PRINCETON, N. J. Wie.>,>,/n/ /y T\.YX\sArm Shelf.. Dhu Sedicii Nttll! IHE CHARACTERISTICK OF APOSTOLICK PREACHING ^ 'M^m UELITEHED IJf THE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF PHILADELPHIA, AT THE OPENING OF THE GEKSRAI. ASSEIklBLY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES, MAY 19, 1825. BY ASHBEL GREEN, D.D. XtlE MODERATOR OF THE PRECEDING YEAR- PHILADELPHIA: Printed by Clark & Jiaser, 33 Carter's Alhi'. 1825. THE CHARACTERISTICK OF APOSTOLICK PREACHING. 1 Cor. i. 23 — first part: " But we preach Christ crucified — " It appears from internal evidence that the epistle in which we find these words was written to the Corinthians by the apostle Paul, in answer to one which they had sent to him. In their letter, they had requested him to resolve certain doubts, in regard to Christian duty ; and to regulate certain points of order, in their ecclesiastical concerns. On these subjects they seem to have given him distinct information. But there were other things, and things of far greater im- portance, of which it appears they gave him no information; and which, therefore, it is probable, they were desirous to conceal. The truth was, that certain false teachers had crept into the church at Corinth, in the absence of the apostle, and had obtained an influence which they had used for the most perni- cious purposes. They had endeavoured to persuade the Corin- thians that the apostleship of Paul, if not altogether a false assumption, was at least far inferior in dignity and authority, to that of those who had been the stated companions of the Saviour in the days of his flesh. They had produced and fomented the most unhappy divisions in the church ; and cor- ruption, as usually happens, was the companion of discords One of the members of that church, probably with the coun- tenance of these false teachers, liad been permitted, without censure, to commit and continue in a most flagitious immo- rality. Without opposition from tiieni, il' not with their con- currence or connivance, the sacrament of the Lord's Supper had been most awfully profaned. In their publick addresses, the false philosophy, and subtle reasonings, and specious elo- quence of the Sophists, had been substituted for the plain and simple enunciation of evangelical truth. By these, and by whatever other means they could devise, they had courted popularity, and laboured to destl\Dy the influence of the in- spired founder of the Corinthian church, \vho had gathered it from among the heathen. — His doctrines and manner of preaching, were, in many respects, in direct opposition to theirs; and unless they could subvert his authority they could not establish their own. But although the success of these insidious men had been worthy of a better cause, it was not such but that the Corinthian Christians, when serious difficulties and embarrassments arose, resorted to their first and best friend for counsel. He, with his usual address, seized the occasion of answering their let- tei', not only to reply to their inquiries, but to reprove their vices, to correct their errors, to assert his full apostolick powers, and to recal them to the purity and simplicity of the gospel. Although they had not informed him, yet he tells them frankly, that it had been declared to him by those " ot the house of Chloe," tiiat there were contentions among them. He lets them know that he was apprized of their retaining in their communion an incestuous person, and of the base arts by whidi the minds of some of them had been alienated from himself He addresses them, nevertheless, with the utmost tenderness and afl'ection, commends them freely for whatever was praiseworthy among them, and takes occasion, through- out the epistle, to mingle much important doctrinal truth,. and much pious sentiment, with all that he says. But he makes no compromise with their erroneous opinions and un- lawful practices. He insists peremptorily, in writing, oa every thing which he had taught and enjoined, when he was personally Vvith them. It is while he is doing this that our text is introduced. — And let it be well observed, that it is in- troduced among the very first points which the apostle sets himself to maintain. He probably gave it this precedence and prominence, because a right method of preaching, or of publickly teaching and enforcing gospel doctrine, is plainly a matter of the utmost importance in itself, and because this was one of the chief particulars in which he differed from the false teachers, with whom he was at issue. — They preached in one way, and he in another. Their manner of preaching he pointedly condemns. That of his faithful brethren and. himself, he not only defends, but declares his determination inflexibly to pursue. — " We preach Christ crucified." You are aware, brethren, that what the apostle here first announces, he afterwards dwells upon, witlf great emphasis. So soon as he had yielded a little to a tide of holy feeling, by which we often find him borne off to a short distance from his malt! object, he returns to the subject of our text. In the beginning of the next chapter he says, " And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with the excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ and him crucified." Here, then, we have the declaration of the great apostle ol the Gentiles, who certainly spake as well as wrote under the divine guidance, in regard to a system of preaching which he had adopted among the Corinthians, to the exclusion ol every other : and as we have no reason, to believe that he preached to them differently from what he did to others, we may say, without hesitation or reserve, that this was the sys- tem, in conformity with which he always preached. Must it not, then, be highly important and interesting to all, and especially to the ministers of the gospel, to ascertain distinct- ly what this system of preaching was? and what were the reasons which determined the apostle to adopt it, and to ad- here to it with undeviating constancy ? These two points I shall endeavour, in a reliance on divfne aid, to illustrate, in the sequel of this discourse; and then to make a short appli- c,ation of the subject. # g I. What was that system of preaching which the apostle de- clared that he had adopted, to the exclusion of every other. In the text, he calls it the preaching of Christ crucified. Here it is manifest, that there is a reference to some' one great truth, or doctrine, which formed the substance of the apostle's addresses, both publick and private. — I mention private ad- dresses, as well as publick, because, from the circumstances in which St. Paul was placed among the heathen, much of his preaching was not addressed to large assemblies, but to fami- lies or individuals — from. house to house. It should also be carefully noted, that it is plain from his declaration, that he used the contemplated doctrine, equally in the conversion of the heathen, and In the edification of Christian believers. Now, as the naked and unconnected truth or fact, that Christ was crucified, could be of no use, especially to those who had never before heard of his name, it is too evident to require proof, that the apostle must have connected with this fact, all the information necessary to render it available to the purpose for which he announced it to them. He must have told them from the first, what necessity there was that Christ should be crucified, and what was the great design of God in the life, sufferings and death, of our blessed Redeemer. What this information actually was, we may collect from the writ- ings left us by the apostle; and it is believed that, in a sum- mary statement, it will be nearly this — That all mankind be- ing, by reason of sin, in a lost and helpless state, and exposed to everlasting misery, God our heavenly Father, so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life; That Christ Jesus was this Son of God, who most willingly undertook the work of our redemption, came from heaven to earth on this most benevolent errand, assumed human nature into a personal union with his own divine nature, and thus be- came God and man, the fit mediator between the parties to be reconciled in the great concern of man's salvation: That the Redeemer, having taken the sinner's place as his substitute and surety, perfectly obeyed and honoured the law which man had disobeyed and dishonoured, satisfied divine justice completely, by enduring the full penalty of the law, in a whole life of humihation and suffering, and especiall}'^ by a death of unspeakable agony and infamy — denominated the cursed death of the cross — and which, as a principal part of his work, is, for that reason, often put for the whole: That the Redeemer, after being laid in a tomb, rose from the dead on the third day, ascended to heaven, and to the right hand of the Father, there to appear forever as the intercessor and advocate of his people: That thence he sent down the Holy- Spirit, to instruct his apostles fully in the nature of his king- dom; to enable them, without study, to speak various lan- guages; to confer on them the power of working miracles; and to complete, without error, the canon of sacred scrip- ture; and also, in every age, to make a saving application of the Redeemer's work to tlie human heart, renewing it unto holiness, and implanting and cherishing in it all the Christian graces: That for the sake of what Christ has done, God can now be just and the justifier of him that believeth in Jesus, even though he be the chief of sinners; and that in the preaching of the gospel, he invites and commands every sin- ner who hears it, to come and receive a complete salvation, through this precious and all sufficient Saviour : That accord- ingly, whenever a sinner, under the influence of the blessed Spirit becomes sensible of his guilt and misery, and on the free offer of Christ and his benefits in the gospel, actually com- mits his soul by faith to the Saviour, as his sole reliance, he is pardoned and justified, and shall never come into condem- nation — That by faith he is united to Christ and made one with him; the righteousness of Christ is imputed to him, or reckoned as liis; the work of sanctification, by which he is prepared for heaven, is commenced in his soul; and .the grace of evangelical repentance, with Qyevy other grace, being there begun, shall be cherished and carried on, in a course of sin- cere but imperfect obedience to all the commands of God ; till at deatli, he shall become perfect in holiness, and rise to the enjoyment of all the bliss of heaven : That thus it shall be with all who accept the gospel offer; while ail who hear and do not accept it, shall be consigned to hopeless misery: That there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and the unjust, when the soul and body of every individual shall be reunited ; and when, before the assembled universe, the Redeemer shall award to his friends eternal life, in his king- dom of glory, and to his enemies eternal punishment, with the devil and his angels. Such, brethren, it is believed, is a statement, materially correct, of the doctrine of Christ crucified, with its essential appendages. It is, indeed, by no means pretended, that this statement is so accurate as to preclude all amendment; or that it may not admit of some modifications, \yithout destroying its essence. But it is maintained, that if this was not the substance of what the apostle intended, when he said " We preach Christ crucified," it will not be practicable to show, in any just or even plausible manner, what he did intend. Much of the subsequent part of this epistle, and much indeed of afll his epistles, demonstrates that we have fairl}' represented the scope and spirit of his meaning in the text. As to the apostle's determination to know, or preach, no- thing else, than the doctrine of a cmcified Saviour, it may be remarked, that judging of what he delivered orally, by "vhat we find in his writings, he certainly did not confine himself to the dry and incessant reiteration of the truths we have detailed. On the contrary, we find him expressly af- firming, that he had not shunned to declare the whole coun- sel of God ; and there is actually apparent in his writings, a whole system of theological truth, and of evangelical ethicks, extensively taught and powerfully inculcated. But that all this is perfectly consistent with what we have given as the import of the text, may be shown by an illustration, taken from the words of our Saviour himself. He told the Jews, that on two commandments, relating to the great principle of love — love to God and love to man — hang all the law and the prophets. In like manner, we alfirm, that although the apostle declared many truths, taught many doctrines, and 9 urged many duties, lie still knew nothing hut Jesus Christ and him crucified, because every thing was made by him to liang upon, the cross. The truths which we have recited, were so much and so often insisted on, that they formed a large and the most j)rominent part of his system, and thus gave to it its distinctive character and appellation. All his teaching, moreover, whatever was the subject or the occasion, savoured strongly of the cross; it always had a manifest consistency, and generally a jjlain connexion, with the doctrine of Christ crucified — From this doctrine it was often immediately derived; frequently it was little else than the ramification, or carrying out, of this doctrine, into its proper consequences; and not seldom, the teaching and illus- tration of some related truth, serving to give it clearness and effect. In a word, the doctrine of Christ crucified, was the sun of the apostle's theological system, which imparted lus- tre to every other truth, directed its course, and kept it to its proper orbit — The sun which threw off its beams of hea- venly radiance in all directions, to warm, and cheer, and ani- mate those who were already sjiiritually alive, and to waken into life, those who were yet slumbering in the frost and death of sin; which gave vitality and productive energy to every evangelical principle and precept; and to which every ray of truth might be traced back, as to its proper source; and to whose full orbed splendour every Christian eye was often directed, to catch some glimpses of a glory too intense for a full and steady vision, till mortality should be swallow- ed up of life, J^et us now inquire — II. What were the reasons which determined the apostle to adopt, and inflexibly to adhere to, the system of publick teach- ing, which has been explained — to the preaching of Christ crucified. There were two reasons for this, which we may collect from the writings of our apostle; and it will appear that they were entirely sufficient to justifiy the determination he had formed, and to justify the same determination, in every mi- B 10 nister of Christ, to the end of the world. In the first place — The apostle knew that it was the purpose of God to bless the preaching of Christ crucified, and ordinarily to bless no other kind of preaching than this, both for the conversion of sin- ners and the edification of saints. This reason is distinctly assigned, and the explanation of it pretty largely stated, in immediate connexion with the text. "Christ," says the apostle, "sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with the wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect. For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved, it is the power of God. For it is written — I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understand- ing of the prudent. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made fool- ish the wisdom of this world? For after that, in the wisdom of God, the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God, \)y the foolishness of preaching, to save them that believe. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wis- dom. But we preach Christ crucified; unto the Jews a stumb- ling block, and unto the Greeks foolishness. But unto them that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. Because the fijolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men." No laboured exposition is necessary, to show the di- rect and decisive bearing of this extended quotation on the point before us. The apostle reminds the Corinthians that the experiment had been fully tried, as to what the wisdom of this world could effect, in teaching the knowledge of God, aitd in the reformation of mankind. For four thousand years the experiment had been continued, and after all, the world by its boasted wisdom knew not God; but was sunk in the most sottish idolatry, the most degrading vice, and the most horrible wickedness. This had been permitted, in the wis- dom and just judgment of-God, that contempt might be pour- ed on the proud devices of men ; and to prepare the way for +hp device of God, to instruct and convert the world by the 11 foolishness of preaching — that preaching of a crucified Safioiu' Which the learned and philosophick Greek derided as foolish- ness, and which the proud and prejudiced Jew found to be a stumbling block, because it was death to all his hopes of a splendid conquering Messiah, who should raise his nation to supreme worldly dominion. Still, however, the preaching of Christ crucified had been proved, by undeniable facts, to be the power and the wisdom of God, unto the salvation of multitudes. The doctrine of tiie cross, unaided by philoso- phical reasonings, and unadorned by a specious eloquence, but in full opposition to both, had done more in a few years, to enlighten and convert the world, than had been done be- fore, by all the wit of man, from the beginning of time till that hour. Thus the foolishness of God— that plan of his which vain mortals had esteemed foolishness — had been prov- ed to be wiser than men, with all their boasted sagacity and refinement: And the weakness of God— the system which they charged with weakness— lo be stronger than men:— un- speakably more powerful in turning men to righteousness, than all the fancied force of reason and argument, on which they relied. God, therefore, had set his seal on this system as his own — As such he had blessed it, and would bless it. But as for any difi'ercnt or opposite system, it was of course theHm/of his, and therefore he had not, and ordinarily would not, use it in his service nor confer on it any blessing. The sense here given, brethren, of the passage quoted, is coincident with that which may be found in all the best com- mentators who have ever expounded it; nor can any other be o-iven, which shall not manifestly appear to be harsh and forced in the extreme. The reason we are considering, consists, you observe, of two parts. — The first is, that it is God's purpose to bless the doctrine or preaching of the cross. — The second, that he or- dinarily blesses nothing else. We shall dispose of the latter part first, and in a very few words. We say that God ordinarily blesses no other preaching than that of Christ crucified, because we ought to admit and \2 remember, that as the author of our text was converted while Oil his way to persecute the Christians at Damascus, so there have been a i'ew examples in every asje, of men who have been met with, and brought to the saving knowledge of the truth, in circumstances, and by means, of the most unpro- mising character. All such instances are striking exceptions., to God's ordinary method .of dispensing his grace. They are intended to exhibit the divine sovereignty, and to demon- strate that although he usually employs well adapted means, he can work without them, and even in opposition to those which he ordinarily uses. The instances of the kind con- templated, are exceedingly rare, and !jy being so, evidently appear to be exceptions to a general rule, and serve, not to invalidate, but to confirm it. Having shown the nature of this exception, I remark, that the position we maintain — that it is the preaching of Christ crucified, and that only, \vliich God ordinarily blesses — is firmly established by a series of striking and undeniable facts, in every age of the Christian church. Did our limits permit, it w^ould be a pleasing employment to take a general survey of these facts. But we have time only to glance at a few. Others will doubtless occur to many in whose presence 1 now speak. , First of ail, let us turn our attention for a few moments to the apostolick age. Of all the apostles, Paul laboured most> and with the most success. Now we have seen what was exclusively the method of preaching adopted by him, and his immediate associates — " We preach Christ crucified." All the churches, then, which he gathered from among the hea- then, were composed of converts, made and edified by the preaching of the cross. Nor have we the least reason to be- lieve, that the preaching of the other apostles was diflerent from that of Paul. They were all taught and guided by one and the same Spirit, and doubtless pursued the same method of spreading the gospel. Beside, the short notices of their manner of discourse, -left us in the Acts, demonstrate that such was indeed the fact. Peter's sermon on the day of Pen- 13 tecost, his testimony, as the mouth of the whole apostolick college, before the Jewish Sanhedrim, and especially his dis- course to Cornelius, and those that were assembled with him, show clearly that it was Jesus Christ and him crucified, that was the burden of his powerful and wonder working ad- dresses. We may therefore affirm with confidence, that it was the preaching of Christ crucified, by the instrumentality of which the whole primitive church was formed, edified, and established in the world. There was philosophical, and rhe- torical, and legal, and logical preaching then, to the utter ex* elusion or complete disguise of the doctrine of the cross, as there has been in every succeeding age. It was exactly this which was employed by the false teachers in the Corinthian church. And what were its effects? They were noticed, in part, at the entrance of this discourse. They were such as they have commonly been since — formality, self-exaltation, claims to superior knowledge and sagacity, controversy, cor- ruption, immorality, profaning sacred institutions, and aliena- tion from apostolick truth and apostolick men. It probably was never made instrumental to gain a single convert to genuine Christianity, for our apostle solemnly warns Timothy to avoid and oppose it altogether. Look now to the Protestant reformation. And here, if wc inquire why reformation was necessary — the answer will be, that although there were things innumerable that called for it, yet, in the opinion of the great reformer himself, no single thing demanded it so loudly and imperiously, as this, that the doctrine. of justification with God, solely by the me- rits and righteousness of Christ, had been buried and lost amidst the corruptions and superstition of antichristian Rome. Yet, as fable sometimes indicates that its origin was truth, so, in the very superstition of popery, we find evidence that the doctrine of which I speak was the doctrine of the apostolick &