\% Hp» .^sf ^^y a^nu^/ Cûny OJ^/T , D^vlsioa T^L- Secrttoa M M 1 f ^ i ! ^ ! ' •■Cr 1 ^ i >>V 1 *^ d i ^-N- - 3 -^ i 1 s^ ^ lli ' "^ c ^ 5 CO w o • — , « &H 3 -^ g <-t- O ;^' ^ 5^ *^*-* "5 o O ^* v* % V* 1 ^ 1 ^V>{8! T hî: JEWISH SPY: BEING A Philosophical, Historical and Critical Correjpondence^ By letters Which lately pafs*d between certain JEIVS in Turkey^ Ital)\ France^ Spain^ (^c, Tranflated from the Originals into French^ By^the Ma r (^u i s D'A R G E N S ; And 7J0W done into Englifh. VOL. IV. L O N D O N: Printed for D.Browne, at the B/a:i S^van v.lxh^ cut Te^^ple-Bari and R. Hett, at x\\^. BibU 'Àa4 Croi.t:n in the Poultry. M. DCC. XL. D ED I CATION, v tice refafe the Lettres "Juives that gencrou'^ Affiftance which I earncflly implore lor them; and in the jufl: Confidence I have of obtaining from you this Favour, I ic- main with the profoundell Refped^ LsCOMI'ARABrE KniGUT, 7\ur moft Hunùle^ and mojl Obedient Sirvant, M. D. PREFACE. JUST as ï haft finifîied this fourth Vo- lume, I received from Amfierdam the twenty-third Tome of the Bibliothèque Francoife\ in which I found a Letter, wherein, under colour of fetting forth the State of the Sciences in Spain^ there is a warm Declamation againft a certain Work, riot mention'd indeed, but fo plainly defcrib'd, that one may eafily fee it means the Jewijh Letters. I refolved at firft to make no anfwer to this Critique, the Author of which pafTes in the Eye of the World, as well as in the Repub- lick of Letters, for a kind of Madman, and a perfeél Copy of the famous Don Quixote, In reality, 'ds well known, he is as romanti- cally fond of the Spaniffo Nation as the Hero of La Mancha w\'is of his incomparable Dul- cinea. I did not therefore look upon myfelf as obliged to take notice of the Objections of fuch a Perfon \ and I fhould liave held m.y firft Refolution if I had not afterwards refledied, that this impertinent Letter being inferred in a Journal, wherein we fom.etimes mxet v/ith ufeful and curious Pieces, many Readers might be perfuaded the Criticifm came from the Jour- nalifts themfelves. I will therefore juft point out TO THEJl >i i Valiant and Magnanimous Don QUIXOTE De la Mancha, Invincible Knight of the LIONS, ^c. &c. ^c. ILluftrlous Hero of CervanfeSy not to be parallell'd for the Deftruc- ^^ tion of Sheep and Puppets, cou- ragious and intrepid Aflailant of Wind-Mills and FuUing-Mills, perpetual Terror of the Catchpoles of the Holy Bro- therhood ^, &c. (s'c, permit me to put under your powerful Protection this Fourth * La Santa Hermando.d^ as it is called in the Origi- nal, is a Brotherhood of long Handing in ^/(^/«j where it was firll inilituted in a Time of very great Confufion, to fupprefs Robbers: by which means 'tis fafe travelling in this Country, the Fraternity being fpread all over the Kingdom. 1 heir Beadles or Serjeants to apprehend fuch Offenders are called Jlgnazih. A 2 Volume iv' DEDICATION. Volume of the Lettres Juhes. A certain crack-brain'd Knight, to the full as mad and as extravagant as yourfelf, hath refolv'd upon their Ruin, and vovv'd their Deftruc- tion. In vain does the Public think to 'fave them from his Fury. He offers bat- tle to the whole Univerfe, and boafts that he will reduce them to atoms, maugre the Protedion of all Enchanters. In this ex- treme Diflrefs permit me to fly to you for Succour; come, O wroDg-hended Knight, oppofe Folly to Folly: humble your Rival, the infolent Knight of Iberia, and after laying him flat on the Ground, compel him to confefs that he has no Title to the Privilege of being h extravagant as you. Coiifidering how long he has pretended to vye with you for the Scepter or Bawble of Momus^ your Jealoufy might juftly be in- tlarn d at his Impertinence and Folly; yet you ftill fufter him to enjoy his Reputation in Peace. But confider that Glory calls you forth to Battle, and that even your Profeffion demands you fhould exert your ielf. You are bound by the Laws of Knight-Errantry to redrefs Grievances, to Lcomfort the Afflicled, and to proted: the OpprelTed. You cannot therefore in Juf- tice PREFACE. vii out a few of the many Blunders in that ridi- culous Piece. This Knight of Iberia undertakes at once the Defence of all the Authors who have been criticized in the Jewijh Letters. He ougl;t to be pardon'd for relenting the Affront put upon them, becaufe a good part of it falls to his own Share ; and he appeals to the PabJick againft the Injuilice which he imagines to have been done to him. He treats as Blockheads^ fays he, Men of Learnings who have put it in the power of the Puhlick to judge of their E- rudition. To this I anfwer, that there can be nothing fo falfe ; and I defy him to name an Author, worthy of Efteem, whom I have not commended. Des Cartes., Gafendi, Bernier, M^ll^branchey Bayle^ Locke^ s^Gravefande., Vi- triarius., Boerhaave^ De Thou^ Daniel, Pafcal^ Sirmond, Petau^Lamy: inihort, all the Learn- ed, of whatever Country, whatfoever Condi- tion, or whatever Religion they are of, Ca- tholics or Proteftants, Jefuits or Janfenifts, they were all one to me. Wherever I difco- ver*d Merit, I have not fcrupled to own it. I have been equally juft to the Authors of Works relating to Poetry and Romances: I have com- mended Corfieille, Racine., Milton., Pope., Pe- trarch., Tajfo, Guarini, Don Lopez de Fega, Cervantes., Cre billon., Voltaire., Rouffeau, It is true, that even at the time I allow'd the lafb to have Wit, I denied him fomewhat ^\{^^ A4., which viii PREFACE. ' wlîich I thought I both might and ought to do, fince it was taken from him by a Iblemn Arret of the firfl Padiament of France. Thofe J have mentioned are all good Authors ; and for their Works I fhall ever have the highefl Eileem. Where then are the Writers 1 have treated as Blockheads! ivho had neverthelefs given the Ptihlick an opportunity of judging of their Erudition? I fancy the Critick had a inind to point out himfeif But how entred it into his Brain that his copying three Pages from Moreri^s Didlionary, and three more from the Diclionary of Corneille^ and connecting tiiem with Scraps from other Booksy and with his Pillage from Baudrand., whofe Diclionary he has almoft robb'd of every Word; how could he think, I fay, that this would give ^lim the Title and Character of a Man of Learning ? I proceed to other Complaints : // is afionifhing^ fays this Critick, that a Terfon of Birth^ Education^ Wit^ Fortune^ end honourable Em-ployments^ fhould quit all^ and take up the mean Employment of an Author, Thefe Praifes beftow'd upon me are only Gar- lands to aclorn tlie Vi6tim. ; and I am railed to this height purely to be tumbled down from it. B;:fore I leave this Article I mull and will fay it, that tho' it v/ere tiur, that Fortune had placed me in a fplendicl Condition, there is nothing fhameful in my cviitting it, in order to abandon mvfclf ciuircly lo Phiiofophy, and to PRE FACE. ix to enjoy that fweet Satisfadion which refults from the Cultivation of the Sciences. "Were the Works of i^^<:i?^/^//^^/^/, Montaigne^ Mal- herbe^ Racan^ or Buffi Rahutin ever objecled to them as a Crime? The famous Cardinal Richelieu was as zealous for having the Re- putation of an Author as he was for the De- llrudion of Spain. This Critick, no doubt, defpifes the Cardinal, and thinks him much to blame. But to proceed to his Reproaches. He ranges me in the Clafs of thofe Liber- tine Writers who fet Pen to Paper for no o- ther end but to run dov/n Religion, Virtue, Knowledge, and Merit* As to Virtue and Religion, I have in the Prefaces to the firll and fécond Volumes of this Work made it clearly enough appear, that none but a perfed Slanderer could be guilty of fuch Language : And - as to the fmall Refpe6l he fays I have fhewn towards the truly Learned, I have juft explained my felf on that head. If, indeed, the Critick is really a learned Man, then \ own I have done wrong to condemn his Works i but this is a Point which I leave to tiie Decificn of the Publick. As this Cenfurer hath not thought proper to enter into any Detail, but only runs out into general Invedives againil me, .while he com- mends exceflively a number of miferable Au- thors, it's impoffible I fhould anfwer him as to tiie Fauits he may find in this Book. B<:fore As 1 K PREFACE. I conclude this Preface, therefore, I will exa* mine fome of the Praife of which he has been fo lavifh on the Spanijh \Vriters-, and I fhall evidently demonftrate, that they are a hundred times more hurt by his Compliments than they could have been by the moil abufive Criticifm. One may well apply to himi, in this Cafe, the fine Paffage in Tacitm: Peffimum Inimicorum Genus Laudantes. Our Critick begins by eilablifhing the Goodnefs, Beauty, and Deli(!acy of the Spa- nifi) Genius on xkit Works of St. 'Terefa^ Lewis of Granada^ and the Reverend Father Rodri- guez-, and he even proceeds to infult me by queilioning whether I know thofe Books : I dare fay, they are as well known to me as to him, tho* I value them much lefs; efpecially Rodriguez^ of whofe writing I have read fome very bad Books, very meanly tranflated, and fo generally contemn'd, that Molière was not afraid ,tp -^ridicule them in one of his Pieces» I am aftonifh'd the Cridck did not know diis Line: She read Rodriguez, and us'd mental Prayer, Perhaps 'twas a wilful Forgetfulnefs , for ^ to I'heatrical Matters, they are to be iure within the Sphere of his Knowledge. I come next to the Dramatick Poets, whom this Critick has commended in a manner fo ridiculous, that if he had intended it, he could not 3 PREFACE. xi not have fatiriz'd them more feverely. Thefe are his own Words: ^e Spanifh Dramatick Authors have been long the Magazines whe7ice cur Authors have fupplied themfelves. Scarron / and Montfleuri are Infiances, Can any thing be faid fo much to the Difgrace of the Spanijh Poets as to make therrt the Inventors of the vileft Farces, and to give them for Difciples and Imitators the worft and mod defpicabic of our Writers ? What Notion fliouid we have of certain Poets if we were told that Pradon form'd his Tafte by perufing their Books ? fhould we not have reafon to regard them as the very Sink of the Republick of Letters?. It mull be confefs'd the Cri tick has but bad Talents for commending. Defend me. Hea- ven, from fuch a Panegyrifl! I even prefer his Hatred to his Friendfnip. In order to fhew him the Difference between the Praifes I have beilow'd on fome valuable Spanijh Writers and the fad fbuff he writes about them, I ihall here report what I have faid of Don Lopez de V£ga in my 1 1 8th Letter : That Author hath written Comedies fo excellent^ that the great Corneille affures us^ that he would have given two of his beji 7'ragedies to have been the Inventor of the Lyar. Thou knoweft it was upon the Plan of this Spanifh Play the French Poet compofed his, I leave it now to be decided, whether the Cridc or I aim'd to affront the Spatiijh Nadon» But I fhall be ftiU xii PREFACE. ftill in a better way to obtain a favourable Verdicl, when the Reader fees the Parallel of what we have both faid of the Spanijk Hiflorians. . The Critic contents himfelf with mention^- ing 'The Hiftory of Arragon hy Zurk^y and The General Hiftory of Spain hy Mariana. By an unaccoun table llroke of Folly, of two Au- tliors mention'd by him, there is one who ought to be abhori'd by all good Men: not but that the Hiftory of Mariana is a good Book; but he compofed another *, which the Parliament of Paris condemn'd to uvt FlameSj and which tlie Jefuits themfelves have difa- vow'd. In this Work "he has infmuated, that it is not only lawful, but laudable to put to death an heretical or a tyrannical King: He p"aifes, even to excefs, the execrable Monk who murdei'd Heyiry the Third, and is not afham'd to call him the Honour and Glory of France. It muft be acknowledge, that fince tlie Critic refolv'd to quote but two Authors, he ought to have avoided making Mariana one of them, or ûît he fliould have follow 'd my Example, and mention'd feveral others at the fame time. I fhali tranfcribe from my ii8th Letter the Names of fome, in the order they are therein commended: Antonio de Solis^ Sandoval^ Antonio de Herre^ r^5 Don Bartholomszv de las Cafas, Nor have * De Rege ^ Regis Uptutionc. PREFACE. xiii I forgot to praife fuch Poets and Romance Wri- ters as are worthy the Eileem of Readers of Judgment: As Michael de Cervantes^ Matthe'W Alcman^ Don Alonzo de Hercilla^ John Rufo^ Chriftopher de Virves^ 3zc. It may eafily be determin'd from the number of thofe Authors, whether it was my Defign to fink the Repu- tation of one Nation, in order to raife that of another. It is tme,, I did maintain, and do ftxlî, that the Spaniards have not one Philofo- plier amongft them -, and that none they can have by reafon of the Inquifition. And is not this a Truth of v/hich the whole World is convinced? The Critic indeed will not al- low it. Like a magnanimous and unconque- rable Knight he is determin'd to Hand to his Opinion right or wrong : An exa6l and wor- thy Copy of the Hero of Cervantes, with whom there is no living on good Terms, if one does not purely and fimply confefs, that the very faults of his charming Dulcinea are fuperior to the Virtues of the greateft Prin- ceiTes. In order to give the greater weight to his Opinion, the Critic calls iii the Authority of Father Rapin, v^^ho^ in his Reflexions on Phi- lofophy, fays the Spaniards excel in Metaphy- ficks. But that Author'^ Blander is no cxcufe at all for the Critic's: For example, the Com- mendadon given by this J'^ÇvÀt to the Phyfics and Logic of Ariftotk is fùfnaent to Ihew w^hether xiv PREFACE. whether his Opinion ought to be look'd on as decifive in matters of Philofophy *. ^here appeared iiothing^ fays he, that was fix'd and regular^ either in Logic or true Philofophy^ before Ariflotle. ms Genius^ fo very rational and intelligent^ entered fo deep into the Ahyfs of human U7idirfianding^ that he penetrated to its mofi fecret Receffes^ by the accurate Bif- ttnBions he made as to its Operations. ■ Before him they had never founded this vajl Ocean of the human "Thoughts in order to judge of its Depth. Ariilotle was the firfi who difcovefd this 7iew way^ in order to attain to Science by the Evidence of Demonftration^ and to proceed to Demonjlration geometrically by the Mode of SyUogifm^ the mofi accomplifh*d Work., the greatefi Effort of the human Mind. To Ihew the Impertinence and Ridicule of this Elo- gium, and alfo what fort of Books thofe are which pafled with Father Rapin for Mafter- Pieces in Philofophy, I Ihall only cite a Paf- fage from Des Cartes., another from Malle- branche., and a tliird from Locke. Whoever would be more fully convinced of the Non- fenfe of the Writings of this Grecian Sage need only confult the illuftrious Gaffendi in his E^ercitationes Paradoxicœ adverfus Arijioteli- cos. * Rapin, Rtfwxîons fur la Logique, Num. iv. p. 373, 374- PREFACE, xv'ii Spanifh Minifiry, but the Storms to which all Courts are liable^ have reyncved them from their Places. I'he Man that is moft cried up 'here is Cardinal Aiberoni : not only the Stran- gers^ who are here in great numbers^ but alfo Tnany Spaniards do juftice to that able Mini- fier. . . . Since the Accejfion of Philip V. Spain hath overcome half the Evils which were brought upon her by fuch as were intrufted with the Adrniniftration of Affairs under Phi- lip IV. and Charles II. Her 'Troops are nume- rous^ brave^ and well dtfciplin'd. There* s a fourth Part more People in the Country than there was, by means of the great numbers of French and Flemings who are fettled there % and this Crown, which for one while was per^ fe5îly defpifed, makes as good a figure now, as it did formerly, I think I have now faid enough to fhew the Folly, the Ignorance, and Knavery of this pretended Iberian Knight; for I fhall not re- ply to his Inve6lives, and to thofe grofs Re^ flctlions which he has thrown out againfl me in the clofe of his Epiflle. God forbid that I flioLild ever introduce the Language of Fifh- ftalls upon Parnafj'us: It is the Mind alone, and not the Body, which is a Member of the Republick of Letters. Were it not for this, how often Ihould we be confounded to know in what Rank fome People ought to be placed ? Where, xviii PREFACE. Where, for Example, fhould we beftow a Man, who, after being in iiis Youth a Rope- Dancer, a Tumbler, a Player, in his Old-age married two Dreffers of the Adreiîes one af- ter another, and laft of all, a Turky-Driver that was reduced to ferve in an Alehoufe ; and, which is ftill meaner, to be his own Servant? Sure I am, that the Critic muft allow if this individual P erf on was a Member of the Re- publick of Letters, it would be very difficult to find fuch an Original a proper Station. Before I conclude this Preface, I fhall fay a word or two of fome Tranflations m.ade of the Jewijh Letters: I am told there h di Dutch Tranflation which will quickly appear, the MS. being actually in the Hands of a Book- feller *. I have not feen it; and if I fhould fee it, I am no judge of it, fmce I underfland not the Language : But one, who is a Mailer of it, fays, that it is extremely well done, which is all I know of the matter, having not the leaft: Acquaintance with its Author. I am inform'd alfo from Germany^ that the two firfl Volumes of the Lettres Juives are tranilated into High Dutch, But * 'Tis jufl now printed at the Hague, and dedicated to me: I am very glad of this Opportunity of expreifing my Gratitude for this piece of Civility, and the jull Senfe I have of the Honour done me, in communicating my Letters to a Nation for whom I have an infinite Eitcem. PREFACE. XV ■ I begin with tranfcribing the Opinion of Mallebra'fjche * ; Ariftotle feldom reafon^d on any other than the confufed Ideas we recerce by the Senfes^ and other vague^ general^ . ayid indeterminate Notions^ which conveyed nothi7ig particular to the Underftanding. The 'Terms made ufe of commonly by this Philofopher ferved only to exprefs confiifedly to the Senfes and the Imagination^ the indifcriminate Notions he had of fenfihle Things^ or elfe were contrived to make up fo loofe and indeterminate a Difcourfs as exprejjed nothing diflin5lly. Let me next- introdiice Des Cartes -i,-: The Logic of the Schools is properly fpeaking no- thing more than a Dialeàic \ which teaches US' a Method of imparting to others what we know, or even of putting a Parcel of Words together without Judgment upon Things we know not,, ccnfequently it corrupts Good Senfe rather than augments it. I clofe my Confutation of Father Rapin with a Paflage from Mr. Locke \\ : We recifon, fays he, much better, and with more Perfpi- cuity when we obferve only the Connexion of Proofs^ without methodizing our Thoughts^ or forming them into Syllogifms. . . . God hath not been fo fparing of his Favours to Mankindy * Mallebranche, "Recherche^ as la Vérité, Liv.v. cap. ii. P.38S. f D€s Cartes, Principes de Va Phîlofophie, Preface. }j Effay on Human Underftanding, Bookiv. ch.xvii. xvi PREFACE. Mankind^ as only to make us two-legged Crea- tures^ and leave to Ariftotle the Care of ma- king us reafonable Beings, % Oiie fees by diis how little the Authority of Father Rapin is to be rehed upon, efpecialiy in refpeét to Philoibphers; and in as much as he is profufe in his Prailes of Ariftotle^ one need not be very much furprifed at the Praife he befhows on the Spa-nifo Metaphyficians. It is but a natural Confequence of his way of tiiinking, all thofe Metaphyficians being zea- lous Follov/ers of Ariftotk. But to fhew ei- tlid* the Ignorance or Knavery of our Critick, if there be fo many excellent Philofophers and Metaphyficians in Spain^ why did he not name fome of them ? This he could not polTibly do, or at leaft not without making himfelf ftill more ridiculous tlian he juftly was before. To finifh the Anfwçr I have condefcended to give to his Objedlions, I will endeavour to confute his AfTertion, that I affed to decry the Spanijh Nation. It is true that I faid, and do fay it again, that they are proud, haughty, lazy, fuperftitious, and excelTively fubmifTive to the Monks. But tho' I thus expofed their Faults, as I have done thofe of other Nations, I have done juflice to their Virtues. With- out repeating all I have ever faid on this Sub- jedl:, I will here cite only a few Lines from my I o6th Letter: During the Reign ^/Phi- lip V. there have been very able Men in the Spanifh PREFACE. xix But what is itiil more fingular than all this beyond Comparifon is, that I have rccciv'd Advice that they are adlually re-printing this Work at Avignon^ and that two Volumes of it are already pubhfh'd, but miferably mangled and deformed-, which is the common Fate of every Edidon that is counterfeited in thePope^s Dominions, In the Prefs^ CHINESE LETTERSjoraPHi-, LosopHicAL, Historical and Cri- tical CoRRES^poNDENCE between a CHINESE at Paris, and his Friends in China, Mufccvs, Perjia and Japa??, By the Author of the JEWISH SPT T II E J E W Ï S H S P Y. LETTER CXXL Aaron Mon.c e c a, /;? Isaac Oni?^ Caraite^ formerly a Rabbi ^ at Conftan- tinople. YOU know, dear Ifaac^ how much I was prejudiced againft the Cabbalifts. ShaU I own to you my Weaknefs ? Since I have been in this Countiy, a Converfa- lion I had with a Perfon addiiled to the occult Sci- ences, hath inclined m^e to believe that many Things I formerly thought ridicîulous-, are neither impofîible nor incompatible with true Fhilofophy. Not that i approve all that- is faid by the Difciples oî ParaccU fus. But I think, that tho' it is certain there arc no fuch Beings as Gnomcss Sylphsy Salaniafidçrs, and Vol. IV. B On^ 2 77^^ Jewish Spy. Lett. CXXI. Ondlnes *, yet there is nothing in the Belief of them abfurd, or contrary to the Laws of Nature, as mofi: of our modern Philofophers pretend. My Reafons arc thefe. What Weight they will have with you, I know not. In order to deny the Foffibility of Exiflence to a- hy Thing, there muft be Proof not only of its Non-exiftence, but of its Incapacity of Exiftence. But I find no Proofs of the latter Sort againft Sylphs, Sahînanders, Gnomes and Ondlhes, What ImpoHi- bility is there in fuppofing, that there are animate Bodies compofed of fo fubcile and delicate a Matter as not to fall under the Cognizance of ourSenfes ? We admit that they are not ftrong enough to pene- trate the Recefles of Nature, where the firft Ele- ments of Things lie hid. They perceive none but the more grofs Caufes. We can derive from thence no Right to deny, that thofe delicate Principles are in being. Why then fhould we believe, that there cannot be animated Creatures, compofed of a Mat- ter fo thin as not to ftrike our Senfes ? Before the Invention of Microfcopes, we knew not that Vinegar contained an aftoniihing Quantity of Worms ; we boldly deny'd that there were little Fifhes in all the Water v/e drank ; and yet we have been many Years convinced of the Exiftence of all thefe Animals. Since then, there is a Number of animated Creatures in Water, which our naked Eyes cannot dilcover, why may not the like be found in the Air and in the other Elements ? But it will be faid, thefe InfcSis are not concealed from us hut through their Littlenefs^ luhereas it ispre^ tended * According to the Cahhalijls, tlie Sylphs inhabit the Jir, the Gnomes the Earthy that is, within it, the Sala- menders in the Region of jP/A. and the Ondines the Lett.CXXI. 72^^ Jewish Spy. 3 tended that //;^ Gnomes, Sylphs, &c. are oftheor^ dinary Size of Men. To this 1 anfwer, that the Height of the Gnomes and of the Sylphs is no Reafon why they fhould be- come vifible, w.hile the Parts of which they are com- pounded are fuppofed to be extremely delicate. A Space of Air fix Foot long ftrikes the Sight no mors than one of a Foot or of an Inch. In like manner, fuppofrng the Gnomes to be compofed of a light and aerial Matter, their Stature would contribute no- thing to their becoming vifible. Let us imagine a Column of thofe Worm-s which are found in Vine- gar, extending from the Earth to the Sky -, our Eyes, without the Ailiftance of Microfcopes, would not be at all affected by this Column, notwithftand- ing its immenfe Extenfion, becaufe its component Parts fall not under the Cognizance of our Senfes, Thus, tho' an infinite Number of Atoms fill up the Space between the Earth and the Moon, yet to us it appears void, becaufe the A4atter with which it is filled, is not difcernable by our Senfes. It is to no purpofe, therefore, to oppofe the Exiflience of thefe Eiementary People, by alledging, that we do not perceive them. It fuffices to eflablifh the PolTibility of the Thing, to prove that a great Number of li- ving Creatures aftually exift, which our Senfes, un- alliited, cannot difcern. When we once admit, that the Air may be peo- pled with inviiible Creatures, it naturally follows, that the Earth, the Water, and the Fire, which are Elements compofed of Parts more eafily united, have alfo in them the Power of producing a Number of Bodies Vv'hich God may animate, and yet by the Delicacy of their Parts, they will efcape our Senfes. But^ reply the Philofophers, we have no Idea of ■hefe pretended reafcnable Creatures -, we know not hew '^ B 2 thc^ 4 7/^^ Jewish Spy. Lett. CXXI. they cxifi ; zve are intirely igmra?it cfthei?- Fotms and Figures^ and it is ridiculous to admit a Thing of ivhich IV e have not any Notion. This manner of reafoning, with SubmiiHon to the Learned among the Moderns, is far from being conclufive. Haveyou^ it may be replied to them, any more dijîin^ Notion of your own Soul ? Do )r.u comprehend any thing more about it^ than that it is a Spirit P Do you knozv what Form or Figure it has f No, without doubt, Tou admit ^ hc-wever, its Exijf- ence. JV/jy then will you deny that of Sylphs and Gnomes, of vjhich you have a lefs confufed Idea than cfc Spirit f Becaufe vjhatever is fuppojed to be mate- rial, however delicate it may he, falls under the Cogni- %a7:ce of the Human TJndtrftandirg. The Wit of Man is fo bounded, that it is not only very pofTible it may not have any Idea of cer- tain Creatures ; but it might even very eafily hap- pen, that a great Number of knowing People might, neverthelef^, be ignorant of the Pofïibility of Animals living in Water. Let us fuppofe that a certain Num- ber of Men live in a Country of a dry fandy Soil, far from the Sea and Rivers, and furnifhed only with Pits. The Thing is by no means impoffible. In many of the Defarts of Arabia there is only fuch Pits dug by the Bedouins. Thefe Men, without doubt, would have no Idea of Fifh, if they did not hear of them from others. They would certainly look upon it as a Thing abfurd to fuppofe, that any Creature could live long in Water when they faw fuch Land- Animals prefently die, as happen to fall therein. I ask, if Fifh would exift the lefs, or if the Reafonings of thefe fort of People would deftroy the Cod in the Mediterranean, or the Whales in the Ocean ? fc is the fame thing with refpe<^ to the Philofo- phcrs Lett. CXXL The Jewish Spy. $ phers who deny the PofTibility of Sylphs and o^ Gnomes ; they know nothing of what pafTes in the Air; their iliort Sight reprefents it to them as a great wide Space, a large and extended Mafs, and they pretend to judge of what pailes in that Mafs by the Ideas they have of a void Space, which is intirely oppofite thereto. For tho' the Phiîofophers are per- fuaded that the Extent between the Earth and th;; Firmament is full of Bodies; or, to exprefs my ielf better, is^'ne intire Body ; yet their Senfes feein to get the better of their Meditations v/hen they de- ny the PofTibihty of the exifting of thefe elementary People. You fee, my dear Ifaac^ the Reafons upon which T ground my Opinion. As to the reft, I am fully perfuaded that v/e cannot have any Sort of Com.- merce with thefe Sylphs and Gnomes. I fay I am a? fully perfuaded of the impofïîbiiity of this, as of the Poffibility of their Exiifence. Far from giving in to the ridiculous Tales and chimerical V liions of the Cabalifts, Iai?j-m,that if there fhould exift fuch E- lementary People, they can liever'endar themfelvcî vifible to Men, as it is alfo impoffible for Men to ftrengthen or quicken their Senfes to fuch a Degree as to be able to penetrate what God and Nature? think proper to conceal from them. I can'c help laughing when I hear a Cahalift gravely tell me, That concentrating the Fire of the World by cou" cave MÎ7'rors in a Globe of Glafs^ gainitig thereby a certain folar Powder^ tuhich being purified from thii ether Elements^ and a certain ^lantiiy thereof taken daily ^ I may exalt the Fire ivithin me to fuch a ^ De- gree^ as to become^ in fame meafure^ of a fery Nature. The Secret for obtaining the Familiarity of Gnomes^ Sylphs and Nymphs^ feems to me not a grain lefs ridiculous. It; confifts in taking a Glair. B 3 full 6 The Jewish Spy. Lett. CXXI. full of Air^ mingled with Water or with Earth ^ this is to he left for a Month expofed to the Sun ;' ihen the Elements are to be feparated ; ivhich being performed, we have a wonderful Medicine, capable cf exalting in us whatever Element we would have predominant, and cf rendering our Senfes quick enough to difcerîî thefe Elementary People ^. Good Senfe and the Light of Nature are fuffici- ent to {hew me the Folly of this fort of Reafoning, and the Impoffibility there is of efleclbcgany Thing by thefe Cahaliftical Secrets. For fuppofe I would make an Acquaintance with a Salamander, of what TJfe would all thefolar Powder be that I could pof- iibly amafs together ? Would it ever deftroy in me that terreflrial Matter that is every Day augmented by my Food ? Could it ever get the better of the Air by v/hich I live and breathe ? Suppofe I had 1 wallowed ever fo much of this Powder, a Quarter of an Hour af.er I take in a great Quantity of Air, and my Lungs, which receive and reject, my No- llrils and my Mouth which give it Entrance into my Body, are the fworn Enemies of the Element cf Fire, which I would have predominant over the left. The fame mav be faid of the other Secret?, which tend to render fome one Element predomi- jiant in Man, and thereby to give him an igneous or aquatic Nature. The Bl indnefs of the Cahalifls goes yet a greater length. They alTure us, that by applying to the Na- vel a little f the Earth prepared for obtaining the So- ciety of the Gnom.es, one may fufiain the want of Food * The' Englijh Reader may fee this Syftem fet in a beautiful Light in Popi's Rape of thel.QQY.. If he likes better to read it in Profe, he may fatiffy himfe f by peruf.ng Court Gahalis^ whence our Author bor- rows his Quotations, Lett. CXXI. The Jewish Spy. 7 Food and Dr'ink^ wkhciit any fort of Inconvenience. The famous Paracelfus affirms that he tried this ; and it mufl be owned, that he was either a great Foclora4i impudent Lyar, who durfl afTert fo evi- dent an Impofture as this is to the Face of the Pub- lick. lam not aftonifhed at all, when I fee a Cahalijî writing ftich Impertinencies as thefe, becaufe at the fame time I difcern Stories as abfurd and as contrary to goodSenfe, as gravely told by the mofl eminent Dodlors in all Religions,- How many Lyes have hQQi:\ Avritten by our Rabbies on the Subjeél of the Satyrs and Faipis of Antiquity ? Rabbi Abraham really imagined there were fuch Creatures, but that they were imperfect, becaufe God was furprized by the Approach of the Evening of the Sabbath, and had not time fufncient to make an end of them. A- mong the 'Na'z.arcnes^ TertuUian^ yujiin, LaSfantiuSy Cyprian^ CUir.eni of Alexandria and Jthenagorasy fancied thefe Fauns were Angels transformed into this Shape for ti^e Crime they committed, when God threw fo many of them into Hell ; and they concluded this Fall of Angels to have happened on account of their fuffering themfelves to become e- namour'd of Women. The Pagans pufti'd this Er- ror ftill farther ; for they held thefe Fauns to be Divinities. Among Sentiments (o extraordinary as thefe are, it is impofïîble that a Philofopher who makes ufe of his Reafon, fliould adopt any one of them. They are equally ridiculous and contrary to the Light of Nature. It may be even that the Satyrs^ as de- fcribed by the Ancients, never did exift ; and that many ufelcfs DifTertations have ht^n made on the I- deas of feme Painter or Poet, who was the Creator of thefe imaginary Beings, lam cfoi^iaiori, that B 4 pre- 8 7le Jewish Spy. Lett. CXXL vious to the explaining of a Thing, we ought feri- oufly to confider whether it exifts, or whether ever it did exift. Defcartes has given us a long Explica- tion of the perpetual Lamps that are to be found m the Tombs of the Ancients ; and we have fince been convinced that the Fadl; is falfe. Democritus put his Wit to the torture for feveral Days to account for Wool which he fancied he had found grov/ing on the Figs in his Garden. He made thereupon a Difcouife, with which himfelfand his Priends v/ere very well fatisfied. His Maid, however, diverted herfelf at their Expence by difabufing them, (hew- ing that .all the learned Refearches of this Philofo- piier was fo much Study and Pains thrown away. it may be the Fau?is of Antiquity greatly refemb'ed tp.Q Figs of Democritus ; and thofe who have made DilTertations on thefe Half-Men Half-Brutes would be greatly furprized, if they fliould find in any -an- cient Author, that they never exifted any where but in his Imagination and in his Writings. I will not however, dear IJ^ac-, pretend to afHrm, that what is faid with regard to Faims^ ought to be ccnfidered, as invented at pleafure ; on the contra- ry, I believe their Exiftence poffible. We read m the Life of Paul the Hermit, written by Jcrcme^ a fam.ous Doctor among the Nazareues, as alfo in îhat of Anthony^ another Hermit, compofcd by A- thanafius^ that thefe folitary Perfons had long Con- verfaticns with Fauns \ and that they owned to them that they were not unacquainted with the Exiftence cf a Deity *. If we refufe Ciedit to thefe Authors, we * Accordicg to St. Jerofne, St, Anthony met with a Centaur, exa<[^ly like what is defcribtd in the Poets. The fame Author alTures us, that not long after this St. Anthony faw alfo a Satyr, refembling thofe we fee in Paintings. Con" Lett. CXXI. The Jewish Spy. 9 we find in PUny^ that Satyrs are frequent in the In- dicf. Pluiarch aflures us, that they prefented to Sylla as he pafs'd by Dyrachium^ now Durazzo in Albania^ a h'ving Satyr, The Roman confidered him attentively, but could make nothing of his Language, his Voice being exceffively harfli, feem- ing to participate of the Neighing of a Horfe, and the Cry of a Goat *. This Paflage in Hiflory inclines me to think, that all the Satyrs we hear of, were no other than Monfters produced by criminal Converfe between Mankind and the Females of other Animals ; and that thefe Creatures, far from having Virtues fupe- rior to Mortals, had much more of the Brute than of the Man, not being able to exprefs themfelves but in all refpccis like the Satyr of Sylla. The Su- perftition of Pagamfm made Deities of thefe Half- Men, the Naxarcnes will have them to be Angels or Demons, the "Jevjs imperfect Creatures ; the Philofopher, feeming.to difdain the Examination of this Qiieftion, contents himfelf with denying their Exiftence, that he may not be obliged to explain^ their Nature?. Preferve thy Health, dear Ifaac^ live content and fatisfied, and may the God of our Fathers heaj5 Riches upon thee,. Hambcurgh, B5 LETTER, Confpicit (Antonius) hominem equo mixtvjn^ cut opinia Fo'étarum Hypvceniû.iiro focahulum indidit . . . Nee mora inter faxojum con-vallem haud grandem, homnnculem 'vidit, adunch naribus^ fronts corr.ibus a/per at a,, cujus extremu pars corporis in caprantm pedes dejtnebat. Hieronymus tpiftcl. iii. de vita Pauli, primi Eremitce. See alfo the A-th Part of the Secret Memoirs of the Republick of Let- ters ; r^vherein the Wonders reported by St. Jerome are fui- Ij confidered. * hutarcli in ths life of Sylla^ 10 The Jewish Spy. Lett. CXXIL LETTER CXXIL Aar on Mon ce ca ^ Isaac On is, Cm'aite^ formerly a Rabbi at Conftan- tincple. T Don't know, dear Ifaac^ to what Caufe to at- ■* tribute that violent Hatred which all People pro- fefs to have againft thofe of our Nation. Whatever Religion they have, in whatever Climate they in- habit, they feem to agree in this Point. The Ma- hotnmedansy the Fopifi) Nazarenes^ the Reform' d, the Ârminians and the Lutherans defpife, equally agree in defpifing us, and carry their Defpite to Excefs. I for fome time thought that this Antipathy might "be cccafioned by a Diverfity cf Belief. But I was nbliged to change this Way of thinking, when I faw Numbers differing in Religion, who had not- withflanding the moft perfect Eileem for each other. The ^iakers differ as widely as Vv'e from, the Naza- renes ; they have no Sacrament, not even fo much as that of Baptifm ; hcwcver, the Naxarenes do not either hate or defpife them. We muft look therefore for fome other Caufe than Religion, in order to account for that Antipa- thy which all Nations have to us. J do indeed be- lieve, that Religion influences the lower Clafs of People in their Notions of Jews^ in fome meafure ; but it is certain, that it does not determine them intirely : v;herefore, there muff be fome particular Subjedt whence the unanimous Hatred of all People muft flow. Did it come purely from Différence in point Lett. CXXII. r/'^ Jewish Spy. ïî point of Faith, why fhould the Turks hate us more than they do the Nazarenes P Or thefe latter why (hould they deteft us more than Tuî'Âs f I believe, dear IfaaCy that w^e ought to feek in the evil Conduâ of our own Brethren, what we gene- rally attribute to Difference in Religion. If we credit certain Na%arene Hiftorians, we fhall find in their Writings, that the horrid Crimes of certain ^ews have in all times had defperate Confequences in refpe