Ill if 4 THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, Princeton, N. J. | Case, jj | Shelf, SC< V I'" 1 "'- I o TwervVv three sermons ' J Mpo-n +he chief end arvr\a\r\ . The divine authority ot the Sacred Scrip+ures, "tine beinqfcvrid attributes oF Grcd^ and the doctrine, or fhetriVu+y. X «*M * *. TYecvch'd a+Pk'ilcxctelphia A.D.1^3. by Griloert lennent. Philadelphia Printed by W. Brcxdrord , 1744. P R E F A C E Candid Reader, EEING that Corrupt Principles tend to infect the Heart and Practice, it is therefore highly neceflary to beware of them j we read of damnable Herefies, as well as damnable Practices, ( zPet. ii. i.) Seeing that the main Doctrines of Religion, have, in a Meafure, the fame Relation to Piety in Practice, ■ as a Foundation to a Super- structure, it is therefore like building a Fabrick in the Air to inculcate the one without having regard to the other. It is doubtlefs a commanded and Important Duty to be Valiant for the Truth upon the Earth, and to contend for the Faith once deliver'd to the Saints : But how mall we be able to comply with this divine Precept, unlefs we know the Truths we are to be Zealous for ? And how can we expect to know them without the Ufe of proper Means to that End, fuch as Reading, Meditation, Prayer ? We>are commanded to hold faji the Form of found Words t 2 Tim. i. 1 3.. The original Word Hypotopofs^ fignifies a Scheme or Skeleton. This plainly intends not only the Re- lation and Harmony of the great Truths of Religion to and among each other, but theNecemty we lie under of ad- hering to them j but how mall we do this without Know- ledge ? To fuppofe that we need not know but a few Prin- ciples, and that the Knowledge of many hinders our reli- gion? Progrefs, is to reflect upon the Wifdomand Goodneis § of The Preface of God in revealing fo many in the Scriptures : And to fay in other Words that the chief Part of the Scriptures is Vain, or rather Prejudicial to our Souls benefit, which is an aw- ful Pofition ! If the Doctrines of the Scriptures need not be known, why have they been reveal'd ? Can they be of Service to us without our Knowledge of them ; but poflibly fome may Object that Paul affcrted, he defit'd to know nothing among the Corinthians but Jesus Christ and him crucify'd. I anfwerthat Place of Scripture is to be taken comparitively, viz. That he defir'd to know nothing fo much among them as Chrift and him crucify'd, he defir'd to make Chrift in his Perfon, Natures, Offices, Relations, and Sufferings, together with the Benefits thereby purchas'd, the principal Subject and main Scope of his minifteral Labours. He defir'd to make all his Sermons on every Subject tend to promote the Knowledge of Christ, Love to him and Faith in him. Neither is it unufual in Scripture to take abfolute Expreflions in a comparative Senfe. Thus the Almighty fayeth, That he will have Mercy and not Sacrifice^ i. e. rather than Sacrifice. Now if we take the aforefaid Scripture in another Senfe, viz. That Paid defir'd to know nothing more than the Doctrine of Christ's Crucifixion: This tends to caft contempt upon the chief Part of the Scriptures and render them vain and ufelefs. And it is like- wife contrary to the Apoftles Practice, for he preach 'd and wrote by divine Infpiration many other Truths j and furely he may be reafonably fuppos'd to know his own Litention beft. It is indeed cur Wifdom and our Duty to proportion the Degree of our Zeal, for the feveral Truths of Religion to their refpective Weight and Place in the Chriftian Syftem, but without Knowledge and Judgment this is Impracticable, We are enjoyn'd to continue in the Faith, grounded and fettled The Preface, fettled. Col. i. 23. But how can this be expected without the Knowledge of the Doctrines of Faith, can we continue in that which we know not ? Surely Ignorance is the Caufe of Unfteadinefs in the Principles of Religion -, be- caufe of this, fome are like Children tojjed to and fro, and carried about with every Wind of Dodlrine, by the Slight of Men and cunning Craftinefs, whereby they lie in wait to de- ceive, (Ephef. iv. 14.) It is no new Thing for falfe Teachers by good Words and fair Speaches to deceive the Hearts of the Simple, [Rom. xvi. 18.) The falfe Apoftles enfnar'd the Galatians by great Shews of Piety and Affection to them, as well as by unjuft Reflections againfr. faithful Minifters. Gal. iv. 17. They zealoujly a feci you, but not well, yea they would exclude us that you might affec~l them. Surely our Eftablimment in the great Principles of Re- ligion, tends to the Glory of God and our own growth in Goodnefs. This is our Excellency, and indeed it is one great End of theGolpel Miniftry. (Ephef. iv. 1 1,- — ij.) Where-* as the Contrary tends to the Dishonour of God and our felves, and much Mars our Growth in Holinefs : For how can a Plant thrive that is often mov'd ? Is it likely that thofe will glorify God by fuffering for Truth who know knot? Let us therefore abhor thefe Popi/h Principle's, viz. That Ignorance is the Mother of Devotion, and that it is our Duty to believe implicitely or limply. Surely without Know- ledge the Mind cannot be good. Acquaintance with the firft Principles of the Oracles of God enriches the Mind and is a Lamp to the Feet. The Knowledge of divine Truths in their due Series and Connection, much confirms our belief of them, and thereby inflames our Love, and Influences our Practice. To help forward that good Deflgn I have been induc'd to offer the following Difcourfes to publick View ;: and would entreat the Reader to perufe the whole before he condemns The Preface, condemns a Part, that fo he may have an Oppertunity of judging for himfelf whether the Truths therein contain'd do not harmonize among themfelves, and tend to promote the Glory of God as well as the Creatures felf Abafement and eternal Happinefs. And if they be found attended with thefe Characters, are they riot worthy of Credit and Accep- tance ? Surely the Doclrin.es of Religion mould not " be judged of according to the prejudices of our Education or corrupt ByarTes of PafTion, but calmly and impartially weighed in the Scales of Scripture and Realon. For Truth will not vary according to our Humour ; It is therefore un- doubtedly our Inter eft to know it, whether we like it or not. In the mean time we mould beware of retting fatisfy'd with the Doctrinal Knowledge of Truth, without feeling the ef- ficacious Influence thereof upon Heart and Life, for fuch as know their Mafters Will and do it not^ mufl expeft to be beaten with double flripes. Now that, the following Sermons may be blefTed of the mofl high God, to the equal promo- ting of Truth and Kolinefs, is the earned Defire and Prayer of thy Servant for Christ's Sake* Philadelphia, G. TENNENT. June 23. 1744. Introduction, 29. SERMON II I. Corinthians x. 31. Whether therefore ye eat or Drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the Glory of God. THE Heart is certainly the main Spring of practical Religion ^ when that is fet right in its aims, then all the Wheels of Motion keep their proper Distances and Spheres, and anfwer a valuable End : But when this main Spring is wrong fett, all is wrong ; the Motion of the Souls Powers is irregular and vain, becaufe it tends to a wrong Mark. It is therefore of the laft necemty that we be careful in yhufing of and fixing upon a right Mark in our Actions : /And what can this be but God and bis Glory ? Let us there- fore give him our Hearts, and make his Honour the chief fcope of all we do : It will be but of little Service to us to cleanfe the outiide of the Cup and Platter, if the infide be neglected, and our aims be wrong. Do not therefore think it flrange my Hearers, that I dwell fo long upon this Subject, for indeed it is the very turning Point and Foundation of all practical Godlineis. We our- felves are furely fuch as 9>ur governing aims be. You may remember that in the preceeding Sermon, I obferv'd the following Point of Truth, viz. That the great Mark at which wejlwuld aim chiefly, in &ll our Actions, whe- ther 3© The Labouring Point illujlr cited. ther Natural^ Civil or Religious ', is the Glory of the mojl high God. And that the Method I propos'd to purfue in the Pro- iecution of it, was as follows, viz. ift. I was to fhew the Kijids and Nature of God's Glory. II. What is fuppos'd by and imply d in our aiming at God's Glory. III. I purpofed to fhew how we Jhould glorify God. IV. Why we f/jould aim at his Glory, as our chief Mark in all our Acdiom. V. I was to Anfwer fome Objcclions to the contrary, and then proceed to fome practical Improvement of the Whole. The firft four general Heads I have difcourfed upon, that which yet remains to be treated of, as the Subject of the pre- fent Sermon, is the 5th general Head, namely to anfwer Objections. But before I proceed to treat directly upon the 5th Pro- pos'd, Ifliall beg Leave to cite fome Sentences, extracted from the writings of divers worthy Divine?, tending to con- firm and illuflrate what has been already offer 'd. And here I fhall firft mention, the GlofTes of fome Annotators upon the Text I am difcourfing from. Mr. Pool in his Annota- tions upon it, after having cited Prov. xvi. 4. The Lord hath made all Things for himfelf obferves, " That it is impofiible " itfhould be otherwise, for whereas every reafonable Agent, " both propounds to himfelf fome Reafon of his Actions, " and the beft End he can imagine ; it is impoffible, but " that God alfo in creating Man mould propound to him- " felf fome End, and there being no better End than his " own Glory, he could propound no other to himfelf : The " Glory of God being the End wfaieh he propounded to " himfelf in creating Man, it muft needs follow that that " muft be the chief and greateft End which any Man can " propound to himfelf in his Actions. To confirm this Glofs By the Teltimony of divers Dhir.es.. 3 1 . Glofs, he in his Criticks cites Menocbius y Efiius, Gr otitis y Meed> and Rabi Jonah, in his Book upon Fear, who fays, " That we ought to belive in one God, and direct all our " Actions to his Name, and that he who does not fo, is not " like to receive a Reward.'' Mr. Matthew Henery y upon the Words of our Text fays, " That in all we do,, we' mould aim at the Glory of God, " at pleafing and honouring him ; this is the fundamental " Principle of all practical Godlineis j the great End of all " practical Religion.- — -And upon Prov. xvL 4. he fays,. " That God is the firft Caufe,. and laft End of all,, M all is of him and from him, and therefore all is to him " and for him. He defigns tofervehis own Purpofe bv all " his Creatures, and he will not fail of his Deiign, the Wicked " he is not glorify'd by, but will, be glorifi'd' upon. Mr. Burkit upon the Words of our Text fayeth thus, u The Apoftle directs us r to refer all our Actions in genc- " ral, both natural, civil and religious to the Glory of God - " to make that our fepream Aim, our ultimate End in all " we do, in all we deiign, in all we defire. AChriftian iC is to perform his natural Actions to lpiritual Purpofe;, and " whilft he is feeding his Body at his own Table, muff, have " an Eye at his ferving God, both with Soul and Body, •* But efpecially and above all in our religious Duties, we " mult propound the Glory of God as our principal Aim, our * c chief Scope, Our fupream End. Doctor Bates in his Harmony of the Divine Attributes, p. 175,6. fays,. " That Godlinefs contains three Things, " j ft. That our Obedience proceeds from love to God, as " its vital Principle; this muft warm and animate the ex- " third cannot be thought of; but it can be neither of " thefe, as will appear.— 1. Becaufe the Creature is infe- " rior to him, a Man's End is to be look'd for, above him- " felf, and not beneath him ; but Man is iuperior to thefe. " 2. Becaufe that Man is theCreatures next End, that t^ere- " fore cannot be his lafl End, that that fhould be made " for Man's Service, and yet that Man mould be to ferve " that, implyeth a Contradiction. 3. Becaufe the Creatures' •" cannot fatisiy him, Man's lafl End and objective Happi- <{ nefs is the fame, {Eclef. i. 8.) 2. Neither can he be his " own lafc End : For, u The End mufl be foinething " better than the Means, that ferve to it. 2. There is a " better being, than Man, and therefore he cannot be his *' own chief End : The lafl End, and chief Good, are one *< and the fame ; there is therefore no refling, until we " come there. 3, A Man cannot be his own Happinefs, '" and therefore not his own chief End. An End that can- '■" not happify him, is not worthy of that Name ! Again " he aiTerts, that Man's next chief End, to the glorifying " of God is to enjoy him forever !' Mr. Vincent alio in his Expofition of the Aflembly's Ca- techiim, approv'd of by 40 Divines, is alfo of the fame Sen- timent with the reft I have mentioned j as appears from the Reafons he gives, why Men fliould chiefly defign the glorifying of God in all their Adions; which are thefe, viz. " becaufe y$ The labouring Point illuff rated.. *' becaufe God has made them, preferves them, has re- "" deem' d them, and given his Word and Spirit to direct 4< and affih?, and promiied his Kingdom to encourage them, - to glorify him.' See pag,^. From the aforeiaid Words it appears that Mr. Vincent look'd upon the Glory of God, to be the End and Happinefe but as a Motive, exciting to feek after it. I now proceed to the 5. General Head, which wastoanfwer Objections.. 03/Vr»- 1. " That which God promifes on his Part in his covenant Dealings, with Man is Man's chief 'Good, or which is the fame, Man's chief End-, but the Thing God promifes is Salvation, ergo. Had God p-omis'd any Thing lefs, it would not he call d the exceeding Riches of his Grace, and that Salvation ispro- mifed by God in his Covenant Dealings with Man; is evident from'Mark xvi.. 16. He that believeth, fhall be laved. Anf If that which God only or chierly promiied, in. the New-Covenant was Salvation, confider'd ftri&ly. and fubjectively, or feparated from his Glory, then the Confe- quence would avail,, otherwife not,, but God has no where promifed, a Salvation feparated from his Glory, as appears from what has been before obferved, to which I wiil add one Place of Scripture, Pf. 1. 15. Call upon me in the Day of Trouble y I wiil deliver thee, and thou Jhalt glorify me. Object. 2. It is our frfl and mo/l deeply Fundamental Dir- ty, to take the Lord for our God ; which mo/l ejj'entially in- cludes our taking him, [the Enjoyment of him, and ?iot oicr glorifying him, or his Glory) for our fupr earn Good, which is acknowleag 'd by all to be our chief End. Anf. The Notion of enjoying God, feparate from glo- rifying him, or his Glory j is an antifcriptural ridiculous Whim ! If it be a fundamental Duty, to take the Lord for our God^ then it mull be a fundamental Error (in practical Religion) to take our ielves for our God ; by prefering what refpeexs Objections anfwered. ,g refpects u"9, to his Honour, 'viz. our enjoying him, to his Glory .: For here God is not regarded for himfelf, but only as he refpects .us, it is true the Word-GOD is mentioned, in enjoying him, hut that is only a Flam, a Blind : For its ftill in Subordination to the fordid god-Self I Does not that Faith which is included, in taking the Lord for our God, draw »us out of ourfelves to Christ, and u- nite us to his Perfon, before it gives us Communion in his Benefits ? {Gal. ii. 20. Phil. iii. 8, 9.,) And does it not excite us to- admire the Former more than the Latter ? [Cant, ^v. 1 o.) Surely to thofe that believe, CHRIST is precious ! And is it not the Sign of an Harlot, to do the contrary, viz. to regard in Marriage, the Portion more than the Perfon ? ObjecT:. 3. Is praifing God for BJefings, a greater Gcod than ■the Bief lings for 'which they praife him? If Jo, the Saints havs a hard Bargain, in giving a greater Good for a lejs, if not, than the Enjoyment of God is a greater Good, than praifing cf him, and Jo is our chief Good and laft End\ Anf. I will be bold toaffert, that the Saints praifing God, is (terminatively) .more noble, than the Benefits they offer Praifes for, coniidered ftriclly ; becaufe of its near Relation to the beft of Beings ; neither is the Confequence reafon- ablc, that thus the Saints would have a hard Bargain, in giving a greater Good for a Ids. The Force of this Conie- quence, is built upon a fuppos'd Analogy, between civil Bargains among Men and the Saints praifing God for Benefits they receive from him, in the following Particu- lars. 1 . In civil Bargains, the Commodity a Perfon gives in exchange, for Good he deferves, he no ways owes be- fore to the Perfon he deals with. 2. The Good he gives is in his own Power, it is Jiis proper Right by Inheritance or Purchafe, which he can difpofe of as he fees bell, to ad- vance his worldly Intereft. 3. The Good exchang'd, is profitable &o-< Objections anfweredT. profitable, to tHe Receiver. 4. Tn this kind of Thick, whea there is not fome Proportion in the Value of the Things exchang'd, it's laid to be a. hard Bargain. If the Cafe was. fo in God's Dealings with his People, there would be fome Reafon for the aforefaid Confequence, otherwife none at all ! Are not Mens Praifes a Debt they owe to God upon many- Accounts, a Debt which they cannot pay, 'til Power be given them of God, and that brought into exercife by his gracious. Operations, a Power which they have no heredi- tary Right to, nor are they able to purchafe it by their Do- ings ; a Debt whicli when paid, profits not the Receiver, for our Goodnefs extends not to God. Tho' Praile be the Creatures Act, yet it is^God who works all our Works in us !. And thus the Sophifm evanifhes. Obj. 4. The End mid Scope of our Faith, is our chief 'End,., for Faith is the greatefi Duty, we Give to God, and the Foun- dation oj all the Re/?, yea it is the Gift cf God, and the great eft Gift we can receive in this World ; it hence follows, that the End of the greatefi Gift, and the great eft Duty, is Man's chief End y but the End oj Faith, is Salvation 1 Pet. i. 19.. Erg. Anf That which is the final or fupream Scope of Faith- is our chief End, no doubt, but what is only its interme- diate or fubordinate Scope, is not ; neither does the Place of Scripture aduc'd prove any more ! Obj. 5. Man 's greatefi Motive to Duty, is his chief End, but his greatefi Motive to Duty is his Saivatkn • Erg. the- Acti- ons of a rationaiCreature, niufl have a Motive or incitement \ for whoever aSh without a Motive , af'ts without Reafon: It is the di/iingufiug Charofft r cf a rational Creature, to propo/h to kimjdf an End, and then to pur f he \ din pre , tUds j hehi » Logicians tell us, the End is fir/l in the Inten- tisn v and laji in the Execution j which makes it evident, that the Objections anfwered. 4 r the Motive and the End arefynonimous, confequently the great- ejl or chief * Motive, is the chief End. Now that Man's great- eft Motive to Duty is his Salvation, appears from the follow- ing Places of Scripture-, are we commanded to be faithful to Death, what is the Motive Z Why thou malt receive a Crown of Life, Rev. ii. to. are we commanded to walk uprightly, and what is the Motive I Why the Lord will give Grace and Glory ; andlafily are we commanded to Love the Lord our God, with all our Heart and Soul, &c. And what is the Motive T Why this do, and thou flialt live, Luke x. 28. Anf. The Places of Scripture brought to confirm the a- fcrefaid Objection, do only prove, that the Expectation of obtaining Happinefs in the Way ofDuty, is a great Encou- ragement to the Performance of it ; and that it is fo pro- pos'd by God himfeif in his Word, but what is this to pur - pofe ? The Thing to be prov'd is, that Salvation ftric~tly and iubje&ively conndered, is the greatefl Motive to Duty : of this there is not a Word in the preceeding Proofs. The contrary thereto appears m the following Scriptures. (Mat,. v. 16. John xv. 8.) And let me farther add, that the afore- faid logical Maxim, ferves to prove the Glory of God, to be the chief End, thus, if that which islaft in Execution, is or ought to be the nrft: in Intention, then by confequence God's Glory ought to be nrft intended by us, becaufe it is laft in Execution, (Ephef. i. 6.) Obj. 6. That which the Saints, of both the Old and New- Teflament -made their great Motive to do and fuffer for God, we ought to make our great Motive,, &c. And that this is as aforefaid, our chief End, but the Saitits, Sec. made their Sal- vation their great Motive, Sec. Erg. Its hard if we cannot find one Saint in the Old or New-Te/rament that will direct us, what we ought to make our chief End, and they all made their Salvation their chief Motive ; For this Moles rcfyfid F t>y 42 Objections anfwered. to be called the Son of Pharaoh 's Daughter, and chofe to fuf- fer AffliSliom 'with the People of God 3 it is applicable to ali thefe Heroes, mentioned in the xi. of the Hebrews, as appears by the firft Verfe of the Chapter. Now Faith is the Sub- jlance of Things hoped for ; what was it that animated Paul, to j)refs towards the Mark, through all the Difficulties he met with ? why the Prize of the high calling in Christ Je- sus, Phil. iii. 14. What was the Motive, that enabled the Hebrews to take joyfully the Jpoi ling of their Goods ? why be- caufe they knew they had in Heaven a better and an enduring Subftance, Heb. x. 3, 4. What enabled the Apo files to bear with Patience, the AjfliSlions they fuff'erd but this ? that they work'd out for them, a far more exceeding, and eternal weight of Glory, 2 Cor. 4. 17. Anf. The Scriptures adduc'd in the Objection, do not prove the labouring Point, namely, that Salvation consi- dered ftrictly, was the higheft Motive of thofe good Men mentioned, and therefore the Argument does not conclude. The Objeclors Opinion concerning all God's People, is much what, with Satans concerning fob, as I humbly conceive j which appears thus, after God himielf had given an ho- nourable Character of fob, namely, that he was a fmcere Man, one that feared God and efchewed Evil, which imply an unfeigned Love to God's Majefty, and tranfcendent Re- gard to his Glory. But Satan in Oppofition to the jufl Encomium, that God himfelf had given of Job, fuggefts, that fob was not fuch an upright Man, that his religious Ser- vice did not fpring principally from Love to God, or Regard to his Glory ; but was directed to, by, and felfim Ends ; and therefore tliat he was but a Mercenary and a Hypocrite. Does he fear God for Nought, fa id Satan, touch all that he hath, & he will curje thee to thy Face. The Devil here insinuates, that Job had no noble internal Principles of Love arid Holineis, no fupream Objections cmfiverecf.. 43 fupream and endear'd Regard to the Divine Honour, but that he was mov'd chiefly or only, by outward felfifh Ref- pects j and that if thefe were taken away, he would quit his Religion entirely, and curfe his Maker ; this is in Subftance the lame with the Representation given by our ObjeBor, of all the Saints of the Old and New Teftament, in the Objection which I am now considering ; all the DifTeren- ees between the Objector's and Satan's Opinion, are thefe„ The Objector he holds, that the Saints eyed chiefly in all their Actions, the Happinefs of the higher Part of felf, the Soul ; but Satan the Happinefs of the lower Part of felf, the Body, the Objectors Opinion, concerns the whole Army of the Saints in all Ages, which is very uncharitable, but Satan's only a particular Perfon, namely, job. I know not that we have any Account in Scripture, that Satan has been fo bold as to impeach all the Saints at once, with the aforelaid Charge ! Again the Objector offers his Opinion as a Com- mendation of the Saints, which is not fo fenfibie as could have been wifh'd ; but Satan as an Accufation againit Job ! Once more the Objector offers his Opinion, with a deal of Confidence, and Airs of AfTurance j but Satan begins mo- deflly, and holds it till juft the Clofe of his Speech -, but the Objectors and Satans Opinion are the very fame in this fubflantial Point, namely, in excluding that tranfcendent Love to God for himfelf, and fupream Regard to his Glo- ry, which are eflential to true Godlinefs, and conftituting felfifh Confiderations in the Room tliereof. It is true the Objector has the Advantage of Satan in this particular, name- ly, in believing that the Saints had a chief Regard, to the Interefts of the higher Part of felf the Soul, whereas Satan was of Opinion, that Job eyed chiefly the Interelt of the lower Part of Se/f the. body. But again it mufl be own'd, that. Satan had the Advantage of the Objector, in other Par- F 2 ticulars Jje Objections anfwered. ticulars, viz. i In that he offer'd his Opinion as an Ac- cufation and fo the God of infinite Wifdom took it. 2. In that he did not accufe the whole Body of the Saints, by the Lump, but a particular Perfon. 3. That he manag'd his Argument with Modefty, for the moft Part, for he propos'd and iniifted on his Allegation, .(moftly) by way of Query does Job, faid he, fear God for nought ? Thus it is evident that the Objector and Satan harmonize in Judgment fubftantially, and differ only in the Cafe aforefaid, in fome Circumftances ; which if compar'd and weigh'd it would be hard to deter- mine, which had the better of it. But leaving the Decifi- on of this to Perfons of greater Capacities, I proceed to ob- ferve, that the Devils Accufation being offer'd, and the great God himfelf having another Opinion of Job's Integrity, puts the Matter to Iffue, and lets Satan try him with all his Darts ; (only to fpare his Life) the Devil being full of Rage, and Defire to make his Accuiation good, left he mould be potted for aLyar or falfe Accufer, as indeed he well deferv'd ; environ'd him with all his Terrors, and mot the mod: en- venom'd Darts at him that he had in all his Hellifh Qui- ver, he foon difrob'd him of all his Ornaments, and cruelly bereav'd him of his maffy Wealth, dear Relations, Health and Eafe, in a Hidden and tremenduous Manner ! And left him nothing but a fcolding Wife, who was almoft as great a Tormentor as himfelf, and fain would allure him to make the Enemy's Impeachment good, by curfing his God, whofe Language Sr. Richard Blackmore fets in jurt and flaming Colours, in the following Lines. Dofi thou not fee that thy Devotion's vain ? What have thy Prayers procur'd but Woe and Pain ! Haft thou not yet thine Inter eft underftood? Pcrverfely righteous, and abfurdly good I Thefi Objedtions anfwered 4; 7'heje painful Sores, and all thy Lo/fesjhow, How Heaven regards the fooliflo Saint below 1 Incorrigibly pious can't thy God, Reform thy fiupid Vertue with his Rod ! But even when poor Job, was under a horrible Com- plication of all manner of Mifery, that the fubtilty and Malice of his formidable Enemy, could invent and inflidt upon liis Mind and Body ; while in the mean Time, the God he loved withdrew his beamy Smiles, and on the contrary mot Arrows dipt in burning Vengeance, into his perplexed Soul, and compafs'd him with the moft affrighting Terrors ! I fay while Heaven it felf frown' d, and Earth and Hell confpir'd to difrrefs and make that gallant noble Soul, yet he remain'd, like a Rock impregnable amidfl all the boifterous Billows, with which he was environ 'd round : For notwithstanding fome humane Weakneiles, that drop't from his troubled Soul, in the Height of his Anguim ; yet he would never fpeak diihonourably of his God, or reproach- fully of his Religion ! He kept firm to the divine Majefty, in the midfl: of the terrible Tempeft ! And thus the Objec- tor and Satan (refpecting the Opinion aforefaid) are folidly confuted by the Book of Job. The Cafe now in contro- verfy, has been fairly try'd and God himfelf the Judge of Heaven and Earth, has brought in the Verdict in yob's Fa- vour, Job. i. 21. in all this Job finned net, nor charged God fool- lifily, and Chapt. xlii. y. Te have not fpoken of me the Thing that is Right as my Servant Job hath ! Obj. j. All the Works of God, were not made for one and the fame End: For if they were, there had been Need of but one fort of Beings only, if the Wicked are made for the Day of Evil, ought that to be always in their Eye ? ought all their Actions to tend to that, as their chief Go&d and loft End? Ought. j^6> Objections anfwered'.. Ought that to fire their AffecJions, raife their Defires,. and actuate their Wilis ? Secret Things belong to God,. Things reveal' d to us ! If there be a Covenant between God and Man, the Principal aim cf both cannot be the fame I In all Covenants there are two. contrasting Parties at leajt, a Mediator is not a Mediator of one, there is alfo the Thing covenanted fir, and the Confederation, or what each par- ty expeBs of the ether, what God expefis from us, is that we glorify him, and what he promifes-, is that he will be our God, er fuprcam Good, which certainly can be nothing kfs than the Enjoyment of him ! Anf. The Different forts of Creatures, ferve indeed differ- ent fubordinate or lower Endf, but what then ; can't they in the mean Time ferve one and the lame higheft. End ? Do not the brute Creation, while they ferve the Good of Mankind, at the fame Time objectively declare the Glory of God's Wif- dom, Power and Goodnefs in their Formation, Order and Ufefulnefs ? The End which the Almighty had in View in the Formation of all, viz. His Glory, is anfwered by all, tho' in a different Manner : Rational Creatures do or ought to glorify God ablively ; and for this they had a Capacity gi- ven them and a command laid upon them, and if they do it not aSlively, as it is their Duty, they^hall -pajjruely ; as the Pialmift juffly obferves, The very Heavens declare the Glory of God, and the Earth- Jkeweth his Handy Works-, the inani- mate Creation offer Occafion to thinking Beings topraife God : Now tho' the Glory cf God be differently cxpreis'd according to their feveral Ranks of Exifcence, yet it is the fame prin- cipal Defign that God lrath in all, namely his declarative Glory; and it is the fame thing that is manifeffed by all, tho' in a different Manner, viz. The Honour of the di- vine Attributes, and indeed herein the unfearchable Riches, and Objections mfwcred* 47 .and magnificence of divine Wifdom and Power are illuftriou£- \y difplay'd, in conducting the various Orders of Beings within the vail Circle of the fpacious Univerfe to one fu- pream uniform End, worthy of his Councils ! Now if Gods declarative Glory be his higheft End, in the Creation of all, as both Scripture and Reafon demon- ftate, then it muft be the Creatures laft End too, otherwife thefe Abfurdities will inevitably follow, viz. ift. That God will mifs his End, which would deftroy the divine Felicity, and fo is Blafphemous ! And 2d. It wou'd be the Creatures Duty is plainly this, That fuch was his Regard to the Glory of God, that he would choofe Death rather than the Heathen Nations mould infnlt the Almighty, and behave themfelves proudly againft him, upon the Qccafion of his deftroying the People in the Wildernefs y which he forefaw they would be apt to do,., and therefore plead that Ifrael might be fpared, (See Num* xiv. 13 to the iy) much after the fame manner God him- felf expreffes his own Regard to his Glory. [Dent, xxxii. 26, 27.) As to the Inftance of Paul, I mall crave leave to cite the Words of Mr. Matthew Hejiery upon it j which arc thefe, " I could wifi y lie doth not fay I do wijh } for it was G no ^c. Objections anfivered, but if it were, " I could wifh that 1 my f elf were accurfedfrom Chrifi T for " my Brethren -, a very high pang of Zeal and Affection for * c his Countrymen, he would be willing to undergo the grea- , Ludovicus dediufiaivin, Menochius -, yet it fhews a greatLove - r what a rlefhly Love ? No, the Chapter will inform us, that it was Love to their Souls, and a defire after their Happinefs,, and confequently he had an Eye to God's Glory, which is thereby manifested ! The Reafon orYer'd to confirm the Objection, viz. That by fuffering thofe Things God could not be Glorify d, &c, is anfwered by eonfidering,. that the deiires of thofe holy Men were not abfolute and peremtory, but. Hypothetical or Conditional, viz> that rather than God's Glory iLcuid be eclips'd, they were willing to endure thofe Things, if they were appointed Means to obtain fuch art. End. To fuppofe that their Love was wholly Carnal, is to confront the Context of the Places whence the aforelaid In- fiances are borrow'd, and pafs an uncharitable Cenfure upon. thofe Worthy's, as tho' they were Perlons of the moil fordid. Difpofition and Character I Obj 9. Afaph aclcd chiefly from filffh Principles, in Religion, as appears from Pjal ixxiii. 12. 13. 14. Behold thefe are the ungoldly who profper in the World. Verily I have cleanied niyHeait in vain, and waihed my Hands in Lmocency Objections anfwered. $u Innocency, for all the Day long have I been plaug'd and chaflned every morning. Anjwer, Ajaph only tells us of a paft Temptation, what a poling Difficulty it had been to him, to confider how that the Godly had generally the hardeft Lot, as to worldly Com- forts : This [arcanum or) fecret of divine Providence, had io exercis'd him, that he, thro' the Corruptions of his Na- ture and Temptations of the Devil, was like to have enter- tain'd hard and unbecoming Tho'ts of Religion ; nay it ap- pears that he had been guilty of this in fome degree, for his Feet were almojl gone ! But in his more compofed frame, he reflected upon the corrupt influences of thofe Temptations with abhorrence ! He calls himielf a Fool and a Beajl on that Account (as well he might) ver. 22. So joolijh was land ignorant \ I was as a Beajl before thee. In a time of vi- olent Temptation, he was drove to be pretty much of the felnfh Opinion I am oppofing, viz. to think it was a poor Thing only to ferve and glorify God, except it was attended with other Advantages ; but afterwards when he grew more calm, and got out of the violence of Temptation, he calls himielf a Fool, an Ignoramus, and a Beajl ( or as the Word is interpreted a great Bea ft) for it ; and acknowledges, that fuch Speeches, would be an Offence againjl the Generation of God's Children. See ver. 15. Object. 1 o. It was PauPs Sentiment, that the chief if not the only Motive to Obedie?ice, was the hope of eternal Life ', for if the Dead arife not to receive their Reward, let us eat and drink, walk in the Way of our own Heart, and in the Sight of our own Eyes, and give a loofe to all our Defires ! If in this Life only we have hope, we are of all Men moil; mhe- 1 able; what advantageth it me, that I have fought with Beafts at Ephefus, if the Dead arife not, G 2 A?ifwer 5 2, Objections anfwered. Anfwer^ The aforefaidPaffage of the Apoftle Paul's Wri- tings (i Cor. xv.) are foreign to the labouring Argument; for what he fays in them, is upon the Suppofition of no fu- ture State at all after this Life ; and upon the Suppofition of the confequent Falfehood of the Doctrines of the Golpel, (ver. 14. 1 c r & feq.) Upon this Hypothecs he obferves, that the Chriftians of that age were indeed the moft mifer- able of Mankind, to expofe themlelves to fuch heavy Perfecution for nothing, for an imporlure. Whereas in this Argument, we com'ider a future State as moft certain and the Doctrines of the Gofpel as moil: true and worthy of all Acceptation ; and that there is an infeparable connection be- tween believing Obedience in this Life, and complcat Hap- pinefs in the Life to come : And fo the Qiieftion is, which ought to be the chief and laft End of our Obedience, the Glory of God, or the obtaining our own Happinefs meerly conlider'd as fuch, without any reflect to the Glory of God, or eternal glorifying of him in Heaven ? Now if the aforeflud Expreffions of the Apoftle Paul, be fuppofed to favour the latter of thefe Opinions, they muff, be taken in the following Senfe, viz. That were his Obedience to God nothing concern'd, with his future Happinefs -, but that he could be fav'd without Holinefs, as well as with it, that then he would be at no pains, or care to ferve God at all ; but on the contrary give a loofe to all his vitious Incli- nations. But by this Senfe of the Words, theObjeetor makes (in his Opinion) the Apoftle Paul, to be a Hypocrite, and an Epi- cure ; for hereby it's neceffarily fuppos'd, that he had no Su- pernatural Principles ot Action, fuch as divine Life, Love, Holinefs ; but that on the contrary he had a iuperior Incli- nation to live after the Flefh, but wasreftrain'd from acting accord in Objections anfwered, 53 according thereto, meerly by the external Confideration of Advantages, to be had by it in the next State J Befides the bleffed Apoflle is condemned, as an "Epicure by the Objector ; what has been already fa id gives Weight to this, to which I may add, that of afcribing the Epicuresr proverb to him as his fix'd Judgment, only that he was divert- ed from acting accordingly by feliim Coufiderations. The Proverb that was veryFamiliar among thcEpicurians, was this. " Lude, hibas, come das, poft mortem nulla voluptas. i. e. play, V eat, drink, for after Death there is no Pleafurej" and that of Martial. " Vita nimis [era eft, craft ina vive Ho die. Life to-morrow is too late, live to day. Now the Apoflle Paul ufed the aforefaid Epicurian Pro- verb, namely, let us eat and drink, &a with a defign to confute it, as appears from the 33 and 34 verfes of the Chapter. PoiTibiy the Force of his Reafonings may be car- ried thus far, viz. that fuppofing the Dead rife not, the E- picuria?i Notion would be then more tolerable : But to fup- pofe that he fpoke abfolutely here, is, in other Words, to fay, that he believed there was no intrinfick Excellency in Hc- lineis, or Comforts attending the fincere Practice of it in this Life, but that it was only eligible, becaufe of the Advan- tages enkiing upon it, in a future State. And is not this the Sentiment of a felfifh fordid Soul ? But the Apoflle ap- pears to be a Perfon of a very different Character by his Wri- tings. See Rom. 6. 2. Howjhallwe (i.e. ho w can we) who we dead to Sin, live any longer therein ? Thofe that are Re- generated have an inward fix'd Principle, termed in Scrip- ture, the Seed of God, which creates a habitual Averfion a- gainfl Sin, and propeniity to Hoiinefs I Obj, 1 1 . Self Love is the Foundation of all the Love, we ©we or pay to God, what God is in hi mf elf we know not : The onh 54* Objections anfwered. only thing to determhie our defre, love, and fear of God, is his Attributes, as manifefted to us in Creation, Protection and Redemption; its nothing to the Purpofe to tell how lovely a?id ex- cellent God is in himfelf, abfolutely conjidered ; for tho y we con- Jider him as cloth 'd with all pofjible Perfections, without hav- ing to do with us, it will only raife our Admiration ; if we con- fider him as able and willing to make us happy, this will raife De/ire; if we confider him as jufl and powerful, and are un- der Apprehenfons that he will punijh us, this raifes Fear ; if realy punifhed by him, without hopes of releafe, this rai- fes Averfion, &c. if we confider him as good and merciful, and we are realy pojfefs'd oj it, this raifes Love, i "Joh. iv. 1 q. We love him becaufe he firfl loved us. Anfwer, The falfehood of the Poiition, contain'd in thea- tove Objection, will appear by the following Considerations, viz. 1 ft, Then we owe no love to God becaufe of his erlen- tial Excellency, which is abfurd j for what is infinitely a- miable is a proper Object of Love, and becaufe it deferves it, it therefore demands in Reafon and Juftice our fupream Affection. 2dly, The aforeiaid Poiition, deftroys entirely the neceflity of fupernatural Principles of Action, infus'd by Regeneration ; for if we muft love only for Benefits receiv'd, and not for the fake of the Giver confidcred abstractly, than there is no need of any thing but Nature, to excite to this. The Pagans who had nothing but natures Light to direct them, taught and practifed this. Lycurgus the Lacedemonian Law-giver, would make no law againft Ingratitude, becaufe -as he obferv'd, It was a prodigious Impiety, ?jot to repay a Benefit : And Seneca, in his Book de Benifciis, fays, Not to return one good Office for another, is inhuman ; but to return evil for Good, is diabolical, p. 104. and in p. 54. 5. 6. he lays, all benefits muft be gratuitous, a Merchant, fays he, fells me Corn, that keeps me and my Family from farving, hut he fold Objections anfwered* ^„ fold it for his Interefl^ as well as I bought it for mine, and fo I owe him nothing for it. This r fays he, is more properly the driving of a Trade, then the cultivating of a generous Com- merce j thus far he. Now tho' I believe that we may eye our own Happinefs, in our religious. Service, yet when we do this, above the divine Glory, it comes under Seneca's lam, and is folidly confuted by him in the preceeding Lines. 3dly. The aforefaid Pofition, juftifies the Devils, and damned's hating God, for they are pun ifhed by God, with- out Hopes of releafe, and therefore may have an Averfion to him, according to the preceeding Objection. And farther if we are to love him only becaufe of the Love he expreffes to us, then when he punifhes us, tho' moll juftly for our Often- ees, and therewith deprives us of all hopes of Mercy, wc may hate him Law-fully, (for there is no Medium between love and hatred) that is, we may hate infinite Holinefs, Juflice and Excellency, which is abfurd L 4. If we are bound to love God only, becaufe of the Be- nefits we receive or hope for from him, then we are not bound to love him at all j for the Refpecl we offer to him is not for himfelf, but for the Benefits we receive, and thus true Love to God, which is the Fulfilment of the Law, and Scope of theGofpel, is deftroy'd entirely by this Notion. For accord- ing to it, our Love ought to be wholly center'd upon the Benefits we receive for our own fake, and fo upon ourfelves : Even Seneca, the Pagan Stoick, could fay 3 this for that, is rather a truck than a Benefit. 5. The aforefaid Pofition deftroy's the Creators Right to the Creatures Love and Obedience,, when he does not per- ceive them to be profitable to himfelf and therefore if a Per- fcn in defpair, mould hate God, even in this Life, he is jufti- £ed by the aforefaid Pofition in fo doing. But, &,. The §6. Objections anfhvered".. 6. The aforcfaid Objection is inconfiftent with itfelf* for while it allows, that a view of the divine Perfections, with- out any Relation to our Benefit, may caufe Admiration, this Oppofes the other Part of it, for what is Admiration, but a high degree of Efleem, and is not this the Foundation of all rational Love ? y. The aforefaid Pofition contradicts the Experience of true Believers, who even in the dark Hours of Deflertion, when they think they are forlaken of and hated by God, yet thro' that inward Principle of divine Life which is in- fus'd into them by Converfion ; feel workings of Defire in them after God, and Love to him : Jonah was an Inftance of this, Jon. 2. A^.Then Ifaid, law cajloffout of thy Sight, yet will I look again towards thy holy Temple. When AJaph fear'd that God had forgotten him, and that hisMercy was clean gone from him, yet he wou'd acknowledge his infirmity, remember God, meditate upon his Works, and talk of his wondrous Doings j and yob in his Diftrefs profefs'd,. that thd" God Jhould Jlay him, yet he would truft in him, 8. The aforefaid Pofition denxoys the Reafonablenefs of" loveing our Enemies of ' blejjing them that cnrfe us and doing good to thofe that defpitefuily life us\ For if Self-Love, be the Foundation of all the Love we owe or pay to God, then it follows unavoidably that it is more fo of ail the Love we owe or pay to Man, than the hating thofe that hate us, and curling thofe that curfe us, &c. is in itfelf Rcafonablej for there is no felfifh Motive if we confider thofe Things fimply to ex- cite us to do otherwife. But does not this Notion exprefly contradict the Gofpel ofCmusT as well as the true Inter- efts of Society, and juftify the dreadful Pagan Principle of batin? car Enemies ! ^ T ••11 And as for the Text cited in the Objection, it will not bear the weight that is laid upon it, for it fays not, that the Saints Objections anfwered. §j Saints of old, lov'd God either only or chiefly, for his love to them, and yet this is the thing in Queftion ; the Tenden- cy of the aforefaid Objection is to fap the Foundations of the ■whole Go/pel, and to put natural Religion or Deifm in the Room of it. Obj. 12. The Difference between Hypocrify and Sincerity may be known according to the Scheme of making Man's Jub- fecJive Happi fiefs his lafi End thus, i . From their Works ; Hypocrites do all to be fecn of Men, and confequcntly have nothing, but outward Performances, but the fine ere Chriflian, Glorifies God in Thought as well as in Word -and ABion. Anf. This Proportion is indefinite and fo equivalent to a univerfal, it is as much as to fay : every Hypocrite does as aforefaid. And this is not true in fact j we have no Rea- fon to believe thatPtf^/beforeConverfion did all to be fecn of Men I Beiides if the Proportion were true, it would then follow by the Law of contraries, that every one that had, or hath good Thoughts and Refolutions, which are Acts of the Mind and Will, or any Defires after his own Salvation, muff be a fincere Chriftian : By this rule, Abi- meleck the Pagan, Balam the Wizard, Saul the Tyrant, Simon the Sorceror, and fudas the Traytor are dub'd for good Men ! But a 2. Sign of Sincerity that is offer'd is this, 4 ' The Hypocrite doth it to obtain a corruptible Crown, "" but the Sincere an incorruptible." Anf. Both the aforefaid Signs are the fame, for both reipeet the End of Action, & both refpect a temporal Reward ; tho' there be iome Difference in Specie, yet the Genus or Kind is the fame : What view to Honour or worldly In- tereit, had the foolim Virgins or thole gracelefs Jews, whom the Apoftle Paul fpeaks of {Rom. x. ) who had a Zeal, but not according to Knohvedge ? But pray obferve and fee if the Objector, does not prove himfelf to be a Hy- II pocrite 58 Practical Inferences. pocrite by his own Signs ! Thus ; If he be a Hypocrite, who makes the Intereft of the lower part of Self , the Body, in this World his chief End ; will it not follow, that he is alfo a Hypocrite, who makes the Interefts of the higher Part of felf, viz. the Soul, (without regard to God's Glory) in the next World his chief End ? Are they not both built on the fame Foundation of immoderate Self-Love} all theDifference between them is this, that the nrft refpec~f s the lower Part of Self, and fo is more grofs ; and the Latter the higher Part of Self, and fo is more fubtil and plaufible ; but is there any more Love to God for himfelf, in the one than in the other ? But I proceed to the Improvement of this Subject. And 1 . Methinks what has been faid, ferves to inform us of the Difficulty of Religion 3 and of the great Danger we are in of being deceiv'd, as to our State and Condition to- wards God . Surely Jlr ait is the Gate, and narrow is the Way, that leads to Life and few there be that find it, there is a Generation that are pure in their own Eyes and yet are not cleanfed from their Filthinefs ! 2. From what has been faid we may learn, the abfolute Neceflity of the New Birth, in order to ferve God accept- ably here, and enjoy him hereafter ! For without a Princi- ple above nature, we cannot aim at Goi above our felves. A Fountain may fend out Water upon a Level with it felf, but not above the Level ; and thus all that is done by us, while in a State of Nature, being done chiefly upon our own Account j it is but (infomeSenfe) a ferving ofourfelves, and therefore cannot be acceptable to God ; and hence the Apoftle afferts that he that is in the Fief cannot pleafe God. The Church of England in their Articles of Faith, juflly fry, -|r-^HE Apoftle having In the proceeding Verfes informed 1 Timothy of the Apoftacy of many from the Truth,, -M- and exhorted him to conflancy in cleaving thereto, in the Face of all Oppofition ; does in the Words be- fore us, as a Mean and Motive, propofe an ample Comme?ida- tion of the. Holy Scriptures, in which we may obferve^ thefe Particulars, 1 ft. The Subject commended, all Scripture, (pa fa graph e) i. e. all the Holy Scripture, not only the Old but the New Teftanient, in all their Parts.. The Word Scripture figni- fies Writing. And 2d. We have the Commendation, which rcprefents three Things, viz, the original, ufe, and defgn, of the Scriptures, And 1 ft. The Original, ifs given by Infpiration (tkeo fncuflos) i. e. by the immediate and infallible guidance of . the Holy Spirit, 2. Pet. i. 20, 21. Knowing this fir jl y that 710 Prophefy of Scripture is of any private Interpretation^ for - 62. The manifold life of the Scriptures defer itid. the Prophefy came not in old Time fry the Will of Man, but Holy Men oj old, fpake as they were moved to it by the Hc/y Ghvft. 2d. The life of the Koly Scriptures, they are profit able y (ophilemos) which does not only fignify, a certain Conveni- ency, as fome imagine, but their Neceffity, Sufficiency and PerjecTion I Here a fourfold profitablenefs of the Scriptures is mention'd, viz. iff. For Doctrine, (pros didafcalian) i. e. as Mr. Pool obferves in his Synopfis, jor Infru&ion in the fund Truths of the Chriftian Religion. The Original Word is derived from a Verb, that iignin* es to teach ; this Senie of the Word is conhrm'dRom. xv. 4. F.r whatfocver "Things were written aforetime, were written for cur Learning, that we thro' Patience and Comfort of the Scriptures might have Hope ! Here obferve, that the firft Ufe of the facred Scriptures, is to infrruct : And the firft Duty of thofe who Minifter in Holy Things, is to Teach, and afterwards to Exhort. And thus we may fee, that every Religion that Is not grounded upon Knowledge, is a falfe Religion ! And that, all fuch who would work upon Men's Paflions, and exhort them before they inftrnct their Minds, act contrary to the holy Scriptures, and to right Reafon ! Such do but delude Mankind, and build a Babel of Confufion, but God is a God of Order, and not of Confufion ! But 2dly, the Scriptures are proffi table for reproof, (pros elenchon) i.e. to convince and confute Hereticks, and refel their Errors. This Word rcfpecTs the polemical U'e of the Scriptures, to convince gain-layers and flop their Mouths, Tit. i. 9, 1 1. Helling ff the faithful Word as lc hath been taught, that he may be able by found Doc- trine both to exhort and convince the Gain- fivers, whofe mouths mujl be jlcp'd.— Here the Word Convince it, the fame in the Ori- ginal, with that in the Text which is tranfkted Reproof, add hereto, that a Principal ufe of the Scriptures, is to convince The manifold Ufe of the Scriptures defer ib'd. 63. of Shi, of ' Right eonfnefi and 'of Judgment, Joh.'xvi. 8. 9. The original Word translated Reprove, is the very fame with that in our Text, and fignifies to convince demonstratively : Now altho' the holy Spirit is the efficient Caufe of this, with- out whofe energy the Word has no Influence upon Mens Minds, yet the Scriptures are the Instrumental Caufe, for by the j^aw is the Knowledge of Sin. Now that the Reproof in the xvi. of John's Gofpel, before mention'd, refpects not only evil Actions, but a State of Sin, appears from thefe Words of our Lord in the 9th ver. of ^ Sin, be caufe ye have not believe don me. 3dly, For Correction, (profs epanorthofm) Correction pre- fuppofes Evil, and feeing that this is Two-fold, viz. either of Sin or Puni foment, therefore Correction is alio two-fold : By the one we are freed from the Evil of Sin, which is call'd Rcprehenjion ; and by the other from the Evil of Sorrow, which is call'd Conflation, Both thefe the original Word (epanor- thofs) includes. 4thly, For Infruclion in Right eoufnefs, (profs paidei an eli- te dicaiofune) the Word (paideia) fignifies both Instruction and Diredion. The word Righteoufnefs, every moral Good. This Phrafefeems to import the exhortatory Ufe of the holy Scriptures, thole who have begun Well, the holy Scriptures both direct and exhort to perfift in their pious Courfe ; and therefore in thefe four Ufes all the Bufmefs of the Scriptures is defcrib'd. But 3 dly, we have in thefe Words the End and Scope of the Scriptures, and that is, that the Man of God may be perjeSf, and thoroughly f unified. Who are we to under- Hand by the Man of God} Anfwer, In general all pious People ; but efpecially Mini- sters, of the Gofpel. The Word perfect (Artios) is explain'd by the following Sentence, the holy Scriptures give Efficient Direction 64« Arguments to prove the Divine Direction for all .Goodnefs of every kind, that may be call'd Perfecl, which has all its Parts. It is the manner of the Hebrews to ufe many Words in exprefiing that which they have a mind to imprefs on their Readers ! In difcourfing upon this Text of Scripture, I mall accord- ing to the Order of it, I. Labour to prove the divine Original of the hoh Scrip- tures. And, II. Speak of their Ufe. The i ft. General Head ofDifcourfe, is the divine Original of the Scriptures, or to prove that they have been given port h by divine Infpiration, and are therefore infallibly true, and of divine Authority. To this End let it be confidered, i ft. That a divine Revelation is neceftary, feeing that na- ture teaches that there is a God, or feme firft Being, from whom are all things as their firft Principle, and to whom all things tend, as their laft End, and who is therefore above all. It is but reafonable that this fupream Being, mould be worfhiped if he is above all, more excellent than all, and we have received our All from him, (as it is incon- teftibly evident j) then thefe Things mould be acknowledged with due Reverence, and what is this but the Worfhip of God ? Surely he from whom our Beings and all our Benefits do proceed, has a juft Right to our Homage and Service. And feeing he has made rational Creatures, to fome fort, capable of it, is it not reafonable to conclude, that the fu- pream Being, who always ads with the wifeft Defign, does and will require that moral Service for which he has given a Capacity ? the Cafe muft be fo, otherwife the Almighty has given a Capacity to no Purpofe, which is unworthy of his infinite Wifdom ! Well, feeing the Almighty does require fome Worfhip and Service of his reafonable Creature o ; may we not infer from Autljorily of the Scriptures, 65 from his Infinite Goodnefs, that he has given them fome certain and infallible rule, to direct them therein - y efpecial- ly confidering, that there are fome things in Religion, which cannot be known by the Light of Nature, viz. all thofe In- stitutions which Spring from the meer Wilier good Fleafurc of God, cannot be found out by the force of human Reafon- ing, without fome fpecial Revelation from God. As Jeho- vah makes Lis unatainted Purity manifeft in moral Laws, fo the Glory of his Sovereignty appears in hispofitive Injuncti- ons, relpecring which his Pleafure ccu'd not be known with- out fome divine Revelation. And thus all that tribute of Ho- nour, which redounds to his Sovereignity thereby, would be entirely loft ; from all which Confiderations, the necefhty of fome Supernatural Revelation, fome divine Law to direct Mankind in the Affairs of Religion, is of the laft Neceflity. Neither, 2diy. Is it impoflible that the Almighty mould communicate his Mind and Will to his Creatures by imme- diate Revelation : If a Creature can impart his Mind to a- nother, much more the Creator ; for furely there is no excel- lency in Creatures, but what is eminently in him. If it is not inconfiflent with the Glory and Majefly of God to be- hold ami be prcfent with all Things^ then furely it cannot be injurious to his Honour to communicate his Mind to reason- able Creatures : Nay, on the contrary, it is an Indication of his Goodnefs and Wifdom, to favour intelligent Creatures with fiich intimations of his Will, as are fuitable to tire Ca- pacity he has given them, and fubfervient to promote their Hap pine is. Neither is it in any refpecl abiiird or impoflible for the Almighty to communicate his Mind to Mankind by imme- diate Revelation. Surely he that made the Soul can find eafie accefs to the Work of his own Hands, and form what Impref- fion-s on it he pleafes ! If a finite Spirit can communicate its I Idea? 66. Arguments to prove the droihe- Ideas to the Soul of Man, as all confefs, except Sadduces,. how much more can the Father of Spirits ? To deny the reality of Inspiration, is not only to reject the credibility of Scripture Hiftory, but to confront the avoved Sentiments of the Pagan World, who all declar'd it to be agreeable to Reafon ! Having premis'd thefe few particulars, I mall proceed to mention thole Characters of Divinity which are imprefs'd on the Scriptures. And i ft. Methinks the Antiquity of the Scriptures, is an Ar- gument of their divine Authority : The Books of Mofes (next to the Decalogue) are the moll ancient Writings in the World.. This Jufiin Martyr, who liv'd in the fecond Centuary, and Eufebius after him, make fully evident. But the Words of Tertulian, in his Apology, are very memorable ! " Our Reli- " gion, fays he, jar out does all that you can boajl of in that " Kind 5 fir the Books of one of our Prophets only, viz. Mofes, c: (wherein it feems God hath incks'd, as in a Treafury, all ** the Chrifian Religion preceeding fo many Ages together) " reach beyond the anticntejl you have ; even all your public k Mo- '" numents, the Antiquity of your Originals, the efiablijhment of • v vour E/iates, the Foundations of your Cities, all that are ad- u vanced by. you in all Ages of Hi/lory and Memory of Times. — and here it may be alTerted, that they were Men of fuch blamelefs Lives, that their Enemies could not fix fuch Charges upon them as might juftly weaken the Credit of their Writings, It is likewife evident, that they were Men of greatCandor and Integrity, and that from their difcovering their own Faults, Mofes Records his Backwardnefs to comply with the divine" Call ofgoing to Egypt, his Infidelity, his Murmurings, [Num. xi. 11, 15.) and Jeremy informs us, of his curling the Day of bis Birth, Jer. xx. David makes mention of his Crime in the Matter of Uriah, (PfaL li.) nay they do not only mention their own Crimes, but thofe of their deareft. Relations ; which carnal Policy would have inclin'd them to conceal ; thus Mofes mentions his Brother Aaron's making the Golden-Calf (Exod* xxxii 25.) They alio acquaint us, with the mean- efs of their Extraction, thus Amos tells us that he was a- mong the Herdfmen of Tekoah 5 the Evangelifts inform us- that they were Seafaring Men, when call'dto be Difciples. Neither were the Penmen of the Scriptures, defigning Men, they fought not their own Honour, as appears from what has been faid , neither did they feek their own Intereft. Altho' Mofes had the Burden of Government, yet he did not affect the pomp of a King, neither did he advance his Family to that Wealth and Honour which was in the Power of his Hand to confer ! No, the Laws he made, depriv'd his own Tribe of kingly Government, and the higheft Honour of the Priefthood he conferred on hisBrothersChildren r not his own! Its certain that Inftead of Honour and Profit, many of the Penmen of the Scriptures, expofed themfelves by their writ- ing and preaching to great Contempt and Hardships ! Befides many of the Penmen of the Scriptures, were of fuel* Inferior Abilities that they were not able to form an K Impofture., 74 Arguments to prove the divine Impoiturc and palm it on the World. And Tome of them werje Kings, and fb above the fneaking MeanefTes of Lying and Forgery ! And to conclude this Argument, I may far- ther obferve that the very Writers of the Scriptures appear to be under a Subjection to the Doctrines they delivered, which argues them to be of a divine Original ! But j. The exaB accomplijimient of Prophefies, proves the Di- vinity of the Scriptures; to foretel Events that depend up- on arbitrary Caufes, exceeds the reach of a human Mind, and is the Prerogative of that God only, who is panophthal- mos, all eye and has no Succeffion in Duration; but there are many Inftances of this kind in Scripture, e. g. MofeS and yof/.ua foretold the Idolatrous Apoflacy of Ifrael, {Dent. xxxi. 29. jfcf. xxiii 15.) which the Book of Judges fhews was accompliihed. Ifaiah and Jeremiah foretold the Babel- lonijh Captivity, with the Time of its Continuance, and the Deliverance from it by Cyrus, which accordingly came to pais, as other Parts of the Old-Teflament do witnefs. The Pro- phecy of a Reformation by Jofiah, and his burning the Bones of the Idolatrous Priefts at Bethel, did exactly come ; to pais three Hundred Years after. (1 Kin^sxm. 2. 2 Kings xxiii, 15, 16.) And many Propheiies reipecting the Time and Manner of our Saviour's coming, his Birth, Life, Mira- cles, and Death, are punctually fulfilled. It was near two Thouiand Years, before that famous Prophiiy, {Gen. xlix. 10.) had its Accomplimment, Hircanus was the laft of the Tribe of jtidah, who fway'd the Scepter of Government over the People of Ifrael, and this Man Herod a Stranger, an Idumean ilew ; and lb cut off the Line of Judah, and ufurp'd the Government, as Jofephus tcftifies ; and then did the Messias come. An ingenious Writer glolleth excellent- ly upon the aforefaid Prophecy, in the following Manner. The Jewifn Rabbins fayeth he, " do ?iot deny that by Shi- loh Authority nf the Scriptures, yr tc loh is meant the Messiah ; now at the "Time r/" Jacob's tc uttering the/e Words, there was little Probability that a- *' m of his PoJJerity Jlxuld have a Sceptre, — being poor, jew ^ cc and in a f range Land y or if they fhould thrive Jo as to be- ** come a Kingdom, why Jl.ould Judah have the Government^ " Seeing there were three elder Brothers, viz. Reuben, Si- ec meon, and Levi j nor was there any likelihood of this Pro- " pheefs being accompli Oj 'd when Moles fet it down in Writ-. " m g,r f or t' jcn h' s himfelfwho was of the Tribe of Levi was ff in the actual PofeJJion of the Government, and put into it tc by God himfclf, who appointed for hisfuccefor Joibua, not of " the Tribe of Judah, but i^/'Ephraim, whence we have a no- " table Evidence,, of the Truth and Sincerity of this Pre- " diSlion : Tor had not Jacob really uttered it, we cannot " imagine that Mofes would have put it in Writing, to the " Dijparagement of his own Tribe T Thus far he. We fee with our Eyes the ingathering of the Gentiles, andDifperiion of the Jews ! But the Time would Tail to relate the accomplishment of thofe numerous Propheiies that re_ ipeei. our Saviour: I mult, therefore proceed to obferve. 8. That God himfelf has attefted the Divinity of the Scriptures by Miraculous Works, and Rirely if we receive the Witnefs of Men, theWitnefs of God is greater.. A Mira- cle is an extraordinary divine Work, whereby fomething is produe'd contrary to the common Courfe and fixed Laws of Nature S Now that many fuch have been wrought by the Prophets, by Christ, and the Apoflles, for the Confirma- tion of the Divinity of their Miffion and Doctrine, we have all the Evidence that fuch pail Fads will admit of, and more cannot be reafonably defir'd. Elijah cxprcfly appcal'd to God for the Determination of the Controversy be- tween him and the Priefts of Baal, by a miraculous Work,and our Lord appeai'd to the Miraculous Works K 2. lie 76 Argunientsfa prime the diving he performed in Confirmation of his Million and Doctrine^ as particularly in the Cafe of John Baptifl's Difciples, go and tell him, fa id he, that the Blind receive their Sight, and the Lame walk, &c. We have Information by many credi- ble and difintereiled Witneflefs, that the Miracles which our Lord wrought, were many in Number, beneficent in Kind, that they were wrought before Multitudes of Enemies, who, had there been any fraud, would furely have detected it. They were wrought frequently in open Day, and of this the Relators were Eye and Ear Witneffes. A Miracle is certainly the broad Seal of Heaven, which could never be given to a forgery ! And therefore, as Dr. Owen obferves, " When am Do ft vine which is in itfelf Juch as be comet h Holi- *' fiefs and Right eoujhefs\ is confirm d by a Miracle, there can " no greater Affurance be given even by God him/elf of its and the Law is Holy, Jujl and Good. The Heretical Soci- jiians imagine alio, that the Religion of the New-Teflament, differs efTentially from that of the Old, and therefore that the Old is not necerTiry to be read. The enthuiiailical Mora- •■;■.'. mi do alio flight the Old-Tcitament, and do endeavour to invalidate all Arguments drawn from thence. On the Contrary the reform' d Churches, believe that the divine L 2 Authority S4 Arguments to prove the divine Authority of both Telfaments is the lame and that there- fore the Old is neceflary and profitable to be read as well as the New : Their Reafons are thefe, ill. * The Books of the * Old as well as the New are divinely inspired, this our Text ' confirms ; and therefore both are of infallible Truth and Au- 1 thority.. ' 2dly, Becaufe the Old as well as the New was given for a * Rule of Faith and Practice to theChurch, Pfa. cxlvii 19. 20, ' 3dly. We no where read in the New-Teftamcnt, that c theOId was aboliilfd. But 1 4thly, On the Contrary it is confirm'd by the Precept and 1 Practice of Christ. {Job. 5. 39. Luk, 24. 17.) He directs * us to the Old-Tellament, (Luk. xvi. 29.) and confuted his ■ Adversaries by it. [Mat. iv. 7.) And the fame was done by 6 the Apoftles Peter and Paul. (A:h iii. 20. Acts xviii. 28.) ' 5tb.lv, The whole Doctrine of the New, is contain'd in 6 the Old. The Apolfle Paul profefs'd, that he preach'd no- : thing befides what the Prophets and Mofes did lay mould * come. {Acts xxvi. 22.) The Beream were commended for * examining the Doctrine of the New by the Old, {Acfs * xvii. 11.) Ail the Prophets are laid to give Witnefs to Cliriit, 1 Luk. xxiv. 27. * 6thly, The Old Testament is faid to be the Foundation * of Faith, and of the Christian Church, {Epbef. ii. 20. 1 A#s xxiy. 14.) So that fuch as flight the Old-Tefbment, * endeavour to overthrow, the Foundation of the Chriliian 4 Religion : For the New is confirm'd by the Old, and is a * Fulfilment of the prophetical and typical Part of it.' I proceed to a Word of Improvement. If the Scriptures be of divine Authority, then let us love them with- a fincere JLove from the Heart, with a fuferlaUve Love above any Thing elfe, they mould be fweeter to our Tafle than Honey from the Comb, and more precious than Gold, with a con- jlant Authority of the Scriptures. 85 Rant Love, as it happens in Hunger and Thirfl. (Pfa. i. 2.) with a univerfal Love extending it felf to the Law and its Threats, as well as to the Gofpel and its Promifes, the Pfal- mi/l glory'd in this, O bow love I thy Law, it is my Me- ditation all the Ddy» Our Love, mould be effectual exciting us to gratitude to God for fo excellent a benefit, which we mould expreis with Words and Actions. Let us fear the threatnings,- and if Gracious, depend upon the Promifes, and whatever our State be, let us conform to the Precepts of the divine Word ; if we have no Grace, this is the Way to obtain it, and if we have, to increafe it. Let us read the Scriptures with Care, and meditate frequently on them. We may be excited to, the aforefaid Love, by considering the Perfections of their Author, the Excellency of the Doctrines contain'd in. them, with their Tendency and manifold Ufe, They are the Wifdom and Power of God to Salvation. All Scripture is given by hfpiration of God, and is profit- able for DoBrine, for Reproof, for Correclion, for InfirucJion in Righteoujhefs, that the Man of God may be perfeel, tho- roughly fur nijhed unto all good Works. SERMON 86 The divine Exigence SERMON IIIL PSALM xiv. i. The Fool hath /aid in his Heart there is no God. HE Knowledge of the divine Exigence is the Foun- dation of all Religion, without this we cannot come to God,~tind fir c-rely feek his Favour ; where- fore it appears by the Law of Contraries, that the denial of a Supream Being muft needs be the fatal Source of all Impiety and Perfidy. And this die Pfalmift confirms Pfalm 10. 4. The Wicked through the Pride of his Coun- tenance will not feek after God : God is not in all his Thoughts. The Evidences of a fupream Being, are fo many and ma- nifest, that it muft needs be an Inflance of the greateft fol- ly and impiety to call it in Queftion : And yet this our Text informs us is the Practice of fome, whofe Character and Courfe we have therein a Defcription of, the Fool. This ignominious Epithet or Character is frequently and juftly ai- figned to wicked Men in Scripture ; for the Contraries of true Wifdom realy belong to them, as appears thus, Wif- dom directs to an End in the full Enjoyment of which we are compleatly Happy, as well as to Means that directly 1 2nd thereto, and excites to the Improvement of the afbre- faid Means in their proper Seafon j whereas ungodly Perfons either propofe to themfelves an End which cannot yield complcat Satisfaction, namely fome earthly Entertainment; or Prov'd and improv'd. 8? or if they propofe the Enjoyment of God in a future World as their End; they purfue contrary Meafures to attain it, 'viz. Sin and Impiety, and poftpone the earned Ufe of pro- per Means to fecure an Inteteft in the divine favour, until the golden Seafons of divine Grace are el ajp feJ, It is cer- tainly a property of true Wiidom, to exert principal Care and Labour to fecure the moft valuable and enduring Good, and to avert the greateft Evil : Whereas impenitent TranfgrerTors on the Contrary, bend their principal Labour and Solicitude in quell: of Trifles, which are of no Importance and Dura- . tion ; while in the mean Time they are fiipinely and pro- fufely Negligent of immence and immortal Good, and there- by expofe themfelves to interminable ft Tilery, and intolerable Vengeance ! But this methinks is one of the moft aftonifhing Inftances of the folly of Impenitents, which our Text records, namely, their qucftioning the Exiftenceofa fupream Being, the Fool hath jaid in his Heart : • This Exprefiion Teems to denote rather a Delire that there was no God, than a Be- lief that there is none. When Perfons go on in a courfe of crimfon Impiety, as it is laid of the Fool in our Text, they are corrupt ^ they have done abominable M r orks. Then they are difpofed to Queftion the Exiftence of an aveng- ing Judge, that fo they may Sin without Controul or Re- luctance : Doubtlefs fome refactory TranfgrerTors incerTanily labour entirely to extinguifh the native Notices of a fupream Being in their Minds, that fo they may give a lawlefs un- bounded loofe to their fenfitlve Appetites, without the un- eafy allay of a future Judgment. In diicourfing on this Text I purpofe ill. To prove the Being of a God by fome Arguments. And II. To expofe the Atheifts folly in ^uejlioning it. And i ft. Methinks the Subordination of Caufes which we behold, and their Succeilion, manifeftly point to a firft Cau/e 88 The Divine Ext ' [fence j Caufe; there hath been for fome franding of Time, and there yet is, a fucceflion of Creatures in the World : Now thefe Creatures trannot make themfelves., for that which is not, cannot act : Nothing cannot be the Caufe of fomething. To fuppofe a Cre^ure could produce itfelf, involves a mani- fell Abiurdity in it, viz. That it is, and is not at the fame Time, and that it acts before it exifts, which is impomble : As it produces it mult be, for nothing cannot act ; and as it is produe'd, it mult, not be, and as thefe Creatures cannot make themfelves, fo neither can they make each other, for this Reafon, becaufe to create Something out of Nothing, is a Work that requires infinite Strength, (the diftance be- tween nothing and fomething being infinite) Now no Crea- ture hath this Property of Almightynefs, therefore it cannot act contrary to the fixed Laws of Nature in Creating : All that a Creature can do is only, in a natural Way, to give particular Forms to fit Materials, but the Matter itfelf he cannot produce. If the Creature could make himfelf, then it would follow, by a parity of Reafon, that he could preferve himfelf, for the latter is no greater than the former. But manifold Experience proves the latter to be falfe, and there- fore the former is fo from which this proceeds. But farther, upon the fuppofition of the Creatures making himfelf snd- others, it may be enquir'd, why he has made himfelf and thofe of the fame Species, lb Indigent and De- pendant on other Creatures for Support ? Likewife how it comes to pafs that he knows fo little of himlelf and others? Surely he that makes Things mufr needs Understand them : From all which it appears, that Man could not make him- lelf and other Creatures. But to bring tin's Argument reipecling the Succefiion of Creatures, to a Crifis, it may be obferv'd, that one or other of Proved and improved. 8(j. of the k four Particulars refpecting it will hold good viz. Either that the Succeflion is Infinite, or that the fame Thing produces it felf, or that there is a Circulation of Caufes, viz. That A fhould be the Caufe of B, B of C, C of A and D of A again, or fome firft Being who proceeds from none, whom we call GOD, there is not a fifth. Now the Three firft Particulars cannot be admitted without Contradiction, as for Example, an infinite Subordination or Succeflion of Caufes, i ft. infers that while that continues nothing can ex- iff, than which nothing can be more falfe: Now the Juftnefs of the aforelaid Confequence appears thus, viz. nothing can exift except by its next • Caufe, which produces the Effect ; But if an infinite Number of Caufes mull preceed the next Caufe, that next Caufe would never exift, for there is no end to Infinity, and then it would follow, that there- fore nothing now exifts, which is abfurd, and then 2dly That which is infinite would be rendered more, inafmuch as to the fuppofed infinity of Caufes we fee daily new ones added, and thus there would be an infinite which was not Infinite, which is abfurd; and further 3 would be the Caufe of him- felf If the Atheift againft the aforefaid Reafonings objects, that we do not fee the Sun, Moon, and Stars to be produ- ced by others,, to this it may be reply'd, that altho' we per- ceive not by our Senfes that thofe have been produced, ne- verthelefs by reafon we may certainly infer this, and that from the following Topick, viz.. We obferve all thefe Things to be finite, and feeing that nothing can limit itfdf and its own Perfection, it is neceffary that it fhould derive its Being and Limitations therein from another, But more- j)articularly, A 2d. Argument to prove the Being of God is this, viz v The World is created, therefore God exifts : Here we fup- pofe what no Atheift will deny, viz. That the World ex- ifts, well then this World that now exifts has either pro- duced itfelf, or has been from Eternity, not produced or is* produced by another, and that either of fomewhat pre-ex~ ifting, or of Nothing : If the latter holds,, it is created,, for Creation is but a Production of Something out of No- thing. Now to enforce this Argument let us briefly confider its Parts, and 1. that theWorld did not produce it felf appears from what has been before obferved : For then it would be and not be at the fame Time, which is impofiible from the Nature of Things. And 2dly that it did not exift from E- temity, the following Particulars demonftrate 1 ft. Eternity is an Infinity, which a finite World is unca- pable of: If the Atheift affirms theWorld to be infinite, he may be eafily confuted from the Parts of the World, which are either infinite or finite ; if they be laid to be infinite, then PrcrSd mid improved, 9 r \ then there are many Infinites and by Confequece none, which is abfurd j each Part would have all the Perfection, of the Parts joyned with it, or not: If yea, then they would not be different, but one and the fame, which our Eyes be- holding the Parts of the World prove to be falfe, if nay, then it would not be infinite, but finite, and if the Parts of the World, be finite how can it felf be infinite, can finite Caufes produce an infinite Effect ? No furely ! that is contrary to- the Nature and Reafon of Things. 2. If the World exifted from Eternity, then an infinite- Number of Years, which Eternity implies, muff neceffarily have preceeded this Day, and feeing that Number could ne- ver have been compleat, by confequence this Day could ne- ver fucceed, but we fee it does fiicceed ; And 3. From the Supposition of the Worlds Eternity it would fol- low, that Jomething can be added to what is infinite, & there- fore that there is an infinite which is not infinite, which is Ridiculous] For is not Eternity an infinite Duration, and yet according to the aforefaid Hypothefis, Years, Months and Days are added to it ; from which it follows, that infi- nite can be more than infinite, inafmuch as the World which was before one Thoufand Years agone infinite in Duration, is now older, therefore it cannot be that the World mould exifr. from Eternity. 4. The Corruptibility of the Parts of the World, proves that it is not eternal, for what exifts externally exifts of it felf, and fo exifts neceffarily, and thus is not liable to Corrup- tion. That which borrows its Being of no other needs not & fo depends not upon any other for the Continuation of its ex- iftence, for that no other can deftroy. But we fee the Cafe is contrarywife with the Parts of the World , and therefore it is not eternal. It mujl neceffarily be acknowledged fays M'2 " Lucretius. ^2 The divine Exiftence, " Lucretius, that the World had a Beginning, other wife thofe " Things which are in their own Nature corruptible, had nc~ " ver been able from all Eternit)\ to have held out againjl " thofe forcible and violent Afaults, which in an ijifinitc Du- " ration mujl have happened." I add, without the fuperintend- ance of an Almighty Being. 5. If the World was eternal, cc How comes it to pafs, fays " Lucretius, that the Poets fpeak of nothing before the Tro- " jan and Theban Wars?" Was there nothing memorable done in infinite Ages worthy to communicated to Poft.erity 3: or could they find no Ways in that vaft Space, to effecl: this till of late ? How improbable are thefe Things ? It is certain that divers profitable Inventions have been of late Years found out, iuch as Printing, the Gun, the Ver- tue of the Load/lone, and divers other Particulars; what mould be the Reafbn that no Genius in infinite Ages mould luckily hit upon thefe before, if the World was Eternal I Had not Men the fame Incitements to feek after fiich In- ventions before as now ? And to lay that Men of late Ages have more Wit than a fuppos'd infinite Number of Pre- deceffors, is too great and groundlels a Compliment upon the prefent Generation, and fome few that have preceed- ed it. But a 3d. Argument is this, The W f orld is prefcrved to this Day, therefore God exifts : For what is the Confervation of the World, but a continued Creation ? with this Difference only, that the one includes a newnefs of exiffing, which the other excludes. If the Atheifl fhould deny that the World is preferved, and fay, that it endures only, as we fay our God endures, without anothers Support : In anfwer to which we fay, that it endures indeed but by Prefervation, and that becaufe it was produced by another, as has been before proved ; And therefore the Difference between the Duration of PrarSd and improved. 95 of God and theWorld is very vail 5 God is limply of himfelf, and therefore the Firft, and fo an independant Being, who needs not, and cannot reeeive Support from any other : Whereas the World is from another, and therefore muft be preferved by him to whom it owes its Original. The World muft be either preferved by it felf or by another ; not by it felf, that which could not give to it felf a Being, cannot preferve the Being it has received from another ; and there- fore it muft be preferved by another, and who can this o- ther be, but he who gave it its Exiftence? But if it was any other Thing that without doubt would be a Fart of the World, and thus a Part would preferve the whole which is abfurd! Surely that which preferves a Fart muft needs preferve the whole ; moreover feeing there are in the World divers Parts which are not only of a different kind, but contrary to each other, fuch as Fire and Water, &c. which do con- tend againft one another with all their Strength, what could keep them from deftroying each other, but the Power of their Almighty Former r 1 A 4th. Argument for the Exiftence of a God may be drawn from the Government of the World. Here we prefuppofe what no Atheift will deny, viz. that the World confifts of various Parts, not only different but contrary, and many of them irrational, which neverthelefs harmonioufly concur to promote their own particular Perfection,, and the general Good of the whole Univerfe, and that without their De- lign, and contrary to their Nature, of Neceliity therefore they muft needs be governed, cither by thcmlelves or another, not by thcmlelves, for many of them want Rea- fon and cannot be their own Guides, thc-efore it muft be by another, and who is he that is fit for fuch a fpacious and important Province, but an omnipreient, omnicient, omni- potent f/4- ¥hc divine Exigence, potent and infinitely wife Being r When we behold the various Wheels of a Watch mutually helping on one Defign, by their contrary Motions which they know not, we preient- ly conclude, that fome Workman has been there, and has formed the Wheels and adjufted them to their proper Dii- tances, and by a Spring has put the Whole in Motion. If an Atheift mould lay, that the former Order refults from the peculiar Nature of the Parts, we mayeaiily reply and fay, but from whence is that Nature, Wifdom and Order ? When we behold the Harmony and Subferviency of the feveral Parts of the Creation to each other, we may juftly ufe the Pfaimi/i's Exclamation, and fay, How manifold are thy Work* O God, in Wifdom haft thou made them all 7 The Sun enlight- ens and warms the Earth, which elfe would be but a me- lancholy and barren Place. The pregnant Clouds ihed their balmy Dews and gentle Drops, which prepare the Earth to produce its Fruits, which would be mar'd if the Water defcended from the Clouds in Torrents, which it naturally tends to ! And what lefs than Omnipotence, can liipport thofe vail Cifterns of Water, I mean the Clouds, without a- ny Stronger Prop than the thin Air? Surely if they were left to their natural Gravity only, they would foon innundate the World with a fecond Deluge ! Dr. Bates obferves refpccling the Situation of the Sun, " 'That if it was nearer the Earth u it would fcorch its Surface by too near an Approach, and " if farther off] it would be opprefed by fitch a multiplicity of ; Horie, die Ox, &c. being ignorant of their Strength to refill:, are tame and eafily fubmit themfelves to the Rule of weaker Men. With what furprifing Sagacity does the Bird build her Neft, the Spider frame its Web, the Bee form its numerous Repertories to receive and pre- ferve the Sweets which with much Diligence he extracts from the opening Flowers ? With what prudent careful Pro- vidence, does the Ant lav up her Winter-Store before its approach ? And likewife the Squirrels, and yet thefe Crea- tures act without ReafoK or Defign, muft it not then necei- farily follow, that there is a divine Government. But methinks it It-ill illuftrates thisArgumenf, when we con- fider that the Wants of all Creatures are fuppiy'd: Creatures can no more provide for themfelves than they could make themfelves, and who is equal to this Task, but an all fuf- ficient infinite Being? If there was no Providence, how could this be effected ? And can there be aProvidence without a God ? Is it not owing to this all governing Providence, that the weaken: Schemes are fometimes crowned with Succefs, and the beft concerted prove abortive ? Is not the Wifdom of the Wife fometimes deJiroyed y and the Under/landing of the Prudent brought to nought t Surely the Race is not to the Swift r nor the Battle to the Strong ! Surely Promotion comes neither from 96 ¥7jc divine Exiftence, from the Haft, nor from the Weft, nor from the South ; hut God is t]>e Judge, he putteth dov:n one and fetteth up another ! How amazing is the Conduct of Providence, in implant- ing in all Animals, rational and irrational, a ' natural Care for the Proviiion of their Young Ones, which even the mod Savage fort do fiirpriilnglv manifefl ? and do they not ge- nerally bring forth their Young in the Spring ? A Seafon when they are mod likely to be provided with Food for their Support ! To what elfe than a divine Providence can we afcribe the Provision of the Bread, the Udder with its Milk for their Stidcnation ? with their natural Indincr. with- out Indrnciion, to feek Nourishment that Way? And it mould not be pafled over with Silence and Negligence, that thole Things which are abfoutely necefTary for the Support of Man's Life are common, and may be attained by the poorer Sort by Labour and Indudry, while curious Dainties, fit for the Support of Luxury, are codly and be- yond their Reach. Is it the Effect of Chance that fome of the Beads of the Field have Weapons for their Defence ? And that others have a natural Swiftnefs to Ay from Danger, and that there be Caverns provided for their Security ? Is it meer Chance that the Earth is feor'd with a variety of Medicines and Man endued with a Capacity to ufe them for his Cure ? If the Sea, as fome fay, be higher than the Earth, what is it that puts Boundaries to its proud Surges and prevents a fecond Inundation, but divine Providence ? And what but this keeps the Elements about us, and Humours within us in a due Temperature ? What but this that redrains the Wrath of our Enemies and preferves us from Ruin ? If Hurtful Infects were not deftoy'd by each other, or by the Cold Seafon of the Year, would not they by their Num- bers devour the Fruits of the Earth and deftroy us ? Now what Proifd and improved. 97 what can we afcribe this Prevention to, but a fuper- mtendant Providence ? 5. Another Argument for the divine Exigence may be drawn from the vifible Heavens, which do declare the Glory of God. With what inimitable Pomp and (lately Magnifi- cence does the azure Canopy fparkle forth its various and a- mazing Glories ! The Motion of the Heavenly Luminaries- is fo regular and fteady,. that an Aftronomer may tell for a Hundred Years to come their Eclipfes to a Minute ! But from whence does this Order this Law-proceed, but from- fome infinitely Wife and Almighty Legiflator ? 6. Another Argument may be deriv'd from both the Parts of the Compound Man. And 1 ft. From the Body. How curious and beautiful is its Structure ? Infinitely exceeding all Works of Art ! Sure!} we an fearfully and wonderfully made ! While the Brutal Herds have a prone and. grovelling Afpect, the Countenance of Man • is- ■ erect, to contemplate the Heavens, where his Creator has his chief Seat of .Residence ! To fignify as it were, where his chief delight fhould be fixt, and that he mould as much exceed the lower Creation in the noblencfs of his Sentiments and Affections,, as he does in the natural form of his Afpect ! This the Poet expreiles elegantly, Os homini Sublime dedit, cclumq tuerl^ fufit et ereclos, ad Sydera toller e vidtus. The furprifing variety of Features in the fmall compafs of the Face, where all the Parts are the fame,, maniiefls the in- finite Wifdom of the Architect! Without- this we cannot know each other : And thus all the fociai Offices on which human Happinefs depends, muft forever expire and termi- nate ! The rudeft Barbarities and Impieties muft eniue, and Men degenerate into a Herd of Beafts ! N. How o8 The Divine Exigence How excellent are all the Parts of the human Body fitted, by their Form and Situation for Beauty, and all the Ui'cs de- fign'd by an intelligent Mind ? The miiplacing of any Part, would make it as Monflrous as Ufeles! Ga/rnjuiWy obierved, cc That if a Per foil ftudied an hundred Yean to place any Part " of the human Body in a different Situation, that it could " fist be done without marring its Beauty ana Service" But there are fbme Parts of this Structure, which efpecialy chal- lenge our Admiration ! The Brain in its mazy Labyrinths, which is the Scat of the Nerves and ipping of Motion, can enough admire or fufficiently explain ! The Eye' with its various Coats, Humours and optick Nerve, by wh^ch our Sight is form'd. The Ear, with its Tymponum or Daiai, on which the diilurbed Particles of Air vibrate and Cauie a diveriity of Sounds. The cuick and conihnt Circulation of the Blood by the Diaftole and Syiloie of the. Heart, through certain large Veins or openings and fhuttings of it, Caufes Pulfation and preferves the statural Heat ! When this grand Wheel is broken at the Ciftern, the Stomack ccaies to digeft its Food, the whole Body grows cpld and livid, and all the Offices of Nature fail. Jfow different is that natural Heat which the Circulation or the B{o > I promotes from all others? Firev/ill gradually confume jttfelt, and all others which only have acquired Heat, v. grow Cold j whereas the former is preierved rri; . / V without Wafting the Parts of the Body ; and leaft the Heart mould be over heated by its continual Motion, which would be prejudicial to the whole frame, to preferve a due Tempe- rature, does not the Lungs ferve as a Fan to cool and re- frigerate it ? Arid do not the Union of the Body with the Soul, ; Being of a different Nature, def.rve our V> manifeftiv j>oint to an infinitely Wife and Almig it- Frov'd and improv'd. go its Author ? And thus I am led to fpeak of the other Particular before mentioned, or the other Part of the compound Man, and indeed the moll noble, viz. the Soul, whole excellent Powers and Capacities, if we do attentively furvey, we fhall be obliged to conclude, that it is God that has formed the Spirit oj Man within him. How railed and noble a Faculty is the Human Mind, which can form Ideas of Things a- bove its own Nature ? It reflects on Thirds pall, and this incites either our Pleafure or Regret. It aims at the Prof- peel; of Things to come, and thus it alarms our Fears or iwells our Hopes ! It beholds the Connection between Caufes and their Effects, Premifes and their Concluiion : It di'fcerns the moral Beauty and excellency of Virtue and Religion ! The Will, through the Aids of divine Grace, can chooie what is Good and refufe what is Evil. The Soul by it^ Reafonings evidently appears to be an Immaterial, and therefore an immortal Subflance ; for it is impoiTibie from the nature of Things, that meer Matter, however modified and put in Motion, can produce rational Reflections : And if fo, then it mull be formed by an All-wile and Almighty Being who is God. The Soul, by Reafon of its fpiritual and rational Nature*, is capable of moral Government and Religion, it deiires after God and indeed can be only Happy in the Enjoyment of him. And the immenfe and boundlefs deiires of the Soul evidently argue the reality of a Supream Being : All the En- joyments of Senfe, in their greatell Affluence and Varictv, ' do not fatwfy the cravings of our vail Deiires ! We ilil! reach after a more immenfe and adequate Good ! Then either there mull be an infinite Being, in whofe Embraces we may attain the compleat Happinefs we in vain feek elfewherc, or elic Nature has done fomething in vain, contrary to Arifiotle's juft Maxim: And thus the moil noble Creature of this N 2 lower io© The Divine Exiflence lower World would be made in its primitive ConftitutioR more miierable than the Brute-Creation, which is very ab- lurd. y. Another Argument to prove the Being of a God, may be the exact Accomplishment of .certain Prophefies concern- ing future contingent Events : This the Mind of Man can- not perceive without the AiTiilance of Divine Revelation : It's true we may judge that neceflary Caaifes will produce Effects according to their Nature, but reipe.cting Arbitrary, we cannot determine. Now that feveral fuch Prophe- fies have come to pafs, the Scriptures aiTert, which ought to pals for a credible Hiftory, till the Atheift proves the Contrary. 8. The Miraculous Works that have been wrought, ^ prove the Being of a God; for who but he can give .check to the courfe of Nature, and controul it's fixed , Laws and Or- der ? And that fuch have been wrought is not only evi- dent from the Scriptures, but Prophane Writings. So that he mull needs be a Scc-ptick, and deny all human Tefti- mony that denies this Fact! But to proceed, 9. The Teftimony of Confcience proves the .Being of a God. Are not Men iometimes terrified with the Dread of Puniihment, becaufe of thole Evils which no human Eye has feen them Commit, and which no human Law takes -cognizance of? and thefe uneafmefles they are not able totally to extinguish by all the Arts of Diveriion they can invent ! Neither can any worldly Grandeur exempt there- from, witnefs Nero and Caligula. And on the Contrary what a fweet Calm poiTefles pious Bofooms in the Way of Du- ty ? which make them fearlefs of evil Tidings ! add -to this, that the univerfal Conient of all ages gives Teftimony to the divine Exiflence. Tully and divers others afTert, cc That ; ' tki-rc is no Nation fo barbarous but what has acknowledged :a ■" SSat Proved and improved. 101 f ' Deity. Some indeed were verygrofs in their Idolatry, warjhip~ " ing Leeks and Onions, as fuvenal m his Satyrs obferves. Now altho' thofe unhappy Nations were miferably mif- taken as to the Object of Worfhip, yet their unanimous concurrence in paying divine Adoration to fomething, mews their acknowledgment of a Deity. Jf it be Objected, That Hiftory informs us of fome fpecu- lative Athei/is that have been, and of fome Countries in Africa and America that have no religious Worfiip. Anfw. The Number of fuch who have been recond speculative Atheifts has been very frnall, befides by the fear they have fometimes difcovered, they have plainly inti* mated, that they rather wifhed there was no God, than be- lieved there was none ; and fuppofing they did, it will not -weaken the Argument : Becaufe fome are born Fools will it follow that Reafon is not natural to Man ? As to -"the o- ther Particulars, the Facts are not fufheiently attefted, thofe that have aiferted them have not had familiarity enough with the Indians to know their Notions of a Deity : But fuppofing fome fhould fo far degenerate into .Brutes, as t« lay alide the Ufe of their Reafon in this Point, it cannot conclude againft the Majority who act rationally, and ar- gue from the Principles of Reafon they are endowed with, the Exiftence of a Deity 1 If it be objected, that God is not becaufe he is not feen. Anfw. This is fordid : Then the Soul is not, becaufe it is not feen, and thus thefe Men are Brutes in their own Account. If it be again objected, That the Wicked are projperous -And the Righteous affliSled. Anfiv. What then, is not God a Sovereign, may not "he* do what he will with his own ? But if it be further con- fidered , 103 The divine Exijtence proved fidered, that outward Profperity does not prevent inward Terror, and that good Men are made better by Af Hictions,. that divine Joy is confiftent with them, and that there will be a future judgment,, the Objection evanimes. But fome do further Object, That the Notion of a God- is apiece of State Policy, invented j or the Benefit of Civil Go- vernment, propagated by Tradition, and fvpported by Fear. Anf. But who was the Man, crfetof Men, that invented this, and when and where did they live ? Or when was the World without all Belief of a Deity ? Here the' Atheiil is nonpluft ! If the great Men of the Earth had invented the Notion of a God, is it reafon able to fuppofe that they themfelves would be fubject to the Terrors of it, as others have been ? And if the Belief of a God was a human In- vention, how comes it to be fo univerfally received, and that without the Methods of Force ? And why was the impofhjre never difcovercd in to long a Tract of Time ? It is likewife unreafonable to fuppofe that the Belief of a Deity has been propagated only by Tradition, for it is bot- tomed on the higheft Reafon, has univerially obtained,, and. continued in all the Changes of Time and" Revolutions of Nations ; whereas Notions received with implicit Faith by Tradition, are not grounded on Reafon ; are not uni- verially received, but liable to change and mnnuicn! It's likewife equally abiurd to fuppofe, that the Fear of Puniihment mould give rife to the Belief of a Deity ; For why mould Men be afraid of Punifliment for fecret- Crimes, if there was no God to punifh ? Surely their Fear iuppofes a God, and is the Effect of this Perfwaiion. And how. then. can the ErTec"); produce its Caufe ? Not to add that the primary Notion we have of God is, that be is a good tind lovely Being. The fearful Apprehenfions of his Ven- geance are but fecondary and the Fruit of Guilt, 6 What The Atheift 's folly exposed. 103 What has been obferved /hews us the folly of Atheifim, both Speculative and Practical ! But this appears more par- ticularly in the inftanccs following ; how ridiculous is the Epicurian Account of the Original of the World, viz, 'That this beautiful Structure flxuld fpring from the fortuitous Concourfe of Atoms in an immenfe Space ! It is as likely, as Tally obferves, " That all the Materials of a magnificent " Edifice Jhozdd of their own accord meet and unite together" " How long (lays a learned Man) might a Perfion jumble a u fct of Letters together , or filing them on the Ground, be- re evidence for Things than they are capable of! He alks mathematical Demonstration in moral and religious Matters, which can only be proved bv moral Arguments and credible Teflimony j their Nature admiting no other kind of Proof : But on the other fide he labours to believe by im- plicit Faith, again!! Reafon and Argument, that the Be- iioi of a God has been only propogated by Tradition, but cannot Account for his Notion. Again the AtheihVs folly appears in this, " That he pre- " tends to know certainly what no Man can be certain of, viz. " that there is ?io God. If he is not certain, howfoolifij is it " to deny and defpife finch a Being as God is I But how from ' v the nature of Things can a Man be certain tf a meer Ne- " gative, unlefs it implies a Contradiction, which the Being of ovefhn " as it were by an Oath" The moft ufual Name of God, in the New Teftament is Theos, which is (aid to. refer to Elohim " in the Old y and to ex- " prefs its Meaning" This Word is deriv'd of Verbs, which fignify to behold and difpofe, becaufe God beholds and difpofes of all Things according to his own good Pleafure. Here it may be obferv'd, that all the Names of God, befides Jehovah, tho' in ftridt propriety^ they belong to- the Almighty only, yet improperly, and by way of Analogy or Refemblance, they are afcrib'd ta Creatures. What has been faid upon this Head may excite us to be- ware of prophaning the Names of God either in our Hearts by Ignorance, or E'.rgetfulnefs, or by our Lips by a rafh and irreverent ufe of them, or by our Lives thro' impiety. The great God, has faid, that he will not hold them guilt lefs that take his Name in vain ! Thofe that name the Name of God, ought to depart from all Iniquity,. On, 'The general Nature and Kinds of Gods Attributes. tit On the contrary, we fhould declare and profefs God's Name call upon it, fear and reverence it, and confide in it. Acls ix. 14. 2 Tim. ii. 19. Joel ii. 32. Pro. xviii. 10. The Name of the Lord is a Jlrong Tower, the Righteous run to it .and are fafe ! But I proceed to the 2d, general Head, which was to diA courfe, upon thofe particular Attributes of God, which are fignify'd by the Name I AM or Jehovah. Here more general- ly it may be obferv'd, that the Attributes of God are fo call'd, becaufe we afcribe them to him ! They are the efjen- tial Property's of God, by which we attain fo me Knowledge of his Being : or in other Words, they are that one infinite Perfection of God, which thro' the Weaknefs and Finitenefs of our Under/landings , we conceive by various Acls, as % it were by Parts, juft as when we would fee the whole Ho- rizon, which is but one, we ufe various Acts of feeing, looking to the Eaft, Weft, North, South, until we fee the whole ! All the divine Attributes are in God, but one pure and fitnple Act. It is impofiible that that Being, who is ab- folutely the firft, mould be compos'd of different Things for this would fuppofe a Compofer prior to the Firft, which is impoftible ! Neither can an infinite Being confift of different Things : For thefe Things muft be either infinite or finite. Many infinites imply a Contradiction, neither can many finite Caufes produce an infinite Effect : Neither can an im- mutable and incorruptible Being confift of different Things, for where one Thing is compounded with another it may be feparated from it, and thus Change and Corruption would enfue ! Some Divines do diftinguifh the Attributes of God, into thofe that are communicable & incommunicable, the communica- ble Attributes of 'God are fuch as we find fome Shadow of in intelligent Beings -, of this Kind, are his Holinefs, fufiice^ Goodnejs 9 112 Explanatory Confideratkm Goodnefs, Truth. We find fomething like thefe in Creatures, tho' with vaft Difproportion ! in God they are infinitely, but in Creatures in a limited and finite Manner. But the incommunicable Attributes of God, are fuch -as we find no Shadow of in Creatures. Of this Kind are his hide- pendency, Eternity, Immutability and Jncomprehenfibility. Thefe fhew how infinitely diftant God is from all Crea- tures in refpect of Dignity and Excellency, and how he is oppos'd to every Imperfection in them. Now to afiiil our Conception of the divine Attributes, thefe Things following may be obferv'd. i. That feeing all the Attributes of God conftitute but one fimple Act, as has been before obferv'd, therefore no Degrees of Inequality are to be admitted among them in- wardly, and on God's Part, all and lingular ot them import infinite Perfection, which admits not of more or lets, not- withflanding it may be, that outwardly one Attribute may extend itfelf to more Objects than another, in which Senfe the Underftanding may be faid to be greater than the Will. Or it may act with more Intenfenefs upon one Object than another, in which Senfe God loves the Elect more than the Reprobate. And, 2. Much lefs can any Contrariety be admitted among them, if any fuch Thing feems to appear between Mercy and vindicative Juftice, this is altogether in the Object, about which the uniform Perfection of God, becaufe of its own Infinity, is occupied various Ways, or it is to be afcrib'd to our different Ways of conceiving of the divine Perfecti- on. And, *. When we think upon the Divine Attributes we muil remove far from them, all that Imperfection, which cleave^ to fuch like Properties in Creatures, and conceive that the remaining Perfection is attended with the higheft Eminence ip ( iod. 4. The general Theory of the Divine Attributes improved. 113 4. All the divine Attributes do truly belong to God, he is not only in refpect of our Thought, but in Regard of the Condition of his own Nature, wife, good, juft. And they belong to him not in the concrete only as they do to Creatures, but in the AbftrafH. He is not only wi(e y jiift, good, but Wifdom, Jiiftice y Goodnejs. In Creatures they are fecondarily, by way of Quality iuperaded to their Being, but in him they are primarily without De- rivation, and therefore his very Being it fclf. But here, before I proceed to a more particular Coniideration of the divine Attributes, I fhall offer a Word of Improvement, from what has been laid. Methinks the general Theory of divine Perfections ferves to ft-rengthen our Faith exceedingly, in refped of the Trinity : Seeing that the incommunicable Attributes of God which coinceede with the divine Effence, are not only afcrib'd to the Father, but to the Son and Holy Spirit. And with what Firmnefs and Freedom may we truft in God, and approach to his Throne of Grace ieeing there is- iuch a Concourfe of Perfections in him,, viz. of Wifdom, Power, Goodnefs, &c. of which every one is infinite, eternal, and immutable! What powerful Incitements do the -divine Attributes Minifter to ourPraife, Reverence, and Obedience, of and to the Sacred Trinity ? And how happy is that People who have fuch a great and glorious God for their Portion and Inheritance ? Well might the Pfalmiji hy y Ble/fed is that Peo- ple wl hofe God is the Lord, PJal. xxxiii. 12. When God is curs then all his Attributes are ours, and engaged to pro- mote our Benefit (Rom. viii. 31.) And his immutability ai- furesus, that he will remain Ours to all Eternity, {Mai. iii. 6.) His Truth is inviolable, and therefore we may with uefhak- en Confidence, reft on his Promifes, which cannot f i I P HI; j 1 4. God's Inccmprehenfibility prov'd. His Love and Goodnei's may calm us in all Adverfity, be- caufe they will caufe it to iffue in our Benefit. His Wifdom and Power enable him to do for us all that we need : and his Mercy inclines him to forgive our Sins, and to exert the other Attributes of his Nature in our Behalf. But I proceed to a more particular Connderation, ofthefe Attribute? of God which are fignified by the Name I AM, the rlrii of which is his Incomprehenfibilify. The Erlcnce of God as it is in itfelf, is inaccefiible to our Understandings. The Israelites enquire of Mofes % and Mo* fes of God, Concerning aName which might reprelent his Eft fence, and while the Almighty anfwers, I AM THAT I AM, reproving the Folly of the Qiieflion, what does it fig- nify, but that his EiTcnce is incomprehenfible, and therefore inexprefiible ! The fame Thing which Zopbar teaches his Friend, in plainer Terms. Job. xi. 7, 8, 9. Cdnfl then by fc arching find out Gcd? Canji then find cut the Almighty unto Perfection f It is as high as Heaven, what canji thou do ? Deeper than Hell, what canji then know f The Mcafure there- of is longer than the Earth, and broader than the Seal And hence he is faid to dwell in Light inaccefjiile, which no Mortal Eye hath feen nor can fee. 1 lim. vi. 16. neither with the Eyes of the Body, or of the Mind ; and hence he is cali'd the invifible Gcd, 1 Tim. i. 17. Therefore the Almighty deny'd to Mofes a Sight of his Face, while in the mean Time he fhew'd him his back Parts. By all our Contemplations - we rather know what the Effence of God is not than what it is. Now the Reafons of the Point under our prefent Con- fideration, arethefe following, viz. 1. The Being of God is infinite and therefore cannot be comprehended by a finite Mind. 2. The Divine Effence is a moft pure and Ample Acl, void of all Compofition, and therefore cannot be po- sitively conceiv'd of; and hence the Apoftie calls Jehnvah, not God's Incomprchoifibility prcv'd. 115 not a SubAance Aiming in the Concrete, but Light in the AbAract ; and therefore he is not, nor cannot be ihcn. 3. The Being of God is moft Amply one, by which it is fo different from all Creatures, that it agrees with them in no- thing : and therefore no Idea of the divine Effence can be borrow'd from them. And how then can a proper Defini- tion thereof be formed by us. But it may be objected againA what has been faid under this Head, that the Scriptures informs us, that God has been feen by many of the Saints, particularly by Abraham, Ifaac, and Jacob, Mofes, Ifqiah, and others, Job was perfuaded that with the fame Eyes he Jhouldfee God, and the ApoAle Paul informs us, 1 Cor. xiii. 12. that here we fee darkly, but then, meaning in Heaven, wejhallfee Face to Face. The a- forefaid Places are to be underAood either of a fymbolical Vilion, not of the Effence, but of the Operations of God, under certain Signs, or of the more 'perfect Knowledge or God, which will be attain'd in the Paradife of God ; which in its Perfection Aiall imitate Sight or Knowledge by it, yea exceed it ; but they do not infer the Yifion of his EfTence. But that the Meaning of what has been offer'd, may be the better underAood ; it is to be obferved that our Difcourfe is not concerning God, but the ErTence of God as it is con- ceiv'd dilfinct from his Attributes, or as it is conceived, as fomething iubAracted or as the ArA Being, which the At- tributes perfect. And 2. our Difcourfe is not concerning the Effence of God that it is, for that is many Ways evident ; but what it is in itfelf, and not in the Attributes. This our Minds can have no apprehenAve or comprehenAve Know- ledge of, for the Reafons before mentioned. And indeed in this Refpedt we cannot know the Effence of Angels, or of our own Souls I P a Is 1 1.6 God's Incomprehcnfibility improved. Is the Divine EfTsnce incomprehensible, then i. this mould reprefs carnal Curiofity which appears in Enquiries about Things too high for us, and inaccefUble to us, and a- bout Things we need not to know for Orientations lake, or fome other mean End, or in bold Sayings about what we underfland not j as for Example, when Perlbns fay that the Divine Eflen'ce is but a Thought as the Cartefians, fuch Arc wife above what is written, i. This vain Curiofity is for- bidden by God himfelf, Ex. iii. 4, 5. God caWd unto Mo- fes andfaid, draw not nigh hither. Ex. xix. 21. And the Lord Jaid unto Moles go down charge the People, left they break thro* unto the Lord to gaze, and many of them per if. 2. It is a Piece of foolifh Pride to pretend to grafp Infinity. 3. For looking into the Ark, Fifty Thoufand and Three/core and Ten Men of the Bethfliemites were fain 1 Sam. vi. 19. 2. We mould be excited to labour to be mode ft, while we think or fpeak about the Being or Ertentials of God, this Modefly mould be expreffed in the following Particulars, 1. Before we meditate on thofe Things, we fhould implore the divine Direction and Illumination, according to David's Example, Pf. cxix. 18. Open thou mine Eyes, that I may behold wondrous Things out of thy Law. 2. We mould be poflefs'd with pious Fear and Solicitude while we are oc- cupy'd about fuch Things, in Imitation otAbram, who fpoke to God with the deepefl Pveverence, (Gen. xxxi. 3.) Neither mould we fpeak, without confulting the divine Oracles, in Imitation of Mofcs in our Text, they fall fay unto me, \ is his Name, and what fall I fay unto them? In Imitation of Agure (Prov. xxx. 2, ^.) We mould confefs, that wc are more brutifh than any Men, and have not attain'd the Knowledge of the Ploly ! After the Example of the Angels we mould as it were cover our Faces j this Modefly God himfelf requires, Levit. x. 7. I will be fancTifed in them, that God's Inco??jprehenfbility improved. ny that come nigh me. And indeed the Nature of the Thing de- mands it, that a poor Worm while he is occupy'd about God and divine Things, mould fludy Modefty. If Mofes out of Reverence to the Place whereon he Hood, becaufe it was holy mull pull off his Shoes ! How much more than mould we expreis Reverence for God himfelf with whom we have to do. And indeed the Judgments of God that have been inflicled upon thole who have treated divine Things with Irreverence, mould excite us to Modefty. But who were thefe ? I anfwer, Korah, Dathan and Abiram were fwallow- ed up by the Earth alive, Num. xvi. 31, 32. Uzzah wasjlruck dead, for touching the Ark 2 Sam. vi. 7. many of the Beth- fhemites were fain for looking into it. 1 Sam. vi. 19. And King Uzziah was J mitten with Leprofe,jor medling with the Pr lefts Office, in offering Sacrifice. 2 Chron. xxvi. 16. 20. It may be fome help to our exercifing the aforelaid divine Vertue, if we compare the Majefly of God with our Vile- nefs, and ferioufly confider the Infinite difrance of God and divine Things, from Our weak Underitandings ! As alfo how eafy and dangerous it is for us to miftake in Matters of lb great Moment ? fob xlii. 7. And it was fo that after the Lord had fpokcn thefe Words unto Job, the Lord jaid unto E- liphaz the Temanite, my Wrath is kindled againft thee, and a- gainft thy two Friends, for ye have not fpoken of me the Hhing that is right, as my Servant Job hath. But I proceed to confider the 2. Attribute of God, which is fignified by the Words I AM, viz. his Self-Exiftence or Independancy. The Almighty by thole Words, informs Mofes that he was abfolutely in and of himfelf, not poftive- ly, as tho' he had produced himfelf, but negatively, be- caufe his Being and Perfections were deriv'd of no other ; or in other Words, the Almighty by the aforefaid ExprefTion declares himfelf, to be abfolutely the firil Being, and intire- lv ii8 The Self-Exijlence of God proved. Jy independent of any other prior Caufe, either Efficient by whom he mould be ; or material of whom he mould be, or for?nal by whom he mould be, what he is ; or final to whom as an End he mould be directed. All Creatures live and move, and have their Beings in and from God, but it is his peculiar Glory, to derive his Being from none. From the Firftnefs, Afeity, Self-Exigence, and Independ- ance of the Divine EiTence or Being, naturally and necef- ilarily follows, the Independance of ail his Attributes e.g. 1 . His Goodnefs is independent, he vouchsafes Benefits up- on whom, and when he pleafes, his nicer Sovereignty alone determines not only the Objects and Time of conferring his Kindneffes, but alio the Kind x Meafure & Duration of them. He hath Mercy upon whom he will have Mercy, nothing with- out himfelf can influence, fir lefs con (train him: For this would argue Imperfection and Dependance. 2. His Holinefs is independent, he hates Sin, not for any Reafons without himfelf, but becaufe of the eternal Con- trariety of his Nature thereto. 3. His Power is likewife independent, as he has derived it from none, io he depends upon none in the Exerciie there- of. And therefore cannot be control'd by Creatures in Ins providential Proceedings. lie does what he plcafcs in the Ar- mies of Heaven, and among the Inhabitants of the Earth, and who can flay his Hand, or fay to him what doe/i then ? 4. The Wifdom of God is independent, his Wifdom is not in him, as a Quality added to his Being, as it is in Creatines, but it is himfelf, he receives not his Ideas from Objects without himfelf, as Creatures do, in which refpect. they are dependant on them; but the Knowledge of God was infinite , before any Creature had a Being. Hence the Royal Prophet enquires with Beauty and Emphafis? Who hath directed tie Spirit cj the Lord, with whom took he Ccun- tily TheSelf-ExifienceofGodprcv'd. H9 cil, and iph& injlr acted him in the Path of Judgment? Ifa. xl. 13, 14. The Scriptures give Teftimony to the Self-Exiftence and Independency of God, Rev, i. 8. lam the Alpha & Omega, the Beginning and the Ending faith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to ccme, the Almighty. The fame is re- peated in the Book of the Revelations frequently. And Reafon alfo confirms the aforefaid Truth. Seeing it is abfurd to fuppofe, that any Thing mould be the Cauie of itfelf, for then it mull be and not be at the fame Time ; and fee- ing that an infinite SuccefTion of Caufes is impomble, for then the next Caufe which produceth tHe Effect, would not fubfift, becaule there is no End to Infinity : There mud of necefhty be fome firft felf-exifting Being, which we call God. Now from this Firftnefs or Self-Exiftence of God ; proceed his Unity, Immutability, Infinity and Simplicity. And 1. his Unity. What is abfoiutely the firft Being, muft needs be one j for if more fuch be imagin'd, neither will be abfoiutely the firft, becaufeit does not preceed the other. 2. Immuta- bility ; If he is changed, he is changed by another, and that other muft be before him, but what can be before him that is abfoiutely the Firft ? 3 . His Infinity \ Whatfoever is limitted, is limitted by another, for nothing can limit itfelf, and its own Perfection, & that other muft be before it, but what can be be- fore him who is abfoiutely the firft ? 4. His Simplicity. What- foever is compos'd, is compos'd by one prior to itfelf; but what can be before the Firft ? Again the Independance of God, appears evidently from his producing all Things by his Pow- er. Such Things as he has made muft needs depend upon his Fewer and Pleafure for their Being and Support, now if they depend on him, how can it be that he mould de- pend on them ? To fuppofe the Gaufe and Effect to be mutually dependant on each other, is to fuppofe they are mutually deriv'd from each other, which is impoffible ! Once I 20 The Sclf-Exiftence of God improvd. Once more, if God be infinitely above the nobleft Crea- tures, then he cannot depend on them, for dcpendance argues inferiority. Now that God is above all created Beings, is mod manifeft. The Nations are but as the Drop of a Bucket, as the j ma II Dufl of the Balance, yea as no- thing and lefi then nothing and Vanity, as- the Royal Pro- phet obferves, with noble Pomp of Diction-. Is God in- dependent, then 1 ft. Hence we may learn the Sin and Folly of aicribing this divine Attribute to dependant Crea- tures ! On the Contrary let us conclude that all our $r>nn are in God, from him all our Bleffings flow ; he is tl the only Source of our Happinefs, the Foundation of our Hope, the Author and finifher of our Faith. And 2dly. Our inability to lay the Almighty under any Obli- gation by our Services, feeing he is independent, and fo : compleatly Happy in himfelf, who hathfirft pven to lim, fayeth the Apoftle Paul and it fall be recompenfed to hint again ! for of him and thro' him and to him are all Tilings. Our Goodnefs extends not to him, fays the Pfalmij}, can a Man be profitable unto God, faith Eliphaz, as he that is Wife may be profitable to himfelf, or is it any gain to him that thou makeft thy Ways perfect ? J'cbxxu. 23. 3dly, We may hence learn the Sinfullnefs and Dan r of oppofing God's Sovereignty, cither ift. Openly by wifl - i'ng itaboliih'd, (Pfal 14. r, arid 10, 4.)' Or 2% inter- pretatively, when Men in the Bufinefs of Prccleftination, believe that the Grace of Gad is fufpended upon forefeen Faith and Good Works. Such Peribns do deprive God of his abfolute Sovereignty, and afcribe an Independance to the Creatures Will ; and thus they jumble Heaven and Earth together. Or 3UIV practically in the following Inftan- ces, ift. When Peribns limit God, Pja, lxxviii 41. Pre- ferring to him the Time, Manner, and Means, of Delive- rance The divine Independency improved. 121 ranee, or in a greater or lerTer Degree diflrufc his Word and Power. Numb. xi. 21, 23. And 2dly, When Perfons by Diiobedience difpute the divine Dominion, and ftruggie with him for Independency, after the example of Pha- roh, (Exo. v. 2.) and other ungodly Perfons. {Job. xxi. 14.)' And 3-dly, when Men will not acquiefs in the Decrees and Providences of God, . but murmur againil him, {Rom. ix. 20.) All thofe Sorts of Perfons, I have now mention'd do endeavour tho' in different Degrees and Modes, to dc- i'lroy the Eifence of God, which coniifes in abfolute Inde- pendance, and therefore are Atheifls, or at leaft partake in an awful degree of Atheifm. All Mich mail find God to be fuch, as they would not have him to be, except they re- pent he mall be to them a fevere Judge, a conlurning Fire, as a Bear bereav'd of her Whelps, They mall "find him to- be fuch as Pharoh, the Ameiftof old, found him. Jer. 16... ult. Therefore, bebo/d, I will this once caufe them to knew, I will caufe them to know mine Hand and my might, and they jl: all know that my Name is the Lord, But, Athly, From hence we may learn the comfortable State of thofe who have a covenant Jntereft in God. Amidftali the Difficulties of this Prefent Life r do they want the Goods of Fortune, Honour, Wealth, Relations ? Are they co- ver'd with Reproach, and counted the oifcourings of the World? Do they want the neceflary liipports of Life, and are their dear Relations Dead ? Do they want the Goods of the Body, Health, Peace, Liberty ? Are are plaug'd with E- nemies, Perfecutors, and tafk Mailers ? Do they want the Goods of the Mind, viz. neceflary Wifdom, fpiritual Light, and Comfort ? And do their Enemies fometimes lead them Captive ? What can in fuch Cafes and in ail others of the like Nature, more effeciiially fupport and comfort us, then to think, ill, That God is. By winch Argument the Q J Almightjf 122 The divine Independence improved ' Almighty comforted the Ifraelites in our Text. And Afaph himfelf^ Pja. lxxiii. 25. 26. TVho?n have I in Heaven but hce ? a?id there is none upon Earth that I dejire befidcs thee. My FIcfi and my Heart faiieth : But God is the Strength of my Heart and my Portion for ever. And adly, That God is eminently all being, he is omni- cient and perfectly knows our wants, he is omnipotent, and can eafily fupply them, in his Hand is Power and Might. He is infinitely Gracious and Merciful, and fo will not finally forfake his poor People, but is inclined to relieve them. He is Ali-futficient, porTefiing every Thing that lerves to fupply his Peoples Necefiitys, and remove their Miferies ! He is a Su?z and Shield, a hiding Place from the Windy &c. And 3 clly. That God is not only to himfelf, but to us All in All, the Author of our Beings and Fountain of every of our Blefiings ! 4thly. That he is a SeJf-Exi fling, and by confequence an Independent and Eternal God ! whole Help does not depend on Creatures or Inftraments, and whole Love will never change in any vicifitude of Circumftance, or SuccefTion of Duration. I AM THAT I AM, I (hall be THAT I AM. From the afore faid Confiderations fpring fweet Sup- port and Solace in every immergent, in cafe we do but clofe heartily with God in Covenant, by which he may be- come ou r G o d . "jcr. xxx i . 33. But in the lafb Place. By what has been before obferv'd, we mould be exhorted to perform the following Duties lit, We mould put our Truft in God, and him alone, feeing that he is that one I AM, by his Efience, who by his fovereign and almighty Beck, can command Light to fpring out of Darknefs, Order out of Confufion, and call the Things that are not as tho' they were ! Curfed is the Man that trujleth in Man or makeih Flejh his Arm, whofi Breath The divine Independency improved* I 2 j Breath is in his Nofrils, who is crufhed before the Moth, who changcth with the Wind, and is lighter than Vanity I The great I AM is only worthy of our entire Confidence,, his Immenfity and Almightinejs are only equal to our valt Defires : His Independent Excellency is only worthy of our Jupream Love -, and his Eternity is only parallel to our inter- minable Duration. He, he, will never fail the believing Expectation of his People ! 2dly. Let us deny our Wifdom, Will and Power, and lay with our dear Lord, thy Will be done and not mine : Being always mindful that God only is- independent and 'the fir ft mover ofsH. jdly. Let its humble cur- fives before the great I AM, whofe Prerogative it is alone to be abfolutely ; in Companion of whom we poor de- pendent Worms are not, are nothing, and lefs than nothing, as a drop of the Bucket compared with the vaji Ocean, and as a little Duft in the Balance compared with the whole Globe of the Earth ! 4. We mould receive the Word of God, and Minifters of it, with due Pveverence and Re/peel. For this End MofeSy in our Text, was furnimed with Credentials, go to the People of Ifrael and tell them, that I AM hath fent me unto you. Thole that defpife thefaithful Minifters of Christ, defpife thro' them their Mailer, and mult; ex- pec! to meet with their Reward in this or the next Life, except they Repent ! No Employment on Earth is attended with more Difficulty, and yet more poorly Rewarded in this Life, than the Minilterial Office ! Many think their Tongues- are their own, and that they may fcourge them with falfe Inveclives as they lilt j and many, who leem to make Con- fcience of their other Debts, think they are at Liberty t® wrong them and rob them of their promis'd Maintahrace, and act accordingly. But 5thly, and finally. Let us be excited to glorify God on Account of his Independency, in Heart, Lip and Life. Let Q^ 2 us 124 Tbe divine Independency iinprcnSd. us bow before the Sovereign God, and fubmit ourfelves to his equitable Government and unerring Difpofals, with the greater!: Readinefs and humbleft Reverence ! Let us extol Jeho-vah the abfolute Lord of the whole Univerfe, witn chearful Acclamations, inceffant and harmonious Hofanna's on the Account of this very venerable Jewel of his Crown I In this Way we may expecl to be owned by the Independent Sovereign of Heaven and Earth here, and accepted by him hereafter at the grand and important Advent of the Son of God, when univeriai Nature difTolving in Agony and Con- fufion, ihall open the moil amazing and tremendous Scene ] SERMON Divers Acceptations of the Word Eternity. 125 . EXODUS, iii. 14. And God find unto Mofes, I AM THAT I AM : And he /'aid, thus ft alt thou fay unto the Children of Ifrael, I AM hath fent me unto you, IN Difcourfing on this Text you may remember, that in the preceeding Sermon alter an Explication of it and more general Obfervations upon the divine Attributes, I proceeded to ipeak upon two particulars, namely, the Incomprehcnfibility and Independency of God, which I appre- hended were included in it. And moreover made mention of two others, which I am now to difcourfe upon, viz. the Eternity and Immutability of God. In fpeaking upon the 'Eternity of God, I mall endeavour to explain, confirm and Improve this great Truth. And 1 ft. The Word Eternity fometi'mes fignifo, a long fpace of Time that hath both a Beginning and End. Thus he that ferv'd to the Year of Jubilee, is faid to ferve for ever, Ex. xxi. 6. And fo the Ceremonial Laws are faid to be forever^ Num. x. 8. 2dly. Sometimes it fignihes a Dura* ■tion, which has a Beginning but no End. Thus it is with the Angels and our own Souls. And ^dly. Sometimes it iignifles a Duration without Beginning or End, which is ap- plicable to God only, and diftinguifhcd from the other Sig- nifications 126 God's Eternity defer lb' d. hifications by redoubling of the Words time, forever and ever, from everlafling to everlajling. Various Delcriptions are given by different Divines of Eternity. " That is properly Eternal (hys.Petavius) which " never had a Beginning nor never can ceafe to be" " Eter- 11 nity (fay Drexilius, Barlow, and Prideaux) is an ever " p re J en t Duration, it is one perpetual Day, which pajj'cs not M into what is pafl or future" ct That is Eternal (fays M Zanchy) which wanting Beginning and Ending is flill the "fame." Eternity (fzy$ Boetius) is a full and perfect Poffef- " fion of interminable or everlafling Life together and at once" But the moil eaiy and intelligible Deicription thereof is this, viz. that it is an imcommuni cable Perfection or Property- of the Deity, whereby his Duration is without Beginning, Succejjicn and End. And i ft. That the Duration of the Almighty was with- out Beginning, is evident both from Scripture and Reafon, Deut. xxxiii. 27. The eternal God is thy Refuge, and under- neath are the ever la fling Arms ! Pfal. xciii. 2. Thy Throne is eflabl/Jhed of Old, thou art from Everla/fing. And hence the People of God are laid to be chofen before the Foundation of the V/orld. And Reafon alio confirms the fame Truth,. as follows, ift. If God created all Things in the Beginning of Time, than he himfelf was before it, and ib by coniequence from Eternitv. Time being in its Nature a fuccemve Dura- tion, taking its rife from a certain Point or Moment, which is termed a Beginning : The Duration which was before it muft be Eternal, unlefs we fuppofe Time to begirt before it did begin, which is a Contradiction . But God did create all Things in the Beginning, as both Scripture and Re- ion aflure us, Ergo. 2dly. The Eternity of God may be inferr'dfrom the Per- fection of his Nature. His Duration is Perfect, and there- fore God's Eternity pronfd tzy fore Infinite ; for to begin to exift is an Imperfection, on which Account Creatures are faid to be but of Tefterday t which is a diminutive Character. If God was not from E- ternity, what he is, he would not be God, becaufe God is a moft perfect Being, u e. who has all Perfection which is or can be : Now that which is deftitute of Exigence, is deftitute of all that Perfection which is in Exiftence j yea he would be diftitute of Eflence alfo, for Eflence and Ex- iftence are in God one and the fame. ^diy. If God was not from Eternity then Nothing would exift. For if the Firft does not exift, a Second or a Third cannot, as appears from the Subordination of Caufes. 4thly, If God was not from Eternity, there was a Time when he was not, and than he would not be now. For either he muft produce himfelf before he was, and fo be and not be at the fame Time, or be produe'd by another, who by Confequence muft be before the Firft ; both which are equally abiiird : For it is efTential to God to be abfolutely the firft Being and Self-exiftent. 5thiy. Seeing that the Almighty gave Being to all Crea- tures, witch is imply'd in their being fuch, it will necenarily follow, that he could not receive his Being from them, and fo muft needs be from Eternity. And 2 dry. As the Duration of God is from Eternity, fo it is without Succeffton. Years and Days cannot properly be afcrib'd to him, no Times have paffed over him, he enjoys himfelf in an everlafting now ! It cannot be properly laid, he was, but that he is, and hence is his Name I AM. One Day is therefore with him as a Thoufand Tears, and a Thou- [and Tears as one Day. There can be no Sitcceinon in the Duration of the Almighty, for the following Reafons, i ft. Becauie it is Infinite. Now what is Infinite cannot be X28 God's Eternity provd. be meaiured by fucceffive Parts and Periods, for it Has none. 2dly. The Duration of God is unchangeable, and there- fore it hath no Succefiion. This the Pfaimijl confirm" Pfal. cii. 27. Thou art the fame and thy Years fall have no find. Now that which hath Succeiiion, is not the lame, for every Moment adds fomething to it which it had not be- fore. But 3diy, As the Almighty has no beginning or Succejjion in Duration, thus he is likewiie without End. Hence it is faid, that he liveth for ever and ever, and that his Tears fhall have 1:0 End, Rev. iv. 9, 10. Pfi. cii. 27. The fol- lowing Arguments tend to eftablifh this Truth, viz. ill. God is a moffc flmple Being, void of all Compofi- tion, and therefore can never have an End from anynecei- fity of Nature, there being no Tendency therein, to a Di- folution. It is true, compounded Beings becaufe of their va- rious Parts, are liable to a Diiblution, which ariies from the contrariety of thofe Parts of which they are conftitutsd, which tends to deffroy each other, and fo to difiblve the Compound 3 but the Almighty hath, no Parts. 2dly. The Self-Exi/ience of God y which has been before prov'd, (hews that as he could not begin to be, io neither can he ceaib to be. For as Johcvah has deriv'd his Being from none, fo he depends upon none for its continuance*. And feeing all Creatures owe their ordinal to him, he has no equal, much lefs iliperior, who can deprive him of his Exiffence ! 3dly. Neither can the Almighty Defirc or Will his own Deftruc~t.ion, for that is contrary to the Nature and Reafon of Things. No wife Being penciled of compleat Plappinefs, can Will the lofs thereof, becaufe Plappinefs is the proper Objecft of deiire ! Now a Diflrudion of the Being, would ne- cciiariiy The Nature of Time defcrifrd. 1 2 of eerTarily deftroy the Happinefs poffefs'd by it ; and therefore it cannot be defired by God. Well then, it' the Almighty cannot ceafe to be from any neceflity of Nature, or by the Will of another, or by any Act of his own, he mult needs exiff. to Eternity. And , 4thly. Eternity is peculiar to God : Tho' fome Creatures be Everlafling, as Angels and the Souls of Men, yet they had a Beginning, have Succeffion in their Duration, and: depend for its Continuance upon the Power and Will of God ! and therefore their Duration is not neceifarv and J independant. Whereas on the Contrary the Duration of God, as has been obferv'd had no Beginning, has no Suc- ceilion, and neither mail have, nor can have an End. But becaufe Contraries ferve to illurlrate each other, let me obierve fome what concerning the Nature of Time : This is as fome obierve, the meafure of the Creatures Du- ration. It has no diftmct Being of its own, but is an Adjunct or Quality that belongs to Creatures, which hastheie three ingredients in it, namely, iff. A Beginning; that which once was not, muft needs begin to be, if it ex ills at all : Thus at the Creation of the World, we read of the Begin- fng of Time, which mews that Creatures are the Gff- fpring of it, and meafured by it. Time gives date to their Exiftence. 2dly. Time hath Succeffion, it is not all at once, but flows by- Degrees, it ffands not, but is flill in Motion, it coniifts of divers Parts or Moments, which are in a continual Flux, fucceeding each other conflantly, by thefe we calculate the Space or Term of a Creatures Exiflence. 3dly. Time hath alio an End or Period, and this is rcfpect- ing the Creature, when it ceafes to be. The aforefaid Par- ticulars give Room for our dhtinguifhing Time into that which is paft, prefent, and to come. Ti?nepaft is all the Space R, or 130 ^ more particular Defcription of God's Eternity. or Duration, which the Creature has run thro' from its firfl Exiftence to the prefent Point Gr Minute. Time prefent is the Moment of Exiftence, which is now in being. Time to come, is that which remains of the Creatures appointed Du- ration, until it expires. Now it's impoflible to make thole different Periods of Time to fubfift at Once. Whereas on the contrary Eternity, as has been obfcrv'd, is aper- petual Now, having no Beginning, Succeffhn or End. That we may have fome Idea of the Eternity of God, it will not be improper to reprefent to ourfelves, certain temporal Spaces, and by thofe to compafs the divine Dura- tion, as we cannot conceive of the divine Immenfity or Omniprefence, without the Spaces of Place, fo neither can we conceive of his Eternity without the Spaces of Time, but w r e mould be cautious in the mean Time, that we do not conceive thefe different Spaces to be real Beings, otherwifewe mail conceive of many Eternals, And 2dly. That as in the Spaces of Place, we admit not of Extention, or of the Di- menfic-ns of Length and Breadth, fo in the Spaces of Time, we admit not of Succeffton, or a Flux of Moments. The Schoolmen truly defcribe Eternity, " to be an inter- '" minable, indivi/ible, and independent Duration." It is in- ter?ninable, becaufe it wants Beginning and End. Indivijible, becaufe it has no Succeffton of Moments. Independent , be- caufe it has no Imperfection or Change, nor any Poffibili- ty thereof. It is certain that the Almighty exifts with all the Periods of Time, viz. part, prefent and future, immoveable and un- mov'd, which the Antients did in fome fort fhadow forth by a Circle, whofe Center remain'd unmov'd, notwithstand- ing of various Agitations in the Circumference. And the following Similitude may be ufed to the fame End, viz. Of a Man fitting by the Bank of a River, he fees only the Water A' more particular Defcription of God's Eternity, i 3 f Water that is prefent, not that which is pair, or that which is to come, but when he is lifted up on high, he lees the whole River in its Spring, and Courie, and Outlet, &nd it is^ prefent with him.. Hence it appears, that in God there- is nothing pari, prefent, or to come, for thefe are but the Afpe&s of Time, upon Creatures. Eternity admits of no Divifions, all Things are prefent before God at once.^ Things move in refpedt of themfelves, but not in refpedt of God : He fees them all at once, both pair, prefent and to come.. And tho' he is before, and in, and after all Time, for he has made it, yet it caufes no Alteration in him, be- caufe he is no Subject of Time, and has no Dependance upon it. And for this Reafon God cannot wax old, Time has no Relation to him, it cannot be the Meafure of his Ex- iftence, becaufe it is Eternal. And therefore when in Scrip- ture, he is. called the Antient of 'Days, it is only after the Manner of Men, to fuit the Weaknefs of our Conception, which cannot form an Idea of Eternity, but under the Notion of an Infinite Space of Time. But the nobleft Creatures, even the Angels, had a Begin- ning, once they were not, They have likewife a Succejfion, being finite, they cannot poflibly poflefs an Eternal now : And therefore their Duration muff be progrefTive. And tho' they have no Tendency to Mortality in their Natures, yet are they dependant on their Creators Pleafure, who can fpeak them to nothing by the Word of his Power in a Moment. But an Objection may be offer'd againft what has been be- fore afTerted, namely this, is not the Creation of the World paft, with God, when he made it in Six Days, Anf. God's Acts are Two-Fold, ift, Immanent terminated in himfelf. (Ephef, L .9.) Thofe have no Succeffion, the Almighty did not devife one Thing after another. 2dly Tran/ient, in and upon tlie. Creature, fuch as Creation, Providence, R 2> Vocation, 1^2 The Creatures Vanity expos' 'J. Vocation, 6cc. And here we miaft diftinguifh between the Act it felf, and the Work produced by it. Gods Act in creating is the Act of his Will, that luch a Creature mould exift in Time, but if we confider the Work itfelf produe'd, fo the .Creatures have a Being one after another. Is God Eternal? Then thisj/faeyvs, ift. The Vanity and Frailty of all Creatures, who are different from God, they are the Offfpring of Time, but he is the Father of Eterni- ty. They are of Yefterday and may foon ceaie to be, but He, and He only, is from Everlafting to Everlafting ! What if they mould fubfift a Thoufand Years, this Space compar'd with Eternity is but as a Day, nay not fo much, for between a Thoufand Years and a Day, there is fome Proportion, but between a Thoufand Years and Eternity there is none ! Yea if we confider the Duration of Creatures abfolutely, without refpect to Eternity, feeing it confifts of a continual Succefiion, they fubfift but for a Moment : For the Time paft ceafes to be, and the Time to come has not begun to be, and what then remains, but the prefent Moment ? How foolifh is it therefore, for fuch as we are to be Proud, or to promife our felves any thing ftable, any durable Satis- faction, from any fleeting Creature Enjoyment, whether of of Honour, Profit or Pleafure ? And how vain to let our Hearts upon that which is not ? And on the Contrary how prudent is it for us to fix our fupream Love upon an Eter- nal God, and him alone, that he may be our Habitation in all Generations ? And, adly. This Subjecl affords great Comfort to all that are tru- ly Religious, amidft all the Sorrows that ipring from the fluc- tuating and uncertain State of Creature Enjoyments. Do our dear Friends and Relations die, and are our Goods fnatch'd from us by Force or Fraud, or otherwife remov'd ? Weil this is our Comfort, that God live?, that he will remain ever The Eternity of God improved. 1 3 3 forever and will never fail. Does Sin terrify us with its A- gravations, Behold the Mercy of God endures for ever y Pfal. ciii. \j. Are we in fpiritual Defertion, behold God is Eter- nal, and his Love is like himfelf ! Whom he loves, he loves to the End I For ajmall Moment helve Iforfahen thee,, but with great Mercy will I gather thee ! In a little Wrath I hid my Eacefrom thee ; but with ever la/ling Kindnefs will I have Mercy 011 thee ', faith the Lord thy Redeemer ■-, Ila. liv. 7, 8. If under the Terrors of Death, how fweet is it to meditate on the Eternity of God, who makes Death the Way to his Peoples enjoying eternal Life ! And whatever other Diffi- culty we are under, how fweet is it to think, that thefe light Afflictions, which are but for a Moment, do work for us an exceeding and eternal Weight of Glory. In the Lord "Jehovah is evcrlafti?ig Strength, and from him we mall re- ceive everlafiing Love and Salvation ! And furely this is an over Bal lance for all the Miferies of Life ! But 3dly This Subject opens a Scene of Terror to unbelieving impenitent Sinners ! God's Being is eternal, and fo he will ever live to punim you. He is the living God, the everlafling King, at his Wrath the Earth Jl:all 'tremble ', and the Nations /hall not be able to abide his Indig?7ation ! Pfal. xc. 11. His Power is eternal; and thus he will be always able to make you inexpreffibly miferable, his Juftice, Holinefs, Truth and Wrath, which incline him to exercile his Power againft you, are eternal \ Who knows the Power of thine Anger, lays the Pfalmijl, According to thy Fearfo is thy Wrath, xc. 11. It is a fear fid Thing to fall into the Hands of the living or eternal God I Heb. :;. 31. Befides Sin, without a Pardon thro' a Mediator, is Eternal ! The Sinner is likewife Eter- nal \ The Prifon of Hell Eternal I The Fire of Hell kind- led by the Breath of God like a River of Brimftone Eternal ] The Puni/hment of Lois, viz. the Privation of an infinite Good ry i The Eternity oj God improved. Good Eternal ! The Punishment of Senfe, viz. the Worm, of Confcience Eternal ! And all this for the momentary Enjoyment of Sin. Should not all thefe Things incline us to avoid and deteft Sin, and likewifeto bewail it, and ieek a. Remedy. in him who has brought in everlafting Righteouf- nefs ? In fine, the Eternity of God fweetly invites to glorify God on account of this divine Perfection, by high Thoughts of God, and humble Acknowledgments of this adorable Ex- cellency, as well as by earned feeking of God, and placing our Happinefs in him alone, .and' not in the fleeting Enter- tainments of Time. O let us believe, imdy, and live to Eternity! 2 Cor. Ly.^1.8'.. While we look not at the Things which are feen, but at the Things which are not feen : For the 'Things which are feen are Temporal, but the Things which are not feen are Eternal ! Let us molt firmly believe the Eternity of the, divine Being and Attributes,, as well as of a future State of Rewards and Puniihments, which will much influence our whole Life to Vcrtue and Goodnefs ! Let ui daily fpend a little Time in meditating on Eternity, that we may apprehend fomewhat of its awful Nature, and in- expreriible Moment to us, either in our Salvation or Damna- tion, and finally let us live to Eternity, let us think of it, , fpeak of it, intend it, and labour for it, above any Thing elfe. Let us work, and furTer, and pray for a happy Eter- nity. This, this is only worthy of our fupream Affections and vigorous Purfuits. If we are rifen with CHRIST, let us fet our Aff'ccliofis on the Things above. But I proceed to difcourfe upon the 4th divine Attri- bute, which I obferv'd was included, in the Words I AM, viz. The Immutability of God. In treating upon which, I fliall I. prove this Truth, that God is immutable, IL . Explain it. tit; The Immutability of God prov'd, 1 3 5 III. Anfwer fome Objections IV. Improve the Whole. And 1 ft. The Scripture proves this many Ways, ift. By re- moving all Shadow of Change from God. Jam. i. 17. with whom there is ?io Change or Shadow of turning. The Origi- nal Words (parallage & tropes apofciafma) here us'd, are a Metaphor borrow'd from the Sun, which as Aftronomers fay, has its Paralaxes or various Afpects. It appears other- ways at its riling in the Eaft, from what it does at its fetting in the Weft, it likewife appears differently at Mid Day, it hath alfo various Changes, fometimes it mines, and fome times its clouded with an Eclipfe. It likewife change? its Place moving from Eaft to Weft, from one Tropick to another, fometimes it draws nearer to us, and fome Times goes farther from us, cauiing a longer Shadow, but theApoftle allures us, that the uncreated Father of Light has none -of thefe Alterations. And idly. Sometimes the Scriptures remove from God thofe Things that imply a Change, e. g. Repe?itance Num. xxiiL 19. God is not a Man that he Jhould lie, meither the Son of Man that he JJjould repent. 1 Sam. xv. 29. And alfo the Strength of Ijrael will not lie, nor repent, for he is not a Man that he jhould repent. 3 as he is All-fumcicnt, lie can fully fat-iffy their moft extenfivfc Spiritual Worfhip apply 'd. i 6 i sxteniive Defires. But on the Contrary, tho' earthly Enter* tainments may gratify our ienfhal Appeties, yet, becaufe of their grofs and elementary Nature, they cannot fatisfy, and do not fuit our Souls, neither in reipect of their Nature and Dignity, or their Defires -and Duration. It was there- fore exceeding fbolifh in the rich Man to lav to his Soul, in refpect of fuch Things, that it had much Goods laid up for many Tears. Such Entertainments can no more fatisfy the anxious Soul, than Hufks, Gravel-Stones, or the Eaft Wind can fatisfy the cravings of our Stomach ! And it is with great Juftice that the Scriptures afcribe fuch ignominious Epithets to all earthly Good, to fignify in the ftrongeft. Terms its infufficiency to content the Mind. 4thly. Is God a Spirit'? This fhews us then the ne- neceffity of Spiritual Wormip. This indeed is plainly ex- prefs'd in our Text. Such a Wormip is fuitable to the Na- ture of God, and will be only accepted by him. The jufmefs of this inference fome of the Pagans difcovered by the Dint of Natures Light. Cato Jtpeaka excellently about it in his Difticks, in the following Manner. Sideus ejlanimus iiobis ut carmina dicunt. Hie tibi precipue fit pur a mente colendus, i. e. If God is a Spirit, as the Poets inform us, then cur cheif Care, mould be to wormip him with a pure Mind. And feeing this fpiritual Wormip is the Touch-Stone of true Chriftianity, we mould be hereby enduced to exa- mine ourfelves with all Speed and Serioufnefs, whether we perform it or not, and that by an impartial and deliberate Application of what has been faid concerning it, in the doctrinal Part of this Difconrfe. N'owifupon Tryal we find the aforeiaid Characters of fpiritual Worship in us, we may and ought to rejoyce in Chrift Jefus, notwithstanding our many defects, becaufe we are compleat in him; Sincere Intentions are accepted for Performance^, efpecially when an- X opportunity i 6 2 7&.e.lwe m&ve /ind have our Bihig. As we could not at firft begin to exile without God, fo neither can we fob- ml a Moment, or think, or (peak, or act without him, who is the great Source of Being and Spring of Mo- tion ! And Athly. As God upholds every Thing by his Power, fb he governs. All by his fovtrcign wife and unerring Provi- dence in the bgit Manner, and to the nobleil End. •: His own Glory* Surely then the .End and Means conducing thereto, mint be known by him ; and indeed if the Kingdom of God did not rule over all, as the Scriptures aifert, all Nature would be in CoDiufion, the difcordant Elements would immediately break their prefent Harmony, and jum- ble into the wildeft Chaos, ■ and consequently dliibive in a tumultuous ail i c tenfive Ruin! The Innocenfe, the Lives, the Goods of intelligent Creatures would in itly be made an eafy Prey to n pacious Lnfts and refiirieis Violence ! The whole Globe would groan with a rain of fuccemye Tragedi , and ioon be ting'd with a crimfon Eloocl ! hly. Seeing the Almighty hath fixed a Deputy in our Bo- n , I mean C ce 3 wh< - sit is to I and \3 The Kinds of divine Knowledge. i 8 7 regilTer our whole Behaviour,, whole company we cannot fhun,, wliofe Cognizance we cannot efcape ! How much more then mufl the Almighty be acquainted with all our Ways? For he is greater than our Hearts, and knoweth all Things,, as the A- poftle John obferves. Again 6thly.- Methinks the Confideration of the general Judg- ment, gives additional Evidence to the afore faid. Truth, for how can Jehovah judge all, uniefs he knows all? The A- poftle anures us,. Rom.- ii. 16. That God will bring every J Fork into Judgment,, with every fecret Thing, whether it be Good, or whether it be Evil. Yea, Hifrory both facred and prophane inform us, ofGotTs briagingjfco publick Light crimlbn Evils, before vaii'd with the (Sustains of obfeureft Secrefy ! But I proceed to the 2d. propos'd y . which was to fpeak of the Kinds of divine Knowledge. And here I may obferve, that as it refpecls Creatures,, it is two Ibid, and: Either intuitive, or approbativc, or as ethers phrafe it, gene- ral or ipecial. Now God's general Knowledge, or his Know- ledge of Intuition is. that Property of the Almighty, where- by he only knows, or beholds all Things. In this Senfe it is faid Acts xv. 18. That known unto God. are all his Works from the Beginning of the World.- And 2aly. God's approbativc or fpecial Knowledge, is that divine Perfection, whereby Jehovah knows fo, as to ap- prove of, and delight in what lie knows ! Hence our Lord, ■'. vii. 22. commands the Wicked to depart from him, and tells them that he never knew them, that is fo as to approve of them. But I pais on to the 3d. Propos'd, which was to fpeak of the Properties of God's Knowledge- And iff. The Knowledge of God is mod Simple, inafmuch as- he beholds at once all Things in himfeif, without the Uie o£ any of thole Methods, whereby human Knowledge is ac~ A a 2. quir'd,. i 8 8 tfke Properties cf divine Knowledge. quir'd, viz. The Compofition of Things of the fame Kind, the 'Separation of Things of a different Kind, the compa- ring oi one Thing with another, and the inferring of one Thing from cnothcr. Hereby the human Mind proceeds gra- dual!) - in a Way of reafoning, from the Knowledge of Things more known, to the Knowledge of Things le!s known, but it is the Weaknefs of cur Undeiftandings, that renders thofe Meaiures neceilary, and therefore they cannot conflil with the Perfecton of the ilipream Being. If a Suc- ceflion in Duration be an Imperfection, .as was prev'd in a preceeding Sermon concerning -the Eternity of God, a Suc- ceflion in Knowledge mud be io likewiie : For as it ne- ceflarily infers Increaie of Knowledge by Observation and Experience, lb it as evidently fappoies preceeding Ignorance, which to afcribe to the Almighty is deteflabie Biai- phemy. And 2d'iy. The Knowledge of God is 'Indepmdenft, becaufe it is not in him as an Accident, ^nalily., or Idea, different and feparable from his E iler.ee, as it is in Creatures : For then he would be compounded of different Things, as Creatures are, and ib might in Time ceafe to be. No, his Simplicity ai- fures us, as I cbferv'd before, that his Knowledge is the very fame with his E fie nee, it is no other than God knowing, and therefore muft needs be independent. That the Ef- fence oi : God is independent, has been already proved in a preceeding Sermon. But to proceed 3uly. The Knowledge of God is Eternal* inafmuch as he neiir r begins, or ceafes to know, as the Things known by him begin or coaie to be in themielves. The 1-lcafon of which is, becaufe lie knows all Things by his own Ei- iencc or eternal Purpofes, and not by receiving Species, or Images, or Ideas from Objects without himieii', as Creatures do. Here obferve that two Things are required to conilitute The Properties cf divine Knowledge* i % a xonftitute the Knowledge of Creatures, viz. ift. The images or Ideas of Things. And idly, the Speculation of them, which implies the receiving of thole Ideas thro' the out- ward Senies by the Fancy and Contemplation cfthem be- ing receiv'd, which coniiirs partly in the Companion of 9L Compoiition, Diviiion, Affirmation, or Negation ; and part- ly in Deductions, or Reafonings, whereby we proceed front Things more known to Things lefs known. The Method of human Knowledge is by comparing, compounding, di- viding and ilibitraeting the Images of Things receiv'd } as alio by confidering their Connection and Dependance. and infering one Thing from another. But the Ideas of God are not borrow'd from outward Object s ? For if ib, Crea- tures mufl exiPc, before the divine Knowledge ; and then it would be temporary and finite, this cannot be without the Detraction of the divine Eifence. Two Things indeed are neceffary to the divine Knowledge in our Apprehenfion dis- tinct, viz. The Prelence of Ideas and the Perception of them, io that it may be thus defcnb'd to be a perfect Intuition of himielf or his own Ideas, but without any receiving of them from without, and without any Comparifon, Compoiition, Diviiion, or Inferences, as was obferv'd before, refpecting the Knowledge of Creatures, for all inch Things, do manifeilv involve Imperfection. Amefins in his Medulla faycth, " 'That u the Idea cf Gad, is no other than his very E fence, as " it is under food by him to be imi table, in the Creature, or fo " that the Image of that Perfection, may after fome fort be " twfrefs'd in Creatures." The Idea in a Man, is deriv'd from the Things themfelves, and therefore the Things mufl riric exiil in themfelves, then they approach our Senfes, and from thence to our Underiianding, where they confti- tute fome Idea to direct a following Operation; but the Idea of the Almighty is the Model or Pattern, which firft exiil s 3 i q o The Properties of divine Knowledge, exifts, according to which, Things in Time are exactly form'd, which Idea as it is abfoloutelv considered in Rela- tion to God, is but one, becaufe it is his Eflence 3 but as it is confidered reflectively,, it is manifold, becaufe it denotes many refpecls to the Creatures, fo that the Idea of one Creature, is not the Idea of another, Tims it appears that* Things are known by God as they are, and that there is a Connexion and Dependance among the divine Ideas. Whence fprings the Order of Prior and Poflerior, which we- obferve in Predestination and Providence ? It is doubtlefs on the Account of the Man ifeldnefs of the divine Idea, in the former Senfe, that his Knowledge receives various- Names j. in refpedt of the Truth ofTihifagsy; 'tis call' & Know- ledge, m refpedt of its Extent, 'tis call'd Qmnifciencc, in ref- pecl: of Paji Things 'tis calld Remembrance. (PJaf. xxv. 6, y.) In refpedt of apEefent/ Things Sig&t. [Heb. iv. 13.) In rei- pect of future Things Fere-Knowledge. (Rc;n. viii. 29.) In refpeel of the divine ordering of Things to a good End] f k'i9 called Wifibm^ in refpedt. of the. Knowledge of the moil fit and proper Seaibns for all Things, it is cali'd Prud:nce. But 4thly. The Knowledge of God is mmtkahlejh& knows not- one Thing mere than another^ neither does he know Things more now than formerlv, or more formerly than now ; be- caufe he beholds ail Things in his immutable EiTcnce or Pur- pofes, and in his Eternity, by which he exifts without any Succefhon in Duration., altogether unmov'd in all the differ- ent Periods of Time. $thly. The Knowledge of God' is Infinite perfect and' diftindf, he knows all Things without Sufpicion of Igno- rance or Error. His Knowledge is dtfti'nd: and particular, not confus'd and general. Hence it is laid, that when he had finished the Works of Creation, that he faw every Thing, and behold it was very good, that 'is, flii'ted to anfwer the The OhjeB of divine Knowledge. 191 the End intended for them, agreeable to the Idea or Plan refpediing them, which was from Ever! ailing in -his own Mind. Be/ides the Knowledge of God is certain and '.infallible^ without any Heiitation or Poflibility of Miftake : And therefore exceedingly differs from the Knowledge of Creatures, who can but guefs and conjecture at Things to come, according to the prefcnt Appearances, and probable Tendency of Things. This kit Property oftheJivine Know- ledge naturally leads to the 4th propos'd, which was to point to the various G.bjecls of the Knowledge of -God, the Con- lideratibn of which will be a farther Confirmation of it's in- finite Extent, by .an Induction of Particulars. And iff. God knows himfelf and his own infinite Mind. viz. What he has done, can do, or will do. Rom. xi. 34. For who hath known the Mind of the Lord, and who hath been his 'Counjciior, or who hath fir ft given to him f Here it is fup- pos'd, that tho' Creatures know not the Mind of God, yet he does himfelf, and of himfelf, without AfTiftance from others. Seeing it is an Excellency in an intelligent Crea- ture to know himfelf, tho' but in an imperfect Degree, therefore felf Knowledge in tho hipdieft decree of Eminence, mull be afcrib'd to the Almighty, who is infinitely perfect, and if io, then the Almighty muft needs know all Things, be- caufe they are included in his Power and Purpofe. 2cl!y. God knows all Things pofible. As the Power of >d is unlimited, he certainly can do infinitely more than he does, or will do. This extent of his Power he muft needs know, becauie he knows himfelf, the Almighty can -do ail Things that do not involve a Contradiction, e. g* He could create, if he pleafed, Millions 01 Worlds, and Millions of more Orders of Creatures in them than there be in this ! We ourfelves, as tree Agents, can do more than we do, and as intelligent Agents we know the Inflanccs where- in. G 192 ''The Obi eels of divine Knowledge: in : And how much more muft this be afcrib'd to God, who is infinite in Power, and calls the Things that are not as tho' they were ? When David enquired of God i Sam. xxiii. 12. Will Saul come down, and will the Men c/'Keilah deliver me up f The Almighty anjwered they will. Which fignifies that t,he Almighty knew they would, except they had been prevented by his Providence. This Knowledge of Things poflible, is call'd by Zanchy and others " The *' Science of Jimp k Intelligence." 3dly. The Almighty knows all Things that have been,, are, or fhall be.. This is call'd the Science of Vifon, which refpects the Exigence of Things, And ifi\ The Almighty knows all Things p aft , for they were once prefent, nay they may be faid, in propriety of Speech, to be now prefent to God, becaufe he has no Succefiion in Duration, one Day is with him as a Thoufand Years, and a Thoufand Years as one Day. To fuppofe that the Almighty forgets any Thing, is in other Words to fay that his Know- ledge is leis perfect than it was, which cannot confifi: with infinite Per fed ion. And 2d!y. God knows all Things prefent, which the Reafen? before offered to prove the Infinity of his Knowledge iurri- ciently confirm. Seeing all Things depend upon his Power and Providence, they mr.il be known by him, for his Know- ledge and Power cannot be fbparated. 3dly. God likewile knows all things future, or to come, whether they are produced by a necefLry Caufe, fuch as Fire or Water; or a voluntary Caufe, fuch as Men who act by rational Complacency, or a contingent Caufe, which by its Nature, or in it Self, is not determin'd to this or that Effect. The many Proprieties of the Prophets concerning Events, many Ages before they came to pals, fuflicienfiy confirm this Truth. It was well obferv'd by Tertullian againft The ObjecJs of divine Knowledge I 93 again ft Marc ion y " That the fore Knowledge of God, has as M manyWitnefes, as he has made Prophets." Was not Ju- das's betraying our Lord an Effect of a voluntary or free Caufe ? And yet this was prophefied of. (John vi. ult. Acts iv. 28.) Of the like nature was Ifraels Oppreflion in Egypt, and yet this was foretold Four Hundred Years before it came to pais. (Gem xv. it,.} Was not Jofcpb's Advancement a contingent and very improbable Event, and yet it was made known feveral Years before it came to pais by his Dream. (Gen. xxxvii. 5.) What could be more contingent than Abafrs Death by a Random-mot, and yet this was foretold before lie- entred the Field of Battle, r Kings xxii. ly, 34. Things are faid to be contingent and accidental, becaufe they happen or come to pafs unexpectedly to us,, without our Defign or Knowledge, and becaufe the Caufes that produce them, are not in themfelves neceilarily deter- min'd to produce iuch an Effect ; but nothing can come to pafs without fehovah's Cognizance, and Purpoie. And hence the Scriptures inform us, that the moil minute Events, fall within the Care and Compafs of his Providence, which ex- tends it felf to themoft inconfiderable Creatures, a Sparrow cannot jail to the Ground, without our Fathers Permimon.,, and the very Hair s of our tie ad are numbered. Mat. x. 2-9, 10. The Time would fail, if I mould relate all the Prophefies mentioned reipectingCiiRisT. I (hall therefore rather choofe to- obferve, in Addition to what has been faid, that Almighty God knows all that concerns intelligent Beings in particular,. as may appear by the following Instances, viz,. ift. He knows all their Anions Pf. cxix. 168. For aUmf Ways are before thee. There is r.o Darknefs or Shadow of Death r where the Workers of Iniquity may hide themfelves.. B h 2 dly;. 1 94 ^ oe Ofy e ff s °f divine Knowledge. 2dly. He knows all our Words, Plal. cxxxix. 4. For there is not a Word in my Tongue, but lo, O Lord, thou knoweji it altogether, 3dly. He knoweth our Hearts, this he claims as his pe- culiar Prerogative, ifau. iL 23. And all the Churches Jl: all know that I am he that fearcheth the Reig?zs and Hearts. He knows the Thoughts of the Heart : Hence he is faid to know them afar off, i. e. From Eternity ^ as Divines gene- rally interpret -, and hence he is likewife faid to tell unto Alan his Thoughts, Amos iv. 13. He knows the Imaginati- on of the Thoughts of the Heart. Gen. vi. 5. And God faw that the Wickednefs of Man was great on the Earth, and that every Imagination of the thoughts of his Heart was only Evil continually. By the Imagination of the Thoughts, we may underfland Thoughts in their Embryo not fully form'd. He knows the Intention of the Heart, Heb. iv. 12. And is a difierner of the Thoughts and Intents of the Heart. He knows the Bent of the Heart, Hof. 1 1 . j. And my People are bent to Back-fiiding from me, though they call'd them to the mojl higl\ none at all would exalt him. And the Knowledge God hath of what has been mention'd, and of every thing elfe, is certain and evident. Hence Zanchy pertinently obferves. " That Knowledge by " the Underflanding, is either Opinion, Faith or Science. " Opinion, faith he, is neither a certain or evident Knowledge \ " but Jo affents to the affirmative or negative Fart that it " Doubts concerning the other. Faith, lays he, is a certain, " but not evident Knowledge ! (Heb. xi. 1.) but Science is