatur, summa vi obviam vosmetip- sos praebueritis, mea perpetua protectione fruemini. In signo hujus pacti rati, imaginem mei a manibus caelesti- bus fusam vobis e caelo dimitto ; et si earn digno honore tenueritis, signum erit mihi obedientiae vestrae, et fidei. Valete. Dabam ex caelo, me sedente juxta thronum Filii mei, anno ab ejusdem incarnatione millesimo, quingente- simo trigesimo quarto, mense autem Decembris." Mary, Virgin and mother of the Redeemer of the world, to the bishop, clergy, and the other faithful of Messina, health and blessing from herself and her Son. Because ye have taken measures for establishing the worship of me ; know, that ye have thereby found great favour in my sight. Long since I observed, not without pain, the situation of your city, too much exposed to danger from its contiguity to the fires of Etna, and have frequently spoken to my Son on that subject ; but he being angry on account of the neglect of my worship, which ye have been guilty of, showed himself unwilling to attend to my intercession. Now, however, that ye have grown wiser, and have happily begun to worship me, I have obtained from him the faculty of being your eternal pro- tectress ; but I earnestly advise you, at the same time, to be careful that ye give me no eause of repenting of this my kindness. The prayers and festivals instituted in my honour are exceedingly pleasing to me, and if ye faith- fully persevere in observing them, and in opposing with all your might the heresy which at this time is spread- ing through every part of your globe, by which both my worship, and that of the other saints and saintesses, is endangered ; ye will enjoy my everlasting protection. In 19 206 SIX YEARS IN THE sign of the ratification of this agreement, I send you down from heaven the image of myself, cast* by celestial hands, and if ye hold it in that honour which it claims as a re- presentation of me, ye will thereby convince me of your obedience and faith. Farewell. Dated in Heaven, while sitting near the throne of my Son, in the 1534th year from his incarnation. Mary Virgin. Then follows the signature and seal of the bishop who governed the church of Messina at that period, in attestation of the genuineness of this curious epistle ; and after his name follow those of his vicar-general, secretary, and of six canons of the cathedral church. Hence may be learned the degree of credibility to which popish priests and bishops are entitled. Not in Italy only has the worship of the Virgin super- seded the worship of the one and true God, but in other parts of Europe also, especially in Spain and Portugal, and indeed in every place where the contiguity to evan- gelical Christians do not make the favourers of idolatry blush. The contiguity with Protestants is very probably the reason that this article of the popish creed is so little practised upon in the Roman Catholic cantons of Swit- zerland ; for popery approaches nearer to Christianity in the latter country, than I have seen it in any other part of Europe. In Spain the worship of the Virgin with all its accompanying enormities flourishes, or at least did flourish while under the tyranny of the petticoat- embroiderer,! the late King Ferdinand. Indeed the * It would appear from this that the image is made of brass, or some other fusible metal, though it did not appear so to me when I saw it. I thought that it was of wood, but I saw the face alone, which is paint- ed, the rest of the body being clothed — of course then I was deceived, for it is to be presumed that the Virgin Mary knew better than I possibly could know, of what this image, which she ordered herself, and which she seems to take such trouble about, is composed. ■j- It is said that the late King of Spain, when obliged to flee from Madrid on the approach of Joseph Bonaparte and the French army, diverted himself at Seville in the kingly employment of em- broidering his wife's petticoats. He also embroidered with his own royal hands a complete suit for the Madonna, with which she is clad on her principal festivals. He would have made a good man- milliner. MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 207 Spanish monarchy was as much upheld by the tongues and preaching of the monks and priests, who dissemi- nated the slavish doctrines of popery, (for popery, re- garded even in a political light, is essentially a slave making religion,) as by the bayonets and cannons of the Escurial. Spain was formerly more addicted to super- stition than even Rome herself. She had her inquisition, and her inquisitors, her monks, and her friars, her nuns, and — in fine she had all the paraphernalia of the most abominable irreligion. Her missionaries were the active agents for disseminating the anti-christian doctrines of popery, and helped to brutalize more, perhaps, than any other nation in the world, the people who were so unfor- tunate as to fall under their sway. The Spanish Jesuits were certainly the most wily of that wily body. Igna- tius Loyola himself was a Spaniard, and the order which he instituted is well known to the world, for the injury which morality and Christianity suffered through its malign influence. Its treachery and deceit was too gross even for Rome itself, and therefore, the head of the Romish church, to avoid greater evils, and to appease the European sovereigns, strongly crying out to a man for its suppression, was obliged to take away this rock of offence from the eyes of the Christian world. Un- willingly, indeed, did Ganganelli (Clement XIV.) sup- press the order, for he well knew that he exposed his own life to the attacks and machinations of the Jesuits. His death, six months after the promulgation of the bull for their suppression, fully proved, that the pope's fears were not without grounds ; for it is related that he met his death by a slow poison, administered to him by the emissaries of the Jesuits, or by one of that order. Image-worship and Madonna-worship was carried to more than pagan excess in Spain, through Jesuitical influence. The common salutations of the people fully proved that they thought more of the Mo- ther than of the Son, and that they could more justly be called Virginites than Christians. " Jive Maria purisima, (Hail Mary, most pure,) answered by "Sin pecado concebida," (Conceived without sin,) was the 208 SIX TEARS IN THE most frequent form of salutation ; the more Christian one of "Va usted con Dios" (Go with God,) being ex- ploded by common consent, until within a few years back. The churches were adorned with costly images and pic- tures of this goddess, and divine honours paid to them and to her relics. In fine, an evangelical Christian, while travelling in this country, could hardly bring him- self to think that it had ever been favoured with the light of the gospel ; so much is it given up to the detestable practices of idolatry. After the suppression of the Je- suits and destruction of the inquisition, Spain apparently threw off some of the abominations of popery, though she still retains enough of them to make her be distin- guished among the other nations of Europe, as a country having the mark of " the beast" stamped on its forehead -—not indelibly, it is hoped — and the seat of bigotry, tyranny, and superstition. What has been said of Spain, can also be said with equal justice when applied to Portugal. The latter country was not without its own share of popish corrup- tions ; indeed, popery reigned there in as much vigour as in any other part of Europe. Madonnanism, or the idolatry of the Virgin, was and perhaps is still practised there in all its revolting forms. It was renewed with fresh vigour in the late contest for the crown, between Don Miguel and his brother Don Pedro. The former, in order to conciliate the minds of the clergy, and through them, of the people, to his usurped authority, thought it advisable to favour every kind of superstition, and none more so than the worship of the Madonna. The priests, in return, to repay him for his kindness toward them- selves, and to excite the popular feelings in his favour, lost no opportunity of preaching the justice of his cause, of praising him for his attention to religious ceremonies, and of holding him forth as a most holy personage, and as one well worthy of governing the kingdom. They represented, on the other hand, his rival Don Pedro as a freemason ; as one who would subvert the religion of the country, and who, if he got possession of the crown, MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 209 would call down, by his impiety, the curse of God and his saints upon their devoted heads. A most curious and laughable circumstance happened in the course of this contest at one of the Madonna churches in Lisbon. There was worshipped in one of these churches an image of the Virgin, which was held in the greatest repute by the inhabitants, in consequence of the numerous miracles said to be performed by it in former times. The priests thought, that making this image speak in favour of their patron, Don Miguel, would be an irrefutable argument with the people for his pretensions. With this intention a novena was ordered in honour of the image, and the church splendidly deco- rated for its celebration. The people assembled in crowds from all parts of the city to pay their devoirs to the Virgin, and to hear the panegyric preached in her honour. The preacher, after enumerating the many be- nefits, temporal and spiritual, which the people derived from their devotion to the queen of heaven, and after relating the many miracles performed by the image then and there worshipped ; turning toward the image itself, and casting himself on his knees before it, (in which idolatrous act he was imitated by his audience,) he addressed to it a fervent prayer, for the good of the church, and implored it to manifest by a miracle, whethei she was well pleased that Don Miguel should reign over the kingdom of Portugal. The image, mirabile dictu ! at the conclusion of this fervid appeal, bowed its head in sign of assent three times in succession, before the eyes of the assembled multitude, all of which, with. one voice, simultaneously cried out, "A miracle ! a mi- racle! long live Miguel I. the chosen of the Virgin, and the beloved of Heaven." This miracle was repeat ed frequently on the following days of the festival, and in presence of a still greater concourse, attracted by its fame, which spread in an incredibly short time, not only through Lisbon, but through the greater part of Portugal It was even repeated by the Miguelite officers to their soldiers at the head of the ranks, and had, as it was in- tended, the effect of exciting their zeal in the cause of 19* 210 SIX YEARS IN THE the petty tyrant — as Miguel proved himself to be for the comparatively short time that he was in possession of the usurped throne. The last day but one, however, of its acting was des- tined to open the eyes of the people, and to give them an idea of what priestcraft is capable, in order to arrive at its ends. At the close of the sermon, and when the preacher turned, as usual, to apostrophise the image, and to implore it to signify its pleasure and assent to Miguel's government by moving the head, as it had done the seven preceding days, since the commencement of the novena, the image retained its inanimate position, to the great disappointment of the people, whose expectations were so highly wound up, and to the consternation of the priests who were privy to the cheat. The request was repeated with some additional flowers of rhetoric from the preacher and the most stunning vociferations from the people ; but all in vain ; the image neither moved its head, nor changed its position. At length, on the preacher's repeating the request the third time, and hint- ing that the Virgin was angry on account of the presence of some freemasons, who mingled through curiosity among the crowd of worshippers, a voice was heard issu- ing from the inside of the image and complainingly cry- ing out, " It is not my fault that the Virgin does not move her head, for I have pulled the cord till it broke, and what can I do more ?" The voice was distinctly heard by every one ; but the speaker was invisible. At last, one of those present more courageous than the rest, attempted to approach the image, but was repulsed repeatedly by the priests, who well knew the consequence of the dis- covery ; but being seconded by some others equally desirous of unravelling the mystery, he at length suc- ceeded in coming close to it, and on removing the folds of the garments, with which such like images are decked out, he found an opening in the side, large enough for the admittance of a grown boy, whom he pulled out from the viscera of the Virgin, and who was immediately re- cognised as the nephew of the bishop, placed there by his uncle ; for what purpose, it does not require an MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 211 extraordinary degree of acuteness to guess. The whole secret was now explained ; the people met the discovery with the ridicule it so well merited, and little was want- ing that they did not massacre on the spot the impostors who got up the cheat. These thought it their best plan to consult for their own safety by flight, which they im- mediately made good through the doors of the sacristy, amid the hisses and curses of the infuriated populace. Miguel's cause lost many a good and powerful advocate by the failure of this imposture, and he was obliged to again have recourse to his usual remedies — the sword and dagger — to keep the inhabitants in any degree of subjection to his authority. The poor Madonna, or rather her image, was now disgraced for ever, and removed in a short time from the church altogether. Indeed, it seems surprising that the enraged populace did not tear it asunder, as the vile instrument of a wily priesthood for propagating their monstrous doctrines and extending the reign of darkness. It may, very probably, make its ap- pearance again on the theatre of priestcraft, in the cha- racter of some miracle-working Madonna sent down from heaven, if not used for fire-wood before a favourable opportunity presents of bringing it forward for that pur- pose ; or it may be baptized with the name of some minor saintess, into which a new coat of paint could easily transform it ; or, in fine, it may be sold by the sacristan to some farmer, to be used by him for a Priapus to frighten the birds from his newly sown corn-fields. It is reasonable to suppose, that ninety-nine out of a hundred — yes, and the hundredth too — of popish miracles, if examined as the foregoing has been, would be found nothing else than the machinations of the priests en- deavouring to establish some favourite doctrine, or to fyring about something which may be profitable to them- selves as individuals, or to the whole church in general which they swear to support, per fas et nefas — to carry through thick and thin, I have been thus diffuse on the subject of images and image-worship, because it is a doctrine fondly adhered to by the church of Rome, and cherished as one of its most 212 SIX YEARS IN THE essential and vital dogmas. The scriptural dogn.-** :i not Irish — priest, since dead, very much scandalized them. . 27 302 SIX YEARS IN THE An English Protestant of the name of Muller, long time a resident in Malta, where he was employed in the civil government, had from his infancy lived without God, and had nothing of the Protestant about him, but the name, which he acquired from his parents being of that denomination. Being seized with a lingering illness, the bed of sickness brought forcibly to his mind his ill- spent life, and his neglect of God and religion, while in the enjoyment of health. Feeling his end fast approach- ing, he sent for the Protestant chaplain of the forces, a Mr. Mesurier, and begged him to pray with him, and to lay open the hopes that a dying sinner can lay hold on for obtaining happiness in the ne\t world. Mr. Mesurier found the unfortunate man totally ignorant of the first principles of Christianity, and had to explain to him, as to an infant, every thing relating to the Christian religion ; such- as the love of God to mankind, who sent down his only begotten Son, to be offered up as a sacrifice to his offended majesty for their sins, and other things of this kind. He had never read the Bible in his life, and ignorance made him doubt of all religions. With some difficulty, and great perseverance, (for his sickness was a long one, of more than three months' continuance,) Mesurier brought him to understand and believe in some of the most essential articles of revelation, and had him fully prepared and reconciled to depart from this world, trusting and relying on the merits of his Redeemer for salvation. In this state of mind, the man expired in the presence of Mr. Mesurier. The deceased had a sister living with him, who took care of his household concerns, (for he was never married,) one that was as ignorant as himself of vital religion. This, her ignorance, made her an easy prey to the Maltese priests ; and she had, some time before her brother's illness, and without his know- ledge, renounced the errors of Protestantism, as the doctrines of the Bible are called by papists, in the hands of Father Butler. During her brother's illness, she often attempted to have his permission to bring that priest to see him ; but he always refused ; being unwilling to have his last MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 303 moments disturbed by the presence of one, who, he well knew, putting religion out of the question, showed no very good example to his followers. The breath how- ever had no sooner left his body, and the Protestant clergyman departed, than away she runs for Father But- ler, as it had already been agreed upon between them. The latter arrives at the dead man's late residence out of breath with haste, and pulling out his oil-horn, he sets about greasing the inanimate corpse, and going through the other ceremonies practised at the administration of extreme unction. This being finished, the sister then began to wail, and externate her grief for her brother's death in a thousand ridiculous ways, chiefly for the sake of attracting the notice of the neighbours, who were yet ignorant of his demise. These assembled to condole with the bereaved sister, and finding Father Butler in the house, and the body of the deceased still wet from the oil, with which it was besmeared, they immediately gave out, that Muller had died a Roman Catholic through the pious exertions of Father Butler, whose fame for having drawn his soul from the jaws of hell, to which the Maltese charitably consign all who die Protestants, resounded in the mouths of all. The dead body was borne by the people in triumph to the nearest church, and placed on a bier, designed for that purpose in the middle of the aisle, where it was surrounded by wax- candles, while masses were celebrated for the repose of the soul, which formerly resided in it. This was a day of triumph to the priests of Malta. They little cared about the truth of the conversion, or the sanctity of the subject of it : all they wanted was the name, and that they acquired by the arts already related. The Protestant chaplain, who knew how affairs stood, and who saw the man expire in his own presence, told his friends and those who would listen to him, the whole truth ; but it would be no easy matter to make the Mal- tese think themselves deceived, or make them aware of the cheat practised on their credulity. Conscious of having done his duty, and the press being restricted by the policy of the government, Mesurier was obliged to 304 SIX YEARS IN THE let the thing drop, and thus pass over in silence as great a violation of truth and honesty as ever shone forth in the annals of popish fiction. The occurrence was published in some of the English papers, and sent out to Malta ; but the Maltese loved to be deceived, and they, to this day, believe in the possibility of a Protestant be- coming reconciled to popery, even after death ; for such must be the view, the worthy actor in the affair, Butler, had taken of it, in order to reconcile to his conscience the sanctioning of such a falsehood ; if indeed the man be troubled with any such thing as a conscience. This, I believe, was Father Butler's first attempt at making converts. I shall reldle another, and then be done with him. An English woman, who was engaged as a servant in an American merchant's house at Smyrna, Asia Minor, related the following story of her conversion to popery by the instrumentality of our Irish hero, Father Butler. The 94th regiment of infantry passing through Gosport, prior to its embarkation for -Gibraltar, she unfortunately became acquainted with an Irish sergeant of that regi- ment in this, her native town ; and, contrary to the advice of her parents and friends, was married to him. His first care, after marriage, was to endeavour to convert her, his wife, from her own religion to popery. This he at first attempted by fair means and gentleness; but finding these of no avail, he had recourse to violent measures and even stripes. On the regiment's being ordered to Gibraltar, he immediately brought her under the notice of a Spanish priest, who acts as chaplain to the British Roman Catho- lic soldiers of that garrison. The poor woman was a long time pestered with this man's arguments. The only thing she had to plead in excuse for not being immedi- ately converted, and in order to deprecate the anger of her husband, was her being unable to understand his barba- rous English. This plea served her but little, for her husband's ill treatment grew worse daily at her obstinacy, as he was pleased to call her attachment to the religion of her childhood : indeed the poor creature, having been blessed with a religious education, and being able to ren- MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 305 der an account of the hope in her, had no inclination whatever to change it for a religion she justly thought erroneous. After the regiment's removal to Malta, she came into the fangs of our hero, Father Butler, and even then, though she could not plead in excuse the not under- standing his language, (though indeed his English is not the most Johnsonian, nor his pronunciation quite in accordance with the rules laid down by Walker,) yet she persisted in adhering to the religion of the Bible. The father's patience was worn out in catechising her, and her husband's in beating her, before she consented to deny her religion ; and it is remarkable, that her husband grew more cruel and more morose toward her since her removal to Malta, which she attributed to the fatherly advice of Father Butler. The latter one day told her in English plain enough, and which she could not misunder- stand, " that unless she made up her mind to embrace the Roman Catholic religion by a certain time," (fixing one or two weeks from the time of his speaking,) " that she may give up all hopes of ever living in peace with her husband." The poor woman thus combated on all sides, and having no one to recur to, for she feared her hus- band's anger, if she went to a Protestant clergyman, at last yielded, and added one more to the number of Butler's converts. She publicly renounced Protestantism at the Jesuit's church, which is now given up entirely to the use of the English soldiers, amid the applauses and clamours of the bigoted popish soldiers and others, who were pre- sent on the occasion. She nearly fainted at the foot of the altar, whither she went to receive the Eucharist, after pronouncing the words of renunciation ; her conscience probably smiting her for acting contrary to its dictates. All things considered, she showed herself a heroine, and deserved a better fate than to be joined to a bigoted papist. The wonder is that she held out so long, rather than that she yielded in the end. Her husband not long after her pseudo-conversion, being reduced to the ranks for some misdemeanor, gave himself up to drunkenness and de- bauchery, as much as a man under military discipline could, and, in the end fell a victim to the climate and his 27* 306 SIX YEARS IN THE own intemperance. She was after this thrown on the world in a strange country, but God opened a way for her. She was hired by the American gentleman, spoken of above, who was in Malta on business, in whose house at Smyrna she now lives, and to whom she related the story of her forced conversion, as the reader has just heard it. She has returned to her former creed, and gives evident signs of being a pious and faithful Christian. From the two foregoing examples, the reader may learn, of what kind popish conversions are in general, and what these are in particular, caused by the operations of the Hi- berno-Maltese hero. If the circumstances attending the conversions of the others, whom he has placed on his list of proselytes, were examined, it is probable, nay, it is certain, that they would be found on a par with the specimens we have given : each and every one of them the effect either of imposition, deception, force, or ignorance. This illiterate monk had also the impudence to enter into a doctrinal controversy with a Protestant missionary at Malta, of the name of Wilson — the same with him that discovered, and made public, the knavery of Doctor Naudi, as already related. The subject chosen was the " rule of faith," — a subject he knows as much about as his sanctified founder Dominick did of pure Christianity. He had, nevertheless, the presumption to open the con- troversy by a letter of five or six pages, addressed to Mr. Wilson, wherein he endeavoured to bring forward in his own uncoutli language the hackneyed arguments of popish theologians in favour of the Romanist's rule of faith — the church, the pope, and tradition, versus the Protes- tant's — the Bible alone. These arguments, so often con- futed, he endeavoured to revive and bring forward as his own, for the purpose of distinguishing himself among his fellow priests. Though Mr.Wilson saw from the be- ginning into his real motives, and judged him immediate- ly an adversary of little capability, and unable, on account of his natural stupidity and neglected education, to main- tain by any original arguments the ground he had taken ; yet hoping that it might be the means of opening the eyes of some benighted follower of popery, he did not MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 307 disdain the weakness of his adversary, or refuse to accept his challenge. In answer to his interpolations of old schoolmen, he published a very neat little book, entitled " The Knights of the Hermitage, or an account of a fear- ful and bloody engagement between Sir Dominick Ritual and Sir Paul Text-book." This book is written in a serio-comic style : by the two knights are meant the popish ritual, under the name of Sir Dominick Ritual ; and the Bible, under that of Sir Paul Text-book. Mr. Wilson puts arguments in the mouth of his adversary, which no one that ever knew Padre Butler would suppose him guilty of using, so far are they above his understanding ; yet his adversary, to make up for what he wants in talents, generously supplies him with the arguments which he probably would use, if he were a man of learn- ing ; and then refutes them — in other words, he supplies him with weapons, and then fights him. And what return did he make so generous an enemy ? Did he answer him ? He did, but in a summary way, for he attempted to summon him to the court! He wanted to construe into a libel some expression, which Wilson used in the course of argument, and was determined to make it the subject of a prosecution. The book was printed in England, and though addressed to Butler, was designed for the use of all who might take a fancy to read it. Explaining in a note a certain passage, wherein mention is made of Butler's name, and which would appear ob- scure to the general reader, unacquainted with the cause of the controversy, the author says, " that he (Butler) is now vegetating among the self-denying Dominicans of Malta, and had recently stolen on the last moments of a dying Protestant (Muller, whose history has been given above, I suppose, he means) to try to have the honour of converting him to popery." The valorous knight, Sir Dominick, being unable to face his gallant adversary in single combat, and on equal terms, attempted to call to his assistance his auxiliaries, the lawyers and bailiffs of Malta, in order to be revenged for his signal defeat : not considering at the same time, that such, a step would dishonour him in the eyes of all honest knights, because 308 SIX YEARS IN THE contrary to the established laws of single combat. I dare say, his signal defeat has taught him to consider well the strength of his adversaries, prior to engaging them, and, however his presumption may excite him to enter the lists against those superior to him in prowess, leaving out of the question the justice of their cause, to hide himself in future under the protecting wings of his own nothingness. But I have taken up more time in speaking of this curious compound of ignorance and presumption than I at first intended, not thinking the man worth the trouble of many remarks. It is not, however, he I intended to portray, but I have taken his person, and the rank he holds of chaplain to Irish soldiers in Malta, as a criterion, by which to judge of the general conduct and endowments of popish priests, wherever they are to be found ; of their roguery, their impositions, their manner of making con- verts ; in fine, of the fruits of the religion, of which they are the ministers, and which fruits, were they less bitter, would be a greater subject for wonder, considering the tree on which they grew, than that they are in actual conformity with the nature of their parent-branch ; though indeed the latter is no wonder at all. CHAPTER XXX. Rev. Mr. Lowndes, Protestant missionary — Greek priests at Corfu — State of religion at Corfu — Popish clergy and archbishop — Con- versation with the popish archbishop — His attempt to wheedle me again into popery — My answer — Persecution by the popish priests, and its effect — Zante — Popish priests at Zante — Mr. Croggon, the Wesleyan missionary — Letter from Smyrna to Mr. Lowndes — The popish priests attempt to poison me — Effects of the poison — Departure from Zante — Arrival at Smyrna — Conclusion. After residing some months in Malta, I embarked on board a Maltese vessel for Corfu ; which island I reached after a pleasant voyage of ten days. I had letters of re- commendation to some of the English residents there, and through their interest, was soon in possession of a good income, derived from teaching Italian, Latin, and MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 309 English. I kept myself as much as possible separate from the priests of the island, fearing that their machina- tions and influence might be of injury to me, if they came to the knowledge of my former profession. I formed a very close friendship with a truly evangelical missionary, the Rev. Mr. Lowndes, a long time residing on the island, to which he has been the means of render- ing very great services, by establishing schools, and instructing the people in the life-giving truths of the gospel. To that pious and Christian man I am very much indebted. From him I first learned what Chris- tianity really is. Though I made no secret of my So- cinian views on religious matters, he yet endeavoured, not by persecution and annoyance — the method practised by those I met at London — but by argument, and a candid perusal of the sacred volume, to convince me of my errors ; and I must certainly have been infatuated not to be persuaded. Persuaded, however, I was not, at that time, nor for a long time afterward. Indeed, it required the hand of God, and grace from above, to accomplish so great a work. Mr. Lowndes was also of very great ser- vice to me in a temporal point of view. He obtained for me many tuitions in the Greek families, and were it not for popish persecution, which broke out as soon as ever the priests discovered (by what means I am to this day ignorant) my former pr6fession, I would have remained at Corfu all my life. I have already, in a former part of this work, given a sketch of the state of religion at Corfu. The idol Spiri- dione is the god of the island, and from him are expected all the blessings, spiritual and temporal, which its inhabit- ants pray for. The Greek priests are proverbially ignorant and illiterate ; and, consequently, bigoted in the extreme to their own superstitious form of worship. Their supine ignorance is so well known, that the Latin inha- bitants, when they wish to express a more than usual degree of that mother of devotion, say of one of their acquaintances, " Egli e piu ignorante* che un papa Greco." (He is more ignorant than a Greek priest.) The greater part of the educated Corfuotes are naturalists. They do 310 SIX YEARS IN THE not believe m Christianity under any form. Their reli- gion is that of nature, and they take no pains to hide that belief. Some of them, unable to bear the pangs of skepticism, flee for relief to the only place it can be found — to the Book of Life. Mr. Lowndes has pointed out to me a few of the principal inhabitants, who were really pious and scriptural Christians. These were at first infidels, and owe their conversion, next to God, to the pastoral care of that gentleman. The Latin clergy are comparatively more enlightened than the Greek. This is chiefly owing to their having received their education at Rome, or Bologna. But what they gain in knowledge, they lose in morality, for they are by many degrees inferior to the Greek clergy on this point. The greater part of the latter have wives and families. The Greek priests, who have not, are as re- markable for their scandalous and immoral lives, as the Latin priests themselves — a striking example of the effects of celibacy. There are in Corfu four popish churches, governed by an archbishop, who is nominated by the court of Rome, and paid by the Ionian government. The popish bishop who was in possession of that see in my time, held, as far as I could learn, the character of a pious and good man, that is, as far as piety and goodness can form the ingredients of a popish prelate ; of one, who must be either a fool or an impostor, in order to come up to the letter of his title. When it was discovered that I was a Roman Catholic clergyman, just escaped from monastic bondage, the archbishop immediately sent for me to his house. I thought it prudent to go to him. He inquired whether what he had heard from good authority concern- ing me was the truth? whether I had been a Capuchin friar ? I answered in the affirmative. He then told me, " that he was a long time wishing for an Irish priest to take charge of the souls (Jiis own words) of the British Roman Catholic 'soldiers, who were quartered in the island, and that if I wished to unite myself again to the holy Roman Catholic church, he would give me that chaplaincy, with a fixed salary." He then entered into a MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 311 long theological discussion, or rather lecture, (for he was the only speaker,) on the truth and infallibility of the church of Rome, on the dangers of heresy, and on the miserable death of the heresiarchs. He endeavoured to bring before me the dangerous state of my own soul, if I should be taken off by the hand of death, while living in enmity with the church, and therefore (he added logically enough) with God. To all this I turned a deaf ear. I told him plainly, ** that my escape from popery was not the effect of whim, or caprice, but of a firm conviction of the fallacy of that system of religion ; and that, though I had not embraced as yet any other form of Christian worship, I would, nevertheless, rather trust to the religion of nature for the salvation of my soul, than to the errone- ous and absurd doctrines of popery. " I even added, when he urged his arguments on the infallibility of his church, and when he endeavoured to prove from some say- ing of Augustine — to be found — the Lord knows where,* — that the Scriptures themselves were based on that in- fallibility, which I deny, "that were the Scriptures based on no better authority than that of the pope, and of his church, this night I would sleep a disciple of Voltaire." My interview with the archbishop of Corfu passed over in this way, and we separated, mutually dissatisfied with each other. I very soon, however, found the effects which his anger had upon my emoluments, and my means of subsistence. He could not openly do me any injury, or cause it to be done to me, for he knew that he was not living under popish government, and that Lord Nugent, the High Commissary of the Ionian Islands, would not permit him to touch my person. Had * A hackneyed quotation from St. Augustine, or at least, one fathered upon that saint, is in great vogue with popish disputants. "Ne quidem ipsis scripturis crederem, nisi audoritas Romanas ecclesise me ad id excitaret" (Not even the Scriptures themselves would I believe, unless the authority of the Roman church moved me thereto,) is in the mouth of every popish school-boy. I wish their teachers would teach these boys, that it is a sophism- — what the logicians call " circulus vitiosus" to prove one thing by another ; to prove the truth of the church from the Scriptures, and then tha truth of the Scriptures themselves from the church. 312 SIX YEARS IN THE 1 been in any Italian city, and expressed myself in the way related, I would not long have enjoyed the light of heaven. Being unable then, to avenge himself by per- sonal violence, he resolved to starve me into a compliance with his wishes. He excited, or rather commanded his cursed priests to denounce me from their altars and pul- pits. He himself used his influence with those families, whose children I was instructing, to withdraw them from me. In fine, I found myself, after five months' residence at Corfu, without the means of subsistence, on account of the machinations, and through the influence of the popish priests — as cursed a set of bigoted, unchristian men, as ever devoted themselves to the propagation of the soul-destroying tenets of popery ; or as ever bowed their knee to the beast — the great idol of the western churches, who " sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself as God." Finding myself fast sinking into a state of abject poverty, and unable to stem the torrent of persecution, in which the priests were endeavouring to overwhelm me, I resolved to leave Corfu, and go to Zante, where J hoped to be less exposed to popish rancour. Zante is one of the seven Ionian islands under British protection. The greater part of its inhabitants follow the Greek rite. There are, however, followers of the pope there, also — the remnant of old Venetian families, and the descendants of Maltese emigrants. There are, 1 believe about four- teen popish priests in the island. These are governed by a bishop, (whom I never saw,) who is subject to the archbishop of Corfu. Were the most infamous brothels of London and Paris to be searched, there could not be found in them fourteen ruffians to match the fourteen priests of Zante, in ruffianism, infamy, and debauchery. The priests of Corfu, nay, even those of Malta, are angels, when compared with them. Each of them publicly keeps a concubine for hi3 own individual use, besides now and then leaving her to pine alone, for the more welcome embraces of some fair penitent. Their whole time is spent in a coffee house, situated in the principal square, called " Piazza San Marco." In this coffee house they MONASTERIES OF ITALY, ETC. 313 might be seen in fours, sixes, or tens, gaming, drinking, and carousing ; not once, nor ten times, but so constantly, as to acquire for the house the name of " caffe dei preti," or the priests' coffee house. The house itself has be- come so infamous through their frequenting it, that no respectable inhabitant of the island would be seen entering it. It is therefore frequented by idlers, and loungers alone ; by those who earn a subsistence by scheming and impositions — all fit companions for these adepts in schem- ing and imposture— -the priests. The Greek priests of Zante are for the most part married men. They have a greater show of decorum in their general conduct, than the popish priests ; and some of them really are, judging at least from outward appear- ances, seriously impressed with the important duties of their calling. If there be any tincture of Christianity at all in the island, it must be looked for among some few of the Greek priests, though, to be sure, nearly stifled by the superstitions, for which the Greek as well as the popish church is remarkable. There is also a Wesleyan Me- thodist missionary, of the name of Croggon, residing in the island, but his influence is very small. Indeed, I believe he has no influence at all, for he is not well liked, being quite unfit for a missionary. At least, for the short acquaintance I had with him, I was never able to dis- cover any of the qualifications which induced the Wes- leyan Missionary Society to send him to Zante ; and not one of those who had any intimate acquaintance with him, did I ever hear speak of him, as a man worthy of being respected, or as desirous of ameliorating the moral or intellectual condition of the people. He was ignorant of every language but English. Greek, he attempted to smatter, but scarcely made himself intelligible. It may, then, naturally be expected, that the blessed doctrines of the reformation made but little progress, when taught by so very unskilful a teacher. Having consulted with my friend Mr. Lowndes, and laid open to him the state to which I was driven by the persecutions of the Corfu priests, he advised me to go to Zante, giving me at the same time a letter of introduction 28 314 SIX TEARS IN THE to Mr. Croggon, the only person he knew residing there. Zante being but a short distance from Corfu — less than twenty-four hours' sail — I arrived there the day after my departure from Corfu. What happened after my arrival, and why I left it after a very short stay, will be best learned from a letter I wrote from Smyrna to the Rev. Mr. Lowndes at Corfu. I find the copy of it among my other papers, and shall transcribe it word for word. It will show of what popery is capable now-a-days, as well as formerly, and that the diabolical principle, " the end justifies the means," is still practised in every place where popery prevails. I myself am a living example of the truth of this assertion, having barely escaped with life from the poisonous cup presented by the hand of a popish priest, as will be seen by those who take the trouble to read the following letter. Smyrna, 20th December, 1834. Rev. and dear sir, — Gratitude for the many favours received from your hands, united to an ardent wish of returning my heartfelt thanks, makes me embrace the present opportunity of writing by a ship, about to depart from this port for Malta, whence I hope this letter will find its way to you. You will surely be surprised to hear, that I am at Smyrna, and will wonder, what in- duced me to proceed there. Have patience, dear sir, and I shall tell you all, the how, the ivhen, and the where' fore. You may, perhaps, remember, indeed I am sure you do remember, that being unable to hold out any longer against the unchristian-like (though sufficiently popish- like) persecutions of the Corfu priests, I determined upon a change of place, and, by your advice, proceeded to Zante. Upon my arrival I sought Mr. Croggon, to whom you had kindly given me a letter of introduction. He endeavoured to procure me some scholars ; and, although a gentleman of very little influence in the island, (the reason of which you know yourself,) he yet suc- ceeded so far, as to place me in a way of living indepen- dently, if priestly persecutions would permit me. I had not been very long at Zante, when priestly machinations MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 315 again broke out, though not in so open, yet in a more insidious manner than at Corfu. I had determined, from my first arrival, to keep myself clear of all communication with the Roman Catholic clergy of the place, and had so far succeeded as to baffle all their attempts, though many were made, of becoming acquainted with me. Finding all their manoeuvres without success, they changed their mode of attack, and fixed upon a plan, which, for its base- ness, would do honour to any of the most renowned ministers of Satan's empire. And what do you think this plan was ? Nothing less than to deprive me of life and honour at the same time. They hired a Roman Ca- tholic non-commissioned officer, belonging to a British regiment quartered .in the island, and having first worked on his weak, superstitious mind, through the organ of confession, they persuaded him that he would do a meri- torious action, and worthy of a plenary indulgence, if he deprived me of life, or at least devised some method of driving me from Zante. They represented me, at the same time, to him, as an excommunicated person, and an apostate from " our holy mother, the church." This certainly will appear incredible to you, as it has also appeared to me, when first told of it. Though well ac- quainted with the existence of such an abominable theory in the church of Rome, I yet could hardly believe it pos- sible, that the priests, monsters as they are, would dare put it in practice in a country boasting British protection, and, therefore, unused to such abominations. Indeed, the mind can hardly conceive it possible, that human pre- judice and bigotry could go so far as to lay down as a principle of morality, that " to deprive a fellow creature of life is a meritorious act in the sight of God ;" for, how- ever popish theologians might endeavour to cover over the plain words by introducing the clause " when the good of the church requires it" &c. the theory, in itself, is abominable, and the practice of it always amounts to " murder." It would seem, that some popish teachers themselves are ashamed of it, from their denying its very existence, which they would not do, if they could, in any way, defend or excuse it. — But to return. 316 SIX TEARS IN THE The soldier, fortified with a general absolution before- hand, devised I know not what method of becoming acquainted with me. If I am not mistaken, he called at my lodgings one morning, and introduced himself by saying, that he had three children whom he wished that I should attend one hour every day, to teach them Italian. He promised me, at the same time, eight dollars a month, as a compensation. I first doubted his ability to pay so much, but farther inquiry satisfied me that he had the means, having, besides his pay as a non-commissioned officer, another salary from some government employ- ment. Thus thrown off my guard, and not having the least suspicion (and how could I ?) of any evil intended me, I frequently met with the aforesaid man. One day, in particular, he invited me to accompany him to a friend's house. I consented. He conducted me to a house, not very distant from the " cqffe dei preti," (the priests' coffee house,) and to my great astonishment, ushered me into a room, where the first thing that attracted my notice was four or five priests carousing ; some of them in a beastly state of intoxication. It was now too late to retreat. They prevailed upon me to sit down, and as an introduction to conversation, handed me a glass of — what I then thought was wine, but which I afterward discovered to my cost to be — poison, with a colouring of wine. I drank it — and in a few moments after became insensible. I recollect nothing farther of what occurred. The next morning I awoke in a burning fever, which continued without intermission for ten days. I was, as I was afterward informed, carried in a state of insensibility to my lodgings. The garrison physician, who was a friend of mine, being sent for, he immediately gave it as his opinion, that I had been poisoned. To his skill and treatment, I owe, under God, my life. It was well for me that the poison was so powerful, and that it caused immediate insensibility ; for had it been less rapid in its operations, I would have retired to bed, without any suspicion of the real cause of my sickness, and then sunk into an eternal sleep. The civil authorities of Zante wished to set on foot an MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 317 inquiry on the subject, but I begged that it might be dropped, being unwilling to render myself an object of curiosity, and fearing other attempts on my life. In about fifteen days I found myself sufficiently recovered to depart from the island — a thing I had before deter- mined upon. I passed on, accordingly, to Cephalonia, where I remained but a few days. From Cephalonia I went to Patrass, and thence to Nauplion, or Napoli di Romania. Not being able to procure employment in the latter city, and not having the wit to live without it, I re- solved to leave the civilized world altogether, and try my fortune among the Turks. A vessel departing for Smyrna, (Asia Minor,) presented an opportunity of putting ,my design in execution. I took a passage in her, and with- out any thing remarkable having occurred during the voyage, I arrived safely in this city, (Smyrna.) I am now residing in the house of the Rev. W. B. Lewis, an Irish clergyman, and missionary to the Jews of this city. He has treated me with exceedingly great kindness, and I hope, through his influence, to be shortly in a way of being useful to myself and others. This, my dear sir, is a brief narrative of what occurred since my departure from Corfu, and of the how, the why, and the ivherefore, I left Zante. A great change has also taken place in my spiritual concerns. You knew me when bordering on deism, and you had also the conside- ration to attribute such a state of mind, rather to the absurd doctrines of the church from which I had lately escaped, than to any innate, or natural depravity, peculiar to myself. You judged right. The transition from popery to Christianity is rarely, if ever, the work of a day. It requires some time to heal the wounds inflicted on the mind by popish superstitions. Now, I trust, how- ever, that, without presumption, I can say, U I have found a Saviour" I acknowledge the hand of God, even in his chastisements. Perhaps he has made use of the above sufferings, only to bring me to a closer union with himself. My reliance upon his mercy is so strong, that I would not now shrink from the whole court of Rome, with the pope at its head, if it should think proper to 28* 318 SIX YEARS IN THE begin a crusade against my insignificance. Neither pope nor popery, priest nor priestcraft, shall separate me from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. I conclude then, protesting myself Your obliged, humble servant, S. I. Mahoney* From the foregoing letter the reader will be able to judge of the difficulties into which my renunciation of popery had plunged me. He will also acquire a know- ledge of the manner in which the pope's myrmidons, the priests, treat those whose consciences oblige them to separate from their communion. Many other instances could be given, equal and even surpassing in heinousness that by which my own life was endangered ; but as this book has already reached a greater bulk than was at first intended, I shall pass them over in silence for the present. Before I conclude, however, I must say a few words, on the state of religion in general, and more especially on the state of the popish religion at Smyrna. The Greek church is that which, next to Mahometan- ism, counts the greater number of adherents at Smyrna. The Greek priests of Smyrna are generally better educat- ed, and more enlightened, than priests of the same church in the Morea, and islands of the Archipelago ; they are, however, equally superstitious, and sunk into the same indifference for the Scriptures which distinguishes the latter. There are many schools kept by priests, wherein the children are taught to read and write. The Scrip- tures are also read in some of them ; but the latter are chiefly under the direction of Protestant missionaries. The Greek clergy of Smyrna is in general a very moral body of men. The greater part of those composing it is married ; which perhaps is the reason that very few examples of public scandal — so very frequent in popish countries — are afforded by priests. The pope has also his adherents at Smyrna. There are two convents of Latin monks there : one called " il convent o Franpese," (French convent,) belonging to the respectable order of Capuchins ; the other, to the no less MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 319 respectable one of the " Zoccolonti," or wooden-shod Franciscans. In the latter, the popish missionary bishop resides. He is a Frenchman, and is possessed of as little Christianity, and as much bigotry and superstition, as distinguished his countrymen before the memorable revo- lution of '89, and which led them, in the end, to establish by law the worship of the "goddess of reason" The monks in Smyrna come up, in point of morality, with their brethren at Jerusalem ; a description of whom has been already given. Popery is indeed the same in every place. Popish practices and popish doctrines have the same demoralizing effect on the lives of the followers of popery at Rome, as at Jerusalem ; at Smyrna, as in Ire- land. The monks make use of the same arts for extort- ing money from the deluded people in one place as in the other. Monks indeed, wherever they might be found, may take for their motto, the Italian verses : Con arte, e con inganno Si vive la meta dell'anno; Con inganno, e con arte Si vive l'altra parte. By art and by deceit One half the year, we eat ; By deceit and by art We eat, the remaining part.* The monks of Smyrna are, for the most part, Italians, or Smyrniotes. I knew one of the latter, who studied at Rome, and whom I saw afterward at Smyrna. His name is " Padre Giovanni Battista," (Father John Bap- tist.) While a student at Rome, he was distinguished for nothing more than for his asinine stupidity. He has, however, since his arrival at Smyrna, acquired the name of a great preacher, and is esteemed highly by some of the people ; but more especially by his fair penitents, to some of whom he has been the cause (and I know it from good authority) of giving the title of " Mamma," a title similar * The reader will have the goodness to excuse the above abortive attempt at poetry. The gods have not made me a poet, nor do I lay any pretensions to the title of one. 320 SIX YEARS IN THE to his own of " Padre," thus proving himself a father in the double sense of the word; as a priest, and as it is received in common parlance. Indeed, I doubt much, if there be a popish priest in the world, who is not more entitled to the endearing title of " Father" than their friends give them credit for. It is now full time to bring this work to a close, for indeed I fear, that the reader is already as tired of read- ing as I myself am of relating the abominations of pope- ry, and of her soul-deceiving ministers. Let it not be supposed, that it is against the latter, as men, that this work is directed. No, it is not with a view of bringing odium on priests, as men or individuals, that these pages have been put together. It is against their doctrines, and against their practices — the necessary consequences of such doctrines. I love a priest as well as I love any other of my fellow creatures ; but then, I do not love him for his being a priest, but because he is a man. Were I to look on him only as a priest, I should be rather in- clined to hate him, as a personification of dishonesty ; for I cannot conceive it possible, that an honest man could remain a popish priest, that is, a teacher of false doctrines and deceiver of the people. There are, perhaps, some priests who are really convinced of the truth of the doc- trines they teach, and of the lawfulness of the practices which are peculiarly the church of Borne' s own ; but these, I fear, are few, very few in number. I have not, during the many years I was domesticated with the popish clergy, ever known one of them, whose talents were above mediocrity, a believer in the absurdities, which, as a priest, he was obliged to teach the people. They were, for the most part, infidels ; and those who were not infi- dels were Protestants, really and truly protesting in their own minds against the abominations of popery, with as much sincerity as the most zealous Christians have ever done. Personal safety obliged them to keep their abhorrence of popery to themselves ; but if they had the use of their own free will, they would soon throw off, as many have done, when an opportunity presented, the outside of popery, and declare themselves gospel Chris- MONASTERIES OP ITALY, ETC. 321 tians. The church of Rome, then, according to my opinion, is wholly upheld by the secular arm, in those countries where she is the established church, and by some few men of talents, who, though not believing in « her doctrines, yet defend her, because they get a sub- sistence by her. In those countries where she is not the established church, she is upheld by the ignorance of the people, the cunning of the priests, and last, not least, by the persecutions of Protestant governments. Ire- land will serve as an example^ of the latter method of supporting popery. Will any one suppose, that it was through love for the pope, or his religion, that the Irish resisted, and still resist all attempts to make them gospel Christians ? I would as soon believe that the church of Rome is the church of Christ, as believe any such thing ! The true and only support of popery in Ireland was the persecuting spirit of Protestants ; that is, of those, who, disguised under the name of Protestants, but who were really little better than d Is, came to butcher and slaughter the unfortunate Irish, for the sake of obtaining possession of their properties, or depriving them of their emoluments. The penal code, that disgrace to England, has then been of more real service to the pope and to the Irish priests, than all the bulls the former issued from the Vatican, or than all the curses the latter pronounced from their altars. "V\%en the people were oppressed, to whom could they more naturally fly for consolation than to a minister of religion ? This riveted the people's chains, and the priests' power grew stronger, according as the oppressions received from their Protestant task- masters grew more insupportable. Oppression and per- secution are then the real causes, to which the adherence of Ireland to popery must be attributed, and not, by any means, because the Irish love popery for its own sake— a thing impossible, for they do not understand it. THE END. f iOo. j -p * A «o W .0 i- ' ^ '/ ^ v* o .0 \ v p^ \V ./> Deacidified using the Bookkeeper process. Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxide Treatment Date: Jan. 2006 % / . %■ ^ \, - cV* % = . . a A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVE 111 Thomson Park Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Treatment Date: Jan. 2006 PreservationTechnologies A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVATION 111 Thomson Park Drive 111 Thomson Park Dr Cranberry Township. I (724)779-2111 .0 /-> * %. J vV '/ NT * H ^ : .#' •^ v tf .^ % , A » iV >- aV * '