& v

% o ^ '<, * , s ^ -X -s- ^ -C- V ^^ ■*». a5 'A I* •*o °* ■^ ', > < • \ x ^ y v? -^ -\\ \ \° ©., >- \ FAMOUS AMERICANS v OF RECENT TIMES. BY JAMES PARTON, ADTHOR OF "LIFE OF ANDREW J.. CSON," "LIFE AND TIMES OF AARON BURR,'' " LIFE AND TIMES OF BENJAMIN FRANKLIN," ETC ' \ ! ill. 1 i m \ BOSTON: TICKNOR AND FIELDS 1867. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by TICKNOR AND FIELDS, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts. University Press: Welch, Bigelow, & Co., Cambridge. CONTENTS. Page IIenry Clay 1 Daniel Webster 53 John C. Calhoun 113 John Randolph If3 Stephen Girard and his College . . . .221 James Gordon- Bennett .\nd the New York Herald 259 Charles Goodyear ....... 307 Henry Ward Beecher and his Church . . . 347 Commodore Vanderbilt 373 Theodosia Burr 391 John Jacob Astor ....... 427 NOTE. The papers contained in this volume were originally pub- lished in the North American Review, with four exceptions. Those upon Theodosia Burr and John Jacob Astor first appeared in Harper's Magazine ; that upon Commodore Van- derbilt, in the Neiv York Ledger ; and that upon Henry Ward Beecher and his Church, in the Atlantic Monthly. HENRY CLAY. HENRY CLAY. THE close of the war removes the period preceding it to a great distance from us, so that we can judge its public men as though we were the " posterity " to whom they sometimes ap- pealed. James Buchanan still haunts the neighborhood of Lan- caster, a living man, giving and receiving dinners, paying his taxes, and taking his accustomed exercise ; but as an historical figure he is as complete as Bolingbroke or Walpole. It is not merely that his work is done, nor that the results of his work are apparent ; but the thing upon which he wrought, by their relation to which he and his contemporaries are to be estimated, has perished. The statesmen of his day, we can all now plainly see, inherited from the founders of the Republic a problem im- possible of solution, with which some of them wrestled manfully, others meanly, some wisely, others foolishly. If the workmen have not all passed away, the work is at once finished and de- stroyed, like the llussian ice-palace, laboriously built, then melted in the sun. We can now have the requisite sympathy with those late doctors of the body politic, who came to the consul- tation pledged not to attempt to remove the thorn from its flesh, and trained to regard it as the spear-head in the side of Epami- nondas, — extract it, and the patient dies. In the writhings of the sufferer the barb has fallen out, and lo ! he lives and is get- timr well. We can now formve most of those blind healers, and even admire such of them as were honest and not cowards ; for, in truth, it was an impossibility with which they had to grapple, and it was not one of their creating. Of our public men of the sixty years preceding the war, Henry Clay was certainly the most shining figure. Was there ever a 4 HENRY CLAY. public man, not at the head of a state, so beloved as he ? Who ever heard such cheers, so hearty, distinct, and ringing, as those which his name evoked ? Men shed tears at his defeat, and women went to bed sick from pure sympathy with his disap- pointment. He could not travel during the last thirty years of his life, but only make progresses. When he left bis home the public seized him and bore him along over the land, the commit- tee of one State passing him on to the committee of another, and the hurrahs of one town dying away as those of the next caught his ear. The country seemed to place all its resources at his disposal ; all commodities sought his acceptance. Passing through Newark once, he thoughtlessly ordered a carriage of a certain pattern : the same evening the carriage was at the door of his hotel in New York, the gift of a few Newark friends. It was so everywhere and with everything. His house became at last a museum of curious gifts. There was the counterpane made for him by a lady ninety-three years of age, and Washington's camp- goblet given him by a lady of eighty ; there were pistols, rifles, and fowling-pieces enough to defend a citadel; and, among a bun- dle of walking-sticks, was one cut for him from a tree that shaded Cicero's grave. There were gorgeous prayer-books, and Bibles of exceeding magnitude and splendor, and silver-ware in great profusion. On one occasion there arrived at Ashland the sub- stantial present of twenty-three barrels of salt. In his old age, when his fine estate, through the misfortunes of his sons, was burdened with mortgages to the amount of thirty thousand dol- lars, and other large debts weighed heavily upon his soul, and he feared to be compelled to sell the home of fifty years and seek a strange abode, a few old friends secretly raised the needful sum, secretly paid the mortgages and discharged the debts, and then caused the aged orator to be informed of what had been done, but not of the names of the donors. " Could my life insure the success of Henry Clay, I would freely lay it down this day," exclaimed an old Rhode Island sea-captain on the morning of the Presidential election of 1844. Who has forgotten the passion of disappointment, the amazement and despair, at the result of that day's fatal work ? Fatal we thought it then, little dreaming HENBY CLAY. 5 that, while it precipitated evil, it brought nearer the day of deliverance. Our readers do not need to be reminded that popularity the most intense is not a proof of merit. The two most mischievous men this country has ever produced were extremely popular, — one in a State, the other in every State, — and both for long periods of time. There are certain men and women and children who are natural heart-winners, and their gift of winning hearts seems something apart from their general character. We have known this sweet power over the affections of others to be pos- sessed by very worthy and by very barren natures. There are good men who repel, and bad men who attract. We cannot, therefore, assent to the opinion held by many, that popularity is an evidence of shallowness or ill-desert. As there are pictures expressly designed to be looked at from a distance by great num- bers of people at once, — the scenery of a theatre, for example, — so there are men who appear formed by Nature to stand forth before multitudes, captivating every eye, and gathering in great harvests of love with little effort. If, upon looking closely at these pictures and these men, we find them less admirable than they seemed at a distance, it is but fair to remember that they were not meant to be looked at closely, and that " scenery " has as much right to exist as a Dutch painting which bears the test of the microscope. It must be confessed, however, that Henry Clay, who was for twenty-eight years a candidate for the Presidency, cultivated his popularity. Without ever being a hypocrite, he was habitually an actor ; but the part which he enacted was Henry Clay exag- gerated. He was naturally a most courteous man ; but the con- sciousness of his position made him more elaborately and univer- sally courteous than any man ever was from mere good-nature. A man on the stage must overdo his part, in order not to seem to underdo it. There was a time when almost every visitor to the city of Washington desired, above all things, to be presented to three men there, Clay, Webster, and Calhoun, whom to have seen was a distinction. When the country member brought for- ward his agitated constituent on the floor of the Senate-chamber, 6 HENRY CLAY. and introduced him to Daniel "Webster, the Expounder was likely enough to thrust a hand at him without so much as turning his head or discontinuing his occupation, and the stranger shrunk away painfully conscious of his insignificance. Calhoun, on the contrary, besides receiving him with civility, would converse with him, if opportunity favored, and treat him to a disquisition on the nature of government and the "beauty " of nullification, striv- ing to make a lasting impression on his intellect. Clay would rise, extend his hand with that winning grace of his, and in- stantly captivate him by his all-conquering courtesy. He would call him by name, inquire respecting his health, the town whence he came, how long he had been in Washington, and send him away pleased with himself and enchanted with Henry Clay. And what was his delight to receive a few weeks after, in his distant village, a copy of the Kentuckian's last speech, bearing on the cover the frank of " H. Clay " ! It was almost enough to make a man think of " running for Congress " ! And, what was still more intoxicating, Mr. Clay, who had a surprising memory, would be likely, on meeting this individual two years after the introduction, to address him by name. There was a gamy flavor, in those days, about Southern men, which was very pleasing to the people of the North. Reason teaches us that the barn-yard fowl is a more meritorious bird than the game-cock ; but the imagination does not assent to the proposition. Clay was at once game-cock and domestic fowl. His gestures called to mind the magnificently branching trees of his Kentucky forests, and his handwriting had the neatness and delicacy of a female copyist. There was a careless, graceful ease in his movements and attitudes, like those of an Indian chief; but he was an exact man of business, who docketed his letters, and could send from AVashington to Ashland for a document, tell- ing in what pigeon-hole it could be found. Naturally impetuous, he acquired early in life an habitual moderation of statement, an habitual consideration for other men's self-love, which made him the pacificator of his time. The great compromiser was himself a compromise. The ideal of education is to tame men without lessening then- vivacity, — to unite in them the freedom, the dig- HENRY CLAY. 7 nity, the prowess of a Tecumseh, with the serviceable qualities of the civilized man. This happy union is said to be sometimes produced in the pupils of the great public schools of England, who are savages on the play-ground and gentlemen in the school- room. In no man of our knowledge has there been combined so much of the best of the forest chief with so much of the good of the trained man of business as in Henry Clay. This was one secret of his power over classes of men so diverse as the hunters of Kentucky and the manufacturers of New England. It used to be accounted a merit in a man to rise to high station from humble beginnings ; but we now perceive that humble beginnings are favorable to the development of that force of character which wins the world's great prizes. Let us never again commend any one for "rising" from obscurity to eminence, but reserve our special homage for those who have become respectable human beings in spite of having had every advantage procured for them by rich fathers. Henry Clay found an Eton and an Oxford in Old Virginia that were better for him than those of Old England. Few men have been more truly fortu- nate in their education than he. It was said of a certain lady, that to know her was a liberal education ; and there really have been, and are, women of whom that could be truly averred. But perhaps the greatest good fortune that can befall an intelligent and noble-minded youth is to come into intimate, confidential relations with a wise, learned, and good old man, one who has been greatly trusted and found worthy of trust, who knows the world by having long taken a leading part in its affairs, and has outlived illusions only to get a firmer footing in realities. This, indeed, is a liberal education ; and this was the happiness of Henry Clay. Nothing in biography is so strange as the cer- tainty with which a superior youth, in the most improbable cir- cumstances, finds the mental nourishment he needs. Here, in the swampy region of Hanover County, Virginia, was a bare- footed, ungainly urchin, a poor widow's son, without one influ- ential relative on earth ; and there, in Richmond, sat on the chancellor's bench George Wythe, venerable with years and honors, one of the grand old men of Old Virginia, the preceptor 8 HENRY CLAY. of Jefferson, signer of the Declaration of Independence, the most learned man in his profession, and one of the best men of any profession. Who could have foreseen that this friendless orphan, a Baptist preacher's son, in a State where to be a " dissenter " was social inferiority, should have found in this eminent judge a friend, a mentor, a patron, a father ? Yet it came about in the most natural way. "We catch our first glimpse of the boy when he sat in a little log school-house, without windows or floor, one of a humming score of shoeless boys, where a good-natured, irritable, drinking English school- master taught him to read, write, and cipher as far as Practice. This was the only school he ever attended, and that was all he learned at it. His widowed mother, with her seven young chil- dren, her little farm, and two or three slaves, could do no more for him. Next, we see him a tall, awkward, slender stripling of thirteen, still barefoot, clad in homespun butternut of his mother's making, tilling her fields, and going to mill with his bag of corn strapped upon the family pony. At fourteen, in the year 1791, a place was found for him in a Richmond drug-store, where he served as errand-boy and youngest clerk for one year. Then occurred the event which decided his career. His mother having married again, her husband had influence enough to procure for the lad the place of copying clerk in the office of the Court of Chancery. The young gentlemen then employed in the office of that court long remembered the entrance among them of their new comrade. He was fifteen at the time, but very tall for his age, very slender, very awkward, and far from hand- some. His good mother had arrayed him in a full suit of pepper- and-salt " figginy," an old Virginia fabric of silk and cotton. His shirt and shirt-collar were stiffly starched, and his coat-tail stood out boldly behind him. The dandy law clerks of metropolitan Richmond exchanged glances as this gawky figure entered, and took his place at a desk to begin his work. There was some- thing in his manner which prevented their indulgence in the jests that usually greet the arrival of a country youth among city blades ; and they afterwards congratulated one another that they had waited a little before beginning to tease him, for they soon HENRY CLAY. 9 found that he had brought with him from the country an exceed- ingly sharp tongue. Of his first service little is known, except the immense fact that he was a most diligent reader. It rests on better authority than " Campaign Lives," that, while his fellow- clerks went abroad in the evening in search of pleasure, this lad stayed at home with his books. It is a pleasure also to know that he had not a taste for the low vices. lie came of sound English stock, of a family who would not have regarded drunk- enness aud debauchery as " sowing wild oats," but recoiled from the thought of them with horror. Clay was far from being a saint ; but it is our privilege to believe of him that he was a clean, temperate, and studious young man. Richmond, the town of the young Republic that had most in it of the metropolitan, proved to this aspiring youth as true a Uni- versity as the printing-office in old Boston was to Benjamin Franklin ; for he found in it the culture best suited to him and his circumstances. Chancellor Wythe, then sixty-seven years of age, overflowing with knowledge and good nature, was the presi- dent of that university. Its professors were the cluster of able men who had gone along with Washington and Jefferson in the measures which resulted in the independence of the country. Patrick Henry was there to teach him the arts of oratory. There was a flourishing and famous debating society, the pride of the young men of Richmond, in which to try his half-fledged powers. The impulse given to thought by the American Revo- lution was quickened and prolonged by the thrilling news which every vessel brought from France of the revolution there. There was an atmosphere in Virginia favorable to the growth of a sympathetic mind. Young Clay's excellent handwriting brought him gradually into the most affectionate relations with Chancellor Wythe, whose aged hand trembled to such a degree that he was glad to borrow a copyist from the clerk's office. For nearly four years it was the young man's principal duty to copy the decisions of the venerable Chancellor, which were curiously learned and elaborate ; for it was the bent of the Chancellor's mind to trace the law to its sources in the ancient world, and fortify his posi- tions by citations from Greek and Latin authors. The Greek 1* 10 HENRY CLAY. passages were a plague to the copyist, who knew not the alphabet of that language, but copied it, so to speak, by rote. Here we have another proof that, no matter what a man's op- portunities are, he only learns what is congenial with his nature and circumstances. Living under the influence of this learned judge, Henry Clay might have become a man of learning. George Wythe was a " scholar " in the ancient acceptation of the word. The whole education of his youth consisted in his acquir- ing the Latin language, which his mother taught him. Early inheriting a considerable fortune, he squandered it in dissipation, and sat down at thirty, a reformed man, to the study of the law. To his youthful Latin he now added Greek, which he studied assiduously for many years, becoming, probably, the best Greek scholar in Virginia. His mind would have wholly lived in the ancient world, and been exclusively nourished from the ancient literatures, but for the necessities of his profession and the stir- ring political events of his later life. The Stamp Act and the Revolution varied and completed his education. His young copyist was not attracted by him to the study of Greek and Latin, nor did he catch from him the habit of probing a subject to the bottom, and ascending from the questions of the moment to universal principles. Henry Clay probed nothing to the bot- tom, except,' perhaps, the game of whist; and though his instincts and tendencies were high and noble, he had no grasp of general truths. Under Wythe, he became a stanch Republican of the Jeffersonian school. Under Wythe, who emancipated his slaves before his death, and set apart a portion of his estate for their maintenance, he acquired a repugnance to slavery which he never lost. The Chancellor's learning and philosophy were not for him, and so he passed them by. The tranquil wisdom of the judge was counteracted, in some degree, by the excitements of the debating society. As he grew older, the raw and awkward stripling became a young man whose every movement had a winning or a commanding grace. Hand- some he never was ; but his ruddy face and abundant light hair, the grandeur of his forehead and the speaking intelligence of his countenance, more than atoned for the irregularity of his features. HENRY CLAY. 11 His face, too, was a compromise. With all its vivacity of ex- pression, there was always something that spoke of the -Baptist preacher's son, — just as Andrew Jackson's face had the set ex- pression of a Presbyterian elder. But of all the bodily gifts bestowed by Nature upon this favored child, the most unique and admirable was his voice. Who ever heard one more melodious ? There was a depth of tone in it, a volume, a compass, a rich and tender harmony, which invested all he said with majesty. We heard it last when he was an old man past seventy ; and all he said was a few w 7 ords of acknowledgment to a group of ladies in the largest hall in Philadelphia. He spoke only in the ordinary tone of conversation ; but his voice filled the room as the organ fills a great cathedral, and the ladies stood spellbound as the swelling cadences rolled about the vast apartment. We have heard much of Whitefield's piercing voice and Patrick Henry's silvery tones, but we cannot believe that either of those natural orators possessed an organ superior to Clay's majestic bass. No one who ever heard him speak will find it difficult to believe what tradition reports, that he was the peerless star of the Rich- mond Debating Society in 1795. Oratory was then in the highest vogue. Young Virginians did not need to look beyond the sea in order to learn that the orator was the man most in request in the dawn of freedom. Chatham, Burke, Fox, Sheridan, and Pitt were inconceivably imposing names at that day ; but was not Patrick Henry the foremost man in Virginia, only because he could speak and en- tertain an audience ? And what made John Adams President but his fiery utterances in favor of the Declaration of Indepen- dence? There were other speakers then in Virginia who would have had to this day a world-wide fame if they had spoken where the world could hear them. The tendency now is to undervalue oratory, and we regret it. We believe that, in a free country, every citizen should be able to stand undaunted before his fellow- citizens, and give an account of the faith that is in him. It is no argument against oratory to point to the Disraelis of both coun- tries, and say that a gift possessed by such men cannot be a val- uable one. It is the unmanly timidity and shamefacedness of 12 HENRY CLAY. the rest of us that give to such men their preposterous impor- tance. It were a calamity to America if, in the present rage for ball-playing and boat-rowing, which we heartily rejoice in, the debating society should be forgotten. Let us rather end the sway of oratory by all becoming orators. Most men who can talk well seated in a chair can learn to talk well standing on their legs ; and a man who can move or instruct five persons in a small room can learn to move or instruct two thousand in a large one. t That Henry Clay cultivated his oratorical talent in Rich- mond, we have his own explicit testimony. He told a class of law students once that he owed his success in life to a habit early formed, and for some years continued, of reading daily in a book of history or science, and declaiming the substance of what he had read in some solitary place, — a cornfield, the forest, a barn, with only oxen and horses for auditors. " It is," said he, " to this early practice of the art of all arts that I am indebted for the primary and leading impulses that stimulated my progress, and have shaped and moulded my entire destiny." "We should be glad to know more of this self-training; but Mr. Clay's "cam- paign " biographers have stuffed their volumes too full of eulogy to leave room for such instructive details. We do not even know the books from which he declaimed. Plutarch's Lives were fa- vorite reading with him, we accidentally learn ; and his speeches contain evidence that he was powerfully influenced by the writ- ings of Dr. Franklin. We believe it was from Franklin that he learned very much of the art of managing men. Franklin, we think, aided this impetuous and exaggerating spirit to acquire his habitual moderation of statement, and that sleepless courtesy which, in his keenest encounters, generally kept him within par- liamentary bounds, and enabled him to live pleasantly with men from whom he differed in opinion. Obsolete as many of his speeches are, from the transient nature of the topics of which they treat, they may still be studied with profit by young orators and old politicians as examples of parliamentary politeness. It was the good-natured and wise Franklin that helped him to this. It is certain, too, that at some part of his earlier life he read HENBY CLAY. 13 translations of Demosthenes ; for of all modern orators Henry Clay was the most Demosthenian. Calhoun purposely and con- sciously imitated the Athenian orator; but Clay was a kindred spirit with Demosthenes. "We could select passages from both these orators, and no man could tell which was American and which was Greek, unless he chanced to remember the passage. Tell us, gentle reader, were the sentences following spoken by Henry Clay after the war of 1812 at the Federalists who had opposed that war, or by Demosthenes against the degenerate Greeks who favored the designs of Philip? " From first to last I have uniformly pursued the just and virtuous course, — asserter of the honors, of the prerogatives, of the glory of my country. Studious to support them, zealous to advance them, my whole being is devoted to this glorious cause. I was never known to walk abroad with a face of joy and exulta- tion at the success of the enemy, embracing and announcing the joyous tidings to those who I supposed would transmit it to the proper place. I was never known to receive the successes of my own country with trembling, with sighs, with my eyes bent to the earth, like those impious men who are the defamers of their country, as if by such conduct they were not defamers of themselves." Is it Clay, or is it Demosthenes? Or have we made a mis- take, and copied a passage from the speech of a Unionist of 18G5? After serving four years as clerk and amanuensis, barely earn- ing a subsistence, Clay was advised by his venerable friend, the Chancellor, to study law ; and a place was procured for him in the office of the Attorney-General of the State. In less than a year after formally beginning his studies he was admitted to the bar. This seems a short preparation ; but the whole period of his connection with Chancellor Wythe was a study of the law. The Chancellor was what a certain other chancellor styles " a full man," and Henry Clay was a receptive youth. When he had obtained his license to practise he was twenty years of age. Debating-society fame and drawing-room popular- ity do not, in an old commonwealth like Virginia, bring practice 14 HENRY CLAY. to a lawyer of twenty. But, as a distinguished French author has recently remarked of Julius Caesar, " In him was united the elegance of manner which wins, to the energy of character which commands." He sought, therefore, a new sphere of exertion far from the refinements of Richmond. Kentucky, which Boone explored in 1770, was a part of Virginia when Clay was a child, and only became a State in 1792, when first he began to copy Chancellor Wythe's decisions. The first white family settled in it in 1775 ; but when our young barrister obtained his license, twenty-two years after, it contained a white population of nearly two hundred thousand. His mother, with five of her children and a second husband, had gone thither five years before. In 1797 Henry Clay removed to Lexington, the new State's oldest town and capital, though then containing, it is said, but fifty houses. He was a stranger there, and almost penniless. He took board, not knowing where the money was to come from to pay for it. There were already several lawyers of repute in the place. "I remember," said Mr. Clay, forty-five years after, " how comfortable I thought I should be if I could make one hundred pounds a year, Virginia money ; and with what delight I received my first fifteen-shilling fee. My hopes were more than realized. I immediately rushed into a successful and lucra- tive practice." In a year and a half he was in a position to marry the daughter of one of the first men of the State, Colonel Thomas Hart, a man exceedingly beloved in Lexington. It is surprising how addicted to litigation were the early set- tlers of the Western States. The imperfect surveys of land, the universal habit of getting goods on credit at the store, and " difficulties " between individuals ending in bloodshed, filled the court calendars with land disputes, suits for debt, and exciting murder cases, which gave to lawyers more importance and better chances of advancement than they possessed in the older States. Mr. Clay had two strings to his bow. Besides being a man of red tape and pigeon-holes, exact, methodical, and strictly attentive to business, he had a power over a Kentucky jury such as no other man has ever wielded. To this day nothing pleases aged Kentuckians better than to tell stories which they heard their HENRY CLAY. 15 fathers tell, of Clay's happy repartees to opposing counsel, his ingenious cross-questioning of witnesses, his sweeping torrents of invective, his captivating courtesy, his melting pathos. Single gestures, attitudes, tones, have come down to us through two or three memories, and still please the curious guest at Kentucky firesides. But when we turn to the cold records of this part of his life, we find little to justify his traditional celebrity. It ap- pears that the principal use to which his talents were applied during the first years of his practice at the bar was in defending murderers. He seems to have shared the feeling which then prevailed in the Western country, that to defend a prisoner at the bar is a nobler thing than to assist in defending the public against his further depredations ; and he threw all his force into the defence of some men who would have been " none the worse for a hanging." One day, in the streets of Lexington, a drunken fellow whom he had rescued from the murderer's doom cried out, " Here comes Mr. Clay, who saved my life." " Ah ! my poor fellow," replied the advocate, " I fear I have saved too many like you, who ought to be hanged." The anecdotes printed of his exploits in cheating the gallows of its due are of a quality which shows that the power of this man over a jury lay much in his manner. His delivery, which "bears absolute sway in oratory," was bewitching and irresistible, and gave to quite commonplace wit and very questionable sentiment an amazing power to please and subdue. We are far from thinking that he was not a very able lawyer. Judge Story, we remember, before whom he argued a cause later in life, was of opinion that he would have won a high position at the bar of the Supreme Court, if he had not been early drawn away to public life. In Kentucky he was a brilliant, successful practitioner, such as Kentucky wanted and could appreciate. In a very few years he was the possessor of a fine estate near Lex- ington, and to the single slave who came to him as his share of his father's property were added several others. His wife being a skilful and vigorous manager, he was in independent circum- stances, and ready to serve the public, if the public wished him, when he had been but ten years in his Western home. Thus he 16 HENRY CLAY. had a basis for a public career, without which few men can long serve the public with honor and success. And this was a prin- cipal reason of the former supremacy of Southern men in Wash- ington ; nearly all of them being men who owned land, which slaves tilled for them, whether they were present or absent. The young lawyer took to politics very naturally. Posterity, which will judge the public men of that period chiefly by their course with regard to slavery, will note with pleasure that Clay's first public act was an attempt to deliver the infant State of Kentucky from that curse. The State Constitution was to be remodelled in 1799. Fresh from the society of Chancellor Wythe, an abolitionist who had set free his own slaves, — fresh from Richmond, where every man of note, from Jefferson and Patrick Henry downwards, was an abolitionist, — Henry Clay began in 1798, being then twenty -one years of age, to write a series of articles for a newspaper, advocating the gradual aboli- tion of slavery in Kentucky. He afterwards spoke on that side at public meetings. Young as he was, he took the lead of the public-spirited young men who strove to purge the State from this iniquity ; but in the Convention the proposition was voted down by a majority so decisive as to banish the subject from poli- tics for fifty years. Still more honorable was it in Mr. Clay, that, in 1829, when Calhoun was maturing nullification, he could publicly say that among the acts of his life which he reflected upon with most satisfaction was his youthful effort to secure emancipation in Kentucky. The chapter of our history most abounding in all the elements of interest will be that one which will relate the rise and first national triumph of the Democratic party. Young Clay came to the Kentucky stump just when the country was at the crisis of the struggle between the Old and the New. But in Kentucky it was not a struggle ; for the people there, mostly of Virginian birth, had been personally benefited by Jefferson's equalizing measures, and were in the fullest sympathy with his political doctrines. When, therefore, this brilliant and commanding youth, with that magnificent voice of his, and large gesticulation, mount- ed the wagon that usually served as platform in the open-air HENRY CLAY. 17 meetings of Kentucky, and gave forth, in fervid oratory, the republican principles he had imbibed in Richmond, he won that immediate and intense popularity which an orator always wins who gives powerful expression to the sentiments of his hearers. We cannot wonder that, at the close of an impassioned address upon the Alien and Sedition Laws, the multitude should have pressed about him, and borne him aloft in triumph upon their shoulders ; nor that Kentucky should have hastened to employ him in her public business as soon as he was of the requisite age. At thirty he was, to use the language of the stump, " Kentucky's favorite son," and incomparably the finest orator in the Western country. Kentucky had tried him, and found him perfectly to her mind. He was an easy, comfortable man to associate with, wholly in the Jeffersonian taste. His wit was not of the highest quality, but he had plenty of it; and if he said a good thing, he had such a way of saying it as gave it ten times its natural force. He chewed tobacco and took snuff, — practices which lowered the tone of his health all his life. In familiar conversation he used language of the most Western description ; and he had a singularly careless, graceful way with him, that was in strong contrast with the vigor and dignity of his public efforts. He was an honest and brave young man, altogether above lying, hypoc- risy, and meanness, — full of the idea of Republican America and her great destiny. The splendor of his talents concealed his defects and glorified his foibles; and Kentucky rejoiced in him, loved him, trusted him, and sent him forth to represent her in the national council. During the first thirteen years of Henry Clay's active life as a politician, — from his twenty-first to his thirty-fourth year, — he appears in politics only as the eloquent champion of the policy of Mr. Jefferson, whom he esteemed the first and best of living- men. After defending him on the stump and aiding him in the Kentucky Legislature, he was sent in 1806, when he was scarcely thirty, to fill for one term a seat in the Senate of the United States, made vacant by the resignation of one of tho Kentucky Senators. Mr. Jefferson received his affectionate young disciple with cordiality, and admitted him to his confi- B 18 HENRY CLAY. dence. Clay had been recently defending Burr before a Ken- tucky court, entirely believing that his designs were lawful and sanctioned. Mr. Jefferson showed him the cipher letters of that mysterious and ill-starred adventurer, which convinced Mr. Clay that Burr was certainly a liar, if he was not a traitor. Mr. Jef- ferson's perplexity in 1806 was similar to that of Jackson in 1833, — too much money in the treasury. The revenue then was fifteen millions ; and, after paying all the expenses of the government and the stipulated portion of the national debt, there was an obstinate and most embarrassing surplus. What to do with this irrepressible surplus was the question then discussed in Mr. Jefferson's Cabinet. The President, being a free-trader, would naturally have said, Reduce the duties. But the younger men of the party, who had no pet theories, and particularly our young Senator, who had just come in from a six weeks' horse- back flounder over bridgeless roads, urged another solution of the difficulty, — Internal Improvements. But the President was a strict-constructionist, denied the authority of Congress to vote money for public works, and was fully committed to that opinion. Mr. Jefferson yielded. The most beautiful theories will not always endure the wear and tear of practice. The President, it is true, still maintained that an amendment to the Constitution ought to precede appropriations for public works ; but he said this very briefly and without emphasis, while he stated at some length, and with force, the desirableness of expending the surplus revenue in improving the country. As time wore on, less and less was said about the amendment, more and more about the im- portance of internal improvements ; until, at last, the Republican party, under Clay, Adams, Calhoun, and Rush, went as far in this business of road-making and canal-digging as Hamilton him- self could have desired. Thus it was that Jefferson rendered true his own saying, " We are all Federalists, we are all Repub- licans." Jefferson yielded, also, on the question of free-trade. There is a passage of a few lines in Mr. Jefferson's Message of 1806, the year of Henry Clay's first appearance in Washington, which may be regarded as the text of half the Kentuckian's HENRY CLAY. 19 speeches, and the inspiration of his public life. The President is discussing the question, What shall we do with the surplus ? " Shall we suppress the impost, and give that advantage to foreign over domestic manufactures ? On a few articles of more general and necessary use, the suppression, in due season, will doubtless be right ; but the great mass of the articles upon which impost is paid are foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance, and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, ca- nals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of Fed- eral powers. By these operations, new channels of communica- tion will be opened between the States, the lines of separation will disappear, their interests will be identified, and their union cemented by new and indissoluble bonds." Upon these hints, the young Senator delayed not to speak and act ; nor did he wait for an amendment to the Constitution. His first speech in the Senate was in favor of building a bridge over the Potomac ; one of his first acts, to propose an appropriation of lands for a canal round the Falls of the Ohio at Louisville ; and soon he brought forward a resolution directing the Secretary o>" the Treasury to report a system of roads and canals for the con- sideration of Congress. The seed of the President's Message had fallen into good ground. Returning home at the end of the session, and re-entering the Kentucky Legislature, we still find him a strict follower of Mr. Jefferson. In support of the President's non-intercourse policy (which was Franklin's policy of 1775 applied to the circum- stances of 1808), Mr. Clay proposed that the members of the Legislature should bind themselves to wear nothing that was not of American manufacture. A Federalist, ignorant of the illus- trious origin of this idea, ignorant that the homespun system had caused the repeal of the Stamp Act, and would have postponed the Revolution but for the accident of Lexington, denounced Mr. Clay's proposition as the act of a shameless demagogue. Clay challenged this ill-informed gentleman, and a duel resulted, in 20 HENRY CLAY. which two shots were exchanged, and both antagonists were slightly wounded. Elected again to the Senate for an unexpired term, he reappeared in that body in 1809, and sat during two sessions. Homespun was again the theme of his speeches. His ideas on the subject of protecting and encouraging American manufactures were not derived from books, nor expressed in the language of political economy. At his own Kentucky home, Mrs. Clay, assisted by her servants, was spinning and weaving, knitting and sewing, most of the garments required in her little kingdom of six hundred acres, while her husband was away over the mountains serving his country. " Let the nation do what we Kentucky farmers are doing," said Mr. Clay to the Senate. " Let us manufacture enough to be independent of foreign nations in things essential, — no more." He discoursed on this subject in a very pleasant, humorous manner, without referring to the abstract principle involved, or employing any of the technical language of economists. His service in the Senate during these two sessions enhanced his reputation greatly, and the galleries were filled when he was expected to speak, little known as he was to the nation at laro-e. We have a glimpse of him in one of Washington Irving's letters of February, 1811: "Clay, from Kentucky, spoke against the Bank. He is one of the finest fellows I have seen here, and one of the finest orators in the Senate, though I believe, the youngest man in it. The galleries, however, were so much crowded with ladies and gentlemen, and such expectations had been expressed concerning his speech, that he was completely frightened, and ac- quitted himself very little to his own satisfaction. He is a man I have great personal regard for." This was the anti-bank speech which General Jackson used to say had convinced him of the impolicy of a national bank, and which, with ingenious malice, he covertly quoted in making up his Bank Veto Message of 1832. Mr. Clay's public life proper began in November, 1811, when he appeared in Washington as a member of the House of Rep- resentatives, and was immediately elected Speaker by the war party, by the decisive majority of thirty-one. He was then thirty-four years of age. His election to the Speakership on his HENRY CLAY. 21 first appearance in the House gave him, at once, national stand- ing. His master in political doctrine and his partisan chief, Thomas Jefferson, was gone from the scene ; and Clay could now be a planet instead of a satellite. Restive as he had been under the arrogant aggressions of England, he had schooled himself to patient waiting, aided by Jefferson's benign sentiments and great example. But his voice was now for war ; and such was the temper of the public in those months, that the eloquence of Henry Clay, seconded by the power of the Speaker, rendered the war unavoidable. It is agreed that to Henry Clay, Speaker of the House of Representatives, more than to any other individual, we owe the war of 1812. When the House hesitated, it was he who, descending from the chair, spoke eo as to reassure it. When President Madison faltered, it was the stimulus of Clay's resistless presence that put heart into him again. If the people seemed reluctant, it was Clay's trumpet harangues that fired their minds. And when the war was declared, it was he, more than President or Cabinet or War Com- mittee, that carried it along upon his shoulders. All our wars begin in disaster; it was Clay who restored the country to con- fidence when it was disheartened by the loss of Detroit and its betrayed garrison. It was Clay alone who could encounter with- out flinching the acrid sarcasm of John Randolph, and exhibit the nothingness of his telling arguments. It was he alone who could adequately deal with Quincy of Massachusetts, who allud- ed to the Speaker and his friends as " young politicians, with their pin-feathers yet unshed, the shell still sticking upon them, — per- fectly unfledged, though they fluttered and cackled on the floor." Clay it was whose clarion notes rang out over departing regi- ments, and kindled within them the martial fire ; and it was Clay's speeches which the soldiers loved to read by the camp-fire. Fiery Jackson read them, and found them perfectly to his taste. Gentle Harrison read them to his Tippecanoe heroes. When the war was going all wrong in the first year, President Madison wished to appoint Clay Commander-in-Chief of the land forces ; but, said Gallatin, "What shall we do without him in the House of Representatives ? " 22 HENRY CLAY. Henry Clay was not a man of blood. On the contrary, lie was eminently pacific, both in his disposition and in his politics. Yet he believed in the war of 1812, and his whole heart was in it. The question occurs, then, Was it right and best for the United States to declare war against Great Britain in 1812? The proper answer to this question depends upon another : What ought we to think of Napoleon Bonaparte ? If Napoleon was, what English Tories and American Federalists said he was, the enemy of mankind, — and if England, in warring upon him, urns fighting the battle of mankind, — then the injuries received by neutral nations might have been borne without dishonor. When those giant belligerents were hurling continents at one another, the damage done to bystanders from the flying off of fragments was a thing to be expected, and submitted to as their share of the general ruin, — to be compensated by the final suppression of the common foe. To have endured this, and even to have submitted, for a time, to the searching of ships, so that not one Englishman should be allowed to skulk from such a fight, had not been pusil- lanimity, but magnanimity. But if, as English Whigs and Amer- ican Democrats contended, Napoleon Bonaparte was the armed soldier of democracy, the rightful heir of the Revolution, the sole alternative to anarchy, the legitimate ruler of France; if the responsibility of those enormous desolating wars does not lie at his door, but belongs to George III. and the Tory party of Eng- land ; if it is a fact that Napoleon always stood ready to make a just peace, which George III. and William Pitt refused, not in the interest of mankind and civilization, but in that of the Tory party and the allied dynasties, — then America was right in resenting the searching and seizure of her ships, and right, after exhausting every peaceful expedient, in declaring war. That this was really the point in dispute between our two parties is shown in the debates, newspapers, and pamphlets of the time. The Federalists, as Mr. Clay observed in one of his speeches, compared Napoleon to " every monster and beast, from that mentioned in the Revelation down to the most insignificant quadruped." The Republicans, on the contrary, spoke of him always with moderation and decency, sometimes with commenda- HENRY CLAY. 23 tion, and occasionally he was toasted at their public dinners with enthusiasm. Mr. Clay himself, while lamenting his enormous power and the suspension of ancient nationalities, always had a lurking sympathy with him. " Bonaparte," said he in his great war speech of 1813, "has been called the scourge of mankind, the destroyer of Europe, the great robber, the infidel, the modern Attila, and Heaven knows by what other names. Really, gentle- men remind me of an obscure lady, in a city not very far off, who also took it into her head, in conversation with an accomplished French gentleman, to talk of the affairs of Europe. She, too, spoke of the destruction of the balance of power ; stormed and raged about the insatiable ambition of the Emperor ; called him the curse of mankind, the destroyer of Europe. The French- man listened to her with perfect patience, and when she had ceased said to her, with ineffable politeness, ' Madam, it would give my master, the Emperor, infinite pain if he knew how hard- ly you thought of him.' " This brief passage suffices to show the prevailing tone of the two parties when Napoleon was the theme of discourse. It is, of course, impossible for us to enter into this question of Napoleon's moral position. Intelligent opinion, ever since the means of forming an opinion were accessible, has been constantly judging Napoleon more leniently, and the Tory party more severely. We can only say, that, in our opinion, the war of 1812 was just and necessary ; and that Henry Clay, both in supporting Mr. Jefferson's policy of non-intercourse and in supporting Pres- ident Madison's policy of war, deserved well of his country. Postponed that war might have been. But, human nature being what it is, and the English government being what it was, we do not believe that the United States could ever have been distinctly recognized as one of the powers of the earth without another fight for it. . The war being ended and the Federal party extinct, upon the young Republicans, who had carried on the war, devolved the task of "reconstruction." Before they had made much pro- gress in it, they came within an ace of being consigned to pri- vate life, — Clay himself having as narrow an escape as any of them. 24 HENRY CLAY. And here we may note one point of superiority of the Ameri- can government over others. In other countries it can some- times be the interest of politicians to foment and declare war. A war strengthens a tottering dynasty, an imperial parvenu, an odious tyrant, a feeble ministry ; and the glory won in battle on land and sea redounds to the credit of government, without raising up competitors for its high places. But let American politicians take note. It is never their interest to bring on a war ; because a war is certain to generate a host of popular heroes to outshine them and push them from their places. It may sometimes be their duty to advocate war, but it is never their interest. At this moment we see both parties striving which shall present to the people the most attractive list of mil- itary candidates ; and when a busy ward politician seeks his reward in custom-house or department, he finds a dozen lame soldiers competing for the place ; oue of whom gets it, — as he ought. What city has presented Mr. Stanton with a house, or Mr. Welles with fifty thousand dollars' worth of government bonds ? Calhoun precipitated the country into a war with Mex- ico ; but what did he gain by it but new bitterness of disap- pointment, while the winner of three little battles was elected President ? Henry Clay was the animating soul of the war of 1812, and we honor him for it; but while Jackson, Brown, Scott, Perry, and Decatur came out of that war the idols of the nation, Clay was promptly notified that his footing in the public councils, his hold of the public favor, was by no means stable. His offence was that he voted for the compensation bill of 181 G, which merely changed the pay of members of Congress from the pittance of six dollars a day to the pittance of fifteen hun- dred dollars a year. He who before was lord paramount in Kentucky saved his seat only by prodigious efforts on the stump, and by exerting all the magic of his presence in the canvass. No one ever bore cutting disappointment with an airier grace than this high-spirited thorough-bred ; but he evidently felt this apparent injustice. Some years later, when it was proposed in Congress to pension Commodore Perry's mother, Mr. Clay, HENRY CLAY. 25 in a speech of five minutes, totally extinguished the proposi- tion. Pointing to the vast rewards bestowed upon such success- ful soldiers as Marlborough, Napoleon, and Wellington, he said, with thrilling effect : " How different is the fate of the states- man ! In his quiet and less brilliant career, after having ad- vanced, by the wisdom of his measures, the national prosperity to the highest point of elevation, and after having sacrificed his fortune, his time, and perhaps his health, in the public ser- vice, what, too often, are the rewards that await him ? Who thinks of his family, impoverished by the devotion of his atten- tion to his country, instead of their advancement ? Who pro- poses to pension him, — much less his mother ? " He spoke the more feelingly, because he, who could have earned more than the President's income by the practice of his profession, was often pinched for money, and was once obliged to leave Congress for the sole purpose of taking care of his shattered fortune. He felt the importance of this subject in a national point of view. He wrote in 1817 to a friend : " Short as has been my service in the public councils, I have seen some of the most valuable members quitting the body from their inability to sustain the weight of these sacrifices. And in process of time, I appre- hend, this mischief will be more and more felt. Even now there are few, if any, instances of members dedicating their lives to the duties of legislation. Members stay a year or two ; curiosity is satisfied; the novelty wears off; expensive habits are brought or acquired ; their affairs at home are neglected ; their fortunes are wasting away ; and they are compelled to retire." The eight years of Mr. Monroe's administration — from 1817 to 1825 — were the most brilliant period of Henry Clay's ca- reer. His position as Speaker of the House of Representatives would naturally have excluded him from leadership ; but the House was as fond of hearing him speak as he could be of speak- ing, and opportunities were continually furnished him by going into Committee of the Whole. In a certain sense he was in op- portion to the administration. When one party has so frequent- ly and decidedly beaten the party opposed to it, that the defeated 2 26 HENRY CLAY. party goes out of existence, the conquering party soon divides. The triumphant Eepublicans of 1816 obeyed this law of their position ; — one wing of the party, under Mr. Monroe, being re- luctant to depart from the old Jeffersonian policy; the other wing, under Henry Clay, being inclined to go very far in internal improvements and a protective tariff. Mr. Clay now appears as the great champion of what he proudly styled the American Sys- tem. He departed farther and farther from the simple doctrines of the earlier Democrats. Before the war, he had opposed a national bank ; now he advocated the establishment of one, and handsomely acknowledged the change of opinion. Before the war, he proposed only such a tariff as would render America in- dependent of foreign nations in articles of the first necessity ; now he contemplated , the establishment of a great manufacturing system, which should attract from Europe skilful workmen, and supply the people with everything they consumed, even to jewel- ry and silver-ware. Such success had he with his American System, that, before many years rolled away, we see the rival wings of the Bepublican party striving which could concede most to the manufacturers in the way of an increased tariff. Every four years, when a President was to be elected, there was an inev- itable revision of the tariff, each faction outbidding the other in conciliating the manufacturing interest ; until at length the near discharge of the national debt suddenly threw into politics a prospective surplus, — one of twelve millions a year, — which came near crushing the American System, and gave Mr. Calhoun his pretext for nullification. At present, with such a debt as we have, the tariff is no longer a question with us. The government must have its million a day ; and as no tax is less offensive to the people than a duty on im- ported commodities, we seem compelled to a practically protective system for many years to come. But, of all men, a citizen of the United States should be the very last to accept the protective system as final ; for when he looks abroad over the great assem- blage of sovereignties which he calls the United States, and asks himself the reason of their rapid and uniform prosperity for the last eighty years, what answer can he give but this ? — There is HENRY CLAY. 27 free trade among them. And if he extends his survey over the whole earth, he can scarcely avoid the conclusion that free trade among all nations would be as advantageous to all nations as it is to the thirty-seven States of the American Union. But nations are not governed by theories and theorists, but by circumstances and politicians. The most perfect theory must sometimes give way to exceptional fact. We find, accordingly, Mr. Mill, the great English champion of free trade, fully sustaining Henry Clay's moderate tariff of 1816, but sustaining it only as a temporary measure. The paragraph of Mr. Mill's Political Economy which touches this subject seems to us to express so exactly the true policy of the United States with regard to the tariff, that we will take the liberty of emoting it. " The only case in which, on mere principles of political economy, protecting duties can be defensible, is when they are imposed tempora- rily, (especially in a young and rising nation,) in hopes of naturalizing a foreign industry, in itself perfectly suitable'to the circumstances of the country. The superiority of one country over another in a branch of production often arises only from having begun it sooner. There may be no inherent advantage on one part, or disadvantage on the other, but only a present superiority of acquired skill and experience. A country which has this skill and experience yet to acquire may, in other respects, be better adapted to the production than those which were earlier in the field ; and, besides, it is a just remark of Mr. Rae, that nothing has a greater tendency to promote improvement in any branch of production, than its trial under a new set of conditions. But it cannot be expected that individuals should, at their own risk, or rather to their certain loss, introduce a new manufacture, and bear the burden of carrying it on, until the producers have been educated up to the level of those with whom the processes are traditional. A pro- tecting duty, continued for a reasonable time, will sometimes be the least inconvenient mode in which the nation can tax itself for the sup- port of such an experiment. But the protection should be confined to cases in which there is good ground of assurance that the industry which it fosters will after a time be able to dispense with it ; nor should the domestic producers ever be allowed to expect that it will be continued to them beyond the time necessary for a fair trial of what they are capable of accomplishing." * * Mill's Principles of Political Economy, Book V. Ch. X. § 1- 28 HENRY CLAY. In the quiet of his library at Ashland, Mr. Clay, we believe, would, at any period of his public life, have assented to the doc- trines of this passage. But at Washington he was a party leader and an orator. Having set the ball in motion, he could not stop it ; nor does he appear to have felt the necessity of stopping it, until, in 1831, he was suddenly confronted by three Gorgons at once, — a coming Surplus, a President that vetoed internal im- provements, and an ambitious Calhoun, resolved on using the surplus either as a stepping-stone to the Presidency or a wedge with which to split the Union. The time to have put down the brakes was in 1828, when the national debt was within seven years of being paid off; but precisely then it was that both divi- sions of the Democratic party — one under Mr. Van Buren, the other under Mr. Clay — were running a kind of tariff race, neck and neck, in which Van Buren won. Mr. Clay, it is true, was not in Congress then, — he was Secretary of State ; but he was the soul of his party, and his voice was the voice of a master. In all his letters and speeches there is not a word to show that he then anticipated the surplus, or the embarrassments to which it gave rise ; though he could not have forgotten that a very trifling surplus was one of the chief anxieties of Mr. Jefferson's admin- istration. Mr. Clay's error, we think, arose from his not per- ceiving clearly that a protective tariff, though justifiable some- times, is always in itself an evil, and is never to be accepted as the permanent policy of any country ; and that, being an evil, it must be reduced to the minimum that will answer the temporary purpose. In estimating Henry Clay, we are always to remember that he was an orator. He had a genius for oratory. There is, we be- lieve, no example of a man endowed with a genius for oratory who also possessed an understanding of the first order. Mr. Clay's oratory was vivified by a good heart and a genuine love of coun- try ; and on occasions which required only a good heart, patriotic feeling, and an eloquent tongue, he served his country well. But as a party leader he had sometimes to deal with matters which demanded a radical and far-seeing intellect; and then, perhaps, he failed to guide his followers aright. At Washington, during HENRY CLAY. 29 the thirteen years of his Speakership, he led the gay life of a popular hero and drawing-room favorite ; and his position was supposed to compel him to entertain much company. As a young lawyer in Kentucky, he was addicted to playing those games of mere chance which alone at that day were styled gambling. He played high and often, as was the custom then all over the world. It was his boast, even in those wild days, that he never played at home, and never had a pack of cards in his house ; but when the lawyers and judges were assembled during court sessions, there was much high play among them at the tavern after the day's work was done. In 1806, when Mr. Clay was elected to the Senate, he resolved to gamble no more, — that is, to play at haz- ard and " brag " no more, — and he kept his resolution. Whist, being a game depending partly on skill, was not included in this resolution ; and whist was thenceforth a very favorite game with him, and he greatly excelled in it. It was said of him, as it was of Charles James Fox, that, at any moment of a hand, he could name all the cards that remained to be played. He discounte- nanced high stakes; and we believe he never, after 1806, played for more than five dollars " a corner." These, we know, were the stakes at Ghent, where he played whist for many months with the British Commissioners during the negotiations for peace in 1815. We mention his whist-playing only as part of the evi- dence that he was a gay, pleasant, easy man of the world, — not a student, not a thinker, not a philosopher. Often, in reading over his speeches of this period, we are ready to exclaim, ' ; Ah ! Mr. Clay, if you had played whist a little less, and studied history and statesmanship a great deal more, you would have avoided some errors ! " A trilling anecdote related by Mr. Colton lets us into the Speaker's way of life. " How can you preside over that House to-day ? " asked a friend, as he set Mr. Clay down at his own door, after sunrise, from a party. " Come up, and you shall see how I will throw the reins over their necks," replied the Speaker, as he stepped from the carriage.* * Daniel Webster once said of him in conversation : " Mr. Clay is a great man ; beyond all question a true patriot. He has done much for his country. He ought long ago to have been elected President. I think, however, he was 30 HENRY CLAY. But when noble feeling and a gifted tongue sufficed for the occasion, how grandly sometimes he acquitted himself in those brilliant years, when, descending from the Speaker's lofty seat, he held the House and the crowded galleries spellbound by his magnificent oratory ! His speech of 1818, for example, favoring the recognition of the South American republics, was almost as wise as it was eloquent ; for, although the provinces of South America are still far from being what we could wish them to be, yet it is certain that no single step of progress was possible for them until their connection with Spain was severed. Cuba, to- day, proves Mr. Clay's position. Tiie amiable and intelligent Creoles of that beautiful island are nearly ready for the abolition of slavery and for regulated freedom ; but they lie languishing under the hated incubus of Spanish rule, and dare not risk a war of independence, outnumbered as they are by untamed or half- tamed Africans. Mr. Clay's speeches in behalf of the young republics of South America were read by Bolivar at the head of his troops, and justly rendered his name dear to the struggling patriots. He had a clear conviction, like his master, Thomas Jefferson, that the interests of the United States lie chiefly in America, not Europe ; and it was a favorite dream of his to see the Western Continent occupied by flourishing republics, inde- pendent, but closely allied, — a genuine Holy Alliance. The supreme effort of Mr. Clay's Congressional life was in connection with the Missouri Compromise of 1821. He did not originate the plan of compromise, but it was certainly his influ- ence and tact which caused the plan to prevail. Fortunately, he had been absent from Congress during some of the earlier never a man of books, a hard student; but he has displayed remarkable genius. I never could imagine him sitting comfortably in his library, and read- ing quietly out of the great books of the past. He has been too fond of the world to enjoy anything like that. He has been too fond of excitement, — he has lived upon it; he has been too fond of company, not enough alone; and has had few resources within himself. Now a man who cannot, to some extent, depend upon himself for happiness, is to my mind one of the unfortunate. But Clay is a great man; and if he ever had animosities against me, I forgive him and forget them." These words were uttered at Marshfield when the news reached there that Mr. Clay was dying. HENEY CLAY. 31 attempts to admit Missouri ; and thus he arrived in Washington in January, 1821, calm, uncommitted, and welcome to both par- ties. Fierce debate had wrought up the minds of members to that point wbere useful discussion ceases to be possible. Almost every man had given personal offence and taken personal offence; the two sides seemed reduced to the most hopeless incompatibil- ity ; and the affair was at a dead lock. No matter what the sub- ject of debate, Missouri was sure, in some way, to get involved in it ; and the mere mention of the name was like a spark upon loose gunpowder. In February, for example, the House had to go through the ceremony of counting the votes for President of the United States, — a mere ceremony, since Mr. Monroe had been re-elected almost unanimously, and the votes of Missouri were of no importance. The tellers, to avoid giving cause of contention, announced that Mr. Monroe had received two hun- dred and thirty-one votes, including those of Missouri, and two hundred and twenty-eight if they were excluded. At this an- nouncement members sprang to their feet, and such a scene of confusion arose that no man could make himself heard. After a long struggle with the riot, the Speaker declared the House ad- journed. For six weeks Mr. Clay exerted his eloquence, his arts of pacification, and all the might of his personality, to bring mem- bers to their senses. He even had a long conference with his ancient foe, John Randolph. He threw himself into this work with such ardor, and labored at it so continuously, day and night, that, when the final triumph was won, he declared that, if Missouri had been kept out of the Union two weeks longer, he should have been a dead man. Thirty-four years after these events Mr. S. G. Goodrich wrote : " I was in the House of Rep- resentatives but a single hour. While I was present there was no direct discussion of the agitating subject which already filled everybody's mind, but still the excitement flared out occasionally in incidental allusions to it, like putfs of smoke and jets of flame which issue from a house that is on fire within. I recollect that Clay made a brief speech, thrilling the House by a single pas- sage, in which he spoke of 'poor, unheard Missouri,' she being 32 EENRY CLAY. then without a representative in Congress. His tall, tossing form, his long, sweeping gestures, and, above all, his musical yet thrilling tones, made an impression upon me which I can never forget." Mr. Clay, at length, had completed his preparations. He moved for a committee of the House to confer with a committee of the Senate. He himself wrote out the list of members whom he desired should be elected, and they were elected. At the last conference of the joint committees, which was held on a Sunday, Mr. Clay insisted that their report, to have the requisite effect upon Congress and the country, must be unanimous ; and unan- imous it was. Both Houses, with a surprising approach to unanimity, adopted the compromise proposed ; and thus was again postponed the bloody arbitrament to which the irrepres- sible controversy has since been submitted. Clay's masterly conduct on this occasion added his name to the long list of gentlemen who were mentioned for the succes- sion to Mr. Monroe in 1825. If the city of Washington had been the United States, if the House of Representatives had possessed the right to elect a President, Henry Clay might have been its choice. During the thirteen years of his Speakership not one of his decisions had been reversed ; and he had presided over the turbulent and restive House with that perfect blending of courtesy and firmness which at once restrains and charms. The debates just before the war, during the war, and after the war, had been violent and acrimonious ; but he had kept his own temper, and compelled the House to observe an approach to de- corum. On one occasion he came into such sharp collision with the excitable Randolph, that the dispute was transferred to the news- papers, and narrowly escaped degenerating from a war of "cards" to a conflict with pistols. But the Speaker triumphed ; the House and the country sustained him. On occasions of cere- mony the Speaker enchanted every beholder by the superb dig- nity of his bearing, the fitness of his words, and the tranquil depth of his tones. "What could be more eloquent, more appro- priate, than the Speaker's address of welcome to Lafayette, when the guest of the nation was conducted to the floor of the House HENRY CLAY. 33 of Representatives ? The House and the galleries were proud of the Speaker that day. No one who never heard this captiva- tor of hearts can form the slightest conception of the penetrating effect of the closing sentences, though they were spoken only in the tone of conversation. " The vain wish has been sometimes indulged, that Providence ■would allow the patriot, after death, to return to his country, and to contemplate the intermediate changes which had taken place ; to view the forests felled, the cities built, the mountains levelled, the canals cut, the highways constructed, the progress of the arts, the advance- ment oflearning, and the increase of population. General, your pres- ent visit to the United States is a realization of the consoling object of that wish. You are in the midst of posterity. Everywhere you must have been struck with the great changes, physical and moral, which have occurred since you left us. Even this very city, bearing a vener- ated name, alike endeared to you and to us, has since emerged from the forest which then covered its site. In one respect you behold us unaltered, and this is in the sentiment of continued devotion to liberty, and of ardent affection and profound gratitude to your departed friend, the father of his country, and to you, and to your illustrious associates in the field and in the cabinet, for the multiplied blessings which sur- round us, and for the very privilege of addressing you which I now exercise. This sentiment, now fondly cherished by more than ten millions of people, will be transmitted with unabated vigor down the tide of time, through the countless millions who are destined to inhabit this continent, to the latest posterity." The appropriateness of these sentiments to the occasion and to the man is evident to every one who remembers that Lafay- ette's love of George Washington was a Frenchman's romantic passion. Nor, indeed, did he need to have a sensitive French heart to be moved to tears by such words and such a welcome. From 1822 to 1848, a period of twenty-six years, Henry Clav lived the strange life of a candidate for the Presidency. It was enough to ruin any man, body and soul. To live always in the gaze of millions ; to be the object of eulogy the most extrava- gant and incessant from one half of the newspapers, and of vitu- peration still more preposterous from the other half ; to be sur- rounded by flatterers interested and disinterested, and to be 2* c 34 HENRY CLAY. confronted by another body intent on misrepresenting ever)' act and word ; to have to stop and consider the effect of every utterance, public and private, upon the next " campaign " ; not to be able to stir abroad without having to harangue a depu- tation of political friends, and stand to be kissed by ladies and pump-handled by men, and hide the enormous bore of it beneath a fixed smile till the very muscles of the face are rigid ; to receive by every mail letters enough for a large town ; to have your life written several times a year ; to be obliged continually to refute calumnies and " define your position " ; to live under a horrid necessity to be pointedly civil to all the world ; to find your most casual remarks and most private conversations getting distorted in print, — this, and more than this, it was to be a candidate for the Presidency. The most wonderful thing that we have to say of Henry Clay is, that, such were his native sincerity and health- fulness of mind, he came out of this fiery trial still a patriot and a man of honor. We believe it was a weakness in him, as it is in any man, to set his heart upon living four years in the White House ; but we can most confidently say, that, having entered the game, he played it fairly, and bore his repeated disappointments with genuine, high-bred composure. The closest scrutiny into the life of this man still permits us to believe that, when he said, " I would rather be right than be President," he spoke the real senti- ments of his heart ; and that, when he said to one of his political opponents, " Tell General Jackson that, if he will sign my Land Bill, I will pledge myself to retire from public life and never to re-enter it," he meant what he said, and would have stood to it. It is our privilege to believe this of Henry Clay ; nor do we think that there was ever anything morbidly excessive in his desire for the Presidency. He was the head and choice of a great political party ; in the principles of that party he fully believed ; and we think he did truly desire an election to the Presidency more from conviction than ambition. This may not have been the case in 1824, but we believe it was in 1832 and in 1844. The history of Henry Clay's Presidential aspirations and de- feats is little more than the history of a personal feud. In the HEXEY CLAY. 35 year 1819, it was his fortune to incur the hatred of the best hater then living, — Andrew Jackson. They met for the first time in November, 1815, when the hero of New Orleans came to Washington to consult with the administration respecting the. Indian and military affairs of his department. Each of these eminent men truly admired the other. Jackson saw in Clay the civil hero of the war, whose fiery eloquence had powerfully seconded its military heroes. Clay beheld in Jackson the man whose gallantly and skill had done most to justify the war in the sight of the people. They became immediately and cordially in- timate. Jackson engaged to visit Ashland in the course of the next summer, and spend a week there. On every occasion when Mr. Clay spoke of the heroes of the war, he bestowed on Jackson the warmest praise. In 1818 General Jackson invaded Florida, put to death two Indian chiefs in cold blood, and executed two British subjects, Arbuthnot and Armbrister.* During the twenty-seven days' debate upon these proceedings, in 1819, the Speaker sided with those who disapproved them, and he delivered a set speech against Jackson. This speech, though it did full justice to Gen- eral Jackson's motives, and contained a fine oulogium upon his previous services, gave the General deadly offence. Such wa j Jackson's self-love that he could not believe in the honesty of any opposition to him, but invariably attributed such opposition to low personal motives. Now it was a fact well known to Jack- son, that Henry Clay had expected the appointment of Secretary of State under Mr. Monroe ; and it was part of the gossip of the time that Mr. Monroe's preference of Mr. Adams was the reason of Clay's occasional opposition to measures favored by the ad- ministration. We do not believe this, because the measures which Mr. Clay opposed were such as he must have disapproved, and which well-informed posterity will forever disapprove. Af- ter much debate in the Cabinet, Mr. Monroe, who was peculiarly bound to Jackson, and who had reasons of his own for not offend- ing him, determined to sustain him in toto, both at home and in * This is the correct spelling of the name, as we learn from a living relative of the unfortunate man. It has been hitherto spelled Ambrister. 36 HENRY CLAY. the courts of Spain and England. Hence, in condemning Gen- eral Jackson, Mr. Clay was again in opposition to the adminis- tration ; and the General of course concluded, that the Speaker designed, in ruining him, merely to further his own political schemes. How he boiled with fury against Mr. Clay, his pub- lished letters amusingly attest. " The hypocrisy and baseness of Clay," wrote the General, " in pretending friendship to me, and endeavoring to crush the Executive through me, makes me de- spise the villain." Jackson, as we all know, was triumphantly sustained by the House. In fact, Mr. Clay's speech was totally unworthy of the occasion. Instead of argument and fact, he gave the House and the galleries beautiful declamation. The evidence was before him ; he had it in his hands ; but, instead of getting up his case with patient assiduity, and exhibiting the damning proofs of Jack- son's misconduct, he merely glanced over the mass of papers, fell into some enormous blunders, passed over some most material points, and then endeavored to supply all deficiencies by an im- posing eloquence. He even acknowledges that he had not ex- amined the testimony. " It is possible" said he, " that a critical examination of the evidence would show " that Arbuthnot was an innocent trader. We have had occasion to examine that evidence since, and we can testify that this conjecture was correct. But why was it a conjecture ? Why did Mr. Clay neglect to convert the conjecture into certainty? It fell to him, as representing the civilization and humanity of the United States, to vindicate the memory of an honorable old man, who had done all that was possible to prevent the war, and who had been ruthlessly mur- dered by men wearing the uniform of American soldiers. It fell to him to bar the further advancement of a man most unfit for civil rule. To this duty he was imperatively called, but he only half did it, and thus exasperated the tiger without disabling him. Four years passed. In December, 1823, General Jackson re- appeared in Washington to take his seat in the Senate, to which he had been elected by his wire-pullers for the purpose of pro- moting his interests as a candidate for the Presidency. Before HENRY CLAY. 37 he left home two or three of his friends had besought him to assume a mild and conciliatory demeanor at the capitol. It would never do, they told him, for a candidate for the Presidency to threaten to cut off the ears of gentlemen who disapproved his public conduct ; he must restrain himself and make friends. This advice he followed. He was reconciled with General Win- field Scott, whom, in 1817, he had styled an " assassin," a i£ hector- ing bully," and an " intermeddling pimp and spy of the War Of- fice." He made friends with Colonel Thomas H. Benton, with whom he had fought in the streets of Nashville, while he still carried in his body a bullet received in that bloody affray. With Henry Clay, too, he resumed friendly intercourse, met him twice at dinner-parties, rode and exchanged visits with him, and attend- ed one of the Speaker's Congressional dinners. When next these party chieftains met, in the spring of 1825, it was about to devolve upon the House of Representatives to de- cide which of three men should be the next President, — Jack- son, Adams, or Crawford. They exchanged visits as before ; Mr. Clay being desirous, as he said, to show General Jackson that, in the vote which he had determined to give, he was influenced only by public considerations. No reader needs to be informed that Mr. Clay and his friends were able to decide the election, and that they decided it in favor of Mr. Adams. We believe that Mr. Clay was wrong in so doing. As a Democrat he ought, we think, to have been willing to gratify the plurality of his fellow- citizens, who had voted for General Jackson. His motives we fully believe to have been disinterested. Indeed, it was plainly intimated to him that, if he gave the Presidency to General Jackson, General Jackson would make him his heir apparent, or, in other words, his Secretary of State. The auger of General Jackson at his disappointment was not the blind and wild fury of his earlier days ; it was a deeper, a deadlier wrath, which he governed and concealed in order to wreak a feller vengeance. On the evening of the day on which the election in the House occurred there was a levee at the Presidential mansion, which General Jackson attended. Who, that saw him dart forward and grasp Mr. Adams cordially by the 38 HENRY CLAY. hand, could have supposed that he then entirely believed that Mr. Adams had stolen the Presidency from him by a corrupt bargain with Mr. Clay ? Who could have supposed that he and his friends had been, for fourteen days, hatching a plot to blast the good name of Mr. Adams and Mr. Clay, by spreading abroad the base insinuation that Clay had been bought over to the sup- port of Adams by the promise of the first place in the Cabinet ? Who could have supposed that, on his way home to Tennessee, while the newspapers were paragraphing his magnanimity in de- feat, as shown by his behavior at the levee, he would denounce Adams and Clay, in bar-rooms and public places, as guilty of a foul compact to frustrate the wishes of the people ? It was calumny's masterpiece. It was a rare stroke of art to get an old dotard of a member of Congress to publish, twelve days before the election, that Mr. Clay had agreed to vote for Mr. Adams, and that Mr. Adams had agreed to reward him by the office of Secretary of State. When the vote had been given and the office conferred, how plausible, how convincing, the charge of bargain ! It is common to censure Mr. Clay for accepting office under Mr. Adams. We honor him for his courage in doing so. Hav- ing made Mr. Adams President, it had been unlike the gallant Kentuckian to shrink from the possible odium of the act by re- fusing his proper place in the administration. The calumny which anticipated his acceptance of office was a defiance : Take office if you dare! It was simply worthy of Henry Clay to accept the challenge, and brave all the consequences of what he had de- liberately and conscientiously done. In the office of Secretary of State Mr. Clay exhibited an ad- mirable talent for the despatch of business. He negotiated an unusual number of useful treaties. He exerted himself to secure a recognition of the principles, that, in time of Avar, private property should enjoy on the ocean the same protection as on land, and that paper blockades are not to be regarded. He seconded Mr. Adams in his determination not to remove from office any man on account of his previous or present opposition to the administration ; and he carried this policy so far, that, in HENRY CLAY. 39 selecting the newspapers for the publication of the laws, he re- fused to consider their political character. This was in strict accordance with the practice of all previous administrations ; but it is so pleasant to recur to the times when that honorable policy prevailed, that we cannot help alluding to it. In his intercourse with foreign ministers, Mr. Clay had an opportunity to display all the charms of an unequalled courtesy : they remained his friends long after he had retired. His Wednesday dinners and his pleasant evening receptions were remembered for many years. How far he sympathized with Mr. Adams's extravagant dreams of a system of national works that should rival the magnificent structures of ancient Rome, or with the extreme opinions of his colleague, Mr. Rush, as to the power and importance of govern- ment, we do not know. He worked twelve hours a day in his office, he tells us, and was content therewith. He was the last high officer of the government to fight a duel. That bloodless contest between the Secretary of State and John Randolph was as romantic and absurd as a duel could well be. Colonel Ben- ton's narrative of it is at once the most amusing and the most affecting piece of gossip which our political annals contain. Randolph, as the most unmanageable of members of Congress, had been for fifteen years a thorn in Mr. Clay's side, and Clay's later politics had been most exasperating to Mr. Randolph ; but the two men loved one another in their hearts, aft it all. Noth- ing has ever exceeded the thorough-bred courtesy and tender consideration with which they set about the work of putting one another to death ; and their joy was unbounded when, after the second fire, each discovered that the other was unharmed. If all duels could have such a result, duelling would be the prettiest tiling in the world. The election of 1828 swept the administration from power. No man has ever bowed more gracefully to the decision of the people than Henry Clay. His remarks at the public dinner given him in Washington, on his leaving for home, were entirely admirable. Andrew Jackson, he said, had wronged him, but he was now the Chief Magistrate of his country, and, as such, he should be treated with decorum, and his public acts judged with 40 HENRY CLAY. candor. His journey to Ashland was more like the progress of a victor than the return homeward of a rejected statesman. He now entered largely into his favorite branch of rural busi- ness, the raising of superior animals. Fifty merino sheep were driven over the mountains from Pennsylvania to his farm, and he imported from England some Durham and Hertford cattle. He had an Arabian horse in his stable. For the improvement of the breed of mules, he imported an ass from Malta, and an- other from Spain. Pigs, goats, and dogs he also raised, and endeavored to improve. His slaves being about fifty in number, he was able to carry on the raising of hemp and corn, as well as the breeding of stock, and both on a considerable scale. Mrs. Clay sent every morning to the principal hotel of Lexington thirty gallons of milk, and her husband had large consignments to make to his factor in New Orleans. His letters of this period show how he delighted in his animals and his growing crops, and how thoughtfully he considered the most trifling details of man- agement. His health improved. He told his old friend, Wash- ington Irving, that he found it was as good for men as for beasts to be turned out to grass occasionally. Though not without domestic afflictions, he was very happy in his home. One of his sons graduated second at West Point, and two of his daughters were happily married. He was, perhaps, a too indulgent father; but his children loved him most tenderly, and were guided by his opinion. It is pleasing to read in the letters of his sons to him such passages as this : "You tell me that you wish me to receive your opinions, not as commands, but as advice. Yet I must con- sider them as commands, doubly binding ; for they proceed from one so vastly my superior in all respects, and to whom I am un- der such great obligations, that the mere intimation of an opinion will be sufficient to govern my conduct." The President, meanwhile, was paying such homage to the farmer of Ashland as no President of the United States had ever paid to a private individual. General Jackson's principal object — the object nearest his heart — appears to have been to wound and injure Henry Clay. His appointments, his measures, and his vetoes seem to have been chiefly inspired by resentment against HENRY CLAY. 41 him. Ingliam of Pennsylvania, who had taken the lead in that State in giving currency to the " bargain " calumny, was appoint- ed Secretary of the Treasury. Eaton, who had aided in the original concoction of that foul slander, was appointed Secretary of War. Branch, who received the appointment of Secretary of the Navy, was one of the few Senators who had voted and spok- en against the confirmation of Henry Clay to the office of Secre- tary of State in 1825 ; and Berrien, Attorney- General, was another. Barry, appointed Postmaster-General, was the Ken- tuckian who had done most to inflict upon Mr. Clay the mortifi- cation of seeing his own Kentucky siding against him. John Randolph, Clay's recent antagonist in a duel, and the most unfit man in the world for a diplomatic mission, was sent Minister to Russia. Pope, an old Kentucky Federalist, Clay's opponent and competitor for half a lifetime, received the appointment of Gov- ernor of the Territory of Arkansas. General Harrison, who had generously defended Clay against the charge of bargain and cor- ruption, was recalled from a foreign mission on the fourth day after General Jackson's accession to power, though he had scarce- ly reached the country to which he was accredited. In the place of General Harrison was sent a Kentuckian peculiarly obnoxious to Mr. Clay. In Kentucky itself there was a clean sweep from office of Mr. Clay's friends ; not one man of them was left. His brother-in-law, James Brown, was instantly recalled from a diplo- matic post in Europe. Kendall, the chief of the Kitchen Cab- inet, had once been tutor to Mr. Clay's children, and had won the favor of Jackson by lending a dexterous hand in carrying Kentucky against his benefactor. Francis Blair, editor of the Globe, had also been the particular friend and correspondent of Mr. Clay, but had turned against him. From the Departments in "Wash- ington, all of Mr. Clay's known friends were immediately removed, except a few who had made themselves indispensable, and a few others whom Mr. Van Buren contrived to spare. In nearly every instance, the men who succeeded to the best •places had made themselves conspicuous by their vituperation of Mr. Clay. He was strictly correct when he said, k< Every move- ment of the President is dictated by personal hostility toward 42 HENRY CLAY. me " ; but he was deceived when he added that it all conduced to his benefit. Every mind that was both just and well-informed warmed toward the object of such pitiless and demoniac wrath ; but in what land are minds just and well-informed a majority ? It was not only the appointments and removals that were aimed at Mr. Clay. The sudden expulsion of gray hairs from the offi- ces they had honored, the precipitation of hundreds of families into poverty, — this did not satisfy the President's vengeance. He assailed Henry Clay in his first Message. In recommending a change in the mode of electing the President, he said that, when the election devolves upon the House of Representatives, circumstances may give the power of deciding the election to one man. " May he not be tempted," added the President, " to name his reward ? " He vetoed appropriations for the Cumberland Road, because the name and the honor of Henry Clay were pe- culiarly identified with that work. He destroyed the Bank of the United States, because he believed its power and influence were to be used in favor of Mr. Clay's elevation to the Presiden- cy. He took care, in his Message vetoing the recharter of the Bank, to employ some of the arguments which Clay had used in opposing the recharter of the United States Bank in 1811. Mis- erably sick and infirm as he was, he consented to stand for re- election, because there was no other candidate strong enough to defeat Henry Clay ; and he employed all his art, and the whole power of the administration, during his second term, to smooth Mr. Van Buren's path to the Presidency, to the exclusion of Henry Clay. Plans were formed, too, and engagements made, the grand object of which was to keep Clay from the Presi- dency, even after Mr. Van Buren should have served his anticipated eight years. General Jackson left Washington in 1837, expecting that Martin Van Buren would be President until 1845, and that he would then be succeeded by Thomas H. Ben- ton. Nothing prevented the fulfilment of this programme but the financial collapse of 1837, the effects of which continued during the whole of Mr. Van Buren's term, and caused his de- feat in 1840. Mr. Clay accepted the defiance implied in General Jackson's HENRY CLAY. 43 conduct. He reappeared in Washington in 1831, in the charac- ter of Senator and candidate for the Presidency. His journey to Washington was again a triumphal progress, and again the gal- leries were crowded to hear him speak. A great and brilliant party gathered round him, strong in talents, character, property, and supposed to be strong in numbers. He at once proved him- self to be a most unskilful party leader. Every movement of his in that character was a mistake. He was precipitate when he ought to have been cautious, and cautious when nothing but audacity could have availed. The first subject upon which he was called upon to act was the tariff. The national debt being within two or three years of liquidation, Calhoun threatening nul- lification, and Jackson vetoing all internal improvement bills, it was necessary to provide against an enormous surplus. Clay maintained that the protective duties should remain intact, and that only those duties should be reduced which protected no American interest. This was done ; the revenue was reduced three millions ; and the surplus was as threatening as before. It was impossible to save the protective duties entire without raising too much revenue. Mr. Clay, as it seems to us, should have plainly said this to the manufacturers, and compelled his party in Congress to warn and save them by making a judicious cut at the protective duties in 1832. This would have deprived Cal- houn of his pretext, and prepared the way for a safe and gradual reduction of duties in the years following. Such was the pros- perity of the country in 1832, that the three millions lost to the revenue by Mr. Clay's bill were likely to be made up to it in three years by the mere increase in the imports and land sales. Mr. Clay's next misstep was one of precipitation. General Jackson, after a three years' war upon the Bank, was alarmed at the outcry of its friends, and sincerely desired to make peace with it. We know, from the avowals of the men who stood near- est his person at the time, that he not only wished to keep the Bank question out of the Presidential campaign of 1832, but that he was willing to consent, on very easy conditions, to a recharter. It was Mr. Clay's commanding influence that induced the direc- tors of the Bank to press for a recharter in 1832, and force the 44 HENRY CLAY. President to retraction or a veto. So ignorant was this able and high-minded man of human nature and of the American people, that he supposed a popular enthusiasm could be kindled in behalf of a bank! Such was the infatuation of some of his friends, that they went to the expense of circulating copies of the veto message gratis, for the purpose of lessening the vote for its author ! Mr. Clay was ludicrously deceived as to his strength with the masses of the people, — the dumb masses, — those who have no eloquent orators, no leading newspapers, no brilliant pamphleteers, to speak for them, but who assert themselves with decisive effect on elec- tion clay. It was another capital error in Mr. Clay, as the leader of a party, to run at all against General Jackson. He should have hoarded his prestige for 1836, when the magical name of Jackson would no longer captivate the ignorant voter. Mr. Clay's defeat in 1832, so unexpected, so overwhelming, lamed him for life as a candidate for the Presidency. He lost faith in his star. In 1836, when there was a chance of success, — just a chance, — he would not suffer his name to appear in the canvass. The vote of the opposition was divided among three candidates, — General Har- rison, Hugh L. White, and Daniel Webster ; and Mr. Van Buren, of course, had an easy victory. Fortunately for his own happi- ness, Mr. Clay's desire for the Presidency diminished as his chances of reaching it diminished. That desire had never been morbid, it now became exceedingly moderate ; nor do we believe that, after his crushing defeat of 1832, he ever had much expec- tation of winning the prize. He knew too well the arts by which success is assured, to believe that an honorable man could be elected to the Presidency by honorable means only. Three other attempts were made to raise him to the highest office, and it was always Andrew Jackson who struck him down. In 1840, he was set aside by his party, and General Harrison nominated in his stead. This was Jackson's doing ; for it was the great defeat of 1832 which had robbed Clay of prestige, and it was General Jackson's uniform success that suggested the selec- tion of a military candidate. Again, in 1844, when the Texas issue was presented to the people, it was by the adroit use of HEXBY CLAY. 45 General Jackson's name that the question of annexation was pre- cipitated upon the country. In 1848, a military man was again nominated, to the exclusion of Henry Clay. Mr. Clay used to boast of his consistency, averring that he had never changed his opinion upon a public question but once. We think he was much too consistent. A notable example of an ex- cessive consistency was his adhering to the project of a United States Bank, when there was scarcely a possibility of establishing one, and his too steadfast opposition to the harmless expedient of the Sub-treasury. The Sub-treasury system has now been in operation for a quarter of a century. Call it a bungling and an- tiquated system, if you will ; it has nevertheless answered its purpose. The public money is taken out of politics. If the few millions lying idle in the " Strong Box" do no good, they at least do no harm ; and we have no overshadowing national bank to compete with private capital, and to furnish, every few years, a theme for demagogues." Mr. Clay saw in the Sub-treasury the ruin of the Republic. In his great speech of 1838, in opposition to it, he uttered, in his most solemn and impressive manner, the following words : — " Mr. President, a great, novel, and untried measure is perseveringly urged upon the acceptance of Congress. That it is pregnant with tre- mendous consequences, for good or evil, is undeniable, and admitted by all. We firmly believe that it will be fatal to the best interests of this country, and ultimately subversive of its liberties.'' No one acquainted with Mr. Clay, and no man, himself sin- cere, who reads this eloquent and most labored speech, can doubt Mr. Clay's sincerity. Observe the awful solemnity of his first sentences : — "I have seen some public service, passed through many troubled times, and often addressed public assemblies, in this Capitol and else- where ; but never before have I risen in a deliberative body under more oppressed feelings, or with a deeper sense of awful responsibility. Never before have I risen to express my opinions upon any public measure fraught with such tremendous consequences to the welfare and prosperity of the country, and so perilous to the liberties of the people, as I solemnly believe the bill under consideration will be. If you 46 * HENRY CLAY. knew, sir, what sleepless hours reflection upon it has cost me, if you knew with what fervor and sincerity I have implored Divine assistance to strengthen and sustain me in my opposition to it, I should have credit with you, at least, for the sincerity of my convictions, if I shall be so unfortunate as not to have your concurrence as to the dangerous character of the measure. And I have thanked my God that he has prolonged my life until the present time, to enable me to exert myself, in the service of my country, against a project far transcending in per- nicious tendency any that I have ever had occasion to consider. I thank him for the health I am permitted to enjoy ; I thank him for the soft and sweet repose which I experienced last night ; I thank him for the bright and glorious sun which shines upon us this day." And what tvas the question at issue? It was whether Nicholas Biddle should have the custody of the public money at Philadel- phia, and use the average balance in discounting notes ; or whether Mr. Cisco should keep it at New York in an exceed- ingly strong vault, and not use any of it in discounting notes. As the leader of a national party Mr. Clay failed utterly ; for he was neither bad enough to succeed by foul means, nor skilful enough to succeed by fair means. But in his character of patriot, orator, or statesman, he had some brilliant successes in his later years. When Jackson was ready to concede all to the Nullifiers, and that suddenly, to the total ruin of the protected manufacturers, it was Clay's tact, parliamentary experience, and personal power that interposed the compromise tariff, which re- duced duties gradually instead of suddenly. The Compromise of 1850, also, which postponed the Rebellion ten years, was chiefly his Avork. That Compromise was the best then attain- able ; and we think that the country owes gratitude to the man who deferred the Rebellion to a time when the United States was strong enough to subdue it. Posterity, however, will read the speeches of Mr. Clay upon the various slavery questions agitated from 1835 to 1850 with mingled feelings of admiration and regret. A man compelled to live in the midst of slavery must hate it and actively oppose it, or else be, in some degree, corrupted by it. As Thomas Jeffer- son came at length to acquiesce in slavery, and live contentedly with it, so did Henry Clay lose some of his early horror of the HENRY CLAY. 47 system, and accept it as a necessity. True, he never lapsed into the imbecility of pretending to think slavery right or best, but he saw no way of escaping from it; and when asked his opinion as to the final solution of the problem, he could only throw it upon Providence. Providence, he said, would remove the evil in its own good time, and nothing remained for men but to cease the agitation of the subject. His first efforts, as his last, were directed to the silencing of both parties, but most especially the Abolition- ists, whose character and aims he misconceived. With John C. Calhoun sitting near him in the Senate-chamber, and with fire- eaters swarming at the other end of the Capitol, he could, as late as 1843, cast the whole blame of the slavery excitement upon the few individuals at the North who were beginning to discern the ulterior designs of the Nullifiers. Among his letters of 1843 there is one addressed to a friend who was about to write a pam- phlet against the Abolitionists. Mr. Clay gave him an outline of what he thought the pamphlet ought to be. " The great aim and object of your tract should be to arouse the la- boring classes in the Free States against abolition. Depict the conse- quences to them of immediate abolition. The slaves, being free, would be dispersed throughout the Union ; they would enter into competition with the free laborer, with the American, the Irish, the German ; re- duce his wages ; be confounded with him, and ail'ect his moral and social standing. And as the ultras go for both abolition and amalga- mation, show that their object is to unite in marriage the laboring white man and the laboring black man, and to reduce the white labor- ing man to the despised and degraded condition of the black man. " I would show their opposition to colonization. Show its humane, religious, and patriotic aims ; that they are to separate those whom God has separated. Why do the Abolitionists oppose colonization ? To keep and amalgamate together the two races, in violation of God's will, and to keep the blacks here, that they may interfere with, de- grade, and debase the laboring whites. Show that the British nation is co-operating with the Abolitionists, for the purpose of dissolving the Union, etc." This is so very absurd, that, if we did not know it to express Mr. Clay's habitual feeling at that time, we should be compelled to see in it, not Henry Clay, but the candidate for the Presi- 48 HENRY CLAY. dency. He really thought so in 1843. He was perfectly con- vinced that the white race and the black could not exist together on equal terms. One of his last acts was to propose emancipa- tion in Kentucky; but it was an essential feature of his plan to transport the emancipated blacks to Africa. When we look over Mr. Clay's letters and speeches of those years, we meet with so much that is short-sighted and grossly erroneous, that we are obliged to confess that this man, gifted as he was, and dear as his memory is to us, shared the judicial blindness of his order. Its baseness and arrogance he did not share. His head was often wrong, but his heart was generally right. It atones for all his mere errors of abstract opinion, that he was never admitted to the confidence of the Nullifiers, and that he uniformly voted against the measures inspired by them. He was against the un- timely annexation of Texas ; he opposed the rejection ' of the anti-slavery petitions ; and he declared that no earthly power should ever induce him to consent to the addition of one acre of slave territory to the possessions of the United States. It is proof positive of a man's essential soundness, if he im- proves as he grows old. Henry Clay's last years were his best ; he ripened to the very end. His friends remarked the moder- ation of his later opinions, and his charity for those who had injured him most. During the last ten years of his life no one ever heard him utter a harsh judgment of an opponent. Domes- tic afflictions, frequent and severe, had chastened his heart ; his six affectionate and happy daughters were dead ; one son was a hopeless lunatic in an asylum ; another was not what such a father had a right to expect ; and, at length, his favorite and most promising son, Henry, in the year 1847, fell at the battle of Buena Vista. It was just after this last crushing loss, and probably in consequence of it, that he was baptized and confirmed a member of the Episcopal Church. When, in 1849, he reappeared in the Senate, to assist, if possi- ble, in removing the slavery question from politics, he was an in- firm and serious, but not sad, old man of seventy-two. He never lost his cheerfulness or his faith, but he felt deeply for his dis- tracted country. During that memorable session of Congress he HEXEY CLAY. 49 spoke seventy times. Often extremely sick and feeble, scarcely able, with the assistance of a friend's arm, to climb the steps of the Capitol, he was never absent on the days when the Compro- mise was to be debated. It appears to be well attested, that his last great speech on the Compromise was the immediate cause of his death. On the morning on which he began his speech, he was accompanied by a clerical friend, to whom he said, on reach- ing the long flight of steps leading to the Capitol, " Will you lend me your arm, my friend ? for I find myself quite weak and ex- hausted this morning." Every few steps he was obliged to stop and take breath. " Had you not better defer your speech ? " asked the clergyman. " My dear friend," said the dying orator, " I consider our country in danger ; and if I can be the means, in any measure, of averting that danger, my health or life is of little consequence." When he rose to speak, it was but too evident that he was unfit for the task he had undertaken. But, as he kindled with his subject, his cough left him, and his bent form resumed all its wonted erectness and majesty. lie may, in the prime of his strength, have spoken with more energy, but never with so much pathos and grandeur. His speech lasted two days, and, though he lived two years longer, he never recovered from the effects of the effort. Toward the close of the second day, his friends repeatedly proposed an adjournment ; but he would not desist until he had given complete utterance to his feelings. He said afterwards that he was not sure, if he gave way to an adjournment, that he should ever be able to resume. In the course of this long debate, Mr. Clay said some things to which the late war has given a new interest. He knew, at last, what the fire-eaters meant. He perceived now that it was not the few abhorred Abolitionists of the Northern States from whom danger to the Union was to be apprehended. On one occasion allusion was made to a South Carolina hot-head, who had public- ly proposed to raise the flag of disunion. Thunders of applause broke from the galleries when Mr. Clay retorted by saying, that, if Mr. Rhett had really made that proposition, and should follow it up by corresponding acts, he would be a traitor ; " and," 3 D 50 HENRY CLAY. added Mr. Clay, " I hope he will meet a traitor's fate." When the chairman had succeeded in restoring silence, Mr. Clay made that celebrated declaration which was so frequently quoted in 1861 : " If Kentucky to-morrow should unfurl the banner of re- sistance unjustly, I will never fight under that banner. I owe a paramount allegiance to 'the whole Union, — a subordinate one to my own State." He said also : " If any one State, or a portion of the people of any State, choose to place themselves in military array against the government of the Union, I am for trying the strength of the government. I am for ascertaining whether we have a government or not." Again : " The Senator speaks of Virginia being my country. This Union, sir, is my country ; the thirty States are my country ; Kentucky is my country, and Virginia no more than any State in the Union." And yet again : " There are those who think that the Union must be preserved by an exclusive reliance upon love and reason. That is not my opinion. I have some confidence in this instrumentality ; but, depend upon it that no human government can exist without the power of applying force, and the actual application of it in ex- treme cases." Who can estimate the influence of these clear and emphatic utterances ten years after ? The crowded galleries, the number- less newspaper reports, the quickly succeeding death of the great orator, — all aided to give them currency and effect. We shall never know how many wavering minds they aided to decide in 1861. Not that Mr. Clay really believed the conflict would occur : he was mercifully permitted to die in the conviction that the Compromise of 1850 had removed all immediate danger, and greatly lessened that of the future. Far indeed was he from foreseeing that the ambition of a man born in New England, calling himself a disciple of Andrew Jackson, would, within five years, destroy all compromises, and render all future compromise impossible, by procuring the repeal of the first, — the Missouri Compromise of 1821. Henry Clay was formed by nature to please, to move, and to impress his countrymen. Never was there a more captivating presence. We remember hearing Horace Greeley say that, if a HENRY CLAY. 51 man only saw Henry Clay's back, he would know that it was the back of a distinguished man. How his presence filled a drawing- room ! With what an easy sway he held captive ten acres of mass-meeting ! And, in the Senate, how skilfully he showed himself respectfully conscious of the galleries, without appearing to address them ! Take him for all in all, we must regard him as the first of American orators ; but posterity will not assign him that rank, because posterity will not hear that matchless voice, will uot see those large gestures, those striking attitudes, that grand manner, which gave to second-rate composition first- rate effect. He could not have been a great statesman, if he had been ever so greatly endowed. While slavery existed no states- manship was possible, except that which was temporary and tem- porizing. The thorn, we repeat, was in the flesh ; and the doctors were all pledged to try and cure the patient without extracting it. They could do nothing but dress the wound, put on this salve and that, give the sufferer a little respite from anguish, and, after a brief interval, repeat the operation. Of all these physicians Henry Clay was the most skilful and effective. He both handled the sore place with consummate dexterity, and kept up the con- stitution of the patient by stimulants, which enabled him, at last, to live through the appalling operation which removed the cause of his agony. Henry Clay was a man of honor and a gentleman. He kept his word. He was true to his friends, his party, and his convic- tions. He paid his debts and his son's debts. The instinct of solvency was very strong in him. Pie had a religidn, of which the main component parts were self-respect and love of country. These were supremely authoritative with him ; he would not do anything which he felt to be beneath Henry Clay, or which he thought would be injurious to the United States. Five times a candidate for the Presidency, no man can say that he ever pur- chased support by the promise of an office, or by any other en- gagement savoring of dishonor. Great talents and a great under- standing are seldom bestowed on the same individual. Mr. Clay's usefulness as a statesman was limited by his talent as an orator. He relied too much on his oratory ; he was never such a 52 HENRY CLAY. student as a man intrusted with public business ought to be. Hence be originated nothing and establisbed nothing. His speeches will long be interesting as the relics of a magnificent and dazzling personality, and for the light they cast upon the his- tory of parties ; but they add scarcely anything to the intellectu- al property of the nation. Of American orators he was the first whose speeches were ever collected in a volume. Millions read them with admiration in his lifetime ; but already they have sunk to the level of the works "without which no gentleman's library is complete," — works which every one possesses and no one reads. Henry Clay, regarded as a subject for biography, is still un- touched. Campaign Lives of him can be collected by the score ; and the Rev. Calvin Colton wrote three volumes purporting to be the Life of Henry Clay. Mr. Colton was a very honest gentle- man, and not wanting in ability ; but writing, as he did, in Mr. Clay's own house, he became, as it were, enchanted by his sub- ject. He was enamored of Mr. Clay to such a degree that his pen ran into eulogy by an impulse which was irresistible, and which he never attempted to resist. In point of arrangement, too, his work is chaos come again. A proper biography of Mr. Clay would be one of the most entertaining and instructive of works. It would embrace the ever-memorable rise and first triumphs of the Democratic party ; the wild and picturesque life of the early settlers of Kentucky ; the war of 1812 ; Congress from 1806 to 1852 ; the fury and corruption of Jackson's reign ; and the three great compromises which postponed the Rebellion. All the lead- ing men and all the striking events of our history would con- tribute something to the interest and value of the work. Why go to antiquity or to the Old "World for subjects, when such a subject as this remains unwritten ? DANIEL WEBSTER. DANIEL WEBSTER. OF words spoken in recent times, few have touched so many- hearts as those uttered by Sir Walter Scott on his death- bed. There has seldom been so much of mere enjoyment crowded into the compass of one lifetime as there was into his. Even his work — all of his best work — was only more elaborate and keenly relished play ; for story-telling, the occupation of his maturity, had first been the delight of his childhood, and re- mained always his favorite recreation. Triumph rewarded his early efforts, and admiration followed him to the grave. Into no human face could this man look, nor into any crowd of faces, which did not return his glance with a gaze of admiring love. He lived precisely where and how it was happiest for him to live ; and he had above most men of his time that disposition of mind which makes the best of bad fortune and the most of good. But when his work and his play were all done, and he came calmly to review his life, and the life of man on earth, this was the sum of his reflections, this was what he had to say to the man to whom he had confided his daughter's happiness : " Lockhart, I may have but a minute to speak to you. My dear, be a good man, — be virtuous, — be religious, — be a good man. Noth- ing else will give you any comfort when you come to lie here." So do we all feel in view of the open coffin, much as we may differ as to what it is to be good, virtuous, and religious. Was this man, who lies dead here before us, faithful to his trust ? Was he sincere, pure, just, and benevolent? Did he help civili- zation, or was he an obstacle in its way ? Did he ripen and im- prove to the end, or did he degenerate and go astray ? These are 56 DANIEL WEBSTER. the questions which are silently considered when we look upon the still countenance of death, and especially when the departed was a person who influenced his generation long and powerfully. Usually it is only the last of these questions which mortals can answer with any certainty ; but from the answer to that one we infer the answers to all the others. As it is only the wise who learn, so it is only the good who improve. When we see a man gaining upon his faults as he advances in life, when we find him more self-contained and cheerful, more learned and inquisitive, more just and considerate, more single-eyed and noble in his aims, at fifty than he was at forty, and at seventy than he was at fifty, we have the best reason perceptible by human eyes for con- cluding that he has been governed by right principles and good feelings. We have a right to pronounce such a person good, and he is justified in believing us. The three men most distinguished in public life during the last forty years in the United States were Henry Clay, John C. Cal- houn, and Daniel Webster. Henry Clay improved as he grew old. He was a venerable, serene, and virtuous old man. The impetuosity, restlessness, ambition, and love of display, and the detrimental habits of his earlier years, gave place to tranquillity, temperance, moderation, and a patriotism without the alloy of personal objects. Disappointment had chastened, not soured him. Public life enlarged, not narrowed him. The city of Washington purified, not corrupted him. He came there a gambler, a driuker, a profuse consumer of tobacco, and a turner of night into day. He overcame the worst of those habits very early in his residence at the capital. He came to Washington to exhibit his talents, he remained there to serve his country ; nor of his country did he ever think the less, or serve her less zealously, because she denied him the honor he coveted for thirty years. We cannot say this of Calhoun. He degenerated fright- fully during the last twenty years of his life. His energy degen- erated into intensity, and his patriotism narrowed into section- alism. He became unteachable, incapable of considering an opinion opposite to his own, or even a fact that did not favor it. Exempt by his bodily constitution from all temptation to physical DANIEL WEBSTER. 57 excesses, his body was worn out by the intense, unhealthy work- ing of his mind. False opinions falsely held and intolerantly maintained were the debauchery that sharpened the lines of his face, and converted his voice into a bark. Peace, health, and growth early became impossible to him, for there was a canker in the heart of the man. His once not dishonorable desire of the Presidency became at last an infuriate lust after it, which his natural sincerity compelled him to reveal even while wrathfully denying it. He considered that he had been defrauded of the prize, and he had some reason for thinking so. Some men avenge their wrongs by the pistol, others by invective ; but the only weapons which this man could wield were abstract proposi- tions. From the hills of South Carolina he hurled paradoxes at General Jackson, and appealed from the dicta of Mrs. Eaton's drawing-room to a hair-splitting theory of States' Rights. Fif- teen hundred thousand armed men have since sprung up from those harmless-looking dragon's teeth, so recklessly sown in the hot Southern soil. Of the three men whom we have named, Daniel Webster was incomparably the most richly endowed by nature. In his life- time it was impossible to judge him aright. His presence usu- ally overwhelmed criticism ; his intimacy always fascinated it. It so happened, that he grew to his full stature and attained his utmost development in a community where human nature ap- pears to be undergoing a process of diminution, — where people are smaller-boned, less muscular, more nervous, and more sus- ceptible than their ancestors. He possessed, in consequence, an enormous physical magnetism, as we term it, over his fellow- citizens, apart from the natural influence of his talents and un- derstanding. Fidgety men were quieted in his presence, women were spellbound by it, and the busy, anxious public contemplated his majestic calm with a feeling of relief, as well as admiration. Large numbers of people in New England, for many years, re- posed upon Daniel Webster. He represented to them the maj- esty and the strength of the government of the United States. He gave them a sense of safety. Amid the flighty politics of the time and the loud insincerities of Washington, there seemed one 3* 58 DANIEL WEBSTER. solid thing in America, so long as he sat in an arm-chair of the Senate-chamber. When he appeared in State Street, slowly pacing, with an arm behind him, business was brought to an ab- solute stand-still. As the whisper passed along, the windows filled with clerks, pen in mouth, peering out to catch a glimpse of the man whom they had seen fifty times before ; while the bankers and merchants hastened forth to give him salutation, or exchange a passing word, happy if they could but catch his eye. At home, and in a good mood, he was reputed to be as entertaining a man as New England ever held, — a gambolling, jocund leviathan out on the sea-shore, and in the library overflowing with every kind of knowledge that can be acquired without fatigue, and received without preparation. Mere celebrity, too, is dazzling to some minds. While, therefore, this imposing person lived among us, he was blindly worshipped by many, blindly hated by some, calmly considered by very few. To this hour he is a great in- fluence in the United States. Perhaps, with the abundant ma- terial now accessible, it is not too soon to attempt to ascertain how far he was worthy of the estimation in which his fellow- citizens held him, and what place he ought to hold in the esteem of posterity. At least, it can never be unpleasing to Americans to recur to the most interesting specimen of our kind that has lived in America since Franklin. He could not have been born in a better place, nor of better stock, nor at a better time, nor reared in circumstances more fa- vorable to harmonious development. He grew up in the Swit- zerland of America. From a hill on his father's New Hampshire farm, he could see most of the noted summits of New England. Granite-topped Kearsarge stood out in bold relief near by ; Mount Washington and its attendant peaks, not yet named, bounded the northern horizon like a low, silvery cloud ; and the principal heights of the Green Mountains, rising near the Connecticut River, were clearly visible. The Merrimack, most serviceable of rivers, begins its course a mile or two oflf, formed by the union of two mountain torrents. Among those hills, high up, sometimes near the summits, lakes are found, broad, deep, and still ; and down the sides run innumerable rills, which DANIEL WEBSTER. 59 form those noisy brooks that rush along the bottom of the hills, where now the roads wind along, shaded by the mountain, and enlivened by the music of the waters. Among these hills there are, here and there, expanses of level country large enough for a farm, with the addition of some fields upon the easier acclivities and woodlands higher up. There was one field of a hundred acres upon Captain Webster's mountain farm so level that a lamb could be seen on any part of it from the windows of the house. Every tourist knows that region now, — that wide, bil- lowy expanse of dark mountains and vivid green fields, dotted with white farm-houses, and streaked with silvery streams. It was rougher, seventy years ago, secluded, hardly accessible, the streams unbridged, the roads of primitive formation ; but the worst of the rough work had been done there, and the production of superior human beings had become possible, before the "Web- ster boys were born. Daniel Webster's father was the strong man of his neighbor- hood ; the very model of a republican citizen and hero, — stal- wart, handsome, brave, and gentle. Ebenezer Webster inherited no worldly advantages. Sprung from a line of New Hampshire farmers, he was apprenticed, in his thirteenth year, to another New Hampshire farmer ; and when he had served his time, he enlisted as a private soldier in the old French war, and came back from the campaigns about Lake George a captain. He never went to school. Like so many other New England boys, he learned what is essential for the carrying on of business in the chimney-corner, by the light of the fire. He possessed one beautiful accomplishment : he was a grand reader. Unlettered as he was, he greatly enjoyed the more lofty compositions of poets and orators ; and his large, sonorous voice enabled him to read them with fine effect. His sons read in his manner, even to his rustic pronunciation of some words. Daniel's calm, clear- cut rendering of certain noted passages — favorites in his early home — was all his father's. There is a pleasing tradition in the neighborhood, of the teamsters who came to Ebenezer Webster's mill saying to one another, when they had discharged their load and tied their horses, " Come, let us go in, and hear little Dan 60 DANIEL WEBSTER. read a psalm." The French war ended, Captain Webster, in compensation for his services, received a grant of land in the mountain wilderness at the head of the Merrimack, where, as miller and farmer, he lived and reared his family. The Revolutionary War summoned this noble yeoman to arms once more. He led forth his neighbors to the strife, and fought at their head, with his old rank of captain, at White Plains and at Bennington, and served valiantly through the war. From that time to the end of his life, though much trusted and employed by his fellow-citizens as legislator, magistrate, and judge, he lived but for one object, — the education and advancement of his children. All men were poor then in New Hampshire, compared with the condition of their descendants. Judge Webster was a poor, and even embar- rassed man, to the day of his death. The hardships he had endured as soldier and pioneer made him, as he said, an old man before his time. Rheumatism bent his form, once so erect and vigorous. Black care subdued his spirits, once so joyous and elastic. Such were the fathers of fair New England. This strong-minded, uncultured man was a Puritan and a Federalist, — a catholic, tolerant, and genial Puritan, an intol- erant and almost bigoted Federalist. Washington, Adams, and Hamilton were the civilians highest in his esteem ; the good Jefferson he dreaded and abhorred. The French Revolution was mere blackness and horror to him ; and when it assumed the form of Napoleon Bonaparte, his heart sided passionately with England in her struggle to extirpate it. His boys were in the fullest sympathy with him in all his opinions and feelings. They, too, were tolerant and untheological Puritans ; they, too, were most strenuous Federalists ; and neither of them ever recovered from their father's influence, nor advanced much beyond him in their fundamental beliefs. Readers have, doubtless, remarked, in Mr. Webster's oration upon Adams and Jefferson, how the stress of the eulogy falls upon Adams, while cold and scant jus- tice is meted out to the greatest and wisest of our statesmen. It was Ebenezer Webster who spoke that day, with the more melo- dious voice of his son. There is a tradition in New Hampshire that Judge Webster fell sick on a journey in a town of Republi- DAXIEL WEBSTER. 61 can politics, and besought the doctor to help him speedily on his way home, saying that he was born a Federalist, had lived a Federalist, and could not die in peace in any but a Federalist town. Among the ten children of this sturdy patriot and partisan, eight were ordinary mortals, and two most extraordinary, — Eze- kiel, born in 1780, and Daniel, born in 1782, — the youngest of his boys. Some of the elder children were even less than ordi- nary. Elderly residents of the neighborhood speak of one half- brother of Daniel and Ezekiel as penurious and narrow ; and the letters of others of the family indicate very plain, good, com- monplace people. But these two, the sons of their father's prime, inherited all his grandeur of form and beauty of countenance, his taste for high literature, along with a certain energy of mind that came to them, by some unknown law of nature, from their father's mother. From her Daniel derived his jet-black hair and eyes, and his complexion of burnt gunpowder; though all the rest of the children except one were remarkable for fairness of complexion, and had sandy hair. Ezekiel, who was considered the handsomest man in the United States, had a skin of singular fairness, and light hair. He is vividly remembered in New Hampshire for his marvellous beauty of form and face, his courtly and winning manners, the weight and majesty of his presence. He was a signal refutation of Dr. Holmes's theory, that grand manners and high breeding are the result of several generations of culture. Until he was nineteen, this peerless gentleman worked on a rough mountain farm on the outskirts of civilization, as his ancestors had for a hundred and fifty years before him ; but he was refined to the tips of his finger-nails and to the buttons of his coat. Like his more famous brother, he had an artist's eye for the becoming in costume, and a keen sense for all the proprie- ties and decorums both of public and private life. Limited in his view by the narrowness of his provincial sphere, as well as by inherited prejudices, he was a better man and citizen than his brother, without a touch of his genius. Nor was that half- brother of Daniel, who had the black hair and eyes and gunpow- der skin, at all like Daniel, or equal to him in mental power. 62 DANIEL WEBSTER. There is nothing in our literature more pleasing than the glimpses it affords of the early life of these two brothers ; — Eze- kiel, robust, steady-going, persevering, self-denying ; Daniel, careless of work, eager for play, often sick, always slender and weakly, and regarded rather as a burden upon the family than a help to it. His feebleness early habituated him to being a re- cipient of aid and favor, and it decided his destiny. It has been the custom in New England, from the earliest time, to bring up one son of a prosperous family to a profession, and the one se- lected was usually the boy who seemed least capable of earning a livelihood by manual labor. Ebenezer "Webster, heavily burdened with responsibility all his life long, had most ardently desired to give his elder sons a better education that he had himself enjoyed, but could not. When Daniel was a boy, his large family was beginning to lift his load a little ; the country was filling up ; his farm was more productive, and he felt somewhat more at his ease. His sickly youngest son, because he was sickly, and only for that reason, he chose from his numerous brood to send to an academy, designing to make a schoolmaster of him. We have no reason to believe that any of the family saw anything extraordinary in the boy. Except that he read aloud unusually well, he had given no sign of particular talent, unless it might be that he ex- celled in catching trout, shooting squirrels, and fighting cocks. His mother, observing his love of play and his equal love of books, said he " would come to something or nothing, she could not tell which " ; but his father, noticing his power over the sym- pathies of others, and comparing him with his bashful brother, used to remark, that he had fears for Ezekiel, but that Daniel would assuredly make his way in the world. It is certain that the lad himself was totally unconscious of possessing extraordi- nary talents, and indulged no early dream of greatness. He tells us himself, that he loved but two things in his youth, — play and reading. The rude schools which he trudged two or three miles in the winter every day to attend, taught him scarcely any- thing. His father's saw-mill, he used to say, was the real school of his youth. When he had set the saw and turned on the water, there would be fifteen minutes of tranquillity before DANIEL WEBSTER. 63 the log again required his attention, during which he sat and absorbed knowledge. " We had so few books," he records in the exquisite fragment of autobiography he has left us, " that to read them once or twice was nothing. We thought they were all to be got by heart." How touching the story, so well known, of the mighty struggle and long self-sacrifice it cost this family to get the youth through college ! The whole expense did not average one hundred and fifty dollars a year ; but it seemed to the boy so vast and unat- tainable a good, that, when his father announced his purpose to attempt it, he was completely overcome ; his head was dizzy ; his tongue was paralyzed ; he could only press his father's hands and shed tears. Slender indeed was his preparation for Dart- mouth. From the day when he took his first Latin lesson to that on which he entered college was thirteen months. He could translate Cicero's orations with some ease, and make out with difficulty and labor the easiest sentences of the Greek Reader, and that was the whole of what was called his " preparation " for college. In June, 1797, he did not know the Greek alphabet; in August of the same year he was admitted to the Freshman Class of Dartmouth on engaging to supply his deficiencies by extra study. Neither at college nor at any time could Daniel Webster b-' properly called a student, and well he knew it. Many a time ho has laughed, in his jovial, rollicking manner, at the preposterous reputation for learning a man can get by bringing out a fragment of curious knowledge at the right moment at college. He was an absorbent of knowledge, never a student. The Latin of Cicero and Virgil was congenial and easy to him, and he learned more of it than the required portion. But even in Latin, he tells us, he was excelled by some of his own class ; and " his attainments were not such," he adds, " as told for much in the recitation-room." Greek he never enjoyed : his curiosity was never awakened on the edge of that boundless contiguity of interesting knowledge, and he only learned enough Greek to escape censure. He said, forty years after, in an after-dinner speech : " When I was at school I felt exceedingly obliged to 64 DANIEL WEBSTER. Homer's messengers for the exact literal fidelity with which they delivered their messages. The seven or eight lines of good Homeric Greek in which they had received the commands of Agamemnon or Achilles they recited to whomsoever the message was to be carried ; and as they repeated them verbatim, some- times twice or thrice, it saved me the trouble of learning so much Greek." It was not at " school " that he had this experience, but at Dartmouth College. For mathematics, too, he had not the slightest taste. He humorously wrote to a fellow-student, soon after leaving college, that " all that he knew about conterminous arches or evanescent subtenses might be collected on the pupil of a gnat's eye without making him wink." At college, in fact, he was simply an omnivorous reader, studying only so much as to pass muster in the recitation-room. Every indication we possess of his college life, as well as his own repeated assertions, confirms the conclusion that Nature had formed him to use the products of other men's toil, not to add to the common fund. Those who are conversant with college life know very well what it means when a youth does not take to Greek, and has an aversion to mathematics. Such a youth may have immense talent, and give splendid expression to the sentiments of his countrymen, but he is not likely to be one of the priceless few of the human race who dicover truth or advance opinion. It is the energetic, the origi- nating minds that are susceptible to the allurements of difficulty. On the other hand, Daniel Webster had such qualities as made every one feel that he was the first man in the College. Tall, gaunt, and sallow, Avith an incomparable forehead, and those cav- ernous and brilliant eyes of his, he had much of the large and tranquil presence which was so important an element of his power over others at all periods of his life. His letters of this time, as well as the recollections of his fellow-students, show him the easy, humorous, rather indolent and strictly correct " good-fellow," whom professors and companions equally relished. He browsed much in the College library, and had the habit of bringing to bear upon the lesson of the hour the information gathered in his miscellaneous reading, — a practice that much enlivens the mo- notony of recitation. The half-dozen youths of his particular set, DANIEL WEBSTER. 65 it appears, plumed themselves upon resembling the early Chris- tians in having all things in common. The first to rise in the morning — and he must have been an early riser indeed who was up before Daniel Webster — " dressed himself in the best which the united apartments afforded " ; the next made the best selection from what remained ; and the last was happy if he found rags enough to justify his appearance in the chapel. The relator of this pleasant reminiscence adds, that he was once the possessor of an eminently respectable beaver hat, a costly article of resplendent lustre. It was missing one day, could not be found, and was given up for lost. Several weeks after " friend Dan " returned from a distant town, where he had been teaching- school, wearing the lost beaver, and relieving its proprietor from the necessity of covering his head with a battered and long-dis- carded hat of felt. How like the Daniel "Webster of later years, who never could acquire the sense of meiim and tuum, supposed to be the basis of civilization ! Mr. Webster always spoke slightingly of his early oratorical efforts, and requested Mr. Everett, the editor of his works, not to search them out. He was not just to the productions of his youth, if we may judge from the Fourth-of-July oration which he delivered in 1800, when he was a Junior at Dartmouth, eighteen years of age. This glowing psalm of the republican David is perfectly characteristic, and entirely worthy of him. The times that tried men's souls, — how recent and vivid they were to the sons of Ebenezer Webster, who had led forth from the New- Hampshire hills the neighbors at whose firesides Ezekiel and Daniel had listened, open-mouthed, to the thousand forgotten in- cidents of the war. Their professors of history were old John Bowen, who had once been a prisoner with the Indians ; Robert Wise, who had sailed round the world and fought in the Revolu- tion on both sides ; George Bayly, a pioneer, who saw the first tree felled in Northern New Hampshire ; women of the neigh- borhood, who had heard the midnight yell of savages ; and, above all, their own lion-hearted father, who had warred with French- , men, Indians, wild nature, British troops, and French ideas. " 0," wrote Daniel once, " I shall never hear such story -telling E Q6 DANIEL WEBSTER. again ! " It was not in the cold pages of Hildreth, nor in the brief summaries of school-books, that this imaginative, sympathet- ic youth had learned that part of the political history of the United States — from 1787 to 1800 — which will ever be its most interesting portion. He learned it at town-meetings, in the newspapers, at his father's house, among his neighbors, on elec- tion days ; he learned it as an intelligent youth, with a passion- ately loyal father and mother, learned the history of the late war, and is now learning the agonizing history of " reconstruction." This oration is the warm and modest expression of all that the receptive and unsceptical student had imbibed and felt during the years of his formation, who saw before him a large company of Revolutionary soldiers and a great multitude of Federalist parti- sans. He saluted the audience as " Countrymen, brethren, and fathers." The oration was chiefly a rapid, exulting review of the history of the young Republic, with an occasional pomposity, and a few expressions caught from the party discussions of the day. It is amusing to hear this young Federalist of 1800 speak of Napoleon Bonaparte as " the gasconading pilgrim of Egypt," and the government of France as the " supercilious, five-headed Di- rectory," and the President of the United States as " the firm, the wise, the inflexible Adams, who with steady hand draws the dis- guising veil from the intrigues of foreign enemies and the plots of domestic foes." It is amusing to read, as the utterance of Daniel "Webster, that " Columbia is now seated in the forum of na- tions, and the empires of the world are amazed at the bright efful- gence of her glory." But it is interesting to observe, also, that at eighteen, not less fervently than at forty-eight, he felt the impor- tance of the message with which he was charged to the American people, — the necessity of the Union, and the value of the Con- stitution as the uniting bond. The following passage has, per- haps, more in it of the Webster of 1830 than any other in the oration. The reader will notice the similarity between one part of it and the famous passage in the Bunker Hill oration, begin- ning " Venerable men," addressed to the survivors of the Revo- lution. " Thus, friends and citizens, did the kind hand of overruling Provi- DANIEL WEBSTER. 67 denee conduct us, through toils, fatigues, and dangers, to independence and peace. If piety be the rational exercise of the human soul, if re- ligion be not a chimera, and if the vestiges of heavenly assistance are clearly traced in those events which mark the annals of our nation, it becomes us on this day, in consideration of the great things which have been done for us, to render the tribute of unfeigned thanks to that God who superintends the universe, and holds aloft the scale that weighs the destinies of nations. " The conclusion of the Revolutionary War did not accomplish the entire achievements of our countrymen. Their military character was then, indeed, sufficiently established; but the time was coming which should prove their political sagacity, their ability to govern them- selves. " No sooner was peace restored with England, (the first grand article of which was the acknowledgment of our independence,) than the old system of Confederation, dictated at first by necessity, and adopted for the purposes of the moment, was found inadequate to the government of an extensive empire. Under a full conviction of this, we then saw the people of these States engaged in a transaction which is undoubtedly the greatest approximation towards human perfection the political world ever yet witnessed, and which, perhaps, will forever stand in the history of mankind without a parallel. A great republic, composed of different States, whose interest in all respects could not be perfectly compatible, then came deliberately forward, discarded on' 1 , system of government, and adopted another, without the loss of on.; man's blood. " There is not a single government now existing in Europe which is not based in usurpation, and established, if established at all, by the sacrifice of thousands. But in the adoption of our present sys- tem of jurisprudence, we see the powers necessary for government voluntarily flowing from the people, their only proper origin, and directed to the public good, their only proper object. " With peculiar propriety, we may now felicitate ourselves on that happy form of mixed government under which we live. The advan- tages resulting to the citizens of the Union are utterly incalculable, and the day when it was received by a majority of the States shall stand on the catalogue of American anniversaries second to none but the birthday of independence. " In consequence of the adoption of our present system of govern- ment, and the virtuous manner in which it has been administered by a Washington and an Adams, we are this day in the enjoyment of peace, 68 DANIEL WEBSTER. ■while war devastates Europe ! We can now sit down beneath tl shadow of the olive, while her cities blaze, her streams run purp] with blood, and her fields glitter with a forest of bayonets ! Th citizens of America can this day throng the temples of freedom, an: renew their oaths of fealty to independence ; while Holland, ou once sister republic, is erased from the catalogue of nations ; whiL Venice is destroyed, Italy ravaged, and Switzerland — the one' happy, the once united, the once flourishing Switzerland — lie bleeding at every pore ! " He need not have been ashamed of this speech, despite thi lumbering bombast of some of its sentences. All that made bin estimable as a public man is contained in it, — the sentiment ot nationality, and a clear sense of the only means by which th< United States can remain a nation ; namely, strict fidelity to tin Constitution as interpreted by the authority itself creates, anc modified in the way itself appoints. "We have never read th( production of a youth which was more prophetic of the man thai this. It was young New England that spoke through him or that occasion ; and in all the best part of his life he nevei touched a strain which New England had not inspired, or could not reach. His success at college giving him ascendency at home, he employed it for the benefit of his brother in a manner which few sons would have dared, and no son ought to attempt. His father, now advanced in years, infirm, " an old man before his time ,: through hardship and toil, much in debt, depending chiefly upon his salary of four hundred dollars a year as Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, and heavily taxed to maintain Daniel in col- lege, had seen all his other sons married and settled except Ezekiel, upon whom he leaned as the staff of his declining years, and the main dependence of his wife and two maiden daughters. Nevertheless, Daniel, after a whole night of consultation with his brother, urged the old man to send Ezekiel to college also. The fond and generous father replied, that he had but little property, and it would take all that little to carry another son through col- lege to a profession ; but he lived only for his children, and, for his own part, he was willing to run the risk ; but there was the mother and two unmarried sisters, to whom the risk was far more DANIEL WEBSTER. 69 serious. If they consented, he was willing. The mother said : * I have lived long in the world, and have been happy in my children. If Daniel and Ezekiel will promise to take care of me in my old age, I will consent to the sale of all our property at once, and they may enjoy the benefit of that which remains after our debts are paid." Upon hearing this, all the family, we are told, were dissolved in tears, and the old man gave his assent. This seems hard, — two stout and vigorous young men willing to risk their aged parents' home and dignity for such a purpose, or for any purpose ! In the early days, however, there was a sin- gular unity of feeling and interest in a good New England family, and there were opportunities for professional men which rendered the success of two such lads as these nearly certain, if they lived to establish themselves. Nevertheless, it was too much to ask, and more than Daniel Webster would have asked if he had been properly alive to the rights of others. Ezekiel shouldered his bundle, trudged off to school, where he lived and studied at the cost of one dollar a week, worked his way to the position of the second lawyer in New Hampshire, and would early have gone to Congress but for his stanch, inflexible Federalism. Daniel Webster, schoolmaster and law-student, was assuredly one of the most interesting of characters. Pinched by poverty, as he tells us, till his very bones ached, eking out his income by a kind of labor that he always loathed (copying deeds), his shoes letting in, not water merely, but " pebbles and stones," — father, brothei-, and himself sometimes all moneyless together, all dunned at the same time, and writing to one another for aid, — he was nevertheless as jovial a young fellow as any in New England. How merry and affectionate his letters to his young friends ! He writes to one, soon after leaving college : " You will natu- rally inquire how I prosper in the article of cash ; finely, finely ! I came here in January with a horse, watch, etc., and a few ras- cally counters in my pocket. Was soon obliged to sell my horse, and live on the proceeds. Still straitened for cash, I sold my watch, and made a shift to get home, where my friends supplied me with another horse and another watch. My horse is sold again, and my watch goes, I expect, this week ; thus you see 70 DANIEL WEBSTER. how I lay up cash." How like him ! To another college friend, James Hervey Bingham, whom he calls, by turns, " brother Jemmy," "Jemmy Hervey," and "Bingham," he discourses thus: " Perhaps you thought, as I did, that a dozen dollars would slide out of the pocket in a Commencement jaunt much easier than they would slide in again after you got home. That was the ex- act reason why I was not there I flatter myself that none of my friends ever thought me greatly absorbed in the sin of avarice, yet I assure you, Jem, that in these days of poverty I look upon a round dollar with a great deal of complacency. These rascal dollars are so necessary to the comfort of life, that next to a fine wife they are most essential, and their acquisition an object of prime importance. O Bingham, how blessed it would be to retire with a decent, clever bag of Rixes to a pleas- ant country town, and follow one's own inclination without being shackled by the duties of a profession ! " To the same friend, whom he now addresses as " dear Squire," he announces joyfully a wondrous piece of luck : " My expenses [to Albany] were all amply paid, and on my return I put my hand in my pocket and found one hundred and twenty dear delightfuls ! Is not that good luck ? And these dear delightfuls were, 'pon honor, all my own ; yes, every dog of them ! " To which we may add from an- other source, that they were straightway transferred to his father, to whom they were dear delightfuls indeed, for he was really getting to the end of his tether. The schoolmaster lived, it appears, on the easiest terms with his pupils, some of whom were older than himself. He tells a story of falling in with one of them on his journey to school, who was mounted " on the ugliest horse I ever saw or heard of, except Sancho Panza's pacer." The schoolmaster having two good horses, the pupil mounted' one of them, strapped his bag to his own forlorn animal and drove him before, where his odd cait and frequent stumblings kept them amused. At length, arriving at a deep and rapid river, " this satire on the animal creation, as if to revenge herself on us for our sarcasms, plunged into the river, then very high by the freshet, and was wafted down the current like a bag of oats ! I could hardly sit on my horse for DANIEL WEBSTER. 71 laughter. I am apt to laugh at the vexations of my friends. The fellow, who was of my own age, and my room-mate, half checked the current by oaths as big as lobsters, and the old Rosi- nante, who was all the while much at her ease, floated up among the willows far below on the opposite side of the river." At the same time he was an innocent young man. If he had any wild oats in his composition, they were not sown in the days of his youth. Expecting to pass his life as a country lawyer, having scarcely a premonition of his coming renown, we find him enjoying the simple country sports and indulging in the simple village ambitions. He tried once for the captaincy of a company of militia, and was not elected ; he canvassed a whole regiment to get his brother the post of adjutant, and failed. At one time he came near abandoning the law, as too high and perilous for him, and settling down as schoolmaster and clerk of a court. The assurance of a certain six hundred dollars a year, a house, and a piece of land, with the prospect of the clerkship by and by, was so alluring to him that it required all the influence of his family and friends to make him reject the offer. Even then, in the flush and vigor of his youth, he was led. So was it always. He was never a leader, but always a follower. Nature made him very large, but so stinted him in propelling force, that it is doubtful if he had ever emerged from obscurity if his friends had not urged him on. His modesty in these innocent days is most touching to witness. After a long internal conflict, he resolved, in his twentieth year, to "make one more trial" at mastering the law. " If I prosecute the profession, I pray God to fortify me against its temptations. To the wind I dismiss those light hopes of eminence which ambition inspired and vanity fostered. To be ' honest, to be capable, to be faithful ' to my client and my con- science, I earnestly hope will be my first endeavor." How ex- ceedingly astonished would these affectionate young friends have been, if they could have looked forward forty years, and seen the timid law-student Secretary of State, and his ardent young com- rade a clerk in his department. They seemed equals in 1802; in 1845, they had grown so far apart, that the excellent Bingham writes to Webster as to a demigod. 72 DANIEL WEBSTER. In these pleasant early letters of Daniel Webster there are a thousand evidences of a good heart and of virtuous habits, but not one of a superior understanding. The total absence of the sceptical spirit marks the secondary mind. For a hundred and fifty years, no young man of a truly eminent intellect has ac- cepted his father's creeds without having first called them into question ; and this must be so in periods of transition. The glorious light which has been coming upon Christendom for the last two hundred years, and which is now beginning to pervade the remotest provinces of it, never illumined the mind of Daniel Webster. Upon coming of age, he joined the Congregational Church, and was accustomed to open his school with an extem- pore prayer. He used the word " Deist " as a term of reproach ; he deemed it " criminal " in Gibbon to write his fifteenth and sixteenth chapters, and spoke of that author as a " learned, proud, ingenious, foppish, vain, self-deceived man," who " from Protes- tant connections deserted to the Church of Rome, and thence to the faith of Tom Paine." And he never delivered himself from this narrowness and ignorance. In the time of his celebrity, he preferred what Sir Walter Scott called " the genteeler religion of the two," the Episcopal. In his old age, his idea of a proper sermon was incredibly narrow and provincial. He is reported to have said, late in life : — " Many of the ministers of the present day take their text from St. Paul, and preach from the newspapers. When they do so, I prefer to enjoy my own thoughts rather than to listen. I want my pastor to come to me in the spirit of the Gospel, saying, ' You are mortal ! your probation is brief; your work must be done speedily; you are im- mortal too. You are hastening to the bar of God ; the Judge standeth before the door.' When I am thus admonished, I have no disposition to muse or to sleep." This does not accord with what is usually observed in our churches, where sermons of the kind which Mr. Webster extolled dispose many persons to sleep, though not to muse. In the same unquestioning manner, he imbibed his father's political prejudices. We hear this young Federalist call the Republican party "the Jacobins," just as the reactionists and DANIEL WEBSTER. 73 tories of the present day speak of the present Republican party as "the radicals." It is amusing to hear him, in 1802, predict the speedy restoration to power of a party that was never again to ta&te its sweets. " Jacobinism and iniquity," he wrote in his twentieth year, " are so allied in signification, that the latter always follows the former, just as in grammar ' the accusative case follows the transitive verb.' " He speaks of a young friend as " too honest for a Democrat." As late as his twenty-second year, he was wholly unreconciled to Napoleon, and still wrote with truly English scorn of " Gallic tastes and Gallic principles." There is a fine burst in one of his letters of 1804, when he had been propelled by his brother to Boston to finish his law studies: — " Jerome, the brother of the Emperor of the Gauls, is here ; every day you may see him whisking along Cornhill, with the true French air, with his wife by his side. The lads say that they intend to prevail on American misses to receive company in future after the manner of Jerome's wife, that is, in bed. The gentlemen of Boston (i. e. we Feds) treat Monsieur with cold and distant respect. They feel, and every honest man feels, indignant at seeing this lordly grasshopper, this puppet in prince's clothes, dashing through the American cities, luxuri- ously rioting on the property of Dutch mechanics or Swiss peasants." This last sentence, written when he was twenty-two years old, is the first to be found in his published letters which tells any- thing of the fire that was latent in him. He was of slow growth ; he was forty-eight years of age before his powers had reached their full development. When he had nearly completed his studies for the bar, he was again upon the point of abandoning the laborious career of a law- yer for a life of obscurity and ease. On this occasion, it was the clerkship of his father's court, salary fifteen hundred dollars a year, that tempted him. He jumped at the offer, which promised an immediate competency for the whole family, pinched and anx- ious for so many years. He had no thought but to accept it. With the letter in his hand, and triumphant joy in his face, he communicated the news to Mr. Gore, his instructor in the law ; thinking of nothing, he tells us, but of " rushing to the immediate enjoyment of the pi-offered office." Mr. Gore, however, exhibited 4 74 DANIEL WEBSTER. a provoking coolness on the subject. He said it was very civil in the judges to offer such a compliment to a brother on the bench, and, of course, a respectful letter of acknowledgment must be sent. The glowing countenance of the young man fell at these most unexpected and unwelcome words. They were, to use his own language, " a shower-bath of ice-water." The old lawyer, observing his crestfallen condition, reasoned seriously with him, and persuaded him, against his will, to continue his preparation for the bar. At every turning-point of his life, whenever he came to a parting of the ways, one of which must be chosen and the other forsaken, he required an impulse from without to push him into the path he was to go. Except once ! Once in his long public life, he seemed to venture out alone on an unfamiliar road, and lost himself. Usually, when great powers are conferred on a man, there is also given him a strong propensity to exercise them, sufficient to carry him through all difficulties to the suitable sphere. Here, on the contrary, there was a Great Eastern with only a Cunarder's engine, and it required a tug to get the great ship round to her course. Admitted to the bar in his twenty-third year, he dutifully went home to his father, and opened an office in a New Hampshire vil- lage near by, resolved never again to leave the generous old man while he lived. Before leaving Boston, he wrote to his friend Bingham, " If I am not earning my bread and cheese in exactly nine days after my admission, I shall certainly be a bankrupt " ; — and so, indeed, it proved. With great difficulty, he " hired " eighty-five dollars as a capital to begin business with, and this great sum was immediately lost in its transit by stage. To any other young man in his situation, such a calamity would have been, for the moment, crushing ; but this young man, indifferent to meum as to tuum, informs his brother that he can in no con- ceivable way replace the money, cannot therefore pay for the books he had bought, believes he is earning his daily bread, and as to the loss, he has " no uneasy sensations on that account" He concludes his letter with an old song, beginning, " Fol de dol, dol de dol, di dol, I'll never make money my idol." DANIEL WEBSTER. 75 In the New Hampshire of 1805 there was no such thing pos- sible as leaping at once into a lucrative practice, nor even of slowly acquiring it. A country lawyer who gained a thousand dollars a year was among the most successful, and the leader of the bar in New Hampshire could not earn two thousand. The chief employment of Daniel Webster, during the first year or two of his practice, was collecting debts due in New Hampshire to merchants in Boston. His first tin sign has been preserved to the present day, to attest by its minuteness and brevity the . humble expectations of its proprietor. " D. Webster, Attorney," is the inscription it bears. The old Court-House still stands in which he conducted his first suit, before his own father as pre- siding judge. Old men in that part of New Hampshire were liv- ing until within these few years, who remembered well seeing this tall, gaunt, and large-eyed young lawyer rise slowly, as though scarcely able to get upon his feet, and giving to every one the impression that he would soon be obliged to sit down from mere physical weakness, and saying to his father, for the first and last time, " May it please your Honor." The sheriff of the coun- ty, who was also a Webster, used to say that he felt ashamed to see the family represented at the bar by so lean and feeble a young man. The tradition is, that he acquitted himself so we-1 on this occasion that the sheriff was satisfied, and clients came, with their little suits and smaller fees, in considerable numbers, to the office of D. Webster, Attorney, who thenceforth in the country round went by the name of " All-eyes." His father nev- er heard him speak again. He lived to see Daniel in successful practice, and Ezekiel a student of law, and died in 180G, prema- turely old. Daniel Webster practised three years in the country, and then, resigning his business to his brother, established him- self at Portsmouth, the seaport of New Hampshire, then a place of much foreign commerce. Ezekiel had had a most desperate struggle with poverty. At one time, when the family, as Daniel observed, was " heinously unprovided," we see the much-endur- ing " Zeke " teaching an Academy by day, an evening school for sailors, and keeping well up with his class in college besides. But these preliminary troubles were now at an end, and both 76 DANIEL WEBSTER. the brothers took the places won by so much toil and self- sacrifice. Those are noble old towns on the New England coast, the commerce of which Boston swallowed up forty years ago, while it left behind many a large and liberally provided old mansion, with a family in it enriched by ventures to India and China. Strangers in Portsmouth are still struck by the largeness and elegance of the residences there, and wonder how such establish- • ments can be maintained in a place that has little "visible means of support." It was while Portsmouth was an important seaport that Daniel Webster learned and practised law there, and acquired some note as a Federalist politician. The once celebrated Dr. Buckminster was the minister of the Congregational church at Portsmouth then. One Sunday morn- ing in 1808, his eldest daughter sitting alone in the minister's pew, a strange gentleman was shown into it, whose appearance and demeanor strongly arrested her attention. The slenderness of his frame, the pale yellow of his complexion, and the raven blackness of his hair, seemed only to bring out into grander relief his ample forehead, and to heighten the effect of his deep- set, brilliant eyes. At this period of his life there was an air of delicacy and refinement about his face, joined to a kind of strength that women can admire, without fearing. Miss Buck- minster told the family, when she went home from church, that there had been a remarkable person with her in the pew, — one that she was sure had " a marked character for good or evil." A few days after, the remarkable person came to live in the neigh- borhood, and was soon introduced to the minister's family as Mr. Daniel "Webster, from Franklin, New Hampshire, who was about to open a law office in Portsmouth. He soon endeared himself to every person in the minister's circle, and to no one more than to the minister himself, who, among other services, taught him the art of preserving his health. The young man, like the old clergyman, was an early riser, up with the dawn in summer, and long before the dawn in winter ; and both were out of doors with the sun, each at one end of a long saw, cutting wood for an appe- tite. The joyous, uncouth singing and shouting of the new- DANIEL WEBSTER. 77 comer aroused the late sleepers. Then in to breakfast, where the homely, captivating humor of the young lawyer kept the table in a roar, and detained every inmate. " Never was there such an actor lost to the stage," Jeremiah Mason, his only rival at the New Hampshire bar, used to say, " as he would have made." Returning in the afternoon from court, fatigued and languid, his spirits rose again with food and rest, and the evening was another festival of conversation and reading. A few months after his settlement at Portsmouth he visited his native hills,, saying nothing respecting the object of his journey ; and re- turned with a wife, — that gentle and high-bred lady, a clergy- man's daughter, who was the chief source of the happiness of his happiest years, and the mother of all his children, fie im- proved in health, his form expanded, his mind grew, his talents ripened, his fame spread, during the nine years of his residence at this thriving and pleasant town. At Portsmouth, too, he had precisely that external stimulus to exertion which his large and pleasure-loving nature needed. Jeremiah Mason was, literally speaking, the giant of the Amer- ican bar, for he stood six feet seven inches in his stockings. Like Webster, he was the son of a valiant Revolutionary officer ; like "Webster, he was an hereditary Federalist ; like Webster, he had a great mass of brain : but his mind was more active and acquis- itive than AVebster's, and his nineteen years of arduous practice at the bar had stored his memory with knowledge and given him dexterity in the use of it. Nothing shows the eminence of Web- ster's talents more than this, that, very early in his Portsmouth career, he should have been regarded at the bar of New Hamp- shire as the man to be employed against Jeremiah Mason, and his only fit antagonist. Mason was a vigilant, vigorous opponent, — sure to be well up in the law and the facts of a cause, sure to detect a flaw in the argument of opposing counsel. It was in keen encounters with this wary and learned man that Daniel Webster learned his profession; and this he always acknowl- edged. "If," he said once in conversation, — " if anybody thinks I am somewhat familiar with the law on some points, and should be curious to know how it happened, tell him that Jeremiah 78 DANIEL WEBSTEK. Mason compelled me to study it. He was my master." It is honorable, too, to both of them, that, rivals as they were, they were fast and affectionate friends, each valuing in the other the qualities in which he was surpassed by him, and each sincerely believing that the other was the first man of his time and coun- try. "They say," in Portsmouth, that Mason did not shrink from remonstrating with his friend upon his carelessness with regard to money; but, finding the habit inveterate and the man irresistible, desisted. Webster himself says that two thousand dollars a year was all that the best practice in New Hampshire could be made to yield ; and that that was inadequate to the sup- port of his family of a wife and three little children. Two thousand dollars in Portsmouth, in 1812, was certainly equal, in purchasing power, to six thousand of the ineffectual things that now pass by the name of dollars ; and upon such an income large families in a country town contrive to live, ride, and save. He was a strenuous Federalist at Portsmouth, took a leading part in the public meetings of the party, and won great distinc- tion as its frequent Fourth-of-July orator. All those mild and economical measures by which Mr. Jefferson sought to keep the United States from being drawn into the roaring vortex of the great wars in Europe, he opposed, and favored the policy of preparing the country for defence, not by gunboats and embar- goes, but by a powerful navy of frigates and ships of the line. His Fourth-of-July orations, if we may judge of them by the fragments that have been found, show that his mind had strength- ened more than it had advanced. His style wonderfully improved from eighteen to twenty-five ; and he tells us himself why it did. He discovered, he says, that the value, as well as the force, of a sentence, depends chiefly upon its meaning, not its language ; and that great writing is that in which much is said in few words, and those words the simplest that will answer the purpose. Having made this notable discovery, he became a great eraser of adjectives, and toiled after simplicity and directness. Mr. Everett quotes a few sentences from his Fourth-of-July oration of 1806, when he was twenty-four, which shows an amazing advance upon the effort of his eighteenth year, quoted above : — DANIEL WEBSTER. 79 " Nothing is plainer than this : if we will have commerce, we must protect it. This country is commercial as well as agricultural. Indis- soluble bonds connect him who ploughs the land ivith him who ploughs the sea. Nature has placed us in a situation favorable to commercial pur- suits, and no government can alter the destination. Habits confirmed by two centuries are not to be changed. An immense portion of our property is on the waves. Sixty or eighty thousand of our most useful citizens are there, and are entitled to such protection from the govern- ment as their case requires." How different this compact directness from the tremendous fulmination of the Dartmouth junior, who said: — " Columbia stoops not to tyrants ; her spirit will never cringe to France ; neither a supercilious, five-headed Directory nor the gascon- ading pilgrim of Egypt will ever dictate terms to sovereign America. The thunder of our cannon shall insure the performance of our treaties, and fulminate destruction on Frenchmen, till the ocean is crimsoned with blood and gorged with pirates ! " The Fourth-of-July oration, which afterwards fell into some disrepute, had great importance in the earlier years of the Re- public, when Revolutionary times and perils were fresh in the recollection of the people. The custom arose of assigning this duty to young men covetous of distinction, and this led in time to the flighty rhetoric which made sounding emptiness and a Fourth-of-July oration synonymous terms. The feeling that was real and spontaneous in the sons of Revolutionary soldiers was sometimes feigned or exaggerated in the young law students of the next generation, who had merely read the history of the Revolution. But with all the faults of those compositions, they were eminently serviceable to the country. We believe that to them is to be attributed a considerable part of that patriotic feel- ing which, after a suspended animation of several years, awoke in the spring of 18G1 and asserted itself with such unexpected power, and which sustained the country during four years of a peculiarly disheartening war. How pleasant and spirit-stirring was a celebration of the Fourth of July as it was conducted in Webster's early day ! Wa trust the old customs will be revived and improved upon, and become universal. Nor is it any objec- 80 DANIEL WEBSTER. tion to the practice of having an oration, that the population is too large to be reached in that way ; for if only a thousand hear, a million may read. Nor ought we to object if the orator is a little more flowery and boastful than becomes an ordinary occa- sion. There is a time to exult ; there is a time to abandon our- selves to pleasant recollections and joyous hopes. Therefore, we say, let the young men reappear upon the platform, and show what metal they are made of by giving the best utterance they can to the patriotic feelings of the people on the national anniver- sary. The Republic is safe so long as we celebrate that day in the spirit of 1776 and 1861. At least we may assert that it was Mr. "Webster's Fourth-of- July orations, of which he delivered five in eleven years, that first made him known to the people of New Hampshire. At that period the two political parties could not unite in the cele- bration of the day, and accordingly the orations of Mr. Webster had much in them that could be agreeable only to Federalists. He was an occasional speaker, too, in those years, at meetings of Federalists, where his power as an orator was sometimes exerted most effectively. No speaker could be better adapted to a New England audience, accustomed from of old to weighty, argumen- tative sermons, delivered with deliberate, unimpassioned earnest- ness. There are many indications that a speech by Daniel Web- ster in Portsmouth in 1810 excited as much expectation and comment as a speech by the same person in the Senate twenty years after. But he was a mere Federalist partisan, — no more. It does not appear that he had anything to offer to his country- men beyond the stately expression of party issues ; and it was as a Federalist, pure and simple, that he was elected, in 1812, a member of the House of Representatives, after a keenly con- tested party conflict. His majority over the Republican candi- date was 2,546, — the whole number of voters being 34,648. The Federalists, from 1801 to 1825, were useful to the coun- try only as an Opposition, — just as the present Tory party in England can be only serviceable in its capacity of critic and hold- back. The Federalists under John Adams had sinned past for- giveness ; while the Republican party, strong in being right, in DANIEL WEBSTER. 81 the ability of its chiefs, in its alliance with Southern aristocrats, and in having possession of the government, was strong also in the odium and inconsistencies of its opponents. Nothing could shake the confidence of the people in the administration of Thomas Jefferson. But the stronger a party is, the more it needs an Opposition, — as we saw last winter in Washington, when the minority was too insignificant in numbers and ability to keep the too powerful majority from doing itself such harm as might have been fatal to it but for the President's well-timed antics. Next to a sound and able majority, the great need of a free country is a vigorous, vigilant, audacious, numerous minority. Better a factious and unscrupulous minority than none at all. The Fed- eralists, who could justly claim to have among them a very large proportion of the rich men and the educated men of the country, performed the humble but useful service of keeping an eye upon the measures of the administration, and finding fault with every one of them. Daniel Webster, however, was wont to handle only the large topics. While Mr. Jefferson was struggling to keep the peace with Great Britain, he censured the policy as timorous, costly, and ineffectual ; but when Mr. Madison declared war against that power, he deemed the act unnecessary and rash. His opposition to the war was never carried to the point of giving aid and comfort to the enemy ; it was such an opposition as patri- otic " War Democrats " exhibited during the late Rebellion, who thought the war might have been avoided, and ought to be con- ducted more vigorously, but nevertheless stood by their country without a shadow of swerving. He could boast, too, that from his boyhood to the outbreak of the war he had advocated the building of the very ships which gave the infant nation its first taste of warlike glory. The Re- publicans of that time, forgetful of what Paul Jones and others of Dr. Franklin's captains had done in the war of the Revolution, supposed that, because England had a thousand ships in commis- sion, and America only seventeen, therefore an American ship could not venture out of a harbor without being taken. We have often laughed at Colonel Benton's ludicrous confession of his own terrors on this subject. 4* r 82 DANIEL WEBSTER. " Political men," he says, "believed nothing could be done at sea but to lose the few vessels which we had ; that even cruising was out of the question. Of our seventeen vessels, the whole were in port but one ; and it was determined to keep them there, and the one at sea with them, if it had the luck to get in. I am under no obligation to make the admission, but I am free to acknowledge that I was one of those who supposed that there was no salvation for our seventeen men- of-war but to run them as far up the creek as possible, place them un- der the guns of batteries, and collect camps of militia about them to keep off the British. This was the policy at the day of the declara- tion of the war ; and I have the less concern to admit myself to have been participator in the delusion, because I claim the merit of having profited from experience, — happy if I could transmit the lesson to posterity. Two officers came to Washington, — Bainbridge and Stew- art. They spoke with Mr. Madison, and urged the feasibility of cruis- ing. One half of the whole number of the British men-of-war were under the class of frigates, consequently no more than matches for some of our seventeen ; the whole of her merchant marine (many thou- sands) were subject to capture. Here was a rich field for cruising ; and the two officers, for themselves and brothers, boldly proposed to enter it. " Mr. Madison had seen the efficiency of cruising and privateering, even against Great Britain, and in our then infantile condition, during the war of the Revolution ; and besides was a man of sense, and amen- able to judgment and reason. He listened to the two experienced and valiant officers ; and without consulting Congress, which perhaps would have been a fatal consultation (for multitude of counsellors is not the counsel for bold decision), reversed the policy which had been resolved upon ; and, in his supreme character of constitutional commander of the army and navy, ordered every ship that could cruise to get to sea as soon as possible. This I had from Mr. Monroe." This is a curious example of the blinding effect of partisan strife, and of the absolute need of an Opposition. It was the hereditary prejudice of the Republicans against the navy, as an " aristocratic " institution, and the hereditary love of the navy cherished by the Federalists as being something stable and Brit- ish, that enlivened the debates of the war. The Federalists had their way, but failed to win a partisan advantage from the fact, through their factious opposition to the military measures of the administration. Because the first attempt at the seizure of Can- DANIEL WEBSTER. 83 ada had failed through the incompetency of General Hull, which no wisdom of man could have foreseen, Daniel "Webster called upon the government to discontinue all further attempts on the land, and fight the war out on the sea. " Give up your futile projects of invasion," said he in 1814. "Extinguish the fires that blaze on your inland borders." " Unclench the iron grasp of your embargo." " With all the war of the enemy on your commerce, if you would cease to make war upon it yourselves, you would still have some commerce. That commerce would give you some revenue. Apply that revenue to the augmentation of your navy. That navy, in turn, will protect your commerce." In war time, however, there are two powers that have to do with the course of events ; and very soon the enemy, by his own great scheme of invasion, decided the policy of the United States. Every port was blockaded so effectively that a pilot-boat could not safely go out of sight of land, and a frigate was captured within sight of it. These vigilant blockaders, together with the threatening armament which finally attacked New Orleans, com- pelled every harbor to prepare for defence, and most effectually refuted Mr. Webster's speech. The " blaze of glory " with which the war ended at New Orleans consumed all the remaining pres- tige of the Federalist party, once so powerful, so respectable, and so arrogant. A member of the anti-war party during the existence of a war occupies a position which can only cease to be insignificant by the misfortunes of his country. But when we turn from the partisan to the man, we perceive that Daniel Webster was a great pres- ence in the House, and took rank immediately with the half- dozen ablest debaters. His self-possession was perfect at all times, and at thirty-three he was still in the spring and first lustre of his powers. His weighty and deliberate manner, the brevity, force, and point of his sentences, and the moderation of his ges- tures, were all in strong contrast to the flowing, loose, impassioned manner of the Southern orators, who ruled the House. It was something like coming upon a stray number of the old Edinburgh Review in a heap of novels and Ladies' Magazines. Chief-Jus- tice Marshall, who heard his first speech, being himself a Feder- • 84 DANIEL WEBSTER. alist, was so much delighted to hear his own opinions expressed with such power and dignity, that he left the House, believing that this stranger from far-off New Hampshire was destined to become, as he said, " one of the very first statesmen of America, and perhaps the very first." His Washington fame gave him new eclat at home. He was re-elected, and came back to Congress in 1815, to aid the Federalists in preventing the young Republicans from being too Federal. This last sentence slipped from the pen unawares ; but, ridic- ulous as it looks, it does actually express the position and voca- tion of the Federalists after the peace of 1815. Clay, Calhoun, Story, Adams, and the Republican majority in Congress, taught by the disasters of the war, as they supposed, had embraced the ideas of the old Federalist party, and were preparing to carry some of them to an extreme. The navy had no longer an enemy. The strict constructionists had dwindled to a few impracticables, headed by John Randolph. The younger Republicans were dis- posed to a liberal, if not to a latitudinarian construction of the Constitution. In short, they were Federalists and Hamiltonians, bank men, tariff men, internal-improvement men. Then was afforded to the country the curious spectacle of Federalists opposing the measures which had been among the rallying-cries of their party for twenty years. It was not in Daniel Webster's nature to be a leader ; it was morally impossible for him to dis- engage himself from party ties. This exquisite and consummate artist in oratory, who could give such weighty and brilliant expression to the feelings of his hearers and the doctrines of his party, had less originating power, whether of intellect or of will, than any other man of equal eminence that ever lived. He ad- hered to the fag end of the old party, until it was absorbed, unavoidably, with scarcely an effort of its own, in Adams and Clay. From 1815 to 1825 he was in opposition, and in opposi- tion to old Federalism revived ; and, consequently, we believe that posterity will decide that his speeches of this period are the only ones relating to details of policy which have the slightest permanent value. In fact, his position in Congress, as a member of a very small band of Federalists who had no hope of regain- DANIEL WEBSTER. 85 ing power, was the next thing to being independent, and he made an excellent use of his advantage. That Bank of the United States, for example, of which, in 1832, he was the ablest defender, and for a renewal of which he strove for ten years, he voted against in 1816; and for reasons which neither he nor any other man ever refuted. His speeches criticising the various bank schemes of 1815 and 1816 were serviceable to the public, and made the bank, as finally estab- lished, less harmful than it might have been. So of the tariff. On this subject, too, he always followed, — never led. So long as there was a Federal party, he, as a mem- ber of it, opposed Mr. Clay's protective, or (as Mr. Clay de- lighted to term it) "American system." When, in 1825, the few Federalists in the House voted for Mr. Adams, and were merged in the "conservative wing" of the Republican party, which became, in time, the Whig party, then, and from that time for- ward to the end of his life, he was a protectionist. His anti-pro- tection speech of 1824 is wholly in the modern spirit, and takes precisely the ground since taken by Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, and others of the new schoolstf^It is so excellent a statement of the true policy of the United States with regard to protection, that we have often wondered it has been allowed to sleep so long in the tomb of his works. And, oh ! from what evils might we have been spared, — nullification, surplus-revenue embarrass- ments, hot-bed manufactures, clothing three times its natural price, — if the protective legislation of Congress had been inspired by the Webster of 1824, instead of the Clay ! Unim- portant as this great speech may now seem, as it lies uncut in the third volume of its author's speeches, its unturned leaves sticking together, yet we can say of it, that the whole course of American history had been different if its counsels had been followed. The essence of the speech is contained in two of its phrases : " Freedom of trade, the general principle ; restriction, the exception." Free trade, the object to bo aimed at; protec- tion, a temporary expedient. Free trade, the interest of all nations ; protection, the occasional necessity of one. Free trade, the final and universal good; protection, the sometimes necessary 8G DANIEL WEBSTER. evil. Free trade, as soon as possible and as complete as possi- ble ; protection, as little as possible and as short as possible. The speech was delivered in reply to Mr. Clay ; and, viewed merely as a reply, it is difficult to conceive of one more trium- phant. Mr. Webster was particularly happy in turning Mr. Clay's historical illustrations against him, especially those drawn from the history of the English silk manufacture, and the Spanish system of restriction and prohibition. Admitting fully that manu- factures the most unsuited to the climate, soil, and genius of a country could be created by protection, he showed that such man- ufactures were not, upon the whole, and in the long run, a bene- fit to a country; and adduced, for an illustration, the very instance cited by Mr. Clay, — the silk manufacture of England, — which kept fifty thousand persons in misery, and necessitated the con- tinuance of a kind of legislation which the intelligence of Great Britain had outgrown. Is not the following brief passage an al- most exhaustive statement of the true American policy ? " I know it would be very easy to promote manufactures, at least for a time, but probably for a short time only, if we might act in disregard of other interests. We could cause a sudden transfer of capital and a violent change in the pursuits of men. We could exceedingly benefit some classes by these means. But what then becomes of the interests of others? The power of collecting revenue by duties on imports, and the habit of the government of collecting almost its whole revenue in that mode, will enable us, without exceeding the bounds of modera- tion, to give great advantages to those classes of manufactures which we may think most useful to promote at home." One of his happy retorts upon Mr. Clay was the following : — " I will be so presumptuous as to take up a challenge which Mr. Speaker has thrown down. He has asked us, in a tone of interrogatory indicative of the feeling of anticipated triumph, to niention any coun- try in which manufactures have ilourished without the aid of prohibi- tory laws Sir, I am ready to answer this inquiry. " There is a country, not undistinguished among the nations, in which the progress of manufactures has been more rapid than in any other, and yet unaided by prohibitions or unnatural restrictions. That country, the happiest which the sun shines on, is our own." Again, Mr. Clay had made the rash remark that it would cost DANIEL WEBSTER. 87 the nation, as a nation, nothing to convert our ore into iron. Mr. Webster's reply to this seems to us eminently worthy of consider- ation at the present moment, and at every moment when the tariff is a topic of debate. " I think," said he, " it would cost us precisely what we can least afford, that is, great labor Of manual labor no nation has more than a certain quantity ; nor can it be increased at will A most important question for every nation, as well as for every individual, to propose to itself, is, how it can best apply that quantity of labor which it is able to perform Now, with respect to the quantity of labor, as we all know, different nations are differently circumstanced. Some need, more than anything, work for hands ; others require hands for work ; and if we ourselves are not absolutely in the latter class, we are still, most fortunately, very near it." The applicability of these observations to the present condition of affairs in the United States — labor very scarce, and protec- tionists clamoring to make it scarcer — must be apparent to every reader. , _^ _ But this was the last of Mr. Webster's efforts in behalf of the freedom of trade. In the spring of 1825, when it devolved upon the House of Representatives to elect a President, the few Fed- eralists remaining in the House became, for a few days, an im- portant body. Mr. Webster had an hereditary love for the house of Adams ; and the aged Jefferson himself had personally warned him against Andrew Jackson. Webster it was who, in an inter- view with Mr. Adams, obtained such assurances as determined the Federalists to give their vote for the New England candi- date ; and thus terminated the existence of the great party which Hamilton had founded, with which Washington had sympathized, which had ruled the country for twelve years, and maintained a vigorous and useful opposition for a quarter of a century. Daniel Webster was in opposition no longer. He was a defender of the administration of Adams and Clay, supported all their important measures, and voted for, nay, advocated, the Tariff Bill of 1828, which went far beyond that of 1824 in its protective provisions. Taunted with such a remarkable and sudden change of opinion, he said that, New England having been compelled by the act of 88 DANIEL WEBSTER. 1824 to transfer a large part of her capital from commerce to manufactures, he was bound, as her representative, to demand the continuance of the system. Few persons, probably, who heard him give this reason for his conversion, believed it was the true one ; and few will ever believe it who shall intimately know the transactions of that winter in Washington. But if it was the true reason, Mr. Webster, in giving it, ruled himself out of the rank of the Great, — who, in every age and land, lead, not follow, their generation. In his speech of 1824 he objects to the protective system on general principles, applicable to every case not clearly exceptional ; and the further Congress was dis- posed to carry an erroneous system, the more was he bound to lift up his voice against it. It seems to us that, when he aban- doned the convictions of his own mind and took service under Mr. Clay, he descended (to use the fine simile of the author of " Felix Holt") from the rank of heroes to that of the multitude for whom heroes fight. He was a protectionist, thenceforth, as long as he lived. If he was right in 1824, how wrong he was in 1846! In 1824 he pointed to the high wages of American me- chanics as a proof that the protective system was unnecessary ; and he might have quoted Adam Smith to show that, in 1770, wages in the Colonies were just as high, compared with wages in Europe, as in 1824. In 1846 he attributed high wages in America to the operation of the protective system. In 1824 free trade was the good, and restriction the evil; in 1846 restric- tion was the good, and free trade the evil. Practical wisdom, indeed, was not in this man. He was not formed to guide, but to charm, impress, and rouse mankind. His advocacy of the Greek cause, in 1824, events have shown to be unwise ; but his speech on this subject contains some passages so exceedingly fine, noble, and harmonious, that we do not believe they have ever been surpassed in extempore speech by any man but himself. The passage upon Public Opinion, for example, is always read with delight, even by those who can call to mind the greatest number of instances of its apparent untruth. " The time has been, indeed, when fleets, and armies, and subsidies were the principal reliances, even in the best cause. But, happily for DANIEL WEBSTER. 89 mankind, a great change has taken place in this respect. Moral causes come into consideration in proportion as the progress of knowledge is advanced ; and the public opinion of the civilized world is rapidly gaining an ascendency over mere brutal force It may be silenced by military power, but it cannot be conquered. It is elastic, irrepressi- ble, and invulnerable to the weapons of ordinary warfare. It is that impassible, unextinguishable enemy of mere violence and arbitrary rule, which, like Milton's angels, ' Vital in every part Cannot, but by annihilating, die.' Until this be propitiated or satisfied, it is vain for power to talk either of triumphs or of repose. No matter what fields are desolated, what fortresses surrendered, what armies subdued, or what provinces overrun There is an enemy that still exists to check the glory of these triumphs. It follows the conqueror back to the very scene of his ovations ; it calls upon him to take notice that Europe, though silent, is yet indignant ; it shows him that the sceptre of his victory is a barren sceptre ; that it shall confer neither joy nor honor ; but shall moulder to dry ashes in his grasp. In the midst of his exultation, it pierces his ear with the cry of injured justice ; it denounces against him the indig- nation of an enlightened and civilized age ; it turns to bitterness the cup of his rejoicing, and wounds him with the sting which belongs to the consciousness of having outraged the opinion of mankind." — Works, Vol. III. pp. 77, 78. Yes : if the conqueror had the moral feeling which inspired this passage, and if the cry of injured justice could pierce the flattering din of office-seekers surrounding him. But, reading the paragraph as the expression of a hope of what may one day be, how grand and consoling it is ! The information given in this fine oration respecting the condition of Greece and the history of her struggle for independence was provided for him by the indus- try of his friend, Edward Everett. One of the minor triumphs of Mr. Webster's early Congres- sional life was his conquest of the heart of John Randolph. In the course of a debate on the sugar tax, in 1816, Mr. Webster had the very common fortune of offending the irascible member from Virginia, and Mr. Randolph, as his custom was, demanded an explanation of the offensive words. Explanation was re- fused by the member from Massachusetts ; whereupon Mr. Ran- 90 DANIEL WEBSTER. dolph demanded " the satisfaction which his insulted feelings re- quired." Mr. Webster's reply to this preposterous demand was everything that it ought to have been. He told Mr. Randolph that he had no right to an explanation, and that the temper and style of the demand were such as to forbid its being conceded as a matter of courtesy. He denied, too, the right of any man to call him to the field for what he might please to consider an in- sult to his feelings, although he should be " always prepared to repel in a suitable manner the aggression of any man who may presume upon such a refusal." The eccentric Virginian was so much pleased with Mr. Webster's bearing upon this occasion, that he manifested a particular regard for him, and pronounced him a very able man for a Yankee. It was during these years that Daniel Webster became dear, beyond all other men of his time, to the people of New England. Removing to Boston in 1816, and remaining out of Congress for some years, he won the first place at the New England bar, and a place equal to the foremost at the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States. Not one of his legal arguments has been exactly reported, and some of the most important of them we possess merely in outline ; but in such reports as we have, the weight and clearness of his mind are abundantly apparent. In almost every argument of his, there can be found digressions which relieve the strained attention of the bench, and please the unlearned hearer; and he had a happy way of suddenly crys- tallizing his argument into one luminous phrase, which often seemed to prove his case by merely stating it. Thus, in the Dartmouth College case, he made a rare display of learning (fur- nished him by associate counsel, he tells us) ; but his argument is concentrated in two of his simplest sentences: — 1. The en- dowment of a college is private property ; 2. The charter of a college is that which constitutes its endowment private property. The Supreme Court accepted these two propositions, and thus secured to every college in the country its right to its endowment. This seems too simple for argument, but it cost a prodigious and powerfully contested lawsuit to reduce the question to this sim- plicity; and it was Webster's large, calm, and discriminating DANIEL WEBSTER. 91 glance which detected these two fundamental truths in the moun- tain mass of testimony, argument, and judicial decision. In ar- guing the great steamboat case, too, he displayed the same quali- ties of mind. New York having granted to Livingston and Fulton the exclusive right to navigate her waters by steamboats, certain citizens of New Jersey objected, and, after a fierce strug- gle upon the waters themselves, transferred the contest to the Supreme Court. Mr. "Webster said : " The commerce of the United States, under the Constitution of 1787, is a unit," and " what we call the waters of the State of New York are, for the purposes of navigation and commerce, the waters of the United States " ; therefore no State can grant exclusive privileges. The Supreme Court affirmed this to be the true doctrine, and thence- forth Captain Cornelius Vanderbilt ran his steamboat without feeling it necessary, on approaching New York, to station a lady at the helm and to hide himself in the hold. Along with this concentrating power, Mr. "Webster possessed, as every school-boy knows, a fine talent for amplification and narrative. His narra- tion of the murder of Captain "White was almost enough of itself to hang a man. But it was not his substantial services to his country which drew upon him the eyes of all New England, and made him dear to every son of the Pilgrims. In 1820, the Pilgrim Society of Plymouth celebrated the anniversary of the landing of their fore- fathers in America. At the dinner of the Society, that day, every man found beside his plate five kernels of corn, to remind him of the time when that was the daily allowance of the set- tlers, and it devolved upon Daniel "Webster to show how worthy they were of better fare. His address on this anniversary is but an amplification of his Junior Fourth-of-July oration of 1800 ; but what an amplification ! It differed from that youthful essay as the first flights of a young eagle, from branch to branch up- on its native tree, differ from the sweep of his wings when he takes a continent in his flight, and swings from mountain range to mountain range. "We are awaro that eulogy is, of all the kinds of composition, the easiest to execute in a tolerable manner. What Mr. Everett calls " patriotic eloquence " should 92 DANIEL WEBSTER. usually be left to persons who are in the gushing time of life ; for when men address men, they should say something, clear up something, help forward something, accomplish something. It is not becoming in a full-grown man to utter melodious wind. Nevertheless, it can be truly said of this splendid and irresistible oration, that it carries that kind of composition as far as we can ever expect to see it carried, even in this its native land. What a triumphant joy it must have been to an audience, accustomed for three or four generations to regard preaching as the noblest Avork of man, keenly susceptible to all the excellences of uttered speech, and who now heard their plain old fathers and grand- fathers praised in such massive and magnificent English ! Nor can it be said that this speech says nothing. In 1820 it was still part of the industry of New England to fabricate certain articles required by slave-traders in their hellish business ; and there were still descendants of the Pilgrims who were actually en- gaged in the traffic. " If there be," exclaimed the orator, " within the extent of our knowl- edge or influence any participation in this traffic, let us pledge our- selves here, upon the rock of Plymouth, to extirpate and destroy it. It is not fit that the land of the Pilgrims should bear the shame longer. I hear the sound of the hammer, I see the smoke of the furnaces where manacles and fetters are still forged for human limbs. I see the visa- ges of those who by stealth and at midnight labor in this work of hell, foul and dark, as may become the artificers of such instruments of misery and torture. Let that spot be purified, or let it cease to be of New England."— Works, Vol. I. pp. 45, 46. And he proceeds, in language still more energetic, to call upon his countrymen to purge their land of this iniquity. This ora- tion, widely circulated through the press, gave the orator uni- versal celebrity in the Northern States, and was one of the many causes which secured his continuance in the national councils. Such was his popularity in Boston, that, in 1824, he was re- elected to Congress by 4,990 votes out of 5,000 ; and such was his celebrity in his profession, that his annual retainers from banks, insurance companies, and mercantile firms yielded an in- come that would have satisfied most lawyers even of great emi- DANIEL WEBSTER. 93 nence. Those were not the times of five-thousand-dollar fees. As late as 1819, as we see in Mr. Webster's books, he gave "ad- vice " in important cases for twenty dollars ; his regular retaining fee was fifty dollars ; his " annual retainer," one hundred dollars ; his whole charge for conducting a cause rarely exceeded five hun- dred dollars; and the income of a whole year averaged about twenty thousand dollars. Twenty years later, he has gained a larger sum than that by the trial of a single cause ; but in 1820 such an income was immense, and probably not exceeded by that of any other American lawyer. Most lawyers in the United States, he once said, "live well, work hard, and die poor"; and this is particularly likely to be the case with lawyers who spend six months of the year in Congress. Northern members of Congress, from the foundation of the government, have usually gratified their ambition only by the sacrifice of their interests. The Congress of the United States, modelled upon the Parliament of Great Britain, finds in the North no suitable class of men who can afford to be absent from their affairs half the year. We should naturally choose to be represented in Washington by men distinguished in their several spheres ; but in the North, almost all such persons are so involved in business that they cannot accept a seat in Congress, except at the peril of their fortune ; and this inconvenience is aggravated by the habits that prevail at the seat of government. In the case of a lawyer like Daniel Webster, who has a large practice in the Supreme Court, the difficulty is diminished, because he can usu- ally attend the court without seriously neglecting his duties in Congress, — usually, but not always. There was one year in the Congressional life of Mr. Webster when he was kept out of the Supreme Court for four months by the high duty that devolved upon him of refuting Calhoun's nullification subtilties ; but even in that year, his professional income was more than seven thou- sand dollars ; and he ought by that time, after thirty years of most successful practice, to have been independent of his profes- sion. He was not, however ; and never would have been, if he had practised a century. Those habits of profusion, that reck- less disregard of pecuniary considerations, of which we noticed 94 DANIEL WEBSTER. indications in his early days, seemed to be part of his moral con- stitution. He never appeared to know how much money he had, nor how much he owed ; and, what was worse, he never appeared to care. Pie was a profuse giver and a careless payer. It was far easier for him to send a hundred-dollar note in reply to a beg- ging letter, than it was to discharge a long-standing account ; and when he had wasted his resources in extravagant and demoraliz- ing gifts, he deemed it a sufficient answer to a presented bill to ask his creditor how a man could pay money who had none. It is not true, therefore, that the frequent embarrassments of his later years were due to the loss of practice by his attendance in Congress ; because, in the years when his professional gains were smallest, his income was large enough for the wants of any reasonable man. Nevertheless, we cannot deny that when, in 1827, by his acceptance of a seat in the Senate, he gave himself permanently to public life, he made a sacrifice of his pecuniary interests which, for a man of such vast requirements and uncalcu- lating habits, was very great. But his reward was also very great. On that elevated the- atre he soon found an opportunity for the display of his talents, which, while it honored and served his country, rendered him the foremost man in that part of it where such talents as his could be appreciated. All wars of which we have any knowledge have consisted of two parts : first, a war of words ; secondly, the conflict of arms. The war of words which issued in the late Rebellion began, in 1828, by the publication of Mr. Calhoun's first paper upon Nullifi- cation, called the South Carolina Exposition ; and it ended in April, 1861, when President Lincoln issued his call for seventy- five thousand troops, which excited so much merriment at Mont- gomery. This was a period of thirty-three years, during which every person in the United States who could use either tongue or pen joined in the strife of words, and contributed his share either toward hastening or postponing the final appeal to the sword. Men fight with one another, says Dr. Franklin, because they have not sense enough to settle their disputes in any other way ; and when once they have begun, never stop killing one DANIEL WEBSTER. 95 another as long as they have money enough " to pay the hu tell- ers." So it appeared in our ca-:e. Of all the men who took part in this preliminary war of words, Daniel Webster was incomparably the ablest. He seemed charged with a message and a mission to the people of the United States ; and almost everything that he said in his whole life of real value has refer- ence to that message and that mission. The necessity of the Union of these States, the nature of the tie that binds them together, the means by which alone that tie can be kept strong, — this was what he came charged to impart to us ; and when he had fully delivered this message, he had done his work. His numberless speeches upon the passing questions of the day, — tariff, Bank, currency, Sub-treasury, and the rest, — in which the partisan spoke rather than the man, may have had tlieir value at the time, but there is little in them of durable worth. Those of them which events have not refuted, time has rendered obsolete. No general principles are established in them which can be applied to new cases. Indeed, he used often to assert that there iwere no general principles in practical statesmanship, but that the government of nations is, and must be, a series of expedients. Several times, in his published works, can be found the assertion, that there is no such thing as a science of political economy, though he says he had "turned over" all the authors on that subject from Adam Smith to his own time. It is when he speaks of the Union and the Constitution, and when he is rousing the sentiment of nationality, that he utters, not, indeed, eternal truths, but truths necessary to the existence of the United States, and which can only become obsolete- when the nation is no more. The whole of his previous life had been an unconscious prep- aration for these great debates. It was one of the recollections of his childhood, that, in his eighth year, he had bought a hand- kerchief upon which was printed the Constitution of 1787, which he then read through ; and while he was a farmer's boy at home, the great question of its acceptance or rejection had been decided. His father's party was the party for the Constitution, whose only regret concerning it was, that it was not so much of a constitution 96 DANIEL WEBSTER. as they wished it to be. The Kepublicans dwelt upon its defects and dangers ; the Federalists, upon its advantages and beauties : so that all that this receptive lad heard of it at his father's fire- side was of its value and necessity. We see in his youthful orations that nothing in the history of the continent struck his^ imagination so powerfully as the spectacle of thirty-eight gentle- men meeting in a quiet city, and peacefully settling the terms of a national union between thirteen sovereign States, most of which gave up, voluntarily, what the sword alone was once supposed capable of extorting. In all his orations on days of national festivity or mourning, we observe that his weightiest eulogy falls upon those who were conspicuous in this great business. Because Hamilton aided in it, he revered his memory ; because Madison was its best interpreter, he venerated his name and deferred absolutely to his judgment. It was clear to his mind that the President can only dismiss an officer of the government as he appoints him, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate ; but he would not permit himself to think so against Mr. Madi- son's decision. His own triumphs at the bar — those upon which he plumed himself — were all such as resulted from his lonely broodings over, and patient study of, the Constitution of his country. A native of one of the smallest of the States, to which the Union was an unmixed benefit and called for no sacrifice of pride, he grew up into nationality without having to pass through any probation of States' rights scruples. Indeed, it was as natu- ral for a man of his calibre to be a national man as it is for his own Monadnock to be three thousand feet above the level of the sea. The South Carolina Exposition of 1828 appeared to fall still- born from the press. Neither General Jackson nor any of his nearest friends seem to have been so much as aware of its ex- istence ; certainly they attached no importance to it. Colonel Benton assures us, that to him the Hayne debate, so far as it re- lated to constitutional questions, seemed a mere oratorical display, without adequate cause or object ; and we know that General Jackson, intimately allied with the Hayne family and strongly attached to Colonel Hayne himself, wished him success in the de- DANIEL WEBSTER. 97 bate, and heard with regret that Mr. Webster was " demolishing " him. Far, indeed, was any one from supposing that a movement had been set on foot which was to end only with the total destruc- tion of the " interest " sought to be protected by it. Far was any one from foreseeing that so poor and slight a thing as the Expo- sition was the beginning of forty years of strife. It is evident from the Banquo passage of Mr. Webster's principal speech, when, looking at Vice-President Calhoun, he reminded that am- bitious man that, in joining the coalition which made Jackson President, he had only given Van Buren a push toward the Presidency, — " No son of theirs succeeding," — it is evident, we say, from this passage, and from other covert allusions, that he understood the game of Nullification from the beginning, so far as its objects were personal. But there is no reason for supposing that he attached importance to it before that memorable afternoon in December, 1830, when he strolled from the Supreme Court in- to the Senate-chamber, and chanced to hear Colonel Hayne re- viling New England, and repeating the doctrines of the South Carolina Exposition. Every one knows the story of this first triumph of the United States over its enemies. Daniel Webster, as Mr. Everett re- cords, appeared to be the only person in Washington who was entirely at his ease ; and he was so remarkably unconcerned, that Mr. Everett feared he was not aware of the expectations of the public, and the urgent necessity of his exerting all his powers. Another friend mentions, that on the day before the delivery of the principal speech the orator lay down as usual, after dinner, upon a sofa, and soon was heard laughing to himself. Being asked what he was laughing at, he said he had just thought of a way to turn Colonel ITayne's quotation about Banquo's ghost against himself, and he was going to get up and make a note of it. This he did, and then resumed his nap. Notwithstanding these appearances of indifference, he was fully roused to the importance of the occasion ; and, indeed, we have the impression that only on this occasion, in his whole life, were all his powers in full activity and his entire mass of being in full glow. But even then the artist was apparent in all that he did, 5 G 98 DANIEL WEBSTER. and particularly in the dress which he wore. At that time, in his forty-eighth year, his hair was still as black as an Indian's, and it lay in considerable masses about the spacious dome of his fore- head. His form had neither the slenderness of his youth nor the elephantine magnitude of his later years ; it was fully, but finely, developed, imposing and stately, yet not wanting in alertness and grace. No costume could have been better suited to it than his blue coat and glittering gilt buttons, his ample yellow waistcoat, his black trousers, and snowy cravat. It was in some degree, per- haps, owing to the elegance and daintiness of his dress that, while the New England men among his hearers were moved to tears, many Southern members, like Colonel Benton, regarded the speech merely as a Fourth-of-July oration delivered on the Gth of January. Benton assures us, however, that he soon discov- ered his error, for the Nullifiers were not to be put down by a speech, and soon revealed themselves in their true character, as " irreconcilable " foes of the Union. This was Daniel Web- ster's own word in speaking of that faction in 1830, — " irrecon- cilable." After this transcendent effort, — perhaps the greatest of its kind ever made by man, — Daniel Webster had nothing to gain in the esteem of the Northern States. He was indisputably our foremost man, and in Massachusetts there was no one who could be said to be second to him in the regard of the people : he was a whole species in himself. In the subsequent winter of debate with Calhoun upon the same subject, he added many details to his argument, developed it in many directions, and accumulated a great body of constitutional reasoning ; but so far as the people were concerned, the reply to Hayne sufficed. In all those debates we are struck with his colossal, his superfluous superiority to his opponents ; and we wonder how it could have been that such a man should have thought it worth while to refute such puerilities. It ^was^ however, abundantly worth while. | The assailed Constitution needed such a defender. It was necessary that the patriotic feeling of the American . people, which was destined to a trial so severe, should have an tinshakable basis of intelligent conviction. It was necessary that all men should be DANIEL WEBSTER. 99 made distinctly to see that the Constitution was not a "compact" to which the States "acceded," and from which they could secede, hut the fundamental law, which the people had established and ordained, from which there could be no secession but by revolution. , It was necessary that the country should be made to understand that Nullification and Secession were one and the same ; [and that to admit the first, promising to stop short at the -^cond", was as though a man " should take the plunge of-Niag- ara and cry out that he would stop half-way down." /Mr. Web- ster's principal speech on this subject, delivered in 1832, has, and will ever have, with the people and the Courts of the United States, the authority of a judicial decision ; and it might very properly be added to popular editions of the Constitution as an appendix. Into the creation of the feeling and opinion which fought out the late war for the Union a thousand and ten thou- sand causes entered ; every man who had ever performed a patriotic action, and every man who ever from his heart had spoken a patriotic word, contributed to its production ; but to no man, perhaps, were we more indebted for it than to the Daniel Webster of 1830 and 1832. We cannot so highly commend his votes in 1832 as his speeches. General Jackson's mode of dealing with nullification seems to us the model for every government to follow which ha^ to deal with discontented subjects: — 1. To take care that the laws are obeyed ; 2. To remove the real grounds of discontent. This was General Jackson's plan. This, also, was the aim of Mr. Clay's compromise. Mr. Webster objected to both, on the ground that nullification was rebellion, and that no legislation respecting the pretext for rebellion should be entertained until the rebellion was quelled. Thus he came out of the battle, dear to the thinking people of the country, but estranged from the three political powers, — Henry Clay and his friends, General Jackson and his friends, Calhoun and his friends ; and though he soon lapsed again under the leadership of Mr. Clay, there was never again a cordial union between him and any interior circle of politicians who could have gratified his ambition. Deceived by the thunders of applause which greeted him wherever he 100 DANIEL WEBSTER. went, and the intense adulation of his own immediate circle, he thought that he too could be an independent power in politics. Two wild vagaries seemed to have haunted him ever after : first, that a man could merit the Presidency ; secondly, that a man could get the Presidency by meriting it. From 1832 to the end of his life it appears to us that Daniel Webster was undergoing a process of deterioration, moral and mental. His material part gained upon his spiritual. Naturally inclined to indolence, and having an enormous capacity for phys- ical enjoyment, a great hunter, fisherman, and farmer, a lover of good wine and good dinners, a most jovial companion, his phys- ical desires and tastes were constantly strengthened by being keenly gratified, while his mind was fed chiefly upon past ac- quisitions. There is nothing in his later efforts which shows any intellectual advance, nothing from which we can infer that he had been browsing in forests before untrodden, or feeding in pas- tures new. He once said, at Marshfield, that, if he could live three lives in one, he would like to devote them all to study, — one to geology, one to astronomy, and one to classical literature. But it does not appear that he invigorated and refreshed the old age of his mind, by doing more than glance over the great works which treat of these subjects. A new language every ten years, or a new science vigorously pursued, seems necessary to preserve the freshness of the understanding, especially when the physical tastes are superabundantly nourished. He could praise Rufus Choate for reading a little Latin and Greek every day, — and this was better than nothing, — but he did not follow his exam- ple. There is an aged merchant in New York, who has kept his mind from growing old by devoting exactly twenty minutes every day to the reading of some abstruse book, as far removed from his necessary routine of thought as he could find. Goethe's ad- vice to every one to read every day a short poem, recognizes the danger we all incur in taking systematic care of the body and I letting the soul take care of itself. During the last ten years of Daniel Webster's life, he spent many a thousand dollars upon his library, and almost ceased to be an intellectual being. His pecuniary habits demoralized him. It was wrong and DANIEL WEBSTER. 101 mean in him to accept gifts of money from the people of Boston ; it was wrong in them to submit to his merciless exactions. What need was there that their Senator should sometimes be a mendi- cant and sometimes a pauper ? If he chose to maintain baronial state without a baron's income ; if he chose to have two fancy farms of more than a thousand acres each ; if he chose to keep two hundred prize cattle and seven hundred choice sheep for his pleasure ; if he must have about his house lamas, deer, and all rare fowls ; if his flower-garden must be one acre in extent, and his books worth thirty thousand dollars ; if he found it pleasant to keep two or three yachts and a little fleet of smaller craft ; if he could not refrain from sending money in answer to begging letters, and pleased himself by giving away to his black man money enough to buy a very good house ; and if he could not avoid adding wings and rooms to his spacious mansion at Marsh- field, and must needs keep open house there and have a dozen guests at a time, — why should the solvent and careful business men of Boston have been taxed, or have taxed themselves, to pay any part of the expense ? Mr. Lanman, his secretary, gives us this curious and contra- dictory account of his pecuniary habits : — "He made money with ease, and spent it without reflection. He had accounts with various banks, and men of all parties were always glad to accommodate him with loans, if he wanted them. He kept no record of his deposits, unless it were on slips of paper hidden in his pockets ; these matters were generally left with his secretary. His notes were seldom or never regularly protested, and when they were, they caused him an immense deal of mental anxiety. When the writer has sometimes drawn a check for a couple of thousand dollars, he has not even looked at it, but packed it away in his pockets, like so much waste paper. During his long professional career, he earned money enough to make a dozen fortunes, but he spent it liberally, and gave it away to the poor by hundreds and thousands. Begging letters from women and unfortunate men were received by him almost daily, at certain periods ; and one instance is remembered where, on six suc- cessive days, he sent remittances of fifty and one hundred dollars to people with whom he was entirely unacquainted. He was indeed care- less, but strictly and religiously honest, in all his money matters. He 102 DANIEL WEBSTER. knew not how to be otherwise. The last fee which he ever received for a single legal argument was $11,000 " A sanctimonious lady once called upon Mr. Webster, in Washing- ton, with a long and pitiful story about her misfortunes and poverty, and asked him for a donation of money to defray her expenses to her home in a Western city. He listened with all the patience he could manage, expressed his surprise that she should have called upon him for money, simply because he was an officer of the government, and that, too, when she was a total stranger to him, reprimanded her in very plain language for her improper conduct, and handed her a note of fifty dollars. • • ■ • • " He had called upon the cashier of the bank where he kept an ac- count, for the purpose of getting a draft discounted, when that gentle- man expressed some surprise, and casually inquired why he wanted so much money ? ' To spend ; to buy bread and meat,' replied Mr. Web- ster, a little annoyed at this speech. " ' But,' returned the cashier, ' you already have upon deposit in the bank no less than three thousand dollars, and I was only wondering why you wanted so much money.' " This was indeed the truth, but Mr. Webster had forgotten it." Mr. Lanman's assertion that Mr. Webster, with all this reck- lessness, was religiously honest, must have excited a grim smile upon the countenances of such of his Boston readers as had had his name upon their books. No man can be honest long who is careless in his expenditures. It is evident from his letters, if we did not know it from other sources of information, that his carelessness with regard to the balancing of his books grew upon him as he advanced in life, and kept pace with the general deterioration of his character. In 1824, before he had been degraded by the acceptance of pecuni- ary aid, and when he was still a solvent person, one of his nephews asked him for a loan. He replied : " If you think you can do anything useful with a thousand dollars, you may have that sum in the spring, or sooner, if need be, on the following conditions : — 1. You must give a note for it with reasonable security. 2. The interest must be payable annually, and must be paid at the day without fail. And so long as this continues to be done, the money not to be called for — the principal — under six months' notice. DANIEL WEBSTER. 103 I am thus explicit with you, because you wish me to be so ; and because also, having a little money, and but a little, I am resolved on keeping it." This is sufficiently business-like. He had a lit- tle money then, — enough, as he intimates, for the economical maintenance of his family. During the land fever of 1835 and 1836, he lost so seriously by speculations in Western land, that he was saved from bankruptcy only by the aid of that mystical but efficient body whom he styled his " friends " ; and from that time to the end of his life he was seldom at his ease. He earned immense occasional fees, — two of twenty-five thousand dollars each ; he received frequent gifts of money, as well as a regular stipend from an invested capital ; but he expended so profusely, that he was sometimes at a loss for a hundred dollars to pay his hay-makers ; and he died forty thousand dollars in debt. The adulation of which he was the victim at almost every hour of his existence injured and deceived him. He was continually informed that he was the greatest of living men, — the " godlike Daniel " ; and when he escaped even into the interior of his home, he found there persons who sincerely believed that making such speeches as his was the greatest of all possible human achievements. All men whose talents are of the kind which enable their possessor to give intense pleasure to great multitudes are liable to this misfortune ; and especially in a new and busy country, little removed from the colonial state, where intellectual eminence is rare, and the number of persons who can enjoy it is exceedingly great. "We are growing out of this provincial pro- pensity to abandon ourselves to admiration of the pleasure-giving talents. The time is at hand, we trust, when we shall not be struck with wonder because a man can make a vigorous speech, or write a good novel, or play Hamlet decently, and when we shall be able to enjoy the talent without adoring the man. The talent is one thing, and the man another ; the talent may be immense, and the man little ; the speech powerful and wise, the speaker weak and foolish. Daniel Webster came at last to loathe this ceaseless incense, but it was when his heart was set upon ho- mage of another kind, which he was destined never to enjoy. Another powerful cause of his deterioration was the strange, 104 DANIEL WEBSTER. strong, always increasing desire he had to be President. Any- intelligent politician, outside of the circle of his own " friends," could have told him, and proved to him, that he had little more chance of being elected President than the most insignificant man in the Whig party. And the marvel is, that he himself should not have known it, — he who knew why, precisely why, every candidate had been nominated, from Madison to General Taylor. In the teeth of all the facts, he still cherished the amaz- ing delusion that the Presidency of the United States, like the Premiership of England, is the natural and just reward of long and able public service. The Presidency, on the contrary, is not merely an accident, but it is an accident of the last moment. It is a game too difficult for mortal faculties to play, because some of the conditions of success are as uncertain as the winds, and as ungovernable. If dexterous playing could have availed, Douglas would have carried off the stakes, for he had an audacious and a mathematical mind ; while the winning man in 185G was a heavy player, devoid of skill, whose decisive advantage was that he had been out of the game for four years. Mr. Seward, too, was within an ace of winning, when an old quarrel between two New York editors swept his cards from the table. No : the President of the United States is not prime minister, but chief magistrate, and he is subject to that law of nature which jdaces at the head of regular governments more or less respecta- ble Nobodies. In Europe this law of nature works through the hereditary principle, and in America through universal suffrage. In all probability, we shall usually elect a person of the non-com- mittal species, — one who will have lived fifty or sixty years in the world without having formed an offensive conviction or uttered a striking word, — one who will have conducted his life as those popular periodicals are conducted, in which there are " no allusions to politics or religion." And may not this be part of the exquis- ite economy of nature, which ever strives to get into each place the smallest man that can fill it ? How miserably out of place would be a man of active, originating, disinterested spirit, at the head of a strictly limited, constitutional government, such as ours is in time of peace, in which the best President is he who does DANIEL WEBSTER. 105 the least ? Imagine a live man thrust out over the bows of a ship, and compelled to stand as figure-head, lashed by the waves and winds during a four years' voyage, and expected to be pleased with his situation because he is gilt ! Daniel Webster so passionately desired the place, that he could never see how far he was from the possibility of getting it. He was not such timber as either Southern fire-eaters or Northern wire-pullers had any use for ; and a melancholy sight it was, this man, once so stately, paying court to every passing Southerner, and personally begging delegates to vote for him. He was not made for that. An elephant does sometimes stand upon his head and play a barrel-organ, but every one who sees the sorry sight sees also that it was not the design of Nature that elephants should do such things. A Marshfield elm may be for half a century in decay without exhibiting much outward change ; and when, in some tempestu- ous night, half its bulk is torn away, the neighborhood notes with surprise that what seemed solid wood is dry and crumbling pith. During the last fifteen years of Daniel Webster's life, his wonder- fully imposing form and his immense reputation concealed from the public the decay of his powers and the degeneration of his morals. At least, few said what perhaps many felt, that " he was not the man he had been." People went away from one of his ponderous and empty speeches disappointed, but not ill pleased to boast that they too had " heard Daniel Webster speak," and feeling very sure that he could be eloquent, though he had not been. We heard one of the last of his out-of-door speeches. It was near Philadelphia, in 1844, when he was " -tumping the State" for Henry Clay, and when our youthful feelings were warmly with the object of his speech. What a disappointment ! How poor and pompous and pointless it seemed ! Nor could we resist the impression that he was playing a part, nor help saying to ourselves, as we turned to leave the scene, " This man is not sincere in this : he is a humbug." And when, some years later, we saw him present himself before a large audience in a state not far removed from intoxication, and mumble incoherence for ten minutes, and when, in the course of the evening, we saw him 5* 106 DANIEL WEBSTER. make a great show of approval whenever the clergy were com- plimented, the impression was renewed that the man had ex- pended his sincerity, and that nothing was real to him any more except wine and office. And even then such were the might and majesty of his presence, that he seemed to fill and satisfy the people by merely sitting there in an arm-chair, like Jupiter, in a spacious yellow waistcoat with two bottles of Madeira under it. All this gradual, unseen deterioration of mind and character was revealed to the country on the 7th of March, 1850. "What a downfall was there ! That shameful speech reads worse in 1867 than it did in 1850, and still exerts perverting power over timid and unformed minds. It was the very time for him to have broken finally with the " irreconcilable " faction, who, after hav- ing made President Tyler snub Daniel Webster from his dearly loved office of Secretary of State, had consummated the scheme which gave us Texas at the cost of war with Mexico, and Cali- fornia as one of the incidents of peace. California was not down in their programme ; and now, while claiming the right to make four slave States out of Texas, they refused to admit California to freedom. Then was it that Daniel Webster of Massachusetts rose in the Senate of the United States and said in substance this : These fine Southern brethren of ours have now stolen all the land there is to steal. Let us, therefore, put no obstacle in the way of their peaceable enjoyment of the plunder. And" the spirit of the speech was worse even than its doctrine. He went down upon the knees of his soul, and paid base homage to his own and his country's irreconcilable foes. Who knew bet- ter than Daniel Webster that John C. Calhoun and his followers had first created and then systematically fomented the hostile feeling which then existed between the North and the South ? How those men must have chuckled among themselves when they witnessed the willing degradation of the man who should have arraigned them before the country as the conscious enemies of its peace ! How was it that no one laughed outright at such billing and cooing as this ? Mr. Webster. — " An honorable member [Calhoun], whose health does not allow him to be here to-day — " DANIEL WEBSTER. 107 A Senator, — " He is here." Mr. Webster. — "I am very happy to hear that he is ; may he long be here, and in the enjoyment of health to serve his country ! " And this : — Mr. Webster. — " The honorable member did not disguise his conduct or his motives." Mr. Calhoun. — " Never, never." Mr. Webster. — " What he means he is very apt to say." Mr. Calhoun. — " Always, always." Mr. Webster. — "And I honor him for it." And this : — Mr. Webster. — "I see an honorable member of this body [Mason of Virginia] paying me the honor of listening to my remarks ; he brings to my mind, Sir, freshly and vividly, what I learned of his great ancestor, so much distinguished in his day and generation, so worthy to be succeeded by so worthy a grandson." And this : — Mr. Webster. — " An honorable member from Louisiana addressed us the other day on this subject. I suppose there is not a more amiable and worthy gentleman in this chamber, nor a gentleman who would be more slow to give offence to anybody, and he did not mean in his re- marks to give offence. But what did he say ? Why, Sir, he took pains to run a contrast between the slaves of the South and the laboring peo- ple of the North, giving the preference in all points of condition and comfort and happiness to the slaves." In the course of this speech there is one most palpable contra- diction. In the beginning of it, the orator mentioned the change of feeling and opinion that had occurred as to the institution of slavery, — " the North growing much more warm and strong against slavery, and the South growing much more warm and strong in its support." "Once," he said, "the most eminent men, and nearly all the conspicuous politicians of the South, held the same sentiments, — that slavery was an evil, a blight, a scourge, and a curse " ; but now it is " a cherished institution in that quarter ; no evil, no scourge, but a great religious, social, and moral blessing." He then asked how this change of opinion had been brought about, and thus answered the question : " I suppose, 108 DANIEL WEBSTER. sir, this is owing to the rapid growth and sudden extension of the cotton plantations in the South." And to make the statement more emphatic, he caused the word cotton to be printed in capi- tals in the authorized edition of his works. But later in the speech, when he came to add his ponderous condemnation to the odium in which the handful of Abolitionists were held, — the elite of the nation from Franklin's day to this, — then he attrib- uted this remarkable change to their zealous efforts to awaken the nobler conscience of the country. After giving his own ver- sion of their proceedings, he said : " Well, what was the result ? The bonds of the slaves were bound more firmly than before, their rivets were more strongly fastened. Public opinion, which in Virginia had begun to be exhibited against slavery, and was opening out for the discussion of the question, drew back and shut itself up in its castle." But all would not do. He bent the knee in vain. Vain too were his personal efforts, his Southern tour, his Astor House woo- ings, — the politicians would have none of him ; and he had the cut- ting mortification of seeing himself set aside for a Winfield Scott. Let us not, however, forget that on this occasion, though Dan- iel Webster appeared for the first time in his life as a leader, he was in reality still only a follower, — a follower, not of the public opinion of the North, but of the wishes of its capitalists. And probably many thousands of well-meaning men, not versed in the mysteries of politics, were secretly pleased to find themselves pro- vided with an excuse for yielding once more to a faction, who had over us the immense advantage of having made up their minds to carry their point or fight. If his was the shame of this speech, ours was the guilt. He faithfully represented the portion of his constituents whose wine he drank, who helped him out with his notes, and who kept his atmosphere hazy with incense ; and he faithfully represented, also, that larger number who wait till the wolf is at their door before arming against him, instead of meeting him afar off in the outskirts of the wood. Let us own it : the North yearned for peace in 1850, — peace at almost any price. One of the most intimate of Mr. Webster's friends said, in a public address : " It is true that he desired the highest political DANIEL WEBSTER. 109 position in the country, — that he thought he had fairly earned a claim to that position. And I solemnly believe that because that claim was denied his days were shortened." No enemy of the great orator ever uttered anything so severe against him as this, and we are inclined to think it an error. It was probably the strength of his desire for the Presidency that shortened his life, not the mere disappointment. "When President Fillmore offered him the post of Secretary of State, in 1850, it appears to have been his preference, much as he loved office, to decline it. He longed for his beautiful Marshfield, on the shore of the ocean, his herds of noble cattle, his broad, productive fields, his yachts, his fishing, his rambles in the forests planted by his own hand, his homely chats with neighbors and beloved dependents. " Oh ! " said he, " if I could have my own will, never, never would I leave Marshfield again ! " But his " friends," interested and disinter- ested, told him it was a shorter step from the office of Secretary of State to that of President than from the Senate-chamber. He yielded, as he always did, and spent a long, hot summer in "Wash- ington, to the sore detriment of his health. And again, in 1852, after he had failed to receive the nomination for the Presidency, he was offered the place of Minister to England. His " friends " again advised against his acceptance. His letter to the President, declining the offer, presents him in a sorry light indeed. " I have made up my mind to think no more about the English mission. .My principal reason is, that I think it would be regarded as a descent I have been accustomed to give instructions to ministers abroad, and not to receive them." Accustomed ! Yes : for two years ! It is probable enough that his acceptance of of- fice, and his adherence to it, hastened his death. Four months after the words were written which we have just quoted, he was no more. His last days were such as his best friends could have wished them to be, — calm, dignified, affectionate, worthy of his lineage. His burial, too, was singularly becoming, impressive, and touch- ing. We have been exceedingly struck with the account of it given by Mr. George S. Hillard, in his truly elegant and elo- quent eulogy upon Mr. Webster, delivered in Faneuil Hall. In HO DANIEL WEBSTER. his last will, executed a few days before his death, Mr. Webster requested that he might be buried " without the least show or os- tentation, but in a manner respectful to my neighbors, whose kindness has contributed so much to the happiness of me and mine." His wishes were obeyed ; and he was buried more as the son of plain, brave Captain Ebenezer Webster, than as Secre- tary of State. " No coffin," said Mr. Hillard, « concealed that majestic frame. In the open air, clad as when alive, he lay ex- tended in seeming sleep, with no touch of disfeature upon his brow, — as noble an image of reposing strength as ever was seen upon earth. Around him was the landscape that he had loved, and above him was nothing but the dome of the covering heav- ens. The sunshine fell upon the dead man's face, and the breeze blew over it. A lover of Nature, he seemed to be gathered into her maternal arms, and to lie like a child upon a mother's lap. We felt, as we looked upon him, that death had never stricken down, at one blow, a greater sum of life. And whose heart did not swell when, from the honored and distinguished men there gathered together, six plain Marshfield farmers were called forth to carry the head of their neighbor to the grave. Slowly and sadly the vast multitude followed, in mourning silence, and he was laid down to rest among dear and kindred dust." In surveying the life and works of this eminent and gifted man, we are continually struck with the evidences of his ma

'^ -> <■> ■& ^ ' ■/ ** eK \ '"OCT .•I "7*-/. +>