HUU HB1 wasmmfiBm im mSs kSBw k&: Kl LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. (ffijptp Snjnjrig^i !ftt._. Shelf.,.:........ i.W^' ate f -;<■.: £> THK Prodigal Son A MONOGRAPH. EXCURSUS ON CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER, O. B. WILLCOX, STONE PROFESSOR OF PASTORAL THEOLOGY AND SPECIAL STUDIES IN CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL^ AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY, No. 150 Nassau Street, New York. \% c 10i COPYRIGHT, 1S90, AMERICAN TRACT SOCIETY. CONTENTS. Page. The Parable 7 Luke's Eeasons for Inserting It, ....... 9 Parties Ee presented by the Two Sons, ... 10 Attitude of Jesus Toward the People, 11 Use of Miracles, .13 Changed Attitude of the Pharisees Toward Jesus, . . 14 The Three Parables of the Trilogy 17 A Chief Object of the Parable of the Prodigal Son, . 18 Commencement of the Parable 19 Motives of the Younger Son, 20 Gradual Growth of Evil in Him, 24 What " Substance" He Wastes, .... 27 Momentum in Souls, . 28 Who Was the " Citizen" ? 31 '•• Filled" —not " Fed," 33 Coming to Himself, 36 Nothing Moral in His First Utterance, ..... 37 Our Lord's Object in That, ..... 38 Unsound Views of God's Attitude Toward the Guilty, . 42 Important Omission by the Prodigal, 44 True Character of the Elder Son, 49 Character of the Pharisees, „ 50 Christ's Opinion of Them, . . ... . 51 Why the Elder Son Eemained, . 52 Dramatic Skill in Picturing the Servant, 54 Elder Son Has No Use for " Father," 58 Elder Son a True Pharisee 59 His Spirit Toward His Brother, 01 Jesus a Vigorous Hater, t>5 CONTEXTS. EXCURSUS. 1. Christ Taught as One Having Authority, , . 70 2. He Pressed the Truth with Uncompromising Force. 73 3. How He Taught Doctrines 75 4. How He Taught by Silence 79 5. How He Taught by Acts, 85 The Conversation at the Well, 86 6. His Use of the Old Testament 88 7. Lessons from His Miracles 89 8. His Use of Paradox and Solecism, 93 9. His Skill in Exhibiting Character, 94 10. His Word Pictures, 97 11. His Style in Other Eespects, 99 12. His Illustrations from Familiar Objects, . , . 101 13. His Use of the Parable 102 14. How He Draws Out His Hearers 106 ILLUSTRATION. For Explanation, 107 For Impressing Truth, . . . . 108 For Awakening Sympathy, 109 Christ the Grand Illustration, Ill All the Messianic Prophecies Blend in Him, . . . 112 PREFACE. The parable of the Prodigal Son has long been a favor- ite study with the author. It is therefore now impossi- ble to recall and duly credit the source of every sugges- tion here used. Not a few fruitful hints of the story, which had occurred, in the author's studies, to himself, were subsequently found in various commentaries. These it was not thought necessary to acknowledge. In all instances, however, in which suggestions could be traced to those to whom they were due, credit has been given. Thanks are especially due to Eev. Dr. W. H. Willcox, of Maiden. Mass.. for very much and most valuable aid. CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, January, 1890. THE PARABLE. Luke xv : 11-32. And he said, A certain man had two sons : And the younger of them said to his father. Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living. And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his jour- ney into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living. And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land ; and he began to be in want. And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country ; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine. And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat : and no man gave unto him. And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger. I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee, and am no more worthy to be called thy son : make me as one of thy hired ser- vants. And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him. and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him. And the son said unto him, Father. I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son. Bat the father said to his servants. Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him : and put a viii THE PARABLE. ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet : and bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it ; and let us eat. and be merry : for this my son was dead, and is alive again ; he was lost, and is found. And they began to be merry. Now his elder son was in the field : and as he came and drew nigh to the house, he heard music and dancing. And he called one of the servants, and asked what these things meant. And he said unto him, Thy brother is come ; and thy fa- ther hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and sound. And he was angry, and would not go in : therefore came his father out, and entreated him. And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment ; and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my friends : but as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf. And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me. and all that I have is thine. It was meet that we should make merry, and be glad : for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again ; and was lost, and is found. Yhe Prodigal §on. In the common judgment of Biblical schol- ars this parable is the gem of the whole se- ries uttered by our Lord. While its rich truths have fed the mind of the world, the pathos of the story has melted its way into the heart. Had the Great Teacher long been elaborating it, or did it fall, at the moment, from his lips, perfect as a dewdrop in its beauty ? The query can only be added to the multitude of others revolved by John Foster. "I go through life," he said, "treasuring up questions to be answered in heaven." It seems to have been for two reasons that the "beloved physician," Luke, to whom alone we owe the report of the parable, stored it among the materials for his work. First, this is the gospel of contrasts. 1 And 1 These are, in truth, so mimerous in the biography by Luke as to lead us through a ceaseless succession of lights and shades. Most of them are preserved only by him. See the doubts of Zacha- rias (1 :18), and the faith of Mary (1 :38), the child Jesus and the doctors in the temple (2 :41— 46), the Baptist's contrast of himself 10 THE PRODIGAL SOX. what more natural than that lie should seize with eagerness a parable which so exquis- itely contrasts the broken-hearted swineherd with the immaculate elder brother? But, for a second reason, Luke would gladly avail himself of this parable. Matthew photo- graphs the Master as the Royal Lawgiver, Mark as the Mighty Worker of miracles, John as the Son of God. Luke pictures Him as the Friend of Man. 1 From the angels' song of peace and good will at Bethlehem, to the ascension, in which (as no other evangelist has recorded), "while He blessed them, He was parted from them and carried up into heaven/' it is as the benignant Human Friend that He looks out on us in the third gospel. And where, more with Christ (3 : 16), Christ and Satan on the mount (4 : 1-12), Naa- man and the woman of Sarepta, and the lepers and widows of Is- rael (4 : 25-28), the Baptist's disciples fast, Christ's not, (5 : 33). new wine and old wine-shins (5 :37), woes added to blessings (6 :24- 26), the beam and mote in the eye (6:4:2), the two foundations (6:47), the Baptist an ascetic, Jesus not (7:34), Simon and the woman who was a sinner (7 :39), Jesus amidst the hired mourners (8 :53), Chorazin and Capernaum (10 :13), Mary and Martha (10 :39- 42), Ninevites and Jews (11 :31), faithful and faithless servants (12 :47), the hundred sheep, one lost (15 :3), the ten pieces of money, one lost (15 :8), the prodigal and his brother (15 :li), the rich man and Lazarus (16:19-31), the thankful and thankless lepers (17:18), the Pharisee and publican (18 :P— 14), the servants with the pounds (19 : 12), the tears and hosannas on Olivet (19 : 37), the rich and the poor widow at the treasury (21:1), the good Samaritan and the priest and Levite (10:30-37), the penitent and blaspheming malefactors (23:39). These vivid chiar-oscuro contrasts, lighting up the narrative with their Correggio-like effects, seem almost to lend color to the legend (drawn bv Ap. York, as quoted in Smith's Bible Diction- ary, from Nicephorus. ami from the Menology of the emperor Basil), that Luke was an artist as well as physician. One of these word- pictures, that of the hired mourners scoffing: at Jesus, is an ad- mirable scene for a painter. The mercenary performers, sud- denlv checking their groans and wails to strike attitudes and make grimaces at the calm, majestic Stranger, remind one of Ma- caulav's picture, from "Comus," of Milton's genius surrounded by the buffoons of the Restoration. "Amidst these that fair muse was placed, like the chaste ladv of the Masque, lofty, spotless and serene, to be chattered at and pointed at and grinned at by the whole rout of satvrs and goblins." 1 Bernhardt "Progress of Doctrine in the New Testament. 5 THE PRODIGAL SON. H beautifully thau iu the sceue of the father falling on the neck of the returning prodigal, is our Lord shadowed forth to us as the Friend of Man? Do the two sons in the parable represent the Jews and the Gentiles? The true answer to this question, much debated, would seem to be that the elder brother and the prodigal stand for any persons, anywhere, who share in their spirit. 1 Like a geologic specimen broken from the seam at which two different strata unite, the story epitomizes two vast sec- tions of human life and character. So far forth as the Jeiv on the one side and the Gen- tile on the other fell into these sections, they find their types in the prodigal and his brother. 2 But to study the geologic specimen most in- telligently we must see it "in situ" — in con- nection with the bed-rock from which it was broken. And, to discover the first and most natural aim of Jesus in this parable, we must 1 "Who is this elder son?" The question was once asked in an assembly of ministers at Elberfeldt, and Daniel Krummacher made answer, "I know him very well. I met him only yester- day." "Who is he?" they asked eagerly, and he replied solemnly, "Myself." He then explained that on the previous day. hearing that a very gracious visitation of God's goodness had been received by a very ill-conditioned man, he had felt not a little envy and irritation. 2 But, if the parable represents Jews and Gentiles, it must be only by indirect suggestion. It is a maxim in science to assume no more causes than your phenomena require. The parable is a most natural and admirable reply to the cavil of the scribes and Pharisees. In rebuking them it finds its sufficient occasion. The elder son is so true a Pharisee, and the younger so true a publican, that no farther solution seems required. Alford, too fin loco), well says that the admission of Gentiles into Christ's church (as of the returning prodigal into the home) was not yet so disclosed that our Lord would represent them as of one family with the Jews. He adds that the Gentile should be the elder, the Jew not being constituted in his superiority till 2,000 years after the creation. 12 THE PRODIGAL SOX. return it to the occasion on which it was uttered. As He was slowly journeying and teaching in Perea, on his way to Jerusalem and the cross, the publicans and sinners, outcast and despised, whom no other rabbi would allow r to approach him, gathered about the Master. 1 Here, as elsewhere, now as aforetime, the common people heard Him gladly. Simple souls as they were, they loved Him for what was really the profoundness of his view T of humanity. Shallow rabbis and scribes were intent on the incidentals of mankind, on office, wealth, and reputation. But Jesus, with Divine insight, looking through to the imperishable worth and essential dignity of man as man, apart from his accidents, led the poorest and guiltiest of his countrymen to feel that "one touch of nature makes the whole world kin." 2 They felt that He "found" them, that He came home to their inmost life. He dealt plainly with their sins. But, as a friend who could be trusted, a teacher who brought down to their understanding a world of such truth as had never dawned before on their vision, He won their deepest love. In reaching them He came closer to the core of humanity than in dealing with classes of men more deeply enmeshed in the conventionali- 1 De Wette (Handbuch zum N. T.) renders the imperfect, r\uerus, of the waiting Redeemer, we have in the familiar story of the Scotch mother whose daughter had wandered into a life of sin in London. The child, growing penitent, resolved to return to her home. From fear of discovery by old neighbors, she timed her arrival at night. As she caught sight, from a hill-side, of her mothers cottage, she was surprised to see a light at the window. Coming to the door, she was still more surprised to find that unfastened. And when, after a warm welcome, she asked what these things meant, the answer was, "My child, that lipht has been set at the window, and that door left un- fastened, every night since you went away." THE PRODIGAL SON. 43 The foundations of the great deep of sympathy, affection, joy, in him, have been broken up. This is their hour and the power of love. " And ran and fell on his neck," in all his rags and dirt, as the prodigal is, from among the swine. Observe that this is an oriental father of the early ages. In what dignity the head of the household ruled his little realm! How the children stood uncovered before him, and rev- erently deferred to his commands ! But the love of this father, like a bursting freshet, has swept his dignity along its current. He can wait for no ceremony. His heart will have its way. " And kissed him." Or, as the Greek 1 implies, kissed him again and again, in a passion of love that could find no utterance. "What warmer reception," exclaims Bengel, " could the prodi- gal have had coming back from a faithful life?" A fine practical comment is all this on James 4:8, "Draw nigh to God, and He will draw nigh to you." Observe that the embrace and the kiss go before the opening of the prodigal's lips. 2 Enough for the father that it is his long-lost 1 Ka.T»i\ricrev. In the tender and tearful scene of Paul's de parture on the shore at Miletus (Acts 20 : 37) we have the same word. 2 "Trench on the Parables," p. 332. Edersheim (1,507) says: "As regards the sinner, all other systems (than the Christian sys- tem) know of no welcome to him till, by some means, inward or outward, he has ceased to be a sinner and become a penitent. They would first make him a penitent and then bid him welcome to God. Christ first welcomes him to God and so makes him a nenitent." He calls attention to the fact that the words " to re- pentance " (Matt. 9 : 13 ; Mark 2 : 17), which are excluded from the Revision, are spurious. But nothing of all this, of course, implies that one who should continue impenitent would continue to be wel- come. 44 THE PRODIGAL SOX. son returning-. If any coldness is still left in Lis heart, the father will not keep him at a distance till the frigid reception has frozen him dead. Rather, with the warmth of his generous wel- come he will melt the coldness out. If any low motive still lingers in him, the father, with his own higher life, will raise it. 21. "And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight; I am no more worthy to be called thy son." His resolution has persisted, his peni- tence has held out, through all the long journey from the far land. 1 But the striking fact in these words of the prodigal, which has been often noticed, is that he entirely omits the request to be made one of the hired servants. 2 Has he forgotten it ? That is incredible. Has his pride rallied against it? His humble confession of sin forbids that ex- planation. Two solutions have been offered. One is that his father's magnanimous welcome shames him out of the thought of that humili- ation. He shrinks from it, as a reflection on his father's sincerity. It would seem like class- ing his father with the citizen who had sent him to the swine. He has been living so long amidst selfishness and heartlessness that this 1 " Beweist die Ernstlichkeit unci Xachhaltigkeit seiner Rene." De Wettc. 2 This request, which the Revision repeats here, but only in the margin, is inserted (in brackets) in the Greek text by Westcott and Hort. It wa^. however, so evidently thrust in by some superser- viceable copyist, who supposed Luke had forgotten it, as to be be- yond question spurious. THE PRODIGAL SON. 45 flood of disinterested love bewilders him. Coin- ing out of darkness, lie is dazzled by so mnch light. Deterred from saying what he had in- tended, he knows not what to say. Another, and perhaps better, interpretation of our Lord's thought, in suppressing these words of the prodigal, is that the father inter- rupts him. It is he who prevents the proposi- tion. He has seen enough, in the son's whole manner and tearful confession, to show that he has returned a changed man. Before this con- fession and these words of deep contrition he could only embrace him with a father's kiss. But now he sees him ripe for the old honors of his sonship. The moment the prodigal speaks of his un worthiness, therefore, the father, antici- pating what may follow, seems to silence him with tender pereinptoriness, saying, as it were, "No, no, my son! Away with all that! It is out of the question!" But another beautiful feature of the story is that the father's reply is made, not to the son, but to the servants. 22, 23. "But the father said to his serv- ants, Bring forth quickly the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and shoes on his feet, and bring the fatted calf and kill it, and let us eat and make merry." The meeting of the father and the prodigal had been "afar off." The two have been return- 46 THE PRODIGAL SON. ing to the house together. They are now in the midst of the servants, who have gathered to the spectacle of their master running in so strange fashion. The sight of the prodigal, in his un- kempt and soiled and ragged condition, moves them to anything but reverence. Presumably, both father and son perceive it. The father, therefore, in one breath, with the same words, replies to both the son and the servants. He summons these menials to fall at once into their old relations to the son. As aforetime they are to serve him. The question whether he is to become as one of them is promptly and effect- ually answered. " Bring forth quickly." The adverb (added by the revisers) sIioavs his excitement in the ex- cess of his joy. He must have his son instantly honored. "The best robe " — a rich festal robe, in honor both of the son and of the occasion. 1 "And put a ring on his hand." From the most an- cient times the ring was a token of special con- fidence and distinction. 2 "And shoes on his feet." The prodigal, after his long wandering and miserable penury, may easily have been barefoot. And this, among the ancients, was 1 Srox;?, from o-re/Uw, our English "stole," is any stately robe; and Ions sweeping garments wotuld have eminently this stateli- ness about them; always, or almost always, a garment reaching to the feet. or. trainlike, sweeping the ground. Trench, "Synonyms of the New Test.,'' p. 186. 2 Gen. 41:42, Esther 3:10. '-This right of wearing the golden ring, which was subsequently called the "jus annuli aurei,' or the ' jus annulorum,' remained, for several centuries at Rome the exclusive privilege of senators, magistrates, and equites, while all other persons continued to use iron rings."' Appian. quoted in Anthon's Diet, of Gr. at once explained when we remember that we have here to do with a parable, and that expiation has no place in the relations between man and man.'' Very ingenious— and very needless. It is quite considerate in the interpreters to looh with so much care after the orthodoxy of our Lord. There was no need that this parable, or any other, should cover the whole scheme of redemption. 2 Abbott's Commentary on Luke (in loco). THE PEODIGAL SON. 49 We now come to a chief, if not the chief, object for which the parable was spoken. The elder son brings in a contrast, broad and deep, with the prodigal. There has been, as to this brother, considera- ble difference of opinion. Trench 1 sees in hiin, or in those whom he represents, "a low, but not altogether false, form of legal righteousness." He pnts it to his credit that while his brother had wandered he had remained at home. He points to the father's allowing this son's boasts of his own fidelity to go mi contradicted. Goebel, 2 on the contrary, offers no extenuation for him whatever. This last was the view, as cited by Trench, of Jerome, Theophylact, and others. Our Lord's intent in picturing the elder son is to be learned from the circumstances in which He spoke. Beyond question, the three parables of the Lost Sheep, the Lost Coin, and the Prodi- gal Son were all uttered on the same occasion. They were in reply to the complaint of the Phari- sees and scribes, "this man receiveth sinners and eateth with them." In the first two Jesus portrays his eagerness to win these outcasts to Himself. In the third He advances a step far- ther. Turning more directly to his critics, He makes the elder son pose as the true Pharisee. Kitto (art. Pharisee) remarks that Paul, who must have known of our Lord's denunciations 1 "Parables," p. 340. So De Wette, Hier spricht sich nun der Tugendsioiz des sonst wirklich, unbesenoitiien gOi/eentes &olmes, &c. 2 "The Parables of Jesus," by Siegfried Goebel, trans, by Prof. Banks, pp. 214, 215. 50 THE PRODIGAL SON. of this sect, not only has not a word against it, but boasts of having belonged to it. 1 Doubtless there were Pharisees and Pharisees. Josephus 2 makes them to have been 6000 in number. Mco- demus, one of them, and Joseph of Arimathea, probably another, were certainly estimable men. But, with two or three such exceptions, those w r hom our Lord encountered, or of whom He spoke, w^ere all that we mean by the word Phari- see as used in our day. The disposition of many modem writers to palliate their faults gets no countenance from Him. Infallible as He was in judging men, the very soul of impar- tiality and charity as He was, He never, unless possibly in a single slight particular, 3 lightens by a shade the blackness of their character. Take in succession the instances in which He meets or refers to them. He warns his disci- ples that, unless their righteousness shall ex- ceed the righteousness of the scribes and Phari- sees, they shall in no case enter into the king- dom of heaven. 4 An ominous intimation as to the future of the Pharisees themselves. He is maligned by them in the base calumny that He represents Satan on earth. 5 He bids his disci- ples beware of their teaching. 6 They approach Him with their crafty questions as to divorce. 7 He declares that they lay on men heavy burdens, 1 Acts 23 : G ; 26 : 5 ; Phil. 3 : 5. 2 Antiquities— Book 17, chap. 2. 3 Matt. 23 : 23, in regard to the tithes of mint, anise and cum- min. " These ought ye to have done, and not to have left the others undone." 4 Matt. 5 : 20. 5 Matt. 9 : 34. G Matt. 10 : 6. 7 Matt. 19 : 3 THE PRODIGAL SON. 51 which they will not move with one of their own fingers, 1 that they are hypocrites, 2 that they will neither enter the kingdom, of heaven themselves nor suffer others to enter, 3 that they make their converts two-fold more the sons of hell than themselves, 4 that they have cast off judgment, mercy and faith, 5 that, while making an out- ward show of cleanness, they are full within of extortion and excess, 6 that they are like whited sepulchres, 7 that they have the malice of them who slew the prophets, 8 that they are a genera- tion of vipers who can hardly escape the judg- ment of hell, 9 that they love ostentation and flattery; 10 aud we are told that they rejected for themselves the counsel of God, 11 and were lovers of money. 12 In one instance they endeavor to drive him over from Perea into Judea, where they would have had Him in their power, 13 as hunters drive their game into a corral. They send officers to take Him, 14 and, by the questions in regard to the woman taken in adultery, 15 and about the tribute-money, 16 they lay snares for his life. This, then, being so clearly our Lord's opinion of the Pharisees, we can look for no different character in their representative, the elder son 1 Matt. 23 : 4. 2 Matt. 23 : 13. 3 Matt. 23 : 13. 4 Matt. 23 : 15 5 Matt. 23 : 23. 6 Matt. 23 : 25. 7 Matt. 23 : 27. S Matt. 23 : 31 9 Matt. 23 : 33. 10 Luke 11 : 43. 11 Luke 7 : 30. 12 Luke 16 : 14 13 This, as Trench holds, in '-'Studies in the New Testament."' is the true explanation of Luke 13 : 31. 14 John 7 : 32. 15 John 8 : 1-11 (if we account this genuine). 1(> Matt. 22 : 15—17. o'Z THE PRODIGAL SOX. in the parable. When the hand of Jesus drew a portrait it was a good likeness. His object was neither resentful nor irrecon- cilable. He would fain, by exhibiting them to themselves, induce them to avert through re- pentance their coming doom. 25. "Now his elder son was in the field. " And how comes he there? Why has he not been invited into the house? Why has he not been called to share the rejoicing? Clearly enough, because the father has already seen enough of his spirit to know that he would decline. The elder son has, doubtless, often expressed his opin- ion of his brother — often thanked God that he was not as other men, or even as this prodigal. The father, when the younger son asked for his share of the goods, divided unto them his living. All that the younger son, when de- parting, had left behind had, therefore, been allotted to the elder. In reversion, if not in actual possession, it was his. 1 His work in the field is really, then, in his own interest. But, in form at least, he is still in his father's ser- vice. He is tithing mint, anise, and cummin. Like a true Pharisee he keeps a fair exterior. And, as we shall see, he makes the most of it. The younger son, after the disease of selfish- ness had begun to break out over him, found the contrasted spirit of his father a sharper, THE PRODIGAL SON. 53 though silent, rebuke than he could bear. Why is not the same effect wrought on his brother? Why has not he too taken his depart- ure? Because the same disease in him has struck in. Showing fewer eruptions, it is only so much the deeper and more deadly. A model, he imagines himself, of self-sacrificing, filial fidelity. The notion of any serious contrast between his father and himself has not oc- curred to him. Or if there be a contrast — so much the worse for his father. "And as he came and drew nigh to the house he heard music and dancing." Had he then had any- thing of the spirit of the true son, how promptly would he hasten into the house! How eager would be his cry, "What has happened? What is the good news?" With what glad heart- throbs, too, would he fall on the prodigal's neck and take up the refrain, "For this my brother was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found!" That he can possibly abstain from all this is itself, before a word from his lips, proof enough that his heart is unsound. He will soon give us proof more than enough. 26. "And he called to him one of the servants and inquired what these things might be." He does not, says Godet, feel at home in the house. ^N T o one within the doors has come up to his own level of zeal and labor for the house. He is shocked by their levity while there is so much to be done. The cruel necessity, therefore, 54 THE PRODIGAL SOX. is laid on liini of turning to one of the menials about the premises. In other words, not to put too fine a point upon it, he has already in spirit become "as one of the hired servants." He has sunk in soul to the plane of them with whom, in outward condition, he would scorn to he graded. He would rather consort with one of them than with his father. "And inquired what these things might be." There is an imperiousness in the very cast of the words — an insolent calling of the whole household to account. He will have an explana- tion of all this ado to which he has not been in- vited. Possibly he half suspects the cause of it. If so, that adds only more gall to his bitterness. 27. "And he said to him, Thy brother is come, and thy father hath killed the fatted calf, be- cause he hath received him safe and sound." With what singular dramatic fitness this low menial is made to speak — how exactly like him- self ! Not a clause, hardly a word, fails to betray the man that he is. Let us see. The father's announcement of the return of the prodigal glows with a tremulous joy. We seem to see a new light in the dim eyes, a light in which the glad tears glisten as he speaks. We seem to hear a voice broken with excess of feeling in his exulting cry, "'For this my son was dead and is alive again!" and then, repeating as for emphasis, "was lost and is found!" Kecovery, restoration, redemption, is THE PRODIGAL SON. 55 the thought that thrills him. But what is the servant's announcement of the same fact? How the glory and the beauty fade out of it. How clean gone is the festal charm! How meager and miserable a platitude is left! a Thy brother is come/' — has passed from one locality yonder to another here — "only that, and noth- ing more." The servant can appreciate nothing more. The father's words are to his what pyrotechnics are to the sticks that remain, what an overture of Beethoven is to the rosin and the strings. But again. "And thy father hath killed the fatted calf." Nothing has the servant to say of the robe, the ring, or the shoes. They are all nothing to him. They lie beyond his range of interest. But one thing he can appreciate — this fatted and petted calf. It fills his whole horizon. Probably he has fed and tended it. He has given his whole mind to it. He may have seen this swineherd returning in his rags from the far country. And it is for him that the master has ordered killed the servant's pet! He who has been feeding swine must now feed upon the fatted calf! With the wary diffi- dence of a true menial, he dares not give vent to his feeling. But his meaning is easily read between the lines. Once more, in the analysis of the servant's answer. Why, according to him, has the best of all the herd been sacrificed? Because the 56 THE PRODIGAL SOX. father has recovered his child from wretch- edness and disgrace? Because a soul has been won to a noble life? Nothing of all that. But " because he hath received him safe and sound." He has returned with a whole skin. No bones are broken. In this the servant's notions cul- minate. They rise no higher. The soul, with its interests, is nothing. The body is all in all. "The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, * * * and he cannot know them, because they are spiritually dis- cerned." And now we return to the elder brother. 28. "But he was angry and would not go in." He is not the man to consort with a vagabond. If his father in his weakness "receiveth sinners and eateth with them," so much the more must some one in the family retain his self-respect. "And his father came out and entreated him." The natural and just reply of the father to the announcement from the son that he would not go in, would have been, "Then let him stay with- out! If he has no more than this of the spirit of a true son or brother, let him remain till he comes to a better mind, where he is." But no. With the same impartial love with which he ran to embrace the prodigal, the father goes out to his brother. He does more than invite. There is no room here for the embrace or the kiss. Though the youth n^eds both, he would welcome neither. And so, as if de- THE PEODIGAL SON. 57 pendent on him, as if his presence in the honse were a necessity, the father stoops to entreat him to be reconciled. . As to the character of the Pharisees, Eders- heim 1 falls in with the judgment of our Lord. And this elder son, who represents them, now proceeds to show us how accurate is the por- traiture. 29. "But he answered and said to his father." Why these two w^ords, "his father " ? To des- ignate the person meant they are certainly not needed. There are but two parties to this inter- view. It could be no one else but his father that he answered. In the father's rejoinder (v. 31) we have (not, he said unto his son, but) "he said unto him." 2 Is it not designedly that our Lord, introducing the son's insolent reply, brings in these words? It was to his father, who at the moment was entreating him, that he answered in this arrogant style. So lost he w^as to all sense or thought of the reverence due from a son. And now another point must be noted. The younger son, as we have seen, nowhere loses sight of the dear word "father." Low as he 1 1 : 312, 313. "Indeed," he says, "some of the sayings of the rabbis, in regard to Pharisaism and the professional Pharisee, are more withering than any in the New Testament." "Their asser- tions of .purity were sometimes conjoined with Epicurean maxims betokening a very different state of mind;" as, "Make haste to eat and drink, for the world, which we quit, resembles a wedding- feast;" or this, "My son, if thou possess anything, enjoy thyself, for there is no pleasure in Hades, and death grants no respite." Maxims these to which also too many of their recorded stories and deeds form a painful commentary. 2 Likewise (v. 27) the servant "said unto him." 58 THE PRODIGAL SON. falls, he never sinks beyond sight of that. When he asks for his share of the goods, when among the swine he remembers his home, when he resolves to return, when he meets the em- brace and the kisses of welcome, that word comes again and again to his lips. Fearfully as he had strained the tie to the forsaken par- ent, he had never completely parted it. But this word is one for which his brother has no nse. He prefers not to recognize the relation. He has wandered a greater distance from his father in his heart than his brother had wandered with his feet. "Lo!" 1 the first word, which should be " father, " is more like a blow in the face. Sub- stantially it is, "See here! look you to this! how true and faithful a son you have been neglect- ing here at home! " And in view of the rever- ence expected from a son among the orientals of old towards a father, the affront seems still more gross. "These many years do I serve thee." Here leers on us again the face of the genuine Pharisee. We encounter him a little later in Luke's gos- pel. He is always as true to his character, in his utterances, as we have seen the hired servant to be to his own. "I fast twice in the week; I give tithes of all that I get." 2 The 1 "I&ov, defined in Thayer's lexicon as "a demonstrative particle * * * giving a peculiar vivacity to the style by bidding * * * the hearer attend to what is said." We should think it did, in this case, add a very peculiar vivacity to the style. 2 Luke 18 : 12. THE PRODIGAL SON. 59 Pharisee at the temple has drawn the Lord, as he imagines, far into his debt. He has done more than the law required. While an annual fast was prescribed 1 he had fasted twice in the week. While tithes of the increase of only the field and the cattle 2 were demanded, he had tithed all he acquired. So with this elder son. For these many years he has been heaping up merit. And, as the word 3 he uses intimates, it has been by a slavish drudgery, hard to bear. In this marvelous, disinterested, unrequited fidelity of his he has shrunk from nothing that could promote his father's interest. "And I never transgressed a command- ment of thine." Here again is the same type of Pharisee with him at the temple. "God," he cried, "I thank thee that I am not as the rest of men, extortioners," etc. How keen the irony of our Lord's putting this word, above all others, into his lips! He belongs to the class of worthies "which devour widows' houses," 4 "and are full of extortion and excess." 5 It is as if one of our modern Shylocks, who make "corners " in beef and grain and pork, were to thank the Lord for inspiring him with so tender an interest in the poor. But this elder son is like-minded. Boasting that he has never trans- gressed a commandment of his father, he is doing it at this identical moment. His father is entreating him, and he is insolently refusing, 1 Lev. 16 : 29-30. 2 Lev. 27 : 30-33. 3 SovAevw. 4 Luke 20 : 47. 5 Matt. 23 : 25. M THE PRODIGAL SOX. to go into the house. The perfection of his hypocrisy is exquisite. And now, haying established his own right- eousness, the way is open to exhibit the in- iquities of his father. "And yet/' notwithstanding ail I haye done for thee, "thou neyer gayest me a kid." In the Greek 1 he thrusts himself much more conspic- uously forward. "And to me," it reads, "thou neyer gayest." So before yet mentioning his brother he puts himself, in sharp contrast, beside him. And here, too, he shows how completely he is diyorced in feeling from his father. "Thou neyer gayest me" shows the same spirit as that of his brother in his "Give me the portion of the substance that ialleth to me" — the spirit 2 of which his brother had bitterly repented. And the elder son is putting everything down on the cold, legal ground of work and reward. 3 Love for his father has leaked out of his heart, and left it, like the bones in Ezekiel's vision, exceedingly dry. "Thou never gavest me a kid," the smallest of all possible creatures in the herd, "that I might make merry with my friends." How sharp the contrast here with the magnanimous sympa- thy, the all-embracing joy, of the father ! " That I might make merry with my friends," says the son. "Let us eat and be merry," says the 1 Kai e/ioi oiSeirore, 2 Alford (in loco). 3 Edersheim 2 : 26Q, THE PRODIGAL SON. 61 father. An electric charge can as well trav- erse half a net-work of steel, and no more, as the joy of a generous man can confine itself within him alone. The analogy between the sons is much closer than the elder imagines. The one had wished something set apart to him that he might feast separately in the far land. The other wishes something set apart that he may feast sepa- rately at home. The alienation from the father is in the two cases equally complete. The elder, showing the same spirit of which his brother had repented, is like the Pharisee in the temple, disgraced by the very extortion which was his chief charge against the pub- lican he so despised. But now, having opened the vials of his wrath on his father, he turns part of their contents on his brother. 30. " But when this thy son came." As a bee's cell is made to contain the most possible honey under a given surface, so do these words seem shaped to contain the utmost amount of gall. "This thy son" — as an angry brother among us would clearly enough indicate to his father his feeling with, "That boy of yours." But it is not clearly enough for this elder brother Something more explicit is to come. "Thy son," as many interpreters have noted, are words chosen to disclaim all relationship of his brother to himself. As he began with evad- 62 THE PRODIGAL SOX. ing the word "father," lie continues with eva- sion of "brother." The father alone must be responsible for the new-comer. "Came." So the elder son, too, has gone down to the level of the hired servant, Xo more than the servant can he appreciate the glory of the father's view of it — "dead and alive again; lost and found." He has become in soul (what his brother had thought to do only in outward condition) "as one of the hired serv- ants." "Which hath devoured 1 thy living with har- lots." "Devoured thy living," which I, by serving thee these many years, have toiled to keep and increase. "Thy living," an insinuation thrown in as a wedge of jealousy between the father and the prodigal. The fact was that the latter had wasted only his share of the estate. "With harlots" comes, as a climax, with the deadliest thrust of all. And it may be as false as it was malicious. Wasting substance with riotous living would not of necessity imply it. Even if it be true, the elder brother, who has not yet seen the prodigal, can hardly be supposed to have heard of it. He is bent on putting the worst construc- tion possible on the conduct of his brother. 2 Thou hast killed for him the fatted calf," while 1 'O KaTaayw, perhaps as strong and violent a word as could have been found. 2 Trench seems to us quite in error when in a note on the prodigal's wasting Ms substance (" Parables,-'' p. 322) he says, •• We are not, in this early part of the parable, expressly told, but from v. 30 we infer, that he consumed with' harlots the living which he had gotten from his father." Matthew Henry, in his commentary, comes much nearer the truth. THE PRODIGAL SON. 03 I could have not even a kid. Here again this brother shows how far he has descended to- ward the level of the servant. As completely as the servant he is absorbed in the loss of the calf. He is not ashamed to betray that his whole heart was on the creature. 31. "And he said unto him, Son." How beau- tiful the contrast of this with the son's arro- gance! "Son!" — if thou, that is, wilt not even recognize me as father, that shall not prevent me from claiming thee. The word itself then, before the appeal goes farther, is a tender re- minder. The Greek word 1 it represents is not the same with that for "son" just used by the elder brother. It is "my child," in the most touch- ing expostulation. " Thou art ever with me." 2 I am thy exceeding great reward. Why talk of kids and calves and jealous lines of ownership? In heart and in possessions let us be one ! "All that is mine is thine." 8 Let us be done with claims and rights, and fall into the union of love. It is a mistake in many writers, as it seems to us, who infer from the loving words of the father that he found something to approve in the elder son. Those words show nothing but 1 Tewov, child, while the brother had used uios. "The word (t4kvov) is used," says Thayer's lexicon, "in affectionate address, such as patrons, helpers, teachers, and the like, employ.'' lie cites Matt. 9 : 2, " Son, be of good cheer;" Mark 10 : 24, "Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches," etc. 2 Which is far better than your '-'friends," Bengal (in loco), 3 The younger son had already taken his share. 64 THE PRODIGAL SON. parental anxiety to pour some sweetness into the son's bitter spirit. Of complacency in his character they give no hint. To learn what is that character we have only to look to the words and acts of the son himself. In them there is no redeeming feature to be found. 32. "But it was meet to make merry and be glad." The making merry is outward rejoicing. The being glad is inward delight. "For this thy brother" (whom the older of the two had coldly called "thy son") "was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found." He had done more than "come," as his brother, with no sense of the greatness of the recovery, declared. And so the marvelous story, like a string of gems, with every word, almost, a brilliant, rounds to its close. The reader will perhaps complain that the older son has, in these pages, been judged too severely. But this son, as we have held, was intended by our Lord to represent the Pharisees. Several considerations prove this. Jesus was now directly addressing Pharisees, in reply to a cavil of theirs. The older brother treats the prodigal precisely as the Pharisees treated their outcast countrymen. This son has unmistak- ably the same features with the Pharisee pray- ing in the temple. Holding therefore that the elder brother is a Pharisee, and remembering our Lord's judg- ment of them, we seem forced to the conclu- THE PKODIGAL SON. <>5 sion that he meant to give their character to this brother. And if Ave look for his real spirit, not in the words of his father, but his own, we seem led to the same conclusion. What but righteous indignation toward a spirit like that of the Pharisees was possible, to our Lord? What but a discredit would any- thing else than indignation have been to Him? It is essential to a perfect character that one should be as good a hater as lover. Dr. Arnold, of Kugby School, said he never felt sure of a boy who only loved good. It was not till he began to hate evil that he knew him to be safe. Then he showed himself in earnest. Nor was it enough for the inspired writer (Heb. 1:9) to de- scribe our Lord as having "loved righteousness." Something more must be added. "Thou hast loved righteousness and hated iniquity; there- fore God, even thy God, hath anointed Thee." Jesus hated evil as intensely as he loved good. From the same lips that tenderly invite the la- boring and heavy laden fall those awful words, "Fill ye up, then, the measure of your iniquities. Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the condemnation of hell?'' The key to the mystery is not far away. "Ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers." "Ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretense make long prayers." They were saints in the synagogue and knaves 5 66 THE PRODIGAL SON. iii the market. And it was the sheer, pure love to the outraged poor of the Friend of publi- cans and sinners, who could weep with them that weep, which thundered in those sentences. It was the Good Shepherd turning against the wolves because He loved the sheep. The German artist, Maurice Eetzsch, has pic- tured, with deep spiritual insight, a battle be- tween angels and demons. The heavenly legions mount no guns, discharge no musketry. Xo sabre among them flashes in the air. They sprinkle roses, only, over the hosts of hell. But every rose, in falling, turns to flaming fire. It burns its way into the very vitals of whomso- ever it strikes, till he sinks and writhes in anguish. So is it with the wrath (not of the "lion of the tribe of Judah," but) of the Lamb, from which the guilty multitudes entreat the mountains to fall and hide them. This indignation of Jesus, like all righteous indignation, was at bottom pure benevolence. In the character of the ingrate son, boasting of his unrequited service, our Lord exhibits the Pharisees to themselves only that He may, if possible, even at the eleventh hour, draw them to repentance and life. KXCURSIJS. Christ as a Public Ye^cher. It niight be expected that a Divine Teacher would be instructive not only in the truths he would convey, but in his way of conveying them. If our Lord was infallible, He showed it no less in his methods and manner than in his subject-matter. That a the common people heard Him gladly" has been generally ascribed to the beauty of his life and doctrine, the tender- ness of his sympathy, the contrast, at every point, with the teachers to whom they had been accustomed. But He took care to be an effec- tive speaker. He showed marvelous power and skill in his use of occasions and object- lessons and words. How far the human in Him was aided by the Divine will ever, on earth at least, remain a mystery. What amount of study He gave to his style of speech, how far it was spontaneous and unconscious, will never be known. But, whatever may have been the process, the results remain as a charming and exhaustless theme for study. There has been, we are persuaded, a serious error as to this matter. The external acts of our Lord, in general, are by no means an 70 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. invariable guide to us. They were largely modi- fied by the usages of his life, land, and age. They were foliage — not roots; shifting sands — not bed- rock. We have naturally and rightly turned to the great principles He unfolded, which no conventionalities can reach, no changing cus- toms touch. So we have drifted under the impression that his methods of speech and instruction, like Ms costume and posture at meals, were peculiar to his day and locality. We hare looked little to them for suggestion and help in the great art of holding the attention and reaching the hearts of men. But this essay will fail of its purpose if it does not show that many of these methods were addressed, not to Jews of the first century, as such, but to man as man, to human nature and the human mind, working under laws that never can " Grow old or change or pass away." From the teachings of Jesus there are hints to be drawn as to practical tact in reaching and leading men, as to the choice of words, the shap- ing of sentences, the art of illustration, which to any Christian teacher are invaluable helps. I. "He taught them as one having author- ity (Matt. 7:29), and not as the scribes." He recognized the difference between moral and mere scientific truth. The latter follows from induction and ratiocination. It carries no self- evidential power. It shines, like a planet, in CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 71 reflected light. But moral truth, as a sun, carries a light of its own. It speaks with an impera- tive to the moral sense. And, in clear recogni- tion of all this, Jesus spoke. The scribes and lawyers, with their casuistries and sophistries, raised more doubts than they laid. Dialectics were the atmosphere in which they lived and breathed. In a mechanical way they skimmed the surface of things. It was with them as if one were to say of BaphaeFs Transfiguration, "This painting is of the right proportions of height to breadth. The pigments are laid on with the proper thickness. The laws of per- spective have been observed. Therefore it is a fine painting." Our Lord put the truth He taught, not only in such "sweet reasonableness," but in such com- manding power, that as the words fell from his lips the mind of the hearer echoed its reverent Amen! What occasion for argument there? It would have been as crutches to Samson. And in a Teacher who quietly and authoritatively assumed the truth of what He said there dwelt a power over the rough natures around Him like that which a resolute man has over a wild animal. In all this there is a lesson for a preacher of our time. He does not, indeed, speak like the Master with personally Divine authority. But that authority, if not in him, is behind him. The day for argument to establish the great staple 72 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. truths of our religion lias, in the main, gone by. Christianity has not, for many centuries, stood before the world as an experiment. It is no mendicant, with hat in hand to beg favors. In a Christian country the burden of proof, in any discussion of its great truths, lies on the objec- tor. These truths have often enough been weighed in the balances and not found wanting. The preacher who gratuitously puts them in again throws away his advantage. He dis- honors the word of his Master. "I am not in the pulpit/- Dr. W. M. Taylor has said, "to defend the Bible. The Bible is there to defend me." Life is too short, time is too precious, to be wasted in incessantly laying foundations. There is work enough to be done on the grand super- structure that from age to age so steadily and sublimely rises. The minister of Christ, therefore, who stands where he should, at the height of his vocation, will do no timid apologizing for the instruc- tions, invitations, and warnings he utters. Neither will he nervously declare or affirm or insist. We have no more occasion to re-enact the moral law of God than the law of gravita- tion. The wise preacher will take for granted the basilar truths of Christianity. He will as- sume them as the bed-plate on which the whole machinery of his service is to run. In all meek- ness, arrogating nothing to himself, yet remem- CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 73 bering in whose name lie stands, he will speak "as one haying authority. 7 ' II. Jesns pressed with uncompromising force whatever truth He had in hand. "I came not to send peace, but a sword. " "I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother." "Of him that wonld borrow of thee turn not thou away." "And he that hath none, let him sell his cloak and buy a sword." Paradoxes and half-truths had no terrors for Him. He knew that but half a globe can be seen at once. He knew that, to present a truth in all its broad relations, is often to press the soul rather with a surface, easily resisted, than with a point that pierces. A fully rounded, carefully balanced statement of a truth is an anodyne to the intellect. The work that the intellect ought to be summoned to do has been already done for it. "The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth," may indeed have been presented. But what will a mind receive of it that is too dormant to receive any- thing ? The amount of profit to the hearer will be in direct ratio to the activity stirred within him. That activity is what exercise is to a convales- cent. For the invalid's recovery no vehicle will answer in place of exertion of his own muscles. But a bold, perhaps hyperbolic, statement of a truth is a goad to the soul. Provoking re- sistance, it compels to thought. "But it leads to error!" No; the danger of misapprehension 74 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. is small. Tlie advantage of thinking one's way through the paradox is great. Our Lord was, therefore, more bent on stir- ring his hearers to receive some truth than on a vain attempt to load them with more truth than they would carry. Wielding the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, He looked rather to its temper and keenness than to its symmetry or beauty. It is quite impossible for us, to whom his pointed utterances have become dulled by long use, to appreciate the startling shock with which they struck his hearers' ears. The outcries of astonishment 1 in reply, show plainly that the arrow had reached its mark. This method of address is, in a modern teacher, of course liable to abuse. Easily it may run to an extravagance which the occidental mind is slower to forgive than the oriental hearers to whom Jesus spoke. But, none the less, it is a powder with which no wise preacher will wholly dispense. Precision of thought and speech is not the only requisite. Our congregations are more in danger of nodding a drowsy and un- meaning assent than of falling into error. Many a preacher, in mincing his words and cumber- ing his sentences to guard against misunder- standing, clogs their entrance to the minds of men. Better the truth incisively, clean of all obstructions. Then put the counterbalancing truth, if required, on some other occasion. 1 Matt. 19 : 25. CHEIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 75 III. It is often said that our Lord taught doc- trines less than Paul. It would be nearer the truth to say that He taught the more practi- cal aspects of doctrine. There is, perhaps, no one of such dogmas of the faith as are legiti- mately drawn from Scripture, and which con- front us in imposing order in our theologies, which does not, in some form, appear in his teachings. But as He himself brings down to us the majesty of the Most High under the lowly lineaments of a human life, so is it that these doctrines take shape in his simple, informal words. They lay by their stateliness of bear- ing and their regal costumes, and come home to the heart as work-day truths for common life. Jesus leads us into no metaphysical discussion of the origin or nature of sin. But in the exam- ple of the young ruler (Matt. 19:21-23) how fearfully He exposes its tenacious hold on the soul ! He gives us no treatise on the impotence of a godless morality to fulfill obligation. But as this same amiable youth turns away sorrow- ful with his great possessions, facing toward the dark, we seem to see the Master looking sadly after him with a lamentation like that over Jerusalem: "How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God !" Our Lord gives no doctrinal statement of atonement. He is little concerned to set the Great Kedemption, with its profound and awful mystery, sharply outlined before us in the dry 76 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. light of intellect. But with what touching tenderness does He commend it to the heart! "The Good Shepherd giveth his life for the sheep." 1 " This is my blood of the new cove- nant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins." 2 "The Son of man came to give his life a ransom for many." 3 His aim is not so much to draft a "plan of salvation" as to move the soul with the appeal of the transcendent fact. Jesus formulates no dogma of regeneration. But under exquisite imagery He shadows out the features of the momentous change. De- scribing it as a new birth, He teaches that it is a revolution of one's character as radical as if he were to go back into non-existence and com- mence his life anew. He gives it, in one of his word-pictures, as a strait gate, with an unwel- come humiliation to pride. The narrow portal, tearing off as we enter it all tinsel of self- righteousness, all faith in sacraments or creeds as a groundwork of hope, leaves the soul in its naked helplessness to throw itself on Christ. Again, Jesus figures the great change as leaven thrust into the meal. It is as gradual in the transformation, then, as it is radical and com- plete. Though at first like the distinct mass of the leaven, almost an alien principle in the soul, working against old habits, estimates, and moral drifts, it comes in time to dissolve and blend 1 John 10 : 11. 2 Matt. 26 : 28. 3 Matt. 20 : 28. CHEIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 77 itself as homogeneous with, the whole inmost life. So, instead of a dry, doctrinal treatise on regeneration, nnder a score or two of heads and sub-divisions, Jesus instructs us by this striking imagery, rich in its wealth of sugges- tion. Again, He discusses no dogma of the perse- verance of the saints. He spins no gossamer theory of the harmony of necessity and certainty, builds no cloudy structure of "Fixed fate, free will, foreknowledge absolute." But, looking on us through the loving features of the Good Shepherd, who knows his sheep and is known of them, He assures us, of his sheep, "they shall never perish, neither shall any man be able to pluck them out of my hand.'' (John 10 : 28). We shall find in his teachings no theologi- cal discussion of repentance. The questions, debated for centuries, whether faith or love or contrition is the first act of the renewed soul, whether "efficacious grace" or "natural ability" only is requisite, whether regeneration must precede conversion in the order of time or only in the order of nature, get no illumination from a word of his. But any benighted wanderer, sin-burdened, heart- sore, and glad to surrender his life to his Saviour, will find more light in the story of the prodigal returning, and the father's kiss, than in all the systems of theology ever constructed. 78 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. So as to justification. Whether the pardoned soul has been ransomed, according to the theory of the earlier Christian centuries, as a prisoner taken in fair fight, from the captivity of Satan, or delivered from a debt, on the commercial theory, or from a penalty, on the moral govern- ment theory, we shall not learn from the Great Teacher. But in the beautiful story of the "woman which was a sinner," who "loved much" and whose sins, which were many, were forgiven her, we have all the justification of which any guilty soul will need to know. In these methods of our Lord there is a lesson for the modern preacher. The mistake is com- mon of supposing that, unless one has taken up the doctrines serially, calling the roll and forming them in lines as for a parade, unless he deals with them in a more or less technical discussion of the ingenious theories with which our theologies attempt to explain them, he has failed to preach the doctrines. Jesus, if we may judge from his example, thought otherwise. Doctrines are instruments or implements to be used in the upbuilding of souls. To that end they ought to be well shaped and adapted. In the hands of too many a preacher, with his obsolete speculations, they are as if one were to cling to the watches, the flint and tinder, the matchlocks and plows and flails, of a century ago. The methods of Jesus are perennially new. They come home to the CHEIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHEE. ™ heart. They touch the deepest life at the core of one's being. They show these grand, eternal truths of the gospel as living truths, that vital- ize souls dead in sin. TV. It is instructive to study those silences of our Lord in which He refrained from audi- ble teaching. His sparse disclosures of the life beyond the grave, especially in contrast with the abundant and astonishing revelations of Mohammedan and Eomish teachers and Spiritualist mediums, have been often noted. His wise design seems to have been to mass, for a solid moral impact on the soul, the rewards on the one side, and the woes on the other, of the life to come. He knew the inevitable effect of a multitude of such details as to the surroundings, the language, the social life, the occupations, of the redeemed as would gratify our curiosity. These details and minutiae, even if it be possible to disclose them to us in our earthly life, would have comminuted and frittered away those weighty moral sanctions which He wished to bring to bear, in their un- broken bulk and weight, from the world to come. At another point there has been some wonder as to his silence. Why not have given us ample light as to denominational questions that so distract the Christian world? How easy for Him to have settled all controversy as to bap- tism of infants, immersion, predestination, church polity! What divisions and schisms He 80 CHRTST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. might have saved! How far more harmonious and effective might the churches, as one com- pact body, have been! Xatural questions these all seem. But is it certain that one vast organ- ism would have been more in the interest of the kingdom of Christ? Has it so proved in the Komish or the Greek church? Do we not all know the sure drift toward despotism of an immense corporate body necessarily entrusting enormous power to a few hands? Probably, with all the evils flowing from sectarian bigotry, it is better that Christians should fall off into vari- ous sects and communions than that the churches should, as a single huge organism, be ruled by a hierarchy. If this be so, it was well that the minor dis- tinctions, around each of which a denomination has crystalized, were not swept away by an utterance of the Master. But in single instances as well how striking in his silence! In the account of the woman taken in adultery (John 8: 3-11), assuming the passage to be genuine, how solemn is the pause after those searching words, "Let him that is without sin among you cast the first stone !" How suggestive of the yet more awful silence of eternity, in which guilty consciences may yet speak to souls. Again, when He is summoned to entertain Herod and his men of war by call- ing up infinite wisdom and omnipotence to per- form for their amusement (Luke 23:8-11), in CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 81 what majestic meekness, with sealed lips, He stands! In what unutterable pity, bound and helpless and mocked as He is, He looks on the king and his officers in the splendor of their purple and gold! Why has not some great artist taken the scene for his pencil? A still more striking lesson from the silence of Jesns we haye in the case of the Syrophoeni- cian woman. 1 We will consider this some- what more fully. "He entered into a house," says Mark, "and wonld have no man know it." He w^as tired down with excess of work in doing good. Elsewhere He w^as so exhausted that He conld sleep through all the uproar of a storm on the lake. And now He was willing to allow his burdened and complaining body a little rest. "But," as Chrysostom has it, "the ointment betrays itself." And He whose "name was as ointment poured forth " could not be hid. This Syrophoenician woman, though brought up in both an alien nation and religion, had heard of Him. Where or how she came to the keenness of spiritual insight and strength of faith she soon betrays, we are not informed. It is reasonable to suppose also that the Master knew of her. He who perceived in Perea that Lazarus had died in Bethany (John 11: 11-11), may well have been no stranger to this good woman, even before He met her. Matt. 15 : 21-28, and Mark 6 82 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. She lias left, it appears, in her home a daughter possessed by a devil. Day after day the wretched mother has sat beside the child in silent, help- less anguish, "Love watching madness with unalterable mien." But now the wonder-working Healer of disease has come. She has heard of his power and compassion. She has been told of demons that had scoffed at all other exorcists, but had heard from Him the voice of a master and obeyed. Xot a moment is to be lost. He never came her way before — may never come again. He will hear her cry, as He has heard a thousand cries, with relief and gladness in his answer. But now a strange, dark mystery. He answers her not a word. What can be the meaning of it? Does He despise her as a heathen? Are all the reports of Him false? Or is his power only a lying invention? At this point the disciples interpose. "Send her away, for she crieth after us." They speak in no better spirit, apparently, than that of the godless judge in the parable: "I will avenge her, lest by her continual coming she weary me." The disciples are tired of the woman and would gladly be rid of her. But still the Master keeps his silence. He will not speak the word of relief. "I am not sent," He replies to them, "but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." A rebuff that comes like a cruel blow to the sad woman's hopes. CHEIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 83 Not a syllable yet spoken to her. Not a syllable of sympathy for her. Only cold, hard words, which possibly she overhears. Bnt still, like a bird driven back seaward by harsh winds from the shore, yet straggling with tired wings for shelter, she holds on and holds out. Close to his feet she comes, and kneel- ing to look up into his face, she cries, "Lord, help me!" He replies as if his heart were turned to stone, "Let the children first be fed. It is not meet to take the children's bread and cast it to dogs!" 1 There is no hope. He scorns her as a heathen dog. He is a narrow, haughty, heartless Jew. But no — that cannot be. It is Jesus of Naz- areth! She watches Him more closely, kneel- ing there at his feet. Does she detect, through this disguise of bigotry and scorn, a glance from the true Jesus? The keen insight of faith ! The quick wit of inspired humility! "Truth, Lord," I am a pagan dog : and therefore I claim the blessing; for "the dogs eat of the crumbs that fall from their master's table." "She snares the Lord," says Luther, "in his own speech." And now He lets drop the disguise. Like Joseph, when ruler in Egypt, first sternly re- 1 Kwdpia, literally, "little dogs." Some interpreters have seen in. this a mitigation of the harshness of our Lord's repulse. Others have thought it an aggravation, as more contemptuous than "doss," without the diminutive. There is apparently little ground for either view. But the word is certainly harsh— was intended to be— as part of the test to which our Lord was putting the Syro- phcenician's faith. As Trench remarks ("■'Miracles." p. 275), the nobler qualities of the dog are nowhere recognized in Scripture. 84 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. pelling his brethren till he can learn what man- ner of men they hare become in his long absence, and then revealing himself to welcome them with open arms, the Lord Jesns shows the love that lay hidden behind this harsh rebuff. "O woman! great is thy faith! For this saying, go thy way. The devil is gone out of thy daugh- ter." The use He makes of silence is as beautiful as anything in all Scripture. A lapidary spends small pains on any common stone. The stone might crack and fly in fragments; or, if fin- ished, might not pay for the labor on it. But when some priceless diamond in the rough comes into his hands, he cuts and grinds and files and shapes and polishes, till the full beauty of the brilliant is brought out. So there were weaklings whom our Lord could take through no such discipline of exclusiveness and mystery and repulsion. To the leper He replied at once, "I will ; be thou clean I" 1 At the gate of Xain, amidst the widow's woe over the dead form of her son, before she asks for sympathy, "Young man, I say unto thee, arise!" 2 To the impotent man at Bethesda, without waiting for a prayer for healing, " Arise, take up thy bed and walk." So, in other instances, the feeble faith of some could stand no strain of delay. "The bruised reed He would not break, or quench the 1 Matt 8:3. 2 Luke 7 : 14. CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER, 85 smoking flax." But this Syrophoenician wo- man was neither reed nor flax. Her faith was strong. Her spiritual sight was keen. So the Master folds in his loye and yeils it over. He brings out the beauty and power of her trust in Him. He holds it up, honored and glorified, to the world's admiration to the end of time, that no sad soul, hard pressed and long waiting, may eyer despair. V. There are lessons, also, in the acts of our Lord, when He is not by word of mouth directly teaching. Dr. Horace Bushnell 1 beautifully sketches his sleep on the fisher's boat. "No wild- est tumult without can reach the inward com- posure of his rest. The rain beating on his face, and the spray driving across it, and the sharp gleams of the lightning and the crash of the thunder and the roar of the storm and the screams of the men, not all of them can shake Him far enough inward to reach the center where sleep lodges and waken Him to conscious- ness." What a suggestion here, though indi- rectly, of the energy with which He labored to bless men. Believing the body and comforting the soul of every sufferer, to his own worn body He is a pitiless master, incessantly demanding from it, " Give, give, more work for the lame, deaf, blind and leprous and possessed, more teaching for the benighted multitudes!" till it sinks on the deck of the little vessel, utterly exhausted and worn out. 1 Christ and his Salvation, p. 140. 86 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. "What a suggestion, too, of eagerness for ser- vice, even at fearful cost (Mark 10 : 32), in Ms going before the disciples on his way to Geth- seniane and the cross! In his three months in Jerusalem the Jews had plotted to assassinate Him, had twice mobbed Him, had once issued an order for his arrest, 1 and had been fired, by the raising Lazarus, to still more desperate rage. 2 ^To wonder that the disciples, as they fol- low Him while He presses on before them in the way, are amazed and afraid. How searching and pathetic a rebuke to any one of us inclined to complain of too many demands for Christian work, too many calls on his purse ! Another act of Jesus, which seems at first reading insignificant, is fruitful in suggestion. Sitting ("wearied," again, as on the fisher's boat) by the well-side, He says to the dissolute Samaritan woman, "Give me to drink." 3 He 1 John 7 : 19-32 ; 8 : 59 ; 10 : 31-39. 2 John 11 : 45-50. 3 John 4:7. Some most interesting points in the conversation that follows are noted by Trench " Synonyms of the N. T., on aireo. The woman in her reply, " How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink," etc., uses curew which, like the Latin peto, implies a peti- tion from an inferior to a superior. She evidently, at first, looks on Jesus as a friendless wanderer. But He, in his rejoinder, care- fully avoids the use of her word and the concession it would in- volve. '• If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink;" then, proceeding, He significantly adopts her word, " thou wouldst have asked of Him, and He would have given thee living water." Instead of supposing thyself supe- rior, thou wouldst have acknowledged thine inferiority to Him. Cremer, in his lexicon, remarks that Trench (who is supported bv Bengel, and bv Webster in " Syntax and Synonyms of the X. T.") "wrongly limits the use of aiTeiw,wken he says that, like the Latin peto, it is submissive and suppliant : as many examples of the opposite might be quoted: Deut. 10:12; Acts 16:29; etc." It is true that, in Deut. 10 : 12, " And now Israel, what doth the Lord thy God require of thee," alrelTai can have no such suppliant meaning. Also, Acts 16 : 29, where the jailer " called for a light," must be conceded to Cremer. Perhaps, too, he would claim Luke 1 : 63, where Zacharias asks for a writing-table. Another instance, (Ephes. 3 : 13), " I desire that ve faint not at my tribulations," is not so clear. It would be quite like the great apostle, in his meekness CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 87 asks a favor. And nothing so gratifies and con- ciliates a person in humble life as to be solicited for a favor that he can easily grant. Jesus understood human nature. And his methods of approaching those whom He sought to bene- fit are a study in themselves. Another suggestive act of our Lord is the re- moval of the hired mourners from the room where lay the dead maiden. (Mark 5 : 40.) It is easy to imagine how utterly repulsive to his sensitive nature must have been these charla- tans ("skillful in lamentation/' Amos 5:16), howling like dervishes, and as hollow-hearted as the "sounding brass and clanging cymbals" which aided in the uproar they made. He came to be, not a perfect man, but a perfect human being. All the finest qualities of both sexes were harmoniously blended in Him. As no man ever equalled Him in the sterner, masculine and gentleness, to adopt toward his brethren a word generally used by an inferior. But airelv is used in the New Testament, no less than seventy- one times. And in every instance, with the above few possible exceptions, it is in a request made to a superior. The following examples are taken at random : Matt. 5 :42 ; Mark 6 :22 ; Luke 11 :9 ; John 15 :7 ; Acts 12 :20. A usus so uniform could be no matter of accident. Thayer's lexicon (sub verbo) asserts that Prof. Ezra Abbott proves, in the N. Am. Review (1872, p. 182), that Trench is wrong. Not so. Dr. Abbott, who makes atrew occur seventy-one times, says only, "The following passages must, at least, be regarded as exceptions, and may suggest a doubt as to the distinction asserted." He adds no exceptions to those above cited but I. Cor., 1 : 22, " the Jews ask for signs," and I. Pet., 3 : 15, "everyone that asketh of you a reason of the hope that is in you." Allowing both these, they would make five, at most six, instances, out of seventy-one. Dr. Abbott did well to speak cautiously. Another suggestive point, though a little aside from our line of discussion is that to the Samaritan woman's first reply to our Lord we find no "Sir" prefixed. The omission corresponds to her presumptuous use of alrelv. But in her second reply, struck by the words of Jesus, "If thou knewest who it is," etc., as well as, probably, by the unconscious dignity of his manner, she com- mences with "Sir," or "Lord," *vpie. 88 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. virtues, so no woman in the refined sensibility with which He shrank from everything un- seemly, everything spurious and false. In the rude age and land in which He had chosen to live He had, from such sources, trials to endure that rarely occur to us. There could hardly be a more striking scene than this of the Master standing in his majestic calmness, be- fore pronouncing the almighty word that was to raise the dead, with these tragic harlequins jeering and scoffing around Him. The intense significance of that other act (Luke 22 : 61) in the court of the high priest, when "the Lord turned and looked upon Peter" swearing to his falsehood, and the apostle "felt how awful goodness is," we pass with no vain attempt at description. Instances in which there was a startling power in the very appearance of Jesus, in which the hidden divinity must have shone through the lowly exterior, the reader can study for himself in Matt. 21 : 12; Mark 9 : 15; Luke 1 : 20, 30; John 7: 41-16; 18: 6. VI. There is suggestion in our Lord's con- stant citation of the Old Testament Scriptures. For one reason this is specially remarkable. Being Himself the Truth, as well as the Way and the Life, He was, independently of Scrip- ture, an infallible source of instruction. Also, as introducing the New Economy, which was to sweep away so large a portion of the require- CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 89 ments of the Old, had He referred less than He does to the latter He might not have surprised us. And yet, in driving out the traders from the temple (Mark 11 : 17), in replying to the cavil of the scribes about the resurrection (Mark 12 : 20), when tempted by Satan (Matt. 4 : 1-11), on the way to Emmaus (Luke 24 : 27), almost everywhere and at all times, He is bringing in some utterance of Moses, the Psalms, or the Prophets. Is there no lesson here for preachers of our time? They have too often been content with "motto texts" — texts which are simply figure- heads to a sermon. One old New England divine is reported to have said that he "wanted nothing from a text but to get a subject out of it." There was formerly much of that style of discourse. But more recently the sermon is the direct child of the Scriptures. It lies on the bosom of Scrip- ture and draws its life from that. It becomes, in consequence, less technical and formal. It has greater variety, richness, freshness of thought. VII. But various lessons our Lord taught by his miracles of healing. We have seen some- thing of these in the story of the Syrophoenician woman. Quite as striking is that of the woman with the issue of blood. And, equally with that, it seems to call for special notice. When a man has been placed on an insula- 00 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. ting stool and then thoroughly charged with electricity, one may, with a tonch of the hnger, draw off from any part of his person a share of the mysterious fluid. It may be done with- out his wish or knowledge. He may be slyly approached from behind. The electricity is not in his will, but in his body. And his body will communicate it through a touch. So this woman evidently supposes the healing power to be in Christ. Tormented with a cruel disease, which is slowly wearing out her life, she expects to find Him so overflowing with the curative virtue that it saturates even his garments. She means to steal, from behind, some share of this virtue with a touch, and then to make off with her blessing before He is aware. Her whole notion,- of course, is a delusion. There is a large alloy of superstition mixed with the gold of her faith. And, had our Lord been as narrow and harsh as too many a servant of his through the ages since, He would have bid- den her begone with her wretched conceit and to wait for a cure till she had learned how to approach Him. But not so the gracious Master. The poor woman's body is to be healed and her soul instructed. But the healing comes first. To ask her to come out, while diseased and doubt- ing and trembling, with a full disclosure of her sad condition, would have been too stern a test for her feeble faith. He will take a gentler way. CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 91 He honors at once this dim-sighted, supersti- tious faith of hers. He falls in, for the moment, with her way for the healing. Quick as an electric flash, and thrilling as that, the throb of returning health runs through her nerves and startles her with a vigor never known for many a weary year before. Now she can stand the test of exposure. "The joy of the Lord is her strength. " Now, not till now, the Master turns with his searching question, "Who touched my clothes?" The magical virtue in his clothing, as the woman supposes, has had its effect. The Master knows nothing of what has been done. She will hide within her own bosom the gladdening secret and escape with it undivulged. But the Lord cannot let her evade Him with- out a better and more lasting blessing than she had in her thought. Her renewed, invigorated body will, ere many years, be mouldering in the dust. Into the undying soul, therefore, Jesus will throw new life and light. "Who touched my clothes?" is his persistent question. Peter, of course and as usually, wiser than his Master, thinks the question absurd. "The multitude throng Thee and press Thee," he cries, "and say- est Thou, Who touched me?" But Jesus is not to be baffled in his loving search for this daughter of Abraham. "Though many had thronged," says an old interpreter, "only one had touched Him." Through the contact of the 92 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. others went out no stream of blessing; through that of the woman passed life for the dying. When, in a flutter of mingled joy and awe, she comes out to fall down before Him and tell all the truth, the word follows which is to glow to her latest day in her memory: "Daughter, be of good comfort : thy faith hath saved thee. Go in peace." "I knew," that is, "who was behind me. I knew how feeble and benighted was thy hope. It was no magic in my garment, but my love for thee, in response to thy faith, that has cured thee. Xot only trust and be healed in the body, my daughter. Believe and be saved in the soul." The whole beautiful narrative shows the use and value of an immature, ignorant faith. It teaches at how low a point in darkness and error the Lord Jesus is able and eager to lay hold on a soul. Again, take the account of the palsied man (Matt. 9 : 1-8). In all his wretched helpless- ness he is laid by his Mends, on his pallet, be- fore the Master. They desire nothing so much as the sovereign word of cure. But how indif- ferent seems the Lord to his sad condition! For some time not a syllable of relief from it falls from his lips. There is no sign reported of sympathy Avith his sufferings. There is not a trace of recognition of them in any way. Yet, while the man is still lying unrelieved, Jesus cries to him, "Son, be of good cheer!" What, CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 93 to most of the bystanders, could this have seemed but irony? Jesus evidently intended to intimate, as well to them as to him, that the body is nothing — that, even if cured of its ail- ments, it soon goes to the dust — and that the soul is the jewel within the casket. "Thy sins be forgiven thee!" That great de- liverance, He will have all present understand, may well thrill one with gladness, however palsied and distressed the outward frame. It is not till after the charge of blasphemy from the Pharisees, and the necessity of vindi- cating his Divine prerogative in the forgiveness of sins, that He pays any attention at all to the body of the sufferer. Even then He brings in the miracle only incidentally. ' ' Now, "He seems to say, "since I have granted this poor sinner the greatest boon conceivable, in the forgiveness of his sins, if you count the little matter of the healing of his body of so much moment, before dismissing him I will attend to that." The man- ner of the miracle is every way as instructive as the miracle itself. VIII. Our Lord's way of startling his hearers by paradoxes and solecisms is remarkable. "Whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life" (John 6 : 54). "She is not dead, but sleepeth" (Matt. 9 :24). "Destroy this tem- ple, and in three days I will raise it up " (John 2 : 19). These and like utterances sometimes seem as if He cared for nothing so much as to 04 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. rouse the dull minds around Him and bolt them into some activity of thought on the great themes He handled. There is danger to the preacher, of course, in following this example, that he may ran into sensationalism and extravagance. But nothing of much value is to be had without danger. And without more or less of this style of speech the preacher is exposed to a more serious danger — that of inattention and indifference to his words. IX. The dramatic skill with which Jesus makes the characters in his parables speak, each one like himself, is admirable. Take, for exam- ple, the two sons bidden by their father to go into the vineyard. (Matt. 21 : 28.) The father uses, as in the story of the prodigal, the filial title "Son." This is an intimation both of his rightful authority and that he commands not as a heartless task-master. But the first son, who represents the reckless, defiant publican or sinner, answers without the corresponding "Father." His surly reply is short, sharp, and decisive: "I will not!" x But his brother is a true Pharisee — a model of hollow, unmeaning obsequiousness. "I go, Sir." 2 He lays great stress on the "I." It is like him who prays in the temple. "I thank Thee that I am not as other men." "I fast twice 1 Or rather, as, in contrast with his brother, lie omits the iyu>. it is " Will not '* (ov M u ). He puts all force into his rebellious will. 2 eyw, icvpie. CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 95 in the week. I give tithes of all that I get." Again, the "go" is not a word used by this hypocritical son. It is thrown in by the trans- lators. The son omits it, apparently to give more prominence to the "I." And finally the "sir," which his rongh brother omits, he deferentially inserts. His reply is, "I, sir!" "I am the model son, who knows the respect due to a father." And his sycophancy ends in words. So is it with the Rich Fool (Luke 12 : 17-19). What fine irony in making him congratulate his soul on having a store of luxuries for the palate! As if one, reversing the process, were to feed the body on the nutriment of the soul — on grand ideas and hopes and aspirations. How absolute a fool he is! And with what tragic power comes in the voice of God, "This night thy soul," for which thou hast provided thy dainties, "shall be required of thee!" — to startle him from his fatuous dream. Again, in the parable of the Pounds (Luke 19 : 12-27), as contrasted with that of the Talents (Matt. 25 : 14-30), there are lessons in che bearing and acts of the characters intro- duced. In the latter parable, the several ser- vants have different sums entrusted to them, five talents, two, and one, with, of course, different grades of responsibility. When then they ren- der accounts, their master addresses him who with five talents, has gained five more, in the words, "Well done, good and faithful servant; 96 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. thou hast been faithful oyer a few things; I will set thee over many things; enter thou into the joy of thy lord." Then comes he who has doubled his two tal- ents. He has brought to his master less than half what his brother has earned. But relatively to his ability he has done precisely the same. Not only, therefore, does he receive the same reward, that of entering into the joy of his lord, however much or little this may mean, but it is conveyed to him, syllable for syllable, in the same words. The verse which contains it, one of the very longest in the whole parable, cannot have been so carefully repeated by the Great Teacher without an object. Jesus plainly meant to stamp deep into our conviction the truth that God is no respecter of persons, that the humblest, lowliest disciple, if equally faithful with his eminent brother, shall have, to the last particle, as large and rich reward as he. But turn, now, to the parable of the Pounds. Here the amounts entrusted to the servants are not, as the talents, unequal. But each receives, like every other, one pound. And in the reckoning, after the lord's return, he who has multiplied his pound ten-fold has an "en- trance ministered unto him abundantly" into his master's favor. Hear the welcome, "Well done, thou good servant! Because thou wast found faithful in a very little, have thou author- ity over ten cities." Almost every word is praise. CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 9? The utterance blooms and shines along the lines with commendation. But how with him who, with the same ability and opportunity, has been but half as faithful? He has gained but five pounds. How different the Lord's answer to him! No long- verse repeated, as to the servant who had earned two talents. Not a word of commendation now. No "well done!" for him as for his brother. No "thou good and faithful servant!" for him. No "because thou wast found faithful in a very little." He had received more than a very little. And short and abrupt is the answer, "Be thou also over five cities." He is "saved so as through fire." 1 In the parable of the Pharisee and the publi- can at the temple, what keen irony (in view of his offering not a single request or petition) in saying, "The Pharisee prayed thus with him- self'! The publican's plea, on the other hand "God be merciful to me a sinner!" is all peti- tion. And, with downcast eyes and hands beat- ing his breast, he strives, in the intensity of his feeling, to find a tongue in every limb. X. Our Lord is remarkable for his word-pic- tures. Like a true artist, He never paints with- out a background. He looks well to the lights and shades. He puts truths and facts by comparison. 1 These significant distinctions, as well as the "entrance ministered abundantly " and the " saved as through fire" (escaping from a house on fire), indicate far greater differences of reward in heaven, far more occasion for regret on the part of self-indulgent Christians, there, than most Bible readers imagine. 98 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. To warn Ckorazin of the giddy height and tremendous peril of her privilege, He points her to Sodom and Gomorrah (Matt. 11:21), which, with her light, would have long ago repented in sack-cloth and ashes. To rebuke the churl- ish ruler of the synagogue, canting about the Sabbath, he contrasts the poor woman, delivered from a demon, with the sheep released from a pit on the Sabbath day. (Matt. 12 : 11.) In cheering his disciples with the assurance of their Father's protection and care, He reminds them of Him who feeds even the fowls of the air, and clothes with more than the splendor of Solomon, the lilies of the field. (Matt. G:26- 29.) That He may raise the standard of char- acter among his disciples, He takes, as the foil on which to exhibit the righteousness He re- quires, that of the scribes and Pharisees (Matt. 5:20). Though despised and rejected of men, He reminds those around Him, with the assur- ance, "A greater than Solomon is here,' 1 (Matt. 12 : 12) of the transcendent majesty of his per- son. There is in all this a rhetorical suggestion for the young preacher. He comes upon many a great truth which, because it is great, has been so often repeated as to seem threadbare. He is at a loss how to give it so fresh an utterance as will hold attention. Let him remember that a painter often brings out a figure, not by touch- ing it at all, but by darkening its surroundings. CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 99 Let the young preacher paint a background, show a contrast, to his thought. So he may easily throw it out into new and more vivid light. XI. The style of our Lord in public speech is at other points instructive. It abounds in hints as to "the art of xuitting things." Every student of rhetoric is aware how superior in vivacity and energy is the metaphor to the simile. It is more forcible to call an extortioner a shark than to say that he acts like a shark — to declare that a good woman is an angel, than that she is like an angel. JS'ow our Lord's style of speech wonderfully abounds in metaphor. A tame speaker might have said that He was the source of sacred truth to men. Jesus says, "I am the light of the world." The unskilled preacher might have reminded believers that they were a preserva- tive element among men. Jesus says, "Ye are the salt of the earth." So, "I am the good shep- herd," "I am the door," "I am the vine; ye are the branches," "I am the bread of life." The objection to metaphor is, that it is liable to obscurity and misapprehension. But often, even at the risk of that, Jesus adheres to it. For instance, in the beautiful metaphors (John 10 : 1-5) of the shepherd, the sheep, the porter, and the fold, "they understood not what things they were which He spake unto them." He is obliged to come out more plainly with his meaning. 100 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. Jesus had peculiar modes of illustration. He often unfolded a great principle, not so much by taking analogies from animate or inanimate nature as by selecting a special instance, a con- crete application, of the principle itself, and, with wonderful power, picturing and pressing that home on the souls around Him. Instead of enjoining meekness in general terms, He says "If a man smite thee on the one cheek, turn to him the other also." Urging philanthropy, He says, "From him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away." Instead of asking, in general, what father would refuse favors to his children, He demands, "If a son ask bread of any of you that is a father, will he give him a stone?" Instead of forbidding uncharitable judgments, with what vividness He puts it: "Why beh oldest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, and considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?" (Matt. 7 : 3). As Wkately remarks, too, this is an excel- lence in style which, without loss of power, cam be translated into other tongues. The eloquence of many a fine rhetorician, rendered into a foreign language, is like the golden clouds of sunset condensed into a spatter of water drops. Macaulay says of "Paradise Lost," that not a word could be altered or displaced without injury to the poem. But the wonderfully effective style of Jesus is essentially the same in any CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 101 human tongue. Is it hard to see a Divine prescience in all this? XII. Jesus illustrates, not only with familiar speech, but from familiar objects. The wine, the sheep, the tree, the nets, the bargains in the market-place, the lost coin in the house, the wine- skins with their contents, the salt losing its savor, the servant called in from feed- ing cattle, the sower and his seed, the wheat and the tares, the plowman looking back from the plow, the leaven, the mustard- seed, the importunate widow and the judge — all are made to move as in a panorama before us, each with its golden lesson. So each of these objects becomes, in its turn, a preacher eloquent in its silence, to remind disciples of their Master's words and to speak in his name long after He has passed away. The salt that has lost its savor becomes a savor unto life, and the barren fig-tree bears such fruit as never hung- on tree before. Again, Jesus was no indifferent observer of the events of his time. From them, as from other il- lustrations,He drew lessons of wisdom. He warns the disciples against the foul influence of Herod. (Mark 8 : 15.) He cautions them against the exam- ples of the scribes. (Matt. 23: 3.) He admonishes them to draw no hasty inference as to the guilt of them whose blood Pilate mingled with their own sacrifice (Luke 13:2, 3), or them on whom had fallen the tower in Siloam. (Luke 13 : 4.) 102 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. He teaches Christian duty toward the Ko- nian emperor (Matt. 22:21). He shows himself abreast of the times, awake to what goes on around Him and to the duties which flow ont of the hour that is passing. Here, too, there is a lesson for the pulpit of our time. Not that the preacher should secular- ize himself or his work. Xot that, from a mere temporal point of view, he should deal with mere temporal interests. But the grandest truths of Christianity lie often in close connection with the passing events of the time. They look out, with fresh light and meaning in their faces, through these events. Prof. Phelps, of Andover, records the x>owerful impression made by a Boston pastor, at the time of the conviction and execution of Prof. Webster of Harvard College, by drawing from that event lessons as to retribution. XIII. The parable was pre-eminently the beauty and glory of our Lord's way of teaching. ''Without a parable spake He nothing unto them. (Matt. 13:34) A parable is very precarious ground on which to build any great doctrine of Scripture. A doc- trine which is taught elsewhere in literal speech, we may recoguize as re-appearing in one of these beautiful pictures. But where and how far the imagery of the parable represents literal fact is no easy matter to decide. The use of the story is not so much to teach CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 103 any new doctrine as to illustrate and enforce what is elsewhere taught. It appeals, like an allegorical painting, to the imagination. It is rather for suggestion and impression than for information. And the suggestive richness of it is largely due to the fact that it faces, with different incidental meanings, in various direc- tions. In Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, which might be regarded as a sort of modified and extended parable, what is the meaning of the "Valley of the Shadow of Death"? To one reader it means a time of deep spiritual gloom; to another, of terrible bereavement that left him alone in the world; to another, of heavy reverses that swept away his livelihood. The dismal Valley serves indifferently for any or all these trials. And because it does, it is far richer in themes for thought than a baldly literal statement of truth. The right view of analogies between the material creation and moral truth, we conceive to be that they are no accident. They are not in- genious inventions. They were divinely in- wrought in the plan of creation itself. The world is a vast diagram drawn to shadow forth truth. Take, for example, the relation of parent to child. What could be more superficial than to suppose it instituted solely for the perpetuation of the human species? How easily that might have been accomplished by direct creation, as of Adam in Eden! But the plan of God was 101 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. evidently first to bring ns into the world, in a helpless infancy, from human parents; and then, when with every tendril of our being we have clung to an earthly father, when a thousand endearing memories and associations have sanctified the word father, God comes in to proclaim Himself the Infinite Father and invite us to a childlike trust in Him. So again, the solid bulk and weight of things in the visible creation, controlled as it is by such ethereal, unseen forces as gravitation, animal and vegetable life, heat, light, electric currents — what room for question that all this was originally designed of God to shadow forth "the invisible things of Him" which are "clearly seen in things that do appear"? All nature, in short, is a vast and infinitely varied system of diagrams, or object-lessons, with spiritual uses of suggestion and instruction inwoven with its material laws. But Jesus, in his illustrations of truth, goes even farther than this. He finds "a soul of good in things evil." His parables are remarkable for the suggestions they draw from the selfish- ness, the cruelties, the iniquities in general, of men. Sometimes the parable, as the one which is the main theme of this volume, touches the truth illustrated at many points of contact. But again it has, as in these analogies from the sins and crimes of men, hardly more than one such point. CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 105 Thus, froni the story of the Unjust Steward (Luke 16:1-9) we learn only that we are wisely to make provision, not only for the life that now is, but for that to come. The parable of the Un- just Judge (Luke 18 :l-8) is simply a dark back- ground on which to paint the contrasted loye of God for his people. In the parable of the Un- merciful Servant (Matt. 18:23-35), whose lord commands him and his wife and children all to be pitilessly sold into slavery, Jesus, without intending to ascribe to God such cruelty and injustice toward the innocent as this, is only warming an unforgiving soul of its peril. When the man finding a treasure hid in the field (Matt. 13 : 44), instead of honestly report- ing it to the rightful owner or his heirs, hides it again, and selling all that he has, buys the field for himself, the only lesson is that we must make any sacrifice for the priceless treas- ure of immortal life. 1 This method, as a whole, of extracting good from evil falls in with the Divine policy of making the wrath of man to praise Him. "My Father worketh hitherto and I work." It hints 1 The parable of the Leaven (Matt. 13 : 33 and Luke 13 : 21) also seems to illustrate our Lord's way of extracting; pood from evil. In the Old Testament, leaven, as implying fermentation and incipient decay, is used as a symbol of depravity. The only appar- ent exceptions are Lev. 7:13, 23:17; and Amos 4:5. The first two instances are those of the consecration of the first-fruits of the bread made from the new wheat. It was such bread as was eaten in the households. The instance in Amos is indignant irony against those who worship false gods with offerings of leaven, in the New Testament leaven typifies moral corruption. It must have been, through the training of centuries, associated in the Jewish mind with sin. It is quite remarkable, therefore, that Jesus, in the parable, should have made it a type of moral purity. 106 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. to us, also, that in all Christian effort, whether of instruction or of securing help for Christian ends, we are to make the best use possible even of evil men. XIV. Our Lord, in his teaching, drew out from his hearers the expression of their own thought. He quickened in that war their mental activity in receiving the truth. Question and answer was largely his method. He endorsed the Socratic method. The following- are examples: Matt. 9:2,8; 17:25; 20:22; 21:25-31. Mark 8:27-29; 10:3. Luke 10:26, 36. And often, as we saw above (VIII), He threw his thought into such paradoxes as, even more effectually than questions, would stimu- late the mind. Question and answer, in the delivery of ser- mons, are, of course, impracticable. But a far larger share than has been common, of the attention of the pulpit, ought to be given to the children of the congregation. With them this method is indispensable. It is the easiest way of holding their attention. It impresses truth deep on the memory. It will, better than any other method, awaken the mind to activity. The saying applies to these little hearers under in- struction, as fully as elsewhere, that "it is more blessed to give than to receive." The entire subject of illustration in public address is one as to which the discourses of Jesus are rich in suggestion. It is a subject which our CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 107 liomiletical teachers have strangely neglected. Two bulky octavo volumes on sacred rhetoric, of more than 600 octavo pages each, occur to us, in neither of which is more than two pages given to this whole matter. 1 ^ot so the Great Teacher. As to this excellence in his methods, no less than as to others, "never man spake like this Man!" It was with various objects and aims that He resorted to illustration. I. For explanation of a truth. When the Pharisees and Herodians, hoping to compass his destruction, ask whether or not to pay tribute to Caesar, how clearly, with a coin as an object-lesson, He sets the case before them: "Whose is this image and superscription?" "Caesar." "Kender, therefore, to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." By the very stamp, that is, which you put on your money you acknowledge the emperor's authority. Act, then, as to the matter of tribute, accordingly. Again, after the question why his disciples do not, like those of John the Baptist, fast, when explaining that the liberty of the Christian Economy cannot be imprisoned within old Jew- ish rites, how happy his illustrations (Matt. 9:16, 17) of the folly of that! The new cloth must not be sewed into the old garment. It 1 Prof. F. W. Fish's "Manual of Preaching," which devotes to illustration an entire chapter, indicates an advance toward a fuller appreciation of the subject. 108 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. would only, by tearing away the edges, enlarge the rent. The new wine must not be ponred into the old skins. Its vigorous ferment would soon burst them. One such illustration is worth, for explanation, a whole treatise. So, when the Jews charge Jesus with casting out demons through the prince of the demons, He asks (Matt. 12:29), "How can one enter into the house of the strong man and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man?" How could I snatch his victims from Satan if I had not a supernatural power over Satan? The commonest of the people could see, if the Pharisees could not, the point and force of that question. Once more, listening to his explanation why bad men must be allowed, for the present, to live amongst the good, the dullest disciple would see how the roots of the tares become entangled with those of the wheat — how, lest the wheat be uprooted, they must be suffered to grow with it till the harvest. II. Jesus used illustration for impressing such truth as needs little or no explanation. What power for that purpose in Nathan's touch- ing story (II Sam. 12:1-7) of the ewe lamb! How tame and weak, in comparison, would have been a direct complaint to David of his infa- mous treatment of Uriah! When the prophet had first gathered a storm of just indignation in the king against the imaginary rich man CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. 109 oppressing Ms poor neighbor, and then turned the point of it round against the king himself, it might well pierce within him the fountain of contrition and tears. In Matt. 8: 19, 20, where one who, if we may judge from the reply of Jesus, was governed by self-interest, 1 offers to follow our Lord, it would have been a feeble reply for the Master to say that He was poor. But the illustration, with its pathetic contrast — how absolute a destitution it pictures : " The foxes have holes and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head." No mercenary for- tune-hunter would travel far along the road which led to that. Again, to preach a homily on the sovereign right of God to allot to his creatures, who of right can claim nothing, such conditions as seem to Him best, might have wearied many and convinced none. But when, in the parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard (Matt. 20: 1-16), the employer had paid all for which the men engaged in the morning had agreed, every hearer would see that he was entitled, if he chose, to give to those who had toiled but an hour an equal sum. III. For awakening sympathy Jesus uses many a touching illustration. The Good Samar- itan, the Lost Sheep, the Prodigal Son, have 1 The man probably expected Jesus to set up a temporal king- dom and reign in splendor. Like James and John (Marft 10 : 37), he was apparently an office-seeker. 110 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. moved men of every generation to tears. In another case, the reply of the people (Matt. 21 : 41), "He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard nnto other husbandmen," shows how Jesus, like Xathan the prophet, actually moved the indignation of his hearers against imaginary offenders who were simply the hearers' own reflections in a mirror. IV. Our Lord's different ways of introduc- ing illustrations will well reward study. This is a matter in which the average preacher, if he illustrate at all, often falls into monotony. "This subject may be illustrated as follows," or "Let us suppose a case for illustration," is enough to tire a hearer with what is coming before he has heard the first word of it. Jesus, on the contrary, illustrates sometimes by metaphor (Matt. 5 : 13, 14), sometimes by simile (Matt. 13 : 33; Luke 13 : 19), now by analogy, then by contrast (Matt. 11:21; Luke 18:1-8), now by assertion (Matt. 13 : 45), then by question (Matt. 7 :10; Luke 11 : 5), again, by an object-lesson (Matt. 18:2; Luke 5:10; 7:44). At times He draws out his fictitious narrative with no inti- mation, at first, of the uses to which He will apply it (Luke 8:5; 10:30). In some cases (Matt. 13:18-23, 37-42), He explains a para- ble. Often He leaves us to find for ourselves the application. Jesus was indeed, in Himself, in his whole CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. HI personality and mission, a grand visible illustra- tion of the unseen, eternal Godhead. It was as natural that exquisite word-pictures of truth should fall from his lips as that light should flow from the sun or fragrance from a grove of spices. He so marvelously shadowed forth, under visible forms, both the glory of the Divine nature and the lowliness of a perfect and suffer- ing humanity, that neither hostile Jews nor friendly disciples admitted to intimacy could comprehend Him. That the same Being, born of a virgin, throw- ing the shadow of mystery in advance, from even before his birth ; should be both "Wonder- ful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace," regnant in transcendent majesty, and also that, when we see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire Him, despised and rejected of men — is it any marvel that saint and seer alike, along the centuries of the older Economy, studied the mystery of his nature in vain? As one looks along the face of the famous cliff in the White Mountains for the outlines of that gigantic face, of which he has heard, he dis- covers nothing but angles and jags of rock jutting out in seemingly wild confusion. They have no form or comeliness. They appear to have nothing in common. But, going on, till, at a turn in the pathway, a finger-board signifi- cantly points upward, he looks again. And 112 CHRIST AS A PUBLIC TEACHER. there lie beholds, in clear, sharp relief against the azure, all these scattered crags and notches blending sublimely into the grandest semblance, perhaps, on the planet of the " human face divine." The ancient believers, searching what time or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ and the glories that should follow them, among all the scattered, incongruous features of his Messiah- ship, foretokened through the centuries, "found no end in wondering mazes lost." But when, in due time, was reached the exact, essential point of view, there showed these strange, isolat- ed features of his life, so long predicted, falling harmoniously into the one perfect and Divine humanity. What could such a Being be but the Way and the Truth, no less than the Life? If in Him dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead bodily (amazing words!), how inevitably shall we find in Him also, for the matter not only, but the manner as well, of DMne illustra- tion, an exhaustless study, an unfailing inspira- tion! ^^- ^'.^^k> N ^^■" iSRe ^7j£? SKr ..