« <» ^'* '^^^^fk^k^ffb'^^^^^Si ,*.»„.,,>., ^^. ^^^ PRINCETON, N. J. '■if. Division X~)^Jts^..Cr^ \ Sec/ion t./^.'i^.\..Ci/, Number \).\ L ^ K A ^ -^- M- -r^ > -^r ■^f JT -ii- .^■ ^ >f r )^- _ ^< HT > •.f --^ AN AMERICAN COMMENTARY ON THE NEW TESTAMENT. EDITED BY ALVAH HOVEY, D.D., LL.D. \L± PIIILAUELPIIIA: AMEKICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, 1420 Chestnut Street. COMMENTARY ON THE REVELATION BY JUSTIN A. SMITH, D. D., IN CONSULTATION WITH JAMES ROBINSON BOISE, Ph. D., D. D., LL. D. PHILADELPHIA: AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, 1420 Chestnut Street. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1884, by the AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. PREFACE. A Commentary on the Apocalypse could not probably be so written as to meet the views of all students of the New Testament. The interpretation of prophecy is always difficult. In this case it is made especially so by the Apocalyptic character of the book. Made up, as Stuart says, " of one continued series of symbols, unaccompanied for the most part by such plain and explicit declarations with regard to their meaning as are generally to be found in like cases among the prophecies of the Old Testament," whatever theory of interpretation for the book is adopted remains still a theory, however confidently presented, with no such ultimate test of its accuracy as to compel assent. The only course open to an expositor, in such a case, is to study the book itself faithfully, with such helps as may be available to him, keeping strictly to the text, and making it his business to ascertain and state the meaning of the text, leaving at one side, so much as is possible to him, all preconceptions and prepossessions. It is only just that the writer of this preface should assume the entire responsi- bility of the method of interpretation used in the commentary now offered to the reader, as well as of the work in general, which appears in it. Dr. Boise's state of health, together with the pressure of professional duty, has made it impossible for him to undertake more than what relates to Greek construction • and critical exegesis, save that the section in the Introduction upon the language and literary style of the Apocalypse is written by him. All the manuscript, however, has been read to him, and questions of textual reading, of rendering, and of exegesis as involved in these, have been carefully examined ; the present writer havin^ o-reat pleasure in leaving all such questions to be determined by one whose life-lono- experience as a Greek instructor, and whose devotion, now, to sacred studies, together with his recognized eminence as a scholar, entitle him to rank as an authority in whatever concerns New Testament criticism. The nature of the work here undertaken seemed to warrant the writer of this commentary in varying somewhat the procedure which may be preferred by those PREFACE. who are culled upon* to deal in a similar way with other of the New Testament books. Points present themselves from time to time that require more of expan- sion than is practicable in the exposition proper. These are treated in the form either of " General Comments," or of " Excursus." Some of the more general aspects of the exposition itself are considered in connection with these separate divisions. It is hoped that a more clear, as well as a more full presentation of some of the more difficult subjects requiring distinct treatment has thus been practicable. Perhaps there is no book of the Bible the literature of which is in a certain way so little helpful to an expositor, as that of the Apocalypse. Learned works upon this remarkable portion of the inspired volume do, indeed, abound, and these in matters of special exegesis are often very serviceable. But the views of the writers are so utterly conflicting, for the most part, as to the general scheme of interpretation adopted, that the student of them soon finds himself driven to take from each whatever of useful suggestion he may find there, and then proceed independently in his search for the meaning and lesson of the book. In preparing this commentary, a somewhat wide range of reading and investigation has been practicable. The works mainly used have been those of Alford, Lange, Hengsten- berg, Diisterdieck in Meyer, Carpenter in Ellicott, The Speaker's Commentary, Stuart, Auberlen, Ziillig, Wetstein, Elliott's Horoe. Apocalypticce, Wordsworth, Farrar, besides lectures of Edward Irving, and of Dr. Vaughan, formerly of the Middle Temple : and, as among older writers, Bengel, Brightniau, Dunbar, jSIede, and others. The scheme of interpretation adopted is in some measure eclectic, and still to a considerable extent independent. The w'riter has not been ambitious to construct a scheme of his own, but has aimed to combine what seemed susceptible of use and safe to adopt, in the commentaries, especially of Ellicott, Alford, and Lange, with much use, in matters of critical exegesis, of Diisterdieck and Stuart. To the great scholars and writers who have been his companions in this study during some three years and a half, he owes a debt of obligation which no merely formal words of recognition and thanks could ever repay. For the most part, the Greek text of Westcott and Hort, which was made also the chief textual basis of the Revision printed in this volume along with the auth(jrized version, has been followed in our own exposition. There is less occasion to go back of the excellent work of Westcott and Hort, and the manuscripts so much relied upon by them, in any inquiry after the true text, as the variations in the Apocalypse among manuscripts, though very numerous, are less vital in character than in some other of the New Testament books. Manuscript authority, PREFACE. however, has been consulted where thought necessary, and the aim has been, so far as possible, to ascertain the text which most accurately represents that of the inspired author himself. To the writer of these pages, the months of study devoted to this marvelous book make up a section of his life hereafter to be looked back upon with peculiar feelings. So difficult a work would not, probably, have been undertaken, only for the assurance of cooperation on the part of the beloved and honored scholar who has more than redeemed every promise of aid, ani as well the conviction that in passing through the hands of the Editor of that series of commentaries, what he should write would be met with a scrutiny than which none could be more capable or more generous. To have been associated with Dr. Boise and Dr. Hovey in a service of this kind is of itself occasion for the deepest satisfaction, while the work itself has been self-rewarding in no common degree. J. A. SMITH. Chicago, Januaiy 15, 1883. INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. I. ITS AUTHOR. At the opening of the Book of the Acts, we find two of the apostles standing forth with special prominence, and in intimate association. These are Peter and John. In those events which signalized the opening of the New Dispensation, these two are intro- duced in company, and so acting and speaking as jointly to represent their brethren in the apostleship. Of the two, however, Peter is the one who speaks and acts most in the capacity of a leader, and who, contrary to what we should have anticipated of him — as that disciple whose courage and loyalty so signally failed at the critical moment — appears, evidently, as the organizer of the infant church. In due time another figure appears upon the scene. The function of the organizer becomes less conspicuous, while that of the doctrinal teacher fills the foremost place. This is assigned to Paul. But there remained still another. A time was to come when, the organization and order of the church having been settled, and its doctrine so fully set forth as to endow it for the office it should fill to the end of time, as a witness to the truth, the opening scenes of its contact and conflict with the world-powers, which should resist, and sometimes hinder its progress, would be unfolded in such a manner as to make it fitting that some indication be given as to what the future of the church should be. Thus it comes about that the last of the sacred books — the consummating pages of Inspiration — takes the form of pi-nphecj/. And so while to Peter was assigned pre- eminently the organizing, and to Paul the teaching function, to John was assigned that of the prophet of the New Dispensation. Of all the apostles — not excepting Paul himself — John was that one on every ac- count best suited to the Apocalyptic office which thus fell to him. As we study this final book of the New Testament revelation ; as we enter into its spirit ; and especially as we observe in what prominence the person of the glorified Jesus comes forth into the field of view — we realize the fitness of that selection which makes the Beloved Disciple the recipient of these divine communications, and the medium through which they should be transmitted to the church of all the future ages. No one of the whole number — as his Gosjiel and Epistles testify when comjiared with other writings of the New Testament, rose so easily to the plane of those revelations which exhibit the person of the Son in his divine oneness with the Father, and in which all spiritual realities stand forth, less as doctrinal media through which to grasp eternal things, than as the eternal things themselves. No one of them could say with such truth as himself: "Truly, our fellow- ship is with the Father, and with his Son, Jesus Christ" (1 John i. 3) ; it is he that we find saying: "The Life was manifested, and we have seen it and bear witness, and show unto you that Eternal Life which was with the Father, and was manifested unto 7 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. us" (1 John i. 2). John entered, as none of his brethren did or could, into the spiritual arcana of the New Dispensation, and was prepared bj^ his very mental constitution, still more by his peculiar spiritual attainments, for the wonderful visions in which a Revela- tion, in form and substance so transcendent, was to be made. Over the (jucstion whether the Apostle John was indeed the author of this book, there has been much controversy. Two facts in this connection are significant : (1) that his authorship was first questioned through what Carpenter, in EUicott's Commentary, terms "doctrinal prejudice" ; (2) that, as is agreed on all hands, the oldest and earliest witnesses testify to the Johannean authorship, beginning with Justin jNIartyr, about the middle of the Second Century, and coming down to the middle of the Third. At the date last given, an active controversy was in progress between two schools of Scripture interi>retation — one of these carrying the allegorical, the other the literal, method to an extreme. By the latter school, passages, especially in the Apocalypse, referring to the millennium, had been taken in a grossly literal and material sense, giving offense to those better instructed and more judicious. Dionysius of Alexandria, who belonged to the former school — the allegorical — in opposing these views, was much disturbed by the use made of the Apocalypse; and not satisfied with showing that the Chiliastic teachings which he combated were a perversion of the teaching of this book, he went so far as to question the apostolical authority of the book itself He admitted it to be the work of some "holy and inspired man" ; but denied that he was an apostle. It was at this time (about A. D. 247), and under these circumstances, that the Johannean authorship of the book was first called in question, at least in any reputable quarter. The later objections to the Johannean authorship of the Apocalypse, originate in much the same way as the earlier ones, and proceed upon very much the same grounds. "Doctrinal prejudice" predisposed to a hostile view of the question — the Christology of this book, perhaps, so distinct and emphatic in its recognition of our Lord's divinity, offending one class ; while its millenarian teachings were equally offensive to others. The critical tendencies and methods, also, of the present age, find in the book a peculiar opportunity. Its character and structure are remarkable. In its style, it bears some features of singular contrast with other writings of the same apostle. It is difficult of consistent interpretation, and has so often been used in support of wild theories as to fulfillments of prophecy, that some of the discredit justly suffered bj' them reacts upon the authority so unjustifiably quoted in their behalf From all this it has resulted that first the inspiration, and then as involved in this, the apostolical authorship, of the book have been denied ; meanwhile even some, who would allow it a certain measure of canonical authority, are unwilling to admit that it was written by the Beloved Disciple himself The subject cannot be treated at large, here. Briefly we touch upon the evidences sustaining the view so long, and still held by the great body of instructed Christians, classifying them as follows : I. External Evidences. (a) The testimony of Christian writers nearest in point of time to the date of the book itself— such as Justin Martyr, A. D. 96 (?)-]66; Melito of Sardis, died 171 ; Theoph- ilus of Antioch. died 180; Irenaeus. 140-202; Tertullian, 160-220; Clement of Alexan- dria, 160-215; Origen, 185-253. All these are express in their testimony to the fact that John wrote the Apocalypse. Though Eusebius, the historian, treats the point as undetermined, he does so in the face of these testimonies; while writers subsequent to his date, such as Basil the Great, Athanasius, Ambrose, Cyprian, Augustine, Jerome, SI) far from sharing in his doubt, constantly quote the book as written by the Ajjostle INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 9 John. Such a concurrence of testimony on the part of those in a position to determine a question of this sort, and in every other way deserving of credit, could be set aside only by opposing evidence of the most conclusive kind. (/>) The only other theory as to the writer in whose behalf the authorship of the book may be claimed, deserving of notice, is that which assigns it to a person of whom very little is known, named John the Presbyter. He is mentioned by Papias, in a pas- sage of doubtful import, not as making him the author of the Revelation, but as one of those to whom he represents himself as applying for information upon subjects of Christian teaching. Eusebius also mentions a report that at Ephesus there were two monuments, each bearing the name of John, the one being taken for that of John the Apostle, the other for that of John the Presbyter. Jerome, however, referring to the same tradition, adds that some in his time were of the opinion that the two monuments were memorials of the same person — Johaimis Eoaiigelhtce — "John the Evangelist." In a word, the very identity of the second John — John the Presbyter — is so doubtful, and there is such an utter lack of indication that, even if this person ever existed, he was capable of writing such a book as the Revelation, that the naming of him in this connection seems like the desperate expedient of the mere controversialist. II. Internal Evidences. (a) Of these should "be mentioned : first, the fact that the author of the book names himself John. In four places he does this (1 : 1, 4, 9 ; 22 : 8). The manner in which the name is introduced in these places implies (1) that it was a name well known, and the identity of the writer sure to be recognized by those to whom the book was originally ad- dressed ; (2) that his relation to the Seven Churches named in the early part of the book was such as to make him a suitable medium for communication to them in that tone of authority and admonition which he employs. It is known that the Apostle John spent the closing years of his life among the churches of Asia Minor, and that he held amongst them a position wholly consistent with the attitude toward them that he here assumes ; (3) in the third mention of his own name by the author of the book (1 : 9), one is re- minded of those words of the Lord to John, with his brother James (Mark 10 : 38, 39), while they are at the same time in eminent keeping with what is known of the tender, sympathizing, and fraternal spirit of the Apostle John; (4) Prof. Stuart calls attention to the similarity, in language and tone, between the allusion to himself by the writer of the Revelation in chapter 22 : 8, and a like allusion in the Gospel by John, 21 : 24, as having struck him "with great force." In the latter place we read : "This is the disciple which testifieth of these things, and wrote these things" ; in the former : "And I, John, saw these things and heard them." In every one of these instances, therefore, it may be claimed that the mention made of himself by the writer, is in perfect con- sistence with the theory that he is none other than the Apostle John. {h) The light in which John exhibits Christ in this book — its Christology — is an important point of internal evidence. The expression, for example, in 1 : 1, "which God gave unto him," Christ, harmonizes with the general teaching of John's Gospel as to our Lord's divinity, where, as Hengstenberg saj^s, the apostle "constantly makes state- ments which imply that the Son has everything that the Father has, and yet has nothing but what he has received of the Father." Stuart, taking the same view in general, mentions as an important point of internal evidence, "the Christology of the Apocalypse in respect to the dependence of the Saviour on God the Father, for his doctrinal and instructions, '^ as being "strikingly in unison with that of John." Having compared the words, "which God gave unto him," with such passages in the Gospel as 10 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 17:7,8; 5:19,20; 7:16, he adds: "Elsewhere in the New Testament different modes of expressing this relation may be found ; but they are unfrequent, and wanting in the special resemblance here indicated." (c) The use of the term Logos as indicative of a person, and as a distinctive title of our Lord. This usage occurs nowhere in the New Testament, save in the Gospel by John, in his first Epistle, and in the Apocalypse. As Stuart says, "it seems to be purely Johannean." ((/) Among resemblances between the Apocalypse and the Gospel by John, which may be viewed as in some sense casual, and still for that reason all the more noticeable, Ls the circumstance that while John is the only one of the evangelists who, in the history of our Lord's crucifixion, mentions the fact that his side was pierced with a spear, we find in the llevelation an allusion to the same circumstance at 1 : 7 — "they also wliich pierced him." Those who have treated the two passages critically, call attention also to the fact that the Greek word used, both in the Gospel and the Revela- tion, for "pierced," is different from that in the Septuagint Version of the prophet Zechariah (12:10), which in the Gospel is mentioned as fulfilled in the incident described. The Septuagint translators use one word (KaropxeVoc), and the author of the Gospel and the Revelation another {tKK(vTi<^. This difference on the one hand and identity on the other, in the use of words to express the same idea, is regarded as pointing to identity of authorship in the case of the two books last mentioned. (') It is in the Gospel of John that Jesus is pointed out as "the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world." No other of the evangelists gives him this title. In the Revelation it is so given no less than twenty-two times. This free use of the symbol seems highly consistent with the marked and emphatic manner in which, twice in the same chapter (John 1 : 29, 36), the same writer records the testimony of John the Baptist concerning the Messiah : "Behold the Lamb of God ! " (/) Other points of evidence might be named, in the verbal usage of the Revela- tion, as compared with other writings of the Apostle John. These, however, require for their adequate presentation a more critical treatment than will be practicable here. II. LANGUAGE AND LITERARV STYLE. "VVe present above, all that our limits will allow, in support of the commonly received opinion, that the writer of the Fourth Gospel, of the Epistles of John, and of the Apocalypse, is one and the same person ; though at different periods in his life, with widely different surroundings and mental conditions. A point of difficulty is suggested as regards the language and literary style. How the three causes just named may influence the style of a writer, might be illustrated at length. Our own literature presents many and striking examples. Whatever difficulties, therefore, we encounter in Ktuilyini: the language of those parts of the New Testament attributed to John, the Beloved Discii)le and Apostle, though they may appear great, they are not, we think, insurmountable, and may be intelligently explained by a suitable regard to the points above mentioned. A word will be in place here respecting the nature of the linguistic difficulties. The fJreek scholar, in reading the Fourth Gospel, finds it written in tolerably good Greek, with comparatively few di^partures from the literary language of the time ; but on turning to the Apficalyp.se, he is at once struck with ungrammatical constructions, more numerous and more marked than in any other part of the New Testament. Those INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 11 which we have noticed most frequently are a neglect of the ordinary rules of agree- ment, and the repetition of the personal, after the relative pronoun, in the manner of Hebrew writers. By the side of this difficulty, which we shall frequently attempt to account for, and more than counterbalancing it in our judgment, we will mention one point that we have not seen presented elsewhere. The young scholar finds all the writings attributed to John very easy Greek. He can in the same time and with the same eifort, "get out" a much longer lesson, so as to recite it satisfactorily, in the Apocalypse, or the Fourth Gospel, or in the Epistles of John, than in any other part of the New Testament. The contrast in this one respect to the style of Paul, or of Peter, or of Jude, is most remark- able, and is something which the young student, comparatively unfamiliar with Greek, can appreciate even better perhaps than the most profound Greek scholar. This undoubted fact must be owing to the structure of the language ; and marks it, not only as peculiar, but also as similar. Granting, therefore, that there is a similarity in this one respect, at least, in all the writings commonly attributed to the Apostle John, we next inquire. Is there any possible way, any rational method of accounting for the irregularities in the style of the Apocalypse? The comparison which we now make, with a view to this question, will be, as is usual, between the Fourth Gospel and the Apocalypse. Supposing the Gospel to have been written about 78 A. D., and the Apocalypse about 95 or 96 A. D. (the dates more commonly given), we have an interval of seventeen or eighteen years. The Gospel was probably written before the vigor of manhood had at all abated, and while the writer was surrounded with a Greek-speaking population. It was perfectly natural that the Gospel should be composed with care, with patient thought, and in tolerably correct Greek, such as the writer daily heard around him. The Apocalypse, on the other hand, seems to have been composed in extreme old age, in the rapture of ecstatic visions, and in a desolate island. Circumstances and states of mind differing more widely can hardly be imagined. It was natural that the man of advanced years should revert in some respects to the dialect of his youth, to the inaccurate Greek which he must often have heard and spoken in his native Galilee. A similar phenomenon is often witnessed, if we mistake not, in old age. It was also natural that the gorgeous visions which passed vividly and rapidly before him, filling him with rapture, should give to his style a peculiar form and coloring, which did not appear when the writer was in a more calm and deliberate frame of mind. These two considerations, both separately and in combination, do not seem to have been sufficiently weighed. They are to us a satisfactory explanation of the differences in language between the earliest and the lategt writings of John the Apostle. We mention one consideration more, which might lead one to expect a new and peculiar style in the Apocalypse. The subject-matter is new ; differing widely from that of any other book of the New Testament. It more nearly resembles portions of the Old Testament. While therefore we find many words and expressions in the Apocalypse that remind us of the other writings of John, it is not strange that we discover much in the phraseology that is new, with Hebraisms originating in the fact that so often the visions and imagery of the ancient Hebrew prophets are reproduced in his own. If, then, these four points — difference of age of the writer, difference of sur- roundings, difference of mental conditions, and difference of subject-maitter — if all these are properly weighed, we need not be surprised at the discovery of some marked 12 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. diflFerences of style and of language ; and that they would be just what we find them Bcems natural. III. WHERE AND WHEN WRITTEN. The place where the book was written is sufficiently indicated by the author himself —"the isle that is called Patnios" (1 : 9). " Patmos, now called Patina and Patmosa, is a locky island in the ^gean Sea, situated not far from the coast, to the south of Ei)hesus, a short distance from Samos. It is little more than one huge rock proji'cting out of the sea; and at the time of the apostle's exile was probably without inhabitants, unless it might be other prisoners, and those who had charge of the place aij a ])rison." — {MaalotKtld.) The date of the authorshii) is a question of more difficulty. Upon this point, only two theories will need to be noticed here : (1) That which fixes this date near the end of the reign of the Emperor Domitian, about A. D. 95, or A. D. 96 ; and (2) that which places it in the reign of Nero, about A. D. 68. This latter date would make the writing of the Revelation precede the destruction of Jerusalem, an event that occurred A. D. 70. An important question of interpretation thus becomes involved in that of the time at which the book was written. Stuart, with others, adopting the historical method of treating the synibolism of the book, makes an important portion of it — chapters 5-11. — relate to the overthrow of Jerusalem, the final destruction of the Jewish State, and the close of the Judaic Dispensation. To this theory it becomes necessary, of course, that the writing of the book should antedate these events ; and as it is agreed that the exile to Patmos occurred under the reign of a persecuting emperor, that of Nero is fixed upon. The limits necessary to be observed in this Introduction will allow us, in speaking of these two theories, to notice only the chief points of evidence touching the question in hand. I. It is natural to revert, first of all, to such witness as may be found on the part of those who were in a position to have personal knowledge upon this subject. Of this — the testimony of early Christian writers — there is not much of a specific kind ; and even this appears to rest mainly upon a single passage of one writer — Irenasus. But Irenjcus is very explicit, to the efiiect that "the Apocalypse was seen not long ago; but nearly in our own time, near the end of the reign of Domitian." Irenaeus, as a disciple of Polycarp, who was himself a disciple of John,, was in a position to be well informed upon a subject of this kind. Other writers near the time of Irenaeus, make similar statcniciits, following, apparently, the authoi'ity of Irenaeus himself. Various attemjits an; made to explain away this passage in Irenasus ; to invalidate its authority, as itself founded — so these writers claim — upon a doubtful tradition, or as susceptible, in some parts of it, of a different rendering. After careful study of the argument, we find ourselves unconvinced, that by any such means the testimony in question can be set aside, or substantially shaken. H. The argument in favor of the earlier date (a. d. 68, or at some time imdcr the reign of Nenj), rests, apart from its criticism of reasons given for the later one, largely upon pa.s.sagt's in the Apocalypse itself, which are supposed to demand for their exposi- tion a date lor the writing preceding that of the destruction of Jeru.salem. It is quite clear that the interpnitation cannot be allowed to fix the date, and then the date to determine the interjiretation. That method of reasoning cannot, of course, be admitted in any case. The objectitms to this date are such as follow : INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 13 (1) The positive testimony of the early Cliristian writers, who name Domitian as the emperor under whose reign the persecution occurred in wliich John was exiled to Patmos, and the Revelation was written. (2) The lack of historical evidence, that the persecution under Nero reached so far as to Asia Minor ; or, indeed, was felt beyond Rome itself Numerous passages in the Revelation imply that it was written at a time when bloody persecutions of the Chris- tians widely prevailed, as was the case under Domitian, but not under Nero ; white the exile of the writer himself to Patmos, which may well have occurred under Domitian, is not likely, for the reason named, to have done so under Nero. (o) The condition of the Seven Churches of Asia to whom the epistles in the opening chapters of the book are addressed, make it seem impossible that the date of the writing should have been so early. Hengstenberg justly regards this evidence as decisive. If the Revelation was written in the time of Nero, not above six or seven years can have elapsed since the writing of the Epistle to the Ephesians by Paul. What the condition of the church was at that time, may be inferred from the tone of this epistle. Is it con- ceivable that in so short a space of time so great a change can have taken place ? The condition of all these seven churches, unless it should be that of Philadelphia, is such as could occur only after the lapse of a considerable period, when the influence of the per- ' sonal apostolic ministry had in some degree declined, when the false teachers, such as the Nicolaitanes, had crept in, and when an insidious spirit of worldliness had corrupted the original simplicity and purity. If we fix the date of these seven epistles toward the end of Domitian' s reign, some thirty years will have passed since the founding of the churches in Asia Minor ; an interval sufficient, but only sufficient, for the development of such changes as the whole record implies. ' The various theories that assign for John's exile and the writing of the book other dates, such as the reign of Claudius, that of Galba, or that of Trajan, need not be dis- cussed here. We may close what we have to say on this point with the words of Alford : "We have a constant and unswerving tradition that St. John's exile took place, and the" Apocalypse was written, towards the end of Domitian' s reign. With this tradition, as has been often observed, the circumstances seem to agree very well. We have na evidence that the first, or Neronic, persecution extended beyond Rome, or found vent in condemnation to exile. Whereas, in regard to the second, we know that both these were the case. . . . These things then being considered — the decisive testimony of primitive tradition, and the failure of all attempts to set it aside, the internal evidence furnished by the book itself, and equal failure of all attempts by an unwarrantable interpretation to* raise up counter evidence — I have no hesitation in believing with the ancient Fathers and most competent witnesses, that the Apocalypse was written near the end of the reign of' Domitian, i. e., about the year 95 or 96 A. D." IV. THEORIES OF INTERPRETATION. The various theories of interpretation adopted in the exposition of the Apocalypse may be classed as principally three. As Auberlen states them, these are: (1) "The church-historical view," which "regards the Revelation as a prophetic compendium of church history, and supposes that the exalted Saviour has revealed therein the chief events of all centuries of the Christian era, in detail, and with chronological accuracy." (2) "The second view is peculiar to those circles of modern German theology who deny ' the genuineness of Daniel. They start with a conception of pro]ihecy which excludes a real beholding of the future, revealed by God. Hence they limit the view of John, as ' 14 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. well as that of Daniel, to his contemporary history. . . . This exegetical view is . generally accompanied by the critical view, that the Gospel of John and the Apocalypse cannot be by the same author." (3) The third view starts from a belief in real predictions. It does not even deny the possibility of prophecies so minute and special _as the interpreters belonging to the first class find in the Apocalypse; but it denies "that the New Testament Apocalypse, as it lies before us, de facto, is or was intended to be a detailed history of the future. These general schemes of interpretation are, of course, variously modified in the hands of different writers. Bengel, for example, with whom the first, or ''church- historical" view originated, carries chronological calculations to an extreme, leading the way in those interpretations that claim to find exact explanations of Apocalyptic numbers, and even fix the dates of events yet future. Elliott, in ""Horce Apocali/pti^ce," employs the same general method, but dwells less upon efforts to determine with exactness questions of "times and seasons," and differs from Bengel, at many points, in the historical events he selects as fulfillments of Apocalyptic traditions. Gaussen and Barnes follow Elliott in many things ; but differ from him as to some of the methods proposed for bringing the history and the prophecy into unison. The "church- historical" method was, at one time, the favorite one with writers upon this book. The often arbitrary manner, however, in which expositors have chosen out of the liistory the events to be claimed as fulfilling the prophecy, and the many instances in which interpretations before the event, based upon chronological computations, have failed of support in the event itself, have cast much discredit upon it, and have placed it, in the view of many at least, in the category of conjectures, or as mere exploits of human ingenuity. The second general method of interpretation needs only a bare mention here. It is thoroughly rationalistic, unscriptural, aud self-destructive. Surely, nothing can be less "rational" than to expound a "revelation" as revealing only that which history has already recorded — a "prophecy" as being no prophecy at all! Besides that this theory, whether applied to Daniel or the Revelation, creates far more difficulties than it removes. The latest results of careful, scholarly study of this subject, seem, for the most part, to favor the third method of interpretation noticed above. This theory recognizes, without reserve, the prophetical character of the Apocalypse. It views the book as a "revelation," in prophetic form, of the purpose of God, as respects both the Church of Jesus Christ and the world in which it abides, from the opening of the Christian Dispensation to its very close. In this general and large sense, it is therefore " church- historiciil." But it does not attempt details of the kind so often found impracticable and delusive. The actors on the great Apocalyptic scene it views more as powers and prinn'ph's, than as intlin'dudJs, and traces fulfillments, therefore, more in the line of great movements, than in that of special events. The unfolding and application of this method of interpretation in the exposition which follows must, for the most part, be left t^) ajtpcar in the expo.sition itself A few chief points only can be indicated here. As all writers upon the Apocalypse, so far as we know, are agreed, the outline study of the book finds its contents falling naturally into three main divisions. The first is introductory, and embraces the three first chai)ters. This includes the exordium proper, and those letters or niessages to the Seven Churches, which, while supplying a basis to what follows, are suited to prepare the reader of every age for the mingled admonition and encouragement of the succeeding visions. With the fourth chapter, the more INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 15 strictly Apocalyptic portion of the book begins. To the end of the eleventh chapter, in a series of striking pictures, future things in their relation to the Kingdom of God in this world are set forth, in a way to forewarn the church in each age of the testing trials that are coming, and at the same time to show how God is "for" it, in judgments visited upon a persecuting and ungodly world, and in the final complete triumph, when the kingdoms of this world finally "become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ." With the twelfth chapter another series of visions opens, in which the same general scene is presented ; but at new points of view, and in a new aspect. It begins with the very opening of the Dispensation — the birth of the man-child. Consistently with this feature at the beginning, it personifies, under a new system of imagery, the forces entering into the great spiritual contest, running through centuries, with such variety of awful vicissitude, to the end of time. This division of the book closes with the nineteenth chapter. The twentieth chapter may be treated as transitional. In it "the mystery of God ' ' is finally finished, and " the time of the end" comes. From the begin- ning of the twenty-first chapter to the close of the book, the final happy condition of the redeemed is set forth, under a vivid symbolism, which might almost be said to exhaust the capabilities of even inspired imagination. In connection with the general view of the method of interpretation followed in our exposition, a variety of special questions arise, which, however, our space will not allow us to consider now. We leave them, therefore, for particular examination in our treat- ment of the text. V. SYMBOLISM OF THE BOOK. The symbolism of the Apocalypse we regard as susceptible of a classification which may shed light upon its exposition. This classification is based upon the outline view of the book already indicated. Passing by the Introduction, when we come to the first series of visions (ch. 4-11), we find upon examination that while, as in those which follow, there is a reproduction of the symbolism used in Old Testament prophecy, it is that symbolism as it occurs in a particular connection. Even the opening of this part of the Revelation, its Theophany — its sublime description of that manifestation of God which the seer beholds through the open door of heaven — is strictly in keeping with that found in the opening chapters of Ezekiel, and which introduces the long array of God's judgments, alike in punishment of his people's degeneracy, and in the destruction of their enemies. The symbolism that follows, as foreshadowing the retributive dispensa- tions coming upon the apostate church and the ungodly world, is almost a reproduction of that in Ezekiel and in Joel. Compare, for example. Rev. 6 : 4-6, with Ezek. 4 : 9-17, where the symbols representative of famine are used ; also. Rev. 6 : 8, 9, with Ezek. 5 : 10-13, where pestilence is threatened and described. Then, where the locusts are intro- duced in Revelation, with other attendant judgments and miseries, the reader recognizes, at once, the imagery already made familiar in the prophecy of Joel. In the description of the Two Witnesses, distinct reference is made to that passage in Zechariah which speaks of Joshua the high-priest, and Zerubbabel the civil governor, as representing the spiritual order of the Judaic Dispensation, on the one hand, and its secular order upon the other, symbolized in the candlesticks and the olive trees, "standing before the God of the earth." The measurement of the Temple, in Rev. 11, reminds us at once of a like representation of the Jewish polity found in Ezekiel ; while the direct and specific mention of "the great city, where also our Lord was crucified" (Rev. 11 : 8), in a yet more pointed way indicates that the symbolism in this part of the book follows a line of 16 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. representation having reference to the kingdom of God in its Judaico-Christian concep- tion. In other words, we view this part of the prophecy as representing the church, in its general idea as the kingdom, under that view which Paul, in some of his epistles, malvos so prominent, viz., as the true Israel. A marked indication of this is the sealing of the " luindred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of Israel," described in the seventh chapter. When we come to the second division in our analysis of the book (ch. 12-19), we notice a remarkable change in the character of the symbolism. The likeness to Old Testament symbolism is retained, but to this, as we find it in another of the Old Testa- ment books — the Book of Daniel. The imagery used by him to represent certain great world-powers, in their nature, action, and destiny, is again used by John in his picture of like things and hke events. It is a change in the sjaubolism corresponding to the change ill the point of view. There is a succession of "beasts" combining in themselves attri- butes of those most ferocious, and seeking, as is their nature, to waste, consume, and destroy ; yet, as it is represented in Daniel, themselves consumed and destroyed in the end. The representation of organized antichrist! ui powers as "Babylon," recalls the very scene of Daniel's own visions and prophecies, while the angelic ministries used remind us of that which he himself enjoyed. The conception of the church as a woman in heaven clothed with the sun, symbolizing the Kingdom of God, and the man-child to, whom she gives birth, recalls Daniel's " one like the Son of man," who "came with the clouds of heaven." Under this symbolism, as a whole, we seem to have presented the Kingdom of God in its more direct conflict with the power of the world ; a more distinct personification of those forces that stand arrayed against each other during the whole period of gospel propagation — spiritual, heavenly, gracious upon the one hand ; worldly, devilish, destructive on the other — and a more decided and exj^ress indication of the essential character of each. In the concluding chapters of the book (21, 22), the imagery carries us back to the first chapters of the Old Testament, and to the beginning of things in this world, as if to make more vivid the truth that, in making "all things new," the Redeemer follows the pattern of that which, as Creator, he originally framed. There are " new heavens " and "a new earth" ; not as the old, but a heaven and an earth "wherein dwelleth righteousness." There is a paradise, after the similitude of the original one; only in this the garden becomes a city. It is no longer open to invasion, as the first Eden was ; but has walls and gates for defence ; and into it shall enter no manner of abomination, nor anything that '' loveth and maketh a lie." Through this city flows the River of Life, and in the midst of the broad street of the city is the Tree of Life. Thus is the old restored in the new — restored in myriad-fold splendor, beauty, and delight ; and so as to be tluinceforth forever secure. Any dis(;ussion in detail of Apocalyptic symbolism, including that of Apocalyptic numbers, will be best reserved for the exposition. VI. CHARACTER OF THE BOOK. As John is the prophet of the New Dispensation, so the book we arc to study is its propheri/. Whatever of this nature appears in earlier parts of the New Testament is mostly what we may venture to term prophetic glimpses. It conies into the narrative or tlie discussion as incidental, rather than as composing the main subject. This is true ev«Mi iif thdsi; mnarkabli! predictions of our L)rd in the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth of Matthew. These are given in answer to an inquiry of the disciples ; and while they INTEODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 17 are not, indeed, to be treated as merely casual utterances, but weighty announcements as to things even now future — some of them — deserving the most reverent and thought- ful study ; yet it is made plain in many ways, there and elsewhere in the record, that our Lord did not appear as a prophet, in the sense of having it for his peculiar office to declare things to come. Indeed, he more than once checked his disciples when they sought to gain from him something of that knowledge of the future which it is so natural for men to desire. The day and the hour, the "times and seasons," especially, he treated as things not within the province of his personal nnnistry ; and indeed only announced those coming events that stood in some such relation to the purpose of that ministry as made their announcement not only suitable, but necessary. In the preaching and the epistolary writing of the apostles, a like thing appears. There is a certain reserve apparent in the allusions made to future things as revealed by the Spirit of inspiration. The language used is general, and to some extent vague, while the prophetic utterance is evidently made, at all, only with reference to the general purpose in view in the passage where it occurs. The mention made by Paul of the "mystery of iniquity" and the "Man of Sin" ; to the coming of the Lord and the resurrection of the dead ; and by Peter to the melting of the elements, the passing away of the heavens, and the new heavens and new earth, may be quoted as examples. It seems clear that all fullness of New Testament prophecy, not only in details, but in general outline, was left to be the subject of that one of these writings in which the whole Book of divine records and revelations should have its consummation and completion. It is further to be noticed that the prophecy in this book is Apocalyptic. Between that which is Apocalyptic and that which is simply prophetic, a distinction is to be made. When we speak of prophecy, we allude to the disclosure of what is future more upon its human side. It is the utterance of the prophet. Apocalypse — the nncovering of that which is hidden — or revelation — is a divine act. The revealing element is in both ; only in the one it is the utterance of the revelation that is chiefly implied ; in the other its communication to the prophet himself. In the book before us, the divine side of prophecy is peculiarly manifest. It is the divine disclosure of divine purpose ; the unsealing of the Book of the divine purpose by a divine hand : '''the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John." The human instrument in its record here, is almost lost in the grandeur of that which he has to disclose. We see him as if rapt away amidst the wonders of the transcendent vision, and even his voice is to us like that of one speaking from behind a veil, or lost in the clouds. VIL WHY WAS IT WRITTEN? Prophecy seems to be, in part, a response to that in man which prompts the desire for a knowledge of the future. This, as is well known, has sometimes led to results highly pernicious in their nature, offering opportunity for those who trade upon the credulity of mankind, and inducing the resort to means more than questionable for penetrating the veil that hangs between the future and the present. In itself, no doubt, the tendency is a right one, fdr the very reason that it belongs so much to the essential nature of man. We are therefore not surprised to find the Spirit of inspiration addressing it in the interest of what most deeply concerns alike the individual and the race. But this, of course, does not explain the whole purpose of Scripture prophecy in B 18 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. general, or of this one now before us in particular. It would further seem to be appropriate to the very nature of a collection of inspired writings, that it should include aecrediti'(l pn.'dictions of future things. Having their ultimate source in that Infinite Mind to which the future is as the present, it might well be presumed that the scope of such writings would partake somewhat of the character of the mind that inspired them, and be accredited as thus inspired by the very fact that they prove their independence of limitations that affect all human productions. Thus the writing, when in the event prediction reaches its fulfillment, becomes its own ample witness, the Author of the Bible revealing himself in his word, as the Author of nature in his works. A moment's further reflection suggests how incomplete and, in a sense, unsatis- factory a book like the Bible would be without this feature. Its subject may, in the most general way, be said to be the Kingdom of God in the world. That kingdom in its own nature embraces for its period the entire history of the human race. It is well nigh inconceivable that the account of it given through inspiration should be limited to any section of this period, or alone specially adapted to the men of that generation to which it is first of all given. It is not enough that it is a history, or a body of doctrine. The very essential purpose of it requires that it should still look forward from the point of view of any one age, however far down the stream of time that age may be, and still have something to disclose, appealing to hope and desire ; something future, to which the people of the covenant may still look as a coming glory or a coming struggle. Having that feature in the measure in which we find it there, the Bible is an inspiration to one age in the same way that it is to another ; its riches of impulse and admonition ^nd encouragement being as exhaustless as its riches of instruction and reproof and present comfort. Consi.stently with this view of Scripture prophecy in general, we think it sufficient to say of the Apocalypse in particular, that it is a foreshowing of the fortunes of the Christian church, viewed as the spiritual Kingdom of God, during the ages of its militant state ; to which is superadded a prophetic glimpse of that final triumphant and perfect state which comes in the restoration of all things. Its purpose must be to forewarn upon the one hand, to inspirit and sustain with courage upon the other. These ends it has served efficiently, during the centuries of the Christian Dispensation thus far, and these ends it still continues to serve. But to this may be added the fact that scarcely any one of the sacred writings has answered the end alike of intellectual and spiritual iruipimtiou so fully as the Apocalypse ; and this also we must presume to have been con- templated in it. The book is a wonderful one, even for those who deny its prophetic character : a marvelous creation of imaginative genius, even were it this alone. But it has commended itself as more than this to so many superior minds, has supplied such impulse to inquiry, and iiisjjired so much of elevating and quickening study, that it may truly be said, in its intellectual and spiritual influence, to crown and consummate those Scriptures, all of which have been in the world such an element of both spiritual and intellectual power. " To show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass. . . . Blessed," indeed, " is he that readeth and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein : for the time is at hand." VI. THE PAROUSIA. If any one theme can be nanu-d as the absorbing and comprehensive one in this book, it must be given to us in the words (1 : 7), "Behold, he comoth with clouds." INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 19 With this announcement the book opens. With the Lord's own declaration, "Behold; I come quickly " (22 : 7), and the response of his servant, "Even so, come, Lord Jesus," the book closes. The Dispensation whose events and issues the book in the main prophetically traces, so far from being a final one, is but preparatory to that which is final. Of this fact, indications appear everywhere in the book itself, down to its closing chapters. The scene presented is not that of a final condition, settled and permanent, but a broken and changeful one ; a theatre upon which warring forces meet, a vast stage of human history crowded with actors and issues, while in some of the changes of the tremendous drama, heaven itself seems in suspense as to what the final act shall be. The souls of martyred ones under the altar, through many centuries of ordeal, are crying, ' ' How long ! Lord ? ' ' while it is only in the finishing of ' ' the mystery of God ' ' that any final answer is given. All this indicates a continual looking forward; the attitude is one of expectation; only as this consummation is reached is the key to the m^'steries of divine providence at last found. And that consummation reaches its climax in the personal coming of the Lord. Now, the crucial point in the interpretation of this book is, for these reasons, that which concerns this second personal advent, more especially in its relation to that peculiar and significant feature of the whole prophecy — the millennium. This is not the place to set forth the reasons which influence us in placing this personal second advent after the millennium, rather than before. It must suffice, here, to simply announce the fact that our convictions, after careful study of the prophecy, compel this conclusion. The grounds upon which these convictions rest will appear in the proper place. For the present, we simply declare our acquiescence in that view of this second coming of our Lord which makes it the great event of the future ; which regards it as bearing a rela- tion to all that is now passing, and is yet to come in the present Dispensation, no less vital than the first advent bore to the four thousand years of human history that pre- ceded it ; and which claims that only as this event is set in its true relations, can this consummating Book of the New Testament be adequately understood or explained. IX. GENERAL ANALYSIS. A phrase rich in significance occurs at ch. 10 : 7, in this book — "the mystery of God:" — "In the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound, then is finished the mystery of God, according to the good tidings which he declared to his servants, the prophets" {Revised Version). This "mystery of God" may, in general, be said to be the subject of the book. One finds in it, indeed, when carefully studied, what seems like a gathering up, in brief and sublime summary, of the whole of that inspired prophecy, the details of which we find sown all through the earlier books of Scripture. It is a panoramic exhibition of the divine procedure in dealing with the church and the world. It is human history at the point of view of the Kingdom of God in its origin^ its ordeal, its progress., its con.snmma.tion. Of course, a group of visions and allegories cannot be subjected to processes of logical analysis as other writings may. It is only after much study of such that the adjusting principle begins to disclose itself, and only after the details have been in some degree understood, that the general system in which these appear in orderly arrange- ment is even suspected. If we proceed to state, here, our own impressions as to the adjusting principle and the general system of the Apocalypse, as it appears to us after much study of it, verse by verse and chapter by chapter, we keep in mind the fact that 20 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. very many such have been already proposed ; and that if others have failed to grasp the idea of this difficult writing, so also may we. Assuming that what we term the adjusting principle in this remarkable series of visions and allegories is as we have stated — a comprehensive disclosure under pro- phetic forms, of that " mystery of God" which is the substance of " the good tidings " declared ''to his servants the prophets "—we find the subject of the book falling naturally into four general divisions. I. The first is the origin, or hcgiiming, of that Kingdom of God which is the central and regulating fact in the annals of our race. This is given to us, consistently with the general character of the book, under the forms of symbol and allegory. That in the history of this spiritual Kingdom of God which antedates Christianity is brought to' view in the theophany that forms the subject of the fourth chapter. The King is there seen enthroned. The encircling Elders, on their four and twenty subordinate thrones, represent at once that ancient divine order which anticipated and foreshadowed the gospel, and the later and consummating one seen in the Church of the Lord Jesus. The four living creatures — symbols of the sentient creation — represent, in the vision, the fact that this Kingdom of God comprehends all being, while in those acts of adoration ahd worship in which they join with the elders, they recognize the supremacy of the enthroned One, and the universality of his reign. In the midst of these stands the Lxmb, "as it had been slain," receiving the sealed book, and alone, in all the universe, found worthy to "open the book and loose the seals thereof" ; symbolizing the central place filled in all history, sacred and secular, by the fact of redemption, and also the truth that the key to all history is the incarnation, the death, the resurrection, and the ascension of the Son of God. We shall have frequent occasion to observe how in all the succession of visions, the many and striking changes of scene throughout the Apoca- lyptic drama, these several features of the theophany remain as fixed elements. He "that sitteth upon the throne," the Lamb, the elders, and the living creatures, from time to time re-appear, as if to remind us how this fact of the Kingdom of God — the reign in righteousness of the Righteous King — is to be everywhere kept in view. In so far as the origin of this Kingdom concerns Christianity, it is brought to view at three points in the succession of the visions : (1) In the opening of the first seal (ch. 6:1,2); (2) in the sounding of the first trumpet (ch. 8:7); (3) in the appearance of the woman, "clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars" (ch. 12 : 1, 2). In the first of these, the Kingdom of God, or Christianity, is seen in its opening, triumphant era ; in the second, those providences are indicatcil wliich signalized that era, more especially in the dispersion of the Jewish nation, the destruction of their city, and the passing away of the former Dispensation ; in the third, we have presented the incarnation, the birth of the man-child, in whom, as "ruling the nations," the might and the dominion under this new order should centre, and by hiiii in subsequent history be exercised. n. Next is the ordml Like everything else in this world, the Kingdom of God must liav(! its ordeal, and demonstrate its right of recognition in all that it claims to be. The ordeal, in this case, embraces centuries, and is fierce and testing beyond all previous example. The experiences of ancient Israel in Egypt and in the wilderness were but a shadow of those which were to be the lot of the anti-typical Israel, the church of the liord Jesus, in the centuries of its own hot ordeal. This ordeal is set forth in throe ways : (1) Under the second, third, fourth, and fifth seals, the special features being the out- break of I'agan hostility (the second seal, ch. 6 : 4), the mischiefs of the Antichristian INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 21 Apostasy (third seal, C : 5), and persecution in its Pagan form (fourth and fifth seals, 6 : 7-10) ; the whole ending in the fall of Paganism, and its burial under the ruins of the Roman Empire itself (sixth seal, 6 : 12-17). (2) Under the trumpets, which bring to view events occurring upon a wide theatre, and exhibiting the Kingdom of God in respect to what is more exterior, and concerned more with its general fortunes : the first trumpet exhibiting under striking imagery the providential events which signalized the beginning of this long history (ch. 8:7); the second trumpet, the fall of the Roman Empire, with its consequences as affecting the national life of Christendom (ch. 8 : 8, 9) ; the third and fourth, those effects of the Apostasj^ which were seen in the general condition of nominal Christendom, especially in the failure of Christian knowledge, and the preva- lence of false teaching, with its consequent ignorance and superstition (ch. 8 : 10-12); the fifth, the opening of the abyss and the issuing forth of Satanic influence and agency, filling Christendom with violence, crime, and misery — the terrible centuries of the Dark Ages (ch. 9 : 1-12) ; and the sixth, the prevalence of desolating wars, more especially the assault upon apostolic Christendom by the Saracens. (3) Antichrist in his mani- festation as the wild beast out of the sea, or the hostile world-power, imperial and other, in all ages (ch. 13 : I-IO) ; and the wild beast out of the earth, corrupt and oppressive ecclesiasticism (ch. 13 : 11-18), known also as the false prophet — false teaching in religion and the various forms of infidelity, having, more or less, their root in such teachings, or taking occasion from it to "deceive the nations." In all these forms the ordeal is exhibited under imagery intense and vivid to the last degree. The tenth and eleventh chapters are interposed with a view to show how in the midst of all God preserves to himself a " remnant," a "church in the wilderness," a seed for the harvest of a better era. A like truth is symbolized in the sealing of the servants of God. III. This better era appears to be signalized by the appearance of the strong angel coming down out of heaven, clothed with a cloud, a rainbow upon his head, his face shining as the sun, and his feet as pillars of fire (ch. 10 : 1, 2). He holds in his hand a little book, open, the symbol of a restored gospel and of a rapidly approaching consum- mation. He announces the speedy sounding of the seventh trumpet, and the finishing of the mystery of God — the fulfillment of prophecy and promise in respect to ultimate victories of the Kingdom of God. Like things are signalized by the resurrection of the slain witnesses (ch. 11 : 11-13), and their ascension into heaven; also by the angel flying in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach to the whole world (ch. 14: 6-7), by the proclamation of the fall of Babylon, and by the choruses of heavenly praise (ch. 11-15-18; 15: 3, 4). IV. The fourth general division is that of the consummation. It is heralded by the outpouring of the vials, with "the seven last plagues" ; by the fall of Babj'lon, or the Papal Antichrist ; the Beast, or Antichrist in its manifestation as a hostile world- power ; and the False Prophet, or falsehood and deception, misleading and ruining the souls of men. Then comes the binding of the Dragon, or Satan (eh.- 20 : 1-3), the full establishment of the Kingdom during the millennial period (ch. 20 : 4) ; to be followed, at the end of the thousand years, by the ultimate victory over Satan and his host, the coming of the Son of man, the great wnite throne, the general resurrection, the final judgment, the new heavens and the new earth. We offer this as what seems to us an analysis of the contents of this difficult book, which may afford some general idea of the arrangement into which, upon careful study, its several parts appear to fall. 22 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. X. ANALYSIS OF CONTENTS BY CHAPTERS. CHAPTER I. Ver. 1-3. The Prologue. Ver. 4-8. The Salutation. Ver. 9-20. The Vision of the Lord. CHAPTER II. EPISTLES TO THE CHURCHES. 1. To the Church in Ephesns. Ver. 1. Inscription. Ver. 2, 3. Commendation. Ver. 4-6. Reproof and Admonition. Ver. 7. Promise and Encouragement. 2. To the Chtirch in Smyrna. Ver. 8. Inscription. Ver. 9, 10. Commendation and Assurance. Ver. 11. Promise. 3. To the Church in Pergamos. Ver. 12. Inscription. Ver. 13. Commendation. Ver. 14-16. Reproof and Warning. Ver. 17. Promise. 4. To the Church in Thyatira. Ver. 18. Inscription. Ver. 19. Commendation. Ver. 20-23. Reproof and Threatening. Ver. 24-29. Promise. CHAPTER III. EPISTLES TO THE CHURCHES (CONTINUED). 5. To the Church in Sardis. Ver. 1. In.scription. Ver. 1-3. Admonition. Ver. 4-6. Promise. 6. To the Church in Philadelphia. Ver. 7. Inscription. Ver. 8-13. Commendation and Promise. 7. To the Church in Laodicea. Ver. 14. In.scription. Ver. ]r>-][). Admonition. Ver. 20-22. Promise. INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 23 CHAPTER IV. THE THEOPHANY. Ver. 1-3. The Vision of God. Ver. 4. The Four and Twenty Elders — Representing the Kingdom of God as (1) Judaic ; (2) Christian. Ver. 5. The Throne and the Lamps of Fire. Ver. 6-8. The Crystal Sea and the Four Living Creatures — Representing (1) Righteousness and Purity of the Divine Government ; (2) its Comprehension of the Sentient Creation. Ver. 8-11. Worship of the Creatures and the Redeemed. CHAPTER V. THE SEALED BOOK. Ver. 1-4. The Book— Who is Worthy to Open It ? Ver. 5-7. The Lamb in the Midst of the Throne. Ver. 8-10. The New Song. Ver. 11-14. The Angelic Response and the Chorus of Creation. CHAPTER VI. OPENING OP THE SEALS. Ver. 1-8. The First Four Seals. (1) The White Horse and its Rider — Opening Era of Christianity. (2) The Red Horse and Rider — Outbreak of Opposition and Violence. (3) The Black Horse and Rider— Famine of the Word. (4) The Pale Horse and Rider — Persecution. Ver. 9-11. The Fifth Seal— The Souls Under the Altar; Delay of Providential Vindication Symbolized. Ver. 12-17. The Sixth Seal — ^The Great Earthquake; National Convulsion, with Dismay of Rulers and People. CHAPTER VII. SEALING OF THE SERVANTS OF GOD. Ver. 1. The Angels of the Winds. — Symbols of God's Restraining Providence. '■ Ver. 2, 3. Another Angel, Having the Seal of the Living God. The Sealing a Sign of Preservation Amidst the Ordeal. Ver. 4-8. The Number of the Sealed. Ver. 9-17. The Great Multitude and their Chorus of Praise. CHAPTER VIII. THE SEVENTH SEAL AND THE FIRST POUR TRUMPETS. Ver. 1. Opening of the Seventh Seal. Ver. 2-6. The Trumpet Angels — Fire from the Altar of Incense Cast into the Earth. Ver. 7. The First Trumpet Sounds — Hail and Fire Mingled with Blood ; Providential Portents at the Opening of the Christian Dispensation. Ver. 8, 9. The Second Trumpet Sounds — A Burning Mountain Cast into the Sea; Overthrow of Pagan Imperialism. Ver. 10, 11. The Third Trumpet Sounds— The Falling Star ; Christian Apostasy. 24 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. Ver. 12. The Fourth Trumpet Sounds — The Sun and Stars Darkened ; Results of the Apostasy in False Teaching and Hierarchical Usurpation. Ver. 13. The Three Woe-Trumpets Announced. CHAPTER IX. TirE FIFTH AND SIXTH TRUMPETS. Ver. 1-12. The Fifth Trumpet Sounds— The Angel of the Pit, Satan; Locusts Out of the Pit — Satanic Influence and Agencj'. Ver. 13-21. The Sixth Trumpet Sounds — The Four Euphrates Angels Loosed; Armies of Horsemen, Destructive Wars in Punishment of Apostasy. CHAPTER X. THE STRONG ANGEL AND THE LITTLE BOOK. Ver. 1-7. The Angel — Angel of the Covenant. Ver. 8-11. The Little Book. A Recovered Grospel, Prophecy of the Consummation. CHAPTER XI. THE TWO WITNESSES AND THE SEVENTH TRUMPET. Ver. 1, 2. Measurement of the Temple — ^The True Church, Separate and Safe. Ver. 3-13. The Two Witnesses — Adequate Christian Testimony in Time of Per- secution. Ver. 14-19. The Seventh Trumpet Sounds— End of the Ordeal- Era of Gospel Progress and Triumph. CHAPTER XII. THE CHURCH IN THE WILDERNESS. The Vision Reverts to ""The Beginning of the Gospel^ Ver. 1-6. The Woman and the Dragon. — The Church as Mother of the Man-child ; Satan as the Dragon, Persecution of the Church. Ver. 7-12. Michael and the Dragon. — War in Heaven ; Symbolizing the Victories of Redemption. Ver. 13-17. The Flight of the Woman— Wilderness State of the True Church. EXCURSUS A— THE FORTY-TWO MONTHS AND THE TWELVE HUNDRED AND SIXTY DAYS. CHAPTER XIII. REVELATION OF ANTICHRIST. Ver. 1-10. The Wild Beast Out of the Sea— Antichrist as a Hostile World-Power. Ver. 11-18. The Wild Beast Out of the Earth— Antichrist as Corrupt and Oppres- sive Ecclesiasticism. EXCURSUS B.— ANTICHRIST CHAPTER XIV. VICTORIES OP REDEMPTION ANTICIPATED. Ver. 1-5. The Lamb on Mount Zion. With Him the Redeemed Multitude. Result of the Pending Conflict Anticipated. INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. 25 Ver. 6-12. Angelic Proclamations. The Gospel Angel Fljang in jMid-Heaven. The " Second Angel ' ' Announcing the Fall of Babylon. The ' ' Third Angel ' ' Proclaiming the Doom of the Adherents of Antichrist. Ver. 13. A Voice from Heaven. The Blessed Dead. Ver. 14-20. The Harvest and the Vintage. CHAPTER XV. THE SEA OF GLASS AND THE SEVEN LASP PLAGUES. Ver. 1-4. The Sea of Glass, the Redeemed Company, and the New Song. Ver. 5-8. The Angels of the Vials — Ministers of Judgment in the World's Last Ages. EXCURSUS C— THE VIALS. CHAPTER XVI. POURING OUT OF THE VIALS. Ver. 1, 2. The Fourth Vial Poured Out into the Earth — God's Judgment upon Corrupt Ecclesiasticism. Ver. 3. The Second Vial Poured Out into the Sea — God's Judgment upon Corrupt and Hostile Nationalities. Ver. 4-7. The Third Vial Poured into the Rivers and Fountains — Corruption of the Sources of Intellectual, Moral, and National Life — Depraved Tendencies and Effects Overruled as Punishment. Ver. 8, 9. The Fourth Vial Poured upon the Sun — Perversions of Revealed Truth through Fanaticism and Infidelity. Ver. 10, 11. The Fifth Vial Poured upon the Seat of the Beast — Visitations upon Antichrist. Ver. 12-16. The Sixth Vial Poured upon the River Euphrates. Hostile Influences Let Loose. Unclean Spirits of Antichristian Malice. Ver. 17-21. The Seventh Vial Poured into the Air — Confusions and Tumults of tke Last Times. EXCURSUS D.— THE BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON. CHAPTER XVII. MYSTICAL BABYLON. Ver. 1-7. The Woman and the Beast — Apostate Christianity Sustained by Aiiti- christian Powers. Ver. 8-18. Angelic Exposition of the Vision. CHAPTER XVIIL Babylon's fall. Ver. 1-3. Angelic Proclamation — Babj'lon's Doom Announced. Ver. 4-8. The Voice from Heaven — " Come out of Her, niy People." Ver. 9, 10. Lament of the Kings. Ver. 11-16. Lament of the Merchants. Ver. 17-19. Lament of the Shipmasters. 25 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVELATION. Ver. 21-24. The Stone Cast into the Sea— "Thus with Violence shall that Great City Babylon be Thrown Down.' ' CHAPTER XIX. THE HEAVENLY TRIUMPH. Ver. 1-4. A Song of DeUverance — Celebrating the Judgment of Babylon. Ver. 5-10. A Heavenly Chorus. All the Servants of God, Angels and Redeemed Spirits, Rejoice in his Righteous Sovereignty. They Welcome the Marriage of the Lamb. Ver. 11-16. The Conquering AVord. Consummating Triumph of the Gospel. Ver. 17-21. Final Doom of Antichrist. CHAPTER XX. MILLENNIUM AND FINAL JUDGMENT. Ver. 1-3. The Binding of the Dragon — Satan and Satanic Agency Omnipotently Restrained. Ver. 4. The Millennial Reign. The Kingdom of God in its Consummation of Power and Blessing. EXCURSUS E.— I. THE FIRST RESURRECTION. II. THE MILLENNIUM. Ver. 7-10. The Loosing of Satan and the Final Overthrow. Ver. 11-15. General Resurrection and Last Judgment. CHAPTER XXI. ALL THINGS NEW. Ver. 1. The New Heaven and New Earth. Ver. 2-4. New Jerusalem. The Tabernacle of God with Men. Ver. 5-8. The Life Eternal and the Second Death. Ver. 9-27. The Holy City Described. CHAPTER XXII. PARADISE RESTORED. Ver. 1, 2. The River and the Tree of Life. Ver. 3-5. Security and Felicity. Ver. 6-20. The Epilogue. Ver. 21. " The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen." EXCUR^rS F.-THE COMING OF THE LORD. THE REVELATION OF ST. JOHN THE DIVINE. CHAPTER I. THE Revelation of Jesus Christ, "which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things whicli *niust shortly come to pass; and "he sent and signided it by his angel unto his servant John : 2 ''Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things 'that he saw. 3 /Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for » the time is at hand. 1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God igave hiju to shew unto his ^servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass: and he sent and signified 2 '■^it by his angel unto his servant John ; who bare wit- ness of the word of God, and of the testimony of 3 Jesus Christ, seen of all things that he saw. Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of the prophecy, and keep the things which are written therein : for the time is at hand. a John 3: 3-2: 8:26; I'i : 49 » ver. :i; oh. 4: 1....C ch. 22: 16.... dl Cor. 1:6; vei-. 9 ; ch. 6 : 9; 12 : 17... .e I John 1 : l..../Liilie 11: 28; ch. 22: 7 g Rom. 13:11; James 5:8; 1 Pet. 4: 7; ch. 22: 10. 1. Or, gave unto Mm, to shew unto his servants the things, etc 2 Gi'. bondservants : and so throughout this book 3 Or, them. Ch. 1 : 1-3. The Prologue. 1. Revelation. The word implies that the book which opens thus is to have a special character. As already pointed out in the Introduction, it implies that the contents of the book are to be more than simply inspired teaching; they are prop hecy, and more even than in the general sense prophetic, for they are apocalyptic. They are an "uncovering" (a7roicaAui/(is) of things hidden. Of Jesus Christ. The form of the expression may im- ply, either that Jesus Christ is the Revealer, or that he is the subject of the Revelation. The words following, Avhich God gave unto him, seem to make it clear that we are to view Jesus Christ as revealing, and as revealed only in a remoter sense of the phrase, if at all. The things here to be made known are given to him of God, and by him so commu- nicated, as to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass. By "servants" must be meant all followers of Christ, and students of his word. Perhaps the term used implies something as to the temper in which those to whom the things herein con- tained shall be effectually disclosed, must be found; not a captiously critical temper, least of all one of hostility to the great aims and methods of Christ's spiritual kingdom; but one in which he is acknowledged as supreme Lord, and in which there shall be loyal and fervent sympathy with him in all that he pur- poses, all that he claims, and all that he does. ^The things revealed must shortly come to pass, because made necessary by the will and purpose of the divine mind; and "shortly," inasmuch as it is the very aim of the book to exhibit, in apocalyptic vision and symbol, the future of the Church of Christ in its relation to worldly history, beginning with the very period itself to which the writer of the book belongs. And he sent and signified it by his angel. An angelus interpres, "inter- preting angel," is supposed by some to be meant. Of this we have more to say further on. — Unto his servant John. He here indi- cates himself by the phrase so often used by his fellow-apostles, "the servant of Jesus Christ ' (tu) SouAu 'I>)(rou XptffToO). 2. Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that [lit. as many things as] he saw. The rendering in the re- vised version gives a true sense, although less literal than the one in brackets, above. Stuart labors quite unnecessarily to .so connect the clauses as to make it appear that the reference thoughout this second verse is to former writ- ngs of this apostle, and thus to find in the words additional proof that the writer of the Apocalypse was the same as the writer of the Fourth Gospel. Alford very justly argues that the words "as many things as he saw," cannot be understood of the contents of the Gospel; for John there expressly says that he wrote only a small part of the things of which he had knowledge, as connected with the life and teachings of the Lord. 3. Blessed is he that readeth. Many expositors take this as an allusion to the cus- tom then necessary, of assigning to a particu- lar person the reading of the Scripture in connection with Christian worship. A very ancient writer on this book, Victorinus, near the end of the third century, makes no mention of such an interpretation, as it would have seemed natural for one to do, living at the time when the custom alluded to waa 27 28 REVELATION. [Ch. L f probably still in use. He takes the word "readeth" in the ordinary sense, as meaning any one who reads. This seems the more probable exposition.— And they that hear. Even the hearing of the message may bring a blessing with it.— And keep those things which are written therein. Plainly show- ing that "how" they "hear," will determine the nature and measure of the blessing.— For the time is at hand. A general intimation that the things made known will be to each reader and hearer of immediate importance; not things to be left apart among the various subjects of Christian study, as concerning only those who may live in some far future age; but as in such a way related, even in point of time, to each Christian student, in whatever age he may live, as to demand of him earnest and heedful attention. GENERAL COMMENTS'. That this book is a "Revelation" does not imply that it is easily, or immediately to be understood. While it is a disclosure of divine purpose with reference to future things, noth- ing is necessarily to be hence inferred as to the nature, or method, or measure of this dis- closure; which may be such, and in the pres- ent case is such, as to ta.x the patient industry of the student, and to require of him that he shall not be in too much haste to "know the times and the seasons," especially. The nature of the divine Sonship is to us inscrutable; only the fact of it is revealed. The Son is known to us alone in his human manifestation as the Son of man, while yet the Son of God. As a man, Jesus had divine knowledge only through the union of his divinity, as the Son, with the Father. To say of anything, therefore, that it is what the Father only knows, is equivalent to saying that it belongs to the sphere of divine knowl- edge, not that of human or angelic knowl- edge. Jesus, we find, is often spoken of, and often speaks of himself as he was in liis human manifestation. As one with the Father, and divine, he had knowledge of these things " which God gave unto him," of himself; as the Mediator, as the man Christ Jesus, his ac....(* John 8: 14: 1 Tim. 6: i:{; oh. 3: 14.... e 1 Cor ; Gal. 2: 20....ftHeb. 9: 14; 1 John 1 : 7. 1 Or ead washed 3 Gr. in. apostle. They are "the word of God" as hav- ing been given by him in the manner stated in ver. 1, as also in the general sense in which this phrase is so often used in the Scriptures ; and they are "the testimony of Jesus Christ," not alone because, receiving this " word" from the Father, he gives it to his "servants," but also for the reason that the truth of it is pledged by the fact that it is thus communi- cated. He is "the faithful and true witness." The divine source of the message is made cer- tain by the fact of his personal activity in its communication, which fact is itself made cer- tain by his personal appearance, as described in subsequent verses of this chapter. We know that in receiving what is here declared, we are receiving no "cunningly devised fables," but the word of the very " Lord from heaven." The post filled by the reader in the Chris- tian churches of primitive times, was no doubt far more important when copies of the Scrip- tures were so much more rare than now, when they are found everywhere, especially in Christian families. Even, however, if some reference to this custom is to be understood in the benediction upon them that read and them that hear the sajnngs of this book, the application of the words should not be so limited as to make them purely an allusion to the custom in question. Their broader sig- nificance is that of a benediction upon those who, at any time, in any way, either them- selves personally should come to know these things "and keep" them, or with like effect- ualness bring them to the knowledge of others. 4-8. The Salutation. 4. John to the Seven Churches which are in Asia. The names of the churches, given below, suflSciently indicate their local- ity. The designation, Asia, is to be understood of what was really only a section of that part of the continent known as Asia Minor. It included the provinces of Phrygia, Mysia, Lydia, Caria, and the islands in the adjacent -^gean Sea. These districts constituted a Roman province, under the jurisdiction of a proconsul, to which the name Asia was given. — Grace be unto you, and peace. The salutation is apostolic, and quite consi.stent with the accepted theory as to the authorship of the book. — From him which [whoj is, and which [who] was, and which [who] is to come. The last part of this clause should not be viewed as implying any allusion to the anticipated second coming of the Lord. Taken with what immediately precedes, it is simply a paraphrase of that venerable Divine Name revealed to JMoses (Exod. 3:i4), and which so sub- limely announces the essential Being of the Eternal God. — And from the seven spirits which are before the [his] throne. This seems to be an anticipatory allusion to what appears in ch. 4: 5, where mention is made of "seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven spirits of God." In that place the symbolism presents the Divine Spirit himself; the "fire" indicating him in those offices of his ministry elsewhere mentioned (Matt. 3:11), and the number "seven," as in so many other places, implying perfec- tion. "With that sublime theophany now in mind, as he salutes his brethren in the apos- tolical benediction, John uses a form of desig- nation for the Third Person in the adorable Trinity, suggested by the vision he is soon to relate. 5. And from Jesus Christ. The Son is named last, and as he is in his form as the Word made flesh, perhaps for the sake of closer connection with the following clauses, in which he is set forth in those characters and offices which make his person so pecu- liarly dear to faith.— The faithful wit- ness — trustworthy — worthy to be believed. The insertion of "wAo is" supplied by the translators, makes the connection more clear. In his Gospel, John had already recorded those words of Jesus (John is: 37): "For this 30 REVELATION. [Ch. I. 6 And hath ■> made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; Ho him be glory aud dominion for ever and ever. Amen. 7 "Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall we him, and Jlhcva/.w/ which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because ot him. Kveu so. Amen. 6 blood; and he made us to he a kingdom, to he priests unto ihis God and Father; to him he the glory and 7 the dominion 2 lor ever and ever. Amen. Behold, he cometh with the clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they who pierced him ; and all the tribes of the earth sliall mourn over him. Even so, Amen. olPei 2-5 9- ch 5- 10; 20: 6.... i. 1 Tim. 6 : 16; Heb. 13:21; IPet. 4: 11; 5: 11.... c Dan. 7 : 13; Miitt. 24: 30; 26:64; Acta 1: 11. d Zech. 12: 10 ; John 19 : :17. 1 Or, God and Ma Father 2 Gr. unto the ages of the ages. Many ancient authorities omit of the ages. cause came I into the world, that I might bear witness unto the truth." We must take the words in our present passage as in a like way broadlj' referring to him in his office as the Redeemer and Teacher of men, and not ah)ne to what is said in verse second of this chapter, of the book before us as in especial, "the testimony of Jesus Christ."— The first- begotten of the dead. Alfordsays: "Death is regarded as the .womb of the earth, from which the resurrection is the birth." The allusion is to our Lord's resurrection, "as the first-fruits of them that slept" (i Covj^2o).— And the prince of the kings of the eSrth. "All these things will I give thee," said the Tempter. From God the Father the Medi- ator received not only all power on earth, but also in heaven.— Unto him that loved us. More correctly, that loveth us, the parti- ciple used {iyaTT^vTi) being in the present tense. — And washed us from our sins in his own blood. The oldest manuscripts — Sinaiticand Alexand. — have, instead of wash (AoUu)), loose from, free {\vu>). If we adopt this reading, the .sense becomes: "and/reerf us from our sins by his own blood." The doc- trinal significance of the pa.ssage is the same, in either case, though the figure employed diflfers. Stuart and Hengstenberg (and appar- ently Ellicott) prefer the reading "washed." Alford and Diisterdieck (in Meyer's Commen- tary) regard the reading "freed" as prefer- able. The principal reason given by the two former is that the imagery in "washed us from our sins" is more in keeping with the Hebrew manner of speech, to which the writer of this book so often conforms?. The words in Ps. 51 : 4, "wash me thoroughly from mine iniquity," are quoted in illustration. After all, it is a question of fact as to the preferable reading in the original Greek. The MSS. authority is certainly on the side of the read- ing, "freed us from our sins," and a critical treatment of the passage would seem to re- quire that this reading be adopted. 6. And hath made us kings, (<7 kingdom, pa^ referred to. There was a special reason in the circumstances of the churches addressed, making the message for them immediately appropriate and needful ; and a general reason in the fact that such individualization serves to illustrate the truth taught and make its presentation more vivid. There may be no sufficient ground for considering these Seven Churches, in their condition as described, typical of certain states of the church in gen- eral. To some extent, however, they may be so treated, at least so far as to make their spiritual state illustrative of that into which individuals and churches, alike, are prone to fall. "The number seven," says Edward Irving {Lectitres on the Revelation), "is em- ployed in this book several times, and always, as we judge, with the same signification, de- noting unity out of diverse things, complete- ness out of diverse particulars; and this pro- perty of expressing completeness, totality, and unity, the number seven deriveth, as I con- ceive, from the only work of God which is finished ; to wit, the work of creation, which was accomplished in seven successive acts, and yet is one complete work." The salutation and benediction addressed to these churches are noticeable both for their re- semblance to and their contrast with the apos- tolic benediction in general. Grace and peace are invoked, as always in these salutations. The Divine Names, however, commonly joined with the invocation, are paraphrased in a manner striking and suggestive. It is 32 REVELATION. [Ch. I true, as Dii-sterdiecfc says, that John is very far from having in view in this place any dog- matic allusion to the doctrine of the Trinity; yet it is equally true, as the same writer also intimates, that here as elsewhere throughout this hook, the Divine Being is conceived in the three-fold manifestation so familiar under the names of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. But it did not suit the fervid state of mind of the writer to simply name these. The august formula — which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty — while it expresses the whole Godhead, as when first given to Israel through Moses in the name Jehovah, at the same time designates the Father in a manner suitable to the opening of a book in which so much of his sovereignty and his grace is to be revealed. The Spirit is conceived under a symbolism suggested by the splendors of that vision of the divine glory which was still so recent and so fresh. Around the Saviour's name John gathers conceptions suggested by all he had personally known of the Suffering One, and all that had now been revealed to him of the glory of the Reigning One. "That loveth us." The form of the phrase in the more correct version should be noticed. The reference is not merely to that love unto death that Jesus showed in suffering for his people ; but that everlasting love which they find in him upon the throne equally as when he hung upon the cross. Whether the version, "washed us from our sins," or the revised version, "loosed us," be preferred, the doctrinal significance of the words is, as we have already said, the same. The allusion is, of course, to that efficacy of the atonement which places pardon and sanc- tification within the reach of every soul, and makes these the actual possession of every believing soul. The word "kingdom" — made us to be a kingdom— should be taken as meaning more than simply that all believers are spiritually united, as if in a vast commonwealth, with Jesus as its king. It means that in their union with Christ they partake of his kingship, and 80 have fulfilled in them that which is said in such remarkable words of him "that over- cometh" in ch. 2: 26, 27: "To him will I give power over the nations; and he shall rule them with a rod of iron." In these and in like words is foreshadowed that progressive and ultimate triumph and reign of Christ him- self, in which his people, by virtue of their union with him, and their participation in all the vicissitudes of the mighty struggle, shall share. But the New Testament Church, as realizing the typical aim of the ancient economy now done away, is both a kingdom and a priest- hood. It is so by reason of the fact that in Christ, the Head of the Church, both offices- king and priest — are united; and also by rea- son of that union with himself into which he brings all his people. His kingship differs from all others in this, that it is exercised, not simply as a dominion over those who are sub- jects of it, but as a dominion through them, so that they fully participate with him in all that it imports. The priesthood, also, is pecu- liar in this, that it is exercised not only /or them, but in and by them. The words of the hymn — My faith would lay her hand On that dear head of thine. While like a penitent I stand, And there confess my sin — have a strict propriety in so far as this — that a Christian believer not only offers prayer for himself and for others, but does this, in the spiritual sense, with his hand upon the slain offering, after the manner of the ancient priest, and so, in a certain way is permitted the privilege and the function of a true priest- hood. In other words, the whole conception exalts both the privilege and the efiicacy of prayer under the New Dispensation. The symbolism in "cometh with cloud-s," and its significance, have already been briefly noticed. While we have in these words, the first mention in this book of the event to which all its revelations look forward, we find it consistent, in its intimations, with what we claim to be the relation of our Lord's second coming to other events, and with the purpose of that coming. It is consistent, also, with allusions to the same event found elsewhere ; as in Matt. 25: 31-46: "When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holj' angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory; and before him shall be gathered all nations; and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats." Such representations can safely be interpreted only as having in view tlie end of all things, as concerns the ex- isting Dispensation of Grace, and must there- Ch. I.] EEVELATIOK 33 9 I John, who also am your brother, and "companion in tribulation, and 'in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called I'atnios, <^for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ. 10 t^I was in the Spirit on «the Lord's day, and heard behind me /a great voice, as of a trumpet, 9 I John, your brother and partaker with you in the tribulation and kingdom and i])atieiice uiiich are in Jesus, was iu the isle that is called Patmos, for the 10 word of God and the testimony of Jesus. 1 was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and I heard behind me oPhil. 1:7; 4: 14; 2 Tlm.l; 8 b Rnm. 8 : 17 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 12 c ver. 2; oh. 6: 9 d Acts 10: 10: 2 Cor. 12: 2; ch. 4 : 2 ; 17: 3; 21: 10 e Johu 2U ; 26: Acts 2U: 7; 1 Cur. 16: 2..../ch. 4 : 1 ; 10: 8. -1 Or, sted/aUness. fore, as will more fully appear hereafter, point to the second advent of the Lord as post- millennial. Vitringa, as quoted by Hengs- tenberg, says: "Nor is it necessary that the words of John be restricted to the last advent of Christ. For Christ is said in Scripture style to come in the clouds of heaven, as often as he displays his glory, and shows himself as present to the church. And there are various gradations of that advent of Christ in which he is seen by his hardened enemies themselves with the greatest anguish and lamentations." 9-20. The Vision of the Lord. 9. I John. One is led to observe the simi- larity in John's method, here, of announcing himself, to that of Daniel (7: 28; 8: l; 9: 2; 10:2). It is, perhaps, not a forced view to regard the expression, with some, as imitated from Daniel. There are many points of resem- blance, in what he communicates, between this prophet of the New Testament and those later prophets of the Old — Daniel, Ezekiel, and Zechariah. That his manner should also resemble theirs is natural. — Your brother, and companion in tribulation. In his Epistles, John addresses those to whom he writes as his "little children." Here he is their "brother." The reason of this differ- ence is not far to seek. He is now more the bearer of a message, than one speaking with apostolical authority. Besides, "tribulation," persecution has come, and the common suffer- ing has imparted to their mutual relationship more of the fraternal character. It is more in keeping with the position of one who suffers with them, to speak of himself as a "brother," than as a father; just as Jesus "is not ashamed to call" them "brethren" with whom and for whom he suffered. — The king- dom and patience of Jesus Christ [or in Jesus]. The "kingdom" of Jesus Christ is that mediatorial kingdom whose beginning, progress, struggle, and triumph are the sub- ject of this book. In the partnerships, hopes, and fruitions of this kingdom, John makes himself the brother of those to whom he writes. "Patience," in this place, is properly "endurance," combining the two ideas of suffering or trial, and steadfastness — the latter idea being the more prominent one. That it is spoken of as "the patience of Jesus Christ," implies the closeness of the relation subsisting between himself and his peojile. It is not only endurance for his sake; but in some sense endurance in which he himself shares; just as where (Matt. 25:45), he makes injury to his own, injury to himself. — Was in the isle that is called Patnios. More literally : "/ became — came and remained — in the isle," etc. The reason, or occasion, of this sojourn in Patmos is not given, further than is implied in the words which follow, for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus Christ [omit Christ, as above]. By this must be understood, in accordance with early Christian testimony, as shown in the General Comments below, a condition of exile on account of his faith, and of his fidelity and eminence as a Christian teacher. 10. I was in the Spirit. A better transla- would be, "I became [iyivoixriv) in the Spirit." The form of the expression implies a condi- tion superinduced by some special cause. "What this was appears from the words, "in the Spirit." The meaning is, a state of spirit- ual ecstasy or exaltation, induced through divine influence, imparted for this purpose. On the Lord's day. The reasons for hold- ing that this can only mean the First Day of the week (icor. 16:2), are noticed below. This is the first occurrence of the i^hrase, anywhere in the New Testament. The manner of its use, here, however, implies that it was a desig- nation of the Christian day of rest and worship already so common as that it could not fail to be understood. — And heard be- hind me a great voice, as of a trumpeto We are not to regard the voice, or the person speaking, as like what men see^n to see or hear in dreams. They were real ; but as belong- ing to that spiritual world which is so wholly removed from the sphere of the senses, they could be present only to one, like John, in 34 REVELATION. [Ch. I. 11 Saving, "I am Alpha and Onicjia, Hhe first and the la-st': and, What thmi secst, wiiti' in a book, and send it unto ihu sevin lIuhtIu's wliich are in Asia; unto Kphfsus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unio Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Wiila- delphia, and unto Laodici-a. \1 And I turned to see the voice tliat spake with me. And being turned, 'i saw seven golden (■au candlesticks one like unto a son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about at the breasts with a golden a ver. 8 6 ver. 17. .c Exod. a5:37; Zech. 4:2; ver. 20 d ch.2: 1 e Ezek. 1 : b....g ch. 15: 6. 1 Gr. lampstands. 5; Dan. 7: 13; 10:16; ch. 14: 14.... /Dun. 10: the Spirit; that is, so delivered from the dominion of sense, and brought into such rehition to the spiritual world, as that spiritual voices could be hoard and spiritual forms seen. 11. I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last. In these words we have another question as to the true reading of the original. The words are not found in the oldest manuscripts, and by the best interpre- ters are regarded as introduced by copyists. This judgment should be followed, and we should read: "And heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet, saying," "What thou seest write in a book, and send. — In this abrupt and startling way, the extraordinary scene about to open is announced. A mes- sage is to be communicated. John is to re- ceive it, and he must give it a form such as tltat it maj' be sent to those for whom it is first of all intended, and may be preserved for fu- ture ages. — Unto the seven churches Avhich are in Asia. The order in which these churches are named has been noticed. Ephe- sus stands first, because, says Hengstenberg, "the seat of John's labors." The order of the list then "proceeds northward to Smyrna and Pergamos. Then from Pergamos, as the most northerly point, it goes in a regular southeasterlj' direction down by Thyatira, Kardis, Philadelphia, to Laodicea, which is almost in the same parallel of south latitude as Ephesus, but considerably ftirther east." 12. Turned to see the voice that spake Avith me. The voice is spoken of in verse 10 as "a great voice, as of a trumpet." The loudness and the trumpet-tone of the voice were in keeping with the august nature of the vision, the majestic sound of it suggesting something extraordinary, even before the per- son addressed had turned to see whence it came. — Spake. If we translate the word more literallj', "was speaking," so that it may ex- press continuous action, we get the incident, as it occurred, mors clearly before the mind. "When the voice is first heard, John turns suddenly, as would be natural, to see who it is that speaks. — Seven golden candlesticks. The word "candlesticks" is misleading. The seven-branched light-holder in the tabernacle and temple, to which the symbolism here refers, was for holding lamps. The better rendering is "lamp-stands." The same sym- bol is used in Zech. 4:2; only with a very notable difference. In Zechariah, a single lamp-stand is seen; here there are seven. This diflerence corresponds to that which is observed in comparing the marked organic unity of the Jewish spiritual and civil econ- omy, and the organic multiplicity of the Christian. The seven distinct light-holders in John's vision represent the individuality and multiplicity of gospel churches. Each, as bearing lights, fulfills that office which the Lord appointed in the words, "Ye are the light of the world." The number seven has no farther reference to the seven churches of Asia just named, than as in their case also, signifying, in accordance with the symbolical force of this number, eoinpleteness. That is to say, these seven light-holders represent all churches in all ages, alike as setting forth their design, their relation to each other and to him who walks in the midst of them, and as all equally addressed in the messages which follow. 13. And in the midst of the seven can- dlesticks one like unto the Son of man. As in the Greek the article is wanting, Stuart prefers to translate "like unto a son of man," that is, one in the form of a man. He does not doubt, however, that he whom John thus sees is the Lord, in his glorified human body, or that the phrase, "Son of man," is taken from the frequent use of the same phrase by our Lord himself in the Gospels. We cannot fol- Ch. I.] REVELATION. 35 14 His head and "his hairs loere white like wool, as white as snow; and 'his eyes tvere as a Hame of fire; 15 ''And his leet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and <^his voice as the sound of many waters. 14 girdle. And his head and his hair were white as white wool, white as snow ; and his eyes were as a 15 flame of fire; and his feet like unto burnished brass, as if it had been refined in a furnace ; and his voice a Dnn. 7:9 6 Dan. 10: 6; cb. 2: 18; 19: 12 c Ezek. 1. 7; Dan. 10: 6; cb. 2 : 18 dKzek. 43: 2; Dan. 10: 6; cb. U: 2; 19: low him in his translation, for these reasons: (1) Winer explains (p. 125), that the omis- sion of the article before the word "Son" does not give the word this general, indefinite sense, since "Son" is made definite by the word "man" (av'^pionov), which follows. The same form occurs at John 5 : 27: "And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is (the) Son of man (on vlbi ovSpajTTou cVtiV)." Also at Eom. 1:4, where the phrase, "the Son of God," is in the Greek simply "Son of God." See also Mark 1:1; 15, 39; Matt. 27: 43. (2) Alford calls atten- tion to the usage in the phrase "the Spirit of God" (nvevna&eov), where a like omission of the article quite frequently occurs. A significant example is that passage (>nttt. 3:i6), where we read, "And lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God (n-veO/iiaeeoC) descending like a dove." (3) New Testament usage, therefore, warrants us in retaining here the usual translation. We may add that we cannot well doubt it to have been the purpose of John, in this place, to indicate distinctly the Lord Jesus Christ, as now glorified, when we consider how much of significance and force the identity of the person speaking lends to what is subsequently said by him in the messages to the churches. — Clothed with a garment doAvn to the foot. The long, flowing garment, or robe, was a mark of royal or priestly dignity. — And girt about the paps [the breast] with a golden girdle. That the girding of the robe is at the breast, instead of the loins, does not appear to be an incident so significant as some (Bengel, De Wette, and others) suppose. Bengel led the way in maintaining that a girdle at the loins indicates activity ; at the breast, repose. Ziillig considers the latter mode of girding a sign of dignity and majesty. Diisterdieck quotes Jo- sephus (Antiq. III. 7, 2), as authority for the statement that the priests were customarily girded about the chest. 14. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as Avhite as snow. The word for "white" {\evK6v), agrees, in the Greek, with "wool" (eptoi/), and not with "snow" {xiuv). So that the passage should read, ^^ His head and his hair were as white wool, as S)iow." One is reminded, here, of the passage in Daniel (7: 9) : "I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of Days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool ' In the account of the Transfiguration, we read (Luke9:29), " As he prayed, the fashion of his countenance was altered, and his raiment was white and glistering." In the manifestation of himself to John, on the occasion now under consideration, the person of the Lord was in a like manner transfigured and glorified, only 3'^et more resplendently, and with more evident signs of divinity. It should be noticed that both the head and the hair are described as "white, like white wool," showing that we are not to take the description of the hair, like wool, too literally, but as indicating in general the majestic splendor of the whole head and face. It is only the ivhiteness of the wool which is intended in the expression. — In a like way we must take the words which fol- low, and his eyes were as a flame of fire. This can mean only that gleaming brilliancy of the eye, which has so much to do in lending force of expression to the whole face. We are reminded, again, of Daniel (i**-" ): "his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire." 15. And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they [it] burned in a furnace. Much diflSculty has been found in the etymology ot the word (xaAxoAijSa.'a.) translated "fine brass." Alford claims that "this word has defeated all the ingenuity of the commentators hither- to." " Brass" (xoAkos) "from Lebanon" (At'^ai^o?) might seem the most natural explanation, if mention were anywhere made of fine brass, or brass of any kind, as brought from Leba- non. "If conjecture were admissible," says Alford, "(which it is not), I should, in de- spair of a way out of the difficulty, suggest whether the word may not have been x'^^ko^'- ^aSiui, a stream of melted brass." Stuart and Hengstenberg treat the word as of Hebrew origin, and having the meaning of "fine" or se REVELATION. [Ch. I. If) "And lie had in his right hand seven stars: and »oiit of liis mouth went a sharp two-edged sword; 'and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strengtli. 17 And ■'when I saw him, I Cell at his feet as dead. And v). The latter clause Ch. I.] REVELATION. 87 19 Write "the things which thou has seen, 'and the things which are, ■'aud the things which shall be here- after ; 20 The mystery ''of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, "and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are /the angels of the seven churches: and flthe seven candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven churches. 19 and I have the keys of death and of Hades. Write therefore tlie things which thou sawest, and the things whicli are, and the things which shall come 20 to pass hereafter; the mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest lin my right hand, and the seven golden 2 candlesticks. The seven slurs are the angels of the seven churches: and the seven -candlesticks are the seven churches. over. 12, etc ftch. 2: 1, etc c ch. 4 : l.etc. r. In e ver. 12.... /Mai. 2:7; ch. 2: 1, etc g Zech. 4: -1 Gr. upon 2 Gr. lampstands. ^ Matt. 5: 13; thus explains the first. If we ask, in what sense is Christ "the first and the hist," the answer is that he is such as being "the Living One"; the Being who has life in himself, "who only hath immortality," the fir.st and the last. It is quite in the manner of those assertions of his own eternal being which Jehovah makes in so many places in the Old Testament. (See Isa. 43: 10-18; 44: 6; 48: 12). It is therefore the attribution to himself of that eternitjr of being (equivalent to "I am Alpha and Omega") which belongs to God alone. — And was dead. The Living One that died; having assumed, in connection with the divinity, a nature capable of death, and in this nature having actually suffered death.— And behold I am alive forever- more. Amen. A glorious fact, now asserted with solemn asseveration, and which warrants the joyful confidence of the trusting soul. "My Redeemer Hveth!" — And have the keys of hell and of death — of death and the world of the dead; not Gehenna, but Hades. This imagery of the gate and its "keys" was natural in a country and a time when walled cities were so common. It may be taken as a symbol of that concentration of power, of which the strong, walled city was itself representative. Hence the personi- fication of Death as some inexorable poten- tate, and the world of the dead as ruled by him, the dread tyrant. "I am he," says the glorified Redeemer, "that hath the 'keys' of that strong city; a power greater than that of him who seems so invincible, so that he rules onlj'' by sufferance." 19. Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter. More fully rendered, write therefore the things, etc. Says Grotius, '^quia me tarn potentem vides'^ ; Because of what you see of my power and present glory, therefore write. John could not doubt of his commission, in this regard, with such a vision before him. Three classes of things to write appear to be indicated. Between the first and the second the distinc- tion at first does not seem so clear. It might appear as if "the things which thou sawest" (Rev. Version), and "the things which are" must be the very same things, since the vision is still a present one. In view of this difl[i- culty, some writers prefer to take the words "which are" (& elalv), as better rendered, "what they (the things seen) mean." Per- haps, however, we may regard the second and third clauses as in some sort epexegetical of the first; in that case, the clause, "things which thou hast seen," will comprehend the two classes, "things which are," and "things which shall be hereafter" ; the former being the messages k) the churches soon to be given, with all that appears in that connection; the latter subsequent visions and revelations, as given in later portions of the book. 20. The mystery of the seven stars . . « and the seven golden candlesticks. By "mystery" (iJ.vaTripi.ov), alike in New Testa- ment and in classic usage, is to be under- stood, not that which is incomprehensible, but simply that which has not as yet been so revealed or expounded as to be actually com- prehended or known. In this sense the word was used in speaking of "the Eleusinian Mysteries." Thus, the seven stars and the seven golden candlesticks have here a hidden meaning, which must be explained, or re- vealed, before it can be known. The general significance, however, is given already in the words which follow. — The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven candlesticks . . . are the seven churches. The full significance of what these imply is left to appear more full}^ in what is said later. The words simply present the general sense of the symbol. By "angels of the churches," we understand, for reasons given in connection with the exposition in the next chapter, the chief otficer in each of these churches. 38 KEVELATION. [Ch. I. GKNKRAL COMMENTS. It is, perhaps, unnecessary to go at large into the question which has been somewhat discussed, whetiier John simply visited Pat- mos for the purpose of writing the Apoca- lypse, or whether, as has been the almost universal tradition and belief, he was sent thither by the pei'secuting pagan authorities. The first view, held by a few commentators that follow De Wette, is based upon a mean- ing given to the words in verse 9: "for the word of God, and the testimony of Jesus Christ," and more especially upon the as- sumed force of the preposition, by them trans- lated "for the sake of" (Sta). An equally correct translation is ''^because of, ^' or, ''''incon- sequence ofy The former rendering would implj' that the reason of the apostle's stay in Patmos was that he might there receive and record the visions here contained; the latter, that it was on account of "the testimony of Jesus Christ," which he had borne, and "the word of God," which he had preached — on account of his fidelity in this ministry — that his abode had come to be in the desolate island named. While this latter interpreta- tion seems the more consistent and probable, it is borne out by the testimony of those whose witness, in a case like this, should be conclusive. For example, Origen, explaining that passage in Matthew, wliere our Lord inquires of the two sons of Zebedee, John and James: "Are ye able to drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?" mentions, as illustrating the significance of these words, the murder of James by Herod, and the ban- ishment of John to Patmos "by the king of the Romans," meaning, of course, one of the emjierors — though which emperor, he does not say. Victorinus, who suffered martyrdom under Diocletian, in a. d. 303, and who was the first of all who have written commen- taries upon the Apocalypse, says in substance the same thing, adding, however, that the apostle was condemned to work in the mines, in addition to the sentence of exile. There is really no reason to call in question what has been almost frr)m the date of the book itself, the constant testimony of Christian history as to the banishment of John to Patmos, as we have shown elsewhere, by Domitiaii; while, as Stuart makes clear, the construction of the passage in question so as to show that it must be taken in this sense, is alone consistent with the usage of the New Testament Greek in like cases. The testimony as to the early observance of the first day of the week as the Christian day of rest and worship, and of its designation as "the Lord's Day," is conclusive. Two pas- sages in the New Testament may be cited. Acts 20: 7: "And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break breatV ; and 1 Cor. 16: 2: "Upon the first day of the week, let every one of you lay by him in store," etc. The natural and consistent, almost the necessary interpreta- tion of these passages is that already, in the apostolic period, and probably from the very date of the formal institution of the church with its observances, "the first day of the week" — the day of our Lord's resurrection — was recognized as that which should be ob- served as the day of Christian rest and worship; when the disciples should come "together to break bread," when they should prepare or make their gifts for the Lord's cause, and when other things t;hould be done as acts of Christian devotion and service. Quite consistently with this, we find Christian writers, at a very early date, speaking of the day as being such as we describe. In the epistle of Ignatius, to the Magnesians, dated about A. D. 101 — only a few years after the date of the Apocalypse itself — the first day of the week is mentioned as the Lord's Day, while Christians are characterized as "no longer observing the Sabbath; but living in the observance of the Lord's Day, on which also our life has sprung up again by him and by his death." Like things are said by Clemens Alexandrinus, Justin Martyr, Ire- nieus, Epiphanius, Eusebius, and others. Stuart quotes, in a foot-note, a highly im- portant passage from Eusebius' Commentary upon the Ninety-second Psalm : "The Word, (Christ), by the new covenant, translated and transferred the feast of the Sabbath to the morning light, and gave us the symbol of true rest, viz., the saving LoriV s Day, the first (day) of the light, in which the Saviour .... ob- tained the victory over death, etc. . . On this day, which is the first [day] of the light and of the true Sun, we assemble, after an interval of six days, and celebrate holy and s])iritual Sabbath . . . All things whatever that it was Ch. II.] REVELATION. 89 CHAPTER II. UNTO the angel of the church of Ephesus write ; These things saith "he that holdoth the seven stars in his right liand, *who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks ; To the angel of the church in Ephesus write ; 1 These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, he that walketh in the midst of the och.l; 16, 20.... 6 ch. 1: 13. our duty to do on the Sabbath, these we have transferred to the Lord's Day." With such, and other testimony, so often adduced, as to the authorized nature of this change from the seventh to the first day of the week, there ought not to remain any doubt upon the subject. That construction of the phrase, 'Lord's Day," which makes it mean simply the Gospel Dispensation, "the day of salva- tion," as is done by a few ancient commenta- tors, or as by some modern ones, so as to make the verse read: "I was transported by the Spirit (or in spirit) into the daj' of the Lord's coming," is in each case so forced and un- natural as to stand self-condemned. Rich as the Bible is in vision, symbol, and allegorj', it is perhaps impossible to name any passage which in suggestiveness, alike sublime and tender, surpasses, or even equals, this in which Jesus in glory appears to John in the desolation of his exile. When we consider the relation in which these two had stood during the Lord's earthly life, the peculiarly tender tie by which the Master and his dis- ciple whom he loved had been united^the recollection of which must have been the very most precious of those memories which John had cherished during the long years of his ministry since — we readily enter into the emotion with which he recognized the familiar form and feature, even amidst the overwhelm- ing splendor of the manifestation. His human nature could not bear the sight ; and still the humanity there, even amidst the overcoming sublimity of the divine, made the vision to him what those which Lsaiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel saw, could not be to them. The hand that touched him, the voice that spoke to him, were the hand and voice of all in the uni- verse most dear and most entirely trusted. It was the "Son of man," although "the Lord from heaven." It- is, too, a revelation, to the disciple in each age, of him who walks amid the golden candlesticks, and who never ceases to enjoin: "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." Thus "glorious in holiness, fearful in praises," is Zion's king. Yet the hand that holds the seven stars, is the hand that the nail pierced ; and the brow that shines with such awful splendor is the brow on which sat the tortur- ing crown of thorns. CHAPS. IL, III.— EPISTLES TO THE CHURCHES. Ch. 11 : 1-7. To THf Church in Ephesu.s. 1. Inscription. The angel of the church of Ephesus. We leave for the General Com- ments more particular notice of the title, "angel of the church," contenting ourselves here with indicating briefly the interpretation we prefer. The reasons upon the whole are strongest in favor of that view which regards the term migcL in this place as the title given to the chief officer in the church ; and to him as representing the church. There were rea- sons why Ephesus should head the list of the churches so addressed. It was the oldest and the chief city in this province of Asia where so many other notable cities also stood, its foundation lying back in pre-historic times. It had been distinguished as the personal residence of the great apostle, Paul, and the scene of his labors during three years of active ministry — the longest performed by him in any one place. Here, also, the apostle John, himself, by all accounts, had his home and his ministry in the last years of his life, having been sent, it would seem, from this city to the scene of his exile. This may be inferred from the statement of Clement of Alexandria in one place, that "after the death of the tj'rant [Domitian] he returned to Ephesus, from Patmos." The church itself was an important one, and probably held a leading, if not a foremost place among the churches of that region. Fitly, therefore, the messages to the seven churches begin with the church at Ephesus. — He that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand. To Zion God says, by the mouth of Isaiah (*9=i6 ); "Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands," indicating how much she is beloved, and how tenderly cherished. The like imagery here, in the passage considered, must be regarded 40 REVELATION. [Ch. II. 2 "I know thy works, and thy labor, and thy patience, and liow thou caust not bear them which are evil: and 'tlimi liiisl tried them ■'whieh say they are apostles, and arc not, and hiist I'oiind them liars: 3 And luist borne, and hai^t patience, and for my name's sake hast labored, and hast •' not fainted. 2 seven golden i candlesticks : I know thy works, and thy toil and -patience, and that thou canst not bear evil men, and didst try them who call themselves apostles, and they are not, and didst find them false; 3 and thou hast ^patience and didst bear for my name's .1:6; ver. 9, 13, 19; ch.3: 1, 8, 15.... 6 IJobnl: 1 ci Cor. 11 : 13; 2 Pet. 2:l....d Gal. 6:9; Heb. 12:3, 5. 1 Gr. lamp- stands 2 Or, sted/astness. as superadding to this idea, which seems to be in some measure reproduced in John 10; 28, that of tlie supremacy of him who thus holds his servants in his right hand, and that of their function, as performing their ministry for him by his power, and with supreme priety of the words which follow churches themselves. He walks in the midst of them as a constant presence, and so as to be aware of all that concerns their state, and the measure in which they fulfill their mi.-?sion as "the light of the world." Hence the pro- accountability to him. Says Hengstenborg : "Chri-st holds them fast, so that no one can pluck them out of his hand, whether he is minded to protect or to destroy them."— Who walkrth in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks. Here the Lord declares him- self in his relation, not directly as before to the ministry of the churches, but to the 2, 3. Commendation. I know. The epistle to each church opens with this word, "I know" (SiSa). There is in it both encourage- ment and admonition, since alike what is to be commended and what is to be blamed lies ojien to him, with, at the same time, a jierfect knowledge of what is needed to help inliruiity, to correct evil, to strengthen faith, or1o stim- Ch. II.] REVELATION. 41 4 Nevertheless I have xomew/iat against thee, because thou hast lelt thy tirst love. 5 Remeaiber therelore troui whence thou art fallen, aud repent, and du the first works; "or else 1 will conic unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candle- stick out of his place, except thou repent. 6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of ^the Nicolaitaus, which I also hate. 4 sake, and hast not grown weary. But I have /his against thee, that thou didst leave thy first love. 5 Keiiiember therefore Iroui wheuce thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I conic to thee, and will move thy i candlestick out of its place, 6 except thou repent. JBut this thou hast, that thou a Halt. 21 : 41, 4S....b ver. 15. 1 Gr. lampstand. ulate zeal. — Thy works, and thy labor [thy toil], and thy patience. "Works" epya), and "labor" (kojtoi'), do not mean the same thing. The former is more a generic term, covering all the deeds of the life, good and bad ; by the latter is meant labor in the sense of service, especially that which harasses and wearies; that which tries the "patience" (uTTojiofTj). The Greek of this last word comes from two words which signify "fo abide under," suggesting that steadfastness which bears up under burdens, whether these be burdens of service or burdens of suffering. — And how thou canst not bear them which are evil. The special force of this commendation seems to be indicated in the sixth verse, below, where it is said, in praise of the Ephesian Church, that it hates the deeds of the Nicolaitanes," which I also hate." This was a ground of commendation, as showing that these Ephesian Cliristians were so of one mind with the Lord that what displeased him displeased them and was intolerable to them. — And thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not. Paul had said to the elders of this church (Acts 20:29): "For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock." This had now come to pass — wolves, however, not in appearance, but in fact. They claimed to be "apostles," and were not. It was to the credit of the Ephesian Church, that their fidelity and their spiritual discernment protected them against imposition of this kind. They tried these pretenders and found them liars. 3. And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name's sake hast labored, and hast not fainted. This repeats the commendation in the previous verse, with the added praise that all this they did " for my name's sake." Better than the service, the harassing toil, the patience, the fidelity, the scrutiny and rejection of the evil, was the motive inspiring all ; that high Christian motive which is at once a stimulus and a sup- port — "for my name's sake." Literally, "for my name" (Sm to bvoiid ijlov). The name repre- sents the person. This is equivalent, there- fore, to saying, "for me hast labored and hast not fainted." 4-G. Keproof. Nevertheless, I have somewhat against thee. This, "I have somewhat against thee," is said also, in sub- stance, as appears below, of the Church in Pergamos and the'Church in Thyatira. The qualifying word "somewhat" is not here in the Greek. Even if it were so, and thus the usual translation justified, it would not war- rant any such inference as that this which the kSaviour finds thus amiss in the Ephesian Church is not of a serious nature. The lan- guage used in the fifth verse, l:)elow, indicates emphatically the contrary of this. We should read: "I have against thee," or, as the re- visers: "I have this against thee." — Because [that] thou hast left thy first love. We do not understand why Stuart should think it necessary to interpret the "love" in this place as meaning "the former benevolent and beneficent course of conduct." That the Ephesians are, in verse fifth, exhorted to "do their first works," is a very inadequate reason for such a sense, inasmuch as "the first works" [ra npuiTa epya.) in that place, so mani- festly include, along with what is outward in act, that which inspires the act from within. Hengstenberg's reference to Jer. 2: 2 — "I remember thee, the kindness of thy youth, the love of thine espousals, when thou wentest after me in the wilderness, in a land that was not sown," as the illustrative passage, is much more to the purpose. Very truly does he also say that it is one of the characteristics of this apostle, "to combine together the love of God, the love of our neighbor, and broth- erly love." There is, plainly', no ground for taking the clause here, "first love," in any other sense than that which has become so common in Christian phraseology — that warm, earnest, active spirit of love to the Saviour so lately found, to all who bear his 42 REVELATION. [Ch. II. 7 « He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith uuto the churches: To hiui that overcouieth will I give 'to cat ol <^the tree of lile, which is iu the midst ot the paradise of Ood. hatest the works of the Nicolaitans, which I also 7 hate. He that iiath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to tlie churches. To him that over- cumeth, to him will 1 give to eat of the tree of life, which IS in the i Faradise of (jod. a Mail. 11; 15; 13:9,43; ver. 11, 17,29; ch. 3 : 6, 13,22; 13 : 9....6 ch. 22 : 2. 14.... c Gen. 2: -1 Or, garden : as iu tSeu. 2 : 8. toO), neither do they have the "my" (/ixou) after "God" (©eoO), translated "my God," which Stuart and Alford supply. The best reading seems to be, "which is in the paradise of God." This, while it recalls the symbolism in Gen. 2: 9, anticipates that which we find in Kev. 22 : 2, where we shall notice the force of it more particularly. It must suifice to say here that, as cast under this figurative form, the promise is equivalent to that which we have in 1 John 2: 25: "And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life" ; as also in the words of our Lord him- self (Joim 6: si): "If any man eat of this bread, he shall live forever." GENERAL COMMENTS. We have judged it best to analyze each of these seven epistles, in the manner shown above, partly for the sake of a more exact method in the exposition, and partly because, thus, alike the resemblances and the difter- ences in the several epistles may be more ap- parent. The communication in each of these seven messages follows a like order; in which we have, first, the title, suggested in the vision as described, by which the august Per- son speaking announces himself; second, an assurance of his omniscient acquaintance with the church addressed, in its spiritual con- dition, and every peculiarity of its faith and life ; third, words of commendation ; fourth (in all save two), words of reproof and ad- monition; fifth, a call to attention, and a promise for "him that overcometh." "\Ve make our analysis in the exposition more general, so as to involve fewer particulars; keeping it, however, in substance the same. The views held as to the angel of the church addressed in each of these cases, are mainly two; that which takes the word "angel" in its usual signification, and that which, found- ing upon the more literal sense of the word yayyeKo<;) "messengcr," "legate," views it as simply a term of official designation. It is claimed that the former of these is consistent with Scripture usage ; as where our Lord himself says, speaking of "the little ones" (Miitt. 18: 10) : "Their angels do alwaj^s behold the face of my Father which is in heaven," and those places in Daniel (lO: 21 ; 12: 1) ; as also in the book we are now studying, where men- tion is made of "the angel of the waters" (16:5). No one of these cases, however, seems to be analogous to the present one. There 44 REVELATION. [Ch. II. are sJ;rong objections, besides, to this view. (1) No consistent reason can be given why through such an angelic medium the churches should be addressed. All else introduced, as connected with these churches, views them as visible (irganizations, as actual, not ideal, and as found in tiieir actual condition. The nat- ural medium of communication with them would be those official persons, the pastors, or chief officers, who represented them. (2) It does not seem congruous and consistent that an angelic being should be addressed as if either entitled to the commendation or liable to tlie blame, even in a representative sense, which are expressed in these messjiges. (3) The whole subject of angelic ministry, as connected either with individuals or with or- ganizations, is obscure, being mentioned in Scripture but rarely, and never more than in the merest intimation. (4) If the angels of the churches be viewed as angels in the usual sense of the word, and the difficulty alluded to (in 2) above be met by regarding them as symbolizing the churches themselves, then the objection arises which Rothe, as quoted by Hengstenberg, urges: "There would tlien be one image or symbol used to express another" — the angel as a symbol of the church, and the star as a symbol of the angel. "Besides, the angels and the churches would stand immediately beside each other, and of both it would be spoken in the same sentence, that they are to be understood under the symbols of the stars and the lamps; yet of the.se two symbolized objects, must one only be a reality, and the other a mere symbol ! " It should be observed, in studying this point, that (1) The "angel of the church" evidently represents the church. For in each case, we find in a subsequent part of the message: "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches;^' so that what is addressed to the angel of the church, is viewed as addressed to the church. (2) That there were official persons in each church who held this representative position. "When Paul (acu20:17) would leave with the Church at Ei)hesus a solemn message, he "sent to Ephesus and called the elders of the church." His address to them reminds us of the form adopted in the passage under con- sideration. It was not to the elders as indi- viduals, plainly, that he was speaking; but to the elders as representative persons. (3) We find Paul writing to Timothy (i Tim 5 : n) : " Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honor, es2Jecially they who labor in the word and doctrine." This shows that there was a distinction among the elders, some of whom were, more than others, de- voted to "labor in the word and doctrine." (4) It is well known, and admitted on all hands, that one of the elders held a position equivalent to that of the modern pastor, bearing then the designation of "overseer" (sTTto-Koiros), or "superintendent," involving the duty and responsibility of watching over the affairs of a single and separate organized body of Christians. It is most consistent with all that appears in this connection, to regard this person as the one intended in the phrase, "angel of the church." His position was itself on.e of peculiar responsibility; so that for what was amiss in the church he would be held to account beyond even those elders who did not "labor in the word and doctrine." In every sense, too, he would represent the church, which would be with special pro- priety addressed through him. The word "angel" would apply to him in its literal force, as "messenger," "legate." A corre- sponding usage in the Old Testament is at Malachi 2:7: "The priest's lips should keep knowledge .... for he is the messenger, [communicating agent (rnalak)] of the Lord of Hosts," to whom resort may be had for counsel and direction. The Hebrew word, here, corresponds to the Greek "messenger" (ayyeAos), and is applied to the priest of the ancient sanctuary, in a representative sense akin to that which we find in the passage now before us. [The question has been raised whether it may be allowed us to admit the po.ssibility that, during the apostle's exile in Patmos he was permitted to receive visits from repre- sentatives of the churches planted ujion the adjacent coast, so near at hand, and between whom and himself there were so many mutual ties. That he should still have on his heart the "care" of these "churches," and that they should be solicitous to know of his welfare, and have his counsel in their affivira, is beyond doubt. Did an occasiimal "messenger" of the church — its pastor, or other chief perscm — visit him? And was the message in each of these cases now con- sidered, supposed to be sent through him? Ch. II.] REVELATION. 45 It is a point which cannot be determined; yet we know of no positive reason why it should be thought impossible.] It is deserving of remark, as Lyra (quoted by Alford) suggests, that in the commenda- tion in verse (5, our Lord "does not say 'hatest' the Nicolaitanes, but the 'deeds' of the Nicolaitanes; because the persons them- selves are to be regarded with charity; their vices only to be hated." The Nicolaitanes are said by Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clemens Alexandrlnus, Epiphanius, and Jerome, to have been persons led away into a false doctrine and vicious practice by " Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch," mentioned in Acts 6: 5, as one of the Seven appointed by the Church at Jerusalem to relieve the apostles themselves in certain secular matters within the body. They speak of him as a teacher of doctrines encouraging immorality, a species of antinomianism, in which the freedom of the gospel was so abused as to be plead in justification of the worst vices. Other ancient writers say that Nicolas was claimed by these depraved persons as their leader with- out authority, and simply with a view to gain proselytes through the influence of his name. In the "Apostolical Constitutions," dating back to the fourth and fifth century, this sect is spoken of as "the Nicolaitanes, falsely so called." The sect is referred to again in ver. 1.5 of this chapter, as existing also at Pergamos, and where, as some think, it is identified with those teaching "the doc- trine of Balaam," referred to in the verse preceding. Associating these passages, and claiming to find a resemblance of etymology and meaning between the names Balaam ("Lord of the People," or "Destroyer of the People," Heb. ) and Nicolas (NtKoAao?, "Conqueror of the People"), these writers would make the names symbolical, as im- plying the destructive nature of the teach- ing condemned. Such a construction seems fanciful and forced, while unnecessary in any consistent exposition of the passage. The more natural view, and, as already intimated, the more strictly historical one, is to re- gard this sect as undoubtedly holding and practicing the depraved and demoralizing doctrines attributed to them, but as most probably having assumed, as endorsing their "deeds," the name of Nicolas, one of the Seven. The evidence that their leader was actually one of the Seven, is by no means conclusive. That they should be spoken of so severely as in this place and below, in ver. 14, 15, is justified by their character, and the tendency, alike of their teaching and their conduct. Such teaching takes away the very foundation of all morality, and wher- ever it has appeared, as more than once it has for substance in subsequent jiistory, it has proved itself pernicious and destructive to the last degree. We cannot wonder that our Lord should say of it, "Which thing I hate." The connection of what is said here with what appears in ver. 2, should be noted, "and how thou canst not bear them which are evil" ; also the allusion to those who claimed to be apostles, and were not. This destructive element is not to be regarded as within the church, but without it. There is no indication that the church gave it even such apparent approval as would have been implied in the fact that members of this sect were allowed to remain in its own body. It was a form of false teaching with which the church was in contact at Ephesus, but with which it had no sympathy. "Now let it be understood," says Edward Irving, "by every Christian church, that the Lord Jesus Christ is walking in the midst of us; in our assemblies is present, and from the meetings of the elders is not absent — whatever is said, heareth ; whatever is done, marketh ; yea, and whatever is thought, discerneth full well : for 'he knoweth what is in man, and he needeth not that any should testify of man.' And thus his unwearied travel in the midst of his church, is well designated hy his feet of brass, of fine brass ; of fine brass which never tarnisheth, but ever shineth, like the pure metal which floweth from the furnace." "And wherefore," he says in another place, "are these lights of the churches [the seven stars] held in the right hand of the Son of man? . . . To show that they are his, and not their own ; that they are borrowed lights, deriving all their power of illumination from him, according to that word, 'This is the true light which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.' " 8-11. To THE Church in Smyrna. 8. Inscription. Smyrna. The modern city of Smyrna is about two and a half miles from the site of the ancient one. It has a popu- 46 REVELATION. [Ch. II. 8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith "the first and the last, which was dead, aud is alive; And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, who ^ was a ch. 1 : 8, 17, 18.- lation of one hundred and eighty thousand or one hundred and ninety thousand, three- fourths of them being nominal Christians, in- cluding Greeit, Roman Catholic, and Protestant churches. The old city is said to date from about 1-jOO b. c, having been then founded by some piratical Greeks. It is on the JEgean Sea, at the bottom of the Hermaean Gulf. — fourteen or fifteen years would have elapsed. What was his age at the time of his death, seems not to be known ; we are only told that he suffered martyrdom "in an extreme age." If we might place his age, then, at one hun- dred, he would be at the date of his conver- sion fourteen years old, and at the time of John's exile and the writing of the Apocalypse, The angel of the church in Smyrna. Was this angel of the church the martyr Poly- carp? It is a question which cannot be conclusively answered. Polycarp suffered martyrdom under Marcus Aurelius, in A. D. 1G8. He had then, as he told the proconsul at his trial, been a Christian "eighty and six" years. This would place his conversion in the year a. d. 82. Between that date and the writing of the Apocalypse, in a. d. 96 or 97, twenty-eight or twentj'-nine. He may, cer- tainly, have lived to an age so great, or even greater, and may have even as a young man, been the chief pastor at Smyrna, and so the "angel" through whom this epistle is ad- dressed. But this theory must build upon the two suppositions we have named, for neither of which is there any direct evidence. It is true that in a. d. 108, when Ignatius visited Smyrna, Polycarp was the castor there. This Ch. II.] REVELATION. 47 9 "I know thy works, aud tribulation, and poverty (but thou art jricli), aud / knuw tlie blxspht'iuy of 'them whicli say tliey are Jews, and are not, ''but are the synagogue of Satau. 10 eFear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: beliold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribula- tion teu days: /be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee wa crown of life. 9 dead, and lived again: I know thy tribulation, and thy poverty (but thou art rich), and the i blasphemy of those who say they are Jews, and they are not, 10 but are a synagogue of Satan. Fear not the things which thou art about to sutfer: behold, the devil is about to cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; -and ye shall have ^itribulation ten days. Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee the aver. 2.... 6 Luke 12 : 21; 1 Tim. 6 : 18: James 2: 5 c Rom. 2: 17, 28, 29; 9. 6....d ch. 3 : 9....e Matt. 10: 22..../MMti. 24: 13.. g James 1 : IJ ; ch. 3 : 11. 1 Or. reviling..,.! tSouie ancient uutliorities read, and may have 3 Gr. a tribulation often days. would be only eleven or twelve years after the writing of the Apocalypse. Tertullian states that Polycarp was placed by John at the head of the Church in Smyrna. Irenaeus implies much the same, while Eusebius expressly states that he was "appointed by the apostles bishop of the Church in Smyrna." It will thus be seen that there is a possibility, per- haps even a probability^, as Hengstenberg thinks, that "the angel of the Church in Smyrna" was indeed the saintly Polycarp, himself a disciple of the apostle John. Noth- ing in the way of exposition, however, can be founded upon a probability so slender. — These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive. Upon these words, as occurring substantially at 1 : 18, we have already commented. In this case, as in each of these messages to the churches, a fitness is seen, in those divine attributes asserted of him who speaks, to the tenor of that which follows. Not only was the Church at Smyrna already suffering on account of its faith and fidelity, but more and deeper suflPer- ing was in store. He who now addresses it has known in his own person what it is to suffer, "even unto death" ; and not only so, but even in that suffering and that death he demonstrated his divine superiority to both, and especially when that life which he laid down, he "took again" by his own power. Such an one is he in whose name these faith- ful ones face the sore "tribulation" present and to come. Surely, they may trust him, even to the end. If we may suppose that the angel of the church in this case was Polycarp himself, the words have all the more of affect- ing appropriateness. 9, 10. COMMEXDATION AXD ASSSURAXCE. I know thy works and tribulation. Critics are not agreed whether the word.s, "thy works," should be retained or omitted. The revisers, as is seen above, omit them. Tisch- endorf, in his first edition of the New Testa- ment text, retains them. They are found in the Sinaitic manuscript; as also in the Sj'riac Version. In his later editions, however, he omits them, in reliance, it would seem, upon the testimony of the Codex Alexandrinus, Codex Bezaj, Codex Porphyrianus, and the Vulgate and Coptic Versions, where they are not found. Hengstenberg, Diisterdieck, and Alford also omit. Stuart retains them. They should, probably, be thrown out, as an inter- polation by some copyist, who inferred, from the fact that they occur in all other of these addresses to the churches, that they should be inserted also here. The omission might be thought required by the tenor of this message to the Church in Smyrna, which is so ex- clusively one of commendation and encour- agement, the warning words, therefore, "I know thy works," being out of place. As will be seen, however, the oldest manuscripts make a like omission in the message to the Church in Pergamos, where severe reproof is found. [With N, B. containing them, I should rather say because it is easier to ac- count for their insertion than for their omis- sion. — A. H.] If they are thrown out, either here or there, as iirobably they ought to be in both places, it must be upon the authority of the manuscripts alone. We should then read, "I know thy tribulation," etc. The "tribu- lation" [exi^iv) spoken of here, as also in 1 : 9, "Your brother and companion in tribula- tion", must be taken as meaning more than tribulation in that general sense which ap- plies to all who have experience of the usual trials of earthly life. The word means tribu- lation of a special sort, such as oppression, persecution, affliction of some peculiar kind, brings. It thus anticipates in some degree what is more expressly intimated below — the imprisonment and death in ver. 10, where the same word again occurs. — And poverty. It is "poverty" in the strict sense, and as a re- sult of the tribulation which this church was suffering, and was yet to suffer. — But thou art rich. In "durable riches and righteous- 48 EEVELATION. [Ch. II. 11 "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit I 11 crown of life. He that hath an ear, let him hear saith auto the churches; He that overcometh shall not what the Spirit saith to the churches. He that over- be hurt of 'the second death. I cometh shall not be hurt of the second death. a ver. 7 ; ob. 13 : 9 5 ch. 20 : 14 ; 21:8. ness"; treasure in heaven. — And I knoAV the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not. There is an Israel after the flesh, and also a true Israel, as Paul was accustomed to teach. The promises made to the fathers were, in their highest sense, for the latter only, though the former have al- ways claimed them. The same distinction is made here. Those who said they were Jews based their claim upon nationality, as if that included all; yet it was blasphemy in them — a dishonor to God, in which the essence of blasphemj^ appears — to assert this exclusive claim to the privileges of the people of God, while at the same time by their wickedness bringing contempt upon the very name they bore. When Polycarp suifered martyrdom, the Jews were especially violent against him, eagerly accusing him before the magistrate and carrying faggots for the fire. — But are the synagogue of Satan. Trench, in "New Testament Synonyms," (P. 1) in com- paring "church " (e/cKArjcrio) and "synagogue" (avvayuiy'ri), tcmis the former the nobler word. In quoting him, Alford points out that the latter is used only once in the New Testament with a Christian application (j!ime«2: 2), where our version translates it "assembly." The expression "synagogue of Satan" shows how degenerate and perverse Judaism had become. — Fear none of those things which thou Shalt suffer. Which thou art about to suffer — art on the point of suffering. The words indicate that the suffering alluded to was near at hand. The nature of the suffering is shown in what follows. — Behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison. The real source of the spirit of persecution is thus pointed out. Kings, and magistrates, and popes, when they become persecutors, are simply instruments of him who is "the ac- cuser of the brethren," a "murderer from the beginning."— That ye may be tried. It seems to be agreed by the best commenta- tors that these words do not allude to the purpose of God in permitting, but the pur- pose of Satan in instigating the persecution. "That ye may be tried" (n-etpaafl^Te) will then mean, "that ye may be tempted." Satan and wicked men were thus confederate in a scheme to crush the Christian religion, by methods of intimidation and violence. The temptation lay in that dread of a violent and painful death which is so natural, and with some so intense. — And ye shall have tribu- lation ten days. The words, "ten days," must not be taken as indicating any exact period of time, but (1) that the persecution shall have a limit, and (2) that the term of it while not very short, shall also not be very long. It is not unusual in Scripture for a definite number to be thus used for an in- definite one. — Be thou faithful unto death. Wemust not read "until death," but "even unto death"; that is, not be turned from fidelity by death itself— And I will give thee a crown of life. Does the word "crown" {(TTeipavov) mean a diadem, such as kings wear, or the garland, given as a prize to victors in the ancient games? It seems more consistent with the idea in the word "overcometh," in ver. 11, to take the word "crown" in the latter sense. The imagery in the overcoming we take to be the same as that employed so often by Paul, when he speaks of the Christian life under the figure of the contest for a prize. This' was the classical Greek usage, as in the case of the oration by Demosthenes upon "the crown." The crowi; of life must be the eternal life itself; as if he had said, "I will give thee a crown, even life." 11. Promise. He that hath an ear, let him hear, etc. — It is unnecessary to com- ment again upon these words as here re- peated. — He that overcometh. As implied above, we take the overcoming to be, not that of conquest, or kingly acquisition ; but such as that of an athlete striving for the prize. — Shall not be hurt of the second death. The double negative in the Greek (6u /urj) has an emphatic force, indicating the absolute certainty of that which is promised. We might translate, "shall certainly not, etc." The second death must be that which fol- lows the death of the body, which is the first death. In ch. 20: 14 of this book, this second death is described as "the lake of fire." Ch. II.] REVELATION. 49 12 And to the angel of the church in Pergauios I 12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamum write; These things saith "he which hath the sharp ' write; sword with two edges; | These things saith he that hath the sharp two- Under this fearful imagery the condition of souls finally lost is represented. The promise here is, that those who in their fidelity do not shrink from even that death which wicked persecutors were about to inflict, under the instigations of Satan, shall have sure deliver- ance from that other more fearful death — the death of the soul. Instead, they shall receive "the crown of life." We are not to under- stand that by such fidelity they procured sal- vation to themselves; but that such fidelity under the name of Pergama, has now a popu- lation of between twenty and thirty thou- sand, of whom about two thousand are nomi- nal Christians. Anciently, the city — which must not be confounded with Pergamos, the citadel of Troy — was noted for three things: its wealth, its literary distinction, and its idol- atry. The art of preparing skiiis for writing was here improved to such an extent, that the name of the city was given to that species of manufacture, which, as •parchment^ this PEEGAMOS. was a testimony to the genuineness of that faith in Christ, through which, as united to him, they became partakers in the salvation he achieved for them and in them. In a later age, the crown of martyrdom was too much regarded as certain to become the crown of life. This was the effect of con- founding the evidence of being in a state of salvation with that state of salvation itself. 12-17. To THE Church in Pergamos. 12. Inscription. Pergamos for Perga- mum, both forms are found). This city, 'product still bears. There was here a li- brary of two hundred thousand volumes, or parchment rolls, carried afterward, by Mark Antony, to Alexandria, in Egypt, as a present to Queen Cleopatra, and centuries later (a. d. 6-42), destroj-ed along with the celebrated Alexandrine Library, by the ca- liph Omar. (So Dr. Schaff states; others claim that the library was destroyed by certain fanatical Christians, in A. d. 391). Pergamos was also noted for the prominence it gave to the worship of the god ^Esculapius. Other deities, however, were in like manner 50 REVELATION. [Ch. IL i:{ » I know thv works, and where thou dwellest, even » where Satan's seat is: and thou lioldest last uiy name, and hast uut denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my laithlul martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. 13 edged sword: I know where thou dwellest, even where Satan's throne is: and thou holdest last my name, and didst not deny my faith, even in the days lof Antipas my witness, my faithful one, who wa« a ver. 2 6 ver. -1 Tbe Greek text here is soniewhut uncertain. ■worshiped; a group of famous temples stand- ing in a grove near the city, dedicated to Jupiter, Minerva, Apollo, Venus, and Bac- chus, as well as another to the favorite deity, vEseulapius.— These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges. In the address to the Church in Smyrna, those characteristics of the manifestation of our Lord in the vision are named, which invite and encourage trust; here those which remind that the Kedeemer is also the Judge. Mention of the two-edged sword occurs again, in ver. 16 below, where it is termed "the sword of my mouth." The allusion is, plainly, to that feature of the vision (i:i6): "and out of his mouth went a sharp, two- edged sword." In commenting upon the words there we referred to the passage in Heb. 4: 12: "The word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword," etc. As already pointed out, the reference must be to the severity of that scru- tiny in which the Lord "tries" those espe- cially, who bear his name and represent him before the world. 13. Commendation. Thy works. Upon grounds identical with those given above, upon ver. 9, these words must be here omitted. [The manuscript evidence for them is weaker than in ver. 9, being, of the prin- cipal uncials, only B, while X» A, C, P, omit them.— A. H.]— I know where thou dwellest, even Avhere Satan's seat is. Various reasons have been assigned for char- acterizing Pergamos as "Satan's seat," or "throne" (esoi'os), as the word might with more exactness be rendered. Some have as- sumed that yEsculapius was worshiped there under the form of a serpent, the symbol of Satan. But it is uncertain whether even the fact was as supposed. Others have found in the words some allusion to the pernicious in- fluence of the famous library, with its pagan literature, its false philosophy, and its en- couragement to idolatry. The more simple and likely interpretation finds in the words, "Satan's seat," an allusion to the persecution which had already found a victim in the faithful Antipas, and to what has already been said in ver. 10, of such persecution as of Satanic instigation. As a city full of idolatry, and already noted for its antichris- tian hatred and violence, Pergamos might in fact well be characterized as a place where Satanic influence, and Satan himself, had an especial dwelling-place. — And thou holdest fast my name. "Dost not swerve front the profession of faith in my name," that is, "in me." The Pergamean Church was not blameless, as the reproof below clearly in- dicates; but there was this reason for com- mendation — that it had not been driven to deny the Lord even b3' the cruel violence with which one of those composing it had been visited. — And hast not denied my faith [didst not deny faith in mc] even in those days [omit "even"] wherein Anti- pas [was] my faithful martyr [better, my martyr, or witness ; the faithful one.'\ There is nothing farther to be said of Antipas than that he had already suftered for his faith, as am'ong the first of those who had thus sealed their fidelity even unto death. Vari- ous fanciful theories have been proposed for identifj'ing him with known historical per- sons. Thus Hengstenberg thinks, "it will not be reckoned too bold if we should hazard the supposition that Timothy was the person here designated Antipas. The two names, 'Fear God' (Ti/uoeeos) and 'Against All' ("AfTt wis) are closely connected with each other. One cannot trul3' fear God without standing forth against the world, which lies in wickedness, and having it also standing against us." Why the faithful martyr should have been called Antipas, rather than by his own proper name, it would be difficult to show. There was a tradition in the early church that Antipas (this being his real name) was the bishop, or pastor, of the Church in Pergamos, and that he suffered martyrdom for his fidelity, after arriving at a great age. There is nothing, however, con- cerning him, which can be depended upon as history; and the place of history, in sound interpretation, can never be taken by con- Ch. II.] REVELATION. 51 14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there theui that hold the doctrine ol' " Balaam, who taught Balak to cast a stuniblinghlock before the chil- dren of Israel, ''to eat things sacriliced unto idols, "and to commit fornication. 15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine ''of the ]Sicolaitans, which thing I hate. 1(5 Repent ; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and •will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. 14 killed among you, where Satan dwelleth. But I have a few things against thee, becau.se thou hast there some that hold the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to ciust a stumblintjblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacriliced to idols, and to com- 1.5 mit fornication. So hast thou also some that hold If) the teaching of the Nicolaitans in like manner. Re- pent therefore; or else I come to thee quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of my a Num. 24:14; 25: 1; 31:16; 2 Pet. 2 : 15 ; Jude 11....6 ver. 20 : Acts 15: 29; ICor. 8:9, 10; 10: 19, 20.... c 1 Cor 6-13 etc d ver 6 e Isii. 11: 4; 2Tliess. 2:8; ch. 1:16; 19: 15, 21. ' ' •••■"■"='• jecture, nor by fanciful theories as to the signification of names. — Who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. This repeats the attribution of the persecuting spirit, with all it instigates, to Satan, and shows, also, in what sense Antipas was a faithful martyr. It is deserving of notice that Jesus terms him "my faithful martyr." 14-16. Keproof and Admonition. I have a few things against thee. The phrase, "a few things," is not to be taken as depreciating the importance of this which is soon to be mentioned in terms of re- proof; but only as suggesting that the things to be blamed were few, in comparison with the things to be approved. Though "few," they were, nevertheless, of vital consequence, as soon appears. — Because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam. — Those who resembled Balaam in their own conduct, and in the practices which they both indulged and encouraged. It is clearly im- plied that these persons were in the Perga- mean Church, and tolerated there. This marks a point of material difference between this church and the Church at Ephe.sus, which, though it had declined in spirituality, still did not allow pernicious errors of this kind in its own body. — Who taught Balak to cast a stumbling-block before the children of Israel. This "counsel of Balaam" is men- tioned at Num. 31 : 16, where we find Moses saying to "the officers of the host," and in allusion to the women of Moab and Midian : "Behold these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord," etc. It is true that Balak's name is not mentioned here; yet as the previous history .shows the two in confed- eracy against Israel, and as the king would be the most natural person to confer with upon a matter of policy like this, the necessary im- plication is that to Balak Balaam gave his iniquitous counsel. What is thus implied in the Scripture narrative, Josephus (Ant. iv., 6, 6), expressly states, viz., that when leaving Balak, after what is narrated in Num. 23 and 24, Balaam gave this advice to Balak and to the princes of Midian. The advice was that the Moabite and Midianite women should be used as instruments to draw the Israelites into idolatrous practices, and into other forms of criminal intercourse ; that thus they might incur the divine anger and be cut off in pun- ishment. — To eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication. That is, to join with these heathen tribes in idol- atrous feasts with the accompanying immoral- ities. There were those at Pergamos, and even in the Pergamean Church, who justi- fied and encouraged like intercourse on the part of Chri.stians with the heathen in that city. 15. So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which things I hate. The words, "which things I hate," are not in either the Sinaitic or the Alexandrine manuscript. Tischendorf, there- fore, omits them. In place of " which I hate" (6 fiio-m), N. A, B, C, and other manuscripts have, "in like manner" (a/noiws). How the change was made in copying is clear from the resemblance in form of the words, and from the fact of the occurrence of the former phrase in a similar connection above. The verse .should read: "So hast thou also in like man- ner them that hold the doctrine (or teaching) of the Nicolaitanes." The "in like manner" here, must refer to ancient Israel, and the sin, as just described, into which it fell. Just as, through the iniquitous confederacy of the false prophet Balaam and the heathen king Balak, Israel was drawn into the sin men- tioned, so in Pergamos there were those, the Nicolaitanes, who encouraged the very same practices. These Nicolaitanes, in the allusion to Balaam, seem to be spoken of generally, while as Nicolaitanes they are mentioned by the name they actually bore. 16. Repent; or else I will come unto. 52 REVELATION. [Ch. II. 17 "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saitli uulo the churches; To hiiii that oveicometh will I give to eat of" the hidden uiauiia, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone 'a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it. mouth. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches. To him that over- cometh, to him will I give of the hidden mauua, and 1 will give him a white stone, and upon the stone a new name written, which no one knoweth but he that receiveth it. over. 7:ll....!>ch. 3: 12; 19: 12. thee quickly, and will fight against them Avith the sword of my mouth. Not against the cluirrli, but "again.st them,''' although it is not to be supposed that the church, if con- tinuing to tolerate so great a wrong in its own body, would escape. The words, "sword of my mouth," make clear the meaning of this symbolical feature of the vision ot the Lord as described in ch. 1 : 16. He will come in a visitation of judgment and punishment. 17. Promise. The hidden manna. The allusion is twofold; to that "bread from heaven" which "Moses gave" — or God through Moses — in the wilderness; and to that preserved portion of the manna which was kept so long after in the Ark of the Cov- enant. — And Avill give him a white stone. We prefer, upon the whole, to regard the allusion here as classic, and not Hebraic, as in the case of the manna. Or rather, it may be treated as both the one and the other; since there is no reason why the practice referred to may not have been general, and among Jews as well as Gentiles. This was the prac- tice, as Alford, following Bengel and Duster- dieck, states it, "of using small stones, in- scribed with writing, for various purposes"; or, as Hengstenberg: "The antiquarian ele- ment that comes here into consideration is simply the fact that in ancient times they were wont to write much on small stones. To the new glorious name," he adds, "corre- sponds the white stone." Dr. Vaughan, late of the Middle Temple in London, says: "I suppose a new, clean, bright stone, unused before, with something cut upon it; a new name, intelligible only to the owner, a secret between him and the giver, a name of honor and of happiness, a promotion and a glory to the bearer, in which none can intermeddle, and of which none can deprive him. I would understand the promise thus simply, and not lose myself in a multitude of conflicting ideas whicli the words, taken singly, might intro- duce." Various ancient customs have been singled out by different writers, as alluded to in the mention of tlie white stone; as the tessera — given to the victor in the Olympic games — a stone on which was inscribed the reward he should receive from his native city; the white and black balls used by the Greeks in pronouncing the acquittal or con- demnation of persons on trial ; the stones in the breastplate of the Jewish high-priest, etc. It is better to take the allusion as a general one, without attempting to fix specific meanings that are no way indicated in the text. — And in [upon] the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it. The "new name" we take to be the name of the person to whom the white stone is given. Of the significance of this whole promise, with its striking and beautiful imagery, we speak below. GENERAL COMMENTS. No reason, quite satisfactory, it would ap- pear, suggests itself why Pergamos .should have had the evil eminence spoken of in the first part of this message, or letter. The mention of it as "Satan's throne," clearly implies that in that whole region it Avas noted as a centre of antichristian influence, manifesting itself in persecution. No par- ticular form of idolatrous worship can have been the cause of this, as Ephesus was quite as much devoted to the worship of Diana, as Pergamos to that of ^sculapius. As a pagan literary centre it may have been the more predisposed to resist Christianity; yet there seems in this fact no especial reason why this resistance should assume a violent form. The fiict named was probably due to sinister j^f^'sonal influence of some kind. Hengstenberg, in arguing for his view that Antipas must be understood as a name for Timothy, with a symbolical meaning in it, observes that "all other names in the Apoc- alyp.se are .symbolical." This is certalnlj^ a mistake. The names of these seven churches are surely not so. The names of Balaam and Balak, occurring almost in the connection, are at least historical names; and it is by no means clear that either of them is used in Ch. II.] REVELATION. 53 18 And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of (iml, "wlio liath his eyes like unto a tlauie of tire, and his feet are like line bniss. 19 ''I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first. 18 And to the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like a tlaiue of tire, and his feet are like unto 19 burnished brass: I know thy works, and thy love and faith and ministry and i patience, and that thy a cb. 1 : 14. 15 h ver. 2. 1 Or, sted/astness. this place in any other than a plain, historical sense. The mention of Antipas, as a person bearing this name, in the traditions of the early church, favors the view that the name must be taken here just as it stands; which is also the safer course, and far more con- sistent with the rules of sound interpretation. In connection with "the hidden manna" and "the white stone," arises a question as to the exact force of the word, "overcometh." Shall it be taken as alluding to the final over- coming of the Christian believer, as he enters heaven? Or does it, at least, include the over- coming of ripening Christian experience in the present life? It is quite clear that the watchfulness and the spiritual struggle en- joined in the admonitions of this message to this church, as also in each of the others, is a present one. Temptation, hindrance, spiri- tual exposure in manj' kinds, are the subject of the warning, and the injunction is that these shall be encountered and overcome. The phrase itself, also, in the Greek properly means, "to him who is conquering," engaged in a conflict not yet ended, though over- coming. There is to be, in each case no doubt, a final overcoming, but also one in the present time. It seems to us that the whole meaning of this rich passage is ade- quately seized only as we view it in appli- cation to the entire course of a Christian's experience from the moment of his conver- sion, on to the consummation of his Christian life in heaven. Thus "the hidden manna" will mean the spiritual sustenance, comfort, inspiration, which a Christian realizes in his progress in divine life, in usefulness, and in meetness for heaven — especially communion with his Saviour, who said of himself, "I am that bread from heaven" — and which reaches its highest perfection in the final saved state. It is "hidden," as being so entirely unknown to the world, and even comprehensible only through experience. In like manner "the white stone" should be viewed as the personal evidence a Christian has, given him in conversion, and intended to be cherished by him all his life after as the testimony and pledge of his acceptance "in the Beloved." The name written there is his own name; that no one knoweth it save himself, alludes to the fact that the personal evidence of a Christian soul is a matter so entirely between that soul and its Saviour, and in its essence so incommunicable to any other. In the final overcoming, "the hidden manna," upon foretastes of which his spir- itual life here has been sustained, becomes the fullness and perfection of heavenlj' good; and "the white stone," that personal assur- ance of faith and hope which has sustained him in many a conflict of temptation and doubt, becomes the complete assurance of fulfilled divine promise and pledge. How tirm a foundation, ye saints of the Lord, Is laid for your faith in his excellent word ! What more can he say than to you he hath said — You who unto Jesus for refuge have tied? 18-28. To THE Church in Thyatira. 18. Inscription. The Son of God. In the vision he is described as "one like unto the Son of man." Here he terms himself "the Son of God." We view him aright, therefore, only as we see in him both these— the God-man. — Who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire. As in the other cases, that feature of the vision (i : lais) is chosen which has an especial fitness to the tenor of the message. 'The symbolism implies that searching and consuming divine observation in which the evil in men is both seen as it is, and requited as it deserves. — And his feet are like fine brass. Diisterdieck says: "The two descriptions, taken from 1: 14, 15, have their meaning in this: that the Lord with his flaming eye perfectly perceives [pier- ces straight through, richtig dui'chdringt] all things, and with his feet like brass tramples down everything unclean and hostile [alles Unreine und Feindselige zo'tritt].'" 19. Commendation. I know thy Avorks, and charity [love], and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works ; and 54 REVELATION. [Ch. II. 20 Xotwithstanding I have a few tilings against tliee, because thou suli'erest that woman "Jezebel, which callelli herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants '■to coinniit foruiciitiou, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. 20 last works are more than the first. But I have this against thee, that thou sutlerest 'the woman Jezebel, who calleth herself a prophetess; and she teacheth and seduceth my servants to commit fornication, a 1 Kings 16: 31; 21: 25; 2 Kiiigj 9 : 7.... 6 Ex.34: 15; Acl« 15 : 20. 29; 1 Cor. 10: 19,20; uncieut, reud thy wife. i\ 14. 1 Many ituttioi'iiics, some the last to be more than the first. As Tisfhendorf finally settle.s the text, the trans- lation should stand: "I know thy works, and love, and faith, and service, and patience; and thy la,st works [to be] more than the first." In the common version the clause, "thy works," is repeated in a way, mainly through a false punctuation, to make the rea- son and force of the repetition altogether ob- scure. Some manuscripts omit the word for "service"; but Tischendorf retains it, placing it, however, after faith, instead of before it. tendant spiritual graces, no doubt — to some extent, at least — had declined. Here they had increased, rather, so that the "last works," the love, faith, service, patience, were "more than the first," more than at the beginning. 20-23. Repkoof and Threatening. Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee. Here, again, the manuscripts ditier; some reading, "I have a few thing.s," some, "I have much," others, simplj', "I have against thee," meaning, "I have this against thee." This is the reading of the THYATIRA. The "works" specified, therefore, stand in groups — love and faith, service and patience. These seem to be the works alluded to, the specifications being epexegetical, or explana- tory, as if the phrase read, "I know thy works, even thy love," etc. "We should read "love" {aya-nriv) instead of "charity," which latter word has acquired a meaning, implied indeed in the Greek one, but by no means properly expressing it. The last part of the verse indicates that the Church in Thyatira wa-; found in a condition contrasted with that at Ejihesus. There the "love," with its at- Alexandrine and Vatican manuscripts, to- gether with C and P, which Tischendorf here follows. — ^Because [thatl thou sulfercst that woman Jezebel. There may be dan- ger of making too much of the fact that the evil noted in the Church at Thyatira is sym- bolized under the name of a woman. There may be no other rea.son for this than that Jezebel, the wife of Ahab, was an iiistrument in leading the ancient Israel into the same evil practices into which, by the instigation of Balaam and Balak, the jH'ople had fallen while on their wilderness journey, so long Ch. II.] REVELATION. 55 21 Aud I gave her space "to rejjeut of her fornica- tion; and she repeutgd not. 22 Behold, I will east her into a bed, and them tliat conmiit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. 21 and to eat things sacrificed to idols. And I gave her time that she should repent; and she willeth not to 22 repent of her tus (/Suio?), is associated the word "depths" (to. fiad4a\ of our t(^xt. These are here called "the depths of Satan." The words, "as they say," appear to indicate that members of this sect were accustomed to claim for themselves a deeper knowledge than had been attained by others, and to justify their evil practices upon the ground that they had ascertained through this deeper knowledge justification for such practices to which the ordinary superficial Christian had not yet come. It was like those pagan "mysteries," admission to which was claimed to secure knowledge and privilege of this same nature. These were by the Thyatiran heretics called "the depths." Depths they were — but "depths of Satan." "We find coming before us, repeatedlj% in these messages to the churches, that unit)n with himself into which the Lord brings his people. It is made prominent again, here, in ver. 26, 27. This "power over the nations" is "as I received of my Father"; meaning, undoubtedly, that what he so receives he communicates. But the method of the com- munication should be e.specially noticed. Nor need this be any mystery to us, in this age of the world. The triumphs of Christianity, while achieved through the divine efficiency of the ascended Jesus, are achieved in.stru- mentally through his people. His power is in them; alike the authority (i^ovaCa) and tlie ability {Smaixis). The nations, it should also be noticed, are "broken to shivers "only so far as they are hostile to the Lord's own .spiritual kingdom. It is the element of hos- tility and resistance in them that is thus "broken." In all other respects, Christianity and Christian influence are a blessitig to "the nations" themselves. This is implied in the word "govern," "shepherd" (noifjiavet). It is government, the exertion of power, and of power irresistible, yet with designs such as those with which the shepherd "governs" his flock. 1-6. To THE CUURCH IN SaRDIS. 1. In.soription. Sardis. The spiritual condition in which each of these churches is found seems to have -its analogy, if not its explanation, in the character of the com- munity surrounding it, or the nature of those conditions under which its church life exists. The Church iij Sardis is an cxami)le and Ch. Ill] REVELATION. 59 type of the worldly church, and Sardis it- self appears to have been characterized in a way to afford, at least, the occasion for this. While the capital city of Croesus, King of Lydia, whose name is the very synonym of extravagant wealth, and in whose possession Cyrus, his conqueror, in b. c. 548, is said to have found treasure to the enormous value of six hundred million dollars, this city enjoyed also peculiar commercial advantages. How It is at least suggestive that the church planted here is found blameable, not for the heresies which have been so sharply con- demned in all save one of those before ad- dressed, but for that dead spiritual state which is so often the result of mere worldliness, neglect of the spiritual, and engrossment with the material. — He that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars. In "the seven Spirits of God," we have, as in much is fabulous and how much is true in what is related of the river Pactolus, on which the city stood, and its "golden sands," it maj' be impossible to say. Whether more or less of those sources of sudden and ex- cessive wealth which in modern times have contributed so much to a mere sordid love of money-getting, may have been within reach of the people of Sardis, the city appears to have been noted, in ancient times, for its commercial activity, its wealth and splendor. 1 : 4, anticipatory allusion to the symbolism in 4: 5 — "seven lamps of fire, burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God." We must reserve for its proper place more particular notice of this symbolism. Here it may suffice to say that the special force of its application is as indicating that which this same writer, in his Gospel (3:34) declares of our Lord — that "God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him" ; implying, also, perhaps, something of that which we 60 REVELATION. [Ch. III. 2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, tliat are ready to die; for I have not found thy works perfect before God. 2 Be thou watchful, and stablish the things that re- main, which were ready to die: for I liave 'found 1 Maiiv ancient auiliorities reud, not found thy tcork. have in Heb. 9: 14, "Who through the eter- nal Spirit, offered himself without spot to God." It is also the general doctrine implied in John 15: 16. In all these passages the Spirit is represented as in a peculiar relation with the Son in his redeeming work. Inef- fably distinguished, so that in some high sense they differ in their personality, they are so in essence one, as that our Lord's own fullness of spiritual endowment is represented as being "through the eternal .Spirit." The number "seven" in the passage before us, denoting completeness, perfection, is equiva- lent in its significance to what is said, as quoted above, that to Jesus the Spirit is given "not by measure" — that is to say, his en- dowment, as one divine, is perfect and in- finite. The connection suggests that the par- ticular attribute and office of the Spirit here alluded to is that implied in John 16: 8-11, if the common version be correct. "When he is come, he will 7'eprove,'^ etc. Such is the purpose and effect of the spiritual scrutiny now applied to this worldly church in Sardis. That our Lord hath "the seven stars," fol- lows upon the fact that he hath "the seven Spirits of God." The seven stars "are the angels of the seven churches" (1 = 20), held in the Lord's right hand. With him is the dis- pensation of the Spirit, and subordinate to him, accountable to him, are all those who have under this dispensation the ministry of the word. That he hath thus the seven Sjjirlts of God is a note of warning, especiallj' for the Church in Sardis, and its pastor. 1-3. Admo.vitiox. I know thy works, that thou bust a name that thou livest, and art dead. It is altogether fanci- ful to sui)pose, with Bengel and others, that allusion may be made here to the name borne by "the person who formed the centre of the presiding body at Sardis." Says Bengel: "There are in Greek, and in other languages also, many names which are de- rived from life, such as Zosimus, Vitalis, etc. Very likely the angel of this church had a fine name of this sort, and from it the Lord takes occasion to admonish him of the oppo- site nature of his condition." Hcngstenberg thinks there is "some probability" in this view. We .see no shadow of probability in it, nor any justification whatever for reading thus into the passage, what is plainly not there. By the mere fact of its formal exist- ence as a church, and by the pretension it put forward, the Church in Sardis had a name to live. It claimed to be a living church, in the very fact of maintaining its visibility as such; and to those who could not look beyond the outward semblance, it seemed to be a living church, and so had "the name" of such a one. It is quite unnecessary to look for any other meaning in the words than this plain one, lying thus upon the surface. "And art dead," declares what is true of this church, living thus only in name and in appearance. Some exception is implied below, in ver. 2, 4, to the general fact; yet the sad truth was, that in this Church at Sardis, as a Christian body, the spiritual life had so much waned that even this strong expression is justified. This life is, as Grotius says, secundum Chrifitum vivere, "to live according to Christ," having, manifesting, strong, and happy in, that life which is in him as the vine, and in his people as the branches. 2. Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain [tlie rrmainiiig fhinr/s] that are [wei-e] ready to die. The words "be watchful " [yivov vpijyopior), mean more than this simply. They mean literally, ''become watchful,''^ or ''awake and watch,'^ and im- ply a call to this church to rouse out of its slumberous state, and give earnest heed to that which alone can save it from complete extinction. When we come to notice these "things which remain," we see that the words above, "art dead," as already' observed, must be taken with some qualification. Thej' must mean "dead" so far as concerned the mani- festation of life, and to a perilous extent even the possession of life. Its condition was one of spiritual inertness, such as might consist with some remaining element of spiritual life, yet this itself in a donnant and feeble state. To reanimate this, "strengthen" it, is what the church is now enjoined to do. For even these things which remain "are Ch. III.] REVELATIOK 61 3 "Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, aud hold last, and 4 repent. "If therefore thou shalt not watch, 1 will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee. 3 no works of thine perfected before my God. Re- member therefore how thou hast received and didst hear ; and keep it, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come as a thief, and thou shalt not aX Tim. 6: 20; 2 Tim. 1 : 13 ; ver. II 6 ver. 19 c Matt. 24: 42. 43; 25 : 13 ; Mark 13: 33 ; Luke 12 : 39,40; 1 Thess. 5 : 2,6; 2 Pet. 3 : 10 : ch. 16 : 15 [vjere] ready to die." The Sinaitic and Alex- andrine manuscripts [also Codex Bezse and Codex Porphyrianu.s, i. e, H, A, C, P.— A. H.] require, here, the past tense. Alluding to this, Diisterdieck says: "The imperfect {''were ready, were about to die'] can be only under- stood as spoken from the standpoint of him who communicates the message (des Brief- schreibers) ; but it is also evident that as in the words 'I have found' (euprjKa) immedi- ately following, the Lord, who indeed is speaking, glances back to the before-men- tioned scrutiny of the church." This scrutiny is implied in the words which follow. — I have not found thy works perfect before God. In the words "before God," there may be antithetical allusion to what is said above of this church, "thou hast a name that thou livest." With men it had still a repu- table standing; but not "before God." Also in "I have not found thy works perfect," the standard by which all these churches, and all churches are tried, is indicated. It is re- quired of them that their works shall be " perfect" (Tren-Arjpw/iiefa) ; not in the sense of ab- solute perfection, but as "fulfilled" according to divine requirement, and in the measure justly expected even of fallible human beings. The Greek word means, literally, "made full"; the conception is not, therefore, one of holiness or the opposite, but of deficiency in measure. This fullness of performance the Lord had "found" in each of the churches before named, at least in such measure as that he could commend their "faith," their "patience," their "love," and their "ser- vice." Here, however, in Sardis, he finds that these things are lacking, and hence the ad- monition. The force of the Greek word for "before" (ivwniov), '■^ face to face with,'' "in the sight of," "in presence of," should be noticed. It implies how in the very pres- ence of God, under his very eye, all human life is led. The best manuscripts have "my" iixov), with " God " (©eoO). So that the passage correctly reads: "I have not found thy works perfect in the sight of my God." Alford says that the word "my" (iiov), "binds on the judgment of him who speaks to that of God." He who speaks does so in his capacity as mani- festing and representing that Godhead which he shares with the Father and with the Spirit. 3. Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard. What force shall be given to this particle, translated "how" (jtws)? Is it equivalent to "what"? or "in what manner?" or, "by what means?" The Greek word itself will not allow the first of these. The two other renderings may, perhaps, be combined in the significance of the passage as a whole. The words seem to point these dis- ciples at Sardis back to the beginning of their Christian life, bidding them consider hoiv that life had been first received. It was a gift of God in response to earnestness of desire, be- lieving prayer, and faithful doing on their own part. It is implied that in the same way must its life, now so sadly declined, be re- newed. The call of God they had then "heard" — let them hear it now. — And hold fast and repent. In the Greek, the first of these imperatives is in the present tense, the second in the aorist. It is a subtle distinction of sense which may be noticed. The first word suggests the idea that the holding fast is something to be continued ; the second word, "repent," in the aorist imperative, presents with emphasis the conception of the fact, that only, with no reference to the collateral idea of continuance. The injunction to "hold fast," to keep, implies that what was before "received" has not all been lost. Holding fast to this, and earnestly asking for acces- sions of the same gift, this church, even in its low spiritual state, may yet have a blessing. But it must realize its own sad decline, and of all that has been the cause of this, it must '"repent." — If, therefore, thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief. The injuction and the threatening are in manifest relation with each other. The coming as a thief in the night is more than once thus mentioned in the Gospels, as indi- cating the unexpectedness of the Lord's coming, when he comes to judge and punish. Hence the force of the word "watch" — 62 REVELATION. [Ch. III. 4 Thou hast "a few naiues even in Sardis which have not 'defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me "iu white: tor they are worthy. 5 He that overconie'th, ''the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not «blot out his name out of the /book of life, i)ut i/I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels. 4 know what hour I will come upon thee. But thou hast a few naiues in Sardis that did not detile their garments: and they shall walk with me iu white; 5 for they are worthy. He that overcometh shall thus be arrayed in white garments; and 1 will iu no wise blot his name out of the book of life, and I will confess his name before my I-ather, and before his a Aot9 1: 16.... 6 Jude 23 cch. 4: 4; 6: II ; 7:9. 13 d ch. 19: 8 e Ex. 32: 32; Ps. ( 12 ; 21 : ■il....g Mutt. 10 : 32 ; Luke 12 : 8. : 28. . . ./ Phil. 4 : 3 : ch. 13 : 8 ; 17:8; "wake and watch." Just as the thief comes unwatched for, and unprepared for by the slumbering household, so will judgment and punishment come upon this careless and world!}- church. — And thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee. This renews, with added emphasis, the warn- ing already given. The "coming" cannot be the second coming; but that visitation, provi- dential and punitive, in which the conse- quences here threatened shall be realized. In the Greek the words, "thou shalt not know," are made emphatic by the use of the double negative (oO ixri). They may be translated, "thou ce7'tainly shalt not know." 4-6. Promise. Thou hast a few names, even in Sardis, which have not defiled their garments. The corrected reading, according to Tischendorf, is, ''But thou hast a few names in [omitting even] Sardis which have not defiled their garments." These "few names" — few individuals in the church — represent the "things which remain." They are the redeeming element in the church, provided they have encouragement and support. That they have "not defiled their garments"— not partaken of the preva- lent spiritual decline and consequent defiling worldliness — is the characteristic of their better condition. The idea of fewness is, no doubt, to be strictly taken.— And they shall walk with me in white, for they are worthy. The promise, "shall walk with me in white"— that is to say, in \yhite robes, as is clearly suggested in the form of the Greek word for "white" (AeuKoIs) the word for "white" being plural— points back to that which is said of these faithful ones, that they have "not defiled their garments." The imagery is the familiar one of character viewed as a garment. They had preserved their Christian fidelity and consi.stency. The promise is that they shall have that best re- ward, pure and holy character, or nature in its completeness. AVe should notice the dis- tinction implied in garments "not defiled," and in garments made "white." The former means freedom from deforming and disgrace- ful stain ; the latter means freedom from every kind of imperfection; such being the idea set forth in the pure and perfect "white" in which the redeemed are clothed. The words "they shall walk with me," foreshadow that perfect union with himself into which the Lord will finally bring his redeemed, and their free and happy intercourse with him, in their saved state, as when friends "walk" together in perfect mutual communion. We naturally connect the words of promise in this place, with what appears in 7: 13, 14. "For they are worthy," is not to be taken as implying merits or as if what is promised rests for its condition and assurance upon any considera- tion of merit in themselves. They simply mean that they of whom this promise is spoken are such as they for lohoni it is in- tended. All the -gifts of salvation are through the unmerited grace of God in Christ; but they are given, not to the unbelieving, the unfaithful, and the defiled, but to the believ- ing, the faithful, and the pure. 5. He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment. A reitera- tion of the promise in more express terms. Tischendorf reads "thus" (oCtm?), in place of "the same" (oSto?); so that the passage as amended will stand, "he that overcometh thus," etc. — And I will not blot out his name out of the book of life. Diister- dieck says: "The figure of the Book of Life is not taken from the genealogical tables of the priests; but from similar lists, such as those which the magistrates kept, and from which the names of deceased citizens were stricken out." Ziillig's comment on the pas- sage is: "According to Exod. 32: 32, 33; Ps. 69: 28; Isa. 4: 3, God has a book, in which the names of all those to whom he has pur- posed to give (corporeal, natural) life are be- forehand enrolled. The name of him who dies is stricken out of this. This is 'the book of life,' or of 'the living,' the common mass of Ch. III.] REVELATION. 63 6 " He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit sailli iiuto the cliiirches. 7 And to the angel of the church in Philacleljjhia write: These things saith 'he that is holy, "he that is true, he that hath ''the key of David, ''he that opeueth, and no man shutteth; and /shutteth, and no man openeth ; 6 angels. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches. 7 And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write ; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and none shall shut, and that shutteth, and none openeth : och. 2: 7.... 6 Acts 3 : 14 c 1 John 5 : 20; ver. 14, oh. 1; 5; 6: 10; 19: ll....d Isa. 22: 22; Luke 1 : 32 ; ch. 1: 18.. 16: 19.... /Job 12: 14. those living on the earth and subject to the do- minion of the world-ruler. Something quite different is Dan. 12: 1, where it is a book in which are enrolled the names of those who, in that last (Messianic) trial of affliction come out of it with life, and, according to ver. 2, shall have now a better, an everlasting life. In this last form the Apocalypse here takes up the thought, and modifies it still further in this, that it is for it a book in which even before the world was made, the names of all future true confessors of Messiah Jesus were written, as the names of those whose life should have a part in his kingdom and in the ulti- mate Paradise, for which reason it is now called the Lamb's Book of Life." The im- agery is evidently founded upon the general conception of an enrollment, for whatever purpose. There may be in it, thus, a general reference to the genealogical tables of the priests; but it would be altogether too re- stricted a view to regard it as limited to these, and thus as having in view that priesthood which is affirmed of all the redeemed. The view taken is evidently much broader, and regards the redeemed as the elect, or as the enrolled ones. But can these names once written be "blotted out" ; the elect become non-elect? In truth, what our Lord here says is, virtually, that they cannot be blotted out. The overcoming of those faithful unto death is proof that their names are written in the Book of Life. The promise, "I will not blot out," is but declaring that to his own part of the "everlasting covenant," the Lord himself will be fiiithful. This he confirms in the following words: I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels. This looks forward to the great day, "when the Son of man shall come in his glory." The call to attention, "He that hath an ear," etc., comes, as in the case next before, at the close, not at the beginning of the promise. It solemnly enforces and em- phasizes all that has previously been said. GENERAL COMMENTS. In his notes upon ver. 5, Alford says: "Those who have a name that thej' live, and are dead, are necessarily wiped out of the Book oi Life; only he whose name is a living name, can remain on those pages." Ought we not to say, rather, that only he whose name is a living name, was ever written there? Can we suppose such a thing as that in the Book of Life those have been enrolled who have only a name to live? Again he says: "Thus they whose names have been once inscribed in this book, whether by their outward admission into Christ's church by baptism, or by their becoming living members of him by faith, if they endure to the end as his soldiers and servants, and obtain the victory, shall not, as all his [merely'] pro- fessed members shall, have their names erased from it." Such a view of the passage seems to us both confusing and misleading. We cannot suppose such a thing as that a false profession of living faith in the Saviour secures the enrollment of one's name in the Book of Life. Is God, who searches heartSj misled as easily by false professions, as men to whom the heart is a sealed book ? It seems to us that the words under consideration — "I will not blot out," etc. — are, as intimated above, simply an assurance to the faithful ones of the absolute and perfect trust with which they may leave their final salvation in the hands of him who.se promise and pledge they have. They are an encouragement to faith, at the same time that they are a stimu- lus to fidelity. 7-13. To THE Church in Philadelphia. 7. Inscription. To the angel of the Church in Philadelphia, Avrite. The his- torian Gibbon, while in a foot-note he in- dulges his customary spite against whatever savors of Christian truth, still in the text of his narrative (iv:260 Milman, Ed. Harper, 64 REVELATION. [Ch. III. 1844), in connection with his account of the conquest of all these seven cities by the Turks, in 1312-1392, says in a spirit of something like historical justice: "In the loss of Ephesus, the Christians deplored the fall of the first angel, the extinction of the first candlestick, of the Revelation; the desolation is complete, and the Temple of Diana or the Church of Mary will equally elude the search of the curious traveler. The circus and three stately theatres of Laodicea are now peopled with wolves and foxes; Sardis is reduced to a of honor and safety may sometimes be the same." The Philadelphia of to-day is a city of some ten thousand inhabitants, mostly Turks, "situated," says Schafi", "upon four or five flat summits at the foot of the Mount Tmolus." Among its conspicuous features is a solitary pillar, standing as if intended to illustrate the promise written in ver. 12 of this chapter, and a building now used as a mosque, but which tradition declares to have been the place of worship used by the Church of Philadelphia, as it was when addressed in PHILADELPHIA. miserable village; the God of Mahomet, with- out a rival or a son, is invoked in the mosques of Thyatira and Pergamos, and the populous- ness of Smyrna is supported by the foreign trade of the Franks and Armenians. Phila- delphia alone has been saved by prophecy or by courage. At a distance from the sea, for- gotten by the emperors, encompassed on all sides by the Turks, her valiant citizens de- fended their religion and freedom above four- score years, and at length capitulated with the proudest of the Ottomans. Among the Greek colonies and churches of Asia, Phila- delphia is still erect— a column in the scene of ruins— a pleasing example that the paths the message now before us. Philadelphia was less favorably situated than any of the other seven cities here mentioned. The region where it stands being volcanic, the city has been several times destroyed by earthquakes. In spite of these calamities it has survived, and, as narrated above, even when assailed by the invincible Ottomans, maintained a struggle for independence such as is recorded of no one of the far stronger neighboring cities. Strikingly analogous with this is what appears in this message of the Lord to the Church in Philadelphia; smallest and weak- est of the seven, beset and persecuted by "them of the synagogue of Satan" (ver. 9), it Ch. III.] KEVELATIOK 65 still had so maintained its integrity, that not one word of reproof appears in all that is here written. — These things saith he that is holy, he that is true. "The Holy One" (6 a-yios). "The True One" (6 aATjeii/d?). Each of the terms used indicates that which be- longs to the essential nature of the being de- scribed. The Holy One, therefore, means more than simply the Righteous One, and the True One more than simply one who utters truth, whether in promise, in testimony, or in threatening. Both terms alike affirm that which is really true of only one being, that is, God, in whom alone holiness and truth are essential. They also, quite plainly, look for- ward, in their significance, and lend em- phasis to that assertion of sovereigntj' over the house of David which follows. — He that hath the key of David. Interpreters are agreed in viewing this as a reference to the passage in Isaiah 22: 22, where it is said of Eliakim, son of Hilkiah, "The key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder, so he shall open and none shall shut, and he shall shut, and none shall open." Eliakim it is predicted in this place, shall be placed "over the house"— or the household— he made Hezekiah's prime minister, in the room of the unworthy Shebna. The key of the house of David is thus laid " upon his shoulder," in the sense th*t he is put in charge with those things which more immediately concern the regulations of the palace, and as well the king's relations with his people. Through this minister access will be had to the king — he is more or less in the position of a media- tor; the person through whom important affairs in the relations of ruler and ruled will be transacted. In this official position he ex- ercises large powers; he can open and shut doors of access to royal clemency or justice, and doors of royal favor, deserved or unde- served. In our present passage, therefore, the allusion is, clearly, to our Lord's position and office as the dispenser of blessings, and all kingly gifts. It should be noticed that in this place it is not "the key of the house of David" that is spoken of, but "the key of David' ^ ; so that the office and function hero asserted of himself by our Lord is not minis- terial, as acting for another, but royal, as acting bj' an authority quite his own. — He that openeth, and no man shutteth, and shutteth and no man openeth. The more exact reading is: "one? that openeth and no man shall shut, and shutteth and no man shall open.'' The imagery, of course, is suggested by that of the key. What it indicates is that the authority which our Lord exercises as King is absolute and final. This sover- eignty he uses, even in delegating to his church some representative exercise of a like prerogative, "/will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" (Matt. i6: 19), A certain authority, in teaching and disci- pline—a certain high privilege as dispensers of the offer of salvation through faith in hi.s name— was delegated by our Lord to his apostles, and through them to his whole church — to both as representing him, alike in teaching and in ruling. He is alwaj'S, how- ever, the Head of the Church, the King in Zion, David's son and heir, and who "hath the key of David." [It has been suggested that possibly this symbolism of "the key," in both passages above noticed, may be explained in another way; or rather, an auxiliary meaning be associated with this. In the article upon the "Scribes" in Dr. Smith's Dictionary of the Bible, the following passage occurs. The writer is speaking of the young scribe when finally admitted to full privilege as such : "After a sufficient period of training, prob- ably at the age of thirtj', the probationer was solemnly admitted to his office. The presiding rabbi pronounced the formula, 'I admit thee, and thou art admitted to the Chair of the Scribe,' solemnly ordained him by the im- position of hands, and gave to him, as the symbol of his work, tablets on which he was to note down the sayings of the wise, and the key of knowledge (comp. Luke 11 : 52), with which he was to open or to shut the treasures of divine wisdom." The writer of the article referred to. Dr. Plumptre, in his commentary upon Matt. 16 : 19, alludes to the custom men- tioned, and regards it as suggesting a "train of figurative thought" blending with that afforded us by the passage in Isa. 22: 22: "When they [the scribes] were admitted to their office they received, as its symbol, the key of knowledge (Luke 11:52), which was to admit them to the treasure-chambers of the 'house of the interpreter,' the Beth-Midrash 66 REVELATION, [Ch. hi. 8 "I know thv works: behold, I have set before thee 'an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept ujy word, and hast not denied uiv name. 9 Heboid, I will make "them of the synagogue of Satan, which sav thov are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, -'I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that 1 have loved thee. 8 I know thy works (behold, I have ' set before thee a door opened, which none can shut), that thou hast a little power, and didst keep my word, and didst not 9 deny my name. Kehold, I give of the synagogue of Satan, of those who say they are Jews, and they are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy leet, and to know that 1 have a ver. 1 i 1 Cor. 16: 9; 2 Cor. 2: 12 c cb. 2:9 d Isa. 49 : 23 ; 60 : 14. 1 Gr. given. of the Kabbis. For this work the Christ had been training his disciples, and Peter's con- fession had shown that the training had so far done its work. He was qualified to be a 'scribe instructed unto the kingdom of heaven,' and to 'bring forth out of its treas- ures things new and old,' and now the 'key' was given to him as the token of his admis- sion to that office." If this interpretation should be adopted for the passage in Matthew, it would eflectually dispose of the papistical assumption founded upon the words there. It is a less obvious one for the passage we have here under examination, though suggestive, also, for this. "The key of David"— since David was a ruler, not a teacher, or inter- preter of the law — implies, clearly, a different function from that of tlie scribe ; and must be meant here to affirm of our Lord the regal character which belongs to him as David's Son and Zion's King.] 8-13. Commendation and Promise. I know thy works. Not here spoken, as in other cases, by way of admonition, but rather of encouragement; implying that however feeble and small the Church at Philadelphia might seem, in point of numbers, whatever concerned its welfare was of importance to the Lord just the same, all the facts of its con- dition as well known, as if in the eye of man it had been itself of greater importance. — Behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it. "Open way of access to the knowledge of the Scrip- tures," is the sense given by one interpreter (Lyra); "an entrance into the joy of thy Lord, and so to uninterrupted progress in all good" (Bengel). Others take the words as referring in general to Christian privilege of access and spiritual intercourse with the Lord himself. The metaphor of "the key," as now explained, seems to make some such sense as this last necessary. But such privilege of access implies more than what might concern these Philadelphian Christians, as individuals. The assurance is given with special reference to those circumstances in their condition alluded to below, and to their need of specia'. grace. There may be a union of the two ideas — the door of access and the door of op- portunity. — For thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not de- nied my name. The force of the connecting particle "for," "because," should be noticed. It is a word of appreciation, and shows that if he who sees not as man seeth is prompt to mark and condemn the fault, he is no less prompt to recognize and approve that which is worthy. The connection of thought re- quires that in the phrase, "a little strength," the emphasis should be placed upon the word strength, not upon the word little. It is not because the strength is small, but because it is genuine. We have thus a thought in keeping with that which follows — " hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name." The reality and genuineness of Christian strengtJt, are witnessed by Christian^^^e/i^i/. It is thus that the prophet comforts himself (isa. 4|: 4) : "Then I said, I have labored in vain, I have spent my strength for nought, and in vain ; yet surely my judgment is with the Lord, and my work with my God." (See General Com- ments, below.) 9. Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan. The meaning is, "them (who are) of the synagogue of Satan"; the clause is descriptive. — Which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie. They are called a synagogue of Satan, in allusion to the fact that, as Jews, the sj'na- gogue organically characterizes them. Such as these here described have before been found at Smyrna, (2:9), where, as also here, they appear to be pointed out as conspicuous for their malice and bitterness. That they are declared to be of the synagogue of Sntait (the "accuser," the "adversary "), may refer to this spirit of malicious opposition, taking the form, not so much of actual violence — for, as themselves being under restraint in pagan communities, they would in this Ch. III.] REVELATION. 67 10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, "I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon 'all the world, to try them that dwell <^ upon the earth. 10 loved thee. Because thou didst keep the word of my ipatience, I also will keep thee from the hour of Atrial, that hour which is to come upon the whole ^world, to (2 Pet. 2: 9 6 Luke 2: 1 cisa. 24: 17. 1 Or, sted/astness 2 Or, temptation 3 Gr. inhabited earth. be held back — as of false accusation, mali- cious slander. In all cases, however, where violence was used by the pagan authorities or the pagan populace, such Jews were present, to encourage and enjoy the cruelties practiced. In calling themselves "Jews," in any such sense as being the Lord's favored people, they spoke falsely. For, in the first place, that distinction had ceased, so far as nationality was concerned ; and, in the next place, they were themselves lacking in all that was characteristic of the true, spiritual Israel. — Behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet. The sentence preceding is not finished, but breaks oflT before the end is reached, and a new form of expression is adopted. Literally, it reads thus: "Behold, I will make (give, SiSil) them which are of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie — behold, I will make (n-oi^o-w) them that they shall come and shall worship before thy feet." A corresponding passage is at Isa. 60: 14: "The sons also of them that afflicted thee shall come bending unto thee; and all they that despised thee shall bow themselves down at the soles of thy feet, and they shall call thee the city of the Lord, the Zion of the Holy One of Israel." An example is aflforded in connection with our passage, of Komanist misinterpretation. "Behold, I will make them come and wor.ship before thee," etc., is thus explained by Cornelius a Lapide: "This signifies that highest devotion of the faithful, reverence and submission as regards the church and its prelates. For this adora- tion proceeds from an apprehension of pre- latical excellence, more than human, though less than divine." Significatur summ,a fide- lium devotio, reverentia et submissio erga Ecclesiam ejusque Prcelatos. Hcbc enim, adoratio procedit ex apprehensione excel- lentioe Proelatorum,, plus quam, humnjice et m,inus quam divince. It is, of course, not of the devotion of faithful ones (fidelium de- votio) that the Lord is here speaking, but of the hostility of hypocritical pretenders — "which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie"; while to attribute to the humble Philadelphian pastor, either prelatical func- tions or prelatical pretensions, is as much in the face of history, as it would be to repre- sent the Apostle Peter as reigning at Rome in the pontificial splendor of his so-called successors. The passage can have no other consistent meaning than as promising to the few but faithful Christians at Philadelphia that the opposition which encounters them shall not prevail, but shall be eflFectually overcome and humhled. The expression, "worship before thee," must be taken in its Oriental sense — the act of prostration, implying not adoration, but respect. — And to know that I have loved thee. Some manuscripts read, "andfAo?« shalt know\\\&\, I have loved thee." The best authorities, however, seem to prefer that which is given above. The Lord's favor to these faithful ones is no doubt a testimony to themselves; but is mentioned here as carrying demonstra- tion and conviction to even their enemies. 10. Because thou hast kept the Avord of my patience. Great stress is laid, in many parts of our Lord's teaching, as also that of his apostles, upon "patience" — not the patience of mere submission, but that of active endurance — "patient continuance in well- doing" (Rom. 2-7). "We may cite Luke 8: 15; 21: 19; Matt. 10: 22; 24: 13; also, "theking- ! dom and patience of Jesus Christ," in the early part of the book we are now studying (1:9). "The word of my patience" must allude to such passages as these cited, and mean that injunction to "patience," steadfast- ness, and encouragement for it, of which these passages are examples. — I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation. "Hour of trial," this must mean; trial, that is, of a nature to put fidelity to the proof, and in general disclose character. In explaining this phrase, "hour of trial," it does not seem right to pass over all that was present and local, or soon to become so, to this Philadel- phian Church and pastor, and those events, alike in the near and the distant future, which the words, "hour of temptation," of trial, REVELATION. [Ch. III. 11 Behold, "I come quickly: 'hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take «thy crown. 11 'try them that dwell upon the earth. I come quickly : hold last that which thou hast, that no one take thy a Phil. 4:5; ch. 1:3, 22:7,12,20 6 ver. 3 ; ch. 2 : 25 c ch. 2 : 10. Or, tempt. would so appropriately describe, and limit the idea, as Alford does, to "the great time of trouble which shall be before the Lord's second coming." The promise is plainly meant for present strengthening and comfort, and so far from mere vague allusion to an indefinite, and in point of fact far-distant, future, must have reference to things more or less imme- diate and pressing. What should hinder our understanding by the words under considera- tion the very times of trial of which it is the purpose of this whole book, very largely, to speak, and the introduction to which was now already near at hand — that whole scene of Christian trial, of testing vicissitude, includ- ing along with bitter persecution the falling away of many, and the incoming of pernic- ious heresies; in all which Christian fidelity and the very spirit of the world itself should be put to the proof? In its broadest meaning, however, the "hour of temptation" may be viewed as embracing the whole of the present Dispensation, to which our own, with every other period, from the first to the second ad- vent, belongs. "I also will keep thee/row." What is the force of the preposition ? It can- not mean that faithful Christians have a prom- ise that they shall be spared all participation in the testing trials; for no promise of this kind has ever been given, nor has such ever been the experience of the Lord's people. " I pray not," said Jesus, "that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou sbouldest keep them from the evil.'- To de- note a keeping "away from,'" a different prep- osition (otto) would be used. The one here employed (tit), meaning "out of," impliesmore a safe can^yinf) through the " temptation" in- dicated, and final deliverance from it. The literal rendering would be, "taking thee out from the hour of temptation, which is about to come over all the habitable earth to try those who dwell upon the earth, I will keep thee." The word rendered "keep" means, in its full force, "keep securely." It is like what our Saviour asks for himself in John 12: 27: "F^ither, save me from [t/t — out of ] this hour." The promise, therefore, is that these to whom it is spoken shall be kept in the temp- tation, and in the Lord's good time delivered from it. — Which shall come upon all the world. In effect, "the world" was the Ro- man Empire. What was known of the world was nearly all included within tho.se limits, so that the expression we find often used with this meaning. That scene of persecution in which for Christians of the earlier ages the "temptation" so much consisted, had as we know this extent. — To try them that dwell upon the earth. "A sign which shall be spoken against . . . that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed." Such the "Child" was to be, and such he has ever been. The trial (Treipao-MoO) is not alone for Christians. The world, in these events, is put to the proof no le.ss, while in the vicissitudes and conse- quences of the long spiritual conflict, "them that dwell upon the earth" share. 11. Behold, I come quickly. "The word, I come quickly," says Hengstenberg, "is applicable to all times. Where sin is. and hostility toward the church of the Lord, there also the Lord is near." He thinks that the coming spoken of should be understood in close connection with ver. 10; it is a coming to bring upon the world the times of trial there implied. To interpret this expression "I come quickly," wherever it occurs, as meaning the Lord's second coming, is to force, quite unallowably, the inspired word into the narrow limitations of a preconcep- tion. In what sense the words are to be taken, will be best determined in each case by the connection. Here they must point to a com- ing of the Lord in those providential and judicial dispensations which were to attend the events foreshadowed in the warning al- ready given. The text followed by the re- visers omits the Greek for "behold." — Hold that fast which thou hast. The expression "that which thou hast" (5 ex"«) — as in 2: 6- "this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes" — implies throughout these messages some spiritual gift, grace, or sign of spiritual progress, already in posses- sion. Two things are suggested by the form of the expression here : first, that this which these Christians have is something greatlj- to be desired; and secondly, that there are those who would snatch it away from them. Let Ch. Ill] REVELATIOK 69 12 Him that overconieth will I make "a pillar in the teaiple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and * I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, tvhich is "new Jerusalem, which Cometh down out of heaven from my God: ''and J will icrite t/pun him my new name. 13 «He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit Faith unto the churches. 12 crown. He that overcometh, I will make him a pillar in the ^temple of my God, and he shall go out thence no more: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the ne\* Jerusalem, which Cometh down out of heaven from 13 my God, and mine own new name. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches. ol Kiugs7: 'it; Gal. 2 : 9. . . .6 ch. 2 : 17 ; 14: 1: 22: 4.... c G:il.4: 26 ; Heb. 12 : 22 ; ch. 21 : 2, 10... .d ch. 22: 4....e ch. 2 : 7.- Or, sanctuary : and »o ihroughout this book. them guard it well. — That no man take thy crown. That which they have in present possession is not the "crown" ; the crown is, rather, that which they are to gain by hold- ing fast this which they already have. Those who would "take" their crown are not com- petitors for it; but such as would prevent their attainment of it by enticing them to un- faithfulness. 12. Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God. The symbolism implied in the "pillar" is indi- cated in the words which follow, and he shall go no more out — with the emphatic form of the negative particle used (ov ixi)), "he shall certainly" — assuredly — "never go out." The leading idea is that of the firmness, the fixedness, of the pillar in its place, so that often it stands when other parts of the build- ing have fallen. Interpreters are divided, as to whether by "temple" shall be understood the church militant or the church triumph- ant. It is doubtful if it be wise to use the term "church" in this connection at all. Let it be noticed that the symbol is of a pillar in the temple. Did the temple pre- figure the church, in either of the senses just mentioned? We conceive that it prefigured, rather, that New, Spiritual, Dispensation of which the church is simply one feature. When this Dispensation reaches its final consummation in the completed redemption of all the "called" and the "glorified," the temple-types all attain their ultimate and perfect fulfillment. In the anticipatory sense, as we may say, they do so in that condition of blessedness into which saved souls are received as they enter heaven. We do not see, therefore, that the promise in question implies aught else but the semrity of the true believer, in his place amongst those whom the Lord calls, and especially in his final saved state. (See General Comments). — And I will write upon him the name of my Gody and the name of the city of my God, which is New Jerusalem. The divine name to denote that he belongs to God, the name of the city of God to denote his citizenship there. The coming down of this city out of heaven, points forward to what is said later in the book. It is that con- summation of the divine purpose of grace, in which the distinction of earthly state and heavenly state ceases, the redemption being complete. — And my ncAV name. The words, in our version, 'I will write upon him," are supplied, the sense plainly requiring that they shall at least be understood in reading. The Kedeemer's "new name" is that which he acquires in becoming the Redeemer. The redeemed bear it to show that they belong tp him. GENERAL COMMENTS. In the words, "for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name," it is perhaps proper to see something antithetical intended. For the strong — those who have much "strength " — to keep the Lord's word and confess his name, is less to be remarked, perhaps, than when this fidelity is found in them that have ^'little strength." This we should say, at all events, where the strength spoken of refers to those elements of power — numbers, social pre- dominance, etc. — which might enable a comr munity of Christians to cope on more equal terms with hostility and opposition. There may, however, be something delusive in the appearance of strength seen in such a com- munity. In the case of these Seven Churches in Asia, the relatively strong are the weak ones, while the weak are the strong. Even Ephesus had left its first love ; even Per- gamos and Thyatira had yielded too much to the pernicious false teachers ; Sardis had become worldly, and Laodicea, though "rich and increased with goods," was "poor, and blind, and naked"; Philadelphia, its moun- tain home often shaken by the earthquake, assailed within by bitter enemies, few and 70 REVELATION. [Ch. hi. 14 And unto the angel of the church of the Laodi- ceana write ; "Those things saith the Amen, * the faith- ful and true witness, 'the beginning of the creation of Cjod ; 14 And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true alsa. 65: 16....i ch. 1 : 5 ; 19: 11; 22: 6; ver. 7....cCol. 1: 15. small in itself, nevertheless had that word of supreme applause: Thou "hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name." What strength it had, whetlier in numbers or in graces, was real strength. It is the genuine in this world, that wins victories. Something of this may also be implied in the symbolism of the pillar. Only the best material is selected for this part of the build- ing; and because of its genuine solidity it endures. Because of their own possession of this quality the Philadelphian Christians had " kept the word " of their Lord's "patience"; had been steadfast and enduring. They had thus far stood, each as a pillar in his place. They shall continue thus to stand in "the hour of temptation" that approaches, and in the final redemption they shall be pillars again in the glorious temple where all types are fulfilled, and they that have sought "for glory, and honor and immortality" receive "eternal life." To be, in reality, what we are named, should be deemed by us, as rospects personal attainments, the indis- pensable thing. In the description of the holy city. New Jerusalem, given later in this book {21:22), we read: "And I saw no temple therein." What we have in our present passage, if taken as proposed, might be thought inconsistent with this; since we read, in the connection, of the temple and the city in a way to imply that in the one the other is found. The pas- sage in 21 : 22, taken as a whole, furnishes the e.xplanation. "I saw no temple therein, /or the Lord. God Aimighty and the Ijrimh are the temple of it." That is, the temple and the city are one, and it is the presence of God and the Lamb tliat constitutes both. We are not, therefore, to press the symbolism in either case in a literal way, but understand that under the image of sensible things, spiritual things are set forth. The final state of the redeemed shall be a.s ifn walled city had been built for their eternal habitation, and their citizenship there shall be assured, as if upon the forehead of each the name of the city, in token thereof, were written. It shall be as if all the saved had, in the process of redeeming and glorifying grace, "grown into an holy temple in the Lord," wherein should be real- ized the whole purpose of infinite love, the types of the old temple all fulfilled, and the faithful ones all standing there, fixed and shining, forever. To forget that this is im- agery, in every part of it, is to mistake in a strange way the divine thought in it all. Let it be observed that while we view the promise as addressed to the whole church, it is indi- vidualized by what is said in the connection — " to him that overcometh." It is, therefore, a promise especially to each individual Christian. The Kedeemer's "new name" points us to that mission and mercy of his in which he places himself in such a " new" re- lation with a sinful world., The "name" represents alike the person and the office. As Eedeemer, he came in a new manifestation, and in an undertaking unexampled in the history of the universe. His name of "Em- manuel," God with us; of "Jesus," because he shall save his people from their sins ; of the " Lamb," slain from the foundation of the world; of "Shepherd," leading and feed- ing, and saving his flock ; of "Kedeemer," as comprehending all — these and this are his "new name." To bear that name, written upon us by his own hand, is to be ourselves redeemed. 14-22. To THE Church at Laodicea. 14. Inscription. — The angel of the church of the Laodiceans. There is no good reason for the change in form made here in the Common Version. A correct translation makes the clause read as in the instances above, "the angel of the church in Laodicea." — These things saith the Amen. It seems fitting to connect these words, with the title which our Lord claims for himself, with Isa. 65: 16: "That he who blesseth himself in the earth shall bless him- self in the God of truth" — (Elohe "Amen") —"the God of Amen" "the God of faith- fulness." It is the very highest expre.ssion of divinity. "He that blesseth himself in Ch. III.] REVELATION. 71 the earth," says Jehovah by his prophet, shall bless himself in the God thus revealed in the attribute most truly divine, if such a thing could be, "and he that sweareth in the earth" — he who pledges his own truth in the most solemn way — "shall swear" by him who is the very essence of truth, and who will not endure untruth or deceit. When, therefore, our Lord entitles himself "the Amen," it is a title in eftect identical with this in Isaiah, "the God of Amen" — the Divine and Faithful One. Ziillig thinks that this title, "The Amen," is used here, away." The Greek words in our passage, for "faithful and true (jtio-to? koI aArjen'o?),' are those which express essential faithfulness and truth in the strongest manner. — The be- ginning of the creation of God. The Sinaitic manuscript reads, "the Amen and the faithful and true witness, and the beginning of the church of God." Some commentators, as Grotius, Wetstein, and others, before the discovery of this manu- script, had already taken "creation (Krio-ews)" as equivalent to "church (e-cKArjcnas)," mean- ing by this that new creation, the church, in LAODICEA. — ASIA MINCE. because this is the last of the messages to the churches; and that it looks back upon all which have gone before, as being the solemn "amen" to them all. This seems, as Alford terms it, "fanciful." The clause which fol- lows. The faithful and true witness, is in some measure appositional. It is the second time, already, in this book, that our Lord is styled "the Witness," and "the faithful Witness." This office of his seems thus to be emphasized. We are re- minded of his own declaration in another place: "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words [word of testimony, word of promise, word of threatening] shall not pass its large spiritual sense. If the new reading in the manuscript alluded to may be accepted, this will be plainly the meaning of the pas- sage. In either case, the force of the word "beginning (apxi))" is much the same. It means beginning in the active, not the pas- sive sense. It means "origin," "cause," with the implication also of "headship." We should probably read "creation," and not "church," making the sense of the passage as a whole, correspond with that in John 1: 3: "All things were made by him, and without him was not anything made that was made," and in Heb. 1: 2: "By whom also he made the worlds." The Greek word (i-pxn), 72 REVELATION. [Ch. hi. 15 "I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. If) So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of uiy mouth. 17 Ik'cause thou sayest, 'I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need ol' nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked: 15 witness, the beginning ofthe creation of God: I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot; I would 16 thou wert cold or hot. So Iwcause thou art lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spew thee out of my 17 mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and have gotten riches, and have netkl of nothing ; and knowest not that thou art the wretched one and miserable and over. 1 6 Hos. 12: 8; 1 Cor. 4: 8. however, expresses along with the idea of originating cause, that of ruler and prince. The whole passage, therefore, asserts for our Lord that supreme place which is so often in the New Testament declared to be his. (Comp. the entire first chapter of Hebrews, and al.so Rev. 17: 14). 15-19. Admonitiox. I know thy works. In this case the admonitory words have a warning emphasis. As Alford paraphrases; "I have thy whole course of life before me, and its testimony is: "that thou art neither cold nor hot. The spiritual condition of these Laodicean Christians is characterized differently from that of either of the before- named churches. In some respects it re- sembles that of the Church in Ephesus; yet we find no such testimony here as is given there, to the patience and fidelity once char- acterizing the church, and still in some meas- ure found in it. The whole Laodicean body is spoken of as fallen into that "lukewarm'' (ver. 16) state, wliich is neither real life nor actual death. — I would thou wert cold or hot. Nowhere, perhaps, is the unworthi- ness and the peril of a merely negative Christianity more forcibly indicated than in the fact that our Lord has here spoken these words. The Laodicean condition is not, indeed, one of perfect deadness to all spirit- ual things; there is a feeble life, a doubtful warmth, and so far the condition may be a hopeful one. But while this comes far short of what ought to be found in souls redeemed by the blood of Christ and honored with the call to serve him, it is full of danger, because resting in the.se feeble indications of spiritual life, the lukewarm Christian may live and die onli/ " not far from the kingdom of God." I would thou wert either the one or the other- says he who searches the heart. 16. So then becau^se thou art luke- warm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of my mouth. It should ])e observed here, that the word in the Greek above, "heat" (i«rTo«), properly means heat in its action upon fluids. So "lukewarm" (xAiapbs), means a lukewarm fluid, like water. The figure employed is, therefore, carried out consistently. The effect of warm water in producing nausea is well known. No reader can fail to mark the expressive force with which the Lord's displeasure with the negative sort of Christian condition here de- scribed is expressed. Perhaps the word dis- gust is not too strong a word to use. It may be well to notice at this point a singular read- ing in the Sinaitic manuscript. As found there, the verse is: "Because thou art thus luke- warm, and neither cold nor hot; refrain thy ynoutli (TTdvo-ai ToO (TTOAiaTos trou)," or " cease from thy mouth." How such a manifest error of reading can have crept in, it might be hard to explain. Tischendorf, very properly as all must feel, rejects it, and retains that of the received text: "I will spew thee out of my mouth (m^AAu ore e/ueo-ai ex ToC ard/iiaTd? jiou)." I am on the point of doing so. It will be seen that the words do not express a final purpose; but imply that there is still a day of grace for the Laodicean Church. 17. Because thou sayest. It is ever true that none are .so well satisfied with their spir- itual state as half-and-lialf Christians. The truly spiritual are spiritually se?zsi!fn?e; they are alive to their own deficiencies, and earn- estly seek for the "more grace." The spir- itually inert are wont to be self-satisfied; the name suffices them for the reality, and they willingly mistake a superficial religimisnes.^ for piety. The "because" connects the be- ginning of this ver.*e with that of the follow- ing one: "Because. ... I counsel thee." — Rich and increased with goods, and have need of nothing. Alford says, very truly, that "from tlic wliole context it is evident that not outward worldly wealth, but imagined spiritual riches, are in question"; this "im- agined .spiritual .self-sufficingness" being "the natural growth of an outwardly prosperous condition." From the same writer's '"Pro- legomena" we quote the following. Of Lao- Ch. III.] REVELATION. 78 18 I counsel thee "to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou luayest be rich; and 'white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and Ihal tlie shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. 18 poor and blind and naked: I counsel thee to buy of me gold refined by fire, that thou mayest l)ecome rich; and white garments, that thou mayest clothe thyself, and that the shame of thy nakedness be not made manifest ; and eyesalve to anoint thine eyes, that thou a Isa. 55: 1; Matt. 13 : 44 ; 25: 9.... 6 2 Cor. 5:3; ch. 7 : 13 ; 16: 15; 19 : I dicea he says : " It suffered much in the Mith- ridatic War, but recovered itself, and became a wealthy and important place, at the end of the republic and under the first emperors. It was completely destroyed by the great earthquake, in the reign of Nero, but was re- built by the wealth of its own citizens, without help from the State. Its state of prosperity and carelessness described in the epistle is well illustrated by these facts It produced literary men of great eminence, and had a great medical .school. "^And knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked. The contrast between the imagined state of the Laodicean Church and its real one is made exceedingly striking, and is expressed in words strikingly bold and unsparing. In so far as outward things were concerned, it was, in fact, rich, increased in goods, having need of nothing. Because of this prosperous outward state it had, all too hastily, assumed in itself a like spiritual condition. The Lord's words show what utter spiritual poverty may be covered by worldly shows and splendors. 18. I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire. The word "buy," here, is not a good translation ; or, if allowed to stand, for the sake of its emphatic force, must not be too literally pressed. The Septuagint uses the same word {ayapiiu>) at that place in Isa. 55: 1: "Come, buy wine and milk with- out money, and without price." It is clear that as so used the word cannot mean buying by paying an equivalent for that which is bought. It is the more important to note this distinction, as papistical writers use the pas- sage here in our chapter in .support of their own pernicious doctrine as to the efficacy of good works, i Thus Lyra: "cj?ie?'e operibus bonis" "to buy with good works" ; and to a similar effect various others, whom Alford quotes. Stuart trani^lates: "I coun.sel thee to procure of me gold tried by fire"; claiming that the Greek word does not always have the specific meaning of buying a thing by paying a price for it. It may be better, however, to retain the word "buy" in the translation, pro- vided the figurative force of it be recognized in the exposition. What men buy they are understood to place a value upon and strongly desire. Besides, even that which comes to men in the gift of Christ, is in one sense con- ditioned, and comes only to those in whom the conditions are met. It is, however, none the less a gift, and is by no means to be viewed as if purchased by the payment for it of an equivalent value. Something of this is implied by our Lord, here, in representing the gift which these Christians are exhorted to secure as "gold," which in common usage is rather that by which the purchase is made, than the object purchased; and when he adds, "that thou mayest become rich," it is made clear that what he is recommending is that essential wealth which is rather the basis than the object of barter. He would have them procure of him the absolute spiritual riches, given to those who seek, with a view to use for the glory of him who gives, and to be sought with the earnest desire of him in the parable, who having found a pearl of great price, "went and sold all that he had and bought it." Notioe, also, that it is "gold tried [purified] in the fire"; that which is precious as freed from alloj', pure and true. — ■ And white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed [that thou mayest cast them about thee], and that the shame of thy naked- ness do not appear. The "gold" repre- sents spiritual riches in general; the "white raiment," spiritual character. A contrast is implied of this true adornment with those outward ones in which the wealth of the Laodiceans enabled them readily to indulge. There is allusion, also, to the strong antith- esis in ver. 17. Outwardly, in every worldly .sense, they were amply arrayed and adorned. Inwardly, and in respect to that in which true adornment consists, they were "naked." The white raiment is ottered, that the shame of this nakedness may be taken away. — So were they "blind," and hence this added counsel : Anoint thine eyes with eye- salve, that thou mayest see. To all this they are "counseled"; implying, thus, how 74 REVELATION. [Ch. III. 19 "As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent. 20 Behold, 'I staud at the door, and knock: "if any man hear my voice, and open the door, <'! will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. 21 To him that overcometh <-will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with niv Father in his throne. 22 /He that" hatli an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. 19 mayest see. As many as I love, I reprove and chasten : 20 be zealous therefore, and repent. Behold, I stand at the door and knock : if any man hear my voice and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup 21 with him, and he with me. He that overcometh, 1 will give to him to sit down with me in my throne, as I also overcame, and sat down with my Father in 22 his throne. He that hath an ear, let hini hear what the Spirit saith to the churches. a Job 5' 17- ProT. 3 • U, 12; Heb. 12 : 5. 6; James 1: 12 b Cant. 5:2 c Luke 12: 37 d John 14 : 23 e Matt. 19 : 28 ; Luke 22 : 30 ; 1 Cor. 6:2; 2 Tim. 2 : 12 ; ch. 2 : 26, 27. . . ./oh. 2:7. freely they act who, even as drawn by the constraining Spirit, come to Christ for all good things. 19. As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. These are surely noticeable words, as following upon such an unsparing exposure of the faults of the Laodicean Church. They reveal the spirit in which even the sharpest utterances of divine reproof are made. The meaning is that rebuke and chastening may be signs of love, even where they indicate dis- pleasure. The words "rebuke" and "chas- ten" themselves imply this. Literally, the word for "rebuke" means "bring to con- viction," and that for "chasten" {naiSevu}), means "to discipline." To convict and so lead to repentance, and to discipline, are acts, not of judgment, but of mercy. — Be zeal- ous, therefore, and repent. The exhor- tation, "be zealous," has reference to that fault of spiritual supineness, lukewarmness, which is the chief fault found in these now addressed. That they may come to repent- ance is the whole purpose of the severe dis- closure of their fault that has been made. The whole address is like the vigorous treatment sometimes found necessary in rousing the sleeper. 20-22. Promise. Behold, I stand at the door, and knock. Says Stuart: "The imagery here employed is that of the Saviour as going around among the dwellings of the Laodicean Church, and paying a visit to each, and holding friendly intercour.se with each." The preposition" at" (eiri) following "stand" is itself followed by the accusative case, and suggests the idea, "having come to the door, lam standing and knocking." By the knock- ing must be understood the means used, provi- dential and r)ther — including the message here Bent — to gain the attention of this lukewarm church, and stir it to duty. — If any man hear my voice. This implies a call, in connection with the other form of summons. — And open the door. The entrance of the Lord is never a forced entrance. Whatever of difficulty there may be in mutually adjusting the human freedom and the divine constraint, so that neither shall invade the sphere of the other, it is certain that the opening of the door is the soul's own free act. — I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me. Observe the reciprocity implied. He who comes thus as a guest, comes laden with all spiritual good things, and is both guest and host. 21. To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne. The partici- pation begun in the mutual communion just described shall be continued, not only while this present state of trial and discipline lasts, but in that future state of glorj' and beatitude, when the overcoming of Christian conflict and victory shall at last reach its consumma- tion. The "throne" must be treated, of course, as imagery, and simply points to that participation with him in the glory to which he ascended that is to be the portion of his redeemed ones. — Even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. A most fitting close to this series of messages spoken bj' the glorious being stand- ing in the midst of the golden candlesticks. The divine splendors of that vision of the Lord, so lately the Crucified One, now the Exalted and Reigning One, justify these words, "as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." That has come to pass of which in his humiliation he had spoken when he prayed : "And now, O Fatiier, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory wliich I had with thee before the world was" (Johui7:5). To R participation in this glory he invites us all. 22. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. "And what I say unto you, I say unto all. Watch." (Mark 13: 37). Ch. IV.] REVELATION. 75 CHAPTER IV. AFTER this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and "the tirst voice which I heard ivas as it were of a trumpet talking with uie; which said, 'Come up hither, "and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. 1 Aftkr these things I saw, and behold, a door open- ed in heaven, and the first voice that I heard, a voice as of a trumpet speaking with me, one saying, Come up hither, and I will shew thee the things which must och. 1: 10....6cli. ll:12....coh.l:19; 22:6. GENERAL COMMENTS. Christianity of the Laodicean type is that ■which, in an age like our own, finds peculiar occasion and opportunity. There is nothing to indicate that the Christians of Laodicea had any share in the persecutions experi- enced by neighboring churches. They do not seem to have been disturbed by heresies of a pernicious or immoral kind. They were prospered in all worldly circumstances. They represent to us an age in which persecution has become impossible; in which the false teacher, if he appears, bears for the most part a plausible exterior, so as seriously to offend neither formal piety nor outward morality ; and in which Christianity has so far prevailed as that those who avow it are no longer "a sect everywhere spoken against." The pecu- liar danger of such a time is exactly this "lukewarmness," which wears so fair an outside, yet which to the Lord himself is so displeasing. "I would thou wert cold or hot," is what his word declares at such a time. A negative Christianity — one which comes easily into alliance with the world, which selects out of revealed truth only that which to the worldly mind is least offensive, and amongst the attributes of Christian char- acter, only that which least characterizes "a peculiar people" — such a Christianity as this, ruinous to souls, dishonoring to the very name it bears, the Lord abhors. In our own time it finds only too ready acceptance, and i,s onlj' too much a characteristic of the age itself. In closing our study of these Epistles to the Seven Churches, we cannot but remark how large a body of precious truth is contained in them, and how representative these churches are of the many varieties of spiritual condi- tion in which churches and Christians of all ages are wont to be found. There is for this reason all the more of emphasis in the words found in connection with each of these epis- tles, and with which the last of them is con- cluded : "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." THE THEOPHANY. 1-3. The Vision of God. 1. After this. There is no reason to sup- pose any considerable interval of time between the ending of the vision described in Chapters II. and III., and the beginning of this which now opens. The phrase, "after these things (/utra raOra)," or "afterwards," occurring so often in the book, does not necessarily imply any such intervals, but simply the successive stages of the revelation made. — I looked, and, behold, a door was opened. The word is simply, "I beheld," or "I saw" (€l6oi'). "We must not translate so as to imply that John saw the door in the act of opening. The exact and literal ren- dering would be, "I saw, and behold a door having been opened (ij^oiv/ueVij," or "a door which had been opened" — an opened door. — In heaven. — Stuart appears to take the Greek word, here, (ovpavoi), as equivalent to the Hebrew word "firmament {rakiija)," understanding, thus, hy the door, an opening in the firmament above, as when at the bap- tism of Jesus (MMtt.3:i6) "the heavens were opened unto him." This does not seem to be the meaning of the writer in our passage. It is a door opened "in," not "'into" heaven. Some interpreters, again, seem to regard the word as used in that symbolical sense in which by "heaven" is supposed to be meant the church. Thus Gill: "The phrase is to be understood of a discovery of things that were, or were to be, in the Church of God, which in this book is often signified by heaven." Diisterdieck's comment is better, that the "heaven" is not to be here thought of as an arched vault [the firmament], nor a temple, but as the house or palace of God, in which he sits enthroned. Subsequent occurrences of the word, how- ever, make it doubtful if even this expresses the whole idea. For example, in ch. 12, we read of the woman clothed with the sun, the great red dragon, and the war between Michael and the dragon, as all being "in heaven." We cannot suppose 1,hese to be 76 REVELATION. [Ch. IV. 2 And immediately "I was in the Spirit: and, behold, 'a throne was set in heaven, and ohk sat on the throne. 2 'come to pass hereafter. Straightway I was in the Spirit : and behold, there was a throne set in heaven, och. 1: 10: 17: 3; 21: 10.... 6 Is .6: 1; Jer. 17: 12; Ezek. ) : 26 ; 10: 1 ; Dau. 7:9.- way, etc. -Or, come to pass. After these things straight- Seen "in the palace, or house of God." In the same connection we are told how the tail of the dragon sweeps to the earth "the third part of the stars of heaven." It would seem, therefore, that the word is used with a very broad, and a somewhat vague meaning. Perhaps we may best take it as implying, in general, the scene of the Apocalyptic wonders exhibited in this book. These are seen in vision, and in such a blending, if we may so say, of the highest heaven with the physical one, or the firmament, as that both are more or less implied. On this Apocalyptic scene a door is opened, revealing, in august pre-eminence, that grouping of transcen- dently glowing forms composing the Theo- phany now to be described. — And the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me. The literal and accurate rendering, here, is very impor- tant to the sense. The whole passage should read: "I saw, and behold a door which had been opened in heaven, and the voice [the interjectional form is continued, as if it read, "and behold the voice," etc., the word "behold" (iSoii) being in fact repeated in the Sinaitic manuscript] the first one (») iovrj i) Tpionj) which I had heard, as of a trumpet [comp. 1 : 10] speaking with me." The mean- ing is, that he liears the same voice which at the opening of the preceding vision he had heard. The angelic attendance is continued here, and the same voice addresses him. — Which said, Come up hither. We are not, of course, to suppose any change of bodily presence. It is well known how in- dependent, for a special purpose, the soul may for a time be made of its bodily liabi- tation. Paul tells us, in a well-known pas- sage (2Cor. 12: 2-4), of "a man in Christ," him- self no doubt, "caught up to the third heaven" and made to hear "unspeakable words." Other examples of a like kind are upon authentic record. It is an ecstatic, trance-like condition, in which the soul be- comes independent of the body for all pur- poses of self-transmission, perceiving, hcftr- ing, and knowing. — And I will show thee things which must be hereafter. These words should be especially marked. They are a clue to the real purpose of all the visions which follow, and to the symbolism employed in relating them. This one now immediately before us, while it is a vision, a manifestation of God, a "theophany," does not have this for its sole, or even its chief aim, nor does it even attempt to make any adequate revelation to us of the divine and the heavenly glory. It simply presents to view, under a guise of resplendent imagery, so much of the attributes of the Divine Being, and so much of what is heavenlj^ as may further the end really in view — which is to show things that must be hereafter. 2. And immediately I was in the Spirit. "Immediately I became in the Spirit." The seer must have been "in the Spirit" when he saw the door open, and heard the voice of the angel, since these things would be plainly impossible to one in his normal state. There came now, however, as Alford explains, "a new accession of the Spirit's powerful in- fluence." — And, behold, a throne was set in heaven. "A throne lay in heaven," would be the more exact translation. But the English word so used, would not convey an idea congruous and becoming, in our idiom. We never speak of a throne as "laid." "Was placed" would convey a wrong impression, as if the act of placing the throne occurred under the eye of the seer. We nvAy render, "And lo, a throne had been set, or placed in heaven.' What is to be understood is that, as .John in the S))irit drew near and gazed upon the amazing vision be- fore him, the object which first engaged his attention was "a throne." — And one sat [was sitting] on the throne. The Divine Being thus revealed is, in subsequent parts of the book, named as "God which sitteth ui)on the throne" (':io), "God that sat on the throne" (is^^), "him that sitteth upon the throne" (5:i»), where a plain distinction is made between him who is thus .«eated, and "the Lamb," as also in 6: 16, "hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb." It is God the Father who is meant. His enthrone- Ch. IV.] EEVELATIOK 77 3 And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stoue: "and there ivas a rainbow round about the throne, iu sight like unto an emerald. 3 and one sitting upon the throne; and he that sat was to look upon like a jasper stone and a sardius: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, like an merit, in the vision, implies that supremacy in point of office, if we may so speak, every- where in the New Testament assigned to him ; the Second Person in the Trinity appearing throughout these visions in those offices which he assumed as the Redeemer of men, and " Prince of tlie kings of the earth" ; and the Third Divine Person, under another sym- bolism, soon to be noticed, as the spiritual Enlightener and Purifier. It is to be ob- served that John does not name either the Father, the Son, or the Spirit, in this opening vision ; his narrative of what he saw being strictly in accordance with the impression made upon him as he gazed. He tells us simply what he did see, without attempting, at all, to go back of the vision as it actually was, or to explain the striking figures that appeared in it, otherwise than as they pre- sented themselves to him at the moment. There seems no good reason to suppose, with some commentators, that the Divine Occu- pant of the throne is not here more expressly indicated because of any Jewish reserve in uttering the name regarded by Jews as too sacred to be spoken. Such reserve would be out of keeping with the whole spirit of the New Testament. When Jesus taught men to say "Our Father," he set a seal of discredit upon all whatever which should make the divine name a name of dread, save to its enemies. 3. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone. We are here reminded of what Ezekiel saw in the vision related in the beginning of his proph- ecy (i:*). Out of that "brightness" which symbolized the divine presence and glory, there was "as the color of amber, out of the midst of the fire" — an amber-colored gleam. Again, in 8:3, there is described, "as the appearance of brightness, as the color of amber." Daniel (7:9) describes "the Ancient of Days" in a garment white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool ; his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire." More nearly parallel with our present passage is that in Eev. 21 : 11, where, of the New Jerusalem, "descending out of heaven from God, having the glory of God," it is said that "her light was like unto a .stone most precious, even like a jasper- stone, clear as crystal." The jasper is de- scribed by ancient writers as of many colors : "purple, cerulean, green, etc," says Stuart, and sometimes of a crystal whiteness. It is the last that seems intended here — the pure white jasper, "crystal-like in clearness." The sardine-stone— sardius — was a red colored stone — "the blood-red sardius," one ancient writer calls it. The crystal jasper may be taken as symbolizing divine holiness; the blood-red sardius God's punitive righteous- ness. Some interpreters think we should con- ceive the description here, as if the crystal- like appearance is seen in one part, and the red in another— "the clear light of the jasper above, and the red gleam of the sardius below"; so Diisterdieck quotes Ziillig and Hengstenberg, not, however, with approba- tion. Diisterdieck himself thinks we should view the jasper radiance and the sardius radiance as blending in a twofold gleam igedojypelte Glanz) — "a profoundly significant token of the essential oneness of God's holi- ness and righteousness." — And there was a rainboAV round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald. Soine commenta- tors, as Bengel and Hengstenberg, think we should conceive this bow as encompassing the encircling thrones of the twenty-four elders, mentioned in the next verse. There is noth- ing in the description given to indicate this. What John sees is evidently like that which Ezekiel describes in his own vision (i:2s): "As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appear- ance of the brightness, round about"; the surpassing and over-awing splendor of the divine manifestation being thus encircled with the reassuring token of covenant mercy. The bow may be viewed as having the ap- pearance of a crown encircling the head of the throne, and of the august being seated there. Whether the word in the Greek text ('pi«) should be translated "rainbow," strictly with the meaning commonly attached to that word, may be doubtful. But a single color is here mentioned — the emerald green. Some 78 REVELATION. [Ch. IV. 4 "And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw lour and twenty elders sitting, ''clotlied in white raiment; <^and they had on their heads crowns of gold. 4 emerald to look upon. And round about the throne were four and twenty thrones: and upon the thrones I saw four and twenty elders ^5ittiug, arrayed in white ach. U : 16....& ch. 3:4, 5; 6 : 11 ; 7:9, 13. U; 19: 14.... ever. 10. think that we may simply view this as the predominnting color. It is safer to take the description as it reads. For the same reason, we decline the suggestion of other interpre- ters, that a blending of the three colors named may be intended — the jasper, the sar- dius, and the emerald. The meaning seems to be that the two former are seen united in the resplendence of the divine form filling the throne, while the encompassing bow bears simply the soft green of the emerald. "In agreement with the symbolical meaning of that twofold gleam," says Diisterdieck, al- luding to the jasper and the sardius, "is the mild emerald, which indeed in itself is a token of the divine grace." He does not ac- cept, however, Hengstenberg's view that the bow in the vision here is, as the latter sup- poses it to be, always "a sign of grace return- in[i after wraths He prefers that of Grotius : "In his judgments God is ever mindful of his covenant." {Deus in judiciis foederis semper suis meminit). Stuart's remark upon this passage is as follows: "The rainbow (Jpi?), around the throne, is an exquisite conception. Such was the splendor of the throne, that the eye could not bear it. It is softened by this beautiful veil cast over the scene." This may, in general, be accepted; but must not be pressed so far as to confuse, with the radi- ance as a whole, the distinctive form of the bow. 4. The Four and Twenty Elders. And round about the throne were four and twenty seats. The word for "seats" is the same as for "throne" in verse 2. We should read accordingly, "four and twenty thrones." The significance of this will appear farther on. — And upon the seats [thrones] I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment. The word "elders" (irpso-^urepoi/s), is a title of dignity. The elders, here, are representative persons, their presence supplying to this group of striking and significant symbols an important element. In studying the import of this feature of the vision, we must bear in mind that what John now sees is introductory to revelations soon to be made to him of the "things which must be hereafter"; the future of the church of Jesus Christ, and of the world itself in its relation thereto. In him who sits upon the throne, the resplendent centre of this august assembly, he sees God, as holy, just, and yet gracious. In the entirety of the vision, as we shall find, representative forms appear, fore- shadowing the forces that will enter into the historical events soon to pass in panoramic succession before the eyes of the seer. Con- spicuous among these are those which repre- sent the church, or kingdom, of Jesus Christ. This is the oiRce assigned in the vision to the occupants of the twenty-four encircling thrones. So far, there seems to be substan- tial agreement amongst interpreters. Upon the question why these representatives of Christ's spiritual kingdom, or church, should be twenty-four in number, opinions differ. Some fanciful reasons are given, which need not be noticed here. A more consistent one supposes an allusion to the twenty-four courses of the Jewish priests, to one of which Zachariah, "of the course of Abia," is spoken of (Luke 1 .-5) as belonging. Grotius assumes — with no evidence to go upon, however — that in the Church at Jerusalem there may have been this number of elders, and that this sup- plies a reason for what appears here. Others take the number as denoting the doubling of that of the original twelve tribes, to indicate the incoming of the Gentiles into the Chris- tian Church. Our own preference is for the view which takes the twenty-four elders as representative of the twelve heads of tribes under the Old Dispensation, and the twelve apostles under the New. How this view stands related to the general theory of interpretation adopted for this portion of the book, together with the special significance of this feature in the vision, we notice more at large in the General Comments below. The "white rai- ment" in which they are "clothed," explained elsewhere (i9:8) as "the righteousness of saints," has no reference to the personal char- acter, of either patriarchs or apostles, but only to the representative character of tliese elders seen in the vision.— And they had on their heads crowns of gold. The white robes Ch. IV.] REVELATION. 79 5 And out of the throne proceeded "lightnings and thunderings and voices: 'and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are "the seven Spirits of (iod. 6 And before the throne there was ''a sea of glass like unto crystal: 'and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before /and behind. 5 garments; and on their heads crowns of gold. And out of the throne proceed lightnings and voices and thunders. And there were seven lamps of tire burn- ing before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of 6 God; and before the throne, as it were a glassy sea like unto crystal ; and in the midst 'of the throne, and round about the throne, four living creatures full of ich. 8:5; 16: 18 6 Ex.27: 23; 2 Chron. 4 : 20 ; Ezek. 1 : 13 : Zech. 4:2 cch. 1 : 4; 3: I; e Ezek. 1:5 / ver. n. 1 Ov, be/ore. e....d Ex. 38:3; ch. 15:2. and the crowns, as Alford justly remarks, show that "these twenty -four elders are not angels," as some have imagined. These are "the rewards of endu7'ance" ; rewards prom- ised, as for example, in chs. 3 : 6 ; 2 : 10. "While representing, in respect of official dig- nity, the spiritual kingdom of God, as com- prehending both Dispensations, the robed and crowned elders represent also in that which they have thus received — the "white raiment" and the "crowns" — that holiness of character and exaltation of condition which are prom- ised to them who are faithful unto death. The thrones in which they sit and the crowns they wear are strictly in accordance with words spoken by our Lord himself in his earthly ministry, and with the whole New Testament representation of the relation which the redeemed hold in that kingdom of grace wherein they stand. They are not as subjects to be ruled, but as participants, as in the struggle, so in the victory and the glory. Observe the "new song" of the four beasts and the elders in ch. 5: 10 — "and hast made us unto our God kings and priests." 5. The Throke and the Lamp.s of Fire. And out of the throne proceedeth lightnings and thunderings and voices. A like manifestation of the divine presence is seen at Exodus 19: 16, where it is said that in the mount upon which God descended "there were thunderings and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon the mount, and the voice of a trumpet, exceeding loud." In Kev. 8: 5, as also 11 : 19, the divine majesty, sover- eignty, and might, seem to be indicated by like tokens. Quite consistently with what is to follow in exhibiting the judgments of God as seen in human history, these terror-striking signs of his presence and power are given. — And there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God. Mention of "the seven Spirits which are before his throne'' has already been made (1 = *). In that place, it seems impossible to understand by the seven Spirits, "seven presence-angels of the highest rank," as is done by Stuart. It is inconceivable that in the words of solemn benediction there used, created beings, of however high a rank, should be associated with "him which is, and which was, and which is to come," and with "Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first- begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth." Angels are never in the Scripture — and never should be anywhere — associated thus with the divine being in hu- man invocation. As in 1 : 4, so here, we must understand by "the seven Spirits of God" the mode of representation adopted for the Holy Spirit himself — mentioned here, how- ever, with reference, not so much to his per- sonality iistoh\soperatio7is. Three things are to be specially noticed: (1) These are lamps— they give light; (2) they are lamps of fire — the element that both purifies and consumes ; (3) they are in number seven — the number of perfection. Taking the lamps, therefore, as symbolizing the Divine Holy Spirit in his operations, we find him set forth in them as enlightening, as purifying, as consuming dross and evil, and as possessing in liis operation, as in his person, divine perfection. 6-8. The Crystal Sea and the Four Living Creatures. 6. And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal. We should read, "And before the throne there was as if (