LIBRARY err RIKCnCN NOV 2 8 aiB THLCLOGiCAL SEf- iNARY THE POURTRAICTURE OF HIS SACRED MAJESTIE IN ^ HIS SOLITUDES AND SUFFERINGS. A REPRINT OF THE EDITION OF 1648, AND A FACSIMILE OF THE ORIGINAL FRONTISPIECE, WITH AN INTRODUCTION THROWING FRESH LIGHT UPON THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE WORK EDWARD J. L. SCOTT, M.A., OXON., Assistant Keeper of MSS-, British Museum. LONDON : ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW, EC. 1880. PEEFACE. The history of Eikon Basilike has been so often written, and the merits and capabilities of tlie two persons to whom the authorship has been attributed for producing such a work have been so fully tested and considered by their various supporters on either side, that it may seem un- necessary and almost impertinent to attempt to say anything on so threadbare a subject. Bat the latest writer who has given an opinion on the case carries such weight in his name, and is so likely to be accepted as an authority on this point, that it is all the more to be desired that his views, if incorrect, should be challenged, and where possible refuted. In a monograph on Milton, just issued, for the series of English Men of Letters, is a brief account in four pages of Eikon Basilike, wherein are reproduced all the blunders and misstatements which it was the laborious task of Dr. Wordsworth, fifty years ago, to expose and confute. Indeed, his masterly letters to the Archbishop of Canterbury might as well have never been written, and he might have spared himself the trouble of replying to Todd, Broughton, Lingard, Hallani, and the rest of his able and ingenious opponents. We are told once more in direct terms that the hook ivas composed hy Dr. Gauden. Of this, however, no proof is adduced, but the writer adds that it is possihle thai Gauden may have had in his hands some icritten scraps of the King's meditations. This is rather in favour of the King, as it allows him some original meditations, a point generally A 2 IV PREFACE. contested by his enemies, and very damaging to Gauden, because the latter distinctly denies that he owed anything whatever to his rival ; the book and figure, he says, being wholly and only his own invention, making, and design. We are told on the next page that though a Royalist, Gauden sat in the JFestminster Assembly. If this be so, how comes Professor Masson, in his exhaustive list of the men who composed that Assembly, to have omitted the name of so distinguished a Royalist (there were not many, it may be imagined, of that class in that august body) as Gauden ? And further, he took the Covenant, for which compliance he nearly lost the reivard ivhich after the Restoration became his due. If there is one point about Gauden which is doubtful, it is whether he ever took the Covenant ; and he is believed to have denied that he did so. The readers of Eikon Basilike never doubted that the meditations tvere those of the royal martyr. What becomes then of the first controversy which raged so fiercely in 1649 as to the authorship of the book, and which produced so many pamphlets on both sides for and against the King, such as the " Princely Pelican" and many others '] Two pages further on we are told that the plagiarism of the prayer from Sidney's "Arcadia" ought to have opened Milton's eyes to the unauthentic character of the Eikon. What had a subsequent appendix to the Eikon (the prayers being no part of the first edition, but added afterwards to later ones) to do with the authentic character of a work of which at tlie time of publication they formed no portion"? The secret of the authorship of the "Eikon" ivas icell kept, being knotvn only to a very few persons — the two royal brothers, Bishop Morley, the Earl of Bristol, and Clarendon. If we are to believe Gauden's own words, the only one of these persons who knew it was Bishop Morley, and he, as I shall shortly prove, never for one moment attributed the work to any but Charles I., from the date of its appearance in 1649 to PREFACE. V his death in 1684. It is true that Gauden frequently appealed to Morley's knowledge of it, but there is not a word from Morley to prove that he knew it. Gauden plainly tells us that the two royal brothers first learnt the secret from himself in the end of 1660, and that he was not made a Bishop on that account, a fact which Mrs. Gauden is also equally positive about ; and yet we are now told he pleaded it successfully as a claim to preferment at the Restoration, and he received the bishopric of JExeter. "Why, so far different is the truth, that he was actually nominated as a fit person to fill a see in 1658, two years before he ever made his claim at all. Clarendon and Bristol both, according to Gauden's own letters, are made acquainted with the secret after the Eestoration, when he is already Bishop of Exeter. Such is the latest account of the Eikon Basilike, and of the circumstances attending its production ; but as all these points have long ago been satisfactorily cleared up and settled by Dr. Wordsworth, it is only necessary now, in writing a Preface for a New Edition, to bring before the notice of the public any fresh evidence which may have turned up during the last fifty years. As Dr. Wordsworth confidently prophesied at the close of his labours that such evidence would come to light in the course of time, and that it would be wholly for the King and against Gauden, so his prophecy has been verified to a great extent, and will no doubt some day be completely fulfilled. There are two grounds on which this question has generally been disputed : 1st, the internal; 2nd, the external evidence. On both these heads something new may be said ; and 1st, as to the internal. To begin with the title page. It has never been noticed that wdiile the first edition has the date ♦' MDCXLVIII." alone, all later editions before 25th March, 1649 have the words "Reprinted in R[egis] M[emoriam] 1648," This is strong evidence in support of the statement VI PREFACE. that the Eikon was first ])rinted (but not published) during the King's life. This is one point against Gauden, for his wife declares that he could not get it printed until some few days after the King's death. If Charles I. was dead at the time of the printing of the title page of the Eikon, that work could not have been entitled the Portraiture of his Majesty, but of his late Majesty. Next, as to the frontispiece. Here there are three or four new points to be noticed. The emblems in it are taken from different parts of the Eihon itself, such as the crowns of gold and of lead, from the end of Chapter VI.; the metaphor of the sea raging when stormy winds blow upon it, from Chapter IV.; and many others. Next, the verses beneath the frontispiece, being the explanation of it, bear the signature G. D., which Todd explains to mean G[auden] D[esigned], or G[auden], D[ean of Bocking]. But Dr. Wordsworth, on the other hand, says these initials must stand for G[ulielmus] D[ugard], the printer of one edition of the Eikon ; and that he is right in so saying is proved by the discovery of the diar}^ (now in the British Museum, Add. MS. 23,146) of Dugard's brother Thomas, who throughout it uses that remarkable and striking capital D, which is also found in Dugard's earlier edition of the Eikon. This copy is now m the hands of the Eev. Thomas Ford Fenn, Head Master of Treat College, near Nottingham. In another early copy, of 1648[9], from Dugard's press, in the possession of Mrs. Manson, of Musvvell Hill, these ex- planatory verses are not pinted, but engraved from the hand- writing of their author, and bear no shadow of resemblance to Gaudea's hand, but are written in the style of a school- master's copies ; and William Dugard was High Master of St. Paul's Grammar School. Again, it has not been noticed that the Greek motto at the foot of the frontispiece, to x^ ov^ev r^StKT^cre ttjv ttoXlv ovSe to KctTTTra, which Gauden, PREFACE. VU in his sermon on the 30th January, 1648[9], refers to Constantine, has really no reference whatever to that Emperor, but to Constantius, for Julian the Apostate, from whose Misopogon this line is quoted, is speaking of the time when he himself was made Caesar. This sermon directly attributes the Eihm to Charles I.; and it is absolutely impossible that Gauden, the writer of it, should have misunderstood and misapplied the quotation which, as Gauden, the author of the Eikon, he had made use of only a year before. Another point on which great stress has been laid by both parties in their arguments is the fact that the first couplet of the explanation of the frontispiece presents the very words in English which in Latin close the Eikon, viz., " Vota dabunt qum hella negarunf,'' and that this Latin motto is found at the end of a poem called " Majesty in Misery," composed by Charles L at Carisbrook. But no one has apparently noticed that all three come from one and the same place, viz., the concluding words of Chapter XVIII. of the Eikon itself, ^' What we could not get by our treaties we may gain by our prayers." Consequently, as the verses appear first in Dugard's edition of the frontispiece, so does the motto at the close of his edition, being, no doubt, added by himself. The truth is that this comparison of the various editions of the work has never hitherto been attempted, and yet, if closely followed up, would inevitably lead to most important results as to the real authorship. Let all copies now known to exist be collected together, and collated carefully one with another, and who can say what further evidence would not instantly be elicited, which might set this unhappy question at rest for ever. The British Museum alone possesses twenty-five copies, the Lambeth Library four, and so on, many of which contain manuscript notes and memoranda hitherto unpublished. There is one piece of interniil evidence in favour of Viii PREFACE. Charles I. which has never yet been adduced, and that is a comparison of the apophthegmata in the Eikon with those composed by the King, and written with his own hand in his copy of Bacon's Advancement of Learning (in- terpreted by Gilbert Wats, Oxford, 1640), now in the British Museum. This book is exhibited under glass in a case in the King's library, and yet has remained all these years unnoticed and unquoted. They are so very important that the whole of them are subjoined here in order that future readers of the Eikon may find out the parallel passages for themselves. They occur in Book VI., pp. 300 — 323, where examples of the Antitheta are given under various headings, pro et contra, such as Nobility, Beauty, Youth, &c. Health IV. Pro. " None so truly knowes the value of Healthe as those who want it." Praise Reputation IX. Pro. "Reward is nothing but reall Praise." Life XII. Pro. " If long Lyfe were not a great Blessing, God had neuer offerd it as a reward to Mankynde." Superstition XIII. Pro. "If a Man, by eschewing superstition, grow to be Profaine, what hath he gotten ? " Pride XIV. Contra. " Pride made Angels Deuils." preface. ix Envy XVL Contra. " All Enuy proceeds from a knowen selfe im worthiness." Cruelty XVIII. Cojitra. " None but Cowards are cruell." Vainglory XIX. Contra. " Vaine glorious Persons are neuer satisfied, though they obtaine what they desyer, as thinking their Merit beyond theire owen imagination." Fortitude XXI. Pro. "A feareful Man wants but occasion to be Vitius." Temperance XXII. Pro. " Temperance rewards a man wlien he least thinks of it." Constancy XXI 11. Contra. " Varietie is this World's delight." Magnanimity XXIV. Contra. " How can that be a Virtue which is built upon Vyce ? " Knowledge Contemplation XXV. Pro. *' Knowledge giues lyke Pleasure to the Mynde w'^'* Venus doth to the Body." Learning XXVI. Pro. "Naturall Witt, destitute of Learning, is but lyke unpolished Marble." X PREFACE. Loquacity XXXI. Contra. " Few great Talkers are good Doers." BOLDNESSE XXXIII. Contra. " None but Fooles or ill-bred Men are Impudent." Jeasts XXXV. Contra. "Dull jesters are contemned, & those who are witty are more hated then praised." Love XXXVI. Pro. "Love is the Mother of all noble Actions." Innovation XL. Pro. '' [He that will not apply new remedies] must neuer cure new Diseases." Contra. " He that Innouats hath need to be verry Wyse, for he taxes all Men of Ignorance," Violent Consils XLIV. Contra. "Nothing but a desperat Disease can tollerat a violent Remedy." Suspicion XLV. Contra. " Suspition is incompatible with true frendship. Sus- pition allwais proceedeth eather from Feare or Gilt." All these apophthegms strike one on reading them at first as extremely similar in style and expression to those scattered throughout the pages of the Eikon ; for instance, at the beginning of Chapter XVI. of that work occurs the fol- PREFACE. XI lowing sentence : "So hardly can the pride of those that study- novelties allow former times any share or degree of wisdom or godliness." Compare with this the entry by Charles with his own hand in Bacon's work under the head of Innovation, "He that Innovats hath need to beverry Wyse, for he taxes all men of Ignorance." To sum up, therefore, the new evidence in favour of the King and against Gauden, gathered from the internal proofs, we have : — 1st, The inference (from the title-page of the King not being styled his late Majesty, coupled with the simple date, "1648," in place of " Reprinted in Kegis Memoriam. 1648 ; ") that the book was printed during his lifetime, the Gauden story being that it was not printed until after his death. 2nd, The fact of the frontispiece being the representation of various metaphors in the pages of the work, a point to which Gauden never alludes in support of his claim to be the author of both book and figure. 3rd, The explanation of the letters G. D. at the foot of the verses to be Gulielmus Dugard, not Gauden Designed, or Gauden, Dean of Bocking. 4th, The true origin of the line, " If prayers can give me what the wars deny," or " Vota dahiint quos hella negarunt,'^ to be found in Chapter XVIII. of the Eikon. 5th, The handwriting of the explanation of the emblem is not that of Gauden, but is in the style of a schoolmaster, which Dugard was. 6th, The blunder of Gauden himself about the Greek motto below the verses referring to Constantine instead of Constantius in his sermon on the 30th January, 1649/50, wherein he distinctly assigns the book to Charles I. 7th, The comparison of the sentences written by the King's own hand in his copy of Bacon's Advancement of Learning (a book which Gauden could never have seen until after Charles's death) with the style and method of composition of the Eikon itself. Now to turn to the external evidence that has come to XU PREFACE. light during the fifty years that have elapsed since Dr. Wordsworth gave to the world the result of his laborious research into this subject. One of the most valuable testimonies to the existence of a " Naseby copy" (i.e. a copy of the first seven chapters of the Eikon, which is said to have been taken by the Parliamentary forces, along with the Koyal papers after the battle of Naseby), has lately turned up in the library at Lambeth Palace, where is preserved the copy of this work, formerly in the possession of Archbishop Tenison. On the last page in the Autograph of the owner is the following Memorandum. "D[octor] Mew, L[ord] Bpshop] of Winchester, had often told me (& he repeated it again before y B[ishop] of Peterburgh in y^ B[isho]ps Cha[m]ber on Jan. 30th, 169^, bef[ore] we went to West[minster] Abbey, that at Naseby- fight he saw y^ K[ing]s Closet Keeper before y^ fight began carry out the Kings papers to y^ Camp ; & y* aft[e]r y^ Fight he saw divers of them torn, & amo[n]gst these fragm[en]ts took up some pieces of £k-[wv] ^aa[i\iKr)] written with y' Kings own hand Tho[mas] Cantuarpensis]." The existence of this Naseby copy has always been considered to be fatal to Gauden's claim, as he declared that he began to compose the Eikon in or about the year 1647, and all his supporters are unanimous in saying that the only papers lost by the King at Naseby were those published by the Parliament, and among these is no trace of the Eikon. Many of the arguments are based on the fact that no mention is found of Eikon- Basilike in any books or correspondence previous to the King's death; but this is manifestly absurd, because the work only received its Greek title at the time of its publication. Dr. Words- worth produced no less than nine evidences in favour of a Naseby copy, but taken collectively they are not so weighty PREFACE. Xlll or decisive as this newly-found Memorandum. It is very- strange that Todd, who was Librarian at Lambeth Palace, should have mentioned two copies of the book as being in the library, and yet should have said nothing of Arch- bishop Tenison's copy, however damaging to the cause he was seeking to uphold. As however the edition is not an English one, but the Latin translation by Bishop Earle, he may have overlooked it altogether. One argument against the chronological arrangement of the Eikon is that events occur in chapters subsequent to the time at which they were apparently composed, and it has been answered that such circumstance is to be explained by the habit of the King to correct and retouch the part already written. But Bishop Mew furnishes us with another and better reason, viz., that the first seven chapters were so injured at the battle of Naseby, that the King must have rewritten them from the recovered fragments, and would naturally have added and altered many passages. Some considerable evidence, hitherto unknown, has also been found among the j^apers and official correspondence of Sir Edward Nicholas, Secretary of State to Charles I. and Charles II., which have been lately acquired by the British Museum. He was one of the most confidential servants of the former monarch, and their ciphered correspondence was published by W. Bray in 1818, in his Evelyn Memoirs from the originals in the Evelyn library at Wotton. Half, however, of the letters had never found their way to Wotton, but had remained at West Horseley, in Surrey, the ancient seat of the Nicholas family, and among them are six papers relating to the Eikon, a seventh having been found by Bray, at Wotton ; and an eighth of the same series having been published by Wagstaffe in his Vindication of King Charles the Martyr. It will be necessary for the better understanding of the allusions in the new correspondence XIV PREFACE. to first give a copy of the letter at Wotton, which is slightly earlier than the others. Paris, Nov. 6, 1649, St. No. Sir, To giue you an account of the vastnesse of this Packett, give me leaue to tell you that together with this booke which I send you there came in half a score persons of consideration, who with very much passion, desired me to represent to Jersey the high indignity by this base edition offered to our blessed Master, and the great injury rendered to his Majesty that now is. You will finde a Preface to this Booke which tends to proue that our blessed Master might be, nay, perhaps was a Papist in his heart, notwithstanding this Booke. That what instructions and commands were giuen to his sonne for his firmenesse to the Protestant Religion, were giuen out of politique considerations meerely, and many other particulars which I hope will bring it to the hands of the common hangman. This Marsys is one who setting out the tryall of the late King, and the manner of his murther stiles himselfe " Interprete et Maistre pour la langue Francoise du Roy d'Angleterre regnant a present et de son Altesse Royal e le Due d'Yorke son frere" in which Booke he stiles Queene Elizabeth (of euer blessed memory) Jezabell. He sets downe a false and faigned speech of the Kings at the time of his being murthered ; & being charged with it, he said he thought fitt to make that speech as spoken by him since the speech he did make was poore and belowe a King. He hath sett forth diuers other things, an extract whereof I shall shortly send you, the least of which would deserue a whipping in England in good times to speake moderately. I presume you will giue this business a thorough sifting there in Councell, and send some directions to Sir Richard Browne how to proceede here. That it may appeare who sett him on worke here, and who giues him these exact coppies which he pretends to haue under the Kings owne hand. And those other peeces of the Kings which he so braggs of, and promises he will bring them to light, so soone as he obtaines leaue to publish them. I PREFACE. XV hope some course wilbe taken that he may be discharged of his titles of relation to the King, and that his Majesty will hereupon giue order that a true coppy may be printed in French of his Fathers Booke, declared by him to be authentique, waving both the editions either of Huguenot or Papist, and that this command be grounded upon the ill Editions of both these Persons and Partys. Indorsed "6° Novem : 1649. Concerning Marseis, his translacion of the Kings Booke." This letter, as printed by Bray, has no signature to it, which has led him to propound a false conjecture as to the writer of it in his note upon its contents. He says, "If it were necessary to enter upon the controversy respecting the authenticity of Eikon BasUike, this letter might be adduced as a proof against Bishop Gauden's claim to that work. The wish here expressed was not fulfilled specifically ; though afterwards in some measure gratified by the publica- tion of Eikon Aklastos in 1651, as a vindication of the oriojinal work asrainst the attacks of Eikonoklastes. This letter," he goes on, " was written by Sir Edward Nicholas during his retreat from England after the death of his royal master. He appears to have been then resident with his son-in-law, Sir Richard Browne, who still remained charg^ d'affaires at the French Court." This, of course, is an absurd mistake ; the letter in question being not from but to Nicholas, who was then at Jersey with Charles II. If Bray thought this letter might be adduced as a proof against Gauden's claim, what would he have said had he afterwards discovered the subsequent letter with its two enclosures, which was the direct result of this anonymous appeal. Between the date of the first letter on 6 November, 1649, and the date of the earliest newly discovered one on 4th January, 1650, there appears to have been a letter of the 23 November from Nicholas, written in consequence of the first communication and addressed to Sir Christopher XVI PREFACE. Hatton, Sir Richard Browne, John Cosin, Dean of Peter- borough, and George Morley afterwards Bishop of Win- chester, all at this time resident at Paris. This letter apparently has not survived to the present day, or else it is hidden in the private papers of some old family, and will come to liolit at a future time. Its loss is much to be regretted, as it must have materially strengthened the evidence for Charles I. In consequence of this letter, Sir C. Hatton, Sir R. Browne, Dean Cosin and Morley seem to have sought an interview with Marsys, and which he avoided, until on 4th January, 1650, they are able to announce to Nicholas that they have at last succeeded in speaking with Monsieur Marsys, and they give a lengthy but extremely interesting and valuable account of their proceedings. We learn from their letter that so great was the demand for a French Edition of the Eikon, that four thousand copies of a translation by a Monsieur Porree were already sold within twelve months after the King's deatk In the instructions to Sir R. Browne (the draft of which the writers of the letter forward to Nicholas for the Royal approval and signature), Charles 11. is made to declare in most distinct and precise words, his belief in his father being the author of the Eikon, and one or two words have been added to or corrected in the draft in Nicholas' own hand, proving thereby that it was taken into consideration and acted upon. These additional words are here printed in italics, to draw the reader's attention to them. The second enclosure is also curious and very interesting, especially the remark that Queen Henrietta Maria flung away Marsy's Histoire de la Persecution presente des Catholiques d'Angleterre near the time of the first edition on account of the false and slanderous passages against her honour in his Epistle dedicatory unto her. The following is the letter with its two enclosures : PREFACE. XVU Sir, In obedience to his Ma*'" Commands signified vnto us in yours of the 13/23 Nov' wee haae at last spoken witlt Mons"" Marsys (after some delayes on his Part) To whome wee represented his Ma*'" Just sense and Indignation against the Preface, Title Page, References, and notes annexed to his Translation and Edition of the Booke written by his late Ma*'^ of euer blessed Memory. Wee asked him upon what grounds, and by whose incouragement, priuity, or advice he presumed to put forth the Advertisement, Preface, and Notes upon that Trans- lation, so boldly and scandalously insinuating that his late Ma*'^ was enclining to Popery. To which he answered that as he had not been put upon this Worke by any, so had not any person been made aquainted therewith by him before the Impression of his Booke ; but that upon generall Conference with those Protestants, and Roman Catholiques, with whome he had conversed, it was thought more advantagious to represent the late King a Roman Catholique then a Puritan as they conceiued Porree had done, in regard, that it might be a meanes to stirre up the Romish Partie to helpe, and assist his Ma*'^ that now is ; which would be of greater Concernement then any thing the Calvinists or Huguenotts would doe. He further added, That at his first vnder- taking he had no intention to Prefixe any Preface, or adde any notes to his Edition, but that he was afterwards prouoked thereunto upon the Sight of Mons"" Porrees Preface and wilfull Faults in his Translation. Wee demanded of him ; First, wliy he called the Booke intituled Le Portraict du Roy vn liure Apost6 et Ditfama- toire, which wee and all others (but himselfe) conceiued To be the Right and true translation of tiKojv ^aaiXiKri the same being the Title affixed to that Booke when it was first printed in England, and therein translated. The Portraiture of his Sacred Ma'''^ as it was likewise rendred Imago Regis Caroli in the Latin Edition set forth in Holland, by the Approbation of his Ma*'^ that now is, Marsys himselfe hauing no other Copie to translate by, B XVlll PREFACE. then those Two that had the same Title, which he calls Aposte, &c. And secondly being demanded, why he had not Suppress'd his new Imposed Title, together with his slanderous and bold assertion concerning the Former, which he might haue timely done upon the early Admo- nition of Sir Eichard Browne, giuen him the day after the Titles of his Booke were first affixed to the publique Places of this Cittie, and before any of the Copies were deliuered out at the Printing-house, it being then likewise represented vnto him that in his new Title Page, He did not Charge the Booke entituled le Portrait du Eoy &c. to be an ill Translated Booke but a meere Supposititious Booke, and that advantage would from hence be taken, in England, to increase, if not Confirme their Scandalls who gaue it out that tiKwv (SatTLXiKTi was not written by the late King ; w^ierein his boldnesse had been also the greater, in that he had so excessiuely vilified that Edition, which he knew his Ma^'^ that now is by his Gracious Expressions, in his Royal Letters to Mons' Porree had well accepted of, in regard both of his Paines and his early readinesse to render that excellent Booke vnto his owne nation in their owne Tongue, although through haste and want of a perfect vuderstandiug in the English Tongue some errours and faultes might escape him in that Translation. His answer to all this was. First, that Porr6e had not truly translated the Title of e'lKujv /3ao-iXiK^ because to Portrait du Roy he had added these words De la Grand' Bretaigne and that thereupon he tooke his advantage to condemne the Booke that bare the Title of Portrait du Roy de la Grand Bretaigne. Secondly he said That (notwith- standing the aforesaid Admonition) the prevailing reason with him, not to suppresse or alter the Title of his Booke, was, because he thought he should haue lost much by it, if he had so done, his primarie Intention being, by this alteration of the Title, to make his owne Edition more vendible and hinder the Sale of Porr^es, adding that it repented him he had not done it sooner, in regard there were foure thousand of Porrees Copies already disperst ; and that those, with whome he conversed, advised him to goe on, with his former designe, notwithstanding S' Richard Browne's Admonition. PREFACE. XIX Being by us demanded, by what Authority he assumed to himselfe, in the Title Page before some of his Printed Bookes, the Style of Interprete & Maistre pour la langue Frangoise du Roy d'Angleterre regnant a present et de son Altesse Poyal Monseigneur le Due d'Yorke son frere. He answered he did assume to himselfe that Title by reason he had the Hon' to read French to his Ma**^ that now is, when he was Prince of Wales, and was also assigned to the same Employment towards his Highnesse the Duke of Yorke. Whilst we were in the prosecution of this Businesse, my Lord Bishop of Galloway (who accidentaly came in upon a Visit) desyred he might lay it to Marsys Charge, the wronge and Scandall he had done to the Royall Partie of the Scotts by applying to the Whole Nation what the King in the Beginning of the 23 Chapter of his Booke restraines onely to Those that deliuered him up : And he accused Marsys to be an unfaithfull Translator, in positiuely rendring what the King suppositiuely speakes. For whereas in the English the Kings words are Those Scotts and the Latin hath it right Istos Scotos and Mons"" Porr(^e truly renders it Ces Escossois, Marsys makes it indefinite Escossois and whereas the King saith, If I am sold, wherevnto the Latin Translation agreeth expressing it Si ab ijs Divendar and Mons"" Porr^e likewise truly renders it Si je suis vendu. And although all the Kings loyall Scotch Partie, and amongst them my Lord Byshop himselfe (as he saith) might and doe belieue in their Perticular Judgements, that the King was Sold by that partie of Scotts which deliuered Him up. Yet Mons' Marsys had he been a faithfull Translator of the Kings owne words, ought not to haue taken upon him the Libertie to leaue out those Limitations and Conditions wherewith it pleased his Ma''^ to expresse himselfe and by his vnfaithfull Translation render his Ma^'^* expressions to importe that the whole Scottish nation was guilty of having absolutely sold their King. Wherevnto Mons' Marsys (acknowledging that he had for this already been by some Scotchmen publiquely challenged and Questioned in the Streets and threaten'd with Blowes, and indeed not being able to Justifie the Fidelity of his Translation of which he had so much B 2 XX PREFACE. boasted, both in his Preface and elsewhere) answered, that He had already resolued to make an Apology for himselfe in that particular onely which he intended to Publish in Print. We held it not amisse to Charge him further with some of those great Tnsolencies he hath Committed in all other the Bookes published in his Name, in particular. That in his Booke intituled A Narration of the Tryal and Murder of the late King (in which he had giuen himselfe the Title of Interprete & Maistre de la langue &c.) he calleth Queen Elisabeth an Impious Jezabell with other base expressions concerning Her, And taketh his liberty not onely to alter and omitt many parts of his Ma*'^' Speech vsed at the tyme of his Murder of purpose leaning out those pious expressions which testifyed to the world in what Religion that blessed and Royal! Martyr dyed ; but likewise to adde of his owne feigning what he thought fitt; and to represent his Sacred Ma*'^ as then expressing himselfe in such Language and Passion whereof the very Rebells and Murderers themselues neuer accused him. In his Booke intituled Histoire de la Persecution presente des Catholiques d'Angleterre (to which he makes his Marginall Renvoys throughout all the Kings Booke) wee shewed him what vnfitt and scurrilous Language he had vttered of King James of euer blessed Memory, Grandfather to our Soueraigne that now is and of other his Royall Predecessours &c. (some particulars whereof are lined out in the Booke which w^ee now send) together with many other Passages concerning the Protestants of the Church of England, and the publique Lawes of that Kingdome, very Scandalous to be read and full of Falsehood. To all which he answered, That he held himselfe obliged so to speake as he had done of Queen Elisabeth, King -James &c. as he was a Roman Catholique and that what he ]md sayd of Protestants referred to the tymes of Queen Elisabeth and King James in which all the Protestants were of that Temper wherein he represented them, which Answer we conceiue to be a great Aggrauation of his Offence by extending those his false and Scandalous ex- PREFACE. XXI pressions to all the Members of the Church of England who liued or dyed during the Keignes of those two famous Princes. And whereas we are commanded to vse our best endeauours to make stay of the Publishing of the said Translation and Preface ; Wee beseech you to represent t o his Ma*'^^ Consideration, That it cannot be expected wee should obteine the Fauour of the State here to Suppresse this Booke euen for that very Reason for which wee would suppresse it, which is the Dresse he hath giuen it to fitt the Popish Interest ; and if this might haue been hoped it had not been now to be acted, as it hath not been vnconsidered. But there are already so many Copies dispersed that to ejEFace this malitious Scandall Some other course must be taken. Hauing thus sent you this Accompt of the matter of Fact to the end you may in forme his Ma*'^ of our Proceedings herein ; wee shall in the next place obey his Ma*'''* Commands to certifie what upon Consideration of the whole Businesse we humbly Conceiue fit to be done in it. We therefore humbly offer as the onely expedient in our Judgement, upon the daily experience of the mischeivous Consequences both here and in England of these Insolencyes of Marsys ; That his Ma*"' will be pleased with the advice of his Councell to put in execution what this Inclosed Letter doth purport, and send the same Vnder his Royall fSignet conteyning his commands and Directions in this Businesse vnto S' Richard Browne as his Resident and Publique Minister in this Place, which letter wee haue drawne up in obedience to his Ma*'*^ Commands, signified vnto us by one of yours of a late date. And this w^e humbly conceiue to be the onely way now left to repaire the Injuries done by this Marsys and sufficiently to Righte his Ma*'^ in his Pious vindication, not onely of his blessed Father but likewise of his other Royall Predecessours, and Progenitors, together with his own Religious, Pious, and Royall Disposition and Intention. Which we humbly beseech you to present to his Ma''" as a Testimony of our Obedience to his Commands and a XXll PREFACE. Pledge of our Zeale to the euer blessed Memory of our late Royal and blessed Master. And so wishing you all health and Happinesse we liemaine S' Your most humble Servants Paris 4*^ January. Anno. 1650. s°. n^ Chr : Hatton. Richard Browne. Jo: Cosin. Geor: Morley. '^ Right " Trusty and Welbeloued, — Whereas wee haue been informed by diners Persons (uppon their obseruation of the publishing and vttering so large a Proportion of that Booke, which was written by our Father of euer blessed Memory, and entituled tlKiov jSaaiXiKi) hauing now passed three Impressions in the French Tongue in Rouen and Paris) That the said Booke is very acceptable vnto the French Nation and much approued and Desired by them in Generall ; To the end that Right may be done to the said Booke and satisfaction to all such who justly esteeme and Value it, we haue thought it agreable to the great Regard and tender Affection wee beare to the Memory and Honour of our most dear and blessed iFather and to the Right Information of all those who desire to read and make vse of the Truth wisedome and Piety which is Conteyned in that Booke to take into our Consideration the Seuerall Translations already made thereof into the French tongue wherein wee find that of Monsieur Porrees entituled le Portrait du Roy de la Grand Bretaigne (being a True expression of the Title of our late Fathers Booke) first Printed at Rouen to haue had some mistakings, "and Errours " in it, which (as we belieue) escaped him, through haste, and for want of a perfect vnderstanding of the English Tongue, although wee doubt not but his meaning and Intentions were good wliich wee haue accordingly accepted from him ; But whereas there is another pretended Translation, and Edition, set forth by one of that Nation calling himselfe, Le Sieur de Marsys to which he feigns a Title of his owne Invention as followeth ; les Memoires du feu Roy de la Grand Bretaigne Charles premier escrits de sa PREFACE. XXlll propre main dans sa prison. Ou il est monstre que le liure intitule Portrait du Roy de la Grand Bretaigne est vn liure Apost6 et difFamatoire. Traduits de I'Anglois en nostre Langue par le Sieur du Marsys & enricliis d' Annotations & de Renuois tres necessaires pour I'lnteligence de I'Ouurage. Wee haue seriously considered thereof and forasmuch as wee find that the said Marsys hath not onely boldly altered the True Title of our Deare Fathers Booke (which being stiled e'lKOJv (SaaiXiKT] is not vnproperly translated by Mon- sieur Porree le Portrait du Roy de la Grand Bretagne) but likewise insolently averred in his owne New Title Page that the former Booke intituled (as it ought to be) is A Suposititious "Booke" and defamatory Booke, meerely out of an vnworthy designe by his owne Confession to hinder the Sale of Monsieur Porrees Edition, and to deceiue the Buyers by making them belieue that this Edition of his is a new distinct Booke from that sett forth by Monsieur Porree ; And further that the said Marsys hath annexed to the said Booke an Advertisement wherein are many things Scandalous to the Royall Person and Honour of our late ffather ; and that he hath been likewise vnfaithfull in his Translation of some particulars, and amongst others of that which concerneth the Scotts whereby he hath cast an Infamy upon the whole Scottish Nation ; and hath more- ouer added many malitious Annotations together with diuers Renuois to an Insolent Booke formerly printed by him wee haue therefore thought fitt to declare our just Indignation against this his Edition, and to disclaime it. And whereas this Marsys hath in another Booke intituled a Narration of the Tryall and Murder of the late King (our deare and blessed ffather) taken his licentious liberty to stile himselfe Interprete & Maistre pour la langue Fran(joise du Roy d'Angleterre Regnant a present et de son Altesse Royale Monseigneur le Due d'Yorke (which wee neuer allowed him) and in the same Booke not onely with false and vnseemely Language to abuse the Person of Queen Elisabeth of Blessed Memory, but to injure also our Deare and blessed Ifather by altering the Speech which at the time of his Murther and Marty redome he vttered to the People, therein leaning out particulars of greatest moment Concern- ing his HoDour and representing him with such Language XXIV PREFACE. and passion as was much different from that Ma*'** and Christian Piety wherewith he vnderwent that his Cruel and barbarous Martyredome and whereas a third Booke sett forth vnder the said Marsys name hath likewise come to our View intituled Histoire de la Persecution present des Catholiques d'Angleterre, &c.; wherein besides his insolent and malitious Aspersions cast upon other of our Predeces- sours in the Crowne of England he hath likewise with very false, and Scandalous language abused the Person, and Actions of our most deare Grandfather King James of euer blessed Memory, and throughout the greater part of that whole Booke hath shewed little else but his owne Boldnesse and Ignorance. Therefore (all these foregoeing Particulars Considered) wee haue by the advice of our Councell caused the two last forementioned Bookes set forth in the said Marsys name, together withe the Title Advertisement Notes and Renvoys of the other Booke entituled Les Memoires Sec. being stiled from our fathers said Booke to be publiquely burnt in our Isle of Jersey by the Hande of the Common Hangman. And wee doe disavow the said Marsys to haue any Relation to our Service enioyning you to discharge him from assuming to himselfe any title of dependanee upon us or our Brother the Duke of Yorke. And to the end that so Inestimable a Jewell as our Fathers Booke is may be rendred to that Nation where you Reside for us, and who entertaine it with due value and esteeme as neere the Pure originall Lustre as may bee, wee haue thought fitt to giue order for a Translation and an Edition thereof to be prepared and Set forth b}^ Mons^ Testard one of the Pastors of Bloys, an able learned man and well affected both to our blessed ffathers Honour and ours, and to the welfare of the Church of England. The Care in procureing whereof according to the True originall Copie wee haue Committed vnto our Chaplain J)" Cosin Deane of Peterborough. Our Will and Pleasure therefoi^ is that you our said Resident shall as our publique Ministre take Notice hereof and upon all fitting occasions and oppor- tunityes according to your iudgement and discretion shall divulge and Publish as well the Censures wee haue executed upon the said Bookes of Marsys as likewise our auowing and approuing of this Edition of Monsieur Testards Trans- PREFACE. XXV lation ; wherein you shall giue your assistance to further and Promote it in our name and Interests, and upon all occasions shew such Eespect and Kindnesse to the said Mons' Testarde and any other wliome he shall employ for the Publishing thereof as may agree with his and their Juste desires, or your carefull and Keasonable performance ; And for so doing this shall be your warrant. Giuen vnder our at Castle Elizabeth In our Island of Jersey. To our Trusty and Welbeloued S' Eichard Browne Kn* & Baronet Our Eesid*. Scandalous Passages false Traductions and Contradictions in Marsys Booke styled Les Memoires &c. ; In the Kings Portraiture He takes away the Crowne of Glory which was in the English and Latin Copie. In his Title Page. 1. The Change of the True Title of the Booke first printed in England and after in Holland in English and Latin. 2. His averring in his Title Page that the Booke Intituled Portrait du Eoy &c. is a Counterfeit and suppo- sititious Booke. 3. His Boldnesse in making many impertinent and diners malitious Aimotations upon his Ma*'^' Booke and therein adding Eenuoys vnto a Scandalous Booke formerly set forth vnder his the said Marsys name In his Preface He takes upon him to tell the world that the king made no title to his Chapters in the Originall Booke which is more then he could say truly, for by iiis owne Confession he had not the sight of any otlier Copie but what was set forth in English and Latin where those titles of Chapters were printed in the third Person which as a Translator he ought to haue followed. In the Advertisement. 1. In the fourth Page his falsehood in averring Que le Eoy en d'autres endroits ne se sert pas de ce Terme (Papistes) mais de celuy de Catholique Eomain, whereas the XXVI PREFACE. King througliout his whole Booke giues them no other Appellation bat that of Papists. 2. Ibidem. Another false Assertion in saying that the Church of England hath retayned the same order and the same gouernment with that Catholique Church which euery- where in his Bookes (as he confessed in his Conference with us) he understands to be the Eoman Church. 3. Ibidem. A third false Assertion that there is no Community or Resemblance either in doctrine or in Gouern- ment between the Protestants of England and those whome he Calls Calvinists. 4. Ibidem. A fourth fal[s]e Assertion that of a good Protestant they may as easily make a (Koman) Catholique as a Riseing Sunne of a faire Morning. 5. A Calumnie upon the blessed king where raising to himselfe an objection that some perhaps will say the King paroist Protestant he answereth that though he had not been a Protestant it concerned him to write as he hath done for reason of State to take away the Accusation of those that said he was a (Roman) Catholique in his heart whereby Marsys doth not onely attempt to make it doubtfull of what Religion the King was, but to Render him also a most notorious Hypocrite in his life and death. 6. Another, that where the king exhorts his Sonne to be firme in the Protestante Religion it may be belieued it was for feare onely he should be Come a Calviniste whereas it is euident that the king mentioneth no Calvinist in that whole Chapter but exhorts him from the Pompe of that super- stitious Tyrannic (and whome that meant Marsys knew well enough) and from the meanes of Fantasticke Anarchie whome all the world knowes to bee "whome all the world knowes " y^ new Anabaptisticall Sects. 7. Another Calumny Que le Roy ne Choque Jamais les Catholiques (Romains) que pour Reiller les Heretiques (Calvinistes). 8. Where he makes an apologie for the late horrid Rebellion in Irelande, with these words Quelle Religion n'a point ceste Maxime de Chercher la libert6 de Conscience as if it were lawfull to seeke the same (as they did) by Rebellion. 9. A sawcy Contradiction giuen to the king by a petulant Retortion of his Ma*'''^ owne words in saying that les PREFACE. XXVU Irelandois font bien voir a present que les Catholiques (Romains) ont des maximes qui authorisent moins la Rebellion, que celles des Heretiques. 10. He saytli that the Popish Irish sont les seuls sujets des Isles Britanniques qui soient a present fideles a leur Roy by which impudent assertion he excludes from all fidelity to the king not onely the Marquis of Ormond and all other Protestants with in his Army and Guarisons in Ireland, but likewise all and euery other his Ma*'^' Pro- testant Subjetts whomesoeuer in England and Scotland together with the Isles of Man and Jersey (which are as Britannique as Ireland) thereby numbring them all among the Rebells and Traitors to the King. 11. That the kings Booke is so full of Invectiues against the Calvinistes as if he had Composed his Booke to Con- found them onely whereas the King in all his Booke nameth them not. 12. Pretending to Recite the Kings words concerning Churchwindowes, Crosses and Inscriptions upon the Monu- ments of the Dead, he repeats them vntruly and inferres from them the kings defence of Popery and Superstition which is cleane ditferente from the expresse Termes and Sense of his Ma^'^^ Booke. 13. He reproues the Translator of Rouen for hauing an ill designe, because he sought not his Ma"*"* leaue to Translate the Booke nor Communicated his Traduction to the English at Rouen before he printed it, whereby he makes an argu- ment against himselfe of his owne ill designe, who by his owne Confession (to us) was guilty of both these faults, which he blames in Mons' Porr^e. 14. The Sentence that Marsys giues of Monsieur Porr^es booke is, Ceux qui ont ce liure diffamatoire sont obliges d'lnuiter Plusieurs Personnes d'honneur et de tendre Conscience qui I'ont mis au feu and when his Title Page, Advertisement, Annotations, and Translations are well perused this will appeare a good Paterne for a Censure upon his workes. 15. That which the King calls Inscriptions of the Dead (as Marsys himselfe reads it in his Translation of that Place) is in this Advertisement out of opposition to Porree trans- lated Epitaphs des Catholiques (liomains). XXVlll PREFACE. 16. Vndertaking to prone that the Booke called Portrait du Eoy is Counterfeit he acknowledgeth that both it and that of his owne are taken from one and the same Originall, and yet that one of them (meaning Porr^es) is not the Kings. 17. He pretends to hane seen the kings manuscript and from thence inferres that the additionall Peices concerning the Discourse of the King to his Childeren, the Duke of Glocester and the Princesse Elizabeth are malitiously annexed to the Second Edition of Porr^es Translation, who therein followed the Copie Imprinted in England giuen vnder that Princesse owne hand, which this Marsys Sawcily Sensureth to be partiall and absurd, as well for the Kings Recommendation of the Bookes there named to her, as for her Incapacity to vnderstand the smallest Rudiments of Christianity. 1 8. He is too bold to owne and Publish to the world his knowledge or sight of another Booke Composed by the King wliich himselfe Confesseth for Certaine Reasons is not yet to be set forth, but insinuateth that hereafter he shall be the man who shall set it forth. In a short view that we tooke of his Translation wherein he boasteth to haue been so religeously exact that he hath not altered nor taken away one Iota we find as followeth. Chap. 1. he translateth the words other Gentlemen la plus Part des Membres ; Ibidem. Whereas the King saith — the Health of all States and kingdomes Marsys saith States onely and leaues out kingdomes. Chap. 7, parag. 8. Impudence is translated DTmprudence. Ibidem. The Kings words — Wee doe not much blame the vnkindnesse of the generality & vulgar, Marsys translateth Puisque nous Cognoissons que le general en est Innocent. Ibidem, to the Kings words — of eating our bread lieadds — Comme on dit. Chap. 8. Parag. 10 being Compared with the Kings booke, Marsys Translation appeareth to be very defectiue. Chap. 12. AYhereas the King saith— By hov\^ much protestant Principles are more against all Rebellion against Princes then those of Papists. Marsys rendereth these PREFACE. , XXIX words — Que les Principes des Protestants asseurent plus les Monarques contre la Rebellion que Ceux des Papistes. Wherein he Comraitteth the same fault that in his adver- tisement he blameth in Porree for not observing the literall Translation of this particular Place. Chap. 15. The King vseth foure tymes the wordes papists, and Marsys thrice translateth it Catholique Romain; of which distinction framed onely by himselfe he maketh a vaine and false vse, in his advertisement against Porree, and to make good this his feigned difference doth in one and the same paragraph of this Chapter render the word Papists by the Terme of Romane Catholique in the first part thereof and Papist in the latter. Chap. 23. Where the King restraines his words to those Scotts, that deliuered him up, Marsys enlargeth his trans- lation to Escossois in generall. And where the King saith, If I am sold which is conditional! Marsys turnes it abso- lutely, le Regret que i'ay d'estre vendu. In his Annotations and Renvois. Page 2. Where the kinge speaketh of his interest in Religion, Marsys saith it is because he tooke upon him the Title of Head in Spirituall Matters against which (though the King neuer tooke that title) he inveigheth in his Booke, whereunto he referreth. Pag. 35. Where the king Speaketh of his prayers and Teares, Marsys addeth his Note, that they were vnprofitable, if they came not from the heart. Pag. 38. Where the King referreth to himselfe in naming the Restored Glory of the Suns height after his Ecclypse Marsys noteth it in his Margent for a Clinch saying SVN Qui signifie Soleil en Anglois signifie aussi fils ; le Roy par cette Equivoque touche elegament le Restablissement du Roy d'a present son fils. Page 39. He makes his boldnesse and sayth It seemeth the King foresaw that God could not saue him without a Miracle. Page 47. At the Kings word Papist Marsys noteth, that the King doth not say Catholiques, and yet in his Adver- tisement he plainely saith that he did vse this word here, and Referres to this very place. XXX PREFACE. Page 48. The Kings Words against the Irish Eebells — Ce peuple estant desia assez dispose a des violences exor- bitantes, tant per quelques maximes de leur Religion &c. Marsys to excuse them noteth La Reyne Elizabeth a fort persecute les Irelandois. And upon the words Maximes — De repouster la force, Qui vous Constraint dans vostre Religion, cette Maxime est commune a toute Sorte de Religions. A bold and a false note (especially upon the Kings words) and againe les Irelandois se resouuenent des cruautes que les Protestants auoient exerces sur eux se vangerent par cette occasion, qu'ils entrouerent. As if this w^ere a just excuse for their rebellion. Page 78. Ypon the Kings words, I'orgueil de quelque gens, Marsys makes this note Luther and Calvin & les Autres Princes et estats qui ont embrasse leur nouuelle doctrine, As if the Kings expression had Reference to them. Page 122. Where the King expresseth himselfe cleerely as in many other places in his Booke for his Sonnes Constancy in the Protestant Religion of the Church of England Marsys noteth in his margin, II entend la Religion Chrestienne en general. In Monsieur Marsys his Histoire de la Persecution presente &c. There will be found in those seuerall Places wee haue scored with red Inke many false and slanderous Passages. 1. Against the Realme of England. 2. Against the honour of the Queen of Great Bretagne in his Epistle dedicatory vnto her for which she flung it away nere the tyme of the First Edition. 3. Against King Henry the 8th. 4. Against Queen Elizabeth. 5. Against King James. 6. Against King Charles. 7. Against the lawes of England. 8. Against the Judges of England. 9. Against the Church of England. In his Processe Concerning the Kings Death. 1. Marsys vndertaking (in his litle [Title] Page) to trans- late the English Copie faithfully which he performeth not. 2. Au Lecteur. He pretends that the Kings Ennemies PREFACE. XXXI sett forth that Relation in English, and that y^ Translation of Rouen followed a false Copie yet Marsys himselfe had no other. 3. He giues notice to the world of his Booke (called the Persecution of England) that it might be enquired after and sell the better. 4. Page the 8. He calls Queen Eliz:[abeth] an Impious Jezabell (which he found not in his Copie). 5. Pag. 9. He adds 24 lines of his owne head to abuse the kingdome and King Henry the 8. 6. Page 11 & 12. He alters all the Kings Speech omitts a great part of it, and makes his last words to be spoken in a disordered Passion Tenez Traistres. 7. Page 13 & 14. Of the hue Paragraphs that follow, those are added of his owne head, who promised in his Title to be a faithfull Translatour. A period of ten years now elapses in the Nicholas papers before any further allusion to the Eikon is to be found, but only ten days before Charles II. returns to take possession of his kingdom, he writes a brief note to Monsieur Porr^e, who figures so often in the letter with its enclosures just given. In the note the King thanks Porree for apparently a new French translation of the Uikon, which he still calls his Father's book. The letter is the original draft revised and corrected, and consequently does not bear the King's stamp or signature. Breda, May 20, 1660. Monsieur Porree, Jay tousjours souhaitte de voir le liure du feu roy Mon Pere en beau francois et vous auez touchy mes souhaits cela et le soin que vous auez de desabuser le monde en ce qui est de la fermete de ma creance mar- que" nt " asses laffection que vous faites profession d'auoir pour moy et dont "jay tire" vous mauez donn6 beaucoup de preuues ; aussy vous puisje asseurer que j'en ay tout le ressentiment qu'il faut et comme je pretends de dementir par ma Constance dans la religion " protestante " Reformee tons les faux bruits que mes ennemis ont malicieusement XXXll PREFACE, fait coiirir a mon "deso" preiudice *^par ma coustance dans la Relligion Protestante " : vous deues croire que je noublieray pas les bons offices que vous me rendes en repoussant ces calomnies qui mattaquent par ou je suis le plus " le plus " sensible, et que je seray tousjours. Endorsed "A Monsieur Porree." At the close of the same year 1660, on 29th November, Charles II. granted to Koyston, the publisher (who had printed the first edition of the Eikon), the monopoly of printing his Father's works, and in the patent calls that book "the most excellent discourses and soliloquies of our blessed Father." Among the Nicholas papers is a printed broadside containing the original advertisement of this complete edition, which unhappily perished a few years later in the celebrated Fire of London. It runs thus — ;'M.S. Sanctissimi Regis, & Martyris, Caroli. Siste Viator. Luge, Obmutesce, Mirare ! Memento Caroli Illius Nominis pariter, & Pietatis Insignissimse, Primi Magnae Britannise Eegis : Qui Rebellium Perfidia primo Deceptus Dein Perfidorum Rabie Percussus Inconcussus tamen Legum & Fidei Defensor, Schismaticorum Tyrannidi Succubuit. Anno Salutis Humane^, MDCXLYIIL Servitutis Nostrse, ) p • Fselicitatis Suae, J ' Corona Terrestri Spoliatus, Cselesti Donatus. Sileant Autem Periturae Tabellae. Perlege Reliquias, sere Sacras, Carolinas, In Quels &ui Mnemosynem, cere perenniorem vivacius exprimit Ilia, Ilia. EIKflN BA^IAIKH, PREFACE. XXXlll "This is placed with his Majesties Pourtraicture in St. Olaves Silver Street Church, in London, with his Works in Folio under it/' Sir Edward Nicholas has left behind him a great many memoranda on various subjects, some political, some theo- logical, &c. ; written on backs of envelopes addressed to himself, or on any little scraps of paper he h?.ppened to have by him. These are in many cases exceedingly interesting and important, especially some autobiographical notes of his chequered career. But on the back of an envelope addressed to him while in exile, and on some blank sheets of letterpaper, are about a dozen pages of moral and religious maxims and apophthegms, borrowed chiefly from the Bible. Interspersed among them are three sentences selected from " the King's Book." They do not appear to have been copied from any printed edition of that work, as the reference is to folios, not pages. First he quotes from Chapter VIII. of the EiJcon, " The excesse of impotent passions iniures a man more than his greatest enemies can. K[ing]es booke. 56." Secondly, from Chapter XL, " Tumults are the hounds that attend the cry and hollow of those men, who hunt after faccions and priuat designs to the ruyne of Church and State. K[ing]es booke. fol. 97." (This quotation from fol not j;«^e 97, brings to remembrance that Nicholas Oudart, Secretary to Sir Edward Nicholas, is said to have transcribed the King's original manuscript for the press, and it is not at all unlikely that Sir E. Nicholas had this MS. copy by him while making these extracts from the Eihon.) Thirdly, from Chapter XII., " The goodness of mens intentions will not excuse the scandall and contagion of ill examples. K[ing]es booke. 105." Here in this quotation is a slight variation from the printed copies, which read ^Hhe'ir examples," instead of "' i// examples;" another proof that c XXXIV' PREFACE. Sir E. Mcholas was citing a manuscript, not a printed copy. These moral and religious memoranda were most likely written during his leisure moments, after his retirement from the Secretaryship of State, and therefore some years subsequent to the date of his letter to Gauden found among the North papers, which has been suj^posed by the Bishop's supporters to show Nicholas' knowledge of the true author of the Eikon. On none, however, of these papers of Sir E. Nicholas is there the slightest note or endorsement by him to show that he knew the opinions and sentiments ex- pressed in them respecting the Eikon and Charles I. to be either mistaken or false, or that he had ever heard of or been made acquainted with Gauden's claim. The only remaining document as yet unnoticed among the Nicholas papers is an English letter from John Earles, Chaplain to Charles II., in which he dedicates to him his Latin translation of the Eikon. It is undated, but must have been written about the summer of 1649. The Latin copy of this letter is printed before all the Latin editions of the Eikon, but the English one is slightly fuller, and being the original of the Latin, and apparently unpublished, may be useful in support of the King's cause. To THE Kings most sacred Majesty. May it please your Ma*'^ To receive into your gratious protection this image and pourtraict of your glorious Eather (wherein he is nearer the similitude of God then as he is either a man or king) which thougli it appeare in a forraigne dresse and colour, yet it is such, as will make it more visible, and by con- sequence more publicke ; for so I understood your Majesties pleasure was, that it should be deliuered to the Avorld in a language common to the most part of the world : wherein I heartily wish I could haue done your Maj'^ that satisfactory service, as to haue rendered it in that naturall elegancy, PREFACE. XXXV and cleere and liuely expressions, wherewith the admirall originall aboundeth ; which as it may puzzle perhaps the best master of language, soe it is much too hard for me; And yet as it is, I conceiue it much better, that it should even thus discoloured, and with some blemish of its lustre and excellency, converse with the greatest part of Europe, then to be confined to a few of his owne nation, and be silent to all the world besides ; since there are here (if I may speake it with reuerence) some of those great things of God, which it concernes mankind to be made publique in all languages. I have endeavoured according to my small ability to render it, if not in the same beauty, yet with the greatest truth and perspicuity, being not willing to depart from the very phrase and stile, so farr as the different Idiome of y^ Latin would permitt me ; since of so sacred a booke, as this is, we ought to be religious interpreters. And truly next that most sacred booke (w'='' admitts of no comparisons) I hope it will be no boldnes to say, that never any meerely humane worke has deserued so much esteeme, either for y*" author or the argument. Certainly the piety of Eoyall Persons deriues something from the height of their condition and has somewhat more noble and divine and w*^^ challenges a greater power over the soules of men, and is received with more reverence then those of inferior ranke and quallity, for which cause God himselfe has been pleased in those parts of Scripture, w''^ more particularly belong to his worship, and are of perpetuall vse in the Church (such as Psalmes and Himmes and Prayers are) to make Princes his Instruments in the composing and conveying them to the world, to adde the more authority & Majesty vnto them. Men generally take vp devotion with a much better appetite when it is thus offered and presented ; As we see by experience in this very Booke, w*=^ all that vnderstood it were very much affected with, and wil be euery day much more, when being put into more languages it shalbe more vnderstood. A rare and admirable thing it was thus to meditate, thus to compose, but a thing of much more admiration to line, and to dye so : that these great expressions of piety, w'''' may seeme too bigg for any mans thought, were outdone bv c 2 XXXVl PREFACE. this great example. This that vnhappy part of the world, the most sinfull at this day, and the most polluted, is too sad a wittnes of. Oh how well had it been for them if they had sooner vnderstood that excellent vertue which now too-too late they admire & deplore, since it hath past the try all of that terrible fornace, the greatest calamity to vs, but to him the greatest blessednesse imaginable, even that last and saddest part of his life, and that fatall day (wherein he was made a spectacle to men and angells, and gave such excellent proofs of a strong faith, & most invincible courage and constancy standing above all his sufferings and all the malice of Hell heaped together) was beyound all the glories and tryumphs of earthly Princes. You have done nothing, you of all mankind the ! (but I will not speake any horrible word in the entrance of so holy a Booke, nor make them the object of my curse, that are so much a part of his prayers) you have done nothing I say in this murder, but only joyned his Glory and Immortality with your owne eternal! shame and rej^roach ! Never any King since the Creation was lamented with so many true teares, extolled with so hearty and vnfayned applauses. Never did any in his most flourishing condition, extort from the feare, or buy from the flattery of their subjects those false & lying commendations, as were freely paid to his afflictions, to his overthrowes, to his Prison, to his Scaffold, and that direfull & dismall Axe, wherewith he astonished his Enemys dying, and tryvmphed over his murderers. In the meanetime I doubt not but your sacred Ma^''^ (who are the true & liuely Portraict of your Royall Father, whose greatest happinesse in his prosperity, & greatest comfort in adversity was, that he had such a sonne in whom he cannot dye) will take flame from this example, not to revenge his death only (to which it may become others to incite you rather than myselfe), but to imitate that Heroicall virtue and constancy, and to take possession of that (whereof no force can deprive you against your will) the Inheritance of Religion and Piety. And as you are of tender afl'ections to all those that have neer Relations to you, so I hope you will be pleased to extend them in some measure to this Booke, a Child of the same Father. PREFACE. XXXVU " Prov : 7-4. Say vnto wisedome thou art my sister, a,nd to vnderstandiiig thou art my kinswoman." Advise with it. Converse with it, and transfuse it into thy very soule and spiritt. You see the eyes of all men are cast vpon you, all the hopes of good men fixed in you, all their lines depending on you, which noe doubt many men had long since out of y^ extremity of their calamitys abandoned, but that they reserved them meerely to imploy in your service. A great businesse attends you great expectation great difficultys and such as require a greater taske and proportion of virtue then was before in any of your Predecessors. Whether there shall be a Kingdome a.ny more in Britanny, whether Eeligion, whether Men, whether God againe, depends meerely vpon your virtue, your fortune or rather your fortune vpon G-ods mercy, of the necessity of whose present assistance as your Ma*'^ must needs be now much more sensible, so I doubt not but that you will labour to procure it by all the dutys of Piety and Religion, and that ail these happy seedes (so abundantly shed in your Royall breast) of Justice, Tem- perance, Prudence, and Goodnesse, may be nourished heightened and ripened to perfection, that God at length appeased and wholly reconciled may be graciously pleased to add that to your Ma"^ w'^^ he tooke from your Father, & to recompence his sorrowes in redoubled blessings, that you may be called That Restorer, w^^ is the hope and desire of all, and the most earnest & fervent prayer of Your Maj*y« most humble and devoted Subject & Chaplaine, John Earles. It is a curious fact that the writer of this letter succeeded Gauden in the bishopric of Worcester, and yet so far as is known he never uttered any opinions or left any writings to show that he altered in the slightest degree his belief so strongly expressed in his dedication of his Latin edition that Ch-arles I. had composed the Elkoii. To sum up, therefore^ tli^e new external evidence during the last fifty XXXVlll PREFACE. years in behalf of the Eoyal Author, we have — 1st, The holograph memorandum of Archbishop Tenison in his copy of Earles' Latin translation now in the Lambeth Library, which completely establishes, on the evidence of a most credible eye-witness, the existence of a Naseby copy, a fact alone sufficient to extinguish utterly Gauden's story of his forgery. 2nd, The letter with its two enclosures from Sir C. Hatton, Sir R. Browne, Dean Cosin, and Morley, which alludes more than once to the King's original manuscript as if still in existence, and about to be entrusted to Dean Cosin's keeping. 3rd, The letter from Charles IL to Porree ten years later, on the eve of his Restoration, in which he again terms the Eikon the book of the late King, his Father. 4th, The original broadside advertisement of the new edition of the work in December, 1660, published under Royal patronage by Royston (a month subsequent to Gauden's first appeal to Charles II.), wherein it is described at length as the work of Charles I. 5th, The three selections by Sir E. Nicholas after 1663 from the King's Book, where he evidently quotes not a printed book, but a Manuscript Copy. 6th, The English original of John Earles' Latin dedicatory letter of his translation. In conclusion, to show how base a timeserver Bishop Gauden was, and how utterly unfit he was to concoct such a forgery, it will be necessary to reproduce an unpublished letter written by his own hand in the name of himself and his wife to Henry Cromwell, Lord Deputy of Ireland, the younger son of Oliver Cromwell, at that time Lord Pro- tsctor. It occurs in the correspondence of Henry Cromwell, now preserved among the Lansdowne MSS. in the British Museum, No. 822, f. 1. "My Lord the renowne of your Lordships gouerment with such piety justice and clemency as giues life and recouery to that state of Ireland which was lately Ian- PREFACE. XXXIX guishing & dying This (just Honor) bath made many your Lordships admirers who (yet) are humbly obseruant of that distance wherein they stand to your Lordships eminent place and authority noe lesse than your virtues; In this number I may owne my selfe and my wife whose great content it is to heare of that happines which your Lordship and your Lady enjoy ; and to find by that Gentleman who lately came from your Lordship that wee alsoe are soe happy as to reteine some place in your memorys and fauours of which he gaue vs soe particular assurance that wee haue taken this Confidence to expresse our thankfull sense of that honor your Lordship and your Lady are pleased to doe vs when you voutsafe to think a kind thought of vs as persons condemned to obscurity ; never to bee releiued except by such a barren way of industry as is sometimes giuen mee by such sad occasions as that of my nephew Will Eussells and Mr. Rob. Eichs death. To the vrne of this last I haue beene invited by your Lordships Sister the Lady Frances to Consecrate a litle monument ; which possibly may (as marble) bee durable though it bee fruitlesse; vnlesse it bee productive of your Lordships fauour and acceptance, beyond that degree which it expects in England ; The fate of books is like that of many trees to bring forth nothing but leaues. Being not read by many and valewed by few especially yf they strike vpon just securitys becoming all good Christians and wise to lay to heart ; Noe discouragements in England haue hindred mee from presenting my sense of otheres deathes & my owne mortality to your Lordships view. The rather because I haue heard that your Lordship hath beene a noble asserter of our Richs honor even in Ireland ; The vindication of which I willingly vndertook against a great streame of vulgar credulity ; Being satisfied in this that I did the part of justice & gratitude to the dead ; My ambition must bee to performe such actions as are their owne reward ; among which I hope this is one; a copy of which I adventure vpon your Lordships and your Ladys acceptance; who in your highest secular advancements carry soe moderate a temper of minde & actions as willingly reflects vpon the end of all these momentary dreams ; It is some recompense to my paines that I haue hereby an opportunity to expresse to xl PllEFACE. your Lordship & your excellent Lady how much wee are ambitious to live worthy of that fauour your Noblenesses were pleased to expresse to Your Lordships very Humble Servants, John Elizabeth Gauden. London, May 24, 1658." The address on the back of the letter is — " These to the right Honourable the Lord Deputy of Ireland, present." In another hand, probably that of Henry Cromwell, is the endorsement — "24 May 58. Mr. Jo. Gauden." If this fulsome letter from Gauden and his wife to one of the chiefest men in that Commonwealth which had taken the place and usurped the functions of the supposed Royal author of the Eikon be compared with the Bishop's letters written within three years from this date to the Lord Chancellor Hyde and the Earl of Bristol, the comparison will prove at once profitable and suggestive. In his earlier letter he thus speaks of books : '*' The fate of books is like that of many trees, to bring forth nothing but leaves. Being not read by many and valued by few, especially if they strike upon just securities becoming all good Christians and wise to lay to heart." But in his later letter to Hyde, on 21st Jan., 1660-1 : ''When it (his book, the ElJcon) came out, just upon the King's death. Good God ! what shame, rage and despite filled his Murtherers ! AVhat Comfort his PREFACE. xli friends ! How many enemies did it Convert ! How many- hearts did it mollify and melt ! What devotions it raysed to hys posterity, as children of such a father I What preparations it made in all mens minds for this happy restauration, and which I hope shall not prove my affliction ! In a word, it w^as an army, and did vanquish more than any sword could." Again, in his letter to H. Cromwell (the son of the chief of those men whom he calls in the j^assage just quoted the King's Murtherers), he writes : "We. have taken this Confidence to express our thankful sense of that honour your Lordship and your Lady are pleased to doe us when you vouchsafe to think a kind thought of us, as persons condemned to obscurity." But in his letter to Lord Bristol, of the 20th March, 1661-2, he uses the same expression to the most influential person in the Court of the murdered King's son : " How much I have of gratitude and honour for you whose eminent lustre hath condescended to owne hym whom some men [i.e., Clarendon and Morley] have banished to soe great an obscurity." One more quotation is sufficient. In his letter to H. Cromwell he says : " My ambition must bee to performe such actions as are their owne reward." In his letter to Lord Bristol, of 27th March, 1662, he tells us his actions during the Commonwealth were by no means of that nature, but that he was '' Sufficiently knowne to all the English world by those many great and i^ublique works I had done in my spheare to the hazard of my estate, liberty and life, in order to preserve and restore the just interests of the Church and Crown in the worst of times and things. Both enemies and friends saw me always standing in the gap with a bold and diligent loyalty, doing my duty by preaching, printing, and acting to the great vexation and confusion of those tyrants and usurpers." Among the chief of these tyrants and usurpers was Henry Cromwell, Lord Deputy of Ireland, his patron and xlii PREFACE. friend only three years before. And yet this Gauden is the man whom, on his own unsupported testimony (for his wife and his curate, Dr. Walker, only derive their evidence and story second-hand from him), so many credulous persons, too indolent to inquire or examine for themselves, believe to have been the sole composer and author of the Eikon Basilike, a work which bears on every page the peculiar stamp of Charles's mind and habit of thought, and which betrays over and over again an intimate acquaintance with passing events to the minutest details, which could only have been known to the King. It were a fitting tribute to the memory of Bishop Gauden that the letter from himself and his wife should be written in letters of brass, and placed along with his effigy in Worcester Cathedral, to accompany the Eikon Basilike which he there holds in his hands, or at least that sentence of the letter which almost sounds prophetic of his own tomb : " A little monument, which possibly may, as marble, be durable, though it be fruitless." Edward Scott. 30 Jan., ISSO. Mr. Edward Scott has much pleasure in announcing that^ while the prese7it sheets we7^e passing through the press^ Mr. John B. Marsh has made the most valuable and inte- resting discovery in corroboration of the Royal Authorship that has yet fallen to the lot of any inquirer into the subject' He has found in the Record Office the original of the Second Prayer at the end of the Eikon (page 224J, in the hand- writing of Charles /., of the date 1 63 1 , and it co7itains a few trifling differences fi^om the printed copy. — March 22, 1880. An article upon this discovery^ settino forth in parallel colunms the Prayer in the handwriting of the king and the version as it appeared in the first edition of the Eikon, i^ill appear in The ANTiQUARYy^r May, 252SE5H5HS FdKiop BacnXiicrj. B^ THE POURTRAICTURE OF HIS SACRED M A J E S T I E IN HIS SOLITUDES AND SUFFERINGS. Rom. 8. More then Conquerotir, &c. Bona agere, & mala paii, Regiurn ejt. ^a Reprinted In R. M. An, Dom. 1648. CONTENTS. PAGE I. Upon His Majesty's Calling this last Parliament . . 1 II. Upon the Earl of Strafford's Death .... 5 III. Upon His Majesty's going to the House of Commons . 10 IV. Upon the Insolency of the Tunuilts 14 V. Upon His Majesty's Passing the Bill for the Triennial Parliaments, and, after settling this, during the Pleasure of the Two Houses 21 VI. Upon His Majesty's Retirement from Westminster . . 27 VII. Upon the Queen's Departure and Absence out of England 34 A'lII. Upon His Majesty's Repulse at Hull, and the Fates of the Hothams 38 IX. Upon the Lifting and Raising Armies against the King 44 X. Upon their Seizing the King's Magazines, Forts, Navy, and Militia 54 Xll. CONTENTS. PAGE XI. Upon the Nineteen Propositions first sent to the King, and more afterwards 61 XIL Upon the Rebellion and Troubles in Ireland . . 73 XIII. Upon the Calling in of the Scots, and their Coming 82 XIV. Upon the Covenant 90 XY. Upon the many Jealousies raised, and Scandals cast upon the King, to stir up the people against him . . 100 XYI. Upon the Ordinance against the Common Prayer-book 113 XVII. Of the Differences between the King and the Two Houses, in Point of Church Government . . .121 XVIII. Upon Uxbridge Treaty, aud other Offers made to the King 137 XIX. Upon the various Events of the War; Victories and Defeats 142 XX. Upon the Reformation of the Times . . . .149 XXI. Upon His Majesty's Letters taken and divulged . .156 XXII. Upon His Majesty's leaving Oxford, and going to the Scots 162 XXIII. Upon the Scots delivering the King to the English, and his Captivity at Holdenby 165 XXIV. Upon their denying His Majesty the attendance of his Chaplains .169 CONTENTS. Xlll. PAGE XXV. Penitential Meditations and Vows in the King's Solitude at Holdenby 180 XXVI. Upon the Army's Surprisal of the King at Holdenby, and the ensuing Distractions in the Two Houses, the Army, and the City 184 XXVn. To the Prince of Wales 191 XXVIII. Meditations upon Death, after the Votes of Non- Addresses, and His Majesty's closer Imprisonment in Carisbrook Castle 207 Private Prayers used by His Majesty in the time of his Sufferings . . ...... 223 TheExpkmtioti oftheEMBLEME Though chqi>,'i maUiprobrijs aravatu.'\ , P«lm4 u/Beprcfs J , n-jur^o- I 'Ixgi Krencta hrenj A^.vcfut umfarum Fluflus Vcnt/tjj./irmm , ^rnti {PoJ,ufi l^upci immota rcj,d,^ . \ . Clarior e tencbrii, cixGsiU slcUa, cai-uj.'j. 'viihr ct cciernum-fcHci face triumpfio . nuro Fulgentetn rutiU jcmmi^j mi^:int^m , at curl's Gravidam sicrnenJi caXco Coronam. pinofam, at fcrri {a.ci\em .jtu Spes inca,( hi/U UtXiliP- ,'J^^ non ail tra elate mulciium. . i^iernim, JaruJiiUi, scm^eroi-hesLta.m \ fnQctffi ceufi/ iSpecto, tJ^^'f? BaraUik,. i/Vanum dihcrw; quodCnnshQaX\a.prasfct th weights ofmjjcf Pdltii-Mc Dcpre(i'd. I higher rise . Anic ;cl Rock, out-hr The loi/t'raus Wmclc.?M7?w?6'w^. Set hounds to our passions hy reason, to our errors hy truth, to our seditions hy laws duly executed, and to our schisms hy charity, that we may he, as Thy Jerusalem, a city at unity in itself. This grant, O my God, in Thy good time, for Jesus Christ's sake. Amen. Upon His Majesty's Passing the Bill for the Triennial Parliaments, and, after settling this, DURING the Pleasure of the Two Houses. That the world might be fully confirmed in my purposes at first to contribute what in justice, reason, honour, and conscience I could to the happy success of this Parliament, which had in me no other design but the general good of my kingdoms, I willingly passed the Bill for Triennial Parliaments ; which, as gentle and seasonable physic might, if well appHed, prevent any distempers from getting any head or prevailing, especially if the remedy proved not a disease beyond all remedy. 22 Upon His Majesty's Passing the Bill I conceived this Parliament would find work, with convenient recesses, for the first three years, but I did not imagine that some men would thereby have occa- sioned more work than they found to do by undoing so much as they found well done to their hands. Such is some men's activity, that they will needs make work rather than want it, and choose to be doing amiss rather than do nothing. When that first Act seemed too scanty to satisfy some men's fears, and compass public affairs, I was persuaded to grant that Bill of sitting during the pleasure of the Houses, which amounted in some men's sense to as much as the perpetuating this Parliament. By this act of highest confidence I hoped for ever to shut out and lock the door upon all present jealousies and future mis- takes ; I confess I did not thereby intend to shut myself out of doors, as some men have now requited me. True, it was an Act unparalleled by any of my pre- decessors, yet cannot in reason admit of any worse in- terpretation than this, of an extreme confidence I had that my subjects would not make ill use of an Act, by which I declared so much to trust them, as to deny myself in so high a point of my prerogative. For good subjects will never think it just or fit that my condition should be worse by my bettering theirs ; nor, indeed, would it have been so in the events if some men had known as well with moderation to use, as with earnestness to desire, advantages of doing good or evil. A continual Parliament, I thought, would but keep for the Triennial Parliaments. 23 the common weal in tune, by preserving laws in their due execution and vigour, wherein my interest lies more than any man's, since by those laws my rights as a king would be preserved no less than my subjects, which is all I desired. More than the law gives me I would not have, and less the meanest subject should not. Some, as I have heard, gave it out that I soon re- pented me of that settling Act, and many would needs persuade me I had cause so to do ; but I could not easily nor suddenly suspect such ingratitude in men of honour, that the more I granted them the less I should have and enjoy wdth them. I still counted myself un- diminished by my largest concessions, if by them I might gain and confirm the love of my people. Of which I do not yet despair but that God will still bless me with increase of it, when men shall have more leisure and less prejudice, that so with unpassionate re- presentations they may reflect upon those, as I think, not more princely than friendly contributions which I granted towards the perpetuating of their happiness, who are now only miserable in this, that some men's ambition will not give them leave to enjoy what I intended for their good. Nor do I doubt but that in God's due time the loyal and cleared affections of my people will strive to return such retributions of love and honour to me or my posterity, as may fully compensate both the acts of my confidence and my sufterings for them, which, God knows, have been neither few, nor small, nor short ; occasioned chiefly by a persuasion I had that I could 24 Vpon His Majesty's Passitu/ the Bill not grant too much, or distrust too little, to men that, being professedly my subjects, pretended singular piety and religious strictness. The injury of all injuries is that which some men will needs load me withal, as if I were a wilful and resolved occasioner of my own and my subjects' mi- series; while, as they confidently, but, God knows, falsely divulge, I repining at the establishment of this Parliament, endeavoured by force and open hostihty to undo what by my royal assent I had done. Sure it had argued a very short sight of things, and an extreme fatuity of mind in me, so far to bind my own hands at their request, if I had shortly meant to have used a sword against them. God knows, though I had then a sense of injuries, jet not such as to think them worth vindicating by a war. I was not then compelled, as since, to injure myself by their not using favours with the same candour wherewith they were conferred. The tumults, indeed, threatened to abuse all acts of grace and turn them into wantonness ; but I thought at length their own fears, whose black arts first raised up those turbulent spirits, would force them to conjure them down again. Nor, if I had justly resented any indignities put upon me or others, was I then in any capacity to have taken just revenge in an hostile and warlike way upon those whom I knew so well fortified in the love of the meaner sort of the people, that I could not have given my enemies greater and more desired advantages against me than by so unprincely inconstancy to have assaulted- for the Triennial ParUainents. 25 them with arms, thereby to scatter them, whom but lately I had solemnly settled by an Act of Parliament. God knows I longed for nothing more than that my- self and my subjects might quietly enjoy the fruits of my many condescendings. It had been a course full of sin, as well as of hazard and dishonour, for me to go about the cutting up of that by the sword, which I had so lately planted so much, as I thought, to my subjects' content and mine own too, in all probability ; if some men had not feared w^here no fear was, whose security consisted in scaring others. I thank God I knew so well the sincerity and uprightness of my own heart in passing that great Bill, which exceeded the very thoughts of former times, that although I may seem a less politician to men, yet I need no secret distinctions or evasions before God. Nor had I any reservations in my own soul when I passed it, nor repentings after, till I saw that my letting some men go up to the pinnacle of the temple was a temptation to them to cast me down headlong ; con- cluding that, without a miracle, monarchy itself, together with me, could not but be dashed in pieces by such a precipitous fall as they intended ; whom God in mercy forgive, and make them see at length that as many kingdoms as the devil shewed our Saviour, and the glory of them, if they could be at once enjoyed by them, are not worth the gaining by ways of sinful in- gratitude and dishonour, which hazards a soul worth more worlds than this hath kingdoms. 26 Upon His MajesUfs Passing the Bill, dx. But God hath hitherto preserved me, and made me to see that it is no strange thing for men left to their own passions either to do much evil themselves, or abuse the overmuch goodness of others, whereof an ungrateful surfeit is the most desperate and incurable disease. I cannot say properly that I repent of that act, since I have no reflections upon it as a sin of my will, though an error of too charitable a judgment ; only I am sorry other men's eyes should be evil because mine were good. To Thee, my God, do I dill appeal, whose all-dis- cerning justice sees through all thie disguises of menh pretensions, and deceitful clarhiesses of their hearts. Thou gaxest me a heart to grant much to my suljects, and now I need a heart fitted to suffer much from some of them. Thy will he done, though never so much to the crossing of ours, even when we hope to do what might he most conformalle to Thine and theirs too, who pretended they aimed at nothing else. Let Thy grace teach me wisely to enjoy as well the frustratings as the fulfillings of my best ho]3Cs and most specious desires. I see ichilc T thought to allay others' fears, I have raised mine own ; and hy settling them, have unsettled myself. Thus have they requited me evil for good, and hatred for my good-will towards them. Upon His Majesty's Retirement from Westminster. 27 Lord, he Thou my pilot in this darh arid dangerous storm, ivhich. neither admits my return to the port whence I set out, nor my mahiny any other with that safety and honour which I desiyned. It is easy for Thee to keep me safe in the lore and con- fidence of my people, nor is it hard for Thee to preserve me amidst the unjust hatred and jealousies of too many, ivhich Thou hast suffered so far to prevail upon me, as to he ahle to pervert and ahuse my acts of greatest indulgence to them, and assurance of them. But no favours from me can maize others more guilty than myself may he, of misusing those many and great ones ivhich Thou, Lord, hast conferred on me. 1 heseech Thee give me and them such repentance as Thou wilt accept, and such grace as we may not ahuse. Male me so far happy as to mahe a right use of others' ahuses, a^id hy their failings of me, to reflect with a reform- ing displeasure upon my offences ayainst Thee. So, although for my sitis I am hy other men^s sins de- prived of Thy temporal hlessings, yet I may he happy to enjoy the confort of Thy mercies, which often raise the greatest sufferers to he the most glorious saints. VI. Upon His Majesty's Retirement from Westminster. With what unwillingness I withdrew from West- minster, let them judge who, unprovided of tackling 28 Upon His Majesty's and victual, are forced to sea by a storm, yet better do so than venture splitting or sinking on a lee-shore. I stayed at Whitehall till I was driven away by shame more than fear, to see the barbarous rudeness of those tumults who resolved they would take the boldness to demand anything, and not leave either myself or the members of Parliament the liberty of our reason and conscience to deny them anything. Nor was this intolerable oppression my case alone, though chiefly mine ; for the Lords and Commons might be content to be over- voted by the major part of their Houses, w^hen they had used each their own freedom. Whose agreeing votes were not by any law or reason conclusive to my judgment, nor can they include or carry with them my consent, whom they represent not in any kind ; nor am I further bound to agree with the votes of both Houses than I see them agree with the will of God, with my just rights as a King, and the general good of my people. I see that, as many men, they are seldom of one mind ; and I may oft see that the major part of them are not in the right. I had formerly declared to sober and moderate minds how desirous I was to give all just content when I agreed to so many Bills ; which had been enough to secure and satisfy all, if some men's hydropic insatiable- ness had not learned to thirst the more by how much the more they drank, whom no fountain of royal bounty was able to overcome, so resolved they seemed either utterly to exhaust it, or barbarously to obstruct it. Retirement from Westminster. 29 Sure it ceases to be counsel when not reason is used, as to men, to persuade, but force and terror, as to beasts, to drive and compel men to assent to whatever tumult- uary patrons shall project. He deserves to be a slave, without pity or redemption, that is content to have the rational sovereignty of his soul and liberty of his will and words so captivated. Nor do I think my kingdoms so considerable as to preserve them with the forfeiture of that freedom which cannot be denied me as a King, because it belongs to me as a man and a Christian, owning the dictates of* none but God above me, as obliging me to consent. Better for me to die enjoying this empire of my soul, which subjects me only to God, so far as by reason or religion He directs me, than live with the title of a king, if it should carry such a vassalage with it as not to suffer me to use my reason and conscience in which I declare as a king to like or dislike. So far am I from thinking the majesty of the crown of England to be bound by any Coronation Oath, in a blind and brutish formality to consent to whatever its subjects in Parliament shall require, as some men wiU needs infer, while denying me any power of a negative voice as king, they are not ashamed to seek to deprive me of the liberty of using my reason with a good conscience, which themselves and all the commons of England enjoy proportionable to their influence on the public ; who would take it very ill to be urged not to deny whatever myself, as King, or the House of Peers with me, should not so much desire as enjoin them to 30 Ujwn His Majesty' pass. I think my oath fully discharged in that point by my governing only by such laws as my people, with the House of Peers, have chosen, and myself consented to. I shall never think myself conscientiously tied to go as oft against my conscience as I should consent to such new proposals which my reason, injustice, honour, and religion, bids me deny. Yet so tender I see some men are of their being subject to arbitrary government, that is, the law of another's will, to which themselves give no consent, that they care not with how much dishonour and absurdity they make their King the only man that must be subject to the will of others, without having power left him to use his own reason, either in person or by any representation. And if my dissentings at any time were, as some have suspected and uncharitably avowed, out of error, opinionativeness, weakness, or wilfulness, and what they call obstinacy in me, (which not true judgment of things, but some vehement prejudice or passion hath fixed on my mind,) yet can no man think it other than the badge and method of slavery by savage rudeness and importunate obtrusions of violence to have the mist of his error and passion dispelled, which is a shadow of reason, and must serve those that are destitute of the substance. Sure that man cannot be blamable to God or man who seriously endeavours to see the best reason of things, and faithfully follows what he takes for reason. The uprightness of his intentions will excuse the possible failings of his understanding. If a pilot at sea cannot Ptethriiient from. Westminster. 31 see the pole star, it can be no fault in him to steer his course by such stars as do best appear to him. It argues rather those men to be conscious of their defects of reason and convincing arguments, who call in the assistance of mere force to carry on the weakness of their counsels and proposals. I may in the truth and uprightness of my heart protest before God and men that I never wilfully opposed or denied anything that was in a fair way, after full and free debates, propounded to me by the two Houses, further than I thought in good reason I might and was bound to do. Nor did anything ever please me more than when my judgment so concurred with theirs, that I might with good conscience consent to them ; j^ea, in many things, where not absolute and moral necessity of reason, but temporary convenience on point of honour was to be considered, I chose rather to deny myself than them, as preferring that which they thought necessary for my people's good before what I saw but convenient for myself. For I can be content to recede much from my own interests and personal rights, of which I conceive myself to be master, but in what concerns truth, justice, the rights of the Church, mj?- crown, together with the general good of my kingdoms, all which I am bound to preserve as much as morally lies in me, here I am and ever shall be fixed and resolute ; nor shall any man j^ain my consent to that wherein my heart gives my toD'Tjuc or hand the lie ; nor will I be brought to affirm 32 i'jyon His Majesty's that to men which in my conscience I denied before God. I would rather choose to wear a crown of thorns with my Saviour, than to exchange that of gold, which is due to me, for one of lead, whose embased flexibleness shall be forced to bend and comply to the various and oft contrary dictates of any factions, when instead of reason and public concernments they obtrude nothing but what makes for the interest of parties, and flows from the partialities of private wills and passions. I know no resolutions more worthy a Christian king, than to prefer his conscience before his kingdoms. mil God, iiroierve TJii/ ficrvfoit in this native, rational, and religious freedom, for this, I believe, is Thy will that ive should maintain; ivho, though Thou dost justly require us to submit our understandings and ivills to Thine, ichose u'isdom and goodness can neither err nor misguide us, and so far to deny our carnal reason in order to Thy sacred mysteries and commands, that we should believe and obey rather than dispute them ; yet dost Thou expect from us only such a reasonable service of Thee, as not to do any- thing for Thee against our consciences; and as to the desires of men, enjoinest us to try all things by the touchstone of reason and laws, which are the rules of civil Justice, and to declare our consent to that only which our judgments approve. Thou hnotvest, O Lord, how umvilling I was to desert that place in which thou hast set me, and whereto the affairs of my kingdoms at present do call me. My people can witness how far I have been content for Retirement from Westminster. 33 their good to deny myself in what Thou hast subjeeted to my disposal. let not the unthankful importunities and tumultua/ry violence of some men's immoderate demands ever betray me to that degenerons and unmanly slavery, which should make me strengthen them by my consent in those things which I think in my conscience to be against Thy glory, the good of my subjects, and the discharge of my oivn duty to reason and justice. Make me willing to suffer the greatest indignities and injuries they press upon me, rather than commit the least sin against my conscience. Let the just liberties of my people be, as well they may, preserved in fair and equal icays, icithout the slavery of my soul. Thou that hast invested me by Thy favours in the power of a Christian king, suffer me not to subject my reason to other men's passions and designs, which to me seeyn un- reasonable, tmjust, and irreligious ; so shall I serve Thee in the truth and uprightness of my heart, though I cannot satisfy these men. Though I be driven from among them, yet give me grace to walk always uprightly before Thee. Lead me in the ivay of truth and justice, for these, T know, ivill bring me at last to peace and happiness with Thee, though for these L have much trouble among men. This L beg of Thee for my Saviour'' s sake. 3-4 Upon the Queen's Departure VII. Upon the Queen's Departure and Absence OUT OF England. Although I have much cause to be troubled at my wife's departure from me and out of my dominions, yet not her absence so much as the scandal of that necessity which drives her away doth afflict me, that she should be compelled by my own subjects, and those pretending to be Protestants, to withdraw for her safety, this being the first example of any Protestant subjects that have taken up arms against their king, a Protestant. For I look upon this now done in England as another act of the same tragedy which was lately begun in Scotland ; the brands of that fire, being ill quenched, have kindled the like flames here. I fear such notions, so little to the adornment of the Protestant profession, may occasion a further alienation of mind and divorce of aflections in her from that religion, which is the onl}^ thing whereiu we differ. Which yet God can, and I pray He would, in time take away, and not suffer these practices to be any obstruction to her judgment, since it is the motion of those men, for the most part, who are jet to seek and settle their religion for doctrine, government, and good manners, and so not to' be imputed to the true English Protestants, who continue firm to their former settled principles and laws. I am sorry my relation to so deserving a lady should be any occasion of her danger and affliction, whose and Absence out of Eiujland. 35 merits would have served her for a protection among the savage Indians, while their rudeness and barbarity knows not so perfectly to hate all virtues as some men's subtilty doth, among whom I yet think few are so ma- licious as to hate her for herself. The fault is, that she is my wife. All justice, then, as well as affection commands me to study her security, who is only in danger for my sake. I am content to be tossed, weather-beaten, and ship- wrecked, so as she may be in safe harbour. This comfort I shall enjoy by her safety in the midst of my personal dangers, that I can perish but half if she be preserved ; in whose memory and hopeful posterity I may yet survive the malice of my enemies, although they should be satiated with my blood. I must leave her and them to the love and loyalty of my good subjects, and to His protection who is able to punish the faults of princes, and no less severely to revenge the injuries done to them by those who in all duty and allegiance ought to have made good that safety which the laws chiefly provide for princes. But common civility is in vain expected from those that dispute their loyalty ; nor can it be safe for any relation to a king to tarry among them who are shaking hands with their allegiance, under pretence of laying faster hold on their rehgion. It is pity so noble and peaceful a soul should see, much more suffer, the rudeness of those who must make up their want of justice with inhumanity and impudence. 36 Upon the Queen^s Departure Her sympathy with me in my afflictions will make her virtues shine with greater lustre, as stars in the darkest nights, and assure the envious world that she loves me, not my fortunes. Neither of us but can easily forgive, since we do not so much blame the unkindness of the generality and vulgar ; for we see God is pleased to try both our patience by the most self-punishing sin, the ingratitude of those who, having eaten of our bread and being enriched with our bounty, have scornfully lift up them- selves against us : and those of our own household are become our enemies. I pray God lay not their sin to their charge, v/ho think to satisfy all obligations to duty by their corban of religion, and can less endure to see, than to sin against, their benefactors as well as their sovereigns. But even that policy of my enemies is so far venial, as it was necessary to their designs, by scandalous articles and all irreverent demeanour to seek to drive her out of my kingdoms ; lest by the influence of her example — eminent for love as a wife and loyalty as a subject — she should have converted to, or retained in their love and loyalty, all those whom they had a purpose to pervert. The less I may be blest with her company, the mere I will retire to God and my own heart, whence no malice can banish her. My enemies may envy, but the}'' can never deprive me of the enjoyment of her virtues while I enjoy myself. and Absence out of England. 37 TJiou, Lord, tvhose justice at present sees Jit to scatter us, let Thy mercy, in Thy due time, re-imite us on earth, if it he Thy tvill; hoivever, hring us both at last to Thy heavenly kingdom. Preserve us from the hands of our despiteful and deadly enemies, and prepare us hy our sufferings for Thy presence. Though we differ in some things as to religion, tvhich is my greatest temporal infelicity, yet. Lord, give and accept the sincerity of our ((ffections, ivhich desire to seek, to find, to embrace every truth of Thine. Let both our hearts agree in the love of Thyself, and Christ crucified for us. Teach us both what Thou ivouldest have us to know in order to Thy glory, our piMic relations, and our souls' eternal good, and make us careful to do what good we hioiv. Let neither ignorance of what is necessary to be knoicn, nor unhelief or disobedience to what loe knoiv, be our misery or our ivilful default. Let not this great scandal of those my subjects lohich profess the same religion with me, be any hindrance to her love of any truth Thou wouldst have her to learn, nor any hardening of her in any error Thou wouldst have cleared to her. Let mine and other menh constancy be an antidote against the 2Joiso?t of their example. Let the truth of that religion I profess be represented to her judgment with all the beauties of humility, loyalty, charity and peaceableness, which are the proper fruits and ornaments of it; not in the odious disguises of levity. 38 Ujwn His Majesty's Rejmlse at Hiillj schism, heresy, noveUy, cruelty, and disloyalty, u'hich some moi's praetiees have lately put upon it. Let her see Thy sacred and saving truths as Thine, that she may helieve, love, and oley them, as Thine, cleared from all rust and dross of human mixtures. That in the glass of Thy truth she may see Thee in those mercies lohicli Thou has offered to us in Thy Son Jesus Christ our only Saviour, and serve Thee in all those holy duties ichich most agree ivith His holy doctrine and most imitahle example. The experience ive have of the vanity and uncertainty of all human glory and greatness in our scatterings and eclipses, let it mahe us hoth so much the more ambitious to he invested in those duralle honours and perfections ivhicli are only to he found in Thyself, and obtained through Jestis Christ. Mill. Upon His Majesty's Repulse at Hull, and the Fates of the Hothams. My repulse at Hull seemed at the first view an act of so rude disloyalty, that my greatest enemies had scarce confidence enough to abet or own it. It was the first overt essay to be made how patiently I could bear the loss of my kingdoms. God knows it aff'ected me more with shame and sorrow for others than with anger for myself; nor did the affi'ont done to me trouble me so much as their sin, which admitted no colour or excuse. and the fates of the Hothams. 39 I was resolved how to bear this and much more with patience ; but I foresaw they could hardly contain themselves within the compass of this one unworthy act, who had efirontery enough to commit or counten- ance it. This was but the hand of that cloud which was soon after to overspread the whole kingdom, and cast all into disorder and darkness. For it is among the wicked maxims of bold and dis- loyal undertakers, that bad actions must always be seconded with worse, and rather not be begun, than not carried on, for they think the retreat more danger- ous than the assault, and hate repentance more than perseverance in a fault. This gave me to see clearly through all the pious disguises and soft palliations of some men, whose words were sometimes smoother than oil, but now I saw they would prove very swords. Against which I having, as yet, no defence, but that of a good conscience, thought it my best policy with patience to bear what I could not remedy. And in this I thank God, I had the better of Hotham, that no disdain or emotion of passion transported me by the indignity of his carriage, to do or say anything unbe- seeming myself, or unsuitable to that temper which in greatest injuries I think best becomes a Christian, as coming nearest to the great example of Christ. And indeed I desire always more to remember I am a Christian than a king, for what the majesty of the one might justly abhor, the charity of the other is willing to bear ; what the height of a king tempteth to revenge, the 40 Upon His Majesty's Repulse at Hull, humility of a Christian teacheth to forgive. Keeping in compass all those impotent passions, whose excess injures a man more than his greatest enemies can, for these give their malice a full impression on our souls, which otherways cannot reach very far, nor do us much hurt. I cannot but observe how God, not long after, so pleaded and avenged my cause in the eye of the world, that the most wilfully blind cannot avoid the displeasure to see it, and with some remorse and fear to own it as a notable stroke and prediction of divine vengeance. For Sir John Hotham, unreproached, unthreatened, uncursed by any secret language or imprecation of mine, only blasted with the conscience of his own wickedness, and failing from one inconstancy to another, not long after pays his own and his eldest son's heads as forfeitures of their disloyalty, to those men from whom surely he might have expected another reward than thus to divide their heads from their bodies, whose hearts with them were divided from their king. Nor is it strange that they who employed them at first in so high a service, and so successful to them, should not find mercy enough to forgive him who had so much premerited of them, for apostacy unto loyalty some men account the most unpardonable sin. Nor did a solitary vengeance serve the turn ; the cutting ofl' one head in a family is not enough to expiate the afiront done to the head of the Commonweal. The eldest son must be involved in the punishment, as he was infected with the sin of the father against the and the Fates of the Hotlmms. 41 father of his country ; root and branch God cuts off in one day. These observations are obvious to every fancy. God knows I was so far from rejoicing in the Hothams' ruin (though it were such as was able to give the greatest thirst for revenge a full draught, being executed by them who first employed him against me,) that I so far pitied him, as I thought he at first acted more against the light of his conscience than I hope many other men do in the same cause. For he was never thought to be of that superstitious sourness which some men pretend to in matters of reli- gion, which so darkens their judgment that they cannot see anything of sin and rebellion in those means they use, with intents to reform to their models of what they call religion, who think all is gold of piety which doth but glitter with a show of zeal and fervency. Sir John Hotham was, I think, a man of another temper, and so most liable to those downright tempta- tions of ambition which have no cloak or cheat of religion to impose upon themselves or others. That which makes me more pity him is, that after he began to have some inclinations towards a repentance for his sin, and reparation of his duty to me, he should be so unhappy as to fall into the hands of their justice, and not my mercy, who would as willingly have forgiven him as he could have asked that favour of me. For I think clemency a debt which we ought to pay to those that crave it, when we have cause to believe that they would not after abuse it, since God Himself 42 Upon His ^lajenty^s Repidse at Hull, suffers us not to pay anything for His mercy, but only prayers and praises. Poor gentleman, he is now become a noteable monument of unprosperous disloyalty, teaching the world by so sad and unfortunate a spectacle, that the rude carriage of a subject towards his sovereign carries always its own vengeance as an unseparable shadow with it : and those oft prove the most fatal and implac- able executioners of it, who were the first employers in the service. Aftertimes will dispute it whether Hotham were more infamous at Hull or at Tower-hill, though it is certain that no punishment so stains a man's honour as wilful perpetrations of unworthy actions ; which besides the conscience of the sin, brand with the most indelible characters of infamy the name and memory to posterity, who, not engaged in the factions of the times, have the most impartial reflection on the actions. But Thou, Lord, who hast in so remarhahJe a waij avenged Thy servant, suffer me not to tahe any secret l^leasure in it ; for as his death hath satisfied the injury he did to me, so let me not hy it yratify any passio7t i?i me, lest I make Thy vengeance to he mine, and consider the affront against me more than the sin against Thee. Thou, indeed, without any desire or endeavour of mine, hast made his mischief to return on his own head, and his violent dealing to come doum on his own pate. Thou hast pleaded my cause, even hefore the sons of men. and talrn the matter into Thine own hands, that men mat/ and the Fates of the Hothams. 43 hnow if was Thy work, and see that Thou, Lord, ha.sf done it. I do not, I dare not say, so let mine enemies perish, Lord; yea, Lord, rather give them repentance, pardon, and impunity if it he Thy blessed will. Let not Thy justice prevent the ohjects and opportunities of my mercy ; yea, let them live and amend tvho have most offended me in so hiyh a nature, that I may have those to forgive who hear most ])roportion in their offencei^ to those trespasses against Thy majesty, which L hope Thy mercy hath forgiven me. Lord, lay not their sins {who yet live) to their charge for condemnation, hut to their consciences for amendment. Let the lightning of this thunderholt, ivhich hath heen so severe a punishment to one, he a terror to all. Discover to them their sin, who hiow not they have done amiss, and scare them from their sin, that sin of malicious wichedncss. That pt'cvettting Thy judgments hy their true rep)e}itance they may escape the strohes of Thine eternal vengeance. jLid do Thou, Lord, estahlish the throne of Thy servant in mercy and truth meeting together. Let my crown ever flourish in righteousness and peace hissing each other. Hear my prayer, Lord, who has taught us to pray for, to do good to, and to love our enemies for Thy sake, who hast prevented us tuith overtures of Thy love, even when we were Thine enemies, and hast sent Thy Son Jesus Christ to die for us when we were disposed to crucify ILim. 44 \Upon the Lifthui and Raisin