BF 1171 ■ F84 Copy 1 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 021 065 862 2 ♦ BF 1171 .F84 Copy 1 SOCIAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, PAPERS OF 1875. MIND READING. READ BEFORE THE ASSOCIATION MAY I2th, 187; BY PROF. PERSIFOR FRAZER, Jr. The following is a list of the Papers read before the Association : 1 87 1. Compidso7y Education. By Lorin Blodget. Arbitration as a Remedy for Strikes. By Eckley B. Coxe. The Revised Statutes of Pennsylvania. By R. C. McMurtrie. Local Taxation. By Thomas Cochran. Infant Mortality. By Dr. J. S. Parry. 1872. Statute Law and Comtnon Law, and the Proposed Revision in Penn- sylvania. By E. Spencer Miller. Apprenticeship. By James S. Whitney. The Proposed Amend?nents to the Constitution of Pennsylvania. By Francis Jordan. Vaccination. By Dr J. S. Parry. The Census. By Lorin Blodget. 1873. The Tax System of Pennsylvania. By Cyrus Elder. The Work of the Constitutional Convention. By A. Sydney Biddle. What shall Philadelphia do with its Paupers ? By Dr. Ray. Proportional Representation. By S. Dana Horton. Statistics Relating to the Births, Deaths, Marriages, etc. ,in Philadelphia. By John Stockton-Hough, M. D. On the Value of Original Scientific Research. By Dr. Ruschenberger. On the Relative Influence of City and Country Life, on Morality, Health, Fecitndity, Longevity and Mortality . By John Stockton-Hough, M. D. 1874. The Public School System of Philadelphia. By James S. Whitney. The Utility of Government Geological Surveys. By Prof. J. P. Lesley. The Law of Partnership. By J. G. Rosengarten. Methods of Valuation of Real Estate for Taxation. By Thomas Cochran. The Merits of Cremation. By Persifor Frazer, Jr. Outlines of Penology. By Joseph R. Chandler. 1875. Brain Disease, and Modem Living. Dr. Ray. Hygiene of the Eye, Considered with Reference to the Children in our Schools. By Dr. F. D. Castle. The Relative Morals of City and Country. By Wm. S. Peirce. Silk Culture and Home Industry. Dr. Saml. Chamberlaine. Mind Reading, etc. By Persifor Frazer, Jr. fencgraph <\\ • * MIND' READING. Often, on the surface of a stream of water which is rapidly flowing towards a narrow defile, a floating log will be carried so as to present its side to the current, and after bounding and rebounding on the obstructions, it will glide back in an eddy, to re-enter the channel again at some point higher up and renew its attempt at passage. Perhaps its branches and twigs spread out so much that its tran- sit is impossible except in one definite position, in which case it may thus be thrown again and again against the gorge and returned ; or it may be wedged for a time across the rivulet and remain a long time fixed stationary, until some fortuitous change in the conditions (such as the increase of the force of the water, the impact of some other floating body, etc.), finally accords it a passage. The case is very similar with many perplexing problems which have never ceased to occupy the attention of mankind — questions which the perennial flow of experiences, constituting the widen- ing river of human knowledge, have brought nearer and nearer to their elucidation, but which when almost within reach have been suddenly checked, or which some inconsistent newly acquired facts have driven back further from our ken than ever. Again and again have the ever-changing events of the life of civilization brought such questions back to the first barrier in ever-varied positions and relations. Some have yielded to the unknown forces which guide the general currentand have been born into our knowledge. We say we know them. But how vastly many more remain as un- divined to-day as they were in the times of the Rameses, build- ing continually, — to carry out the simile just employed, — an indefi- nitely enormous raft like that famous one of the Red river, which may extend as far back into the unknown country which is the 4 Mind Reading. source of our developmental force as the placid sheet on which we float stretches on to the unknown ocean of our destiny. 1 Such questions cannot be abandoned and disregarded by the common consent of mankind. They are integral parts of the whole net- work .of existence. Organic nature struggles to evolve them by the force of man's understanding, as the organs of the body are evolved by the processes of life. If this force be too feeble the embryo still remains — still seeks, by the irritation which its effort at development creates, a stimulus adequate to its disinthralment. In the history of the race, then, repeated reappearances of mysteries are so familiar as hardly to need citation. They are recorded under different names and in different phases, with all kinds of explanations and hypotheses, upheld with all degrees of of belief on the part of their chroniclers — as a general rule their dogmatism and conviction of the truth of their own theories be- ing weaker in proportion to the recency of the age. The fact of these inevitable resurrections has an important bearing on human psychology, for it shows that the contemplation of these objects is a condition of mental existence. Among the most persistent of these revisitants of the pale glimpses of the moon is the idea of the active participation in the affairs of men of disembodied spirits, i. e. of men and women, minus all that we are positive that men and women possess. It may be said that no people ever existed, in a state of civilization enabling them to form any abstract ideas, to whom this notion of spirits was not familiar in some form or other. The earliest records of our race present this belief, not in its incipiency, but in the full noon-tide of its existence. Wherever we turn we find this faith. It is almost common to our race, and this of itself inclines some conservative people to yield to it unquestioning acceptance. It has been often objected to the idea of the formation of the globe from a molten sphere, that the earliest known rocks, and therefore those which are chronologically the nearest to the 1 "Every day reveals to us new channels in the courses of nature ; but as we trace them back to their source we find them to be the branches of one great current, which forces everything before it onward and straight forward into the universal ocean — the end of all things and the beginning of the new ; that great reservoir from which the elements of all things are derived and to which they all return," etc., etc. Clark : " Mind in Nature.'''' Mind Reading. 5 original rock, are nevertheless of clearly sedimentary origin, 2 and it may be similarly objected to any hypothesis which would derive a belief so ancient and wide-spread from a natural attempt of the human mind to classify all phenomena — even the uncom- prehended — that the very earliest information we have of our species includes as one of its most fundamental characters, the recognition of an unseen world peopled by intelligent beings ; and moreover that in no instance, among the numerous savage tribes with which ethnologists have made us acquainted, do we . find any exception to the rule. On the contrary, it may be said that so far from a state of doubt or disbelief in such a world being the normal condition of man, such doubt never exists among the people least removed by culture from our original state, and seems to require a considerable civilization in order to secure even a foot-hold. And yet the cultivated mind cannot help reflecting on the phenomena upon which these existences are predicated, and seek- ing to bring them under some still more general head with other phenomena satisfactorily understood, /. Leaving these questions of disputed truth with the observation that no amount of testimony proving that there are no grounds why such and such a thing should not be so, can carry a conviction to one that it is so, 11 we can address overselves to an humble, 10 Clifford would probably extend the application to mathematics itself. 11 " I have finally settled down to the opinion that, as to the phenomena of so extraordinary a character, one may by dint of discussion reach the conviction that there are sufficient reasons for believing them, but that one really does be- lieve them only after having seen them." Bertrand : ** Traite de Somnambii- Mind Reading. 1 3 but not, therefore, uninteresting part of this general realm of mys tery, i. e., the communication between minds without conscious^ employment of the physical organs. Fortunately for our purpose, a case is at hand which has not ceased to be a topic of conversation among the public. It is that of the so-called " Mind Reading" of Mr. Brown. The faculty which this gentleman claims to possess is the simplest manifesta- tion of what may be called "reading the mind" — so simple as naturally to lead to the suspicion among many persons that it is merely an acute perception of those involuntary nervous motions which we cannot avoid making when our attention is concentrated on a single object. Mr. Brown takes the hand of a person, who then fixes his mind on & given place, and by moving to and fro, whereby he naturally brings the person alternately near to and far away from the ob- ject, he narrows the circle of his wanderings down to a point, which he thereupon declares to be that in which the object selected is placed, or which represents the object itself. This is of course a mere general statement which is intended to coverall cases, and not meant to imply that the action is not sometimes direct and rapid. All that is effected by this faculty, then, is the direction of movement towards a given place ; and were this done only when Mr. Brown retained the hand of the person operated upon in his own, the disposition to ascribe the general rough approximation to the place of a selected object to an unconscious guiding motion experienced in the hand of such person would be almost irresisti- ble. That unconscious motions of this kind do prompt others as to the direction of our thoughts is undoubtedly true. A simple experiment to prove this may be easily tried. Let two persons join hands, and let one mentally decide upon the direction of a series of movements up and down, right and left, in any order. In order that the experiment be successful, the amount of force exerted should be the minimum necessary. If the person whose hand is moved pay strict attention to his intuitive impressions, it will be found that one who is unaccustomed to the amount of force which is exerted by the other, and unfamiliar with the ex- periment, will succeed in fairly anticipating the direction designed by him, and opposing to its execution a resistance a little over thirty-three per cent, of the number of trials. 14 Mind Reading. Of course the tests upon which this average is founded are neces- sarily too few to furnish a reliable average ; but, so far as the lim- ited time permitted, this percentage has been tolerably constant. It will be at once seen that this average, thirty-three per cent., is but little above what we might reasonably expect from a machine whose movements were unknown to the experimenter. In other words, we should expect success in twenty-five per cent, of these experiments, as there are but four directions permitted. It might be also said that in so rough an experiment it was hardly possible for the persons engaged to decide whether the im- pression were conveyed by an unconscious muscular action before the movement, or an arrest of the movement itself at a very small interval after its commencement. To decide this would require the appreciation of a small fraction of a second on the part of the experimenters, and that without instruments or other means than their own consciousness of measuring it. This difficulty was felt to be so serious that this method of testing was abandoned, and the following modification was introduced : The hands having been clasped as before, the subject was request- ed to think very strongly of making a movement in one of the above four directions, but at the same time to guard as much as possible against communicating this motion to the hand or forearm. At a given signal he was to choose a direction, but not to execute any movement. This modification of the experiment was tried by persons who were not accustomed to perform constantaneous move- ments, but the result was that the intended direction was antici- pated seven times out of eight. The active and passive agents having changed places, of the following four movements two were anticipated correctly. Of the whole number, nine out of twelve were successful anticipations. According to this view it would be perfectly natural that some persons should be better subjects than others, or in other words, that persons who exhibited the stronger involuntary movements would lead the operator most rapidly and directly to the objects, and that independently of whether the voluntary motions of the subject — which, to a great extent, experience must teach the former to distinguish from the involuntary — were designed to de- ceive or not. It would also be consistent with this theory, that in the average Mind Reading. 1 5 cases where the muscles of the subject were too passive to direct the operator, so long as the person was not subjected to any great change of place with reference to the selected object, that a rapid removal from the room and a subsequent rapid re-entry into it, would be likely to suddenly excite such a vivid idea of the locality in his mind that the involuntary movements would be caused. So far as this goes, Mr. Brown acts in many of his experiments as if this were in reality the object of his movements. For ex- ample, at the first private exhibition of his powers given in Phila- delphia, at the Continental Hotel, the first experiment was con- ducted in this way. A gentleman was selected to secrete an object. This gentleman gave the object to me, and I put it in my pocket. Mr. Brown, after taking the gentleman's hand, hurried down the aisle between rows of benches on which were seated sixty or more persons, went into the hall and walked rapidly to the end of the corridor. Afterwards, turning suddenly on his tracks, he re-entered the room at a rapid pace, whereby the picture of the general loca- tion of the object was suddenly presented to the mind of the gen- tleman who had secreted it. The experiment was successful- Whether or not this were really the explanation of the success of this and similar experiments, is not certain ; but for this very reason these experiments are indecisive, and they form the greater part of the whole number. The same is the case with regard to selecting letters of the alphabet hung up on cards or written on the blackboard, selecting a particular photograph or page of a book, etc., etc. If Mr. Brown selects the object directly, it may be because the involuntary movements of his subject are unusually distinct ; if he wanders about very much before finding the object, it may be that his final success has been due to causing intermittent impres- sions of the object in the mind of the other; if he fail, the reason is obvious. In an experiment tried for the purpose of testing how far Mr. Brown could be misdirected by feigned slight involuntary motions of the hand, I found that it could be easily done, but the difficulty was to be" sure that the mind was firmly fixed on one object, at the same time that the motions of the hand were lead- ing the experimenter in an opposite direction. Where the atten- tion was more directed to the true place than to the causing of a 1 6 Mind Reading. deception, he was not deceived ; and in the opposite case it is ques- tionable whether the conditions were those demanded. Another instance in which I was the subject illustrates this. A particular picture in a large atlas of birds having been selected, the leaves were turned over, and, while keeping the figure of the bird in my mind, I exerted an effort to avoid giving rise to any " thrills" on beholding it. The plate was passed, but when two pages more had been turned, Mr. Brown rapidly turned back the leaves and selected it. Here I could not repress the thought that the indis- position to submit to a tedious search over fifty or sixty pages with nothing but failure as an object may have so acted upon my nerves as to have caused motions of the hand which Mr. Brown interpre- ted properly. 12 All these things and a large number of similar experiments, suf- ficiently vouched for by well-known persons of trained scientific culture in the West, Boston, New Haven and elsewhere, are in con- clusive as to the real source whence Mr. Brown derives his infor- mation; for however probable or improbable the theory of un- conscious guidance may be, it is not impossible ; and if it is least in antagonism with our experience we are bound to accept it, at all events provisionally. But there are other facts to be explained. The first, is the experiment of acting through a passive agent who is ignorant of the selected object. The operator clasps the hand of a person who is to use his mental faculties as little as possible — to remain perfectly passive : but a second person who has fixed his mind on a given place clasps this intermediate person by the wrist. The object is usually selected quite as readily in this case as in the others. The only manner in which the previous hypoth- esis can be supposed to apply, is that in this case the passive hand receives the involuntary tremors to which the active subject gives rise, and in this way leads the seeker to the right place. In order to vary the conditions of this, the two persons were requested to think of quite different things, the passivity of either being thus abolished. Mr. Brown selected with very great promptness the object thought of by the person whose hand he held. On changing 12 The meeting at which the experiments here mentioned were undertaken was arranged by Prof. Cope and myself, at the Academy of Natural Sciences, for the purpose of learning something of the nature of this power. Six other persons were present. Mind Reading. 1 7 the conditions so as to place a very "bad subject" in connection with him, and a very " good subject" on the outside, the object thought of by the latter was found. The experiment of taking the hands of two persons who were thinking of the same place was tried, in order to ascertain if a confusion of guiding tremors would ensue ; but the object was found without delay. It is one grade more difficult to believe that these indications were caused by unconscious tremors of a person not touching the opera- tor, transmitted to the entire wrist and hand of the passive subject, than that this was the case when there was direct contact between operator and subject. And if it be admitted that the very magni- tude of the mass moved by the forearm and wrist of the interme- diate person, would render the motions slower and more easy to interpret into a directive impulse one way or the other, it still is astonishing that a small object, in one case removed at arm's length above the heads of the persons engaged in the experi- ment, should be thus selected, and with apparent facility. But a fatal objection to this explanation would be the success of experiments similar to those mentioned, when the means of communication was a slack wire held in the hands of operator and subject. Two tests of this kind were attempted at the inter- view referred to, neither of which was entirely successful, though one was certainly remarkable. A number of persons held one end of a wire, their attention fixedly directed to a certain object, and Mr. Brown, being blindfolded, held the other end. In the first experiment the wire was over a hundred feet long and about one millimetre in diameter. It was insulated with cotton and wound around an iron pillar. The experiment failed. In the second instance about sixty feet of the same wire was allowed to trail loosely on the floor, the same conditions in other respects being observed. In both cases care was taken that the positions of the per- sons composing the group at the thinking end should not lead to any guess on the part of Mr. Brown as to the general direction of the object, although (as in all the experiments) he was blind- folded. The object was a ball of twine placed upon one of the tables in the large and well-filled hall of the Academy. Mr. Brown came back to the spot where this was lying five or six times, and actually touched it several times, but was unable to distinguish that 1 8 Mind Reading. this was the article. When he finally abandoned the experiment his hands were almost, if not actually in contact with it. Never- theless the experiment was not a success, however near it might have been to it. The task of dealing with facts is a sufficient employ- ment, without introducing any which might have been but were not. At the Michigan University and at Yale College the test was entirely successful. The following are the published accounts of the feats : Experiment 6. — One end of a copper wire 2o)/ 2 feet long was held by Prof. Lyman, the other by Mr. Brown, the wire being slack. Mr. Brown (blind- folded as in all cases), after turning for a moment to a person seated near by, went straight to a spot beneath the object on which Mr. Lyman had fixed his thought, which was the clock, in a high and (to Mr. Brown) inaccessible position. What he did find was an article on a shelf within reach, and a few feet directly beneath the clock. Expedient 7. — Mr. Brown left the room. An inkstand was placed in a certain position on the lecture table. Prof. Fisher, Prof. Wright and Tutor Phelps took hold of one end of the wire before mentioned, and Mr. Brown blindfolded, of the other end. Very soon, and without mistake, he found the inkstand, having passed round the end of the table, which was then between him and the three gentlemen, the wire being slack and partly on the floor. — Prof. Lyman, Yale College. * ■* # * * -* Among the rest, he was requested to take hold of the end of an insulated copper wire, two hundred and ten feet long, running from the basement to the lecture-room of the school building, while the other end was held by Prof. Brewer, in the basement. The professor thought of a hammer lying on a black board in the lecture room ; and Mr. Brown, holding his end of the wire in that room all the while, found the article after a search of nine minutes. A similar test was made with Prof. Lyman holding a slack wire, thirty feet long. And at a public meeting, this gentleman said " he would stake his rep- utation upon the genuineness of the phenomena," which he considered " of great scientific value." — Col. Olcott, in Daily Graphic. From a private letter from a gentleman connected with Yale College a few days ago, and in answer to an inquiry as to the ac- curacy of this published account of Mr. Brown's experiments there, I extract the following : " I have just had a talk with Prof. Lyman, of the Sheffield Scientific School, and am authorized to say that the account of Brown's performance in the papers sent by you is correct in every respect, it having been written by Prof. Lyman himself. The only criticism he has to offer was in the case of the wire experiment : The wire was two hundred feet long, but it was Mind Reading. 1 9 so arranged as to go into the> basement and then back into the room where the experiment was being performed, so that Mr. Brown and his subject were both in the same room. Prof. Lyman remarked that in eight wire experiments six were entirely successful, the other two were partial failures, but in each case the failure was as re- markable as the success. The Professor is a firm believer in Brown. * *. * * £[ e re g arc j s the theory of "unconscious muscular action' as entirely opposed to the facts observed." This obviously occurring theory of the manner in which Mr. Brown performs those experiments during which his hand is in contact with the hand of the person operated upon is fortified by an account of a series of experiments performed by Mr. Whitehouse, and which was published in one of the dailies here. The whole article (which is humorously headed the "Muscle Reader"), is in- teresting as recounting experiments which remove all doubt as to the possibility of the acquisition by some persons, through experi- ence and attention, of such sensibility to faint movements, and such tact in distinguishing voluntary from involuntary tremors or pres- sures, as to enable them to perform the greater number of Mr. Brown's feats. It matters not here whether Mr. Brown performs them in the same way or not. If not, nature expends in his case a quantity of a higher kind of force which might be readily ap- plied to superior ideation, while its results could be as easily effected by means of faculties common to all mankind. Water seeks the most direct course down hill, and one such natural and direct channel of explanation having been proved, the common sense of mankind refuses to have anything to do with a circuitous and (as yet) unnatural one. To this extent we are indebted to the gentlemen who were witnesses of these extraordinary proofs of Mr. Whitehouse's skill. But the humorous chronicler allows his admiration to carry him per saltum over facts which merit, from the sources which attest them, the most respectful attention, and which are inconsistent with the theory of " muscle reading." Such are the wire experi- ments before alluded to. It is as contrary to all approved methods of induction, to reject well authenticated facts, as to jump pre- maturely to general conclusions. It may well be that the greater number of phenomena exhibited by Mr. Brown, may be gathered together under the head of " muscle reading," but this does not 20 Mind Reading. explain those which remain. Nor is the public enlightened by being told in reference to this that "Mr. Whitehouse had not learned that trick yet" (J. e. the wire test). This premature assumption that all has been said on the subject, while it may answer the purpose of a daily paragraphist, shows a want of that scientific calmness with which problems of this nature should be regarded. Considering the high standing and long experience of those gentlemen who have pronounced in favor of Mr. Brown's possess- ing the power of reading the mind through a long wire, it would seem that this satirical writer, in the concluding sentence of the report alluded to, viz : that " all the fools are not dead yet," only lent to a universal truism what force there is in a personal illustration. In his introduction of Mr. Brown at the Continental Hotel, Prof. Barker stated in substance— (I quote from memory) — that scientific men were not averse to being made acquainted with facts, no matter of what nature ; that Mr. Brown was un- doubtedly honest, and that many of the experiments were not certainty solved by the application of any laws with which we were at present familiar. It is not meant to cast the slightest imputation on Mr. Brown, when it is said that the second of these propositions ought to have no weight in an investigation. No experiments can be consid- ered scientifically conclusive when their force is derived from a supposed action of the will of the subject. Asseverations of good faith, even though supported by circumstantial evidence, can be of no value in a scientific inquiry into facts. An experiment was tried to determine whether the clue, what- ever it may be, was given over the whole distance separating the seeker and the object sought, or whether it consisted in a great number of guiding impressions given at many points of the route chosen, and informing him of the next immediate /tf/Y of the route previously determined on, or which would have been naturally selected. A ventilator in the ceiling was selected, to which there was no ordinary means of access, and the mind was kept firmly fixed upon it. The movements were rapid and erratic. The sub- ject was taken out of the room and brought back again, when Mr. Brown, as if suspecting that the place selected must be on the sub- Mind Reading. 2 1 "S ject's person, endeavored to find it there. There was not the least indication that any means of discovering the direction would be found, and he failed. This again seems to corroborate the uncon- scious movement theory, for no case can be thought of which so entirely precludes unwitting guidance, as where it is impossible to convey a hint of the route to pursue, owing to the fact that there is no such route. All the experiments heretofore considered have required from the successful performer, but the one faculty of locating. It was not entirely clear whether Mr. Brown possessed any other capacity or not. From his replies, contrary impressions on this subject were gathered. In order to test this he was blindfolded and brought into the room, after which certain figures unseen by him were drawn in chalk on the blackboard. In the first experiment, which was to discover which of them was thought of, (although it was of precisely the same character as those in Which he had succeeded,) he failed. In the second, which was to discover the position of one of the same four characters on the blackboard, the subject meanwhile keeping his mind intently upon the form itself to the exclusion of its position, he also failed. The third test was as to whether, by holding the hand of a person who was thinking intently of a simple figure, he could draw that figure in chalk. This also failed. Next the attempt was made to get him to designate a simple tune from impressions received synchronously with the imaginary im- pressions of the rhythm. This also failed. It is due to Mr. Brown to state that these experiments were of a character such as he had never professed, but on the contrary doubted his ability to perform ; that they were new to him, and each tried but once. The above un- successful experiments suggested another in which he was more fortunate, viz : the designation of a particular organ of sensation. It was announced to him that the attention would be directed to a particular sensation. This he readily detected to be the sense of smell, by selecting the nose. But it will be at once perceived that by the conditions of this experiment the same possible source of error was introduced, as in the simple experiment of locating a pain, or an "imaginary pain" (as if there could be such a thing). In fact, the moment the particular sense was selected, the organ minis- tering to it at once became the true point thought of, and the ele- 22 Mind Reading. £> merit of possible unconscious indication was introduced. Added to this, in the particular case selected, it must be confessed that the natural desire to consummate a termination to the inevitable rubbing of the subject's nose, as his hand was passed in succession over the organs located in the head and face, must have furnished an addi- tional stimulus to the tremors. The trial was then made to ascertain whether the instant of a slight muscular movement was ascertainable by an impression con- veyed to Mr. Brown, and the interpretation of the answer was that it was not ; but the moment the interrogation concerned \ht place where the motion was made, it was correctly stated to be the right knee-cap. Many other experiments of the same kind as those to which he is accustomed were successfully accomplished, but they would lend no additional value to this brief account, be- cause they are all open to the objection suggested. It is undoubtedly astonishing on the one hand that unconscious "ideomotor movements" should be so general a consequence of the attention to any indifferent idea, and on the other hand that they should be sufficient in amount to enable a sensitive and im- pressible person to detect and rightly interpret them. But it is possible. No experiment which Mr. Brown performs is removed from the suspicion of this agency, except that with the insulated wire ; and this, though unsuccessful here, deserves attention from its authenticated success elsewhere. In reference to these experiments with wires in this city, an in- stance occurring in my own observation and which has not appeared in print is worthy of reproduction. One or two persons had been invited by Mr. Pugh (Mr. Brown's manager) to meet the latter in the superintendent's room of the Western Union Telegraph Company's office here, in order to wit- ness an experiment which had long been suggested to Mr. Brown, but not yet attempted. Presuming on his power to interpret the thoughts of a person through two hundred feet of wire, it was proposed to ascertain if he could receive impressions through .greater distances, and thus justify the soubriquet applied to him of " the human telegraph." Two experienced operators were present, who, having cut ten slips of paper and numbered them from thirty to forty, requested the operator in New York to get ready to hold the wire, and at Mind Reading. 23 the same moment to think intently of that one of the above num- bers which represented his age. It was a solemn and impressive moment. In the next few seconds it was to be determined whether that inscrutable ' force which had evolved the " Inferno" and " Hamlet," had really been speeding away unseen through space, from every one of countless millions of brains — now dancing in the sunlit space of our planetary system, now converted into heat and light or what not by impact with the matter of Alpha Cygni — perhaps adding its share to making up differences of the brilliancy of the earth as seen from remote regions of space. It was the critical moment in which an era might be born, and the hypothesis of the correlation of the mental and physical forces receive the cor- roboration of successful experiment. Every one in the room watched the movements of Mr. Brown in silence and with intense interest. The tap-tap of the instrument was the announcement we re- ceived that all was ready. Mr. Brown, blindfolded and holding the wire between his hands, his head bowed over the table whereon the numbers were laid, commenced moving slowly to and fro, his forehead occasionally descending to absolute contact with one or other of the papers. To one of these he returned several times, and finally picked it up with his hand, at the same time unfastening the bandage over his eyes, and handing it to the operator. It was the number 37. The silence of intense interest was only broken by the clicking of the electro-magnet responsive to the touch of one of the operators, who was announcing the result to the sub- ect in New York, and asking information in regard to it. Our impatience to get the answer made the monotonous ticking of the ' ' Sounder' ' in reply occupy apparently twice the usual time, but it came nevertheless quickly and substantially in these words : " Battery put on the wire by mistake." That battery could hardly have been so old. The three trials which followed this (between Philadelphia and Wilmington,) and of which alone I have any personal knowledge, were unsuccessful. But granting that this faculty stands future tests and can be re- lied upon, or that the molar vibrations transmitted to the operator's hand are not sufficient to account for the phenomena, what expla- nation can be offered of them ? 24 Mind Reading. The following is taken from the circular entitled "Mental Tel- egraphy," which was circulated by the manager of Mr. Brown: THE SCIENCE OF IT. Dr. Cocker, Professor of Mental Science in the University of Michigan, in a scientific essay on Brown's performances, says : — tl As to the hypothesis : he is no imposition, as he is well known by several residents in the University, who were acquainted with him before any tour of exhibition was contemplated, and knew that he possessed natural peculiarities. " Only a hint can be given as to what is the true hypothesis. A few of the cases he gives are instances of imageal representation of concrete objects in space. In order to have a representation of this sort, the optic nerve and optic ganglia, or the molecules of the optic nerve and ganglia, must have the same chromatic vibrations as in the first act of perception. 13 " The intensity must, of course, vary, because the image is not so vivid. Now if the hypothesis be true, that the nerve current is some mode of force correlated with electricity, then we can conceive how the same molecular vibrations in the brain of the co-operator may be tx-ansmitted to the brain of the operator, and a faint image of the same object produced, so that really Mr. Brown sees through the brain and eyes of another. " Furthermore, a long copper wire was attached to the wrist of the operator and to the hand of the co-operator, where there could be no tension and relaxa- tion, and Mr. Brown succeeded perfectly," If Mr. Brown has ever been capable of imageal representations of concrete objects in space, he has given in no instance specific proof of the possession of this power which can be found authen- ticated. But assuming that he had, it by no means follows that the optic nerve should have any vibrations at all. Maudsley says, in speaking of the Ideational Centre, "The reflex action of an ideational centre may operate downwards, not only upon the muscular system, but also downwards on the sensory ganglia." "As the idea is excited into activity by the impression on the senses, so it may in turn react downwards upon the sensory cen- tres, giving rise under certain circumstances to illusions and hallu- cinations." In this, as in all other cases when the idea is derived from a stimulus from without, that stimulus must first assume the character of a sensation; because, to quote his language, "the anatomists believe they have now demonstrated that the nerve fibres which ascend from the spinal cord through the medulla ob- longata do not pass directly to the surface of the hemispheres, but end in the ganglionic cells of the ' corpora striata' ; new fibres See note (a) at end of addendum. Mind Reading. . 25 starting from these cells and radiating to the cortical cells, to es- tablish the communication between the primary and secondary nervous centres." Now assuming that the "nerve current is some mode of force correlated with electricity," the conclusion that "we can con- ceive how the same molecular vibrations in the brain of the co- operator may be transmitted to the brain of the operator," seems hardly justified. If we unite the wires leading from twenty-six electro magnets, each corresponding to a letter of the alphabet, with a single wire, and then attempt to affect only one of those magnets by sending a current through the main wire, we would be attempting a far simpler experiment than that spoken of here. The same current of electricity which will produce different degrees and kinds of involuntary and unconscious muscular action if applied to the dif- ferent motor ganglia, will produce the sensation of smell if applied to the olfactory, or sight if applied to the optic nerve, and most probably ideation of different kinds if applied to the various cells of the central hemispheres. We have then a stimulus from with- out acting directly on the sensory ganglia of the observer, and through them to the cerebral cells, expending its force, first, by transmission laterally as a train of thought among them ; second, by the storing up of residua as memory of the act; and third, by reflection downwards on thesensorium commune. Next this frag- ment of the original force is divided between, first, derivative sensation, and second, molecular motion propagated through the nerves of the body and finding outlet through those of the hand to the similar nerves in the hand of the operator. From this point it is conducted either to the motor or sensory centres, and in any case through the latter to the vast congeries of cortical cells of the hemispheres, when finally what remains of force must be supposed to exercise a selective discrimination on these innumerable cells sufficient to cause a "faint image of the same object, so that Mr. Brown really sees through the brain and eyes of another." If this be a fact, certainly its explanation on known physiologi- cal principles remains one of those problems with more unknown quantities than equations to solve them by. 14 14 It matters little whether this current be electricity or magnetism, Od (as Reich - cnbach calls it), or nerve current. Our knowledge of the laws of force is suf- 26 * Mind Reading. Since Mr. Brown's appearance in this city, the subject has excited a great degree of interest, and attention has been called to numerous cases where amateur experimenters and professional exhi- bitors have claimed various degrees of suceess. Hearing of one of the latter who was said to have given even more remarkable in- stances of this mysterious power than any accredited to Mr. Brown, it was determined to give this subject as thorough investi- gation as possible. An experiment having been made with the young man referred to (who always executed these marvels in the presence of his mother, and avowedly through the assistance of spirits), and a few witnesses having been provided and the same hall selected, a series of twenty-five experiments of the same general character as those referred to in connection with Mr. Brown, were tried — such as find- ing secreted objects, spelling out words by indicating the letters in succession on an alphabet, etc., etc. Out of these twenty-five experiments but two were successful, and both with the same lady. The results being considered so unsatisfactory by the performers, a new appointment was made for the next day, when some of the same and some additional witnesses were selected. Twenty-four experiments were undertaken, each of the seven persons present being made at least once the subject. But four of these experi- ments succeeded, three of them with the same person. So far as this person is concerned, therefore, nothing is added to our knowl- edge. It may be stated that there was not the least difficulty in leading this "mind reader" in any direction, by very clumsily- imitated unconscious movements of the hand, or indeed even by mere pressure. It would seem to be a fair conclusion from the facts thus far ficiently advanced to require no further confirmation of the doctrine that what- ever occurs — whether heat, motion, sound, or idea — costs energy, and that the re- sidual energy will be less in proportion as the effects produced by the stimulus have been greater, or as that original force has been more diverted into various manifestations. In all Reichenbach's extraordinary assertions (the " Researches on Magnetism," etc., translated by John Ashburne, M. D. Hyppolyte Bailliere, 219 Regent street. London: 1851), there is nothing so extraordinary as this — that a residual current, acting through a complicated maze of centres, and con- nected as directly with one as with another, should result in an intelligible im- pression, however faint, by the excitation of those peculiar centres which alone could give it birth, to the exclusion of all the others. Addendum. 27 known in connection with this new form of mind reading, that with the exception of the wire test (about which too little is yet known to warrant a decided opinion) there is nothing to justify the infer- ence that the results are obtained by the agency of any unknown or occult force. ADDENDUM. Since the presentation of this paper, a perfect confirmation of the theory of unconscious muscular movement was obtained through the kindness of my friends, the Messrs. A. A. and A. E. Outerbridge, of this city. These gentlemen have been amusing themselves for some time in practising " mind reading;" and each of them performs the ordinary feats of Mr. Brown, in a very satisfactory manner. During the course of an evening devoted to this kind of experimen- tation, the number of the unsuccessful attempts to find objects was exceedingly small. A gentleman having secreted an object during the absence from the room of Mr. A. E. Outerbridge, on giving the latter his hand was conducted directly to the spot where the object was hidden. The same gentleman having under the same conditions taken a circuitous route through the room, was con- ducted by Mr. Outerbridge over precisely the same route. Besides these ordinary tests, some were added of a very interesting character. Thus a person who had previously secreted an object while keeping his thoughts upon the locality where it was placed, held one end of a cane to his forehead, the other end being similarly held by Mr. Outerbridge. The object was found on two occasions with great rapidity. Another novelty was the discovery of a selected place by means of move- ments discernible in the hands of a person without any contact at all. The person who had selected the object held his right forefinger in front of him and kept his eyes steadily upon it, while his thoughts were firmly fixed upon the place. Mr. Outerbridge held his own finger at a short distance from that of the sub- ject, and kept his attention riveted upon it. After moving slowly over the floor for a few moments the place was discovered. In some remarks explanatory of these experiments, Mr. A. A. Outerbridge alluded to the fact that unconscious motion always follows in the direction of an object firmly fixed in the mind. This becomes perceptible in the motions of a subject's hand to an operator who has had a little preliminary practice, and especially so if the guiding impulses are screened from the notice of him who makes them by voluntary LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 021 065 862 2 28 Addendum. motions of the hands made by the operator. The same is the case when any rigid object forms the connection between the operator and subject, as in the case of the passive subject, cane, etc. With regard to the last experiment, the unconscious guidance lies in the closing or non-closing of the interval between the two fingers. If the move- ment of the operator be in the right direction, the subject (if disposed to perform his part fairly) closes up the temporarily increased interval more rapidly than if the motion be in a wrong direction. The gentlemen to whose ingenuity we are indebted for this practical demon- stration of the theory heretofore noticed, are too well known to render any observations on this explanation necessary. As to the wire tests, various suppositions as to how they are attempted have been suggested to me, all of which are based upon the hypothesis that Mr. Brown is simply performing a trick, to which, on that account and for the rea- sons alluded to above, I must be excused for not referring. (a) Huxley says, in speaking of the hallucinations of a Mrs. A. * * *: " For there can be no doubt that exactly those parts of her retina which would have been affected by the image of a cat, and those parts of her auditory organ which would have been set vibrating by her husband's voice, or the portions of the sen- sorium with which these organs of sense are connected, were thrown into a cor- responding state of activity by some internal cause." {Elementary Lessons in Physiology, p. 273.) {b) The explanation that such selective action may take place by sympathetic vibration, as the vibrations of one tuning-fork are taken up by another in har- mony with it, is applicable only if we conceive the ganglionic cells of the cor- pora striata capable of any electrical tone, while each fibre to a cortical cell is capable of but a single one, and that the wave length of such tones is in some way altered by modifying the amount of the current, which latter must neverthe- less be supposed to pass from the ideational centres of one person to those of another, through all its transfers without change. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 021 065 862 2 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 021 065 862 2