IiuNois ^ SENATfiy Aébem. Lesis. ) ¿2cl Session. DECEMBER 21, 1840. Read, laid on the table, and ordered to ba printed. A LETTER FROM THE GOVERNOK, TRANSMITTING THE CORRESPONDENCE AND ACCOMPANYING PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF CANAL COMMISSIONERS, on the subject of the SALE OF BONDS FOR CANAL PURPOSES, AGREEABLY TO A RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE. SPRINGFÎKLD: WH. WALTERS, PUBLIC PRINTER. HE V-9 » ^ Executive Department, Springfield, Dec. 19, 1840, To the Hon. the Speaker of the Senate. Sir; Pursuant to various resolutions of your honorable body, request¬ ing information relative to a sale of Bonds for Canal purposes, 1 have the honor to communicate the accompanying Papers, which contain the de¬ sired information. I have the honor to be. Your obedient servant. THO. CARLIN. COMMUNICATION CONCERNING THE SALE OF BONDS FOR CANAL PURPOSES. Springfield, Dec. 15, 1840. To his Excellency, Thomas Carlin, Governor of Illinois. Sir: 1 have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 7th instant, together with a resolution of the Senate, requesting from your Excellency, information relative to my agency in the sale of State Bonds, on account of the contractors on the Illinois and Michigan Canal; and I have subsequently received, directly from the Secretary of that body, the following resolution, having the same object, but making ad¬ ditional inquiries: > - '^Resolved, That General Thornton, one of the Canal Commissioners, be requested to inform the Senate whether or not, in the late sale of bonds to him, as agent of the Canal contractors by the Governor, provi¬ sion was made to pay the State the difference of exchange between the United States and the place said bonds are payable; and also, whether any bonds have been hypothecated by him for the purpose of raising money to pay the interest on bonds; and also, whether or not the instal¬ ment by Messrs. Wright & Co. under the contract made by them with the Hon. R. M.. Young, for the Illinois and Michigan Canal Fund, has been paid to the said Young; and if so, at what time and by whom; and where said money has been deposited; if said money has been paid over to the Canal commissioners, and if not, the reasons why said payment has not been made; and if the agents of the State have ever refused to pay the same to the Canal commissioners, the reason assigned for such refusal, and all information in his possession relative thereto." In order to give a clear and connected view of the subject, I beg leave to submit a detailed history of the whole transaction, embracing the ap¬ plication of the contractors for the purchase of bonds—the appointment [22] 6 of an agent for the sale of them—the necessary payment of interest in New York and in London, preparatory to attempting sales—the negotia¬ tion in London of a thousand bonds of £225 sterling each—the disposi¬ tion of the exchange between l.ondon and the United States—and the final disbursements in part, and condition of the remainder of the funds. Soon after the adjournment of the last session of the Legislature, a general meeting of the contractors was held in Lockport, to take into consideration the critical condition in which the laws just enacted had left them; and to devise some plan, if practicable, of averting the ruin¬ ous consequences that must result from a stoppage of the work. The on¬ ly provision made ,bj the Legislature, other than to leave, undisturbed, the previously existing authority to sell State bonds at par, was to pay the contractors whatever might be due them on the first day of March, and not thereafter, in checks on the State Bank of Illinois, bearing an interest of six per centum per annum, and payable whenever funds could be derived from the legal sales of bonds. Checks or scrip, of the charac¬ ter just described, amounting to about four hundred thousand dollars, were accordingly issued for work and other liabilities which had accrued during the winter. But the great scarcity of money at the time, and the uncertainty of the early redemption of the scrip, produced serious losses to contractors, and all parts of the community necessarily connected with them in business. Entertaining no reasonable hope of relief through any regular channel, the convention of contractors, already mentioned, appointed a committee to wait on your Excellency, with a proposition for the purchase of a sufficient number of bonds to sustain the work un¬ til the meeting of the General Assembly; and the President of the Canal Board was urged to accompany the committee, in order that no delay might ensue from the want of such information as your Excellency might require from the commissioners. The result of the negotiation has been communicated to the Legislature in your late message. On the return of the committee to Lockport, the contractors were again convened, and the following resolutions, among others, were unani¬ mously adopted, to wit: "Eeso/ced, That confidently relying on the ability of the Board of Canal commissioners, and their friendly aid in our behalf, this meeting accept, and will carry into effect, the proposition made by his Excellency, Governor Carlin, to the committee appointed by a meeting held by the contractors on the 24th day of February last, for the purposé of waiting on him in their behalf, as follows: 'Governor Carlin proposes to place in the hands of the Canal commissioners an amount of State bonds, equal to the amount of work that will be done on the Illinpis and Michigan Canal, between this time and the meeting of the next Legislature, in¬ cluding the amount of work now done, the estimates of which aré unpaid, supposed to amount altogether to about twelve hundred tb.ousand dollars; and the Governor instructs said commissioners to sell the same, in their discretion, on such terms only as shall secure the legal par value of the same to the State, and the proceeds of such sale or sales to apply in pay¬ ment of the current expenses of the Canal.' "Resolved, That the commissioners are hereby instructed to dispose of bonds furnished in accordance with the foregoing resolution, to the best 7 [23] possible advantage, at any price they may think proper, not less than seventy-five cents on the dollar in par funds in New York; and when requested by any party interested, to hold his bonds, or any part thereof, at a higher rate than seventy-five cents, then they will observe such requests, and carry them into eifect for the benefit of the contractor so directing. '^Resolved, That in case the commissioners shall be unable to sell bonds within the rates limited by the foregoing resolution, or may deem it more to the interest of contractors to hypothecate, they are hereby re¬ quested to hypothecate a sum not exceeding half the bonds, as in their discretion they maj? deem advisable. ^'■Resolved, That in selecting an agent to negotiate the bonds on the part of the contractors, it becomes necessary to combine financial talent, firmness, and integrity, in one who knows our wants, and at the same time knows the deep distress that would be the consequence of a failure to progress with our work; and from the ability and well known qualifica¬ tions of W. F. Thornton, Esq. President of the Board of Canal Commis¬ sioners, we most confidently place our bonds at his disposal, feeling well assured of his success. , * , Resolved, That General Thornton's expenses in negotiating bonds, in¬ cluding any commissions that he may think proper to pay to a banking house, or other assistance, be charged to contractors purchasing bonds of the State, in proportion to the amount of their several subscriptions; and the Secretary of the Board, Joel Manning, Esq. is hereby authorised to retain such sum from the estimates of contractors in proportion to their respective amounts." Previous to either of their meetings, the principal part of the contrac¬ tors had solicited me, in the event oftheir obtaining bonds, to act as their negotiator, which from many considerations, involving my own comfort and safety, I repeatedly declined ; but when my services were unanimous¬ ly required, with a very general assurance, that if I continued to refuse, I might be the cause of defeating their last prospect; and especially since your Excellency had expressed a wish that 1 should undertake the nego¬ tiation, I could no longer hesitate, and in co-'operation with the Board of Commissioners, proceeded to make the proper preparations for the secu¬ rity of the State, and the introduction of the bonds legally into market. Paper No. 1, is the power of Attorney of your Excellency, authorising the Board of Commissioners to sell bonds to the contractors. Paper No. 2, is the form of an obligation taken from each contractor, to make good to the State the difference between the par value of the bonds and the price at which his agent was limited to sell them. Paper No. 3, is the form of a power of attorney, duly executed by each contractor to the agent. Paper No. 4, is a letter of attorney from the Board of Commissioners of the Illinois and Michigan Canal to the agent of the contractors, empow¬ ering said agent to sell bonds on account of said contractors, in confor¬ mity with the Governor's authority as exhibited in Paper No. 1. Paper No. 5, is your Excellency's power of attorney to sell bonds cn account of the Canal Fund; and Papers No. 6 and 7, are your letters of instruction relative to the sale of these bonds, as Well as tho.«e of the con¬ tractors. [24] 8 This series of papers, supported bj sufficient evidences of the progress^ condition, and national importance of the Canal, and the value of its re¬ sources, independent of the credit of the State, completed the prepara¬ tions deemed necessary for offering the bonds in market. It remained, however, to make timely provision for the payment of the interest falling due on the first Monday of July following, which, in this country, amount¬ ed to about ^45,000, and in Europe, including a payment previously made by the Bank of the United States, and still due her, to about $90,000. Unless the interest could be punctually paid, it was manifest to every one, that any further attempt at negotiations would be in vain; hence my first efforts were directed to that object. There was no money in the Treasury as had been shown in the last Annual Report of the Board of Commissioners; and the oppressed state of the country rendered it entirely certain that neither sales of lands, nor collections on account of those already sold, could be relied on as early as July. But up to May, it had been confidently believed that ample resources would be derived from Messrs. John Wright & Co. of London, who had contracted with Judge Young and Gov. Reynolds to advance £10,000 in January last, and £20,000 six months thereafter, both of wh ich sums had been relied upon for the payment of the July in¬ terest—the one in this country, and the other in Europe. And here it may be proper to revert to the Senate resolution, quoted in the com¬ mencement of this communication. . Enqiury is made whether the £10,000 due from Messrs. Wright &Co. has been paid, and if paid, where deposited, &c. I can only say, that I learned from your Excellency, during last winter, and while the Legisla¬ ture was in session, that Judge Young had sold a draft on Messrs.Wright & Co. for the amount in question, to the Bank of the United States, and had deposited the proceeds, amounting to about $56,000, to his own cre¬ dit, in that institution; and I soon afterwards learned, but from what source I do not now recollect, that Judge Young had withdrawn the de¬ posite from the Bank, and was converting it into western funds, to remit for the use of the Canal. I think it was about the close of the session that I informed your Ex¬ cellency of what I had heard, and took the liberty to recommend that the money remain in eastern funds, for the payment of the July in¬ terest, being the only sure dependence for that purpose. While in Quincy, in company with the committee of contractors, your Excellency informed us of your determination to annul Messrs. Wright & Co.'s contract, and of your having instructed Messrs. Young and Rey¬ nolds to that effect; but at the earnest request of ¿he committee, in which I joined, you consented to countermand, the instructions, and allow the contract to be turned over to the contractors pn the Canal,who were willing to make it a par negotiation to the State, if funds could be real¬ ized from it in time to meet their engagements. In the course of a few weeks, however, Judge Young expressed his opinion in a letter to the contractors, that the proposed change could not be effected. But in the latter part of April, your Excellency, urged by the contractors and my¬ self, sanctioned the contract of Wright & Co. on condition, that it could be made available for the existing year's operations upon the Canal, 9 [25] which being doubtful, left it also in doubt whether the £20,000 would be paid at maturity, and whether, unless the conditions were removed. Judge Young would not be required by Wright & Co. to refund the £10,000, and cancel the contract: In such an event, I was authorized by your Excellency to borrow money for the payment of interest, and to hypothecate bonds as security, until some other arrangement could be made. • On j^my arrival in New York, about the middle of May, I found the stock market so much depressed, as to leave no hope of negotiation on reasonable terms, especially as the payment of the July instalment of interest on any portion of our bonds was not yet certain. Our Fund Commissioner was there, and had fair prospects of meeting his share of the payments, if that of the Canal could be promptly arranged; and without it there would be very little use in his making an effort, since it was generally acknowledged, that a failure in either case would be deem¬ ed a failure intoto. Thus critically circumstanced, I proceeded immedi¬ ately to Washington city, and made an application to Judge Young and Gov. Reynolds, for the £10,000 in their hands, and also for bills on Mes¬ sieurs Wright & Co. for the £20,000 due in July. No definite answer was given as to the £10,000, but Judge Young, after a consultation with , Gov. Reynolds, accompanied me to Philadelphia, for the purpose of en¬ deavoring to induce the United States Bank, to forward, to their agent in London, a conditional bill for £20,000 on Messrs. Wright & Co. and guaranty, on the collateral security of State bonds, the payment of the European interest in the event of the bill not being duly honored. On my way to Washington I met In Philadelphia, with Col. Mather, Presi¬ dent of our State Bank, then on his return from New York to Illinois, and prevailed on him to remain with and aid me until something decisive could be done. He united with me in urging Judge Young to appro¬ priate the £10,000 in hand to the payment of the New York interest, expressing his opinion, that means having been provided for the Ameri¬ can interest, the United States Bank, as holders of the London bonds, would readily consent to protect them. But the approval of the contract with Wright & Go. had been made conditional by your Excellency. It was therefore contended by Judge Young, that he was bound to hold the £10,000, subject to the order of Messrs. Wright «& Co. should they reject the condition, and prefer, as they had a right to do, an abrogation of the contract. To obviate this objection, I proposed to Col. Mather to secure the State Bank of Illinois, and let her become responsible to Judge Young for the payment of the £10,000, if Wright &; Co. should demand it to be refunded, which being acceded to. Judge Young promised to return immediately to Washington, to confer with Gov. Reynolds, and forward the result of their conference as early as practicable to New York, where Col. Mather consented to await their answer. The propo¬ sition in relation to the conditional bill was then made to the Bank of the United States, and rejected; but it was agreed by the President, that he would transmit the bill for collection, and furnish me with a letter to Mr. Jaudon, the agent of the Bank in London, which would, in all pro¬ bability, insure the payment of the interest, even should the bill be dis¬ honored. Paper No. 8, is a copy of the Bill on Messrs. Wright & Co., for £26] 10 ) £20,000, with the letter of advice, and the agreement of Mr. Dunlap, ■ that no damages should result from non-payment. On the 23d of May, Judge Yonnglreturned to Washington, to obtain the signature of Governor Reynolds to the bills, and to consult him in re¬ lation to the payment of the £10,000; and on the same day, Col. Mather and myself left Philadelphia for New-York. ' Believing that no further difficulty could arise, I detérmined tb embark for London, on the first of June; but on the 27th of May, I received letters from Judge Young and Governor Reynolds, positively declining either to part with the money in their possession, or to draw on Messrs. Wright & Co., in favor of Mr. Jaudon. Papers No. 9 and 10, being copies of the letters referred to, will furnish the reasons of those gentlemen for declining any participation in the payment of interest. This late and unexpected determination, rendered it highly important to the character of the State, and to the contractors on the Canal, who had appointed me their Agent, that some new negotiation should be at¬ tempted, without loss of time. The interest, payable in London, would be due on the first of July, and ought to be in place, and announced se¬ veral days in anticipation. The steamer, British Queen, was to sail from New York on the first day of June, and no other steam ship until the first of the following month. It was evident, therefore, that remittances must go out in the Queen, or the interest be unpaid; and it was equally plain that a certainty of being dishonored in Europe, would at once so severely affect our credit at home, as to render any further effort unavail- ' able. It was conceded, too, that unless the Canal interest could be paid in proper time, our Fund Commissioner would be unable to meet his en¬ gagements on the remainder of the State debt, which, otherwise, he would find no difficulty in doing. Impressed with a conviction of the disastrous consequences that must flow from a failure to maintain the integrity of the State, one of whiçh must be the prostration, for years to come, of the noblest enterprise in the Union; and believing it to be my imperious duty to avert so great a calamity, if in my power to do it, I unhesitatingly concluded to borrow money, at any reasonable rate of interest, until the Legislature could have an opportunity of determining on the proper course to be pursued. I still believed, that by going immediately to Washington, and placing the subject in its true light before Messrs. Y'^oung and Reynolds, I might succeed in prevailing on them, if not to part with the money in hand, at least to draw, conditionally, on Messrs. Wright & Co., for the £20,000, which I was confident could be made available in London. I proposed this course to Messrs. Nevins, Townsend & Co., who were deeply inter¬ ested in our welfare, and, with the assistance of Col. Mather, obtained a promise from them to advance me ^45,000, at six per centum per annum, for the payment of the interest coming due in New York,ii I could succeed in obtaining the draft on Messrs. Wright & Co., and would proceed in the 'first ship for London, so as to secure the payment of the interest in that city. I accordingly left New York in the evening train of cars, and arrived in Washington the next morning, at eleven o'clock. Judge Young and Governor Reynolds still persisted in withholding the Bill on Messrs. Wright & Co., urging the absence of instructions from your Excellency, 11 - .[27] but when I assured them that their continued refusal must certainly hring discredit upon the State, and that with the aid of their conditional draft on Messrs. Wright & Co., 1 could do without the £ 10,000, by borrow¬ ing money in New York, they concluded to draw, provided I would de¬ posite in their hands two hundred thousand dollars, in State bonds, which I thought it best to acquiesce in, and on my way back, 1 left the Bill and letter of advice with the President of the United States Bank, who trans¬ mitted it to Mr. Jaudon, without delay. ■ ' ' Paper No. II, is a copy of my letter to Meesrs. NeVins, Townsend & Co., pledging a hundred State Bonds, as security for the payment of the New York interest; and Paper No. 12, is a^copy of a letter I had the honor to address to your Excellency, on the first of June, in explanation of the transactions just described. On the same day, I took passage in the steam ship, British Queen, and arrived in London on the 16th of the same month. My first attention thertí,as in New York, was directed to the payment of the interest, which would fall due in fifteen days. Ten of the filteen were spent m repeated interviews with Messrs. Wright & Co., in which 1 ap¬ prised them of your Excellency's conditional approval of their contract with Messrs. Young and Reynolds, and my letter from New York, recom¬ mending a withdrawál of the objectionable conditions. Having received no assurance from them that could be calculated on with certainty, Mr, Jaudon addressed them a note on the 2jth of June, requesting a positive decision, in relation to the draft for £20,000; and On the following morn¬ ing received an answer, which was communicated to me on the same day, and replied to on the next. Paper No. 13, is thé letter to Mr. Jaudon, and Paper No. 14, is my answer. They resulted in the acceptance of the draft, which was paid at maturity, ard the interest, amounting to £13,500, was of course promptly met. The remaining £6,500, with the exchange between London and Philadelphia, was passed to the credit of the Canal Fund, in the Bank of the United States, which institution was in advance to the Canal about $ 25,000, on account of interest. Messrs. Wright & Co., having paid the £20,000, and decided to ad¬ here to their contract, I wrote to Judge Young on the 30th of June, ac¬ quainting him of the fact, and requesting him to apply the £ 10,000, now unquestionably set at liberty, to the payment of Messrs.Nevins,Townsend & Co., as I was anxious to redeem the hypothecated bonds; and I also wrote to Messrs. Nevins, Townsend & Co., by the same ship, that the money borrowed of them would at once be paid by Judge Young. Why it was not then, nor since, paid, 1 have no knowledge. ' The bonds are still in pledge, and the debt has been renewed from October to the first of January, as per agreement with the lenders. The punctual payment of the interest, both in New York and London, enabled me to go into market with the contractors' bonds. Messrs. Wright & Co. would neither buy nor make further advances, yet th^y rendered mè every assistance in their power, particularly by inspiring the confidence of investors. After a careful examination of the value of pub¬ lic stocks in London, and having, through the friendly services of Mr. Jaudon and others, convinced myself that nothing would be gained by going to France or Holland, 1 entered into contract, on the 20th of July, with the distinguished house of Messrs. Magniac, Smiths & Co,, of Lom- [28] 12 ' bard street, for the sale of one thousand bonds of two hundred and twenty five pounds Sterling, each, at the rate of eighty-three pounds perhundred, payable, principal and interest, at the banking house of Messrs. John Wright & Co.^ in consideration of which, and having become interested in our welfare, Messrs. Wright & Co. agreed to pay the January inter¬ est, or dividends, on all Sterling Canal bonds, without regard to further sales under their contract with Messrs. Young and Reynolds. Paper No. 15, is a copy of a letter from Messrs. Wright & Co., and Paper No. 16, is a copy of one from Mr. Samuel Ailinson, an American broker, of high standing in London, who had aided Judge Young,and whose services were very useful to me. These letters will show the state of the market, and the elevated character of the house,to whomi sold. Paper No. 17, is a copy of, the contract with Messrs. Magniac, Smiths & Co.; and Paper No. 18, is the copy of an agreement between the same parties, rendered necessary, in the opinion of purchasers, by the proceedings of our Legislature, at its last session. Qy reference to the contract, it will be observed that the purchase mo¬ ney was to be paid in three instalments, to wit: £86,750, on the 15th day of November, £50,000 on the 15th day of January, and £50,000 on the 15th day of March; but as bills on London are almost uniformly drawn in this country at sixty days sight, the payments were so regulated that the first would be cash, on my arrival in New York; the second on the 15th day of November, and the last on the 15th day of January. Of the first payment, I received £ 1,000 in money, and ^ letter of credit to Messrs. Rowland & Aspenwall, of New York, for £ 3,000, leaving a ba¬ lance of £82,750, for which 1 took the obligation of Messrs. Magniac, Smiths & Co., payable, on the 15th of November, to Mr. Jaudon, agent of the Ban'l? of the United States, who purchased it of me at the rate of four dollars and eighty-four cents per pound Sterling, and gave me a cer¬ tificate of deposite for $400,510, payable to my order, in the city of New York. Bills were then, and after my return, plentiful in all the Ameri¬ can cities, at six and a half per cent, premium, in specie funds, while the sale to the Bank of the United States will nett a fraction under nine, be¬ sides saving one per cent, commission, making, altogether, a saving to the State of about $ 14,000. Paper No. 19, is a copy of my letter to Mr. Jaudon, which will more fully explain the terms of the sale. The certifi¬ cate of deposite was paid on presentation, but left in the same Bank, in New York, till drawn for, in the course of disbursements. For the other two payments of £50,000 each, I received a letter of credit, addressed to the Bank of the United States, and to Messrs. Nevins, Townsend & Co., authorizing either of them, or myself, to draw for those sums; and on my arrival in New York, I entered into an agreement with Messrs. Nev¬ ins, 'fownsend & Co., to transact the business. Paper No. 20, is a copy of the letter of credit, and also of the agreement. (See, also, Paper No. 21.) Of the proceeds of the thousand bonds sold to Messrs. Magniac, Smiths & Co., the whole of the first and second instalments, and a part of the last, have been paid to the contractors. The remainder will be disbursed on the first of February next, when the transaction will be finally clo¬ sed. In answer to the inquiry from the Senate, " Whether, in the sale of bonds to the agent of the contractors, by the Governor, provision was 13 [29j made to pay the State the difference of exchange bet?reen the United States and the plaee where said bonds are payable," I have the honor to state, that the whole of the exchange, already and yet to he realised, has been secured to the Canal Fund^ I was not at liberty to do otherwise, unless in violation of a conviction that the true par value of a State bond is the precise amount that the State must pay to redeem it; and that the rate of interest on the money received must be no greater than that pro¬ mised in the bond. As the agent of the contractors, I was authorised to' ■ sell bonds of a thousand dollars each, payable in New York; or of, two hundred and twenty-five pounds Sterling each, payable in London, as, in my opinion, might best subserve their interests ; and, with that view, I decided, after I arrived in London, on selling Sterling bonds, payable there, which brought eighty-three per centum; while dollar bonds, payable in the United States, would not have commanded more than seventy-three, if, indeed, they could have been sold at alL The British coins, called Sovereigns, are real Pounds Sterling, and were formerly worth, in this country, by comparison with our coins, four dollars forty four cents and four mills, rating the dollar at four and six¬ pence Sterling; hence a thousand dollars would then have been exactly equivalent to two hundred and twenty-five pounds Sterling. But by an act of Congress, passed during the first Presidency of General Jackson, the standard of our coinage was so changed that a Sovereign, compared with our Eagles and Half Eagles, became intrinsically and legally worth about an average of four dollars and eighty-four cents, or nine per cent, more than before the change, and must continue to be so, as long as our present standard is adhered to. Bills on England, therefore, at the nomi¬ nal rate of nine per cent, premium, is, in truth, at par; and, consequent¬ ly, when over or under nine per cent, are above or below true par. It ■ will be seen, from this fact, that a bond for £225, Sterling, payable in England, is a bond for the same number of Sovereigns, which evidently exceed a thousand dollars of our money, in the same proportion that four dollars and eighty-four cents, the present legal worth of a Sovereign, exceed four dollars and forty-four cents, the former worth; or; as a thou¬ sand and ninety dollars exceed a thousand. If, therefore^ I had sold for the contractors, a thousand bonds of a thousand dollars each, payable in New York, with interest at the rate of six per centum per annum, a million of dollars in work on the Canal would have been par to the State; because a million of dollars would retire the bonds at maturity, and sixty thousand dollars pay the annual interest of six per cent. But I sold a thousand bonds of two hundred and twenty-five pounds Sterling each, payable in London, amounting to two hundred and twenty-five thousand Sovereigns, to repay which will require, not only a million of dollars, law¬ ful money of the, United States, but somewhere about ninety thousand dollars, in addition, by way of exchange, and the same rate of increase will attend every annual or semi-annual dividend of interest. Admitting the position to be true, as previously assumed, that the par value of a bond is what it will take to redeem it, dollar for dollar and pound for pound, the contractors must pay the State £225,000, in London, for the thou¬ sand bonds sold on their account, or a million of dollars, lawful money of the United States, with the actual exchange between London and New York; and : this they have been required to do, as the annual report of m . the Board of Canal Commissioners, about to be made, will show. The' amount of exchange accruing to the State cannot be accurately ascer¬ tained until the sales of the bills be closed, and Messrs. Nevins, Towns- end & Co. render their account; but it will not vary far from an average of seven and a half per cent, nett, or seventy-five thousand dollars on the thousand bonds sold, being one and a half per cent, less than regular par, which, as before stated, is nine per cent, nominal premium. In the spring, bills were worth ten and a half per cent., but becoming more and ' more plentiful, as our new crops of cotton and tobacco arrived in mark-' et, they of course fell. Had the spring price been maintained, the State, and not the contractors, would have gained the excess; as it is, she must bear the depreciation. All that can be done by a negotiator is to re¬ ceive par at the point of negotiation, for bills may be heavily above the regular or true par, when he leaves New York, and as much below when he returns and has a right to draw ; or, the case may be reversed. ' The advantage gained for the contractors by selling Sterling instead of dollar bonds may be clearly seen, by the following comparative calcula¬ tion: . A thousand bonds of two hundred and twenty-five pounds Sterling each, estimating the exchange at seven and a half per cent., cost the contractors a million and seventy-five thousand dollars; and they receive for them £ 186,750 Sterling, in London, which, with seven and a half per cent, exchange, yeilcied them in New York f892,250, or eighty-three dollars, in specie funds, for every hundred dollars paid to the State. " On the other hand, a thousand bonds ofa thousand dollars each, paya¬ ble in New York, would have cost them a million of dollars, and brought in London, seventy-three per cent., or, |^730,000, which, with seven and a' half exchange, would have been ^ 784,750, or, ^ 78 47i, for every hun¬ dred paid; making a gain of $ 32,500, by purchasing, of the State, Ster¬ ling bonds of twq hundred and twenty-five pounds each, in preference to thousand dollar bonds, payable in the United States. I have been thus particular in defining the character of the two classes of our bonds, knowing that many of the contractors honestly believe that they should not have been charged more than a thousand dollars; each, for two hundred, and twenty-five pound Sterling bonds; alleging, as a reason, the known fact, that the thousand bonds sold by General Raw-'' lings and Governor Reynolds, to the Bank of the United States, in April, 1839, were precisely similar, in ¡amount and quality, to those sold by me. Their sale produced to the State, exclusive of expenses, about ' $ 988,000; that to the contractors, $ 1,075,000, a difference of $89,000. The contracts made by other agents of the State, with Messrs. Wright & Co., were also for Sterling bonds, payable in London, and will nett no more to the hundred than the sale to the Bank of the United States. ' ; Taking into consideration the great sacrifices made by contractors, both ' in scrip and in bonds, without which the Canal must have been Suspend- ' ed, with enormous loss to the State, the Legislature may possibly abate the amount of exchange between Great Britain and the United States,, and place them on a footing with all other purchasers of Sterling bonds. But however equitable such a relief might be (and I confess that I think it would be just,) I. am well satisfied that I have properly construed the power of attorney and letter of instructions from your ExceBeney. ^ 15 [31] The cost of the negotiation, made for the contractors, is another inqui¬ ry by the Senate. The expenses chargeable to the State, will be less than two hundred dollars, for transportation, numbering and filling of bonds and coupons, and the attestation of the requisite books and papers. The entire cost to contractors is one and three-quarters per cent, on the amount of bond& sold for them—half per cent, of which was paid for brokerage, and one and a quarter for my commission and expenses. The two per cent, com¬ mission, named in the contract, as an allowance to Messrs. Magniac,. Smiths & Co., is merely nominal; the sale being an actual one,, at th& rate of eighty-three pounds per hundred, and one which has not been« ^ equalled since. Nor could it have been effected then, but for the satis¬ factory proofs which were exhibited, that the real estate, irrevocably pledged for debt and interest, was amply sufficient to prevent the Canal from ever becoming a burden to the State. The contract has received the formal approbation of your Excellency, of the Board of Commis¬ sioners, and of the contractors unanimously. 1 have stated, in another part of this communication, that the money borrowed from Messrs. Nevins, Townsend & Co., on the first of June, for the payment of the July interest, in New York, will be due on the first of January. There will likewise be due, on the same day, 39,000, for the payment of the'semi-annual interest on Canal bonds, payable in this coun¬ try. The last named sum will be paid by Judge Young, out of the funds- in his hands, agreeably to your Excellency's directions; but no other pro- vision having been made for discharging the debt to Messrs. Nevins, Townsend & Co., I wrote to them, by Doctor Barrett, to retain the amount out of the last payment due from Messrs. Magniac, Smith & Co. By this means the Legislature will have full time to deliberate on the sub¬ ject, and may either authorise the borrowing of money upon a new hypo¬ thecation of bonds, or take a sufficient portion of the contractors' loan on the same terms that they do. I venture to suggest this alternative, under á knowledge of the condi¬ tion of the " Canal Fund," which, with the exception of bills receivable and money held in trust for the contractors, consists of scrip issued by the Board on the first of March, and received by the Treasurer during the year, in payment of lands and interest. The amount required to pay Messrs. Nevins, Townsend «fe Co. will be about $47,000, of which there is about $7,000 in the United States Bank, and about $ 17,000, in the hands of Judge Young, after paying the $39,000, due for interest on the first of the next month. If these sums be at once applied (and I see no reason why they may not.) the deficien¬ cy will be about $ 23,000. Trusting that this report may afford all the information sought by the Senate, and prove satisfactory to your Excellency. I remain, sir, • Very respectfully. Your obedient servant, ■ I ' W. F. THORNTON. DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING THE FOREGOING REPORT. Paper No. 1. COMMISSION. Execütive Department, March 9, 1840. To all to whom these Presents shall come, greeting:—Know ye, that I, Thomas Carlin, Governor of the State of Illinois, reposing special trust and confidence iu the capacity and integrity of William F. Thornton, Jacob Fry, and David Prickett, commissioners of the Illinois and Mi¬ chigan Canal, have appointed, and by these presents do, by virtue of the power and authority vested in me as chief magistrate of said State, by an act of the General Assembly thereof, entitled "An Act to provide for a loan for Canal purposes," approved February 23d, 1839, appoint said William F. Thornton, Jacob Fry, and David Prickett, or any two of thern, special agents in behalf of the said State of Illinois, to negotiate a loan of one million of dollars, being a part of the loan of four millions of dollars, authorised by the provisions of the said act, for the construction of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, provided the same can be effected at par, agreeably to the limitations and restrictions of the above recited act, and such other acts as may have been enacted on that subject. And the said commissioners of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, or any two of them, are hereby fully authorized to sell at par value to anj con¬ tractor on the said Canal, such portion of the aforesaid loan of a million of dollars in bonds of one thousand dollars, or two hundred and twenty- five pounds sterling each, as said contractors may require for the prose¬ cution of his contract during the present year: Provided, that in all cases of sales to contractors, they shall, jointly or severally, appoint an agent or attorney, to be approved of by the Canal commissioners, or any two of them, to re-sell said bonds, either in the U. States, or in Europe, at par, above par, or below par, at the pleasure of each contractor. But in all cases where a contractor shall authorize his agent or attorney to sell said bonds for less than par value, said contractor shall be required by said Canal commissioners, to give ample security to the State for the difife- c [34] rence betïveen the par value of said bonds and the price at which sai-i contractor shall authorize them to he sold by his agent or attorney. And said agent or attorney shall pay over the proceeds of all sales on ac-^ count of contractors, to the Board of Commissioners of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, to be paid by them to each contractor, respectively, in proportion to the progress of his work. Given under my hand, this ninth day of March, Anno Domini, one thousand eight hundred and forty. (Signed) THOMAS CARLIN, Governor of Illinois, Paper No. 2. Form of a Bond taken from Contractors to secure the State against toss on State Bonds. Whereas the Governor of the State of Illinois has placed in the hands of the Board of Commissioners of the lllinpis and Michigan Canal, a large amount of Bonds of the State of Illinois, issued for and in aid of the con¬ struction of the said Canal, authorized so to be issued by the provisions of'^An act to provide for a loan for Canal purposes," approved February 23, 1839, to be disposed of by said commissioners, at not less than par value to the State; , And whereas the undersigned contractor on the said Canal desires to obtain funds to carry on his work on said Canal, and has with that view this day agreed, and hereby doth agree with said Board of Commission¬ ers of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, for the purchase of fifty of said State Bonds, each being for the sum of one thousand dollars, or two hun¬ dred and twenty-five pounds sterling money, at the election of William F. Thornton, at par, and has this day given to the said William F. Thorn¬ ton, Esq. President of said Board, a full power of attorney to dispose of, sell, or hypothecate said bonds, at par, or above or below par, in his dis¬ cretion, for the benefit and on account of the undersigned; And whereas the existing laws of the State of Illinois do not authorize or permit a sale of said bonds on account of the State, at a less rate than at par value, which the undersigned supposes to be a higher rato than can now be obtained for them, the undersigned, therefore, hereby agree to pay, account for, or allow to the Board of Canal commissioners, the difference between the par value of said bonds, and the price at which said Thornton, as attorney aforesaid, may sell, hypothecate, or otherwise dispose of thé same, or any part thereof. Now for the purpose of securing to the State of Illinois any différence between the par value and the price at which said Thornton may sell, dispose of, or hypothecate said bonds, the undersigned agrees and autho¬ rises said Board of Commissioners of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, to retain in their hands, and to deduct from the account of the undersigned, 80 much of the back money or per-centage of the undersigned, as may be now due, or so much of any other moneys or indebtedness due, or that shall hereafter become due the undersigned from the Board of Canal Commissioners as shall be sufficient to pay the difference between the par 19 [35] value and the amount îbr which said bonds may be sold, disposed of, or hypothecated as aforesaid. And the undersigned further agrees that the said Thornton may pay over to, and the said Board of Commissioners shall receive and retain in their hands, as security for the purchase mo¬ ney of said bonds, the amount received by said Thornton for said bonds, on sale, or hypothecation, or other disprosition of the same, which amount so received shall be paid to the undersigned for work done or to be done on said. Canal, in pursuance of Canal contracts, the Canal Board reserv¬ ing, however, a sufficient amount to make said bonds of par value to the State, and in case of failure on the part of the undersigned to pay the State, or the Board of Commissioners, the par value of said bonds as aforesaid, and in case the securities above pledged to the State should not be found sufficient fully to the payment of such difference between the price obtained for the bonds and their value, the undersigned further agrees, that in case of any suit ot suits being brought by the undersigned against the said Board of Commissioners of the Illinois and Michigan Canal for damages for breach of contract, or for other cause or failure ■on the part of said Board to comply with their contract made with the undersigned, that then and in that case the said Board of Commissioners shall be permitted and allowed in defence as a set-off (to be deducted from such claim for remuneration for any such breach of contract or other action at law or in equity against them) the amount of any such deficit that may yet remain due the State from the undersigned for bonds pur¬ chased at par value in manner aforesaid. In witness whereof the undersigned hereunto sets his hand and seal, this day of . A. D. 1840. > In presence of rized to draw on us as follows, viz: On or after tho tenth daj of Novem¬ ber next, for the proceeds of fifty thousand pounds, and on and after the I5th January next, for the proceeds of the remaining fifty thousand pounds. It is further understood that we have full and entire authority to sell and dispose of said bills at any time We think proper, in conformity with the letter of credit. NEVINS, TOWNSEND & Co. New York, August 14, 1840. London, July 23, 1840. Messrs. Nkvins, Townsend & Co. JVein York; or, The Cashier of the Bank of the United States, Philadelphia. Gentlemen: We hereby authorize General William Fitzhugh Thorn¬ ton, of Illinois, to pass drafts, or to permit you to daaw for his account, upon us, for the respective sums of j05O,OOO, to fall due here on the 15th January, 1841, and of jg50,000, to fall due here on 15th March, 1841, amounting in all to £100,000—say one hundred thousand pounds sterling; to which extent such valuation shall meet due honor. We remain. Gentlemen, Your most obedient servants, (Signed) MAGNIAC, SMITHS & Co. Paper No. 21. Copy of a letter from W. F. Thornton to Messrs. Magniae, Smiths ^ Co. London. New York, August 13,1840. Messrs. Magniac, Smiths & Co. Gentlemen: 1 have just made an arrangement with Messrs. Nevins, Townsend & Co. of this city, by which the authority contained in your letter of the 22d ultimo, directed to them or to the Cashier of the Bank of the United States, at Philadelphia, for me to draw, or to permit either of the parties just named to draw on your house for one hundred thousand pounds sterling, (of which fifty thousand pounds will fall due on the I5tb of January next, and the remaining fifty thousand on the I5th March next,) is now conferred on and rests solely with Messrs. Nevins, Town- send & Co. whose bills you will please honor in conformity with your let¬ ter already recited. Very respectfully, Gentlemen, Your obedient servant, (Signed) W. F. THORNTON.