, K37 \ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 01 4 107 305 9 ^ F 119 .K37 Copy i AN ANNIVERSARY DISCOURSE, DELIVERED BEFORE THE NEW-YORK HISTORICAL. SOCIETY, -DUCBHTBISB. 6, 1828. BY JAMES KENT, It Prr.iidait of the SncicfV- NEW- YORK : PUBLISHED BY G. & C. CARVILL BROADWAY. 1829. SetUhem District of J\reic-York, ss. BE IT REMEMBLHED, That on the thirtieth day of December, A. D. 1828, in the lifty- (L. S ) ''"'"^ ^®'*' "' ^^ Independence of the United Stiites "f Amorica, Jrlm vV Francis, Ohiirles King, and Jonathan M- Wainwriglit, for the New-York Hisi.ir.eal tj.rietv, of the said district, nave deposited in this olfiie 'he titie of ti Book, the right whereof the said Society claims as Proprietors, intlio words foilowiiip, to «it _ " An Anniversary Discourse, delivered before the ■>ew- York Historical Society, December Cth, 1828. By James Kent, President of the Society." In confonnity to the Act of Congress of the United States, entitled, "An Act for the encou- ragement of Learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the iiuthors and proprietors of such copies, during the time therein mentioned." vVnd also to an Act, entitled, " An Act, sup|)lenientary to an Act, entitled, An Act for the encouragement of Learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Chart.^, ard Books, to tho authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other Prints-" FRED. J. BETTS, Clerk of the Southern District of New- York. iayroii & Van Norden, Printerf- J^'eW'York Historical Society, ? December 9th, 1828. S Resolved, That the thanks of the Society be presented to the Honourable James Kent, for his able, appropriate, and highly interesting Discourse, delivered in the Hail of Colurabia College, on the 6th of December instant; and that he be requested to iurnish a copy of the same for publication. Resolved, That Doctor John W, Francis, Rev. Doctor Wainvvright, and Charles King, Esq., be a Committee to carry the foregoing resolution into effect. JOSEPH BLUNT, Recording Secretary. A DISCOURSE, Ac. GENTLEMEN OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY, It is a subject of just congratulation, that we now find this Society in a condition to pursue, with success, the patriotic design of the founders of the institution. By means of the bounty of the legislature, and the public spirit of several of the members, we are relieved from our embarrassments, and are enabled to display, to great ad- vantage, the valuable collection of books and historical documents which we possess. Our collections heretofore lay in such disorder, that few persons were aware of their intrinsic value. They have been redeemed from confusion, and made convenienth^ accessible to the scholar and the antiquary ; and can now, with great satisfaction, be presented to the view of our own citizens, and of intelligent strangers. For this improve- ment, our thanks are especially due to Mr. Delafield, the Treasurer ; and it is to his industry, taste, and zeal, that we are indebted for this new and beautiful arrangement of our historical materials. When we advert to what has been done in other states, and particularly in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, and perceive how much they have hitherto surpassed us in the extent and value of their researches, I trust we shall feel an additional stimulus to acquit ourselves of our duty, and throw back upon our own annals some of the light and lustre which emanatie from the spirit of the age. 1 As the object of the Society is to discover, collect, and preserve materials, calculated to illustrate the history of our country, it has appeared to me to be suitable to the design of this anniversary meeting, to call your attention to some reflections, arising upon a view of the domestic history of this state. If I do not greatly deceive myself, there is no portion of the history of this country, which is more in- structive, or better calculated to embellish our national cha- racter. The eastern descendants of the pilgrims are justly proud of their colonial ancestors ; and they are wisely celebrating, on all proper occasions, the memory and merits of the ori- ginal founders of their republics, in productions of great genius and of classical taste. Why should we, in this state, continue any longer comparatively heedless of our own glory, when we also can point to a body of illustrious an- nals? Our history will be found, upon examination, to be as fruitful as the records of any other people, in recitals of heroic actions, and in images of resplendent virtue. It is equally well titled to elevate the pride of ancestry, to awa- ken deep feeling, to strengthen just purpose, and enkindle generous emulation. Sucli historical reviews have a salutary influence upon the morals and manners of the times ; for they help us to detect pretended merit, to rebuke selfish ambition, to check false patriotism, and humble arrogant pretension. The discovery of the Hudson, and the settlement of our ancestors upon its borders, is a plain and familiar story, on which I shall not enlarge. Our origin is within the limits of well-attested history. This at once dissipates the en- chantments of fiction ; and we are not permitted, like the nations of ancient Europe, to deduce our hneage from super-human beings, or to clothe the sage and heroic spirits who laid the foundations of our empire, with thv exaggera- tions and lustre of poetical invention. Nor do we stand in need of the aid of such machinerv. It is a suflicient iioiiour to be able to appeal to tlio simple and severe records of truth. The Dutch discoverers and settlers of New Netherlands, were grave, temperate, firm, persevering- men, who brought with them the industry, the economy, the simplicity, ther integrity, and the bravery of their Belgic sires ; and with those virtues they also imported the lights of the Roman civil law, and the purity of the Protestant faith. To that period we are to look with chastened awe and respect, for the beginnings of our city, and the works of our primitive fathers- our ^/fca^ji patres, atque altce masnia Roitkb. It does great credit to the just and moderate views of the Dutch during their government in this colony, that though they selected and settled on some of the best bot- torn lands on the shores of the Hudson and its tributary waters, they lived upon friendly terms with the powerful confederacy of the Five x\ations of Indians, whose original dominion extended over all the lands occupied by the Dutch. They were, at times, involved in hostilities with restless clans of neighbouring Indians, but the original and paramount lords of the soil, and generally the Long Island Indians, gave them no disturbance." The reason was, that the Indian right to the soil was recognised by the Dutch, and always regarded by them, as well as by the English, their successors, with the best faith ; and they claimed no lands but such as were procured by fair purchase.* The speech of the Indian called Good Peter to the commis- sioners at Fort Schuyler, in 1788, is a strong attestation of a Smithes History of New-York, vol. i. 2s. TnmhuWs History of Connecticut, vol. i. 138-140. Collections of the New-York His- torical Society, vol. iii. S24. 357. ffood^s Sketch of the First Set- ttement on Long Island, p. £9 32. b Wood^s Sketch, p. 12.22, 23. gives the names of the several nbes from whom all the lands on Long Island, whether settled bv the Dutch or English, were purchased. this I'act. He observed, that when the white men liist came into the country, they were few and feeble, and the Five Nations numerous and powerful. The Indians were friendly to the white men, and permitted them to settle in the country, and protected them from their enemies ; and they had wonderfully increased, and become like a great tree overshadowing the whole country." The Dutch colonial annals are of a tame and pacific character, and generally dry and uninteresting. The civil officers, as well as the ministers of the Dutch churches, were well-educated men, who imbibed their religion and learning in Holland ; and in their long and sharp contro- versies with the New-England Colonies, the governors of this Colony showed themselves to be no ways inferior in their discussions to the most sagacious of the Puritans, either in talent, doctrine, or manners. Their disputes were concerning territorial jurisdiction, and particularly in re- spect to the country on Connecticut river, and they also had contentions concerning fugitives from justice, and interfe- rences witli the Indian trade. Strength and arrogance of deportment were evidently on the side of the English. Governor Keift, in his letter to the commissioners of the United Colonies of New-England, in 1646, observed, that their complaints of ill-usage were the complaints of the wolf against the lamb.* Governor Stuyvesant also ob- served, in his letter to the Dutch West India Company, in 1660, that the New-Englanders were in the ratio of ten to one, and able to deprive the Dutch of their country."^ The Dutch governors charged the English, in direct terms, with an insatiable desire of possessing their lands ; and what- ever might have been the real merits of the Dutch title to a Colleclions of the New-York Historical Society, vol. iii. 526. b Hist. Coll. Neic-York Society, vol. i. 196. c Smithes Hist, of JVeir-York, vol. i. 21. 9 lands on Connecticut river, founded on assumed prior diso covery and prior Indian purchase, it appears, at least from the diplomatic papers orf the time, that their manner of vindicating their claim, and repelling accusation, and re- monstrating against aggression, was forcible, sagacious, and temperate. Peter Stuyvesant administered the Dutch government from 1647 to the surrender of the Colony to the English, in 1664, and he held his power in difficult times, and was surrounded with perils ; but he was a man of mihtary skill, and of great firmness, judgment, and discretion." He ma- nifested his desire for peace, and showed the magnanimity of his character, in going, in proper person, in 1650, to Hartford, to meet and negotiate with the commissioners of the New-England Colonies. Though standing alone in the midst of a body of keen and well-instructed oppo- nents, he conducted himself with admirable address and firmness. The correspondence between him and the com- missioners, is embodied and preserved in the collections of this Society, and it does credit to his memory.* The com- missioners took offence at the date of his first diplomatic note, which, though written on the spot, was dated New- Netherlands. Governor Stuyvesant consented to date it at Connecticut, leaving out New-Netherlands, provided the commissioners would date theirs at Hartford, leaving out New-England, and to this they assented. Both parties managed the controversy with great discretion and good sense. When the commissioners complained of the vague- ness and harshness of some parts of his letters, Governor Stuyvesant replied, that he came there from the love of peace, and not for altercation ; and that they all knew he could not deliver himself so promptly and clearly in the English a Benson^s Historical Memoir, note iv. b Collections, vol. i. 189 — 290., taken from Hazard's Historical Collections, vol. ii. JO as 111 his own native tongue, and no advantage ought to be taken of any inaccuracy of expression. The meeting ad- journed without any decisive results ; and he afterwards, in the year 1653, sent an elaborate vindication of his rights to the New-England commissioners at Boston, which con- tained sound expositions of national law. The English had complained of the exaction of duties upon them in their trade and purchases at New-Amsterdam ; and he in his turn insisted, that every civil government had a right to make what laws it thought fit, and every person who came within a foreign jurisdiction, must expect to find, and not to bring laws with him. He resented, in proper terms of indignation, the atrocious charge of being concerned in a conspiracy with the Indians, to plunder his neighbours, and shed innocent blood ; and he said, that he reposed on the mens conscia rec% and despised the tongue of calumny. Though he sought nothing but peace and neighbourly in- tercourse, yet, if he must be driven to extremities, he had confidence that a just God would smile on and bless a righteous defence. With that wise and good man terminated the Dutch power in this Colony. The English took possession of the government in 1664, and administered it in the name, and under the authority of the Duke of York, who was the patentee. The terms of surrender of the Dutch power were exceedingly liberal. The inhabitants were made secure in their persons, pro- perty, and religion.'' Their titles to land were previously free from the appendages and services of feudal bondage.* a Smith's History of New-York, vol. i. 32. 5 This is to be inferred from the conditions which had been offered by the Burgonaasters of Amsterdam, in 1656, to the settlers in New- Netherlands, one of which was, that every farmer should have a free, fast, and durable property in his lands. — New-York Historical Col- lections, vol. i. 291. 11 The conquest of the Colony proved to be a very fortunate event to the Dutch. They were reheved from perilous controversies with their eastern neighbours, and they be- came entitled to the privileges of English subjects. In a fevi^ years they participated in the blessings of a repre- sentative government, and they exchanged their Roman jurisprudence for the freer spirit, the better security, and more efficient energy of the English common law. The Dutch and English inhabitants became thoroughly united and formed but one indivisible people. The Dutch race in this Colony kept at least equal pace with their English brethren, in every estimable qualification of good citizens. Through all the subsequent periods of our eventful story, down to the present day, they have furnished their full pro- portion of competent men. This they have done in every variety of situation in which our country was placed, whe- ther in peace or in war ; and whatever was the duty in which they were engaged, whether in the civil or military, political or professional departments." Within twenty years from the conquest of the Colony, a free government, upon the plan of the English constitu- tion, was given to it, consisting of a Governor and Legisla- tive Council, appointed by the Crown, and a House of As- sembly, chosen by the people.* The Assembly was com- a It is worthy of notice, that the only two regiments of infantry from this state, in the line of the army of the United States, at the close of the Ameiicaii war, were coni'manded by Dutchmen I al- lude to the regiments commanded by Col. Van Cortlandt and Col. Van Schaick. And 1 hope I may be permitted to add, without meaning any invidious comparisons, that we have now livii>g in this state, in advanced life, thiee lawyers of Dutch descent, who are not surpassed any where in acuteness of mind, in sound law learning, and in moral worth. The reader will readily perceive that I have in my eye Egbert Benson, Peter Van Schaack, and Abraham Van Vechten. h Smith's History, vol. i. 4f5. 58. 12 posed, 111 the lirst instance, of seventeen members onlyy and it was never enlarged, even down to the period of the American war, beyond the number of twenty-seven. The members, during the earher periods of our colony history, were elected for an indefinite period ; and new elections seemed to have been held only upon the dissolution of the legislature by the act of the governor. After long struggles for triennial elections, the assembly finally succeeded in 1743, to have the assembly made septennial by law. But we should be greatly mistaken if we were to conclude that so small a body of representatives, and chosen for such indefinite or protracted periods, was unable to withstand the influence of the executive branch of the government. The house, almost as soon as it was organized, began to feel its strength, and to display its independent genius. Through the whole period of our colonial history, the gene- ral assembly rarely ceased to sustain its rights, and assert its dignity with becoming spirit, against the whole weight and influence of the delegated powers of royalty. This character of the house, was a consequence naturally flow- ing from the healthy and vigorous principle of popular elec- tion, which, like the touch by Antteus of his mother Earth, in his struggles with Hercules, always communicated fresh strength and courage to renew the contest. The house of assembly, from the very beginning of it, exercised its discretion as to the grant of supplies for the support of government, both in respect to the extent and the duration of the grants. The governors, however, con- stantly complained, and insisted upon a permanent provi- sion for the oflicers of government, and they interposed royal instructions, and sharp remonstrances, for that pur- pose. Governor Fletcher, in 1695, first began the struggle with the assembly upon that point, and the contest was continued down to the era of our revolution ; but the as- sembly retained the control of their funds with inflexible firmnesp. As the governor and council were appointed by tlie crown, and held their offices at Us pieiisure, and as the judges were appointed by the governor and held at his pleasure, the colonial assembly had good reason to be te- nacious of reserving to themselves some check upon the executive and judicial departments, by means of their sup- port. In 1708 the house of assembly declared that it was the unquestionable right of every freeman in the colony to have a perfect and entire property in his goods and estate ; and that the imposing and levying of any moneys upon the sub- jects of the colony, under any pretence or colour what- soever, without their consent, in general assembly, was a grievance, and a violation of right. They further declared that the king could not erect a court of equity in the colo- ny -without the consent of the legislature. This last resolu- tion was again and again adopted, between 1702 and 1735, in despite of the influence and menaces of the royal repre- sentative." In 1749, the claim upon the assembly to pass a permanent Supply bill, was renewed in the most imperi- ous and offensive manner. The governor told the assem- bly he had the king's instructions for a law rendering the provision for the support of government permanent ; and the house calmly replied, that they would never recede from the method of an annual support. The governor then went so far as to deny their authority to act, except by the royal commissions and instructions, alterable at the king's plea- sure, and subject to his limitations ; and that there was a power able to punish them, and would punish them, if they provoked it by their misbehaviour. He proceeded to such extremities that the assembly, without swerving in the least from their determined purpose, declared his conduct to be arbitral}', illegal, and a violation of their privileges.* It would be diflicult to find in any of the legislative re- a Colony Journals, vol. i. 253. b Smith's Hist, of JSfew- York, vol. ii. lOtJ — 1 10. Colony Journals, vol. ii. 244 — 271. 14 cuuls ol tins country, a clearer sense of right, or a better spirit to defend it. There were also considerations arising from the peculiarity of their local condition, which serve greatly to elevate the character of our colonial ancestors. Whenever war existed between Great Britain and France, the province of New- York was the principal theatre of co- lonial contest. It became the Flanders of America, and it had to sustain, from time to time, the scourge and fury of savage and Canadian devastation. We need only cast an eye upon our geographical position, and read the affecting details of the formidable expeditions, and the frightful in- cursions which laid waste our northern and western fron- tiers, between 1G90, and the conquest of Canada, in 1760, to be deeply impressed with a sense of the difficulties which this colony had to encounter, and of the fortitude and per- severance with which they were overcome. The leading men, who swayed the house of assembly, or directed the popular voice, never wanted valour and virtue adequate to the crisis. But I hasten to cast a rapid glance over the great events in our domestic history, subsequent to the peace of 1763. The colony took an early and distinguished stand against the claims of the British parliament, to raise a revenue from their American colonies without their consent. If she was not in advance, New- York was at least equal in point of time, in point of spirit, and in point of argument, to any of the colonies, in the use she made of the monitory language of remonstrance. In March, 1764, the English house of commons passed a declaratory resolution, that it would be proper to impose certain stamp duties in the colonies for the purpose of raising revenue, and other resolutions passed at the same time, laying new duties upon the trade of the colonies. In October, 17G4, the house of assembly of this colony, addressed the king and each house of parliament against all such schemes of taxation. They contended that the power of taxing themselves was interwoven fundamen- 15 tally in their constitution, and was an exclusive and inex- tinguishable right ; and that the people of the colony could not be rightfully taxed without their consent, given by their representatives in general assembly. They declared that they received with the bitterness of grief, the intimation of a design in the British parliament to infringe that inestima- ble right. They complained also of the extension of the powers of the Vice-Admiralty courts, which led to a dange- rous diminution of trial by jury. The assembly reasoned the question of taxation, with the British parliament, in the most eloquent and masterly manner ; they declared that the people of the colony nobly disdained to claim exemp- tion from foreign taxation as a privilege ; they challenged it, and gloried in it as a right. It was a right enjoyed by their fellow subjects in Great Britain, and was the grand principle of the independence of the British house of com- mons ; and they very significantly asked, " why such an odious discrimination ? Why should it be denied to those who submitted to poverty, barbarian wars, loss of blood, loss of money, personal fatigues, and ten thousand unutterable hardships, to enlarge the trade, dominion, and vv'calth of the nation ?" In October, 1765, the house of assembly were represent- ed by a select committee, in a congress of the northern colonies, which met in this city, on the subject of the grievous claims and laws of the British parhament. The chairman of that committee was Judge Livingston, the fa- ther of the late Chancellor of that name ; and he reported to the house the proceedings of the congress, and the house approved of the Conduct and services of the committee. They then united in fresh remonstrances to the king, and each house of parliament, against the stamp act and other statutes imposing taxes upon the colonies without their consent, and against the unwarrantable jurisdiction of the Vice-Admiralty courts. They declared that they were not, and could not, be represented in parliament : and their ad- 10 dresses were spirited and determined, and they certainly ^A ere urged with wciglity and pathetic exhortation. At the close of tlic year 1768, the house of assembly again remonstrated in the most decided style, and in ani- mated addresses to the king and parliament, against the clciims of the British government. They specified their es- sential rights, and cnnnieraled their grievances. They complained of the recent statutes imposing duties and raising revenue from the colonies, without their consent, as being utterly subversive of their constitutional rights. They insisted that the authority of the colonial legislatures could not lawfully be suspended, abridged, or abrogated ; and they considered the suspension of their legislative power, until they should have made provision for the accommoda- tion of the king's troops, as a most dangerous assumption of unlawful power. They strongly urged their complaints of the erection of courts dependent upon the will of a royal governor; of Admiralty courts in which they were deprived of trial by jury, so deservedly celebrated by Englishmen, in ail ages, as essential to their safety ; and of the parliamentary claim of a right to give away their estates, and bind them in all cases whatsoever. They asserted in the most manly ierms, their claim to a participation in those rights and li- berties, which had been declared by magna charta, and re- asserted in the petition and bill of rights, and confirmed at the accession of the house of Orange ; and they reminded the king and parliament of their former loyalty and services, and how often it had been confessed that their zeal had carried them to make contributions beyond their propor- tion, and that the excesses had been reimbursed. These state papers were produced in December, 1768. and they resemble very much in matter, spirit, and style, the resolutions and addresses of the first continental con- gress, in 1774, and they rival them in dignity and value. They were forwarded to the colonial agent at the court of Great Piritain. and that assent was Edmund Burke. And yet 17 for those very proceedings, the assembly was severely re- buked by the governor, Sir Henry Moore, and the legis- lature was dissolved. As the disputes between the mother country and the co- lonies grew more serious, and were evidently approxima- ting to an appeal to arms, the house of assembly began to pause in its career. The influence of the crown upon the legislature of the colony was sensibly felt, and it tended, in ;i considerable degree, to damp their future zeal, and neu- tralize their measures. But the spirit of the people kept equal pace with the views and wishes of their brethren in the other colonies ; and the prominent and splendid lumina- ries in the great scenes of the revolution, now began to ascend above the horizon. The names of Philip Schuyler and George Clinton, appear on the journals of the colony assembly, as members of the house during those noble ef- forts in the year 1768 ; and they were constantly maintain- ed in that station, by their constituents of Albany and Ulster counties, from that year down to the termination of the ex- istence of the colony legislature in April, 1775. The Dutch family of Schuyler stands conspicuous in our colonial an- nals. Colonel Peter Schuyler was mayor of Albany, and commander of the northern militia in 1690. He was dis- tinguished for his probity, and activity in all the various duties of civil and military life. No man understood bet- ter the relation of the colony with the Five Nations of In- dians, or had more decided influence with that confedera- cy. He had frequently chastised the Canadian French for their destructive incursions upon the frontier settlements ; and his zeal and energy were rewarded by a seat in the provincial council ; and the house of assembly gave their testimony to the British court of his faithful services and good reputation. It was this same vigilant officer who gave intelligence to the inhabitants of Deerfield, on Con- necticut river, of the designs of the French and Indians upon them, some short time before. the destruction of that village, ill 1704.'' In 1720, as president of the council, he became acting governor of the colony for a short time, pre- vious to the accession of Governor Burnet.* His son. Colo- nel Philip Schuyler, was an active and efficient member of assembly, for the city and county of Albany, in 1743. But the Philip Schuyler to whom I particularly allude, and who in a subsequent age shed such signal lustre upon the family name, was born at Albany in the year 1733, and at an early age he began to display his active mind, and military spirit. He was a captain in the New-York levies at Fort Edward, in 1755, and accompanied the British army in the expedi- tion down lake George, in the summer of 1758. He was with Lord Howe when he fell by the fire of the enemy, on landing at the north end of the lake ; and he was appointed (as he himself informed me) to convey the body of that young and lamented nobleman to Albany, where he was buried, with appropriate solemnities, in the episcopal church. We next find him, under the title of Colonel Schuyler, in company with his compatriot George Clinton, in the year 1768, on the floor of the house of assembly, taking an active share in all their vehement discussions. Neither of them was to be overawed or seduced from a bold and de- termined defence of the constitutional rights of the colo- nies, and of an adherence to the letter and spirit of the councils of the union. The struggle in the house of as- sembly, between the ministerial and the whig parties, was brought to a crisis in the months of February and March, 1775 ; and in that memorable contest, Philip Schuyler and George Clinton, together with Nathaniel Woodhull of Long Island, acted distinguished parts. On the motions a Smith's Hist, of New-York, vol. i. 92. 94. 137, lf.8. Hoyfs Indian Wars, p. 185. h Colony Journals, vol. i. 438. 19 to give the thanks of the house to the delegates trom tlic colony in the continental congress of September, 1774 ; and to thank the merchants and inhabitants of the colony, for their adherence to the non-importation and the association recommended by congress, those patriots found themselves in the minority. But their courage and resolution gained strength from defeat. On the 3d of March, Colonel Schuy- ler moved declaratory resolutions that the act of 4 Geo. m. imposing duties for raising a revenue in An^erica; and tor extending the jurisdiction of Admiralty courts -, and for de- priving his majesty's subjects in America of trial by jury ; and for holding up an injurious discrimination between the subjects of Great Britain and those of the colonies, were great grievances. The government party seem to have fled the question, and to have left in the house only the scanty number of nine members, and the resolutions were carried by a vote of seven to two. But their opponents imme- diately rallied, and eleven distinct divisions, on different mo- tions, were afterwards taken in the course of that single day, and entered on the journal; and they related to al the momentous points then in controversy, between Great Britain and the United Colonies. It was a sharp and hard fought contest for fundamental principles ; and a more so- lemn and eventful debate rarely ever happened on the floor of a deliberative assembly. The house consisted on that day of twenty-four members, and the ministerial majority was exactly in the ratio of two to one ; and the intrepidity, talent, and services of the three members I have named and especially of Schuyler and Clinton, were above all praise, and laid the foundation for those lavish marks of honour and confidence which theii: countrymen were after- wards so eager to bestow. , The resistance of the majority of the House was fairly broken down, and essentially controlled by the efforts ot the minority and the energy of public opinion. A series of resolutions, declaratory of American grievances, were •20 passed, and petitions to the king and parliament adopted, not indeed in all respects such as the leaders of the mino- rity wished, (for all their amendments were voted down,) but they were nevertheless grounded upon the principles of the American Revolution. They declared that the claims of taxation and absolute sovereignty, on the part of the British parliament, and the extension of admiralty jurisdic- tion, were grievances, and unconstitutional measures; and that the act of parliament, shutting up the port of Boston, and altering the charter of that colony, also were griev- ances. These were the last proceedings of the general assembly of the colony of New- York, which now closed its existence for ever. More perilous scenes, and new and brighter paths of glory, were opening upon the vision of those illus- trious patriots. The delegates from this colony to the first continental congress in 1774, were not chosen ^.y the general assembly, but by the suffrages of the people, manifested in some suf- ficiently authentic shape in the several counties. Among those delegates, and indeed among the whole list of per- sons in this first memorable convention, which assembled at Philadelphia with more than Amphictyonic dignity, there is but the name of a single survivor. He now lives in an adjoining county, in tranquil retirement, with his facul- ties sound, his health comfortable, cherished by his chil- dren, cheered by his friends, and displaying in his conver- sation and manners the wisdom of a sage, and the faith and resignation of a Christian. John Jay was one of the committee in that earliest congress, who drew and re- ported the address to the people of Great Britain. I was assured, in very early life, that he had a special share in its composition. At any rate, it bears the impression of his genius, and it is a production that stands without a rival. The public papers of that congress were all of them, in