M ■y' , > «v - *p - ', ^v O - ! V "y- v& ^, v^ >- y ^ ^ oV ^^^^^^^_ ON THE PRINCIPLES AND ENDS OF PHILOSOPHY, COMPREHENDING AN EXAMINATION OF THE SYSTEMS WHICH NOW PREVAIL, AND A DETAIL OF THE ERRONEOUS PRINCIPLES ON WHICH THEY ARE FOUNDED, AND OF THE EVILS TO WHICH THEY TEND. ,-^6 BY RICHARD SAUMAREZ, Esq. F. R. C. C. LONDON: PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR, AND SOLD BY E. COX, ST. THOMAS'S STREET, BOROUGH j T. EGERTON, CHARING CROSS; AND J. JOHNSON, ST. PAUL'S CHURCH YARD. 1811. n Fage 7 Line 17 instead of minors read minnows. 12 of the note insert period after the word that. 16 Line 10, for connect read convert. 18 Line 9, after particular add a semicolon ;— 40 Last line but one, instead of millionth part read one million times more. 55 Line. 5, tot fwictions read sensations. 58 Line 8, dele pleasure or. 59 Line 3, after Jife insert to, and after design to. 60 Line 16, for subsisting read subsist. 61 Line 3, for divisibly read things divisible. 66 Line 9, for philosophers read philosophes . 77 Line 31, dele first word Jess. 135 Last line, for member read members. 165 Note at the last word of the page beginning May, to be trass* posed to page 87. 174 Head of chapter, read organic lile. 189 Line 11, us it possessed read that. 2.07 Last line but one, for specifi.ee read specific, &c. 6rc. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. On the Principles of Physical Science* CHAPTER II. On the Nature and Properties of Matter in general • • • • 25 CHAPTER III. On the Relation which Matter bears to the Organs of Sense, comprehending the Nature and Cause of Sensation and the objects of it • • 55 CHAPTER IV. On the Power of the Principle of Life and its Relation to Matter; comprehending the Nature and Attributes of the Mind • 71. CHAPTER V. On the Evolution of the Principle of Life, and the End or Final Cause for which different Beings were created • • 89 CHAPTER VI. On the Means by which Individuals attain the End or Final cause of their Existence •«••••••••« • 1 43 11 CONTENTS* CHAPTER VII. On the Physiology of Organic Life, comprehending the Functions of the Organs as the Instruments which are employed toattain those ends ....«♦. J 75 PREFACE NOTWITHSTANDING the boasted asser- tions which are generally made, of the high de- gree of perfection which in these latter days the different branches of philosophy are supposed to have attained; it will, I fear, upon a fair en- quiry be found, that we continue in the very infancy of our knowledge: that, with the ex- ception of mathematical truths, and of those arts which are founded on mathematical prin- ciples, there subsists scarcely one subject either of physics, of metaphysics, or of physio- logy, the science of which is clearly un- derstood, as to the truth of which an uni- formity of opinion subsists. The essential at- tributes which different bodies possess, and the first and most simple elements of which they are composed, and the definitions by which those elements are characterized, continue to natural philosophers 11 philosophers points of constant controversy and disputation. If we extend our views from the primary and essential, to the secondary and accidental qua- lities of matter, to the last and most trifling branch of natural philosophy, to which the province of chemistry more especially belongs ; we shall find that although chemistry has occupied the thoughts of, and been pursued with zeal the most ardent by a great number of learned and en- lightened men in every part of Europe, that we notwithstanding continue completely ignorant of the principles on which chemistry, as a science, is founded. Without previous design, or by mere chance, as it may be called, we have, it is true, discover- ed, that when different substances, such as acids and alcalies, for example, are brought in contact, that an union between them takes place ; we are by experience taught, that different bodies have a stronger disposition to unite together, to the exclusion of others with which they may have been . Ill been combined; of the cause why these sepa- rations are produced and new combinations formed— on what principle the doctrine of elec- tive attraction, or chemical affinity is founded, we are totally ignorant. By the Researches of Professor Davy, in the art of chemistry, a multitude of opinions, which by chemists had been received as fundamental truths, have been overturned and exposed: he has proved that a great portion of the chemical knowledge, not only of former times, but of the present day, is erroneous in some of its most essential points ; and it is now become a com- mon observation amongst our best chemists, that in consequence of these new discoveries, chemists will be probably obliged to trace back the road of error which they have so long tra- versed, in order to learn afresh the first princi- ples of their art.* * The Monthly Marine for the present month very justly observes, " that Dr. Davy's Chemical Lectuies shew that stu- dents in chemistry have to unlearn most of what they have re- ceived as authority in that science. It may be hoped therefore it It is greatly to be lamented that the pursuits of the chemists, instead of being confined to their proper objects — to the examination of the qua- lities of matter dead and common — have been equally but improperly directed and extended to the investigation of living matter also ; hoping thereby to explore the causes of animation and of vital action from chemical phenomena, the inevitable attributes of decomposition and de- cay.* It has been with this vain expectation that every solid and fluid of which vegetables and animals are composed have been analysed with the most accurate nicety ; and effects attempted to be explained from the result of decomposition and of death, which altogether depend on vita- lity and animation. To this total inversion of all that we shall have no other voluminous systems of this variable science, till its elementary principles are somewhat better settled." * In deprecating as I do experiments, it is proper that I should he clearly understood. I deprecate the application of chemistry to physiology, as much as I would deprecate the prac- tice of employing the phenomena of death in order to explain principles principle with respect to the relation which ex- ists between things external to the animated system, and the animated system itself, is to be ascribed, the absolute ignorance which pre- vails, not only of the function of digestion, but of the operation of medicine also ; not only of every organ, but of every fluid of which the system is composed. Until physiologists are made to feel that physiology is still an art, not a science; and pathologists that the practice of medicine is altogether empirical; untill the state of eiTor and of ignorance which exists is truly and fairly represented, 1 see no hopes whatever of improvement or of reformation. the actions of life; and more especially I deprecate the experi- ments made on different organs and fluids of the living system, because the natural and healthy functions of a part can never be ascertained through the medium of mutilation or extirpa- tion ; but with respect lo the investigation of matter dead and common, experiment alone is the medium through which its properties and attributes can be attained. I think it proper to give this explanation in order that I may not have it thrown in my teeth that I reprobate experimental philosophy in gene- ral, the odium of which I am persuaded would otherwise be at- tempted to be fixed on me. Much VI Much as there is to deplore with respect to the application of physiology to practice, it is as a feather in the balance, when compared to the relation which it is supposed to bear to metaphysics. Instead of tracing the relation which the different organs bear to each other, as the means that are employed with a view to ends; instead of exploring the nature of life, and more especially of intellect or of soul, — of that principle by which man is more especially characterized from every other animal, and by the proper exercise of which he is able to abstract him- self from matter and from sense ; it is to the at- tributes of matter alone, impelled by sensible objects, to which the existence of mind is gene- rally ascribed, and the doctrine of materialism, in its fullest extent, attempted to be established. Although the doctrine of materialism is not proclaimed in our philosophical schools in word, I will maintain that it is so indeed. I will main- tain that the existence of any immaterial or spiritual principle, is seldom, if ever, so much as mentioned,much less employ ed as constituting the cause Vll cause of organization or of intellection ; on the con- trary that it is to the organization alone, and to the matter of which that organization is composed, that the principles of life and of mind, as effects, are immediately referred. This evil spirit, if it dared, would even manifest itself within the bosom of our universities.— Within the last few months two members belonging to one of the principal colleges in Oxford, publish- ed a book entitled " The Necessity of Atheism" and they even had the audacity to attempt a de- fence of the principles it contained, before a con- vocation appointed to examine them: these mis- guided men have been very properly expelled from the university, and the wretched trash which they had written has been suppressed.* It has been the object of my most particular solicitude to expose the errors of such pursuits, * I think it right to mention this fact as an illustration, more than as a proof, of the truth of my assertions. Whatever blame might formerly be imputed to the laxity of University morals, or University discipline, has been corrected, and the system of edu- cation now pursued bids fair to answer the end for which it was originally designed. and Vlll and to point out the evils to which they lead ; to shew that such a system, instead of leading to truth, not only recedes from it, but perpe- tuates and establishes what is infinitely worse than ignorance —erroneous principles: that in- stead of exploring the essential properties of matter with relation to the system of order and subordination which exists throughout the whole system of nature, secondary qualities alone obtained by artificial means, are the objects of our present pursuits: instead of contemplating the attributes of the Creator from the works of Creation, it is through the medium of unnatural phenomena alone, that natural phsenomena are attempted to be explained. I complain that the present system of what is called phi- losophy, is an artificial not a natural one; and that the very first dictum, or aphorism, pro- claimed by Lord Bacon in his Novum Organum, is altogether violated by our philosophers. — " Homo Natura minister et interpres, tan turn facit & intelligit, quantum de naturae ordine, re- vel mente observaverit ; nee amplius scit aut potest" I corn- IX I complain that instead of making (as true philosophy must ever tend to do), man religious ; it is at variance with religion, and deprives him of the benefit and of the comforts which reli- gion is calculated to bestow : that instead of leading man to God, it estranges God from man, and separates, to the utmost possible distance, (if I may be allowed the expression), the soul from the Deity. In proof of my assertions, I would appeal to the notorious neglect of pub- lic worship by those who consider themselves what the French call philosophes, as well as by a great proportion of professional men who are considered to possess, in the highest degree, the philosophy or the* science of the profession. By them I am persuaded, I shall be viewed with derision and with scorn for having entered upon the subject of theology. I am, however, willing to suffer their reproach* with the hope that to others it may call to their recollection one of the principal ends for which they were created. With With respect to the chapter on Organic Life, or the means by which those ends are attained, it is for the most part a mere syllabus of my system of Physiology.* * It was first written with a view of exposing the folly and errors of the Brunonian doctrine, which was at that time in ge- neral estimation in this country, as it still continues to be over different parts of the continent. It is not likely that any sys- tem of physiology which took for its principle the power of life and the aptitude of matter — which traced the phaenomena of vitality from organization to action, and investigated the par- ticular organs as the instruments by which ends were obtain- ed, would be very well received by those who begin with death, and who end with life. Notwithstanding the new opinions which it proclaimed it was generally well spoken of, and by the medical Review it was observed, " that in the execution of the extensive work before us, Mr. Saumarez is in many parts original ; it is however but justice to add, that a? passion for novelty does not appear to have led him to a hasty adoption of opinions on slight or trivial grounds. His arguments are in general well support- ed and his conclusions cautiously deduced. As a whole, it, certainly bespeaks the industry and genius of a writer who dares to think for himself, unfettered by prejudice and authority, &c." again, " we are not sorry to see the errors of the Brunonian system thus combated by an able champion ; it happens with this theory, more than with any former one, that its errors are not merely speculative, but lead to the greatest possible mistakes. Indeed it would be no easy matter to calculate the mischief which it has occasioned in the hands of young and inexperienced practitioners; but when we find, from Dr. Beddoes himself, the translator, its ascendency over men's miflds in different parts Before xi Before I conclude I may perhaps be permit- ted to say a few words of myself. Although incessantly employed in the discharge of the duties of my profession, it will not be imputed to me that I neglect any opportunity to acquire whatever information in it which is to be ob- tained. I acknowledge with thanks my obliga- tion to those who supply me with new facts, although I feel myself compelled to deny the conclusions which are often deduced from them. I deplore, as every professional man must do, the imperfect state of medical knowledge, and the little improvement which medical science has undergone. It is from a firm persuasion that the present system is radically wrong that 1 have ven- tured to point out some of its errors. Many of my brethren, for whom I entertain the greatest friendship, will, I fear, reprobate my conduct in disclosing " the secrets of the prison house," and proclaiming to the world truths which of Europe, and that in the celebrated University of Pavia, there is hardly a student endowed with talents who is not a Brunonian, it is surely high time to examine its principles and refute its errors, &c. &c, many Xll many of them will think ought to be concealed. I nevertheless feel that my motives are beyond the reach of impeachment, and that the igno- rance which I impute to them I acknowledge to participate myself. In the sincere hope that I may do some good in correcting much error, and more especially that I may be instrumental in diverting some of the younger part of the pro- fession from the system of materialism, to which the science of physiology at present unques- tionably tends, I am willing to bear the criti- cism and derision which I must expect. I have no private motives to answer ; I have only in view the general good. The facts which 1 have assumed for principles, and the conclusions which I have deduced from them are fair ob- jects of animadversion. I have made the at- tack and shall be ready to enter upon my de- fence: I nevertheless have to request indulgence from the reader, not only for the hurried style evident in many parts, but for many verbal and typographical errors, which often obscure the meaning ; the most material of these will be cor- rected in the leaf of errata at the beginning of the book Xlll book. It is now my intention to proceed with the second part of the subject, and to give the physical or natural history of common matter: it will not be so much my object to add new facts to old principles, as to give new principles to old facts.* I shall endeavour to prove that the matter of fire, instead of being simple and elementary is compounded and factitious ; instead of according to the Newtonian hypothesis of light and colours viz. that the colour of a body proceeds from the rays which are repelled, and not absorbed, I shall show that the colour of every body pro- ceeds from the matter of light having united with the body from whence it is reflected and by becoming tinged and dyed with it, the colour- ing matter is conveyed to the eyes; and that black and white instead of being negatives or non-entities, are as absolute and positive as any other colours that exist, and that it is by the * It may be proper to observe to the unscientific reader that the word physics does not mean medical but natural, and when I speak of the physical proportion of bodies, I mean those that are natural and essential, not such as are ?ncdicinaL other XIV union of the solar rays with atmospheric matter that the different prismatic colours for the most part are produced. That the solar matter, as far as we have any cognisance of it, is altogether different in its nature from any matter belonging to our mundane system, that it is destitute of fire and colour altogether, but possesses the essen- tial attributes alone of transparency and motion; that instead of having gravity or weight, it moves with the most incredible velocity in every direc- tion, in opposition to the laws of gravitation, which to the sun are so hypothetically ascribed ; that the hypothesis which concludes that the sun is a gravitating body, attracting by its gra- vitating matter the whole of the planetary sys- tem, is founded on false assumptions, not only without proof but contrary to proof. That it is by the energy which is imparted to different bodies by the solar rays, that the processes of vaporization and gasification are carried on in a natural state; that the essential properties of every gas is that of expansibility, by which it dilates and expands in every direction from a centre to a circumference; that the weight which is ascribed to gaseous matter is an artificial not a na- XV a natural property ; and that the degree of ex- pansibility not of weight is the standard by which its powers ought to be meted or measured; and I shall shew by the most simple, and yet the most decisive experiments, that the elevation of the mercury in the torricellian tube, as well as other fluids in exhausting pumps, are not caused by the weight or gravity of the atmosphere, and consequently that the term Barometer, so uni- versally employed is an erroneous one. I shall endeavour to shew that although wa- ter forms one of the constituent materials of which gases are composed; that gases are nevertheless not the constituent materials alone, of which water is formed, that although it is frequently decomposed and deposited out of them, it is * When I first began this book I merely intended to confine myself to this part of the subject; I however found, as I went on, that the different branches of physical knowledge are so in- timately woven with each other, that it is difficult to understand any one point properly without some knowledge of the whole. I found it necessary, for example, to distinguish mere capacity, or passivity from flexibility ; flexibility from elasticity; and finally elasticity itself from expansibility, subsisting as an inherent power. This explanation will, I hope, excuse me for the arrangement in one part being somewhat different from what I should other- wise have made. not XVI not caused by them ; and finally that gravity, gravitation, or weight, is a relative, not a posi- tive or absolute term ; that the gravity or weight of a body altogether depends on the nature of the medium in which it is placed; that instead of extending beyond, is altogether confined to it. I hope therefore to shew, that the ipse dixit of Sir I. Newton, which constitutes his fourth law of nature, is altogether unfounded, viz. that allbodiesaremutually heavy and gravitate towards each other; that this gravity is 'proportionate to the quantity of matter \ and at unequal distances is inverstely as the squares of the distances" Although I am nearly prepared, I nevertheless think it more prudent to delay publishing this second part until the present one has gone through the ordeal which it must suffer. I have only to add that, whilst on the one hand I shall feel grateful and thankful for fair and liberal criticism, I shall however be ready to re- pel, and to give the " retort courteous," to those who impatient of contradiction, consider any in- novation in long established systems as deserving of condemnation, however contrary to common sense they may be demonstratively proved. CHAPTER I 3N T THE PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICAL SCIENCE. JlN order to prosecute to a successful termina- tion any branch of science, it is of the utmost im- portance, that we should be in full possession of the first principles on which that science de- pends, as causes from whence the effects pro- ceed, and that the definitions employed should be determinate and precise, expressive of the thing signified. * This previous and antecedent knowledge not only comprehends the existence of the subject itself, and the terms by which its b existence 2 existence is known ; as that a human being is a a biped, a horse a quadruped, &c. but the various attributes belonging to it ; these attributes are either inherent and essential, or accidental and transient : these by some have been called ac- cidents, by others secondary qualities. If the nature of them were examined it would be found that they owe their existence more to the agency of external things than to any property resident within them. It is not from the accidental colour of the skin which different beings possess, whe- ther pallid or red, by which the species in gene- ral is characterized. The external colour may be imitated by art on a lump of clay, or a block of wood, upon a dead almost as perfectly as on a living subject. It is to those permanent and indelible attributes of organization and of form of action, and of power, by which every indivi- dual is known to be what it really is, and through which it is distinguished from every thing else. Such was the state of barbarism and ignorance which filled the human mind for more than a thou- sand Tw-|^,. - l sand years, and which has been in consequence de- nominated the period of the dark ages, that know- ledge, if knowledge it maybe called, was confined to the schoolmen : the erroneous practice in gene- ral, at that period, of reasoning without facts, and drawing conclusions from false principles, became at length apparent to that great lumi- nary of our country, Lord Bacon. The accumulation of error was at that time too extensive to be corrected by any individual, however mighty in intellect he might be sup- posed. Instead of unravelling the gordian knot he cut it. Instead of amusing himself with solving the most absurd and ridiculous proposi- tions that can be conceived; with calculating, for example, how many millions of angels could dance upon the point of a needle, he determin- ed to accumulate facts only, before he gene- ralized them, and the art of induction was rais- ed on the ruins of false syllogism. It is greatly to be deplored that the plan which he himself pursued, has not been adhered to by b 2 his his followers in general; that attention is not so much paid to the simple observation of na- tural phenomena as to those which are the re- sults of sophisticated experiments. I do not decry experiments in general, it is the abuse not the use of them which I reprobate and condemn. It is through the agency of experiment that the useful arts have obtained such a high degree of elegance and perfection; that chemistry, and what is called experimental philosophy, in gene- ral, are in a constant state of improvement, and that the certainty of many uncertain things is ascertained. Let it not, however, be supposed that it is the result of experiment alone on which the whole of our knowledge depends, or that it was so considered by Lord Bacon himself; he expressly ranks natural history to be the result of simple observation, and classes it before ex- perimental history. He considered it to be the . iirst means which ought to be employed to ac- complish the grand instauration, as he calls it, which he had in view ; from induction, through the medium of analysis, to establish principles; from the individual to form the species, and from the the species the genus ; from history by analysis to obtain definitions, and proceeding from effects to arrive at causes. Had he been desirous to appeal to experiment alone, he would have excluded the facts which are the result of simple observation only ; if such had been his principles of learning it would have led, as it has been well observed, to the unwar- rantable length of supposing that knowledge could only be obtained through an artificial, rather than through a natural channel, assisted by the furnace and the crucible in the laboratory, to make no use of our eyes unless with a candle in our hands and spectacles on our nose, and forced to withdraw our senses from the know- ledge which they convey to the mind of the uu- disturbed appearances of nature. Instead however of appealing to simple ob- servation for the apprehension of natural pheno- mena, few phenomena are at this time supposed or admitted to be true, unless proved by the test of experiment; unnatural effects generally r 3 preferred 6 preferred before such as are natural and unso* phisticated. The phenomena of disease are ad- duced to explain the actions of health ; the che- mical changes which dead and common matter undergo are often assumed in order to account for the causes and phenomena of life. The error of endeavouring to account by chemical, by hydraulic, and other mechanical principles, for the phenomena of vital action, as well as the principle of vitality itself, may be assigned as the reason for the barbarous state which physiology is in at the present day. To the late Mr. J. Hunter, to Dr. Goodwin, Spallanzani, and a few others we are eminently indebted for many valuable facts obtained through the medium of experiment performed on living animals : these facts acquire their intrin- sic worth, in consequence of exposing to our view internal operations, which were before con- cealed, and thereby manifesting the natural con- dition of things without altering it. Cruel Cruel and horrible as were these experiments if they cannot be justified it is hoped that they will find considerable palliation in the motive which led to the execution of them ; — the earnest hope which a few of these gentlemen entertain- ed of bringing light out of darkness, and that the sufferings of the brute might ultimately prove beneficial to man. Although humanity feels a pang at the re- collection of such pursuits, they ought never- thelss to be tolerated to a certain degree, when performed by those who having an end in view, are anxious to prove, by the fact of experiment, the truth or error of the principles of physiolo- gical science, which they may entertain. To that numerous class of pretenders to phy- siology, to those minpws in science, who with- out end or design, are impelled by blind chance and mere curiosity to inflict the most barbarous cruelties in cold blood on warm blooded animals, there is no excuse; more than for those who mutilate and extirpate different organs out of b 4 the a the living system, in order to ascertain the na-^ tural functions which those organs are intended to perform, and the use which they are intend-* ed to serve. I do not mean in other points to depreciate the merit of many of those gentler men; I value it because in many respects they are entitled to praise. When I hear, however, some of them arrogate the claim of furnishing to the world all the phy^ siological knowledge in it, and as if alone qualified to discuss a physiological question, receiving with slight, and considering as mere drivellers those who take natural rather than aiv tificial phenomena, and whom they call, as a mark of contempt, closet philosopher, I confess to feel amused with the folly of such conceits. In order to appreciate the whole merit to which they are entitled, it ought to be examin- ed, and I am persuaded it will be found that the reason of this conceit and pride arises in consequence of mistaking art for science, the man who carries the hod for the architect who designs, 9 designs, and confounding the labourer and bellows-blower with the physiologist and meta- physician, I do not include the man who from a supe-r riority of intellect, possesses a knowledge of cause, foresees and foreknows the effects which will inevitably follow, and is nevertheless anxious to put his science to the test, and to prove the truth of it by experiment. A philosopher such as this is seldom qualified for the task of per- forming it, he rather delegates the execution of it to others than perform it himself. What are the qualifications, I would ask, which are requisite for the experimentalist in chemis try, who is Ho accomplish the trial? There is not, I am persuaded, an experienced artist in any of our manufactories, who is not able to mix the different ingredients which are intend- ed to be employed, to blow the. bellows, and even to decide on the result that ensues, as well as the best chemist that has ever existed. The 10 The same limited means are alone wanting in physiology ; there is not a lad of twenty years of age, who comes from the country to any of our hospitals in town, and who after passing with common industry two seasons in any of our anatomical schools, is not perfectly com- petent to perform any physiological experiments; in addition to a precise knowledge of position, the only requisites wanting are a steady hand, a sharp knife, a tolerable good pair of eyes, and an unfeeling heart. To rip open the flanks of a dog as well as of a calf, to drag any particular organ out of its situation, to paw and to squeeze it, to decide whether it swells or contracts, whether it causes presure or not on surrounding parts, to tie a ligature upon the vessels or tubes with which any organ is sup- plied, or to extirpate the organ altogether, and finally cut the animals throat and strip the skin for the sake of the leather, can, I am persuaded be performed as perfectly by any carcase but- cher in any slaughter house, as by the generali- ty of physiologists ; and 1 am of opinion that the 11 the execution of a job such as this, which is performed in less than an hour's time, which re- quires neither genius, judgement, or skill, would be most amply remunerated by the receipt of one shilling, and perhaps a pint of small beer as an act of generosity.* * In order to justify myself from exaggeration, and to enable the reader to decide for himself, how far I am justified in saying that the degrees of talent necessary to perform an experi- ment are very trifling, and that it is generally done with a degree pf qold blooded apathy which is shocking to humanity, I shall relate one, amongst a multitude of similar experiments, that were made on living dogs, in order to ascertain the change of colour which the blood underwent during the process of inspira- tion. " I procured several large dogs," says one of the gentle- men, " and after removing the sternum or breast bone of each, and exposing to view the trunks of thepulmonary arteries and veins, &c. &c." by another, and he by far the most eminent of all, after going through the preliminary operation of cutting the parie- tcs of the thorax, and sawing the ribs, and exposing to view the organs which it contains, says " I have repeated this experiment several times upon several animals, and commonly for half an hour at a lime; which was sufficient to allow me to make my observations with coolness and accuracy; it was curious to see in the first part of the experiment, the coronary arteries turn barker and darker; but on blowing air into the lungs the blood gradually resumed the florid red. 1 cut and sliced offa piece from the lungs, and found that the colour of the blood which came from the wound corresponded with the above effect." Men 12 Men such as these, however qualified they may be to act well, seldom think correctly. If I were to go into particulars, I could easily prove that the premises which they assume con- sisting for the most part of the mutilated and un- natural condition of things, can seldom convey to the mind data fit for physiological science; that the conclusions which they draw, however true they may be from the principles, are most er- I should not have dwelt upon this subject, had I not known that the piactice of torturing animals amongst young men is be- come of late very much the fashion ; such are the tender mercies which they have for themselves; and in order to prevent the poor creatures from the onty consolation left them, of expressing, by their cries, the anguish which they suffer, they first begin by cutting and 'dividing the nerves which subserve to the motion of the tongue and lower jaw, and by that means prevent the animal from howling. This piece of humanity is exactly analogous to that which Santerre possessed : during the massacrees in Paris, in theeariy part of the French revolution; at that he was commanding officer of the national guard, and it was in his power to have prevented the multi- tude of beings from being sacrificed ; he however remained quietly at table whilst innocent blood flowed in torrents: one of his satellites, by accident, put his foot on the tail of a little dog situated under the table, which occasioned the dog to squeak, Santerre in great agony reproached with bitterness the inhuma- nity and cruelty of the fellow for making the poor animal suffer. neous 13 roneousin themselves, so far as relates to the thing which they are intended to explain. The system of induction introduced by Lord Bacon, had not for its end, as many of his un- worthy followers have supposed, the mere ab- stract accumulation of facts; facts, isolated and unconnected, resemble the rough and raw r ma- terials which may be intended for the founda- tion of the most magnificent edifice; it is not however the carpenter who chips the timber, or mason who scrubs the roughness of the marble and gives it a polish, who are to be considered as the men of science, but him alone who from precise knowledge of principles and of jscJesefc, is able to direct those materials to be arranged with symmetry into order and form. Had his lordship limited his views to induc- tion only, or had he cherished an hope through a multitude of forced and unnatural effects, that he would ever be able to establish true principles of science, instead of being the father of true philosophy, 14 philosophy, as he has been called i he would have been its greatest enemy* In the analysis of facts which are intended to constitute the principles of any science, it is of the first importance that none should be admitted but such as are scientifically effici- ent of the conclusion; that we should separate partial from* general facts, accidental and tran- scient attributes from those that are permanent and essential. It is by a process such as this that we become possessed of those individual facts which form the base and the source of every science, the immediate and proximate cause from whence effects are derived. It is by the enumeration of these attributes, which always abiding in the subject to which they belong, apply universally to every individual of the species, characterise its nature, and distin- guish it from a body belonging to every other class : w ithout the full possession of these per- manent and universal facts, a general, not a par- ticular knowledge, of any subject can ever be obtained : without history we can never have de- finition, 15 finition, and without axiom there can be no science. It is from principles such as these, of self evident truth, on which the whole mathema- tical science is founded, as well as every other branch which deserves the name of science. Without the possession of these first principles it has ever appeared to me impossible that we can obtain any science of the phenomena which are produced; without them a general, not a particular knowledge may be acquired; we may become historians but not philosophers, good artists but not men of science : knowledge properly so called, does not simply consist in the impressions made on the senses by the ope- ration of external phenomena ; true knowledge can only be admitted to exist when we are in full possession of the cause from whence the ef- fects are derived, and he alone can be denomi- nated the man of science, who is able to connect the cause and the effect together. These 16 These principles are not only more powerful and true than the thing produced, but the actual cause of its production : they possess the power of imparting their own efficacy and energy to the bodies on which they operate, and constitute the science from whence secondary effects are made to flow; by which the principles of life, for ex- ample, which is resident in the semina of plants, or in the ova of animals, is enabled to act on matter dead and common, and to con£e#t it to a living state, by which the sun, as the principle and fountain of light becomes the primary cause of illumination in general ; by which the expan- sibility of air is enabled to excite motion in matter passive and inert. In every instance it appears to me necessary that no fact whatever should be admitted as a principle, but such as is scientifically efficient to produce the conclusion, so that the effect produced should always cor- respond to the nature of the producing cause.* * I am not speaking at present of the changes which take place in bodies by the agency of chemical means, by which the effect produced participates of the nature of the several mate- rials which may have been employed j I confine myself at pre- Al- 17 Although it is unquestionably true that there exists several different sciences that may be said to belong to one and the same genus, in which the principles of the one may be legitimately transferred to the other, it is nevertheless very seldom the case. Principles of science do not emigrate, as migratory birds are in the habit of doing, at different seasons, to different countries ; individual sciences, for the most parr; have belonging to them their own facts and their own principles ; the conduct of those who take false analogies for the explanation of the same phe- nomena, and the principles of dissimilar sciences, with a view of accounting for the effects which are produced in those to which they have no re- lation, cannot be too strongly reprobated and condemned. If the mere capacity which appertains to dif- ferent species of common matter, or even the chemical power which it may be supposed to sent lo the physical and natural power which different bodies possess of acting upon others without being acted upon by them. c possess, 18 , possess, were employed, as is too often the case, in order to account for the cause of vitality, if in the animated system, the principles of hydraulics were employed to account for the motion of the fluids, those of pneumatics for the process of res- piration ; in short, if the principles of chemical science were advanced in order to prove the na- ture of vital action in general, and of ratiocination in particular facts or principles, such as these, would unquestionably be false. The same con- clusions may be made if the principles of vitality in plants were adduced to prove the principles of instinct in brutes ; or the principles of instinct in brutes employed to ascertain the nature of intellect in man. Facts such as these, having no reference whatever to the particular subject which they were intended to demonstrate, and being in themselves inefficient and defective to prove the conclusion; that is to say, that the principle of intellect in man cannot be proved by the nature of brutal instinct, more than the vitality of plants proved from the chemical properties of matter dead and common ; facts such as these, when employed as principles, must 19 must ever be considered as false, and in such a case physiology and physics, chemistry and me- taphysics would be confounded together. The same may be said if the facts which apper- tain to vision, were employed io account for the cause of hearing, and those of taste by the mouth with those which belong to the olfactory sense, &c. If T proceed from physiological to mechanical sciences, the same observations will equally ap- ply if the principles of hydraulics were employ- ed to account for the effects produced in pneu- matics, and even if those of pneumatics were advanced to prove the nature of optics, such facts would be false ; as false as if we were to confound the facts which appertain to time with those that belong to place, figures with lines and lines with figures, and attempt to prove mag- nitude by numbers or numbers by magnitude, and confound geometry and arithmetic together; it would seem to have been for the express pur- pose of guarding against this great error, that Sir Isaac Newton, in his universal arithme- c 2 tic, 20 tic, praises the ancients for not deducing geo- metrical conclusions from arithmetical princi- ples, and for not confounding geometry and arithmetic together. " Each of these sciences,' * says he, "possessing principles peculiar to it- self, and distinct from other sciences." What other construction can these words bear, than that he who employs the primary and perma- nent facts which constitute the principles, or the axioms (as I may call them) of every indivi- dual science, in order to account for the effects which are produced by the power of the facts or principles belonging to another, between which there is no analogy whatever takes, false facts for his data. False facts may therefore be considered facts which are assumed as false principles, false causes to which effects are im- properly referred: the phrase by the driveller will either be misunderstood or by him consi- dered as an absurdity; by the ignorant in science, as contrary to appearances, but not an absolute contradiction, as a paradox but not a non-en- tity; by the man of real science the phrase will be admitted as legitimate and appropriate, and be 21 be by him constantly appealed to as the true and primary cause of error, and of mistake, not only at the beginning but at its end; and he will ascribe to false facts the mass of false philoso- phy which continues to prevail at this day. I have perhaps dwelt longer on this subject than was necessary; I was, however, led to it in consequence of the complete ignorance which the subject appeared to be involved in by those who ought, from their situation, to have been bet- ter instructed ; the idea of false facts by them was not only decried but attempted to be ridiculed. Having endeavoured to shew what true prin- ciples are, and what false principles are not ; I shall now proceed to point out the errors of taking false analogies as principles of sci- ence: wherever an uniformity of nature and of character exists between different bodies analogy becomes a legitimate source of induc- tion, it is from the analogy which subsists,be- tween the phenomena of life and health, of dis- c 3 ease 22 ease and death in plants, that these may often be employed to illustrate the correspondent changes which take place in brutes as well as in the hu- man species ; and also when a similarity of na- ture exists between bodies whose functions are the same, however dissimilar they may be in structure and appearance. By analogy we pre- dicate the same attributes to the gills of fish as i to the lungs of the mammalia, to the ovaries of a sprat and of a whale, as we do to the ovary of a rabbit or of an elephant. And it is be- cause geometry defines many of the assumptions and suppositions of the science of optics, as well as of other sciences that might be stated, why analogy between them may often be adr mitted. Analogy maybe admitted throughout the vari- ous species of common matter which exists, whose nature and properties are the same, how- ever different in appearance they may be ; be- tween the capacity of a lump of clay and of a piece of flint, between the flexibility of lead and of iron, between the elasticity of steel and of whalebone, and 23 and between the expansibilityof gases in general however different. The reason why analogy between these different genera is admissible is this, that however different their particular properties may be, they nevertheless always con- tinue to retain the same generic character ; al- though the chemical characters of particular gases are proved to be totally different from others, all however are expansible; the same may be said of elastic, and of flexible bodies also. In bodies such as these Sir Isaac Newton's second rule of philosophizing may apply, that " of natural effects of the same kind the same causes are to be assigned:" It must however be very obvious that this rule can never be ap- plied to bodies whose nature and properties are essentially different from each other, and between which no analogy whatever exists. It must appear most obvious that no ana- logy can exist between bodies whose nature and properties are essentially different; and that c 4 the 24 the predications which belong to one cannot be applied to the other. It is not legitimate to make analogy between flexible and elastic, more than between elastic and expansible bodies; much less between matter which is ponderable or dark, and such as is imponderable and lumin- ous; that is passive and opake, and that which is essentially active and transparent; between a cloud of dust and the rays of light, between the natural obscurity of this globe of earth and the illumination and splendor of the sun. CHAP. CHAPTER II. ON THE NATURE AND PROPERTIES OF MATTER IN GENERAL. XF we were to take a particular review of the system of nature we should be led to conclude that a regular chain of order and of subordina- tion subsists, not only throughout the various classes of animated beings it contains, but be- tween the different parts of the common matter of which it is composed. The analogy which subsists between the different links of this vast chain is so close, and the gradation so imperceptible and easy, that it is often very difficult to say at what point the one ends and the other begins; what are the precise marks 26 marks by which some parts of the animal kingdom are distinguished from the vegetable, some species of the vegetable from the mineral, until its final termination into matter the most formless and common. Great and striking as the similitude may be between the parts, there nevertheless subsist shades of difference throughout the whole ; in- somuch that when the extremes are compared, instead of analogy there is a total difference be- tween them. Owing to the obvious difference in the sensible properties which different bodies display, differ- ent arrangements of them have been made, and the whole of the material world has been classed under three different orders, or kingdoms, into animal, vegetable, and mineral. A generalization such as this, appears to me highly objectionable, because extremely defec- tive. Instead of comprehending the whole it ex- cludes a.part, it excludes that immense and in- definite 27 definite portion of matter, which, instead of be- ing mined and immured within the bowels of the earth, subsists for the most part out of it; it not only excludes water, and gaseous bodies in general, but the whole planetary system in particular. I shall therefore class the whole system of na- ture, as it has been called, and the matter of which it is composed under three distinct heads, — of common, — of living, — and of dead matter. First, By common matter I mean the primitive or original materials or elements of which theworld is composed ; matter which either has never re- ceived the participation of life, or having receiv- ed has lost it, and been resolved back into a a common state. Secondly, By living matter I comprehend the various orders of living beings, with which the universe is replenished and adorned. Thirdly,By dead matter I confine myself to the exuviae of animals and of vegetables ; as well as to 23 the whole substance of which these beings are composed after the actions of life are at an end, and the state present known by the appellation of death. Among the first advances that were made of putting confusion into order, of arranging the in- finite multitude of individuals to particular species, and different species to particular genera, may be mentioned the art of analysis. By ana- lysis the attributes which individuals in common possess, are solved. Classifications of them are formed to which those individuals,according to the general character and mode of subsistence, may easily be referred, as they severally exist in a solid, a liquid, or a gaseous state. To ascertain the nature of these attributes, the relation which they bear to each other, the changes which they undergo, and finally to trace the phenomena, or effects, to their producing causes, constitute the objects which physical science is designed to explore, and become the true pursuit of a natural philosopher. To 29 To physiology the province belongs of inves- tigating the properties of living matter. To physics such as is dead or common. Correspon- dent to the difference of character which sub- sits in matter dead or common, whether solid, liquid, or gaseous, a subdivision in the science of physics is made. Geology refers to the solid and common matter of which the world is composed. Hydrology to liquid, and meteorology to that which subsists in a gaseous or aeriform state ; and finally, chemistry is designed to examine and to ascertain the more intimate and particu- lar qualities which each substance possesses, and the changes it undergoes by union and com- bination; the means employed are those of ana- lysis and synthesis. It is not my present intention to enter into a chemical investigation of the subject, I mean more especially to confine myself to an enquiry into the essential and individual properties which subsist in each, by virtue of which the mechani- cal changes which those bodies undergo, are to be ascertained. Although 30 Although their natural properties are obvi- ously and sensibly different, and that an infinite variety of changes in them are perpetually taking place, that the most solid bodies are often liqui- fied into a fluid, and subtilized into vapour, that vapours are often condensed into a liquid, and even into a solid form: in whatever state how- ever, these bodies may exist, every particle possesses one attribute common to the whole, the attribute of extension; extension into length, breadth, and thickness. If we proceed from this attribute, universal to the attributes particular, which different bodies possess, we shall find them to be totally differ- ent from each other, and that a great diversity of changes between them are constantly taking place; a distinction ought therefore to be made between the natural and unnatural state in which any portion of matter exists ; between the change which is produced and the cause pro- ducing it, between passion (passivity) and ac- tion, capacity and power. So 31 So totally and absolutely inert is the solid mat- ter of which the world is composed, that it pos- sesses within itself no power by which it can act, neither the mass altogether more than the smallest particle of sand would alter in form or in position, unless it were acted upon by agents external to itself. It is in consequence of this natural tendency to remain permanently the same, that solid matter is said to be imbecil and inert, of- fering resistance alone to the action of those bodies by which it may be assailed : it is to this natural property of solid matter to which the term im- mobility ought especially to be applied. Whenever solid matter is acted upon and the resistance which it opposes is overcome, the changes which it is made to undergo perpetual- ly wear away, the matter gradually verges from the state of activity into which it had been ex- cited, into the passive and quiescent state which is natural to it : this is the end which invariably takes place when one mass of solid matter is made to act upon another, the first loses as much of its own motion as it imparts to the second, 32 second, insomuch that the quantity of change which is excited in the one, entirely depends on the quantity of power communicated from the other. This capacity to be acted upon, this indifference to motion or rest is called mobility and the change which the body undergoes dur- ing the transition from one place to another is called motion.* The effect which is produced by a moving power on a solid substance, altogether depends on the nature of its construction. If it cracks or breaks without yielding it is said tobebrittle,such as glass or flint. When a body yields with- out cracking it is considered as flexible, this is the case with lead, with iron, and with a variety of other bodies which it is unnecessary for me to detail. This capacity to be bent by the agency of ex- ternal forces, which particular bodies contain, * " It is surprising Mr. Locke should have misapplied, as he has done, the term mobility, and confounded capacity and power together. Mobility he calls a power to be moved, instead of a capacity or aptitude to be moved. In like manner Sir Isaac Newton calls it a vis inertia?. without 33 without possessing any inherent power of un- bending themselves, is therefore called flexi- bility; or as Dr. Johnson expresses it " the qua- lity of admitting to be bent." The nature of this capacity to be acted upon is exemplified in a common piece of iron or of wood. The particles of matter of which these substances are composed are unable to resist the power which acts upon them. The inferior strata become contracted, the upper lengthened, both are distorted and bent, and finally if the external force be encreas- ed beyond a certain point, the bond of conti- nuity between the individual particles, becomes separated and the iron or wood snaps or breaks. The whole effect which has been thus produced, is evidently to be referred, not to a power resi- dent in the iron or wood, but to the agency of the external force impressed upon them ; it was resistance overcome by overcoming force. ■ This capacity of admitting to be bent and to be moved by an external force, extends to other bodies which have the power of restoring themselves to their former situation, after the t> external 34 external force is removed, through the agency of which they had been made flexible : bodies such as these are called elastic; of this description may be enumerated steel, whalebone, catgut, &c. &c. The distinction therefore which exists be- tween elasticity and flexibility consists in this, elasticity has the capacity to be ben t and the power to restore itself to its natural and original situa- tion from whence it had been forcibly distorted, and withheld; whilst flexibility on the contrary has the capacity to be bent only, without the power of unbending itself. Dr. Johnson, there- fore, with that wonderful power of discrimina- tion which on every occasion he is found to possess, very properly defines elasticity to con- sist of a " force in bodies by which they endea- vour to restore themselves to the position from whence they were displaced by an external forced By the substraction of which, such is the peculiarity in the arrangement of which the elastic substance is composed, that it has the power of returning back to the position it was in before, in which condition it remains. That 33 That the return to its original situation only of the elastic body by the substraction of the external force, is the true meaning and applica- tion of the word elasticity, is further proved by Sir Isaac Newton. In his book on optics he says, " when a body is compact, and bends or yields inward to pressure, without any sliding of its parts, it is hard and elastic, returning to its figure with a force arising from the united attraction of its parts." If we therefore examine the defini- tion of the word elasticity as given by Johnson and illustrated by Newton, and as it is generally used at this day, we must conclude that it is not only retained within the narrow limits to which the fibres are confined, but that it is never exerted without the intervention of external power impressed upon it. Elasticity conse- quently consists of two properties, of weak; ess and of power, of passion and of action, of suf- fering to be, and of becoming to be, of flexibility through the agency of external force, and se- condly of re-action from internal and inherent construction, as when Shakespear says, " when splitting winds, make flexible the knees of d 2 knotted 36 knotted oaks;" the splitting winds constitute the external cause, by which the flexible knees of knotted oaks were made to bend. Such how- ever is the internal construction of the fibres oi which the oak is composed, that they are able to return back to their original state, as soon as the splitting winds have ceased to rage. It is this dead capacity of being acted upon, and of being changed without the power of re- sisting action, of being moved without the power of moving itself, of being modelled without the power of modelling itself, which consti- tutes the mobility of Locke, the vis inertiae of Newton, the flexibility and elasticity of our mo- dern philosophers.* * " This capacity to be acted upon is proved in a manner the most decisive, by the commutation total and compleat which food undergoes, not only with respect to quantity but to quality also ; not only with respect to configuration in general, but to essential properties in particular, by the digestive and assimilating organs, with which animals and vegetables are endowed. Hav- ing detailed at considerable length the nature and relation which subsist between capacity and power in my system of physiolo- gy ; to that work, I must refer the reader, if he be desirous to understand the nature and power of life in converting the capa- if 37 If I proceed from flexible and elastic bodies, to consider the attributes of those which are essentially expansible, although they possess in common with the former, the capacity to be be bent into different forms, and even to be compressed from a larger to a smaller volume, by the agency of an external force, they neverthe- less differ from both in points the most essen- tial ; instead of requiring the agency of external pressure, in order that they may be enabled to unbend and expand, external pressure alone is the means by which this expansive power is bounded and confined ; instead of being like flexible and elastic bodies naturally passive and inert, they are naturally elastic and expansible ; elastic by pressure, expansible without it. The in- stant external pressure is removed, this ex- pansive power is immediately developed from its confinement and displayed by its activity, spreading and dilating to the utmost limits which city of matter from a dead to a living state, from a state of dis- persion to a state of combination, from a multitude of parts into one organized system, endowed with animation and action." d 3 ima- 38 imagination can conceive, communicating mo. tion to the mobility of particular bodies, and pressure to all, It is this original and essential power which abiding in gaseous and aeriform bodies, gives them the generic character of expansibility, strictly so called; which identifies their nature and designates them from those belonging to every other class. The distinctions between them are as great as they are important ; the jnotic-n or force which is manifested by steel and other bodies considered as elastic, is al- together produced by the unnatural direction given to the particles of matter of which they are composed; the expansibility of gaseous bodies proceeds from the spontaneous and na- tural tendency inherent in them. In the one the direction of the motion always corresponds to the particular direction of the particles of mat- ter of which the elastic substance is constituted. In the other the dilatation which takes place ex- tends equally in every direction. In the former the degree of motion produced is confined within 39 within the narrowest limits ; in the latter the expansibility is indefinite in its extent ; whilst external force is necessary to make an elastic body expansible; it is by the substraction of an ex- ternal force that expansible bodies are enabled to expand. Elasticity therefore is merely vi effecto, a power derived, not essential, an excit- ed not inherent power, which immediately ceases as soon as the compressing cause is removed. In matter, however, which is essentially ex- pansible, it is far otherwise, instead of vi effecto, it is causa motus ; not derived from with^ out, but which subsists inherently within ; not produced by external means, it is through the resistance alone, opposed by external means that this expansive power can be sus- pended or suppressed. The difference may be proved by simply placing a flexible, an elastic and an expansible body together, under the same relative situations ; if a small portion of air en- closed in a large bladder is placed under the receiver of an air pump with a piece of lead or steel, the change which the air undergoes is to- tally different from that of the other two. In d 4 40 proportion as the air within the receiver exter- nal to these bodies is abstracted by exhaustion ; it is found that neither the steel nor lead under- go any change whatever ; on the contrary the air within the bladder dilates and expands to its utmost extent. What the extent is to which air may be expanded, can only be proved by the effect which it produces. However difficult may be the task to bring such an enquiry to a successful conclusion, we may nevertheless form some notion of the de- gree, by the rapidity of its motion, and the resis- tance which it is capable to overcome. Mr. Boyle is of opinion that it was capable of expanding in the proportion of one to one thousand times ; that is to say, that one cubic foot of air, when external pressure is removed, is capable of dilating and filling the space often thousand feet: by others this calculation is considered far too limit- ed. Sir Isaac Newton, in particular, considers it almost indefinite ; extending perhaps to one millionth fX*T of its original bulk. If we re- flect for a moment on the energy which a power 41 power such as this must exert, we shall be at no loss to conceive the resistance which it is capable to overcome ; we shall be at no loss to conceive how it is that the air which is extricated from animal and vegetable bodies during the pro- cess of putrefaction and fermentation, has the power to separate and decompose the whole in- to parts, and finally to resolve those parts from a dead to a common state; that corks are ejected from bottles, and the bottles themselves are fissured and broken to pieces, in which ef- fervessing liquors are contained ; that the small quantity of air which is extricated from gun- powder during the process of detonation is en- abled to sap and to undermine the strongest fortifications ; to project out of the mouth of a can- non a ball to the immense distance of two or three miles ; to explode the strongest shell from a mortar; to burst it into pieces, and carry death and destruction to surrounding objects. In the various and multiplied discussions on this subject, which I have had with numbers ©f scientific men, and more especially with many 42 many of my particular friends, who fill the teacher's chair in some of our most celebrated schools of science in this metropolis, I have not found an individual amongst the whole mass who had any conception of expansibility subsist- in gas an inherent and essential power, — of expan- sibility, independently of resistance. The ut- most extent of the knowledge they possess was limited to re-action alone ; to that sort of power which is derived in consequence of external pressure. It will perhaps appear still more as- tonishing that a distinction so strong, and so well defined should not only have been overlooked, but that scarcely any of them at this moment are willing to admit it It appears very probable to me that the pre- sent prejudices are the mere result of former errors, handed down to us through the medium of Professor Gravesand, and other commenta- tors on Sir Isaac Newton's laws of nature, as they have been called, who was the original legatee. So far, however, from considering these laws to be laws of nature; from all the attention which I have 43 I have been able to give them, I am bound to declare that they are mere assertions, contrary to nature ; mere abstract terms, which require a condition of things that in nature does not exist, but which nevertheless is to be p re-sup* posed.* That Sir Isaac Newton's third law of nature should apply, in order that re-action may be always equal and contrary to action ; that is, that the action of two bodies upon each other may be always equal and in contrary direc- tions. (Lex III . Actioni contrariam sempererit et aequalem esse reactionem ; sive corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse aequales et in partes contrarias dirigi.) It is absolutely neces- sary to suppose what is not, for the purpose of proving what is: it is necessary not only to sup- pose that space should subsist without matter, or matter without resistance; but that throughout * It is not my present intention, whatever I may be disposed hereafter to do, to enter into a formal examination of these laws, I shall merely notice them so far as I find them connected with my present subject, and operating against it. This reason wilt account for inverting the order of them, and for taking notice of the third law before the first and second, the 44 the system of nature either one species of matter alone should exist, or if different, that it should possess the same property, or at least the same power* If such were actually the case, the consequences * Sir Isaac Newton supposed, that the original construction of matter was solid, massy, impenetrable; that these solid primi- tive particles are incomparably harder than any porous bodies composed of them, and that they were so hard as never to break in pieces. Whilst the particles continue entire they may compose bodies of one and the same nature and texture,in all ages ; but should they wear away or break in pieces, the nature of all things depending on them would be changed. Water and earth compos- ed of old worn out particles, and fragments of particles, would not now be of the same texture with water and earth composed of entire particles in the beginning ; and therefore in order that nature may be lasting, the change of corporeal things is to be placed in the various separations and new associations and mo- tions of these permanent particles. Compound bodies being apt to break, not in the midst of solid particles, but when these particles are laid together and touch in a few parts : these particles have not only a vis inertia? accompanied with such laws of motion as naturally result from that force, but also are moved by certain active principles, as gravity, and that which causes the fermen- tation and the cohesion of bodies. The principles are not to be considered as occult qualities, supposed the result from the speci- fic form of things, but as grand laws of nature, by which the things themselves are formed, their truth appearing to us by phenomena, though the cause is not yet discovered, the 45 would inevitably be that all the matter of which the universe is composed, would either be all passivity or all activity; all inertness or all power; it is far otherwise — in the system of na- ture we behold matter of different kinds which sub- sits, possessing different capacities and different powers.* Some species that are totally active and energetic, others that are totally passive and inert ; some that move, others that are moved ; some that combine, others that cannot resist combina- tion. We behold, for example, the matter of light, of fire, and of air, in a state of constant activity, whilst on the contrary the liquid, and more especially the solid part of which the world is composed is imbecile and inert. It is by vir- tue of the difference which exists in the nature of matter, that the variety of changes, which are * By capacity I mean something which is passive only, and by power something which is active and efficient. Capacity may be said to bear the same relation to power, as the obedience of a ser- vant to the will of his master, as children to their parents, as loyal subjects to the laws of the government under which they live, and as the universe in general to the Deity omnipotent, by whose infinite power it is governed and controuled. constantly 46 constantly taking place throughout the system of the world, are evidently to be referred. In the investigation of action therefore in general, whe- ther original or derived, it is absolutely necessary to ascertain the nature of the means rather than of the end, of the cause, more than of the effect; when the resistance is equal or greater than the body acting, the resisting body continues pas- sive and at rest; when the power is greater than the resistance the body moves ; the degree of motion produced is the proof or test, which sub- sists of the power in the one of overcoming the resistance of the other ; so far however from ac- tion requiring resistance, as is generally supposed, it is resistance alone that diminishes and ultimate- ly destroys action. Hence it is that bodies move slower in a liquid than in a gaseous medium; fas- faster through a liquid than through a solid one. # • Professor Gravesand ridicules the idea that action is possible to exist without resistance, for who, says lie, can conceive the pos- bility of action without an obstacle; soon after however he al- lows resistance to be an impediment to action. From these palpable contradictions the following corollary is deduced, that the force and the resistance are equal to one another. Notwithstand- 47 Notwithstanding' this most obvious truth, it is neverthless contended by Sir Isaac Newton that motion produced in different bodies, is oc- casioned by a mutuality of power, subsisting between them. The assertion is evidently true so far as it relates to motion created by impulse, and the fact accords with the assertion, not only that the degree of motion but the mutation is always proportionate to the force impressed, and is al- ways made according to that right line in which that force is impressed. This declaration of a fact, is by Sir Isaac Newton converted into a law, and constitutes the second law of his Prin- cipia. " Mutationem motus proportionalem esse vi motrici impressae et fieri secundum lineam rectam qua vis ilia imprimitur." With respect to bodies which possess power essentially,or within themselves,it is far otherwise. It is by virtue of this inherent power, which ani- mated beings in general possess, that they are enabled to overcome resistance and produce ac- tion, to act without being acted upon, to move without being moved ; by which a horse is enabled to 48 to draw a cart without the cart drawing the horse, that the pen with which I write is enabled to describe the letters I am writing, without the paper having any power of resisting the impulse which it receives from my pen ; the degree of ac- tion which is produced does not so much arise from magnitude as from internal energy, from ex- tent of ponderable matter, as from activity and skill. It is by means such as these that the strong in mind, but weak in body, are often en- abled to overcome the strong in body but the weak in mind. It is in the skill which experi- ence is often capable of producing, that the ex- perienced swordsman is enabled to overcome the awkward rustic ; by which the little David was able to slay the great Goliah. It is this power which, in fact, constitutes really and truly, not only vis motus, but vis inertiae also; a power to move as well as a power to be quiet; a power to act and to resist, as well as a power to yield and to follow impressions communicated and received. A vis 49 A vis inertiae such as this is altogether sepa- rate and different from the vis inertiae ascribed by Sir Isaac Newton to matter in general, both dead and common; the attribute to which he refers is mere capacity, not power ; it is inertia sine vi, resistance without activity, a forceless force. So far therefore from supposing that in the motions which different bodies display, there subsists between them a mutuality of action, as Sir Isaac Newton asserts; that a stone draws a horse as much as a horse draws a cart, that a stone presses the finger as much as the finger presses the stone, Quicquid premit vel trahit alteram, tantundem ab eo premitur vel trahitur. si quis lapidem digito premit, premitur et hujus digitus a lapide. si equus lapidem funi alligatum trahit, retrahetur etiam et equus (ut ita dicam) aequaliter in lapidem, &c. &c. I contend, on the contrary r that an assertion such as this is erroneous in the extreme ; that it is thereby ascribing equal powers to unequal causes; confounding together inanimate with e animated 50 animated beings, as well as different kinds of matter, whose nature and properties are altoge- ther different ; death and life, passion and action ; things that are moved with those that have the power of moving ; things which derive power through the medium of participation by exter- nal force, with those which possess it essential- ly and in actuality ; and finally reaction itself with resistance. What analogy, I would ask, is there between the actions which flow from the powers (which I have before briefly noticed), which animated beings possess, and the passivity of the com- mon matter on which they act; between the re- action of a spring and the ponderable matter it is able to support; between the expansibi- lity of air and of fire, and the resisting body which they are able to project to a considerable distance. It is apparent to me that in propounding this pretended law Sir Isaac Newton never had in his contemplation the power which par- ticular bodies essentially possess to produce action. 51 action. The very term re-action, which he em- ploys, and the arrangement in which the asser- tion is conveyed, shew most clearly that it is to the power of reacting' only, and of return- ing from their forced to their natural state, that elastic bodies possess, to which he refers. Had it been otherwise he would have inverted the order and the arrangement in his terms ; instead of saying that re-action was equal to action, he would have said that action was equal to re-ac- tion ; in either case however he would have been incorrect. In order that re-action should be equal to. action it is absolutely necessary to pre-suppose not only that the medium through which bodies act upon one another opposes no resistance what- ever to them, but that space should exist without matter to fill it, and a vacuum be the natural con- dition of the greatest part of space. The illustrious author of this conjecture, it appears to me, not only made it without proof, but contrary to every principle in nature. If such e 2 an 52 an incongruity as a vacuum for a moment could be supposed, the bond of continuity by which different parts of the material world are held and connected together, would be broken and de- stroyed : instead of the world in particular, or the universe in general, being intrinsically one whole, it would consist of as many distinct worlds, or universes, as there are separated parts or vacua, and every vacuum would, in fact, of itself be one distinct world, or one distinct uni- verse ; it is far more reasonable to conclude, that it is as essential for space to have matter to fill it, as for matter to have space in which it can be contained. A condition of things such as that which has been hypothetically supposed, I maintain is falsified by every fact of which we are in possession; it is owing to the plenitude of matter which constitutes the cause why a fi- nite power can never produce an infinite effect, and why motion excited, perpetually diminishes, and is ultimately lost; it is the case with the motion of a pendulum ; if a pendulum be set in motion by an impelling force, the medium of air through which it is made to move perpetually opposes 5S opposes motion, without giving it: if re-action was equal to action, the pendulum would press the air as much as the air presses the pendulum, and motion perpetual might be produced. Motion perpetual might be produced if we suppose that which is impossible, that resistance should be taken away, not only from the friction at the point of suspension, but in the medium through which the arch is described; if the re-acting power of an elastic body is 20. the resistance of the medium 5, thebody acted upon can only be 15. The action produced in consequence of re-action, can therefore neither be equal or greater, it must therefore be less; if it were otherwise, instead of the motion in a ball excited to move being forced ultimately to cease, it would move for ever, and an infinite variety of effects produced which these false assumptions pre-suppose. It is in the truth or error which exists in the assumptions, or principles from whence different sciences are derived, on which altogether de- pend the truth or error of the conclusion which b 3 is 54 is made. Instead of these laws being rules of action, which all matter must obey, effects are constantly produced throughout the sys- tem of nature in violation of them. I shall therefore proceed to examine the various phe- nomena which different species of matter dis- play, and at the same time shew how much those phenomena are at variance with the rules which those laws are intended to describe. CHAPTER III. ON SENSATION AND THE OBJECTS OF IT. IF I proceed to examine the relation which exists between the impressions which are made by external objects on the organs of sense, with which animated beings are endowed, and the functions which are in consequence excited, we shall find that although it is very true, that in order for sensations to be produced the agency of external means on the sentient principle is absolutely necessary; it is nevertheless most certain that the sensation itself does not abide in the external substance by which the impres- sion 56 sion is made, but in the living and animated be- ing alone. That this is the fact will appear if the effects are examined, which are produced by the same impressions on beings of different classes, as well as on the same individual at different times. It is very probable that impressions of the same kind and of the same strength induced on ani- mals of the same class, and of the same age ex- cite in them sensations of the same kinds ; it is however certain that very different sensations are excited by the same impression on animals of different species : that impressions which excite the sensation of pleasure in some will be found to give pain to others ; and the same objects are known continually to vary in the sen- sations which they produce : the hands and fin- gers of the same individual under different cir- cumstances, if plunged into water of the same temperature shall at one time excite the sensa- tion of heat at another time of cold, — the undula- tion of the air, which at one time will be scarcely audible to the ear. will at another ap- pear 37 pear like the voice of thunder, and give the sensation of pain, (as in phrenitis). In a state of health the same degree of illumi- nation which excites the sensation of pleasure in the eye, in opthalmia will occasion the colour resembling a flame of fire. A cup of cold water which generally quenches thirst and gratifies the palate in a state of health, if merely presented to a miserable being la- bouring under hydrophobia, will excite the most dreadful convulsions that can be conceived, as well as the most unutterable thirst ; with foaming at the mouth, and will accelerate death by the most agonizing means. If the sensations which beings possess were inherent in the external substances, instead of those sensations being multiplied and continued without end, they would be limited and confin- ed to the particular instant when the impression was conveyed; and unless it was continually repeated the sensation could never be recalled. Facts 58 Facts such as those which 1 have stated, and of which there are no end, decidedly prove that sensation does not abide in the external sub- stance, but in the living and animated being alone; they go to prove that the sensation of sweetness does not abide in sugar, flavour in a rose, cold in snow, or heat in fire, more than pleasure or pain in a whip or in a sword : these different bodies constitute the agents only by which impressions on the nerves of sense are made. Although in common conversation we are in the habit of connecting impression and sensation together, as if subsisting in one and the same subject, nothing however can be more incorrect, instead of confounding the impression with the sensation, the one ought to be separated from the other. The question to be determined is not whether the sensations inhere in these bodies, or more especially the affirmation that they do actually inhere in them, that heat is in fire, cold in snow, whiteness 59 "whiteness in silver, blackness in jet, sweetness in sugar, acidity in vinegar: we might with as much propriety seek for the living amongst the dead, and ascribe to death the efficient cause of life. r Immobility of motion^ ignorance of design, .'fatuity of thought, necessity of free agency. The proposition to be solved to me appears to be, not whether these sensations abide in these bodies, but w hat are the bodies which possess the poiver of conveying impressions upon the organs of sense in general, by means of which sensation is produced ? What are the bodies which im- pressed upon the eye shall cause the sensation of illumination in general, and of colour in par- ticular; upon the ear the sensation of sound in general, and of tone in particular; upon the tongue taste in general and flavour in particular; upon the skin feeling in general, the feeling of pleasure or pain; of heat or of cold in particular. A proposition such as this, with as much cer- tainty may be solved by a child five years of age as by a man who has lived to the years of Mathu- 60 Mathusalem; a child will at once affirm that strokes or impressions made on him by a rod give him pain, that a rose is fragrant, that gold is yellow, silver white, jet black, sugar sweet, vinegar sour, fire hot, snow cold. Not that these sensations actually inhere in these bodes, but that these bodies when impressed upon the different senses produce or excite upon them different sensations, to which different and appropriate names have been given ; of illumination and variegation, of flavour and of odour, of hot and of cold. Whilst each individual organ can only obtain a partial knowledge of any subject; the eye of colour, the touch of resistance, the nose of fla- vour, and the tongue of taste; the mind on the contrary, which subsisting not like the organs in parts, but as a whole total and universal, receives the impressions wholly and totally, and contemplates altogether and at once the vari- ous attributes of the body, a perception of which the organs of sense had separately obtained, whilst the organs of sense therefore distinguish the particular attributes of a body, the mind, on the 61 the contrary receives and conceives these per- ceptions universally; things partible it views impartibly, things divisible indivisibly, things temporal eternally.* Hoping that I have succeeded in showing that sensation does not abide in the external sub- stance, but in the sensitive principle alone, it will be easy to understand that that which is void of thought and of reason cannot be the cause of thought and of reason, that although. sensa- tion more than ratiocination cannot exist with- out an instrument or organ ; the organ is not the cause either of sensation or ratiocination ; al- though right thinking and feeling may not take place without a right disposition of body, a right disposition of body is not as a conse- • Whilst the different attributes which the organ of sense perceive constitute the true sources, from whence definition ought to be derived; nomenclature, on the contrary is made from the congregation into one point of all the attributes to- gether. The definition of silver or of gold is not confined to its colour only, but to its colour and density; its diagnosis from other bodies consist in its malleability and relative weight &c. quence 62 quence the efficient cause of right thinking: the body, it has been well observed by a celebrated divine, may hinder thought but cannot effect it ; the faculties of the soul like the sun may be ob- scured and eclipsed by an interposing body, but as soon as the obstruction is removed the light will shine out again in full lustre. It has been owing to the wretched system of philosophy which makes the external substance by which the impression is made to be very thing, and the sentient principle by which the impres- sion is received to be nothing, on which the whole system of materialism is founded ; that makes an effect instead of a cause of life; of that principle which is the cause of organization and of motion throughout the whole range of animated existence, from the most simple vege- table to the most complicated animal, as well as that higher and more excellent principle by which man is more particularly characterized, I mean of mind or soul. I shall 63 I shall put the authority of scripture on this point out of the question, because I know it is no authority with those who deny its immaterial nature; it is however certain that the philoso- phers of ancient times entertained very different ideas upon the subject from those of modern days. According to Mr. Locke the soul is a mere tabula rasa, a sheet of white paper, an emp- ty recipient, a mechanical blank; according to Plato the soul is the reservoir of ideas and of forms, an ever written tablet, a vital and intel- lectual energy ; according to Mr. Locke's system ideas are formed from external and sensible particulars by mechanical means; by Plato ideas are eternal and immaterial beings, the pat- terns and originals of all sensible forms, the fountain of all evidence and of truth: by the generality of modern philosophers the soul is supposed to be the effect of organs which in their nature are material and perishable ; that the soul in fact is what Brown in his absurd and wicked system, conceived life actually to be a « mere 64 mere effect, of which organization was the cause, by the Gtksr that the soul is incorporeal and im- material, eternal and divine. Whosoever compares both systems together will have cause to deplore the loss which philo- sophy has sustained in consequence of the inno- vation on this subject which has taken place, and be forced to see the attributes of mind render- ed subservient and dependent on the properties of matter. It is in vain for the modern sages to argue in favour of the immortality of the soul, from the eternity and indestructability of matter, it ought by them to be proved what the perishable na- ture of all generated beings, from the creation of the world to the present time, absolutely deny; they ought to shew that the organization as a cause, of which soul is supposed to be the ef- fect, instead of flowing and changing, and constantly verging to inevitable decay, is per- menant during life and everlastingly the same and 65 and that the attributes of the soul could survive the cause by which it was itself produced. Yielding however to the testimony of our senses, beholding as we do, not only during life, but more especially at the period of dissolution and of death, the destruction total and complete which the organization undergoes, the con- clusion is direct, that the instant the organiza- tion of the body is decomposed or destroyed, like the power of any inanimate machine, the anni- hilation of the soul must everlastingly take place ; the annihilation of the soul must then take place, because the power of a subject can never survive the arrangements out of which those powers were produced : the materialist, therefore, if he be true to his principles, can never extend his hopes of existence beyond the grave. Instead of looking forward after the death of the body to a resurrection of life eternal, he can only ex- pect an eternal annihilation; instead of exclaim- ing in the language of St. Paul, " Oh Death! where is thy sting? oh Grave! where is thy vic- tory?" the materialist must feel the bitterness in f the 66 the sting of death, and admit the victory of the grave, without the consoling hope of a resurec- tion out of it. It was to this impious class of pretenders to philosophy which in times of old composed the sect of the sadducees, the very same sect which under different appellations, exists in different parts of Europe ; they are the Illuminati of Ger- many; the Scavans and the philosophers of France ; the materialists of England. They constitute, in their own estimation, the wise men of the west, the standards of human opinion, in whom the perfectibility of human wisdom abides, to whose judgement all ought to appeal and bow. Instead of assimilating their false philosophy to the divine truths of revelation, they rather wish to make revelation bend to their false philosophy, or else altoge- ther discard as extravagant and absurd, the sublime truths which are proclaimed in the oracles of God. {shall 67 I shall not at present expatiate on the im- mediate influence which a scheme such as this, of arrogance and of misery, must have upon the mind or soul of its votaries. I ought however to beg pardon for the expression, — on such a system, soul, or mind, cannot be supposed to have any actual subsistence; it can only be compared to the index which points the time on the dial of a clock, which for ever stops the instant the spring becomes broken, or the weight arrested, by the force of which the in- dex was moved. It is very apparent also, that whilst the scheme of materialism terminates with mortality, that it becomes the immediate parent of which the athe- istical system is the legitimate offspring. By ascrib- ing to the operation of matter the whole pheno- mena of nature, it also gets rid of the necessity which exists to every reflecting and well regulat- ed mind of any principle which is intelligent and divine: for nothing can be divine which is not intelligent, and nothing can be intelligent which has not a meaning, nor any being have a mean- f 2 ing / 68 ing which has not a motive or a final cause (as it has formerly been called) to direct its opera- tions; men such as these may appear wise amongst fools, but they will appear to be fools amongst the wise. It in fact discards and rejects the absolute necessity which has been apparent (with few exceptions), to all men, in all ages, of one uni- versal and supreme cause, primary and effici- ent of all secondary or instrumental causes, of one all creative and preserving spirit, the foun- tain of all wisdom, the source of all life and action, who made the world by his command and who governs it by his providence ; who is infinitely powerful, wise, and good, whose centre is every where, whose circumference is no where; by whose omnipresence all things are permiated, by whose omniscience all things are known ; not only the visible actions performed by the body, but inward thoughts and affections of the soul ; who is above all, through all, and in all, as St. Paul describes it. Dr. 69 Dr. Adam Clark, whose profound learning is universally acknowledged ; in his excellent commentary on the bible, which he is now pub- lishing ; in his first note says, " many attempts have been made to define the word God ; as to the word itself, it is pure Anglo Saxon, and amongst our ancestors signified not only the divine being, more commonly designated by the word, but also good; as in their apprehension it appears that god and good were correlatives ; and when they thought or spoke of him they were ever led from the word itself to consider him as the good being, a fountain of infinite be- nevolence and beneficence, towards his crea- tures." A general definition of this great first cause, as far as human words dare attempt one, may be thus given. The eternal, independent, and self-existent Being: the Being whose purposes and actions spring from himself, without foreign motive or influence ; he who is absolute in dominion, the most pure, most simple, and most spiritual of all essences, infinitely benevolent, beneficent, f 3 true 70 true and holy; the cause of all being, the up- holder of all things, infinitely happy because in- finitely good, and eternally self-sufficient, need- ing nothing that he has made. Illimitable in his immensity, inconceivable in his mode of ex- istence, and indescribable in his essence, known only fully to himself, because an infinite mind can only be comprehended by itself. In a word, a being, who from his infinite wisdom cannot err or be deceived, and who from his infinite good- ness can do nothing but what is eternally just, right and kind.* * If the act of parliament which obliges a printer to put his name at the end of every book which he prints, had enacted also that every author who publishes a book should be obliged to insert at the beginning of it the most approved definition of the great first cause, the Almighty God ; it would perhaps be one of the best correctives that can be devised against that mass of pollution, and of filth, of profanation and defamation which we constantly behold issuing from the«press ; the best book would not be rriade the worse for it, and the worse book wouM unquestionably be all the better. CHAP. CHAPTER IV. ON THE POWER OF LIFE AND ITS RELATION TO MATTER. THE subject has imperceptibly led me be- yond the limits I had prescribed; the error, if er- ror it can be called, would not have existed had men of science, instead of investigating effects only, pursued their enquiries to the nature of the causes by which they were produced. It ap- pears to me] that nothing but a perverted way of thinking could have led to the belief that matter, in whatever form it exists, has the power to convert itself into different organs, in fabric most delicate, in action most extensive, in form most diversified ; that by the congregation of these f 4 organ g 72 organs one whole system is constituted ; that the result of this organization is life, and out of this organized life action and motion are produced, so that matter is the efficient cause, and life only the effect. It is evident indeed that these gentlemen move in an inverted order, and end where they ought to begin ; they begin by making power to arise out of weakness, symmetry and order from that which is naturally formless, and finally design and intelligence the attributes of things void of all consciousness and destitute of all sensation. Instead of making organization the effect of life, they make life to be the effect of organiza- tion; instead of making the phenomena of or- ganization the final, they make it the primary and efficient cause, in which life is supposed truly and virtually to consist — the source of life, indeed, at its termination. Had they however investigated the subject as metaphysicians and physiologists ought to have 73 have done, not as chemists and materialists, had they not begun the enquiry at the wrong end, and stopped in the middle, they would have seen that although action was the effect of life, that life subsisted prior to action, that the first actions of life were displayed in developing it- self, by acting on the matter by which it was sur- rounded, and that the result of this power which the organs possessed was manifested by the production of organic action ; the power there- fore was resident within, the means by which this power was evolved or called forth into energy came from without, the result of which was the production of organization and action. The action produced is not the cause of life, as has been falsely and erroneously supposed, but merely the effect of it; life may exist without organic action, but organic action cannot exist without life : life may be considered to consti- tute the principle and the cause, of which or- ganization is the secondary and instrumental cause, and organic action itself is the final cause. The various organized systems therefore which we behold, are effects only of eft t d 74 and producing causes, they constitute the ob- vious and manifest images of which these pri- mary principles and causes are the prototypes. It is very true that these prototypes or principles can only be known through the medium of their effects; by the phenomena of life, of vitality,- through sensation — of sensibility^ through consci- ousness — of intellect^ through the works of crea- tion, — that we can conceive a knowledge of the Creator, or as St. Paul describes it "by which the invisible things of God from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made ; even his eternal power and Godhead." The relation of power which those principles or causes bear to the subject or matter on which they operate, is illustrated by every phenome- non which is produced by animated beings in general: it is, for example, by the power of the artist over the subject of his art, that he is en- abled to convert and to model it according to his will; that the statuary has the power to chissel the marble, into a statue; the painter to 76 to draw figures upon the canvas ; the carpenter to cut the timber and shape it in the form of a table, &c. &c. It is the same relation by which the di- gestive, or assimilating organs which all ani- mated beings possess, have over the dif- ferent articles of food which they several- ly receive for their nourishment and sup- port Instead of preserving the identity of its nature, or the qualities which it originally possessed, instead of obeying the order of che- mical affinities, or becoming amenable to the operation of chemical laws, instead of the parts uniting and forming compounds, which under the same circumstances uniformly and invari- ably produce the same result: the change which the food is made to undergo by the digestive organs, is not only not the same as we behold produced from chemical action, but totally and absolutely different ; the commutation which it has sustained is total and complete, not only with respect to quantity but to quality also, not only with respect to external configuration in gene* ral, but to internal property in particular. It 76 It is this unifying power, if I may be allow^k the expression, which the assimilating organs possess over different articles of food, which are discordant and heterogeneous, of reducing differ- ent kinds of food to one and the same species, by which the act of digestion differs in a very essential manner from the act of aggregation simply, and more especially from chemical union and combination. When two masses or portions of matter of the same kind are added toge- ther, an increase of bulk only takes place ; and when different kinds of matter are brought in contact together, and an union between them is accomplished, the compound which has been formed always bears the same relation to the quality of the parts out of which it was pro- duced, whether the union has been effected be- tween gas and vapour, a fluid or a solid, an acid or an alkali, a metallic ore or any other body. With the act of digestion it is far otherwise ; by the energy of the digestive organs gasses are less 77 4&9S- bereaved of their expansibility, acids of their acidity, alkalies of their acrimony, all of the order of their affinities, and rendered bland and mild; by them solids are liquified, liquids gela- tenized and made solid, things simple become compounded, such as are inanimate are animat- ed, animated things are killed and revivified, the most sapid bodies are rendered insipid, the most putrid matter is deprived of its putridity, and made antiseptic and fresh, the most fresh and antiseptic is rendered susceptible of undergo- ing the processes of putrefaction and fermenta- tion. Words indeed are wanting, language itself is insufficient to describe the difference which exists between the laws by which animated beings are governed and those to which matter, either dead or common, is amenable. Whilst the phe- nomena which common matter displays are re- gular and definite, and uniformly and invariably the same ; we behold, on the contrary, the same kind of matter applied to different living sys- tems, as well as to the same systems at differ- ent times changed into a, nature totally differ- ent: 78 ent: we behold in the same field, and in the same soil, a multitude of different vegetables fed and nourished by water and by air in qua- lity precisely the same, and yet assuming an organization and form totally different. It is well observed by Mr. Mason Good (whose learn- ing and research 1 am happy to acknowledge), that the most burning sands of hot climates, even the karo fields of the Cape of Good Hope, so sere and adust that no water can be extracted from them, are the media in which the most suc- culent vegetables of which we have any know- ledge flourish and evolve; so deleterious indeed is a wet season to their growth, that they are destroyed by it ; there are also various tribes of vegetables that are destitute of radicles, and which can only be supported and nourished by the air and by the moisture which the atmos- phere contains ; a large portion of the class of fuci has no root whatever, and it is stated that the aerial epidendron, the epidendrum flos aeris, denominated aerial from its extraordinary pro- perties, and which is a native of Java in the east Indies, on account of the elegance of its leaves, the the beauty of its flower, and the exquisite odour which it diffuses, is plucked up by the inhabi- tants and suspended by a silken cord from the ceiling of their apartments, from whence it con- tinues from year to year to put forth new leaves to display new blossoms, and exhale new fra- grance, although fed out of the simple bodies I have before stated.* This assimilating and convertible power over different kinds of food in the digestive organs is equally proved by animals, whether herbiver- ous, carnivorous, or omnivorous. Meat cut out of the same joint, bread from the same loaf, water drawn from the same fountain, and portions of air separated from the same volume, given to a man or a monkey, to a dog or a cat, will lose every vestige of its former qualities, and be con- verted to the particular nature of the system to which it had been applied. This power of decomposing the most minute * Vide Mr. Good's Oration before the London Physical So- ciety. particles 80 particles of matter, which the assimilating organs possess, and of converting it to the nature of the system to which it has been applied, although obvious to the most simple observation of the most common observer, and which must be obvious to himself as well as to every one else, has been further ascertained by experiments. Mr. Abernethy procured a rabbit six weeks old and fed him with a quantity of young cabbage and lettuce which had grown on flannel, sprink- led with distill ed-water ; the animal it was found preserved his health as perfectly as if he had been placed in a warren. Dr. Fordyce enclosed in glasses filled with common water several gold and silver fish ; at first he changed the water every twenty four hours, and afterwards every three days ; on this food alone the fish continued to live and to grow for fifteen months. As Dr. Fordyce sus- spected that it was possible animalcules might have previously existed in this water, he ex- changed the well for distilled water, and after adding air to it, and in order to prevent the pos- sibility 81 sibility of insects getting access within the ves- sel he carefully closed it up : the fish however grew and performed all their natural functions as perfectly as if they had been swimming in a reservoir. The fact is equally proved by those animals who live principally upon carrion, upon rotten cheese, and the exuviae both of animals and of vegetables also; although corruption is not the cause of animation, animation often flourishes with the greatest vigour on the materials which corruption has produced. We shall find it to be generally the case if we were to take a cursory review of the differ- ent kinds of food which different classes of men take for their nourishment; however different the materials may be on which they feed, the blood and the flesh of which they are composed possesses the same properties and yields by chemical analysis the same product; whether of a Bramin who lives on vegetables alone, or of a tartar who is carnivorous ; and I would ap- g peal 82 peal to the testimony of any determined venison eater, whether he has not frequently enjoyed the green fat of a stinking haunch, without re- taining in his own person any of its offensive flavour. This converting power of the assimilating organ, on stinking matter, was proved by Mr. Hunter, and Spalanzani; they thrust pieces of the most putrid flesh, tied by a string, into the stomach of different dogs, and after leaving it for some time, by means of the string they witfc- drew the meat from the stomach, and on exa- mining it they found that instead of being pur trid and offensive as at first, that it had become fresh and sweet. That all the effects which I have above enu- merated are accomplished by the activity and power of the gastric juice, which is secreted from the surface of the stomach, is admitted by phy- siologists in general ; a great diversity of opi- nion however exists in respect to the mode of its operation ; by a few, very few indeed, it is, con- 83 concluded that it is performed by a living* power resident in this fluid, — by the generality of others that it is the consequence of a chemical not a living power. If it be by a chemical power, we ought by analogy to expect that its chemical properties by analysis would be detected; that it ought to possess some sensible properties, that it is either acid or alkalescent ; so far however from possessing sensible or chemical properties adequate to account for the extraordinary power which it possesses, it appears upon a close examination to be a mere mucous fluid, inodourous and insipid, neither acid nor alcales- cent, neither turning vegetable blues to a green or to a red colour; and by chemical analysis it f yields neither saline or mineral substances; it is therefore, I contend impossible to refer its action to any chemical power which it is pre- tended to possess, but that it is far more rea- sonable to conclude that its activity is altoge- ther derived from the energy of the living power which is superadded to it, whose edge is shar- per than that of the keenest knife, whose solvent g 2 pro- 84 property is more active than that of the most eroding caustic. Such indeed is the activity of this living juice that although it remains during life in harmony with the organ by which it has been produced, its own powernotwithstanding extends and continues after the death of the organ itself has taken place ; hence it is that the stomach has thefr been found corroded and destroyed, more especially in the py- loric extremity of it, and after making its way on surrounding parts, these have been found torn asunder and finally dissolved, This solvent power was abundantly proved by Reamur, by Dr. Stevens, and others ; they intro- duced different kinds of food in balls,some of which were perforated, and others which were impervi- ous : the food placed in the former, on which the gastric juice could have access Wjas very easily di- gested, whilst the food contained in the latter re- mained unaltered* • I cannot at this place go further into the subject, but must refer the reader to my system of physiology in which all the facts are properly detailed, Xv 85 It is by the energy of this same living power resi- dent in the seed of plants and in the fsecundated ova of animals, that the acom becomes evolved into an, oak,the infant foliage expanded into leaves,and the whole process of nutrition and of growth carried, on : it is this power which constitutes the architect and the fabricator, by which the whole machine is erected ; it is the base on which the whole stands, it forms the bond of its elementary parts, the cement that unites them into one whole : it is the cause primary and efficient, from whence the individuality of every living systemarises in which the form and the sex it assumes essen- tially reside ; by which the human species dif- fers from the brute, the brute from the veget- able, the vegetable itself from matter inanimate and common ; this power it is which I call life. The matter which this power has assimilated and organized it is which I call living matter; it is this principle which has been named by Aris- totle sdos, by Harris, form — by Stahl vis medi- catrix naturae — by Haller, vis vitae — by Blumen- bach, nisus formativus— by J. Brown, excitabi- lity (if the term has in it any meaning), and by Hun- ter, principle of life; which term appears to me g 3 so 86 so appropriate and distinct that I shall conse- quently continue to retain, and which may be defined " the poiver by whose energy different species of matter are assimilated to one kind, a living system organized and formed, and the various parts ofivhich it is composed are pro- tected and preserved from decomposition and decay." In its essence this living principle must be de- finite, because the body which it has organized and formed is limited in the extent of its growth, and prevented from acquiring indefinite magni- tude, although the materials for its perpetual en crease continue to be applied. It must possess a formative power, because every living system which exists, from the most simple and insignificant, to the most gigantic and complicated, is always marked by an arrange- ment of its parts, definite and particular. In its energy it must be essentially active, since it imparts activity to the inertness, and figure 87 figure to the formless condition of the materials of which it is composed ; in that energy it must be temporal, because every living system from the beginning of its creation to its termina- tion is transient and perishable, and in a con- stant and unceasing state of progression, per- fection and decay. c 4 CHAPTER V. ON THE EVOLUTION AND FINAL CAUSE OF LIFE, THE principle of life, as a cause, may be con- templated in the abstract, as separate and dis- tinct from the action which it produces ; it bears the same relation to action as the painter does to the painting; although it is very true that the painting could not have existed without the painter, the effect without the cause, more than vital action without vitality; the painter never- theless existed before the picture which he de- scribed upon the canvass, as well as vitality it- self before vital action; that is to say, that al- though organic action cannot exist without life, life 90 life may exist withdut organic action ; the existence of vitality without organic action is proved by the seeds of plants, by the ova of animals, by the foetus in utero, as well as by torpid animals in a torpid state: it is proved by the multitude of cases which we constantly behold, in the foetal state, in which many of the organs which are absolutely necessary to carry on the func- tions of the adult system are altogether wanting. I have seen a fetus without a head, others with a head but without brains, some without lungs, others without a heart or lungs ; many have been found destitute of abdominal viscera, and with various other mal conformations of the sys- tem. Although these organs were either defective or wanting, the other parts of the system were found perfectly developed, and to have attained their symmetry and form. This assertion will more evidently appear if I were to examine the state of the living prin- ciple in the seeds of plants and ova of animals; there 91 there are not in them any traces whatever to be found of the future animal or vegetable, there is no foetus in miniature, either of the one or of the other ; and in animals, more especially of those belonging to the higher classes, gestation has continued for a considerable period before any bond of continuity between the different parts can possibly be detected ; neither is the evolu- tion equal in its progress throughout the whole; there are many parts whose evolution has scarce- ly commenced, whilst the developement of others has been completed. If foetal evolution depended on organic action in general, a necessity would exist for the pre- sence of the various substances on which the different organs are destined to act; the admis- sion of air would be necessary to call forth the action of the lungs; the introduction of food into the mouth would be necessary to call forth the digestive powers of the stomach. If the foetus were so situated its subsistence would in a great measure depend upon choice, ' not 92 not necessity; upon choice without the power of choosing, upon organic action before organiza- tion had existed, of indigency and want whilst destitute of the means by which its necessities could be supplied, and the fetal system would re- semble the adult, without the power of arriving to that state ; it is far otherwise ; it appears to me that the fetal constitutes a medium condition, forming on the one hand a connected part of the maternal consitution, although separated from it by its own individual existence : that there sub- sists an individual existence in both, separate and distinct from each, is evident from many facts which we see, in which the life of the fetus terminates whilst that of the mother continues, and on the contrary in which the fetus survives the death of the mother. The true end which nature has in view during the fetal state is evi- dently to organize those parts which constitute the means by which the animal is able to pro- vide for its necessary wants when the adult state begins : hence it is that the organs which are designed to accomplish these ends are especially distinguished in the fetal state, by the rapidity 93 rapidity of their growth and the magnitude which they have attained when the adult state has be- gun. I may enumerate, as the first in order the head with the organs of sense and the nerves which are connected with them; secondly, the mouth, trachea, and lungs ; thirdly, the heart and arterial system, the oesophagus and sto- mach, with its auxiliary organs, namely, the spleen, the pancreatic, and hepatic systems ; the omentum, the intestinal canal, and lacteal vessels, &c. &c. Under the second head might be men- tioned the bones and many of the voluntary muscles attached to them, the generating organs and the venous and lymphatic absorbent systems, the teeth, the hair, the nails, &c. During the foetal state the brain is in a state of growth with- out consciousriess,"c?sense without sensation, the muscles without voluntary motion, the lungs without respiration, the stomach without digest tion, the intestinal canal without peristaltic motion, and the lacteal vessels without ab-r sorption. Although 94 Although these different organs are in a pas- sive state, no doubt can exist but that they pos- sess a power to act and that they only require proper objects adapted to the nature of each, in order that that power may be excited and dis- played in the production of action. It is this power of acting, of the eye to see, of the ear to bear, of the tongue to taste, of the stomach to digest, which I denominate predisposition. Predisposition therefore appears to be a state of dormant power, or a power in capacity; it resembles the elasticity of a spring, whilst it is coiled up ; like the figures engraved in a seal, be- fore they are participated by the wax; it is like the gun powder before it detonates and ex- plodes ; the gun powder p6ssesses the capacity to explode, the seal to impress the figure, and the spring to react. These attributes, however, which these different bodies severally possess, would never be displayed unless they were placed un- der circumstances fitted for the nature of each ; a resisting medium for the spring, a soft body like 95 like wax for the seal, and a particular state of the air for the gun powder : it is the same thing with respect to the living principle and the different organs which it has produced, it not only demands a certain state and temperature of the medium in which it is placed, but parti- cular kinds of food as well as particular condi- tion of it, before that dormant power can become power active, and the phenomena produced of organic action. It is in the developement of this power from capacity to energy, from predisposi- tion to action, by which means are employed with a view to ends, and the final cause attain- ed for which animated beings were intended.* If I were to prosecute this enquiry it would be necessary for me not only to detail the structure * Causes may be divided into three kinds, first, primary or efficient causes, as the great first cause and the principles of intel- lect and of life. Secondly, into instrumental or secondary causes, which consist in the various organs of the body, as the instruments which it employs in order to assist, as a telescope to the eye, a hammer to the hand, &c. &c. Thirdly, The final cause which consists in the accomplishment of the object for which the instrumental cause was employed ; the final cause may therefore be said to arise from the motive by which the action js produced, of 9*5 of those organs in different classes of beings both animal and vegetable, but the mode in which they severally subsist. It is with a view to make the end subservient to the means, of adapting the medium to the nature of the being which it is to contain, to pro- duce in fact harmony and adaptation between both ; that we bekold the providence of God has destined particular soils and particular climates for particular classes of beings in which those ends may be attained. When we behold the regularity with which the actions of vegetables are performed, as well as the simplicity in the construction of their frame, we are naturally led to conclude that those ac- tions, constant and definite as they seem to be, must flow from the operation of causes which exist uniformly and invariably the same, with>- out any opposing or controuling power, resid- ing within the system itself, by the energy of which those actions can either be suppressed or prevented ; there is not only a progressive development 97 developement of particular organs, from the first period of germination to the perfection of fructification ; but an appointed season for the evolution of the living principle itself, which the seed contains ; the end or final cause of which seems evidently to be the propagation of the species, as means of affording nourishment and support to beings of a higher class. The means by which the end is obtain- ed is not confined to one, but often extends to several modes, and the offspring produced is perfect in all its parts, whether it has been evolv- ed from a bulb or from a bud, from a single leaf or from the seed itself. It does not however appear, from any know- ledge which we possess, that vegetables have any organs either of sense or of consciousness, with which animals in general are endowed. When we behold the blossom of the sun flower following the beams of the sun from east to west the dionaea muscipula seizing flies by the con- H trac 98 traction of its leaves and making them prisoners ; the sensitive plant becoming tremulous and irrita- ble throughout the whole of its frame when impressions are made on any of its parts ; when various other plants have their corolla opened and expanded, contracted and closed at parti- cular periods of the day and night, as well as under particular states of temperature in the at- mosphere : I may, perhaps, be permitted to as- sert that these effects are not the offspring of the living principle alone, but on the contrary that they must proceed from some small degree of sensitive power which they may possibly possess (and which consequently resides in a nerve or something analogous to it, as the organ alone which is appropriated to fulfil that office) as much as the faculty which we behold in the oyster, of opening its shell at the afflux of the tide. This nervous power however, if it be one, does not extend throughout the whole of the veget- able system, it is principally confined to the efflor- escence, at the particular time in which it be- comes 99 cotnes unfolded, and when it is about to fulfil the final cause of its existence, in the production of fructification* Admitting the possibility that something like a nervous arrangement may exist in a few species of vegetables, in those which approximate the closest to the first order of the animal tribe; it does not however appear that the anatomist has detected its existence, or the physiologist ex- plored its power, in that large and interme- diate class of beings which connect the higher orders of vegetables with the lowest of the ani- mal kingdom. The hydra, or semi-transparent polypus, when examined in the best light through the strongest magnifying microscope seems to be nothing else than a granular sub- stance, something like boiled sago, connected to- gether into a distinct and organized form by the medium of a gelatinous substance* In the zoophytes and the lowest order of vermes, the whole of their fabric is nearly of the same simple construction ; the power of digest- h 2 ing 100 ing or assimilating the matter of the medium in which they are placed, extends over the surface of their system, similar to vegetables ; insomuch that when the whole is cut into parts each por- tion possesses within itself the power of gener- ation and nutrition. As we ascend in the scale of animals we are able to distinguish between different classes of each a considerable degree of difference in the organization of which they are composed; their digestive organs instead of being dispersed over the whole external surface of their frame, have a particular organ to which this office is especial- ly allotted ; whilst vegetables in general act up- on the fluid matter by which they are surround- ed and convert it into nourishment; animals in general, on the contrary, select it by means of the organs of sense with which they are sup- plied. Such indeed is the absolute magnitude of the organs of sense in these beings that they can be easily detected— the caterpillar has six eyes on each side, and in the snail its eyes are distinctly visible at the extremity of each of its horns, 101 horns, exclusive of which a number of fibrils arise from its mouth, which no doubt impart to the sense of taste an exquisite degree of sen- sibility. In the bee the eyes are not only of a very large size, but owing to the peculiarity in their con- struction, the area of their surface becomes won- derfully extended; in shape they are like a dia- mond, having at least one hundred surfaces, by means of which they are enabled to take within their sphere of vision a great number of ob* jects. The optic nerves of fish far surpass in magni- tude and power those of terrestrial animals ; Dr. Monro, who has written professedly upon the subject, says that the weight of the eye of a cod, and the depth of its axis are equal to those of an ox ; added to which there is a substance called tipitum placed at the bottom of the eye, which it is supposed acts like a mirror in reflecting the luminous rays, so as to enable the other parts of the organ of the eye to condense them into a H 3 focus 102 focus : by these means the concentration of the light to one point is so great that fish can see and distinguish distinctly objects at night; and it is probably with a view that they should be con- stantly on their guard, and be better able to avoid those animals to which they serve as prey that they are destitute of eye-lids. The optic power of serpents and of birds in general, and more especially of the predacious order, is so well known as scarcely to require any detail.* * Mr. Barber, in the year 177 S, being in company with se- veral gentlemen in Bengal, whilst on a shooting party killed a wild hog, which they left close to their tent, on the surface of the earth ; in less than one hour after it had been killed, at the time that the sky was so serene that there was not a cloud ob- servable, a small dark spot at an immense distance in the air, attracted 'their notice; this spot gradually increased in size, and they soon found that it was a vulture which was flying in a di- rect line towards the dead animal on which it immediately alighted for the purpose of devouring. In less than an hours time seventy vultures came from all directions, some horizon- tally but the major part descended from the upper regions, in which a few minutes before, no appearance of them was dis- cernable. such 103 Such, indeed, is the exquisite sensibility of the eye of birds, that they are provided with a mem- brane (the membrana nictitans), which they are enabled to spread over the external surface of it, so as to protect the retina from the injuries which it might sustain on particular occasions from the irritation of the solar rays ; and we all lenow that the owl and other birds are unable to bear the light of day, and that they conse- quently venture abroad during the night season only. The extraordinary faculty which these organs of sense possess, is manifested under a multitude of circumstances, which almost challenge our credibility. Carrier pklgeons have been trans- ported to different and remote parts of different countries, and upon being released from their confinement have returned with a letter round their necks to the very spot from whence they had been transported. The olfactory powers of dogs of particular species are equally certain; they are enabled to follow with the greatest ra- pidity the game which they pursue by the efflu- h 3 via 104 via on the surface ; and however extraordinary it may appear, I have been assured that a dog belonging to a regiment, which it was accom- panying in its march from Gloucester to Green- wich, and which had been stolen in the Borough, after making its escape, returned, two days after to the head quarters at Gloucester, where it was received by an officer who had been left behind. It is unnecessary for me to go into a more par- ticular detail of the power which the organs of sense in animals possess ; it would however lead to this general conclusion, that they are far more active and acute than they are in the human species. Without the intervention of these organs of sense it is impossible that animals could obtain any knowledge of external objects ; without the eye of colour, without the ear of sound, without the olfactory sense of flavour, without the ton- gue of sapid bodies, and without the sensitive nerves of sensation ; this sentient power seems in- 105 inherent in the nerves which the organs of sense contain, and are the seat in which the proximate cause of sensation actually abides. The cause of sensation as I have before explained does not abide in the external substance, but in the organ by which the impression is receiv- ed ; it is owing to this sensitive power that we behold animals display fondness and aversion, action and remission, appetite and inanition: it is by the energy of these organs, that animals are able to distinguish without experience in an intuitive manner, not only the fitness of the medium in which by nature they are destined to reside, but the substances also which are best fitted for the support and nourishment of their frame; by which the duck and the chick in ova after having pecked open the shell in which they were enclosed, take different directions ; the one waddles into the water the other hops into the barn ; that the infant as soon as it is born ex- presses by the motion of its tongue and lips its wants and its appetites, why it selects milk and rejects vinegar ; that we behold in the leech its fondness for blood and its aversion to salt. It 106 It is by the perfection of this sensitive power which these organ s of sense con tain,that th eir ener- gy is strong, and that the gratification of the appe- tite is the object to which all their actions tend, ai:d the motive by which they are impelled; by «ense without reason, by blind impulse, by fatal necessity, by brutal instinct; the final cause of which seems to be the gratification of the appe- tite as the means, and the propagation of the species as tlie end. With the human species it is far otherwise ; the inferiority of the organs of sense in man with relation to those belonging to animals in general, and the lower order in particular, as well as the faculties of strength and of motion, of sensation and of propagation, evidently prove that a mere animal existence is not his true destination. If the end of human existence depended on the extent and perfection of living power, he would, in that case not only be inferior to the brute, but the brute itself would be inferior to the ve- getable species : if it depended on the extent ana perfection in the organs of sense, the condi- tion 107 tion of the brutes would be far superior to the condition of man, since the organs of sense in the one are far more perfect than they are found to exist in the other. What man is there whose digestive organs are equal in power to those of animals in general. I have seen the stomach of a cod contain a large haddock, the haddock to have within its stomach a whiting, and the whiting a smelt. The shark has been known at one morsel to devour a man, and the large boa snake has swal- lowed, without any mastication, animals of consi- derable magnitude, not only pigs and deer, but a buffalo also. With respect to the power in the organs of sense, the superiority of brutes over the human species is equally evident. What man is there whose eye is equal in acuteness to predacious birds, or to the animals of the feline race? whose olfactory organs can bear any comparison with many species of dogs? whose muscles are equally strong as those of the lion or the elephant; an ele- 103 elephant by the power of its proboscis will raise with the greatest ease a thirty two pounder ; and a lion, by a stroke of his paw, will break the back bone of a horse, seize, and carry him off between his jaws, and afterwards devour him for food ; what individual is there whose loco motive powers are equal to those of the most sluggish greyhound? whilst our best pedestrians believe that they have performed feats the most astonishing, by walking for four or five succes- sive days forty or fifty miles, assisted by inter- vals of sleep and generous diet — different kinds of fish will traverse, without resting or sleeping, from one continent to another; and it is a well known fact that the same shark has followed the track of the same ship from theindian ocean to the English channel, in order to devour the offal by which it was allured, and which had been thrown overboard. If the comparison between vegetables and animals, and especially the human species, were made, w T ith respect to the means by which their wants are supplied, we should be led to admit the 109 the self sufficiency of the one and the total in- digency of the other ; whilst vegetables flourish and evolve for months, years, and even centu- ries, by means of fluids only, — of the simple nour- ishment of water and of air, which they prin- cipally receive through the medium of the soil, the latter require not fluids only, but solids also. In the one the conversion of the food from a a common to a living state is accomplished by the easiest possible means, in the other the agency of different organs is necessary before the process of assimilation can be accomplish- ed. Whilst the former flourish and propa- gate without the necessity of having organs of apprehension, on the contrary such is the imper r feet condition of the latter in these respects, that without organs of apprehension, they could not possibly obtain the means of support, they would perish for want, without fulfilling the end of their existence. f ' If we were to descend to particulars we should be at once convinced of the indigency of the higher order of animals, in the propagat- ing 110 ing power which they possess with relation to those of a lower class, and more especially to vegetables in general. An elephant seldom pro- duces more than one young in the course of two years, whilst, on the contrary, rabbits propagate every six weeks : this power increases in an in- finite degree as we descend in the scale of ani- mation. Hens frequently lay forty or fifty eggs in one season, and when we reflect that pigeons can hatch nine times in one year, it appears that they can multiply their species, in four years, near fourteen thousand times. In the amphibia this prolific power is equally observable; there was a turtle killed in London a few years ago out of which two thousand five hundred eggs were obtained: the quantity of ova that fish evolve is so immense that they are often known to cover, for the space of many leagues, the surface of the ocean. We all see the multitude of maggots that are generated in rotten cheese, and of different insects that are produced in different substances which are under going the procees of putrifaction and fermenta- tion Ill tion ; and a single mite has been known in the course of a few days to re-produce its species at least one thousand times. If we cast our eyes on the surface of the earth we shall be convinced of the prolific powers of vegetables and of the lower order of animals, with relation to those of an higher class. One single plant of elecampane shall frequently produce in one season three thousand seeds, the poppy three thousand four hundred, the sun-flower four thousand, the tobacco plant has been known to bring to maturity fcrty thousand three hundred and twenty seeds. — The astonishing power with which God has endued the vegetable creation, to multiply its different species is more especially manifest- ed in the elm ; it is said, by Dr. Clark, that this tree produces upwards of one thousand five hun- dred million of seeds, and each of these seeds has the power of producing the same number. How astonishing is this produce! at first one seed is de- posited in the earth ; from this one a tree springs, which in the course its vegetative life produces one thou- 112 thousand five hundred and eighty-four millions of seeds, — this is the first generation. The se- cond generation will amount to two trillions, five hundred and ten thousand, and fifty- six billions. The third generation will a- mount to fourteen thousand six hundred and fifty eight quadrillions, seven hundred and twenty seven thousand* and forty trillions ! And the fourth generation from these would amount to fifty one sextillions, four hundred, and eighty- one thousand three hundred and eighty -one quin tillions, one hundred and twenty* three thousand one hundred and thirty-six quadril- lions ! sums too immense for the human mind to conceive; aud when we allow the most con- fined space in which a tree can grow, it appears that the seeds of the third generation from one elm would be many myriads of times more than suffi- cient to stock thewhole superficies of all the planets in the solar system! If it was not therefore for the destruction which vegetables sustain, by the various animals to which they afford nourishment and to whose use they subserve, not only the bosom 113 bosom but the surface of the earth would form a vast animated column. Whatever the imagery of poets may have con* ceived of the loves of plants, or been asserted by Linnaeus of the sexual system, the truth con- tinues to be very questionable and uncertain. The various modes by which the species are mul- tiplied, and the destitute state of nervous energy in the parts which are concerned in that process decidedly prove that they are not only insensi- ble to any feeling but, altogether unconscious of the actions which they perform ; if any nervous ar- rangement has an actual existence in them it does not extend throughout the whole of the system but is confined to the efflorescence alone, at the particular times, when the corrolla is unfolded, and when the system is about to fulfil the end of its existence, in the production of fructifica- tion: how debile and limited must this nervous power be conceived, when we reflect on the immoveable spot to which vegetables are fixed, and the short life the efflorescence is suffered to enjoy ; it is no sooner arrived at its i adolescence, 114 adolescence than its acme of perfection is attain- ed, and the period of caducity immediately en- sues. The system proceeds from germination to fructification, from fructification to death, in a regular and unbroken tenor, without possessing so far as we can detect, any opposing or con- troling power, by whose energy the vital actions can be arrested or suppressed.* By the condition of animals, as well as of the human species itself during sleep, and more es- pecially as they subsist in the foetal state, some idea may be formed of the nature of vegetable existence : the foetus extracts nourishment from the maternal system to which it is attached as a cherry to the parent stock. Although it possesses organs of sense it is destitute of feel- ing; and with organs of consciousness and of apprehension, it neither reflects on the means of supporting itself or is sensible of its own ex- istence ; an animal in the foetal state is situated in a manner exactly like to an adult in a profound sleep, and both resemble vegetable life. During sleep all the organs which sub- * Mr. A. Knight has decidedly proved that vegetables have no sensation. serve 115 serve to the growth and nutrition of the- system perform their functions more perfectly than they are found to do during* a state of watchfulness* Respiration and digestion, absorption and circu- lation, secretion as well as excretion go on with-' out the energy of the will ; the energy of the will has a tendency to impede these different func- tions in their course: it is not the existence of these organs which subserve to these purposes, which constitute the distinguishing characteris- tic between vegetables and animals, as Mr. Hunter imagined. However varied these organs maybe which subserve to the growth and support of the system in animals, from what they are in vegetables, they all subserve the same use, and are regulated by the same laws: in all they are intended to build and to erect a system in the best possible way, fitted and adapted to perform certain determinate ends. It is because the ends are different in each that there exists a diversity in the means ; whilst the existence of a sensitive principle, of which a nervous system is the immediate recipient, to me appears to form the distinction between the one and the i 2 other ' 116 other, and not the existence of a stomach, as Mr. Hunter supposed, so the magnitude of the brain with relation to the organs of sense, forms the principal grounds of difference between irra- tional and rational animals, between brutes and the human species. In the larvae and zoop- hytes, and that large and intermediate class of beings which connect the vegetable with the animal kingdom, although there is a structure of a nervous appearance, which is expanded over the whole surface, the existence of a brain, is not discernible; as we advance, however, from these inferior orders of beings to those of a higher class the existence of nerves and of brain, as or- gans separate and distinct, may easily be traced ; the brain increases in magnitude from insects to fish, from fish to birds, from birds to qua- drupeds, from quadrupeds to bipeds, from the black to the white of the human species. The physiologists who first directed their at- tention to this subject, proceeded on wrong data; instead of comparing the magnitude of the brain with relation to the size of the nerves which proceed 117 proceed from it, they compared the relation which it bore to the aggregate weight of the body. It is not therefore surprizing that from data such as these the most inconclusive reasonings should have been made. To Professor Soemmering considerable merit is due, for having put the subject upon its true footing; he it was who first pointed out that the magnitude of the brain with relation to the nerves of sense which proceeded from it, was the true point from whence the comparison was to be made; it was from this mode of investigation that it was found that although the most irrational systems have the largest nerves of sense, they have the smallest brain, and on the contrary, that the highest orders of animals have the largest brain with organs of sense comparatively small. In the snail the brain is composed of a congrega- tion of nervous fibrils, which terminate in a sort of trunk of a semicircular structure. A shark that weighs 300lbs. it is said has a brain that does not weigh more than three ounces, and in fish in general the brain occu- pies a small part only of the whole cranium. Redder says that the weight of the brain of an t 3 ox 118 ox to that of its body is as 1 to 1154; and Blumenbatch asserts that the largest brain which he ever saw of an horse, weighed only one pound four ounces; in the human species on the contrary, Baron Haller observes, that in a boy six years old, whose body weighed fifty pounds the brain weighed two pound three ounces and a half, and when it is fully developed, it may generally be averaged in each individual at the rate of four pounds. Whoever contemplates with attention the ac- tual state of things will be led to conclude that all the phenomena which are cognizable to our senses, that all the productions which nature exhibits to our view, are effects only of pre-ex- isting causes. That re-action, for example is the effect of elasticity, expansion of expansi- bility, organization of life, sensation of sensibi- lity, and intellection of intellect; instead how- ever of considering that the organs which ani- mated beings possess were constructed as means with a view to ends ; by the anatomist and physiologist the organs which receive the participation of the*se powers, are consider- ed 119 ed in the same light as a builder does the materials of which the carcase of a house is made; instead of ascribing to these principles the effects which they produce, it is the ma- terials alone of which the machine is built to which the whole power is referred: this silly hypothesis is at once refuted, by the total im- possibility which exists of giving a rational an- swer to this simple question ; to the question which I have often had occasion to put to many of our physiologists, w r ho entertain different op- pinions ; What is the cause of organization? what is the cause that the multitude of seeds and of eggs which are deposited in the same soil and exposed to the same air, are able to act upon the different substances by which they are surrounded ; to convert them from a dead to a living state, from a state of dispersion to a state of combination, from a tabula rasa to organiza- tion and form, from chaos itself into symmetry and order, and from a multitude of separate parts into one whole system, total and complete? Although I have frequently heard much inge- nuity displayed in reasoning upon this super- t 4 structure, 120 structure, I have often witnessed much folly and ignorance in attempts to account for the foundation of it; instead of supposing that the different organs which different beings possess are the recipients only of these different powers, and that the matter of which they are composed would without them be as imbecile and inert as the shoe is without the foot, or as the musical instrument is without the art or skill of the musician : it is^the matter alone to which the whole power is referred. An hypothesis such as this is not more absurd than that which is assumed, that the organs with which living beings are endowed are the cause primary and efficient of which vitality and intellect are the effect. With as much reason might it be affirmed that the pen with which I write moves my hand, instead of my hand moving the pen ; that the top moves the whip, instead of the whip moving the top ; that language is the cause of which rationality is the effect, that the nucleus of the earth as well as the dirt and mud upon its surface are the causes of which vitality is the effect; that the whole material world is in fact the great first cause of which 121 which the Almighty is the secondary or instru- mental cause; that is to say, that the second cause is the cause of the first, and that the ef- fect produced is the cause of the cause. It evidently appears these gentlemen begin where they ought to end : instead of attributing inertness to matter, they make it the first cause of motion ; they behold it destitute of form and of fabricating power, and yet refer organization to its imbecility ; they see it matter impelled and yet they make it impelling matter; instead of considering it the last and lowest of things, they make it the first and the best : instead of separating the cause from the effect, they con- stantly confound both together; they mistake the thing produced for the power -producing, the fact (the thing done), for the law. Instead of putting confusion into order they put order into confusion. The consequences of this false philoso- phy are manifested by the puerile knowledge which we possess, being entirely circumscribed to effects only, without any knowledge of cause, to ends without means, to history without defi- nition, 122 nition, to definition without axiom, and finally to a nomenclature which never designates the nature of the thing which it is designed to proclaim. It is high time that absurdities such as these should be banished from our schools of science, and the rising generation rescued from the con- tamination which they in consequence suffer. So long, however, as the false hypothesis con- tinues to prevail, that matter is the cause of which life and soul are the effects, no hopes whatever can be entertained of any philosophical reformation. 1 nevertheless will maintain that these opinions are not the offspring of ignorance simply, but of two-fold ignorance, of that state of ignorance by which men persevere in error without being conscious of it, and which seers the mind against conviction and reproof: to me however it appears that if the soul contained parts, it must be divisible, and if it were divi- sible it would be destructible, and if it was de- structible it would be a composite, and if it were a composite it would have the triple di- mensions 123 mensions of length, breath, and thickness, as the common attributes belonging to matter in gene- ral. If this was the case the accumulation of ideas would necessarily be followed by an in- crease in the bulk of the organ by which those ideas were received : it is however very evident that so far from the attributes of thle mind pro- ducing or increasing the bulk in the body, that the body by the exercise of the mind is rendered more active and energetic; that instead of manifest- ing to the organs of sense any sensible qualities, it is altogether insensible to them : and instead of being nourished like the organs of nutrition, the food which is congenial to the nature of mind is such alone as flows from reason and understand- ing: it is therefore legitimate to conclude that the soul is not corporeal, but immaterial; that it is simple and without parts and consequently indestructible and immortal, for dissolution can only arise from the separation of one part of a thing from another, but which can never take place in a principle which is essentially ♦simple. If 124 If the attributes of mind depend on organiza- tion how is it possible that any permanent idea of things can take place ? for those ideas could never survive the duration of the particles of matter which subsist in the organ by which those ideas were received: memory therefore could form no part of such a system* » Experiments however go to prove that the most solid, in common with the softer and more fluid parts of the body, are in a state of constant flow and change, that animals whose bones had been tinctured and coloured red by the madder with which they had been fed, had recovered their usual complection in the course of seven years after the madder had been discontinued: we may from this infer that as the more tender parts of the system are more rapidly carried away, that consequently the recollection of past events could never extend beyond that period. Cases have also occurred when pati- ents, in consequence of disease, have forgotten recent events, and nevertheless possessed per- fect recollection of those which had happened long 125 long before. A curious instance of this kind happened to a man who was brought to St. Thomas's Hospital with a concussion of his brain ; by proper treatment he recovered ; it was observed during the progress of his cure, that although he spoke to the attendants it was in a language which none of them understood; a Welch milk woman who came into the ward, having heard him speak, entered into conversa- tion with him ; it was then fouud that the man by birth was a Welchman, that he had left his native land in his youth, that he had forgotten his mother tongue, and that for the last thirty years he had spoken the English language alone; since the accident "of which he was recovered he only remembered the events of his younger days, but had entirely forgotten the English language and the occurrences of the latter years of his life. The opinions which are entertained respect- ing the materiality of the soul, have not even the merit of novelty in them ; they have been enter- tained by different men at remote periods, as well 126 well as in move modern days : by none however have they been proved to be false and absurd by arguments more legitimate than by Dr. S. Clarke, a century and a halfago,in the controversy which he maintained with Mr. Dodwel the ma- terialist. In the hope that the force of his rea- soning may produce the same conviction to others that it has lone to me, I shall for that purpose select a passage on the subject from his valuable work : — " That the soul," says he, " cannot possibly be material, is demonstrable from the single con- sideration of bare sense or consciousness itself; for matter being a divisible substance, consist- ing always of separable, nay, of actually sepa- rate and distinct parts, it is plain that unless it were essentially conscious, in which case every particle of matter must consist of innumerable separate and distinct consciousnesses, no sys- tem of it, in any posible composition or division can be one individual conscious being. For supposing three or four hundred particles of matter, at a mile or any given distance one from another 127 another, is it possible that all these separate parts should, in that state, be one individual conscious being? Suppose then all these par- ticles brought together into one system, so as to touch one another, will they thereby, or by any motion or composition whatever, become one whit less truly distinct beings than they were when at the greatest distance? How then can their being disposed in any possible system make them one individual conscious being? If you would suppose God, by his infinite power, superadding consciousness to the united parti- cles, yet still these particles, being really and truly as distinct beings as ever, cannot be them- selves the subject in which that individual consciousness inheres : but the consciousness can only be superadded by the addition of some thing, which in all the particles must still itself be but one individual being. The soul, there- fore, whose power of thinking is undeniably one individual consciousness, cannot possibly be a material substance. If, however, it be supposed that the soul is a material substance, and that the brain, or any other part whatever is the organ 128 organ where it resides, it must evidently follow that the quality of this organ must be made up of the individual qualities of all its parts : for example, the bulk of the body is made up of the sum of the magnitude of all its parts ; its motion is nothing but the sum of the mo- tion of all its parts ; and if thinking or consci- ousness can be supposed to be a quality in- herent in a system of matter, it must be also the sum and result of the thinking and cogitation of all its separate parts. We should therefore have as many distinct consciousnesses or minds as there are particles of matter of which the brain consists, an idea fanciful and false; for composition or division ot magnitude varied in an infinite manner to eternity, can produce nothing in the whole system but magnitude, composition and variation of motiom : nothing but motion, com- position, and variation of figure, nothing but figure, and so of every other quality whatever. If however it be supposed that not the brain altoge- ther, but one particle of it alone, is the seat of the soul, &c. that one particle being divisible into two, there 129 there must consequently exist two souls, not one soul in the same system, and that each must think and be conscious apart and not to- gether." I shall not attempt to weaken the force of Dr. Samuel Clark's arguments by adding to them any observations of my own ; to every rational and unprejudiced mind they will appear con- clusive : that no modification whatever of matter has of itself either the power of organizing itself into form, much less of feeling and of thinking; the analogy which exists between the vital or- gans of animals, and the whole vegetable king- dom, although it proves that the living princi- ple by which the system was formed is of the same nature in all, that it nevertheless is desti- tute of sensation or of consciousness. With re- spect to animals the case is totally different, the actual existence of organs not only of sensa- tion but of consciousness, show that they both feel and think; the meerest worm that crawls upon the surface of the earth feels a consciousness of pleasure and of pain, of appe- k tite 130 tite and gratification, of security and of danger; it not only seeks for the means of satisfying its wants, but is conscious of the danger to which it is exposed from different animals by whom it is devoured or destroyed; we therefore see it shrink beyond their reach. Mr. Locke observes " that animals seem to have perceptions of particular truths, and within very narrow limits the faculty of reason; but We have no reason," says he, " for sup- posing that their natural operations are performed with the view to consequences, and therefore not the result of a train of reasoning in the mind of the animal. All the voluntary motions, on the contrary, which animals perform, to me appear the result of a motive Which exists in them, and that the organs which they employ have objects for their end. The acquisition of food and of intercourse are the consequences of the natural actions which we behold every animal display, it is the nature of this impulse or motive, through the power of which those actions are produced, that constitutes the distinction in the appetites of different animated beings, to the gratification ' of which all their pursuits are especially directed. The 131 The extensive power in them which the organs of sense possess are more especially calculated to attain those ends which in the great scheme of providence they are destined to perform: the sense of want and of appetite which the organs suffer, constitutes the impulse from whence all their actions spring, and to the relief and grati- fication of which all their actions are especially directed. It is the power from whence the impulse arises which may be called instinct. It constitutes the principle, by the energy of which certain organs are employed to perform certain determinate actions with the view to cer- tain ends or consequences ; they are impelled by natural and blind impulse which they know not and cannot resist ; by fatal necessity, by- brutal appetites. Beings such as these cannot be considered accountable for the actions that they perform more than vegetables, which neither feel or re- flect; these actions are always limited and direct- ed within the narrow limits of (their particular in- stincts ; however varied in their direction in differ- k 2 ent 132 ent beings those instincts may be, they are invari- ably the same throughout the life of the same indivi- dual, as well as of all belonging to the same class, and are at once perfect,not by previous instruction, or even imitation, but by a sort of intuitive power which is possessed throughout the whole race of animated beings : every particular class therefore perform the same actions in the same way, and with the same degrees of perfection ; the works of animals are indeed like the works of nature, so perfect in their kind that they can bear the most critical examination of the mechanic and mathe- matician : no human art has ever been able to imi- tate the wonderful machinery constructed by the power of a bee, or the webb by the tenta- cula of the spider. It has been well observed by Dr. Reed, whose authority upon these sub- jects must carry with it great weight, that every manufactoring art amongst men, was invented by some man, improved by others, and brought to perfection by time and experience : the arts of men vary in every age and in every nation, and are known only to those men who have been taught them ; but the manufactories of animals differ 133 differ in toto from those of man. No animal of the species can claim the invention, and no one ever brought any one improvement, or any variation from the former practice ; every one of the species has equal skill from the beginning without teaching, without experience, and with- out habits, and every one has its art by a kind of inspiration ; not inspired with the principles or rules of art, but with the ability of working it to perfection without any previous knowledge of its principles, rules, or ends. If I were to enter into a particular examina- tion of the corporeal means which are possess- ed by the higher and lower order of beings, I should be led to acknowledge the total indigen- cy of the one, and the self-sufficiency of the other. Whilst vegetables shed their seed upon the soil, and fish deposit their spawn upon the wa- ters, and different birds lay their eggs upon the sand, such is the perfection of the living power which they possess, that the aptitude in the me- dium alone in which they are placed is in gene- ral adequate to answer every purpose of their k 3 evolution 134 evolution and growth. In the higher orders of beings, on the contrary, the evolution of the off- spring during the whole period of gestation, is totally indigent of parental aid. The difficulty and concomitant danger of parturition progres- sively increases from the most simple to the most complicated system, from brutes to the human species, and more especially from savage to civil life. The labor and anguish of the maternal sufferings, untill that awful and important pro- cess is accomplished ; the lamentations and cries of the infant as soon as it is born ; the total incapacity to assist itself or to obtain its own necessary wants, all prove the imperfection and indigency of the human frame. The sense of want which the organs feel, and the impression from external objects are nearly alike in the infant state of savage as of civil life, all seem to have the same desires and the same pur- suits, and at that early period human life is entirely of an animal nature: it is equally the case with savage nations in general ; amongst them the rules of social order are entirely inverted ; the weak fall a prey 135 prey to the strong; women, instead of being the companions, are the slaves of the men; rapine is no crime where honesty is no virtue ; killing is no murder where personal revenge is allowed, and neither adultery or fornication are con- sidered to constitute crimes, where promis- cuous and incestuous intercourse are tolerated. Amongst them intemperance is preferred to so- briety, ignorance mistaken for knowledge, the passions and appetites of youth preferred to the wisdom and virtue of age. A state such as this of degeneracy and of corruption may be consi- dered the condition of man, when he allows him- self to follow the pursuits alone to which he is impelled by the force of sensual inclination. It is this condition as St. Paul tells the Ro- mans, in his letter to them, by which they were degraded and debased: that they were impelled to act by the force of passion without reason ; that they had the propensities and followed the pur- suits of the brute without his instinct; that they led, in fact, a life of sense without reason ; he tells them that there was a law in their mem- bers which warred against the law of their minds, k 4 that 136 that the good, says he, that I do I would not, — but the evil which I would not that I did. A condition such as this is not the condition for which man was designed ; it proves what he 7nay, not what he ought to become; it proves that the more he indulges his senses, the power of his mind becomes progressively weaken- ed, that instead of attaining the prerogative of being a free agent, he continues in the condi- tion of a child, or that of a man who lives like a brute, impelled and chained down by that fatal necessity of sin which he cannot avoid. Although there are many parts in Mr. Locke's book that have a tendency to favour the doctrine that human actions are the result of necessity, which the individual cannot prevent, it is not always the case ; for on many occasions he is either driven or led to acknowledge the free agency of man : " This I think," says Mr. Locke, " is at least evident, that we find in ourselves a power to begin or forbear, continue or end seve- ral actions of our minds or motions of our bodies, barely 137 barely by a thought or preference of the mind, ordering, or, as it were commanding, the doing, or not doing, such or such a particular action. The power which the mind has thus to order the consideration of any idea, or the forbearing to consider it, or to prefer the motion of any part of the body to its rest, and vice versa, in any particular instance, is what we call the Will."* Miserable indeed would be the condition of man if the fatal necessity to obey the force of passion to which the sensualist and the de- praved are doomed, extended to the whole race; if he was destitute of the power of directing and of regulating the ideas which in consequence arise, or if none subsist but what were excited by objects of sense. It has been well observed by Dr. Gregory, on the inconsistency of the Fatalists, that if this were the case there could be no variety, and scarcely any change in the pursuits of men ; the * Locke's Essay, c. iy. c. 21. thoughts 138 thoughts must flow from each other in one un- interrupted series, and man could not be an ac- countable, and scarcely a rational being. It is however very plain that we have a power of in- terrupting a train of thoughts and of dwelling more intensely upon particular ideas, and even of occasionally directing our reflections and contemplations into new channels; and this power alone is sufficient to constitute man a free agent. Although the organs of sense are the avenues through which impressions from external objects are first made, it is by the native vigor and power of the mind from whence ideas are made to flow; that whilst the spark comes from without, the flame resides within; although it isset in motion by external means, it is from the power of mind alone by which those ideas and motions ought to be directed. It is the particular nature of this intellec- tual power which constitutes the distinguishing characteristic between excellence and mediocri- ty 139 ty, that ought to mark out the individual from the species; the man from the brute, and form the real source of distinction in the attributes by which different men ought to be estimated. It is to the motives which spring and originate from the mind more than from the effects which are produced by the organs as the instruments to which we ought to attach merit or disgrace for the actions they perform. It is from principles such as these that we ought to conclude that the man of science is better than the artist; the wis- dom and temperance of age better than the ap- petite and passion of youth ; and civil life better than either savage or brutal. It is by the proper exercise of these powers of intellect directed and exerted on those ob- jects which seem to be congenial to its nature, by which man feels conscious that he consti- tutes the first of all generated beings ; that al- though excited by appetite and sense, he is ne- vertheless able to resist, to subdue, and even to act in opposition to those wants; often com- pelling 140 pelling the body to fast when it craves for food, to receive medicines which convey impressions nauseous and painful,exposes it to the inclemency of the seasons, and to various dangers ; to la- bour and to fatigue, and patiently to submit to death itself. Decus et decorum est pro patria mori. It was this sentiment which prevailed in Cato's mind, that enabled him to despise the danger and the disgrace to which he was ex- posed by the tyranny of Caesar ; he felt that the soul, secure within itself, could smile at the drawn dagger and defy its point ; that it could flourish in immortal youth, unhurt amidst the war of elements and the crush of worlds. Admiting the truth of these observations, and which must have been apparent to every reflect- ing mind, the conclusion presses itself upon the understanding with force irresistible, that the final cause, or the end for which man was creat- ed, is totally different to that of any other being whatever ; instead of being confined like veget- ables, to the production of the species, or as in the 141 the brutes to the gratification of the senses ; these objects constitute in man the lowest of the ends which he is designed to attain; those which are most congenial to his nature, and which form the true end of his existence, more especially consist in the perfection of Ms mind, in order that he may be qualified to adore the Almighty and become acceptable to him. Whilst the attributes of vegetables consist in the living and vegetable principles alone, those of brutes in the vegetative, the sensitive, and the irrational; man, on the contrary, in addition to these, possesses the intellective also ; and may be defined " a rational soul in an animal body, which it employs as its instrument" Say, why was Man so eminently rais'd Amid the vast creation? why empower'd Thro' life and death to dart his watchful eye, With thoughts beyond the limits of his frame; But that th' Omnipotent might send him forth In sight of Angels and immortal mind, As on an ample theatre, to join In contest with his equals ; who shall best The 142 TV task atchieve, the course of noble toils By wisdom or by mercy pre-ordain'd.* Might send him forth the sov'reign good to learn : To chase each meaner purpose from his breast, And thro' the mists of passion and of sense, And thro' the pelting storms of chance and pain, To hold straight on, with constant heart and eye Still fixt upon his everlasting palm, The approving smile of heaven? Akenside's Pleas, of Irnag. I • * No doctrine has ever, perhaps, been more completely mis- taken than that of predestination. By many it has been thought that some there were who were elected and predestined to enjoy every blessing in this life, and happiness in the next, notwith- standing the wickedness of their conduct; others again that were doomed to suffer every misfortune in this* state of existence and to endure eternal damnation hereafter, however meritorious their conduct might have been. If this explanation were true, instead of the Almighty being what he is, all bounteous, wise, and just, and the source of all goodness, it might rather be sup- posed that he is the very devil himself, and the cause of all evil. Great indeed is the error of those who judge in this way. It is Very true that hi the general scheme of Providence predestination is a doctrine especially foretold by revelation, that shall be the lot of the elect ; but the elect grossly deceive themselves, if any there ar6 who suppose themselves pre-elected ; the only way they can make their election sure is by religion and the duties it enjoins. It is not therefore particular men that are elected, but men of a particular description, which description the gospel has parti- cularly designated* CHAP. CHAPTER VI. OF THE MEANS BY WHICH INDIVIDUALS AT- TAIN THE END, OR FINAL CAUSE OF THEIR EXISTENCE. EDUCATION and instruction are the means by which the final destination of man is attain- ed, and by which the necessary media are found to connect the dawn of reason to the full perfec- tion of it. Education constitutes the genus of which instruction is the species. Education comprehends thegeneral habits,manners,and cus- toms of the inhabitants, and from whence there is a national character belonging to every people. Instruction on the contrary is limited and con- fined to the particular direction given to genius, and 144 and is the cause why particular classes of men have the same habits, and different individuals particular propensities and pursuits. Educa- tion in fact bears the same relation to instruc- tion that a whole does to a part, or that memory does to recollection. Memory repesents things past in general, recollection represents things past in particular. The necessity of early dis- cipline and instruction has been acknowledged by the wise and the good of eveiy age. Solo- mon declared " that if you train up a child in the way it should go, and when he grows old he shall not depart from it. By Horace, Qui studet optatam cursu contingere Metam. Multa tulit fecitque pucr. In every species of knowledge whatever, the most simple must be apprehended before the most compound ; it is in learning this simple and elementary knowledge for which early in- struction is especially designed, in order that we may be enabled to comprehend that which is uni- versal. To every reflecting mind it must indeed be obvious that all knowledge whatever which ap- pertains 145 pertained to science or to art, is reducible to gene- ral principles as certainly as that every effect is the consequence of some producing cause. — Many men who have not learnt the principles of particular sciences, can frequently assign rea- sons, or the cause ivhy, for the effects which they behold ; they seem intuitively to possess a de- gree of science, and to attain rules by chance, which instruction is especially designed to un- fold. Mr. Harris, therefore, very accurately ob- serves, that in the investigation of principles, we are first taught to learn that every science, as arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy, &c. may be resolved into its theorem, every theorem into its syllogism, every syllogism into its pro- position, and every proposition into certain sim- ple or single terms. If we were to begin the discussion of any branch of science before we have attained a knowledge of simple terms, which are in them- selves irresolvable, it is evident we should begin in the middle ; and if we were to begin at the theorem itself, before having attained a precise l know- 146 knowledge of a syllogism and of a proposition, we should begin not merely at the middle but at the very end : it is therefore simple terms which constitute the base, the punctum saliens from whence all scientific knowledge ought to commence, and that beginning from other data not only leads to hypothesis but is an in- verted order of learning* It is by the previous attainment of this simple knowledge, that we become qualified to learn the connecting media, of which the most com- pound knowledge is composed ; by which the extreme parts, the beginning and the end are united, so as to form one whole. It -in this in- vestigation that the office of science consists, and which forms the true object of its pursuit. Science therefore begins from principles and proceeds through proper media to the conclu- sion; from cause to effect, from things general and universal to things particular and acci- dental. Things 147 Things universal, or principles, consist of simple undeniable truths respecting the identi- ty of which every one who has the possession of common seuse must give his unqualified as- sent, and from their majesty and authority are called axioms. The second thing consists in the proposition and the theorem, which may be deduced from those axioms, which are im- mediately founded on them ; and finally the con- clusion by which the things particular are de- duced from things universal: the former forms the base on which all scientific knowledge is founded, the other is the road which leads to it, through which a knowledge of the effects are ob- tained, as they proceed from their producing causes. This power of the mind to learn and to be instructed, by Mr. Harris is called natural ca- pacity, and is an attribute common to all men ; the superior facility of being taught, which some possess above the rest is called genius; the first transition or advances from natural capaci- ty is called proficiency, and the end or comple- l 2 tion 148 tion of proficiency is called hahit : if such habit be conversant about matter purely speculative it is called science ; if it descends from specula- tion to practice it is called art, and if such practice be conversant in regulating the passions it is called moral virtue. Before the habit of moral virtue can be attained, there are many appetites to be curbed, various propensities to be corrected and many temptations to be resis- ted. It was in sciences such as these that the ancients laboured with such ardour and success. Although in latter days the christian dispen- sation has superseded the necessity of the an- cient philosophy; it has nevertheless been the object of study and of admiration of the best and wisest of our divines. I shall rank amongst these the celebrated names of Cudworth, Moore, and Norris, of Bishop Newton, and of that great defender of the christian faith, Bishop Horsley, whom I once heard declare, that his philosophy was Plato's, but his creed St. Johns. Those ancient sages discovered, what divine revelation has siince proclaimed, they discovered the im- soul, 149 materiality and consequent immortality of the soul, and they even aspired to trace the great chain of effects which exist throughout the whole system of nature to their producing causes, so as to connect the first cause with the last matter, and the systems of philosophy by Pythagoras, Soc- rates, and Plato, will ever be acknowledged to consitute the most stupendous monuments of human wisdom that have ever been offered to the world. I am not competent to the task of giving an analysis of the means which they em- ployed, by which they could attain a knowledge of mind, independently of matter, and more especially of the Godhead itself. The resemblance that subsists between the Platonic doctrine and the Christian, Dr. Hors- iey observes, " may seem a wonderful fact, which may justly draw the attention of the seri- ous and inquisitive; and if it should be deemed incredible, as well it may, that reason, in her utmost strength, should ever ascend so high as to attain even to a distant glympse of truths l 3 which 150 which have ever been reckoned the most mys- terious discoveries of revelation; it will become a question of the highest importance to deter- mine by what means the Platonic school came by those notions of the Godhead, which, had they been of a later date than the commence- ment of Christianity, might have passed for a very mild corruption of the christian faith ; but being in truth much older, have all the appear- ance of a near, though very imperfect view of the doctrine which was afterwards current in the christian church." This learned prelate pro- ceeds to say, "that the enquiry becomes more important when it is discovered, that these no- tions were by no means peculiar to the Plato- nic school, that the Platonists pretended to be no more than the expositors of a more ancient doctrine, which is traced from Plato to Par- menides ; from Parmenides to his master of the Pythagorean sect; from the Pythagoreans to Orpheus, the earliest of the Grecian mystago- goues ; from Orpheus to the secret lore of the Egyptian priests, in which the foundation of the Orphic 161 Orphic theology was laid. Similar notions of a triple principle prevailed in the Persian and Chaldaen theology, and vestiges even of the wor- ship of a Trinity were discernible in the Ro- man superstition in a very late age. This wor- ship the Romans had received from their Tro- jan ancestors, for the Trojans brought it with them into Italy from Phrygia ; in Phrygia it was introduced by Dardanus, so early as in the ninth century after Noah's flood. Darda- nus carried it with him from Samothrace, where the personages that were the objects of it were worshipped under the Hebrew name of Cabirim. Who these Cabirims might be, has been a matter of unsuccessful enquiry to many learned men ; the utmost that is known with certainty is, that they were originally three, and were called by way of eminence, the great or mighty ones; for that is the import of the Hebrew name. And of the like signification is their Latin appellation, Penates; dii per quos penitusspiramus, per quos habemus corpus, per quos rationem animi pos- sidemus. Dii qui sunt intrinsecus atque in in- timis penetralibus coeli. Thus the joint wor- l 4 ship 152 ship of Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva, the triad of the Roman capitol, is traced to that of the three mighty ones in Samothrace, which was established in that island, at what precise time it is impossible to determine; but earlier, if Eusebius may be credited, than the days of Abraham. The notion therefore of a Trinity, more or less removed from the Christian faith, is found to have been a leading principle in all the principal schools of philosophy, and is the religion of almost all European nations." »# From the very nature of the ancient philosophy it must appear to have been inadequate to pro- * In the year 1784, Mr. Charles Wilkins translated at Ben- ares an ancient Hindoo poem, called the Bhaquat Geeta, sup- posed to have been five thousand years old, in which the incar- nation of the Deity is evidently proclaimed; and most of the principal tenets of the .Christian religion. This very curious work is now very scarce; but Mr. Morrice, in his Indian Anti- quities, a work of great labour and ability, has given very copi- ous extracts from it, with illustrations, for the benefit of those who have not the advantage of a christian education, or attained any knowledge of the Platonic philosophy; from which source it is probable that it is originally derived. Vide Tracts by the late Bishop Horsley. duce 153 tluce on mankind any general influence; whilst it tended to separate the individual from the mass, it was impossible that the mass of the people, through the medium of a philosophy which they did not understand, could obtain any knowledge of the Almighty. Before the Christian aera the world for the most part was governed by the law of nature and reason ; the ignorance of mankind in gene- ral, which was unequal to the task of attaining the knowledge of philosophy, left his moral con- duct without restraint, and the aberrations of philosophers themselves which had in a great measure perverted the Mosaic law, had intro- duced idolatry in lieu of religion. To destroy the idolatry of those days, to lead men to God, to atone for the sins of the world, and to save from the general condemnation those that would believe and repent ; it pleased the Almighty, when the fulness of time was come, to send his son Jesus Christ, into the world to seek and to save that which was lost; who 154 who was equal to the Father respecting his God- head, but unequal to the Father respecting his manhood. Although perfect God he neverthe- less was perfect man, having a reasonable soul in human flesh subsisting. A dispensation which by the Almighty was intended to be a rule of action to man, in order that he might obtain a knowledge of his Maker, must of neces- sity be amenable to his capacity; he therefore took our nature upon him ; it was this omnipo- tent and self-existing Being who willed to be incarnate in the seed of the woman, without the ordinary means which are necessary for the production of his creatures, that he came into the world : — he came in the flesh, not of the flesh. God was mChrist reconciling the world to himself; manifesting his divinity by his miracles and prophesies,* his precepts, and his example; * The previous certainty of things to come is oneof those truths which are not easily apprehended. The difficulty seems to arise/' says the Bishop of St. Asaph, " from a habit that we have of mea- suring all intellectual powers by the standard of human intellect. There is nothing in thenatureof certainty, abstractly considered, to connect it with past time or with the present, more than with the future ;but human knowledge extends in so small a degree to future things, that scarce any thing becomes certain to us till it is come teaching 155 teaching the way of salvation by means which were amenable to the capacity of all. Regenera- tion through grace, repentance through faith, re- to pass, and therefore we are apt to imagine that things acquire their certainty from their accomplishment. But this is gross fallacy. The proof of an event to us always depends either up- on the testimony of others or the evidence of our own senses ; but the certainty of events in themselves arises from their natural connexion with their proper causes. Hence to that great Being who knows things not by testimony, not by sense, but by their causes ; as being himself the first cause, the source of power and activity to all other causes; to Him everything that shall ever be, is at all times infinitely more certain than any thing either past or present can be to any existing being, and some of those ne- cessary truths which are evidenced to every man, not by his bodily senses, but by that internal perception which seems to be the first act of created intellect. This certainty, however, is to be carefully distinguished from a true necessity inherent in the nature of the thing. A thing is necessary when the idea of existence is included in the idea of the thing as an inseparable part of it. Thus, God is necessary; the mind cannot think of him at all without thinking of him as existent. The very notion and name of an event excludes this necessity, which belongs only to things uncaused. The events of the created universe are certain, because sufficient causes do, not because they must, act to their production. God knows this certainty, because he knows the action of all these causes, inasmuch as he himself begins it, and perfectly comprehends those mutual connexions between the things he hath created, which renders this a cause and that its effect. demption 156 demption by the atonement which he made of himself, in order that through its efficacy all that believed might inherit life eternal. To the philosophers of those days, and more especially to the Greeks, he pointed out the in- sufficiency of human reason for the attainment of divine knowledge: he told them to banish from their minds the prejudices of their educa- tion ; and to receive his doctrine like little chil- dren in simplicity and in truth. The promulgation of a doctrine such as that, and which was to spread throughout the whole world, appeared so repug- nant to the notion of the philosophy of those to whom it was addressed that it could not be credit- ed. To the Jews, who expected a Messiah in all earthly grandeur, and not a victim to be sacri- ficed, it was " a stumbling block ;" to the Greeks -who sought for eternity through the energy of reason, it was to them foolishness ; neither the Jews or the Greeks comprehended how mi- nisters (as the instruments who w r ere to be em- ployed to preach this new religion) taken from the lowest ranks of society could be qua- lified 157 lifted for such an office, fishermen, tent makers, and our Saviour himself was afterwards by them called the carpenter's son. It never entered into their imagination that the weakness of the means were employed in order to shew that the divinity of the dispensation could not come from them but from God ; and they never could conceive that God would chuse " the foolish things of this world to confound the wise, and the weak things of this world to confound the things that are mighty." Whatever affinity may be supposed to exist between the Platonic philosophy and the Chris- tian dispensation, the one differs from the other in points the most essential ; whilst the former requires for its apprehension an intellect the most gigantic, study and application the most intense, learning and knowledge the most pro- found ; the latter, on the contrary, by means of that grace which the Almighty has vouchsafed to bestow on those who in sincerity and in truth seek for it, produces on the mind an immediate capacity of receiving the truths of the gospel. The 158 The former therefore can only form the wisdom of the few, the latter of the multitude, and con- stitutes the hope and the consolation of the low as of the high, of the ignorant as of the learned ; if it were otherwise, mankind in general might have cause to arraign the bounty of the Almigh- ty, and complain of the unequal distribution of his favours ; a dispensation which by him was intended to be a rule of action to man, in order that he might obtain a knowledge of his Maker, it became a matter of justice that it should be amenable to the capacities of mankind in gene- ral. Grace therefore does to all, what philoso- phy alone is unable to effect upon the individual ; not by philosophy or vain conceit, but by puri- fying the soul and qualifying it to receive the influence of the holy spirit. These attributes can no more be apprehended, by matter in gene- ral, which is destitute of life, than by \egeU ables, or by brutes in particular ; by veget- ables which possess vitality without sensi- bility, or by brutes who have sensibility with- out intellect. The brute himself, no more than man t who leads the life of a brute, whose whole thoughts 159 thoughts and actions are directed to the gratifi- cation of his senses, and whose senses are never gratified untill they are surfeited, can never in that degraded state obtain any perception of spiritual things, more than those amongst us who believe that there subsists within them no other power than what arises from the mere matter of which they are composed ; the one can no more have communion with the other, than the most ignorant and uneducated amongst the sons of men is able to understand the highest branches of human knowledge ; to obtain, for example, a perfect knowledge of sublime geometry, al- though totally ignorant of lines and figures; of all languages, without possessing any appre- hension of sound ; and of all sciences without any perception whatever of the truths or prin- ciples on which they are founded. Between the lowest degrees of instinct and of sense, the offspring of animal existence and the mind of man, there can be no understanding, because there is no analogy between them ; the most irrational animal is no more able to appre- hend 160 hend the knowledge of the most rational man ; than the most rational man imitate the instinct of the most irrational brute; the cause lays in the ignorance of the one and the wisdom of the other. No correspondence whatever can sub- sist between beings whose natures are separat- ed by a chasm so widely different. It is with a view of adapting our meaning to the level of the understanding of the brute by which that information is to be received, that in our intercourse with animals, we converse with them in a silly unmeaning manner, because to them a wise and intelligent conversation would be unintelligible and foolish. Children therefore or men who act like children, have animals more immediately under controul, than the philoso- gopher who is replete with wisdom and know- ledge. If the ordinary powers of the human mind are so superior, as they unquestionably are, to those of the most rational animals, by what an immeasurable distance must the universal intel- lect of Almighty God be separated from the mind 161 mind of man — the creator from the creature, the infinite being from the being which is finite; the most perfect intellection which proceeds from the energy of the purest intellect is as the dust of the earth, when it is compared to the divine mind of the Almighty. The clod of earth on which we stand, and the uttermost part of the heavens is not a span long, in the relation which man bears to God. If God therefore had not manifested some portion of his attributes, by means which are on a level to the capacity of the human race, man must for ever have been ignorant of his maker. He therefore " who at sundry times, and in divers manners, hath spoken unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these latter days spoken unto us by his Son/' made of the same materials as ourselves, born of a woman, obnoxious to human wants, and liable to the same dangers. As it must ever be considered, that in a christian country the people should have a proper notion M of 162 of Christianity, I shall abstract an analysis from a sermon on the incarnation, preached in this parish on Christmas day, twenty seven years ago^ by Dr. Horsley, the rector, and which puts this subject in the clearest light:— " It is not as the birth day of a prophet, that this day is sanctified, but as the anniversary of that great event, which had been announced by the whole succession of prophets from the beginning of the world, and on which the predictions concerning the manner of the Messiah's advent found their literal and com- plete accomplishment: in which the miraculous conception makes so principal a part ; it makes the foundation of the whole distinction between the character of Christ in the condition of a man, and that of any other prophet. Had the conception of Jesus been in the natural way, had he been the fruit of Mary's marriage with her husband, his intercourse with the Deity might have been of no other kind than the nature of any other man might have equally admitted; an intercourse which the prophets enjoyed when their minds were enlightened by the ex- traordinary influence of the holy spirit: the influence might have been greater in degree, but it must have been the same in kind. The holy scriptures speak in a very different language ; they tell us, that the same God who spoke in times past by the prophets, hath in these latter 'days spoken unto us by his Son; evidently establishing a distinction of Christianity from preced- ing 163 ing revelations, upon a distinction between the two characters of a Prophet of God, and of God's Son ; between Moses himself, with whom Jehovah conversed face to face, and Jesus himself; the former bears to the latter the relation of a servant to a son ; but least this superiority should be mistaken for a superiority of office on the side of the Son, we are told that the Son is *\ higher than the angels, being the effulgence of God's glory, the ex- press image of his person ; the God, whose throne is for ever and ever, the sceptre of whose kingdom is a sceptre of righteousness." Had Christ been a mere prophet, to have believed in Christ had been the same thing as to believe in John the Baptist; the mes- sages indeed announced on the part of God by Christ, and by John the Baptist, might have been different, and the importance of the different messages unequal, but the principle of belief in either must have been the same. The intercourse which Christ as a man held with God, was different in kind from that which the greatest of the prophets ever had enjoyed; and this could only have been produced by the eternal word, who was in the beginning with God, and was God ; having so joined himself to the holy thing which was formed in Mary's womb,* that the two * Although revelation is the authority to which we should ap- peal for divine knowledge, we are nevertheless not interdicted the privilege of endeavouring to search for it -through aid of human means, provided those means lead to a conformity with, not to an opposition of holy writ; so far however from Revela- tion being in contradiction to philosophy, true philosophy con- M 2 164 natures, from the commencement of the Virgin's conception, made one person. Between God and any living being, having a distinct personality of his own, separate from the Godhead, no other communion could obtain, than what should consist in the action of the Divine Spirit upon the faculties of the separate sists in confirming the truth of revelation. The revelation which declared that ** in the beginning was the word, and the word was With God, and the word was God, the same was in the beginning with God, and that the word was made flesh and dwelt among us, &c. &c." so far from being inconceivable to human appre- hension, appears to me as easy to comprehend as any part of the creation. It has been the especial object which I have had in view, so far as I have gone, to prove that all the phenomena which take place in the universe, are effects only of producing causes; that these effects are ends, of which there of necessity must have been a beginning; that the power which was from the beginning is the cause to which the ultimate effect is to be referred, (e. g.) Action is the effect, of which organization is the cause; organization is the effect of which the principle of life is the cause; thinking is an effect of which the thinking principle is the cause; all the children of any one family are ends of which their parents are the beginning; these parents are the offspring of former parents, the succession therefore may be traced of animals and of vegetables to first parents; to first pa- rents which did not produce themselves, but which were pro- duced by some other being : I say some other being, because there is not any thing, save the one First and Universal Cause, which can be the cause of itself. Admitting therefore that Adam and Eve were the first parents of the human species, it must follow, that as no created thing can be the cause of itself, a time must have been, when the first vegetables were creat- ed without seed, the first animals without intercourse: the of- 165 person, as was enjoined by the prophets ; but Jesus according to the primitive doctrine, was so united to the ever living word, that the very existence of the man consisted in this union. We find in scripture the characteristic properties of both na- tures, the bumau and the divine, ascribed to the same person. ganization and action of these bodies are nothing more than the manifestation of the principles or causes by which they were produced; these principles must therefore have existed in the divine mind prior to their evolution, in the same manner as the living principles both of vegetables and of animals, before or- ganization and action ; these principles became manifested by th* power which they possess of acting on the matter which has the aptitude to be acted upon by them; the vegetable seed by vegetable life; animal ova by animal life; the brain by intell- ectual life. How much less difficult, is it not, to conceive, that the Divine Being, he who was the immediate progeny of the Father, -(and who formed with him one being, as the matter of light and the sun form one whole), might be received into the seed of the woman, as had been foretold by the ancient prophets; without the aid of those ordinary means which are found necessary in some of the lowest classes of animals. It willed the Son of God to chuse the human species to constitute the instrument of his power, because it was to the human species to which he manifested himself, and for the salvation of which he came down from heaven. Had his dispensation been intended for brutes or for vegetables, it is very probable that he would have come into the world in the body of a brute or of a vegetable; but being intended for the human race, in order that it might be adapted to the nature of the beings by which it was to be received; he came in a human form independently of human means, of the *eed of the woman without masculine cooperation. May 31 3 166 We read of Jesus, that he suffered from hunger and from fatigue; that he wept for grief, and was distressed with fear ; that he was obnoxious to all the errors of humanity, except the propensity to sin. John x. vii. And that we may in some manner understand how infirmity and perfection should thus exist in the same per-? son, we are told by St. John, that the " word was made flesh." A man conceived in the ordinary way would have derived the principles of his existence from the mere physical powers of generation; but the union with the divine nature could not have been the principle of an existence physically derived from — ^ > — — 1 /fe»yve not be permitted to suppose that the whole visible world ^ exhibits nothing more than so many passing pictures, of which the principles are the prototypes or exemplers, and that it is through the participation of them which matter has acquir- ed, that it may be said to have obtained a semblance of im? mortality. May we not be allowed to credit those speculative men which in times of old have told us, that it is in these comprehensive and permanent principles (or forms, as they have been called), that the Deity views at once without looking abroad, all possible productions, both present, past, and future ; that this great and Stupendous view is but a view of himself; where all things lie envelloped in their principles or exemplers, as being essential to the fulness of his universal intellect] n: if such be the case the axiom which is so applicable to the materialist, Nil est in intellectu quod non prius fuit in sensu, that there subsists nothing in intellect which did not before subsist in sense, must be reversed, but we ought rather to say, Nil est in sensu quod non prius fuit in intel- lectu, that nothing exists in sense which did not pre-exist in, intellect. Adam, and that intimate union of God and man in the Re- deemer's person had been a physical impossibility. " By the Redeemer's offering of himself as an expiatory sacri* fee, it was necessary that the manner of his conception should be such, that he should in no degree partake of the natural pol- lution of the fallen race, whose guilt he came to atone, nor be included in the general condemnation of Adam's progeny. u In Adam all die,* and for many lives thus forfeited a single life, itself a forfeit, had been no ransom, not only the progeny but the progenitor, every one sprung from the loins of Adam, is a debtor to divine justice, and incapable of becoming a mediator for his brethren. " In many things," we offend all; " if we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. And if any man sin we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous, and he is a propitiation for our sins." The condemnation and the iniquity of Adam's progeny were univer- sal. To reverse the universal sentence, and to purge the uni- versal corruption, a redeemer was to be found pure, of every stain of inbred and contracted guilt. And since every person pro- duced in the natural way could not but be of the contaminated race; the purity requisite to the efficacy of the Redeemer's atone- ment, made it necessary that the manner of his conception should be supernatural : the miraculous conception once admitted, naturally brings after it the great doctrines of the atonement and tne incarnation. The miraculous conception of our Lord im- plies some higher purpose of his coming than the mere business of a teacher. Such business might have been performed by a m 4 mere 168 mere man, enlightened with the prophetic spirit. Had teach- ing therefore been the sole purpose of our Saviour's coming, a mere man might have done the whole business, and the super- natural conception had been an unnecessary miracle. He there- fore who came in this miraculous way, came upon some higher business, to which a mere man wa9 unequal. He came to be made a sin offering for us, " that we might be made the righte- ousness of God in him." So close therefore is the connection of this extraordinary fact with the cardinal doctrines of the gospel, that it may be justly deemed a ne- cessary branch of the scheme of redemption. Although it is greatly to be deplored, that a large proportion of the world continues depriv- ed of the benefit of the christian dispensation, there are few people congregated together into one society, who are destitute of religion — of a belief, that there exists some being superior to themselves, and who consequently becomes the object of their adoration and worship : the very act of humiliation which they offer consti- tutes them religious beings ; whether the object of their adoration be symbolized by the sun, or by the 169 the moon, by a stock or a stone. It is by the par- ticular doctrines which particular religions en- force, that men are directed to particular modes of worship, and from whence the moral conduct of the individual takes his bend. It is the especial object of the christian dis- pensation to teach man to have a knowledge of himself, in order that he may know what he real- ly is : that although he possesses within himself a soul, immortal and divine, that this divine na- ture is nevertheless full of corrupt affections from the depravity of the animal constitution, by which it is denied ; that he is less disposed to ac- quire the perfection of the one, than to indulge the impulse of the other; that he is by nature born in sin, and the child of wrath ; that instead of resisting the allurements of passion and of vice, he is prone to yield to their influence; in- stead of resisting like the oak of the forest to the hurricane force by which he is assailed, he bends to temptation like the willow to the air; and that he is incapable of becoming accept- able to the Almighty by his own works. Notwithstanding 170 Notwithstanding the fallen condition of man, he is not left altogether destitute of attaining the end for which he is designed : if he employs the means, they are always within his reach ; in order however that regeneration from sin should be obtained, it is absolutely necessary that he should give up the ".old man," " be born again" " live in newness of life" and in the simplicity of a child follow the means of salvation which are proclaimed in the gospel. By constant watchfulness and humility, by abstraction from passion and from sense, by self- examination and repentance, by imploring be- fore the throne of grace, aid of the Holy Spirit, man attains that peace of mind which surpasseth all understanding; that assimilation of soul with the divine nature, which enables him to com- mune with his God, and have his redemption from sin secured through the efficacy of his Saviour's atonement. It is the efficacy of his faith in this atonement which enables him to triumph over indigence and oppression / 171 oppression, and rise in full vigour when appetite is no more; to smooth the brow of care and dispel the gloom of despondency, sweeten the bitterness of grief, and lull agony to rest. Religion ought there- fore to constitute the base of every national establishment, and be the rock which the whole nation as one man ought to grasp. It ought to form the main spring of his actions, the beginning, the middle, and the end of his pursuits; and it is humbly hoped that although the glad tidings of salvation have been confined to particular people, the efficiency of the at- tonement will extend to all nations and kindreds of the world. It is greatly to be deplored that in a christian country like this, the same errors frequently are found to exist in the principles and ends of the christian religion, as exist in different branches of philosophy ; that instead of making religion the basis of morality, morality is made the sum total of all religion. This appears to Jiave been the error of Mr. Pope, who although a good 172 a good poet was a bad divine; he contended that morality was the base and sum of all religion. " For modes of faith let graceless zealots fight, " He can't be wrong whose life is in the right." So far from this position being true it is totally false, and ought to be reversed; the poetry must be made bad to have the divinity made good : — u For modes of faith let graceless zealots fight, " He can't be right whose faith is in the wrong."* The truth of this position will evidently appear, if religion and morality are properly denned. Religion in the practical part is a studious con- formity of our actions, our wills, and our appe- tites, to the revealed will of God, in pure regard to the divine authority, and to the relation in which we stand to God, as discovered to us by revelation. On the contrary, morality is a con^ formation of our actions to the relation in which we stand to each other in civil society. So that although religion includes within its operation * See the Biahop of St. David's Charge to his Diocese. every 173 every branch of morality, morality falls very short of attaining the duties of religion ; it nei- ther reaches the secrets meditation of the mind, nor the silent desires of the heart ; it neither imposes restraint upon the sensuality of the imagination, nor the private prurience of the ap- petite. Morality does not say, Thou shalt not covet, thou shalt love thine enemies, thou shalt bless them that curse thee, do good to them that persecute; neither does it enjoin the forgiveness of injuries, or the giving of alms to the poor. The highest principle in morals is a just regard only to the rights of each other in civil society. The first principle in religion, on the contrary is the love of God ; that is to say, in regard to the relation which we bear to him, as is made known to us by revelation. A religious man, strictly so called, does good by design and evil by chance; although his benevolence may be bestowed on unworthy objects, the goodness of his motive absolves him from any error they may cause. On the contrary, the mere moral man, having no higher motives than mere personal gratifica- tion, the moral works he perforins are conse- quently 174 quently irreligious, not contrary to religion, but without it : he therefore does good by chance, and if he commits evil, the selfishness of his mo- tive precludes all charitable excuse, because he does it by design. It is therefore through faith in revelation, and which, in its beginning, is unquestionably a distinct gift of God, that we \ become religiously moral, have the fear of God constantly before our eyes, and conform our actions to the precepts of revelation. Faith constitutes the means, morality is the end. To suppose practice separable from faith, is to say that the end is attainable without the means; or finally, to affirm that faith can exist without practice, is to suppose that a producing cause can exist without producing an effect. It is by the ef- ficacy of this faith that the distinction between the philosopher and the idiot is abolished, and by which " all that believe are saved," corrup- tion is buried in incorruption, mortality in immor- tality, and the soul finds eternal rest after the earthly tabernacle in which it is contained is dissolved.* CHAP. CHAPTER VII. ON THE PHYSIOLOGY OF LIFE, AFTER having briefly but imperfectly de- tailed the ends for which it appears the different classes of animated beings were created, the subject would naturally lead me to describe the means through the agency of which those ends are accomplished. It is greatly to be deplored, that in the very onset of the enquiry physiolo- gists are at variance ; although all must admit the necessity of life, of that poiver by whose energy different species of matter are assimilated to 176 to one kind, a living system organized and form- ed y and the various parts of which it is composed protected and preserved from decomposition and decay, none agree in opinion with respect to its nature; the generality of physiologists either profess their total ignorance of the subject, or else ascribe it to matter which is either dead or common. To the late Mr. John Hun- ter the greatest merit is due for the advances which he made to tear away the veil of igno- rance and of error, in which even in his time physiology was involved ; his discerning mind perceived the distinction which exists between chemical and vital action, as well as between vitality and organization ; he considered that the organization was an effect of which life was the cause — that life was superadded to matter as magnetism is to iron. The dawn of light, however, which began to illuminate physiology, whilst Mr. Hunter was alive to give autho- rity to his opinions, became immediately obscur- ed after his death ; instead of succeeding to estab- lish the paramount predominant power of life, as the cause from which all the phenomena of living 177 living action proceed, they are at this time for the most part referred to the agency of chemical and mechanical means, and the science of phy- sicfis erroneously employed to explain that of physiology. By many it is supposed that the principle of life resides in oxygen gas, and which has con- sequently been called vital air. Oxygen 'gas is formed by and obtained from the oxydes of metals, and of semi-metals, more especial- ly of minium and manganeeze, and is con- stantly excreted as deleterious and foreign from the vegetable kingdom in general. It is this particular air, this oxygenous matter, which ve- getables in the day time are perpetually dis- charging from the whole external surface of their foliage as urinous and dead, and which these pure defecated philosophers conceive consti- tutes the principle of life in which all power essentially resides, the immediate and proxi- mate cause of irritability in man ! !! n By 178 By another class the legitimate offspring of an unnatural parent, life is supposed to be a forced state, not an original principle; not an effect simply, but the effect of an effect. It is stated that certain substances called stimuli, — as bran- dy, water, food, &c. &c. act upon a certain some- thing, which according to the gypsey jargon of this school has been called excitability: that these exciting powers by acting on this excita- bility, produce an effect which is called excite- ment, and that excitement constitutes life, and is the proximate cause of it,— the source of life in- deed, at its termination, — it makes life to begin out of the body, and to end in it, instead of be- ginning in it and ending out of it. In this hy- pothesis life is in fact forced into existence by the united action of the stimuli and the excitabili- ty together, a tertiumquid is formed, in the same manner as the motion of a spinning top by the action of a whip upon it. Great as these errors may be considered, they are in my opinion as a feather in the balance, when compared to the prevailing practice of referring to the agency of •.hnnical means the various phenomena which are 1?9 are carried on in the living system ; if the uniform rnity of effect which ensues from chemical com* binationis contrasted with the diversity of quality which different kinds of food undergo by the di- gestive power of different animals ; vve must ne- cessarily be Jed to conclude that the process of digestion does not proceed from a chemical cause. If it arose from a chemical cause, the change which the food sustained, by the mutual action between the parts would be regular and uniform, and the result, instead of being always the same, would be generally different. It would constantly vary in its properties according to the specific nature of the substances out of which it was made. The change itself would be con- stant and definite, and not liable to the remission and variation which we witness during the process of digestion. It is therefore legitimate to conclude that the process of digestion, by means of which differ- ent kinds of food are assimilated to one and the same species, is not a chemical but a living act, and that the efficient cause of this commutation N 2 does 180 does not arise from any active or chemical pro- perty which in the food inheres; but that it pro- ceeds from the power of the organ alone in which it is received, and by whose energy the new arrangements of the parts are formed. This assimilating power pervades the whole range of animated existence. It is in es- sence the same in animals as it is in vege- tables, however diversified the construction of the organs may be by which the effect is pro- duced : all these organs are designed to reduce different substances to one kind, in order that this one substance may be in harmony with the system at large, and fitted to be acted upon by the particular power of the different organs into various forms. When the assimilating organs therefore perform their functions with force and with efficacy; they possess the power of chang- ing and of destroying the sensible and chemical qualities of the substance they receive; they not only possess the power to act, but to resist ac- tion; to change things external to themselves without 131 withoutbeing changed by external things ; to act upon them instead of being converted by them. The matter therefore which every living sys- tem receives for its nourishment and support, can only arise out of its aptitude, and its aptitude can only proceed from its imbecillity and weak- ness, from its state of disorganization and depri- vation total and complete. It is whilst it subsists in this weak and destitute condition, with relation to the power of a living system, that I say mat- ter is a mere tabula rasa — in all its parts a chaos, of power and intelligence altogether void, as imbecil and inert as the shoe without the foot, or as the musical instrument without the art or power of the musician: it bears the same relation of tvcakness to the poiver of the organs, as the uncoloured paper on which I am now writing does to the power of my hand, or as the block does to the statue. If the block were already chiselled into a statue, the prior existence of that statue would render the marble whilst in that figured condition unfit for the art of the sta- tuary, but being a plain surface alone, it becomes n 3 a fit 182 a fit recipient for the figures which the artist intends to engrave. That this is the relation which actually sub- sists of power and of weakness, between the re- ceiver and the thing received, between the or- gans and the food ; is proved by examining the converse of the proposition. If the food which every living system receives for its nourishment , and support, acted by virtue of its chemical or its sensible qualities, whether of aggregation or configuration; whether of colour or flavor ; these qualities would constantly resist the powers of the organs, and would oppose the change which the matter by them was designed to undergo. Instead of vegetable and animal matter being converted into chyle; fermentation and putre* faction would invariably take place; if solid sub- stances had been taken in for food, those sub* stances would obey the order of their affinities in the system itself as they are prone to do out of it; a chemical union between the parts would take place, and compound salts be formed; and finally, if they retained any active or corrosive power 183 power, they would enter into an union with the organ itself, a caustic effect would be produced, and a consequent decomposition of it would en- sue; or if the matter received acted by virtue of its configuration, it would irritate and destroy, iaesion and destruction be the consequence. If it possessed any permanent power of solidity or fluidity; the one could not by the organ be ren- dered fluid, more than the other rendered gela- tinous or solid, and in neither case could it ul- timately be fashioned or formed into the differ- ent and varied parts for which it was especially designed. The same reasoning equally applies to its attributes of colour and of flavour also: if any particular colour in the food permenantly inhe- red, that colour would be constantly retailed; by being retained it would be always imparted to the blood, and the complexion instead of being different in the individual of every species would be invariably the same. This is proved when substances are introduced for food, whose sen sible properties cannot be altogether obliterat n 4 ed, 184 eel. Hence it is that madder imparts a red, tuv«- meric a yellow colour, to the system at large. No proof indeed is more strong of the disor- ganization total and complete, which the most minute particles of matter in general undergo by the process of digestion, than the loss of flavour and of colour which they suffer ; the most odorous and sapid are rendered inodorous and tasteless, the most coloured (as far as it is pos- sible) colourless; retaining no quality what- ever, bulk alone excepted. The relation which subsists between the alimen- tary matter from without and the digestive organs within, is precisely the same in kind as that which subsists between the blood and the vari- ous parts to which it is conveyed; whilst the digestive organs unify and assimilate different species of matter to one and the same kind, and which subsists in the form of blood, the dif- ferent secretory organs on the contrary have the power to convert this blood into fluids and solids, in their nature totally different, as we behold in the various secreted fluids that are produced 185 produced from the blood of the same animal and the medulla of the same plants. Blood bears the same relation to the power which the organs severally possess, as brick and mortar do to the architect or to the artist by whom a building* is erected. It has no more the power to convert itself into organization or form than brick and mortar have of themselves the power to erect a * building. If it possessed any power of action within itself, by virtue of the sensible properties it contains, it would resist the action of the organs to which it was applied, it would act upon them instead of being changed and con- verted by them : if it had the power of convert- ing itself by itself either into different organs or into different fluids, the previous existence of those organs would be unnecessary, since the process of conversion and of secretion would take place without their influence. We might as well suppose that a building can be erected without hands and designed without a designer; it in fact is to suppose an effect to be produced without a producing cause; or the supposition equally 186 equally absurd and false, that the effect and the cause are inherent in one and the same subject. By virtue of its passivity the capacity of blood arises not only of being moved but of being changed and organized; it has the capacity of being moved without having any power of mov- ing itself, following without resisting the im- pulse it receives from the vessels in which it is contained. It has the capacity of being changed by the power of the part in which it is deposited ; yield- ing without resisting, as the softened and adapt- ed wax to the force of the impression engraved on a seal. It bears the same relation to the organs as air does to sound ; if the air expired from the lungs inherently possessed any particular sound, that particular sound would constantly manifest it- self; but air being destitute of all sound, retains the capacity alone of being expanded and com- pressed ; it thereby becomes fitted to be acted upon 187 upon by the organs of speech, and through their power it is modulated and harmonized, and language ultimately produced. It is with a view of preserving this aptitude in the blood of animals, and to prevent the sen* sible qualities which the coarser parts contain, from being employed, or exerting any influ- ence upon the organs, that we behold the design and end for the exhalent termination of arteries into capillary tubes, by means of which a me- chanical cause exists to prevent a mechanical effect. If it were not for this mode of construc- tion; if the terminated diameter of the exhalent arteries were large instead of small, not only the more tenuous, but the more globular parts of the blood would be permitted to flow through ; those parts of the whole would flow through which possess quantity with colour and figure ; quality without aptitude, that would act upon the organs instead of retaining the fitness alone to be acted upon by them. A gradual diminution in the size of the secretory vessels exists, in order that the fluid which they exhale may answer in the best 188 best possible manner the end for which it is de- signed; this fluid is therefore tasteless and in- odorous, colourless and tenuous. So little is known at this time of the nature of blood, that with few exceptions, the generali- ty of physiologists absolutely deny to it the at- tributes of vitality, — of vitality to that important matter from which every part of the living sys- tem is formed, which supplies the wants, and which restores the w r aste that different parts suffer ; and Mr. J. Bell, who must be consider- ed high authority, calls the vitality of the blood " the most monstrous of all absurdities." The vitality of the blood is an opinion almost as ancient as the Mosaic account of the creation. The sacred writings tell us, that " the life is in the blood," that is to say that the life of the ani- mal or of the vegetable is in the blood, in com- mon with the other parts of the body; not sepa- rate and distinct from it, but co-existing and connate with it. That the blood is alive was so considered by Servetus, two hundred and fifty years ago, (it made one of the charges pre- ferred 189 ferred against him before he was brought to the stake), as well as by our illustrious countrymen Hervey and Hunter. It is greatly to be deplor- ed, for the cause of science, that Mr. Hunter's active and comprehensive mind should have been destitute of those collateral branches of knowledge which are intimately connected with the science of physiology : he saw truth, but he saw it at an unapproachable distance, he saw it in a fog, he saw it through a glass dark- ly. Although Mr. Hunter revived the explod- ed doctrine of the vitality of the blood, he ne- vertheless supposed that this vitality was as it were separated from the other parts of the sys- tem ; that the blood had a life, sui generis, or as he termed it, that the blood was an animal with- in an animal ; imperium in imperio ; insomuch /i^fiHt possessed a sort of animation or power of action within itself similar to muscular con- traction ; that it was by virtue of this power that bones were formed and renewed, and the various processes of secretion and of growth carried on ; that in fact all the phenomena which are W6 are produced by it proceeded from powers inhe- rent in it, These false assumptions grubed up the road which he himself had paved of discovering the relation which the blood bears to the organs, and at once blasted the fair prospect which he had opened to our view, of seeing the nature and design of secretion; instead of which the process of secretion, so important and exten- sive in the living system, is acknowledged by all to be involved in utter darkness. Our ignorance of secretion appears to me itl a great measure to arise from mistaking the re- lation which the blood bears to the organs by the energy of which it is acted upon and chang- ed; instead of considering blood as the passive recipient*, as the subject matter to be acted up- on, not only by the vessel in which it is con- tained, but by the organ in which it is deposit- ed ; it is to the stimulus of the blood, more than to its aptitude to be acted upon by the organs to which the changes which it undergoes are to be referred* 191 referred. If blood possessed any power of action within itself, it would resist the action of the organs to which it was applied ; it would act up- on them, instead of being* changed and converted 2^ them ; it is moved without the power of moving itself; it is propelled without resisting, and fol- lows the impulse it receives from the power of the vessels in which it is contained, not accord- ing to the principles by which fluids are moved in hydraulic machines, but by powers altogether different from them. The relation which exists between the blood and the vessel is precisely the same in kind as subsists between the glands and the blood; whilst the power of the one is similar to the figures engraved in a seal, the other resembles the softened and adapted wax which is to re- ceive the impression. It is by the energy of the former and aptitude in the latter, that the vari- ous processes of secretion and nutrition are car- ried on. Instead of supposing that the changes which are produced on the blood arise from the agency of the glands, or of the part in which it is 192 is deposited, the change for the most part is re- ferred to the power of the blood upon the gland, the act is stated to he a chemical rather than a livin gone, and the aggregating principles of physiology have been abandoned to the decom- posing powers of chemistry : every solid and every fluid have in consequence been analysed with the utmost accurac3 r , and from bodies whose elements were found to be the same, ef- fects which are altogether different are attempt- ed to be explained. I shall therefore proceed to take a cursory review of these different bodies in order to point out how little is known about them at this time. With respect to saliva, instead of considering it as an auxiliary to the teeth in acting upon the food; it is for the most part viewed as a mere mucous fluid destined to lubricate the surface of the mouth. The saliva however to me appears to have an higher office to fulfil ; whilst the food is broken down with respect to mass by the mechanical action of the teeth, the saliva is destined to assist them in comminut- ing 193 . ing those parts into smaller particles, it tends to eliminate the specific and chemical qualities which the food contains, it bereaves acids of their acidity, alcalis of their acrimony, and to a certain and limited extent blunts the asperity of both, rendering the different articles of food bland and mild, as a preparatory step to the action in the stomach which the food is to un- dergo. The various facts which were produced by Mr. Hunter, and which have been multiplied without end by others, prove in a manner the most decisive that the change which the food undergoes in the stomach from a dead to a living state, is a living not a chemical act ; although all agree that the gastric juice is the agent by the energy of which the process is accomplish- ed; with the exception of a few, the effect is referred to a chemical, not to a living cause: with as much rationality might we refer to death the cause of life; to organic action, the source of organization ; or assert that the fceculent matter in the rectum is the seat of chylfication. It is o scarcely 194 scarcely necessary for me to expatiate on the folly of these opinions, they go to revive the ex- ploded doctrine of M c Bride, that digestion is a process of fermentation and putrifaction, and that the same means are employed in the ani- mated system to bring dead matter into a living state, as those by which living matter is decom- posed and reduced to one dead and putrid. The gastric juice, like the other fluids, has been analysed also, but insead of manifesting any chemical properties to which its power can be referred, it has been found to be destitute of them; it is neither acid nor alcalescent, but per- fectly insipid and inoffensive. Is it, I would ask, reasonable to assert that a fluid such as this, which appears to be destitute of all che- mical quality whatever, nevertheless acts by che- mical power? The same errors exist respecting the agency of the means by which a separation of the chy- lous from the feculent parts of the chyme is ef- fected, after it has passed from the stomach in- to the intestinal canal ; although the first por- tion of the canal is evidently constructed with a view 195 view to retard the passage of the chyme through it, it is generally believed that the bile which the liver secrets is merely intended to accelerate its expulsion. It is far otherwise, the internal surface of the canal is increased to a very consider- able extent by means of a number of ridges or folds, which at first are nearly concentric to each other but which gradually acquire a diago- nal direction ; since then the alimentary canal is constructed with a view to retard the motion of the food through the first part of its course ; it is most unreasonable to suppose that the real and direct intention of the hepatic system is to hasten its expulsion; if this were the case, in- stead of harmony, there would be perpetual warfare between both : the retarding construc- tion of the intestines would always tend to prevent, what the bile was designed to accelerate, and the ductus communis, in such a case, instead of having its orificein the duodenum ought to have it in the rectum; those who can reconcile this war- fare of parts that are dependant upon each other, have very inadequate notions of the symmetry that pervades throughout the whole of the system o 2 and 196 and the harmony that exists between the parts of which it is composed. So far from suppos- ing that the primary use of bile is intended to defeat the end for which the intestinal (or the chylous canal as it ought more properly to be called), is so peculiarly constructed; I think it far more reasonable to conclude that it is in- tended to harmonize with it, and that the bile instead of acting by its resin and its alcali as an active purgative, is intended in the first in- stance to separate the chylous from the fcecu- lent parts of the chyme, producing a precipita- tion of the one, and afterwards assisting the ex- pulsion of the other, conformably to observations which have been made by experiments. With respect to the pancreas or sweetbread, although it secretes a fluid of a quality bland and mild, somewhat similar in its properties to saliva, and which probably co-operates in ac- complishing the same purpose as the bile from the liver; the specific determinate use to which this fluid subserves, continues to the best ex- perimentalist a perfect mystery. The 197 The same uncertainty prevails respecting the use of the spleen $ the well, known fact that it has been altogether absent in animals which in general have one, and that it has been extirpat- ed without producing any violent shock to the constitution, led to the supposition that it was of little or no use. Dr. Stukely, seventy years ago, in his Gulstonian Lecture, traced the con- nection which subsists between the spleen and the stomach, as well as between the other abdo- minal viscera, and from a very scientific mode of investigation was led to conclude that the spleen was designed to assist the stomach in the process of digestion; these opinions of Dr. Stukley, have since received some confirmation by experiments made by Dr. Haighton, the re- spectable lecturer on physiology at Guy's Hos- pital ; the doctor was led to conclude that when the stomach was full, the pressure which the spleen is made in consequence to undergo, not only prevents the passage of the blood through that organ, but that it actually does produce an increased accumulation in the vessels with which the stomach and the pancreas are suppli- o 3 ed 198 ed. Greatly as I respect Dr. Haighton's talents and industry, there are many "objections to his experiments upon this subject, and the fact that in some animals the situation of the stomach and the spleen are so remote that they cannot come in contact, may probably appear an in- superable objection to his hypothesis. Mr. Home, who holds the first rank in his profes sion, and who must be considered very high authority also, from different experiments which he made on dogs, is of opinion that the food from the stomach undergoes some change in the spleen, not through the medium of the ab- sorbent vessels, but by some unknown mode of communication : after tying the pyloric extre- mity of the stomach, and injecting into that or- gan infusions of madder and of rhubarb, and killing the animal, he found that the cells of the spleen, particularly at the great end of it were very large and distinct ; on macerating a portion of it in ten drachms of water, and testing it by an alcali, he found that it gave out a reddish brown colour in the center and no where else; a similar portion of the liver was treated in the same 199 same manner and an alkali was added to the strained liquor, but no such change in it was produced. I mention these opinions in order to show how little is known upon the subject. The same confusion exists with respect to the lacteal (or chilous) vessels ; those vessels which arising with open mouths from the folds of the intestines, absorb the chyle or digested aliment after it has been depurated from its feculent portions, and convey it to the mass of blood, in order that the waste which it undergoes may be restored. The mode by which the absorption is accomplished continues an object of disputa- tion ; instead of supposing that it is performed by a living power in the parts, as much as the suction of a leech or even of an infant at the breast ; by many it is considered an inanimate act, similar to the raising different fluids in narrow tubes, by what is called capillary attraction. Al- though the lacteal (chylous) resemble the lym- phatic vessels in the office of absorption, the substances on which they act are in their na- ture totally different ; whilst the former convey 3iU o 4 to 200 to the blood the nutritious matter which the stomach had assimilated ; the latter on the con- trary are designed to remove and carry away those parts of the system which are worn out, and which exist in a perishing and dying state ; the former maybe compared to cooks which con- stantly afford to the blood a supply, the other to scavengers who take away the dilapidated parts of the system. It is in obedience to the diversity in the end to which each system is subservient, that there exists a diversity of power between them at different periods of life; in in- fancy and youth, whilst the system is in a state of progression and growth the lacteals are large and the lymphatics comparatively small ; at the middle periods of life, when the system has at- tained the acme of perfection, both systems are as it were balanced; in old age, on the con trary, when emaciation and decrease takes place, the balance between them is altogether upset, and both scales are put into one; the lacteals become weaker and smaller, whilst the lymphatics on the contrary increase in magni- tude and strength. Instead of contemplating the 201 the action of these vessels with relation to the separate functions which they are designed to perform, both are generally confounded together, whilst the former carry materials to the blood to supply the waste which it suffers, the latter receives from the system the parts which are wasted, or which have accomplished the purpose for which they were enlarged ; in no organ is this office more striking than in the uterus. Before ges- tation the lymphatics of that organ are remark- ably small and thready, after parturition they im- mediately encrease in size, and have often been seen as large as the quill of a goose; it is through their agency that the different parts of the system that are either superfluous or dis- eased are removed ; diminishing the fabric of the whole by the parts which they absorb, and of* ten destroying the form itself; notwithstanding these avowed purposes for which the lymphatics are designed, the opinion which was first broach- ed by Mr. Hunter, soon after they were discover- ed, that they were the modellers of our frame continues 202 continues to be preserved; instead of modellers they are the scavengers of the system.* If I proceed to detail the opinions which are entertained respecting the function of the lungs, they will be found most erroneous and contra- dictory. Instead of considering the lungs, as I conceive they ought to be considered, as much organs of digestion as the stomach itself; the one acting upon and digesting particular kind* of air, as much as the other is known to do particular kinds of food, whilst the latter re- stores the waste which the blood sustains in point of quantity, the former meliorates it in point of quality, and by the united power of both it is preserved in a state fitted to answer the ends for which it is designed ; instead, however of sup- posing that the lungs act upon the air, it is sup- posed it is the air which acts upon the lungs, * The pig which had remained under the ruins of the cliff which fell in at Dover, for the period of five months, was re- duced in weight by the. activity of these vessels, for the most part, from eight scores to thirty six pound} that is he had lost in weight 124 pounds. and 203 and like the action of the food upon the stomach, that it is a chemical, not a living act. Instead of separating the functions of respira- tion in general, as they ought tobe,into inspiration by which air is received into the lungs — into digestion, by which particular portions of it are separated from the rest, and received into the blood for its melioration and support, and final- ly into expiration, by which the residuary and fceculent parts are expelied out of the system : the process of respiration, on the contrary, is confined to inspiration and expiration only. I shall not dwell upon the multitude of cruel ex- periments which have been made on cats and dogs, in order to ascertain the quality of the different materials which are received and ex- pelled : in spight of all the means which have been employed these chemical physiologists continue at variance, and have not yet settled whether oxygen air or caloric is absorbed, and from the late experiments made without the aid of torture, by two eminent chemists, Messrs. Allen and Pepys, upon this subject, they would seem 204 seem to disprove all the experiments that have been made before; they go to show that al- though much carbonic air is expired, little or nothing is taken in ; however high the authority certainly is, from whence this opinion has come. I nevertheless consider the actual change of colour and of consistence, from black and thick to red and liquid, which the blood undergoes as it passes from the pulmonary artery through the lungs to the pulmonary veins, is far more decisive than any chemical experiments per- formed on the air out of the body can disprove; that independently of what is expelled a con- siderable quantity of matter is neverthless re- ceived, the quality of which it is not worth a rush to ascertain ; the experiments made by Mr. Hunter, Dr. Goodwin, &c. &c. are decisive on this point. Equally at variance are physiologists with respect to the manner in which the matter act- ed upon by the lungs is conveyed into the blood : instead of deriving benefit from the analogy which different parts of the system afford, when we see 205 see the matter which is received, is conveyed by absorption from vessels which have the power of absorbing ; instead of supposing that the parts of the air which have been separated frorn the whole, are absorbed by the extremity of the pulmonary veins, as the nutritious matter which the placenta furnishes for the support of the foetus is unquestionably absorbed by the extre- mities of the umbilical veins, or as the chyle by the chylous (lacteal) vessels, it is generally supposed that the air forces its way into the blood by the most unnatural means, not through the medium of open orifices which are greedy to receive it, but through the solid and impeni- trable sides of the vessels themselves. A con- struction of vessels which would permit the access of air through would evidently admit the egress of it also ; the assertion has been disprov- ed by experiments which were made to support it ; the jugular veins of rabbits have been ex- posed and oxygen air by means of a blow pipe, has been directed upon it, without producing any sensible alteration on the blood that flowed through it; on removing, however, the external coat 206 coat of the vessel it was supposed that the co- lour of the blood then underwent some change, and became more florid than before : a false fact such as this, will not 1 trust give any weight to such an opinion. Although chemical physiologists have been undecided with respect to the quality of the matter which has been received from the lungs into the blood, they have been pretty unani- mous in opinion, that it was the source and the cause of animal heat. If such an hypothesis were true it must as a consequence follow that the temperature of the blood must be higher at the the point near which it is received than in the most remote parts from it; and that the blood on the left side of the heart ought, in that case, to be hotter than the blood on the right side of it : the fact however is precisely the reverse, the experiments made by Mr. A. Cooper (and there is no man more able or more to be de- pended upon), shew in a manner the most de- cisive that the blood on the right side of the heart, at the greatest possible distance from whence 207 whence the matter of heat is supposed to be re- ceived, was from two to three degrees hotter than the blood on the left side, the nearest point to the supposed source of heat; if the hypothesis therefore is admitted to be true we must also admit the absurdity, that a body is heated to a greater degree when situated at a great distance from a fire than when it is placed close to it. How the gaseous matter received from the lungs acts upon the blood, except by changing its colour and consistency, is as unknown at present as the operation of medicine upon the stomach. The causa operandi of medicine is altogether unknown, and the modus operandi is only acquired by experience obtained through the medium of observation and of accident; the best physician that exists can no more tell the cause why tartarized antimony has an emetic, or the sulphate of magnesia a cathartic effect, than the most ignorant nurse living ; much less (if total ignorance would admit of degrees), how specific* remedies produce specific effects in curing particular complaints : let it not there- fore 208 fore be arrogantly asserted that there is any science in pathology, or in the practice of medi- cine, it is absolute quackery.* Having run over the deplorable state of igno- rance which exists respecting the functions of those organs that are subservient to the pre- servation and support of the system, I shall now proceed to show that the same state of error and of ignorance exists respecting the nature of the actions of those organs, through the energy of * I wish however to be clearly understood ; I speak of the practice of medicine as a science, not as an art. The observa- tions and experience of intelligent and sensible men have been the means of employing the different remedies which relieve and cure different complaints, and the man who has the greatest ex- perience, and who has the best capacity to make observation on the progress of the different symptoms of the same disease, and to compare different diseases with each other is unquestionably the. man who is most likely to constitute the best physician. With respect to surgery there is perhaps no branch of art that has undergone within the last thirty years greater improvements not only with respect to the instruments employed, but in the mode of using them also; and the sufferings of mankind have in consequence been greatly mitigated ; these observations may in some degree apply to the art of midwifery also. which 209 Which the ends are obtained for which animat- ed beings were created; I mean the organs of motion and of fecundation, of ratiocination and of sensation* With respect to the cause of motion although the subject has occupied the attention of many ingenious and enquiring men at different times, we possess no other knowledge of this cause than that the muscles are the agents by which motion is produced ; but of the cause why we continue in the most profound ignorance. Having investigated the subject of fecunda- tion, the result of which I have detailed at large in my Physiology, as well as in two papers pub- lished in the MedicalJournal for the year 1799, I shall merely observe in this place, that the ob- ject which I had principally in view, was to shew thatthe ideas which were entertained on it by Dr. Haighton, and which have been published in the Philosophical Transactions, were altogether er- roneous ; that he had discarded and rejected all analogy whatever; and the evidence which is p furnished 210 furnished to us by vegetables, by fish, and by the amphibia, as well as other classes of animals; that instead of taking* the actual existence of a foetus, as constituting the only infallible test of animal impregnation; he had assumed the formation of a corpus luteum in the ovarium. I proved that the very facts which he had advanced were decisive in shewing that he had proceeded from false assumptions ; that in all those cases in which he divided the fallopian tube of one side and left the one on the opposite side perfect and undivided, that al- though there were corpora lutea in both ovaria; there were foetuses only in the perfect, but no traces whatever of a foetus in the mutilated side ; that although (Estrumhad producedan evolution of the ova in both ovaria,impregnation was appa- rent only in the perfect one. Notwithstanding these facts which he himself had obtained, he conclud- ed that the existence of corpora lutea was the test of impregnation ; and from this false fact and false assumption, he has proceeded to investi- gate the subject, and to make from them the most erroneous conclusions; he might with as much propriety have supposed that the ova of birds birds, which we see continually dropped from the ovarium without impregnation, are actually im- pregnated ; and that the corpus luteum which is in consequence formed, is the test of it, al- though certain evidence had existed that no union between the pairs had taken place, and where corpora lutea had been formed, but no im- pregnation whatever. The ignorance and error which exist respect- ing the functions which I have mentioned, are especially extended to those of sensation and of consciousness ; although the brain is the organ in which consciousness resides, we are totally ignorant of the manner by which its actions are displayed ; how it is that without being muscular in its fabric it is nevertheless the cause of muscular motion; how, though formed of parts which were originally destitute of sense and of reason, it nevertheless constitutes the instrument from which the principles of sense and of reason per- tually flow. Notwithstanding all analogy justifies the opinion that the brain is an organ of secretion, the fact has never been demons traced, and the most perfect ignorance exists at thi s time how this most p 2 important 212 important organ of the whole system acts, and what is its nature. This state of ignorance has been very candidly confessed by Sir Busic Har- wood, the present learned and respectable pro- fessor of anatomy at the university of Cam- bridge : — "When we dissect the brain," sayshe, "and ob- serve the different substances of which it is com- posed, and their different forms ; imagination as- suming the office of reason, would willingly assign a peculiar use to every part, and pronounce one to be the residence, or rather the instrument of memory ; another of abstraction, a third of vo- lition, &c. When a sensation is excited by the action of any substance upon the'body, we im- mediately perceive upon what part of the body the substance acts, where the impression be- gins ; and as the impression is conveyed by the nerves to the brain, it is conceivable that we might be so constituted as to perceive with the same facility in what part of the brain the im- pression ends. This, however, experience con- vinces tis, we are not able to determine. The skill 213 skill of the anatomist has demonstrated every process, explored every cavity, and would if possible have traced every filament of this in- explicable mass, of that wonderful aud anoma- lous organ placed on the doubtful confines of the material and spiritual worlds I nor have the physiologist or metaphysician been less eager to discover or to assign to each part its peculiar office; whatever maybe due to the former for accuracy, and to the latter for ingenuity and zeal, we must lament that little knowledge has resulted from their labours. At this advanced period of science, when almost every subject has been illuminated by the experiments, the deductions, and even by the conjectures of the learned, we are not able to proceed a single step beyond the fathers of medicine, who in the very infancy of our art pronounced this inscru- table mass of organized matter to be the foun- tain and the reservoir, the beginning and the end of the whole nervous system, where every idea originates, and to which every sensation is referred/' P a The 214 The same want of knowledge exists with respect to sensation, — that the nerves are the organs of sense as the muscles are of motion, comprehends all we know of their nature; but of the manner how impressions received are conveyed to the brain, in which the impression ends and consciousness begins ; and how voli- tion and motion are imparted to the different muscles of voluntary motion, — whether these ef- fects are accomplished through the medium of a subtle fluid which the nerves contain, as Sir Isaac Newton and others with great probability of truth have asserted, or according to the opi- nion of others by vibrations excited through nerves of a solid fabric, like thrills on a brass wire, is not only a matter of hypothesis, but is as unknown to the best physiologist, as it is to the rudest barbarian.* ■* The horrid cruelties which continue to be practised by the Galvanic fire, and other means, on the sciatic nerves of frogs, rather favour the former hypothesis ; the experiment once made has ascertained all that can be known from it, and the fact might therefore be mentioned, but certainly ought not to be re- peated as it is so often done, in order to produce a sort of stage What 215 What are the individual properties of which the different bodies are composed, which impressed upon the organs of sense excite the different sensa- tions, is a physical not a physiological question, and is more cognizable to the natural philosopher than to the physiologist. It is the province of the chemist to analize the materials of which the different kinds of food are composed, to ascertain the parts which consti- tute the difference by which one species of food is in its nature different from the rest; — beef from venison, madeira from claret. What are the constituent materials which flowing from different bodies excite on the olfactory sense, flavours so various and opposite, — to ascertain the quality of bodies through which impulses are propagated, and which excite on the audi- tory nerves the sensations of sound, — or why abed of roses and a bed of thorns, excite the sensa- tions of pleasure and of pain ; — to ascertain the effect, and to gratify ignorant curiosity. Little did Lord Bacon suppose that the system 6i induction which he introduced, would have been converted into a system of torture. p 4 nature 216 nature of the atmosphere in general, as well as of the different bodies which excite upon the nerves of sense the sensation of dryness and of moisture, of heat and of cold ; to separate the matter which excites the sensation of heat and of cold, from such as excites the sensation of colour; — to prove what fire is, as Mell as ice. It is the duty of the chemist to analize the materials which flowing from different bodies excite upon the eye the sensation of illumination in general, and of colour in particular ; not only to segregate a beam of light into rays, but to analize each ray into its constituent parts; to separate the matter of colour from the matter of light \ and finally to present the solar ray pure and unmixed as it subsists in its elemen- tary and uncombined state. Until ready and most satisfactory answers can be given to these points, I shall consider chemistry most defective and imperfect, undeserving the name of science, and merely ranking on a level with other arts.* • I purposely omit noticing the analysis of any part of the Jiving system, whether of animals or of vegetables; because che* The 217 The sensation on the surface of the body is ex* cited by the resistance which is opposed to the nerves situated under the skin, the nature and the design of which depend on the peculiarity in the arrangment of the particles of the exter- nal substances; it is from that peculiarity that we decide whether a body is solid or fluid, — - whether it be rough or smooth, blunt or sharp. In the organs of hearing, sound in general is excited by impressions on the auditory nerves, through the medium of the tympanum, and it is owing to the various undulations of the air, mo- dified and altered by the organization of the ex- ternal fabric of the ear, that sound in general is made sound particular, sound particular mani- fested by the variety of tones so distinctly per- ceived by those who have what is called a good mieal analysis, of any portion of it, can only be accomplished after death; and consequently during the life of the system the excretions only are the parts with which the chemist may amuse himself in examining. ear. 218 ear. In the organ of hearing sound may be considered the genus, tones the species. In the organ of smelling the sensation of odour is excited by the particles of bodies which are applied to the olfactory nerves through the medium of the scneiderian membrane : odour in general is the genus, the quality of those odours the species, whether aromatic or fetid. In the organs of taste, the sensation of flavour is excited by the different substances more es- pecially received for food, and which are appli- ed to the nerves of the tongue ; whilst flavour in general constitutes the genus, the variety of sensations which different kinds of food pro- duce constitute the species. In the organ of vision the rays of light im- pressed on the retina of the eye excite the sen- sation of illumination in general, and like dif- ferent articles of food which excite different fla- vours, different bodies conveyed to the eye produce 219 produce different colours. In vision illumina- tion is the genus, of which colours are the spe- cies ; every substance therefore in nature which exists, of which the eye has any cognizance whatever, whether it be black or white, brown or yellow, or in short whatever colour or ap- pearance it may assume, must be considered, to be coloured. However ignorant we may be of the proximate cause of sensation, we are cer- tain only of the fact itself, and that it does not exist in the external substance by which the impres- sion is made, but in the living and sensitive prin ciple alone by which the impression is received. In the investigation of the doctrine of sensation the question is not, as I have before detailed, whe- ther sensation abides in bodies external to the living system, but what are the bodies which convey impressions upon the organs of sense in general by means of which sensations are ex- cited and produced. ® Vide Chap. 3, p. 53. Part I. Had 220 Had physiologists and chemists been properly informed of the distinction which exists between impression and sensation — between the thing re- ceived and the receiver, between the substance without and the sensitive principle within, we should have been spared thepain of hearing opini- ons promulgated and taught by those few, very few individuals, who lay down the law, and who have been deluding the world for some cen- turies past down to the present moment, — we should have been spared the folly of being call- ed upon to believe opinions that are not more revolting to the feelings than they are to the good, common unsophisticated sense and ap- prehension of mankind, — amongst a multitude of other things equally erroneous, 1. That matter in general, instead of being essentially different is actually of the same na- ture ; that instead of being separable into solid, liquid, and gaseous, that on the contrary the primary particles of matter are essentially solid and massy. 2dly. 221 2dly. That instead of these particles being penetrable and permeable, as we behold them to be, not only to the active powers of life and of sensibility, — of light and of fire, as well as of a variety of other chemical agents ; it is absolutely affirmed, that the softest bodies are equally solid with the hardest, and all essentially impe- netrable. 3dly. That notwithstanding this pretended impenetrable and impermeable quality inherent in the primary particles of matter, they ne- vertheless possess powers of attraction in pro- portion to their quantity ; that one mass of mat- ter by virtue of this power acts upon another mass, and both upon each other, not only by immediate contact, but independently of it, not only where it is, but where it is not ; — that these imaginary powers subsisting as causes produce effects at themost remote parts of the solar system that can be conceived, which effects are mani- fested by the motions which the different planets display, of which that system is composed, — as well might it be affirmed, that something might be 222 be produced out of nothing, as to say, that a body can act where it is not. 4thly. Instead of considering the liquid which covers to an unfathomable depth two-thirds of the surface of the earth, exclusive of what constitutes rivers and lakes, and which is kept suspended in the firmament above in the form of atmosphere and clouds, and known by the name of ivater, to be the base and fountain of fluid- ity in general, it is on the contrary supposed that this immense ocean is formed by, and is an effect produced by the combined union of two factitious airs, each of which are more than nine hundred degrees rarer than the same given bulk of water. # * The universal admission of this hypothesis is only a fur* ther proof of the little philosophy which exists with our expe- rimentalists, and how liable they are to draw false conclusions from the facts they behold. If this hypothesis were admitted, it would go to the absurdity of supposing that the effect is greater than the cause. The experiment upon which this opinion is founded only goes to prove, that although water can be con- verted into gas by the agency of certain powers, and that by ihe substraction of those powers water is reproduced ; in the same manner as by the agency of fire water can be converted into ste;» m,and Instead 223 5thly. Instead of supposing that the atmos- phere acts like other gaseous bodies (under equal degrees of external influence) by the attributes of expansibility which are inherent in them equally in every direction, it is universally supposed that the pressure of the atmosphere upon the earth, and upon every thing by which its sur- face is covered, is the pressure of gravity or of weight; that the weight and perpendicular pres- sure of the atmosphere is in the proportion of 15 lbs. to every square inch of surface; and as every square foot contains 144 square inches, these must consequently sustain the pressure of 21801b. weight. Supposing, therefore, that a man in an erect posture, taking one part with another, is commensurate to a square of 16 in- ches, it must in that case follow, that the per- pendicular pressure upon him is equal in weight to 2880 lb. But, alas ! if he happens to have a broad brimmed hat, a parasol to keep off the sun, or a parapluis to shelter him from the rain, the by the substraction of fire water again formed; as well into a solid form as we see it in ice and snow by certain changes which it is the duty of the chemist to discover, but of which he does not as yet appear to have any knowledge. weight 224 weight must in that case be as great as it is when he is in a recumbent position, and when the superficies of his body may be consequently supposed encreased to a square of four feet at least; the weight in that case must be equal to 11520 lb. ; and if the composition is further ex^ tended, by adding the lateral and circumambient pressure, which is supposed to be more than double, the latter sum it is affirmed (and very justly affirmed if the position was true from whence these conclusions are drawn) that in a man of about six feet high, and of the usual bulk, the extent of surface being at least sixteen feet, he must sustain a weight in every direction of 30720 lbs. or more than sixteen tons weight for his ordinary load ! ! ! 6thly. Instead of supposing that the colouring quality of matter abides in the body from whence it flows, like every other quality which causes impressions upon the other organs of sense, it is absolutely affirmed, and universally believed > that the colour of a body proceeds from what the body does not possess ; instead of arising from 225 fromraysofcolourwhichissueoutofitexciting up- on the optic sense, particular sensations to which the names of particular colours have been given, it is supposed that the colour of every body pro- ceeds from rays of colour which were never ad- mitted within it ; but that are repelled from it; and that a white body is white because it reflects all the rays but absorbs none; and a black body is black because it ab- sorbs all the rays and reflects none ; it is there- fore concluded that neither black or white are colours. I would, however, ask any of these worthies to tell me whether the matter by which the sensation of white or of black is excited is not as actual and potential as that by which the sensation of red or of green, &c. &c. and whe* ther snow and jet have not an actual existence, as certainly as gold and indigo. 7thly. Instead of supposing that the quality of matter by which the sensation oicold is produced is as absolute as the quality of matter by which the sensation of heat is excited, it is on the con- trary universally affirmed and believed that cold is a negative not a positive property ; that during the winter season of the year, when we behold fluids converted into a solid form, water be- come ice, vegetation suspended, animation of- q ten 226 ten rendered torpid and destroyed by mortifi- cation ; — although these effects are produced by that modification of matter called cold, it may perhaps appear somewhat strange to men of common feelings, who possess common sense, that the actual existence of the matter of cold instead of being admitted should be denied by all the most enlightened chemists and experi- mental philosophers as they call themselves, of the present day ; — and that none but ignorant fools, if any there are so foolish dare to think otherwise; that the effects which are produced in the polar regions, as well as in other countries during the winter do not proceed from the matter of cold but that they arise from the privation of heat; as if snow or ice applied to bodies in which those effects take place, have not an actual exist- ence, as much as a flame of fire by the im- pressions from which the sensation of heat is ex- cited and combustion produced. 8thly. Although the tops of the most lofty moun- tains, at all degrees of latitude from the equator to the poles, are uniformly and everlastingly cover- ed with snow and ice, and the sensation of cold so excessive that neither man or beast are cap- able of supporting its influence : it is nevertheless generally 227 generally believed that the sun is a globe ofjire, that is to say, that the purer the medium through which the intensity of the fire ought to be most felt, and the nearer it is approached, the colder it will feel. 9thly. That fire is capable of existing in two separate states, in a sensible and in a latent state; in the one exciting the sensation of heat to ani- mated beings, and expansion to the medium by which it is contained; in the other state it nei- ther produces heat or expansion. lOthly. Although every fact which we pos- sess goes to prove that every particle of fire belonging to our system is repellent and expan- sible, — imponderable and destitute of gravity or weight; it is nevertheless believed that it is by the attraction of gravitation that the different heavenly bodies are dragged and pulled down by the sun, a globe of repellent fire, as the at- tracting centre of the whole solar system. llthly. That although rare bodies have as great a tendency to rise as dense bodies to fall, and that the gravity of one body is consequently relative to the levity of another; although these facts are universally true, the fourth law of the Newtonian philosophy is nevertheless founded in direct 228 direct violation of them, viz. that all bodies are mutually heavy or gravitate towards each other ! 12thly. And finally, it is concluded that a cart which is of itself essentially passive, and only offers resistance to an external force, never- less draws the horse as much as the horse draws the cart; that is to say that the effect produced by a passive body is equal to the effect produced by one which is active : and from this false as- sumption is founded the third grand and gene- ral law of nature, which is supposed in a great measure to regulate the whole planetary system viz. that re-action is always equal and contrary to action. However obnoxious or ridiculous I may ap- pear for disbelieving what to me is contrary to common sense and common apprehension, al- though sanctioned by the greatest authorities and universal acquiescence, I shall neverthe- less give it my veto, and shall, at a future op- portunity, shew that the assumption of these false facts for principles, have led to the greatest errors in the science of physics that can be conceived. fi ^ 4 '% END OF THE FIRST PART. Plummer and Brewis, Printers, Love Laus, Little £s»tcheap. Q X 'v> ^ ', f %r$ vV ^ ,0o. 5> o*. £ A > y./ ^ c*- ^% £ c .t..< oo x 6 % ."ft - = 4 7*, 3 - ^ '^ c* V * St? ^- n - ^ -v ,0 © ■- " ^ /- ' 9 N V C ^ .'V s - *, . '++ ^ %• V- ,\N \ .A V>^ v v* >• ,\\ x << /? '<- O.V 'A. 1)1 "SJU c Smk. Ill 029 815 341 5 I 1 1 1 m ■