LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, Shelf. t L££.T tsa*t UNITEI) STATES OF AMERICA. ¥0 ^ ■ V 3 ^ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, Shelf + UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. H>an MEMOIR AND ittel iDngfelloto. by Rev. LETTERS. Edited Joseph May. With a Portrait. Crown Svo, gilt top, $1.50. ESSAYS AND SERMONS. Edited by Rev. Joseph May. With a Portrait. Crown 8vo, gilt top, $1.50. HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & CO. Boston and New York. :■■■:■ ft ■ffrrY^ ^yi^f^^^ SAMUEL LONGFELLOW ESSAYS AND SERMONS EDITED BY JOSEPH MAY MINISTER OF THE FIRST UNITARIAN CHURCH OF PHILADELPHIA One God, the Father of all ; who is above all, and through all, and in alP BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY (E&e KtoermHe Press, Camfcrtoge 1894 %o s YssS^v Copyright, 1894, By HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & CO. All rights reserved. 2- W]lfU The Riverside Press, Cambridge, Mass., U. S. A. Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton and Company. PREFACE The Essays here collected have all been pub- lished before. That on " The Unity and Univer- sality of the Religious Ideas " appeared in the volume entitled " Freedom and Fellowship in Re- ligion," issued in 1875 by the " Free Religious Association of America," with whose ready consent it is republished. The other three are all from that invaluable magazine of religion and intellectual freedom, in which Mr. Longfellow took great interest, " The Radical," edited for a number of years by Mr. Sid- ney H. Morse, who likewise gives the freest per- mission for reprinting these papers. Of the Sermons, about half have appeared before in print ; but it is felt that those who have known them will especially welcome them in this perma- nent form. Mr. Longfellow, indeed, left surprisingly few com- plete manuscripts of his discourses. He would seem to have destroyed very many. But it evi- dently became his habit, somewhat early in his professional life, to write out his sermons only par- IV PREFACE tially. To this cause is due an occasional abrupt- ness of style in some of the discourses here printed. Large portions of others which remain are only memoranda, often consisting of single words or phrases, by which he was guided in extemporaneous delivery. From the imperfect materials thus avail- able it would not have been possible largely to in- crease the present collection. J. M. Philadelphia, April 15, 1894. CONTENTS ESSAYS. PAGE Theism i The Unity and Universality of the Religious Ideas 31 Natural and Spiritual • . . .74 Some Radical Doctrines 87 SERMONS. The Word Preached in A Spiritual and Working Church .... 129 The Doctrine of the Spirit 146 Parting Words 173 Sermon at the Dedication of the Parker Memorial . 195 Truth 221 Obedience 234 " We know in Part " 246 Love to God 258 The Limitations of Life 271 The Surprises of Life 288 Who is God ? 300 What is Man? 312 Prayer 325 The Home 338 Life, not Death 354 Images of God 363 " He giveth His Beloved in Sleep " 376 Stayed on God 393 ESSAYS ESSAYS THEISM I plead for our knowledge of God. There is a growing tendency in the scientific and philosophic world to set aside this name and thought. Dr. Buchner declares that " the more natural science advances in its research, the more it learns to recog- nize that nothing is created, and that nothing is destroyed, but that all rests in an eternal and self- sustaining circle, in which every commencement is an end." And Mr. Agassiz, whom Dr. Buchner has regarded as quite too much given to "preaching," says, " Until some limit to natural causes is found, there is no place in a scientific discussion, as such, for the consideration of the intervention of a Crea- tor." Mr. Huxley, though regarding materialism as a fatal plunge which " may paralyze the energies and destroy the beauty of a life," yet declares the immense convenience in physical studies of using the materialistic terminology, and proclaims the " gradual banishment from all regions of human thought of what we call spirit and spontaneity." In all this we need, perhaps, see no more than the desire to keep the fields of human thought free from embarrassing intermixture. There need be no 2 THEISM conflict between natural science and theology, if it be recognized that they lie in different planes, and work with different instruments to different ends. And there will be no antagonism, if physical science does not claim to cover the whole ground and use the whole instrumentality of knowledge ; and if the- ology ceases to identify itself with certain obsolete traditions and false notions of God's relations to nature, and no longer insists upon limiting our natu- ral knowledge of divine things to evidences of God's being and character gathered from the outward world. Natural science lies in the plane of sensible phe- nomena, and uses for its instruments the senses and the understanding, — that "faculty judging accord- ing to sense," which perceives, explores, arranges, and generalizes the facts of the sensible world. In this plane, with these instruments, it cannot find God, simply because He i$ spiritually discerned. You cannot know the fragrance of a rose by your eyes. You cannot discover a star with an ear-trum- pet, nor find the beauty of a landscape with a sur- veyor's chain ; nor can you detect the loveliness of Mozart's melody, or the passionate mystery of Beet- hoven's harmonies, by chemical analysis. To each knowledge its own end and instruments. Each hu- man faculty is adequate and valid for its own objects. One would not give up his belief in the spiritual and wonderful beauty of Raphael's Sistine Madonna, though all the chemists and astronomers and physi- ologists in the world should say that they could see nothing but paint and canvas in it. And you need not abate in the least your belief in God, though in THEISM 3 all Humboldt's volumes only twice do you find Him named. It does not follow, of course, that He is not be- lieved in because He is not named. Side by side with this tendency of science, we find certain systems of philosophy reaching similar results. The positivist philosophy finds in outward nature nothing but phenomena, their coexistences and successions ; no cause, no purpose, no law, no force even, only movement and invariable relations of sequence. Further, it finds in humanity nothing above humanity, or that looks beyond it. Its Su- preme Being is only the aggregate of the race. The- ology, to. it, is a superannuated notion. " The gods, and God, extinguished, humanity remains." An- other philosophy of which Mr. Herbert Spencer is the best known advocate, while declaring that we must believe God to be, denies to us any access to Him, any knowledge of what He is ; pronouncing it to be " alike our highest wisdom and our highest duty to regard that through which all things exist as the Unknowable." I speak for our knowledge of God ; for our ability, not only to know that He is, but in some true meas- ure to know what He is. Not by our senses, not by our understanding, do we know Him, for they are inadequate to find Him ; but by faculties as native, as trustworthy, and leading to results as certain. The senses and the understanding can, indeed, find in the sphere of outward nature only facts and their sequence. The idea of Cause is given by the mind alone. The ideas of Force, of Purpose, of Will, are given by the mind. So are the ideas 4 THEISM of Unity, of the Absolute, the Eternal, the Infinite. All these ideas originate in the human soul ; they are not sensations, nor deductions of the under- standing, but intuitive suggestions of the spirit. Again : outward nature gives us the actual ; and the naturalist finds an immense and most interest- ing field of research in finding out what is, and just what is. To that lies his fidelity ; and to that all must be subjected. But the ideal, the haunting ideal of a better than is, of a Perfect, — whence is that ? From the mind itself: from that creative imagina- tion which is one of man's chief spiritual endow- ments, a native faculty of his soul. The artist's vis- ion and the poet's imagery, the inventor's dream and the reformer's plan, humanity's heaven, beyond earth or upon earth, — what are these all but the assertion of a necessity in man's nature, that will not let him rest in what is, or in its repetition ? What are they but strivings after, not what is, but what might be, and ought to be ? Yes, what is this mysterious sense of what we call beauty, the thrill and sweet delight of our recognition of something assuredly quite different from the sense's perception of forms and colors, or the understanding's explana- tion of material structure, — what is it but a spiritual perception, which we can only feel and name, but cannot explain ? Further yet : there is a grander thrill, a nobler joy, which kindles us in the contemplation of a deed of moral nobleness ; the glow with which we witness or read of moral heroism, of self-sacrifice to another's good, of martyrdom to truth, of devotion to duty. This moral sentiment, which confronts with its THEISM 5 royal assertion of right all the allurements of pleas- ure and comfort and applause, all the calculations of prudence and all the plausibilities of policy, and embraces pain, solitude, struggle, and death, in the strength of its own supreme necessity and worth, — what is it but a primal element of the soul, utterly beyond the perception of the sense or the estimates of the practical understanding ? For is it not plain that any mere calculations of self-interest, however enlightened, or any forecasting of results of happi- ness to one's self or others, are still, in quality, an utterly different thing from the idea of right ? Self- interest we may waive, and happiness forego ; but this sense of sacred obligation, of the ought, which makes duty the sublime thing it is, we cannot set aside without the sense of violating a law higher than ourselves. Again : there is a very powerful sentiment in our nature, that of benevolence, unselfish love, — a very different thing from physical or passionate love. Its very essence is self-forgetfulness, disinterestedness. And, springing from no aim of self-gratification, it seeks as its end no mere gratification or indulgence of others, but their best good. As powerful an im- pulse as duty, and more genial and tender, it floods the world with good-will. The results we may see with our eyes and cakulate with our understanding ; but the love itself springs from no calculations ; it "passeth understanding" and is only spiritually discerned. Once more : there is an idea of holiness and sanc- tity which is different from all which I have named, though it may associate itself with them all. And 6 THEISM attached to this is the sentiment of reverence, one of the noblest emotions of our nature, a humility that in itself exalts ; which whoso is wanting in wants one crowning grace of his manhood. Lastly : there is in us a sentiment of wonder and of awe, aroused by the sublime, by the mysterious and the inexplicable. These great ideas of cause and power ; of the Absolute, the Infinite, the Perfect ; these great sen- timents of love, right, beauty, sanctity, awe, — all belong to the spiritual nature of man ; and the capacity for them constitutes him a spiritual being. The characteristic of all of them is that they are primal, intuitive, spontaneous. They are not infer- ences, but perceptions. They cannot be analyzed ; for they are not results of any aggregation of details, but are primitive and simple. They do not come in at the end of any argument of the logical faculty. They are not deductions, but postulates. The truths they reveal are truths of the spiritual reason, not of the practical understanding. And they have this characteristic, that they are self-evident. By which I do not mean that every human being rec- ognizes them consciously ; but that, if they are seen at all, they are seen by their own light, are their own proof. They are native and original to the spiritual constitution of man, and under certain circumstances spring up involuntarily in his consciousness. These ideas all point to and culminate in the idea of God, the highest and sublimest idea of which hu- man reason is capable ; around which gather all these noblest sentiments I have named. This is an idea primitive and spontaneous in the human soul. THEISM 7 The idea of God is the idea of a Unity behind and through all the diversities of phenomena ; of an Absolute, which is the substantial ground of all things changing ; of an Infinite, which is the source of all things finite ; of Essential Cause and Uni- versal Creative Force. It is the idea of absolute reason, of perfect wisdom, of absolute right, of per- fect justice, of absolute good, of perfect love, of the supreme beauty, of the supreme sanctity, the ineffa- ble mystery, of the highest object of reverence and awe, of love and trust. This idea of God is awakened in the human soul by whatever in the natural or the moral world moves us profoundly ; in its ruder and lower forms by what inspires terror, as the tempest and the earthquake ; l or by mere wonder, as in magic or so-called miracle ; in its purer forms by the vision of order, grandeur, beauty, truth, righteousness, holiness, love. But thus far I have only shown the existence of certain ideas in the human soul. How do we know that there is any Reality out of ourselves correspond- ing to these ideas ? I answer that we are so constituted that, when these ideas spring up in our mind, there springs up with them, necessarily, the sense of the reality of an object from which they originate and which they 1 When Alexander Humboldt says, describing the terrific scene of the Caraccas earthquake, that the church bells began to toll, but it was no human hand, but the hand of God, that sounded them, the statement seems to me as unspiritual as it is unscientific. Better were the words of the young Goethe, after hearing a sermon upon the earthquake at Lisbon : " The preacher might have known that no- thing which could happen to a mortal body could harm an immortal soul." 8 THEISM present. And we call these ideas intuitions, because there is involved in the experience of them this sense that they are perceptions of an object upon which they directly look. In other words, we know this objective reality of divine things through our instinctive faith in the trustworthiness of our faculties and their percep- tions. If we are deceived in this, then we have no means of knowing anything whatever ; since all that we know must be known through our faculties and through our confidence in the trustworthiness of those faculties. The scientist sets out with this pos- tulate, that his powers of observation and compari- son, his senses and his understanding, can be relied on. If they cannot, no knowledge of the outward world is possible. This faith is involved in all he does. And he takes it without proof, as a self-evi- dent certainty. Still further : the very existence of an outward world is known only by this faith. We think that we see and touch the outward world ; and I believe we do. But the metaphysician can easily show us that all we are really conscious of is certain impres- sions and sensations in ourselves. Nevertheless, we are so constituted that with those subjective sensa- tions there springs up, involuntarily and necessarily, the sense of a real objective world corresponding to them, and from which they proceed. And that is just what I said about our spiritual perceptions and a real spiritual object corresponding to them, and from which they proceed. There have been mystics, absorbed in the con- THEISM 9 templation of spiritual things, who have denied any real existence of the outward world and called it an illusion. There have been men, absorbed in the contemplation of outward things, who have denied the existence of any spiritual world, and declared that God, soul, right, beauty, immortality, were but words for fancies and illusions. But all sound, practical men believe that they see and touch a veritably existing world of matter, and that the faculties by which they deal with it in the carrying on of their outward life are trustworthy. 1 And all spiritually-minded men believe in the reality corresponding to the ideas of truth, right, and good ; to the idea of God as the ground of truth, right, and good ; because they instinctively trust in their spir- itual faculties. And in both cases experience justi- fies the trust. Not that in either we are infallible. Not but that our senses sometimes deceive us, and our practical judgments sometimes lead us wrong ; but on the whole, rightly used, they can be relied upon. Not but that our spiritual perceptions some- times lead us astray ; but on the whole, rightly used, they can be trusted to lead us aright. In other words, our native faculties are adequate to their purpose, and their perceptions are valid ; 1 Professor Huxley says, indeed, " After all, what do we know of this terrible ' matter ' except as the name for the unknown, hypothet- ical cause of states of our own consciousness ? " A scientist may say this in his speculative moments. But how long will it be pos- sible for him to go on with his study of nature if he really believes that he is dealing, not with actual existences, but only with states of his consciousness ? He could not do it for a day, not for an hour. He must believe in the existence, out of his own mind, of the carbon, the atom, the fibre, the cell, the protoplasm. IO THEISM and the more completely adequate and valid in pro- portion as they are developed by healthy use in their appropriate direction. It is, then, in behalf of our spiritual nature and our spiritual faculties that I plead for our knowledge of God as real. Our spiritual reason testifies of Him ; our moral sense declares Him ; our sacred affections bear witness to Him. Imagination makes Him known in his beauty. Reverence bends before his majesty, his mystery, and his sanctity. Thus, with consenting voice, in the heavens of the soul do rea- son, conscience, and heart declare their knowledge of God. And if the human spirit images God from itself, it is because it is itself made in his image. So, I say, we know God. Not, of course, with the same kind of knowledge as that with which we know the material world, but with a knowledge as sure ; not with the same kind of certainty, but with a certainty as satisfying. I do not say that we comprehend Him, but that we truly apprehend him. We know Him "in part." But that part is the beginning of a continuous know- ledge of Him, advancing with our spiritual growth. Of course, if you insist, with a modern school in philosophy, upon confining the term " knowledge " to that which is obtained by the senses and the scientific understanding, then, indeed, God is not " knowable." And if that strict meaning be agreed upon, let its definition be kept in view, and we will seek another word. We will say that we apprehend God, perceive God, have access to Him ; that He is revealed to us by faith. But then we must under- stand that faith is a ground of certainty. Paul THEISM 1 1 defines it as the evidence or assurance of things not seen. Goethe calls it the " immediateness of divine feeling." 1 It is an assurance on sufficient, but interior, grounds. But I see no reason why we should not, at least until these definitions be settled, use the word " knowledge " in its ordinary sense of rational appre- hension, and say we know God ; only remembering how it is that we know Him ; by what high faculty of the soul. But not only do we know God in the sense of knowing that He is. If that were all that were possible for us, I sup- pose we should be thankful for that. If our belief that we know more be but a delusion, we must be willing to let it go, though half our life seem to go with it. For it must always, in the end, be best for us to know and accept the truth about anything. And we must thank the hand that tears even a cherished error from our mind. No error can be good for us when we are able to know the truth for 1 This is the passage : " Strictly considered, I can know nothing of God but what the very limited horizon of sensible perceptions on this planet affords ground for, and that, on all points, is little enough. Hereby, however, it is by no means asserted that by this limitation of our observations on outward nature limits are likewise set to our faith. On the contrary, the case may easily be that, by the immediateness of divine feeling in us, knowledge must necessarily appear but a patchwork. There are primary phenomena," he adds, " which in their divine simplicity we ought not to distrust or disparage by useless inquiries, but leave to reason and to faith. Let us endeavor to press forward courageously from both sides. Where knowledge falls short or appears inadequate, we must not contest with faith its rights. As soon as we set out from the principle that knowledge and faith are not given to destroy each other, but to supply each other's deficiencies, we shall come nearer to an accurate and ri^ht estimate." 12 THEISM which it stands, or in the way of which it stands. We can always bear the truth. But I am persuaded that it is no delusion when we have believed that we knew God, not only to be, but to be infinitely wise, good, loving, just, beau- tiful ; to be the very essence of wisdom, goodness, love, justice, beauty. I am persuaded that it is not a delusion when we have felt, in our moments of goodness, love, justice, and spiritual beauty, that we were very near to Him and He to us, even that He was dwelling in us. Witness the glo'w that flows like warm life-blood about our heart when we hear but the reminiscence of such experiences. Witness the chill and the desolation and sense of loss with which we hear ourselves denied that access to Him. Witness that inextinguishable longing of the human soul to know God, and feel Him not afar off, testi- fied to in the whole long history of mediators, inter- cessors, revealers, which human need has constructed to bridge the chasm and bind itself to God, when its creeds have taught Him to be remote, inaccessible, or alienated. Only so can the heart be satisfied. If God be hidden from us, a Christ is made his mani- festation. If He be inexorable, a loving Jesus, or tenderer Mary Mother, is made to fill his place. If He be inaccessible to our prayer, the intercession of saints is sought. If we have no native faculty of knowing Him or his will, a book revelation is proclaimed. If He be hopelessly far away, hosts of disembodied spirits will men seek, to learn their duty and find the spiritual guidance they need be- yond themselves. History tells us that the periods of unbelief in God THEISM 13 have been precisely those most infested by supersti- tions and prodigies and incantations. When the true God is taken away, men cling to anything that may connect them with the spiritual world. The spiritual nature, defrauded of its right, seizes the nearest counterfeit. Nor can even the companion- ship of the wise and good of earth satisfy that secret aspiration which yearns beyond the earth. And, sufficient as the soul is to itself, it yet cannot live alone. But here some one may say to me, — and I will here meet the objection, — almost all Christians will tell us that they feel the very same chill and sense of loss and desolation of which we speak when we take away from them the " Christ " on whom they lean. Of his nearness they feel the same need and the same persuasion that we feel in regard to God ; he is their only reliance, and the sweetness of his presence is their strength and their consolation and their peace ; through him alone they have hope of forgiveness, access to heaven, and assurance of im- mortality. Yet we pronounce their faith an error and a delusion. Why is not the witness of their hearts to Christ as trustworthy as the witness of ours to God ? If they are mistaken, why may not we be ? I answer that certainly I claim no infallibility, and that any positiveness of statement on my part is only the expression of sincere conviction of what I hold true. But I am confident that no error has kept any strong or lasting hold upon human minds unless it represented a truth higher than itself. It has been that truth, so dimly seen as to be erroneously ex- 14 THEISM pressed, to which the heart has given its allegiance ; and that truth, being higher, larger, contains all that was good in the error, and more. What a devotee of Christ, of Mary, has prayed to, has clung to, was a spiritual power and love higher than, yet akin to, himself ; that is, God. And when I bid him give up the idol (eidolon, image) Christ, it is that he may find the true, invisible God whom Christ has imaged to him ; that he may find Him, not through his representative manifestation, but in himself. It is He that has been hearing his prayers ; why not address them to Him ? It is He that has answered them ; why not hear his voice ? Has he, from child- hood on, been saying daily his prayer, "Our Father who art in heaven, " and never believed that the Father could receive it ? Every time, he ended it with no mention of intercessor through whom it was offered, or master as whose disciple he proffered it, and has he never believed that it could so reach Him? He may have fondly thought that he could "see more of heaven reflected in the eye of Jesus" than he could find elsewhere. But let him look up, and lo ! in his own eye the whole blue heaven is mirrored, and he sees face to face. He has clung to the hand of Jesus ; if I unclasp it, it is that he may touch the Father's hand, and, folded in his embrace, and looking into his face, know at last in whom he has trusted. For it was He that was with him, and with whom he talked, though he knew Him not. He was never inaccessible to him, never unwilling or unable to hear him, forgive him, 1 redeem him. 1 By forgiveness we are to understand, not removal of penalty, but healing and restoration, and assurance that penalty is redemptive. THEISM 1 5 Quite otherwise is it when one would take from me as a delusion my faith that I can know God, and in some true sense and measure know what He is and find Him near to me. There is no higher truth for which I can exchange that faith, and of which it was the imperfect and erroneous expression. To give me humanity is to give me less. To give me myself, and my ideal as the image of my own possi- bilities, is to give me a lower, not a higher. If it be true, indeed, I will accept it and bear it as best I may, as I can bear all losses. But if it be not true — I thank God for the assurance I have that it is not ; that, when my heart yearns upward for a divine love, and an assurance meets it of an answering love, it is really embosomed in an unspeakable divine ten- derness ; that this loving-kindness and tender mercy of our God is not left merely to be sought for and inferred from the multitude of outward blessings, and the manifold sources of happiness afforded in surroundings of our life ; but is experienced, as we experience the highest human love, not through what it does for us, but in its own living presence. Not the proofs of love, but the love itself, is it that my heart feels in answer to its uplifted longing; and with all its unspeakable comfort, cheer and strength and sweetness and peace. And when, in some hour of doubtful or difficult duty, my moral sense, my conscience, has sought to know the right, or to be nerved to faithfulness to the right, and, looking beyond itself to Him, the Infinite Justice and Perfect Righteousness, has found itself illumined and invigorated, helped to see clearly and to be true, come what might, I do not believe that it was a delusion. 1 6 THEISM And when the mind, searching after truth, baffled and struggling, but pursuing, like one making his way through forest and thicket towards the light of mountain-summits beyond, has found itself suddenly freed into the light of a great truth seen to be an everlasting law, and thanks God in its joy for the revelation, it has not been mocked in the thought. Light was waiting us as we sought the light, and it was from beyond ourselves that it came. In such moments we always feel that the truth which is free- ing and exalting us is not anything of our own crea- tion or possession. Our reason has communicated with the depths of the Universal Reason, has looked upon the Eternal Truth, and has received his inspi- ration and revelation. And when, in presence of nature's majestic beauty or gentler loveliness, the imagination is kindled into awe or stilled into peace, and we feel a sense of an invisible and supernal beauty, a spirit in nature, which makes the scene so sublime, so fair, — " The light that never was on sea or land, The inspiration and the poet's dream," — it is not idly that the name of God springs to our lips or our thought, — the name and the thought of Him " who out of his own beauty maketh all things fair." But this is not only our individual experience, which might be an idiosyncrasy, which, if it were peculiar to ourselves, we might suspect to be unreal. Those to whom we speak of it say, So I have felt, so I have thought. Multitudes upon multitudes of witnesses, from far-off times and distant regions, add their testimony. It is wellnigh universal. Saint and THEISM 1 7 reformer and prophet and philosopher and martyr and poet and artist, and men of genius in all times, have declared that a power beyond themselves moved them, and spoke or worked through them. And humbler men, in quiet, homely ways, have testified to the visits of the Spirit in their heart. And, in all times, men who have not claimed this as their own experience or deemed it possible for themselves, have yet believed it true that others, as prophets, were inspired of God. It is conceivable that all this belief, all this assur- ance, springing up in the minds of men of such dif- ferent race and culture, in so remote and separated times, can be without foundation ? No doubt men have often made mistakes about their own and others' inspiration ; but all of this cannot be a mistake, all a delusion. There was some ground for their errors. For, as I cannot believe that, if there were no God, — whatever mistaken notions men may have had about Him, — men could by any possibility have almost universally conceived of Him, so if He were not accessible to man, and if man were not accessible to Him, I do not see that the idea of his presence, communion, inspiration, indwelling, could ever have sprung up in so many minds, or in any mind. I ad- mit the abundant false notions about God, and about his relations to us, in past ages and in our own, in heathendom and in Christendom, — gross and crude and wicked and foolish conceptions. But I summon even these to witness on my side ; to testify to the reality of the ground-idea of God and his communion with us ; that ground-idea and central truth which they so poorly expressed, but which, with all their 1 8 THEISM grossness or folly, they could not extinguish, and without which they could not have existed. If we call this contact with God inspiration, and its results revelation, it has been customary to regard it as confined to a few persons especially selected by the divine volition as the channel of illumination and communication, and supernaturally (that is, miraculously and not under any constant law of the spirit) endowed or possessed. The speech, or re- ported speech, of these men is counted the speech or word of God. As such, it is declared to be infal- lible, or virtually so ; the divine rule of faith and practice ; not to be questioned, not to be judged ; authoritative, without appeal. If any man will know the truth or the will of God, there it is recorded ; let him read and obey. The objections to this theory are obvious from any spiritual point of view. The Theist declares inspiration and revelation to be the action of a con- stant force, under a constant law; that is, under fixed conditions (as all forces must be in an orderly or God-governed universe). The difference between the spiritual mind and the external mind is one of kind. But the difference between a prophet and any spiritually-minded man is only one of degree, depending entirely upon the degree in which the conditions have been fulfilled. For the germs of spiritual-mindedness are in every human soul, how- ever undeveloped, else no inspired teacher could convey a spiritual truth to it. Try to convey what sight is to a blind man, and you will see that this is true. The responses which reason, heart, or con- science make to the prophet's word are but the THEISM 19 springing to life of the inborn germ. They are the opening of an eye whose nerve is made for sight. How native to us always seems a new truth ! There is no need to call the extraordinary gift superhuman or miraculous. There is no more familiar fact in the world than this of extraordinary men, — men of genius we call them ; men so happily constituted, and so faithful to their gift, that their faculties play with unobstructed freedom in some special direc- tion, so that in poetry or science or art they tran- scend their age. You cannot compute the time and culture that would be needed to bring the average mind or average imagination up to them, even to the full comprehension and enjoyment of them. Yet we do not think there is anything superhuman or miraculous about them. They have only in supreme degree qualities which all men have in lower degree, at least in possibility. Is there any reason why it should be otherwise in the sphere of religion ? Spir- itual superiority, spiritual supremacy even, if that could be established, — do these any more implicate a superhuman and a miraculous ? In view of this, nothing, it seems to me, can be more futile and ir- relevant than the question so often triumphantly asked, If Jesus was but a man, how is it that none equal to him has since appeared ? But, in truth, I hesitate to speak of him ; be- cause I wish to say only the exact truth. And what means have we of knowing the exact truth about him ? What can we know of him except that he must have been a man, and that he was the centre of a vast religious movement which envelops us ; a movement, however, which by no means originated 20 THEISM with him, and which came to include in its complex progress many powerful influences beside his. I do not now insist upon the uncertainties which modern criticism has thrown about the authorship and contents of the Gospels. I do not dwell upon the elements of myth, Messianic conception, and doctrinal tendency, which have been shown to be contained in them. I speak only of what is admitted by all. We have not a single written word of his. Nay, we have but three or four words that profess to be reported as he spoke them. 1 What we have are confessedly fragmentary reports of his words written down from memory and tradition many years after the events, and in a language different from that in which he spoke. Even the original reports we have not ; only later copies of them, differing among themselves. Finally, the immense majority of Christians have access only to a transla- tion of these copies. So that we stand at three or four removes from those words of Jesus which are declared to be the supremely authoritative words of life. Is it strange that a Theist should hesitate in according them such authority as his words, seeing no ground whatever for believing that they have been miraculously preserved from the natural effects of this multiplied tradition ? Is it strange that he should think it easier to know what is true than whether Jesus really said it ; to know what is right than whether Jesus did it ; and should accord to any 1 Such, for instance as " talitha cumi," in the account of the rais- ing of the daughter of Jairus; where, by the way, though he is rep- resented as saying distinctly, " She is not dead," yet the whole Christian church asserts that she was dead and was miraculously brought back to life. THEISM 2 1 words attributed to Jesus only the value which his own mind, heart, conscience can find in them ? And this in no spirit of rejection, still less of defi- ance, but simply in fidelity to the truth ? Is it strange, in short, that when he is bidden to come to Jesus he should answer, Jesus is no longer here ; I could only go to some imagination of him — to his portrait, as Francis Newman says ? But God is here. To Him will I go. He has the word of life for me. And that word abideth forever. Then, for the time-honored and time-worn watchword, " Christ and him crucified," I would substitute, God, and Him infinitely near. " For he is not far from any one of us," said Paul. " God dwelleth in us," wrote the Augustan poet, Manilius, and the Christian John. " Not even our own thoughts are so nigh," said the German mystic, Tauler. " Nearer to our souls than our bodies are," wrote William Law. When we remember that He is spirit and that we are spirits, we comprehend how that can be. By our spiritual nature we have access to Him, and He to us. That is the mediator and revealer, the God-in- man ; for in the highest action of our spirits we can- not distinguish between the human and the divine. In those exalted and mysterious moments, we and our Father are one, as the mingling waters when the ocean floods the river with its rising tide. There are two ways by which this access of our souls to God and this responsive inflowing are ac- complished, of which I shall briefly speak. The first is prayer. It may or may not be spoken in words. The 22 THEISM prayers spoken in words are, we all know how often, an offense to the spiritual sense, such utterance of hardened formulas, of petrified phrases, such mum- mies of piety, dead so long ago. So irrational, so impious, save for some good intention, we wonder that God can have patience with them and does not cry out from the skies, " Be still ; and know that I am God." But I do not think that He hears them. Those rattling words cannot pierce to the realm of spirit where He is. But, again, a spoken prayer, our own or another's, may be such an outgoing of the spirit that it shall quicken the slumbering heart and lift up the fainting thought, and wing our affec- tions into the heaven behind the veil. The essence of prayer is aspiration, the yearning and seeking and desire of the soul. Then it matters not what words are uttered — all words of prayer are symbols ; they are forms of feeling, not of criticism ; not the mathe- matician's exactness, but the poet's freedom, belongs to them. And the highest result and reward of the conscious prayer is the unconscious, the perpetual frame of trust and reverent humility before God, which is the prayer without ceasing. We err if we think prayer to be alone or chiefly petition, the ask- ing for this and that. It is the cry of the spirit for help in time of need ; but chiefly it is the heart set- tling itself to rest in the divine sympathy. It is the conscience bathing itself in the divine righteous- ness. It is the will nerving itself by contact with the divine energy. It is meditation and contempla- tion and communion. It is the spontaneous out- burst of joy. It is said of Theists that they do not pray. Very likely they do not " make " so many THEISM 23 prayers. One of their number, I think, expressed her regret that it was so ; and a Liberal Christian added the comment, " Ah, if theism would but pray, and so become a religion ! " But the orthodox Chris- tian makes the same charge against the liberal, pointing to infrequent family prayers, prayer-meet- ings, and the like. Yet the orthodox Protestant need not boast ; the Roman Catholic prays more times than he ; has his church open every hour of every day for the devout ; prays to the Virgin and a multi- tude of saints, as well as to God and Christ. Do you remember what Luther's wife, Catharine, said, " How is it, Martin, that when we were Catholics we prayed so often, and now so seldom ? " Let us remember that many prayers may not be mucJi prayer. There is a measure of quality as well as quantity. Surely there can be nothing in the faith in God, and Him infinitely near, that can hin- der prayer in the spiritual sense. But the Theist's prayers must be different from another's. He will not ask God to give him the things he should get for himself, nor to do for him what he ought to do for himself, or to do for the world what it is men's work to do for it. But he may ask for help to see his duty and do it faithfully to himself and others ; and the calm thought of the serenity of Infinite Wisdom, and the breadth and depth of Infinite Love, and the steadfastness of the Infinite Will to good may clear his mind to see, and quicken his heart to feel, and his will to do. And, for answer to prayer, this powerful influence of having touched the In- finite will satisfy him. He will not expect God to occupy himself in an individual and special manner 24 THEISM with him. The individuality and the specialty are on the human side. When I go out under the open sky in one of these clear, radiant days, and breathe in the invigorating air, I do not wish that the air should be seeking me. It is searching me through and through. I joy in the sunshine, but I do not wish it to be selecting me to direct its warmth upon. Enough that I bathe in the light, the air, the warmth, and am filled by them as they are bountifully spread for me as for all. So it is with the truth, the love, the strength, the peace of God. They are for me because they are for all. I do not think that God gives us things in answer to our prayer. To true prayer He gives somewhat of himself, which enables us to get the things, or to do without them. If we are inspired by God when we seek Him, it is that we inspire Him, — breathe Him into our spirits. Few men, the physiologist will tell us, breathe full breaths of the vital air. How few souls breathe full breaths of the Divine Spirit ! The second access to God is through obedience, — the doing his will. Of this, too, I might say that it is rather his access to us. And I must say, in brief, that whenever we are putting forth our wills in the direction of his will, — that is, in doing right and doing good, — then his will with its divine energy reinforces ours and acts through us. It does so, whether we are conscious of it or not ; just as surely as, if you direct your telescopic tube in the line of a star's light, that light penetrates it ; just as surely as, if you suspend a piece of iron in the line of the magnetic currents, it becomes a magnet ; just as THEISM 25 surely as, if you build a wall upright, the force of gravity holds it firm. And remember that God's will is not a single volition or series of volitions, but a constant force, a perpetual, unbroken energy of good, everywhere pressing for entrance through human wills to sustain, redeem, and perfect the cre- ation. There is a notion which was prevalent among mystics in former ages, and has been revived in a certain shape in our own time ; I mean the notion that inspiration is best obtained through passivity of our own minds and wills. Not into the vacated mind and heart does God come, or any high spirit ; but into the active mind and heart. Even our medita- tion must be a contemplation, not an idle reverie. Not the crucifixion of our will does He ask, as devotees have taught, but the active consecration of our will. God must need a strong will to work his purposes, not a broken one. It must be a will, in- deed, turned away from all self-indulgence and every form of self-seeking. But when, endeavoring to do God's will, we are most self -forgetfully absorbed in that work, and most filled with Him, then we are most ourselves ; our obedience is our perfect free- dom. Tennyson has well expressed it in the familiar lines : — " Our wills are ours, we know not how ; Our wills are ours, to make them Thine." For to man as a spiritual being is given the privi- lege of conscious voluntary obedience to the divine law, found to be also the law of his own being. This privilege he owes to the freedom of a will separate from God, though not separated from Him ; a free- 26 THEISM dom of whose reality we are conscious, while we are equally conscious of its limitations. The materialistic Pantheist may lose God in na- ture ; the mystical Pantheist may lose man and na- ture in God ; the Theist finds God in man and in nature, and beyond them. For when a man has thus found God in himself, — in his own spirit and through his own spirit, and in true and holy men, — he may go out into nature, and he will find it full of his presence, his power ; though he would never find that presence in outward nature till it had first been found in human nature. He will find God not superintending the world from afar, but moving it from within, close to every atom, in all forces, which will be seen to be but forms of the one universal cosmic force, which He is. The majestic, all-encompassing, all -penetrating sweep of that force is his creative will in nature ; his will, not, as I said, a series of separate volitions, but an immanent energy. Its tides flood every cranny of the universe. God is in the sky and the sea ; in the constellations and the grain of sand. He is in the sunshine and the tempest ; in the blossoming clover and the falling rain. Wherever his power is, He is. Wherever is beauty, He is. Wherever is life, He is. Wherever is beneficence, He is. What is hard and maleficent in nature is only so much as is not yet completely created and filled with his purpose of love. But it is only as cosmic force, of life, order, unity, and beauty, that we find God revealed in the outward world. In the soul of man, alone, He is revealed in his grander moral aspects. There alone THEISM 27 He is revealed as person. For there He is revealed as thought and purpose, as love and righteousness ; and these are qualities of person and not of thing. So, though conceiving of God as the infinite, all-per- vading spirit in the world of matter and of mind, we still say He, not It. Of the presence of God as providence in human affairs, I have left myself little space to speak. The Theist finds this presence in continuous order, and not in interrupting miracle ; in perfect law, not in supplementing interference. This providence is, to him, not special intervention, nor yet mere general superintendence, but perpetual and universal saving presence. He discovers a law of progress and evolu- tion leading on toward perfection for the individual and the race. All human freedom, though real within its limits, is held within the control of this supreme will of good. We may not be able, in human events, to distinguish between God's will and the sum or resultant of human wills. But we know that the human wills that have aimed at justice and good have been workers for God. In the late strug- gles of our country's new birth, we have been led to see most impressively a will of justice above human wills, which yet acted through them ; the working of divine forces which included the human. In these years of intense experience how many souls have met God face to face, and known Him, as never before, in the inspirations of duty and in the revela- tions of self-sacrifice for ideas ! I see that a move- ment is making among some well-meaning but nar- row-minded persons to get inserted into the national constitution a formal recognition of God. But, in 28 THEISM the amendments which insert justice into that con- stitution, God is put into it far more truly than if his name alone were blazoned on its every page. Thus I have tried to speak of our knowledge of God. That knowledge, I have tried to show, is not a perception of the senses, but a vision of the soul ; not a deduction of the understanding, but a convic- tion of the reason. Not the astronomer or the phy- siologist speaks with authority here, but the saint. We gladly accept every illustration of the divine methods which physical science offers ; but the primal proof of divine being is within. We will- ingly modify our modes of speaking about God, and his ways in nature, in conformity with every new discovery of fact or law ; but we do not yield to physical science what that science never gave — the central idea of God. And the philosophy which does not accept the experience of the saintly soul, the intuitions of piety, and the inner facts of the re- ligious sentiment, does not cover the whole ground. It may prevail for a while, and do a good work in disabusing men's minds of superstitions ; but it will not keep a lasting place. On a theme so high, all words must be little more than suggestions. Not analysis, but living experi- ence, is the key. Enough if I have touched some spring in our common spiritual experience which may have opened to any, more clearly, the grounds of faith in that truth of truths without which life, though full of good, would yet be shorn of its finest glory, — the illumination of the divine presence. Enveloped in that presence, we move ; quickened by that, we live ; invigorated by that, we work ; em- THEISM 29 bosomed in that, we rest. " Ourselves from God we cannot free " — always so near to us that we are never lonely or unprotected ; never so close to us that we are stifled or hindered. As the light, the air, the electric forces, press closely round our bodies, and enter in to mingle with them, yet with no sense to us of constraint, but only of invigoration and freedom ; so God, the Spirit, closely enfolds and stirs within our soul, life of our life, spirit of our spirit, life and spirit of the universe. For as the light and air and electric forces, though enfolding and dwelling in us, come from far above us, and reach far beyond us ; so, He, the Infinite Spirit, while encompassing us, and dwelling in us, yet far transcends us. No human soul, if it lives, is altogether without Him ; no human soul is large enough to contain or fully express Him, for all are contained in Him. Have you sought after God, searching for Him through the vastness of visible space, or amid the perplexities of human existence, or by the analysis of the understanding, and has your mind come back baffled and disheartened ? Lo, in the snowflake or the spring flower at your feet He awaited you ; in every law of nature you were trusting Him ; in every noblest thought of your mind, in every sacred feeling of your heart, in every high ideal of your im- agination, in every pure enthusiasm for beauty and for goodness, in every sacrifice of visible to invisible, of outward comfort to inward principle ; in every simple doing of duty, in every familiar act and ser- vice of unselfish love, He was revealing himself. Not only in the twilight musing, but in the plain 30 THEISM daylight of daily work faithfully performed, He has been with you. In every victory of good over evil, you have met Him. In every just and holy man or woman who has touched your life to higher issues, you have seen Him. You have talked with Him in the way, and broken bread with Him at the table. Your words may fail, when you would speak of Him ; but your soul cannot fail to acknowledge Him. March, 1872. From The Radical. THE UNITY AND UNIVERSALITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS The old definition of Catholic truth was, " Quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus," — what has been believed in at all times, in all places, and by all men. It would be easy to catalogue the diversities of the religious conceptions, the moral practices of dif- ferent times, places, nations, and to emphasize the contradictions, until it might seem, as some indeed believe, that there is no truth attainable by man, — nothing but notions and opinions, fancies, errors, and superstitions, perpetually changing, and alike futile ; till it might seem, as many believe, that no- thing but a miraculous intervention from heaven could at last reveal the truth and the way, and bring any order out of this chaos. I do not believe either of these conclusions. And it is my undertaking, in this paper, to show a unity and universality of truth existing in spite of all these diversities and under them all ; to show the element of truth existing beneath all errors and superstitions. I take the errors and superstitions, not to refute, but to bear testimony to, the reality of the truth they have so poorly, yet so really, represented. These are the witnesses. Superstition declares an impulse in man to religion. Idolatry establishes the inborn im- pulse to worship. Polytheism reveals the native in- 32 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS stinct in man to conceive of mysterious power above man and nature. Necromancy involves a belief in immortality. These are the rude beginnings, the im- perfect, sometimes monstrous growths. But where there was all this smoke, there must have been some fire ; where there was all this manifestation, there was something seeking expression. That something was Religion ; man's native sense of somewhat within him and beyond him other than the visible ; the sense of the unseen and infinite and perfect haunt- ing him, now in rude and incoherent dreams, now in clearer vision ; but from which he could not free himself. He tried to name it, and he stammered. He tried to reach it, and he stumbled. But still it stirred within him, and would not let him alone. Still it shone before him, and beckoned him on. That, in spite of all unintelligible and absurd be- liefs, in spite of all burdensome and monstrous and cruel practices, in spite of all tyrannies of priestcraft and church authority, nearly all nations of men have remained religious, is to me a most striking proof of the reality and indestructibility of the religious element in man's nature. We must keep in mind the distinction between essence and form, between a ground-idea and the outward conception in which it shapes itself. The conception varies as the idea works itself out in greater or less clearness and force. The diversities, however great, need not disturb our faith in unities of idea. But the diversities have been much exaggerated. The unity is found again and again, not merely in the underlying idea, but in the very expression of the truth. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 33 The great religious ideas are these : God, Duty, Benevolence, Immortality. And these are universal ideas. They have been believed in all times, in all places, by all peoples. You cannot travel so wide but you will find temples, or the ruins of temples, altars, worships. You cannot read so far back into the history of men, but you will find men thinking of God, praying to Him, trying to do right, loving their kind, looking beyond death to follow the souls of their friends into an unseen world. The forms which these ideas have taken have differed, and do differ ; depending upon national character, upon race, climate, degree of civilization ; sometimes buried under superstitions, sometimes coming out in simple forms and clear thought ; clothed in one form of words in the imaginative and dreamy East, in another in the practical West. In all ages, too, and peoples, the more enlightened have held the popular faith under a different aspect from the ignorant. In all ages and peoples, there have been individual men who have been above the level of their time, superior to the limitations of their race in a degree, though never entirely free from them ; men of finer organization, wiser mind, more sensitive spiritual perception, keener moral instincts ; lofty and saintly souls, who have striven to draw brother men away from superstition to truth, from baseness to virtue ; to awaken them to a more living faith in God, duty, immortality. These men have been rev- erenced as prophets, have counted themselves sent of God. They have been looked upon as his spe- cial messengers. About them generally, after their death, the reverence of their fellows, the imagination 34 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS and wonder of men have gathered legends of mira- cles ; have attributed to them supernatural birth and supernatural powers ; have believed them incarna- tions of a descended God, or have raised them to demigods, and worshiped them. The first great religious idea is the idea of God. It is the idea of a mysterious Power superior to man, — creative, retributive, beneficent. With this idea the mind of man has always been haunted and pos- sessed ; and growing intelligence has not destroyed it, but only modified and elevated the forms of it. The idea is germinal in, and native to, the reason of man ; but his understanding, sentiment, and fancy have embodied it in many varying conceptions. We trace its presence and unfolding through the forms of Fetichism or Idolatry, Sabeism or Nature-wor- ship, Polytheism, Monotheism, to pure Theism, the conception of one universal infinite Spirit, whose immanent presence is the perpetual life of all things, whose infinite Personality includes and inspires all persons, while it transcends them; the "one God and Father of all, who is above all, through all, and in all/' Behind all idolatries and image worship there has always been a sense, more or less fully recognized, of an Invisible which they represented ; and the more intelligent have declared them to be only sym- bols, a condescension to the senses and imagination. Thus an English missionary relates that, standing with a venerable Brahman to witness the sacred images carried in pomp and cast into the Ganges, he UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 35 said : " Behold your gods ; made with hands ; thrown into a river." "What are they, sir?" replied the Brahman ; " only dolls. That is well enough for the ignorant, but not for the wise." And he went on to quote from the ancient Hindu Scripture : " The world lay in darkness, as asleep. Then He who exists for himself, the most High, the Almighty, manifested himself and dispelled the gloom. He whose nature is beyond our reach, whose being escapes our senses, who is invisible and eternal, — He, the all-pervading Spirit, whom the mind cannot grasp, even He shone forth." x In like manner, wherever Polytheism has pre- vailed, there has been a vague sense of unity accom- panying it and growing clearer with growing intelli- gence. One of the gods comes to be regarded as supreme, and the others to be but his ministers or angels. The Jehovah of the Jews appears at first to have been conceived of as not the only God, but the special god of their nation, superior to the gods of the other nations. Thus, even in Homer, we find a tendency to gather up into Zeus, as centre and source, all the functions of the other divinities ; 2 a tendency which afterwards developed into the faith expressed in the magnificent Hymn of Kleanthes. The Egyptians believed in a "first God; Being before all and alone; Fountain of all." A very ancient inscription upon the tomb of Mentuhotep speaks of "Turn, the one Being, the great God, existing of himself, Creator, Lord of all gods." 3 In 1 Laws of Mann, i. 5, 7. 2 Denis, Histoire des Theories et des Idees Morales, i. 7. 8 From the translation of Lepsius. 36 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS the " Rig Veda," the most ancient collection of Hindu Hymns, we read: "They call Him Indra, Mithra, Varuna, Agni ; — that which is One the wise call in divers manners." And again: "The poets make the beautiful-winged, though He is One, manifold by their words." : So the later " Bhagavad Gita" speaks of "the Supreme, Universal Spirit, the Eter- nal Person ; divine, before all gods, omnipresent ; Creator and Lord of all that exists ; God of gods, Lord of the Universe." 2 And the " Vishnu Purana " says : " The one only God, the Adorable, takes the designation of Brahma, Vishnu, or Siva, accordingly as He creates, preserves, or destroys. He is the Supreme, the giver of all good." 3 The Aztecs of Mexico, with their more than two hundred deities, recognized one supreme Creator and Lord, whom they addressed in their prayers as " the God by whom we live," " omnipresent, that knoweth all thoughts and giveth all gifts," "without whom man is as nothing," "invisible, incorporeal; one God, of utter perfection and purity." 4 So the ancient Peruvians had their " Creator and Sustainer of Life ; " the American Indians, their Great Spirit, " Master of Life;" the Scandinavians, their "All-father." In the Masdean, or Zoroastrian, belief, Ormuzd (Ahuramazda) is spoken of as " omniscient, omnipo- tent, and omnipresent ; formless, self-existent, and eternal ; pure and holy ; Lord over all creatures in 1 Rig Veda (b. c. 1500), i. 164, 46; and x. 14, 5. See Miiller, Chips, i. 29. 2 Bhagavad Gita, chapter x. 3 Wilson's translation, i. 41, 43. 4 Prescott, Conquest of Mexico, i. 57. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 37 the universe ; the Refuge of those who seek his aid." He is invoked as "the Creator, the glorious, majestic, greatest, best, most fair, mightiest, wisest, highest in holiness ; who created us, who keeps us." x And where the forms of polytheistic mythology occupied the popular mind, the intelligent and phi- losophic have always regarded these as but shapes of the fancy, and taught a pure doctrine of the unity and spirituality of God. Xenophanes, as Aristotle relates, casting his eyes upward to the heavens, declared the One his God. He condemned the prevalent mythologies and the notions of God in human figure, and severely blamed Hesiod and Homer for their scandalous tales about the gods. He taught that "there is one supreme God among beings divine and human. . . . He governs all things by power of reason." The Pythagoreans taught the unity of God, and compared Him to a circle whose centre is everywhere, whose circum- ference nowhere. " There are not different gods for different nations,'" wrote Plutarch. "As there is one and the same sun, moon, sky, earth, sea, for all men, though they call them by different names ; so the One Spirit which governs this universe, the Universal Providence, receives among different nations different names." 2 "There is but one God, who pervades all," writes Marcus Aurelius, the Roman emperor. 3 "In all this conflict of opinions," says Maximus Tyrius, "know that through all the 1 Avesta, Yanca, i. 1, 2. Bleeck's translation. Zoroaster was born b. c. 589. 2 Cited by Denis, ii. 224. 3 A. D. 121. Thoughts, vii. 9. 38 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS world sound one consenting law and idea, that there is one God, the King and Father of all, and many gods, the children of God. This both the Greek and the Barbarian teach." And again he says, "I do not blame the variety of representations : only let men understand that there is but one Divine nature ; let them love one and keep one in their thoughts." 1 Upon a temple at Delphi was the inscription EI, Thou art. And upon this Plutarch writes : "We say to God : Thou art ; giving Him thus his true name, the name which belongs alone to Him. For what truly is ? That which is eternal, which has never had beginning by birth, never will have end by death, that to which time brings no change. It would be wrong to say of Him who is, that He was or will be, for these words express changes and vicissitudes. But God is. He is, not after the fash- ion of things measured by time, but in an immovable and unchanging eternity. By a single Now He fills the Forever. For Deity is not many, but that which is must be one." 2 Again, after denying the fable of the birth and education of Zeus, Plutarch says : " There is.nothing before him ; he is the first and most ancient of be- ings, the author of all things ; he was from the begin- ning ; too great to owe his existence to any other than himself. From his sight is nothing hid. . . . Night and slumber never weigh upon that infinite eye, which alone looks upon the truth. By him we see, from him we have all which we possess. Giver of all good, ordainer of all which is and which hap- 1 Dissertations, 38. 2 On the WordYX, 17, 19, 20. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 39 pens, it is he who gives all and makes all. In him are the beginning, the end, the measure, and destiny of everything." 1 We are sometimes pointed to Buddhism as an in- stance of a religion without a God. That its primitive teaching was such I suppose must be admitted ; perhaps it was a reaction from the excessive devo- teeism or the corrupted worship of the Brahmans. But it was not long before the Buddha himself be- came an object of worship. And there is ample evidence that in our day the three hundred millions of Buddhists are not without a belief in God. In a Buddhist tract we read : " There appears in the law of Buddha only one Omnipotent Being. . . . He is a Supreme Being above all others ; and, although there are many gods, yet there is a Supreme who is God of the gods." 2 Hue relates a conversation with a Thibetan Lama, who said to him, " We must not confound religious truth with the superstitions which amuse the credulity of the ignorant. There is but one sole sovereign Being who has created all things. He is without beginning, and without end ; He is without body, He is a spiritual substance." 3 And Schlagintweit says, " In face of all these gods, the Lamas emphatically maintain monotheism to be the real character of Buddhism." And again he speaks of a chief Buddha, Adi Buddha, called " Supreme Buddha," "the Being without beginning or end," 1 Cited by Denis, ii. 225. Plutarch was born a. d. 50. 2 Upham's Sacred Books of Ceylon, iii. 13. In some of the tracts of this volume the existence of a Supreme Being is denied. Buddha died b. c. 548. 3 Journey through Tartary, Thibet, etc., i. 121, 122. 40 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS "the Supreme Intelligence, God above all." 1 So that evidently the statement, "that a third of the human race have lived and died without a belief in God," is altogether too strong. With the idea of God we find united the idea of providence, beneficence, and friendly care toward man. And from this, joined with a perception of a moral likeness between Him and man, sprang natu- rally in the heart and mind of men the conception of his fatherhood. This thought of God as our Fa- ther is often represented as the peculiar revelation of Jesus. But it was known and taught long before and far beyond Christianity. We find the name of Father familiarly given to the Supreme in India, Greece, and Rome. Thus we read in the "Rig Veda:" "May our Father, Heaven, be favorable to us. May that Eter- nal One protect us evermore. We have no other Friend, no other Father." "The Father of heaven, who is the Father of men." " Father of gods and of men," says Hesiod of Zeus. And " Father of gods and of men," echoes Homer; and again, "Zeus, most great and glorious Father." " Father omnipotent " is Virgil's phrase, and " the Father." In Horace we find, " Father and guardian of the human race ; " " the Parent who gov- erns the affairs of men and of gods ; " " the Father." Plutarch declares that " Zeus is by nature the Father of men ; and the best men he calls his sons." 2 " He, the glorious Parent, tries the good man and prepares him for himself," writes Seneca. 3 "God, of all 1 Buddhism in Thibet, page 108. 2 Apophthegmata. 3 De Providentia, i. 6. Seneca was born a. d. 3. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 41 things which are Father and Maker, more ancient than the sun ; whom no voice can express, no eye behold," says Maximus Tyrius. And Epictetus, " If what philosophers say of the kinship between God and men be true, . . . why should not a man call himself a citizen of the universe? why not a son of God ? . . . Shall not having God for our Maker, Fa- ther, and Guardian free us from griefs and alarms ? " And again, speaking of Heracles, he says, " He knew that no human being is an orphan, but that there is a Father who incessantly cares for all. For he had not merely heard it said that Zeus is the Fa- ther of mankind, but he esteemed and called him his own Father, and in thought of him performed all his deeds." 1 Philo, the Alexandrian Jew, says that " he who re- gards the whole universe as his country feels bound to seek the favor of its Father and Framer ; " 2 and again, " God, whose most fit name is Father ; " and "One Creator, one Father." 3 And in the Talmud we read : " Every nation has its special guardian angels ; Israel shall look only to Him. There is no mediator between those who are called his chil- dren and their Father which is in heaven." "As long as Israel is looking up to its Father which is in heaven it will live." " If we are called servants of God, we are also called his children." 4 In every synagogue in Judea and Galilee were recited at each service these sentences of prayer : " Be Thou mer- 1 Discourses, i. 9 ; iii. 24. 2 De Monarchia. Philo was born A. D. 27. 3 Confusion of Languages, 33. 4 London Quarterly Review, October, 1867. 42 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS ciful unto us, our Father, for we have sinned." " Most merciful Father, pardon us." " Bring us back, O our Father, to the keeping of thy law." And daily in the temple was spoken the prayer, " Bless us, O our Father, all even as one, with the light of thy countenance." 1 ii. The second great religious idea which I named is the Moral Idea ; the idea of Right, of Duty ; and the sense of the obligation of the Virtues. I call this religions ; I know it is often called " only moral.'" But if by moral be meant anything deeper than mere custom or habit or external good behav- ior ; if it go down to principles and laws felt to be of a creation and an obligation superior to human will, — then we are in the realm of the invisible, the eternal, in the realm of religion. Therefore I call righteousness an essential part of religion. To some men, who have little of devout sentiment, or who have speculative difficulties about belief in God, or in a God, morals or righteousness is the substance of their religion ; and, if it gives a sacred sanction and an immutable ground of nobleness to their lives, it is truly a religion. To the devout mind, the sen- timent and idea of right become identified with the will of God. Obedience to the law of our own being is obedience to his law ; his service is therefore perfect freedom, and finds its sacred sanction in like- ness to Him. We ought not to be surprised to find that the idea of right and wrong has been universal among 1 See Prideaux and Lightfoot. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 43 men. That is but saying that men have always been men ; have always had consciences, as they have al- ways had senses, affections, language, society. We ought not to be surprised that the virtues of justice, honesty, veracity, purity, have been inculcated and practiced under all forms of religion. Yet there are those who, on account of superficial diversities and differences of development, deny any universality in the moral ideas. They point, for instance, to the immoralities attributed to the gods in some of the polytheistic mythologies. But the wiser men in these nations disbelieved and denounced these fables. Thus we find Plato in his " Republic," at great length, blaming Hesiod and Homer for attrib- uting low morals to the gods, and declaring the falsity of such notions. But even among those who currently believed these things of the gods, the practice of them was not justified or approved among men. There was thought perhaps to be a different law for the Im- mortals, or only their own will. Just as, in Chris- tendom, God's mere will is thought to be for Him the only law of right. In Christian churches it is currently taught that He may justly do what in man would be monstrous cruelty. God is believed to spend eternity in burning alive those of his chil- dren who have disobeyed Him, or who have only not accepted his conditions of salvation ; or in subject- ing them to tortures of which burning alive would be a faint symbol. But the same act would not for a moment be justified, or be judged as other than monstrous cruelty, in a man. In the decadence of Rome, it became a fashion for the dissolute young 44 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS men to take the names of the several gods, and addict themselves to their special vices ; but, of course, in that there was no serious belief of any kind. And precisely in these periods of corruption we find the wiser and better men lamenting the prevalence of vices, inveighing keenly against them ; in the name of religion urging a pure morality, en- deavoring to awaken the sense of personal virtue, and working reforms in morals and manners. v But it is urged that practices condemned by the conscience of one time and religion have been approved or commanded by that of some others. Doubtless these diversities in the application of moral judgments have existed, and do exist, accord- ing as the moral sense has been more or less enlight- ened and cultivated. I am not declaring the absolute uniformity of the moral, or the religious, conceptions or practices of men ; only the virtual universality and essential unity of the idea. Doubtless the diversities exist. But they have been exaggerated. And the difference is often on the surface, in the form of the act, and not in its quality or motive. Thus human sacrifices, so prevalent in primitive worships, are held up as instances of sanctioned cruelty. So they would be for us ; and always they mark, of course, a low state of religious and moral perception. But they were never offered in a mo- tive of cruelty. A religious feeling overrode the natural sentiment of humanity ; that sentiment was sacrificed in what was erroneously deemed a higher feeling, as in the tale of Abraham offering his son. Moreover, under the practice of human sacrifices lay the true idea of offering to God that which was most UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 45 precious. Doubtless the young men who, among the Aztecs, were every year selected and prepared for the bloody rites of the god counted it a glory to be so consecrated, and went to the "teocalli " with something of the exalted sentiment with which a youth devotes himself to death in his country's defense. But the same religions which enjoined these bloody offerings to their gods enjoined among men the obligations of kindness and humanity. The Christian church proclaims daily the acceptable- ness to God of the great Human Sacrifice, pictures the body torn upon the cross, and dwells with ear- nest iteration upon the efficacy of the blood shed on Calvary, and its necessity to appease the wrath of God. But it inculcates at the same time on men pity, compassion, and justice. A sincere but mis- taken religious sentiment blinds it to the essential cruelty and injustice involved in God's acceptance of such a sacrifice as it depicts. With all the differences, then, in the culture of the moral sentiments, and in the application of moral judgments, we are justified in declaring the univer- sality of the moral idea. In no age or people has anything been approved because it was unjust, or that was seen at the same time to be unjust. More than this : we find, in widely different nations and times, the continual recurrence of the same moral injunctions, the inculcation of the same virtues. In the " Vishnu Purana," a Brahmanic scripture, we read : 1 — " The earth is upheld by the veracity of those who have subdued their passions, and, following 1 Translation of H, H. Wilson, vol. iii. 46 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS righteousness, are never contaminated with desire, covetousness, or wrath." " The Eternal makes not his abode in the heart of the man who covets an- other's goods, who injures any living creature, who utters harshness or untruth, who is proud in his iniquity, and whose thoughts are evil." " Kesava [a name of God] is most pleased with him who does good to others, who never utters calumny or falsehood, who never covets another's wife or another's goods, who does not smite or kill, who desires always the welfare of all creatures and of his own soul, whose pure heart takes no pleasure in the imperfections of love and hatred. The man who conforms to the duties enjoined in the Scripture is he who best worships Vishnu [God] ; there is no other way." "The duties incumbent alike on all classes are the support of one's own household, marriage for the sake of offspring, tenderness toward all crea- tures, patience, humility, truth, purity, freedom from envy, from repining, from avarice, from detrac- tion." " Know that man to be the true worshiper of Vishnu who, looking upon gold in secret, holds another's wealth but as grass, and directs all his thoughts to the Lord." "The Brahman must look upon the jewels of another as if they were but peb- bles." The five commandments of the Buddhist religion, which dates six centuries before the Christian era, and counts among its adherents more millions than any other church, are these : i. Thou shalt not kill. 2. Thou shalt not steal. 3. Thou shalt not commit UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 4? adultery, or any impurity. 4. Thou shalt not lie. 5. Thou shalt not intoxicate thyself with drink. 1 I need not occupy space with quotations of moral precepts from the ethical writings of the Greek and Roman philosophers. A single sentence of Aris- totle sums them up : "In all times men have praised honesty, moral purity, beneficence. In all times they have protested against murder, adultery, per- jury, and all kinds of vice. No one will dare main- tain that it is better to do injustice than to bear it." 2 So we find in Cicero, " The true law is everywhere spread abroad ; it is constant eternal. It calls us to duty by its commandments ; it turns us away from wrong-doing by its prohibitions. We can take no- thing from it, change nothing, abrogate nothing. Neither the Senate nor the people have the right to free us from it. It is not one thing at Rome, another at Athens ; one thing to-day, to-morrow an- other. But eternal and immutable, the same Law embraces all times and all nations. There is one Being alone who can teach it and impose it upon all ; that is, God." 3 This same religious sanction of right-doing we find in various writers, urged with the motive of likeness to God. "God is just," says Plato, "and there is nothing that resembles Him more than the just man." 4 " The temperate [virtuous] man is dear 1 Upham's Sacred Books of Ceylo?i. Sometimes five other com- mandments are added. 2 Topic VIII. x., cited by Boutteville, La Morale, page 542. So Plato : " He who commits injustice is ever more wretched than he who suffers it." Gorgias, Bonn's translation, i. 177. Plato was born B. c. 430. 3 Cited by Denis, Theories Morales, ii. 16. 4 Thecvtetus, Rohn, i. 411. 48 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS to God, for he is like Him." 1 . Zeno taught that "men ought to seek after perfection ; for God is perfect." 2 Epictetus says that he who would please and obey God must seek to be like Him. " He must be faithful as God is faithful ; free, beneficent, noble, as God is ; in all his words and actions behaving as an imitator of God." 3 " Love mankind ; follow God," wrote Marcus Aurelius. 4 There is a celebrated moral rule which is called the Golden Rule of Christianity. Confucius, some five centuries before the Christian era, was asked, "Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one's life ? " The master replied, " Is not reciprocity such a word ? What you. do not wish done to yourself, do not to others." 5 Thales, first of the Greek philosophers, taught : " That which thou blamest in another do not thyself to thy neigh- bor;" and Isocrates : "Thou wilt deserve to be honored if thou doest not thyself what thou blamest in others." 6 " Let no one treat his brother in a way he would himself dislike," is a Sabean maxim, pre- served by El Wardi. In the fourth chapter of the so-called "apocryphal" book of Tobit, 7 among many other excellent precepts, we read, " Do to no man what thou thyself hatest." In the Jewish Talmud, also, we find, " Do not to another what thou wouldst not he should do to thee ; this is the sum of the law," given as one of the teachings of the Rabbi 1 The Laws, Bohn, v. 140. 2 Cited by Boutteville, page 531. Zeno was born b. c. 300. 3 Discourses, ii. 14. 4 Thoughts, vii. 31. 5 Legge, Confucian Analects, xv. 22, 6 Cited by Boutteville, page 533. 7 Circa 175 B.C. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 49 Hillel, who died when Jesus, according to the com- mon reckoning, was ten years old. 1 It is not merely external rules, nor outward good conduct alone, that we find inculcated in these uni- versal morals. The wise and good in all times have looked within the heart for the motive and quality of right action. Confucius continually urges the "having the heart right." "I keep pure my thoughts," says a Parsee hymn. And throughout the Zoroastrian scripture "good thoughts" are always joined with "good words and good works." " Seek to converse in purity with your own pure mind and with God," says Epictetus. " The first and highest purity is that of the soul." And he warns his disciple that he should not even look upon the wife of another with an impure thought. 2 So Ovid: "It is not by locks and bars that a wo- man ought to be guarded, but by her own purity ; she who does not sin only because she is unable has really sinned ; her heart is adulterous." 3 And Juve- nal : " He who in the silence of his own thought plans a crime has upon him the guilt of the deed." 4 "The good man," says Cicero, "not only will not dare to do, he will not even think what he dares not proclaim." 5 " Keep thy divine part pure," writes Marcus Aurelius ; and again, " Look within ; within is the fountain of good." "That which is hidden within, — that is the life, that is the man." 6 So we shall not be surprised to find that not only 1 London Quarterly Review, October, 1867. 2 Discourses, ii. 18; iv. n. 3 Cited by Denis, ii. 124. 4 Satires xiii. v. 209. 5 De Officiis^ iii. 19. r ' Thoughts, iii. 12 ; viL 29 ; x. 38. 50 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS the conspicuous virtues are inculcated by the so- called " heathen " teachers ; the lowly and the pas- sive have their place and commendation. " Who- ever wishes to be happy," says Plato, " must attach himself to justice, and walk humbly and modestly in her steps. He who lets himself be puffed up with pride, devoured by ambitious desires, and thinks he has no need of master or guide, God abandons him to himself. He ends by destroying himself." 1 " Do what you know to be right without expecting any glory from it," is given as a saying of Demophilus, the Pythagorean ; and " Keep thy life hid," is said to have been one of the great maxims of the Epicu- reans. " Dear to all hearts is he whom lowliness exalts," is a Persian saying; 2 and another, "Make thyself dust to do anything well." " He who knows the light, and yet keeps the shade, will be the whole world's model," said Lao-tze ; and again, " He that humbles himself shall be preserved entire, — that is no vain utterance." " To attain God, the heart must be lowly," is a Hindu maxim. " Patience and resignation are the one road ; Buddha has declared no better path exists," says a Chinese scripture. It has even been objected that Buddhism unduly exalts the " passive virtues." "Who is the great man? He who is strongest in the exercise of patience, he who patiently endures injury," is a saying attributed to the Buddha himself. In the Brahmanic " Vishnu Purana," " Tenderness toward all, patience, humil- ity," are named among the "duties incumbent on all." 1 Cited by Boutteville. 2 This and the following sentences are from Conway's Sacred An- UXITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 5 I Humility is said to have had only an ignoble meaning with the Romans, but Epictetus, 1 who may have learned the lesson as a slave, recommends to his disciple to " train and perfect his will, and ren- der it noble, free, faithful, humble." And elsewhere he says, " Such will I show myself to you, faithful, modest, noble, tranquil, since Olympian Zeus him- self does not haughtily lift his brow." In his im- perial palace Marcus Aurelius could say to himself, " Take care that thou be not made into a Caesar. . . . Keep thyself simple, good, pure, . . . kind, affec- tionate." Again, " Make thyself all simplicity." 2 He everywhere praises modesty, and commends the " sweetness " and " patience " of Antoninus. " The more exalted we are, the more lowly we ought to walk," said Cicero. 3 In the Talmud we read, " He who humbles himself will be lifted up ; he who ex- alts himself will be humbled." " He who offers humility before God and man shall be rewarded as if he had offered all the sacrifice in the world." And again, " He who gives alms in secret is greater than Moses." 4 So Seneca wrote, " That which is given to infirmity, to indigence, to honest poverty, ought to be given in secret, and known only to those who are benefited by it. . . . Such is the law of benefits between men, — the one ought to forget at once what he has given, the other never to forget what he has received." 5 And Plutarch, "The virtuous man 1 Discourses, i. 4 ; ii. 8. 2 Thoughts, vi. 30 ; iv. 28. 3 De Officiis, i. 26. Cicero was born B. c. 106. 4 London Quarterly Review, October, 186- . 5 De Beneficiis. 52 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS buries in silence his good deeds." " All thinking beings," says Marcus Aurelius, " have been made one for the other ; they owe patience one toward another." " 'T is against nature to cherish ill-will to him who is your neighbor, your kindred, your brother." in. And so we strike upon the sentiment of benevo- lence, the virtue of disinterestedness, the idea of Brotherhood. We shall find the inculcations of Love as widely spread as those of Justice. While inhumanity has always existed in the world, and selfishness and cruelty are certainly not yet outgrown, in all times there have been protests against them from the lips of the good, from the better heart of man. Always there have been kindness, forgive- ness, charity, and the inculcation of them. Those sweet waters have flowed ever from the perennial springs in the heart of man and of God, to refresh even the most desert places. " He who injures any living creature does it to God," says the " Vishnu Purana ; " " He is most pleased with the man who does good to others ; who bears ill-will to none." " The Brahman must ever seek to promote the good of others, for his best riches are benevolence to all." " He who feeds himself, and neglects the poor and the friendless stranger needing hospital- ity, goes to hell." " He who eats his food without bestowing any upon his guest eats iniquity." The Pythagoreans taught that the old ought to treat the young with benevolence ; and men to be kind to children, remembering that childhood is especially UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 53 dear to God. We must bear one another's burdens, they said, but not lay burdens on any. Justice, they said, is the beginning of political equality, but brotherly love is the completion of it. If disputes or anger arose between any of his disciples, their master taught them to be reconciled before the sun should go down. 1 Iamblichus tells us that " Pytha- goras taught the love of all towards all." 2 In Confucius we find these notable words : " My doc- trine is simple and easy to understand. It consists only in having the heart right, and in loving one's neighbor as one's self." 3 And when one asked him about benevolence, he answered, " It is love to all men." 4 "We are by nature inclined to love men," says Cicero. 5 " Take away love and benevolence, and you take away all the joy of life." 6 " Kindness, justice, liberality, are more in accordance with our nature than the love of pleasure, of riches, or even of life." And he quotes with approval the maxim of the Stoics, that " men are born for the sake of men, that they may naturally benefit one another." 7 " What good man, what religious man, will look upon the sufferings of others as foreign to him ? " writes Juvenal. 8 " Is there a better sentiment than compassion ? " says Ouintilian, " or one whose source 1 Denis, i. 15, 16. 2 Boutteville, page 381, note. 3 Pauthier's translation, page 130. He declares his version to be exact. Legge renders more verbosely and prosaically : "To be true to the principles of our nature, and the benevolent exercise of them to others." The two Chinese words, he says, mean literally centre- heai't and as-heart. Analects, iv. 15. 4 Analects, xii. 22. 5 De Legibns, i. 15. 6 De Amicitia. 7 De Officii s, iii. 5 ; i. 7. 8 Satires, xv. 131. 54 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS lies more in the most venerable and sacred princi- ples of nature ? God, the author of all things here below, wills that we should help one another. . . . If I have given bread to a stranger in the name of that universal brotherhood which binds together all men under the common Father of nature, would it not be a good deed to have saved a soul ready to perish ? " 1 Menander, the Greek dramatist, has these beautiful sentences : " To live is not to live for one's self alone. Let us help one another. Let us learn to have pity upon the sorrows of others, that they may with cause have compassion upon ours. Help the stranger, for thou mayest one day be a stranger. Let the rich man remember the poor ; for the poor belong to God." 2 "Will you not bear with your brother," cries Epictetus, " who has God for his Father, his son as thou art, of the same high descent ? " 3 Notice this religious motive urged for brotherly love. And again, " Will you not remember over whom you bear rule, that they are by nature your kindred, your brothers, offspring of God?" — speaking of slaves. Epictetus had himself been a» slave. The poet Terence, who had known the same hard experience, had plucked from it the same flower of sympathy for his fellows. His sentence, " I am a man, no- thing human can I count foreign to me," has become almost a proverb. Menander, before him, had said in almost the same words, "No man is a stranger to me, provided he be a good man. For we have all the one and the same nature, and it is virtue alone 1 Cited by Denis, ii. 156. 2 Menander was born B. c. 342. 3 Discourses, i. 13. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 55 which makes the true kindred." So Marcus Aure- lius : " The good man remembers that every rational being is his kinsman, and that to care for all men is according to man's nature." " We are made for cooperation ; to act against one another, then, is contrary to nature." " We are created especially for the sake of one another." "It is the proper work of a man to be benevolent to his kind." 1 The doctrine of the Brotherhood of Man has been declared to be found in Christian teaching alone. It is difficult to find it in the Gospels ; the single sentence usually quoted having reference only to the small company of Christian disciples. Paul states it in one passage : " God has made of one blood all the nations of men." But the idea was already familiar to the heart and mind of good men. Denis, in his learned and interesting work on the " Moral Theories and Ideas of Antiquity," from which many of my quotations have been gathered, says that "Diodorus proposed to himself to write a universal history on the ground that men everywhere belong to one family." Plutarch speaks of "that admirable republic imagined by Zeno, the founder of the Stoic sect," which shows us "that all men are our countrymen and fellow-citizens ; " and he adds that " Zeno left this description as the dream or imagination of equity and of a philosophic repub- lic ; but what he taught, Alexander realized. Con- ceiving that he was sent of God to unite all to- gether, he formed of a hundred diverse nations one single universal body ; mingling, as it were, in one cup of friendship the customs and laws of all." 2 1 Thoughts, iii. 4 ; ii. 1 ; viii. 56, 26. 2 De Fort. Alexand. $6 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS "The love of mankind," — " caritas generis hu- mani" — is Cicero's beautiful phrase; 1 and the ex- pression "the fellowship of the human race" often recurs in his writings. 2 " A man must believe him- self born not for himself, but for the whole world," writes Lucan ; and he foretells the time when " the human race will lay aside its weapons, and all nations will love each other." 3 " We are members of one great body ; nature has made us kindred . . . and implanted in us mutual love," — these are the words of Seneca. 4 But this is not all. We find among the writers of "heathen " antiquity, not merely the inculcation of kindness, compassion, benevolence ; these find their highest expression in the doctrine of forgive- ness of enemies. No doubt we find the lex talionis ; the Greek ^Eschylus, with his " evil for evil," matches the Hebrew " eye for eye." But it was also a Hebrew proverb, " If thine enemy hunger, give him bread to eat ; if he thirst, give him water to drink." 5 The Pythagoreans taught that if, in the state, the law recompensed evil with evil, pri- vate men ought, on the contrary, to injure none, but to support patiently wrongs and insults. 6 Pit- tacus, one of the seven wise men of Greece, taught that clemency is preferable to vengeance, which brings remorse; that "it is better to pardon than to punish;" and said, "Do not speak ill of your friends ; no, not even of your enemies." So Cleo- bulus said that " we ought to be kind to our friends, 1 De Finibus. 2 De Officiis, i. 44 ; iii. 6. De Amicitia. 3 Pharsalia, ii. ; v. 38. 4 Epistolce, 95. 5 Proverbs xxv. 21. 6 Denis, i. 14. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS $y to make them more than our friends ; and to our enemies, to make them our friends." Confucius thought that we " ought to repay injuries with jus- tice, and unkindness with kindness ; " * and his coun- tryman Lao-tze had said, " The wise man avenges his injuries by benefits." 2 Plato reports Socrates as saying, " Neither ought one who is injured to return the injury, as the multitude think, since it is on no account right to do injustice. It is not right, therefore, to return an injury, or to do evil to any man, however we may have suffered from him." 3 In later times Cicero teaches a similar les- son. " Let us not listen," he says, " to those who think we ought to be angry with our enemies, and believe this to be great and manly. Nothing is more praiseworthy, nothing more marks a great and noble soul, than clemency and the readiness to for- give." 4 And Valerius Maximus, the Roman histo- rian, says still better : " It is more beautiful to over- come injury by the power of kindness than oppose to it obstinacy and hatred." 5 In Seneca and Epic- tetus, the like sentiments are found. Marcus Au- relius compares the wise and humane soul to a spring of pure and sweet water, which, though the passer-by may curse it, continues to offer him a draught to assuage his thirst ; and, even if he cast into it mire and filth, hastens to reject it, and flows on pure and undisturbed. 6 This recalls the equally beautiful image in the Oriental scripture of the sandal-tree, 1 Analects, xxv. 36. 2 Tao-te-king (translation of Stan. Julien), ii. 73. 3 Crito y Bonn, i. 38. 4 De Officiis, i. 25. 5 iv. 2. 6 Thoughts, viii. 51. 58 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS which, in the moment when it falls before the wood- man's stroke, gives its fragrance to the axe which smites it with death. I cannot better close this part of my subject than by quoting that fine passage from Epictetus where he draws the picture of the true " Cynic," as he calls him, as men now say the true " Christian." " The Cynic must fence himself with virtuous shame. . . . He must purify his soul. . . . He must know that he is a messenger sent from Zeus to men to teach them of good and evil. . . . He must tell them the truth, without fear. . . . He must consult the Di- vinity, and attempt nothing without God. . . . He will needs be smitten, yet he must love those who smite him, as being the father, the brother, of all. . . . When he rebukes, he will do it as a father, as a brother, as the minister of the Father of all. . . . He must have such patience as to seem insensible and like a stone to the vulgar. . . . Instead of arms and guards, conscience will be his strength. For he knows that he has watched and toiled for man- kind, that he has slept pure and waked purer, and that he has regulated all his thoughts as the minis- ter of Heaven." x I am tempted to add as a companion picture that which Marcus Aurelius draws of the good man. " He is as a priest and minister of the gods ; devoted to that divinity which hath its dwelling within him ; by virtue of which the man is uncontaminable by any pleasure, invulnerable to every grief, inviolable to every injury, insensible to all malice; a fighter in the noblest fight, dyed deep with justice, accept- 1 Discourses, ii. zz. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 59 ing with all his soul that which the Providence of the Universe appoints him. He remembers also that every rational being is his kinsman, and that to care for all men is in accordance with the nature of man." 1 IV. The last great Religious Idea which I named is that of Immortality, or the continued life of the soul after the body's death. It may surprise those who have been brought up in a different view, but I believe it to be the simple fact, that no truth of religion has been more uni- versal than this. In all ages of which any history has come to us, in nearly all nations of which we have any trustworthy account, we find this faith ; not a hope merely, not "one guess among many," but a confidence, a practical assurance, a faith to live by and to die by. Hardly a people so savage but some traces of it are discoverable ; none so civilized that they have outgrown it ; an essential element in all religions. Superstitions and foolish fancies about it in plenty, no doubt ; but revealed through them all the central idea, the inner belief. From the wisest and best in different ages and nations the clearest statements of faith in it. No doubt, rude nations have had rude conceptions of it ; no doubt, as nations grew more advanced the old mythologies about it lost their hold, and were dis- carded even with ridicule as unworthy the belief of thinking men ; and some men with the going of the fables lost their faith also in the idea. But in those 1 Tkoztgkts, iii. 4. 60 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS very times some of the wisest and best men sought to rescue the faith and establish it on a deeper basis. The idea survived the form which it had cast off. Caesar tells us of the ancient Gauls, that, " to arouse their courage, by taking away the fear of death, the Druids preach that souls do not die." 2 And Pomponius Mela says that they believe " that souls are eternal, and that there is another life." 2 And Valerius Maximus confirms the statement : " They are persuaded that the souls of men are immortal." 3 In later times, Spanish conquerors go to Mexico and Peru, and find the faith in immortality, as in God, already there. 4 Roman Catholic missionaries visit India, China, Thibet, and find it there; go among the North American Indians, and find it there. Dr. Livingstone, the English missionary, penetrates into the interior of Africa, and brings home this report : " There is no necessity for begin- ning to tell even the most degraded of these people of the existence of God, or of a future state, these facts being universally admitted. . . . On question- ing intelligent men among the Bakwains as to their former knowledge of good and evil, of God, and of a future state, they have scouted the idea of their ever having been without a tolerably clear concep- tion on all these subjects. . . . They fully believe in the soul's continued existence apart from the body, and visit the graves of relatives, making offer- 1 De Bello Gallico, vi. 14. 2 De Situ Orbis, \\. 2. 3 ii. I, 10. 4 Frescott, Conquest of Mexico, i. 62, 89. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 6 1 ings." 1 There are travelers, indeed, who report tribes that have belief neither in immortality nor in God. If it be so, we must regard these as excep- tional instances, where the native human faiths are yet undeveloped. The Jewish Scriptures of the Old Testament con- tain only faint intimations of a future life. This is the more remarkable since the belief was so strongly held in Egypt at and before the time of Moses. Perhaps the beliefs of their oppressors were hateful to them. Be this as it may, we find the immortality of the soul clearly taught in the " apocryphal " books of Alexandrian-Jewish origin. It seems also to have been brought back by the Jews from their contact with the Persians in the Babylonian captivity. Certainly before the advent of Christianity it was the common belief of the nation, except among the sect of Sadducees. At least the doctrine of the "resurrection from the dead" was so. Probably the oldest existing record of man's faith in a future life is the ancient Egyptian " Book of the Dead," or " Funeral Ritual." Its chapters are found inscribed on mummy cases, or written upon rolls of papyrus within them. It is believed to date as far back as two thousand years before the Christian era. It might well be called the Book of Life, for it is full of an intense vitality; and this vivid sense of life shines through all that is obscure, strange, and ex- travagant in its details. It recounts the experiences of the human soul after death ; its passage in the mystic boat through the land of darkness to the blessed fields ; its trial in the " Hall of the Two 1 Missionary Travels +n South Africa, pages 176, 686. 62 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS Truths " (or the " twofold judgment ") before Thoth, the Lord of Truth, and the forty-two judges, to each of whom it declares its innocence of the offense he specially sits to condemn ; the placing its heart in the balance against an image of Righteousness ; the declaration of its innocence ; its passage through the initiatory trials to the Blessed Land and the presence of the god Osiris, its Father, in the eternal " dwelling-place of the prepared spirit." I quote some passages from this remarkable book. " The osiris [that is, the soul, taking the name of its father god] lives after he dies. Every god rejoices with life ; the osiris rejoices with life as they re- joice. Let the osiris go; he passes from the gate, he sees his father, Osiris ; he makes a way in the darkness to his father ; he is his beloved ; he has come to see his father ; he has pierced the heart of Set [the Evil Spirit] to do the things of his father Osiris ; he is the son beloved of his father. He has come a prepared spirit. . . . He moves as the never-resting gods in the heavens. . . . The osiris says, ' Hail Creator, self-created, do not turn me away, I am one of thy types on earth. ... I join myself with the noble spirits of the Wise in Hades.' . . . ' O ye lords of truth, I have brought you truth ; I have not privily done evil against any man ; I have not been idle ; I have not made any to weep ; I have not murdered ; I have not defrauded ; I have not committed adultery; I am pure, I am pure.' . . . Let the osiris go ; he is without sin, with- out crime ; he lives upon truth ; he has made his de- light in doing what men say and the gods wish ; he has given food to the hungry, drink to the thirsty, UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 63 clothes to the naked ; his mouth is pure, his hands are pure. . . . His heart goes to its place in the balance complete. . . . The Father of the spirit has examined and proved him. He has found that the departed fought on earth the battle of the good gods, as his Father the Lord of the invisible world had commanded him. . . . O God, the protector of him who has brought his cry to thee, he is thine, let him have no harm ; let him be as one of thy flying servants. Thou art he, he is thou. Make it well with him in the world of spirits." 1 In the Hindu Vedas we find also the faith in im- mortality. Yama, the god of the dead, " waited, en- throned in immortal light, to welcome the good into his kingdom of joy." There were "the homes he had gone to prepare for them," " where the One Be- ing dwells beyond the stars." 2 " Where there is eternal light, in that immortal, imperishable world place me," sings a Vedic burial hymn. " Where the secret place of heaven is, . . . where life is free, . . . where joy and pleasure abide, where the de- sires of our desire are attained, there make me im- mortal." 3 " Let him depart," says another, " to the heroes who have laid down their lives for others, — to those who have bestowed their gifts on the poor." And in the later Brahmanic scripture, the " Vishnu Purana," we read, "He who speaks wisely, moder- ately, kindly, goes [after death] to those worlds which 1 See Birch's translation of the " Book of the Dead," in Bunsen's Egypt's Place, etc., vol. v. 2 Rig Veda, x. See S. Johnson's Oriental Religions, " India," page 128. 3 Rig Veda, ix. 113, 7, cited in M. Miiller's Chips, i. 46. 64 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS are the inexhaustible sources of happiness. He who is intelligent, modest, devout, who reverences wis- dom and respects his superiors and the aged, goes to the highest heaven." " He who feeds himself, and neglects the poor and friendless stranger, goes to hell." 2 So in the " Bhagavad Gita : " " There is another invisible, eternal existence superior to this visible one, which does not perish when all things perish. Those who attain this never return. This is my supreme abode." 2 Buddhism teaches the same doctrine. " There is undoubtedly a life after this," says a Buddhist tract, " in which the virtuous may expect the reward of their good deeds. . . . Wicked men, on the con- trary, are after death born into hell, as animals. If they have done any good deed in their lifetime, they are after a long time released from punishment, and born into the world again as men. If they abstain from evil, and do good, they may reach the state of felicity, a place full of joy and delight. Judgment takes place immediately after death." 3 Beyond all the heavens, into which in turn the good are born in their ascending course, Buddhism (as well as Brahmanism) presents a state which is the object of all devout aspiration, — the final re- ward of the highest devotion and virtue. It is called Nirvana. Some writers have insisted that it means annihilation. But others, equally learned, interpret it, with far more probability as it appears to me, to be merely the end of the soul's transmigrations, the 1 Wilson's translation, iii. 121, 144. 2 Thompson's translation, page 60. 8 Upham's Sacred Books of Ceyloti, iii. 158. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 6$ cessation of the re-births into the pain and trouble of this world ; not annihilation, but perfect rest, ab- solute peace. 1 The religion of Zoroaster taught to the Persians the same great truth. It promised to all who should faithfully keep the law of God, in purity of thought, speech, and act, " when body and soul have sepa- rated, the attainment of paradise in the next world ; " while the disobedient " after death will have no part in paradise, but will occupy the place of darkness destined for the wicked." 2 In Greece, where there were no sacred books, no "holy scriptures" as such, but where the poets and the philosophers were the religious teachers of the people, we find no less the doctrine, and the popular belief, of Immortality. This popular belief, founded on the pictures which the poets' fancy had painted, is familiar to all. Hades, the world of spirits ; the Judges, Minos, ^Eacus, and Rhadamanthus ; Tarta- rus, the abode of darkness and punishment ; the Elysian fields, blooming with asphodel, radiant with perpetual sunshine, where parted friends meet again, "where life is ever sweet, and sorrow is not, nor winter, nor any rain or storm." Sophocles puts into the mouth of the dying Antigone the strongly cher- ished hope that she should be welcomed by her father, her mother, her brother, in that other world. 3 In Pindar we read, " An honorable and virtuous man 1 See S. Johnson's Oriental Religions, page 619 ; and Midler's Introduction to his translation of the Dhammapada. 2 Avesta : Spiegel, i. 171 ; cited by Alger, Doctrine of Future Life, page 136. 3 Antigone, 897. 66 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS may rest assured as to his future fate. The souls of the lawless departing this life suffer punishment. But the good lead a life without a tear, among those honored by the gods for having always delighted in virtue." 1 One of the golden verses of Pythagoras is this : " When thou shalt have laid aside thy body, thou shalt rise freed from mortality, and become a god of the kindly skies;" as we should say, "an angel." "Those who have lived in justice and piety," says Plutarch, " fear nothing after death. They look for a divine felicity. As they who run a race are not crowned till they have conquered, so good men believe that the reward of virtue is not given them till after death. Eager to flee away from the body and from the world to a glorious and blessed abode, they free their thoughts as much as in them lies from the things that perish." And again : " Not by lamentations and mournful chants ought we to celebrate the funeral of the good man, but by hymns ; for, in ceasing to be numbered with mortals, he enters upon the heritage of a diviner life." 2 For the thoughts of Plato upon this question we turn of course to his famed book, " Phaedon." Under the form of a report of the conversation of Socrates with his disciples just before his death, he gives his Master's ideas, or his own, upon the immortality and future state of the soul, with the arguments by which the conclusions are reached. These arguments, long, curious, and elaborate, can have little weight with us ; but the conclusions are definite and plain. 1 Second Olympic, cited by Alger. 2 Cited by Denis, ii. 225, 263. UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 67 As a thoughtful and conservative writer has well said, "The reasoning of Socrates in favor of im- mortality is far from clear, but not so his faith in immortality itself." 1 We find accordingly such sentences as these : — "Can the soul which is invisible, and which goes to a place like itself excellent, pure, invisible, to the presence of a good and wise God (whither, if God will, my soul almost must shortly go), — can this soul of ours, being of such a nature, when separated from the body be immediately dispersed and destroyed, as the many assert ? Far from it." "When, there- fore, death approaches a man, the mortal part of him, as it appears, dies ; but the immortal part departs safe and incorruptible, having withdrawn itself from death." "The soul, therefore, is most certainly im- mortal and imperishable, and our souls really exist in the world of spirits." "Those who shall have sufficiently purified themselves by philosophy [reli- gion] shall live without their bodies, received into more beautiful mansions." After a long and minute description of the circumstances and scenery of the future state, he adds: "To affirm positively that these things are exactly as I have described them does not become a man of sense ; that, however, either this, or something of the kind, takes place with respect to our souls and their habitations, this appears to me to be most fitting to be believed, since the soul is evidently immortal." " For the sake of these things we should use every endeavor to acquire virtue and wisdom in this life ; for the reward is noble and the hope is great." "A man ought, then, 1 Rev. Ichabod Nichols. D. Q., Horns with Evangelists, page 90. 68 UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS to have confidence about his soul, if during this life he has made it beautiful with temperance, justice, fortitude, freedom, and truth ; he waits for his en- trance into the world of spirits as one who is ready to depart when destiny calls." " I shall not remain, I shall depart. Do not say, then, that Socrates is buried ; say that you bury my body." Cicero tells us that the Stoics believed in a con- tinued life after death, but not in an endless immor- tality. His own faith has been thought to have been variable, or at least his expression of it ; though I think that with him, as with Plato, the "if" is often of argumentation and not of doubt ; and, with Lecky, I find in his writings " a firm and constant reference to the immortality of the soul." " As an eternal God," he says, " moves the mortal world, so an immortal soul moves our frail body." 2 And, again, " The origin of souls cannot be found upon this earth, for there is nothing earthly in them. They have faculties which claim to be called divine, and which can never be shown to have come to man from any source but God. That nature in us which thinks, which knows, which lives, is celestial, and for that reason necessarily eternal. God himself can be represented only as a free Spirit, separate from matter, seeing all things, and moving all things, Himself ceaselessly working. Of this kind, from this nature, is the human soul." " Although you do not see the soul of man, as you do not see God ; yet, as from his works you acknowledge Him, so from memory, from invention, from all the beauty of virtue, do thou acknowledge the divine nature of the 1 Somnium Scipionis, UNITY OF THE RELIGIOUS IDEAS 69 soul. It cannot be destroyed." 1 He represents the aged Cato as exclaiming, " O glorious day when I shall remove from this confused crowd to join the divine assembly of souls. For I shall go to meet not only those great men of whom I have spoken, but my own son Cato, for whom I have performed the funeral rites, which he should rather have rendered to me. His spirit has never deserted me; but de- parted, looking back upon me, to that place whither he knew that I should soon come. If I have borne his loss with courage, it is not that my heart was unfeeling ; but I have consoled myself with the thought that our separation would not be for long." 2 With these words of undying affection and faith, I bring my quotations to a close. How beautifully sound these consenting voices from East to West, from century to century, utter- ing the great Beliefs of the human race. Into what a " large place " they summon us out of all narrow limits of sect and church, even beyond Christianity itself, into that great and universal Church of the race, whose unity is the unity of the spirit, whose fellowship is the brotherhood of great faiths, sacred principles, and spiritual ideas. One Truth, one Right, one Love, one immortal Faith ; the Reason, the Conscience, the Heart of man, in all times and under all skies, essentially identical ; and over all one God and Father of all, giving to all his inspira- tion and his revelations as they are able to receive ! The passages which I have gathered into this paper are but a scanty gleaning from a broad and rich field. Of course, a good deal of a less interesting, 1 Tusc. Qincst. i. - Cato Major, 7