METHOD o. rcier Class __i2)-^A3 — Book ^J^^- GopyiightN"- COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. Dr. Seaman A. Knapp THE KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON By W. B. MERCIER Agriculturist and Field Agent, U. S. Department of Agriculture and nr'E. SAVELY Agriculturist and Field Agent, U. S. Department of Agriculture Illustrated Garden City New York DOUBLEDAY, PAGE & COMPANY 1913 Copyright, 1913, by DOUBLEDAY, PaGE & CoMPANY All rights reserved, including that of translation into foreign languages, including the Scandinavian €'CI,A357105 TO THE LATE DR. SEAMAN A. KNAPP THIS WORK IS DEDICATED IN APPRECIATION OF HIS GREAT SERVICE TO THE COTTON FARMERS OF THE SOUTH PREFACE In the preparation of this book it has been the aim of the authors to give in concise form a practical treatise on Cotton, instructive to the cotton grower. The authors desire to express their thanks to the many friends who have assisted them in this work, and especially to the following: Messrs. B. L. Moss, J. A. Evans, and E. C. Ewing in reading the manuscript of certain chapters. In the preparation of this manu- script, we have consulted freely the publications of the State Experiment Stations and the U. S. Department of Agriculture; " Cotton, " by Burkett and Poe; "Southern Field Crops," by J. F. Duggar, and " Cyclopedia of Agricul- ture," Bailey. In the list of illustrations credit is given in detail to the U. S. Department of Agriculture, and to State Experiment Stations and others that contributed photographs for this volume. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Introduction. History of Cotton 3 II. Description of Cotton Plant . 13 III. Climate and Soils .... 23 IV. Cotton Culture 33 V. Fertilizers for Cotton ... 47 VI. Improvement of Cotton by Seed Selection 69 VII. Varieties of American Upland Cotton 79 VIII. Some Cotton Diseases and Insect Pests — • With Suggestions for Their Control 97 IX. Harvesting and Marketing Cotton 121 X. Cost of Cotton Production . . 135 XI. Equipment in Teams and Tools for Cotton Farms .... 145 XII. Cotton By-products .... 151 XIII. Soil Improvement on Cotton Farms 161 XIV. Outlook for the Cotton Industry 181 XV. The Supply and Distribution of Cotton 191 Supplement 197 is. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Dr, Seaman A. Knapp Frontispice ^ FACING PAGE Cutting Down the Expense of Making a Cotton Crop by Harrowing Young Cotton Across the Rows i8 {Courtesy of W. F. Haden) Breaking Three Acres a Day with Moldboard Plow 19 , {Farm Management, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) A Weeder in Use for Early Cultivation . . . . 19 {W. F. Haden) The Disc Cultivator 34 V The Modern Way — Ten Acres a Day . . 35 {Farm Demonstration Work, B, P. I., U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) The Way to Get a Deep Seed Bed 36 {Farm Demonstration Work, B. P. I., U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) A Terraced Field 37 {Farm Management U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Method of Making Broad Terrace 37 {Farm Management, U. S. Department of Agricul- ture) xii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PAGE Cultivating Cotton with a Spring Tooth Cultivator 48 {Farm Demonstration Work, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Cultivating Cotton with a Two-horse Cultivator . . 48 {Farm Demonstration Work, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Young Cotton Plants 49 {Fiber Investigations, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) Cotton Bolls 82 {Fiber Investigations, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) Open Bolls of Cotton 83 {Fiber Investigations, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) Varieties of Cotton: Sea Island, Rio Grande, Upland Long-staple, Upland 88 {Fiber Investigations, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) Varieties of Cotton: Bill Boll Group, King-like or Early Group, Cluster Group, Semi-cluster Group . 89 {Fiber Investigations, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) American Upland Cotton 92 {Fiber Investigations, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) Cotton Boll with Anthracnose 93 {Office of Plant Pathology, B. P. I., U. S. Depart- ment oj Agriculture) Root-knot on Cotton Plant 93 {Office of Plant Pathology, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS XIU FACING PAGE Map Showing Spread of Cotton Boll Weevil from 1892 to 1912 97 (Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) A Young Cottosn Plant Dying from Wilt ... 98 (Office of Plant Pathology, B. P. I., U. S. Department of Agriculture) A Typical Plant of Dillon Wilt-resistant Cotton . 99 (Office of Plant Pathology, B. P. I., U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) A Field of Upland Cotton in South Carolina Destroyed by Wilt 102 (Office of Plant Pathology, B. P. I., U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) Wilt-resistant Dillon Cotton on Adjoining Land Badly Infected with Wilt 102 (Office of Plant Pathology, B. P. I., U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) Moths of Cotton Boll- worm 103 (Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Pupa of Boll-worm in Its Underground Burrow . . 103 (Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- ' culture) Stages and Work of the Cotton Worm or Cotton Cater- pillar 104 (Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Cotton Plant Attacked by Boll Weevil .... 105 Cotton Boll-worm on Outside and Inside of Cotton Boll 108 (Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) xiv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PAGE Partly Opened Cotton Bolls Showing EflFects of Boll- worm Damage io8 {Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Injury by Boll Weevil to Bolls 109 {Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Effects of BoII-weevil Attack on Leaf and Squares . 112 {Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Poisoning Cotton by Pole and Bag Method . . . . 113 {Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) Poisoning Cotton by Use of Spray Pump . . . 113 {Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agri- culture) A Farmer Comparing His Cotton with the Government Standard Grades 128 {fF. T. Payne) Round Bales Showing Method of Opening . . . . 128 {Cotton Marketing, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Gin-compressed Bales Ready for Shipment . . . 128 {Cotton Marketing, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Gin-box, Egyptian, Gin-compressed and Recompressed Cotton Bales 129 {Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, Depart- ment of Commerce and Labor) Transverse Section of a Cotton Gin 136 {Continental Gin Company) LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS XV FACING PAGE Section from a Ginnery Showing Box Press and Gin Stands I37v,' {Continental Gin Company) Ordinary Equipment of One-horse Cotton Farm . . 146 (Farm Management, U. S. Department 0/ Agricul- ture) Ordinary Equipment of Two-horse Cotton Farm . . 146 {Farm Managemetit, U. S. Department of Agricul- ture) Up-to-date Equipment for a Cotton Farm . . . 147^ {Farm Management, U. S. Department of Agriculture) Crimson Clover in Central Alabama 1 76 Corn and Velvet Beans 176 A Yield of Two and One Half Bales Per Acre . . 177 {Farm Demonstration Work, B. P. /., U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture) History of Cotton CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION HISTORY OF COTTON COTTON is the world's greatest fiber crop. History records nothing that compares to it as a cash crop. The cotton crop is extensively grown in but twelve of the Southern States, and exceeds in total value any other crop in the United States, except corn, which is produced in each of the forty-eight states of the Union. The spinners of Europe are much more concerned about the size of the American cotton crop each fall than about the peace of nations. The cotton plant furnishes the raw material for the greatest textile industry of all times. The volume of the export trade it supports is enor- mous. Cotton has been known and perhaps used as fiber since the earliest civilization. The im- portant part it was to play in the economic 3 4 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON adjustment of the world's products and finances was not realized until after the American Revolution. Silk, flax, wool, and cotton have always been the staples to furnish mankind with clothing. By reason of the cheapness of production, the ease of manufacture, and the general excellence of the manufactured goods for wearing apparel, cotton is rapidly taking place of the other three materials. HISTORY The original home of the cotton plant has not been definitely established by historians, but from the best data at hand was probably the East Indies. Hindoo history, 4,000 years old, speaks of a fiber, evidently cotton, and leads us to believe it was manufactured into fabrics at this early period. Cotton has been known in the countries of southern Europe for several centuries. The early fragmentary history of various countries mention some plant bearing a wool-like fiber, which was undoubtedly cotton. Some species of cotton have been found growing wild in practically all countries lying between the 37th degree of latitude north and south of the equator except the present cotton area HISTORY OF COTTON 5 of the United States. Magellan found the Brazilians using cotton for beds and fabrics in 1519. The first record of its being grown as a fiber in the United States was in 1621, and then only in small quantities. Cotton seed was brought from the Barbadoes to South Carolina in 1680. The first foreign shipment of cotton from this country was from Savannah in 1747 — only three bags. There seems to have been so little grown that no authentic record of the crop was kept"until 1791, at which date the entire Ameri- can crop was 8,889 bales weighing 225 pounds each. The lint had to be separated from the seed by hand, which was a tedious and difficult task. The cotton gin was invented by Ely Whitney in 1793. The first saw gin was erected in South Carolina in 1795, and from this dates the beginning of an industry which, for rapidity and volume of growth, has no parallel in the world's history. The total crop of the United States in 1850 was, in round numbers, 2,500,000 bales. In i860 it reached 4,500,000 bales. Then the Civil War came on and so paralyzed all the 6 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON business industries of the South that it took almost two decades to get back to the produc- tion of i860. Since 1880 the increase has been continuous and rapid. The average yearly production, for the twenty-six years ending 1904 was 7,500,000 bales. The average for the past ten years has been 12,300,000 bales. The crop of 1911 was over 16,000,000 bales, the largest of any yet grown. The highest average prices for thirty years have been paid for the last five crops, averaging more than 12,000,000 bales each. The cotton mills of the world now handle more than 15,000,000 bales of cotton annually. Even with this enormous supply, it is claimed that half the people on the globe know nothing of modern-made cotton goods. One statistician has estimated that if all the people in the world used as much cotton goods as the civilized nations, it would take more than 40,000,000 bales to supply the demand. The progress of some of the most populous countries toward higher standards of living will doubtless cause the demand to grow faster than the supply unless there is some readjustment of labor conditions in cotton-producing countries. The United States has special advantages HISTORY OF COTTON 7 for cotton growing that perhaps are possessed by no other country. There exists a peculiar combination of soil and climatic conditions found in no other country, even where situated in the same degrees of latitude. Not all the lands lying between the 37th degrees of north and south latitude will produce cotton success- fully. Profitable production of cotton in any country is largely determined by conditions of soil, climate, labor, and management. America now furnishes about 75 per cent, of the cotton used by European spinners. Egypt, India, and Brazil, in the order named, supply the rest. Several other countries grow limited amounts, but unless better methods are used and a more rapid progress made, these countries will hardly produce more than enough for home consumption. The only chance of an early increase in supply for Euro- pean spinners must come from Egypt, and under the most favorable conditions the Increase from this source must be limited. All other cotton countries except America have found other crops more profitable, and It Is hardly probable that they will change to cotton merely to accom- modate the spinner. 8 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON There are vast possibilities for the extension of the cotton industry in the Southern States. In the strictly cotton-producing states there are 303,000,000 acres of land. Of this not over 100,000,000 have been put into cultivation. In recent years 28 to 36 million acres, or about one third, have been planted to cotton. This is about 9 per cent, of the total area of the cotton states. There are still vast areas avail- able for cotton production. It would appear from the above figures that the quantity that could be produced might be greatly increased by the utilization of all avail- able lands. There are, however, certain im- portant factors that will limit production. The problem of maintaining soil fertility; the adjustment of the labor problem, now a most serious one; and the increasing population with constantly advancing prices for other farm products will have a tendency to limit the acreage devoted to cotton. Again, it must be remembered that cotton is one of the most tedious and difficult crops to grow and harvest. It will always be hard to get those accus- tomed to growing other crops less troublesome to adopt cotton farming. This will be the case HISTORY OF COTTON 9 SO long as present high prices for other products exist. The present practice of growing cotton and buying from the proceeds the necessary supplies to run the farm is seldom profitable. About one third of the American crop is consumed in the United States, the remainder being exported. The estimated total value of the last two crops, including seed, is $l,ooo,- 000,000 each. This is a vast sum of money and should the Southern farmers make up their minds to grow this amount of cotton and in addition all the food supplies for man and teams, a thing that could easily be done, it would be only a question of a few years until the cotton farmers of the United States would be the most prosperous and independent of all men. Description of Cotton Plant CHAPTER II DESCRIPTION OF COTTON PLANT THE cotton plant belongs to what is known as the mallow family. The okra, hollyhock, althea, some weeds and trees belong to the same family. Cotton is a tropical plant and is found growing wild in most tropical countries. It is an annual in the United States; but after warm winters occasional stalks of the old crop start new growth, indicating the perennial nature of the plant. In this country it is usually a shrub-like plant, ranging from two to seven feet in height. The extent of growth naturally depends on soil, climatic conditions, variety, and general treatment. A peculiarity of the mallow family is that all plants in it have flowers with five petals with numerous stamens that form a tube about the pistil. There are usually several leaf-like parts below and around the flower. In cotton there 13 14 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON are three of these, which, with the inclosed bud, form what is termed the "square." The leaves are alternate, lobed, with veins all beginning at a common point near the base. The genus or general subdivision of the family to which cotton belongs is Gossypium. A number of species are classed under this sub- division, but only two of these are of special interest to the American cotton grower. The first, and one of the greatest importance, is Gossypium Hirsutum, which includes all the upland cottons both long and short staples. The second, Gossypium Barbadense, includes all the Sea Island and Egyptian cottons. As indicated above, American upland cotton may be divided into two distinct classes: (i) short staple, and (2) long staple varieties. The chief distinction between the two is in the length and strength of staple. The short staple ranges from three fourths to one and one eighth inches, while the long staple ordi- narily runs from one and three sixteenths to one and five eighths inches in length. There are, of course, several intermediate classes. The buy- ing and selling prices of long staple cotton are largely determined by the length of staple; the DESCRIPTION OF COTTON PLANT 1 5 highest price, of course, being paid for the longest. Cotton seed when planted germinate quickly under favorable conditions. The first stage in the growth of the young plant is the formation of a stem and tap root. When the young plant first appears above ground it has two leaves. With warm weather, plenty of plant food, and good treatment the plant develops rapidly. The plant has a central main stem from which are put forth limbs or branches. This stem and the branches are woody in nature and possess considerable strength. The first or base limbs are the largest and in many varieties assume the stalk-like qualities of the parent stem. The other branches decrease in length and size toward the top of the plant. When fully developed the plant usually presents a very symmetrical and pleasing appearance. The main stem and the larger base limbs produce only leaves and smaller sub-branches on which the bolls are found. One peculiarity of the cotton plant is that two limbs start from the axil of each leaf on the main stem. One con- tains the bolls and the other is barren; fre- quently, however, only one develops, and l6 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON fortunately this one is more often the fruit- bearing branch. The varieties or plants developing fruit limbs nearest the ground having short joints or nodes are found to reach maturity first; the long-jointed, straggling plants being invariably late in maturing. The stalks and stems are covered with a rather strong, tough bark, usually of a brownish color. This bark contains a coarse fiber, but it has never attained any commercial importance. Cotton leaves appear alternately on the stem and may vary in size or shape in the same variety and even sometimes on the same stalk. The upland cottons usually have leaves with three lobes, sometimes more. The big boll varieties have large heavy leaves with slight indentations and short lobes. The very small boll varieties have small, light leaves with deeper indentations and sharp, pointed lobes. Sea Island and Egyptian cottons have very deep indentations and slender lobes. There are usually three or more prominent veins in each leaf starting out from a common point at the leaf stem. The leaves and small stems of upland cottons are covered with short hair? DESCRIPTION OF COTTON PLANT IJ which are not found on the Sea Island vari- eties. A small flower stem of varying length appears along the larger branches to support the bolls. The square is the first stage of the fruit. It consists of three bracts or leaves with the inclosed flower bud and appears, on an average, twenty-one days before the bloom opens. The blooms of upland cotton are cream colored the first morning, changing to pink the second day, and fall to the ground the third or fourth day. The flowers open up beautifully early in the morning, but begin to close and change color in the afternoon of the first day. Blooms of other species vary in size and color. The cotton bloom is self fertile. When the bloom drops, it leaves a small pod about the size of a pea which develops, on an average, in from forty-five to fifty days into the full grown boll. This boll is similar in size and shape to a small hen's egg and contains the lint and seed. The boll of upland cottons has four to five divisions, each containing a lock consisting of seed and lint. Each lock has from six to twelve seeds. Sea Island bolls are smaller and contain three or four locks. 1 8 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON The number of bolls may vary from a very few to several hundred to the stalk. The num- ber depends largely on the variety, soil, moist- ure, and climatic conditions while growing. The number of blooms appearing does not signify how many bolls will reach maturity, as insect pests, excessive rains, dry weather, or lack of fertility may cause a large per cent, to shed. An average of thirty to fifty mature bolls to the stalk over a field with a good stand should give a yield of three quarters to one bale per acre. The size and shape of the boll varies with the varieties, class of soil, and weather conditions. The small boll cottons require from one hundred to one hundred and twenty bolls to make a pound of seed cotton, while some of the large boll varieties require only forty to sixty to the pound. The manner of opening of bolls difi"ers greatly with the varieties; some yield their locks freely, while others open in such a way as to cause the lock to adhere closely. The latter kinds are preferred in a windy country or where the harvesting is not done promptly. The seed cotton produces about two thirds seed and one third lint or fiber when ginned. O C o cj c^ te. S, ,»>, 1) »■ DESCRIPTION OF COTTON PLANT 1 9 Five hundred pounds of lint Is a bale. A bushel of seed weighs thirty-two pounds. The seed are rich In oil and nitrogen, and are usually worth about one sixth as much as the lint. Climate and Soils CHAPTER III CLIMATE AND SOILS WHAT is commonly known as the cotton belt of the United States lies below latitude 37 degrees. This embraces the larger part of the following states, viz: Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Ten- nessee, and small portions of Virginia and Missouri. The climatic conditions of this particular region are perhaps more thoroughly adapted to the successful growing of the culti- vated varieties of cotton than any other yet known. The summers are long and the tem- perature relatively high. The average annual rainfall is between forty and fifty inches over the larger part of the cotton territory. Cotton being naturally a tropical plant, it does best in a warm, humid climate; but, on the other hand, can be grown profitably under semi-arid conditions. To reach full development, the 23 24 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON cotton plant must be grown where there are at least six months warm sunshine. The dates of killing frost In spring and fall are every Impor- tant with the cotton grower. While the picking sometimes extends Into the winter months, a killing frost stops all growth and frequently spoils considerable quantities of immature bolls. If the temperature is uniformly high, day and night, the young plant develops rapidly. On the other hand, should there be cold nights or a sudden drop in the temperature, the growth of the young plant is seriously checked and the stand may be so injured that replanting is necessary. The extreme sensitiveness of the cotton plant to cold makes it Important that planting be delayed for seasonable weather. There is nothing gained by planting before the ground and air have been sufficiently warmed to insure quick germination; besides, there is danger of losing the choicest seed if planted too soon. With warm weather, good cultivation, and a normal amount of moisture, the plant should reach maximum stalk growth by the first of August. After this the principal busi- ness of the plant should be to develop and mature fruit. CLIMATE AND SOILS 2$ The best cotton seasons are the ones during which there is an absence of abnormally heavy rainfall, but where showers and occasional rains are frequent enough to supply moisture for con- tinuous but not excessive growth. Such sea- sons permit the plant food to be assimilated gradually, and also causes a sufficient setting of early fruit to insure a fair yield. These conditions distribute the bolls in such a manner as to make the plant more symmetrical and give a more extended opening period, resulting in a better grade of lint, especially where pickers are limited during harvest season. A cold, wet spring is unfavorable, interfering with prepara- tion, retarding planting operations, and early cultivation. While such conditions materially lessen the chances for a good yield, the cotton plant is so adaptable to conditions of climate and soil that fair crops have been made when the early outlook was quite gloomy. Frequent heavy rains during June, July, and August, sometimes occur and seriously damage the crop. Such seasons interfere with proper cultivation, promote excessive plant growth at the expense of fruit, and encourage the multiplication of insect pests and fungous diseases that prey upon 26 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON cotton. The territory is so extensive, however, that there is wide variation in the weather con- ditions. Some sections may have favorable conditions, while the opposite may be true of others. No two states have the same weather conditions, and often in the same state there is a wide variation. There is, consequently, little probability of having an ideal season over all the cotton belt the same year. Under the present system and with the large acreage planted, it is doubtful whether an ideal season over the entire cotton area would be best for the industry. Under the most favorable con- ditions such a large crop might be grown from the present acreage that the price would per- haps be reduced below the cost of production. It will be noted by taking the averages for ten, twenty, and thirty years that the cotton crop will show a more uniform yield per acre than any other American farm crop. SOILS Cotton may be planted on almost any well- drained soil in the cotton region. It will be found growing readily on all kinds of soils from the stiff clays to the lightest sands. The CLIMATE AND SOILS 2/ vigor of growth and yields vary widely on diff- erent soils. A profitable crop can be produced on almost any class of land, provided suitable plant food is present or is furnished by applica- tions of fertilizers. The system of cropping practised In the cotton states has so reduced the fertility of some soils that crops cannot be grown on them at a profit. The use of so much of these poor, depleted lands accounts for the low average yields. Some of the cotton lands are naturally poor; and the constant cropping to cotton, with- out returning enough vegetable matter to retain fertility and protect from washing has made vast areas of once rich soils almost v/orthless. On the other hand, there are some extremely rich bottom lands and some newly cleared fields not in bottoms that have too much moist- ure and plant food for successful cotton raising. These should be devoted to corn, meadows or pastures. If planted to cotton the plant growth Is too rank and the fruit will often be scattering. There is also an additional danger of serious damage from the rotting of the bolls, insect depredations, and fungous diseases on these rich lands, 28 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON The most satisfactory of all lands for cotton, taking it through a long series of years, is a medium sandy loam with a clay subsoil. The nearest approach to ideal conditions can be maintained on such soil in all seasons. The plant growth in a normal year will neither be too rank nor too small. There is a com- paratively small percentage of typical loam soils now in cultivation. Some of the best of these have been cropped with cotton so continu- ously that much of the plant food has been exhausted and leached out. The per cent, of sand or clay in soils has an important bearing on both their mechanical texture and production. The texture of the soil means more to the average farmer than its chemical composition. Long experience and practice have taught him to determine the best cotton lands from observing the native growth and the texture of the soil, rather than from chemical knowledge of its contents. The tenant farmer soon learns the fields that are best suited to the crop, and this accounts largely for their continuous cropping in cotton. About 50 per cent, of all space In soils is occupied by air and water. Sandy soils are CLIMATE AND SOILS 29 composed of larger particles and naturally are less retentive of water; clay soils are composed of very fine particles and are more retentive of moisture. Under very dry conditions sandy soils do not retain moisture sufficient for cotton; while, on the other hand, clay soils are equally objectionable during wet or rainy periods for the opposite reason. The most reliable cotton lands are therefore loams and sandy loams, well drained, but with sufficient clay to make them retentive enough to insure a uniform moisture supply during the growing season. When such soils have had proper preparation and the early rains have been stored and re- tained by later shallow and frequent cultiva- tion, the yield may be expected to turn out satisfactorily in all seasons. The mechanical condition of all soils are greatly improved by keeping them well supplied with vegetable matter. Cotton Culture CHAPTER IV COTTON CULTURE PREPARATION of Seed Bed.— Where possible to do so, break the land in the early fall or winter. This breaking should be done on most soils before December first. If an ordinary turning plow is used, break one or two inches deeper than usual, cutting a narrow furrow slice in order to set the furrow on edge to prevent bringing the subsoil to the surface. The disk breaking plow is especially suited for this fall breaking as it brings but little of the subsoil to the surface. If a disk plow can be secured, use it and go down as deep as possible. On well-drained lands the fall breaking may be done broadcast. On poorly drained lands it is better to throw up in high beds or ridges in order to give drainage and to thoroughly aerate the soil during the winter. 33 34 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON The object of deep fall plowing is mainly to increase the supply of available plant food and the storage of moisture in the soil. The parti- cles of the soil are separated by this tillage, allowing frost to penetrate deeper and the air and moisture to circulate freely, and the winter rains are stored up for use in the spring and early summer. When the subsoil is first brought to the surface it is a dead inert mass, and the soil particles must be acted on by the oxygen of the air, the frost, and the rains to make plant food available. Every farmer has observed that when a ditch is dug and dirt is thrown out from the bottom nothing will grow on it for several months. The second year the rankest growth is found on this soil. An additional advantage of fall breaking is that it destroys some injurious insects, which pass the winter in the soil. Deep fall plowing is of great value in fields long in cultivation where the plant growth is medium or less. On very rich, moist soils where there is too much avail- able plant food for cotton, a condition that makes an excessive growth of the stalk and a consequent decrease in fruitage, it is best not to do fall breaking. Such lands should be COTTON CULTURE 35 broken shallow in the spring. Deep, light, sandy soils should not be broken in the fall unless covered with a heavy crop of vegetation or where a winter cover crop is to be planted to utilize available plant food and prevent leaching. Where land was broken deeply in the fall, rebreak in the spring from three to four weeks before time to plant, and throw in slight beds or ridges the desired width of the cotton rows. This will give sufficient time for the beds to become firm before planting. This spring rebreaking or bedding can be very rapidly and satisfactorily done with a disk cultivator by adjusting the disks so as to throw up a slight bed. Just before planting, freshen and thor- oughly pulverize the surface of the beds to a depth from one to one and one half inches. The cotton plant first throws out its feeding roots in the moist, warm, surface soil, and it is best, therefore, immediately before planting, to use freely the section, disk or some other harrow. Time spent in making a good seed bed in not wasted. Go over the field several times with the harrow if necessary. Where it is not possible to break the land in 36 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON the fall or early winter, break broadcast as early in February or March as soil conditions will permit, as deep or slightly deeper than it has been previously broken. It is seldom advisable to turn the subsoil in the spring. It is usually too full of water and it is too late for much effective action of the air upon the soil and for the rains to firm the sub- soil before planting. Even where the land is not plowed until spring it is found profitable to rebed before planting. Freshen and thoroughly pulverize the surface of the beds immediately before planting. It is usually better to plant cotton on a firm seed bed. If the land cannot be broken or bedded in the spring In time to be- come firm by rains, then a heavy drag or roller should be run over the loosely plowed land to firm it before planting. A poor stand often results from planting cotton on a loose bed on account of lack of sufficient moisture to insure germination. It is also difficult to plant seed the proper depth on a loose seed bed. Whether it is best to plant cotton flat or on beds is a question that is wholly determined by local conditions. On level, well-drained lands cu ^ T^ H 'Ww^M* * .j>&<^'/^'*^^ A terraced field Method of makinji; broad terrace COTTON CULTURE 37 flat planting is practicable, and it will be easier to cultivate than where cotton is planted on ridges. Cotton is planted on beds as a pre- caution against heavy rainfall after planting. Seeds require moisture for germination, but must be kept out of standing water in the soil. Where conditions are such that cotton can be flat planted, it may also be planted in check rows which insures easier and more economical cultivation. Even where cotton is planted on beds or ridges the beds should be dragged down with the harrow so that they have only a slight elevation above the level surface. In semi-arid sections cotton is frequently planted in the bottom of a freshly opened furrow between beds in order to get the seed into moist soil. Width of Rows. — The proper spacing of the rows for cotton is important. The general rule for spacing is that the distance between the rows shall be a little more than the height of the plant in average years. Where cotton usually grows two or three feet high, the rows should be from three and one half to four feet apart. Where cotton normally grows three and one half feet high, plant in four foot rows. Where 38 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON it grows from four to five feet high, space the rows four and one half to five feet apart. It is better to have the rows a little too wide than too narrow. Air and sunlight are of great im- portance in pushing the crop to maturity. Date of Planting. — Cotton should be planted as soon in the spring as danger from frost is past and the soil becomes sufficiently warm to quickly germinate the seed and insure healthy and vigorous growth of the plant. The best time for planting cotton along the Gulf Coast is probably between the dates of March 25th and April 25th. In the central part of the Gulf States planting should be between April loth and May 1st. In the northern part of the cotton belt planting should be between April 20th and May 15th. The largest part of the cotton crop is planted before the first of May in the central part of the cotton belt, but fre- quently fields of cotton are planted as late as the middle or last of May and produce good crops. On the rich alluvial lands of the Mis- sissippi Valley, following overflows, cotton some- times produces a fair crop even when planted late in June. Extra early or extra late plant- ing is not recommended. Extremely early COTTON CULTURE 39 planting increases the labor of cultivation, and the young, tender plants are frequently injured by the frost. Very late planting lessens the labor of cultivation, but the crop is liable to be cut short in the fall by early frost, which destroys immature bolls. Cotton Planters. — Where cotton is planted on ridges the most satisfactory planter to use is the one-horse walking planter. There are a num- ber of these planters on the market. The principal features to be desired in a planter are: regular and uniform distribution of the seed, and uniform depth of planting. Some of the planters have adjustments for dropping the seed in hills instead of in continuous drill. With these planters it is often necessary to dampen the seed and roll them in dust, lime or ashes to temporarily paste down the fuzz in order to get regular distribution of the seed. Seed planted in hills require less work with the hoe in thinning to a stand, but the extra care in preserving the stand about offsets any advantage to be derived by planting in hills. Depth of [Planting. — Cotton should be planted shallow, not over one inch deep, pro- 40 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON vided that depth reaches moisture, in which case plants will be up in a few days. In sections of light rainfall or when planting late in the season, it will be necessary to plant deeper than one inch. More stands of cotton are lost from planting too deep than from planting too shallow. Amount of Seed Per Acre. — Where seeds are distributed in continuous drill, three pecks of good seed per acre is ample. A stand may be secured with half this amount of seed when planted the proper depth on a good seed bed, but it is an advantage to have more plants on the land than necessary, so that if a few of them are destroyed in the first cultivation the stand will not be injured. First Cultivation. — Begin the cultivation as soon as the seeds are planted by running once or twice across the rows with a section harrow. When cotton is up to a stand, run diagonally across the rows with a section harrow with the teeth slanted backward at an angle of forty-five degrees. One week later go over the cotton again with the section harrow, diagonally across the rows in the opposite direction. This will destroy a few of the plants, but if three COTTON CULTURE 4I pecks of good seed per acre have been planted, not enough plants will be destroyed to injure the stand. The weeder is better for this early cultivation than the harrow on very loose soil, and should always be used instead of the harrow on sandy soils. ^^ Chopping''^ or Thinning. — This early culti- vation with the section harrow or weeder de- stroys young grass and weeds and leaves the cotton in fine condition for "chopping" or thinning. The common practice of "barring off," leaving the plants on a narrow ridge to save labor in thinning, is unnecessary if the harrow has been used to keep the rows free of weeds and grass. If it should be found neces- sary to run around the cotton to destroy grass and save labor with the hoe in thinning, this work can be done more satisfactorily with a side harrow than with the turning plow. The turning plow should never be used in cultivation unless the crop has become so foul with weeds and grass that it is impossible to clean it with other implements. Where planting was rather early it Is better to thin twice, leaving two or three times the number of plants needed at the first thinning, 42 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON and about three weeks later thin to a stand. Where planting is done toward the latter part of the planting season It is advisable to bring to stand at first thinning. The distance apart of plants in the drill will depend upon the fertility of the soil. On medium soils where plants grow about three feet tall, leave plants from fifteen to twenty inches apart in the drill. Where cotton nor- mally grows four to four and one half feet tall thin from twenty to twenty-four inches in the drill. Later Cultivation. — The first cultivation after using the section harrow or weeder, may be given with some form of cultivator. Among the implements used for this cultivation and with which satisfactory results are obtained are the following: the fourteen-inch heel sweep and short bull-tongue point on one-horse Georgia stock; one-horse spring- tooth culti- vator; five shovel, one horse cultivator; and the sulky cultivator with short, narrow, dia- mond point shovel attachments, or with spring- tooth attachments. If the land has become hard and compact from rains since plant- ing, the first cultivations may be rather deep. COTTON CULTURE 43 This will not be likely to occur, however, if the section harrow has been run as often as recommended. All later cultivation should be shallow. During periods of excessive rains it may be necessary to cultivate deeper to clear the crop of weeds and grass, but after this is done continue the shallow cultivations as before. If the land is clear of stumps the cultivation can be done more economically with a two-horse cultivator that will cultivate the entire row at one trip. Any form of attach- ment may be used on the sulky cultivator which will give a loose dust mulch about one to two inches deep. If from any cause it is not practi- cable to use the sulky cultivator, excellent work can be done with a one-horse cultivator or with a one-horse Georgia stock, with broad narrow- winged sweep (heel sweep) if the dirt Is allowed to fall loosely over it. Care should be exercised in cultivating cotton not to allow the cultivator to go deep enough to break the feeding roots of the plant. On very rich, moist soils, where cotton has a tendency to grow an excessive stalk with consequent decrease in fruitage, it is often helpful to cultivate deeper than above recommended in order to check the growth of 44 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON the plant and encourage fruiting. Usually this should be done early in the season and dis- continued when plants begin to set fruit freely. Cultivating every seven to ten days, weather and soil conditions permitting, will be best. This will allow, on an average, seven to nine culti- vations. The general practice is to stop culti- vation too early. In most sections it will pay to continue cultivation until the crop is prac- tically matured. Fertilizers for Cotton CHAPTER V FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON COMMERCIAL fertilizers were not used for cotton until about i860. At this early date wonderful results were at- tributed to their use in increasing the crops. For several years the increase in the use of them was followed with good results, but after a time the idea began to spread that the stimulating effect gave out and the soils really became poorer. The truth of the mat- ter was that with their continued use and with the clean cultivation, all the vegetable matter and humus became exhausted. A natural consequence was poor land and decreased yields. The alluvial bottoms along the streams and some of the rich uplands will produce profitable cotton crops without the aid of manures of any kind. Commercial fertilizers, when wisely used, have been profitable to the cotton grower, 47 48 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON but an extravagant and often unintelligent use has been too common. The one-crop system of the cotton states has been followed until much of the best lands have become unprofitable without the use of artificial plant food. There are vast areas where the natural fertility is too low to produce paying yields without the application of fertil- izer. These facts, with the demand for a quick cash crop, the prevalence of the credit system, the indifferent nature of the negro laborer, and the necessity for hastening maturity to avoid insect pests has led up to a general use of com- mercial fertilizers in recent years. A sort of fertilizer craze has swept over the Atlantic and Gulf States, only that portion of the cotton region west of the Mississippi escaping. The farmers have bought it and used it extrava- gantly and unwisely, thereby bringing upon themselves and their states a fertilizer debt, much of which is an unnecessary drain upon the resources. The following figures show the value of commercial fertilizers consumed in cotton states in 1910 based on inspection and tax laws as reported by state officials: North Caro- Cultivating cotton with a spring-tooth cultivator Cultivating cotton with a two-horse cultivator Young cotton plants FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 49 Una, ^14,368,100; South Carolina, ^20,104,305; Georgia, $22,719,760; Florida, $3, 523,39°; Ala- bama, $8,200,000; Mississippi, $4,055,540; Ten- nessee, $1,172,240; Louisiana, $1,820,200; Texas, $860,000. The above figures represent the value of commercial fertilizers and cotton seed meal used. No report was given of the amount of cottonseed meal used in Alabama, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Texas. The above table does not take into account a large amount of cotton seed and other fertilizing materials of which no official record was kept. While all of this fertilizer was not used for cotton, it was paid for out of the proceeds of the cotton crop. Until recent fertilizer laws were passed in the states requiring a guaranteed analysis to be stamped on the package, unscrupulous manu- facturers and dealers sold much cheap, inferior goods to the farmers at high prices. The law does not prevent making cheap grade fertilizer, but it must be branded so that the purchaser will know just what he is buying. The average farmer wants a cheap grade article notwith- standing the fact that the plant food in a high grade is cheaper and more satisfactory. It is 50 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON a matter of record that in the early days of commercial fertilizer the foulest smelling and the most repulsive looking brand was considered most effective. This idea no longer prevails among intelligent farmers. The first thing they look for is the tag showing available elements in each package. But the mass of farmers have not been sufficiently educated along this line. They still buy on credit and consequently take what the dealer offers, re- gardless of price or grade. We hope this book will be of value in aiding purchasers to buy and use fertilizers with more intelligence and profit in the future. The chief object in the use of any fertilizer is, of course, increased yield, and to bring this about it must supply available plant food, or make available some of that already tied up in the soil. Usually artificial fertilizers per- form both of these offices. Most soils contain all the elements that enter into the plant growth except three — nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash. There is enough potash found in the soils In nearly all the South- ern States. This Is especially true on the red clays if a proper rotation is followed. FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 5 1 Commercial fertilizers cannot be bought in a pure state, but in combination with other substances which are of no value except to increase the bulk and make it easier to dis- tribute. The farmer should, by all means, know that the value of a fertilizer depends not on gross weight, but on the amount of available plant food contained. No fertilizer should be purchased that does not have the guaranteed analysis printed on the package. The composition is given in percentages, and in each hundred pounds there should be so many pounds of the particular element mentioned. For example, a fertilizer is offered for sale branded as follows: Nitrogen . Water-soluble phosphoric acid . Citrate-soluble phosphoric acid Total available phosphoric acid Potash 2 per cent. 8 per cent, 2 per cent. lo per cent. 2 per cent. Translated into terms of pounds this means that in a sack weighing lOO pounds there are: 2 pounds of nitrogen. 8 pounds of water-soluble phosphoric acid. 2 pounds of citrate-soluble phosphoric acid lo pounds of available phosphoric acid. 2 pounds of potash. 52 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON This gives a total of 14 pounds of plant food in a 100-pound sack. When a ton of such fertili- zer is bought, the purchaser receives nitrogen, 40 pounds; water-soluble phosphoric acid, 160 pounds; citrate-soluble phosphoric acid, 40 pounds; potash 40 pounds. Notice that what is called "available" is the sum of the water-sol- uble and the citrate-soluble phosphoric acid. In this fertilizer we get three things that are of use — 2 pounds of nitrogen, 10 pounds of phosphoric acid, and 2 pounds of potash to the 100 pounds. If cotton seed meal, acid phosphate, and kainit are used to make this fertilizer, it will require the following quantities for one ton of the mixture: Table I. — Proportions and value of cotton seed meal, ACID phosphate, AND KAINIT REQUIRED FOR A TON OF fertilizer OF A 2-IO-2 COMPOSITION FERTILIZING MATERIAL POUNDS VALUE Cotton seed meal (6.4 per cent. Ni- trogen) Acid phosphate (16 per cent, avail- able) Kainit (12.5 per cent, potash) 625 1,140 235 ^8.00* 10.00 2.00 Total 2,000 $20 . 00 *The value of fertilizing materials is calculated on the basis of 20 cents a pound for nitrogen and 5 cents a pound each for phosphoric acid and potash. FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 53 The figures quoted express the actual cost of the materials, so by the time such a fertilizer reaches the farmer it will cost him nearer ^25 per ton. The difference between the value of materials and the price the farmer pays repre- sents the cost of mixing, and bagging, and the profits. It will be found that all materials used in mixing fertilizers vary in the amount of plant food contained in them. Taking acid phosphate for example, we find some running as low as 10 pounds of available phosphoric acid per 100 pounds, while the best grade runs as high as 16 pounds or more per lOO pounds. On this basis, val- uing phosphoric acid at 5 cents per pound, the first would cost 50 cents, whereas the latter would cost 80 cents. Even greater differences will be found in the grades of cot- tonseed meal. Samples of cotton seed meal can now be found ranging from 3.5 per cent, to 7 per cent, of nitrogen. Basing the values on the nitrogen contained, Table II shows the relative values of cotton seed meal of the different grades. It is assumed that cotton seed meal containing 54 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON 6.5 per cent, of nitrogen can be bought for ^28 per ton. Table II. — Values per ton of cotton seed meal of DIFFERENT GRADES PER CENT OF NITRO- GEN VALUE PER CENT OF NITRO- GEN VALUE PER CENT OF NITRO- GEN VALUE PER CENT OF NITRO- GEN VALUE 6-5 6.4 $28.00 27.67 6-3 6.2 ^27.13 26.71 6.0 $25.84 24.12 3-5 $21.97 1507 The average sample of cotton seed meal con- tains approximately the following percentages of plant food. Nitrogen 6.4 per cent. Phosphoric Acid 2.7 per cent. Potash 1.8 per cent. A lOO-pound sack will therefore contain the following quantities of plant food. Nitrogen 6.4 pounds Phosphoric acid 2.7 " Potash 1.8 " The results following the use of cottonseed meal indicate that decomposition makes the phosphoric acid in the meal available. In buying materials for mixing fertilizers it is FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 55 always economy to use only high-grade goods, even though they cost a little more. How to Use Commercial Fertilizers. — If fer- tilizers are used, the following general rule should govern: On rich lands use mainly fer- tilizers that will stimulate the fruit and not stalk growth. On lighter lands use more of the elements to force growth, combined with others which will mature the fruit. High-grade acid phosphate may be considered a basis for in- creasing the fruit and hastening the maturity of crops. Even on the richest land it has been demonstrated that a small percentage of ni- trogen added to the acid phosphate gives better results. Nitrogen. — The chief function of nitrogen is to promote plant growth, but it is also of very great importance in the production of fruit. Nitrogen enters largely into the composition of plants, and it follows that everything of vege- table origin is a valuable source of this sub- stance. When vegetable matter is burned the nitrogen is released from its combination, escapes into the atmosphere, and is lost. Hence, it is bad practice to burn off fields and destroy vegetable matter; it is better to turn it 56 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON under. The humus In vegetable matter has a value in soil renovation frequently greater than its value as a plant food. The most important sources of nitrogen used in com- mercial fertilizers are as follows: Table III. — Nitrogen content of important fertil- izer MATERIALS Source of nitrogen Per cent Source of nitrogen Per cent Cotton seed meal 6 to 7 Dried blood . 12 to 14 Tankage Q to 12 Fish scrap . Sulphate of am- monia Nitrate of soda . 7 to 8 .18 to 20 .14 to 16 Phosphoric Acid. — Next in importance as a plant food is phosphoric acid. It is largely required by the plant for growth, but it is absolutely essential in promoting fruitage and is a great factor in hastening the maturity of the crops. The principal commercial sources of phosphoric acid are as follows: Table IV. — Phosphoric acid content of important FERTILIZER MATERIALS Source of phosphoric ACID Percent Rock phosphate: Dissolved . . 12 to 16 Ground . . .24 to 32 Thomas slag . .15 to 20 Source OF PHOSPHORIC Acm Percent Bone meal: Dissolved Ground . IS to 17 20 to 22 FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON S7 Potash. — Potash is more directly effective in developing the fruit and adds to the vigor of the plant. It is seldom deficient in soils and especially in the soils of the Gulf States. It is obtained from the following sources: Table V. — Potash content of important fertilizer MATERIALS Source of potash Per cent Source of potash Per cent Kainit . Muriate of potash 12-5 So.o Sulphate of potash Wood ashes 53 5 to 20 It should be understood that the fertilizing content of all the above-named materials are not readily available for the use of the plant. The amounts available should always deter- mine the value of the material. An example to illustrate may be found in acid phosphate. The total content of the ground rock is twice that of dissolved rock, but such a large per cent, of the ground rock is unavailable that it might be cheaper to buy the dissolved rock at twice the price per ton. The same principle applies in a greater or less degree to all the other materials used in making commercial fertilizers. What Fertilizer to Buy. — Since the elements of plant food already mentioned are required in 58 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON different quantities and since the soils vary in their supply, it is well for the farmer to know what his soil and plants need before investing his money in fertilizers. The practical way for the farmer to determine these facts is to observe the growth of the plants on his land. If the plants grow rapidly and make an abundance of leaf and stalk it is evidence of a good supply of nitrogen. If there is not a proportionate amount of fruit it is a sure indication that the soil needs phosphoric acid. On the other hand, if the plant does not have a good color and tends to drop its fruit before it reaches a fair size it indicates that the soil requires potash. Most of the soils in the South are deficient in both nitrogen and phosphoric acid, and some in potash, so when commercial fertilizers are bought their value depends upon their content of these substances. If the farmer has saved all manures and has grown cowpeas or other legumes abundantly, he will rarely have to buy nitrogen. For rich soils, or soils where a heavy crop of peas, beans, or clover was grown the previous year, use one part of cotton seed meal and three parts of acid phosphate for cotton. For me- FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 59 dium soils use one part of cotton seed meal and two parts of acid phosphate. On thin soils use one part of cotton seed meal and one part of acid phosphate. These proportions are for soils rich in potash, but deficient in nitrogen and phosphoric acid. Experiments have shown that most of the clay soils in the cotton states do not need potash for growing field crops. On soils showing a need of it potash should be added. On some soils experiments have shown that neither acid phosphate nor potash is needed; examples of such soils are found in the black waxy lands of west Alabama, east Mis- sissippi, and Texas, and the stiff alluvial lands of the Mississippi Valley. On these soils nitrogen and humus seem to be all that is needed. Deep sandy lands such as are found in Florida and along the coastal plains are in many cases deficient in potash, as well as in phosphoric acid and nitrogen. On such soils a complete fertilizer or one containing nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash should be used. Amount of Fertilizer to Use Per Acre. — No definite instructions in regard to the use of fertilizers can be given to fit all conditions and 6o KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON soils. This question must be settled by tests on individual farms. The following formula will serve as a guide in mixing fertilizers to be used under the conditions mentioned: Table VI. — Proportions of fertilizer for cotton POUNDS OF FERTILIZER PER ACRE On sandy loam or clay soils when On deep sandy Fertilizer to be used. Poor Medium Rich soil of me- dium grade. Cotton seed meal Acid phosphate Kainit ISO ISO I GO 200 7S 225 ISO ISO ISO Where it is found that potash is needed on clay lands, one hundred pounds of kainit or its equivalent in muriate or sulphate of potash may be added. Where the land has grown a heavy crop of peas or beans the year before, half the amount of cotton seed meal may be used. On the black waxy lands of Alabama and Mississippi and the stiff alluvial lands of the Mississippi Valley that have been planted to cotton for a long period of years and have be- come deficient in vegetable matter, 200 to 300 pounds of cotton seed meal or 100 pounds nitrate of soda per acre have given profitable returns. FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 6l The amount of fertilizer to use depends on several factors. The cost of the material used in the fertilizer, the value of the land, the need and condition of the soil, and the money value of the crops to be grown must each be considered. The greater the money value the crop represents the larger the quantity of fertilizer that can be used with profit. Large applications of fertilizer never pay on thin, poorly prepared soils. The amount of fertilizer to use is a question of economics as well as of crop culture. With i2-cent cotton the farmer can realize large returns from 600 to 800 pounds per acre on soils in good condition. Different Forms of Fertilizing Materials. — Elsewhere we have suggested some of the most common sources of nitrogen, phosphoric acid, and potash. In the formula given acid phos- phate and cotton seed meal have been used. They are the most commonly known and more generally used. If for any good reason it is desirable to substitute other materials in the mixture, it can be readily done. Simply sub- stitute in proper porportions. Ordinarily nitrate of soda should not be used in making mixed fertilizers. It is better to use it as a top- 62 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON dressing for growing crops. Where nitrate of soda is used for cotton, apply it about the time the plant begins to fruit. If more than lOO pounds per acre is used make two applications fifteen days apart. Methods of Mixing. — The mixing of fertili- zers on the farm can be done very satisfactorily by emptying the raw materials on a tight floor of wood or concrete; or if more convenient it may be done on a hard, dirt floor under a shed or outhouse. It is better not to empty over 400 to 600 pounds at one time, as it can be more readily and thoroughly mixed in small quantities. The mixing can be done with hoes and shovels by turning over two or three times and continu- ing this process until the desired quantity Is ready for use. This method of home mixing is very desirable where the farmer wishes to leave out any element or in any way change the proportion to better suit special conditions. Hozv to Apply Commercial Fertilizers. — Before applying commercial fertilizers prepare the soil thoroughly. Where 500 pounds of fertilizer or less Is used for cotton put it all out In one application In the furrow about ten days FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 63 before planting and mix well with the soil. On deep sandy soils it may be best to make two applications; one half at planting and remainder at second cultivation. Where 600 or more pounds per acre are used two applications may be made, one half in the furrow before planting and the remainder as side applications at the second working of the crop. When using 1,000 pounds or more, make two or more applications or broadcast the entire amount before planting. The depth to which the commercial fertilizer is applied is important. Experiments have shown that about three inches is the proper depth in all except semi-arid regions, where it should be put deeper. It has been a common practice among farmers to apply fertilizers too deep. The following facts regarding fertilizers should be kept in mind by the cotton farmer: 1. Never allow the waste of barnyard manure. 2. All waste and by-products from the farm should be returned to the land. 3. Rotation of crops is essential for per- manent soil building. Legumes and green crops 64 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON should be grown liberally and turned under to furnish humus, and keep the soil in good mechanical condition. 4. The greatest benefit to be derived from commercial fertilizers is in combination with farm manures and green crops turned under. A much more liberal application can be made profitable under these conditions. 5. A general and rather liberal use of commercial fertilizer can be recommended if intelligence and good judgment is displayed. 6. Excessive and reckless use of commercial fertilizer should be avoided. Beyond a certain limit profits are much more uncertain. 7. One application on clay soils has been found as satisfactory as more where less than 500 pounds per acre were used. Quickly available substances, such as nitrate of soda, should be applied to growing crops. When large amounts of fertilizer are used, and on special soils, two applications are sometimes more profitable. 8. Where all the benefits from fertilizers are desired the first season, only readily avail- able materials should enter into Its composition. For permanent improvement of the soil more FERTILIZERS FOR COTTON 65 slowly available materials may be used and these are usually cheaper. 9. The effect of fertilizers on crops after the first year depends on season, soil condition, and materials used. 10. Fertilizers give best results when not applied more than two or three inches deep, ex- cept when used on dry land, then they should be deeper. 11. Organic nitrogen such as cottonseed meal, dried blood, tankage, and fish scrap have been found preferable in mixed fertilizers where only one early application is made. 12. Potash is not needed on much of the cotton soils as a fertilizer, but kainit has been found greatly beneficial on soils subject to ^T^ c ?;o X! g ll^^ "o P >> ^ tn tn C 'U 6X3+-' 75 -G O HE 4^ +J O T! > >. cj t.Xl a> *-i » o c O HARVESTING AND MARKETING COTTON 129 If some working system of warehouses could be organized and maintained on a business basis, it would perhaps be the most economi- cal way of handling the cotton crop. Mana- gers of these houses could collect and classify cotton and sell direct to the large buyer. This would enable the manufacturer to pay more on an average for cotton, since he is thus assured of getting large quantities of a product uniform in grade. The custom of holding cotton for a bet- ter price, in the meantime leaving it out of doors and unprotected, is not profit- able. The actual damage to the cotton is often greater than any increase in price that may be obtained. The old custom of marketing the cotton crop through the commission merchants has almost been discontinued. This method always placed the farmer at the mercy of the buyer, and by the time commission, storage, insurance, and other fixed charges were deducted, less was realized for the cotton than if it had been sold in the local market. In some places the farmers market their cotton by selling in the seed to the public ginner, 130 KNApP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON instead of having the crop ginned at so much cash per bale. The usual cash price for ginning and covering in recent years has ranged from $2.50 to ^3.50 per bale. Selling seed cotton is a bad practice from the farmer's standpoint. It puts the farmer at a disadvantage since the price is b^sed on a certain grade, and no al- lowance is made for advance in prices or for premiums on better grades. A mutual agreement on some improved method of marketing the cotton crop would be beneficial alike to producer and spinner. Such a system would tend to prevent violent fluctua- tion in prices. This reform can only be brought about by a closer understanding between grower and spinner. The multiplicity of middlemen has become an immense burden, not only in the cotton business but in the handling of all farm crops. In the past the entire crop has been thrown upon the market in three or four months, when it should have been distributed throughout the year. The high price of cotton in recent years has bettered the financial condition of the Southern cotton grower to such an extent that in the future the crop can be held and HARVESTING AND MARKETING COTTON I3I marketed through the year. This should result in a more equitable adjustment of values between all parties concerned, and at the same time eliminate the drain in the form of fixed charges that exist under the present system. Cost of Cotton Production CHAPTER X COST OF COTTON PRODUCTION ONE of the hardest problems for the cot- ton farmer to solve with any degree of accuracy is cost of production. There are so many factors to be dealt with which are beyond man's control that no real basis for esti- mating the cost of the year's operations can be made. In nearly every other business there are some known quantities upon which to base cal- culations. To the farmer nothing is absolutely sure, especially is this true with the cotton farmer. Climatic conditions perhaps mean more to him than to any one. The returns for his year's labor must of necessity depend upon the caprice of the rain, the wind, the frost or the depredation of numerous insect pests. Any one or all of these may in a very short period turn a flattering prospect for a bountiful crop into almost a complete failure. We may take the statistics showing total 136 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON production of the cotton or the yield per acre for a series of years and the variations or fluctuations will be quite noticeable. These rather wide differences are due largely to causes over which the farmer has no control. The same general plan of crop management on the same land with the same amount of fertil- izer, teams, and labor may have been used each year and still the yields vary a great deal. The total crop production on the same acreage with practically the same expenses frequently varies as much as 25 per cent, in two successive seasons. These extreme fluctuations make a wide margin between the cost of production and the selling price necessary for the farmer to come out with an average profit in the crop. The elements of uncertainty which enter into the production of every crop, make it impossible to estimate the cost. The business man or the manufacturer can figure with some degree of certainty as to what his running expenses will be. He can also make a pretty close estimate of what the out- put of his factory or business will reach during the year. It often happens that the manu- facturer knows just what he is to receive for his Transverse section of a cotton gin COST OF COTTON PRODUCTION 1 37 products before they are made. At all events there is not the degree of uncertainty about it that the farmer has to meet. We have mentioned some of the natural causes or climatic conditions which may cause wide variations in yields and profits, but the farmer himself must be taken into account as one of the greatest factors. One man can manage his cotton farm so as to make handsome profit, while another under the same natural surroundings, but with a less degree of business ability, agricultural knowledge, or industry, would produce the crop at a net loss. To get out of cotton farming under the new order of things more than a mere existence a man must use brains and incessant industry along with his physical labor. The days of profitable farming along the old trodden paths are numbered. By this we do not mean that there is no place for cotton on the small farm, for, if properly managed, there Is a possibility of greater profits than on the larger farms. The ordinary methods followed on both the one-horse and the larger farms must give way to more up-to-date management. Under a dif- ferent system two horses can be used profit- 138 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON ably 'where one has been deemed sufficient before. The plan of crops can be changed so as to furnish labor for team and help for a longer period than where cotton alone is grown. At the same time the better teams and imple- ments will easily double' the yield which would give as much cotton as before, and allow half the land for other purposes. To break the land properly, to do the hauling and cultivation at least expense, two horses or mules are necessary on any farm. The all-cotton system of farming was never really successful under any conditions. Statistics from any section of the cotton territory, whether taken for the present or fifty years ago, will show that the only farmer who had money to lend and supplies to furnish the entire farm was the man who did not grow all cotton. The actual time devoted to making and gathering the crop on an all-cotton farm is not more than six months. This leaves hands and teams practically idle for the other six months. The expenses for subsistence for both labor and teams for this idle period must be about the same that it is for the other six months, but unless there is some profitable labor furnished COST OF COTTON PRODUCTION 1 39 them during this time, this additional expense must necessarily be taken from the proceeds of the cotton crop. Such management as this accounts for the higher cost of cotton pro- duction. Under a better planned system just as much cotton can be grown and, besides, all the foodstuff necessary for the labor and the teams. Cotton farmers often claim that it is more economical to grow cotton exclusively and buy all the supplies for the farm. Practical experience and close observations and inquiry into the subject do not confirm the correctness of their claims. Even at the rather phenom- enally high price of cotton for the past few years, the man who actually grew it made little clear profit unless he also grew his supplies. The landlord who furnished the land at high rentals and supplied his tenants at enormous credit prices, no doubt gets big profit from the all- cotton method, especially in the good years. The small farmer and tenant has not nor will he ever be able to get much more than a poor living out of cotton farming, when he buys everything else used on the farm from the proceeds of the crop. It is difficult for a man who has been accustomed to figure expenses, 140 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON incomes, and profits in an ordinary business to realize why the same methods of accounting cannot be applied to farm operations. The elements of risk and uncertainty met on the farm due to natural causes over which man has little control, but which so greatly effects expenses and yields, are lost sight of in making calculations. Here is where so many who know nothing of the practical side of farming are led Into trouble. Certain fixed expenses and the climatic changes are left out of the calculations. The following is given as an example which serves to illustrate the differences in good and poor farming. The first column represents results from good farming on fair land with good teams and tools, allowing a yield of 1,500 pounds seed cotton per acre. The second column is the results from ordinary farming on average cotton lands with insufficient teams and tools. Yield per acre 600 pounds of seed cotton : Good Poor Chopping stalks $ 5° $50 Breaking land 1. 00 1.50 Harrowing .50 .£0 Opening furrows and distributing fer- tilizer 50 1. 00 Bedding and harrowing for planting . .75 1. 50 COST OF COTTON PRODUCTION 141 Planting .... Chopping and hoeing Cultivation Fertilizer . Seed (for planting) Picking Ginning and baling Hauling to gin and to market Rent of land Less value of seed @ ^18 per ton . Good ■25 1 .00 5.00 4.00 • 50 9.00 3.00 S 1.50 5.0c ^32-50 9.00 Poor •75 150 4.50 3-00 •25 3-6o 1.20 .60 3.00 $23 . 40 3.60 ^23.50 $19.80 Sale of lint @ 10 cents . . . $50.00 $20.00 Net profit . 26.50 .20 Cost per pound .047 .099 These figures do not allow anything for wear and tear on teams and implements nor is there anything accounted for supervision. There are several other legitimate expenses which must be made which would add to the total cost. Unless the labor and teams are profitably employed during the period when they are not needed for the cotton crop the cost of subsist- ence must be added as an additional item. Some of the items might be reduced by excep- tional management. For instance, the fertil- 142 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON izers can be reduced by a saving of farm manures and rotation of crops. The cost of food and farm supplies could possibly be reduced, if grown intelligently on the farm. A fair profit may be expected under average conditions where the crop is produced upon a cash basis and where a reasonable degree of knowledge is used in producing it. Equipment in Teams and Tools for Cotton Farms CHAPTER XI EQUIPMENT IN TEAMS AND TOOLS FOR COTTON FARMS LABOR-SAVING machinery plays an important part in the economy of pro- duction of any crop. As liberal an assortment of labor-saving tools is required in cotton farming as in any other type of farming. The principal difference in the equipment for a large or a small cotton farm, under the old one crop system, was mainly in the number of tools rather than in the kind. The cotton farmer has been slow in bringing to his aid labor- saving implements in the production of crops. This has been partly due to the fact that such a large per cent, of farm labor in the cotton belt was uneducated and unskilled in the use of machinery, and partly due to the fact that one man, under the one crop system of cotton farming, could, with one horse and with small one-horse plows or cultivators, produce as 145 146 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON much cotton as three or four laborers could harvest. On a 160-acre cotton farm, where one third of the area is devoted to corn and two thirds to cotton, the ordinary equipment in the past has consisted mainly of the one-horse, seven- inch moldboard plow; the small Georgia plow stock with sweep and shovel attachments; a one-horse cotton planter; the 14-tooth V- shaped harrow, and the hoe. The entire equipment for a 160-acre farm, under the old system, has been about as follows: 8 mules @ ^150.00 ^ $1,200 87-inch moldboard plows . . @ 7.00 = 56 8 i-horse plow stocks, with sweep and shovel attachments . @ 4.00 =: 32 8 V-shaped spiketooth harrows @ 4.00 = 32 4 i-horse cotton planters . . @ 5.00 := 20 24 hoes @, -SO = 12 I farm wagon @ 60 I set of double wagon harness 30 8 sets single plow harness. . @ 5.00 = 40 I set of repair tools .... 10 Total $1,492 The cotton farmer is beginning to diversify his crops and is rapidly discarding light mules and one-horse implements for heavier teams Ordinary equipment of implements on a one-horse cotton farm Ordinary equipment of implements on a two-horse cotton farm 3 EQUIPMENT IN TEAMS AND TOOLS I47 and improved farm machinery. The two, three, and four horse breaking plows, the sulky cultivator, disk harrow, section harrow, the weeder and the mower are fast coming into use on the cotton farms. The mule has been the principal work animai on the cotton farm in the past. In recent years many progressive farmers have substi- tuted heavy draft mares in the place of mules and have found them just as satisfactory as the mule except for the very rough work. These mares will do any ordinary farm work and will raise a valuable colt each year. The necessary equipment in teams and tools for a 160-acre cotton farm, where one fourth of the area is devoted to pasture, one fourth to cotton, one fourth to corn and one fourth to small grain and hay, is as follows: 2 mules 4 mares I farm wagon . 1 mower and rake 2 combination planters 3 12-inch moldboard plows I 24-inch disk breaking plow 1 20-inch 8 disk, disk harrow 2 riding sulky cultivators 200 = $ 400 200 = 800 60 60 IS = 30 12 = 36 35 25 35 = 70 148 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON 1 section harrow ^25 4 springtooth cultivators . . . . @ 5 = 20 2 one-horse, 5-shovel, cultivators . @ 12 = 24 I set of repair tools 25 Extra small tools 25 I reaper and binder 150 3 sets double harness . . . . @ 30 =::: 90 I manure spreader 125 Total $2,000 Dr. S. A. Knapp, of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, estimated that there is a possible increase of 300 per cent, in the productive power of the farm laborer in the average Southern state by the use of more and better teams and farm machinery. Cotton By-products CHAPTER XII COTTON BY-PRODUCTS SCARCELY more than a quarter of a cen- tury ago cotton seed, the chief by-product of the cotton crop, was considered worth- less except for planting purposes. A common practice among the ginners and large planters was to dump the seed into waste places, into the streams or anywhere to get them out of the way. Contamination of the water supply in the streams and the odor given off by the decomposition of the seed became a nuisance, and in some places steps were taken by the health authorities to prescribe the manner of disposing of them. The planters as well as the country in general little realized the immense value of the seed as a fertilizer and stock feed. History of the Oil Mill. — The first manu- facture of cotton seed products on a commercial scale did not begin in the United States but in England where no cotton is grown. In 151 152 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON 1870 that country had an annual crush of about 200,000 tons and was leading the world in the manufacture of cotton seed products. All of this supply had to be shipped across the ocean and there was much loss from the seed heating and decomposing in transit; so it was not long before it was found necessary to move the manufacturing industry nearer to the field of production. The increased uses made of the seed prod- ucts and the difficulty of getting the seed to the foreign mills in good shape led to the establishment of a great milling industry in the United States. The annual consumption by American oil mills is now more than 4,000,000 tons. The first cotton seed oil mills were built in the United States in 1840. As late as i860 there were only seven. In 1910 this number had been increased to 841. The number of laborers employed in oil mills increased from 12,600 In 1899 to more than 22,000 in 1910. The total value of the seed delivered at the mills in 1910 was about ^142,710,000, an increase of more than $100,000,000 over 1899. In 1910 the average cost per ton of seed was $27.40, more than 2§ times that of 1899. The total COTTON BY-PRODUCTS 1 53 value of the products manufactured from the seed in 1910 amounted to $152,710,000 as compared with $46,100,000 in 1899. This large rise in value was brought about by the increased consumption of mill products, and is shared by every state which grows cotton. The value of the products manufactured from a ton of seed in 1899 was $17.75 ^^^ that of 1910 was $32.50. The total value of oil mill products in 1910 was as follows: oil, $80,430,000; meal and cake, $44,660,000; hull, $11,370,000; and linters, $6,250,000. There has been considerable fluctuation in the price of seed from the beginning. This is due largely to the fluctuations in the price of the articles with which the products come in competition. For instance, the price of oil is effected quickly by fluctuations in the prices of such articles as hog lard, soap, and olive oil; the price of meal, cake, and hulls is governed largely by the fluctuations in the price of fertilizer and foodstuff materials with which they come In competition. The price of linters, another by-product of the seed, is governed by the same conditions. Products of a Ton of Seed. — There are al- 154 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON together over fifty useful products made from cotton seed. The following gives the average quantity of the chief products from a ton of seed, with a list of articles made from each: C Batting, stuffing, hats, X . J ) ropes, twines, carpets, 1. Linters 30 pounds < ,, ,' ^ ! j cellulose, paper, ana (. explosives rT 11 o J Feed, fertilizer, paper, 2. Hulls 840 pounds \ _ ' ^ >^ > and stumng 3. Cake or meal 730 pounds Feed, fertilizer f Soap stock, lard, cotto- ^., / J X o J ] lene, butter, salad oil, 4. Oil (crude) 280 pounds < ,. ., . , ., , I olive oil, miners oil, lu- ( bricating oil and paints Uses of Cotton Seed Oil. — There was for a long time considerable prejudice against the use of cotton seed oils in food products. This has now been largely overcome, and we find them used extensively in the manufacture of compound lard and cottolene; compound butter and cooking oils; in the manufacture of com- pound olive oil; and, in fact, nearly all compound oils now used In this country are composed largely of cotton seed oil. The cheaper grades are used largely in making soap, washing powder, glycerine, candles, and other necessaries which COTTON BY-PRODUCTS 155 require a low grade of oil. Some of tlie oil is also used for medicinal purposes, illuminating, lubricating, packing fish, and to some extent for the manufacture of oils for paint. Uses of Meal and Cake. — The chief use of cake and meal are for fertilizers and stock feed. The following table shows the value of high-grade seed meal as a fertilizer: FERTILIZING VALUE OF A TON OF SEED 128 lbs. nitrogen @ 20 cents $25.60 54 lbs. phosphoric acid @ 5 cents . . . 2.70 36 lbs. potash @ 5 cents i . 80 Total value $30 10 In 1910 South Carolina used 140,000 tons of cotton seed meal for fertilizer; Georgia 91,000 tons. North Carolina 70,000 tons and Mississippi 56,000; and other states in smaller quantities. The feed value of cotton seed meal and cake for fattening stock and furnishing a concentrated ration to dairy cows is more than for fertilizer. The United States Secretary of Agriculture, Hon. James Wilson, was asked a few years ago If he thought that the Southern farm lands could be made to produce as much as the rich, 156 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COttOM high-priced lands of the Central West. He said: "Why, of course. What is the hindrance? But the Southern farmer must quit sending his cotton seed meal over the world to enrich other lands. He must use the rich fertilizer himself." It is deplorable that the Southern farmer has allowed the larger part of this valuable fertil- izing and feed product to be shipped from its native territory to other sections of the United States and to Europe. The full feed value may be derived from cotton seed products and at the same time, if the manures from the stock are returned to the soil, from 70 to 90 per cent, of the fertilizing value may be retained on the farm. The combined feed and fertilizing value of a ton of high-grade cotton seed meal when fed to animals and the manure carefully saved and returned to the land is about ^50; when used alone as feed or a fertilizer Its value Is about ^30. The farmer sustains a tremendous loss when he fails to get both the feed and fer- tilizing value from cotton seed meal. When the Southern farmer appreciates the Import- ance of feeding the meal and returning the manure to the land, the South will become one of the greatest stock-raising countries In the world. COTTON BY-PRODUCTS 157 Southern farmers should keep enough stock to consume all the cotton seed meal on the farm, but it will be years before they can accumulate enough stock to do this. At present some meal Is fed to dairy cows and animals in the nearby towns, but compara- tively little of it goes back to the farm except what is used directly in the form of fertilizer. Cotton seed meal is one of the most satis- factory forms of nitrogen that can be used in making mixed fertilizers for the common farm crops. It is not only rich in nitrogen but contains considerable quantities of phosphoric acid and potash. The fertilizing elements in cotton seed meal are slowly available, a quality which makes It desirable for such crops as have a long growing period. Unless the cotton farmer has enough stock to consume his meal, It will pay better to use it as a fertilizer than to send it away to enrich other sections. Hulls. — Hulls are used for feed, paper, fertilizers and packing, but of recent years almost the entire supply has been utilized as a stock feed at prices ranging from $3 to ^10 per ton. In addition to the outside cover- ing of the cotton seed, the hulls contain small 158 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON portions of kernels or hearts which add to their feeding value. Their feeding value is about that of cheap grass hay or half that of good grass hay. Linters. — The linters or the short fiber that is taken from the seed in the first process of manufacture is used in making low grades of rope, twine, wrappings, and various other articles requiring a cheap grade of cotton. Other than a few minor improvements there has been no changes in oil mill machinery for the past twenty-five years. The linters are removed more closely, and several gallons more oil per ton are obtained than formerly. Soil Improvement on Cotton Farms CHAPTER XIII SOIL IMPROVEMENT ON COTTON FARMS CAUSES of Depleted Soils on Cotton Farms. — Good farm lands are now, and have always been, the greatest asset of any state or nation. The rapidly increasing population and the higher standard of civiliza- tion now spreading over all countries will make this problem of good lands a more important one in the future. Any system of farming that reduces the fertility of the soil or decreases its crop-pro- ducing capacity is not only unnecessary but results In ultimate failure. Extensive investi- gation and experiments under varied condi- tions have fully demonstrated that lands farmed properly can be improved and their producing capacity greatly increased. There Is no valid excuse for wornout farm lands, and where they are found It Is the fault of the man or his system and not of the land. i6i l62 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON The problem of soil fertility and how to maintain it has been a very vital one to all nations. The earliest agricultural literature mentions the use of manures and other refuse to make the soil more productive. In all the old countries the question of keeping up the soil fertility has been successfully met. This is evidenced by their being able to feed from the same lands the constantly increasing population. There are lands in some of the European countries that are producing, after more than one thousand years of cultivation, larger crops than ever before. The density of the population and the lack of room for expan- sion make it necessary to conserve all the re- sources, and especially that of the soil. In America there has been a very different situation. With a sparse rural population and a seemingly unlimited expanse of fertile virgin soil, the question of caring for or conserving the soil was lost sight of for a long time. It was not until recently that the constantly decreasing yield per acre of our soils was seriously considered. While the abuse of farm lands, idle fields, and tenantless homes are noticeable all over the country, these are SOIL IMPROVEMENT 163 even more marked in the cotton states. In no country or in any age has there been such a system of soil robbing as that practised on the Southern farm. The washed and barren hill- sides are the first things to attract the atten- tion of all travellers both foreign and native. Natural causes are, of course, partly responsible for these conditions. The mild, open winters, accompanied by frequent heavy rainfalls, with the naturally sandy loose soil, make washing easy. The principal causes are, however, shallow breaking and the system of clean cul- ture practised in cotton farming. With little humus in the soil to absorb the water and hold the particles together, erosion is the natural result. Farther north, where the soil is stiffer and the rainfall lighter, and with a more diversified system of cropping, soils do not wash so badly. Here also the surface soils are frozen for several months which makes washing impossible for a large part of the year. In the early days of commercial cotton grow- ing, when fertile lands were abundant and cheap and with slave labor to produce the crop it was considered more profitable to clear new fields when the old ones became 164 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON exhausted than to preserve the fertility of the soil. The logical result of such a system was the wearing out of the most desirable lands. Any system of cropping which does not return to the land the larger part of all that is grown on it, either in the shape of manure from live stock or by turning under the green crops, will soon result in unproductive soils. In some places, cotton has been grown on the same land for generations. This soil was evidently very fertile in the beginning or it would be so exhausted by now that it would not produce profitable crops. . Dr. B. T. Galloway, Chief of the Bureau of Plant Industry, once said, after visiting the Cotton States, that "When the Southern farmer learned to diversify and feed his soil by returning to it what it produced, a system of land robbing would give way to a system of land building." If only the lint were sold from the cotton farm, less fertility would be removed by it than any other crop known. By returning the seeds or their equivalent in manure or fertilizer, with all the other parts of the plant, there should be little soil deterioration from cotton farming. SOIL IMPROVEMENT 165 Five hundred pounds of lint cotton removes less than two pounds of nitrogen, about one half pound of phosphoric acid, and two and one half pounds of potash. The seed from a bale of cotton, approximately half a ton, con- tains thirty-one pounds of nitrogen, thirteen pounds of phosphoric acid, and twelve pounds of potash. At prevailing prices the seed from each bale of cotton grown removes more than $'j worth of plant food from the soil. When the farmer sells his seed without returning their equivalent in some other form of fertilizer he robs his land. It has been claimed by many of the best farmers, and with good reason, that the rapid deterioration of soils in the cotton States began with the construction of the oil mill. Before the day of the oil mill cotton seed were either fed to stock or used as fertil- izer. Since the introduction of the oil mill nearly all the seed are sold. The prices re- ceived are frequently below the actual fertil- izing value, and the money received is seldom spent for plant food to be returned to the soil. Before the oil mills came, the cotton seed were used as fertilizer for corn and it was a rare thing to know of a good farmer who bought 1 66 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON corn to run his farm. The high prices paid for seed in recent years have, to a large extent, robbed the farms of this Important fertilizer, and much of the money received for the cotton crop has gone to buy corn and other foodstuff. Analyses show that a ton of meal contains about as much plant food as two tons of raw seed; but the feeding value of a ton of cotton seed is equal to 1,400 pounds of meal. These facts should be considered when selling seed or exchanging them for meal. Methods of Restoring Soil Fertility. — Under the system of all cotton farming the lands have greatly deteriorated. The following methods are suggested for restoring and maintaining soil fertility on cotton farms: 1. Terrace hill lands to prevent washing, and drain swamp lands. 2. Grow leguminous crops and winter cover crops to fill the soil with humus and check erosion. 3. Adopt a systematic rotation of crops. 4. Keep live stock to consume all grain and forage crops and return the manure to the land. SOIL IMPROVEMENT 167 Drainage. — The first problem in soil build- ing on cotton farms is to check erosion on the hill land and drain the swamp land. On hill lands broad bed terraces are recommended. On bottom and wet lands, tile drainage, or some other effective method of ridding the soil of surplus water should be adopted. Be- fore any ditching, terracing or tiling is done, all gullies and rough places should be filled up and the land put in fair condition. This will make the work much easier and more effective. Before permanent terraces are built, grow one or two heavy crops of peas, or some other green crop which can be plowed un- der to add humus to the soil. This will help to take care of part of the surplus water. Broad embankment terraces of a width of fifteen feet, with a gradual fall of from four to six inches per one hundred feet, will carry the surplus water away gradually, allowing much of it to be taken up by the soil. These wide terraces will permit the growing of crops on all the land. When cultivated crops are planted, lay 1 68 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON off the rows parallel with the terrace, run- ning the first rows on top of the terrace and allowing short rows to come in the centre or on one side. The terrace bank should be made high enough in the beginning to avoid any possibility of overflowing or breaking while it is new and unsettled. The distance between the terraces can be determined by the lay of the land. Shorter distances will be necessary on steep lands and much wider space can be left on moderately rolling lands. The general rule is to allow a three-foot perpen- dicular fall between terraces. Before start- ing terraces see that there is a good outlet for the water. The laying out of terraces is a very simple matter, and can be done by almost any farmer with a little preliminary instruction. The implements used need not be expensive. A farm level can be bought for $12 or $15, or one that will answer the purpose can be made for $2 by buying a carpenter's level and attaching it to a frame made of light wood. More physical labor will be required to operate the home-made level, but good work can be done with it. SOIL IMPROVEMENT 169 On bottom lands and some rolling hill lands, tile drainage is the best method for taking care of the water. This eliminates all ditch banks and other obstructions. Green Manure Crops. — The next impor- tant step in soil building is to get more humus or vegetable matter incorporated in the soil. Undoubtedly the quickest and most effective way of doing this is by means of growing leguminous crops. If quick re- sults are desired, the whole of the crop should be turned under. This, perhaps, would be advisable for the first year, under any circumstances. The best crops for this purpose are cowpeas, soy beans, velvet beans, and, on land where they will grow, some of the clovers. The cowpeas will grow on almost any land in the Cotton Belt. The velvet bean can be grown anywhere in the Gulf States. The soy bean will be more beneficial perhaps in some places on ac- count of the diseases that affect the pea. Lespedeza, bur clover, and crimson clover can be grown on nearly all soils in the South. An application of lime will be helpful to the clovers on nearly all soils. 170 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON By growing legume crops in the summer, turning them under in the fall, and follow- ing with a crop of oats, rye, crimson or bur clover as a winter cover crop, the land will be fully protected throughout the year, and if all these crops are turned under the original fertility will be rapidly restored. After one or two years of this treatment the land may be turned over to the regular crops of cotton and corn. Of course, this is not specially applicable to soils that are already in fairly good condi- tion. Crop Rotations. — Rotation of crops is the safest and surest way of maintaining soil fertility. On every farm a systematic crop rotation should be adopted. This rotation will have to be planned to suit the condi- tions and the location of the farm. What would be good for one farm might not be th^ best for another, even in the same neighborhood. A few suggestive rotations are given, so that the farmer may have an idea of what is meant by systematic crop rotation. Following are suggested outlines of two, SOIL IMPROVEMENT 171 three, and four year rotations for cotton farms. The legume crops to be used with these rota- tions will vary in different sections and on different soils: TWO-YEAR ROTATION FIELD NO. I FIELD NO. 2 (ij-^ year) {ist year) Corn and cowpeas. Bur Cotton. Bur clover as win- clover as winter cover ter cover crop crop {2d year) {2d year) Cotton. Bur clover as Corn and cowpeas. Bur winter cover crop clover as winter cover crop Bur clover can be seeded on the cotton land from August 15th to October 15th, depending on the latitude. Seed should be sown in the bur. The clover will mature seed in the spring in time to prepare the land for corn. It will not be necessary to reseed this land the following fall. The land for cotton will have to be broken in the spring before the bur clover seeds, but there will usually be enough seed remaining in the soil from the past year to get a good stand of clover after the cotton. 172 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON Crimson clover Is the best of all cover crops where the soil has been inoculated. If crimson has not been grown on the farm before, only a small area should be planted at first, and It should be Inoculated by securing soil from a THREE-YEAR ROTATION FIELD NO. I FIELD NO. 2 FIELD NO. 3 {isi year) {isi year) (ist year) Cotton. Rye or crim- C&rn and peas Oats and peas son clover as winter cover crop (2(f year) (zd year) {2d year) Corn and peas Oats and peas Cotton. Rye or crim- son clover as winter 1 cover crop iid year) (id year) {3d year) Oats and peas Cotton. Rye or crimson clover as winter cover crop Corn and peas crimson clover field and scattering It over the land, at the rate of from 300 to 500 pounds per acre at the time of seeding. If soil cannot be secured from a crimson clover field, fairly satisfactory Inoculation may be obtained from the nitro-culture bacteria which are prepared by the U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, and also by some of the leading seed houses. Unless the soil has been Inoculated, It will be best to plant the cotton lands to rye for a winter cover crop. SOIL IMPROVEMENT 173 Lespedeza will make an excellent hay crop on good land in nearly all parts of the South. FOUR-YEAR ROTATION FIELD NO. I FIELD NO. 2 FIELD NO. 3 FIELD NO. 4 {ist year) (i.f/ year) iist year) (ist year) Cotton. Rye or Corn and peas Oats and les- Lespedeza crimson clover pedeza as winter cover crop (2d year) [zd year) (zd year) (zd year) Corn and peas Oats and les- Lespedeza Cotton. Rye or pedeza crimson clo- ver as winter cover crop (id year) (}d year) (}d year) (id year) Oats and lespe- Lespedeza Cotton. Rye or Corn and peas deza crimson clo- ver as winter cover crop {4th year) Utii year) (4ik year) (ith year) Lespedeza Cotton. Rye or Corn and peas Oats and les- crimson clo- pedeza ver as cover crop Lespedeza does not make sufficient growth on poor land to justify planting it as a hay crop. It should be sown the last of February or the first of March on the oat land. Run over the land after sowing seed with a dragtooth har- row, the teeth slanted backward at an angle of 45 degrees. One cutting of hay can be se- 174 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON cured and the lespedeza will reseed itself, and one cutting can be secured the following year. Lespedeza is a most excellent plant for im- proving the soil. In sections where it cannot be grown other crops can be substituted in the rotation. The above outlines of crop rotations are offered only as suggestions. Each farmer can, with a little study, plan a system best suited to his conditions. Farvi Manures. — The last but by no means the least important factor to be considered in building up the land and maintaining fertil- ity is that of farm manures. The practical and experimental results in the best farming countries have proven that soil fertility can- not be most economically maintained without the use of live stock. The keeping of sufficient live stock will allow the farmer to get two values for the heavier rough food products grown. He may first get the full feed value through the animal, and second the manure which can be returned to the land. The neglect in preserving and increasing the supply of farm manures has been a great drain on the American farm, especially in cotton-growing SOIL IMPROVEMENT 175 sections. The chief difference between barn- yard manure and other vegetable matter is that in the process of passing through the an- imal the fertilizing elements are made more available for absorption In plant growth. From 75 to 90 per cent, of the fertilizing value of the crop is left after it passes through the animal. Through neglect in caring for manures about the farm much of their fertility is lost. The Cornell University Experiment Station found that as much as 50 per cent, of the plant food constituents in manure was lost by leaching and unnecessary fermentation. The best plan for utilizing manures, where it can be done, is to haul and spread on the land regularly as it accumulates. Where there is no land available, and it is not practicable to do this at all seasons, some suitable shed or house should be provided that will thoroughly protect it from rain or exposure. One of the best plans for accumulating manures in stables or barns is to let it remain and be trampled by the stock. Always supply plenty of bedding to absorb all the liquids. This treatment will not only take up the moisture but the continued trampling of the animal will exclude all air, 176 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON SO that the accumulation may go on without injury to its quality until a convenient time to remove and spread it on the land. One can readily see that a large quantity of valuable fertilizer could be accumulated during the year with a limited number of animals when taken into consideration that each grown horse produces about 12,000 pounds and each cow about 20,000 pounds per year. When the straw and other litter is added to this the amount is largely increased. The actual plant food contained in one ton of barnyard manure is worth at least $2.50, and it is safe to say that the farmer will derive nearly $4 worth of good from it. It not only furnishes $2.50 worth of plant food but greatly improves the mechanical condition of the soil and multiplies beneficial bacteria. Some farmers prefer composting their ma- nures, but this, except in rare instances, is an additional expense without adding very much to the actual value of the manure. For special farming the compost heap has been found bene- ficial and may be made somewhat as follows: Locate the compost heap in an old shed; or build a shed, with any kind of cheap material 1. Crimson clover in central Alabama, sown October first, in cotton middles after first picking of cotton. Clover in full bloom April fifteenth 2. Corn and velvet beans. The velvet bean is a great forage and soil improving crop on the cotton farms of the Gulf Coast country •^^^ SOIL IMPROVEMENT 177 for a roof. Spread on the ground a layer of stable manure 8 by lo feet, six inches deep. Over this spread one hundred pounds of acid phosphate or ground phosphate rock. The ground phosphate rock answers about as well as the acid phosphate and costs about half as much. Continue these layers until all the manure is used up or until the pile has become conveniently high. To these layers might be added straw, leaves, mold, or other litter, add- ing one hundred pounds of ground phosphate rock to each ton of material used. Be sure to wet all thoroughly. When the heap is com- pleted cover it about four inches deep with good loam, or with forest mold, to prevent evaporation of the ammonia and other ele- ments. This should remain in the heap for several weeks, thoroughly mixing when cutting down, and before hauling to the field for ap- plication. The judicious use of commercial fertilizers in combination with barnyard manure and green crops will aid in soil building, and will be found profitable in the increased production of crops. With the best methods of conserving the 178 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON soil, and the best methods of tillage, the yield of all crops on the average cotton farm could be more than doubled. The average small yield of the cotton farm compared with what it might be is a heavy tax to pay for ignorance and careless management. How long shall we continue such methods? This is a question that must be answered, not only for our own good, but for posterity. Outlook for the Cotton Industry CHAPTER XIV OUTLOOK FOR THE COTTON INDUSTRY SOME apprehension has been expressed con- cerning the future of the cotton industry in the United States. The high prices of recent years and the demoralizing and de- structive effects on the crop in some sections by the boll weevil, have created uneasiness in the minds of the spinners. It is only natural that the spinner should desire a sufficient supply of cotton at moderate prices. Several European countries have spent large sums of money in efforts to grow cotton In their colonial pos- sessions that they might become independent of the American crop. They employed high salaried experts and expended millions of dollars; but so far have been unable to produce cotton of the desired standard and in competi- tion with the American crop. The Southern States have had a monopoly of cotton production, and it is probable that i8i I 82 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON they will continue to enjoy this distinction. The Mexican cotton boll weevil threatened the industry but, after two decades of experi- ence with this most destructive of all cotton pests, it has been demonstrated that cotton can still be grown profitably in the presence of the weevil. In fact, the crop has con- stantly increased during the past five years with more than half the cotton-producing territory infested. While there is little doubt that this troublesome pest will invade every field where cotton is grown, it is believed that it will become less destructive in the northern part of the Cotton Belt. It is also probable that natural enemies of the weevil and better cul- tural methods will reduce the damage in sections already infested. It is doubtful, how- ever, whether any territory once infested will ever be entirely rid of the weevil, though the danger of serious damage may be reduced except in years of unfavorable climatic con- ditions. There is little reason to believe that the United States will lose its supremacy in the production of cotton with their rich lands, not only adapted to cotton but to the greatest OUTLOOK FOR THE COTTON INDUSTRY 1 83 variety of useful farm crops; their magnificent forests of timber for building purposes; the great deposits of oil, coal, iron, phosphates, lime, and other minerals; with almost unlimited water power; and with a mild and healthful climate; but instead, every reason to believe there will be expansion and growth. Mr. Edward Atkinson, a large American spinner, after trying cotton imported from various foreign countries, stated that none of them were satisfactory and that no other country has a climate so peculiarly adapted to the growing of cotton as ours. He finally concluded that the South would perhaps have the monopoly for a long time. In his opinion only one section, which is situated in South America, could ever compete with the United States in growing the best grades of upland cotton. The English Government recently appointed a commission to investigate the possibilities of cotton production in Africa, and they reported in part as follows: "All efforts to raise cotton successfully elsewhere than in the southern part of the 184 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON United States have failed. This is the home of the cotton plant, and if it will grow and fruit elsewhere to the extent that the staple will have a substantial commercial value, the fact is yet to be demonstrated. It was ex- perimented with under different suns during and after the American Civil War and all the experiments failed. Providence has given the Southern farmer the monopoly of the indis- pensable cotton crop and he need not take fright when the price soars and there are heard threats of turning Africa, Egypt, and other countries into cotton fields, and making them furnish the world's supply." The rapidity with which the industry has grown in this country can be realized when we note that the total crop of the South thirty years ago was only four million bales; twenty years ago it was six million bales; ten years ago it was eight million bales, and the past three crops have averaged nearly fourteen million bales. Notwithstanding these three extraordinary crops, the average price per pound paid for them has been greater than at any time in thirty years. A world-wide move- OUTLOOK FOR THE COTTON INDUSTRY 1 85 ment toward a higher civilization and higher standards of living has largely increased the demand for cotton. It has been estimated that of the more than fifteen hundred million people on the earth, only one third are well clothed, one half are partly clothed, and the remainder go without clothing. Something like forty-two million bales would be necessary to clothe all of the people of the world as we are clothed. This fact indicates the immense room for expansion in cotton production. It is believed that the South can increase the cotton crop as rapidly as the world's demand grows. When we consider that in the cotton states but one acre in seventeen is devoted to cotton, and only one acre in eleven in the cotton counties, there seems to be good reason for this belief. The average yield per acre is now less than two hundred pounds of lint cotton; but some of the best farmers average from their entire farms from five hundred to eight hundred pounds per acre. This would indicate the possibility of immensely Increasing the crop, even were there no increase in acreage. The low yields in the South may be largely ascribed to the use of poor seed, run down, 1 86 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON depleted soils, and inefficient and inadequate teams and tools. The use of good seed alone has been known to increase the crop from 30 to 50 per cent., and it is conservative to assume that with the adoption of the latest methods in scientific farming the yields on the lands already devoted to cotton would be doubled. The acute problem confronting the Southern farmer to-day is the necessity of caring for his lands. This can be done by keeping live stock and rotating crops, and at the same time producing as much cotton as formerly on only half the acreage. Under such a sys- tem all of the supplies will be grown at home, and the cotton will be a surplus cash crop. The outlook is very hopeful to the close observer. Mr. Arthur W. Page, editor of the World's Work, in an article analyzing present condi- tions in the Southern States, said: "We are in sight of the time when the cotton grower in the old slave states will become the most prosperous tiller on the earth." The late Alfred B. Shepperson, author of "Cotton Facts," in an address entitled, "The Sources of Cotton Supply," before the New York University a few years ago, went into OUTLOOK FOR THE COTTON INDUSTRY 1 8/ details as to the future outlook and used the following in his closing paragraphs: "I am as thoroughly convinced of the utter futility of the attempts being made to grow cotton in the new fields of production as I am of the capacity of our Southern States to readily meet the increasing requirements of the spinners of Europe and America. Our European friends would do well to possess their souls in patience, and stop squandering their money in visionary schemes. Blessed with temperature, rainfall, better adapted to the successful culture of cotton than any other country, and with an abundance of land to meet every possible requirement for expansion of acreage, the United States will undoubtedly maintain in the future its present supremacy in the cotton production of the world." The Supply and Distribution of Cotton CHAPTER XV THE SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION OF COTTON THE total supply of cotton in the United States at the end of 191 1 was 17,896,226 bales. This represents cotton held over froma previous crop, and 229,268 bales Imported from various other countries. This is the largest supply this country has ever accumulated. The following table shows the production and distribution of the cotton crop of the United States from 1855 to 1911: Table VII. — Total crop, export, and domestic con- sumption OF United States cotton crop for special YEARS ■STEAR TCTEAL COMMERCIAL CROP TOTAL EXPORT TAKING NORTHERN TAKING SOUTHERN MILLS MILLS I8SS 3>66s,ss7 2,702,863 633,000 138,000 i860...... 3,849,469 615,032 650,000 193,000 i86s....... 2,269,216 1,301,146 541,000 127,000 1870. ...... 4,024,527 2,922,257 1,072,000 91,000 187s....... 4,302,818 3,037,650 1,220,000 134,000 1880. ...... 6,356,998 4,451,495 1,713,000 225,000 i88s 6,369,341 4,200,651 1,781,000 381,000 1890 8,562,089 5,580,319 2,027,000 613,000 192 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON YEAR TOTAL COMMERCIAL CROP TOTAL EXPORT TAKING NORTHERN MILLS TAKING SOUTHERN MILLS 189s 7,146,779 4.761,505 1,605,000 900,000 1900 10,266,527 6,806,572 1,904,000 1,583,000 I9OS 10,804,556 6.975,494 2,33S,ooo 2,292,000 1906 13.595,498 8,825,236 2,510,000 2,495,000 1907 11,375,461 7.779.508 1,885,000 2,079,000 1908 13,587,306 8,889,724 2,688,000 2,555,000 1909 10,315,382 6,491,843 2,012,000 2,244,000 I9IO 12,005,688 8,008,195 1,994,000 2,307,000 I9II 16,250,276 10,681,332 2,619,000 2,772,000 Table VIII. — Cotton acreage harvested, production AND yield lint PER ACRE AND PRICE IN THE UnITED States, for selected years, i 879-191 i 1911 1910 1909 1908 1907 1906 1905 1904 1903 1902 1901 1900 1899 1898 1897 1896 189s 1894 1893 1889 1884 1879 TOTAL ACREAGE 36. 32. 32. 32, 3I: 31 26, 30 28: 27, 27; 25. 24: 24: 24: 23, 20, 123, 9: 20, 17: 14, ,045,000 ,403,000 ,044,000 ,444,000 ,311,000 ,374,000 .117,153 .053,739 ,016,893 ,114,103 ,220,414 758,139 .275,101 .967.295 .319,584 ,273,209 184,808 687,950 525,000 175,270 439,612 480,019 TOTAL CROP BALES 16,109,349 11,965,962 10,386,209 13,432,131 11,325,882 13,305,265 10,725,602 13.697,310 10,015,721 10,784,473 9,748,546 10,245,602 9,507,786 11,189,205 10,897,857 8,532,70s 7,161,094 9,901,251 7,493,000 7,472,511 5,682,000 5,755,359 YIELD LINT PER ACRE 175 >^ 195 175 205 205 215 175 195 195 20s 220 240 235 195 175 205 190 18s 163 195 PRICE CENTS PER POUND • 9 • S 8.4 lo.s 12.0 SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION 193 World's Production of Cotton ( U. S. Census) . — Cotton can be grown over a wide area of the earth's surface, but its profitable production is limited to certain well-defined sections. For some countries satisfactory data regarding the production of cotton are not available. The following table, showing production by countries, from 1907 to 1911 inclusive, is believed to approximate the facts. Table IX. — Production of cotton for mill consump- tion, BY countries, 1907 TO IQII COTTON PRODUCTION (BALES OF 5OO POUNDS NET) I9II I9IO 1909 1908 1907 Total 22,297,000 18,711,000 16,777,000 19,636,000 16,512,000 U. S British India. . . Egypt .... Russia. . . . China Brazil Peru Turkey . . . Mexico. . . Persia .... All other countries 15,546,000 2,514,000 1,450,000 1,200,000 625,000 320,000 128,000 124,000 100,000 80,000 210,000 11,483,000 3,082,000 1,506,000 900,000 775,000 3 10,000 128,000 105,000 135,000 92,000 195,000 9,863,000 3,774,000 911,000 720,000 600,000 360,000 107,000 32,000 125,000 90,000 195,000 13,002,000 2,953,000 1,275,000 846,000 600,000 425,000 80,000 80,000 140,000 50,000 185,000 10,882,000 2,498,000 1,296,000 620,000 426,000 370,000 55. 000 80,000 70,000 50,000 165,000 The average production for mill consumption during the five years shown in the table was 18,787,000 bales, or 3,510,000 bales less than 194 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON the production of 191 1. In addition to the amounts shown in the table, large quantities of the fiber are produced in some countries and consumed in the homes of the people, without entering commercial channels; but the amount of such cotton cannot be estimated with any degree of accuracy. fropoftion oJtotoX eongumptum, by covntria {}/tcT.nding Auguu 3t, Diagram I Diagram II The relative importance of the several cotton-producing countries is graphically presented in Diagram I. Of the total production of commercial cotton in 191 1, the United States contributed 69.7 per cent.; British India, 11. 3 per cent.; Egypt, 6.5 per cent.; and Russia, 5.4 per cent. The relative importance of the several countries in the consumption of cotton is shown in Diagram II. Supplement \ SUPPLEMENT There are many agencies now organized for the purpose of giving practical and scientific information to the farmer in helping him solve his problems. Among these are the State Agricultural Colleges and Experiment Stations, the Industrial and Agricultural Agents em- ployed by the railroads, the U. S. Depart- ment of Agriculture through its Demonstration Agents and other employees, and the Editors of Agricultural Papers. DIRECTORS OF UNITED STATES AGRICULT- URAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS IN THE COTTON BELT ALABAMA J. F. Guggar, Director, College Station, Auburn. L. H. Moore, Director, Canebrake Station, Uniontown. G. W. Carver, Director, Tuskeegee Station, Tuskeegee Inst. ARKANSAS C. F. Adams, Director, State Station, Fayetteville. CALIFORNIA T. F. Hunt, Director, State Station, Berkeley. 197 198 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON FLORIDA P. H. Rolfs, Director, Gainesville. GEORGIA R. J. H. DeLoach, Director, Experiment. HAWAII E. V. Wilcox (Special Agent in Charge), Federal Station, Honolulu. C. F. Eckart, Director, Sugar Planters' Station, Honolulu. ILLINOIS E. Davenport, Director, Urbana. ISLAND OF GUAM John B. Thompson(Special Agent in)pharge), Guam. KANSAS W. M. Jardine, Director (Acting), Manhattan. KENTUCKY J. H. Kastle, Director, Lexington. LOUISIANA W. R. Dodson, Director, State Station, Baton Rouge. W. R. Dodson, Director, Sugar Station, New Orleans. W. R. Dodson, Director, N. Louisiana Station, Calhoun. W. R. Dodson, Director, Rice Exp. Station, Crowley. MISSISSIPPI E. R. Lloyd, Director, Agricultural College. MISSOURI F. B. Mumford, Director, College Station, Columbia. P. Evans, Director, Fruit Station, Mountain Grove. NEW MEXICO Fabian Garcia, Director, State College. SUPPLEMENT I99 NORTH CAROLINA B. W. Kilgore, Director, College Station, W. Raleigh. B. W. Kilgore, Director, State Station, Raleigh. OKLAHOMA J. A. Wilson, Director, Stillwater. PORTO RICO D. W. May, (Special Agent in Charge), Federal Station, Mayaguez. J. T. Crawley, Director, Sugar Producers' Station, Rio Piedras. SOUTH CAROLINA J. N. Harper, Director, State Station, Clemson College. TENNESSEE H. A. Morgan, Director, State Station, Knoxville. TEXAS B. Youngblood, Director, State Station, College Station. VIRGINIA S. W. Fletcher, Director, State Station, Blacksburg. T. C. Johnson, Director, Truck Station, Norfolk. INDUSTRIAL AND DEMONSTRATION AGENTS EMPLOYED BY THE RAILROADS Southern Railroad — Department of Farm Improvement Work T. 0. Plunkett, Manager, Atlanta, Ga. ASSISTANT managers R. E. Grabel, Charlotte, N. C. W. D. Clayton, Chattanooga, Tenn. Roland Turner, Meridian, Miss. 200 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON FIELD AGENTS W. M. Brown, Manassas, Va. R. O. McCord, Danville, Va. W. E. Perry, Greensboro, N. C. J. H. Hendricks, Columbia, S. C. R. A. Stratford, Hazlehurst, Ga. T. E. Waldrup, Valdosta, Ga. Frank Shorter, West Point, Va. George Reese, Atlanta, Ga. S. A. Miller, Johnson City, Tenn. B. M. Anderson, Knoxville, Tenn. T. J. Griffith, Danville, Ky. C. C. Prescott,^Ji4rriman, Tenn. C. R. Shepherd, Attalla, Ala. V. P. Atkinson, Tuscumbia, Ala. J. M. Draper, Anniston, Ala. T. U. Culver, Maplesville, Ala. H. L. Hopper, Tuscaloosa, Ala. D. D. Malone, Jackson, Tenn. S. M. Byars, Corinth, Miss. W. C. Proctor, Itta Bena, Miss. E. B. Randle, West Point, Miss. E. E. Burrows, Okolona, Miss. A. H. Moorman, Lauderdale, Miss. R. V. Jarrott, Waynesboro, Miss. J. G. Shand, Thomasville, Ala. F. S. Long, Cuba, Ala. H. C. Bates, Akron, Ala. W. E. Birch, Asheville, N. C. A. H. Chapman, Greenville, S. C. LIVE STOCK AGENT F. L. Word, Atlanta, Ga. SUPPLEMENT 20I ASSISTANT LIVE STOCK AGENTS Dr. Walter Sorrell, Greensboro, N. C. Dr. C. D. Lowe, Morristown, Tenn. Dr. Charles J. Becker, Birmingham, Ala. DAIRY AND POULTRY AGENT Dr. C. M. Morgan, Atlanta, Ga. ASSISTANT DAIRY AND POULTRY AGENTS C. T. Rice, Greensboro, N. C. Walter W. Fitzpatrick, Atlanta, Ga. F. H. Denniss, Columbus, Miss. C. A. Hutton, Knoxville, Tenn. G. W. Humphrey, Birmingham, Ala. Carlton Ball, St. Louis, Mo. MARKET AGENTS J. M. Seahorn, Atlanta, Ga. E. M. Lane, Cincinnati, Ohio. E. L. Robison, St. Louis, Mo. M. M. Emmert, Washington, D. C. Central of Georgia Railway J. F. Jackson, Agricultural Agent, Savannah, Ga. T. G. Chastain, Agriculturist, Savannah, Ga. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Wilbur McCoy, Agricultural and Immigration Agent, Jacksonville, Fla. Seaboard Air Line Railway J. A. Pride, General Industrial Agent, Norfolk, Va. H. T. Prosser, Agricultural Agent, Hamlet, N. C. J. W. Scott, Agricultural Agent, Hamlet, N. C. E. D. Mays, Agricultural Agent, Jacksonville, Fla. A. P. Fant, Asst. Industrial Agent, Jacksonville, Fla. 202 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON Louisville and Nashville Railroad G. A. Park, General Immigration and Industrial Agent, Louisville, Ky. L. H. Lister, Agricultural Agent, Bay Minette, Ala. T. E. McElroy, Agricultural Agent, Columbia, Tenn. John Lister, Agricultural Agent, Pensacola, Fla. Karl R. Wundt, Agricultural Agent, Etowah, Tenn. William James, Agricultural Agent, Montgomery, Ala. S. A. Scott, Agricultural Agent, Foley, Ala. Gulf and Ship Island Railroad F. H. Lister, Ind. and Immigration Agent, Gulfport, Miss. J. J. Taylor, Agricultural Agent, McHenry, Miss. Illinois Central Railroad J. C. Clair, Industrial and Immigration Commissioner, Chicago, 111. Charles N. Brumfield, Agriculturist, Memphis, Tenn. Kansas City Southern Railway J. Hollister TuU, Agriculturist, Mena, Ark. Frisco Lines W. L. English, Supervisor of Agriculture, St. Louis, Mo. E. G. Barnard, Farm Demonstrator, Oklahoma City, Okla. N. T. McAlister, Farm Demonstrator, Springfield, Mo. B. W. White, Farm Demonstrator, Springfield, Mo. D. C. Cornman, Farm Demonstrator, St. Louis, Mo. H. H. Harrington, Agricultural Director Kingsville, Texas. Theo. Kreuz, Demonstration Agent, Kingsville, Texas. Missouri, Kansas, and Texas Railway Company OF Texas T. L. Peeler, Industrial Commissioner, Dallas, Texas. R. W. Hockaday, Industrial Commissioner, St. Louis, Mo. SUPPLEMENT 203 St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. W. R. Beattie, Agricultural Commissioner, St. Louis, Mo. P. T. Cole, Assistant Agricultural Commissioner, St. Louis, Mo. L. E. Saupe, Assistant, St. Louis, Mo. C. C. Rockenbach, Assistant, St. Louis, Mo. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. H. M. Bainer, Agriculturist, Amarillo, Texas. J. D. Tinsley, Agriculturist, Brownwood, Texas. Missouri Pacific Railway G. K.Andrews, Agricultural Commissioner, St. Louis, Mo. St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway L. A. Markham, Agricultural Commissioner, Little Rock, Ark. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. and International and Great Northern Railway Co. R. R. Claridge, Agricultural Commissioner, Longview> Texas. Rock Island Lines H. M. Cottrell, Agricultural Commissioner, Chicago, 111. (736 La Salle St. Station). E. R. Bennett, Horticulturist, Little Rock, Ark. Sunset Central Route (Including Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Rail- way Co., Texas & New Orleans Railroad Co., Hous- ton & Texas Central Railroad Co., Houston, East & West Texas Railroad Co., Houston & Shreveport Railroad Co.) H. P. Attwater, Agricultural Agent, Houston, Texas. W. P. Young, Agricultural Agent, Houston, Texas. 204 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON New Orleans, Mobile & Chicago Railroad Co. L. L. Lawrence, Manager Agricultural and Industrial Department, Laurel, Miss. H. H. Bolton, Agricultural and Immigration Agent, Mobile, Ala. EDITORS OF AGRICULTURAL PAPERS G. F. Hunnicutt, Editor, Southern Cultivator, Atlanta, Ga. R. A. Niven, Editor, Southern Farming, Atlanta, Ga. J. S. Cates, Editor, Southern Planter, Richmond, Va. Editor, Farmers^ Union Sun, Columbia, S. C. L.C. Neele, Editor, Southern -(^gnVw/^Mmi, Nashville,Tenn. Dr. H. E. Stockbridge, Editor, Southern Ruralist, Atlanta, Ga. W. C. Stubbs, Editor, The Louisiana Planter, New Orleans, La. R. J. Nelson, Editor, Farm and Ranch, Dallas, Texas. D. N. Barrow, Editor, Texas Farmer, Dallas, Texas. John Fields, Editor, Oklahoma Farm Journal, Oklahoma City, Okla. Edgar A. Wright, Editor, The Florida Grower, Tampa, Fla. E. O. Wild, Editor, Gulf States Farmer, New Orleans, La. Clarence H. Poe, Editor, Progressive Farmer, Raleigh, N. C. Dr. Tate Butler, Editor, Progressive Farmer, Memphis, Tenn. John Small, Editor, Arkansas Homestead, Little Rock, Ark. DEMONSTRATION AGENTS OF THE U. S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE The Farmers' Cooperative Demonstration Work, organized by the U. S. Department of Agriculture, now SUPPLEMENT 2O5 has an Agricultural Agent in nearly every county in the South, This work is now being carried on by the U. S. Department of Agriculture in cooperation with the State Agricultural Colleges and the State Departments of Agriculture. Farmers desiring information on agricultural subjects can address communications to: Mr. Bradford Knapp, Special Agent in Charge, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washington, D. C. Mr. J. A. Evans, General Assistant, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washington, D. C. Mr. W. B. Mercier, Agriculturist and Field Agent for the states of Louisiana, Arkansas, and Tennessee, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washington, D. C. H. E. Savely, Agriculturist and Field Agent for the states of Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Mississippi, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washington, D. C. Mr. E. Gentry, Agriculturist and Field Agent for the states of Oklahoma and Texas, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washington, D. C. ■ , Agriculturist and Field Agent for the states of North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washing- ton, D. C. STATE AND DISTRICT AGENTS IN THE FARMERS' COOPERATIVE DEMONSTRA- TION WORK, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ALABAMA B. L. Moss, State Agent, 701 Bell Building, Montgomery, Ala. A. D. Whitehead, District Agent, Greenville, Ala. 2o6 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON J. T. Watt, District Agent, Talladega, Ala. W. L. Lett, District Agent, 701 Bell Building, Mont- gomery, Ala. ARKANSAS C. W. Watson, State Agent, Little Rock, Ark. J. C. Barnett, District Agent, Little Rock, Ark. R. C. Davidson, District Agent, Little Rock, Ark. W. F. Haden, District Agent, Little Rock, Ark. FLORIDA A. S. Meharg, State Agent, Lakeland, Fla. W. L. Watson, District Agent, Live Oak, Fla. GEORGIA J. Phil. Campbell, State Agent, Athens,'"Ga. W. O. Cornelius, District Agent, Cedartown, Ga. S. M. Cown, District Agent, Union City, Ga. G. V. Cunningham, District Agent, Tifton, Ga. J. W. Hendricks, District Agent, Savannah, Ga. J. G. Oliver, District Agent, Macon, Ga. LOUISIANA Mason Snowden, State Agent, Shreveport, La. L. M. Calhoun, District Agent, Gilbert, La. L. E. Perrin, District Agent, St. Landry, La. J. E. Wemple, District Agent, Arcadia, La. MARYLAND Dr. Augustus Stabler, District Agent, Bureau of Plant Industry, Washington, D. C. MISSISSIPPI R. S. Wilson, State Agent, Columbus, Miss. J. W. Willis, District Agent, Grenada, Miss. P. P. Garner, District Agent, West Jackson, Miss. SUPPLEMENT 2O7 NORTH CAROLINA C. R. Hudson, State Agent, Raleigh, N. C. T. E. Browne, District Agent, Ahoskie, N. C. T. D. McLean, District Agent, Carthage, N. C. E, S. Millsaps, District Agent, Statesville, N. C. OKLAHOMA W. D. Bentley, State Agent, Yukon, Okla. J. M. Daily, District Agent, Muskogee, Okla. F. F. Ferguson, District Agent, Minco, Okla. SOUTH CAROLINA W. W. Long, State Agent, Clemson College, S. C. L. L. Baker, District Agent, Bishopville, S. C. W. H. Barton, District Agent, Simpsonville, S. C W. R. Elliott, District Agent, Winnsboro, S. C. TENNESSEE H. D. Tate, State Agent, 909 Stahlman Building, Nash- ville, Tenn. J. M. Dean, District Agent, Columbia, Tenn. H. S. Nichols, District Agent, Jackson, Tenn. C. F. Striplin, District Agent, Maryville, Tenn. TEXAS W. F. Proctor, State Agent, College Station, Texas. J. L. Quicksall, Asst. State Agent, 1808 S. 12th Street, Waco, Texas. William Ganzer, District Agent, Denton, Texas. M. T. Payne, District Agent, Temple, Texas. G. W. Orms, District Agent, Mineola, Texas. T. O. Walton, District Agent, Livingston, Texas. 208 KNAPP METHOD OF GROWING COTTON T. O. Sandy, State Agent, Burkeville, Va. F. S. Farrar, District Agent, Jetersville, Va. W. P. Moore, District Agent, Forest Depot, Va. W. C. Shackleford, District Agent, Proffit, Va. THE END OCT 8 1918 JBRARY OF C JO N G R ESi aDDm3i7T4h