• '■■ . '• *wfSr% '' fh*Wi BBSs ^ T C/ 2. >■! o 5 c « " I . 4 1 .. ?> .• . ■ < W.J-' i I '■ ;. A J . -. . 1 ., ~ V . • - .i . f ■ '• ■•• • *• I 4 ■ 'r-~. > ' l ' 1 ' /■ -... \ - •- " f- " f- f \ /. ^ « , ■ ■- -• ■.•• r ■ . ■ . As to his Reflexions upon the Intereft which the Papijls had in our Paft troubles; thefearehis words in his Preface to the aforelaid Nar¬ rative. i Who befde thefe were the Firfi Aut hours and Contrivers of the late Unnatu¬ ral War, by their Known Diabolical Art of enfaming Parties, and Pafjions a- gainfi each other? And ( addrefling to the King ) of your Royal Fathers Unfpeakable fufferings, and Barbarous Ufage ? It was that brought him to his End, and flourifh'd swords, and Trumpets over his dead , whom they durjf uot approach when Living. The Putney Projectours ( fays he ) were in mofl, if not all the Councils, that contrived his Ruine. What broke the Ux- bridge Treaty, but the Romilh Intereft, and Policy? Who continued to baffle all defigns of Peace, and Settlement to this Nation, and Profperity to his Majejlies Family, but thole Incendiaries, Milton was a known frequenter of aPopifh Club; who more forward to fet up Cromwell, and to put the Crown of our Kings upon his Head, then Papifts ? And his new fangled Go¬ vernment was contriv dby a Popifh Prieft; and Lambert a Papift, for a- bove thefe Thirty years. I have inferted thefe Paflages as a Curiofity in the Hiftory of thole times; which may perhaps have efcap'd other men as well as my elf. For though I never made any Queftion, but that the Church of England, as it ftands Eftablifhed by Law, in the Purity of Doctrine, and the Ve¬ nerable Sobriety of Uifcipline, was ever an Eye fore to the Church of Rome; yet I wasof Opinion too, that a Licentious Vein of Afmbition and Schifmamong our felves, had carry'd a great ftroke alfo in that Fa¬ tal Revolution. But however, this is a point wherein a man may with¬ out lofs of Honour, or Credit, admit the poffibility of his being in a Miftake. Wherefore we fhall now ( with the Leave ) advance to plain matter of Fact,whereupon we have his Depofition ; the only Cafe wherein a man may, without Vanity pronounce himfelf within a degree of Infallible. WefindePag. 8. that Richard Nicholas BlundellA*^<*zwy day iu the Week his fever, alplaces in the City of London, where he taught the Touth Treafonable, and Malicious, DoClrine, and Perfon of his Sacred Majefly. Alfo ( Pag. 25.) that Richard Afhby had a Conference for thefending of New Meffengers into Scotland, to promote the Commotions there 5 and to inform the People, of the great Tyranny they did ly under, by reafon of their being deny'd the Liberty oft heir Confluence; and that not being to be pro¬ cured but by the ftvord,they muff take that Courfe to pur chafe their Liberty By which means (Jdyd the Fathers thus Affem we fhall weaken both the Presbyterian, aWEpifcopal /adtion. At which Conference, the D E- B PONENt (4) PONE NT was P RES ENT, and heard the Words. And again, Two Meffengers werefentinto .Scotland, Cue by theNmt of Father Moore, and the Other by the Name of Aat b er «5au n der s alias Brow n, with Infractions to carry themfelves like R M 1ST I NISTE RS; and to Preach to the Difaffedfed Scots, the Necefflty of ta¬ king up the Sword for the Defence of Liberty of Confidence. Thefe the PONENTfawDilpatch'd, &c. Take notice, in the Firfplace, that here's a Defigne carry'd cn for the Deft ruff ten of the King, and the Embroyling cf the Government. Se¬ condly, the pretence of the Quarrel is to be matter of liberty and Confer¬ ence. Thirdly,it is to be promoted by Emiffaries, in the and Conventicles of the Non-Conformifis. Fourthly, the means by which the Papiflspropound to compafs their Ends, are by making Interefis withthoSeparatifis, under the Difguife of Minifiers, and Teachers, re- fpedfively of the fever al Parties they have to do witball. And Fifthly, Let me recommend this Particular to your Special Remark, that Dr. Oates, throughout the whole Courfe of his charges no part of the Poptfh Defign upon any Intelligence, or Communication with the Church of England; but makes it only to be a praftice upon the ters from the Englifh Communion, to tranfport them into and Difempers againft both Church and State. , ■ f \ We have here in few words, z S cheme of xbo whole bufinefis ; Here's the Defigne,the Pretext, theInfruments and the Methods'- and upon the whole matter, here is the Church of England acquitted, as to any point of unwarrantable affinity with the Principles or PraO.ifes of the Church of Rome ;however that Tefly frenchman is pleas'd to (peculate in his Fanatical Reve'ryes upon our approaches to That Communion: Wherein it may be a Queftion,whether he is more out in his or in his Morals. We are, in fhort, very much obliped to the Dodtor, for clearing our Church to all Gainfayers/rom thofe oblcquies which by both the Extremes are indifferently caft upon us. It mull not be any longer a fuppofition, that which Dr.Oates has gi¬ ven us his Oath for; fothat taking it for granted, that there is fucha Projedf on foot, that the Papifis are in the bottom of it, and that it is promoted by the Sectaries,' only as Paffive Jgents that are blindly bringing about the others ends: the Queftion is now how the Govern¬ ment may fairly difcriminate the Protefants from the Papifis ; being fo blended in their Interefi, as well as in their Councils; and mask'tl under fuch Refemblances, the One, of the Other, that they are not eafily to be diftinguifhed. It cannot be expedfed that a pretending Protefiant lhall own himfelf to be a P apifi; fo that there's no believing any man in the Cafe. And then the Epithete of a Reputed fo or fo, is fb (lender an Evidence, that many a Reputed Papiflis found to be a , and many a Reputed Protefiant as true a Vapifl. The known and Legal I Expedient which has been hitherto found Competent enough to an- fwer the Reafon and Intent of State, is the of the Two Oaths of Al¬ legiance and Supremacy: and yet this very provifion will not reach all cafes : For there are many Papifis that will Take them without any difficulty; and there are feverall that call themfelves Protefants, that ' '' ° •. ' '' / - > ' will I 1 . ($5 ; : j > will as obftinately refufe them. Now though the Latter (Primo Eli%. ) was a P rovifion for the abolifhing of Foreign Power, and the Former (Tertio jac.) an Act for the dilcovering and repreffing of Popifh Recufants; the Scope and Equity yet of Both thele Provifions. has a regard to the fe- curing of the Government againft any fort of people, and again ft any Pretenfions whatloever .* So that whoever Refufes, upon a Tender, to take thefe Gathes, he's a Vapijl in the eye of the Law, let his Perfwafion be what it will: For it is the only Priviledge of Omnilci- ence to reade the Heart: or if (for difcourle lake ) we fhould fuppole him to be no Papifi, he is yet in the profped of Common Reafon, liable tothatlmpofition, becauleitisexaded asaProofofhis^K?£W/w, not of his Faith ; and men of Different judgements in Religion may yet agree in Common Principles of Difioyalty, And then again, there's no appealing in this Cafe from the Prudence and Caution of the Law ( which is allways prefum'd to intend the Com¬ mon Good ) to the Teftimony of a Friend or Neighbour in favour of a cufation. For the Law is a General Rule, that takes no notice of any Ex¬ ceptions to it. The Law requires me to Take Thefe Oaths in proof of my Allegiance to the Government; and my anfwer is, that lam a very nejlman, but 1 cannot take them. What is this to the Law,that takes no Cognizance of my Henefiy, but of my Obedience ? And this Rule holds in Common, as well to the ^ apifi as to the Protefiant Recufant; They both vouch for their own Loyalty, and at the lame time they do both of them Refufe to comply with the Law. The Common way of Re¬ ply in this Cale, is to caft it in a mans Teeth ; But what? will you make no difference betwixt a Papift that refufes and a Proteftant ? Yes, I would, if you would but fhew me how I may certainly know the One from the Other. Who knows not that Interejl governs the World ? and that for Realbns beft known to themfelves,he that is aProtefiant in his heart maybe induced rather to appear a P and the Other, though a Papijl in his heart, may find it his Intereft yet to feem a Proteftant ? But we'l yield that Point too; and put the Cale, that the fhould be relax'd, on the behalf of any man living, Does not This open a Gap (let him be never fo Honeft ) to the admittance often Thouland men that may plead Hone fly too, and yet betray their Duties ? And is it not better then, that fome few particulars fhould fuffer by keeping to the/aw, then that the whole fhould be endanger'd by Remitting it I fo that there is neither Reafon nor Safety, nor in fuch a Relax¬ ation, nor any regard of Common jufiice and Duty in demanding it. But what if it be laid, that it is not the Thing Sworn , but the Oath it felf, that is Scrupled ? and that there are feveral forts of Perfwafions that will not bear any fwearing at all ? This I muft confefs, is a Cale fomewhat nice, and unhappy,to thole people that are fo ftraight-lac'd in that Particular: But then, on the Other fide, it is to the Government the mo ft dangerous of all Pretenfions, and lets in all the P riefis zndjefuits in Nature, under That Colour. So that now take it both ways; If the Law be partially Executed, the jefuits and P riefis will Ihelter them- felves under That Indulgence : Or,if the Law fhould be lulpended, out of a refped to thofe that would be thought to make a Confidence of ant I I M \ ' I CO Oath, the Pr'tefis would all flow into Thofe Parties that fhould be exempted from this Tejl,and carry on their Defig without either Triad or danger. Now to wind up this Difoourfe, in a plain and clear Dilemma. It muftbe granted, either that the Tapifts have a Defign upon the King, Religion, and Government, and that they advance it by acting the Parts of Quakers, And'aptifls, Presbyterians, and Other Sectaries, or not. No man, I prefume will dare to Qpeftion the Truth of the Doctors Depofitioh ; for in fo doing he would imply a ftrange abufe impos'd upon the Nati¬ on. But on the other fide, admitting it to be true ; there can be no fe- curity to this Government,without either all feparate or bringing all Difi enters to this Legal Tcfi ; for otherwife, the have all forts of Liberty,and Security in herding tbemfelves among the Conventicles; where upon the beating of a Bufh, it will be an even wa¬ ger whether you ftart a jPefutt, or a JFanatick. And in e fit ft, in this cafe, there is not much difference betwixt them, where the plays the Fanatick, and the Fanatickthejfefuit. \ If the main affertion be true, there's no way of finding out the , but by thisTeJl .-and theDijfenters tbemfelves, if they would have Popery ferretted out in good Earneft, cannot chufe but encou j age the Propofi- tion. Either they haveVriejls among them or they have : If they , why do they not do the belt they can to find them out ? i.f they have not, why do they lay they have ? And again, either the Ncn-Ccnformijls are influenc'd by the fefuits or they are not: If they be, why do they not do all that is poflible toward the V urging of their Congregations? If they be not fo Influenc'd, why do they pretend that they are, and fofet the Sad¬ dle upon the wrong Horfe ? And yet again ; either it isto clear their Conventicles of this dangerous Mixture, or it is net: If it be Peffible, w hy dotheyftill complain of it, and d o nothing int ? If it be there is no way of Extirpating Popery, but by rooting out fanaticism. Let the World judge now, with what in juftice, the Order, and the Ri- tualls of the Church of England are charg'd with a Tincture of Super(li- tton, and Popery, when upon Manifeft proof, the Calumniators themjelves of our Ecclefiaftical State zxc, throughout the whole Body ofthem, tainted with this Leaven. We are now come to the Bottcm of the P P This Liberty of wandering from the Rule,is the Trojan Horfe, under a Religi¬ ous colour, we have entertained within cur Walls \with Difcord, and De- ftruftion in theBelly of him. An ADVERTISEMENT. W. Hereas the Subjects Right of Petitioning has been of Late infuch tfd, as if his Ma jefty had no Right e/Refilling, this is to Jdvtrtife, that from the %doffA. 3. to Hen. 8.( as appearsupon the Parliament Rolls )it was conf ant ly the Firfi thing done, upon the opening of all Parliaments, after the Caufe cf Summons decJar d, to ap¬ point out of the Lords Spiritual, and T emporal,e« tans Receivers, and Trycrs oil etiti- om-,andfill as they found any Petition not fit to he admitted,it was Rejeded Ncn eft Petitio Parliament^ ( as we find it endorfed upon the Rolls there was an end Note, that all Petitions were Dedicated to his Majefty,and that in many Cafes, when the Parliament had not time to go thorough with them all,the King referred diverfe cf them to the Chancery. Now why the King may not as well Rejeft a retiticn Cut of Psrlian cnt, as In Pa r" if lrent, and icly he may not as zvell Rcjcft it by Anticipation, andPievcn tjon tnehwievsandErpicfsPn hibiticn and Exceptions the Matter uf it] asafteiward,w a point worthy cf a 1 cjc/nticn :atid vilunlis Majcilv citr loft the One Eight, or the Subjcfi. gain'd tic Oder: to tic of This Vampklet, but more accommodate to the Seaje.tr. The End. \ ■ 1 - - r—~ ~ r '3J . V x r - .,• . t «•• ■ tv.- . , . ' ' * /' 1 ' ■ ' .■j? /. :T* • .y&vv* • Kr '.'I' ?3s'H \ I. • c u i i \. v 6. » , . ' V- ' ) . . i j i \ < i . . ■ • • ■ * i \ ■ , •. ' ' • ' ■; - % ■' ■ *1 V *■ ■ ■ ... - ' ■ c \ • ' * ' ■is j ■ "" v r v' f ' < - ' , t L ) ' ' - • ( / . . < ' - / ' , ; i ■ k i J t y * % ' ' . ' "'V - . ■ « * > ) ! r ••• <, • , ■ ■ ■ : . _ i ♦ ,4 - •• . ■ - . ' . ■ -V \ / . s I ■ ■ J : '. * . ! w -