TIMHLV S((i(tKST1()\S Republican Editors of ()hi( HON. R()I'>!:rt v. I'()RTi:k. ()!•■ XKW \()|LKr ol 11 IK Ohio Rkitulican Lkaciul:. riiui'sday E2'cnino\ February u, iSgi, Memorial Hali Toledo. IKKANA ClTI/KN AND C.AZKTTK PkiNT. i<()r.i.i()NSE R()HI:RT I'. PORTER, Xkw York. Afr. President and Ladies and Geufiemcn : I am one of tlie editors who was assij4nL'cl to a home mission. It has not been a very agreeable one either in some respects. So lonj^ as the decennial census of the United .States has to be taken under the social conditions that have prevailed during- the last quarter of a centurv, conditions iinohins.;- threat moxcmcnts ot poj)ulation, the sudden ui)risin_y; and rapid growth of numerous communities, and a [perpetual struggle for commercial and political supremacv between different sections of our common country, so long will a census without complaints be an impos- siblity. In consecjuence of this I am obliged to feel my way a little when I light down upon a community. For example, on my arrival here this morning, I interviewed the hotel barber on the subject of the population of Toledo, he of course not suspect- ing my identity. "What is the po]>ulation of Toledo ?" .said I with an air »jf causual inilifierence. "Why," .said he, with a tone of contempt, "K\en those Governnuiii fellows give us 84,000, but we have about 104, rxx)." The remaiiuler of that shave passed in the brilliancv of ofticial silence. As with cities, so with States, and |)erhaps I owe \'our own splenditl .Stale an apology for chang- ing it from the third to the fourth .State in the I'nion. Tho.se of vou, however, who read the Democratic papers will imderstand how this came about. \'ou see, according to oiu" Democratic friends, I h.i\e depressed the census in DeUKtcratic States and in- llated it in Repul)lican .States, and 1 hap])eued to strike Ohio dur- ing a Democratic period. N'ow, ladies and genlKnun, if vou will agn-e to redeem the .Statt- from Democrati<" rule, and should I ever takr another census, I will do niy best to |)Ut you hark into the proud position of third State of this oreat Republic. Seri- ously speakint>-. this chanj^e is entirely due tt) the tremendous in- crease in the population of Chicago. Tlu- increase in city population in Ohio was nearly 46 per cent, and (if the rural po])ulation nearly 5 cent. In Illinois the city population increased a trifle over 92 per cent, while the rural districts only show an increase of 1.88 per cent. — less than two per cent. In the country districts therefore you are more \igorous than your neighboring' State of Illinois. But I must get down to my toast. The toast assigned me. "The Press, from the Standpoint o' American Journalism," has seen its best days. The bones have been picked by abler and more eloquent jiens and tongues than mine. The newspaper of to-day has become such a vast and mul- titudinous institution that it rc(|uires more courage than I possess to discuss in it its entirety at a banquet where so manv able orators and statesmen are to charm you with their graceful utterances and impress you witli their \igorous ideas. WOLVES IX SHI-.EP'S CLOTHING. The press, fellow Republicans, as you know, assumes the func- tion to set us right on all subjects, including, as I have said, the census. Taking achantage therefore of the elasticity of my toast I shall ignore the broader treatment of the subject and confine my remarks to a few suggestions which I hope may be of special interest to Republican editors. At the present time the Demo- cratic party is far better equipped in the direction of cheap and popular newspapers than we arc. The so-called independent newspapers ars all "gone" on free trade and cheap labor, and here and there we find journals sailing under Republican colors supplying the enemy with articles on thetariff that do more to dis- turb the public mind on that question, and to lulp the cause of free trade, than the open batteries of the enemy. It is also safe to say that the circulation of free trade Democratic newspapers is twice that of Republican newspapers. Nearly all the cheap one and two cent news[)apers, with large circulation, are Democratic. THK BEST EIELI) I"()U (iOOI) P.M'ERS. The greatest need of the Re])ublican party to-day is the estab- lishment of l)right and cheai) nc\\s|)apers in our centers ol indus- trial and comnurcial encr^)-. Wliy in the South, the field has practically been abandoned! The ^reat industrial regions of the New South have no great popular newspaper of National reputa- tion to speak out vigorously in defense of the system which has made jiossible the progress and development of those States dur- ing the last decade. And yet how much could be said, with tre- mendous effect, by such newspapers, Uxated at a dozen points in the South. rHK MAN MOST HAIKD AHROAD. The issue of 1.S92 is now before the people. To a very large extent we all know it must be the i)atriotic measure which bears the name of the great Ohio statesman (McKinlkv) who is present here to-day. That name is as much hated by those who believe the best and cheapest machine is man, as it is loved by those who believe that the safety of the Republic depends in no small de- gree upon the welfare of our bread-winners and the comfort of our homes. To that measure then, and to the princii)les which it invokes, the Republican j^ress should unhesitatingly direct its etlitorials. 1 HF. ( hai.i.kn(;k \vk acckpt. No efforts should be spared to popularize the discussion of the tariff. Made bold by their temporary victory last fall, the Demo- cratic organs have taken up the McKinley bill and propose to dis- cuss it. Republican editors throughout the country, I beg of you, accept this challenge! The more intelligent discussion we have of that bill, the more certain will be our victory in 1892. Discuss it in all its phases. From the standpoint of American homes, of American wages, of American productions, of American prices, of American ingenuity. Analyze it with a \iew to ascertaining whether or not the employment of several hundred thousand workmen here at home, in industries heretofore conducted in foreign countries, docs not give a market right at home for mil- lions of pounds of pork and millions of bushels of grain. .Study the census figures of 1S90 and find out that the increase in the j)()pulation of the growing de\eloping industrial centers of these Western States is rapidly encroaching on the food-j^roducing capacity of your fields. A hi:ni:i ri lo i akmi.k and akiisan. Stiuiv it in the tal>les showiii!;- the iivera^v piicos ot ^niin in maiuifacturiiio- aiul agricultural States ; and then tell me if this in- crease in manutacturinj;- is ni)t beneficial alike to ix\rmer and artisan. If the American farmers could only learn the truth about the home market the free traders would be compelled to abandon all attempts to carry a sing-le Northern agricultural State. I hav^e gone to considerable pains to ascertain the average home prices of farm products in eight farming States and eiglit manufacturing- States. The farming States selected are Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa. Kansas and Nebraska. The manu- facturing States are Vermont, Massachusetts. Rhode Island. Con- necticut. New York. New Jersey. Pennsylvania and Maryland. The following table shows the prices in seven different products in December. 1889: I ARMIXd STA IKS. Per Bushel Corn 24 cents Wheat 66 cents Rye 34 cents Oats 18 cents Barley 38. 5 cents Iri.sh potatoes 25.5 cents Hay $5-30 Pt.-r bale MANUKACTIKIN*; STATES. Per Bushel Per Cent. More. 51 cents 1 1 2.6 91 cents 38 60 cents 76 35 cents 94 60 cents 54 5S cents 121 $11. 24 per bale m The average seUing price of these products is eighty-three per cent, more in manufacturing States than in agricultural States. This being the case, how is it possible that tariff reduction and consequent decrease of prosperity will not be felt in manufacturing^ States ? The fact is, the extension of manufactures has been of ines- timable benefit to the agricultural States. It furnishes beyoiid (lues- tion a market right here at home forsurplus i)roducts instead ot com- pellingthe farmer to pay cost of transportation to distant population. Take the statistics of public debt, National, State and local debt, and note the steady and wonderful j)er capita decrease in the last twenty years and tell me if this indicates diminishing i)rosi)erity. Look into the motive of the pri\ate indebtedness of the great West, and tell me if the fact that ninety to ninety-five per cent, has been incurred for purchase money and improvement shows decay or progress. WllAI II MI(U\^ IN NI'.W I'lI'.I.DS. I'Or iiislaiuc. let us compare the cuiulition of two leading- counties in Alabama in 1890 with their condition in 1880. Both were then a.u^ricultural, now one is anjiicultural and the other largely a manufacturing county: Per Cent. Jefferson county, purchase money, etc 95-84 Green countv, purchase money, etc 68.31 population of [efferson county in iSSo, 23,272; in 1890, 88,- 370. Incre;ise 2S0 per cent. The increase of Jefferson county, industrially, is illustrated by the coal and iron output of the .South- ern .States. These States produced in 1870, 184,540 tons of pig iron; in iSSo, 350,436 tons; in 1S90, 1,780,909 tons. The in- crea.se in the mining of coal in Alabama was from 350,000 tons in 1880 to about 3,500,000 tons in 1S90. No-ci' let lis look at Green county: 82.83 per cent. ])opulation is black. Increase in ten years, 61 persons. Debt $7 to one of pc^pul.ition. Here the cause is plainly misfortune, grocery bills, and the low prices on farm products. Cireen county has no manufactories, no good home market, nor otlur local acKantages of our magnificent protective tariff s\stem. Traverse the New .South, or the splendid expanding West, and where y(ni find the greatest amovmt of debt there too are the spots of greatest inchistrial and agricultural tlevelopment. Where you find stagnation, a stationary |)oi)ulati(>ii, no enterprise, no hope, there you will \\m\ small but more buixlensome debts because the motixe was grcjcerv bills and farm sujjplies and not purchase mone\- and impro\ iinents. ni;i;i> n noi. .Studv, I say, (-(litors of()liio, all these ficts, and rcfuti- the false charge that in the midst of plenty, of progress unecpialled, of enterprise, of a constantly widening and broadening home market, the .American farmer is being pushed to the wall. It is the voice of the demagogue, heed it not. Contrast the condition of manufacturing, of farming, of all occupatit)ns and of all profe.ss- ;ons that exist in Europe, with those of our own jirosperous land, and then ask tlie people of the United States if such a picture is teniptinii enough to induce them to ahand(Mi the present fiscal system and try "industrial freedom." as the post election spell- binder of the Democratic party terms free trade. Inject a little old fashioned vigor into your editorials. It is false, wickedly false, to sav that the tariff is purely for the benefit of American nianufactiu'ers. uiii:n w i: w ii.i. hank ihi'.ik i'ricks. (live to our great American manufacturers European rates of wages, and European armies and guns to keep the starving work- men in subjection, and European almshouses for the wage-earners to spend their declining days in. and they will produce you goods cheap enough for the wildest free trader. In those countries women as well as men toil, for man's earnings alone are insuffi- cient to keep body and soul together. My heart rejoices to find so many ladies present here to-night. It is good that they should feel an interest and take a part in mat- ters that affect them so vitally. And this fact prompts me to say a few words from my heart about the toiling women of Europe. About a competition that we must certainly meet when the doc- trine of cheapness and degradation to laix)r wins the final political victory. When our American mothers, and wi\es, and sisters, and women folk generally, have to labor as the toiling, suffering mul- titudes labor on the other side of the Atlantic, then and not until then, gentlemen of the Ohio Republican League, can we dig our minerals, shape our iron, fashion our i-)()ttery, spin our yarn, weave our cloth, make our garments, build our houses and pro- duce our commodities as cheaply, yea. even mork che.api.v, than tlu- nations of Euro[)e. rill'. MOM I'. OI" CIII-.Al'NKSS. I have traveled all through the industrial regions of Europe and have seen with my own eyes this pinching want among the industrial classes. I ha\e seen women bare-footed in ilu- l)rick yards of Merrie England, carrying cold slabs of damp clay. I have seen them filling the coke ovens of .Sunny Erance. I have seen them emerge from the coal pits of busy Hi'lgium. 1 have looked i>n in jjity aiul amazement at women bearing the brunt of the heat ami toil in the harvest fields of the German Fatherland. I have watched with sorrow and indignation women hitched u|) in Austria- Hungary with dogs dragging trucks and hauling- burdens. Sunburnt and bent, with ropes over their shoulders, I have seen women trudging along the banks of the canals and dykes of picturesque Hollaiul. dragging boats along the turgid waters. And, as if to cap the clima.x of cheapness and degrada- tion, I have seen women, dressed as men, mixing mortar, and carrying bricks up the scaffolding to the bricklayers, in the charm- ing city (»f .Stockholm, .Sweden. Having seen all this, knowing all this, I ask if any one can seriously consider this state of things and yet repose in absolute satisfaction antl confidence, as some of our statesmen do, in the doctrine of cheapness? Who suffers from this cheapness? "Wliy. Ilfsh iiiiil l)liM)(l. as a matter uf course! Yuii may talk of iron ami prate of force. Hut. after all. ami ilo what you ean, The he.st ami eheapest machine is man- Wealth knows it well, and the hucksters feel 'Tis safer to trust to sinew than steel. With a hit of brain, and a conscience behind. Muscle works better than steam or wind. Better, and loiurer, and harder, all round; And ciieaii. so ciieapl" The l)i-mocratic ]xirty was once in fa\or of cheap men and women. It has now changed its doctrine to cheap goods, which, as I ha\e .shown, pnictically means the same thing. riii-. I'Koi'osi:!) iNDisiKiAi. si.avi:rv. It is .said that Li.ncol.n, whose memory we Republicans cherish and whose birlhdav has been so appropriately celebrated to-day, .saw for the first time at New Orleans, in 1831, negroes chained and whijjped and scourged, and that his heart bled. It was see- ing this that formed his opinion of slavery. It ran its iron into him. And so it would ha\e been had he livetl to take part in this new struggle against a slavery which if carried to its natural result means an industrial slavery, second i)ii1\- to that other slavery which the glorious partv of .\i!W All. \\i I.im oi.N swept off the face of this continent. iHK IU)^VI•:K^ pakkoi. . Turning- for a moment from the more serious aspect of the tariff discussion, may I be pardoned for suggesting anotlier efiect- ive method of bringing the every da\' workings of protection to the minds of those who take things on [hv wing, and are often led astray by the catch-words of the cncni\-. l-'or example that well worn phrase of the enemy ' ' T/ic tariff is a tax. ' ' We completely knocked the under-pinning from it by the "Bowery Parrot," a mythical bird, by the way, that figured cons]Mcuously in New York in iSS8 antl did nuich to ehuidate the tariff cjucstion. I have been requested by my young friend Mr. Joseph Smith, not the Mormon, but Joseph V. Smith, editor of the Citizkx, of Urbana, to recite an ode to that glorious bird. Mr. .Smiih has lately been collecting the favorite jjoems of a number of people in different parts of the country, and among others I notice he puts down Hon. Ch.\rles A. Dana, editor of the New York Sun, with a preference for that inunortal and poetic expression of o])timistic philosophy, '"We may be happy yet You bet." And so we mav all be, after we ha\e elected another Repub- lican Governor in Ohio (nodding towards McKin'i.kv) and now I want to give you my fa\^orite poem : Somewhere along the Bowery, in weather elear or showery, A parrot perehes daily, near the elevated traeks, And whatever may be said to him, or read to him, or sung to him. He has notiiing else to say except, "The tarilfis a ta.x." You may tell him that the duty is a thing of joy and beauty. That it stimulates production, takes account of all the facts; When you make a thing it's cheaper, when you l)uy abroad it's steeper. But the parrot answers nothing save, "The taritris a tax." You mav show him by what stages large production makes good wages. Brings the buyer side by side with him who makes tlie thing he lacks. Saving cost of transportation fnmi a distant population, But the parrot heeds it not and .says, "The tarilV is a ta.\." You may show him that the farmer is happier and calmer. When he sells hisstufl at home, than wlien for distar.t points he packs That a factory iiiring labor is a profitable neighbor. But the parrot once more answers, "The tarill'is a ta.\." Thus the bird goes on repeating, this invariable greeting, A catch-word from the speeches of old Democratic hack^^^. And the triumph of protection by Ben Harrison's eh'ction, Ha.s not convinced the parrot tluit "Tlic tari,(rs >i<>i d i<(.< ;• Tlu- IJdWtrv I'.in-ot (lid cftectivc work. Im-oiii the day of his first appearance to the dose of the campaitjn all sorts and condi- tions of nu-n and women i)assed before him in jMCturesque proces- sion. In this way the tariff was Ijrcju.^ht home to the people. It enabled us to show the steady decline in prices of every article of j,'eneral consumption under a protective tariff. It oavean oppor- tunity to expose that fallacy <>i the free traders that the duty is added to the cost of an article. iii".ri'i:K cooDs AND chi:.\i'!:k iha.n kver. It convincetl the farmer that while his land and products had l)ecn increased in value by the nei.i,diboring mills and shops, he was buyinjj: better articles in the home market for less money than ever before. In short this lucky hit set the thoughdess thinking, bntught the most effective catch-words of the enemy into ridicule, and popularized tariff discussion. The opportunity has now- ar- rived for the Republican press of the country to discomfit the enemy in every direction on the question of prices. Advertise- ments should be scanned, price lists compared, and the cost of everything affected by the tariff watched closely, for the purpose of making tariff pictures, diagrams, and brief talks, exposing falsehoods, and refuting the idea that the tariff is a tax. I1I1-. c;i.ll{NKSS OF MKRl-: rilKORISTS. The ingenuilv of the free traders is great. Their leaders recognize more keenly than our leaders the power of the press. ( )ur o|)ponents are ever awake to utilize this great power for good or evil. Their cant |)hrases, shallow arguments, ancient a.xioms, trim little maxims antl trite little theories are constantly going the rounds of the opposition j)ress, apparently unchallanged by those wlio believe in the American system. There is apparently a great lack of bright paragraph work on the protection side of the tariff (|uestion. If it be true that the number of readers to each article increases by geometrical progression inversely to its length, a printed paragraph often lines would have thousands of readers, while a cohunn editorial would onl\- numlier them bv hundreds.. riiK i!i:sr Ti'.xi-iiooK. Now is the time to sow the seed of aj^gressive popular news- paperwork on this and the other questions of the day, if we expect a satisfactory harvest in 1892. The benefits of j^rotection should be brought to the uiiderstandinj^ and the hearts of the masses of our countrymen in the plain, direct, earnest, trenchant manner employed by that great protection editor, Horack (}reelp:y. There is no better text-book for Rejiublican editors just now than (iREEl.Ev's "Essays on Political Economy." They elucidate the science of political economy and explain and defend the [)()licy of Protection to Home Industiy. They are simple and concise. Sup])lemented by the data attainable to-day, they form an armor with which we may welcome the conflict and feel entirelv assured as to the ultimate issue. Bull Runs and Chickamaugas may in- tervene, but we may look beyond them to our Atlanta and Ap- pomattox. THE PEATI-ORM <)I" I.I XCULX. As the master hand of Horace Greeley, the editor, shaped the economic policies of the great party he helped to found, so the great statesman whose memory we all love and revere, Abraham LiNXLOX, almost a generation before he was called upon to lead that party, enunciated his belief in protection. 'T am in fevor, " he said, in March, 1832, "of a National Bank" — that meant hon- est currency — "I am in favor of the Internal Improvement Sys- tem" — that meant the development of the mighty West — and "of a High Protecti\e Tariff" — that meant the protection of American homes and decent wages for those who toil. And if alive to-day would he not have added: "I am in fa\or of a Eree Ballot and Honest Count at all elections, because the civil com- pact (jf a United Nation must rest now and for all time upon ma- jority rule." And would he not also ha\'e gi\en his sui)port to the measures now before Congress to extend the same ])rotection accorded American manufactures to our merchant marine? Ami lastly, my friends, would he not ha\e heartily favored a simple and business like method of extending our markets into foreign countries without impoverishing our own, such as that suggested by President Harrison, adopted by Major McKini.ev as part ot his bill, and put into execution uitliin tour months alter the passage of that bill by Jamks ( i. Ri.AiNK, a measure, by the way, that be- longs exclusively to this administration, and which will be put into i)ractical operation before the 4th of March, 1893. I'AUr Ol' IIS IIISKJRV. Splendid sentiments these for Re]niblicans to-day! Both these types of American manhood, Lixcoi.X and Grkkley, states- man and editor, were cU'\eIf)i)ed into their magnificent propor- tions l)y advocating the fundamental ideas of the Republican j)arty as we believe in them now. And shall we not remember the name of Lincoln as long as the memories of the triumphs of that party over slavery are remembered ? As long as the good accomplished by the war remains with us, and as long as we have manhood enough to stand up and fight for the results of those triumphs? Aye, even longer than that! As long as the sense of patriotism and the love of a United Republic remain with us. With grateful admiring affection we read to our children the story of his lifi- as given us in the ten volumes of those truly American historians, Nicolav and HAV,and they become strength- ened in the lo\e of all that is best and truest and noblest and most inspiring in American history. No matter what the future trials and reverses may be, the ])arty that espoused slavery cannot rob the Republican party of ihr brilliant galaxy of patriots, soldiers, and statesmen who rallied us to successful contests against the agencies of corruption, of ruin, and of the slavery of human beings. When victory again crowns our eftbrts, as I believe it will in iSy2, those magnificent names that inspire us in defeat will share the tnum])h of the ])arty they loved and served so well and so faithfully. One by one their familiar faces and figures have disappeared. A sorrowing country weeps to day at the bedside f)f one of its strongest and greatest and most patriotic, that grand okl ()hif)an, General William T. .Shkrman! But their names and their deeds, thank God, arc jxut of the possessions of the Re- publican part)-. LIBRORV OF CONGRESS 013 788 095 7 ^ ABIJAnAM LINCOLH. llow liiiiiil)li', yet lntw linpt'liil lifionlil lie ili)w ii) ijoiiil fortune anl«l. nur fcvi-risli for fanu-. ■r ''■••' •-/ A LiBRARV OF CONGRESS 013 788 095 7 Hollinger pH8.5 Mill Run F3-1955