k A Famous Men Series McKINLEI 'S M VS'I ERPIfl I S. McKINLEY'S MASTERPIECES SELECTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ADDRESSES IN AND < >UT < >F < I >NGR1 oi WILLIAM M« KINLEY EDI iii' i'V K. I. 4? y i . . \ j< >si I'll ^NIG©T C< >MPANY ^ 9 r, VZo^S'i £(.(,& Copyright, i8qb By Joseph Knight Company Colonial $rcss: C. H. Simonds & Co., Boston, Mass., U.S.A. Electrotyped by Geo. C Scott & Sons [NTRODIN 1< >RY STATEMEN I William McKinley stands high among America's greatest orators. This is the estimate of his own time, and it will be not less the verdict oi impartial history. Al- though his speeches have been many, m the halls .»i Congress, in political cam- paigns, and upon the thousand and one occasions where oratorical genius is de manded, there is no sameness, no monot ony, no dullness in the utterances oi M ( Kinli For clearness oi statement, irrefutable logi , vigor of expression, lofty moral tone, and those qualities which cany .nviction, he has had tew equals and no superiors. To read his spee< hes is to take lessons in the intricate problems oi Amen in political lite, and to gain a true percep- tion of the deeper philosophy underlying wise and salutary popular government. No American of this , in afford not t«. read McKinley's speeche To meet the needs ot the busy man, this selection <»t vii Vlll INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT. the masterpieces of McKinley's thought and diction has been prepared. And its compiler feels assured that no one will read even these few pages without gaining a higher ideal of public duty and a strongcr love of country. CONTENTS I '. i RODU< I' »R\ STA1 l-MI-.M . Vll Biographical Sketch • • xi I. The Republu an Par i y . - 1 1 I. Brief \m> i" i hi Point. I I . I'.i ■ I 111 MlCHIG II The Pi nvi Tariff . i II. On i mi Mills Bill. [II. The ( i i ■ I V I'm I m;ii l COMM1 \ \\ll\i I GIN V I I'm McKinley 1 »o. III. I III PURl IN "• I IN BA1 I "I I. 1 in W , I I. 'I'm Bl \< K < "i • III. Fair Eleciio \\ . I IN \N' I . . . I. Tin 1SI -I IEN1 Bond II. I'm Silver Bill. V I'm Inn oi Labor . ioi I. M i i ii \i in I'm:'. 1 1. I in Ami RIC w WOI KINGM \ I I I 1 in I.K.iii -HO W. X CONTENTS. VI. Educational Topics . . 108 I. In a Nutshell. II. Our Public Schools. III. History of Oberlin Collegi IV. Education and Citizenship. VII. Religion 120 I. To the Epworth Leaguk. II. An Auxiliary to Religio VIII. Miscellaneous Addresses . .126 I. Civil Service Reform. II. Notification Address to Presi dent Harrison. III. Not a Candidate. IV. Prosperity and Politk V. Presidential Candidates VI. On Counting a Quorum. IX. Memorial Day and Patriotism 140 I. Gems of Patriotic Expression. II. Memorial Day Address. III. The American Volunteer Soldi] X. Eulogies > . . 158 I. James A. Garfield. II. Ulysses S. Grant. III. John A. Logan. IV. Abraham Lincoln. XL Occasional Addresses 190 I. New England and the Future. II. July Fourth at Woodstock. III. Dedication of the Ohio Building IV. Business Man in Politics. BI< )(il< Al'IIK \l STs I I < II I \ the Directory published in 1877, nearly twenty years irs this modest noti< of one "i the newly elected members of the 15 tli ( longri Wiii.i \m M- Kim i y. Ji I inton, was born at Miles, Ohio, February 26th, 1844; en listed in the United States Army in May, 1861, as a private soldiei in the 23d Ohio Vbl- unteei Infantry, and was mustered out 1 ip- tain of the same regiment and I Maj< was Prosecuting Attorn Stark County, ( Mil... 1 • 1 and d to the 1.5th tigress as a Republican, n ng [< votes against 1 ',. 1 ■ ; v< »t II Sanborn, Democrat, and 2,441 votesfoi [ohn R. Powell, ( rreenba< k ( andidate. This is the simple story told nearly twenty us ag a new member of that House ol Representatives, and the d. mveniently divides the career of William M< Kinley into two great periods. Up to that time the young man had mad gallant record as a soldi. since then lie has made an even greater record as a statesman. In ancestry McKinley is a mixture of the \i KINLEYS MASTERPIECES. i and the Puritan. His ancestors originally from the western part of Scot- During the religious persecutions they, wiili hundreds of Covenanters, tied to Ireland, -in that country the two brothers, James i William, came to America, about twenty - five years before the battle of Bunker Hill, lames, then only a boy, settled in York, Penn- sylvania, where he married, and his son David ght under Washington in the Revolution. This David Mckinley was the great-grand- father of the eminent statesman toward whom the the nation are now turned. After the War ol [812 David McKinley moved to umbia ( lounty, Ohio, where he founded the Buckeye branch of the McKinley family. Major McKinley's mother, now living in •us old age, was an Allison, of English >d. She is a woman of remarkable intel- ual powers and a finely developed moral His father, who died at the age of ir, was a highly respected citizen of I. the extreme southwestern township Jnal Western Reserve. William \h Kmley, Jr., enjoyed the advan- 11. although not extensive, educa- Nis learning has been acquired in the university of the world, grappling with life's 1 problems, rather than in the cloistered »f the academy. For a short time he BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. Xlll attended the Allegheny College, but, between study and school - teaching, he had not ad- vanced far when the conflict between the States broke out. In June, 1861, an effective orator, who had frequently told of the horrors of slavery, spoke one evening in front of the village tavern in the little town of Poland. He called upon the people to rise to put down the incipient rebellion, and to punish the trai- tors who had fired upon the Stars and Stripes. Among his listeners was young William Mc- Kinley, Jr., then only seventeen years old, who had for several terms been a country school- teacher. The patriotic spirit of this little Western Reserve town contributed one company to the 23d Ohio regiment of the Union army. By a singular coincidence this regiment contained several names destined to rank high in the annals of fame, but none higher than that of the youthful school-teacher, who, against his father's wishes, had decided to bear his hum- ble part in the great task of saving the Union. Of this regiment William S. Rosecrans was a colonel ; Stanley Matthews, afterwards Justice of the Supreme Court, was the second officer, and Rutherford B. Hayes, afterwards Gov- ernor of Ohio and President of the United States, eventually assumed its command. McKinley enlisted as a private, became a xiv M( kinley's masterpieces. staff -officer under General Hayes, and for gallantry at Antietam was advanced to the the grade of Lieutenant by Governor Todd, of Ohio, and was afterwards brevetted Major by President Lincoln. It will thus be seen that the gallant Ohioan's military title is no idle compliment, but was honourably earned in the stubborn field of war. To relate the part which the brave young officer took in all the battles in which he was engaged would be a task beyond the limits of this sketch. Mili- tary records, in describing the battle of Ope- quan, fought under Sheridan, near Winchester, relate that early in the forenoon Captain Mc- Kinley, aide-de-camp, brought a verbal order to General Duval, commanding the second division, to take a new position. On receiv- ing the order, Duval inquired by what route he should move the command. After Mc- Kinley had suggested a route, Duval declared that he would not budge without definite or- ders, to which the youthful captain replied : " By command of General Crook, I order you to move your command up this ravine to a position on the right of the army." This forceful insistence, that orders intrusted to In in should be carried out, has been a prom- inent characteristic in McKinley's great ca- reer. Whether those commands have come from a superior officer in the field, or in the BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. XV voice of American electors, his loyal obedi- ence has been alike unflagging. General Sheridan, in his Memoirs, tells of meeting McKinley on his ride to Winchester, "Twenty miles away."' The acquaintan then formed ripened with the years, and is among Major McKinley's delightful recollec- tions. At the age of twenty-two. McKinley's military career was over, and he again entered civil life in Ohio. He studied law in the office of Judge Glidden, and took a brief course at the Albany law school gaining ad- mittance to the bar in 1867. In the little town of Canton, then a place of 5,000 inhab- itants, the young attorney put out his shingle. I lis career at the bar was short, but brilliant. Before long years of experience could bring to him the full fruition of the lawyer's aspira- tions, he was called to public life by a demand of duty no less emphatic than that which had enlisted him in the war. Including his ser- vice as district attorney, he was only nine years in the prat tice of his profession before he was elected to the National House of Representatives, and that was the time when the modest narrative at the opening of this sketch was penned. During this period, in 1871, Major McKin- ley was married t<> Miss Ida Saxton. Their family life has been most sweet and ennobling. xvi Mckinley's masterpieces. Two little girls were born to them, who each in turn passed away. Since the birth of their second daughter, in 1873, Mrs. McKinley has never seen a well day, and that calamity, with the bereavement that came to them in the loss of their little ones, has again emphasized the truth that honour and fame cannot make good the loss of loved ones. Owing to her afflic- tion, Mrs. McKinley rarely goes out and does not give large receptions, or, in general, attend to those social requirements which high official position is supposed to entail. The mutual devotion of the rugged statesman and his frail companion is one of the most touching exam- ples of love and fidelity which the country affords. With tender care and unselfish solicitude Major McKinley guards his wife, and never gives expression to the slightest disappointment when a much cherished plan has to be put aside by reason of her infirmities. The twenty years of Major McKinley's public life have been full of achievements too well known to need description. They are a part of our country's history, which nothing can efface. In all the aspects of greatness as a legislator McKinley has conspicuously ex- celled. As a participant in the congressional debates, he has had, since the war period almost no equal ; in that judicious manage- ment of forces and planning of campaign UK GRAPHICAL SKETCH. XV11 done in the committee-room, but so indispen- sable to the success of legislation, there has been but one McKinley. As a manager he is par excellence. Another of McKinley's re- markable traits of character is his untiring industry ; no detail that is related, however remotely, to large results, ever escapes his attention. l>y no accident of fatuitous cir- cumstance did he attain his great eminence in Congress, which led to his selection as chairman of the ways and means committee and majority leader on the lloor. Strict attention to duty, untiring study of all public questions, conscientious devotion to the in- terests of the people, and sterling patriotism were the elements that made his success in Congress. To summarize his achievements would be no light task. In the popular mind his name is enshrined with the great and beneficent principle of protection. This estimate is just and deserved, but it does not tell the whole truth. While McKinley is the greatest living champion of the doctrine of protection, he is in no sense a man of one idea. He is a grand all-around exponent of the principles of the Republican party, and not of any school or section of that magnificent organi- zation. McKinley is preeminent as a protec- tionist only because that doctrine is pre- wui m< kinlky's masterpieces. eminent among the tenets of Republicanism. But, back of any specific doctrine, he stands .squarely and strongly for the underlying prin- ciple of National Unity, in distinction from State Sovereignty, and for those corollaries in the philosophy of government which depend up«»n the inseparable union idea. To those battle-scarred veterans who made possible and enduring our national unity, he has always been a friend, and has invariably favored a generous pension policy, believing that the most which a grateful republic could do would be only tardy justice. On the vexed question of finance, McKinley now, and at all times, has typified Republicanism. He has always been unflinchingly for sound money, and at the same time has been friendly to silver, — a great American product, — and has striven to secure, through appropriate legislation, its largest possible use, consistent with the safe standards of Republican policy. Civil service reform lias found in him a warm friend, al- though he does not fail to recognize the fact that, in a large number of posts, those in sym- pathy with the administration in power can In- more efficient workers than those who are in opposition. For the rights of labor Mc- Kinley has always been a zealous champion. While in Congress he worked for the eight- hour law, and was one of the strongest advo- BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH. XIX cates of the bill for the settlement, by arbitra^ tion, of controversies between interstate car- riers and their employees. Democratic trickery unexpectedly put an end to the congressional career of Mr. McKinley. That party, having secured pos- session of the Legislature of Ohio, so gerry- mandered the State that from McKinley's old district an angel from heaven could not have been elected as a Republican. This was in 1890 that, after a vigorous campaign and a stubborn fight, McKinley laid clown his arms before the omnipotence of the gerry- mander. But such methods did not long avail to check a great career. In 1891 he was nominated for Governor of Ohio. That was a year of great Democratic victories, and in the four doubtful States in which guberna- torial elections were held, in Ohio alone, and under the leadership of McKinley, were the Republicans successful. Flower was elected Governor of New York, Boies of Iowa, and Russell of Massachusetts. But even in a tidal wave year the Napoleon of protection was too much for the hosts of Democracy. Of McKinley's administration as Governor, too fresh in the public mind to permit more than a brief reference, one commendation is sufficiently striking to tell the story. After a brilliant campaign in 1891 he was elected X\ Mi kinley's masterpieces. - pernor by about 20,000, while after the people tried him two years in that new relation, his majority, after a spirited contest, was over 80,000. As chief executive of the great ( lommonwealth McKinley has shown a genius for administration quite as remarkable as he had previously shown in Congress as a legis- lator, or as a youth he had shown on the field of battle. Soldier, statesman, executive, man and orator of preeminent ability, rare integ- rity, genial and gentle manners, McKinley is an ideal of American citizenship, and one whose life is worthy of the closest study of all his fellow countrymen. MCKINLEY'S MASTERPIECES. CHAPTER I. THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. It is fitting that these selections should begin with quotations from the speeches of Major McKinley on the general topic — The Republican Party. To this great historic party he lias given a life of devoted service; it, in turn, has honored him to the full measure of possibility. I. Brief and to the Point. " My fellow citizens, let us cherish the prin- ciples of our party and consecrate ourselves anew to their triumph. We have but to put our trust in the people ; we have but to keep in close touch with the people ; we have but to hearken to the voice of the people, as it comes to us from every quarter ; we have but to paint on our banners the sentiment the people have everywhere expressed at every election during the last tbree years- ' Patri- otism, Protection and Prosperity,' to win an- 21 m< kinley's masterpieces. other most glorious and decisive Republican National victory." — Marquette Club, Chicago, Feb, 12, 1896. •• It is not our habit or our history as Re- publicans to haul down or lower our colors. We put them where they are. We mean to keep them there." — Columbus, O., June 8, V- "The past of the Republican party is se- cure, its glory fills the world with wonder and admiration, and inspires mankind with new hopes and grander aspirations. The future is now our field; let us look to it. It opens with glorious possibilities and invites the party of ideas to enter and possess it. Let us ap- peal to the highest judgment and reason of the people, and our appeal will not be in vain." -Dayton, O., Oct. 18,1887. "The Republican party stands for a for- eign policy dictated by and imbued with a spirit that is genuinely American ; for a policy that will revive the National traditions and restore the National spirit which carried us proudly through the earlier years of the cen- tury. It stands for such a policy with all foreign nations as will insure, both to us and them, justi< e, impartiality, fairness, good faith, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. 23 dignity, and honor. It stands for the Monroe doctrine as Monroe himself proclaimed it, about which there is no division whatever among the American people. It stands now, as ever, for honest money and a chance to earn it by honest toil. It stands for a cur- rency of gold, silver, and paper with which to measure our exchanges, that shall be as sound as the Government and as untarnished as its honor." — Lincoln Banquet, Chicago^ Feb. 12, t8q6. " No one need be in any doubt about what the Republican party stands for. Its own history makes that too palpable and clear to admit of doubt. It stands for a reunited and recreated Nation, based upon free and honest elections in every township, county, city, district and State in this great American Union. It stands for the American fireside and the flag of the Nation. It stands for the American farm, the American factory, and the prosperity of all the American people. It stands for a reciprocity that reciprocates and which does not yield up to another country a single day's labor that belongs to the American working- man. It stands for international agreements, which get as much as they give, upon terms of mutual advantage. It stands for an ex- change of our surplus home products for such 24 Mckinley's masterpieces. foreign products as we consume but do not produce. It stands for the reciprocity of iJlaine; for the reciprocity of Harrison; for the restoration and extension of the principle embodied in the reciprocity provision of the Republican tariff in 1890." — Lincoln Banquet, Chicago, Feb. 12, 1896. "Much as the Republican party has done, it has great things yet to do. It will be a mighty force in the future as it has been a mighty force in the past. Its glories will continue to blaze on the heights, a beacon to the world, pointing to a higher destiny for mankind, and the upholding and uplifting of a Nation approved of God It will not pause in its march and achievements until the Flag, the Flag of the Stars, shall be the unques- tioned symbol of sovereignty at home and of American rights abroad; until American labor shall be securely shielded from the degrading competition of the Old World, and our entire citizenship from the vicious and criminal classes who are crowding our shores ; never while the advocates of a debased dollar threaten the country with its financial heresies ; and never until the free right to vote in every < oraer of the country shall be protected under the law, and by the law, and for the law; never until the American ballot-box shall be THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. 25 held as sacred as the American home." — Niles, 0/iio, Gubernatorial Campaign^ Oct. 22, I&QI. II. " The Republican Party. It offers its past as a guarantee for its future." " Mr. President^ Gentlemen of the Michigan Republican Club : — It gives me .sincere pleasure to meet with you to-night I have not met with the Republicans of Michigan since the great victory of 1894 — the great national victory and I bring to you my congratula- tions upon the proud part you bore in that great conflict resulting so triumphantly for Republican principles, and. as I believe, for the best interests of the whole country. I cannot believe that our principles are less dear to us in their triumph than they were in their temporary defeat. I cannot believe that the principles which won a most unprecedented victory from ocean to ocean require now either modification or abandonment. They are dearer and closer to the American heart than they have ever been in the past, and notwith- standing the magnificent victory of 1894, and notwithstanding these great principles are cherished in the hearts of the American people, there is still a greater and more sig- nificant battle to be fought in the near future, Mckinley's masterpieces. before we can realize those principles in administration and legislation. •• While, in the situation of the country, there is no cause for congratulation, this is not the time to employ terms of distrust or aggrava- tion. Times are bad enough, and the voice of encouragement is more appropriate than that of alarm and exaggeration. The realities are quite ugly enough, and it is the duty of each of us, by word and act, in so far as it can be done, to improve the present condition. But above all, we must not disparage our government. We must uphold it, and uphold it at all times and under all circumstances, notwithstanding that we may not be able to support the measures and policies of the present administration. Home prosperity is the only key to an easy treasury and a high credit. The Republican party never lowered the flag or the credit of the Government, but lias exalted both. I agree with the President, in his recent message, that a predicament ironts us. When I was here six years ago, reading from his message, it was a condition that confronted us, and that condition was an rflowing treasury, under Republican legis- lation. Now I come back to you, and it is a predicament that confronts the people of the United States, because of a deficiency created the legislation of a Democratic Congress and administration. THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. 27 " I am sure, however, that there is wisdom and patriotism ample enough in the country to relieve ourselves from this or any other predicament, and to place us once more at the head of the nations of the world in credit, production, and prosperity. The Republican party needs but to adhere faithfully to its principles — to the principles enunciated by its great national conventions, which guided the republic for a third of a century in safety and honor, which gave the country an ade- quate revenue, and, while doing that, labor received comfortable wages and steady em- ployment, which guarded every American interest at home and abroad with zealous care — principles, the application of which made us a nation of homes, of independent, prosper- ous freemen, where all had a fair chance and an equal opportunity in the race of life. You do not have to guess what the Republican party will do. The whole world knows its purposes. It has embodied them in law, and executed them in administration. It has bravely met every emergency, and has ever measured up to every new duty. It is dedi- cated to the people ; it stands for the United States. It practises what it preaches, and fearlessly enforces what it teaches. Its simple code is home and country. Its central idea is the well-being of the people, and all the Mckinley's masterpieces. people. It has no aim which does not take into account the honor of the Government, and the material advancement and happiness of the American people. The Republican party is neither an apology nor a reminiscence. It is proud of its past, and it sees greater usefulness in the future." — Michigan Club, Feb. 22, iSgjj. CHAPTER II. J III. PROTECTIVE TARIFF. Wn ii the great principle of protection the name of McKinley will ever he associated. In no land and in no age has this great economic policy had an abler expounder than he. Wherever this beneficent princi- ple finds complete adoption, and its wisdom becomes demonstrated. M< Kinley's part in bringing about that prosperity and well-being of the social order which will inevitably result can nowhere be forgotten. He is the great philosopher of protection. To select from his voluminous expositions of thi.-. policy has been no 3y task, but perhaps as representative a set of quotations as could be gathered is here found. < >ne selection is taken from his estimate of the Mills Bill, the great tarifl measure of the first Cleveland adminis- tration; while another comes from his speech on the Gorman tariff, the product of the second Cleveland administration. Another masterpiece is McKinley's discussion of the project for a tariff commission. It is here presented in part. "What protection means to Virginia" is an exposition of the effect of this eco- nomic philosophy, as applied to a particular locality; while McKinley's speech in presenting the tariff bill of 1890 is perhaps his most formal analysis of the pro- tection plan, and from this masterpiece very generous extracts are here reproduced. I. Nuggets. "The protective system must stand, or fall, as a whole. As Burke said of liberty : 'It is 29 30 m< kinley's masterpieces. the clear right of all, or -of none. It is only pcifect when universal.' It must be a pro- tective tariff for all interests requiring the encouragement of the Government, or it must be free trade or a revenue tariff and rest alike upon all classes and all portions of the country." -Address at Atlanta, Ga., Aug. 21, H. " We are faithfully wedded to the great principle of protection by every tie of party fealty and affection, and it is dearer to us now than ever before. Not only is it dearer to us as Republicans, but it has more devoted supporters among the great masses of the American people, irrespective of party, than at any previous period in our National his- tory. It is everywhere recognized and en- dorsed as the great, masterful, triumphant American principle — the key to our pros- perity in business, the safest prop to the Treasury of the United States, and the bul- wark of our national independence and finan- 1 ial honor. The question of the continuance or abandonment of our protective system has n the one great, overshadowing, vital ques- tion in American politics ever since Mr. Cleve- land opened the contest in December, 1887, to which the lamented James G. Blaine made swift reply from across the sea, and it will THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 3 I continue the issue until a truly American policy, for the good of America, is firmly established and perpetuated. The fight will go on- -and must go on — until the American system is everywhere recognized, until all nations come to understand and respect it as distinctly, and all Americans come to honor or love it as dearly, as they do the American flag. God grant the day may soon come when all partizan contention over it is forever at an end."- — Lincoln Banquet, Marquette Club, Chicago, Feb. 12, i8g6. " I believe that it is the duty of American Congressmen to legislate for American citi- zens, and not for foreign manufacturers. Let us take care of our own interests, and look to the well-being of our own citizens first." — Speech on Tariff of 188 j. "Hamilton and Madison, Jefferson ami Calhoun, Clay and Webster, ami Adams and Jackson always asserted and maintained the constitutionality of protection. Is Cleveland a better constitutional lawyer than Jefferson? Is Vilas more learned than Madison ? Wat- terson more profound than Clay? 1 Adlai Stevenson a better expounder of the Consti- tution than Andrew Jackson ? Are all of them combined safer interpreters of that great 32 Mckinley s masterpieces. instrument than the Supreme Court of the United States, which has never failed, when called upon, to sustain the constitutionality of a protective tariff. If it is in violation of any constitution, it is not that of the United States. It is a manifest violation of the Con- stitution of the Confederate States. Possibly, that is what they mean." At Beatrice, Ne- braska, August 2, i8g2. "Home competition will always bring prices to a fair and reasonable level, and prevent extortion and robbery. Success, or even apparent success, in any business or enter- prise, will incite others to engage in like en- terprises, and then follows healthful strife, the life of business, which inevitably results in cheapening the article produced."— Speech in Congress on Wool lar iff Bill, i8y8. " With me, protection is a deep conviction, not a theory. I believe in it, and thus warmly advocate it, because enveloped in it are my country's highest development and greatest prosperity ; out of it come the greatest gains to the people, the greatest comforts to the masses, the widest encouragement for manly aspirations, with the best and largest rewards for honest efforts dignifying and elevating our citizenship, upon which the safety, the I UK PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 33 purity, and permanency of our political sys- stem depend." -Fifty-first Congress, May 7, iSgo. "Protection builds up; a revenue tariff tears down. 1'rotcction brings hope and cour- age to heart and heme: free trade drives them from both. Free trade levels down; protection levels up." mvention <>/ Repub- lican College Clubs, .lun Arbor, Midi., May 17 > l8Q2. " Our philosophy includes the grower ol the wool, the weaver ol the fabric, the seamstress, and the tailor. Tariff reformers have no thought of these toilers. They can bear their hard t.isks in pun hin- poverty tor the .sake ol cheap coats, which prove by tar tin- dearest when measured by sweat and toil. The tai in reformers concern themselves only about (heap coats and cheap .shoes. We do not overlook the comfort of those who make the coats and make the shoes, and will provide the wool and the cloth, the hides and the leather.'" /// reply to Mr. Cleveland, Toledo, Ohio, Feb. 12, t8qi. "The farmer is best oft" with a home mar- ket. The fanner himself knows this, and no amount of rhetoric can deceive him. The 34 Mckinley's masterpieces. fathers of the republic saw it and proclaimed it. We can only have a profitable home mar- ket by encouraging manufacturing industries. k Plant the forge by the farm," is the old doc- trine, and it is as true now as it was when uttered." — Speech on Morrison Tariff Bill, House of Representatives, April jo, 1884. II. On the Mills Bill. " What is a protective tariff ? It is a tariff upon foreign imports so adjusted as to secure the necessary revenue, and judiciously im- posed upon those foreign products the like of which are produced at home or the like of which we are capable of producing at home, it imposes the duty upon the competing for- eign product ; it makes it bear the burden or duty, and, as far as possible, luxuries only excepted, permits the non- competing foreign product to come in free of duty. Articles of common use, comfort and necessity, which we cannot produce here, it sends to the people untaxed and free from custom-house exac- tions. Tea, coffee, spices, and drugs are such articles, and under our system are upon the free list. It says to our foreign com- petitor, if you want to bring your merchandise here, your farm products here, your coal and iron ore, your wool, your salt, your pottery, your glass, your cottons and woolens, and sell THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 35 alongside of our producers in our markets, we will make your product bear a duty ; in effect, pay for the privilege of doing it. kk Our kind of tariff makes the competing foreign article carry the burden, draw the load, supply the revenue ; and in performing this essential office it encourages at the same time our own industries and protects our own people in their chosen employments. That is the mission and purpose of a protect- ive tariff. That is what we mean to maintain, and any measure which will destroy it we shall firmly resist; and if beaten on this floor, we will appeal from your decision to the people, before whom parties and policies must at last be tried. We have free trade among our- selves throughout thirty-eight States and the Territories and among sixty millions of people. Absolute freedom of exchange within our own borders and among our own citizens is the law of the Republic. Reasonable taxation and restraint upon those without is the dic- tate of enlightened patriotism and the doc- trine of the Republican party." — House of Representatives, May 18, 1888. III. The Gorman Tariff. " Mr. President and My Fellow Citizens : — I recall with emotion my last visit to your city. M< kinley's masterpieces. It was in the political campaign of 1884, when the great leader and statesman of the State of Maine, the beloved by all the country, was the presidential candidate of the Repub- lican party. He was a leader around whom all Ohio Republicans were proud to rally, and to whom they gave a warm, earnest, and cheer- ful support. He lost the presidency, but could not be deprived of a place in history which that great office, exalted as it is, could not have brightened, and failure to secure which could not blast. " For, more and better than all else, he has a place in the hearts of the people, as ten- der and affectionate as that of almost any other American statesman living or dead." •• For eighteen months, my fellow citizens, the Democratic President and Democratic ( longress have been running the Government, during which time little else has been run- ning. Industry has been practically stopped. Labor has found little employment, and when employed it has been at greatly reduced wag< Both Government and people have n draining their reserves, and both have been running in debt. The Government has suffered in its revenues and the people in their incomi The total losses to the coun- in business, property, and wages are be- nd human calculation. There has been no THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 37 cessation in the waste of wealth and wages; no contentment, brightness or hope has any- where appeared. Discontent and distress have been universal. The appeals to charity have never been so numerous and incessant, nor their necessity everywhere so manifest. " Congress has disappointed the people, trifled with the sacred trust confided to it, ex- cited distrust and disgust among their constit- uents and impaired their enterprises and invest- ments. In almost continuous session for thir- teen months they have done nothing but aggravate the situation. Pledged, if plat- forms mean anything, to overthrow our long continued policy of protection, they have quarreled and compromised, and, upon their own testimony, have been compromised. " The result of their long wrangle is a tar- iff law with which nobody is satisfied. " A law which even those who made it apol- ogize for. " A law which the chairman of the Com- mittee on Ways and Means and almost the entire Democratic side of the House con- demned by a yea and nay vote only a few days before its passage, affirming their inten- tion in the most solemn manner not to permit it to be enacted. " A law which was never approved by a majority of either the House Committee on Mi kinley's masterpieces. Ways and Means or the Senate Committee of Finance, who were charged with the prepara- tion and management of the bill. •• A law which all factions of the Democratic party agree is the work of a monstrous trust, which Chairman Wilson confessed, amid the applause of his confederates, with deep cha- grin and humiliation, ' held Congress by the throat.' "The history of the new tariff legislation is interesting and instructive. The House, which alone has the power to originate rev- enue bills, passed what is known as the Wil- son bill, a measure which has the unenviable distinction of being the only tariff bill in our history that was ever indorsed by a President in his annual message to Congress before it had been reported to the House, and before it had ever been officially adopted by the Ways and Means Committee. It was osten- sibly a tariff bill for revenue, and yet on its face it did not raise sufficient revenue to conduct tin- Cox-eminent. If that bill had become a law. every estimate I have seen touching its revenue- raising power created an annua] deficiency of from $40,000,000 to 00,000. The bill went to the Senate and took the usual course of reference to the Committee on Finance, which is, barged with the revenue THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 39 legislation of the Senate. After long consid- eration by the committee, the Wilson bill, with more than four hundred amendments, was re- ported to the Senate. But after much talking and wrangling it was soon made manifest that neither the Wilson bill, nor the Wilson bill with the Finance Committee's amendments could pass that body. " And so, taking the matter out of the hands of the Senate and out of the hands of the Finance Committee of the Senate, a self- constituted Adjusting Committee, — a commit- tee unknown to the Constitution, a committee unauthorized by the rules of the Senate or by party caucus or custom, — an Adjusting Committee, consisting of Messrs. Jones of Arkansas, Vest of Missouri, and Harris of Tennessee, undertook to make a bill which would receive the votes of forty -three Sen- ators or a bare majority of all. " The Democratic party is a most remark- able party. They are for anything to get power, but they are never for anything which got them power. "They were for free raw materials in the campaign of 1892. But they were opposed to free raw materials after the campaign was successful, and when they possessed the power to make them free. " They were vociferously opposed to trusts KINLEY's MASTERPIECE-. in their platform and on the stump when they e trying to £et back into office. But it is ied that they became the willing tools and advocates of trusts when opportunity came to strike the blow against them. • I'hcy posed as the true and only friends of labor during the summer and fall of 1892. and even pointed to the Homestead riots as the direct and logical fruits of Republican g - uion. But since that time they have indicted upon American labor the deadliest blow it has received. Their policy had re- duced wages and beggared labor beyond -cription. 1 hey promised the farmer better prices his wheat and wool when thev were seeking vote. But when they once obtained his sur g .heir economic policy began to force down the prices daily until it has now reached the 1 - point known for nearly fiftv disappointed even- reasc lable they raised in the campaign of but justified even- fear or evil prediction them. They have ignored even I hey have disregarded every obi iga- "• ken faith with a trusting ; sed their insincerity and They appear before the pie to-day totally discredited THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 4 1 and in disgrace, upon their own confessions, before the close of half of the presidential tenn. They have utterly failed to redeem any pledge made to the people, and after more than a year's continuous session of Congress are forced to acknowledge their infirmity, imbe- cility, and the lack of united purpose to carry out any single one of the great promises of the campaign. They have exhibited their inherent weakness and have disclosed irreconcilable differences with the party. " The Senate does not agree with the House, nor the House with the Senate, nor either with itself or the President, while the great body of the people is decidedly at variance with all of them. " Under such anomalous circumstances, is it any wonder that President Cleveland, in his letter to Chairman Wilson, should have mournfullv exclaimed : J - ' There is no excuse for mistaking or mis- apprehending the feeling and the temper of the rank and file of the Democracy. They are downcast under the assertion that their party fails in ability to manage the Govern- ment, and they are apprehensive that efforts to brins; about tariff reform may fail ; but they are much more downcast and apprehen- sive in their fear that Democratic principles may be surrendered.' i_. Mckinley's masterpieces. "No party can be safely trusted with the red interests of the people or the Govern- ment, without it possesses a fixed, honest, and enlightened purpose. Singleness of purpose is i: uv to every reform, indispensable to wise administration and legislation. The want this quality is the infirmity of the present Administration and the present Congress. • Failure and disappointment were bound to follow an Administration and Congress thus chosen, and the whole country suffers as a result. Tiie Administration and Congress are without compass or rudder. They have at length passed a tariff law, such as it is, but if we credit Democratic testimony alone the ►pie burn with impatience for an oppor- tunity to repudiate both it and them. •• We could bear with resignation their party differences and demoralization if the Demo- :i< party was the sole sufferer. But when ntemplate the widespread ruin to busi- nd enterprise, and employment, we ap- the dreadful sacrifice which this Administration has entailed, and the appalling ' keofi Bangor, Me., Sept. 8, 1894. IV. The Tariff Commission. 'I he tariff question has again forced itself • promineno While it lias never ceased THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 43 to be a question upon which the political parties of the country have made some declar- ation, yet for many years other issues have in a great measure determined party divisions and controlled party discipline. The last presidential campaign brought recognition and discussion of this issue, and it may be fairly said that Republican advocacy of the protective principle contributed in no small degree to the success of the Republican national ticket. It can safely be asserted that the doctrine of a tariff for revenue and protection as against a tariff for revenue only is the dominant sentiment in the United States to-day ; and if a vote upon that issue, with every other question eliminated, could be had, the majority would not only be large, but surprisingly large, for the protective principle. " The Democratic majorities in the Forty- fourth, Forty-fifth, and Forty-sixth Congresses, although committed by party utterances and by platforms as well as the pledges of leaders to a reduction of duties to a revenue basis, were unable, with all their party machinery and the free use of the party lash, to advance even a step in that direction. Every proposi- tion for a change was met with the almost solid opposition of this side of the House, which, with the assistance of a few Repre- sentatives on the other side from Pennsyl- }) McKINLEYS MASTERPIECES. vania and the New England States, was strong enough to insure, and did insure, the substantial defeat of every measure looking to a disturbance of the existing tariff rates. " Much criticism is indulged in by the I democratic party upon the enormities of our tariff, and yet with those years of power, in absolute control of the House, and a part of that time controlling the Senate as well, noth- ing was accomplished by way of removing the so-called enormities, and at last the party was compelled to confess that it was unable to make any progress in that direction. 'This is some evidence at least of the domination in this country of the protective idea, or else it demonstrates the infidelity of the Democratic party to its professed princi- ples ; one or the other. I prefer to interpret the former as its meaning. The sentiment is m. rely growing. It has friends to-day that it never had in the past. Its adherents are no '">'- >n!ined to the North and the East, but are found in the South and in the West.' Hie idea travels with industry, and is the late of enterprise and thrift. It encour- the development of skill, labor, and •".us as part of the great produc- "e forces. Its advocacy is no longer limited '"• manufacturer, but it has friends the devote d among the farmers, the wool THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 45 growers, the laborers, and the producers of the land. It is as strong in the country as in the manufacturing towns or the cities ; and while it is not taught generally in our col- leges, and our young men fresh from univer- sities join with the free-trade thought of the country, practical business and every-day ex- perience later teach them that there are other sources of knowledge besides books, that demonstration is better than theory, and that actual results outweigh an idle philosophy. But, while it is not favored in the colleges, it is taught in the school of experience, in the workshop, where honest men perform an honest day's labor, and where capital seeks the development of national wealth. It is, in my judgment, fixed in our national policy, and no party is strong enough to overthrow it. " It has become a part of our system, inter- woven with our business enterprises every- where, and is to-day better entitled to be called ' the American system ' than it was in 1824, when Henry Clay christened it with that designation. Fixed as I believe the principle is, the details of an equitable and equal adjustment of the schedule of duties, recognizing fully this idea, fair to all interests, is the work of this House, either through its appropriate committee, or calling to its aid \1< KIM INS MASTERPIECES. primarily a commission of experts, as pro- posed by the bill now under consideration. My own preference would be that Congress should do this work, and delegate no part of it to commissions or committees unknown in this body. This, however, is a matter of personal judgment, about which men equally intelligent and honest, equally devoted to protection, may differ. 11 1 can not refrain from saying that we are taking a new and somewhat hazardous step in delegating a duty that we ought our- selves to perform — a duty confided to us by the Constitution, and to no others. It is true that a commission does not legislate, and, therefore, its work may or may not be adopted by Congress. This is the safety of the ►position. The information it will furnish will be important, and its statistics of rare value, but the same sources of information are open to Congress and to the Committee on Ways and Means as will be available to ommission ; and as the former will ulti- mately have to deal with the question practi- cally in Congress, it has seemed to me, if that committee were willing to undertake the task and had the requisite time to perform it, h would be the wisest and most certain ■ to the accomplishment of results de- red by all. THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 47 " The argument that the proposition for a commission is the suggestion of the protec- tionists, to secure delay and to postpone present action upon the tariff, comes with bad grace from the party upon the other side of this House. It wasted six years and secured no revision of the tariff. It refused, in the Forty -sixth Congress, to pass the Eaton bill for a tariff commission, which required the report to be made on the first of January last, and which, if they had acted upon it during the closing session of the Forty-sixth Congress, the work of the commission would now have been in the possession of Congress for immediate consideration and practical action. My friend from Kentucky [Mr. Turner], in his speech of March 8, 1882, said : "' I regard it [a commission] like an affidavit filed in a criminal case, merely for the continuance of a bad cause.' " If a bad cause, why did not your party abate it when you were in power? If it is an affidavit for a continuance, I beg to remind the gentleman that it was his party which prepared and filed it nearly two years ago, when it had the House and the Senate, and could have disposed of it according to its own liking. Senator Eaton, a distinguished m« kinley's masterpieces. Democrat, high in the councils of his party, presented the original bill, and for many months it was on the Speaker's desk of a Democratic House, where it was left undis- posed of, insuring still further postponement. The Democratic party, and no other, is re- sponsible for the delay, and I charge any injury which delay has produced upon it. " Mr. Chairman, the wages question as related to the tariff is well illustrated by the following from the Rice Association of >rgia: •• In the period between 1840 and i860 the duty on ign rice was absolutely needless as a protection to the American producer, and valueless as a source of nue to the Government. The farmer was wholly independent of protection to an industry maintained laboi in cheapness second to that of Asia only, and in effectiveness unsurpassed. By reason of that • heap labor he was in a position to defy competition, and triumphantly met the almost free importation of t India rice, even in the English markets.' •• The per diem of slave labor at that time did not much, if at all, exceed twenty cents. 'This fact is the best argument that can be made, and needs no elaboration. It tells the whole story. With slave labor at twenty < enl day. or Asiatic cheap labor, we need if protection, and save for the purposes of ie our custom-houses might be closed. THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 49 When the South depended upon the labor of its slaves, and employed little or no free labor, it was as earnest an advocate of free trade as is England to-day. Now that it must resort to free labor, it is placed upon the same foot- ing as Northern producers ; it is compelled to pay a like rate of wages for a day's work, and therefore demands protection against the foreign producer, whose product is made or grown by a cheaper labor. And we find all through the South a demand for protection to American industry against a foreign compe- tition, bent upon their destruction and deter- mined to possess the American market. " But our laboring men are not content with the hedger's and ditcher's rate of pay. No worthy American wants to reduce the price of labor in the United States. It ought not to be reduced ; for the sake of the laborer and his family and the good of society it ought to be maintained. To increase it would be in better harmony with the public sense. Our labor must not be debased, nor our labor- ers degraded to the level of slaves, nor any pauper or servile system in any form, nor under any guise whatsoever, at home or abroad. Our civilization will not permit it. Our humanity forbids it. Our traditions are opposed to it. The stability of our institu- tions rests upon the contentment and intelli- M< kinley's masterpieces. gence of all our people, and these can only possessed by maintaining the dignity of labor and securing to it its just rewards. That protection opens new avenues for em- ployment, broadens and diversifies the field of labor, and presents variety of vocation, is manifest from our own experience. " Free trade may be suitable to Great Brit- tain and its peculiar social and political struc- ture, but it has no place in this Republic, where classes are unknown and where caste has long since been banished ; where equality is the rule ; where labor is dignified and hon- orable ; where education and improvement arc the individual striving of every citizen, no matter what may be the accident of his birth or the poverty of his early surroundings. Here the mechanic of to-day is the manufac- turer of a few years hence. Under such con- ditions, free trade can have no abiding -place hei We are doing very well; no other nation has done better, or makes a better showing in the world's balance-sheet. We ought to be satisfied with the progress thus far made, and contented with our outlook for the future. We know what we have done and what we can do under the policy of protec- tion. We have had some experience with a enue tariff, which neither inspires hope, n.. r courage, nor confidence. Our own his- THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 5 I tory condemns the policy we oppose, and is the best vindication of the policy which we advocate. It needs no other. It furnished us in part the money to prosecute the war for the Union to a successful termination ; it has assisted largely in furnishing the revenue to meet our great public expenditures and dimin ish with unparalleled rapidity our great na- tional debt ; it has contributed in securing to us an unexampled credit ; it has developed the resources of the country and quickened the energies of our people ; it has made us what the nation should be, independent and self - reliant ; it has made us industrious in peace, and secured us independence in war; and we find ourselves in the beginning of the second century of the Republic without a superior in industrial arts, without an equal in commercial prosperity, with a sound financial system, with an overflowing treasury, blessed at home and at peace with all mankind. Shall we reverse the policy which has rewarded us with such magnificent results ? Shall we aban- don the policy which, pursued for twenty years, has produced such unparalleled growth and prosperity ? " No, no. Let us, Mr. Chairman, pass this bill. The creation of a commission will give no alarm to business, will menace no industry in the United States. Whatever of good it M( kinley's masterpieces. brings to us on the first Monday in December next we can accept; all else we can and will reject." House of Representatives, April 6, V What Protection Means to Virginia. •• J/i Fellow Citizens : — I come to your State upon the invitation of the Chairman of the Republican State Committee, to talk to you about the country and its condition, and the relation of the two political parties to our present and future. I do not come to tell you the splendid story of the Republican party in the past, for with that you are all familiar. I come rather to talk to you of the future, of that which concerns your labor, your material int. . and your individual as well as the general prosperity. I come to say in Virginia i isely what I have said in Ohio, for there me thing that can always be said about the Republican party- - it is a national party. It advocates the same principles in Ohio and Massachusetts, in New York and New Jersey, that it advocates in Virginia, Mississippi, and rth and South Carolina; for wherever you find Republicans, whether it is in one of the of the North, or in one of the States ol the South, you find them always standing ii the same platform, always carrying the THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 53 same flag, always in favor of national unity and national prosperity. " A great question, my fellow citizens, be- fore this country — a question of the now and a question of the hereafter — is whether we shall have maintained in the United States a system of protection to American labor and American development, or whether we shall have practical free trade with all the countries of the world, and impose no duties except for revenue upon articles of merchandise, and products that may be brought into the United States. No, we want no free trade. First of all, we want to know which party, if any, is in favor of free trade ? And which party is in favor of a protective tariff ? You say that the Democratic party is in favor of free trade, and the Republican party in favor of protection. But there are a good many Democrats who say they are in favor of protection. There are two ways of determining the position of a political party : one is by its platforms, the other is by its record and its votes in the Congress of the United States. " Let us try the Democratic and Republican parties by this test for a moment, because I would not do the Democratic party any injus- tice upon this subject if I could ; and I assert here to-night, and I challenge contradiction by any gentleman in this audience, or elsewhere, M< KIM l.\ 'S MASTERPIECES. that since 1840, and before, with just two eptions, the Democratic party of the United States in national conventions and in national platforms, from 1840 to 1884, has declared in favor of a revenue tariff closely approximating free trade. They did it in [840, they did it in 1844, they did it in 1848, they did it in 1852, they did it in 1856, they did it in [860, and again in 1868, with a suggestion of 'incidental protection,' and they omitted it in \ and 1872. And why did they omit it? They omitted it in 1872, because in that year the Democratic party nominated for its presiden- tial candidate the old Republican leader, Horace Greeley, who had taught the younger nun of this country the great doctrine of American protection, and they did not, there- fore, that year dare to declare in favor of free de with a protectionist standing on their platform. •• Now, my fellow citizens, what is this tar- It is very largely misunderstood, or, rather, it is very little understood, and, if I < an to-night make this audience, the humblest ind the youngest in it, understand what the tariff means, I will feel that I have been well paid foi my trip to Virginia. What then is The tariff, my fellow citizens, is a put upon goods made outside of the ited Stales, and broughl into the United THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 55 States for sale and consumption. That is, we say to England, we say to Germany, we say to France, ' If you want to sell your goods to the people of the United States, you must pay so much for the privilege of doing it ; you must pay so much per ton, so much per yard, so much per foot, as the case may be, for the privilege of selling to the American people, and what you pay in that form, goes into the public treasury to help discharge the public burdens.' It is just like the little city of Petersburg, for example. I do not know what your customs may be, but in many cities of the North, if a man comes to our cities and wants to sell goods to our people on the street, not to occupy any of our business houses, not being a permanent resident or trader, not living there, but travelling and selling from town to town, if he comes to one of our little cities in Ohio, we say to him : ' Sir, you must pay so much into the city treasury for the privilege of selling goods to our people here.' Now, why do we do that ? We do it to protect our own merchants. " Just so our Government says to the coun- tries of the Old World ; it says to England and the rest: 'If you want to come in and sell to our people, you must pay something for the privilege of doing it, and pay it at the Treasury and at the custom-houses,' and that Mckinley's masterpieces. s into the Treasury of the United States to lulp discharge the public debt and pay the current expenses of the Government. Now, that is the tariff, and if any man at this point wants to ask me any questions about it, I want him to do it now, for I don't want, when 1 .mi -one, to have some Democrat say, 'If I could only have had an opportunity to ask him a question, I would like to have done it, ause I could have exposed the fallacy of his argument.' So I want him to do it now. " 1 said to the people of Ohio, when we were making our canvass this year, ' Elect a Republican Legislature, so that we may send John Sherman back to the Senate of the United States, and thereby preserve a Re- publican majority in that great parliamentary body.' And I say to the citizens of Virginia, 1 do not care what your politics are, I do not « are where you stood during the great Civil War, -if you are interested in the develop- ment of a new and progressive order of things in Virginia,— I say to you, as I said to the people of ( >hio, ' Elect a Legislature that will send to the Senate of the United States a man who will vote for a protective tariff,' and who has done it over and over again, and if you do that, the Republican party will pre- serve its majority in that great body, which is the only Republican citadel we have left. THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 57 The House is Democratic; the President is Democratic, or they think he is. They thought he was, but I do not know how he is going to turn out. They have the House and the President, and if General Mahone is defeated in Virginia, I do not know that it is possible for the Republicans to preserve the Senate during the entire administration of Grover Cleveland. " Now, my fellow citizens, a little more about the tariff. It is a very dry subject, but it is a subject which affects your purse, your dress, your living, and your homes; it affects your every -day interests, and your ability to live in comfort, and to keep your family from want. " Why, they call me a high protectionist ; I am a high protectionist; I do not deny it, and I would not be seriously disturbed in mind if the tariff were a little higher. Do you know of any reason in the world why Americans should not make every- thing that Americans need? There is, in- deed, no reason. We have the capital ; we have the skill; we have all the elements of Nature ; we have everything we need, and I would make the duty so high that there would be fewer English goods coming into the United States and more American goods con- sumed at home. Do you think there would M< kinley's masterpieces. an idle man in America if we manufactured everything that Americans used ? Do you think if we did n't buy anything from abroad at all, but made everything we needed, that every man would not be employed in the United States, and employed at a profitable remuneration? Why, everybody is benefited by protection, even the people who do not believe in it --for they get great benefit out of it, but will not confess it; and that is what i^ the matter with Virginia. Heretofore, she lias not believed in it. You have not had a public man that I know of in Washington for twenty-five years, save one, except the Repub- lieans, who did not vote against the great doctrine of American protection, American industries, and American labor ; and do you imagine that anybody is coming to Virginia with his money to build a mill, or a factory, or a furnace, and develop your coal and your ore, bring his money down here, when you vote ry time against his interests — and don't let those who favor them vote at all? No. If you think so, you might just as well be un- deceived now, for they will not come. "Why. old John Randolph, I don't know how many years ago, said on the floor of the American Congress, in opposing a protective tariff, * he did not believe in manufactories.' Why,' -;ii>l he. -it you have manufactories in THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 59 Philadelphia, you will have cholera six months in the year.' That was what the ' Sage of Roanoke ' said, and Virginia seems to be still following the sentiments he uttered years and years ago. " I tell you, manufactories do not bring cholera --they bring coin, coin; coin for the poor man, coin for the rich, coin for every- body who will work, comfort and contentment for all deserving people. And, if you vote for increasing manufactories, my fellow citi- zens, you will vote for the best interests of your own State, and you will be making iron, and steel, and pottery, and all the great leading products, just as Ohio and Pennsylvania are making them to-day. "Tell me why your land in Virginia, in 1880, was worth an average price of but $10.92 all over the State, while over in Penn- sylvania the average price per acre was $49. Virginia has just as good soil as Pennsyl- vania. Virginia has just as rich minerals as Pennsylvania, and what makes the difference between the $11 and $49 is, that you have little development in Virginia-- and your old policy will never bring more. " Stand by your interests - - stand by the party that stands by the people. Because in the Republican party there is no such thing as class or caste. The humble, poor colored 60 m< kinley's masterpipxes. man in the Republican party, the humble, poor white man in the Republican party, has an equal chance with the opulent white or colored Republican in the race of life. And so with every race, and every nationality, the Republican party says, 'Come up higher!' We do not appeal to passions ; we do not appeal to baser instincts; we do not appeal to race or war prejudices. We do appeal to your consciences ; we do appeal to your own ; interests, to stand by a party that stands by the people. Vote the Republican ticket, stand by the protective policy, stand by American industries, stand by that policy which believes in American work for Ameri- i an workmen, that believes in American wages for American laborers, that believes in American homes • for American citizens. Vote to maintain that system by which you ( an earn enough not only to give you the comforts of life, but the refinements of life; enough to educate and equip your children, who may not have been fortunate by birth, who may not have been born with a silver spoon in their mouths; enough to enable il 'fin in turn to educate and prepare their < hildivn for the great possibilities of Ameri- can lltr - • am for America, because America foi the common people. We have no kings, we have no dukes, we have no lords. THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 6 1 Every man in this country represents the sovereign power of this great Government, and every man has equal power with every other man to clothe that sovereign with his will. I believe in America, because we have no laws in this country like the old laws of primogeniture, where everything goes to the first-born ; and I like this country for another thing : When the rich man dies he cannot en- tail his property. Often the boy he leaves behind him, reared in luxury and wealth, if raised to do nothing, can not take care of the property left him. I will tell you how it is up in our country, and I want it so down here in Virginia. In less than twenty-five years the son of a poor man has a part of the wealth which the opulent ancestor left that will not stay with his unworthy descendant. And so everybody gets a chance after a while. The wealthy men of our country to-day were poor men forty years ago, and the future man- ufacturers are the mechanics of the present. Make that possible in Virginia, and you will win. Make it possible to break down the prejudices of the past. Get out from under your ancestral tree. Recognize and give force to the Constitution, permit every man to vote for the party of his choice, and have his ballot honestly counted. Push to the front where you belong as a State and a people. Mi kinley's masterpieces. •• Be assured that the Republicans of the North harbor no resentments — only ask for the results of the war. They wish you the highest prosperity and greatest development. They bid you, in the language of Whittier: • • • \ schoolhouse plant on every hill Stretching in radiate nerve-lines thence, The quick wires of intelligence; Till North and South together brought Shall own the same electric thought ; In peace a common flag salute, And, side by side in labor's free And unresentful rivalry, Harvest the fields wherein they fought.' ' — Petersburg, Va., Oct. 29, iSSj. VI. The McKinley Tariff of 1890. ■ 1 do not intend to enter upon any extended discussion of the two economic systems which divide parties in this House and the people throughout the country. For two years we have been occupied in both branches of Con- ss and in our discussions before the people with these contending theories of taxation. "At the first session of the Fiftieth Con- >s the House spent several weeks in an elaborate -md exhaustive discussion of these systems. The Senate was for as many weeks ed in their investigation and in debate THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 63 upon them, while in the political contest of 1888 the tariff in all its phases was the ab- sorbing question, made so by the political platforms of the respective parties, to the exclusion, practically, of every other subject of party division. It may be said that, from the December session of 1887-88 to March 4, 1889, no public question ever received, in Congress and out, such scrutinizing investiga- tion as that of the tariff. It has, therefore, seemed to me that any lengthy general dis- cussion of these principles at this time, so soon after their thorough consideration and determination by the people, is neither expected, required, nor necessary. " If any one thing was settled by the elec- tion of 1888, it was that the protective policy, as promulgated in the Republican platform and heretofore inaugurated and maintained by the Republican party, should be secured in any fiscal legislation to be had by the Con- gress chosen in that great contest and upon that mastering issue. I have interpreted that victory to mean, and the majority in this House and in the Senate to mean, that a revision of the tariff is not only demanded by the votes of the people, but that such re- vision should be on the line and in full recognition of the principle and purpose of protection. The people have spoken ; they 6a Mckinley's masterpieces. want their will registered and their decree embodied in public legislation. The bill which the Committee on Ways and Means has presented is their answer and interpreta- tion of that victory and in accordance with its spirit and letter and purpose. We have not been compelled to abolish the internal revenue system that we might preserve the protective system, which we were pledged to do in the event that the abolition of the one was essential to the preservation of the other. That was unnecessary. " It is asserted in the views of the minority, submitted with the report accompanying this bill, that the operation of the bill will not diminish the revenues of the Government ; that with the increased duties we have imposed upon foreign articles which may be sent to market here we have increased taxation, and that, therefore, instead of being a diminution of tin- revenues of the Government, there will be an increase in the sum of $50,000,000 or $60,- 000,000. Now, that statement is entirely mis- leading. It can only be accepted upon the assumption that the importation of the present year under this bill, if it becomes a law, will equal to the importations of like articles under the existing law; and there is not a member of the Committee on Ways and Means, there is not a member of the minority THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 65 of that Committee, there is not a member of the House on either side, who does not know that the very instant that you have increased the duties to a fair protective point, putting them above the highest revenue point, that very instant you diminish importations and to that extent diminish the revenue. Nobody can well dispute this proposition. Why, when the Senate bill was under consideration by the Committee on Ways and Means, over which my friend from Texas presided in the last Congress, the distinguished chairman of that committee [Mr. Mills] wrote a letter to Sec- retary Fairchild inquiring what would be the effect of increased duties proposed under the Senate bill, and this is Mr. Fairchild's reply : " 'Where the rates upon articles successfully produced here are materially increased, it is fair to assume that the imports of such articles would decrease and the revenue therefrom diminish.' " He further states that where the rate up- on an article is so increased as to deprive the foreign producer of the power to compete with the domestic producer, the revenue from that source will cease altogether. Secretary Fair- child only states what has been the universal experience in the United States wherever in- crease of duties above the revenue point has been made upon articles which we can pro- 66 m> kinley's masterpieces. i luce in the United States. Therefore, it is safe to assume that no increase of the reve- nues, taking the bill through, will arise from the articles upon which duties have been ad- vanced. Now as to the schedules : •The bill recommends the retention of the present rates of duty on earthen and china- ware. No other industry in the United States either deserves or requires the fostering care of Government more than this one. It is a business requiring technical and artistic knowledge, and the most careful attention to the many and delicate processes through which the raw material must pass to the com- pleted product. For many years, down to 1863, the pottery industry of the United States had very little or no success, and made but slight progress in a practical and com- mercial way. At the close of the low-tariff period of i860, there was but one pottery in the United States, with two small kilns. There were no decorating kilns at the time. In 1S73, encouraged by the tariff and the gold premium, which was an added protection, we had increased to 20 potteries, with 68 kilns, but still no decorating kilns. The capi- ta! invested was $1,020,000, and the value of 1 Ik- product was $1,180,000. In 1882, there were 55 potteries, 244 kilns, 26 decorating kilns, with a capital invested of $5,076,000, THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 67 and an annual product of $5,299,140. The wages paid in the potteries in 1882 were $2,387,000, and the number of employes en- gaged therein 7,000; the ratio of wages to sales, in 1882, was 45 per cent. In 1889, there were 80 potteries, 401 kilns, and deco- rating kilns had increased from 26 in 1822, to 188 in 1889. The capital invested in the latter year was $10,957,357, the value of the product was $10,389,910, amount paid in wages, $6,265,224, and the number of em- ployes engaged, 16,900. The ratio of wages to sales was 60 per cent, of decorated ware and 50 per cent, of white ware. The per cent, of wages to value of product, it will be observed, has advanced from 45 per cent, in 1882, to 60 per cent, in 1889. This increase is not due, as might be supposed, to an ad vance in wages, but results in a reduction in the selling price of the product and the im- mense increase in sales of decorated ware in which labor enters in greater proportion to materials. The total importation for 1874 and 1875 °f earthenware was to the value of $4,441,216, and in 1888 and 1889 it ran up to $6,476,190. The American ware pro- duced in 1889 was valued at $10,389,910. The difference between the wages of labor in this country and competing countries in the manufacture of earthenware is fully 100 per cent. Mckinley's masterpieces. " The agricultural condition of the country has received the careful attention of the com- mittee, and every remedy which was believed to be within the power of tariff legislation to give has been granted by this bill. The de- pression in agriculture is not confined to the United States. The reports of the Agricul- tural Department indicate that this distress is genera] ; that Great Britain, France, and Ger- many are suffering in a larger degree than the farmers of the United States. Mr. Dodge, statistician of the department, says, in his re- port of March, 1890, that the depression in agriculture in Great Britain has probably been more severe than that of any other nation ; which would indicate that it is greater even in a country whose economic system differs from ours, and that this condition is inseparable from any fiscal system, and less under the protective than the revenue tariff system. " It has been asserted in the views of the minority that the duty put upon wheat and other agricultural products would be of no value to the agriculturists of the United States. The committee, believing differently, lias advanced the duty upon these products. A.S we are the greatest wheat - producing country of the world, it is habitually as- serted and believed by many that this prod- in -t is safe from foreign competition. We do THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 69 not appreciate that while the United States last year raised 490,000,000 bushels of wheat, France raised 3 16,000,000 bushels, Italy raised 103,000,000 bushels, Russia 189,000,000 bush- els, and India 243,000,000 bushels, and that the total production of Asia, including Asia Minor, Persia, and Syria, amounted to over 315,000,000 bushels. Our sharpest competi- tion comes from Russia and India, and the increased product of other nations only serves to increase the world's supply, and diminish proportionately the demand for ours; and if we will only reflect on the difference between the cost of labor in producing wheat in the United States and in competing countries, we will readily perceive how near we are to the danger line, if indeed we have not quite reached it, so far even as our own markets are concerned. " Prof. Goldwin Smith, a Canadian and political economist, speaking of the Canadian farmers and the effect of this bill upon their interests, says : " 'They will be very much injured if the McKinley bill shall be adopted. The agricultural schedule will bear very hardly on the Canadian farmers who particu- larly desire to find a market in the United States for their eggs, their barley, and their horses. The Euro- pean market is of little value to them for their horses. If there shall be a slow market in England all the jo Mckinley's masterpieces. pn.tlts will be consumed on a cargo of horses and \ ill entail. I do not see how the Canadian fanners can export their produce to the United States if the McKinley bill shall become a law.' • If that be true, Mr. Chairman, then the annual exports of about $25,000,000 in agri- cultural products will be supplied to the people of the United States by the American fanner rather than by the Canadian farmer; and who will say that $25,000,000 of addi- tional demand for American agricultural products will not inure to the benefit of the American farmer; and that $25,000,000 dis- tributed among our own farmers will not relieve some of the depression now prevailing, and give to the farmer confidence and in- creased ability to lift the mortgages from his lands ? " The duty recommended in the bill is not alone to correct this inequality, but to make the duty on foreign tin plate high enough to insure its manufacture in this country to the extent of our home consumption. The only tson we are not doing it now and have not 11 able to do it in the past is because of inadequate duties. We have demonstrated our ability to make it here as successfully as they do in Wales. We have already made it here. Two factories were engaged in pro- du( ing tin plate in the years 1873, 1874, and THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 7 I 1875, but no sooner had they got fairly under way than the foreign manufacturer reduced his price to a point which made it impossible for our manufacturers to continue. When our people embarked in the business foreign tin plate was selling for $12 per box, and to crush them out, before they were firmly established, the price was brought down to $4.50 per box; but it did not remain there. When the fires were put out in the American mills, and its manufacture thought by the foreigners to be abandoned, the price of tin plate advanced, until in 1879 ft was selling for $9 and $10 a box. Our people again tried it, and again the prices were depressed, and again our people abandoned temporarily the enterprise, and, as a gentleman stated before the committee, twice they have lost their whole investment through the combination of the foreign manufacturers in striking down the prices, not for the benefit of the con- sumer, but to drive our manufacturers from the business ; and this would be followed by an advance within six months after our mills were shut down. " We propose this advanced duty to protect our manufacturers and consumers against the British monopoly, in the belief that it will defend our capital and labor in the production of tin plate until they shall establish an indus- ■j 2 m< kinley's masterpieces. try which the English will recognize has come to stay, and then competition will insure regular and reasonable prices to consumers. It may add a little temporarily to the cost of tin plate to the consumer, but will eventuate in steadier and more satisfactory prices. At the present prices for foreign tin plate, the proposed duty would not add anything to the cost of the heavier grades of tin to the consumer. If the entire duty was added to the cost of the can it would not advance it more than one-third or one-half of one cent, for on a dozen fruit-cans the addition would properly only be about three cents. " Mr. Chairman, gentlemen on the other side take great comfort in a quotation which they make from Daniel Webster. They have thought it so valuable that they have put it in their minority report. It is from a speech made by Mr. Webster in Faneuil Hall in 1820 when he condemned the protective policy. I want to put Daniel Webster in 1846 against Daniel Webster in 1820. Listen to an ex- tract from his speech of July 25, 1846 — the last tariff speech and probably the most elab- orate tariff speech that he ever made in his long public career. He then said : 'But, sir, before I proceed further, I will take notice <-f what appears to be some attempt, latterly, by the republication of opinions and expressions, arguments THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 73 and speeches of mine, at an earlier and a later period of my life, to place me in a position of inconsistency on this subject of the protective policy of the country. Mr. President, if it be an inconsistency to hold an opinion upon a subject of public policy to-day in one state of circumstances, and to hold a different opinion upon the same subject of public policy to-morrow in a different state of circumstances, if that be an incon- sistency, I admit its applicability to myself.' " And then, after discussing the great ben- efits of the protective tariff, he added : "' The interest of every laboring community requires diversity of occupations, pursuits, and objects of in- dustry. The more that diversity is multiplied or ex- tended the better. To diversify employment is to increase employment and to enhance wages. And, sir, take this great truth ; place it on the title-page of every book of political economy intended for the use of the Government ; put if in every farmer's almanac ; let it be the heading of the column in every mechanic's mag- azine; proclaim it everywhere, and make it a proverb, that where there is work for the hands of men there will be work for their teeth. Where there is employ- ment there will be bread. It is a great blessing to the poor to have cheap food, but greater than that, prior to that, and of still higher value, is the blessing of be- ing able to buy food by honest and respectable employment. Employment feeds, and clothes, and instructs. Employment gives health, sobriety, and morals. Constant employment and well - paid labor produce in a country like ours general prosperity, con- tentment, and cheerfulness. Thus happy have we seen the country. Thus happy may we long continue to see it.' - i Mckinley's masterpieces. •• In this happy condition we have seen the country under a protective policy. It is hoped we may long continue to see it, and if he had lived long enough he would have seen the best vindication of his later views. Then he con- tinued, and I commend this especially, in all kindness and with great respect, to the gentle- men of the minority of the committee : " ' I hope I know more of the Constitution of my country than I did when I was twenty years old. •■ ' I hope I have contemplated its great objects more broadly. I hope I have read with deeper interest the sentiments of the great men who framed it. I hope I have studied with more care the condition of the country when the Convension assembled to form it. . . . And now, sir, allow me to say that I am quite indifferent, or rather thankful, to those conductors of the public press who think they cannot do better than now and then to spread my poor opinions before the public. 1 u What is the nature of the complaint against this bill- -that it shuts us out of the foreign market? No, for whatever that is worth to our ( Itizens will be just as accessible under this bill as under the present law. We place no lax or burden or restraint upon American products going out of the country. They are as free to seek the best markets as the prod- in is of any commercial power, and as free to >u1 .is though we had absolute free trade. THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 75 Statistics show that protective tariffs have not interrupted our export trade, but that it has always steadily and largely increased under them. " In the year 1843, being the first year after the protective tariff of 1842 went into opera- tion, our exports exceeded our imports $40,- 392,229, and in the following year they ex- ceeded our imports $3,141,226. In the two years following the excess of exports over imports was $15,475,000. The last year under that tariff the excess of exports over imports was $34,317,249. So during the five years of the tariff of 1842 the excess of ex- ports over imports was $62,175,000. Under the low tariff of 1846, this was reversed, and, with the single exception of the year 1858, the imports exceeded the exports (covering a period of fourteen years) $465,553,625. " We have now enjoyed twenty-nine years continuously of protective tariff laws — the longest uninterrupted period in which that policy has prevailed since the formation of the Federal Government - - and we find ourselves at the end of that period in a condition of independence and prosperity the like of which has never been witnessed at any other period in the history of our country, and the like of which has no parallel in the recorded history of the world. In all that goes to make a 7 6 Mckinley's masterpieces. nation great and strong and independent we have made extraordinary strides. In arts, in science, in literature, in manufactures, in invention, in scientific principles applied to manufacture and agriculture, in wealth and credit and national honor we are at the very front, abreast with the best, and behind none. "In i860, after fourteen years of a revenue tariff, just the kind of a tariff that our political adversaries are advocating to-day, the business of the country was prostrated, agriculture was deplorably depressed, manu- facturing was on the decline, and the poverty of the Government itself made this nation a byword in the financial centres of the world. We neither had money nor credit. Both are essential ; a nation can get on if it has abundant revenues, but if it has none it must have credit. We had neither, as the legacy of the Democratic revenue tariff. We have both now. We have a surplus revenue and a spotless credit. I need not state what is so fresh in our minds, so recent in our his- tory as to be known to every gentleman who hears me, that from the inauguration of the protective tariff laws of 1861, the old Morrill tariff- which has brought to that veteran statesman the highest honor, and will give to him his proudest monument- - this condition THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 77 changed. Confidence was restored, courage was inspired, the Government started upon a progressive era under a system thoroughly American. " With a great war on our hands, with an army to enlist and prepare for service, with untold millions of money to supply, the pro tective tariff never failed us in a single emergency, and while money was flowing into our treasury to save the Government, indus- tries were springing up all over the land — the foundation and corner-stone of our pros- perity and glory. With a debt of over $2,750,000,000 when the war terminated, holding on to our protective laws, against Democratic opposition, we have reduced that debt at an average rate of more than $62,000,000 each year, $174,000 every twenty-four hours for the last twenty -five years, and what looked to be a burden almost impossible to bear has been removed, under the Republican fiscal system, until now it is less than $1,000,000,000, and with the pay- ment of this vast sum of money the nation has not been impoverished. The individual citizen has not been burdened or bankrupted. National and individual prosperity have gone steadily on, until our wealth is so great as to be almost incomprehensible when put into figures. 78 Mckinley's masterpieces. "First, then, to retain our own market, under the Democratic system of raising rev- enue by removing all protection, would re- quire our producers to sell at as low a price and upon as favorable terms as our foreign competitors. How could that be done ? In one way only — by producing as cheaply as those who would seek our markets. What would that entail? An entire revolution in the methods and condition and conduct of business here, a leveling down through every channel, to the lowest line of our competitors ; our habits of living would have to be changed, our wages cut down fifty per cent, more, our comfortable homes exchanged for hovels, our independence yielded up, our citizenship de- moralized. These are conditions inseparable to free trade ; these would be necessary if we would command our own market among our own people; and if we would invade the world's markets, harsher conditions and greater sacrifices would be demanded of the masses. Talk about depression — we would then have it in its fulness. We would revel in unrestrained trade. Everything would, in- deed, be cheap, but how costly when meas- ured by the degradation which would ensue ! When merchandise is the cheapest, men are the poorest, and the most distressing experi- ences in the history of our country — aye, in THE PROTECTIVE TARIFF. 79 all human history — have been when every- thing was the lowest and cheapest, measured by gold, for everything was the highest and the dearest, measured by labor. We want no return of cheap times in our own country. We have no wish to adopt the conditions of other nations. Experience has demonstrated that for us and ours, and for the present and the future, the protective system meets our wants, our conditions, promotes the national design, and will work out our destiny better than any other. " With me, this position is a deep conviction, not a theory. I believe in it and thus warmly advocate it because enveloped in it are my country's highest development and greatest prosperity ; out of it come the greatest gains to the people, the greatest comforts to the masses, the widest encouragement for manly aspirations, with the largest rewards, dignify- ing and elevating our citizenship, upon which the safety, and purity, and permanency of our political system depend." —House of Rep- resentatives, May 7, i8go. CHAPTER III. THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. At the foundation of a republican government rests a pure, intelligent, and untramelled ballot. This has always been McKinley's idea, and while depre- cating any survival of sectional animosities, he rigidly insists that the free ballot of the Constitution shall be guaranteed to the nation's humblest citizens. I. The War Is Over. "The war is over, the flag of the lost and wicked cause went down at Appomattox more than twenty years ago ; but that does not pre- vent us from insisting that all that was gained in war shall not be lost in peace. The con- test is over — we pray never to be resumed ; but that which was secured by so much blood, suffering, and sacrifice must be cheerfully ac- corded by every patriotic citizen. The strug- gle cost too much human life and public treasure to be apologized for, or frittered away, under any pretext. The results admit of no compromise. The standard of patri- otism and the respect for law must not be lowered; the hideous spectre of a wicked conspiracy need not be veiled. Patriotism 80 THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 8 1 and obedience to the Constitution, the old as well as the new, must be kept to the forefront. Weak and sentimental gush must not be per- mitted to conceal disobedience of the law, or protect the flagrant violators of the rights of citizenship. The country's enemies were for- given long ago, liberal and magnanimous pardon was extended to them. Mutual for- bearance should be cultivated, honorable con- cessions were made upon both sides, but the freedom and political equality of all men must be fully and honorably recognized wher- ever our Hag floats." Campaign speech at I ronton, O., Oct. /, J 885. II. The Black Color-bearer. " Our black allies must neither be deserted nor forsaken. Every right secured them by the Constitution must be as surely given to them as though God had put upon their faces the color of the Anglo-Saxon race. They fought for the flag in the war, and that flag, with all it represents and stands for, must secure them every constitutional right in peace. At Baton Rouge, the first regiment of the Black Brigade, before starting for Port Hudson, received at the hands of its white colonel — Colonel Stafford — its regimental 82 Mckinley's masterpieces. colors in a speech from the colonel, which ended with this injunction : " ' Color-bearer, guard, defend, protect, die for, but do not surrender, these colors.' "To which the sergeant replied — and he was as black as my coat : "'Colonel, I'll return those flags to you in honor, or I'll report to God the reason why.' " He fell mortally wounded, in one of the desperate charges in front of Port Hudson, with his face to the enemy, with those colors in his clenched fist pressed upon his breast. He did not return the colors, but the God above him knew the reason why. "Against those who fought on the other side in that great conflict we have no resent- ment; for them we have no bitterness. We would impose upon them no punishment ; we would inflict upon them no indignity. They are our brothers. We would save them even from humiliation. But I will tell you what we insist upon, and we will insist upon it until it is secured — that the settlement made be- tween Grant and Lee at Appomattox, which was afterward embodied in the Constitution of the United States, shall be obeyed and respected in every part of this Union. More we have never asked, less we will not have." — New York, " The American Volunteer Soldier," May jo, i88g. THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 83 III. Fair Elections. "Mr. Chair mcui: — The first movement in the programme of a restored Democracy has already been accomplished, so far as this House is concerned, in the paralyzation of the executive force to preserve peace at the polls. The second step in the same pro- gramme is only checked by a few intervening days, when the purity of the ballot-box is to be submitted to the same lawlessness, with no power in the Federal head to insure or pre- serve it. "The proposition offered by Mr. Southard in the closing hours of the Forty-fifth Con- gress, and for the most part now renewed in the extraordinary session of the present Con- gress, to repeal certain sections of the statutes of the United States known as the Federal election laws, is a bold and wanton attempt to wipe from the law all protection of the ballot-box, and surrender its purity to the unholy hand of the hired repeater, and its control to the ballot-box stuffers of the great cities of the North and the tissue-ballot party of the South. " So determined is the Democratic party in the House to break down these wise and just measures, intended to secure an honest ballot to the legal voter, that they make them a rider 84 Mckinley's masterpieces. to an important appropriation bill, making them, in the language of my colleague [Mr. McMahon]; ' a necessary companion to the money voted in the bill' " The repeal of these laws will remove every safeguard against fraud in the exerci.M of the elective franchise, and will again make possible the enormous outrages upon a pure ballot and free government which marked the elections in the city of New York and else- where in 1868, the wickedness and extent of which made existing laws necessary and imperative. The proposition we are now considering is an open assault upon the free- dom and purity of elections. "Article I. of the Constitution declares : "'The times, places, and manner of holding elec- tions for Senators and Representatives shall 1 »t_- prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof: but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places <>f choosing Senators. ' " This constitutional provision confers upon Congress full and adequate power at any time to make or alter times, places, and manner of holding elections for Representatives, and to make or alter such regulations. " The Democratic party has thus abandoned the constitutional objection by allowing the sections in relation to supervisors of elections, I UK PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 85 with some limitations, to remain. They sur- render the constitutional doctrine so strenu- ously urged against existing law. My distinguished friend from Ohio [Mr. Hurd], and the gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Carlisle], who addressed the Committee yesterday, seem not to have been present at the lasl caucus of their party, for their argu- ments are wholly based upon the constitutional question. Let me suggest to my friends that if the law is unconstitutional the courts are open to them, where that question can be judicially determined for all time ; and let me remind them that this law has been on the statute-book for now seven years, and the question they make, although decided ad- versely to their theory by an inferior court, has never found its way to the final tribunal in such eases — the Supreme Court of the United States. To that tribunal we invite them to go. I repeat, that permitting the supervisors' law to stand is a giving away of all constitutional objection to the entire body of the law. It explodes the old dogma of State rights, and removes all necessity for any discussion upon that point. " Enough of the law is left to recognize the principle always contended for by the Repub- lican party, that Congress had the power and that it was its plain duty to guard and protect Mckinley's masterpieces. elections where its own members were to be chosen to seats in this body ; but while admit- ting the constitutional right, they are careful to wipe out all the provisions which give such a law practical effect in securing an honest election and preventing force and fraud at the polls. They are in favor of the law, but opposed to its execution. * # =* # * " I have tried fairly to meet and answer the principal objections urged to this law. Are there any others ? In the discussion had in the Forty -fifth Congress much stress was placed upon the great expense attending the execution of the law. I learn that at Cincin- nati, in my own State, the expense of deputy marshals, in 1878, was less than $400, and they never had a fairer, purer election than at that time. But to this, in general terms, I answer, What signifies the cost, if thereby we can secure a free and fair ballot in this coun- try ? Who will count the cost, if the enforce- ment of this law will prevent the repeaters and moonshiners from controlling the elections and subverting the popular will ? For in- volved in this proposition is the existence of the Republic and the perpetuation of republi- can institutions. If honest, fair elections can not be had, free government is a farce; it is ii'» longer the popular will which is supreme. THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 87 Free government can not be estimated by dollars nor measured by cost. We have long ago discarded that consideration. This ob- jection has been urged many times before to the enforcement of great fundamental doctrines and principles. The same objection was urged to the prosecution of the war for the preserva- tion of the Union and free government. Public sentiment did not listen then to the cry of cost ; it hesitated not, it faltered not then ; it ignored the cost ; it fought and successfully fought the great battle of freedom ; and public sentiment will not now pause to count the paltry cost, when free and fair elections, the foundation-stone of free government, are in- volved in the threatened danger. If I do not misjudge, the people who fought for free gov- ernment and maintained it at so great a cost will now be found firm and invincible for a free ballot and fair elections. Let me remind the other side of this Chamber that supervisors and marshals will not be needed, and therefore no cost will be incurred, whenever the party which employs tissue ballots and drives colored citizens from the polls shall do so no more forever, and whenever Democratic re- peaters shall cease to corrupt the ballot — the great fountain of power in this country ; in a single sentence, whenever, throughout this whole country, in every State thereof, citizen- 88 mckinley's masterpieces. ship is respected and the rights under it are fully and amply secured ; when every citizen who is entitled to vote shall be secure in the free exercise of that right, and the ballot-box shall be protected from illegal voters, from fraud and violence, Federal supervisors of Federal elections will be neither expensive nor oppressive. " Has any legal voter in the United States been prevented from exercising his right of suffrage by this law, or by the officers acting under it ? This is the practical question. None that I have ever heard of ; while thou- sands, yes, tens of thousands of illegal voters have been deterred from voting by virtue of it. The honest voter has no fear of this law ; it touches him as lightly as the law of larceny touches the honest man, or the law of murder touches him whose hands are stainless of human blood. The thief hates the law of larceny, the murderer the law of homicide. They, too, can truthfully urge the cost of the execution of these laws; both are expensive and onerous to the taxpayer. But I have never known such arguments seriously enter- tained as a reason for their repeal. The law is without terror save to wrong-doers. The presence of officers of the law only deters criminals from the commission of crime. They are no restraint upon the honest man. THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 89 You can form no system of laws which will not be open to some criticism and abuse. These prove nothing against the importance and necessity of their maintenance. If any better method can be offered for preserving the ballot-box in its purity, I will cordially accept it and labor for its passage, but until such better method is proposed we should stand by existing statutes. "We can not afford to break down a single safeguard which has been thrown around the ballot-box. Every guarantee must be kept and maintained. Fair-minded people every- where are interested in honest elections. It is not a partizan measure; it falls alike upon all political parties. The law recognizes no political creed, and those who execute it should carefully obey its letter and spirit. It protects Democrats and Republicans and men of all parties alike. "This House, not content with prohibiting the use of soldiers to keep the peace at the polls, forbidding their employment by the President in any emergency, however grave, now seeks to remove every remaining safe- guard to a fair and honest election. The better sentiment of the country, North and South, will not submit to such unbridled license upon the ballot-box. Mr. Chairman, what will the end be ? By an amendment to go m.kinley's masterpieces. an army appropriation bill which was not connected with the subject matter thereof, peace at the polls can no longer be main- tained by the Chief Executive, no matter how grave the emergency nor how pressing the necessity. Tumult and riot may hold high carnival at a Federal polling place, and the Federal arm is powerless to restrain it. This restriction of Federal power, this paralyzation of executive authority, ought to have satisfied the most extreme State rights Democrat ; but not so. Having forbidden the use of the ex- ecutive force to keep the peace at the polls, they now demand that the purity of the ballot and the freedom of the voter shall be subjected to the same lawlessness, with no power in the Government to restrain it. "Mr. Chairman, my purpose thus far has been to present this law, the repeal of which is demanded, upon its merits wholly. The proposition, however, of the Democratic side of the House is to offer this amendment, not to the sober, independent judgment of the House and the co-ordinate branches of the Government, but to rush it through, right or wrong, justly or unjustly, as a part of a bill making appropriations for the pressing and needful wants of the Government. It is an attempt to do by force what ought to be clone, il at all, in the free exercise of the law-making THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 9 1 power by each branch of the Government acting in its proper functions under the Con- stitution. If force and coercion be not in- tended, then why not introduce and consider this legislation under the rules, with delibera- tion, and debate upon its own merits, inde- pendent and separate from an appropriation bill ? This is the ordinary course of legisla- tion, recognized by long practice, founded in wisdom, and never before abandoned for the purposes of coercion. Want of time can not be urged in favor of this course ; clays of idleness have already been spent sufficient for the purpose. The resort to this method of legislation is a confession of the injustice, wrong, and weakness of the proposed measure, and evinces a determination to accomplish wrongfully that which can not be rightfully accomplished. One of the pretexts urged in favor of placing this amendment upon an appropriation bill is that the law itself was passed by the Republicans in the same way. This impression has become so general throughout the country that it would seem necessary to state the facts in relation to the passage of the Supervisors' law. The law, substantially as it is now in the statutes, was introduced into the House, referred to the Judiciary Committee, considered by that Committee, and reported back to the House 9? Mckinley s masterpieces. by its chairman, where it was discussed, voted upon, and passed entirely independent of any appropriation bill. It took the same course in the Senate. It was not a rider to a bill appropriating money. It is true that the sections extending the supervisors to county districts and restricting their powers in such districts were passed June 10, 1872, upon the Sundry Civil Appropriation Bill. "The first fruits of their dominion are not assuring to the country, and will not, I am certain, incline the people to clothe them with still greater power. Threatened revolution will not hasten it ; extra sessions, useless and expensive, will not accelerate it. Threat and menace, disturbing the business interests of the country, will only retard it. It will come when your party have shown that you deserve it. When you have demonstrated that the financial, industrial, and business interests of the nation are safer and wiser in your hands than in any other, and, more than all, when you have demonstrated that free government will not perish in your keeping, it will come then, and not before. I hope, Mr. Chairman, this amendment will not be insisted upon. It is wrong in itself; it endangers free govern- ment. [ believe the method proposed under the circumstances I have already designated is revolutionary. There is no necessity for THE PURITY OF THE BALLOT. 93 such haste. The law can have no force and effect until 1880, except in the State of Cali- fornia. If the amendment must be passed, let it come in the ordinary course of legisla- tion. There will be ample time at the regular session next winter, and before any other Federal elections will be held. " The country is not asking for it. Business will suffer and is suffering every day from the agitation of a continued extra session of Con- gress. Uncertainty in legislation is a terror to all business and commercial interests, and this uncertainty exists and will continue so long as we remain in session. Let us remove it. Let us pass the appropriation bills, simple and pure. Let us keep the Executive Depart- ment in motion. Let the courts of the United States go on and clear up their already over- crowded dockets. Let the representatives of the Government abroad, upon whom our com- mercial relations with other nations so largely depend, be not crippled. Give the pensioners of the Government their well-earned and much -needed pensions. Let the Army be clothed, provisioned, and paid. Do this, striking out all political amendments from the appropriation bills, adjourn speedily, and give the country that peace and rest which will be promotive of the public good. When we have done this we have evidenced the 94 Mckinley's masterpieces. wisdom of statesmen and the work of patriots. [Great applause on the Republican side.] Let the people then, the final arbiter, the source of all power, decide the issue between us." — House of Representatives, April 18, i&jg. CHAPTER IV. FINANCE. The two selections here presented on finance are not voluminous, but they tell the whole story. In the tirst McKinley arraigns the Democratic financial policy, and in the second states his views concerning silver. No clearer exposition could have been made, or one more consistently Republican. I. The Purchase of Government Bonds. "And I charge here to-day that the Presi- dent of the United States and his adminis- tration are solely responsible for whatever congested condition we have in the Treasury and whatever alarm prevails about the finances of the country. Every dollar of it would have paid a dollar of the Government debts if the Secretary had exercised wisely the discretion given him by law. His way might have been justifiable if there had been no other means of putting the surplus money in circulation. He may lecture that side of the House as much as he will — doubtless they deserve it — but he can not avoid or evade the responsibility that rests on him. What does a man do who has a surplus 95 96 Mckinley's masterpieces. balance in the banks and has outstanding debts bearing interest? He calls in the evi- dence of those debts and pays them off with his surplus deposit. That is what a business man would have done ; that is what a busi- ness administration would have done ; and we would have had $50,000,000 less of inter- est-bearing bonds in circulation to-day if the President had followed the way blazed for him by the Republican party. "Well, now, I wonder, Mr, Chairman, if there was any ulterior motive in piling up this surplus ? I wonder if it was not for the purpose of creating a condition of things in the country which would get up a scare and stampede the country against the protective system ? I wonder if this was not just what was in the mind of the President : ' I will pile up this money in the Treasury, $65,000,000 of it, and then I will tell Congress that the country will be filled with widespread disaster and financial ruin if it does not reduce the tariff duties ? ' If the President thought that he was going to get up a storm of indignation and recruit the free-trade army, break down the American system of protection, and put the free traders on top, he has probably dis- covered his blunder by this time ; and the best evidence of it is that he now wants the very law which he has so long discredited FINANCE. 97 solemnly re-enacted, as if it were new and original with him ; and so, having failed, he comes here through his Secretary of the Treasury - - and I hope, Mr. Chairman, that the gentleman from Texas will read the letter of the Secretary upon this subject - - he comes here through his Secretary and asks us to pass this bill, which is a duplicate of exist- ing law. II. The Silver Bill. " Mr. Speaker: - - It seems to me that the sub- ject now under consideration is grave enough in every aspect to cause us, even at this last moment of the discussion, to pause and thoughtfully consider whether by our votes here to-day we shall reverse the well - estab- lished financial policy of the country. From 1793 to 1873 we had the free and unlimited coinage of silver in the United States, the two metals fluctuating in value from time to time, rarely if ever at a parity, sometimes so vary- ing and unequal that the President of the United States was compelled to suspend the coinage of the silver dollar — a rule made by Jefferson in 1805 and followed for thirty years afterward. What we are considering here to-day, and what we have been considering almost without interruption for the last ten days, has been only the struggle of the cen- 98 Mckinley's masterpieces. tury which has vexed the statesmen of all periods of our history, and that struggle has been to preserve the concurrent circulation of gold and silver, each on a parity with the other. And we have never been able to do it until now. At no time in the history of the United States have gold and silver so circu- lated side by side, in equal volume, as gold and silver have circulated concurrently since 1878. " I believe, Mr. Speaker, that we should preserve these two moneys side by side. And it is because I want to preserve these equal standards of value that I have opposed and shall oppose concurrence in the Senate amendments. I do not want gold at a pre- mium, I do not want silver at a discount, or vice versa, but I want both metals side by side, equal in purchasing power and in legal-tender quality, equal in power to perform the func- tions of money with which to do the business and move the commerce of the United States. To tell me that the free and unlimited coinage of the world, in the absence of cooperation on the part of other commercial nations, will not bring gold to a premium, is to deny all history and the weight of all financial experience. The very instant that you have opened up our mints to the silver bullion of the world inde- pendently of international action, that very FINANCE. 99 instant, or in a brief time at best, you have sent gold to a premium ; and when you have sent gold to a premium, then you have put it in great measure into disuse, and we are remitted to the single standard, that of silver alone ; we have deprived ourselves of the active use of both metals. It is only because of the safe and conservative financial policy of the Republican party, aided by the con- servative men of both parties, which has more than once received the approval of the coun- try, that since 1878 by our legislation we have compelled gold and silver to work together upon an equality, both employed as safe means of exchange in the business of our country. Let the bullion of the world come into this market from Europe and Asia, and then, whether gold flows out of this country or not, it flows out of the channels of business and the avenues of trade, and we are in danger of being driven to the use of silver alone. I oppose the Senate amendments because I want the use of both silver and gold. The gentlemen who favor the amend- ments of the Senate want silver to do the work alone, to be the sole agency of our exchanges. " Those of 'us who believe in conservative legislation want to utilize both metals and make both respond to the wants of trade. ioo Mckinley's masterpieces. They talk about silver being cheap money. And gentlemen no longer conceal, on that side and on this, that the reason they want silver is because it is cheap. I am not attracted by the word 'cheap,' whether applied to nations or to men, or whether it is applied to money. Whatever dollars we have in this country must be good dollars, as good in the hands of the poor as the rich ; equal dollars, equal in inherent merit, equal in purchasing power, whether they be paper dollars, or gold dollars, or silver dollars, or Treasury notes --each convertible into the other and each exchange- able for the other, because each is based upon equal value, and has behind it equal security ; good, not by the fiat of law alone, but good because the whole commercial world recognizes its inherent and inextin- guishable value. There should be no specu- lative features in our money, no opportunity for speculation in the exchanges of the people. They must be safe and stable. And I stand here to-day, speaking not for a single section, but for my country and for the whole country. I say that it is for the highest and best in- terests of all that, whatever money we have, it must be based upon both gold and silver, and represent the best money in the world." — House of Representatives, June 25, 18 go. CHAPTER V. THE INTERESTS OF LABOR. McKinley belongs to the common people. A son of sturdy, industrious parents of limited means, he has worked his own way over the successive rounds of effort to the eminence he now enjoys. He never forgets those who toil, and with the great American masses, in their aspirations for better things, his heart beats in warmest sympathy. I. Multum in Parvo. " We are a nation of working people. We glory in the fact that in the dignity and eleva- tion of labor we find our greatest distinction among the nations of earth." — Chicago, July 4, 1895. " If I were called upon to say what, in my opinion, constitutes the strength, security, and integrity of our Government, I would say the American home. It lies at the beginning; it is the foundation of a pure national life. The good home makes the good citizen, the good citizen makes wholesome public sentiment, and good government necessarily follows." — Cincinnati, O., Labor Day, Sept. 1, 1891. 101 102 Mckinley's masterpieces. "When we constitute eight hours a day's work, instead of ten hours, every four days give an additional day's work to some work- ingman who may not have any employment at all. It is one more day's work, one more day's wages, one more opportunity for work and wages, an increased demand for labor. Therefore, I am in favor of this bill." -House of Representatives, Fifty-first Congress, August 28, i8qo. II. The American Workingman. "The ideals of yesterday are the truths of to-day. What we hope for and aspire to now we will realize in the future if we are prudent and careful. If right is on our side, and we pursue resolute but orderly methods to secure our end, it is sure to come. There is no better way of securing what we want, and what we believe is best for us and those for whom we have a care, than the old way of striving earnestly and honestly for it. The labor of the country constitutes its strength and its wealth, and the better that labor is conditioned, the higher its rewards, the wider its opportunities, and the greater its comforts and refinements, the better will be our civili- zation, the more sacred will be our homes, the more capable our children, and the nobler will THE INTERESTS OF LABOR. 1 03 be the destiny which awaits us. We can only walk in the path of right, resolutely insisting on the right, always being sure at the same time that we are right ourselves, and time will bring the victories. To labor is accorded its full share of the advantages of a government like ours. None more than the laborers en- joy the benefits and blessings which our free institutions make. This country differs in many and essential respects from other coun- tries, and, as is often said, it is just this dif- ference which makes us the best of all. It is the difference between our political equality and the caste conditions of other nations which elevates and enlightens the American laborer, and inspires within him a feeling of pride and manhood. It is the difference in recompense received by him for his labor and that re- ceived by the foreigner which enables him to acquire for himself and his a cheery home and the comforts of life. It is the difference between our educational facilities and the less liberal opportunities for learning in other lands which vouchsafes to him the priceless privilege of rearing a happy, intelligent, and God - fearing family. The great Matthew Arnold has truly said, ' America holds the future.' It is in commemoration of the achievements of labor in the past that Labor Day was established. It was eminently fitting 104 Mckinley's masterpieces. that the people should turn aside on one day of the year from their usual vocation and re- joice together over the unequaled prosperity that has been vouchsafed to them. The triumphs of American labor can not easily be recited nor its trophies enumerated. But, great as they have been in the past, I am fully convinced that there are richer rewards in store for labor in the future." — Cincinnati, O., Sept. /, i8gi. III. The Eight-hour Law. "Mr. Speaker: — I am in favor of this bill. It has been said that it is a bill to limit the opportunity of the workingman to gain a live- lihood. This is not true ; it will have the op- posite effect. So far as the Government of the United States as an employer is concerned, in the limitation for a day's work provided in this bill to eight hours, instead of putting any limitation upon the opportunity of the Ameri- can freeman to earn a living, it increases and enlarges his opportunity. Eight hours under the laws of the United States constitute a day's work. That law has been on our statute- books for twenty-two years. In all these years it has been ' the word of promise to the ear,' but by the Government of the United States it has been ' broken to the hope.' The Gov- THE INTERESTS OF LABOR. 1 05 ernment and its officials should be swift to execute and enforce its own laws ; failure in this particular is most reprehensible. Now, it must be remembered that when we constitute eight hours a day's work, instead of ten hours, every four days give an additional day's work to some workingman who may not have any employment at all. It is one more day's work, one more day's wages, one more opportunity for work and wages, an increased demand for labor. I am in favor of this bill as it is amended by the motion of the gentleman from Maryland. It applies now only to the labor of men's hands. It applies only to their work. It does not apply to material, it does not apply to transportation. It only applies to the actual labor, skilled or unskilled, em- ployed on public works and in the execution of the contracts of the Government. And the Government of the United States ought, finally and in good faith, to set this example of eight hours as constituting a clay's work re- quired of laboring men in the service of the United States. The tendency of the times the world over is for shorter hours for labor, shorter hours in the interest of health, shorter hours in the interest of humanity, shorter hours in the interest of the home and the family; and the United States can do no better ser- vice to labor and to its own citizens than to io6 Mckinley's masterpieces. set the example to States, to corporations and to individuals employing men by declaring that, so far as the Government is concerned, eight hours shall constitute a day's work, and be all that is required of its laboring force. This bill should be passed. My colleague, Mr. Morey, has stated what we owe the family in this connection, and Cardinal Manning, in a recent article, spoke noble words on the general subject when he said : " ' But if the domestic life of the people be vital above all, if the peace, the purity of homes, the education of children, the duties of wives and mothers, the duties of husbands and of fathers be written in the natural law of mankind, and if these things are sacred, far beyond anything that can be sold in the market, then I say, if the hours of labor re- sulting from the unregulated sale of a man's strength and skill shall lead to the destruction of domestic life, to the neglect of children, to turning wives and mothers into living ma- chines, and of fathers and husbands into- what shall I say, creatures of burden? — I will not say any other word — who rise up be- fore the sun, and come back when it is set, wearied and able only to take food and lie down to rest, the domestic life of men exists do longer, and we dare not go on in this path.' THE INTERESTS OF LABOR. 107 " We owe something to the care, the eleva- tion, the dignity, and the education of labor. We owe something to the workingmen and the families of the workingmen throughout the United States, who constitute the large body of our population, and this bill is a step in the right direction." — House of Representatives. August 28, iSgo. CHAPTER VI. EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. Although McKinley's own education was not extensive, no man appreciates better than he the ad- vantages of learning and the delights of culture. The true meaning of these things he rightly estimates. Education is an American hobby. So is it a hobby of McKinley. I. In a Nut-shell. " An open schoolhouse, free to all, evi- dences the highest type of advanced civiliza- tion. It is the gateway to progress, prosperity, and honor — the best security for the liberties and independence of the people. It is better than garrisons and guns, than forts and fleets. An educated people governed by true, moral principles, can never take a backward step, nor be dispossessed of their citizenship or liberties." - - Canal Fulton, O., August jo, 1887. II. Our Public Schools. " One thing essential to ' getting on in the world' is to have a purpose. Life without it will prove a failure, and all your efforts barren 108 EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. 109 of results. Drifting will not do. You must have a port in view, from which storms and tempests, while they may divert your course for the time, can only delay, not defeat, your ultimate landing. Seek the calling to which you seem best adapted, and then do not expect too large results. Every legitimate calling is honorable, if we make it so, and leads to honor. Every young man should not enter what is called the 'learned profes- sions,' for all are not fitted to prosecute them successfully. The avenues to useful employ- ment, just as honorable and lucrative, are open upon every hand. The ' learned profes- sions ' are no longer the exclusive stepping- stones to official honor and the State's highest trusts. I would rather be able to shovel sand well than be a blundering doctor, a pettifog- ging lawyer, or an unsuccessful preacher, whom no congregation would welcome. It is far better to be at the head of any honor- able occupation, however lowly, than to be at the foot of the highest, no matter how exalted. Go at that which will secure you the front rank and give you a place in the front row. The rear rank and the back seat are doubtless indispensable in the march of mankind, but let the man occupy them who can do no better. " Public instruction wields a power vast no Mckinley's masterpieces. and far-reaching in its results. It was true, as the military attache wrote to his master, the lesser Napoleon, that ' the schoolmaster, not the needle-gun, triumphed at Sadowa. Knowledge, ideas, convictions, guided by a good conscience, win more battles for man- kind than bullet or shell. Prussia was regen- erated, under the lead of Von Hardenberg and Von Stein, by the system of common - school education. In the United States, education has always been the national instinct ; an enlightened citizenship is now, as ever before, the hope of the Republic. Our country owes much, immeasurably more than aught else, to her educational system, and we must appreciate more and more, as her growth continues and her power increases, that the hope of the Republic is in an educated and enlightened citizenship, which fears God and walks uprightly. I congratulate you upon the completion of this imposing structure, and still more upon the grand uses to which it is dedicated." — Dedication of Public School, Canal Fulton, Ohio, August jo, 1887. [Copy- right.'] III. From the History of Oberlin College. "In the winter of 183 4^3 5, Oberlin Col- lege was the first to admit colored students. EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. Ill This was a mighty and majestic step forward, and it was never retraced. It favored, from its beginning, coeducation. It occupied the very outpost of liberty ; it has remained al- ways upon the skirmish line. It is said that, in 1840, one of the young students of the university said to Father Keep, 'When will slavery be abolished ? ' He answered, with the confidence born of his own faith and cour- age, ' In about twenty years ; ' and that which for so long was only hope and prayer became performance and fulfilment almost within the prophecy of the venerable teacher. The in- stitution was dedicated by its founders not only to the most liberal education, which should include both sexes, all classes, and all races, but was consecrated to liberty and equality among men. These great funda mental ideas have never been for a moment lost sight of since. They have been adhered to in trial and triumph. What influence Oberlin College has had upon the Republic and its citizenship and institutions, no man can tell. It hated slavery, and proclaimed it defiantly. No slave was ever returned from its corporation into bondage, and no slave ever came within its gates who was not wel- comed and protected. The case of John Price, the colored boy, who was seized by the United States officers and rescued by the cicizens I ii2 Mckinley's masterpieces. of Oberlin, is now almost forgotten history. That was in 1858, and the whole authority of the General Government was enlisted for the return of that boy to slavery, and yet, in less than five years, the spirit of Oberlin spread throughout the North. Then came the proc- lamation of Abraham Lincoln that made all slaves free, free to go to every corner of the country within the jurisdiction of the flag. They were earnest, God - fearing men who built your great university ; built it, not alone for themselves and their immediate descend- ants, but for posterity. " The students of Oberlin College were some of the pioneers in the early struggles to make Kansas a free State. They went wher- ever freedom was assailed ; they literally flocked to that Territory which the South had said should be dedicated to slavery. Their teachers and their preachers went forth from your institution to teach the truth and justice of the Declaration of Independence. Your pupils were in every department of the Army. No more patriotic community existed any- where in the United States than Oberlin. Your first contribution was a company to the old historic Seventh Ohio, which Captain Shurtleff, one of your professors, commanded. You made contributions to other regiments and to other arms of the service, and every EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. 113 boy or man who went from your institution understood exactly what he was fighting for. Every shot he fired was directed by conscience and for freedom. He fought not only for the Union as it was, but the Union as it is, with slavery destroyed and freedom nationalized. I have read somewhere that my old friend, Professor Monroe, with whom I served so many years in Congress, a man of peace and opposed to contention, really made the first war speech that was ever made in your village, and made it in the old First Church, urging the boys to go forth and fight the battles of their country, and that it was his earnest ap- peal that led to the organization of the first company that went from the walls of your institution. It was from your institution Gen- eral Cox, the distinguished soldier and states- man, went forth, who became a Major-General, and was the first brigade commander under whom I served. Hosts of others are promi- nent in business, in education, in the pulpit, in literature and in science. The old names should be dear to the alumni and friends of the institution : Asa Mahan, John Jay Ship- herd, Stewart, Shepard, Waldo, Dascomb, Finney, Dr. John Morgan, Rev. Henry and John P. Cowles, with many others, contem- poraries and successors. These names should not only be remembered and honored at your ii4 Mckinley's masterpieces. reunions, but should be dearly cherished by you and by the friends of freedom every- where. I want to congratulate you all on your achievements, and I join with all in urging that a fund be raised to enable this distinguished professor to carry on his work. Do not give up your peculiarities. They are excellences peculiar to your own institution. Stick to them ! " — Annual dinner of Cleveland Alumni, Cleveland, Ohio, March j, 1892. [Copyright.] IV. Education and Citizenship. " Mr. President, Members of the Faculty and Students of the Ohio State University, and Fel- low Citizens : — The Prussian maxim, ' What- ever you would have appear in the life of a nation, you must put into your schools,' I would amend : ' What you would have appear in the life of a nation, you must put into your homes and schools.' The beginning of edu- cation is in the home, and the great advantage of the American system of instruction is largely due to the elevated influences of the happy and prosperous homes of our people. There is the foundation, and a most impor- tant part of education. If the home life be pure, sincere, and good, the child is usually well prepared to receive all the advantages EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. 115 and inspirations of more advanced education. The American home, where honesty, sobriety, and truth preside, and the simple every-day virtues are practised, is the nursery of true education. Out of such homes usually come the men and women who make our citizenship pure and elevating, and the State and nation strong and enduring. " It is unfortunate that the great National University which Washington so strenuously advocated was not long ago established, with an endowment commensurate with the dignity and importance of our Government, to which all the universities of all the States would be auxiliary institutions and tributary in the same degree that our public schools are be- coming more and more training-schools for the State universities. To my mind the need of such a university is as essential to-day for the welfare of the Republic as the most en- lightened and progressive nation of the world as it was in the days of our first greatest President. His great character and broad comprehension not only dominated the age in which he lived, but his advice may yet be followed to the great advantage of the youth of this and future ages. " In the limitations of an address of this character, it is impossible to do more than allude to the great work of the States of the n6 Mckinley's masterpieces. Union, in their independent relations, in be- half of education. It has surpassed even the high standard of the nation. Two items may be given in illustration : The total expendi- tures of the country in support of the common schools in 1870 were $63,300,000; in 1880, $78,100,000; and in 1890, $140,370,000, an average increase of nearly $4,000,000 per annum. The value of school property has also greatly increased. In 1870 it was $130,380,000; in 1880, $209,571,000; and in 1890, $342,876,000, an average increase per year of $10,000,000 for the whole period. " In addition to this great outlay by the nation and the States, America has just rea- son to be proud of the private benefactions which her philanthropic citizens are constantly making to her colleges and universities. In the founding of public libraries and in aid of the higher schools from 187 1 to 1891 the amount of these gifts exceeded $80,000,000, or more than $4,000,000 a year. I have been pleased to observe that this great University has not been neglected in this regard. The wise beneficence of the late Hon. Henry F. Page, of Circleville, the widow of the late Hon. Henry C. Noble, and, more recently, of the Hon. Emerson McMillin, of Columbus, are examples worthy of emulation by those who have been favored by fortune. Surely accu- EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. I I J mulated wealth can find no object so deserv- ing and so far-reaching in its benefits. " But what has been the result of this un- paralleled expenditure and munificence ? We behold, first, the most satisfactory progress in the public schools, whose enrolment has now reached 13,203,877 pupils, or twenty-three per cent, of our entire population, a greater per- centage than that of any other nation in the world. The people were never more willing to pour out their treasure for the support of these schools. The annual expenditure in the United States compared with other countries shows how near they are to the hearts* of the people. The expenditure in Italy is $7,000, 000, or twenty-five cents per capita ; in Austria, $12,000,000, or thirty cents per capita; in Germany, $26,000,000, or fifty cents per capita ; in France, $31,000,000, or eighty cents per capita; in Great Britain, $48,000,000, or $1.30 per capita; in the United States, in 1892, $156,000,000, or $2.40 per capita. Our cen- sus returns of 1890 show that eighty-seven per cent, of our total population over ten years of age can read and write. ' In the history of the human race,' says Mulhall, the English statistician, ' no nation ever before possessed 41,000,000 instructed citizens.' " But, Mr. President, we must not forget that the whole aim and object of education u8 mckinley's masterpieces. is to elevate the standard of citizenship. The uplifting of our schools will undoubtedly re- sult in a higher and better tone in business and professional life. Old methods and standards may be good, but they must ad- vance with the new problems and needs of the age. The collegiate methods of the Eighteenth Century will not suffice for the Twentieth, any more than the packhorse could meet the demands of the great freight traffic of to-day. This age demands an edu- cation which, while not depreciating in any degree the inestimable advantages of high intellectual culture, shall best fit the man and woman for his or her calling, whatever it may be. In this the moral element must not be omitted. Character - - Christian char- acter — is the foundation upon which we must build if our institutions are to endure. Our obligations for the splendid advantages we enjoy should not rest upon us too lightly. We owe to our country much. We must give in return for these matchless educational opportunities the best results in our lives. We must make our citizenship worthy the great Republic, intelligent, patriotic, and self- sacrificing, or our institutions will fail of their high purpose, and our civilization will inevi- tably decline. Our hope is in the public schools and in the university. Let us fer- EDUCATIONAL TOPICS. 119 vently pray that they may always be gener- ously supported, and that those who go out from these halls will be themselves the best witnesses of their force and virtue in popular government." — Cohunbus, Ohio, June 12, /&I< >NAL ADDRESSES. 207 is large enough. The outgo is not serious if the income exceeds it. False theories should not be permitted to stand in the way of cold facts. The resources which have been de- veloped and the wealth which has been accu- mulated, in the last third of a century in the United States, must not be impaired or diminished or wasted by the application of theories of the dreamer or doctrinaire. Busi- ness experience is the best lamp to guide us in the pathway of progress and prosperity." — ■ Chamber of Commerce, Rochester^ X. )., Feb. JHI ! LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 012 608 081 5