Class. 0OPXNGHT DETOSm THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION By GEORGE D. STRAYER AND FRANK P. BACHMAN GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD 61 Broadway New York 1918 x> ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS The results of the study of the Gary Public Schools, undertaken on the invitation of the Super- intendent and the Board of Education of Gary, will be published in eight parts, as follows: The Gary Schools : A General Account By Abraham Flexner and Frank P. Bachman (25 Cents) Organization and Administration George D. Strayer and Frank P. Bachman (is Cents) Costs Frank P. Bachman and Ralph Bowman (25 Cents) Industrial Work Charles R. Richards (2S Cents) Household Arts Eva W. White (10 Cents) Physical Training and Play Lee F. Hanmer (10 Cents) Science Teaching Otis W. Caldwell (10 Cents) Measurement of Classroom Products Stuart A. Courtis (30 Cents) Any report will he sent postpaid on receipt of the amount above specified. THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION BY GEORGE D. STRAYER AND FRANK P. BACHMAN GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD 61 Bboadway New York 1918 COPYRIGHT, 19 1 8, BY General Education Board ©CI.A506853 DEC -5 1918 /V\ CONTENTS PAGE Introduction vii I. Present Day Problems 3 II. Program 9 III. Plant 23 IV. Organization 41 V. Use of Plant 59 VI. Supervision and Administration . . 89 VII. Comparative Cost 109 VIII. Appendix 127 INTRODUCTION The Gary Plan In the last few years both laymen and professional educators have engaged in a lively controversy as to the merits and defects, advantages and disadvantages of what has come to be called the Gary idea or the Gary plan. The rapidly increasing literature bearing on the subject is, however, deficient in details and too often partisan in tone. The present study was undertaken by the General Education Board at the request of the Gary school authorities for the purpose of presenting an accurate and comprehensive account of the Gary schools in their significant aspects. In the several volumes in which the main features of the Gary schools are separately considered, the reader will observe that, after presenting facts, each of the authors discusses or — in technical phrase — attempts to evaluate the Gary plan from the angle of his particular interest. Facts were gathered in a patient, painstaking, and objective fashion; and those who want facts, and facts only, will, it is believed, find them in the descriptive and statistical portions of the respective studies. But the successive volumes will discuss principles, as well as viS INTRODUCTION state facts. That is, the authors will not only describe the Gary schools in the frankest manner, as they found them, but they will also endeavor to interpret them in the light of the large educational movement of which they are part. An educational conception may be sound or unsound; any particular effort to embody an educa- tional conception may be adequate or inadequate, effec- tive or ineffective. The public is interested in knowing whether the Gary schools as now conducted are efficient or inefficient; the pubHc is also interested in knowing whether the plan as such is sound or unsound. The present study tries to do justice to both points. What is the Gary plan? Perhaps, in the first instance, the essential features of the Gary plan can be made clear, if, instead of trying to tell what the Gary plan is, we teU what it is not. Ex- cept for its recent origin and the unusual situation as respects its foreign population, Gary resembles many other industrial centers that are to be found throughout the country. Now, had Gary provided itself with the type of school commonly found in other small industrial American towns, we should find there half a dozen or more square brick "soap-box" buildings, each accom- modating a dozen classes pursuing the usual book studies, a playground, with little or no equipment, perhaps a basement room for manual training, a laboratory, and a cooking room for the girls. Had Gary played safe, this is the sort of school and school equipment that it would now possess. Provided with this conventional school INTRODUCTION iz system, the town would have led a conventional school Hfe — quiet, unoffending, and negatively happy — doing as many others do, doing it about as well as they do it and satisfied to do just that. As contrasted with education of this meager type, the Gary plan is distinguished by two features, intimately connected with each other: First — the enrichment and diversification of the curriculum ; Second — the administrative de\ice that, for want of a better name, will be tentatively termed the duplicate school organization. These two features must first be considered in general terms, if the reader is to understand the detailed descrip- tion and discussion. As to the curriculum and school activities. While the practice of education has in large part continued to follow traditional paths, the progressive hterature of the subject has abounded in constructive suggestions of far-reaching practical significance. Social, political, and industrial changes have forced upon the school responsibilities formerly laid upon the home. Once the school had mainly to teach the elements of knowledge; now the school is charged with the physical, mental, and social training of the child. To meet these needs a changed and enriched curriculum, including community activities, facihties for recreation, shop work, and house- hold arts, has been urged on the content side of school work; the transformation of school aims and discipline X INTRODUCTION on the basis of modem psychology, ethics, and social philosophy has been for similar reasons recommended on the side of attitude and method. These things have been in the air. Every one of them has been tried and is being practised in some form or other, somewhere or other. In probably every large city in the country efforts have been made, especially in the more recent school plants, to develop some of the features above mentioned. There has been a distinct, unmistakable, and general trend toward making the school a place where children "live" as well as "learn." This movement did not originate at Gary; nor is Gary its only evidence. It is none the less true that perhaps no- where else have the schools so deliberately and explicitly avowed this modern policy. The Gary schools are offi- cially described as "work, study, and play" schools — schools, that is, that try to respond adequately to a many- sided responsibility; how far and with what success, the successive reports of the Gary survey wiU show. It must not, however, be supposed that the enriched curriculum was appHed in its present form at the out- set or that it is equally well developed in all the Gary schools. Far from it. There has been a distinct and uneven process of development at Gary; sometimes, as subsequent chapters will show, such rapid and unstable development that our account may in certain respects be obsolete before it is printed. When the Emerson school was opened in 1909, the equipment in laboratories, shops, and museums, while doubtless superior to what INTRODUCTION xi was offered by other towns of the Gary type, could have been matched by what was to be found in many of the better favored larger towns and cities at the same period. The gymnasium, for example, was not more than one third its present size; the industrial work was not un- precedented in kind or extent; the boys had woodwork, the girls cooking and sewing. But progress was rapid: painting and printing were added in 191 1; the foundry, forge, and machine shop in 1913. The opportunities for girls were enlarged by the addition of the cafeteria in 1913. The auditorium reached its present extended use as recently as the school year 19 13-14. The Froebel school, first occupied in the fall of 19 12, started with facilities similar to those previously introduced piecemeal into the Emerson. These faciKties, covering in their development a period of years, represent the effort to create an elementary school more nearly adequate to the needs of modern urban life. The curriculum is enriched by various ac- ti\-ities in the fields of industry, science, and recreation. Questions as to the efficiency with which these varied activities have been administered will be discussed by the various contributors to the present study. Mean- while, it is perhaps only fair to point out that the modem movement calls not only for additions to, but elimina- tions from, the curriculum and for a critical attitude toward the products of classroom teaching. How far, on the academic side, the Gary schools reflect this aspect of the modern movement will also presently appear. xii INTRODUCTION The administrative device — the "duplicate" organiza- tion, noted above as the second characteristic feature of the Gary plan — stands on a somewhat different footing, as the following considerations m.ake plain. Once more, Mr. Wirt was not the inventor of the in- tensive use of school buildings, though he was among the first — if not the very first — to perceive the purely educa- tional advantage to which the situation could be turned. The rapidity with which American cities have grown has created a difficult problem for school administrators — the problem of providing space and instruction for chil- dren who increase in number faster than buildings are constructed. The problem has been handled in various ways. In one place, the regular school day has been shortened and two different sets of children attending at different hours have been taught daily in one building and by one group of teachers. Elsewhere, as in certain liigh schools, a complete double session has been con- ducted. The use of one set of schoolrooms for more than one set of children each day did not therefore originate at Gary. Another point needs to be considered before we discuss the so-called duplicate feature of the Gary plan. In American colleges, subjects have commonly been taught by specialists, not by class teachers. The work is "de- partmentalized" — to use the technical term. There is a teacher of Latin, a teacher of mathematics, a teacher of physics, who together instruct every class — not a separate teacher of each class in all subjects. Latterly, INTRODUCTION xiii departmentalization has spread from the college into the high school, until nowadays well organized high schools and the upper grades of elementary schools are quite generally "departmentalized," i.e., organized with special teachers for the several subjects, rather than with one teacher for each grade. Out of these two elements, Gary has evolved an admin- istrative device, the so-called duplicate school, which, from the standpoint of its present educational signifi- cance, does indeed represent a definite innovation. For the sake of clearness, it will be well to explain the theory of the duphcate school by a simplified imaginary example : Let us suppose that elementary school facilities have to be provided for, say, i,6oo children. If each class is to contain a maximum of 40 children, a schoolhouse of 40 rooms would formerly have been built, with perhaps a few additional rooms, little used, for special activities; except during the recess (12 to 1:30) each recitation room would be in practically continuous use in the old- line subjects from 9 to 3 :^o, when school is adjourned till next morning. A school plant of this kind may be represented by Figure I, each square representing a schoolroom. The "duplicate" school proposes a different solution. Instead of providing 40 classrooms for 40 classes, it requires 20 classrooms, capable of holding 800 children; and further, playgrounds, laboratories, shops, gardens, gymnasium, and auditorium, also capable of holding XIV INTRODUCTION 800 children. If, now, 800 children use the classrooms while 800 are using the other facilities, morning and after- noon, the entire plant accommodates 1,600 pupils throughout the school day ; and the curriculum is greatly enriched, since, without taking away anything from their classroom work, they are getting other branches also. A school thus equipped and organized may be represented FIGURE I REPRESENTS OLD-FASHIONED SCHOOLHOUSE 40 rooms for 40 classes, of 40 children each, 1. e., facilities for the academic instruc- tion of 1,600 children. A school yard and an extra room or two, little used, for special activities, are also usually found. by Figure II, in which A represents 20 classes taking care of 40 children each (800 children) , and B represents special facilities taking care of 800 children. As A and B are in simultaneous operation, 1,600 children are cared for. This method of visualizing the "duplicate" school serves to correct a common misconception. The plan aims to intensify the use of schoolrooms; yet it would be INTRODUCTION XV incorrect to say that 20 classrooms, instead of 40, as under the old plan, accommodate 1,600 children. For while the number of classrooms has been reduced from 40 to 20, special facilities of equal capacity have been added in the form of auditorium, shops, play- ground, etc. The 20 classrooms apparently saved FIGURE n REPRESENTS THE GARY EQUH'MENT 20 classrooms for academic instruction of 20 classes of 40 children each (800 chil- dren) in the morning hours and an equal number in the afternoon (i ,600 in aU daily) B Special facilities, taking care of 800 chil- dren in the morning hours and an equal number in the afternoon hours (i ,600 in all daily) Auditorium Shops Laboratories Playground, gardens, gymnasium and library have been replaced by special facilities of one kind or another. The so-called duplicate organization and the longer school day make it possible to give larger facilities to twice as many children as the classrooms alone would accommodate. The duplicate school, as devel- oped at Gary, is not therefore a device to relieve conges- tion or to reduce expense, but the natural result of efforts to provide a richer school life for aU children. xvi INTRODUCTION The enriched curriculum and the duplicate organ- ization support each other. The social situation re- quires a scheme of education fairly adequate to the entire scope of the child's activities and possibihties; this cannot be achieved without a longer school day and a more varied school equipment. The dupKcate school endeavors to give the longer day, the richer curriculum, and the more varied activities with the lowest possible investment in, and the most intensive use of, the school plant. The so-called dupHcate school is thus a single school with two different t}^es of facihties in more or less constant and simultaneous operation, morning and afternoon. Such is the Gary plan in conception. What about the execution? Is it reahzed at Gary? Does it work? What is involved as respects space, investment, etc., when ordinary classrooms are replaced by shops, play- grounds, and laboratories? Can a given equipment in the way of auditorium, shops, etc., handle precisely the same number of children accommodated in the class- rooms without doing violence to their educational needs on the one hand, and without waste through temporary disuse of the special facihties, on the other? To what extent has Gary modified or reorganized on modern lines the treatment of the common classroom subjects? How efficient is instruction in the usual academic studies as well as in the newer or so-called modem subjects and activities? Is the plan economical in the sense that equal educational advantages caimot be procured by INTRODUCTION rvii any other scheme except at greater cost? These and other questions as to the execution of the Gary plan are, as far as data were obtainable, discussed in the separate volumes making up the present survey. The concrete questions above mentioned do not, how- ever, exhaust the educational values of a given school situation. From every school system there come im- ponderable products, bad as well as good. Aside from all else, many observers of the Gary schools report one such imponderable in the form of a spiritual something which can hardly be included in a study of administra- tion and eludes the testing of classroom work. These observers have no way of knowing whether Gary school costs are high or low ; whether the pupils spell and add as well as children do elsewhere; but, however these things may be, they usually describe the pupils as characterized by self-possession, resourcefulness, and happiness to an unusual degree. While different schools and indeed different parts of the same school vary in this respect, the members of the survey staff agree that, on the whole, there is a basis of fact for these observations. Gary is thus something more than a school organization charac- terized by the two main features above discussed. The reason is not far to seek. Innovation is stimu- lating, just as conformity is deadening. Experiment is in this sense a thing wholesome in itself. Of course it must be held to strict accountability for results; and this study is the work of persons who, convinced of the necessity of educational progress, are at the same time xviii INTRODUCTION solicitous that the outcome be carefully observed. The fact that customary school procedure does not rest upon a scientific basis, does not willingly submit itself to thorough scrutiny, is no reason for exempting educa- tional innovations from strict accountability. The very reverse is indeed true ; for otherwise innovation may im- peril or sacrifice essential educational values, without actually knowing whether or not it has achieved definite values of its own. Faith in a new program does not absolve the reformer from a watchful and critical atti- tude toward results. Moreover, if the innovator for- mulates his purposes in definite terms and measures his results in the Hght of his professed aims, the conservative cannot permanently escape the same process. Gary, like all other educational experiments, must be held account- able in this fashion. Subject however to such ac- countabiUty, the breaking of the conventional school framework, the introduction of new subject matter or equipment, even administrative reorganization, at Gary as elsewhere, tend to favor a fresher, more vigorous interest and spirit. Defects will in the following pages be pointed out in the Gary schools — defects of organization, of ad- ministration, of instruction. But there is for the reasons just suggested something in the Gary schools over and above the Gary plan. Problems abound, as in every living and developing situation. But the problems are the problems of life, and, as such, are in the long run perhaps more hopeful than the relatively smooth functioning of a stationary school system. Thus, not- INTRODUCTION xiz withstanding the defects and shortcomings which this study will candidly point out, the experiment at Gary rightly observed and interpreted is both interesting and stimulating. ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION I. PRESENT DAY PROBLEMS POPULAR interest in Gary's educational experi- ment arises in large measure from the effort at Gary to deal with some of the pressing problems of public education. It is well, therefore, before de- scribing the organization and administration of the Gary schools to review briefly the main problems with which boards of education and superintendents are now con- fronted. The more important of these may be stated as follows : (i) How may the elementary curriculum be mod- ernized so as to provide adequately for : (a) The intellectual, moral, social, and industrial demands of a democratic society? (b) Individual differences in physical endow- ment, mental ability, interests, and vocational out- look? (2) How may schools with modernized programs be organized so as to procure a maximum of teaching effi- ciency? (3) Can schools be provided with the buildings, the facilities, and the teachers required by a modern program and be maintained with such funds as an Ameri- can municipality will furnish? 3 4 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Let us consider briefly the situation in respect to each of these problems. MODERNIZING THE CURRICULUM At bottom, the problems above mentioned revolve about modernization of the school program. A Kvely discussion is in progress among both teachers and lay- men on this subject. Such terms as "a modern school," "a modern curriculum" are in common use. It is im- portant to point out, however, that these conceptions have not yet been reduced to definite and generally ac- cepted form. The goal which progressive educators have in mind may perhaps be indicated by Professor nanus's characterization of the modern school: "The education demanded by a democratic society to-day is an education that prepares a youth to overcome the inevitable difficulties that stand in the way of his material and spiritual advancement; an education that, from the beginning, promotes his normal physical devel- opment through the most salutary environment and appropriate physical training; that opens his mind and lets the world in through every natural power of observa- tion and assimilation; that cultivates hand-power as well as head-power; that inculcates the appreciation of beauty in nature and in art, and insists on the performance of duty to self and to others; an education that in youth and early manhood, while continuing the work already done, enables the youth to discover his own powers and limita- tions, and that impels him through oft-repeated intel- cq a PRESENT DAY PROBLEMS 5 lectual conquests or other forms of productive effort to look forward to a life of habitual achievement with his head or his hands, or both; that enables him to analyze for himself the intellectual, economic, and political prob- lems of his time, and that gives the insight, the interest, and the power to deal with them as successfully as possi- ble for his own advancement and for social service: and, finally, that causes him to reaUze that the only way to win and to retain the prizes of life, namely, wealth, cul- ture, leisure, honor, is an ever-increasing usefulness, and thus makes him feel that a life without growth and with- out service is not worth living."^ The execution of any such scheme calls for adequate facihties and organization — a new and different t}^e of plant, a revised program, a differentiated corps of teach- ers, a changed spirit in instruction. In all these respects progress has been made. Communities able to afford the necessary expenditure have begun to construct mod- ern school buildings and to reconstruct buildings already in use, so as to provide more or less satisfactory facilities in the way of gymnasiums, swimming pools, shops, and laboratories. But progress has been very uneven. No city has as yet executed a consistent policy. Many large cities still offer little beyond the traditional book studies. Not infrequently a period or two a week for girls in cooking and sewing, and an equal amount of time for boys in manual training in the two or three ^Hanus: A Modern School (pp. 3-4). 6 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS upper grades of the elementary school, represent the total departure from the meager traditional scheme. The modern viewpoint calls, however, for adaptation as well as enrichment. The more liberal curriculum needs to be adjusted to the varying needs of children who differ in capacity. Some progress — also uneven, to be sure — can be reported in this matter. Most of our larger cities now have separate classes and special pro- grams for the mentally backward, for the blind, the deaf, and for children suffering with tuberculosis. Many cities provide differentiated courses in the upper grades, and in large schools, when there are a number of classes of the same grade, children are placed in the group in which they can do their best work. Nevertheless, statistics of elimination and retardation make clear that the schools have not yet adequately met the problem of providing programs adapted to wide differences in physical en- dowment, mental capacity, and vocational destination. Again, the modern school, in the sense in which Pro- fessor Hanus uses the term, does something more than teach and train. It aims to concentrate and localize the forces and agencies which make for child welfare. It furnishes medical inspection, and, when necessary, medical treatment; dental clinics, with free service for children whose parents cannot afford to pay; and play and recreation under school supervision. These are integral parts of a program which seeks to provide op- portunity not simply to master the tools of learning, but also to place children in contact with the world and the PRESENT DAY PROBLEMS 7 society in which they live and to make of them vigorous and capable boys and girls on the physical, social, and moral side as well as the intellectual. INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF TEACHERS Much has also been accomplished in developing better teachers. More has been required of those entering the profession, and a more efficient type of supervision has been generally introduced. Moreover, administrators are realizing that expert teaching cannot be expected from a single teacher in from eight to fifteen subjects. In many cities the seventh and eighth grades, and in some the sixth and even the fifth, have been organized so as to give to each instructor one or two subjects, instead of asking him to cover the whole field. But administrative officers hesitate to carry the departmental idea into the lower grades. Nevertheless, the problem must be faced if the elementary program is to be com- pletely modernized, and experiments in this direction are worthy of careful study. FINANCING THE SCHOOLS The adequate financing of public education on this broader basis is a difficult undertaking. Cities are in debt for school buildings and for other public improve- ments to the limit permitted by law, and in some cases almost to the point of bankruptcy. The demand for a modern curriculimi, involving large additions to build- ings and grounds, is frequently rtiet with the objection 8 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS that the city cannot afford to make the required invest- ment — a forcible argument in a community, aheady bonded to the limit, which finds itself in urgent need of better streets, better fire protection, more adequate police, larger and more far reaching provision for public health. Any proposal, therefore, which prom- ises to make a dollar buy more deserves serious con- sideration. The Gary schools are of more than local interest be- cause they have tried to deal with these problems. They have made certain experiments looking to the en- richment and differentiation of the curriculum; certain innovations in the organization of the teaching staff; and they are trying to finance their enlarged facilities with funds raised by taxation. What they have done in the way of organization, administration, and finance cannot, however, be understood except in the light of the program of studies offered. The central problem is the problem of the curriculum, for on the educational opportunities thus offered depend the facilities that must oe provided, the type of organization needed to procure their effective and economical use, the quality and num- bers of the teaching staff, and, finally, the amount of money that must needs be raised. To the Gary pro- gram of studies and to the way in which this program is organized and administered, our attention must, there- fore, first be directed. II. PROGRAM OUR discussion of the Gary program of studies is confined to the elementary school, because the high school course is of conventional character.^ The discussion is based on illustrations from the pro- grams of particular schools. The nine schools composing the system vary in size from the West Gary school, with two teachers and 46 pupils, to the Froebel school, with 58 teachers and an enrollment of 2,087 children. The number of teachers, the enrollment, and the average daily attendance at each school for 1915-1916 were as follows : SCHOOLS NUMBER OF TEACHERS TOTAL ENROLL- MENT, I915-1916 AVERAGE DAILY ATTENDANCE Froebel Emerson Jefferson Beveridge Glen Park. . . . 24th Avenue . . . Ambridge Clarke West Gary 58 33 20 14 8 7 3 2 2 2,087 967 1,011 683 315 347 146 52 46 1,503 742 728 520 224 254 92 39 30 Total 147 5,654 4,132 ^For discussion of the high school program, see The Gary Public Schools : A General Account, Ch. V. lo THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS TYPES OF WORK PROVIDED The elementary program of these schools provides for each class, as a rule, four distinct types of instruction : 1. Academic work — the traditional school subjects — including reading, spelling, grammar, writing, arithmetic, geography, and history. 2. Special work, including handwork, drawing, sci- ence, cooking, sewing, manual training, forge, foundry, print shop, etc. 3. Auditorium, including singing, music on the phon- ograph, or children's performances on musical instru- ments, moving pictures, dramatics, individual or class exercises, etc. 4. Physical education and play, including gymnastic exercises, and play in the playroom, on playgrounds or athletic fields. Consider, for example, the schedule of a primary grade at the Emerson school in the spring term, 1915-1916: 8:15- 9:15 Language and numbers (academic) 9:15-10:15 Handwork and nature study (special) 10:15-11 :i 5 Play and physical training 11:15-12:15 Luncheon 12:15- 1-15 Handwork and nature study (special) 1:15- 2:15 Language and numbers (academic) 2:15- 3:15 Auditorium 3:15- 4:15 Play and physical training This class, it will be observed, has daily two hours of academic work, 8:15 and i :i5; two hours of special work, PROGRAM n 9:15 and 12:15; one hour of auditorium, 2:15; and two hours of play and physical training, 10:15 and 3:15, mak- ing in all a seven hour instruction day for the children, with an additional hour for luncheon. The schedule of a sixth grade Emerson class illustrates the same point : 8:15- 9:15 Auditorium 9:15-10:15 Play and physical training 10:15-11:15 Mechanical drawing (boys) Teachers' assistants (girls) (special) 11:15-12:15 Mechanical drawing (girls) Teachers' assistants (boys) (special) 12:15- I -15 Luncheon 1:15- 2:15 History and reading (academic) 2:15- 3:15 Arithmetic and geography (academic) 3:15- 4:15 Language (academic) This class has three hours of academic work, two hours of special, and one hour each of auditorium and physical training and play. The work of all classes in the Emerson school is simi- larly divided, as can be seen from Table I.* What is true of the types of work at Emerson school is true of the Froebel, Jefferson, and Beveridge schools, and almost equally true of the very smallest Gary schools,^ as the following schedule of a primary class at the 24th Avenue school shows : 1 See page 13. *For complete program of Emerson, see Table A of the Appendix; of Froebel, Table B; of Beveridge, Table C. 12 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL HOURS SUBJECT 1 rEACl 8:45- 9:10 Music B 9:10- 9:30 Literature B 9:30-10:15 Play C 10:15-10:45 Numbers A 10:45-11:00 Phonics A 1 1 :oo-i 1 :30 Reading A 11:30-11:45 Language A 1 1 :45- I :oo Luncheon 1:00- 1:45 Play C 1:45- 2:05 Nature Study B 2:05- 2:30 Drawing B 2:30- 2:45 Writing C 2:45- 3:00 Phonics C 3:00- 3:30 Reading C 3:30- 3:45 Spelling C 3:45- 4:00 Language C The plant of the 24th Avenue school consists of five portables and an old one room rural building. There are two kindergarten and five first and second grade classes. Yet these primary classes go to three different teachers and have three separate types of work: (a) the usual primary academic instruction; (b) special work, including Uterature, music, drawing, and nature study; and (c) play. VARIETY OF SPECIAL WORK AND CYCLES IN COURSES The Gary program is further distinguished by the variety of special work provided. There are, for ex- ample, at Emerson and Froebel separate elementary courses in chemistry, physics, botany, and zoology. PROGRAM 13 TABLE II Types of Work of All Elementary Classes — Emerson School Spring Term, 1915-1916 Classes Scheduled For: school HOURS ACADEMIC WORK SPECIAL WORK^ AUDITO- RIUM gymnasium PLAY- GROUND PLAY-ROOM luncheon 8:15 5, 9 8, 11, 13, 7,15 10, 12, 14 4, 6 9:15 11,7,10 6,8,9,13, 15 5,9,13,15 7,11,12,4, 10,14 4,6,8 12,14 10:15 5 11:15 4,11 12,6,14,10 7,8 5,9,13,15 12:15 9,15,13 5 4, 6, 7, 8. 10,11,12 14 1:15 5, 7, 11, 15, 12, 10,14 6,12,8, 14, 10, 13 8, 9 4,6,13 2:15 4 5,7 9,11,15 3.15 4,12,14 6 9,11,13,15 5,8,7,10 'The numbers in Table I under Acadenuc Work, Special Work, etc., and to the right of School Hours are the official numbers of the respective classes. To read the program of a given class, follow the class number from period to period and note the kind of work for which the clas.-i is scheduled. The different elementary classes of Emerson for the spring term, 1915-1916, bore the following numbers; 4 Second grade, A and B sections 5 First grade, B and C sections 6 First grade, A, and second grade, C sec- tions 7 Third grade, B and C sections 8 Third grade. A, and fourth grade, C sec tions 9 Fourth grade 10 Seventh grade, C section 11 Fifth grade 12 Sixth grade 13 Seventh grade 14 Eighth grade 15 Eighth grade ^Includes mechanical and freehand drawing, science, cooking, sewing, shop, helpers, teachers' assistants. 14 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Emerson offers forge, foundry, machine shop, and printing. Froebel gives cabinet work, tinsmithing, plumbing, paint- ing, printing, and shoe cobbling. In order that children may have opportunity to participate during their school careers in a number of such activities, special work in all Gary schools is broken up into short courses from ten weeks to a half year in length, and offered in cycles. For example, class 7 of Froebel, first grade, had nature study the first two terms of 1915-1916, and handwork and drawing the last two terms. Class 41, sixth grade, took, for the first ten weeks of 1915-1916, either physics or botany; the second ten weeks the entire class served as teachers' assistants; the third ten weeks the boys took shop work and the girls sewing; and the fourth ten weeks the boys went tp mechanical drawing and the girls to freehand drawing. While there are thus frequent changes in special work, and consequent changes in class programs, all children of the lower grades — at least, in the larger schools — are supposed to have an equal and given amount of nature study, handwork, and freehand drawing, music, expression and application;^ and all children of the upper grades, an equal and given amount of drawing, science, and shop work, although the kind of drawing and science studied, and the particular shop experiences, may and do differ with the pupil, the class, and the school. 'Expression is instruction in story telling, dramatization, and literature. Application includes special drill and the application of principles to practical every-day problems. For full discussion, see The Gary Public Schools: A General Account, Chapter V. PROGRAM IS Occasionally classes fail to get in given grades the specified amount of special instruction, and now and then classes get double the normal allotment. Yet these class cycles in special work are operated, on the whole, with commendable regularity, so that the number of special activities in which each class participates and the amount of time each class gives to each special activity are sur- prisingly uniform. For example, at Jefferson all classes through the 3C grade had at some time during 191 5-19 16 music, expression, handwork or drawing, nature study, and application; and, with two exceptions, each class devoted the same amount of time respectively to these exercises. (Table 11^.) Similarly, all sixth and upper grade classes had nature study, drawing, cooking, sew- ing, and shop (girls taking cooking and sewing, and boys, shop), and the several classes were in these respective branches approximately the same length of time.^ At the same time attention must be called to the fact that though classes are for the most part regularly scheduled for special work, individual pupils are not infrequently quite irregular in the amount of special work they receive. This apparent inconsistency arises from the habit of allow- ing individuals to leave the class to which they properly belong for all sorts of reasons — some doubtless good, some undoubtedly questionable.' *See page 16. 'For regularity of changes at Froebel, see Appendix, Table D. 'This point is more fully explained on pages 103-107. i6 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 7^ Nouvonddv O Aonxs aranxvN (sXog) dOHS oooooooooooiJioo ooooooooooooooooooooo OOOOOOOlOU3lOU5U3lOUSiOlOU3lOU3lom goooooooooooooo oooooooooooooo oraaooD OKLttvaa HO XHOMaNVH OOOOOQOOOOOOOO oooooo Noisssradxa I lo U3 u3 ca lo id M ilOU3lOlOlO>5»OU3C<>ii5u3C-< ^ '-I U CO U U5 lO -* t! or! 1-1 H (jq y-i i-H U CO z pq ri J3X1 «. ^ J3 See Table G of the Appendix. USE OF PLANT 71 This appears at first thought to be an Ingenious ar- rangement to give pupils a seven hour instruction day, increasing the daily use of ordinary classrooms, without adding to the size of the plant. Analysis of the arrange- ment dissipates this impression. In the first place, the pupil instruction day in a school operating under the new type of organization cannot be increased from six to seven hours without additional plant facihties. To illustrate: An instruction day of six hours would probably be divided three hours to aca- demic work and three to special activities. The three hours allotted to special activities would probably be apportioned as follows: (a) Kindergarten and first grades, two hours to play and one hour to other special activities; (b) Second to the sixth grades, one hour to physical training, one hour to auditorium, and one hour to other special activities; and (c) Seventh and eighth grades, a half hour to physical training, a half hour to auditorium, and two hours to other special activities. Under these program conditions, the building require- ments of a 60 class school are : (a) 30 standard classrooms, that is, enough to accommodate half of the school at one time in academic work; and (b) capacity in special facihties equivalent to the capacity of 30 standard class- rooms, that is, a capacity in special facihties sufficient to accommodate the other half of the school at one time; or a total capacity equivalent to the capacity of 72 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 60 standard classrooms. The special facilities would be apportioned about as follows: (a) Gymnasium capacity equivalent to ii| standard classrooms; (b) Auditorium capacity equivalent to 6f standard classrooms; and (c) Capacity in special facilities other than gymnasium and auditorium, such as nature study rooms, handwork rooms, cooking and manual training rooms, equivalent to I if standard classrooms. We are aware, of course, that school facilities caimot be provided in broken units ; we however retain the frac- tions in order to keep the relations mathematically exact for purposes of comparison.^ 'The mathematics of these building requirements is simple. To ac- commodate 60 classes three hours daily in academic studies is equal to caring for 180 classes one hour. One standard classroom accommo- dates 6 classes for one hour daily, therefore to care for 180 classes will require 30 standard classrooms (i8o-f-6). To accommodate 16 kindergarten and first grade classes (the estimated number in a 60 class school — see page 67,) two hours daily in play, 34 second to sixth grade classes one hour daily in physical training, and 10 seventh and eighth grade classes a half hour daily is equal to 71 class instruction hours; hence, on a six hour building instruction day, would require gymnasium capacity equivalent to ii| standard classrooms (71-6). To accommodate 34 second to sixth grade classes (the estimated num- ber in a 60 class school — see page 67) one hour daily in auditorium, and 10 seventh and eighth grade classes a half hour daily, is equal to 39 class instruction hours; hence, would require auditorium capacity equivalent to 6^ standard classrooms (39-^6). To accommodate in special activities other than gymnasium and audi- USE OF PLANT 73 It is important to note that "equivalent capacity in special facilities" does not mean the same number of special as of regular rooms. The number of special rooms will probably be less, for, as we have seen, several classes can be assembled at one time in a single audito- rium or in a single gymnasium. Nor does it mean an equal amount of floor space. The space requirements of the several studies and activities differ. In some instances it takes more and in others less room to ac- commodate a standard sized class in a special activity than in an academic study. For example, cooking, manual training, and science, the instruction groups being ordinarily half of a full sized class, call for approximately double the space required by academic work, whereas auditorium requires only about a third as much. In a word, we are dealing with equivalent capacity when a standard sized class is the unit of comparison. There- fore, the above requirements mean that apart from the number of special rooms and amount of floor space thus needed, the special faciHties together must be suf- ficient to accommodate at one time 30 standard sized classes. On the other hand, when the pupil instruction day is seven hours for all grades, three hours would be allotted torium 16 kindergarten and first grade classes one hour daily, 34 second to sixth grade classes one hour daily, and 10 seventh and eighth grade classes two hours daily, is equal to 70 class instruction hours; hence, would require special facilities other than gymnasium and auditorium equivalent to the capacity of ii| standard classrooms (70H-6). 74 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS to academic work and four hours to special activities. The time for special activities would be apportioned about as follows: (a) Kindergarten and first grade, two hours to play and two hours to other special activities ; (b) Second to fourth grades, two hours to physical training, one hour to auditorium, and one hour to other special activities ; and (c) Fifth to eighth grades, one hour to physical train- ing, one hour to auditorium, and two hours to other spe- cial activities. Under these conditions, when the regular classrooms are used eight hours and special facilities six hours daily, the building requirements of a 60 class school are : (a) 22^ regular rooms (60 X 3-^8) ; and (b) Special facilities equivalent to the capacity of 40 standard classrooms, or a total capacity equivalent to the capacity of 62^ (40+22!) standard classrooms.^ The special facilities would be apportioned approximately as follows : (a) Gymnasium capacity equivalent to i6i standard classrooms ; (b) Auditorium capacity equivalent to 7I standard classrooms ; and *It is recognized that the instruction day for kindergarten and the first grade is usually shorter than for the other grades. Even Gary does not contemplate a seven hour instruction day for the kindergarten and first primary, and we hold to a seven hour instruction day for them in order to keep the comparison exact. USE OF PLANT 75 (c) Capacity in special facilities, other than gymna- sium and auditorium, equivalent to i6f standard class- rooms. The change from a six to a seven hour pupil instruc- tion day in a school under the departmental type of or- ganization, even though regular rooms are employed eight hours a day, requires, it will be noted, a net increase in plant facilities equivalent to the capacity of 2§ class- rooms, or an increase of 4 per cent. But this may not be the most important difference. The number of regular rooms is reduced from 30 to 2 2^ and the special facilities are increased from the equivalent of 30 to the equivalent of 40 standard classrooms. This alters radically the character of the facilities to be provided and the interior structure of the plant, and raises the question of the rela- tive cost of an equal capacity in regular and special rooms. Let this be as it may, it suffices for the present to note that, even in a plant operating under the new type of organization, lengthening the pupil instruction day from six to seven hours cannot be accomplished by a mere administrative arrangement which permits the use of regular rooms eight hours a day; to do it requires additional building facilities. In the second place, the double luncheon period, the center of this administrative arrangement, is open to question. It brings the school into direct conflict with domestic arrangements and habits, as it interrupts and makes irregular the midday meal in families with children, who, belonging to different classes, go home to 76 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS luncheon at different hours. It is undesirable so to or- ganize the school that it interferes unduly, as does the double luncheon period, with the convenience of the family ; in our opinion such an arrangement can hardly be acceptable to the home, whatever school economies may be achieved thereby. Let us consider what these econo- mies amount to. Any use of regular rooms in excess of seven hours when the pupil instruction day is seven hours would seem to be a clear economic gain. But the use of regular rooms eight hours, when special facilities can only be employed six,^ increases the proportion of special to regular rooms. For example, under the above program conditions, special facilities used six hours must be provided in sufficient quantity to care during four hours daily for all the classes that regular rooms used eight hours can accom- modate three hours a day. Obviously, the greater the proportion of special facilities to regular rooms, the greater the proportion of the entire school plant idle after six hours of service. For this reason, when the pupil instruction day is seven hours, the net gain from an eight hour use of regular rooms and the double luncheon period comes to nothing. 'See pages 68-70. Moreover, it should be kept in mind that in order to use regular rooms eight hours a day it is necessary to schedule all special work the first three hours cf the morning and the last three hours of the afternoon, thus leaving all special facilities idle the two midday periods. Otherwise, with half of the school at luncheon each cf these periods, there would not be pupils available to fill the regular rooms. See Table G of the Appendix. o USE OF PLANT 77 To illustrate: Under the above program conditions (page 73), when the pupil instruction day and the day for regular rooms are seven hours, the building require- ments^ of a 60 class school are : (a) 25t regular rooms; and (b) Special facihties equal to the capacity of 361^^ ordinary rooms, or a total capacity equivalent to 62tt standard classrooms. The special facihties would be apportioned about as follows : (a) Gymnasium capacity equivalent to 13I standard classrooms; (b) Auditorium capacity equivalent to 6f standard classrooms; and (c) Capacity in special facihties, other than gymna- sium and auditorium, equivalent to i6| standard class- rooms.^ Therefore, when, in a school operating under the new ^For method of computation, see note page 72. It should, however, be observed that when the plant instruction day is seven hours, gymna- sium and auditorium may be used seven hours daily. ^To accommodate 16 kindergarten and first grade classes in other than gymnasium and auditorium two hours daily; 21 second to fourth grade classes one hour; and 23 fifth to eighth grade classes two hours, is equal to 99 class instruction hours. Hence, there will be required a capacity in special facilities other than gymnasium and auditorium equivalent to the capacity of 14^ standard classrooms (99-^7). But such facihties cannot ordinarily be used in excess of six hours. Therefore, that there may be available each hour of the seven hour school day a capacity in special facilities other than auditorium and gymnasium equal to 141^ standard classrooms, there must be provided a capacity equivalent to 16^ standard classrooms, thus allowing for ^ of such facilities being idle all the time. 78 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS type of organization and having a seven hour pupil in- struction day, regular rooms are used seven instead of eight hours a day, the requirements of a 60 class school under given program conditions are reduced from a total capacity^ equivalent to 62^ to a capacity equivalent to 62i\ standard classrooms.- The reduction is probably even greater, for the double luncheon period and the eight hour use of ordinary rooms permit no use of special facilities for other purposes, as they are fully occupied six hours of the day and are ordinarily not needed during the two noon hours. In contrast, when regular rooms are in use seven hours, it is possible to make occasional use throughout the school day of some of the vacant special facilities for regular instruction, and this might easily add further to the economic advantage of the single luncheon period and seven hour day. Where different kinds of facilities are not available in proper proportion each to the other, the double luncheon period and eight hour use of regular rooms may be tolerated as a temporary makeshift, but it cannot be defended on the basis of either economy or more intensive use of plant; it is, more- over, not an essential feature of the departmental organ- ization. But even the departmental organization of a school, on the basis of a seven hour pupil instruction day and a seven hour daily use of regular rooms, does not provide ^See page 74. ^These mathematical relations hold approximately for schools of all sizes large enough to accommodate an extended program. USE OF PLANT 79 for continuous employment of all facilities. One seventh of all special facilities, other than auditorium and gym- nasium, which constitute more than a fourth of the entire plant, will be idle practically all the time.^ There are, be- sides, certain other facihties, particularly outside equip- ment, that will be unused from a half to two thirds of the entire school year. For example, when from time to time children are at work in the school gardens, nature study rooms and botany laboratories are likely to be empty; when children are on the playgrounds, gymnasiums and swimming pools are Hkely to be unoccupied, and vice versa. When special auditorium exercises take place outside the regular auditorium period, regular rooms are vacant, and so on. Obviously, the new type of organization, when the school day is in excess of six hours, is not capable of keeping all school facihties in full use every hour of the school day. Undoubtedly, it possesses advantages over the old type of organization in semimodern plants, for in such plants, under the old organization, there is in- evitable waste in connection with regular classrooms, and all special facilities, such as auditorium, gymnasium, cooking and manual training rooms. But whatever the length of the school day, there is a certain amount of waste even under the new type of organization, from failure to use the plant uninterruptedly, because the different kinds of facihties are not provided in proper proportion to one another, or because of peculiarities in iSee note, page 77. 8o THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS the proposed program, or unusual makeup and grade distribution of the classes. The economic loss will cer- tainly be greater in a school so organized than in a con- ventional school, and might even prove not less than in a semimodem school operating under the classroom type of organization, unless a high type of administrative talent is employed. Even then it is doubtful whether a plant so operated can be utilized ordinarily at more than 95 per cent, of its maximum capacity, if the experience of a well administered high school similarly organized is any criterion. The situation may therefore be sum- marized as follows: A school plant with modern features cannot possibly be utilized up to loo per cent, of its actual physical capacity. Under the new type of organization it can, however, be used more steadily and effectually than under the conventional organization, but these possibilities cannot be realized without unusual adminis- trative skill. UTILIZING OUTSIDE FACILITIES It is interesting to note in this connection that the new type of organization permits the use of outside facilities. In some of the schools of Gary pupils leave the building , at fixed intervals for religious or hbrary instruction and even for physical training. For example, at Jefferson they go to the pubHc library, and to the Y. M. C. A. for physical training and competitive games. If it is regarded as desirable to place school children in other institutions for a part of the school day and thus to USE OF PLANT 8i take advantage of the resources of other child welfare agencies, it becomes possible to increase the number of children the schools can care for. At Gary, however, these outside activities are almost always scheduled for the period or periods when the children would otherwise be in the gymnasium or at play; consequently, with the possible exception of Jefferson, this outside work has not affected the number of pupils the several buildings have been able to accommodate. GRADE GROUPINGS AND SIZE OF PLANT The foregoing considerations raise to new prominence the questions: What are the proper divisions or grade groupings in a system of free public schools and what is the most desirable size of an elementary school plant? These questions are of great practical importance, be- cause elementary schools can not ordinarily have enough seventh and eighth grade pupils to keep in constant use the special facilities required by an extended and di- versified program. To illustrate : A seventh grade program may offer a half year in botany and a half year in zoology, and an eighth grade program similar periods in physics and chemistry. If highly specialized facilities are furnished, as at Froebel and Emerson, and the instruction groups are half of a stand- ard sized class, six seventh and six eighth grade classes are needed to keep them going continuously. If, on the other hand, there are combination laboratories, one for botany and zoology, and one for physics and chemistry, 82 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS three full sized classes will be needed in each of these grades. Similarly, a program may provide at least a year's work in cooking for girls. This may be distrib- uted, half to the seventh and half to the eighth grade, or all to the eighth grade. In either case, to keep a single cooking room and teacher engaged six hours a day, when the instruction groups are half of a standard sized class, requires the girls from six full sized classes. The problem appears in its acute form when opportunity is offered such pupils to participate in a variety of specialized industrial activities. For example, the Emerson school in 19 1 5-1 6 provided forge and foundry as well as cabinet and woodturning shops. These arts appeal primarily to boys who make up less than half of all upper grade classes. Therefore, as each shop can accommodate six half classes a day, to keep these four shops employed, provided all boys take industrial work a period a day throughout the seventh and eighth years, would require not less than 12 seventh and 12 eighth grade classes. There are, however, only 7 seventh grade and 5 eighth grade classes in all the schools of Gary, which points to the economic impossibiUty of offering too much variety in speciahzed industrial opportunities in an ordinary ele- mentary school. Gary has attempted to solve the problem by combining elementary and high schools, and by using the same specialized facilities for the instruction of upper grade, even lower grade, and high school pupils. There is obviously a sharp limit to the number of high schools USE OF PLANT 83 that can be established in conjunction with elementary schools, for no city can possibly need as many high schools as elementary schools. Moreover, the specialized facihties required by an up-to-date high school are dif- ferent from those required by seventh and eighth grade instruction and are as far above the needs of the seventh and eighth grades as the facilities they require are dif- ferent from and above the needs of the intermediate and primary grades. The most general special facihties, such as handwork and drawing rooms, and nature study rooms, suffice for grades one to six, and it is only the high school that requires highly specialized equipment such as separate art studios and separate science lab- oratories. Therefore, to be compelled to use with in- termediate and primary pupils facilities appropriate to the seventh and eighth grades, or to use high school equipment with seventh and eighth year pupils, inevit- ably involves a certain amount of waste. The first step toward the solution of the problem will compel, we beheve, a new grade grouping within the pubhc schools. The junior high school movement has already pretty clearly indicated the nature of the realign- ment needed, and it should occasion no surprise that the requirements of the junior high school, itself an attempt to modernize the seventh and eighth grades, should coin- cide with the requirements of an expanding program for all grades. The arrangement most favorable to the development of modern programs and to the full use of all facilities each hour of the school day is, we believe, 84 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS approximately as follows: elementary school, grades one to six; junior high school, grades seven to nine; and senior high school, grades ten to twelve; that is, the six- three-three plan of organization. In large cities, there would be separate buildings for the junior and for the senior high schools. In cities the size of Gary, the junior and the senior high schools might well occupy the same building, while in small cities, a single building would suffice for all three schools. The second step involves the erection of plants designed to operate specific programs and to accommodate a given number of classes. A conventional program can be given about as well in a twelve room plant as in a twenty- four or a forty-eight room building. Economically, there is Httle to choose. In fact, aside from the distance children must go, there are only two questions of im- portance to consider: How large can a plant be without depriving the principal of that intimate knowledge and contact essential to the achievement of satisfactory re- sults, and how small can a plant be without interfering with proper pupil grading? On these questions opinions and practices differ widely. An extended and diversified program alters entirely the situation. To operate it at all the rooms must be of different kinds and to do this economically these must be in proper proportion to one another. Here is then a real criterion. The working size of a building can not be increased merely by adding a number of regular rooms. Due respect for economy forbids that gymnasium or USE OF PLANT 85 auditorium or shops have a daily capacity of forty classes, while other faciHties provide for only half as many. To be sure, the number of children to be housed, their convenience and best interests determine the number of plants to be erected; but the number of classes to be accommodated in any given building, or its size, as well as the character of and relations between its facilities, must be determined by the requirements of the program to be followed. Hence, the starting point as well as the final basis of decision in the erection of a new plant is the program to be offered. This involves deciding by grades on the regular studies and special activities to be included; on the length of the school day, on the division of the school day among the different kinds of work, on the allotment of time to each of the special activities, and on the extent to which the proposed special activities require general or highly specialized facilities, on the length to which departmentalization is to be carried, and on the size of the instructional groups. When plants are thus built around a given program and plan of organization, it will be necessary, we beheve, in order to provide at a minimum cost a broad, varied, and rich course of study, to make schools larger than is common at present ; but they will not necessarily need to be so large as the Emerson and Froebel schools. While the larger plant provides the more favorable conditions, the new type of organization may be employed in schools of almost any size, as the experience of Gary shows. For example, at the Clarke school, which has 86 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS only two rooms, each teacher is responsible for a room and yet the teachers as well as the children circulate freely. They come together for general or auditorium exercises now in one room and now in the other. One teacher takes most of the arithmetic, history, and physiology; the other, most of the reading and geography, and so on, according to the special interest, preparation, and skill of the two teachers. The 24th Avenue school has seven teachers, with classes ranging from the kindergarten to the second grade. Here one teacher has the play and physical training, and another, the literature, music, nature study, and gardening. The Glen Park school, with eight teachers and all grades, shows a further divi- sion of work. One teacher does the play and physical training, another has charge of the auditorium, music, and expression, and there is also a separate teacher for manual training, handwork, and mechanical drawing, and for cooking, nature study, and gardening. At Beveridge, a school with fourteen teachers, departmentalization is still more complete. Manual training, cooking, hand- work and drawing, nature study, music and auditorium, and play and physical training each have special teach- ers.^ LENGTH OF THE SCHOOL DAY Finally, it is desirable to call attention to the fact that the new type of organization is not bound up with a seven hour instruction day. With the new type of organiza- ^See Table C of the Appendix. USE OF PLANT 87 tion, as with the old, the school day may be of any desired length. To be sure, an extended and diversified pro- gram requires more time than a narrow, conventional pro- gram ; but not necessarily seven hours. For example, by the simple expedient of eliminating the auditorium the Gary program could be reduced to six hours. For cer- tain congested and foreign sections of Gary there are convincing reasons why the instruction day should be seven hours. But under other living and social conditions there may be objections to a school day in excess of six hours. SUMMARY To summarize: The number of pupils a plant will ac- commodate under the new or departmental type of or- ganization is determined by the requirements of the pro- gram followed and will vary with these requirements. With a rich and varied program, the pupil capacit}^ of a modern plant will be greater under the new type of organization than under the classroom type of organiza- tion, as it permits the maximum use of both regular and special teachers and of all facilities. Special facilities cannot ordinarily be kept in use more than six hours a day whatever the type of organization, but the loss in a modern plant under the new type of organization, when the program is rich and varied, will never be as great as it would be under the old type of organization. Conditions are most favorable under the new type of organization when the instruction day is six hours, when 88 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS the grade groupings are on the six-three-three plan, and when plants are erected in view of the requirements of particular programs and for the accommodation of a given number of classes. While a large plant offers the most favorable field of operation, the new type of organization may be employed within limits in a school of any size having more than one teacher. VI. SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION THE results achieved at Gary in respect both to education and cost depend no less than in other systems upon the effectiveness of the ad- ministration and supervision. SUPERVISION The administrative and supervisory staff of the Gary schools consists of a superintendent, an assistant super- intendent (who is also director of night schools and super- visor of the upper grades of elementary day schools), an assistant superintendent in charge of kindergarten and primary grades, a supervisor of handwriting, of physical education, and of the industrial arts, certain heads of high school departments theoretically respon- sible for the supervision of their subjects throughout the system, and school principals.^ With the exception of heads of departments and school principals, these ofl&cers are charged with the responsibilities commonly associated with their respective titles and positions. *A teacher at Froebel who gave a considerable amount of his time to advising and assigning pupils to industrial work is not included in this enumeration. 89 Qo THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPERVISION The superintendent of schools and his two chief as- sistants may be characterized as general supervisors, since their control is exercised not over a particular subject or a particular school, but over the entire system. It is not easy to describe their activities, nor is it easy to evaluate their work. The theory of supervision, which accords with the practice observed, can be best expressed by saying that the general supervisory staff develops a plan of organization, making suggestions and outlining ideals to be attained, and then leaves the other members of the school staff to realize these aims in their own way. The superintendent participates in the actual organiza- tion of certain phases of the work, such, for example, as transition classes between the kindergarten and first grade, and all school programs are submitted to him for re- view and approval. Three or four times a year he holds general teachers' meetings on Saturday afternoons for the discussion of policies and methods of procedure, but rou- tine matters occupy a conspicuous place at such gatherings. Occasionally, he announces special meetings, but these are, as a rule, given over to topics of particular interest to the teachers themselves, such as the length of the instruction day and salary schedules. Informal confer- ences are held at long intervals with supervisors, princi- pals, and heads of departments, and now and then a teacher calls at the office, but seldom for any other pur- pose than to adjust some personal matter. From time to SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 91 time, questions of repairs, rearrangement of classrooms, additions to buildings, and improvements to grounds, take the superintendent into the schools for an hour or two at a time, and occasionally he observes classroom work. Similarly, the two assistant superintendents hold meet- ings with the particular teachers under their direction, the one supervising the upper and the other the kindergarten and primary grades. The schools are dismissed an hour earlier to permit teachers to attend. General problems of interest to the particular grades receive some attention, but the time is mostly consumed with details of instruction and routine in management. The assistant superintend- ents also visit classes, observe the instruction, advise with the teachers, and finally grade them, as is required by the Indiana law. They assemble reports on children's work, determine whether or not they shall be promoted, over- see the makeup of their daily schedules, and advise in the organization of classes. In fact, the assistant super- intendent of the kindergarten and primary grades gives a good part of her time to studying individual needs and to seeing that children are properly classified. Never- theless, on the whole, there is too little supervisory effort to organize the practices — many of them recent — for the achievement of the proposed aims of the Gary schools, too Httle close supervision to see whether the classroom work makes good the theories and aims adopted, and too Httle central endeavor to determine the quality of the pupils' performances. In a word, the general supervision is inadequate in amount and ineffective in its results. 92 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS There is no good reason why this should be so. Three general supervisors, with the assistance of three special supervisors,^ should be able to give unity of purpose and consistency of effort to a system having less than 150 teachers and less than 6,000 pupils. Nor is it because the outlay for supervision is meager. The combined salaries for 1915-1916 of the general supervisors, charge- able to the regular day schools, amounted to $8,925, and of the three special supervisors, to $3,650, a total of $12,575.2 In truth, the situation raises an interesting question: What are the possibiUties, what should be the practice, and what should be the character of supervi- sion in a school or school system experimenting with program and organization? It is impossible to answer these questions offhand. It is, however, apparent that the more complicated and novel the system, the greater the need of central direction, the greater the need of unity of policy, and the closer the scrutiny with which results should be observed. Schools like Emerson and Froebel are more complex both in program and in or- ganization than the conventional school, and hence there is every reason to beheve that they require rather more *To be exact, there are two and one third general supervisors, counting the superintendent, as one assistant superintendent gives only one third of his time to the day schools. On the other hand, the teacher at Froe- bel mentioned in the footnote on page 89 is not included among the special supervisors. It is to be noted also that the industrial super- visor has charge of repairs, but as this repair work is supposed to be educational, we consider his entire time as being given to supervision. ^See Tables III and IV of report on Costs. SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 93 than less the customary amount of administrative and supervisory direction and control, always provided, be it understood, that it is supervision of the right kind. Obviously, there is a real danger of the wrong kind of supervision in a school that is attempting tasks requiring new and resourceful adjustments, as would be the case if the supervisors should lack sympathy with the extension and enrichment of the curriculum and the type of organ- ization needed for these purposes. The success of a more or less novel educational enterprise depends on vision, initiative, and a certain freedom. But freedom is not license. Genuine experimentation is exacting. While, therefore, the supervision required in a school system which is itself to a degree experimental differs from that needed in schools working in conventional ways for con- ventional results, there is certainly the very greatest need in the former of supervisors of deep insight and Kb- eral sympathies, who will assist teachers to appreciate the ideals back of modem education as well as to grasp clearly the specific aims which they are to realize, who will direct them in developing instructional materials and teaching methods appropriate to the realization of their aims, and assist them in measuring and evaluating the products of their classroom work by the sound and inevitable standards of practical hfe. THE SCHOOL PRINCIPAL The Gary school principal has little to do with the educational side of his school. He organizes it in con- 94 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS sultation with the superintendent and assistant superin- tendents, looks after the building and grounds, meets parents, handles special attendance and discipline cases, orders books and supplies, collects reports from teachers, hires and supervises the janitorial force, and makes re- ports to the superintendent; he also arranges the pro- grams of teachers and supplies substitutes, holds weekly teachers' meetings after school hours to consider questions of discipline, attendance, and school management, and occasionally visits classes, but he has no responsibiHty for the quality of the teaching. Records of enrollment, of promotion, and of scholarship come to his office, but the responsibiHty for what pupils do and for their promotion belongs to the teachers and general super- visors. In short, the principal is an administrative officer. Our observations and our investigations of the quality of the instruction indicate the need of a more detailed and intimate type of educational control, such as the best school principals of other systems exercise. The principal at Gary should undoubtedly be the head of his school, even if the business management has to be delegated. For general supervisors who go from school to school are rarely intimate enough with the needs and abilities of particular children to advise wisely as to their programs or their promotion, nor do they, as a rule, know individual teachers well enough to be able to offer the helpful criticism and suggestions which make for the highest degree of efficiency in a teaching corps. SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 95 SUPERVISORS OF SPECIAL SUBJECTS Special supervisors have to do with given branches of instruction only; the handwriting supervisor, for exam- ple, with handwriting. This particular special supervisor at Gary corresponds, however, more nearly to what is known in other systems as a special teacher. He goes from building to building and from room to room actually teaching classes, particularly of the upper grades; he counsels teachers, gives suggestions, and at long intervals brings them together for conference. The supervisor of physical training^ — the latest addi- tion to the supervisory staff — works in much the same way. Through observing teachers at work, personal in- terviews, printed directions, occasional conferences with groups, and now and then a place on the program of a general meeting, he keeps in touch with the play and physical training instructors in the larger plants and even gives some direction to the work undertaken in the small schools by teachers who have had Httle or no special training. Under his oversight, considerable has already been accomphshed in organized play, in interscholastic athletics, and other recreational activities. The supervisor of the household and industrial arts 'The exact status of this supervisor is an open question. OfScially he is ranked as a teacher. We rank him as a special supervisor, because he has no class assignments on the school program, and because he gave all his time to supervision during the period of our study of physical training. 96 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS superintends also the repair work of the entire system and oversees some new construction. During the period of the field work of the survey, repairs, together with moving pictures, consumed most of his energies, and there is little reason to believe that he ever has much time for his strictly supervisory duties. To be sure, he is in and out of the several shops and even cooking and sewing rooms almost daily; he knows precisely what engages each shop and is thus able to give a certain unity and di- rection to the work. He also meets with the shopmen two or three times a year for an evening's discussion of their particular educational problems, but at most, there is little direct educational supervision of the practical work for boys and even less of that for girls. The heads of high school departments, particularly those at the Emerson school, feel a certain responsibil- ity for the teaching of their subjects in all grades and throughout the system. There is, however, no evidence that this mode of supervision is more than a theory. The head of the EngHsh department at Emerson and the physics teacher in the same school are, to be sure, keenly interested and have some influence in their respective fields, but teachers work, for the most part, independ- ently of such control. ADMINISTRATION Superintendents and school principals handling the new type of elementary organization have to deal with practically the same administrative problems as admin- SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 97 istrators of conventional systems, but a number of these problems have taken on new and more complex forms, which make the administration of such an elementary school comparable in difficulty with the administration of a modern high school. Among these problems are the storage of children's wraps and instructional supplies, the equipment of rooms occupied by children of different grades and ages, dis- cipline growing out of the frequent passage of classes from room to room, types of records and reports needed when children are not under the control of one teacher, and finally program making. STORAGE FACILITIES Storage space for the books and wraps of children is provided at Gary by means of lockers installed in the hall- ways and in some of the shops. Attractive cupboards hold the textbooks and materials used in academic in- struction, and such supplies as the special activities re- quire are kept in the special rooms. As far as possible, children are assigned lockers on the same floor and near the rooms where they will be the last period before lunch- eon and the last period in the afternoon. SCHOOL FURNITURE A somewhat more difficult task is that of providing furniture of suitable size, when c asses with children of different ages and grades use the same room. This problem has not been successfully solved at Gary. Very 98 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS often the feet of children seated at desks or on chairs do not reach the floor.^ Special rooms are equipped with furniture of one size only, and, although there a^e usually desks of two or three different sizes in regular rooms, sufficient care is not exercised to schedule classes so as to use to the best advantage equipment of the sizes pro- vided. The difficulty is by no means insurmountable, at least in fairly large schools. Rooms can be properly furnished and devoted to a single grade group; for ex- ample a single regular room can be used by second grade classes for academic work the whole day. A large school, providing the more general equipment for the household and industrial arts, as the Passaic school men- tioned above, will need more than one special room for this work. Hence, equipment can be varied so that the children of the first two grades wiU use one set, the third and fourth another set, and the fifth and sixth still an- other set. Similarly, special rooms for the seventh and eighth grades can easily be suppUed with chairs or stools of two or three different sizes. SCHOOL DISCIPLINE Under the new type of organization, practically the whole school appears in the corridors at the same time and goes from one part of the building to another not less than four times a day. For the sake of promptness and order all classes should move at the same moment. Other devices may be employed, but for satisfactory results a ^See illustration opposite page loo. SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 99 pneumatic clock and a full set of electric signals are es- sential. This corridor life gives rise to new problems in conduct and in discipline. In certain of the Gary- schools, the corridor discipline, though varying, is not everywhere or always satisfactory; but this is a local matter depending on the principal. No unprecedented or novel dijSiculty is presented, except perhaps the ex- tension to elementary pupils of a type of self control al- ready common with older pupils. An easy, natural, but self controlled mode of deportment is desirable. Gary indeed aims to secure just this and often does, but super- vision is in some places perhaps somewhat too lax. RECORDS AND REPORTS The departmentalized elementary school, even more than the conventional school, requires an adequate sys- tem of records and reports. Not the least difficult of these to devise and to keep is the record of attendance. At the time of the survey, the Gary procedure in record- ing attendance and absence was as follows: At the be- ginning of the term, each pupil takes his daily program card to the proper class teacher, who initials the card for the particular period for which the pupil is registered with him, and enters the pupil's name on his class roll. At each class meeting, the teacher calls the roll and a pupil selected for the purpose writes on an absence slip the names of all pupils not present, designating the room and period. These absence shps are collected at the last hour of the day and taken in charge next morning by the loo THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS "clearing house," a group of pupils who, under the direc- tion of a teacher, make up the attendance record of the school for the preceding day, copy on a separate slip the names of all pupils absent belonging to each register teacher, and deposit these with the proper teachers. Other pupils, serving as helpers, usually transfer these reports for the register teacher to the permanent attend- ance records of the particular group for which the given register teacher is responsible; children not reported ab- sent are marked present. Children may well profit by such responsibility and by engaging in such work, but the records kept in this way are strikingly incomplete, as evidenced by Table IX,^ which shows for each period of a given day for both Emerson and Froebel schools the number of pupils scheduled, the number of pupils actually present and ac- counted for, and the number not accounted for. Thus, at the Emerson school as many as 34 pupils are unac- counted for during one period, and at Froebel the number varies at given periods from a few to several hundred. The discrepancy between the number of children sched- uled for a particular period and the number present by actual count, when allowance is made for those reported absent and excused, can only be explained on the basis of failure to keep complete records, if not to control at- tendance. The discrepancy at Emerson is small and yet sufficiently large to indicate laxity. At Froebel, the conditions approach demoralization. ^See page loi. SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION loi 1 n 1 1 lO t- CD tH CO lo 05 «D C ec tH > •> C^ 1 U3 _ 1- < N lyj 1—1 lO ec o- ) CO tH tc a- > CO C^ OS Cv. en Q O la o- kT •* W tH o- «£ CO P-i .-H 1—1 o: « \a c OC CJ 1—1 oc u: N o «c o c t> CO T^^ oc t- do cc «: "O 0) I-. O a d) ^ i-> o T3 v in 3 (J « W^ M a O -a 4 in V 3 _>» O ": CJ ■c "cS u 3 < o CI 1- "-< c t-c r-l CO tH CO U5 lO (M_ c^ 1-1 1-1 t- O] U5 ^ OJ C^ lO eg o tr- t- rH ee t- ■ + oc ^ ) CO T— c > i-( u: a >_ eg »- 1- oc «: > (M r— a- 00 u: ■ u "O Oh 3 a >^ O ": a o -c c4 u OJ 3 < u o a h ^< c ii ^ ^^ J2 £ 3 3< 1 ;s 12; ^ I 102 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PROGRAM MAKING In a conventional school, program making is a simple matter. The program for each class of a given grade is practically fixed by the course of study; it remains for the class teacher to arrange the order of daily exercises so that there is a proper balance between the easy and the difficult. Under the departmental type of organization, program making is peculiarly the work of the principal and presents at once great opportunities and great diffi- culties. Upon the skill exercised in devising and dove- tailing the several class schedules depends the use made of the plant and its facilities. Further, there are great educational possibilities in adapting the work of the school to particular class and individual needs. Class and individual differences may within limits be taken into account ; the hours of some specially needed type of work may be increased, and opportunity may be given for double promotion or for specialization. The extent to which classes and individuals may be put where they can work to the best advantage depends, of course, on the breadth of the program, the building faciUties, and the number of classes in each grade and subject. To take full advantage of an extended and diversified program in a departmentalized school it is necessary for the principal to have in his office for guidance a carefully kept cumulative record card showing each pu- pil's attendance, scholarship, and previous work in every regular and special subject. Gary provides such a SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 103 form in the possession of the register teacher, but the record is poorly kept. It is also necessary for the prin- cipal in making up the pupil's program for a given year and grade to have in mind the child's entire school career. Gary does not realize the possibiHties of its program, as the study of a single Froebel class (No. 44, 7A) illus- trates. This class contained many weak pupils in un- questionable need of individual consideration and atten- tion. Its official spring program was as follows: 8:15 Gymnasium (play) or library 9:15 Music 10:15 Arithmetic 11:15 English 12:15 Luncheon 1:15 Auditorium 2:15 Shop (boys) ; Cooking or sewing (girls) 3:15 United States history^ In a conventional system each of the 31 pupils of the class would take the above studies at the designated period. At Gary the entire 3 1 pupils recited together in a single class — arithmetic — at the scheduled time. (Table X.^) Only two other subjects — gymnasium and English — claimed all members, but in neither of these branches were they all in the same class. Twenty-three took no music, seven no history, and four no auditorium. These variations might well represent real educational ^The class at this period was first scheduled for expression but the work was changed to United States history. 'See page 104. I04 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS m ^ TVXOI eocoTOoooseoecoo tH «5 t- ASOXSIH OMLvvas ao ONiaooD dOHS (M t-co I-H piaiaoiianv (M H3Nm CO 1— 1 HsnoNa CO CO CO oixaroaxiav i-H tH CO (M CO Disnw t- T-H 00 AavHan ao wmsvNWAO saoraad lo iO iO io ta la id la S oboioTMCsiTHcsieo H SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 105 gains. However, as we point out in the next paragraph, they are not adjustments to serve the interests of par- ticular pupils or to secure their regular advancement, but merely chance arrangements, the product of loose administration and supervision. The most surprising variations occur in the 9:15 and 2:15 periods. At 9 : 1 5 the class is scheduled for music. At that time thirteen went to the gymnasium, seven had music, one arithmetic, two shop, six cooking or sewing, and two drawing. At 2:15 boys are supposed to be in shop and girls in cooking or sewing. Actually, eight went to gymnasium or Hbrary, one to music, seven to shop, nine to cooking or sewing, five to drawing, and one to history. Again, the official program calls for only one period a day in each of the several studies; and yet fourteen pupils took two hours of gymnasium or Ubrary and two took three hours. Twelve pupils did double and one treble duty in practical work. (Table XI^) All told, there were thus not less than fifty-four deviations from the ofiicial class program, but only three were to afford addi- tional academic instruction — one in arithmetic and two in EngHsh. All persons concerned — teachers, principal, and chil- dren — were questioned about these changes. The prin- cipal, whose written endorsement is required, had no recollection of the reasons for them and no record of them. Although the pupil's Program Card reads, "No dropping of class nor change of program will be permitted ^See page 106. io6 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS without the written consent of the assistant superintend- ent," the children had not consulted this ofl&cial. A teacher employed to advise with children about their prac- tical work knew nothing about these departures. Reg- ister teachers/ supposed to have on file for each change "Permission to Change Class" slips, had barely a half dozen of them — not one completely executed — and were, therefore, almost wholly unaware of what had happened. The fact is, that in a few instances, the regular teachers, on their own authority, excused pupils from their classes, but in most instances children dropped what they did not want and elected what they wanted,' provided they could get it, without consulting anybody. Prolonged TABLE XI Distribution of Class 44 (7A) by the Studies Taken and the Hours Pursued NUMBER OF PUPILS NOT TAKING NUMBER OF PUPILS TAKING SUBJECT ONE HOUR TWO HOURS THREE HOURS Gymnasium r Library Music Arithmetic English History Auditorium Practical Work: Shop Sewing or Cooking .... Drawing 23 7 4 8 15 8 30 29 24 27 (10) 3 6 2 14 1 2 (12) 3 6 3 2 (1) 1 'There were seventeen register teachers keeping the records of this one class. SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION 107 inquiry showed dearly that with five or six exceptions all these changes were the result of childish caprice ex- ercised without restraint. Nor does class 44 stand alone. Out of eleven addi- tional Froebel and Emerson classes similarly tabulated, in six there was not a single pupil taking double work in any of the regular studies, and in the remaining five classes, not more than a single pupil in any one of them. In no class were there as many deviations from the official program in special work as in class 44. Still, such deviations as there were, were rarely educational adjustments; they were due mostly to the child's own choice, to the organi- zation of the school at the time, and to the special facili- ties available. Nevertheless, the flexible class program might easily be made a material factor in the develop- ment and regular advancement of pupils, in academic as well as special activities. But, ob\dously, no little judgment, knowledge, and sympathy are required for efficient administration. Finally, an intelligent and con- sistent policy cannot be pursued in the absence of com- plete and accurate individual records. SUMMARY Supervision in schools like Emerson and Froebel is clearly more difficult than in conventional schools. The amount expended for this purpose at Gary would seem adequate, but the supervision provided is not appropri- ate to the real needs of a system that is more or less ex- perimental in character. io8 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS The administration is not efi&cient. The problems to be met — ^program making, corridor conduct, attendance, records, etc. — are admittedly difficult of solution. Yet the modern high school has dealt with these very prob- lems more or less successfully for years. Finally, there is even greater need of wise adminis- tration and supervision in elementary schools having extended and diversified programs and operating under a departmental organization than in conventional schools, but to secure central direction and control of the needed character it will be necessary, in our opinion, to provide a higher type of administrative and supervisory talent than is usually found in conventional systems. VII. COMPARATIVE COST WHILE superintendents admit that extended and enriched programs and facilities, such as the two larger Gary schools afford, are desirable, many of them hold that under ordinary conditions the cost is prohibitive. On the other hand, boards of edu- cation have been strongly recommended to provide similar facilities and educational opportunities on the ground that, when such schools are operated under the new type of organization, they are no more expensive than conventional schools. Which of these conflicting opinions is correct? Our report on cost gives in detail the actual expendi- ture for all Gary schools for 1915-1916, and the cost by grades for the three largest schools. Comparative cost was not and could not be considered. To assemble data on the basis of which reHable comparisons could have been made would have involved an equally thor- oughgoing financial study of other cities. However, data presented in the several chapters of this present report now enable us to throw some light on the problem. The answer is not in terms of dollars and cents, but in terms of service. Though something more could be desired, the ideas of comparative cost now to be pre- log no THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS sented will not be without value from the standpoint of the considerations which determine the general school policies of a community. Differences of expense in providing and maintaining conventional elementary schools, semimodern elemen- tary schools/ and elementary schools like Emerson and Froebel are due, apart from the length of the school day, to differences in the cost of (i) Buildings, grounds, and equipment, or plant; (2) Instruction, or teachers' salaries; (3) Administration and supervision; (4) Plant operation and upkeep; (5) Instructional equipment and supplies. COMPARATIVE PLANT COST ; In considering the relative building cost of a conven- tional school and of schools like Emerson and Froebel, two questions are involved: (a) the difference in the amount and character of plant capacity required to do the same unit of service, for example, provide for sixty standard sized classes ; and (b) the difference in cost of an equal capacity in regular classrooms and in special facil- ities. There is no magic in the new type of organization mak- ing it possible to accommodate two classes where for- merly only one was cared for. Hence, when the proposed pupil instruction day is six hours, the capacity required is, as we have seen, the same whether the school is conven- Tor definition of conventional and semimodern school, see page 59, ' COMPARATIVE COST iii tional or has special facilities and is operated on the de- partmental type of organization. There is, however, a difference in the character of the facilities. An illustra- tion will clarify the issue. If a community having a 30 room conventional school plant must, by reason of rapid growth in population, provide at one time for 30 new classes, the situation may be met in one of two ways. The capacity of its conventional plant may be doubled by adding 30 conventional rooms; or an equivalent ca- pacity in special facilities may be provided. In the latter case, if the proposed program is divided as sug- gested on page 71, the 30 ordinary rooms already at hand may be used, and, in addition, it will be necessary to provide : (a) G3annasium capacity equivalent to ii| standard classrooms ; (b) Auditorium capacity equivalent to 6| standard classrooms; and (c) Capacity in other special facilities, such as nature study rooms, handwork rooms, cooking and manual training rooms, equivalent to iii standard classrooms; or a total capacity in special facilities equal to the capacity of 30 ordinary classrooms.^ The financial question before the community is, there- fore: Will a capacity in such special facihties equivalent to the capacity of 30 standard classrooms cost as much as, less, or more than, 30 conventional rooms? The cost of standard classrooms as well as of equiva- ^Seepage 72. 112 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS lent capacity in special facilities varies from city to city and also with building standards. But in the same city and with building standards in both cases the same, school architects are generally of the opinion that on the whole special faciUties, such as those in question, can be provided at approximately the same initial cost as an equivalent capacity in standard classrooms.^ In other words, a new plant for a six hour school day and a pro- gram divided as suggested above, can be procured for about the same initial outlay as a new conventional building of the same capacity; further, when sufficient additional capacity is needed, a conventional plant can be provided with special facilities for about the same ex- penditure as would be required to provide an equivalent increased capacity in regular rooms. Although this conclusion, based on a 60 class building, holds approximately under the above conditions for plants sufficiently large to accommodate an extended and enriched program, whether for 18, 24, 30, or more classes, it is subject to a number of limitations; it would, for ex- ample, not cover extraordinary and unusual facihties, such as highly specialized laboratories for each of the sciences, or highly specialized practical shops, such as iThe opinions of architects are of value, but they would be the first to grant that the issue can be finally settled only on the basis of actual construction cost. Unfortunately, such data are not now at hand. Moreover, the question can probably never be settled for all buildings, but will have to be settled for each plant separately in view of the par- ticular requirements. Among others, we have consulted the school architects of New York, Boston, St. Louis, Cleveland, and Newark. COMPARATIVE COST 113 forge and foundry. As pointed out above, such labora- tories are neither necessary nor desirable, and highly specialized practical equipment cannot be operated economically in an ordinary elementary school.^ Nor does the conclusion cover outside facilities, such as playgrounds, school gardens, and athletic fields. How- ever, if the comparison is Hmited to an elementary school for the first six grades, it would more nearly cover the needed playgrounds and school gardens, depending, of course, on land values and the land area provided. Fi- nally, the conclusion rests on the assumption that the two types of plants are used at their maximum capacities. It is, however, next to impossible, as we have seen,- to get maximum service out of a plant having special facilities and operated under the new t>^e of organiza- tion, and this fact alone would probably increase the cost of such a plant as much as 5 per cent, over a con- ventional plant of the same actual capacity. Nor does the conclusion hold for a seven hour pupil instruction day in schools like Emerson and Froebel in comparison with a six hour pupil instruction day in con- ventional schools. For, as we have seen, when the pupil instruction day in such schools is seven hours, and the program is divided as suggested on page 74, the building requirements of a 60 class school, when regular rooms are used eight hours, are equivalent to the capacity of 62I standard classrooms, and when ordinary rooms are 'See pages 82-83. ^See pages 79-80. 114 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS used seven hours, equivalent to 62t\ standard classrooms.* That is, to extend the pupil instruction day in schools like Emerson and Froebel from six to seven hours increases the building requirements a little more than 4 per cent. A kindred question is the cost of remodehng a conven- tional plant to provide the special facilities required by an extended and enriched program and the new type of organization. If the remodehng contemplates no in- creased capacity, but merely changes standard classrooms into special facilities, such as handwork rooms, nature study rooms, and auditorium, the cost of remodeling is an added expense. It frequently happens, however, that there are rooms in conventional buildings which, while not suited to regular academic work, may, when slightly altered, be employed for special activities; for example, a basement room may be used for cooking or manual training. By reason of the space in conventional plants that may thus be brought into active service, it is sometimes possible to add to the capacity of the plant enough to cover the whole or a part of the remodeling cost. Unlike the conventional school, the semimodern school has, besides regular classrooms, certain special features, such as cooking and manual training rooms, auditorium or gymnasium; and, as operated, these contribute next to nothing to class capacity. Hence, other conditions and building standards being the same, plants of semi- modern schools always cost more than conventional plants of similar capacity, and their relative expensive- ^See page 77. COMPARATIVE COST 115 ness over conventional plants increases with the number of special facilities provided. In contrast, all special facilities in schools like Emer- son and Froebel, theoretically, at least, contribute their part to class capacity. The plant of a semimodern school is, therefore, also relatively more expensive than plants like Emerson and Froebel, and, under given conditions, might, although it probably never would, be as much as 50 per cent, more expensive. To illustrate: A semimodern school might offer pre- cisely the same program and its plant afford precisely the same special facilities as one of the larger Gary schools. The only essential difference between the two schools under these conditions would be: The former is operated on the classroom type of organization, which leaves regular rooms idle when children are in special rooms ; and the latter is operated on the new type of organization, which attempts to keep all facilities in use as continu- ously as possible. In this event, when the pupil instruc- tion day is six hours and the proposed program is divided as suggested on page 7 1 , a semimodern school to accom- modate 60 classes would require 60 regular rooms and a capacity in special facihties equivalent to 30 standard classrooms, or a total capacity equivalent to 90 standard classrooms ; whereas a school operated Uke Emerson and Froebel to accommodate 60 classes would require a total capacity equivalent to 60 standard classrooms.^ Regard for economy prevents school authorities from ^For plant requirements under the given conditions, see pages 71-72. n6 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS attempting highly extended programs in semimodern schools. But school authorities, especially in our larger cities, attempt in such schools moderately extended pro- grams. Consequently their plant expenditures are al- ways more per standard class than if they were content with conventional schools, and even when the pupil instruction day is not in excess of six hours, the outlay for plants may be as much as 50 per cent, greater per standard class than if the schools were operated on the new type of organization. In a word, whereas plant cost for a departmentalized school per standard class, exclusive of all outside facilities, will probably be as much as 5 per cent, more than for a conventional school, plant cost for a semimodern school is always greater per standard class than for a school operating under the new type of organization, and increases with the extent to which the program of the semimodern school requires special facilities. COMPARATIVE COST OF INSTRUCTION ; Similarly, the comparative cost of instruction in con- ventional schools, semimodern schools, and schools like Emerson and Froebel depends on such differences as there may be in the amount and character of the teach- ing service to be procured. Conventional schools have a single teacher for each class. Therefore, a 60 class conventional school, when the pupil and teacher instruction day is six hours, needs 60 regular teachers. COMPARATIVE COST 117 With pupil instruction days of equal length, the number of class instruction hours for which a con- ventional school and schools like Emerson and Froebel must provide is the same. Hence, any difference in the number of teachers is due to differences in the size of the instruction groups, particularly in the special activities.^ With a teacher and pupil instruction day of six hours in schools hke Emerson and Froebel, the program would probably be divided three hours to academic work and three to special activities. The three hours to special activities would probably be apportioned : (a) Kindergarten and first grade, two hours to play and one hour to other special activities ; (b) Second to sixth grades, one hour to physical training, one to auditorium, and one hour to other special activities; (c) Seventh and eighth grades, a half hour to physical training, a half hour to auditorium, and two hours to other special activities.- The instruction groups in physical training for kinder- 'Gary practice sheds little light on this point. The two larger schools are combination elementary and high schools. At Emerson, in the spring term 1915-1916, for 9 high school and 14 elementary and kinder- garten classes there were 29 teachers, besides 3 shopmen, a printer, and an assistant in sewing; at Froebel, for 7 high school and 45 elemen- tary and kindergarten classes, 52 teachers, besides 5 shopmen and a printer; at Jefferson, for 20 elementary and kindergarten classes, 20 teachers and part time of a custodian; and at Beveridge, for 14 elemen- tary and kindergarten classes, 14 teachers and a practical cook. The pupil instruction day in all these schools is, however, seven hours. *It should be noted that this program contemplates no variety of specialized industrial opportunities. ii8 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS garten and first grade would probably be one standard sized class, and for all other grades, two standard sized classes; for auditorium in all grades, two standard sized classes; and in other special activities for all grades through the sixth, a standard sized class, and for the seventh and eighth grades, a half of a standard sized class. Under these program conditions a 60 class school would require: (a) 30 regular academic teachers; (b) St2 physical training teachers; (c) 3 t\ auditorium teachers ; (d) 15 teachers of other special activities; a total of 56! teachers.^ That is, 5 per cent, fewer teachers than a conventional school of the same size requires, and the ^To accommodate 60 classes three hours daily in academic work is equal to 180 class instruction hours (60X3)- Each teacher gives six class instruction hours daily, hence, there will be required 30 academic teachers (180-^6). To give 16 kindergarten and first grade pupils (the estimated number in a 60 class school — see page 67) two hours of play daily is equal to 32 class instruction hours and would require 5I physical training teachers (32-J-6). To give 34 second to sixth grade pupils one hour of physical training daily, and 10 seventh and eighth grade classes a half hour is equal, with instruction groups two standard sized classes, to -*^ class instruction hours, and would require 3^^ physical training teachers To give 34 second to sixth grade classes one hour auditorium daily, and 10 seventh and eighth grade classes a half hour is equal, with in- struction groups two standard sized classes, to ^- class instruction hours, and would require 3 ^o auditorium teachers (^-r-6). To give 16 kindergarten and first grade pupils and 34 second to sixth grade pupils one hour daily in special activities other than auditorium and physical training is equal to 50 class instruction hours, and would require COMPARATIVE COST 119 same holds approximately for all schools large enough to accommodate an extended and enriched program. Any material change in the above program conditions and in the grade distribution of classes will alter the number as well as the kind of teachers required. For ex- ample, if we decrease the proportion of the total time for special activities assigned to auditorium and physical training, the number of other kinds of special teachers needed is increased. Increase the size of the instruction groups in other than academic instruction, and the number of special teachers to be employed is decreased. It is nevertheless evident that, under given program conditions with a six hour pupil instruction day, schools like Emerson and Froebel can operate with approxi- mately 5 per cent, fewer teachers than conventional schools of the same size. But these differences do not indicate the exact relative instruction cost. The kind of teachers to be employed is not the same. The conventional school needs regular teachers only. Schools like Emerson and Froebel use regular teachers for most, if not all, of the academic instruction, but approximately half of them should have special training and specialized experience. Such teach- ers generally receive higher salaries than regular teach- 8f special teachers other than of physical training and auditorium. To give 10 seventh and eighth grade classes two hours daily in special activi- ties other than physical training and auditorium is equal, when the instruction groups are half a standard sized class, to 40 class instruction hours (10X2X2), and would require 6| special teachers other than of auditorium and physical training (40-J-6). I20 THE GARY PUELIC SCHOOLS ers. For example, the median salary of all regular ele- mentary teachers at Gary for 191 5-1 916 was $800/ and for special teachers,^ $900, Whether a difference of 12^ per cent, would be generally true we do not know. Yet, in view of the data at hand and the known higher salaries of special as compared with regular teachers in other grades of school work, authorities interested in establish- ing schools like Emerson and Froebel would be on the side of safety if some such salary differences were taken into account. There remains one other factor to consider. Sixty teachers are admittedly ample to care for 60 standard sized classes in a conventional school, but the 560 teach- ers, the estimated number required to care for an equal number of classes in a school Hke Emerson and Froebel, is the very minimum required under the given program con- ditions. To operate such a school with this number of teachers requires an ideal class distribution and 100 per cent, efficiency in the use of teachers. Ordinarily, owing particularly to irregularities in the number of classes in the several grades, this is impossible. Hence, in all probability, to care for 60 standard sized classes in such a school would require one, two, or perhaps three teachers in excess of 56I. ^See The Gary Public Schools: A General Account, Ch. VI. ' ^Under special teachers are included those of auditorium, expression, music, freehand drawing, mechanical drawing, nature study, handwork, household arts, manual training, and physical training, but not shopmen, nor the high school science teachers who also teach seventh and eighth grade science. COMPARATIVE COST 121 Therefore, when the probable difference in salaries of regular and special teachers and the probable need of one, two, or three teachers in excess of the estimated number are taken into account, it appears that the in- struction cost for teachers' salaries in schools like Emer- son and Froebel will be as much as in conventional schools and may easily run 6 per cent, higher.^ Even this conclusion does not hold for schools like Emerson and Froebel when the pupil instruction day is seven hours. If the program for the seven hour pupil instruction day is divided as suggested on page 74, and if the instruction groups are of the size suggested on page 117, a 60 class school like Emerson or Froebel, when the teacher instruction day is six hours, requires 30 regular teachers and t,t,^ special teachers, or a total of 63I as compared to 56 1 when the pupil instruction day in such schools is six hours.- ^On the basis of the median salary for regular teachers at Gary the salaries for 60 teachers in a conventional school aggregate $48,000. For a school equal in size to Emerson or Froebel, on the basis of the above estimate, there is need of 30 regular teachers, who, at $800, would cost $24,000, and need of 26| special teachers, who, at $900, would cost $24,150, or a total of $48,150. If to this there are added three special teachers in excess of the estimated number, at $2,700, the total would aggregate $50,850, or 6 per cent, more than in a conventional school. ^With the proposed seven hour pupil instruction day program for Froebel (see Appendix, Table G), 56 teachers care for 60 classes, 12 of which are of high school grade. The program requirements are, however, different from the above. It should be noted, for instance, that the 6 kindergarten classes have only a three period day and that there are 8 classes circulating as helpers; the physical training and auditorium in- struction groups are also larger. It should also be noted that this pro- posed program provides only manual training and not a variety of special- ized industrial activities. 122 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Such differences as there may be between the number of teachers required by a conventional and a semi- modern school of precisely the same size and with the same length of day arise from the fact that a semimodern school may and often does have special teachers. When they are occupied, a corresponding number of regular teachers are without classes and even the special teachers may not be kept busy. Obviously, a semimodern school will never require fewer teachers than a conventional school of the same size, a'nd will ordinarily require more, the number varying with the extent to which regular teachers are relieved when their classes are under special teachers and with the extent to which special teachers are not kept fully engaged. Differences in the number of teachers required by a semunodern school over schools like Emerson and Froebel arise from the same cause. Special teachers do not take the place of regular teachers in the former as in the latter; they are additional. Therefore, a semi- modern school, which never needs fewer teachers than a conventional school, will probably require, with the pupil instruction day six hours and under the above pro- gram conditions, 5 per cent, more teachers than a school like Emerson or Froebel of the same size, and the excess will go above this according as the program calls for spe- cial teachers and these are provided. To complete as well as to summarize these comparisons, schools like Emerson and Froebel, under given program conditions with a pupil and teacher instruction day of six , COMPARATIVE COST 123 hours, require approximately 5 per cent, fewer teachers than conventional schools of the same size, and the per cent, will probably never fall as low as this in comparison with semimodern schools. However, authorities inter- ested in extending and enriching the programs of their schools should not lose sight of the fact that the above estimate of the number of teachers required by schools like Emerson and Froebel may be exceeded in practice, nor of the fact that special teachers generally receive higher salaries than regular teachers. Hence, the in- struction cost in schools like Emerson and Froebel will doubtless be as high as, and may easily be as much as 6 per cent, higher than, in conventional schools, but doubtless never as high as in semimodern schools. Let it, however, not be forgotten that for this relatively small possible increase in expense over the conventional school, immensely larger educational opportunities are obtained. The Gary scheme is not cheap in the sense that it offers more and costs less; it is only cheap in the sense that it offers much more and costs at most only a little more. COMPARATIVE COST OF OTHER ITEMS Of the other items affecting cost little that is definite can be said. Schools like Emerson and Froebel are more complex and require more delicate adjustment than either conventional or semimodern schools, and to be effective require a superintendent, supervisors, and school principals of high type. Hence, administra- 124 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS tion and supervision will be more expensive in such schools than in either conventional or semimodern schools. The plant operation and upkeep cost of schools like Emerson and Froebel will also be slightly more than that of conventional schools, as the plant is more elaborate. On the other hand, the building requirements of a semi- modern school are, in proportion to the number of pupils accommodated, more extensive than those of schools like Emerson and Froebel, because the special facilities are for the most part in addition to regular classrooms. Hence, plant operation and upkeep cost of semimodern schools will exceed that of schools like Emerson and Froebel to the extent that special facilities are provided which do not add to pupil capacity. There will be little difference in the academic instruc- tional equipment needed. Each regular room of a con- ventional and a semimodern school has some provision for the academic branches. In schools like Emerson and Froebel it is not only possible but necessary to fur- nish given rooms for teaching one or more of these studies. Therefore, while the academic instructional equipment in any one of these rooms would greatly ex- ceed that of any single regular room in either a conven- tional or a semimodern school, there would probably be little difference in the total amount in the different kinds of schools, although for the same expenditure schools like Emerson and Froebel would doubtless be the best and the semimodern the least well provided. There will be some difference in the equipment and COMPARATIVE COST 125 supply requirements of the special branches. These requirements in the semimodern school will exceed those of the conventional school to the extent that the former provides special facilities and gives specialized instruc- tion in drawing, cooking, and manual training, whereas those of schools like Emerson and Froebel, to the extent that they give greater emphasis to the special activities, will exceed both those of the conventional and the semi- modern school. Experience thus far does not enable us to estabHsh with certainty any one of the above positions. Never- theless, there are good grounds for belie^-ing that author- ities planning to extend and enrich the programs of their systems, and to adopt the departmental type of organiza- tion, would do well to count on an increased expenditure for administration and supervision, for operation and upkeep, and on added outlay for instructional equipment and supplies, varying in amount according as their pres- ent schools are conventional or semimodern. On the other hand, they would, of course, procure additional edu- cational opportunities for this additional expenditure. SUMMARY Of the three kinds of elementary schools under discus- sion, the semimodern is therefore on practically every count the most expensive, and its relative expensiveness increases according as its program is extended and en- riched, as its plant is improved by special facilities, and as special teachers are provided. 126 THE GARY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Expenditures for administration and supervision, plant operation and upkeep, instructional equipment and supplies will be heavier in schools Hke Emerson and Froebel than in conventional schools. The building and building equipment cost, aside from what may be spent on outside facilities, will be approximately 5 per cent, higher, and there are good reasons to believe that the instruction cost may be about 6 per cent, higher. Comparative expenses cannot, however, be fairly con- sidered except on the basis of comparative opportunities. Schools like Emerson and Froebel may and probably do cost more to build and to run than conventional schools, but this shghtly increased cost is a trifle in comparison with the increased educational opportunities provided. APPENDIX CONTENTS Table A. Emerson School Program Table B. Froebel School Program Table C. Beveridge School Program Table D. Special Work of All Froebel Classes Table E. Division of Day at Froebel School Table F. Program of School No. 12, Passaic Table G. Proposed Froebel School Program I Note; • TABLE A EittBSON School P«ocBAii SPltIX(. TIRM iqi5-i6 Kl:v TO C l.A-^l^ ROOIIS Ot- TEACBOIS rvpts or Work ctpied bv TtWTlE«S XAUE^ , 8:15 1 9:15 ' TO n TO 915 , 1015 10 15 III TV) 11 15 1 lias I\' TO 1215 12:16 V I'* M5 M6 2:16 1 315 II TO 4 15 or or CLAiiSCS 2:15 3;I5 SOT. DEC. j Mill p|<;ll SH SCHOOL \VORK-lourlVn..|. _ .V Sihool L ■v.... -1 r SihiX'i -^ 104-105 I.«ds^MacNdl_ 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 6 6 7" K - u- ] IC_ 2B-2A IB 2A-2B 6 IB-C 1A-2C Luw. and Numb. 210 Brooks 6 4 6 6 4 2A-3C 3C-3B 1 Srd 3fd 3A-4C 4th 7C 6th 1 9 4th 6th 4th Arilh. and Read. 303 Heuring 9 11 8 9 7 12 Arit. & Geo. ID ~5th~ 6th II 8 12 12_ 13 14 15 16 6th 6th LaoKuaKC 310 Graves 7 9 11 11 7th 8th 7th 1 8th 7th 1 8th Latin 208 Ott 17 17" 23 18> 18> 2l« 16 7th 1 8th 8th 1 9th Math. 202 Johnson 23 IS< 20> 19' 17 18 24 17_ 18 ' 20 9th 9th 10th 9th 9th 10th 10th German 811 Child 19 23 22 16 Eng. 21 14 Eng. 9th 10th 9th 10th 10th Math, and Read. 201 Cory 16 Spec. Rm. 311 IS 16 10 Room SOe 14 21 9th 1 10th 22 10th 10th 1 10th nth 11th 11th 12th 12th 12tli French 802 Thomae 21» 20« 13 Lang. 12 Hist. Read. 23 1 - 24 ' 1 Ilan.lWk. Nat. Study 312 Flood 6 7 6 8 4 6 |0r~ ' 1 1 . - Helpers 8—11 9 U 9 Mcch. Draw. 401 Yeager Specials 21' Math. 12 b 12 g 22 Geom. 21 22 F. H. Drawing 309 I-ull 11 9 4 6 19« Cooking 116 Groenewold Specials 16 g 16 g Specials 20 17 20 Sewing 211 Anderson 21-13 g 19-13 g 15HUt.&Geo. 10 Hist. & Geo 19 1 ' -i — ■I ^ Inilustrial Tr. Shop Shop Men 21—13 b 19-13 b 16b-10 16b— 10 18 18 Chemistry 209 Engle 20 20 14> 14« 24 24 Zoology 204 Ames 7 Nature Study 10 Lang. 14« 14' 20 20 - — Physics 101 Myers IS- 15« 23 23 Botany 304 Snyder, Cora IS" 15' . 17 19 16 English - Commercial 306 White Adv. Stenog. Stenog. Stenog. Book-keeping Com. Eng. Book-keeping Reg. Stenog. TVher's A^w'ts 12' g 12«li 1 (.i;.\-l:k.\l. WORK an,l I.uncl.eon-l-our Periods r Sclw«! V .V In,,! r School .V Sch.iol I'l.iy and Physical Training 114 ; GaU I 6 22 12 14 16 20 5 7-8 4 -6 13 n 5 124 Briggs 11 7-8 1 Young 15 10 ' — 114 17 Music 218 Snyder M. E. 10-12 4 6 8 17—19' 23 22-24 21 " Expression Knglish Industry Auditor- ium Lynch 1 16-18 6 1 9-11 Porter 20-22 24 7 13 -15 Myers 1 _— ^ History 208 207 Chadwick 24 ' 18 IS" 14 13 20 Englbh DavU 18 24> Room 201 24> 17* 23 19 Room 201 English 207 Porter 19» 23 21 I T — KxDression 308 Lynch Adv. Eip. ' WhT'lJl'" ''"*"'° "* * ^*" '■"* ''^'' "« ''*" ""niber (rem period 10 pttiod Md note tie kind o( awk for wbicli the cU»s a scheduled, "en Ibe )>me c!«.^. numbe. apfiean Iwicr in the Mme period, il i«an< the cIms is di\ -Jed between the tm> tubiecl- indicaled i 1 TEACHERS o Periods TABLE B Froebel School Procrah sprinc term 1913-16 Key to Cl,xsses ROOMS OC- CUPIED BY TEACHERS , 815 9:15 'to 1 II to 9J5 10:15 10:15 11:16 III I» I\ TO 11:15 12:15 , 12:" 1:15 ^ V,S VI TO 1^* 2:16 2:15 VII TO 3:15 3.16 NOS (■RADE NAUES OF CLASSES rVTES OF WORK VIII TO 4:15 SES SEPT DEC. lUKO I REGULAR SCHOOL WORK-Tn .V School r sciwoi ■V School r School 1 Kdgn Kinder^rten 104 1 FlinnAVittke_ Icavis^MullfE^ 1^ 1 2 2 2 .. — _____^ 3 3 4 4 3 ,. — Play Stage F. W. D^andM;. Sumcriin CoUin* ^ Pease___ — _______ M. a, 5 F. 1, 6 D. 4, 5 F. 2, 6 4 „ 10 First Primao' 105 6 6 W. 5 6 5 M. 6 6 6 5 IC 10 10 IB A. M. Reading 20' Spelling 10' Writing 15' Numbers 15' 103,202.203 103 7 no class 9 8 7 no class 9 8 6 IB IB ___no class 11 10 luncheon 12 11 10 12 7 IC IB IB IB lA IB 202 Cook — -_i?___ 15 14 13 15 14 no class g lA 203 Stcphan 17 19 luncheon 16 19 17 no class 16 9 2C IC IB 20 P. M. Reading 20' Language 15' Spelling 10' Writing 15' 205 F. SebeigL- > Colvan_^_ Oingel 21 __no_class__ 20 18 luncheon 21 20 18 no cta.«s 10 IB 10 205.206.302,30 23 22 24 luncheon 23 24 22 u lA 2C IB 302 25 Aud. 26 luncheon 25 27 26 no class 12 lA lA 305 Cornelius _ 29 31 luncheon 28 29 31 no class 28 13 2C 2B lA 20 Reading 30' Arith. 30' 306 Slocum__^ 33 no class 30 32 33 luncheon 30 32 14 2C 2C 2B " 2B 3C 36 15 2B Language 30' Spelling 15' Writing 15' 308 SimpMn__ 36 no class 36 luncheon 16 2B 30 " Lytle _ CSeberg«__ 34, 201 no class 34 34-212 " 34 Aud. no class 17 2B 3C 3B Mathematics 307 37 39 42 luncheon 41 no class 40 38 18 2A 2A 2A English 306,310,311 ^_Fergison_^ 39 37 no class 42 luncheon 41 38 40 19 2A 3B 3A Mathematics 312 Bailey __ Hanway 49 no class 44 lunch. Aud. 45 43 no class 62 no class 20 3C 30 3B 301 51 53 48 46 luncheon 47 .. .. U'l 3C 3B 3A Eng. Latin 310 Lockridge no class 49 46 luncheon | 47 Aud. 47 " " -2 3B 3A 40 30 40 Eng.-Germ. 311 Gobin _ 53 51 54 48 luncheon 61 no class 62 23 30 1 ^_- 24 3A 40 4Ii -\ 1 " 1 SPECIAL WORK— Two Periods 26 Mixed Mixed Mixed 1 26 •• M. T. and D. 201 Liggett _ Aud. 7 8 luncheon 10 13 26 no class 27 ■' Nature Study 107 EUefson 9 21 25 no class luncheon 11 28 8 General 28 4C 4B 4A Music 210 Thompson no class 15 luncheon 9 36 12 Aud. 29 4B 4A I 60 Application 201,106,107 210 Pearcy 11 13 7 15 luncheon no class Aud. 14 30 4A BC I 6C M. T. and D. 212 De Vinney { 18 17 20 luncheon 14 19 22 no class 31 5C 60 60 40 M. T. and D. 106 Wetton 23 12 18 luncheon 16 20 24 32 ForRn. Mixed Expression 206 Estabrook General Aud. 24 luncheon 17 21 Aud. no class 33 5C 6B 5A Application 212,106,206 Newton 19 29 23 22 luncheon 25 16 no class 34 1, 2 Col 1, 2 1, 2 35 Out Helpers 31 32 30 27 33 28 26 36 3, 4 Col 3 4 0ol 3,4 " 31 29 37 5B 6B 5B 38 5A 6C 5A 5A 60 60 Chemistry 209 Coons Aud. no class 52 62 lunch Aud. 54 54 no class 39 6B 6B Zoology 204 Aheme no class Aud. 62 52 luncheon Aud. 48 48 40 6C Physics 111 Holliday 47 47 General luncheon 53 53 no class General 41 6C 60 6B Application 42 6C TC 6B 6A Botany 304 Monsch 47 47 Aud. luncheon 61 51 no class Aud. 43 7B 7A Drawing 101 Carlisle 41 41 38 38 luncheon no class 48 48 44 6A 7B 8B 7A 8A Drawing 309 Hess 41 41 38 38 luncheon no class 42 42 45 8C Application 46 8C 8B 8A Man. Training 120 Ringham 27 33 40 40 37 37 44 42 47 9 8B 9 9 Cooking 116 Pritchard 27 33 40 40 37 37 44 42 48 9 9 Commercial 207 Lester Bookpng. Stenog. no class luncheon Stenog. Stenog. General General 49 9 9 9 Application 60 10 Out Sewing 117 Elbe 43 43 28 26 39 39 32 30 51 9 9 9 Shops 43 43 28 26 39 39 32 30 52 10 11 10 10 53 11 "l2 11 Teachers' yVss'ts. 61 51 42 42 J4_ 12 12 " 45 45 49 49 46 46 GENERAL WORK and Luncheon— Four Periods y School A' Scliool ¥ School X School Play and Physical Training Play- rooms and grounds CaldweU O'Regan 1 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 36, 25 20,23 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 18, 22, 24 23,27,29 31, 33, 34, 37, 39 8, 10, 12 14, 15, 16, 20, 22 24,26,28, 30,32,38, 40 7, 9, 10, 11, - — Beaton 13,15,17,25, Bruns 18, 19, 21 _ Music .\udito- Chandler 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 40 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 34 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 63 42, 44, 46 48, 52 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 36 20, 23, 27, Hist., Civics Jones 29, 31, 33, — Science Estabrook 37, 39 — Industry Richardson ■ History 208 Chandler Aud. 48 Aud. luncheon 54 Aud. no class Aud. ^ — - History 208, 302 Mead 46 27 37 luncheon no class 40 46 43 ■ English 303 Taylor no class 52 Aud. 44 luncheon 45 53 49 — Literature 303, 209 CoUingwood Mixed 54 39 luncheon 43 no class 61 mixed - — Music 211 Jones Aud. 44 Aud. luncheon no class Aud. 41 Aud. -■ — Expression 211 Richardson 42 Aud. 31 luncheon no class 32 Aud. 44 ~— Library Phys. Training Home, etc. 108, 109 44, 48 52, 54 42, 46 27 26 30, 38 43,49 41, 45, 47, "- — Gymnas- ium 29 luncheon assembly 53 61, 54, 36 ^" — Parker- Haosen 33 i 1 ■ ' TABLE C Beveridge School Program spring term 1915-16 TYPES OF WORK NAMES OF TEACHERS 8:15 I TO 9:15 9:15 II TO 10:15 10:15 III TO 11:15 11:15 IV TO 12:15 12:15 V TO 1:15 1:15 VI TO 2:15 2:15 VII TO 3:15 3:15 VIII TO 4:15 \radeinic Mellen Room 1 1 (IC) Room 1 3 (1A2) Room 1 2 (lA') Lunch Room 1 1 (IC) Room 1 3 (1A2) Room 1 2 (lAO Academic "Williams Room 3 6 (3C) Room 3 5 (2A) Lunch Room 1 4 (2B-C) Room 3 6 (3C) Lunch Room 3 5 (2A) Room 1 4 (2B-C) Academic Champion Room 4 9 (4A-5C) Room 3 7 (3B-A) Room 3 8 (4C-B) Room 4 9 (4A-5C) Room 3 7 (3A-B) Room 3 8 (4C-B) Academic Falvey Room 4 11 (6C-B-A) Room 2 1 (IC) Room 4 10 (5B-A) Room 4 12 (7C-B-A) Room 2 5 (2A) Lunch Room 4 11 (6C-B-A) Room 4 10 (5B-A) Room 4 12 (7C-B-A) Art Lutz Room 2 3 (1A2) Room 2 4 (2B-C) Lunch Room 2 6 (3C) Room 2 3 (lAO Nature Study Snow 5 (2A) 6 (3C) Lunch 3 (lAi) 2 (lA^) 1 (IC) 4 (2B-C) Cooking Polk 11 (6C-B-A) 10 (5B-A) 12 (7C-B-A) Lunch 7 (3B-A) 9 (4A-5C) 8 (4C-B) Shop Eikenbary 11 (6C-B-A) 12 (7C-B-A) Lunch 7 (3B-A) 9 (4A-5C) 8 (4C-B) 10 (5B-A) Lunch 1 (IC) 2 (1A2) 6 (3C) 7 (3B-A) 9 (4A-5C) 11 (6C-B-A) 3 (lAi) 4 (2B-C) 5 (2A) 8 (4C-B) 10 (5B-A) 12 (7C-B-A) Application Mahoney Portable 7 (3A-B) Portable 9 (4A-5C) Portable 8 (4C-B) Portable 10 (5B-A) Portable 11 (6C-B-A) Room 2 12 (7C-B-A) Playground and Gymnasium Miner and Stevenson 10 (5B-A) 12 (7C-B-A) 8 (4C-B) 10 (5B-A) 12 (7C-B-A) 1 (IC) 2 (1A2) 6 (3C) 7 (3B-A) 3 (lAi) 4 (2B-C) 5 (2A) 8 (4C-B) 6 (3C) 7 (3B-A) 9 (4A-5C) 11 (6C-B-A) 9 (4A-5C) 11 (6C-B-A) Music and Expression Ashbaucher and Clark 4 (2B-C) 8 (4C-B) 2 (lAi) 5 (2A) 9 (4A-5C) 11 (6C-B-A) Lunch 10 (5B-A) 12 (7C-B-A) 1 (IC) 3 (lA*) 6 (3C) 7 (3B-A) 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ii. 46 bra " TABLE D SPEaAL Work op All Froebel Classes Dlrlng 1915-1916 and the Number of Hours for Which Each Acn\iT\' Was Schedcxed Grades in: Number of Hours Classes Were Scheduled for Various Subjects c i 7 8 8 s 1 1 > ca 1 a < 1 1 i 60 60 i ""50^ 1 7 IC IB IB — — 100 100 100 100 8 IB lA 2C lA 50 100 100 9 IB 2C — — 100 50 50 50 100 100 100 10 IB IC IB IC — 100 100 50 50 11 1 lA IB — 50 100 100 12 2C lA lA 100 50 SO 100 100 13 2C 2B lA — 200 100 100 100 14 2C 2B 2B 2C 2B 3C 100 50 50 100 15 2C — 100 50 50 100 100 16 2B 3C --^ 100 50 50 100 100 17 2B 3C 2A 3B 3C 3B 3B — — 100 50 50 100 100 18 2A 2A 3C 2A 3A — 100 50 50 100 100 19 100 50 50 100 100 20 3B 3A — — 100 50 60 100 100 21 3C — 100 50 50 JO 50 100 100 22 3B 4C 4C — 100 200 100 23 3A 3C 4C 3C 100 50 50 100 iqo_ 100 100 24 3A 4B 100 100 25 - Mixed ■ — 200 60 60 100 26 " 200' 200' 200 27 " 200' 200» 200 28 4C 4B 4A 200= 200' 200 100 29 4B 4A 5C 5C — - 300 100 30 4A 5C — 200> 200' 200 400 25 25 50» 31 5C 5C 5C 60» 32 Foreign Mixed 4C 200' 200' 200 50 60 33 5C 5B 5A 200* 200= 200 34 Colored ist & 2d | — ■ 100 100 100 36 No class 1 36 Colored 3d & 4th | 50 60 100 37 5B 5B 5A 6B 100< 100* 100* 1002 300* 100= 300* 38 5A 6C 1 100> lOO' 100« 100^ 39 6C 6C 6B 6B 6B 100« 1005 100* 100* 1002 100 100 100 40 5A 6C 6C 100' 100« 100' 100' 100« 100« 41 6C 100' 100' 100« lOO''' IOC 100" 200 42 6C 6B 6A 7A 100» 100* 200« 100' 100* 100° 100" 100« 100s 100 100 100" 100 43 7C 6A 7B 100' 100' 100' 44 7B 8B 7A 8A 100' 100» 200» 100> 200 46 8C 100' 100' 100' 100' 100« 46 8C 8B 8A 100' 100» 200» 100» 100 * Part of the class spends this time in play. "* Partof the class spends this time in regular work. The same number above the scheduled hours of two subjects indicates that the members of the particular class had a choice between these branches. TABLE E Division of Day at Froebel School spring term 1915-16 CLASS NUMBERS AND GRADES 8, lA; 9, 2C; 12, lA; 17, 3B; 18, 2A; 20, 3B; 21, 3A; 24, 4B ; 26, Mixed; 27, Mixed; 30, 5C;33,5A;38,6C 31, 5C; 32, 4C; 37, 5B; 39, 6B; 40, 6B; 42, 6A;43,7A;44,6B;45,8A;46,8A 7,1B;11,1B;13,1A;14,2C;15,2B;16,3C; 19,3A;22,4C;23,3C;29,5C;36,3-4Col. 28,4A;41,7C 25, Mixed 10, IC 6, IB 34, 1-2 Col ^Includes manual training and drawing, music, and cooking. NUMBER OF CLASSES 13 10 11 Number of Minutes Scheduled for: ACADEMIC WORK SPECIAL WORK' 120 120 180 120 180 60 120 180 180 120 120 60 180 60 240 AUDITORIUM 60 60 60 60 60 60 GYMNASIUM PLAYGROUND PLAY-ROOM 120 60 120 60 120 180 120 60 expression, teachers' assistants, helpers, science, drawing, shops, sewing. 1 Aritb. Aritb. 392 402 E 39-40 14 18 40 36 24 24 26 26 391 401 16 20 315 316 T.VBLE F PxoGSAH or School Ndhber 12 Passaic Pubuc Scboois TABLE r, Froebel School Program 1 Tt.u uj.i rOR SIXTY cussis Kev to Classes Types of 1 Rooms Work ' Occupied jLY Teache INFANT SCHOOL s ^'^'""\ ''"■'■■ '* '''^"i'-'l i«" eight ,„n.„l-: 1, 11. III. IV, \-. VI. VII and VIU s CLASS NAMFJS letters 8:15 9:15 1 TO II TO 9:15 10:15 10:15 1 11:15 in TO IV TV) 11:16 12:15 12:16 ' 1:15 V TO , \l TO 1:15 2:16 2:16 Vn TO 3:15 8:15 vm TO 4:15 1911 s 1916 ^ 1 UMBf 1917 RS - "j? 14 - ^ 16 IS W _20 21 23 24 J^o 26 27 29 30 "IT 32 kindergarten Primary Primary 104 105 102 103 lOfi flinn-Davis Francisco Chapline A , , 8 '^ 8 1 7 ' ' ' 8 ---- - 4 7 6 7 K K 7_ 8 9 Primary Nature study Collins • 12 12 11 11 9 9 12 11 "~'^~i~ Comtrucuon j Aho^e 1 V^'^t - ^-"'■'"F'"" 1 121 1 Macl5Si:£;^H„„„ KliGULAR SCHor)!. wnm.' ,-.. „ ■ . = 11 6 7 8 12 4 ^ '/-T- 3 9 1. 6. 7 10 3, 8, 9 1.104 12 2-104 6 4. 7. 10 ^ 2. 6. S" ' - " _3 S 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Math, and Eng. Hist. " •■ 202 203 205 205-203-202 206 308 306 1 Pease Hotchkiss Kennedy Stratton Gingell Simpson Slocum B , t-'l X .s i:iiM 17 E 21 M 29 H 27 E 36 H 15 M 19 E 23 E 25 H 31 E r ,s 14 M 18 M 22 E 34 H 1 li„ol 1?E 20m"~" 24 E i34H 30 E .V i. 13 E 17 M 21 E 29 E 31 H 16 K 191M 23 M 26 E 2711 14 E 18 E 22 M 30 H 16 M 20 E 24M 34E 1= i- 3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 19_ 20 21 22 23 25 Hist, and Geog. -Slath. and Eiig. •■ Hist. Mathematics Mathematics Latin 306-308-206 302 305 307 .■jy7-305-302 312 303 Stephan Scott Cornelius Ferguson C. Seberger Bailey Lockridge El 39 H 45 M 47 M 56 67 33 E 37 H 41 M 43 M 67 56 32 E 42 H 46 M 44 H 60 26 E 40 M 38 H 48 M 33 H 46 H 41 E 37 M 53 47 H 43 H 39 M 49 26 H ^38M 48 H 42 M 32 H 46 H 40E 44 M 58 3 3 26 27 Mathematics j 301 German 1301.303-312 Hanway Mact;reRor 51 51 60 52 52 60 69 69 64 56 66 54 -h 23 24 25 29 34 35 -\I. T. and D. 101 Wetton F, 15 'J 16 I 14 1 1 17 1^/ 21 1 17 20,^4 1 m 1 -'-' 30 Nature study 107 EUefson , 'i 13 1 16 1 14 23 1 ip 241^0 221 iS .Music and E.v. 108 Estabrook , 19 1 ij 17 I. r 20 1 2., 18|ji 16 1 13 1 16 '4 4 26 31 36 37 Application 108-107-101 Pearcy , 23 1 rp 21 1 ,7 24 Uo 22 \ iS 1 16 13 r6 14 . 4 27 32 Helpers Following 31 27 ^ 3D 28 25 29 32 26 4 28 33 38 .Vpplication Below F. Seberger G, 25 M 26 M 32 M 35 M| 1 35M 28 M 30 M 4 29 34 40 Application Below Gelman 33 M 29 M 1 34 M 34 M| 27 M 31 M 50 _34U«L44_ 36 M 4 30 35 39 Drawing 309 Hess > S1\4'\ 43 36 1 40 1 48 39 1 47 1 43 33 1 ,,5 1 41 33 1 -,/ 1 41 60 5_ 31 36 43 Man. Training 120 Blaine 37 Ur 1 43 36 1 ,/o 1 48 39 1 .»7 1 43 . 33 34 38 Zoology 204 Aheme 43 1 37 1 41 46 UH 35 64 54 43 1 j9 1 « 47 1 «l 39 46 1 +, 1 34 40 42 Chemistry 209 Ladd , 43 1 jr 1 41 45 1 47 1 3S 63 53 47|«l39 46 1 +, 1 34 5 35 39 44 Cooliing 116,117 Wickman , 41 1 « 1 37 36 1 45 1 47 48 \ ,!« 1 40 i 27' SpeUil Writi ademic class itotiott. t'iven lilies of Ihe c stud ALTERN ular t>pe. sc ?IODS ARE S »ic and Ex. age n ag i > 17 ag i) hour between re y-tioo minutes fo ass hour should ^^and three mini \TION OF CL cond term classe JBDIVIDED A Man. Tr. an Manual Train Drawing Arithmetic Reading Language idar class recital r supervised study be used for class r Ics for change of c ASSES IN SPE ^ are in italics, an S FOLLOWS: i D. ng & on and study per , and three minui rcilalion, twenty- asses. CIAL WORK d third term clas M Periods Arithmetic Spelling 'od, thirty-five mi es for change of ch even mimites for ses are in smaller CUS E f 40' Language Lit.. Rea Writing :ttes in ti'C KStS. uptnised type. SF.S !!, lo 48 eriods 30' H Periods listory leography L and G. Reading ao' 17' 30' in- THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD REPORTS: THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD: AN ACCOUNT OF ITS ACTIV- ITIES, 1902- I914. 254 PAGES. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD, I9I4-I915. 82 PAGES. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD, I9I5-I916. 86 PAGES. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL EDUCATION BOARD, I916-I9I7. 87 PAGES. STUDIES: PUBLIC EDUCATION IN MARYLAND, BY ABRAHAM FLEXNER AND FRANK P. BACHMAN. 2ND EDITION. I76 PAGES, WITH APPEN- DIX. THE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, BY THOMAS H. BRIGGS.* COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY FINANCE, BY TREVOR ARNETT.* OCCASIONAL PAPERS: 1. THE COUNTRY SCHOOL OF TO-MORROW, BY FREDERICK T. GATES. 15 PAGES. 2. CHANGES NEEDED IN AMERICAN SECONDARY EDUCATION, BY CHARLES W. ELIOT. 29 PAGES. 3. A MODERN SCHOOL, BY ABRAHAM FLEXNER. 23 PAGES. 4. THE FUNCTION AND NEEDS OF SCHOOLS OF EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES, BY EDWIN A. ALDERMAN. 31 PAGES, WITH APPENDIX. 5. LATIN AND THE A. B. DEGREE, BY CHARLES W. ELIOT. 21 PAGES, WITH APPENDIX. 6. THE WORTH OF ANCIENT LITERATURE TO THE MODERN WORLD, BY VISCOUNT BRYCE. 20 PAGES. * In Preparation. The REPORTS issued by the Board are official accounts of its ac- tivities and expenditures. The STUDIES represent work in the field of educational investigation and research which the Board has made possible by appropriations defraying all or part of the expense involved. The OCCASIONAL PAPERS are essays on matters of current edu- cational discussion, presenting topics of immediate interest from vari- ous points of view. In issuing the STUDIES and OCCASIONAL PAPERS, the Board acts simply as publisher, assuming no responsibil- ity for the opinions of the authors. The puhlicalions of the Board may be obtained on request