mi FROM THE LIBRARY OF REV. LOUIS FITZGERALD BENSON. D. D. BEQUEATHED BY HIM TO THE LIBRARY OF PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY W3X . WEDDERBURNS and their Work ; or, The Sacred Poetry of the Scottish Reformation in its Historical Relation to that of Germany, a lecture, by A. F. Mitchell, D.D., 4to, boards, 2s 6d 1867 CATECHISMSV OF THE SECOND REFORMATION PART I.— THE SHORTER CATECHISM OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY AND ITS PURITAN PRECURSORS. PART II.-RUTHERFURD'S AND OTHER SCOTTISH CATECHISMS OF THE SAME EPOCH. WITH HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION AND BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES y ALEXANDER F. MITCHELL, D.D. PROFESSOR OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS LONDON : JAMES NISBET .^' CO., BERNERS STREET 1886. TO THE MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND ANNO MDCCCLXXXV THIS TREATISE IS RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED BY ALEXANDER F. MITCHELL THEIR MODERATOR PREFATORY NOTE. This Treatise is intended to explain the composition and sources of the Catechisms of the Westminster Assembly, and to give specimens of the Catechisms which were previously in use among the doctrinal Puritans in England and Scotland, as well as of those which were drawn up to be laid before the Assembly's Committee. It is the necessary sequence of the treatises and articles I have already published on the history of the Assembly, and in explanation of their doctrinal standards. The great mass of the catechetical manuals which had to be consulted in com- piling it had to be sought for out of Scotland ; and, as it was only at distant intervals I could prosecute my researches in the English Libraries which contained them, the completion of the volume has been delayed much longer than was anticipated when it was first taken in hand. I shall have no cause to grudge the time or trouble bestowed on it if it shall prove in any measure helpful to my brethren in the various Presbyterian Churches, and shall be found to cast any fresh light on the history and meaning VI PREFATORY NOTE. of those Catechisms which they still love, or to explain the reasons of the strong hold these have so long maintained on the reverence and affection of young and old in our Churches. My best thanks are due to the authorities of the British Museum, and of Sion College Library, in London; of the Bodleian Library, in Oxford ; of the Libraries of Trinity and Emmanuel Colleges, Cambridge ; and of the Univer- sity, the Advocates', and the New College Libraries in Edinburgh, as well as to my friends, Professor Wright of Cambridge and Professor Dickson of Glasgow, for the facilities they have given or procured for me in the pro- secution of my researches. My thanks are also due to the Eev. Dr. Anderson and D. Hay Fleming, Esq., St. Andrews, for the great trouble they hav^ taken in revising the proof-sheets. ALEX. F. MITCHELL. CONTENTS. PAGE Prefatory Note, ...... v Introduction, ....... ix Biographical Notices, ...... xxxix Part I. THE SHORTER CATECHISM OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBL Y AND ITS PURITAN PRECURSORS. The Shorter Catechism of the Westminster Assembly, reprinted from an early English edition, and each answer compared with answers in previous Puritan Catechisms, . . 1 Gouge's Brief Method of Catechising, .... 41 Eogers' Chief Grounds of Christian Eeligion, ... 53 Ball's Short Catechism, ..... 65 Palmer's Endeavour of making the Principles of Christian Eeligion . . . plain and easy. Part i., Questions and Answers tending to explain the Articles of the Creed, . 93 Catechism by M. N., B.D. The second main part, explaining the Ten Commandments, . . . . . 119 Vlll CONTENTS. PAGE Ussher's Principles of Christian Eeligion, . . . 137 Austin's Parliament's Rules and Directions drawn into Questions and Answers, ...... 151 ^avt II. RUTHERFURD'S AND OTHER SCOTTISH CATECHISMS. Rutherfurd's Catechism, ..... 161 Wyllie's Catechism, ...... 243 A Fragment (apparently by Mr. Robert Blair), . . 263 The A, B, C ; or A Catechism for Young Children, . . 267 The New Catechism, according to the form of the Church of Scotland, . . . . . ^ . 277 INTRODUCTION/ The Catechisms of the Westminster Assembly, and especially their Shorter Catechism, may be regarded as, in several respects, the most remarkable of their symbolical books, the matured fruit of all their consultations and debates, the quintessence of that system of truth in which they desired to train English-speaking youth, and faithful training in which, I believe, has done more on both sides of the Atlantic to keep alive reverence for the old theology than all other human instrumentalities whatever. It may be said, without exaggeration, of the catechisms framed on the system of the doctrinal Puritans, and pub- lished in England between the years 1600 and 1645, that their name is legion. Perhaps no more convincing proof could be cited of the great influence they were exercising through- out these years of trial and oppression, and also of the manner in which they came to acquire, retain, and increase it, than that which is furnished by the floods of different cate- chisms and different editions of the same catechism — often five or six, in several cases ten or twelve, and in some cases from twenty to thirty editions — being poured forth from the London press in rapid succession. Among the members of the Assembly there were at least twelve or fourteen who had ^ This Introduction is a revision and abridgment of the Lecture on the Catechisms contained in my book on ' ' The Westminster Assembly and AVestminster Standards." h X INTRODUCTION. prepared and published catechisms of their own years before the Assembly met, as Twisse, White, Gataker, Gouge, Wilkinson, Wilson, Walker, Palmer, Cawdrey, Sedgewick, Byfield, and possibly Newcomen, Lyford, Hodges, and Fox- croft, to say nothing of Cartwright, Perkins, Ussher, Eogers, and Ball, who somewhat earlier had prepared the way for them, and whom several of them can be shown to have more or less followed in their plan or in details. The first step towards the preparation of a catechism may be said to have been taken by the Assembly in December 1643,^ when Messrs. Marshall, Palmer, Goodwin, Young, and Herle, with the Scottish Commissioners, were appointed a committee to draw up a directory for public worship. That treatise was intended to include a directory for catechising, if not a formal catechism, and the preparation of the paper on this subject was intrusted to Mr. Herbert Palmer.^ Not- withstanding Palmer's great reputation as a catechist, his paper, in the shape in which it was first presented, does not appear to have come up to the expectations of the Scottish Commissioners. Their chronicler tells us, " Mr. Marshall's part anent preaching, and Mr. Palmer's about catechising, though the one be the best preacher, and the other the best catechist in England, yet we no ways like it ; so their papers are passed in (i.e. into) our hands to frame them according to our mind."^ This was written on 2d April 1644, and on 21st November of the same year he briefly records that "the catechise is drawn up, and I think shall not take up much time," and again, on 26th December, that "we have near[ly] 1 Baillie's Letters, vol. ii. p. 118. 2 Jbid. p. 140. ' Ibid. p. 148. I INTRODUCTION. XI also agreed in private on a draught of catechism, where- upon, when it comes into public, we expect little debate." The natural inference from these notices seems to be that the catechism then drawn up and nearly agreed on in private, was either some one which had been drafted by themselves in terms of the remit made to them — the cate- chism published in 1644 for the benefit of both kingdoms, or that of Kutherfurd, till now extant only in MS. — and which they were prematurely counting on getting the committee and the Assembly to accept without much dis- cussion, or else that it was some modification of Mr. Palmer's directory or catechism, such as we shall find reason to believe they were willing, after consultation with their friends in the North, to accept, at least in its method and principles. Before this date the printed Minutes^ of the Assembly show that Messrs. Marshall, Tuckney, Newcomen, and Hill had been added to Mr. Palmer " for hastening the catechism," and that on 7th February 1644-5 Messrs. Eeynolds and Delm^ were added, — of course in con- junction with the Scotch Commissioners, who claimed the right to be on all committees appointed to carry out any part of the uniformity covenanted for between the Churches. Among the catechisms which I examined cursorily in 1866 in the British Museum and in Sion College Library was one bearing the title. An Endeavour of making Christian Religion easie, and published at Cambridge in 1640 without the author's name, but which, from Dr. Wallis's preface to his Explanation of the Shorter Catechism, I concluded was probably Palmer's. In it each of the principal answers is, 1 Page 12, 2d December 1644. Xll INTRODUCTION. by repetition of part of the question, made a complete and independent proposition, and these principal answers are broken down in a peculiar way into a series of subordinate questions, all capable of being answered by the monosyllables Ay or No. It did not then strike me as so similar to the Westminster Catechisms in their ultimate form as it does now, and not knowing then what we know now (that the Minutes have been transcribed from the almost illegible original) of the successive stages by which this ultimate form was reached, I had almost forsjotten all about it, till ten years ago, when, as I ruminated over the notes of a very un- intelligible debate in the Minutes, this fact came back to my remembrance as one w^hich might enable me to cast light on it. It was not my good fortune, however, to get back to the British Museum till November 1879, and before that time my attention, as well as that of others, had been called by an Edinburgh bookseller to what is said by Dr. Belfrage on the history of the Shorter Catechism in the introduction prefixed to the second edition of his Practical Exposition of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. This history was not con- tained in the earlier edition of the book. Dr. Belfrage appears to have seen Palmer's Catechism, and to have com- pared it with the Assembly's, but his conclusion regarding it coincided rather with my first impressions. He states, how- ever, that Dr. M'Crie, on the ground of the passage quoted above from Baillie, was disposed to come to the conclusion that " Mr. Palmer was concerned in the first draft of the Catechism." My friend Dr. Briggs, who also saw Palmer's treatise when in London in 1879, early in the following year gave an interesting account of its relations to the Shorter Cate- I INTRODUCTION. XlU chism in the Pi^cshyterian Bevievj for January 1880. I have preferred to wait till I had leisure to make a further study of most of the contemporary Puritan catechisms, and might venture to speak of their relations with fuller knowledge. I have now little doubt that the paper which Palmer gave in to the Committee and to the Assembly in 1645, and which occasioned the debate to which I have referred, was substan- tially the same with the preface to his catechism. This details the method which he had himself made use of in his catechisings, and which many modern keys (as they are called) to the Shorter Catechism have borrowed from him or from Dr. John Wallis, who, without loss of time, applied the system of his revered master to the new catechism which the Assembly ultimately agreed on. The Scotch Commis- sioners, when they first heard this paper, were not satisfied with it ; and their impartiality therefore is the more highly to be commended in regard to it. They had tliem selves in the meantime brought out " the jSTew Catechism according to the form of the Kirk of Scotland, published for the benefit of both Kingdoms,"^ and perhaps in the hope that it might be adopted as the common catechism. Yet when they had had time to consider the subject more deliberately, and advise with their friends in Scotland regarding it, they proved in the debate to which I have referred, if not the only, certainly the most prominent advocates of Palmer's method and peculiar form of catechism. This memorable, but briefly recorded debate occurred in the Assembly on the 13th of May 1645, probably just after the fifth edition of Palmer's little treatise had appeared. His efforts on that occasion were directed mainly 1 Published at London 1645. XIV INTRODUCTION. to securing the Assembly's approval of his method of cate- chising rather than of the detailed contents of his catechism. Yet, as I read the brief minutes of the debate, his efforts were not crowned with success. The Scotch Commissioners, Eutherfurd and Gillespie, spoke warmly in favour of his method of catechising, — of the practice he adopted both of making each principal answer a distinct and complete pro- position, and of breaking down the principal answers by subordinate questions which could all be answered by Ay or No. His personal friend Delme gave the plan a sort of general support, but all the other speakers, and among them Messrs. Marshall and Eeynolds, two of the most prominent members of his committee, while frankly acknowledging his great skill and success as a catechist, and the good that might come from ministers in their catechisings availing themselves of his method, resolutely objected to have these subordinate questions and answers reduced to rigid form, and inserted in the public catechism.^ One can hardly con- template without a shudder how near we were to missing the most concise, nervous, and severely logical catechism in our language had Mr. Palmer and the Scotch Commissioners ^ Minutes of Westminster Assembly, pp. 91-94 — Mr. Marshall ; " I con- fess that the pains which that brother that brought in the Report [hath taken] is both accepted with God and hath been blessed by him. . . . But I crave leave to give a few dissenting thoughts to the method pro- pounded. " These were in substance that people would come to get up the subordinate answers by rote as well as the principal ones, that good might come of the catechiser himself breaking up the principal answers in the method proposed, but not from their being inserted into the catechism and learned by rote. He approved, however, of commending all this in the preface to the catechism. Mr. Reynolds : '* We all agree that way which is most for ingenerating knowledge is most to be used. But that this way before you is the best way I cannot discern. [If] j^^ou resolve it shall be INTRODUCTION. XV at that time carried their point, and got these subordinate questions and answers inserted in the catechism. I do not think that was further pressed on the Assembly after this date/ but Mr. Palmer continued to be so persuaded of its excellence and importance that he determined with himself that he would print upon his own method the catechism which the Assembly should ultimately adopt, and, departing to his rest ere that had been completed, he left his purpose, as a sacred legacy, to be executed by his young friend Wallis. He accordingly in 1648 published that explanation of the Shorter Catechism on the model of Palmer's treatise, on which, as already stated, several so-called keys to it have in our own day been based. On the first day of August 1645 a further report was presented by the committee to the Assembly. The interval may possibly have been employed in trying to put the materials of Palmer's Catechism into more acceptable shape, or to bring it nearer to the Scotch one (which, though more brief, is framed on the same general plan), and to disencum- ber it of all the subordinate questions to the formal insertion of which objection had been taken. The only hints which but a directory, then how shall those Ayes or Noes be of use ? . . . You will obtain your end as well by setting it down in the preface to the cate- chism." Seaman says there were two questions before them, the one relating to a catechism, the other to the method of catechising, and that the two should be kept distinct, and the minister not too strictly tied up as to the latter. Palmer was somewhat dissatisfied with the result of the debate, and said that if he had not a peculiar interest in the matter he would have spoken more upon it. ^ Baillie, however, says at a later date : ** We had passed a quarter of the catechise and thought to have made short work with the rest : but they are fallen into such mistakes and endless j anglings about both the method and the matter that all think it will be longsome work." — Letters, vol. ii. p. 416. XVI INTRODUCTION. the Minutes supply to guide us are that there was a debate as to whether the Creed should be expressed and probably made (as it was both in the Scotch and in Palmer's, and several contemporary catechisms) the basis of the exposition of the articles of Faith, or whether these articles should be taken up in the systematic order more usually adopted in strictly Puritan catechisms. There was also a debate con- cerning God, which was one of the first articles in all the catechisms of the period, whether they were framed on the basis of the Apostles' Creed or on that of the commonly received system of theology. But I conclude that the com- mittee was not yet altogether of one mind,^ and that it was on this account that, after debate on 20th August, it was reconstituted, and Mr. Palmer, Dr. Stanton, and Mr. Young were appointed to draw up the whole draft of the catechism with all convenient speed. Either, however, they did not proceed very speedily or they met with unexpected diffi- culties in their undertaking, and on 22d July 1646, Mr. Ward was adjoined to them. It was not till 11th September 1646 that their report was called for, nor till the afternoon of Monday 14th September that it was actually presented; and from that date on to the 4th January 1646-7 it was from time to time taken up by the Assembly and passed as far as the fourth commandment.^ On 1st December, how- ever, before much of it had passed, a large addition was again made to the committee, viz., Messrs. Whitaker, Nye, and Byfield, and "the brethren who had been intrusted with the methodising of the Confession of Faith," viz., Messrs. Eeynolds, Herle, Newcomen, Arrowsmith, and J Minutes, pp. 124, 125. 2 j^i^^ pp, 281-318. INTRODUCTION. XVll Tuckney. Most probably it was in consequence uf these changes on the committee that on the 14th of January, on a motion by Mr. Vines, it was ordered " that the committee for the catechism do prepare a draught of tiuo catechisms, one more large and another more brief, in the preparation of which they are to have an eye to the Confession of Faith and the matter of the catechism already begun," ^ or, as the Scotch Commissioners report it in a letter to the Commis- sion of their own Assembly, which bears unmistakable evidence of being from the hand of Eutherfurd : " The Assembly of Divines, after they had made some progress in the catechism which was brought in to them from their committee, and having found it very difficult to satisfy themselves or the world with one form of catechism or to dress up milk and meat both in one dish, have, after second thoughts, recommitted the work that two forms of catechism may be prepared, one more exact and comprehensive, another more easie and short for new beginners." ^ The catechism which had already been so far passed was unquestionably still on the basis of Palmer's, but a large portion of the detailed historical explanations of the second part of the creed, relating to the birth, life, death, and resurrection of our Lord, w^as omitted, and in the exposition of the com- mandments another basis is already plainly discernible, ^ Minutes, p. 321 ; also Baillie's Letters, vol. ii. p. 379. - MS. Minutes of Commission. To the same effect, Gillespie says to the Assembly in Edinburgh in August 1647, that the di\ines have found great diflSculty ' ' how to make it full, such as might be expected from an Assembly, and, upon the other part, how to condescend to the capacity of the common and unlearned. Therefore they are a-making two distinct catechisms — a short and plain one for these, and a larger one for those of understanding." Appendix to Baillie's Letters, vol. iii. p. 452. XVlll INTRODUCTION. while a more pronounced Calvinistic character is given to the doctrinal teaching. The variations from and additions to individual answers can in general be still traced to other contemporary catechisms, and the more important of them to those of Ussher, on whose catechetical manuals (as on his Articles of Eeligion for their Confession) the divines seem to take pleasure in falling back, especially on all cardinal questions. Even this partially-passed recension of a cate- chism follows his and more strictly Puritan treatises rather than Palmer's, in placing in the forefront the question and answer as to the rule of faith, and in inserting another as to the decrees of God ; and it is to the same source we have to trace the questions and answers as to the covenants of works and grace, the prophetical, priestly, and kingly offices of the Eedeemer, and the effectual calling, justification, adoption, the sanctification and perseverance of those who have been made partakers of redemption, and even the detailed and specific statements as to the sinfulness of the estate into which man fell. All these, which make the Westminster Catechisms what they ultimately became, are to be sought outside of Palmer's Endeavour of making Christian Religion easie, which the more they tried to adapt it to their purpose the more they had to alter or supplement it ; and all these are to be found in the distinctively Calvinistic catechisms of Ezekiel Eogers, John Ball, William Gouge, M. N. [New- comen or NichoU], and, to a considerable extent, in those of Henry Wilkinson and Adoniram By field, as well as in those of Archbishop Ussher. Of this I deem myself at length entitled to speak with some confidence, having had the opportunity of carefully comparing the answers in their INTRODUCTION. XIX manuals as well as in Palmer's with the definitions ultimately inserted by the Assembly in one or other of its catechisms. It was not till after the Scripture proofs for the Confession of Faith were completed that the result of the labours of the reconstituted committee in preparing a Larger Catechism were called for. But, on 15th April 1647, the first portion of them was presented to the Assembly and further portions were from time to time presented and discussed till, on 15th October of the same year, the Larger Catechism was finished, substantially in the shape in which we still have it. The doctrinal part of this manual, as every one who has care- fully studied it knows, and as the resolution reconstituting the committee prepares us to expect, is taken to a large extent from the Confession of Faith. The explanation of the ten commandments, and of the duties required and the sins forbidden under each, is largely derived from Ussher's Body of Divinity, Mcholl's and Ball's catechisms, and per- haps also from Cartwright's Body of Divinity and some of the larger practical treatises of Perkins. The exposition of the Lord's Prayer has been got in part from the same sources, in part also from Attersoll's, or some other catechism based on Perkins's treatise on the Lord's Prayer, and like it, supplying matter for confession of sin, as well as for prayer more strictly so called, under each of the petitions of the prayer. I can enter into particulars as to this derivation or correspondence only in the most cursory way in this intro- duction ; but in the collection of catechisms which follows I have endeavoured to provide the materials for tracing it out much more fully. The first question or interrogation, which does not seem XX INTRODUCTION. to have appeared in the former draft of the committee, is taken from the old English translation of Cahdn's Catechism, What is the principal and chief end of man's life ? The answer to this question may be said to combine the answers to Question 3d in the Catechisms of Calvin and Ames, " To have his glory showed forth in us," and " in the enjoying of God," and it may have been taken from them ; or the first part may have been taken from Eogers, Ball, or Palmer, and the second from an Italian catechism of the sixteenth century.^ The second question is one found in several contemporary catechisms, and the answer to it is substantially taken from the Confession of Faith. The third question, which in the former draft had stood apparently at the head,^ is put here in a somewhat altered shape, and the clause which had there been principal, and ao-ain becomes so in the Shorter Catechism, is brouQ-ht in as subsidiary and thrown to the end of the answer. The next question, relating to the proofs showing that the Scriptures are the Word of God, is found in many Puritan catechisms, and the answer is abridged from the Con- fession of Faith. The question as to what the Scriptures principally or especially teach is found both in Paget's and Ball's Catechism, and the answer in Ussher's Prin- ciples of Christian Religion. The next question, What do the Scriptures make known of God ? and the answer, are found in analogous forms in Eutherfurd's and some other contemporary manuals. The answer to the question, What is God ? ^ had in the former draft been taken from 1 " Goder' eternamente Dio." - Minuter, p. 281. 3 " God is a most glorious being, intiuite in all perfections." INTRODUCTION. XXI Palmer's work, with the exception that " perfection," in the singular, had been changed into " perfections/' in the plural, as it had been in another catechism published anonymously in the previous year. Here the former de- scription is exchanged for one abridged apparently from Ussher's Body of Divinity} The next answer, respecting the properties or attributes of God, was at first distinct from the previous one. Dr. Briggs supposes it may have been got by crushing into one the answers to more than a score of questions in Palmer's treatise ; and Dr. Matthews' by a somewhat similar condensation of various answers in Ball's larger catechism. But it is simply an abridgment of a paragraph in Chapter II. of the Confession of Faith ; and the ultimate answer of the Larger Catechism to the question, What is God ? was got by joining these two answers into one. The answer to the same question in the Shorter Catechism is composed of the scriptural definition, " God is a Spirit," with the incommunicable attributes arranged in the same order as they were by Rogers, but in adjectival form, and the communicable in substantive form almost exactly as they had been given by Egerton. But time will not admit of my prosecuting this minute comparison further. The doctrinal definitions in the Larger Catechism are, as I have said, in a great measure abridged from the Confession of Faith, and so far as they are not so they may generally be found in a shorter form in Ball's and NichoU's catechisms, in more diffuse form in Ussher's Body of Divinity P- The same may be said even ^ " God is a spirit, infinite in being and perfection." ^ Dr. Schaff supposes that the treatise of Wollebius entitled Compen - rfmm Theologice or "An abridgement of Christian Divinity," may also XXll INTRODUCTION. more -unreservedly of the exposition of the Ten Command- ments and of the Lord's Prayer as concerns Nicholl and Ussher. But one of the most singular and unexpected dis- closures brought to light in the recently published Minutes of the Assembly is that, while the early draft of a catechism in 1645 treated first of credenda, then of the ten com- mandments, and so left to the last the means of grace and the Lord's Prayer, and while the Larger Catechism as finally adjusted followed the same order, yet, as first entered on the Minutes of the Assembly in 1647, it treats of the means of grace or the word, sacraments, and prayer, before it expounds the commandments. In this it resembles the plan of Ball's and some other catechisms, showing that, if not in details, yet in outline and method, the divines fol- lowed some previous manual on the same plan as his — possibly that small one of date 1542, attributed to Calvin, — which, after being long lost, has been brought to light recently by M. Douen, and printed as an appendix to the second volume of his Huguenot Psalter. At least they follow its plan more exactly than that of Ball ; and the statement of Baillie, given on page xv, is sufficient to show that the question of method continued long to divide them. Their detailed and elaborate answers in the several parts of this catechism are, even when founded on previous treatises, carefully matured expansions of the answers given in these. I shall try to find room in the appendix to this introduction for one specimen of these, furnished by the rules they have provided for the exposition of the commandments, on the have been consulted. So also perhaps may the Exposition of the Heidel- berg Catechism by Ursinus. INTRODUCTION. XXlll principles set forth in our Lord's Sermon on the Mount. These rules had been more and more elaborated in the larger Puritan catechisms from the days of Whitaker and Cartwright to those of Ball and Ussher, and were finally- brought as near to perfection as they could well be by Dr. Gouge and Mr. Walker — the sub -committee appointed to prepare them — and having the help of Dr. Tuckney, who by that time was acting as chairman of the Committee on the Catechism, and is supposed to have taken a very special charge of the exposition of the ten commandments. The Larger Catechism was completed on 15th October 1647, read over in the Assembly on 20th by Dr. Burgess, and on the 2 2d was carried to the two Houses^ by the Prolocutor and the whole Assembly, when thanks were returned to them " for their great labour and pains in compiling this Long Catechism." It appears to have been presented in manuscript to the Scottish General Assembly in July 1647, so far as it was then completed, and on the 17th September certain alterations desired by their Commission were made at Westminster. It was approved in completed form by the next General Assembly on 20th July 1648.^ It was pre- sented to the English House of Commons with the proofs on 14th April 1648. The Shorter Catechism was not put in form till after the Larger one had been virtually completed, though it embodies more of the materials of the earlier manual, which had partially passed the Assembly in 1646, and is less directly drawn from the Confession of Faith than the other. Drs. ^ Lords' Journals, vol. ix. p. 488 ; Commons' Journals, vol. v. p. 340. * Peterkin's Records of Kirk, p. 496. XXIV INTRODUCTION. Belfrage, Hetlierington, aud the younger M'Crie, relying on Neal's account, have stated that the Shorter one was first completed and presented to Parliament. But Neal has fallen into the error of overlookinsf the fact, that the Laroer Catechism, without proofs, was presented to Parliament on 22d October 1647, as well as with proofs on 14th April 1648, while the Shorter Catechism, without proofs, was only sent up on 25th November 1647, and again with proofs on 14th April 1648.^ The following are the brief notices respecting it found in the Minutes of the Assembly. On 5th August 1647, it was resolved (p. 408) "that the Shorter Catechism shall be gone in hand with presently, by a committee now to be chosen," and ordered that " the Pro- locutor, Mr. Palmer, Dr. Temple, Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Greene, Mr. Delme, shall be this committee." It was to meet the same afternoon, and Mr. Palmer to take care of it, or be its convener. On August 9th "a report of the Short Catechism was made by Mr. Palmer, and Mr. Calamy and Mr. Gower were added to the committee." ^ This is the last occasion in which the Minutes notice the presence of Mr. Palmer in the Assembly, and shortly after he fell into a serious illness and died. On August 10th "Dr. Temple made report of the Lesser Catechism." On September 8th Mr. Wilson was added to the committee for the catechism, and the same day Mr. Wilson made report of the catechism. On September 16th a further order was given to proceed with the little catechism. It was not, however, till 1 9th October 1647, when the Larger Catechism was ready to be presented to the two Houses of Parliament, that orders were given to Messrs. 1 Minutes, pp. 485, 492, 511. ^ /^^^ pp 408-410. INTRODUCTION. XXV Tuckney,^ Marshall, and Ward, finally to adjust the Shorter one. Yet no doubt preparation was being made for it during the interval by the committee previously appointed, pro- bably along with Wallis, who ultimately attended the com- mittee as its secretary, and who in all likelihood had been privately assisting his friend Palmer with it during the last weeks of his life.^ On 21st October the first report from this new committee • was brought in by Tuckney, and dis- cussed. Some debate arose as to whether the word " sub- stance," or rather the expression " one in substance," in the answer to the question, " How many persons are there in the Godhead ?" should be left out. This, we know, was not done, but " one in substance " was changed into " the same in substance," a closer rendering of the Nicene o/xoovcrcof;, and the phrase " equal in substance, power and glory," originally used in the Larger Catechism, was changed to the same form as in the Shorter. No further particulars of the debates on this catechism are given in the Minutes, but nothing save formal business was transacted in the Assembly till it had been finished. On 8th November it is recorded that the commandments, Lord's Prayer, and creed were added to the catechism, and on the following day that Mr. Eutherfurd took his leave of the Assembly, receiving the thanks of the Assembly through the Prolocutor for the great assistance ihe had rendered to it in its labours and debates.^ On 1 Minutes, p. 485. Cambridge gave him leave of absence for a time. ^ He was evidently a protege of Palmer, and had on his recommendation 'been chosen as a fellow in Queens' College, Cambridge, of which Palmer I was master. ' ^ Minutes, pp. 487, 488. On 15th October, when the completion of the Larger Catechism was reported, Mr. Rutherfurd moved, and the Assembly ordered, "that it be recorded in the scribes' books that the C XXVI INTRODUCTION. the same day, Mr. Burgess and Mr. Cawdrey were added to the committee, along with Wallis, for the review of the catechism. All was again reviewed by the committee, and discussed by the Assembly before the 25th November. The brief statement originally prepared as a preface was appended as a postscript. Messrs. Nye and Eeynor dis- sented from the insertion of the Apostles' creed at the end of the catechism, but possibly the terms of the post- script just referred to, and the explanation added some days later as to the sense in which the article " he descended into hell" was to be understood, may have satisfied their scruples.^ Though in Scotland, as elsewhere, this catechism has been, and deservedly so, the most popular of all the productions of the Assembly, it was the one with the elabora- tion of which the Scotch Commissioners had least to do. Henderson had left and had died before the Confession was completed. Baillie left immediately after it was finished, and took down with him to Scotland a copy, the first edition of it, without proofs. Gillespie, after repeated petitions to be allowed to return home, received permission to leave in May 1647, when the proofs for the Confession had been completed, but while the debates on the Larger Catechism were still going on, and the answer to the question " What is God ? " — with which his name has been traditionally asso- Assembly hath enjoyed the assistance of the honourable, reverend, and learned commissioners from the Church of Scotland, in the work of the Assembly during all the time of the debating and perfecting the four things mentioned in the Covenant, viz., the Directory for Worship, the Confession of Faith, Form of Church-Government, and Catechism." — MinuteH, p. 484. 1 Ibid. pp. 490, 492. INTRODUCTION. xxvii ciated — had not as yet been adjusted for that Catechism, much less for the Shorter one.^ Even Eutherfurd had been seized with a fit of home-sickness, and wrote that he did not think the elaboration of this catechism of sufficient impor- tance to detain him from his college and his flock at St. Andrews. At any rate, though persuaded to remain till it had passed, so to speak, the first reading, he does not seem to have left his distinctive mark on it. Not the faintest trace of that wealth of homely imagery, which enriches the MS. catechism attributed to him, is to be found in the Assem- bly's Shorter Catechism. From first to last, in its clear, con- densed, and at times almost frigidly logical definitions, it appears to me to give unmistakable evidence of its having passed through the alembic of Dr. Wallis, the great mathe- matician, the protege and friend of Palmer, the opponent of Hobbes and the Socinians, and probably the last survivor of those connected with the great Assembly who was not ashamed to speak of the benefit he had derived from its ^ Even three months after he left London all that he was able to report to the Scottish Assembly respecting the catechisms was that the divines *' have had no time yet to do anything in the latter {i.e. shorter), but here is the copy of the greater, ivhichis almost complete.''^ The only instance in which we can be very sure that he has left his mark on the Confession is in that passage in ch. xxi, of his Miscellany Questions, pointed out some years ago by Professor Candlish as closely resembling chap. i. sect. v. of the Confession. Tradition, no doubt, has associated the name of George Gillespie with the answer to the question, " What is God ? " and the recent editor of Henderson's Sermons has made a similar claim for him. But, so far as the Minutes enable us to judge, the answer to that question, even in the Larger Catechism, was not moulded into the shape in which we now have it till after Henderson and Gillespie had returned to Scotland. It still remained somewhat in the same form which it bears in the earliest Catechism drafted by the Assembly, and in the catechetical manuals of Cartwright and Ussher. XXVlll INTRODUCTION. discussions during the preparation of its Confession and Catecliisms, long after he had conformed to the Church of the Eestoration, and taken to another line of study. Wodrowand both the M'Cries seem to look on the claim of Wallis with a certain amount of favour, while Dr. Belfrage refers to a •' theologian of great research " who favours that of Arrow- smith ; but that divine does not appear to have been a member of the committee, or in attendance on the Assembly, at the time this manual was prepared. The Shorter Catechism contains, as I have already ex- plained, more of the materials of the catechism partially passed by the Assembly in 1646, but not in a shape which brino's them nearer to the form of Palmer's orioinal o o work. On the contrary, it is a thoroughly Calvinistic and Puritan catechism, the ripest fruit of the Assembly's thought and experience, maturing and finally fixing the definitions of theological terms to wdiich Puritanism for half a century had been leading up and gradually coming closer and closer in its legion of catechisms. It difiers in one or two things even from the Larger Catechism, composed just before it. Its second question as to the rule of faith, if in more concise form than the third question of the other, is more direct and emphatic. Its definition of God is more happy, and, as already mentioned, is from a different source. It does not insert its definitions of faith and repentance where the other has them, but holds them over till its third part, when it comes to treat of the way of salvation and the means of grace. And while, as I have said, it is a thoroughly Calvin- istic catechism, it has nothing of church censures, church courts, or church officers, as many similar productions of the INTRODUCTION. XX IX Puritans have. ^&y, it does not even have a definition of the Church, whether visible or invisible, like the Larger Catechism and the Confession of Faith, but only an incidental reference to it in connection with the answer to the question, " To whom is baptism to be administered ? " It would seem as if in this their simplest yet noblest symbol the Assembly wished, as far as Calvinists could do so, to eliminate from their statements all that was subordinate or unessential — all relating to the mere organisation of Christians as an external community — all in which they differed from sound Protes- tant Episcopalians on the one liand, and from the less un- sound of the Sectaries on the other, and to make a supreme effort to provide a worthy catechism in which all the Protestant youth in the land might be trained. So highly was the effort appreciated at the time that the king (no doubt with the sanction of Ussher and his fellow- chaplains), in some of his latest negotiations with the Parliament, offered to license it, while still hesitating to accept the Directories for Public Worship and for Church Government as they had been drawn up by the Assembly. It was no sooner passed by the Parliament and published than it became widely popular in England, and it maintained its popularity in a wonderful degree even after the sad reverses which befel its authors in 1662. For more than a century after that, it was the most widely recognised manual of instruction, not only among Presbyterians but also among the other orthodox dissenters. The Independents used it both in England and in America. The Baptists used it with a very few alterations, and in the 18th century that gTeat evangelist, John Wesley, who was ever ready to adapt to his XXX INTRODUCTION. own purposes good books prepared by others holding opinions considerably different from his own, allowed it to circulate among his societies in a modified form. It was early trans- lated into Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and it has been retranslated in our own day into Hebrew, Syriac, and modern Greek, and into most modern languages both in the east and the west. When about twenty-eight years ago I visited the Lebanon schools, in the neighbourhood of Beyrout, I was greatly interested to find that the American missionaries not only taught this old catechism to the Druse and Maronite children, but also taught it in the old Scottish form which was still com- mon in last century but has now all but disappeared from the schools in Scotland. It formed, in fact, their first reading- book and had the A B C at the beginning, and a syllabary corresponding to our a, b, ab ; e, b, eb, etc., but of course all in orthodox Arabic. The guiding principle of the Assembly and its Committee in its composition was that announced by Dr. Seaman in one of the earliest debates about it, viz., " That the greatest care should be taken to frame the answer not according to the model of the knowledge the child hath, but according to that the child ought to have." And if too little care was taken in former times to teach it intelligently to the young, and gradually to open up its full meaning to them, yet, as Dr. M'Crie has well observed, " the objection was pushed too far when it was maintained that without a full scientific under- standing of its doctrines it is useless to acquire familiarity with their phraseology and contents. The pupil must learn the rudiments of Greek and Latin long before he can com- prehend the use of them, or apply them as a key to unlock INTRODUCTION. XXXI the treasures of ancient learning [in fact, in all Churches he is first taught his Christian creed in this way], and experience has shown that few who have been carefully instructed in our Shorter Catechism have failed to discover the advantage of becoming acquainted in early life, even as a task, with that admirable form of sound words." For three quarters of a century past, I do not believe that intelligent teachers of the Catechism have been rare, either in the parochial or in the Sabbath schools of Scotland, and with the helps with which Gall and others, who have drawn on the older stores of Wallis and Palmer and Lye, have provided them, there is no excuse for any teacher making the study of it an irksome task, or failing in a good measure to bring it down to the capacities and home to the hearts of his pupils. I am but fulfilling a simple duty when I thus publicly express my deep gratitude to my teachers, both in the day-school and in the Sabbath-school, for the uniform pains they took to make the study of it interesting and attractive. I can confidently affirm that I found their instructions of no small advantage when I proceeded to the more systematic study of theology, and I shall never lose hope of the living orthodoxy of the Presbyterian Churches while their rising ministry and Church members are intelligently and affectionately trained in the Shorter Catechism, and set themselves to train their flocks in it earnestly and affectionately, as good old Principal Hill used to recommend them to do. In the first part of the following collection I have given the text of this much-prized Catechism from one of the earliest English editions, and have endeavoured pretty fully to trace out the sources of its several answers in earlier XXXll INTRODUCTION. Catechisms, or at least to indicate the many points of contact and resemblance between these answers and those of earlier Puritan treatises, several of which had proceeded from mem- bers of the Assembly. And I have added in whole or in part those manuals which seem to have been most closely followed and deserve to be most carefully compared. The exercise has been interesting to myself, and I trust its results will not be uninteresting to many of my brethren. It shows how gradually in the stream of successive catechisms those de- finitions of theological terms which were ultimately to be perfected and crystallised, so to speak, at Westminster, were developed and matured, and more and more widely accepted. I cannot, within the limits to which this intro- duction must be restricted, enter into details ; but I may say generally, that so far as plan and the order of the questions or interrosjatories is concerned, I still reojard the little cate- chism of Ezekiel Eogers, who was a minister first in York- shire, and latterly in Xew England, as most closely resembling the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. The answers in his little treatise are much more simple and elementary, the exposi- tion of the ten commandments is in the briefest possible form, and the verbal coincidences in individual answers are few. But all is there in miniature, and almost all in the same order as in the later and fuller catechism. The plan of M. IS'.'s (as I suppose, Nicholl's or Newcomen's) Catechism is very similar also, the execution is much more detailed, especially in the exposition of the command- ments, and particular answers frequently coincide in expres- sion as well as in general meaning with those of the Shorter Catechism. The chief de^iation is, that it, like INTRODUCTION. XXXlli that of the Church of England and several of the more moderate Puritan catechisms, begins by reminding the catechumen of his baptism, and of the privileges and responsibilities connected with it. Next perhaps in point of resemblance stand the catechisms of Gouge and Ball. The author of the former was, like Newcomeu, an influential member of the Assembly, and his treatise has many verbal coincidences with that prepared by them, but it deviates so far from it in plan by placing the exposition of the com- mandments before the explanation of the doctrines of the Christian faith. A similar remark applies to Ball's treatise, entitled a Shorter Catechism. It has decidedly more verbal coincidences with the Assembly's Shorter Catechism in the answers to particular questions, but it deviates further in plan, treating first of doctrine, then of the means of grace, preaching, prayer, exposition of the Lord's Prayer and of the sacraments, of the Church and Church censures, and finally expounding the commandments, and concluding with a few general questions. Palmer's catechism, as already stated, is similar in general plan, with the exception that, like the Anglican Catechism, it treats of prayer and the Lord's Prayer before it treats of the sacraments, and that it moulds its exposition of doctrine closely on the Apostles' Creed. It was unquestionably on the basis of the first part of it that the divines began to work in 1645, but so many of its historical questions have been omitted in the course of their successive revisions, and so much that was needed to explain and define important doctrines of the Christian system has been added, that the similarity is not now so marked in that first part, much less in the other parts, as, XXXI \- INTRODUCTION. Irani the fact mentioned, one might have expected. The only trace the Shorter Catechism perhaps now bears of having been moulded on one which had the Apostles' Creed for the basis of its first or doctrinal part, is, that at the close of that part it takes account only of the eternal state of believers. But, strange as the fact may seem, it deviates in this from Palmer's, and from almost every other catechism — NichoU's, however, as in so many other things, coming nearest to it. The only way in which one, who knows how strongly its authors speak in other parts of the desert of sin and the endless misery in reserve for the impenitent, can account for no reference being made to these topics in this place is, that the divines were expounding the last article of the Apostles' Creed, and had in view only the case of those who could truly say, " I believe in the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting," and did not deem themselves bound even incidentally to advert to the future of those who had neither part nor lot in Christ and His great salvation. In the second part of this work I have given two of the Scottish catechisms of the period which were actually in use. One of these was published in England, just before the Assembly entered on this part of its labours, and (I can hardly doubt) in the hope that it might tend to facilitate them. The catechism of Eutherfurd and the two others,* ^ They are still preserved in a ms. in the library of the University of Edinburgh, to which the curators of the library have kindly given me access. The first of these is entitled "Ane Catechisme conteining the soume of Christian Religion, by Mr. Samuell Rutherfurd." The second bears the title, "Another, by Mr. Thomas Wylie," probably the same who was minister first at Borgue, and afterwards at Mauchline. The third, which is quite fragmentary, containing only the two articles of "Man's Delivery," and of the " Birth of Regeneration," bears no title ; but INTRODUCTION. XXXV which have never hitherto been published, have been added partly from their origin and worth, and the interest which must ever attach to them on both accounts, and partly because there can be hardly any doubt that they also were prepared for the purpose of being laid before the committee of the Assembly, and in the hope they might meet its approval. In this, however, the hopes and wishes of the Scotch Com- missioners were doomed to disappointment. And they seem to have borne the disappointment well — Eutherfurd especially so, and to have aided very cordially in the elaboration of those which were ultimately framed and adopted. The title sanctioned by the English Parliament for the Shorter Catechism was not that originally fixed on by the Assembly itself, and by which it is now universally known, but the following expansion of it : — " The grounds and Principles of Eeligion contained in a Shorter Catechism (according to the advice of the Assembly of Divines sitting at Westminster), to be used throughout the kingdom of both the handwriting, and the fact that it is written on the back of a letter addressed ' ' To the Right Reverend Mr. Robert Blair, minister of God's Word at St. Andrews, in Scotland," seem to warrant our ascribing it to that eminent man, who from 1639 had been Rutherfurd's colleague in St. Andrews. The late Mr. David Laing believed that the first of these is in the handwriting of Rutherfurd, and there is strong internal evidence that it must have been drawn up by him. The spelling and diction are somewhat antique, but a careful perusal will satisfy most that it would be difficult to name any one among the worthies of that age, save the author of the Letters, who could have drawn up a Catechism so rich in imagery, so full and practical in all that relates to the origin and progress of the divine life in the soul, containing so many of his favourite modes of expression, and so thoroughly moulded according to the system expanded in his larger theological works. Wylie's Catechism is, to a large extent, an abridgment of Rutherfurd's, but exhibits sufficient internal evidence of distinct authorship. That of Blair is only a fragment, but it seems to be part of an independent treatise. XXXVl INTRODUCTION. England and dominion of Wales." ^ This seems to have met with the approval of the divines. At least ten or twelve editions of it with this title were published in England before 1720, one of which I have now secured. Between 21st October and 19th November the Catechism may be said to have passed the first and second reading in the Assembly, and, without the proofs, it was presented to the House of Commons on the 25th, and to the House of Lords on the 26th ]N"ovember. It was presented with proofs on 14th April 1648, and by 25th September 1648 it had been j)assed by the Houses, with the above title. It was approved by the General Assembly of the Church of Scot- land on 28th July 1648, and their Acts in regard to it and the Larger Catechism were ratified by the Estates of the Scottish Parliament on 7th February 1649. No express mention is made of it or of the Larger Catechism in the Act re-establishing Presbytery after the Pie volution, but it has always retained its place of honour in the Presbyterian Churches in Scotland, and elsewhere, as the most widely known and most greatly valued of our doctrinal symbols. Eichard Baxter's opinion of this Catecliism was very high, and his testimony to its merits very emphatic : " I do heartily approve," he says, " of the Shorter Catechism of the Assembly and of all therein contained, and I take it for the best' cate- chism that ever I yet saw, and the answers continued (that is, I suppose, read continuously) form a most excellent summary of the Christian faith and doctrine, and a fit test to try the orthodoxy of teachers themselves." Nay, he adds that, " for the innate worth of it, he prefers it to any of the ^ For procedure of the Houses respecting it see Minutes of Assembly, p. 511. INTRODUCTION. XXXVll writings of the Fathers, and that he takes the labours of the Assembly, and especially the confession and catechisms, as the best book next his Bible in his study." The sainted Leighton seems also to have had a high opinion of it, and admits that the thoughts we find in it on the awful subject of the divine decrees "are few, sober, clear, and certain." Principal Hill speaks with high commendation of the Cate- chism and the system of teaching it followed by the ministers of his day : " Considered as a system of divinity," he says, "this catechism is entitled to much admiration. It has nothing superfluous ; the words are chosen with uncommon skill, and the answer to almost every question is a text on which a person versant in such subjects can easily enlarge, . . . and in the hands of an experienced, attentive examiner . . . the catechism may be made completely to answer the purpose of leading the people to the apprehension of Christian doctrine and of the extent of Christian duty." The opinion of Dr. Schaff in our own day, if, as becomes a German, somewhat more guarded than Baxter's, is hardly less remarkable. He says : " The Shorter Catechism is one of the three typical catechisms of Protestantism which are likely to last to the end of time. It is fully equal to Luther's and to the Heidelberg Catechism in ability and influence ; it far surpasses them in clearness and careful wording (or, as he elsewhere says, in brevity, terseness, and accuracy of definition), and is better adapted to the Scottish and Anglo- American mind ; but it lacks their genial warmth, freshness, and child-like simplicity." Perhaps quite as noteworthy are the words he quotes from Carlyle, who, when testifying against modern materialism, thus expressed himself : " The XXXVlll INTRODUCTION. older I grow — and I now stand upon the "brink of eternity — the more comes back to me the first sentence in the Catechism, which I learned when a child, and the fuller and deeper its meaning becomes : ' What is the chief end of man ? — To glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.' " BRIEF BIOGRAPHICAL XOTICES of the Authors of the Catechisms here reprinted, and of some others "who wrote Catechisms who were members of the West- minster Assembly or of its Committee on the Catechism.^ THE REV. EZEKIEL EOGERS. EzEKiEL Rogers, son of Richard and brother of Daniel Rogers, was born at AYethersfield, Essex, in 1590. He entered the University in his thirteenth year, and in his twentieth took his degrees in Arts. After being for six years domestic chaplain to Sir Francis Barrington, he was presented by him to the benefice of Rowley, in Yorkshire. His church was situated in the centre of a number of villages which supplied him with a large congregation, and many were brought to the knowledge of the truth as it is in Jesus, under his ministry. Brook tells us that "by the encouragement or connivance of Archbishop Matthews of York, the lectures or prophesyings, put down in the days of Queen Elizabeth, were again re^^ved." These lectures were the means of difi^using the light of the Gospel into many dark comers of the land, particularly in Y^orkshire. The ministers within a certain district held their monthly assemblies, when one or two of them preached, and others praj^ed, before a numerous and attentive conc^re2:ration. Mr. Roofers took an active part in these exercises as long as the archbishop lived. From one of these public lectures, a vile accuser waited upon the archbishop, and charged one of the ministers with having prayed, " that God would shut the archbishop out of heaven." The worthy prelate, who had a keen sense of humour, instead of being offended, as the slanderer expected, only smiled, and said, " Those good men know well enough that if I were gone to heaven, their exercises would soon be put down." The ' These notices are compiled chiefly from Wood's Athencu Oxonienses, Brook's Lives of the Puritans, Palmer's Nonconformists' Memorial, Eeid's Lices of the Westminster Divines, Xeal's History, Killen's History of fJu Church in Ireland, &c. xl BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. words of the good archbishop were, indeed, found true ; for his head was no sooner laid in the dust than they were put down. Mr. Rogers, having preached at Rowley about thirty years, was silenced for nonconformity ; but, as some kind of recompence, he was allowed the profits of his living for two years, and per- mitted to put another in his place. He made choice of one Mr. Bishop for his successor ; who, for refusing to read publicly the censure passed upon Mr. Rogers, was himself presently "silenced." In 1638, having no prospect of restoration to the ministry in his own country, Mr. Rogers embarked, along with a number of his Yorkshire friends, at Hull, for New England. On arriving there he settled at a place which, after the name of his Yorkshire charge, he termed Rowley. At that place he continued his ministry for many years with great success. His conversation among his people was earnest and edifying. He took great pains in the religious instruction of the young — " he was a tree of knowledge from which even children might pluck and eat without harm." Nor was he forgetful of the need of the higher education in such a new and growing community, and before his death he was able to make such provision for it as should cause him to be held in lasting remembrance by the descendants of tlie New England colonists. His later years were clouded by many trials and sufferings. He died in 1660, in the seventieth year of his age. He left his library and other benefactions to Harvard College, and made provision for the support of a minister of the Gospel at Rowley. His catechism, entitled The Chief e Grounds of Christian Religion set down hj icay of Catechising^ was composed while its author was still on this side of the Atlantic, and probably ere he was suspended from his ministry in Yorkshire, for it purports to have been " gathered long since for the use of an honourable family." The only copies of it which I have seen are one in the British Museum and another in a volume of Puritan catechisms belonging to the library of the New College in Edinburgh. This last bears the date of 1642. As I have said elsewhere, it contains in miniature almost all that is in the Shorter Catechism of the Westminster Assembly. It is decidedly similar to it in plan and type of doctrine, though the verbal coincidences are by no means so numerous as in some of the other catechisms reprinted in this volume. REV. JOHN BALL. xli THE KEY. JOHX BALL. John Ball was born at Cassenton, in Oxfordshire, of humble parents. He entered Brasenose College in 1602, and took his degree in Arts in 1608. In 1610 he was ordained in London by an Irish bishop without the subscriptions then required in England, and was appointed minister at Whitmore, near Xewcastle-under-Lyne. His stipend is said to have been but £10 a year, and he was obliged to eke out a scanty sub- sistence by teaching a school or acting as chaplain and tutor in a gentleman's family in the neighbourhood. He was a moderate Puritan, but opposed to separation from the Church ; and in later life he wrote against the extreme views of some of his own party regarding the Liturgy and ceremonies of the Church. He suffered much for his nonconformity and " holding conventicles," as his preachings in private houses were termed ; but he also experienced much kindness at the hands of Lady Bromley, a great patroness of the Nonconformists in that quarter. He was deeply versed in the Popish and Arminian controversies, felicitous in the explanation of difficult texts, and successful in comforting the distressed in conscience. " He excelled greatly in prayer, administering the sacraments, and conducting the exercises of family religion. He died on 20th October 1640, saying, 'I am going to heaven.'" Brook gives a full and laudatory account of him. Men of such diverse opinions as Antony Wood, Fuller, and Xeale have supplied brief but very favourable notices of him; and Baxter, com- menting, like the others, on his straitened income and high qualities of head and heart, says, " he deserved as high esteem and honour as the best bishop in England." His chief work, published during his lifetime, bore the title, A Treatise of Faith, divided into two parts, the first shoicing the Nature, and the second the Life of Faith, etc. It was long held in high esteem, and passed through two or three editions ; a copy in my own possession belonged to the well-known Lady Glenorchy. Ball also, as has been mentioned above, published several treatises against the Separatists and the more extreme Puritans. But the most valuable of his writinsrs, in a theological point of view, was that d xlii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. published, after his death in 1645, by Mr. Simeon Ashe, and entitled, A Treatise of the Covenant of Grace. This treatise shows incontrovertibly that there was a fully developed " doctrine of the Covenants" taught in Britain before the time of the AVest- minster Assembly, and apparently more harmoniously accepted than that which soon after ^vas promulgated by Cocceius, and gave rise to such bitter controversy in Holland. The recom- mendatory notice, prefixed to the book by Calamy, Reynolds, and other divines of the Assembly, makes reference to his catechism and the exposition thereof, so that, unquestionably, both of these were well known and esteemed by several of the leading members of the Assembly. His catechism, entitled A Short CaterJmme contayning the Principles of Religion, had passed through twelve editions by 1628, and through thirty-four by 1653. It was translated into some foreign languages. William Seaman, M.D., son of Dr. Lazarus Seaman, who translated the Shorter Catechism of the Assembly into Hebrew, translated Ball's Catechism into Turkish. His larger catechism, entitled A Short Treatise contayning all the principall Grounds of Christian Religion, was at first a simple exposition of the several questions in his "short catechism;" but, after it had been passed through two or three editions, it also was digested into the form of ques- tions and answers subordinate to those of the other work. This was done either by the author himself or by one of his collabora- teurs, and the exposition in this form passed through several editions. A copy of it was discovered about Philadelphia in our own time, and a large sum was demanded for it by the fortunate possessor ; but the book is not by any means a rare one, and does not usually command a large price in Britain. ARCHBISHOP JAMES USSHER. James Ussher was born in Dublin on Ith January 1580-1. His father was one of the clerks of Chancery. His uncle was Archbishop of Armagh. He is said to have been first taught to read by his aunts, who had been blind from their cradles, but had such tenacious memories that they could repeat almost any portion of the Scriptures. At eight years of age he was trans- ferred to the grammar school, and profited greatly by the ARCHBISHOP USSHEll. xliii instructious of the two able Scotchmen who had charge of it. At thirteen he passed to the University, and is said to have been the first who enrolled in the new institution. He pro- secuted his studies there with great enthusiasm and success, distinguishing himself equally by his high talents and unremit- ting application. He devoted himself with special zest to the study of theology under the guidance of Travers, the well- known Puritan opponent of Hooker. " AYhen a mere boy, Ussher was brought under deep religious impressions ; and throughout life he maintained the character of a man of undoubted and consistent godliness. When but a youth of eighteen he ventured to encounter Henry Fitzsymonds, a learned Jesuit, in a public disputation on the questions debated between Romanists and Protestants. He acquitted himself with such dexterity and skill that, after two or three conferences, the Jesuit withdrew from the arena. This affair had prol)ably some influence in shaping his future line of study ; for, some time afterwards, he commenced a laborious examination of the works of the Chris- tian Fathers. For eighteen years he was employed in this herculean task. Every day he devoted so many hours to the perusal of them, and he thus in the end became more profoundly acquainted with patristic literature than perhaps any other theologian of the seventeenth century." Xor was he less at home in the theology of the Reformation ; and he had for his life-long correspondents the most eminent ministers of the French and Dutch Reformed Churches. Before he was admitted to the lowest office in the ministry he was permitted to preach on the Romish controversy in one of the Dublin cathedrals, in presence of the members of the Irish Government ; and when only twenty-one years of age he was ordained deacon and priest on the same day. He became M.A. in 1600, B.D. in 1607, and D.D. in 1612. He received his first appointment from Archbishop Loftus, and in 1607 he was promoted to be Professor of Divinity, and in 1610 Provost of Trinity College, Dublin. In 1621 he w^as appointed by King James to the bishopric of Meath, and in 1625 to the archbishopric of Armagh. In 1615, when the first Irish Convocation met, and signalised itself by the adoption of detailed doctrinal articles, Ussher was the divine intrusted with the compilation of this important xliv BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. symbol, which is a fair sample of his theology. " It consists of one hundred and four articles, divided into nineteen sections, and is thoroughly evangelical in its tone. It sets forth with great distinctness those views of the Divine decrees so lucidly propounded by Augustine and Calvin. It teaches that the Scriptures are able to instruct sufficiently in all points of doctrine and duty, and that we are justified by faith without our own works or deservings. It makes no mention of the three orders of bishops, priests, and deacons. It asserts that the Lord's Day is it-hoUy to be dedicated unto the service of God, and that the Bishop of Rome is that man of sin foretold in the Holy Scriptures, whom the Lord shall consume with the breath of His mouth, and abolish with the brightness of His coming. This elaborate formulary, when adopted, was signed by Jones, Archbishop of Dublin ; by the Prolocutor of the other House of the Clergy, in their names ; and by the Lord-Depute Chichester, in name of the Sovereign." It is undoubtedly the main source from which the Westminster Confession is drawn. AVhen he became a bishop, Ussher " made it his business to reclaim those deluded people who had been bred up in the Roman Catholic religion from their infancy ; for which end he began to converse more frequently and more familiarly with the gentry and nobility of that persuasion, as also with diverse of the inferior sort that dwelt near him, inviting them often to his house, and discoursing with them with great mildness of the chief tenets of their religion ; by which gentle usage he was strangely successful in convincing many of them of their errors, and bringing them to the knowledge of the truth. . . . He listened with interest to the reports of the great revival under the Scottish ministers in Down and Antrim ; . . . invited Blair to his house at Drogheda, treated him during his visit with marked kindness, obtained from him a minute account of his theological sentiments, and was gratified to find that his guest held identically his own views of the articles of the Christian Faith. He stated that he had been importuned to stretch forth his hand against them : he declared, though he would not for the world do that, he was afraid instruments would be found to undertake it ; and he added that it would break his heart if their successful ministry in the north were interrupted." But DR. WILLIAM TWISSE. xlv with all his noble qualities and immense learning, he was more of a scholar than an administrator and ecclesiastical leader, and for some years fell to a certain extent under the fascination of that singular little man, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who, with a narrower mind, a more superficial scholarship, and a far less healthy form of piety, had acquired the art of governing men, and bore in his busy brain the burden of all the Churches in Britain. After the fall of Laud, Ussher strove in vain to repair the mischief he had wrought, and to turn the thoughts of men towards peace and accommodation. He finally left Ireland in 1640, remained for two years in liondon, and then removed to Oxford. He left Oxford in 1645, and, after spending rather more than a year in ^Vales, he returned to London in June 1646, and was again appointed a member of the Assembly. Soon after he was chosen preacher at Lincoln's Inn, and con- tinued to officiate there till his sight and strength failed him. During these years he found a home with the Countess of Peter- 1)orough, whose husband many years before he had been honoured to bring over to the Protestant faith. He died on 26th March 1656, and was honoured by the Protector with a public funeral. The earliest editions of his two small catechisms which I have seen are those in the British Museum, published in 1645 and 1646 ; but the}'' were composed by him in early life — probably like the Body of Divinitij, which bears his name, while he w^as teaching tlieology in Dublin. But the catechisms were owned and revised by him in later life, while the larger treatise does not seem to have been owned by him save as a compilation which in early life he had made from the writings of others, who were then in repute as orthodox divines, and not as an accurate representation of his own matured opinions. THE REV. WILLIAM TWISSE, D.D. William Twisse, or Twiste, is said on his father's side to have been of German descent, but he was born at Speenham- Land, near Newbery, in Berkshire, in 1575. He was educated at AVinchester School, and, like other Wykeliamists, was transferred from it to New College, Oxford, where he became M.A., and a fellow in 1604. He then took orders, and prosecuted the study xlvi BiOGRArirrcAL notices. of theology for a number of years, and is said to have assisted Sir John Savile in bringing out his edition of Bradwardine's great work, De Causa Dei contra Felagium. In 1614 he took his doctor's degree, and went abroad as chaplain to tlie Princess Elizabeth, daughter of James YI. and wife of the Elector Palatine. He returned to England after a few years, and be- came vicar, or perpetual curate, of Newber}^, his native parish. In 1626 he refused to read the proclamation regarding the Book of Sjjorts, and wrote a treatise on the morality of the Fourth Commandment ; but on account of his great eminence, and the esteem in which he was held by foreign Protestants, he was borne with, while others who followed a similar course were harshly treated. On the outbreak of the civil war he was urged by Prince Rupert, the son of Princess Elizabeth, to cast in his lot with the king ; but he declined to do so, and his house and library in consec[uence were pillaged by the Royalist troops, and he had for safety to withdraw Irom his parish and seek shelter in London. He was put by the Committee on Plundered Ministers into the sequestrated rectory of St. Andrew's, Hol- born. In 1643 he was named by the Parliament as a member, and appointed Prolocutor of the AVestminster Assembly, and occasionally, at least in the debates on the English articles, he took part in the discussions of the Assembly. He did not come up to Baillie's idea of what the moderator of such an Assembly should be ; but if vast learning, subtile speculative genius, and European fame could give claims to such an office, his were undoubted, and possibly in the matters for which Baillie blames him he only followed the traditions of the Prolo- cutor of the English Convocation, or of the Speaker of the English House of Commons. He belonged to the Supralap- sarian school of Calvinists, and published several learned and voluminous works in Latin against tlie Arminians and Jesuits, which commanded the admiration of Bishop Hall. In several of the debates of the Assembly on the English articles he, like Gataker, evinced considerably more liberality than might have been expected from an adherent of so pronounced a school. His little catechism was first issued in 1633, apparently without his name, and of that edition there are copies in various public lil)raries. The only copy of the sul^sequent REV. JOHN wuri'K. xlvii edition bearing his name which I have seen is in the British Museum. It seems to have been very little consulted by the Committee on the Catechisms. The one or two answers in which there is any resemblance to that which was the fruit of these long labours will be found noted under the respective questions, pp. 23, 24, 26. Twisse continued to officiate at Holborn, and occasionally at least to attend the Assembly at Westminster, till one day he fell down in the pulpit when preaching, and, after a lingering illness of nearly a year's duration, died in 1646. The deputa- tion of the Assembly who visited him on his deathbed found him " in great straits," — the allowance promised by the Parlia- ment having been very irregularly paid to him, as also the income from his sequestration. His last words are said to have been — "Now I shall have leisure to follow my studies to all eternity." A public funeral was awarded him, and a place of sepulchre in Westminster Abbey; but at the Restoration his body, along with the bodies of several others, was dug up and cast into a pit in St. Margaret's Churchyard. THE REY. JOHN WHITE. John White was born at Staunton, near Woodstock, Oxford- shire, about Christmas, 1574. His father being a tenant of New College, and connected by descent with Hampshire, his son was sent first to Winchester School, and then from it to New College, Oxford. He rose to be a fellow in the college, and took his degree in Arts about 1597. About 1606 he was appointed rector of Trinity Church, Dorchester, where he laboured for many years with great fidelity and success. He became known as the patriarch of Dorchester, and had more authority with many than the bishop of the diocese ; yea, according to Fuller, had " much influence both in Old and New England," having taken a very active part in the establishment of the colony of Massachusetts. In the course of his ministry he is said to have lectured once through the whole of the Scriptures and half way through them a second time. In the civil war he took the side of the Parliament, and when the dashing Prince Rupert came into those parts his Cavaliers were xlviii BIOUKAPHICAL NOTICES. allowed to plunder the rectory and cany off the rector's library. White thereupon removed to London, where he was made Master of the Savoy, and appointed a member of the West- minster Assembly and one of the assessors to its prolocutor. After Dr. Featley's expulsion from the Assembly, White was appointed to occupy his sequestrated rectory of Lambeth, and to enjoy the use of his library till his own should be restored. He was offered, but declined, the Mastership of New College, Oxford, and after the civil war was over he seems to have left the Assembly and returned to spend his last days at his beloved Dorchester. He was one of those who officiated at St. Margaret's, Westminster, on the memorable occasion when the Solemn League and Covenant was taken by the House of Commons, but he does not seem to have taken any very active part in the business of the Assembly. He was married to the sister of Dr. Burgess, his co-assessor, and he is said to have been the maternal great-grandfather of the Weslej^s. His cate- chism, entitled A Plaine and Familiar Exposition upon the Creed, X. Commandments, Lord's Prayer, and Sacraments, etc., passed through several editions, and, save in the introduction, is identical with that of Josias White, his elder brother, though probably this last Avas the copyist. Antony Wood says of him, " He was a person of great gravity and presence, and one of the most learned and moderate in the Assembly." Fuller says, " He was grave without moroseness, and would contribute liis shot of facetiousness on any just occasion. By his wisdom the town of Dorchester was much enriched, knowledge causing piety, piety industry, and industry procuring plenty unto it." THE REV. HENRY WILKINSON, B.D. Henry Wilkinson, senior, was l)orn in the vicarage at Halifax in 1566, and was probably therefore the oldest member of the Westminster Assembly. He entered Merton College, Oxford, of which his relative. Sir Henry Savile, was head, in 1581, and in due course took his degree in Arts, and was appointed to a fellowship. In 1597 he proceeded to the degree of B.D. In 1601 he became minister of Waddesdon, in Buckinghamshire, where he laboured with great zeal and fidelity for nearly REV. HENRY WILKINSON. xllX forty-six years. He was brought into trouble in 1640 on account of a sermon he preached before the University, and was suspended from his office ; but he was released from this suspension by the Long Parliament, and soon after he was nominated by them as one of the members of the Assembly of Divines. As already mentioned, he was probably the oldest member, and he seems to have been by that time in failing health, as at least three several times it is recorded in the minutes that one of the brethren had been sent to visit him. Like White, he seems to have returned to his parish in the country in 1646-7, and he died at Waddesdon on 19th March 1647-8, and was interred in the chancel of his ow^n church, leaving, according to the inscription on his tombstone, an " example of a most upright and holy life, and a reputation scarcely to be exceeded." He was the author of several dis- courses, and of a catechism which passed at least through four editions ; the following is its title : — " A Cateclmme, contayning a short exposition of the points in the ordinary Catechisme, with 2)roofes of the same out of Scripture, set forth for the ttse of such as desire to be catechised in the coiigregation of JVadsdon, in Buckinghamshire, or elseichere, by Henry Wilkinson, Bachelor in Divinity.''' It treats first of the Ten Commandments, after that of the Apostles' Creed, and the Sacraments, and then of the Lord's Prayer. It says of God, "He is one Jehovah, infinite in power, wdsdom, holiness, mercy, justice, goodness, eternity," etc. A long prayer is appended to the catechism, which con- cludes as follows : — "Let thy Sabbaths be our delight, let thy promises be our stay and comfort in these conflicting daies of sin. Lord, sanctifie us throughout, accomplish the good worke which thou hast begun in us, seale us up to the day of redemp- tion, prepare us for thine everlasting kingdom : set thy hedge about us and al that we have, let not Sathan breake in upon us, let not us breake out from thee. Finally, let us so live in thy feare, that we may dye in thy favour ; and, being faithfull unto death, we may receive the crowne of life by the merits and obedience of our Redeemer Jesus Christ ; in whose name we further call upon thee as he himself hath taught us. Our Father which art in Heaven,'' etc. BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. THE EEV. WILLIAM GOUGE, D.D. AViLLiAM Gouge was born at Stratford-le-Bow, Middlesex, in L575, and was educated partly at St. Paul's School, London, and partly at Eton College. He entered King's College, Cambridge, in L595, where he studied with great diligence, and in due course became M.A., and was elected fellow of his college. He became B.D. in 1611, and D.D. in 1628. During the nine years he was in the college it is said that he never, when resident, was absent from morning j^i'ayers, and that he was wont to read fifteen chapters of the Scriptures daily, at three separates time, namely, morning, noon, and evening. He studied Hebrew under a Jewish rabbi, and taught it as well as logic and philosophy. In 1607 he was ordained, and in the following year was appointed to the church of St. Ann's, Black- friars, London, which he held for nearly forty-six years, saying that he wished to go from Blackfriars to heaven. Besides other perferment, which he was oftered but declined, was the Master- ship of King's College, Cambridge. In 1621 he was imprisoned for nine weeks for republishing Finch's CaJling of the Jens. In early life he drew up a catechism, which, after being privately circulated and surreptitiously published, was revised and given to the public by himself It is entitled A Short Catechisme, wherein (ire briefly handled the FundamentaJl Principles of Christian lleligion needfiill to he learned of all Christians before they come to the Lord's Table, and comprises a large and a short or abridged catechism, with prayers appended. It had reached the eighth edition by 1636. The Short Catechism only is reprinted in the following volume, along with the prayer in which its teaching is summed up, and in which is found in rudimentary form that definition of God which tradition attributes to the oldest or the youngest member of the Westminster Assembly. His definition of God as "a Spirit of infinite perfection" comes very near to that at first favoured by tlie Assembly (Note 3, p. xx), and by Palmer (Note 1, p. xxi). Besides various volumes of sermons, which from time to time he gave to the public, he prepared for the press an exhaustive commentary on tlie Epistle to the Hebrews. This REV. HERBERT PALMER. li comprised the substance of a thousand lectures delivered in his church, and was published by his son in 1655, in two vols., folio. He was appointed a member of the Westminster Assembly in 1643, and was a member of several important committees, especially of those intrusted with the preparation of the Confession of Faith and Catechisms. He occasionally took part in the debates of the Assembly, and in 1647 was chosen assessor in succession to Mr. Palmer. The same year he was appointed Prolocutor of the first Provincial Assembly of London. He died, in December 1653, in his seventy-ninth year. He was exemplary in the discharge of all ministerial duties, and was greatly respected and beloved. Wood says, "He was esteemed the father of the London Puritan ministers, a pious and learned preacher, and is often honourably mentioned by Voetius, Streso, and other foreign divines." Fuller enrols him among the worthies of King's College, and Granger affirms that he was so much beloved that none ever thought or spoke ill of him excepting those who were inclined to think or speak ill of religion itself. Archbishop Ussher is said occasionally to have attended on his ministry in the later years of his residence in London. THE EEV. HERBERT PALMER, B.D., Herbert Palmer, younger son of Sir Thomas Palmer, was born at Wingham, Kent, on 29th March 1601, and was early brought to the knowledge of the truth by a pious mother. He entered St. John's College, Cambridge, in 1615, became M.A. in 1622, and was chosen fellow and tutor of Queens' College in 1623. In the following year he was ordained, and in 1626 he was admitted as a minister or lecturer in St. Alphege Church, Canterbury. There he enjoyed the friendship of Delme, the pastor of the French church, who, like himself, was afterwards to be a member of the Westminster Assembly. Being able to speak French fluently, he once or twice offici- ated for his friend. He is said to have been an " earnest, moving, and faithful preacher." About 1632 he was pre- sented by Archbishop Laud to the vicarage of Ashwell, in Herts. In 1643 he was named as one of the members of the Westminster Assembly, and soon after was admitted minis- Ill BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. ter, first of Duke's Place Church, Loudon, and then of New Church, Westminster, and lie was also appointed one of the morning lecturers in Westminster Abbey. He was small of stature and somewhat deformed. He was a ready and efifective speaker, and took an active part in the proceedings of the Assembly and its committees. He belonged to the more moderate Presbyterian party, and it greatly grieved the heart of Baillie that in the debates on the divine right of ruling elders, even "learned, gracious, little Palmer" was unconvinced by the Scottish arguments. He was a member of the Committee on Accommodation, and is said to have drafted the papers on ordination in reply to the Independents, which were finally published in 1648. But his most important work in the Assembly, as already stated in the preceding Introduction, was in connection with the Committee on the Catechisms, over the deliberations of which he presided from the time of its first appointment till his death. Early in 1647 he was appointed assessor to the Prolocutor in room of White of Dorchester. In 1644 he was appointed Master of Queens' College, Cam- bridge, with the approval of the Assembly, but he seems still to have remained chiefly in London, and the few entries regarding him in the books of Queens' College merely record the fact that leave of absence v/as granted him that he might attend upon the business of the Assembly, and that John Wallis, the famous mathematician, was taken into tlie number of fellows on his recommendation. He died about the end of August 1647, after a brief illness. Granger says he was a man of uncommon learning, generosity, and politeness ; Reid adds, " his conversa- tion was holy and heavenly; he lived piously and died cheerfully." An interesting biography of him is preserved in manuscript in the British Museum, the most essential parts of which have been given to the public l)y Dr. Grosart, in the treatise in which he vindicates for him the authorship of the Ckridian Paradoxes, long attributed to Lord Bacon. Besides these and the catechism, of which the first part is reprinted in this volume, Palmer was the author of a Avork entitled Memorials of Godliness and Chrisiianity, which passed through a number of editions. He was joint author with Dr. Cawdrey of an important work on the Sabbath question, bearing tlie title Vhidk'm Sahhathi. KEV. DANIEL CAWDREY. liii Several of his sermons, preached before the Houses of Parh'a- ment, were also published, and among them one which brought on him the wrath of Milton by its denunciation of the poet's views on divorce and the liberty of unlicensed printing. His catechism, like so many others, was at first published anony- mously, and it appears to have been printed at Cambridge, at the University Press, in 1640, Each of the principal questions and answers was first given in full, and then was broken down into a number of subordinate questions, each of which required as answer only Yes or A^o. The Assembly thought such a method might be profitably used by the catechiser in catechising, but would not be persuaded formally to set down the subordinate questions in the printed catechism. Still the first part of his treatise may be regarded as the basis of their first and uncom- pleted draft of a catechism as recorded in the Minutes of the Assembly, p. 281, etc. But even in that draft, and still more decidedly in the later ones, the more important doctrinal defini- tions are based much more on Ussher's and Ball's catechisms than on Palmer's. THE EEY. DxiNIEL CAWDREY. Daniel Cawdrey was born about 1588-89, and was the son of an old Nonconformist minister. He was educated at th& College of Peterhouse, Cambridge, and took his degree in Arts before leaving the University. Some time before 1624 he had been appointed minister of Little Ilford in Essex, and soon afterwards he was transferred to the parish of Great Billing, in Northamptonshire. This he continued to hold till he wa& ejected in 1662, and he appears about 1648 to have been also minister of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, London. He died in October 1664, at Wellingborough. He was the author of several sermons preached on public occasions, and of treatises entitled Superstitio Superstes, Vindicice Clavium, Inconsistency of Independency with Scripture and ivith itself; and, as previously mentioned, he was joint author with Palmer of an important work on the Sabbath question. He was a member of the Assembly of Divines, who gave pretty regular attendance on its sittings, and took an active part in its debates and proceedings. liv BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. He was a member of the Committee on the Catechism, and had himself pubHshed a small catechism, as well as revised and edited a larger one drawn np by liis father. THE EEV. THOMAS GATAKER, B.D. Thomas Gataker was born in London in 15 74:. He was the son of the Rev. Thomas Gataker, of the family of Gatacre Hall, in Shropshire, in which the name had been continued from the days of Edward the Confessor. He entered St. John's College, Cambridge, in 1590, pursued his studies there Avith great ardour and success, and made special attainments both in Greek and Hebrew, He took his degrees in due course, and was elected Fellow of Sidney Sussex College in 1596. While there he was specially intimate with William Bedell, afterwards Bishop of Kilmore, and with him and some others " engaged in the pious and laudable work of preaching every Lord's Day in some of the surrounding villages." With Bedell, as well as with Ussher, he maintained correspondence in later life. On leaving the University he became chaplain to Sir William Cook, in London, and in IGOl he was appointed preacher to the Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn. This office he held for ten years, and, against the remonstrances of his friends, gave it up, when appointed to Rotherhithe or Redriff, in Surrey, near London Bridge. He discharged his duties in this important parish with the greatest diligence and acceptance. He held a lecture weekly on Fridays, as well as preached on the Lord's Day. In 1603 he was promoted to the degree of B.D., but afterwards, for economical reasons, he refused to proceed to the degree of D.D. In 1620 he made the tour of Holland and Belgium. " As the modesty of his nature withheld him from printing anything till he was forty-five j^ears of age, so by that time his judgment was so confirmed, and his learning supported by an almost incredible memory, that he constantly carried his point, and effectually baffled all the attempts to envelop again in darkness and obscurity any subject that he had once proposed to -enlighten." One of his earliest treatises was of the Nature and Use of LoU, which was highly esteemed and passed through several editions. In 1643 he was chosen a member of the REV. THOMAS GATAKER. Iv Assembly ut Divines, and at first he a^^pears to have given pretty regular attendance on their discussions. He took a })ro- minent part in the debates on Justification against Featley and others of the more narrowly orthodox school, and when a decided majority voted for their opinion, "his peaceable and pious spirit caused him to keej) silence, and to refrain from pub- lishing the treatise he had prepared on that subject grounded on Romans iii. 28.'' Baillie tells us he was flatly opposed to the Divine institution of the office of ruling elders. In 1644 he was offered the Mastership of Trinity College, Cambridge. But he declined that preferment, being content with his own pastoral charge, and more ambitious of doing good to others than of exalting himself Hallam says that, after Archbishop Ussher, Gataker was the most learned divine then in England. He would have been satisfied with a moderate Episcopacy, but liolding that bishops and presbyters, according to the New Testament, Avere the same, he ultimately submitted to Presby- tery. He wrote various learned treatises against the Anti- nomians, for which he received the thanks of the Assemblj'. His book, De Stylo Xori Tesfamenti, was one of the first to main- tain the view now universally accepted, that the Xew Testament is not written in classic Greek, but abounds in Hebraisms and Hellenisms. His edition of Marcus Antoninus was acknowledged to be one of the best, as it was one of the first, attempts to edit in a worthy form the works of the Stoic Emperor. A volume of his sermons was published in England, and a volume of his more learned works in Latin in Holland. His catechism, said to have been published in 1624, is very brief and simple, and does not seem to have been made use of in the composition of the Westminster Catechisms. His friend Simeon Ashe saj^s, in his funeral sermon on Gataker — " To his care of feeding his flock in public very agreeable was his diligence to instruct his family in private. For on Friday night weekly he did expound after supper that Short Catccldsme which he had published for the use of his parishioners, in which course he so laid forth the nature and attributes of God, the conditions of man entire and corrupt, the means of his fall and recovery, the nature of faith and repentance, with the doctrine of the sacraments, that his parlour was one of the best schools for a student of divinitv." Ivi BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. THE EEV. ANTONY TUCKNEY, D.D. Antony Tl'ckney was born in 1599, at Kirkton, in Lincolnshire, where his father was vicar. In 1613 he entered Emmanuel College, Cambridge, became B.A. 1617, M.A. in 1620, B.D. in 1627, and D.D. in 1649. He was for several years previous to 1627, fellow and tutor of his college, and under his watchful care many were trained up wdio afterwards did great service in Church and State, and retained a grateful remembrance of their obligations to him. About 1628 he is said to have composed a catechism to be used in Emmanuel College Chapel. Soon after he left the University, and became assistant to Mr. John Cotton at Boston. On the removal of Cotton to New England, in 1633, he was appointed to succeed him in the ministry, and continued faithfully to labour there till the civil war broke out. At the commencement of the Long Parliament he and Palmer were a2:)pointed to represent the clergy of Lincoln in Convocation; and in 1643, he, like Palmer, was nominated a member of the Assembly of Divines. In that year he removed with his family to London, and resided mostly there till 1648, when he took up his abode at Cambridge. While resident in London he acted as minister of the sequestrated charge of St. Michael's Quern. In 1645 he w^as made Master of Emmanuel College, Cambridge, and in 1653 he was transferred to the Mastership of St. John's, on the promotion of his friend Dr. Arrowsmith to that of Trinity. Shortly afterwards he succeeded to the Regius Professorship of Divinity, which Arrow- smith resigned. Tuckney took an active part in the business of the Assembly, and was a member of the Committees on Accom- modation " with the Independents," on the Confession of Faith, and on the Catechism. In the last of these, probably during the temporary absence of Palmer, he seems to have had chief charge for a time — first, while the exposition of the Ten Commandments was being digested into the shape in which we have it in the Larger Catechism, and again, during Palmer's last illness and after his death, when the Shorter Catechism was being finally revised. It is said by Brook and others that many of the answers in the Larger Catechism, and particularly in the part of I REV. ANTONY TCJCKNEY, D.D. Ivu it specified above, were prepared by him, and " were continued for the most part in the very words which he brought in." This, however, must, at any rate, be taken with the qualification that he availed himself largely of the materials already provided to his hand in the treatises of Cartwright, Perkins, Ussher, etc., and only endeavoured to improve on these. He continued in his offices at Cambridge till the restoration of Charles ii., "when a set of young men were so intoxicated with the return of the king, and flushed with warmer expectations as to forget the reverence and gratitude which was due to a venerable old man, and to turn upon the benefactor to whom most of them owed encouragement " in their studies, and several of them prefer- ment. He was prevailed on, by the king and the Earl of Man- chester, to resign his offices, and a pension of £100 a year out of their emoluments was promised to him. This was regularly paid by Dr. Gunning, who succeeded him both in his professor- ship and in the Mastership of St. John's. Tuckney died in 1669-70, "in a good old age and in good esteem," and was buried in St. Andre w's-under-Shaft, London. A volume of his sermons was published after his death ; also his lectures and theses in Latin, and other treatises. Whichcote held him and Arrowsmith in very high esteem, and the historian of St. John's College says of them that their government was so good, and the discipline under them so strict and regular, that learning then flourished, and several of those great men were then trained who were to be ornaments of the following age, as Stillingfleet, Beveridge, Cave, etc. Whichcote says of him, " I have had you all along in very high esteem, and have borne you reverence beyond what you do or can imagine, having in me a living and quick sense of my first relation to you ; and of all men alive I have least affected to differ from you or to call in question either what you have done, or said, or thought, but your judgment I have regarded with reverence and respect. I do not, I cannot, forget my first four years' education in the University under you, and I think I have principles by me I then received from you." THE REV. JOHN ARROWSMITH, D.D. John Arrowsmith was born at Gateshead, near Newcastle- on-Tyne, on 29bh March 1602 — i.e. the same year and day as Dr. e Iviii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. John Lightfoot. He was educated at St. John's College; became B.A. in 1619, B.D. in 1633, D.D. in 1647. He studied theology under the then Regius Professor — the celebrated Davenant — to whom in later life he acknowledged his great obligations, and whose moderate Calvinism he carefully followed. He was for some time fellow of Catherine Hall, and for several years after- wards he was minister of King's-Lynn, Norfolk. On being appointed a member of the Westminster Assembly he removed to London, where he obtained the sequestration of St. Martin's, Ironmonger Lane. He was highly esteemed by the divines of the Assembly, he took part in their debates on various occasions, and was a member of the Committees on the Confession of Faith and on the Catechisms. In 1644 he was, with the approval of the Assembly, appointed Master of St. John's College, Cambridge, and in 1651 Regius Professor of Divinity, and in 1653 was transferred from St. John's to Trinity. He died in 1689. Besides several sermons, two works of his are in print, viz., his Tactica Sacra and his Armilla Sacra or Chain of Principles^ both of which are highly esteemed, as he himself was for his learning, piety, and moderation in these troublous times. Baillie speaks of him as " ane learned divyne, on whom the Assembly putt the wryting against the Antinomians." Dr. Whichcote, who speaks so highly of Tuckney, says of Arrowsmith — " A later acquaintance indeed, but my friend of choice, as a companion of my special delight ; whom in my former years I have acquainted with all my heart, I have told him all my thoughts, and I have .scarcely either spoken or thought better of a man in respect of the sweetness of his spirit and amiableness of his conversation." THE REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Samuel Rutherfurd was born at Nisbet, now in the parish of Crailing, in Teviotdale, about the year 1600, and entered Edin- burgh University in 1617, where, four years later, he obtained his degree of M.A. Soon after he was chosen Regent of Humanity, but, on being charged Avith some irregularity, he demitted his office in 1625. Throucjh the influence of Gordon of Kenmure, he was settled as pastor of Anwoth, on the Sohvay Firth, in 1627, without complying with Prelacy, or "giving any REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Hx engagement to the Bishop." There, according to M'\Yard, his amanuensis, " he laboured night and day with great success, the whole country coming to him, and accounting themselves as his particular flock." Early in 1636, his first work, entitled Exerdtationes Aj^ologeticce j;?'0 D'lvina Gratia, emanated from the Amsterdam press. For this book, in defence of the doctrine of Grace against Arminianism, he had to stand a three days' trial before the High Commission. Having declined their jurisdic- tion, and refused to give the prelates their titles, he was deposed from his charge, prohibited to exercise his ministry within Scotland, and enjoined to ward himself in Aberdeen during the king's pleasure. In that stronghold of Episcopacy and Absolutism he remained ''six quarters of ane yeir" — spending his time in theological studies, and in writing many of those letters which have made him so famous. Thus, his enforced retirement became profitable to others as well as enjoyable to himself. His own words are — "I know, and am persuaded, it is for God's truth, and the honour of my King and royal Prince, Jesus, I now suffer ; and howbeit this town is my prison, yet Christ hath made it my palace, a garden of pleasures, a field and orchard of delight." " But," he exclaims, " my silence on the Lord's Day keeps me from being exalted above measure." " Nothing out of heaven, next to Christ, is dearer to me than my ministry," and " woe is me if I preach not the Gospel." He returned to Anwoth in the summer of 1638, soon after the National Covenant was renewed, and was a member of the famous Assembly held towards the close of that year in Glasgow. The city of Edinburgh applied to the Commission of Assembly to have him for one of their ministers, and at the same time St. Andrews University asked him as Professor of Divinity. Though more anxious far to remain in his obscure charge, with its scanty stipend, he was constrained, by the Assembly of 1639 confirming the proceedings of the Commission, to go to St. Andrews. But, at his urgent request, he was appointed to exercise his ministry in the city as well as to teach in the University, and he was inducted as a minister a few weeks after Mr. Eobert Blair. In his new sphere his hands were filled with work, but he lengthened his days by rising at three o'clock in the morning. Ix BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. According to his faithful amanuensis, " God did so singularly second His servant's indefatigable pains, both in teaching in the schools, and preaching in the congregation, that it became forth- with a Lebanon, out of which were taken cedars for building the house of the Lord through the whole land. ... He seemed to pray constantly, to preach constantly, to catechise constantly, to be still [i.e. continually] in visiting the sick, in exhorting from house to house, to teach as much in the schools, and spend as much time with the young men, as if he had been sequestered from all the world besides ; and withal to write as much as if he had been constantly shut up in his closet." Having been appointed one of the Scottish Commissioners to the Westminster Assembly, he took his seat among the divines on the 20th of November 1643, to "have a hand in laying the foundations for many generations, and building the waste places of Zion." " Had not God sent Mr. Henderson, Mr. Rutherfoord, and Mr. Gillespie among them," says Baillie, " I see not that ever they could have agreed to any settled government." Rutherfurd took a prominent part in the debates, and did good service also with his pen. While in London he published several of his controversial works, and preached before both Houses of Parliament. The Confession of Faith, the Directory for Worship, the Form of Church Government, and Larger Catechism having been drawn up, the General Assembly, on the 24th of August 1647, allowed him to return; but he did not take his leave of the Westminster Assembly until the 9th of November, when the Shorter Catechism had passed the first reading. On his return to St. Andrews he was made Principal of St. Mary's College, and twice or thrice held the office of Rector of the University. At this time there was preach- ing in the parish four times every week; and from 1649 till Rutherfurd's death, he and James Wood seem to have preached in the churches and presided in the Session as often as Blair and Honeyman, who, more strictly speaking, were the ministers of the parish. In 1642 he procured an act of transportability, and unsuccessful attempts were made to trans- late him to Edinburgh University, and to the parish of Calder. And so highly was he regarded in Holland that he was offered the Chair of Divinity and Hebrew in the University of Harder- REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Ixi wyck, and subsequently was elected successor to Dematius in the University of Utrecht, in 1651 ; but he thought too highly of the Church of Scotland to desert her in such troublous times. The last ten years of his life were perhaps the most trying. The Church he loved was rent by the unhappy controversy between the Eesolutioners and Protesters. Many of his old friends took the former side, while he felt it his duty to cleave to the latter. In 1660, Charles the Second was restored to the throne, and Presbytery, weakened by internal dissensions and betrayed by Sharp, was soon overthrown. Kutherfurd's Lex Rex, the prin- ciples of which are now acknowledged to underlie the British constitution, was burned at Edinburgh, London, and St. Andrews. Deprived of his chair in the University, and of his charge in the Church, he was confined to his house, and his stipend confiscated. Though evidently dying, he was cited to appear before Parliament on a charge of high treason. " But," Wodrow says, "he had a higher tribunal to appear before, where His Judge was his friend." In his illness he spoke much of the new name and the white stone given to God's children, and longed for a well-tuned harp to show forth Immanuel's praise. To four of his co-presbyters who came to see him, he said, " Dear brethren, do all for Him. Pray for Christ. Preach for Christ. Do all for Christ. Beware of men-pleasing." On the afternoon of the 28th of March 1661, he said, "This night will close the door, and fasten my anchor within the veil, and I shall go away in a sleep by five o'clock in the morning." The Celestial City seemed to dawn on his sight, as he rapturously exclaimed : " Glory, glory dwelleth in Immanuel's Land ! " In the words of Howie of Lochgoin, " By five o'clock in the morn- ing, as he himself foretold, it was said unto him, 'Come up hither ; ' . . . and the renowned eagle took its flight unto the mountains of spices." Rutherfurd, who was twice married, was survived by a widow and one daughter. No stone seems to have marked his resting- place in St. Andrews burying-ground, until 1735, when the Came- ronians laid a flat stone with a quaint inscription over his grave. About 1850 the inscription was renewed, and the stone repaired. It now stands on end, side by side with that which was then erected to the memory of Thomas Halyburton. In 1842, a Ixii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. monument sixty feet high was raised to his memory on the top of Boreland Hill, in the parish of An\Yoth. But he has left a monument, more enduring than either, in his Letters, which were written, not for publication, but out of the fulness of his heart, to his intimate friends. They have been translated into Dutch and German, and, having gone through more than thirty editions, are known everywhere, and, better still, are highly prized by very many exercised souls. Lit. — Life, by ^Murray : Edin., 12mo, 1828 ; and by Dr. Andrew Thomson, in 1884. His works are: — JExercitationes Ajyoloc/eticce 2)ro Divina Gratia: Amsterdam, 8vo, 1636; Franeker, 1651. A Peaceable and Temperate Plea for PauVs Presbyterie in Scoth.md : Lond., 4to, 1642. Sermon before the House of Com7)io?is .-Lond.y 4to, 1644. The Due Right of Presbyteries: 'Lo\\di.,'j^to, 1644. Lex Rex ; The Laiv and the Prince: Lond., 4to, 1644, 1657. Sermon before the House of Lords: Lond., 4to, 1645. The Tryal and Triumph of Faith: Lend., 1645, both in 4to and a smaller size; Lond., 1652 ; Edin., 1721 ; Glasg., 1743, 1827 ; and Edin., 1845. The Divine Right of Church-government and Excommunication ; to which is added A brief tractate of Scandcd : Lond., 4to, 1646. Christ dying and drawing Sinners to Himself e : Lond., 4to, 1647; Edin., 1727 ; Glasg., 8vo, 1803. A Survey of the Sjnrittial Anti- christ, in two parts : Lond., 4to, 1648. A Free Disputation against pretended Liberty of Conscience: Lond., 4to, 1649, 1651. The Last and ILeavenly Speeches and Glorioiis Departure of John, Vis- count Kenmuir : Edin., 4to, 1649; 12mo, 1703; 18mo, 1827. Disputatio Scholastica de Divina Providentia : Edin., 4to, 1650. Editions are also said to have been published in 1649 and 1651. The Covenant of Life Opened: Edin., 4to, 1655. A Survey of the Survey of that Summe of Church Discijyline 2^€nned by Mr. Thomas Hooker: Lond., 4to, 1658. Lnfiiiences of the Life of Grace : l^ondi., 4to, 1659. Joshua Redivivus, or Mr. Ruthe? ford's Letters, was first printed in 1664 ; Bonar's edition, with an appreciative sketch of his life, is by far the best : Edin., 8vo, 1863 ; 2 vols. Examen Arminianismi : Utrecht, 12mo, 1668. The Power and Prevalency of Faith and Prayer : 1713. A Testimony to the ivorh of Refor- REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. 1x111 mation, which he emitted a month before his death, was printed in 1739 and 1784. A Collection of Valuable Sermons, said to be from the notes of hearers, was printed in Glasgow in 1802, and, with additions, as Communion Sermons in 1876. A volume of Quaint Sermons was published in 1885. Ane Catechisme conteining the soume of Christian Religion, by Eutherfurd, is published for the first time in this Collection. ^ Eutherfurd was the " saint of the Covenant," ever striving to quicken in others the same enrapturing views as those which possessed his own soul, of Him whom he deemed '' chief among ten thousand thousands." But, as Mr. Taylor Innes has re- marked in his able and appreciative sketch of him, " It looks sometimes as if there were two men in him. One was the man whom all know in his letters — ardent, aspiring, and unworldly . . . rapt into the continual contemplation of one unseen Face ; finding his history in its changing aspect and his happiness in its returning smile. The other man was the intellectual gladia- tor, the rejoicing and remorseless logician, the divider of words, the distinguisher of thoughts, the hater of doubt and ambiguity, the scorner of compromise and concession, the incessant and determined disputant, the passionate admirer of sequence and system and order, in small things as in great, — in the corner of the corner of an argument, as in the mighty world outside with its orbits of the Church and of the State." '' The two men — the two halves of the man — were never made into one effective whole. To the very last the scholasticism and the devotion, however closely intermixed, are never fused together ; in Bacon's phrase, they are iron and clay — ' they cleave, but they do not incorporate. ' " Hence, perhaps, the unhappy quarrels of his earlier and later life in St. Andrews, not only with Sharp and Honey- man, who ultimately abandoned Presbyterianism, but also Mdth Howie, who returned to his earlier convictions in 1637, and whom Henderson saved from his harsh treatment, as Avith Blair and Wood, who were for years his colleagues, and proved as faithful to Presbytery in 1660 as himself. If we must credit him with having penetrated into Sharp's true character sooner 1 For the preceding part of this account of Eutherfurd, I am indebted to ray esteemed friend, D. Hay Fleming, Esq., St. Andrews. Ixiv BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. than his colleagues, we have yet to admit that Raitt, of Brechin, whom he would have taken into the College in place of Sharp, was only less unworthy of confidence, as he too changed with the times, and was made Principal of King's College, Aber- deen. His life in connection with the eventful times in which he lived has never yet been written with a full knowledge and investigation of sources still accessible, particularly the manu- script sources in the University, Kirk-Session, and Presbytery records of St. Andrews, though more than one interesting biography of him has recently been published. From the time of his settlement in Anwoth, Rutherfurd is said to have given special attention to catechising, both in his household and in his parish. The tradition as to Archbishop Ussher having visited him in disguise, and submitted to be catechised among the members of his household on the Saturday evening, if well founded, must be assigned to this period of his ministry. It may be that the first outlines of the catechism printed in the second part of this volume, were then drawn up, and that they may have been revised and expanded after his translation to St. Andrews in 1639, though it is most likely that they were not put into final shape till he went as a commissioner to the Westminster Assembly, and was engaged in suggesting materials for the catechisms of that Assembly. The account of the treatise given by one of his latest and most accomplished biographers is as follows : — " A sketch of a Sliorter Catechism exists in MS., in the Library of the Edinburgh University, in RutherfurcVs handtvriting, very much resembling the catechism as it now stands, from which it has been inferred that he had the principal hand in drawing it up for the Assembly." From the catechism, as here printed, it will be seen that the resemblance between Rutherfurd's draft and the Westminster Catechisms, either Shorter or Larger, is by no means so close as Dr. A. Bonar sup- posed either in plan or in language, and that, whatever help he may have given in details, the influence of Palmer, Tuckney, and Wallis is far more apparent than his. His catechism was meant to correspond, not to the Shorter, but to the Larger Catechism, as that of his friend Wyllie, which abridges his, was meant to correspond to the Shorter. Wyllie for a short time was his neighbour at Borgue, and seems to have kept up his friendship REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Ixv with him in after years. His catechism is a very pithy abridg- ment and revision of Rutherfurd's. Blair's catechism is a mere fragment, written on the back of a letter apparently sent him from England, and I shall not lengthen out these notices by giving a biographical notice of him, much as I honour him for his faithful carriage in St. Andrews through these troublous times. The handwriting of the MS. of these catechisms the late Mr. David Laing believed to be that of Eutherfurd. The style, language, and contents of the first catechism, even had the external evidence been less conclusive, would have gone far to warrant us in ascribing it to him to whom we owe the Letters, and many of the quaint Scotch words and metaphors used in the one are found in the other. Yet evidence is not altogether wanting that, like the AVestminster divines, he availed himself of pre-existing materials to some extent. Even the answer to the question, Qulio abuse the rest of Godis day .? (p. 232), which one would have been disposed to say was distinctively Ruther- furdian, is said to be found in approximate form in Bishop Andrews, and possibly may have come to him from a still older and quainter author. The particulars as to relative duties under the fifth commandment also closely resemble those given in some earlier Catechisms. In my Baiid Lectures (pp. 291, 292) I referred to a terse and brief st atement of Christian doctrine prepared by the Westminster divines, an d required by the English Parliament to be known by all who should l)e [admitted to partake of the Lord's Supper, I said that this statement was well worth the attention of those nowa-days who desire a simpler one than is contained in the Assembly's Confession or Catechisms, and I pro mised to reprint it in the Appendix of that volume. Having omitted to do this, I have inserted at the close of the first part of the present vol ume one of several catechisms (Austin's) which embody it and also break it down into the form of question and answer. APPENDIX A. I subjoin a few specimens of the manuscript sources still accessible for illustration of the history of Blair and Kutherfurd. 1. Excerpts from Records of Kirh- Session of St. Andrews. Tu. 8 Oct. [1639]. Mr. Andrew Auchinleck minister of Gods worde at Largo preached, being appoynted therunto be the presbyterie Wednes- day last for receiving of our Minister Mr. Robert Blair this day to the function of the Ministerie in this kirk and congregation quhilk after sermone was performit, he sitting at ane table befoir the pulpit accord- ing to the custome with the Magistrates, and specialls of this citie, the Maisteris of the colledges and principall gentlemen of the landwart, who all in signe of their willing acceptation and receiving him to the said function as representing the whole congregation, took him by the hand after some positions put furth to him by the said Mr. Andrew, namelie his willingness to accept and undergo the said charge, his faithfulnes, sinceritie and diligence thairin and uther poynts needful! y^anent, cf unto he willinglie granted, declareing his willing mynd with upholding hands before God and the congregation present. The whole people lykwyiss being posed on thair dutie and obedience to his doctrine and discipline in willing manner with great applause yieldit ymnto with congratulations for God's mercie in his calling hither, qlk being done, followed the prayer, thanksgiving, and the blessing. Tuesday 19 Nov^'. [1639]. . . Heirafter Mr. Samuell Rutherfurde being callit heir from the west countrie be the last General Assemblie holden at Ed^^^' for being ane of the maisteris of the new Colledge to teach divinitie and lykwyiss coadjutor to the said Mr. Robert Blair in the function and charge of the Ministerie heir, was receivit heir this day be the congregation in maner abone written. Novi". 24 [1642]. Mr. Andro Honeyman . . be ghall consent was admitted ane of the ministers of this city and received to the said func- tion this day. May 21 [1646]. No session, our minister Mr. James Wood being admittit, and the Presbytery being conveened in the session house. Sepi". 28 [1654]. No session this day, the ministers being some seeke and some at the provinciall. 1656 (p. 165). Ministers in this city at this time : Mr. Robert Blair, Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird, Mr. James Wood, and Mr. Andro Honyman. Ocf. 2 [1645]. Sonday next the late Directorie for worship in the kirk, concludit be the Devynes of Ingland, allowit be the Parliament there, and be our owne and General Assembly in Scotland to be used heirafter — Intimate and publicly red the whole heids and contents y'of this day. [1650]. Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird, Principall of the New College, and APPENDIX A. Ixvii ane of the ministers of this city, desired that he might have ane com- modious seat for his wife in the kirk for convenient hearing of the Lord's word, qlk desire was thought reasonable, etc. 2. Excerpts from Becords of Presbytery . Sep. 14 [1642]. The qlk day y^ came a letter from Mr. Andro Hony- man shewing yt he was informed Mr. Samuell Eutherfuird was of purpose to make use of his act of transportabilitie that he [had] and had been asking libertie of ye session of St. Andrews so to doe, and yrfor wold be no meanes keepe y*^ day appointed for his admission at St. Andros, and y^'for desired y^ delay yrof for a time till ye mater be further cleared qlk was granted. . . . October 26. The Presbytery being informed of Mr. Samuell Eutherfuird his purpose to make use of y* act of transportabilitie granted to him by ye late General Assemblie and yt a presentation to y^ kirk of Calder is purchased for him which is to be befor ye Synod of Lothiane to be holden at Linlithgow on tuesday nixt, The Presbyterie have appointed y^ brother Mr, Andro to repaire thither against y^ tyme and declare to ye forsaid Synod ye great prejudice ye Kirk of Scotland may receive by his transportation, and to desire j^ earnestlie to joyne with us for retaineing ye said Mr. Samuell in his present charge at St. Andros. Nov^. 9. Compeired Mr. W'". Dalgleish minister at Cramont with Mr. Andro Honyman shewing ye concurrence of ye Provinciall of Lothiane at our desire for reteining jSlr. Samuell Eutherfuird in his present charge Ci^upon both Presbyterie, L^niversitie, and towne did heartilie thank y"^ for yr care and diligence, and embraced ye said Mr. Samuell to abyde heir, qrunto he did aggrie. May 3 [1643]. All ye members within ye Universitie, INIasters and Students are appointed to subscryve ye Covenant againe and Mr. Samuel Eutherfuird Eector is appointed befor ye subscription y^of to have some explication of q*^ points in it may be difficile to those of younger years and meaner capacities. Dec^'. 28. The Presbyterie received a letter from ye Comission of ye Assemblie desiring y™ to send out such ministers to ye armie as ye Comittee of estates and ye Colonell of ye Eegiment sail desire and name. As also they received a letter from ye Comittee of estates desireing yt for ye good of ye publick they wold appoint Mr. Eobert Blair Minister of St. Andros to goe out with ye armie and attend the Erie of Lindsay his regiment. The towne of St. Andros desired ye Presbyterie to take to consideration ye greatnes of y*^ charge, and so how hardlie he can be spared especiallie Mr. Samuell Eutherfuird one of y'' pastors being alreadie employed abroad for ye publicke as also ye abounding of witches daylie discovered among y^, whose tryall will likely be much interrupted if he sail be removed. The said Mr. Eobert himself did likewayes declare yt he lies frequent habituall infirmities lying upon his bodie, all which and diverse other reasons being considdered ye Presbyterie declarit yt they could not at this tyme enjoyne him to undergoe y* charge, and a letter to be writen to ve Lord Chancellor signifieing so much. Ixviii APPENDIX A. Blair, however, was ultimately constrained to go, and remained for some months with the Scottish army in the North of England. The session-book records his return, under date July 18th 1644, immediately after the victory at Marston Moor, for which the following Lord's day was appointed as a day of thanksgiving. Septr. 28tli [1642]. Rutherfuird. Octr. 12th [1642]. St.Andros and Rutheifixird. Octr. 26th St. Aiidros. Excerpts regarding Rutherfurd's Stipend. It was regrated by diverse brethren y^ as they were in- formed all ye time Mr. Samuell Kutherfurd hes beene Minister of St. Andrews he hes never received anything for mainteinance of y^ Landward paroch yof. Some of y^ gentlemen qo were present desired y® mater to be tryed by ye Presbyterie who is to blame. The Presbyterie did appoint Mr. David Monro, Mr. Arthur Myrton, Mr. James Wood, Scottiscraig and Kembok to try ye mater, and y^ a letter be writen from ye Presbyterie to such as are most unwilling to meitt with yt" and shew y^ reasons. I Those qo were appointed to meitt with y« heritors and 1 others of ye Landward Parochin of St. Andrews, and to deale , with ym concerning y® refounding to Mr. Samuell Rutherfurd I of yt part of his stipend which yet rests un payed according I to condition Declared they did meitt but none of those mett with yn\ They appointed yet to write to y"^ to meitt with I ym at St. Andros on tuesday next for yt effect. Those appointed to meitt with ye heritors in ye Landward Paroch of St. Andros declared they had appointed Erlshall yonger and Lathones, Kinkell and Kynnaldie to use diligence y^in. Because Erlshall resyles in bearing burden or doing any- thing in yt bussines of repaying ye rest of Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird's promised mainteinance y^ sould be payed by I ye Landward Paroch of St. Andrews, Kinkell and Kynnadie I undertakes to doe y* part also. I Kynnadie being present, and ye Pb"e desiring to know 1 qt diligence he with ye rest have used in collecting y"^ which ' is due to Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird from ye Landward Paroch of St. Andros, shew y* they were well advanced in laying downe a course for ye same, bot nothing collected except 42lb. 15s. which Kynnadie hes qrof he desires to be dis- burdened, which ye Presbyterie appoints ye clerk to receive i and be comptable for ye same to ye said Mr. Samuell. June 20th 1649.! The Presbyterie does nominate and appoint ye right Connnjssioneis reverend Mr. Robert Blair and Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird i Ministers of St. Andros, and Mr. Henrie Rymer Minister of Carnbie, and ye right honorable The Laird of Scottiscraig yr lawfull Commissioners to ye ensewing Generall Assemblie ' to be holden at Ed'" ye first Wedinsday of July next. Novr. 9th [1642]. ErLshall resyles. July 17 [1644]. Rutherfuird. to ye Generall As.slie APPENDIX B. I can find room for only one specimen of the close connection that may be traced between the Larger Catechism and the earlier manuals. I take that afforded by the general rules for the exposition of the com- mands. I subjoin these in the form and order in which they are first set down in the Minutes of the Assembly, as bringing out most fully their correspondences with the rules in earlier manuals, and especially that attributed to Ussher. [2] That it is spiritual, and so reacheth the understandhig, -will, affections, and all other powers of the soul ; as well as words, works, and gestures. 1, That the law is perfect, and so bindeth every one to full conformity in the whole man unto the righteousness thereof, and unto sincere entire obedience for ever ; [so as to requii-e the highe st pitc h of every duty, and to forbid the least degree of every sin.] 3. That [as] where a duty is commanded the contrary sin is forbidden, and where a sin is forbidden the contrary duty is commanded : [so where a j^romise is annexed, the contrary threatening is included ; and where a threatening is annexed, the contrary promise is included. [This was ultimately made No. 4, and the following inserted as 3 : That one and the same thing in divers respects is commanded or forbidden in several commandments.] 5. That what God forbids is at no time to be done ; what He commands is always our duty ; but not to be done at all times [and yet every particular duty not to be done at all times]. , 6. That under one sin or duty all of the same kind are forbidden or com- manded, together with all the causes, means, occasions, and appearances thereof, and provocations thereunto . 7. That what is forbidden or commanded to ourselves, we are bound, accord- ing to our places, to endeavour that it may be avoided or performed by others. Ixx APPENDIX B. 8. Tliat [in] wliat is commanded to others, we are bound, according to our places, to be belpfnl to them ; and to take heed of partaking with others in what is forbidden to them. Perkins's. The true interpretation of the Deca- logue must be according to these rules : I. In the negative the affirmative must be understood : and in the affirma- tive the negative. II. The negative bindeth at all times and to all times : and the affirmative bindeth at all times, but not to all times : and therefore negatives are of more force. Attersoll's Catechism . Q. How is the laAv to be expounded ? — A. According to the interpretation of the Scripture, which may be ex- pressed in these rules : — 1. Where anything is forbidden, the contrary is commanded ; and where anything is commanded, the contrary is forbidden. 2. Where any vice is forbidden, all of the same kind and nature are forbid- den, and contrariwise. III. Under one vice expressly for- bidden, are comprehended all of that kind ; yea the least cause, occasion, or enticement thereto is forbidden. Evil thoughts are condemned as well as evil actions. IV. The smallest sins are entitled with the same names that that sin is which is expressly forbidden in that commandment to which they appertain, as . . . hatred is named murder, and to look after a woman with a lusting eye is adultery. V. We must understand every com- mandment of the law, so as that we annex this condition — unless God com- mand the contrary. For God being an absolute Lord, and so above the law, may command that which His law for- biddeth : so He commanded Isaac to be offered, the Egyptians to be spoiled, the brazen serpent to be erected, which was a figure of Christ, etc. 3. The Law is spiritual, and reacheth the heart. 4. All occasions, allurements, and enticements to sin are forbidden ; and, where any virtue is commanded, the means to further it are required. 5. All signs, tokens, and marks are forbidden, whereby sins may be known and manifested. 6. We are bound to further the obser- vation of the commandments in others as well as in ourselves ; otherwise we do make ourselves j)artakers of other men's sins. APPENDIX B, Ixxi Ussher's Body of Divinity. I. That the law is spiritual, reaching to the [understanding, will, and affec- tions afterwards named] soul and all the powers thereof ; and charging as well the hearts and thoughts as the outward man. II. That the laAv is perfect, not only binding the soul, but also the whole soul, to discharge all the several func- tions of her faculties perfectly. ... So, in condemning evil, it condemneth all evil ; and in ccmnianding good, it com- mandeth all good, charging man to prac- tise the good and refuse the evil per- fectly. III. That in every commandment there is a borrowed speech, whereby more is commanded and forbidden than is named. 1. Whatsoever the law eommandeth, it forbiddeth the contrary ; and Avhat- soever it forbiddeth, it eommandeth the contrary. So where any duty is en- joined, as in the affirmative command- ments, there we must understand tlie contrary sin to be forbidden : and where any sin is forbidden, as in the negative, there must we know the contrary duty is required. 2. Whatsoever the law eommandeth or forbiddeth in one kind, it eom- mandeth or forbiddeth all of the same kind, and all the degrees thereof, etc. 3. Whatsoever the law eommandeth or forbiddeth, it eommandeth or for- biddeth the causes thereof, and all the j means whereby that thing is done or ] brought to pass. So that with the I thing forbidden, or the duty enjoined, ; all occasions, or provocations, or fur- I therances thereto, are conseqiiently con- demned or reiiuired. Ball's Larger Catechism. 1. That the law is spiritual, binding the soul and conscience to entire obedi- 2. The meaning of the precepts is to be drawn from the main scope and end thereof. [Under No. 5 below is the following : Q. Is one and the same thing com- manded in divers precepts? — A. In divers, yea, in all the commandments one and the same duty may in diverse respects be commanded, and the same sin may be forbidden.] 3. The commandment which forl)id- deth a sin eommandeth the contrary duty ; and the commandment Avhich requireth a duty forbiddeth the con- trary sin. 4. Under one vice expressly forbid- den, all of the same kind, and that necessarily depend thereon, as also the least cause, occasion, or enticement thereto, are likewise forbidden. 5. Under one duty expressed, all of the like nature are comprehended, as all means, effects, and whatsoever is necessarily required for the perform- ance of that duty. 6. Where the more honourable person is expressed, as the man, let the woman understand that the precept concerneth her. 7. Where the duty of one man stand- ing in relation to another is taught, there is taught the duty of all standing in the like relation one unto another. APPENDIX C. EDITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY. Extracted {hut n'ith additions inserted) from Dr Schaff's " Creeds of Christendom,^^ vol. i. pp. 783, 784.] The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of j Divines, | now by authority of Parliament | sitting at Westminster ; | concerning | a larger catechism : | presented by them lately to both Houses | of Parliament. | Printed at London, 4to, Oct. 1647 — 8vo, also 1647. Reprinted at Edin- burgh, same year, 4to, by Evan Tyler, printer to the King's most excel- lent Majestic. These editions are all without proofs. The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of | Divines, | now by authority of Parliament \ sitting at Westminster, | concerning | A larger Catechism ; \ presented by them lately to both Houses i of Parliament. | With the proofs thereof out of the Scriptures. \ 4", London, 1648. The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of | Divines, | now by authority of Parliament | sitting at Westminster ; | concerning | a Shorter Catechism : | presented by them lately to both Houses | of Parliament. | Printed at London, 4to, Nov. 1647. 8vo, 1647. Rei)rinted at Edinburgh, 4", same year. These editions are all without proofs. The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of | Divines, [ now by :\,\\t\\or'ity oi Parliament \ sitting at Westminster, | concerning | A Shorter Catechism ; | presented by them lately to both Houses | of Parliament. | With the proofs thereof out of the Scriptures. 4", London 1648. Other early London editions bear date 1648, 1650, 1654, 1660, 1680, 1688. The Shorter Catechism was also repeatedly printed at London under the following title : — The Grounds and Principles of Beligion, contained in A Shorter Catechism : (according to the advice of the Assembly of Divines sitting at Westminster). To be used throughout the kingdom of England and Dominion of Wales. There was also published in Timo, London 1670, an Abridgment of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism, fitted for the use of the weakest cai)acities and memories. These Catechisms have been translated into many languages, especially the Shorter. A Latin version of both appeared, together with the Latin version of the Confession, at Cambridge in 1656, was reprinted there in 1659, and several times subsequently, at Edinburgh and Glasgow. A EXPOSITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS. Ixxiii Greek version of the Shorter Catechism, along with the Latin, by John Harmer, Regius Professor of Greek in Oxford, was published at London in 1660. A Hebrew version, by William Seaman, M.D., was published at London in 1689. It was also translated into German, Dutch, and Turkish. In our own day it has been translated by Dr. Robert Young into Hebrew, Syriac, Samaritan, Greek, Latin, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, Dutch, and Gaelic, and into Hebrew and Syriac by Rev. H. S. M'Kee. The American missionaries at Beyrout have translated it into Arabic, and the late Rev. William Charteris of Smyrna translated it into modern Greek. The Catechisms are generally printed in editions of the Confession of Faith, and the separate editions of them during the past two centuries in Britain and America are almost innumerable. EXPOSITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS. {Also from ^' Creeds of Christendom,''^ with additions.) John Wallis, D.D., Professor at Oxford (b. 1616, d. 1703) : A brief and easie explanation of the Shorter Catechism, presented by the Assembly of Divines at Westminster to both Houses of Parliament, and by them approved. Wherein the meanest capacities may in a speedy and easie way be brought to understand the Principles of Religion. In imitation of the Catechism, formerly published by Mr. Herbert Palmer, B.D., and late Master of Queen's CoUedge. London, 1657. 10th edition, Dublin, 1702. Joseph Alleine {b.l633, d. 1668) : A most familiar explanation of the Assemblies Shorter Catechism, London. Thomas Lye (Minister in London, d. 1684): An explanation of the Shorter Catechism. London, 1676. Hugh Binning (d. 1653, Professor of Moral Philosophy, Glasgow) : The common principles of the Christian religion. . . . A practical cate- chism, 1671. Thomas Vincent (Minister in London, d. 1671) : An explanation of the Assemhbfs Shorter Catechism. London, 1708 ; Edinburgh, 1799 ; Presbyterian Board of Publication, Philadelphia. Thomas Watson (Minister in London, d. 1690): A hocly of practical divinity, consisting of above 176 sermons on the Shorter Catechism. 5th 1 edition, Glasgow, 1797 ; London, 1807 ; Glasgow, 1838 ; New York, 1836. John Flavel (b. 1627, d. 1691) : Exposition of the Catechism, 1692. , In his Whole Works, 2 vols, fol., 1701, 7th edition, Edinburgh, 1762 ; and j in 6 vols., London, 1820. I Thomas Doolittle (d. 1707): A complete Body of Divinity . London, 1723. 1 Thomas Ridgley (b. 1667, d. 1734): A Body of Divinity. . . . Being i the substance of Lectures on the Assembly's Larger Catechism. London, I / Ixxiv EXPOSITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS. 1731-33, 2 vols. fol. ; an edition in 4 vols. 8vo, 1814 ; Edinburgh, 1845, 2 vols. 8vo, New York, 1855. Samuel Willard (b. 1640, d. 1707) : A Body of Divinity in 250 lectures on the Assembly's Catechism. 1 vol. fol., Boston, 1726. Thomas Boston (Minister of Ettrick, b. 1676, d. 1732) : Illustration of the Doctrines of the Christian Religion upon the plan of the Shorter Catechism. John Willison (Minister of Dundee from 1718 to 1750) : An example of plain catechising upon the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. Edinburgh, 1737; 2d edition, Glasgow, 1764. Fisher's Catechism : The Westminster Assembly's Shorter Catechism explained, by way of- question and answer. By some Ministers of the Oosjoel. The authors are Ealpli Erskine ((i. 1752) ; Ebenezer Erskine (d. 1754) ; and James Fisher (d. Sept. 28, 1775, Secession Minister at Greyfriars, Glasgow). Fisher prepared the second part alone, and issued the third edition, Glasgow, 1753. Hence the whole work is called by his name. 14th edition, Edinburgh, 1800 ; 17tli edition, Glasgow, 1813 ; also by the Board of Publication, Philadelphia. James Fisher : The Shorter Catechism in verse. John Brown (Minister at Haddington from 1751 to 1787) : Easy explicatioji of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. 8tli edition, Edinburgh, 1812 ; 9th edition, Montrose, 1822. James Gall : Key to the Shorter Catechism. Edinburgh. Henry Belfrage, (d. 1835) : A practical exposition of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism, exhibiting a system of theology in a popular form. Edinburgh, 2d edition, 1834, 2 vols. Alex. Mair (d. 1751) : A brief explication of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. New edition, Montrose, 1837. Alex. Smith Paterson : A concise system of theology : being the Shorter Catechism analysed and explained. Edinburgh, 1841 ; 2d edition, 1844. Eliza Smith : Chaptei's on the Shorter Catechism. Edinburgh. Ashbel Green, D.D. (President of Princeton College from 1812 to 1822 ; d. 1848) : Lectures on the Shorter Catechism. Philadelphia, 1841, 2 vols., Presbyterian Board of Publication. Jonathan Cross : Illustrations of the Shorter Catechism. Proof-texts, exposition, and anecdotes. 2 vols. 18mo. Presbyterian Board of Publica- tion. Edwin Hall, D.D. : The Shorter Catechism of the Westminster Assembly, with Analysis and Scripture proofs. Presbyterian Board of Publication, James R. Boyd, D.D. : The Westminster Shorter Catechism ; with analysis, proofs, explanations, and illustrative anecdotes. 18mo. Pres- byterian Board of Publication. The Belief onte series of Tracts on the answers to the Shorter Catechism, written by numerous Presbyterian ministers, and edited by the Rev. Wm. T. Wylie, Belief onte. Pa., 1875. The Shorter Catechism,, by Rev. Alex. Whyte, D.D., Free St. George's Church, Edinburgh, being one of Clark's series of Bible Handbooks. I LIST OF CATECHISMS. IxxV LIST OF CATECHISMS EXAMINED BY ME IX VARIOUS LIBRARIES. IN LIBRARY OF BRITISH MUSEUM. A short Catechism, containing the principles of religion, very profitable for all sorts of people — the Four-and-thirtieth Impression. London, 1653 (Ball's Smaller Catechism). A short Treatise containing all the principal grounds of Christian religion, ver}^ profitable for all men, especially for all householders, by way of questions and answers, etc. — the Seventh ImjJression. London, 1629 (Ball's Larger Catechism). Exposition not broken up into questions. Same Treatise — Tenth Imjyression. London, 1635. Exposition still without subordinate questions. Same Treatise — Thirteenth Impression. London, 1650. After the original title follow the words : "Whereunto were added several questions by the Rev. author's own pen to clear the exposition, as you may perceive by the epistle to the reader." This epistle, by his friend Ashe, further informs us that "the questions which the Rev. author with his own pen put into the margin of the Book, to clear the exposition for the benefit of some private friends, are now, upon the request of many, both ministers and others (who have experienced the profit hereof), published for more common use. The Catechism as now printed remains the self- same for substance, without addition or diminution, and there is no more chauge in the phrase of words than necessity compelled, that there might be an harmonious suitableness betwixt the questions and answers." Mr. Thomas Langley is mentioned as being one of them " who concurred at least with the worthy author in the first publishing of this Catechism." Same Treatise — Fourteenth Impression. London, 1670. An abridgment and modification of Ball's Shorter Catechism appears to have been published in 1659, a copy of which is to be found in E. 1845. A Briefe Catecheticall Exposition of Christian Doctrine, divided into foure Catechismes, Comprizing the doctrine of the I. Two Sacraments, II. Lord's Prayer, III. Ten Commandments, IV. and theCreed. London, 1633. A later edition [A Short Catechisme for the Simpler Sort, by Thos. Gattaker, B.D. London, 1624. Press-mark, 4474 bb. 33), has the name of Dr. Twisse. An endeavour of making the principles of Christian Religion, viz., The Creed, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the Sacra- ments, plain and easie, etc. etc., printed by Roger Daniel, printer to the University of Cambridge, 1640. This is the first edition of Palmer's Catechism, but does not bear the author's name. The copy in the British Museum purports to have been gifted by Sir Peter Wentworth to Elizabeth Hancocke. Ixxvi LIST OF CATECHISMS. The Humble Advice of the Assembly of Divines now by authority of Parliament sitting at Westminster, concerning — I. A Confession of Faith, II. A Larger Catechism, III. A Shorter Catechism, presented by them lately to both Houses of Parliament. Printed at London, and re- printed at Edinbrough, mdcxlviii. E. 417. The Grounds and Principles of Religion, contained in a Shorter Catechism (according to the advice of the Assembly of Divines sitting at Westminster), to be used throughout the Kingdom of England and Dominion of Wales. London. Printed in the year 1678, -^-O^ C. Another edition with same title bears date 1705, another 1707. A Christian Exercise, containing an easie entrance into the principles of Peligion, and the chiefest points of our Salvation in Christ, with a direction for all Christians unto the service of God, by W. Home. London. The Demands of Holy Scripture, with answeres to the same, etc., made by T. Becon. London, 1517. The Catechisme, etc., newly translated out of Latin and Dutch (Heidelberg Catechism). London, 1578. A Catechisme and plain instruction for children which prepare them- selves to communicate in the Holy Supper, yielding therein openly a reason of their faith according to the order of the French Church at London. Written in French by Monsieur Fountaine, minister of the same church there, and lately translated into English by T. W. London^ 1579. It has at the end an "Advertisement we are accustomed to give the Saturday going before the Supper at the prayers, to the end that every one may prepare himself as he ought to the worthy communicating and partaking thereof." The Foundation of Christian Religion, gathered into six Principles. And it is to be learned of ignorant people that they may be fit to heare sermons with profit, and receive the Lord's Supper with comfort. Psalm 119. 30. London, 1595. One of the earliest editions of Perkins' Cate- chism, whose name is signed at end of Preface. The Good Old Way, or Perkins' improved, in a plain exposition and sound application of those depths of divinity briefly comprised in his six principles by that late painfull and faithfull minister of the gospel, Charles Broxolme in Darbyshire. London, 1653. A Learned and Excellent Treatise containing all the principal grounds of Christian Religion, set down by way of conference in a most plain and familiar manner. Written first in French by Master Mathew Virell, after translated into Latin, and now turned into English for the use of our countrymen. The second impression, corrected and amended. London, 1594. The Principles or the Patterne of Wholesome Words, containing a collection of such truths as are of necessity to be believed unto salvation, separated out of the body of all theologie made evident by infallible and plaine proofes of Scriptures, and withall the several uses such principles should be put to are abundantly showed. A project much desired, and LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxvii of singular use for all sorts of Christians, by N. Byfield, Preacher of God's Word at Isleworth in Middlesex. The fifth edition, corrected and amended. London, 1634. Sixth edition, 1637. The Summe of the Principles, or A Collection of those Principles of Religion which are set down in the little treatise called the Principles or Patterne of wholesome words, where they are at large explained, proved, and applied. London, 1634. This is generally printed with the other. Its introductory address to the Christian reader is signed Adoniram Byjidd. The treatise consists of twenty-three sections : 1, of the Scriptures ; 2, of God ; 3, of Creation ; 4, of Providence ; 5, of Man in the state of innocency ; 6, of Man in the state of corruption, and of his fall ; 7, of Sinne ; 8, of the Punishment of Sinne ; 9, of Man in the state of grace and election ; 10, of Redemption in Christ and of His person ; 11, of the Human IS'ature of Christ ; 12, of Christ the Mediator; 13, of the Prophetical Office of Christ ; 14, of His Priestly Office, and of His obedience to the law; 15, of the Expiation of Sinne; 16, of the Intercession of Christ; 17, of the Kingly Office of Christ; 18, of the Church ; 19, of Justification ; 20, of Sanctitication ; 21, of Man in his Estate of Glory and of his resurrection ; 22, of the Last Judgment ; 23, of the glory of Heaven. In plan it resembles first part of Catechism. The Plaine Man's Pathway to Heaven, wherein every man may clearly see whether he shall be saved or damned, set forth dialoguewise for the better understanding of the simi)le, by Arth. Dent, Preacher of the Word of God at South Shooberry, Essex. The eighteenth impression, corrected and amended, with a table of all the principal matters, and three prayers necessary to be used in private families. London, 1622. A Pastime for Parents, or a Recreation to pass away the time, con- taining the most principall grounds of Christian Religion, by Arthur Dent, Preacher of the word of God at South Shooberry in Essex. London, 1609. 1. The Principles of Christian Religion summarily set down according to the Word of God together with a brief epittomie of the bodie of divinitie, by James Ussher, Bishop of Armagh. Jjondon, 1645. 2. A Briefe Methode of Christian Religion with more particular de- claration of some particular heads of doctrine which for more plainnesse sake were shortly touched in the former Summe, bj' James Ussher, Bishop of Armagh. London, 1646. A Patterne of -Catechisticall Doctrine wherein many profitable ques- tions touching Christian Religion are handled, and the whole Decalogue succinctly and judiciously expounded, with additions. London, 1641. Generally attributed to Bishop Andrewes, but an old hand in manuscript in the British Museum copy attributes it to Ussher. E. 1185. The Two Covenants from Sinai and Sion drawn up catecheti- cally and plainly. Together with a brief appendix directed about the use of the New Covenant in a practical way. Published for the benefit especially of the inhabitants of Easthara by Samuel Slater. London, 1644. The other catechisms in the volume are given on p. Ixxxi. Ixxviii LIST OF CATECHISMS. A Practical Catechism, of purpose framed for the help of such as desire to enjoy more sweet and intimate soul commumion with Christ in that sacred ordinance of his own Supper, by Samuel Austin, an unworthy minister of Jesus Christ. London, 1647. A Short Catechisme, being a brief instruction of the ignorant before the receiving of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper by Mr. Obadiah Sedgwick. London. The Grounds of Divinitie plainly discovering the mysteries of Christian Religion, propounded in questions and answers substantially proved by Scriptures expounded faithfully according to the writings of the best Divines, and evidently applied by profitable uses, corrected and enlarged by Elnathan Parr, Minister of the Word. Eighth edition. London, 1636. A Briefe Methode of Catechising wherein are handled those foure points, etc. The same points are also contracted, and a form of examining communicants added. The sixteenth edition penned and amended by the author. London, 1610. A Book of Christian Questions and Answeres, wherein are set forth the chiefe points of Christian Religion, a worke right necessarie and profitable for all such as shall have to deale with the captious quarrel- lings of the wrangling adversaries of God's trueth. London, anno 1581. Appended to the Catechism is the "Ladder to Thrifte," some steps of which are : — 1. To take thy calling thankfullj?- and shunne the path to beggery. 2. To grudge in youth no drudgerie to come by knowledge perfectly. 28. To bear thy crosses patiently for worldly things are slippery. 31. To pray to God continually to aid thee 'gainst thine enemie. 32. To spend the Sabbath holily and help the poore in miserie, etc. These be the steppes unfeinedly to climbe to thrifte by husbandrie. A Briefe Catechisme so necessary and easie to be learned even by the simple sort that whosoever cannot or wall not attaine to the same is no!^ to be accounted a good Christian, much lesse to be admitted to the Supper of the Lorde. London, 1582. Briefe Principles of Religion for the exercise of youth, done by Christopher Watson. London, 1581. A Little Catechism, that is to say, a short instruction touching Christian Religion, set forth by Theodoras Beza, Minister of the Church of God at Geneva. It is said at the end to have been imprinted at London by Hugh Singleton, dwelling at Creed Lane, at the Sign of Gylden Tunn nere unto Ludgate cum privileglo Anno 1578. Another edition in 1579. A Preparation unto the waie of lyfe with a direction unto the right use of the Lorde's Supper, gathered by William Hopkinson, Preacher of the Word of God. Imprinted at London, 1583. A Catechisme with a prayer annexed meete for all Christian families. Imprinted at London by Ch. B. for H; S. A Catechisme containing the summe of Christian Religion, giving a LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxix most excellent light to all those that seek the pathway to salvation. Newlie set forth by G. G. (George Gyffard), Preacher of God's Word at Maiden, Essex. London, 1583. A Short Catechisme for Householders with prayers to the same adjoyning. Hereunto are added under the answer unto every question the proofs of the Scripture for every point of said Catechisme, gathered by John Stockwood, Schoolmaster of Tunbridge. London, 1583. Short Questions and Answeares, etc., Dawson. London, 1584. Its first question and answer are " Wherefore hath God made, sanctified, and preserved you? A. To seek his glory, Romans xi. 30." Certain Short Questions and Answeres, very profitable and necessary for all young children, and such as are desirous to be instructed in the principles of the Christian Faithe. Imprinted at London, 1584. An Abridgment of the former treatise for the help of such as are desirous "to learn by heart the chief principles of Christian Religion." Certaine Necessarie Instructions meet to be taught the yonger sort before they come to be partakers of the Holy Communion. To this is appended Certaine Articles very necessarie to be knowen of all yong schoUers of Christe's School. The first is, " that the end of our creation is to glorify God." The Ground of Christianity, composed in a dialogue between Paul and Titus, containing all the principall poyntes of our Salvation in Christ. London, 1584. The first question and answer are, " What is the chief est duety of a Christian man in this life? The chiefest duety of man, and not of man onely, but of all the creatures in the world in their nature, is to set forth the glory of God." A Short Summe of the whole Catechism, wherein the question is pro- pounded and answered in few words for the greater ease of the common people and children. London, Waldegrave, 1584. (Second Edition of Craig's Catechism. The first was printed in 1581.) A Brief and Short Catechism, necessary for all them that would be Christians indeed to be able to understand and answer to. The preface to the reader is signed by Thomas Sparks. To the question, " To what end hath he made man ? " the answer is returned, '* To the setting forth of his own glorie, and that man should serve him." A Short and Fruitfull Treatise of the benefit and necessitie of cate- chising, that is, of instructing the youth and ignorant persons in the principles and grounds of Christian Religion. Hereunto is added, at the latter end of the preface, a brief method of catechising, etc., gathered, corrected, and now once again augmented by R. C. (Cawdrey). London, 1604. The following is appended : — " Seven Observations which every Christian ought to labour to have the reverent preparation of themselves to the reading and hearing of in the Word of God, by R. C. 1. Wisdome to understand it, James i. 5 ; 1 Kings iii. 9 ; 2 Chron. i. 10. 2. Diligence to continue, 2 Tim. iii. 14; 1 Tim. iv. 16; John viii. 31, 32. 3. Preparation for the manner of reading, Eccles. iv. 17. 4. Meditation and conference for IXXX LIST OF CATECHISMS. the better keeping of the matter, Deut. vi, 6, 7, etc. 5. Faith to believe it, Heb. iv. 2 ; Jude ver. 20, 21. 6. Obedience to practise it, 1 Sam. XV. 22, 23 ; Jer. vii. 23. 7. Prayer for a blessing upon it, Matt. xxi. 22 ; Mark xi. 24 ; James i. 5." The English Catechisme explained, or a Commentarie on the Short Catechisme, set forth in the Book of Common Prayer, wherein divers necessary questions touching Christian faith are inserted, modern con- troversies handled, doubts resolved, and many cases of conscience cleared. Profitable for ministers in their churches, for schoolmasters in their schooles, and for householders in their families, whereunto is added an antidote against Poperie, by John Mayer, D.D., 4tli edition. London^ 1630. E. 1186. — 1. The Soldiers' Catechism, for soldiers of the Parliament's Army, teaching them their calling was lawful, and they should be Christian as well as courageous soldiers. 2. A Catechisme for children in yeares and children in understanding, chiefly intended for their instruction in the family. London, 1644. 3. The Kernell of Christianity, etc., by Mr. Francis Peck, Pastor at Hartford. London, 1644. 4. The New Catechism according to the form of the Kirk of Scotland, etc., as reprinted in Pt. ii. 5. The Independent's Catechism, by John Bernard, philo-presbyter. London, 1645. 6. The Parliament's Rules and Directions concerning Sacramental Knowledge, etc., as reprinted in Pt. i. 7. The Cavalier's Catechism and Confession of his Faith. London^ 1646-7. 8. A New Catechism commanded to be set forth for the instruction of all those who still affect a reading ministry and the Common Prayer. London, 1646-7. 9. Milk for Babes drawn out of the breasts of both Testaments, chiefly for the spiritual nourishment of Boston babes in either England ; but may be of like use for any children, by John Cotton, B.D., and Teacher of the Church of Boston, New England. London, 1646. 10. A Short Catechism, holding forth and explaining the first prin- ciples of the Oracles of God. London, 1646. Seems to follow the Six Principle!^ of Perhins, but shortens both questions and answers. 11. Children's Bread, or a Briefe Forme of Christian Doctrine neces- sarie for the instruction of such as are ignorant, and for the edification of such as have attained some measure of knowledge, by Tho. Wool- fall, Minister of the Gospel, and Pastor of Staunton, in Northumber- land. London, 1646. 12. A Catechism of several heads of Christian Religion, etc., by Dorothy Burch, Stroud, Kent. London, 1646. 13. A Short Catechism for examination of Communicants, etc. Like No. 6, modelled on Parliament's Ordinance. London, 1646. 14. Parliament's New and Perfect Catechism, fit and necessary to be LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxi known and practised by every old Christian and loyal subject. 1647. Political aud Satirical. 15. Another edition of Cotton's Catechism, No. 9. London, 1648. E. 1185. — 1. A New Catechisme, etc., written by William Good, Minister at Denton in Norfolk (one of the added members of the Westmiuster Assembly). London, 1644. Like Larger Catechism, ex- plains what communicant must do before receiving the Communion, what after he has received, and what at the time of receiving. 2. A Short Catechisme composed according to the rules and directions of the Parliament, etc., by J. B., Minister at Bradford in Somerset. [For No. 3 see \y. Ixxvii.] 4. A Short Catechisme for the instruction of the inhabitants of S. M., for the better preparation for the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. London, 1645. 5. Soldiers' Catechism. 6. Another copy of Good's New Catechisme. 7. A Catechism for the Times, 8. The Anabaptist's Catechism. 9. 10, 11. Catechisms founded on the Rules and Directions contained in the Ordinance of Parliament. No. 9 contains the following questions aud answers : — Q. " What is faith t A. K grace whereby we receive Christ as our perfect Saviour, and rest upon him alone for salvation. Q. What is the special use of Baptism ? -4. To ingraft us into Christ." Q. What is the special use of the Lord's Supper ? A. 1. To make us remember Christ's death ; 2. To make us grow in grace." The Worthy Communicant, whereunto is added a Dialogue between a Minister and a priv^ate Christian, by Jeremiah Dyke. London, 1645. Christianse Catecheseos, Sciographia, etc. Autore Reverendo et Claris- simo viro D. Gulielmo Amesio, S.S.T, Doctore, etc, Amstelodami, 1635. A HeliJe to True Happiness, or a briefe and learned exposition of the maine and fundamentall points of Christian Religion, by Mr. Paul Bayne. London, 1618. (My copy of this treatise bears the autograph of Jeremiah Burro wes.) '2.Toi.x,^i(,)(TLs eloquiorum Dei sive Methodus Religionis Christianse, by John Adamson, Principal of University of Edinburgh, jEdbiburgh, 1637. A Catechism of Christian Religion . . . for the use of the Kirke of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, 1615. Translation of Heidelberg Catechism, appended to Hart's Psalm-book, The Key of Saving Knowledge, wherein the Principles of Christian Religion are unfolded, by George Walker, B.D. London, 1641. IN LIBRARY OF QUEENS' COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. The Doctrine of the Bible, or Rules of Discipline breafly gathered through the whole course of Scrijjture, by way of questions and answers, newly corrected and amended. London, Brewster and Reid, 1633. A Brieviate of Saving Knowledge, or the Principles of Christian Ixxxii LIST OF CATECHISMS. Heligion methodically digested into short questions and answers, pur- posely composed and published for the use and benefit of such as have good desires but weak memories, by J. B. (John Brinsley). London, 1643. A Short Catechisme necessary to be learned by all such as come to the Holy Communion, according to the late Ordinance of Parliament. . . . Humbly commended by the author for uniformity's sake to all the Churches of England, by J. Mayer, D.D. London, 1646. A Short Sum of Christianity, delivered by way of Catechism by that Rev. and famous divine, William Whitaker, Dr. in Divinity. London, 1630. It contains the following questions and answers : — Q. What is the only thing whereunto all our endeavours ought to be directed ? A. To seek everlasting felicity or salvation in this life, that we may fully enjoy it in the life to come. Q. What is salvation? A. Perfect hapi^iness of soul and body for ever. Q. How may we know wherein this consists ? A. By the Scriptures. Q. What be the Scriptures? A. The writings of the apostles and prophets inspired of God, containing a rule of life, to be used of all men, whereby they may be made wise unto salvation. . . . Q. What of God as he is in himself ? A. That he is a spirit, infinite, eternal, present everywhere, knowing all things, most just, most merciful, omnipotent." Whitaker had the very highest reputation as a learned and orthodox theologian. In early life he had translated Nowell's Catechism into Greek, and if his own Catechism was not jmblished till 1630, in all probability it circulated about Cam- bridge either in MS. or privately printed at a considerably earlier date, and may have led Perkins, Preston, Tuckney, and others, when College tutors, to draw up similar manuals. IN LIBRARY OF EMMANUEL COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. A Short Catechism for householders with prayers to the same adjoining, by W. Jaggard. 1620. The Foundations of Christian Religion gathered into six principles, etc. Perkins, London, 1618. A Brief Method of Catechising, etc., by St. Egerton. The 31st edition, newly perused and amended by the author. London, 1621. A Short and Brief e Summe of Saving Knowledge, etc., by A[lexander] R[ichardson]. Jjondon, 1621. Milke for Babes, or a North Countrey Catechisme, made plain and easie to the capacity of the simplest, with household prayers for families and graces for children. The 4th impression, corrected and enlarged by the author, William Crashaw, B.D. , and Preacher of the Word of God at Wliitechapell. London, 1622. Short Questions and Answeares, etc. London, Dawson, 1581, and again, 1622. LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxiii The Tree of Good and Evil, or a profitable and familiar exposition of the Commandments, by Thomas Granger, Preacher of God's Word. London, 1616. An edition of Ball's Short Catechism bearing the date 1616. A Brief Summe of Christian Religion, or of things most necessary for a Christian's knowledge, practice, and comfort ; composed by Thomas Greaves, a Minister of the Gospel, " Simplex breve plenum ut simplicitas aiidientium consulat rusticitati, brevitas memorise, plenitudo doctrinas." Augustinus, London, 1656. 3. A Pastime for Parents, etc., by Arthur Dent, etc. London, 1609. Short Grounds of Catechism, by W. Ward of Guysborough, Yorkshire. Cambridge, 1627. This Library also contains copies of Wilkinson's Catechisme, 3d edition, and of Horn's Brief Instructions for Children. London, 1654. IN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, CAMBRIDGE. A Practical Catechism, or a view of those principall truths of the AVord which most directly tend to life and godliness, the 2d edition enlarged, by D. R., B.D. London, 1633. This Library contains also copies of Jaggard's Short Catechism for Householders, 1614 ; and of Egerton's Brief Method of Catechising, 22d edition, 1615 ; and of Short Questions and Answeares. Dawson, London, 1614. IN TRINITY COLLEGE LIBRARY, CAMBRIDGE. A Cathechisme conteining the summe of Christian Religion, giving a most excellent light to all those that seek to enter the pathway to salva- tion, newly set forth by G. G. (George Gyffard). London, 1583. A Fourme of Catechising in True Religion, consisting in questions and answers with observations thereon for the further declaration and use of the same. Dawson & Bishop, 1581. At the end of the dedication is the name of W. Wood at Middleton Cheinay. Certayne Short Questions and Answeres very profitable and necessary for yong children and such as are desirous to be instructed in the principles of the Christian Fayth. Middleton and Man, 1580. A Shorte and FruitfuU Treatise of the profite and necessitie of catechising, that is, of instructing the youth and ignorant persons in the principles and grounds of Christian Religion, by Robert Caudrey, one of the ministers and preachers of the Word of God in the County of Rutland. London, 1580. At the end of Caudrey's Treatise is a copy of the injunction of the High Commissioners, headed by Grindal, Archbishop of Canterbury, and bearing the date of 1576, "that no youth be admitted to the Lord's table, or to be married, or to be godfather or godmother for any child except they can answer the Little Catechism with additions.^' Ixxxiv LIST OF CATECHISMS. A Brief aud Short Catechisme necessarie for all them that would be Christians indeed to be able to understand and to answer unto. Newberie, London. The address to the Christian reader is signed by Tho. Sparke. The Cathechisme or Manner how to instruct and teach children and others in the Christian faith, etc., newly translated out of Latin and Dutch into English (Heidelberg Catechism). London, 1578. A Fruitfull Treatise of Baptisme and the Lord's Sui)per : of the use and effect of them ; of the worthie and unworthie receivers of the same supper ; very necessarie for all such as are to be admitted to the Lorde's table. Wogran, London. This Library also contains copies of Gee's Grounds of Christianity, and of Craig's Short Sum of Whole Catechism. All the foregoing are included in the volume bearing the press-mark C 5.25. In C 24.20 there is a Short Catechisme, holding forth and explaining the first principles of the oracles of God, apparently founded on that of Perkins, and bearing the date of 1646. IN THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY, OXFORD. S. 302, S. Molineux — contains the following catechisms : — 1. Bernard's Catechism. London, 1632. 2. The Necessity and Antiquity of Catechising, by J. F. London, 1617. 3. The Principles of the true Christian Religion briefly selected out of manie good bookes. First reade and then judge. London, 1590. The preface is signed by Switherne Buttertield. The treatise expounds the Creed, Ten Commandments, Lord's Prayer, and Sacraments, but not in the form of question and answer. 4. A Short and plain Tractate of the Lord's Supper grounded upon 1 Corinthians xi. 23, by William More, Minister of God's Word. London^ 1645. 5. A Brief Dialogue concerning preparation for the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper, taken for the most part out of the sermons of Dodd and Cleaver touching that subject. London, 1633. 6. Maine's Catechism Abridged, or the ABC enlarged, with many necessary questions fitted into it for the benefit of all that desire to teach or learn it effectually, etc. 7tli edition. London, 1639, 7. A Pill to purge out Popery, etc. London, 1624. 8. Contemplations for the institution of children in the Christian Religion, collected and published by John Carpenter. 9. A Short Catechism, very necessary for the plain understanding of the principal points of Christian Religion meet to be practised of all Christians before they be admitted to the Lord's Supper. Richard Cox, London, 1620. 10. A Short Catechism for householders. London, 1624. This catechism begins : Q. What should be the chief desire and endeavour of every Christian in this life? A. To seek the glory of God LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxv and to obtain happiness and salvation of his own soul. Q, How may we obtain that? A. By keeping covenant with God, etc. 11. A Brief and necessary Catechism concerning the principall points of Christian Religion, written for the good of all such as seek after Con- solation in Christ, by R. C. London, 1602. 12. A Brief Catechism of Christian Religion compressed into a short volume containing in it four little books : the lirst treateth of Sacraments in general, the second of Baptism, the third of Circumcision, the fourth of the Lord's Supper, collected out of divers places of Scripture, very necessary for all that desire to know the sacraments and the benefits that we receive by them. London, 1581. Th. Sc. 17. BS. — 1. The Rules and Directions of the Ordinance of Parliament concerning suspension from the Lord's Supper in case of ignorance, resolved into a Short Catechism. London, 1648. 2. A Scripture Catechism, very useful in these times for advancing truth, suppressing error, settling present controversies, vindicating the Covenanted Reformation. London, 1646. 3. Scripture Security for Conscience, reconciling the safety of truth with the safety of persons by an honest counterplot to keep off the execution of an expected Ordinance. It is a defence of the Ordinance against heresies and blasphemies, turning its provisions into a Catechism, and backing them with Scripture. 4. Children's Bread, or A Brief Form of Christian Doctrine, necessary for the instruction of such as are ignorant, and for the edification of such as have attained some measure of knowledge, by Tho. Woolfall, Staunton, Northumberland. London, 1646. 5. A Catechisme in brief questions and answers, containing such things as are to be known or had by all such as would partake of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper with comfort, by John Geree, sometime minister of the Word in Tewxbury, now pastor of St. Faith's. London, 1647. 6. A Catechism for Children in years, and children in understanding, etc. the second impression, by J. S. of Tenby. London, 1650. 7. The Principles of the Doctrine of Christ unfolded in two short Catechisms, etc., for the use of the congregation of Fordham in Essex, by John Owen, pastor thereof. 1645. 8. The Chief Grounds of Christian Religion set down by way of catechising, etc., by Ezekiel Rogers. London, 1648. 9. The Enlargement of a former Catechism which contained in briefe the grounds and principles of Christian Religion. That shewed what we ought to believe, this upon what ground we ought so to believe, both which are necessary in the faith of every Christian, gathered at the first and since enlarged by D. V., etc. London, 1641. 10. A Catechism of Christians, to help them in the right understanding of their Christian obligation by baptism, by Richard Hunt, M.A., some- time Fellow of Emmanuel College in Cambridge. London, 1649. 11. Short Principles of Religion. London, 1644. Ixxxvi LIST OF CATECHISMS. 12. A Scripture Enquiry or help for the memory in duties of Piety, by T. B[elke]. London, 1642. 13. The Main Points of Church Government and Discipline, etc., by Chr[istopher] Love. London, 1649. 14. The Kernell of Christianity, containing a short yet full summe of our Communion with Christ, by Fr. Peck, M.A. and pastor of Hartford. London, 1646. Sop. 270. Th. — 1. The Summe of Christian religion comprehended in six principal questions, serving for the instruction of the simpler sort, etc. London, 1617. 2. The Principles of Christian religion breefly set down in questions and answers, very necessary and profitable for all persons before they be admitted to the Lord's Supper, by William Attersol. London, 1635. 3. The Householder's help for domesticall discipline, or A familiar con- ference of household instruction and correction tit for the godly govern- ment of Christian families, dedicated to all religious householders, by R. R., Minister of God's Word. London, 1615. 4. Directions for the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper, with some few questions to the same purpose, by Robert Jenison, B.D., at Newcastle- upon-Tyne. London, 1624. 5. A Briefe Dialogue concerning preparation for the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper, etc. London, 1627. Earlier edition of Catechism in S. 302. 6. Winter Evening's Communication with young novices in religion, or Questions and Answers about certain chief grounds of Christian Religion, wherein every answer rightly understood hath the force of an oracle of God, by John Carter, preacher of God's Word. Cambridge, 1628. 7. A Catechism contayning a short exposition of the points in the ordinary Catechism, etc. — being 2d edition of Wilkinson's Catechism. London, 1624. 8. The Principal Grounds of Christian Religion briefly and plainly pro- pounded — Byfield's Manual. London, 1625. 9. A Brief and Necessary Catechism, with a short instruction for all that do receive the Holy Communion, by R. Jones. London. 10. A Catechisme composed according to the order of the Catechism of the Common Prayer Booke, etc., by M. N[icholls], B.D., P.P. 2d edition. London, 1631. 11. A Brief and Necessary Catechism concerning the principal points of our Christian Religion, Written for the good of all such as seek after consolation in Christ, by R. C, etc. London, 1602. 12. Certain Briefe Questions and Answers concerning the chief poynts of Christian Religion gathered for the use of the young people of the parish of S. Andrewes, Eastcheap, and may serve generally for all places, by N. A. London. Along with various graces and prayers, it contains the Confession adopted by Knox's congregation at Geneva. 13. A Briefe Exposition of the Principles of Christian Religion gathered out of the Holy Scriptures for the benefit of all that are desirous to heare LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxvii sermons and to receive the Sacraments with comfort, by R. Webb. London, 1617. 14. A Short Summe of the whole Catechism wherein the question is pro- pounded and answered for the greater ease of the common people and children of St. Saverie's (Saviour's) in Southwarke, first gathered by Mr. Thomas Ratcliffe, Minister of God's Word in S. S. Southwarke. London, 1619. (The title is almost or altogether identical with that of Craig's Catechism, Edinburgh, 1581.) 8° m. 188, contains Twisse, Palmer, Bernard, Gouge, Ball, etc. Art. Bs, besides Hieron's and Burton's Catechisms and Gardiner's Confession and Catechism for Householders, contains also — A Breefe Explanation of the Common Catechism distinguished into three parts : 1, of the privileges ; 2, of the duties of a Christian ; 3, of the Holy Sacraments, the pledges and bonds both of the one and the other, by R'^. Allein, pastor of Ditchart in Somersetshire. 2d edition, London, 1631. The Sweet Milke of Christian Doctrine in a plain and natural method by question and answer for their better understanding for whom it is chiefly written. London, 1617. The Epistle to the inhabitants and people of Leigh, Essex, is signed by John Syme. The three first questions and answers are similiar in purport to those in the Shorter Catechism. Th. 8vo, C. 170. — The Elements of the Beginning of the Oracles of God containing the whole grounds of Christian Religion in a Short Catechism for yong children and a larger method of catechising, etc. London, 1619. Th. 8vo, m. 56. Motives to Godly knowledge, with a brief instruction very necessary to be learned and understood of every one before he be admitted to partake of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, also a sweet comfort for a Christian being tempted. London, 1613. Spirituall Food and Physicke, viz., Milke for the yonger. Meat for the stronger. The Substance of Divinity, And a pill to purge out Popery. The 4th edition, corrected and enlarged by the author, John Mico, preacher of God's Word in Exeter. London, n.d. IN LAMBETH LIBRARY, LONDON. XpLaTiavio-fxov '2T0Lx^i(ocns, probably Whitaker's Greek translation of Nowell's Catechism published in London by John Day, 1578. The Humble Advice of the Assemblie of Divines now by authority of Parliament sitting at Westminster concerning A Shorter Catechism with the Poofs [sic) thereof out of the Scriptures presented by them lately to both Houses of Parliament. John Streaton, London. A Light from Christ leading unto Christ by the star of his word, or A Divine Directory to self-examination, the better to prepare for a trial and approbation of knowledge and their graces in such as by the ministej" and elders are to be admitted into a Reformed Church Communion to partake of soul-cherishing virtue from Christ at the Lord's table ; profitable for persons and families in private, or congregations in public j Ixxxviii LIST OF CATECHISMS. by Immanuel Bourne, M.A., of Asheover, in the County of Darby, Preacher of the Gospel to the congregation of St. Sepulchre's Church, London. The 2d edition, Wright, London^ 1647. This treatise contains both a large and shorter Catechism. It defines God as " a spirit infinite in all perfections," gives prominence to the Covenants, and defines faith as " a special grace of God by which a man or woman is enabled to receive Christ as he is held forth in the promise of the gospel and to rest upon him alone for salvation." It enumerates as benefits bestowed by Christ on his people : 1. Election; 2. Hedemption; 3. Effectual Vocation; 4. Free Justification ; 5. Sanctification ; 6. Adoption ; 7. Spirit's presence and work. The Library also contains a copy of Alsted's Latin Catechism, of date mdcxxii. In K12.52, prefixed to Culverwell's Treatise of Faith, are Questions and Answers upon a small tract written by Mr. Ezekiel Culverwell, touching the way to a blessed state in this life. The following are specimens of these questions and answers : — " Q. What is the estate of drowsie professors t A. A. little grace they have but mixed with grosse failings. Q. What is the estate of such as have more life of faith ? A. They endeavour to walk every way unrebukably. Q. May such an estate be enjoyed in this life? A. Yea, doubtless, after divers measures according to the grace which they have received. Q. By what means may such a blessed state be enjoyed ? A. By an often and plentiful feeding upon Christ. Q. Why by feeding upon Christ? A. Because of his fulness we receive grace for grace," etc. It bears the date of 1648. In G15.80, besides several catechisms, there is a treatise on the Sacrament by John Prime, which defines a Sacrament as " a sensible sign to the eyes, instituted of God to be continued in His church for the further assurance and increase of spiritual graces." The same Library contains a copy of the Italian Catechism of Bernardino Ochino of Sienna, and two treatises of Martinius of Bremen De Universd Doctrind Christiana. m SIGN COLLEGE LIBRARY, LONDON WALL. 1. A Treatise of Christian Religion on the whole body and substance of Divinity by T. C. (Thomas Cartwright). London, 1616. 2. The Same Contracted into a Brief Catechisme. London, 1616. This last was also published separately without the author's name or initials. A copy of such an edition I have in my library, appended to Knighte's " Exposition of the Ten Commandments." IN SCOTTISH LIBRARIES. The following are bound together in a volume kindly lent me from the Library of the University of Edinburgh, viz. : — 1. Joshua's Resolution for the Well-Ordering of his Household, a twofold Catechisme, one short, the other more large, etc., by Richard Bernard, pastor at Batcombe, in LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxix Somersetshire {London, 1625) ; 2. A Catechisine, conteyning siimmarely the chief points of Christian Religion, made dialogue-wise by brief questions and short answers, written by Patrick Galloway, and by him used in the family of the Scottish noblemen at Newcastle {London, 1588) ; 8. A Short Catechisme, summarily comprising the principal points of Christian Faith, somewhat corrected and augmented by James Balmford, minister, etc., 6th edition [London, 1610) ; 4. A Short Catechisme, wherein are briefly handled the fundamental principles of Christian Eeligion, needfuU to be learned of all Christians before they be admitted to the Lord's Table, 8th edition, by William Gouge [London, 1636) ; 5. Points of Instruction for the Ignorant, with an Examination before our comming to the Lord's Table, etc., by Eobert Horn [London, 1613) ; 6. The Doctrine of the Beginning of Christ ; short for memory, plain for capacity, delivered almost in the express words of the text by Samuel Hieron, minister of the Gospell [London, 1632) ; 7. A Brief and Necessarie Catechisme, with a short instruction for all that doe receive the Holy Communion, set forth bj^ Richard Jones, schoolmaster at Cardiffe [London) ; 8. An Helpe for Young People, preparing them for the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper, by W. L., B.D. [London, 1640) ; 9. Short Questions and Answeares, conteining the summe of Christian Religion, newly enlarged with the testimonies of Scrij)ture, etc., by Robert Openshaw [London, 1633) ; 10. A Compendious Forme and Summe of Christian Doctrine, called the testimonie of a true faith, etc., by Christopher Sbutte, M.A. [London, 1637); 11. The Summe of Christian Religion comprehended in sixe principal questions serving for instruction of the simpler sorts, etc., by John Sprint [London, 1607). The following, contained in a volume kindly lent me from the Library of the New College, Edinburgh, are all of them framed on the Calvinistic system, and embody with more or less fulness the doctrine of the Covenants as set forth in the Westminster standards, viz. : — 1. Short grounds of Catechism delivered by way of question and answer, etc., by William Ward, minister of the Word at Guysbrough, in Cleaveland, within Yorkshire [Camhr/dr/e, 1627) ; 2. Milk for Babes and Meat for Men, or principles necessary to be known and learned of such as would know Christ here or be known of him hereafter, by Hugh Peters, some- time lecturer at St. Sepulchre's, London, now teacher in New England [London, 1641) ; 3. The Principles of Christian Religion briefly set down in questions and answers, very necessary and profitable for all persons before they be admitted to the Lord's Supper, by William Attersoll (London, 1635) ; 4. The Chief Heads of Divinitie briefly and orderly set down in forme of catechising by question and answer [by William Ames] [Dordrecht, 1612) ; 5. A Plaine and Familiar Exposition upon the Creed, X. Commandments, Lord's Prayer, and Sacraments, etc., by Josias White [London, 1632) ; 6. A Short Preparation to the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper by way of questions and answers, made 9 XC LIST OF CATECHISMS. by John Baker, a Palatine exile, etc. [London, 1645) ; 7. A Brief Method of Catechising, etc., by St. Egerton ; 8. A Path to Pietie, lead- ing to the way, the truth, and the life- — Christ Jesus, etc., by William Hinde, preacher of God's Word at Bunbury, Cheshire [London, 1626) ; 9. A Forme of Catechising set down by questions and answers wherein the principal grounds of Christian Religion are delivered, by Edward Elton, preacher of the Word of God in the parish of St. Mary Magdalene, Bermondsey [London, 1634); 10. A Short Catechism, the 7th edition [London, 1632) ; 11. A Key of Knowledge for catechising children in Christ, by Richard Webb, preacher of God's Word at Rodborough, in Gloucestershire [London, 1622) ; 12. The Chief e Grounds of Christian Religion set down by way of Catechising, gathered long since for the use of an honourable family, by Ezekiel Rogers, minister of God's Word, sometime of Rowley in Yorkshire, now in New England [London, 1642). A volume in the Library of the Church of Scotland contains the following : — 1. The Foundation of Christian Religion gathered into sixe Principles, and it is to bee learned of ignorant people that they may bee fit to heare sermons with profit and to receeve the Lord's Supper with comfort. London, Leggat, 1635. This is Perkins' famous catechism. An eai-lier edition in the British Museum has appended to it another catechism in the manuscript, but the leaves have been mis^ilaced in binding it. 2. A Short Catechisme. Seventh edition. London, 1632. Said to be by White of Dorchester. 3. A Catechisme or Institution of Christian Religion to be learned of all youth next after the little Catechisme appointed in the Booke of Common I'rayer. Nowells, London, 1633. 4. The Doctiine of the beginning of Christ, etc., by Samuel Hieron, minister of the gospell. London, 1635. 5. A Path to Pietie, leading to the way, the truth, and the life — Jesus Christ, ... by William Hinde, . . . preacher of God's Word at Bunbury, Cheshire. London, 1626. 6. Short Questions and Ausweares contayning the Summe of Christian Religion (Pagitt). London, Dawson, 1635. 7. A Briefe Catecheticall Exposition of Christian Doctrine, etc., as on p. Ixxv. (Twisse's Catechism.) London, 1633. 8. Grounds of Christian Religion laid downe briefly and plainely b}' way of Question and Answer, by H. B. (Henry Burton). London, 1636. 9. The Scope of the Scripture, containing a briefe exposition of the Apostles' Creed, the tenne Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the Sacraments, by short questions and answers ; by H. Vesey, late minister of God's Word at H. B. in Essex. Ljondon, 1633. 10. A short Catechisme wherein are briefly handled the fundamental! principles of Christian Religion, etc., 7th edition, by William Goxige, London. 1635. LIST OF CATECHISMS. XCl In a separate case in same Library : — 1. A Short Catechisme contayning the Principles of Eeligion, verie profitable for all sorts of people (Ball's). r2th impression, London, 1628. 2. A brief and methodical Catechism (by Zachary Cawdrey). London, 1664. .3. Shorter Catechism in Hebrew, by W, Seaman, M.D. London, 1689. CORRIGENDA. Page xxvi, line 18, after copy insert of. xxxvi, line 26, for form read for. xlii, line 22, for two or three read ten or twelve. 70, line 11, delete comma after marvellous. 84, line 32, before thyself insert to, 96, line 9, /or even read ever. 236, line \S,for breaking read brawling. 239, line 12, for o^ read on. Part I. THE SHORTER CATECHISM OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY AND ITS PURITAN PRECURSORS THE SHOETER CATECHISM OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY OF DIVINES COMPARED WITH ITS PURITAX PKECURSORS. Quest. 1. TFhat is the chief end of man ? A. Man's chief end is to glorifie God, and to enjoy him for ever. Quest 1. Q. Quis humanae vitae prcecipuns est finis ? Ut Deum . . . homines ipsi noverint. — Calvin. A che fine e creato Fhuomo ? Per conoscer, amar et goder eternamente Deo. — Gagl'iardi. Para servir a Dios en esta vida e despues della gozarle en la otra eternamente. — Spanish. What is the chief and principal end of our being, etc. ? A. That we may glorify God, and work out our own salvation. — Syme^s Sweet Milk of Christian Doctrine, 1617. Wherefore hath God made . . . you? A. To seek His glory. — Pagefs Summe of ChHstian Religion; 02^enshaiv''s Summe of Christian Religion. That he , . . should seek God's glory and his own salvation. — Rogers' Chief Grounds of Christian Religion. To glorify God and save his soul. — BalVs Short Catechisme. To glorify God and save his own soul. — Palmer^s Endeavour of making the Principles of Christian Religion easie. Q. 2. JFhat rule hath God given to direct its hoiu we may glorifie and enjoy him ? A. The Word of God (which is contained in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament) is the onely rule to direct us how we may glorifie and enjoy him. Quef>t. 2. Q. What certain ride have ice left iis for our direction in the knowledge of the true religion ? — A. The holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, etc. — Ussher's Method of Christian Religion. The Word of God contained in the Scriptures. — Ussher's Principles of Christian Religion. The holy Scriptures contained in the Old and New Testament. — Gangers Short Catechisme. The divine and sacred word of" God, only contained in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament. — Syme. — See also Ball, p. 67. 4 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. ^.3. TVhat do the Scriptures princijmlly teach ? A. The Scriptures principally teach what man is to believe concerning God, and what duty God requires of man. Quest. 3. Q. How many things doth the Word teach us principally ? — Paget. — A. All points of faith that we are bound to believe, and all good duties that we are bound to practise. — Ussher's Principles. Q. How many things doth this ancient and apostoHc belief teach you? — A. It teacheth me what to believe first concerning God. — Ecjerton^s Form of Examining. They do teach me my duty to God and my neighbour. — Bernard. What doth the Scripture especially teach us ? — Ball, p. 68. Q. 4. IFhat is God ? A. God is a Sj)irit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, in his being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth. Quest. 4. God is a being infinite in all perfection. — Palmer. God is a Spirit of infinite perfection. — Gouge. A most holy Spirit, infinite in all perfections. — Ca. of 1646. God is one holy Spirit, having being of himself. — Rogers. He is a Spirit, having his being of himself. — Ball. God is a Spirit, or spiritual substance, most wise, most holy, eternal, infinite. — Perkins' Foundation of Christian Religion; also Elton''s Form of Catechising. God is a Spirit, most perfect, most wise, almighty, and most holy. — Ussher's Principles. God is a Spirit, one, almighty, eternal, infinite, unchangeable being, absolutely holy, wise, just, and good. — J. F.'s Compendious Catechism. A spiritual, eternal, unchangeable, and infinite being, perfectly good, just, holy, wise, and mighty. — White's Short Catechism. Q. Which be his chief properties ? — A. Infiniteness, eternity, and unchangeableness, etc. — Rogers. Q. What be his communicable properties? — A. They are chiefly five: holiness, wisdom, power, justice, and goodness, all which are eternal, infinite, and unchangeable like himself. — Egerton^s Brief Method. He is most holy, that is, of infinite wisdom, mercy, love, goodness, etc. — Perkins. Infinite in his being . . . in wisdom ... in power . . . injustice . . . and in mercy. — Bernard's Larger Catechism. Infinite in knowledge, wisdom, power, mercy, truth, justice, love, and all perfection of blessedness whatsoever. — Webb's Key of Knowledge. Infinite in time ... in place ... in wisdom ... in power . . . in mercy . . . injustice . . . in glory and majesty. — Vesey's Scope of the Scrijyture. Q. 5. Are there more Gods than one ? A. There is but one onely, the living and true God. Quest. 5. There is but one God. — Bedford, Palmer. There is but one God only. — Newcomen. Q. Are there any more Gods than one ? — A. To us there is but one God. — Hieron. No, there is only one God, though in that one Godhead there be three persons. — Ussher's Principles. There is but one God alone, distinguished into three persons. — Vesey. There is THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 5 hut one onely, true, living, immortal and everlasting God. — Becori's New Catechism. Q. How many Gods be there ? — A. Only one God. — Ball. Q. 6. Hoio many persons are there in the Godhead ? A. There are three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost ; and these three are one God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory. Quest. 6. There are three persons in the divine substance ... of the same eternity, power, and majesty. — Becon. Three distinct persons, in eternity, in power, in dignity eqiial, in Godhead one. — Kowell. Three persons, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, eqnal in eternity, iMwer, and majesty. — Vesey. There be three distinct persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and these three persons are equal in eternity and glory. — Elton^s Shorter Form of Catechising. See also Pcdmer, p. 100. Q. 7. What are the decrees of God ? A. The decrees of God are his eternal purpose, according to the counsel of his will, whereby, for his own glory, he hath fore-ordained whatsoever comes to pass. Quest. 7. Q. What is God's decree ? — A. The eternal counsel and purpose of God, whereby he set down within himself whatsoever should come to pass in time. — Newcomen, Ball. It is his unchangeable appoint- ment concerning all things. — Whitens Catechism. It is that act whereby God, according to his free will, did fore-appoint and determine of all things . . . even from all eternity. — Ames' Chief Heads of Divinity. He did, before all time, by his unchangeable counsel, ordain w^hatsoever afterwards should come to pass. — Ussher's Principles. God from all eternity, according to his free will, did by his unchangeable counsel and purpose fore-appoint and certainly determine of all things ... to the manifestation of his own glor3^ — Ussher's Body of Divinity. The fore- appointing of all things before all time to his own glory. — Egerton. Q. 8. Hoiv doth God execute his decrees ? A. God executeth his decrees in the works of Creation and Providence. Quest. 8. Q. How is God's decree executed ? — A. By the creation of all things, and by his providence. — White. In the works of the creation and providence. — Ussher's Method. In the works of creation and the work of God's providence. — DennisorCs Compendioiis Catechism. Q. 9. JVJiat is the work of Creation ? A. The work of Creation is, God's making all things of nothing, by the word of his power, in the space of six dayes, and all very good. 6 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Quest. 9. God's making of the world and of all things out of nothing by his word. — Baker's Short Catechism. That work of God, wherein by his word he made all things of nothing exceeding good. — White. God, by his word alone, did in the space of six days, create all things . . . every one of them exceeding good in their kind. — Ussher's Method. Q. How did God make all things? — A. By his word, of nothing, in six days, very good. — Gouge. See also Ball, p. 69. Q. 1 0. How did God create man ? A. God created man male and female, after his own image, in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, with dominion over the creatures. Quest. 10. A reasonable creature consisting of soul and body, made after the image of God in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness. — Honi's Points of Instructione. He made the man of the dust of the earth, and woman out of man, and both of them, as well male as female, in his own image. Q. Wherein standeth the image of God ? — A. Chiefly in these three things, knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness. — Egerton. In dominion over the creatures. — Elton. See also Palmer, p. 105. ^.11. What are God's works of Providence ? A. God's works of Providence are, his most holy, wise, and powerful preserving and governing all his creatures, and all their actions. Quest. 11. His preserving and governing his creatures with all things belonging unto them. — Ussher. With all their actions. — Ball. God's preserving and governing of all things made. — Baker. That work of God whereby he sustaineth all things by his power, and directeth them by his wisdom to their appointed ends. — White. The ruling and govern- ing of all things most wisely, mightily, and righteously. — Egerton. Q. 12. What speciall act of providence did God exercise toward man in the estate wherein he was created ? A. When God had created man, he entred into a covenant of life with him, upon condition of perfect obedience ; forbid- ding him to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, upon pain of death. Quest. 12. Q. What is that special order of government which God used toward man in the beginning? — A. It pleased Almighty God to enter into covenant with man, the sum of which covenant was : Do this and live ; if thou doest it not thou shalt die the death. — A mes. Q. How did God deal with man after he made him? — A. He made a covenant with Adam, and in him with all mankind. — Ussher's Principles. Promis- ing everlasting life upon condition that he perform entire and perfect THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 7 obedience unto his law . . . and in like sort threatening death unto him if he did not perform the same. — Ussher's Method. Q. 1 3. Did our first parents continue in the estate wherein they were created? A. Our first parents, being left to the freedom of their own will, fell from the estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God. Quest. 13. Q. Did man continue in the estate in which he was created? — A. No ; he left it and fell from righteousness to sin. Q. How did our first parents yield to temptation being created good ? — A. Being left by- God to the liberty and mutability of their own will they voluntarily inclined to that evil to which they were tempted. — Ussher. Being left of God to the liberty of his will, etc. — JRogers. Q. Did man and woman, thus made, continue in this holy and blessed state ? — A. No ; they fell from it and became cursed and miserable creatures. Q. How did they fall? — A. By the enticement of the devil and their own wilful dis- obedience in breaking the commandment of God. — Egerton. Q. 14. What is sin? A. Sin is any want of conformity unto, or transgression of, the Law of God. t. 14. Peccatum est quicquid non congruit cum norma legis divinae . . . est defectus vel inclinatio vel actio pugnans cum lege Dei. — Chytraei Catechesis. Any breach of the law of God, if it be no more than the least ivant of that which the law requireth. — Perkins ; also Ussher'' s Body of Divinity. Any swerving from the law of God, though it be but in the least want, etc., as above. — Elton. A transgression of the law either in want of what, or doing otherwise than what, the law requireth. — Josias White. Any declination from, or transgression of, the law of God. — Newcomen. ^.15. JFhat was the sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they were created ? A. The sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden fruit. Quest. 15. Disobedience against God in eating the forbidden fruit. — Ca. of 1646. In general it was disobedience, the degrees whereof were first infidelity, then pride, and lastly the disavowing of subjection, by eating the forbidden fruit. — Ames. The eating of the forbidden fruit. — Ball. ^.16. Did all mankinde fall in Adam's first transgression ? A. The Covenant being made with Adam, not onely for 8 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. himself, but for his posterity, all mankind, descending from him, by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him, in his first transgression. Quest. 16. Q. Did tliis estate determine in Adam's person? — A, No; for he was the head and root of all mankind, who had received grace and strength for himself and all his posterity, and so lost the same for all, and now we are all conceived and born in sin and unto misery. — Ames. All we that are their children are guilty of the same sin, for we all sinned in them. — Ussher^s Principles. In the first covenant the sin of the first Adam is reckoned to all the posterity that descend from him by carnal generation, because they were in him, and of him, and one with him. — Ussher's Body of Divinity. Q. In whom is that corruption found? — A. In all . , . descending from Adam by natural generation. — Elton. Q. 1 7. Into what estate did the fall bring mankinde ? A. The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and misery. Quest. 17. Q. What are you since by Adam's fall? — A. A sinner, and by sin subject to all kind of misery and punishments. — Horn. We are conceived in sin and born in iniquity unto misery. — Ussher. Q. 18. Wherein consists the sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell ? A. The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consists in the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of Original righteous- ness, and the corruption of his whole nature, (which is commonly called Original Sin,) together with all actuall transgressions which proceed from it. Quest. 18. First, the corruption of nature called original sin, . . . and then actual sin arising from hence. — Ussher' s Method. Q. Wherein doth that originall sinne consist ? — A. First, in the imputation of that sinne which in our first parents we did commit ; secondly, in the want of God's righteous and holy image ; thirdly, in that inclination which we have unto evill ; and, lastly, in the first motions of evill that arise therefrom. — Ames. Guiltiness in Adam's first offence, that is, a deprivation of all good thereby, and a disposition of my whole heart to everything that is against the law, with innumerable corrupt fruits thereof in thought, word, and deed. — Horn. First, in the guilt of that one rebellious act in Adam ; secondly, in corruption thence lineally derived, in full want of all saving grace, and depravation of all the faculties and powers of soul and body, and proneness of the same to all evil continually. — Syme's Christian Doct7'ine. The guiltiness of Adam's sin, and the disorder of the whole man, brought upon all mankind by the fall of Adam, whereby they want the righteousness which ought to be in them, and have that unrighteous- THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 9 ness which ought not to be in them, which makes them inclinable to actual sin, being the fountain thereof. — Elnathan Parr. Q. Wherein doth the sinfulness that is in us consist ? — A. In our sin both original and actual. Original sin is, first, the want of that original righteousness that once was, and still ought to be, in man ; and, secondly, an hereditary corruption of his whole nature. Actual sin is that sin which proceeds from the corruption of nature, etc. — Vesey. Q. 19. What is the misery of that estate whereinto man fell ? A. All mankinde by their fall lost communion with God, are under his wrath and curse, and so, made liable to all miseries in this life, to death itself, and to the pains of hell for ever. Quest. 19. He is continually subject to the curse of God in his lifetime, in the end of his life, and after this life. — Perkinn. Liable to God's curse for sin, etc., as above. — Elton. The wrath and curse of God, by whose just sentence man for his sin is delivered into the power both of bodily and spiritual death, begun here, and to be accomplished in the life to come. — Ussher. jTAe foss o/6^oc^'s/afoztr and former happiness, . . . the curse of God, . . . all miseries in this life, death in the end, and hell ever after. — Egerton. Q. 20. Bid God leave all mankinde to perish in the estate of sin and misery ? A. God having, out of his meer good pleasure, from all eter- nity, elected some to everlasting life, did enter into a Covenant of grace, to deliver them out of the estate of sin and misery, and to bring them into an estate of salvation by a Redeemer. Quest. 20. Q. Did God leave mankind in this woeful state ? — A. No ; but of his free and undeserved mercy entered into a new covenant with mankind [by which] grace and life everlasting is freely offered by God unto all that be made partakers of his Son Jesus Christ, who alone is mediator between God and man. — Ussher's Principles. Q. 21. Who is the Redeemer of God's Elect ? A. The onely Redeemer of God's Elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the Eternal Son of God, became man, and so was, and continueth to be, God and man in two distinct Natures, and one Person, for ever. Quest. 21. He is God the Son, the second person of the Trinity, become man for us, by an inseparable and unfused union of his divine and human natures and properties, and so is both God and man in one person. — Syme. Jesus Christ, . . . the eternal Son of God, made man in all things j even in his infirmities like other men, save only in sin. — 1 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Perkins. Jesus Christ, . . . the eternall Sonne of God, made man like to us in all things, sin only excepted, and so God and man in one person. — Elton. Q. What are we further to know and believe touching Christ's being God and man ? — A. That these two natures are distinct one from another, and that they are also united, and make but one person. — Elton. Q. 22. How did Christ, being the Son of God, become man ? A. Christ, the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, and born of her, yet without sin. Quest. 22. Q. How came Christ to be man? — A. By taking our nature to himself, being conceived by the Holy Ghost, and born by the Virgin Mary. — Egerton's Brief Method, p. 6. He took to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived in time by the Holy Ghost, and born of the Virgin Mary, and so became very man like unto us in all things, even in our infirmities (sin only excepted). — Ussher. Q. 2 3. IFhat Offices doth Christ execute as our Redeemer ? A. Christ, as our Redeemer, executeth the Offices of a Prophet, of a Priest, and of a King, both in his estate of Humiliation and Exaltation. Quest. 23. Q. What be the several functions and offices of Christ as he is Mediator ? — A. These three : namely, his Prophetical, Priestly, and Kingly Office. Christ was anointed to be the only Prophet, Priest, and King of his church. — Elton. A. He is a Priest, a Prophet, and a King. — Perkins. Q. Shew now in what state did Christ . . . perform this three- fold office? — A. In a twofold estate : 1. Of abasement and humiliation; 2. Of advancement and exaltation. — Ussher. Quests. 21 and 23. Jesus Christ our Lord, who being God, and there- fore able, did take our nature upon him, that he might be fit to discharge the offices of a prophet, priest, and king, as was required for the working of our salvation. — Ames. Q. 24. How doth Christ execute the office of a Prophet ? A. Christ executeth the office of a Prophet, in revealing to us, by his Word and Spirit, the will of God for our salvation. Quest. 24. In that he declared the ivhole loill of his Father by himself and by his servants, and confirmed the same by so many signs and wonders. — Ames. To reveal unto his church the way and means of sal- vation, and this he doth outwardly hy the ministry of his word, and in- wardly by the teaching of his Holy Spirit. — Perkins. That he might reveal unto us the whole counsel and will of God concerning our salvation. — Catechism o/ 1619. THE SHOllTER CATECHISM. 1 1 Q. 25. How doth Christ execute the office of a Priest ? A. Christ executeth the office of a Priest, in his once offering up of himself a sacrifice to satisfie divine justice, and reconcile* us to God ; and in making continuall intercession for us. Quest. 25. Jesns Christ our High Priest became obedient even unto the death, offering up himself a sacrifice once, for all, to make a full satis- faction for all our sins, and maketh continual intercession to the Father in our name, whereby the wrath of God is appeased, his justice is satisfied, and we are i-econciled. — Uasher's Body of Divinity. In that he was obedient unto the death, giving himself as a sacrifice, and making intercession in our name, whereby, etc., as in Ussher. — Ames. First, by making satisfaction to his Father for the sin of man ; secondly, by making intercession. — Perkins. Q. Why must he be a priest? — A. To offer sacrifice for his church, and to reconcile us unto God. — Ussher. That by the sacrifice of himself once offered, he might reconcile us unto God and continually make intercession for us. — C. 1619. To make full satisfaction, and also continual intercession for us. — Gouge. Q. 26. Hoiv doth Christ execute the office of a King ? A. Christ executeth the office of a King, in subduing us to himself, in ruling and defending us, and in restraining and con- quering all his and our enemies. Quest. 26. By all that power which he did manifest, as well in van- quishing death and hell, as ingathering the people unto himself which he had formerly ransomed, and in ruling them being gathered, as also in defending of them and applying those blessings unto them which he hath purchased for them. — Ames, also Ussher. By an effectual bestowing of grace upon his chosen subjects and destroying of his enemies. — Ca. of 1644. By ruling and defending of us by the power of his might and Spirit. — Syme. Q. 27. JFherein did Christ's Humiliation consist ? A. Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born, and that in a low condition, made under the law, undergoing the miseries of this life, the wrath of God, and the cursed death of the cross ; in being buried, and continuing under the power of death for a time. Quest. 27. Q. What was his estate of humiliation ? — A. It was the base condition of a servant whereto he humbled himself from his conception to his cross, and so until the time of his resurrection. Q. Why is he said to be born ? — A. To assure us of his true humanity, even by his infancy and infirmity. Q. What are the more general things which he suffered in this life ? — A. Infirmities in his flesh; indignities from the world, and 12 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. temptations from the Devil, [and] those manifold calamities, poverty, hunger, thirst, weariness, reproach. Q. Unto what death was he so obedient ? — A. Even unto the most reproachful, painful, and dreadful death, the death of the cross. Q. What befel our Saviour after his soul was separated from his body ? — A. He was buried, and went to Hades, or, as we commonly speak, descended into hell, Q. What is meant by this ? — A. That, departing this life, he went in his soul to heaven, and was in his body under the very power and dominion of death for a season. Q. Hitherto of his sufiferings, what is the other part of his satisfaction ? — A. His perfect righteousness, whereby he did that which we were not able to do, and absolutely fulfilled the whole law of God for us. — Ussher's Body of Divinity. Q. 28. Wherein consisteth Christ's Exaltation ? A. Christ's Exaltation consisteth in his rising again from the (lead on the third day, in ascending up into Heaven, in sitting at the right hand of God the Father, and in coming to judge the world at the last day. Quest. 28. Q. What is his estate of exaltation ? — A. His glorious con- dition beginning at the instant of his resurrection and comprehending his ascension, sitting at the right hand of God his Father, and the second coming in glory to judge the world. — Ussher. Q. 29. How are we raade partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ ? A. We are made partakers of the Redemption purchased by Christ, by the effectual Application of it to us by his Holy Spirit. How are men made partakers of the benefit of those things which Christ did and suffered? — Oouge. By the Holy Spirit. — Ca. 1619. Q. 30. How doth the Spirit apply to us the Redemption purchased by Christ ? A. The Spirit applieth to us the Redemption purchased by Christ, by working Faith in us, and thereby uniting us to Christ in our Effectual Calling. Quest. 30. Wherein doth the power of the Holy Ghost most appear ? — A. In conferring and applying . . . Christ's merits unto his church and children.— /fmtZe's Pathway. Q. To whom doth this redemption, pur- chased by Christ and applied by the Spirit belong ? — A. To the whole church universal, and ever}"- particular member therein. — Ca. 1619. Q. How may Christ and his benefits be made ours ? — A. If we be made THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 1 3 one witli Christ, by the benefit of our union with Christ, we are made partakers of Christ and of all his benefits. Q. What are the means by which we are united to Christ spiritually ? — A. They are two : first, the Spirit of Christ, one and the same Spirit being both in Christ and in us, first in Christ, and then in us ; second, by faith, for faith also knits us to Christ, and by faith we receive Christ and his benefits ofi'ered unto us. — Ussher. Q. How is the grace of Christ effectually communicated unto the elect ? — A. By that wonderful union whereby Christ and his. church are made one, etc. Q. What is the bond of this union ? — A. The communion of God's Spirit . . . which giveth unto them spiritual life, and maketh them partakers of Christ with all his benefits. — Ussher' s Metliod. He being the power of God joineth me to God, and maketh me (and all God's elect) partakers of the mercy of the Father and the merits of the Son, — Egerton. See also Ball, p. 75, and Palmer, p. 114. Q. 31. Wliat is Effectual Calling ? A. Effectual Calling is the work of God's Spirit, whereby, convincing us of our sin and misery, inlightening our mindes in the knowledge of Christ, and renewing our wills, he doth per- suade and inable us to imbrace Jesus Christ, freely offered to us in the Gospel. Quest. 31. A worlc of God's Spirit in the hearts of his children whereby they are brought to the knowledge of their being in the covenant of grace, and of the number of such as shall be saved. — Whitaher. It is the work of the Spirit of regeneration, who by giving to the Elect a new heart and spirit, doth incline and enable them to follow the outward calling of the word, and to turne from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God. — Walker's Key of Knowledge. It is the open- ing of the understanding, ... it is the inclination of the will. . . , It is the rectifying of the affections. — Walker's Key. Q. What is the first benefit that we receive by this covenant of grace ? — A. Our calling is the first whereby we are brought out of darkness to light. — Ames. " Est autem haec vocatio quS, Deus electos in se adhuc miseros et corraptos extrinsecus verbo evangelii, intrinsecus autem mentis illumina- tione et cordis mutatione vocat ad participandum salutis gratiam." — Amesius. The applying of Christ is by an inward persuasion of the heart, a man being verily and particularly persuaded by the effectual persuasion of God's Spirit. — Elton. Q. Is this working of God only an offering of good things unto us ? — A. God doth not only offer grace unto us, but causeth us effectually to receive it, and therefore is said not only to draw us, but also to create a new heart in us, whereby we follow him, . . . first receiving from God the power to work, and then the will and the deed itself. By the urging of the law, the Spirit of God brings us unto the sight and feeling of sin with the misery following thereon, and withal humbles us, ... so forcing us to hunger and thirst after the true means of our salvation, God, out 14 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. of the gospel sheweth us the means of salvation in Jesus Christ, and worketh our hearts to embrace them with joy, yea, wholly to rest upon them. — Ecjerton and Elton ? Q. 32. JFhat benefits do they that are Effectually Called jpartake of in this life ? A. They that are Effectually Called do in this life partake of Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification, and the severall benefits which, in this life, do either accompany or flow [from] them. Quest. 32. Q. What are the benefits which arise to God's children by receiving Christ? — A. Reconciliation and sanctification. Q. What are the branches of reconciliation? — A. Justification and adoption. — Ussher's Method. Union with Christ, Justification, Reconciliation, Redemption, Adoption, and Sanctification. — Ca. of 1644. ^.33. What is Justification ? A. Justification is an act of God's free grace, wherein he pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in his sight, onely for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone. Quest. 33. God's gracious and just sentence pardoning and accepting for righteous every believing sinner by the imputation of Christ's righteous- ness. — Ca. of 1644. That grace whereby we are freed from the guilt of sin and accounted righteous in Christ Jesus our Redeemer. — Ussher^s Method. Only by the merits of Christ received of us by faith. — Ussher^s Method. It comprehendeth two things, the first to be cleared from the guiltiness and punishment of sin, the second to be accepted as perfectly righteous before God, ... by the righteousness of Christ imputed to him. — Perkins. Christ's making sinners accepted and perfectly righteous in God's sight, by his own righteousness, imputed and given unto them. — Egerton^s Form of Examining. Q. 34. PThat is Adoption ? A. Adoption is an act of God's free grace, whereby we are received into the number, and have a right to all the privileges, of the Sons of God. Quest. 34. That free enlarged act of God's love whereby he accepteth us ... to be his own sons and children. — Ca. of 1644. That grace whereby we are not only made friends with God, but also his sons and heirs with Christ. — Ussher^s Method. The power and 'privilege to he the ."ions of God. — Ussher's Body of Divinity, also Elton. It is the Father s making sinners sons and heirs of his kingdom in Christ. — Egertoii's Form THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 15 of Examining. They are made the children of God and heirs of eternal Glory, adopted into the number of his children. — Egerton's Brief Method. Q. 35. Wliat is Sandification ? A. Sanctification is the work of God's free grace, whereby we are renewed in the whole man after the Image of God, and are inabled more and more to die unto sin, and live unto righteous- ness. Quest. 35. A renewing of the ichole man to obey the word of God. — Whitaker. It is the renewing of our nature according to the image of God in righteousness and true holiness. . . . This renewing is of our whole nature, . . . but not wholly in this life, and is done by the power- ful operation of the Spirit of God. Q. "What be the parts of sanctifica- tion ? — A. Two : first, mortification or dying unto sin ; secondly, vivifica- tion or quickening unto newness of life. — Ussher's Body of Divinity. It is a making new of the whole man whereby he daily dieth to sin and increaseth in holiness and righteousness. — Bernard^s Short Catechism. ^.36. WTiat are the benefits which, in this life, do accompany or flow from justification, Adoption, and Sanctification ? A. The benefits which, in this life, do accompany or flow from Justification, Adoption, and Sanctification, are, assurance of God's love, peace of conscience, joy in the Holy Ghost, increase of grace, and perseverance therein to the end. Quest. 36. Experience of God's love in Christ, and so increase of peace of conscience and joy in the Holy Ghost. — Ussher^s Body of Divinity. Peace of conscience and joy in the Holy Ghost, with comfortable entrance ♦ unto the throne of grace. — Ames. AU good things temporal, growth and comfort of grace, perseverance to death. — Ca. of 1644. Peace of conscience, . . . victory over the world, . . . the Spirit of God bearing witness with their spirits that they be the children of God. Q. Do these witnesses never fail the faithful? — A. They may be overshadowed in them, . . . but never finally and whoUy taken away. — Egerton. The Ught of God's countenance, peace of conscience, joy unspeakable and glorious, confidence in prayer, patience in aflliction, and constancy in trial and temptation. — Hinde's Pathway. Q. 37. What benefits do Believers receive from Christ at death ? A. The souls of Believers are at their death made perfect in holiness, and do immediately pass into glory ; and their bodies, being still united to Christ, do rest in their graves till the Resurrection. Quest. 37. Death to true believers is ... a passage by which their souls enter immediately into heavenly glory. — Elton. My soul, then, 1 6 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. being freed from this body of sin, shall immediately be taken up into the paradise of God, there to live for ever with Jesus Christ. . . . My body, though it be laid for a time to rest in the grave, yet shall it one day be raised up, . . . and be joined to my soul to live together in ever- lasting glory. — Vesey. Q. 38. TFhat benefits do Believers receive from Christ at the Resurrection ? A. At the Resurrection, Believers being raised up in glory, shall be openly acknowledged and acquitted in the day of judgment, and made perfectly blessed in the full injoying of God to all eternity. Quest. 38. Q. The soul goeth immediately into the Paradise of God, and the body shall be raised up at the last day and joyned with the same in glory for ever.— Egertori's Brief Metliod. After the souls of God's elect be separated from their bodies, . . . they are in blisse with Christ in heaven, till at the generall day of resurrection they be joined again together to live and reign with Christ in all bliss and glory in the kingdom of heaven, for ever and ever. — Baker^s Short Catechism. Q. What will be the condition of the godly after this life, etc. ? — A. These having been kept here by the power of God through faith unto salvation, . . . are by Christ at his coming, . . . received into heaven, where is fulness of joy and pleasure for evermore. — Burtori's Grounds of Christian Religion. The elect shall be raised up as members of Christ's body, . . . their bodies glorious like unto the glorious body of Christ, . . . the elect shall be first acquitted, and by way of approbation shall join with Christ in judging of the reprobate, and then be brought into possession of life and glory in heaven, . . . eternal life and perfect glory. — Elton. And so we shall wholly be made perfectly and fully blessed, enjoying eternal life and felicity. — Noioell. Full immediate and everlasting conjunction with God in Christ. — White. Q. 39. JFhaf is the duty which God requireth of man ? A. The duty which God requireth of man, is Obedience to his revealed will. Quest. 39. Q. What obedience must we yield unto God, etc. ? — A. Such as the law of God requireth : the sum whereof are the ten command- ments. — John White. Q. 40. Wliat did God at first reveal to man for the Bute of his obedience ? A. The Rule which God at first revealed to man for his obedience, was the Moral Law. THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 1 7 ^.41. Where is the Moral Laiu summarily comprehended ? A. The Moral Law is summarily comprehended in the ten Commandments. Quests. 40, 41. Q. What rule have we for the direction of our obedience? — A. The moral law of God : the sum whereof is contained in the ten commandments. — Ussher^s Principles. Q. 42. What is the sum of tJie ten Comm/indments ? A. The sum of the ten Commandments is, To love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, with all our strength, and with all our minde ; and our Neighbour as our- selves. Quest. 42. Q. What is the sum and substance of the whole laws? — A. To love my God with all my soul, with all my heart, etc. — Galloway. Q. What is the sum of the first table ? — A. That we love the Lord our God with all our heart, with all our soul, and with all our mind. Q. What is the sum of the second table? — A. That we love our neigh- bours as ourselves. — Ussher's Principles. Q. 43. What is the Preface to the ten Commandments ? A. The Preface to the ten Commandments is in these words, / am the Lord thy God, ichich have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Quest. 43. In these words of God : " I am the Lord, thy God," etc. — Ussher. Q. 4:4:. What doth the preface to the ten Commandments teach us? A. The preface to the ten Commandments teacheth us. That because God is the Lord, and our God, and Eedeemer, therefore we are bound to keep all his Commandments. Quest. 44. That this law is to be obeyed because it proceed eth from him who is not only the Lord our Maker, but also our God and Saviour. — Ussher. Q. 4:b. Which is the first Commandment ? A. The first Commandment is, Thou shall have no other gods before me. Q. 46. TFliat is required in the first Commandment? A. The first Commandment require th us to know and acknowledge God to be the onely true God, and oui' God; and to worship and glorifie him accordingly. Quest. 46. That we take the true God only for our God by knowing and acknowledging him in our judgments to be God alone, and entirely 18 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. cleaving to him in our afifections. — Newcomen. Q. What doth the first commandment require ? — A. The choosing and haviog the true God to be our God. — Josias White. The inward worship of God, which especially consisteth in knowing, loving, fearing, and trusting in God with all our hearts. — John White. To make choice of one and the true God to be my God. — Bernard. That I do know, choose and affect, (jlorify and worship the one onely God for my God without any equal or partner. — Ca. of 1644. That we take the only true God for our God. — Gouge. Q. 47. fFhat is forbidden in the first Commandment? A. The first Commandment forbiddeth the denying, or not worshipping and glorifying the true God as God, and our God, and the giving [of] that worship and glory to any other, which is due to him alone. Quest. 47. To take that for God which is not God ... to deny God or his word, power, presence, justice or mercy openly or secretly in heart. — Bernard. See also Ball, p. 85, and Newcomen, p. 123. The neglect of the former duties, or the performance of them to any other save God alone. — White. Q. 48. What are ive specially taught by these words [before me] in the first Commandment ? A. These words [before we] in the first Commandment teach us, That God, who seeth all things, taketh notice of,' and is much displeased with, the sin of having any other God. Quest. 48. Q. What mean those last words before me ? — A. That we cannot once so much as tend to revolting from God, but that God is witness of it ; for there is nothing nor so secret that can be hid from him. — Nowell. This word noteth that inward worship whereof God alone doth take notice, and sheweth that he condemneth as well the corrupt thoughts of man's heart . . . as the wicked practice of the body. — Ussher. Q. 49. JVhich is the second Commandment ? A. The second Commandment is, Thou shall not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth ; thou shall not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them : For I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them, that hate me ; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my Commandments. Q. 50. What is required in the second Commandment 1 A. The second Commandment require th the receiving, observ- THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 1 9 ing, and keeping pure and intire, all such religious Worship and Ordinances as God hath appointed in his word. Quest. 50. Sucli outward worship of God as himself hath appointed, especially the preaching and hearing of his word, prayer, and receiving the sacraments. — White. To worship God according to his word. — Twisse. That I neither worship God after my own or others' will and fancy, but keep close to his pure appointed worship. — Ca. of 1644. The worship- ping of God spiritually and purely according to his own directions in his word. — Newcomen, ^.51. TVIiat is forbidden in the second Commandment ? A. The second Commandment forbiddeth the worshipping of God by images, or any other way, not appointed in his word. Quest. 51. The worshipping of God by images . . . and obtruding upon God any human inventions as parts of his worship. — Kewcomen. The neglect of the former duties ; all worship of man's devising, especially the having or making of an image to a religious use. — White. To worship God after our own wits and wills. — Twisse. Q. 52. UHiat are the reasons annexed to the second Command- ment ? A. The reasons annexed to the second Commandment are, God's sovereignty over us, his propriety in us, and the zeal he hath to his own Worship. Quest. 52. They are taken partly from his titles and partly from his works ; the first in these words, " For I the Lord thy God am a jealous God ;" the second in these words, " Visiting the iniquities," etc. — Ussher. Q. 53. Which is the third Commandment? A. The third Commandment is, Thou shalt not take the name of tJie Lord thy God in vain : For the Lord ivill not hold him guilt- less that taketh his name in vain. Q. 54. Wliat is required in the third Commandment ? A. The third Commandment requireth the holy and reverent use of God's Names, Titles, Attributes, Ordinances, Word, and Works. Quest. 54. That we use the name of God, that is, his titles, properties, works, and ordinances w^ith due reverence. — Newcomen. That we think and speak of the titles, properties, word and works of God with all rever- ence, that we credit our profession by a godly life, and that we use an oath of God religiously when it is lawfully required. — White. That we use the name of God (that is, his titles, word, works, judgments, and 20 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. whatsoever he luould have himself known by) with reverence and all lioly respect, that in all things he may have his dne glory given nnto hirn. — llssher''s Principles. The reverent using of whatsoever belongeth to God, and to these ends only which he hath allowed. — Palmer. The right using of God's titles, word, and works. — Whitaker. Reverent estimation and use of the name of God both in heart, word, and deed. — Wilkinson. Q. 55. TFhat is forbidden in the third Commandment ? A. The third Commandment forbiddeth all profaning or abusing of any thing whereby God makes himself known. Quest. 55. The light or rash use of his Word, Worship, Works, Attri- butes and Titles. — Ca. of 1644. The dishonouring of God by a wicked life, the idle or blasphemous use of God's name in thought or word, but especially in an oath. — White. May we profane any of them ? or abuse them to ill ends ? or neglect God's ends in using them? — Palmer. Q. 56. TFhat is the reason annexed to the third Commandment ? A. The reason annexed to the third Commandment is, That however the breakers of this Commandment may escape punish- ment from men, yet the Lord our God will not suffer them to escape his righteous judgment. Quest. 56. That howsoever man's law take not hold of offenders in this kind, yet God will not acquit them nor suffer them to escape his righteous and fearful judgments. — tlsslier. That God will severely punish such as are rash and common swearers. — Wehh. Q. 57. JVliich is the fourth Commandment ? A. The fourth Commandment is, Remember the Sabbath-day, to keep it holy : Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy man- servant, nor thy maid-servant, nor thy cattel, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates : For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day : where- fore the Lord blessed the Sabbath-day, and halloived it. Q. 5 8. TFhat is required in the fourth Commandment ? A. The fourth Commandment requireth the keeping holy to God such set time ^ as he hath appointed in his word, expressly one whole day in seven, to be a holy Sabbath to himself Quest. 58. To set apart and employ one day in seven, and now specially the Lord's day, in the duties of religion and works of mercy. — Newcomen. 1 Sic, not times. THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 21 It challengetli at the hand of every man one day of seven in every week to be set apart unto a holy rest. — Ussher^s Body of Divinity. That we keep holy the Sabbath-day, by resting from the ordinary businesses of life, and bestowing that leisure upon the exercises of religion, both public and private. — Usslier's Principles. The solemn times of worship, necessary to religion at God's only appointment, and chiefly a standing day in the week, of rest from worldly business to attend on God. — Palmer. The sanctifying of the day of rest, appointed by God for his public service, by ceasing from all worldly labours and cares, and employing the time, publicly and privatelj'-, in all manner of religious exercises. — White. Q. 59. Which day of the seven hath God appointed to he the iveekly Sahhath ? A. From the beginning of the wodd to the resurrection of Christ, God appointed the seventh day of the week to be the weekly Sabbath ; and the first day of the week ever since, to continue to the end of the world, which is the Christian Sabbath. Quest. 59. Q. What is the special day of the week which God hath set apart for his solemn worship? — A. The first day of the week, called the Lord's Day. Q. Was the day set apart thereunto from the beginning ? — A. No ; for from the first creation till the resurrection of Christ, the last day of the week . . . was the day that was appointed thereunto. Q. How came this day to be changed ? — A. By Divine authority. Q. What was the cause why the day was changed ? — A. That it might serve for a thankful memorial of Christ's resurrection. Q. Can this day then be altered ? — A. No power of any creatui'e in heaven or earth can alter it. — Ussher. From the creation to the resurrection of Christ the seventh day was instituted ; after Christ's resurrection the first day of the week was ordained to be kept for ever. — Ball. Q. 60. How is the Sabbath to be sanctified ? A. The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy resting all that day, even from such worldly imployments and recreations as are lawfull on other daies,, and spending the whole time in the publick and private exercises of God's worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy. Quest. 60. That I keep that day holy — first, by abstaining from all bodily labours more than such as either charity, necessity, or religion require to be done ; and secondly, spend the day in hearing and learning the Word of God . . . and such like exercises of religion. — Vesey. It is not sufficient that we rest from ivorldly businesses, but it is farther required that it be a holy rest [declining] not only the works of sin which we ought to leave undone every day, but also works of our ordiuary callings . . . 22 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. and bodily exercise and labours which upon other days are lawful, and . . . that Math care and desire of profit we bestow the whole day (as nature will bear) in holy exercises. — Ussher. First, to rise early in the morning to prepare ourselves to the works of the Sabbath ; secondly, to be present at public assemblies in the church ; thirdly, to spend the rest of the day in the meditation of his word and creatures. — AttersoLL Q. May no works of this life be done on the Sabbath-day ? — A. Yes, the works of nature, of civility, of piety, of charity, and of necessity. Q. How must men spend this day ? — A. Not in idleness, but in keeping holy unto the Lord. Q. What works of holiness must men do upon this day ? — A. All sorts of works, both public and private. — Wehh. Q. 61. What is forbidden in the fourth Commandment ? A. The fourth Commandment forbiddeth the omission or careless performance of the duties required, and the profaning the day by idleness, or doing that which is in itself sinfull, or by unnecessary thoughts, words, or works, about [our] worldly imployments or recreations. Quest. 61. The neglect of the former duties, and profaning of the Lord's day by idleness, sports, labours, or wicked actions. — White. The unhallowing or profaning of the Sabbath either by doing the works of our calling ... or by leaving undone the works of the Spirit . . . talking of our worldly affairs, thinking our own thoughts, or making it a day of carnal rest unto idleness, pastimes, etc. — Ussher. Either by omitting any of the forementioned duties by which the Sabbath is to be sanctified, or by doing any work whereby it may be profaned. — Newcomen, Also Ball. Q. 62. What are the reasons annexed to the fourth Command- ment ? A. The reasons annexed to the fourth Commandment are, God's allowing us six dayes of the week for our own imploy- ments, his challenging a speciall propriety in the seventh, his own example, and his blessing the Sabbath-day. Quest. 62. Four in number : L Because he doth allow them six days in every week to do their own business in ; 2. because the seventh day is the Lord's day, and not theirs ; 3. because he himself rested the seventh day and did not work therein, as he had done in the six days before ; 4. because he hath sanctified the seventh day, and appointed the same for a blessing to men. — Webb. See also Ussher. Q. 63. Which is the fifth Commandment ? A. The fifth Commandment is. Honor thy father and thy mother : that thy days may be long uiJon the land which the Lord thy God (jiveth thee. THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 23 ^.64. What is required in the fifth Commandment ? A. The fifth Commandment requireth the preserving the honour, and performing the duties, belonging to every one in their severall places and relations, as Superiors, Inferiors, or Equals. Quest. 64. That we carry ourselves as becomes us in our places, and give unto others the honour and respect that is due unto them in regard of their places and degrees, as they are our superiors, inferiors, or equals. — Newcomen. Such duties as are to be performed with a special respect of superiors, inferiors, and equals. — Usshers Principles. To preserve the dignity of every one by all means, that is in any way to be preferred either by his place, age, or gifts, — Bernard. A faithful discharging of all such duties as we owe one to the other by any particular bond, whether they be suj)eriors, inferiors, or equals. — Webh. That due respect, which ought to be between man and man, in regard of their several callings and gifts. — Wilkinson. See also Ball, p. 86. ^.65. Wliat is forbidden in the fifth Commandment ? A. The fifth Commandment forbiddeth the neglecting of, or doing anything against, the honour and duty which belongeth to every one in their severall places and relations. Quest. 65. The neglect or omission of any of the duties before mentioned, or the doing of anything contrary thereunto. — Newcomen. All neglect or contempt of special duties which one man doth owe to another. — Webh. In inferiors unthankfulness, hatred, disobedience, and contempt of superiors in thought, word, or action. In superiors evil and light behaviour, want of love and diligence in instructing and guiding those that are under them. — White. Q. ^Q. What is the reason annexed to the fifth Commandment ? A. The reason annexed to the fifth Commandment, is a promise of a long life and prosperity (as far as it shall serve for G-od's glory and their own good) to all such as keep this Commandment. Quest. 66. Q. What is the sanction of this commandment? — A. That thy days may be long, etc. Q. Have all the children of God length of life? — A. They have two manner of ways: 1. ... in this world . . . so far forth as all states and conditions work for their good ; 2. . . . in the kingdom of heaven, of which, indeed, the land of Canaan was a figure. — Twisse. The blessing of long life and prosperity to such as by keeping this Commandment shall show that they regard the image and ordinance of God ... so far forth as it is good for us, and therefore the 24r THE SHORTER CATECHISM. godly are sure to live, so long as it shall serve for God's glory and for their own good. — Ussher. Q. 67. Which is the sixth Commandment ? A. The sixth Commandment is, Thou shalt not kill. Q. 68. JVhat is required in the sixth Commandment ? A. The sixth Commandment requireth all lawfull endeavours to preserve our own life, and the life of others. Quest. 68. That we do what in us lieth to further the j^'t'^servation of life ... in ourselves and others. — Newcomen. The preservation of the safety of men's persons, with all means tending to the same. . , . — Ussher^ s Principles. Love of our neighbour's person . . . and the careful use of all means to preserve his soul and body. — White. To speak nothing but good unto him, to do him all the good we can, — Twisse. Not to hurt or hinder either mine own life or my neighbour's, but by all means preserve the same. — Bernard. The preserving of men's persons and lives and souls in all safety. — Palmer. The preservation of man's person from the malice of the heart, the injury of the tongue, and the violence of the hand. — Wilkinson. ^.69. What is forbidden in the sixth Commandment ? A. The sixth Commandment forbiddeth the taking away of our own life, or the life of our neighbour unjustly ; and whatso- ever tendeth thereunto. Quest. 69. All murdering and hurt of man's person either in soul or body. — Webb. Unadvised anger, hatred, outward violence to our brother's person, all speeches and behaviour that may provoke any of them, oppression, withholding of necessary relief, neglect of our brother's soul or body. — White. The doing, intending, or wishing any hurt to the souls or bodies of ourselves or others. — Newcomen. Q. 70. Which is the seventh Commandment ? A. The seventh Commandment is. Thou shalt not commit adultery. Q. 11. What is required in the seventh Commandment ? A. The seventh Commandment requireth the preservation of our own and our neighbour's chastity, in heart, speech, and behaviour. Quest. 71. The preservation of chastity and purity both in body and mind. — Newcomen. The preservation of chastity in myself and in my neighbour. — Wilkinson. The preservation of the chastity of men's / THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 25 persons. — Ussher's Principles. To live chastely and soberly in thought, word, deed, and behaviour. — New Catechism (Scotch). Modesty in apparel, words, and behaviour ; sobriety in meats and drinks, chastity in every part of soul and body. — White. To preserve chastity, and not any way hurt or impair the honesty of thy neighbour. — Bernard. The maintaining of chastity in aU ... in heart and words as well as behaviour. — Palmer. Q. 12. Wlioi is forbidden in the seventh Commandment ? A. The seventh Commandment forbiddeth all unchaste thoughts, words, and actions. Quest. 72. All manner of inordinacie in thought, desire, speech, or action. — Neiccomen. The defiling of the soul or body with the unclean- ness of the flesh, and all words or actions that may give occasion there- unto. — White. All uncleanness in our thoughts, words, deeds, and behaviour. — Xew Catechism. See also Ball, p. ST. Q. 73. JFTiich is the eighth Commandment? A. The eighth Commandment is, Tlwu shalt not steal. Q. 74. JVhat is required in the eighth Commandment ? A. The eighth Commandment requireth the lawfull procuring and furthering the wealth and outward estate of ourselves and others. Quest. 74. That we do what in us lieth by all good and laicful means to further the wealth or outward estate of ourselves and others. — Newcomen. That we should not impair our own or our neighbour's estate, but as far as we can procure the good of both. — Wilkinson. To preserve equity, and not any way hinder or diminish thy neighbour's estate, bat by all means preserve and increase the same. — Bernard. The preservation of our neighbour's goods, justice in all our dealings, contentedness with oiu- estate, frugality and labour in an honest calling. — White. In regard of ourselves that we labour diligently in an honest and profitable calling, and content ourselves with the goods well gotten . . . ; in regard of our neighbours, that we use all good means that may tend to the furtherance of their estate. — Ussher's Princijjles. Q. 7o. TFhat is forbidden in the eighth Commandment ? A. The eighth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever doth or may unjustly hinder our own or our neighbour's wealth or outward estate. Quest. 75. The doing or endeavouring to do anything that may hinder or impair the outward estate of ourselves or others. — Neiccomen. The greedy desire of riches, especially of other men's goods, idleness, unlawful 26 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. callings, deceitful bargaining, oppression, the unlawful getting or with- holding of any goods publick or private. — White. See also Ball, p. 87 Q. 76. Which is the ninth Commandment? A. The ninth Commandment is, Thou shall not hear false tuitness against thy neighbour. Q. 77. What is required in the ninth Commandment ? A. The ninth Commandment requireth the maintaining and promoting of truth between man and man, and of our own and our neighbour's good name, especially in witness-bearing. Quest. 77. The maintaining and upholding of the truth and withal of the good name or credit of ourselves and others. — Newcomen. Ball, p, 87. The using of truth in our dealing one tvith another; especially in the jyreservation of the good name of our neighbours. — Ussher's Principles. Truth and plain dealing. — Tivisse. To speak and maintain the truth, to perform our promises, to judge uprightly of ourselves and others, to speak sparingly of their faults, and to stand to their credit against slanderous tongues. — White. That I both think well of him so far as the truth shall suffer me, and also preserve his credit and good name so far as I am able. — Vesey. To preserve verity and not diminish the good name or credit of my neighbour. — Bernard. The maintaining of truth and the preserv- ing of men's good name. — Palmer. That our own and our neighbour's credit and good name should be preserved. — Wilkinson. Q. 78. What is forbidden in the ninth Commandment ? A. The ninth Commandment forbiddeth whatsoever is pre- judiciall to truth, or injurious to our own or our neighbour's good name. Quest. 78. Thinking, speaking, or doing anything against the truth or to the prejudice of our own or our neighbour's good name. — Newcomen. All lying and betraying of the truth, breach of promise, false witnessing and judging, proud thoughts and boasting of ourselves, inventing and entertaining causeless suspicions, and false reports of others, or rejoicing in their disgrace. — White. Q. 7^. Which is the tenth Commandment? A. The tenth Commandment is, Thou shall not covet thy neigh- hour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbours wife, nor his man- servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour s. Q. 80. What is required in the tenth Commandment ? A. The tenth Commandment requireth full contentment with THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 27 our OAvn condition, with a right and charitable frame of spirit toward our neighbour, and all that is his. Quest. 80. That vre be truly contented loith our own outward estate and condition, and heartily desire and rejoice in the good estate of our neigh- bours. — Neiocomen. A pure heart and holy thoughts and motions of the heart. — White. To labour for contentment, and that I may not have once an unlawful lust to that which is my neighbour's, but for ever think good towards him. — Bernard. Conteutedness with what is our own, and rejoycing in another's good as in our own. — Palmer. Also Ball. ^.81. JFhat is forbidden in the tenth Commandment ? A. The tenth Commandment forbiddeth all discontentment with our own estate, envying or grieving at the good of our neighbour, and all inordinate motions and affections to any thing that is his. f. 81. The least lusting of the heart contrary to true contentment with my own, and rejoicing in another's good. — Ca. of 1644. All wandering thoughts that disagree from the love which we owe unto our neighbours; although we never yield consent thereunto. — Ussher's Principles. The least motions and inclinations to the contrary. — Palmer. The originall corruption of the heart and all sinfull motions proceeding from it, though we consent not to them. — White. Lust and sudden mo- tions against our neighbour without consent. — Bernard. All motions and inclinations and concupiscences whatsoever, . . . though passing without consent of heart, whether concerning our neighbour's person or state any way. — Wilkinson. All inordinate motions of but wishing any thing which is not our own. — Whitaker. All kind of discontented thoughts about our own present condition, together with all inordinate desires, wishes, or longings after that which is not . . . envying at the prosperity or happi- ness of others, together with all rejoicing in their hurt. — Newcomen. Q. 82. Is any man able ])erfecthj to keep the Commandments of God ? A. Xo meer man since the fall is able, in this life, perfectly to keep the Commandments of God, but doth^ daily break them in thought, word, and deed. Quest. 82. Q. Is any man able to keep this law ? — A. No man is able in this life perfectly to observe what God's law requireth. — Ames. Q. Can you keep all these Commandments ? — A. No ; I break them daily in thought, word, and deed. — Egerton, p. 35. No ; we break every Com- mandment thereof daily in thought, word, and deed. — White's Sltort Catechism. No ; for the best man that is doth sin and break it daily. — 1 Ed. 164S omits doth, and for break reads breaks. 28 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. WebVs Key of Knowledge. Neither can I nor any man else, but whoso- ever doth his best offendeth against them every day, first in thought, secondly in word, and thirdly in deed. — Vesey. Q. 83. Are all transgressions of the Law equally heinous ? A. Some sins in themselves, and by reason of severall aggra- vations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others. Quest. 83. Q. Are all sins of knowledge equal? — A. No, some are of infirmity, and some of presumption, . . . some are only sins, but others are wickednesses, and some beastliness or devilishness. — Ames. Q. What be the difi"erences of sins actually committed? — A. They are many, but especially these : 1. A partaking with others in sin by consent, appro- bation, counsel, presence, enticement, or the like ; 2. A sinning ignorantly of a conscience misinformed ; 3. A sinning of knowledge through infirmity ; 4. A sinning presumptuously with knowledge ; 5. A sinning upon know- ledge obstinately, and out of malice against God. — Elton. Q. 84. Wliat doth every sin deserve ? A. Every sin deserveth God's wrath and curse, both in this life, and that which is to come. Quest. 84. The wrath and curse of God, that is, all plagues and judg- ments of body and soul in this world and in the world to come. — Parr. The wages of sin is death, . . . and the curse and wrath of God to the uttermost both in this life and in the next. — Wilkinson. Q. What do man's sins deserve ? A. The curse of God, with all the miseries of this life and the punishment of hell fire ever after. — Egerton. Even first all temporal crosses and calamities of this life present . . . and eternal damnation both of body and soul after this life. — Vesey. The infinite wrath of God, and his vengeance for ever in this world and in the world to come, is due for the least sin. — Bernard. Q. 85. What doth God require of us, that lue may escape his vrath and curse due to us for sin ? A. To escape the wrath and curse of God due to us for sin, God requireth of us Faith in Jesus Christ, Kepentance unto life, with the diligent use of all the outward means whereby Christ communicateth to us the benefits of Redemption. Quest. 85. Q. By what means shall I escape death ? A. By faith in Christ. — Paget. Q. How must you esca]ie this vengeance of God ? A. Only by faith in Jesus Christ, whose is the merit only and wholly of my salvation. — Bernard. Q. 86. JVhat is Faith in Jesus Christ ? A. Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving grace, whereby we THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 29 receive, and rest upon him alone for salvation, as he is offered to us in the Gospel. Quest. 86. It is a resting upon Christ alone for pardon of sin and eternal salvation. — Brinsley's Ca. Faith is a saving grace whereby we go out of ourselves and rest upon Christ alone for salvation. — Geree. A lively belief of the gospel whereby Christ (offered) is received and rested upon for salvation. — Ca. of 1644. A grace whereby we receive Christ as our perfect Saviour, and rest upon him alone for salvation. — Ca. 1646. In our vocation we receive Christ, and rest upon him as offered. — Ames. By faith we receive Christ and his benefits offered unto us. — Elton. Faith is a wonderful grace of God by which a man doth apprehend and apply Christ and all his benefits unto himself. — Perkins, also Elton. A full persuasion and steadfast assurance. — Paget. A constant relying only upon the mercy of God in Christ Jesus for everlasting salvation. — Baker\'i Short Catechism. It is a belief of the gospel, whereby a sinner, truly humbled for sin, doth trust and rest upon Christ alone for salvation — Llittletonl ? — Help for young people. A resting upon Christ alone for salvation. — Ball. True faith in Christ is to rest in him alone for pardon . . . and then for aU grace and salvation. — Palmer. See for t/'ss/ter, p. 13. Q. 87. ^hat is Repentance unto life ? A. Repentance unto life is a saving grace, whereby a sinner, out of a true sense of his sin, and apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ, doth, with grief and hatred of his sin, turn from it unto God, with full purpose of, and endeavor after, new obedience. Quest. 87. A gift of God whereby a godly son-ow is wrought in the heart of the faithful for offending God the merciful Father, . . . together with a resolution for the time to come to forsake their former courses and lead a new life. — Ussher's Principles. A godly sorrow for sin wrought in the heart by the Spirit of God. — Baker's Short Catechism. It is a true turning of my mind, will, and heart wholly from the world, the flesh and the devil unto God withfidl purpose to attend carefully to the counsel of his word and Spirit, and through the whole course of my life readily and constantly endeavour to follow the same. — Bernard. Q. What are the parts of repentance ? A, Two : first, a forsaking of our sin with an hatred and sorrow for it ; secondly, a betaking of ourselves unto righteous- ness with a love and liking of it. — Attersoll. A turning from sin unto God, a change of the purpose of the heart and course of life. — Elton. Q. Whence Cometh this change ? A. Especially from the sight and feeling of God's mercy towards us in Christ. — Egerton. Q. 88. Wliat are the outward means whereby Christ communi- cateth to us the benefits of Redemption ? A. The outward and ordinary means whereby Christ com- 30 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. inunicatetli to us the benefits of Eedemption, are his Ordinances, especially the Word, Sacraments, and Prayer; all which are made efFectuall to the Elect for salvation. Quest. 88. The ordinary outward means for this are, first, diligent hear- ing of the word ; secondly, often use of the sacraments ; and thirdly, frequent prayer. — Vesey. The preaching of the word, prayer, and the sacraments. — Attersoll. Q. What are the ordinances of God, etc. t A. Chiefly five : 1. The word preached ; 2. The administration of the sacra- ments ; 3. Prayer; 4. Discipline; Lastly, Christian communion. — Peters. His Word, Sacraments, Prayer, and Discipline. — Ca. of 1644. Q. 89. How is the Word made effectual to salvation ? A. The Spirit of God maketh the Reading, but especially the Preaching of the Word, an effectuall means of convincing and converting sinners, and of building them up in holiness and comfort, through faith, unto salvation. Quest. 89. By the powerful preaching of the gospel and effectual work- ing of the Spirit by the same. — Hinde. Q. What say you of the word read ? A. It is a part of God's ordinance, but much more efi'ectual when it is preached. — Egerton. Q. What need is there of hearing the word l)reached, seeing we may read it? A. Because it is the ordinance of God and his power unto salvation ... it serves — 1. To breed faith in their hearts ; and 2. then to increase it. — Elton. So also Newcomen. Q. 90. How is the Word to be read and heard, that it may become effectuall to salvation ? A. That the Word may become effectuall to salvation, we must attend thereunto with diligence, preparation, and prayer, receive it with faith and love, lay it up in our hearts, and practise it in our lives. Quest. 90. He must attend to it with meekness and reverence, meditate and confer on it after he hath heard it, and above all, put in practice what is taught therein. — Newcortien. Q. How may we profit by the word preached ? A. If being persuaded that it is God's ordinance, we come with prayer, hear with attention and application, and after call to mind what we have heard to put in practice. — Egerton' s Brief Method. We must come to it with hunger-bitten hearts, having an appetite to the word. We must mark it with attention, receive it with faith, sub- mit ourselves unto it with fear and trembling, even then when our faults are reproved. Lastly, we must hide it in our hearts that we may frame our lives and conversations by it. — Perkins, also Elton. We must pray to the Lord for a blessing . . . attend to the things that are taught us . . . lay them up in our hearts, and obey and practise them in our lives. — Vesey. See also Ball, p, 75. THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 31 Q. 91. How do the Sacraments become effectuall means of sal- vation ? A. The Sacraments become effectuall means of salvation, not from any virtue in them, or in him that doth administer them ; but onely by the blessing of Christ, and the working of his Spirit in them that by faith receive them. Quest. 91. Not as having grace infolded in them, but God by his wonderful power gives it and confirms it unto us by the sacraments. — Bernard's Short Grounds. They neither of themselves, nor in themselves, include or give grace, for that is the gift of the Holy Ghost, but they be holy signes whereby as by an instrument God doth work and seal grace in my heart by faith received. — Shutte's Compendious Form. They neither work grace eflfectually of themselves, nor are they bare signs, but . . . means ordained of Christ to confirm to the faithful receiver the things signified, not of themselves, but by virtue of Christ's institution. — Burton's Grounds of Christian Religion. The minister only dispenseth the signs, but it is God that giveth and dispenseth the things signified. — Ussher. Q. 92. What is a Sacrament ? A. A Sacrament is an holy Ordinance instituted by Christ, wherein, by sensible signs, Christ, and the benefits of the New Covenant, are represented, sealed, and applied to Believers. Q. 9 3. Which are the Sacraments of tJie New Testament ? A. The Sacraments of the New Testament are. Baptism, and the Lord's supper. Quest. 92 and 93. It is an holy ordinance of God, which he hath appointed to be used in his church . . . whereby Christ and his benefits are, by such outward rites as he hath prescribed, signified, exhibited, and sealed to them. — Elton. A sacrament is an holy action ordained by Christ in his church, wherein under certain visible signs, Christ, with all his benefits, is signed, sealed, and conveyed unto the true believer. — Whitens Short Catechisme. Wherein by visible signs the promises of the covenant are represented, exhibited, sealed, and applied to us. — Ames. A visible sign ordained by Christ to signify, seal, and exhibit the invisible graces promised to his elect in the Gospel. — Baker's Catechism. A signe to represent, a scale to confirm, and an instrument to convey Christ and all his benefits to them that do believe in him. — Perkins. Un segno esterior sensibile che significa la gratia a gustificatione gia detta per institutione di Christo. — Gagliardi. A sensible signe and seale of God's favour offered and given to us. — Craig. Q. What are the Sacraments ordained by Christ in the New Testament ? — A. Baptism and the Lord's Supper. — Ussher. 32 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Q. 94. IFhat is Baptism? A. Baptism is a Sacrament, wherein the washing with water in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, doth signifie and seal our ingrafting into Christ, and partaking of the benefits of the Covenant of Grace, and our ingagement to be the Lord's. Quefit. 94. Q. What is baptism? — A. It is a Scacrament of the New- Testament, wherein, by the minister's once washing with w^ater in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, is represented and sealed to the right receiver, the powerful washing of the blood of Christ, and of the Spirit of Christ, and to his ingrafting into Christ, his new birth, and his entrance into the covenant of grace. — Elton; also Ussher. Our spiritual ingrafting into Christ, etc. — White, and also Ball. Q. What is signified by that oflfering and giving the body to be washed with the water of baptism ? — A. The consecrating and giving himself to the Lord. — Elton. Q. 95. To whom is Ba])tisin to he administered ? A. Baptism is not to be administered to any that are out of the Visible Church, till they profess their faith in Christ, and obedience to him ; but the infants of such as are members of the Visible Church are to be baptized. Quest. 95. Q. Who are to be admitted to the Sacrament of Baptism ? — A. All such as be in the covenant in likelihood or in the judgment of charity. Q. Who be those? — A. Either persons of riper years that join themselves to the true church of God and make profession of the true faith of Christ, or irfants horn of Christian parents; for infants of believing parents are within the covenant of grace. — Elton. Not only such as be of years that can and do testify their faith, but also infants of either father or mother professing Christ and baptized ; for the promise of salvation belongs to them and to their children. — Bernard ; see also Gouge and Ball. ^.96. What is the Lord's Supper ? A. The Lord's Supper is a Sacrament, wherein, by giving and receiving bread and wine, according to Christ's appoint- ment, his death is shewed forth ; and the worthy receivers are, not after a corporall and carnall manner, but hj faith, made partakers of his Body and blood, with all his benefits, to their spirituall nourishment, and growth in grace. QueM. 96. It is the second sacrament, wherein, hy the visible receiving of bread and wine, is represented our spiritual communion with the body THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 33 and blood of Christ, . . Its uses are to sheiv forth the death and suflFerings of Christ, etc. — AttersoU. It is the second sacrament of tbe New Testament, wherein God . . . signifieth, sealeth, and exhibiteth to every faithful receiver the body and blood of Christ for his spiritual nourish- ment and growth in Christ. — Ussher^s Body of Divinity. See also Newcomen. It is also a sacrament of the New Testament, wherein, by the minister's blessing and delivering of bread and wine, according to the institution of Christ, is signified, exhibited, and sealed to the right receiver the nourishment of the soule to eternall life by the body and blood of Jesus Christ crucified, and to his further growth in grace, and his further confirmation in the Covenant of grace. — Elton. Q. What is offered unto you in the Lord's Supper hy giving and receiving bread and wine ? — A. Christ Jesus and him crucified, with all the benefits of his death and passion. — Hinde's Pathway to Piety. Even as the minister by the reverent use of the word ofi"ereth bread and wine to the communicants to feed thereupon bodily, so God the Father, by the powerful work of the Spirit, oflfereth and giveth the body and blood of Christ, with all the benefits of his sufferings, unto the faithful . . . for our communion and growth in Christ. — AttersoU. Though Christ his body and blood be truly given and received in the Sacrament, yet they are not given and received corporally, but spiritually and sacramentally. — Elton. By faith after a spiritual, not after a carnal, manner. — Wilkinson. Received of us by faith for the nourishing of our souls unto eternal life. — Newcomen. Q. 97. JFliat is required to the ivoiihy receiving of the Lord's Sapper ? A. It is required of them that v\^ould worthily partake of the Lord's Supper, that they examine themselves of their Know- ledge to discern the Lord's body, of their Faith to feed upon him, of their Eepentance, Love, and New Obedience; lest, coming unworthily, they eat and drink judgment to themselves. 97. Q. How many things are required to prepare us to the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper? — A, Four. Q. What are the two first? — A. Knowledge and faith. Q. What are the two last? — A. Repentance and love. — Tivisse. They are six in number : — 1. An holy desire of the sacrament and cheerful coming to it ; 2. a measure of sound knowledge, touching the things and actions in the sacrament, and the use of them ; 3. a true and lively faith in Jesus Christ crucified ; 4. true and unfeigned repentance ; 5. an unfeigned and godly purpose of amendment of life ; 6. a love to God for his mercy in the great work of our redemption, and a love to all that bear the image of God. — Elton. Q. What is the danger of unworthy receiving ? — A. Unworthy receivers are guilty of the body and blood of the Lord, and so doe eat and drink judgment unto themselves. — Ball. He becomes guilty of the body and blood \ of Christ, and so eateth and drinketh judgment unto himself. — Newcomen. C 34 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Q. 98. What is Prayer? A. Prayer is an offering up of our desires to God for things agreeable to his will, in the name of Christ, with confession of our sins, and thankfull acknowledgment of his mercies. Quest. 98. Prayer is the Hfting up of my heart to God, and asking hi Christ^ s name of things needful to me and the whole church, with thanks- giving for his benefits. — Shutte. It is a right request made only to God, hi the name of Jesus Christ, by a true believer, for such things as be lawful. — Bernard. Prayer is an humble, hearty, and holy request, made according to God's will, and offered up by faith to God, in the name of Christ, for things need full either for body or soule. — Elton. It is a religious calling upon God alone, in the name of Christ, craving the things we want, and giving thanks for those we have. — Egerton^s Brief Method. Not the calling of the tongue, but the cry of the heart. — Hinde. Q. What are the parts thereof ? — A. Two principally ; petition or request, whereby we crave things needful, and thanksgiving or praise, whereby we give thanks for benefits received, to both which is annexed confession of sins. — Ussher^s Body of Divinity. Q. 99. What rule hath God given for our direction in Prayer? A. The whole word of God is of use to direct us in Prayer ; but the special rule of direction is that form of Prayer which Christ taught his disciples, commonly called The Lord's Prayer. Quest. 99. Generally the word of God, more specially the forme of prayer which Christ hath taught us, which we commonly call The Lord's Prayer. — Newcomen. The same which our Saviour Christ taught his dis- ciples, called The Lord's Prayer. — Bernard. The general direction is the word of God, the more special is The Lord's Prayer. — Ball. The Scrip- tures, and chiefly The Loi-d's Prayer. — Craig. Q. Have you any sound pattern of holy prayer? — A, There be many in the Scriptures, but none comparable to the Lord's prayer for a perfect pattern and full direction to pray by. — Egerton's Form of Examining, p. 33. Q. How must we pray? — A. As we are directed in God's word, but especially by Christ in that form which we call the Lord's prayer. — White. Q. 100. What doth the -preface of the Lord's Prayer teach us ? A. The preface of the Lord's Prayer, (which is, Our Father which art in Heaven,) teacheth us to draw near to God with all holy reverence and confidence, as children to a father, able and ready to help us ; and that we should pray with and for others. Quest. 100. To pray with reverence to his glorious and heavenly majesty, and yet with confidence in his Almighty power. — Newcomen. To come unto God with confidence and boldness as to a father, and yet THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 35 with reverence of his Majesty as being in heaven. — Brinsley. To direct our prayers to God only . . . who is a Father, and therefore willing, a heavenly Father, and therefore able to help us in all our necessities. — Wilkinson. It implies, first, that we may go boldly to him ... as children to their dear and loving Father ; secondly, that he beareth a fatherly affection towards us, and is ready and willing to hear and grant our lawful requests. — V^esey. Q. 101. What do tve pray for in the first Petition ? A. In the first Petition, (which is, Hallowed he thy name) we pray, That God would enable us and others to glorifie him in all that whereby he maketh himself known, and that he would dispose all things to his own glory. Quest. 101. What meane you here by the name of God? Whatsoever God makes himself known or remembered by. What is it then you ask in this petition ? That God's glorious excellency may be more and more . . . set forth and advanced by us in and above all things. — Neiccomen. That God may be glorified and magnified by us and by all other creatures. — Brinsley. That God's name may be sanctified, that is his divine attri- butes be acknowledged, admired, and celebrated, wheresoever they appear in his word and works. — Josias White. To this end, that knowing him to be a God that delighteth in holiness, we might thereby be moved to refer all things to the glory of his holy name. — Twisse. Q. 102. What do we pray for in the second Petition ? A. In the second Petition, (which is, Thy kingdom come) we pray. That Satan's kingdom may be destroyed ; and that the Kingdom of Grace may be advanced, ourselves and others brought into it, and kept in i^; and that the Kingdom of Glory may be hastened. Quest. 102. First, that Satan's tyranny may be abolished ; second, that the word of God may be gloriously advanced everywhere, . . . last, that he would be pleased to finish the kingdom of grace, and to hasten the kingdom of glory. — Neiccomen. That God, throwing down the kingdom of sin and Satan, would reign in us by his word and Spirit. — Attersoll. For the establishing of the kingdom of grace inwardly in men's hearts, and out- wardly in the visible church, and for the hastening of the kingdom, of glory. — Josias White. See also Ball, p. 77. Q. 103. What do ive pray for in the third Petition ? A. In the third Petition, (which is, Thy will he done on earth, as it is in heaven,) we pray, That God, by his grace, would make us able and willing to know, obey, and submit to his will in all things, as the Angels do in heaven. 36 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. Quest. 103. 1. That we may rightly know and understand God's will. 2. That denying our own wills, we may readily submit unto it, both in doing what he requireth, and in siiffering what he doth unto us, though never so contrary to our affections. 3. That we may do all this sia- cerely, cheerfully, constantly, and perfectly, as the saints and angels do in heaven. — Neiocomen. That we may yield ourselves wholly to his will in all things, and strive to go forward in the same till we meet in perfect obedience with his angels in heaven. — Giffard's Ca. [That all things may be ordered according to the counsell of God's will, and (John White)] that we, denying ourselves, may be wholly subject to his revealed will in suffering patiently, and performing cheerfully, whatsoever God hath appointed, as the angels do hi heaven. — Josias White. That God would incline the hearts of all his people unto his holy word, whereby they mai/ know and obey his will, and that under every cross which he shall lay upon us, we may possess our souls with patience. — Attersoll. Q. 104. JFhat do ive p'o.y for in the fourth Petition ? A. In the fourth Petition, (which is, Give us this day our daily bread,) we pray, That of God's free gift we may receive a com- petent portion of the good things of this life, and enjoy his blessing with them. Quest. 104. That God would from time to time supply unto us in a fit measure all necessaries for this life by lawful means, and bless them so unto us that we may use them unto our good with comfort. — Josias White. 1. That God will give us all things needful for this life ; 2. that God will give us his blessing with them. — Twisse. We pray for di competent and convenient measure of all earthly blessings, serving both for necessity and also for Christian delight and pleasure. — Attersoll. 1. That God will give lis such a portion of these outward things as he shall in his wisdom see convenient for us ; 2. that he wilMfenable us to labour in our calling, and bless our labours in them. — Newcomen. Q. 105. What do we pray for in the fifth Petition ? A. In the fifth Petition, (which is, And forgive us our debts, as ve forgive our debtors,) we pray. That God, for Christ's sake, would freely pardon all our sins ; which we are the rather incouraged to ask, because by his grace we are inabled from the heart to forgive others. Quest. 105. That God of his free grace and mercy in Christ would fully pardon all our sins, as we desire to forgive the wrongs and injuries done to us by others. — Brinsley. That God for Christ's sake, etc. — New- comen. That God would freely pardon our sins committed against him . . . justifying us in his Son Christ Jesus. — Attersoll. THE SHORTER CATECHISE!. 37 That we may feel and acknowledge our sins and obtain pardon of them in Christ. Q. Why is it added, As we forgive, etc. ? — A. That by forgiving others we may have a comfortable assurance that God hath forgiven us, and that we may labour to carry merciful hearts towards others, as we hope to obtain mercy. — Josias White. Q. 106. JVluit do we pray for in the sixth Petition ? A. In the sixth Petition, (which is, And lead us not into temp- tationy but deliver us from evil,) we pray. That God would either keep us from being tempted to sin, or support and deliver us when we are tempted. Quest. 106. That we rnay be delivered either from temptations them- selves, or from the evil of them. — Brinsley. That God would not give us over to our lusts and the temptations of Satan, but strengthen us with his Holy Si)irit always to strive against them, and that he would preserve and keep us from all their evil. — Giffard's Catechism. The moderating of our trials that they exceed not our strength . . . and assistance from God to resist them, so that we fall not into the power of Satan or any evil. — Josias White. 1. That God would keep me if it be his blessed will from entering the lists with Satan, or encountering any occasion of sin ; 2. that if I must needs be tempted, I be not overcome of any temptation. — Newcomen. Q. 107. llliat doth the Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer teach us ? A. The Conclusion of the Lord's Prayer, (which is, For thine is the kingdom, and the p)Oicer, and the glory, for ever. Amen.) teacheth us, to take our incouragement in prayer from God onely, and in our prayers to praise him, ascribing kingdom, power, and glory to him : And, in testimony of our desire, and assurance to be heard, we say, Amen. Quest. 107. That all honour and praise belongeth to God projjerlj^ and is to be referred in all things to him only, and that praise and thanks- giving are to be joined with prayer, — Xewcomen. To rest on God's power to perform whatsoever we pray for, and abas- ing ourselves to advance the Lord only, and ... to turn all that we beg and receive at God's hands to the glory of his name. — White. It con- taineth a thanksgiving wherein the government and ordering of all thino-s, together with the power and glory of the same, is ascribed wholly and only to the Lord. — Attersoll. Q. Why is there . . . mention made of the glory of God ? — A. To teach us to conclude all our prayers ivith praises of God. — Xowell. Q. Why are we taught to conclude with the word Amen ? — A. To testify thereby our fervent desire that it may be so, and our confidence that so it shall be as we have prayed. — Josias White, it 38 THE SHORTER CATECHISM. imparts (1) an assent of the mind to that we pray for ; (2) A desire of the heart that the things assented to may be obtained ; (3) An assurance of faith that we shall obtain them so far as shall be good for ns. — New- comen. It signifieth So be it, or so shall it he, first, shewing a fervent desire to have that I ask ; secondly, it is an assurance to my conscience that I shall have that I ask. — Attersoll and Twisse. THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. Exodus xx. THE LORD'S PRAYER. Matthew vi. OUE Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation ; but deliver us from evil : for thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen. THE CREED. IBELEEVE in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth ; and in Jesus Christ, his only Son our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, . suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, the state of the dead, dead, and buried : he descended into hell ; * ofdearhtuitheTMrd the third day he rose again from the dead; <^*y- he ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty ; from thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost ; the holy Catholick Church ; the communion of saints ; the forgiveness of sins ; the resurrection of the body ; and the life everlasting. Amen. THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 39 So much of every Question, both in the Larger and Shorter Catechism, is repeated in the Answer, as maketh every Answer an entire Proposition or sentence in itself: to the end the Learner may further improve it upon all occasions for his increase in knowledge and piety, even out of the course of catechising as well as in it. And albeit the substance of the Doctrine comprised in that abridgment commonly called, The Apostles* Creed, be fully set forth in each of the Catechisms, so as there is no necessity of inserting the Creed itself, yet it is here annexed, not as though it were composed by the Apostles, or ought to be esteemed Canonicall Scripture, as the Ten Commandments and the Lord's Prayer (much less a Prayer, as ignorant people have been apt to make both it and the Decalogue), but because it is a brief sum of the Christian faith agreeable to the Word of God, and anciently received in the Churches of Christ. Cornelius Burgess, Prolocutor pro t€mj>ore. Henry Roborough, Scriba. Adoniram Byfield, Scrihou A Short Catechisme IVherein are briefly handled the fundamental! principles of Christian Religion Needfull to be knowne by all Chris- tians before they be admitted to the Lord's Table. W hereunto are added sundry prayers. The seventh edition, corrected and inlarged by William Gouge. HeB. v. 12. When for the tune ye ought to be teachers, ye have need againe that one teach you which be the first Principles of the Oracles of God. LONDON Printed by John Beale 1635 TO THE CHRISTIAN READER. I AM not ignorant that thorow the good gift of the grace of God given to many faithfull ministers before my time, sufficient formes of Catechismes have been published, so as there was no need of publishing this little forme which folio weth. The Lord knoweth how far it was from my purpose to send it forth to the open view of the world. The occasion of first publishing it was this. When I used to catechise the youth of my parish, the minister which was assistant to me in my place copied out from time to time the heads of such points as I propounded to those whom I examined, and at length brought them to this forme. These heads were given forth beforehand to such as were to answer, that they might know whereabout they should be examined. Many other questions were out of them deducted, but these layd down as the ground work of all. By this meanes the printer got a coppy of them and published them once and againe before I yielded to father them. At the third impres- sion I was moved to revise the forenamed forme, and to acknow- ledge it to be mine ; which I doe not in any conceit of adding more than hath been before set down in other catechismes, but rather to testify mine owne faeth and consent to the doctrine long taught and received in this Church. Howsoever I think it very requisite that there were one compleat approved catechism to be used in all churches, yet I find that in all ages of the Church God hath stirred up many of his servants to publish several formes all agreeing in the substance; and I observe, among many other, these two good uses to arise from thence : First, That the doctrine of the gospell is by the mutuall 44 A SHORT CATECHISME. consent of many faithful ministers the more confirmed, as is the history of Christ penned by four severall witnesses all agreeing in substance, though varying in order, in phrase, and in brevity or prolixity. Secondly, That many more are in- structed in the principles of religion than otherwise would be ; for some desire one man's booke that would not another's, yea more bookes are vented, because they come from severall authors, than would be if they came from one. In hope that these briefe rudiments will turne to the prejudice of none, but to the edification of some, I commend them to the Church of God, and myselfe to the prayers thereof Will. Gouge. A Short Prayer before reading or hearing of iJie Holy Scriptures expounded, or learning of the Principles of Christian Religion, Father of Light, who hast been pleased to vouchsafe unto us poore miserable sinners, who by nature sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, the light to direct us thorow the dark- ness of this world unto the light of glory, We beseech thee to pardon all our sins, and to open the blind eyes of our under- standing, that we may rightly conceive thy Word, and withall to give us grace rightly to apply it unto our owne hearts, and to yield all holy obedience thereunto through Jesus Christ our Lord and only Saviour. Amen. A SHORT CATECHISME. 45 A BRIEFE METHOD of Catechising, wherein are handled The Fimdamental Principles of Christian Religion. [SPECIMEN.] Qu. What is everyone bound to knoiv ? Ans. God, and Himselfe. Q. Where is this knowledge to he had ? A. In the holy Scriptures, contained in the Old and New Testament. Q. Who is the author of those Scriptures ? A. The Holy Spirit of God, who inspired holy men to write them. Q. What is God ? A. A Spirit of infinite perfection. Q. Hoio mamj Gods are there ? A. Onely one : but distinguished into three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. Q. How is God further made known unto us ? A. By his properties, and by his workes. Q. What are the properties of God ? A. No other than the very essence or nature of God, but as certaine attributes applyed to him to distinguish him from all creatures. 46 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What are the kindes of them ? A. Either incommunicable, which are so proper to God alone, as in no respect they can be attributed to any creature ; or communicable, which in some respects are attributed also to creatures. Q. Rehearse some of the former kind, A. Eternity without beginning; Infinitenesse, filling all places ; Prescience, knowing all things before hand ; Immuta- bility, not subiect to any change ; All-sufficiency in himselfe, Omnipotencie, etc. Q. Rehearse some of the latter kind. A. Power, Purity, Wisedome, Truth, Justice, Mercy, etc. Q. What difference is there betwixt these latter properties as they are in God, and as they are in the creatures ? A. I. God hath them of and from himself; the creature receiueth them from God. IT. God hath al of them infinitely without measure ; the creature hath but a portion. Q. What are the workes of God ? A. His decree, and the execution therof. Q. What heleeve you concerning God's Decree in generall ? A. That he ordained all things before all times, according to his will. Q. What heleeve you concerning God's particular decree of men .? A. That God from all eternity elected some to be saued in Christ, and left others to be damned for their sins. Q. What is the principcdl end that God aymed at therein. ?■ A. The Glory of his Mercy and his Justice. Q. Wherein consisteth the execution of God's decree .? A. In making and gouerning all things. Q. How did God make all things ? A. By his Word, of nothing, in six dayes, very good. A SHORT CATECHISME. 47 Q. How did God governe all things 2 A. As by wise prouidence he preserueth all, so he disposeth them to his own glory, and his childrens good. Q. How may we come to the knowledge of our selves ? A. By a due consideration of the seuerall estates of man. Q. Which are they l A. 1. That happy estate wherein man was made. 2. That miserable state wherinto he fel. 3. That renewed estate where- unto by grace he is called. 4. That glorious estate which is in Heauen reserued for him. Q. Doe all men passe thorow all these estates ? A. No ; not all; but onely the elect : the other as they fel into misery, so in misery they lye for euer. Q. Wherein did that happinesse consist in tchich man was first made .? A. In that he was made after God's Image. Q. In what respect is he said to he made after God^s Image } A. In that he was indued with perfect knowledge, and with true holiness and righteousnesse. Q. Have we any platforme of that holinesse and righteousnesse ? A. Yea, the law of God, consisting of ten seuerall commande- ments. Q. Which are those ten Commandements ? A. Those which God himselfe vttered on Mount Sinai to the Israelites, and after wrote in two tables. Q. Rehearse them. A. I am the Lord thy God ; thou shalt have no other gods before me, etc. 48 A SHORT CATECHISME. A brief e Abstract of the former Catechisme for the helpe of the younger and ignoranter sort. Q. What are we most hound to know ? A. 1. God. 2. Ourselves, Q. Where Is this knowledge to be had ? A. In God's Word. Q. By what is God made knowne ? A. 1. By His nature. 2. By His persons. 3. By His properties. 4. By His workes. Q. What is God ? A. A Spirit of infinite perfection. Q. How many Gods are there ? A. One onely. Q. Into how many persons is this one God distinguished ? A. Into three, 1. The Father. 2. The Sonne. 3. The Holy Ghost. Q. How is God further made knowne to us? A. By His workes. Q. What are they ? A. 1. Creation. 2. Providence. Q. How did God create things ? A. By His Word, of nothing, in six days, very good. Q. Wherein is God's providence manifested? A. 1. In preserving things. 2. In governing them. Q. What was mans first estate wherein God made him ? A . Most holy and happy. Q. What is now his naturall estate ? A. Most miserable. Q. Hoiu did man become miserable ? A. By sinne. Q. What is sinne ? A. A breach of God's law. Q. What are the kindes of sinne ? A. 1. Originall, which is the cor- ruption of nature. 2. Actuall, which is the fruit of that corruption. Q. What are those fruits ? A. Evill thoughts, words, and deeds. Q. How are they manifested ? A. 1. By omitting good. 2. By committing evill. 3. By doing good evilly. Q. What hath sin pulled on man ? A. All sorts of miseries, with death and damnation. Q. Can any free himself from this miserable estate ? A. No. Q. Is there then no hope of being freed from it ? A. Yes. A SHORT CATECHISME. 49 Q. By u'hom ? A. By Jesus Christ alone. Q. What Is he ? A. God and man in one person, Q. What offices hath Christ under- taken/or us? A. 1. A propliet to reveal his Father's will to us. 2. A king to govern us. 3. A priest to make satisfaction and intercession for us. Q. What further did Christ for our redemption ? A. He fulfilled the righteousness of the law. Q. Hoio appeares it that he icas made a curse? A. By his death on the Crosse. Q. Did Christ free himself e there- from ? A. Yea ; for on the third day he rose again from the dead. Q. Whither went he after his re- I surrection? ' A. He ascended into heaven, and there he sitteth at the right hand '' of God. Q. How are men made partakers \ of the benefit of those things which Christ did and suffered? A. By Faith, Q. What benefit doth faith receive from Christ ? ^. 1. A right to the things of I this world. 2. Justification from oursinnes. 3. Sanctification of soule and body. 4. Eternall salvation. Q. How is true faith manifested? A. By repentance. Q. What are the parts of repent- ance ? A. 1. Dying to sin. 2. Living in righteousness. Q. How is faith icrowjht ? A. By the word. Q. How is it strengthened ? A. By the sacraments. Q. What are the paints of a sacra- ment? A. 1. A visible signe. 2. In- visible grace. Q. Why are these joy ned together ? A. By the visible signe the in- visible grace is sealed up to us. Q. How many sacraments are there? A. Two : Baptisme and the Lord's Supper. Q. What is the speciall use of Baptisme ? A. To ingraffe us into Christ. Q. What is the outward signe thereof? A. Water. Q. What doth it set out ? A. Christ's blood. Q. What doth the sprinkling of- water in baptism set out ? A. The renewing of our nature. Q. What is the special use of the Lord's Supper ? A. To make us grow in grace. Q. What are the outward meanes thereof ? A. Bread and Wine. Q. What doth the Bread set out ? A. Christ's Body. Q. What doth the Wine set out ? A. Christ's Blood. Q. Why is Christ's Body set out by bread? A. To shew that he is spiritual! food. D 50 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. Why is his Blood set out by Q. What becomes of men's bodies wine ? after death ? A. To shew that he is spirituall A. They shall be raised from refreshing. death. Q. What males God's ordinances Q. What becomes of their souls ? effectuall? ^. They never die. ^. The inward operation of God's ^ 07 ,, , ^ ^ „^ g — ^ Q. b hall the future estate of all be alike ? Q. What must we do to obtain all a -xt needfull blessings ? ^. Pray to God. Q- Where shall the faithfull be ? Q. What must we return for bless- ^- ^^^ ^^^"^ i'^ heavenly glory. ings received ? Q. Where the wicked ? A. Praise to God. A. For ever in hell torments. A Prayer drawn out of all the principles contained in this Catechisme. Blessed be thy name, heavenly Father, who hast been pleased to vouchsafe unto us the bright light of thy Word, wherby we attaine to knowledge of Thee and of ourselves : By it are we taught that thou art the only true God, one in essence but distinguished into three persons. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit ; which mysterie never was nor can be applied to any false god. Thou art of infinite perfection, eternall without beginning, filling all places, knowing all things, searching the hearts and trying the reins of men, all-sufficient in thyselfe, almighty, able to do what thou wilt, not subject to any change, a God most pure, wise, just, faithfull, and mercifull : who from all eternity hast ordained all things according to thine owne will ; and in the beginning of time didst of nothing by thy word make all things very good, and ever since by thy wise providence hast upheld all things, and disposed them to thine own glory and thy children's good. grant that by this knowledge of Thee we may learne to esteeme and respect Thee as the only true God : which we are bound unto because we are thy creatures, the worke of thine hands, whom Thou didst at first make in a most haj)py estate even after thine own image in A SHORT CATECHISME. 51 perfect knowledge and true holiness and righteousness, engrav- ing in man's heart thy whole law, that perfect platforme of holiness and righteousness, and giving him power perfectly to fulfill the same. But wretched man, not considering as he ought that goodness done to him, transgressed the charge that Thou gavest him, and by sin hath made himselfe a most miser- able wretch. For being deprived of that grace which Thou shewedst him, he is altogether drenched in sin and polluted therewith. All mankind is now conceived and born in sin. From that originall corruption many bitter fruits in evil thoughts, words, and deeds, daily do proceed. Yea, of so perverse a dis- position we are, as we omit the good we should do, and commit the evill we should not do, and very sinfully performe all the good things that we take in hand whereby we have pulled upon ourselves thy curse, which causeth all miseries in this life, and in the end death and eternall torment in hell : from which misery we are no way able to helpe ourselves, being dead in sin, vassals of Satan, and in the most wofuU plight that possibly can be. But thy endlesse mercy hath afforded unto us a Savior to deliver us out of this endlesse misery, even thine owne Son Jesus Christ, who being true God was made flesh, and by the union of his two natures in one person became a sufficient Saviour ; for he being true man was subject to death, so as by the same nature which had sinned was a satisfaction made for sin : and being God he supported his manhood with infinite power to brave that infinite burthen which was laid on him as a surety for us sinners, and his satisfaction was of infinite value i to turne away thy wrath and to procure thy favour : yea, for our greater good he became our Prophet to reveale thy will unto us and to write it in our hearts : our King to protect and provide for us and to destroy all our enemies : and our priest to make satisfaction and intercession for us : which intercession, after that he rose from death and ascended into heaven, he con- tinueth to make at thy right hand. All these things we stead- fastly beleeve, and in this faith approach to the throne of thy grace, humbly and earnestly entreating Thee to accept of us in this Son of thy love, to forgive us all our sins, and to sanctifie us throughout, that our minds may be enlightened with a saving knowledge of the mysteries of godliness, and that also true 52 A SHORT CATECHISME. repentance may be wrought in us : for which purpose, we beseech Thee to give us a sight and sense of our spirituall miserie and godly sorrow for the same; but withall work in us faith in the pardon of sin, that thus we may daily mortifie our corruptions, and live in true holiness and righteousness. For the working and increasing of these and all other needful graces in us, it hath pleased Thee to sanctifie the ministry of thy Word and the administration of thy Sacraments : Now, therefore, holy Father, we beseech Thee to continue among us these thy holy ordi- nances, and to give us grace to make a right use of the same : Grant that we giving diligent heed to thy word may mix faith with the hearing by beleeving it as truth, and applying it as a truth which concerns ourselves in particular : And for the strengthening of our faith and renewing of our repentance, grant that we oft call to mind thy covenant sealed to us by baptisme in our infancy, and the promise there made to Thee on our parts; and withall take such occasions as are offered unto us of our partaking of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ at the Table of the Lord, coming preparedly thereunto by examining of ourselves, and that especially about our knowledge, faith, repentance, and love. Now, praier being a farther meanes to obtaine thy blessings on these thine ordinances, and on every good thing that we take in hand, give unto us, we beseech Thee, the spirit of supplication ; assist and direct us therin by thy Spirit, that we may powre forth our souls before Thee after a right manner, thorow the mediation of Christ, in truth, faith, holiness, and love, and in all things give thankes unto Thee, even for publike and private blessings, concerning body or soul, ourselves or others, whether received or promised, as now from our hearts we doe. Finally, we beseech Thee, Lord our God, of thy free grace to grant that when our souls and bodies doe depart one from the other, our souls may be taken to glory in heaven, and our bodies quietly sleepe till the day of resurrection, and then the body being raised from death, both body and soule may againe be united and enjoy everlasting happiness, and that for Jesus Christ his sake, in whose name we beg these and all other needfull blessings even in that perfect platforme of prayer which he himselfe hath prescribed unto us, saying, Our Father, etc. THE CHIEF GROUNDS OF Christian Religion SET DOWN BY WAY OF CATECHISING GATHERED LONG SINCE FOR THE USE OF AN HONOURABLE FAMILY BY EZEKIEL ROGERS, MINISTER OF god's WORD, SOMETIME OF ROWLEY IN YORKSHIRE, NOW IN NEW ENGLAND. Gen. 1 8. 17, 19. LONDON Printed by L L. for Christopher Meredith, at the sign of the Crane in Paul's Churchyard, 1642 (May 21). THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Bccles. 12. 13. John 5. 39. Scriptures. 2 Pet. 1. 23. oJohn 17. 3. b Rev. 3. 17. Ck>d. el Cor. 8. 6. dJo. 4. 24. e Exo. 3. 14. /Exo. 34. 6. g Rom. 1. 20. Properties. a 1 Kings 8. 27. b Psal. 90. 2. cPsal. 102. 27. Question. WTierefore hath God given to man a reasonable and an immortall soul ? A\nsicer]. That he above all other creatures should seek God's glory and his own salvation. Q. Wliere is he taught hoiv this is to be done ? A. In the Scriptures or Word of God. Q. JVhat are the Scriptures ? A. The Canonicall books of the Old and Xewe Testament. Q. Wlutt do the Scriptures teach us ? A. The true knowledsre of ^God and of ^ourselves. o The first generall head ; of God. Q. JVhat is God ? A. God is ''one **holy Spirit having ^being of himself. Q. How is the nature of God farther made l-notvn to us ? A. By his ^properties and ^works. Q. Whiche he his chief properties ? A. ^Infiniteness, ^eternity, and ^'unchangeable- ness ; to which may be added his understanding, will and power. 56 THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Persons. 1 John 5. 7. Works. Decree. Eph. 1. 11. Predestination Election. Reprobation. Rom. 9. 13, 22. Creation. Col. 1. 16. Providence. a John 5. 17. h Matt. 10. Angels. 2 Pet. 3. 4. 2 Tiin. 5. 2. Man. His fourfold estate. Innocency. Gen. 1. 27. Q. How many persons be there in the Godhead ? A. Three, the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Q. If every 'person he God, then there he three Gods 1 A. Every person is that one and the same God. Q. Which he the worhs of God ? A. His decree and the fulfilling thereof. Q. What is the decree of God ? A. His purpose or aj^pointment with himself how all things should be, before any thing was made. Q. J'FIiat is his decree concerning angels and men ? A. That which theScripture calleth Predestination. Q. Wliich he the parts of it ? A. Election and reprobation. Q. How hath God fulfilled this decree ? A. By creation and providence. Q. What was the creation ? A. The making of all things of nothing very good. Q. Wlud is his providence ? A. The * upholding and ^governing of that which he had made. Q. Concerning the reasonable creatures, first, how did God govern the angels ? A. By teaching them all ; by leaving the evill to themselves, and confirming the elect. The second generall head ; of Man. Q. TVhat doth the Scriptures teach us concerning man ? A. His fourfold estate of innocency, misery, grace, and immortality. The first estate. Q. Wierein consisted man's innocency ? A. That he was created in Adam according to God's image. THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 57 Image of (Jod. Col. 3. 10. Happinesse. cGen. 2. 26, Covenant of nature. Gal. 3. 12. Q. IFJiat teas this image of God ? A. A likeness to God in his holy properties. Q. What priviledge Jmd man hereby ? A. All inward and outward happines. Q. Hoi'j did God govern man in this estate ? A. By *^teaching him and making a covenant with him. Q. JVhat was thai covenant ? A. Do this and thou shalt live. Misery. Fall. Rom. 3. 23. Gen. 3. 1. Adam's sin Gen. 3. 7. Fonishment. Rom. 8. 20. a Rom. 3. 23. h Gen. 3. 8. cRom. 5. 12. Rom. 5. 18. Sin. 1 John 3. 4. Tlie second estaie of misery. Q. Did man continue in this happinesse awl covenant ? I A. No ; he fell away from God. i Q. How came this to passe .? A. Being left of God to the liberty of his will, through his own weaknesse, he was overcome by I Satan's temptation. ' Q. TFliat ivas Adam's sin ? A. Disobedience against God in eating the for- bidden fruit. Q. IFliat foUov:ed hereupon ? A. A miserable condition on himself and all the creatures. Q. Wliat upon himself ? A. ^Losse of God's image, ^guiltines of conscience, *= death temporall and eternall. Q. Came this only upon Adam ? ^. No ; all we being in his loyns were partakers of his sin and punishment. Q. Shew noio what is sin. A. Every transgression or swarving from the law. Q. How many sorts of sin are there ? A. Two, originall and actuall. 58 THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Ori^nall sin. Psal. 51. 5. aHeb. 7. 9. h Rom. 7. 14. cRom. 7. 7. Actuall sin. Jam. 1. 15. Matt. 15. 19. Acts 4. 12. Grace. dJohn 3. 16. e Gal. 3. 17. Ck)venant of Grace. Col. 1. 20. Heb. 1. 1. Christ. a Rom. 1. 4. His natures. h Rom. 1. 3. c Col. 2. 9. dHeb. 2. 16. e Prov. 14. /Heb. 7. 25. Office. 9- Heb. 9. 15. Q. JVliat is (ytiginall sin ? A. The corruption or stain of our nature wherein we were born. Q. Wliat else is contained in it ? A. ^Guiltinesse of Adam's sin, ^pronenesse to all evill and ^concupiscence. Q. What is actuall sin ? A. The fruit of originall, in evill thoughts, words and deeds. Q. Are ive able to hear or avoyd that fear full punish- ment of sin ? A. No ; nor any mere creature for us. The third estate of grace, Q. Is there no means to come out of this misery and to he reconciled to God ? A. Yes; ^G-od of his mercy hath found out a means by making a ®new covenant with us in Jesus Christ. Q. Is it the same covenant in the Old and New Testament .? A. The same for substance, but diverse for manner of revealing. Q. Wliat was this Jesus Christ ? A. Both ^God and ^Man in ^one Person. Q. JVJiy must he he both God and man ? A. Man, that in *^our nature he might ® suffer; and God that he might ^overcome death for us. Q. Wliat is his office ? A. To be ^mediator between God and man. Q. Which he the parts of his office ? A. That he is our Prophet, Priest, and King. THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 59 Prophetical. John 15. 15. Heb. 1. 2. Priestly. Rev. 5. 9. Phil. 2. His bumUl- ation. Phil. 2. 8. Rom. 8. 3, 4. Glorification. oActs 2. 31. ft Acts 1. 19. cEph. 1. 20. Redemption. Heb. 7. 25. Zingly OflBce. John 3. 35. Church Visible. Matt. 13. 47. Invisible. dl Pet. 2. 9. el Johnl. 3. : Calling:. /Matt. 28. 16. grJohn 14. 6. Q. Row is he our Prophet ? A. Bj revealing to us the will of his Father. Q. How is he our Priest ? A. By working the merit of our redemption. Q. How ivr ought he it ? A. In the twofold estate of his humiliation and glorification. Q, IVliat were the degrees of his humiliation ? A. Three; his incarnation, poor life, death and passion. Q. WJiat did Christ in this estate ? A. He suffered and fulfilled whatsoever our nature was bound to. Q. What were the degrees of his glorification ? A. Three also; his * resurrection, ^ascension, and ^sitting at the right hand of his Father. Q. What hath Christ wrought by all these ? A. Our full redemption, and doth still make in- tercession for us. Q. What doth Christ as he is our king ? A. He governs the church both visible and in- visible, and shall be judge of the world. Q. Wiat is the visible church ? A. A company of men professing the worship of the true God. Q. What is the invisible church ? A. The number of the ^elect who have ®com- munion together ; whether militant or triumphant. Q. How doth Christ govern the visible church ? A. First by a ^generall calling of all ; secondly, by an ^effectuall calling of the elect, whereby the benefits of his mediation are applyed to them. 60 THE CHIEFS GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Preaching of Word. ^Rom. 10. 17. iActs 16. 14. Law. aRom. 3. 10, and 7. 7. 6 Rom. 7. 10. Acts 2. 37. cGal. 3. 24. Gospel. dLuke 15. 19. Mark 9. 24. eGal. 3. 17. Acts 16. 31. Faith. John 1. 12. lJohn5. 10,11. Lets of it. /Matt. 4. 19. g2 Cor. 4. 4. Luke 14. 18,19. Degrees. Luke 17. 5. Matt. 8. 26. Companions. 7iRom. 5. 1. iLuke 7. 47. fcActs 8. 50. ZPsa. 116. 12. mPhil. 1. 23. ■nRom. 5. 4. Privileges. Q. By what means doth he api^ly these henefits to the elect ? A. Ordinarily by the ^outward preaching of the law and gospel, and Hhe inward working of the Spirit. Q. Wliat doth the Spirit work in them hy tJie preach- ing of the laiD 2 A. A ^sight of their sin and misery and ^trouble of heart for it, whereby they are brought to ^see need of Christ. Q. TVliat ivorketh he by the gospel 1 A. An earnest and constant ^desire of Christ, even till they can apply him. Q. What is that grace whereby ive apply Christ .? A. Justifying faith or believing, which is the first and main thing in the ^covenant on our part. Q. J'FJiat is this faith ? A. It is such a receiving of Christ, who is offered in the promises of the gospel, as whereby I come to be persuaded, that all he hath done is done for me. Q. Which be the chief lets of faith ? A. *Want of the means, or terror in the use of them. Q. Is the greatest measure of faith wrought at the first .? ^. No ; but by degrees. Q. Which he those graces or affections that accompany faith more or lesse as it is stronger or weaker ? A. ^Peace of conscience, ^love, ^joy, Hhankful- nesse, "desire of God's presence, ^4iope, etc. Q. Wliat are those henefits or priviledges thai we re- ceive hy faith in this life ? A. Three especially; justification, adoption, and sanctification. THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 61 Justification. 2 Cor. 5. 21. Horn. 5. 19. Adoption. Rom. 8. 17. Sanctification. Tit. 3. 5. Rom. 6. 11. 1 Thess. 5. 23. Of the soul. oEph. 4. 23. pPro. 2. 5, 9. gActs 24. 16. rRom. 7. 18. s Gal. 5. 21. tFsa,. 19. 16. Body. Rom. 6. 13. Repentance. Mark 1. 15. ft Gal. 5. 6. 2 Cor, 5. 14. c2 Cor. 6. 9. New Ufe. d2 Cor. 5. 17. eEsay 1.16,11 /Acts 26. 20. Q. What is justification ? A. It is that whereby God accounts us righteous, through Christ's merits. Q. How is this done ? A. By laying our sins and punishment on him, and imputing his righteousness to us. Q. What is adoption ? A. That whereby we are made the children of God and heirs with Christ. Q. JFIiat is sanctification ? A. The purifying of our Whole nature. Q, Which be the parts of it ? A. Mortifying and quickening. Q. Hoiv is our nature- purified ? A. Both in soul and body. Q. How the soul ? A. In the faculties of the ^imagination, p under- standing, ^conscience, the heart (which is the ^will and ^affections) and the * memory. Q. How the body ? A. The members thereof are made weapons of righteousness. Q. But what is that grace which necessarily folloiveth all these in the believer ? A. Eepentance, which is the second part of our covenant. Q. What is repentance as it is here taken ? A. It is a ^ fruit of faith, which from the feeling of God's love, and ^sorrow for sin, bringeth forth ^a new life. Q. TFJierein doth it consist ? A. ® First, in the hatred and forsaking of all evil. Secondly, in an earnest desire to please God in all things alwaies : which is our doing of ^good works. 62 THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Good works. Exod. 38. 36,37. Rule of Godliness. Law. Exod. 20. 12. Two tables. Com. 1. Com. 2. Com. 3. Com. 4. Com. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10. Helps of Godlinesse. Publike. a Est. 4. 16. 62 Chr. 20. 26. cNeh. 8. 4. (ZDeut. 31. 11. «Matt. 18. 15, 16, 17. Q. Can we then do good worts ? A. Not perfectly, but God accepts of them through Christ his intercession. Q, Wlmt rule have we to teach us what evil to leave and good to do ? A, The law of God in the ten commandments. Q. Hoiv many tables is the law divided into ? A. Two; the first containing four commandments, the other six. Q. IVliat is the sum of the first commandment ? A. That we chuse the true God for our God and set our hearts upon him. Q. What is the sum of the second ? A. That we worship him only, and that with his own worship. Q. What the third ? A. That we use his name reverently at all times, as well as in his solemn worship. Q. Wliat the fourth ? A. That we worship him more specially on the Sabbath. Q. What is the summe of the second table ? A. That we maintain our neighbours and our own ^dignity, ^life, ^chastity, ^goods, ^good name; yea even' Q. What nesse ? A. Many both publike and private. Q. What be the publike ? A. Either extraordinary, as holy * fasting and ^feasting; or ordinary, as the use of the word ^preached and '^read, the sacraments prayer and ® discipline. ^^ in our first thoughts. and means have we to grow in godli- THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 63 Sacraments. Roin. 4. 11. al Cor. 11. 2, 3. J Gen. 17. 10. cExod. 12. 11. Baptism. Gal. 3. 23. Lord's Supper. 1 Cor. 10. 16. 1 Cor. 1. 26. Prayer. 1 John 5. 14. Lord's Prayer. Matt. 6. 9. Farts of it Petitions. Private helps. a Gen. 24. 63. 6 Deut. 17. 19. cGen. 18. 17,19. Q. What are the sacraments ? A. The visible signs and seals of the covenant, ordained of God, to represent and confirm the same unto us. Q. Hoiv m.any sacraments are there in the gospel ^ A. *Two only, Baptisme and the Lord's Supper, as under the law were ^circumcision and the *^ Passover. Q. What is Baptism ? A. A sacrament of our new birth and entrance into the state of grace. Q. TFhat is the LordJs Supper ? A. A sacrament of our growth and increase in grace. Q. What is prayer ? A. It is a calling upon God only in the name of Christ. Q. How many parts of prayer are there ? A. Three ; confession, petition, and thanksgiving. Q. What pattern of prayer have we ? A. The Lord's prayer. Q. How many things are to be considered in this prayer ? A. Three ; the preface, the prayer itself, and the conclusion. Q. For the prayer itself, how many petitions are in it ? A. Six ; three concerning God's glory and three for our necessities. Q, What learn we by this prayer ? A. Both what we should pray for; and how, namely, with preparation, faith, love, reverence, zeal, confidence, and continuance. Q. TFhich be the private helps ? A. ^Private prayer, ^reading, ^family exercese and the rest. G4 THE CHIEFE GROUNDS OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION. Lets to Godliness. dRev. 2. 4, 5. Renewed Repentance. 2 Cor. 7. 8... 11. Perseverance. Phil. 1. 6. Death. Eccl. 12. 9. Judgment. Judge. 2 Tim. 4. 1. 1 Cor. 15. 15. Resurrection. Acts 24. 25. 1 Cor. 15. Eternal life and death. Matt. 25. 46. Q. Which he the lets to a godly life ? A. Tliey are many : but for the most part they are either from the '^Aveakenino; of faith or the neglect of the means. Q. But ivhat if a true Christian fall into sin after he hath repented ? A. He must then renew his repentance and covenant with God. Q. But may he not fall finally ? A. No, for he hath promise of perseverance. The fourth estate of immortality. Q. Wliat becomes of a man at his death ? A. The body goeth to the grave, the soul to the place thereof till the judgment. Q. Who shall he the judge of the tvorld ? A. Christ, for it is the last part of his kingly office. Q. fVliat shall he the preparation to the judgment .? A. The resurrection of the dead and change of the living. Q. What shall then he the estate of the godly ? A. Eternall life in glory. Q. What shall he the estate of the wicked ? A. Everlasting damnation. Eev. 20. 6. I^Xtz&tti anb hols is he that hath ?jart in the first xzsmxzcixon : fox on such the stconb ieath hath no ipoixitt. FINIS. A SHORT CATECHISME CONTAINING THE PRINCIPLES OF RELIGION VERY PROFITABLE FOR ALL SORTS OF PEOPLE The Nineteenth Impression. LONDON: Printed by T B. ioi /oh?i Wright, dwelling in little Old Bailey, 1642. E A SHORT CATECHISME, Q. What might to he the chief e and continuall care of every man in this life ? A. To glorifie ^God and save his ^^soule. a\ Cor. 10. 31 ; b Acts 16. 30, 31 ; Matt. 16. 26. Q. Whence must we take direction to attaine hereunto ? A. Out of the word of God ^alone. — «John 20. 31. Q. What call you the Word of God ? A. The holy Scripture immediately ^inspired, which is con- tained in the books of the Old and New Testament. — *^2 Tim. 3. 16. Q. Wliat are the hooks of the Old Testament ? A. Moses ^and the Prophets. — ^Luke 24. 37. Q. Which are the hooks of the New Testament ? A. Matthew, Marke, Luke, and the rest as they follow in our Bible. Q. How may it he proved that these hooks are the luord of God immediately inspired hy the Holy Ghost to the Prophets and Apostles ? A. By the testimony of the ^church, constancy of the ^saints, miracles ^wrought to confirm the truth, and the antiquity 'thereof. /2 Pet. 1. 9 ; sr Rev. 6. 9 ; 7i 1 Kings 17. 24 ; Joh. 3. 2 ; i Jer. 6. 16 ; Heb. 13. S. Q. How else ? A. By the ^style, ^efficacy, sweet ^consent, admirable "doc- trine, excellent ^end, and the witnesse ^of the Scripture itself fcGen. 17. 1 ; Psa. 50. 1 ; Esa. 44. 24 ; Gen. 2. 17 ; Exod. 20. 1, 2 ; Joel 1. 1 ; 1 Cor. 11. 23 ; Joh. 3. 36 ; 1 Cor. 3. 23, 24 ; I P.sal. 14. 8 ; Rom. 15. 4 ; Acts 5. 38, 39 ; Rom. 7. 7 ; Zacli. I 13. 2; Zeph. 2. 11; Acts 9. 5, 20, 21; Phil. 1. 12, 13; Rom. 15. 19; 2 Cor. 4. 8, 9, 10; I mGen. 3. 15 and 49. 10 ; Esa. 9. 6 ; Dan. 2. 24 ; Mat. 1. 18 ; Acts 10. 43 ; 7vPsa. 119. 129, 138, 172 ; Dent. 45. 6 ; o John 20. 31 ; p2 Tim. 3. 6 ; 2 Pet. 1. 19. 08 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. These reasons may convince any, he he never so ohstinate, but are they sufficient to ])ersuade the heart thereof ? A. ^o; the testimony of the Spirit is ^necessary and onely ^all-sufficient for this purpose. q 1 Cor. 2. 14 ; r 1 John 2. 20, 27. Q. JFJiat are the ]jro]perties of the Scripture ? A. It is of divine ^authoritie, the rule ^of faith and manners, "necessarie, ^pure, ^perfect, and ^plaine. s2 Tim. 3. 16; iEccles. 12. 10; Gal. 6. 16; liRom. 10. 14 ; vPsal. 12. 6 ; a;Psal. 19. 7 ; y Prov. 8. 9. Q. For what end tvas the Scripture written ? A. To teach, instruct, convince, correct, and comfort. 2 Tim. 3. 16, 17 ; Rom. 15. 4. Q. Doth the hioivledge of the Scriptures belong unto all men ? A. Yea all men are not onely ^allowed, but exhorted and com- manded, to ^read, heare, and ^understand the Scriptures. a John 5. 39 ; & Deut. 17. 18. 19 ; Rev. 1. 3 ; c Acts 8. 30. Q. The Scriptures were written in Hebrew and Greeke, how then shall all men read and understand them ? A. They ought to be ^translated into knowne tongues, and ^interpreted. dl Cor. 14. 18, 19 ; eNeh. 8. 8 ; Acts 8. 35. Q. What doth the Scripture especially teach us ? A. The saving ^knowledge of God, and Jesus Christ. /John 17. 3 ; Col. 2. 1, 2. Q. How may it be proved that there is a God ? A. By the §^workes and ^wonders which are seene, the testi- monie of ^conscience, the powers '^of the soule, and the practices of ^ Satan. (?Psal. 19. 1, 2 ; Esa. 41. 23 ; Rom. 1. 20 ; Acts 14. 17 ; Job 12. 7, 8, 9 ; ZiExod. 8. 19 and 9. 16 ; iRom. 2. 15 ; Esa. 33. 14 ; Psa. 14. 5 and 53. 5 ; fcZech. 12. 1 ; Psal. 94. 8, 9, 10 ; I Rev. 12. 7, 10. Q. How else ? A. By the consent of nations, defence of the "^church, "sup- port and comfort of the godly, but principally by ^the Scriptures. mPsal. 9. 16 and 58. 10, 11 ; n Jer. 33. 9 ; oEsa. 42. 8. Q. TFJiat is God ? A. He is a ^Spirit, having his being of '^himselfe. J) John 4. 24 ; q Exod. 3. 14. A SHORT CATECHISME. 69 Q. How many Gods be there ? A. Onely one ''God and three ^persons, the Father, Sonne, and Holy Ghost. r Deut. 6. 4, 6 ; 1 Cor. 8. 4, 6 ; s Matt. 28. 19 ; 1 John 5. 7. Q. What is the pvpertie of the Father ? A. To be of himselfe and to *^beget his Sonne. — ^John 1. 18 and 3. 16. Q. What is the propertie of the Sonne ? A. To be begotten "of the Father.— "John 3. 18. Q. Wliat is the propertie of the Holy Ghost ? A. To proceed from the ^^ Father and the '^ Sonne. w John 15. 26 ; a; Rom. 8. 9; Gal. 4. 6. Q. The nature of God is infinite and incomprehensible, how then may we conceive of him ? A. By his ^properties and by his ^workes. y Exod. 34. 6, 7 ; z Psal. 19. 1, and 8. 1. Q. What are his properties ? A. He is most *wise, ^strong, ^'good, ^gracious, "^just, ^merci- ful, ^perfect, ^blessed, and ^glorious. a Rom. 16. 27 ; 5 Job 12. 13 ; c Matt. 19. 17 ; d Exod. 83. 13 ; Rom. 5. 8 ; c Psal. 145. 17 ; / Psal. 103. 11, and 145. 8, 9 ; gf Matt. 5. 48 ; Job 35. 7,8; h Mar. 14. 61 ; Rom. 9. 5 ; il Cor. 2. 8. Q. -What are his ivorkes ? A. They are three ; Decree, Creation, and Providence. Q. What is the decree ? A. That whereby God hath from eternitie set ^downe with himself whatsoever shall come to passe. — '^Eph. 1. 11. Q. What is creation ? A. That whereby God made all things of hiothing in °^six dayes. IHeb. 11. 3 ; mExod. 20. 11. Q. In what form or manner ivere all things created ? A. In an excellent "order, and exceeding ^good. n Jer. 10. 12 ; oGen. 1. 31. 70 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. For what end did God make all things ? A. For the praise of his power, Pgoodnesse, wisclome, per- fection, and freedom. — PProv. 16. 4; Eev. 4. 11. Q. What is ^providence ? A. That whereby God doth ^preserve and governe ''all things, with all their actions. q Psal. 36. 6 ; 1 Tim. 4. 10 ; r Prov. 15. 3 ; Matth. 10. 29, 30, 31. Q. What are the special creatures made and p-eserved and governed hy the Lord ? A. Angels «and men.— ^Heb. 2. 7 ; Col. 1. 16. Q. Wliat luas the estate of man by creation ? A. Marvellous, Mioly, and happy. — ^Eccles. 7. 29. Q. IFliy say you thcd man ivas holy ? A. Because he was "created after the image of God, in knowledge, righteousnesse, and true holinesse. u Gen. 1. 26 ; Col. 3. 10 ; Eph. 4. 23, 24. Q. WTierein did man's happinesse consist ? A. In the enjoying ^of sweet peace and communion with God.— ^Gen. 1. 29. Q. TFhat farther privileges did man enjoy in this estate of inno- cencie ? A. He was placed in ^Paradise, had liberty to eat of every tree ^of the garden except the ^tree of knowledge of good and evil, and was made * ruler of all earthly creatures. xGen. 2. 15; i/Gen. 2. 10; sGen. 2. 17; a Gen. 2. 19; Psal. 8. 6. Q. Were these tilings hestoived upon man Uiat he might live as he list ? A. No; but that he might serve the ''Lord his maker, who therefore gave man a ^law, binding him always to perfect obedience, and a special commandment to trie him. h Rev. 4. 11 ; Psal. 95. 6 ; c Rom. 2. 14. Q. What ivas that special commandment ? A. Of the tree of knowledge of good and '^evil thou shalt not eat ; for in the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt dye the death.— ^ Gen. 2. 17. A SHORT CATECHISME. 7 1 Q. Death, we heare, was threatened if he disobeyed ; what promise was made to encourage him to his dutie ? A. The ® continuance both of himself and his posteritie in that good estate. — ^Gen. 2. 9. Q. Did man continue in that good estate ? A. No ; but he fell from ^God through the enticement of Satan.— n Tim. 2. 14. Q. Hmv did he fall ? A. By sinning wilfully ^against God, ^transgressing his law. SfEccles. 7. 29 or 31 ; Rom. 5. 12 ; Til John 3. 4. Q. What was the sinne he did commit ? A. The eating of the ^forbidden fruit. — ^Gen. 3. 6. Q. Did all mankind sinne in Adam 2 A. Yes ; '^for we were all in his loynes. fc Rom. 5. 12 ; 1 Cor. 15. 22 ; Heb. 7. 9, 10. Q. What is the state of all men by reason of Adam's fall / A. They are dead in ^sin, and bondslaves of Satan. — ^Eph. 2. 1, 2. Q. How doth that appeare ? A. In that they are altogether °^ unable to good, and "prone to evil continually. m 2 Cor. 3. 5 ; wGen. 8. 21. Q. WJiat fruits doe proceed from this originall corruption ? A. Evill ° thoughts, words, and Pworkes. oGen. 6. 5; pGnl. 5. 19. Q. Are all the actions of naturcdl men evill continually ? A. Yes ; for they ^fayle in many things, and therefore as they come from them, they are ^odious unto God. QMatt. 12. 35; rProv. 28. 9. Q. What punishments are due unto man by reason of those sinnes ? A. All woe ^and misery, temporal, spirituall, and eternall. sLam. 3. 39; Rom. 6. 23 ; Gal. 3. 10. Q. What are the temporall miseries ? A. God's *curse upon the creatures, on "man's body, senses, name, friends, whatsoever he takes in hand, and death ^ itself. iRom. 8. 20; ?? Deut. 28. 15, 16, etc.; wRom.C. 21. 72 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What are the spirituall miseries 2 A. Blindnesse of '^minde, the spirit of ^slumber and giddiness, horrour of ^conscience, hardnesse of * heart, a reprobate ^ sense, and strong ^delusions. icEsa. 6. 9 ; 3/ Rom. 11. 8 ; a Matt. 27. 3, 4, 5 ; a Exod. 7. 3 ; 6 Rom. 1. 28 ; c 2 Thess. 2. 11. Q. What is the eternall misery ? A. Everlasting *^damnation. — ^Eom. 6. 23. Q. After a man doth know his misery, what is he to learn in the next place ? A. The true means how he may escape the foresaid ® misery, and be restored to %appinesse. « Acts 2. 37 ; /Acts 16. 30. Q. By what means may we escape this misery and recover Jmppi- nesse ? A. Onely by ^ Jesus Christ.— ^ Acts 4. 12. Q. What is Jesus Christ ? A. The eternal Son ^of God, who in time became man for his elect. — ^Gal. 4. 4, 5. Q. How many things are we to consider in Christ ? A. His ^person and his '^office. i Col. 2. 9 ; fc Heb. 2. 16, 17. Q. What is his person ? A. It is ^God and man united together into one "^person. Z John 1. 14 ; Rom. 9. 5 ; Esay 7. 14 ; ml Cor. 8. 6. Q. Being God before all time, how could he be made man ? A. He was conceived by the "Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary according to the ^Prophets. nLuke 1. 35 ; oGen. 8. 15 ; Esay 7. 14, and 11. 1. Q. Why was Christ conceived by the Holy Ghost ? A. That he might be pure, p without sinne, wherewith all are stained that are conceived after the ordinary ^manner. p Luke 1. 45 ; g John 2. 6. Q. Why was he God ? A. That he might beare the weight of God's wrath, without sinking under it, overcome death, be the Head of the Church, repaire his image in us, conquer the enemies of our salvation, and defend us against them. A SHORT CATECHISME. 73 Q. IFhy was he man ? A. That he might suffer death ""for us, sanctifie our ^nature, and we might have accesse with ^boldnesse to the throne of grace. rHeb. 2. 14; sHeb. 2. 11 ; fHeb. 4. 15, 16. Q. What is his office ? A. To be a mediator to ^reconcile God and man. — " 1 Tim. 2.5. Q. How did lie that ? A. By his fulfilling ^the law and by his ^sufferings. wMat. 3. 15 ; a;Heb. 9. 15 ; Rom. 5. 10, 12, 13. Q. What understand you by his suffering ? A. His voluntarie ^humiliation both in ^soule and bodie, his ^crucifying, death and ^buriall, and abiding ^ under the dominion of death for a time. 2/PhU. 2. 5, 6, 7, 8 ; sEsay 53. 10 ; Matth. 26. 38 ; Heb. 9. 14 ; a Luke 23. 33 ; & 1 Cor. 15. 3, 4; c Acts 2. 27. Q. Did Christ alwayes abide under the power and dominion of death ? A. No : for the power of death being ^subdued, the third *^day he rose again, ascended ^into heaven, and sitteth at the right hand of the Father. ' d Acts 2. 31 ; el Cor. 15. 3. 4 ; /Marke 16. 19. Q. What are the speciall parts of Christ's mediatorship ? A He is ^Prophet, ^Priest, and ^King. g Acts 3. 22 ; A Heb. 2. 17 ; iPsal. 110. 1. Q. Why was Christ a Prophet ? A. To reveale unto us the way to ^ everlasting life. — •^Luke 4. 18. 19. Q. Why was he a Priest ? A. To purchase for us ^righteousnesse and life eternall. — »Heb. 5. 9. Q. What are the functions of his priestly office ? A. "^Offering up himself a sacrifice once for all, and making I request for us. m Heb. 5. 1, and 9. 6, and 7. 25. 74 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. TFhy was Christ a King ? A. To bridle and "subdue all his enemies; but to ^gather and Pgoverne his elect and chosen. nCol. 2. 14 ; Psal. 110. 1, 2 ; 1 Corin. 15. 28 ; o John 19. 16 ; Hag. 2. 7 ; p Ezek. 34. 23, 24. ' Q. What benefit do we receive by the death and resurrection of Christ ? A. We are redeemed from the *^ guilt, punishment, and ^poAver of sin, and shall be raised ^up at the last day. 9 Gal. 3. 13 ; Col. 1. 14; rLuke 1. 74 ; Titus 2. 14 ; si Cor. 15. 13. Q. How are toe redeemed from the guilt and punishment of sin ? A. God the Father accepting the death of Christ as a full ^ransome and satisfaction to his justice, doth freely discharge and acquit us from all our sins. t Rom. 2. 24, 25 ; Col, 1. 14. Q. Hon) are we redeemed from the power and tyrannie of sinne ? A. Christ by his death killeth ^sin in us, and by his resur- rection doth quicken us to newnesse of life. — ^Eom. 6. 3, 4. Q. What are the benefits of Christ's ascension and sitting at the right hand of the Father ? A. The leading of "captivity captive, the giving of gifts unto men, the pouring^ of his Spirit upon his people, and the pre- paring ^ a place for them. riEph. 4. 11 ; a; Acts 2. 16, 17 ; i/ John 14. 3. Q. What are the benefits of his intercession ? A. The persons of the faithful do alwayes remain just, and their works acceptable in the sight of God; hereby also they are defended against the accusations of all their enemies. z 1 Pet. 2. 5 ; Gen. 4. 4 ; Exod. 28. 38. Q. How will the knoioJedge of these things work in the heart of him whom God will save ? A. It brings him to a serious consideration^ of his own estate, to grieve for sin and the fear of God's ^displeasure whereby the heart is broken and humbled. a Jer. 8. 6, 7 ; Luke 15. 17 ; h Acts 2. 37 ; c Acts 9. 6. Q. What else will this knowledge worke ? A. It will bring a man to confesse his *^ sinne, highly to ® prize Christ and hunger ^ after him untill he obtaine his desire. dLuke 15. 18; eMatt. 13. 44 ; /Esa. 55. 1 ; John 7. 37. A SHORT CATECHISME. < 5 Q. How are v:e made ])avtakers of Christ icith all his benefits / A. By faith ^ alone. 9 John 3. 16, and 1. 12 ; Acts 13. 29. Q. JVlmt is faith? A. A resting upon Christ ^^ alone for salvation. h Psal. 2. 12 ; Acts 16. 21. Q. What is the ground of faith ? A. The free promises^ of God made in Christ, concerning the forgivenesse of sinnes, and eternall righteousnesse. iRom. 4. 18; Heb. 11. 11. Q. How is faith wrought in us .? A. Inwardly by the Spirit as the '^author ; and outwardly by the ^preaching of the word and ™ catechising as the instrument thereof fcActs 16. 14; I'Rom. 10. 14; mHeb. 5. 11, 12, and 6. 2. Q. How doth the word works faith in us ? A. By shewing us our "misery, and th^ true meanes of *^our recovery, encouraging p us being humbled, to receive the pro- mises of the gospel. nRom. 7. 7 ; Gal. 3. 23 ; oGal. 4. 4, 5 ; i?Matth. 11. 28 ; Esar 61. 1, 2, 3 ; Eevel. 22. 17. Q. Hoiv doth the Spirit worke by the word .? A. It doth teach us msdome to apply ^things, generally spoken, particularly to ourselves, secretly upholdeth ^against despaire, stirreth up in us good ^desires, doth soften *the heart "and draw us to rest upon Christ for salvation, before we have ^'the feeling of comfort. q Ezek. 36. 27, 31 ; r Psal. 51. 12 ; s PhU. 2. 13 ; t Ezek. 11. 19, and 36. 36 ; u John 6. 44 ; «' Matt. 11. 28, 29. Q. By ichat meanes is faith increased ? A. By hearing the same ^word preached and catechised, and likewise by ^^ earnest prayer. x\ Pet. 2. 2; i/ Luke 17. 5. Q. How must we hear that we may get profit ^ A. With ^reverence, ^meekness, ^joy, ^a longing desire to learne, and giving^ credit to the truth. arEsa. 66, 2, 5; « Jam. 1. 21 ; ?jMat. 13. 44; cl Pet. 2. 2 ; dHeb. 4. 1. 2. 76 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. How else ? A. "We must meditate ®of that wee heare, apply it to our- selves, conferre *of it with others, and with ^diligence set about the practice of what is required. e Psalm 1. 2, and 119. 14, 15 ; /John 4. 53 ; gr Esay 2. 3 ; Lnke 2. 15. Q. What is prayer ? A. It is a calling upon God, in the name of Christ, with the ^ heart, and sometimes with the voice, according to his will, for ourselves and ^others. h Exod. 14. 15 ; 1 Sam. 1. 13 ; i 1 John 5. 14. Q. To whom must we pray ? A. To God alone, in the name^^ of Christ. — ^John 16. 23. Q. Ought we not in prayer to make particular confession of our sinnes ? A. Yea; so farre as we can ^come to the knowledge of them ; and this we must do with "^griefe, hatred, and shame, freely "accusing and condemning ourselves before God with broken and ° contrite hearts. 1 Sam. 12. 19 ; Psal. 19. 12 ; mXeh. 6. 11 ; TiNeh. 9. 33 ; oZach. 12. 10. Q. What are the parts of 'prayer ? A. Petition and thanksgiving. Q. What is Petition ? A. It is a prayer, wherein we desire the p preventing or '1 removing of things hurtfull, and the obtaining of things need- ful either for this life or for that which is to come. ijEsay 37. 20 ; Matt. 6. 13 ; 5 Psal. 6. 1, 2, 3, 4. Q. Hoio must we make our requests that toe may he heard ? A. With ^understanding, feeling of our^ wants, *^ fervency, "reverence, hope^^ to speed, and '^love. rl Cor. 14. 15; sMatt. 11. 28; tJam. 5. 16, 17; wEccles. 5. 2 ; u-1 Tim. 2. 8; xMat. 6. 14; Mat. 11.25. Q. What is thanksgiving ? A. It is Sprayer, wherein we render ^thanks to God for his generall goodnesse and particular ^favours. 1/1 Sam. 2. 5; zFsal. 136. 1, etc; a Psal. 103. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. A SHORT CATECHISME. 77 Q. JFhat things are required, in tlmnksgiving ? A. Love to ^God and joy in ^his mercy, a desire to ^draw others to obey and glorifie God, and an endeavour ®to proceed in godlinesse ourselves. fcPsaL 18. 1, 2 ; c Psal. 126. 1, 2 ; dPsal. 34. 11 ; e Dent. 6. 10, 11, 12, 13. Q. JFJuit rule of direction is there accoi'ding to which v:e ought to frame our prayers ? A. The generall direction is the word of God, the more speciall is the Lord's Prayer. Q. Hon: many things are to he considered in the Lord's Prayer ? A. Three ; the preface, the prayer itself, and the conclusion. Q. What is the p-eface ? A. Our Father which art in heaven. Q. What learn you out of this j/reface ? A. That God is our Father by grace and adoption, through Jesus Christ, glorious in majesty and infinite in power, that both can and hath promised to help us. Q., What are you to consider in tlie prayer itself e i A. Six petitions and a thanksgiving. Q. Which is the first 'petition ? A. Hallowed be thy name. Q. What desire you of God in this petition ? A. That God's infinite excellency may be magnified by us on earth in heart, word, and deed. Q. JFJiich is ths second petition ? A. Thy kingdome come. Q. WJuit doe you desire of God in this petition ? A. That Christ would convert such as be under the power of Satan ; rule in the hearts of his chosen by his Spirit here, and perfect their salvation in heaven hereafter. Q. Which is the third ptetition ? A. Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven. 78 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What desire you of God in this petition .? A. That whatsoever God willeth in his word, might be obeyed chearefully, speedily, faithfully, and constantly by men on earth as the angels do in heaven. Q. JFhich is the fourth petition ? A. Give us this day our daily bread. Q. What desire you of God in this petition ? A. That God would bestow on ns all things necessarie for this life ; as good maintenance, etc. Q. Which is the fift petition ? A. And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them that trespasse against us. Q. What desire you of God in this petition ? A. That God in his free mercy in Jesus Christ would fully pardon all our sinnes as we do pardon the wrongs and injuries we receive from others. Q. Which is the sixt petition ? A. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Q. What desire you of God in this petition ? A. To be freed from trials so farre as it may stand with the good pleasure of God, and alwayes to be delivered from the evil thereof, that we faint not under them or be foiled by them. Q. Which is the thanksgiving in the Lord's prayer ? A. For thine is the kingdome, the power and the glory for ever and ever. Q. Do not these ivords containe a reason also ichy we beg the former blessings at the hand of God ? A. Yes ; for seeing the kingdom, power, and glory is the Lord's, we should call upon him in all our necessities ] Q. Which is the conclusion of the Lord's prayer ? A. Amen, which is a witnessing of our faith, and desire of the things prayed for. Q. What doth Amen signifie ? A. So it is, or so be it. A SHORT CATECHISME. 79 Q. What must we do after we have prayed ? A. Observe how we speed, and what answer we ^receive. — ^Psal. 3. 4, and 85. 8. Q. What benefit shall we gain therehj ? A. It will stirre up the heart to ^thankfulnesse, remove dulnesse^ and negligence in this dutie, strengthen our ^faith and inflame our hearts with zeal, joy, and love. SrPsal. 31. 21, 22; 7iPsal. 88. 13, and 4. 1, 2; iPsal. 4. 3 ; fcPsal. 116. 1; Psal. 28. 6, 7. Q. What must ive do if God answer us not at the first or second time ? A. Examine how Hve pray, and continue ™ fervent therein, waiting upon "the Lord until we speed. I James 4. 3 ; to Luke 18. 1 ; « Hab. 2. 3 ; Psal. 5. 3. Q. Who ought to pray ? A. Though God require it of all men upon earth, yet it more especially belongeth to the members ° of the church militant. — ^'Matt. 7. 7, 8. Q. Who can and may pray with hope to speed ? A. Onely they that depart Pfrom iniquity. — PPsal. 66. 18. Q. For whom must we pray ? A. For all sorts of men now ^living, or that shall live ''there- after, but ^not for the dead. ql Tim. 2. 1, 2; r John 17. 20; sLuke 16. 24, 25. Q. May men content themselves to pray in private onely, or onely in publike ? A. No ; but they must use both *publicke and "private prayer. iActs 2. 42; ■itLuke 11. 1. Q. What other means hath God appointed to increase faith ? A. The due administration and ^receiving of the sacraments. wGen. 17. 9, 10, 11 ; Rom. 4. 11. Q. Who ought to administer the sacraments ? A. Onely they that are ^lawfully called thereunto by the church. — ^Heb. 5. 4. Q. What is a sacrament ? A. A scale of the ^^ covenant of grace. — ^Rom. 4. 11. 80 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. In what words is the covenant expressed in Scripture ? A. I will be thy God, and thou shalt be my people. — Jer. 31. 33. Q. What are the parts of a Sacrament ? A. Two ; an outward visible signe sanctified to represent and seal another thing to the minde and heart, and an inward grace which is the thing signified. Q. Who is the author of the Sacrament ? A. The Lord ^onely who made the covenant. — ^Esa. 7. 14, and 38. 7. Q. How many sacraments are there ? A. Two; ^Baptisme and the ^Lord's Supper. a John 1. 26 ; b Luke 22. 19, 20. Q. What is baptisme ? A. A sacrament of our *^ ingrafting into Christ, communion with him and entrance into the Church. c Matt. 28. 19 ; Acts 8. 28. Q. What is the outivard signe ? A. Water, '^wherewith the party baptized is washed ®by dipping or sprinkling in the name ^of the Father, Sonne, and Holy Ghost. (Z Acts 10. 47 ; eMatt. 3. 6, 11, 13, 16 ; Acts 16. 15 ; /Matt. 28. 19. Q. What is the inward grace or thing signified ? A. Forgivenesse of ^sinnes and ^sanctification. /Mark 1. 4 ; Acts 2. 38 ; g Tit. 3. 5. Q. To tuhat conditions doth the p)arty baptized binde himself ? A. To believe in ^Christ and ^forsake his sinne. 7/ Acts 8. 37; i Matt. 3. 12. Q. How oft ought a man to be baptized ? ^. It is enough ^once to be baptized, for baptisme is a pledge 'of our new birth. k Acts 7. 8 ; I Tit. 3. 5. Q. Who ought to be baptized ? A. Infidels "^converted to tlie faith, and tlie infants of *^one or both Christian parents. VI Acts 8. 12 ; n Acts 2. 39 : 1 Cor. 7. 14. A SHORT CATECHISME. 81 Q. Wliat is the Lord's Supper ? A. A sacrament of our * continuance and growth in Christ. — n Cor. 10. 16. Q. Who is the author of this sacrament 7 A. The ^Lord Jesus in the same night that he was betrayed. — bl Cor. 11. 23, 24. Q. What is the outward signe ? ! A. Bread ^ and wine, with the actions pertaining to them, as breaking, giving, receiving, eating, and drinking. — ^Matt. 26. 27, 28. I Q. What is the inward grace ? I A. Christ^ with aU the benefits of his death and passion. — i^l Cor. n. 24. Q. What is the duty of the rainister in the administration of this sacrament ? A. To consecrate® it by declaring the institution thereof and prayer joyned wath thanksgiving ; as also to breake the bread and afterwards to deliver the bread and wine to the people. . el Cor. 11. 23, 24 ; Matt. 26. 26, 27, 28 ; Mark 14. 22 ; Luke 22. 19. . Q. What is hereby signified ? A. The action of God the Father offering Christ to all, and )estowing him ^effectually upon the worthy receiver. — ^1 Cor. LO. 16. Q. What is the dutie of the receivers ? A. To receive^ the bread and wine delivered, and to eat and irink thereof. g Matt. 26. 26, 27 ; 1 Cor. 11. 23, 24. Q. What is signified hereby ? A. Our ^receiving and feeding upon Christ by faith. — ^1 Cor. 0. 16. Q. Is it sufficient to receive the sacrament once ? A. No; ^but we must receive it often. — ^Acts 2, 42, and 20. 7. Q. For what end and use ought ice to receive this sacrament ? 1 A. To ^confirme our faith, communion with Christ, and all ving graces in us, to keepe' in remembrance the Lord's death itill he come againe, and to testify ™our love one to another. ;cl Cor. 10. 16 ; n Cor. 11. 24, 26; ml Cor. 12. 13. F 82 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What is the danger of unworthy receiving 1 A. Unworthy receivers are guilty of the body and blood of the Lord, and do eat and drinke judgement to themselves. — 1 Cor. 11. 27, 29. Q. Who are to receive this sacrament ? A. Such as know their "misery by sin, the remedy thereof in Christ, and the ^doctrine of the sacrament, withall earnestly Plonging to be satisfied with the bread of life. tiMatt. 11. 28; oExod. 12. 26, 27 : pRev. 22. 17. Q. Wliat else is required in them that come to this table ? A. A renewed ^hatred of all sinne, an hearty endeavour to overcome naturall passions, an utter and well-advised forsaking of ""grosse sins, willingnesse^ to be strengthened in faith, and a * longing desire for the good of our brethren. f^Luke 3. 12, 13; Matt. 18. 3; rLuke 14. 28, 29, etc. ; sMatt. 5. 6; fMark 11. 25; Matt. 5. 23, 24. Q. What if a man finde himselfe weake in faith and full of doubting ? A. He must bewaile "his unbeleefe, pray for faith, seeke to have his doubts resolved, and so receive to be further ^strengthened. 11 Mark 9. 24 ; «; Judg. 6. 36, 37 ; Exod. 12. 1. 2, 3, 4. Q. Hoiv ought a mans heart to be affected in receiving the sacrament? A. With ^reverence, joy, and ^comfort, meditating 'on the outward signes and what they signifie, the dainties prepared, and love of him that prepared them, our communion with Christ, his graces and faithfuU people whereby the heart is prepared to thanksgiving. g Exod. 3. 5 ; Gen. 28. 17 ; /iDcut. 16. 15 ; il Cor. 11. 25 ; 1 Kings 8. 66. Q. What must we do after we have received 1 A. We must endeavour to find an encrease of '^ faith, love, and all saving graces, abounding more and more in well-doing. fcProv. 4. 18; Ezck. 47. 12. Q. What cn'der Imth the Lord left in Jiis Church to keepe his ordi- nances from contempt ? A. The unruly should be 'admonished, the obstinate /"ex- communicated, and the penitent after their fall restored and "comforted. 1 1 Tlics. 5. 14 ; m 1 Cor. 5.5; n 2 Cor. 2. 6, 7. A SHORT CATECHISME. 83 Q. Besides the forenamed meanes, are tJiere not some other profit- able for the increase of faith ? A. Yes ; ^'reading or hearing the Scriptures read in Ppubliqne and in '^ private, '"meditation and ^conference. oRev. 1. 3 ; 7) Acts 13. 15 ; 5 Acts 8. 30 ; rLuke 2. 51 ; illeb. 3. 13 ; John 4. 52. Q. Hitherto of the ordinary meanes whereby faith is encreased ; Be there not also some extram'dinary meanes ? A. Yes ; and those be holy ^fasting, holy ^feasting and religious *^vowes. a Luke 5. 35 ; ?> Esther 9. 17 c Psal. 50. 14. Q. What is an holy fast ? A. A religious <*abstinence from all the labours'^ of our calling and comforts^ of life, so farre as comelinesse and necessity will permit, that wee might bee more^'seriously ^ humbled before God, and more fervent in prayer. d Esther 4. 16 ; e Lev. 23. 28 ; /Exod. 35. 5 ; g- Dan. 9. 9, 11 ; Levit. 23. 27. Q. When ought we to fast ? A. When we feele or ^fear some grievous calamity upon us or hanging over our heads, want some speciall blessing, are pressed with some speciall sinne, or goe about some Hveighty matter. h Esther 4. 16 ; Ezra 8. 21 ; i Acts 13. 2. Q. What is an holy feast ? A. An extraordinary '^thanksgiving for some notable de- liverance out of some desperate danger, testified with feasting before God, with joy and gladnesse, sending presents to our friends and ^portions to the needy. jfcl Chr. 16. 8, and 29. 10, 11 ; ZXeh. 8. 10 ; Esther 9. 22. Q. What is a religious vow ? A. A solemne ™ promise unto God made by a fit person of some lawful thing which is in his choice, to testifie his °love and thankfulnesse. mDeut. 23. 21, 22 ; n Psal. 116. 12. Q. Can faith being wrought and confirmed in us be fruitlesse and unprofitable ? ^. No; for it worketh by ''love. — °Gal. 5. 6. Q. What is the principall work of faith 1 A. It purifieth the heart. — Acts 15. 9. 84 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. JVhat follow eth thereupon ? A. A fighting and combating against sinne and corruption. — Gal. 5. 17. Q. What else 'i A. RestrainingP of all evill in affection and of grosse ^sinne in life and conversation. pActs 2. 38; gActs 19. 18, 19. Q. What is a third thing that followefh hence ? A. Love"" and delight in that which is good, joyned with a sincere desire, purpose, and endeavour, ^ daily to amend whatso- ever is amisse, and to lead a life* according to the law of God. rPsal. 119. 97 ; sPhil. 3. 13, 14 ; Acts 11. 23 ; iPsal. 119. 6. Q. Wherein is the summe of the law contained ? A. In the ten Commandments. — Deut. 10. 4. Q. How are they divided ? A. Into two Tables.— Deut. 5. 22, and 10. 1, 2. Q. Which are the commandments of the first table ? A. The four first, and they teach the duty which we owe unto God immediately. Q. Which are the commandments of the second table ? A. The six last, which instruct us in our duty towards our neighbour. Q. Which is the first Commandment ? A. I am the Lord thy God, etc.. Thou shalt have, etc. Q. Which is the generall duty required in this commandment ? A. That in minde, will, affections, and the effects of these, we take the true God in Christ to be our God. Q. What is the generall sin here forbidden 7 A. All failing to give God that foresaid honour which is due unto him, or else in whole or in part giving it to any other. Q. What is the second Commandment ? A. Thou shalt not make thyself, etc. Q. What is the generall duty which this commandement requireth ? A. That we doe worship the true God purely according to liis will. A SHORT CATECHISME. 85 Q. What is the generall sin forbidden ? A. All omission of God's true worship when it is required, and all false worship either invented by others or taken up of our own heads. Q. Which is the third Commandement ? A. Thou shalt not take the name, etc. Q. What is the generall duty required in this commandement ? A. That we should use the titles, properties, workes, and ordinances of the Lord, with knowledge, faith, reverence, joy, and sincerity in thought, word, and conversation. Q. What is the generall sin forbidden ? A. Omitting the duty here required, using the Lord's name when we ought not, or otherwise than we should. Q. When is the name of God taken otherwise then it should ? A. When it is used ignorantly, superstitiously, without faith, rashly, not to a right end, hypocritically, falsly against con- science, and when men name themselves Christians but live scandalously. Q. Which is the fourth Commandement 1 A. Eemember the Sabbath day, etc. Q, What is the generall duty here required ? A. That the whole Sabbath or Lord's day be set apart from all common uses as holy to the Lord both publikely and privately in the practice of the duties of necessity, holinesse, and mercy. Q. What is the generall sin here forbidden ? A. All neglecting of the duties of that time, or prophaning of that day by needlesse works, words, or thoughts about our callings or recreation. Q. Which day is to be set apart as holy to the Lord ? A. It is morall and perpetuall to keepe one day in seven as holy : from the creation to the resurrection of Christ the seventh day was instituted; after Christ his resurrection the first day of the weeke was ordained, and is to be kept for ever. 86 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What is the fifth Commandement ? A. Honour thy father and thy mother, etc. Q. Who are to he understood hy father and mother .? A. Not onely naturall parents, but also all superiours in office, age, and gifts. Q. What is it to honour ? A. To acknowledge the excellency that is in men by vertue of their place, and to carry ourselves accordingly towards them. Q. Are onely the duties of inferiors here intended ? A. No ; but of superiours and equals also. Q. What then is the maine duty of this Commandement ? A. That we carefully observe that order which God hath appointed amongst men, and doe the duties which wee owe unto them in respect of their places and degrees. Q. What is the duty of inferiours ? A. They must be subject, reverent, and thankfull to their superiours, bearing with their wants and covering them in love. Q. What is the duty of superiours ? A. To carry themselves gravely, meekly, and after a seemly manner towards their inferiours. Q. What is the duty of equals ? A. To regard the dignitie and worth each of other, modestly to beare themselves one toward the other, and in giving honour to go one before another. Q. Which is the sixth Commandement ? A. Thou shalt doe no murther. Q. What is the generall duty of this commandement ? A. That by all meanes lawfull we desire and study to preserve our own person and the person of our neighbour. Q. What is the generall sin herein forbidden ? A. All neglect of our own or our neighbour's preservation, or desire of our own or their hurt, conceived in heart, or declared in word, gesture, or deed. A SHORT CATECHISME. 87 Q. JVhich is the seventh Commandment ? A. Thou shalt not commit adultery. Q. TFhat is the generall dutie of the Commandement ? A. That we should keep ourselves pure in soule and body- both towards ourselves and others. Q. TVluit is the generall sin here forbidden ? A. All uncleannesse of heart, speech, gesture, or action, together with all the causes, occasions, and signes thereof. Q. JVhich is the eighth Commandement ? A. Thou shalt not steal. Q. What is the generall duty of this Commandement ? A. That by all good meanes we further the outward estate of ourselves and of our neighbours. Q. What is the generall sin forbidden ? A. All neglect to further our owne or our neighbour's wealth, all impeachment or hinderance thereof, and all increase thereof by unjust and indirect dealing. Q. Which is the ninth Commandement 1 A. Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbour. Q. What is the genercdl duty here required .? A. That by all meanes we seek to maintain our owne and our neighbour's good name according to truth and a good con- science. Q. What is the generall sinne forbidden ? A. All failing to procure, defend, and further our owne and our neighbour's credit, all unjust defence, wrongful suspition and accusation of ourselves and others. Q. What is the tenth Commandement ? A. Thou shalt not covet, etc. Q. What is the genercdl duty commanded ? A. That we be truly contented with our own outward condi- tion, and heartily desire the good of our neighbour in all things belonging unto him great arid small. 88 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What is the generall sin forbidden ? A. All thoughts of minde, wishes, and desires of heart, and delightfull remembrances of evill against contentednesse. Q. Is any man able to keepe this Law ? A. Not perfectly, for the * godly often fall, the most holy ^faile alwayes in their best duties, but the child of God ought,^ may, and usually^ doth walk according to the law sincerely. a Jam. 3. 2 ; & Exod. 28. 36, 37, 38 ; c 1 John 2. 14 ; John 14. 15, 23 ; d 1 Kings 15. 5. Q. ShovM not a Christian omit doing of good altogether, seeing he cannot do it in the measure that God requireth ? A. No ; but with diligence and ^singlenesse of heart strive against corruption, look for ^the assistance of God's Spirit, and labour to^^ grow in grace. c 2 Cor. 7. 1 ; /2 Chron. 16. 9 ; Phil. 4.13; gl Pet. 2. 2, and 2 Pet. 3. 18. Q, What meanes shoidd a man use to grow in grace ? A. He must throughly ^examine his wayes, judge* himselfe, watch^ over his heart at all times, in all places, occasions, and conditions, redeeming the Hime to store his heart with good and preserve"^ his faith. h Hag. 1. 5, 7 ; i\ Cor. 11. 31 ; fc 2 Tim. 4. 5 ; Z Eph. 5. 16 ; m Heb. 10. 35, 36, 38. Q. What else ? A. He must take unto^ him the whole armour of God, and with care, uprightnes, and constancy use the meanes of °grace before prescribed in one estate p as well as in another. «Eph. 6. 14 ; oProv. 2. 3, 4 ; Col. 4. 2 ; p Job 27. 10. Q. What jpriviledges doth God afford in this life unto his children who labour according to his will to increase in grace ? A. They may be assured^ of his favour and fatherly ^care over them, the ^direction of his Spirit, their ^growth in grace and "perseverance to the end. q\ John 3. 1, 13 ; John 1. 12 ; r\ Tim. 4. 10 ; Matt. 10. 30 ; s Psalm 143. 10 ; t Col. 1. 9, 10, 11 ; u Phil. 1. 6. Q. What other privileges doth God afford unto them ? A. They are "kept from, comforted^ in, and delivered^ out of many troubles, taught to use^ all estates aright, ^preserved from foule offences, enabled to *rise againe if they fall, instructed to live ^godly, and have possession ^of the word. ttPsal. 32. 10; ^/;Acts 16. 25; xProv. 11. 8: yLam. 3. 27; Phil. 4. 12; Luke 1. 6; zPsal. 37. 23, 24 ; a Eph. 2. 10 ; ?>Luke 1. 15. A SHORT CATECHISME. 89 Q. Do all the godly or any at all times enjoy all these piviledges? A. No ; some are ignorant of them, not believing, or at least very faintly, that there be any such ; others are carelesse who prize them not, and so take not pains for these things as they ought. Q. TVhat other hindrances do deprive Christians of the enjoying of tJiese priviledges ? A. Inordinate *^passions, as fear, anger, selfe-love, pride, love of pleasures, cares of the world, earthly incumbrances, and in- constancy in good duties ; temptations also to distrust do keep under many. — "^Jam. 4. 1,2. Q. How should a man bridle and reforme these unruly passions ? A. Let him highly esteem a Christian life, pray earnestly, set himselfe most against the infirmities that be strongest in him, shun the occasion of sinne, hide the "^commandements in his heart, and ^ apply the death of Christ for the killing of cor- ruption. mPsal. 119. 11 ; Til Joh. 5. 4. Q. Hoio may a man overcome his temptations to distrust 1 A. He must not give credit to° Satan's suggestions against God's truth, but consider of God's Ppower, ^^goodnesse, ^un- changeablenesse, former ^mercies and free * grace in giving us his Son, so that weaknesse, unworthinesse, want of feeling comfort should not dismay him. oMatt. 4.3, 4; pMatt. 8. 2; Esa. 40. 27, 28; gPsaL 51. 1; rJer. 31. 3 ; sPsal. 77. 11, 12; tRom. 5. 8,9. Q. Whoi else must he doe ? A. He must consider what promises the Lord hath made to keep ^and uphold him, what encouragement ^he hath given him to believe, and how acceptable ^a thing it is that he should do so. u Matt. 16. 18 ; Luke 22. 32 ; w 1 John 3. 23 ; x Matt. 8. 10, and 15. 28 ; Rom. 4. 20. Q. What other thing is to be learned for the overcoming of these tentations ? A.^ We must judge of ourselves not by our own ^present feel- ing, or by our own ^^ discerning the fruits of grace, but by that we have^ felt, and the *^ fruits of grace which appear to others. oPsal. 116. 11 ; Psal. 13. 1 ; &Psal. 51. 10 ; c Psal. 77. 11 ; d2 Cor. 1. 10, 11. 90 A SHORT CATECHISME. Q. What may he a further help ? ^. It is good to ® examine our hearts and use the advice of ^others, but we must know withall the groaning ^after and labouring to rest our wearied soulupon the promises of grace, — being never satisfied untill our doubtfulness be removed — will bring a good end. e Psal. 4. 4 ; /I Thes. 5. 14 ; gr Matt. 11. 28. Q. Do the fruits of the Spirit alwayes appear in the faithfull 1 A. No; they are obscured in ^our first conversion, in the daies of security, when we^ leave our first love, in the time of Hemptation, or of some relapse °^into sin. TiLuke 5. 37, 38; il Cor. 3. 1; A; Rev. 2. 4; Z Psal. 6. 1, 2, 3 ; ??iPsal. 51. 10. Q. Hoiv should a man recover out of a relapse ? A. By a speedy "consideration of what he hath done, re- newing his repentance with sorrow and shame, ° bewailing his sinne before God, reforming his life, and laying hold upon the promise of mercy. nRev. 2. 5; oJer. 31. 18,19. Q. What priviledges do the godly enjoy as soon as this life is ended ? A. Their glory then begins ; for their bodies remained in the grave as in a bed of spices, and their soules being perfectly freed from sinne are ^received into heaven, beholding ^God and Christ immediately. J) 1 Thes. 4. 15 ; g Rev. 14. 13 ; r Matt. 5. 8 ; 1 Cor. 13. 12. Q. If that he the state of the godly what shall hecome of the ungodly? A. Their bodies ^ shall rot in the grave, and their souls *be judged to everlasting woe. sGen. 3. 19; « Luke 16. 22, 23. Q. When shall the happinesse of the elect he consummate .? A. At the "dreadfull day of judgement and the generall resurrection. — "Psal. 17. 15. Q. Who shall he the judge at that day 1 A. Christ the ^Lord and King of the Church, who shall come in a most glorious and visible maner, descending from '^heaven with a shout, and with the voice of the archangell, and with the trumpet of God, most royally attended ^with innumer- able multitudes of mighty angels. wActs 10. 42, and 17. 21 ; a;l Thess. 4. 16 ; 1/2 Thess. 1. 7. A SHORT CATECHISME. 9 1 Q. When shall He come ? A. He will surely come, but the time is ^unknown, that we might even^ watch and prepare for his coming. 2 Matt. 24. 36; a Matt. 24. 42. Q. Whom shall He judge .? A. His elect and ^chosen, and all their enemies, both evill '^angels and wicked men. 6 2 Cor. 15. 10 ; c2 Pet. 2. 4 ; Jude 16 v. Q. Seeing many of God's elect people, and wicked men are rotted in the earth, how can they he judged ? A. The very same bodies in*^ substance that at any time died, shall by the power of God be raised up and the soules be united unto them, inseparably to abide together for ever more. — •^1 Cor. 15. 42, 43. Q. What are we to believe concerning those who shall he found alive at the coming of Christ ? A. They shall be changed at the ® twinkling of an eye, and so presented before the judgment seat of Christ. — ^1 Cor. 15. 51,52. Q. In what manner shall He judge ? A. Most strictly, both in respect of the ^persons judged and the things for which; but yet hee shall judge most righteous^' judgement. /2Cor. 5. 10; jr Acts 17. 31. Q. What shall he the issue of this judgement to the wicked 1 A. Everlasting ^perdition from the presence of the Lord, to all those who ignorantly or wilfully did contemne the gospel. — ^2 Thess. 1. 7, 8, 9. Q. What shall he the issue thereof to the godly ? A. The clear ^ vision of God and Christ, endlesse communion'^ with them, and everlasting ^ peace and glory both in soule and body, in fuller measure than the heart of man can now com- prehend, or any of the saints enjoyed before. il John 3. 2 ; A; John 17. 24 ; Phil. 1. 23 ; ZMatt. 25. 34. FINIS. A N ENDEAVOVR OF Making the Principles of Chriftian Religion, namely the Creed, the ten Commandements, the LORDS Prayer, and the Sacraments plaine and eafie Tending to the more fpeedy inftrudlion of the meaneft capacities, and weakeft memories. And for the making triall alfo of their underftand- ings, who though they have attained fome meafure of faving knowledge, yet through the weakneiTe of their abihties cannot expreffe even that which they doe conceive. By Herbert Palmer. The fourth Impreffion. The Preface is fpecially to be heeded. Hof. 4. ver, 6. My people are dejiroyed for lack of knowledge. lohn 17. ver. 3. Thh is Ife eternally to knoiv thee the only true Godj and him ivhom thou haji fent., lef-us Chriji. LONDON: Printed for Thomas Vnderhill at the Bible in Woodftreete. 1644. A Direction to the Christian Reader concerning the reason and use of this way of Questions and Answers. Christian Eeader, Thou hast here an endeavour of making the Princij^les of our Christian Eeligion plaine and familiar even to very weak capacities, and easie to be remembered even by very weak memories. How fit it is to perform this, though thy own experience will best inform thee, if thou be pleased to make triall of it toward any thou hast care of, yet thou maist partly coneeive if thou wilt take along with thee the reason of the composition of it in this forme, and the drift aimed at by the Author, which will also direct thee to make right use of it. I. Whereas thou canst not but observe at the first view both a double sort of Answers and a double sort of questions ; That is done because the Author conceives that neither sort alone will suffice to drop in knowledge into narrow mouth'd vessels, for whose sake this labour hath beene undertaken. Experience hath taught him this, and he is willing to teach it thee better cheape. II. For the Answers (to speak of them first), observe in them first their brevity : secondly, their compleatnesse : thirdly, their easinesse. 1. One sort of them are undeniably as briefe as may be ; only Yes or No : and yet even they will be of good use for instruction, but especially for triall. 2. Of the other sort also special care hath been had to make them all as short as may be (considering their compleatnesse), that the weakest memory may not justly complaine of burthen. 2. Then for the compleatnesse of these Answers take notice, I. That they are all framed into entire sentences of themselves, without depending for their sense 96 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINE THE CREED. upon the foregoing questions. Hereby the learner shall have a stock of Divine Truth in his head even though he should forget the questions. And withall, this may help to prevent a common error observable in divers learners; who, when the sense is shared between the question and the answer (as for brevities sake it is usuall), forgetting the question, oft give the Answer, which they have learned by rote, to a wrong question, to the great confounding of their understandings : which cannot so easily be here, where the answer carries even a full sense in it selfe ; besides that, for the most part, it repeats part of the question. 2. These answers, though suiting directly to the first or head-question, of every division, yet also agree fully to every one of the under-questions by joyning but the brief Answer Yes or No, which is placed at the end of the question, and making it the beginning of the larger answer. 3. These answers are also remarkable easie by reason that there is not a word in any of them but hath been before in some of the questions of that division. And so, after the learner is but little used to them, he will soon get the answer as having it altogether, or in parcels, put into his mouth before in the Questions, and after he hath once learned them, he will the easier both understand and remember them upon the rehearsall of the questions again, or even of some of them. III. Now concerning the Questions : First, as there is ever more than one question belonging to the same division and full answer, so ordinarily, and as oft as could be with convenience, the first question is generall, and therefore printed in a different^ character, as the answers also are : And then the following questions are sub-divisions of that into more particulars, so to help to make the meaning of it more plain. Secondly, where ever the nature of the generall question would fairly beare it, and that it could be without multiplying too many questions under one head, the under-questions are by way of disjunction, one crosse to the other. Is it so ? or So ? directing to own the truth by answering Yes, and deny the falshood or falshoods (for oftentimes they are more then one) by saying No. Yet now and then it could not well be avoided, but they must be all 1 Larger, 1640. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINS THE CREED. 97 of one sort, and so the brief answers of that division all Yes or all No. But these are but few if compared with the rest. Thirdly, to every question there is a proper answer fitted. To the head-question the larger answer suits fully ; to the rest the brief Yes or No over against it, besides the light it hath from the larger answer as was noted before, so that, in teaching or examining, any one question may be asked alone, or at the most, borrowing but a word or two out of the foregoing question (which is sometimes left out to spare the trouble of repeating too often the same common and plain words), and even the answering so any one question of a division (if done with understanding and discretion) wil be cleerly so much progresse in the knowledge of divine and saving truth, and lead on fairly to more. Fourthly, the totall number of the head-questions and larger answers amounts not to any great proportion, and so will be sooner learned and easilyer remembered ; and the under- questions and brief answers, though making the volume swell, yet diminish the difficulty both of understanding and memory : and by the advantage of them the author hopes that nothing necessary to be known, by way of foundation or principle, is omitted or left without some clearing. IV. After all, the method and way of teaching these questions and answers to yong beginners may be this : First, read over to them all the questions of a division together without expecting any answer at all from them at the first. Secondly, then go over the severals and see what answer they can now make to the head-question by having heard the under-questions, contain- ing among them the full answer. Thirdly, if they cannot doe this, then try if they can discerne the truth from falshood by answering Yes or No to the under-questions severally. 4. If this yet be too much for them, then teach them those brief answers in order. 5.^ Being perfect in the brief answers of that division (and not before), teach them the larger answer. [6.2 In examining when they have once learned all the answers of a division, ask the head-question twice, namely, first and last, that so the larger answer may ever be made to the Head- question], and so proceed to another question in due season. ^ And last of all, 1640 ^ ^ot in 1640 ed 98 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINS THE CREED. Now the God of all wisdome and grace who hath graciously pro- mised that under the kingdome of Christ the earth shall he filled with the knoivledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea^ and particularly that all our children shall he taught of him :^ vouchsafe for Jesus Chrisfs sake ^[and through him our great Prophet^, his hlessing, as upon all other Tneans used hy any, so upon these weake endeavours of his unworthiest servant, that hy them thou (whoever thou art) that thinkest good to attempt the making use of them maist fo7' thy selfe and thine, finde some help totvard the more easie overcoming the con- ceited, insuperahle difficulty of making those that are not hook learned (as the phrase is) attaine to any measure of understanding in matters of religion, so as hoth thou and they may he hoth more willing and ahle to teach and to learne, untill we all come to the Messed perfection promised, when there shall he no more neede of teaching every man his neighbour omd every man his hr other, ^saying. Know the Lord, hecause all shall know him from the least to the greatest : coming all in the unity of faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God unto a perfect man unto the measure of the stature of the fullnesse of Christ.^ I end with a double suit to thee : One that according to thy knowledge thou be careful to walke humbly, holily, and justly. The other, that receiving any good by this little work thou pay the author (though unknown to thee) by affording him a share in thy prayers ; in which latter he promiseth againe to requite thee whether knowne or unknowne ; as being ever Thine in the Lord Jesus Christ, HERBERT PALMER. 1 Esay 12. 9. 2 Esay 54. 13 ; and through him, our great Prophet, Ed. 1640. •' Omitted here in Ed. 1640. 4 Jer. 31. 34 ; Heb. 8. 16. ^ Ephes. 4. 13. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TENDING TO EXPLAINE THE ARTICLES OF THE CREED {Being Part I. of Palmer's Catechism). Question 1, What is a man's greatest biisinesse in this world ? Is it to follow the world, and live as hee list ? -iN^o. Or Is it to glorifie God and save his own soule ? Yes. 2 Q. Hovj shall a man come to (jlorifie God and save his owne soide ? Can they do so that are ignor- ant? Xo. Or They that do not believe in God ? No. Or Do not serve him ? Ko. Or Must they not needs learn to know God ? and believe in him and serve him ? Yes. Q. Say the Articles of the Be- lief e ? 3 Q. What is it to believe in God ? Is it not first to be persuaded that there is a God ? And Is that enough without trusting in him as my God ? Or Is it enough to trust in him at some time onely ? Or To trust in him and not according to his word ? No. Or Is it to trust in him as my God at all times according to his word? Yes. Yes. 1 A. A man's greatest businesse in this world is to ^ glorifie God and ^save his owne soule. a 1 Cor. 6. 20 and 10. 31. h Mat. 16. 26. 2 A. They that will glorifie God and save their own soules must needs learn to ^know God and ^««^- only so ? No. '^ ^^™- ^- ^ > "^^^^^ ^- ^^• Is he not man too ? true man ? Yes. And so God and man in one person Yes. 55 Q. Why was the Saviour of manJcinde both God and man ? Must it needs be so that hee might suffer and satisfie for the sin of man ? And Because God alone could not suffer, and man alone could not satisfie for sin ? Yes. Yes. 55 A. The Saviour of mankind must needs be both God and man tok suffer and satisfie for the sinne of man. k Heb. 2. 14, 15, 17 ; Heb. 9. 14. 56 Q. Unto what offices was our Saviour Jesus Christ ordained of God, that he might completely save us ? Doth not his name Christ, sig- nifieing^ Anointed, shew him to bee the great Prophet, Priest, and King of his church and people and Lord of all ? And Was he suflSciently fur- nished with abilities for every one of these offices ? Or Did he fail in fulfilling any of them ? 56 A. Christ was ^annointed, that is ordained of God the great m Prophet, n Priest, and oKing of his church, and PLord qof aU. Yes. Yes. No. ZActs 10. 38. 5. 6. oLuke 1. q Acts 10. 3(5. r/iActs 3. 22. 7iHeb. 32, 33. pAets 2. 3(5. 57 Q. How did Jesus Chi-ist be- come man ? Had he a naturall father as hee was man, as all others since our first parents have ? No. Or Was he conceived of the Holy Ghost and born of the Vir- gin Mary ? Yes. 57 A. Jesus Christ was rcon- ceived by the Holy Ghost and borne of the Virgin Mary. rMatt. 1.20,25. Signifying, Ed. 1040. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINE THE CREED. Ill 58 Q. Seeing you smj Jesus Christ was conceived by the Holy Ghost and home of a Virgin,^ what per- fection of nature had he as he was man ? Do you reckon him in the num- ber of sinners and guilty persons? -Vo. Or Was he conceived and born without sinne, though no other children be so ? Yes. Or Did he ever sin all his life- time ? -Vo. And Was he not else like other men, even in naturall infirmities and temptations ? ^"e^- 59 Q. Since Christ was without sin how came he to suffer ? Was it by a tumult of people falling upon him ? i\x). Or By any sicknesse ? 2\^, Or Outward action of mischief e^ lighting on him ? No. Or Was he condemned by any judge? Yes. And, Namely, Pontius Pilate, the governour for the Roman Emperor ? Yes. And Did he believe him to be a guilty person deserving punish- ment ? No. Or Did he know and proclaim him innocent, and yet condemn him ? Yes. 58 A. Jesus Christ was s con- ceived and bornt without sin, and u never sinned in all his life- time, but *else was like other men. sLuke 1. 35. ■ judge the quick and the dead ; even z all mankinde, none ex- cejited. y Acts 10. 41. z 2 Cor. 5. 10. 71 Q. What is the means of partaking of Christ and making him and all his hene^ts ours ? Is faith the onely means ? Yes. Or Is there any other means whereby we can partake of him ? Xo. 72 Q. What is faith ? I mean true, justifying, saving faith ? Is it not to rest on Christ alone for pardon through his death, according to God's offer ? and then for all grace and salvation ? Yes. Or Do they truly and throughly believe the doctrine of Christ who rest not on him ? Or Who rest on any thing^ or 71-4. Faith is the only means whereby we ''»^ partake of Christ, and make him and ball his bene- fits ours. aActs 10.42. ft Acts 26. 18. 72 A. True faith in Christ is to Crest in him alone for l Pet. 1. 4. A CATECHISME, COMPOSED ACCORDING TO THE ORDER OF THE CATECHISME IN THE COMMON PRAYER BOOKE. CONTAINING A BRIEFE EXPOSITION OF I. THE CREED. 11. THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS. III. THE LORD'S PRAYER. IV. THE SACRAMENTS. By M. N., B.D., P.P. THE SECOND EDITION. LONDON: Printed by R. Y. iox J. Boler^ and are to be sold by W. Russell, Book-seller in Plimmouth. 1631. [Bodley Press-mark : 8<^. P. 270. Th.J THE SECOND MAINE PART. THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS. cJam. 2. 18. /Mat. 3. 8. g Heb. 5. 9 ; Rom. 6. 17. h Act. 26. 20. i 2 Cor. 7. 10. k Psal. 51. 4. « Heb. 12. 4. Ill Eph. 4. 27 Q. ZTozf; ma?/ a man come to he assured of his interest in this blessed estate and condition ? A. If he can ^approue the truth and soundnesse of his faith by the fruits of it. Q. What are those fruits of faith hy ivhich the tndh and soundnesse of it may appear e ? A. Chiefly ^repentance and ^new obedience. Q. JFhat is repentance ? A. ^A turning from sin to God. Q. Whence doth this arise ? A. From ^ godly sorrow. Q. What is this godly sorrow ? A. It is a sorrow for sin, whereby the heart of a man is deepely pierced with griefe and remorse, in this respect chiefly, that he hath by his sins •^offended God. Q. What folloiveth hereupon ? A. A continual ^striuing against all sin, and "^auoyding all occasions and tentations that lead thereunto : and this is euer seconded with an endeuour of new obedience. Q. What is this new obedience ? A. A conscionable performance of all such duties as God hath enioyned. And this is the third thing 122 THE TEX COMMANDEMEXTS. o Isa. 8. 20. p Dexi. 5. 22. 1. Com. rt Mat. 4. 10. 7> Deu. 4. 39. c Deut. 10. 20. d Psa. 62. 1. e Deut. 6. 5. /LsayS. 13. that my Godfathers and Godmothers vndertooke for mee, or in my name. Q. Whence haue ice the knowledge of these duties ivhich tve are to loerforme ? A. Out of the '^law of God. Q. JFhat is this law of God ? A. It is the perfect rule of all righteousnesse, contained briefly in the Decalogue, or ten Com- mandements. Q. How are the ten, Commandemenis diuided ? A. Into Ptwo Tables. Q. JFhich are the Commandements contained in the first Table ? A. The foure first, which teach vs our duty to God immediately. Q. JFhich is the first Commandement ? A. Thou shalt haue no other gods but mee. Q. JFhat doth this Commandement require of vs ? A. That we take the true God ^onely for our God. Q. How is this done ? A. By ^knowing and acknowledging him in our iudgements to bee God alone, and entirely ^cleaning to him in our affections. Q. JFhich are those affections hy which we are to cleaue vnto God especialhj ? A. They are specially three. 1. '^ Faith and affiance in him as our onely stay. 2. ®Loue vnto him as our chiefest good. 3. ^ Feare of him as the greatest and most glorious obiect. Q. JFhat are the euils contrary hereunto ? A. They are either in the iudgment or in the affections. THE TEN COMIMANDEMENTS. 123 gPsal. 14. 1. A 2 The. 1. 8. i Hos. 14. 3. k Jeremy 5. 22, 23. iJer. 17. 5. 2. Com. 771 Joh. 4. 24. TiDeute. 12. 30. 32. Act. 2. 41. p Joel 2. 15. q Est. 2. 17. a Tit. 1. 5. ftl Tim. 5. 17 18. 2 Chr. 31. 4. Q. What are the euils in the iudgement against this Commandement ? A. Either §^not acknowledging any God at all, which is Atheisme, or ^not knowing the true God aright, which is grosse ignorance, or ^acknowledging any other to bee God besides him, which is Idol- atrie. Q. What are the euils in the affections ? A. Any ^failing in the affections before mentioned to cleaue vnto the true God, or leaning therein to any other. Q. Which is the second Commandement ? A. Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen image, etc. Q. What is enioijned therein 1 A. That we worship God ^spiritually and purely, according to his owne "direction in his word. Q. What are the chief e j)arts of God's worship which his word prescribes ? A. They are eyther ordinary or extraordinarie. Q. Which are the ordinarie ? A. ° Preaching and hearing of the word, adminis- tring and receiuing of the Sacraments, and Prayer. Q. Which are the extraordinarie ? A. PSolemne fasting, and ^holy feasting, to ex- presse either our humiliation, or our thankefulnesse, according to our speciall and extraordinary occa- sions. Q. Are there any other duties required in this Com- mandement as helpes or meanes to further God's icorship? A. Yes, it is requisite to this end, that *faithfull and able ministers bee ordained and set ouer euery Congregation, and that sufficient ^maintenance, and all due encouragement bee allotted and afforded to them. 124 THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS. cNum. 15. 39. disa. 64. 7. eDeut. 4. 15- 18. * Act. 17. 29. /Isa. 29. 13. fir Pro. 28. 9. /lEzek. 33. 31. 3 Com. iDeut. 28. 58. k 1 Cor. 10. 31. Z Ps. 139. 12. mPsa. 119.46. %Mat. 6. 16. oPs. 10. 13. Mai. 2. 17. :pJoh. 6. 60.