I R Z 4- CM S 3fe LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. if/ap. ©npgrigljt l?c. Shelf &A.& UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. / Mind-Healing Condensed: INSTRUCTION BOOK AND FORMULA. By Db. A. J. SWARTS, President of Spiritual Science University. This Book is a Succinct and Logical Statement of the Mind- Healing Science from the Standpoint of Intuition and Keason. CHICAGO : Published by the Author, 1443 Michigan Ave. Revised and Re-Issued, 9> Entered according to Act of Congress in the years 1887 and 1889, by A. J. SWARTS, ( in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. PREFACE. THIS condensed statement of Metaphysical Sci- ence, with a Formula for Silent Healing, is issued in response to many calls throughout the land. Believing that Reform demands a concise and comprehensible statement of this Science, and that an intelligent Formula is needed as a guide to the in- terested, we issue this summary of the Science in full confidence that its principles will be concurred in by all who have received the true understanding. While the Spiritual Science University claims im- portant discoveries, and successful methods of its own, it is in accord with the fundamental teachings of the most prominent authors of Mental Science or Metaphysics. The following rules can be successfully used by any physician, by Mental and Magnetic Healers, or by the afflicted for self-cure, provided that they are able to accept the scientific statement of Being, as held by the leading writers in this exacting Science which refuses to be classed with any other system of cure. If the reader would know the ethics and claims of this Science in order to decide whether he may attempt its demonstration in the cure of dis- ease, we will first state the essential doctrines of the system, and then let the application, or Formula for cure, immediately follow the foundation on which w T e profess to stand, as Mental or Spiritual Scien- tists. This Text Book is a true exposition of the Science variously called Mental or Mind Cure, Metaphysics, Christian Science, Mind-Healing, or Spiritual Sci- ence. It has been earnestly desired that some one might condense the scope of authors early in the Science to a succinct statement. This work pro- fesses to do this, and to establish through logical reasoning and by mathematical exactness, the Truth or the value of the best discoveries. The author is willing to allow the candid, unprejudiced student of the Metaphysical system, to say, after a careful reading, whether it accords with the leading claims of the Science, and to point out any material varia- tions from the first authorities in the system. Its aim is to harmonize, to unify, to establish and to defend all who have espoused the Cause, rather than to discriminate or give precedence to any author. It is not meant that this work consists of quotations, nor of borrowed sentences from anyone, for such is not the case. As a statement of the Science and as a Formula or guide in healing, it is designed chiefly for students, teachers and healers, and to such it is offered in the hope that it may prove a friend in the time of need. The Author. MIND-HEALING CONDENSED. THE uni instructed mind does not readily accept the ethics of this Science as Truth, hence it is generally necessary for those who are willing to enter this useful field in reform, to receive from a good teacher of the Science a course of lessons. After having read standard works, and taken a course of instruction, those truly interested can and will arrive at a practical understanding of the sys- tem. If the reader should not be able to accept our statements, we still have the satisfaction of know- ing that the application of this system has cured multitudes of helpless worthy people, and that to-day it is doing more to rid humanity of disease than all the drugs on earth can do. We have the further satisfaction of knowing that it is accepted and sup- ported by the best thinkers, by the educated and the refined people of the world, and knowing that God or Truth honors this Science, we will now epitomize its DOCTRINES OR ETHICS. Christian or Spiritual Science holds that God is in no sense a visible, formulated personality; that God is not and cannot be local, nor be an expression ever to be seen, or comprehended. It declares that God is the Supreme and Universal Good; Omnipresent, Invisible, Unchangeable; to be understood, not as anthropomorphic, not assuming any mortal function or shape. It claims that the essence or Being of Deity is the Sea of Invisible Spirit, as Omnipresent or all-extended as Nature entire or the Universe itself. It is neither Agnosticism nor Pantheism, for, while it denies that God can be visible, it certainly does not hold that visible things are God. Our Science holds that this universal Sea of Spirit is essential Substance or Intelligence, that it is the cause or Source of all visible things, hence is saved from the unscientific assertion that visible objects are "nothing." Spirit, the universal and essential Substance, pro- jects itself as thoughts or ideas, even as worlds and visible objects. All visible things derive existence from this great Sea of Deity; they all exist in it and it pervades them all, or, as the Bible has it, is the " All in All." No consideration is independent of Spirit, nor can anything possess externeity, outness, or even think where it is not, for there is no separate Life. No absolute entity belongs to man as a spirit, a life, a mind or a soul. The only absolute or Life in the universe, is the Infinite Spirit, the fathomless wholes the unknowable, or God. Neither so-called u matter, 1 ' flesh, blood, bones, nor visibility, constitute God or Spiritual Man in Science, for God and Spiritual Man are only inter- changeable terms for Being, and one is as real, as immortal and as extended as the other ; and strictly, there is no "other," in the sense of separate entity, because all is One. Visible or sense objects were first the ideas or thoughts of Creative Intelligence, and as ideas they are real and eternal. These millions of varying ideas could only come out to existence, i. e. to phys- ical sight, by reflected phenomena, for everything visible is phenomenal. Writers and teachers in our Science have not noted sufficiently the distinction between Existence and Being, but like theology and common thought have treated these as one. Being is the real, and always applies to the invisible, either to the invisible universal Spirit as God, or to ideas, thoughts, etc. Existence should be applied to phys- ical or visible objects, hence it is proper to think of ideas as being, and of their essence as for ever invisible yet immortal or eternal in idea. When to these ideas or conceptions Nature gives visible or reflected expression, then it is proper to refer to such as Existence, or to say that they exist. The Latin meaning of the word exist, is to emerge, to appear. It is from ex, meaning from or out of, and sistere which means to stand ; hence to stand out or become visible means to exist. This certainly cannot apply to God, nor can it apply to Immortal Man, but it does apply to mortal body, the earthly, the evolved or manifested man. Those who define immortality to mean existence or visible expression, have not come up to Spiritual Science where true conceptions of the real, of immortality or being are found. Existence is the transitory 5 temporal state, while being is entity, even eternal and immortal. Re-birth, or reincarnation, is the only method by which personal existence can be claimed as our immortality. We may, if we choose, take again a body of flesh, and have another, even many earth experiences. The Theosophical claims for reincarnation, are biblical, scientific, and the establishing conceptions of ripest thought. Many re-births are occurring in the present period. Once in the understanding of the Science of Life, you will have solved the problem and will know that Immortal Invisible Man is God. Do not confound our conception of God in Science with the theolog- ical belief of God as consisting of form and visible expression like the existing temporal man, for we turn from such narrow, yielding beliefs forever. It is not scientific to say God's spirit, God's love, God's entity, God's life, etc., for God is Spirit, is Life, is Love, is Entity. Xo more is it proper while speaking of visible man, to sa}~ man's spirit, man's entity, or man's life, for mortal phenomenal man does not own Spirit, but Spirit possesses the earthly man, which is but temporal itself, while these are the real, or stronger still, these are God. As this Science teaches that flesh, bones and blood are not Man; as it teaches that visible body or exist- ence is not like Deity, so it rejects all belief in the reality of so-called " matter." That which common thought names ' ' matter " has no entity, no life, no intelligence, and at best all objects beheld by sense are siniply reflections, and are no more the real than the picture reflected on the canvas is the real. A reflection is thrown from the human face or form by focalized power upon the sensitized plate in the camera, and a negative, or an inverted repre- sentation of the face, is obtained by chemical pro- cesses. The face has its picture taken, but the pic- ture is not the face after all. As the photograph is void of sensation, having progressed outward from its once invisible sensitive state, so the body and all 10 visible objects are void of sensation, and are only reflections or negative expressions of the real. Standing before a mirror an optical illusion pre- sents itself; you claim to see in it a reflection of that which you call your face, your hand, yourself, but this is not true, for you are not looking at anything in the glass, nor at an image on the chemical pre- paration adhering to the other side of the glass. You are the omnipresent eye of Spirit looking every way, and the reflection you claim to see in the mirror is simply the so-called u matter" or the re- flection which we call the body. That which is claimed by sense to be in the mirror, is just as much the real man as the flesh is; neither is the entity, the real, for both are reflections; and now having said both, we say there are not two, but only one. My point is, that while you claim to see your reflection in the mirror, it is simply the invisible you between the physical you and the mirror, and it is beholding your literal body which is the only reflection of the original idea. That which you seem to behold in the mirror and which you call a reflection of yourself, is absolutely your own face, and you are looking by deflected vision at it only. You are looking from the mirror and toward yourself. We mean just what we are saying here, and we are now correcting a long standing belief or delusion. When you seem to be 11 looking toward the mirror and think that you are looking at a reflection of yourself in it, it is a great mistake, for you are looking not toward the mirror, but from it, and the reflection you behold is your fleshly body only. This is absolutely true, and to anyone unfolded sufficiently in Spirit, we can demonstrate it. While you read this think on the optical illusion that we are correcting. Please stand before a mir- ror. Now touch your right ear. Looking, as you believe, toward the mirror, you claim that your right ear is opposite the right edge of the glass, but such is not true. Holding your finger on your right ear as } r ou claim, your error or delusion is corrected before the mirror, for you see that it is your left ear you are touching. We write this seated before a large mirror and the revelation of this essential point is rendered certain. James says : " Deceiving your own selves like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass, for he beholdeth himself, etc." This is oar point, that he is not beholding a reflection of himself, but he is actually seeing "himself" There is a deception or an illusion here, as in all phenome- nal appearances. The vision of sense is crossed and inverted, and you " straighticay forget what manner of man you are." We say that you do not see anything in the glass nor on the quicksilver, and is not this statement cor- 12 roct ? Hold your face or hand twelve inches from the mirror and the apparition or that which you see, seems to be twelve inches beyond the glass. Hold a pencil or the end of a cane against the glass and that which you call the reflection is the exact dis- tance from the glass. Now hold your pencil or a book flatwise against or near the glass, and you see the space or distance is the same. Step backward from the mirror ten feet ; now you see that the reflection as you have called it, is not in the mirror but has seemed to recede the same distance which you have. A little thought will show you that you are not looking at a reflection ten feet, nor even one foot back of the mirror. If you are beholding an apparition beyond the mirror, then you are looking through the quicksilver, and through the brick wall back of the mirror. The object you see is simply yourself. Again, moving your hand from and to- ward the mirror, you observe the velocity of the two is exactly the same. This is all owing to the fact that you are seeing whatever you are as a visible expression ; you are not seeing in the mirror a reflection of a reflection. You are the invisible idea of being reflected or turned outward through evolu- tion to existence, and when' you die, as sense or mortal mind says, the reflection or existence ceases or turns in, disappears from mortal sight through involution. It is drawn back to essential Substance 13 . or Spirit, hence of course lost to sensuous vision. The invisible idea, the thought, the pattern— or as theology and philosophy would express it — the spirit or spiritual idea is immortal, and forever beyond the reach of dissolution. But remember, in the im- mortal state it is absolutely invisible to mortal sight, yet it may again manifest, and again clothe itself with the illusion called flesh, but in its own order, viz. , through the procreative or generative principle on the physical plane. If this is a fair solution of reincarnation, embodiment, or what Jesus meant about Elijah and John, you have the benefit but may not see the Truth of it unless sufficiently spir- itual. As the being or ideal entity of the spirit of man comes out to identity, to existence, so all fruits, flowers, cereals and vegetation come forth from the invisible, from Spirit which is the true seed. The grass, fruit and leaves to spring next year, are now hidden in the invisible realm of causation, the uni- versal Sea, Spirit— God. The conceptions, births, animal and human, and the evolutions to be, a year hence, are delayed now for the involutions or turn- ing back of the bodies that will disappear, for action and reaction, demand and supply are equal. To decay or pass from sight, and then to re-clothe the idea with flesh and live another existence on earth, is what Jesus meant by, "If I go I will come again." 14 There is then no more reality in the ghost, the illusion called flesh, than there is in the mirror re- flection, for the flesh is the only reflection. With- draw from the mirror and there is no reflection ex- cept your body, so when Spirit suspends vitalizing activities in the flesh, the reflection, i. e. , the body or ghost will soon disappear, but the mental, invis- ible or spiritual idea which threw out the reflected expression of existence, will remain in entity, in immortality or being, and will continue as unending as God or the eternal NOW. If by the term Spiritual Man, you think of the earthly physical body with which physiology chiefly deals, you certainly fail to comprehend the higher understanding of the term. We neither mean the aggregated expression called flesh, nor the carnal mind exercising its brief illusions in every part of the flesh, for both the flesh and its animal mind must cease. It is as improper to hold that intelli- gence or Spiritual Man is this reflected expression, as it is to hold that God is this expression. Our clear Scientists have the key to immortality, while no one who believes this reflection, this physical illusion, this seeming to be Man, has a good under- standing of immortality. From the above reasoning in Science the reader sees that we deny the being of "matter" so-called. Materialism denies that there is Spirit, but holds that 15 " matter" is the basic principle, the one and only substance. Spiritual Science holds that there is but one substance, yet claims that it is Spirit. Common thought holds that there is Spirit and " matter," but this position of the past is rapidly yielding to Science or better thought. The common belief is that God or Spirit was prior to "matter," and that ' ' matter " or all visible things were produced later, but the difficulty is to tell us what "matter" was made of, when Spirit was be- fore it or first, and was the only intelligent some thing. If it was first, there was then no second ; if that which was first was Spirit then it was not "matter." Facing the common claim that intelli- gence or Spirit was first, will some one who says " matter" came forth afterward, tell us what it came from when there was not anything but Spirit ? To surmount the barrier on which they are stranding, they will tell a Scientist that something was made from " nothing " ! Xo solution of this problem comes up to correct understanding but Christian or Spiritual Science. It holds as above argued, that thoughts or ideas are the real and that these, being products of Spirit and in the Infinitude of Being, reflect their shape outward to sense sight. None of these visible or sense ob- jects are the real, nor are they another substance. The real are always the spiritual or invisible ideas. 16 To illustrate: an artist sees, i. e., he thinks into idea beautiful statuary before he chisels out the visi- ble expressions. The latter can be spoiled, even reduced to invisibility, but the spiritual conception will never be destroyed. Every visible object that exists, first had being in spiritual conception or thought. The existence of every visible expression is temporary and will cease or disappear, but the ideal or spiritual form is eternal and beyond decay. Teachers of all ages have used visible objects to represent Truth. In more elaborate works we use various comparisons; perhaps one here may aid the reader toward comprehending the fact that Spirit is omnipresent : Think of a large sponge filled with water. Let the sponge represent the entire uni- verse, and let the water filling it represent the uni- versal Sea of Spirit. No atom of the sponge is hidden or separate from the water. As you cannot separate the water even by thought from any atom of the sponge, no more can Spirit be separate from any place, not even from the minutest thought or invisible atom in all Nature or the universal realm. As water fills the interstices between the fine shot in a cup, and as light comes through the coarser atoms of glass, so Spirit fills the finer, even the in- visible spaces of thought or mind. When by the law of aggregation these invisible atoms of Spirit coalesce into the cruder state, assuming expression, IT it will do to call such mind, but not " matter." The invisible atoms, have simply been focalized or cemented by cohesion. It is logical to say that any- thing is, in quality, that of which it is formed, and as all sense objects are the outer expression of Spirit, they are Spirit, *. ou behold a reflection of your body, or do you behold your body only ? 4. Which is first, the body or the idea after which the body is formed? 5. After the mortal body has been disintegrated, does the idea or entity remain immortal? 6. While in the state where neither flesh nor blood can be, will there be any physical organism? 7. Will the Ego, the entity, again manifest itself, or come forth to the mortal state of individualized identity? 8. When formations come forth through evolution, and disappear through involution, do we not in this analogy find the meaning of resurrection as Paul understood it in the XV Chap, of I. Cor. ? 9. Through evolution and involution — or birth and death — do we not have proof that our spirit form can never be annihilated or become extinct? 10. After physical dissolution, does not a new body come forth through the same natural laws that furnish decaying grain with new bodies? 11. Does the term Spiritual Man mean the physical or- ganism? 12. As Spiritual Man means neither flesh nor blood, but means Immortal Mmd, Spirit or Deity, does not this system have the true key to immortality? 64 Lesson III. 1. In this Science, what doeS the term "Being" signify? 2. Spiritual Scientists hold that "All is Spirit;" Material- ists hold that "All is Matter." Which is Correct? 3. As yisible objects cannot come from "nothing,'* from what are' they prodiiceid? " 4. As Spirit is the intelligence that produces all objects; what does it produce them Of? 5. Is it not logical to say that the primal substance of every object is Spirit, since Spirit was first? 6. Is not every element known in Chemistry resolvable to invisibility? 7. If all elements are formed of Spirit, and if all are re- ducible to invisibility, what were they in substance when visible? 8. When a sponge is filled with water, can any atom of it be separate from the water? 9. Can any atom be separate from Spirit; if not, then is not Spirit all there is in the universe? 10. As Spirit or God is everywhere, can anything else be anywhere? 11. If Spirit is not everywhere, by what are atoms placed in all formations? 12. When the Materialist admits order in all the natural formations, does he not, in fact, admit our position that God or Creative Energy is everywhere? Lesson IV. 1. Does Science intend to compromise with theorists who argue separateness of Spirit and matter? 2. Is it necessary to assert that sense objects are "nothing" ? 3. Can intelligence use the term "nothing" intelligently? 4. When physiologists teach that flesh and bones are the real, do they not directly support materialism? 5. Can one be a supporter of materialism and be a con- sistent advocate of Spirit in any case? 6. Does not the theory that God is a personality and vis- ible contradict the fact that Deity is omnipresent Spirit? 7. Why do we deny the being of so called evil? 8. What are the mental states we call sin, disease, pain, etc.? 9. Are afflictions blessings, or curses? 10. You regard the claims of mortal mind as what? 11. How should a Mental Healer begin? 12. How can a healer fully in the Science control disease or mental states of the patient? Lesson V. 1. Do prudence and decorum assist the Healer? 2. What is it that cures? 65 3. State the best way to remove the work from person to Spirit. 4. What rules a meek or spiritual person? 5. What modes of mind assist healers? 6. Name mental states that harm, and states that help the patient. 7. How is the true healer best known? 8. True diagnosis is through what faculties? 9. Is it wise to tell patients they have this or that disease? 10. State how the work of healing is hindered if you ask what the disease or symptoms are. 11. State the advantages of listening when the patient of friends prefer to explain. 12. Through what mental states of the patient is healing aided? Lesson VI.— The Formula. 1. Which feels pain, the flesh or the sense mind? 2. While it is mind only that feels, should we address it, or the body? 3. Does the healer, while treating, talk orally or commu- nicate mentally with the patient? 4. Should the healer argue and contradict, or should he affirm mentally to the mind of the patient? 5 State some of the ideas or thoughts you gather from the formula given for silent treatment. 6. After the treatment, what naturally follows? 7. Do healers and patients usually exchange pleasing re- marks over the treatments? 8. Does their work bring happiness to the healer as well as to the patient? 9. Is not this relief of mind, this turning unto Truth, to be regarded as the woik of Truth, saving the needy and erring? 10. If the healer has time does he explain some of the Science to the patients? 11. What does the healer claim the forces often felt in the system during treatment to be? 12. Are thoughts things, and the real? Lesson VII. 1. What is the further and chief help the patient receives? 2. On what condition is this healing permanent? 3. What may fear, anger, pride, selfishness, jealousy, re- venge, avarice, malice, etc.. do, if continuously indulged? 4. Is the patient willing to turn from the use of drugs after successful treatment? 5. While the patient holds to drugs, does this hinder cure? 6. Is it best to ask the patient to give up drugs, or to treat his mind to do so? M 7. If a patient is conscious of the treatment, is such treat- ment mesmeric, or of Truth? 8. If the patient is not conscious of improvement, is it not probable that the healer lacks a proper understanding of the Science? 9. Can correct mental treatment facilitate the cure of a broken limb? 10. Is a broken limb to be regarded as disease proper? 11. Can a broken limb be treated by a physician so that it may progress to a state of disease, or cause disease elsewhere in the body? 12. Is the spirit, or the fleshly body to be regarded as the ghost? Lesson VIII. 1. What is the usual time occupied in the treatment proper? 2. Although a formula is given in our Text Book, should we use this form, or should we vary as conditions require? 3. Is it necessary for the healer to follow any set form? 4. Should we use the same mental words when treating all patients? 5. Does this book profess to give a fair idea for the treat- ment of every class of disease? 6. If an author or teacher were to lay down an exact form- ula to be followed, would he not thereby seem to advocate a material or intellectual rather than a spiritual method? 7. Does the Bible show that Jesus contradicted, or did He usually affirm to the mind of the patient? 8. Should Mental Healers ever make physical examina- tion? 9. Why does it hinder successful treatment for the healer to make physical examination? 10. As the cause of disease is mental, is it wise to treat physically ? 11. As we never use drugs or instruments, can it be said that we treat physically ? 12. When we cure scrofula, cancers, flesh wounds, etc., by mind only, can it be claimed that we treat with physics or surgery ? Lesson IX. 1. Does not this Science always teach that God or Truth is the direct means of cure, and that the only part a Mental Healer performs is to teach Truth or mentally talk disease away? 2. What distance should the healer sit from the patient? 3. State why the healer should not sit with his back toward the patient. 4. Should either patient or healer gaze around indfffer- ently? 5. State why healer and patient should sit with eyes closed, and the benefits thus derived. 6. Why does the first visit usually require more time? 7. When a healer is fully in the Science, what does he command? 8. What special directions should be observed by patient and healer to insure success? 9. State how disease can be forgotten and mastered? 10. Is it wise or unwise to tell another that he looks worse, pale or sick? 11. Can fear cause the state called death? 12. What is said about bleeding a person to death without drawing a drop of blood? Lesson X. 1. What is said about a patient when fright, anger, etc., affect him? 2. Why does a tooth often cease to ache when on the way to the dentist? 3. What is insanity, and what is said in our Text Book about the success of this system with the insane? 4. Do we claim to cure every kind or class of disease, if not every case? 5. If cure comes by those who use drugs, it is owing to what scientific fact? 6. Every drug given is a mental ministration in what way? 7. Can the mind of a physician prescribe a remedy super- ior to itself? 8. State the reason why death may result from poison. What is it that poisons? 9. Is a prime cause always invisible? 10. Is effect found only in visible things? 11. Cause being invisible, what is said about seeking cure through visible remedies? 12. Is not the invisible, the power that cures? Lesson XL 1. Which lessens disease, to agree with it as physicians do, or to ignore it as Christian Scientists do? 2. What is said about the chemical action of Spirit or Truth in healing? 3. If God is a personality "about the size and shape of a mortal man," as many claim, could fle then be in human bodies as Jesus taught, or could we as mortals be in Him, as Paul teaches? 4. Is it not idolatry to believe in drugs, or in a personal, visible God? 5. Name one dozen leading allopathic physicians of Europe and America, mentioned in our Text Book, who condemn their own system. 68 6. Of 1142 practicing graduates in allopathy, how many were incompetent to pass the National Examining Board, as per Dr. Gihon's report? 7. What is said about allopathy opposing Bible methods of cure ? 8. If Jesus could appear, would not allopathic colleges re- quire him to obtain a medical diploma in order to cure? 9. Does our system educate the patient to cure himself ? 10. Are not the heavy bills of physicians avoided by call- ing a Mental Healer instead? 11. What is said about the treatment of children by our method? 12. What is said against the belief that food causes dys- pepsia? Lesson XII —Special Questions. 1. Can you accept the science that Deity is the Life or in- visible Spirit of the universe? 2. Do you see that unity with the Father means the insep- arable blending with Omnipresent Spirit, and that no reference is had to flesh when thinking of our "likeness" of Deity? 3. Do you see that all the work of reform and the new systems of cure mean evidently the establishment of a system of religion eminently above the theology of to day? 4. Can you with our Scientists hold that the "coming" or "appearing of Christ" is invisible rather than visible? 5. Do you accept the scientific, or the theological interpre- tation of God, Heaven, the Bible, sin, disease and cure? 6- In your life and practice are you willing, to avoid all that harms? 7. Do you subscribe to the high moral claims of this Science? 8. Are you willing to continue the study of Mental Chris- tian Science works? 9. We hold it our duty to be charitable toward all, to care for the needy, and to minister also to those not able to pay : Are you in harmony with this? 10. Do you feel that you are led of Truth to enter this Work; do you desire to alleviate human distress and to aid mankind toward health and happiness ?- 11. Do you comprehend and accept the teachings of our Text Book? 12. Is your faith, in this Science {Strengthening; arcy©^ striving to become wiser and better, and may Reform find yoa heartily working for mankind? ■ ■ ■■-. - - y.i hi Q .- READ THIS EXF $$ 101 N. • i • The work "Mind- Healing Condensed," by A. J. Swarts, is special. Its first edition, under title "Spiritual Healing Formula," was riot offered to any dealer, but was disposed of to the interested only as the best Text Book to induct one fully, in to the Metaphysical Science. The former edition of 54 pages was sold to, many investigators of the Science at $5.00 per copy, and finally to healers, teachers and students for $2.00, but never less. I have materially improved this revised edition, yet holdfit within its present 70 pages, for its brevity or "conciseness, is its value. -It is the Absent Instructor for the Mind Healing School which pioneered this Cause in all the West.. TOj study this work thoroughly about a half dozen times through, will bring anyone into an understanding of the Science. as fully as any teacher can impart it orally. This edition will riot be given out to dealers, but will be continued as the Instruction Book of the •Spiritual Science University, whose 13oard of efficient Directors— four , of them teachers of the Science —have adopted it as the standard or medium, through which it imparts its system of Non^Rese- dent Instructions at any distance; even in Europe, l^nis ?.,,;, • • -,- .. .• ... ... . ■ $ ggmTis is the only School chartered by any State;, to^gra&uatite ab- sently in the Science. Our Charter from the State of Illi- nois expressly authorizes us to teach Absently and to confer degrees- This we have done upon nearly one thousand stu- dents, also upon a few beyond the limits of the United 70 States, in several nations. The State authorizes us to give a legal Diploma to those we instruct at the distance, as well as when present. Those who would take this Course, must thoroughly study "Mind Healing Condensed;" then write Lesson I, and the twelve numbers, in the same manner we have. They should Dot write our questions, but they will write their answers to each instead, and continue thus from Lesson I to Lesson XII. If they come into the ideas of the book, and send answers as stated elsewhere, it will entitle them to graduation and the Diploma, beautifully engraved and in two colors, with their name nicely engrossed in it. Ten dollars are required for graduation complete, which includes the book and Diploma. The book will be held at $2.00, but when obtained by any- one for perusal, he shall, upon sending in answers as above, and the balance, $8.00, receive the Diploma. The degree im- parted by this Diploma is S. S. D., which means Doctor of Spiritual Science, and entitles its possessor to affix the form Dr. to his or her name, and we will defend all of our graduates in the use of the same. A. J. Swarts, Ph.D. 1443 Michigan Ave., Chicago. Pres. 8. S. University. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 0002bflTEQ41 ■ ■ L ■ <% ■ Jm