?^a; \i!>' m ■!^S^ 4 m A*i Mtii n ^'^-'".^M^y^ ■^A- fif^f^S^. ^^'^^^-X ^ -/ -^^3^^ ^ ^m^j^cr9^n^^0ibmm- AN ESSAY On the feveral Dispensations of GOD to Mankind, in the Order^ in which they lie in the Bible : O R, A Short System of the Religion of Nature and Scripture : WITH A PREFACE, fhewing the Caufes of the Growth of Infiddity, and the likeliell Method to put a Stop to it. AND AN APPENDIX, proving , that God adopted Abraham to the Inheritance of eternjti Life, Cen. xii. ;, 5. xxii. I7j iS.-r-^i f^\ k.yH^ ■ ■ ■ \ God who at SUNDRY T I M E S^ * A xN D IN D I V fill S MANNERS, fpake unco the Fathers by the Prophets, hach in thefe hft Days fpoken unto us by his Son, Uib. i. i, z. ADA M, who was THE SONOFGOD, Luke iii. 58. The SONS OF GOD faw the D AU G HTE R S OF MEN, Gen. vi. 2. T.;ey which are of Faith, the fame are the CHILDREN OF ABRAHAM, Gdl. iii. 7. Ifracl is my S O N, even my firft BORN, {Exod. iv. 22.) — Saying, unto thee will I give the Land of C A N A A N, the Lot ot ycur INHERITANCE, PfaLcv. 11. Ye are the CHILDREN or the PROPHETS, ABf iii. 25. VearcALLiheCHILDRENOFGODBYFAITHiN CHRIST JES US, Gal. iiK26. And it ye be CHRIS T's, then are ye A B R A H A M's SEE D, and Heirs according to the Promife, Gal. iii. 29. And are I he Sons of God, being the SONS OF THE RESUR- RECTION, Luke XX. 56. Behold what Ma-r.er of Love the Father hath beftowed upon us, that we Ihcu d be called the Sons of God. — Beloved, now are we the S)ns 01 God, and it doth not yet appear what we fliall be; but we know, THAT WHEN HE APPEARETH, WE SHALL BELIKE HIM, I John iii. i, 2. •LONDON, rriuttd for J. Gray, at the Crofs Keys in the Poultry. i7iS. tv Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2011 witii funding from Princeton Tlieologic^l Seminary Library littp://www.arcliive.org/details/essayonseveraldiOObarr THE PREFACE. T' feems to he a pre^Dailing Opi^ nion, that T)eifm gets Ground a?nong thinking and cirtmus Men ; notwithftanding many excellent TraUs that ha've ap- peared of late in defence of Chriftianity^ by bringing together the exter- nal 'Evidence there is for it^ and fiipporting it againfl the Exceptions that ha've been made to that Evidence. It irmft needs be very fit for believers to confidcr^ what niay he the Caiifes of fo ft range and threatning an Appearance ; fincc the be- ing thoromjoly apprizd cf the Caife of the Grozvth of Infidelity^ can alone direU ns to the hefi Method to prevent it, A ^ I iv The Preface. I am fenfihle^ T'here are fome, who wilt think much Enqtiiry ahoiit this Matter alto- gether needle fs ; fatisfying themfehes with refohing the Growth of T>eifm into God's de- liifliculty, Inflead of that Affiftance, we ha've many r mnecejjary T)ifficulties flung in our way- Seve^ viii The Preface. Se'vercil of the Matrons of 'Ret' elation have laid more weight upon it than it can hear. For whereas Ket^elation^ as it was dcVrjered hy Tatriarchs or Trophets^ hy Chrifi or his Jpojiles^ was only propofed in Aid of natural 'Religion^ and recommended as highly nfefttl ; many fine e hat'e infified^ that it is ahfolutely fieceffary ; not barely to gj've tis a l^itle^ on which we may claim eternal Life^ as eternal Life is defcrihed in Scripttire^ {which may he juftly [aid according to the iJoUrine of Re've- lation) hut to fecitre Men from eternal T)am- nation^ and to obtain any degree of the Famiir of God in another World* lint as foon as 'perjons^ to whom Revelation is recommended as thus ahfohitely neceffary^ come to fec^ that it is not fo^ nor cant he fo y as they Joonwill ; it may I'ery eafily happen^ that they will not trouble their Heads any more about it ,• and finding the Opinion^ that it is ahfohitely ne~ cejfary^ a great Extreme^ may, withozit think- ing further J {as indeed they ought) run into another^ {as is hut too common in thefe Cafes ^ and think it entirely nfelefs. Other Jd'-jrcates for Revelation^ who have tinderjlood it better than the former^ have in- deed pleaded for it only as nfeful \ but many of them in explaining the main Ufe it is of^ have not fbewn wherein its great Ufefulnefs cojififts^ as the Jpofiles always did* I mufi needs fay , / cannot but think the rational divines ^ as they are called^ very fatdty mi 2 this The Preface. ix this Head i not to mention others. For the}\ having confidered Revel at i on ^ as de- ftgned to do nothings hut to gii'e a frejjj Pub- lication of natural Religion^ make it of little TJfe now to any hut the Mob {whattz'er it might he of at the Teriods in which it was made) nor of any great Vfe to them neither^ *Biit et^ery one will eafily [ee^ that the Jinking the Vfe of Rez'elation Jo low^ is no z'oays fiiit- able to all the Apparatus of Revelation : Efpe^ daily of the lafi and mofi perfeU Ret^elation which God made by his Son ,• who in order thereto took Flejh^ died on the Crofs^ rofefrom the ^ead^ and afcended into Heaven^ and had all Tower conferrd upon him^ till the Coijfummation of all T^hings, The pecidiar T)oBrines of Re 'v el at ion can jiecer be the du- ties of natural Religion ^ as they have been too much fuppofed to he by thefe T>i'vines ^ hut UDo^rines to afjift us to perform them. In what way Revelation does this^ will he the ^ufinefs of the following BJfay i and thither therefore the Reader mnft he referrd; in the mean Time this Miftdke i^and which unhap- pily for Re'velation has been but too cominon) perhaps has had almoft as bad an EffeU as the former i and made thofe to whom Revela- tion has been only recommended by a 'very low^ or by an intirely mifplaced Ufefidnefs^ from feeing it to be of little Confequence^ or its UJe- fulnefs wrong placed^ either to rejed Revela- tion^ or at leaf think no farther about it» a J X The Preface. leant hut think tcc^ that 'Revelation has fi'.fferd very much from a too partial Confide- ration of it. When ohfercing Men fee the Ma- trons of Ke-veUtion apply themfekes zoholly to the Explication and l^efence of Chrifti- anitjj they prefcntly conclude^ that the Pa- trons oftbofe iJoUrines have hi.t an iudijfei'ent Opinion of the Old Tefiament^ and that 'tis for that Reafon^ thty dont fet themfelves to confider it. Whereas Chrifjanity is bin the I aft Link in a Chain of Truths that corfifts of fever al others, Jnd he that pretends to fl?ew a Chain vf Truths mtft fhew not one Link on- ly^ hut fever al j and fjew that they are link- ed with the firft^ and with one ancther, 'But yet Revelation has faffered much more from ancther Quarter than any of thefe that I have already mentioned. For though no Kmwledge^ as has he en already ohfcrved^ can he fuppos^d to come from God^ as the Gover- nor if the Worlds that is not of common TJfe and Advantage to Mankind^ yet Pretences to Revelation being fo capable of ferving pri- vate and felfifj Ends^ {utterly incorftftent with all Happinejs that is as high and unmix d as we are capable of and mtift laft as long as our Beings^ or that may add to the Happintfs of others ) Men of ambitious and covetous Minas have net cnly in all Jges pretended to Revelations^ which they never had^ in order to accoynplijjj their hafe and wicked ^efigns ,• hut have [o mifeprefented the Revelation th,.t The Preface. xi that is from Qod^ as to mnlze it more incou" fiftent with all the CharaUers and Ends of a di-tine Revelation^ than any of the count erf sit Ke-jelations^ that have gaind Credit in any Age of the World, Theje Men hace dehafed Revelation from being the moft rational and tfeful Tiifcovery , into one that is ahmji equally ah far d^ and more perniciotts^ than any other religious Forgery or Impofture iz'hat- foever : Whereby they have made fme 'well dijpofed Men net only rejeU it ^ but become keen and higotted againfl it, Tihe Jpoftles laid no fuch ft^imbling Wochs in the Way of thofe who were difpofed to receive Revelation, They were free from all Enthttfiafm^ utter d no Jargon^ taught no Abfurdities and Contra- di'clions : They usd no Charms^ or Spells^ added no idle Fopperies to Religion, nor any coftly T)ecGrations : Nor pretended to any nfurp'd opprefjive Towers to fupport it: Much lefs did they pretend^ that the whole of Revelation was made up of thefe^ or of any one of them. They renounced all thefe Things^ and every other hidden Art of T>i%onefiy^ calculated onk to raife an high Ijominaticn^ Tower and Trofit to themfckes^ or to any be- lievers that were to follow thew.^ on the Ruins of the Senfe^ Freedom and Property of others. On the other Hand^ they recommended Reve- lation to their Hearers^ by teaching clearly the unfophifticated Word of God -, accompani- ed by the T)emonf ration of the Spirit^ and of a 2 Tower i xii The Preface. TcW€r .; avd by approving themfelves, through the greateji Humility^ Meeknefs^ i>iUgeiice^ Courage^ Tatience and Siiccefs ^ to every Man's Confcience, in the Sight of God. l^hefe T^hings which 1 ha've mentioned ap- pear to 7ne to he the 'Difficulties that prevent the 'virtuous Deifts from receimng Revelati- on^ either as thofe Difficulties arife from Re- ^Delation it felf^ as it is now circumjiancd^ or from the Mijiakes its Tatrons have made in recommending^ or in explaining it. We have mw indeed the ^ible before us, and may thereby clear Revelation from all thefe Mi- fiahs ; we may fee on what Foot it recom- mends itfelfto our Confideration^ and what it really is. "But here Men meet with Difficul- ties in themfehes, and which are far from being lejjened by the Mifreprefentations I have piji now mentioned. For it is certain, that to get at the true Senfe of the 'Bible, as it is a coijjtfient Syflem of ufefiil Knowledge^ there muji go great Leifiire, Care and Ability, And yet ftill Revelation is rejeUed by fome Well difpofed Men, who want none of thefe, without fo much as looking into it : The Rea- fon of which is, that they tale it for granted, that that is the View and the Scnfe of Reve- lation, which fome of its Trofejfors and In- terpreters have put upon it. It is certain this is far from being any Infiance of their good Difpofttions, However, whilji from thcfe Mifreprefentations^ they think it either ^ifelefs The Preface. xiii iifelefs or pernicious^ they will perhaps think tbemfehes under no more OUigation^ or find no more Inclination to fttidy the 'Bihle^ or attend to the E'vidence there is for the Truth of it^ than they feel within themfehes to fiudy any vther idle Enthttjiafm or Recwie, or any Tiece of Impojiiire or Forgery ,• or to attend to the E'vidence that may he offer d in behalf of them. If they go fo far^ under thefe TrejudiceSy as to look into the Bible -, yet it is odds^ if they doiit read it^ in order to fortify thefe *Prejudices, It is fill greater Odds if when they go to ftudy the 'Bible ^ they entirely dit^efi themfehes cf them-, and read it with the Spi- rit of Candor and Equity, And it is yet the great eft Odds of all^ if they read it with that Attention and critical Skill that is necejfary to under ft and any Viece of Antiquity^ and particularly the Bible ; part of it being the moft ancient Book that is prejervd to us, that can receive little foreign Afjiftance towards the under ft anding any Thing of it^ and that can have no foreign Affiftance at all, in rela- tion to the peculiar Matter of it. And I take this (viz. the not ftudying the Bible in a cri- tical ifay) to be one of the greateft Caufes of the Growth of IDeiftn among thoughtful and i)irtuoiis Men. I mean of th [e Caufes which arife from within themfehes. And I think it will appear to be fo, if we confult the Ilifto- ry of the Learned, For we JJoall find, that "^ fome xiv The Preface. fome of the greateft Men, and the freeft En-^ quirersy who ha've ftiidied the 'Bible in this Way^ ha've attained the greateft Underjiand- ingj ha've had the moft fteady Belief and ex- freffed the highefi Admiration of the Scrip- tures : Such as Erafmus, Grotias, J. G. Vof- fius, Eocke, Newton, MoylCjCJ^r. whilft others^ who ha've not ftudied it in this Way, from no- minal Belie'vers ha^je become fettled T)oitbters or Unhelieoers , efpecially if fome other Things ha've conciirrd -, as if they ha've been of un-- attenti've or narrow Minds, or have not been md to fo great a Compafs of Thought as Cri- ticifm requires : If they ha've been us'd to firiU T^emonftration in Tarts of Learning that are capable of it^ efpecially in natural 'Religion; and are thereby much difpcfed to doubt of every Thing, that has hut probable or moral 'Evidence to fupport it : If from obferving the pious Frauds that fo early took Tlace, and the bad Lives of ftich as would be thought its befi Trofeffors, which ftill continue, they add to their fceptical T>ifpofition^ T)iftruft^ Sufpicion, and Jea- ioufy. All thefe-i I think, flwuld be confiderd as an unhappy Turn of Mind, that dijpofes Men to reliJJo T)eifm ; efpecially when they have been ftrongly diftafted at Kevelation^ by the grofs Mifreprefentations of it ^ which I have jtift now mentioned. Theje fever al Caufes conftitute fo many dif- ferent Ranh and Cl^JJes of 'virtuous and thought-'^ The Preface. xv thoughtful ^eifts ; which if we covfider thus particularly^ may fnrniJJo tis with wore jufl Notions of them^ and with better Methods to recoz'er them^ than if we flmild only confider them in the Lump. As to the Cafe of thofe nominal Ueifts^ who are fo^ from being per- fcUly hcedlefs and unthinking^ loofe and c/- tioits^ it is of a eery different Confider at ion ^ is not within our Inquiry^ and befides^ has no ^ijHcidty attending it, I have thought it^ for fome Reafons not fo proper hitherto to dijiinguiflj thcfe^ who re- jeU Rec elation^ from thofe who dont embrace it^ or the real ^eifts from the Scepticks, Tet I think tt isbelief of it^ fpread fo far^ or produce the Frtiits we daily fee^ who will not fet himfelfto reWfy e'very Mifreprefentation that has been made of it. And let not him that will not fet himfelf about this great Work in good earneft ,• and abo But I fmfi own^ that though among thofe which have fallen in my Way ^ I have feen fever al^ to which j I be- lieve^ the Growth cf T)eifm may be jitftly at- tributed^ in this prying Jge, from their great Inconfiftence with Reafon and Revelation; yet I have not met with any that has^ in my Jpprehenfion^ clofely follow d the prevailing Notion, The Preface^ xix Notion, the Method^ cr the L,angtiage of the 'Bihle. And yet it is certain^ that none bttt^ one that does-, can even from the Form ofit, he calculated to anfwer the good End propofed ; e-ven if the Matter of it was' ne'ver fo conjiftent with J or agreeable to the T>oUrines of the 'Bible, In order to reprefent the Senfe of the "Bibk^ feiwral Authors have run into a figurative or metaphorical T>ivinity : And among them^ fome have not been wanting to purfue thefe Figures in a very wild and offcnfive Manner. Metaphors and Allegories^ indeed^arejufily and beautifidly ufcd in the poetical and rhetorical Books of Scripture ; but thofe Figures them^ f elves at beji always ward a Key ; inftead of opening the Senfe that is couclod under them. Others have run into abftraUed and meta- phyfical Notions 'y which when they are not founded in the Nature of Things^ f^ich as the Schoolmen usd^ are ridicidous : And when they arey yet are not of a Tiece with the Scripture 5 which generally reprefent s things by no other Ideas^ than fuch as are the moji common and familiar to us ; as being alone fuited to the bulk of Mankind^ for whofe Be-^ nefit it is defigned, Oth^rSy indeed^ have reprefent ed the Scheme of Revelation under Notions that are common (ind familiar^ and that are fcriptural too: " ' ' ' h % But XX The Preface. ^itt then they are ftich^ as are either only topical, that is t9 fay^ ns'd in particular Texts of the "Biole ^ or clfe fuch as are mily fuited to particular ^Periods and ^ifpenfati^ ens. Under this Head^ to pafs by other Sy^ ft ems ^ thofe {which haz-e been of the be ft Z)^- fign^ may he rangd, which haz^e treated 2)/- miity under the Nation uj a Coz'enant^ of a Kingdom y or of the Chriftian Church. Thofe who ha've writ Syftems of rcveard 'R.eligion in any of thefe Methods ^ha^ue^ he fides the Faults peculiar to each of them , been guilty of one that has been common to them all -^ mamelyy that they haie compos'' d them accord- ing to the Rules .^ in which the Syftems of ether Jrts and Sciences are drefsd tip : 'But this Method can never make thofe Syftems of a apiece with a Kez'elation which has been deli'jerd to Mankind in quite another Man^ And though fever al 'Divines have avoided thefe mijtaken Methods.^ when they ha've handled particular SuhjeUs of Divinity -^ the Scriptures ha'ving been eery carefully ft udied- of late in a juft and critical Wayy to the great Honour of the prefent Jge^ and in zi'hich feme have otit-fljin d all that have gene before them;, yet we have not been favour d with a ftniftfd Tisce of this Kind^ or fo much as with a Sketch of it ^ Thofs The Preface. xxi 7'bofe who hd've come the neareft to "johat I aim at^ and who ought to hace great Merit with all who Jiudy their "Bible ^ are the "Di- fvines who hai'e coiifidered 'Revelation hifto- rically ^ the Way in which Kei'elaticn has leen con-teyed to Mankind, "But then fitch n^ifcoiirfes as thefe are to he confiderd only as Hijiories : TVhich will indeed he of great life to him that will ojfer a fcriptural Syfiem to the Worlds hut are not that Syfiem it [elf -^ nor may not ecen help thofe^ who compofe thcm^ or are inftriiBed by them^ to the Notion on which that Syftem mnji he hiiilt. 'But the Tiece or Sketch I aim at is fuch an one^ as will JJ?ew the Jingle Notion that runs through the fez^eral Uifpenfaticns of God to Mankind in its full Lights {if it fhall ap- pear that there is fuch a Notion) and that purfues it in the precife Order and Manner in which it was exhibited in thofe fe-veral ^if- penfaticns^ and will at the fame Timefljew\ how all the peculiar T)oBrines of Revelation refer to it. For fuch a Tiece or Sketch alone will dif cover to us all the Beauties of revealed T^ruth j fljewing it in its proper Ccnnexion and' Relations^ (particularly its TJfe and Advan- tage) and in its Unity ^ the firongeft inter- nal Evidence^ that can accompany it. How well foever therefore others have de- fer ved in their fever al Provinces , yet ftill^ oh- ferving the great Ufe as well as the Want of fiiclh XXll The P R E F A G E^ fuch an Undertakings as Iha'ue jufl now men^ tioned^ I ha've been led to offer a rough draught of this Kind to the Tiihlic ; in hopes it may receive Jjnendments from others, if it he capable of it i or that it may ingage thofe of greater Leifure and Ability , when they fling this azvay, to fuhjiitute a better in ths Koom of it^ The great A cut one fs of the Age, and par- ticularly cf a diflinguijh'd Writer in it, has fimiijhed fezcral OhjeUions againft Re'velati- on, which in flead of the T>ifcoiintenanc e of Tower, require the befi Attention of thofe, who are moft firmly perfwaded of its 'Truth and Advantage. 'But if the fiber T)eifis were d/fpofed to deal fairly with the Chrifti- an Religion, they would gi've us their Scheme cf Infidelity, as well as their ObjeUions againft the true Scheme of Re'velation ; that fo We might take a comparatii^e View of them, and JJoew the great T)ifproportion both cf E-vidence and Objc'ciion againft the one and the other. Indeed it muft he ownd, that the T>eifts have not been wholly wanting to our jiift Ex- peUations in this Particular. They ha've at haft flung out a general Hypothefits or two of l^eifm, how little fuet'er they hace fupported them. Tb.ey have firft prst ended ^ that thofe. wIm The Preface. xxiii who hm'e hdiidcd thefe fuppcjed Re-velations to p.Sy Were errwH Cheats. This has been the more avcTz'ed Opinion of the Eiieniles of Ret' elation^ till of late -, when finding thcm^ fehes beat out of this Hypothefs^ by feeing that this would not agree Z'^ith the Matter of Re- tvclation^ or with the clearefi Hifiory of thofe who ha've deli^^erd it ; they ha've with wore Siibtilty betaken themfelves to another; pretending^ that the Writers of the Books of the Old and New Tefiament were meer En» thtifiafts^ or Terfons who jiidgd thcnfekes ilhnnnated or infpired without being foo Though it will be founds on a careful Confi- deration of the Matter ^ that the UDeiJis (whether they therrfehes fee it or no~) flay be^ tween thefe two Hypothefes^ fljifting from one to the other ^ and blending them^ inconfiftent as they are, together. It has been extreamly well obfcr'ved^ by a Writer of a fine Tafie in this CcntrO'verfy^ that Enthiftafm nez^er deals much in FaUs : On which howei-er all the Jevviih as well as the Chriftian Re^^elation is wholly built. 'But let lis try this Matter by another Touchftcne, which will better fer^e our prefent Turpofe ; for we are conjidering^ whether the whole if Ro'velation be 'Enthiflafm^ and not whether one or two great Branches of Rec elation only be fo or no. Now Entlnftafm, in tbe Nature of the Things can ha've no Unity* And let the Teijis XXIV The P R E F A G t. TieiftsJJjew m in FaU^ if they ca% a Set of enthiifiadic Writers [who if they are at all intelligible) are at Unity with any confider- able Kimher of their Tredeceffors^ in for- mer Jges; or fo much as a Jingle Enthujiafly that is confiflent with himfelf^ through ma-- iiy Volumes^ or ecen through one Jingle Vo^ liime^ or it may he^ one might fay^ a Jingle ^age of their enthuJiaftAc Performances, If it Jhall appear then^ that there is one worthy and noble ^ejign furfued through the ^ooks of the Old and New T^eftament^ by one wife^ flain and fimple Mean^ though they had For- ty or more different Authors^ and were not Written in kfs than Jixteen Hundred Tears ; it will amount to the cleareji l^emonjlration^ that the 'Bible cannot be the Work of Enthu- Jiafts^ writing in different Jges. And will not every one then fee^ that it muji be from Uim^ who exijis through all Ages^ and fees what is pafi^ prefent^ and to come : Who has always the fame View^ mtift have fixd on the wifeft Methods to attain it, and yet mufi fuit his 'Difco'veries to the different Circum' fiances of thcfe^ to whom he makes them ^ if their Circttniftances 'vary from each other ^ as they muji in a TraU of many Ages be fup~ poid to do. If ary one JJoould fay^ that the Writers of the Old and New I^ejiament hace thought cf fome 'Probabilities , and then couch'' d them in dark-, general and indeter- minate The Preface. xxv minate Expreffioiis^ capahle of behig^ diffe- rently accommcdated and apply d ; and that fiicceeding Writers hace covfulted the jurmer^ and endea'vcurd to imitate them in fnch darh^ general and indeterminate Bxprefjions^ izith an intent^ not only that they might be different- ly accommodated and applfd in fiLtnre ^imes^ but alfo that they might bear fome Re- lation to former "Books -y Ifay^ he that pi etends to alledge this, entirely quits the Hypcthejis of Enthtijiafm^ in order to o-verthrow Rece- lation, and has recoiirfe to the exploded By- pothefis of Impoffure. For reprefenting the Writers of the Old and New Teftament to hace aUed as the T)eifts in this Fiew fup- pofe them to have dune^ is reprefenting them mt as hot' headed^ mad Enthufiafls^ whOy horn a'way with their prefent Imptdfe^ nether flop to confider any T^hing^ informer Writingj^ or their own ) but as the moft cooUheaded^ defigning Knaz'es, The one T)ejign I have mentioned ^ as rzin- ning through the "Bible ^ Itake^ with all other Writers on this Subje'ci^ to be the difplayivg the Glory of all God's TerfeUions^ particur- larly his moral TerfeUions j or v)hich will come to the fame Things to affiji oirr Reafon in purfuing our own Happinefs^ and promo- ting the Happinefs of others^ as long as our "Being laftsy and as long as we have other Beings about us. I take this T)efign to be c ittii" xxvi The Preface. nniformly furfited by one wi/e^ plain and Jim- fie Mean^ Tlot or Contmwce^ calculated to fir ike ez-ery Man^ that has the Ufe of his Reafon i though there are 'various Underplots^ if I may he allcdod to ufe thefe ExpreJJions^ to fupport the main One^ fnited to the Incidents of Man- hnd^ and heautifully related and proportion- ed to each other : Which^ as far as I knoWy has not heen taken notice of. Now, iffuch a ^efign, thus purfued^ Jhall appear evidently to run through the "Books of the Old and New T^efiament, a Man may with infinitely great- er Tropriety^ fipp^fi the moji perfeU IDrama (where the fineji 'JDefign is carried on by the left chofen Tlot^ and by the moJi confiftent Un- derplot s^ and beautiful w&ll proportion d In- cidents') to hai:e been writ by a Number of the greatejt Madmen or Icieots, by Tiece- weals^ in different Ages ^ than to imagine a Ifhread of fuch an End and Mean running through above forty Writers in mre than fix" teen Hundred Tears, to be the Work of fo many JEnthiifiafts, Or we may as zsell fuppofe the World to be framed by w.esr Chance, or.^ which will ftrih all but philofophical Minds more^ the nrft magnificent^ beautijul and convenient ^Palace, that the Imagination can figure to it felf, to be built by Men unacquainted with all the Rides of Archil eUure , in fester al Ages ^ and without any Model to build by, ai'd to be, fupportcd by meer Chance, through as many more The Preface. xxvii wore ^ges, as to imagine fiich an Unity of "Deji^n and Mean^ as I hace defcrihed^ to he the Refiilt of Entbti/iafin and Jccident rnixd together, 1 ha'i'e already hinted at fome Confiderati- ons^ that fl?ew the Hypotbefis of Forger]\ hy •which fome T)eifts ha've eudeat'oured to ac- count for Re-velation to he a eery ahfiird one. $tit let lis farther examine that Hypothefis of Revelation hy this Unity isohich I have jufi new obfervd to run through it. And here I would defire the T^eifts to confider, how hard and dijfcidt it is to ohferve Unity in any ^iece of meer FiEficn, where the Writer aims at Unity with the clofeft Intention, This ws 7nay eafily learn from the dramatic Writers of all Kinds J efpccially if their Tlot he all Fi^ion and not Story ^ who though they haie this Unity ever in View^ yet often depart from it : Js we may eafdy jee hy reading them^ or at leaft hy reading thofe who gi've us their Criticifms upon them. And let any one^ who is ufed to Italian or Merchants Accompts ( as they are called ) fee whether they can ever de^ part in the leaft from Trztth in them^ without feeling that ^Departure themfelces^ or jl?ewing it to it hers that narrowly infpe'ci then: j though the departure he not fuch as vitiates the Ac- compt^ or hinders the whole Ledger from he- ing exaUly hallancd at lajt , and where there' fore of Coiifequence the Accompt rr.uft he true- c 2 Now xxviii The Preface. Now if it he fo difficult to olferve Unity in a FiUion or FalJImd ^ or where there is a great "Degree of FiUion attending it, even in any Jingle dramatic performance, though the Author applies himfelf to ohferve it nc'ver fo carefully ; and if it he fo impof- fihle to mix any , e'ven the leaf; Falflmd, with the "Truth of Accompts, without that Falfhood's appearing plainly, though it is not fuch as deftroys the "Ballance of the ^ook, {fo little will Truth and Falflmd e'ver agree ^ how can any one ijnagine the 'Books of the Old and New Teftament to he Forgery^ any 77iore than Enthujiafm -, when nothing hut Unity and Agreement appears in fuch a Numher of Jfriters at fo great diftavce of Time from each other ? And that not only in the Main^ hit ( when all jufi Alkwances are made for Books circum- ftancd as they are) even in the 'Detail of T articular s, Thus^ in ray Opinion, it appears, that fuch a Sketch as I ha^'e 'mentioned^ is the heft JFay to explain Revelation^ and to fiip- port it] till a ftniJJod 'Piece cf the fame Tjefign fjall appear* And 1 wifj^ if any great Ma/ler Jhall go about it , he would particularly fet the Proportions of Revela^ tion in fuch a Light , as that their Ex- \elAlK-^'f aUnefs r> Beauty and -Bmsdw-^ might ft r ike I ever^ one that cafts bis Eye on it* And hy The Preface. xxix hy the proportions of Re'velation, I mean not mly thofe Proportions^ which appear in €ifpenfation of God to Mankind^ conjiderd apart, and hy it felf ; hit in the federal T>ifpenfations, as they hear a 'Relation to each other ' In order to explain my Mean- ing the hetter ahotit thefe Proportions^ I will give an Inftance of fome which are mry confiderahkj in the Second Corollary, at the End of this Ejjay. If this rough Dratight of Revelation hring Men to lay afide their Prejudices againji it, and emhrace it, at a Time when it undergoes fo JiriU a IDifqiiifiti" en, it will anfwer all I defign hy it, he [ides the InJiniUion and SatisfaUion (^ my own Mind. I thought once to have delayed the Tnh- lication of the EJJay , till I had fnijhed fome Notes I have hy me, the hetter to ex- plain and fupport federal Jffertions in it ; and which, I believe, it will fometimes he thought to want, I chofe to caft what I chiefly defign d for that Turpofe into Notes, where the Troof from Scripture would he corfequential and not direU , the hetter to preferve the Thread of the T)ifcourfe. 'But as I have not the Leifure at prefent^ that is neceffary to fnifj them, I have rcfoivd to fuhmit this Effay without the Notes, to the View of the 'Public, in hopes that, as Things XXX The Preface. Things ftand^ it may he of fome Service to it, 1 am 'very fenfihle that this is a 1)efign of a great Compafs and T>iffictdty, If any ^xprejfion therefore has drop'd from me ^ through too ckfe an Attention to the Mat- ter^ and 'where I hai'e not had the Aid of former Writers^ that is lefs accurate or prectfe , 7 hope the Candor of the Reader will excnfe it ; and make e'very proper and reafonahle Jllo-wance^ that may he due to an Undertaking cf this Nature^ or the frequent Interruptions of the Jnthor. There can he hut little Ufe in knowing an Jnthors Reafins for printing, at the lime he does , rather than at another. If the performance he worth any Thing, it is ne- c'er altogether out of Time ; if it he worth nothing, it can ne^cr he in Seafon, How^ ever, to fatisfy the Ciiriofity of him that may ask the Qiieftion, I will only fay, that thefe Tapers have lain hy me a great ma- il)) Months-, in hopes I ynight fee thofe Thoughts in a hetter 'Drefs from fme ahler Hand, now that Revelation is under f care- fnl a Confideration. Tarticnlarly I expe'ci- ed they might have he en fiiperfeded hy fome Account I had of Tiollor BiirnetV BoyieV LeUtires, Hut heing difippointed not only hy others, hut hy him in this 'Particular {though I am glad of an Opportunity of re- turning The Preface. xxxi turning him my Thanh for fo far exceed- ing onr reafonahle ExpeBaficws in mc^ny others^) I refoked to fichmit this Effay to the Examination of the Friends of Tnttby and of that free Enquiry^ which is the on^ ly Way to attain Trtitb, <^M^. A N A N ESSAY On the feveral DISPENSATIONS O F G O D to Mankind, As they lye in the Bihk. N Order to give a diftindl Ac* count of the various Methods, in which God has extraordi- narily difcovered himfelf to Mankind (which have been fit- ly enough called his Difpenfations towards them) it will be necelTary to trace them up to that, which is the firft of them, and which naturally leads to all the reft. By the Methods in which God has ex- traordinarily difcover'd himfelf to Mankind^ B " I 5 An Eflfay on the fever al T)iffenfaUons I mean thofe Methods, by which he has con- veyt-d farther Knowledge io them, than they could arrive A by the bare Ufe of the natu- ral Powers he has given them I call them extraoidinary Difcoveries, for want of a bet- ter V.'ord to exprefs my Meaning: Immedi- ate^ which fome have ufed, not being a pro- per Word to this Purpofe. Since it reftrains thefe Difcoveries to thofe, which have been immediately made by God, to the Perfon or Pcrfons to whom lie made them ^ whereas I would take in fuch Difcoveries, as he has made by the Mediation of Angels, or of Pro- phets ; or fach Difcoveries as have been con- veyed down to others, from thofe to whom they have been either mediately or immedi- ately made. All thefe extraordinary Dif- coveries go under the Name of Revelation j and by that Term I fhall for the future ge- nerally exprefs them. The firft of thefe Difpenfations, every one will prefently fee muft be the State in which God created our firft Parents ^ and which is known by the Name of the State of Inno- ceuce, or of the State before the Fall. And in this State it felf, it will be necef- fary to confidcr what was previous to any Revelation from God to them ; at leaft, what was previous to any fuch Revelation in the Order of Things (however it might be in the Order of Time) before we coniider fuch Revelation. For ^ G O D to Mankind. > For though it does not neccfTarily refult from the Nature of God, or of Man, that God fhould make extraordinary Difcoveries of his Will to Mankind ^ yet it neceflarily refults from the Nature of both, that when God gave Man Underftanding aad-Will, ^^sSavs and active Powers, that he muft make Man fubjed to a Law or Rule of his Choice and Condud. For whatever neceflarily refulted from the Frame of Nature, or from the Powers v/hich God had given Man, and the Circumftances, in which God had placed him, would be that Rule to him. Thus the Law of Self- Government or Temperance would immediately appear to him ; Becaufe an improper Indulgence of his Appetites and PalEons (or Intemperance) would appear to be quite contrary to his Make and Frame : For his Make and Frame was to yield to his Appetites and Palfions, where he faw that yielding to them was for his Prefervation, and the regular Propagation of the Species ; not where they would be to his, or their Hurt, or Deftrudion. Thus alfo, if he found himfelf furrounded with other Creatures, even that were of an Order below him, he muft fee, that if they were endued with Powers of feeling Pleafure and Pain, he ought not to deprive them of Pieafure, or inflict Pain, unnecefTarily. And if he was fo happy as to find other Crea- B 2 tures /J. An Eflay on the feveral ^iffenfations tures of the fame Rank with himfelf, about him, he muft fee, that they having Rights as well as he, he ought not to infringe them. 'And that, as his own Happinefs or Mifery would be increafed by theirs, he confequent- ly ow'd them a conftant and perpetual good .Will. And when he once came to confider, as he foon muft, that there was a Being fupremely Powerful, Wife and Good, to whom he and all other Beings ow*d their Exiftence, he muft immediately confider Temperance and Bene- volence, not only to be due to himfelf and others, as they flow from his own Frame, and the Circumftances in which he was placed ,• but as what was thereby exprefs'd to be the Will of his Maker, who had given him that Frame, and placed him in thofc Circumftances : And therefore muft confider Temperance and Benevolence as due to him- felf and others, by Virtue of the Law of his Maker. And he muft then like wife prefently fee, that the higheft Veneration, Gratitude, Obe- dience, Submiflion and Refignation, were uni- verfally, conftantly and perpetually to be -paid to fuch a Being, as long as his own Exiftence continued. Thefe Reflexions therefore, either arofe in the Minds of the firft Man and Woman ,• or at leaft, would have arifen in their Minds on the leaft Attention, if they were not an- ticipated of GOD to Mankind. 5 ticlpated by Revelation. But as Revelation does not give us an Account of any fuch Anticipation, it does not feem likely, that in Fa(ft there was any fuch Anticipation : Since God does nothing in vain in the Moral World, any more than in the Natural -, and therefore is not likely to have revealed that to our firll Parents, which they might eafiiy have come to the Knowledge of, without any Revelation, Whenever thefe Reflexions arofe in their Minds, it would alfo occur to them, that the Rule God had given them, as refult- ing from his Will, who had given them fuch jv Frame, and placed them in fuch Cir- cumftances, was fo perfedly adjufted to their Nature and Situation, that it was fit and beft for them to regulate their Temper and Con- duct by it, if it were but thereby to be as happy as the State they were placed in would allow, or as happy, as they could be in any given Circumftances, as long as their Being continued i and that therefore, if they devi- ated from this Rule, they would lofe the Advantage that attended the obferving it, and meet with fome Inconveniencies that at- tended the departing from it i io that thefe Advantages and Inconveniencies may be con- (idered as the natural San(^ions of the Law of Nature. But befides the Happinefs that would re- fult from obferving this Law, ifWas high- ly fuitable and congruous, that a Being, that 6 An Eflay on thefeveral 7)ifpenfations that came perfed out of the Hands of God, fliould be placed in additional Circumftan- ces of Dignity and Felicity. He had no other Father but God : He was created in his moral Image and Likenefs : He was there- fore his Son by Creation : And whilft he pre- ferved his Duty and Obedience, it was fit he lliould be placed in a State that became fo high a Relation : Or more particularly, that he that refembled him in moral, ihould alfo refemble him in fome of his high natural Per- fedions, and in the Glory and Blifs that re- fults from them. And fo we find he did, from pofitive Ex- prefTions, or from plain Hints in Mofes's Hi- ftory. Particularly we find he was placed in a pleafant Garden, free from Toil, Care and iVexation, with Dominion over the Works of God's Hands, and clothed with a Glory, (as a proper Badge of his high Relation to God, and of the Power and Dominion God had given him) and vefted with Immortality ; as we ihali fee prefently : All this was con- ferred on him as an Inheritance, that was very fuitable to an Earthly Son of God. In this Senfe and Meaning is Adam called the Sofi of God^ JLukc iii. 38. and not barely as God created him, iorfohe did all Things 5 or, as he created him a living Soul, or a Be-« ing enduecLwith rational Powers j for fo he did dtl^MSa, bad as well as good ^ and would equally be the Fatiier of iheojoe, a^ well a:, the other, " God, of G OY) to Mankind. n God, who had given our firft Parents fuch additional Circumftances of Dignity and Fe- licity, can't be fuppofed to have been want- ing in any Thing, that was necefTary for their Subiiftence and Comfort j and therefore as it might be very necefTary to fupply their want of Experience, with a Revelation about their Food, for their own Prefervation ,• and about Marriage, for propagating the Species j wc meet with an Account of the firft, Qei2. i. 29. ii. 9. and of the fecond ch, ii. 22, 23. 'Tis highly probable too, that they were endued with a Language at once, which could not have been formed by themfelves in many Years ^ and without which, there could have been little Society between the firft Pair, or between them and their Defcendants. However, though Adam was created a rational Being, and Innocent or Perfect, and placed in the happy, blifsful and glorious Circumftances I have mentioned ^ yet he could not pofitively allure himXelf how long his Being, or thefe happy, blifsful and glori- ous Circumftances would laft ,• or that he fhould have any coniiderable Term in them granted to him. For Being it fclf, was what he had no Right to, nor the additional De- grees of Blifs and Glory, which attended it ; nor had he any Right to the Continuance of either. Here therefore a farther Revelation was alfo moll q\ ail wanting, in order to his re* 8 An Eflayaughters of Men that they were fair ^ they took them Wi'ves^ of all which they ch fe^ Gen. vi. 2. From thefe Inter-marriages which God had forbid. Corruption and Violence fpread over the Face of the whole Earth. And what lefs was to be expeded from Inter-marriages a- rifing from the Heat of Lull, which had o- vercome the Fear of God, and all Regards to his Promifes and Commands ,• but a G'l- gantick Race ^ Men of uncommon Size and Strength, uncultivated by the Principles of Reafon and Revelation, by which alone the Appetites and Paifions of Health and Vigour are to be controufd. So that Noah^ who, per- haps, was the only Perfon that had kept free from of GOD to Manlind, horn thu unhappy Mixture, and the more un- happy Attendants and Confequenccs of it, was the only righteous or fincere Terfon^ Gen. vi. i. Whereupon God refolv'd to fvvcep away tliis impious Race of Men with a Flood, and to cleanfe the Earth from their Corruption and Violence ; preferving none but Noah and his Family alive : By whom, as the pure Race of Seth^ he would people a new World. For the fake of the lingular Piety of this good Man, God fcems to have blellcd Man- kind immediately after the Flood, fo fir as to have remov'd part of the Curfe, by taking off the great Perverfnefs of the Seafons, and the Sterility of the Ground ^ by making Mankind more fruitful than their Anti-deluvian Ance- ftors ; and by reftoring them to a greater Degree of Dominion over the brute Part of the Creati- on, than they had had lince the Fall, All which was confirmed by a Covenant, that he would not renew his Curfe on the Earth any vriore^ ei- ther by the Inclemency of the Heavens, by the Barrennefs of the Earth, or by the total Deftru(5tion of it j and alfo by a Covenant with every living Creature j that in Compen- fation to them, for being in this greater De- gree of Subjedion to Mankind, he would not defiroy them or the Earth any more. See Gen,jx-mf , xxi. 17 20. Compar'd with Chap.w, 29. viii. 20, 21, 22. ix. i, 2,3,7, 9 — 18. See Dr. SherkcTzs more ftirelfl-rd of 'Prophecy, pag. 87 1 1 9, D 2 This 50 An Effay on the jcveral T)tJpenfations This Covenant was in it felf a great Blef- iing i but yet might be underftood to be a much greater, as it might be apprehended to be a Pledge of a very fuperior Covenant, that God defigned in a few Ages after to make with Mankind ; when he fliouid exprelly pro- mife to recover good Men from Death, the far more bitter Part of the Curfe that ftill remain'd behind, and exprefsly entitle them to eternal Life. This feems to have been intimated by No- ah^ in what he fays prophetically of Shem : Promifmg a farther and peculiar Blelfmg, when he hleffes the Lord God of Shem^ Gen. ix, 26, God's being the Lord God of Shem^ muft denote a farther Blefling than any that had been granted by God to Noah and his Sons in general, or to "Japheth in parti- cular, the Eldeft of them. For being the God of Shem^ is being the Father of Shem. And the Inheritance that God, coniider'd as a Father, is ever faid in Scripture to give to any of his Sons, is Life ^ unlefs it be when it relates to the Adoption of Abraham and his Pofterity to fome earthly Inheritance ^ to which they had no Right by Birth or Ac- quiiition, or any other way th^n by divine Donation. tf^ On the other hand, the unbelieving and ^ifobedient Part of the Family of Nah^ which of GOD to Manhnd. ii which was Hmn and his Defcendantj^, parti- cularly Canaan fcems to have renounc'd their Share in the Blellings that belong'd to the Children of God, and to have become the Fa- mily of the l^evil ,• and accordingly to have been mark'd out as fuch by the Curfe of God in many remarkable Inftances, as had been the Cafe of Cain before the Flood, Gen, iv. II — 2 2. Thefe Inftances of God's fevere Vengeance were fomctimes neceil'ary to pre- vent Rich unhappy Mixtures between thefe two Families, as had brought on the Flood ; and were, in their natural Tendency, Motives to. Repentance. And if they had not that Eltedt, yet muft have rendered the Jufrice of God in any future Punilliment the more confpicuous ; and at the fame time have coniirm'd the Children and Family of God in their Faith and Obedience. Under this Head, to fpeak of them once for all, may be rank'd the Con- fulion and Difperfiou of "Bahel^ the DtTrrudi- on of Sodom^ the Plagues of Egypt^ the Ex- tirpation of the fecen Nations^ &c. Kotwithftanding this univcrfal Defolation by the Flood, in nine Generation<>, the Know- ledge and Worlhip of the one only true God, and all Vertue, had in a manner forfaken the Earth : And the World apoftatizing from their Maker, became Worihipersof falfe Gods. As the Worfliip that had been paid to the true God^ was paid to him \ery much under tlie 1 2 An Eflay on thefeveral 'Difpcnfations the Notion of a Father ; it fcems highly pro- bable to me, that the firft Woriliip of the Devil might be introduc'd under the fame ; lince falfe Religion, efpecially at the firft, would certainly have a near Semblance of the true : And it has been an anticnt and common Obfervation, that the Devil affects to ape God. The Thallagogia^ an Idolatry thought by many learned Men to be extremely antient, gives great Countenance to this Opinion : E- fpecially if Spencers Notion be juft, (which feems highly probable) that Circumcilion was appointed, am.ong other Reafons, to obviate this Idolatry. See Spencer T)e Leg, Hehr. Hit. lib. I. cap. /J.. fe6t. 3. But whether this particular Notion be juft or no, yet it is cer- tain, that Idolatry was fo general, that even the Family of blefled Sbem was not entirely free from a lower kind of it^ they woriliip- ing Images or Terrapbhn, together with the true God, JoJJj, xxiv. 2. However, God 'winya at th'is^ fiiffering their Man- ners^ without fending any Meficnger to re- claim them. But, foon after this Idolatry began, God call'd Jhraham out of Urr of the Chaldees^ chooiing him (who probably was the only Perfon that had kept himfelf free from it, Jofl?, xxiv. 2. Nehem. ix. 7, 8. Jofeph. Jntiq. lib. I.) as the Head of a Family, in which he would preferve the true Religion, Geih xviii. of GOD to Manhnd. a 5 xvlii. 19. (conijfting in a Belief of and in O- bedicnce and Submilfion to the one true God) And by the Means of whofe Travels, diftin- guilVd Protection and VouchfafementSj he would give fuch as were well difpos'd in Ca- iman and Egypt^ &c. [Gen, xii. 17, ip. xiv. 18 — 21. xxi. i8. XXV. 3 — 7. xxvi. 6 — 34.] and elfewhere, an Opportunity to enquire af- ter him. In regard of Jhrahams fingular and un- exampled Faith and Obedience on the great- eft Tryals, God was pleas'd to become his Gcd^ or his Father, See Gen, xvii. 7. xxxL 42. Exoci, iii. 6, and many other Places. For, as has been obferv'd already, God and Father are Terms that are often us'd promifcuoufly in Scripture. God alfo promis'd to hiefs him. This Blelilng feems to be the recovering him from Death, the remaining Part of the ori- ginal Curfe which had not yet been exprefsly taken off to Noah : And by this, NoaFs blef- fmg the Lor<^ God of Shem^ the Anceftor of Abraham^ was explain'd j and that the Lord was the God or Father of Shem^ was fully contirm'd, Gen, xii. 23. See Gen, xxii. 17, 18. For God now exprefsly adopted Jhra- ham^ Shem\ Dcfcendant, to the Inheritance of eternal Life : And alfo all the Families of the Earth that fliouid become his fpiritual Seed - /'. e. Should imitate him in his Faith and Obe- dience, Rom* iv. 12, 16. GaL iii. 5>, 2^. Or in I other 2\ An Hffciyon the fever al Difpenfations other Words of Scripture, th^t JJjotild be perfeU before God^iS he was : That is^ fhould live in a fteady Courfe of fincere Obedience, SubmilTi* on to God's Providence, and Refignation to his future Difpofal, from a firm Belief of his Proteftion, Support, and future Reward. For this BlelTmg was not to be confin'd to fuch only as fhould imitate him among the Race of Shem ,• but to be exprefsly extended to any among the other Families of the Earth, even the moft accurfed, that fliould follow his Ex- ample. However, Ahraham was to have this fingular Honour, that of whatever Fami- ly of the Earth, they were, that fliould imi- tate him, they fhould not receive their Title to this Inheritance immediately from God, as he did ,• but as the Children cf Jbrabam, or thro' Jbraham^ whu was the Father of us all^ Rom. iv. 17, (v^hether Shemmite or Canaanite , Jew or Gentile , Male or Fe^ male^ 'Bond or Free') Js it is written^ a Father of many Nations hace 1 made thee^ before him whom he believed , ezcn God^ who quickneth the T)ead^ and calleth thofe things which be net^ as tho they were. And to give Abraham^ not only the Promife of this Inheritance, but alfo a Promife of a Pledge of it, God likewife promib'd to adopt his natural Seed to an earthly Inheritance, and part of them to the Inheritance of Canaan^ (the Delight of all Lands) who had no other Right to itj F:<.od. xiii. 5. God was pleas'd to of GOD to Mankind. a 5 to repeat thefe Promifes to him, on great Occafions, for the Confirmation of his Faith, Gen, xiii. 14, 18. x. 5. xvii. 21. And to make them ftill clearer in Proportion to his Faith's growing ftronger. And in order ftill farther to encourage and ftrengthen his Faith and Truft in God, God was pleafed to ap- point Circumcifion, as the Seal of thefe Cove- nants or Promifes : {(ien. xvii. i - — ■ 1 5. Kom, ix. 4. Heh. xi. 13.) Or in other Words, as a farther AfTurance of this Adoption to an earth- ly as well as to an heavenly Inheritance. And therefore Circumcifion was enjoyned to npne, but fuch as were entitled to both thefe Inheri- tances. So that, I think, Circumcifion fliould be confidered as the Badge of God's vifible Family, or of God's Sons by a double Adop- tion, and of them only. That Ahraham might have the more .(>rong Confolation in the lively Hopes of this do.hle Inheritance (and of one of them, fviz, the earthly, as a Pledge of the other, mz. the heavenly) God was pleafed at laft in infinite Condefcenfion to confirm them by an Oath, QeiL xxii. 1 6, And to the intent that the Vi- gor of thefe Hopes might be the better pre- fcrved, on which their Performance of the Condition fo much depended, and confequent- ly the Performance of the Promife on God's Part, God faw fit to repeat thefe Promifes (which he had fo folemnly confirmed to Abra- ham) to Ifaac and to Jacob afterwards, E {Qen, ^6 An "Efhyon the jeveral Difpenfations (Gen. xxvi. 34. xxvii, 29. xxviii. 4, 13, 14.) Heirs together with him of the fame Promife, Ueb. XL p, Jhraham^ Ifaac^ and Jacoh^ and their Defcendants, being the firft Family of all the Families of the Earth, that received any ex- prefs Promife, that God would be their God^ and blefs them ; or in other Words, that he would be their Father, and that they fliould be his Children ^ Theirs zvas the Adoption^ the Tromifes^ and the Covenants^ and the In- heritances.^ Rom. X. 4» Heb. xi. 8^ 13. Hence it is, that God calls Israel or the Children of Jfrael (the Defcendants of Jhraharn) his Son and his Firft-born, 'Exod/w. 22. Ifr ael dinA his Sons being adopted to Canaan., the Inheri- tance of the Firft-born, whilft IJhmael had only Idtmea^ and Bjfau only Mount Seir for a PofTelfLon, ^eiit, xi, 5. And hence it is that God is alfo the Father of all Jhraharn s fpiritual Seed : The Seed^ or People, that was to he horn ; or the Seed that was to ferve him., and that was to he account- ed to him for a Generation., Pfal. xxii. 30, 31. God having adopted them from being the Chil- dren of Men, and of the Devil, Heirs of the firft and fecond Death (which laft \s called Wrath) to an heavenly Inheritance, by his Free Grace, in Chrift J ejus our Lord. But farther, the Blelling promifed to Ahra- hayHy the Father of all the Faithful, and to his faithful or fpiritual "b^^d.^ was not a bare ' Deli- ^ G O D to Mankind, o 7 Deliverance from all the Curfes that Adam brought on his Seed, or that which they un- happily acquired by becoming the '^tQdi of the Serpent (as has already been fliown) but the affuring him of a fuperior BlelTing to that which Adam had forfeited : Or the alluring him of the Inheritance of an adopted Son of God, c/z.. a Refurre6lion to an heavenly Dominion, Glo- ry, Blifs, and Immortality, as we learn from our Saviour's Argument againfl the Sadducees^ Luke XX. 37. and from St. T aid's EpiiHe to the Qalatians^ Chap. iii. 14. under the I'erms dithe Wejjing of the Spirit : The Spirit being to quicken or raife us up, and being in the mean time the Earneft of this Adoption, that is the Redemption of our Bodies from the Bon- dage of Corruption, Kom, iii. 21. and the In- heritance which is to follow it. And from the New Teftament, where this Matter is more fully explained, we learn, that when this Redemption lliall be effeded by the Spirit, then inftead of an animal, earthly Body, cloathed with a Glory derived from the firfh Adam (who was but a living Soul, i Ccr, XV. 45.) in which we might have enjoyed an earthly Paradife, or a foiitary Garden, that we were to have drelfed, and where we lliould have had Dominion over the Fiili of the Sea, the Fowls of the Air, and over every living 1 hing that moveth on the Earth, and fubdued them j Gen. i. 28. ii. 15. and where we might have fometimes conversed with animal Men, E 2 like a 8 An Eflay (?w the fever al 1>ifpenfations like our fclves, and now and then have feen the Glory of God, and heard his Voice, as Jdam did in the Cool of the Day, Gen. iii. 8. (which, as we have before obferv'd, was the Inheritance with which he was veft- ed foon after his Cre^tjpn j) We may have a glorious, celeftiai, ^incorruptible Body, ilii- ning like the Sun in the Firmament, deriv'd from the fecond Adam^ who is a qiiickning Spirit (i Cor. xv. 45.) and refembling his glo- rious Body j in which we fliall inhabit the heavenly Jeriifalem^ where there fhall be no more Ciirfe^ nor no more Nighty Rev* xxii.3,5. but where we JJjall he Kings and Priefts unto- Gody and haz'e 'Dominion oz'er the Wicked^ Pfal. xlix. or as St. Taitl fays, judge Angels md the Worlds i Cor. vi. 2, 3. And at full Reft and Leifure, and without any Interruption, enjoy the blefled Society of the Allembly of the Firft-born, whofe Names are written in Heaven, and of an innumerable Company of Angels ,• and where after we have been intro- duced by Jefus the Mediator of the better Covenant, to God the Judge of all, we Jlmll he ever with the Lord^ and fee him as he is, Abraham being the firft, to whom this Blelfing was exprefly prcmifed after the Curfe that had been pronounced on the Fall j Blef- fing and Curling are afterwards often ufed in Scripture as Terms equal to Life and Happi- nefs, and to Mifery and Death. (See T>ettt. xxvii. 14, 25. and xxviii. 2— —14. Mcitth. XXV. ^/ G O D to Mankind. 29 XXV.34. Rom.iv.9. G'^/.iii. 8,93 10,13,14,) And it may be always iignify this in part, if not in whole. This Blefling Is exprclTed in other Words of Scripture, as forgicingj or not imputing Sin^ Rom. iv. 7, 8. And jtiftifyingy imputing or counting for Righteoiifncfs^ Rom. iv. 3. GaL iii. 8. Ihe reafon of which Expreifions is plain, fince whofoever is ReUns in Curia is intitled to all the Privileges and Blefiings that belong to the Jurifdidtion of that Court ; or rather to all the Privileges and Blefiuigs which belong to the Subjects of that King- dom, which erects or conftitutes that Court. After the Fall God had hitherto only ma- nifefted his Glory and Will to particular Fa- milies, Seth's, NoaJjs; and at iaft to Jhra- hmnSj Ifaacs^ and Jacolis^ by an exprefs Covenant of Adoption confirm'd by a Seal, a promis'd Pledge and an Oath. But the Family of y^r^Z' multiplying exceedingly, till it came from feventy Souls, which went down into jELo-j/?/-, (Gen.xlvii.27.) to be about fix hundred thoufand Men, belides Children, or Male-chil- dren, (^Exod. xii. 37.) and God remembring his Covenant, or his temporal Covenant, or the temporal part of his Covenant made with their Forefathers Abraham^ Ifaac^ and Ja^ cobj and their natural Seed, that he would give them the Land of Canaan^thQ promis'd Pledge of 20 Ayi EiTay on the fever al Dijpenjations of the Performance of the better Promife, {Exod ii. 24, and iii. 8.) He now refolved to ^ive them the actual PoflelfLon of the Earneft of it, and to take this Family, People, Nati- on, and Kingdom, to himfeif^ and confe- quently that he would become their King, and their God. And fending a MeiTage to them by M-fes, that he would deliver them from the Bondage of the Egyptians^ and re- folving alfo very foon to propofe to them to become his People, he then firft calls them his ^People in fpeaking to M(fis ; Exod. iii. 17. and afterwards in Meflages, which he fent by Mofes to Tharaoh about them, Exod* v. i. and vi. 7. The better to prepare them for fuch a Kingdom, God had fuffer'd them to groan under a long and cruel Opprelfion in Egypt -^ and in order to fix their Attention, and iikewife draw the Attention of Mankind to Himfelf through them, he was pleas'd to deliver them from their Opprelfion, in a Man- ner that mull make the greatell Noife in the AVorld. Perhaps God faw it the more fit to eredl this Family into a Kingdom under Himfelf at this Period of Time, to prevent their worlliiping the Devil, as "Baal or Lord ^ that is, as the Lord or God of the Country which they were going to inhabit : Which about this Time was the Notion under which Worlliip was paid him by all the People in their Neighbourhood, See Spencer de l.'beocr. Judaic* Mankind ha. of GOD to Manhnd, :^ i having now ftill fi^rthcr apoltatizVi from the true God. and funk deeper into the Woifliip of the Devi], as their Father and f.ord, (though he was the grand and avowed Enemy of God, and of Mankind) and pradiling all forts of Impiety and Wickednefs in honour to him: Such indeed as were intircly fuitcd to their own dark Minds, to the Prince of Darknefs, and to the Empire he had ufurped over them. The better to obviate this Mifchicf, as well as for other wife Rcafons, God was pleafed Hfiy Days after their going out of Egypt^ ac- tually to ered them into a Kingdom under Himfelfj as their King and their God, by the Covenant in the WiUernefs at Mount Sinai : Namely, that as he had delivered them out of the Land of ^gypt^ and out of the Houfe of Bondage, he would take them for a Peo-ole. and they fliould take the Lord for their God, and fliould obey him. E^xod, xix. 4, 9. and XX. 2, \g. T)etit, i. 17. and xxvi. ly^ 18. yG- Jlmci^YAV. 22. Hofea xin. ro. Exod.xxiv,^^ i 2. The Circir.njlances which attended the en- tring into this Covenant were highly fuitable to that Tranfadion. The Tim.e of creeling this Kingdom^ was when they could not but have very awful and grateful Thoughts of God ^ in a Place retird from all Mankind, w^ho were Idolaters, and confequently from all Solicitati- ons to any of their idolatrous Practices, and in fo awful a Manner as was calculated to flnke them and their Pofterity with the mod tre- mendous q7 An Eflay on the fever al Difpenfations mendou$ Impreflions of the Authority of the Lawgiver; All which would be little enough to preferve fuch a wayward and untra(^able People from the Supcrftitions of their Neigh- bours. To thefe, fuch pf any other Family as by the Confideration of God's amazing Providen- ces towards the IfrdelitjJJj Family and Nation, fhould be brought to acknowledge the God of Ifraelhx the only true God, and would fubmit to the Laws of this Kingdom which he hacj ereded, were joyn'd : And a general Natura- lization of all fuch became a (landing Law of their State. And as Circumcifion had been the Badge of God's Family, fo now it was made the Badge of all his male Subjedts {John vii. 32,) who were to be the Inheritors of the Land of Canaan. As this Kingdom was, among other Purpq- {'ts^ dedgn'd as a Reward for the Piety of Abraham^ and as a Reward for his Defcen- dants, who though far from being all perfo- rally pious, yet were the only Family that woriliip'd the true God, or own'd the Rule of Virtue \ God {^ssf Ht to blefs them at once, and b^fee-hartd; with the Riches of Egypt^ as had been foretold to AhrahajTiy Gen. xv. 14. (which they feem to have demanded as due for their hard Labour, JLxod, ii. 3 5, 3<^. and which the Egyptians willingly gave them to get rid oF them) and with a great and remarkable Overthrow of that People at the IB^ed Sea: / . ., ^ , I When of GOD to Mankind. 5^ When after the moft cruel OpprelTion, and contrary to the moft exprefs Agreement, they came to hinder them from going into the Wil^ dernefs to facrihce, as God had commanded them. They were likevvifc to have had an immediate PolTelfion of the Land of Canaan^ {a Land which he had efpied fur them ; Ezek. XX. 6, A Land flowing with Milk and Honey) and had a free Government ellablifh- ed over them, (See Harringtons Art of JLaw- gi'ving^ Book II. And the Trcrogatit'e of Popular Qo'vermnentj Book II. c. 3.) that ex- celled all others, not only in the peculiar Ho- nour and Advantage of having God for their King, but ('as might naturally thence be ex- pected) in the moft excellent Laws and Con- llitutions i till they by their incurable prone- nefs to Idolatry and Vice oblig'd him, as a wife and gracious Governor, to defer their going into Canaan for fom.e Years, and to propofe Laws to them, that were not good in themfelves, but which were necelTary from their wicked Temper and Difpofition, as Re- medies to prevent greater Evils, and even their utter Extirpation, long before it overtook them. See 'Eze'k xx. 4—27. Nor would their Wickednefs fuffer God to flop here, but at laft, in jull: Punilhment of their Obftinacy and Perverf--nefs, forc'd him to withdraw more and more from the Exercife of his Regal Authority over them ; and at their fooiiili and perverfe DeiirCj to commit it to fuch, as ufed F them -^^ An EfTay tf?2 the fever al J)ifpenfations them with a Harfhnefs and Severity that was but too, like the Kings of all the Nations round about them. Thus however, by the Covenant at Sinai J the Ifraelites became God's People : Or a People that he had feparatcd to himfelf from all the People of the Earth, who were Children and Subjc(5ts of the Devil, and to fuch a Degree, as to make the higheft Ads of Wicked nefs the higheft Ads of their D^evoti- on to him, or to other Idols by his Suggefti- on. On this Account the Ifraelites are called an holy Teople or Nation to the Lord^ Exod. xix. 6. Deut. vii. 6. and xiv. 2. and xxvi. 19. It may be of ufe on this Occafion to ftop a Moment, to recoiled, that thofe, who by the Covenant at Sinai were become his People, were already his Sons^ or Children, or Firft- born, and that he had been their Father by exprefs Covenant from the Time of Abraham^ as he was nov/ to be their King : And to ob- ferve, that from hence it is that Children and Teopky are in effed the fame thing, and pro- mifcuoufly ufed in Scripture. Exod* vi. 7. and X. 3. and xix. 5,5. and xxxi. 9. and Hofea i. 10. Rojn.'iK, 25. GaL i'lL 26. This may account for what might otherwife appear fomewhat ftrange in the facred Wri- ters. And after this, the Terms of God and Father, or Terms which imply them, are ftill ufed promifcuoufly with greater Frequency in the old Tefiament. Thus ^ G O D to Mankind, 2 5 Thus God ereded [ the Family, or ] the Children of Ifrael into a Kingdom : But it was but a temporal or an earthly K.ingdom^ though under himfelf, who was an heavenly King : In which he always acted fuitably to •that high Character, whilft he condefcended fo far as to become their earthly or temporal Prince. And though this Kingdom, which he a4minifter'd, was but an earthly Kingdom, yet if they would but have obferv'd its Laws, without the lead Breach of any one of them, they would have obtained Life by the Works of this Law. 'Ezeh xx. 10 — — 27. T)eut, vi 25. G^/. iii. 10. Rom.iv,^, and iii. 27, (That is, as I apprehend, an animal or terre^ ftrial Life.) For as God took them for his People, it was but fitting that he fhould give them a fpiritual and a perfect Law. See Tfa/. xix. 7. Maf. xxii, -^6. Rom. v'n. 12. And a perfect Law perfectly obey'd muft entitle all that fo obey it to Happinefi and Life. On the other hand, as God was the fupreme Magi- flrate in this Kingdom, fo he could punifh the Breach of fuch Lav/s as were fpiritual. For though he ordinarily left the Ifraelites to be proceeded againft by the inferior Alagiflrates, by Tlea or Contro'jerfy^ or fecundmn aUa & ;prohaTa^ yet he feems to have inflicted Punifh- ments in fome cafes immediately himfelf, which I take it are pointed out by fuch a Phrafe as this. The Lord will fet his Face ^gainfl that Man^ Lev. xvii. 10. Inflances to this pur- F 2 pofe 56 An Eflay on the fever al ^ifpenfations pofe may be feen, EoXod. xxxiii. 3 5. Lev, x. p. N^imb. xii. 10. xvi. 31^ 32. 2 Sam. vi. 7. 2 Cbrcn.xxvi. 18. But notwithftanding the Ifrcielites had fuch Proraifes and Threatnings, yet Men being ve- ry frail, from the Strength of their Appetites and Pailions, and the numerous Objects that furround them, and that perpetually foiicit and provoke them ^ and the Law being alfo weak, or infufficient to affift their Reafon in the Purfuit of Vertue, by not promiiing the Forgivenefs of Sins that were pad, or of future TranfgreiTions ,• but inftead of any fuch Promi- fes, denouncing Death for each of them ( For cur fed is e^very one that continneth not in all 'things that are written in the Law to do them : Deut. xxviii. 26. Gal.'nu 10.) And being alfo weak, by not propoling a fufficient Re- ward, or a Reward that was attainable j the Law, notwithftanding that Part of it was fpi- ritual and perfed:, and could have given Life to any, who could have obfcrv'd it exactly, (Z^c. xviii. 5. Matt. xxii. 35. Rom, iii. 27. iv. 4. vii. 12, 14.) became only the Law or Infirument of an imperfect Conftitution tho- rough its Rigor as a fpiritual Rule, and tho- rough the Weaknefs of this Conftitution, '^of which it was the Law or Inftrument) on ac- count of its being without a fufficient or an at- tainable Reward . And though Part of this Law was fpiritual, ar.d regarded the very Motions of fhe Mind, " • yet of GOD to Mankind. 37 .yet the far greater Part of it was carnal : In- deed all the Law was fo, that could be exa(5t- ly obey 'd. • This we learn frotn an exprefs Af- fertion, Heb. ix. 10. And from being told, T/ji:n it purify d nothing hut the Flep : "But could not p7irge the Confcicncey Heb. ix. 13, 14. (to which it was altogether unprofitable^ Heb. vii. 18.) Nor make the Comers thereunto per- feU. From both thefe Confederations it appears how this Law became deadly ^ as St. VauJ^^- ierts, Rom. vii. 10. 1 he Rigor of that Part of the Law that was fpiritual, requiring Per- fecftion on pain of Death, made that Part of it deadly j it being impracticable j and the Pe- nalty of every Dilbbedience to this part of the Law being Death, and the great Numiber of Precepts that were carnal, made thofe who were fubje(^ to them alfo often liable to Death. Befides, the Law was Death or deadly, be- ^aufe it could not give Life : As thofe Precepts could not in their own Nature which were carnal : No more than thofe, which though in their own Nature perfect, yet through the Weaknefs of Mankind, and the Defects of the Conflitution of that Kingdom (allowing no Forgivenefs, Relaxation or Abatement, and not propofmg a fufficient or an attainable Reward) could not be perfciitly obey'd. This Law, which was partly carnal, and all of it deadly, God gave the Ifraelites^ to let them fee, that as this was not the Lav/ of a ^^ An Eflay on the fever al Difpenfations a perfect Conftitution, the Conftitution it felf was not defign'd to be perpetual : And even to {hew them at laft, that it was intended to lead them to a better Flope^ viz. The Law of the Spirit of Life : Or, The Law of that King- dom which cannot hefljakeu : Or, as St. Taitl exprelTes it under other Images ; God gave them this Law to he a School-mafter to bring them to Chrif}^ Gal. iii. 24. And thus Chrirfj or the Chriftian Religion may be faid to be the Lnd of the Law^ or to be prophefyd of by itj or contained in it^ juft as Equity is faid by our Saviour to be the Law and the Trophets^ Mat. vii. 1 2. As Mofes was God's chief Miniflcr in ered- ing this earthly Kingdom ,• fo JoJJjua^ the Judges^ Kings and Prophets^ were his chief Miniiiers in preferving and continuing it. "Jo- JJjua and the fucceeding Jitdgcs were rais'd up by God, to introduce the ifraelites into Ca- naan^ or to prelerve the PolIeOion of it to them, on feveral extraordinary Emergencies. The People at laft growing weary of thefe uncertain and occalional Governors, and of the Form of Government that prevail'd under them, and affecting to be like their Neigh- bour,^, deiir'd a King : Though they thereby rejeUed God from ruling ocer them^ t Sam. viii. 7. God gave them 6>«/ in his Anger, and took him away in his Wrath. The People miizht of GOD to Mankind. 5 9 might well be afraid, Icaft ^a'vid^ whom God had anointed in Saul's ftead, might have no Line, any more than Said ,• and might be appreheniive of the Eifcds of fuch an unfettlcd State, introduc d by their own Folly and Wic- kednefs, in asking a King. They might well fear, left the Government fhould be quite un- hing'd ; and left Canaan it felf, the Pledge of a better Inheritance, fliould be intirely loft : And which now, beiides, too like other Pled- ges, when the Thing of which they are the Earneft is unfeen or delay 'd, had loft a great deal of its Force. To prevent the ill Confe- quences which might have enfu'd from any Un- certainty in this Matter, and to give a new Spring to their Hopes, the Continuance of the Kingdom under 'ODa'vid and his Line, feems to have been made a Pledge of the future Kingdom, of the future Son of T>a'vidj fpo- ken of TfaL ii. 7. Ixxxix. i^, 20. (who is alfo call'd 'Da'vid^ Jer. xxx, p. Hof. iii. 5. Ezek. xxxiv. 23,24. xxxvi. 24, 25. from the moft exad Refemblance and Analogy between T)a- 'vid and him) and confequently of the Righte- oufnefs of that Kingdom, and of Life as the Reward of that Righteoufnefs. God gives therefore a Promife of this Pledge, and of the Thing pledg'd ,by it, and confirms them by an Oath. The Promife of the Pledge indeed was conditional, as may be feen 2 Sam. vii. 14. xxiii. 5. I Kings ii. 4. viii. 2 5. But the Pro- mife or Covenant of the Thing pledg'd, was I ab; ij.o An Eflfay on the fever at Difpenfations abfolute , as may be feen 2 Sam. v'n. 16^ 26, 27. I Chron. xvii. 14, 23, 24, 27. Af^s ii. 25 — -37. TfalAxxxix. 16 — 39. Ifaiab Iv. 3, 4. ^^j xiii. 34 — 38. "Jer. xxxiii. 17, ^i, 25. The abfolute and conditional Pro- itiife may be feen together, TJhl. cxxxii ii, 12. where likevvife the abfolute Promife, if not the conditional, is confirmed by the Oath of God ; As it alfo is, Tfa/. Ixxxix. 3 5. Wh?tt has been faid of this Covenant with IDavid^ may ferve to Hiew us, why the new T^eftament Writers lay fo much ftrefs on Chrift's being a Son of T>a'vidy or of the Hoiife and Lineage of 'Da'vid ; (in too many Places to be quoted) of his being to have the 'Throne and Kingdom of his Father IDaz^id^ and of his being to reign oi'er the Hoiife of Jacob, and that for et'er^ Matt. i. 20. Lukei. 3 2, 33. Ads xiii. 23-. Mark x. 47. And this may alfo ferve to fhew us, why the Apoftles, on Chrift's Afcenfion, fay that he w^as then adually rais'd to David's Throne^ Ads ii. 30,35 xv. 1 6. But as on the Kingdom's becoming Heredi- tary, God feems to have withdrawn more from the Exercife of his regal Authority, and the Anfwers by Urim and Thummim ceas'd ^ (See Spencer de Leg, Hebr. Kit. Lib. Ill, cap. 7.) And as from the Time o^ oAhaZy the Afeirs of the Kingdom of Jiidah feem'd ad- verfe and threatning, till at laft they became quite defperate, and fo both the Pledge of the Continuance of the Kingdom under the Line of T>avidi of GOD to Mmhind. 4 1 Dac'Id, and of Canaan it fclf, feem'd to lofe all their Force and Virtue j God fa\T fit to fup- ply this Defect ,• and keep their Hopes alive by clearer Predictions of the univerfal and perpe- tual Kingdom of TD^rc/V, or of the Son of 2)^:v"^, or the Mejjiab^ by a Succelfion of Prophets, from Ifaiab to Malachi ^ who fpake not only of this Kingdom, of its Ex- tent and Duration ; but of the Righteoufnefs it fiiould introduce, and of Life, as the Re- ward of that PJghtcoufnefs, (^Ifaiab liii. liv. 12, 17. y^r. xxiii. 5, 6. xxxi, 31 — 35. xxxiii. I 5, 1 5. T)au, ix. 24. xii. 2, 3. Hah. ii. 4. This Succeilion of Prophets had alio this in common with the Prophets that went before them, that they were often fent to explain the Law, or to give new Rules for their CondudTj on particular Occaiions ^ to exhort, admonilli, reprove, threaten, comfort, or animate this People, as there was Occafion. For the Pro- phets are to be confider'd, as having a fort of legatine CommifTion from God, if I may be allow'd to ufe that Expre^Hon (efpecially fuch as were fent to the Houfe of Ifrael after their Revolt from the Line of l^a'vid) according as the Circumftances of the Nation requir'd. For to the Nation they were fent, not to particular Perfons ,• and to the Nation, were their Rules, Admonitions, Reproofs, Denunciations, En- couragements, and Promifes given ^ and nati- onally are they to be underftood : Though there are feveral Things ioterfper^'d, relating ^G to 4- 1 An Effay on the fever al J)ifpenfations to the Religion of Nature, and o^ Jhraham^ and the farther Expectation of being delivered from Death, and adopted to eternal Life, by Prophecies clear enough to keep fuch an Hope alive in their Minds (particularly in the Books of Deuteronomy^ yojhna^ and the Prophets) as the furefl: Principle of national Fidelity and Obedience ^ together with entire Books writ- ten for their Inftrudtion in moral and divine Things : Such as the Book of Joh^ '^Pfalms^ Trot'erhs^ and 'Ecclefiafies- But though it was an earthly Kingdom, and immediately anfvver'd the Ends of fuch a Kingdom, and no other j yet it was alfo de- fign'd for other Purpofes. Particularly it did not only ferve to put the Jfraelites perpetual- ly in mind of God, as the Creator and Go- vernor of the World, as the Rewarder of the Tatriarchs^ and as the God oi Jbra- ham^ whenever they had to do with Him as the King di Ifrael -^ (all the Homage that was to be paid to Him as King of Ijrciel^ being fuited to the Charader of an heavenly King, though condefcending to ad as an earthly King j) but it was fet up in the World, as a Light on a Hill (as the Family of Ahraham^ IfaaCy^ and Jacob were before) in order to make all the World gaze on it, and enquire after the Qod of Ifrael ^ after the End for which fuch particular Laws, and fo peculiar a Polity was given this People ^ and after the Expedation this People had, either near or ^ G O D to Manhnd, 45 or more remote ,• cr that might be reafonably entertain'd about them. See Sherlock on Tro- cidence^ p. 393. Nor was it defign'd only to raife an Expe- (flation among the 'Jews^ and among Mankind, of the Kingdom of the MciTiah, but to prepare Things for it : So as to raife the greater At- tention to it at Chrift's Appearance, and fo as that it might be known when it iliould take Place, at his being feated on his Throne, at the right Rand 0^ the Ma) e fly on high, [See Sherlock on Tro^'ideuce^ P*3^4-] This was done by Prophecies, and fuch Analogies, as I fhall briefly mention prefently. As thefe were the great and ultimate Ends, for which the earthly Kingdom was eredted, lb in the mean time God delign'd, by making the profperous and adverfe State of that King- dom (both within it felf, and with refped: to its Neighbours) always keep a due Proportion to the Virtue and Vice of the Bulk of the Peo- ple, to furnilli a Story, from whence the no- bleft Moral might be drawn j not only for the Benefit of themfelves, and of their Pofteri- ty, but of other Perfons and Nations that were either Cotemporary w^ith them, oi' that fucceeded them. And if I may be allow'd to anticipate my Subjed: a little, fince 1 am on this Head, rather than return to it again ,• I would obferve, that it muft be vifible to every one, that compares the earthly with the heavenly Kingdom, that G 2 there 44- An Eflay on the fever al T^iffenfations there is a great Similitude and Analogy be- tween them : At lead: between the great Out- lines of them : That is, that the heavenly Kingdom anfwers ail thofe Purpofes to jMen's Minds in a very fiiperior Manner, which the earthly Kingdom ferved to Mens Bodies, And without all doubt this Similitude or Analogy was deiign'd with great Wifdom and Beauty by the Framer of theni^ to let us, who live in the new Age, fee that they had one Author j and that the one was deiign'd at lafl: to lead Men into the other ; fo that the A-Uthor of the Epiftle to the Hebrews was able to fhew the Jews^ that whatever was ex= cellent in the Tabernacle, Temple, Altar^ Priefthood, or Sacrifices of the earthly King- dom, for the purifying of the Fleflj^ was pro- vided in a much higher Degree in the King- dom that could not he JJmken^ towards the p2t- rifying the Confciences of its Suh]cd.sfro7n dead JVorks, But 1 do not pretend that the JewiJIo Tabernacle, Temple, Altar, High-prieft and Sacrifices, when they were appointed, were deiign'd to intimate to the Ifraelites^ at that time, that there was to be a chrifHan Taber- nacle or 1 em pie. Altar, High-priell-, and Sa- crilicej finqe I don't find by any Paflage in the Old 1 efiament, that any fuch Thing was intended by them ^ or by any Pailage m the OldTeftcwwnt^ or in the New, that they had any fuch Eii^edl. But on the contrary, plain Hints in both, cfpecially in the latter, that they of GOD to Manhnd. 45 ,thcy did not produce any fuch vSentimcnts in the Minds of that People. 1 fhould rather therefore from thcfc Obfervations, as well as from the Nature of the B^cfemblanccs and Analogies themfclvcs , conclude that they were fuch as might be traced after the heaven- ly Kingdom took Place, according to the Idea or Model of which they were framed, rather than fuch, as could prefigure the Chriftian Tabernacle or Temple, High-prieft, Altar or Sacrifice before hand. And by the by, I be- lieve this will be found to be the Cafe of Pro- phecies too in a good meafure, ijc. Bcfidcs, the ExprelHons that are us'd by the Ne'W ^feftame^it JFn'fers concerning this Matter, fully confirm this Opinion. For on this A.c- count the Holy Place [San(auary] is cali'd the Antitype (as dvlnvncL iliould be rendered) of the true. Heb. ix. 24, And when [the Sanctuary, or] Holy Places are faid to be the Antitypes of the true, the Meaning is, that [the Sanctuary, or] Holy Places were made after the Type or Model of the true Sanduary or Holy Place. For as ti^'ttCP-, a Type, fig- nifies a Model, dvlnv-n^^ the Antitype, fig- nities what is made after that Model. See Idotiov Sykes Effay^ &c. p. 181, 182. The Hrfh Divine that has given Occalion to think juftly on this Subject : Though in exprefs Con- tradiction to this Text, the earthly Sanctuary has been called the 1 ype of the heavenly : Whereas the heavenly Sandtuary is here fuppo- fcd 4 6 An Eflay on the fever al ^ifpenfations fed to be the Type, and the earthly Sanduary is exprefly faid to be the Antitype. So like- wife St. Taiil calls the LaiiD a Shadow^ Heb. X. I. Cokf.Vu 17. And he in the laft Text adds, "That the "Body is Chrift : That \^^ the Chriftian Religion, or the heavenly Kingdom, is the Body, which cafts the Shadow, inz. the earthly Kingdom. It is here very pertinent to our purpofe, to obferve, that a Shadow is only fuch a Refemblance as reprefents the Outlines of the Body, but is not fuch a parti- cular and diftincTt Refemblance, as a Pi(5ture or Image \s^ which reprefents the particular Fea- tures of the Face, and every particular part of the Body. This is the exprefs Affertiori, Heh, X. I. where the Author fays, For the Law halving a Shadow vf good Things to come^ and not the eery Image [^^tCvx] of the Things^ can iie'ver with thofe Sacrifces — make the Com- ers thereunto perfeU, This may ferve not on- ly to confirm the Notion I here bring it to fup- port, but what I advanced but jufl before, ^viz. That the Law was fuch a Rcprefentation of the Gofpel as would fliew the Analogy after the Gofpel took place, rather than prefigure it before hand. From hence we may farther fee, how Chrift is faid to be in the Law and the Prophets : Namely, as a Type or Model may be faid to be in its Antitype, or that which is made after that Model : Or as a Body may be faid to be in a Shadow, that reprefents the Outlines of I it: of GOD to Manhnd. 47 it ; Or as a ftately Building defign'd for the Heir, when at full Age, may be faid to be in a lefs Building of the fame Proportions, built of worfe Materials, intended for the Heir during his Nonage. In a Word, Chrift may be faid to be in the Law (not typically indeed, but) antitypically, umbratically, and analogically. It has been already obferv'd, that the Law of the earthly Kingdom was deadly. And fince it was, it was happy, that being made only between God and one Family, tiz. of Ifrael^ it could not difanul the Covenant or Promife, which God had made four hundred Years before to Ahraham^ and all the Fami- lies of the Earth, that fliould imitate his Faith and Obedience, as St. ^aiil is fliewn to argue with great Force by Mr. JLock^ in his incom- parable Note on Qal. iii. 15 — 21. and there- fore though God could juftify none of the Sub- jects of his earthly Kingdom to eternal Life, by the Rule, Law or Conftitution of that Kingdom j yet he juftify 'd as many as were the fpiritual Seed, or Children of Abraham^ i. e. "doho trod in the Steps of his Faith and Obedience^ Gal. iii. 6 — 10. Rom. iv. 10 — 13. according to the Promife and Covenant made with Abraham^ and all his St^dy whether Jews or Gentiles ^ Rom. iii. 30. Of the lat- ter Sort were the Profelytes of the Gate, fuch as arc defcrib'd, Tfal. xxvi. 3 — 7. Who 'were to recei've the "Bleffmg of the God of Jacob : And fuch in every Age, and in every Nation, that 48 An ElTay on the feveral T)ifpenfations that feared God and 'wrought VJghteoufnefs^ Ad:s X. 34, 35. So that T>aan. ix. 14. And the Word himfelf condefcending to take Flefli did the fame J and fent out his twelve Apoftles, and after them his feventy Difciples in his Life- time to do the like : And taught Men to pray that this Kingdom might come^ that is-, might come of GOD to Mankind. 49 come fpcedily: Mat. vi. 10. And after he had fully taught a Rule, and had been himfelf an Example of that Righteoufnefs, which if his Pifciples v/ere conformVl to, he aii'ured them they would obtain eternal Life, and had as a Son become obedient unto Death, God be^at him from the Dead, making him the Firft-fruits of thofe who flcpt ; whereby he declard him to he his Son^ Rom. i. 4. and the Heir of all Tubings. In a few Days after He gai'e him Glcry^ i Pet. i. 21. and vefled him with kingly Power, upon his triumphal Afcen- fion ; when he firft entered Heaven for tis^ or as cm" Forerunner^ and fate down at the right Hand of God : And being then alfo anointed with the Oil of Gladnefs aboz^e bis Fellws^ (Heb i. 9.) Angels voluntarily fiib- jeUing themf elves to him : Or in other Words of Scripture, bein^ filled with all Fulnefs as the Head of his Kingdom, Church and Peo- ple, He filed his Jpoflles with fuch a pro- portionable Fulnefs under him, as fitted them to be the chief Minifters of his Kingdom ; en- abling them (by the Holy Ghoft ilied down upon them, j^Us ii. 33.) to convince the Jews^ that he was exalted to the right Hand of God ^ cr to all ^Power : Enabling vhem alio to per- fwade the Jews to be reconciled to God, and to publifh the Laws and the Myfteries of this Kingdom, or to open the Stat'.* of it. When 1 fay that the Apcfiles were enabled to con- vince, perfvvade, and inftrucl: the Jews ^ I H mean 50 An Jiffzyon the fever al Difpenfations mean Individuals , for to fr.ch only were they fent. Chrift aifo hllcd others as inferior Mi- nifters of his Church or Kingdom, for other Purpofes ; namely, to teach, exhort, admo- nifl"!, reprove or comfort his People, or dif- charge other Offices in it, according to its va- rious Exigencies. Then the Kingdom of God, of Chrift, or of Heaven (called aifo the Kif{^^07n (f Light) took Place in the World. The Jew that became a Subjed of this Kingdom, or one of God's People in it, became fo only by be- lieving Chrifr to be rifen and exalted to be the King of it, and by making an open Profeilion of his Belief, at his being publickly tranllated into this Kingdom by Baptifm j and if he per- fevered in obeying the Laws of this Kingdom, which were m.iid and gentle ^ and to which the Framxc and Conilitution of it gave hii^i fufficient Encouragement, Motives and Affi- ilances, he became one of its faithful Subjects, fanil^tify'd in Soul, Body and Spirit ^ and enti- tled by the Grace of it3 to the Reward of an endlefs Life. By this new Frame and Conflitution, eternal Life- was far more iirmly alllir'd than by the Jhrahamick Covenant, by the Jewijh Con- jflitution, by the Kingdom fettled on the Fa- mily of T}a'vid^ by the Predictions of the Pro- phets, or by the Predictions, or the Preach- i^^§ of John 'Baptift^ or of Jedis, whiift he was a Prophet upon Earth. For Believer^ now of GOD to Manhml. 5 [ now were not only entitled to it, by being Children o^ JbrabcVJ?, or of the TropbetSj by being Ifraelites or Subjects of the Line of i>a'Jid^ or by being Difciples of 'John 'Baptift or of Jefiis j but in as much io they being Partakers of FleJJj and 'Blood, and be alfo taking fart of tbe fame^ (^"^^ing a Son of J bra bam J Rom. i. 4. Heb. ii. 1 1 — 15.) died and revived, that we, through our Relation to him, as the Firft-born among many Brethren (or our elder Brother; through the Spirit of God, which he receiv'd, and then fent from the Father, at his Afcenfion, might be begot- ten to a licely Hope, or become afTured of our Adoption i that is, of our being tbe Sons, and confequently tbe Heirs of God, and joint Heirs •Witb Jefus Cbrift^ Rom. viii. ty — 18. Or as it is exprefs'd, GaLv.^ 7. God fent forth his Son that ye might receii'e the adoption of Sons. And becaufe ye are Sonf^ God hath fent forth the Spirit of bis Son in- to your Hearts, crying Abba, Father. Thus the Spirit fent down from the Father and the Son, became the Earned: of the heavenly In- heritance to Chriftians, as Canaan^ and the Kingdom of T^az'id, had been to the Ifra- elites before. From this Tim.e God and Fa- ther are not only very often promifcuoufly us'd, but join'd together in Scripture. For though they had been us'd promifcuoufly be- fore, as has been already obfcrved, yet this was little underflood, or at leaft attended to Hz in ^1 An Effay on the jeveral J)ifpenfations in our Saviour's Time,- when through the Corruptions that prevailed, the Tcitrmrchaly Jbrabamick and Tropbelick^ as well as natu- ral Reli-ion, and a fpirituai Mejjlah were fo much forgot, and the temporal Kingdom fo Vv'holly regarded, that our Saviour tells them, that no Alan knows the Father^ face the Son ^ and he to whom the ^on will receal him^ Mat. xi. 27. Beiides, our Adoption \s not only farther fecur'd in Chrift Jefus^ by God's becoming our Father, and our becoming his Sons and Heirs, in the Manner I have juft now men- tion'd i but as Chrift Jefits our elder Brother, and with whom we are joint Heirs, is actually poUefs'd of his Inheritance j and is become the firft Fruits of the Refurrediion, and Afcenfion: He being firft entered into Heaven, and for all Behevers ,♦ (even for thofe, who had only an Adoption in Ahraharn) as the Forerunner : And to us (who have our Adoption in right of being Chrift's Brethren^ as well as in right of being the Children Q){ Ahraharn) as taking Polleifion, and preparing a Place for us : God not having deiign'd to give any thing more to Jhraham , and his fpirituai Seed , before Chrift, than a Title to Life ^ whilft the acftual Poffeftion of Life was refer ved for one, that was far more Righteous than Abraham^ who was perfedly and completely fo, even Chrift the Righteous. So that as Death adually en- ter'd by Adarns Sin, Life at^ually enters by Chrift's of GOD to Mankind. 5 5 Chrift's Obedience : Notwithftanding that a Title to Life was given to Jbraham^ and his fpiritual Seed before. And in this Senfe 1 un- derhand St. ^mil^ Rom.y. 12 21. But farther, we are not only entitled to the Inheritance by our Adoption in Chrift Jeftts^ but as it is a Reward given us by the fame Law of this Kingdom, that prefcribes our Duty, as the Terms of obtaining that Reward. This Law muft therefore be confidered as a Cove- nant, fince it does not only prefcribe our Du- ty, and entitle every faithful Subject to a ge- neral Protection • (which every Kingdom pro- pofes to its Subjeds) but to the fpecial Re- ward of a glorious and eternal Life, from the unfpeakable Bounty and Munificence of our heavenly King. And farther, this Law muft likewife be coniider'd as a Covenant, which Chrift has mediated between God and us. In every well conftituted Kingdom, Law and Compad is the Security of the Subjed: ,- not only of fuch as preferve their Duty and Allegiance, but of fuch as have fallen into Re- bellion and Revolt. How much more muft the Law and Covenant of this Kingdom be thought to be fuch a Security, when we con- fider it as mediated by one of fo great Power and Dignity, as the fecond Perfon in it. But we m.ay be ftill farther aiiur'd, that the Law of this Kingdom fiiall have its full Force and Effect, fince the Mediator of the Covenant is made the King of this Kingdom, and is in aCtii- ^^ An Eflay on the fever al 'DifpeHfatms adual PdfTeirion of it, for our Benefit, and ap- pointed by the Father to keep PolTellion, and to prepare a Place for us. And in order to the better adminiftring, it has all Power over all I'hings in Heaven and Earth put into his Hands (as the King of his Church) him on- ly excepted, who has put all things under him. He has like wife all Judgment commit- ted to him, in order to judge and determine of the Actions of all Men, to pronounce Sen- tence on them, and to award Execution at the Confummation of all things. To which end, the Gofpel affures us, that he will raife the Wicked as well as the Juft, in order to his p'afTing this final Judgment. So that he has not only Life, but a Power to give an endlefs Life, and inflidt the fecond Death, according to 'cj^bat Men bace dene in the FleJJj^ whether it he good^ cr whether it he e'vil. This Kingdom, and univerfal Power, Chrift has alfo obtained on a Covenant between th6 Father and himfelf, znz. becaufe he was [or became] the Son of Man^ John v. 27. And he having performed the Condition, which in other Words v;as his taking Flefli, and ^Y'^Vi'^ on the Crofs, cannot fail of having this King- dom and Power confirm'd to him, as the Re- ward of his Obedience. So that coming to his Kingdom and Power on the Terms of fo pain- ful a SubmiiTion to the Will of his heavenly Father, he is often reprefented as coming to them by Purclwfe 5 and as purchafmg his Church, of GOD to Manhnd. 55 Church, theSubjeds of this Kingdo.m, whom his Power is to fecure, (from the Bondage of Sin and Satan^ and its Wages^ Death) with his own l^lood^ Ac^ts xx. 2S. Ephef i. 14. Whereas God only purchas'd or redecm'd the People of his earthly Kingdom to himfcif from B^yptian Bondage, by almighty Tower^ and an oiit-ftr etched Arm^ Exod. xii. 6. Dcut. iv. 20. and y.yiy^\\, 6. Tfalm Ixxii. 2. And the Security, which we may fuppofc Chrift to have acquir'd by his purchafing us with fo great a Price, muft needs be our Security too,- iince he is our immediate King, and we arc immediately his People, and the Lot of his Inherit ance-i Ephef. i. 14. But left any Sufpicion ihould yet remain in the Minds of guilty Men (who are ever full of all pofTible Mifgivings) of what might be the Event ^ fmce after all God is greater than the King of this Kingdom, or the Mediator of this Covenant ,• and that he \s alv/ays confi- der'd as the offended Party ^ left any Jealoufy, I fay, lliould lurk in our Minds on this ac- count, Chrift is repreftnted not only as the King of this Kingdom, but as the High-frieft of our ProfelUon, offering himfeif to God as a Sacrifice of a fv/eet fmclling Savour by the eternal Spirit, and powerfully intercecding as an Advocate with him, in virtue of that Sacri- £ce, in order to obtain all BJelfings from him, and difpenling them to \\^ -^ and ixe are jure that God alv)ays heartth him. From this Con- ^6 An Effay on the fever al 'Difpenfations Confideration it is, that we are commanded to pray to the Father in his Name ; Coming to God through an Interccilbr being a proper Support of the Faith of fach who have been guilty : As we may all fee by confuhing our pwn Minds, or the Hiftory of Mankind, even when we are only guilty to one another. Be- iides, that it is but fit and congruous, that if the Father difpenfes his Bleilings to us by the Son, we fliould offer up our Sacrifices of Pray- er and Praifes by him aifo. And it fecms too, that Chriil: being our High-priefl:, and pre- fcnting himfelf a Sacrifice to God for us, is ai- fo defign'd to fliew us the HoHnefs of the Su- preme and Subordinate King of this Kingdom j and of the Law he has fet us, and to furnifla us with powerful Motives to obey them. But that we may have all poifible Affurance, that God will hear Chrifl: at ail times, we have the ftrongeft Proofs that he has heard him. For on praying the Father for the Spirit, as he faid he would, Jobn xiv, 1 6. he received it, and fent jt down on his JpoftleSy and firji ^jfciples in proper Proportions and Degrees, as he had before promifcd. Thus this Spirit was firft in Promifc, and then in Fad an Affu- rance, that God had heard Chrift; and a ^Pitclgc^ tliat he would hear him in all his In- tercciiions for us. This Oflice of an High prieft \s, alfo farther coniirm'd to him, and confcquently to us, by the Oath cf Goa j who has fworn to him. Thou art of GOD to Mankind. 5 7 art a Trieft for e-ver after the Order of Mel- chizedcck, ^/^r/. ex. 4. Heh. vii. 21. That fo hy tziDO jmmiitahlc things^ by which it is im- pojjibk for God to lie^ "dOe might ha^jeftrovg Coufolation^ i^ho hai'e fled for Refuge to lay hold upon the Hope fet before lis. By all thcfe Ways wc are aflur'd of its be- ing God's good Pieafure to give us the King- dom. But yet left after all we fhould have any doubt of the Sufficiency of Chrift*s Power, or of his Intereft to prefcrve us to it, and we fliould imagine, that any might be able to pluck us out of his Hand, notwithftanding the Kingdom and Power that is thus committed and fecurcd to him ; yet ftill, I fay, as we can't but know, that none can pluck us out of his Father's Hand, we are (to prevent any doubt or fufpicion on this Head) exprefly af- fur'd, that Be and the Father are One^ John X. 34. And that we fliall be kept by the migh^ ty Toziser tfQod through Faith unto Sa hat ton. Oh ! the Height and T)epth^ the Length and ^Breadth., of the Lo've of Chriji that pajjetb Knowledge ! Finally, That thofe who fliould live in the Ages that were diftant from the moft known and important Facets of this Tranfaction, might not have the leaft Hefitation, about the Truth of them (on which the Doctrines and Duties that the Subje(5ts of this Kingdom are to be- lieve and prat^tifc, together with their Hopes, depend) Chrift has inftituted a Feaft at his I Table, 58 An ¥.ffciVon the fever al Tjiffenfations Table, (fuch an or^s as fuits the State of this Kingdom, and the Bulk of the Subjects of it,) as a proper and folemn Memorial to be often repeated, in order to preferve the Evidence of the Truth of thefe Facts in fuch a Manner, as is leafi liable to be counterfeited, (accompanied with Words which demonftrate the Infiitutor of this Feaft to be the High-prieft of our Pro- fefiion, and the Prince of our Salvation) ana- logous to the PalTover^ the mofl folemn Feaft of the earthly Kingdom, and calculated to raife the mofl: proper Sentiments in our Minds to- wards him, and all our Fellovv Subjeds, till the Lord himfcif ccmes the JecondTime^with- Gut a Sacrifce for Sin unto Salvation, To which purpofe, as well as thofe of offering up pur joint Prayers and Praifes, and Alms, and of admoniiliing one another in his Name, Chriftians muft alTemble themfelvcs together in a decent and orderly Manner. All the Texts that relate to ftrgicing Sin^ and imputing Right eon fnefs ; or that [peak of the liigbteoiifnefs of God^ or :f Faith^ or of Faith working by Lote^ or of the Works of Faith y or £/f/ibraham, or of our being jnfti- fed by Works ^ are to be underftood either to relate to the Covenant with Abraham^ or to the State of the Kingdom of Heaven. From this Tim.e forward this heavenly Kingdom became fo eminently the Kingdom of Gcd, and the Si,bjeCts of it fo eminently his People [the Aao^ that Jhould be born'] that ' the of GOD to Mankind, 59 the other low earthly Kingdom dcfigncd chief- ly to prepare things lor this, and his earthly People the Subjects of that Kingdom are fcarce ever confidcr'd : Though that earthly King- dom continued, and the Jews remain'd the Subjeds of it for near forty Years after Chrift's Afcenlion to his Throne j God afi'ording them that Time and Opportunity to enter into his fpiritual and heavenly Kingdom, and giving them the laft and moft dcmonftrative Evidence of their Obligations to enter into it by the Conviiftions of the Spirit j as well as frefh Mo- tives to that Purpofe, by the Provocation God faw ht to give them to Jealoufy (fome few Years after it had been only offer'd to them) by taking in firft the Devout, and then the Idolatrous Gentiles to be his People, and the Subjects of this heavenly Kingdom ^ who had been till then (a very few excepted; Enemies^ iscalkivg according to the Trince of the Tower of the Jir^ ever lince the Apoftacy foon after the Flood ^ and having a great part of that time been kept feparate from God's People (or the People of his earthly Kingdom) and the Children of his Family, by the ceremonial Law, the Wall of Partition, which immur'd or enclos d the Jews^ and kept out the Gentiles from them, Gal iii. 23. But that Wall of Partition being now to be broken down, and an EnVoaflagc of Peace being to be fent to the Gentiles^ by Teter^ Tatil and "Barnabas^ to perl wade them to be reconciled, and to enter 1 2 into 6o An Eflay on the fever al T>ifj)enfations into his heavenly Kingdom, and fo to become Fellow Members, and Subjedts of that King- dom, (without being fubjecl to the Laws of his earthly Kingdom) with the Remnant of JezjVs that had, or iliould enter into it (and remain Subjeds to the laws of his earthly Kingdom) God's Purpofe took effect, (for who fhall relHl his Will?) And all of them together came to have God for their God in the moft high and exalted Senfe, as they be- came his fpiritual People {by Faith in Chriji JefiiSj Rom. iii. 29. and ix. 24, 25.) the true Jews or Ifrael oj God^ or the Circiimcifion not made with Hands. Rom. ix. 14. Gal. vi. 16. A chofen Generation^ a Koyal Triefthood^ an Holy Nation^ a peculiar (or a purchased) 'Peopk^ I Pet. ii. 9. Both 'Jew and Gentile, Ciraimcifion and IJncircttmcifion^ Barbarian, Scythian, ^ond and Free. For though the Jews had been a holy People from the firf]:, acknowledging the only true God, and the Rule of Virtue, and were at this Time free from Idolatry ,• yet they had ftrangely devi- ated from that Rule to fuperftitious and impi- ous Traditions. But now they were enabled to underftand and obferve the Rule of Virtue far better than ever they had done before ,• (as the Prophet Jeremiah foretold they fliould) and fo became God's People in another Man- ner than they had been his People : Not ac- cording to the Co'venant oj the Tables of Stone ^ Init by putting his Laws into their inward TartSy of GOD to Mankind. 6 1 TartSy and writing them in their Hearts^ Jer. xxxi. 31. quoted Heh. viii. 10. and allu- ded to 2 Cor. iii. 3 10. And as thtjews now became more eminently Holy j fo the Gentiles now firft became [Saints, or] Holy, at their bemg tranjlated out of the Kingdom of T)arknefs into this ILingdoyn of Light^ i Cor. i. 2. Ephef. i. i . Then firlt renouncing the Works of T)arknefs^ and feparating themfelves from the reft of the World, which lay in Ido- latry and Vice. From what has been hitherto faid of the ^hrahaynick Covenant, and the Conftituti- on of the heavenly Kingdom, we may fee, that they are the fame in Subftance, and differ chiefly as two Covenants between the Father of a Family and his Children may be fiippo- fed to differ ; the one of which is more fully explain'd, and corroborated than the other : Or as a Covenant between the Father of a Fa- mily and his Children may be fuppofed to dif- fer from the fame Covenant between the fame Parties, confider'd not only as a Father of a Family with his Children , but as a King with his People. In order to give a fuller Security to their Adoption or Inheritance, by Law and Compact, the moft folemnly ratified and con- firmed, fo as to entitle them to their Inheri- tance, not only as their Inheritance, but as their Reward. And from all that has been hitherto faid, we may fee, that the heavenly Inheritance was 67 An EfTay on the fever al Dijpenfdtions was firft intimated to Adam^ and to the Pa- triarchs^ (both by the gracious Difcoveries God made to his own Family, and by the amazing Curfes and Judgments he brought on the Family of the Devil) was expreily promis'd, feafd, fworn and pledg'd to Ahra- hanij and to all his fpiritual Seed through him j (though the Knowledge of the Promife, Seal, Oath and Pledge, was not publifh'd be- yond his Family, and fuch as would come to enquire of that Family about itj was pointed out by the Imperfedion and the Antitype of the 'Jewijlj Conftitution ^ was pledg'd afreili in Promife, by the Covenant with Uat'id.y and in fa<^, to his Seed, who fat for above four hundred Years on his Throne ^ was fore- told by the Trophets^ ('when the former Pled- ges feem'd to fail) as what fliould take Place under the Kingdom of the Mejfiah^ the Son of ^at'id, in the Age to come j was prophe- iied of by John ^aptifi^ as what would be accomplifncd m Jcfus^ wiiom he pointed to as then among them ; was preached by J e fits in the Days of his Fleili, as what would take Place after his being lifted up ^ was actually poilefs'd and enter'd upon by him, and for us, at his Afcenfion, as the Firft-born amonj^ ma- ny (Sons of Abraham^ who were all his) Bre- thren i was fworn to Chrifi ; was fignified by Baptifm j was commemorated by the Lord's Supper ,• and lafl: of all, was feal'd and pledg'd by the Spirit, as a Proof that Chriil has Pow- er of GOD to Mankind. 6 ^ er to give Life, (from his being exalted to all Power both of Government and Judgment,^ and that he will in due Time adually give it his Brethren and Subje(^S5 by that very Spirit by which God rais'd him, and by which he will raile us up from the Dead : By which al- fo fome of the /ipojiles went and preached this whole Doctrine to all the Je^JOs^ and others of them, according to his Command, to all the Qmtiles* Thus God had from the Shedding down of the Holy Ghoft (the firft Adt of Chrid's regal Povv'tr; till the Deftru^ftion of Jerufaiem^ two Kingdoms and two People in the World ^ but of diiferent Kinds, tiz. an earthly and an heavenly one. And though the Subje(5ts of the earthly Kingdom had no Privilege in the heavenly Kingdom, beyond the Gentiles^ who were not Subjects of the earthly Kingdom, be- fides the hrft Offer of entring inro his heaven- ly Kingdom ; yet they continued the Subjects or People of his earthly Kingdom., under his temporal ProteClion, (fuch at icalt as was fuit- ed to the low State of their Fidelity and Obe- dience, and to the wife and merciful Ends of his univerfal Government of the World,) ow- ing and paying Obedience to the Law of his fleilily or carnal Commandments. This muli ncceflarily have been the Cafe, lince his fpiri- tual Kingdom, related wholly to the Minds of Men, 64 An Eflay on the fever al Difpenfations Men, and alter'd nothing in their civil Obliga- tions. Indeed it bound down their Political fas well as Occonomical) Duties more ftrictly upon them. Ro7n. xiii. 1 — 8. i Cor, vii. I c— 2 5. So far was it from diflblving any civil Polity or Government in the World j or theirs in particular. But when after all the moft gracious and condefcending Methods had been try'd, the Subjeds of this earthly Kingdom would not ferve God, and obey the Voice of his Son, the great Prophet^ as they had promis'd they would, as a fundamental Stipulation at the creding the earthly Kingdom, T^eiit, xviii- 15— — -20. Bjxod, XX. 19. JUs iii. 23. Nor would not enter into his heavenly Kingdom, but continued a rebellious and contumacious People for about forty Years, after the erect- ing this Kingdom, (the Time that he had fuf- fer'd the Manners of their Fathers in the Wil- dernefs,) he brought the Teople of the Trince^ (^calTd fo, becaufe he was the Head of the fourth ( or only ) Monarchy then in the World , according to 'Danielh prophetick Language) upon them • as Daniel had fore- told, {Chap. ix. 26.) and as Jefus himfelf fore- told alfo, {Ijuke xix. 41 — 45. and xxi. 20.) and deftroyed them j whereby he abdicated this his earthly Kingdom, affording the Jews no manner of Protection ^ they having entire- ly of GOD to Mankind, 65 ly forfeited it^ and the keeping up that earth- ly Kingdom, being no longer of that ufe to the Je'Ws^ or to the World, for which it was chiefly and ultimately intended ^ now that the heavenly Kingdom had fo fully taken Place: For Chrift ijoas the End of the Law^ Rom. X. 4. And it had been foretold, that when He for whrm the Government was referred [i'JDC, ^v i\% (Z diTOK&ilcii'jJImdd ccme, and the 'People jlmdd he gather d unto him^ the Sceptre fljould depart from Judah, and a Lawgher from between his Feet^ Gen. xlix. i o. according to fome, and thofe I think the beft. Readings of the Septuagint. Whereupon as God ccas'd to be their King, they ceas d to be his People, or to owe any Allegiance to the Laws of his earthly Kingdom ,• and became the avow'd and determin'd Enemies of his heavenly King- dom, Kom. xi. 28. The very Charader of the idolatrous G^/^;t//^j*5 Rom. v. 10,11. From this Time God has had but one Kingdom, and one People in the World, {piz, a heavenly and a fpiritual Kingdom over a wil- ling People) ruling only over the Spirit of their Minds. However, for their ivzf/J7^r'j"y}z/&^ f up- on whofe Account the Ifraelites were firft ta- ken to be a People, Tieiit. iv. 37.) the Jews are ftill fo beloved, that it is probable, there will come a time, according as God feems to have rcvcafd it by his holy Apoftles and Prophets, K * that 66 Ah Eflay o>2 the fever al Diffenfations that they fhall be reftor'd, not only to be his fpiritual Subjeds, but his earthly People again in their own Land. ! the Tiepth of the Riches^ both of the Wifdom and Knowledge of God I How imfearchahlc are his Judgments^ and his Ways pafl findivg out ! This earthly Kingdom however, when re- ftor'd, is to ceafe before the heavenly one. For that will not determine but with the End and Confummation of all God's Difpenfations towards the Children of Men. When all the Enemies of God's Family and Kingdom, and of his Children and People, are to he put wider Chrift's Feet ^ the laft of which JJ?aU he T)eath : Then will his Kingdom ap- pear in its brighteft Glory. Jnci when the Father Jlmll hat'e fuhdtied all Things unto him^ \_Chrift'] then alfo floall the Son himfelf he [iihjeU tinto him \the Father^ that God may he all in all^ i Cor. xv. 25, 265 28. That the one great Defign of Revelation, and the one great Mean, by which that Defign has been purfued in the feveral Difpenfations of God towards Mankind (though difcovered in ^ GOD to Mankind, 67 in different Ages of the World in different AVays) may appear the more clear and perfpi- ciious j 1 will endeavour to draw what I have faid a little clofcr together, in a lliort Recapi- tnlation of the whole. Which is this : I'hat after Adam^ whom God had created innocent or perfect, and whom, as fiich, he had vefted at his Crea- tion with the Inheritance of an animal, ter- reftrial Glory , Dominion , Blifs and Im.- mortality, (by which he became the Son of Qod^ Luke iii. ult.) and that not only for himfelf, but for his Pofterity, had forfeited it for them as well as for himfelf^ by eating of the Tree of Death, or of the Knowledge of Good and E^'il^ in difcbedience to God's ex- prefs Command, and in compliance with the Temptation of the Devil : It being the good Pleafure of God, I fay, that Adam^ who had been thus his Son by Creation, with all his Defcendants, the Sons of Men, iliould not finally continue the Children of that apoftate Spirit, and fo remaining under the Power of Death, have their Portion with him in the 'BlachiefsofT)arhie[sfore'je)\ through De- fpair of ever diverting the Difpleafure of their Maker ^ or through their being without a well grounded Hope of obtaining a Recompence fuflficicnt to fupport them in a conffant Courfe of Self-denial and Obedience; God was merci- fully pleafed to give fome Intimations to Adam and the Tatriarchs^ (particularly to Enoch K 2 and 68 An ^ihy on the fever at ^ifpenfations and Noah^ that He would become a Re- warder after Death [or a Father] of all thofe who fliould diligently feek after his Will and obey it. I mean that Will of his written in their Hearts^ or imparted by Revelation, re- lating to their Temper and Condnd, which was fo perfediy fuited to theii' Nature and Circumflances, as to render it fit for them to fearch after and obey it, abftraded from all Coniiderations of this future Reward. On the other Hand, God alfo gave feverai Jnftan- ces of his high Difpleafure againft the Family oiCain and Canaan^ (which are to be coniider- ed in their refpedive Ages, as the avowed Fa- milies of the i)etuly) and againft fuch as min- gled w^ith them, (who rejevSled and defpifed all the gracious Intim.ations of his Purpofe of adopting the Children of Men,) thereby the better to keep the Children of his own Fami- ly in a juft Awe and Fear of Him. And to the Intent, that he misht at the fame Time aifure them the more effectually ot that his mioft gracious Purpofe, he after- wards in great Tendernefs and Condefcenii- on, vouchfafed to make an exprefs Covenant with Abraham^ the Father of ail the Faithful j in regard of his lingular and unexampled Truft in the Power of God, and Obedience to his Will, in the moft trying Inftances, that he would Ado-pt him to the Inheritance of a glo- rious, Ipiritual, and ccleftial Kingdom, Blifs and immortality, infinitely exceeding the In- heritance 1 of GOD to Mankind. 69 herkance which Mankind loft by the Difobe- dience of the Father of all the Licing. God was moreover pleafed to sive Ahraham the Promife of Canaan^ as a promis d Pledge of his performing that better Promife ^ and Cir- cumcilion^ as a Seal to both thefe Promifes : And was alfo pleafed to ratify the Perfor- mance of them by an Oath. Nor did he make this Promife to Jhraharn alone, but in making it to him, he made it to all the Men of all the Families of the Earth, in ail Age.s, that fliouid become his Seed j that is^ that fhouid imitate his Faith and Obedience. He afterwards alfo, for feveral wife Re2- fons, erected this Family, and fuch as would joyn thcmfclves to them, into an earthly Ki:?^ dom^ fo conftitutec, as to point out a better i and as in many proper Ways to prepare Men and difpofe Things for the Eftabliiliment of it^ and to anfwer many other great Ends, both to them and the World, in their own Time, and in all future Ages. He alfo gave them the actual PolTeiTion of Canaan \ and after- wards made a Covenant, concerning the Fa- mily of Tiai'ld^ ( and confirm'd it by an Oath,) as Pledges of the Performance of this betteiS^ Promife. And after the unpromiimg adverfe or defperate Circumftances of the Jewijlo Nation, made both the Pledges feem to lofe their Force with the Jcdi's^ this Hope was kept alive by Prophecies of the latter Prophets of a better Kingdom under the Mef- iiah; yo An Eflay on the fever al Difpenfations fiah i efpeciaily in the Minds of fuch, as would become the Children of the Prophet s^ and imi- tate them in the Faith of thefe Predictions. And to the Intent, that he might in due Time alTure this Inheritance to them in a clearer and ftronger Manner, than he had done by the In- timations to the Patriarchs, by the Covenant with Jbrahanh as the Father of a fpiritual Family or Seed, or by the Covenant of Sinai^ or of "Da-vid^ or by the latter Prophets, he firft feat his holy Child Jeftis to allljre them of this, as a Prophet and Teacher of a higher kind than he had ever fent before j and to give us a clear Rule and a perfed Example of fuch a Righteoufnefs, (after the Forgivenefs of what was pad,) as would entitle us to this Inheritance, Whom, after that He had be- come obedient to Death, God raifed from the Dead, and gave him Glory ^ erecting a King- dom under him, as the Firft-born among ma- Xiy Brethren ^ conftituting him for this high and voluntary Ad of Obedience, in fuffering Death, the Heir and Lord of all things j that fo if the Jews^ or others, (whether they were already his adopted Children or not, ) on a Meflage fent to them from himfelf by the Jpoflles of Chi'lft Jefiis^ would now become the faithful Subjeds of this his heavenly King- dom, and be pnblickly tranflated into it by Baptifm, they ihould both be recovered from Death, the Appointment of the Sons of Men, and faved from Wrath to comiC, or the fecond Death, of GOD to Mankind. 7 1 Deaths the Portion and Reward of the Fa- mily and Kingdom of the Devil ,• and alfo have this heavenly Inheritance much more firmly fecured to them in right of Children, by Adoption in jlhrdham^ as the Father of the Faithful. For Chrift was a Child o{ Abraham^ ptitt'mg his Trtift in God^ Heb. xi. 1 3. and was adually raifed from the Dead, and confcquently became their elder Brother. He alfo became their elder Brother on another Confideration^ ifpenfatwns Corollary IL From what has been faid, we may fee, what Relation Faith bears to the Religion of the Means [Mean] ; Or of what Ufe Faith is in reveard Religion. The Religion of the Means [Mean] as it has been juft now ftated, is the Method which God has taken to make Men Religious, by revealing certain Propofitions to them. Now Faith, as it is here underftood,' is the AfTent of the Mind to the Truth of thofe Propofitions on divine Teftimony,- without which, thofe Propofitions could have no force on us. How vain then is the Objedion of the Deifts, that Chriftians afcribe a great deal too much to Faith, as it is here underftood, be- caufe Faith in this Senfe, fas muft be allow'd) is no Virtue. They pretend that Faith in this Senfe is fuppofed to fave Men ■ and that Men are fuppofed to be damned for the want of it. Whereas really Faith is reprefented of no ufe in the Religion of the Means [Mean] but what it muft necelfarily be of. For Faith is juft of fo much ufe to the Believer, as the Pro- pofition believed has a Tendency to promote his Virtue and Happinefs. He that believes fuch a Propolition has all the Advantage of that good Tendency of the Proposition, from his Belief of it. He that does not believe fuch a Propofttion, cannot have that Advantage. Thus of GOD to Mankind. 79 I'hus for Inftance, he that believes that eternal Life, as it is defcrib'd in Scripture, will be the Inheritance of a Child of God, has all the Motive to \'irtue and Piety, and all the Com- fort that a Belief of that Propoiition rauft neccll'arily give him. He that does not be- lieve that Propoiition, muft want that Com- fort, and that Motive. So that here is no- thing attributed to Faith, as it is here un- dcritood, but what necellarily flows from it : And which is no more than v/hat the Deifts attribute to Knowledge in natural Religion^ tho' Knowledge is no more a Virtue than Faith, but bears exactly the fame Relation to natural Religion, that Faith does to reveal'd Religion, For Religion, whether natural or reveal d, muft begin in Knowledge or in Faith, and mull from hence fettle in Temper, and fo hold on in Practice, that is ever to end in the Re- wards refulting from Virtue, in the Reafon of Things,- or in thofe Rewards which God has wifely and bountifully annexed to Virtue and Piety, by the Revelation he has made of his Will, hideed if any would carry this a iittle farther, it may juflly be faid, that Chri- ftians afcribe no more to Faith in reveal'd Re- ligion, not only, than the Deifts do to Know- ledge in natural Religion ; but than the Atheifts do to Knowledge in relation to moral cr political Good and hvil. C o R. o L- 8o An Eflay on the fever al T)ifpenfations Corollary III. Though the Means of Religion (which i«; but in other Words the Rehgion of the Means) have been fomevvhat different in refped of Clearnefs, Certainty and Accommodation to the different Circumftances of Mankind in different Ages,- yet thefe Means of Reh'gi- on have always been beautifully proportion- ed to the State of Things, and to each other. I mentioned thefe Proportions in the Preface, and referr'd the Reader hither. I will now point out iome of thofe Proportions (among nuffibcrlcfs which occur) in three of thefe Means of Religion ; or if you will, in the one great Mean of Religion, differently exhibited and afcertain'd in three different Difpenfations ^ namely, the annexing Life as the promis'd Re- ward, or Inheritance belonging to Righteouf- nefs (in order to keep or make Men righte- ous) under the Difpenfation of Innocence, of Abraham^ and of Chriji : Some of thofe Pro- portions ffand thus. — - The Continuance of an animal Life, in a grofs terreftrial and cor- ruptible Body, cloath'd however with a Glo- ry, and accompany'd with the Dominion and Blifs of an earthly Paradife, and the high Pri- vilege of converfing fometimes with the She- chiuah^ was promifed to the rird: Adam (who had no Father but God) in Innocence, or a State of GOD to Mankind. 8 1 State of Trial, on his paying perfect Obedi- ence to the Law that he was under, without paffing through Death to it ; and a Power in fome fort to tranfmit fuch a Life, in a Body like his own, to his Poftcrity. A future endlefs Life, in a fpiritual, celeftial, powerful and glorious Body, accompanied with the Kingdom, Glory and Blifs of Heaven, where we arc always alfo to behold the Glory of God, and fee him as he is, without being fubjeCt to any future Trial, after being a long time under the Power of Death and Corrup- tion, was firft intimated upon the Lofs of the earthly Paradife to JJa?n, and all his Sons, that were fincere ; and was afterwards more cxpreily promifcd to Jbra/jmn^ for the fake of his eminent Sincerity (which under the Name of Faith God counted for Rightcouf- nefs) and to all his Sons or Seed ; or to all Men of any other Family performing {incere Obedience to the fame Law : The Reward of Heaven, though greater than that of Paradife, being unfeen and future ,• and the Obedience that Man pays lince the Fall, though imper- fect, being at leaft equal to the perfed: Obedi- ence in Innocence, and in the PoflTefiTion of Pa- radife, coniidering the Weaknefs of Men's Reafon, and Faith, and the Strength of their Appetites and PafTions. However, this Pro- mife was then publiflied to none, but the Fa- mily of this fincerely righteous Man ; Of which indeed fuch o'i other Families as would, M might 8 1 An Effay on the jeveral ^ifpenfattons might enquire about it. ?— — - But the higheft heavenly Life and Glory, after a fliort Death, without feeing Corruption, and an univerfal Power and Dominion is aCl;ually conferred on the feccnd AdaVfi^ the holy Jefus^ (a Son of ^add by his Mother, bi:t who had no Fa- ther but God) of the fpiritual as well as car- nal Seed of Ahraham^ the only begotten Son of God, and the Firft-born or Begotten of all his Brethren from the Dead, (and therefore by Nature, and the higheft Preheminence, the ScncfGcd) in order to his recovering all to Life, and to his ^ivin^ that cndiefs Life in a Body forra'd and failiion'd by his Spirit, like his own Body, to all the lincere (h\s younger Brethren) whether Jews or Qentiles^ (ac- cording to God's Offer and Promife pubiilhed by his Command to all,) and in Order to his fentencing the Insincere (the Children of the Devil) to the fecond Death : Whilft this Life, and the Power of giving Life, \^ given to him, not only for his being perfe(5tly righteous, or pbedicnt to the fame Law, in Fieili, that we are under ^ but for his having alfo perform/d a perfed Obedience to a peculiar and a higher Law that he voluntarily put himfclf under, even that of the greateft Self-denial and Abafcmcnt j particalarly emptying himfeif of his Glpry, taking the Falliion ot a Man, and the Form of a Servant, and becoming obedient to Death, even the Death of the Crofs, in or- der to make Men linccrely Righteous ^ that is. of GOD to Mankind. 8j is, conformed to that lower Law of Self-de- nial and Abafement^ (or that lower Rule of Righteoufnefs) which they arc under. Corollary IV. That the Father fliould fend the Word to take Flefli, to live a mean Life, and die an ignominious Death, has been the Aftonilliment of Angels and Men. I have hinted in the Pre- fece, that to fay, that Jefiis came to give a new Publication of natural Religion, will not account for that amazing Phrtnomenon. For why might not an inferior Being, or a meer Man, that never exifted before, as the Socini- cns reprcfent Chrift to have been, have given us fuch a Pubhcation, as a Prophet fent from God ? Could not a mcer Man, or an inferior Being, have fet us an Example? Allured us of the Forgivenefs of Sins that were pad ? Or of all neceliary Alliftance for the Time to come ? Could not an holy Man have been raifed from the Dead, and thereby have afTur'd us, that human Nature might revive ? Some indeed have ailed ^ed other Reafons for this ^reat Tranfaction : But I mufl: leave them who offer thofe Reafons to fupport them. A Matter of this Confequence muft not be trufted to difputable Points. In the mean time, \i the ^reat End of the Chriflian Revelation be what 1 have reprefented it in this Ellay, and hinted M 2 ' in 84. An Eflay on the fever al J)ifpenfations in the foregoing Corollary, -v/z, to affure us in the fulleft Manner that could be, (after the prior Afliirances of a lower Nature which had been given) of eternal Life, as it is defcribed in Scripture, and in a Way fuited to the Rea- fon and Proportion of Things ^ it may let us into fome further Account of this wonderful Appearance ; or at leaft fet it in a fuller Light. For who was fo fit for the Father to make us his adopted Sons by, after we were become the Children of the Devil , and Heirs of Death and Wrath , as his only begotten Son ? Who was fo fit for the living God to give us eternal Life by, as he, to whom he had given to have Life in him- felf, (and to whom alone that high Privilege feems fit to be granted) and who we might therefore be affured, was able to give it to us? yobn vi. 40 '57* Who was at all fit to receive the eternal Spirit of the everlafting Fa- ther, in order to give it to Jewijh and Gentile Believers, as the Earneft of eternal Life, but he that was produc'd before the Creation, [^'?!rpu)lQ'TCfcog '^ctoY\c, y,1i(7iu)g^ Colof i. 15.] and the Firft-born from the Dead, and thereby had in all Things the Preheminence ? His well belo- ved Son, in whom he was always well pleafed, GaL iv, 6, And who was fo fit to be entrufted with that univerfal Power of Government and Judgment, that was necelTary to fecure to us, in the fulleft Manner, the future Polleffion of eternal Life, as he, that was the Heir of all Things ? of GOD to Mankind. 85 Things?' Tbe Word j, who was before all Things J who was with God, and wasGcc?^ hy whom all Things were made ; the 'Bright- nefs of his Father''s Glory^ and the exprefs Image of his TerfcnM^ ^^f,t:(^^i!i:^^^' ^' Farther, how fit and congruous was it for the Son of God to take Flelli, in which Ap- petites and Pafiions had had the Afcendant, to the lofing Life, in order to his regaining Life by perfect Self-denial and Obedience f Rom. viii. 2. To the Intent that we mi^ht fee, that being confornaed to him in fuch a Degree ot Self-denial and Obedience as was required of us, was the only Way to recover a better Life than that, which had been loft by the undue Indulgence which our firft Parents ijpen fat ions denial, Holinefs^ and voluntary Abafement in Flefli, for the Good of Mankind, he is be- come the Firft-born from the Dead, has a glo- rious Body, and in that glorious Body enjoys the higheft Degree of heavenly Glory, Honour and Power? Or what can be a greater Securi- ty to us, than this Advancement of his, that upon our being conformed to him in the Like- nefs of his Life and Death, we fliall alfo be conformed to him in the Glory of his Refur- redion ? Corollary V. The fifth Corollary is, That on perufing this fhort Syftem of Revelation, a very pro- per Way naturally offers it felf of examining Revelation, and the View I have given of it. Revelation is fuppofed, according to what has been alrcadv faid of the Religion of the Means, to be an extraordinary Difcovcry God has mercifully made, to afliil: Mankind to a(5t rea- fonably, or according to the Truth of Things, under the Weaknefs of their Reafon, and the Strength of their Appetites and Palllons, in the low Situation of reafonable Beings, in which Mankind feems to be placed. Let Revelation then be examined by the Dellreablenefs of the End, (in which it entirely agrees with natural Religion,) by the Fitnefs of the one great Mean it has all along propofed for attaining that of GOD to Mankind, 87 that End ^ by the Fitnefs of the various Me- thods by which that one great Mean has been exhibited to Mankind, in their various Cir- cumitances, in the feveral Ages of the World ; and by the Beauty and Proportion of the Re- lations, which thofe Methods bear to each other ; And then let the Syftem which I have ofter'd beexamin'd by its Coniiftency with Re- velation, and with it felf. If Revelation will bear an Examination by thefe Criteria^ no reafonable Man can doubt, w^hether that Re- velation be of God ^ nor Vvhether the Repre- fentation that I have here given of Revelation, agrees in the Main with it. We all allow an Hypothehs of Nature to be a true Hypothciis, if it agrees with Nature, and folves all its Th(£iwmena conliftently, as far as we are ac- quainted with them. Cartes beautifully fays fom.e where, that if a Man fiiould happen to hnd out a Key that would decypher a Letter, writ to him in a Cypher, by a Friend, fo as to make it fait the Character and Circura fian- ces of both the Corrcfnondents, we mi£!ht cer- tainly conclude it was the Key by which it had been writ. Hov/ much more then may we be alTured of this in Revelation, where we have all the 1)ata before us c^ Which I fuppofe are many more than we have to examine an Hy- pothelis of Phiiofophy by. In both thefe Ca- fes we go upon this f ire Principle, that Fa lie- hood will not appear to agree far with Truth • any more than a crooked Eine will appear (even 88 An Eflay on the fever al Difpenfations (even to no better Eyes than ours) to agree in many Points with a ftreight one. But if the Rule of Revelation be farther extended than that of Nature, it will fooner difcover any Deviation. But I forbear to add more on this Head j having anticipated my felf, in a good Meafurej in the Preface. Nor would it have been fo proper to have faid any Thing on the internal Evidence of Revelation here, were It not to connci^t it Vv?ith what I am going to fay of its external Evidence ; and fo to endea- vour to reprefent the Force of the whole Evi- dence for Revelation in one iTiort view. And when a rcafonable Man lays both of them be- fore himfelf in this manner, how will he be able longer to withiland it ? By the external Evidence of Revelation, I mean the Marks of great Power or Know- ledge, or Wifdom , which accompany it : Namely, the Miracles, which firft attended mediate or traditionary Revelation in the Cafe ot 31ofes ; and afterwards of J efiis of Naza- reth ; and then Prophecy, which follow'd in the Religion o'i Mofes j and all the prophetick Gifts of ieveral Kinds, and in the higheft De-. grees, Vv'hich follow'd in the Religion o^Je- J/iSj on his Afceniion to the right Hand of Power i and which muft be allow'd to be the grcatcft of all the external Evidences ; whe- ther Vv-e coniider the Nature of thefe Gifts (they being not only Marks of the greateft Power and Knowledge, but of the greateft Wifdom ^/ G O D to Mankind, 89 Wifdom too, being fit means to fpread the Knowledge of the Chriftian Religion) or the Reprefentations which the New Teilament gives of them. If any fiiould pretend that they don't receive the Bible, becaufe they have not leiihre to confider the external Evi- dence there is for its being a divine Revela- tion • let them conlider the internal Evidence, which will take up lefs time ; and then no want of Icifure can be pretended as an Excufe. But above all, let him take care how he re- jects Revelation, who has Leifure and Ability to confider both. For if a Train of diftind Marks of Power, of Knowledge, and of Wif- dom, above what is Human • and if Marks of the greateft Power, Knowledge and Wifdom, all joyn'd together in the Gifts of the Holy Ghoft, are not fufficient to atteft that the wifeft Mean, ( exhibited differently, but properly and proportionably to Mankmd, under diffe- rent Circumftances in different Ages) in order to attain the moft defirable End, is from God j when this End and Mean fufficiently recom- mend themfelves to us, without that Attefta- tion, we feem to put it out of the Power of God to give us the Favour of a Revelation. For what can be the Stamp of Divinity upon a Revelation, that is it felf every AVay worthy of God , if Marks of the greateit Power, Knowledge, Wifdom and Goodnef;, both ill a long Succefnon, and in Conjunction, be not ? Let thofe who rejcift fuch a Revelation, N take <)0 An YS^yon the feveral T)iffenfatlons take care , left it be their Condemnation , that Light is come into the Worlds hut that Men lo^'e T>arknefs rather than Lights he- caitfe their Tweeds are evil ! Corollary VI. When reveal'd Religion appear'd in all this full Luftre of internal and external Evi- dence, as it did in the Times of the Apoftles, the Time when Revelation was fully corn- pleated, it muft certainly have had very great Effects on Mankind, in informing their Minds, and regulating their Lives. And therefore, as on the one Hand, if there had been no fuch Effe<5ts produced, it would be unnatural to fuppofe, that the Dodtrines of Revelation ever could have had this internal and external Evi- dence ; fo on the other Hand, the Accounts we have in the Hiftory of the JBs and Epi^ JikSy and in the Writings of the Cotempora- ries, and immediate Succeffors of the Jpoftks^ of the great Effects it actually produc'd in all the Places where it came, is a further Evi- dence of the Truth of reveal'd Religion : Since by thefe Hiftories it appears, that the EflFecSs which were wrought by Revelation in all this Clcarnefs and Strength of internal and exter- nal Evidence, were in Kind and Degree, juft what one would naturally expe^^ from that Evidence. C O R O JLt of G OD to Mankind, 9 1 Corollary VII. Such a Defign, fuch a Mean, fuch Methods of difcovering that Mean to Mankind, fo re- lated, fo proportion Vi to tlr State of Man- kind, and to each other, fucn well attefted Inftances of Power, KnowledgCj and Wifdom accompanying them, and fuch Succefs attend- ing them, are the true and infallible Marks of a Revelation from God ; every I'hing concur- ring, that we can now fuppofe about it, either a Trior! ^ or a Tofteriori, What more can be deiired to fet the Truth and Excellency of divine Revelation in the mofl: glaring Light, than to obteft and conjure reafonable Men to compare it with the pretended Revelations either of former or later 'I imes ? And to fee, whether they will bear a Trial by thefe Marks, or any Comparifon with the Bible? Beginning from the monftrous, inconliftenf, immoral 'I'heology of the Pagans, till we go through the almoft equally abfurd Syftem of Alous of the firfl Hereticks, and come down to that of Mahomet^ or of the Koman Aiiti- chrift ; and of thofe that have mix'd any of her Corruptions, or their own with the Word of God i even after all the Refinements, any of thefe feveral Syftems have undergone by the greateft Wits, that have patroniz'd them in the feveral Ages of the World. The bare N 2 men- ^2 An Eflay on the fever al ^ijj^enjations mention of fadi of thefe Syftems, as are made up of nothing at all, or of little elfe, but Faliliood, makes a Trial of them by thefe Cri- teria entirely ncedlefs j and a fiirther Compari- fon between them and the Bible perfcdly ridicu- lous : To any other Purpofe at lead, than that of a Foil, which it don't at all want. And as this can't be the Place of making a Trial, and Comparifon between the Bible, and thefe Schemes, where there is more Truth mix'd with Falfiiood in various Proportions and Degrees ^ fo it will not be difficult for thofe to make this Trial or Comoarifon, who are well acquainted with any of thefe compound- ed Syllems, and with the fimple and unm.ix'd Syfcem of the Bible. All that I Ihall add is, That Revelation ftands in a proportionable Degree of Oppofition to every falfe Religion, to the Degree of Faliliood which they contain ^ and m Conjunftion Vv'ith them, fo far as they have any Mixture of Truth ,• as Herefy always has. In fo much that it aims at nothing lefs than the total Subverilon of the Pagan Iheo- logy, by recalling Men from the Worfliip of many Gods , through many Mediators or Lords, but all of them Patrons of Vice, to the Worfnip of the One only true God, by one Lord or Mediator, even Jefus Cbrift the 'Righteous^ who ckaujes us from all Sin ■ Whilft it directs us , only to purge out the Leaven of Error, Hypocrify and Malice that is in Herefy, in order that we may be- come of G OD to Mankind. 9 g come an unleavened Lump of Sincerity and IVuth. Corollary VIII. If we compare Revelation with natural B.e- ligion (which the Deifts with us allow to be true Religion,) they arc, as to the Religion of the End the liime ; that is, the Duties that arc due to God, to our fclves, and to one ano- ther, in both of them are cxadly the very fame ; and whatever has been revealed in any Age of the World, as a Mean to attain that End, has had a natural Fitnefs to promote that End , in the Circumfiances Men then were ; though they might not probably have hit upon that Mean : Nor could they without Revelation have ever been aiiin-Vj, that it was a true one. For though every one fees, that the Rev/ard of eternal Life, Dominion and Glory, not fubjcd to any future State of 1 ri- al, and the peculiar Biifs that refults fi^om them, is the moft proper Means to promote Virtue • yet how fhould we know, that they would be the Reward of Virtue, if God had not revealed it to us ? Or how, on the other Hand , could v/e have known unlets God had revealed it to us, that wicked Men fliould be raifcd from the Dead, and after a Trial, according to their Works (by which the Re- ward of eternal Life is very much heightncd) be 94- ^^2 EfTay on the fever al Dijpenfations be fentenced to the fecond Death. Though now we know it, every one muft allow it to be a powerful Motive to Obedience. And the fame may be faid of all the reft of the peculiar Dodrines or Precepts of Revelation. As the Doctrine of Mediation, and the Inftitution of Baptifm, and the Lord's Supper ; as I have endeavoured to make appear in the Courfe of this Eilay ; Since natural Religion then is on | all Hands allowed to be true, is it not raoft highly probable, that revealed Religion is al- fo true, from this Confideration alone, that revealed Religion has the greateft Fitnefs to promote natural Religion , in thole Points, where they don't coiiicide c^ Where one Thing has a Tendency to promote another Thing, we conclude that they ftand related as End and Mean in other Cafes, both in the natural and moral World ^ and why then fliould we not in this ? Beiides natural and reveaFd Re- liction agree thus far farther : That reveal'd Religion is as fit as a Mean j as natural Re- ligion is deiireable as an End : And that as natural Religion may be reduced to one Endj fo revealed Religion, in that which is peculiar to it, may be reduced to one Mean ; namely, difcovering to us the moft powerful Mo- tive of Obedience, t^iz. the Promife of eternal Life, heightned by its being a Salvation from, the fecond Death. So that, on the whole, the Bible appears to contain a Revelation from God, whether we confidcr it, in it felf. of GOD to Mankind, 5 5 (;'. ^ in the internal and external Evidence which attends it,) or if we compare it with falfe Religions, or with the true. It ftands in the greateft Oppofition to the one, and in the moil clofe and the only proper Relation to the other : That is to fay, of a mod ufeful Mean to attain it. Corollary IX. If the Deift lliall ftill ailed ge, after all that has been faid, that natural Religion don't want the Aid of thofe fupernatural Motives, fince it contains Motives of its own, both ot Rewards and Puniiliments, from the necellary Confequences of Things, fufficient to fupport Virtue: All that needs be added, is, 'J hat more Motives will beget more Virtue. And that Revelation furniilies us with an additi- onal Motive, and of greater Force, than natu- ral Religion furnifhes us with, will not be de- nied by any one, on the Suppofition that the Bible is a Revelation from God. For it ac- quaints us, that Death is the PuniOimeiit of Sin, that the Wicked fliall rife and undcr.go a Trial, and receive a Doom to unfpeakable pofitive Mifery j but that the Righteous ilia II not only efcape the Anxiety of a Trial of un- certain Event, ( from the Confcioufnef:^ of their own Integrity,) and the Shame and An- guiili of a SentenCv of Condemnation ; but tha vvhe 96 An EiTay on the fever al T>'tffenfaUons when the Heavens are to be roll'd up like a Scrowl, when the Elements are to melt with fervent Heat, and when the Earth, with all its Works, are to be confamed and burned up, and the Wicked fliall be overtaken by this univerfal Conflagration, that God will find out a Way for the Efcape and Salvation of the Righteous. Revelation farther allures us, in the clearcll and ftrongeft Manner, that they fliall, in celeftial, fpiritual, glorious and pow- erful Bodies, inherit the Kingdom prepared for them j and in Manfions of Glory enjoy the moft glorious Society, and behold the Glory of God himfelf, feeing him not only in his Works of Creation and Providence, but as He is i and ^\?\\ enjoy this unfpeakable Blifs and Felicity, without the leail: Chance of ever looiing it. And what can ftrike Men, if the greated Security of avoiding the utmoft Mifcry, and of enjoying the greatefl Glory, Dignity , Power , Dominion and BHfs for ever, fliall not ? And yet none can fay, that the Light of Nature could furniili us with this Motive, or that the Light of Revelation does not. And what is there, perhaps, but fome one of all thefe things, (which jointly make up the Motive of Revelation) and that in a poor, low Degree, and of uncertain and fliort Continuance, that engages us in any of the unwearied Purfuits of our whole Lives ? This is fufficient to fhew^ us, hov/ powerful all thefe Confideratioiis miifl be when joyn'd together ^ and of GOD to Mankind. 97 and how worthy therefore they are of a di- vine Difcovery ; and confequently that as Re- velation contains a ftronger and more power- ful Motive to Virtue, than we could have dif- cover'd by the Light of Nature, it is wifely calculated to produce more Virtue among Mankind. This it has a Tendency to do in all Cafes ^ but has a very fuperior Tendency to do it in fome : As for Inftance, in the Cafe of powerful and fudden Temptation ,- and par- ticularly in that, where we are reduced to the NecelTity of lofing our Life immediately, or of facrifieing our Virtue to fave it. Corollary X. If it be farther alledg'd. That Anions, which for the Matter of them are virtuous, yet when perform'd for the fake of extrinfical or pofitive Rewards, fuch as Revelation is here fuppofed to propofe to us, (or in other Words, Rewards that don't flow from the Nature of Things) ceafe to be virtuous, (which is what a late noble, learned and polite Au- thor has very much infifted on,) I anfwer; That indeed to be above all Reward or Hap- pinefs, but that which necelTarily refults from the Nature of Things, is the higheft Perfedion • but this can belong to no Being, but the unori- ginated Father of all Things j who being in- capable of any Addition to his Happinefs, can, O when ^% An EflayIX. 105 And, I. As to the Expreflion, that God hleljed Abraham ,• and in relation to this Ex- preflion, I dc/ire it may be obferved ,• I. That God blefled J dam and E've^ and when God gives a Blefling, we may be fure the Grant operates and conveys fomething that is coniiderable ; otherwife the Grant would be trifling or illufory. We find by Mofes's Hiftory, that what God blefs'd our firft Parents with, was Fniitftilnefs^ Gen. i. 28. dominion over all the other Creatures, ibid. Foody v. 29. A f leaf ant and fruitful Garden^ Chap, ii. 8 15. with the Means oi Immortality^ viz. the Tree of Life, v. 9. and with a Co'vering which was moft probably a Glory: For which I think feveral good Arguments may be offer'd, though this is not the Place for them. The Texts in the New Teftament where this Glory that Adam was cloathed in feem to be referr'd to, are JR.//W, viii. 3. I Gr. XV. 42 — -46. ^Philip, iii. 21. 2 Cor. V. 2^ 3, 4. 'KomiSviU 23. All I fhall farther fay here is^ that they were at firfi na- iled, and were not afhamed, v. 25. But when they were ftripp'd of their Glory, they were afraid {not aflmmed) hecaiife they were naked. Chap. iii. 10. as well knowing, that the Garment which they had loft was a Gar- ment of Dignity, a Badge of all the Bleflings tliey had from God ^ and they might well there- fore be afraid, when they had loft it, that they fhouid be depriv'd of all thofe Biellings, upon P hear- io6 ATT E N^ I X. hearing God's Voice in the Garden, in the very fame Manner in which they had received them. Accordingly on their Difobedience a Curfe was pronounced on them, inftead of the Blef- fing. The Curfe on E've feems to be a great Degree of Unfruitfulnefs. / will greatly wnltiply thy Sorrow^ and thy Conceptimi and Sorrow in bringing forth Children, ^. i6. in Oppofition to the original Blefling ^ "Bejniit- fill and multiply^ and replenifh the Earthy Chap. i. 28. The Curfe pronounced on Adam was Care, Toil and Sorrow, all the Days of his Life, by reafon of the Curfe of the Ground : And that he fhould return to the Duft out of which he was taken, Chap, iii. 17, 18, ip. 2. That there was ftill a further Curfe pro- nounc'd and infli(5i:ed on the Ground, that Cain fliould till, after he had flain his Bro- ther, Gen. iv. 12. From whence he {Cain) feems to have left oflE tilling the Ground, and to have betaken himfelf to other Arts j fuch as were ncceffary to build a City, c. 17. And his Defcendants feem likewife to have quitted the Tillage of the Ground after his Example, and to have turn'd Herdfmen, c 20. Mulici- ans, 'V, 21. and Artificers in Brafs and Iron, c. 22. &c. which alfo agrees with the Hiftory of Sanchionathan^ as well as of Mofes, This further Curfe on the Tillage of the QroiUid pronounced on Cain^ and that proba- bly; ATTEN'DIX. 107 bly followed his Defcendants, feems to have been a Mark of their being the avowed Fami- ly of the Devil, and was agreeable to other Curfes that always followed that Family in future Ages. 3 . That it is probable, that Setb's Defcen- dants did ftill Till the Ground, and had a Produce from it, though with great Labour and Toil j but it was reveal'd to Lamecb about fix Hundred Years before the Flood, that in Noah's Time they fhould receive fome Comfort or BlelTmg concerning the Work and Toil of their Hands, becaufe of the [original] Curfe which the Lord had pro- nounced on the Ground, Gen, v. 29. ciz. af- ter the Fall : See SherlocUs more fare Word of Trophecy. 4. That after the Flood God took off a great Part of the original Curfe, blelTing Noah and his Sons in many Inftances, as he did Adam and E-ve at their Creation. God bids them he fruitful and multiply^ and repk- nijlo the 'Earthy Gen. ix. i. and thereby pro- bably took off part of the great Sorrow in bearing and in bringing forth Children, that might be the Occafion of lefs Fruitfulnefs be- fore. We find that Noah had but three Sons when he was fix Hundred Years old. Gen, vii 7. and he is the only Antediluvian whofe Defcendants are all enumerated. But we find that though the Age of Man was iliortned to five Hundred Years immediately afcer the P 2 Floodj io8 ATTEN3)IX. Flood, yet Ham had four Sons, Gen. x. 6, Stem five, 'V, 12, and Japheth feven, c 2, It lliould feem therefore that in Fact, thofe who lived after the Flood were more fruitful than thofe who lived before it. But God does not flop here, but alfo takes off the Curfe from the Ground, or its Sterility, Chap. viii. 21./ will not for the Future mrfe the Qroimdfor Mans fake. So the Hebrew Word ihould be rendered, as it is, v, 22. and fo the Septuagint has render'd it. He likewife promifes favourable Seafons, c'. 22. Mofes accordingly obferves, that after the Flood^ iSloah began to be an Husbandman^ Gen. ix. 20. Not barely a Tiller of the Ground for meer Neceiraries i (that Noah's Ance- ftors had been all along ) but a Planter of a .Vineyard, for the Superfluities of Life : As expensing greater Fertility from the Removal of the Curfe, and the Grant of a Bleffmg. And Mofes further acquaints us, that Things anfwered his Expedation : And that his Vin- tage yielded him but too generous a Juice, unlefs he had made a better ufe of it, e^. 21. Zjaftly^ God reftores ISloah and his Sons to a greater Dominion over the Bcafts of the Earth, the Fowls of the Air, and the Fiflies of the Sea, than they had before, or probably fince the Fall. Perhaps the making the Beafts of the Field more tradable, was one way, by which God removed the Curfe of the Groundj and added to its Fruitfulnefs, as well as A9 T END I X. 109 ^'s to the Food of Mankind, In every In- ftance of God's Blefling any one, we muft, as has been obferved already , fuppofe fome Curfe removed, and fome Favour granted ; and in the Cafe of God's Bleirmg Noab and his Sons, we fee the Curfe remov'd in part, or in whole (as far forth as it feems to have beea God's Defign to remove it, till there fhall be no more Curfe) that had been pronounced oa Mankind at the Fall j except the laft part of it, 'viz. That T)uft thou art^ and to Tiiift thou JJjah return. When God bleffes Jhraham then. Gen, xii. 2. xxii. 1 7. It mufl-, as in the Cafe of our firft Parents, and in the Cafe of iVi?^Z?, denote the Removing fome part of the original Curfe, and reftoring the original Bleifing in part or in whole i or giving an equal BlefUng, if not a greater, than the firft. What lefs can be im- ported by the Phrafe ufed. Gen, xxii. 17. one of the Places I juft quoted. In ^lejfmg I will hiefs thee 1 Efpecially as it is introduced on fo great an Occaiion, as the Offering up the Heir of the Promife, and as it is conhrmed by an Oath. Or what lefs can be imported, when in him (or in Blefling him) God de- clares, that he bleffed all the Families or Na- tions of the Earthy i. e. that fliould imitate him in his Faith and Obedience ? The Blef- fing that arofe from taking off the other Parts of the Curfe, the reft of the Families of the Barth, as the Defcendants of Noah^ (to whom thofc no AT T E ATX) IX thofe BielTings were granted) partook in al- ready. Now, lince the other Parts of the Curfe had been removed in the Bleffing to Noah and his Sons, what can this moft fo- lemn Bleflfing of Jhraham^ and in him of all the Nations of the Earth, (in the Language of thofe early Times, when the Blelling and Curfe on our firft Parents was fo deeply imprefs'd on their Minds, and fo thorough- ly underftood,) carry lefs in it, than reftoring Jbraham exprefly to Immortality (not indeed without tailing Death, but) from or after Death -, the great and moft bitter Part of the original Curfe, which had not yet been taken away ^ fo that this ExprefTion plainly implies Jdoption to eternal Life, in the Language of thefe Times. II. I am to fhew,That God's adopting Jbra- ham to the Inheritance of eternal Life is in- cluded in the other Expreflion, of the Lord's being THE GOD ^/Abraham. And here the Adoption is not implied but exprelTed. And in order to make that out, I w^ould pre-, mife. That Sir Ifaac Newton has fully proved, ¥rinc. p. 48 2. that the Term God is a relative Term ; and a Term of Relation that is found- ed in 'Dominion. That being fuppofed, the Term God muft iignify the Dominion and Au- Ihority of a Father, ofaMafter, or of a King. ""^ ~ " ^ ' For AT 'P E N D'l X. lit For all Sorts of Dominion and Authority may be reduc'd to one of thefe. Now God indeed may figuratively have been always faid to be the Mafter of Man- kind, and they may be faid to be his Ser- vants,- in as much as in many Things God refembles a Mafter, and Mankind his Ser- vants 'y and he is therefore often mentioned as fuch in Scripture, though never till after the Death o{ Abraham : Yet God is not properly and ftri«3:ly ever confider'd as a Mafter, in any part of Scripture, becaufe he has never entered into Covenant with Mankind, under the Noti- on of a Mafter with his Servants. In like manner, God may always figura- tively have been faid to have had a Kingdom ruling over all i in as much as there are many Rcfemblances between God's Power over all Things, and the Power a King has over his Subjeds. But God is never fo much as men- tioned as a King, even incidentally, in Scrip- ture, till about the Time that he by Covenant at Moimt Sinai became the K-ing of the If^ raelites. Nor had he a People till then. And afterwards indeed, he alfo by Covenant be- came the fupreme King of all Cbriftians^ v/he- ther j€x;:s or Gentiles, But God had Children, or a Family, before he had a Kingdom and a People j even from the firft Man and Woman. And therefore whenever the Term God occurs in Scripture, before either of the Periods, in which the fu- 2 prcme iia AT'TENTflX. preme Being oecame by Covenant the King of the Ifraelites^ and of the Chriftians^ in a %iKk and proper Senfe ^ the Term Qod muft import the other Relation of Power and Au- thority, mz, that of a Father ; agreeably to the Authority that then prevailed in the World, which was Family or Patriarchal ,• and that God muft, from the very Nature of Things, have been ever con/idered as a Fa- ther, even in the patriarchal Period, before lie was a King over a People^ will fully ap- pear from what follows, 1. That Jdam was created an earthly and animal Son of God i having no other Fa- ther but God i being made like him in his moral Perfections ^ and veftcd with Domini- on, the Blifs of Parad ife. Glory and Immor- tality ; as an Inheritance fuited to the high Relation he bore to God. All which carries in it the whole Notion of a Father, in the mod: ftridj proper, and precife Senfe of the ,Word. 2. That J dam by his Difobedience /uft the moral Image or Likenefs of God ; and was thereupon diverted of the Inheritance of a Son of God ,• driven out of Paradife, kept from Returning to it, made fubjed to Toil^ Care, Vexation, Difeafes and Deaths and inftead of the Glory which he had in Inno- cence, a Badge of his Soniliip to God, God made him Coats of the Skins of Beafts, as a Cloathing that might ferve to fliew him, to what AT P E N 7) I X. 113 what a low State he had reduced liimfclf, by fiifi-ering his Appetites and Pafiions to get the better of his Reafon. From whence this Mo- ral was plainly held forth, That he being in Honour^ and zz^ithottt TJnderflanding^ was become like the 'Bcafls that perijij. EfTay, p. 10. God alfo gave him a plain Intimation, that if he would continue to obey the Serpent, he muft fliare in his peculiar Curfe, EjXa)\ p. 14, 15. 3. That Adam forfeited this Inheritance, not only for himfelf, but for his Pofterity ; begetting Men not in the Image or I>ikenefs of God i Heirs of Dominion, Biifs, Glory and Immortality,- but in his own Likenefs^ after his Image^ Sons of Men^ and Heirs of his Curfe : Namely, Toil, Care, Vexation, Dif- eafes and Death. JEf[a)\ p. 10, 11. 4. That Cain being born an Heir of the Curfe, and at laft not barely continuing a Son of Man, but becoming the Seed of the Ser- pent, imitating and obeying him (in being a Liar and a Murthcrer, as he was) notwith- ftanding God's gracious Admonition and Cau- tion to the contrary, became the Head and Founder of the avowed Family of the Devil in the World ^ and was accordingly marked as fuch by peculiar Curfes, that feem to have foUovv'd him and his Pofterity. E(]ay^ p«H) ' 5* 5. That notwithftanding this, whoever from the Sons of Men, and Heirs of Death, became like unto God, refembling hijtji in Pu- Q. rity. 114 ATTEN'DIX, rity, Juflicc and Mercy, might form Inferen- ces and Hopes, that he might become a Son or a Child of God, through Adoption to a fuitable Inheritance ; though perhaps without knowing what that Inheritance iliould be. EjpfJ:, p. 1 6. A Child of this Character God gave to our hrft Parents in Set/j. inftead of right eons Ahtl^ whom Cain ilew\ He and his Delcendants were the avowed Family of God in the World, being called hy his Kame^ Gen.iv. 26. And being expreily ftiled the Chil- dren or Sons of God ^ Gen.vi. i . Effay^ p. 1 5 , 1 6. 6, To give the Sons of God a more aflured and lively Notion of what their Inheritance by Adoption was , God tranilated Unoch -, thereby alluring good Men, that they fliould enjoy a future State of Happincfs in Soul and Body. For Unoch w^as tranilated after being the iirft that prophefy'd, and after he had all along walked with God, as Adam had done in Innocence, who had conversed with the Shechinah in the Garden, till Sin and Guilt made him afraid of him, depart from him, and hide himfclf. Good Men of that Age muft have concluded by the Rules of Propor- tion, that though Enoch\ eminent and diftin- guiili'd Piety was rewarded with Immortality by Tranllation ,• yet that a lower Degree of Piety than his, if iincere, v/ouid meet with Immortality as its Reward, in fome Way, Cind at ibmc 'I'ime or another. Effaj'y p. 17. y. l'lv;re could not be a Proof of a more wic- A T T E NT> I X. 115 wicked Difpofition , than for any of the Sons of God to marry with the daughters of Men, i. e. the Daughters of the Family of the Devil i not only as thefe Marriages were againft God's Order, and the Interpolition of his Pro- vidence, but as it was exprelling the utmoft Contempt of the Inlieritance of God's Family ,• and as it was at the fame Time a cafting off all Fear of the peculiar Curfe, that was the Inhe- ritance of the Family of the Devil; and there- fore, thofeof the Family of God, who made fuch Intermarriages, muft thereby have become the Family of the Devil. Effay^ p. 18. 8. Noah-, being the only righteous Per- fon, or the only Pcrfon zioho walked with Gcd^ and abftained from this impious Mixture, was the only Perfon treated as a Son of God^ by the peculiar Protcdion God vouchfafed him and his Family from the total DeftruClion, which he fent on the avowed Family of the Devil. Bffaj^ p. 18, 19. 9. Noah intimates, that the Lord wotdd he the God of Shem, Gen. ix. 26, Or the Father of Shem^ in a Way, in which he would net (at leaft immediately) be the Fa- ther oijapbeth^ the elder Brother, or of Ca^ uaanj the Son of Ham. All which is pro- phetically faid, not of the Perfons of Shem^ Japheth or Canaan ; but of their Defcen- dants. Effay^ p. 20. 10. Accordingly the Defcendants of Ca^ iiaan had great and peculiar Curfes attending Q 2 them. ii6 AT T E N T> I X. them, in the Difpcrfion of ^ahel^ the Deflru- <5tion of the Cities of the Plain, the Extir- pation of the Seven Nations, cJ'r. Effay^ p. 21. 11. On the other Hand, God exprelly Z'/f/i'W Abraham, a Defcendant of ^Z7^w, (and the only one who had walk'd before God, and kept himfelf free from Idolatry) and he- came HIS GOD; Which God had never exprelly promised to be to any one before, fince the Fall. Effay^ p. 23, 24. 12. Hence it is, that God, and Father, or Terms that imply them, are Terms recipro- cally us'd in the Old Teftament i and join'd together in the New^ Gen. iv. 25. vi. 2 . Tfal. Ixxxix. 25. Hofea i. 9, 10. John xx. 17. 2 Cor. vi. i5, 18. Rei', xxi. 7. So that to be a God, is in the Language of Scripture, to be a Father j at leaft in the patriarchal Periods And for God to be a Father to one, who is not created, or born, or begotten a Son of God, is to be a Father by Adoption j and to be a Father by Adoption, is to give an Inheri- tance in Title, if not in Poflcllion ^ and the Inheritance that God gives as a Father, is Dominion, Blifs, Glory and Immortality. EJfay^ p. 1 5. Though it muft be own'd, that after the Lord became the King of the yezjvs by Covenant, and afterwards the fu- preme King of Chrifiians^ whether Jews or Gentiles^ God may iignify King as well as Father ; and which of thefe that Term fignities, muft be determined by the Context. See TfaL v. 2. AT T E NT) I X. 117 V. 2. Ixviii. 24. cxlv. I. yobnxK, ij, 2 Cor, vi. i6y 18. Rec, xxi. 3. compared with c. 7. 13. Hence it is, that Chrift proves the Re- fiirredion of good Men (for about them is the Queftion) to the Saddticees^ from Mofes calling the Lord the God ^/Abraham, Ltike xx. 37. I lliall only quote this PafTage hiftorically, or as a Proof of what the JewiJJj Notions were about this Matter, but not as holy Writ : fmce I am here treating with the Deifts, who don't allow that there is any fuch Thing. In order to fee the full Force of our Saviour s Ar- gument, it muft be obferv'd, (i,) That the Qiieftion the Saddnceesvao- ved is about the Refurredion of the Man, and not about the Exiftence of the Soul in a fepa- rate State • not only becaufe the Saddttcees are here defcribed as denying the KefarreUion^ (v. 27.) but becaufe the Argument they ufe to fupport their Opinion, relates to the Man, and not to the fcparate State of the Soul. It being an Argument drawn from Marriage, -J, 28 34- (2.) That the Queftion moved by the Sad^ ducees is not about the Refurreclion ot good and bad Men, but of good Men only. For the Argument they bring againft a Pvefur- redion fuppofes a State of Happincfs and Enjoyment at the Refurredtion, which can only belong to the Ju(l. For their Argument is^ that there can be no Refurredion of good Men, becaufe feven Brethren, who had one Wo- ii8 ATTEN'DIX. Woman to Wife faccellively in this Life , could not all of them poflibly have her to Wife together after the Refurredion. (3.) That our Saviour's Argument to prove the Refurre(5Vion5 c. 37. does not lie in thefe Words, / J M the God of Abraham, be- caufe they arc not lb quoted here. But Mofes CJLLErH THE LORT> THE GOI) OF AJ^RAHA jM. And becaufe though our Tranflators have render- ed Mdttb, ^x\\. 32. /am theQod^ &c. yet that AVord is not in the Original : But only \yyjo 0£: OF ABRAHAM: That is, the Father oi Jhrabamy viz. by Adopti- on : And that the Adoption of God is Im- mortality, and what accompanies Immortali- ty. For Chnlt had faid jud before, that the Children or Sons of God are Children or Sons of the Kcfnri eUion, And he adds, God is net the God [ or the Father ] oj the 'Dead [i. e. of good Men that are Dead for c\'er, which was what the Saddiicees meant by Dead] hit of the Li-fing [i. c. of fuch good Men as Haould live again] which was the Point the Saddiicees deny'd. For God can't give Immortality, (jc. as an Inheritance, either in Title or PoireiHon, to fuch as are ir- recoverably dead j but to fuch only as fli?ll be living. And without giving that Inheri- tance A T T E N D I X. 119 tance in Title or Poflelllon, he can't be a Fa- ther by Adoption. And Chrifl: immediately adds, .y//, that is, all good Men, fiich a^ Jbrahmn^ &c. li'-je [or lliall live] '::oith him (as the Words may be rendered) ciz in the other World. If it had not been iinderflocd among the JeWs^ that God and Father were the fame Thing ; and that being a God of any one, implied Adoption, or the Inheri- tance of Immortality, to every one that was not a Son by Creation, Birth or Generation, the Saddncees would never have been iilcnc'd by this Argument. But it h plain this was a Notion received among the Jezi's^ iince the Saddncees make no manner of Reply. And that it w^as fo , farther appears from the Jezz'iJJj V/ritings both before Chrift and fince. In the Book of irifdoin^ ch. ii. 16, 7.0. it is faid, He pronounced the latter Jind of the J lift bleffedj and hcafts that he has God for his Father, Let iis cut hir,i off 'with a JJjameful Death. ¥or if the juft Man be the Son of God^ he will receive him. Jnd V. 22,23. ihey (pake becaiij'e they knew not the Ihfteries of God ; nor hoped for the Re- ward (f Holinefs, nor difcerncd the Recom- pence of the blamelefs Souls, For God made Man for Ficorr-uption^ and to be an Image of his own Immortality. And ch. iii. i, 4, 7. Ihe Soids of the Righteous are in the Hands of God^ and their Hope is full of Immortality, in the 'Bay of their Vifitation they fialljlniie. And lao ATTEN'DIX. And cb.v, i, 4, 5. Then fljall the Right g- ous ft and with jj^r cat 'Boldriefs before the Face of them that affliUed them^ and they Jhall fay\ we Fools counted his Life Madnefs^ and his End to he without Honour^ hut now is he mmhered among the Sons of God^ and his ^Portion is with the Saints, The feven .Sons mentioned in Maccabees are ftill called Chil- dren of the Stock A. ed and Idolatrous, as well as a ftrange Land j making him, moreover, fubmit to the pain- ful Rite of Circumciiion, put away Hagar and his Son Ijhmael^ and at laft be ready to offer up his only legitimate Son Ifaac ^ the Heir of the Promife. This is fufficiently underftood. However, fuch a Faith as this was not, ftriaiy fpeaking, Righteoufnefs (which is an [ entire, perfed and conftant Conformity to the original Law of the great Father of our firft Parents ;) but it was what God now allured Jbraham^ J dams Defcendant by Setb and Shsm^ that hs mercifully counted^ or reckoned for Righteoufnefs : Declaring this now as the gracious, and abated or fecondary Rule of his Family here below, I'hat he, who from a Belief of his Truth and Power, would re- gulate the Main of his Conduct, according to the Rule he had given him, fliould be count- ed Righteous j though he might, through the $uddennefs of feme great Surprize, and the Strength of his Appetites or Palnons, fome- times deviate from it,- as Jbra/ja?n in fome Inilances dkL Now we are fure, that the Reckoning or Judgment of God is juft. For the Righteoufnefs of a Man is a Conformity of the Temper and A6iions of a Man to fome ;Pvule that he is under. And wheji the Judge, who has a competent Jurifdiction, pronounces that a Man has aded up to that Rule^ that Man may then be properly H^id to be Righte- ous,- AT) T> E N T> A. 123 ous ; though the Rule by which he is judg'd, be a Rule of lit and proper Grace, Relaxa- tion, and Favour, (from a Weaknefs and In- ability to obfervc the hrft and original Rule) and not that tiril: flrict and original Rule it felf. Now it fecms to have been the original Connexion and Conftitution of Things, fet- tled and framed by the w^ife Contriver and Difpofer of all Things ; that Life (that is, Exiltence and Enjoyment or Happinefs) fhould be the Confequence of Righteoafnefs ; or of a Conform.ity to the Law or Rule Man was under : And that Death (that is a Cefla- tion of Exiftence and Enjoyment or Happi- nefs) fliould be the Confequence of Unrigh- teoufnefs. Thus, at lead, it appears plainly, that in Fa*ft it has been in all God's Difpenfations. The Tree of Life, which was in the midft of the Garden of £^d'//, was a full Declaration, that if Adam W'as obedient or righteous, he fhould live. And he was exprefly threaten'd, that if he was difobedient or unrighteous, he fliould die. That Threatning farther impli- ed, and very (Irongly, that if he was not difobedient or unrighteous, he Ihould not die, that is, that he fliould live. By the Law of Mofes^ E't'cry one was ciir^ fiid^ that c utinued nu in all Thivgs 'written in the Loz2) to do them^ Deut. xxviii. 26. Gal. lii. 10. Jnd the Soid that finned was R 2 to iH A ^ 1) E N 7) A. to dicy Ezek. xviii. 4. See alfo i Scim» xii. 13.^ On the contrary, Obedience to the Law of Mofes was the Right eotifnefs of the Children of Ifraelj Deut. vi. 25. The Law farther fays cxprefly, That he that follow d what was altogether juft flmdd Vwe^ Deut. xvi. 20. XXX. 6, And as God firft , the Prophet afterward fays, of all God's Statutes and Judgments, that if a Man do them^ he Jloall the in them^ Lev. xviii. 5. Ezek. xx. 11, 1^5 21. See T,iikc x. 25, 28. Rom. x. 5. See Ejfay, p. 3 5. Thus It \s plain Things have flood by the Law of Mofes and of Innocence. But this original Connexion or Conftitution fcems more over founded in the natural and neceflary Order of Things, which fccms to be this j 1 hat if a reafonable Being, which, as he is capable of a Rule, mud: be always under one, ads up to that Rule, and thereby anfvvers the End of his Being, he Hiould go on to be, and en- joy : As on the other Hand, when it is plain, that he would not ad up to that Rule, and anfvver the End of his Being, he fhould ceafe to be. Rightcoufnefs ha^ a natural Tendency to Life and Happincf^, and would produce it, were it not for external Caufes, that hinder it : And Unrightcoufnefs has a natural Ten- dency to Death, either by being contrary to our Health, to Peace with our Neighbours, and (both from that Conlideration, and im- mediately) to the Peace of our own Minds. Agree- AD D E N "D A. 115 Agreeably hereto the Scripture repre- fents Things j not only in the Law of MofeSj when it tells us, that Kighteottfnefs is Qiir Life ; That is, fo naturally, fo clofely, fo infeparably conneded with Life, as that it may be faid to be Life it felf ,• but in the Law of Chrifl-, when it alfo tells us, that The Wages of Sin is T)eath^ whilft the Gift of God is eternal Lije^ Rom. vi. 23. It farther adds, that He that hepeth the Command- rnents of God hath a RIG HT to the Tree of Life ^ Rev. xxii. 14. That He that fow^ eth to his Flefi floall of the FleJJj reap Corrupt tion^ and he that foweth to the Spirit^ jJoall of the Spirit reap Life eierlafting ,• as the natural Produd:ion of fowing to the one, or to the other, Gal vi. 8. And laftly, it af- furesus, to this purpofe, by a Similitude from animal Productions, as it did in the laft Place by- a Similitude taken from the encreafe of Vegetables, That Ltift iL'hen it is conceiced^ hringeth forth Sin^ and Sin when it is finiJJjed hringeth forth Ueath^ James i. 15. All this is fo exadly true, and in fo exad a Proportion, that Chrift the Righteous, who was not only perfcdlly Righteous, by the original I>aw, that Man was ever under ; but by a fjperior and extraordinary Law of Righte- oufnefs, (which from his extraordinary love of Righteoufnefs, and his extraordinary ha- tred of Iniquity, he voluntarily put himfclf under , by virtue of which alone , he who was ii6 AT) "D E N "D A. was perfedly righteous became fubjedt to Death) had not only Life (in a few Hours after Death, without feeing Corruption) for himfelf, but in himfelf ^ that is, a Power to give it to all that fhall be for the Main con- formM to him in the lower Rule of Righte- oufnefs, he was under j as much, as all die, who are conform'd to Adam in Sin and Vn- righteoufuefs ^ or in a Deviation from that lower Rule of Righteoufnefs. So that as Death actually enter'd the AVorld by ^^^^'s^.^^A Sin, Life enters by Chrift, op. his Obedience^' " as the firft Fruits of them that fleep. See Kom.y* T2 2 1. In line, as thus we fee, that Righteoufnefs and Life are in fad infeparably conned:ed,in the three great Difpenfations of God to Mankind, in the Reafon of Things, and in feveral plain Aflertions of Scripture, and in an exad Pro- portion to that Degree of Righteoufnefs the righteous Perfon had ; it foliovvS, that when God dechircd to J bra bam, that he counted his Faith for Rightecufnefs, God declared, that Abraham flioiild inherit Life. But in- deed, there is this difference between inherit- ing Life by virtue of the if rid original Rule, and inheriting it by virtue of the fecondary and equi- table Rule J that he that obfervcs the original and ftrid Rule of Righteoufnefs pcrfedly and conftantly, fliall enjoy Life without tafling Death and Corruption, as a Debt : Whereas, he that only conforms to the fecondary and equi- AT) T> E N "D A. 127 equitable Rule of Righteoufnefs, yet yielding fometimes to the Law of Unrighteoufnefs, he fhall indeed tafte of Death and Corruption for foms Time, but fhall flill indefeafibly inherit Life, after being recovered from Death and Corruption, (though ilill by a well propor- tioned Grace and Favour) and be fav'd from the fecond Death, or from Wrath to come. To which purpofe fee Rom. iv. 2 '9. Having added a Note, by way of Appen- dix, to the Difpenfation of Ahraham^ I will here likewife fubjoin my Thoughts, by whom the moft High adminilter'd his earth- ly Kingdom. They fhould have come into the Bodyof tha lE^a}\ page 31. (after the Words, ^v:od. xxiv. 3, 12.) in the Words following. But though God was the King of this Peo- ple, yet he does not feem to have admini* fter'd the Kingdom immediately himfelfj but by the Word: The moft High ading in this, as in all other Inftances, not immedi- ately, but mediately, either by the Word, or by the Spirit, in all his different Operati- ons, in the natural and moral World. The Word in this Difpenfation is cali'd Jehovah^ the fame, who created the Heaiens and the Earthy (who is faid co have created them, S Gen. ii8 AD D EN'D A. Gen. I and ii. 2, j.) Gen. ii. 4. ?Y^/. xxxiiL d, 9. ZT^^. i. 2. but as the Minifter of the Father, or of Elohim j who converfed with our firft Parents, Gen. ii. 16. iii. 9, 22. who APPEAR'D to Noah^ {G^n. vi. 1 5. vii. I, 16. viii. 15. IX. 1 — —18.) to Abraham^ (Gen. xvii. 1,2. and xviii. i, 2, j^.) to Ja- cohy ("Gen. xxviii. ij, 16. xxxii. ^o. xxxv. 9, 15.; and to ilii^/^j- at the Bufh, {Exod. iii, 6, 7, 1 4.) Saying, 1 am the God of Abra- ham, 6c, I am that I am \ or, / will he, that I will he ', or, who will give Being and Accomplilhment to his Covenant and Pro- mifes. See Ainfworth in loc. Who went before the Children of Ifrael in a Pillar of Cloud and a Pillar of Fire, Exod. xii. 21. Who came down on Mount Sinaiy Exod. xix. 18. and gave the Law to the Children of Ifrael., Exod, xx. 2. AUs vii. 58. Heh, xii. 25, 26. who faid at firll he would fend an Jngel before them^ in whom he would put his Name., Exod. xxiii. 20, 23. And af- terwards faid, he would DWELL among the Children of Ifrael^ and be their God, "Exod. xxix. 4(5. But on the Idolatry of the golden Calf, faid, he would not go up him- felf, Exod, xxxii. 34, ^5. xxxiii. 2 — 12* And yet at lafi: faid, he would go up^ on Mofes\ Iniercedion ; Exod, xxx. 12, 17. and is then cali'd his [or Jeho'vah's] Tre" fence ^ or the Angel of his Tre fence:, Ifai ixiii. 9. and afterwards, The Jngel of the Co- A T> "D E N T> A. la^ Coc^enant^ Msilnl. i. compared with M(^tt, xi. 10. McV'k i. 2. where Jefus applies this to himfelf. The Jngel of the Lord-, or of Jcho'vah^ Zech. xii. 8. 2)^//^ xxxiii. 13, 16. and fometimes only the Angel ^ as Gen, xlviiic 16. compar'd with Gen. xxviii. ij, 20—22. .^^jvii. 35, 38. By the Prefence of this Angel it was, that this People becanpie J'ffe'^Z^'s People, jEcW^. xxxiif. I J. Kumh, xi. 29. and was diftinguifhed from all other Nations, jE.W. xxxiii. \6. For other Nations had Angels of God prefiding over them, as is not only intimated in T)aniel^ Chap. x. I J, 20. but by Mofes, T)etit. xxxii. 8, 9., when he fays, That when God divided to the Nations their Inheritancey when he fepar ci- ted the Sons ^y Adam ; he fet the bounds of the Teople according to the Number of the Angels^ (for fo is the true Reading, as ap- pears by the LXX, and by what follows,) ^The Lord [or Jehovah's] Tortion was his 'People^ and Jacob was the Lot of his Inheri- tance, And ^'er. 1 2. 27?^ Lord [or Jeho- vah] alone did lead him^ and there was no, firange God with him. So that I take Jeho- E N D A. fage 66'j^ 668. Edit, the Fourth. That this Angel, Minifter or MeiTenger, fliould be the Word, feems but reafonable from fo high a Prerogative, as being thus call'd by the Name of Jeho^jah^ and ading in his Name and Stead. What follows would have been in a Note on this Paragraph, if the Notes had been compleat. I think we muft all agree, with Jtiftin Martyr^ Iren^etis^ Terttdlimi^ and moft of the Fathers, that God, the Father of all Things, being a Spirit, or a Being intirely Incorporeal or Immaterial, muft in his own Nature be Invifible to all bodily Eyes of what Kind or Rank foever ; and that as he is Omniprefent, and fills all imaginable Space, and is He, in whom all the Works of his Hands mcje and haz-e their Beings He can't, ftridly and philofophically fpeaking, come^ fiay or go^ afcend or defcend^ appear or difappear* When therefore any of thefe Things are predicated of the moft High, they can only fignify, that feme Being or Beings more nearly allied to Him than we are, come, ftay, or go, (j-c. particularly fome Minifter or Meftenger, Minifters or Meilengersof his, v/ho are confidered either 2 as A^ D E NT) A. i^i as his Retinue, or as the Revealers or Exe- cutioners of his Will and Pleafure. Far- ther, is it at ail agreeable to the Rules of Analogy and Proportion, to fuppofe, that the firll Caufe and Father of all Things, who created all Things, and upholds all Things by the W O R D, who quickens all Things , and qualifies and enlightens his Prophets, and even his own Son by the SPIRIT, by whom He alfo begat Hini in the Womb of the bleffed Virgin, Ihould Himfelf have ever fpoke immediately to Mankind ? To this purpofe are thofe Scrip- tures that ftile him the invifible God, 'wbom no Ma7i hath feen cr can fee^ John i. 18. See Colof/i. 15. I Tim, i. 17. vi. 15, 16. Heb.xi. I think then, if the Scriptures were filent, and did not contradid what I am going to propofe (as an Hypothefis that feems to me very probable) it might be left to any one to judge, which of the two Suppofitions was moft likely ; either the late one, that God fhould have at firft made, and always up- held the World by one Being ; and made Appearances, and the great Revelations or MefTages from himfelf 10 Mankind by ano- ther Being ; though ftiling himfelf Jehcvah^ and of whofe Reward for this righteous Ma- nagement we have no Account ; and then fend the laft MefFage to Mankind by that Being in Fielh, by whom he at firft made, and 131 AJ) T> E NT) A. and all along upheld the World: Or this, which for the Matter of it is the antient one, C'iz. that God (hould make all his Appearan- ces, and great Revelations by the Word, by whom he at firft made, and all along up- held the World, conducing all Things^ and particularly the Affairs of iht Ifr a elites and their Anceftors, ( among whom the great Scene of moral Providence layj by him, as his chief Minifter, MeiTenger or Angel, al- ways ading in his Name and Stead ,• till by his own extraordinary Lcz'e of Kighteoufnefsy and Hatred of Iniquity^ he had prepared and fitted Men and Things (particularly by his Management of the Je'wijh People; for the lafl: Dilpenfation; when in Reward of this his righteous Managment Iv fjLo^pi 0s3', and of His Condefcenfion in being made in the Likenefs of a Man [Iv hfj^A-^fj^oL^ dv^p'J)i7ru)V yzvzjuivoi;'] and (inftead of fpeaking with Thunders and Lightning, and the Sound of a Trumpet, from a Cloud of Glory) teaching Mankind fa- miliarly the Mind and Will of the Father ; and minidring to them in their NecefTities and In- firmities, and at laft fubmitting to Death, even the Death of the Crofs,for their good, He fhould be advanced to be Lord and Heir of ail Things, and confequently adminifter an univerfal Kingdom in his own Name, above all other Principalities, or all other, even the higheft, Angels, who had formerly, in the Conduct of other Nations , been, his Fel- A T> T> E N T> A, 155 Fellows : They now being probably advan- ced and rewarded for their righteous Con- duct in their refpecliv^e Provinces, as ibey trhnnpjjd in him^ as their exalted Head and Lord Let any one after ccoly making this Comparifon between the two Suppofitions, fee, whether he muft not think the latter the more probable ; and that not only from the bare Comparifon, but from this farther Con- fideration , that upon this laft Suppofition, God will appear not only to have aQ:ed ac- cording to Rules of the ftricleft Juftice, and moft exact and beautiful Proportion, and with an Unity in ail his Difpen fat ions, of Creation and Providence, and that both over the natural and moral World ; but likewife thereby {^i us the greateft Example, how we, by managing the Talents, that are-ac prefent given us, and particularly by all A£ts of Humility, Condefcenfion, and Self- denial, for the Good of others, may come to inherit the K.ngdom prepared for us, and to fit down at his right Hand-^ as he fat down at the Father s, St. Taid runs into Thoughts of this kmd, Heh. i. S, 9. Eph,iv, i— 13. Thil.'w. I 14. That the moft High fent his great MelTa- ges to the 7//Y7^//to, and their Anceftors, by the Word, was the Opinion of the Fathers. But that would not be of great Confequence, if, in all this, the Scriptures did not feem plainly to go along with us 5 confirming this 134 A "D T> E N T> A. this Notion, (mz. that the Angel who is call'd '^eho'vah^ was the Word) (i.) By its being manifeftly alluded to by the New Teftament Writers C^ohn i. i, 2, j, 4, 5, 9, 10 17. G^/. iv. 14. ThiLn.6. Heh,'u 8, 9. jR^e?. xxi. 2, J. compared with yf?/&^i.i4. JS:x:i7^. xxix. 42, 45, 44, 45, 46. £^a xxvi. 11,12. andG^//.vi. ij. xvii. 1,2. xviii.1,2, j^. xxviii. 1^5 16. xxxii. 30. xxxv. 9, ij. £:c^^. iii. 6, 7, 14. By all which Places it fhould feem, that he who APPEARED to the Anceftors of the Ifraelitcs-, who faid he would DWELL with the ijraelites , after the Covenant at Horeh^ and fet his Tabernacle among them , and would be THEIR GOD, and take them for H I S PEOPLE; was the fame with him, who DWELT, or tabernacled among the Jews^ when he took Flefh, that he fhould purify to him- felf a peculiar People ; and who will taber- nacle or DWELL with Men again, at his fecond Coming, when he will take all Men, both the JewiJJ) Nation, and all the Nations of the Earth, for his PEOPLE, and be T H E I R G O D. (2.) By its being like- wile fuppofed by them, when they quote Texts out of the Old Teftament relating to Jeho'vab^ and apply them to Chrifl^ as John xii. 4 , . quoted from i/^.vi. 1,^,5. Kom* X. »j. quoted from Joel li. 32. And, (5 J By its being, to my Apprehenfion, exprefly alTertcd both by the Writers of the Old Te- ftament^ AT> "D E N D A. 155 ftament, (T)eiit. xxvlii. 58. Tfil. \)^v\ii 17, 18. compir'd with Epb. iv. 7 -12. (For he tiHt aUended is the fame that defzended on Mount Sim/ as well as into the lower Tarts ot" the Earth, and I believe St. Tanfs Thought was occafion'd by that in the T/d/m) Jerem, xxiii. 6. Mich. v. 2.) and alio by the N^w Tcllamcnc Writers, yijZ'/^ i. II. and viii, 56 (Where our Saviour alTirts, that Jhrahiim faw his TJaj^ that is HLVl, (as appears by the Je^joi Reply, -ver, 57. and our Saviour's Rejoinder, ler. 58. and by the Seiife of the Word l^:iy in other Places, Job xviii. 20. Z////lv xvii. 22, 24, ^o. I Cor. iv. 3.; I CV;;\ x. 4, 9. compar'd witli Exod. xvi). 6. See alio Heh. i. 2. xii. 25, 26. Kef life not him that fpeaketh^ Sec. where ic is plain that it is the Voice of the fama Perfon that noz£ fpeahs from Heaven^ who formerly fpoke en Earthy viz. on Mount Siuai. It will be necelTary to fjieak particularly to this Text, becaufe it has been lately ap- ply'd to God tiie Father, by that moft iaga- ciou5, judicious, and^ learned Conimentaior * This Proof chat I have oEfer'd from fo'.nvvX. 56. with the Ttx:s which fupporc the Senfe that is lisre given to the Word D<:y, was mentiou'd to me by an ingenious ani learned Man, w h'j, on other Occadons, as well as this, has fu^yclted feveral Things which have been of ufe to me, when he has known my ThoL'-ghcs to be engag'd on parcicvilar Subjeils, T M^' 1^6 A "D D E N T> A. Mr. Teirce^ of whom the World was not worthy. But notwithftanding the Defe- rence due to fo great an Expofitor, I think it is plain, that this Text relates to Chrift, from the following Confiderations ; (i.) From the general Defign of this Epiitle, which is to prevent the Hebrew Believers from apoftatizing from Cluidianity, on Ac- count of the Perfecutions they fuffer'd. This runs through the whoie Epiftie, and there- fore is mod: likely to be the Conclufion of the whole Argument, which ends with this Chapter. The i pb Chapter confiiiing of Salutatio;~s and Exhortations to feveral Da- tie?, with which St, Vaul^ the Author of this Epiitle, after he has concluded the Ar- gument of every one of his Epililes, gene- rally doles them. There was no Occafion for St. ?diil to bid the Hebrews not refufe to hear God the Father, for they were not in Danger of apofratizing from Judaifm as well as from Chriifianily, but from Chrifsi- anity to Judaifm. (2,) From the immediate Context-, which either is the beginning of this Chapter, in thefe Words, Let lis run with Patience the [Chrijiiaul Race that is fet before us^ iook^ iii^ unto J ejus theTiireUor and the Rewarder ]^d^.yY,ylv ii)Ti?\.Q^ooTnv'^ of cur Faith : Or ver. 24. Jnd to J e fits the Mediator of the New Co'venaiit^ and to the "Blood of Sprinklings which fpeaketb better things than the Blood of AT>T)ENDA. 137 of Jhel Then follows, See that ye rcfitfe not him that Jpeaketh. Which foever of thefe Verfes are the Contexr, ('and indeed I think both arej it refers this Text to Chrift, and not to God the Father. (l-) The Argument of the Apoftle lies in this, that the Hebrews fhould hear the Voice ot the fame Perfon that before fpoke on Earth, but now fpeaks from Heaven 5 whofe Voice only then fhook the Earthy but now hath fliaken Hea-ven alfo. So that the Argument is drawn from the Place from whence he fpeaks, and the Effect of his Voice from that Place. Now the Force of the Argument from the Place, I think, can be only this. ^' See that ye refufe not him " that now fpeaketh, ciz. the Son ; for if *' they efcaped nor, who refufed to hear " Jeho'jah^ the V/ord, fpeaking on Earth, *^ when he fpake but as an Angel, Minifter, '^ or MelTenger of i:he Father, how much " more Ihall not we efcape, if we turn a- *^ way from him that fpeaketh from Hea- '* ceil " ; i. e from him now become the Son, or the Heir and Lord of all Things, feated on the Riaht Hand of God in the Hea- vens, and fpeaking and acting in his own Name and Authority ? From thence, f'agree- able to his Argument, chap. ii. cer, 2, g.) indeed, as he adds, his Voice formerly, when he fpake on Earth, and aded but only barely as an Angel, Minifter, and MelTen- T 2 ger 138 AT> T> END A. ger of the Father, fhook the Earth, ^jIz. Mount Siftai -, but now that he is the King of the Kingdom that cannot be fhaken, has Ihaken not only the Earth, or Earthly King- doms, but Heaven, or the Heavenly, or An- gehca! Powers. See Mr. Tetrce\ admirable Note on Eeh. xii. 26, 27, If this relates to the Father, there is no Force in the Argument drawn here by the Apoftle from the Place from whence he fpeaks. For whatever the Father fhouid fay wou'd be of equal Force, whether he fays it by an Angel on Earth, or by an Angel from Heaven, his Authority being the fame at all Times, and in all Places. Whereas every one eafily fees, that if it be refer'd to Chrift, the Argument has great Force ; be- taufe the Word's fpeaking [or God's fpeak- ing by him] on Earth, is equivalent xo its being faid that he fpeaks [or, that God fpeaks by him] but in the Character of an Angel : Whereas faying that Chrili fpeaks from Heaven, [or, that God fpeaks by him from Heaven] is equivalent to faying, that Chrift fpeaks [or, that God fpeaks by him] as the Son, or the Heir and Lord of all Things : Which is the Argument as i ob- ferv'd before, chap. ii. cv-r. 2, ^. MwTeh'ce feems to have been aware of this, and therefore fays, that the Argument is taken here " from the Manner of Speak- *^ ingj which wa^ an earthly Manner ; as fha- I "' i^ing. „ A 7) T> E N T> A. 159 " king the^Earth,'Cj^. but his fpcaking from '^ Heaven, implies his fpeaking by his Son, " who came from Heaven, and fpoke of hea- '* venly Things, according to Jobn iii. 1 1 , 12, " Or elfe from the Spirit of the Father fent ^* from Heaven, to which he inch'nes". But I fee no Foundation for either of thefe In- terpretations ill the Text ; and I thmk the laft is quite foreign from the whole Defign of this Epiftle. (4) It is added, cer. 28. that fince they had received a Kingdom that cannot be fha- ken, that they fhould adhere to the Gofpel, whereby they might know how to ferve God acceptably, with Reverence and godly Fear : [See Mr. Teircc*s Note on this Verfe] And then fays, 'ver. 29. For our God is a confu^ ming Fire ; i. e. as Jeho-jah the King of the Jez2)s^ fpeaking on Eirth in the Name of the molt High, was aconfuming Fire tothofe that would not ferve acceptably under that Difpenfation ; Chriii, who is our God, [or Lmnamielj God with us] or King in this Kingdom, which cannot be fhaken, is like^ wife a confuming Fire : Agreeably to all the Declarations of Scripture, that He JJjall he YC'jealed in Flaming Fire, taking Venge- ance on all that know not God^ and obey not the Gcfpelof ottr Lord Jefus thrifty 2 Thefl*. i. 7, 8. and to an Expi tflion in this Epiftle, liz. a fearful looking for of fiery Indignation to de-zviir the Adverfaries, chap. x. 27. If this I40 A T) T) E N D A. this be the Senfe of this Verfe, every one fees that the whole PalTage from c^r. 2^. muft be refer'd to Chrift-, and not to the Fa. ther : And if this be not the Senfe, 1 nfiufl own I cannot fee the Beauty, Force, or Em- phafis of this AfTertion of the Author of this Epiftleto the Hebrews. They did n«t want to be told, that the God of the J-ews was a confuming Fire. Their Hiflory gave many Inftances of it. But it has great Force and Beauty if it relate to Chrifl", in order to pre* vent Hebrew - Chriftians from apoftatizing from Chriftianity, to put them in Mind, than Chrid, the God and King of us Chriftians, will be a confuming Fire to rebellious and difobedienr Chriftians, as Jcho'vah the King of the IfrcieUtes was to rebellious and difobe- dienc Jews ; and is the fame Motive againd Apoftacy, that he had us'd chaj^, x. c^r. 26, But after all I can fay to fupport this 0- plnion, it is but a juft Deference due to this incomparable Commentator, to confider the Arguments by which he fupports the con- trary. He endeavours to prove, that it is God the Father who is refer'd to here, by two Arguments drawn from the Prophecy of Hagga'i^ whence this PalTage is quoted by the Author of this Epiftle. He fays, that " It is manifell, from err. 26. that the Per- " fon fpeaking, is He whofe Voice at Mount " Sinai fhook the Earth, and who had pro- I " mifed AT> T> E N T> A, 141 *' mifed by the Prophet Hagga^ that yec ** once more I fhall not only fhake the ^' Eaith, but the Heavens ''. He adds, '' Now '^ if we confult that Prophet, cbap» ii. 6, 7. " we can't reafonably doubt, that God the *' Father is the Perlon who there makes the *' Promife. Foi' not to infilt upon his be- " ing cali'd over and over the Lord of Hojfs^ *' which Title appears peculiar to the Fa- ^' ther: He that Ipeakeih there, is he that *^' promifeth, That the T>efire of all Nations '' JJjall come. And I iuppofe, all will grant, *' that according to the Stile of the Old Te- " ftament, the Father is the Perfon who ^' promifes his People that Chrilt ihouid ^' come. I hope I ihall be forgiven, if I differ from this moft able New Teliament Critick, to whom the World is fo much obliged, and to whom I am fo greatly indebted. But I can- not help thinking, that Lord [or Jehocabi of Hofts in Haggai^ and in the Old Tefta- ment, always figniiies the Word \ and from Lxod. iii. the King of Ifrael^ or of the Boil o^ Ifraeij fpeaking and adling in the Name of the molt High: I hope this will be f jr- given me, the rather (ince I have, in the main, fo able an Old Teitamenc Critick on my Side, as the learned Ainjworth, [See his Commentary on the Tentateticb pajjim.'} Indeed, I think, this is Mr. Teirce\ ori- ginal Miliake, and that has led him here cue 14-1 A "D T> E N ^ A. out of the Way. He takes Lord of Hofts to denote the Father, and then he could not make good the Aportle's Quotation from Hag^ai (which on this Occafion, as on all others, he fcems very intent at all Adven- tures to do for the Honour of the Chriftian Religion ; tho' fometimes not very fortu- nately; without fuppofing the Author of this Epirt le to refer here to the Father. This learned Man adds, " That it is the *' fame Per Ton that promifes, Tbat the Tie- ''^ fire of all Nations JJ? all come ^ which mud '' be the Father ^\ But Mr. Peirce could not juftly lay any Strefs upon this Reafon, becaufe he own'd there was anotherReading, (which he did not diiapprove) and which totally enervates this Argument ; z:iz. The JEleU of all Nations JJjall come : Which is the Reading ot the LXX Ka) yl^&i hAizlci irdvtMv t£v ihuiv. They reading, as he fuppofes, Chamudoth^ for Chemeddath^ in their Copies. See his Note, chap. xii. c?^r. 26. But if the Tie fire of all Nations JJjall come^ be the true Reading, why may notjehocaby the Word^ fpeakmg not in his own Name, but in the Name of the moll High, andconfe- quently perfonau'ng another, fay, /hid jbe T)efiire of all Nations fimll come ; tho' it was himfelf ? [See a like Manner of Speaking, jBxod, xxiii. 20—24 ] Thus I hope I have prov'd by feveral Texts of Scripture, and particularly by He- brews AD "D E N D A. 14.5 hrews xii. 25, 26. (which I have fo large- ly infifted on) that it was the Word who made all the great Appearances and Mani- feftations oF God's Will to our firft Parents, to the Patriarchs, and to the IfraelitiJJj Peo- ple. But we muft always carry it along with us, that he never a£led or fpake in his own Name, but in the Name of the mofl: High, whom he perfonated as his Angel, ading as his chief Minifter and Mellenger, and by his Authority ; without any Autho- rity of his own, as he afterwards did, whea he^ by Inheritance^ obtain d a more excellent Name than the Angels^ being appointed ths Heir of all Tubings, Heb. i. 4. 2. He feems alfo to be call'd, Michael the Arch-angel^ (perhaps for that Reafon, c72. his being the greateft Minifter or MeiTenger, God ever did, or could fend) Jiide 4. Kev, x. 7. i. i Thejf. iv. 16. compar'd with John v. 25. See Mr. Teirce^s Mote on Thilippians^ ii. 9. He is alfo call'd the Trince cf God's Teopk^ 3.nd the Captain [Prince] of God's Hoji, See Jojl.\V. j^, «.l,i5. D^;/. viii. i I. x. i?,2r. xii. 1. And \\.ktw\{Q the 'Prince of Trinces^ Dan. viii. 25. That this Prmce of the Hoft was feho'-jah hiaiielf, who was the King of IfraeX tho' acling in the Ncimeof the moft High, ia the Text [quoted laft, is plain, be- caufe the Santluary recalled H i S ; chat is, the Trinceoj the Hoft s^ Dan. via. 1 1. U I 14-4- A T> 1) E N T> A. I fuppofe, however, that this chief Mini- fter, or MefTenger (who had thefe various Names) was always attended with a Reti- nue, or Hoft of Angels, which made part of the Pillar of Cloud, and the Pillar of Fire, in which he appear'd. See Tfal- Ixviii. 1 7. xviii. 9, 10. civ. ^,4. But His IJebo'vaFs'] Prefence was diftin£i from his Retinue, or any of them : As appears, not only from the Thing it felf, but from the Word Sba- chan^ hahitavit^ whence the Word Shechinah comes, which is often us'd in the Targum^ and by the Rahinical Writers. For tho' the Word might be faid to inhabit a Cloud of Glory, as well as to dwell among us in Flefh afterwards ; yet the Word can't, with the like Propriety, be faid to have inhabited his Retinue. Befides, that the Prefence of Je- hovah was diliin8: from the Retinue of An- gels, or any of them, will farther appear, from comparing JExodiis^ xxxiii. ^ E N "D A. 145 as [he waO in Sinai [when it was] in hoH- nefs^ ver. 18. Now he that was among his Retinue, fure mult be diftind trom them. Perhaps fome will fay to me, in Reply to what I have ju(t now faid, ^' That the mod " High is faid to dwell in Heaven, in Light ^^ and Glory, to be feated on his Throne, *' and to have Chrill fitting on his Right " Hand, (jc. Yet you mult agree, that *' thefe Things are not faid of the moft '' High literally, but figuratively ; that is, " that there are fome peculiar Manifeltati- " ons of his Will, his Wifdom, his Good- " nefs, or his Power, made by fome Mi- " nifter or Minillers of His , to other " Beings : And why may not you then " allow, that all thefe, and fuch like Ex- " preffions in the Texts you have juft quo- " ted, may be us'd figuratively, and not li- " terally of the Word under the Name of " Jehovah ? And then, how do you make '" it appear from thefe Texts that you have " laft quoted, that Jehovah^ the Word^ is '^ diftind from his Retinue of Angels ? If any one ihall put this Queltion to me, I an- fwer, that the Difference is this ; That we muft expound thefe Expreflions figuratively, when they are predicated of the Omnipre- fent and Invifible Being, becaufe every one fees, we cannot interpret them literally of him : But then we muft not depart from the Letter, as all Interpreters allow, when U 2 there 146 AT> T) E ND A. there is no Necedity ; And therefore the Texts that fpeak (^^Jehc^'ah the King of i/;'^^- f/, or the WordV, comings flaying^ cr gciug^ afcending^ or defcendiv^ ,- appear hig^ or difap- f earing \ all th E N T> A, 147 " fpohn to as in thefe lafi T)ays^ hy his " Son : And when he oppofes the Word fpo- « hn B Y A N G E LS to the Word fpoken hy " THE LORD, chap. ii. 2, ^. and alfo " when he aflerts, i-er, 5. That God hath '' 7Wt put the World \_cr J^e~\ to ccme, that " is the 'Kingdom that cant he JJmken^ (as ^'' he expreffes if^ chap. x'i. 28.) or the " Gofpel Kingdom^ to Angels ; hit to the Son " of Man ^ ver. 6 10. It being there *' iirongly implied, that the former Age, " or the yev:ifD State, was in Subjection to *' an Angel or Aogels, and not to the Son of " Man. So that he thinks the Word had *' not any Management over the Je'Wifi " People till he became the Son of Man." This, I tliink (with what will be farther obferved prefentiy) has a!i the Force oF his Argument , as I believe the Keader will think, if he turns to that Preface to which I reter him. And though that incomparable Commentator] Mr. Teirce thinks that the Ac^^, or the Word, had the Management of the Jezzi/Jj People, and fpoke to 'Jojhiia as the Prince of the Hod ; (See his Note on l^hil. ii. 9. (g) ;) yet he thinks the Word never fpoke or appeared, uniefs in that In- ilance, or was ever fent on any Meffages, before He was incarnate : (See his Note, Heh. i. 2. {d)\^ Which however does not feem a very probable Hypothefis. Now I have the Happinefs thus far to agree with thefe excel- 148 A D T> E N ^ A. excellent Writers, that the Son could not fpcak to the Jews before he was a Trophet mighty in Word and T>eed : Yet I have in- deavoured to prove, that th^ Word did fpeak to them and their Anceftors, before He was made Flelh. The only true Solution of this Difficulty, which the Dodor and Mr. Pcirce have urg'd fo ftrongly, is, that the Word, before he was made Flefh, is not in the Stile of the Author of this Epiftle, the Son^ the JLord^ or the Son of Man, but an Jngel^ being then confider'd as the Miniiter and Mellenger of the Father, and acling in his Name and Stead ; though he then was the "Brightnefs of the Father s Glory, and the exprefs Image of his Ferfon, That he was not the Son of Man, before he took Flefh of the Virgin , will readily be allow'd me. That he was not the Lord too, I think will not be much difputed ; becaufe though cal- led Jeho-vah, as I apprehend, (which our Tranflators, as well as the Septuagint, have render'd Lord, though wrongfully , (ince they fhould always have us'd Jehooah as a proper Name, as the learned Jinfworth does every where in his Tranflation of the Fentateuch) yet he did not act in his own Name, but in the Name of the moft High: And Peter makes this the Sum or Conclufi- on of his firll: and long Difcourfe after ChriiVs Afcenfion, Jcls ii. 36. That all the Jloiife of Ifrael (Imdd kncjo ajfuredly^ that God A 7) 7) E N'D A, 149 God hath [viz. now'] made that fame Jefus^ [approved of God among you as a Prophet, ver. 2^.] ':^hom ye have crucified^ hotb LORD a7td Chrift. See alfo AUs v. 50,5 1. and Vhil. W. 11. I think this will be much the more readily allow'd, if it be confider'd, that X E N 7) A. Attributes, Charaders and Offices. And it is in this Sen fe alone, that I underftand the Word to be called an Angel, or an Archan- gel ; and not on Account of his Nature, which is to be fure very different from, and vaftly fuperior to, the Nature of the angelick Rank and Order. And that the Word was not the Son, in theStileof the Author of this Epiftle^ before his Incarnation, notwithftanding that he was tben the 'Bri^htnefs of the Father s Glory, and the exprefs Image of his Terfon^ Heb. 1.2. is plain from the following Confiderations, (i.^ That the Defcription he here gives of the Son did not then agree to him. The De- fcription he gives of the Son, is the Heir of all Things. Now indeed the Jews were his own, or his own People, before He was in- carnate, John i. II. But the Gentiles^ tho' promiied Him as his Inheritance, PfaL ii. 7. were not given aQually into his Poileflion till after his Refurredlioii. Then Jejiis was in- deed DECLARED to he the Son of God, according to the Spirit of Holinefs^ Rom. i. 4. For then it was declared in Words as well as in Fa8", that all Power was gicen him in Heacen and in Earth, Mat. xxviii. 1 8, ( fhac is in a Stile ufual to the Prophets, and to Chriil the great Prophet, (j'c. that all Pow- er would foon and certainly be given him : Juft as he fays immediately after to his Apo- ttles, Go, and teach all Nations ^ though He AT> T> E N T> A. 151 He afterwards bids them Jiay at Jerufalem, till they 'ucere endued with Tower from on High J Luke xxiv. 49.) Thus Jefus was declared xo be che Son of God at his Refur- reclion, according to Tfcih it. 7. 'Thou art my Son^ this T>ay haz'e I begotten thee: which is always apply'd by St. Taul to Chrift's RefurreQion ; but he was not aQu- ally invefted with the Right of Sonihip, cr with the Inheritance, to which he was be- gotten from the Dead, till his Afcenfion: When, as St. Peter fays, He was raifed to David'j Throne^ Acis ii. 30. or exalted by the right Hand of God^ to fit en God^s own right Hand^ till all his Enemies were made his Footfiool : And when, as St. Peter adds, Jefiis was not only made Lord [or Media- tor] but CHRIST [or King'] Ads \'u 53 — ' — 37. Hence it is, that upon Chrift's Exaltation , we are faid to be , not only Heirs of God, but JOINT HEIRS WITH JESUS CHRIST: We being to be deli-vered from the 'Bondage of Corrup- tion into the glorious Liberty of the Sons of God \ and God hacing predcfiinated tis to be conformed to the Imagj of his dear Son : Namely, that as we f offer with Him^ Z€e JJmdd be glorified with Him^ or reign with Him in Glory ^ Rom.viii. 1 7,2 1,30. 2 Tim.ii.i 2. (2.) The Author of this Epiftle fays, ^^r. 4. That Chrift is made fo much better than the Jngeisi in as much as he hath by Inheritance % vb- 151 AT) T> E N "D A. obtained [^r as he hath inhented'\ a more excellent Name than they, [viz. that of a Son, and confequently the Dominion and Authority of a Son.] Now Inheritance al- ways enters into the Notion of Sonfhip : As the Inheritance of Jehcvah was the Jewifh People, ^eiit. xxxii. 9. fo the Inheritance of Chrift is the Chriftian People, {Eph. i. II, 12. In whom alfo we are inherited^ \_ iicM^A/j^iv ] viz. by Chrift ; fee ah"o 2 Pet, ii. 9.) or his Church (which he pur- chafed with his own Blood, jUs xx. 28.) or his Kingdom, and the Power to which he is advanc'd m order to manage it. See Eph, i. 20 — 2 J. iv. 9, 10, Heh, ii. 9, 10. xii 2, And we learn from Fhil, ii. 9. that it was becaufe, thoiiojo he was in the Form {or Jppearance^ of God^ that he emptied hiinfelf and took upon him the Form [or Ap- pearance] of a Ser'vant [or Minifter, 'viz, of the Circumcifion, Kom- xv. 8.] and the Likenefs of Mav^ and that he humbled him- felf by becoming obedient to JJeath^ e-jen the CDeath of the Crofs^ that God bath giien Him a N A M B abo'ue every Name^ that every Tongiiefionld covfefs that Chrifi is Lord. (3.) He is delcribed as the firft "Begotten^ WHEN HE IS BROUGHT IMTO T H E W O R L D, Hek i. 6. If this means his Birth, it will be agreeable to what the Angel Gabriel told the Virgin, Luke i. ?$. The Power of the Hi gh eft JJjall corns upon thee^ I and AT> "D E N T> A. 155 and the Holy GhoftJJjall ocerJJ?adow thee^ there- fore that holy Thing that flmll he horn of thee ^ JlrnUhe called the Son of God. Or if it means his Refurredion, as is moft likely, frooi God's being faid, to hring him again [vraAn'] into the Worlds as Mv'^ Peirce thinks, it is agreeable to the Texts that fpeak of his Refurre^lion , under the Notion of God's begetting him from the Dead. Or if it re- lates to his Coming again the fecond Time into the World, as Mr. J of. Mede^ and fome other of the Millenary Writers think, it is agreeable to thofe Texts, which fpeak of his Coming again with the Angels as obeying his Commands, 3i<^?. xxiv. ^o, 51. and with all other inconceivable Power, Pomp and Glory. And in any of thefe Senfes he could not be the Son, in the Stile of this Epiille, before He was incarnate. ^4.) One of the Texts which is quoted to prove him the Son, is from FfaL ii. 7. Ihon art my Son^ this T^ay ha^je I hegotten Thee. Now St. Paid-t when he quotes this Text, always applies it to the Reiurre£lion of Chrilt ; fee JUsy.\\\. 5^. Heh, V. 5. (5.) Another Text which is quoted to prove him the Son, is from PfaL xlv. 6, 70 'But tinto the Son He faith. Thy Throne, O Gcd^ is for ever and ei'er : A Sceptre of Right e- oiifnejs is the Sceptre of thy Kingdom, Thou had loved Right confnefs and hated Iniquity : Therefore^ God, Thy God hath anointed X 3 thee 154- A T> 7) E NT> A, thee with the Oil of Gladnefs alove thy Fel- lows. Now this evidently belongs to his anointing after his Afcenfion, becaufe it is quoted after Pfal \u 7. which is always ap- plied by St Paul to Chrift's Refurredion ; as has been juil obferv'd. Befides, tho* Je- ftis was anointed as a Prophet (^or as a Teacher, and a Worker of Miracles) in the Days of his Flefh, JUs X: 58 • yet he was not anointed as a Prieft and a King, till af- ter his Afcenfion, when it pleafed the Fa- ther^ that in Him all Fulnefs JJmild dwell -, receiving the Spirit of the Father^ and there- by being anointed for the Adminiilration of tiiat greater Kingdom, that He was to re* ceive beyond his Fellows, Or when, ici other Words of Scripture, by the eternal Spirit, He offered himfelf tmto God in the Heat'ens^ Heb. iv. 15. viii. 4. ix. 24 28. and was covfe crated an high Trieji by the JVord of an Oath for ever^ after the Order of Melchizedeck, chap, vii. 16, 28. But to whichfoever of thefe two Anointings of Je- fus it belongs (and the Scriptures fpeak of no more) it will equally ferve our prefent purpofe. If, as thefe excellent Writers add, it be ask'd, *' How the P^eafoning of the Author *' of this Epinie will (iaiid upon this Hypo- *^. theiis, becaufe his Argument, for a great- " er Attention to the Gofpcl than the Law, " is founded on the greater Authority of the '^ Per- A 1) T> E N T> A. 155 " Perfon that fpoke the Salvation of the " Gofpel, than of the Perfon that fpoke the " Law?" I anfwer, that I agree, that the Auchority of the Perfon that fpoke the Gof- pel is greater than the Authority of the Per- fon that fpoke the Law; but not from the greater Authority of a greater Perfon : (For the Word, before He took Flefh, and after He took Flefh, is the fame Perfon) But only from the greater Authority that refults from the higher Character of the fame Perfon : In as much as the Word , by taking the Body that God had prepared for him , in which He became obedient to Death, and riling again from the Dead, and afcending to the right Hand of Power (or admini- ftring all Power in his own Name) is be- come the Son in the Stile of this Epiltle: Which IS a far higher Character, than that of the Word, before He took Flefh, fpeaking- only as the Minifter and Meffenger of the Father, in the Father's Name : And confe- quently in the Charader of an Jwj^ or Jrchaugel : And it is as good Reafoning in the Author of this Epilile, to fay, '-Give " greater Attention to the xMelTage delivered *^ by the fame Perfon advanced 10 a much " higher Character:" as 10 fay, ''Give *' greater Attention to the MelTage deli- '• vered by an higher Perfon ; " as we fhould all of us agree in any like cafe. There is no doubt but the Toies have paid a 156 A "D T> E N T> A. 2l much greater Attention and Regard to what has been faid to them by the King's Son, the EleUoral Trince of Saxony, fince he was the King of Poland'j- prime Minifter, than they did before. I will here likewife add fome Thoughts, which, if they had been printed in their proper Place, which is juft after Corollary ihe Xth, fhould have made Corollary the Xlth. It is very obvious. That all I have faid of the Means [Mean] of Rehgion in the fore- going Corollaries, and the Main of what I have faid about them in the foregoing ElTay, relates to the great internal Mean of Reli- gion ; that is to fay, the Motive that God has ever propos'd to Mankind to induce them to be Religious : Having faid little more of the great external Mean of Religion (or if you pleafe of the great Mean o^Tro^ cidei/ce) than what was fometimes proper to carry on the Thread of the Difcourfe, ov at leaft is contained in fome incidental Paf- fages of it. But it may not be improper here, to define what I underftand by the great external Mean of Religion [or Provi- dence] the better to diftinguifh it from the internal ; and to fbew, how the Former has kept pace with the Latter, and run through God's feveral Difpenfations. By the great exter- AD 1) E NJ) A, 157 external Mean of Religion or Providence then I underftand, the Method which God has taken with Mankind to prevent their Inattention to this great internal Mean of Religion, or the Motive that was propofed to them, in order to induce them to be Religi- ous. And to what purpofe could that Motive have ferv'd, if a Method had not been ta- ken, to prevent an Inattention to it, and an intire Diffipation of Thought, among the vain or vicious Pleafures of Life ? What I point at is the Separation, which God by various Means brought about, between his own Children and Subjeds, and the Chil- dren and Subjeds of the Devil: Left by the natural Courfe of Things, they fhould have drawn off the Thoughts of God's Chil- dren and Subjedls from their Inheritance in a future Life, through the fooliQi and wicked Amufements of the prefent Life ; if they had not endeavour'd it (iudioufly, and on purpofe ; as it can't be fuppos'd but they would. This external Mean runs vifibly through all God's Difpenfations, in a wife and beautiful Manner, and has been per- fedly adjufted to the Circumstances of Mankind, from the firft to the lall of them ; as I have fhevvn in fome Intiances in this ElTay ; whiKt I have omitted feve- ral others, in order to preferve the Unity of the internal Mean the better. I will there- 158 AT) "D EN T> A. therefore now reprefent the great external Mean in one fhort view, by only ju(t men- tioning the Inftances, where it plainly ap- pears : As I think it will be readily allow- ed it does, in the Separation of the Fami- lies of Cain and Seth : In drowning the old World, when againft all God's Methods and Warnings, the Sons of God would mingle and make Affinity with the Daughters of Men ; • In prefer- ving Koah^ the only righteous Man of that World, who had^ paid Obedience to God's Commands in ^particular Law; as well as in others , to v/hich his Obedience to that particular Command naturally led : In the Confufion of Languages at ^ahel ^ and the Difperfion or Separation that enfued : In God's calling Abra- ham trom among his idolatrous Relations and Friends in Urr of the Cbaldees : —In directing him to a fcparate and {l}litary Life in Canaan ; where, to the lart, he had no PolTeflion befides a Field to bury in 5 and where he took all the Precautions imagin- able againil any manner of Alliance be- tween his Family and the Inhabitants of the Land; as Ifaac and Jacob did afterwards; In directing Ifaac and Jacob to lead the fame manner of Life that Jbrahani had done before: And (when the Famine forced Jacob and his Family to go into Egypt ) in dire^ing Jofepb ( who fenev^ AT) T> E N T> A, 159 knew that the conftant Courfe of God's Providence, as well as the Nature of the Thing, called for a like Separation) to pro- cure Qojhen for their Refidence: A Coun- try where they might live feparate from the Egyptians J and follow a Trade {mz,, of Cattle) which render'd them odious to each other : In carrying them out of Egypt after they had caught its Idolatry in the Brick-kilns of that Country : — — In plaguing Egypt i when the Egyptians would hinder them from going into the Wildernefs to worfliip Jehovah their God, as he had commanded them; and would entice them by their Magicians to the Wor- ship of the Devil : - « In carrying the Children of Ifrael into the Wildernefs, when they were become too numerous to live as a feparate Family ; and fo keeping them at the greateft Diftance from other People, by means of the Place, as well as by ereding them into an earthly Kingdom^ under Himfelf, as their King, as alfo by the Laws he there gave them ; particularly thofe of Circumcifion , Sabbaths , other Feafts and Falts, Sacrifices, one Altar, Vows, Food, Cloaths, Drefs, Pollutions and Purifications, quite different from the Rites of the Heathen, if not oppofite to them J all which Methods were manifeltly intended to prevent any ASinity with the Heathen;^ and even the Converfauon^ Mirth Y and i6o A'D J) EN'P d. and Jollity that leads to it : — ^ In keep- ing this People in the Wildernefs, till the Race that had been tainted with Egyptian Idolatry was quite extind ; and till a new Race was fprung up, that had not been in- feded: A Race, that had been kept fepa- rate from all other People; that knew no God, but the God of Ifrael; and had all along livM on his miraculous Care and Bounty : ^^— In ordering them to deikoy all the Inhabitants of Canaan ^ that they might not mingle with them , ferve their Gods, and learn their Manners: • In keeping them all along a dittind and fepa- rate People, when they were fettled in the Land of Promife: ■ In fending divers Judgments on them, when they or their Kings made Affinity with other Nations, and worihip'd their Gods : In or- dering them to feparate themfelves from the ftrange Wives they had married in their 'Babyhiijh Captivity : — — In preferving them a feparate People wherefoever they were fcattered : [See to this purpofe Dr. nomas Burnetts T)emo7iJiration of true Re- ligion^ Vol.11, p. no — 210:] — And lall of all, in the fmall feparate Society of Difciples, which Jefus gathered in his Life- time ; and the like Societies which his Apo- ftles gathered after his Afcenfion ; when it was vifible, that neither God's fingie Fami- ly, nor his earthly Kingdom^ would reclaim the A T> "D E N^ A. i6i the "World from Idolatry, to the Worfhip of Hirnfelf ; nor keep up Virtue in any great Degree in the Body of Men, to which His Family and the Theocracy were confined: And when yet at the fame Time God had by that fingle Family and Theocracy fufR- ciently prepared Men and Things for the Appearance of Jefus in the Flefh; to the Intent, that inttead of God's having only one People and Nation, he might take to Himfelf a People out of all the idolatrous Countries of the World by Chrifl-, and then give them to him, as his Church, King- dom and Inheritance: By the Means of which feparate Societies (though in a peace- able and orderly Manner) God's People were ftill to be kept a diftin£l and feparate Body from the Idolaters, the Atheifts, the Scepticks, and the Vicious in all thofe Coun* tries, to avoid bemg unequally yoked with themt and to keep themfehcs a peculiar Teople to him^ and his Chrift^ zealous of goodWorks» This ftridter Separation of Chriftians was the more neceffary in the firft Beginnings of Chriftianity , when inftead of any fuch Thing, as a Chriftian Nation in the World, a few Chriftians liv'd every where, among nothing but bigotted fuperftitious Jews or impious Tagans, By thus explaining my Meaning about the great external Mean of Religion, everyone y/iU eafily fee, how it is d^ingnijiJci from S, 2. the i6a AD D EN'D A. the internal Mean of Religion. This is the Motive to the Religion of the End; that is removing what would prevent that Motive's basing prefenc to the Mind ; and confequent- ly frcni having any force on it ; This is fur- iiiihmg die ilrCiij^efi Perfuafive to Piety and Virtue; that is caking away the greateft TemptaLtion againli them : This is a Method to cure the Plague of the Heart ; that is to prevent frefh Inftdion : This is Revelation ; that is Providence. Thus they differ; and this is the Relation they bear to each other. But on the other hand, in this they agree i that as the internal Mean of Religion is one, fo is the external Mean of Religion one alfo. For as the fir ft is the Motive to every Thing thit is good, fo the laft is a Separation fron^ the Bad. They alfo agree in another Parti- cular; that as the one internal Mean of Re- ligion was differently exhibited and afcer- tain'd in different Ages and Difpenfations^ fo was the one great external Mean of Re- ligion differently accompUih'd in them: And finally, that as the one internal Mean of lleligion, differently exhibited and afcer° ^ain'd in different Ages, was yet, in thofe (different Exhibitions and Securities under |hc different Difpenfations^ beautifully pro° yortion'd to the Circumftances of Mankind, and tQ each other ; fo the one great exrernal Mean of lleligion differently accomphlh'd, yet 'well adiufted m that different - Ac- A "D "D E N "D A. 165 Accomplifhment to the different Circura- ftances of Mankind, in thofe Difpenfations j at the fame Time, that every later Method of Accomplifhment bore a juit Proportion to thofe which went before. All which may ferve to fhew ftiil more fully, the great Unity of the main Plot, and the great Sim^ plicity, and beautiful and well proportioned Variety of the chief under-Plots of the great ^rama of moral Providence, in the feve- ral Ages of the World : And is at the fame Time but agreeable to the Methods of God's Providence over the natural World; where the wifeft Defigns are always compafTed by the moft proper and fimple Means ; all bear- ing the -moft beautiful Symmetry and Pro- portion to each other. There have been many other external Means of Religion or Providence, which God has often ufed to prevent a Diftradion of Mens Thoughts, and to procure their At- tention to the internal Mean of Religion„ They are to be met with in feveral Parts of the Bible, and fome of them up and down in feveral Parts of this Eifay. All God^s Mercies and Judgments, Prophecies and Mi- racles, may be rank'd under this Head. But they being Occafional and Various, are not proper for our prefenc Confideration. FINIS. I'here are feveral Mifiakes hy reafon of the Author's-- 'Difiance from the Trefs. T'hofe that are the more confiderable the Reader is dejlred to correH by the follo-wifig Table of Errata. Preface. P. L. i8 22 Compounds read Compends 2,8 pen. Candor read ReJatiom E S S A Y. 5 6 dele and 7 dele eleEiive 6 pen. nil Men read ^w^^/^a lO 2 ith by Nature or i6 25 dele Nature or i8 12 dele exprefs 19 29 xii. 8. xvi. read ix. lo, ir." li. 1 1 Spencers Notion read ?/ /i Notion quoted and com^ tenanced by Spencer 23 1 5 after Gen. xvii. 7. infert xxiv. 42, 48. 28 7 after cekjiial infert powerful. 3^ 26 Ae/orff H