SPEECH OP y HON. K. Y. WHALEY, !OF VIRGINIA, DELIVERED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, '^S^/y July 11, 1862, ON A BILL TO PROYIDE FOR THE ADMISSION OF WEST YIRGINIA INTO THE UNION AS A STATE. WASHINGTON, D. C. SCAMMELL & CO., PRINTERS, COR. SECOND & IND. AVENUE, THIRD FLOOR. 1862. SPEECH Mr. WHALEYsaid: _ Mr. Speaker : The people of West Vir- ginia, with unparalleled unaaimit}^, through their Representatives; ask for the separa- tion of their portion of the State from East Virginia, and the admission of it into the Union as a separate^ independent, and sovereign community. If it were a Terri- tory of our national domain, with her su- perficies of about twenty-four thousand square miles, and with her population of nearly four hundred thousand souls, asking admission into the Union, there would be no hesitancy. If it were a mere question of the division of a large State, you would at once refuse to entertain the proposition. If there were not urgent public and Fed- eral reasons therefor, affecting essentially the peace, happiness, and prosperity of West Virginia, you should promptly de- cline to consider the suggestion of the di- vision of the ''Old Dominion." If the causes demanding the separation were tran- sient and evanescent, or such as could be removed without political convulsion and in a nation's lifetime, or such as might con- tinue without the greatest detriment and injustice, if the highest weHare and safety of the Union could be preserved in the present status of affairs, 'tha case would be different. For eighty years have the people of West Virginia suffered from her unnatural connection M-ith East Virginia. For near- ly three generations has she petitioned and sought for the adoption of a liberal and just policy toward her. For almost a cen- tury has she borne the oppression, insult, and contumely of Eastern legislation with- out redress and without relief. Forty years ago, hoping for no change in policy from the Eastern aristocracy, she sought the di- vision of the State; some contending that the Blue Ridge, and others the AUeghaii}'- mountains, should constitute the boundary. The seaboard and Piedmont districts, in- stead of modifying legislation and render- ing it less odious to the people of West Virginia, sought to make it more perma- nently oppressive by detaching the valley from us, extending internal improvements of all descriptions into that section, uniting the people commercially and socially with Pbichmond, treating the West as her rival ia commerce, her enemy, and an inferior. After the metropolitan city of Maryland had extended a branch of its road to Win- chester, the Virginia Legislature denied further charters. The breeding of slaves for southern markets served also to detach the valley from the West and assimilate it to the East. Of the forty-four millions of State debt expended in internal improve- ments up to January 1, 1861, only one and a half millions have been expended in West Virginia. Not only has Virginia re- fused to permit us to improve our country, but when Baltimore proposed to build rail- roads througli our territory at her own ex- pense, the Legislature refused a charter. The antagonism usually finding place be- tween commuuities with social oraaniza- tions so widely different as those of West- ern and Eastern Virginia, developed to such a degree that John Randolph of Ko- anoke spoke in the convention of Virginia of 1829 of the valley and Western Vir- ginia as parts of the State "which I must call alien to us, and forever separated from our interests and feelings, torn by factions. marked by lines which divide her into two different people — distinct in feeling, dis- tinct in possessions, different and antagoni- zing interests." Mr. Baldwin, of Augusta, predicted that "if slave representation should be forced upon them, the final re- sult will be the separation of the State." So oppressive had the legi.slation become, with no hope of relief in the ordinary way, that Mr. Goode, in the convention of A'^ir- ginia in 1851, proposed that the House of Delegates and the Senate should each be divided into two chambers, one composed of those east, and the other of the njeni- bers west of the Blue Ridge, and requiring votes by chambers, and a majority of each chamber necessary to appropriate or raise money by taxes, loans, or otheiwise. Mr. Wise said, "we [the Ea.st] had kept their nose [of the West] to the grindstone for the last seventy-five years in agony." In 18(5U there were 490,887 slaves, of ■whom only 12,771 were west of the Alle- ghanies. By the monstrous system of tax- ation, so unjust to the West, no slave, though worth §1,800 in the market, can be valued over §800 for taxation; and no slave under twelve years can be taxod,' though worth seven or eight hundred dol-i lars. Thus, §200,000,000 of slave property owned in the East, its chief property, has never been taxed at all, while legislation has mainly been for this property and its in- terests; and while every species of income and property in the West has been fully taxed, even to the earnings of the humble toiler for daily bread barely sufficient for family support. Licenses must be paid for at enormous prices for every branch of busi- ness, except the breeding, working, and selling of negroes, giving monopoly to the slave interest of the East, and crushing the free labor of the West. In addition tu the recording fee, the poor man, buying his piece of wild land to clear him a home, must pay his one dollar tax to the State j before his deed can be recorded. So with I all forms of legal process, whether relating ' to the living or the dead. , For eighty years, as at the present, the East has denominated the western lands " waste and unappropriated," and has sold tliem and granted patents of any portions to all who will pay, until the whole country has been affected — two, three, or more, frequently paying taxes on the same land at the same time, thus increasing the rev- enue from the West, keeping titles unset- tled, defrauding and impoverishing the people; the Legislature repeatedly exone- rating lands in the East justly assessed, and by the same act enforcing the payment of a like tax against western lands by or- dering sale. There has been one statute of limitation for lands east, and another for lands west of the Alleghanics. One of the greatest injuries sustained by our Western people has been an organized opposition to a system of free schools and popular education, by which the bright but untutored minds of our mountain ranges and humbler classes have not been devel- oped, while colleges and seminaries for the rich have bcQn fostered bj' Eastern le- gislation. To keep the people in igno- rance is a part of the policy of tlu-ir masters, the forty thousand slave-owners of East Virginia. Since 1776, Virginia has had thirty-three Governors, of whom West Vir- ginia has had five, and twenty-four Ignited States Senators, of which West Virginia has had but three. But the greatest wrong and insult which has degraded us politically and socially is what is called the " mixed basis of repre- sentation." In the west portion of the State there exists a large majority of white population, and in the other portion the slave property interest, and giving rise to diversity of sentiment. The East insists upon protection of property by apportion- ment of representation; that the majority of the people should not rule, but the ma- jority of interests; that the great wealth of the State is in slaves, and that the forty thousand slaveholders of the East should rule; that while eight hundred and ninety- eight thousand people have, say fifty rep- resentatives, $4:95,000 of taxes must also have fifty representatives; that slavery, and not free white men, is the element of political power; that more than one hun- dred and twenty-five thousand citizens of the West are properly denied represeuta- tiou in the councils of the State; that, ■with 'an inmiense majority of free white men in the West, the legishitive power is rightly phiced in the hands of the minority, giving them thirty majority on joint ballot in General Assembly, as Mr. Scott said in the Virginia convention, "to secure property [slaves] by not surrendering the legisla- tive control to a majority of mere num- bers." As i\Ir. Bcal also said, " to protect slavery from West Virginia." The West, on the contrary, while valuing property, values persons more; declares that according to every principle of repub- lican freedom the whole majority, and not slaves, should rule; that a minority of in- terests should not govern a majority of people ; that one dollar in money should not be counted equal to two white men ; that all men are by nature free and inde- pendent; that all power is vested in and derivable from the people; that a majority of tlie people is the only true bsisis of legis- lative power ; that any other basis is a pal- pable infraction of the great American doc- trine. There is a heartfelt and almost uni- versal earnestness of sentiment on the other side of the Alleghanies, that a majority of the community is the true source of politi- cal power ; that no man or set of men ai'e entitled to exclusive emoluments or priv- ileges, and that by the property basis a sectional minority inflicts political degra- dation on a large majority of the popula- tion; that a denial to the majority of the people of the right to protect themselves, each and all alike, is the denial of all re- publican principle; that everything should not pay tribute to the slave power; that the doctrine of the sovereignty of the people is sanctified by time, and tested and confirm- ed by experience, commended by treasure expended, the blood shed, and the suf- ferings endured in the American Revolu- tion. The principle of mixed representation, based partly on property, was imported from South Carolina and planted in the Com- monwealth of Virginia — and later, also, that of secession. And -do you now won- der, under such discipline, that when more than a year ago these oppressors, whose cup of iui([uity was running over, plunged into treason and rebellion, that the people of the West, loyal and true, should not only have rallied under the national flag, but also have rejoiced to escape from such bond- age? Then was reorganized the State government. Our young men and men of middle age gathered around the nation's standard, and rallied, leaving wives and children, aged parents and property, to the mercy of guerrillas and bandits, and num- bering as many, proportionately, in the" loyal army as any portion of the c -uitry, where such •sacrifices as ours are unknoAvn. We have done our duty faithfully in this • crisis. Fidl^r do I endorse what one of our worthy Senators from Virginia [Mr. ^VlL- ley] said in the convention of 1851 : "Our own ginrinus history amply vindicates tho patriot- ism of tile mus.srs vvlio shed thi ir blood most froely iu our revolutionary struggle for iiidcpondence. Whom did tho Father of his Country lead to victory ? Upon whom did ho rely in the ' dark days which tried men's souls':' Was it upon thu slave owner, the land owner, the man of merchan- dise, the wealthy? I will venture the assertion that seven leiUhs of those nohle men hail no title to a foot of the soil tlu'y enriched by their blood, sheil in defence of it ; and. when tliey shoiddered their Icnapsacks they carried on their backs their entire stock of goods and chattels. Yet we confided in them. We filaced in their keeping our lives and fortunes and sacred lionor, and we were not betrayed. Wliy the shouts of the victories of Cliepultepx and Buena Visui are still echoing in ou'- moiuitains and tloating across your lowlands? Wlio fought thu'so brilliant achievements? Our landhrds, our slam ownnrs, or Ihe iccalthy jn'oprielaries of Iheoiuntry? No, sir. No." I would fill our hills and valleys with a population loving the Union, men of in- dustry and enterprise ; would give to our free and manly people the control of their own legislation, and emancipate them from the thraldom of disloyal and wasted Pjastern Virginia. Mr. Speaker, this is a question in which the whole people of America have a deep interest. It is the appeal of West Virginia for equal rights, for the rights of the peo- ple against the rights of money — mammon against liberty. AV^ill the gentlemen of this Congress, Democrats and Republicans, discard the tried and well-established doc- trine of the right of the majority to gov- ern? Will you not gixaranty to us the en- joyment of this right? Will you permit every vestige of liberty to be swept away from Virginia? Safety, quiet, peace, and liberty can only be found in separation. Will you compel us to continue a connec- tion not only repiilsive to our feelings, but utterly repugnant to all the principles of free government? Will you force us to be ruled over by an odious and most offen.sive aristocracy? to be dependent serfs of our Eastern lords? Will the Republican and Democratic masses of the North sustain you 6 in compellin