'i-'M-'--i-.feir-T ,;^:' BR I 165 « .S42 1891 r { f ■ New Testam) BR 165 .S42 1891 Shaw, W. Frank. The Church in the New Testament / THE CHURCH IN THE NEW TESTAMENT BY W. FRANK SHAW, B.D, VICAR OF s. Andrew's, huddersfikld, AND SOMETIME VICAR CF EASTRV ; AUTHOR r.F "the PREACHER's rROMPTUAKY OF ANECDOTE,' •A MANUAL FOR COMMUNICANTS* CLASSES,'* " BIBLE-CLASS NOTES ON S. MATTHEW," ETC. PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE TI!ACT COMMITTrE. LONDON: SOCIETY FOR PROMOTING CHRISTIAN KNOWLEDGE, NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE, W.C.; 43, Q^EEN VICTORIA STREET, E.C. BRIGHTON : 135 North Street. New York: E. & J. B. YOUNG & CO. HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITV PREFACE. The following pages contain the substance of a paper originally read before the members of the Deal and Sandwich Clergy Society in July, 1889. This was subsequently revised and am- plified, once and again. It is now sent forth in the hope that it may contribute somewhat towards the fuller understanding of an important subject largely occupying men's minds at the present time. No pains have been spared to make the refer- ences as accurate as possible. It is perhaps too much to hope that they are all absolutely correct. W. F. S, Hitddersfield, Jan. 22, 1891. THE CHURCH IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, AND ANTERIOR TO IT. The various assaults which are being made in these days upon the authenticity and authority of Holy Scripture will only turn out to the stronger confirmation of the Faith and the furtherance of the Gospel, if they lead to the more attentive consideration of the double basis on which our Faith and Hope stand, viz. the Church of the Living God and the inspired Revelation of His Will. Saying of Chillingworth. It was said by Chilling- worth — and the statement has been reasserted aeain and again (albeit in a sense somewhat different from his original intention), until it has been in- corporated into the popular theology of the day — that tJie Bible and ike Bible only is the Religion of 6 THE CHURCH IN Protestants f^ But surely, if we take the saying in its commonly received acceptation, this is to pro- ^ " Know then, Sir, that when I say the Religion of Protestants is in prudence to be preferred before yours : as on the one side I do not understand by your Religion, the doctrine of Bellarmine, or Baronius, or any other private man amongst you, but that wherein you all agree or profess to agree, the Doctrine of the Council of Trent ; so accordingly on the other side, by the Religion of Protestants, I do not understand the doctrine of Luther or Calvin, or Melancthon ; nor the Confession of Augusta or Geneva, nor the Catechism of Heidelberg, nor the Articles of the Church of England, no, nor the Harmony of Protestant Confessions, but that wherein they all agree, and which they all subscribe with a greater harmony, as a perfect rule of their faith and actions, that is the Bible, the Bible I say, the Bible only is the Religion of Protestants ! Whatsoever else they believe besides it, and the plain irrefragible, indubitable consequences of it, well may they hold it as a matter of opinion, but as a matter of Faith and Religion neither can they with coherence to their own grounds believe it themselves nor require the belief of it of others, without most high and most schismatical presumption." — Chillingworth, The Religion of Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation, Pt. I. chap. vi. § 56. " You proceed : * And whereas the Protestants of England in the Sixth Article have these words, " In the name of the Holy Scripture we do understand those books, of whose authority was never any doubt in the Church,"' you demand 'what they mean by them? whether that by the Church's consent they are assured what Scrip- tures be canonical?' I answer for them, Yes, they are so. And whereas you infer from hence * This is to make the Church judge,' I have told you already that of this controversy we make the Church the judge : but not the present Church, much less the present Roman Church, but the consent and testimony of the ancient and primitive Church . . ." — The Religion of Protestants a Safe Way to Salvation^ ed. 1S66, chap ii. ans. ii. p. 105, § 35. " We will subscribe to St. Austin and say that ' we also would not believe the Gospel, unless the authority of the Catholic Church did move us ' (^meaning by the Church, the Church of all ages and that THE NEW TESTAMENT. 7 test too muchj (for it is utterly to ignore the pro- portion of the Faith, and to claim for the Bible succession of Christians which takes in Christ Himself and His Apostles)." — Id., p. Ill, § 54. " But you that would not have men follow their reason, what would you have them follow ? Their passions ? or pluck out their eyes and go blindfold ? No, you say, you would have them follow authority. On God's name let them ; we also would have them follow authority ; for it is upon the authority of universal tradition that we uiotild have them believe Scripture^ — Id., p. 133, § 114. "I answer: this assertion that * Scripture alone to judge of all controversies in faith,' if it be taken properly, is neither a funda- mental nor unfundamental point of faith, nor no point of faith at all. but a plain falsehood. It is not a judge of controversies, but a rule to judge th(?to by : and that not an absolutely perfect rule, but as perfect as a written rule can be ; which must always need something else, which is either evidently true, or evidently credible, to give attestation to it, and that in this case is universal tradition. So that universal tradition is the rule to Judge all controversies byT — Id., P- 151, § 155- "But you were to prove the Church infallil)]e, not in her traditions — (which we willingly grant if they be as universal as the tradition of the undoubted books of Scripture is, to be as infallible as the Scripture is ; for neither doth being written make the word of God the more infallible, nor being unwritten make it the less infallible) — not therefore in her universal traditions were you to prove the Church infallible, but in all her decrees and definitions of controversies." — Id., chap. iii. ans. iii. p. 197, § 45. *' For that the true Church always shall be the maintainer and teacher of all necessary truth you know we grant and must grant ; for it is of the essence of the Church to be so ; and any company of men were no more a Church without it, than anything can be a man and not be reasonable." — Id., p. 221, § 78. " Now reason will assure him that believes the Creed, tliat it is the will of God he should believe the Scripture ; c\en the very same reason which moves him to believe the Creed ; universal and never-failing tradition having given this testimony both to treed and 8 THE CHURCH IN a position never intended by Him Who gave it unto men ;) it is to lose sight of the fact that Christianity itself was anterior to the New Testament ; that the Church was in existence as a corporate Body and at work in the world, so that the Gospel was being preached, the Sacraments were being administered, and the Faith was being delivered to the saints, for some quarter of a century Scriphtre, that they both by the works of God were sealed and testified to be the words of God." — Id., chap. iv. ans. iv. p. 250, § 13. " The certainty I have of the Creed that it was from«the Apostles and contains the principles of faith, I ground it not upon Scripture, and yet not upon the infallibility of any present, much less of your, Church, but upon the authority of the ancient Church, and written tradition, which (as Dr. Potter hath proved) give this constant testi- mony unto it." — Id., p. 250, § 15. ''For that which you have spoken (though you are loath to speak out) either signifies nothing at all, or that which I and Dr. Potter affirm ; viz. that the Apostles' Creed co?iiains all those points of belief, ivhich were, by God's command, of necessity to be preached to all, and believed by all." — Id., p. 256, § 23. " Now let any man read them with any tolerable indifference, and he shall find they say plainly, that all points of faith, necessary to be particularly believed are explicitly contained in the Creed. . . . The words of Filiucius are pregnant to the same purpose — ' There cannot be a filter rule from whence Christians may learn what they are ex- plicitly to believe than that which is contained in the Creed.' Which words cannot be justified if all points necessary to be believed explicitly be not comprised in it." — Id., p. 257, § 25. Many other passages might be quoted from Chillingworth's writings, but enough are here given to shew that his noted saying has been thoroughly misunderstood, and that he recognised the authority of tradition, and the value of the Creed as well as of the Bible. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 9 before the earliest portion of the New Testament was written^; that "the truth as it is in jESUS" was received by the Holy Apostles from the Lord Himself, not in writing, but byword of mouth, and was brought to their remembrance by the Lord the Holy Ghost ^ and that they handed on to their .successors the Revelation of the New Law which they were to preach among all nations. Hence it is that Irenaeus asks, " What! suppose the Apostles ^ " The Church existed and Christianity existed in the Church for several years before a single line was penned of all that volume of the Sacred Scriptures which is more immediately concerned with the Christian Faith. And when the whole volume of the New Covenant had been written for our learning the Church was still the Witness and the Keeper of Holy Writ." — Dr. Ed. Hawkins, Christianity not the Religion of the Bible only, pp. 14, 15. ** At the early period in the history of Christianity when the Epistle [i Thess.] was written, the Christian society existed with well-defined outlines, (a) No command to cohere into a Church — Btit a Chnrch exists. No command to be baptized — Btit Baptism exists. ' Paul and Silvanus and Timotheus unto the Church of the Thessalonians,' i. I. {b) No command to form a Ministry' — But an authorized Ministry exists. * We beseech you to know them which labour among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; and to esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake,' V. 12, 13. {c) No command to united assemblages — But united assemblages exist ; for at them, or one of them, the Epistle was to be read. ' I charge you by the Lord that this Epistle be read unlo all the holy brethren,' v. 27. {d') No command to celebrate the Holy Communion — But the Holy Communion exists 1 presupposed in the kiss, which must have been public, and was from llie earliest times associated with the Holy Communion)." — Speakers Com. iii. 700. ^ Cf. S. John xiv. 26, xv. 26, xvi. 13, 14 with xii. 16, xx. 9; S. Luke xviii. 34; Acts ii. 4, xi. 16; i Cor. xii. 4-12. lO THE CHURCH IN Jiad not left tis writings^ would it not have been necessary to follow the ti'adition zvhich was delivered by them to those zvho were put in charge of the Churches ^ ? " The Churcli before the New Testament. In short we must never forget that the Church was first formed, and then the New Testament : and it was not until towards the end of the first century that the last portion of the New Testament (whether we take that to be the Apocalypse or the Gospel according to S. John) was committed to writing and the Canon of Scripture closed^. ^ S. Irenseus, Conl. Har., lib. Ill, cap. iv, § i. Bened. ed., p. 178 : " Quid autem si neque Apostoli quidem Scripturas reliquissent nobis, nonne opportebat ordinem sequi Traditionis, quam tradiderunt iis quibus committebant Ecclesias ? " ^ " This book [the N.T.] was not designed to introduce imbe- lievers to Christianity, but to improve the Christian principle of believers. The two great proofs of this position are the institution of the Christian Church and of its ministers, and again the very form of the Christian Scriptures. For observe the form of every one of the books of the N.T, There is not one of them that is not addressed to persons already initiated into the Christian Faith . . . To speak generally, dy the Church we are introduced to the know- ledge of the gospel, by the Scriptures alone m.ust its doctrines be ultimately proved . , ." — Dr. Ed. Hawkins, Christianity not the Religion of the Bible only^ pp. 11,18, The N.T. "consists of Epistles to various Christian converts, in every instance supposing them previously informed of the Christian doctrines, in short always implying previous oral teaching . . . Ample provision for this supply of the want [of oral teaching and authoritative interpretation] was at the first secured by Christ and His Apostles, when they established THE NEW TESTAMENT II The Church herself has decided what is Scrip- ture and put it in our hands. Whilst further it was the Church herself, acting under the guidance and inspiration of the LORD the Holy Ghost, which settled the Canon of the New Testament, and formally declared what was Holy Scripture. Hence we receive the New Testament at the hands of the Church and on her authority^; and S. Augustine, at the Third Council of Carthage (a.d. 397), where a decision was come to on the subject, did not hesitate to say that he should not believe the Gospel nisi Die Ecclesiae comviovcret aiictoriias ^. a perpetual succession of ministers and teachers." — Dr. Hawkins, Z?/j- sertation upon the Use and Importance of U^iaiithoritative Teaching^ pp. 33, etc. *• It seems to have been from the fust the general design of Heaven, that by oral or traditional instruction, the way should be prepared for the reception of the mysteries of the Faith ; that the Church should carry down the system but the Scriptures should furnish all the proofs of the Christian doctrines." — Dr. Hawkins, Dissertation etc., p. 18. "He lays down a proposition, self-evident as soon as stated, to those who have at all examined the structure of Scripture, viz. that the sacred Text was never intended to teach doctrine but only to prove it : and that if we would learn doctrine we must have recourse to the formularies of the Church, for instance, to the Catechism and the Creeds. He considers that after learning ^rom them the doctrines of Christianity the inquirer must verify them by Scripture." — Newman on Hawkins, quoted by Dean Burgon in Lives of Ttvelve Good Men, vol. i. p. 393. ^ Cf. our own xxth Art. : " The Church hath power to decree Rites or Ceremonies, and Authority in controversies of Faith : And . . . [is] a Witness and a Keeper of Holy Writ . . ." '^ S. Aug., Cont. Ep. Fund., c. 5, ed. Migne, vol. 8. p. 176. 12 THE CHURCH IN Thus then our Religion is not the Religion of a Book but of a Person, and our Faith is based upon a Divinely inspired Revelation, interpreted and de- livered unto us by a living Body. Quotation from Bishop Temple. We may perhaps be allowed to quote a recent weighty utterance of the Bishop of London, in his opening address to the London Diocesan Conference, on April 22, 1890 : " Let it always be remembered that although the Bible was the great text-book of religious in- struction of the world, the LORD did not first have the Bible written, and then send forth the Apostles to lecture on it : He sent forth His Church ; He made His Church ; He inspired His Church first ; and that part of the Bible which is most precious came afterwards. He sent forth men to do the work, and He supplied them with the New Testa- ment as a great instrument by which they were to do it ; but it was the instrument, and the Church that He created was the agent to use that instru- ment, and it was altogether inverting the order of instruction which the LORD had given, if they supposed that the instrument was to do the work by itself, or that the agent commissioned by the Lord for the work was simply to stand aside, and have nothing to do with the instruction that was THE NEW TESTAMENT. 1 3 to be given. The great doctrines of the Faith have to be taught, and the Bible is placed in the hands of Churchmen to enable them to teach it." The Church in existence and at work. For it must ever be remembered and kept steadily in view that during all that period, which elapsed from the Day of Pentecost, to the close of the Canon of the New Testament^ — say from the year a.d. ^^ to the year A.D. 98 — the Church was working^, teaching ^ suffering *, growing ^, exercising discipline ^, per- fecting her organization '^, handing on the torch of ^ See table of probable dates of Epistles in Appendix. - Acts ill. 12 ; iv. I ; V. 12 ; vi. 4, 8; viii, 4-8 ; ix. 20, 22, 28, 40; X. 44; xi. 19; xii. 25; xiii. 5, 11, 12; xiv. 26; xv. 12, 41 ; xvi. 4; xvii. 17 ; xviii. 23 ; xix. 8 ; xx. 2 ; xxviii. 8, 9, 23, 30, 31. ^ Acts ii. 42 ; iv. i, 2 ; v. 21, 25, 28, 42; viii. 35 ; xi. 26; xiv. 21, 22; xvi. 4, 13, 32; xvii. 18 1; xviii. 11 ; xix. 8; xx. 20; xxviii. 23, 31- * Acts iv. 3, 21, 20 f. ; V. 18, 26, 27, 40; vi. 12 ; vii. 57-60 ; viii. 3; ix. 2, 23, 24; xii. 1-5; xiii. 50; xiv. 5, 19; xvi. 19-25; xvii. 5, 6, 32 ; xxi. 27, 32, 33; xxii. 24, 25; xxiii. 14; xxvii. 26; Rom. viii. 35> 36 ; I Cor. iv. 9-14; 2 Cor. iv. 8-11 ; xi. 23-28; Phil. i. 13; Col. i. 24; I Thess. i. 6 ; ii. 2, 14, 15 ; 2 Thess. i. 4-7 ; 2 Tim. i. 8, 16; ii. 9, 10; iii. 11, 12; iv. 6, 16; Heb. xiii. 3, 23; i S. Pet. iii. 14-18; iv. 12-18; Rev. i. 9. •'■• Acts ii. 41, 47 ; iv. 4 ; v. 14 ; vi. i, 7 ; viii. 6, 38 ; ix. 31 ; x. 44, 45; xi. 21, 24; xii. 24; xiii. 12,48,49; xiv. 1,21; xvi. 5, 33; xvii. 4, 34 ; xviii. 8, 10 ; xix. 20 ; xxi. 20 ; xxviii. 24. ^ Acts V. 1-12; viii, 20-24; xiii. 9-13; xv. 22-30; 1 Cor. v. 3, 4, 5; xi. 4-17; xiv. 27-31, 34, 40; 2 Cor. ii. 5-9; i Tim. i. 20; v. 9; 2 Tim. iv. 14; Tit. i. 13. ' Acts i. 21-26; vi. 5, 6; viii. 14-17 ; xiii. 2, 3 ; i Cor. ix. i ; 2 Cor. xi. 5; Acts xiv. 23; xv. 6, 19-20; Tit. i. 5. 14 THE CHURCH IN truth from hand to hand, and continuing steadfastly in the Apostles' doctrine (Trj 5t8a)(7y tcov anoaroKdiv) and in the fellowship (rrj KoivcDVia), and in the Break- ing of the Bread (rfj KAdo-et rod aprov) and in the prayers (rat? upocr^vxais) •^. A Creed in use. And there is every reason to believe that even before the formation of the New Testament Canon, there was a Rule of Faith, a Baptismal Creed, a test of orthodoxy embodied in some well-known Form of sound words [vitotv- 7760(719 vyiaivovTbiv Xoyodv, 1 Tim. i. 13), constituting a public Symbol of Faith or Creed to which evident reference is made in the Epistles ^. These hints of Church life undesigned. The Church being thus anterior to the New Testament, and having been at work in the world for so long a period before the completion of the Canon, we shall see that whilst the writings of the Holy Apostles and Evangelists promulgate no Creed, set forth no Liturgy or other offices, enunciate no formal definitions of doctrine, and contain no set * Acts ii. 42. "^ See below, pp. 28, 29, 30; and cf. Speakers Com. iv. p. 374: "In the Second Epistle (of S. John) the idea of a fixed norm of Christian Faith is embodied in The Doctrine by which every teacher was to be tested (2 S. John 9, 10)." THE NEW TESTAMENT. I5 statements relating to the constitution of this Divine Society, the Church, to her powers, privileges, or organization, to her rites, ceremonies, or customs ; they do nevertheless contain numerous allusions, hints, and references to a multitude of matters connected with Church teaching, Church order, and Church life; references which are perfectly amazing in number to the ordinary reader ; but which are of priceless value and importance, and indeed are all the more valuable for our purpose, because they are not so much direct injunctions and commands, as indirect hints, casual quotations, passing allusions to an existing state of things ; in other words, intimations which do not lie upon the surface, but require to be sought out, for the very reason that they are natural and undesigned. Quotation from Bishop John Wordsworth of Salisbury. To use the words of the Bishop of Salisbury, in his Charge delivered in 1888, "Even in the Apostolic age we have evidence that a body of customs and rules was gradually growing up, to which it was considered necessary that obedience should be given without question. The Epistle of S. James, one of the earHest writings of the New Testament, has several hints of this kind. S. Paul's earliest Epistles, those to the Thessalonians, mention 1 6 THE CHURCH IN certain commandments (i Thess. iv. 2) and tra- ditions (2 Thess. ii. 15, iii. 6) delivered by the Apostle, which were clearly not only principles but rules of life, having the force of laws. What ap- pears in those early writings naturally developed in greater detail as time goes on. No doubt the obedience to law is never enforced except as a means to holiness. It is kept quite in a subordinate place, lest there should be a return to Judaism and Pharisaism : but the duty of obedience to Church law and the holding fast to a form of sound words and to a definite system of doctrine is emphasised far more often than most persons seem to think who have not studied the New Testament with a view to this question." But let us now proceed to examine the pages of the New Testament with a view to discover some of these references to the Church as it existed in Apostolic times. And here let us note that though the several links in the chain of evidence may appear weak and inconclusive, when isolated and taken separately; yet regarded collectively, and in the light of history, their cumulative force is weighty and powerful. And that interpretation which as a solitary example seems strained and barely possible, becomes probable in a high degree and well nigh certain when repeated again and THE NEW TESTAMENT. 1 7 again in varying ways. The voice of the individual is inaudible, but the voice of the multitude makes itself heard. Taken alone, each passage is a possibility: as an accumulated mass of passages, their evidence only just falls short of certainty. Possible quotations from liturgical forms. Whilst the New Testament does undoubtedly con- tain references, hints, and allusions to Church doc- trines, practices, and customs, we may also trace in certain passages possible quotations from contem- porary liturgical forms, with which the writers were familiar from their use in the Services of the Church. Conjectural Quotations from Liturgies. Thus in I Cor. ii. 9 some learned writers detect a quota- tion from the Great Oblation in the Liturgy of S. James. True, it is commonly supposed to be a quotation from Isa. Ixiv. 4, but is not exactly so ^ as may be seen on a comparison of the passages. There is hardly a word the same in the LXX Version of the prophet, whilst it agrees almost word for word with the Liturgy. ' " The superficial resemblance to Isaiah Ixiv. 4 vanishes on com- paring the Greek of the LXX with that of the Apostle ;" Ncale, Prim. Litt., p. 79 ; cf. also Neale, Essays on J.ituri^iology, p. 414 et scq., and Luokuck, Divine Liturgy, pp. 3, 4, ist ed. C i8 THE CHURCH IN Isaiahlxiv.4(LXX). Atto tov alciiuos ovK rjKovaaixev, ovde ol o0^aX/ioi TjjjLcov el- 8ov Qeop 7rX/)i' aov, Ka\ TO. epya (rov, a noir}cr€Li toIs virofxe- vovaiv e'Aeov. I Cor. ii. 9. AXXa KaOcos yi- ypaTTTai' A dcpdaX- Hos OVK elde, Ka\ ovs OVK fjKovae, Koi eni Knpdiav dvdpcoTTOv ovk due(3r), a rjToipacrev 6 Qeos To2s uyancoaiv avToi^, Liturgy of S. James. Xapiayj ^plv ra inovpdvia Kai aloiVLa aov doopijpara d 6(f>- 6a\p6s OVK clde Koi ovs ol'K TjKovae, kol enl Kapbiav dvQpanrov OVK dpe^i], d TjToi- paaas 6 Qeos toIs dyaTTcoal cre ^, But as it is writteft, things which eye saw not, and ear heard not, andwJiich e7ite?'ed 7iot i?ito the heart of maji, what- soever thi?tgs God prepared for them that love Him. — R. V. As it is written. But where is it so written? They say, not in the Book of the prophet Isaiah, but in the Liturgy of the Church at Jerusalem, i.e. the Liturgy of S. James. The suggestion is in- teresting and ingenious ; but as the Liturgy of S. James in the form we now have it is on the whole of much later date than the age of the Apostles, and as moreover the same passage occurs in the Liturgy of S. Mark in a wholly different connection, viz. in the Diptychs of the Dead (Hammond, Litt. E. and W., p. 183, xi. f), and the words are wanting in the Prayer of Oblation of the Syriac Liturgy of S. James (Hammond, p. 70, ^ Hammond, Litt. E. and IV., p. 42, cl. pp. ix, x, note; Neale, Fri)ii. Litt., p. 6i. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 1 9 X. a), we can only say that the quotation, though possible, is as yet however " not proven." So again in Heb. x. 19, 20, where some detect a quotation from the Prayer of the Veil in the Liturgy of S. James ^ — Heb. X. 19, 20. "E^^ovTfS, ovv, ddeXcfiul, nap- prjauiv els Tr]v e'laodou t(X)V ayi(i)V iv t(3 aipLari ^Irjuov ^v eveKaiviaep ^]p-i'V obov npoa- (parov Koi ^coaau 6ia tov Kara- TrerdcrfJiaTos, TOvrecrTi rrjs aapKos avTov. Liturgy of S. James (Greek). ILv^^apLCTTOvfMeu aoi, Kupte, 6 Geo? TjfjLUiV, OTC e8(0Kas r]fuu Trap pi](j lav els ttjv e'laodov tu>v ayicou aov, rjv dveKaivicras rjfxiu obop 7rp6a(f)aTOP kul ^coaap dia TOV KaraiveTdarfxaTos rrjs crapKos TOV Xpiarov aov. Having therefore^ brethren^ boldness to enter into the holy place by the Blood of jESUS, by the way zuhich He dedicated for us, a new and living way^ thi'ough the veil) that is to say. His flesh.— K. V. Our knowledge of the earliest form of the ancient Liturgies is as yet too imperfect to assert that either i Cor. ii. 9 or Heb. x. 19, 20 are actual quotations : though it is possible that hereafter they may be proved to be such. Quotations from Hymns. Again, we find in the Apostolic writings several passages which have the appearance of being quotations from Christian ^ Fieldj Apostolic Liturgy, etc., p. 264 ; of. Haiiiinoiid, Litt. E. and IV., p. 39 ; Ncalc, Fri//i. Litt., p. 56. C 2 ao THE CHURCH IN Hymns. Thus in i Cor. xv. 54 we have a passage apparently quoted from a Christian hymn ^ — Tore yevrjaerai 6 Xdyo? 6 ye- ypaiifi€Vos' KaTenodr) 6 3dvaTos ds v2kos. nov (Tou, ddvare, to Kivrpov ; TTOv crov, a8rjf to pikos ; Then shall come to pass the word which is written^ Death Was swallowed up i7i victory, O Death, where is thy sting ? O Hell, where is thy victory f Again, in Ephes. v. 14 we seem to have a fragment from a Hymn on penitence ^ — "Eyeipnt, 6 Kadevdcop, Awake thoii that steepest^ and arise from the dead, ajid Christ shall give thee lioht. Kai avacTTa ex tcov veKpwv, Koi e7ri0aucret crot 6 Xpio-ro?. Again, i Tim. i. 15 is probably a quotation from a Hymn on redemption " — XpiaTos ^Irjcrovs rfK6ev els Tov Koa-piov dp.apTa)Kovs auxTai. Christ Jesus came into the world to save si?iners. Again, i Tim. iii. i may perhaps be taken as a quotation from a Hymn (?) on the pastoral office ^ — ^ Cf. Field, AposL Lit., p. 507. ^ Liddon, Bampton Lectures, p. 328, note u. "Michaelis and others think that they detect fragments of psahns or hymns in Ephes. v. 14; I Tim. iii. i, 16; 2 Tim. ii. 11. And others maintain that many specimens of the Psalms and Hymns of the Early Church occur in the Apocalypse, e.g. in i. 4-8; v. 9 seq. ; xi. 15-19 ; xv. 3, 4; xxi. 1-8; xxii. 10-18;" Riddle, Christian Antiqtcities, p. 342. 3 Liddon, Bajnpton Lectures, p. 327, note u; Smith, Diet, of Christ. Antiq. ii. 1007. * Riddle, Christ. Antiq., p. 3*42. THE NEW TESTAMENT. El Tis CTTtarKonris opeycraij ^ KoXoi) epyov (TiLOvfxel, ai //a ina7i seeketh the office of a BisJiop he desirctJi a good wofk.-K.V . Again, i Tim. iii. i6 is probably a quotation from a Hymn on our Lord's Incarnation and Triumph ^ — Os i(f)av€pfi(6a kut eXnlda ^arjs alcoviov, * Liddon, BaiJipton Lectures, p. 328, note u ; Riddle, Christian Antiquities, p. 342 ; Smith, Diet, of Christ. Antiq. ii. 1007. ' Liddon, Bampion Lectures, p. 328, note u : who refers to Keble's Ser77ions Acad, and Occ, p. 183. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 2^ BtU when the kindness of GOD Piir Saviour, and His love toiva7'd man, appeared^ not by woj-ks done In righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according to His mc7'cy He saved us, ih?-ough the washing of regetieration and renewing of the Holy Ghost, which He poured out up07i us richly, through jESUS Christ our Saviour J that, beijig justified by His grace, we might be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.-K. V. Quotations from Doxologies. The following would seem to be quotations from Doxologies, Thus in Rom. ix. 5 we have — O wv enl ndvTou Qeos evXoyrjTos els Tovs alcovas. Ajj-tju. Who is over all God blessed forever. Amen"^, Again, in Rom. xi, 36 we have another Dox- ology— els TOVS aliovas. Afirjv. To Him be the glory for ever. A?nen'^, Again, in Rom. xvi. 27 we have — Moved aocpcp ©fo), To the only wise God 8ia 'Itjctov XptoToO, through jESUS Christ, [o)] T] ho^a els TOVS ala>vas. *Afj.T]v. [to IVhom] be the glory for ever. Amoi"^. * Liddon, Batnpton Lectures, p. 328, note x. ' Cf. Didachc, ix. 3, 4; x. 2, 4 : Apost. Cotistt. ii. 14. ^ Liddon, Bampton Lectures, p. 328, note x; cf. Didache, ix. 3, 4 ; X. 2, 4. 24 THE CHURCH IN Again, in Phil. iv. 20 we have — Tcp de Gfo) Kal nuTfU ijfxcov 17 86^a els Tovs aloivas tujv aloivcov. 'A/uj}i/. Nouitmtooiir God and Father be the glory for ever and ever. Amen. Again, in 2 Tim. iv. 18 and Heb. xiii. 21 we have another Doxology — 'Q, -q bo^a els tovs nla>vas Ta>v ala)Pa>v, *AfirjV. To Whom be the glory for ever a?id ever. Amen. Again, in S. Matt. vi. 13 we have a Doxology which is almost certainly a quotation from a Litur- gical form then in use — Ort (Tov ecTTtp rj /SacrtXeia Kal rj dvvajjiis Koi t] do^a els TOVS al6)vas. ^Afxrjv. For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory for ever. Aj?ten. It is quite true that these words are omitted in many critical editions of the Greek Testament, but as the Revised Version itself admits, it is found in ■' many authorities, some ancient." Besides, the pre- sence of this Doxology in the Didache would seem to indicate its contemporary use in the Church at a time when S. Matthew's Gospel was being written. In the Didache {ym. 2) it runs thus — On (TOV idTiv J) bvpa/jLis Kal f) do^a els tovs alcouas^. For Thine is the power afid the glory for ever. ^ We may compare this with other Doxologies {Didache, ix. 2, 3, 4; X. 2, 4. 5) in that "oldest Church Manual" extant, wliich has been assigned (Luckock, Div. Lit. p. 29 and note ; De Romestin, The Teaching- of the XII Apostles, p. 6) to the last quarter of the THE NEW TESTAMENT. 25 And for some further examples of Doxologies. cf. J Tim. vi. 16; 1 S. Pet. iv. 11, v. 1 j ; S. Jude 2.5 ; Rev. i. 6, v. 13. Quotations from Benedictions. The following may not improbably be quotations from Benedic- tions used at the conclusion of a Service — O Se Qeos Tijs elpr]vrjs (JLCTCi ■navTOiV vfxwu. 'A/Mf)i/. O Qeos Trjs aydnrjs /cat eifjijvrjs 'icTTai fx€$^ vfiayv. AvTos 8e 6 Oeos Tr]s elpT]pr]s dyidcrai vfxds oXoreXfiy. AvTOS Si 6 Kvpios Trjs elprjvrjs 8u)T] vfilv rrjv dprjvijv dia The God of peace be with you all. Amen. Rom. XV. '})'3). The God of love and peace shall be zuilh you. 2 Cor. xiii. 11. And the God of peace Himself sanctify yoic wholly. I Thess. V. 23. A7tdtheLordof peace Himself give you peace always in every place. 2 Thess. iii. 16. Me?'cy tint you and peace a)id love be multiplied. S. Jude 2. Quotations from the Creed. Again, whilst the Acts of the Apostles and the Apostolic writings are first century, say a.d. 70 to a.d. 100, and ic perhaps earlier than some of the writings of the N.T. For this Doxology see also Apost. Cons it. vii. 24. ^ Text. Rec. reads t/j/'Tto^ ; but Lnchniaiin reads totto), and \ uls^. has in omni loco, and this seems more likely to have been the form of the Benediction. TxavTos €U iravTL tottco €os vpuv Kal elprjVT] 'EX KOL dyaTir} nXTjOvvdeiT], 26 THE CHURCH IN studded with references to the early Creed, there are also other passages which may well be taken as quotations from it ^ S. James (ii. 19) would seem to be referring to the recitation of the Creed in the assemblies of the faithful when he says — 2u Tnareveis on et? Geoy ecrriv . T^ou believest that the7'e is one God. Again, S. Paul in his First Epistle to the Corin- thians (viii. 6) sa.ys — Etff Beoy o nnrrjpy e^ ov TO. navra, Koi Tjfiels eh avTOV, Kai els Kvpioslrjo-ovs XpicTOSy 81 ov TO. ndvTaf Ka\ rjjjiels 8i avTOv. There is 07te God the Father^ Of Whom are all things, And we unto Him, And 07ie Lord jESUS Christ, Through Whom are all things, And we throiiQ-h Him '. %b' Again, in his speech to the people at Lystra (Acts xiv. 15) S. Paul spake to them of TJie Livmg God — ^O? €Troir](T€ top ovpavov koi ttjp jtjv Kcu rrjv OaKao-aav Ka\ jravra to. eV nvTols , Who made the heaven and the earth, and the sea and all that in them is. * The Confession of the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts viii. 37 is not given in the best critical editions of the Greek Text. ^ Such is the reading of Tr viarg., WH text. ^ Maclear, Introd. to the Creeds, p. 7. * Cf. the Creed of Irenmis, a.d. 180 (given by Dr. Maclear in his Introduction to the Creeds, p. 300), which has a clause agreeing almost word for word with this. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 27 Writing to Timothy (t Tim. vi. 13) he says, / charge thee befoi'e God Who qtnckeiieth all things — Kai \r](TO\) Xpiarov tou fxapTvprjcravTOS eVt UovTiov TliXaTOV rrjv koXtju OfioXoyiav, And Jesus Christ Who witnessed before Pontius Pilate the good co7ifession. And in his First Epistle to the Corinthians (xv. 3, 4, 5), after giving an outline of the Faith which he had taught, S. Paul goes on to say, / delivered unto yotc first of all that zvhich I also received^ how that — Hpiaros mredavev vrrep tcov afxapTLcbv Tjfxa>v' Kara ray ypa(f)d5' Ka\ oTi irdcfir)' Koi on eyrj-y^prat ttj rjpepg. T.7 Tpirr] Kara ras ypa(f)ds. Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures : and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures ^. Again, S. Peter in his First Epistle (iii. 22) having referred to the Resurrection of jESUS Christy goes on to say — ^0vTis re Kar' oIkov aprov) ^, re- ^ S. Matt, xxviii. 20. * Acts i. 3. ^ S. John XX. 19; Acts i. 13, 14; ii. i, 42, 46; v. 12. * Acts iv. 23; cf. xxiv. 23. ^ Acts iv. 24 ; cf. Rom. xv. 6 : and note how constantly this word dfioOvfxaSov occurs in the early history of the Church, Acts i. 14 ; ii. i, 46 ; iv. 24 ; V. 12 ; viii. 6 ; xv. 25 j because the faithful were all " of one heart and of one soul " (Acts iv. 32). ^ Acts iv. 24-32. ^ S.Luke xxiv. 53 ; Acts ii. 42 1, 46; iii. I. ® Acts ii. 46 ; cf. v. 42. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 3I sorting to a particular part of the Temple^, assem- bling together for prayer and intercession ^ meeting together in Council to discuss questions of Church order ^, to receive reports *, and to hear letters ^. Names. We find the disciples separated from the ordinary multitude of Jews and heathen ^, and when referred to as a Body spoken of as — T] €KK\r](Tia, the Church, Acts viii. 3 ; ix. 31 ; xi. 26 ; xii. i, 5 ; XV. 4 ; XX. 18 ; l Cor. vi. 4 ; xii. 28 ; or x] fKKXrjala tov GeoO, fhe Church of God, Acts xx. 28; I Cor. i. 2 ; x. 32 ; xi. 22 j xv. 9 ; 2 Cor. i. i ; Gal. i. 13 ; I Tim. iii. 15 ; or okt] T] €KK\rj(r[a, the luJiole Church, Acts v. 1 1 ; xv. 22 ; Rom. xvi. 23 ; i Cor. xiv. 23 ; or at iKKkr^aicu, the Churches, Acts xvi. 5 ; Rom. xvi. 4 ; or aX €KKXr]aLaL Trdaai, all the Churches, i Cor, vii. 17 ; 2 Cor. xi. 28 ; or aX iKK\i]aiai tov Oeov, the CJiurcJies of God, I Cor. xi. 16 ; I Thess. ii. 14 ; or aX €KK\rjcrl.ai naaai tov XpiaTov, all the Churches of Christ, Rom. xvi. 16 ; or Tiacrai al eKKXrjaiai Tfuj' dyicov, all the Churches of the samts, I Cor. xiv. 33 ; or ^ Acts V. 12 ; cf. iii. 11. 2 Acts i. 14; iv. 24 ; xii. 5, 12. ' Acts XV. 6, 25. * Acts xiv. 27; XV. 4 ; xxi. 17, iS, 19, 22. * Acts XV. 30 ; Col. iv. 16. ^ Acts ix. 26-29; xix. 9. ^2, THE CHURCH IN the Church or churches of some particular place, as l/ie Church at Jerusalem, Acts viii. i ; xi. 22. the Church at Antioch, Acts xiii. i. the Church at Corinth, i Cor. i. 2. the Churches o/Galatia, i Cor. xvi. i. the Churches 0/ Asia, i Cor. xvi. 19 ; etc. or called the brethren \ or the disciples ^, or those of the Way^, or the Nazarenes^, or Christians^, and further " the early Christians were instinctively designated by themselves and others as those who habitually call upon the Name of the Lord (Acts ix. 14, 21 ; xxii. 16; Rom. x. 1%, 13, 14; i Cor. i. 2 ; 1 Tim. ii. 22)," Speaker s Coin. iii. p. 69.1, note I. Assembling together. We find them assem- bling — for worship. Acts xx. 7 ; i Cor. xi. 17, 18, 20 ; xiv. 23, 26 ; for instruction. Acts xi. 26 ; for discipline, i Cor. v. 4. ^ S. John xxi, 23 ; Acts i. 15 ; var. read.) ; ix. 30 ; x, 23 ; xi. i, 29 ; xii. 17 ; XV. 3, 22, 23, 36 ; xvi, 2, 40 ; xvii. 6, 14; xviii. iS, 27, etc. : and see p. 54, note i below. •^ Acts i. 15 ; vi. i, 7 ; ix. i iji. tov Kvpiov), 25, 38; xi. 29; xiii. 52; xviii. 27 ; xix. 2 ; xx. i, 7. ^ Acts ix. 2 ; xix. 9, 23 ; xxiv. 22 ; cf. xviii. 25, 26 ; xxii. 4 ; xxiv. 14, * Acts xxiv. 5, and cf. S. Malt. ii. 23. •"' Acts xi. 26; xxvi. 28 ; I S. Pet. iv. 16. Cf. S. Ign. ad Magnes. iv, ad Rom. iii ; and the words of Tacitus {Ann. xv. 44), " Quos . . . vulgus Christianos appellabat," " the common people called them Christians." THE NEW TESTAMENT. 33 And the stated assembling of the faithful is spoken of as ^' your assembly " (?/ avraycoyi} vixGtv) \ or " the assembling of yourselves together " (^ k-niavvayoiyi] iavTO)v) '^, or the being " in Church " {ev iKKXrjo-ia) ^. They assemble on t/ie first day of the ivcck ^, which is also the eighth ^ and was always regarded in the Church as a commemoration of our Lord's Resurrection^. Hence it is called the Lord s Day"'. On this day the Christians meet together — i. to break the Bread (Acts xx. 7, 11 ; and cf. ii. 42, Didache, xiv. i), and hence it is called by S. Chryso- stom " the day of Bread " ; ii. to pray (cf. Acts ii. 42 ; Rom. xii. 12 ; i Tim. ii. i, 8) ; iii. to hear the reading of Holy Scripture (cf. Acts xiii. 15, 27 ; XV. 21 ; S. Luke iv. 16, 17 ; i Thess. v. 27 ; Coh iv. 16) ^ ; iv. to give ahns (i Cor. xvi, 2). ^ S. Jas. ii. 2. ^ Heb. X. 25 ; cf. Didachc, xvi. 2, ttvkvois 5^ ffvvaxOTjafaOf," But be ye frequently gathered together." S. Clemens, i ad Cor. xxxiv; S. Ignat. ad Ephes. v, xiii, xx ; ad Magnes. iii, vii ; ad Polyc. iv. ^ I Cor. xi. i8 ; xiv. 19, 28, 35; and cf. the phrase "in chapter" for the assembling of a cathedral body. * S. John XX. 19 ; Acts xx. 7 ; i Cor. xvi. 2. ' S. John XX. 26. " Cf. Maclear, Evid. Val. of the Lord's Day, R. T. S.. passim, and Martigny s.v. Dimanche. ~ Rev. i. 10, €yivo/j.r)v kv Tn'ti'/iart h' rrj /cvpiaicrj iji-Upa. ; cf. Didachi, xiv. I ; S. Ignat. ad Magnes. ix. " The order in which the various books of the N.T. were written and given to the Church may perhaps be gathered from the Apo- stolical Constitutions (ii. 57) which direct the reading of two Lessons D 34 THE CHURCH IN The Holy Eucharist. Early in the history of the Church we find the disciples obeying the Lord's command Tliis do for My Memorial (S. Luke xxii. 19), TJiis do for a Memorial of Me (i Cor. xi. 24), and " continuing steadfastly in the Apostles' doc- trine, and fellowship, and in the Breaking of the Bread ^ and in the Prayers." And to their un- varying obedience in this matter, and constant cele- bration of that which is variously termed T] Kkaa-Ls Tov ciprov ^, the B7'eaking of the Breads S. Luke xxiv. 35; Acts ii. 42, 46; xx. 7, li; cf. xxvii. 35; I Cor. x. 16, 17 ; xi. 24; T] \eLTovpyia the Liturgy, Acts xiii. 2 ; cf. Phil. ii. 17 ; TO. fivaTr]pia tov Qeov, the Mysteries of God, i Cor. iv. i ; 17 €vxapi-crTLa^, the Eucharist, i Cor. xiv. 16 ; I Tim. ii. i, we find many incidental allusions, thus: — Acts ii. 42, They continued daily with one accord in the Temple^, i.e. they went up at the third, the sixth, and the ninth hours (Acts iii. i) to join in the Temple prayers ^ — and broke the Bread at home, i.e. at the home or head-quarters of the Church, even from the O.T, and from the Prophets, the antiphonal singing of the Psalms, and the reading of the Acts, the Epistles of S. Paul, and the Gospels, Cf. Speaker's Comm. iii. 699, 683; iv. 437, for this public reading of Scripture. ^ TT) KXna€i TOV dpTov, Acts ii. 42. ^ Cf. S. Ignat. ad Ephes. xx. ' Q-i.Didache, ix. i, 5 ; S. Ignat. ad Ephes. xiii, ad Philad. iv, ad Sniyr. vii, viii, Justin Mart*- i. * Cf. S. Luke xxiv. 53. • S. Luke 1. 10. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 35 that Upper Chamber in which the Lord had first instituted the Holy Eucharist, where He had ap- peared to the disciples after His Resurrection, where they continued in prayer during the Ten Days of Expectation, where the Holy Ghost came down upon them, where the seven deacons were elected and ordained (Acts vi), and where the first Council of Jerusalem was held (Acts xv), and where S. Peter preached his first sermon ^. Acts xiii. 2, And whilst they were celebrating the Liturgy to the Lord and fasti?ig, the Holy Ghost spake to them and commanded the ordination of Barnabas and Saul. Acts XX. "], And upon the first day of the zveek, when the disciples came together to break Bread. Paid preached tmto them, ready to depart on tJu morrow ; ajid coniimied his speech until midnight. The Jewish day began in the evening, and the beginning of the Lord's Day, the first day of the week, would be on what we should call Saturday nights S. Paul's sermon lasted till midnight, next came the death and restoration to life of the young ' '' Which place was afterwards enclosed with a goodly Church called the Church of Mount Sion, and the Upper Church of the Apostles in the time of Cyril bishop of Jerusalem and S. Jerome." Bingham, Antiq. viii, c. i. 2 Kiug Wiht reefs Dooms Ecclcsiastiial (.\.i). ^196 , No. 10 decrees : " If any one that is a slave does any servile work at his master's command on the Sunday evening [i.e. Saturday night] after the D 2 GfCd eVcOTTlOJ/ TTaVTOiV. ^6 THE CHURCH IN man Eutychus, then the Apostle returned to the Upper Chamber, so that it was probably early morning when he broke the Bread (KAao-aj yhv apTov)^ of the Holy Eucharist : and then, service over, he took food (yevcraiJLevos) and went on his journey. Again, it is the opinion of Tertullian, in which he is followed by Newman, that the incident which occurred on S. Pauls voyage to Rome, when after a fortnight's stormy weather, during which the little company had "taken nothing," the Apostle ad- dressed them at daybreak and then — taking B7'e ad he offered the Eucharist to God before them alt, is to be regarded as a Celebration of the Holy Eucharist ^. going down of the sun, till before the going down of the sun on Monday evening [i.e. Sunday night] let the master make satis- faction with eighty shillings : " upon which Johnson {^English Canons) comments thus, •' Sunday evening here signifies what we now call Saturday evening, and Monday evening what we now call Sunday evening." Elfrics Canons (a.d. 957), No. 37 '' . . . let the feast of Sunday be kept from Saturday noon till Monday's light." King Edgars Laws Ecclesiastical (A.D. 95S), No. 5 : ''^Let every .Sunday be kept in a festival manner from the noontide on Saturday till Monday morning light." "Noontide,'* says Johnson, "is three in the afternoon according to our present account : and this practice I conceive continued down to the Reformation." Johnson, Eng. Canons, vol. i. pp. 146, 406, 410. ^ Acts XX. 11; this is the reading of LT Tr WHR. - Acts xxvii. 35 : Tertullian {de Orat. xxiv) ; and Newman, Par. and Plain Scrm., iii. p. 2,:^3, " he acted as their Priest, giving thanks to God and breaking bread in tiie presence of them all." THE NEW TESTAMENT. 37 In S. Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians, written about A.D. 57, he refers to the Celebration of the Eucharist^ and the people's response Amen, in these words — 'Ettci iav (vXoyfjCTTjs rc5 nvev- fxciTL, o (ipan\r]p(ii)V tqv runnv TOV IdlCOTOV TTOJ? fpet TO UjJLqV 6771 TTj crij evxapLCTTLa, eneidrj ri \eyeis ovk otSe ; Else when iJiou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he who Jilleth the place of the layman say the Amen at thy Eucharist, seei?ig he knoweth not what thou say est ? ^ Eucharistie references and allusions. The words when thon s/ialt bless (eTret kav ^vKoyijcnjs) have undoubtedly a Eucharistie meaning, especially when taken in connection with those foregoing words of this same Epistle (i Cor. x. 16, 17) ; and l/ie Amen here referred to is "the great Amen/' or "the tremendous Amen" at the end of the Prayer of Consecration, to which Justin Martyr- refers in his first Apology. Again, whilst frankly acknowledging the generic use of the word evxapiaria in the New Testament, we would also claim for it, in many passages, a particular and specific sense. Thus in his First ^ I Cor. xiv. 16. '^ **' And when he has conchuled the prayers and thanksgivings all the people present shout assent enfvcpTjfiu), saying .Imen. This word Amen answers in tlie Ileljrew tongue to ytpoiro — so be it." Just. Mart. i. 67. Cf. Apost. Constt. viii. 5, 4. p. Kj; ; Cyiill. liicr,, Cat. Myst., v. 18, 21, 2a. 38 THE CHURCH IN Epistle to Timothy (i Tim. ii. i, 2) the Apostle directs that •' supplications, prayers, intercessions, and EiicJiarists be made for all men ; for kings and for all that are in authority," where the word Eucharists ^ seems a better rendering of the Greek ^vyapKTTia'i than rw^x^ giving of thanks. The Chris- tians could hardly offer thanksgiving to God for such a monster as the reigning Emperor Nero ; but they could offer Eucharists to God on his behalf: "services, that is, in which though thanks- giving formed an important element, yet a still more prominent part was the intercession for foes as well as friends^." And further mention is apparently made of the Christian Altar (Heb. xiii. 10) or Table of the Lord ^ Cf. Liddon, A Father in Christ, 4th ed., p. 23. And in a MS. letter to the writer, dated 29 May, 18S9, Dr. Liddon says, "The word ivxapioTLai is of course wider in its range than the concrete and supreme act of thanksgiving which is associated with the Holy Sacrament. It includes all thanksgivings ; but this, surely and pre- eminently, among or above the rest, as the highest and most acceptable of all. The use of the plural too is significant, it points to definite acts of thanksgiving — of which the Holy Eucharist would be the most natural — as distinct from the general spirit or temper of thanksgiving. At the same time we should not deny that hfii]a(^iSy npoaevxai, and iVT€v^€is have their place in association with the Holy Sacrament, as in the intercessory parts of the ancient Canon, or our own Church Militant Prayer. What is historically certain is, that they have not given their name to the Sacrament, from which they are no doubt inseparable." ^ Luckock, Div. Litur.,p. ^S. THE NEW TESTAMENT. 39 (i Cor. X. 21) : and in the one case it is laid down that Christians cannot partake of the Lord's Table and the Table of devils, and in the other that "those who serve the Tabernacle," i.e. JewS; have no right to partake of the Christian altar. And in Rom. xv. 16 and Phil. ii. 17 the Apostle speaks, of himself and of his work as a minister of Christ, in liturgical terms, which would have their full meaning only to those acquainted with the Eucharistic service. Accordingly Professor Godet, commenting on Rom. xv. 16, says: "In this case the function involved is nothing less than presenting to God the Gentile w^orld as an offering which may be acceptable to Him. This world-wide service to which Christ Himself had called S. Paul was not only that of a preacher, it had a priestly character/' Kiss of Peace. Again, there is a custom, at first general and promiscuous but early restricted to those of the same sex, and intimately con- nected with the celebration of the Holy Eucharist, of which we find mention made in the Epistles of S. Peter and S. Paul \ viz. the " holy kiss " or " kiss of peace " (c/;tA?/jua ayiovy ^iA?;juta aydTT)]^). ^ Rom. xvi. 16 ; i Cor. xvi. 20 ; 2 Cor. xiii. 12 ; i Thess. v. 26 ; I S. Pet. V. 14; cf. Acts XX. 37, and Speakers Commen. iii. pp. 699, 700. 40 THE CHURCH IN Again, when the Apostle bids them "salute (aa-ira- o-acr^e) every saint in Christ Jesus" (Phil. iv. 21) he is doubtless referring to the public salutation with the kiss of peace, and so Col. iv. 1^, Heb. xiii. 24^. S. John (i Ep. iv. 7) says, "Beloved, let us love one another" {ayaircoix^v) -, and it is noticeable that the modern form for bidding the kiss of peace in the Orthodox Eastern Church is " let us love {ayairrja-odiiev)'-^ one another." We learn from Justin Martyr that this was practised by the Christians in his time (fl. A.D. 140) before the celebration^: to this TertuUian * refers as signaciihivi pads, and asks, " What prayer is complete from which the holy kiss is divorced ? " Concerning this S. Cyril of Jerusalem says: "This kiss blends souls one with another, and solicits for them entire forgiveness. Therefore this kiss is the sign that our souls are * Cf. Hammond, Litt. E. and IV., pp. 178, 205, 254, etc. ^ Cf. Hammond, LzU. E. and IV., pp. 34, 105, 151. And surely it is worthy of remark that Origen (^quoted by Wordsworth and Maclear in loco) interprets Ti-^a-nr}