,
W
?%
■\
:
^
-J. ft <5 O .4 qV
tf
yo
// /
HISTORY
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL
SOCIETY.
1829-1878.
"^*iifc>
DF
>, 1880.
WASH»« c t
BOSTON :
PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY.
1880.
ft.
■ Ms i
COPYRIGHT, 1880,
BY THE MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Stereotyped and Printed
By Rand, Avery, {?> Company,
117 Franklin Street,
Bolton.
PREFACE.
The first movement towards the present work was on the
7th of January, 1854, when, on motion of Charles M. Hovey,
it was voted " that the Committee on Publication be request-
ed to consider the propriety of publishing so much of the
history and proceedings of the Society as they may deem im-
portant for present use and future reference." In January,
1859, and also in January, 1860, the subject was again con-
sidered; but no action appears to have been taken until 1861.
On the 7th of February, of that year, on motion of Edward
S. Rand, it was voted " that a committee of six (of which the
president shall be chairman) be appointed, who shall be au-
thorized to collect and publish, in a form to correspond with
the present Transactions of the Society, a complete record of
all its proceedings from 1829 to 1862, inclusive, together with
such other matter as shall in their judgment be desirable or
necessary to complete a full and connected history of the
Society from its commencement to the present time, and
that the Committee be authorized to employ such assistance
in the preparation of the work as they may find necessary."
This committee consisted of President Joseph Breck, Edward
S. Rand, Marshall P. Wilder, Charles M. Hovey, Joseph S.
Cabot, and Eben Wight. Rev. Luther Farnham was appoint-
iii
iv PREFACE.
ed editor, and prepared the history to the close of the year
1862. President Breck stated in his valedictory address in
January, 18G3, that the work would require revision, and
there the subject rested for some years.
In 1871, it was placed in the hands of a new committee,
consisting of President William C. Strong, Marshall P.
Wilder, Charles M. Hovey, Francis Parkman, Charles O.
Whit more, and E. W. Buswell, who employed the present
secretary of the Society to revise and complete the work.
Under their direction and that of the Standing Committee
on Publication and Discussion, it has been brought down to
include the first half century of the Society's existence.
The sources from which the materials of the History have
been derived besides the Records and Transactions of the
Society are mainly the New England Farmer, the Magazine
of Horticulture, and the Horticulturist. Other sources of
information are acknowledged in notes, especially in the in-
troductory chapter. This, it is believed, comprises a fuller
account of the commencement and progress of horticulture
throughout our country than can be found elsewhere, and
will be of general interest.
The Committee have added to the work a portrait of Gen.
Dearborn, to whom as its first president the Society is most
indebted for that prestige which it has ever retained under
his successors, and which has secured for it a foremost place
among similar institutions. The volume is also enriched
with views of the halls erected by the Society. The appen-
dix contains, besides the matters referred to in the body of the
work, a list of all the officers and members of the Society
from its foundation. The editor, Robert Manning, has
brought to the work the utmost faithfulness and a constant
endeavor to secure strict accuracy. The investigation of
PREFACE. V
records often obscure has required much time and labor, and
unwearied application, and to him is due the credit of bring-
ing the history to its present form. The work meets the ap-
proval of the Committee of Publication, and they believe will
be received with favor by the members of the Society and
the public at large.
With the above account of the origin and progress of the
work it is now offered as a simple and truthful record of
the history of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, and
as a contribution to the history of American horticulture.
WILLIAM C. STRONG,
A. B. MUZZEY,
E. LEWIS STURTEVANT,
Committee of Publication.
CONTENTS.
INTRODUCTION.
PAGE.
Sketch of the History of Horticulture in the United
States up to 1829 1
CHAPTER I.
The Organization and Objects of the Society ... 55
CHAPTER II.
Mount Auburn purchased by the Horticultural Society,
and an Experimental Garden and Cemetery estab-
lished 69
CHAPTER III.
The Progress of Mount Auburn under the Auspices of
the Horticultural Society, and the Separation of
the Two Interests by Mutual Agreement ... 85
CHAPTER IV.
The Finances of the Society 119
CHAPTER V.
The Rooms occupied by the Society, including the Erec-
tion and Dedication of the First and Second Horti-
cultural Halls 140
CHAPTER VI.
The Library of the Society . . . . *. . . 184
vii
viii CONTENTS.
CHAPTER VII.
PAGE.
The Exhibitions of the Society, 1829-1844 .... 213
CHAPTER VIII.
The Exhibitions of the Society, 1845-1864 .... 271
CHAPTER IX.
The Exhibitions of the Society, 1865-1878 .... 346
CHAPTER X.
General Review of the Work and Influence of the So-
APPENDIX.
454
Acts of Incorporation; Standing Committees, 1829; Sub-
scribers for the First Hundred Lots in Mount Auburn;
Acts authorizing the Society to establish a Ceme-
tery; Act to incorporate the Proprietors of Mount
Auburn ; Indentures between the Society and Mount
Auburn ; Reports of Standing Committees, 1829 ; Award
of Premiums, 1830 ; Officers and Members of the
Society 475
INTRODUCTION.
SKETCH OF THE HISTORY OF HORTICULTURE IN THE
UNITED STATES UP TO THE TEAR 1829.
The history of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society may be
appropriately introduced by a sketch of the commencement and
progress of horticulture in this country, and especially in Massa-
chusetts, previously to the formation of the Societ}^. Though the
primary object of the first settlers of the State was freedom in the
enjoyment of civil and religious libert}', their attention was, like
that of all other colonists, turned to the cultivation of the soil
as a means of subsistence. They brought with them a share of
that love of gardening which the}' had in their former home, and
we find them, from the very first, engaged in the growth, not
only of the grains which afford the staff of life, but of fruits and
vegetables, which, to a certain extent, are regarded as luxuries ;
and one or two notices show that the cultivation of flowers was
not wholly neglected.
The report brought by the explorers sent out by the Pilgrims on
the 16th of November, 1620, that they found "clivers fair Indian
baskets, filled with corn, some whereof was in ears, fair and good,
of divers colors, which seemed to them a very goodly sight, having
seen none before, of which rarities they took some to cany to their
friends on shipboard, like as the Israelites' spies brought from
Eshcol some of the good fruits of the land," 1 is in the spirit of
men who not only rejoiced in finding the means of subsistence, but
loved the culture of the ground.
The scattered notices in the early writers show the Pilgrims as
glad to learn of the aborigines the method of manuring and plant-
ing their fields of Indian corn. " Squanto showed them how to set,
1 Morton's New England's Memorial, p. 40, ed. 1828.
2 INTRODUCTION.
Bsh, dress and tend it." ' The Indians used to put two or throe fishes
(generally alewives, though sometimes shad or horseshoe crabs
were used) into every corn-hill. 9 The Pilgrims were obliged to watch
their corn by night, to keep the wolves from the fish, until it was
rotten, which was in about fourteen days. 8 And in L621 "the
governor requested Massasoit to exchange some of their corn, for
seed, with ours, that we might judge which best agreed with the
soil where we live." The natives were acquainted with the advan-
tage of selecting the finest ears of corn for seed, and taught the
settlers to do the same. 4 The}- possessed varieties adapted to
the warmer or colder parts of the country. One field cultivated by
them in the present State of Maine is said to have comprised
three hundred acres. Their practice of planting corn when the
leaves of the white oak were as large as a mouse's oar has come
down to our own time.
The savages were accustomed to burn the country over twice
a year, viz., in spring and fall: otherwise it would have been
grown over with underwood, and impassable. By this means the
trees grew hero and there, as in parks. 6
In the spring of 1621, which followed that first winter " of awful
sublimity of suffering," the Pilgrims at Plymouth had made con-
siderable progress in gardening as early as the first of March ;
the season, most fortunately, being a forward one. They planted
twenty acres of Indian corn, and six acres of barley and pease.
manuring the ground with herrings, or rather shads, after the
Indian manner. The corn did well, the barley was "indifferent
good, but our pease not worth the gathering, for we feared they were
too late sown. They came up very well, and blossomed : but the sun
parched them in the blossom." 6 As early as 1632 there might
have been seen in one township a hundred acres together sot with
these fish, every aero taking a thousand of them ; and an acre
thus dressed would produce as much corn as throe without. 7
" Here are grapes." wrote Edward Winslow in 1621, " white and
red, and very sweet and strong also; strawberries, gooseberries,
raspberries, &c. ; plums of three sorts, white, black, and red, being
almosl as good as a damson ; abundance of roses, white, red. and
damask, single, but very sweet indeed." 8
i Young's < hnm. of the Filgrinusp. 230. r ' Morton's New Eng- Canaan, Bk. 1. Chap. XVITT.
' Ibid., i>. -1. o Young's Chronicles, p. 230.
» Ibid., p. 371. 7 Morton's X. E. Canaan, Bk. II. Chap. VII.
I K. port of the Mass. Board of Agriculture, 1853, p. 5. 8 Young's Chronicles, p. :34.
HORTICULTURE OF THE PILGRIMS. 3
Besides records of farm and garden crops planted bj" the Pil-
grims for their immediate sustenance, other memorials have come
down to us in the very trees set out by them, such as the apple
tree planted at Marshfield, about 1G48, by Peregrine White, the
first Englishman born in New England. This survived as a rep-
resentative of his orchard, and the land on which it stood passed
b}' inheritance to his descendants, until a few years ago, when,
being sold, the tree was cut down by the purchaser. A lithograph
of the old tree may be found in Russell's Guide to Plymouth,
published in 1846, when it was described as measuring seventeen
feet in height, and the old trunk, then mostly decayed, six feet
in length and four and one-half feet in circumference, and as still
bearing fruit. The pear tree imported from England by Gov.
Prence or Prince, about 1640, and planted on his homestead at
Eastham, on Cape Cod, was described in 1836 as a flourishing,
lofty tree, producing, on an average, fifteen bushels of fruit a 3-ear. 1
The fruit is medium sized, oval, green nearly covered with russet,
ripening in September, of poor quality by modern pomological
standards, and known by the general name of Fall pear. The suck-
ers springing up from the root produce the same, proving that it
has never been grafted. In the memorable storm when the Minot's
Ledge lighthouse was destroyed, in April, 1851, the larger of two
stems which then formed the tree was blown down. The remain-
ing stem is now, according to the testimony of Capt. Ezekiel Doane,
the present owner of the tree, about five feet around the butt, and
thirty-five feet high.
Another pear tree, still standing in Yarmouth, was planted by
Anthoiv^ Thacher, about 1640, near where his house then stood.
It is a large, rotten-hearted tree, having lost all its old branches,
but thrown out many new ones. It is a summer pear of inferior
qualit}\ The tree produced a fair crop in 1872. 2
Besides these trees, many others planted by the first settlers, or
before the year 1700, are yet standing, and a still greater number
are remembered as having perished since the commencement of
the present century. They were all, however, of inferior quality
as to their fruit, but all strong growers. Large trees of the High-
top Sweeting, of very ancient date, as well as other varieties of
apples, are still standing in the Old Colony. A row of Hightop
1 Hovey's Magazine of Horticulture, Vol. VT. p. 430.
2 Letter from Amos Otia of Yarmouthport.
4 INTRODUCTION.
Sweetings in Marshfield is reputed to have been planted more than
two hundred years ago. Mr. Otis, whose letter is quoted above,
Bays, that, in many historical researches, he has found that the first
settlers in Barnstable and Yarmouth, with scarcely an exception,
planted pear trees near their dwellings, and that this fact has
enabled him to determine localities which would otherwise have
been doubtful.
The Red Kentish was the only cherry, and the Damson the only
plum cultivated. The seeds of these as well as of the other trees
were brought by the Pilgrims from England. The " Sugar " pear,
probably a French variety, brought, perhaps, from Acadia, was
introduced about 1680. The Rhode Island Greening apple was
introduced about 1765. Up to 17.30, very few apples not originat-
ing in the Old Colony were cultivated. All the Hightop Sweetings
known were grafted trees. Among the ancient seedling varieties
were the Foxwell, Pig Nose, Bachelor's Button, Pearmains, and
others. Of seedling pears, the Ewer and Aunt Desire. The poorer
sorts of fruit were very early grafted with better kinds.
The notices of horticultural operations in the history of the
Massachusetts Colony are much fuller than in that of Plymouth.
The most prominent persons in these operations were Govs. En-
dicott and WInthrop, as at Plymouth Gov. Prince. Either the
chroniclers did not think it worth while to record the gardening
operations of others, or, as was more probably the case, the colo-
nists generally were too much occupied in the cultivation of corn
and other crops necessary for their subsistence to undertake the
cultivation of fruits and other productions which were classed as
luxuries.
The land, new and rich in mould, the accumulation of ages, did
not require very careful cultivation to secure an abundant return ;
but a few years of constant cropping exhausted its productiveness.
The Rev. Francis Iligginson, writing in 1629, says, "The aboun-
danl encrease of corne proves this eountrc}' to bee a wonderment.
Thirtie. lbrtie, fiftie, sixtie, are ordinarie here: Yea, Joseph's
encrease in Egypt is out-stript here with us. Our planters hope to
have more then an hundred fould this yere. And all this while I
am within compasse. What will you sa}- of two hundred fould and
upwards? It is almost incredible what great gaine some of our
English planters have had by our Indian corne. . . . There is not
such grcate and plentifull eares of corne, I suppose anywhere else
THE MASSACHUSETTS COLONY. O
to bee found but in this countrey: Because also of varietie of
colours, as red, blew, and yellow : and of one corne there springeth
four or five hundred. . . . Our governor hath store of green pease
growing in his garden, as good as ever I eat in England. The
countrie aboundeth naturally with store of rootes of great vari-
etie and good to eat. Our turnips, parsnips, and carrots are
here both bigger and sweeter than is ordinary to be found in
England. Here are store of pompions, cowcumbers, and other
things of that nature which I know not. . . . Excellent vines are
here, up and down in the woodes. Our governor hath already
planted a vineyard with great hope of encrease. Also mulberries,
plums, rasberries, corrance, chesnuts, filberds, walnuts, smalnuts,
hurtleberries, and hawes of whitethorne, neere as good as our
cherries in England ; they grow in plentie here." x
Master Graves, in his letter appended to the above quoted
account of New England's Plantation, gives this glowing descrip-
tion of the luxuriance of vegetation in 1629 : —
" Thus much I can affirme in generall, that I never came to a
more goodly country in all my life, all things considered. If it
hath not at any time been manured and husbanded yet it is very
beautifull in open lands mixed with goodly woods, and again open
plains, in some places five hundred acres, some places more, some
lesse, not much troublesome for to cleere for the plough to goe in ;
no place barren but on the tops of the hills ; the grasse and weedes
grow up to a man's face ; in the lowlands and by fresh rivers
aboundance of grasse, and large meddowes without any tree or
shrubbe to hinder the sith. I never saw, except in Hungaria, unto
which I alwayes paralell this countrie, in all our most respects : for
everything that is heare eyther sowne or planted, prospereth far
better then in Old England. The increase of corne is here farre
beyond expectation, as I have seene here by experience in barly,
the which, because it is so much above your conception I will not
mention. . . . Vines doe grow here plentifully laden with the
biggest grapes that ever I saw : some I have seene foure inches
about. . . . Wee abound with such things which, next under God,
doe make us subsist : as fish, foule, deere ; and sundrie sorts of
fruits, as musk-millions, water-millions, Indian pompions, Indian
pease, beanes, and many other odde fruits that I cannot name." 2
i Mass. Historical Society's Collections, First Series, Vol. I. p. 118.
2 Ibid., p. 124.
6 INTRODUCTION".
On the arrival of trie " Arabella " at Salem, the 12th of June,
1G30, " the common people immediately went ashore, and regaled
themselves with strawberries, which are very fine in America, and
were then in perfection." 1 Roger Williams says, "The straw-
berry Ls the wonder of all the fruits growing naturally in these
parts. In some places where the natives have planted, I have
many times seen as many as would fill a good ship within a few
miles' compass." 2
The earliest agricultural account of Massachusetts is New-
England's Prospect, by William Wood, who came to this coun-
try in 1629, and returned to England August 15, 1633. He
says : 8 " The ground affoards very good kitchin gardens, for Tur-
neps, Parsnips, Carrots. Radishes, and Pompions, Muskmillions,
Isquouter-squashes, Coucumbers, Onyons, and whatever growes
well in England grows as well there, many things being better and
larger : there is likewise growing all manner of Hearbes for meate
and medicine, and that not onely in planted Gardens but in the
Woods, without either the art or helpe of man as sweet Marjoran,
Purselane, Sorrell, Peneriall, Yarrow, Mirtle, Saxifarilla. Bayes,
&c. There is likewise Strawberries in abundance, verie large ones,
some being two inches about ; one may gather halfe a bushell in a
forenoone. In other seasons there be Gooseberries, Bilberries,
Resberries, Treackleberries. Hurtleberries, Currants ; which being
dried in the Sunne are little inferior to those that our Grocers sell
in England." 4
Other natural productions are thus described : —
" The Hornebound tree growing with broad spread Armes. the
vines winde their curling branches about them ; which vines afford
great store of grapes, which are very bigge, both for the grape and
Cluster, sweet and good ; These be of two sorts, red and white,
there is likewise a smaller kinde of grape which groweth in the Isl-
ands, which is sooner ripe and more delectable ; so that there is no
knowne reason why as good wine may not be made in those parts as
well as in Burdenaux in France being under the same degree. . . .
'• The (heme trees yeeld great store of Cherries which grow on
clusters like grapes ; they lie much smaller than our English cherry,
nothing neare so good if they be not fully ripe, they so furre the
mouth that the tongue will cleave to the roofe, and the throat wax
1 Hutchinson's History of Muss., Vol. I. p. 25, ed. 1795. » First ed., p. 11.
1 Mass. riist. Coll., First Series, Vol. III. p. 2a. * Ibid., pp. 11, 12.
PROGRESS OF GARDENING. <
hoarse with swallowing those red Bullies (as I may call them)
being little better in taste. English ordering ma}' bring them to be
an English cherrie, but yet they are as wilde as the Indians. The
Plursmes of the Countrey be better for Plumbs than the Cherries
be for Cherries ; they be blacke and yellow, about the bignesse of a
Damson, of a reasonable good taste. The white thorne affords
hawes as big as an English Cherrie, which is esteemed above a
Cherrie for his goodnesse and pleasantnesse to the taste." *
It appears, from the same writer, that, as at Plymouth, the ocean
afforded the fertilizers for the crops of the first settlers. "The
English," he says, " use to manure their land with fish, which they
doe, hot because the land could not bring corne without it, but
because it brings more with it, the land being kept in hart the
longer." 2 At Salem, "very bad sandie ground had for seaven
yeares together brought forth exceeding good corne, by being
fished but every third yeare." 3 It seems to have been but a short
time before some kinds of fish became too scarce to be used as
manure ; for on the 22d of May, 1639, it was forbidden after the
20th of the next month to use any cod or bass fish for manuring.
Heads and offal might be used for corn. 4 Wood also gives the fol-
lowing account of the agriculture of the aborigines, from which it
would appear to be more careful than has generally been supposed :
" An other work 5 is their planting of corne, wherein they exceede
our English husband-men, keeping it so cleare with their Clamme
shell-hooes as if it were a garden rather than a corne-field ; not
suffering a choaking weede to advance his audacious head above
their infant corne or an undermining worm to spoil his spumes." 6
From his notices of different settlements it would appear that
horticulture had made quite as much progress as could be expected
in so short a time. In Dorchester he found " very good arable
ground, and hay grounds, faire Corn-fields, and pleasant Gardens
with Kitchin-gardens." "The inhabitants" of Roxbury "have
faire houses, store of Cattle, impaled Corne-fields, and fruitfull
Gardens." Boston had "very good land, affording rich Corne-
fields, and fruitfull Gardens; likewise, sweet and pleasant
Springs." Of Lynn he says, " There is more English tillage
than in New England and Virginia besides; which proved as
well as could be expected, the corne being very good, especially
the Barley, Rye, and Oates."
i Wood, pp. 15, 16. » Wood, p. 37. 6 Of the Indian women.
2 Ibid., p. 10. 4 Mass. Records, Vol. I. p. 258. « Wood, p. 81.
8 INTRODUCTION.
John Josselyn, who styled himself " gentleman," made a voyage
to New England in 1G38 and 1G3'J, and another in 1GG3, when he
sojourned till 1G71 ; and in his account of these two vo}-ages,
especially the latter, and in his New-Englands Rarities Dis-
covered, he gives a fuller, but, unfortunately, a less trustworthy
account, than that of Wood. 1
" The plants in New England," he says, " for the variety, num-
ber, beauty, and vertues ma}- stand in Competition with the plants
of any Countrcy in Europe. Johnson hath added to Ghrard's
Herbal 300, and Parkinson mentioneth many more ; had they been
in Xi'/v- England they might have found 1000 at least never heard
of nor seen by an}- Englishman before : 'Tis true, the countiy hath
no Bonerets or Tartar lambs, no glittering coloured Tuleps; but
here you have the American Mary-Gold, the Earth-nut bearing a
princely Flower, the beautiful leaved Pirola, the honied Colibry,
&c." 2
" Red-Lilly growes all over the Countrey amongst the bushes." 8
"Our fruit-Trees prosper abundantly, Apple-trees, Pear-trees,
Quince-trees, Cherry-trees, Plum-trees, Barberry-trees. I have
observed with admiration that the Kernels sown or the Succors
pin nt id produce as fair & good fruit without grafBug as the Tree
from whence they were taken : the Countrey is replenished with fair
and large Orchards. It was affirmed by one Mr. Woolcut (a magis-
trate in Connecticut Colony) at the Captain's Messe (of which I
was) aboard the Ship I came home in that he made Five hundred
Hogsheads of Syder out of his own Orchard in one year, Syder is
very plentiful in the Countrc}-, ordinarily sold for Ten shillings a
Hogshead. At the Tap-houses in Boston I have had an Ale-quart
spie'd and sweetened with Sugar for a groat. . . .
"The Quinces, Cherries, Damsons, set the Dames a work, Mar-
malad and preserved Damsons is to be met with in every house.
It was not long before I left the Countrey that I made Cherry wine,
and so ma}- others, for there are good store of them both red and
black." 4
Jossebyn describes with much minuteness many of the plants
which he observed, classif}-ing them as 1st, Such plants as are
1 The quotations from the Voyages are taken from the reprint in the Massachusetts
Historical Society's Collections, Third Series, Vol. III., and those from the Rarities, from
Tuckennan'a edition ; the references in both cases being to the original pages.
1 Second Voyage, p. 59.
s Ibid., p. 79.
« Ibid., pp. 189, 190.
FLOWERS AND WEEDS INTRODUCED. 9
common in England ; 2d, Such plants as are proper to the county ;
3d, Such plants as are proper to the country and have no names ;
4th, Such plants as have sprung up since the English planted
and kept cattle in New England ; and, 5th, Such garden herbs
amongst us as do thrive there and such as do not.
Among those of the second class which attracted his attention
were earth-nuts, one sort bearing most beautiful flowers J of which
Winslow records that the Pilgrims during their first winter "were
enforced to live on ground-nuts," 2 and also interesting to modern
horticulturists from the propositions which have been made, look-
ing to its improvement so as to make it a valuable esculent root. 8
But this plant has lost its opportunity ; and what value lies unde-
veloped in it we shall probably never know, unless the potato
becomes far worse diseased than at present. In his third division
he gives 4 a woodcut of a leaf of the Goodyera pubescens, or rattle-
snake plantain, as unmistakable as the colored plate in the Flore
des Serres, and regrets that he failed of carrying this plant, which
he "judged to be a kind of pirola and a very beautiful plant,"
and which has become so much sought after in our day for fern-
cases, etc., to England as a rarity of great value. His fourth
class is both curious and interesting, if we can depend upon the
accuracy of the names, as showing how rapidly foreign weeds were
usurping the places of native plants. He mentions the couch-grass,
shepherd' s-purse, dandelion, groundsel, nettle, plantain, knot-
grass, "cheek-weed" 5 and several others besides the purslain,
which we find among his garden herbs. All the common garden
herbs and vegetables, with few exceptions, were found to grow
well; and among flowers he mentions hollyhocks, gillyflowers,
sweet-brier or eglantine, and English roses ; which last, he says,
thrive " veiy pleasantly." 6 This appears to be, with the excep-
tion of Winslow's "fair white lily and sweet fragrant rose" among
other flowers in his rough rlrymes, the first intimation we have of
the cultivation of garden flowers ; a neglect which we ascribe rather
to the necessity of first attending to the growth of such plants as
afforded subsistence than to lack of taste.
Some of our most injurious insects were very early noticed.
Josselyn says, "there is a Bug that lyes in the earth and eateth the
1 1ST. E. Rarities, p. 56. * N. E. Rarities, p. 67.
2 Young's Chronicles, p. 329. B Ibid., pp. 85, 86.
a Journal of the London Horticultural Society, Vol. II. p. 144. 8 Ibid., pp. 87-91.
10 INTRODUCTION".
seed, that is somewhat like a Maggot, of a white colour with a red
head, and ia about the bignes of ones finger and an inch or an
inch and a half long ; " 1 undoubtedly the larva of the May beetle
(Lachnosterna fusca), so troublesome to modern cultivators.
"There La also a dark, donnish Worm or Bug of the bigness of
an Oaten-straw, and an inch long, that in the spring lye at the
Root of Corn and Garden plants all day and in the night creep out
and devour them" (probably some species of Iladena, or cut-
worm) ; and he gives what he rightly calls a " somewhat strange
way to get rid of them, which the English have learnt of the
Indians." 2 From his remark that " I never heard or did sec in
eight years' time one worm eaten Pea," 8 it would appear that
the pea-weevil (Bruchus pisi), said b}' entomologists to be a
native of this country, was either not known in New England,
or had not learned to prefer the exotic pea, in which only it is
now found, to its original food, whatever that may have been. In
1GG1 John Hull related that " the canker worm hath for lower
years devoured most of the apples in Boston, that the apple
trees look in June as if it was the 9th month." They were
again veiy destructive in 1770. In 1G65, 1G86, and 1708, fasts
were held in Salem for deliverance from caterpillars, palmer
worms, and other destructive insects. 4
The curculio was abundant as earl}* as 1746 ; for John Bartram,
writing to Peter Collinson in that year, of the sloe, says, "the
blossoms are prodigious full, but never one ripe fruit. They art-
bit with the insect as all our stone fruit is, but the Peaches and
some kinds of Cherries overgrow them." 6
Josselyn in his Second Voyage described Boston as having
the south side adorned with fair orchards and gardens ; and similar
language was used in regard to Dorchester, Roxbury, Dedham,
Charlestown, Marblehead, and Ipswich. 6 lie says 7 that the
Indians had kidney-beans (which they boiled), pompions, and
watermelons. He also makes frequent mention of them else-
where. Some of the beans, he says, were indigenous, and others
introduced. Champlain also, 1G04-K', lo. speaks in many places
of their cultivating beans and squashes. Marquette, who in L673
1 Second Voyage, p. 115. * Darlington's Memorials of Bartram and Marshall, p. 175.
! Ibid., p. 116. • Second Voyage, pp. 160-168.
s N. E. Rarities, p. 88. » Ibid., pp. 129, 130.
4 Felt's Annals of Salem, Vol. II. p. 127.
THE ENDICOTT PEAR TREE. 11
descended the Wisconsin and Mississippi, commended the agricul-
ture of the aborigines. Their beans and melons he found excellent ;
but their squashes were not of the best. The researches of Dr.
Gray 1 have made it probable that the Jerusalem artichoke (Ileli-
anthus tuberosus) is indigenous, and was cultivated by the Ilurons.
It excites some surprise to notice how rapidly the aborigines availed
themselves of the vegetables introduced by the Europeans, and
raised orchards of fruit trees, especially the peach and apple.
We find in the records of the Massachusetts Company the evi-
dence of forethought for the interests of the Colony in the form of
a memorandum on the lGth of March, 1629, " To provide to send
for New England, Vyne Planters, Stones of all sorts of fruites, as
peaches, plums, filberts, cherries, pear, aple, quince kernells, pome-
granats, also wheate, rye, barley, oates, woad, saffron, liquorice
seed, and madder rootes, potatoes, hop rootes, currant plants." 2 In
a letter from the governor and deputy of the New England Colony
to the governor and council in New England, April 17, 1629,
they sa}', " As for fruit stones and kernells the tj'ine of the }'eare
fitts not to send them now, soe wee purpose to do it by our next." 8
It would appear from Jossebyn's account, 4 that these seeds were
afterwards sent, and had sprung up and prospered.
As in the Plymouth Colony we find a tree surviving from the
orchard planted by an early governor, so in the Massachusetts
we have one remaining from the orchard planted by Gov. Endicott.
The time of planting of this tree has been given from the date,
1630, on a sun-dial which stood near it, and which, the governor
said, bore the age of the tree. It has, however, been questioned
whether this tradition is correct, as the land whei*e it stands was
not granted to John Endicott until 1632, and it is improbable that
the governor would have commenced cultivation before he had
obtained a legal right to the land. If the family tradition, that
the tree came over from England in the " Arabella " with Gov.
Winthrop, June, 1630, is correct, it may have been planted at
Gov. Endicott's town residence, 6 before the grant of the farm.
The fact that the governor and his descendants lived upon the
farm until 1816, and that the}' held it by the original grant until
1828, a period of one hundred and ninety-six 3 r ears, strengthens
our faith in the traditionary account of the age of the tree. 6
1 American Agriculturist, 1877, p. 142. * Ante, p. 8.
2 Mass. Records, Vol. I. p. 24. B Ante, p. 5.
» Ibid., p. 392. « Hovey's Magazine, Vol. XLS., p. 254.
12 INTRODUCTION.
Gov. Eixlicott's farm was known as Orchard as early as 1G43, 1
and the pear tree stood near the site of his mansion. The tree
has never been grafted, as is shown by the fact that two suckers
produce the same fruit as the main part of the tree. The fruit
is of inferior quality, even coarser than that of the Gov. Prince
pear tree. Tradition reports that the " woodwax" (Genista tinc-
toria) which covers the rock}- pastures around Salem was intro-
duced as a flower in Gov. Endicott's garden.
In 1G48 Gov. Endicott exchanged five hundred apple trees, of
three years' growth, with "William Trask, for two hundred and fifty
acres of land. 2 This statement, and the allusions, in his corre-
spondence with Gov. Winthrop, to the exchanges which they car-
ried on, very much after the manner of modern fruit growers, give
us an idea that he was engaged quite extensively in propagating
fruit trees. Writing to Winthrop the second month, 8 22d, 1644,
he says, " I humblie and heaxtilie thanck you for your last lettre
of newes & for the trees 3011 sent mee. ... I haue not sent you
any trees because I heard not from you, but I haue trees for 3-ou
if 3-011 please to accept of them whensoeuer 3-ou shall send. I
thinck it is to late to sett or remoue. I could wish 3-ou to remoue
in the latter end of the yeare 3-0111- trees, & I pray 3-ou send mee
what 3-011 want & I will suppby what I can. M3- children burnt
mee at least 500 trees this spring b3* setting the ground on fire
neere them." 4
To John Winthrop, jun., at " Tenne Hills " he writes, the 19th
of the first month, 1G45, " Let mee say truelie I account not my-
selfe to be the lesse ingaged vnto you concerning what you wrote,
ffor an3 r such small courtesie as a few trees. . . . What trees }-ou
want at au3* t3'me send to mee for them, & I will suppby 3-011 as
longe as I haue a tree. I ame sony 3-0 u make so many apologies
& cautiones to mee, I partly guesse from whence it proceeds, &
that is because I told 3-ou I was ingaged to pa3' 1,500 this springe.
I haue almost paid them, & it was to excuse truely that I could
not send 3-ou such trees as I would haue otherwise done ; but for
small trees I can spare 3*ou as man3' more as I haue sent, & would
now haue done it, but 3-our man thought the horse (not being well)
would not carrie them." This letter is dated at " Orchard," and
1 Memoir of John Endicott, by C. M. Endicott, p. 72.
s Ibid., p. 80.
» April.
« Mass. Hist. Coll., Fourth Series, Vol. VI. pp. 146, 147.
GOVERNOR WINTHROP S GARDEN". 13
in a postscript Endicott says that " Your man hath some Indico
seeds for yourselfe and Mr. Piter. ' ' x
Traditions exist of the Indians having planted on the peninsula
of Boston, clearing away the wood, as was their custom, by burn-
ing. 2 William Blackstone, the first settler, cultivated six acres of
land around his residence, which was near what is now the corner
of Beacon and Charles Streets. A part of this was planted as a
garden, where he raised apple trees which continued to bear fruit
as late as 17G5. After his removal to Rhode Island, he planted
at Study Hill, near Pawtucket, the first orchard that ever bore
apples in that State. " He had the first apples of the sort called
Yellow Sweetings that ever were in the world." 8
In April, 1632, Conant's Island in Boston harbor was granted
to Gov. Winthrop for forty shillings and a yearly rent of twelve
pence, he promising to plant a vineyard and an orchard, of which
the fifth part of the fruits were to be paid yearly to the governor for
the time being forever. The name of the island was thenceforth to
be " The Governor's Garden." On the 4th of March, 1634-35 the
General Court changed the rent to " a hogshead of the best wyne
that shall grow there, to be paide yearely, after the death of the
said John Winthrop and noething before." The grape culture, if
ever seriously undertaken, undoubtedly proved a failure ; for in
1640 the rent was again changed to " two bushells of apples every
yeare, one bushell to the Governor & another to the Generall Court
in winter, — the same to bee of the best apples there growing."
Accordingly we find in the records of the General Court held at
Boston the seventh day of the eighth month, 1640, formal men-
tion that " Mr. Winthrop, Senior, paid in his bushell of apples." 4
Josselyn mentions, that when ready to sail from Boston, the 11th
of October, 1639, "Mr. Luxon, our master, having been ashore
upon the Governours Island gave me half a score very fair Pippins
which he brought from thence." 5
Among the incidental proofs of the attention given to horticul-
ture is the enactment, in 1646, b} T the court of the Colony of Mas-
sachusetts, that the person who should be known to rob any
orchard or garden, or who should injure or steal any graft or fruit
tree, should forfeit treble damages to the owner. 6
i Mass. Hist. Coll., Fourth Series, Vol. VI. p. 150 a.
2 Drake's Old Landmarks of Boston, p. 10.
3 Snow's History of Boston, p. 62. s First Voyage, p. 29.
* Mass. Records, Vol. I. pp. 94, 139, 293, 301. « Mass. Records, Vol. U. p. 180.
14 INTRODUCTION.
From notes made 1646-48 in an interleaved almanac belonging
to S. Danforth, then probably a resident of Cambridge, we find
the dates of gathering several varieties of apples, the Long apples.
Blackston's, 1 Tankerd, Kreton Pippin, Long lied apples, Russetin,
and Pearmaines. They were all ripe in August and September.
" Apricoks " were ripe Jul}- 20; and the "Great Pears," August
1, though what variety ripening at that season could deserve the
name of " great " must be a puzzle to modern pomologists. 2
The correspondence of John Winthrop, jun., shows that he, as
well as his father, was interested in the cultivation of fruit trees.
Edward Howes wrote, " From our new howse in Lincolnes Inn feilds
near Prince's Streete," the 18th of April, 1634, " As for the Quod-
ling apple slipps, I spake to Mr. Ilumfries once or twice about it and
he sayd he would see for some. I hope he will bring some ouer with
him, and yet I doubt it because it is soe forward in the yeare." 8
George Fenwick of Saybrook, Conn., wrote, Ma}' G, 16-11, "I
haue receaued the trees yow sent me, for which I hartily thanke
yow. If I had any thing hearc that could pleasure yow, yow
should frely command it. I am prettie well stoned with chirrie
& peach trees, & did hope I had had a good nurserie of aples, of
the aples yow sent me last yeare, but the wormes have in a manner
distroyed them all as they came vp. I pray informe me if yow
know any way to preuent the like mischiefe for the future." 4
John Mason, writing from Saybrook, January 28, 1654, prayed
the governor to " forget not to prouide for the planting some trees
at spring." 5 March 5, 1656, he wrote to Mrs. Elizabeth Winthrop,
" I haue sent ten apple trees by Goodman Stobyon to your selfe.
I suppose the}' will, most of them, be planted in the north end of
your orchard. I would haue sent more if I had thought there were
a place to receiue them. I haue alsoe sent Thomas Bayley thirty
grafted trees, as hee desired mee. They are in Goodman Stolyon's
boate. I would entreat you to acquint him with it. Ilee told mee
hee would put it to Mr. Winthrops account. They come to thirty
shillings." 6
The fruit of an apple tree, which, together with an acre of land,
was given to the apostle Eliot by the Indians, was exhibited before
1 Can this have been the "Yellow Sweeting" mentioned above as originated by William
BlackistoiK?
1 Savage's Winthrop, Vol. EI. p. 332. » Ibid., Vol. VII. p. 419.
3 Mass. Hist. Coll., Fourth Series, Vol. VI. p. 499. 8 Ibid., p. 421.
* Ibid., p. 368.
ANCIENT FRUIT TREES. 15
the Massachusetts Horticultural Society in 1833. This tree stood
near the meeting-house in Natick, and was called the Orange
Sweeting, and was a favorite with the Indians. It will be remem-
bered that Eliot deceased in 1G90. Another apple tree, imported
from England, and planted in the garden of the Wyllis family in
Hartford, Conn., before the middle of the seventeenth century,
produced on a few weak limbs at the top of the tree some dozens
of apples in 1822. It was of the Fearmain variety. 1
Other interesting relics are the Orange pear tree in the garden
of Capt. Charles Allen at Salem, supposed to have been planted
about 1640, and other ancient trees of that variety in the same
chy, now or recently living ; the Warden and Messire Jean pears in
the Pickering garden in Salem, the former grafted on the day the
battle of Lexington was fought ; an ancient Apple pear, also in
Salem until 1878 ; 2 the trees of the Black Pear of Worcester, or
Iron pear in Dorchester, said to be more than two centuries old ;
an English Pearmain apple tree in Weathersfield, Conn., brought
from England by William Tryan, now measuring nearly eleven
feet in circumference, having, according to tradition, yielded fruit
nearby a century before the Revolution, and in 1877 still in good
bearing condition ; 8 the original tree of the Pinneo pear, at Co-
lumbia, Conn., reputed to be one hundred and forty years old ; 4 the
original tree in the town of Chelmsford of the pear of the same
name, once valued for its size and beauty, which was a very large
tree before the destructive gale of September, 181G, when it was
much injured ; 5 the row of trees of the Hunt Russet apple on the
old Hunt farm in Concord, Mass., believed to be at least two hun-
dred years old ; 6 and the four healthy trees still remaining of an
apple orchard, planted, probabhy as early as 1770, on the Bacon
farm in Richmond, Mass. 7
A paper in the Philosophical Transactions, 8 by Paul Dudley,
F.R.S., and chief justice of Massachusetts, who resided at Roxbury,
gives a vivid idea of the extent to which the culture of fruit and
vegetables had attained in 1726 ; but he says not a word of flowers.
1 Letter of Hon. John "Welles to Hon. John Lowell in Mass. Agricultural Repository,
Vol. VIII. pp. 2S0, 281.
2 Proceedings of the American Pomological Society for 1875, pp. 101, 102.
s Massachusetts Ploughman, Dec. 15, 1877.
4 American Agriculturist, 1S76, p. 422.
8 Hovey's Magazine, Vol. VI. p. 18.
« Transactions of the Mass. Horticultural Society, Part I. 1875, p. 63.
" Michigan Farmer, Nov. 14, 1S76.
8 Abridgment, Vol. VI. Part II. p. 341.
16 INTRODUCTION.
" The Plants of England, as well those of the Fields and Orchards,
as those of the Garden that have been brought over hither, suit
mighty well with our Soil, and grow here to great Perfection.
" Our Apples arc, without Doubt, as good as those of England,
and much fairer to look to, and so are the Pears, but we have not
got all the Sorts.
" Our Peaches do rather excel those of England, and then we
have not the Trouble or Expence of Walls for them ; for our Peach
Trees are all Standards, and I have had in my own Garden seven
or eight Hundred fine Peaches of the Rare-ripes, growing at a Time
on one Tree.
" Our People, of late Years, have run so much upon Orchards,
that in a village near Boston, consisting of about forty Families,
they made near three Thousand Barrels of Cycler. This was in the
Year 1721. And in another Town, of two Hundred Families, in
the same year I am credibly inform'd, they made near ten Thou-
sand Carrels. Some of our Apple Trees will make six, some have
made seven Barrels of Cyder, but this is not common ; and the
Apples will yield from seven to nine Bushels for a Barrel of Cyder.
A good Apple Tree, with us, will measure from six to ten Foot in
Girt. I have seen a fine Pcarmain, at a Foot from the Ground,
measure ten Feet, and four inches round. This Tree, in one Year,
has borne thirty eight Bushels (by Measure) of as fine Pearmains,
as ever I saw in England. A Kentish Pippin at three Foot from
the Ground, seven Foot in Girt ; a Golden Rossetin six Foot
round. The largest Apple Tree that I could find, was ten Foot
and six Inches round, but this was no Graft.
"An Orange Pear Tree grows the largest and 3-ields the fairest
Fruit. I know one of them near forty Foot high, that measures
six Foot and six Inches in Girt, a Yard from the Ground, and has
borne thirt}- Bushels at a Time ; and this 3'ear I measured an
Orange Pear, that grew in nry own Orchard, of eleven Inches
round the Bulge. I have a Warden Pear Tree, that measures five
Foot six Inches round. One of my Neighbors has a Bergamot
Pear Tree that was brought from England in a Box, about the
Year 1G43, that now measures six Foot about, and has borne
twenty two Bushels of fine Pears in one Year. About twenty
Years since, the Owner took a C3'on, and grafted it upon a common
Hedge Pear ; but the Fruit does not prove altogether so good, and
the Rind or Skin, is thicker than that of the Original.
JUSTICE DUDLEY'S ACCOUNT. 17
" Our Peach Trees are large and fruitful, and bear commonly in
three Years from the Stone. I have one in nry Garden of twelve
Years Growth, that measures two Foot and an Inch in Girt a Yard
from the Ground, which, two Years ago, bore me near a Bushel of
fine Peaches. Our common Cherries are not so good as the Kent-
ish Cherries of England, and we have no Dukes or Heart Cher-
ries, unless in two or three Gardens."
Justice Dudley gave the measurements of several forest trees of
remarkable size, among them a Platanus occidentals, or button-
wood, nine yards in girt. An onion set out for seed would rise to
four feet nine inches, and a parsnip would reach eight feet. He
gave some remarkable instances of the power of vegetation,
including a wonderful crop of pumpkins from a single seed. The
intermixture of the different varieties of Indian corn had been
noticed by the aborigines, and attributed by them " to the Roots
and small Fibres reaching to and communicating with one
another ; " but Dudley was " of Opinion that the Stamina, or Prin-
ciples of this wonderful Copulation or mixing of Colours, are car-
ried by the Wind ; and that the Season of it is, when the Corn is
in the Earing, and while the Milk is in the Grain, for at that Time,
the Corn is in a Sort of Estuation and emits a strong Scent."
He had examined an apple* tree in his own town which bore a
considerable quantity of apples, especially every other year, but
never had a blossom. Probably this was similar to the varie-
ties with petalless flowers known in our own day. It had been
discovered that " molosses " could be made by boiling down the
juice of sweet apples. A summer variety was used, and the
farmers ran much upon planting orchards of this sweeting for
fatting their swine, and assured him that it made the best kind
of pork. 1
"We find, in the first half of the eighteenth century, gardens
attached to the residences of the wealthy citizens of Boston.
When these were situated on the slopes of the various hills, the
ground was shaped into terraces both in front and rear, planted
with shade and fruit trees, and embellished with flowers. The
gardens were laid out in the style then prevalent in England. One
of these estates, on Tremont Street, midway between the entrance
to Pemberton Square and Beacon Street, was the residence of
Gov. Bellingham, and afterwards became the property of Andrew
1 Phil. Trans., Vol. VI. pp. 379, 380.
18 INTRODUCTION.
Faneuil, who erected on it the firsl hothouse in New England. 1
On his decease H passed to his nephew, Peter Faneuil. Perhaps
the finesl of all these estates was thai of Thomas Hancock, whose
mansion, which remained until 1863, was situated west of where
the State House now stands, the grounds including tln.se occupied
by the State House and part of the Reservoir, his nursery being
where is uow Hancock street. The garden was laid out in flower-
beds bordered with box, and planted with fruit trees on espal-
iers, hollies, vews. etc. Later the house and grounds of Gardiner
Greene, who owned the larger portion of Pemberton Hill, which he
greatly improved and beautified, are spoken of as forming alto-
„.,'• the linest private residence in Boston. His greenhouse is
; to have heen the only one existing at the time in Boston.
('.aniens such as are now seen only in the suburbs were then found
in every part of Boston, and many are remembered by men now
living; but, with the increase of population and trade, they have
gradually disappeared. Shade trees were seen everywhere in the
streets; bu1 these also have followed those who planted them.
The English elm trees on Tremont Street, opposite Horticultural
Hall, known from the planter as " Paddock's Mall," were prob-
al.lv set there in 1762. They were cut down in February. 1874,
alter efforts had been made by the Horticultural Society and others
to save them. 8
The name of Old Orchard Beach, in Saco, Me., arose from a
growth of apple trees planted there at a very early period, some
of which remained as late as 1770. A hundred years later the
trunks of two apple trees, very much decayed, but one of them
still bearing fruit, remained at the site of the ancient •• Agamen-
tieiis." or "Gorgeana," in York. This bearing tree stood on
land which was originally the homestead of Thomas Gorges, an
early mayor of Gorgeana. and governor of the Province, who
established himself there ahout 1641. Tradition aver-, that this
tree had been brought over from England in a tub, and planted
where it then stood, more than two hundred years ago. The
house Of Walter Phillips, who was a noted gardener and public
,, Hiccr in the present towns of Newcastle and Edgecomb, was sur-
rounded by an apple orchard. Many other ancient apple, pear,
' Andrew FnnenU c:im< to B «ton ai early .-^ 1709, and died in 1737, bo that this hothouse
n I. uili in the early part of the eighteenth century. — Sargent's Dmiingsicith
, i. Vol ll. pp. 506, .'a-:.
liu.irks of Boston. | •• 888; Atlantic Monthly, Vol. XI. p. 699.
HORTICULTURE IN MAINE. 19
and other trees are mentioned in an interesting History of
Orcharding in Maine in the First Annual Report of the Secre-
tary of the Maine State Pomological Society, from which the
above facts are taken, showing that the first settlers immediately
engaged in the planting of orchards. From the same source we
learn that John North, who came from Ireland about 1730, and
settled in what is now Bristol, not only set out apple trees, but
cultivated a garden ornamented with shrubs and flowers. The
cellar of his house may be seen at the present day, surrounded
by shrubs, the damask rose, primroses, and barberry bushes, and
some very old trees. The ox-eye daisy, or whiteweed, was culti-
vated in the garden, and spread from it over the farms. To Ben-
jamin Vaughan, M.D., LL.D., and his brother Charles Vaughan,
the State of Maine is indebted for early attempts at agricultural
and horticultural improvement. They were Englishmen by birth,
and came to Hallowell in 179G, where they established upon their
farm an extensive garden, a large orchard, and a nursery of fruit
trees, in which not only the common fruits and vegetables, as well
as nut-bearing and ornamental trees, were cultivated, but new
sorts, imported from Europe, were tested, and, if they proved
valuable, disseminated throughout the State, where, especially in
Kennebec County, the good effects of their labors are still to be
seen. Their head gardener, John Hesketh, came to this country
in 1797, having previously been head gardener at Knowesley Hall,
the seat of Lord Derby, and two years later he was employed by
the Vaughans. His knowledge of fruits, plants, and flowers, and
of the principles of landscape gardening, was very thorough for
the time. Dr. Vaughan was a distinguished member of the
Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture, and, under the
signature of " A Kennebec Farmer," contributed largely to its
publications. 1 Very early in the present century Ephraim Goodale
established a nursery for the propagation of trees, undoubtedly the
first in the State, in the present town of Orrington. 2 Dr. Vaughan
and Mr. Goodale were honorary members of the Massachusetts
Horticultural Society.
Besides the pear trees which have come down to us from Govs.
Endicott and Prince of Massachusetts was the well-known tree
1 The Agriculture, Natural History, and Industry of the County of Kennebec, by 8. L.
Boardman.
2 First Annual Report of the Maine State Pomological Society, n. IS.
20 INTRODUCTION".
planted by Gov. Stuyvesant of New Amsterdam in 1G47. It was
a Summer Bonchretien, and one of the oldest grafted trees which
have survived to our day. It is said to have been imported from
Holland. In 1856 it produced a bushel of pears. A description
and woodcut may be found in Harpers' Magazine for May,
L862, when it was but little more than a venerable trunk. It stood
on the corner of Third Avenue and Thirteenth Street. It was
broken down by a dray in the spring of 1866, but afterwards sent
up a sucker from the foot, which grew ten feet high, but probably
proceeded from below the point where the tree was grafted.
Gov. Stuyvesant's garden, or " bouwery," was remarkably fine,
and kept in a high state of cultivation. From fort}- to fifty negro
Blaves, besides a number of white servants, were constantly em-
ployed in the improvement of the gi*ound. Where the road to the
city crossed his property, shade trees were planted on each side. 1
Some cherry trees planted at Yonkers, N.Y., about 1650, by
Frederick Philipse, the founder of that place, were growing there
two hundred 3-cars later. Other cheny trees planted as early, at
Point Pleasant, Bristol, R.I., on the estate of Robert Rogers, also
endured for two centuries. 2
"The pears which we now have," said Mr. Lowell in 1828, 8
" were introduced by the Huguenots, who, on the revocation of the
Edict <>f Nantes, fled to this country. The original trees are in
some instances to be found in the gardens laid out by the Faneuils,
the Johonnots, and others, and nearly all which we now have may
lie traced to them." Mr. Lowell doubtless referred to the "White
Doyenne. St. Germain. Brown Beurre, Yirgouleuse, etc. The revo-
cation of the Edict of Nantes was in 1685. Mr. Prince 4 remarked
in 1831, of the White Doyenne, or St. Michael, that, "in the vicin-
ity of New York and on Long Island, this variety of the pear is
more extensively cultivated than any other, and most of the very
ancient ingrafted trees there met with are of this description, where,
from time immemorial, it has borne the title of the Virgalieu pear.
How this name originated, and whether it was brought by the an-
cient Dutch settlers, or by some of the numerous French emigrants
at the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, it seems impossible now
to determine: siillice it to say that by that title, and corruptions
Vs nistory of the City of New York, Vol. I. pp. 1ST, 215.
' Rep ) of Patents, 1858, p. 298.
• New England Farmer, Vol. VU. p. 121.
« l'miiological Manual, Part I. p. 4.3.
FKUIT IN VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND. 21
thereof, it has been solely known in the localities referred to, from
the remotest period of its probable introduction." It is probable
that Mr. Lowell's view is correct, and that the White Doyenne was
introduced by the Huguenots, who in 1689 settled New Rochelle.
The culture of the vine with the view of wine-making was early
undertaken in Virginia, French vine-dressers having been brought
over in 1621, who wrote to the English Company, that the soil and
climate of Virginia surpassed that of Languedoc, and afterwards
made a successful experiment in the production of wine, a speci-
men of which was sent to England. 1
The common apple was grafted on wild stocks in Virginia in
1647. The same year, twenty butts of cider were made in that
Colony by Richard Bennet. Wine was also made in Virginia, by a
Capt. Brocas, in 1647, and in 1651 premiums were offered for its
production. As early as 1722 there were vineyards which pro-
i duced seven hundred and fifty gallons a j^ear. Many other attempts
were made, soon after the settlement of the country, to produce
wine, one of which, by English settlers at Uvedalo (now in Dela-
ware), seems to have met with some success. An attempt to
i establish a vineyard near Philadelphia was made by William Penn
i in 1683, and another by Andrew Dore in 1685 ; but neither suc-
i ceeded. The peach, nectarine, and apricot are mentioned as grow-
ing abundantly in Virginia in 1720. Some of the peaches are rep-
i resented to have been twelve or thirteen inches in circumference.
They were raised so easily as to be planted for feeding hogs, and
also for making brandy. Quinces also grew there in perfection at
the same time. The peach and pear were introduced by George
IRobbins at "Peach Blossom Plantation," Easton, Talbot County,
Md., about 1735, the seeds having been received from Peter Col-
llinson of London. A codling apple tree, sent by Charles, Lord
I Baltimore, to his son Benedict Calvert, about the middle of the
; eighteenth century, stood for a hundred 3'ears in full vigor at
! Mount Airy, Prince George's Coum^y, Md. 2
The author of the Introductory Essa} r and Notes to Wood's
! New-England's Prospect (third edition, 1764) says, "The late
I Col. Tasker of Maryland in one }'ear made more than twenty hogs-
heads of wine from the Burgundy grape, which by good judges
fwere thought equal to the product of France."
1 Holmes's American Annals, first edition, 1805, Vol. I. p. 224.
2 Keport of U. S. Commissioner of Patents, 1853, pp. 260-297.
22 INTRODUCTION.
The French settlers who arc traditionally placed at Kaskaskia
and Cahokia, 111., about 1G83 or 1GS5, gave attention to horti-
culture, proofs of which are still seen in the venerable pear trees,
of enormous size, that survive on the sites of their settlements.
Though most of the original trees are gone, there are many of the
second generation scattered along the Mississippi and Wabash
river towns. These old French pear trees were very hardy, and
never blighted. The houses of the settlers were generally placed
in gardens surrounded by apple, pear, peach, and cherry trees, and
they also gave attention to the cultivation of garden vegetables. 1
A BtriMng feature of the landscape on the banks of the Detroit
River, near the city of the same name, is the gigantic pear trees,
probably planted :is soon as the first permanent settlements were
made by the French, — about a century and a half ago. A bole
.six feet in girth and a height of sixty feet are common; and many
show a circumference of eight to nine feet, and rear their heads
seventy and sometimes eighty feet from the earth. They bear
uniform crops; thirty to fifty bushels being often the annual prod-
uct of :i single tree. The fruit is of medium size, ripening about
the end of August, ei'isp. juicy, and spicy, and though, as a table
fruit, surpassed by many sorts, it still holds a fair rank, and, for
stewing and preserving, i- unite unrivalled. Individual trees differ
a little in the time of ripening and the size and flavor of the fruit;
but the variety is well characterized. Nearly every one of the old
homesteads possessed a tree; some, two or three: few exceeded
half a dozen. Such was the size and productiveness of these trees,
that a single one usually nave an ample supply for the wants of a
family. Tradition reports that these trees were obtained from
Montreal, to which place they were brought from Normandy or
Provence: Put the fruit has not been identified with any known
French variety. Trees of the same variety are found at other
places in the vicinity. One of those at Monroe is twelve feet in
circumference. Another legend among the French habitants of
Detroit is to the eflfecl that an emigri from France brought over
three pear seeds in his vest pocket, which were planted on the
hanks of the Detroit River, and became the parents, by means of
sprouts :is well ;is seeds, of these venerable trees. One of the
oMest. which stood until a recent period, is known to have been
planted as early as 1 705.
1 Tnuuacttoni "t' the Ulinoia Horticultural Society, Vol. X., New Series, p. 125; Country
Gentleman, Sept 26, 1879.
FRUIT TREES ES" MICHIGAN. 23
Many of the farms which were closely crowded on the banks of
the Detroit River had orchards of several hundred apple, cherry,
and pear trees, among which were the Red and White Calvilles,
the Detroit Red, the Pomme de Neige or Fameuse, the Pomme
Grise, Russets, Pearmains, and other apples not so well known.
But, while the pear trees flourish in a green old age, the apple
orchards are fast disappearing, and it is probable that even the
pear trees, which belong to the old habitants of Detroit, will perish
with them and their homesteads, and that another half-century will
see the last of those magnificent trees. 1
. Tradition says that some of the early French missionaries
brought pear seeds, scions, and trees from Normancly as early as
1749. The apple orchards have not been traced farther back than
1749. A portion of the varieties are of Canadian origin, and indi-
cate that the collections were brought from that province. Some of
the apple trees at Detroit were grafted by Capt. Cowan, who com-
manded a small vessel on the lakes, and had been gardener to Gen.
Washington previously to 1789. The settlers of Michigan, after its
organization as a Territory in 1805, found here and there about the
State orchards of seedling apple trees planted by the Indians,
which, though of great age, were healthy and productive. About
1825 Gov. William Woodbridge planted two thousand apple trees
and some pear trees on his farm, now part of the city of Detroit.
The first peach tree at St. Joseph, where that fruit is now so suc-
cessfully cultivated, was raised from the pit by Mr. Burnett, the
Indian trader, who came there about 1775. The settlers in 1829
found peach trees growing there, and, as soon as they had made
their clearings, they planted apple and peach seeds. 2
William Penn, writing on the lGth of the 8th month, 1683, after
mentioning the mulberries, chestnuts, walnuts, plums, strawberries,
cranberries, whortleberries, and grapes growing naturally in the
woods, said there were also very good peaches ; not an Indian
plantation was without them. He thought they were not inferior
to any peach in England, except the true Newington. He ques-
tioned whether it was best to attempt to improve the fruits of the
country, especially the grape, by the care and skill of art, or to
send for foreign stems and sets, already good and approved. It
1 Paper read by Bela Hubbard before the Detroit Pioneer Society; Letter of John C.
Holmes; Report of the Michigan Pomological Society, 1878, p. 174.
2 Reports of the Michigan Pom. Soc, 1872, 1873, 1878.
24 INTRODUCTION.
seemed to him most reasonable to believe not only that a thing
grows best where it grows naturally, but that it would hardly be
equalled by another of the same kind not naturally growing there;
bul In' intended to try both. At about the same time, Mahlon
Stacy, writing from Jersey, said, " We have peaches by cart-
loads." Aboul the year 1700, the whole street, of a mile in
length, in Germantown, was fronted with blooming peach trees. 1
The Bartram Botanic Garden, near the city of Philadelphia,
begun in 1728 by John Bartram, who was pronounced by Linnaeus
the besl natural botanist known, was the first garden of the kind
in America. Here grew the trees and plants collected by Bartram
in his botanical explorations, which extended over nearly all the
United States then known, — from Lake Ontario in the north to the
Bource of the St. John's River in Florida, — and here still flourish a
greater variety and finer specimens of our indigenous trees than
can probably be found grouped together in any other place of the
Bame size: the most prominent being a deciduous cypress (Taxo-
dium distichum) twenty feet in circumference and one hundred
and twenty-live feet high. The original tree of the Petre'pear,
raised by Bartram from seed sent him by Lady Petre, and which
first bore fruit in 17(5.'!, stands near the house which Bartram built
of stone with his own hands. A seat under an Ohio buckeye
i ZEsculus pavia), around wdiich once twined a luxuriant Tecoma,
or trumpet creeper, was a favorite resort of Washington while he
lived in Philadelphia. -
The Bartram garden was continued by the sons of its founder,
John and "William, and afterwards occupied by Col. Robert Carr
(whose wife Anne was a daughter of the younger John) as a
nursery. About 1807 Francois Andre Michaux resided here, and
studied the collection of trees and shrubs. More fortunate than
the majority of such establishments, it is now in the possession
of Andrew M. Eastwick, who preserves its original appearance,
as far as possible, as a monument to the taste and industry of our
first native botanist. 8
Bartram was a member of the Royal Societies of London and
Stockholm.'' and his correspondence extended to the most distin-
Lnoalaof Philadelphia, ed. 1S4-1, Vol. I. pp. 17, 46, Vol. II. p. 46.
' Horticulturist, Vol. V. p. 263, Vol. X. p. 871, Vol. XI. p. 79.
■ Mi-. Baatwick
England in -'great quantities." The crop of the
previous year had failed in England, owing to an unfavorable
spring; but the American apples were found an admirable substi-
tute, though they were too expensive for common eating, being
sold for two. three, and even four pence each. Their flavor was,
however, said to be superior to any thing that could be produced in
England, and even to that of the apples of Italy. -
The next botanical garden, after that of Bartram, was estab-
lished in 177.'!. by his cousin, Humphry Marshall, at West Brad-
ford. Chester County. lYnn., where he soon collected all the most
interesting trees of our country, together with many native herba-
ceous plants and man} 1 curious exotics, a large portion of which
\et survive. Many of the oaks, pines, and magnolias have at-
tained to a majestic altitude. Like Bartram, he corresponded and
exchanged with European cultivators, one of whom, Dr. Thomas
Parke, wrote to him on the 29th of April, 1795, desiring a collec-
tion of seeds of American foresl trees for Sir John Menzies of
Scotland, and also a small assortment of apples, pears, and
peaches, of the besl grafted or inoculated kinds, in trees of two or
three years old. It excites some surprise to learn that a sufficient
number of American varieties of these fruits existed at that time
to constitute even a small assortment.'
Marshall's example was followed by his friend and neighbor,
John .lacks,. n. who in the year 1777 commenced a highly interest-
ing collection of plants at his resi
' Ibid., p. 456. Apples wire exported In 1741 from New England to the West Indies in
considerable abundance. — Report of V. s. Oommiationer of Palenis, 1S53, p. "260.
3 DarlingtunV kfemoriala, pp. 23,
GAEDENING IN THE SOUTHEEN STATES. 27
by tasteful culture and planting, and produced an arboretum of
evergreens and other elegant forest trees probably not surpassed at
the time in the United States. 1
Another of Bartram's friends was James Logan, one of the
primitive fathers of Pennsylvania, who came to America, in com-
pany with William Penn, in 1G99. He published in 1735 an
account of his experiments and observations on Indian corn, which
were very remarkable for that da}', in support of the Linnaean
doctrine of the sexes of plants. At his estate, " Stenton," near
Germantown, he planted, about 1730, a grand avenue of the hem-
lock spruce, which has remained to the present day. 2
John Bartram's son William, who had accompanied his father in
many of his journeys, set out in 1773 on a botanical exploration
of the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida, his travels extending west
to the Mississippi River. In the course of these explorations,
which continued through five years, he made many interesting ob-
servations on the horticulture of the European settlers and of the
Indians. Near Charleston, S.C., he noticed a large plantation of
the European mulberry (Moras alba) , some of which were grafted
on the native mulberry (Moras rubra) for the purpose of feeding
silk-worms. Near Savannah he found the garden of the Hon.
Jonathan Byram furnished with a variety of fruit trees and flower-
ing shrubs. At Frederica, the first town built by the English in
Georgia, peach, fig, pomegranate, and other trees and shrubs, were
growing out of the ruins. On the banks of the St. John's River,
in Florida, he saw many large and flourishing orange groves, the
descendants of the trees introduced by the early Spanish settlers.
Man} T other fine groves had been exterminated to make room for
the cultivation of indigo, cotton, corn, and sweet potatoes. At
the confluence of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers, in Alabama,
he saw several large apple trees, planted by the French, which
were in a very thriving condition. In a garden at Mobile, the
Dioscorea bulbifera was cultivated for its edible roots. At Pearl
Island, near New Orleans, Bartram found peaches, figs, grapes,
plums, and other fruits, in the utmost degree of perfection ; and at
a plantation on the Mississippi, near Baton Rouge, he observed,
in a spacious garden, many useful and curious exotics, particu-
larly the tuberose, which grew from five to seven feet high in the
open ground, the flowers being very large and abundant.
1 Darlington's Memorials, p. 22.
2 Ibid., pp. 21, 307; Downing's Landscape Gardening, sixth ed., p. 43.
28 INTRODUCTION.
Atone Indian village, Bartram noticed a cultivated plantation of
the Bhellbark hickory, the trees thriving, and bearing better than
those left to nature; and at another village he saw a carefully
pruned orange grove, besides plantations of maize, sweet potatoes,
beans, and other legumes, pumpkins, squashes, melons, and other
I cucurbitacese, and tobacco. Around other deserted villages were
growing plum, peach, and fig trees. A favorite situation for their
towns was on a peninsula formed by the bend of a river, or at the
junction of two rivers, which generally comprised a sufficient body
of land suited to their crops ; but, when this was not the case, they
chose a fertile spot in the most convenient place. Bartram passed
nearly two miles through a plantation of corn and beans, which was
well cultivated, ami kept clear of weeds. 1 The peach described by
Coxc as the Columbia was so largely cultivated by the Indians in
the Carolinas and Georgia as to have received the name of Indian
peach. It reproduces itself from seeds.
Peach and (jiiince trees were killed by frost in the Province of
New York in 1 7:57 ; but the apple and pear trees were not hurt by
the cold. In 17G8 the Society for Promoting Arts, at New York,
awarded a premium of ten pounds to Thomas Young of Oyster
Bay. for the largest nursery of apple trees, the number being
27,123. s
The Linnsean Botanic Garden at Flushing, L.I., was founded
about the middle of the last centuiy, by "William Prince, and was
continued by three generations of his descendants. The Messrs.
Prince were unwearied in their endeavors to procure all foreign
and native plants, and for many years this was the most extensive
nursery establishment in the country. The collection of grapes,
both European and native, was very large : the American plants
were numerous ami various, including splendid specimens of mag-
nolias and other forest trees. Here were made some of the ear-
liest attempts to produce improved varieties of fruit from seed in
this country. In 1827 the nurseries contained more than a hun-
dred species of Australian plants, among which were two of Eu-
calyptus and several Banksias. In 1828 the}' covered an extent of
thirty acres, the collection of roses occupying an acre, and includ-
ing more than sis hundred different kinds.' 5 William Robert Prince,
1 Trawls through North iind South Carolina, Georgia, East and West Florida, etc.
1 Report of r. s. ( tanmlMlonei <>f PfcteaU, is.'.ij, pp. 861, 284.
' Loudon's Gardener's Magazine, Vol. IU. p. 466, Vol. VIII. p. 2S0; New England
Farmer, Vol. V. p. --'I, Vol. VII. p. 25.
GARDENING IN SOUTH CAROLINA. 29
of the third generation, who was at the head of the establishment
for many years, was widely known in the horticultural world as a
man of remarkable enterprise, indefatigable in his exertions for
the introduction of new plants, and as a man of extensive reading
and a forcible writer. He was the author of a Treatise on the
Vine (New York, 1830) and a Pomological Manual (New York,
1831), in both which he was assisted by his father, the second
William Prince, who also wrote a Treatise on Horticulture (New
York, 1828). Mr. Prince dedicated his Pomological Manual to
the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, of which he was a cor-
responding, and his father an honorary member.
The first person who cultivated a garden on a large scale in
Charleston, S.C., was Mrs. Lamboll. About the middle of the
last centurj' her garden was richly stored with flowers and other
curiosities of nature, as well as useful vegetables. She was fol-
lowed by Mrs. Martha Logan and Mrs. Hopton, the former of
whom, when seventy 3-ears old, wrote a treatise on gardening
called the Gardener's Kalendar, which was published after her
death in 1779, and as late as 1808 regulated the practice of gar-
dening in and near Charleston. She was a great florist, and
uncommonly fond of a garden.
About 1755 Henry Laurens purchased a lot in Ansonborough,
afterwards called Laurens Square, and enriched it with every thing
useful or ornamental that Carolina produced, or his extensive mer-
cantile connections enabled him to procure. He introduced olives,
capers, limes, ginger, Guinea-grass, the Alpine ever-bearing straw-
berry, red raspberries, and blue grapes; also, from the south of
France, apples, pears, plums, and the white Chasselas grape, the
latter of which bore abundantl}'. The fruit raised from the olive
trees was prepared and pickled to equal those imported. His gar-
den was superintended with maternal care by Mrs. Elinor Laurens,
with the assistance of John Watson, a complete English gardener.
Watson soon after formed a spacious garden for himself, and estab-
lished the first nurser}' in South Carolina. His garden was laid
waste during the Revolution, but afterwards revived by himself
and his descendants. Robert Squib followed him, and, as well as
Watson, introduced many of the native productions of the State
into Europe. Squib was also the author of a Gardener's Kalen-
dar. Andre Michaux, who was sent out by the French Govern-
ment in 178G to collect plants, established a botanic garden about
ten miles from Charleston.
30 INTRODUCTION.
One of tlif finest gardens near Charleston in 1808 was that of
Charles Drayton at St. Andrews. It contained many valuable
exotics; but t ho principal ofTort of the proprietor was to make a
concentrated display of the botanic riches of the State, in which
he was very successful. His garden was arranged with exquisite
taste. Another garden was formed by William Williamson at St.
Paul's, and afterwards owned by John Champneys. The exten-
sive pleasure grounds were planted with every species of flowering
trees and shrubs, native and foreign, and another part contained
a greal number of fruit trees, especially pecan nuts and pear trees.
The Melia Azedarach, or Pride of India tree, was introduced by
Thomas Lamboll. 1
New Smyrna, in Florida, was founded in 1763 by Dr. Andrew
Turnbull, who carried thither a colon}' of fifteen hundred Greeks,
Italians, and Minor cans. His main object was the production of
BUgar and indigo ; but the vine, fig, pomegranate, olive, orange, and
other tropical fruits were planted, and some of the old fig and
olive trees still remain. One of the varieties of orange introduced
by him was of such excellence that it is still cultivated as the
Turnbull orange. In St. Augustine there was a garden-lot to each
house, most commonly stocked with orange and fig trees, inter-
spersed with grape vines and flowers. The pomegranate, pine-
apple, papaw. plantain, olive, orange, and most of the exotic and
indigenous plants common to the tropics and the Middle States,
were cultivated in the garden attached to the Government House.
The Island of Anastatia, opposite St. Augustine, was remarkable
for date. and olive trees, and for the fine quality of the oranges
grown there. The orange, fig, peach, pomegranate, and other fruit
trees, were also produced at Pensacola. 2
The barberry was early introduced into the gardens of New Eng-
land, and increased so rapidly, that in 175-4 the Province of Massa-
chusetts passed an act to prevent damage to English grain arising
from barberry bushes in the vicinity of grain fields. 8
Us earrj as L762 the scarcity of corn in New England led to the
inquiry whether some foreign vegetable might not be introduced
which would serve as a substitute for bread. The subject was fully
discussed, and, as a consequence, potatoes were soon after largely
■ l.'.imwiy - * EQatory of South Carolina, cd. 1858, Vol. II. pp. 128, 129, 193.
' Forbea'l Sketchet of the Floridas, pp. 85-91, 178; Letters of Edmund n. Hart and
w B, II. nt.
3 Acta and Resolves of the Province of Massachusetts Bay, Vol. m. p. 797.
GEORGE HEUSLER. 31
and successfully cultivated. 1 The potato is said to have been in-
troduced into this country Ijv a colony of Presbyterian Irish, who
settled in Londonderry, N.IL, in 1719 ; but its cultivation did not
become general for many 3-ears. 2
The variety of maize known as sweet corn was found by the offi-
cers attached to the expedition of Gen. Sullivan, sent against the
Indians in the Genesee country, in 1779, and brought to Connecti-
cut, whence it proceeded south. 3 Another account 4 is, that it was
introduced into Massachusetts, from the country of the Susque-
hannah, by Capt. Richard Bagnol of Plymouth, on his return
from Sullivan's expedition. Whatever the truth of these reports,
there is no doubt that the Six Nations, against which Sullivan's
expedition was directed, had made much progress in agriculture,
and cultivated not only large fields of corn, but fine gardens of
beans, pease, turnips, cabbages, melons, carrots, parsnips, and
potatoes. At one village of the Indians the corn fields comprised
two hundred acres. The apple and peach orchards were very
extensive : at one village an orchard of fifteen hundred fruit trees
was destroyed, and, at another, fifteen hundred peach trees alone. 5
In 1769 Benjamin Coates of Salem advertised garden seeds, im-
ported from London, for sale. Susanna Renken of Boston gave a
similar notice at the same time. 6
The first regularly educated gardener of whom we have any
account in this vicinity was George Ileusler, a native of Landau in
the Province of Alsace, Germany. He had been employed in the
gardens of several German princes and of the King of Holland,
and came from Amsterdam to this country in 1780, bringing pro-
fessional diplomas and recommendations. Soon after his arrival,
he commenced the practice of his profession in the employment of
John Tracy of Newburyport. In 1790 he removed to Salem, and
continued his vocation on the farm of Elias Haskett Derby in
Danvers (now Peabody), and in many of the gardens of Salem,
Danvers, and other towns of Essex County, until nearly the time of
his decease, which occurred April 3, 1817, at the age of sixty-six
3-ears. As early as 1796 he gave notice that he had choice fruit
trees for sale at the farm of Mr. Derby. The latter gentleman had,
1 Felt's Annals of Salem, Vol. n. p. 146.
2 Horticultural Register, Vol. III. p. 214.
3 Loudon's Gardener's Magazine, Vol. VI. p. 483.
* Transactions of the New York State Agricultural Society for 1848, p. 836.
5 Addresses by Rev. David Craft at the Centennial Anniversary of Sullivan's Expedition.
6 Felt's Aunals of Salem, Vol. II. p. 145.
32 INTRODUCTION".
just before, imported valuable trees from India and Africa, and
had a very extensive nursery of useful plants in the neighborhood
of his garden. Mr. Eeusler was highly esteemed as an intelligent,
upright, kind-hearted, and religious man; and to him the commu-
nity are largely indebted for the introduction of main- valuable
fruits, and for developing a taste for gardening. 1 A bill of Mr.
Heusler's to Nathaniel Silsbee of Salem will give some idea of
the trees planted in 1799, It is for six plum trees, two each of
Semiana, Imperatrice, and Bonum Magnum; twelve peach trees,
three each of Brattal's White. Early Purple, Red Magdalen, and
Noblesse; three apricots; twelve Lombardy poplars; and twelve
large-leaf poplars. The number of poplars will surprise those who
do not recollect the long rows of the Lombard}' poplar, some rem-
nants of which survived less than a generation since, and which
were planted when it was a favorite above all other ornamental
trees. The price of the trees was two shillings (thirty-three and
one-third cents) each. 2
With the successful close of the American Revolution, the arts
of peace had opportunity to flourish with new vigor. In the ad-
vancement of horticulture, Washington set the example. lie was
not only a practical farmer on the most extensive scale, but his
nee exhibited every mark of the cultivated and refined
country gentleman. He appears to have had considerable taste in
ornamental gardening. He planted a flower garden, and decorated
his pleasure grounds with much effect ; and his diary shows that
he collected and planted a variety of rare trees and shrubs with his
own hands, and watched their growth with the greatest interest.
He employed skilful gardeners, and pruning was one of his favorite
exercises. 8
A- <»ne of the results of the cessation from war, in 1785 the first
step for the advancement of agriculture by associated effort was
taken. The Philadelphia Society for Promoting Agriculture, and
tin' Agricultural Society of South Carolina, both formed in 1785
(tin 1 latter incorporated in 1705), are still in existence. The
Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agriculture, incorporated
March 7. 1792, lias exerted an active and useful influence on horti-
culture. Among its members we find the first men of the State in
i Bulletin <>f Che Essex Institute, Vol. n. p. 22; Felt's Annals of Salem, Vol. n. p. 147.
* Pi f the Essex Institute, Vol. II. p. 174.
» nortli'uhurist, Vol. II. p. 237; Irving's Life of "Washington, Vol. IV. pp. 455, 404,
MT.408.
KEKRICK'S NURSERY. 33
the various professions ; such as John Lowell, who was its presi-
dent from 1796 to 1804 ; his son, of the same name, who was presi-
dent from 1823 to 1827, and was styled by Gen. Dearborn "the
Columella of the Northern States ; " Thomas L. Winthrop ; Fisher
Ames ; Timothy Pickering, previously secretary of the Philadelphia
Society for Promoting Agriculture; George Cabot; Theodore
Lyman; 8. Parker, D.D. ; John Welles; Caleb Strong, who was
president from 1802 to 1805 ; John Adams, president from 1805 to
1812 ; James Bowdoiu ; Elbridge Gerry ; Joseph B. Varnum ; and
John Hancock. The Massachusetts Agricultural Repository, a
periodical devoted to agriculture, and the first of the kind in the
country, was commenced by this society in 1793. John Lowell,
and other persons of equal eminence, and possessing a similar love
for the cultivation of the soil, were constant or occasional con-
tributors. 1 Even in the earlier years of this publication a portion
of the articles were upon horticulture, though it was not until 1821
that a regular and urgent notice was taken in its pages of that
branch of agriculture. 2 Among the leading writers on horticul-
ture in the Repository were John Lowell, Timothy Pickering,
John Welles, and John Prince. After the establishment of the
New England Farmer, the publication of the Repository was dis-
continued.
In 1790 John Kenrick commenced his horticultural improve-
ments at Newton by planting a quantity of peach stones. He
was acquainted with the process of grafting ; but the method of
propagating by inoculation was unknown to him, and the trees for
his orchard were planted in their natural state. About four years
later, having learned to bud, he began a commercial nursery,
adding apples, cherries, and other fruit trees to his stock. About
1797 he commenced a nursery of ornamental trees, two acres being
appropriated to the Lombard}' poplar, — the most salable tree at
that time in this part of the country. Extending his assortment,
as opportunity offered, by collecting all that could be procured
from the gardens in the neighborhood of Boston, his nurseries
finally became the most extensive, probably, of any in New Eng-
land. In 1823 Mr. Kenrick associated with him his elder son,
William, as we find from an advertisement in the New England
Farmer of October 4 of that year. They offered a general assort-
1 Trans, of the Maes. Society for Promoting Agriculture, New Series, Vol. I.
* Trans, of the Mass. Hort. Soc, 1842, p. 25.
34 INTRODUCTION.
ment of fruit and ornamental trees, especially budded peach trees,
of which the nursery was said to lie the finest in America, consist-
ing of a choice collection of thirty of the best kinds for market or
garden culture. Red currant bushes were also extensively culti-
vated, being offered by the dozen, hundred, or thousand. In 1823
tiny made seventeen hundred gallons of currant wine ; in 1825,
three thousand gallons, and. in 1S2G, thirty-six hundred gallons. 1
Mr. Kenrick continued in this business until his decease, in 1833.
The old mansion in which he dwelt is believed to have been built
in 1720, and it still promises to do good service for another century.
His younger son, John A. Kenrick, continued the nursery business,
and occupied the paternal mansion, until his death, in 1870. The
grounds contain many choice specimen trees, among which is one
of the finest weeping beeches in the country. William Kenrick's
nursery at Nbnantum Hill, in Newton, established in 1823, con-
tinued for twenty-seven years. During a part of this period Mr.
Kenrick imported and disposed of more fruit trees, probably, than
any other nurseryman in New England, besides a large number of
ornamental trees. 2
The seed establishment of David Landreth & Son, at Phila-
delphia, was founded by David Landreth, father of the present
senior partner. He came from England to this country in 1784,
and commenced growing seed soon after; being one of the first,
if not the very first, to enter upon that work as a business in this
country. Instead of the small tract of thirteen acres which he
originally occupied, fifteen hundred acres are now cultivated under
the personal supervision of the firm. For many years, the nursery
business was carried on in connection with the seed business, the
grounds being on Federal Street, about two miles from the centre
of the city. The earliest collection of camellias in America was
made by the Messrs. Landreth: and their collections of valuable
plants and fruits, both native and foreign, were among the most
extensive of their time. To them the city of Philadelphia is
largely indebted for the early development of horticultural taste. 8
i Tlic currant appears to have been extensively grown by others for wine : for in 1824 E.
( Sopelond, jun., of Boston, advertised < troBeille wine, made by I>r. Benjamin Dyer of Provi-
who cultivated In one field forty-five acres of currants. In 1826, however, we are
Informed thai Moure Dyer & Co., who had previously manufactured currant wine in large
quantities, had relinquished the business on account of the high price of sugar.
Lor of John A. Kenrick to Joseph Brock, in 1S61; New England Farmer, Vol. IL
8; Vol. V. p
ndreth'a Rural Register and Alumnae, 1873 and 1S74; Johnson's Dictionary of
Gardening, Am. ed., p. i".7 ; Qovej '- Magazine, Vol. I. p. 202.
COXE AND HAMILTON. 35
William Coxe of Burlington, N.J., was the pioneer pomologist
of America. His orchards, especially of the apple, were very
extensive, and he introduced into his collection all the best varie-
ties of fruit from all parts of the United States, as well as from
England and France. He was acquainted with the works of the
leading pomological writers of Europe ; and his own work, a
View of the Cultivation of Fruit Trees, and the Management of
Orchards and Cider, etc., the first American book on pomology,
is very accurate, and still an authority among pomologists. From
the record which it contains of his experiments in planting or-
chards, we learn that they were begun as early as 1794. Although
it treats only of apples, pears, peaches, plums, and cherries, it
would appear, from an article contributed by him to the American
Farmer, in July, 1828, l that he was acquainted with many varie-
ties of grapes, both native and foreign, and had been very suc-
cessful in grafting delicate foreign grapes, and superior varieties
of our domestic grapes, on the more vigorous stocks of cultivated
vines, or on the native vines of our fields. He engaged in the
nursery business in connection with a partner, Daniel Smith, to
whom he soon wholly relinquished it. 2
William Hamilton of Philadelphia was long well known to the
lovers of nature for his exertions in cultivating rare and beautiful
plants at his elegant residence, "The Woodlands." During a
tour in Europe he collected many curious exotics, which he brought
home with him : among others that once favorite tree, the Lom-
bardy poplar, was introduced b}~ him in 1784. As early as 1800
this garden was extremely rich in all the fine species procurable
either in Europe or the West Indies, and particularly so in rare
and new American species. The Agave Americana flowered here
in 1804. 8 Frederick Pursh, the author of the Flora Americas Sep-
tentrionalis, was gardener here from 1802 to 1805, and here made
his first collections of American plants. In 1828 the collection
was broken up by the sale of the large specimen orange, lemon,
and other trees; and since 1833 "The Woodlands" has been
devoted to the sacred purpose of a cemetery. 4
Near the close of the last century, John Adlum of Georgetown,
1 Reprinted in the New England Farmer, Vol. VII. p. 34
2 Horticulturist, Vol. XI. p. 304.
3 It had bloomed in a garden in Charleston, S.C., in 1763.
4 Darlington's Memorials, p. 577; Hovey's Magazine, Vol. m. p. 4; Loudon's Gardener's
Magazine, Vol. VII. p. 455; Preface to Flora America Septentrionalis, p. viii.
INTRODUCTION.
]).('.. began planting vines with the intent to make wine. His
vineyard was situated on the banks of Rock Creek, where he col-
lect, id many foreign and native varieties of grapes. He published
in 1823 a Memoir on the Cultivation of the Vine in America,
and the Best Mode of Making Wine, of which a second edition
appeared in 1828. After expending much time and money in un-
successful attempts to propagate the foreign grape, he abandoned
it for the native varieties. Among these the since widely known
Catawba, which he found in Maryland, and introduced to public
notice, was his favorite. 1
The French and Spanish settlers of Missouri brought with them
grapes and other fruits, which were thence disseminated in Illinois.
The settlers of Kentucky, from Virginia and the Carolinas, and
those of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, from New England and the
Middle States, in the latter part of the eighteenth and the beginning
of the nineteenth centuries, carried with them the seeds of the dif-
ferent kinds of fruits, grains, and vegetables they were accustomed
to at home, prominent among them being the apple, peach, pear,
and cherry, which were at first sown in garden-patches to be trans-
planted in a year or two into the first few acres cleared. The
soil and climate were congenial. The trees grew thriftily, and in a
very few years yielded fruit. The favorite varieties were intro-
duced as early as possible b} f grafting, and, after the planting of
orchards, nurseries were established for the dissemination of the
varieties. A method of propagating desirable kinds much used by
emigrants from the South and "West was b}" suckers. Peaches were
raised abundantly from seed, and cultivated without grafting or
budding. The pear-blight, and the bitter-rot in the apple, appeared
about 1820, and the peach also began to be diseased about the
same time. As in the East, we find here few traces of ornamental
horticulture among the early settlers. But it was not wholly neg-
lected ; for a damask rose bush was living in 1859, which was
brought from New Orleans more than a century before that time,
and was the first rose bush that ever bloomed in Illinois.
In 17G9 the French settlers on the Illinois River made upwards
of one hundred hogsheads of strong wine from the wild grape. 2
In 1799 an association was established near Lexington, Ky., for
the purpose of cultivating the grape, and manufacturing wine.
1 Memoir; Xtw Engltod Farmer, Vol. II. p. 277.
* Report of U. 8. Commissioner of Tatcnts, 1853, p. 298.
FRUIT CULTURE IN THE WEST. 37
The leader of this enterprise was John James Dufour, a native of
Switzerland, — a man remarkable for intelligence, industry, and
zeal in the cultivation of fruit. With much labor he gathered about
thirty-five varieties of grapes, and a choice and valuable collection
of other fruits. He established a nurser}*, and stimulated a taste
for the improvement and cultivation of fruit. The wine-making
enterprise, like all others depending on foreign grapes, was unsuc-
cessful, and the little band of cultivators was broken up. They
afterwards joined themselves to another colony of their country-
men, who had commenced the cultivation of the vine at Vevay,
Ind., in 1802, but met with so little success that they were forced
to abandon it. These abortive attempts, as well as those of the
French settler, Meneusier, at Cincinnati, attracted the attention of
Nicholas Longworth of the last-named cit}', who took much inter-
est in horticulture, and who, with the aid of his German tenants,
attempted the cultivation of the grape, but with little satisfaction,
until, about 1820, he noticed an account of the Catawba, of which
he immediately procured plants from Major Adlum. His success
with this variety, and the impetus which it gave to the cultivation
and improvement of the native grape in the United States, are too
well known to need recapitulation here.
The Roxbury Russet apple was introduced into Ohio, in 1796,
by Israel and Aaron Waldow Putnam, who got the scions from
their father, Gen. Israel Putnam, at Pomfret, Conn. It was culti-
vated under the name of Putnam Russet, and was for many years
without a rival as a market fruit in Ohio, whole orchards being
planted with it. The settlers from North Carolina brought the
Rawles' Janet or Neverfail, the Horse, and Limber Twig.
Among other interesting evidences of the early interest in horti-
culture in the West was the largest pear tree on record, known
from the name of the owner, Mr. Ockletree. It was a seedling,
brought from Pittsburg, Penn., in 1804, and planted near Vin-
cennes, Ind. In 1837 it produced one hundred and forty bushels
of pears, the largest crop recorded from it. In 1855 it meas-
ured ten and one-half feet in circumference at the smallest place
below the limbs, seventy-five feet across the top, and sixty-five
feet in height. In 1867 it was split down by a tornado, and
seven or eight years later the trunk also died. The fruit was of
inferior quality.
Silas Wharton, a native of Bucks County, Penn., and an ac«
38 INTRODUCTION".
quaintance of William Coxe the pomologist, emigrated to Waynes-
villr. 0., in 1810, and established a nursery there. He procured
from Coxe and Smith a large variety of fruit; his catalogue in
1824 containing the names of ninet3*-two apples and fifty-eight
pears. To him, more than to any other person, the neighborhood
of Dayton is indebted for the introduction of fine fruit. Others
of the more prominent pioneers of horticulture in the West were
Zebulon G-illett of Lawrence County, O., Lewis Sanders of Grass-
hills, Ky., Joseph Curtis of Edgar County, 111. (the inventor of
root-grafting), Dr. Samuel P. Ilildreth of Marietta, 0., and Dr.
Jared P. Kirtland of Cleveland, who gave special attention to the
improvement of the cherry, which he commenced previously to the
year 1X24. ' Dr. Ilildreth and Dr. Kirtland were honorary mem-
bers of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society.
An eccentric character, commonly known as " Johnny Apple-
seed." I nit whose real name was John Chapman, a native of New
England, was the first to propagate fruit trees in North-western
Pennsylvania and Ohio. He had a passion for rearing and culti-
vating apple trees from seed, and would clear little patches of land
suitable for his purpose, and where he thought apple trees would
be wanted at a future day. He procured seed from Alleghany
County, Penn., sowed it at the proper time in his little clearings,
enclosed it with brush fences, and gave some attention to their cul-
tivation, but never secured a title to the land, or grafted any trees.
As his first-planted orchards bore, he took seed from them, always
choosing the most ameliorated fruits, and, as the population in-
creased, his operations were carried farther westward. They com-
menced near the beginning of the ccntur}', and continued about
thirty years. 2
The early French and Spanish settlers of Louisiana introduced
the peach, which soon grew spontaneously. Professor Nuttall
found it naturalized through the forests of Arkansas in 1819. At
Natchez he found the peach, fig, pear, and quince succeeding ex-
tremely well ; and apple trees introduced from Kentucky met with
nearly equal success; but the cherry, goosebeny, and currant,
though thriving, scarcely produced fruit at all. The pomegranate
and the myrtle grew and fruited almost as in their native climate;
' Transactions of the Ohio Pomological Society for 1859 and 1863; Transactions of the
Dllaoll Horticultural Society for 1370; Horticulturist, Vol. II. p. 420; Letter from S. Burnet
of Vlnoennea, I ml.
» HoTey'a tfagailne. Vol. XTI. p. 133; Ilarper's Magazine, Vol. XT.TTT . p. 830.
FRUIT CULTURE IN CALIFORNIA. 39
while the orange and the lemon required some shelter. Grapes
succeeded only tolerably ; and the olive, which was early introduced
by the French, was entirely lost. In the neighborhood of New
Orleans he saw beautiful orange groves, orchards of figs, and other
productions of the mildest climate, but neither the olive, date, nor
grape. In the city of New Orleans, however, grew a date palm,
more than thirty feet high, with a trunk nearby eighteen inches in
diameter, but, being a staminate plant, it produced no fruit. 1
In California the grape, palm, olive, and other fruits, of which
venerable specimens still remain, were early planted at the various
missions. The olive is said to have been planted about the year
1700. Among the most noted plantations, though dating back only
to about 1810, was the great pear orchard of Santa Clara College,
which sixty years later produced several thousand bushels of fruit.
A grape vine at San Buena venture attained an enormous size, as
did also pear, date palm, English walnut, and olive trees. But
most famous was the great grape vine at Santa Barbara, the trunk
of which, four feet and four inches in circumference, was exhibited
at the Centennial Exhibition at Philadelphia in 1876. The vine,
when growing, covered more than an acre of space, and produced
annually from five to six tons of fruit. Its age was variously stated
at from fifty to a hundred }'ears. It was of the Mission variety,
introduced from Mexico, but probably originally from Spain. 2
As early as 1799 Solomon Lufkin, and, a few years afterwards,
Christopher Osgood, both of Salem, were noted for their attention
to the cultivation of plants and trees. In 1807 greenhouse plants
were advertised for sale at the store of David Swasey in Chestnut
Street, Salem. 8
Ezekiel Hersey Derby of Salem inherited the horticultural tastes
of his father, Elias Haskett Derby, and having, about 1802, taken
possession of the family estate in South Salem, he transformed it
into a delightful residence, with an extensive garden and pleasure
grounds, greenhouses, orchards, and belts of forest trees, many of
choice foreign varieties. He was one of the founders, and for many
years a trustee, of the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agri-
culture ; and the garden and grounds which he planted retained a
portion of their well-deserved fame until within a few years. 4
1 Journal of Travels into the Arkansa Territory.
2 Letter of E. J. Hooper.
a Felt's Annals of Salem, Vol. II. pp. 148, 150.
* Bulletin of the Essex Institute, Vol. II. p. 23.
40 INTRODUCTION.
The tomato was introduced into Salem, about 1802, b} r Michele
Felice Corn6, an Italian painter; but he found it difficult to per-
suade people even to taste the fruit. 1 It is said to have been intro-
duced into Philadelphia, by a French refugee from St. Domingo, in
1798. It was used as an article of food in New Orleans in 1812,
but was not sold in the markets of Philadelphia until 1829. 2 It
did in »t come into general use in the North until some years after
the last-named date.
In 1801 a movement of great importance to the science of hor-
ticulture was made by the Massachusetts Society for Promoting
Agriculture. A vote was passed subscribing five hundred dollars
for the establishment of a professorship of natural history at Cam-
bridge ; and a committee wasappointed to procure subscriptions for
its permanent endowment and for the support of a botanic garden.
This movement resulted in the establishment and endowment of
the Botanic ( larden now connected with Harvard University. The
subscription was completed in 1804, and the garden was laid out
in 1805, under the care of Mr. Bell, an English gardener, and
was for many } - ears successfully managed by William E. Carter.
Contributions were from time to time made to the support of the
garden from the funds of the society which originated it, and it
doubtless exerted a direct influence in cultivating the taste which
led to the formation of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society,
since many of the oldest members made their first purchases of
plants from it. 8
The Elgin Botanic Garden was established in 1801, by Dr. David
Ilosack, on the road between Bloomingdale and Kingsbridge, about
three miles and a halt* from what was then the centre of New York
City. It occupied about twenty acres of land, and included an
extensive conservatory and two spacious hot-houses, exhibiting a
front of a hundred and eighty feet. In 1807 the garden was placed
under the direction of Frederick Pursh, the botanist.' 4 At the be-
ginning of the year 1805 it contained fifteen hundred species of
American plants, for the collection of which it was principally in-
tended. 6 The second edition of the catalogue, published in 1811,
enumerates a total of more than twenty-two hundred species. The
1 lYIt'x Annals of Salem, Vol. n. p. 631.
- Prmlrle Parmer, June 28, 1876.
» Trim*. Ma-*. Boo. for Prom. Ag., New Scries, Vol. I. p. 28.
« Preface to I latalogne of the Elgin Botanic Garden. New York, 1811.
5 Statement <>f facta relative to the establishment and progress of the Elgin Botanic Gar-
den, by David Ilosack, M.D., p. 10. New York, 1811.
DR. HOSACK. — GRANT THORBURN. 41
garden was in 1810 sold to the State of New York, but has long
since wholly disappeared, as have also the botanic gardens estab-
lished previously to 1810 in Charleston, S.C., and in the State of
Maryland. 1
Dr. Hosack was the most distinguished amateur and patron of
gardening, in every sense of the word, of his time, in the United
States. His own residence, Hyde Park, on the Hudson, was
celebrated as one of the finest specimens of landscape gardening
in the country. The estate comprised about seven hundred acres ;
and with its park, large, well-wooded, and intersected by a fine
stream, a handsome and well-filled range of greenhouses and hot-
houses, extensive lawn, shrubberies, flower and kitchen gardens —
the whole kept in the highest order — was for a long time the finest
seat in America. Dr. Hosack was well known in the literary and
scientific world, and his acquaintance abroad enabled him to intro-
duce many new fruits and plants. Some of our finest native fruits
were placed in the hands of horticulturists in Europe through his
means ; among others the Seckel pear, trees of which were sent
by him to the London Horticultural Society in the autumn of
1818. 2
The seed and flower establishment of Messrs. Thorburn has long
been a prominent point of horticultural interest in the city of New
York, and was of great service in diffusing a taste for floricultu-
ral pursuits. Its founder, Grant Thorburn, in 1801 sold a rose
geranium, which he had planted in a pot on his counter to draw
attention to some flower pots that he had for sale in his grocery
store ; and from this insignificant beginning the establishment has
grown to a complete museum of every thing that can be required
in the practice of horticulture. The seed business was added in
1804, with a stock of seeds of the value of fifteen dollars. For
many years Messrs. Thorburn maintained a large greenhouse,
through which was the passage to their store, and in front of this
a large flower bed, which was gorgeous with hyacinths, tulips,
dahlias, etc., attracting the attention of every passer. 8
In the year 1800 Michael Floy came from England to New York,
bringing with him a plant of the Double White camellia, for John
1 Darlington's Memorials, p. 22; Dr. Hosack's Statement, etc., p. 32.
2 Hovey's Magazine, Vol. III. p. 5; Loudon's Gardener's Magazine, Vol. VIH. p. 282;
Downing's Landscape Gardening, sixth ed., p. 29.
s Hovey's Magazine, Vol. I. p. 282, Vol. HI. p. 4; Loudon's Gardener's Magazine, Vol.
II. p. 345, Vol. IV. p. 275.
42 INTRODUCTION.
Stevens of Iloboken, N.J., who had two or three years previously
imported the Single Red. The camellia must have been soon
after introduced into New England; for in 1806 John Prince
received from -Joseph Barrel! of Charlestown a small plant of the
DouMe White. 1 Mr. Floy afterwards established nurseries in New
York, al the corner of Broadway and Twelfth Street, and at Har-
lem, which he carried on in connection with his sons, giving special
attention to the camellia, and originating several fine varieties ;
among them that magnificent kind, the Floyii, the original tree of
which is now in the collection of Marshall P. Wilder.
One of the earliest writers on horticulture in the United States
was Bernard M'Mahon, whose American Gardener's Calendar,
giving directions for all gardening operations in every month in
the year, is still an authority on the subject. The first edition
was published in 1806. To him we are mainly indebted for the
dissemination of the novelties collected by Lewis and Clarke in
their journey to the Pacific. His garden and greenhouses were
near the < rermantown turnpike, between Philadelphia and Nice-
town. The nursery was purchased in 1830 by Hibbert & Buist.
At this period, large importations of the fruits of highest repu-
tation in Europe were sometimes made by wealthy amateurs, with
the hope of increasing the number of superior varieties ; but these
hopes were to a great extent disappointed. From among one
hundred and fifty varieties imported into Boston b} - Eben Preble,
about 1805, the only additions to the list of desirable kinds were
two cherries — the Black Tartarian and White Tartarian — and a
single pear.- At the meeting of the New York Horticultural
Societ}- July 9, 1822, a member presented a catalogue of fruit
trees which he had purchased in Europe, comprising, in all, seven
hundred and eighty-four varieties. 8
Among the most noted gardens in the United States in the early
part of the present century, besides those already mentioned, were
the seat of Judge Peters, near Philadelphia, famed for its gardens
and pleasure grounds, in which are a chestnut tree, planted by
\\ ashington, producing the largest and finest fruit, and a grand
old avenue of hemlocks, planted nearly a hundred and fifty years
ago, many of which are now venerable specimens a hundred feet
1 Hovcy's Magazine, Vol. I. p. 14.
• Letter of William Konrick to Gen. Dearborn, Feb. 6, 1830.
» Boston Palladium, Sept. 9, 1822.
FRUITS IN 1814. 43
high, whose huge trunks aud wide-spread branches are densely
wreathed and draped with English ivy, and many other interesting
features, the whole estate being now included in the new Fair-
mount Park ; Clermont on the Hudson, the show place of the
last age, then the seat of Chancellor Livingston, partaking of the
French style ; the manor of Livingston, near the city of Hudson ;
and Montgomery Place, near Barry town, N.Y., originally the resi-
dence of Gen. Montgomer}', the hero of Quebec, and afterwards
of Edward Livingston, with its grand natural scenery, arboretum,
conservatory, and one of the most perfect flower gardens in the
country. 1
A writer in the Massachusetts Agricultural Repository a fur-
nished the following list of the best varieties of fruits, and re-
marked, that as much greater encouragement had been given in the
metropolis to the raising of good fruit than previously, and as the
inhabitants of our great towns began to discriminate the varieties,
and to pa} r liberal prices for the best, it was hoped and expected
that greater attention would be paid by cultivators to the quality of
the fruits which they raised. It was thought that there was then
in the State nearly every good variety of the pear known in France.
Peaches, Early Ann, White Magdalen, Red Magdalen, Noblesse,
Old Newington, Swalch, Catherine, Lemon Clingstone, Vanguard,
Blood.
Cherries, Mayduke, English, Black Heart, Bigarreaus, Black
Tartarian.
Apples, Rhode Island Greening, Red Nonsuch, Nonpareil, New-
town Pippin, Roxbury Russet, 3 Spitzenberg, Baldwin. 4
Pears, Little Muscat, Catherine, Jargonelle, Summer Bergamot,
Brockholst 5 Bergamot, Brown Beurre, St. Michael, Monsieur
Jean, Rousseline, "Winter Good Christian, Virgouleuse, Colmar,
Chaumontelle, St. Germain. The last is described as the most
profitable, the most uniformly good, and the best for keeping.
1 Downing's Landscape Gardening, sixth ed., pp. 26-33.
2 Vol. HI., 1814, p. 92.
s The Roxbury Russet probably originated in Roxbury soon after the settlement of the
country. The first settlers of Stonington, Conn., went from Roxbury as early as 1649, and
tradition states that they brought this apple at a very early date. It has been more largely
planted in Eastern Connecticut than any other variety, and there are trees a hundred years
or more of age still standing there. — Letter of Rev. W. Clift of Stonington.
4 The Baldwin had then recently been brought into notice. The original tree 6tood,
probably, in Wilmington, though one account locates it in Tewksbury. It first fruited about
the middle of the last century.
5 Brocas?
44 INTRODUCTION.
Three-quarters of a century ago, or later, many decaying pear
trees could be seen near ancient cellars in this section of the
country, and in pastures by old cart-paths. The fruit of these
\ aried from small to large in size, and, in character, from the
hardest, fit only for cooking (and not for that without something
to counteract its acidity and astringency) , to that which was then
called good eating fruit. At that period there were comparatively
few orchards of apple trees in which there was a single grafted
tree, (he great object then being the production of cider; and, if a
good eating apple appeared among the numerous seedlings, it was
not known, in most cases, beyond the farm where it originated.
In two centuries from the settlement of the country very little
progress had been made in horticultural science. Seedling plums,
pears, peaches, and cherries, as well as apples, were to be found
in abundance, when there was any market, and a portion of them
were very good ; but, down to 1820, we do not find the record of
fruit trees or scions having been imported or disseminated to any
considerable extent. 1 Dr. Thacher, in the dedication to his
American Orchardist, dated Plymouth, July, 1821, sa}-s, "It is
a remarkable fact that the first planters bequeathed to their pos-
terity a greater number of orchards, in proportion to their popula-
tion, than are now to be found in the Old Colony."
The progress of horticulture was checked by the last war with
England; but, as the country recovered from the effects of that
conflict, there began a new era of horticultural improvement. As
the close of the Revolution was followed by the formation of the
Philadelphia and other agricultural societies, so the close of the
later war was speedily followed (in 1818) by the organization
of the New York Horticultural Society, the first society of its
kind in the United States. It was incorporated in 1822, and
included among its founders and members the most eminent
scientific and practical horticulturists in the vicinity of the city
of New York ; such as Dr. Ilosack, who was for some 3'ears its
president, Dr. Samuel L. Mitchill, Messrs. Thorburn, Prince,
Floy, Thomas Hogg, Andre Parmentier, William "Wilson, and
others. The plans of the society were comprehensive, including
a garden of from ten to twenty acres, to be devoted to horti-
culture and botany, but more particularly to the culture of fruit
trees. It was proposed also to have a hall for public lectures, a
1 Recollections of Joseph Breck.
HORTICULTURAL SOCIETIES. 45
library, a botanical cabinet, and a professor of botany and horti-
culture. For many years the society was conducted with much
energy; but later, the interest in it declined, and about 1837 it
ceased to exist. Dr. Torrey, the eminent botanist, was the last
president. 1
The next horticultural society in the United States was the
Pennsylvania Society, organized at Philadelphia on the 20th
of November, 1827, and chartered by the State on the 24th of
March, 1831 ; its first schedule of premiums having been adopted
January 4, 1830, and the first annual display held in the autumn of
the same j-ear. More fortunate than its predecessor in New York,
it has gone on with increasing prosperity until the present day ; so
that it is the oldest horticultural society now existing in the coun-
try — too well known to need any thing said here, beyond express-
ing the hope that its progress, and its beneficial influence on horti-
culture, may be even greater in the future than in the past.
Two other horticultural societies were formed in the United States
previously to the organization of the Massachusetts society, — the
Domestic Horticultural Societ}', at Geneva, N.Y., in 1828, having
for its field of operation ten counties in Western New York, 2 and
holding its meetings and exhibitions alternately at Geneva, Lyons,
and Canandaigua ; 8 and the Albany Horticultural Society, formed
in 1829, but a short time before the formation of the Massa-
chusetts Horticultural Societ}-, of which Judge Buel was the first
president. 4 Neither of these two societies existed more than a few
years ; but the Domestic Society held an exhibition at Geneva,
Jul}' 3, 1835, 5 and a fine autumnal show of fruits, flowers, and
vegetables at Canandaigua on the 30th of September of the same
year. 6 In the By-Laws of the Massachusetts Horticultural So-
ciety, adopted in 1836, the Committee on the Synonymes of
Fruits was directed to facilitate an exchange of specimens with
the Albany as well as with the Philadelphia and New York horti-
cultural societies, for the purpose of establishing their synonymes.
It would be unjust to pass over the inception of horticultural
societies in the United States without some allusion to the proto-
1 American Journal of Science and Art, Vol. VIII. p. 398; Hovey's Magazine, Vol. II.
pp. 391, 401, Vol. III. p. 389; Letter of John J. Thomas.
* New England Farmer, Vol. VII. p. 174.
3 Hovey's Magazine, Vol. V. p. 12.
« New England Farmer, Vol. VII. pp. 207, 245.
8 Hovey's Magazine, Vol. I. p. 311.
« Ibid., p. 431.
46 INTRODUCTION.
type of all such societies, the Horticultural Society of London,
which was organized March 7, 1804, and chartered in 1809, and
for twenty-seven years, from 1811 to 1838, was presided over by
Thomas Andrew Knight, whose unrivalled combination of scientific
knowledge of vegetable physiology, and practical skill in horticul-
tural operations, were, during all that time, directed to promoting
the interests of the society, and. through it, of horticulture every-
where. Professor John Lindley was assistant secretary from 1822
to 1858, and secretary from 1858 to 1SG2. giving to the manage-
ment of the society his great talents and inexhaustible energy. 1
In 1825 Gov. Clinton and Dr. Hosack of New York were mem-
bers of the society ; and Messrs. Floy, Hogg, and Wilson, of New
York. Jndge Buel of Albany. William Prince of Flushing, David
Thomas of Cayuga County. N.Y., William Coxe of Burlington,
X.J.. Mr. Diek of Philadelphia, and John Lowell and Samuel G.
Perkins of Boston, were corresponding members. -
N 3 oized body has ever imparted such a stimulus to cultiva-
tion as this society. It was many year- ago remarked that it had
accomplished more since its foundation than China had done in a
thousand years. What it has effected is best told in a report of the
Council, made May 1, 1837, from which we quote : —
•*It has minutely examined and reduced to order the names of
fruit trees and of esculent plants ; it has directed the attention
of scientific as well as of practical men to the improvement of the
arts of cultivation ; it has introduced at much cost great numbers
of exotic plants to decorate our gardens ; it has published many
volumes filled with important treatises upon almost every subject
in which the gardener is interested ; it has formed a very extensive
D and orchard, in which have been collected from time to time
numerous plants valuable for their utility or beauty ; it has given
a great impetus to cultivation by its public exhibitions of garden
produce ; it has been a school from which have sprung some of the
Dgnished gardeners of the present century; and it has
given away to its fellows and to public establishments above a
million and a half of plants, packets of seeds, and cuttings. In
effecting all, this about £250,000 has been expended, of which
£40,000 has been consumed in the creation of the garden, more
than £2,000 in forming collections of drawings, models of fruits,
1 Book of the Uoyal Horticultural Society, pp. 9, 11, 25, 27.
1 New England Fanner, Vol. HI. p. 83.
AGRICULTURAL JOURNALS. 47
etc., £13,000 in the mere cost of procuring new plants and seeds,
while above £20,000 has been applied in the form of medals and
money prizes for the encouragement of horticulture." '
The societ} r is best known in the United States by its Catalogue
of Fruits, which is the foundation of all accurate penological
nomenclature ; but a reminder of its energy is seen in every garden
which contains the Wistaria Sinensis, 2 the Weigela rosea, or the
Dielytra spectabilis, the most popular of the many beautiful plants
that we owe to the society.
The Caledonian Horticultural Society was formed in 1809, and
that of Paris, in 1826.
In 1819 the American Farmer was established in Baltimore,
and it is now the oldest agricultural periodical in the United
States which has had a continued existence in some form to this day.
In 1822 the New England Farmer was established in Boston,
under the conduct of Thomas Gr. Fessenden, author of the New
American Gardener, who continued editor until his death, on the
10th of November, 1837. In 1828 the words Horticultural Jour-
nal were added to the title of the paper ; but articles on horti-
culture had from the commencement frequently appeared in its
pages from Mr. Lowell, Gen. Dearborn, John Prince, John Welles,
Gorham Parsons, S. W. Pomeroy, Samuel G. Perkins, and Jesse
Buel of Alban}-, as well as the editor. In November, 1826, Joseph
R. Newell, who had previously kept an agricultural warehouse at
No. 108 State Street, removed to No. 52 North Market Street;
and in January, 1827, the office of the Farmer was removed to the
room over Mr. Newell's establishment, where John B. Russell, the
publisher from September 4, 1824, to November 28, 1832, opened
a seed-store. 3 The close combination of the Farmer office and
seed-store with the agricultural warehouse attracted agriculturists
and horticulturists from all parts of the country ; so that the office
of the Farmer became an exchange for the discussion of all
matters of interest to cultivators. 4 It was here that the subject
1 Book of the Royal Horticultural Society, p. 43.
2 The first living plant of Wistaria (formerly Glycine) Sinensis was sent from China in
1818, by John Reeves, and was still growing in the garden at Chiswick in 18G3. Trobably
this is the plant mentioned in the Botanical Register as covering eighteen hundred square
feet of wall, and producing six hundred and seventy-five thousand flowers in 1840.
3 In August, 18D6, Joseph Breck & Co. purchased the Farmer and seed-store, and, a year
later, they added the agricultural warehouse of Mr. Newell. They were the publishers
of the Farmer until its discontinuance in 1S46, when they became interested in the Horticultu-
rist, then commenced at Albany, N.Y.
4 MS. of Joseph Breck ; Advertisements in New England Farmer.
48 INTRODUCTION'.
of forming a horticultural society was discussed ; and. when such
a society was formed, the Farmer naturally became its organ,
and continued to be as long as it existed.
The nursery established by Jonathan "Winship, at his residence
in Brighton, in 1816, was, next to that established by John Kcnrick,
the oldest near Boston. That, however, was confined to hardy
plants, while the Winship nursery comprised a collection of green-
house plants. In 1824 Capt. Winship associated with him his
brother Francis, and the firrn had finally thirty acres under cultiva-
tion. Special attention was given to ornamental trees and plants.
In 1823 Robert Manning of Salem commenced the formation
of his pomological garden, with the design of collecting speci-
men trees of such varieties of fruits, both native and foreign,
as were hardy enough to endure the inclemency of our winters,
identifying, and testing them, and selecting for propagation such
as proved worthy. In pursuing this object, he soon, in connection
with William Kenriek, opened a correspondence with Dr. Van
Mons of Belgium (receiving from him the many fine varieties which
he had originated), and with Robert Thompson, the head of the
fruit department in the garden of the London Horticultural Society,
and author of their Catalogue of Fruits ; the scions received from
the latter source being taken from the trees carefully identified
by Mr. Thompson. Trees and scions were also drawn from all
the prominent nurserymen and other cultivators in Europe and
America. Though the obstacles to importing trees and scions,
independent of the difficulty of obtaining the newer and choicer
varieties from sources to be depended on, were much greater than
at present, owing to the slowness and irregularity of communica-
tion, yet Mr. Manning pursued his chosen work with such ardor,
that, at the time of his death, in 1842, his collection of fruits was
far larger than had previously been made by any American pomolo-
:. mounting to nearly two thousand varieties of apples, pears,
peaches, plums, cherries, and apricots ; pears, which were his
favorite fruit, forming by far the larger part. lie also established
a nursery for the propagation and sale of such varieties as proved
worthy of general cultivation. To him more than to any other
one in his day — perhaps it would be just to say more than to all
others — were the public indebted for the introduction of new and
choice fruits, for the identification of the different varieties, for the
correction of their nomenclature, and the testing of their qualities ;
KNIGHT AND LOWELL. 49
and he was acknowledged to be the highest authority in regard to
the names and synonymes of fruits. His work was taken up at
his death by his son, of the same name, who for some years con-
tinued to identify, test, and disseminate the valuable fruits collected
b}- his father and himself. 1
In 1823, also, John Lowell published an interesting notice of
Thomas Andrew Knight, president of the London Horticultural
Society, his experiments, and his presents to the Massachusetts
Society for Promoting Agriculture. These presents consisted of
trees and scions of the new varieties of fruit originated b} r Mr.
Knight, or introduced from the continent of Europe, which were
confided to Mr. Lowell, as president of the Agricultural Society, for
propagation and distribution. To this source we are indebted for
the first introduction of some of our finest fruits ; the first parcel
received from Mr. Knight comprising, among others, the Urban-
iste, Marie Louise, Napoleou, and Passe Colmar pears, the Black
Eagle, Elton, Downton, and Waterloo cherries, and the Coe's
Golden Dropjilum. Mr. Lowell continued for some years to re-
ceive from Mr. Knight trees and scions of new fruits, and, when
the Massachusetts Horticultural Society was organized, he freely
offered scions of these improved varieties to its members." At
about the same time, Judge Buel of Albany also imported from Mr.
Knight and from the London Horticultural Societ}* choice new
varieties of fruits ; 3 and Samuel G. Perkins of Brookline offered
to give strawberry plants, and scions of new pears and plums,
which he had received from the London Horticultural Society and
other sources, to such persons as would call or send for them. 4 It
will be remembered that Messrs. Lowell, Buel, and Perkins were
corresponding members of the London Societ}'.
It was at about this time that the decay of the fine old varieties
of the pear was noticed. In 1826 Mr. Lowell stated that the
Chaumontelle, Virgouleuse, St. Germain, Summer and Winter
Bonchretiens, and St. Michael, were generally in a diseased or des-
perate state.
The grounds of Henry Pratt, at Lemon Hill, near Philadelphia,
which were for a long time considered the show garden of that
1 Book of Fruits, p. 5; New England Farmer, Vol. XXI. p. 164; Bulletin of the Essex
Institute, Vol. II. p. 24; Horticultural Register, Vol. I. p. 290, Vol. H. p. 249.
» Mass. Ag. Repos., Vol. VII. p. 331, Vol. VIII. pp. 140, 344, Vol. X. p. 205; New Eng-
land Farmer, Vol. II. p. 217, Vol. VI. p. 331, Vol. VH. p. 401.
» New England Farmer, Vol. III. p. 291.
« Ibid., Vol. IV. p. 22.
50 INTRODUCTION.
city, were in the height of their beauty from 1820 to 1825 ; and
the proprietor, opening them freely to the citizens, contributed in
a great degree to improve their taste, and to inspire them with a
desire to possess the more beautiful productions of nature. The
grounds were laid out in the geometric mode, and were the most
perfect specimen of this style in America. 1 They now form a part
of the great Fairmount Park.
Walt ham House, the seat of Gov. Gore, and afterwards of
Theodore Lyman, about nine miles from Boston, was also at
this time one of the most beautiful places as regards landscape
gardening, with a fine level park a mile in length, enriched with
groups of English elms, limes, and oaks, watered b}* a fine stream,
and stocked with deer. Here, also, the finest varieties of fruit
were cultivated, the trees being trained on walls, in the English
method : and there were also a grapery, greenhouse, and hot-house.
This and the Woodlands were the two best specimens of the
modern style, as Judge Pctcrs's seat, Clermont, and Lemon Hill,
were of the ancient style, in the early period of the history of land-
scape gardening in the United States. 2
In 1823 Samuel and John Feast began cultivating trees, plants,
and vegetables in Baltimore, on the Frederick road, and were the
first to offer plants for sale in the public markets of Baltimore. 8
In 1827-28 the garden of Dr. Thomas Young, at Savannah,
claimed superiority over every other in the South, being filled with
rare plants from every part of the world. The garden of Dr.
Wray, at Augusta, was rich in bulbs, native herbaceous plants,
and succulents. Major Le Conte's garden, at Riceborough, also
contained a superb collection of bulbs. At Charleston, S.C.,
M. Noisette, brother to the Paris nurseryman of the same name,
had an extensive establishment, chiefly in the culinary line ; but his
grounds contained many fine camellias, Cycas revoluta, Noisette
roses, etc. These and the gardens of Dr. McRce of Wilmington,
N.( .. and Mr. Oemler of Savannah, were long considered inferior
to ii" private collections in the Union. 4
In 1828 Judge Buel enumerated. 5 as among the principal nur-
series in the United States (besides those already mentioned in
1 II ■ine, Vol. III. p. 4; Downing's Landscape Gardening, sixth ed., p. 27.
> Downing*! Landscape Gardening, sixth ed., p. 28.
* Gardi d< r'a Monthly, Vol. XX. p. 384,
« Lou. 1. iii's Gardener's Magazine, Vol. IV. p. 464; llovey's Magazine, Vol. III. p. 7.
8 Loudon's Gardener's Magazine, Vol. IV. p. 193.
PAEMENTIER AND THOMAS. 51
this sketch) , the Blooclgood nursery, at Flushing, which was espe-
cially distinguished for its well-grown fruit trees ; 1 Wilson's nur-
sery, at Greenwich ; and Hogg's nursery, at Bloomingdale, Mr.
Hogg being, probably, the best cultivator of exotics in New York ; 2
Buel and Wilson's nursery, at Albany ; Sinclair and Moore's,
at Baltimore, Md. ; and the nursery of Andre Parmentier, at
Brooklyn, N.Y. The last-named establishment was situated at
the junction of Jamaica and Flatbush turnpikes, where is now the
most thickly settled part of the city of Brooklyn. The proprietor
was the brother of that celebrated horticulturist, the Chevalier Par-
mentier, mayor of Enghien, Belgium, and was the first practitioner
of the art of landscape gardening, of any note, in this country, to
which he came about 1824. In his nurseries he gave a specimen
of the natural style of la}ing out grounds, combined with a scien-
tific arrangement of plants, which excited public curiosit} 7 , and
contributed much to the dissemination of a taste for a natural
mode of landscape gardening. He frequently visited other parts
of the country for the purpose of laying out the gardens and
pleasure grounds of such gentlemen as desired his services. 8
David Thomas of Aurora, Ca}-uga County, N.Y., was the pio-
neer horticulturist in the western part of that State, which has
now become the nursery garden of the country. He did much
towards introducing new and valuable fruits during the early part
of the present century ; and from the year 1830, and for ten or
twenty years afterwards, he had probably the most extensive and
valuable collection of bearing trees west of the Hudson. He was
even more interested in floriculture and botan} 7 than in pomology,
and made a very extensive collection of native as well as exotic
ornamental plants, and was elected a corresponding member of
the London Horticultural Society and of the Linnaean Society of
Paris. 4 In his horticultural pursuits he associated with him his
son, John J. Thomas, author of the Fruit Culturist, and horti-
cultural editor of the Country Gentleman, and well known as a
most accurate, systematic, and conscientious horticulturist.
In October, 1828, John A. and Samuel Wilson of Derry, N.H.,
advertised in the New England Farmer a stock of more than
1 Loudon's Gardener's Magazine, Vol. VIU. p. 280.
2 Hovey's Magazine, Vol. III. p. 4.
3 Downing's Landscape Gardening, sixth ed., p. 24; New England Farmer, Vol. VI.
pp. 215, 391, Vol. VII. p. 84.
* Letter of John J. Thomas.
52 INTRODUCTION.
fifty thousand fruit trees of different kinds in their nursery, which
had been established for more than thirty years.
It would appear, that, notwithstanding the increase of commer-
cial nurseries, the neighborhood of Boston was far behind other
parts of the country in its ability to furnish the trees and plants
needed in a garden, or to supply the market with choice fruit, and
that the advance in horticulture was confined mainly to private
gardens, but that the latter were not excelled in any part of the
country. A private garden at Jamaica Plain, that of John Prince,
produced for dessert, in August, 1825, eleven varieties of pears,
four each of plums, apples, and grapes, and two of apricots, be-
sides oranges, mulberries, and muskmelons. Yet it was thought
that there were not at that time more than twenty market-farmers
in the vicinity of Boston who gave much attention to fruit as a
source of profit. 1 In 1S22 Mr. Lowell said, 2 "We are utterly
destitute, in New England, of nurseries for fruit trees on an exten-
sive scale. "We have no cultivators on whom we can call for a
Bupply of the most common plants of the smaller fruits, such as
strawberries, gooseberries, raspberries, of the superior kinds ; we
have no place to which we can go for plants to ornament our
grounds ; we have not a single seedsman who can furnish us with
fresh seeds of annual flowers on which we can place a reliance."
A year later, he asked, 8 " Shall it be said, that from June to Sep-
tember in our scorching summers, a traveller may traverse Massa-
chusetts, from Boston to Albany, and not be able to procure a
plate of fruit, — except wild strawberries, blackberries, and whor-
tleberries, — unless from the hospitality of private gentlemen? "
A sketch of the histoiy of horticulture in this country would be
incomplete without some mention of the literature of the subject.
Here, also, as might be expected, we find agriculture preceding
horticulture, the first work, the Essays upon Field-Husbandry, by
the Rev. Jarcd Eliot of Killingworth, Conn., begun in 1747, but
barely alluding to fruit culture. Eliot, who was a grandson of
the apostle Eliot, introduced the white mulbeny into Connecticut,
and wrote a treatise on the mulberry tree and silk-worms. The
New-England Farmer, or Georgical Dictionar}-, of Dr. Samuel
Deane, was published in 1700. The American Gardener, by
1 Now Knclan.l Farmer, Vol. IV. p. 60.
i tCaos. kg. Repos., VoL VII. p. 137.
» rbld., Vol. VII. p. 320.
HORTICULTURAL LITERATURE. 53
John Gardiner and David Hepburn, was published at Washing-
ton, D.C., in 1804. M'Mahon, in the preface to the American
Gardener's Calendar, published in 180G, says that in writing this
treatise he had had recourse, besides other authorities, to the best
American publications ; but, unless a large number have escaped
notice, these must have been scant}' at that time. The American
Practical Gardener, by "An Old Gardener," was published at
Baltimore in 1819 ; and William Cobbett's American Gardener,
at New York, in the same 3-ear. The Gentleman's and Garden-
er's Kalendar, by Grant Thorburn, was also published at New
York in 1821. The calendar appears to have been a favorite form
for a work on gardening in these and earlier days. The American
Vine Dresser's Guide, by Alphonse Loubat, was published in New
York in 1827. The New American Gardener, by Thomas Green
Fessenden, and a Treatise on the Cultivation of Flowers, by
Roland Green, appeared at Boston in 1828 ; and the Economy
of the Kitchen-Garden, Orchard, and Vinery, by William Wilson,
at New York in the same year. The works of Martha Logan,
Coxe, Prince, Adlum, and Thacher, have been mentioned in the
course of this chapter, as have also the Massachusetts Agricultu-
ral Repository, the American Farmer, and the New England
Farmer. Various European works on agriculture and horticul-
ture were republished in this country ; and several agricultural
magazines, as well as transactions of agricultural societies, among
which we mention only the Memoirs of the Philadelphia Society
for Promoting Agriculture, were published and discontinued before
the formation of the Massachusetts Horticultural Societ}- ; but no
exclusively horticultural periodical was published until after that
time. From the time of Jacques Cornutus, in 1G35, the botany of
North America received frequent attention from scientific writers ;
but the first strictly American botanical work, written and printed
in this country, by a native, is believed to be the Arbustum
Americanum of Humphry Marshall, — a description of the forest
trees and shrubs of the United States, printed in 1785. A mere
allusion to the man}* botanical works which have followed it must
suffice.
We have thus, as briefly as possible, while doing proper justice
to the subject, reviewed the progress of horticultural improvement
in this countiy for more than two centuries. We have seen that
the first settlers from England, France, and other European coun-
54 INTRODUCTION.
tries, and the emigrants from the older to the newer States, brought
with them a love of horticulture, and, as early as practicable,
planted gardens, orchards, and nurseries. During the greater part
of this long period, the advancement of horticulture was compara-
tively slow, and the enjoyment of its choicer productions — most
even of these being muoh inferior to those of our own time — was
confined to the wealthier portion of the inhabitants, the great
majority knowing few except seedling fruits; for the art of grafting
was understood by few. l>ut from the beginning of the present
century, or earlier, the improvement was more rapid, as is shown
by the following remarks with which Mr. Lowell concluded an
address before the Massachusetts Society for Promoting Agricul-
ture in 1824 : 1 "As to horticulture, the field is newly explored.
From a barren wilderness, it has become a fertile garden. In my
short spine of residence in this mutable world, I remember when
the Mayduke and the sour Kentish Cherry could alone be seen in
our market ; and there is not now a market on earth better sup-
plied than ours with every variety of the most delicious chi
I remember when our strawberries were only gathered from the
grass-fields. I recollect the first boxes of cultivated strawberries
ever sent to Boston market: they are now in profusion, and of
excellent quality, but still susceptible of vast improvement. Who
ever heard of an English or Dutch gooseberry or raspberry at
market twenty-five years since? The Geniting, Cattern, Minot,
and Iron pears, some of them execrable, were often seen; but not
a single delicious variety was known out of the garden of the rich
connoisseur. There never was a more rapid progress in any coun-
try than that which we have made in horticulture, and yet there is
no one point in which we are so defective: I hope and believe,
however, that we shall soon supply this defect." Perhaps Mr.
Lowell, iii these closing words, had in mind the formation of a soci-
ety to supply the defect which he pointed out; but, however this
may have been, we cannot doubt that the increased rapidity in the
progress of horticulture Led its Lovers to consider the best means
of Its further advancement ; and their views, discussed on various
occasions and in various places, ultimately took shape and form in
the organization of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society.
1 Mass. Ag. Repos., Vol. VEX p. 216.
HISTOET
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
CHAPTER I.
THE OEGANIZATION AND OBJECTS OF THE SOCIETY.
We have seen how the way was gradually prepared
for the formation of a horticultural society in the State
of Massachusetts. It has often been observed, that,
when the time is ripe for the development of an idea, it
occurs simultaneously to many minds ; and it is not easy
now to prove who first suggested the establishment of
the Massachusetts Horticultural Society. Gen. Dear-
born twice states, in written prefaces to volumes of his
works which he has left to his family, that " a number
of gentlemen in Boston and the surrounding towns had
long considered it desirable that an association should be
formed for advancing the science and art of horticul-
ture ; and, after several informal meetings, a public one
was held in the city, on the 24th of February, 1829,
when it was determined to organize a society."
In the winter of 1828-29 a letter was received by
John B. Russell, publisher of' the New England Farm-
er, from Judge Buel of Albany, who asked, " Why do
not the Boston gentlemen start a horticultural society ? "
55
56 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and added, " There is more talent iu Boston and vicinity
for such an association than in any place in the United
Stales." Acting on this hint, Mr. Russell suggested to
the numerous visitors to his office the formation of a
horticultural society, and it is believed that this was the
first formal proposal of such an organization in Massa-
chusetts.
On Friday, the 9th of January, 1829, a communication
appeared in the New England Farmer, written two days
earlier by a zealous friend 1 of horticulture. As this
was the first public proposition for the foundation of a
horticultural society in Massachusetts, we give the article
in full, as follows : —
" The influence that has been so generally diffused throughout
our State, by the institution of Agricultural Societies, is felt and
acknowledged to be of immense importance to the interests of the
cultivator as well as to the consumers of the surplus produce of
his labors. Whatever has a teudeuc}* to promote this honorable,
and useful, and independent branch of domestic industry, should
be fostered and regarded.
" It is equally gratifying to perceive that there is an excellent
horticultural spirit awakened in our community, and which is not
confined to the citizens of the metropolis, but pervades most of
the neighboring towns and villages. We have witnessed with
much pleasure the increasing interest, and ardent efforts of our
citizens in this peaceful and healthful employment, and seen its
visible effects, not only in the process of cultivation, but in its
maturity. Our stalls and fruit-shops have been abundantly sup-
plied the past season with better and greater varieties of fine
fruits than heretofore.
" The invalid must be grateful to those who thus administer to
his enjoyments. The healthful will not be unmindful of the pleas-
ure afforded by the display of the rich dessert with which his
table is crowned. And the public will view with complacent re-
gard the attention bestowed upon this branch of the ' American
1 Zebedee Cook, jun., of Dorchester.
FIRST PUBLIC PROPOSITION. 57
System,' which needs no public act of doubtful expediency to
insure its protection.
"It cannot be expected, that, in our Northern climate, we
should produce, even by untiring assiduity, or extensive outlay,
all those fine varieties of fruit which are yielded spontaneously, or
with comparatively little labor, in some sections of our highly
favored country. Under all discouragements, however, it must be
admitted, that much has been achieved ; and under the continued
auspices of Heaven, and our native industry and perseverance, we
may continue freeby to enjoy the healtlw and invigorating pleasures
of the cultivator, and share the bounties a benevolent Providence
awards to the labors of man.
"Who, then, among us, is to give the impulse to more exten-
sive and active exertions? To those who have been the modern
pioneers in the resuscitation of this primitive employment of a
portion of our race, who have labored with the mind and hands so
industriously and efficiently in the vineyard, we must look for coun-
tenance and instruction, for the enlargement and improvement of
the system so successfully commenced, and so ardently and patri-
otically pursued, by several of our distinguished fellow-citizens.
"We have been led to a consideration of this subject at the
present time for the purpose of calling the attention of experienced
and practical horticulturists toward the founding of a society for
the promotion of that useful employment, of extending its bless-
ings, and increasing the efforts of those who feel an interest in
such pursuits.
" The citizens of Massachusetts have never been backward in
promoting any object of public utility, and it is believed, that all
that is now wanting to give an impulse to the plan here suggested
is to present the subject to the consideration of your readers.
" New York, Philadelphia, and some other of our sister cities,
have preceded us in the good work. Let us go and do likewise."
The editor 1 of the Farmer cordially approved the
views taken in this article, introducing it to his readers
thus : —
" We fully concur in opinion with the writer of the above able
article, from a respected correspondent, that a society for the pro-
1 Thomas G. Fessenden.
58 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTUKAL SOCIETY.
motion of skilful and scientific horticulture, established in Boston,
would greatly subserve the interests of the community, as well as
furnish avenues to laudable distinction, and pure and praiseworthy
enjoyment to the members of such an institution. A number of
persons associated for a desirable object may furnish an aggregate
of mind and means, which is much more effective for beneficial
purposes than would be the isolated efforts of the same individuals.
A Horticultural Society might introduce new and useful plants
from various quarters of the globe ; import valuable and expensive
publications, as well as form a repository for new and useful imple-
ments, which would be be}"ond the powers of more numerous and
wealth}- persons to accomplish without acting in concert."
The proposed horticultural society did not fail of
becoming a reality, for the idea was a practical one ; the
institution had been needed for several years ; such asso-
ciations had been eminently successful in this and other
countries ; and the idea had become popular in Boston
and the neighborhood by occasional hints in the periodi-
cals of the day on the subject, by the conversation of
eminent horticulturists, and especially by the example
of successful agricultural societies.
We are not surprised, therefore, to learn, that in
about six weeks from the time the above article ap-
peared in the Farmer, agreeably to a request, published
in the same paper of February 20, to such gentlemen
us felt favorably disposed toward the institution of a
horticultural society, to meet at the insurance office of
Zebedee Cook, jun., on Tuesday, the 24th, at noon,
for the purpose of taking measures preliminary thereto,
— similar printed requests being also addressed directly
i<> gentlemen interested in horticulture, — a meeting of
sixteen gentlemen, the first public one of the kind,
convened at the time and place mentioned, although the
day was bitterly cold, and a remarkable snow-storm had
FIRST PUBLIC MEETING. 59
just filled the streets to the depth of five or six feet in
the city, and much deeper in the country towns. To
give character to this preliminary meeting it was deemed
quite an object to have the Hon. John Lowell, who then
stood at the head of the horticulturists of Massachusetts,
preside. His health being feeble, he had felt but little
hope that he should be able to be present. One of his
neighbors on Colonnade How, Cheever Newhall, how-
ever, called on him that morning, with his sleigh and
extra blankets, and induced him to wrap up and come
down, to the great gratification of the company. 1
A few appropriate remarks on the object of the
meeting were made by Gen. H. A. S. Dearborn, when
he proposed its organization, which was effected by
choosing Mr. Lowell moderator, and Zebedee Cook,
jun., secretary. It was then voted that Messrs. Henry
A. S. Dearborn, Zebedee Cook, jun., and Samuel
Downer, be a committee to prepare a constitution and
by-laws for the government of the society, and to
report the same at a future meeting, to be held at the
time and place the committee might designate. It was
also voted that Messrs. John B. Russell, Enoch Bartlett,
Zebedee Cook, jun., Samuel Downer, and Cheever New-
hall be a committee to obtain subscribers to the society,
after which the meeting was adjourned. Besides Mr.
Lowell, who presided at this meeting, Mr. Cook the
secretary, Gen. Dearborn who opened the meeting, and
Mr. Russell who lives to tell us of the occasion, it
may safely be concluded that Messrs. Downer, Bart-
lett, and Newhall, who were appointed on commit-
tees, were present. Robert Manning and John M.
Ives came from Salem, as is stated by Mr. Ives, and
1 Reminiscences of the Mass. Hort. Soc. by John B. Russell in Tilton's
Journal of Horticulture, Vol. VII. p. 88.
GO MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Andrews Breed and his brother Henry A. Breed came
from Lynn. To the best of the recollection of the last-
named gentleman the other five founders of the society
were William Kenrick, Jonathan Winship, Robert L.
Emmons, Benjamin V. French, and William H. Sum-
ner. Messrs. Russell and Ives, and the two Messrs.
Breed still survive.
The number of the New England Farmer contain-
ing an official account of this meeting has also a com-
munication, over the signature " Dorchester," from which
we give the following extract : —
""We are pleased to learn that the meeting of the friends of hor-
ticulture in this city on Tuesday last was numerously attended, 1
and that the occasion afforded the most conclusive evidence that a
society for the improvement of this branch of our domestic indus-
try will be established under auspicious circumstances.
' ' For ourselves we have long felt a strong interest in this mat-
ter. "We have seen in other sections of our country the beneficial
influence of institutions devoted to the practice of horticultural
pursuits, and heard more of its ameliorating effects upon the varie-
ties of fruits heretofore cultivated with partial success.
" The association of men of taste, of influence, and industr}', has
effected, in some of our neighboring cities, a wonderful improve-
ment in the qualities of indigenous fruits, and a great increase of
the varieties of foreign, of every kind, susceptible of successful
culture in our climate. Here individual efforts have generously
and patriotically contributed to collect the finest varieties of fruits,
and not onby to distribute gratuitously the plants or the scions, as
the case may be, for extended culture, but, what renders the favor
more valuable, to impart from their rich stores of practical knowl-
edge a portion for the benefit of the uninitiated."
An adjourned meeting of the subscribers for a horti-
Eultural society was held at the same place on Tuesday
the 17th of March, three weeks from the time of the
1 Sixteen persons, considering the state of the roads, and other circum-
stances, might be termed by a warm friend of the meeting a numerous
attendance.
FIEST BOARD OF OFFICERS. 61
first meeting. In the absence of Mr. Lowell, who was
prevented from attendance by illness, Gen. William H.
Sumner was chosen moderator.
The committee appointed for the purpose of prepar-
ing a constitution and by-laws for the government of
the society made a report of their proceedings, which
was unanimously adopted. The constitution was drawn
up by Gen. Dearborn. 1
At the same meeting, after the Constitution and
By-laws had been read and adopted, the Society was
organized by the choice of the following gentlemen as
officers : —
President.
HENRY A. S. DEARBORN, Roxbury.
Vice-Presidents.
Zebedee Cook, Jun., Dorchester. Robert Manning, Salem.
John C. Gray, Boston. Enoch Bartlett, Roxbury.
Treasurer.
Cheever Newhall, Boston.
Corresponding Secretary.
Jacob Bigelow, M.D., Boston.
Recording Secretary.
Robert L. Emmons, Boston.
Councillors.
John Heard, jun., Boston. Thomas Brewer, Roxbury.
Samuel Downer, Dorchester. William Worthington, Dorchester.
J. W. Webster, ~M.T>., Cambridge. Aaron D. Williams, Roxbury.
Malthus A. Ward, M.D., Salem. Joseph G-. Joy, Boston.
T. W. Harris, M.D., Milton. Oliver Fiske, Worcester.
Benjamin V. French, Boston. Samuel Ward, Roxbury.
J. M. Gourgas, Weston. L. M. Sargent, Boston.
Thomas NuttaU, Cambridge. Joseph Curtis, Roxbury.
Hovey's Magazine, Vol. XVIII. p. 235.
62 .MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Gharlea Tappan, Boston. Thomas Dowse, Cambridgeport.
J. <;. ( ogswell, Northampton. Daniel Waldo, Worcester.
Jonathan Winship, Brighton. William II. Sumner, Dorchester.
John li. Russell, Boston. Elias Phinney, Lexington.
Charles Senior, Roxbury. , Henry A. Breed, Lynn.
Augustus Aspinwall, BrooJcline. Samuel Jaquesjun., Charlestown.
William Lincoln, Worcester. J. P. Leland, Sherburne.
William E. Carter, Cambridge. Benj. W. Crowninshield, Salem.
William Jackson, Plymouth. E. Hersey Derb}-, Salem.
Jacob Tidd, Roxbury. Nathaniel Davenport, Hilton.
William Kenrick, Newton. John Lemist, Roxbury.
Thus the Massachusetts Horticultural Society was
fully organized on the 17th of March, 1829, in the
city of Boston, and at the office of one of its vice-presi-
dents. At this meeting it was announced that upwards
of one hundred and sixty persons had become subscrib-
ers ; while in the first publication of the Society, a pam-
phlet printed in August, 1829, are the names of two
hundred and seventeen members ; and the list, when
the account of the first anniversary, September 10,
1829, was published, had increased to two hundred and
forty-nine, including the names of many of the scientific
and opulent citizens of Boston and vicinity, as well as a
considerable number of the most respected practical cul-
tivators. Indeed, the Society began its career half a cen-
tury ago under the happiest auspices. The praiseworthy
objects of the association, the urgent demand for it to
represent the horticultural enterprise and taste of New
England, and the high character and attainments of its
officers and members, were sure guaranties that it would
be, as it has been, eminently successful.
On the 7th of April the Council appointed Dr. Jacob
Bigelow Professor of Botany, Dr. John W. Webster
Professor of Horticultural Chemistry, and Dr. Thad-
deus William Harris Professor of Entomology.
CONTEMPORARY PERSONS AND EVENTS. 63
On the 28th of April the Society voted to petition the
Legislature for an act of incorporation, which was ap-
proved by the governor on the 12th of June, and
accepted by the Society on the 28th of the same month. 1
It may be of interest to say a word of persons and
events contemporaneous with the formation of the So-
ciety. Boston had then been an incorporated city for
only seven years. Hon. Harrison Gray Otis was its chief
magistrate. The city contained not far from 60,000
inhabitants, or about one-sixth of its present popula-
tion. In area it has now increased more than tenfold,
and includes the residences of many, then deemed coun-
try gentlemen, who were active in forming the Massa-
chusetts Horticultural Society. The valuation of the
city has increased from $80,000,000 to eight times that
amount ; and that of the State, which was then $200,-
000,000, has increased in nearly as great a ratio. The
population of the State has grown from 600,000 to
three times that number. This community was then
earnestly discussing the subjects of building the West-
ern Railroad, completing Bunker Hill Monument, and
the founding of an institution for the instruction of
the blind. The Hon. Levi Lincoln, a practical horticul-
turist, was the Governor of Massachusetts ; and John
Quincy Adams was near the close of his term of office
as President of the United States, Andrew Jackson
having been elected to succeed' him. Jacob Lorillard
was president of the New York Horticultural Society ;
Zaccheus Collins, of the Pennsylvania Society; and
Thomas Andrew Knight presided over that of London.
1 Of this Act Mr. Loudon said (Gardener's Magazine, February, 1830),
" There is something grand and refreshing in the simple form of the Act of
Incorporation, as compared with the highly aristocratical royal charters of
the London, Paris, and Berlin societies." The Act, with several Acts in
addition thereto, may be found in Appendix A.
G4 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
That peculiar feature in the organization of the Soci-
ety, the " Council," copied from the. London Horticul-
tural Society by the New York as well as the Massa-
chusetts Society, deserves a moment's notice ; for almost
all the general management of the property and busi-
ness in the intervals between the stated meetings of the
Society was delegated to it. By the original constitu-
tion and by-laws all papers or communications were to
be referred to the Council ; all rewards to such members
as had advanced the objects of the Society, and all pre-
miums for new inventions or discoveries in horticulture,
or for the growth of new or excellent fruits, flowers, or
vegetables, were to be awarded by it ; and it was its duty
before every election to recommend a list of persons as
officers of the Society for the ensuing year. By an
amendment to the constitution, adopted in June, 1830,
the duty of electing all members, honorary and corre-
sponding, as well as ordinary, who had previously been
chosen at the stated meetings of the Society, was de-
volved upon the Council. This does not appear to have
worked well ; for in a few months we find members
chosen by the Society, and others by the Council ; but
the provision was not formally changed until 1834.
The Council was authorized to meet at such times and
places as it might deem expedient, and to establish by-
laws and regulations for its government, subject to the
approval of the Society; and the corresponding secretary
waa charged with the duty of keeping a record of its
meetings. A portion of these records are printed in
an appendix to the Transactions of the Society for
1870. The object of conferring such powers upon this
body was, apparently, to avoid the necessity of frequent
general meetings of the Society when travelling was
THE COUNCIL. 65
much more difficult than now. It will be noticed, that,
in accordance with the provisions above mentioned, the
committees on Nurseries, Fruit Trees, and Fruit, on
Ornamental Trees, Shrubs, and Flowers, on the Products
of the Kitchen Garden, on the Library, and the Execu-
tive Committee, are in 1829, 1830, and 1831, spoken of
as Standing Committees of the Council, while in 1832
and 1833 they are said to be anointed by the Council ;
but the members of these committees were not necessa-
rily members of the Council, though a large majority
were. In the by-laws adopted in 1835 it was provided
that all standing committees should be chosen at the
annual meeting of the Society : indeed, this course seems
to have been pursued on all occasions after the 24th of
March, 1827, when they were established and appointed
by the Council. The Committee on the Synonymes of
Fruit was established and appointed by the Society on
the 20th of June. The Council itself was found so
cumbrous, that at a meeting on the 5th of December,
1829, it was resolved " That an Executive Committee of
the Council be chosen, to consist of five members, with
authority to exercise all the powers of the Council ; and
said committee to convene at such times and places as
may be deemed expedient, and to make report of its
proceedings to the Council at the stated meetings of
that board, and at such other times as may be required."
Originally the Council consisted of not less than twenty-
four members, besides the president and all other offi-
cers of the society, who were members ex officiis ; but, by
the by-laws of the Society adopted in 1835, the num-
ber was fixed at not more than twenty-four, in addition
to the officers. The constitution adopted in June,
1841, made no provision for a Council.
66 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
At the meeting of the Council on the 24th of March,
1829, a committee was appointed to cause a diploma to
be prepared for the Society ; but it was nearly two years
before it was ready for distribution. The design was a
landscape view, with growing flowers, and gathered fruits
and vegetables, and horticultural implements, in the fore-
ground, and a mansion and trees in the background, and
it was lithographed in the best style of art then known.
The present elaborately engraved diploma was adopted
in 1841. The committee charged with procuring it
was also instructed to procure a seal, the Society having
previously had none, and the beautiful design now used
was adopted ; but the legend was not added until 1847.
The Society, immediately after its organization, faith-
fully devoted itself to its proposed objects as announced
in the constitution. Several other meetings of the
Council, and of the various committees, 1 were convened
at Mr. Cook's office, until a hall was secured for the use
of the Society. John B. Russell was appointed the gen-
eral agent of the Society, and as such superintended the
hall, and took charge of all books given as the nucleus
of a horticultural library, which soon began to flow in
in considerable numbers and of a valuable character.
Liberal premiums were offered for the finest specimens
of fruits, flowers, and vegetables. The hall was fur-
nished with the leading horticultural and agricultural
periodicals of the time, and was open at all hours of the
day. for the accommodation of the members. Seeds,
scions, trees, etc.. were also deposited in the hall, for
distribution among the members.
Weekly horticultural exhibitions were speedily insti-
tuted at the hall every Saturday, which were open to
1 For the members and duties of these committees see Appendix B.
PEOGRESS OF THE SOCIETY. 67
all, and served to effectually advertise the Society, and
to render it popular. The following September the
first annual exhibition was held, — a great display for
the time, — accompanied with an address by the presi-
dent, by a dinner attended by toasts, the reading of
letters from eminent invited guests, and a horticultural
song prepared and sung for the occasion. Honorary,
corresponding, and other members, many of them of the
highest eminence in horticulture, were elected. The
New England Farmer, by formal vote, was authorized
to publish the proceedings from week to week, which
honor it gladly accepted ; a correspondence was at once
established with the principal horticultural societies at
home and abroad ; and thus the infant society grew in
favor with the people, and soon had a name and praise
throughout the world.
In all these labors to establish firmly the foundations
of the infant society President Dearborn was foremost ;
and to him more than to any other person is the Soci-
ety indebted for the prestige and importance which it
so early attained. In the report on the expediency
of establishing an Experimental Garden and Cemetery
at Mount Auburn, drawn up by him in June, 1831, he
gives a summary of the work then accomplished by the
Society, with which we close this chapter : —
" The kind disposition which has been generally evinced to ad-
vance the interests of the Society has had a salutaiy and cheering
influence. Many interesting and instructive communications have
been received, and valuable donations of books, seeds, and plants,
have been made by generous foreigners, and citizens of the United
States. A liberal offer of co-operation has been promptly ten-
dered in both hemispheres, and great advantages are anticipated
from a mutual interchange of good offices.
"A library of considerable extent has been formed, containing
G8 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
many of the most celebrated English and French works on horti-
culture several of which are magnificent ; and the apartments for
the accommodation of the Society have been partially embellished
with beautiful paintings of some of our choice native varieties of
fruits. By weekly exhibitions during eight months of the year, of
fruits, flowers, and esculent vegetables; by awarding premiums
for proficiency in the art of gardening, and the rearing of new,
valuable, or superior products; b}' disseminating intelligence, and
accounts of the proceedings of the Society at its regular and spe-
cial meetings, through the medium of the New England Farmer;
and by an annual festival, and public exhibition of the various
products of horticulture, — an interest has been excited, and a
spirit of inquiry awakened, auspicious to the institution, while a
powerful impulse has been given to all branches of rural industry,
far beyond our most sanguine hopes."
CHAPTER II.
MOUNT AUBUEN PUECHASED BY THE HOETICULTUEAL
SOCIETY, AND AN EXPEEIMENTAL GAEDEN AND CEME-
TEEY ESTABLISHED.
About the year 1825 events occurred which were to
have an important influence upon the prosperity and
usefulness of the Horticultural Society, though it was
then scarcely projected, and only spoken of occasionally
by a few persons. At that time Dr. Jacob Bigelow —
then a young physician of Boston — had his attention
called to certain gross abuses in the practice of sepulture
as it existed under churches and in other receptacles of
the dead in that city. A love of the country, cherished
by the character of his early botanical studies, had led
him to desire the institution of a suburban cemetery
in the neighborhood of Boston, which might at once
lead to a cessation of the burial of the dead in the city,
rob death of a portion of its terrors, and afford to afflicted
survivors some relief amid their bitterest sorrows.
Animated by such philanthropic motives, Dr. Bigelow
invited several gentlemen to meet him at his residence
in Summer Street to consult together on opening a
suburban cemetery, nothing of that kind then existing
in the United States. The persons present at this meet-
ing, which was assembled in 1825, were Jacob Bigelow,
John Lowell, William Sturgis, George Bond, Thomas W.
Ward, John Tappan, Samuel P. Gardiner, and Nathan
69
70 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Hale. Other gentlemen invited 'to attend the meeting
expressed their concurrence in its design, but were not
present. A plan of a cemetery such as Mount Auburn
now is was submitted by Dr. Bigelow to the persons
assembled, and met with their approval. " A committee,
consisting of Messrs. Bond and Tappan, was appointed
to look out for a tract of ground suitable for the desired
purpose, after which the meeting was dissolved. This
committee fixed their attention on an estate in Brook-
line, which afterwards proved to be unattainable ; and
here the subject rested, without definitive action, for
several years."
The preceding account, given by Dr. Bigelow in his
History of Mount Auburn, of the first attempt to
establish a rural cemetery in this country, agrees with
the statements of other writers on the subject. In an
Account of the Proceedings in relation to the Experimen-
tal Garden and the Cemetery of Mount Auburn, writ-
ten, it is believed, by Gen. Dearborn in 183:2, arc found
these words: 1 " A rural cemetery had claimed the atten-
tion of several distinguished gentlemen some ten years
since ; but no definite measures were taken for accom-
plishing an object of such deep interest and general
solicitude among all classes of society. Among the
originators of that laudable yet fruitless attempt, Dr.
Jacob Bigelow was conspicuous for his zealous efforts to
insure success ; and. although disappointed in his expec-
tations at that time, he never abandoned the hope of an
ultimate triumph over the numerous obstacles which
were to be encountered in the achievement of such a
momentous project."
We have further proof that the rural cemetery had
1 Transactions of the Mass. Ilort. Society for 1S32, p. GO.
THE CEMETERY LONG CONTEMPLATED. 71
long been in contemplation, from the words of the Hon.
Edward Everett, 1 published in the Boston papers at the
time such a place of burial was proposed in connection
with an experimental garden under the auspices of the
new Horticultural Society. Mr. Everett said, " The
spot," referring to Mount Auburn, " which has been
selected for this establishment, has not been chosen
without great deliberation, and a reference to every
other place in the vicinity of Boston which has been
named for the same purpose. In fact, the difficulty of
finding a proper place has been for several years the
chief obstacle to the execution of this project." He
said again, " This design, though but recently made pub-
lic, has been long in contemplation, and, as is believed,
has been favored with unusual approbation. It has
drawn forth much unsolicited and earnest concurrence.
It has touched a chord of sympathy which vibrates in
every heart."
Judge Story, in his address at the dedication of the
cemetery at Mount Auburn in 1831, argued the im-
portance of rural cemeteries, from the customs of the
ancients and from the general feelings of mankind in
regard to the burial of then- friends. He added, " Con-
siderations like those which have been suggested have
for a long time turned the thoughts of many distin-
guished citizens to the importance of some more appro-
priate places of sepulture. There is a growing sense
in the community of the inconveniences and painful
associations, not to speak of the unhealthiness, of inter-
ments beneath our churches. The tide which is flow-
ing with such a steady and widening current into the
narrow peninsula of our metropolis not only forbids the
1 Transactions of the Mass. Hort. Soc. for 1832, p. 70.
72 M \SSACnUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
enlargement of the common limits, but admonishes us
of the increasing clangers to the ashes of the dead from
its disturbing movements."
Although the enterprise was delayed by the difficulty
of securing a suitable tract of land, it was not aban-
doned; but inquiries continued to be made, and negotia-
tions attempted, for various grounds advantageously
situated in the vicinity of Boston. Overtures were
twice made by Dr. Bigelow to Augustus Aspinwall for
the beautiful estate held by his family hi Brookline.
Negotiations were also attempted for land on either side
of the Western Avenue, on the branch leading to the
Punch Bowl. These and other attempts failed, either
from the high price at which the land was held, or from
the reluctance of the owners to acquiesce in the use
proposed to be made of the premises.
A tract of land situated in Cambridge and Water-
town, and known as " Stone's Woods " (the title to the
land having remained in the Stone family from an early
period after the settlement of the country), but more
familiarly to the students of Harvard College, by whom,
in common with other admirers of rural scenery, it was
much frequented, as " Sweet Auburn," — a name be-
stowed upon it by Col. George Sullivan and Charles
W. Greene, 1 when college students, — had been pur-
chased in 1825 by George W. Brimmer, who after-
wards enlarged the original purchase by adding to it
several pieces of front land intervening between the
wood and the public road on which the gate now
stands, so that the whole estate included about seventy-
two acres. Dr. Bigelow, who had often visited the
1 Col. Sullivan belonged to the class of 1801, and Mr. Greene to that of
1802.
PURCHASE OF SWEET AUBURN BY MR. BRIMMER. 73
place, both in company with Mr. Brimmer, and before
his purchase, proposed to him in 1830 the purchase of
the whole for an ornamental cemetery ; and notwithstand-
ing his attachment to the place, which he had learned
to love while in college, visiting it as he often did in
company with his fellow-students, 1 so anxious was he
to advance the science and art of horticulture, and to
encourage the foundation of a rural cemetery, that he
liberally offered to surrender the whole estate for these
purposes, at the original cost to himself, although the
land had risen in value, and could probably have been
sold, at no distant period, for a large advance.
Dr. Bigelow, hi his History of Mount Auburn, states
that Mr. Brimmer was prompted to the purchase by his
appreciation of the beautiful in nature, to preserve from
destruction the trees and other natural features of that
attractive spot, until some appropriate use should be
found for it. The Account of the Proceedings in rela-
tion to Mount Auburn, in the Transactions of the Hor-
ticultural Society, differs. "The land," it says, "had
been purchased by Mr. Brimmer, with a view of appro-
priating it to a country residence, and he had planted
out many ornamental trees, and opened several exten-
sive avenues, which rendered it a favorite resort for the
students of the university, and the inhabitants of the
town." 2 The latter statement is doubtless correct ; for
it was corroborated by David Stone of Watertown, who
sold the land to Mr. Brimmer. Mr. Stone added that
Mr. Brimmer went so far as to have the land staked out
1 Mr. Brimmer graduated at Harvard College in the class of 1803.
Among his classmates were the late Rev. Drs. Edward Payson and Samuel
Willard, Professor John Farrar, James Savage, LL.D., and Benjamin
Bussey.
2 Transactions of the Mass. Hort. Soc. for 1832, p. 61.
74 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
on which to place his house and stable. But for some
reason he did not build, and hence became an active
agent in opening the first extensive rural cemetery in
the United States.
At the time of these events there was no ornamented
rural cemetery deserving of notice in the United States,
nor even in the world, on the scale of Mount Auburn as
it now is, and the idea of such an one was entirely new.
In some cases it met with lukewarmness, in others with
prejudice, and in others with direct opposition ; for the
inhabitants of Boston had been accustomed to bury their
dead within the city, or in the village graveyards ; but
now they were asked to convey the precious dust of
their loved ones to the recesses of what seemed to them
a distant wood. It appeared to Dr. Bigelow, that, if
these prejudices were to be overcome, it could best be
done by enlisting in favor of the change the co-opera-
tion of a young, active, and popular society ; and to
what society would he more naturally look than to the
Horticultural Society, of which he was corresponding
secretary? The Hon. John Lowell, who presided at
the first meeting called to establish the Society, was also
one of the eight gentlemen who attended the first meet-
ing at Dr. Bigelow's house in behalf of a rural ceme-
tery, and the tastes and associations of the members of
the Society generally were such as to make them favora-
bly disposed toward the plan. And, if there were any
who questioned the propriety of a participation in such
a movement by the Society, their doubts must have been
removed by the eloquent words of Gen. Dearborn,
probably intended to meet any objections on that score,
in which he described the custom of sepulture outside
of cities, in gardens and groves, among the Jews, the
CEMETERY PROPOSED IN MR. COOK'S ADDRESS. 75
Egyptians, the Greeks and Romans, the Eastern Chris-
tians, and the Turks, and from the times of the patri-
archs down to onr own day.
Dr. Bigelow first commnnicated Mr. Brimmer's prop-
osition to the officers of the Horticultural Society, and
engaged then co-operation as private individuals in his
efforts. The proposition, says Gen. Dearborn, became
a favorite theme of conversation among the members,
and at the close of the address delivered before the
Society on its second anniversary (September 10, 1830),
by Z. Cook, jun., was commended to the attention of
the public in the following words : —
" The improvement and embellishment of grounds devoted to
public uses is deserving of especial consideration, and should
interest the ingenious, the liberal, and tasteful in devising ways
and means for the accomplishment of so desirable an object ; and
I deem this a suitable occasion to direct the attention of our
citizens to a subject I have long wished to see presented to their
consideration, with an eloquence that could not fail to awaken,
and with arguments that will not fail to insure the influence of all
in its execution. I refer to the establishment of a public cemetery
similar in its design to that of Tore La Chaise in the environs of
Paris, to be located in the suburbs of this metropolis. . . .
" I would render such scenes more alluring, more familiar, and
imposing, by the aid of rural embellishments. The skill and taste
of the architect should be exerted in the construction of the requi-
site departments and avenues ; and appropriate trees and plants
should decorate its borders ; the weeping-willow, waving its grace-
ful drapery over the monumental marble, and the sombre foliage
of the cypress, should shade it ; and the undying daisy should
mingle its bright and glowing tints with the native laurel of our
forests."
From the first establishment of the Horticultural
Society, an experimental garden had been considered
indispensable to the full development of its purposes. It
70 .MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
was provided for in its charter, and was especially urged
by (Jen. Dearborn. It was often the subject of anxious
inquiry and interesting discussion ; and the only cause
of delay in commencing the important work on an
extensive scale was the deficiency of adequate means.
"When Mr. Brimmer's proposition was communicated by
Dr. Bigelow to the officers and members of the Society,
and their aid invoked in establishing the cemetery,
they perceived the advantage of connecting it with the
desired experimental garden ; and it was believed not
only that the benefit to the two departments would be
mutual, but that the whole would ultimately offer such
an example of landscape gardening as would be credita-
ble to the Society, and assist in improving the taste of
the public in this highest branch of the art of horticul-
ture. By invitation of Mr. Brimmer, Gen. Dearborn
visited the proposed site of the cemetery to ascertain
whether it would answer the desired purpose. After a
thorough examination of its varied features and advan-
tages, they were perfectly satisfied that it was impossible
to make a more admirable selection in the vicinity of
the metropolis. To further the plan, it was determined
that President Dearborn should draw up a memoir ex-
planatory of the objects for which the land could be
advantageously used, and the means of accomplishing
them.
The account given by Gen. Dearborn of the first
suggestion that the experimental garden and cemetery
be combined, is, that it was made by Dr. Bigelow ; but
the latter gentleman, referring to this statement, ex-
pressly Bays that it is only in part correct. " The ceme-
tery was suggested by Dr. Bigelow; but the experi-
mental garden was a suggestion of other officers and
members of the Horticultural Society."
MEASURES TAKEN FOE THE PUECHASE. 77
Mr. Brimmer's proposition to sell " Sweet Auburn" was
formally communicated to the Horticultural Society at a
meeting at the Exchange Coffee House, on the 27th of
November, 1830, when Thomas H. Perkins, John Lowell,
H. A. S. Dearborn, Jacob Bigelow, George W. Brimmer,
George Bond, and Abbott Lawrence, were appointed a
committee " to inquire into the expediency of purchas-
ing a piece of ground in the vicinity of Boston for a
garden of experiment and a rural cemetery."
During the following winter and spring nothing was
done to promote the object, except that, as the season
opened, many persons were led to visit " Sweet Auburn,"
and to become acquainted with the charming scenery,
as well as to study its advantages for its proposed use.
Numerous meetings were held by the committee, and
several articles appeared in the newspapers of the period
explanatory of the views of the projectors of the experi-
mental garden and cemetery. But the Society had
not, at this time, the means of purchasing land for a
garden and cemetery, however desirable these objects
might be ; and therefore, at a meeting of the Society
on the 4th of June, 1831, the president stated what
measures had been taken by the committee having the
subject under consideration, and offered a resolve, which
was adopted, that the committee be authorized to in-
crease then numbers, and to ask the aid of such other
gentlemen not members of the Society, as in their opin-
ion would forward the objects desired, by being asso-
ciated with them. Accordingly, the committee called
a meeting on the 18th of June, at the rooms of the
Horticultural Society, then in Joy's Building, of gentle-
men who were favorably disposed to the enterprise.
Judge Story was called to the chair, and Edward Everett
78 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
was appointed secretary. There was a good attendance,
and much interest was expressed by various speakers in
reference to the proposed purchase of " Sweet Auburn "
in behalf of the Horticultural Society. The plan agreed
upon was to purchase the estate of Mr. Brimmer as
soon as one hundred subscribers for lots in the cemetery
could be obtained, at sixty dollars each, which would
give the required sum. The following-named persons
were elected members of the committee: Joseph Story,
Daniel Webster, H. A. S. Dearborn, Charles Lowell,
Samuel Appleton, Jacob Bigelow, Edward Everett,
George W. Brimmer, George Bond, A. H. Everett,
Abbott Lawrence, James T. Austin, Franklin Dexter,
Joseph P. Bradlee, Charles Tappan, Charles P. Curtis.
Zebcdee Cook, jun., John Pierpont, L. M. Sargent, and
George W. Pratt. The committee unanimously re-
ported on the 18th of June, through Gen. Dearborn,
who drew up the report, in which the advantages of
the proposed experimental garden and cemetery were
fully and eloquently set forth. That part of their re-
port relating to the method of raising subscriptions for
the experimental garden and cemetery was as follows : —
1. That it is expedient to purchase for a garden and ceme-
tery a tract of land, connnonby known by the name of " Sweet
Auburn," near the road leading from Cambridge to YTatertown,
containing about seventy-two acres, for the sum of six thousand
dollars ; provided this sum can be raised in the manner proposed
in t lie second article of this report.
2. That a subscription be opened for lots of ground in the said
tract, containing not less than two hundred square feet each, at
the price of sixty dollars for each lot, the subscription not to be
binding until one hundred lots are subscribed for.
3. That, when a hundred or more lots are taken, the right of
choice shall be disposed of at an auction, of which seasonable
notice shall be given to the subscribers.
EEPORT OF COMMITTEE. 79
4. That those subscribers who do not offer a premium for the
right of choosing shall have their lots assigned to them by lot.
5. That the fee of the land shall be vested in the Massachu-
setts Horticultural Society, but that the use of the lots, agreeably
to an act of the Legislature respecting the same, shall be secured
to the subscribers, their heirs, and assigns forever.
6. That the land devoted to the purpose of a cemetery shall
contain not less than forty acres.
7. That every subscriber, upon paying for his lot, shall become
a member for life of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society,
without being subject to assessments.
8. That a garden and cemetery committee of nine persons
shall be chosen annually, first by the subscribers, and afterwards
by the Horticultural Society, whose duty it shall be to cause the
necessary surveys and allotments to be made, to assign a suitable
tract of land for the garden of the Society, and to direct all mat-
ters appertaining to the regulation of the garden and cemetery ;
five at least of this committee shall be persons having rights in
the cemetery.
9. That the establishment, including the garden and cemetery,
be called by a definite name, to be supplied by the committee.
The report was accepted, and the committee was
authorized to proceed in the establishment of the gar-
den and cemetery in conformity thereto. Subscription
papers were at once put in circulation through the
committee ; and in a short time seventy-five lots were
taken, and the remaining twenty-five subsequently
found buyers, chiefly through the exertions of Joseph
P. Bradlee, a member of the committee. Thus by the
3d of August, 1831, the one hundred lots were taken
by responsible subscribers, and the success of the long
conceived plan of an ornamented rural cemetery on an
extensive scale was made a certainty.
The subscription paper is now in existence, contain-
ing the names of the persons who purchased the first
hundred lots, and who were thus largely instrumental
80 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
in establishing an institution so important to humanity,
so interesting in a horticultural view, and so intimately
associated with the Christian religion. The entire
number of subscribers was ninety-one, of whom ninety
took a single lot each, and George W. Brimmer ten
lots ; thus making the one hundred requisite for the
purchase. 1
On the 23d of June, 1831, an Act authorizing the
Horticultural Society to hold land for a rural cemetery,
and to lay it out and dedicate it for that purpose, was
approved by Gov. Lincoln. This Act was accepted by
the Society on the 2d of July. 2
On the 3d of August, at a meeting of subscribers
for lots in the cemetery, held at the rooms of the Horti-
cultural Society, the following named persons were elected
members of the garden and cemetery committee, agree-
ably to the eighth section of the terms of subscription :
Joseph Story, Henry A. S. Dearborn, Jacob Bigelow,
George W. Brimmer, Edward Everett, B. A. Gould,
Charles Wells, G. W. Pratt, and George Bond. At
this meeting it was announced that one hundred lots in
the cemetery had been taken ; so that, by the terms of
the subscription, it became obligatory. At the same
time a committee, of which Judge Story was chairman,
was appointed to consider the propriety of consecrating
the cemetery by public religious ceremonies. This
committee reported to the Horticultural Society on the
10th of September, recommending that such consecra-
tion services be held at Mount Auburn on Saturday,
the 24th of September, in the afternoon, and that the
exercises for the occasion be an introductory prayer, an
1 For the names of these subscribers see Appendix C.
2 For this and a supplementary Act see Appendix D.
PLACE OF CONSECRATION. 81
address, and a closing prayer, with an original hymn, to
be sung by the assembly, and other appropriate music.
This report was accepted, and a consecrating commit-
tee of nine members, viz., Hon. Joseph Story, II. A.
S. Dearborn, Charles P. Curtis, Rev. Charles Lowell,
Zebedee Cook, jun., -J. T. Buckingham, George W.
Brimmer, George W. Pratt, and Z. B. Adams, was chosen
to make the arrangements recommended. Messrs.
Curtis, Buckingham, and Pratt were appointed a
sub-committee to invite the orator and clergymen,
and to provide an appropriate hymn and suitable
music. The persons designated to prepare the grounds
at Mount Auburn, and to make arrangements for the
accommodation of the company, were Messrs. Dear-
born, Brimmer, and Cook ; while Mr. Pratt and Mr.
Cook were made a committee to appoint suitable mar-
shals and other officers, and to arrange all matters of
police for the occasion.
The account of the place of consecration as printed
at the time is as follows : —
"The site selected for the performance of the consecration cere-
monies was a deep circular dell, formed by the united bases of
four beautiful hills, in the south-western portion of the cemetery
grounds. In the centre was a small pool supplied by perennial
springs, and from its margin the acclivities on three sides grace-
fully rose for more than a hundred feet in extent, presenting a
magnificent amphitheatre, sufficiently capacious to accommodate
from six to eight thousand spectators. The flanks and summits of
each eminence being covered with majestic forest trees, shrubs,
and ' many a wood flower wild,' an area of more than six hundred
feet in circuit, extending up the broad escarpments for at least
seventy feet, was divested of the underwood, and lined with seven
ranges of seats for the accommodation of the audience. Near the
northern margin of the miniature lake a rostrum was formed, a few
feet above the surface of the water, for the orator, clergy, and offi-
82 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ccrs of the Horticultural Society. This w:i> decorated with ever-
greens, giving it the appearance of a natural bower open towards
the south. On the declivity of the fourth hill, and on the right of
the rostrum, ranges of seats were placed, as an orchestra, for the
band of music, choristers, and the various committees of arrange-
ments."
"The day was cloudless, and the deep blue vault of heaven
canopied the immense area with a dome of more resplendent gran-
deur than all that genius can conceive, or art accomplish. Whis-
pering zephyrs rustled the many twinkling leaves of those towering
groves which crowned the surrounding heights ; the glorious sun
gilded with his cheering beams the smiling landscape; while far
and wide over the deep and expanded glen a thickened, flicker-
ing shadow screened with balmy freshness the assembled multi-
tude, who listened with intense and elevated thoughts to the fer-
vent prayer, the eloquent appeal, the thrilling hymn of praise, and
those swelling notes of music which pealed sublime through every
vale and tufted hill of that sacred garden of the dead. Such was
the solemn stillness, so motionless the surface of the dark, deep
pool, that it mirrored the steep, receding acclivities, and the innu-
merable spectators who thronged the encircling seats.
" At twelve o'clock, a procession was formed of the officers of
the Societ}', as an escort to the orator and officiating clergy,
which, preceded by the band, entered the rostrum through the
eastern vale. The effect was grand and imposing, calling up vivid
recollections of those solemn funeral rites which were performed
by the patriarchs of old in the field of Machpelah, or the assem-
bled Athenians in the venerable groves of the Ceramicus."
The order of performances was as follows : —
1. Instrumental music, by the Boston Band.
2. Introductory Prayer, by the Eev. Dr. Ware.
3. Ilynin, written by the Rev. Mr. Pierpont.
To thee, O God. in humble trust.
Our hearts their cheerful incense burn
For this thy word, " Thou art of dust,
Ami unto dust shall thou return."
For whal were life, life's work all done,
The hopes, joys, loves, that cling to clay,
All. all departed, one by one,
And yet life's load borne on for aye !
CONSECRATION SERVICES. 83
Decay! decay! 'tis stamped on all;
All bloom in flower and flesh shall fade:
Ye whispering trees, when we shall fall,
Be our long sleep beneath your shade !
Here to thy bosom, mother Earth,
Take back in peace what thou hast given ;
And all that is of heavenly birth,
O God, in peace, recall to heaven !
4. Address, by the Hon. Joseph Story.
5. Concluding prayer, by the Rev. Mr. Pierpont.
G. Music,by the Band.
Judge Story, in his address, thus spoke of the con-
nection of the Society with Mount Auburn : —
" The Legislature of this Commonwealth, with a parental fore-
sight, has clothed the Horticultural Societ} 7 with authority (if I
may use its own language) to make a perpetual dedication of this
spot as a rural cemetery or buiying ground, and to plant and em-
bellish it with shrubbery and flowers, and trees and walks, and
other rural ornaments. And I stand here, by the order and in
behalf of this Society, to declare that by these services it is to be
deemed henceforth and forever so dedicated. Mount Auburn, in
the noblest sense, belongs no longer to the living, but to the dead.
It is a sacred, it is an eternal trust. It is consecrated ground.
May it remain forever inviolate ! "
The scene was thus described in the Boston Courier
of the time, doubtless by Joseph T. Buckingham, the
editor, who was one of the consecrating committee, and
who entered into the full spirit of the occasion and of
the enterprise.
"An unclouded sun, and an atmosphere purified by the showers
of the preceding night, combined to make the day one of the most
delightful we ever experience at this season of the year. It is
unnecessary for us to say that the address of Judge Story was per-
tinent to the occasion ; for, if the name of the orator were not suffi-
cient, the perfect silence of the multitude, enabling him to be
heard with distinctness at the most distant part of the beautiful
84 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
amphitheatre in which the services were performed, will be suffi-
cient testimony to its worth and beauty. Neither is it in our
pow.r to furnish any adequate description of the effect produced
by the music of the thousand voices which joined in the hymn
as it swelled in chastened melody from the bottom of the glen,
and, like the spirit of devotion, found an echo in every heart, and
pervaded the whole scene."
• • Mount Auburn has been little known to the citizens of Bos-
ton ; but it has now become holy ground, and
' Sweet Auburn, loveliest village of the plain,' —
a village of the quick and the silent, where Nature throws an air
of cheerfulness over the labors of Death, — will soon be a place of
more general resort, both for ourselves and for strangers, than any
other spot in the vicinity. Where else shall we go with the mus-
ing- of sadness, or for the indulgence of grief; where to cool the
burning brow of ambition, or relieve the swelling heart of dis-
appointment? We can find no better spot for the rambles of
curiosity, health, or pleasure, none sweeter for the whispers of
affection among the living, none lovelier for the last rest of our
kindred."
Truly, the two thousand assembled on that day did
stand on holy ground, and that which will remain sa-
cred forever. They found it good, on that memorable
day. to go to the house of mourning. It was a kind of
sabbath, and fitted them for the approaching rest of
holy time. Far-seeing men and women engaged in the
solemnities of that day ; but their work has proved
more interesting and important than their high expecta-
tions pronounced it at that time, and wave after wave
of interest swells over the silent and now populous city
of the dead, and will thus continue until " the angel
shall swear, by Him that liveth for ever and ever, that
time shall be no longer."
CHAPTER III.
THE PROGRESS OF MOUNT AUBURN" UNDER THE AUSPICES
OF THE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY, AND THE SEPARA-
TION OF THE TWO INTERESTS BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT.
The terms of subscription for a garden and cemetery
close with the provision " that the establishment be
called by a definite name, to be supplied by the Commit-
tee." We have no record of the formal adoption of the
name of Mount Auburn from that of the principal
eminence in the grounds — which rises one hundred and
twenty-five feet above the level of Charles River, and is
now crowned by the granite tower erected from Dr.
Bigelow's design — but it is first applied to the cemetery
in the report of the Committee, made on the 10th of
September, 1831, recommending a public consecration.
At the first meeting of the Garden and Cemetery
Committee, on the 8th of August, Gen. Dearborn, Dr.
Bigelow, and Mr. Brimmer were appointed a sub-com-
mittee to procure an accurate topographical survey of
Mount Auburn, and to report a plan for laying out the
grounds. At the annual meeting of the Society, Octo-
ber 1, 1831, the committee, through then chairman,
made a full and encouraging report. They stated that a
skilful civil engineer had been employed to make an
accurate topographical survey, and to locate the numer-
ous avenues which were found necessary for conven-
ience and embellishment. A map was so far perfected
85
86 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
as to be submitted for inspection, to exhibit the general
outlines of the projected improvements ; but consid-
erable labor was yet required hi clearing out the prin-
cipal avenues and footpaths before the sites of the
public and private cemetery squares could be definitely
established, and designated on the plan. As the season
for rural labor was far advanced, it was not considered
expedient to commence the construction of the avenues
before the spring ; but they could be divested of the
underwood, and the whole of the grounds so far cleared
up, as to give them the appearance of a park, within
the autumn. It was thought that the lots might be
assigned within twenty days. Models and drawings of
the Egyptian gateway, and of a Gothic and a Grecian
tower, one of which it was proposed to erect on the
summit of the highest hill, were offered for examina-
tion. The committee had been cheered in the dis-
charge of its duties by the deep interest manifested for
the success of an undertaking so important to the pros-
perity of the Horticultural Society, and so honorable to
the country. The report concluded with the statement
of the plans of the committee for the rapid progress
and speedy development of the cemetery and garden, in
regard to both which they indulged the most sanguine
expectations. At this meeting it was voted that the
Garden and Cemetery Committee be instructed to ap-
propriate such funds as might be realized from the sale
of lots in the cemetery for the erection of such build-
ings as they might see proper.
Gen. Dearborn, the chairman of the sub-committee
to lay out the grounds, devoted himself to this work
most assiduously, spending the greater part of the
autumn at Mount Auburn, in laboring with hands
AVENUES AND PATHS LAID OUT. 87
as well as mind, without money and without price.
The avenues and paths were planned, as far as possi-
ble, to conform to the natural surface of the ground.
Curved or winding courses were generally adopted,
both for picturesque effect, and for easy approach to
the lots. The avenues for carriages were made about
eighteen feet wide, and the footpaths about five, the
lots being set back six feet from the paths or avenues.
The standard size of lots was fixed at twenty feet by
fifteen, which size has never been changed. Alexander
Wadsworth, the civil engineer employed to make the
survey of Mount Auburn, in accordance with the plan
of Gen. Dearborn, approved by the other members of
the sub-committee, in the autumn of 1831 staked out
the avenues and paths in that part of the grounds sit-
uated east of a line drawn north and south through
where the chapel now stands, with the exception of
the north-eastern part, which was designed for the ex-
perimental garden.
Gen. Dearborn transplanted from his nurseries in
Roxbury a large number of young forest trees, which
he distributed through the entire front of the cemetery.
A part of these have since been moved and re-arranged,
and they are now among the most beautiful ornaments
of the place. In view of this and other services ren-
dered by him, the Garden and Cemetery Committee, on
the 2d of December, 1831, at the instance of Mr.
Brimmer,
" Voted, That in consideration of the very acceptable ser-
vices rendered by Gen. Dearborn at Mount Auburn, and for the
assiduity he has manifested in carrying into effect the purposes
and designs of the committee, the lot selected by him in the
grounds appropriated to the cemetery be presented to him, in be-
88 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
half of the proprietors, and that the same shall be conveyed to
him and his heirs in the manner prescribed by the Rules and
Regulations of the Association, as a gratuity, and that Mr. Cook
be requested to notify him of the same."
While Gen. Dearborn, as the active working member
of the committee, was engaged in laying out the grounds.
Dr. Bigclow visited the place as often as the duties of
his profession would allow. Mr. Brimmer was a fre-
quent visitor, and Judge Story was often there, some-
times spending hours, and manifesting a deep interest
in the enterprise, as did also Samuel Applcton.
Gen. Dearborn, having been elected a member of
Congress, was compelled to leave for Washington the
last of November, and was unable to return to his
home until the following summer. But before his
departure he addressed a letter to Mr. Brimmer, giving
his views in regard to laying out the grounds, in a man-
ner well illustrating his zeal for the speedy progress of
the enterprise. After stating the importance of com-
mencing the carriage-avenues and paths early in the
spring, he gave minute directions for their formation,
and for planting trees, shrubs, and flowers on their mar-
gins ; for building a fence around the land ; preparing
the ground for the experimental garden ; engaging a
gardener, and building a cottage for him ; and building
the Egyptian gateway ; and carefully noted the por-
tions of the work most important to be first accom-
plished, lie concluded by asking Mr. Brimmer to
show his letter to Dr. Bigelow, and leave it with him if
he went South; "for the doctor is an army iu our
cause."
At a meeting of the Garden and Cemetery Commit-
tee, held November 3, 1831, it was voted, that Dr.
CHOICE OF LOTS SOLD. 89
Bigelow be authorized to have a plan of the grounds
of Mount Auburn lithographed, and to give names to
such ponds, avenues, or places as required them ; also
to alter any names before affixed. In the execution
of the latter duty, similar to one previously ordered by
the sub-committee, and for which his early studies
and tastes had eminently qualified him, Dr. Bigelow
adopted the beautiful and appropriate names of trees
and shrubs for the paths and avenues ; and this course
has since been followed, with occasional deviations,
made to gratify the desire of parties interested. Mr.
Wadsworth's plan of the grounds was submitted and
accepted at this meeting, and afterwards lithographed
on a reduced scale. At the same meeting a vote was
passed to permit single interments to be made in the
grounds by persons not proprietors. The enclosure,
since named St. James's lot, on Cypress Avenue, was
shortly after set off for the purpose, and surrounded
with a slight fence.
About one hundred lots at Mount Auburn having
been surveyed, it was voted, in November, to offer at
auction to proprietors, for a premium, the right of
choice among the lots laid out. Liberal bids were
made at this auction, the highest of one hundred dol-
lars, by Samuel Appleton ; and the next, fifty dollars,
by Benjamin Adams. The whole proceeds of the sale,
after deducting auction expenses, were $944.92.
It will be remembered that on the 3d of August,
1831, the one hundred lots necessary to be purchased
to secure the grounds of Mount Auburn were disposed
of. But such was the demand for lots, that, by the
18th of November of the same year, upwards of twenty
additional lots were taken. On this last-mentioned
90 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
date the deeds, more than one hundred and twenty in
number, giving the various purchasers a right to their
lots, were signed by II. A. S. Dearborn as president of
the Massachusetts Horticultural Society.
The original price of lots was sixty dollars for three
hundred square feet ; and a certain number of lots
were kept surveyed, in anticipation of sales at this
price. It was, however, voted, November 8, 1831,
that, " if an applicant choose to have a new lot as-
signed to him, the committee may, if they sec fit, grant
him a new lot on his paying ten dollars additional to
his former dues." The addition subsequently required
was twenty dollars. The price of a surveyed lot has
been from time to time increased, the advance being
founded on the greater value of the cemetery, and the
difference in interest to early purchasers.
On the opening of the spring of 1832, Gen. Dear-
born again took hold of the work at Mount Auburn, so
congenial to his taste, with the same unwearied energy
and disinterested enthusiasm as in the previous year.
John B. Russell, one of the founders of the Society, in
his Reminiscences of the Massachusetts Horticultural
Society, 1 speaking of Gen. Dearborn, says, " As the
fimds at his command were limited, he hired only a few
laborers, and superintended and worked with them him-
self. I remember scemg him, hoe in hand, day after
day. at the head of his laborers, levelling and grading
the walks, taking his dinner with him, which he would
step into the AYycth House across the road to eat."
Similar recollections were expressed by Mr. David
Stone, who sold the greater part of the land to Mr.
Brimmer, and who worked many months with Gen.
1 Tilton's Journal of Horticulture, Vol. VU. p. 278.
AVENUES AND PATHS CONSTEUCTED. 91
Dearborn, and by Miss Wyeth, who lived in the house
where he dined, and was a constant witness of his un-
requited toil, confirming the opinion of Mr. Russell, that
the practical success of Mount Auburn is due more to
the far-seeing, persistent, and personal labors of Gen.
Dearborn than to those of any other person. His daily
private journal, kept at this period, indicates, that, for
more than one season, he spent the greater part of his
time in active mental and physical service at Mount
Auburn.
Comparatively few of the avenues and paths laid out
at Mount Auburn in the summer and autumn of 1831
were constructed at that time ; but in the following
spring most of them were completed, affording a car-
riage-drive of nearly three miles, and an equal extent
of foot-walks, which rendered it the pleasantest place
of resort in the vicinity of Boston. By midsummer
carriages passed in great numbers to every part of the
ground then owned by the Society, and ascended to the
summit of the hill. Early in August the Garden and
Cemetery Committee caused other avenues to be laid out
and constructed, and a road to be made on the eastern
side of the cemetery, which united the highways on the
south and north-east of the grounds, thus completing
the line of centre communication with the main road
from Boston to Watertown, whereby a new and most
interesting approach to the cemetery was opened from
Brighton, Brookline, Roxbury, and other towns south of
Charles River, as well as from Boston.
In the month of May, Messrs. Cook and Bond were
appointed a committee to decide upon the form of a fence
to enclose the grounds at Mount Auburn. A contract
was soon afterwards made for a substantial fence, seven
92 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
feet high, of rough sawed pales, which enclosed the
whole ground. On the 1st of September, 1832, Gen.
Dearborn, Dr. Bigelow, and Mr. Brimmer were appointed
a committee to procure the erection of a gateway, with
lodges for the porter and superintendent at the princi-
pal entrance, the funds being deemed sufficient to erect
one of wood with some reference to ornament. The
design adopted was by Dr. Bigelow, in the Egyptian
style, mostly taken from some of the best examples in
Dcnderah and Karnac. This gateway was painted in
imitation of granite, and stood until 18-12, when it was
replaced by the present stone gateway, of the same
design, which, from the size of the stones and the solidity
of the structure, is entitled to a duration of a thousand
years.
In September of the same year, the success of the
enterprise being no longer doubtful, it was deemed ex-
pedient to secure the addition of about twenty-five acres
of land on the westerly side of the cemetery, belonging
to David Stone and others, and Ann Cutter. For this
purpose the committee was authorized by the Society, on
the 29th of September, to borrow a sufficient sum of
money, to be reimbursed, with interest, out of the first
proceeds of cemetery lots. This loan, to the amount
of forty-four hundred dollars, was subscribed by indi-
viduals who were proprietors of lots. It was secured
by mortgage of the land purchased, and no lots were
sold from it until the encumbrance was removed. By
this purchase a valuable tract of land was secured, the
sale of which has been an important element in the
prosperity of both the Cemetery and the Horticultural
Society.
Other improvements effected during the year were
FIRST INTERMENTS. 93
the excavation of the upper Garden Pond to a sufficient
depth to afford a constant sheet of water, and the con-
struction of an embankment and avenues, with a border
for flowers all around it. In the centre an island was
formed connected with the avenue by a bridge, and
another bridge was thrown over the outlet. Arrange-
ments were also made for excavating Forest and Con-
secration Dell Ponds to a greater depth, and surrounding
them with embellished pathways like those of Garden
Pond. David Haggerston, who had previously carried
on a commercial garden, known as the " Charlestown
Vineyard," was engaged as superintendent and gardener
of the experimental garden and cemetery. A cottage
for his accommodation had been raised, and was ex-
pected to be finished by the first of March, 1833, when
he would enter upon his duties.
A receiving-tomb, with walls formed of granite, and
covered with massive blocks of stone, and several pri-
vate tombs, had been constructed ; a number of superb
marble and granite monuments had been erected ; and
many lots enclosed by iron fences, or prepared for plant-
ing trees, shrubs, and flowers. The first interment in
Mount Auburn was that of a child of Mr. James Boyd,
on Mountain Avenue, July 6, 1832; the second, that
of Mrs. Mary Hastings, six days later. The first monu-
ment erected was that to the memory of Hannah
Adams, a native of Medfield, Mass., one of the first
female writers of America, and of considerable distinc-
tion for her historical works. The funds for erecting
this monument were raised through a subscription, by
ladies in Boston, and in view of their public spirit it
was voted that the Committee on Surveys appropriate a
piece of land for the purpose of depositing her remains ;
04 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and on the 2d of December the treasurer was ordered
to pay thirty-five dollars for an iron fence around her
monument.
The Horticultural Society from the outset exerted its
whole influence to make Mount Auburn a model in all
respects ; and the Garden and Cemetery Committee
appended to their account of the work done in 1832,
from which many of the preceding statements have been
derived, some valuable Suggestions as to the Manner
of Laying out and Improving the Cemetery Lots at
Mount Auburn, designed to secure a general system in
the mode of constructing tombs, enclosing lots, and
ornamenting them with trees, shrubs, and flowers. It
was desired that all monuments should be of marble or
granite ; and that, when they consisted of slabs, they
should be placed horizontally, and not hi a perpendic-
ular position ; and that all railings or enclosures of lots
should be light, neat, and symmetrical. It was a part
of the original design, though not obligatory, that in-
terments should be in single graves, rather than in
tombs, the extent of the cemetery affording ample room
for this method ; but recommendations were given as to
the best mode of constructing tombs, as well as graves,
when the former were preferred. It was advised that
the area of the lots should not be planted with trees or
shrubs, but left free and open ; that plants used for edg-
ings should be of very humble character ; and that
hedges should be avoided, as liable to become so filled
with wood as to present a mass of branches with but
little verdure, while the ground would be filled with
roots, and the monuments would be hidden from view.
Directions were also given for securing a verdant surface
of turf, and for forming the borders for flowers and
PEOGEESS OF THE CEMETEEY. 95
ornamental trees and shrubs. The committee sum up
with the remark, that " the general appearance of the
whole grounds should be that of a well-managed park,
and the lots only so far ornamented with shrubs and
flowers as to constitute rich borders to the avenues and
pathways, without giving to them the aspect of a dense
and wild coppice, or a neglected garden, whose trees
and plants have so multiplied and interlaced their
roots and branches, as to completely destroy all that airi-
ness, grace, and luxuriance of growth, which good taste
demands," — principles which, too long overlooked, are
at last recognized as the only true grounds of proced-
ure in the formation of rural cemeteries.
In the autumn of 1831 orders were sent to London
and Paris for such books as could be procured in rela-
tion to cemeteries and funeral monuments ; and on the
8th of September, 1832, Gen. Dearborn made a report
on three of these books which had been received, re-
lating principally to the Cemetery of Pere La Chaise.
A portion of the historical and descriptive account of
that celebrated burial-place was translated by Gen.
Dearborn, and appended to this report, in the belief that
it would be interesting to the members of the Society
and to all who had any part in, or had visited the simi-
lar establishment at Mount Auburn. The following
passage from this report will further illustrate Gen.
Dearborn's zeal in behalf of the garden and cemetery : —
" It will be perceived, from the accompanying account of Pere
La Chaise, that many years had passed by before that magnificent
cemetery claimed public attention, and became a resort of the
admirers of the arts, the opulent and enlightened, as well as the
connnon place of sepulture for the most illustrious in letters,
science, and arms, and of the humblest citizens of Paris. A year
96 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
has not vit elapsed since the consecration of Mount Auburn, and
over one hundred and seventy lots have been purchased, which is
more than were sold at Pere La Chaise in eight years from its
foundation. As to the result of the undertaking there is, there-
fore, no longer any doubt, and we should be encouraged in the
most active and Liberal exertions for completely developing the
entire plan in all its interesting and important departments."
At this time the experimental garden was deemed
as certain to succeed as the cemetery. The land ap-
propriated for this purpose was the north-easterly part
of the grounds, east of Central Avenue, and separated
from the interior woodland of the portion set apart as
a cemetery by the long water-course which expanded
into Garden Pond, forming a natural boundary. Gar-
den Pond is now transformed into a circular basin, and
know as Halcyon Lake ; but its name for many years
perpetuated the memory of the use to which this part
of the grounds was devoted, as that of Garden Avenue
still docs. Previous to 1856, this avenue was farther
from the street than it now is, having probably been
the main avenue in the garden. It was intended that
the boundary between the garden and cemetery should
be a line of demarcation, rather than of disconnection,
and that the ornamental grounds of both should be ap-
parently blended, and the walks so intercommunicate'
as to afford an uninterrupted range over both, as one
common domain. The area of the garden was about
thirty-two acres, and at the time of the purchase by
the Horticultural Society the ground was under cultiva-
tion. In 180 2 it was laid out by Gen. Dearborn, the
paths and avenues constructed, and bordered with turf,
in readiness for cultivation and planting with fruit and
ornamental trees. In his report on the 8th of Septem-
THE EXPERIMENTAL GARDEN. 97
ber, 1832, Gen. Dearborn suggested, that as the funds
which had been derived from the sale of cemetery lots
had been appropriated for the purchase of land, the
construction of avenues and fences, and other indispen-
sable purposes, it might be expedient to raise a com-
mittee authorized to obtain funds by subscription to
enable the Society to hasten its improvements, instead
of delaying them for even a few years until the pro-
ceeds of the cemetery lots supplied the means, as a
comparatively small sum, if then placed at the disposal
of the Society, would enable it to present an advanced
and interesting garden even during the next year, and
to lay such a foundation for its gradual extension as
would warrant the speedy realization of all the expecta-
tions of the Society, and give great public satisfaction.
In accordance with this suggestion, Joseph P. Brad-
lee, George W. Pratt, and Elijah Vose, were appointed
a committee to obtain by subscription funds for the
immediate improvement of the grounds appropriated as
a garden of experiment ; but it does not appear that
this movement met with any success. The friends of
the garden were not, however, discouraged by a lack of
means, but went on to the best of their ability with the
funds at command. From the commencement of the
Society, frequent donations of plants and seeds had
been received from lovers of horticulture and botany in
foreign countries and in other parts of our own country,
especially from the corresponding members, for which
the Society made return, as far as in its power, in
plants, scions, or seeds of native origin. These gifts
had previously been distributed among the members ;
but now they were retained for trial in the experimental
garden ; the first instance of this disposition of such a
98 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
present being that of a box of seeds received from Pro-
fessor Tcnorc of the Botanic Garden at Naples, through
Capt. M. C. Perry of the United States Ship Concord,
a corresponding member of the Society, and interested
in botanical and horticultural pursuits, it being on the
22d of December, 1832, resolved that this box of seeds
be confided to the care of Mr. Haggerston. Seeds of
Magnolia acuminata, from Dr. S. P. Hildreth of Ma-
rietta, O., an honorary member of the Society, on the
30th of March, 1833, received the same disposition, as
did all similar donations as long as the garden remained
in possession of the Society. On the 18th of May
1833, the president of the Society announced donations
of seeds from David Porter, Esq., Charge d' Affaires of
the United States at the Ottoman Porte ; J. Fay, gar-
dener at the public grounds of the Capitol and Presi-
dent's house, Washington, D. C. ; Alexander Walsh
of New York ; Col. T. H. Perkins of Boston ; and
the London Horticultural Society, all of which, by vote
of the Society, were placed in charge of the gardener
at Mount Auburn, for cultivation. Gen. Dearborn also
added to this report the following statement concern-
ing the Society's garden : —
" I am happy to announce to the Society, that the plan of the
experimental garden at Mount Auburn is in progress, and will
soon be carried completely into effect. Mr. Haggerston. the gar-
dener, moved into the cottage earl}' in the last month, and, with
two laborers, has been constantly and most industriously employed
in setting out over one thousand and three hundred forest, orna-
mental, and fruit trees, planting culinary vegetables, and preparing
hotbeds for receiving a great variety of useful plants, which are
intended to be distributed over the various compartments of the
garden, and on borders of the avenues and paths. Among the
seeds planted are four hundred and fifty varieties which have been
PRODUCTS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL GARDEN. 99
sent to the Society from Europe, Asia, and South America. A
porter has been engaged, who has charge of the main gateway,
and who, being a skilful practical gardener, will aid in the labors
of cultivation in the grounds of the establishment."
On the 22d of June, 1833, according to the report of
the exhibition in the New England Farmer, there were
" furnished from the Society's experimental garden at
Cambridge, by Mr. Haggerston, being the first fruits of
the garden for the members, Rose Demi Longue Rad-
ish, — seeds from the London Horticultural Society,
tasted, and found to be very fine, and recommended
for cultivation, — also Normandy Cress from the Soci-
ety's garden." Mr. Haggerston further gave notice
that there would be for distribution on the next Satur-
day, at the hall of the Society, from their garden at
Mount Auburn, plants of three varieties of cauliflower,
and seven varieties of broccoli, seeds of which wer$
received from the London Horticultural Society and
from the Botanical Society of the Kingdom of Naples ;
and we accordingly find that on the 29th of June he
sent for distribution among the members of the Society
plants of Cauliflower di Palermo di Marzo tempo ; C.
di Palermo Tardive, and C. Palermo Primitive ; Broccoli
di Marzo tempo, B. Primitive, B. Tardive, and B. Ro-
mana, from the Naples Society ; and Purple Transpar-
ent or Glass Kohl Rabi and Knight's Broccoli, from the
London Society. On the 20th of July specimens of
seven varieties of peas were exhibited by Mr. Hag-
gerston, from the seed received from Naples. Two
weeks later the Committee on the Products of the
Kitchen Garden reported the exhibition by Mr. Hag-
gerston of twelve new varieties of peas, beans, and
other vegetables, with remarks upon their qualities, the
100 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
seeds having mostly been received from Naples. In
August and September the reports mention the exhibi-
tion of many flowers, such as Schizanthus, Petunia,
Coreopsis, Silene, Oenothera, Ammobium, Vicia, Agera-
tum, Zinnia, Cacalia, Datura, Dolichos, Iberis, Hibiscus,
Delphinium, Malope, Dracocephalum, and Thunbergia,
of different species, and many varieties of Dahlias. At
the Annual Exhibition, on the 18th of September, the
floral decorations of the hall, " which did great credit
to the taste of the committee," w r ere furnished, in part,
from the Society's garden at Mount Auburn. Septem-
ber 28 there were shown the " Cephalonia Melon, an
oblong, pointed, yellow variety of the musk melon ;
Beechwood melon, the seed from the London Horticul-
tural Society, an oval variety of the musk melon, of a
green color, flesh of a deep grass green, of a most deli-
cious sweet and musky flavor ; also the Citron water
melon, excellent for preserving, produced from seeds
sent by Mr. Milne of New York." October 26, Mr.
Haggerston exhibited Carotte Violette, the seed from
the London Horticultural Society. On the 19th of
July, 1833, Alexander Walsh of Lansingburgh, N.Y.,
in presenting to the Society a large parcel of seeds of
the Corydalis fungosa, or Woad Fringe (now Adlumia
cirrhosa, or Mountain Fringe), to be planted in Mount
Auburn Garden, added, " I purpose visiting your splen-
did garden," for which he was propagating trees and
shrubs ; and in the New England Farmer, January 29,
1834, the place is spoken of as a " beautiful experi-
mental garden."
In 1834 J. W. Russell was appointed gardener and
superintendent at Mount Auburn, Mr. Ilaixgcrston hav-
ing taken charge of the extensive garden and conserva-
FLOWEES FROM THE EXPERIMENTAL GARDEN". 101
tories formed by John P. dishing at Watertown. On
the 2d of August Mr. Russell exhibited eight new va-
rieties of Balsams, on the 9th Plectocephalus (Centaurea)
Americanus, Asters, and Tropaeolums ; and on the 16th
of August and the 13th of September bouquets are re-
ported from Mount Auburn. At the Annual Exhibi-
tion, held in Faneuil Hall, September 17, 18, and 19,
elegant bouquets were contributed from the Society's
garden, and some of the wreaths and cut flowers for
decorating the hall were furnished from the same place.
Even after the separation of the cemetery from the
Horticultural Society, the child remembered its parent ;
for we find the record of the exhibition, on the 5th of
September, 1835, of a beautiful bouquet of new varie-
ties of China Asters, tastefully arranged in pyramidal
form, by Mr. Russell, and at the Annual Exhibition in
the Odeon, September 16 and 17, of a profusion of cut
flowers from Mount Auburn Garden.
These notices of the products of the experimental
garden, which we have gleaned from the reports of the
Society's exhibitions in the New England Farmer, are
sufficient to show that its friends were in earnest in
founding and supporting it. But though its establish-
ment was a leading motive in the purchase of Mount
Auburn, 1 and though its advantages were set forth in
reports and addresses, the Society had no funds spe-
cially appropriated for its support, and most of the pro-
prietors of cemetery lots probably felt an indifference, if
not a positive aversion, to the idea of an experimental
1 An indication of the relative importance in which the two branches of
the establishment at Mount Auburn were held by the Horticultural Society
may be found in the fact that in their publications it is almost invariably
spoken of as the Garden and Cemetery, the cemetery being very seldom
placed first.
102 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
garden. 1 Whether it could have been carried on suc-
cessfully in the face of these difficulties, if the union
between the Society and the proprietors of lots had
continued, cannot be told ; but the terms of separation
of these two hit crests put an end to the garden, which
was no doubt less regretted by those most interested in
that department than it would have been, had not the
experience of two seasons shown that the soil was not
well adapted to the purpose of an experimental gar-
den. And, if asked to assign a reason why the Society
has not established such a garden since its means have
been more ample, we should reply that at no time have
they been adequate to the maintenance of such an es-
tablishment as would be creditable to the Society ; * 2 and
it has been felt that the improvement of horticulture
could be better promoted by liberal premiums for the
encouragement of individual efforts in horticultural art,
by the provision of suitable halls for the exhibition of
improved products, and by the collection of a horti-
cultural library, than by embarking in an enterprise
not only expensive, but extremely hazardous otherwise.
The prizes offered by the Society have encouraged the
establishment of not one, but many, experimental gar-
dens.
1 The only action of the Garden and Cemetery Committee, specially
relating to the garden, which we find on the records of the committee, is
comprised in a vote on the oOth of August, 1834, appointing Messrs. Bradlee
and Coot and such other memhers of the Society as they might see tit to
associate with them, a committee to devise a plan for rendering the garden
more productive, and to receive donations of plants, etc., and cause them to
l»' sel "in in the garden; and in a vote, on the 27th of October of the same
year, appointing Mr. Vose and Mr. Bradlee a committee to examine the
garden and Garden Pond, and report what improvements ought in their
opinion to be made therein to render the garden productive and profitable.
8 The London Horticultural Society's garden was commenced a1 the end
of the year 1818, and up to May. is:>7, £40.000 had been expended on it.
Tie' extent of the garden at Chiswick was about the same as of that at
Mount Auburn.
FIRST ANNUAL REPORT. 103
Soon after the proposal of Mr. Brimmer to sell
"Sweet Auburn" for a rural cemetery, Gen. Dearborn
drew up a Memoir explanatory of the great objects for
which the land could be advantageously used, and the
means of accomplishing them. Besides the Experi-
mental Garden and Cemetery, the plan recommended
hi this Memoir included a Botanical Garden and an
Institution for the Education of Scientific and Practical
Gardeners ; but it was not deemed expedient to com-
mence the last two branches, from an apprehension that
they might involve such an expense as would jeopar-
dize the success of the experimental garden and cem-
etery, which were considered of primary importance.
Judge Story, as chairman of the Garden and Ceme-
tery Committee, submitted at the annual meeting of
the Horticultural Society, held on Saturday, September
21, 1833, the first regular annual report from that
committee. From this report it appears that the whole
quantity of land in the garden and cemetery, including
the purchases during the year, was then one hundred
and ten acres. The number of cemetery lots then laid
out was about four hundred, of which two hundred and
fifty-nine lots of different dimensions were sold, which,
with the premiums paid for choice, amounted to the
sum of $17,229.72, most of which was then paid in.
The loan authorized by the Society amounted to $4,400,
and the total receipts to $21,694.72.
The committee paid out for the year ending Sep-
tember, 1833, for land, house for the gardener, fence,
gate, avenues, implements, tombs, and miscellaneous
expenses, $18,521.65. There was then due to Mr.
Cutter, David Stone, and to the hens of C. Stone, for
land, twenty-six hundred dollars. Besides the receiving
104 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
tomb at Mount Auburn, another had been purchased,
under Park Street Church in Boston, at an expense of
two hundred dollars. The number of interments in the
cemetery was forty.
Judge Story stated further, in his report, that, for
upwards of eighteen months, free access was given to
all who desired to visit the cemetery ; but that, certain
abuses arising, the committee adopted regulations deny-
ing admission to persons on horseback altogether, admit-
ting the proprietors of lots- in carriages, and opening
the gates freely to persons on foot, as before. These
regulations were generally acceptable. The report rep-
resented the situation and prospects of Mount Auburn
as highly flattering ; though the need of a small edifice
in which the religious services at funerals might be
performed was felt, and a hope was expressed that
such a building might be soon erected.
The eighth article of the Report of the Committee on
the Method of raising Subscriptions for the Experimen-
tal Garden and Cemetery provided for a garden and
cemetery committee, who should " direct all matters
appertaining to the regulation of the garden and ceme-
tery." This committee, at a meeting, on the 3d of
November, 1831, chose a secretary and a treasurer, the
latter officer being styled, in the reports of the commit-
tee, " treasurer of the cemetery," and recognized by a
vote of the Society, on the -4th of October, 1834, that
" all deeds relative to Mount Auburn shall be signed
by the treasurer of the cemetery committee in addi-
tion to the president " of the Society. The first report
of this officer accompanied the report of the Garden
and Cemetery Committee in 1833. The books of the
treasurer of the Society contain no record of the re-
SECOND ANNUAL REPORT. 105
ceipt or payment of any money whatever on account
of Mount Auburn during the time when it was owned
by the Horticultural Society. The committee reported
their doings at the annual meeting of the Society, on
one occasion asking authority to make a loan, and pur-
chase land, and, at another time, asking authority to
apply for amendments to the act of incorporation. With
these exceptions, the finances and general management
of the garden and cemetery seem to have been left
entirely to the committee. We have no information
that this course was in any degree the cause of the
separation of the Society from the cemetery, but believe
it is rather to be looked upon as an indication of that
diversity of interests which ultimately led to the sepa-
ration.
On Saturday, the 2Qth of September, 1834, the
second annual report of the Garden and Cemetery
Committee was presented to the Society by Judge
Story, the chairman. The committee congratulated the
Society upon the continued improvement of the garden
and cemetery, and the favor and encouragement which
they had received from the public. They felt it to be
their first duty, however, to correct an erroneous idea
entertained by a portion of the community, — that the
establishment was a private speculation for the benefit
of the members of the Society. This notion they pro-
nounced utterly unfounded, no individual having any
private interest in the establishment beyond what he
acquired as the proprietor of a lot in the cemetery,
which every man in the community might acquire upon
the same terms, the whole grounds being held in trust
by the Horticultural Society for the purposes of a gar-
den and cemetery.
106 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Judge Story, to show the success of the cemetery at
that time, used this language : —
" Mount Auburn has already become a place of general resort
and interest, as well to strangers as to citizens; and its shades
and paths, ornamented with monumental structures, of various
beauty and elegance, have already given solace and tranquillizing
reflections to man}' an afflicted heart, and awakened a deep moral
sensibility in many a pious bosom."
The committee expressed the hope, that, at a period
not far distant, the Society might be able to enclose the
grounds with a permanent wall; to erect a temple in
which the service over the dead might be performed by
clergymen of every denomination; to add extensively
to the beauty and productiveness of the garden, and.
above all, to lay the foundation of an accumulating
fund, the income of which . should be perpetually
devoted to the preservation, embellishment, and
improvement of the grounds. They also suggested
that arrangements for bringing water from Fresh Pond
into the ponds of the cemetery, to be afterwards
conducted into Charles River, would add to the
salubrity of the ponds, as well as improve the effect of
the scenery.
The whole expenditure at this time amounted to
upwards of twenty-five thousand dollars, and the
proceeds of sales of lots fell short of this amount
about two thousand dollars. The balance in the
hands of the treasurer was over five thousand dol-
lars ; and the committee were of the opinion that
reliance might safely be placed upon the future stiles
of lots to defray the expenses of the current year,
and that a portion of the funds on hand might be
applied to the reduction of the debts due for the
REGULATIONS FOR VISITORS. 107
new purchases of land. The whole number of lots
sold in the cemetery at that time was three hundred
and fifty-one ; of these, a hundred and seventy-five
lots were sold in 1832, seventy-six in 1833, and a
hundred in 1834. There were ninety-three inter-
ments the preceding year ; eighteen tombs were built ;
sixteen monuments were erected; and sixty-eight lots
were turfed, and otherwise ornamented.
The committee further stated, that finding the
grounds at Mount Auburn were visited by unusual
concourses of people on Sundays, and that the injuries
done to the grounds and shrubbery were far greater
on that day than on any other, they had made a regu-
lation prohibiting any persons, except proprietors and
then families, and the persons accompanying them,
from entering the grounds on Sundays, which had had
the effect to give quiet to the neighborhood, and prevent
the depredations complained of, as well as to enable
proprietors and then families to visit their lots in more
seclusion and tranquillity. They had also directed the
gates to be opened at sunrise, and closed at sunset.
At the annual festivals of the Horticultural Society
there were frequent allusions to Mount Auburn. One
of these festivals occurred three days before the
consecration of the grounds, when a regular toast was
offered as follows: "Eden — the first abode of the liv-
ing, Mount Auburn — the last resting place of the dead.
If the Tree of Life sprung from the soil of the one,
Immortality shall rise from the dust of the other." At
the festival on the 3d of October, 1832, the fourth
regular toast was presented in these words: "Mount
Auburn, — a fortunate conception happily bodied forth.
While it adds solemnity and dignity to the attributes
of death, it offers to grief its proper mitigations."
108 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
The orator at the fifth annual festival of the Society,
September 18, 1833, Hon. Alexander H. Everett, after
expressing the hope that the sacred domain of Mount
Vernon might be purchased by the people, and held as
national property through the intervention of the Gen-
eral Government, closed his address thus : —
" In the mean time you have commenced on the smaller scale,
corresponding with the wants and the resources of a single State,
an establishment of this description, which promises to become
one of the chief ornaments of the neighborhood, and of which the
progress thus far does great credit to the discernment and taste
of your Society. Superior in its natural advantages of position
to the famous sepulchral grounds of the ancient world, we may
venture to hope, unless the sons of the Pilgrims shall degenerate
from their fathers, that Mount Auburn will hereafter record in its
funeral inscriptions examples not less illustrious than theirs of
public and private virtue. Even now, while the enclosures that
surround it are scarcely erected, while the axe is still busy in dis-
posing the walks that are to traverse its interior, this consecrated
spot has received the remains of more than one whose memory a
grateful people will not willingly permit to die. There was laid,
by the gentle ministration of female friendship, as the first 1 tenant
of the place, the learned, devout, and simple-hearted daughter of
the Pilgrims, who has wrought out an honorable name for herself
by commemorating theirs. There reposes in peace the young
warrior, cut off like a fresh and blooming flower in the spring of
his career. There, too, rests beside them the generous stranger,
who, in his ardent zeal for the welfare of man, had come from a
distant continent to share the treasures of his wisdom with an
unknown people. 2 Around their remains will gradually be gath-
ered the best, the fairest, the bravest, of the present and of many
future generations. In a few short years, we too, gentlemen, who
are now employed in decorating the surface of Mount Auburn, or
describing its beauties, will sleep in its bosom. How deep the
1 Not the first, but one of the earliest.
2 The persona alluded to by Mr. Everett were Miss Hannah Adams,
Lieut. Watson, and Dr. Spurzheim.
DIFFERENCE OF INTEEESTS. 109
interest that attaches itself to such a spot ! How salutary the
effect which a visit to its calm and sacred shades will produce on
souls too much agitated by the storms of the world ! It was
surely fitting that art and nature should combine their beauties to
grace a scene devoted to purposes so high and holy."
Mr. Everett was but thirty-three years old when he
pronounced this beautiful address. How little he knew
what was before him! Instead of sleeping in the
bosom of Mount Auburn, " he lies buried on Dane's
Island, near Macao in China, under a monument erected
at the expense of the United States, he having died in
office as resident minister to China, on the 28th of
June, 1847, being the first person who had filled that
office from this country." 1
In 1834 it was perceived that the interests of the
proprietors of lots in the cemetery and those of the
other members of the Horticultural Society were too
unlike to be successfully united in one corporation.
The most important point on which a difference of opin-
ion and interest existed was the division of the pro-,
ceeds of sales of lots between the two branches of the
establishment, — the experimental garden and the ceme-
tery, and it was not always easy of adjustment. On the
question of legal and moral right it was found that the
Horticultural Society held the fee of the land, and that
to it was due whatever credit belonged to the inception
of the undertaking. On the other hand, it appeared
that the number of lot holders was rapidly increasing ;
that from the condition of purchase, that, upon paying
for his lot, every subscriber should be a member for life
of the Horticultural Society, they would soon have a con-
trolling vote in its affairs ; 2 that from them had been
1 Letter of the Hon. Edward Everett, dated March 8, 1862.
2 At the annual meeting of the Society September 21, 1833, a vote was
110 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
derived most of the funds of the establishment, and that
they naturally felt that the greater part should be devoted
to the improvement of the cemetery. The subject was
much discussed both in and out of the meetings of the
Society, considerable warmth of feeling being elicited
among the friends of the two departments ; and it
became evident that a peaceful arrangement was not
likely to be made, except by a sale of Mount Auburn,
by the Horticultural Society, to a new corporation, to
be composed of the holders of lots. Accordingly, at a
stated meeting of the Horticultural Society, on the 6th
of December, 1834, on motion of Marshall P. Wilder,
it was voted, " That a committee be appointed to
consider the expediency of disposing of the interests of
this Society in the garden and cemetery of Mount
Auburn to the proprietors of lots in the cemetery, and
to report the conditions on which a conveyance shall be
made, if the committee shall deem the measure advis-
able." It was further voted, " That said committee shall
consist of seven persons, four of whom shall not be
proprietors of lots hi the cemetery, and that Hon.
Joseph Story, M. P. Wilder, C. P. Curtis, Thomas
Hastings, E. Vose, J. A. Lowell, and E. Weston, jun.,
Esqs., be that committee." This committee held several
somewhat excited sessions without arriving at any agree-
m nt ; but finally, when an excited meeting at the office
of (harles P. Curtis, in Court Street, was near break-
. that, iu all future meetings of the Society, every proprietor of a cem-
1 t containing not loss than three hundred square feet, and. on the
■ of any proprietor, such representative of his or her lot as should lie
deal -mated by the Society, should be entitled to all the privileges of mem-
bership, and this provision was incorporated into a supplementary act of
the Legislature, for which a committee was at the same meeting authorized
to petition; thus making proprietors of lots in the cemetery not only life
but perpetual members of the Society. See Appendix D.
ARRANGEMENT OF 1835. Ill
ing up without any practical result, a compromise was
effected by the conciliatory efforts of Mr. Wilder, one
of the committee ; and the parties came to an agree-
ment, the most important point of which was, that the
proceeds of all sales should be divided annually between
the Horticultural Society and the new corporation, in
such manner, that, after deducting fourteen hundred
dollars for the expenses of the cemetery, one-fourth
part of the gross proceeds should be paid to the Horti-
cultural Society, and the remaining three-fourths should
be retained by the Mount Auburn Corporation for its
own use. The report of the committee to this effect
was made by Judge Story on the 2d of January, 1835,
and accepted by the Society ; and a committee, consist-
ing of Marshall P. Wilder, John A. Lowell, and S. F.
Coolidge, was appointed to carry it into effect.
Immediate application was made to the Legislature
for an act incorporating the proprietors of the cemetery,
which was passed March 31, 1835 ; * and a deed of con-
veyance, in which the conditions of the act were recited,
was afterwards made out from the Horticultural Society
to the newly incorporated proprietors. The vote of the
Society to execute the deed was passed June 6, 1835,
and the deed was dated June 19, 1835.
The result of this arrangement has been highly au-
spicious to both parties, which, since it was made, have
been separately engaged, each in its own field of use-
fulness. The receipts from Mount Auburn, added to its
other sources of income, have given the Horticultural
Society stability and vigor, and enabled it to accomplish
a work beyond that of any similar society in this coun-
try ; while the Proprietors of Mount Auburn have been
1 For Section X of this Act see Appendix E.
112 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
enabled to expend more than six hundred thousand dol-
lars in the preservation, improvement, embellishment,
and enlargement of their cemetery.
Whatever of ill feeling had grown up between the
proprietors of lots in Mount Auburn and the other
members of the Horticultural Society was of short
duration. At the meeting of the Society on the 17th
of July, 1835, President Vose stated that one object of
the meeting was to consider the expediency of inviting
those gentlemen who had ceased to be members by the
recent act of separation of the Mount Auburn Ceme-
tery from the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, to
become subscription members of the Society. A com-
mittee was appointed to invite these gentlemen to
become members of the Society; and on the 27th of
September, Judge Story, who had been chairman of the
Garden and Cemetery Committee from the beginning,
and was chosen president of the Proprietors of Mount
Auburn, and who, probably, shared as largely in the
excitement attending the separation as any one, was
chosen a life member of the Society. At the same time
Benjamin A. Gould, who had been a member of the
Garden and Cemetery Committee from the beginning,
was chosen a subscription member. A further proof
of the good will of the Society toward the new corpo-
ration was shown in a motion to dispose the books in
the library relating to cemeteries in such manner that
thoy might be consulted by members of the Mount
Auburn Corporation.
For many years no occasion existed for new adjust-
ments of the relations between the two corporations ;
but gradually differences arose, which it was thought
important to settle while some, at least, of the founders
ADJUSTMENT OF 1858. 113
of Mount Auburn, who had been fully acquainted with
the whole subject from the beginning, were living to
assist in an amicable arrangement. The most impor-
tant of these differences arose from the claim of the
Horticultural Society to participate in the proceeds of
sales of land purchased since the separation of the two
interests. Another difference was in regard to the
receipts for single interments, of which, also, a propor-
tion was claimed by the Horticultural Society.
The first step towards adjusting these differences was
a communication from Dr. Bigelow, then president of
the Proprietors of Mount Auburn, to the Horticultural
Society, requesting a conference with a committee from
the Society. This communication was received at a
meeting of the Society on the 7th of August, 1858,
and, in compliance with Dr. Bigelow's request, it was
voted that a committee of five should be appointed by
the Chair, and that the president, Josiah Stickney,
should be chairman of the committee, to confer with
the Trustees of Mount Auburn. The president ap-
pointed Marshall P. Wilder, Samuel Walker, Edward
S. Rand, and Charles M. Hovey. The treasurer,
William R. Austin, was added to the committee. The
committee on the part of Mount Auburn consisted of
the president, Dr. Bigelow, with Benjamin A. Gould
and James Cheever. These committees met in confer-
ence ; and, after a full statement and discussion of all
matters of difference, a sub-committee was appointed,
consisting of Dr. Bigelow and Mr. Gould on the part
of the Proprietors of Mount Auburn, and of Messrs.
Wilder and Rand on the part of the Society, to con-
sider on what terms and in what manner all such mat-
ters could be adjusted. This sub-committee, after
114 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
several meetings, and a very full and careful considera-
tion of the whole subject, reported to the committee
of conference a plan for the settlement of all questions
and controversies, which was unanimously adopted by
the full committee, and by them reported to the Society
on the 4th of December. This report was accepted,
and Messrs. Rand and Wilder were appointed to carry
the same into effect. This was done by an indenture
between the two parties, which was read at a meeting
of the Horticultural Society on the 18th of December,
and, having been approved by the Society, was executed
on the same day, and two days later was accepted and
adopted by the Trustees of Mount Auburn.
Some difficulties having arisen in regard to the
construction of the provisions of the fifth article of this
indenture, and the carrying into effect, it was deemed
for the interest of the parties concerned that some ex-
planation of it should be made. This was done by a
supplementary indenture dated January 1, 1869. 1
Since these adjustments, the course of the two corpo-
rations has flowed on smoothly, with little to call for
notice here ; but there are two transactions mentioned
in the records of the Society which should not be
omitted. After the completion of the second Horti-
cultural Hall, application was made on the 3d of Febru-
ary, 1866, by Dr. Bigclow, in behalf of the Trustees of
Mount Auburn, for the use of a room or hall in the
building, wherein to hold the annual meeting of the
corporation. The Society voted, that our relations with
Dr. Bigelow and the Trustees of Mount Auburn being
of the most friendly character, and desiring to continue
and cultivate this friendly intercourse and mutual regard,
1 For these indentures see Appendix F.
LETTER OF DR. BIGELOW. 115
their pecuniary prosperity being our prosperity, the free
use of the Library Room or either Hall be with pleas-
ure tendered for the purpose stated. This courtesy has
ever since been shown to the Proprietors of Mount
Auburn, and thus the child has once a year come under
the parental roof.
In September of the same year, Dr. Bigelow, feeling
that the benefit which he had conferred on the Society,
through his services to Mount Auburn, had not received
due acknowledgment, addressed to the Society the fol-
lowing letter, which it is but justice to " the only indi-
vidual without whom Mount Auburn would never have
existed " to include here, with the action of the Society
upon it.
To the President and Officers of the Massachusetts Horti-
cultural Society.
Gentlemen, — I have had the honor to be one of the earliest
members and promoters of the Horticultural Societ}-, and a mem-
ber of its first board of officers. I was the originator of the first
plan for a rural cemetery in this country, and had prepared and
submitted to various persons and meetings, previous to the incor-
poration of this Society, the plan for a landscape garden containing
private lots for family interments ; being precisely what Mount
Auburn now is.
After several years of inquiry for a suitable place, I succeeded
in obtaining from Mr. Brimmer, for the desired purpose, the refusal
of the land which has since constituted Mount Auburn, for the
price of six thousand dollars. This overture I submitted to
the officers of the Horticultural Societ}* soon after its incorpora-
tion, and urged upon their notice the expediency of uniting an
ornamental cemeteiy with their other objects, thus combining a
public good with prospective pecuniary advantage to the new
Society, which was then without funds, and had proposed no
other objects than such as were strictly horticultural. My pro-
posal was accepted by them ; and the results at Mount Auburn
and in Boston are visible at the present day.
116 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
For thirty-six years I have officially devoted to the care and
improvement of Mount Auburn Cemetery most of the leisure time
which I had to spare from professional labors, and have gratui-
tously watched over its interests as over those of my own child.
The chief responsibility in its early and difficult stages was
thrown upon me. The designs as well as contracts of all the
public structures, such as the gate, the iron fence, the chapel, and
the tower, it is well known were made and furnished by me. The
selection of the subjects and the artists of the historical statues in
the chapel was, by vote of the Trustees, referred to me alone, as
well as the duty of importing and placing them in their present site.
In questions of seemingby opposite interest, which have some-
times arisen between the Horticultural Society and the Proprietors
of Mount Auburn, I have invariably used my humble influence
to prevent litigation, and to promote friendly co-operation between
parties whose true interests were obviousby identical, and of whose
eventual harmony the fruits are now sufficiently apparent.
Conscious that I am the only individual without whom Mount
Auburn would never have existed, nor the funds realized with
which Horticultural Hall has been built, I have taken the liberty
to call the attention of the Societ}' to the fact, that in all the late
publications, discourses, and records of the Society, all notice
of niy name has been avoided, and the credit given to other
parties, whom I now gratefulby recall as friendly and efficient
collaborators, but into whose minds the enterprise of Mount
Auburn Cemetery, the first of its kind in our country, was, by their
own testimony, first and solely introduced by me.
I have the honor to be with great respect, }-ours,
Jacob Bigelow.
Boston, September 20, 1866.
This letter was communicated to the Society at the
annual meeting, October 6, when, after remarks by
Marshall P. Wilder, commending the services of Dr.
Bigelow, it was voted, on motion of Mr. Wilder, that a
committee of three, of which the president should be
chairman, be appointed to take into consideration the
letter of Dr. Bigelow, and the recognition of his labors
in connection with the Society and Mount Auburn
ACTION ON DE. BIGELOW'S LETTER. 117
Cemetery. This committee, consisting of President
Hovey, Marshall P. Wilder, and Charles O. Whitmore,
made the following report on the 29th of December,
which was accepted by the Society : —
Wliereas, the Ceineteiy of Mount Auburn, founded by the
Massachusetts Horticultural Societ}', has proved to be an enter-
prise eminently advantageous to the welfare of the Society, of the
highest sanitary importance to the public, a source of grateful
consolation to the living, and a sacred resting place for the dead,
showing that landscape art may be most appropriately devoted
to the embellishment of rural cemeteries.
And whereas, our esteemed associate, Dr. Jacob Bigelow, one
of our first officers, and now president of the Proprietors of Mount
Auburn, was one of the first to open the question of Rural Ceme-
teries, and the first who suggested to the Society the expediency
and propriety of combining a cemetery with an experimental
garden, and, by his aid and counsel, was instrumental in the
formation of Mount Auburn Cemeter}', to which he has for thirt}'-
six years devoted his services gratuitously in the improvement
and embellishment of the grounds ;
And whereas, "in questions of seemingly opposite interest
which have arisen (in the past) between this Society and the
Proprietors of Mount Auburn," Dr. Bigelow has, by his wise
counsel and sagacious acts, contributed largely to the settlement
of all points that prevented harmonious action between the two
Societies :
Resolved, That the Massachusetts Horticultural Society hereby
acknowledges that its thanks are due to its early associate, Dr.
Jacob Bigelow, for his eminent and persevering services in the
establishment of Mount Auburn Cemeteiy, whereby he merits the
gratitude of the whole community, as well as for his aid and coun-
sel to this Society.
Resol:ed, That this report and Dr. Bigelow's letter be entered
' upon the Records, and a copy of this report and resolutions be
furnished by the recording secretar}^ to Dr. Bigelow.
Respectfully submitted.
C. M. HOVEY,
MARSHALL P. WILDER, \ Committee.
C. O. WHITMORE,
118 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
The portion of the history of the Horticultural So-
ciety thus reviewed is both interesting and important.
For several years, the history of Mount Auburn was
embraced in that of the Society, and, even though sepa-
rated, they can never be wholly divorced. The Society
must always be interested in the cemetery as a child of
its own, and one that has for years added to the pros-
perity of the parent. Mount Auburn, while it makes a
liberal return for the care bestowed upon it in its youth,
rejoices that a share of its annual income fosters one of
the noblest of arts and sciences, and that, while it " scat-
tereth, it yet increaseth." If the Society had done
nothing more than to establish the oldest and one of
the most important of the rural cemeteries of the United
States, it would have accomplished no mean work in its
existence of half a century.
CHAPTER IV.
THE FINANCES OF THE SOCIETY.
We have seen that at the time of the organization
of the Society, in 1829, there was some preparation in
the public mind to welcome such an institution. But,
though individual horticulturists and amateurs in rural
pursuits had been for some time awake to the impor-
tance of such an association, this feeling was not general
in the community. The proposal for the new society
met not only with indifference from many persons, but
on the part of some, who deemed existing organizations
adequate to cover the whole field of agriculture and
horticulture, with positive jealousy and opposition.
But the love of the founders of the Society for horti-
culture, their belief that the best means of its improve-
ment and advancement would be by the organization
of a society devoted to that especial purpose, and their
faith that an intelligent and wealthy community would
supply the means for carrying out its objects, were suffi-
cient to induce them to unite in the establishment of
such a society, in spite of lukewarmness or opposition.
Their views in regard to the financial management most
likely to lead to success may be learned from the fol-
lowing statement, which forms the beginning of the re-
port of the committee appointed to inquire into the
expediency of establishing an experimental garden and
119
120 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
rural cemetery, presented to the Society June' 18,
1831: —
" When the Massachusetts Horticultural Society was organized,
it was confidently anticipated, that, at uo very distant period, a
garden of experiment would lie established in the vicinity of
Boston : but, to arrive at such a pleasing result, it was deemed ex-
pedient that our efforts should first be directed to the accomplish-
ment of objects which would not require very extensive pecuniary
resources ; that we should proceed with great caution, and, by a
prudential management of our means, gradually develop a more
complete and efficient s}*stem for rendering the institution as
extensively useful as it was necessaiy and important. Public favor
was to be propitiated by the adoption of such incipient measures
a> were best calculated to encourage patronage, and insure ulti-
mate success."
Though the Society had then been in existence, and
conducted in accordance with these views, but little more
than two years, the committee were enabled to add, that
" the kind disposition which had been generally evinced
to advance its interests had had a salutary and cheering
influence." Yet at that time the only resources of the
Society, excepting a single donation of a hundred dol-
lars, were derived from admission fees and assessments,
the former being five dollars, and the latter two dollars
a year ; or any member might compound for his future
assessments by the payment of thirty dollars. By the
by-laws adopted in 1836 the fee for life membership
was reduced to twenty dollars ; but hi 1866 it was again
raised to thirty dollars, and at the same time the admis-
sion fee for annual members was increased to ten dol-
lars. The annual assessment is limited by the Act of
Incorporation to two dollars.
The revenue derived from this source has fluctuat-
ed greatly. During the connection of Mount Auburn
GROWTH OF MEMBERSHIP. 121
Cemetery with the Society, it was much reduced by the
admission to membership, free of all assessments, of
purchasers of lots in the cemetery. The same effect
was produced by the late civil war ; the sum received
in 1862 being but little more than half that received in
1860. On the contrary, the completion of the halls
erected by the Society in 1845 and 1865 was followed
by a large accession of members ; the receipts from this
source rising from $460 in 1843 to $1,356 in 1847,
after which they gradually declined for several years.
In 1866, the year after the completion of the present
hall, they were $2,575.93, the largest sum ever received.
The total amount received from this source to the close
of the year 1878, is about $49,000.
In this connection some notice of the growth of the
membership of the Society will be appropriate. At the
time of the first anniversary, in 1829, the list of members
comprised 249 names. The admission of the purchasers
of lots in Mount Auburn to membership raised the
number to 657 in 1834; but, after the separation of the
two interests in 1835, it fell to 350, and continued to
decline until 1838, when only 246 names were borne
upon the roll. On the completion of the hall in School
Street it rose to 438 in 1846, and continued, though not
without fluctuation, to increase gradually, until it reached
590 in 1863. In 1864 it rose suddenly to 705, and in
1865, the year of the dedication of the present hall, to
905, this being the largest increase in any one year.
After that time it increased gradually, until in 1871 it
reached 1,035, the highest number ever attained. It
continued near that point until 1876, when, owing to
the financial pressure, it began to decrease, and at the
end of the year 1878 it was 900. A gratifying feature
122 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
of this growth is the constant greater increase of life
members, the roll for 1837 showing 36 life and 306
annual members, while in 1878 there were 577 life and
323 annual members.
How far the founders of the Society anticipated that
it would be endowed by wealthy and generous men with
gifts of money and legacies cannot now be told, though
doubtless their hopes, if not their expectations, looked
forward to such endowments ; nor were their hopes dis-
appointed. The first of these donations, which has al-
ready been alluded to, was from the Hon. John Welles,
on the 13th of June, 1829, only a few months after the
organization of the Society. This donation of a hundred
dollars was intended to promote the improvement of
the apple, and was offered in premiums for the fruit
of seedling trees which should be brought into notice
after the year 1829.
In 1835 a donation of $1,000 was received from Am-
brose S. Courtis, a merchant of Boston. Mr. Courtis,
who died on the 27th of August, 1836, bequeathed to
the Society the further sum of $10,000 ; but, the will
being contested by the heirs at law, a compromise was
made, by which the Society received, in 1839, one half
the amount intended by the testator, whose benefac-
tions were among the largest ever made to the Society,
and coining in its infancy, when its funds were limited,
may be considered the most important of all.
In 1839, also, Thomas Lee of Roxbury, a lover and
cultivator of our native flowering plants, offered *150
to encourage their growth, to be awarded in premiums
during that and the succeeding four years. This gift
was on the condition that the Society should offer an
equal amount; and, on the same condition. Mr. Lee,
GIFTS FROM HON. SAMUEL APPLETON. 123
the next year, offered a premium of $10 for the most
successful method of destroying the rose slug. To this
John P. Gushing afterwards added $50 on the same
condition as Mr. Lee's gift, making a total premium of
$120.
The next gift was from the Hon. Samuel Appleton,
who, in a letter to Marshall P. Wilder, president of the
Society, September 15, 1815, said, " With the view of
giving further aid to the Society in then very laudable
exertions, I send you enclosed $1,000, to be invested as
a permanent fund, the interest accruing therefrom to
be appropriated annually in premiums for improvements
in the arts to which the Society is devoted, in such
manner as it shall direct, for producing trees good for
food, and flowers pleasant to the sight."
At the Third Triennial Festival of the Society, on the
22d of September, 1818, a letter was read from Mr.
Appleton, in which, with his regrets that indisposition
prevented him from attending the festival, and his
wishes for the continued success of the Society, he
sent $200, " fifty dollars of this sum, more or less, to
be invested in a Bible, elegantly bound hi one, two, or
three volumes, the remainder to be laid out in books
of a religious, moral, scientific, or horticultural char-
acter, as the Committee on the Library should think
most beneficial to the Society ; the Bible, the best of
all books, giving a graphic history of the first garden,
of its fruits and flowers, its location, number of inhab-
itants, then* character, and expulsion from Eden for
disobeying the command given for their observance."
The year 1846 brought to the treasury of the Society
three liberal donations. On the 7th of February, the
president stated that an eminent individual, who wished
124 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
his name withheld, had given to the Society $300 to be
disposed of in premiums. This amount was appropri-
ated in twenty special prizes for fruit, of $5 each, one
third of the whole being awarded in each of the years
1846, 1847, and 1848. The time which has elapsed
since this gift was made allows the statement that the
donor was John P. Cushing of Watertown (now Bel-
mont), a lover and munificent patron of horticulture.
On the 27th of February, John A. Lowell addressed
to the Society a note, in which he expressed his regret,
that, from his avocations, he could not actively co-ope-
rate with it in its successful exertions, which he had
observed with much interest, to perfect the culture of
flowers and fruit, and to diffuse through our State a
knowledge of useful and ornamental gardening. Desir-
ing, however, to promote its object, he sent $ 1,000,
which he wished to have invested, and the income to be
applied as the Society might determine. The Society
voted that the interest of this fund should be awarded
in medals, to be called the " Lowell Medals."
On the 26th of August, the Hon. Theodore Lyman
sent $1,000, which he wished to have "invested in a
permanent manner, and the proceeds of the investment
to be appropriated in the shape of prizes for the
encouragement of the growth of such kind or kinds
of fruit as the government of the Society might deem
advisable." At his decease, which occurred on the 18th
of July, 1849, Mr. Lyman left to the Society $10,000,
the largest gift it has ever received. To commemorate
these gifts a marble bust of Mr. Lyman, by Dexter, was
procured by the Society, and placed in the hall.
April 3, 1847, a communication was received from
Josiah Bradlee of Boston, accompanied with his check
LEGACIES OF HON. B. V. FRENCH. 125
for $500, for the purpose of being added to the per-
manent fund for premiums on fruits and flowers. In
the next year, on the 23d of September, Mr. Bradlee
sent to the Society another gift of the same amount,
which it was voted to add to his former donation, to
be invested in the same manner and for the same pur-
pose.
At a meeting of the Society on the 7th of August,
1847, a letter was read from Edward Beck of Worton
Cottage, Isleworth, near London, Eng., a corresponding
member of the Society, and a successful amateur culti-
vator of the pelargonium. As he did not wish to be
merely a nominal corresponding member of the Society,
he placed at the disposal of the Committee on Flowers
£7, to form two prizes for the season of 1848, to en-
courage the cultivation of his favorite flower.
At the meeting of the Society, January 18, 1851,
$150 was received as a donation from George W.
Smith, to be appropriated to the purchase of books for
the library.
The Hon. Benjamin V. French, who was one of the
founders of the Society, and long an officer, retained
the deep interest which he always felt in its prosperity
as long as he lived; and at his death, which occurred on
the 10th of April, 1860, he left to it $500. It was
voted by the Society, in consideration of the deep
interest manifested by Mr. French in the cultivation of
the apple, to invest the amount as a special fund, the
income to be forever appropriated in prizes for the
improvement of that fruit. A further sum of $2,511.13
was received from the estate of Mr. French on the
decease of his widow in 1878.
At the meeting of the Society June 6, 1863, the
126 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
president, Charles M. Hovey, read a letter from II. II.
llunncwell, enclosing a mortgage bond of the Illinois
Central Railroad Company, bearing interest at seven
per cent per annum, for $500, the income of which
Mr. Ilunnewcll desired to be applied in premiums and
gratuities for the introduction and cultivation of new
evergreen trees and shrubs, and particularly new va-
rieties of hardy rhododendrons. The thanks of the
Society were tendered to Mr. Hunnewell for this token
of his interest in its welfare and usefulness, and it was
voted that the gift should be called the " Hunnewell
Fund."
The next donation was from the same gentleman,
but little more than a year later, and of much larger
amount. It was announced at the meeting of the 2d
of July, 1864, and consisted of two United States bonds
of $1,000 each. In his letter accompanying it Air.
Hunnewell requested, —
"That it should be kept entirely distinct from all other funds
of the Society, for the specific purpose here designated ; viz.. that
the income shall be allowed to accumulate for periods of two, three,
or more years, and distributed from time to time, after sufficient
notice, under such regulations as may be deemed expedient, b} T a
committee appointed for that purpose, in one or more prizes, to the
owners of estates of not less than three acres in extent, who shall
lay out and plant them with the most rare and desirable orna-
mental trees and shrubs, in the most tasteful and effective manner,
developing the capabilities of the locations in the highest degree,
and presenting the most successful examples of science, skill, and
taste, as applied to the embellishment of a country residence ; the
trees to be under the most thorough cultivation, the grounds in
high keeping, and the prizes to apply equalby in cases where pro-
prietors take professional advice, as well as when acting on their
own judgment in their improvements."
Again, on the 31st of August, 1866, the same liberal
GIFTS FROM H. H. HUNNEWELL. 127
patron of horticulture, in the hope of encouraging the
cultivation of the rose in our community, and of increas-
ing the attractions of the Society's exhibitions, asked
its acceptance of a donation of .$260, to be awarded
in prizes ; the careful specification of which showed not
only a love of flowers, but a practical familiarity with
them.
The Rhododendron Show on Boston Common, in June,
1873, was one of the most noticeable events in the
history of the Society. This beautiful exhibition we
owe to Mr. Hunnewell, who conceived the plan, and,
with the assistance of a few friends, provided the plants,
making the show in the name of the Society, and guar-
anteeing it against any loss, but giving it the benefit
of any profit after payment of the expenses. The
exhibition resulted in a profit of $1,565.28, of which
$1,440 was invested by Mr. Hunnewell in two bonds of
the Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy Railroad, of the
par value of $1,500, the income of this fund to be
distributed in prizes for the encouragement of the culti-
vation of rhododendrons and hardy azaleas, thus making
three permanent funds, amounting in all to $4,000,
established by this zealous and liberal friend of the
Society, besides his donation for prizes for roses, of
which the principal was intended to be awarded. The
balance of $125.28 from the Rhododendron Show was
added to the general fund of the Society.
At the meeting of the Society on the 5th of Novem-
ber, 1864, the treasurer, William R. Austin, announced
a donation from William Thomas, of $100, for the fund
of the Society, for which the thanks of the Society were
presented to him.
On the 3d of December, 1864, Josiah Stickney pre-
128 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
sented, in behalf of Dr. "William J. Walker of Newport,
R.I., a certificate of ninety-seven shares of unpreferred
stock in the Connecticut and Passumpsic Railroad, " for
promoting the objects of the Society, and for encoura-
ging the introduction and cultivation of superior vege-
tables." The value of this donation to the Society was
$2,354.43.
The next donation was announced on the 6th of Feb-
ruary, 1869, when a letter from Ex-President Josiah
Stickney was read, in which he signified his intention to
give the use of $12,000 for the benefit of the Library.
The terms of this gift were stated in an Indenture
dated February 5, 1869. They were, that the Society
should hold the fund for thirty years from the first day
of February, 1869, and should every year during that
time appropriate from the income seven hundred dol-
lars, to be expended solely under the direction of the
Library Committee, in the purchase of books on botany,
horticulture, landscape gardening, architecture in its
connection with horticulture, and on other kindred sub-
jects, such books to be designated as the " Stickney
Library." Xo part of the income may be used for the
purchase of newspapers, pamphlets, or periodicals, or
for the binding of books, or the alteration or repair of
the library rooms, or for the salary of the librarian or
any other officer or employe of the Society, or for the
care or preservation of the Library. Whenever the
mortgage on the estate of the Society shall be dis-
charged, the sum is to be invested in such securities as
shall be approved by Mr. Stickncy's executors and
trustees, as a separate fund, to be known as the " Stick-
ney Library Fund." At the expiration of thirty years
from the 1st of February, 1869, the principal is to be
paid to the president and fellows of Harvard College.
DONATIONS FOR PRIZES. 129
Levi Wkitcomb, a member of the Society, who died
in 1866, evinced his attachment to it by a bequest of
$500, to be available to the Society on the decease
of his wife, which occurred in 1870. On the 5th of
November of that year it was voted that the income
from this bequest should be known as the " Whitcomb
Premium," and that from it should be offered a prize
of $200 for the best seedling potato which should
be originated after January 1, 1871, and be exhibited
before and tested by a committee of the Society for at
least five years, and adjudged by the committee to be
of superior quality ; the first premium not to be awarded
prior to the year 1878.
In each of the years 1872 and 1873 Charles S. Sar-
gent offered prizes to the amount of $160 for Chinese
azaleas and roses. In 1875 and 1876 William Gray,
Jr., offered prizes to the amount of $100 in each year
for pelargoniums, and in 1876 he offered prizes amount-
ing to $80 for Hybrid Perpetual roses, and the same in
1877. Other gentlemen have at different times given
less amounts to be offered as prizes for the objects in
which they felt a particular interest, among whom were
President Charles M. Hovey, Charles O. Whitmore,
Elijah Williams, Peter Smith, and the Fruit Committee
of 1867. The whole amount of the various donations
mentioned, including the Stickney Fund, in which the
Society has only a temporary interest, is a little more
than $42,500.
The financial prosperity of the Horticultural Society
has resulted, in a great degree, from the foundation, in
its early years, of Mount Auburn Cemetery, of which a
full account has been given in previous chapters. By
the terms of separation between the Society and the
130 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Proprietors of Mount Auburn, it was agreed that the
latter should annually pay to the former one fourth part
of the proceeds of sales of lots, after deducting $1,400
for expenses. The amount received by the Society
under this arrangement has averaged about $3,700
annually.
The largest item in the income of the Society is from
the rent of the stores under its halls, and of the halls
themselves when not needed for horticultural exhibi-
tions. It w T as not, however, until the erection of the
present hall that this item became so important ; the
largest rent ever received from the School Street prop-
erty, including the estate owned by the Society in the
rear of the hall, having been $2,947.50 in 1858. The
total amount received by the Society on account of rent
of stores and halls is about $307,000.
The Society would never have attained its present
financial position, had not its affairs from its organiza-
tion been economically administered, and its surplus
funds carefully invested ; the first investment having
been made January 16, 1835. At the meeting on the
7th of October, 1837, it was " Voted, That the Commit-
tee of Finance be directed, whenever there be $200 on
hand, and not wanted for immediate use, to have the
same invested in such permanent stocks as they may
think best." Although the letter of this vote may not
always have been followed, the general policy indicated
has been steadily pursued, the stocks having been ulti-
mately sold to provide funds for the erection of the
Society's halls. The income received by the Society in
the form of dividends and interest has reached the total
amount of $10,000 ; and so well have the investments
been chosen, that no loss has been sustained on any of
AMOUNT PAID IN PRIZES. 131
them, with the exception of the first investment, which
was of comparatively small amount. Nor is it known
that a single dollar has ever been lost through the
unfaithfulness of any of its servants.
The expenditures of the Society have been much
more varied in then- nature than its income, and are
consequently more difficult to describe ; but the largest
annual item of expense has been the premiums and
gratuities paid for the exhibition of superior horticul-
tural productions, and, beginning in 1850, for the best
planned and cultivated gardens, greenhouses, and orna-
mental grounds. The sums annually offered hi the
infancy of the Society were, of course, small, the first
premium list, published in May, 1829, amounting to
$153 ; but they gradually increased to $6,800, offered
in 1876. This increase has, with few exceptions,
been steady, though in 181:5, the first year of the
occupation of the hall in School Street, the amount rose
to $1,200 against $460 in 1844. "When the annual
exhibitions became so. extensive as to be held under a
tent, the amount of prizes was necessarily increased,
after which it rose gradually until the civil war, when it
declined ; but, with the opening of the new hall, it rose
higher than ever before, and steadily increased until
1876. Since that year it has necessarily been dimin-
ished. The whole amount actually paid in prizes and
gratuities (not that offered) since the foundation of the
Society, including those for 1878, is about $103,000.
In addition to the prizes and gratuities for horticultural
productions, it has been the custom of the Society to
give a piece of plate to a retiring president, and some-
times to other officers the same, or a gratuity in money,
as a token of personal regard, and a slight reward for
132 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
valuable services rendered to the Society and to the
cause of horticulture; which in the aggregate have
amounted to a considerable sum.
Apart from the large payments for prizes and gratui-
ties, the exhibitions held by the Society have, on the
whole, not been a source of profit, but the reverse. In
the early days of the Society, when the labor of arran-
ging and decorating for the annual exhibition could
be performed by the members of the Committee of Ar-
rangements, with the assistance of the porter in charge
of the hall, a profit could be counted on, which formed
an important item in the revenue of the Society ; but,
since the exhibitions have grown more extensive, the
expenses have frequently exceeded the receipts, the
greatest deficit having been in 1857, when the former
were $2,382.68, and the latter $1,372.50, leaving a
deficiency of $1,010.18. The largest excess of receipts
over expenses was in 1865, at the first annual exhibition
in the present hall, the receipts having been $1,822,
and the expenses $1,371.76, leaving a profit of $450.21.
The expenses of the annual and semi-annual exhibitions
have in the aggregate exceeded the receipts by more
than $8,000.
Until the opening of the hall in School Street, admis-
sion to the weekly exhibitions was always free ; but at
that time a small admission fee was required, the
receipts from this source amounting during the season
527.13. The same course was continued, but with
greatly diminished receipts, for several years afterwards,
and occasionally since. The whole amount received at
the weekly exhibitions was probably about $1,500, — a
very small part of the cost at which they have been
sustained. Doubtless a very different result would
KOOMS AND LIBRARY. 133
have been reached, had this subject been looked at
solely from a pecuniary point of view ; but the Society
has justly considered that the object of these exhibitions
is not to replenish its treasury, but to improve the art
of horticulture, and to educate the public taste in this
direction; and with this end in view they have been
conducted.
The holding of horticultural exhibitions involves the
necessity of a place to hold them in ; and those occupied
by the Society have cost in the aggregate a large sum.
As appears from the treasurer's books, the rent of those
first occupied was but the modest sum of $25 per
quarter, but as the Society grew this expense necessarily
grew also, and has amounted in all to more than
$15,000. This sum includes only the rent of rooms
continuously occupied, and not that paid for halls and
tents hired for the annual exhibitions, which is included
in the expenses of those exhibitions. To the rent may
be added the interest paid by the Society, amounting,
December 31, 1878, to $81,000, by far the greater part
of this sum being interest on the mortgage debt incurred
by the Society in the erection of its halls.
The formation and maintenance of a horticultural
library, to correspond with the character of the Society
in other respects, was one of the first subjects which
engaged the attention of the founders of the Society,
and has every year been a source of greater or less
expense. It is true that, particularly in its earlier
years, many valuable books have been presented to the
Society ; but the greater part of those which the library
now contains have been purchased, and many of tlr
large illustrated works at a very considerable expense.
Of a total expenditure during the first two years of
134 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
the existence of the Society of $2,353.47, very nearly
one-third ($765.42) is believed to have been on account
of the library. The usual appropriation for this pur-
pose was $150 annually, until 1859, when $400 was
appropriated, and this was afterwards increased to
$500, at which amount it remained until the establish-
ment of the Stickney Fund, since which time the Society
has appropriated, in addition to the annual income of
$700 from that fund, from $200 to $300 for periodicals
and binding. In the valuation of the Society's prop-
erty December, 1878, the library is estimated at $18,-
067.45, which is probably less than its actual cost to
the Society, and doubtless much less than the same books
could now be purchased for, or than its intrinsic value
for consultation or reading.
The dissemination of horticultural knowledge through
the publications of the Society has caused the expendi-
ture of a considerable portion of its income. From
1847 to 1851 the Transactions were published in royal
octavo, with colored plates of fruits and flowers, and
copies were sold to the amount of several hundred dol-
lars ; but, with this exception, all the publications of
the Society have been distributed gratuitously to the
members. The whole cost of this department of the
Society's work, including catalogues of the library, is
estimated at about $21,500 after deducting the amount
received for publications sold.
In the earliest years of the Society a porter, who re-
ceived a small sum annually for the care of the hall, was
its only paid servant ; but as the library became more
important, and the business of the Society increased,
nominal salaries were paid to the librarian, treasurer,
and secretary, that of the treasurer being afterwards in-
RECEIPTS AND EXPENSES.
135
creased as the funds of the Society accumulated. Small
salaries were also paid to the chairmen of the com-
mittees on fruits, flowers, and vegetables, as then duties
grew with the growth of the exhibitions. Still later,
when the care and letting of the stores and halls, and
the other business of the Society, became sufficient to
occupy all the time of the treasurer, it was necessary
to further increase his salary ; and in 1874 a paid edit-
or of the Society's transactions was appointed ; this
office being in 1876 merged in that of secretary. Other
expenditures have been the furniture and decorations of
the halls (including the portraits of all the presidents),
repairs, insurance, taxes (this item alone amounting in
the fourteen years ending with 1878 to $48,060.05),
labor, and miscellaneous expenses.
The receipts of the Society from its formation to the
annual meeting, September 19, 1829, to which time
the accounts of the treasurer were made up, were $845,
being wholly from admission fees and assessments, with
the exception of Mr. Welles's donation, already men-
tioned, of $100 ; and the expenses were $717.30.
n 1830 the receipt
s were . .
. $736.50
expenses, $913.18
1840
a
i<
. 2,362.62
1,924.53
1850
a
a
. 7,003.01
" 6,593.04
1860
a
a
. 14,000.45
" 11,768.23
1870
((
it
. 29,947.15
" 22,698.30
1876
k
((
. 19,895.13
« 31,081.8s 1
These statements, which include only the ordinary re-
ceipts and expenditures of the Society, will give some
idea of its financial progress.
# The cost of the first hall, erected by the Society in
1 The expenses this year were larger than before or since,
over receipts was met by a temporary loan.
The excess
136 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
School Street, at the time of occupancy, May 15, 1845,
was. according to the report of the Building Committee,
for the land SIS, 189.75, for the building $19,493.03 ;
making a total of $37,682.78. The means for its erec-
tion were derived from the sale of stocks in which the
surplus funds of the Society had been invested ; from
the Society's proportion of the proceeds of sales of lots
in Mount Auburn, and from a loan, secured by mortgage.
of $ 15,000, at five per cent per annum. In 1849 this
loan was repaid, and a new one of $10,000, at six per
cent, obtained from Josiah Bradlee. In September,
1852, the Society bought of Isaac B. Woodbury the
estate in the rear of the hall, containing about 2.400
square feet, for $12,000, with the intention of at some
future time enlarging the hall, which had become too
small for the annual exhibitions. The payment was
made in cash $2,500, and a mortgage of $9,500, on
which $5,000 was paid February 14, 1854, and the
balance of $4,500 in March, 1855. May 12, 1856,
$5,000 was paid on the mortgage to Mr. Bradlee, redu-
cing it one half; in January, 1857, $2,000 more was
paid ; and January 6, 1858, the balance of principal
and interest, amounting to $3,027.50.
The Society was then free from debt, and a resolu-
tion of thanks to Mr. Bradlee was passed for his loan,
which he had renewed and continued from time to
time, receiving payment as suited the convenience of
the Society ; thus saving it from the payment of extra
interest during a long period of money pressure.
By the indenture with the Proprietors of Mount
Auburn, dated December 18, 1858, the Society agreed
to pay to that corporation the sum of $9,008.49, that
being the estimated cost of one fourth part of the land
SALE AKD PUECHASE OF REAL ESTATE. 137
added to the cemetery since its separation from the
Society, with interest and other charges. Of this sum
$2,879.34 was paid in 1859, being half the amount due
the Society for sales in 1858. The balance, amounting,
with a year's interest, to $6,496.90, was paid on settle-
ment for the sales in 1859 ; and the Society was again
free from debt.
On the 5th of January, 1860, the Society consum-
mated the sale of all its real estate in School Street,
measuring 5,343 square feet, to Harvey D. Parker, at
thirteen dollars per foot, amounting to $69,459. It
received in payment a mortgage note for $60,000, at six
per cent, the interest to commence on the 1st of April,
when possession was to be given, and the balance in
cash, less the interest to that time, being $9,317.12. Of
this note $38,000 was paid at different times during the
year 1864, and the remaining $22,000 on the 3d of
January, 1865.
In August, 1863, the Society purchased the Mont-
gomery House estate for $101,000, paying $1,000 in
cash, and giving a mortgage — payable in gold hi twenty
years, with interest in currency at five and one half per
cent per annum — for $100,000. On the 6th of February,
1864, the Society, on the recommendation of the Build-
ing Committee, voted to erect a building on this land,
at a cost not exceeding $105,000. The assets of the
Society available for this purpose, consisting of H. D.
Parker's note, received in payment for the School Street
property, and of railroad stocks and other investments
of the surplus income, were estimated at $100,054.
On the completion of the hall, the cost, including
land, building, and new furniture, was found to be
$246,889 ; and the other property, consisting of the
138 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
library, furniture, and glass-ware, railroad stocks, and
cash in the treasury, made a total of $266,241.54. Be-
sides the mortgage debt of $100,000, the Society owed
a floating debt of £41,355.55, making the net property
$124,885.99.
At the beginning of the year 1869 the amount of
the floating debt was $11,000, which was paid in that
year, together with $6,000 of the mortgage debt. At
the close of the year 1875 the mortgage debt had been
reduced to $60,000, at which amount it still remains.
A floating debt of $12,000 has since been incurred,
which, with the amount of the Stickney Fund, payable
to Harvard College in 1899, makes the total debt of the
Society at the close of the year 1878 $84,000. The
property of the Society at the same time was estimated
to be, in real estate, furniture, and exhibition ware, at
cost, $256,585.56, library $18,067.45, and railroad
bonds at par $1,500, making a total of $276,153.01,
and leaving the net property $192,153.01.
If we seek for the causes which have given this
Society a financial position superior to that of any other
institution of this kind in the world, we shall find that
they arc mainly these two, — first, its fortunate connec-
tion with Mount Auburn, which has been already men-
tioned ; and, second, the integrity and skill with which
its revenues have been administered by its finance com-
mittees and treasurers. The Society, on its part, has
testified its appreciation of the faithfulness of these
officers by the long time during which it has continued
them in service. The Finance Committee was estab-
lished in 1835 ; and the first chairman, Elijah Vosc,
held that position for ten years. Josiah Stickney
served upon this committee from 1847 to 1857, and
FINANCE COMMITTEES AND TREASURERS. 139
again from 1859 to 1866, nineteen years in all, during
ten of which he was chairman. Marshall P. Wilder
was a member of the committee for seventeen years,
from 1849 to 1858, and from 1860 to 1866, and for ten
years chairman. The present chairman, Charles O.
Whitmore, has been upon the committee for seven-
teen years, having been first chosen in 1862, and has
been at its head for the last twelve years.
The first treasurer, Cheever Newhall, who lived to
the age of ninety years to rejoice in the prosperity of
the institution which he assisted in founding, served
from 1829 to 1833, and his successor, William Worth-
ington, from 1834 to 1837. The next treasurer was
Samuel Walker, from 1838 to 1848, when he was
elected president of the Society. He was succeeded by
Capt. Frederick W. Macondray, who had been in office
but about six months when he removed to California.
Capt. William Ii. Austin, the next treasurer, held the
office until the 2d of June 1866, when he resigned,
having served seventeen years. His successor, Edwin
W. Bus well, still continues in office. It will thus be
seen that the Society has had but six treasurers since
its foundation, and that the terms of office of three of
these, Messrs. Walker, Austin, and Buswell, aggregate
forty years, four-fifths of the time of the Society's exist-
ence.
We cannot better conclude this outline of the finan-
cial history of the Society than with the hope that it
may always in the future have as able, faithful, and
devoted managers of these interests as it has had in
the past.
CHAPTER V.
THE ROOMS OCCUPIED BY THE SOCIETY, INCLUDING THE
ERECTION AND DEDICATION OF THE FIRST AND SECOND
HORTICULTURAL HALLS.
As the reader has already learned, the first meetings
with reference to the formation of the Massachusetts
Horticultural Society were held in the office of Zebedee
Cook, Jr., who was engaged in the insurance business
at No. 7£ Congress Street, and there the Society was
organized. Mr. Cook's office was on the first floor,
and very convenient, and easy of access. Though the
building still remains, it has been much changed since
the Society was formed there. Three meetings of the
Society, on the 7th and 28th of April and the 12th
of May, were held at the same place, as were also the
meetings of the Council on the 24th of March and
the 7th of April. At the Council meeting March 24.
John C. Gray, Z. Cook, Jun., and Samuel Downer were
appointed a committee to procure a room for the use
of the members " of the Council and of the Society;"
and on the 9th of June the meeting of the Society was
held at " the Society's room." Three days later the
New England Farmer announced that " a very con-
venient and spacious room has been fitted up, over the
counting room of the New England Farmer. Xo. 52
North Market Street, for the use of the Society. The
room is furnished with various agricultural, and other
140
ROOM IN NORTH MARKET STREET. 141
periodical journals, and is open at all hours of the day
for the use of members. At this room will be deposited
all seeds, scions of superior fruits, drawings of fruits,
new implements of use in horticulture, books for the
library of the Society, and all fruits, vegetables, or
ornamental flowers that may be offered for the pre-
miums of the Society." In the same number of the
Farmer, the recording secretary, Robert L. Emmons,
gave notice of a meeting of the Society on the next
Saturday at " Horticultural Hall," and thus the Society
was provided with a local habitation.
We have mentioned in our introductory chapter the
agricultural warehouse of Joseph R. Newell, and the
office and seed store of John B. Russell, the publisher of
the Farmer, over it, as the general place of gathering
of the horticulturists and agriculturists in the vicinity of
Boston, and where the discussions which led to the
organization of the Horticultural Society took place.
In January, 1829, the office of the Farmer was removed
from the third to the second story, in the same room
with the agricultural warehouse ; and nothing could be
more natural than that the new society should occupy
the room thus vacated, which had been the familiar
haunt of so many of the members, with the agricultural
warehouse and Farmer office still in close proximity.
The room did not include the whole of the third floor
of the building, but only the front part, looking out
on Faneuil Hall and the then lately erected Quincy
Market, and through Merchants' Row to State Street.
It was very far from being what we should now call
" spacious ; " yet it sufficed for all the ordinary purposes
of the Society, — business meetings, exhibitions, library,
and a business and conversational exchange. Here we
142 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
can imagine Gen. Dearborn presiding, surrounded by
the founders and leading members of the Society, —
Cook, Bartlett, Downer, French, Xcwhall, Manning,
Kenrick, Phinncy, Williams, Winship, Emmons, Chand-
ler, Richards, Haggerston, Walker, Yose, Shurtleff,
Pratt, and others who have passed over the dark river,
and Russell, Breed, Ives, Wilder, Gray, P. 13. Ilovey,
Weld, and others who still remain to meet in the present
magnificent hall of the Society, so different from the
plain hired room which was then its home.
At a meeting of the Council on the 26th of September,
1829, John Prince and Samuel Downer were appointed
a committee to procure a pyramiclical set of shelves for
the better exhibition of flowers, etc. ; and at the same
time Gen. Dearborn and Messrs. Cook and Downer were
appointed to procure accurate drawings of our native
fruits. These paintings, which were obtained at con-
siderable expense, were framed for the embellishment
of the room, but were destroyed in the fire at the room
in Cornhill, in March, 1836.
After the Society removed, the room was again occu-
pied by the agricultural warehouse, and has so con-
tinued to this day ; the business having since 1836 been
carried on by the firm of Joseph Breck & Co., of which
the late venerable president of the Horticultural Society
was for thirty-seven years the head. The room was
rented by the Society of Mr. Russell, who had a lease
from the owner of the building, Nathaniel Hammond,
in possession of whose heirs it still remains.
In less than a year from the time this room was occu-
pied we find the Society looking out for new quarters.
Probably it had grown so that this was too small ; and
on the 13th of March, 1830, it was voted, " that it is
ROOMS IN JOY'S BUILDING. 143
expedient to procure a suitable room in some central
and convenient situation for the use of the Society ; "
and B. V.French, Thomas Brewer, and Z. Cook, Jun.,
were appointed a committee to ascertain where such a
room could be procured. In two weeks they reported
that they were unable to find a room possessing the
requisite conveniences, and were requested to make
further inquiries. May 8 they were instructed " to
petition the City Government for an apartment in the
Old State House, or any other city edifice, to be used
as the hall of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society."
On the 27th of November a meeting was held at the
Exchange Coffee House, " for the purpose of consulting
upon and adopting measures in relation to the procur-
ing a suitable room for the future meetings of the
Society." At this meeting the committee to procure
a room was discharged, and a new one appointed,
with full powers to procure and furnish suitable rooms.
They were, however, unsuccessful in finding a satisfac-
tory place until the next spring ; but on the 7th of
May, 1831, the meeting of the Society was held at the
rooms in Joy's Building, which, as appears from an
advertisement in the New England Farmer, were " Nos.
14 and 15 in the second gallery." These rooms were
much more commodious than the one previously occu-
pied ; but at the first meeting held there the Society
voted " that the committee appointed to secure rooms
request the owner of the building to enlarge, at his
own expense, the passage way between the two rooms
by cutting out another door, for the better accom-
modation of the Society," and they were accordingly
so connected, that, when desired, they could easily be
converted into one large room. On the 3d of Sep-
144 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
tember, 1831, the thanks of the Society were presented
to G. Thorburn & Sons for a bust of Linnaeus, which
was probably destroyed by the tire in Cornhill, with the
other decorations of the rooms.
The rent of these rooms was *50 a quarter, just
double that of the room in North Market Street, and
was paid at first to Joseph B. Joy, and afterwards to the
estate of B. Joy. This rent, which would now be thought
very moderate, was deemed too high at that time ; and
on the 17th of November, 1832, a vote was passed,
" that the treasurer be authorized to give notice to the
proprietor of this building that the Society will not
consider themselves tenants after three months from
this date, unless the said proprietor will consent to
reduce the rent to $100 per annum." On the 22d of
the next month a committee was appointed to procure
another room for the use of the Society, and on the
23d of February, 1833, they were requested to continue
their exertions, and to ascertain at what rate they could
procure the room adjoining the New England Farmer
office. On the 30th of March they reported, that, after
diligent search, they could not find a room more com-
modious than that then occupied by the Society. They
were accordingly discharged, and the Society continued
in the occupancy of the rooms, although the desired
reduction in the rent had not been made. On the 12th
of October a new committee was appointed, which was
more successful ; and on the 1st of February, 1834, the
Society met at their new hall, No. 81 Cornhill, which
name had a short time before been given to what was
previously known as Market Street. The room was in
the second story, over the seed store of Messrs. Ilovey
& Co., of whom the Society hired the rooms, they hav-
FIRE AT THE EOOMS IN CORNHILL. 145
ing a lease of the whole building from the owner,
Ebenezer Francis. It was while the Society occupied
these rooms, that the separation between it and the
owners of lots in Mount Auburn Cemetery took place ;
and the meeting on the 4th of October, 1834, for the
choice of officers, into which this question entered, was
held at the Old Common Council Room, Court Square,
to accommodate all who wished to attend. The meet-
ing at which the report of the committee to arrange
the terms of separation was made and accepted was
held at the hall over the Tremont Bank, then, as now,
at the corner of State and Congress Streets.
On Tuesday, March 15, 1836, a special meeting of
the Society was held at the store in Cornhill opposite
to that formerly occupied by Messrs. Hovey, to take
such measures as might be necessary in consequence of
a fire, which, during the preceding night, had nearly
destroyed the building in which was the Society's room.
This was one of four incendiary attempts the same
night, three of which were successful. The library was
but partially injured (somewhat by water) ; but the pic-
tures and ornaments of the room were mostly destroyed.
The damaged books were rebound and cleaned; but
some of them, among which are the costly folio vol-
umes of the New Duhamel, still show the discoloration
by smoke. The amount received in settlement with the
company by which the Society's property was insured
was $850.
At this time another effort was made to obtain better
accommodations, the Executive Committee being au-
thorized to engage them if possible ; but they reported
that, after diligent search, they had been unable to
obtain a room, which, on all accounts, would suit the
146 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
purposes of the Society, and had therefore engaged the
former room till the end of the lease. The room, after
being repaired, was accordingly again occupied for the
quarterly meeting on the 4th of June, the public being
invited by an advertisement in the newspapers to visit
the exhibition.
While the Society was occupying these rooms, Llew-
ellyn D. Jones, gardener to James Arnold of New Bed-
ford, presented a rustic chair of his own manufacture,
for which the thanks of the Society were voted on the
27th of September, 1834. It was ordered to be placed
in the hall, for the use of the presiding officer, and will
be remembered as having been so used for many years.
On the 18th of June, 1836, a letter was read from John
J. Low, announcing the donation of a painting of fruits,
in an elegant frame, for the decoration of the hall.
This painting, after following the migrations of the
Society, is suspended in the present Library Room. The
lease of this hall had not expired when it was vacated
by the Society, and it was underlet by them for the
remainder of the term.
We find no further movement towards changing the
quarters of the Society until the 2d of September, 1837,
when the Executive Committee presented a report in
relation to providing rooms better suited to the purposes
of the Society. In accordance with their report, the
committee was authorized to obtain the rooms at Xo. 23
Tremont Row (now No. 25 Tremont Street) ; the room
last occupied not being sufficiently large to enable the
great number of persons who wished to visit the shows
to enter, or to allow of a fan* display of the many
flowers sent for exhibition. The new room was in the
second story of the building, lighted from both front
HALL IN TREMONT ROW. 147
and rear, and far more commodious than any of those
previously occupied by the Society, being sufficiently
spacious for the annual exhibitions, which were held
there until the completion of the hall in School Street.
The hall was owned by William Appleton, and the
rent paid was $500 a year and the taxes. It was at
first hired for one year, at the close of which the
Finance Committee reported that it might be had for
another year at the same price. They were requested
to look out for another hall, but on the 6th of October
were authorized to hire the same hall for another year
at the same rent. Soon afterwards, the Executive Com-
mittee were authorized to let the hall for fairs, etc., on
other days than Friday and Saturday, at ten dollars per
day. The Society remained in this hall until the close
of the year 1844. It is now divided into several rooms
occupied as dentists' offices.
The meetings of the Society in January and Febru-
ary, 1845, were held in the " Committee Room in Tre-
mont Temple." This was the granite fronted building,
formerly the Tremont Theatre, which stood on the site
of the present Tremont Temple, and was burnt in 1852.
On Saturday, February 15, the Society adjourned to
meet on the 1st of March in the " Committee Room in
their new building on School Street."
We cannot wonder, that, after so many removals, and
unsuccessful attempts to obtain better accommodations,
the Society should have desired to possess a building of
its own. The first expression of this desire which has
come under our notice is contained in a resolve passed
at a meeting on the 27th of September, 1834, " That
the Committee of Finance be authorized to make an
investment of any unappropriated moneys in the treas-
148 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
urv. not exceeding one thousand dollars, in snek stock
as they shall deem advisable, the same to constitute an
accumulating fund, to be appropriated, whenever the
amount shall be adequate thereto, to the purchase of a
place for the meetings of the Society."
In a report made by President Vose, March 4, 1837,
on the general condition of the Society, after mention-
ing the amount received for sales of lots in Mount
Auburn, and the generous donations of Mr. Courtis, he
said, —
" I would beg leave to suggest for the consideration of the
Societ}*, that, keeping constantly in view the ultimate establish-
ment of that at which it has long been aiming, a garden of experi-
ment, whenever its funds shall be deemed adequate to the object,
it is of great importance that the Society be furnished with a place
of meeting, and for its exhibitions, better suited to its purposes
than it has heretofore been provided with. It is believed that no
part of the efforts of the Horticultural Society has been productive
of a more salutary influence than its weekly exhibitions : it is here
that practical men exhibit the results of their experiments in every
branch of culture ; here they interchange their views and opinions ;
and it is here, too, that the public is attracted to witness the beauti-
ful displays of flowers and of fruits, by which it is believed that
the taste is not only improved but often acquired for this interesting
pursuit. An investment of its funds in a suitable building in a
proper location might enable the Society to reserve such part of
it for its own use as would subserve its purposes ; and the rents
accruing from the residue might be accumulating in aid of the
ultimate objects of the Society."
In his opening address at the fourteenth anniversary
of the Society, September 16, 184*2, the president,
Marshall P. Wilder, said, " The patronage of the com-
munity has been so much augmented, that the Society
feels itself straitened in its present location, 1 and has in
1 In Tremont Row.
LATIN SCHOOL HOUSE PURCHASED. 149
contemplation at no distant day to erect an edifice
suitable in elegance and convenience to the importance
of the subject." Indeed, nearly a year previous to this
time, on the 30th of October, 1841, a committee had
been appointed to inquire after a suitable hall, room, or
rooms, for the use of the Society, by purchase, lease, or
otherwise. This was the first definite action on the
part of the Society looking to the possession of a
building of its own ; but the committee did not succeed
in finding a suitable location.
On the 19th of August, 1843, a committee, consisting
of President Wilder, B. V. French, Elijah Vose, Samuel
Walker, and Josiah Stickney, was authorized to contract
in behalf of the Society for a building or building lot
suitable for its purposes, if either should present itself,
which it would, in the opinion of the committee, be for
the interest of the Society to purchase. On the 6th
of January, 1844, the president, in behalf of the com-
mittee, reported that they had purchased for the Society
the estate belonging to the city of Boston, known as the
Latin School House, on School Street, containing 2,952
square feet of land, for the sum of $18,000. The
report concluded as follows : —
" Before closing this Report, your committee wish to name some
of the reasons which have influenced them ..in their doings ; and
first, they would state, that, in their opinion, the time has arrived
when the wants of the Society demand better and more extensive
accommodations than can be furnished in the present location ;
that the funds now in the treasury, with its prospective resources,
are such as to warrant an investment for this purpose, and that,
after the Society shall have appropriated such part of the building
as may be deemed necessary for its own convenience, there will
then be a portion left which may be fitted up for stores or shops,
and which will probably rent for a sum equal to the interest of any
150 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
loan which may be needed, in addition to its present funds, for the
purchase and alteration, or the remodelling of the same. Your
committee are also under the impression that the cost of the prop-
erty corresponds better with the means of the Society than any
other that they have met with, or that might offer itself at present,
and is capable of being made commensurate with its growth and
necessities for some years to come. And, further, that the estate.
situated as it is in a central part of the cit}', where real estate
must alwa} T s be valuable, cannot be a very bad investment, should
the Society hereafter, for any cause, wish to dispose of it."
The report of the committee was accepted, and a
Building Committee was appointed to take charge of
the alterations and improvements of the premises pur-
chased, who were instructed also to apply to the Gen-
eral Court for further powers to hold real estate.
The President, in connection with the Finance Com-
mitee, was authorized to borrow in the name of the
Society, any amount not exceeding fifteen thousand
dollars, to enable the Society to complete the purchase.
Architects were immediately employed to draw plans,
and make estimates, for the alteration of the building
so as to adapt it to the use of the Society ; but it was
finally decided to erect a new building.
At the meeting of the Society on the 14th of Sep-
tember, the chairman, in behalf of the Building Com-
mittee, presented a silver plate to be placed under the
corner stone of the Society's new hall, with certain doc-
uments. It was then voted to adjourn to the site of
the new building, and that the president be requested
to perform the duty of laying the corner stone, depos-
iting the plate, documents, etc., and to offer such
remarks as he might deem suitable to the occasion.
The plate was of silver, six by eight inches, and bore
the following inscriptions : —
LAYING OF THE CORNER STONE. 151
[On the Obverse.]
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Incorporated the 12th day of June, A.D. 1829.
PRESENT NUMBER OF MEMBERS, FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY.
With a list of the Officers and Standing Committees of
the Society.
[On the Reverse.]
THIS EDIFICE IS ERECTED BY
THE
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY,
FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENCOURAGING AND IMPROVING THE
SCIENCE AND PRACTICE OF HORTICULTURE.
THIS CORNER STONE LAID ON THE
14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1844.
BUILDING COMMITTEE :
Marshall P. Wilder, Samuel Walker, J. E. Teschemacher, Josiah
Stickney, John J. Lo"w, Benj. V. French, E. M. Richards,
Sam'l R. Johnson, C. M. Hovey, Cheever Newhall,
Joseph Breck, H. W. Dutton, Fred. W. Macondry.
ARCHITECT, RICHARD BOND.
BUILDERS:
GARDNER GREENLEAF, NATH'L ADAMS, C. W. CUSHLNG,
WILLARD SEARS, AND JONAS FITCH.
TO THIS SOCIETY THE COMMUNITY ARE
INDEBTED FOR THE FOUNDATION AND CONSECRATION OF
MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY.
Impressions of both these inscriptions were printed,
one copy being placed in the archives of the Society,
another presented to the Massachusetts Historical Soci-
ety, and a third to the American Antiquarian Society.
152 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
The documents and other articles mentioned as
placed in the corner stone were the Transactions, Ad-
dresses, etc., of the Society; a phial hermetically
sealed, and incased in powdered charcoal, containing a
great variety of flower, fruit, and vegetable seeds ;
various horticultural, agricultural, and political papers
of the day ; and a variety of the coins of the United
States. The whole were sealed up in a leaden box,
and deposited in the stone at the north-west corner of
the building ; and the large column designed to stand
upon it was lowered to its place. When the building
was sold and torn down, this box was reserved, and de-
posited, with another box, in the comer stone of the
present hall. The stone being firmly secured, the presi-
dent of the Society, Marshall P. Wilder, delivered an
address, in which he referred to the presence of gen-
tlemen whose names are borne on the charter of the
Society, and congratulated them and the members gen-
erally on the flourishing condition of the Society which
admitted the erection of an edifice for the promotion
and encouragement of horticulture. He adverted to
the approbation and favor so liberally extended to the
Society by an enlightened public ; to the signal favor
which had attended its almost every effort ; to its influ-
ence in creating and disseminating a taste for horti-
cultural pursuits and rural life ; to the introduction of
new and valuable varieties, and the unprecedented in-
crease and improved character of fruits and flowers
since its organization ; to the universal desire, diffused
by the zeal and labors of its members, for gardening
and ornamental cultivation ; and to the competition and
laudable emulation excited by its exhibitions and pre-
miums, all of which had greatly surpassed the highest
MEETING IN THE NEW LIBRARY ROOM. 153
expectations of its warmest friends. In conclusion he
alluded to the act of the Society in the foundation and
consecration of Mount Auburn as a measure calculated
to reflect honor upon any institution, and quoted from
Judge Story's address the passage in which he spoke of
the connection of the Horticultural Society with the
cemetery. 1
These services were attended, not only by the mem-
bers of the Society, but by many other citizens of Bos-
ton.
The meeting of the Society on the 1st of March,
1845, was held, agreeably to the adjournment before
mentioned, at the committee room in the new building,
when the president addressed the members in a few
pertinent remarks, adverting to the condition of the
Society at that day in comparison with that at the time
of its organization in 1829 ; to its influence in dissem-
inating a taste for gardening, and to the usefulness
which it was designed to exert in the cause of horti-
cultural improvement. On the 22d of March it was
voted that the new hall belonging to the Society should
be called Horticultural Hall, and that the lower back
room should be known as the Library Room. Although
the term "Horticultural Hall" had been sometimes
applied to the rooms previously occupied by the Society,
it was but seldom used, they being generally known
as the " Horticultural Rooms."
On the 19th of April the Building Committee reported
that the hall would be completed, and in readiness for
occupancy, on the 15th of May ; and in the evening of
that day, eight months from the time when the corner
stone was laid, it was appropriately dedicated to the
1 Ante, page 83.
154 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
uses of the Society. The services on this occasion were
most interesting and inspiring ; and the character and
ability of those who conducted them, the beauty of the
hall, the season of the year, the floral decorations, and
the brilliant assembly of ladies and gentlemen that
crowded the hall, all combined to make the event one
which will never be forgotten by any present. The
floral decorations, arranged with admirable taste by
David Ilaggerston, William Quant, and Alexander Mc-
Lennan, made the hall glow like a garden, and filled
it with their fragrance. Among them were superb
specimen plants of acacias and fuchsias from the presi-
dent of the Society ; splendid pelargoniums from Mr.
Quant, gardener to Thomas H. Perkins, and from the
conservatory of John P. Cushing, by Mr. Ilaggerston ;
a gorgeous Madame Desprez rose tree ten feet high,
and covered with hundreds of blooms, from Samuel
Sweetser ; ericas, cactuses, and other small plants, from
William Meller ; and baskets of flowers, and bouquets
of great beauty and variety, from Miss Russell, Azell
Bowditch, and others.
The members of the Society generally, with their
ladies, and various invited guests, filled the room.
Among those upon the platform with the president of
the Society were John Quincy Adams, ex-president
of the United States ; Gov. George N. Briggs, Lieut.
Gov. John Reed, Ex-Gov. Samuel T. Armstrong, Ex-
Mayor Martin Brimmer, Hon. James Arnold, lion.
Samuel Hoar, Hon. Samuel H. Walley, Jun.,and others.
The exercises consisted of a brief introductory ad-
dress by the president, Marshall P. Wilder ; reading
from the Scriptures by the Rev. George Putnam ; prayer
by the Rev. William M. Rogers ; an original song,
MR. LUNTS DEDICATION ADDRESS. 155
" Flora's Invitation," by Thomas Power ; a hymn by the
Rev. William C. Croswell ; and an address by the Hon.
George Lnnt of Newburyport. Mr. Maeder presided at
the piano, and was aided by Misses Stone and Emmons,
and Messrs. Marshall and Aiken, w T ho sang with fine
effect the poetry contributed for the occasion.
In his oration, Mr. Lunt discoursed of the benevolent
order of Nature ; of the rewards which she has for her
students ; of the infinite variety of her manifestations,
especially in flowers, with their domestic, public, and
religious associations ; of the illustrious names connected
with the history of gardening ; of the delight of child-
hood and old age in a garden ; and of the influence
of rural scenes upon the literature of a nation. The
address abounded in classical and poetical allusions, and
concluded as follows : —
"It has been recently stated that the average value of the
plants in a single horticultural establishment of London is esti-
mated at a million of dollars. And oh, before this magnificent
result had been reached from the comparatively trifling beginning
of a few centuries ago, what infinite care and cost must have been
expended ; what love for the generous science must have been
fostered and encouraged ; what distant and unknown regions had
been visited, and rifled of the glories of the plains and woods !
From solitary Lybian wastes and those paradises of Persia, the
Land of Roses, so eloquently described by Xenophon ; from
' Isles that crown the iEgean deep,'
to the boundless expanse of this bright heritage of ours ; from
Tartarian deserts to prairies of perpetual bloom ; from the fertile
breadth of fields beneath the southern skies to the strange con-
tinents of foreign seas and verdant islands of the ocean,
• ' Whose lonely race
Resign the setting sun to Indian worlds.'
" Combined with this adventurous spirit of modern discovery is
another principle, which has proved eminently favorable to the
156 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
interests of horticultural science. The higher social condition of
those softer companions of our garden walks and labors and gentle
cares, the more liberal position awarded them under the influence
of advancing civilization, our deeper interest in their moral and
intellectual culture, and our more generous regard for their innocent
gratification, have interwoven a thousand graces and refinements,
once unknown, amongst the coarser texture of social life. Never,
indeed, do the}' enter so intimately into our joys and griefs and
affections, as in gardens and amongst flowers. For them, and not
for ourselves, we reclaim the scattered blossoms along the wilder-
nesses of Nature : we ask of them a more tasteful care in the
cultivation of their beauties, and, for their pleasure and adornment,
we mingle their glorious hues into innumerable shapes of grace
and loveliness.
" Welcome, then, for this, if for no other cause, the hall which
3'ou have thus prepared, and decorated and garlanded with the
choicest treasures of the spring. Long, long ma}* it stand, an
evidence of no vain or idolatrous worship. Unlike those grosser
handiworks of cold and glittering marble, which crowned in ancient
daj-s the baren cliff, or looked in lifeless beauty
' Far out into the melancholy main,'
but touched with the spirit of every gentle and noble association,
and consecrated by the soul of all our dearest affections, welcome,
to them and to us, be this temple of the fruits and flowers."
The building thus dedicated, and of which a view is
here given, was, so far as is known, the first ever
erected by a horticultural society for similar purposes.
The front was of granite, of chaste Grecian style. The
lower story was composed of four massive Doric piers ;
the opening on the right being the main entrance to the
hall, and the centre and left respectively the door and
window to the store, which occupied the larger part of
this story. Above the piers was a plain frieze and
cornice, forming a base for the fluted Corinthian pilasters
which ornamented the principal story, and which were
surmounted by a suitable entablature and pediment.
Hoi l Hall,
School Street.
Erccte
DESCRIPTION OF THE HALL. 157
Between the pilasters were windows with a sunk panel
over each. Back of the store, lighted from Chapman
Place, was the Library Room, used also for the meetings
of the Society, and committees. This room was at first
entered directly from Chapman Place, and from a pas-
sage way in the rear ; but in 1849 a door was cut con-
necting it with the store, which was found much more
convenient. In the rear passage way referred to was a
door opening from Chapman Place, and at the opposite
end stairs to the hall above. This was ninety feet in
length, thirty-one in width, and twenty-five in height.
It was decorated with Corinthian pilasters, with stylo-
bate and entablature, to correspond to the front. The
rear was semicircular in form, having on the right a
door to the stairs leading to the room below, and on the
left one opening into a closet for the exhibition ware.
Between these doors was a stand with receding stages
for pot plants. On each side of this stand was a
pedestal, one being surmounted by a statue of Hebe,
and the other by a statue of a Dancing Girl. Two long
tables for fruit extended lengthwise of the hall, with
another on the western side against the wall ; while
against the eastern side and the northern end were
stands for cut flowers. Two circular flower stands also
stood near the northern end. The first public ex-
hibition in the new hall was held on Saturday, May
31, 1845.
A short time before the dedication of the hall, John
J. Low addressed a note to the president, of which the
following is a part : " Feeling an interest in our excel-
lent institution, the Massachusetts Horticultural Society,
and also a desire to add to the appearance of our beauti-
ful hall, I have caused to be placed there a clock, which
158 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
will not only be in a degree ornamental, but also serve
to prompt us all to make the best use of the moments
as they so rapidly pass away." This clock is now over
the stage in the lower hall of the present building.
Soon after, Josiah Bradlcc presented a pan of large
and elegant China vases, which not only served to orna-
ment the hall, but, at the annual exhibition, contained
a pan of large bouquets ; the " Bradlee Plate " being
offered as a prize for the best. On the 21st of April,
18-49, George B. Jones presented a large and valuable
china vase, and on the 27th of September, 1856, he
added two more. On the 3d of March, 18-49, a letter
was received from Dr. Samuel P. Hildreth, an eminent
pomologist of Marietta, O., accompanied by a painting
of fruits grown at that place, which was suspended in
the Library Room, and is now in the present Library
Room.
The store under the hall was first leased to Samuel
Walker, then to Walker & Co., and afterwards to Azell
Bowditch, and was used by all for the sale of horticul-
tural articles. During the winter season, and at other
times when not wanted by the Society, the hall was let
for various purposes.
The possession of a home of its own, by making the
Society and its objects more widely known, contributed
greatly to extend its reputation and influence, and at
this period, the Society began to take that prominent
position which it has since maintained throughout the
country. The building of which an account has been
given was the abode of the Society for fifteen years of
harmony and prosperity, and to it many of the mem-
bers look back with the greatest interest. But, al-
though ample for the weekly shows, the first annual
A LARGER HALL NEEDED. 159
exhibition held in the new hall proved it to be hardly
sufficient for the occasion ; and in 1848 the annual
exhibition was held in Faneuil Hall. Indeed, this had
been predicted by the writer of the account of the
annual exhibition of 1844, who, after speaking of the
large quantity of fruit contributed for which there was
no room on the tables, and of the larger accommoda-
tions when the new hall should be occupied the next
year, added, " But we greatly mistake the signs of the
times, if the contributions of future years will not
increase to an extent far beyond our contemplated
arrangements."
In his annual address on the 4th of January, 1851,
President Walker said, —
' ' The increasing taste for horticultural pursuits requires prompt
and corresponding action to enable us to keep pace with the times.
The question with us now is, not what can be done, but rather
what shall be done first, to meet the demands of the community
and the wants of the Society. An experimental garden, enlarged
and more extended annual exhibitions under tents, etc., are sub-
jects full of interest, and may well occiqrv the attention, and here-
after require the deliberate consideration, of the Society. But
gentlemen, a permanent Temple, of ample dimensions to meet all
the wants of the Society and the wishes of the public, is the first
thing that I would suggest for your consideration. Let us obtain
a suitable location, a Home. For this purpose let us economize
our resources, tax our time and our energies, and, if needs be,
our fortunes, for this desirable consummation of the wishes of our
friends and the founders of the Society. Many of them saw only
through the vista with the eye of hope : it is our duty and our
privilege to carry out their designs, and to fill up the picture as
it once presented itself to the vision of the Lowells, the Stop's,
the Lymans, the Brimmers, the Courtises, the Bradlees, and the
Princes. Without a hall to exhibit to advantage all the specimens
raised by horticultural efforts, we cannot fully accomplish our
highest aim, — the dissemination of a knowledge of, and a love
1G0 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
for, horticulture. Imbue the public with this, and the emulation
thai it will create between amateurs, and the competition among
cultivators for the market, will be sufficient to fill, in a few years,
the largest hall we could desire to possess.
" Having expressed my views thus frankly on this subject,
permit me to touch upon details by suggesting whether a hall in
every way suited to horticulture might not be built and fitted up
with reference to its soul-stirring kindred spirit, Music, where
the warbling voice and the 'Bird Song' might be wafted, like the
gentle zephyr, among the trees, the buds, the blossoms, and
the flowers, to ravish the ear, while the eye should be charmed by
the gems of lovely spring, or the golden drops and purple hues of
gorgeous autumn."
Not only was the hall insufficient for the annual
exhibitions, but the Library Room was ill lighted and
damp, rendering it unsuitable for a reading-room, as
well as liable to injure the valuable books there depos-
ited. Accordingly, when in August, 1852, the owner
of the estate in the rear of the hall offered it for sale,
it was purchased by the Society with a view of extend-
ing the building so as to afford better accommodations.
In the summer of 185-4 the subject of selling the
Society's real estate to Harvey D. Parker, who was then
erecting his hotel upon the adjoining land, was consid-
ered ; but no sale was made at that time. An arrange-
ment was, however, effected by which a narrow strip of
land, with the right to use one half the western wall of
the Society's building, was sold to Mr. Parker, the
Society receiving from him the sum of $1,553.74, and
the right to use the division wall to be erected by him,
in case they should extend their building southward.
On the 6th of November, 1858, Eben Wight, Samuel
Walker, George W. Pratt, Edward S. Rand, Jim., and
F. Lyman AVinship were appointed a committee " to
PROJECT OF ALTERING THE HALL. 161
take into consideration the present insufficient accom-
modations of the Society, to consider the expediency of
disposing of the present estate, to ascertain what more
suitable location can be procured, and the probable cost
of erecting a building sufficient for all the wants of the
Society ; also to consider the feasibility of so altering
the present building by enlarging the same, or of re-
building on the present site, as to afford adequate
accommodations for the present, and also to meet the
increasing wants of the Society." President Breck, in
his annual address on the 1st of January, 1859, after
alluding with approval to the appointment of this com-
mittee, described the accommodations needed, as, in
addition to a large exhibition room, one of smaller
dimensions for winter, and other light and airy rooms
for the library, and for meetings of the Society and
of committees, and in connection with these, or a com-
bination of them, the conveniences of a horticultural
exchange, where the members might meet from week
to week to hold social intercourse, and recount their
successes or failures, discuss the merits of the last new
fruit or flower, or communicate whatever might relate
to the subject which they had so much at heart. On
the 5th of March, 1859, the committee reported prog-
ress, and were authorized to employ an architect to
estimate and draught plans for such alterations in the
building as they might desire. The estate on the north-
erly side of Winter Street, then occupied by the Central
Congregational Church, was brought to the attention
of the committee, and designs and estimates for a build-
ing on that site were procured ; but the idea was after-
wards relinquished.
On the 5th of November, 1859, the subject of dispos-
L62 .MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ing of the property of the Society, and of procuring
other accommodations, was referred to the Executive
and Finance Committees. On the 17th of December,
the joint committee made their report, from which the
following is an extract : " A portion of your committee
were in favor of rebuilding upon the present site; but,
upon careful estimate's, it was found that a building such
as could be erected upon our present property, though
perhaps sufficient for our present wants, would not be
such as would be creditable to the Society, or satisfactory
to individual members, and also that a suitable build-
ing would involve an expenditure of from twenty to
thirty thousand dollars, without increasing the value of
the Land in like proportion, or being such as would
afford a large income to the Society." The committee
further stated that they had received from Harvey D.
Parker what they considered a most liberal offer for the
property, and that they regarded the acceptance of it as
greatly for the interest of the Society. At a meeting a
week later, the Society voted to accept the offer of Mr-
Parker, and to sell the property on the conditions men-
tioned in the preceding chapter; and the site of the
hall is now occupied by the ladies' dining room and
adjacent corridor of the Parker House.
In his annual address, on the 7th of January, 1860,
Presidenl Breck, after alluding to the advantageous sale
of the Society's property, said, "We shall leave this
spot with feelings of deep regret; for here we have
enjoyed many pleasant meetings. This is the place
where we have first seen many new fruits and flowers,
whore we have acquired much horticultural knowledge,
and whore, for many years, the associations have con-
tinued satisfactory and pleasant."
PORTRAITS OF THE PRESIDENTS. 163
Before the time for vacating its hall, the Society had
secured rooms at the corner of Washington and West
Streets, with entrances from both streets. The rooms
were all upon one floor ; and the largest, previously
known as Amory Hall, was a spacious, airy, and pleas-
ant room, sufficiently large for the weekly, though not
for the annual exhibitions. The large room in the rear
was well adapted for the meetings of the Society and its
committees, as well as for the library and reading room.
In some respects, the Society was better accommodated
here than ever before.
While occupying these rooms, the Society received
from L. M. Sargent, December 15, 1860, the present of
a painting, by Henry C. Pratt, of the Cereus giganteus, a
cactus found in the hot and arid regions of New Mexico,
which is now suspended in the library room.
While here, also, the collection of portraits and busts
of the presidents and other prominent members and
benefactors of the Society, which now ornaments its
halls, may be said to have been commenced ; the only
one previously owned by the Society being the bust of
Theodore Lyman. On the 5th of January, 1861, a
committee was appointed to consider the expediency of
procuring portraits of the past and present presidents,
to be placed in the rooms of the Society. The commit-
tee having reported, a month later, in favor of procur-
ing such portraits, the sum of $1,000 was appropriated
for the purpose ; and on the 5th of May they an-
nounced that they had procured portraits of H. A. S.
Dearborn and Marshall P. Wilder, by Miss Stewart ;
Zebedee Cook and Joseph S. Cabot, by Brackett ; Eli-
jah Vose, by Young ; Samuel Walker and Josiah Stick-
ney, by Hartwell ; and Joseph Breck, by Pratt.
164 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
On the 31st of March, 1863, Charles O. Whitmore
offered for the acceptance of the Society a marble bust,
1,\ Henry Dexter, of Marshall P. Wilder. In the letter
conveying this offer, Mr. Whitmore recounted the ser-
vices of Mr. Wilder to the country and the Society, —
the latter then extending over a period of thirty years, —
and especially his services upon the committee which
arranged the separation between the Society and the
Proprietors of Mount Auburn, when Mr. Wilder pro-
posed the terms of settlement ultimately adopted. It
was these last mentioned services which the bust was
particularly intended to commemorate.
Although these rooms were in many respects so con-
venient, they were further south than was desirable;
and at every meeting and exhibition all the members,
and all the articles shown, were obliged to ascend two
flights of stairs. Indeed, they were never thought of as
a permanent home for the Society; and an effort in
which the Society had engaged before leaving the
School Street Hall, to obtain from the Commonwealth
the grant of a reservation of land on the Back Bay,
on which it might erect a building suitable to its pur-
. was continued after its removal. This movement
made in connection with the Boston Society of
Natural History and other scientific and educational
associations. It was believed, that, if these various
institution'- could be congregated together, it would be
not merely for their own benefit, but for the advan-
of science, education, agriculture, and commerce
throughout the Commonwealth and the Union. The
Horticultural Society pledged itself, if the grant was
obtained, to take possession of the land when filled
and graded, and prepare the same for immediate plant-
MONTGOMERY HOUSE PURCHASED. 165
ing, and, within five years from the time of the grant,
to erect a crystal palace or conservatory for their own
use, and for the growth of plants, commensurate with
the wants of the Society and the progress of horticul-
tural science, and honorable alike to the city and Com-
monwealth.
These efforts, though continued for two years, were
unsuccessful; and on the 7th of December, 1861, the
Executive Committee was instructed to be on the
lookout for a location for the Society. The Finance
Committee was soon after added to the Executive Com-
mittee, and on the 5th of April, 1862, the joint com-
mittee was empowered, if they should find a suitable
location in Washington or Tremont Street, or the
streets between these, not further south than Winter
Street, to contract for it in the name of the Society.
After reporting progress from time to time, the com-
mittee made their final report on the 15th of August,
1863, which was, that they had purchased for the Soci-
ety the Montgomery House estate on Tremont Street,
which had generally been admitted by the members
to be the most central and desirable location obtain-
able. The estate was reported as containing about
6,300 square feet, the dimensions being 55 feet and 5
inches on Tremont Street, 123 feet and 9 inches on
Bromfield Street, 120 feet and 7 inches on Montgomery
Place, and 52 feet and 3 inches on the rear line. The
conditions of the purchase have been given in the pre-
ceding chapter. In their preliminary report, on the
7th of February, 1863, the committee stated that the
only other estate within the prescribed boundaries
which had attracted then notice was that known as the
Tremont Temple, which they had learned might be for
L66 RiASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
sale. They, however, regarded the Montgomery House
estate as far preferable.
The report of the committee was accepted, and the
president and treasurer were authorized and directed
to sign and execute all papers necessary to complete
the purchase. In accordance with the recommenda-
tion of the committee, the estate was placed in the
charge of the Finance Committee until the Society
should decide to erect a building upon it.
At the annual meeting on the 2d of January, 1864,
President Ilovey and Josiah Stickney, Charles O. Whit-
more, Marshall P. Wilder, Joseph S. Cabot, "William
K. Austin. II. II. Hunncwell, James F. C. Flyde, and
Leander Wetherell were appointed a committee to con-
sider the expediency of erecting a building on the site
of the Montgomery House. This committee on the
6th of February made a unanimous report, from which
the following portions are extracted: —
•■ Your committee believe it is for the permanent interest of the
Society to proceed with the erection of :i building, if it can be done
within its means, or with safety :is an investment of its funds.
The question of time is one to which they have given much atten-
tion: and. Looking at it in all its aspects, they feel assured, with
such a plan as they have had prepared, — should it meet the wishes
ami approval of the Society. — a building can be erected at a reason-
ably enhanced price, without detriment to its present interests or
future welfare, which will afford a good income upon the outlay,
and. what is of the most importance, place the Society in posses-
sion of n hall of its own, where it can accommodate all the exhibi-
weekly or annual, — a building that shall be an ornamenl
to .,iii- city. • a fitting testimonial of our liberality,' and one which
will enable us to carry forward the great objects of its founders,
viz.. • Encouraging and improving the science of horticulture.'
•• At an early stage «.f the action of the Society, a committee of
fire was chosen to purchase a suitable site within certain limits:
REPORT OF COMMITTEE. 167
and that committee, desirous of serving the interests and forward-
ing the objects of the Society, which they believed to be to secure
a handsome and appropriate building, selected the Montgomery
House estate, and had plans and estimates, prepared by G. J. F.
Bryant, placed before them and the Society. These estimates
showed that the building could have been erected in 1862 for
$85,000. This plan has been materially and essentially altered
in its interior arrangements, while its exterior character has been
preserved, and, it is confidently hoped, its architectural propor-
tions improved, its fitness augmented, and its beauty of design
much enhanced. It is now presented with the full belief that,
after much study, it comes as near as possible to the wants and
requirements of the Society both as regards its own uses and that
equalby important one of income. It has had the earnest attention
and deliberation of some of the committee, and is offered with the
hope and expectation that it will be satisfactory to all."
"The entire cost of the erection of the building, according to
the estimates of Mr. Biyant now made to your committee, and pro-
cured from responsible parties, and since revised, will not exceed
$102,500 ; and, when the offers are open to competition, he believes
it will be reduced. When your committee take into consideration
the greatly enhanced value of the stocks owned by the Society
over that of 1862, this excess over the estimates of the first plan is
far more favorable than they were led to anticipate.
"The income of the building, according to the best judgment
of your committee, after careful inquiry as to the income of prop-
erty in the immediate vicinity, will be fully equal to six per centum
per annum on the entire investment.
"To meet the cost of the erection of the building, your com-
mittee herewith annex a statement of the assets of the Society
available for that purpose, very carefully and accurately prepared
by the treasurer, and believed to be correct, amounting to $100,054
on the 23d of January last.
" To meet the payment of the mortgages upon the estate, paya-
ble in twenty years from September 1, 1863, it is proposed by your
committee to recommend to the Society, immediately upon the
completion of the building, the creation of a sinking fund, which
shall meet its liabilities in 1883. This proposition is to lay aside
every year $3,500 from the income of Mount Auburn, which will,
with interest, amount in sixteen years to $98,745.
1G8 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
•■ The deep interest which mil bo created by the erection of a
new building, it is believed by your committee will greatly in-
crease the Dumber of members, and the income from this source
and it- exhibitions will probably be sufficient to pay the ordinary
expenses of the Society ; and. should this hope be realized, a larger
sum can be added to the sinking fund, should the Society so direct,
which will enable it (if opportunity offers, which it is thought pos-
sible it 1 1 1 .- 1 \ ) to pay off some of the mortgages (which are made to
six parties) before the period of their expiration, or leave to the
S ietj a much larger sum to encourage the objects to which it is
especially devoted.
•• Four committee cannot here omit to contrast the present con-
dition of the Society with its condition in 1*1:;. when it decided to
purchase the Latin Schoolhouse in School Street for the sum of
,000, with only $15,000 available funds for the purpose. It
then almost unanimously voted to erect a building upon the site,
which, with the land, would cost about 840,000. If the attempt to
build dow can be termed a hazardous enterprise, with its increased
means, much larger number of members, and the far greater public
taste for horticulture and rural art, what must the action of the
Society have Keen deemed in 1843? Its prospective income could
not then be considered, at the outside, as more than $2,500, and the
income from the building less than five per centum; and, to carry
forward the work, it was necessary to execute a mortgage for
$15,000, besides using a n the income from Mount Auburn for four
yens. Yet it went on prosperously, meeting all its liabilities
promptly, distributing very liberally of its means for the encour-
agemenl of horticultural and pomologies] science: and. thanks to
those who labored so faithfully, we are now receiving the benefit of
the sound judgment and foresight, united with zeal and energy,
of those w l„, laid the foundation of our success, and gave to the
- aety more .Mended influence and the means of far greater
usefulness.
"In conclusion, your committee would advise the immediate
erection of a building worthy of that art and science of which it
shall be the home, and from which their benign influence shall
spread throughout the land."
The committee recommended that they be constituted
OBSTACLES OVERCOME. 169
a building committee, and authorized to proceed with
the erection of a building on the Montgomery House
estate, according to the plans and estimates of Mr.
Bryant, then submitted to the Society, and to make all
necessary contracts and agreements ; and that the com-
mittee having charge of the estate be directed to termi-
nate the lease on the first of May. It was then unani-
mously voted, that the whole matter of erecting a
building be referred to the committee, with full powers ;
and that such alterations in the plans and specifications,
as they should suggest, be made under the superintend-
ence of the architect, Gridley J. F. Bryant, and at a
cost not exceeding the sum of $105,000.
Though there had been but one opinion as to the
eligibility of the site finally purchased over that of any
other^ offered, in securing it the committee met with
many obstacles, arising from the fact that the estate was
owned by several persons, and from the fears entertained
by many of the more timid or conservative members,
that, in purchasing with the intention of building, the
Society was assuming too great a risk. The committee
labored long and assiduously to overcome these obstacles ;
and their ultimate success is due to the persistent efforts
of Charles O. Whitmore, one of the members. In like
manner, the more cautious members of the Society were
doubtful of the expediency of building at the time this
enterprise was undertaken ; but the perseverance and
determination of the president of the Society and chair-
man of the Building Committee, Charles M. Hovey,
triumphed over every hindrance, and carried the work
on to success.
On the 5th of March the committee reported, that, in
accordance with the vote of the Society, they had made
170 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and executed contracts with responsible parties for the
entire construction of the building within the amount to
which they were limited. In the plan submitted to the
Society the Tremont Street facade only was of granite,
and the Bromfield Street and Montgomery Place facades
of brick ; but the committee had the pleasure of in-
forming the Society, that, notwithstanding the very
important alteration they had made, in substituting
Concord granite for the two sides, the estimate for which
was about $5,000, they had been enabled to secure for
the Society a beautiful granite structure throughout for
the sum of $104,630. On the 2d of April the Society
voted to place all its available funds at the disposal of
the president and Finance Committee, for the erection
of the new building. At the meeting on the 7th of
May, the treasurer stated that the Montgomery IJouse
had been formally given up by the lessee. The demoli-
tion of the old building and the erection of the new
were commenced immediately after.
By the loth of August the work had so far pro-
gressed that a special meeting of the Society was called
to make 1 arrangements for laying the corner stone.
The president stated, that, while it was not the desire
of the committee to make any ostentatious display,
tin 1 importance of the building was such as to render
it proper that the cornerstone should be laid with
appropriate ceremonies. A committee was accordingly
appointed to make the necessary arrangements, agree-
ably to which his Honor Mayor Lincoln, and members
of the City Government, the members of the Massa-
chusetts Charitable Mechanic Association and of the
Boston Society of Natural History, the trustees of
Mount Auburn Cemetery, the members of the Massa-
LAYING OF THE CORNER STONE. 171
chusetts Historical Society and of the Institute of
Technology, the trustees of the Public Library, the
members of the Massachusetts Society for Promoting
Agriculture and of the Boston Numismatic Society,
with other invited guests, and the past officers and pres-
ent members of the Society, met at the rooms in
Amory Hall at 9 o'clock a.m. on the 18th of August,
and thence, under the marshalship of Samuel Hatch,
proceeded up West Street, through Tremont Street
Mall and Tremont Street, to the site of the new build-
ing, where a platform was erected for their accommoda-
tion. After music by the Brigade Band, the president
delivered an address, in which he alluded to the foun-
dation of the Society, and its objects, which they were
then assembled to promote by the erection of a building
for its use ; to the laying of the corner stone of the first
horticultural hall almost twenty years before; to the
founders of the Society (some of whom were present),
and especially to Gen. Dearborn ; to the progress
and beneficial influence of the Society ; to its interest
in Mount Auburn Cemetery ; to Samuel Appleton,
John A. Lowell, Theodore Lyman, Josiah Bradlee,
Benjamin V. French, and H. Hollis Hunnewell, as its
benefactors, not forgetting the intelligent amateur and
other cultivators, both among the living and the dead,
to whom the Society is indebted for the invaluable
services and unflagging zeal which have given it a
renown second to that of no other horticultural associ-
ation.
At the close of the address the corner stone was laid
by the president, who deposited under it a zinc box,
containing a silver plate eight inches long and six wide
with the following inscriptions : —
172 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
[On the Obverse.]
THIS EDIFICE IS ERECTED
BY THE
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY,
FOB TOE PURPOSE OP ENCOURAGING AND IMPROVING THE
SCIENCE AND PRACTICE OF HORTICULTURE,
And this Corner Stone laid August 18, 1864,
BY THE PRESIDENT,
CHARLES M. IIOVEY.
BUILDING COMMITTEE.
0. M. HOVEY. WILLIAM R. AUSTIN.
JOSIAH 8TICKXKY. H. H. HUXXEWELL.
UAROTTAT.T, p. WILDER. JOSEPH S. CABOT.
C. O. WHITMORE. JAMES F. C. HYDE.
LEANDER WETHERELL.
ARCHITECTS:
GRTDLEY J. F. BRYANT AND ARTHUR GILMAN.
TO THIS SOCIETY THE COMMUNITY ARE INDEBTED FOR THE FOUNDATION
AND CONSECRATION OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY.
[On the Reverse.]
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Incorporated the 12th day of June, 1829.
present number of members six hundred and eighty.
PRESIDENT.
CHARLES M. HOVEY.
VICE-PRESIDENTS.
J. F. C. HYDE. C. O. WHITMORE.
H. HOLLIS HUNNEWELL. W. C. STRONG.
TREASURER.
WLLLIAM R. AUSTIN.
CORRESPONDING SECRETARY. RECORDING SECRETARY.
EUEX WIGHT. F. LYMAN WINSHIP.
PROGRESS OF .THE BUILDING. 173
The box contained also the Transactions of the Soci-
ety from 1843 to 1864; the publications of the Society,
containing its History, etc., by Gen. Dearborn ; the
Boston Almanac for 1864 ; Catalogue of the Proprietors
of Mount Auburn Cemetery ; copies of Hovey's Maga-
zine of Horticulture for 1864, containing the Reports
of the Building Committee ; a copy of the Fruits of
America ; Boston newspapers of August 18 ; a silver
and a bronze medal of the Society, and an Appleton
bronze medal ; and coins of the United States of the
date of 1864. Beneath it was placed the box, with
its contents entire, which was taken from beneath the
corner stone of the old hall in School Street. Both
boxes were placed in a cavity in the first vermiculated
stone at the north-west corner of the building, on Tre-
mont Street and Montgomery Place. After the laying
of the corner stone an appropriate prayer was offered
by the chaplain, Rev. Dr. Lothrop. The whole audi-
ence then joined in singing Old Hundred, and the
ceremonies were concluded with a benediction.
The erection of the building progressed favorably
during the summer of 1864 ; and early in January, 1865,
it was roofed in, and ready for the interior finishing. A
short time previously the Building Committee had been
authorized to substitute granite for wood, as specified
in the original contract, in the central attic of the Tre-
mont Street facade forming the pedestal for the statue
of Ceres, at an expense of not more than $2,500. On
the 1st of July the building was so nearly completed,
that the Building Committee was directed to make
arrangements for its dedication. At the same time,
the subject of discontinuing the weekly shows, on ac-
count of the expiration of the lease of Amory Hall,
174 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
considered; but it was afterwards decided to hold
them in one of the unoccupied stores in the new build-
ing. On the 5th of August the meeting of the Society
held for the first time in the library room of the
new building, when the president delivered an address
of welcome to the members, and congratulated them
upon the possession of a new and elegant building.
On Mie lGth of September the building was dedi-
cated, the exercises consisting of prayer by the Rev. F.
1). Huntington, D.D.. an address by President Hovey, a
song written for the occasion, and sung by Ball's Quar-
tette Choir, and closing with a benediction. The exer-
were interspersed with music by the Germania
Band.
In the opening of his address the president bade the
members welcome to their new hall : —
•• Welcome, then, thrice welcome, to this Temple of Fruits and
Flowers which you have reared, over which Ceres, Flora, and
Pomona shall preside. Here shall each hold high court, and all
who worship at their shrine bring annually their chosen offerings,
'Flowers of all hue, and without thorn the rose,'
wreathed and garlanded in all the fancied forms of grace and love-
liness which cultivated taste may direct. Here bring your orchard
treasures, —
' The wide projected heaps of apples,'
1 The Pippin burnished o'er with gold,'
1 The juicy pear
In soft profusion scattered round,'
ami make this ample hall like fair Pomona's arbor,
' With flowerets decked, and fragrant smells, — "
;i prophecy and an invitation which met a fitting re-
sponse in the annual exhibition of the succeeding week.
The address continued with an interesting summary
PRESIDENT HO VET'S DEDICATION ADDRESS. 175
of the history of the Society, which, said the speaker,
" is the history of horticulture in our country," and
after mention of the progress of horticulture in Eng-
land, the formation of the London Horticultural Soci-
ety, and the introduction of American plants, con-
cluded thus : —
" If, through a period of more than thirty years, you have, by
your devotion to the great purposes of the Society, followed it
from place to place, cheered and encouraged by its onward prog-
ress, until it has reached the elevated position it now holds,
how great must be 3-our delight, and what deep emotions of grati-
tude must spring up in your hearts, that you have found a perma-
nent home ! In the contemplation of the past, as well as in the
anticipations of the future, how much there is to awaken in us
renewed feelings of joy, exultation, and pride, not in a vain or
arrogant spirit, but humbly thankful, that, through the course of
so many 3-ears, unvarying success should have attended your labors,
harmonious action governed 3-our deliberations, and a judicious
administration of }"Our affairs enabled you to erect this costly and
beautiful edifice !
" But let not this prosperity decrease your ardor, or lessen your
labors in 3-0111* favorite pursuit. Rather let it rekindle and fire
3 r our zeal for new conquests. Your duties and responsibilities
have increased with 3'our growth. If 3'ou have pulled down, that
3-011 might build greater, if 3 T ou have grasped the prize of a life-
long ambition, let not this result satisfy 3*ou. If 3011 are the
possessor of a garden filled with beautiful trees or shrubs, to which
3'ou ma3 T retire from the turmoil of the crowded city, and among
whose sylvan shades 3*ou take 3 T our daily walk, making them 3 T our
companions and friends, come hither often with branch, or flower,
or beriT, to inspire the same delight in others. Or, if 3 r ou are
only the owner of a little spot of ground filled with the choicest
flowers, whose constant nurture has occupied the moments snatched
from life's busy scenes, and whose opening blossoms are daity
eloquent with lessons of grace and loveliness, do not refuse to
offer them here as tokens of your affection, and triumphs of 3'our
art. And, if neither tree nor flower nor fruit can 3 T et claim 3 - our
care, will not the recollection of youth's golden hours, when gath-
176 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ering the firsl snowdrop of spring or the last aster of autumn,
touch as willi a vibrating chord that latent love for Nature which
few do nol possess, awaken aspirations for things beautiful, and
bring you into sympathy with the objects of our association?
"Welcome, then, to us be this Temple of Flora ! Here come
and bring your lovely flowers, gathered, it may be, fresh from
the dewy fields and pastures, or plucked in early morn in the culti-
vated border, the choicesl offerings of your tasteful care, arranged
in innumerable forms, and sparkling with colors of every hue.
From these walls may there ever irradiate that spirit of beauty
which .shall not only draw within your extending circle every lover
of nature or art, but whose glorious effulgence shall not be dimmed
until the whole world becomes a garden! "
Though this building is so familiar to the members
of the Society, it may be well to give some description of
it for those less acquainted with it, as well as for a
record in the future. The external style and appear-
ance are of a dignified and monumental character.
The front, on Tremont Street, which faces westerly, is
divided into three general divisions, the central division
being decorated with an order of coupled columns,
repeated in pilasters behind, and carried through the
three stories. — Doric in the lowest, Ionic in the second,
and Corinthian in the third story. A rich cornice
crowns the whole facade, surmounted by a central attic
as ;i pedestal for a statue of Ceres, cut in white granite.
The windows have semicircular arched heads; those in
the front being crowned with cornices, which in the
second story are supported by brackets, while those in
the third story have the spandrels enriched with carving.
The angles of the front arc decorated with projecting
piers cut with vermiculated quoins, and forming bases
at the top of the entrance story for two statues, — that of
Flora at the south-western, and that of Pomona at the
Horticultural Hall,
Tremont Gtreet.
KEPOET OF THE COMMITTEE ON STATUES. 177
north-western corner. It is believed that this is the
first instance in which statuary of a high order of excel-
lence has ever been placed in similar positions in this
country. The angles in the second and third stories
are supported by Doric pilasters, the faces of which are
cut in moulded panels. The facades on Bromfield
Street and Montgomery Place are similar in style to the
front, but much plainer, and are surmounted by a balus-
trade. The material is Concord white granite.
On the 4th of February, 1865, Turner Sargent, H.
Hollis Hunnewell, Charles O. Whitmore, and Benjamin
P. Cheney, were appointed a committee for the pur-
pose of receiving donations for procuring and placing
upon the centre crowning tablet, and on the north and
south buttresses of the first story of the Tremont Street
fagade, three statues respectively of Ceres, Pomona,
and Flora ; and the committee were authorized, when
the donations were sufficient to cover the cost of the
statues, to cause the same to be executed. At the
meeting of the Society on the 7th of July, 1866,
the chairman of the committee reported, that, by the
spontaneous and noble generosity of his associates, three
colossal statues, — one representing the Goddess of
Grain, one the Goddess of Fruits, and one the Goddess
of Flowers, modelled by Martin Milmore, — had been
executed in granite, and placed in their proper positions
upon the building.
The first or street story is divided into five stores,
two of which front on Tremont Street, and three on
Bromfield Street, two of the latter running through to
Montgomery Place, while in the rear of the third is a
staircase, which commences in the basement, and com-
municates with each story above, and with the loft, for
178 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
storage purposes. The divisions of the basement are
the same as those of this story, there being a cellar
under each store; but that under the eastern store is
occupied by the boiler for heating the building, and for
the storage of fuel.
The entrance to the part of the building occupied by
the Society is by a flight of marble steps ten feet in
width, carried up between the two stores on Tremont
Street, and leading into a spacious vestibule. Here, on
e perceived that less than half of these varieties
would now be thought worthy of a place in a prize col-
lection, and some have gone entirely out of cultivation.
FRUITS FROM FRANCE, 1851. 295
The crop of plums and peaches was very abundant,
and of superior quality. A dish of Early Crawfords,
from John P. dishing, were probably the finest peaches
ever placed on the Society's tables, measuring twelve or
thirteen inches in circumference. The display of vege-
tables was exceedingly fine.
The " Railroad Jubilee," to celebrate the completion
of the roads connecting Boston with Canada, was held
on the same days as the annual exhibition, and, by vote
of the Society, the distinguished strangers present in the
city were invited to the exhibition. At the annual
meeting on the 4th of October, several residents of Mon-
treal were chosen honorary members, who were doubt-
less introduced to the Society's rooms on this occasion.
On the 11th of October the Champlain Valley Hor-
ticultural Society exhibited a collection of twenty-eight
varieties of pears, and fifty-three apples, of which the
committee said, " This collection was one of much in-
terest, not only in affording proof of the successful
attempts to improve the horticulture of the valley of
Lake Champlain, but in furnishing an opportunity for
testing the fruits of that region, and thus better en-
abling a decision of the question of the adaptation of
particular varieties to general cultivation." Another
collection was exhibited on the 1st of November, from
Andre Leroy of Angers, France, consisting of one hun-
dred and sixteen varieties of pears, and thirty-six of
apples, besides crab apples, walnuts, chestnuts, etc.,
only a part of which, however (owing to the miscarriage
and detention of the package), arrived in good order.
This collection was of mudh interest, as enabling culti-
vators not only to settle doubts as to the correctness of
new varieties which had fruited here, but to learn the
296 .MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAX SOCIETY.
value of others without waiting for the trees to bear ;
and great satisfaction was felt that the introduction of
ocean steam navigation had rendered the interchange
of such collections possible. Among the pears was the
Doyenne du Cornice, now widely known as a variety of
superlative excellence.
One of the most useful services rendered by the Soci-
ety at this time was the work undertaken by the Fruit
Committee of formally testing new varieties of fruits as
presented from week to week, either from imported
trees or native seedlings, and carefully comparing them
with standard varieties ; minutes of their decisions being
made at the time. The report of the committee for
this year is fuller than any previous one, and gives the
names of about forty pears of foreign origin which had
been exhibited and tested for the first or second time ;
and this list was not complete, but embraced only those
which had particularly attracted the attention of the
committee. Among the forty we do not find one now
deemed " worthy of general cultivation." A large num-
ber of new native pears had also been examined as well
as of other fruits, large and small, native and foreign.
At this time the Early Virginia, llovey's Seedling, and
Jenney's Seedling strawberries, were thought, taking all
circumstances into consideration, probably the most
profitable, and best for general cultivation in this vicini-
ty. The Christiana melon, raised by Capt. Josiah Lovett
from a green Malta melon impregnated with a very
early variety, it was believed had not been equalled.
To mark their appreciation of its merits, and recom-
mend it to growers, the Society awarded Capt. Lovett a
piece of plate of the value of fifty dollars. Early the
next year, a similar special award was made to John M.
EXHIBITIONS IN 1852. 297
Ives, for the introduction of the Marrow squash, which,
as before recorded, was shown by him at the annual
exhibition of the Society in 1834.
For some reason now unknown, the Society saw fit, in
1852, to return to the practice, which had been discon-
tinued for two years, of charging an admission fee to
the weekly exhibitions. At the exhibition on the 10th
of January, Hovey & Co. exhibited fine specimens of
Bignonia venusta. May 22, the Dicentra (Dielytra) spec-
tabilis was shown by Winship & Co. for the first time.
In July, H. Schimming, gardener to John P. dishing,
exhibited fine plants of Clerodendron squamatum, C.
pedunculatum, C. fallax, Allamanda grandiflora, Justicia
carnea, Dipladenia splendens, with new alstrcemerias,
calceolarias, etc. Of new fruits, the Coe's Transparent
cherry was first shown June 26 by Azell Bowditch. The
Sheldon pear was also shown by Hovey & Co. for the
first time. November 13, Francis Dana exhibited sev-
eral of his new seedling pears, among which was No. 16,
now known as Dana's Hovey. The Beurre Clairgeau was
shown by Samuel C. Pitman and Jonathan Fowler, its
large size and rich color exciting much interest. Octo-
ber 2, Frederic Tudor exhibited upwards of twenty
varieties of pears of great perfection and beauty ; and
the whole show of that day was one of the finest ever
made in the Society's hall. During the autumn sev-
eral specimens of Duchesse d'Angouleme were shown
weighing twenty-four ounces each.
The increased number of exhibiters, and the great
variety of fruit, induced the Society this year to try the
experiment of holding the annual exhibition under a
pavilion, as had been done by the London Horticultural
Society in its exhibitions at Chiswick. The tent was
298 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
two hundred feet long by one hundred feet wide, and
was pitched in the Public Garden, then a much less at-
tractive place than now, and was fitted up with six rows
of tables, measuring in all more than one thousand feet in
length. The two tables against the sides w r erc devoted to
flowers and vegetables, and the other four to fruit. In
the centre was a stage filled with beautiful plants. The
sides of the pavilion were covered with evergreen trees,
and the poles supporting the centre were wreathed with
evergreens and flowers. The entrance was through an
arch decorated in the same way. The crop of apples
and pears was most abundant this year ; and the display
of these fruits, especially the pears, was magnificent.
Peaches, plums, and grapes were not so abundant,
partly owing to the late season of the exhibition, when
many of these fruits were past. The prizes for apples
and pears in 1845, 1846, and 1847, were for the largest
numbers of varieties, and the best grown ; but for the
next four years they were offered for the best collections
of twelve varieties. This year, however, there being
ample room for the display of large collections, prizes
were offered both for the largest collections and for
twelve select varieties, with the result that the total
number of dishes placed upon the tables exceeded three
thousand and four hundred, amounting to more than a
hundred bushels, about two-thirds of which were pears.
Marshall P. Wilder exhibited two hundred and sixty
varieties of pears; Ilovey & Co., two hundred and fifty
pears, besides apples, grapes, figs, etc. ; and Benjamin V.
French, one hundred and sixty pears, and one hundred
and eighty apples.
The display of plants was not very large; but many
of the specimens were very beautiful, the most promi-
REPORT ON GARDENS, 1852. 299
nent being a finely grown Nepenthes distillatoria, from
John P. dishing, which attracted much attention. The
exhibition of vegetables was large, and exceedingly fine
in quality — indeed, the best ever made, — the accommo-
dations for their display being better than ever before.
The prize for the best display and greatest variety was
awarded to the Hon. Daniel Webster.
The Fruit Committee, in their report, remarked that
" Delegations from the horticultural societies of several far dis-
tant States were present, with many individuals, both of this coun-
try and from Europe, who, from their high position in society, were
well qualified to give opinion of weight ; and never was a horticul-
tural exhibition in Boston examined by so numerous or so truly
respectable a concourse of visitors as that of 1852. Never were
more just or satisfactoiy expressions of interest and delight
elicited ; never a more true assertion universally made than that
it exceeded in numbers and varieties of fruit, as well as in beauty
and perfection, every former exhibition of the kind yet witnessed
by them in any part of the world."
The Committee on Gardens reported visits to the
greenhouse of Jonathan French in Roxbury, the green-
houses, stoves, and graperies of Hovey & Co. in Cam-
bridge, the fruit and vegetable garden of John Gordon
in Brighton, the garden and grounds of John P. dish-
ing at Watertown, and the fruit garden of Frederic
Tudor at Nahant. The last mentioned place was partic-
ularly commended by the committee as combining taste
in the buildings, beauty of situation, and extensive
views, with well arranged grounds, the most approved
mechanical appliances, and a large collection of the
choicest varieties of fruit trees. All the trees and
plants were flourishing, notwithstanding the naturally
adverse circumstances of the situation.
In his address on the 1st of January, 1853, President
300 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Cabot recommended to the Society to hold occasional
meetings for the discussion of subjects pertaining to
horticulture. The suggestion was referred to a commit-
tee, who reported favorably upon it; and accordingly an
informal meeting was held on Saturday the 15th of Jan-
uary, at half past nine a.m., at which the culture of the
pear was discussed. Four other meetings were held at
intervals of tw r o weeks ; the subjects being the advan-
tage of heading in newly planted trees, the importance
of mulching pear trees, and the value of wool waste as
a manure.
The opening exhibition of the season took place on
the 14th of May. The weather was fine, and the show
of plants in pots was unusually rich, varied, and beauti-
ful, — finer than any ever before seen at the May exhi-
bition. The summer was memorable for the exhibition,
by John Fisk Allen, of the Victoria regia, or great
water lily. On the 18th of June a leaf four feet in
diameter was shown, and on the 16th of July one
measuring five and a half feet. A flower was shown at
a special exhibition, on the afternoon and evening of
Thursday, August 4, to a crowd of admiring visitors.
The committee recommended a gratuity of fifty dollars
to Mr. Allen for the introduction and successful cultiva-
tion of this rare and wonderful plant. On the 6th of
August. Alvin Adams exhibited, besides other Califor-
nia productions, bark and foliage from the gigantic
redwood trees of California (Sequoia gigantea). The
botanical relations of this tree were not then deter-
mined, and it was described as " the mammoth arbor-
vita 1 tree, said to be about three hundred feet high."
\\ c have spoken of the interesting exhibitions of
native plants in 1839, the result of the special prizes
EXHIBITIONS IX 1853. 801
offered by Thomas Lee. After that time the interest in
this class of plants declined ; but on the 3d of Septem-
ber of this year, Dennis Murray presented a hundred
species of native plants, and fourteen of fungi, all care-
fully labelled with their scientific names. Mr. Murray
continued these contributions to the close of his life,
in 1864, he having been attacked while arranging his
flowers in the stand for the annual exhibition, by an ill-
ness which caused his death in a few days. Since then,
this department has been well sustained by many zeal-
ous collectors and cultivators.
The crop of peaches this year was unusually large,
and of excellent quality, and on the 3d of September
a remarkably fine exhibition of this fruit was made by
a large number of contributors : indeed, the whole show
was one of the best ever made in the hall, and the same
may be said of the show a week later.
The twenty-fifth annual exhibition was held in a
pavilion on Boston Common, near West Street, com-
mencing on the 20th of September, and continuing four
days. The pavilion was the same as that used the year
previous ; but the whole space was floored over, making
it much more comfortable. The roof was decorated
with various colored flags and banners, giving a gay
effect to the whole ; and a platform in the centre, sur-
rounded with plants, was occupied by a band of music.
The tent was brilliantly lighted with gas during the
evening, when it presented a most beautiful appearance.
Soon after the commencement of the exhibition, it was
visited by a severe rain storm, which penetrated the
canvas, and gave the fruits and flowers a thorough
drenching. The weather for the remainder of the time
was remarkably pleasant ; and crowds of people visited
302 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
the pavilion, the number being upwards of eight thou-
sand, besides the members of the Society and invited
guests. Pecuniarily the exhibition was one of the most
profitable ever held by the Society.
Although the fruit was so fine in 1852, it was even
exceeded this year as regards pears, both in quantity
and quality. Larger collections of this fruit were
shown than ever before ; that of Marshall P. Wilder
comprising three hundred and ten varieties, and that of
Hovey & Co., three hundred. These numbers were not
again reached for several years. The Beurre Diels and
Flemish Beauties were eleven to twelve inches in circum-
ference, and the Beurre d'Anjous and White Doyennes
ten inches. Marshall P. Wilder exhibited the Beurre
Superfin pear for the first time. E. W. Bull exhibited
his new seedling grape, which, under the name of Con-
cord, is now so generally cultivated throughout the coun-
try. The apples were quite ordinary, this not being the
bearing year ; but the grapes were much finer than the
previous year. Many new contributors came in, carry-
ing off the prizes from those who had received them
for years.
The display of plants was very beautiful, and embraced
some exceedingly fine specimens. The show of vegeta-
bles was good, and attracted much attention.
The Committee on Flowers and Vegetables, following
the example of the Fruit Committee, this year added to
their list of awards a few interesting remarks on the
most important objects exhibited, and the Committee of
Arrangements made a formal report for the first time.
The first award of a prospective prize was made this
year to Hovey & Co., for their seedling cherry, the
llovcy, which had been exhibited for five years. The
EXHIBITIONS IN" 1854. 303
crop of plums, which was exceedingly abundant in
1852, was reported by the committee to be an almost
entire failure this year. This was the beginning of that
scarcity of plums, which, owing to the destruction of the
trees by the black knot, has continued to the present
day.
The Garden Committee visited the grapehouse of M.
H. Simpson at Saxonville ; the garden of Benjamin V.
French at Braintree, where they found a great variety
of strawberries under experimental cultivation ; the
grounds of John D. Bates at Swampscott, the nurse-
ries of Winship & Co. at Brighton, those of Hovey &
Co. at Cambridge, and the extensive graperies of W.
C. Strong at Brighton ; for all of which premiums were
awarded.
The spring of 1854 was cold and backward, and the
drought in the months of July and August extremely
severe, producing an unfavorable effect upon the exhi-
bitions through the season. The display at the opening
exhibition was quite meagre ; and the only object worthy
of note here was a fine specimen of Cattleya Mossise,
in flower, from John Fisk Allen. July 22, Ignatius
Sargent exhibited bunches of Black Hamburg grapes,
several of which weighed upwards of four pounds each,
and the largest, seven and one half pounds. This was
probably the largest bunch of this variety ever shown
at any exhibition of the Society. September 9, John
Fisk Allen presented specimens of the Allen's Hybrid
grape, the first cross between the native and foreign
species, the Rogers hybrids having first fruited in 1856.
The arrangements for the annual exhibition, which
opened on the 12th of September, and continued through
the 16th, were similar to those of the preceding year;
304 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and. notwithstanding the severe drought, it was one of
the most successful ever made by the Society. The
fruits from the largest contributors were not only as
large, but equally as fair, as at any former exhibition ;
while the smaller collections showed that an increased
attention to the cultivation of fruit had been given by
the newly enlisted members. The variety of pears was
not so great as the previous year ; the largest collection
consisting of two hundred and seventy-three varieties
from Marshall P. Wilder. The apples were exceedingly
fine, and the quantity was large, Benjamin V. French
showing one hundred and fifty kinds. The grapes were
remarkably good, comprising some superb clusters of
the Syrian, from Mrs. F. B. Durfee, weighing about six
pounds each. The Concord was shown in great perfec-
tion. A large number of other native grapes, of every
grade of quality, was exhibited ; and we may date from
this time the general interest in the improvement of the
native grape, which has already resulted in adding many
valuable kinds to our catalogues.
There was a grand display of pot plants, among
them being a very finely grown specimen, the first in-
troduced here, of the beautiful Cissus discolor, from
Marshall P. Wilder. This was the harbinger of the
infinite variety of Caladiums, Crotons, Dracaenas, Maran-
tas, Agaves, and other ornamental leaved plants now
so generally cultivated and admired. 1 The show of
vegetables exceeded the expectations of the committee,
the quantity being abundant and the quality excellent.
Much interest was added to this occasion by the meet-
1 It should in>t be understood that ornamental foliaged plants were
unknown before this time, for the Maranta zebrina was exhibited in 1831,
but that the Cissus heralded the introduction of these plants in such num-
bers as to form a Beparate class.
AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1854. 305
ing, on the 13th, 14th, and 15th of September, of the
American Pomological Society, for which accommoda-
tions were provided in the hall of the Society, while a
place was set apart in the pavilion on the Common for
the fruits brought by the members. These were not as
numerous as was expected, showing that all parts of
the country had suffered from the prevailing drought.
They were mostly from New York and Pennsylvania ;
the largest collection consisting of one hundred and
ninety-five varieties of pears, and forty of plums, from
Ellwanger & Barry of Rochester, N.Y. The impression
which the exhibition of the Society as a whole made
on the delegates may be gathered from the words of P.
Barry of Rochester, in the convention: "I have visited
a great many exhibitions of the kind, both in this coun-
try and in Europe; but in tastefulness of arrangement,
in interest and instruction, this surpasses all I have ever
seen. The display of fruits on the tables has hardly
been equalled in the world."
Owing to the extreme drought, few places were vis-
ited by the Committee on Gardens, and such as were
examined appeared more or less to disadvantage ; yet
they reported that they could not well overrate the high
state of cultivation and general fine appearance of the
grounds of Nahum Stetson of Bridgewater. They vis-
ited also the grounds of T. P. Chandler of Brookline,
the fruit garden of William R. Austin at Dorchester,
and the garden of Parker Barnes in the same town.
Premiums or gratuities were awarded for all these
places.
Two of the prospective prizes for new productions
were awarded this year, — the Society's gold medal to
Ilovey & Co., for their seedling camellia, C. M. Hovey,
30G MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and the same to Martin Davis, for the Davis's Seedling
potato.
The exhibitions of 1855 showed an increased interest
in every department. A new camellia, — now called
Mrs. Anne Marie Ilovey, — producing pink, white, and
variegated flowers on the same plant, was shown by
Ilovey & Co. for the first time. June 19, John B.
Moore exhibited twelve stalks of Victoria rhubarb,
weighing twenty-four and a half pounds, the largest
stalk weighing two pounds and seven ounces. July 7,
M. H. Simpson presented specimens of grapes grown
on vines from which crops had been taken in March,
1854, and again in December of the same year. C. F.
Jones exhibited several orchids in fine bloom, including
Dendrobium moschatum, and Stanhopca tigrina. Some
of the displays of roses and other cut flowers were re-
markably fine, being limited in extent only by the size
of the hall. The seedling and other phloxes from
Joseph Brcck, Ilovey & Co., and Parker Barnes, and
seedling petunias from E. S. Rand, jun., were particu-
larly noted. On the 1st of September eleven cultivators
offered collections of asters for premium, the whole form-
ing the finest display of this flower ever made in the
hall. At the same time J. F. Allen exhibited Nelum-
bium speciosum (the lotus of the Nile and the sacred
bean of India), Nclumbium lutcum of the Southern
States, and Nymphcea ccerulca, grown in the tank with
the Victoria rcgia. The Myrsiphyllum asparagoides,
now so popular for decorative purposes under the name
of " smilax," was exhibited by Herman Grundcl, gar-
dener to Ilovey & Co.
The interest in the improvement of the native grape
continued. Specimens of the Delaware were sent to
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1855. 307
the Society for the first time by A. Thompson of Dela-
ware, O. The Fruit Committee remarked the increased
care bestowed on the cultivation of the pear, and ex-
pressed the belief that this fruit succeeded as well or
better in the vicinity of Boston than in almost any other
part of our country, — a belief which the experience of
later years has confirmed.
Though the experiment of holding the annual exhi-
bition in a tent had proved pleasant and successful in
many respects, it was felt to be hazardous in our
changeable climate ; and, on the completion of the new
Music Hall, its large size and central situation com-
mended it as the most desirable place for the annual
exhibition, which was accordingly held there from the
18th to the 21st of September. An arch was con-
structed over the main entrance, leading from Winter
Street, and tastefully decorated with streamers, flags,
and flowers. The main body of the hall was occupied
by five tables for fruit, each seventy feet long and five
feet wide. Under the side balconies were stands for
flowers ; and the space under the north gallery was
devoted to vegetables. The pot plants and designs were
arranged on the stage ; and the whole, when viewed
from the balconies, presented a beautiful panorama of
the productions of Pomona and Flora.
The display of fruits was superior to any former one,
owing mainly to the very small number of inferior
specimens. The flowers were superior, the dahlias
especially surpassing those exhibited for the past four
years ; and the display of pot plants was large and fine.
Prizes were offered for floral designs, which added much
to the appearance of the hall. They were much smaller
than those exhibited in 1845 and 1846;, but the com-
308 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
mittco remarked that many of them could have been
improved had Dame Nature been consulted oftener by
the artists during their construction.
The variety and excellence of the vegetables exceeded
that of any former exhibition. A very remarkable con-
tribution in this department was a collection of thirty-
two varieties of squashes from Rev. A. R. Pope, which ,
he had kept from mixture by carefully covering the
blossoms, and fertilizing them by hand. The only places
reported on by the Garden Committee were those of
Joseph Breck at Brighton, whose collection of hardy
herbaceous plants was particularly noted, and who re-
ceived the prize for the best flower garden ; and of Dr.
Nathan Durfce at Fall River, who received the prize
for the best fruit garden.
The exhibition at the opening of the hall on the 1 7th
of May, 1856, was marked by a display of numerous
and finely grown pot plants. W. C. Strong exhibited
twenty-eight pots of fuchsias, and cut specimens mak-
ing up forty varieties, which are described as truly
magnificent, and forming such a display of this beau-
tiful flower as had been rarely seen. Edward S. Rand,
jun., exhibited Clematis lanuginosa, now known as a
parent of C. Jackmanni and other beautiful varieties,
but which had never been seen here before, and was
spoken of as by far the most showy of the tribe. On
the 21st of June, the prize day for roses, owing to the
lateness of the season the display was not great; but
the prconics were just in perfection, and the exhibition
was by far the finest ever seen in the room. A week
later, a splendid exhibition of roses and other flowers
was made from upwards of thirty contributors. July 5,
II. II. Ilunncwcll sent a dozen beautiful specimens of
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1856. 309
the Stanwick nectarine, which proved superior to any
other variety the committee had ever tasted. Septem-
ber 3 was prize day for asters ; and the display was
superior even to that of the preceding year, there
being nearly twenty contributors. October 4, Isaac Fay
showed twelve Seckel pears weighing fifty-one and a
quarter ounces ; and Samuel Kemp, an equal number
weighing fifty ounces. The exhibition of pears on that
day as a whole was unsurpassed at any weekly show,
nearly every contribution being well grown, and of extra
size.
The annual exhibition was again held in the Music
Hall, and, though superior in many respects, was not,
as a whole, equal to some former exhibitions. The
general arrangement of the hall was the same as the
year previous ; but a greater profusion of evergreens
and flowers was used in decoration. The ceiling was
festooned with streamers of various colors, and the col-
umns were prettily wreathed. On the railings of the
balconies were the names of prominent botanists, hor-
ticulturists, pomologists, and benefactors of the Society.
The display of pot plants, though not large, was an
improvement on that of the preceding year, and that of
cut flowers was uncommonly good. Many floral designs
were exhibited ; and, besides the successful competitors
for the six prizes, twelve persons received gratuities for
bouquets.
The display of pears, which included many new va-
rieties, was, as usual, large and fine, as was also that of
apples ; while that of grapes was limited. Prizes were*
offered this year for the best display of vegetables ; yet
the show was not equal to that of some former years,
many of the liberal and extensive contributors being
310 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
more or less engaged in carrying out the arrangements
for the inauguration of the Franklin statue. J. Hyde
& Son offered a collection of sixty-seven varieties of
potatoes, explaining on the cards their relative value
fcr culture. Several persons exhibited the Dioscorca
Batatas (Chinese yam) and the Holcus saccharatus
(Chinese sugar-cane), of which sanguine hopes were
entertained that they would become valuable agricultu-
ral products, — the former as supplementing the potato,
and the latter as supplying sugar or syrup.
The reports of the various committees continued to
increase in fulness and interest. The Committee on
Gardens gave a detailed account of the various places
visited by them, the first being that of M. H. Simpson
at Saxonvillc, where they examined his experiments in
growing three crops of grapes in two years. The next
was to the flower garden of Joseph S. Cabot, president
of the Society, at Salem, to whom they awarded the
first prize ; here also they visited the graperies and lily
house of John Fisk Allen. The next trip was to the gar-
den of Mrs. F. B. Durfee at Fall River, who received
the premium for the best graperies, and whose gardener,
Mr. Young, received a gratuity for the fine condition
of the lawns and grass plats. . Charles Copcland's pleas-
ure grounds at Wyoming were next examined, and
received the highest award. Two of the oldest and most
famed seats in Massachusetts, the Gov. Gore estate in
Waltham, afterwards owned by Theodore Lyman, and,
at the time of. this visit, by T. W. Walker, and Oakley
Place, the estate of George W. Pratt in Watcrtown,
next received the attention of the committee. To Mr.
Walker was awarded the premium for the best vegeta-
ble garden, and the second prize for a flower garden.
REPORTS OF GARDEN AND FLOWER COMMITTEES, 1856. 311
Mr. Pratt's grapery and flower department were par-
ticularly commended, and a gratuity was awarded for
them. The last visit was to the grounds and nurseries
of Hovey & Co. at Cambridge, who received a gratuity
for their fine pears and strawberries and splendid bed
of Japan lilies. The report concluded thus : —
''The committee cannot close this report without expressing
their high approval of this portion of the Society's labors. A
spur and new life have been given to horticulture, and a laudable
ambition and emulation encouraged. The rich specimens of fruit
which adorn our tables, and compete for the prizes, are now, in
most instances, but fair and true representatives of the gardens
from which they come, and need not be ashamed of the places
where they grew. We are happy to believe that the pleasure and
satisfaction of these visits have been mutual. Few persons are
without the desire for praise or approval, which it is always a sat-
isfaction to receive from those considered best competent to judge,
and having official position. The awarding of liberal premiums,
and a careful inspection, when invited, of the numerous and in-
creasing gardens dotted over this Commonwealth, may be justly
considered a good substitute for an experimental garden (one of
the early objects of this Societ}*), and perhaps is the best method
of expending our funds for the promotion of horticulture and im-
proved gardening."
The Flower Committee reported, that, " from the time
of the opening of the hall to the annual exhibition, no
weekly display has failed to be such as not only to
attract and gratify visitors, but also to reflect credit
upon contributors and the Society. From season to
season the marks of improvement are visible ; and the
production of seedlings, and the introduction of new
plants, give evidence of a constantly growing and con-
tinued progress on the part of cultivators." Special
commendation was given to the seedling Japan lilies
shown. The displays of roses, asters, phloxes, and dah-
312 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
lias, had also been fine. The change which a few years
had wrought in some of these flowers was both striking
and gratifying, and its extent might be in some degree
appreciated by contrasting the prize asters of only half
a decade since with the perfect and very beautiful
specimens that this season filled the prize stands of the
Society. Yet the committee regretted that no incon-
siderable portion of this progress was due to the skill
of foreign cultivators, and expressed the hope that
liberal encouragement would be given by the Society
to the production by our florists of new seedling flowers.
The Committee on Vegetables also reported increased
interest in every thing relating to that department.
In fruits the committee mentioned the Washington
Strawberry apple and the Rebecca grape, as new and
promising introductions. The prospective prize of
the Lyman plate was awarded to Isaac Fay for the best
seedling strawberry, — the Jenny Lind. A very large
number of new European strawberries was exhibited by
Ilovcy & Co., among which the Admiral Dundas was
remarkable for its size, eighteen weighing a pound ;
while the Sir Harry received the first prize as being
superior in flavor to any other variety of the season.
The winter of 1856 and 1857 was of unusual severity,
causing much injury to fruit trees ; and the spring was
cold and backward, the fruit crop being much lessened
by the unpropitious weather during the time of setting.
The season was also unfavorable for floriculture, and
tlie weekly shows consequently disappointed the hopes
of cultivators. But, in spite of all discouragements, the
displays were most gratifying in the growth of specimen
plants and in the new and improved varieties of flow-
ers. The shows were kept up as usual in the library
NEW FLOWERS AND FEUITS, 1857. 313
room previous to the opening of the hall ; and we note
the exhibition on the 2d of May, by T. G. Whytal, of
the pretty Deutzia gracilis, which, though introduced
three or four years earlier, was not reported as exhib-
ited before. At the opening of the hall on the 16th
of May, a collection of eight fuchsias from H. H. Ilun-
newell were by far the finest ever exhibited ; some of
the plants being over five feet high, and perfect masses
of bloom. Joseph Breck & Co. and Hovey & Co.
continued to introduce and originate new phloxes, each
exhibiting a hundred or more kinds at once. The Ver-
saillaise currant was first shown July 18 by W. C.
Strong. The Lawton blackberry was exhibited and care-
fully tested in comparison with the Dorchester (as the
Improved High Bush was now called), the opinion being
unanimously in favor of the latter. At the exhibition
of September 5, the main attraction was a dish of
Shanghai peaches, from N. Stetson, raised from a stone
received from Shanghai. The peaches weighed twelve
ounces each, and measured eleven inches in circum-
ference. Although the plum crop generally was a
failure, Henry Vandine exhibited, on the 12th of Sep-
tember, a collection of twenty varieties. October 31,
about a hundred varieties of apples and pears were
exhibited from Dr. Pfeiffer of Bremen.
The annual exhibition was again held in Music Hall,
from the 23d to the 25th of September. The general
arrangements of the hall were similar to those of pre-
vious years ; but, agreeably to the recommendation of
the last committee, all decorations around the walls were
dispensed with, the hall being deemed sufficiently beau-
tiful in itself; and the interest of the exhibition was
allowed to depend wholly on the merits of the produc-
314 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
tions exhibited. A very handsome arch was, however,
erected across "Winter Street, at the main entrance.
The display of plants and flowers was, as a whole,
better than usual, and there was also an improvement
in the designs. Some Wardian cases, filled with plants
in fine condition, were exhibited by II. A. Gracf &
Son of New York, and were much admired. They
were the first ever seen here. The apples and pears
were not as good as in former years ; but the foreign
grapes were excellent. The display of vegetables formed
one of the most pleasing features of the exhibition,
the variety being great, and the quality equal, if not
superior, to that of former years. The squash was
most richly represented.
This exhibition was marked by the revival of a cus-
tom which had been discontinued for twenty years, —
the delivery of an address at the anniversary on some
subject connected with horticulture. This was on the
last evening of the exhibition, the fruits, flowers, and
vegetables remaining in the places which they had occu-
pied through the week, and the audience filling the bal-
conies and the spaces between the tables. The speaker
was Rev. Henry Ward Beecher, who was introduced
by President Cabot as not only an eloquent preacher
and orator, but as personally devoted to horticulture.
It is impossible here to do justice to Mr. Beechcr's
address, and we can only say that it was in his happiest
manner, and that the numerous assembly were not
disappointed.
The report of the Garden Committee for the year is
of unusual interest. They again visited the hothouses
of M. II. Simpson at Saxonville, and examined the
beautiful specimens of rare plants, and his novel experi-
GARDENS, FRUITS, AND VEGETABLES, 1857. 315
merit in grape culture. Among other places visited
later in the season were the estate of II. II. Ilunne-
well at West Needham, now known as the most beau-
tiful in New England, but which six years previously
to the time of which we write was a pitch pine forest
with a barren soil ; the trees and grounds of Woodlawn
Cemetery in Maiden ; the grounds of William Whiting
in Roxbury, the flower garden and fruit houses of
C. S. Holbrook in East Randolph, the flower garden
of William Wales in Dorchester, the pear orchard of
John Gordon in Brighton, and the smaller fruit garden
of Ariel Low in Roxbury. Premiums or gratuities
were awarded for all these places. The Fruit Committee
noted as a circumstance showing how complete was the
failure of the apple crop, and which had not occurred
before since the formation of the Society, that, on the
prize day for winter apples, not a single dish was pre-
sented. The Vegetable Committee commended the
quality of the Hubbard squash, then just introduced to
notice by James J. H. Gregory.
Several measures were adopted by the Society during
the year 1858, which, though not immediately connected
with the exhibitions, had an important bearing on the
progress of horticulture. The first of these was the
appointment of a committee, of which J. W. P. Jenks,
, professor of entomology, was a member, to investigate
the habits of the robin, and the benefits or injuries
caused by it to horticulture. A motion had been intro-
duced to petition the Legislature for a repeal of the
statutes prohibiting the destruction of this bird ; but, it
appearing that no one possessed any definite and accu-
rate information as to its food, Professor Jenks under-
took an investigation of the subject, which resulted in
316 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ascertaining many interesting faets concerning the food
of the robin. His reports were published in the Trans-
actions of the Society, and gave strong evidence that
the general impression that this bird is far more benefi-
cial than injurious to the gardener is correct. Later in
the year, the Society joined with the Natural History
Society in a petition to the Legislature for the pub-
lication, at the expense of the State, of a new edition
of Dr. Harris's work on Insects Injurious to Vegetation.
The Society also appointed, a committee to take
into consideration the distribution of seeds from the
I'ii tent Office at Washington. A full report on this
subject — from the pen of John Lewis llussell, professor
of botany, and a member of the committee — may be
found in the Transactions for 1858. Professor Russell's
conclusion was, that, with few exceptions, the seeds dis-
tributed from the Patent Office were valueless for culti-
vation in this State ; and that, " when we consider the
unusual facilities enjoyed by our New England cities,
especially those of Massachusetts, for the early introduc-
tion of every valuable seed, whether of field or of garden
culture, the zeal and enterprise manifested towards our
gardens and fields provokes a smile at the ignorance of
the friends of agriculture in the want of a considerate
regard for our needs or possible necessities in this line
of individual or social industry."
Early in 1858 the Society voted to dispense with the
regular weekly shows, and to substitute monthly exhibi-
tions, at which a fee should be charged for admission.
It was thought that this course might be of advantage,
by giving better and fuller displays of both flowers and
fruit. It was, however, found to be attended by one
disadvantage : the perfection of certain flowers and
FLOWERS AND FRUITS, 1858. 317
fruits either had not arrived, or had passed, on the day
fixed for the award of prizes. The reports of the season
show that many interesting exhibitions were made on
the Saturdays intervening between the monthly shows,
as well as before the opening of the hall. This oc-
curred on the 15th of May, and was unexpectedly fine ;
the specimen plants of azaleas, fuchsias, cissus, etc.,
being more numerous and better grown than ever
before. Attention was awakened to the rhododendron ;
and on the 12th of June IT. H. Hunnewcll made the
first of those beautiful displays which he has continued
every year until the present time. But the great
feature of the season was the rose show, on the 25th
and 26th of June, when every part of the hall was
occupied by stands or bouquets of roses, both of the
choicer and more common varieties ; and, both days
being fine, the hall was thronged with visitors. The
Gloire de Dijon rose bloomed profusely with several
amateurs, and was pronounced the best Tea rose.
Hollyhocks were very fine, and bid fair to become a
popular flower. September 4, Hovey & Co. showed
one hundred and twenty-five varieties of verbenas. Lili-
putian dahlias from M. Trautman were thought worthy
of special mention. A very fine display of fruit was
made on the 21st of August, including twenty-five varie-
ties of summer pears from Hovey & Co., besides foreign
grapes, blackberries, apples, and plums. October 16,
there was a dish of very remarkable Beurre Dicl pears,
from J. Gooding, the largest measuring sixteen and one
half inches in circumference, and weighing twenty-two
ounces.
The annual exhibition was this year confined to the
Society's hall, this course having probably been adopted
818 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
in consequence of the heavy draft on the treasury,
caused by the exhibition of 1857. All designs were
excluded, and the number of pot plants was necessarily
limited ; but we notice the first indications of the taste
for ferns and lycopods, the beautiful forms of which are
now found in every greenhouse. The prize collections
of apples and pears were reduced from thirty (which
had been the number for the last four years) to ten
varieties ; and all specimens other than those offered
for competition were excluded, except a limited number
of such as were new or rare. Consequently, almost all
those exhibited were extremely large and handsome,
and together made a magnificent display. The vegeta-
bles were exhibited in the store under the hall, as in
1850 and 1851. The most interesting feature was a
collection of sixty varieties of beans, from various parts
of the United States and Europe, especially France,
cultivated by M. & F. Burr, for the purpose of deter-
mining their relative value, as well as their synonymes,
and all neatly exhibited, and correctly labelled.
No entries were made this year in competition for
the prizes for gardens, etc. ; but the committee visited
several places, the first of which was that of John D.
Bates in Swampscott, which they found had improved
with surprising rapidity since their visit in 1853. A
gratuity was awarded to Mr. Bates for the excellent
taste and the neatness everywhere displayed, and the
thrifty growth and beauty of his ornamental trees, espe-
cially the pines. The Norway maples and Scotch pines
were noticed as particularly adapted to sea-shore cultiva-
tion. Gratuities were also awarded to William Bacon
of Roxbury for his pear garden, which he had reclaimed
from a salt marsh, and to Samuel Walker of Roxbury,
EXHIBITIONS IN 1859. 319
for the neatness and successful cultivation of his nurs-
ery of pear trees.
The weather during the growing season of 1859 was
extremely variable, and every month in the year was
marked by frost. The effect of weather so unfavorable
to vegetation could not fail to be noticed in the weekly
shows of the Society. The absence of hot days, and
the injury by high winds, added to the frequent frosts,
made the season the most unpropitious to fruit growers
since the formation of the Society. Plants cultivated
in greenhouses are, however, exempt from such unfa-
vorable influences ; and an unusually fine display of
these was made on the 19th of February, consisting of
Ericas, Epacris, Azaleas, Polyanthus, Cypripedium in-
signe, etc. The opening exhibition continued for two
days, and a finer display of pot plants had never been
made in the hall : the chief difficulty was to find space
for all the contributions. Many new and rare things
were shown, besides superb specimens of the old favorites.
Dennis Murray exhibited a very interesting collection of
two hundred and fifty-six dried specimens of Lichens,
all carefully named. At the rose show, June 23, 24,
and 25, although the weather was rainy and cold, and
the roses were not in so forward a condition as was
expected, the display was very good, particularly of
Hybrid Pcrpetuals, which were better than ever before.
The Wilson's Albany strawberry was exhibited ; and the
committee said of it, that " those shown were very large
berries, of a conical shape, dark colored, and very acid,
and did not, on trial, commend themselves for their
quality." July 16, W. C. Strong presented a collection
of eighteen varieties of gloxinias, which received higher
praise than any shown before. On the 20th of August
320 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
the hall was filled with a remarkably beautiful collec-
tion of flowers, Hovey & Co. contributing one hundred
and thirty varieties of annuals, among which were many
new and rare kinds. James Nugent exhibited black-
berries of remarkable size, twenty-five weighing six and
one-eighth ounces. September 10, W. C. Strong ex-
hibited the first specimens of that very striking and now
well known flower, Tritoma Uvaria. Plums were ex-
hibited in much greater quantity, and of much better
quality, than for several years.
At the annual exhibition, which was held on the 20th,
21st, 22d, and 23d of September, the Society returned
to the Music Hall, where the arrangements were very
similar to those of former years. The plants in pots
were the leading feature of the exhibition. The prin-
cipal display in this department was made by Hovey &
Co., and the variegated leaved plants in their collection
attracted much attention. As this was the first extensive
collection of these plants that had been exhibited, a list
of the names is given here for comparison with those of
the present day, — Agapanthus variegatus. Begonia Rex,
B. splendida argentea, Caladium atropurpureum, C. pic-
tuin. Cissus discolor, Coleus Blumei, Croton pictum, C.
variegatum, DiefFenbachia maculata, Dracaena tcrmina-
lis, Farfugium grande, Hydrangea Japonica varicgata,
Ropala elegans, R. Skinneri. and Vinca major varicgata.
The same gentlemen also exhibited the first of those
collections of ornamental coniferous trees, which in
later years have added great interest to the exhibitions.
There were sixteen species and varieties including Cu-
pressus Lawsoniana, Thujopsia borcalis, and Thuja
Hoveyii. Owing to early frosts in many gardens, the
number of contributors of cut flowers was small.
FRUITS AND GARDENS, 1S59. 321
High winds and a severe storm a short time before
the exhibition greatly injured the fruit ; yet the pears
were very fine, the apples excellent, and the grapes
superior to those of any exhibition for some years. The
success of this department equalled the expectations of
the most sanguine, and fully justified the attempt at so
extensive an exhibition, which by some was deemed a
hazardous experiment. The prizes for apples and pears
were offered for collections of twenty, fifteen, ten, and
five varieties, and so remained until 1876. The vegeta-
bles were more select and of finer quality than at any
previous exhibition. Unfortunately the weather was
stormy during the entire week of the show, preventing
that attendance of the public which the exhibitions of
the Society usually commanded, and it was much regret-
ted that so fine a show should not have been witnessed
by a larger number of persons.
The Fruit Committee in their report mentioned the
gradual introduction of orchard house culture.
The awards by the Garden Committee this year were
to Edward S. Rand of Dedham, for the best kept and
neatest grounds, and for special skill in the department
of flowers and ornamental gardening ; to Woodlawn
Cemetery at Chelsea, for good taste, neatness, and skill
in every department ; and to Mrs. Franklin B. Fay of
Chelsea, for good taste, industry, and economy in the
cultivation of flowers.
The year 1860 was as favorable to the pursuits of
the horticulturist as 1859 was unpropitious. The crop
of fruit of all kinds, except out door grapes, was un-
usually large, and of very fine quality. The transition
from the Society's hall in School Street had an unfavor-
able effect in some of the earlier shows ; but at the open-
322 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ing exhibition in the new rooms at Amory Hall from
the 23d to the 26th of May, in the words of the Flower
Committee, " Never had we had a finer display of choice
greenhouse plants, and never had the plants been more
tastefully arranged. The new variegated plants were
conspicuous and very numerous in all of the prize col-
lections." By far the finest display and greatest variety
was shown by William T. Merrifield of Worcester. His
collection consisted almost entirely of variegated leaved
plants and Lycopodiums.
The display of fruit and vegetables, though small, was
of very good quality. At the rose show, on the 25th
and '26th of June, the Hybrid Perpetuals showed the re-
sults of increased attention ; but the display as a whole,
though very good, was not equal to that of the previ-
ous year. The finest Hybrid Perpetuals shown were
Gen. Jacqueminot, Lord Raglan, Auguste Mie, Sydonie,
Cardinal Patrizzi, Etendard de Marengo, Lrclia, Jules
Margottin, Lion des Combats, Portland Blanc, and Tri-
omphc de Paris.
On the 30th of June, Hovey & Co. exhibited La
Constante strawberry, and Oliver Bennet fifty specimens
of the Crawford's Late peach, which had never been
surpassed, some of them measuring a foot in circum-
ference, and all beautiful and high flavored. On the
4th of August the display of fruit was one of the best
ever made so early in the season ; the apples being
especially handsome, and the Red Astrachan, Early
Harvest, Large Yellow Bough, and Williams, being
shown in quantities. Two weeks later the display of
cut flowers was exceedingly fine, embracing many new
and beautiful acquisitions, especially among the phloxes,
gladioli, and petunias. On the 1st of September both
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1860. 323
fruits and flowers were exceedingly fine, particularly the
asters.
The thirty-second annual exhibition, on the 18th to
the 21st of September, was held in the Music Hall, and
was one of the most beautiful as well as most successful
which the Society ever made. The hall was crowded
with a throng of visitors the entire four days. The
arrangement was somewhat different from that of pre-
vious years : the centre one of the five long tables being
exchanged for a platform only a foot high, on which the
collections of plants were placed ; and this platform was
intersected in the centre by a beautiful fountain. On
the stage, where previously the plants were arranged,
stands were erected for cut flowers, which were com-
pletely filled ; and in front of these the rare specimen
plants were placed. From this position the effect was
magnificent, — the silvery plumes of the pampas grass
towering up from among the plants, and on either side
the caladiums, begonias, and other elegant variegated
plants, forming a combination of silver, emerald, bronze,
and gold, entirely novel in a horticultural exhibition.
Among the most prominent plants were the Pteris
argyraea and P. tricolor, Cyanophyllum magnificum,
C. Assamicum and Gynerium argenteum, from Hovey &
Co., Maranta zebrina, from G. G. Hubbard, and Maran-
ta fasciata, from Evers & Comley. None of those
monstrosities called floral designs were shown ; but in-
stead, there were "a number of neat pretty little bas-
kets, showing into what dainty contrasts flowers could
be arranged, and what pretty effects could be produced
by skilful fingers."
The display of fruit was, without any doubt, the finest
ever made by the Society up to that time. There were
324 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
in all nearly two thousand dishes of apples, pears, plums.
peaches, and grapes, containing upwards of twenty thou-
sand specimens. The pears were truly remarkable. A
silver cup of the value of twenty-five dollars was offered
by II. B. Stanwood & Co. as a prize for the best twelve
specimens of the Bartlett pear ; and for this prize there
wire fifty-five competitors, Alexander Dickinson being
successful. The twelve specimens presented by him
weighed eight and one-half pounds. Marshall P.
Wilder and Iiovcy & Co. each exhibited three hundred
varieties of pears, — a larger number than has been
shown at any exhibition of the Society since.
The display of vegetables was magnificent, the varie-
ties being many, and the specimens grown in perfection.
The Pomo Lesteriano, or Perfected tomato, was shown,
of handsome appearance, and very solid.
For the first time, fixed prizes had been offered for
pot plants and cut flowers at each weekly exhibition ; so
that the hall always presented an appearance creditable
alike to the Society and the exliibiters. In their review
of the season the Flower Committee mentioned a great
number of new and rare plants exhibited at the weekly
and annual exhibitions. Among those most prominent
were the Caladium Chantini and Gymnogrammc chry-
sophylla of William T. Merrifield ; Thyrsacanthus ruti-
lans, Maranta regalis, and a variety of Begonias from
Evera & Comlcy; Statice Holfordi, and Lilium Browni,
from Iiovcy & Co. ; Dianthus Hcddewigi, from Martin
Trautman; and Peristcria elata, from William Wheel-
wright. The cut flowers were unusually fine. The
dahlia, which had been so popular, seemed to be going
slowly out of favor.
Among the varieties mentioned for the first time by
THE SEASON OF 1861. 325
the Fruit Committee are the Clapp's Favorite pear, which
they speak of as " truly one of the most promising
varieties that had come before them," and the Mount
Vernon, orginated by Samuel Walker.
The Garden Committee reported that, in the discharge
of their duties, they had visited a greater number of
places than the committee of previous years. These
included Mount Auburn and Woodlawn cemeteries,
and several greenhouses and fruit and flower gardens.
Special mention was made of the orchard house of
Gardner G. Hubbard at Cambridge, the only one in the
State ; and a gratuity was awarded for it. Cherries,
pears, grapes, apricots, peaches, and nectarines, were
cultivated in it ; but the observations of the committee
led them to believe that it was best adapted to the
growth of fine peaches.
The year 1861, so memorable for the beginning of
the terrible four years' civil war, was memorable in the
annals of horticulture as one of the most unfavorable
ever known. On the morning of February 8, the
thermometer, which at noon on the day previous stood
at 40°, marked 21° below zero, and this in a sheltered
situation in a town ; while in some places in the open
country it was reported as several degrees lower. This
was probably as great a degree of cold as was ever expe-
rienced in the vicinity of Boston, if not the greatest. On
the 3d of March the thermometer rose to 75°; but this
unseasonable heat was, like the extreme cold, of short
duration. On the 18th of March the mercury fell to zero.
Not only was the fruit crop entirely destroyed in many
places, but the trees, especially the cherry and peach,
were killed, or severely injured. The blossom buds of
that hardy fruit the currant were in a great measure
326 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
destroyed, which, as well as could be remembered, had
not happened before for forty years. It was thought
that the injury experienced was due rather to the
extreme and sudden cold of February than to the sud-
den change from heat to cold in March. Besides the
unfavorable season, it was impossible that the absorption
of all minds in the terrible conflict then raging should
not exert an injurious effect on the exhibitions of the
Society. Yet the members contended to the best of
then ability against these adverse influences, and not
wholly without success ; and in one department a very
decided advance was shown — the number of new plants
exhibited was far greater than ever before.
The opening exhibition was held at the Society's
hall from the 23d to the 25th of May. The display of
plants and flowers, though limited in quantity, was far
superior in richness and quality to any of preceding
years. There were many fine and rare plants of which
specimens had never been exhibited, and fine specimens
of old favorites. The show of variegated plants was
particularly rich. A collection of ferns from Gardner
G. Hubbard comprised fifty species. Dennis Murray
had nearly a hundred species of native ferns and lyco-
pods, including the climbing fern (Lygodium palmatum),
now so much sought after. By vote of the Society the
proceeds of the exhibition, amounting to $62.50, were
given to the fund for the relief of the absent soldiers
of the State, to which was added the sum of $132, raised
by subscription among the members.
The annual rose show, on account of the little inter-
est taken in floriculture in the troubled condition of
national affairs, was limited to a few hours on Saturday,
June 29. On that day the roses were in perfection.
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1861. 327
The hall was filled with fine specimens ; and bushels of
choice flowers were taken away because there was no
room to exhibit them. The strawberry show occurred
on the same day, and, in consequence of the offer of
two silver cups by H. B. Stanwood and C. M. Hovey
as prizes for this fruit, a very fine display was made.
The cups were awarded for La Constante and Hovey's
Seedling. The hall was crowded with visitors to its
utmost capacity.
The annual exhibition was held September 17-20,
in the Society's hall, with the addition of a room on the
floor below for vegetables. The stands for cut flowers
occupied three sides of the hall ; a table for fruits, sepa-
rated by a space sufficient for visitors, encircled the
hall ; and all the room that could be spared in the centre
was devoted to plants. The library was set apart for
the grapes, which were numerous and excellent. The
floral display was unusually fine, and never appeared
to better advantage. The single specimens were
remarkably excellent, and the display of ferns and lyco-
pods was better than ever before. It was thought that
the exhibition of fruit would be exceedingly meagre ;
but happily this was not the case, though the specimens
were not equal to those of the previous year. Pears
were the principal fruit ; but the Seckel was the only
one which came up to the average of 1860. There
were very few apples, and of peaches and plums none
except from orchard houses. Specimens of the Salway
peach, from II. H. Hunnewell, were greatly admired :
they were eleven inches in circumference, and beauti-
fully colored. Two new foreign grapes, the Muscat
Hamburg and Golden Hamburg, were exhibited by
It. W. Turner, and carried off the prize over very
328 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
remarkable specimens of the older sorts. The season
was very favorable for ripening native grapes; and
some of the Rogers hybrids were shown before the
Society for the first time. The display of vegetables
had rarely if ever been excelled in quality.
We have spoken of the great number of new and
rare plants exhibited at the various shows through the
season, which were far too numerous to be specified
here ; but a few of the most conspicuous may be men-
tioned. There were, from Evcrs & Comley, Eucharis
Amazonica, in full bloom, and AUamanda Schottii;
from Edward S. Rand, sen., Latania Borbonica, L. rubra,
and Alocasia metallica ; and from Hovey & Co., " a fine
specimen of that sparkling little gem of a plant, Cala-
dium argyrites." Jonathan French exhibited a bloom
of Lapageria rosea. Of garden flowers, Barnes &
Washburn exhibited Stokesia cyanea, and James
McTear, a spike of gladiolus Calypso, three feet in
length, with thirty-two almost perfect flowers. The
double hollyhocks had become very popular, and there
was shown for the first time « a very fine double zinnia,
as large as and fully equal to a dahlia." On the 13th
of July, Jackson Dawson exhibited a plant of heather
(Calluna vulgaris) found growing wild in Tcwksbury,
Mass. This excited much interest; and the locality
was vi sited and carefully examined by the Flower Com-
mittee, who came to the conclusion that the plant
was probably indigenous there. The committee re-
marked, with some severity that, while on prize days
the stands wore full, when there were no prizes offered
tin' hall presented a long array of empty bottles and
bare tables.
The Fruit Committee reported, that, while the crop of
REPORT OF THE GARDEN COMMITTEE, 1801. 329
pears was far below the average, this was to some
extent compensated by the quality of the fruit pro-
duced, which was with respect to some varieties superior
to any before noticed. In the later exhibitions espe-
cially, the specimens were exceedingly fine and beau-
tiful. Among the varieties which showed the greatest
superiority were the Urbaniste, Marie Louise, Belle
Lucrative, Beurre D'Anjou, Beurre Langelier, Glout
Morceau, and Josephine de Malines. The only cherries
exhibited during the season were two baskets of very
beautiful May Dukes, from the forcing house of John
Fisk Allen.
The Garden Committee reported that, while there
had been less display and competition than usual during
the season, a permanent and growing love of horti-
culture had been manifested. Very few, if any, of the
noted estates and gardens in the vicinity had suffered
from neglect ; and in some cases, though to a less extent
than in past years, new grounds had been opened, glass
structures erected, and other improvements made. No
places were entered for premium ; but a gratuity was
awarded to Edward S. Rand of Dedham, for his neatly
kept grounds and greenhouses, and superior collection
of orchids. His collection of new and choice exotics
generally, was reported as beyond question the finest
in New England, and under the most perfect culture.
A gratuity was also awarded to Edward S. Rand, jun.,
for the skilful and economical laying out and manage-
ment of a new estate.
The year 1862 was as propitious to the horticulturist
as the preceding was unfavorable, the crop of fruit,
especially, being even more abundant than in the plenti-
ful year 1860. Nor was this abundance confined to any
330 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
particular fruit, but commenced with the strawberries,
and closed only with the apples and pears, the two
latter never having been larger, fairer, or better. The
peach and cherry trees indeed had been so far either
entirely killed or severely injured, that a large crop
could not reasonably be expected ; yet, wherever a tree
survived, it produced most bountifully. The crop of
currants was remarkable, and can never have been sur-
passed, the failure of the previous year having been
more than compensated by the abundance of this, as if
literally two crops had been produced in one. In many
instances the crop would not pay for gathering, and in
some places could not even be given away. Indeed, the
wonderful plenty caused dull sales and low prices for
all kinds of fruit, — a state of things which the Society
had been laboring for years to bring about, that the
poor, as well as the rich, might enjoy an abundance of
the luxuries of the orchard and garden. A farmer who
brought into Boston a quantity of 13artlett pears, and
was unable to sell them, except at very low prices, took
his load into State Street, and invited the newsboys to
help themselves, doubtless feeling abundantly rewarded
by the happiness he dispensed.
The year was also remarkably prolific in floral treas-
ures. So favorably were the supplies of sun and shade,
of rain and heat, meted out, that in every locality the
gardens prospered, and every class of plants flourished.
In such a year it might have been expected that the
exhibitions of the Society would have surpassed all
earlier ones ; and though such an advance may not have
been witnessed, owing to the civil war which continued
to absorb all minds, the number of exhibitor ■•■ of fruit,
and the quality of the specimens shown, proved a
EXHIBITIONS IN 1S02. 331
continued and unabated interest in that department.
Many new and rare species and varieties of greenhouse
plants graced the weekly shows. Ferns and lycopods
had become so popular as to be recognized by the offer
of a premium, ximong vegetables the tomato particu-
larly was shown in numerous varieties and a high de-
gree of perfection.
The Flower Committee having been greatly troubled
by the ignorance as to what constitutes a perfect flower,
a pamphlet describing the properties of plants and
flowers was compiled by the committee, which was
published by the Society, as the standard for judging.
At the opening exhibition, on the 31st of May,
although cut flowers were shown in considerable quan-
tities, the plants were few, and contributed by a very
small number of growers, and, as a whole, the exhibition
was the smallest for some years. In 1858 and the fol-
lowing years, four prizes were offered for the best spe-
cimen plants at this exhibition ; but the names of the
successful specimens were not recorded until this year,
when the first and second were taken by Edward S.
Rand, with Medinilla magnifica and Alocasia metallica ;
the third, by Ilovey & Co., with Ropala Corcovadensis ;
and the fourth, by Mr. Rand, with Maranta regalis.
At the rose show, on the 21st of June, the number of
contributors was much smaller than usual ; but the roses
were never presented in finer condition. The Hybrid
Perpetuals especially continued to increase in number,
and grew in favor, as the improved kinds, of fine form
and brilliant color, superseded the old varieties. The
show of strawberries was very fine : six berries of
Admiral Dunclas weighed four and five-eighths ounces.
On the 12th of July, Spooner & Parkman exhibited
332 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
for the first time the Lilium auratum, which they had
received directly from Japan. This magnificent lily was
also shown this year in England for the first time, and
everywhere its appearance was greeted as an event such
as could occur but few times in the life of a lover of
flowers. The same gentlemen also exhibited during
the summer many new plants, especially variegated
conifers and other plants from Japan, besides making
the largest, most frequent, and finest general displays of
flowers through the season. Very fine specimens of
apples were exhibited on the 1st of November for the
prizes from the fund bequeathed by B. V. French. Shel-
don pears weighing twelve and three-quarters ounces
each were shown at the same time by Hovey & Co.
The annual exhibition was in the Music Hall, from
the lGth to the 19th of September, the general arrange-
ments being similar to those two years before. The
show of pot plants was not as good as in some previous
years ; but the cut flowers were splendid. The season
was very favorable for dahlias, and they were shown
in great perfection. II. II. Ilunncwcll sent a plant of
pampas grass, with eight or ten full heads of its light
and silvery flowers ; also Cupressus Lawsoniana and
Sequoia (Washingtonia) gigantca. Three prizes were
offered this year for the best specimen plants at the
annual exhibition, which were taken by these three
plants.
Pears were never before exhibited in any thing like
the quantity or perfection of the specimens shown this
Mar. A dish of twelve Bartletts, from Josiah Stickney,
weighed nine pounds and six ounces. The apples, also,
were superior, especially the Gravenstcins. In a year
so auspicious for fruit, great expectations had naturally
AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1S62. 333
been formed with respect to this exhibition, and, though
it cannot be said that such hopes were disappointed,
perhaps they were hardly realized ; the deficiency, if
any, being, that some species, more particularly apples
and grapes, were not exhibited in as great variety as
was expected. The display of vegetables was satis-
factory ; but some of the principal contributors were
so over-burdened with their fruits, that they were un-
able to bestow as much attention upon the vegetable
department as they would otherwise have given. A
collection of thirty-three named varieties of turnips,
from John B. Moore, was of much interest.
The ninth session of the American Pomological So-
ciety, which was held in the Horticultural Society's
hall during the week of the exhibition, imparted addi-
tional interest to the occasion. The display of fruit by
the members of the Pomological Society was very large,
there being six collections of pears, comprising from one
hundred to three hundred and forty varieties each, and
four collections of apples of from sixty to one hundred
and sixty-four varieties each.
The awards by the Garden Committee were to Wil-
liam J. Underwood of Belmont, for neatly kept grounds
and skilful cultivation of flowers and fruits, and to J.
V. Wellington, for the best culture of out-door grapes.
Mr. Underwood's flower garden presented a particu-
larly attractive appearance ; but the attention of the
committee was especially directed to his strawberry
beds, and they noted the astonishing abundance and
superior quality of the crop. The committee also took
the opportunity to examine the extensive fields devoted
to strawberry culture in the vicinity, and derived much
gratification from observing their thrift and productive-
ness.
334 .MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
The year 18G3 brought a season, which, though not
so inauspicious as that of 1861, was unproductive in
comparison with the propitious one of 1862. The
weather at the commencement of the season was very
dry, so that the annuals and bedding plants, especially
verbenas and fuchsias, suffered materially, and there was
not so great a profusion of flowers at the weekly shows
as in previous years. The dry weather was also in-
jurious to the strawberry, affecting unfavorably both
the quantity of the crop and the quality of the berries.
Of pears there was probably not more than a third or
a half the crop of an average fruitful year ; and the
quality was, on the whole, rather inferior both as to
size and flavor, and the fruit was also more disposed
to blight and crack than usual. The crop of apples was
an entire failure; the deficiency that would in any
event have occurred being, probably, increased by the
fact that this was not the bearing year of the kinds
most generally cultivated in Massachusetts, and in
many places the trees had also suffered severely for
some years from the canker worm. The crop of native
grapes was good, and the quality above the average.
The scarcity of labor, so many persons being directly
or indirectly engaged in the defence of the country,
pro' .ably exercised an unfavorable influence on the
exhibitions, cultivators having less time to devote to
them than they would otherwise have been glad to give.
The vegetable department suffered more from this cause
than the others.
Some changes were made in the schedule this year,
prizes being for the first time offered for specified varie-
ties of strawberries, grapes, and pears, and for collec-
tions and single specimens of variegated leaved plants.
EXHIBITIONS IN" 1863. 335
The prizes for gardens were omitted. The Society,
following the example of the Royal Horticultural and
Royal Botanic Societies of London, voted to prepare
Certificates of Merit of three classes, to be given for
the exhibition of new, rare, and beautiful plants and
flowers, and new fruits and vegetables, for seedlings of
unusual merit, and for superior skill in cultivation.
The opening exhibition, on May 30, was very good.
The greenhouse plants were well grown, and attracted
much attention. The first prize for the best specimen
plant was awarded to James Comley, for Ananassa
sativa variegata; the second, to James McTcar, for Aphe-
lexis sesamoides ; the third, to Hovey & Co., for Coleus
VerschafFeltii, which was shown for the first time ; and
the fourth, to James Nugent, for Hydrangea Japonica
variegata. Dennis Murray exhibited one hundred and
ninety-four named species of fungi, several of which
were discovered by him. The rose show, on the 27th
of June, was one of the best ever made, especially for
Hybrid Perpetuals. This year witnessed the commence-
ment of those profuse and beautiful displays of seedling
gladioli which now form so prominent a feature of our
exhibitions through August and September. The prizes
for this flower had previously been confined to collec-
tions of ten varieties ; but this year there were added
prizes for the best twenty varieties and for the best
display. At the weekly exhibitions early in the season
the shows of forced fruits — mostly grapes, with some
peaches and cherries — compared well with those of
previous years ; but later in the season the shows of
fruits grown in the open air were not of an equally
satisfactory character, either as to the number of ex-
hibiters, the number of varieties, or the quantity of
836 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
fruit shown, and, though much was of fine quality,
some was very indifferent.
The annual exhibition was held at the Society's hall,
with much the same arrangements as two years be-
fore. The plants were all choice and fine — mostly well
grown specimens of variegated leaved plants. The first
prize for a specimen plant was awarded to C. M. Atkin-
son, for Cissus discolor; the second, to James McTear,
for Frenela Ventenatii ; and the third and fourth, to
Ignatius Sargent, for Testudinaria elephantipes and
Cissus discolor. The first prize for a variegated leaved
plant was awarded to Ilovcy & Co., for Pandanus
Javanicus variegatus ; and the second, to James Com-
ley, for Croton variegatum. Among the ferns shown
by Ilovev & Co. was the beautiful Pteris Cretica albo-
lineata. The gladioli, Japan lilies, dahlias, and other
cut flowers, were contributed liberally, and arranged
with unusual taste.
The show of fruit was satisfactory, as, though smaller
than usual, it was more select. While some varieties
of pears, such as the Louise Bonne of Jersey and
Duchesse d'Angouleme, wore inferior, the Sheldon, De
Tongres, Doyenne du Cornice, Beurre Bosc. and others,
were remarkably fine. The display of native grapes
was exceedingly interesting. Nearly two hundred plates
were on exhibition in upwards of twenty varieties, em-
bracing all the new sorts then lately brought to notice.
Among foreign grapes, II. II. Ilunncwcll sent speci-
mens of the Lady Downes, which were ripe on the '20th
of September, and hung on the vines in excellent con-
dition until the 30th of January, 1864, when they were
exhibited.
The winter of 1863-64. was remarkably uniform in
EXHIBITIONS IN" 1S64. 337
temperature, so that trees and plants exposed to it came
through without injury ; but the summer was extreme-
ly dry, and unfavorable to the growth and blooming of
plants, and consequently to the weekly exhibitions.
The crop of strawberries was much injured by the
drought, which was so severe that some fields were
burned up before half the fruit was ripened ; and in
some localities the grapes withered on the vines. The
pear crop was up to the average ; but that of other
fruits was small. Vegetables were checked in their
growth by the drought ; but the rains of July brought
them forward rapidly.
At the opening exhibition on the 28th of May, we
notice, for the first time, the new variegated honey-
suckle from Japan (Lonicera aureo-reticulata), from
two exhibiters. The display of hardy azaleas and rho-
dodendrons a few weeks later, from H. H. Hunnewell
and Hovey & Co., was unusually fine. The same may be
said of the roses at the rose show on the 25th of June,
especially the Hybrid Perpetuals, the specimens of
which from Francis Park man were very large and per-
fect. The shows of hardy herbaceous plants through
the season were very extensive, and comprised a great
variety, there having been added to the prizes for
spring herbaceous plants, offered in former years,
premiums for the best displays of named species and
varieties in July, August, and September. The gladi-
olus continued to be, in its season, the great feature
of the weekly exhibitions. The 27th of August was
prize day for this flower, when there was one of the
finest displays ever made, including, besides a large
number of prize stands, an immense number of seed-
lings, many of them of the greatest merit.
338 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Forced peaches and grapes were shown in great abun-
dance. ('. S. Ilolbrook exhibited on the 28th of May
some of the finest Crawford's Early peaches that had
ever been seen on the tables. In spite of the drought,
a few good strawberries were shown : a basket of Hov-
ey's Seedlings at the rose show, from Mrs. T. W. Ward,
were of remarkable size and color ; and several new
European varieties were exhibited by William Gray,
jim., and Ilovcy & Co. The last-named gentlemen
had for several years been zealous in testing every
new variety of this fruit, especially the large English,
French, and Belgian sorts. Of currants, the Versaillaise
had become prominent on the tables, though the Red
and White Dutch were still favorite varieties for gen-
eral cultivation. The season, except on very dry soils,
was remarkably favorable for native grapes, which con-
tinued to attract much attention throughout the country.
On the 19th of November there was exhibited a
Duchcssc d'Angouleme pear, grown by Charles Hova of
Los Angeles, Cal., seventeen and three-fourths inches
in circumference, and eight inches in length, and weigh-
ing four pounds, — the largest pear of which the Soci-
ety has any record.
The annual exhibition was held September 20-23, at
Andrews Hall in Central Court, the use of this room
having been freely offered to the Society by the pro-
prietor. The arrangement adopted was similar to that in
the -Music Hall. The centre table, filled with plants.
pre cnted a very beautiful appearance, the numerous
'gated plants and ferns being backed by tall and
handsome plants of various kinds. Large yuccas, palms,
and choice evergreens in pots on the stage, formed an
effective background for tables on which were placed
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1864. 339
the bouquets and baskets of flowers. The last named
feature had become very attractive ; and on this occa-
sion there were eighteen or twenty, all contributed by
ladies, and some of them arranged with exquisite
taste. The first prize for a specimen plant was
awarded to Hovey & Co., for Ropala Corcovadensis ;
and the first and second prizes for variegated leaved
plants, to James Comley, for Ananassa sativa variegata
and Cissus discolor.
The display of fruit surpassed expectation, it being
thought that the extreme drought would tell severely
upon the crop ; but, with few exceptions, the pears
were fully up to the usual standard of excellence, and
some surpassed it. The show of apples was limited,
yet some of the specimens were superb. Peach trees,
where healthy, produced abundantly, and there was a
good display of the fruit. Of foreign grapes the exhi-
bition was good, with some of extra quality ; and in
native grapes the show was especially fine. W. C.
Strong presented a very interesting and instructive col-
lection of twenty-five or more varieties. The most
noticeable kinds were the Delaware, Rebecca, Allen's
Hybrid, Iona, Adirondac, Framingham, Creveling, Con-
cord, Diana, and Isabella. Many new seedlings, includ-
ing the Rogers hybrids, were shown. An unusual
number of seedling pears were shown this year and
the preceding, from Dr. S. A. ShurtlefF, Frederick
Clapp, Francis Dana, and others.
The show of vegetables was pronounced as good,
under the circumstances, as any since the formation
of the Society, if, indeed, not superior to any. A
collection of one hundred and two named varieties of
beans, from Lucy H. Brewer of Hingham, a young lady
of thirteen, attracted much attention.
340 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
This brings us to the close of the second of the three
periods into which we have divided the exhibitions of
the Society, some of those of the next year having been
held in the new Horticultural Hall. We have often,
in the course of this chapter, spoken of the valuable
reports made from year to year by the different com-
mittees ; but it is due to the chairmen, upon whom
the duty of drawing up these reports generally devolved,
that some more particular mention of them should
be made, and especially of those of Joseph S. Cabot,
who filled the position of chairman of the Fruit Com-
mittee for nine years, and whose reports are distin-
guished by able and interesting discussions of various
subjects connected with fruit culture. Mr. Cabot was
also the first chairman of the Committee on Gardens,
and held that position for four years of the period in-
cluded in tliis chapter. The reports of Eben Wight,
who was chairman of the Fruit Committee for six years,
arc interesting summaries of the annual progress in
this department. Edward S. Rand, jun., was chairman
of the Flower Committee for six years ; and his reports,
besides the record of newly exhibited plants, are en-
riched with many valuable papers by himself and others
on the cultivation of various plants. Joseph Breck was
chairman of the Flower Committee for six years, and
of the Committee nf Arrangements for an equal time.
Francis Lyman Winship and P. Brown Hovcy each
served as chairman of the Committee of Arrangements
for five years. Daniel T. Curtis was chairman of the
A egetable Committee for eight years, in each of which
he rendered a full and faithful report. The reports of
the Garden Committee by the chairmen and secretaries
were of much interest. To all the gentlemen named,
COLLECTIONS OF PEARS. 341
and to those who filled the same positions for shorter
terms, and also to those associated with them on the
various committees, the Society is much indebted for
the success of the exhibitions during the period under
consideration. It should be remembered, that, during
this time, the amount appropriated for premiums was
increased from $1,200 in 1845 to $2,800 in 1864 (not
including the prospective prizes), and this notwith-
standing the depression caused by the civil war, and
the fact, that, in the last two years of this period, the
resources of the Society were taxed to the utmost by
the erection of their new building.
In closing this chapter we cannot but glance back
over the twenty years reviewed ; and although any sum-
mary of it would be out of place, for the chapter itself
is but a summary of the fuller records in the Trans-
actions of the Society, the Magazine of Horticulture, and
the Horticulturist, it may not be unprofitable to recall a
few of the more prominent points in the progress of
the Society. In reviewing the last chapter, we spoke
of the interest in the cultivation of the pear, as shown
by the zeal in collecting every variety ; and, though the
work of collection progressed during the time covered
by the present chapter, it will be seen that, towards
the close of the period, the culminating point as respects
numbers was reached, and that the work of selection —
the only object of these immense collections — had well
progressed ; and " select lists " might be found in every
horticultural publication. It was during this period
that two of our most valuable pears, the Dana's Hovey
and the Clapp's Favorite, were originated by members
of the Society, and first made known through its exhi-
bitions. The seedling pears raised by Mr. Dana were
342 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
the first to show the incorrectness of the opinion gen-
erally entertained, on the authority of Dr. Van Moras,
that this fruit deteriorated when raised from the seeds
of the best kinds, and that improved varieties could
only be obtained by sowing the seeds of the wild pear
through successive generations. What has been said of
the pear is true in a less degree of other fruits ; though
the strawberry and the grape rivalled the pear, if, in-
deed, the grape did not surpass it, in the interest excited.
We have chronicled the exhibition and testing of a large
number of strawberries, especially of the European
kinds, of large size, which, it is to be regretted, have
proved too tender for our climate. We have noted the
commencement of the excitement in regard to native
grapes, and the advent of the Concord, the Allen's
Hybrid, and other improved varieties which were early
exhibited before the Society. Perhaps we cannot better
estimate the advance in this fruit than by imagining our
gardens and markets stripped of the Concord grape
alone ; but in 1845 there were not only no Concords,
but few grapes of any kind, except Isabellas. And not
only was the Society diligent in promoting the improve-
ment of fruit culture in Massachusetts, but by its share
in establishing the American Pomological Society, and
sustaining its meetings and exhibitions, two of which,
in 185-1 and 186*2, were held in Boston under the au-
spices of the Horticultural Society, it has been instru-
mental in the advancement of pomology throughout
the country.
In the flower department we arc impressed by the
sum' zeal in gathering and testing every new thing
which we have witnessed in regard to fruit ; the rose
being here as striking an example as the pear among
NEW PLANTS AND FLOWERS. 343
the fruits. The collections of phloxes and other peren-
nial plants, as well as of annuals, will also be remem-
bered. It is to the enthusiasm of those who have
spared neither pains nor expense in collecting every
beautiful plant and flower that we owe the Dielytra,
the Wiegelas, the Deutzias, and the Lilium auratum.
These plants, now so popular, were all introduced within
the period covered by this chapter, and, not to speak
of many other less conspicuous examples now found in
every garden, make it memorable. Among greenhouse
plants, perhaps the most extraordinary of all is the
Victoria regia ; and although, owing to the expensive
arrangements which it requires, it is not now cultivated,
such is not the case with the multitudes of variegated
leaved plants, the introduction of which took place at
about the same time with the flowering of the Victoria.
The taste for these, both deciduous and evergreen, in
the garden and the greenhouse, as also for ferns and
lycopods, has been continually increasing as more beau-
tiful varieties have been introduced. Among flowering
plants we cannot recapitulate all the novelties exhib-
ited, and can barely allude to the improvement in the
fuchsia, the gloxinia, and the achimenes. In the gar-
den we notice first of all the multiplication of beautiful
roses, and especially the advent of the Hybrid Perpetual
class, which have now superseded the June roses. Per-
haps the gladiolus showed more improvement than any
flower, excepting the rose ; but scarcely less was the
improvement in hardy rhododendrons and azaleas, in
tree and herbaceous pseonies, in the phlox, the aster,
the petunia, the hollyhock, and the zinnia. Nor should
we forget the revival of hiterest in the exhibition of
native plants. The hardiness of the Japan lilies was not
344 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ascertained until the period embraced in this chapter.
though they were introduced before. In new seedlings
originated here the greatest advance was shown in the
gladiolus; but the phlox continued to be a favorite
subject for improvement; and the hardy rhododendrons,
•Japan lilies, and petunias, and many others on a smaller
scale, were the subjects of successful experiments.
Closely connected with this department is the growth
of a better taste in regard to the arrangement of flowers
in bouquets, baskets, and designs. The establishment
of the Committee on Gardens marks the progress, not
only of improvement in the culture of fruit, flower, and
vegetable gardens, but of taste in the laying out of
ornamental and pleasure grounds with artistic effect.
In the less showy but not less useful department of
the kitchen garden, we have noted the zeal of cultiva-
tors in testing large collections of potatoes, beans,
squashes, and turnips, and the improved varieties ori-
ginated or introduced. As, perhaps, the most striking
instance of improvement, we may mention the tomato,
now universally used, but in 1845 comparatively un-
known. The only kind then generally cultivated was
exceedingly irregular in form, and soft in texture ; but
in 1864 some of the smooth and solid varieties which
have superseded that had appeared. The Hubbard
squash, which keeps so much longer and better than
the Marrow, was one of the most important vegetables
gained by our cultivators. Not only were many new
varieties introduced, but the quality of those exhibited
showed a marked improvement in cultivation.
The twenty years from 1845 to 1864 were years of
marked prosperity to the Society; and though the period
includes several of the most inauspicious seasons ever
PROGRESS SHOWN. 345
known to horticulturists, the number of contributors
to the shows was so large, that the selection of even a
small proportion of fruits or flowers or vegetables from
the garden of each afforded, with those of greenhouse
growth, which are not injured even by the most unfav-
orable seasons, an exhibition interesting and instructive
to visitors, as well as creditable to the Society. And if
cold or drought caused the appearance of retrogression
in any year, such an effect was but temporary ; and it
was found, on the return of a more genial season, that
all that was lost had been regained, and still more added
to it.
CHAPTER IX.
THE EXHIBITIONS OF THE SOCIETY, 1865-1878.
The third division of the Society's exhibitions, which
forms the subject of this chapter, begins with the occu-
pation of the present Horticultural Hall. But, though
we include in it all the exhibitions of the year 1865,
the halls were not actually used for exhibition until the
annual show in September. The weekly shows were
held in Amory Hall until the end of August, after
which several exhibitions were made in one of the
stores under Horticultural Hall. Doubtless this transi-
tion state produced an injurious effect on the exhibi-
tions, and, though the winter and spring were remark-
ably favorable to vegetation, an exceedingly severe
drought occurred in July and August, which further
lessened the interest of the shows. The Flower Com-"
mittee, in their annual report, complained of the lack
of competition for a large number of premiums, and of
the small attendance of members and their families,
or of others, even though some of the exhibitions were
of the highest order. Under these circumstances it
will not be thought surprising that we find but one
plant among those exhibited at the earlier shows, to
note here, — the Bougainvillca spectabilis, from Brazil,
•• a new and rare plant," shown by Mrs. T. W. Ward
on the 18th of March.
The Agriculturist strawberry was shown for tL< first
346
AKNtJAL EXHIBITION, 1865. 347
time. Peaches were exhibited more abundantly than
for several years, and of the finest quality. The grape
fever raged higher, and many of Rogers hybrids and
other new varieties were tested. The show of apples
was small. The pear continued to grow in favor ; and
the Goodale and several seedlings from Dr. Shurtleff
were shown. The prospective prize " for the best new
seedling pear, after a trial of five years," was awarded
for Dana's Hovey. The show of melons, both water
and green fleshed, surpassed any in former years.
The annual exhibition was held September 19-22 in
the new halls, which had just been dedicated. In con-
sequence of the long and excessive droughts, some
doubts were felt whether all the space would be filled ;
but these doubts were removed on the opening day. In
the upper hall there were three tables running the
whole length ; the centre one filled with a selection of
the choicest variegated leaved plants, intermixed with
Palms, Yuccas, Ropalas, and other noble specimens of
tropical vegetation. The two outside tables were cov-
ered with pears, and against the wall on each side was
a table for cut flowers. The stage was fitted up with
two tables, one of which was filled with beautiful flow-
ering plants, and the other with begonias and ferns.
On a semicircular table in front, choice bouquets of
various styles were placed as a background, and the
table was filled with peaches and pears. The ante-
rooms and lobbies were also occupied with fruit tables.
The lower hall was arranged like the upper, with five
tables, of which the centre one was filled with apples
and grapes, and the others with fine vegetables. On
the platform were huge cockscombs, coniferous plants
in pots, and miscellaneous plants. In the vestibule,
348 MASSACHUSETTS ITOriTirrLTURAL SOCIETY.
at each side of the stairs, stood a noble Araucaria
imbricata, ten feet high, the contribution of II. H.
Bunnewell.
The display of plants was the finest for many years,
there being four exhibitors of collections of twenty
plants, and in all upwards of three hundred plants.
Among those from the Botanic Garden at Cambridge
was Ropala Jonghei, nearly ten feet high, and Cyano-
phyllum magnificum, six feet high ; from Hovey & Co.,
Ropala Corcovadensis, ten feet high, the new Hibiscus
Cooperi, and many others; from W. T. Merrifield, a
superb Ananassa sativa variegata in fruit; and, from
Francis Parkman, a splendid collection of thirty-six
evergreen trees and shrubs in pots. Six pineapple
plants, exhibiting the fruit in different stages of growth,
from inflorescence to maturity, attracted much atten-
tion: they wc^re from the garden of William Sprague,
Governor of Rhode Island. The prizes for the best
specimen plant were awarded to John F. Rogers, for
Ropala Youngi, and Thomas Hooper, for Lycopoclium
Wildcnowii; and those for specimen variegated plants
to Jonathan French, for Cissus discolor, and John F.
Rogers, for Pandanus Javanicus variegatus. The
drought was so severe that the cut flowers were not
up to the usual standard, though some superb gladioli
and asters were exhibited.
In the fruit department there was a deficiency in the
quantity and quality of the apples and native grapes ;
but this was, perhaps, more than counterbalanced by
the magnificent display of pears, which were generally
acknowledged to surpass, by their uniformly large size
and excellence, any previous exhibition of this fruit.
The display of vegetables was undoubtedly the finest
NEW FRUITS AND PLANTS IN 1866. 349
ever made by the Society, a very marked improvement
being visible in the selection and quality of the various
kinds. The attendance of visitors was very large, and,
for the first time for many years, the exhibition gave a
reasonable surplus into the treasury.
The winter of 1865-66 was very severe ; but the suc-
ceeding summer was warm, with abundant rains — very
favorable for the growth of plants, but not for the ripen-
ing of fruits. Vegetables nourished wonderfully, and
such fruits as the strawberry, which require an abundant
supply of water, were benefited, though the crop of this
fruit was less than it would have been but for the
drought of the previous year. There were no out- door
peaches, and the season was unfavorable for native
grapes. Very few apples were shown, this also being
attributed to the drought of the two preceding years.
The pears shown for prizes were not as large or as fair
as in some previous years.
That fine strawberry now known as the President
Wilder was shown for the first time. Hovey's Seedling
and Jenny Lind continued to be favorites. There were
but two contributors of raspberries, both of whom
showed Knevett's Giant; and five contributors of cur-
rants, who exhibited three varieties, — La Versaillaise,
Dana's Transparent, and Red Dutch.
The number of new plants exhibited was much great-
er than in 1865. April 4, George W. Pratt presented
Clerodendron Thomsons, which was highly praised by
the committee. James McTear showed the now popu-
lar Deutzia crenata flore pleno, for the first time ; and
Hovey & Co., the variegated Japan maize. At the
opening exhibition on the 23d of May, Francis Park-
man exhibited Aquilegia glandulosa ; and C. J. Power,
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Iresine Herbstii. A plant of Clerodendron Thomsons,
from II. II. Ilimncwell, finely trained, and in profuse
bloom, took the first prize as a specimen plant. June
13, Hovey & Co. presented Pyrcthrum roseum florc
pleno, •• as full as a quilled aster, and much resembling
it." At the rose show on the 27th and 28th of June,
Hovey & Co. exhibited a hybrid lily, between Lilium
lancifolium and L. auratum, combining the beauty of
the former with the size of the latter. July 11, Francis
Parkman showed Clematis Jackmanni, the first of the
hybrids of which so many beautiful varieties have since
been introduced ; and Sumner Downe, three stalks of
Lilium candidum, six feet high, and having fifteen
flowers each. Mrs. T. W. Ward was a frequent con-
tributor of choice hothouse flowers, among which were
Torenia Asiatica, Roupellia grata, Allamanda grandi-
flora, Gardenia Fortunei, etc. August 15, James
McTear exhibited Crocosmia (Tritonia) aurea ; and a
deep rose-colored variety of the pond lily was received
from Hyannis, and others in various shades, from deep
rose to pure white, from Rochester, N.H.
The day of the weekly exhibitions was this year
changed from Saturday to Wednesday. The attendance
generally was such as to indicate a fan- degree of interest
in the objects of the Society. -The rose show was on a
more extensive scale than usual, and an admission fee
was required; but it was not favored with propitious
weather. The latter part of the season, the exhibitions
were a scries of triumphs, crowned by the annual show,
which occurred September 18-22. The arrangements
were similar to those of the preceding year, being only
changed bo far as to place the plants on the two sides
of the hall, and the stand for cut flowers in the centre,
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1866. 351
with a table for fruit on each side. The grapes were
exhibited in the library room. The weather was very
unfavorable, and consequently the number of visitors
was small, except on the last day. James T. Ames ex-
hibited a plant of Alocasia macrorhiza fol. var., from
Ceylon ; George L. Stearns, a splendid spike of Hedy-
chium Gardnerianum ; and H. H. Hunnewell, one hun-
dred species of hardy conifers.
Notwithstanding the general impression that the pear
crop was hardly up to the average, the show of this fruit
was nearly equal to that of the preceding year. Large
collections were not admitted for want of room ; but
there were no less than eight competitors for the prize
for the best twenty varieties. Many fine specimens of
apples, particularly the Washington Strawberry, Grav-
enstein, and Hubbardston Nonsuch, were contributed.
J. W. Bailey of Plattsbnrgh, N.Y., sent some beautiful
clusters of Adirondac grapes, which were the ripest
natives exhibited.
The show of vegetables was remarkably fine both as
to quality and variety. The feature which particularly
called forth the admiration of visitors was a splendid
collection of cauliflowers, exhibited by eight competitors
for special prizes of silver cups. The first prize was
taken by James H. Smith, gardener to Francis Skinner ;
and the second, by J. C. Converse.
The Flower Committee, in reviewing the season,
spoke of the growing taste for botany, as manifested in
the very full and frequent displays of native plants and
flowers by young lady contributors, and made the sug-
gestion (which was adopted the next year) that prizes
should be offered as a means of fostering this interest.
The baskets of flowers showed much improvement, as a
852 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
result of the prizes offered for a few years preceding,
and were raised to a standard above that of our sister
cities. The progress of artificial hybridization was
noticed, especially in the gladiolus, where it had rendered
us independent of the French, and also in pinks, lilies,
and other flowers. The displays of herbaceous peren-
nial^ were more satisfactory than in previous years.
Among the newer pears shown were the General Tod-
leben, Emile d'Heyst, Conseiller de la (our. and Augus-
tus Dana. A large number of seedlings came from Dr.
S. A. Shurtleff, forty-five of which were described in the
report of the Fruit Committee. The Vegetable Com-
mittee made special mention of the Early Goodrich
potato and Black Pckin egg plant, which were first
shown here this year.
The Garden Committee reported that they had
accepted three invitations, — all from the government of
the city of Boston. The first was to the Public Garden,
where they observed indications of constant care and
interest, and deemed it, when contrasted with its con-
dition a few years before, a credit to the committee
having it in charge. Yet they found much room for
improvement, both in the plan and the keeping. The
second visit was to the farm connected with the House
of Industry on Deer Island- where the extraordinary
crops of roots were the most prominent feature. The
third visit was to Mount Hope Cemetery; and here
every part of the grounds was in good order ; and the
fine specimens of ribbon gardening were noticed with
special commendation, for the skilful and happy blend-
ing or distinct contrast of colors, and for freedom from
the sameness and stiffness to which this system is liable.
The winter of 1SG6 and 1867 was the reverse of that
EXHIBITIONS IN 1807. 353
of 1865 and 1866, there being no very severe cold,
though the average temperature was low, and the quan-
tity of snow was very great. The growing months of
1867, especially August, were remarkable for the ex-
traordinary quantity of rain. The season was most
favorable for the growth of flowers, and the weekly ex-
hibitions were good, though smaller than usual, in part
owing to the many rainy exhibition days. There was a
general lack of flavor in the fruits. It was noted that
the growth of early vegetables under glass was becom-
ing more and more an object of interest ; and the com-
mittee recommended the offer of prizes for its encour-
agement. The number of contributions of vegetables
to the weekly exhibitions was not as large as usual ; but
the quality of the specimens shown was so superior
as to make this department particularly interesting.
The time for the weekly exhibitions was changed from
Wednesday to Saturday, on which day they had been
held for many years. Indeed, it had become so fixed a
habit with many of the members to visit Horticultural
Hall on Saturday, that it seemed almost impossible for
some of them to become reconciled to any other day.
The shows were kept open this year until three o'clock,
an hour longer than they had previously been, and the
attendance showed a gradually increasing interest.
Among the new or beautiful plants exhibited may be
mentioned the Abutilon vexillarium, Sedum Fabarium,
and a new seedling Iris Kaempferi, from Hovey & Co. ;
Carolinea insignis, from E. H. Sawyer ; Marechal Niel
rose, which it was thought would prove a great acquisi-
tion, from William Wales ; Primus triloba rosea, from
John C. Chaffin ; Aquilegia ccerulea, Malus noribunda,
a double seedling Pyrethrum carneum, and two new
854 .MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
seedling delphiniums, from Francis Parkman; two
Beedling tree paeonies, named Col. Wilder and E. S.
Rand, jun., from Dr. J. P. Kirtland of East Rockport,
().. double Persian ranunculuses, from J. F. C. Hyde;
Cypripedium spectabilis and Rhexia Virginica, from E.
S. Rand, jun.; Styrax laevigatum, from J. J. Dixwcll ;
eight gloxinia plants, each a perfect specimen, from. Mrs.
T. W. Ward ; a fine spike of Lilium Canadense, from
.lames Comlcy ; Imatophyllum miniatum, from George
E. Nelson ; Eucharis Amazonica and Dendrobium no-
bile from George W. Pratt ; and Celosia pyramidalis
versicolor var. hybrida atrobruneis, from II. II. Ilunne-
well.
r riie rose show was larger and better than any previ-
ous one for a number of years, and was financially
successful. The exhibitions of native plants continued
to increase in interest. The Fruit Committee reported
a visit, on the 16th of January, to the fruit house of E.
S. Converse in Maiden, constructed on the plan of Pro-
fessor Nycc. Great hopes were entertained at this time
that autumn fruits might be kept through the winter in
perfection in such houses ; but these hopes were not
realized. Several new tomatoes, among which were
tin 1 Maupay's Superior, Foard. Eureka, and Boston
Market, were exhibited for -the first time; and the
McLean's Advancer and Carter's First Crop peas were
reported as new and promising.
The annual exhibition was all that could be desired,
though for want of room the contributions were much
crowded. The plants showed an advance over previous
in size, beauty, and excellence of cultivation.
The prize for the best specimen variegated plant was
taken by II. II. Ilunnewcll, with Alocasia metallica
THE SEASON OF 18G8. 355
A frost on the first night of the exhibition prevented
some of the contributors from replenishing their stands
of cut flowers.
The pears and apples were very large and handsome ;
but, owing to the wet and cool summer, the grapes were
inferior, though some Concords from Daniel Clark, the
finest ever seen, the bunches weighing sixteen and
seventeen ounces each, formed a notable exception.
The display of vegetables was in all respects good.
The winter of 1867 and 1868 was more than usually
severe ; and in many places the Bartlett and other pear
trees were seriously injured, blackening and dying in
summer from the effects of the winter's cold. The
spring of 1868 was extraordinarily backward ; and on
the first of June it was thought that the grape crop
would not ripen. The whole period of the blossoming
of the apple, pear, peach, and cherry, was excessively
wet, and, in consequence, many varieties did not set a
sufficient quantity of fruit ; yet the profusion of blossom,
which was quite marked, especially of the apple, pre-
vented any serious lack. Seldom has there been a more
unfavorable season for the floral department. The cold
and wet spring was followed by excessive drought from
the first of July to the middle of August. On the 18th
of September a heavy frost completely killed all tender
plants ; and this was followed on the 1 7th of October by
a snow storm and black frost so severe as to kill even
chrysanthemums. Yet, notwithstanding all these ad-
verse circumstances, the exhibitions at the Society's
rooms were generally good, doing even more credit to
the skilful horticulturists than in more favorable seasons.
The prize for the best specimen plant at the opening
exhibition was awarded to H. H. Hunnewell, for a
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Stephanotis floribunda. From the long list of new
plants reported by the Flower Committee we select, as
most worthy of notice, large and well grown plants of a
new seedling Erica caffra, from John -Hogan ; from
Hovey & Co., the Czar violet, Eurya latifolia fol. var.,
Thermopsis mollis, Viola cornuta, Brodiaea grandiflora,
and Bignonia Chamberlayni ; from E. S. Rand, jnn.,
Magnolia Lennei ; from II. II. Hunnewell, Lapageria
rosea, Gloire de Nancy (a new double-flowered Zonale
pelargonium), Anthurium Scherzerianum, and Raphio-
lepis ovatus ; A. J. Hillbourn, Exochorda grandiflora ;
J. McTear, Rhynchospermum jasminioides, Ornithoga-
lum aureum, and Schizostylis coccinea ; W. C. Strong,
Thyrsacanthus Schomburgkianus ; James Comlcy, Gla-
diolus Lyoni ; Gardner G. Hubbard, Cattleya Mossise,
Dendrobium formosum, Brassia Lanceana, and Catase-
tum triclcntatum ; Mrs. T. W. Ward, Combretum purpu-
reum ; Francis Parkman, Lilium Browni, L. excelsum, L.
supcrbum, and a seedling Rudbeckia laciniata ; Marshall
P. Wilder, Stenocarpus Cunninghami ; and W. Cairns,
Echeveria retusa. A very interesting feature of the
exhibition on the 1st of August was a large and rare
collection of cones of California trees, from J. Q. A.
Warren, including Pinus Coulteri, P. Sabiniana, P. in-
signis, P. pondcrosa, P. contorta, P. Lambcrtiana, Picea
nobilis, P. grandis, P. bracteata, Cuprcssus macrocarpa,
('. Goveniana, and Sequoia gigantea. The next week
Mr. Warren exhibited a collection of pressed California
wild flowers, and also of Sandwich Island ferns and
flowers, among which were many rare species. On the
same day a large and interesting collection of everlast-
ing and other flowers and fibrous plants was presented
from the Cape of Good Hope Agricultural Society.
FLOWERS AND FRUITS IN 1868. 357
Among these were many species of Helichrysum, Phce-
nocoma prolifcra, Jimcus serrata, Malva, Mora?a, Carox-
ylon, Cyperus, Amaryllis Belladonna, Corymbium stric-
tum, and Myrica cordifolia.
The rose show was reported as better than ever
before, especially the Hybrid Perpetuals, doubtless
owing to the special prizes offered by H. H. Hunnewell
for this class. The prize for the best forty varieties
was taken by John C. Chaffin ; and that for the best
thirty, by Francis Parkman. A special Chrysanthemum
Show was announced in the schedule of- prizes for the
first time this year. It occurred on the 14th of Novem-
ber ; but, owing to a snow storm and severe cold, it was
an entire failure. Prizes were also first offered this
year for Wardian cases.
Few new varieties were reported by the Fruit Com-
mittee which need be noticed here. The Jucunda
strawberry, which was first shown in 1867, and then
disappointed expectations, was this year regarded more
favorably. The Wilson gained steadily, notwithstanding
its poor quality. La Constante and Triomphe de Gand
were kept for prizes, and the latter was by many
retained for a general crop. The Agriculturist was
generally condemned. The Philadelphia raspberry was
condemned as an exhibition fruit ; and, though produc-
tive and hardy, its size was against it, even for market.
The display of apples was excellent, consisting mainly of
the standard kinds ; but specimens of Grimes's Golden
Pippin were exhibited, and regarded as promising.
Though the season was so extremely unpropitious for
the grape, the exhibition was fair. A bunch of the
Eumelan was received from Dr. C. W. Grant of lona,
N.Y., on the 11th of October, and was well spoken of
358
-MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
by the committee. The prospective prize was awarded
for the Clapp's Favorite, as the best seedling pear after
a trial of five years.
The Vegetable Committee reported that their attention
was called during the season to several new and valua-
ble vegetables, the most important of which were the
General Grant tomato and the Early Rose potato. The
latter, originated by Albert Bresee of Hubbardton, Vt.,
was exhibited for the first time on the tables of the
Society on the 30th of June, and again on the 11th of
July, and was awarded the Society's silver medal. Prob-
ably no other horticultural production ever attained so
wide popularity in so short a time as this potato.
The fortieth annual exhibition was held September
22d to the 25th, and greatly exceeded the anticipations
of the members. The plants were very fine, and in-,
eluded more novelties than usual, and showed higher
culture than before. Hovey & Co. sent a Seaforthia
elegans ten feet high, the rare Agave filifera, Panda-
mis elegantissimus, 13ambusa Fortunei fol. var., Oplis-
menus imbecilis fol. var., etc. W. C. Harding showed
Anthurium regale, with superb foliage, the rare San-
chezia nobilis, the equally rare Dalcchampia Roczliana,
and others. Among those contributed by II. II. Ilunne-
well were Dracaena australis and D. indivisa, six feet
high, Yucca aloifolia variegata, Musa vittata, Stephcn-
sonia Sechellamm, Dieffenbachia Barraquiniana, Also-
phila australis, six feet high, and a leaf of Musa enscte
twelve feet lon<7.
o
The display of pears was large and fine, and, though
perhaps not equal to what had been seen in former
years, would have been a credit to any state or country.
The display of apples was extensive', and excellent in
EEPOKT OF THE COMMITTEE ON GARDENS, 1S68. 359
quality. The show of grapes, though not equal to that
of many previous seasons, was good. Stephen Underbill
of Croton Point, N.Y., exhibited several hybrid seedling,
grapes ; and the Walter was shown by Ferris & Cay-
wood of Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
The exhibition of vegetables was one of the finest
and most extensive ever made by the Society. A prom-
inent feature was the numerous and fine collections of
potatoes, embracing all the popular varieties in culti-
vation. Albert Bresee exhibited four seedlings raised
from the same seed ball as the Early Rose. This vari-
ety was shown by a large number of growers.
The report of the Committee on Gardens was of more
than usual interest, the year having shown a very man-
ifest progress in this department. The committee re-
ported visits to Mount Hope Cemetery ; to the grounds
of Edward S. Hand, jun., where the show of standard
rhododendrons and kalmias was admirable, and the col-
lection of native plants unequalled ; to the grounds of
ex-president Joseph Breck at Brighton; and, on the
same day, to the grounds of W. C. Strong in the same
town, where they were shown an interesting experiment
in the propagation, of the potato, a field of four acres
having been planted from six pounds' of the Early Rose,
and where they examined the " hillside greenhouse "
lately erected by Mr. Strong. They also visited at this
time the extensive pear orchard of Henry P. Kendrick
in Brighton. Later in the season they paid a visit to
W. C. Harding, in Boston Highlands, where they wit-
nessed an example of subtropical gardening, the grounds
being decorated with aloes and the sago palm, in view
from the windows of the mansion, while here and there
were fine specimens of Caladium bicolor, C. esculcn-
300 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
tin n. Ricinus, Celosia, Nicotiana, Canna Indica rubra,
and Zea Japonica, the last three forming a background
for Gladioli, Dracaena versicolor, and Amaranthus
versicolor. At Forest Hills Cemetery the committee
noticed a fine rosette of ribbon gardening. After leav-
ing that place, they visited the grounds of Marshall
P. Wilder in Dorchester. Another visit was to the
orchards of Dr. G. II. Lodge in Swampscott, where the
committee saw the most perfect example of the wine-
glass type of pruning to be found in the State, every
tree showing the most persevering care and attention,
though many had evidently fared hard in storms. The
last visit was to the garden of S. G. Damon in Arling-
ton, planted mainly with pear trees and grape vines ;
the dry location and shelter, with a light, warm soil,
being particularly favorable to the latter fruit, and the
collection including all the new and promising varieties.
The season of 1869 was generally favorable to the
horticulturist. The preceding winter was mild, and the
summer months were remarkably free from very dry or
stormy weather. But on the 8th of September occurred
one of the most terrific gales on record, which not only
destroyed all the annuals and bedding plants, but many
of the finest trees, and left the gardens only wrecks of
what they were but an hour before.
The weekly exhibitions of flowers presented many
fine displays of novelties, including a large number of
hybrid seedlings. The committee noted with pleasure
that artificial hybridization, so long practised by Euro-
pean horticulturists with such gratifying results, was
receiving the attention which it deserved. E. S. Rand,
jnn., continued to exhibit rhododendrons in great
variety, the best new kind being Mrs. John Glutton.
PLANTS AND FLOWERS IN 18C9. 361
Orchids were shown more frequently than before ; John
G. Barker, gardener to G. G. Hubbard, contributing
quite regularly. The collections of native flowers were
many and large, among the contributors being the bot-
any class of Dean Academy. E. II. Hitchings exhib-
ited native flowers on almost every Saturday from the
first of May until October, many of the species shown
being rare in this vicinity, and requiring long walks to
procure them, and Mr. Hitchings's aim being to show
only such as were worthy of cultivation. The opening
exhibition was postponed from the time first fixed to
the 16th and 17th of June, during the week of the
" Peace Jubilee," and in extent and excellence was supe-
rior to any openhig exhibition ever held by the Society.
It was also successful financially. The three prizes for
the best specimen plant were awarded to Mrs. T. W.
Ward, for Rhynchospermum jasminioides ; H. H. Hun-
newell, for Abutilon Thompsoni ; and Hovey & Co.,
for Pandanus elegantissimus. The rose show, though
smaller than in the previous year, comprised a larger
number of perfect specimens than usual. The exhibi-
tion of asters was uncommonly fine.
At the annual exhibition the plants were better than
the previous year, though, as usual, somewhat crowded.
The prize for the best new specimen plant was awarded
for Aucuba Japonica, which was exhibited in fruit by H.
H. Hunnewell. The female plant was introduced many
years previously ; but it had never been shown in fruit
before, as the male plant was not brought from Japan
until 1861. The prizes for the best specimen variegated
plants went to Hovey & Co., for Pandanus Javanicus
variegatus, and H. H. Hunnewell, for Dracama regime.
Other new or rare plants shown were, from Dr. G. R.
3G2 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Hull of Newport, R.I., the Retinispora pisifcra, which
had proved perfectly hardy at that place, and Ailantus
glandulosus with golden variegated foliage ; Stuartia
pentagyna, from E. S. Rand, jim. ; Jasminnm Sambac
florc plcno, from Mrs. T. W. Ward; Gymnostachyum
argyroneureum and Iresine Lindeni, from W. C. Har-
ding, the latter recommended as a fine bedding plant ;
Allamanda nobilis, from II. II. Ilnnnewcll ; Latania
Borbonica, Pandanns Linnci, and Vallota purpurea su-
pcrba, from llovcy & Co. ; an elegant specimen of
Cyanophyllum magnificum, from the Massachusetts Ag-
ricultural College ; Begonia Pearcei, from W. C. Strong ;
and Gynerium argenteum, from George Craft.
The new seedlings which received awards from the
committee were a fine herbaceous paeony, from John
Richardson ; an improved Lilium lancifolium and coleus,
from Marshall P. Wilder ; phlox Sultana, and delphi-
nium Mrs. George Derby, from Francis Parkman ;
Zonale pelargonium Miss Gertrude, from John G.
Barker ; and. seedling gladioli, from J. S. Richards and.
George Craft. Francis Parkman also exhibited a re-
markable seedling lily, now known as Lilium Park-
manni, a hybrid between Lilium auratum and L. lanci-
folium.
Among the most interesting objects in the fruit de-
partment w r ere some very large specimens of Louise
Bonne of Jersey, and Duchesse d'Angoulcme pears.
from G. F. B. Lcighton of Norfolk, Va. ; a collection
of California fruits, from Dr. J. Strentzel of Martinez ;
another collection of the fruits of the same State, which
had been exhibited at the meeting of the American
Pomological Society at Philadelphia, and was shown
here through the courtesy of the Pennsylvania Horticul-
FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN 1869. 363
tural Society ; and a collection of twenty-five varieties of
Nebraska apples, sent by Hon. It. W. Furnas, president
of the Nebraska Horticultural Society. Among these
the Fameuse was especially fine. Few new fruits were
presented. The President Wilder strawberry appeared
to as great advantage as in previous years ; the Jucunda
was held in high and growing esteem ; and the Wilson
gained steadily in the market. Raspberries of the Black
Cap family were shown, and were condemned by the
committee. The Wilson's Early blackberry was shown,
and received the first prize. At the annual exhibition,
the effects of the gale of September 8, on the pears
and apples, were plainly shown ; but the grape tables
were completely filled, and it was doubted whether a
finer display could be made in any part of the country.
The Delawares and Concords were particularly fine.
Stephen Underhill of Croton Point, N.Y., exhibited his
seedlings, Croton and Senasqua.
The season was a remarkably favorable one for vege-
tables. The committee reported that every year wit-
nessed improvement in the cultivation of early vegetables
under glass, and they noticed the erection, by way of ex-
periment, of forcing houses heated with hot water, in
the hope of saving the heavy cost of the manure used
for hotbeds, as well as of the transportation and labor
in handling. The committee had visited one of these
houses, which, on the 22d of December, was filled with
a fine crop of lettuce and radishes nearly ready for mar-
ket. Among the new vegetables introduced were the
Dwarf White Seeded Wax Podded bean and Egyptian
beet, from Fearing Burr.
The display at the annual exhibition was fully equal
in quality to that of the preceding year. Perhaps the
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
most interesting feature was the very large and superior
collections of potatoes ; and among these the centre of
attraction was six seedlings from Albert Brcsee, the
originator of the Early Hose. This variety was found
in the smallest collections, and was thought by the com-
mittee, taking into consideration its many good qualities,
and the lengthened period to which it retains them, as a
table potato from very early in the season until the
time for planting again arrives, to be unrivalled by any
other variety. Mr. Brcsce's success in originating so
many new and superior seedling potatoes had stimulated
other persons in various parts of the country to like
efforts.
The winter of 1869-70 was remarkable for uniform
mildness, the thermometer falling to zero but once in
the vicinity of Boston ; so that the fruit buds were unin-
jured by cold. The spring and early part of the summer
were warm, with an excess of rain ; while the months
of July, August, and September, were above the average
in temperature, with but little rain ; and the drought
was consequently severe, causing the premature falling
of leaves and fruit, and, in some cases, the shrivelling
of the wood of trees. Yet, notwithstanding this unfa-
vorable influence on fruits, flowers, and vegetables, the
shows were excellent in all these departments.
The Flower Committee reported that they were
pleased to note a continuance of the lively interest
taken by the members in the raising of hybrid flowers
from seed, and mentioned as among the first triumphs
in this direction the carnations originated by J. F. ('.
Eyde, president of the Society, which were more robust.
and flowered more abundantly, than varieties of Euro-
pean origin, and were also perfectly hardy. Other seed-
NEW PLANTS AND FLOWERS IN 1870. 365
lings which the committee thought worthy of particular
mention were fourteen coleuses, from H. II. Hunnewell,
the markings being very distinct and decided in color.
E. S. Rand, jun., showed a seedling rhododendron,
named Daisy Rand, which promised well ; and John
Richardson, an herbaceous pseony, called Dorchester.
Francis Parkman exhibited a double seedling delphini-
um, named John C. Hovey, and a number of remarkable
seedling lilies, somewhat resembling Lilium umbcllatum,
but quite distinct. Hovey & Co. showed a new seedling
variety of Lilium longiflorum, named longhiorum gran-
diflorum, with both foliage and flowers larger than those
of the common variety. George Craft and J. S. Richards
continued the improvement of the gladiolus from seed,
with good success.
Among the plants introduced and exhibited for the
first time the committee mentioned the Clianthus Dam-
pieri, from A. G. Peck, flowers of which were shown
later in the season, grown as an annual in the open
ground, by Andrew Wellington. H. II. Hunnewell
exhibited Tacsonia Van Volxemi, Begonia pcltatum
nigrum, and Ficus dealbata, the last receiving the first
premium for the best new pot plant at the annual ex-
hibition. Mr. Hunnewell also presented a plant of
Coleus Berkleyi, grafted with four different varieties.
Francis Parkman exhibited Wistaria Sinensis florc pleno,
from a plant supposed to be the first which had flowered
in Europe or America. It was received by him directly
from Japan. E. S. Rand, jun., exhibited Hcpatica
angulosa, from Hungary, with single dark blue flowers
three times the size of our native species. From Hovey
& Co. came Lithospermum prostratum, Yucca angusti-
folia, and Passiflora Decaisneana. George Everett ex-
366 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
fine spike of Lilium colchicum, or Scovitzianum,
and a specimen of Brodhra congesta. Other new 01
rare specimens were tlic Franciscea confertifolia, from
II. II. Hunnewell; Medinilla speciosa, from E. W.
Wood; Lilium auratum, of open culture, and Rhus
glabra laciniata, from E. S. Band, jim. ; the beautiful
Viburnum plicatum, from J. J. Dixwell ; Campanula
Medium rosea, from Ilovey & Co. ; Yucca floribunda,
from Francis Parkman ; Ilumca elegans, from James
Comley, and Lasiandra macrantha, from M. S. Scudder.
A specimen of the Sarcodes sanguinca, or Californian
snow plant, from Lake Tahoe, six thousand feet above
the level of the sea. was exhibited by John F. Osgood,
and attracted much attention. The displays of native
flowers continued to be extensive, and comprised many
rare kinds. Mrs. C. X. S. Horner's exhibition on the
'20th of August was the largest ever made, numbering
two hundred and sixty species and varieties. The
display of petunias, gladioli, and asters, was injured by
drought; but the collections of verbenas were re-
markably fine for the season, and the zinnias were good.
The display of baskets of flowers had come to form
one of the most attractive features of the weekly exhi-
bitions, and was uniformly good throughout the season.
The display of cut flowers was smaller than usual, in
iquence of the drought.
The opening exhibition was not as good as usual, and
only a small part of the premiums were awarded. The
i prize for the best specimen plant was taken by
Dracaena reginse, and the second by Croton longiflorum
\ iriegatum, both from II. H. Hunnewell ; and the third,
by the Ivy-leaved pelargonium L'Elegant, from C. M.
oson. The display at the rose show was good, not-
PLANTS AND FEUITS IN 1870. 367
withstanding a severe hail storm on the day previous.
The annual exhibition was the best for several years,
particularly as regarded pot plants. The arrangement of
the larger hall was an improvement over that of previous
years, the long central stand for plants being replaced
by two smaller ones, between which, in the centre of the
room, was a fountain having the basin ornamented with
shells and aquatic plants. The prizes for the best speci-
men plant were awarded first to Hovey & Co., for Pan-
danus reflexus, and second to H. H. limine well, for
Vriesia Glaziouana, and, for the best variegated plant, to
Hovey & Co., for Hibiscus Cooperi. A prize for the
best tree fern was this year offered for the first time,
and taken by IT. H. Hunnewcll, with Cyathea dcalbata.
The special chrysanthemum show, on the 12th of No-
vember, was good both in quantity and quality.
The exhibition of fruits commenced with fine speci-
mens of forced strawberries ; but in other forced fruits
there was a marked decline. The prize for the best
four quarts of any variety of strawberries at the rose
show was awarded for the President Wilder, the Jucun-
da being a very close rival ; but a decided preference
was given to the Wilder in point of flavor. A superb
basket of La Constante strawberry was shown by John
C. Park on the 2d of July, — the very acme in color,
size, quality, and general beauty. The Charles Downing
was shown by W. A. Parsons. Among raspberries the
Northumberland Fillbasket, shown by John B. Moore,
appeared for the first time, and took the first prize. It
was first noted this year that the currant crop was seri-
ously affected by the imported currant worm (Nematus
ventricosus). A large number of seedling peaches
were shown, many of which were equal to or better
868 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
than tlio named kinds. The exhibition of plums was.
r several previous years, almost limited to two
contributors. French prunes, both fresh and dry, were
shown by Dr. Louis Tribus.
Of apples the year was truly one of plenty, and in-
deed of such superabundance as to cause discouragingly
low prices in the market. The prize collections ex-
hibited consisted generally of the standard varieties ;
but on the 10th of September the first prize for a single
dish was awarded to John G. Barker, for the Won
Pippin. A new and promising seedling, called the
Hunter's Pippin, was received from Francis L. Lee.
O. ('. Gibbs exhibited a dwarf tree of the Keswick
Codlin, filled with fruit of good size, indicating the
possibilities with the apple in pot culture.
Among early pears the Beurre Giffard was first, as it
had been for several years. It was followed by the
Clapp's Favorite, which had become generally cultivated,
and took all the prizes in its season, having no compeer
in size and beauty. At the annual exhibition the
most noticeable specimens were the Flemish Beauty,
from F. D. Atherton of San Mateo, CaL, one of the
smallest measuring eleven and a half by ten and a half
inches in circumference. The Duchesse d'Angouleme,
from Stephen Hill, the Doyenne du Cornice, from J. 8.
Fallow, the Mount Vernon, from Walker & Co., the
Bartlett and Beurre Gris d'Hiver Xouveau, from Gor-
ham S. Train, the Sheldon, from Davis & Bates,
several dishes of Andrews, arrested attention as su-
perior specimens. Henry McLaughlin of Bangor, Me..
sent specimens of the Eastern Belle, a new seedling
variety originated by him. resembling the Belle Lucra-
tive in appearance and quality. Messrs. F. & L. Clapp
GRAPES IN 1870. 369
exhibited several seedlings, of which No. 56 was re-
garded as promising.
Previously to the annual exhibition, the Adirondac,
Delaware, and Iona took prizes offered for native
grapes ; but the Ionas were grown in a very sheltered
situation. The committee thought it simple justice,
and not boasting, to say of the display at the annual
exhibition, that, in extent and quality, it was not sur-
passed, if it was equalled, in the most favored sections
for the grape. Not less than seventy varieties were on
the tables, all fully ripe, and a large number of them
superb specimens. The most attractive though not
the most desirable was the Union Village. The Adi-
rondac appeared well, but came from favored localities.
Iona was fully ripe at this time of a propitious season.
A profusion of fine bunches of Israella was noticeable.
Most of Rogers's seedlings were present. Wilder (No.
4), Barry (No. 43), and Salem were most attractive.
Very fine specimens of Rebecca were shown. The
Eumelan gave general satisfaction this year. The most
promising new seedling was one from Elijah F. Arnold.
Another from N. B. White, called Amber Queen, was
thought promising. Seedlings were shown also by
James Comley, John B. Moore, J. Fisk Allen, and
others. The display of foreign grapes through the
season was quite limited. On the 20th of August A. G.
Peck made a fine display of fruiting vines in pots. At
the annual exhibition, the display was large and the
quality excellent.
In the vegetable department, choice specimens of
forced and other vegetables were shown before the
opening exhibition, among them being the Prince of
Wales rhubarb, a highly colored variety, of superior
370 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
quality, from James Oomley. At the opening exhibition
J. 13. Moon- presented four bunches of asparagus, of
twelve stalks each, one bunch of which weighed fifty-
three ounces. A bunch of Conovcr's Colossal, from New
York, weighed but little more than two-thirds as much,
Btalk for stalk. The season was not so prolific in novel-
lies in this department as some of its predecessors; but
the Trophy tomato was exhibited by William E. Baker
and others, and thought to possess valuable points.
The new introductions of the previous year continued
to produce a favorable impression. The exhibitions of
potatoes, both at the weekly and annual shows, were
unusually fine and in great variety. For earliness, pro-
ductiveness, and profit in the field and garden, the Early
Rose took the lead of all others. This and the Peerless
were considered the two best for general cultivation.
The General Grant and Boston Market were the two
leading tomatoes ; and on the 6th of August the former
took all the four prizes offered.
The effects of the severe and long continued drought
were plainly visible in this department of the annual
exhibition; but the show, though less in quantity than
iu previous years, was, on the whole, much better than
anticipated by the committee. The display of melons
in all their varieties had rarely if ever been equalled.
AVatenuclons were shown weighing from thirty-three
to forty pounds, and in quality all that could be desired.
The fruit of the cgs; plant was also shown in great per-
fection ; but not a single cauliflower was offered.
It is not often that we have the means of comparing
a horticultural exhibition here with a similar one in
Europe; but the annual show was this year visited by
William Robinson, the author of the Parks. Prome-
COMPAEISON WITH EUROPEAN SHOWS. 371
nades, and Gardens of Paris, and since well known
as the founder and editor of the Garden, and whose
impressions of the exhibition were published in the
Gardener's Chronicle. After speaking of the Horti-
cultural Hall, with its extensive and excellent library,
which he thought perhaps the best collection of horti-
cultural books he had ever seen, and its arrangements
for the various exhibitions, he said that the floral de-
partment of the show differed very little from that of a
similar exhibition in England, and that
" The marked feature of the show was its fruit. The hall had
more the appearance of a special fruit show in France or England
than an ordinary miscellaneous exhibition. The display of apples
was remarkably fine ; long and wide tables being densely covered
with large and handsome fruit. Man}' kinds were, however, in a
green and imperfect state, inasmuch as the date was too early to
see apples in perfection as a class. The pear show was also very
fl no , — I think a few degrees better than we could display in
England. It is the custom here to cultivate particular varieties
to a much greater extent than in England ; thus the pear known
to us as the Williams's Bon Chretien, and here as the Bartlett, is
cultivated everywhere, both for use when ripe, and for preserving
abundantly for use throughout the year. It attains a higher char-
acter here than in England, generally has not the somewhat dis-
agreeable musky flavor it has at home, and is often seen of a fine
clear lemon yellow. One dish of twelve Bartletts weighed eight
pounds and six ounces."
Mr. Robinson thought the display of grapes very
fine, both native and European kinds covering a large
space. The latter were as fine as at an average English
show, but not as well colored. The natives, though
smaller, looked excellent, but were very objectionable
to an English palate.
Most of the autumnal vegetables of English gardens
372 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
— cabbages, turnips, beets, potatoes, etc. — were seen in
fair condition, though the potatoes seemed more sappy,
and less desirable, than in England. Tomatoes were a
much more prominent feature. Melons, both water
and musk, were very fine. Heads of Indian corn, so
much eaten in the green state, formed an item in the
prize lists, and were very large and handsome. But
strangest of all to an English eye were the enormous
fruits of egg plants.
The Garden Committee reported that the long con-
tinued drought had made all attempts at ornamental
horticulture of such doubtful or inferior success, that
few persons were anxious to exhibit their places, and
that consequently the only one visited was the estate
of Edward S. Rand, jun., known as " Glen Ridge,"
in Dedham. This place, which was entered in 1868
for the Ilunnewell Triennial Premium, was visited by
the committee in that and the two succeeding years,
the visit of 1870 being made in the first week in June,
before the drought commenced. The committee, after
speaking of the principles which should guide the
owner of such an estate in laying out and improving it,
and themselves in awarding the prizes offered, went
on to note the principal features of Mr. Rand's estate.
The first of these was the profusion and superb variety
of Rhododendrons, intermixed with Azaleas, Kalmias,
and Andromedas, most of which were in flower at the
time of the committee's visit. Next the committee
noticed the Agaves, Yuccas, etc., and other decorative
plants, and the foliage plants, such as Carinas, Ricinus,
Colocasias, Pelargoniums, Coleuses, and Ar alias, forming
beds with borders of Alternanthera, Centaurea, and
Golden Pyrethrum. As a cultivator of bulbs, Mr. Rand
MEETINGS FOR DISCUSSION IN 1871. 373
had few equals, and his collection of native plants was
one of the most complete. The lawns were orna-
mented with beautiful specimens of the magnolia,
cut-leaved beech, cut-leavecl weeping birch, and vari-
ous species of Picea, Pinus, and other evergreens.
The committee commented on the arrangement of the
trees and shrubs, and on the laying out of the grounds,
and, regarding the progress made in their embellishment
and improvement, awarded to Mr. Rand the largest
Hunnewell prize.
We have spoken of the meetings held early in 1853,
for the purpose of exchanging ideas on practical points
in horticulture. Nothing further was done in this
direction until President Strong, in his first annual
address, on the 7th of January, 1871, after reviewing
the work accomplished by the Society, suggested various
means of increasing its usefulness, among which were
the reading of papers and holding discussions on horti-
cultural subjects. As the result of this suggestion,
two meetings were held in the following summer, — the
first on the 21st of June, the second day of the rose
and strawberry show, when an interesting discussion
on the culture of strawberries took place. The second
was on the 15th of July, which was prize day for sum-
mer lilies, and was appropriately devoted to the culture
and hybridization of the lily.
At the last meeting in the year 1871, the Society
protested, in the name of horticulture, and also as tax-
payers whose property would be thereby injured, against
the indiscriminate removal of the venerable English
elms known as the " Paddock Elms," opposite the
building of the Society on Tremont Street, which had
been ordered by the Board of Aldermen ; and appointed
374 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
a committee to present to the City Government a re-
monstrance against their removal. This action, though
it may haw delayed the destruction of these trees, could
not wholly avert it. They were removed in February.
1874, a short time after another effort had been made
to save them, the first one falling while the Society was
engaged in a horticultural discussion.
The Committee on Plants and Flowers reported that
the exhibitions during the season of 1871 had been
larger and better than ever before. While the general
displays of cut flowers at the weekly shows had some-
what diminished in numbers, those of specialties, novel-
ties, and hybrid seedling varieties, both pot and cut
specimens, had steadily increased, so as to form the
most interesting and instructive part of the exhibitions.
The opening and rose shows having been found to come
so near together as to affect each other injuriously, the
experiment was tried this year of making the rose show
the grand summer exhibition, and proved entirely suc-
cessful. It was held in both halls, which were filled
with one of the largest and best displays of choice plants
and flowers ever made by the Society. At the annual
exhibition the display of both plants and flowers was
good, especially that of plants, which were well grown
and in great variety. Their arrangement on smaller
and lower platforms was found to be an improvement.
The committee recorded, as deserving of particular
mention, the many rare orchids exhibited by. J. G.
Barker, gardener to G. G. Hubbard, among which
were Oncidium amictum, Cattleya elegans, Epidcndrum
lancifolium, and E. atropurpureum roseum. James
McTear exhibited Azalea Indica Souvenir de Prince Al-
bert, Arabis lucida, and Campanula garganica. Francis
NEW PLANTS AND FLOWERS IN 1871. 375
Parkman showed two new hybrid varieties of trumpet
narcissus, the Emperor and Empress; a new seedling
polyanthus, Golden Crown; and Anthericum liliago.
E. W. Wood showed fine specimens of Medinilla
magnifica; James Comley, a handsome seedling tri-
colored Zonal pelargonium named President Hyde, and
another double seedling variety; Hovey & Co., Spiraea
palmata and Sciadopitys vcrticillata, new plants from
Japan ; John Richardson showed another seedling pae-
ony, Rubra Superba; W. K. Wood, Excsecaria Co-
chinchinensis ; Louis Guerineau of the Botanic Garden,
Cambridge, Delphinium nudicaule, and Desmodium gy-
rans, or telegraph plant ; C. M. Atkinson, a new seed-
ling carnation, Lady Bird ; E. H. Hitchings, many rare
native plants, among which were a clear white and a
rose colored variety of Lobelia cardinalis ; and George
Everett, Lilium tigrinum flore pleno. Charles S. Sar-
gent exhibited the first forced plants of lily of the
valley, which has now become so popular for winter
blooming. From the Cambridge Botanic Garden came
thirty species and varieties of hardy Sempervivums ; and
from Waldo O. Ross, Pachyphytum bracteosum, Stapelia
bufonis, and a variety of Sempervivums. These were
the first collections shown of the "succulents" in which
so much interest has since been taken. The prizes for
the best specimen plant at the rose show were awarded
to Francis Parkman, for Thujopsis dolabrata variegata;
C. S. Sargent, for Cupressus Lawsoniana erecta ; and
Hovey & Co., for Statice imbricata; and, for the best
new pot plant at the annual exhibition, to Charles S.
Sargent, for Phormium tenax variegatum.
Although the fruit crop of 1871 was not as large as
that of the previous year, the season was, on the whole,
376 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCEETT.
favorable, the greatest deficiencies being in the apple
and tlit- grape. An abundance of rain in June was so
beneficial to strawberries, that the exhibition at the rose
show was probably the finest ever made. The silver
cup for the best four quarts was again taken by the
President Wilder, exhibited by the originator. La Con-
stante. from IIovcv and Co., was again superb. Several
seedlings presented by John B. Moore for the second
tim ■ were thought to sustain the promise of the previous
year. Mr. Moore also showed a collection of new for-
eign varieties, none of which in later years proved
superior to the standard kinds, of which the exhibition,
beyond these, mainly consisted.
Cherries were more abundant, freer from the curculio,
and more generally exhibited, than in any year since
1860, the trees having been injured in the spring of
1861. In the intervening years this fruit had been but
little cultivated, and few new kinds had been intro-
duced ; so that the exhibitions were mainly confined to
the old standard varieties.
Among raspberries, the Clarke appeared to be gain-
ing in estimation ; while the Philadelphia, though enor-
mously productive, was so deficient in si/.e and beauty.
that it did not come into favor, and t lie same was the
ci^e with the Black Caps. The Kittatinny blackberry
was shown, and gained in favor as the season advanced,
receiving the first prize on the 5th of August. The
Smith's Improved gooseberry was shown, and pronounced
of the first quality.
Of plums, but a single dish was presented at the
annual exhibition, while the weekly shows were not
much better. — a strong but not pleasant contrast with
the shows of thirty years previous. Peaches were mainly
APPLES AND PEARS IN 1871. 377
represented by seedlings, of which many fine varieties
.were shown. The Queen pineapple was exhibited in
fruit by R. W. Turner.
The falling off in the crop of apples is indicated by
the fact, that, in 1870, eleven out of the twelve prizes
offered for collections of apples at the annual exhibition
were awarded, but in 1871 only four of the same. The
finest display during the season was made by E. A.
Colman of Lawrence, Kan., a former resident of Boston,
who in October placed on the tables very fine specimens
of more than a hundred varieties, many of which had
seldom or never been shown here before.
The display of pears was abundant and fine. Speci-
mens of the Duchesse de Bordeaux, of the crop of 1870,
were presented by H. Vandine, and gave promise of
value as a late kind. Of summer pears, the committee
remarked that the Doyenne d'Ete, Beurrc Giffard, and
Clapp's Favorite, had so long taken precedence, that they
must be set down as the best of their respective seasons ;
and that the superiority of the Clapp's Favorite was so
marked, that no other variety of the same season could
compete with it. The committee visited the grounds of
Messrs. Clapp when this variety was in perfection, and
found the trees so fully and evenly hung with large, well
formed, and well colored specimens, that they were
more than ever impressed with its value. Many new
and promising seedlings were also observed in fruit.
At the annual exhibition more than one hundred and
sixty dishes were offered for the twenty-two prizes for
single varieties. The Beurre d'Anjou was found in
fifteen out of sixteen collections, next in favor coming
the Bartlett and Duchesse d'Angouleme. The prize
for new varieties was awarded to Marshall P. Wilder,
378 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
who exhibited forty-two kinds never before shown,
many of them possessing much merit, but not of such
superior excellence as to supersede the old standards.
A most extraordinary cluster of Beurre d'Anjous was
sent from California by F. D. Atherton. Other varie-
ties exhibited from California, notably the Seckel and
Dana's I lovey. were found to have attained in that
warm and dry climate a sweetness unknown here,
though at the loss of the fine aroma and flavor which
mark our best varieties.
The crop of native grapes was most abundant, and
under the warm, dry weather which prevailed until Sep-
tember, gave promise of excellent quality ; and it was
hoped that the two previous seasons, so favorable to this
fruit, were to be followed by another equally propitious ;
but these hopes were disappointed by severe frosts.
Yet the display at the annual exhibition, though not
equal to that of the previous year, was satisfactory. A
very striking feature was the number of new seedlings
shown, J. B. Moore exhibiting fifty-two. A collection
of hybrids from Dr. A. P. Wylie of Chester, S.C., was
placed on the tables by Marshall P. Wilder. Several
hybrids were shown by N. B. White. The Eumelan
continued to make a favorable impression ; but the Isra-
ella had disappointed expectations. Two new foreign
grapes, the Madrcsfield Court Muscat and Royal Ascot,
were Bhown by Ilovcy & Co.
The Committee on Vegetables reported continued
improvement in that department. At one of the earlier
exhibitions Fearing Burr made a very interesting dis-
play of dandelions, — the French Large-leaved, Trench
Thick-leaved, Red-seeded, and the American Improved,
the Last being preferred. Fine samples of the early
VEGETABLES IN 1871. 379
Wyman cabbage were shown, one, on the 29th of June,
weighing twenty-eight pounds. James Carter & Co. of
London presented four varieties of Italian onions, the
bulbs weighing upwards of two pounds each. James
Comlcy exhibited very fine specimens of three new sorts
of lettuce, — All the Year Round, Monitor, and Little
Pixie. The prospective prize for the best seedling
early potato, after a public trial of three years, was
awarded to Albert Bresee, for the Early Rose.
The committee stated that great improvement had
been made within the past few years in the several
varieties of root crops, more especially the beet, and
that finer or more uniform specimens of this vegetable
had never been seen than were shown at this exhibi-
tion. Besides the Egyptian, mentioned in a former
report, the Dcwing's Improved and the Hatch were
named as varieties to which these remarks would apply.
The annual exhibition was thought, taking into account
the quantity, variety, and especially the quality, of the
specimens offered, to surpass any previous show. The
cauliflowers, celery j egg plants, and melons were par-
ticularly fine.
The meetings for discussion were resumed in 1872,
the By-Laws having in the mean time been so amended
as to provide for a Standing Committee on Publication
and Discussion, which was charged with the control
of all discussions, lectures, essays, etc. The first meet-
ing for the season, of this character, was on the evening
of February 7, when Marshall P. Wilder delivered a
lecture on Hybridization and the Production of New
Varieties from Seed, which was published in full in
the Transactions of the Society. Meetings were held
in March, when essays were read by John B. Moore
380 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
on the Cultivation of the Strawberry; William C.
Strong, on the Construction of Greenhouses, Hothouses,
Propagating Houses, etc. ; and Charles Barnard. 2d, on
Flowering Plants for Winter Blooming, each essay being
followed by a discussion of the subject.
The winter of 1871-7'2, following the droughts of
1870 and 1871, was remarkable for severe (though not
extreme) cold at times, accompanied by high winds,
little snow, and sudden changes. Thanksgiving Day,
the 28th of November, 1871, was of unprecedented
severity, the thermometer falling nearly to zero, and
the wind blowing a gale. The temperature of March,
1872, was more than nine degrees below the average
for about fifty years, the mercury early in the month
falling below zero for several days, and the wind
blowing heavily. So much injury was done to ever-
green trees and shrubs, especially those with broad
leaves, many being entirely destroyed, that a commit-
tee was appointed to investigate the cause. This
committee made an elaborate report (published in
full in the Transactions), attributing the injury to the
loss by evaporation from the leaves, which the roots
were unable to supply from the ground, affected by the
drought of the two previous summers, and deeply frozen
by reason of the absence of snow, and also to sudden
cold following comparatively warm weather, which had
brought the leaves into as great action as was possible
at the season. To prevent such disastrous results in
the future, the committee advised the protection of trees
and shrubs from the wind by shelter, and mulching the
soil, which they considered almost as necessary in win-
ter as in summer. Careful culture would also do much,
l>\ rendering plants more healthy and vigorous, toward
enabling them to withstand vicissitudes of temperature.
PLANTS AND FLOWERS IN 1872. 381
But little harm was done to fruit trees, not even the
peach buds being killed ; but grapes and strawberries
received much injury, or were entirely destroyed, and
the same was the case with blackberries and raspberries
when unprotected.
The summer, in extreme heat and excess of rain, was
such as to recall the accounts of tropical climates. As
regarded the exhibitions, the year was one of general
prosperity in all departments, though a severe rain storm
on the first day interfered somewhat with the annual
exhibition.
An exhibition of Indian azaleas was held this year
for the first time, on the 1st of May. The prize for the
best single specimen was taken by Mrs. T. W. Ward,
with Princess Mary of Cambridge. The committee
mentioned, as among the most interesting specimens ex-
hibited from time to time, the seedling camellias, from
Hovey & Co. ; the Climbing Devoniensis rose buds, from
James Comley ; the Niphetos rose, from Joseph Tailby ;
and at the annual exhibition, from W. C. Strong & Co.,
a collection of seventy varieties of ferns and mosses,
including the finest plant of the beautiful Adiantum
Farleyense that had then been shown. The displays
of native plants at the weekly exhibitions were unusu-
ally interesting and instructive, comprising many rare
specimens, and were neatly arranged, and correctly
named. The collection from E. H. Hitchings, on the
10th of August, was pronounced the best and rarest
ever exhibited. The prize for native ferns also brought
from the same gentleman a collection of forty-seven
species and varieties, many of them very rare. Not as
many new plants were shown as usual ; but we must
not fail to mention the Aquilegia chrysantha from Louis
382 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Guerineau of the Botanic Garden, and the Chameleon
colons from Henry E. Chitty of Paterson, N.J. At
the rose show the first prize for a specimen plant was
awarded to Charles S. Sargent, for Phormium tenax
variegatum, and the second to Mrs. T. W. Ward, for
Rhynchospermum jasmuuojdes. At the annual exhibi-
tion the prize for the best specimen plant was awarded
to William Gray, jun., for Papyrus antiquorum. By
furnishing this plant with the richest alluvial soil, and
watering it twice a day, Mr. Gray produced stems eight
feet high, with tops finely expanded, and having a pro-
fusion of narrow, gracefully dependent leaves. This
specimen probably had no superior in the country. The
second prize was awarded to Hovcy & Co., for Dasy-
lirion glaucum. The prizes for the best specimen
variegated plants went to C. S. Sargent, for Golden
Queen holly, and W. Gray, jun., for Gynerium argen-
teum fol. var. The chrysanthemum show, especially of
pot plants, was quite small, owing to the epidemic
affecting horses at that time, which deprived several
intending cxhibiters of all means of bringing in their
plants.
In the fruit department we notice the exhibition
of two new strawberries, the Colonel Cheney, shown
1>\ Warren Heustis, and the Nicanor, both of which
n*(; MASSACHUSETTS nORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and beautiful, and showing evidences of taste and care
in all directions.
The year 1873 was a cold one, nine out of the twelve
months being below the average temperature. The
month of December, 1872, which may properly be
taken into account here, was the coldest since 1837, the
mercury on Christmas Day falling to 10° below zero.
On the morning of January 30, 1873, it fell to 15°
below zero, rising the next day to 15° above. On the
3d of May snow fell to the depth of two inches.
No injury was done to the fruit crop by these vicissi-
tudes, except that the fruit buds of the peach were, in
most places, wholly killed. The spring was generally
cold and backward, with drought, commencing the latter
part of May, of such severity as is rarely experienced so
early in the season. The effect of the drought on the
crop of strawberries was most disastrous, reducing it, as
was thought, about one-half. From the same cause, the
cut flowers, which had always been a prominent feature
of the exhibitions, were much below the usual standard.
The Flower Committee reported that the exhibitions
in the early part of the year were of unusual interest,
owing partly to the meetings for discussion, which largely
increased the attendance, and encouraged growers to
bring their plants and flowers for exhibition. The
special azalea exhibition was much more successful than
the previous year. The collections of spring herbaceous
plants exhibited by E. S. Rand, jun., and James McTear,
were uncommonly large and beautiful. E. II. Hitch-
ings exhibited an exceedingly interesting collection of
native plants, comprising, besides others, nine species
of violets. At the rose show all the roses were unu-
sually tine. The Ilunnewell special prizes for the best
PLANTS AND FLOWERS IN 1873. 887
twelve of any one variety were awarded to C. S. Sar-
gent, for La Reine, and Francis Parkman, for Auguste
Mie. The pot plants showed that they had been grown
by skilful hands. The prizes for the best specimen
plants were taken by William Gray, jun., with Arabia
pulchra, and Hovey & Co., with Buxus arborea. The
baskets of flowers were of more than usual merit, the
addition of graceful ferns greatly increasing their beauty.
A very interesting and instructive feature of the exhi-
bition on the 5th of July was a collection of twenty-
two species of native sedges and grasses from Miss M.
E. Carter. The magnificent orchids shown from time
to time by Edward S. Rand, jun., added largely to the
interest of the exhibitions. On the 26th of July Mr.
Rand received both the first and second prizes for these
plants. Special mention was also made by the com-
mittee of the Dendrobium formosum giganteum, and
the Acropera Loddigesii, var. aurantiaca or citrina,
exhibited by him later in the season. The shows of
balsams and petunias, and especially of asters and ver-
benas, were unusually fine ; and the exhibitions gen-
erally continued to increase in interest until the annual.
The exhibitions of dahlias in October were remarka-
bly beautiful. That from George Everett, on the 11th
of the month, was thought the finest display ever made.
There were sixty varieties, filling a large stand, and
noticeable, not only for the beauty of the flowers, but
for the harmonious arrangement of the colors ; the
centre of the stand being deep velvety crimson, gradu-
ally shading down to white at one end, and to buff at
the other. The chrysanthemum show on the 8th of
November was highly successful, all the prizes being
awarded. Finer specimens had never been seen. Of
388 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
new seedling plants, the committee noticed with com-
mendation the camellias of Marshall P. Wilder, Ama-
ryllis vittata hybrida of Joseph Breck, a verbena from
James Comley, a phlox from A. McLaren, and a del-
phinium from Francis Parkman.
The Fruit Committee reported that the exhibitions of
forced strawberries had been more abundant this year
than before, and also that on the 1-Ath of Juno straw-
berries forwarded in cold frames were shown by Charles
Garfield. This method of cultivating strawberries has
since been employed by other growers. Notwithstand-
ing the severe drought, many fine strawberries were
exhibited. Among the new varieties were the Black
Defiance, Kissena, and Champion. John B. Moore
presented the Caroline, thought to be the most valua-
ble of his seedlings, and the Belle, another seedling,
which the committee believed to be the largest straw-
berry ever placed upon the tables. The true Ox Heart
cherry, a very large variety, which, though not new, has
seldom been seen, was exhibited by J. E. M. Gillcy.
The exhibitions of forced and orchard house peaches
improved, while, as before remarked, the crop of out-
door fruit was scanty, owing to the destruction of the
fruit buds by the winter. Very fine specimens of Hale's
Early were, however, exhibited by J. B. Moore.
The crop of apples was generally inferior in quantity
and quality. Specimens of several late varieties of the
crop of 1872 were exhibited; among them, on the 10th
of May, the Hunt Russet, from John B. Moore. The
committee deemed this one of the most desirable of all
apple-. At the November exhibition the King of
Tompkins County, a variety highly esteemed in the
State of New York, was presented by F. &. L. Clapp.
FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN" 1873. 389
The crop of pears was unprecedcntedly abundant
and of excellent quality ; and the exhibitions of this
fruit corresponded in character, yet they presented few
points proper to be noticed here. Remarkably well
kept Bcurre d'Anjous of the crop of 1872 were shown
by Gardner Brewer on the 15th of March. The exhi-
bitions of fall and winter pears in October and Novem-
ber were unusually extensive and excellent : at the
latter the Bcurre d'Anjous of J. II. Fenno, and the
Winter Nelis of John L. Bird, were the finest ever seen
of their kinds. The number of new varieties exhibited
was less than usual. The seedlings from the Messrs.
Clapp, B. S. Fox of California, and others, were again
shown.
The exhibitions of native grapes were fully up to the
average. A large number of seedlings were brought to
the attention of the committee, from J. II. Ricketts of
Newburgh, N.Y., S. J. Parker of Ithaca, N.Y., E. W.
Bull, John B. Moore, N. B. White, George Haskell,
and John Fisk Allen. The show of forced grapes was
better than usual.
The Vegetable Committee reported that, owing to the
dull and cloudy weather early in the season, the contri-
butions of forced vegetables were much smaller than on
previous occasions ; but some choice specimens were
exhibited. The shows in May and June were unfavora-
bly affected by the severe drought which prevailed at
that time. Very interesting exhibitions of peas, com-
prising many new varieties, were made through July, by
G. A. Law. The William I. was regarded as one of the
best varieties. The Canada Victor and Arlington toma-
toes were shown for the first time. George W. Pierce
exhibited a new variety of the egg plant, a cross
between the Black Pekin and a large purple kind.
390 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Two notable events in the history of the Society
occurred this year, — the Rhododendron Show on Bos-
ton Common, and the meeting of the American Pomo-
logical Society. The Rhododendron Show was projected
and carried out, with the assistance of a committee of
the Society, by its constant friend, II. II. Hurmewell,
who, while guaranteeing the Society from any loss,
generously offered to give it the benefit of whatever
profit might remain after the payment of the necessary
expenses.
The exhibition was carried out, as planned by Mr.
Ilunncwcll, in a manner never before attempted in this
country. It was opened on the 6th of June in a tent,
about three hundred feet long by eighty feet wide,
pitched not far from the centre of the Common. It
was arranged on the plan of similar exhibitions in Eng-
land; the plants, instead of being placed on stands in
pots or tubs, were sunk or planted in beds of turf, as
if growing naturally in the ground, the whole interior
of the tent presenting the appearance of a garden.
From the entrance at the eastern end a broad central
gravelled walk, bordered by wide strips of grass ex-
tending to the sides of the tent, brought the visitor
opposite a mass of rhododendrons more than forty feet
in diameter, forming the central feature of the exhibi-
tion. The front of this bed was composed of a group
of seedlings raised by Mr. Hunnewell. Here the path
divided, passing around near the margin of the tent,
but still with a border of grass between it and the can-
vas, l lie two brandies uniting at the further end of the
tent, and enclosing three irregularly shaped beds, the
first containing the mass of rhododendrons already men-
tioned, and the second a similar mass: the third was
RHODODENDRON SHOW IN 1873. 391
planted with groups, and fine single specimens, at such
distances as to display their full beauty. In the border
were also single specimens of fine new varieties, many
of them in standard form, as well as kalmias and
hardy azaleas. The ground on either side of the broad
main walk was planted with tree and other rare ferns,
palms, Indian azaleas, Musa ensete, and other tropical
plants, from the greenhouses of Samuel Ii. Pay son,
Charles S. Sargent, William Gray, jun., H. F. Durant,
and the Bussey Institution. A fine specimen of Seaforth-
ia elegans, from Mr. Pay son, occupied a position in the
centre of the main walk, being necessarily placed under
the highest part of the tent. Mr. Payson also contrib-
uted two very fine plants of Latania Borbonica, and a
Phoenix dactylifera. Mr. Hunnewell contributed a Co-
cos coronata, and a Seaforthia elegans, each fifteen feet
high, a Chamoerops excelsa eight feet high, and an Areca
lutescens ; Mr. Gray, a Dicksonia antarctica ; and Mr.
Sargent, an Araucaria excelsa. There were also fine
specimens of Aralia pulchra, Geonoma pumila, Cyathea
dealbata, and Pritchardia Gaudichiana. All the rhodo-
dendrons and hardy azaleas were from Mr. Hunnewell.
That the scene might be more natural, the surface of
the ground, instead of being brought to a uniform level,
was made slightly undulating, the main path descend-
ing with a very gradual slope to the middle of the tent,
beyond which the ground rose more rapidly to the end,
where the elevation afforded such a view of the whole
interior of the tent as to tempt the visitor to rest on one
of the seats placed there, and enjoy the scene.
This was by far the most successful horticultural
show ever held in Boston as regards the number of visit-
ors. It closed on the 26th of June, after having been
392 MASSACHUSETTS HOKTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
visited, as was estimated, by 40,000 persons, of whom
25,666 paid an admission fee. By Mr. Ilunnewell's
desire many of the pupils in the public schools and of
the inmates of charitable institutions received free tick-
ets of admission. The total receipts were $7,3 10, and
the expenses $5,744.72, leaving a profit of $1,565.28,
which, agreeably to Mr. Ilunnewell's suggestion, was
set apart from the funds of the Society, the income to
be devoted to the encouragement of the cultivation of
rhododendrons and hardy azaleas. The thanks of the
Society were voted to Mr. Ilunnewell for his noble and
generous efforts in the cause of horticulture, and for the
deep interest manifested by him in the welfare of the
Society, and more especially with regard to this grand
exhibition.
The fourteenth session of the American Pomological
Society, being its quarter centennial, was held in Bos-
ton on the 10th, 11th, and 12th of September, 1873, by
invitation of the Horticultural Society, and brought to-
gether a larger assembly of distinguished pomologists,
and a greater display of fruit, than had ever before
been gathered on this continent. Both of the Society's
halls were filled with the fruit contributed. The upper
hall was arranged with a very long and wide table in
the centre, on which the fruit from Nebraska and Can-
ada was placed, entirely filling it. Two tables on each
side of this, and tables on the stage, the latter appropri-
ated to the many seedling fruits presented, completed
the arrangement. That of the lower hall was similar.
Among the most important contributions presented was
that from the Nebraska Horticultural Society ; consisting
of two hundred and ninety-seven varieties, and that of
the Kansas State Horticultural Society, consisting of one
AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1873. 393
hundred and ninety-three varieties ; much the greater
part of these two collections being apples, which were
remarkable for their size, beauty, fairness, and freedom
from insects. The Fruit Growers' Association of Onta-
rio, Canada, sent three hunched and ninety-eight varie-
ties, including one hundred and twenty-two pears, fifty-
one grapes, and fifty plums, — a greater variety of
plums than had been seen in Boston for many years.
The South Haven (Michigan) Pomological Society sent
a very interesting collection, comprising apples, pears,
and plums, peaches in quantity, thirty-four varieties of
evaporated fruits, and fourteen varieties of canned fruit.
There was a beautiful collection of one hundred and
fifty-one varieties of apples from the Polk County (Iowa)
Agricultural and Horticultural Society. Ellwanger &
Barry of Rochester, N.Y., contributed three hundred
and seventeen finely grown varieties of pears ; Marshall
P. Wilder, four hundred and four varieties ; and Hovey
& Co., three hundred and twenty-eight varieties. F. &
L. Clapp had eighty-six varieties of seedling pears, and
in the centre a large dish of Clapp's Favorite, which at-
tracted much attention as the handsomest dish of pears
in the room. James H. Ricketts of Newburgh, N.Y.,
and John B. Moore, had large collections of seedling
grapes. The Deseret (Utah) Agricultural and Manu-
facturing Company sent seventy-five varieties of apples,
pears, plums, and peaches. There were oranges, shad-
docks, and pomegranates from Mississippi, and oranges
from California. The total number of dishes of fruit
exhibited was more than six thousand, from every part
of the United States and the British Provinces, from
Nova Scotia to California. At an early hour on the
morning of Thursday, the 11th, a majority of the dele-
394 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
gates, by invitation of William Gray, jun., visited his
residence ; and, at the close of the afternoon session on
the same day, a larger party visited the beautiful estate
of II. II. Hunnewell at Wcllcslcy. These places
offered peculiar attractions for a company of ladies and
gentlemen, many of whom were experienced horticultu-
rists and botanists, and at both they were hospitably
entertained. The usual meetings for discussing the
characters and cultivation of fruits were held during
the three days of the session, in Wesleyan Hall, and
the occasion closed with a grand banquet to the dele-
gates on Friday evening in Music Hall.
The annual exhibition of plants and flowers by the
Horticultural Society was held at the same time with
the pomological gathering ; but, both the Society's halls
being filled with the fruit presented on that occasion,
Music Hall was secured for the floral display, which
proved to be the best ever made by the Society. The
hall was fitted with low platforms for the plants, and
these, being . smaller than had previously been used,
afforded an excellent opportunity to display the plants,
so that not one was crowded out of sight. These plat-
forms were so arranged, like the beds in a garden, that,
when all was complete, the visitors might have fancied
themselves in a garden of tropical plants. Two tree
ferns from S. R. Pay son, Alsophila australis and A. ex-
celsa, from twelve to fifteen feet high, and the handsom-
est pair ever exhibited, occupied the centre of the hall,
and received the prize. Fifteen greenhouse plants exhib-
ited by Edward Butler, gardener at \Yclleslcy College,
received the highest prize for a collection, and among
these none attracted more attention than a beautifully
trained plant of Lygodium scandens. The prizes for
ANNUAL EXHIBITION, 1873. 395
the best single specimen plants were awarded to S. R.
Payson, for Cibotinm regale, and Hovey & Co., for
Pandanus rccurvus ; for the best specimen variegated
plants, to Hovey & Co., for Pritchardia aurea var., and
H. H. Hunnewell, for Ananassa sativa fol. var. The
prize for the best new pot plant was awarded to H. II.
Hunnewell for a very fine plant of Phormium Colensoi
var. The Palms, Marantas, and Draccenas were splendid.
The ferns were remarkably fine, and, besides the large
specimen plants, there was a collection from J. W. Mer-
rill of one hundred and thirty native and foreign species
and varieties. The newly established premiums for suc-
culent plants brought out a collection of two hundred
and sixteen species, from Louis Gucrineau of the Cam-
bridge Botanic Garden, and one from Hovey & Co. of
one hundred and fifteen species. Fine collections of
caladiums, agaves, and lycopods, were shown. Among
the cut flowers the gladioli were most prominent. Noth-
ing seemed to please the visitors from abroad so much ;
and nothing surprised them so much as to be told that
almost all were seedlings raised by the exhibitors. The
dahlia renewed its old time beauty ; those shown by
George Everett being particularly fine. ">. It was
Introduced to cultivation before 1S17, having been described by Coxe in that
NATIVE FRUITS. 461
these are spoken of as new fruits brought into notice
by the exertions cf the Society. 1 But now we have
the Dana's Hovey, Howell, ' Merriam, Sheldon, Tyson,
Lawrence, and many others, either of them more de-
sirable than the Fulton or Gushing ; and in the mean
time scores of native pears have been tested and esti-
mated. At the exhibition of 1829 apples were hardly
mentioned, and at that of 1874 there were less than
half as many dishes as of pears ; yet the remarks made
concerning the pear will apply generally to the apple
also. The show of grapes from under glass probably
varied less widely from those made at the present day (a
single bunch from Mr. Lowell weighed three pounds,
which would be thought large now) ; but native grapes
are not mentioned, and were probably represented only
by the Isabella and Catawba. 2 In no branch of horticul-
year. The original tree in 1848 was very large for a Seckel, — more than six
feet in circumference at one foot from the ground, and thirty feet high. It
was much decayed, so that it was feared it would not stand the hlasts of
many winters ; but in 1S78 it still survived, and fruit from it had been shown
within two years at the exhibitions of the Pennsylvania Horticultural
Society.
1 Mr. Lowell, in 1828, said, that, though it was thirty-three years since
he turned his attention to horticulture, he could enumerate no valuable
table pears the evidence of whose origin in this country was to be deemed
unquestionable, except the Seckel, the Johonnot, the Lewis, the Heath-
cote, and a seedling from Dr. Alfred Baylies of Taunton. The Dix and
others were known but to very few, else they could not have failed to come
under the notice of Mr. Lowell. All these were accidental seedlings.
Probably the first attempt in this country to produce a new fruit by cross-
fertilization was by William Prince, who raised the Prince's St. Germain
from seed of the old St. Germain impregnated by the White Doyenne,
about 1808. While it is true that many of the finest native pears now in
cultivation are accidental productions, the seedlings of Messrs. Dana, Clapp,
and others, are the results of well-conducted experiments; and these, with
the numerous attempts to improve the native grape, both by pure seedlings,
and by crossing with the foreign species, may be ascribed to the direct or
indirect influence of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society.
2 The Isabella grape is said to have originated in South Carolina, and
was introduced to notice by William Prince in 1816. The Catawba was
462 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
ture has a greater advance been made than in the
improvement of the native grape. But it must be
admitted that in 1829 the cultivation of the foreign
grape out-doors was much more successful than now.
though this success continued but a few years. Of the
apricot, Dectarine, and peach, also, specimens were pro-
duced much more freely than now.
We find no mention whatever of vegetables as shown
al the anniversary of 1829; while in 1873, 1874, and
1875, the Society's lower hall was nearly filled with the
finest specimens of the most improved kinds, in great
profusion and variety.
Having compared the earlier exhibitions of the Society
with the later, let us consider how the work accom-
plished by the Society meets the purposes and antici-
pations formed when it was founded. At that time the
cultivation of fruits took precedence in interest over
that of flowers ; and it is to be expected that the near-
est approach to a realization of the views of the found-
ers of the Society should be seen in this department,
and especially in the pear, which has always been the
favorite fruit with the members. We may say that
the work of the Society as respects this fruit has been
measurably accomplished. The work of testing and
election has progressed to that point where all the vari-
eties most desirable for cultivation are well known, and
their characteristics thoroughly ascertained. The devel-
opment of the best specimens in the different varieties
may be said to have approached, if not to have reached,
perfection; and, if any improvement is possible, an
increase in the size of most varieties is certainly not
inrrn.lur,,] before -hat time by Major Adlum, who procured it from a gar-
den in Clarksburg, Md.
IMPROVEMENT IN FRUITS. 463
desirable. 1 In quality we have nothing superior, among
the new varieties, to the White Doyenne, the Brown
Beurre, and the St. Germain, which have been culti-
vated for at least two hundred years, and it is not
probable that we shall obtain any. The Seckel, a unique
variety, may form an exception to this remark ; and
possibly other new types may be produced. But though
we have nothing surpassing those old varieties, which,
whatever theory may be held as to the cause, have
so deteriorated as to be unworthy of cultivation, we
have a much larger number of equally good varie-
ties, extending over a much longer season, to take their
places. We may anticipate as probable, that the best
fruits now in cultivation will ultimately share the fate
of the fine old varieties which have been mentioned;
and it should be the aim of the Society in the future
to encourage the production of new kinds which shall
take their places, as well as to extend the season by the
addition of earlier and later kinds of the highest quality.
What has been said of the pear will apply, to a less
extent, to the apple also. The strawberry and the
native grape have shown an advance, both as to the
number and quality of the varieties, such as could
1 We have not the data for estimating the increase in the size of fruits
exhibited ; but it would doubtless have been more noticeable if it had been
less gradual. A Beurre Bosc weighing twelve and a quarter ounces, exhib-
ited by J. F. Allen in 1850, was thought a very extraordinary specimen; but
in 1S76 twelve fruits of this variety were shown averaging thirteen and one-
half ounces. The Bartletts have not increased to the same extent, or per-
haps culminated earlier. The dish which took the special prize of the
Stanwoocl cup in 1860 weighed eight and a half pounds, and a dish from
Josiah Stickney, in 1862, nine pounds and six ounces; while in 1877, when
the show of this variety was unusually fine, the largest dish weighed but
nine pounds three and a quarter ounces.
The remark in regard to pears that an increase in the size of most varie-
ties is not desirable will apply equally to roses.
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
never have been imagined when the Society was
founded ; and the cultivation of small fruits generally
has increased a hundred fold. As before remarked, the
peach is less easily produced, and the case of the cherry
is similar to that of the peach, while the plum has
become comparatively unknown. But, in spite of these
drawl tacks, the words of President Strong in 1871 are
true, and may be appropriately quoted here : —
-•Largely from Ihc award of prizes by the Society and the
stimulus of honorable competition, has resulted the fact that there
is a wider and more general distribution of the various fruits
among all classes in Eastern Massachusetts than in any other
portion of our country; and possibly we may extend the com-
parison to any country. Of course we do not refer to the exten-
sive orchards in other sections, to local communities of fruit
growers. .,r to the bountiful prodigality of Nature in particular
fruits in favored localities. What we do affirm is this : that our
thousands of freeholds, extending from a quarter of an acre up
to the ample estate, are, to a good degree, supplied with the
various kinds of fruits, and that this is in marked contrast with
the h< niies i n other portions of our country and in Europe. Our
Society has done a most important work in stimulating a general
love of culture and in increasing the extent of planting upon our
small homesteads. Still very much remains to he done, not only
in encouraging a much greater extent in planting, but more espe-
cially in raising the standard of cultivation; for we must not
forget, that, while our exhibitors are most successful in their
products, the majority of cultivators are far behind this high
standard. It is for us continually to demonstrate the possibility
of overcoming tin' seriously increasing evils with which we have
to contend, so that all can attain the same success. Who can
estimate the elevating influence, and the stability which would be
given to the laboring classes, by thus beautifying their homes, and
strengthening their local attachments?"
In the department of plants and flowers, which
includes a far greater number of species than that of
NEW VEGETABLES INTRODUCED. 465
fruits, — indeed, taking for its province almost the
whole vegetable kingdom, — we cannot expect to find
even an approach to completeness at any point. Yet
the number of plants collected in our gardens and
greenhouses, the new varieties originated or introduced,
and the improvements in cultivation, must be far beyond
any thing ever imagined by the founders of the Society.
The first premium list published, however, indicates one
point in which we have not yet attained to their hopes.
Premiums were offered for the most successful cultiva-
tion of the American Holly, the Magnolia glauca, the
Rhododendron maximum, and the Kalmia latifolia ; but
the cultivation of these plants has never become gen-
eral, though it may be expected that the rhododendron
show, designed to promote the cultivation of that plant,
will have that effect ; and there are indications that
the deep interest now shown in collecting and exhibit-
ing native plants will soon lead to their more general
cultivation.
Few new species of vegetables have been introduced
since the formation of the Society ; but the varieties
have been multiplied and improved a hundred fold.
As an example, we may take the squash. The only
variety for which a premium was offered on the first list
was the Winter Crookneck. The rhubarb and tomato,
which were not even mentioned, have become universal
necessities. It is unnecessary to do more than to allude
here to the development of the potato, which has been
so often mentioned in the preceding pages.
" The founders and early members of the Society had
enlarged views for its usefulness. Some of their fond
expectations, such as experimental gardens, a school of
botany and horticulture, monthly publications of essays
466 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
and facts, are projects which have not been realized.
On the other hand, it is true that our exhibitions have
become more extensive, and their influence has been
more pervading and powerful than the most sanguine
could have expected." 1
It will be evident that the Society, in its purpose to
introduce into this country fruits, flowers, and vegetables
of the highest character in other lands, to test their
merits, their value, and the best method of cultivating
them in this climate, and then to issue them with its
approval for cultivation, has succeeded beyond its high-
est expectations, and has thereby disseminated a vast
amount of healthy and profitable enjoyment, and added
much to the resources of the tiller of the soil. But, as
it proceeded, a much higher aim developed itself: this
was to encourage the attempt to raise native fruits, flow-
ers, and vegetables, of as great if not greater excellence
than any which could be introduced from other coun-
tries, and better adapted to our climate. The work of
originating such varieties makes but slow and gradual
progress, and requires not only a good stock of patience
and hope, but the application of fixed rules, the result
of study and observation, as well as constant stimula-
tion and encouragement. To afford this stimulus the
prospective prizes of the Society were established ; and
though the various awards of these prizes, made from
time to time, have been recorded in these pages, it
may bo well to bring together here the Hovey cherry,
the Jenny Lind and President Wilder strawberries, the
Dana's Hovey and Clapp's Favorite pears, the Moore's
Early grape, the C. M. Hovey camellia, the Lilium
Parkmanni, the Daisy Rand rhododendron, and the
1 President Strong's Address, 1873.
THE EXHIBITIONS OF THE SOCIETY. 467
Davis's Seedling and Early Rose potatoes, on which the
Society has, by means of these prizes, placed the stamp
of its approval. Many less important products have re-
ceived awards proportioned to their value. And, besides
thus adding to our stock these improved varieties, the
Society has been the means of shedding light on the
principles governing their production, and especially of
proving the fallacy of the idea, formerly entertained, that
seedlings from the improved varieties of pears and other
fruits revert to a wild state, and of showing, that, while
it may be difficult to produce a distinct variety of supe-
rior merit, it is easy to produce kinds possessing many
excellent characteristics.
No society has held a higher standard in estimating
the quality of the productions submitted to its judgment,
or exercised a severer taste in regard to the designs
exhibited. Nor has any society been more careful to
discard all extraneous assistance, or to avoid any attrac-
tions other than those connected with horticulture, in its
exhibitions ; and to this course may be largely attribut-
ed the success which has constantly attended its shows.
The exhibitions of the Society, bringing together the
most beautiful productions of the earth, have been a
source of refined enjoyment to all who have beheld
them, and, if they had had no other end than to afford
such pleasure, they would have recompensed the Society
for all the labor and expense incurred. But to take
only this view of them would be doing the Society great
injustice. They should be looked at as opportunities for
instruction to all who visit them, and as the indices of
improvements in the gardens of exhibiters. Exclusive
attention may, however, have been bestowed by the
successful competitor for a premium upon one produc-
468 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
tion ; and he may thereby have been enabled to bear
aw; iv the prize for superiority from one whose garden
was a pattern of scientific cultivation, neatness, and
economy in management. The Society has, therefore,
by its committees, gone into the gardens of its members
and of others, and examined them as to the excellence
of cultivation, neatness in keeping, and economy in
management, and awarded its prizes for superiority in
these respects.
But horticulture includes more than the finest fruits
and flowers and the neatest and most skilful cultivation.
" Horticulture in its most comprehensive sense," said
Hon. Robert C. Winthrop in his speech at the anni-
versary of the Society in 1848, "is emphatically the fine
art of common life. It is eminently a republican fine
art. It distributes its productions with equal hand to
the rich and the poor. Its implements may be wielded
by every arm, and its results appreciated by every eye.
It decorates the dwelling of the humblest laborer with
undoubted originals by the oldest masters, and places
within his daily view fruit pieces such as Van Huysum
never painted, and landscapes such as Poussin could
only copy." The daily sight of fine fruits and flowers
and vegetables must educate the taste, and inspire a love
for all that is beautiful in nature or art; and the Society
in its award of prizes for bouquets, baskets of flowers,
and floral designs, has done so much to promote a true
taste, that Boston may claim a position in advance of
any other city in the United States in this respect. But
it is in landscape gardening that horticulture most truly
rises to the dignity of a fine art. The founders of the
Society did not lose sight of this branch of the art of
horticulture, and it was intended that the garden and
LANDSCAPE GARDENING. 469
cemetery at Mount Auburn should ultimately offer an
example of landscape or picturesque gardening. But
when the connection of the Society with Mount Auburn
was severed, little could be done directly for the ad-
vancement of gardening as a fine art, except by the
offer of prizes for the best application of taste and skill
in laying out grounds. The inducements offered by the
Society were afterwards enlarged by the donation, from
a gentleman whose own grounds form one of the best
examples of landscape gardening to be found in the
United States, of a fund for the dissemination of a more
refined taste for elegant rural improvement. Thus the
purpose of the Society has been fulfilled, not only in
Mount Auburn and other cemeteries, but in the private
grounds of many members of the Society and others,
which, as the finest specimens of art, with their beauti-
ful lawns, and rare trees, shrubs, and other plants, so
disposed as to produce the best effects, present the
strongest attractions either to residents here or to visit-
ors from abroad.
The Society has sought the promotion of horticulture
by diffusing information on the subject through its pub-
lications, and by collecting a horticultural library, of
both which we have fully spoken in a previous chapter.
But it may also claim no small influence in creating a
horticultural literature suited to the peculiar circum-
stances of our country, where formerly only European
works could be found. Previously to the formation of
the Society there was not a horticultural journal in the
United States ; but a few years after two were estab-
lished in the city of Boston, one of which was con-
tinued for thirty-four years. These, with the books
written by the members, and the articles prepared by
470 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
them for horticultural and agricultural journals, would
form a valuable horticultural library. And it is not too
much to say that the influence of the Massachusetts
Horticultural Society, exerted through its exhibitions,
its prizes, its discussions, publications, and library, has,
more than any or all other causes, been the means of
so improving the gardens and pleasure grounds around
the city of Boston, as to make its suburbs, by general
acknowledgment, more beautiful than those of any
other American city. But its influence has not rested
here. Its publications have been freely distributed
among all interested in horticulture. Its library has,
with equal liberality, been opened to visitors from far
or near ; and, of the hundreds of exhibitions held, there
have probably been few unvisited by persons residing
beyond the limits of Massachusetts. To those who con-
stantly witness these comparisons of our products, they
may come to have some appearance of sameness, yet
they are ever fresh, and ever exerting a wide influence
upon the public. The stimulus which has been given
by our weekly and annual gatherings has resulted in an
impress, more or less marked, upon almost every New
England home.
The influence of the Massachusetts Horticultural
Society is shown in the improvement of the markets of
Boston and other cities and towns in New England. At
the time of the formation of the Society the number
of varieties of fruits and vegetables to be found in our
markets was small, and the quality inferior; while
flowers and flowering plants were hardly thought of as
articles of commerce. Not every new variety is adapted
to cultivation for the market ; but such as are soon find
their way there : and, as a consequence, when we pass
IMPROVEMENT IN THE MARKETS. 471
through the markets, or walk the streets, we find fruits
and vegetables of the best varieties, and giving proof of
the highest cultivation, displayed in tempting profusion ;
while the many florists' stores are filled with flowers of
every description, from the choicest productions of the
hothouse to those more easily grown, but not less beau-
tiful, which enable all to enjoy what were formerly con-
sidered luxuries for the rich alone. The part which
the Society has taken in producing this abundance is
attested by the most popular of all pears, the Bartlett,
bearing the name of one who was chosen a vice-presi-
dent at the first election. Equal progress has been
matte in extending the season of fine fruits and vege-
tables, both by the skill of the gardener in forcing, and
by the introduction of varieties of earlier and later
maturity. The taste for fruit has increased ; so that to
satisfy it large quantities are brought from more south-
ern climates, where it can be produced earlier, as with
the strawberry, or from regions better adapted to the
growth of certain species, such as the peach and the
grape ; and thus the horticulture of distant parts of our
country has been stimulated. The skill of our cultiva-
tors is testified by the fact, that, to some extent, they
have made return in then own productions for those of
more favored climates ; and the markets of New York
have been largely supplied with lettuce forced by Bos-
ton gardeners ; while the orders received by our florists
from still more distant parts of the country bear wit-
ness to their taste and skill. The thousands of trees
and plants of every description, both fruit-bearing and
ornamental, and the quantities of seeds of every kind
sold in the nurseries, stores, and markets, show a con-
dition of horticulture in the stongest contrast with that
472 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
in 1822, when the Hon. John Lowell wrote, "We are
utterly destitute, in New England, of nurseries for fruit
trees on an extensive scale. We have no cultivators on
whom we can rely for a supply of the most common
plants of the smaller fruits, such as strawberries, goose-
berries, and raspberries of the superior kinds ; we have
no place to which we can go for plants to ornament our
grounds; we have not a single seedsman who can
always furnish us with fresh seeds of annual flowers on
which we can place a reliance." Yet it would appear
that the condition of horticulture in this country, even
where most improved, was not, on the whole (however
it may have been in regard to nursery and seed estab-
lishments), better than here; for Mr. Lowell, writing
in 1831, said, » Horticulture was an advanced art in the
North when it was unknown in the South, and but
imperfectly in the Middle States. It is equally true
now. Massachusetts is far before New York and Penn-
sylvania in horticulture, if you take into view the
improved state of private gardens, the number of its
green and grape houses, and the beauty of its country
seats. There do not exist in the whole range of the
United States more finely cultivated . or highly orna-
mented country residences than this ancient State can
show. The precedence then taken has continued, and
we may say in one word what we believe will be
admitted by all, that horticulture as an art is more
advanced in Massachusetts, and especially in the vicinity
of Boston, than anywhere else in the United States.
lnis is not due to any natural advantages, for in climate
and soil our State is less favored than most others ; but
it may rather be ascribed to these less favorable circum-
stances, necessitating more skilful and thorough cul-
HORTICULTURE THE PERFECTION OF AGRICULTUEE. 473
ture, for which the needed stimulus and encouragement
has been furnished by the Massachusetts Horticultural
Society. We need not enlarge on the beneficial effect
which the Society has exerted in educating the bodies,
the minds, the tastes, and the morals of individuals and
the community, or its untold influence in diffusing gen-
eral happiness : a mere allusion to these points will
suffice.
In the historical sketch with which this volume com-
mences, we have seen that agriculture, providing for
the necessaries of man, precedes horticulture, which
ministers to his luxuries : indeed it may be said that
agriculture is the parent of horticulture. But as culti-
vation improved, the preliminary experiments with ferti-
lizers, the experiments in grafting, budding, and other
methods of propagation, and the selection of the fine
fruits which fill the orchards of our farmers, were made
in the garden, and many other of the most valuable prod-
ucts of agriculture were first introduced, and their
qualities tested in the garden. Thus has the child
repaid its obligation to the parent. Horticulture is the
perfection of agriculture ; and as population increases,
and with it the necessity for more careful cultivation,
we may expect, that under the influence of this and
kindred societies, and the agencies set in motion by
them, all the operations of agriculture will ultimately
be performed with the precision, nicety, and refinement
of horticulture, until the whole world shall become a
garden.
APPENDIX.
A. Page 63.
AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE MASSACHUSETTS
HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Section 1 . Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Repre-
sentatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the
same, That Zebedee Cook, Jr., Robert L. Emmons, William
Worthington, B. V. French, John B. Russell, J. R. Newell, Chee-
ver Newhall, and Thomas G. Fessenden, their Associates and Suc-
cessors, be and they hereby are incorporated under the name and
by the description of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, for
the purpose of encouraging and improving the science and practice
of Horticulture, and promoting the amelioration of the various
species of trees, fruits, plants, and vegetables, and the introduc-
tion of new species and varieties ; with power to make b} T -laws not
inconsistent with the Laws of the Commonwealth, for the regula-
tion of said Society, and the management of the same and of its
concerns ; to receive donations, bequests, and devises for promot-
ing the objects of said Societ} T ; to lay and collect assessments on
the Members, not exceeding two dollars per annum ; to enforce the
payment of such assessments by action for the same ; to purchase
and hold real estate to the amount of ten thousand dollars, and
personal estate to the amount of twenty thousand dollars ; to elect
a Treasurer, Secretar}', and other officers, — the appointment of
which shall be provided for in the by-laws of said Society ; the
meeting for the election of such officers to be called at the times
and in the manner provided in such by-laws ; to empower the
President, Directors, Comptrollers, Treasurer, Committees, or
475
476 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
other Officers or Members, or any Attorneys, Agents, or Represen-
tatives of said Society, to transact the business, manage and apply
the funds, discharge the functions, and promote the objects there-
of ; to authorize any of the Members or Officers of said Society to
till vacancies in the various offices of the same that may happen in
the intervals between the meetings of the Members for choosing
Officers ; and to commence and defend suits.
Sect. 2. Be it further enacted, That in case the said Corpo-
ration shall at any time contract debts beyond their means and
ability to pay at the time of contracting the same, the Officers or
other Agents of said Corporation so contracting such debts shall
be personally liable for the same.
Sect. 3. Be it further enacted, That any Member of said Cor-
poration may cease to be a Member thereof, by giving notice to
that effect to the President, Treasurer, Secretary, or other Officers,
and paying the amount due from him to the Society.
Sect. 4. Be it further enacted, That the first meeting of the
Members of said Corporation may be called by any two or more
of the persons named in the first section, by giving one week's
notice, or more by advertisement in any newspaper printed in
Boston.
Sect. 5. Be it further enacted, That this Act may be altered
or repealed at the discretion of the Legislature.
Approved June 12, 1829.
The Acts in addition to this Act (other than those relating to
Mount Auburn, which will be found in Appendix D) are, —
1. An Act authorizing the purchase and holding of real estate
to the amountrof fifty thousand dollars, approved February 5,
1844.
2. An Act authorizing the purchase and holding of real estate
to the amount of one hundred thousand dollars, approved April 25,
1853.
3. An Act authorizing the holding of real estate to the amount
of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, approved March 4, 1863.
STANDING COMMITTEES, 1829. 477
B. Page 66.
STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE COUNCIL, CHOSEN
MAECH 24, 1829.
ON FRUIT TREES, FRUITS, ETC.
To have charge of whatever relates to the multiplication of fruit
trees and vines by seed, scions, buds, layers, suckers, or other
modes ; the introduction of new varieties ; the various methods of
pruning and training them, and whatever relates to their culture
and that of all other fruits ; the recommendation of objects for
premiums and the awarding of them.
Elias Phinney, Chairman.
Samuel Downer.
Oliver Fiske.
Robert Manning.
Charles Senior.
II.
ON THE CULTURE AND PRODUCTS OF THE KITCHEN GARDEN.
To have charge of whatever relates to the location and man-
agement of kitchen gardens ; the cultivation of all plants apper-
taining thereto ; the introduction of new varieties of esculent,
medicinal, and all such vegetables as are useful in the arts, or are
subservient to other branches of national industry ; the structure
and management of hotbeds ; 'the recommendation of objects for
premiums and the awarding of them.
Jacob Tidd, Chairman.
Samuel Ward.
Aaron D. Williams.
John B. Russell.
III.
ON ORNAMENTAL TREES, SHRUBS, FLOWERS, AND GREENHOUSES.
To have charge of whatever relates to the culture, multiplica-
tion, and preservation of ornamental trees and shrubs, and flowers
478 m \S8ACnUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
of all kinds ; the construction and management of greenhouses, the
recommendation of objects for premiums and the awarding of them.
Robert L. Emmons, Chairman.
Jonathan Winship.
Joseph G. Joy.
William Carter.
IV.
ON THE LIBRARY.
To have charge of all books, drawings, and engravings, and to
recommend from time to time such as it may be deemed expedient
to procure; to superintend the publication of such communications
and papers as may be directed by the council; to recommend pre-
miums for drawings of fruits and flowers, and plans of country
houses, and other edifices and structures connected with horticul-
ture ; and for communications on any subject in relation thereto.
II. A. S. Dearborn, Chairman.
John C. Gray.
Jacob Bigelow.
T. W. Harris.
COMMITTEE ON THE SYNONYMES OP FRUITS.
.At a meeting of the Society, June 20, 1829, the following gen-
tlemen were chosen a committee to facilitate an interchange of
fruits with the Philadelphia, New York, and Albany Horticultural
Societies, and others, for the purpose of establishing their svno-
n3'mes. J
John Lowell, Chairman.
Samuel G. Perkins.
Samuel Downer.
0. Page 80.
NAMES OF SUBSCRIBERS FOR THE FIRST HUNDRED LOTS
IN MOUNT AUBURN.
George Bond.
Samuel Whitwell.
Benjamin Adams.
1 taniel Denny.
C. Frederick Adams.
Dennis Brigham.
Henry Rice.
B. B. Grant.
FIRST OWNERS OF LOTS IN MOUNT AUBURN.
479
Isaac Livermore.
James Read.
Samuel F. Coolidge.
Benjamin F. White.
Samuel G. Williams.
Francis J. Oliver.
William Lawrence.
Amos Lawrence.
J. B. Brown.
Henry B. Stone.
Howard & Mexry.
Zebedee Cook, jun.
Abbott Lawrence.
Nathan Appleton.
George W. Pratt.
B. A. Gould.
Joseph P. Bradlee.
II. A. S. Dearborn, Roxbury.
Samuel Walker, Roxbury.
Samuel Pond, Cambridge.
William Stanwood.
Abijah White, Watertown.
E. W. Payne.
James T. Austin.
George W. Brimmer.
John Davis.
Frederic Tudor.
John Randall.
William Ingalls.
Daniel Davis.
Charles P. Curtis.
Thomas B. Curtis.
Joseph Story.
Samuel Appleton.
Charles Lowell.
Jacob Bigelow.
Edward Everett.
Franklin Dexter.
John Picrpont.
Charles Tappan.
Alpheus Gary.
John Farrar.
Joseph Baker.
Thomas Wiley.
Robert Farley.
Joseph Coolidge.
L. M. Sargent.
J. II. Thayer.
Joseph T. Buckminster.
Thomas B. Wales.
Benjamin Bussey.
J. P. Rice.
Charles Wells.
Thomas II. Perkins, jun.
James Davis.
Josiah Loring.
George II. Kuhn.
David Eckley.
John Lemist, Roxbury.
Supply C. Thwing, Roxbury.
David A. Simmons, Roxbury.
James Boyd.
George W. Coffin.
Francis Parkman.
Rufus Wyman.
George C. Shattuck.
Edwin Buckingham.
Henderson Inches.
Isaac McLellan.
Z. B. Adams.
Richard Fletcher.
Deming Jarves.
Jared Sparks.
Robert G. Shaw.
Josiah Quincy.
Elizabeth Cragie, Cambridge.
Henry Ware.
Benjamin Waterhouse.
Charles Folsom, Cambridge.
Charles Ilickling, Roxbury.
John C. Gray.
Joseph B. Joy.
Zachariah Hicks.
480 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Those whose residence is not noted were, so far as is known,
residents of Boston, though there were probably a few besides
those noted who did not live in Boston.
D. Pages 80 and 110.
ACT AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RURAL
CEMETERY BY THE MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL
SOCIETY.
Section 1 . Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Represen-
tatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same,
That the Massachusetts. Horticultural Society be, and hereby are,
authorized, in addition to the powers already conferred on them, to
dedicate and appropriate ain* part of the real estate now owned or
hereafter to be purchased by them, as and for a rural cemetery or
burying ground, and for the erection of tombs, cenotaphs, or other
monuments, for or in memory of the dead ; and for this purpose,
to lay out the same in suitable lots or other subdivisions, for fam-
ily and other burying places ; and to plant and embellish the same
with shrubbery, flowers, trees, walks, and other rural ornaments,
and to enclose and divide the same with proper walls and enclos-
ures, and to make and annex thereto other suitable appendages
anil conveniences, as the Society shall from time to time deem
expedient. And whenever the said Society shall so lay out and
appropriate any of their real estate for a cemetery or burying
ground as aforesaid, the same shall lie deemed a perpetual dedica-
tion thereof for the purposes aforesaid ; and the real estate so ded-
icated shall lie forever held by -the said Society in trust for such
purposes and for none other. And the said Society shall have
authority to grant and convey to any person or persons, the sole
and exclusive right of burial, and of erecting tomhs, cenotaphs,
and other monuments, in any such designated lots and subdivisions,
upon such terms and conditions, and subject to such regulations, as
the -aid Society shall, by their by-laws and regulations, prescribe.
And every right so granted and conveyed shall be held for the pur-
poses aforesaid, and for none other, as real estate by the proprie-
tor or proprietors thereof, and shall not be subject to attachment
or execution.
ACT TO ESTABLISH A KURAL CEMETERY. 481
Sect. 2. Be it further enacted, That for the purposes of this
act, the said Society shall be and hereby are authorized to purchase
and hold any real estate not exceeding ten thousand dollars in
value, in addition to the real estate which they are now by law
authorized to purchase and hold. And to enable the said Society
more effectually to cany the plan aforesaid into effect, and to pro-
vide funds for the same ; the said Society shall be, and hereb}* are
authorized to open subscription books, upon such terms, condi-
tions, and regulations, as the said Society shall prescribe, which
shall be deemed fundamental and perpetual articles between the
said Society and the subscribers.. And every person who shall
become a subscriber in conformit}' thereto shall be deemed a mem-
ber for life of the said Societ}', without the pa}*ment of an}' other
assessment whatsoever, and shall moreover be entitled, in fee
simple, to the sole and exclusive right of using as a place of burial
and of erecting tombs, cenotaphs, and other monuments, in such
lot or subdivision of such cemetery or burying ground, as shall, in
conformity to such fundamental articles be assigned to him.
Sect. 3. Be it further enacted, That the President of the said
Society shall have authority to call any special meeting or meetings
of the said Society, at such time and place as he shall direct, for
the purpose of carrying into effect any or all the purposes of this
act, or any other purposes within the purview of the original act
to which this act is in addition.
Approved June 23, 1831.
ACT SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE PRECEDING.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in
General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as
folloivs : —
Section 1. That any person who shall wilfully destroy, muti-
late, deface, injure, or remove any tomb, monument, grave-stone,
or other structure placed in memory of the dead ; or any fence,
railing, or other work for the protection or ornament of any tomb,
monument, grave-stone, or other structure aforesaid, or of any
cemetery lot within the limits of the Garden and Cemetery of
Mount Auburn, in the county of Middlesex; or shall wilfully
destroy, remove, cut, break, or injure any tree, shrub, or plant with-
in the limits of the said Garden and Cemetery, or shall shoot or
482 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
discharge any lire-arm within the said limits, he shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall upon conviction thereof liefore
any justice of the peace, or other court of competent jurisdiction,
be punished by a fine not less than five dollars, nor more than fifty
dollars, according to the nature and aggravation of the offence :
and such offender shall also be liable in an action of trespass, to be
brought against him in the name of the Massachusetts Horticultu-
ral Society, to pay all such damages as shall have been occasioned
by his unlawful act or acts, which money, when recovered, shall be
applied by the said Society, under the direction of the garden and
cemetery committee, to the reparation and restoration of the prop-
erty destroyed or injured as above ; and members of the said Soci-
ety shall be competent witnesses in such suits.
Sect. 2. Be it farther enacted, That any person owning a
cemetery lot, containing not less than three hundred square feet,
shall be a member of the Massachusetts Horticultural Societ}- so
long as he continues to own the same. And upon the death of any
such proprietor, the devisee of such lot, or the heir at law, as the
case may be, shall be entitled to all the privileges of membership
as aforesaid ; and if there be more than one devisee or heir at law
of such lot, the garden and cemetery committee of the said Society,
for the time being, shall designate which of the said devisees or
heirs at law shall represent the said lot, and vote in the meetings
of the Society, which designation shall continue in force, until, by
death, removal, or other sufficient cause, another shall become
necessary ; and in making such designation the said committee
shall, as far as they conveniently may, give the preference to males
over females, and to proximity of blood, and seniority of age, hav-
ing due regard, however, to vicinity of residence.
Sect. 3. Be it further enacted. That it shall be lawful for the
saiil Society to take and hold an}' grant, donation, or bequest of
property upon trust, to apply the income thereof, under the direc-
tion of the garden and cemetery committee, for the improvement
or embellishment of the said cemetery, or of the garden adjacent
thereto, or of any buildings, structures, or fences, erected or to be
erected upon the lands of the Society, or of any individual proprie-
tor of a lot in the cemetery, or for the repair, preservation, or
renewal of any tomb, monument, grave-stone, fence or railing, or
other erection in or around any cemetery lot, or for the planting and
cultivation of trees, shrubs, or plants, in or around any cemetery
ACTS TO INCORPORATE MOUNT AUBURN. 483
lot, according to the terms of the grant or bequest. And the su-
preme judicial court, and any other court having equity jurisdiction,
shall have power to compel the due performance of the said trusts,
upon a bill filed by a proprietor of any lot in the said cemetery.
Approved March 21, 1834.
E. Page 111.
AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE PROPRIETORS OF THE
CEMETERY AT MOUNT AUBURN.
Section 10. Be it further enacted asfolloius: — First, that the
present proprietors of lots in the said Cemetery, who shall become
members of the corporation created bj T this act shall thenceforth
cease to be members of the said Horticultural Society, so far as
their membership therein depends on their being proprietors of lots
in the said Cemetery. Secondly, that the sales of the Cemetery
lots shall continue to be made as fast as it is practicable by the
corporation created by this act, at a price not less than the sum of
sixty dollars for every lot containing three hundred square feet,
and so in proportion for any greater or less quantity , unless the
said Horticultural Society, and the corporation created by this' act,
shall mutually agree to sell the same at a less price. Thirdly,
that the proceeds of the first sales of such lots, after deducting the
annual expenses of the Cemetery establishment, shall be applied to
the extinguishment of the present debts due b} r the said Horticul-
tural Society on account of the said Garden and Cemetery, and
after the extinguishment of the said debts, the balance of the said
proceeds, and the proceeds of all future sales, shall annually, on
the first Monday in ever}' year, be divided between the said Horti-
cultural Society and the corporation created by this act, in manner
following, namery ; fourteen hundred dollars shall be first deducted
from the gross proceeds of sales of lots, during the preceding year,
for the purpose of defraying the superintendent's salary and other
incidental expenses of the Cemeter} r establishment, and the residue
of the said gross proceeds shall be divided between the said Horti-
cultural Society, and the corporation created by this act, as fol-
lows, namely : one fourth part thereof shall be received b}' and
paid over to the said Horticultural Society, on the first Monday of
484 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
January of every year, and the remaining three fourths parts shall
be retained and held by the corporation created by*this act to their
own use forever. And if the sales of any year shall he less than
fourteen hundred dollars, then the deficiency shall be a charge on
the sales of the succeeding year or years. Fourthly, the rnone} - so
received by the said Horticultural Society, shall be forever devoted
and applied by the said Society, to the purposes of an experimental
garden, and to promote the art and science of horticulture, and for
no other purpose. And the money so retained by the corporation
created by this act, shall be forever devoted and applied to the
preservation, improvement, embellishment and enlargement of the
said Cemetery and Garden, and the incidental expenses thereof,
and for no other purpose whatsoever. Fifthly, a committee of the
said Horticultural Society, duly appointed for this purpose, shall,
on the first Monday of January, of every year, have a right to
inspect and examine the books and accounts of the treasurer, or
other officer acting as treasurer of the corporation created by this
act, as far as may be necessary to ascertain the sales of lots of the
preceding year.
Approved March 31, 1835.
F. Page 114.
AN INDENTURE OF TWO PARTS, MADE THIS EIGHTEENTH
DAY OF DECEMBER, A.D. EIGHTEEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY
EIGHT, BY AND BETWEEN THE MASSACHUSETTS HORTI-
CULTURAL SOCIETY OF THE FIRST PART, VXD THE PRO-
PRIETORS OF THE CEMETERY OF MOUNT AUBURN OF
THE SECOND PART.
Whereas differences have for some time past existed between
the Massachusetts Horticultural Society and the Proprietors of
the Cemetery of Mount Auburn, the consideration of which, by the
action of the said corporations respectively, was referred to a Com-
mittee of Conference, composed of members of each of the said
corporations, in the hope that measures might be devised for an
amicable adjustment of all differences:
And whereas the said committee, after a full and careful consid-
eration of all the matters thus referred to them, agreed upon a plan
for the complete adjustment of all differences and the final settle-
INDENTURE WITH MOUNT AUBURN. 485
ment of all questions between the said corporations, which plan
was embodied in a report made to both of the said corporations,
which Report is in the words following :
Whereas the Massachusetts Horticultural Society have, accord-
ing to the provisions of the act of incorporation of the Proprietors
of Mount Auburn Cemetery, a just claim for one fourth part of the
proceeds of sales of lots in the present Cemetery, after deducting
fourteen hundred dollars yearly for expenses :
And whereas the said Horticultural Society also claim a like pro-
portion of the proceeds of sales of any lauds which ma}* be annexed
to the present Cemeteiy for the purpose of enlarging the same,
which claim however is denied by the said Proprietors :
And whereas the said Horticultural Society also claim one
fourth part of the proceeds of single interments heretofore made
from time to time in certain public lots, the fee of which is still in
the said Proprietors :
And whereas certain lands adjacent to the present Cemetery
have been purchased by the said Proprietors, for the purpose of
annexing them to the said Cemetery as an enlargement thereof, —
and it in ay also be found desirable, at some future time, further to
enlarge the said Cemeteiy :
. And whereas the said Horticultural Society are willing to bear
their proportional part of the cost of the lands already purchased,
and of such as shall hereafter be purchased, and of the cost of
enclosing the same — and are also willing to bear their proportional
part of the extra expenses which may hereafter be incurred in the
reclaiming and filling up such parts of the said Cemetery, as it now
exists or ma}* hereafter be enlarged, as would otherwise be unsala-
ble or unfit for purposes of burial : —
Now, therefore, with a view to effect an equitable settlement of
all questions, and to prevent future doubts and difficulties between
the parties concerned, and to perpetuate the friendly relations
existing between the said societies, the Committee of Conference
recommend the adoption of the following arrangement between the.
two corporations :
First, The said Horticultural Society shall pay to the said Pro-
prietors of Mount Auburn Cemetery one full fourth part of the cost
of all lands lying south of Mount Auburn Street in Cambridge,
heretofore purchased by the said Proprietors for an enlargement of
486 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
the original Cemetery convoyed to the said Proprietors by the said
Society, estimating such cost at fifteen hundred dollars per acre,
and lidding thereto interest to be compounded half yearly from
April 17, 1854, taxes and other charges incurred in acquiring the
title of the said lands, and all moneys already expended in im-
proving the said lands and repairing the buildings thereon, first
deducting all rents and income derived therefrom, with compound
interest thereon.
Second, The said Horticultural Society shall pay one fourth
part of the expense of enclosing the additional lands already pur-
chased, in a manner corresponding with the present Cemetery,
whenever the same shall be done; and shall also in case of any
future enlargement of the said Cemetery, pay their proportion,
one fourth part, of the cost of any lands purchased for that pur-
pose, and one fourth of the expense of enclosing the same.
Third, In the settlement for lands already purchased the said
Horticultural Society shall be credited with the sum of one hundred
and twenty-five dollars, being one fourth the amount received by
the said Proprietors for their interest in the dower estate of Mrs.
Pomroy (originally conveyed to the said Proprietors by the said
Society) , with compound interest thereon from December 20, 1844.
Fourth, The proceeds of sales of lots, both in the present
Cemetery, and also in the lands already purchased, or which may
hereafter be purchased as an enlargement of the said Cemeterv,
shall be divided, according to the terms of the act of incorporation
of the said Proprietors, between the two corporations, after deduct-
ing fourteen hundred dollars ($1,400) yearly, to be retained by
the said Proprietors for expenses, in the proportion of one fourth
to the said Society and three fourths to the said Proprietors.
Fifth. The Horticultural Society shall release the said Proprie-
tors from all claims for any part of the proceeds of single interments
prior to the first day of January. 1859, and from and after that
time the proceeds of all such interments shall be divided between
Hie two corporations in the same proportions in which the sales of
lot- are to be divided.
Sixth, When lands otherwise unsalable or unfit for purposes of
burial shall he tilled up and improved, the cost of such filling up
•'Mid improvement shall firsl he deducted from the proceeds of sales
of such lands, and one fourth of the residue shall be paid to the
Horticultural Society — provided the amount of such residue shall
INDENTURE WITH MOUNT AUBURN. 487
never be less than the current price of land in the Cemetery, which
is now fifty cents per square foot, except that intermediate spaces
between lots, when not intended for burial, may be sold for six-
teen and two thirds cents per square foot.
Seventh, In case the said Proprietors shall hereafter build re •
ceiving tombs, catacombs, or columbaria, the Horticultural Society
shall pay their proportion (one fourth) of the cost thereof, and
shall be entitled to one fourth of the amounts received for inter-
ments therein.
Eighth, The necessary releases and indentures to carry into
effect the foregoing arrangement shall be made and executed by
and between the said parties ; but the terms of the act of incor-
poration of the said Proprietors, so far as they regulate the rela-
tions between the two corporations, shall not be otherwise altered.
The Committee of Conference further recommend, that the
amount which, under the foregoing arrangement, will be due from
the Horticultural Society to the Proprietors of Mount Auburn Cem-
etery, be paid as follows, viz. : the said Proprietors shall retain,
from the yearly amounts to which the Horticultural Society shall be
entitled upon the division of the proceeds of sales, one full half
part, until the whole indebtedness of the said Society shall be dis-
charged, with yearly interest ; the said Horticultural Society, how-
ever, reserving the right to pay the whole or any part of the said
sum, at any time.
JACOB BIGELOW,
EDWARD S. RAND,
For the Committee.
And whereas the said Report has been adopted by the said Hor-
ticultural Society and by the Trustees of the said Proprietors, and
whereas it is found, upon a careful computation upon the basis
agreed on in the said Report, there will be due from the said Society
to the said Proprietors, on the first day of January next, the sum
of nine thousand and eight ^ dollars :
Now therefore, in order to carry into effect the recommendations
of the said Report the said Massachusetts Horticultural Society
and the said Proprietors of the Cemetery of Mount Auburn, in
consideration of the covenants hereby mutually entered into, and
of one dollar by each to the other paid, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, do hereby covenant and agree, each with
the other, in manner following : —
488 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
First, That the said Cemetery as now existing, and situated
south of the street called Mount Auburn Street in Cambridge,
together with the lands already purchased as an enlargement
thereof, and all additions which shall hereafter he made to the
same, shall he held by the said Proprietors ; and the entire con-
trol, management, and direction of the same, and of all works
and improvements therein, and expenditures thereon, shall be and
remain in the said Proprietors and their officers, in as full and
complete a manner as the same are now vested in and intrusted to
them, by an act of Legislature incorporating the said Proprietors,
passed on the thirty-first day of March, A.D. eighteen hundred
and thirty-live.
Second, The yearly proceeds of all sales of lands in the said
Cemetery, as it now exists or may hereafter be enlarged, together
with all amounts received for single interments in any public lots
or receiving tombs, after the deduction of fourteen hundred dollars
therefrom, to he retained by the said Proprietors for the purposes
stated in said act, shall, on the first Monday in every year, be
divided between the said Proprietors and the said Horticultural
Society, according to the terms of the said act. in the following
proportions, viz. : three fourths to the said Proprietors and one
fourth to the said Society ; and the said Proprietors shall at such
time render to the said Society a just and true account of all sales
made, and of all moneys received by them for such lands and
interments during the preceding year, and shall furnish all such
vouchers and evidence in regard to the same as the said Society
may reasonably require.
Third, The sum of nine thousand eight and T \\ dollars which,
on the first day of January next will be due and owing from the
said Horticultural Society to the said Proprietors, shall be paid in
manner following, viz. : the said Proprietors shall have the right
to retain out of the amount which, under the provisions of the
preceding article, will yearly and in each year be due and payable
to the said Society, one full half part thereof of the amount so
payable, which part so retained shall be applied first to. the pay-
ment of the yearly interest on the said sum, or on such part as
shall remain unpaid, and the residue to the reduction and final
extinguishment of the said debt, until the same shall be fully paid
and discharged. Provided, however, that the said Society shall
have the right to pay the whole or any part of the said sum at
any time.
INDENTURE WITH MOUNT AUBURN. 489
Fourth, The said Society hereby covenants with the said Proprie-
tors that whenever the said Proprietors shall enclose the lands
already purchased, in a manner corresponding with the present
Cemetery, or otherwise, as they shall see fit, they will pay to the
said Proprietors one fourth part of the cost thereof, and in like
manner in case of any future additions to and enlargement of the
Cemetery, they will pay to the said Proprietors one fourth part of
the cost of enclosing the same, whenever such enclosure shall be
completed, the time and manner of making sueh enclosure to be at
the discretion of the said Proprietors.
Fifth, Whenever lands otherwise unsalable or unfit for purposes
of burial, shall be filled up and improved, the cost of such filling
up and improvement shall first be deducted from the proceeds of
sales of such lands, and the residue onby shall be the amount to be
accounted for by the said Proprietors, and to be divided between
the two corporations in the manner specified in the second article
of this indenture. Provided, however, that the amount of such
residue shall never be less than fifty cents per square foot, except
that intermediate spaces between lots, when not intended for
burial, may be sold for sixteen and two thirds cents per square
foot.
Sixth, In case the said Proprietors shall hereafter build receiv-
ing tombs, catacombs, or columbaria, in the said Cemetery, the
said Horticultural Society shall pay one fourth part of the cost
thereof, and shall be entitled to one fourth part of all amounts
received for interments therein.
Seventh, The said Horticultural Society hereby release the said
Proprietors from all claims and demands for or on account of any
and all monej's received, or which shall be received by the said
Proprietors for single interments in the said Cemetery, prior to the
first day of January next.
Eighth, It is understood and agreed that the said Horticultural
Societ}* have no interest in the lands situated on the northerly side
of Mount Auburn Street, on which the gardener's house now
stands, and the said Society hereby expressly disclaims all right,
title, and interest therein.
In witness whereof the said Horticultural Society have caused
their corporate seal to be hereto affixed, and these presents, the
same having been approved by Marshall P. Wilder and Edward S.
Hand, a committee appointed for that purpose, to be subscribed on
490 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
behalf of the said Society by their President, Josiah Stickney ; and
the said Proprietors of the Cemetery of Mount Auburn have caused
their corporate seal to be hereto affixed, and these presents to be
subscribed by their President, Jacob Bigelow, the day and year
first above written.
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY,
By Josiah Stickxey.
Approved,
MARSHALL P. WILDER,
EDWARD S. RAND,
Comm. of 3Iass. Ilort. Soc.
PROPRIETORS OF THE CEMETERY OF MOUNT AUBURN,
By Jacob Bigelow, President.
AN INDENTURE OF TWO PARTS MADE THIS FIRST DAY OF
JANUARY, A.D. EIGHTEEN HUNDRED SIXTY-NINE, BY
AND BETWEEN THE MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL
SOCIETY OF THE FIRST PART AND THE PROPRIETORS
OF THE CEMETERY OF MOUNT AUBURN OF THE SEC-
OND PART.
Whereas in and by a certain Indenture by and between the
parties hereto, dated December 18, A.D. 1858, and recorded with
Middlesex Deeds, Lib. 870, fol. 3G5, it was among other things
provided as follows :
"Fifth, Whenever lands, otherwise unsalable or unfit for pur-
poses of burial, shall be filled up and improved, the cost of such
filling up and improvement shall first be deducted from the pro-
ceeds of sales of such lands, and the residue only shall be the
amount to be accounted for by the said Proprietors, and to be
divided between the two corporations in the manner specified in
the second article of this indenture : Provided, however, that the
amount of such residue shall never be less than fifty cents per
square foot, except that intermediate spaces between lots, when
not intended for burial, may be sold for sixteen and two thirds
cents per square foot."
And whereas difficulties have arisen in the construction and
carrying into effect the provisions of said article, as above set forth,
and it has been deemed expedient and for the interests of the par-
ties concerned that some modification of the said article should be
made :
INDENTURE WITH MOUNT AUBURN". 491
Now therefore this Indenture Witnesseth
First, The said parties in consideration of the premises hereby
mutually agree to and with each other in manner following,
namely, that in the future whenever the said Proprietors shall fill
up and improve any of the lands in said Cemetery which are now
or ma}- hereafter be or become unsalable or unfit for burial pur-
poses, the cost of such filling up or improvement during each and
every year shall be deducted from the gross amount of money
received from the sale of lands within said Cemetery during the
said year :
And the balance then remaining after such deduction shall be the
amount to be divided between the said Horticultural Society and
the said Proprietors in the proportions as provided and set forth in
article Second of said original Indenture.
Second, It is hereby further understood and agreed by and
between the said parties that the settlements heretofore made by
and between the said corporations by their respective treasurers
are hereby full}' ratified, confirmed, and established.
Third, It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
said original Indenture is hereby republished and confirmed,
excepting only so far as said article Fifth may be varied by the
provisions of this Indenture. But nothing herein contained shall
be held or construed to change or vary the minimum rate at which
lands in said Cemetery are to be valued in settlement as set forth
in the last clause of said article Fifth of said original Indenture.
In Witness whereof the said Massachusetts Horticultural Society
have caused their corporate seal to be hereto affixed and these
presents to be subscribed by James F. C. Hyde, its President, and
the said Proprietors of the Cemetery of Mount Auburn have caused
their corporate seal to be hereto affixed, and these presents to be
subscribed by their President, Jacob Bigelow, the day and year
first above written.
JACOB BIGELOW,
President of the Proprietors of the Cemetery of Mount Auburn.
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY,
By James F. C. Hyde, President.
402 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
G. Page 215.
REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES.
No. I.
ON FRUIT TREES AND FRUITS.
The Committee who haw in charge whatever relates to the mul-
tiplication of Fruit Trees, Fruit, etc., the recommending of objects
for premiums, and the awarding of them, have attended to that
duty, and submit the following report : —
FIRST. — ON NURSERIES.
For the best nursery of Apple Trees of the most approved kinds of
fruit, not less than one thousand in number, and not less than
two years old from tin- luidding or grafting ....
For tin; best nursery of PearTrees, of the most rare and approved
varieties, not less than one thousand in number, and not less
than two years old from the budding or engrafting, a premium of,
For the best nursery of Peach Trees of the greatest variety of the
' kinds, not less than two thousand in number, a premium of,
For the best nursery of Cherry Trees, not less than five hundred',
and not less than two years old, and of the best kinds, a premi-
um of
For the best nursery of Plum and Apricot Trees of approved varie-
ties, not less than three hundred in number, a premium of .
$10 00
10 00
10 00
5 00
SECOND. — ON FRUITS.
For the best Apples, not less than two dozen, a premium of .
For the best Pears, not less than one dozen, a premium of
For the besl Peaches, not leas than one dozen, a premium of .
Km- the best Plums, not less than one dozen, a premium of
Fur the besl Apricots, nol less than one dozen, a premium of .
For the best foreign Grapes, not less than three bunches, a premi-
um of
For the best native Grapes, not less than six bunches, a premium
of
Fur the best ( iooseberries, not less than one quart, a premium of .
Fur the best Strawberries, not less than one quart, a premium of .
THIRD. —ON THE CULTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF FRUIT TREES,
THE DISEASES INCIDENT TO THEM.
To the person who shall offer to the Society, at their annual meeting
in September, the besl treatise, in manuscript, on the cultivation
and management of fruit trees, a premium of .
5 00
$4 00
4 00
4 00
3 00
3 00
3 00
3 00
2 00
2 00
AND
$5 00
FIRST PRIZE LIST. 493
To the person who shall offer to the Society, at their annual meeting
in September, the best treatise, in manuscript, on any one or
more of the insects that attack fruit trees, with the best method
of preventing or destroying the same, a premium of . . $5 00
To the person who shall offer to the Society, at their annual meeting
in September, the best treatise in manuscript, on any one or more
of the diseases to which fruit trees are liable, with the best method
of preventing the same, a premium of 5 00
FOURTH. — NEW VARIETIES.
To the person who shall introduce and propagate the greatest
number of the new and most approved varieties of fruit trees, a
premium of $10 00
The times and places for exhibiting the various kinds of fruit to be fixed
by the Committee, and published.
Discretionary premiums to be awarded on fruits presented by members or
others, when rare and of excellent sorts.
All which is respectfully submitted, by order of the Committee.
E. PHINNEY, Chairman.
April 28, 1829.
No. II.
ON KITCHEN GARDENS.
The Standing Committee of the Massachusetts Horticultural
Society on the Culture and Prochicts of the Kitchen Garden, con-
sisting of Jacob Ticld, Samuel Ward, Aaron D. Williams, and John
B. Russell, have attended to that duty, and submit the following
list of premiums : —
Asparagus, fifty in a bunch, earliest and best in open ground . . $2 00
Cucumbers, best pair, on or before the 4th of July, in open ground . 2 00
Cabbages, early, the best four heads 2 00
Carrots, twelve roots, the earliest and best 2 00
Beets, twelve roots of the earliest and best, by the 4th of July . 2 00
Potatoes, early, one peck, the best, by the 4th of July . . 2 00
Potatoes, for winter, not less than twenty bushels, having regard to
their productiveness as well as quality 4 00
Celery, six plants, earliest and best 4 00
Beans, Large Lima, two quarts, shelled 2 00
Beans, the earliest and best, two quarts 1 00
Beans, the earliest and best, dwarf shell, two quarts . . . 1 00
Lettuce, four heads, the finest and heaviest of the season . . 1 00
Cauliflowers, four heads, finest and heaviest of the season . . 1 00
Broccoli, four heads, finest and heaviest of the season . . 2 00
Squashes, Winter Crookneck, the largest and best pair . . 1 00
Peas, one peck, the earliest and best, by the first Monday of June . 1 00
494 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Savoy Cabbages, six heads, best in the season $2 00
Melons, Water, the largest and best pair 100
Melons. Musk, Hi,. fi ni .st pair in the season 100
Indian Corn, for boiling, twelve ears, having regard to the size of
t he ears, their earliness, and the quality of the corn . . . rOO
The committee attend generally every Saturday at the Soci-
ety's hall, No. 52 North Market Street, for the examination of any
articles' that may be left for examination or premiums.
Per order, J. Tidd, Chairman.
Juxe 20, 1S29.
No. III.
OX ORXAirEXTAL TREES, SHRUBS, AND FLOWERS.
The Standing Committee on Ornamental Trees, Shrubs, Floivers,
and Greenhouses, beg leave respectfully to report the following
subjects for premiums, viz. : —
For the most successful cultivation of the American Holly the
number of trees not less than four, which have been trans-
planted at least three years $10 00
For the four best flowering plants of the Magnolia glauca, which
have been transplanted at least three years ... iq 00
For the most successful cultivation of the Rhododendron maximum,"
the number of plants not less than four, which have been trans-
planted three years ~ ^
For the best five plants of the Kalmia lati'folia, which have been
transplanted not less than -three years ... 2 00
For the best seedling plants of either of the above, not less than ten
In number, of three years' growth and upwards . 5 00
For the best specimens of Chinese Chrysanthemums, not less' than
five varieties _
For the best half dozen of Tulips ] J 00
For the best half dozen of Hyacinths . . .' .' ' ' ' 2 00
For (lie best half dozen of Ranunculus . . '!
Ft the best pot of Auriculas ....'.' 2 00
For the best pot of Anemones . ' ' 2 00
For the best pot of Pinks ....'' 200
For the best pot of Carnations ....."'' 2 00
Ft the best half dozen cultivated native Flowers ' ' ' ' 2 00
lor the finest Roses, not less than five varieties . 4
For the best bunch of double and single Dahlias ' 2 00
For the greatest number and finest kinds of the Camellia japonica ." 3 00
Discretionary premiums to be awarded on plants or flowers not
enumerated above ; but no premiums will be awarded until the y
ear
AWARD OF PREMIUMS, 1830. 495
1830. Of the times when, and the places where, cine notice will
be given by the committee.
In the selection of objects for premiums, your committee have
had chiefly in view the introduction into our gardens of some of
those indigenous shrubs whose rare beauty (in their opinion) de-
serves, and which they confidently hope will obtain, the notice of
the Society. They have no doubt that our own country is rich in
ornamental trees and shrubs, which, if more generally known and
cultivated, would be as generally admired and appreciated ; and
they cannot but regret, that, while so much labor and care have been
bestowed upon exotics inferior in beauty, our native plants have
literally been left "to waste their fragrance on the desert air."
Feeling confident that many if not all the indigenous shrubs
abounding in our vicinity may be naturalized to an upland soil,
and even improved by cultivation, they have been induced to offer
premiums for such as they think will well repay the labor of culti-
vation. All which is respectfully submitted. By order of the
committee.
ROBERT L. EMMONS, Chairman.
June 20, 1829.
Note. — None but the members of the Society are entitled to
the premiums offered in the reports of the three committees.
The Committees No. 1 and 2 meet at the Society's hall, No. 52
North Market Street, every Saturday, generally, for the examina-
tion of any articles that may be left for premium or exhibition.
H. Page 227.
PREMIUMS AWARDED IN 1830.
At a meeting of the Committee of the Massachusetts Horticul-
tural Society on Fruits, on Saturday, the 4th of December, 1830,
the following premiums were awarded : —
For the best Apples, to John Prince of Roxbury . . . . $4 00
For the best summer Pears (Andrews), to Rufus F. Phipps of
Charlestown 4 00
For the best autumn Pears (Bartlett), to Enoch Bartlett of Roxbury, 4 00
For the best native Pears (Heathcot), to Roderick Toohey, gardener
to Mrs. Gore of Waltham 4 00
3 00
3 CO
2 00
2 00
2 00
496 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
For (he Lest Poaches (Grosse Mignonne), to Elijah Vose of Dorches-
' ' ' • • • • • • . S4 00
For the besl native Peaches, to E. M. Richards of Dedham '. '. 2 00
For the besl Apricots (Moor Park), to E. Phinney of Lexington .' 3 00
Pur the best Nectarines (Red Roman), to Edward Sharp of Dorches-
ter
For the besl Plums (Bohjiar's Washington), to Samuel R. Johnson
oi < barlestown
For the besl I herries (Black Tartarian), to Rufus Howe of Dorches-
ter
For the besl native Cherries (Downer's Mazzard), to Samuel Downer
of Dorchester
For the best foreign Grapes (White Muscadine) of out-door culture
to David Fosdick of Charlestown 3 00
For the best native Grapes (Catawba), to Nathaniel Seav'er of Rox-
bll T • • 3 00
For the best Gooseberries (Jolly Angler), to N. Seaver of Roxbury ' 2 00
For the best Strawberries (Keens's Seedling), to D. Haggerston of the
Charlestown Vineyard ....
To Thomas Willott. gardener to Mr. E. Breed of Charlestown, for the
best Grapes (Black Hamburg) grown under glass, presented to
the Society at their Anniversary Festival in September last,
the Committee recommend a gratuity of 5 00
To Elisha Edwards of Springfield, for several beautiful varieties of
rare and valuable Fruits, presented to the Society at various
meetings, a gratuity of 5 0q
By order of the Committee.
E. PHINNEY, Chairman.
The Standing Committee on Ornamental Trees, Flowers, etc.,
award the following premiums for the year 1830 :
For the most successful cultivation of the Rhododendron maximum a
premium of s.j to Mr. Roderick Toohey of Waltham.
Pur the best specimen of Chinese Chrysanthemums a premium of $3 to
Mr. David Ilairgerston of Charlestown.
For the six finest Tulips a premium of $2 to Mr. Augustus Aspinwall of
Brookline.
Forthe six finest Hyacinths a premium of $2 to Mr. Augustus Aspinwall
of Brookline.
For the finest Ranunculus a premium of $2 to Mr. George W. Pratt of
"N atertov n.
For the finest cultivated native Flowers a premium of $2 to Messrs Win-
Bhip of Brighton.
For the finest Roses a premium of $4 to Mr. Augustus Aspinwall of
Brookline.
AWARD OF PREMIUMS, 1S30. 497
For the finest Dahlias a premium of $2 to Mr. David Haggerston of
Charlestown.
For the finest Pinks a premium of $2 to Mr. George Thompson of Med-
ford.
For the best Carnations a premium of $2 to Messrs. Winship of Brighton.
The many specimens of native Flowers presented by Messrs.
John Russell, Daniel Chandler, and E. M. Richards, have ren-
dered the weekly exhibitions of the Society peculiarly interesting.
By order of the Committee.
R. L. EMMONS, Chairman.
N.B. — Those members to whom premiums have been awarded
can obtain an order on the Treasurer for the amount, on applica-
tion to the Chairman of the Committee.
No report was made by the Committee on Vegetables ; but we
find in the New England Farmer of July 23, 1830, that they had
awarded the premium for Early Potatoes to Samuel Pond of Cam-
bridge, and for Early Beets and Early Cauliflowers, to Nathaniel
Seaver of Roxbury.
498
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
OFFICEES AND MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY.
OFFICEES.
Presidents.
Henry A. S. Dearborn .
. 1829-1834
Joseph Breck
. . 1835
Charles M. Hovey . .
James F. C. Hyde . .
Marshall P. Wilder . .
1841-1848
William C. Strong .
Francis Parkman . .
Joseph S. Cabot . . .
1852-1857
William Gray, jun. .
. . 1858
Vice-Pr
jsidents.
Zebedee Cook, jun. . .
1829-1834
Josiali Stickney . . . .
John C. Gray ....
1826-1833
Edward S. Rand . .
Enoch Bartlett ....
1829-1839
Ebenezer Wight . .
Frederick Howes . . .
. . 1829
Joseph Breck . . .
Elias 1'hinney ....
1831-1833
Charles M. Hovey
Elijah Vose
1834-1835
James F. C. Hyde
Samuel A. fclmrtlcff . .
1834-1837
William C. Strong .
Jonathan Winship . .
1835-1847
Charles 0. Whitmore
George W. Pratt . . .
1835, i. 13
II. Hollis Hunnewell
Pickering Dodge . . .
. . is:;:;
William R. Austin .
John Prince
1837-1839
Francis Parkman . .
Theodore Lyman, jun. .
. . 1838
P. Brown Hovey . . .
Marshall P. Wilder . .
1839, 1840
H. Weld Fuller . . .
Benjamin V. French. .
• L857
Edward S. Rand, jun.
William Oliver ....
1840, is li
William Gray, jun. .
Cheever Newhall . . .
1841-1857
Charles H. B. Breck . .
Edward M. Richards
1842-1857
John C. Hovey ....
Joseph S. Cabot . . .
1848-1851
Treas
urers.
Cheever Newhall . . .
1829-1833
Frederick W. Macondray .
William Worthington .
1*34-1837
William R. Austin . . .
1838 1848
Edwin W. Buswell . .
OFFICERS.
499
Corresponding Secretaries. '
Jacob Bigelow 1820-1835 | Samuel H. Gibbens
Robert Treat Paine . . . 1835-1841 Charles N. Brackett
James E. Teschemacker . 1842-1848 I Edwin W. Buswell
Ebenezer Wight .... 1849-1865 I
186f>, 18G7
. . 1868
18G9-1875
Secretary.
Robert Manning . . .
1876-1878.
Recording Secretaries.
Robert L. Emmons
Robert Treat Paine
Ezra "Weston, jun.
Edward M. Richards
Ebenezer Wight .
Edward C. R. Walker
1829-1833
1834, 1835
1835-1839
1840, 1841
1842-1846
1847-1849
Daniel Leach 1850, 1851
William C. Strong . . . 1852-1855
Francis Lyman Winship, . 185G-1865
Francis P. Denny .... 1866, 1867
Edward S. Rand, jun. . . 18G8-1875
Robert Manning .... 1876-1878
Counsellors.
Augustus Aspinwall . . .
Thomas Brewer ....
Henry A. Breed ....
Benj. W. Crowninshield .
J. G. Cogswell
Nathaniel Davenport . .
E. Hersey Derby ....
Samuel Downer, 1829-1835,
Oliver Fiske .... 1829-
Benjamin V. French . 1829-
J. M. Gourgas
T. W. Harris, M.D. . . .
William Jackson ....
Samuel Jaques, jun. . . .
Joseph G. Joy
William Kenrick ....
William Lincoln, 1829, 1830,
J. P. Leland
John Lemist
Elias Pliinney
Benjamin Rodman . . .
John B. Russell ....
Charles Senior
William H. Sumner . . .
Charles Tappan ....
Jacob Tidd
Malthus A. Ward, M.D. .
Jonathan Winship . . .
1829-1841
1829-1840
1829-1840
1829-1835
1829-1834
1829-1838
1829-1840
1840, 1841
1835, 1S37
■1834, 1841
1829-1837
1829-1835
. . 1829
1829-1837
1829-1840
1829-1841
1838-1840
. . 1829
1829-1840
1829, 1830
1829-1840
1829-1834
1829-1834
1829-1835
1829-1840
1829-1838
1829-1832
1829-1841
Samuel Ward 1829, 1830
Aaron D. Williams . . . 1829-1840
W. Worthington, 1829-1834, 1838-1840
James Read 1830
Elijah Vose 1830-1833
S. A. Shurtleff, M.D., 1831-1834, 1838
Edward M. Richards, 1831-1835, 1841
John W. Webster, M.D. . 1832-1837
George W. Pratt .
Edward W. Payne
George W. Brimmer
David Haggerston
Charles Lawrence .
Theodore Lyman, jun
John W. Boott . .
John Prince . . .
Matthias P. Sawyer
Thomas Whitmarsh
William Pratt, jun.
Thomas G. Fessenden
Joseph S. Cabot
N. Morton Davis
Thomas Lee . .
William Oliver .
Lemuel P. Grosvenor
P. B. Hovey, jun.
Robert Manning
Otis Johnson
1832-1834
. . 1832
1832-1838
1833-1840
1833-1840
1835-1837, 1839
. . 1835
. . 1835
1836-1840
1836-1840
1836-1838
1836-1838
1838-1840
1838-1840
1838-1841
1841
1841
1841
1841
1841
Professors of Botany and Vegetable Physiology.
Malthus A. Ward, M.D., . 1829-1833
John Lewis Russell . 1834-59, 1863-73
Asa Gray 1860-1802
William Boott 1874, 1875
John Robinson 1876-1878
500
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Professors of Entomology.
Thaddeus William Harris, 1829-1866 I John Robinson 1876
J.W. P. Jenks 1857-1806 | Samuel H. Scudder 1878
Professors of Horticultural Chemistry.
John W. Webster .... 1829-1839 I E. N. Horsford 1848-1860
Samuel L.Dana .... 1840-1847 I Augustus A. Hayes . . . 1861-1866
MEMBERS.
FOUNDERS,
Present at the First Meeting, February 24, 1S29.
Bartlett, Enoch, Roxbury.
Breed, Andrews, Lynn.
Breed, Henry A., Lynn.
Cook, Zebedee, jun., Dorchester.
Dearborn, II. A. S., Roxbury.
Downer, Samuel, Dorchester.
Emmons, Robert L., Boston.
French, Benjamin V., Boston.
Ives, John M., Salem.
Kenrick, William, Newton.
Lowell, John, Roxbury.
Manning, Robert, Salem.
Newhall, Cheever, Dorchester.
Russell, John B., Boston.
Sumner, William H., Dorchester.
Winship, Jonathan, Brighton.
ORIGINAL MEMBERS,
W7io subscribed before the organization of the Society, March 17, 1829.
Adamson, John, Roxbury.
Ames, John W., Dedham.
Andrew, John H., Salem.
Aspinwall, Augustus, Brookline.
Baldwin, Enoch, Dorchester.
Bigelow, Jacob, Boston.
Bradlee, Joseph P., Boston.
Breck, Joseph, Pepperell.
Breed, Ebenezer, Boston.
Breed, John, Charlestown.
Bnwer, Thomas, Roxbury.
Bridge, Nathan, Charlestown.
Brimmer, George W., Boston.
i -i imes, ' lambridge.
Capen, Rev. Lemuel, South Boston.
r, William E., Cambridge.
Champney, John, Roxbury.
Chandler, Daniel, Lexington.
Chase, Hezekiah, Lynn.
Ciapp, Nathaniel, Dorchester.
Cogswell, J. G., Northampton.
Colman, Henry, Salem.
Coolidge, Joseph, Boston.
Copeland, B. F., Roxbury.
Cordis, Thomas, Boston.
Cowing, Cornelius, Roxbury.
Crowninshield, Benjamin W., Salem.
Cunningham, J. A., Dorchester.
Davenport. Nathaniel, Milton.
Davis, Charles, Roxhury.
Davis, Isaac, Roxhury.
Dean. William, Salem.
Derby, E. Hersey, Salem.
Dickson, James A., Dorchester.
Dodge, Pickering, Salem.
Dodge, Pickering, jun., Salem.
Doggett, John, Boston.
Dorr, Nathaniel, Roxbury.
Dowse, Thomas, ('amhridgeport.
Drew, Daniel, Boston.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
501
Dudley, David, Roxbury.
Fessenden, Thomas G., Boston.
Fiske, 01i\ r er, Worcester.
Forrester, John, Salem.
Frothingham, Samuel, Boston.
Gannett, T. B., Cambridge.
Gardner, Joshua, Dorchester.
Gardner, William F., Salem.
Goi - e, Watson, Roxbury.
Gray, John C, Boston.
Green, Charles W., Roxbury.
Greenleaf, Thomas, Quincy.
Greenough, David S., Roxbury.
Harris, Samuel D., Roxbury.
Harris, Thad. M., D.D., Dorchester.
Harris, Thaddeus W., M.D., Milton.
Haskins, Ralph, Roxbury.
Hayden, John, Brookline.
Heard, John, jun., Boston.
Hill, Jeremiah, Boston.
Holbrook, Amos, Milton.
Howe, Rufus. Dorchester.
Howes, Frederick, Salem.
Huntington, Joseph, Roxbury.
Huntington, Ralph, Boston.
Jackson, Patrick T., Boston.
Jackson, William, Plymouth.
Jaques, Samuel, jun., Charlestown.
Johonnot, George S., Salem.
Jones, Thomas K., Boston.
Joy, Joseph G., Boston.
Lawrence, Abbott, Boston.
Lawrence, Charles, Salem.
Lee, Thomas, jun., Roxbury.
Leland, J. P., Sherburne.
Lemist, John, Roxbury.
Lewis, Henry, Roxbury.
Lincoln, Levi, Worcester.
Lincoln, William, Worcester.
Lowell, John A., Boston.
Lyman, George, Boston.
Lyman, Theodore, jun., Boston.
Manners, George, Boston.
Minns, Thomas, Boston.
Newell, Joseph R., Boston.
Newhall, Josiah, Lynnfield.
Nuttall, Thomas, Cambridge.
Oliver, Francis J., Boston.
Otis, Harrison G., Boston.
Parsons, Gorham, Brighton.
Parsons, Theophilus, Boston.
Penniman, Elisha, Brookline.
Perkins, Samuel G., Boston.
Perkins, Thomas H., Boston.
Pettee, Otis, Newton.
Phinney, Elias, Lexington.
Pickman, Benjamin T., Salem.
Pratt, George W., Boston.
Prescott, William, Boston.
Prince, John, Roxbury.
Prince, John, jun., Salem.
Putnam, Jesse, Boston.
Read, James, Roxbury.
Robbins. E. II., jun., Boston.
Rogers, Richard S., Salem.
Rollins, William, Boston.
Rowe, Joseph, Milton.
Russell, J. W., Roxbury.
Sears, David, Boston.
Senior, Charles, Roxbury.
Silsby, Enoch, Boston.
Smith, Cyrus, Sandwich.
Stevens, Isaac, Boston.
Story, F. H., Salem.
Sullivau, Richard, Brookline.
Sutton, William, jun., Danvers.
Swett, John, Dorchester.
Tappan, Charles, Brookline.
Thorndike, Israel, jun., Boston.
Tidd, Jacob, Roxbury.
Tilden, Joseph, Boston.
Toohey, Roderick, Waltham.
Train, Samuel, Medford.
Tucker, Richard D., Boston.
Vose, Elijah, Dorchester.
Waldo. Daniel, Worcester.
Ward, Mai thus A., M.D., Salem.
Ward, Samuel, Roxbury.
Webster, John W., M.D., Cambridge.
Welles, John, Dorchester.
White, Abijah, Watertown.
White, Stephen, Salem.
Wight, Ebenezer, Boston.
Williams, Aaron D., Roxbury.
Williams, Francis I., Roxbury.
Williams, L. G., Roxbury.
Williams, Samuel G., Brookline.
Worthington, William, Dorchester.
502
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
This
1865.
is.;.
L832.
L849.
1865.
1830.
1850.
I860.
1847.
1845.
1831.
1864.
1845.
1845.
1847.
L869.
L869.
1863.
1846.
L863.
1860.
1865.
1844.
1871.
1865.
1864.
1867.
1864.
1841.
1867.
1865.
1867.
1865.
L865.
1864.
1849.
1864.
1845.
1867.
1846.
1878.
1876.
ELECTED MEMBERS.
list ta made up from the records of the Soci( ty, and does not include those who
icer<- membi r« only by virtue of ownership of a lot in Mount Auburn.
Abbott, Samuel L., Boston
Adams, Benjamin, Boston.
Adams, Charles v., Quincy.
Adams, Charles Frederick, Bos
ton.
. Adams, c. S., - t'amingham.
Adams, Daniel, Newbury.
Adams, George E., Mcdford.
. Adams, Isaac, South Boston.
Adams, John J., Boston.
Adams, Joseph II.. Boston.
Adams. Samuel, Milton.
Adams, William, Winchester.
Adams, Dr. \\\ A., Dorchester.
Adams, Z. B..M.D., Boston.
Albree, John, Newton.
Albro, ( diaries, Taunton.
Alger, R. F., Dedham.
Allen, Abbott, West Cambridge.
Allen, Amos, Newton.
Allen, Andrew F., West Cam-
bridge.
Allen, Calvin, Roxbury.
Allen, Charles A., Cambridge-
port.
Allen, Edward, Roxbury.
Allen, E. L., Boston.
Allen, Frederick, Boston.
Allen, George D., Maiden.
Allen, GeorgeE., WestNewton.
Allen, Henry <)., Maiden.
Allen, John Fisk, Salem.
Allen, Nathaniel T., West New-
ton.
Allen, William IT., Dedham.
Alley, Franklin, Marblehcad.
Ames, F. L., Easton.
Ames, Frank M., Canton.
Ames, < leorge, Boston.
Ames. P. Adams, Huston.
Anns. i:. \v.. Roxbury.
Ames, Samuel T., Boston.
Amory, Charles, Boston.
Amory, Frederick, Brookline.
Amorj , James s., Boston.
Anderson. Alexander. Bingham.
Anderson, Charles .).. Quincy.
184G. Andrews, Alfred A., Roxbury.
18G4. Andrews, Charles L., Swamp-
scott.
1SG5. Andrews, E. J., Boston.
1829. Andrews, Ebenezer T., Boston.
1829. Andrews, Ferdinand, Lancaster.
1858. Andrews. Frank YV\, Boston.
I860. Andrews, Joseph, Waltham.
1855. Andrews, Robert, Boston.
1834. Andrews, William T., Boston.
1858. Andros, Milton, Boston.
1829. Anthony, James, Providence
R.I.
1870. Anthony, John G., Cambridge.
l 57. Apple, Antoine, Brighton.
18G3. Appleton, Edward, Reading.
1871. Appleton, Francis II., Peabody.
1845. Appleton, Nathan, Boston.
1845. Appleton, Robert, Boston.
1830. Appleton, Samuel, Boston.
1848. Appleton, Samuel A., Boston.
1867. Appleton, AYilliam S., Boston.
1833. Armstrong, Hon. Samuel T.,
Boston.
1868. Arnold, H. P., Cambridge.
1843. Arnold, John, Dorchester.
1857. Ashby, William, Xewburyport.
1864. Athcrton, Samuel, Dorchester.
1864. Atkins, Elisha, Belmont.
1829. Atkinson, Amos, Brookline.
18G2. Atkinson, Charles M., Cam-
bridge.
1865. Atkinson, Edward, Brookline.
1874. Atkiuson, John, West Newton.
1871 Atkinson, W. B., Newburyport.
1832. Austin. Elbridge Gerry, Boston.
1845. Austin, William R., Dorchester. ■
1865. Avery, Edward, Weymouth.
1865. Ayer, Adams, Roxbury.
1865. Avers, John W., Boston.
1865. Ayling, Isaac, Boston.
1839. Aylwin, William C, Boston.
1847. Babbitt, Isaac. Boston.
1846. Bachelder, Samuel, Cambridge
1856. Bachi, Ignatius C, Dorchester.
1865. Backus, C. E., Dorchester.
18G5. Bacon, Augustus, Roxbury.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
503
1866. Bacon, George, Brookline.
1847. Bacon, John H., Medford.
1847. Bacon, Robert, Medford.
1840. Bacon, William, Roxbury.
18G5. Bacon, "William, jnn., Roxbury.
1830. Badlam, Stephen, Boston.
1830. Bailey, Ebenezer, Boston.
1859. Bailey, Edwin C, Boston.
1829. Bailey, Kendall, Charlestown.
1850. Bailey, Kendall, Charlestown.
1842. Baker, Col. Waiter, Dorchester.
1868. Baker, William E., Boston.
1857. Baker, William P., Quincy.
1847. Balch, Benjamin W., Dedham.
1870. Balch, David M., Salem.
1829. Balch, Joseph, Boston.
1865. Ball, S. B., Port Norfolk.
1830. Ballard, Joseph, Boston.
1845. Ballister, Joseph, Dorchester.
1864. Bancroft, E. P., Newton. "
1875. Bancroft, John C, Milton.
1868. Banfleld, Francis L., Boston.
1865. Bangs, Edward, Boston.
1839. Bangs, Edward D., Worcester.
1852. Bangs, Isaiah, Cambridge.
1875. Bard, James, Framingham.
1846. Barker, Daniel C, Lynn.
1865. Barker, John G., Cambi-idge.
1864. Barnard, Charles, West Newton.
1846. Barnard, Charles F., Boston.
1859. Barnard, James M,, Boston.
1873. Barnard, Mrs. Joel, Watertown.
1876. Barnard, Robert M., Everett.
1841. Barnard, Samuel, Watertown.
1850. Barnes, David W., Boston.
1840. Barnes, Parker, Boston.
1866. Barnes, Walter S., Somerville.
1851. Barnes, William D., Boston.
1858. Barnes, William H., Roxbury.
1867. Barney, Levi C, Boston.
1864. Barratt, James, South Framing-
ham.
1865. Barrett, Aaron, Maiden.
1832. Barrett, George C, Boston.
1844. Barrows, Thomas, Dedham.
1867. Bartholomew, William, West
Newton.
1844. Bartlett,* Edmund, Newbury-
port.
1865. Bartlett, James, Brookline.
1840. Bartlett, Levi, Boston.
1841. Barton, Jabez W., Boston.
1865. Bates, Amos, Hingham.
1865. Bates, Caleb, Kingston.
1864. Bates, Erastus C, Cambridge.
1868. Bates, Henry M., Newton Cor-
ner.
1868. Bates, Ives G., Boston.
1860. Bates, John D., Boston.
1845. Bates, Thomas, Boston.
1859. Bayley, Dudley H., Boston.
1860. Bayley, John P., Boston.
1864. Beal, Alexander, Dorchester.
1831. Beale, George W., Quincy.
1860. Bean, James, Medford.
1877. Beard, Edward L., Cambridge.
1865. Beck, Frederick, Brookline.
1875. Becker, Frank, Belmont.
1S76. Beckford, Daniel R., jun., Mar-
blehead.
1878. Beebe, J. Arthur, Boston.
1864. Beebe, James M., Boston.
1849. Beecher, Laban S., Roxbury.
1845. Belknap, A. E., Boston.
1864. Bell, Joseph H., Maiden.
1852. Bell, Robert G., Lowell.
1865. Bell, Theodore H., Roxbury.
1845. Bemis, Emery, Cambridgeport.
1831. Bender, Jacob, Boston.
1865. Bennett, A. H., Taunton.
1857. Bennett, Oliver, Framingham.
1862. Benton, Reuben P., Somerville.
1868. Berry, James, Boston.
1841. Berry, Richard N., Boston.
1865. Bickford, Weare D., Brighton.
1847. Bigelow, George Tyler, Boston.
1853. Bigelow, Samuel, Brighton.
1831. Billings, Joseph H., Roxbury.
1846. Bingham, Daniel, Dedham.
1860. Binney, Amos, Boston.
1866. Binney, Amos P., Boston.
1863. Birchard, Charles, West Cam-
bridge.
1870. Bird, Charles, North Chelsea
1864. Bird, Harrison, Brookline.
1865. Bird, John A., Brookline.
1867. Bird, John L., Dorchester.
1834. Bishop, Nathaniel H., Medford.
1867. Black, John A., Roxbury.
1864 Black, J. W., Cambridge.
1858. Blagg, Samuel, Waltham.
1846. Blainey, J. M., Boston.
1851. Blaisdell, John, Lexington.
1845. Blake, Charles B., Boston.
504 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1846. Blake, Francis S. f Boston.
1846. Blake, George I!.. Boston.
1849 Blake, George T., Boston.
1864. Blanchard, G. I). B., Maiden.
1846. Blanchard, John A., Boston.
1874. Blanchard, John W., Boston.
1866. Blaney, David II., East Boston
Blanej . Eenry, Brookline.
1865. Blinn.R. I)., Lexington.
1849. Bliss, B. K.. Springfield.
1847. Blodget, J. W., Boston.
1864. Blodgett, W. A., Belmont.
Blood, C. L., Boston.
1SG5. Boardman, William II., Boston,
1869. Bocher, Ferdinand, Boston.
1848. Bogle, William, North Maiden.
18(55. Bolles, Matthew, West Roxbury.
1875. Bolles. William I'., M.D.. Iios-
ton.
Bolton, John B., Somerville.
. Bond, George, Boston.
. Bond, George W., Boston.
. Bond, Thomas, North Brook-
field.
Boott, William, Boston.
Borland, John N., M.D., Boston.
Bosson, Charles P., Boston.
Botume, John, Stoneham.
Bouve", Ephraim W.,.Roxbury.
Bouvc, Thomas T., Boston.
Bowditch, Azell, Boston.
Bowditch, Azell C, Roxbury.
Bowditch, J. Ingersoll, Boston.
Bowditch, William E., Boston.
Bowditch, William I., Brookline.
Bowdoin, James, Boston.
Bowen, diaries, Boston.
Bowker, Mrs. Howard, Maiden'.
Bowker, William H., Boston.
Bowman, A. H., Boston.
Bowman, Francis, Cambridge-
port.
Boyd, Francis, Boston.
Brackett, Cephas JI., Brighton
Brackett, Charles n., Newton.
Brackett, Edward A., Winches
ter.
Bradbury, Charles, Boston.
Bradford, Charles l',, Roxbury
Bradford, Samuel D., Boston.
Bradish, I.. J., Huston.
Bradlee, Henry, Boston.
18C5
1830
1832,
1854,
1835.
1873.
1839.
18G5.
1865.
1847.
1840.
1849.
1845.
1877.
1859.
1829.
1833.
18G5.
1878.
1865.
1840.
1848.
is?:,.
1S50.
1863.
1846.
1846.
1830.
1865.
1845.
1844. Bradlee, James B, Boston.
1850. Bradlee, John B., Boston.
I860. Bradlee, John D., Milton.
185G. Bradlee, John T., Boston.
1841. Bradlee, Joseph, Boston.
1838. Bradlee, Josiah, Boston.
1841. Bradshaw, E. Edes, Charles-
town.
Bradstreet, Samuel, Dorchester.
Bragg, Samuel A. B., Mattapan.
Breck, Charles II., Boston.
Breck, Charles II. B., Brighton.
Bresee, Albert, Hortonville, Vt.
Brewer, Eliab Stone, Roxbury.
Brewer, Gardner, Boston.
Brewer, John R., Boston.
Brewer, Otis, Boston.
Brewer, T. M., M.D., Boston.
Bridges, George E., Newton.
Briggs, Richard, Brookline.
Brigham, William T., Boston.
Bright, Jonathan B., Waltham.
Bright, William E., Waltham.
Brimmer, Hon. Martin, Boston.
. Brintnall, Benjamin, Boston.
. Britton, S. A., Roxbury.
. Brookhouse, J. H., Somerville.
. Brooks, Addison, West Cam-
bridge.
Brooks, Francis, Medford.
Brooks, George, Brookline.
Brooks, Hiram, Carhbridgeport.
Brooks, J. W., Milton.
Brooks, Peter C, Boston.
Brown, A. S., Jamaica Plain.
Brown, Atherton T., Roxbury.
Brown, Charles E., Yarmouth,
N.S.
Brown, Ebenezer, Lynn.
Brown, Edward J., Brookline.
Brown, Frederick, Boston.
Brown, George, Beverly.
Brown. George Barnard, Boston.
Brown, George B., Boston.
Brown, Jacob, Woburn.
Brown, Jonathan, Somerville.
Brown, Joseph T., Boston.
Brown, J. M.. Boston.
Brown, J. W., Beverly.
Brown, Simon, Concord.
Brownell, E. S., Essex Junction,
Vt.
18G0
1869
1873
1857,
1871,
1S30.
1831.
1858.
L849.
1864.
1808.
18G0.
is?:;.
1651.
1SG4.
1845.
1874.
1859.
1864.
1SG3.
18G5.
18G4.
1847.
1861.
18G4.
1864.
1866,
is;:;
1845,
1868.
1845.
1838.
1867.
1875.
is::;.
1863.
18G0.
1831.
1S48.
1852.
1874.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
505
1850. Bruce, Benjamin, Brookline.
1862. Bruce, J. G., Cambridge.
1867. Bruce, Nathaniel F., Stoneham.
1855. Bryant, Albert W., Lexington.
1859. Br j- ant, Gridley J. F., Boston.
1S35. Buckingham, Joseph T., Boston.
1859. Bucklin, S. S., Jamaica Plain.
1848. Buckman, Bowen, Woburn.
1829. Buckminster, Edward F., Fram-
ingham.
1829. Buckminster, Lawson, jun.,
Framingham.
1860. Buckminster, William J., Mai-
den.
1849. Buffo rd, Joseph H., Roxbury.
1853. Bull, E. W., Concord.
1847. Bullard, Albert, Boston.
1845. Bullard, Calvin, Boston.
1846. Bullard, Lewis, Dedham.
1872. Bullard, William S., Boston.
1855. Burgess, Edward P., Dedham.
1857. Burley, Edward, Beverly.
1845. Burnett, Joseph, Boston.
1866. Burnham, T. O. H. P., Boston.
1848. Burns, Edward, Brighton.
1860. Burr, Charles C, Newton.
1852. Burr, Fearing, jun., Hingham.
1852. Burr, Matthew H., Hingham.
1865. Burrage, James, West Cam-
bridge.
1831. Burridge, Capt. Martin, Med-
ford.
1857. Busch, John W., Brookline.
1863. Bush, F. T., Weston.
1864. Bush, J. B., Boston.
1871. Buss, George S., Medford.
1829. Bussey, Benjamin, Roxbury.
1856. Buswell, Edwin W., Maiden.
1867. Buswell, Frank E., Boston.
1870. Buswell, Harriet S., Boston.
1868. Butler, Aaron, jun., South Read-
ing.
1873. Butler, Edward, Wellesley.
1841. Butler, Dr. J. S., Boston.
1865. Butterfield, Samuel, West Cam-
bridge.
1859. Butterfield, William P., Cam-
bridge port.
1857. Cabot, Edward C, Brookline.
1837. Cabot, Joseph S., Salem.
1830. Cabot, Samuel, Brookline.
1841. Cadness, John, Boston.
1845. Cains, William, South Boston.
1867. Cairns, William, Melrose.
1870. Calder, Augustus P., Roxbury.
1840. Call, Frederick L., Boston.
1830. Callender, Joseph, Boston.
1S65. Campbell, Benjamin F., Boston.
1866. Candler, John W., Brookline.
1829. Capen, Gen. Aaron, Dorchester.
1876. Capen, Aaron D., Mattapan.
1844. Capen, Francis L., South Bos-
ton.
1865. Capen, John, Boston.
1856. Carey, Isaac, Boston.
18G5. Carlisle, Ira B., Boston.
1870. Carlton, Charles H., Melrose.
1865. Carlton, Samuel A., Somerville.
1829. Carnes, Nathaniel G., New
York.
1847. Carruth, Charles, Boston.
1842. Carruth, Nathan, Boston.
1831. Carter, Horatio, Lancaster.
1867. Carter, Miss Maria E , Woburn.
1845. Carter, O. C. B., Boston.
1845. Carter, Richard B., Boston.
1872. Carter, Miss Sabra, Wilming-
ton.
1874. Cartwright, James, Wellesley.
18G5. Chadbourne, M. W.,Watertown.
1857. Chadwick, Joseph H, Roxbury.
1855. Chaffin, John C, Newton.
1873. Chamberlain, C. W., Arlington.
1837. Chamberlain, Edward, jun.,
Boston.
1865. Chamberlin, C. D., Boston.
1865. Chandler, H. H., Boston.
1858. Chandler, Horace P., Milton.
1829. Chandler, Col. Samuel, Lexing-
ton.
1867. Chapin, George H., Maiden.
1865. Chapin, N. G., Brookline.
1845. Chaplin, Dr. C. F., Cambridge.
1847. Chaplin, Dr. Daniel, Cambridge.
1867. Chapman, Edward, Arlington.
1866. Chapman, John W., Maiden.
1847. Chapman, Jonathan, Boston.
1866. Chapman, Moses C, Milton.
1870. Chase, A. J., Lynn.
1864. Chase, Mrs. C. B., Medford.
1864. Chase, Daniel E., Watertown.
1864. Chase, G. Wingate, Dorchester.
1865. Chase, Henry J., Maiden.
1847. Chase, Hezekiah S., Boston.
m
MASSACHUSETTS. HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
L864. Ohasi , J. C, Gambridgeport.
1878. Chase, Joseph s., .Maiden.
1856. Chase, William M., Worcester.
1865. Chenery, Winthrop W., Water-
town.
. rthur, Boston.
1871. Cheney, A. P., Natick.
1864. ' 'hem j . Benjamin P., Boston.
1850. Chickering, Horatio, Dedham.
1845. Chickering, Jonas, Boston.
1871. Child, David A.., Wayland.
L869. Child, William ('.. Medford.
1865. Childs. Alfred A., Dorchester.
1868. childs. Francis J., Cambridge.
is:;:;, childs, Joshua, Boston.
1849. Childs, L. C. East Lexington.
1860. Childs, N. i:., Dorchester.
1859. Chilson, Gardner, Boston.
1873. Claflin, II envy, Brighton.
1867. Claflin, William, Xcwfon.
1876. Clapp, Edward B., Dorchester.
1865. Clapp, E. W., Walpole.
1861. Clapp, Frederick, Dorchester.
1871. Clapp, Frederick A., Dorchester.
1829. Clapp, Isaac, Dorchester.
1831. Clapp, John, South Reading.
1831. Clapp, Joshua, Boston.
1864. clapp. Lemuel, Dorchester.
1871. Clapp, Orrin C, Boston.
1854. Clapp, Thaddeus, Dorchester.
1871. Clapp, William ('.. Dorchester.
1845. Clapp, W. W., Boston.
1855. Clapp, W. W., jun., Boston.
1862. Clark, Benjamin C, jun., Bos-
ton.
1867. Clark, Daniel, Waltham.
1841. Clark, E. D.,~~Boston.
1864. Clark, George W., .Maiden.
1871. Clark. .lames W., Framingham.
18G5. Clark. Joseph, Canton.
1844. (lark. Joseph W. , Boston.
1868. Clark, Orus, Boston.
1849. Clark, Peter, Andover.
1856. Clark, Randolph M., Dedham.
1849. Clark, Rev. Thomas M.. Boston.
1859. Clark, W. L., Neponset.
1867. Clark, William S., Amherst.
1845. Clarke. Albert, Newton.
1871. ., Roxbury.
1861. Comley, James, Brighton.
1845. Comstock, B. W., Providence,
R.I.
1865. Conant, Rufus, Somerville.
1868. Converse, E. S., Maiden.
1864. Converse, James W., West
Cambridge.
1857. Converse, Joshua P., Woburn.
1870. Converse. Parker L., Woburn.
1865. Cook, Isaac, Charlestown.
1878. Cooke, Henry C , West New-
ton.
1873. Coolidge, Joshua, Watertown.
1831. Coolidge, Samuel F., Boston.
1833. Coolidge, Thomas B., Boston.
1850. Copeland, Charles. Boston.
187:1. Copeland, Franklin, West Ded-
ham.
1840. Copeland, Robert McCleary,
Boston.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
507
1853. Copeland, Robert Morris, Au-
burndale.
1864. Copeland, W. H. C, Boston.
1850. Cordwell, George B., Roxbury.
1871. Corey, E. W., Arlington.
1855. Cormerais, Henry, Dedbam.
1845. Cornell, Rev. William M., Bos-
ton.
1829. Cotting, William, West Cam-
bridge.
1S40. Cotting, William W., West Cam-
bridge.
1841. Courtis, William, Boston.
1832. Cowing, Howland, jun., Rox-
bury.
1869. Cowles, William W., Boston.
1864. Cox, Daniel P., Maiden.
1868. Cox. David P., Maiden.
1868. Cox, George P., Maiden.
1874. Cox, James F., Abington.
1868. Coy, Samuel I., Boston.
1863. Craft, George, Brookline.
1829. Crafts, Ebenezer, Roxbury.
1850. Crafts, William A., Roxbury.
1865. Crane, Charles N., West Cam-
bridge.
1832. Crane, Joshua, Boston.
1847. Crapo, Henry H., New Bed-
ford.
1851. Crocker, Frederick, Barnstable.
1849. Crocker, Hezekiah B., Brighton.
1844. Crocker, Uriel, Boston.
1848. Crockett, Selden, Boston.
1863. Croker, J., Dorchester.
1847. Crooker, Ralph, Roxbury.
1850. Crosby, Josiali, AVest Cam-
bridge.
1853. Cross, R. A., Boston.
1867. Crowell, Philander, Chelsea.
1871. Crowell, R. H.. Chelsea.
1846. Crowley, Daniel, Brookline.
1846. Crowninshield, George C, Bos-
ton.
1834. Cruft, Edward, jun., Boston.
1860. Cruiekshanks, James, Maiden.
1859. Cruiekshanks, James T., Rox-
bury.
1860. Cummings, Amos, jun., Read-
ing.
1843. Cummings, John, jun., Boston.
1865. Cummings, Nathaniel, Boston.
1848. Cunningham, Francis, Milton.
1S50. Curtis, Charles F., Jamaica
Plain.
1849. Curtis, Daniel T., Boston.
1829. Curtis, Edward, Pepperell.
1867. Curtis, George S., Jamaica
Plain.
1875. Curtis, Joseph H., Jamaica
Plain.
1830. Curtis, Nathaniel, Roxbury.
1862. Curtis, Samuel W., Dorchester.
1831. Curtis, William, Newton.
1864. Cushing, John G., Belmont.
1864. Cushing, Robert M., Belmont.
1847. Cushing, Thomas P., Boston.
1845. Cutter, Edward F., Sornerville.
1855. Cutter, George B., Weston.
1848. Daggett, Henry C, Boston.
1864. Dale, Eben, Boston.
1865. Dalton, Henry L., Boston.
1848. Dana, Francis, Roxbury.
1865. Dana, John H., Brookline.
1865. Dana, Luther, Newton.
1847. Dana, Nathaniel, Brookline.
1861. Dana, Thomas, Brighton.
1845. Dane, John, Boston.
1857. Daniell, Ellery C, Dedham.
1864. Daniell, Henry W., Boston.
1837. Daniell, Josiah, Boston.
1837. Daniell, Otis, Boston.
1866. Darling, Charles K., Boston.
1874. Darling, Moses, jun., South Bos-
ton.
1845. Darracott, George, Boston.
1800. Davenport, Edward, Dorchester.
1841. Davenport, George, Boston.
1872. Davenport, George E., Boston.
1866. Davenport, Henry, Roxbury.
1855. Davenport, Jeruthmael, Brook-
line.
1846. Davenport, Lewis, Milton.
1847. Davis, Adolphus, Boston.
1S46. Davis, Barnabas, Boston.
1861. Davis, Benjamin B., Brookline.
1829. Davis, B. J., Boston.
1847. Davis, Charles B., Brookline.
1870. Davis, Curtis, Cambridge.
1846. Davis, Dorrance, Boston.
1837. Davis, Edward S., Lynn.
1849. Davis, Franklin A., Milton.
1S73. Davis, Frederick, Newton.
1859. Davis, Hervey, Cambridgeport
1830. Davis, Isaac P., Boston.
508
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1875. Davis, James, Boston.
1830. Davis, lion. .Tuhn, Boston.
1829. Davis, John B., Boston.
1871. Davis, Miss M. E., East Somer-
Villr.
1833. Davis, X. Morton, Plymouth.
1855. Davis, Beth, West Newton.
1871. Davis, T. M., Cambridgeport.
is;.-,. Davis, Dr. William A., Dor-
chest IT.
1848. Davis, William n., Milton.
1872. Dawson, Jackson, West Rox-
bury.
18G7. Day, George B., Boston.
1855. Dean, A. J., Roxbury.
1842. Deane, John, jun., Boston.
1829. Dearborn, Gen. Henry, Roxbury.
18G5. Dehlois, Stephen G., Boston.
1847. Decker, Louis, Boston.
1840. Delcon, Nicholas, Brighton.
18G7. Dennison, E. W., Newtonville.
1845. Dennison, J. N., Boston.
1873. Denny, Clarence n., Boston.
1849. Denny, Daniel, Boston.
1847. Denny, Edward, Boston.
1805. Denny, Francis P., Brookline.
1845. Denny, George, Weston.
1845. Denny, II. B., Boston.
1870. Denton, Ehen, Braintree.
1829. Derby, John, Salem.
1867. Dowson, Francis A., Boston.
1847. Dexter, Anson, Boston.
1805. Dexter, F. Gordon, Boston.
1858. Dexter, George M., Boston.
1851. Dickerman, George H., Somer-
ville.
1860. Dickinson, Alexander, Cam-
bridgeport.
1806. Dike, Charles C, Stoneham.
1874. Dike, George W., Stoneham.
1847. Dike, Solon, Stoneham.
1839. Dillaway, Charles K., Boston.
1854. Dimmock, John L., Boston.
1873. Dix, Joseph, Boston.
1840. Dixwell, John J., Boston.
1865. Dodge, John F., Charlestown.
1SI7. Donald, John, Brighton.
L866. Doogue, William, Boston.
L864. Dorr, George, Dorchester.
1847. Douglass, Robert, Cambridge.
]S7.">. Dove, Miss Clara L., Andover.
1873. Dove, George W. W., Andover.
1862. Downe, Sumner, Maiden.
1845. Downer, Samuel, jun., Dorches-
tlT.
1833. Downes, John, Boston.
1875. Downes, Mrs. S. M., Andover.
1846. Doyle, William, Roxbury.
1871. Draper, James, Worcester.
1848. Driver, Stephen, jun., Salem.
1877. Dudley, Daniel, Brookline.
1837. Duncan, James, Haverhill.
1804. Duncklee, Betsey, Brighton.
1845. Duncklee, George, Brighton.
1864. Duncklee, Harriet G., Brighton.
1864. Dupee, James A., Brookline.
1804. Durant, William, Boston.
1852. Durfee, George B., Fall River.
1850. Durfee, Nathan, Fall River.
1841. Dutton, Henry W., Boston.
1807. Dutton, William H., Boston.
1803. Dwight, Benjamin F , Boston.
1S75. Dwight, Dana F., Boston.
1863. D'Wolf, John L., Roxbury.
1853. Dyer, A. N., Abington.
1831. Dyer, Ezekiel D., Roxbury.
1871. Dyer, N. N., South Abington.
1830. Eager, William, Boston.
1833. Eastburn, John n., Boston.
1865. Eaton, George, Quiney.
1870. Eaton, Horace, Quiney.
1855. Eaton, Jacob, Cambridgeport.
1865. Eaton, Russell P., Dorchester.
1845. Eaton, William, Boston.
1837. Eddy, Caleb, Boston.
1871. Edgar, William, Newtonville.
1845. Edmands, J. W., Boston.
1865. Edson, William, Boston.
1829. Edwards, Elisha, Springfield.
1845. Edwards, Henry, Boston.
1845. Edwards, Thomas, Boston.
1878. Eldridge, Azariah, Yarmouth-
port.
1840. Eldridge, Charles H., Brighton.
1801. Eldridge, E. H., Boston.
1844. Eldridge, J. S., Milton.
1846. Eliot, Samuel A., Boston.
1860. Ellicott, J. P., Jamaica Plain.
1870. Elliot, C. D., West Newton.
1831. Fllis, Charles, Roxhury.
1850. Ellis, George W., Boston.
1848. Ellis, Jonathan, Boston.
1843. Emerson, Benjamin D., Jamaica
Plain.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
509
1847. Emerson, E. C, Boston. j 1865.
1841. Emerson, EL, South Reading. 1830.
1845. Emery C, Dorchester. j 18G5.
1864. Emrnons, John A., West Rox- j
bury. ; I860.
1845. Emmons, John L., Boston.
1848. Emmons, Nathaniel II., Lowell, j 1847.
1871. Endicott, William E., Canton.
1829. Endicott, William P., Danvers. 1865.
1858. Estabrook, J. A., Belmont. 1846.
1829. Eustis, James, South Reading. 1855.
1837. Eustis, William T., Boston. 1S66.
1866. Evans, W. J. R., West Roxbury. 1845.
1845. Eveleth, Joseph, Boston. 1851.
1829. Everett, Edward, Boston. 1829.
1855. Everett, George, Concord. 1865.
1847. Everett, Otis, jun., Boston. 1871.
1864. Everett, William, Roxbury. 1871.
1848. Evers, Gustav, Watertown.
1872. Ewings, Luther B., Boston. 1874.
1847. Fairbanks, Henry P., Boston. 1871.
1865. Fairbanks, Josiah L., Boston. 1830.
1843. Fairbanks, Stephen, Boston. 1864.
1862. Falconer, James, Roxbury. 1869.
1874. Falconer, John, Rochester. 1860.
1877. Falconer, William, Cambridge. 1841.
1876. Fales, Joel F., Walpole. 1863.
1864. Farlow, John S., Newton. 1867.
1865. Farmer, Elbridge, West Cam- 1861.
bridge. 1853.
1846. Farnsworth, Walter, Boston. 1853.
1865. Farrar, Abijah W., Boston. 1842.
1864. Farrier, Amasa, Stoneham. 1829.
1869. Farrier, Mrs. Cynthia, Stone- 1846.
ham. 1845.
1873. Faxon, John, Quincy. 1854.
1832. Faxon, Nathaniel, Boston. 1865.
1866. Fay, Henry G., Brookline. 1871.
1845. Fay, Isaac, Cambridge.
1875, Fay, Mrs. Rebekah L., Chelsea. 1847.
1830. Fay, Samuel P. P., Cambridge. 1865.
1845. Fearing, Albert, Boston. 1857.
1835. Felt, Oliver L., Boston. 1870.
1869. Felton, Arthur W., West New- 1865.
ton. 1845.
1838. Fenno, John, Chelsea. 1829.
1864. Fenno, J. B., Boston. 1847.
1867. Fenno, Joseph H., North Chel- 1864.
sea. 1866.
1S73. Fenno, Thomas L., Somerville. 1830.
1877. Fenno, Warren, Revere. 1858.
1852. Fessenden, Charles B., Boston. 1864.
Fewkes, Edwin, Newton.
Field, Joseph, Weston.
Fillebrown, John, West Cam-
bridge.
Fisher, Daniel Simmons, Rox-
bury.
Fisher, Ebenezer Shortland,
Dedham.
Fisher, Francis K , Brookline.
Fisher, Freeman, Dedham.
Fisher, George, Cambridge.
Fisher, James, Roxbury.
Fisher, Warren, Roxbury.
Fiske, Robert T. P., Hingham.
Fitch, Jeremiah, Boston.
Flagg, Augustus, Boston.
Fleming, Edwin, West Newton.
Fleming, William, West New-
ton.
Fletcher, Edwin, Acton.
Fletcher, John W., Chelsea.
Fletcher, Richard, Boston.
Flint, Charles L., Boston.
Flint, David B., Watertown.
Flynn, Edward, Lawrence.
Flynt, William N, Mouson.
Foley, Bernard, Roxbury.
Follen, Charles, Boston.
Fontarive, J. J., Boston.
Forbush, Jonathan, Bolton.
Ford, Elisha B., Boston.
Ford, Enos, Dedham.
Fosdick, David, Charlestown.
Foster, James G., Charlestown.
Foster, John K. H., Boston.
Foster, Joseph W., Dorchester.
Foster, Joshua T., Medford.
Foster, Nathaniel, jun., Bel-
mont.
Foster, Thomas R., Boston.
Fowle, Henry D., Boston.
Fowle, Seth W., Brookline.
Fowle, William B., Auburndale.
Fox, Joseph N., Cambridge.
Francis, David, Boston.
Francis, J. B., Warwick, R.I.
Frazer, Amherst A., Boston.
Freeland, Charles W., Boston.
Freeman, Abraham , Dorchester.
Freeman, Russell, New Bedford.
French, Asa, Braintree.
French, Henry F., Boston.
>10
UIIUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
is:;n. French, Jonathan, Dorchester.
1870. French, J. D. Williams, Boston.
1863. French, William E., Boston.
Frink, Dr. Charles T., Roxbury.
1865 Frost, George, West Newton.
I860. Frost, Itnfus 8., Chelsea.
1867. Frost, Stiles, West Newton.
1864. Frost, Yarnuin, Belmont.
1867. Frothingham, Isaac n., Dor-
clii ster.
1860. Frothingham, Samuel, Winter
Hill.
1855. Fuller, Henry A., Cambridge.
1857. Fuller. Henry Weld, Boxbury.
1874. Fuller, William G., Stoneham.
1865. Furneaux, Charles, Melrose.
1846. Fussell, John, Jamaica Plain.
1845. Gaffield, James, Gloucester.
1857. Gage, Addison, West Cam-
bridge.
1867. Gage, Edmund, Bradford.
1870. Gage, Edwin V., Bradford.
1855. Galvin, John, Somerville.
1857. Gammell, John, Lexington.
1868. Gane, Henry A., West Newton.
1855. Gannett, W. W., Dover.
1873. Gardiner, Claudius B., West
Newbury.
1845. Gardner, Francis, Boston.
1864. Gardner, Henry N., Belmont.
is 15. Gardner, John, Boston.
1838. Gardner, Joseph H., Roxbury.
1873. Garfield, Charles, Medford.
1851. Gassett, Henry, Wrentham.
1864. Cant, Samuel N., Boston.
18G6. Gay, Timothy, Chelsea.
1865. Gerry, C. F.,Tlorcliester.
1800. Gibbens, Samuel H., Boston.
1829. Gibbs, Benjamin, Boston.
1869. Gibbs, O. C, West Newton.
1870. Gibbs, Wolcott, Cambridge.
1848. Gibbs, W. P., Lexington.
1846. Gibson, Kimball, Boston.
1868. Gilbert, B. W., Boston.
1861. Gilbert, John, Boston.
I lilbert, J., Roxbury.
1860. Gilbert, Samuel, jun., Boston.
1873. Gilbert, W. A., Neponset.
1859. Gilchrist, D. L., Boston.
1867. Gilkey, R. v.. Watertown.
1865. Gill, Mrs. F. M., M.-dford.
1865. Gillard, William, Boston.
1802. Gilley, John E. M., Boston.
1845. Gilmore, Addison, Boston.
1864. Gilmore, Arthur, Boston.
1845. Gilmore. George L., Newton.
1861. Gilmore, Josiah, jun., Newton
Corner.
1870. Gilson, F. Howard, Somerville.
1808. Gleason, C. W., Boston.
1865. Gleason, Herbert, Maiden.
1871. Glover, Albert, Boston.
1865. Clover, Edward \\\. Maiden.
1864. Glover. Horatio N., Dorchester.
1870. Glover, John J., Quincy.
1863. Glover, Joseph B., Boston.
1864. Godbold, Gustavua A., Chelsea.
1S66. Goddard, A. Warren, Brookline.
1870. Goddard, Mrs. Mary T., Newton.
1849. Goddard, Thomas, Boston.
1805. Goldsmith, Franklin L., Rox-
bury.
1860. Goodrich, Daniel O., Boston.
18G8. Goodwin, Lester, Dorchester.
1829. Goodwin, Thomas J., Charles-
town.
1841. Gordon, George W., Boston.
1839. Gordon, John, Boston.
1865. Gorham, J. L., Jamaica Plain.
18">5. Gould, Benjamin A., Boston.
1831. Gould, Daniel, Reading.
18G8. Gould, Francis, Arlington.
1864. Gould, Samuel, Boston.
1829. Gourgas, J. M., Weston.
1869. Gove, George G., Cambridge.
1832. Grant, B. B., Boston.
1847. Grant, Charles E., Roxbury.
1S55. Grant, E. B., Watertown.
1868. Graves, Frank H., West New-
ton.
187.". Gray, Edward, Boston.
1846. Gray, George II., Boston.
1847. Gray, Horace, Boston.
1877. Gray, Howard, Dorchester.
1831. Gray, Jacob, Boston.
1860. Gray, James, Needham.
1831. Gray, John, Boston.
1847. Gray, Otis Arthur, Hingham.
18GG. Gray, Samuel S., Roxbury.
1876. Gray. William, jun., Dorchester.
1861. Gray, William, 3d, Dorchester.
1S59. Gregory, James J. II., Marble-
head.
1841. Green, Dr. John, Worcester.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
511
1844. Green, Matthew W., Jamaica
Plain.
1S66. Greene, Franklin, Jamaica
Plain.
1850. Greene, "William A., Dorchester.
1846. Greenough, D. S., Dorchester.
1864. Greenwood, E. H., Newton
Centre.
1859 Greig, George, Newton.
1861. Grew, Henry, Dorchester.
1865. Griffin, J. Q. A., Medford.
1845. Griffith, James, Gloucester.
1855. Griggs, Charles, Boston.
1845. Grinnell, Hon. Joseph, New
Bedford.
1846. Groom, Thomas, Dorchester.
1834. Grosvenor, Lemuel P., Boston.
1858. Grundel, Hermann, Dorcliester.
1871. Guerineau, Louis, Cambridge.
1856. Guild, Augustus, Boston.
1830. Guild, Benjamin, Boston.
1857. Guild, Chester, Somerville.
1866. Guild, J. Anson, Brookline.
1865. Hadley, T. Brooks, Stoneham.
1876. Hadwen, Obadiah B., Worces-
ter.
1829. Haggerston, David, Charles-
town.
1872. Haines, Eohert J., Boston.
1856. Haley, Jesse, Cambridgeport.
1848. Hall, Adin, Boston.
1851. Hall, Charles, Medford.
1830. Hall, Dudley, Medford.
1873. Hall, Edwin A., Cambridgeport.
1864. Hall, George H., North Chelsea.
1863. Hall, George R., Boston.
1874. Hall, H. H., Lawrence.
1864. Hall, J ere F., Maiden.
1847. Hall, Jesse, Cambridge.
1865. Hall, John R., Roxbury.
1874. Hall, Lewis, Cambridge.
1863. Hall, Peter C, Medford.
1864. Hall, Stephen A., North Chel-
sea.
1846. Hall, Theodore N., Boston.
1867. Hall, William F., Brookline.
1865. Hall, William T., North Chelsea.
1839. Hallett, George, Boston.
1856. Halley, Thomas D., Watertown.
1867. Halliday, William H., Boston.
1873. Hamlin, Delwin A., South Bos-
ton.
1864. Hammond, Gardner G., Boston.
1865. Hammond, Samuel, Boston.
1858. Hancock, Mrs. Catharine, Rox-
bury.
1849. Hanson, Moses P., South Read-
ing.
1863. Harding, C. L., Cambridge.
1NC3. Harding, George W., Dorches-
ter.
1S69. Harding, Lewis B., Boston.
1857. Harding, Newell, Boston.
1862 Harding, Newell, Somerville.
1862. Harding, W. C, Roxbury.
1871. Hardy, F. D., jun., Cambridge-
port.
1843. Hardy, Seth E., Cambridge.
1853. Harmond, Eben S., Somerville.
1865. Harnden, S., Reading.
1851. Harrington, Bowen, Lexington.
1862. Harrington, William H., Salem.
1S64. Harris, Charles, Cambridge.
1858. Harris, Miss Ellen M., Jamaica
Plain.
1865. Harris, Frederick L., West Need-
ham.
1869. Harris, Horatio, Boston.
1845. Harris, Richard D., Boston.
1850. Harris, William A., Dorchester.
1829. Hartshorn, EliphaletP., Boston.
1842. Hartwell, C. W., Andover.
1865. Hartwell, Samuel, Lincoln.
1863. Harwood, Daniel, Dorchester.
1875. Harwood, George S., Newton.
1875. Haskell, Edward, New Bedford.
1S45. Hastings, Edmund T., jun.,
Medford.
1S64. Hastings, John, Lexington.
1848. Hastings, Thomas, East Cam-
bridge.
1849. Hatch, Anthony, Saugus.
1855. Hatch, Samuel, Boston.
1860. Hathaway, Seth W., Marble-
head.
1871. Haughton, James, Boston.
1849. Haven, Alfred W., Portsmouth,
N.H.
1848. Haven, Henry P., New London,
Conn.
1834. Hayden, Frederick, Lincoln.
1871. Hayes, Daniel F., Exeter, N.H.
1866. Hayes, Francis B., Boston.
1870. Hayes, John L., Cambridge.
512
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
I860, Hayes, Joseph II., Boston.
1833. Hayward, Charles, Boston.
1830. Hayward, George,M.D.,Boston.
1864. Hayward, George P., Hingham.
1864. Hayward, James T., Roxbury.
1844. Hazeltine, Hazen, Boston.
1860. Hazelton, II. I,., Newton.
18G5. Head, Charles IX. Brookline.
1848. Healy, Mark, Lynn.
1849. Heard, Charles, Brighton.
1866. Heath, Charles, Brookline.
1865. Heath, George W., Melrose.
1829. Heath, John, Roxbury.
L832. Hedge, Csaao L., Plymouth.
1847. Hemmenway, Benjamin, Dor-
chester.
1848. Hendee, Charles J., Roxbury.
1845. Henshaw, John, Cambridge.
1848. Henshaw, Samuel, Boston.
1863. Hersey, Alfred C, Hingham.
1878. Hersey, Alfred II., Hingham.
1858. Ileustis, Warren, Belmont.
1847. Hewins, Charles A., Roxbury.
1845. Hewins, Whiting, Roxbury.
1868. Ibws, Albert II., Weston.
1869. Higbee, Charles II., Salem.
1830. Higginson, nenry, Boston.
1866. Hilbourn, A. J., Chelsea.
1865. Hill, Benjamin D., jun., South
Danvers.
1864. Hill, George, "West Cambridge.
1860. Hill, Henry Y., Belmont.
1847. Hill, James, Somerville.
1841. Hill, John, Boston.
1865. Hill, John, Stoneham.
1878. Hill, Miss Katie A., Lowell.
lsis. Hill, William, South Boston.
1865. Hillard, George S., Boston.
1866. Hilton, William, Boston.
18(50. Hitchings, Ebenezer H, Boston.
1874. llittinger, Mrs. Mary E., Bel-
mont.
18G6. Hodgdon, R. L., West Cam-
bridge.
1832. Hodge, James L., Taunton.
1866. Hodgkins, John E., Chelsea.
1860. Hogan, John, Belmont.
1851. H. .11. rook, Caleb S., Randolph.
1870. Holbrook, G. L.. Boston.
1865. Holden, 0. IT., WestNewton.
1829. Hollingsworth, Mark. Milton.
1860. Hollis, J. W., Brighton.
1865. Hollis, Thomas, Boston.
1845. Hollis, Thomas, jun., Milton.
1856. Ilolman, R. W., Newton Corner.
1864. Holmes, G. W., Boston.
1876. Holt, Mrs. S. A., Winchester.
1854. Ilolton, Lemuel, Boston.
1S7:> Hooper, Francis A., Marble-
head.
1845. Hooper, John, jun., Marble-
head.
1847. Hooper, Nathaniel, Boston.
1845. Hooper, R. C, Boston.
1865. Hooper, Thomas, Bridgewater.
1865. norne, C. F., Watertown.
1870. Horner, Mrs. C. N. S., George-
town.
1865. Horr, John E., Brookline.
1845. norton, Henry K., Boston.
1834. Hosmer, Hammond II., Lexing-
ton.
1844. Hosmer, Hiram, Watertown.
1S4(). Hosmer, Zelotes, Boston.
1829. Houghton. Abel, jun., Lynn.
1863. Houghton, Francis, Somerville.
1S49. House, Timothy, Dorchester.
1846. Houston, John, Charlestown.
1872. Hovey, Charles H, Cambridge.
1833. Hovey, Charles M., Cambridge.
1839. Hovey, John, Roxbury.
1860. Hovey, John C, Cambridge-
port.
1849. Hovey, Joseph F., Charlestown.
1829. Hovey, P. B., jun., Cambridge-
port.
1849. Howard, Benjamin, Boston.
1836. Howard, John C, M.D., Brook-
line.
ISO."). Ho ward, Joseph, South Boston.
1853. Howe, Estes, M.D., Cambridge.
1846. Howe, George, Roxbury.
1831. Howe, Hall J., Boston.
1845. Howe, Jabez C, Boston.
1843. Howe, John, Brookline.
1847. Howe, Joseph, East Cambridge.
1851. Howe, Samuel G., M.D., South
Boston.
1854. Howland, Henry, Maiden.
1829. Howland, John, jun., New Bed-
ford.
1873. Hubbard, Charles T., Boston.
1846. Hubbard, G. G., West Need-
ham.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
513
1858. Hubbard, Gardiner Greene,
Cambridge.
18G5. Hubbard, J. C, Boston.
1864. Hubbard, Joel W., Boston.
1847. Hubbard, William J., Boston.
1849. Huckius, James, Roxbury.
18G0. Humphrey, Francis J., Dorches-
ter.
1875. Humphrey, George "W., Dcd-
ham.
1871. Humphrey, John, Marlborough.
1857. Hunneman, John J., Roxbury.
18G9. Hunneman, Joseph H., Bos-
ton.
1857. Himnewell, H. H., West Need-
ham.
1837. Hunnewell, James, Charles-
town.
1845. Hunt, Charles S., Boston.
1829. Hunt, Ebenezer, M.D., North-
ampton.
1867. Hunt, Edmund S., Weymouth.
1866. Hunt, Franklin, Boston.
1864. Hunt, Moses, Boston.
1871. Hunt, S. C, Somerville.
1845. Huntington, Rev. F. D., Rox-
bury.
1829. Hurd, William, Charlestown.
1865. Hutchins, Ezra C, Newton.
1864. Hyde, George, Charlestown.
1848. Hyde, James F. C, Newton.
1834. Hyde, Samuel, jun., Newton.
1831. Hyslop, David, Brookline.
1865. Inches, Henderson, Boston.
1865. Inches, H. B., M.D., Boston.
1847. Ingersoll, James, Boston.
1863. Ireland, G. W., Somerville.
1864. Jackson, Abraham, Boston.
1829. Jackson, James, M.D., Boston.
1864. James, William E., Jamaica
Plain.
1S69. Jameson, G. W., East Lexing-
ton.
1873. Janvrin, William S., Revere.
1867. Jaques, George, Boston.
1846. Jarves, Deming, Sandwich.
1863. Jeffries, John, jun., Boston.
1865. Jeuks, Charles W., Boston.
1844. Jenks, John H , Newburyport.
1852. Jenney, William P., Fairhaven.
1853. Jennings, Levi, Newton Lower
Falls.
1874. Johnson, Francis M., Newton
Centre.
1873. Johnson, H. A., Jamaica Plain.
1S32. Johnson, Otis, Savannah, Ga.
1829. Johnson, Samuel R., Charles-
town.
1850. Johnson, William, Boston.
1850. Johnson, William B., Hingham.
1855. Jones, C. F., Roxbury.
1846. Jones, Cyrus W., Boston.
1866. Jones, George H, Newton.
1845. Jones, James L., Chelsea.
1833. Jones, Llewellyn David, New
Bedford.
18C5. Jones, Moses, Brookline.
1845. Jones, Dr. Thomas, Boston.
1865. Jordan, Samuel, Andover.
1865. Josselyn, Alonzo, Roxbury.
1834. Josselyn, Lewis, Boston.
1830. Joy, Joseph G., Boston.
1866. Joyce, Mrs. Samuel, Medford.
1866. Kakas, Edward, Medford.
1859. Keith, W. W., Boston.
1856. Kelley, E. G., M.D., Newbury-
port.
1859. Kelley, John, Watertown.
1830. Kellie, William, Boston.
1876. Kelsey, Fred W., Waverly, N.Y.
1846. Kelt, James, jun., Boston.
1848. Kendall, D. S., Boston.
1868. Kendall, Edward, Cambridge-
port.
1865. Kendall, Isaac B., Somerville.
1863. Kendall, Jonas, Framingham.
1874. Kendall, J. P., Woburn.
1867. Kendrick, H. P., Longwood.
1873. Kendrick, Mrs. H. P., Allston.
1865. Kennard, Charles W., Boston.
1856. Kennard, M. Parry, Brookline.
1868. Kennedy, George G., Dorches-
ter.
1854. Kennedy, John M., Wareham.
1866. Kent, John, Charlestown.
1864. Kenrick, Miss Anna C, Newton.
1833. Kenrick, Enoch B., Newton.
1832. Kenrick, John A. Newton.
1865. Keon, Frank V. B.. Cambridge.
1865. Keyes, E. W., Charlestown.
1865. Keyes, George, Concord.
1864. Kidder, Henry P., Boston.
1831. Kidder, Samuel, Charlestown.
1845. Kimball, A. P., Boston.
514
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1\m, Kimball, Charles, "Winchester.
1861. King, C W., Boston.
lsiT. King, I'... Boston.
1846. King, Franklin, Dorchester.
1830. King, John, Medford.
King, John, Dedham.
Kingman, Aimer, Boston.
L863. Kingman, Abner A., South Bos-
ton.
1871. Kingman, C. D., Middlebor-
ough.
1841. Kingsbury, William B., Rox-
bnry.
1848. Kinsley, Lyman, Canton.
1863. Kirmes, C, Melrose.
1849. Kittredge, Alvah, Roxbury.
1862. Kittredge, B. A., Boston.
1862. Kneeland, Samuel, juu., M.D.,
Boston.
1864. Knott, James, Boston.
1840. Lackey, Andrew, Marblehead.
1865. Ladd, W. 0-., Jan., Watertown.
18G4. Lake, F. J., Grantvillo.
1839. Lamb, John A. W., Boston.
is 17. Lamb, Thomas, Boston.
1868. Lamprell, Simon, Marblehead.
1859. Lamson, Ruf us, Cambridgeport.
1865, Lancaster, Charles B., Newton.
18G4. Lane, J. C, Boston.
1866. Langmaid, S. P., Charlestown.
1866. Langworthy, Rev. Isaac P.,
Chelsea.
1804. Laughton, Charles II., West
Roxbury.
1873. Law, Q. A., Roslindale.
1831. Lawrence, Amos, Boston.
1870. Lawrence, Amos A., Brookline.
1864. Lawrence, Edward, Charles-
town.
Lawrence, James, Boston.
1876. Lawrence, .lames, Groton.
is7.">. Lawrence, John, Boston.
1842. Lawrence, Samuel Abbott, Bos-
ton.
1862. Lawson, Peter, Lowell.
1867. Lawton, William, Brookline.
1848. Leach, Bev. Daniel, Roxbury.
1864, Leavens, E. W., Maiden.
1846. Leavens, S. Davis, South Bos-
ton.
1869. Leavitt, Charles B., Dorchester.
18G5. Leavitt, Thomas, South Maiden.
1875. Lee, Francis II. Salem.
18C0. Lee, Francis L., Brookline.
1838. Lee, George, Watertown.
Lee. Henry, Boston.
1831. Lee, John C, Salem.
1848. Leeds, Samuel, South Boston.
1841. Leighton, Thomas, East Cam-
bridge.
1847. Leighton, Thomas, jun., East
Cambridge.
1S47. Leighton, William, Concord.
1829. Leland, Daniel P., Sherburne.
1850. Leland, George, Roxbury.
1871. Lenime, Frederick, North Cam-
bridge.
1866. Leonard, George, West Rox-
bury.
1850. Leonard, Joseph, Boston.
1831. Leonard, Thomas, Salem.
1860. Lerned, T. P., Cambridgeport,
1852. Leuchars, Robert B., Roxbury.
1846. Lewis, A. S., Roxbury.
18G3. Lewis, C. P., Dorchester.
1845. Lewis, William G., Boston.
1854. Lincoln, Calvin A., Hingham.
1849. Lincoln, Daniel Waldo, Worces-
ter.
1849.' Lincoln, Frederick W.. Canton.
1S56. Lincoln, Frederick W., jun.,
Boston.
1864. Lincoln, George, jun., Hing-
ham.
18G5. Lincoln, William, Brookline.
1845. Little, Charles C, Boston.
1S29. Little, Col. Henry, Bucksport,
Me.
1830. Little, Samuel, Bucksport, Me.
1845. Livermore, Aaron, Boston.
18ti5. Livermore, George, Boston.
1831. Livermore, Isaac, Boston.
1873. Livermore, Miss Maria, Mount
Auburn.
l.S4fi. Liversedge, nenry, Milton.
1846. Liversedge, Thomas, Milton.
1847. Lloyd, James, Boston.
18G6. Locke, B. Delmont, West Cam-
bridge.
1806. Locke, William A., Belmont.
1854. Lockwood, B. G.. Charlestown.
1858. Lodge, Giles II., M.D., Boston.
1875. Loftns, John T., Boston.
1854. Lombard, Israel, Newton,
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
515
1857. Lombard, I., jun., "West New-
ton.
Long, John H. B., Dorchester.
. Loomis, Jason B., Chelsea.
. Lord, George C, Newton.
. Lord, Rev. Daniel M., Boston.
. Loring, Alfred, South Hingham.
. Loriug, Benjamin G., Boston.
. Loring, Caleb W., Boston.
Loring, Charles G., Boston.
Loring, Charles G., Boston.
Loring, George B., Salem.
Loring, John A., Boston.
Loring, "William J., Boston.
Lothrop, David W., West Med-
ford.
Lothrop, Eben W., Chelsea.
Lothrop, H. A., Sharon,
Lothrop, John, Dedham.
Lothrop, Thornton K., Boston.
Lovett, George L., Beverly.
Lovett, Josiah, 2d, Beverly.
Low, Ariel, Roxbury.
Low, John J., Boston.
Lowder, John, "Watertown.
Lowell, Augustus, Boston.
Lowell, John, Newton.
Lowell, William B., Newton.
Luke, Elijah H., Cambridge-
port.
Lumb, William, Boston.
Lunt, Charles H., "West Rox-
bury.
Lyman, Theodore, Brookline.
Lynde, Stephen EL, Winchester.
Lyon, Dr. Henry, Charlestown.
Mackay, John, Boston.
Mackintosh, Roger S., West
Roxbury.
Macondray, Frederick W., Dor-
chester.
Macrae, William, Boston.
Magoon, A. B., Cambridge.
Mahoney, John, Boston.
Maier, George H., Newton.
Maloon, "William, Salem.
Mandell, J. W., Roxbury.
Maun, Dr. Benjamin, Roxbury.
Mann, James F., Cambridge.
Mann, J. N. E., Dedham.
Mann, Jonathan, South Boston.
Mann, Samuel C, Dedham.
18G3
1861
18G5.
1845,
1865,
1846.
1871.
1845.
1870.
1864.
1866.
1832.
1864.
1854.
1876.
1857.
1865.
1855.
1839.
1855.
1836.
1855.
1863.
1865.
1845.
1860.
1874.
1871.
1870.
1859.
1845.
1830.
1844.
1840.
1 1850.
1 1853.
1868.
1 1864.
1865.
1846.
1867.
1873.
1843.
1850.
1841.
1858
1847
1874
1848,
1857,
1842
1805,
1871.
1844,
1851,
1876.
1860.
1866.
1860.
1850.
1857.
1805.
1849.
1855.
1871.
1833.
1863.
1865.
1847.
1854.
1829.
1869.
1870.
1860.
1862.
1863
1865,
1864.
1870.
1841.
1833.
1866.
1840.
1852.
1857.
1829.
1830.
1872.
1866.
1871.
Manning, Jacob W., Reading.
Manning, Joseph, Boston.
Manning, Lydia I!., Heading.
Manning, Robert, Salem.
Mansfield, Henry S.,Blackstone
March, Andrew S., Roxbury.
March, George L., Watertown.
Markoe, George F. H., Boston.
Marland, John, Andover.
Marsh, Francis, Dedham.
Marshall, Frederick, Everett.
Martin, B. N., Boston.
Martin, Darius A., Chelsea.
Martin, John S., Boston.
Martin, Nathaniel, Brighton.
Martin, Richard S., Boston.
Martin, Valentine, Boston.
Marvin, T. R., Boston.
Mason, John, Cambrldgeport.
Mason, Robert M., Boston.
Mason, Thomas, Charlestown.
Matthews, Nathan, Boston.
May, F. W. G., Boston.
May, Samuel, Boston.
Mayhew, A. C, Boston.
McCarthy, Edmund, Brighton.
McCarthy, Timothy, Boston.
McClure, John, North Chelsea.
McDermott, Andrew, Roxbury.
McDonald, Alexander, Hing-
ham.
McGee, James B., South Dan-
vers.
Mclntire, James, Maiden.
Mclntire, Joseph, Melrose.
Mcintosh, Aaron S., Boston.
Mcintosh, William, Boston.
Mclntyre, Dauiel, Cambridge-
port.
McLaren, Anthony, West Rox-
bury.
McLennan, Alexander, Water-
town.
McMullen, William, Cambridge.
McTear, James, Roxbury.
Meade, Isaac W., Charlestown.
Meade, Samuel O., West Cam-
bridge.
Meisel, Augustus, Boston.
Melcher, William K., Brook-
line.
Mellen, George M., Brookline.
516
1838.
1831.
1845.
1st.-,,
is: l.
1865.
1873.
1865.
18G0.
1864.
1857.
1847.
1873.
L845.
1845.
1830.
1863.
1865.
1847.
1831.
1863.
1845.
1869.
1860.
1847.
1855.
1847.
1866.
1872.
1845.
1830.
1848.
1864.
187::.
1876.
1852.
1871,
1848.
1S60.
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Mellen, James, Cambridgeport.
Miller, William, Roxbury.
Melville, Thomas, Boston.
Merriam, Charles, Boston,
Merriam, Galen, West Newton.
Merriam, Herbert, Weston.
Merriam, John M., Cambridge-
port.
Merriam, M. H., Lexington.
Merrick, John M., jnn., Wal-
pole.
Merrilield, William T., Worces-
ter.
Merrill, Joseph, jun., Roxbury.
Merrill, J. Warren, Cainbridge-
port.
Merrill, S. A., Salem.
Merrill, William W., Boston.
Metcalf, Albert, Boston.
Millar, John L., Boston.
Miller, David, South Boston.
Miller, Edward, Quincy.
Miller, Erasmus U., M.D., Dor-
chester.
Miller, William, East Boston.
Mills, Charles II., Boston.
Mills, James K., Boston.
Mills, John F., Boston.
Mills, Lewis, Boston.
Mills, William, Somerville.
Milmore, Martin, Boston.
Milton, William II., Roxbury.
Minot, Charles, Somerville.
Minot, George R., Roxbury.
Minot, William, jun., Boston.
Minton,Jaines, Dorchester.
Minton, Peter J., Roxbury'.
Mixter, Charles, Boston.
Moffat, Z. L., Boston.
Moore, Abel, Concord.
Moore, John B., Concord.
Moraudi, Francis, Maiden.
Morgan, Thomas, Boston.
Morrill, Ambrose, Lexington.
Morris, Thomas D., Boston.
Morrison, Benjamin T., Med-
ford.
Morrison, nugh, Glouci
Morrison, Robert, Marshfleld.
Morse, Enoch R., Somerville.
Morse, II. K., Chelsea.
Morse, O. S., Andover.
1845. Morse, Robert M., Boston.
1 - 15. Morse, Samuel F., Boston.
Morse, Sidney B., Boston.
1868. Morse, William A., Boston.
1S74. Morton, James II., Boston.
1846. Morton, W. T. G., M.D., West
Needham.
1831. Motley, Edward, Boston.
1843. Motley, Thomas, jnn., Dedham.
1S64. Moulton, Charles II., Boston.
1845. Mudge, E. R., Boston.
1859. Mudge, George A., Boston.
1841. Mudge, George W., Lynn.
1S43. Munroe, James, jun., Cam-
bridgeport.
1871. Munroe, James S., Lexington.
1869. Munroe, Otis, Boston.
1867. Munroe, William, Boston.
1862. Murray, Daniel C, Watertown.
1852. Murray, Dennis, Roxbury.
1855. Murray, James, Roxbury.
1855. Murray, Robert, Waltham.
1830. Mussey, Benjamin, Boston.
1844. Muzzey, Rev. Artemas B., Cam-
bridge.
1866. Needham, Daniel, Groton.
1S45. Needham, Thomas, Brighton.
1867. Newbury, William B., Dorches-
ter.
1829. Newell, Joseph W., Maiden.
is:,.".. Newhall, George, Dorchester.
1845. Newhall, John M., Dorchester.
1829. Newman. Henry, Roxbury.
1874. Newman. John R., Winchester.
1874. Newton, Rev. William W.,
Brookline.
1S71. Nichols, Benjamin W., West
Roxbury.
1868. Nichols, Mrs. Frederick, Dor-
chester.
1864. Nichols, nenry, South Boston.
1S66. Nichols, James R., Haverhill.
1829. Nichols, Otis, Dorchester.
1850. Nichols, W. S., Roxbury.
1829. Nicholson, Henry, Brookline.
1845. Nicholson, Com. John B.,
U. S. N., Charlestown.
1851. Nickerson, Joseph, Roxbury.
1S77. Nightingale, Rev. Crawford,
Dorchester.
1873. Northey, William, Medford.
1843. Norton, Joshua, Boston.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBEKS.
517
1877. Norton, Michael H., Boston.
1869. Norton, Patrick, Dorchester.
1S58. Nourse, Benjamin F., Boston.
1865. Nourse, Benjamin F., Cain-
bridgeport.
1364. Noyes, George N., Melrose.
1855. Nudd, Jacob, Cambridge.
1845. Nugent, James, Roxbury.
1869. O'Brien, James, Jamaica Plain.
1865. Odiorne, Frederick H., Maiden.
1849. Odicrne, William H., Billerica.
1866. Oldreive, John R., Chelsea.
1862. Oldreive, Richard, Newton.
1852. Oliver, Henry K., Lawrence.
1847. Oliver, James P., Lynn.
1853. Oliver, Stephen, Lynn.
1830. Oliver, William, Dorchester.
1845. Olmstead, E. Holton, Boston.
1873. Olney, Richard, AVest Roxbury.
1865. Osgood, Benjamin D., Boston.
1864. Osgood, James Ripley, Boston.
1845. Osgood, Peter, Andovcr.
1871. Otis, Mrs. Harrison G., Boston.
1868. Oris, Hon. Theodore, Boston.
1870. Otis, Theodore C, Boston.
1841. Owen, John, Cambridge.
1862. Oxnard, George D., Boston.
1830. Oxnard, Henry, Brookline.
1865. Packer, Charles n., Roxbury.
1859. Page, Edmund, Boston.
1860. Page, J. H.W., Dorchester.
1S42. Paige, James W., Boston.
1867. Paine, Benjamin F., Roxbury.
1830. Paine, Robert Treat, Boston.
1860. Palmer, George W., Needham.
1845. Palmer, John P., Boston.
1864. Palmer, Stevens G., Boston.
1863. Park, John C, Somerville.
1877. Park, William D., Boston.
1849. Parker, Augustus, Roxbury.
1865. Parker, Charles E., Auburn-
dale.
1830. Parker, Daniel P., Boston.
1846. Parker, Harvey D., Boston.
1829. Parker, Isaac, Boston.
1849. Parker, James, Boston.
1864. Parker, John, Boston.
1865. Parker, John M., Charlestown.
1850. Parker, Matthew S., Boston.
1865. Parker, Nelson, Stoneham.
1860. Parker, Theodore D., Brighton.
1830. Parker, Thomas, Dorchester.
1843. Parker, William A., Boston.
1847. Parker, William H., Boston.
1829. Parkinson, John, Roxbury.
1842. Parkman, Rev. Francis, D.D.,
Boston.
1859. Parkman, Francis, Jamaica
Plain.
1837. Parris, Alexander, Boston.
1846. Parsons, William, Boston.
1864. Parsons, William, Boston.
1809. Parsons, William B., Rockport.
1851. Partridge, Henry, Medfield.
1865. Partridge, Horace, Somerville.
1863. Patterson, James, Cambridge.
1830. Payne, Edward W., Boston.
1832. Payne, William E., Boston.
1846. Pay son, Samuel R., Roxbury.
1829. Peabody, Col. Francis, Salem.
1864. Pearce, John, West Roxbury.
1855. Pearman, W. R., Chelsea.
1866. Peck, A. G., West Cambridge.
1866. Peck, O. H., Melrose.
1871. Peck, W. G., Arlington.
1848. Peirce, George, West Cam-
bridge.
1859. Penniman, A. P., Waltham.
1865. Penniman, George, Milton.
1829. Penniman, James, Dorchester.
1875. Perkins, Augustus T., Boston.
1847. Perkins, E. N., Brookline.
1863. Perkins, S. C, Dorchester.
1865. Perkins, T. Henry, Cohasset.
1857. Perkins, William P., Brookline.
1829. Perry, Rev. Gardner B., Brad-
ford.
1873. Perry, George W., Maiden.
1829. Perry, John, Sherburne.
1855. Perry, S. B., East Medford.
1856. Peters, H. H., Southborough.
1864. Pettengill, Thomas S., Brook-
line.
1872. Pfenninger, John, Grantville.
1811. Phelps, Abel, Boston.
1865. Philbrick, Edward S., Brook-
line.
1830. Philbrick, Samuel, Brookline.
1864. Philbrick, William D., Brook-
line.
1878. Phillips, John C, Boston.
1860. Phillips, Nathaniel, Dorchester.
1831. Phillips, Stephen C, Salem.
1830. Phipps, Rufus F., Charlestown.
518 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1835. Phlpps, Samuel, jun., Dorches-
ter.
Phlppsj Samuel, jun., Boston.
Pickman, Dudley L., Salem.
Pierce, Aimer, North Cain-
bridge.
Pierce, Dana, Somerville.
Pierce, George, "West Cam-
bridge.
Pierce, George W., Maiden.
Pierce, Henry L. f Dorchester.
Pierce, Jacob W., Brookline.
Pierce, Samuel B., Dorchester.
Pillsbury, Dr. II. II., Medford.
Piper, Henry, Cambridge.
. Plimpton, Willard P., West
Newton.
. Plummer, William, Lexington.
. ri.viupton, Charles II. P., Bos-
ton.
. Pond, Samuel, Cambridgeport.
• Pond, Samuel M., Bucksport,
Me.
. Pool, Ward, Danvers.
Poole, Benjamin C , Chelsea.
Poor, Benjamin, New York.
Poor, Henry, Boston.
Poor, John R , Somerville.
Pope, Alexander, Dorchester.
Pope, Rev. A. R., Somerville.
Porter, Andrew, South Danvers.
Porter, Z. B., Brighton.
Poller, John C, Newton.
Potter, Joseph S., West Cam-
bridge.
Potter, William, West Cam-
bridge. —
Powers, Charles J., South Fram-
ingham.
Powers, Daniel, Boston.
Prang, Louis, Boston.
Pratt, John C, Boston.
Pratt, L. G , Wesl Newton.
Pratt, Robert M., Boston.
Pratt, Samuel, Chelsea.
Pratt, William, Winchester
Pratt, William, jun., Boston.
Pray, Dr. Mark W., Maiden.
I' I KJOtt, Charles H., Connval-
lis, X S.
Prescott, Eben C, Boston.
Prescott, William G., Quincy.
1871
1,-.!
1859
1X10
1867
L868,
1866.
1865.
IS}.'.
1868.
1864.
1872.
1854.
1819.
1829.
1830.
1831.
1854.
1829.
1849.
1 S.V.I.
1847.
1851.
1860.
1841.
1858,
1865,
1865.
1862.
1851.
1874.
1851.
1871.
1868.
1869.
1ST,.-,.
1865.
1830.
1858.
1866.
1864. Prescott, W. G., Boston.
1865. Preston, George n., Boston.
1832. Preston, John, Boston.
1846. Preston, John, Dorchester.
1864. Preston, Jonathan, Boston.
1830. Priest, John F., Boston.
1854. Prince, F. O., Winchester.
1S55. Prince, W. G., Boston.
1875. Pringle, Cyrus G., Charlotte,
Vt.
Proctor, Thomas P., West Rox-
bury.
Prouty, Gardner, Littleton.
Prouty, Lorenzo, Boston.
Puffer, David, West Cam-
bridge.
Putnam, Benjamin W., Jamaica
Plain.
Putnam, Charles A., Salem.
Putnam, Ebenezer, Salem.
Putnam, Francis, Salem.
Putnam, Henry W., Salem.
Putnam, Joshua II.. Brookline.
. Quant, John, Brighton.
. Quant, William, Brookline.
. Quincy, Josiah, Boston.
. Ramsay, A. II., Cambridge.
Rand, Miss E. L., Newton High-
lands.
Rand, Edward S., Newburyport.
Rand, Edward S., Dedham.
Rand, Edward S., jun., Dedham.
Rand, George C, Newton Cen-
tre.
Rand, Isaac P., Boston.
Baud, Oliver J., Cambridgeport.
Randall, George, New Bedford.
Randall, Macey, Sharon.
Ranlett, Charles A., Billerica.
Ranlett, S. A., Melrose.
Rawson, George P., Feltonville.
Rawson, Warren, West Cam-
bridge.
Rawson, W. W., Arlington.
Ray, Edwin, Roxbury.
Rayner, John J., Lexington.
Reed, Charles M., Dorchester.
Reed, Edwin V. R., Milton.
Reed, George, Roxbury.
Reed, George W., Charlestown.
Reynoso, Bernard de, South
Boston.
1873
1864
1834
1863,
1869,
1863.
18.33.
1868.
1876.
1866.
1S47.
1843.
1831.
1865.
187.3.
18.30.
1S4S.
1855.
1S67.
1855.
1S65.
1845.
1871.
1867.
1869.
1863.
1865.
1S73.
1866.
1865.
1846.
1868.
1831.
1851.
1849.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
519
1865. Rice, Charles, Newton Lower
Falls.
1858. Rice, George W., Roxbury.
1829. Rice, Henry, Boston.
1829. Rice, John P., Boston.
1849. Rice, Thomas, jun., Newton
Lower Falls.
1829. Richards, Edward M., Dedham.
1864. Richards, Francis, Boston.
1876. Richards, John J., Boston.
1868. Richards, John S., Brookline.
1846. Richards, Joseph, Braintree.
1847. Richards, R. A., Dedham.
1845. Richards, William B., Dedham.
1865. Richardson, C. E., Boston.
1871. Richardson, E. P., Lawrence.
1864. Richardson, George C., Cam-
bridge.
1861. Richardson, Horace, Framing-
ham.
1845. Richardson, Joseph, Boston.
1865. Richardson, Joseph, Boston.
1844. Richardson, Josiah, Cambridge.
1829. Richardson, Nathan, M. D.,
South Reading.
1849. Richardson, William H., Dor-
chester.
1869. Richardson, William H., Mai-
den.
1878. Ridler, Charles E., Kingston.
1865. Rinn, J. B., Dedham.
1860. Rivers, George R., Roxbury.
1841. Robbins, Charles, South Boston.
1846. Robbins, Henry, Boston.
1873. Robbins, I. Gilbert, Boston.
1867. Robbins, Nathan, Arlington.
1829. Robbins, Dr. P. G., Roxbury.
1859. Roberts, Edward, Roxbury.
1867. Roberts, S. R., Medford.
1873. Robeson, W. R., Boston.
1843. Robinson, John, Roxbury.
1871. Robinson, Jolm, Salem.
1848. Robinson, John H., Dorchester
1860. Robinson, S , Brookline.
1829. Rodman, Benjamin, New Bed
ford.
1866. Rogers, James E., Chelsea.
1865. Rogers, John F., Cambridge.
1865. Rogers, John H., Boston.
1845. Rogers, O. T , Quiucy.
1832. Rogerson, Robert, Boston.
1829. Rollins, Ebenezer, Boston.
1804. Ross, Henry, Newton.
1863. Ross, M. Denman, Boston.
1871. Ross, Waldo O., Boston.
1829. Rotch, Francis, New Bedford.
1829. Rotch, William, New Bedford.
1866. Ruggles, John, Brighton.
1834. Ruggles, Micah H., Fall River.
1871. Runey, Miss EllaF., Somerville.
1861. Runey, John, Somerville.
1805. Russell, C. D., Boston.
1832. Russell, George, M.D., Lincoln.
1864. Russell, George, Boston.
1875. Russell, George, West Somer-
ville.
1844. Russell, George R., West Rox-
bury.
1860. Russell, John Lewis, Salem.
1831. Russell, Joseph, Boston.
1805. Russell, Joseph M., Maiden.
1876. Russell, N. P., Boston.
1862. Russell, Walter, West Cam-
bridge.
1857. Ryder, William H., Roxbury.
1830. Saltonstall, Leverett, Salem.
1805. Saltonstall, Leverett, Boston.
1847. Sampson, Ezra W., Dedham.
1857. Sampson, George R., Brookline.
1865. Sanborn, Amos C, Cambridge-
port.
1855. Sanborn, John, Charlestown.
1804. Sands, Edward, Boston.
1800. Sanl'ord, H. G., Gloucester.
1853. Sanford, O. S., Cordaville.
1870. Sargent, Charles S., Brookline.
1859. Sargent, Epes, Roxbury.
1805. Sargent, Henry Winthrop, Bos-
ton.
1844. Sargent, Dr. Howard, Dorches-
ter.
1857. Sargent, Ignatius, Brookline.
1805. Sargent, Turner, Boston.
1805. Sargent, Wingate P., Melrose.
1875. Saunders, Miss Mary T., Salem.
1804. Sawtell, J. W., Fitchburg.
1860. Savage, John, jun., Somerville.
1846. Savage, William, Boston.
1867. Saville, George, Quincy.
1865. Saville, Richard L., Brookline.
1807. Sawyer, E. H., Eastliampton.
1865. Sawyer, John W., Grantville.
1835. Sawyer, Matthias P, Boston.
1859. Sawyer, Nathaniel C, Boston.
520 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1854. Sawyer, T. T., Charlestown
1847. Bayers, Edward, Boston.
1849. Schimming, Heinrich, Water-
town.
1855. Bchlegel, Adam, Boston.
1848. Schouler, John, West Cam-
bridge.
1871. Bcott, A. i:., Lexington.
1864. Scott, Charles, Newton.
1867. Scott, George H., Brighton.
. J. C, Brighton.
1864. Scribner, S. S., Maiden.
Scudder, C. W., Brookline.
1845. Scudder, .Marshall S., Boston.
1877. Scudder, Samuel II., Cambridge.
1840. Seabury, Pardon O., New Bed-
ford.
1845. Seaver, Benjamin, Boston.
1805. Seaver, Chandler, Jan., Need-
ham.
1804. Seaver, Nathaniel, East Boston.
1829. Seaver, Nathaniel, jun., Rox-
bury.
1805. Seaver, Robert, Jamaica Plain.
1846. Seaver, William, Koxbury.
1844. Sever, J. W., Boston.
1829. Sharp, Edward, Dorchester.
1874. Shattuck, Frederick R., Boston.
1874. Shaughnessy, John J., Boston.
1845. Shaw, Charles B., Dedham.
1859. Shaw, Christopher C, Boston.
1837. Shaw, Francis 6., Boston.
1830. Shaw, Lemuel, Boston.
1846. Shaw, Robert G., Boston.
1806. Shaw, S. P., Cambridge.
1831. Sbeafe, Henry, Boston.
1805. Sbeafe, William, Brookline..
1867. Shedd, Abraham B., Brookline.
1872. Shedd, Arthur B., Brookline.
1846. Sheehan, Jeremiah, Salem.
1865. Sheldon, Oliver S., Milton.
1873. Shepard, Charles W., West
Newton.
Sheppard, Edwin, Lowell.
1870. Sherman, Japhet, Medford.
1861. Shimmin, Charles F., Boston.
IS)!.".. Bhorey, John L., Lynn.
1829. Shurtleff, Benjamin, Boston.
1830. Shurtleff, Samuel A., M.D., Bos-
ton.
1869. Shute, William M., Boston.
1845. Sigourney, Ilenry, Boston.
1 19. Simmons, David A., Roxbury.
1S45. Simpson, Michael II., Boston.
1845. Simpson, Dr. Paul, Boston.
1847. Sinclair, Thomas, Brighton.
1830. Sisson, Freeborn, Warren, R.I.
1832. Skinner, Francis, Boston.
1804. Skinner, Francis, Boston.
1834. Skinner, .John, Charlestown.
is?:;. Slack, Charles W., Boston.
1865. Slack, Lewis, Brookline.
1844. Sleeper, John S., Boston.
L848. Smalley, David S., Jamaica
Plain.
Smallwood, Thomas, Newton.
Smith, Amos, Cambridgeport.
Smith, Benjamin G, Cam-
bridge.
. Smith, Charles A., Boston.
. Smith, Charles H., Jamaica
Plain.
. Smith, Chauncey, Cambridge.
Smith, Edmund, Brighton.
Smith, E. N., Boston.
Smith, George O., Boston.
Smith, James H., Newton Cor-
ner.
Smith, James M., Boston.
Smith, .lames M.. Boston.
Smith, Joshua B., Cambridge-
port.
Smith, Melancthon. Boston.
Smith, Peter, Andover.
Smith, Stephen H., Providence,
R.I.
Smith, Thomas H., Boston.
Smith, W. B., Boston.
Snow, Eben, Cambridge.
Snow, Eugene A., Melrose.
Southack, George, Roxbury.
Southmayd, John K., Boston.
Southworth, Edward, Quincy.
Sowle, John, Boston.
Sowle, John P., Maiden.
Sparbawk, Edward C, Brigh-
ton.
Sparhawk, Edward C, Brigh-
ton.
Sparhawk, George, Weston.
Spaulding, Edward, Jamaica
Plain.
Spaulding. Mahlon D., Boston.
Speare, Alden, Boston.
1841
1859
180!)
1855
1805
1874,
1S4G.
1872.
1805.
18G4.
1830.
1800.
1872.
1841.
1865.
1829.
1866.
1870.
1870.
1874.
1852.
L863.
1873.
1804.
1804.
1833.
1858.
1871.
1864.
1876.
1808.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
521
1865. Spencer, A. W., Dorchester.
1848. Spencer, William, Lowell.
1863. Spindler, Bernard, Jamaica
Plain.
1838. Spofford, George, Georgetown.
1855. Spooner, William H., West
Roxbury.
1859. Sprague, Charles J., Boston.
1847. Spring, Charles, Brighton.
1864. Springall, George, Maiden.
1829. Springer, John, Sterling.
1863. Squires, John P., West Cam-
bridge.
1865. Stanley, J. H., Chelsea.
1865. Stanwood, E. H., Grantville.
1849. Stanwood, H. B., Boston.
1865. Starbird, Lewis D., Maiden.
1829. Stearns, Charles, Springfield.
1864. Stearns, Charles, Brookline.
1859. Stearns, George L., Medford.
1S66. Stearns, Richard PL, Boston.
1834. Stearns, William, Boston.
1839. Stearns, William G., Cam-
bridge.
1831. Stedman, Josiah, Newton.
1864. Stephenson, John H., Boston.
1849. Stetson, Amos W., Bridgewater.
1852. Stetson, James A., M.D.,Quincy.
1833. Stetson, Joseph, Waltham.
1846. Stetson, Nahum, Bridgewater.
1852. Stetson, Stebbins, Soinerville.
1868. Stevens, E. C, Cambridge.
1848. Stevens, Paran, Boston.
1878. Stevenson, Hamilton, Woburn.
1839. Stickney, Josiah, Boston.
1859. Stickney, Rufus B., Somerville.
1855. Stimpson, George, Charlestown.
1855. Stimpson, H. H.', Cambridge.
1865. Stimpson, William B., Boston 1 .
1876. Stone, Amos, Everett.
1855. Stone, Eliphalet, Dedham.
1849. Stone, George F., Newton.
1831. Stone, Isaac, South Boston.
1860. Stone, James W., Dorchester.
1829. Stone, Leonard, Watertown.
1875. Stone, Milton J., Brookline.
1860. Stone, Phineas J., Charlestown.
1857. Stone, P. R. L., Cambridge.
1875. Stone, Samuel G., Charlestown.
1830. Stone, William, South Boston.
18i9. Storer, D. Humphreys, M.D.,
Boston.
1858. Storer, Frank H., Boston
1830. Storrs, Nathaniel, Boston.
1846. Story, E. Augustus, Brighton.
1835. Story, Hon. Joseph, Cambridge.
1864. Story, Miss Sarah W., Brighton.
1829. Strong, Joseph, juu., South
Hadley.
1848. Strong, William C, Brighton.
1871. Sturgis, John H, Boston.
1866. Sturgis, Russell, jun , Boston.
1842. Sturgis, William, Boston.
1871. Sturtevant,E. Lewis, M.D, South
Framingbaiu.
1848. Sturtevant, Noah, Boston.
1873. Sullivan, Julius L. D., Somer-
ville.
1866. Sumner, Edward, Dedham.
1853. Sumner, William R , Dedham.
1869. Surette, Louis A., Concord.
1854. Swain, Charles D., Roxbury.
1876. Swan, Charles W., Boston.
1829. Swan, Dr. Daniel, Medford.
1S66. Swau, J. Edwin, Dorchester.
1857. Swan, William, Dorchester.
1835. Sweetser, Samuel, Cambridge-
port.
1830. Swift, Henry, Nantucket.
1859. Taft, John B., Boston.
1841. Taft, Orra A., Boston.
1869. Tailby, Joseph, Wellesley.
1873. Tainter, Alonzo E., Medford.
1868. Talbot, Josiah W., South Ded-
ham.
1873. Talbot, William H., Boston.
1841. Tappau, John G., Boston.
1874. Tapper, Thomas, Canton.
1830. Taylor, Charles, Dorchester.
1860. Taylor, Horace B., Boston.
1873. Taylor, Moses, Acton.
1865. Taylor, S. P., Boston.
1835. Teschemacher, James E., Bos-
ton.
1860. Thacher, A. C, Dorchester.
1856. Thacher, Thomas, jun., Rox-
bury.
1874. Thatcher, L. P., Middleborough.
1847. Thaxter, A. W., jun., Boston.
1837. Thaxter, Levi, Watertown.
1846. Thayer, Gideon F., Boston.
1867. Thayer, Henry, North Cam-
bridge.
1847. Thayer, J. Eliot, Boston.
522 -MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1865. Thayer, Nathaniel, Boston.
1866. Thieler; Francis. Medford.
1829. Thomas, Benjamin, Hingham.
1847. Thomas, John M.. New Orleans
1864. Tli. unas, William, Boston.
1829; Thompson, George, Medford.
1864. Thompson, G. M., Waltham.
1807. Thompson, S. Benton, Lexing
ton.
1858. Thorndike, John n., Boston.
1844. Thresher, Rev. Ebenezer, Box-
bury.
1876. Thurlow, Thomas C, Newbury-
port.
1830. Thwing, Supply C. Roxbury.
1847. Ticknor, William D., Boston.
1840. Ti.1,1, .Marshall, Woburn.
1800. Tileston, Edmund P., Dorches-
ter.
1805. Tileston, Edward G., Brookline.
1800. Tilton, Stephen W., Boston.
1870. Tobey, Miss M. B., Boston.
1800. Todd, Jacob, Dorchester.
1866. Todd, John, Hingham.
1854. Todd, William, Roxbury.
1803. Tolman, Albert, Concord.
1873. Tolman, Benjamin, Concord.
1874. Tolman, Miss Harriet S., Bos-
ton.
1802. Tolman, James, Roxbury.
1855. Tolman, John P., Boston.
1865. Tolman, Lucius A., West Rox-
bury.
1863. Torrey,Augustus,M.D., Beverly.
1864. Torrey, Everett, Charlestown.
1866. Tower, Elisha, Roxbury.
1846. Towle, Lyman, Boston.
1844. Towne, Orr N., Boston.
1868. Towne, William B., Boston.
1808. Train, Gorham, Dorchester.
1855. Trautman, Martin, Boston.
1832. Tremlett, Thomas, Dorchester.
1842. Trull, John F., Boston.
18:30. Trull, John W., Boston.
1872. Tucker, E. G., Boston
1855. Tucker, James, jun., Dorches-
ter.
1841. Tucker, John L , Boston.
L841. Tucker, Nathaniel, Dorchester.
L888. Tudor, Frederic, Boston.
1842. Tufts, Elbridge, Cambridgeport.
1869. Tufts, James \Y., Medford.
1847. Turner, John Morton, Brook-
line.
1854. Turner, Nathaniel W., Newton.
1853. Turner, Roswell W., Newton
Centre.
1858. Turner, Royal W., Randolph.
1841. Tuttle, Hugh M., Boston.
1865. Tuttle, Samuel J., Boston.
1834. Tyler, George W., Charlestown.
I860. Underwood, Guy C, Boston.
1S49. Underwood, William, Boston.
1853. Underwood, William J., Bos-
ton.
1868. Upham, Henry, Brookline.
1845. Upton, E. A., Boston.
1860. Upton, George B., Boston.
1845. Vandine, Henry, Cambridge-
port.
1807. Van Voorhies, H. W., South
Maiden.
1877. Vass, William J., Dorchester.
1831. Vila, James, Boston.
1874. Vinton, Alexander H., D.D.,
Boston.
1873. Vinton, Mrs. C. A., Boston.
1873. Vinton, Miss Mary P., Boston.
1866. Vose, B. C, Hyde Park.
1844. Wade, Thomas, Brookline.
1840. Wainwright, Peter, jun., Rox-
bury.
1860. Wainwright, William L., Brain-
tree.
1870. Wakefield, Cyrns, Wakefield.
1849. Wakefield, E. H., Chelsea.
1832. Walcott, Edward, Pawtucket.
1870. Walcott, Henry P., M.D., Cam-
bridge.
1SGI). Walcott, J. W., Roxbury.
1833. Waldo, Henry S., Boston.
1845. Waldron, Richard R., U. S. N,
Charlestown.
1S55. Wales, Adolphus, Randolph.
1820. Wales, William, Dorchester.
1865. Walker, Charles H., Chelsea.
L845. Walker, Edward C. R., Rox-
bury.
1801. Walker, Joseph T., Roxbury.
820. Walker, Samuel, Roxbury.
848. Walker, Samuel A., Boston.
.867. Walker, William P., Somerville.
845. Walley, Samuel H., jun., Rox-
bury.
LIFE AND ANNUAL MEMBERS.
523
1870. Wall is, Mordecai L., "West Rox-
bury.
\SG2. Wallis, William, Newton Lower
Falls.
1842. "Walsh, George, Charlestown.
1859. Walsh, James, Cambridge.
1874. Walsh, Michael H., Brighton.
1859. Walsh, Thomas, Brighton.
1873. Walt ham, George, Nahant.
1857. Ward, Edward A., Cambridge.
1865. Ward, John, Newton.
1829. Ward, Richard, Roxbury.
1859. Ward, W. S., Newton.
1869. Wardwell, William H., West
Newton.
1865. Ware, Benjamin P., Marblehead.
1854. Ware, P. P. P., Boston.
1851. W T arren, A. C, Boston.
1848. Warren, George W., Boston.
1865. Warren, Herbert M., West
Newton. •
1860. Warren, Ira, Boston.
1835. Warren, James L. L. F., Brigh-
ton.
1865. Warren, James M., West New-
ton.
1852. Warren, John C, Boston.
1829. Warren, Jonas, Stow.
1830. Warren, Jonathan, jun., Wes-
ton.
1855. W r arren, Samuel D., Waltham.
1865. Warren, Washington, Chelsea.
1860. Washburn, Alexander C, Bos-
ton.
1857. Washburn, Allen J., Dorches-
ter.
1865. Washburn, E. Fred, Quincy.
1864. Washburn, G. W. C, Roxbury.
1847. Washburn, John, Plymouth.
1864. Washburn, Nehemiah, Brook-
line.
1859. Wason, Elbridge, Brookline.
1865. W T aters, Edwin F., Newton.
1870. Waters, Dr. George F., Newtoi*.
1849. Watson, B. M., Plymouth.
1865. Watson, David, Maiden.
1869. Watts, Isaac, Belmont.
1865. Weatherbee, Comfort, Dedham.
1848. Webb, C. H.. Chelsea.
1848. Webber, Aaron D., Boston.
1829. Webster, Hon. Daniel, Boston.
1869. Webster, John, Salem.
1841. Webster, Joshua, Lynn.
1864. Webster, J. R., M.D., Milton.
1829. Webster, Nathan, Haverhill.
1862. Weightmau, W. S., Boston.
1829. Weld, Aaron D., jun., Boston.
1829. Weld, Benjamin, Roxbury.
1863. Weld, Franklin, West Roxbury.
1863. Weld, Moses W., M.D., Boston.
1858. Weld, Richard H, Roxbury.
1847. Weld, Stephen II., Roxbury.
1849. W T eld, William F., Boston.
1865. Weld, William G , Brookline.
1845. Wellington, Andrew, East Lex-
ington.
1871. Wellington, C. A., East Lexing-
ton.
1864. Wellington, Henry M., West
Roxbury.
1862. Wellington, Mrs. Henry W.,
Roxbury.
1864. Wellington, Joseph O., Bel-
mont.
1856. Wellington, Joseph V.. Cam-
bridge.
1861. Wells, Benjamin T., Boston.
1847. Welsh, John H, Dorchester.
1842. Wentworth, James, Boston.
1865. West, C. W., Maiden.
1829. West, Thomas, Haverhill.
1863. Westgate, Jonathan E., Somer-
ville.
1864. Westgate, Miss Sarah C, Mai-
den.
1834. Weston, Ezra, jun., Boston.
1876. W T eston, Mrs. L. P., Danvers.
1876. Weston, Leonard W., Lincoln.
1870. Weston, Seth, North Chelsea.
1863. Wetherell, C. W., Maiden.
1860. Wetherell, John G., Dorchester.
1860. Wetherell, Leander, Boston.
1871. Wheatland, Henry., MD., Salem.
1844. Wheeler, A. B., Boston.
1807. Wheeler, Miss Ann C, Cam-
bridgeport.
1863. Wheeler, Lewis, Cambridge-
port.
1864. Wheeler, Samuel L., Newton
Centre.
1864. Wheelwright, A. C, Boston.
1834. Wheelwright, J. F., Brighton.
1831. Wheelwright, Lot, jun., Bos-
ton.
524
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1831. Wheelwright, William W., Bos-
ton.
1S55. Wheildon, William W., Con-
cord.
1864. Whipple, John A., Boston.
1841. Whitakcr, Edgar K., EastNeed-
liam.
1 1849. Whitcomb, Levi, Boston.
1865. Whitcomb, William B., Med-
ford.
1846. White, B. C, Boston.
1865. White, Edward A., Boston.
1851. White, George E., Boston.
1845. White, Ferdinand E., Boston.
1865, White, Francis A., Brookline.
1842. White, John P., Brookline.
1857. White, Nathan II., Quincy.
1853. White, Nathaniel, Brookline.
1864. White, Nelson B., South Ded-
ham.
1874. White, T. C, Charlestown.
1868. Whiteley, Edward, Cambridge.
1870. Whitman, Dr. E. F., North Chel-
sea.
1830. Whitmarsh, Samuel, Northamp-
ton.
1858. Whitmore, Charles O., Boston.
1829. Whiting, Calvin, Boston.
1845. Whiting, Nathaniel, Medford.
1837. Whitney, Benjamin D., Cam-
bridge.
1847. Whitney, Eli M., Boston.
1855. Whitney, Joel, Winchester.
1866. Whitney, Luther F., Charles-
town.
1860. Whitney, William, Dedham.
1845. Whitney, William F-., Boston.
1865. Whiton, Bela, Hingham.
1803. Whittemore, J. P., West Cam-
bridge.
1865. Whittle, George W., Somerville.
1855. Whytal, Thomas G., WestRox-
bury.
1859. Wiggin, John K., Boston.
1863. Wilbur. (I. 1!., Waterlown.
1877. Wilde, Hiram, Randolph.
1865. Wilder, Charles J., Grantville.
1866. Wilder, Henry A., South Bos-
ton.
1830. Wilder, Marshall P., Boston.
1829. Wilder, B. V. S., Bolton.
1873. Wilkins, C. W., Boston.
1845. Wilkins John II., Boston.
1829. Wilkinson, Simon, Boston.
1S40. Willard, Aaron, jun., Boston.
1829. Willard, Joseph, Lancaster.
1867. Willeox, Rev. William H., Read-
ing.
1835. Willcutt, Levi L., West Rox-
lmry.
1845. Williams, Aaron D., jun., Rox-
bnry.
1865. Williams, B. B., Boston.
1SG5. Williams, Dudley, Jamaica
Plain.
1865. Williams, Elijah, Boston.
1869. Williams, II. W., M.D., Boston.
1833. Williams, John, Cambridgeport.
18G0. Williams, John, Fairmount.
18G6. Williams, John E., Jamaica
Plain.
1857. Williams, J. O., Jamaica Plain.
1829. Williams, Moses, Boston.
1871. Williams, Philander, Taunton.
1853. Williams, Stephen, Roxbury.
1868. Willis, George W., Chelsea.
1871. Willis, J. C, Boston.
1832. Willott, Thomas, Charlestown.
1873. Wilmarth, H. D., Jamaica Plain.
1863. Wilson, B Osgood, Watertown.
1805. Wilson, Elisha T., Boston.
1847. Wilson, George, Marblehead.
1852. Wilson, George W., Maiden.
1871. Wilson, Henry W., South Bos-
ton.
1831. Wilson, John, Roxbury.
1833. Wilson, Robert, Boston.
1848. Wilson, W. S.. Boston.
1835. Winchester, William P., Boston.
184S. Winship, Francis Lyman,
Brighton.
1856. Winship, Franklin, Brighton.
1864. Winship, Herman, Brighton.
1864. Winship. Oliver M., Lexington.
1855. Winslow, Reuben, Roxbury.
1870. Wiswall, Artemas, Newton.
1866. Wiswall, Henry M., Watertown.
1872. Woerd, Charles V., Waltham.
1873. Woerd, Charles V., jun., Wal-
tham.
1876. Wolcott, Mrs. Henrietta L. T.,
Boston.
1870. Wood, Mrs. Anna D., West
Newton.
HONORARY MEMBERS.
525
1869. Wood, Miss Calista S., West
Newton.
1849. Wood, Dr. E., Dighton.
1801. Wood, Edmund M., West Need-
ham.
1868. Wood, Elijah W., West Newton.
1873. Wood, R. W., Jamaica Plain.
1870. Wood, William K., West New-
ton.
1873. Woodbury, Charles, M.D., Bev-
erly.
1S65. Woodford, Joseph H., Newton.
1864. Woodman, G. F., West Rox-
bury.
1871. Woods, Luke H., Marlborough.
1865. Woodward, Royal, Brookline.
1846. Worcester, Joseph E., Cam-
bridge.
1867. Wright, George C, West Acton.
1866. Wrisley, Frank, Boston.
1829. Wyatt, Robert, Boston.
1846. Wyeth, Jonas, 2d, Cambridge.
1829. Wyeth, Nathaniel J., Cam-
bridge.
1854. Wyman, Luke, West Cam-
bridge.
1841. Wyman, O. C, Boston.
1850. Yendell, George, Dorchester.
1849. Young, Calvin, Jamaica Plain.
1871. Young, Thomas, jun., Somer-
ville.
1852. Young, William, Fall River.
1846. Young, Willwood, New Bed-
ford.
1862. Zirngiebel, Denys, Cambridge.
HONORARY MEMBERS.
1829. Benjamin Abbott, LL.D., Exeter, N.H.
1829. John Abbott, Brunswick, Me.
1S29. Hon. John Quincy Adams, LL.D., Ex-President of the United States,
Quincy.
1848. Professor Louis Agassiz, Cambridge.
1829. William T. Aiton, Curator of the Royal Gardens, Kew, Eng.
1848. Thomas Allen, President of the St. Louis Horticultural Society, St.
Louis, Mo.
1845. Hon. Samuel Appleton, Boston.
1839. Hon. James Arnold, New Bedford.
1S29. Edward Nathaniel Bancroft, M.D., President of the Horticultural and
Agricultural Society of Jamaica.
1830. Hon. Philip P. Barbour, Virginia.
1836. Don Angel Calderon de la Barca, Spanish Minister at Washington.
1829. Robert Barclay, Bury Hill, Dorking, Surrey, Eng.
1830. James Beekman, New York.
1838. L'Abbe' Berlese, Paris.
1839. Nicholas Biddle, Philadelphia.
1859. Jacob Bigelow, M.D., Boston.
1840. Mrs. Lucy Bigelow, Medford.
1829. Le Chevalier Soulange Bodin, Secretary of the Horticultural Society of
Paris.
1851. Hon. George S. Boutwell, Groton.
1847. Josiah Bradlee, Boston.
1851. Hon. George N. Briggs, Pittsfield.
1858. Hon. James Buchanan, President of the United States.
526 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1820. Jesse Buel, President of the Albany Horticultural Society.
1848. Hon. Edmund Burke, Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D.C.
1829. Augustin Pyramus .' >.. Roxbury.
1848. Col. Joel Rathbone, President of the Albany and Rensselaer Horti-
cultural Society, Albany.
1829. Archibald John, Earl of Roseberry, President of the Caledonian Horti-
cultural So< iety.
1829. Joseph Sabine, Secretary of the Horticultural Society of London.
1832. Don Ramon l-. lion. Robert C. Winthrop, Boston.
Frederick Wolcott, Litchfield, Conn.
1829. Ashton Yates, Liverpool.
1848. Lawrence Young, President of the Kentucky Horticultural Society,
Louisville.
CORRESPONDING MEMBERS. 529
CORRESPONDING MEMBERS.
1829. John Adlum, Georgetown, D.C.
1830. Moris. Alfroy, Lieusaint, France.
1875. James T. Allan, President of the Nebraska State Horticultural Society,
Omaha, Neb.
1847. A. B. Allen, Editor of the American Agriculturist, New York.
1857. Rev. Thomas D. Anderson, Roxbury.
1831. Don Francisco Aguilar, United States Vice Consul, Maldonado, Banda
Oriental del Uruguay.
1829. Thomas Appleton, United States Consul, Leghorn, Italy.
1829. Col. Thomas Aspinwall, United States Consul, London.
1875. P. M. Augur, State Pomologist, Middlefield, Conn.
1829. Isaac Cox Barnet, United States Consul, Paris.
1869. Patrick Barry, Chairman of the General Fruit Committee of the Ameri-
can Pomological Society, Rochester, N.Y.
1841. Augustin Baumann, Bolwiller, France.
1841 Eugene Achille Baumann, Bolwiller, France.
1841. Joseph Bernard Baumann, Bolwiller, France.
1841. Napoleon Baumann, Bolwiller, France.
1875. D. W. Beadle, St. Catherine's, C.W.
1875. Professor W. J. Beal, Lansing, Mich.
1840. Noel J. Becar, Brooklyn, N.Y.
1847. Edward Beck, Worton College, Isleworth, near London.
1847. Rev. Henry Ward Beecher, Editor of the Western Farmer and Gardener,
Indianapolis, Ind.
1854. Louis Edouard Berckmans, Plainfield, N.J.
1869. Prosper J. Berckmans, Augusta, Ga.
1869. Alexandre Bivort, Secretary of the Societe' Van Mons, Fleurus, Belgium.
1841. Mons. Tripet Le Blanc, Paris.
1869. Charles D. Bragdon, Pulaski, Oswego County, N.Y.
1847. William D. Brinckle, M.D., Philadelphia.
1843. George Brown, United States Commissioner, Sandwich Islands.
1836. John W. Brown, Fort Gaines, Ga.
1834. Dr. Nehemiah Brush, East Florida.
1875. Arthur Bryant, sen., Ex-President of the Illinois State Horticultural
Society, Princeton, 111.
1847. Robert Buist, Philadelphia.
1830. Dr. E. W. Bull, Hartford, Conn.
1878. William Bull, Chelsea, Eng.
1875. Rev. Robert Burnet, President of the Ontario Fruit Growers' Associa-
tion, Hamilton, C.W.
1829. Alexander Burton, United States Consul, Cadiz.
1878. Isidor Bush, Bushberg, Jefferson County, Mo.
1875. George W. Campbell, Delaware, O.
1829. Francis G. Carnes, Paris.
1829. Col. Robert Carr, Philadelphia.
1842. Rev. John O. Choules, Schenectady, N.Y.
1847. Rev. Henry Colman, Boston.
1830. James Colvill, Chelsea, Eng.
1860. Benjamin E. Cotting, M.D., Boston.
530 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
1839. Samuel L. Dana, M.D., Lowell.
1869. J. Decaisne, Professeur de Culture au Museum d'Histoixe Naturelle,
Janlin des Plantes, Paris.
1829. James Deering, Portland, Me.
1834. II. F. Dickehut.
1857. C. Wentworth Dilke, London.
1851. Bon. Allen W. Dodge, Hamilton, Mass.
1875. Rev. n. nonywood D'Ombrain, Westwell Vicarage, Asliford, Kent,
Eng.
1844. Andrew Jackson Downing, Newburg, N.Y.
1869. Charles Downing, Newburg, N.Y.
1875. Parker Earle, South Pass, 111.
1869. F. R. Elliott, Secretary of the American Pomological Society, Cleve-
land, O.
1875. George Ellwanger, Rochester, NY.
1847. George B. Emerson, Boston.
1833. Ebenezer Emmons, M.D., Williamstown.
1S41. Andrew H. Ernst, Cincinnati.
1833. Nathaniel Fellows, Cuba.
1834. Henry J. Finn, Newport, R.I.
1869. Willard C. Flagg, President of the Illinois Horticultural Society, Alton.
1830. .Michael Floy, Vice-President of the New York Horticultural Society,
New York.
1830. John Fox, Washington, D.C.
1838. Hon. Russell Freeman, Sandwich.
1869. Andrew S. Puller, Ridgewood, N.J.
1857. Henry "Weld Fuller, Roxbury.
1875. Hon. R. W. Furnas, Ex-President of the Nebraska State Horticultural
Society, Brownville, Neb.
1S54. Augustin Gande, President of the Horticultural Society of the Depart-
ment of Sarthe, France.
1829. Robert H. Gardiner, Gardiner, Me.
1829. Benjamin Gardner, United States Consul, Palermo, Sicily.
1847. Capt. James T. Gerry, United States Navy.
1829. Abraham P. Gibson, United States Consul, St. Petersburg.
1847. Robert Glendinning, Chiswick, near London.
1S77. Professor George L. Goodale, Cambridge.
1.S47. Professor Asa < rray, Cambridge.
1875. 0. B. Hadwen, Ex-President of the Worcester County Horticultural
Society, Worcester.
Iharles Henry Hall, New York.
1829. Abraham Halsey, New York.
1875. Dr. Charles C. Hamilton, Ex-President of the Fruit Growers' Associa-
tion and International Show Society of Nova Scotia, Cornwallis.
1831. Rev. Thaddeus Mason Harris, D.D., Dorchester.
1841. Tbaddens William Harris, M. I)., Cambridge.
1829. John Hay, Architect of the Caledonian Horticultural Society.
1830. Bernard Henry, United States Consul, Gibraltar.
1875. Shirley Hibberd, Editor of the Gardener's Magazine, London.
.1. J. Hitchcock, Baltimore, M.l.
Robert Hogg, I.L.D., Editor of the Journal of Horticulture, London.
Thomas Hogg, New York.
CORRESPONDING MEMBERS. 531
1875. Thomas Hogg, New York.
1869. J. C. Holding, Treasurer and Secretary of the Cape of Good Hope Agri-
cultural Society, Cape Town, Africa.
1875. Rev. S. Reynolds Hole, Caunton Manor, Newark, Nottinghamshire,
Eng.
1875. Fisher Holmes, Sheffield, Eng.
1876. Dr. Joseph D. Hooker, Director of the Royal Botanic Garden, Kew,
Eng.
1875. Josiah Hoopes, "West Chester, Penn.
1847. Professor E. N. Horsford, Cambridge.
1859. Sanf ord Howard , Chicago, 111.
1875. Dr. William M. Howsley, President of the Kansas State Horticultural
Society, Leavenworth.
1830. Isaac Hunter, Baltimore, Md.
1841. Isaac Hurd, Cincinnati, O.
1869. George Husmann, Hermann, Mo.
1842. Professor Isaac W. Jackson, Union College, Schenectady, N.Y.
1869. Thomas P. James, Philadelphia.
1841. Edward Jarvis, M.D., Louisville, Ky.
1854. J. W. P. Jenks, Middleborough.
1836. "William J. Johnson, M.D., Fort Gaines, Ga.
1857. Samuel Kneeland, jun., M.D., Boston.
1847. Mons. Laffay, Bellevue, near Paris, France.
1829. David Landreth, jun., Corresponding Secretary of the Pennsylvania
Horticultural Society, Philadelphia.
1875. C. C. Langdon, Mobile, Ala.
1875. Dr. William LeBaron, State Entomologist, Geneva, 111.
1875. G. F. B. Leighton, President of the Norfolk Horticultural and Pomological
Society, Norfolk, Va.
1831. E. S. H. Leonard, M.D., Providence.
1852. Andre Leroy, Angers, France.
1876. J. Linden, Ghent, Belgium.
1847. Hon. George Lunt, Newburyport.
1849. F. "W. Macondray, San Francisco, Cal.
1851. James J. Mapes, LL.D. Newark, N.J.
1869. A. Mas, President of the Horticultural Society, Bourg-en-Bresse, France.
1869. Dr. Maxwell T. Masters, Editor of the Gardener's Chronicle, London.
1829. James Maury, United States Consul, Liverpool, Eng.
1875. T. C. Maxwell, Geneva, N.Y.
1833. "William Sharp McLeay, New York.
1876. James McNab, Curator of the Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, Scotland.
1869. Thomas Meehan, Editor of the Gardener's Monthly, Germantown, Penn.
1830. Allan Melvill, New York.
1829. John Miller, M.D., Secretary of the Horticultural and Agricultural
Society of Jamaica.
1829. Stephen Mills, Flushing, N.Y.
1S47. Charles MTntosh, Dalkeith Palace, near Edinburgh, Scotland.
1875. J. E. Mitchell, Philadelphia.
1853. Giuseppe Monarchini, M.D., Canea, Isle of Candia.
1876. Edonard Morren, Editor of the Belgique Horticole, Lie'ge, Belgium.
1829. Horatio Newhall, M.D., Galena, 111.
1829. David W. Ofney, United States Consular Agent, Smyrna, Turkey.
532 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
182fl. James Oinbrosi, Assistant United States Consul, Florence, Italy.
1829. John J. Palmer, New York.
1845. Victor Paquet, Paris.
1S20. John W. Parker, United States Consul, Amsterdam, Holland.
1829. Andre Parmentier, Brooklyn, N.Y.
1875. William Paul, Walt ham Cross, London, X.
1847. Joseph Paxton, Chatsworth, England.
1829. John L. Payson, United States Consul, Messina, Sicily.
1829. Commodore Matthew C. Perry, United States Navy, Charlestown.
1832. David Porter, United States Charge d' Affaires at the Ottoman Porte,
Constantinople.
1S29. Alfred Stratton Prince, Flushing, NY.
1829. William Robert Prince, Flushing, N.Y.
1ST-. P. T. Quinn, Newark, N.J.
1875. Rev. Rushton Radclyffe, London.
1833. William Foster Redding, Baltimore, Md.
1875. D. Redmond, Pass Christian, Miss.
1832. Dr. S. Reynolds, Schenectady, N.Y.
1833. Dr. John H. Richards, Illinois.
1875. Charles V. Riley, State Entomologist, St. Louis, Mo.
1878. J. Rinz, jun., Frankfort-on-the-Main, Germany.
1847. Thomas Rivers, Sawhridgeworth, nerts, Eng.
1875. William Robinson, Editor of The Garden, London.
1829. Dr. J. Smyth Rogers, Hartford, Conn.
1830. William S. Rogers, United States Navy.
18G0. Bernard Rosier, M.D., Athens, Greece.
1833. Thomas Rotch, Philadelphia.
1834. George R. Rnssell, Manilla, Luzon.
1847. John 15. Russell, Cincinnati, O.
1S40. Rev. John Lewis Russell, Chelmsford.
1875. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
1831. William Shaler, United States Consul-General, Havana, Cuba.
1831. William Shaw, New York.
1829. Caleb R. Smith, Burlington N..T.
1S29. Daniel I). Smith, Burlington, N.J.
1831. ( rideon B. Smith, Editor of the American Farmer, Baltimore.
isTT. John Jay Smith, Germautown, Peun.
' I initio Sprague, Gibraltar.
1S75. Robert W. Starr, President of the Fruit Growers' Association and Inter-
national Show Society of Nova Scotia, Cornwallis.
1875. I>r. Joseph Stayman, Leavenworth, Kan.
1831. Capt. Thomas Holdup Stevens, United States Navy, Middletown, Conn.
1832, William Fos Strangeway, British Secretary of Legation at Naples.
: >r. J. Strentzel, Martinez, Cal.
1831. Judge E. B. Strong, Rochester, N.Y.
1834. .lames p. Sturgis, Canton.
1850. William Summer. Pomaria, S.C.
1 3 13 Francis Summerest.
1832. Professor Michele Tenore, Director of the Botanic Garden at Naples.
1839. James Engleben Teschemacher, Boston.
Robert Thompson, Chiswick, near Loudon.
1829. George C. Thorburn, New York.
CORRESPONDING MEMBERS. 533
1869. Professor George Thurber, Editor of the American Agriculturist, New
York.
1833. John Tilson, jun., Edwardsville, 111.
1836. Cav. Doct. Vincent Tinio, Director of the Botanic Garden at Palermo.
1847. Luther Tucker, Editor of The Cultivator, Albany, N.Y.
1839. Carey Tyso, Wallingford, Eng.
1846. Louis Van Houtte, Ghent, Belgium.
1851. Alexandre Vattemare, Paris.
1836. Emilien de "Wael, Secretary of the Horticultural Society, Antwerp,
Belgium.
1869. John A. Warder, M.D., President of the Ohio State Horticultural Society.
1875. Anthony "Waterer, Knapp Hill near "Woking, Surrey, Eng.
1846. J. Ambrose "Wight, Editor of the Prairie Farmer, Chicago, 111.
1875. Benjamin Samuel "Williams, Holloway, London, N.
1853. Professor John "Wilson, Agricultural College, Cirencester, Eng.
1829. "William "Wilson, New York.
1831. Gen. Joshua Win gate, jun., Portland.
1829. Hon. J. F. Wingate, Bath, Me.
1833. Joseph Augustus Winthrop, Charleston, S.C.
Number of Fouuders 16
Number of Original Members 138
Number of Elected Members 2,088
Number of Honorary Members 156
Number of Corresponding Members 199
Total Membership 2,597
INDEX.
Achimenes longiflora, 260, 262, 283.
Acts of incorporation, 63, 475, 476.
Adiantum Farleyense, 381.
Adlum, John, 35.
Aerides odoraturn, 402.
Agave Americana, flowering of, 35, 412.
Americana var., 244.
Alocasia macrorhiza fol. var., 351.
metallica, 328, 354.
Aloe mitrajformis, 260.
Alsophila Australia, 358, 394, 398.
excelsa, 394.
Althaeas, collection of, 231.
Amaryllis, seedling, 419.
Amelanchier Canadensis, 440.
Ampelopsis Veitchii, 409.
Anniversary dinners, 220, 242, 245, 252, 255,
262, 415, 452.
Anniversary, first, 219.
semi-centennial, 449.
Annuals, great variety of, 320.
Antholyza praealta, 215, 226.
Anthurium crystallinum, 412.
regale, 358.
Scherzerianum, 356, 420.
Anticipations of the founders of the Society,
120, 462.
Apple, Baldwin, origin of, 43.
Blackstone's Yellow-Sweeting, 13
Broad well, 258.
Early Sweet Bough, 241.
flowerless, 17, 234.
Garden Royal, 405.
Grimes's Golden Pippin, 357.
Hunt Russet, 3S8.
Hunter's Pippin, 368.
King of Tompkins County, 388.
Lady's Sweet, 261.
Mother, 261.
Newtown Pippin, 25.
Northern Spy, 261.
Quoddling, 14.
Rhode Island Greening, 4.
Apple, Roxbury Russet, 37.
Roxbury Russet, origin of, 43.
Summer Sweet Paradise, 383.
Tetofsky, 383.
Washington Strawberry, 312.
Wormsley Pippin, 368.
Apple tree, in pot, 368.
Peregrine White, 3.
Apple trees, ancient, 14, 15.
ancient, at York, Me., 18.
ancient Hightop Sweet, 3, 4.
at Old Orchard Beach, 18.
Apples, ancient varieties, 4.
bitter rot in, 36.
collections of, 224, 244, 292, 298, 304, 333,
392.
exportation of, in 1773, 26.
fine, 322, 332, 351, 421.
from Kansas, 377.
from Missouri, 405.
from Nebraska, 363.
from Nova Scotia, 405, 414, 431.
introduced in the West, 37.
molasses from, 17.
new in 1830, 224.
new in 1S76, 421.
old varieties at Detroit, 23.
Appleton, Samuel, 88.
Apricot, Moorpark, 223.
Aquilegia chrysantha, 381.
coerulea, 353.
glandulosa, 349.
Aralia Mandshurica, 439.
Araucaria excelsa, 244, 391, 398.
imbricata, 348, 398.
Arundo Donax striata, 273.
Asparagus, large, 370.
Asters, fine displays of, 306, 309.
Aucuba Japonica, 361.
Awards, special, 239, 276, 286, 292, 296, 400.
Azalea, hybrid, 419.
Azalea mollis, 403, 439, 442.
Stella, 417. ^
536
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Azalea, Princess Mary of Cambridge, 381.
i tbibltlon, first) 381.
Azaleas, collection of hardy, 290.
collections of, 'J 15.
fine hardy,
fine plan!-, 419.
Indian, first exhibited, 236.
Back Bay, effort to obtain land on, 164.
Barberry, injury to grain b
Bar tram, John, and his botanic garden, 24.
Bartram, William, travels of, 27.
I'., an, White Wax Podded,
Beans, fine Lima, 432, 1 12.
large collections of, 318, 339.
Beechcr, Rev. II. W., address by, 314.
Beet, Egyptian, 363.
Beets, Improved, 379.
Begonias, bulbous, in:;, 412.
Bigelow, Dr. Jacob, 69, 70, 88.
letter of, 115.
resolutions in recognition of his services,
117.
Bignonia venusta, 297.
Blackberry, Dorchester, 254, 313.
Kittatinny, 376.
Lawton, 313.
Wilson's Early, 363.
Blackberries, large, 320.
Blackstoae, William, garden of, 13.
Books, agricultural, horticultural, and botan-
ical, 52.
Adlum's Cultivation of the Vine, 30.
American Farmer, 47.
Coxe's View of the Cultivation of Fruit
Tree-, 35.
Logan's Gardener's Kalendar, 29.
Massachusetts Agricultural Repository,
33.
M'Mahon's American Gardener's Calen-
dar, 42.
New England Farmer, 47.
Prince's Pomological Manual, 29.
Prince's Treatise on Horticulture, 29.
Prince's Treatise on the Vine, 29.
Squib's Gardener's Kalendar, 29.
Thacber's American Orchardist, 44.
Botanic garden, Cambridge, 4n.
Elgin, to.
Bougainvillea spectabills, 346.
B in its, 1 18, 228, 230, 237,244,264,273,280,
309.
aer, George W., 72, 88.
I !uol, Jesse, new fruits introduced by, 49.
Busts and portraits, 124, 144, 163, 178, 1S2.
Cabbage, Wyman, 379.
Cactus, large, 2S0.
- triangularis, 246.
Caladium argyrites, 328.
Calceolarias, fine, 246, 297, 428.
Calluna vulgaris, 328.
Camellia C. M. ilovey, 305.
Ployli,42.
Mrs. Abby Wilder, 276, 385.
Mrs. Anne Marie Ilovey, 306.
Wilderl, 276.
introduction of, 41.
Camellias, collections of, 245.
seedling, 217, 381.
shows of, 2*
Carnations, a hundred varieties shown, 223.
< larpet gardening, 447.
Cattleya Dowiana, 439.
Moseise, 303, 356.
Trianae I >aisy, 418.
Cauliflower, largo, 227.
Cauliflowers, special prize for, 351.
Cedrus Dcodara, 215.
( !cmetcries, books on, 95, 112.
introduction of rural, 455.
Cemetery, acts to establish a rural, 80, 110,
4S0, 481.
connection of garden with, 76.
long contemplated, 70.
lots, subscribers for first hundred, 80,
47S.
subscription for, 78.
proposed to the Society, 75, 77.
rural, proposed, 69.
Centennial exposition, 425.
Certificates of merit, 335.
Cherries, good crop of, 376.
Cherry, Black Eagle,272.
Black Tartarian, 42.
Coe's Transparent, 297.
Downer, 217, 272.
Ilovey, 302.
May Duke, 43, 54, 329.,
Norfolk, 382, 414.
Ox Heart, 388.
Red Kentish, 4, 54.
White Tartarian, 42.
Cherry trees, ancient, at Bristol, R.I., 20.
ancient, at Fonkers, X.T., 20.
Chrysanthemum show, first, 357.
Chrysanthemums exhibited in 1830,226.
Cider in Massachusetts, S, 16.
Cinerarias, fine, 128.
Cissus discolor, 304, 320, 404.
Clematis azurea ixrandiflora, 254, 290.
Jackmanni, 350.
lanuginosa, 308.
Bieboldii, 240.
Clerodendron Thomeonte, 349, 350, 408.
Clianthus Dampieri, 365.
INDEX.
537
Cocoanut tree, 223.
Cocoa Wedelliana, 404.
Ccelogyne cristata, 412, 438.
Coleus, Chameleon, 382.
multicolor, 439.
Verscbaffeltii, 335.
Committee of Arrangements, 269.
first, 233.
Committee, Building, report of, 166.
Finance, chairmen of, 138.
on Gardens, 2S9.
■work of, 311.
Garden and Cemetery, 79, 80.
reports of, 103, 105.
Library, chairmen of, 203.
reports of, 191, 192, 194, 195, 196, 197,
198, 199, 200, 201.
Committees, first standing, and duties, 65,
477.
reports of, 289, 296, 302, 340.
Compositse, collection of, 429.
Conifers, collections of, 320, 351, 403.
Contracts for building, 170, 173.
Cook, Zebedee, jun.'s article proposing a
horticultural society, 56.
Corn, Triumph, 407.
Council, the, 64.
Coxe, William, pomologist, 35.
Cupressus Lawsoniana, 320, 332.
Curculio, destruction of, 256.
Currant, Dana's Transparent, 382.
Versaillaise, 313, 338, 382.
Currant worm, 367.
Currants, collection of, 1S33, 230.
Cyanopbyllum magnificum, 323, 348, 362.
Cyclamens, fine, 427.
Cypripedium caudatum, 439.
insigne, 319, 412.
Sedeni, 421.
Dahlia show, first grand, 252.
second grand, 256.
third grand, 260.
Dahlias, fine displays of, 220, 232, 235, 237,
253, 2S2, 387, 395, 429,
large collection of, 231.
Liliputian, 317.
Dalecbampia Roezliana, 358.
Dandelions, improved, 378.
Dearborn, President II. A. S., address of, 219.
ardor in establishing the Society, 67.
labors at Mount Auburn, 86, 87, -90.
letter to Mr. Brimmer, 88.
Debt of the Society, 136, 138.
Delegates from other societies, 262, 281.
Dendrobium Wardianuin, 438.
moschatum, 306.
Derby, Ezekiel Hersey, 39.
Designs, floral, 265, 273, 278, 281, 307, 309, 323.
Desire to own a building, 147.
Deutzia crenata flore pleno, 349.
gracilis, 313.
scabra, 251.
Dielytra spectabilis, 47, 297.
Dionsa muscipula, 246, 420.
Dioscorea Batatas, 310.
bulbifera, 27.
Diploma, 66.
Donation of chair from Llewellyn D. Jones,
146.
of clock from John J. Low, 157.
of herbariums from George E. Daven-
port and others, 211.
of paintings from Dr. S. P. Flildreth, 158.
John J. Low, 146.
L. M. Sargent, 163.
of portraits from Samuel Downer, 179.
Benjamin V. French, 180.
Aaron D. Williams, ISO.
others, 180.
of seeds from Baron Ludwig, 215.
Dr. Nathaniel Wallich, 215.
of scions from Dr. J. B. Van Mons, 214.
of statues and busts from Benjamin P.
Cheney, 177.
H. H. Hunnewell, 177.
Amos A. Lawrence, 180.
Massachusetts Agricultural Club, 179.
G. Thorburn & Sons, 144.
C. O. Whitmore, 164, 177, 180.
of trees from William Prince & Sons,
213.
of vases from Josiah Bradlee, 158.
George B. Jones, 158.
Donations and bequests from Hon. Samuel
Appleton, 123, 197.
Edward Beck, 125.
Josiah Bradlee, 124.
Ambrose S. Courtis, 122.
John P. Cushing, 123, 124.
Hon. Benjamin V. French, 125.
William Gray, jun., 129.
H. H. Hunnewell, 126, 127.
Thomas Lee, 122, 248.
John A. Lowell, 124.
Hon. Theodore Lyman, 124.
Charles S. Sargent, 129.
George W. Smith, 125, 197.
Josiah Stickney, 128, 201.
William Thomas, 127.
Dr. William J. Walker, 128.
John Welles, 122.
Levi Whitcomb, 129.
others, 129.
of books from John Fisk Allen, 204.
Cambridge Horticultural Society, 202.
538
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY,
Donations and bequest of books from "Wil-
liam Cray,. ju ii., 204.
Francis L. Lee, 204.
John Lewis Russell, 202.
others, iss, iss, 190.
Dracaena Baptlstil, 418.
Eendersonl, 438.
Dracsanas, Beedllng, 430, 440.
I >udley, Paul, account of fruit trees, etc., in
1726, 15.
Dufour, John James, 37.
Echlum grundiflorum, 237.
Egg plant, Blaok Pekln, 352.
Elms, Paddock, 878.
Endicott, Gov., orchard and nursery, 12.
EnkiantbUB quinqucflorus, 246.
EriantbUB Ravennae, 400.
Erica baccans, 246.
ventricosa superba, 241.
Estate, Montgomery House, purchased, 137,
165.
In School Street purchased, 136, 149.
sold, 137, 102.
Eucharis Amazonica, 328, 354, 412.
Eugenia Malaccensis, 249.
Eolalia Japonica, 440.
Events contemporaneous with the formation
of the Society, 63.
Everett, Alexander II., address of, 108.
Evergreens, collection of, 348.
Exhibition day, change of, 216, 350, 353.
Exhibition, first, 218.
Exhibitions, 1S29-1844, 213.
1845-1864, 271.
1865-1878, 346.
earliest and latest compared, 459.
expense of, 132.
instituted, 66.
instructiveness of, 467.
origin of, 216.
three periods, 213T
Expenditures of the Society, 131, 135.
Experimental garden, 96.
seeds for, 98.
vegetables and (lowers from, 99.
Faneuil, Andrew, garden and hothouse, 18.
Ferns, collections of, 326, 381, 395, 419, 429.
filmy, 413.
and lycopods, 318, 327, 331.
native, 320,381,402,419.
Fertility of the virgin soil, 4.
Fertilizers, experiments with, 262, 276.
Ficus dealbata, 365.
tloa, 220, 286, 252,398.
Finances of the Society, 119.
Fire at rooms in Cornhill, 146.
First meeting to form a horticultural society,
58.
Fish used as a fertilizer, 2, 7.
Flowers, baskets of, 323, 339, 351, 366, 387.
collections of, 268.
exhibited In 1S30, 225.
exhibited in 1848, 286.
hybrid, 277, 282, 350, 352, 360, 362, 364,
374, 44.',.
improvement in, 208, 811, 343, 459, 465.
in Massachusetts, 1663-71,9.
seedling, 218, 247, 268, 306, 311, 344, 362,
365, 3S8, 466.
Floy, Michael, 41.
Forest trees, large, 17.
Formal proposal of a horticultural society,
56.
Formation of other societies, 454.
of the Society well timed, etc., 457.
Founders of the Society, 59, 600.
Fruit, abundant crop of, 329.
in Virginia, 21.
from Angers, France, 295.
from Bremen, 313.
from California, 362, 378.
from Lake Champlain Valley, 295.
from Nova Scotia, 405, 414, 431.
culture and wine making in Maryland,
21.
house, Professor Nyce's, 354.
supply of, 421, 464.
Fruit trees destroyed by frost, 1737, 28.
in Massachusetts, 1663-71, 8.
in 1720, 16, 17.
Fruits at annual exhibition, 1834, 234.
1848, 286.
brought by settlers in Missouri, 36.
and (lowers, August 1, 1S29, 217.
forced, 280, 335, 338.
importation of new- varieties of, 42, 44,
266.
in California, introduction of, 89.
in Illinois, introduction of, 36.
in Indiana, introduction of, 36.
in Kentucky, introduction of, 36.
in Louisiana, introduction of, 38.
in Mississippi, 88.
in Ohio, introduction of, 36.
large collections of, 2S5, 305, 333, 393.
native, in 1795, 26.
paintings of, 142.
new, in 1829, 831.
new native, 267.
nomenclature of, 267.
seedling, 247, 303, 389, 341, 431, 445, 446,
448.
selections of, 43, 231, 341, 448.
testing of, 282, 296.
INDEX.
539
Fruits, varieties before 1824, 54.
varieties at Cambridge, 1646-48, 14.
varieties in Plymouth Colony, 4.
varieties at Salem, 1799, 32.
Fuchsia gracilis, 218, 226, 248.
Fuchsias, fine, 308, 313.
Fungi, etc., 335, 420.
Gale, terrific, 360.
Gardening in Charleston, B.C., 27, 29.
in Florida, 27, 30.
in Maine, 18.
in Massachusetts, 1628-33, 4, 7.
1663-71, 10.
Rev. Francis Higginson's account of,
4.
in Pennsylvania, 23.
in Plymouth Colony, 2.
in Salem, 39.
in the South, 1773-78, 27.
love of the early settlers for, 1.
of French settlers in Illinois, 22.
Gardens, old, in Boston, 17.
prizes for, 289, 468.
at the South, 1823-29, 50.
General review of the Society's work, 454.
Genista tinctoria, 12.
Geranium show, 1838, 243.
Geraniums, seedling, 261.
exhibited in 1830, 225.
Gladioli, fine displays of, 337, 395.
perfection of, 429.
seedling, 335, 337, 395.
Gladiolus Calypso, 328.
floribundus, 240.
Natalensis or psittacinus, 232, 235, 244.
Gloriosa superba, 249.
Gloxinias, fine collection of, 319.
Goodale, Ephraim, nursery of, 19.
Gooseberries, collections of, 231, 237.
English, 223.
prize, 223, 382.
Gooseberry, Houghton's Seedling, 280.
Jolly Angler, 223.
Smith's Improved, 376.
Grafted trees, few in 1820, 44.
Grape, Adlrondao, 351.
Advance, 384.
Allen's Hybrid, 303.
Cannon Hall Muscat, 281.
Catawba, 36, 224, 461.
Concord, 302, 304.
Delaware, 306.
Diana, 261.
Eumelan, 357, 369, 378.
Golden Hamburg, 327.
Iona, 357.
Isabella, 461.
Grape, Israella, 378.
Lady Downes, 336.
Madrcsfield Court Muscat, 378.
Malaga, 218.
Martha, 384.
Moore's Early, 384, 432.
Mrs. Pince's Muscat, 384.
Muscat Hamburg, 327.
Portion Noir, 288.
Rebecca, 312.
Royal Ascot, 378.
Secretary, 384.
Walter, 359.
Grape vine, great, of Santa Barbara, 39.
Grapes, fine Concord, 355, 423.
fine Zinfindal, 258.
foreign, collections of, 280, 285, 293.
out-doors, 224.
large Black Hamburg, 303.
large bunches of Horatio or Nice, 231,
234.
large Syrian, 304.
native, fine displays of, 330, 339, 369.
Rogers's hybrid, 303, 328, 339, 347.
seedling. 359, 363, 369, 378, 389, 393, 423.
Graves, Master, New England's Planta-
tion, 5.
Gray, John C, address of, 236, 455, 457.
Gray, President Williatn, jun., address of,
436.
Greene, Gardiner, garden of, 18.
Greenhouse, hillside, 359.
Guano, experiments with, 259, 262, 285.
first known, 227.
Hall, larger, needed, 159.
in School Street, corner stone laid, 150.
cost of, 135.
dedication of, 153.
description of, 156.
first meeting in, 153.
store under, 158.
in Tremont Street, corner stone laid, 170,
182.
cost of, 137.
dedication of, 174.
description of, 176.
first meeting in, 174.
Halls, rent of hired, 133.
Hamilton, William, " The Woodlands," 35.
Hancock, Thomas, garden of, 18.
Harris, Dr. T. W., address by, 230.
his collection of insects, 211.
Heaths, collections of, 246.
Hedychium Gardnerianum, 227, 235, 351.
Helianthus tuberosus, 11.
Hepatica angulosa, 365.
Herbariums presented, 211.
540
MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Heuslcr, George, 31.
IIolcus saceharatus, 310.
Hollyhocks, doable, 227, 317, 328.
Horticulture as a fine art, 408.
the perfection of agriculture, 473.
Hosack, Dr. David, 41.
Hothouse, first, In New England, 18.
Hovey, President Charles M., 109.
addresses of, 171, 174, 182.
Ild_\ a carnosa, 228, 235.
Hunnewell, II. II., estate of, 315, 408.
Hyacinths, 243, 247.
Hybridizing, experiments in, 1739, 25.
Hydrangea Thomas Hogg, 419.
panicolata grandiflora, 395.
[matopbyllum minlatum, 354, 403.
Improvement in gardens, 311, 456, 468.
[ncome from admissions and assessments,
120.
from investments, 130.
from Mount Auburn, 129.
from stores and balls, 130.
of the Society, 120.
Incorporation of the Society, 63, 475.
Indians, agriculture of the, 1, 7, 10.
agriculture of the Six Nations, 31.
agriculture of the Southern, 28.
orchards of the, 11, 23, 28, 31.
planting of, in Boston, 13.
Information diffused by the Society, 469.
Inscriptions for corner stones, 151, 172.
Insects, injurious, 9, 10, 123, 211, 256, 367, 401,
424.
Institution for the education of gardeners,
103.
Intermixture of corn noticed in 1726, 17.
Investments of funds, 130.
Iresine Herbstii, 350.
Linden i, 3G2.
Iris Ksampferi, 353^439.
Jackson, John, collection of plants, 1777,
26.
" Johnny Appleseed," 38.
Josselyn, John, Voyages and Rarities, 8.
Kenrick, John, nursery established, 33.
Kenrlck, John A., 34.
Kenrick, William, nursery established, 34.
Klrtland, Dr. .Tared P., 38.
Knight, Thomas Andrew, new fruits from,
49.
Lagentrnmia Indica, 217, 258, 280.
Landreth, David, seed and nursery establish-
ment, 34.
Landscape gardening, 468.
Lapageria rosea, 328, 356.
Lataula Borbouica, 328, 362, 391.
Laurens, Henry, 2i).
Law for protection of orchards and gardens,
13.
Lettuces, new, 379.
Librarians, 203.
Library, 184.
catalogues of, 190, 202. •
cost of, 133.
decline of interest in, 191.
expenditures for, ISO, 192, 193, 194, 195,
190, IDS, 199, 201.
first action to gather, 1S5.
first purchase of books for, 187.
gifts of books for, ISo, 1S8, 190, 202, 204.
increase of interest in, 199, 201.
number of books in, 190, 203.
reading room opened, 199.
regulations for, 190, 200.
room incommodious, 198.
valuable books in, 205.
Lichens, collection of, 319.
Lilies, Japan, 2.34.
Japan, hardy, 2S3.
new species shown, 356, 366, 419, 440.
seedling Japan, 277.
Lilium auratum, 332, 366, 439.
candidum, fine, 350.
lancifolium album, 254.
Parkmanni, 302, 424.
superbum, 227, 251, 356.
Lily, new hybrid, Hovcyi, 350.
Lily of the valley, forced, 375.
Livingston, Chancellor, grounds of, 43.
Livingston, manor of, 43.
Logan, James, 27.
Longworth, Nicholas, 37.
Lonicera aureo-retlculata, 337.
Lowell, John, 33, 59.
new fruits introduced by,
on the progress of horticulture, 54, 472.
Lunt, Hon. George, dedication address, 155.
Lychnis angustifolia plena, 263.
Lycopods, 318, 322, 326, 327.
Lygodium palmatum, 32G.
scandens, 394.
Lyman, Theodore, grounds of, 50.
Magnolia cordata, 232.
purpurea, 232.
Maize, variegated Japan, 349.
Manning, Robert, pomological garden, 48.
Maranta Massangeana, 440.
zebrina, 223, 323.
Market gardens, deficiency in, 52.
Markets, improvement in, 470.
Marshall, Humphry, botanic garden of, 26.
INDEX.
541
Medals and plate as prizes, 279.
Medinilla magnifica, 331, 375.
Meetings for discussion in 1853, 300.
1871-78, 373, 379, 400, 416, 424, 434, 449.
Melia Azedarach, 30.
Melon, Christiana, 296.
Melons, collection of, 265.
fine, 370, 442.
Members, corresponding, 529.
honorary, 525.
list of, 500.
number of, 121, 533.
Michaux, Andre, 29.
Michaux, Francois Andre, 24.
M'Mahon, Bernard, 42.
Monstera deliciosa, 406.
Montgomery Place, 43.
Mount Auburn, addition to, 92.
amount paid to proprietors of, 136.
avenues laid out, 87, 91.
avenues named, 89.
cemetery named, 85.
choice of lots sold, 89.
conference with proprietors of, 113.
consecration of, 80.
diversity of interests in, 109.
first interments in, 93.
first purchasers of lots in, 80, 478.
gateway at, 92.
indentures with proprietors of, 114, 484,
490.
meetings of proprietors of, 114.
plan to dispose of, 110.
price of lots in, 90.
progress of, 91, 92, 95, 103, 105.
proprietors of, incorporated, 111, 483.
receiving tombs, 93, 104.
suggestions for laying out lots in, 94.
survey of, 85.
Movement for a building, 149.
Mulberries, 383.
for silk worms, 27.
Musa Cavendishii, 432.
coccinea, 228.
ensete, 358, 391, 398, 409.
BUperba, 428, 420.
Myrsiphyllum asparagoidcs, 306.
Narcissus, new, 375.
Natural productions of Massachusetts, 2, 5,
6, 8, 9.
of Pennsylvania, 23.
Nectarine, Boston or Lewis, 225, 291.
Stanwick, 309.
Nepenthes Chelsoni, 440.
distillatoria, 279, 299.
Nurseries in 1828, 50.
near Boston, deficiency in, 52.
Officers, first board of, 61.
list of, 498.
Oncidiuin llexuosum, 241.
Onions, Italian, 379.
Orange groves in Florida, 27.
Orange tics, etc., 220, 235, 459.
Oranges, etc., 393.
from Fayal, 250.
Orchard house fruit, 383, 404, 414.
house.-, 321, 325, 416.
Orchards in Michigan, 23.
Orchids, 241, 246, 356-, 361, 374, 387, 402, 408,
412, 41S, 428, 439, 440.
Organization of the Society, 61.
Pseonia Moutan, 232, 246, 354.
Pasonies, fine displays of, 251, 308.
Pampas grass, 323, 332, 3G2, 399.
Pandanus spiralis, 250.
Parkman, President Francis, address of, 435.
Parmentier, Andre, nursery, etc., 51.
Pea, Carter's First Crop, 354.
Champion of England, 203.
Commander in Chief, 432.
McLean's Advancer, 354.
William I., 3S9.
Peach, Columbia or Indian, 28.
Hale's Early, 3SS, 405.
Reine des Vergers, 383.
Royal George Clingstone, 263.
Salway, 327.
diseased, 36.
Peach trees at Germantown, Penn., 24.
at St. Joseph, Mich., 23.
naturalized, in Arkansas, 38.
Peaches, fine, 405.
fine Crawford's Early, 295, 338.
fine Crawford's Late, 322.
in New Jersey, 1GS3, 24.
in Pennsylvania, 1GS3, 23.
seedling, 244.
Shanghai, 313.
Pear, Belle Lucrative, 240.
Beurre d'Anjou, 2G5, 302.
Beurre de 1'Assomption, 397.
Beurre Bosc, 240, 201, 463.
Beurre Clairgeau, 297.
Beurre Gifiard, 293, 368.
Beurre Supcrfin, 302.
Bloodgood, 218.
Brown Beurre, 250.
Clapp's Favorite, 325, 358, 368, 377,
431.
Dana's Hovcy, 297, 317.
Dearborn's Seedling, 228.
Doyenne Boussock, 2G1.
Doyenne du Cornice, 296.
Doyenne d'Ete, 277.
542 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Pear, Duchcs.se d'Angouleme, 224, 232, 239.
largest, 33S.
Duchesse de Bordeaux, 877.
•n Belle, 3GS.
Elizabeth, 258.
Flemish Beauty, 252, 302.
blighted, 2
Frederick Clapp, 384.
Goodale, 347.
Harris
Howell, 2S5.
Lawrence, 261.
Louise Bonne of Jersey, 241.
Madame Henri Dispones, 406.
Mount Vernon, 325.
Onondaga, 2S1.
Petre, original tree of, 24.
Rosticzer, 241.
Seckel, 327.
history of, 460.
Bent to London, 41.
Sheldon, 297.
Souvenir du Congres, 397.
Striped St. Germain, 250.
Sugar, 4.
Tyson, 258.
Vicar of Winkfield, 250.
White Doyenne or St. Michael, 225, 250,
289, 302.
Winter Kelis, 241.
blight, first appearance of, 36.
orchard of Santa Clara College, 39.
Pear tree, Anthony Thacher, 3.
Governor Endicott, 11.
Governor Prince, 3.
Governor Stuyvesant, 20.
Ockletree, 37.
Pear trees, ancient, 15, 44.
large, at Detroit, 22.
ancient, at Kaskaskia, etc., 22.
in pots, 234, 250
Pears, ancient varieties, 4.
best Bummer, 377.
collections of, 234, 240, 244, 274, 285, 298
302, 304, 305, 317, 324, 333, 393.
der:» . 4;i.
line Bartlett, 324, 332, 396, 431.
fine Beurre Bosc, 422.
fine Beurre Die], 250, 302, 317.
fine Duchesse d'Angouleme, 250,297,362
432.
fine, from Nabant, 2S0, 289, 297.
fine Souvenir du Congres, 431.
fine specimens, 250, 302, 329, 336,368, 389,
397, 414, 422, 431.
from California, 362, 378.
from Norfolk, 862, 3S3.
from walls, etc., 277, 291.
Pears introduced by the Huguenots, 20.
large Seckel, 309, 406.
large Sheldon, 332, 368.
largest Winter Xelis, 432.
lists of premium, 294, 396.
most popular, 377.
native, 400, 4G1.
new in 1S30, 224.
new in 1 S35, 239.
new in 1SGG, 352.
new varieties, collections of, 378, 384.
Orange, 406.
seedling, 24S, 297, 332, 368, 384, 3S9, 393,
406.
size of, 463.
Peirce, Joshua and Samuel, 26.
Pelargonium exhibitions, 243, 411, 417.
Pelargoniums, prize, 1875, 411.
Penn, William, gardening in Pennsylvania,
23.
Perkins, Samuel G., new fruits introduced
by, 49.
Peters, Judge, garden of, 42.
Phaiua grandifolius, 420.
Phlox Drommondl, 242.
Phloxes, seedling, 247, 261, 313, 344, 3S8, 429
Phormium Coleneoi var., 395, 404, 440.
tenax var., 375, 413, 420.
Photographs of members, 201
rhyllotasnium Ltndeni, 429.
Pilgrims, report of explorers sent out by
the, 1.
Pineapple, Queen, 377.
Pineapples, 212, 247, 348.
Pines, cones of California species, 356.
Pioneers of fruit culture in the West, 38.
Plants, Australian, in 1827, 28.
collection of new and choice exotic, 329.
experimental, 259, 2G2, _
fine collection of, 1S77, 428.
from the Cape of Good llope 356.
increase of greenhouse, 22S, 231.
herbaceous, 337, 410.
native, 247, 248, 301, 361, 366, 386, 428.
native, interest in, 122, 247, 351, 354, 3S1,
44G, 465.
new, introduced, 446.
prize, 1SG2, 331, 332. 1S72, 3S1, 3S2.
1SG3, 335, 330. 1S73, 337, 395.
1SG4, 339. 1874,402,404.
1865, 348. 1875, 411, 413.
18G7, 354. 1S76, 417, 418,
1SGS, 355. 420, 421.
1869,361. 1S77, 427, 429.
1S70, 365, 366, 367. 187S, 438, 439,
1871,375. 440.
rare aquatic, 306.
at rhododendron show, 391.
INDEX.
543
Plants, succulent, 375, 395, 413, 421, 446.
variegated leaved, 304, 320, 322, 323, 326,
334, 336.
first collection of, 320.
at William Gray, jun's., 398, 399.
Plants and flowers in 1830, 226.
at annual show, 1S34, 235.
new, rare, or beautiful in 1835, 237.
1S37 and 1838, 1865, 348.
242, 244, 245, 1866, 350.
246. 1867, 353.
1840, 252. 1868, 356, 358.
1841, 255. 1369, 361, 362.
1842, 258. 1870, 365.
1845, 273. 1871, 374.
1847, 279. 1874, 402.
1848, 283. 1S75, 411, 413.
1S52, 297. 1S76, 419.
1S60, 323, 324. 1877, 429.
1861, 328. 1878, 438. •
Plum, Damson, 4.
Jefferson, 264.
Plums, collections of, 231, 263, 305, 313, 383.
failure of, 303.
Washington, 218, 223, 263, 264.
Polygonum Japonicum, 440.
Pomological conventions, 283.
Pomology, rules of, 282.
Pond lily, rose-colored, 350.
Poplar, Lombardy, 32, 35.
Portraits and busts, 124, 144, 163, 178, 1S2.
Portulacca Gilliesii, 246.
Potato beetle, 211, 424, 433.
Potato, Davis's Seedling, 306.
Early Goodrich, 352.
Early Rose, 358, 364, 370, 379.
Extra Early Vermont, 385.
Peerless, 370.
introduced, 30.
propagation of, 359.
Potatoes, collections of, 285, 310, 359, 364, 398,
415.
fine, 415, 442.
new, 407.
seedling, 2S5, 359, 364, 398.
Pratt, Henry, grounds of, 49.
Precedence of Massachusetts in horticulture,
472.
Preparation for a horticultural society, 55.
Presidents, portraits of the, 163, 182.
Prince, John, garden of, 52.
Prince's Linnasan Botanic Garden, 28.
Prize for nursery, 1768, 28.
list, first, 215, 492.
Prizes, amount paid in, 131.
appropriations for, 215, 242, 266, 272, 341
438.
first, awarded, 222, 495.
Prizes for collections of fruit, 298, 318, 321.
for gardens, 289, 292, 468.
for gladioli, 335.
for herbaceous plants, 337, 411.
for single dishes of fruit, 422.
Hunnewell Triennial, 126, 469.
award of, 373, 400.
prospective, 278, 466.
award of, 302, 305, 312, 347, 358, 379,
424, 432.
Schedule of, 262, 334.
Professors, first, 62.
Progress, encouraging, 238, 205.
of the Society in 1831, 67.
little, for two centuries, 44.
of horticulture before 1829, 64.
in 1S3S, 245.
in 1S46, 270.
Property of the Society in 1878, 138.
Prunes, 368.
Psidium Cattleyanum, 288.
Pteris Cretica albo-lineata, 336.
Publications, 206, 469.
cost of, 134.
Pursh, Frederick, 35, 40.
Pyrethrum roseum flore pleno, 350.
Ranunculus Asiaticus, 222, 263, 354.
Raspberry, Clarke, 376.
Herstine, 414.
Hornet, 404.
Knevett's Giant, 349.
Northumberland Fillbasket, 367.
Philadelphia, 357, 376.
Saunders, 414.
Raspberries, Dlaek Cap, 363, 376.
Receipts and expenses, 120, 135.
Review of first period, 205.
of second period, 341.
of third period, 443.
of the Society's work, 454.
Rhododendron arboreum, 245.
Daisy Rand, 365, 424.
bybridum, 245.
Mrs. John Clutton, 360.
show, 127, 390, 446.
Rhododendrons, displays of, 200, 317, 337,
360, 417, 428, 439.
etc., injured, 380.
Rhubarb, large, 2S1, 306, 432.
Monarch, 441.
Myatt's Victoria, 260.
Prince of Wales, 369.
Rhynchospcrmum jasminioides, 356, 361, 420.
Ribbon gardening, 360, 447.
Rcbin, food of, 315.
Robinson, William, account of exhibition,
370.
044 MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY.
Roehea falcata, 263.
Room in Cornbill, 144.
in North Market Street, 140.
in Trei t Row, 146.
Rooms at Ainory Hall, 163.
in .Toy's building, 143.
itlon of, 433.
Rose, Bon Silene, 2G0.
Chenedoltf, 277.
Climbing Devonlenaie, 381.
GHoire de 1'ijon, 317.
La l.'i'ine, 277, 3S7.
Macropbylla, 232.
Marechal Niel, 353.
Niphetos, 381.
Queen of the Prairies, 276.
Solfaterre, 277.
Souvenir de Malmaison, 277.
show, first, 287.
slug, destruction of, 256.
Rose bush, first in Illinois, 36.
Roses, bouquet of Scotch, 228.
in boxes, 418.
exhibition in 1830, 226.
finest iii I860, 322.
first forced Hybrid Perpetual, 411.
Hybrid Perpetual, 319, 322, 331, 335, 337,
357.
large collections of, 230, 248, 277.
prize, 1S73, 387.
1S74, 402. 1876, 418.
1875, 411. 1877, 427.
Sabbatia chloroides, 251.
Salaries of officers, 134.
Sancbezia nobilis, 358.
des sanguinea, 366.
Seiadopitys verticillata, 375, 399.
Beafortbia elegans, 391.
Seal of the Society, 66.
bore planting, 31S_
Season, exhibitions, etc.
1830, 222.
1831.
1S32, 229.
1833, 230.
1S34, 231.
1835, 236.
1836, 240.
1837, 241.
1838,242,
1839, 243.
1840, 250.
1841, S
1842, 256.
1843, 260.
1844, 262.
1845, 272.
, of, 1S29, 216.
1S46, 270.
1847, 278.
1848, 2S2.
1849, 2S6.
1S50, 2S9.
1851, 21)2.
1852, 297.
1853, 299.
1S54, 303.
1855, 306.
1556, 308.
1557, 312.
185S, 315.
1S59, 319.
1860, 321.
1861, 325.
Season, exhibitions, etc. of, 1S62, 329.
1803, 334.
1864, 336.
1865, 346.
1866, 349.
1867, 352.
1868, 355.
1869, 360.
1870, 364.
1871,373.
1872, 879.
1873, 386.
1574, 400.
1875, 410.
1576, 417.
1577, 426.
1575, 436.
Seasons, unfavorable, 229, 240, 287, 319, 325
355, 3S6.
Seders and grasses, 3S7.
Seedlings, encouragement to raise, 466.
Seeds, care in saving, 423, 441.
donations of, 98, 214.
etc., by mail, 271.
etc., sent toXew England, 11.
from Patent Office, 316.
in 1769, 31.
Sempervivums, collections of, 375.
Sequoia gigantea, 300, 332.
Shaddocks, 228, 235.
Shade trees in Boston, 18.
Silk exhibited, 218.
Simpson, M. II., experiments with grapes,
306, 310, 314.
" SmUax," 306.
Society, Albany Horticultural, 45.
American Pomological, 283, 305,333,342,
390, 392.
Caledonian Horticultural, 47.
Domestic Horticultural, 45.
London Horticultural, 46.
Massachusetts Agricultural, 32.
New York Horticultural, 44.
Paris Horticultural, 47.
Pennsylvania Horticultural, 45.
Philadelphia Agricultural, 32.
South Carolina Agricultural, 32.
Spiraea palmata, 375.
Squash, Autumnal Marrow, 236, 269, 297.
Hubbard, 315, 344.
Squashes, Bne exhibitions of, 265, 308, 433.
Standard forjudging flowers, 331.
Stanhopes insignia, 246.
tigrina, 306.
Statues, report of Committee on, 177.
Stephanotia floribunda, 273.
" Sti 'a Woods," 72.
Story, Judge, 88, 112.
dedication address, 83.
Strawberry, Admiral Dundas, 312, 331.
Agriculturist, 346, 357.
Belle, 3S8.
Caroline, 3S3, 414.
Charles Downing, 367.
Col. Cheney, 382, 413.
Crescent Seedling, 421.
INDEX.
545
Strawberry, Gen. Sherman, 421.
Grace, 414.
Hervey Davis, 421.
Hovey's Seedling, 248, 260, 283, 327, 338,
349, 413.
Jenny Lind, 293, 312, 349.
Jucunda, 357, 363, 367.
Keens's Seedling, 223.
La Constante, 322, 327, 357, 367, 376, 440.
Nicanor, 382.
President Wilder, 349, 363, 367, 376, 424.
Sir Harry, 312.
Triomphe de Gand, 357.
Wilson's Albany, 319, 357, 363.
Strawberries, abundance of wild, 6.
best in 1851, 296.
collections of, 291, 293, 303, 338.
in cold frames, 388.
leading varieties, 1874, 404.
new, 1873, 388.
prize, 223, 327, 351, 367, 376, 404, 413, 440.
seedling, 257, 376.
Strelitzia augusta, 249.
Stuyvesant, Governor, garden of, 20.
Sub-tropical gardening, 359, 447.
" Sweet Auburn," 72.
offer to sell, 73.
plan to purchase, 78.
Sweet corn introduced, 31.
Taxodium distichum, at Bartram Garden,
24.
Thomas, David, collection of plants and
trees, 51.
Thorburn's seed and flower store, 41.
Thunbergia Harrisii, 408.
Tomato, Boston Market, 370.
Conqueror, 407.
Gen. Grant, 358, 370.
Perfected, 324.
Trophy, 370.
introduction of the, 40.
Tomatoes, 248, 273, 344.
fine displays of, 433, 442.
new, 354, 389, 415.
Treasurers, 139.
Triennial festival, first, 259.
second, 274.
third, 286.
Tritoma Uvaria, 320.
Tuberoses, large, 27.
Turnips, collections of, 251, 333.
Vaughan, Benjamin and Charles, 19.
Vegetables exhibited in 1834, 236.
exhibited in 1848, 286.
forcing, 227, 353, 369, 448, 471.
houses for forcing, 363, 448.
improvement in, 269, 344, 423, 441, 445,
448, 465.
Verbena Tweediana, 244.
Verbenas, collections of, 251, 317.
Viburnum plicatum, 366.
Victoria regia, 300, 343.
Vineyards at Philadelphia, 16S3, 1685, 21.
Walker, President Samuel, 269.
address of, 289.
Ward, Dr. M. A., address by, 228.
Wardian cases, 314.
Washington as a horticulturist, 32.
Weeds, foreign, introduced, 9, 19, 25.
Weigela rosea, 47, 292.
Wharton, Silas, nursery of, 37.
Whitmore, Charles O., 169.
Wilder, President Marshall P., addresses of,
152, 379, 450.
bust of, 164.
Wilson, John A., and Samuel, 51.
Window gardening, 444.
Wine, currant, manufacture of, 34.
Wine making in Illinois, 1769, 36.
at Lexington, Ky., 1799, 36.
at Vevay, 1802, 37.
Winship nursery, 48.
Winters, severe, 229, 240, 312, 355, 380, 410.
Winthrop, Governor, vineyard and orchard,
13.
Winthrop, John, jun., fruit tree culture, 14.
Wistaria Sinensis, or Consequana, 47, 243,
247.
Sinensis flore pleno, 365.
Wood, William, New England's Prospect, 0.
Yucca gloriosa, 218.
Zinnia, double, 328.
3477
X291
(Y
-
•
> 4
J,0°x.
H 1 ^ ^ ^
\0 c>
VV
.*
<\
%
A
^ ^
X ^.
"b o N
o5 ^>
; "» -v
v •*>.
* <•-
•>>
^. v*
V
^
^ -
C '
vOo.
■
,^%,
^ v *
,3 ^
\\
\0 O
\V
r>
o o
v^ %
<*-,