.5 .Dii .:^ EEMARKS OP HON. J:Fr®OWDELL, OF ALABAMA, ON THE ORGANIZATION OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. DELIVERED ON THE 9Tn OF JANCTAEY, 1850. WASHINGTON PRINTED AT THE CONGRESSIONAL GLOBE OFFICE. f N 1S56. f\ ■A ORGANIZATION OF THE HOUSE. Mt. PAINE, of North Carolina, submitted the following resolution, which he supported by a few remarks: Resolved, That the Hon. William R. Smith, of Alabama, he chosen to preside as temporary chairman of this House until a Speaker be elected. Mr. DOWDELL said: Before proceeding to give my vote , T desire to say a few words. I must confess, as an American citizen, representing in part a people who arc sober, quiet, and conserva- tive, who love their country — a religious commu- nity — I am exceedingly pained at the spectacle which has been presented to-night and for the last weeks by the American Hous-e of Represent- atives, in the middle of the ninetecntli century. I am disposed to recur to tlie history of the past, ' preeminently before my mind — when Rome was burning, Nero was fiddling and dancing. To my mind, merriment is altogether out of place and ill-timed. Now, sir, while this House is indulg- ing in this spectacle of amusement — and I speak kindly of it, for I suppose it is somewhat in the spirit of passing aM-ay an idle hour withou*. the pro.spect of an organization soon — whilst in the midst of laughter, we arc standing upon a slum- bering volcano. Upon our borders, m the com- mon territory of this country, our people are marshaling their forces to try the great question as to whether they arc able to govern themselves — it may be with rifles in their hands. It becomes us to look, as patriots, seriously, soberly, these grave questions in the face. It becomes us to maintain that gravity due to the consideration of questions now being forced upon us, which involve the peace and happiness of our people and the permanence of our institutions. I have been reminded by tiie ludicrous scenes witnessed here, of a parallel to be found in a book entitled "Geor- fia Scenes," which I read many y'ars since, t was penned by Judge Longstreet, formerly of Georgia. Ned Brace, the hero of tlie story, hap- pened in a city during the prevalence of a great fire — the flames in red voluims were rising higher and higher each moment — the peojile were run- ning to and fro in great consternation — women and children were screaming through the streets, and the midnight fire-bells were sending out their rapid and startling sounds, when Ned quietly took his position on the side-walk. About this time a large, old man, nearly out of breath, came running by in great haste, whose home was threatened with destruction perhaps, and was abruptly stopped by Nod with the interrogatory: " Sir, can you tell me where I can find Peleg Q,. C. Stone?" "Damn Peleg Q,. C. Stone! my house is on fire !" was the impatient reply. Now, sir, while the fire of civil war is threatening to be kindled upon our borders, whoso flames once started may not be quenched until the temple of our liberties is burnt up, and the last hope of hu- manity for freedom is extinguished in the breast of man, questions are propounded here quite as imp(?rtinent at this time of danger, and calcula- ted to provoke similar impatience, if not a similar reply. Sir, those questions about the extension of the naturalization laws, and the " corrupting tenden- cies of the Roman Catholic church," can be der cided by our ]ieople, and we shall have a decision at the proper time; and I have no fear that any party in this country opposed to religious hberty, will ever be strong enough to control its legisla- tion. I have no iear that the rights of our fel- low-citizens, native or adopted, or of those who may hereafter emigrate to this country, will now be infringed, or that the people of this country will ever consent to be .shackled by any party proposing to interfere with the rights of conscience, or suffer the avenues to citizenship, opened by the wisdom and generosity of our republican fathers to their oppressed and suffering neighbors across the ocean, to be blocked up. AVe have no fear of this — none at all ; our apprehensions in this regard have been entirely removed, after witnessing the election results of the last fe^v months. A pro- position to that effect I understood to have been made by a small party — at least, whether so in- tended or not, the inference from the platform laid down was legitimate, and it embodied a selfish principle which would, in my humble judgment, if carried out, wither the prosperity | of this great and glorious American nation. Let ■ us reflect for a moment. At an early period of , ourhistoiy — yes, sir, during our great Revolution •which gave freedom to this continent, and tlfe hope of it to the world — when we were weak, few in number, poor in purse, but of large and liberal hearts— when we were unable to cope with j the nations of the earth without the aid of patriots from other lands, we threw open our doors, and > invited foreigners — yes, sir, /ore toners, to come in and partake with us the perils of defending our | liberty. They generously responded to the invi- . ; tation, and the portrait which there graces our'; walls [pointing to a portrait of La Fayette] will : ^ carry us back to the time when France sent out her volunteers to fight side by side with Amcri- ! , cans for liberty; and the memory of that great nmn, united in our aflections with that of thej glorious Washington, will not be forgotten by a ' free and grateful people, but the glOry of their 1 j joint deeds, common sutierings, and common , struggles, will be transmitted to the remotest pos- terity. When we were weak we invited them ' in. They came: their bones whiten every battle ! field, and their heroic deeds illuminate every page of our history. The same hope which cheered the heart of the American soldier filled | the breast of the Irish, the Scotch, the French, ' the German, the Pole. Yes, sir— all, all fought ' for, many died for the blessings of liberty to their children. Now, when we are sti-ong— a powerful people, population large, and an over- flowing treasury — fully able, without the aid of patriot foreigners, to take care of ourselves, . a portion of us arc disposed to say that they ; shall not come in and be citizens upon equal terras with us, on safe conditions. When we occupy broad and rich lands, capable, under the ' hand of industry, to yield food and clothing j enough to furnish the millions of earth; when we | have a population large enough, strong, intelli- | gent and moral enough, to assimilate all who come under the natural law controlling emigration;, when we know that they whose fathers fell by i the side of our fathei's, are now bound down to ihe earth under the iron heel of despotism, and who pant for this land of promise as the " hart panteth after the water brooks," I ask, shall this magnanimous RepubUc at once ignore its duty and its destiny by closing the door agciinst those who knock so earnestly and cntreatingly? NeVer, sir, by my consent. They are our brethi-en. This earth is God's earth, and he who taught us to love our neighbor will not forgive us if we do not. He who said, " Thou shalt not vex the stranger; thou shalt not oppress him in any wise: if you do, and he cry unto me, I will hear his cry, and I will kill you with tlie sword; your wives shall become widows and your children orphans," will not fail to avenge such wickedness. May we continue the wise policy under which we have, by the blessing of Providence, prospered so largely , avert the curses which we should so richly deserve for persecution and proscription, and make this nation what our fathers designed it — a blessing to mankind — a house of refuge for the oppressed — an asylum for the sufl'erers of earth ! [Here the hammer fell.] Mr. DOWDELL. I wish to say, as there is a question pending, wliich was by my colleague's vote laid over until to-moirow, that I am indis- posed to allow a resolution upon the same basis to take pi-ecedence, and therefore I shall vote no. Mr. ZOLLICOFFER offered the follo-iving resolution, and at the same time submitted the interrogatories which follow: Resohed, That in conformity witli the principles of a great popular Government, such as that of the Ujiited States, it is the duty of all candidates for political position frankly and fully to state their opijiions upon important political ques- tions involved in tlieir el,^ction, and especially when they are interrogated by the bodjj of electors whose votes they are seeking. " I ask whether I am right in supposing that the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Richardson] regards the Kansas-Nebraska, bill as promotive of the foniiation of free States in the Territories of Kansas and Nebraska ? "Am I right in supposing he advocates the constitutionality of the Wilniot proviso; that in 1850 he opposed its application to the temtories acquired from Mexico, only upon the ground that I it was unnecessary, inasmuch as the Mexican local laws in those territories alreadj'- abolished slavery — which ought to be sufficient for all Free- Soil men; and that he committed himself to the position that if territorial bills (silent upon the j subject of slavery, and leaving the Mexican law ' to operate) were defeated, he v.'ould vote for bills with the Wilniot proviso in them? " Am I right in supposing that his theory is, i that the Constitution of the United States does not carry slavery to, and protect it in, ths Territories ' of the United States? That in the territory ac- quired from France, (including Kansas and Ne- braska,) the Missouri restriction was necessary ' to make the territory free, because slavery existed there under France at the time of the acquisition, I but that the Kansas and Nebraska bill, which repeals that restriction, but neither legislates I slavery into those Territories nor excludes it j therefrom, in his opinion, leaves those Territories without either local or constitutional law protect- ing slavery; and that therefore the Kansas and Nebraska bill promotes the formation of free States j in Kansas and Nebraska?" I Mr. DOWDELL (on his name being called) 'isaid: Before recording my vote, I wish to make a remark, not however for the purpose of justify- , i ing the vote which I shall give—for I am astonished to find anj'^ gentleman opposed to the passage of the resolution — but to finish what I should have ! said when last on the floor, had not the time allotted me expired. Although I have no appre- hension that any party in this country committed ' to proscription or persecution of individuals for ' religious opinions, or on account of the place of their birth, will, if the fact be known, ever control its legislation, yet 1 must confess that there is danger, if those who seek power are permitted to conceal opinions. In this country, where every ' individual is a sovereign — each an atom of that gi-eat aggregate nyass whose united public opin- ' ion under constitutional limits makes and executes laws, I hold it to be the duty of each and all to communicate freely — to withhold notiiing the one ' from the other — to conceal no opinion, principle, j or position politically aflecting the interests of the country. This I regard absolutely necessary, in '\ order that every citizen may properly and under- 5 etan(Jingly discharge his duty. Why, sir, se- crecy in regard to political tenets contradicts the fundamental idea of a Democratic Government. If, then, every citizen is entitled to know the politi- cal opinions of his neighbor, much more is he en- titled to those opinions when they arc to become liis own through a Representative — when they are to find expression in laws enacted, and force in laws executed. In voting for the ponding resolution, I simply indorse what I esteem a sound principle — a safe practice. \ By the results of the questions to be propounded vuider it, I do not expect to be en- lightened: but the country will have facts and opinions placed before it in a more authoritative form, coming from the candidates of th(> various parties in this House, than having to rely simply upon the declarations of respective friends. I do not see why any should oppose its adoption. The oiRce of Speaker of the House is high and responsible. There are contingencies set forth in the Constitution, upon the hapjiening of which it may become the highest ])ost in the Govern- ment. Let opportunity be afforded for complete and full development — for questions to be asked and answered, until all are satisfied — the country satisfied. It is needless for me to repeat in word what I have expressed by more than a hundred votes — that I pnfer for the speakership the gal- lant statesman from Illinois, [j\lr. Ricuaudsox.] It is not for the purpose of getting at his opinions that I wish to see the resolution passed. I know that he stands upon .safe and sure ground. He is a national Democrat, willing to deal justly with all sections of the Union — according to both States and individuals their full constitutional rights. He stood upon the Kansas and Nebras- ka act — that great measui'e which asserted that the people ought to be allowed to govern them- selves, subject only to the Constitution. Upon this princi]i!e the Democratic party have planted its standard, and under its folds all the conserva- tism and national men of the Union will rally; and upon this they will succeed and preserve the integrity of this great Rcpubhc. Now, sir, I doubt not but that each member may know the position of his own candidal^; but, sir, I want the constituents, the people, to know the position of ihe candidates from the can- didates themselves. I want the people to know clearly how all stand upon the great and leading question which will enter into the next elections, and decide, in my huml)le opinion, the destiny of this country. Sir, upon this great and' lead- ing question, the gentlimen composing what is called the Black Republican party, have taken position .sectional in character, and aggressive towards the South. I want the lines clearly de- fined and drawn early, which divide parties, in order that the people of all sections, who are deeply interested in preserving this Government, may know with Which to allj'- themselves — may know whether their influence" is \vield(d to pull down or l>uild up. As I have said before, I have but little f'ar of the Know Nothing party; not that I do not regard some of its in-incipll's odious, and its whole tendency dangerous, but, as in my judgment it attacks individual rights, ap- pertaining to every citizen, North, East, South, and West, of course, sooner or later, it must go down; all will become interested in opposing its principles, v/hen made to understand that they are injurious to themselves. Not so with the Black Republican party. Sectional and fanatic, it is bent upon the destructi(m of the rights of a whole section. It threatens to do that which can- not be done without being followed by a speedy dissolution of these States. I make free to declare my opinion , not by way of threatening, but, I trust , as a patriot, who desires the best interests of his country, that if the gentlemen who are in a ma- jority in this House fairly represent the section of the Union from which they come, — if they are the types of norilnrn majorities, and the principles which I understand them to profess shall become the settled opinions of controlling majorities in the northern States, and .shall be attempted to be I made law in this country, through the forms of Federal legislation, then the continued Union of these States will be an impossibility, or, if pos- sible, the greatest curse which could be inflicted upon my people. I make no threats. I say what I most verily believe. I speak because I love the Union of the Constitution. I love it for its mem- orie.s — for the hallowed recollections of the mar- tyrs who died in the struggle to tranj^nit its j; principles to us — for its present blessings, which I I hope may be continued to the latest generation. j! Sir, I want the people to know who desires to I' preserve it — who pursues a course calculated to l| destroy it. I shall therefore vote not only for jjtliis resolution, but facilitate all inquiries after Irtruth. I It matters not with me what maybe the object I of the resoliition, or for what purpfse the inter- M rogatories are to be propounded after its adoption; l! nor shall I take exception because it originates |i with a party that commenced its career in secrecy, j and thereby evinced a distrust of the soundness j of its own principles by carefully avoiding all |i public discussion of them. Belonging-, as 1 do, ; to a party whose creed is never written or .spoken "in an," unknown tongue" — the first article of [j whose faith is, unwavering confidence in the intel- '! ligenco,' integrity, and patriotism of the masses; !| that never shrinks from responsibility; that avows il opinions under any and all circumstances; that, 'l in open day, in presence of friends and opponents, j always marches square up to public opinion, the I great arbiter between truth and error in a free |, country, and challenges investigation, defies sciii- i; tiny, and demands — ay, demands judgment upon ]; the correctness of its propositions, — it is not for me to object to the resolution; but rather to thank the gentleman for its introduction. Il affords I another opportunity for the exhil>ition of candor i and fairness on the part of the Democracy; while at the same time it rebukes, with the keenest , irony, the party from v.-hich it proceeds, whose earlier meetings were held nobody kiiev.- when or where; whose principles were nobody knew what; whose language of communication was signs, and grips, and curiously cut bits of paper; whose name even, concealed from the outside world, has been dubbed " Know Nothing," after the uniform rei)ly of its members t^3 every inquiry made, and has thus perpetuated its refusal to come to the light, and whose very existence and all its prin- ciples, ill the language of the gentleman from Gi>orgia, [Mr. Stepiiexs,] "were shielded by an calh." It is a good indication, I trust, that the ; injunction of secrecy which has been gradually dissolving under the steady light of a soixnd public i opinion, will be entirely removed, and the little book of ceremonies, known as the Ritual of the j Order, will, in due time, be given to the public, ' revised and corrected, if need be, with a free translation of the * * * which twinkle on its pages. Yv''hen this shall have been done, we shall be better prepared for the answers of the respect- ive candidates — to compare each with the creed of his party, and pass judgment accordingly. Our candidate, I will repeat, stands upon safe ground. His record , of many years ' service in this House during many of the most trying periods of our history, is before the country. His votes uniformly vindicate his nationality, and prove his devotion to the Constitution and the rights of the South under it. Whatever may be his opin- ions upon abstract questions, upon some of which we do doubtless differ, his acts arq, nevertheless, satisfactory to me and my people, and, we believe, promotive of the best interests of the whole coun- try. This decides my preference, and I yield him my hearty support. I will not liow enter upon a discussion of the principles involved in the interrogatories pro- poundcCl by the gentleman from Tennessee, [Mr.' ZoLLicoFFER.] Whatever may be the opinions of those who voted for the Kansas and Nebraska act, will not now affect the operation -of the law itself. Under it a government has been organized, and, for the exercise of its powers within the limitations of the Constitution of the United States,- will be responsible only to the people to be affected by them. It is enough for me to know, in this crisis, whether a man is loyal to the great princi- i pie contained in that act — whether he is willing ! to abide by it as a settlement, a final settlement, j of the slavery question, and is willing that it shall j bS" applied in the organization of all future terri- , toriafgovernments, and thus assist in removing ! the discussion from these Halls, and transferring the exercise of the powers of government to the jieople, to whom the exercise of it, under our theory of government, properly belongs, and whose welfare is most deeply involved in the results. Now, sir, the people will doubtless inquire, why all national men who hold to the doctrine o^ non-interventio)i by Congress on the subject of slavery in the Territories, cannot unite in the (support of the gentleman from Illinois, whose illustrious service in behalf of this measure dur- ing the last Congress contributed so much to its success? I shall not pretend to answer for others; I only speak for myself; and I am proud, as a southern man, that opportunity is afforded me to cast my vote for Mr. Richardson, and by doing so to testify to him, and his noble compeers who stood by us in the conllict, and, with a moral cour- age worthy of the best days of the Republic, battled against the prejudices of their own sec- tion, and restored to my people their rights under the Constitution, my lasting gratitude and high appreciation of their patriotism. They deserve well of the whole country, and, though tempora- rily condemned by the thoughtless and fanatical, yet that purified and chastened public opinion which flows from the "sober second Uiought" of the American people will amply rew^ftrd them in its judgment for their action, and vindicate, along with the peaceful fruits of its operation, the wisdom of the law which they assisted to enact. An infraction of the Constitution has been healed, a loss to the rights of the States has been restoi-*d, and a stigma upon the institutions of the South has been removed by the repeal of the Missouri restriction. Our equal right to occupy and enjoy the com- mon territory is no longer denied by unjust legislation. For this victory we are indebted to the national Democrats of the North. Many fell in the struggle which achieved it, but they will rise again , for around them are gathered the sympathies of a grateful people, and they will stand forth the acknowledged champions of truth, when those who now fill their places will pass quietly away into oblivion. Whilst almost the entire South acknowledges the obligation of grat- itude to the national men of the North, it is to be deeply regretted that the policy of a new party in our midst prevents its expression at this crit- ical juncture. I do not contend that our united vote would elect a Speaker, but none are blind enough not to see that our divisions materially weaken our common cause. Our enemy, and the enemy to the Constitution, although divided upon numberless subordinate questions, are, nevertheless, united and compacted in their ag- gressions upon our rights. They, too, dispute about Catholics and foreigners, and are "at en- j mity between themselves^" but, like Pilate and I Herod, are made friends when the rights of the I South are to be destroyed. i Whence came our dissensions? It seems that I this new order was manufactured by Yankee in- j genuity expressly for the occasion, and thro^vn, if I may so express it, into the South to divide 1 our forces at the very time the heaviest assault was to be made upon us. How far they have succeeded the country must judge. The Black Republican party moves in solid column, ani- mated by one feeling — hatred to the South and all the friends of the South. They have com- menced their attacks upon our nort^hern allies. Are we unitedly rushing to the rescue ? Why are they so determined on thedefeat of Richardson? Because he is a Democrat? Not so, for they number many who were formerly Democrats among them. They do it because he led the forces that repealed the Missouri restriction, and now, like a true man, stands up and vindicates the jus- tice and righteousness of that action. For the same reason they are endeavoring to strike down the present Administration. Because our patriotic President refuses to bow to their fanatic demands, and join the crusade against southern institutions; because, like an old Roman, he stands firmly by the Constitution of -his country, guarding the rights of all sections, he, too, is denounced, and must be victimized to satisfy the insatiable appe- tite of this Black Republican faction. Will a single southern man assist in the sacrifice? God I forbid ! For his uniform and steadfast devotion ; to sound principles during his whole administra- j tion, and for the noble sentiments and unanswer- able arguments which characterize his late mes- 1 sage in buhalf of the rights of the States, he deserves the thanks of every lover of his country. I The conservative masses of our countrymen, ' North and South, will rally around him, tor the , great cause which he espouses belongs alike to I us all. For the continued disorganization of this House, I shall leave the country to locate the responsi- bility. Nothing but a most fearful sectional contro- versy has brought this confusion upon us. That such is the fact I deeply dejilore, but do not regret its manifestation. The discovery of the seat of the disease will enable us to find a remedy. The constitution of the body-politic, I trust, is strong enough to survive the attack. Far better that the present Congress should utterly fail to organize, than even tlie semblance of victory should be given to Black Republicanism by the success of Its champion. Should the whole matter, by the failure of organization, he referred again to the people, I have strong confidence that a represent- ation would be returned here national and con- servative, prepared to do full justice to all sec- tions, and willing to abide the compromises of the Constitution in letter and spnit. Acting upon this conviction, for one, I shall continue to hold the position wliich I have taken to the end of the chapter. During the debate which followed the passage of the resolution, Mr. RICHARDSON made the following re- marks: Mr. Clerk, the gentleman from Tennessee seems to misunderstand the remarks which I made on last Saturday; and I desire to say to the gentleman only this: in 1850, when I submitted the remarks To which he refers, and while I dis- cussed the position assumed by various gentle- men on this floor, I then stated that it was the duty of Congress to pass laws in reference to this question, and to let the people decide, when they came to frame their constitution, what their do- mestic institutions should be. I endeavored to bring them to the point by showing what their positions respectively were. I will say to the gentleman, further — for I do not desire that my poi?ition on this question shall be niisu))dcrstood eithir here or elsewhere — that I stated then, and I state now, that any remark which I may have made then, or at any other time, that I was willing to vote for the Wilmot proviso, or anything else which was not a fair, just, and equitable adjustment of all these ques- tions between the States and the people of the States, was made with a view to bring the friends of the Administration to a particular point. In the remarks made in 1850, and to which he refers, I there stated that my object was to bring the Administration of General Taylor to the test, to see whether his northern or southern supporters had been deceived. It was not for any other reason. 1 stated, on Satiu-day last, that 1 had not acted in accordance with those declarations, and that, if I had, I should have committed a wrong and unjust act. When the bills of 1850, which recognize the same principle as the Nebraska- Kansas act, were passed, I took my position on the ground which I now occupy. I want to say another thing. I am one of those who change my opinions when I think that they are wrong ones. I disavow any sentiment which I have uttered when I think that it is wrong. I said, the other day, that while I believe, accord- ing to the letter of the Constitution, we had a right to exclude slavery , yet, at the same time, as it was unjust and wrong, I say, in my opinion, it violated the spirit of the Constitution; for that Constitution was made to secure equality among all the States and the citizens of the Union LIBRftRY OF CONGRESS 011 897 874 2 iT'^ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 011 897 874 2