' ' "^^ PRINCETON. N. J. % \ i i Library of Dr. A. A. Hod^e. Presented. z>,»i,»..^,^ .Soa/:s Section Ntanbcr sec 1,,-.- y AN HISTORICAL ENQUIRY, AN HISTORICAL ENQUIRY INTO THE PROBABLE CAUSES OF THE RATIONALIST CHARACTER LATELY PREDOMINANT IN THE ©fieologe of i&txmam* TO WHICH IS PREFIXED, A LETTER FROxM PROFESSOR SACK, UPON THE REV. H. J. ROSE'S DISCOURSES ON GERMAN PROTESTANTISM TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN. BY E. B. PUSEY, M.A. FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE, OXFORD. LONDON: PRINTED FOR C. & J. RIVINGTON, ST. Paul's church-yard, AND WATERLOO-PLACE, PALL-MALL. 1828. TO THE RIGHT REV. FATHER IN GOD CHARLES, LORD BISHOP OF OXFORD, IN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADVANTAGES DERIVED FROM HIS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ASSISTANCE IN THE COURSE OF THEOLOGICAL STUDY, AND FROM THE CONTINUED KINDNESS OF PRIVATE INTERCOURSE, Cfi^ foUoluntg ^f^tm ARE INSCRIBED WITH THE SINCEREST GRATITUDE AND RESPECT. PREFACE. The relation which the following sheets bear to a work, which has in this country met with consi- derable approbation, seems to require that a brief explanation be given of the circumstances in which they originated. Mr. Rose's Essay has un- questionably, through the number of facts which it stated, had the merit of introducing the subject of German Theology more extensively before the English, and of furnishing a considerable number of data, from which the character of the late Ra- tionalist Theology might in itself be appreciated. In the mode, however, in which these facts were presented, the Author missed that arrangement of the facts themselves, through which alone it be- comes possible to trace the connexion of causes and effects through the whole course of the sys- tem described ; as well as a due appreciation of the intrinsic and relative importance of those facts. To some of the innovations a degree of weight seemed to be attached, which their rela^ Vlll PREFACE. tion to the whole compass of the Christian system did not appear to justify : other attempts, which were in themselves justly stigmatized, had either expired as soon as they came into being, or even if they did enjoy a short-lived existence, were, from their nature and the character of their authors, as little entitled to notice, as the ephe- meral and contemptible productions of a Carlile or a Hone. It was indeed almost unavoidable, that, without enquiry in the country itself, mis- takes must frequently be committed as to the real influence of any instrument, whether a lite- rary production or an institution. The Christian Evidence Society in this country has appeared at first sight to foreigners, who knew only its object, but neither the manner in which it was con- ducted, nor the little talent by which it was sup- ported, an engine of some magnitude. Of infi- nitely more importance, however, appeared to be the omission of the history of German Theology previous to the commencement of the crisis de- scribed ; since, in that previous history, the deep- est causes of this crisis must necessarily lie, and without a full knowledge of this, it seemed hope- less to anticipate any satisfactory results. The causes accordingly incidentally assigned in Mr. Rose's work (for his professed object was to give an account of the actual state of Theology, not of PREFACE. ix the causes in which that state originated), seemed partly inadequate to produce so great a revolu- tion, partly of too negative a character to be entitled to the name. The weight in particular ascribed to the neglect of a controlling superin- tendance, and of adherence to the letter of the symbolical books, appeared to confound the with- drawing of what are, at the utmost, but means of prevention, with the introduction of a positive agency. Yet the stream must be filled from some other causes than those which merely shake the floodgates by which it is restrained : nor, un- less it were thus swelled beyond its usual height, could the mere opening of a free course to its tide produce so extensive and desolating an inunda- tion. Did the removal of these checks neces- sarily or probably involve the downfall of the religion, which they were employed to fence in, a strong probability would exist against the truth of that religion, which was thus incapable of maintaining, unassisted, its own ground, and of producing an adequate conviction of its divine origin. The question does not here relate to the use of articles, either to restrain individual error, or as the depository of the faith of highly-gifted and enlightened men, with the standard of whose belief it may be beneficial for all to compare the results of their own conviction ; but whether any X . PREFACE. relaxation of the binding force of these articles will produce not merely deviation from their doctrines within the bounds of Christianity, but the abandonment of the principles and the autho- rity of Christianity itself. The affirmative of this question is indeed implied in the conduct and avowed principles of the Church of Rome, but it has, exteriorly to that church, received hitherto only the unwelcome support of Hobbes, and another English deist \ Though fully assured of the excellence of Mr. Rose's intentions, the author could not but think, that the view sup- ported in his work involved the abandonment of the fundamental principles of Protestantism, and derogated from the independence and the inherent power of the word of God. That Scripture did need no such adscititious means to preserve generally its healthful truths from such corruption as would neutralize their efficacy, appeared to result from the history of the early Church, in which for above two centuries no symbols were at all received, and even when heretical specula- tion did render such safe-guards necessary in individual cases, they were extended no further * The author beheves that he found this theory in Tindal, but cannot at the moment be certain in which of the Enghsh deists he met with it. . PREFACE. Xi than the emergency of such cases required ; the rest of the body of Christian doctrine was com- mitted to the keeping of unauthoritative tradi- tion, expounding the word of Scripture : that a recurrence to Scripture is sufficient to regenerate the system when corrupted, independent of, or in opposition to, existing symbols, resulted from the various portions of the history of the Reforma- tion. It must be repeated that it is not intended by the maintenance of these views to derogate from the value of articles generally, much less of such, as are drawn up with so much judgment and moderation as our own ; their value is certainly very great both to individuals, as presenting a test by which to examine the character of their own faith, and to the Church, as enabling it to exclude those, who depart from the principles upon which itself was founded. The view, in which the author felt it impossible to participate, was not a supposed probability that the Church might suffer ' from individual deviations,but the supposition that the whole or the greater part of the body must necessarily decline, unless it were voluntarily to bind its hands by the resolution never to deviate from the letter of the faith of its earlier state. During a year's residence in Germany, the author found that every class of theologians, with whom he had intercourse, (and among them were men Xa PREFACE. whose deep piety, sound faith, and extensive views excited his veneration,) shared these opinions with regard both to the inadequacy of the causes assigned by Mr. Rose for the deflections of Ger- man theology, and to the classes of errors which the Author thought he perceived in it. Aware, however, of the difficulties under which a stran- ger must always lie in appreciating the extent and influence of any complex state of things, but thoroughly dissatisfied with all the criticisms which had yet appeared in Germany, he applied to the theologian, of whose letter he has here given a translation, for his opinion in writing, as fufly as his important avocations permitted, upon the principal points in Mr. Rose's work. An early work, published by that author on the state of English Protestantism, (though circumstances had prevented his becoming so much acquainted as might have been wished with the largest por- tion of the Episcopal Church) indicated the possession of the talents and religious character requisite for the execution of the task. He performed it with the ready kindness, which the Author gladly acknowledges to have received from him in a gratifying and useful intercourse, and circumstances alone, which it is not necessary to state, have thus long delayed its appearance. In the translation, the principal object has been PREFACE. Xiii to render with the utmost faithfuhiess the mean- ing of the original, and to this, (as must be necessarily the case in any precise translation from so rich and powerful a language as the German), style has been voluntarily sacrificed. Professor Sack's numerous occupations not al- lowing him to enter into the other part of the enquiry, the historical causes of the late revolu- tion in German Theology, the Author has at- tempted a brief sketch, rather with the view of inducing others, whose principal department may lie within the province of ecclesiastical history, to institute a fuller investigation, than with the wish that his own opinions should be adopted. He feels indeed convinced, from his own exami- nation, and from the independent concurrence of some of the most valuable divines in Germany, that conclusions more or less corresponding with these will be the result of a more extensive en- quiry ; his only object, however, here is, that such an enquiry should be instituted. On this ground it being to him comparatively indifferent, with what reception his own opinions may meet, he will not feel himself under any obligation to maintain them, should they be opposed. Con- troversy is generally of little advantage to the public, and detrimental to those who engage in it ; and the Author will consequently not think it 6 XIV PREFACE. necessary to abandon his pursuits for the ungrate- ful and unprofitable employment of self-vindica- tion. The removal from any large public library, as well as from the greater portion of his own, during the period in which this Essay was written, has compelled him for the most part to quote mediate authorities only, instead of having re- course to the immediate sources. He has, how- ever, no reason to apprehend from the character of the authors principally used, Weismann, Bud- deus, Schrockh, Mosheim, Henke, Vater, Twes- ten, any incorrectness of the facts adduced. It may perhaps be necessary to state, in order to avoid misconception, that the term " Evangelical" is used in the following sheets according to the phraseology of the German church, to designate the Lutheran body, that of " Reformed" or " Cal- vinistic" for such as agree in the doctrine of the Lord's supper with ourselves. There remains in conclusion only, to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance derived from the MS. of a German friend, who has carried on the same enquiry, and whom though the Author is not permitted to name, he cannot but express his sincere sense of his kindness, as well as his thankfulness for the advantages, which through that kindness he has been, on many occasions, permitted to enjoy. C O NTE NTS. Introductory Letter by Professor Sack. Historical Enquiry. Uses, and extent of the Enquiry — Period from which it must be commenced — Causes of the imperfect completion of the Reformation in Germany — External — Internal — Conse- quent limitation and narrowing of the Lutheran Church — Per- nicious effects on the Theology of the 17th century — View of that Theology in its several parts, Scriptural Interpretation, Doctrinal and Moral Theology, Ecclesiastical History, Prac- tical Theology, and dangers to be apprehended from the state of each — General descriptions of it by Spener and Thomasius — Shocks sustained by this system, from the improvement attempt- ed by Calixtus — from the endeavour of Arndt and Spener to restore genuine Christianity — Means employed by Spener — Their influence — Continuation in the school of Halle — its character, institutions, and influence — its inherent liabilities to degenerate — School indirectly produced by it — Opposition to parts of the pre- vailing system by Arnold and Thomasius — Effects of the Wolfian Philosophy— Review of the state of Theology at the time of the first struggle with Unbelief —External circumstances^ tending to promote Unbelief — Moral and intellectual character of the age — Influence of Frederic— English and French Unbelievers— Nicolai — Popular Philosophy— Gradual decline of Theology— Influence of Baumgarten, Ernesti, Michaelis; of Semler, Monis, Koppe,&c. of Steinbart— Principal directions of German Theology then XVI CONTENTS. coexisting — Exceptions to the general Character — Individuals who prepared for a restoration of Christianity; Lessing, Herder — Opposition to the shallow philosophic-religious system by Kant — Influence of the system of Kant on its positive and negative side, favorable and unfavorable — Influence of the philosophy of Fichte, Schelling, Jacobi — Final formation of Rationalism — Results — Present state of German Theology and Church. LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK TO THE AUTHOR. You express a wish, my dear Friend, for my opinion upon Mr. Rose's book " on the state of Rehgion in Protestant Germany ;" and, even at the risk of your occasionally meet- ing with views and opinions contrary to those to which you are attached, I will give it you ; being fully convinced that we are agreed on the main points, and that you are yourself sufficiently acquainted with Germany to enter into the cir- cumstances, which either remove or mitigate the charges of Mr. R. You will allow me in the outset to own to you that a renewed perusal of the work of youi' countryman excited in me on two accounts a feeling of pain ; on the one hand, that so much evil could be said of the Theological Authors of my country, which it is impossible to clear away ; on the other, that this was done in a form and manner which could not but produce a confused view and false picture of the state of Germany. Gladly, however, I allow, that a very different mode of judging of German Theology would have given me infinitely deeper pain. I mean such an agreement with the prevailing views of the Rationalist School as would have presented them to the indifferent party in England under the dazzling colors of theological liberality. This would have seemed to me a yet more unnatural violation of the relation in which the English Church (taking the word in its widest sense) is called upon to stand to the German ; a 11 LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. and since Mr. R. has missed the real course of the deve- lopement of the opinions of theological Germany, the harsh and oft perplexing manner in which he has delivered his statement may still indirectly be productive of much good, although indeed in order to its attainment much accurate investigation and renewed examination on both sides will be unquestionably indispensable. You will have already per- ceived, (and indeed you were before aware) that I am not one of those Germans who have received this English work with a mere tissue of revilings, with renewed expressions of self-approbation, altogether mistaking the, (as I do not doubt) excellent and Christian disposition of its author. Very different are the thoughts to which it has given rise in myself; the most essential of these I will endeavour briefly to lay before you. First, then, I would remark the erroneousness and injus- tice of the imputation, that the Protestant Churches of Germany, founded as they were on the authority of Holy Scripture, at the same time permitted any one of their ministers and teachers to vary from it even in their public instruction as far and as often as they pleased *. At no place and at no time was such the case. The Protestant Churches of Germany have founded their public teaching and observances on confessions of faith, which their aban- donment of unchristian errors compelled them to frame ; and in these scriptural " confessions" themselves were marked out the limits, beyond which the liberty of their ministers was not to be extended. It was unavoidable and it was right, that the period, in which an undue value was attached to the letter of these confessions, should be followed by another, in which a distinction should be made between that which constitutes their essential import (to meet each error by the positive state- ment of the opposed truth,) and that which in the form of ex- P. 10. LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. iii pression originated solely in the then state of doctrinal science ; nor did this in any way destroy the right and duty to bind down the public teacher to the matter of the confession ; nor did the conduct of individuals who, in literary controversy, when this difference had been perceived, spoke slight- ingly of the value of the confessions generally, by any means imply any renunciation of them on the part of the Church. This, I repeat, never happened ; and if ecclesiastical autho- rities, in times of an innovating boldness of teaching, did allow the reins to pass too much from their hands, and occasionally permitted the liberty conceded to their teachers to be unworthily abused, still this was only a transient although great error of ecclesiastical jurisdiction. But the Church never abandoned aught of its rights, nor does their conduct establish any absurdity in the fundamental principles of the Protestant Churches. Would it be a fair and just inference, if from the cases in the English Episcopal Church in which unprincipled Clergy were for years con- tinued in their functions to the spiritual detriment of their Cure, one were to attribute to the Church the disgraceful inconsistency, that, while she appointed the Clergy for the edification of their charge, she at the same time permitted them to give offence by their unchristian life ? If Mr. R. will not allow this, but ascribes it to the deficiencies of indi- vidual spiritual authorities, how can he charge the Pro- testant Churches in Germany with inconsistency? Closely connected with this confusion of the errors in the Functionaries with the principles of the Church, is the too great value which Mr. R. attaches to the preventive means for those evils which he observed in Germany. The English Episcopal Church may glory and rejoice in the character of her XXXIX Articles, she may from her point of view give them the preference over those longer formula\ which had their origin in historical struggles and in the living Christian fiiith of their composers, (though I must repeat, that it is not in the nature of these confessions that the IV LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK, source of the weakness of the Authorities is to be sought ;) she may think it right to bind her ministers by subscription to these Articles ; nothing of all this do we wish to depreciate ; still one cannot grant to its advocates that the disorders ob- served in Germany evidenced the necessity of laying " some check and restraint upon the human mind," nor that the binding force, the necessity of the subscription, the setting the letter of the symbol on the same level with its scriptural contents, can be regarded as the source of the spiritual bless- ing which the Church enjoys. The former would too much resemble the control which the Romish Church exerts over her members ; the latter appears to involve too strange a confusion of the prevention of an evil with the existence of a good. The necessity of deterring the ministers of a Church from the arbitrary aberrations of heresy, by binding them to human Articles, and of thereby assuming the right to remove them when convicted of erroneous doctrines, may often, perhaps always, exist ; yet where it does exist, it presupposes an inclination to these heretical aberrations, and that in a de- gree proportionate to the apparent urgency of this necessity. Such an inclination, however, in a considerable part of the Clergy, is no healthy condition, nor one productive of blessing. Its suppression is but the prevention of a yet greater evil than actually exists within the system. The blessing, however, the blessing of doctrines delivered by enlightened and believing men, must be derived elsewhere ; from the spirit, namely, of grace and of prayer, which human forms can never give, but which they may by an unreasonable strictness hinder, though they cannot quench. When a Church then so far confides that this spirit of grace and of truth, which is the Spirit of Christ, will illumine her teachers, if duly prepared and called, as to trust that such unscriptural heretical aberrations, by which the basis of Christianity is shaken, should be but of rare occurrence ; she may, indeed, go too far in this originally noble confi- LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. y dence, and may find herself compelled by experience to return more decisively to the preventive means and rules comprised in the documents upon which she was founded : in no event, however, will she be tempted to look for blessing and prosperity, from the establishment of the most definite verbal forms, from the erection of symbols independent of immediate controversy, and from a mode of restraint which places the human form of the doctrine on an equality with the word of Scripture. Had she such expectations, it M^ere evident that she trusted more in the human formula than in the Spirit of Christ. While she trusts in this, she will indeed not neglect those means of protection ; still she will make it 'her first aim to impart to her young Clergy, by a genuine theological preparation, that spirit which preaches the same Gospel under forms, varying indeed, yet all within the limits of the word of Scripture, and which produces adherence to, and justification of, the doctrine not after the letter but after the spirit of the symbol : for ill were the state of any eccle- siastical authorities who should be unable to discern and to exhibit this spirit ; and lamentable the condition of any ' Church, which, besides the legal fences against error, did not believe in a source from which the truth issues in such a living stream, that error itself must progressively diminish, the administration of the law become continually more en- lightened, the means of repression less and less necessary. Such belief, however, and such endeavours form the prin- ciples upon which the Evangelical Churches of Germany acted. If they stumbled occasionally in this noble course is that a sign they can never reach the object they proposed ? and if their principles are grounded on faith in the Spirit of Christ, should they abandon them in the midst of their career, and recur to those which centre on a reliance upon the letter of the human form, and upon the restraining force of the law ? But this leads further to those other charges of Mr. R.'s work, which indeed constitute by for the most important VI LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. portion of its contents, the condemnatory representation of the direction which theology took for so long a period, and in part still takes, in so great a portion of the German authors : and here it is my duty both candidly to avow the pain which I also feel at such numerous aberrations from the purity of Christian truth ; and yet distinctly to indicate that this evil, when contemplated in the due connection with the fi'ee developement of theological science, (and how can science exist without freedom) appears partly to have taken place beyond the limits of the Church, partly to have been a necessary point of transition to a purer theology, partly to have been less widely extended than the author represents. It is not necessary for us, my dear friend, to settle as * preliminary, whether those rationalist tendencies, through which the external and internal facts of Christianity are to be transmuted and solved into speculation and reflection, are disastrous and pernicious in any literature, and in any times. Christianity is a divine fact, whose divine character, ex- ternally manifested, is inseparably united with an internal transformation of mind, which remains eternally distinct from any thing which man by his own device can produce : and yet will the rationalism of all times and all descriptions remove this distinction ; this is its error, this its irpwrov xpev^oQ, and herein is it at all times equally destructive, whether it employ itself in the sublimest speculations on the ideas contained in the facts of Christianity, or whether on the shallowest department of the common-place, empiric, factitious view of history it strain to evaporate the miracles of the sacred relation. Yet must we confess that this rationalism appears from time to time in every people and every literature. England has felt its full presumption and full perniciousness, in its deism. In France it united itself, though not at all tim.es entirely, with materialism : and in Germany, it appeared in the form of a baseless innovating interpretation of Scripture, a shallow, would-be enlightening philosophy of religion. LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. vii If then the author rightly says, that the distinctive and specially revolting characteristic of the German rationalism consists in its having made its appearance within the Church, and in the guise of Theology ; this indeed cannot be denied, yet it is not true to the extent to which the author represents it. Many of those wi-iters whom he quotes for their unscriptural positions and opinions, as Reimarus, Becker, Buchholz, &c., were never in any ec- clesiastical or theological office : they wrote as men pur- suing in entire independence their philosophical systems ; and if the influence of some of them widely extended itself even among the theologians, yet are not their opinions upon that account to be charged upon the theology and the Church. Or can this be done with greater fairness, than if the deistical principles of a Hume and a Gibbon, nay of a Toland and Tindal, were to be imputed to the English theology? We may further take into consideration, that many of those scientific men, who went furthest in a superficial and forced interpretation of the sacred docu- ments, belonged to the philosophical faculties in our univer- sities : in these it has ever been a ] rinciple to allow science to speak out -entirely unrestrained, even in opposi- tion to the doctrine of the Church, in the confidence that the theological faculty, through greater depth, or the greater correctness of its point of view, would be able to supply a counterpoise : if we take this also into the account, no small portion of the blame is already removed from the theolo- gians and the Church of Germany: the evil itself remains, but it appears more as connected with the philosophical and literary spirit of the time, than as a charge against the theology, which however it may have come in contact with, and been affected by, the pliilosophical endeavours of the age, has yet its own independent history ; nor are the several portions of this so indistinct and confused as would appear from the notes of Mr. Rose. And this constitutes the second point which I would viii LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. notice, namely, that not only in Mr. Rose's citations, but in the sketch given in the discourses themselves, the dis- tinction of the different times and periods has been to so great a degree neglected : an omission, which has entirely obscured the several points of transition by which theo- logy progressively advanced towards a purer and sounder state. How can your countrymen form a correct image of our literature, when Lessing and Schelling, Steinbart and Bretschneider, Tollner and Schleiermacher, Bahrdt and Wegscheider, Herder, and the anonymous author of the Vindiciae sacrse N. T. scriptur., are mentioned together, without any other distinction than the often incorrect dates ? Most of these authors who are thus named together, were separated by 30 or 40 years from each other ; they may to the letter say the same thing, and yet the meaning in which they say it, and the influence which it has upon the times, are by no means the same ; the earlier have, perhaps, suggested as an experiment what has long since been discarded ; or they have started that as philosophers, which only the more superficial writers have attempted to convert into theology : several of them moreover had grown up in close connec- tion with a period in which it was a duty to contend against a false orthodoxism which clung to the letter alone : while many of the weaker moderns have proceeded to develope their opinions into positions, against which those nobler strugglers for truth would themselves with great earnestness have contended. The neglect of these historical relations however, (which is not made good by the description of Semler) casts a false light upon the whole view. Had our author possessed a vivid conception of the spirit of German theology, which toward the middle of the preceding century was more rigidly attached, than was ever the case in England, to a false system of doctrine, combined with a confined idea of inspiration, and a stiff intolerant method of demonstra- tion, which impeded the healthy process of a scriptural and deeper theology ; had he moreover by the study of the LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. ix noblest authors of our nation in that earher period, whether in philosophy, or in practical or elegant literature, learnt the inward desire after a noble genuine freedom of mind, for which at that time Protestant and Romanist longed, he would deem the rise of a new and partly daring direction of theology, not only a natural but an interesting pheno- menon; he would have acknowledged that in part the legitimate requisitions of science in philology and history, led to the adoption of that new course ; that many also of those so-called innovators, were well conscious that they pos- sessed a Christian and good scriptural foundation and ob- ject, but that almost all were so deficient in firm scientific principles in the execution of these views, that too much freedom and too open a course was given to the bad, the capricious, and the irreligious, to violate the sanctuaries of the Bible, by a semi-philosophical babbling and a lawless criticism. If then this point of view be adhered to, that all German innovations in theology discharged themselves principally in two main channels ; the one in which scientific clearness and freedom were the object of honest exertion, the other in which an inward indisposition toward the peculiar character of the Christian Religion, moulded the yet uncompleted results of historical investigation with a shallow philosophy into an unconnected revolting commixture of naturalism and popular philosophy, all the phenomena in the history of theology will be sufficiently explained. That better race of authors, for the most part too little acquainted with the principles of the science of scriptural interpretation, and the defence of religion, committed indeed many an error, but with a chastened judgment they again struck back into the right path. It was natural that they should occasionally fail at first sight to recognise the shallowness and pervcrtcd- ness of enquiries of the second sort ; and that to a certain degree participating in the fascination with which the spirit of that time had invested every species of tolerance, they X . LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. should expose themselves to the injustice, by which their purer endeavours were subsequently confounded with those of the deistic naturalist ; — an injustice frequently practised in these times in a crying manner, not by Romanists only, but by Protestants of too exclusive a system of theology. And now that this better sort of temperate, religiously dis- posed, and scientific enquirers have gained a better basis, rule, and method, partly through their own more enlarged acquaintance with the province of their science (to which be- longs also the acknowledgment of its limits) ; partly through the exertions of decided apologists and apologetic doctrinal wi'iters ; partly, and not least, through the endeavours of a deeper philosophy ; and lastly, in part through the religious stimulus caused by momentous political events; now also that studies in ecclesiastical history, alike deep in their character and pure in their point of view, have quick- ened the sight for discerning the essence of Christianity ; our German theology is attaining a pure and scientific character, which it could not have acquired, so unfettered and in such full consciousness, without first discharging itself of those baser elements. Much is yet left to be done, much to clear away ; but the more that genuine apologetic and hermeneutic principles^ derived from the nature of belief and of thought, possess themselves of the mind, the more will those falsifying theo- ries of accommodation, those wretched explanations of mira- cles, those presumptuous critical hypotiieses, give place to a perspicuous viev/ of the essence of Divine Revelation, to a living understanding of the prophetic and apostolic writings, and consequently to a purer exposition of the main doctrines of Christianity. You must not allow this hope to be obscured by what you may have seen of the sti'uggles of supernatural- ism, and rationalism, or perhaps may read most obnoxiously exhibited in several of our periodical works. Within the province of proper theology this contest is not so important as it often appeiu's, and the more it developes itself the LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. Xl less lasting can it be ; inasmuch as an independent rational- ism is irreconcileable with the very idea of Christian theo- logy, and a bare supernaturahsm, which goes no further than what its name expresses, does not contain the slightest por- tion of the substance and doctrines of Christianity. If then it is true, that through a genuine study of scriptural inter- pretation and of history, a better theology has begun to find place among us, the distracting influence which this conflict exerts, must of necessity here also be gradually di- minished: on the other hand it will probably continue, pos- sibly yet more develope itself, in the more direct province of religion, in philosophy and in politics, where amid many a struggle, and many an alternation, it may systematise itself in the contrast of a religious and of an atheistic, or of a sincere and of an hypocritical character of thought, and then again from the various points of mutual contact unavoidably re-act upon theology. This danger is, liov/ever, no other than that to which the English Episcopal, nay even the Roman- ist, and indeed every part of the Christian Church, is ex- posed ; and this disease, thus universal to mankind, may indeed delay, but cannot preclude, the restoration of Ger- man theology, derived from the genuine sources of philolo- gical and historical investigation combined with that ex- perience in faith, which brings tlie mind and heart in vivid contact with them. If, however, Mr. Rose has failed to perceive the neces- sary course of developement of German theology, so neither has he become sufficiently acquainted with, nor duly appre- ciated, the counter Avorkings, by which the further progress of the evil was even in the worst and most perplexed times opposed and checked. He names indeed Storr as an oppo- nent of the rationalist school, yet so that no one could thence perceive that this theologian was only the represen- tative of a party at all times considerable and important. He names tlie philosophy of Schelling, yet almost as if all the impulses in Religion and in the Church, which, for al- ;S» LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. most twenty years, have been tending to improvement and increased unity, were derived from the suspicious source of mystical philosophemata. Neither was the case. Storr was but the disciple of the whole school of Wiirtemberg and Tiibingen, of which he was subsequently the head; a school which, without being exempt from the errors of the time, has now for between thirty and forty years united in its writings the most conscientious earnestness with the deep- est investigation. Here should have been mentioned toge- ther with Storr the names and the works of the two Flatts, of Slisskind, Bengel, Steudel, &c. To the same effect notice should also have been taken of Reinhard, who, chiefly by" the pure means of works alike classical and theological, promoted an improved spirit in Saxony ; of Knapp, who, but lately deceased, blended the purest orthodoxy with classical attainments, which might satisfy even English scholars, and with a depth of scriptural interpretation, which was the object of respect in every school ; of Hess, the venerable investigator and relator of biblical history ; of the works of Planck on Theological Encyclopaedia, and in defence of Christianity ; of Kleuker in Kiel, Schott in Jena, Schwarz in Heidelberg, and of the direction (in part one of scientific depth) deci- sively opposed to the common rationalism, which the theo- logical faculty of Berlin has by its historical and philosophi- cal investigations, for more than fifteen years imparted to theological study. All this must be viewed in connection with the great number of well-disposed and Christian prac- tical Clergy in evangelical Germany, and with the almost universal removal of the lower classes from unchristian books upon religion. It should have been acknowledged, that in certain parts of Germany and Switzerland, Christian socie- ties existed for the purpose of mutually imparting biblical and Christian knowledge, and for the circulation of the Scrip- tures, even previous to the (it must be confessed, somewhat too vehement) impulse given by the British Bible Society. It should have been noticed, how the community of the BETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. xiii Moravian brethren exerted, upon the whole, a very deep and gentle influence (even though not altogether exempt from error) upon the very highest as well as upon the lowest classes, in producing the reception of the fundamental doc- trines of Christianity, especially of the Atonement. It should have been remarked, that the entirely voluntary asso- ciations in Bible and Missionary Societies could not have been so universal and so great, as is upon the whole the case, without a considerable foundation of Christian disposi- tion ; this and so much more therewith connected, must be more accurately known, investigated deeper, and exhibited in more connexion, before the theology and Church of Protes- tant Germany can be displayed in their real form ; and they would then certainly not appear so revolting and so oifend- ing as they are represented in Mr. R.'s work. Should these remarks have now made it clear that the foundations upon which the theology of Protestant Germany may be raised to a high degree of pure Christian and sci- entific elevation, are, through the blessing of God, already laid on the deep basis of her improved principles, neither can one share the great expectations which the author enter- tains from the introduction among ourselves of fixed litur- gies, and an ecclesiastical constitution resembling that of the Episcopal Church. Be it here undecided how far the one or the other could in themselves contribute to a better state of things ; thus much at least is certain, that in a church ac- customed, in the noblest sense of the word, to so mucli free- dom as that of Evangelical Germany, and which, without any external interference, is at this moment conscious of a voluntary return to the fundamental evangelical principles, (a return in which all its earlier spiritual and scientific advances are comprised and guaranteed,) political restraint can be neither necessary nor beneficial. Those, however, who conceive that they can observe in the theology and Church of Evangelical Germany an internal formative prin- ciple, tending to realize a high Christian purity, while they XIY LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. do not ascribe the same value as the author to the measure which he proposes, will attach themselves so much the more firmly to one, which they regard as proceeding from the same principle, and of which the author speaks with an almost inconceivable suspicion. You will perceive, that I speak of the union of the Lutheran and Reformed Churches in Germany; and I must confess to you, that it is the judg- ment passed upon this, which appears to me to fix the stamp of misconception upon every thing else which is unclear in the work. Had the author but recalled to mind, that in the period of the greatest indifference to religion and church, the division of these two parties continued unregarded and unmitigated ; that the endeavour to remove it coincided with the renewal of a warm interest in divine worship and in the Church, had he allowed himself to be informed, that it ori- ginated with men very far removed from indifFerentism, and promoted by that very evangelically-disposed king of Prussia, from whom he himself anticipates so much, he could scarcely have ascribed the union to motives so bad. But had he (which he at all events both could and ought) informed him- self, that the one difference in doctrine between the two Churches is of such a nature, that the distinction can scarcely be retained in the symbolical books of the Church even by a straw-splitting nicety, (this is the case with regard to the doctrine of the Lord's Supper in the two Churches) while the other, that regarding election, never existed in Germany, (in that the strict Calvinistic doctrine is not at all expressed in the symbol of the German reformed Church, the Heidel- berg Catechism) and that Brandenburg expressly refused to acknowledge the definitions of the synod of Dort respecting it ; had he weighed this he would have spared himself this hostility against a work, in its nature originating in Chris- tian brotherly love, and which has already produced in many countries, especially in Prussia and Baden, the cheering fruits of reanimated interest in the Church. Yet enough; for you, my worthy friend, I have made LETTER FROM PROFESSOR SACK. XV myself sufficiently intelligible, and should I, through your means, perhaps, contribute to prepare a portion of your coun- trymen for a correcter view of the character of Protestant Germany, I should deem myself happy in thereby repaying a small portion of the debt, which the privilege of surveying the character of your English Church, in its important and pure (though as yet unreconciled) contrasts, has laid upon me. And if I might express a wish, which forces itself upon me at the close of this long letter, it is, that more of your young theologians would visit our Protestant Universities, become acquainted with our theologians, and hear our preachers, only not making a transient and hasty stay, nor living principally amid books, but acquainting themselves with the people, and the Church, and the literature, in their real character, and ready for mutual confidential interchange of their different talents. With real regard and esteem, Your's most sincerely, Charles Henry Sack, Professor of Theology, and Minister of the Evangelical Church of Bonn. Bonn, Juli/ 27, 1827. 1 HISTORICAL ENQUIRY, Human nature, as in itself it for the most part remains the same, so does it continue upon the whole in the same relation to Christianity, opposes the same obstacles to its first reception, and to the complete exertion of its influence, furnishes the same temptations to substitute for it a mere passive acquiescence in its doctrines, or to convert it into a mere material for the speculation of the understanding. Still more uniform than the ex- istence of the obstacles themselves is the na- tural tendency of each aberration to re-pro- duce another, for the most part its opposite, extreme. The form, however, of the impedi- ments, and the prominence assumed by each, will be in great measure modified and deter- mined by the degree of civilization, by the pecu- liarities and predominant tendency of each age, by national character, and by national circum- stances. Fruitful then as must be every portion of ecclesiastical history, in exhibiting the inherent power of Christianity to conquer the different difficulties to which it is opposed, in proving it to be the leaven, by which the whole mass of hu- B 2 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST man nature is to be penetrated and changed, and in supplying the knowledge of the conditions by which the full exertion of that influence is limit- ed ; more especially productive must those por- tions be, which relate to its struggles in nations, derived from the same common stock, under cir- cumstances in many respects similar, and above all, where the remedy applied was equally freed from the grossest of those extraneous admixtures, which in other less favoured countries create a pre- judice against its use, or diminish its efficacy. The experience furnished by Evangelical Germany is to us as the biography of an individual to one of similar character, temperament, and circum- stances. The plant, though its growth and exter- nal character may be affected by the influence of a different climate, will not belie its original stock : nor can the atmosphere of a neighbouring region be changed, without the probability of its affect- ing our own. Linked as European nations are, every direction which the human character takes in one country must exert an influence over the rest ; the circulation may be rendered more or less rapid by the peculiar subordinate organization of each ; yet still is the whole one great system, no part of which can be affected without indirectly operating upon the rest, in a degree proportioned to the general analogies of their constitution. Nor is it nationally alone that the result of German experience may benefit ourselves ; the moral and religious history of mankind is but an enlarged biography ; should therefore no crisis be impend- CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 3 ing over this country, similar to that from which Germany is now recovering, (and, with some simi- larities, there is still sufficient which is dissimilar, to justify the hope that we shall be preserved from such a visitation,) much individual profit and warning may be obtained from the study. The several, and not unfrequently opposite, aberrations which took place in Germany, and which terminated in the temporary unbelief of so large a portion of its speculating minds, has not unfrequently been realized in the deflection of a single individual. Independently, moreover, of its personal as well as national utility, it affords in itself a sublime con- templation of the innate force of pure Christianity, which, instead of sinking irrevocably, as the fall- ing stars of the false religions of old, or the now waning crescent of Mohammedanism, shines forth again with a clearer brightness, and a more vivi- fying warmth, from amid the clouds which were for awhile permitted to obscure its face. Su- perstitions or false belief, foundations of " wood, hay, stubble '," when tried by the fire, disappear for ever ; divine truth, as the " silver and gold," in each successive trial to which it has been ex- posed, has come forth purer from the human alloy which had collected round it. A large, however, and extensive survey will be necessary, whenever this crisis is to be fully un- derstood. Completely comprehended, indeed, it can then only be, when time shall have more entirely disclosed the results, to which Providence » 1 Cor. iii. 12. B 2 4 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST has through this fearful developement been con- ducting the Evangelical Church in Germany; though enough may be already seen to lay open His general purposes, and to furnish comfort amid that temporary desolation in the gladdening results of a purer, more active, more vivifying faith, which are even now apparent. Even the causes, however, by which these events were immediately produced, can only be fully discovered by a wide and accurate study of the previous history, from a period long prior to their commencement. No revolution or developement in the moral, or poli- tical, any more than in the physical world, can be understood from the single contemplation of the times alone in which it takes place. The pro- ducing causes must evidently be anterior to the commencement of the manifestation of the re- sults. As in vegetable nature, the seed has long been prepared, the root has already struck, before the first indications of the germ above the sur- face, so, for the most part, has the train of producing causes been long imperceptibly in ac- tion, before they give any visible manifestations of their agency ; the developement itself is almost inevitable, before the tendency of circumstances to produce it is generally felt. But if such is the case in civil, much more is it in religious, history, since this exhibits not the result of irregular, un- defined, and often jarring, principles ; but the application of one uniform system, the course of one great plan for the elevation, purifying, hal- lowing, of the human mind, in the vast contest. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 5 which in the words of one of the most philoso- phic observers of Germany, forms the only and the deepest theme of the history of the world and of man, the contest of faith and unbelief ^ An unity thus necessarily belongs to ecclesiasti- cal history, which no other history, even of prin- ciples, at least to the same degree, can claim ; and the necessity of considering each given period in combination with the whole, or at all events with a large preceding portion, becomes manifestly more indispensable. Throughout this vast course, however, there occurs a series of elevations, from which the survey of the several intervening stages is facilitated, and the relation of the whole scheme to each tendency of the human mind, which it is given to correct, becomes more distinct. Uniform as this scheme is in itself, the subordinate princi- ples, with which it is brought in contact in succes- sive ages, will necessarily vary : and as, in combi- nation or in conflict with these, it either proceeds tranquilly onward, modifying and being in its external character modified by them, or, having reached a crisis, manifests itself more energeti- cally in the new developement to which this crisis gives rise, there have been and will be a succes- sion of periods and of eras in its history. Each new era is the commencement of a new period, in which the results of the former crisis are car- ried on in gradual progress ; each new period pre- pares for a new crisis, as soon as the human prin- ciples, with which Christianity has been brought ' Gothe Westostlicher Divan, S. 224. 6 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST in contact, or by which it has been acted upon, shall have acquired sufficient strength to induce a re-action, if the foreign ingredients be combined with it ; a collision, if they be opposed. Each period then will be best understood from the pre- ceding crisis or era; each era requires for its explanation the knowledge of the preceding pe- riod. In the periods also, or at least in their later portions, it appears, Christianity will be most mingled with, or opposed by, extraneous princi- ples ; in the eras, it will most exert its native and original powers. The last great crisis in the Christian Church in Germany preceding that, which is now being developed, was the Reforma- tion ; and from that time, therefore, must any full investigation of the course of things, which led to the present, commence. This, however, though upon the whole one period, in that no complete crisis intervened in it, can be subdivided, accordingly as the system, which became predo- minant, was either pre-eminently engaged in the process of formation, or in maintaining itself against its various antagonists. It must, how^- ever, be kept in view, that this division is subor- dinate ; inasmuch as these conflicts, till the final collision with unbelief, succeeded indeed in de- taching portions from the sway of that system, but not in modifying its character. Within the limits, which it yet retained, its developement continued, until the final crisis by v/hich it was overthrown. It will be further necessary in any complete view, to con^ider distinctly the two ele- CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 7 ments of Theology, the religious basis and the scientific form ; though mutually acting upon each other, it is only by a distinct consideration, that the very different efforts, which in the close of this period tended to the same results, can be un- derstood and appreciated. The minor periods then are, I. — The formation of the system from the Reformation, and its developement through the Formula of Concord until the first opposition. II. — The Opposition, 1. on the scientific side by Calixtus, 2. on the religious side by Spener and the school of Halle carrying on the earlier efforts of Arndt, 3. both on its scientific and reli- gious side, either by the partial but honest endea- vours of men, whose sole object was to remove its errors, or by unbelief in its various gradations. Much, both in the external and internal cir- cumstances of the German Reformation, occurred to prevent its full and adequate developement. Had this been perfected in the spirit in which its great instrument might have completed it, if permitted tranquilly to finish his work, or sup- ported by others, acting in his own principles, and surveying the whole system of Revelation with the comprehensive and discriminating view of his master-mind, the history of the German Church had probably been altogether different ; the re- sults, which it is now reaching after centuries, and at which it is arriving through such a fearful tran- sition, might have been even then attained. A great part of the really valuable principles, which have resulted from the late collisions, may be 8 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST found, unsystematized indeed, occasionally only implied, in the works of Luther. The fruitless at- tempts to satisfy an uneasy and active conscience by the meritorious performances of a Romish con- vent had opened his eyes to the right understand- ing of Scripture, in whose doctrines alone it could find rest ; and the clear and discerning faith which this correspondence of Scripture with his own experience strengthened in him, gave him that in- tuitive insight into the nature of Christianity, which enabled him for the most part unfailingly to discriminate between essentials and non-essen- tials, and raised him not only above the assumed authority of the church, and above the might of tradition, but above the influence of hereditary scholastic opinions, the power of prejudices, and the dominion of the letter. Unfortunately, how- ever, the further expansion of his views neces- sarily yielded to the then yet more important practical employments, to which this great apostle of evangelical truth dedicated the most of his exertions ; — the instruction of the young, the care of all the churches, the necessary struggles with the Romish Church, or with those seceders from it, who maintained tenets inconsistent with the first principles of the Reformation, as in the op- posed errors of the Anabaptists, and of Zwingli. His successors, in developing to the utmost subordinate but contested points of his system, neglected the great views which lay beyond the sphere of their polemics. Few, comparatively, in the large mass of the active agents in the CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 9 Reformation, were led to the rejection of the errors of the Church of Rome through the same school of experience, by which the master-mover had been conducted. Many had been merely theoretically convinced of its errors, others sought a freedom from intellectual tyranny, others poli- tical advantages, some finally followed, but half consciously, the mighty impulse. The number of the noble band, who were actuated by the same spirit which impelled Luther, was dimi- nished, and their agency disturbed by the troubles of the times ; by which e. g. Melanchthon and Chytrseus became for some time wanderers in Germany; Bucer acquired among ourselves anew scene of evangelical exertion. More fatal than the impediments thus presented to the tranquil developement of the principles of the R,eforma- tion were the internal divisions, originating in an imperfect conception of its scheme, which distracted its members, and diverted their atten- tion from its essential points to subjects of very subordinate importance, or upon which con- troversy should never have been raised. These had been checked indeed by the commanding spirit of Luther ; after his death (1546) no one was left of sufficient authority or firmness to pre- vent their eruption, or to lead back the current. Even in Melanchthon's life, the Adiaphoristic ' * Henke infers from this controversy being confined to the Electorate of Saxony, exclusive of Brandenburg, where the ob- noxious compliances were carried to a greater extent, that not the supposed errors, but the school of Melanchthon, was the real object of attack. (Kirchengesch. iii. 418.) 10 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST controversy, (a controversy, which, from the neg- lect of the simple but comprehensive principles of St. Paul, has, under different forms in various ages, been destructive of Christian charity, and drawn down the minds of Christians to minute and subordinate questions from the great and influ- ential truths of the Gospel,) the Majoristic ', Synergistic ^ Flacianist "^, Osiandrist ^ Stanca- ^ Major's doctrine of the necessity of good works to salvation, had appeared without offence inMelanchthon's lociTheol. 1535, as well as in the translation by Justus Jonas, 1536. Being however repeated in the Interim of Leipzig, in which Major had a share, it served to swell the papistical errors which were to be found in it. Major throughout maintained justification by faith alone* willingly pledged himself not to use the offensive expression, yet was compelled publicly to recant. One of his principal antago- nists, as is known, held " that they were hurtful to salvation." Schrockh Kircheng. B. 39, S. 548, fg^. ^ The doctrine questioned had appeared with Luther's appro- bation in Melanchthon's Examen ordinandorum in the scholastic form, that there were three causes of conversion, God, God's Word, and Free-will, (Vater. K. G, 225.) implying, hov/ever, (according to Pfeffinger's explanation in the present contest) " that though the human will could not awaken or rouse itself " to good works, but must be awakened by the Holy Spirit, yet " that man was not altogether excluded from such works of the " Holy Spirit, to the degree that he should not also do his share." (Planck Gesch. des Prot. Lehrbegr. ap. Schr. ib. 554.) ' The principal subject of the controversies in which Flacius was, on the defensive, engaged, was an assertion made in the vehemence of his opposition to Strigel, that " original sin was the substance of human nature." * Brentius, who wrote as the organ of the theologists of Wiirtemberg, concluded their judgment by saying, that if the theologians of Konigsberg would interpret each other's words in Christian love, and not explain unusual or imperfect expressions with the greatest rigour and in the worst sense, they would not then CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 11 rian ^ had unceasingly torn the infant church^; nor can it have been the mere love of peace, but rather the deep and oppressive sense of the im- pediments presented to the progress of the truth by these endless and by him incurable dissentions, which made Melanchthon gladly hail approaching death as a refuge from the phrenzy (rabie) of the Theologians ^ ; nor was it merely as his own anxious wish, but rather as the most important principle contend against each other as against Turks, especially as this dispute could produce no useful result, (ap. Schr. ib, 579.) Though the whole question was whether SiKaiu'Ofjyai signified " to be acquitted," as Osiander held, or to be made righteous, and whether, (it being allowed on both sides, that our righteous- ness was derived from the perfect obedience of Christ, and his obedience resulting from his divine nature) Christ were our righteousness solely according to his divine nature, Osiander was accused by a synod of " destroying the whole merit of the atonement of Christ." (Schrockh, ib. 582.) The people were warned in sermons against his devilish heresy, (ib. 578.) and the command of Duke Albrecht of Prussia to wave the contested point in their sermons, declared by his opponents to have ema- nated from the devil. (Ib. 581.) ^ The over-speculation of Osiander naturally produced the re- action, that the work of justification was ascribed by Stancarus to the human nature alone of Christ. ^ Schlusselberg, who has more fully than any other contem- porary writer enumerated the contests of his times, composed his " Catalogus Hereticorum," in 13 Svo. volumes, describing as many classes of deviations. (Schr. ib. 484.) 3 Melch. Adam. Vita Germ. Philos. p. 93. That these evils, not the depreciation and revilings of his own name and character, were what Melanchthon principally felt, see in Heerbrand Pr. Funebr. in ob. Mel. in Strobel's Miscell. St. vi. S. 215. Strobel's Apologia Mel. wider Goze. 12 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST which he could impress upon his times, that he wrote as his motto and memorial in the alba of his contemporaries, " a contentioso Theologo libera nos, bone Deus." Far be it from us, how- ever, who are removed by the differences of age and manners from the temptations to which these often well-intentioned men were exposed, who, though our faith be equally the result of inde- pendent conviction, have yet had the easier task of examining an existing system by the test of Scripture, instead of that of constructing it for ourselves from the ruins of one deformed by human additions, and whom the lapse of time has for the most part enabled to discriminate be- tween the vital and the subordinate truths of the Gospel, to judge harshly of those, whose difficul- ties we have not experienced. It was, perhaps, natural, certainly pardonable, that accustomed by early and deeply impressed habit, in the Church which they had left, to attach an equal value to every doctrine, and dazzled by the adscititious in- terest, with which the recency and difficulty of the acquisition had invested every portion of the newly obtained truths, they failed to appreciate the relative value of those truths ; especially as these were, for the most part, opposed to a sys- tem, every portion of which was inculcated as of equal importance, every departure from which was represented as an equal sin : it was natu- ral also, that those who differed in opinion should be suspected of disaffection to the common cause; and consequently, that as every error seemed to CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 13 be an error in essentials, those should appear the least excuseable, who in other points approached the nearest to the truth, and in whom, there- fore, from the general correctness of their views, a single aberration would appear the result of wil- fulness. These principles would of course exert a similar influence upon the human deductions or speculations by which they fenced, or defined, the newly-acquired divine truths. External circum- stances, however, also contributed to foster this uncompromising refusal to allow of the slightest deviation, even in the minuter and collateral points, which had once been saiictioned. The unhappy limitation of the toleration, guaranteed by the re- ligious peace of Augsburg, to the adherents of the Augsburg Confession, and the undisguised anxiety of the Romanists to take advantage of any devia- tion from the letter of that Confession ^, to ex- ^ Many of these attacks, either upon the vahdity of a rehgious peace generally, or upon its extension to those who only accepted the Confession with Melanchthon's later alteration, are related in Salij's Vollstand. Hist, der Augsb. Conf. Th. 1. S. 772. fg. ; see also Budd. Isag. 429. 441. Among these one of the most re- markable was written by the private secretary of the Emperor, 1586 (Schrockh Kirchengesch. B. 39. S. 338. fg.) It is well known that the Reformed were not formally included in the reli- gious peace until nearly a century afterwards, by the peace of Westphalia ; that even then this acknowledgment was protested against by the Elector of Saxony, and obtained only by the asse- veration of the Elector of Brandenburg, that he accepted every thing which was verbally contained in the confession of Augsburg, and by the interposition of Holland and Sweden ; even then the theological distinction was maintained by the substitution of the words " inter illos," for " inter hos," which latterwould havedirectly 14 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST elude them from the protection which it afforded bound them to its letter, as the safeguard of theii privileges or their existence. The common-place and shallow argument also, drawn from the varia- tions of the evangelical statements of doctrine against the truth of their system itself, which was even then urged, was met not by the easy task of retort upon the Romish Church, nor by the ob- vious principle that all human discoveries of truth must be gradual, must be effected by the slow and toilsome passage through error, nor by shewing that these discrepancies in collateral points, or modes of statement, were still entirely consistent with the truth and harmony of the general sys- tem, but by drawing still closer the limits of their Churches' pale, and by excluding as heretics all who departed from the strictest letter of the sym- bol. The Protestant princes, who had embraced the Reformation rather from feeling than from clear views, felt themselves responsible for the doctrines of their clergy ; and, perplexed by the differences of the Socinians, Anabaptists, Fana- tics, and their own controversialists, sought to obviate discordance by minute and detailed con- included them among the members of the Augsburg Confession^ (see authorities in Schrockh, ib. 347 ; Henke, K. G. B. 3. S. 596 fg. ; Vater, K. G. S. 269.) Even after this the theologians of Wittenberg taught, that this, as a political measure, could not affect the theological question, (Henke, B. 4. S. 272.) After this time, however, the political interests of the two evangelical bo- dies, in that the voices of both together only equalled those of the one Romanist, became identified. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 15 fessions : in other cases their political jealousies, especially those of the two lines of the house of Saxony, of which the younger had dispossessed the elder of the Electorate (1547), aided to give bitterness to these contests ^ Not theologians merely, but jurists, historians, even physicians, participated in the acrimony of the elder branch ^ Yet, however these and other difficulties may prevent our assuming an uncharitable right to condemn the successors of the Reformers, certain it is, that the measures employed to produce uni- formity, miserably impeded the progress of the Reformation, buried in great measure the hardly won evangelical truth under a load of scholastic definitions, and converted the Gospel truth it- self, when it shone dimly through, into matter of speculation, instead of motive for practice. The history of Christian controversy scarcely ex- hibits more unhappy, more unpractical, and fre- quently presumptuous polemics, than many of those which distracted the German Church after the death of Luther, unless perhaps in the eastern controversies^ on the person of the Redeemer, ^ Schrockh, ib. 554. In these originated the foundation of the University of Jena, as a bulwark of genuine Lutheranism against the falsifications of the then Melanchthonian Wittenberg : the new edition of Luther's works, in opposition to the alleged corruptions of the collection of Wittenberg, was a proof of the spirit in which it was founded, as also the strictest and most polemical Lutherans, such as Flacius, were invited thither. ' Henke, 3. 411.fgg. == The Annals of Eutychius furnish, perhaps, the fullest proof 6 16 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST or the endless straw-splittings of the schoolmen. Little, indeed, could be hoped from measures so little in unison with the principles of the Refor- mation, as the attempt to re-establish a minute uniformity by the oppressive accumulation of new formulae of faith, or by the infliction of civil, some- times the severest, penalties for minute declen- sions even from the human system. Both, however, were extensively employed. Of the latter it may be sufficient to mention the impri- sonment of StrigeP, the deposition and banish- ment of Hardenberg^ (1561), the ten years con- finement of the physician Peucer^ and the death that the uncharitableness of controversy is in proportion to its un- practicalness. See Annales Eutych. ed. Pococke, Oxon. ^ To obtain Strigel's release, after he had been confined three years for maintaining, that man was not merely passive in the work of his conversion, not evangelical princes only, but the ca- tholic Maximilian interfered. Schrockh, ib. 560. ^ Hardenberg, minister in Bremen, was banished from the whole of Lower Saxony, for approximating to the reformed doc- trine on the communion, though he admitted a sacramental dis- tribution of the body of Christ, distinct from the participation by the faithful, (Schrockh, ib. 602) that the body of Christ was distributed with, but not in, the bread, (ib. 600.) His followers were deposed, and excluded from the communion. In the course of the proceedings an edict of 1534 is referred to, which directed the immediate expulsion of Anabaptists and Sacramentarists from Bremen. The persecutors of Hardenberg, having afterwards wil- lingly resigned their ofiices rather than cease from revilings in the pulpit, succeeded in inducing Hamburg and Lubeck to ex- clude Breinen from their league, and renounce her commerce, as a protectress of heresies. Her trade suffered also, from the same cause, in Dantzig, and other places. ^ Peucer's offence was the recommending for the theological CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 17 of Cracau, a Jurist, in consequence of torture, with the banishment or imprisonment of tlie other Crypto-Calvinists of Saxony (1574), measures re- enacted against the same par::y after a temporary encouragement (1591), with the additional blot of the death of Krell their chief after ten years confinement \ (1601) and the deposition and banishment of Huber^ for a mere variation in chairs at Wittenberg zealous followers of Melanchthon, and the share which he had in promoting the reception of their catechism, which yet asserts, that in the receiving the Sacrament, the Son of God is truly, and according to his substance, present. (Schrockh, ib. 615.) The reason why Cracau was put to the torture is not known ; yet he was apprehended as a promoter of the Philippian school. These two cases are the stronger, in that neither be- longed to the theological body, and both were men of distin- guished talents. Cracau had had a principal share in the " Con- stitutions of Augustus," the celebrated reform of Saxon law. (Schrockh, ib. 619.) Neither were the other depositions con- fined to theologians, (ib. 621.) another eminent man died after two years imprisonment. " Others," says Schrockh, " met with similar fates." (Ibid.) ' The final sentence against Krell, Chancellor of Christian I. of Saxony, imputed to him secret practices with foreign courts, (the supplying Henry IV. with troops against the league.) This, though the pretext, cannot have been the real reason, since four years expired before the nature of his accusation was agreed upon. It seems probable that the jealousy of the nobility, whom he had in great measure excluded from office, combined with his attempted innovations in religion, was the cause of his fate. (Sec Schrockh, ibid. 649—659.) ^ Huber maintained that the Calvinistic predestination could only be effectually opposed by the assumption of an " universal election to eternal life ;" yet this he so explained, that it became entirely equivalent to the " universal call, ofier of mercy," &c. The contest was miserably prolonged by the obstinacy in adhe- C 18 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST the mode of stating the Lutheran doctrine, that none are excluded from salvation. Depositions of all the clergy of a province, who refused to subscribe a newly introduced formula, were not unfrequent, where the prince passed from the Lutheran to the Reformed Church : yet here the intemperance ' of the clergy often mitigated, often justified, the proceeding. The similar enactments of the Lutheran Church had no plea but the supposed necessity of a strict adherence to the letter of its founder. The effect of these violent measures was in their own nature transi- tory or partial ; from the unsettled state of Ger- many, those expelled from one province were preferred in another. More efficacious in produ- cing an at least external uniformity was the other measure of binding down the Protestant freedom by formulae, more and more closely rivetted, until the human mind could take no step except in the leading-strings of authority. Of these formulae, enacted for the most part for separate lands, the majority are known principally through the cata- rence to terms, and by the invidious use of the names of former heretics (see Schrockh, ib. 661-5.) ^ This is the more credible from the general vehemence of the Lutheran clergy. It is expressly mentioned by Schrockh in pal- liation. (Ib. 374, 5. 381, 2, &c.) Even within the Lutheran Church itself, we find the edict of Augustus, Elector of Saxony, forbidding all strife in the pulpit about the Adiaphorists, Majorists, and Synergists, regarded as an undue limitation of the pastoral office, and the Consistorium of Leipzig consulted whether such a command were unchristian. (Schr. ib. 612.) see also Henke, 3. 452. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 19 logues in which they are enumerated ^ ; they have perhaps an historical value, rather from the light which they cast upon the spirit of the times, than from any extensive influence which they exerted. More fatal, because more widely, and at last almost universally, received, was the for- mula of Concord. Until this was adopted, a certain latitude was still allowed by the symbo- lical books, though not indeed equal to that per- mitted by our own articles; notwithstanding some exceptions, still upon the whole, similarity of principle, rather than exact uniformity of ex- pression, or of minute mode of conception, was made the condition of belonging to the Lutheran conjmunion ; some points were left altogether undefined ; and the re-union of the Protestant churches, (which perhaps had never beei^ divided had Calvin, instead of Zwingli, been the original founder of the Reformed, or might have speedily again been blended, had Luther survived ^, when the fair prospect died away through the timidity ^ See Kocher Biblioth. Theol. Symbol, p. 114. Feuerlein Biblioth. Symb. Eccles, Luther. J. G. Walch Introd. in 1. Symbol. G. G. Meyer I. Symb. util. et Hist, subscript, eorund. Gott. 1796. It may suffice to name the Confutation-book of Weimar (1558) against the Synergists, the Symbol formed at Stuttgard (1559) enforcing the doctrine of the ubiquity of Christ's body, (Schr. ib. 606.) and the Corpus Doctrinse Pruthenicum against the Osiandrists. (1567.) ^ CaHxtus, whose accuracy is unquestioned, says that Luther became gradually more inclined to an union, (de Tolerantia Ref. ap. Schr. ib. 498. c2 20 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST of Melanchthon, and the vehemence of the ul- tra-Lutheran Westphal ') (1552) was still open, and might gradually have been effected by the mediation of the Crypto-Calvinists. The face of things was changed by the introduction of the formula of concord^. The moderate party of the Lutheran Church, which in accordance to Melanchthon's wise counsel confined itself to the Scriptural expressions on the communion, and which, though inferior, was still considerable ^, was annihilated, or passed into the Reformed Church ; the desirable union of the two churches in Germany itself, was for above two centuries and a half delayed. The immediate object of the new formula was indeed so far effected, that the existing contests were laid aside ; the scene of warfare, however, was changed, not peace produced^: struggles about the reception of the formula itself, about the altered and unaltered Augsburg Confession, and the contests with the reformed, succeeded ; so that the only permanent fruits of this restriction were, on the one hand, the exclusion of many who in principle agreed ^ Mosh. cent. xvi. iii. 2. c. 3. ^, 6. ^ In its first form as the Articles of Torgau, (1574) though such that the theologians of Wittenberg signed it at last, after undergoing imprisonment, only with restrictions, even it was deemed too favorable to the Crypto-Calvinists. Budd. ib. 433. = Schrockh, ibid. 623, 649. * Mosheim, ibid. c. 1. § 40. sq. Henke, ibid. 457, fgg. Budd, ibid. 435, sq. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 21 with the Lutheran doctrines ; on the other, the enforcement of the letter ' of the Lutheran tenets, ' It was a natural, though injurious, consequence of the great superiority of Luther, that every expression of his upon contro- verted points became a norm for the party, which, at all times the largest, was at last co-extensive with the Church itself. This almost idolatrous veneration was perhaps increased by the selec- tion of declarations of faith, of which the substance on the whole was his, for the Symbolical books of his Church. At least, it is remarkable, that in the Reformed Churches, where the original articles were not taken from the works of the chief founder, no such scrupulous adherence to the expressions of that founder ever existed. On the other hand even in the earlier Lutheran controver- sies, the question is often, not whether the tenet agree with Scrip- ture, but " whether it be a deflection from Luther's doctrine," — "whether the individual be fallen away from Luther," whether " if the expression be the same, it be used precisely in the sense of Luther," (e. g. of Osiander, Vat. 5, 229. Schr. ib. 577. so also in the collateral definitions on the sacrament.) " Much as both par- ties were indebted to Luther, it is still strange to see the constant reference in the one, not merely to what Luther taught, but what expressions, what grounds, what ideas he had on collateral points; and this with the view of not varying a hair's-breadth from him." (ib. 599.) These principles were made universal by the formula of Concord ; in this, ideas, which Luther had only thrown out in controversy, or had recalled, or which were at all events secondary only, became primary articles of faith ; till this was received, even the then symbolical books were not exclusively adopted; they appear in different countries with different modi- fications; and it was yet doubtfid whether the milder form in the Corpus DoctrinfTG Christiana3 Philippicum, and the Consensus Dresdensis, might not prevail. A greater freedom had occasion- ally been left; not only could Hardenberg declare, that on his appointment he had only bound himself to adhere to the Bible and the ancient Christian doctrine, (Schr. ib. 601.) but the synod of Hesse, in rejecting the formula of Concord, held the language, that it was not expedient that all the writings of 22 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST the establishment of mere scholastic opinions as articles of faith, the substitution of human tech- nicalities for the free spirit of the Gospel, of a logical formalism for the scriptural and living ex- pression of revealed truth. From the time that this formula was, through the influence of the Uni- versities, generally received, and the ultra Luthe- ran compendium of Hutter ^ substituted there as Luther, which were so unequal, should be thus extolled as rules of doctrine ; that the Evangelical Church had already been re- proached with submitting to a Babylonian captivity ; that no man should be so much trusted to the detriment of conscience, &c. (Schr. ib. 627.) After the second attempt to approximate to the Reformed doctrine, the formula of Concord was in Saxony further guarded (1592) by a new temporary symbolical book, the Visitation- Articel, for not subscribing which, many distinguished men, and among them the celebrated Schindler, who first pro- moted the enlarged study of Hebrew, were deposed. (Schrbckh ib. 660, 1. Budd. 440.) ^ This was not only introduced into all the schools of Saxony to the exclusion of every other, but was to be learnt by heart with the greatest accuracy practicable before going to the univer- sity. The spirit of the author may be judged of from his other works, as the Calvinista aulico-politicus, in which he warns the clergy of Brandenburg against the accursed Calvinism ; (Schrockh. ib. 385.) his loci Communes Theologici, whose object was to correct and replace the heresies of Melanchthon ; and his Cal- vinus Judaizans, hoc est Judaicse scholae et corruptelse, quibus J. Calvinus illustrissima S. S. loca et testimonia de gloriosissima Trinitate, Deitate Christi et Spiritus S. — detestandum in modum corrumpere non exhorruit." The ground of which charge was the greater discrimination, which Calvin employed in adducing evi- dence for the Trinity, and in admitting prophecies and types of Christ in the Old Testament. Asa system of theology, the work of Hutter is not sufficiently connected, is unpractical, and meagre : CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 23 the basis of instruction for the loci theologici of Melanchthon, nothing remained but to proceed onward in the groove into which they had been forced to enter, to develope in still greater minute- ness the fixed, immutable, definitions of the sanc- tioned form^ to offer solutions of its difficulties, and to refute its opponents. It was to be ex- pected from human nature, that party-spirit, thus fostered, should fail in none of its destructive effects. The circumstances of the age, as above observed, in themselves nurtured it ; it had already painfully manifested itself in the vehement con- tentions within the Lutheran church, in the refusal to admit to the Lord's table, or to grant honourable burial to those, who on some minuter speculative points disagreed ^ It did in fact in- as a compendium, it is burthened with over-refined discussions ; twenty pages being, for example, devoted to the developement of the doctrine of the imion of the two natures in Christ, and the communicatio idiomatum. It continued, however, for a century to be one of the most favourite compendia; (Langemack Hist. Cate- chet. P. iii. p. 13.) that, which was its principal object, to combat the errors of the Romanists and the Reformed, remaining during that period the almost exclusive aim of doctrinal theology. The principal commentators upon it are mentioned by Budd. Isag. p. 351. * Spener mentions that the symbolical books were often arbi- trarily adduced in support of deductions, of which their authors never thought, (ap. Weism. 1227.) ^ E. g. even laymen, who would not sign the confutation-book (against Synergism) were excluded from acting as sponsors, and even from honourable burial ; (Henke 3. 420) so were the non- Flacianists ; (Schr. ib. 571.) the Osiandrists by the opposed party of Morlin, (Vater, S. 223.) and the students of Wittenberg 24 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST crease. The monuments of that age, whether theological works, or the public opinions of the universities, are but too deeply stamped with it ; and agreeably to its genuine principles, the slightest approach to any tenet, or rite, or observ- ance, of the opposed party, or the faintest disap- probation of any of those questioned by that party in the Lutheran Church, were considered sufficient indications of the adoption of every tenet of that party. The disapproval of the rite of exorcism at baptism, of private confession before admis- sion to the Lord's table, of the decoration of churches with images, or the approval of the breaking of bread instead of the use of the wafer, the division of the Ten Commandments according to the Heidelberg, not according to the Lutheran, catechism, even the collocation of the two first words of the Lord's prayer, (" unser Vater" for * Vater unser,") were considered as sufficient in- dications of the reception of the whole system \ by the clergy of the Jena, unless after a formal renunciation of the corruptions there taught, (Id. S. 226.) ^ Vater, ib. S. 241. It is singular that of these rites, which now became criteria of Lutheranism, some had been before either rejected in the Adiaphoristic controversy, or re- tained for a time only to avoid offence. (Henke, ib. 470-2.) The very valuable remarks of AVhately on the abuse of party-feeling in religion, find ample illustration in those tim.os. It may be here mentioned in confirmation of the ill effect of the indiscriminate use of party names, that the application of that of Calvinist to all, v;ho in the slightest shade varied from the later Lutheran defi- nitions, (Henke, ib. 345.) considerably diminished the numbers of the exclusive party. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 25 The inevitable consequence was, that the parties thus accused of adopting the Reformed doctrines did actually approximate more nearly to them, and the remaining Lutherans became more rigid in their own system and their own peculiarities. The effect of this narrowing spirit, of these unceasing jarrings, could not but be injurious to the whole Lutheran theology. It is probably the unavoidable consequence of polemics, certainly of such polemics as these, that the question in dispute assumes an undue importance, that the mode of stating the truth, or some collateral points connected with it, more or less displace in the minds of the disputants the practical and re- ligious purport of the doctrines themselves, and their relation to the rest of the Christian system ; though in this relation alone, it can exert an efficacious, vital, and consistent influence. Every thing else is forgotten in the determination of the immediate controversy ; the conviction of the in- tellect becomes in itself the end ; the heart is forgotten in the exclusive employm.ent of the understanding. What, however, is perhaps only a tendency when other corrections are at hand, was realized in its whole painful extent in the practical as well as the scientific theology of Germany in the 17th century. In proof of this, it will be necessary briefly to consider the different branches of theology as they were, or were not, then studied. A vivid picture of the times can indeed be furnished by no general statement, but 26 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST must be obtained from the perusal of the authors themselves. Here the results only can be given. The Reformers, in consistency with their great tenet, that scripture is the only authoritative source of Christian knowledge, had laid the study of the sacred volume as the foundation of all Theological science. In the pursuance of this principle they had established as the rule of inter- pretation one which, when correctly developed, contains all the elements of right exposition, which have since been gradually vindicated by the combination of several partial efforts. Their, or rather the Biblical, rule, that " Scripture is its own interpreter," includes in itself the religious, historical, grammatical, elements, which were imperfectly, because separately, brought forward by Spener, Semler, and Ernesti. For it is obvi- ous that if scripture is to be understood from itself, those only can rightly and fully understand it who have a mind kindred to that of its author; as any human production, upon which the mind of its author is impressed, will be best understood by him, whose intellectual and moral character is most allied to the original which it expresses. The individual is thus placed, as it were, at the centre of the same circle, from which the views of the author emanated, and contemplates there- fore every part in the same order, harmony, and relation, of which they were originally possessed. In religious writings it is plain that the spirit re- quired is a religious spirit ; that none can truly CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 27 understand St. Paul or St. John, whose mind has not been brought into harmony with theirs, has not been elevated and purified by the same spirit with which they were filled : and this, unquestionably, was what the pious Spener meant by his much dis- puted assertion, that none but the regenerate could understand Holy Scripture. The same principle of the Reformers contained, further, the gramma- tical element, in that it directed, for the right un- derstanding of the several writers, to the constant comparison with themselves and with each other : views, which were subsequently lost, when it was deemed necessary to inspiration to maintain the perfect purity of the language of the New Testa- ment ^ Historical, finally, as opposed to the doc- trinal. Interpretation, was secured by the direct contrast of this self-illustration of Scripture to the decision of councils, and to the authority of Tradi- tion. If the theory were less distinctly stated, at least it was admirably exemplified in the translation of Luther, and the commentaries of Melanchthon; individual Christian knowledge enabled these Re- formers to perceive the fundamental distinctions of the two covenants, to determine what in the documents of the latter was occasioned by tem- porary events, and, above all, to avoid that iden- ^ It is remarkable, as illustrative of the comparative freedom of judgment in the two Protestant bodies, that the prejudice with regard to the purity of the language of the New Testament, and the importance attached to it, continued predominant among the Lutherans long after it had been extinguished among the Reformed. 6 28 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST tification, by which the full, and pregnant, and varying, language of Scripture is forced into the fetters of the narrowing and monotonous concep- tions of system. These principles of interpretation ^ were for- ^ The much abused doctrine that each passage of Scripture must be interpreted according to the analogia fidei, which was the basis of the dogmatical interpretation, appears as early as in the Clavis Scripturae Sacrse of the learned but bigoted Flacius. His maxim " omnia debent esse consona catechisticse, aut arti- culis fidei" entirely precludes all independent interpretation of Scripture from itself ; yet was it received unquestioned in the sys- tematic ultra- Lutheran school. Spener complains of the practice of many of the theologians of his day, who rather made the symbolical books the norm of interpreting Scripture, than Scrip- ture the norm of the symbolical books, (ap. Weism. 1227.) It is therefore natural though remarkaljle that the Lutheran inter- preters of the age immediately subsequent to Luther, who even now retain their value, Strigel, Camerarius, Chemnitz, belonged to the school of Melanchthon ; that with the cessation of that school, scriptural interpretation for a time ceased ; and that the only three who in the largest portion of the next century were at all distinguished, — J. Gerhard, Tarnov, and Hackspan, were depreciated by their contemporaries, the two latter on the especial account of occasional deviations from received interpretations, (on J. Gerhard, see Weismann (H. E. 2. 1127.) on Tarnov, Budd. Isag. (p. 1669.) on Hackspan and Tarnov, Schrockh (39. 429.) It attests the polemic character of the age that the chief subject of Scriptural exposition was the Apocalypse, (Schr. ib. 428.) and that principally in reference to the Romish Church. Bud- deus, speaking generally of the times subsequent to the Refor- mation, says, Hinc et multum lucis S. S. accessit ; licet amplius quid accedere potuisset, nisi simul ortee in religione dissensiones maximsB gravissimseque multorum animos partium studio infecis- sent, quo praepediti veritatem illis se oflerentem videre aut nolue- runt aut non potuerunt. Isig. 1453. § 12. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 29 gotten, this pre-eminence of scriptural above hu- man system strangely reversed by the successors of the Reformers. Scriptural interpretation, instead of being the mistress and guide, became the hand- maid, of doctrinal Theology. Its principal and nearly exclusive employment was the justification and defence of the Symbolical books by means of the oft-repeated exposition of the loci classici (beweis-stellen) for each of the positions therein contained, conveyed for the most part in the same technical language; nor was a departure from the received explanations of any of these passages, or a doubt as to the real applicability of one sanctioned as supporting a given doctrine, any more per- mitted than the rejection of the doctrine itself; or was thought, indeed, to involve it \ To this per- verted mode of interpretation some ground may have been laid in the Symbolical books themselves, especially in the formula of Concord, in which passages are quoted in proof, whose irrelevancy has been acknowledged by later Lutherans. False ideas of inspiration, introduced by the imaginary necessities^ of the argument with the Romanists, ^ This fact, which is indeed notorious, is directly asserted by Schrockh. 42, 557. and 43, 6. The influence attributed to the formula of Concord I find also in Meyer Gesch. der Schrifter- klarung. B. 2. S. 519. fg. ^ Bellarmine had inferred from the priority of the existence of the Church to that of Scripture, that the Church could not be founded upon it, but must be the judge and controller of it. The right answer had been that the Church was founded upon Apostolical doctrine, which was faithfully preserved in Scripture alone ; that tradition was indeed the foundation of faith, but not 30 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST contributed to the same result ; from the first assumption, that the whole of Scripture was imme- diately dictated by the Holy Spirit, was derived a second, that all must be of equal value : to prove this, it was supposed that the same doctrines, the same fundamental truths of Christianity, must be not implied merely, but expressed, by all ; a theory which must, of necessity, do much vio- lence to the sacred text, while it overlooked the beautiful arrangement, according to which the different doctrines of Revelation are each pro- minently conveyed by that mind, which was most adapted to its reception, (love, by St. John ; faith, by St. Paul ; hope, by St. Peter ; faith, developed in works by St. James ;) and thus the highest illu- mination of inspired minds, each in the fullest degree of which it was capable, are combined to convey to us the vast compass of Christian truth. Yet greater confusion must obviously be the re- sult of the same theory, when applied to the Old Testament. The difference of the law and the Gospel, which Luther had so vividly seen, was obliterated, the shadow identified with the sub- stance, the preparatory system with the perfect disclosure. Not content with finding the germs of Christian doctrine in the Old Testament, or those dawning rays, which were to prepare the as it had become Origenian, Gregorian, &c, but as it was Apos- tolical, i. e. in Holy Scripture, The answer given was, that as long as the Apostles spoke and taught, their individual agency mingled itself, but that when they began to write, they became the immediate agents and amanuenses of the Holy Spirit, CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 31 mental eye for the gradual reception of fuller light, but whose entire character could only be understood by those, who should witness the rising of that luminary whose approach they an- nounced ; they not only considered prophecy as being throughout an inverted history, but held that all the distinguishing doctrines of Christian- ity were even to the Jews as much revealed in the Old Testament as in the New, and that the knowledge of these doctrines was as necessary to their salvation as to ours j. No scientific error seems to have prepared so much for the subse- quent re-action, in which all prophecy was dis- carded, all doctrine considered to be precarious. It was assumed, further, in support of the same system, and was indeed the natural consequence of the doctrinal interpretation, that the same doc- trinal word, wherever it occurred, was employed in the same sense ; the sense, namely, attached to it in the symbolical books. The Scriptures thus handled, instead of a living Word, could not but become a dead repository of barren technicalities. Less important, lastly, though perhaps in its effects more immediately dangerous, was the corollary to the same theory of inspiration, that even his- torical passages, in which no religious truth was contained, were equally inspired with the rest, and consequently, that no error, however minute, could even here be admitted. Yet the imparting of religious truth being the object of revelation, any ' A proof of this will occur in the account of Calixtus, inf. 32 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST further extension of inspiration would appear an unnecessary miracle, as indeed it is one no where claimed by the writers of the New Testament. Violence was, in consequence, naturally dons to the language of Scripture ; it may suffice, as an instance, that sk is by these interpreters stated to be equivalent to ek. This, however, for the time, could produce no detrimental doctrinal result, yet in its palpable perversion of the doctrine of Inspiration it did prepare for the indiscriminate rejection of the doctrine itself. Not only, however, were the principles of scrip- tural interpretation perverted, but the study itself neglected. At the University of Leipzig, until Spener, one of whose great objects w^as the pro- motion of the study of the Bible, obtained a de- cree from the Elector, directing that an exegetical lecturer should be established, none were there delivered; nor was it without an open expression of bitterness against Spener, that the learned Carp- zov, who, on a former occasion, had been com- pelled, for want of hearers, to abandon his lecture on Isaiah, before he had concluded the first chap- ter, resumed the attempt ^ Spener himself men- tions, that he knew theologians, who during a six years' course of study at universities, had not heard a single exposition of any biblical book. The unpractical and untenable character of the doctrinal theology of the same century will have ^ Cansteia'a Leben Speners, ed. Lange. S. 119. ap Schrockh, 43, 267. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 33 been partly anticipated from what has been al- ready said on the controversies and the scriptural interpretation of the times. It was in fact, for the most part, but a connected polemic ; which again, by the method in which it was handled, contri- buted to reinstate the extremest dryness of scho- lastic formalism. This method, indeed, was ori- ginally reintroduced by contests not so immedi- ately connected with the present view, those with the Romanists, and especially with the Jesuits, who employed the same weapons * ; but it gained yet greater admission in controversy with individuals, who (as some inclined to the reformed doctrine in the Lutheran Church) endeavoured to conceal diversity of doctrine under similarity of terms. In order to maintain the distinction which it was thought necessary to perpetuate, yet nicer and minuter distinctions were to be adopted, and the contrast of the two systems pursued to its re- * Mosheim, c. 16. s. 3. p. 2, § 19. Budd. Isag. p. 239. and 249, (who, following Elsevich de varia Aristot. in scholis Protes- tant, fortuna, p. 75, dates the influx of scholasticism from the conference of Ratisbon, 1601.) and Twesten's Dogmatik, S. 235, a work, of which the first volume, which appeared in 1826, is one of the most valuable productions of the new German theology, uniting philosophic depth with pure Christian faith, and which promises, if continued, to form an era in the doctrinal theology of that country. The view of the character of Protestantism, and of its successive stages in Germany, § 8 — 12, as well as that of doctrinal theology from Melanchthon to the present time, § 13, fgg. though concise, touches in a masterly manner on all the principal points of the enquiry, and has been partly followed by, partly found to coincide with the previous views of, the writer of this essay. D 34 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST motest consequences \ It were then almost needless to state, that not even a wish for free- dom of enquiry existed ; that the Lutheran sys- tem, instead of being freed from those errors or unscriptural appendages, which were blended with its basis of scriptural truth, or existed only in the mode of stating what was purely scriptu- ral, was developed, and carried to a precarious height, by increased yet consistent speculation ; yet the higher the system was carried, the more dangerous was a return ; the fabric was ready to fall by its own weight, yet any attempt to lighten it might only precipitate the evil. The virtual claim of infallibility (which is perhaps natural to every long established, unaltered, Church) was in this case strengthened by the perverted system of Scriptural interpretation. Revelation being inter- preted according to the analogy of Faith, or, what was then equivalent, according to the doctrinal system of the Church, could furnish no other result than that which already existed. It was referred to for the justification of preconceived and predeter- mined opinions. The separation, further, by Calixtus of the system of "Christian moral" from ^' Christian doctrine," with which it had been hitherto inter- woven, though in itself greatly to the advantage of the unity of the latter science, seems to have produced at the time no effect, but that of extin- guishing even the sense of the necessity of pre- senting it in a form influential upon the Christian ' Twesten, ibid. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 35 life. Abounding then in technical formulae, (whether from the Aristotelic-scholastic philoso- phy, or from the scholastic theology) in straw- splitting distinctions, in endless problems and deductions, the systems of the age were rather a massive repertorium of all which might be accumulated on doctrinal theology, than a clear exposition of Christian doctrine itself. No unfavourable specimen of the method is the " systema locorum theologicorum" of the un- doubtedly learned Calov^ Though he asserts, that he has aimed at conciseness in the questions discussed, the work consists of fourteen quarto volumes ; its polemical spirit may be in some measure conceived, in that even the first part, whose professed subject is *' the nature of Theo- logy, Keligion, divine Revelation, Holy Scripture, and articles of Faith generally," decides that the reformed are to be reckoned among the Heretics, who hold dangerous errors ; (Qu. 14, p. 251) and that they are no members of the Augsburg Confes- sion ; (Qu. 21, p. 259) and closes with a long censure (p. 881 — ^1216) of the various errors of Calixtus It is no sufficient apology for the defects of this age to in- sist upon the learning of many of the individuals, who are in- volved in them. In their mass of knowledge they are equal, often superior, to those of other ages ; their deficiency was in the want of scientific spirit, of freedom from prejudice, of comprehensive and discriminating views, without which mere knowledge is use- less to the cultivation of science, and oppressive to its possessor. Gerhard's loci Theologici must be excepted from this con- demnation, as indeed he himself lived at the commencement of this age. D 2 36 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST and his followers. But indeed it is superfluous to state the polemical and bitter character of the work of one, who deemed it necessary to refute, step by step, the commentary of Grotius. The book it- self enjoyed all the distinction of its author, until the growing disapprobation of the love of strife, and of a needless creation of heresies, deeply sunk it. The mode of arranging and of handling the matter thus accumulated, would hardly find place in the present argument, but that it completes the proof of the uninteresting and abstract form with which the whole science was invested. Two fa- vourite methods then of arrangement prevailed, which were for the most part carried through with unvarying uniformity ; the causal, and the defining method. The first consisted in enquiring upon each article what were the causse principales, et minus principales, instrumentales, efficientes, materiales, formales, finales, &c. (that adopted in the above Systema of Calov) ; the second in premising to each article a definition, which should at the same time comprise the whole doc- trine of the Church, and all the opposed here- sies : this was then illustrated according to its several parts, was further subdivided, or gave occa- sion to new definitions, till the whole subject was supposed to be exhausted. Each article was thus split into numerous theses, antitheses, distinc- tions, questions, objections, &c. * Not the ob- * Tweslen. 236. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 37 sourest nor the most abounding in metaphysical terminology is the " Systema Theologise 29 Defi- nitionibus absolutum of J. A. Scherzer; in which the definition concerning Christ occupies three quarto pages in a single period. It thus com- mences, p. 172, sqq. Christus est 9eav9po)7roc, Deus scilicet (etiam avroQeog) et homo, Patri in coelis et matri Virgini (ut Virgo revera deoroKog et Chris- tus etiam secundum humanitatem Filius Dei na- turalis sit,) (in terris o^xoovaiog) constans in unione ad unam personam, (propter quam unionem etiam secundum humanam naturam Filius Dei natu- ralis, non adoptivUS est) [a]7re^iyo)phwg, aavyyvTUig, aTpeTTTiog, a^iaaTciTwg, a^wpfewc, facta, natura divma et humana impeccabili, &c.^ Yet these books satis- lied all the wants of that age ; an acquaintance with the scholastic terminology, and the topics of controversy, with a copious collection of Biblical passages, whose relevance was a point of inferior importance to their numbers was all which the ordinary Theologian required ; and the favourite class-book of the age, that most frequently com- mented upon, and orally expounded, was the dryest and the most meagre, Kbnig's ^ Theologia positiva acroamatica synoptice tractata, 1GQ4:. ^ Ap. Schrockh, B. 43, S. 10, 1 1. There seem to be some mis- prints, which, not having the original, T cannot correct, but which do not affect the object for which it is quoted. ^ Buddeus, p. 359, calls it " Skeleton quoddam sine succoet san- guine;" and adds that Konig heaps unnecessarily metaphysical terms, sometimes incorrectly, and adduces irrelevantscriptural pas- sages, and he aUributes its celebrity solely to the then prevalence of 38 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST " Christian morals/' though separated, as above stated, by Calixtus from doctrinal theology, with which it had been joined rather than combined, (the Christian duties being treated of under the head of the " law" in a species of exposition of the Deca- logue ; Ihe principle of Christian virtue under the article of Sanctification and the new Obedience^;) made, as a science, no progress, and was, for the most part, but a relic of the old casuistry ^ One work alone (Schomer's Specimen Theologiae Mo- ralis, 1690) contained any traces of scientific me- thod. The rest are very moderate productions. *'In the midst of the vehement Theological contro- versies (says the ecclesiastical historian ^) which Scholastic Theology. The works which, according to Twesten S. 237, are best calculated to give an image to the Doctrinal Theology of that period, Quenstedt's Theologia didactico-polemica, of the larger, and Baler's Compendium, of the smaller, " are destitute, not indeed of diligence, acuteness, order, and precision, but of un- prejudiced scriptural interpretation, philosophical depth, and reli- gious warmth." Quenstedt accounts all, even the most distin- guished Theologians, as heretics, who differ in any point, however slight, from those of Wittenberg ; Baier can scarcely be under- stood without a previous thorough knowledge of the then contro- versies. Budd. ibid, J Twesten, p. 235. ^ Schrbckh, B. 42, p. 558. ^ Schrockh, B. 43, p. 86. Buddeus states the same fact and the same ground for the degeneracy and defects of books of edification. Fuit ceteroquin jam seculo sexto ea temporum infe- licitas ut in certamina et intestlnas dissensiones raperentur prse- stantissima ingenia; unde contingebat ut qui vitee morumque prsecepta inculcabant, minus sapere viderentur. Contemptus ejusmodi librorum, (he adds,) inde auctus est, quod pauci rem CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 39 then divided the whole Evangelical Church, was neither time nor room for the scientific treating of theological moral." A scholastic age has but little feeling for his- torical enquiry ; the neglect, which it experienced in the age of the original schoolmen, again re- curred. What did exist was either a mere justifi- cation of Protestantism, or historical notices of the contests between the Lutherans and the Re- formed ; or if more extensive, a catalogue of heretics, which, because opposed to the then orthodoxy, were now also condemned. Yet, for the most part, in the 17th century, the study of ecclesiastical history was, as Spener again com- plains, at least at the Universities, extinct. The evil consequences of this neglect were subse- quently severely felt ; history and historical cri- ticism broke upon the age, in which the system began to give way, with a dazzling and perplexing, because unaccustomed, light; they were thought to be, (as indeed every science has been in its first imperfect commencement,) and indeed were in their then state of cultivation, adverse to Ptevela- tion. Ignorance of ecclesiastical history had nega- tively also a detrimental effect ; to minds engaged solely in speculation, and accustomed to no system foreign to their own. Christian antiquity wore a strange and unintelligible aspect; unable to divest serio agere, plurimi contra aut ad gloriolam aut ad lucrum cap- tandum, aut ut mori rccepto aliquid darent, talia scribcrc crede- rentur. Isa"-. 588. 40 CAUSES OF THE 1>ATE RATIONALIST themselves of modern ideas, or to transport them- selves into times externally so different, the past was to them as a sealed book, and was laid aside without further investigation ; the pride of sup- posed superiority above all preceding times, (the natural consequence of re-awakening energy com- bined with this ignorance of what antiquity pos- sessed of deeper truth,) was thereby nourished and promoted. Yet was this pride the basis of many of their errors : hence arose the presumptuous contempt with which sentence was passed upon all earlier modes of expression of Christian feeling ; hence doctrines, in which the most pious men of old had found the source and nourishment of their piety, were, in the name of eternal reason, determined a priori to be prejudicial even to mo- rality ; and hence the various and confused dreams of the perfectibility of Christianity. A large por- tion, also, of Christian evidence was lost, from the consequent failure to understand the manner, in which the influence of Christianity exerted itself. Equally a consequence of the same neglect was the positive error of, unconsciously at least, theorizing on events, ideas, persons, of antiquity, as if in all respects similar to those of modern times ; with a little modification, the well-known severe terms of Gothe would apply to many besides the wretched Bahrdt, Da kam mir ein Gedanke von ungefahr, So redete ich, wenn ich Christus ware '. The Theological sciences, whose application ^ In Lis Baliidt. CHARACTER 0¥ THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 41 forms the basis of practical Theology, being thus perverted or obliterated ; the exposition of Scrip- ture, and Christian doctrine converted into pole- mics; ecclesiastical history, so pre-eminently the magistra vitae, and Christian Moral, forgotten ; it could scarcely be but that this crown, as it has been justly called, of all theology ^ should equally suffer. From the nature, however, of Pastoral Theology, those two portions alone which partake of a scientific character, the pul- pit and catechetical instruction, can furnish results sufficiently definite or universal, from which to attempt, without risk of injustice, to form an estimate of the general condition of the whole church. Each of these was injured by the predominant importance attached to controverted points. Elementary instruction, as far as other interests permitted it still to be cultivated, was perverted from its proper object, the communica- tion of the essentials of Christianity, to the en- forcement of the system of the Church in the immense compass of its abstract articles. Illus- tration and defence of contested points displaced the inculcation of vital truths in their practical import; the inexperienced mind was oppressed and bewildered by the exposition of points which belonged only to systematic Theology ^ ; the er- ^ Schleiermacher Darstell. des Theol. Studiums, § 8. "^ See Schrockh (43, 154.) who mentions that in the illustra- tion of many Catechisms of this age, one, or even several oc- tavo volumes, filled with a complete doctrinal systen), were emj.'Ioycd. 42 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST ror, at all times natural to the human mind, of regarding religion as a matter of memory, was rendered almost inevitable by the indiscriminate mode in which the whole sum of doctrine was propounded. Yet more common, however, was the opposed extreme, by which catechizing, was either, as in the original scholastic age \ neglect- ed, or was committed to subordinate persons, as a mere mechanical labour. In Saxony, which more indeed than the rest of Germany was the seat of a dead orthodoxism, it was not without much ridicule that Spener, when appointed Court- Preacher and member of the Consistory at Dres- den, revived it ^ ; not without the taunt that " the elector had sent for a Court-Preacher, and had received a school-master." Yet to this failure of catechising, whatever success unbelief had among the lower and middling classes (positive unbelief was, however, among them rare) is far more attributable, than to any direct attempts of a later unbelieving clergy or of profligate Rational- ist writers ^ The house was swept and gar- * Catecheticse Theologise, says Buddeus (Isag. p. 332,) eo tempore quo scholasticum illud regnum floruit, nulla fere habita fuit ratio; ideoque hinc inde quaedam solum ejus vestigia depre- hendere licet. Id quod, (he truly adds, and it is a warning cri- terion for every age,) corruptee admodum ac depravatae liisce seculis ecclesise documentum prsebet luculentum. ^ Schrockh, ibid. ^ This subject veill occur more fully hereafter; here it may suffice to notice that Bahrdt, the only one of the infidel writers who had any influence on the middling classes, was no Theolo- gian, His frivolity and charlatanisu), combined with powers of CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 43 nished; it was abandoned, empty, and undefended ; it remained but for the master to enter in. The coldness of unbelief is preferable to the luke- warmness of such a state, in that it is more easily recoverable. Not neglected, indeed, but for the most part des- titute of practical spirit, was the other ordinary me- dium of Christian instruction, the pulpit. The dif- ferent proportions which the several parts of divine service bear in Germany, (where the prayers, in- cluding the hymns, occupy a much smaller space, and much less of Scripture is read than among ourselves), have from the beginning given a pri- mary importance to this ministerial intercourse of the pastor with his flock ; and this the more, as the occasions of these addresses are more fre- quent, in that they are delivered at all the occa- sional services, — baptism, marriage, burial of the dead, and the public confessional on the day pre- paratory to the participation in the communion, as well as at confirmation, and in the ordinary service of the Lord's day. Luther, accordingly, who knew and assigned it its importance, pu- rified it from all its previous defects, and pro- vided in his Kirchenpostille, which he deemed his best work \ a model for future preachers. The interest of polemics seems, however, soon to have imagination and an easy style, gave him, for a time, access and popularity among the superficial, who were willing to be deceived. He had, however, no share in the Theological revolutions of the period. ^ Schrbckh, 39. 4G0. 4i CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST swallowed up every other ; nor, with the excep- tion of Mathesius, does the name of any distin- guished preacher occur among the successors of Luther. Of those who wrote on the theory of Christian oratory, a disciple of Melanchthon's alone. Hemming ^ extended his views beyond the mere external arrangement. The history of every controversy after the Reformation gives the proof that intemperate disputation on abstract questions had largely displaced Christian instruc- tion. Early in the seventeenth century this be- came systematic ; the preacher not unnaturally taught that, in which alone he had been himself instructed, and which he had been inured to think of primary or exclusive importance ; he delivered it in the same scht)lastic terminology in which he had himself received it^ Not orthodoxy, then, was wanting in the sermons of the seventeenth century, but the developement of that orthodoxy in its influence on Christian practice. Moral, when preached, being separated from implied, equally as from express, reference to the Christian truths, was dry and barren ; and the acknowledgment of these truths manifested itself solely in the refuta- tion of heretics. The sermons printed by James Andrea, minister at Erlangen, 1568, may furnish a specimen of the usual subjects of these dis- courses. They consist of four divisions ; 1. Of the division between Lutherans and Papists ; 1 In his Pastor, 1566. See Schrockh, 464. Other defects are mentioned by Schrockh, ib. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 45 2. Of the Church of Christ and the Zwiiiglians ; 3. Against the Schwenkfeldians ; 4. Against the Anabaptists. To shew the spirit of these pole- mics, may suffice the following commencement of those of Artomedes of Konigsberg (1590) on the Lord's Supper. " Against the holy Communion war two raging armies of the incarnate devil ; on the one side the ungodly Papists, on the other the over- curious and conceited Calvinists. The wretched heathen Ovid is a better theologian than our Calvinists." There follow yet stronger and more offensive expressions. The style was equally repulsive. The ordinary divisions were a dry grammatical exposition of Scriptural texts, and a polemical or so-called practical application, equally uninteresting and uninfluential. It is of course impossible to multiply instances ; suffice one of Hermann of Brieg in Silesia, on the Gos- pel of the day, the history of Zacchseus. The text selected was, " He was little of person." The division of the sermon was, 1. The word " He" teaches us, "persones qualitatem;" 2. " was," " vitse fragilitatem ;" 3. " little," " staturse parvita- tem." The practical application was, 1. Zacchceus est informator de varietate operum Dei ; 2. conso- lator parvorum ; 3. adhortator ut defectum nos- trum virtute compensemus. There were indeed some splendid exceptions of men, as Arndt ', J. V. Andrea, and J. Gerhard, who kept aloof from ' Arndt's '' True Christianity" was the substance of his ser- mons. His lectures on Luther's Catechism are also a memorial of his practical piety. 6 46 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST polemics, and whose piety has been venerated by every subsequent age, and has edified many other churches \ ** But these instances," adds the his- torian, " besides that they were exceptions from the usual course, influenced the whole but little ; and Homiletic "remained a science almost entirely unknown to those who deemed that they most excelled in it ^." More, however, of the scientific and practical defects, or rather offences, of the theological pre- paration of that age, may be learnt from the testi- monies of two men of very different characters, Spener and Thomasius ; the former a divine, mildly mourning in heartfelt pain over the decay of piety, and of the practical study of theology ; the latter, the celebrated reformer of the evange- lical ecclesiastical law, with some, though not un- deserved, mockery. Spener, in his Pia Desideria, and the preface to Dennhauer's Hodosophia, gives the following account of the preparatory and pro- fessional studies of theologians. " In the semi- naries for the most part, Latin alone is taught ; Greek extremely seldom ; Hebrew not at all : persons come to the Universities without having an idea of the nature of Theology, which is consi- ' Gerhard's Meditations is, with Arndt's Christianity, among the few books which have been valued by every age and country. Buddeus (ib. 588.) mentions translations into German, French, English, Polish, and Swedish. ^ Christian rhetoric, the art of preaching, of Christian persua- sion and instruction, ' Schrockh, ib. 468. CHARACTER Of THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 47 dered a mere matter of memory ; hence all prayer, all meditation, all attention to a holy life, is want- ing. Philosophy is a dry scholastical assemblage of formulas ; to it is most time devoted. Philo- logy is almost unknown. Many theologians do not understand the New Testament in Greek. The most important Theological science is thetik (doctrinal Theology in its confined sense) ; scrip- tural grounds for the doctrines are not deemed necessary. Scriptural interpretation is learnt after entering- on the office of preacher, in order to write the expository part of the sermon, which contains a mere dialectical explanation. Next to thetik is polemic ^ the most important science, though it is melancholy to contend against error when one knows not the truth. And if polemic must be carried on, yet should it be as in the state, where one class only is engaged in war. Ethics are not taught at all ; homiletic consists only in a philosophical schematism, how a sermon is logi- cally to be arranged." The remarks of Thomasius are conveyed in the following description of a candidatus theologiae". " He has for two years ^ '* Joined with doctrinal Theology," (says Schrockh, describ- ing this age, 39. 482, sq.) " was polemic theology considered the highest dignity of the theologian ; and, under a biblical expres- sion, * to carry on the wars of the Lord,' was the field in which he most readily appeared, fully armed for the defence of the pro- vince entrusted to him. That such a constant readiness and in- clination to fight, often, as in the political world, brought on wars which might easily have been avoided, cannot be denied." " '* In his Freymiithige lustige uud crnsthafte, jcdoch Venuinft- 4-8 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST studied the Aristotelic philosophy ; in the third, positive theology ; in three more, that of the schoolmen ; and in the four last, which he has spent at the University, polemic : he has held a long disputation on the use of metaphysics in the refutation of heretics ; is able, by means of those different species of theology, the concordance, and the skeletons, to give, at an hour's preparation, a well constituted sermon ; is employed, besides, on a refutation of that infernal book, Ric. Simonis Critical History of the Old Testament; but in practical or moral theology is an entire stranger." No wonder then that Spener should meet at least with assent in his earnest regrets, which he ex- pressed, however, with his peculiar mildness^: " That the clergy needed an entire reformation, and so much the more, in that their defects were not acknowledged; that many of them were wholly strangers to earnest inv/ard piety, conceiving that every thing was comprised in skill in religious disputation ; that much foreign useless matter, many needless niceties, had been introduced into theology ; whence many theologians, when they attained an office, could make no use of what they had learnt ; that it wvas necessary to study holy Scripture with much more diligence than had und Gesetzmiissige Gedanken iiber allerhand, fUrnemlich aber neue, Biicher." ap. Schitickh, 42, 561. * See the observations of Weism. ib. 1168, sq. where, in praising Spener's great wisdom and moderation, he mentions that many thought rather that he did too little than too much. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 49 been hitherto done, to put a due limit to reli- gious controversies, and to educate and form future ministers upon an entirely different plan, reminding them, that much more depended upon a pious life than upon their diligence and study ; lastly, that sermons should be made more useful'." No wonder that H. Midler should speak against the four dumb church-idols, the font, the pulpit, the confessional, and the communion-table ^ ; or that the result should be that described by the truly pious, able, and learned Joh. Gerhard, " that the most diligent church-goers were guilty of the most reckless practices; but if one did not admit them to be good Christians, they threatened an action for libel, and whoever re- commended earnest Christianity, was termed Pha- risee, Weigelian, and Rosecrucian^." Such a system could not endure ; it contained within itself the seeds of its own dissolution ; a ' Pia desideria ap. Schrbckh, ib. p. 549. "^ The censures passed upon him by Joh. Mviller of Hamburg for these expressions seemed, even to those times, captious and unjust. Fateor (says Weismann, ib. p. 1143) multum hujus viri existimationi apud me detrahere acta ejus eristica, et plane superflua, cum optimo Viro, H. Mullero, cui plures alii et cele- bres nostroe Ecclesiee Theologi assistebant contra censuram Ham- burgensem. Cp. Buddeus, who mentions some of his defenders, and says, that his writings omnium fere promeruerunt calculum (ib. 590.) H. Miiller's Erquickungsstunden, especially, long continued to be one of the principal practical works of Germany. ' The evidences on this head will hereafter be occasionally in- creased by the incidental mention of some of the innovations in doctrines which the ultra- Lutheran party opposed. E 50 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST re-action was almost the unavoidable conse- quence, unless some one, or some succession of men, gifted with Luther's pious and discriminat- ing mind, should establish a separation between this accumulation of narrowing human definitions and the simple truths of the Gospel, should re- place by the influential faith of the heart the barren contentious scholasticism, by which the understanding alone was occupied, or rather was distracted. It was the natural effect of a system, in itself partly untenable, and of which every un- tenable point was developed to its utmost extent by other deductions and hypotheses, to provoke the inconsiderate rejection of a whole, whose every part was maintained with equal decision, and as of equal importance; it was the direct tendency of the endless disputes about abstract points, in which the different parties were agreed about nothing, but that unquestioned certainty might be arrived at, and that they were each in possession of that certainty, that distaste and doubt of the whole should be engendered ; it was the natural consequence of so vast a system of abstract doctrine, apparently influential in the production of discord alone, that the authority of the whole should be questioned : to what pur- pose, it would be asked, should so vast a body of doctrine be made known to mankind, some of which in its own nature can have no influence, and the rest has none ? doubt of the whole would further be excited by the manifestly weak or distorted basis, upon which much was rested ; CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 51 aversion would be created by some unscriptural doctrines, repugnant to the nature of God ' ; op- position by the intolerance of their supporters ^ : there are few probably who would not have been confirmed in their difficulties by such an anta- gonist as Goze, who seems to have sought a triumph over, rather than the conviction of his sceptical, but probably more Christian^ opponent. It may suffice to mention that of the eternal condemnation of the heathen, which appears to have been generally held by the orthodox. This appears more strikingly from the fact that Schrockh uniformly mentions as a peculiarity in the system of any doctrinal writer, even a doubt of its truth, than from any number of instances with which I may myself have met. To give one instance, Schrockh names as a freedom of opinion in Spener, unexpected in his times, and which, therefore, was interpreted to his injury, that " he doubted not that even out of the Evangeli- cal Church, not children only, but many of maturer age, would be saved." (Theol. Bedenken ap. Schr. 43, 281.) The mainte- nance of the contrary opinion gave rise to one infidel work at least, Eberhard's Neue Apologie des Socrates ; even Ernesti ex- presses a doubt whether the happiness of virtuous heathens and Jews be consistent with the importance of the Christian Revela- tion. Neue Theol. Biblioth. 1. B. S. 105. 5. B. S. 359. * This is mentioned by Schlegel also (Kirchengesch, 5. B. S. 247.) as one of the causes of the unbelief of the 18th century in Germany. ' I know not any man whose scepticism gives one more pain, excites more regret, than that of Lessing. His works manifest a conscientious desire after truth, a struggle to extricate himself from his difficulties ; he first pointed out the impregnable bulwark of religion against all scientific objections, which has since been philosophically justified, that the foundation, the original seat of religion is in the feeling, not in the understanding. Without subscribing to every thing contained in the following passages, it E 2 52 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST Other causes actually coincided, but these fur- nished a well prepared soil for the seed of unbe- may be permitted to cite them, to shew what the heart of the in- dividual was, whom the unhappy circumstances of his time, and the intolerance of his opponents seem mainly to have driven into scepticism. They are collected in the often-quoted work, Twes- ten's Dogmatik, p. 19. Under the word " Religion," (in his post- humous works) he says, " The many works which in modern times appear in defence of the Christian religion, are open to the objection, not only that they prove very ill what they undertake to prove, but that they are quite contrary to the spirit of Christi- anity, in that its truth is such as rather to be felt, than to be made an object of intellectual knowledge." (Collectan. Werke, Th. 1 6. S. 305.) Hence, (observes T.,) he makes a clear distinction be- tween the Theologian and the Christian ; the former, he supposes, may be perplexed by certain objections, which threaten to shake the props by which he would support religion, " but what do this man's hypotheses, and explanations, and proofs, concern the Christian ?" He possesses already the Christianity which he feels to be so true, and in which he himself is so blessed. When the paralytic experiences the beneficial shocks of the electric spark, what matters it to him whether Nollet, or Franklin, or neither, be in the right ? (Zusatze zu der Wolf. Fragm. Werke, Th. 5. S. 18.) To the same purport against Goze. (Th. 6. S. 16.) " Even supposing one should not be able to remove all the objec- tions, which reason is so busy in making against the Bible, yet religion would still remain undisturbed and unconcerned in the hearts of those Christians, who had attained an inward feeling of its essential truths." Again, Axiomat. (Th. 6. S, 77.) " He, whose heart is more Christian than his head, pays not the slightest regard to those objections, since he feels what others content themselves with thinking." (cp. S, 139, at greater length.) " This appeal (adds T.) to the feeling of the facts of inward Christianity is Lessing's leading idea in the contest with Gbze ; and how much he was in earnest, might be shewn from many passages of his writings, and the whole frame of his mind." CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 53 lief, under whatever immediate circumstances it might be planted. The first opposition to this system, however, came from other quarters. It seems as if it were not until other methods had been employed in vain, that the storm of unbelief was allowed to burst over so much of this fair portion of the Christian Church ; not until they had refused to return from the light of their self-kindled fire, to the sun of pure Christianity ; that that sun was for a time obscured to them, in order that the temporary privation might make them more deeply feel its value, and benefit by its light and warmth and healing. In the very beginning of the 1 7th century, the destructive effects ^ of the existing system in sub- stituting dialectic disquisition for practical Chris- tianity, had been felt by two theologians, Praetorius, minister of Salzwedel, (ob. 1610), and the ever- memorable and pious Arndt. (ob. 1611). The lat- ter alone had a very wide permanent influence ^ of ib. p. 20. The late Rennell (Notes on the Conversion of Count Struensee, p. 20,) and Coleridge (Aids to Reflection, p. 136,) have given seasonable advice to those, who think that in the reception of Christianity the intellect alone is concerned. ^ Arndt's " true Christianity" was occasioned by the prevailing corruptions ; its object was to shew that " true Christianity con- sists in the manifestation of a true, living, active, faith, in genuine piety, and the fruits of righteousness." Buddeus in the passage following that quoted Sup. p. 38. n. 3. assigns the exclusive polemic as the source of these corrupt manners. ^ Spener, however, in his candid judgment of Prtetorius, mentions the *' very many instances of })ious and orthodox men, 54 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST which, however, as is generally the case of the most extensive usefulness, the largest results were late, and long after his own personal removal^ In his life-time, though he united all the humility and mildness of Spener with the firmness in which the latter was deficient, though he entered not into the polemics of his time, and his exertions were calculated to replace, not to overthrow, the existing system, he was the object of dislike and persecution. Even while these exertions were limited to the exercise of his ministry, he was ac- cused of the heresy of requiring from Christians Angelic perfection, and of practising alchemy ; his extensive benevolence was attributed to the discovery of the philosopher's stone. The clergy of Brunswick issues warnings against the " poison" of Arndt^ The immortal work on " True Chris- tianity," (1605), which was translated into every language of Europe, and has been valued by pious minds of every succeeding age, did but increase the hostility. A host of antagonists charged him with heresy, termed his writings jugglery, him- self an unlearned presuming fool ^ L. Osiander who, next to Scripture, ascribe almost all their Christian know- ledge to him," ap. Weism., 1193. 1 Weism., 1178. S. 8. * Weism., ib. 1175. ' The names of some of his opponents may be found in Weism. 1176, and Budd.,ib. 614. Though a few were distinguished in the controversies of their time, they have long been forgotten. They were mostly inferior, even in learning, to the great man whom they reviled. See Schrockh 39,450, and Weism. 1174, who CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 55 pronounced, that they could not be read by the ignorant without risk of salvation ; that they were full of heretical poison, pestilential, abounding in Papism, Calvinism, Flacianism, Schwenkfeldian- ism, and Weigelianism ^ He accused him of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, and of ascrib- ing the agency of God to the devil ; by others were added Osiandrism, Paracelsism, and the use of the language of the mystico-chemical philoso- phers ^ ; it was made a crime that he did not bind himself, in his religious teaching, to the symbo- lical formulae ; he was charged with using expres- sions in common with earlier mystics or fanatics, who had spoken against a bare outward Church formalism ^ These imputations in part refuted themselves, in part did not need refutation ; he was cleared of all error of moment by subsequent divines of his own Church^; and his own valuable speaks of his " eruditio plane singularis et arcana etiam in par- tibus doctrinee Theologiam non concernentibus." The source of the accusation was, that he did not employ it in the same osten- tatious and unedifying manner which was usual in the sermons of the time. (See Schrbckh, ib. 464.) ^ In his " Theologisches Bedenken und Christlich treu-herzig Erinnerung, welcher Gestalt Arndt's wahres Christenthum nach Anleitung des Heiligen Worts zu betrachten sey." 1623. Weis- mann, however, mentions, that he is said to liave retracted at the approach of death, (ib. 1176.) ^ Mosheim, c. 17. 11. 2. 1. 39. Weismann, 1. c. ^ Vater, p. 258 — 9. Weism. (p. 1177), as well as others ap. Budd. 613, doubts not that he conferred a benefit on the Church by extracting and combining with Scripture what was really solid and useful in the mystic or practical authors. * Besides others who vindicated him, among whom was the 56 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST work has, in better times, produced far more than a mere negative testimony. His principal imme- diate influence, however, seems to have been among the laity ^ : upon the system of the German Church he acted most extensively through the formation of the mind of Spener, whose character was principally framed by the early study of Arndt's " True Christianity V in combination with two English works. The thirty last years, however, of the half-cen- tury, which intervened between the death of Arndt and the commencement of Spener's public exertions, witnessed an attack upon the system on the scientific side, which, however its immediate operation was annihilated by the heat of the par- ties, prepared for its subsequent downfal by lead- ing to historical enquiry, to a better scriptural in- terpretation, and to a more practical view of con- troversy. valuable J. Gerhard, who regarded him as a second parent, (Weisra. 1177) the praise of the otherwise bigoted Hulsemann, the bitter opponent of Calixtus, of Dannhauer, (at first prejudiced against Luther as well as against Arndt,) and of M. Geier, who attributes to his work his own real Christianity, will be above sus- picion of undue attachment. (Weism., ib. cp. Budd. 614.) ' Two highly-gifted authors, however, were formed by him ; Scriver (Superintendant at Magdeburg, died at Quedlinburg, 1693, as first court-preacher,) whose Seelenschatz, or Consi- derations on Doctrine and Morals, was one of the most valued edifying books of the time: (Schrockh, B. 42. p. 87.) and H. Midler of Rostock, already mentioned. ^ Spener mentions that Arndt was the only modern besides Luther, whom he quoted by name in his preaching, (ap. Weism. 1192.) CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 57 Nearly coincident with the conckision of the unequalled horrors of the thirty years' war, (a war whose length and miseries might long before have been closed but for the disunion of the two Protestant parties, and the jealousy of a Lu- theran court-preacher and adviser of Joh. George I. of Saxony '), was the signal for the Syncretis- ' The principles expressed on this occasion, alone, entitle it to notice. M. Hoe von Hoenegg, the individual in question, per- suaded his patron, that " an union with the Papists was better and safer than one with the reformed," (Leyser Bedenken daruber von Hoe herausgeg, 1619. &c. ap. Henke, iii. 487.) and that Bo- hemia " should not be exposed to be devoured by the Calvinistic Antichrist;" (Hoe's letter in Unschuld. Nachr. (1714.) S. 39. ap. Henke, ibid.) which confirms the statement of the experienced Cardinal Bentivoglio, (many years employed by Rome in Flan- ders and France,) that the Lutherans were more disinclined to the Reformed than to the Romanists. (Lettres de Ben- tivoglio, p. 42.) Hoe, though moderated by the necessities of the times during the conference of Leipzig, (1631), resumed his former tone when hopes of a separate Lutheran peace re- appeared, wrote against a hundred points, in which the Re- formed held erroneous, nay, Arian opinions, (Unvermeidl. Ret- tung wider das Oraculum Dodonaeum, &c. 1635), and dis- suaded from every effort to procure their religious freedom. (Henk. ib. 491.) The Reformed, as their theology remained free from formularism to a much later period than that of the Lutherans, and unbelief found consequently a much slower access among them, so were they throughout more tolerant. Public recon- ciliation was never hindered by them ; private polemics were but seldom bitter. Besides the resolution of the famous Synod of Charenton (1631), the conference of Cassel (1661) was approved of by the most distinguished theologians even of die Dutch Church; (see authorities ap. Henk. iv. 276.) and at the very time that Hoe was making the above exertions, Parcus wrote to pro-i luote the concord of the two churches, met, however, with rcfu- 58 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST tic * controversy given by Buscher in his work tations only from the Lutherans. (Henk. 3. 485; Schrockh, 40. 194.) The name of Evangelical was denied them, (Wittenb. Bedenken, ap. Henk. 4. 279.) The conference of Cassel was condemned by most Lutherans, by some as a conspiracy to be- tray the truth to apostasy and ungodliness, (Henke, ib. 277-9.) though it asserted only, that the difference of the two churches did not affect the foundation of faith nor salvation, (ib. 275.) In the same spirit they had rejected the proposals for peace from the Synod of Lissa (1645) as treacherous ; (Consil. theol.Witteb. i. 527) and in conformity to the response of the University of Wittenberg, refused, at the ensuing conference with the Roman- ists at Thorn, to unite in worship with the Reformed. (Henke, ib. 257, 8.) In Brandenburg, the so called Nominal-Elenchus, or the preaching by name against the characteristic doctrines of the Reformed, was held part of the duty of the clergy; (ib. 279.) and many of them abandoned their functions and their land sooner than comply with the moderate requisition of the wise and excel- lent Elector, Frederic William the Great, that both parties should abstain from invidious deductions from the Confessions of the other, &c. ; and that the Exorcism at Baptism should be omitted, when requested by both parents, (see ap. Henk. 280, 1.) Among these zealots one regrets to see Paul Gerhard, the author of the most beautiful and pious hymns in the German Church. To close these painful instances, in Swedish Pomerania, where were no Re- formed, an order from the local authorities, suspending declama- tions against them, and erasing from the Liturgy the petition, " Repress the Turks, Papists, and Calvinists," was annulled by application to Stockholm ; and the intermarriage of a Lutheran with a Reformed declared inadmissible, (more such cases in Bal- thasar von d. Eifer d. Pommern gegen d. Reformirten ap. Henk. ib. 283.) Some knowledge of the relation of the two churches is necessary both to understand the vehemence of the opposition to Calixtus, and as one specimen of the state of polemics in the Lutheran Church. ^ An invidious meaning was given to the term Syncretism by means of a false etymology, as if its promoters wished for a mix- CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 59 against Calixtus ; " Crypto-Papismus novae theolo- gian Helmstadiensis." (1639.) Seldom has any one been so much misunderstood, partly perhaps from his own unguardedness ^ but principally from the passions of his opponents, as this great and penetra- ting man. Incidental expressions in works, of which the substance alone ^ was his, were caught up and imputed as heresies; real positions^ perverted, and made to bear upon some existing or extinct heresy ; his anxiety to promote Christian charity converted into indifferentism. Though his office ture of religions. It implied the reverse ; for it was used, in its original sense, of union in a great common object notiuithstand- ing existing differences, having been first employed by Greek authors, of similar conduct in the " CretansJ' ^ See Weism. p. 1195. §. 3. Possessed of great talent, and taking comprehensive views, he was not aware until too late that every expression would be thus sifted. ^ This was the case with most of his works : among them the Epitome Theologiae was published, from his lectures, unrevised, and without his knowledge. In this occurred once, and once only, the expression, that " God could only be called indirectly, improperly, and per accidens the cause of sin ;" alluding to the passages in which God is said to harden men's hearts. An im- pious sense was given to the phrase, whereas it implies, that God cannot, in any proper sense, be called the author of sin, (See Weism. ib. p. 1260.) * Much occasion of offence was, for instance, taken at his allowing to the fathers of the five first centuries a secondary au- thority in fundamental articles of faith. This, which in fact in no respect differed from the practice of all Protestant writers, who have uniformly referred to the agreement of the early fathers, as witnesses of the primitive faith, was imputed to him as involv- ing the Romanist error of setting human authority co-ordinate with Scripture. (See Weism. ibid. p. 1195, 6.) GO CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST as teacher of theology was conferred upon him for his success in controversy with a Romanist \ and though by one of themselves^ he is named as their ablest antagonist, his Lutheran brethren charged him with secretly favouring them ; though he wrote against the distinguishing doctrines of the Reformed, and even represented them to be self-contradictory ^ he was accounted to belong to them; Arianism and Judaism* were imputed ' The Jesuit Aug. Turrianus had nearly effected the conversiou of a young nobleman of Brunswick, but withdrew after one day's conference with Calixtus. Calixtus was then twenty-seven. Schrbckh, 39. 690,1. ^ Bossuet Traite de la Communion sous les 2 especes, p. 1. §. 62. p. 12. Calixtus' works immediately upon this subject were, those on the Sacrifice of the Mass, on the Infallibility of the Pope, on the Marriage of the Clergy, (a treatise of considerable historical research, and the first upon the subject), and especially the Di- gressio, qua excutitur nova ars Bart. Nihusii, written upon the sophistical position then popular among French theologians, that the Catholics, by right of prescription, had no occasion to prove their doctrines, but that the Protestants, as plaintiffs, must dis- prove ihem, and that from the simple words of Scripture without inferences. This, however, was by no means the sole subject of the work, it gave occasion to lay down general principles proving the unjustified introduction of several of the distinguish- ing Romanist doctrines, &c. ^ Disput. xi. de Coena Domini, p. 247, sq. and more generally in the Annott. et Animadvr. in Confessionem Reform. Thorunii in CoUoquio A. 1645 oblatam, &c. 16.55. * These charges were brought by Weller, " Teutsche Probe." Scharff of Wittenberg imputed to him enormous errors against the Trinity, and almost Photinianism ; and so others. (Weism. ib. 1096,7.) In the same spirit Reinboth was accused of an ap- proximation to Socinianism and Atheism, for holding that the CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. Gl to him, because he thought that the doctmie of the Trinity was not revealed with equal clearness in the Old as in the New Testament; nor was, under the old dispensation, necessary to salvation. Such, however, and others, though the subjects, were not the ground of attack; they were the channels in which it flowed, the stream which filled them was his supposed indifference to the distinguishing doctrines of Lutheranism. It would now scarcely appear credible that this charge of indifferentism arose, not in any of the attempts, which have been renewed from time to time in every country, to unite different confessions ; (this Calixtus thought then impossible, or at least dis- tinctly stated, that he did not aim ^ ;) but in the endeavour to revive a mutual Christian feeling, by recalling to mind, that, however important the points of disagreement, still both Lutheran and Reformed, nay, the Romanist, held all the doctrines necessary to Salvation. Beyond this Calixtus did not go ; he shewed by his writings and by his ac- tions his value for the Lutheran doctrine ; but he did wish, that amid this diversity the ground of unity should not be forgotten ; that, amid the names of Lutheran, Reformed, and Romanist, that of Christian should not be obliterated ; nor in his very widest assertion, that all doctrines necessary doctrine of the Procession of the Holy Spirit from the Son was. not a necessary article, nor prescribed in the ancient Creeds. Henk. iv. 264. ' See Schrockh, 704, sq. VVeism. ib. 1203. sq. 62 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST to salvation are contained in the Apostles' Creed, (however in shallower minds such a maxim may at different times have been a cloak for indiffer- entism) was there any undervaluing of the main Christian doctrines ; since it was evidently not a mere abstract belief in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but that of the doctrines therein involved, which he understood. This meaning he has him- self sufficiently explained \ The conference at Thorn, between the two Protestant bodies and the Romanist Church, where his presence as co- adjutor of the Reformed delegates, at the request of the Elector of Brandenburg, gave ground to lasting offence, had in view only the same general object, that a better acquaintance with each other's principles might diminish the bitterness of discord ^ Half the evils of controversy would indeed cease, did the mass of each party derive their knowledge of the tenets of their opponents from any other source than the refutations on their own side. Calixtus promised the same as- sistance to some of the Lutheran delegates, but ' Calixtus' meaning is clear from other passages, where he ex- presses the same sentiment in different language, as, that all a Christian need believe in order to salvation was contained in the ancient creeds and decisions of the councils ; that whoever agreed with these doctrines of the ancient Church, he was in heart united with him, &c. (Digress, de arte nova, p. 462, sq. ap. Schrockh, 39. 697.) See especially the principles developed in the De To- lerantia Reformator. * The points of controversy were in this conference neither to be attacked nor defended, but to be explained; the word " dis- CHARACTER OP THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 63 was, by means of others, rejected ^ In this Chris- tian career he was acting on the principles and according to the oath of the professors of his Uni- versity to promote Christian peace ^, and, from his personal knowledge of the character of the different confessions in various countries ^ his mind became alive to the existence of the same great doctrines in all, to which his contemporaries had been deadened by exclusive attention to points of controversy. The endless struggles in pute" was not to be used ; it was to be a fraterna collatio, a colloquium charitativum. It had also the result, that the Re- formed Church, especially that of Brandenburg, did here form the Confession, called, from the conference, that of Thorn. (Schrockh, 39. 509—12. Henk. iv. 256-9.) After this confer- ence many of the orthodox party ceased to regard Calixtus as an evangelical teacher. (Schrockh 39. 702, fg.) ^ Schrockh, 39. 703. ^ Mosh. c. 17. ii. 2. § 21. Weismann says that Helmstadt had always exerted a greater freedom of opinion than other Univer- sities, which accordingly denied to its theologians the character of pure and genuine Lutherans, contrary to their own protesta^ tions. The non-reception of the Formula of Concord seems in part to have contributed to this difference ; the doctrine of the ubiquity of Christ's body, whose rejection appeared to the Luthe- rans of that formula to involve an approximation to the Re- formed doctrine, was not only not admitted, but expressly set aside by Luther in one of his later works, (quoted by Cahxtus de Tolerantia Reformator. ap. Schrockh. 39. 497.) ^ He studied the practical character of the reformed confession in Holland, in England, (where he derived much benefit from Casaubon, and his attention was directed to the study of the fa- thers by the English bishops), and in France. At Colin, where practical Romanism was most fully exhibited, he employed six months. (See his life in Schrockh, 39. 689-91.) 6 64 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST which Calixtus became involved, prevented his giving a better direction to theological study by the complete digestion of his own comprehensive views, and limited his immediate influence nearly to the countries where the Formula of Concord had not been introduced ^ ; yet many of his opi- nions produced enquiry^; historical investiga- ^ Such as Holstein, Brunswick, and part of Hesse Nurnberg, The whole University of Helmstadt coincided with CaUxtus ; among whose members Conring, the most distinguished and most variously cultivated of the learned of his country, (Schrockh, ib. 707) through his influence with different princes, by whom he was constantly consulted, was enabled to remove many of the imputations circulated against him. The duchess Anna Sophia procured admission for theologians of his school into Branden- burg, (see authorities ap. Henke, iv. 271-3.) In Saxony, on the contrary, among other places, no one who had studied at Helm- stadt was preferred, without abjuring the so-called Calixtian principles. (Answer oi Fred. Will, of Brand, ap. Henk. ib. 280.) Among other attempts of a similar character, most worthy of no- tice is that of Calov, who endeavoured, by means of a new symbo- lical book, to exclude the Calixtians from the Lutheran Church and the rehgious peace. (See Weism. ib. 1205-6. Henke, iv. 268.) Even in Kbnigsberg, where they were protected by the Elector of Brandenburg, all the influence of his disciples was destroyed by the vehement opposition of Mislenta, popular tumult excited, and even an honourable burial refused to M. Behm, who would not unite in decrying them. (Hartknoch Preuss. Kirchenh. S. 609. ff. and others ap. Weism. ib. 1205. Henk. iv. 268-9.) * His view, for instance, on the Revelation of the doctrine of the Trinity in the Old Testament, and on the supposed necessity of its being believed under the former dispensation, led naturally to in- quiry into the now almost obliterated distinction of the two cove- nants, and into the gradual character of revelation ; the limitation which he introduced into the doctrine of inspiration, confining it CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 65 tion ' and a sounder scriptural interpretation commenced, through his example, instruction, or principles ; his fragment on the study of theology contained and illustrated his valuable and large views on the nature of the necessary preliminary ^ acquirements, as well as on the compass and order of the different branches of the science itself; and in the separation of essentials from non-essentials, his warnings against needless controversy, and his opposition to a dead faith ^ he directly pre- to the essentials of religion, and admitting the existence of minor errors of transcription, must tend to a simplification of the exist- ing theory ; his exclusion of the doctrines of universal religion from the sum of Christian truths, would naturally lead to more defined ideas on Revelation, &c. &c. (See Schrockh, ib. 706.) ^ To this Calixtus contributed theoretically by the sketch in the Apparatus Theologicus (in which there occurs an expression, very remarkable for those times, that " without the knowledge of ecclesiastical history, no theologian deserves the name," see the Epitome of the Fragment, in Schrockh, ib. 400-2.) and practi- cally, by his own example in his different controversial works, which communicated itself to his scholars and disciples. (See Henke, ib. 255.) This historical character of the school, as far as its influence extended, weakened the dominion of formularism. 2 His own Commentaries were indeed very imperfectly pub- lished, yet his Apparatus Theolog. shews at large the combined service of philology and philosophy in biblical interpretation ; and Hackspan, one of the best commentators of the age, was his disciple. ' To this place belongs the controversy " whether good works were necessary to salvation," for maintaining which his colleague Horneius was termed Papist, Majorist, Anabaptist, and severely condemned by Wittenberg, Jena, and Leipzig. Calixtus, to avoid ambiguity or offence, employed other terms ; yet because he urged as a motive to chastity, (in his Historia Josephi) that F 6G CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST pared the way for the exertions of Spener. Re- markable is it also, in proof of the ill effects of the existing controversies, that the persons, who in this century most promoted the advance of theo- logical science, were either pupils of Calixtus, or of the same uncontentious disposition \ The present controversy was estimated by men of high talent ^ entirely unconnected with party ; salvation might be endangered by the contrary sins, this exhorta- tion was converted into the position that chastity, (and thus good works,) were necessary to salvation, and the same imaginary heresies supposed to be involved. (Weism. ib. 1198, 9.) * Among the former may be mentioned the celebrated Hack- span, Durr, (the first expander of the science of Christian moral) and the elder Fabricius ; among the latter John Gerhard, (whom Bossuet calls " le troisieme homme de la Reformation apr^s Luther and Chemnice," Hist, des Var. T. 2, p, 455.) and to whom Du Pin preferred Melanchthon alone, (Biblioth. des. Auteurs separes de la Coram, de I'Eglise Rom. T. ii. p. 74, sqq.) but who was frivolously depreciated by many Lutheran contem- poraries, (Schrockh, ib. 443. ; Budd. Isag. i. p. 353, sq.; Weism. ib. 1127.) Tarnov, Glassius, M. Geier, Sagittarius, Kortholt, S. Schmidt, Reuchlin ; of the same spirit were the few, who presented striking exceptions to the decayed and lifeless system of preaching, — Arndt, J. V. Andrea, Herberger, — and of the learned theologians, J. Gerhard and Glassius. (See Schrockh, ib. 464 — 9 ; on J. V. Andrea there is a very interesting Memoir in Weism. ib. 1131—8.) "^ These were the celebrated Glassius and Musaeus. The opinion, which the former was commissioned by Ernest the Pious of Saxe Gotha to deliver on the points of controversy, was pub- lished after his death ; and is " almost the only work (says Schrockh, 43. 250.) which furnishes a correct and moderate estimate of the controversy." Musseus, first in his lectures, esti- mated candidly the meaning of the expressions upon which the charges against the Calixtians were founded, (Weism. p. 1206.) CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 67 these virtually acquitted Calixtus ; the only effect, however, of their candour was, to divert the con- test in part against themselves ; it was continued against the younger Calixtus, who possessed nei- ther the talents, the learning, nor the temper of his father, and had degenerated into mere mutual revilings, before it sunk in the deeper interest of that with Spener and his followers. Spener's endowments, (though he was possessed of considerable learning ^) were rather of a moral and religious, than of a high intellectual nature. and was consequently charged by a disciple of Calov with 93 errors in the most essential doctrines ; (Schrockh, ib. 251.) as those of Calixtus had varied from 80 to 120. (Schrockh, 39. 706.) These he refuted point by point, satisfactorily shewing their vexa- tiousness, and the danger which resulted to the Church from this wanton multiplication of controversy. (Weism. p. 1207.) Calov after Calixtus' death, refused to use the term " beatus C," alleging that he must on the same ground speak of B. Bellar- mine, B. Calvinus, B. Socinus, &c. (Weism. p. 1148.) and at Wittenberg, in a dramatic piece, Calixtus was represented as a fiend with horns and claws, (quoted by Henk. iv. 271.) ^ Early intended for the pastoral office, he studied principally at Strasburg and Basle under Seb. Schmidt, (the best Scripture expositor of his time, and whose works are even now useful) Dennhauer and Buxtorf, Hebrew and other Oriental languages, history, and especially the interpretation of Scripture. His inti- mate study of Grotius' treatise De Bello et Pace, his being the author of the first considerable treatise on heraldry, (of which two editions were published,) and his delivery of lectures and holding disputations at Strasburg and Basle on geography and history, logic, and metaphysics, are indications of a more extensive know- ledge not confined merely to actual theology, (see Schrockh, B. 43, S. 256. Canstein Leben Speners, §. 4, 5.) Still his best powers were given to theology, and much more to religion. F 2 68 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST Even his sermons owed their attractions solely to their pure biblical and practical character. Those among his qualifications which approached most nearly to gifts of nature, a sound judgment^, and a practical intuitive insight into the point upon which each question turned, were in him moral qualities. Through these endowments principally, combined with his own religious experience and his study of the history of the Church, he was enabled to see precisely what were the defects in its then state ; his piety and religious zeal, sup- plied without pretension, in the regular perform- ance of his functions, an example of the remedy for those defects. On these two points, then, turns the extensive, though from external cir- cumstances still inadequate, reformation, which he was enabled to effect. He did not claim for himself the character of a reformer, and was perhaps on that very account, in those turbulent and intolerant times, the more calculated to be one. Too fully penetrated with the importance of the truths, whose neglect he deplored, in the slightest degree to compromise them for an un- sound peace, yet was his manner of stating them conciliating and mild ; confiding in the power of those truths, when stated, to make themselves acknowledged and felt, he withheld as much as possible his own individuality from mingling with them ; he lived, as long as his opponents permitted him, for the discharge of his own duties alone, ' Leben Sp. S. 38, 9. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 69 trusting that either the fruits of their right dis- charge might kindle others to like exertions, or that God would raise up others, who might carry into effect upon a more extensive scale that reform, whose necessity he proclaimed, but in which he himself was content to act a subordinate part. The alarm and jealousy were thus avoided, which might have resulted from bolder and more direct attempts. The princes of Germany valued and favoured him '. Enemies he had, from envy, from the unpalatableness of the truths which he promulgated, from his undervaluing the mere intellectual orthodoxism of his day, from his discovering that among the many things, on the laborious acquisition of which the orthodox theo- logians prided themselves, the one thing needful had been forgotten ; but no one became Spener's enemy from any presumption or failing of his own. The following extract from a private letter^ to a friend gives much insight into the Christian ' Witness his first unsolicited invitation to Dresden as first court preacher; and that subsequently to Berlin, when the displea- sure of the Elector of Saxony at the earnestness of his preaching had emboldened his antagonists, and made his office painful; the confidence of the Elector of Brandenburg in entrusting to him all the theological appointments of the newly-erected University at Halle, (Schrockh, ib. 271.) and the invitation to resume his office at Dresden, (1698), at the very time that the divines of Saxony were declaiming against his deviations from the doctrines and constitution of the Evangelical Church. (Ibid. p. 282.) * Published at Halle three years after his death, in the collec- tion of his occasional writings and letters, entitled Thcologische Bedenken, 32 Th. S. 305. (1708). This and the following ex- tract are quoted by Schrockh, B. 43, S. 264. 70 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST mildness and humility of Spener's character, as well as into the principles upon which he acted. " To set myself up as a reformer of the Church were a folly, which I do not allow myself to entertain ; I know sufficiently my own weakness, that I have received neither the wisdom nor strength for such a task. Let me then be con- tented to be numbered among the voices which encourage those to work a reformation, whom the Lord may have endowed with the ability thereto. For such a work then I need no followers, nor to draw others to me. Yet neither am I required to break with those Theologians, of whom I may either myself think and hope well, or who at least do not openly oppose the truth. Rather is it my aim to retain their good feelings in any way which is not contrary to my conscience ; whether that their coinciding with me may make my own work succeed better, or that they may be thereby encouraged to a more diligent discharge of their office, or that they may not be seduced wickedly to oppose the Christian intentions of others. All which ends are in conformity with the glory of God. On the other hand I see not how it could be justifiable, wantonly to drive such needlessly to oppose themselves." Nor was this feeling of his own insufficiency momentary; it is expressed yet more fully, and therefore with more evident humility, in a letter to another friend, (1678) \ " I know well not only that the work of Reforniation is not the v\^ork of one man, ^ Schrockh, ib, S. 226. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 71 but that, whatever may be the purpose of the Lord towards his Church, I shall neither be the chief agent, nor one of the chief; since lie has not bestowed upon me the talents thereto. More honour already than I deserve is it that my God has so far blessed my " pia desideria," that they have sounded sufficiently loud to awaken and encourage many, — not to learn of me, but to reflect further on the subject according to the powers which they have from God." Of his in- adequacy, which he here mentions in general terms, he assigns the grounds in another letter. " I find in myself a want of erudition and of natural qua- lifications, deficiencies which I observe in the execution of my functions, so that I am ashamed of being so little able to help myself. How then would it be, were I to undertake a thing so great? Especially am I deficient in the power of the Spirit from above, which is, alas! very weak; and my natural timidity even in small matters is difficult to overcome; nor can I do any thing which requires a truly heroic courage, but if the Lord of our Church design yet more to bless it, so that besides possessing true doctrine it should be brought generally into a sound condition, the agents must be very different from me and such as me." The agency of Spener, then, principally arose from the influence of his example, in the restoration of a more instructive and influential mode of preaching and of catechizing, and in the institution of those Unions for the promotion of piety and of Christian knowledge, which received the title of Collegia Pietatis ; from his writings. 72 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST and from the communication of the same spirit to others, especially to the Theologians of Halle. The previous state of the pulpit has been already described. The evil was too universal to be felt. There was not light sufficient to make the darkness visible. Spener's reform commenced in the omission of the superfluous parade of dry learning, of unpractical controversy, of self-dis- play, and of the cramped mechanism of the Arrangements. His preaching was a simple but energetic developement and application of the Gospel. It is indeed no slight proof of the dominion of controversy in preaching, that in one of his earliest sermons, (1667) ' on the neces- sary precautions against false prophets,' even he gave offence by including the Reformed among them \ The error was not repeated. Nor is the sensation excited by one, shortly subsequent, " on the false and insufficient righteousness of the Pharisees," in which he developed the incorrect ideas of many Christians on virtue and holiness, as if these consisted in the mere avoiding of gross vices, less a proof of the necessities of his times. Many there lirst learnt the insufficiency of unfruitful faith without amendment of the heart ; some, unwilling to have their imagined security disturbed, refused again to enter his church^. Spener indeed did not cultivate one portion alone of the Christian system ; he did not dwell exclusively on favourite doctrines, but * Schrbckli, ib. 262. Spener retained his regrets for this action even in his lust siekuess. (Lcben S. 138.) ^ JSchiockh, 1. c. CHARACTER OF GERMAN THEOLOGY. 73 proposed the whole of Christianity. His three years' courses of sermons ' contain severally. Gos- pel doctrine, Gospel duty, the consolations of Gospel faith. In the second especially, he taught not merely, as inexperienced moral teachers, that the duties were to be performed, but how ; what facilitated, advanced, or hindered them^. Spe- ner's anxiety to render belief practical is further evinced by his venturing to omit assertions, which were abused by fleshly mindedness and indolence, but to the letter of which an indiscriminating Orthodoxy clung ; such as that " No one can at- tain to the perfection which the divine law re- quires :" " in the act of justification, on the part of man, faith alone is concerned without good works," and by the revival of the often contested doctrine, that " good works are necessary to sal- vation*'." It was, namely, one of Spener's main objects to remove the confidence in the dead faith, which the series of controversies had fostered \ The publication of these sermons, aided by Spe- ner's living example, formed a new era in Chris- tian preaching ; the causes of the unfruitfulness of the former method became thus manifest : the * They were published while Spener was at Dresden, 1688. * Schuler. 1. c. S. 22. %. Allgemeine Biographic, Th. 6, S.319. fg. 417, fg. ap. Schrbckh, B. 43. S. 163. ' Mosheim, C. 17, P. 2, S. 2. c. 1. § 31. Not however that Spener held that justificatfbn was other than the free gift of God, but that good works as the fruits of faith were contained in it. * See Loscher, one of Spener's bitterest antagonists, as quoted by Schrockh, B. 43, S. 289. 74 CAUSES OP THE LATE RATIONALIST widest sphere however was opened to the pure biblical instruction of Spener, when theoretically as well as practically inculcated and exemplified by the first theologians of Halle, who united the offices of Professors and of Christian Ministers. The defects of the catechetical system have been already noticed. Spener aimed at, and suc- ceeded in, restoring the sense of its importance, which had been felt by every class even of the earliest Reformers \ and had been earnestly in- culcated by Luther, and in giving it a more in- structive and practical character. The first he effected by undertaking its duties himself, when his high station in the Church did not make it a part of his office ; (both as Senior of the Evange- lical Ministerium at Frankfort, and as first court- preacher and member of the Upper Consistory at Dresden, whence in the latter office he could more effectually further it in others.) In both places he infused so much interest into his in- structions, that even grown persons gladly availed themselves of them^. To the improvement of * It is interesting and singular to see the practice independently revived by the Vaudois, by WickhfFe, and by Huss, after it had been nearly obUterated since the sixth century : (Budd. ib. 334, sqq.) and the circumstance adds to the proof, that Protestantism had its rise in the rehgious wants of Christians, not in intellectual difficulties, or in the much-praised scientific advancement of the age. Science aided indeed the Reformation, but was not its source; it can, and has as much perhaps assisted Romanism. Erasmus was more learned than any of the Reformers, yet was not himself one. 2 Schr5ckh, ib. 151, fgg. CHARACTER OF GERMAN THEOLOGY. 75 the mode of catechising he contributed princi- pally by his " simple explanation of Christian doctrine according to the order of [[Luther's^ lesser catechism;" (1677.) a full and clear expo- sition of the sum of Christian faith, in reference to Christian life, with well-selected scriptural proofs \ His object in this work was to give a specimen how unpractised Christians might be taught, not by a mere mechanical exertion of the memory, but by developing their newly-acquired knowledge in their own language. He warned consequently against any mere adoption of his own model ; he added tables, explanatory of his method, the more clearly to shew how little a mere adoption, or servile imitation, was neces- sary". The science of catechetical instruction, which has since been expanded, owes its existence to this work of Spener's. Immediately connected with this improvement of elementary instruction was his revival of the rite of confirmation, whose solemnity and influence in the German Church now far exceeds that generally observable in our own ; but which, until Spener, had sunk into neglect, as a supposed remnant of Popery ^ Spener's widest influence, however, was derived from the institution of the much-questioned " col- legia pietatis." The object of these at their first commencement, was to expand, explain, and ap- ply the discourse of the preceding Sunday. He * See Budd. ib. 336. ' Schrockh, ib. " Henke, iv. 519. 76 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST had felt, in common probably with every prac- tical minister, the inadequacy of any instruction, in which the people were mere recipients, either in imparting religious knowledge, or in giving an individual effect to what was delivered generally. In these meetings, which were commenced with prayer, part of the sermon was repeated, ques- tions were asked by Spener to ascertain how far it had been understood, or proposed to him by any of the men present, not to satisfy curiosity, but to promote practical piety. These meetings continued to be conducted upon the same prin- ciples, when a passage of Scripture was laid as the basis instead of the sermon \ The free commu- nication and the knowledge of the wants of the congregation re-acted upon the usefulness of the pulpit. These meetings were approved of by his colleagues, were in conformity with the symboli- cal books, praised by the Universities, and consult- ed even by Ben. Carpzov, who was subsequently, from envy, the great enemy ' of Spener. In the Articles of Smalcald (III Th. Art. 4.) it is said, • Schrockh, ib. S. 257. ^ Carpzov's subsequent enmity arose in the disappointment of his expectation that the office at Dresden, which was given to Spener, should have been filled by himself or his brother. (Leben Sp. S. 118.) His brother actually was the successor of Spener. (Vater, 368.) This inconsistency, which Calovius shared with most of Spener's opponents, was excused by the idle distinction of a ' Spener prior et posterior,' though Spener continued to act uni- formly to the end, and all his plans of reformation had been already developed. (Niemeyer die Universitat Halle nach Ihrem Einfluss auf gelehrte u. prakt. Theol. S. 32.) CHARACTER OF GERMAN THEOLOGY. 77 " Brotherly conferences out of the word of God, among the people, are a valuable aid to Christian advancement :" and B. Carpzov declared, with reference to these times, " The advantages of these meetings cannot be told, especially when the hearers thus communicate with their teach- ers ; for unquestionably a common man learns more from one such meeting, than from ten ser- mons '." The example thus given speedily spread ; similar meetings were instituted in other places, as Essen, Augsburg, Schweinfurt, Giessen, &c. ; and though, in the place of their original institu- tion, misrepresentation diminished their influ- ence ^ in others they may have been inconsider- ' In his " Auserlesene Tugendspruche." Another passage is adduced by Lange Antibarb. T. 1 1. p. 171. " This wish of those enlightened and celebrated theologians, Dannhauer and Dors- cheus, a zealous divine, (whom may God long continue to his Church) has not only very earnestly urged in his Pia Desi- deria, but has even shewn how Collegia Pietatis may be formed where there are no Universities, and laymen be admitted to speak in them. Whether they do well who despise them, and thwart them to the utmost of their power, when they might much promote them, time will shew." A similar opinion of Sagittarius is quoted by Weism. 1230, and others are mentioned generally. ' Schrockh 1. c. mentions generally, that these meetings were removed twelve years afterwards, at the requisition of some am- bassadors, into the Church, where the hearers having no longer the liberty of speaking, much of their usefulness of course fell away. In some places they were introduced without the superintendance of the minister, were naturally attended with irregularities, and suppressed under the name of conventicles. But these abuses were no necessary consequence of the institution, and Spener amply defended himself in a separate work, 1677, and in his 78 CAUSES OF TIIL' LATE RATIONALIST ately introduced, and were forbidden, yet they continued long a blessing to the Church, and were the means of recalling many, even of the learned, from the inventions and disputes of the schools, to the basis of a more fruitful theology, in piety and the study of the Scriptures \ On these were also founded the Collegia Biblica, which formed part of the widely-felt utility of the University of Halle. Of Spener's writings many have already been occasionally mentioned. The most extensively useful were, perhaps, the Pia Desideria, and the works in vindication or explanation of it ". It is no slight proof of the mildness of Spener's cha- racter, that a production containing such bold, " Allgemeine Gottesgelahrtheit," (Walch Einl. in d. Rellgions- Streitigk. 1 Th. S. 560, fg.) nor was he directly attacked on this head until after his death (by Loscher, Timotheus Verinus, 2 Th. S. 112. fg.) * Twesten, p. 163. The University of Giessen, which in the later contests with the Pietists adopted the milder side against that of Rostock, seems to have long felt the influence of this ear- lier institution. Henke, Th. 8. S, 37. ^ Buddeus bestows however great praise not only upon the wri- tings mentioned, but upon his expositions of Scripture, especially one ' libellum plane aureum,' in which Spener collected and ex- plained the passages of Scripture abused by worldly men to encou- rage a false security, (Isag. p. 1479.) and his " de natura et gratia," (on the difference of actions derived from man's natural powers, and those proceeding from the influence of the Holy Spirit,) " in Avhich he was the first who abandoned the intricate, and often useless, questions of the schools, and made the enquiry through- out practical." (lb. 592.) Lange says that even for the quicken- ing of the natural intellect, there could be no better whetstone than Spener's writings. Anmm. zu. Sp. Leb. S. 38. CHARACTER OF GERMAN THEOLOGY. 79 unwelcome, and sweeping truths, could have been so written, as to give so little offence, and to call forth at first universal approbation \ Spener re- ceived innumerable letters of thanks for this work ; and not only the celebrated Kortholt, but even B. Carpzov, praised him for it. Yet Spener's censures extended to every branch of the Lu- theran Church ; he complained, that of the magis- tracy few knew what Christianity was ; that, at the most, they only provided for the maintenance of the hereditary system ; and that many hindered the good which religion might produce. That the order of the clergy required a thorough re- form; that many lived in profligacy ; many taught the letter only of Scripture; that numbers were such strangers to real earnest piety, that one zealous for it was looked upon as a Papist, Qua- ker, and Fanatic ; that an immoderate value was attached to mere forms ; that the clergy were looked upon as a caste of priests, like those of Rome, and wished to become so ; that many deemed a mere peace from external enemies the most blessed condition of the Church, and there- fore studied alone the means of subduing them, controversy. He dwelt also on the vices of the laity ". His proposed cure was extensive ; his ' Henke, 3. 516. The testimonies of many of the most dis- tinguished theologians were adduced by Spener himself, in a sub- sequent defence of Pietism, Griindl. Beantwortung des Unfugs der Pietisten, c. 1. § 15. fgg. ^ Undoubtedly the whole of this lamentable state of the Church is not to be attributed to the contentious and unpractical theo- 6 80 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST views relating to the education of the clergy have been already named ; on religious controversy especially, he timely warns, that right disputing about religion, even if free from irritation, is not sufficient, but must be accompanied with the ap- parent desire of improving the opponent, and of teaching him the wholesome application of the truth maintained '. Yet of all the positions in this work, two" alone, and these incidentally only logy. The fearful excesses and the extremes of misery of the thirty years' war had demoralized and degraded Germany : still the state of religious teaching and religious education prevented the application of the remedy, which a better religious instruction might have afforded. No slight degree of misery fell upon Ger- many in the last desolating war; yet was the greater earnestness of mind, which this created, among the principal means of reviving religion ; but unbelief is, for the most part, more reclaimable than a dead and contented orthodoxism. ^ See the extract in Schrbckh, ib. S. 289, fgg. ' These were, the one, Spener's favourite maxim, that " the theology of an unregenerate person was no real theology," but only a philosophising about divine things ; which had been main- tained, unquestioned, by his instructor, Dannhauer, and by many others. " Pietistica posthac sententia vocata est, et periculosus error," says Weismann, " quod mille forsan Theologi nostrates, tanquam gravem et arduam veritatem docuerunt," (Hist. Eccles. p. 1214, sq. where some authorities are quoted.) It was first op- posed by Dielefield, a deacon in Nordhausen, 1679, and subse- quently by the opposite assertion of Lbscher, " that the ministry of an unconverted teacher was just as beneficial as if he were converted ;" in support of which he appealed to the so-called gratia ministerialis, by which God was supposed uniformly to bless not only the administration of the Sacraments, " though administered by evil men," but their teaching also. With regard to the latter, Lange might well term this gratia ministerialis an CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 81 connected with its import, were at the time at- tacked, and the theologians of Saxony continued to praise his orthodoxy, until the displeasure of the Elector of Saxony, at his earnest, but strictly official \ remonstrances, made opposition accept- absurd and pernicious fiction. (See Spener Allg. Gottesgel. Fr. 1,2. Loscher Tiraoth. Verimus, 1 Th. S. 281. fg. Pacho- mii Synops. Logom. Pietist, c. 1. qu. b. p. 5. ap. Schrockh, ib. p. 287, 8.) Yet Spener's maxim in other words, that no real theology can be conceived without piety and religious interest, no one would now think of questioning. Then, however, it was found to contain Pelagianism, Arminianism, Calvinism, Soci- nianism, &c. (see ap. Weism. ibid.) The other point related to the anticipation of better times, when Romanism having sunk, and the Jews having been converted, Christianity should attain a fuller and more glorious development ; these cheering expecta- tions Spener distinctly separated from the millenniary dreams of apocalyptic writers ; he expected no earthly, no distinct kingdom, no kingdom of glory, which should replace the kingdom of grace ; none, which should endure a precise period of ten centuries ; but according to the analogy of the history of religion, and of Chris- tianity itself, he did anticipate, that after the long contest which it has carried on, and in which it has been gaining successive victories, its conquest should be yet more manifest, that accord- ing to the prophets, a time should come " when the knowledge of the Lord should cover the earth, as the waters cover the sea." (See Spener's Behauptung der Hoffhung besserer Zeiten, 1693 ; his Vindication, 97 ; his Letzte Theologische Bedenken, 3 Th. S. 73; Loscher's Timoth. Ver. 1. Th. c. 1. and others ap. Schrockh, ib. S. 291, 2. Spener's Leben, S. 137.) Yet among a large portion of Spener's opponents, these hopes were deemed no better than the grossest conceptions of Chiliastic fanatics, were thought to overthrow the foundations of the faith, and the whole sum of Christian doctrine; to lead to seditions and tumults, &c. &c. (Weism, 1225.) ^ Spener was his Confessor. Weism. p. 1168, says, Summara G 82 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST able. From that date much of Spener's time was consumed in self-defence. Not only B. Carpzov then wrote against him, but the University of Wittenberg maintained its character by setting forth two hundred and sixty-four errors which were to be found in his writings ; twenty-five of these relate to the symbolical books ^ ; of the rest prudentiam, modestiam, gradationemque scrupulosissiraam in sacro suo officio in Aula gerendo observavit B. Spenerus, at ne sic quidem causam, non suam, sed Dei, perficere potuit. ' The allegations against Spener with regard to the symbolical books, as far as they were allegations, have been justly reckoned by Zeltner among the Anti-pietistic Logomachies, (under the name of Pachomius, Synopsis Logomach. ut vulgo vocant Pietisti- carum, a. 59. 72, fg.) Spener acknowledged that these books con- tained divine truths, he believed them free from errors in doc- trine, yet he justly thought that confusion and symbololatry alone could arise from terming them " inspired," (as comprising doc- trine originally given by inspiration) which his opponents required of him. (Weism. ib. 1226, fg. Budd. ib. 474, fg. Schrockh, ib. 191, fgg.) In the much agitated question of the use of the quia or the quatenus in the subscription of the symbolical books, which Spener did not originate, but which he was called upon to decide, he wished only that those, who for conscience sake de- clined the apparently stricter formula, might be allowed to employ the " quatenus;" yet he himself always used the former. Indeed the two formulae mutually imply each other ; no conscien- tious man could subscribe to articles, " so far as they agreed with Holy Scripture," who did not believe that in their princi- ples, that in all essentials, they did so agree ; nor can it be thought that every individual, who subscribes them *' because they so agree," necessarily binds liimself to every incidental ex- pression, so that he agree in the principle. As to the value of the symbolical books, Spener said, that " none held them in greater respect, treated and inculcated them on their hearers with greater diligence than those who were reproached as Pietists, and CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 83 many illustrate the character of the orthodoxisni of that period ; it was deemed erroneous then, that he considered a holy life as absolutely neces- sary, since without it no one could have a true faith ; that the truth and sincerity of the repent- ance was indispensable to the validity of abso- lution ; that in all absolution a condition was implied ; that the intention to reform was a pre- paration for repentance ; that all revenge was forbidden ; that the Scripture was no power of God, so long as it was neither read nor heard ; that the Greek of the New Testament was, in different books, more or less elegant, the Holy Spirit having conformed himself to the style of each writer ^ ; that Holy Scripture was then only a source of religious knowledge, when it was understood according to the mean- ing of the Holy Spirit ; that ministers were mere guides to the real teacher, the Holy Spi- that the whole question was not about the real vaUie, use, esti- mation, or authority of the symboHcal books, but about their abuse by certain Theologians to charge heresy upon unmeriting and orthodox men." (ap. Weism. 1227.) Neither did his fol- lowers diminish the respect attached to them. (Schrockh, ib. 193.) The neglect of the symbolical books was the effect, not the cause of change in doctrine. ^ This extraordinary hypothesis, which, in a manner read- mitted human individuality in the composition of the Scripture, at the same time that it denied it, became predominant, when the difference of style and of the purity of the language in the different books had been put beyond question by the progress of criticism ; in Spener's time the admission itself was thought to derogate from inspiration, G 2 84 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST lit, and Christ in him; that believers are, in matters of belief, free from all human authority ; that heretics, out of that Church, might possess faith, real love, the Holy Spirit, and eternal hap- piness ; that much might be learnt and imitated from the Reformed, the Romanists, the Anabap- tists, Quakers, and other parties ; that the new man was not less nourished by the bread and wine in the Lord's Supper, than the natural man by the natural bread and wine, &c. &c \ Yet notwithstanding the vindications of him- self thus extorted, in which, however, Spener still manifested the same practical and conciliat- ing spirit, his indefatigable industry enabled him to maintain an almost incredibly large correspon- dence on all the subjects which mainly occupied his long life, manifesting a very deep acquaint- ance with the necessities of the Church, and a sound judgment on the means of meeting them. Through these he exerted no merely temporary influence over a large portion of the German * The title is curious: " Clirist-Luthrische Vorstellung in deutlichen aufrichtigen Lehrsatzen, nach Gottes Wort und d. Symbol. Kirchenbiichern, sonderlich d. Augsb. Conf., und unrich- tigen Gegensatzen aus Hrn Spener's Schriften, zur Ehre des grossen Gottes, Erhaltungder GottlichenWahrheit, auchBeylage der Augsb. Conf. xi. d. and. symbol. Biicher, geistlichen A-^erein- barung d. aufrichtigen Theologen, treuer Warnung der recht- glaubigen Lutheraner, u. s. w. aufgesetzt u. publioirt von den Theologis in Wittenberg." Well might a theologian of those days say with a sigh, " in more nunc positum esse apud multos, ut lubentius centum htereticos, quani unum faciant Christianum." (ap. Weism. 1215.) CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 85 Church. Four quarto volumes were published in his life, besides those which were subsequently- collected \ At Berlin, also, as well at Dresden, he maintained in his own family and formed many, who continued to act after his death in the same principles. Spener, then, both by his direct improvements, by his revival of Biblical enquiry and historical investigation, by his concessions that other com- munions might in some respects be more correct than the Lutheran, by his disapprobation of some rites in his own Church '^ by the admission that though it was clear from fundamental errors, it, as little as any other Church, could be free from ' The principal subjects of this collection were, the best me- thod of Theological learning ; Christian doctrine and moral, especially the promotion of piety ; the explanation of Biblical passages ; cases of difficulty in the Christian ministry ; the ne- cessary improvements in the Church, and the safest mode of their execution ; Ecclesiastical law ; the general and particular state of the Church ; Christian principles of conduct towards Christians of a different persuasion ; judgments on a great num- ber of remarkable men and their opinions ; " a treasure of prac- tical observations, and admonitions, for Theologians, Ministers, and Christians, of many ranks." (Allgem. Biogr. 6*"=' Th. S. 444, fg. ap. Schr. ib. S. 130.) ^ Of Confession, for example, as it then existed, (Letzte Theol. Bedenken, 3 Th. S. 723.) he says that " almost all conscien- tious preachers looked upon it as a burthen, and that he himself was glad from his heart that he had now nothing to do with it." Exorcism at Baptism he termed an useless ceremony, which might easily prove cause of offence, and might well be abolished. (Theol, Bed. 1 Th. S. 157, fg.) 86 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST air, and by the spirit of enquiry to which these principles gave rise, shook, incidentally, the sup- posed infallibility and perfection, which was vir- tually ascribed to the old system, and upon which its security rested. His immediate followers carried on practically the improvements whose theory he had given, and through the erection of the University of Halle obtained an extensive and influential field of action. The bitter polemics of the Lutherans of Wit- tenberg '^, (whither the Prussian students, and es- pecially those of the Mark, had for the most part been wont to repair) suggested to the Elector of Brandenburg, who wished for concord, the erec- tion of an University, nearer, and more peaceful. Halle was already a place of education, and was adopted at the recommendation of Thomasius, who had withdrawn thither, having been removed from Leipzig by the persecutions of the ortho- dox Theologians ^ The three who at first com- posed the Theological faculty there, Francke, Anton, and Breithaupt, had all more or less, de- rived their spirit from Spener ; Anton and Breit- ' Theol. Bed. 3 Th. S. 706, fg-. ' Above thirty years before, Fred. Will, the Great had been obliged, on the same grounds, to refuse to prefer any Theologi- cal students educated at Wittenberg. (Henke, iv. 279.) ^ These were excited by his defence of Francke, and his justi- fication of intermarriage between the Lutheran and the Reformed, in the course of which he gave offence to Casp. Loscher of Wit- tenberg-, who procured his removal, (Henke, iv. 542, fg.) CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 87 haiipt had been formed by him at Frankfort ; the zeal of Francke for the promotion of piety had been furthered, and its character determined, by a two month's residence with him at Dresden. Immedi- ately upon his return, he, as a subsidiary teacher (privatim docens) at Leipzig, as well as Anton, had held Biblical lectures, and presided at the meet- ings of the students for the study of Scripture '. These were continued for some months unno- ticed ; the numbers mounted to some hundreds ; many of the hearers became distinguished for the exemplariness of their life ; and though some may not have been free from peculiarities, an in- vestigation instituted in consequence of calumny, fully acquitted them of misconduct ^ The Uni- versity reported the blamelessness of the lec- tures, yet Francke was suspended, though Thoma- sius, and Sagittarius, entirely unconnected with him, wrote in his defence. The meetings were continued by Schade, and severer measures fol- lowed ^ ; Pietism, as it was then first called, was ^ The Magistri were allowed in the ferice caniciilares to read theological lectures. (Kanst. ebend. S. 119.) ^ The principal accusations against Francke were, that he had spoken against philosophy and disputation, and had maintained that the Christian's happiness began on earth ; those against the students, that they had burnt their abstracts of the lectures, spoken ill of polemic, &c. ^ The so-called Pietistic students were deprived of their pensions ; any one who attended one of these meetings was re- fused his testimonials, excluded from any office, &c. yet the Leipzig Protocol names nothing fanatical which had taken place in them. It must be observed, that the name of Pietists was Jiot assumed by themselves, but given to them, snccringly, by 88 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST forbidden, and a harsh contest carried on, prin- cipally by Carpzov, until the erection of the new University allowed the reform to be pursued undisturbed, though not unopposed \ The free circulation of talent or merit, which has ever taken place through every part of Ger- many, independent of the accident of the spot of its first formation, gave more importance to the new institution, than would, perhaps, in this country be generally conceived. Halle became, like Geneva of old, the heart from which the impulse of the new principles became felt in every part of the system. In the first thirty years of its institution, 6034 Theologians had been admitted into it, besides the thousands which were educated at the numerous schools supported in the Orphan-House founded ^ by Francke. An their opponents, who themselves took that of the Orthodox. (Schrbckh. 43. 272.) ^ The next year, (1795), produced the Wittenberg Manifesto against Spener ; and Carpzov, in a second Programm which he wrote against him, did not hesitate to term this mild and peaceful man a procellam ecclesise, tempestatem pacis, turbonem religionis, nay, a Spinozist. The irritation against Spener did not cease even with his death ; it was a question at different Uni- versities whether the term " beatus Spener" could be used. Professor Fecht, of Rostock, published a work, " De beatitu- dine mortuorum in Domino," in which he decides that this could be said of the extremely impious, who die without any external mark of repentance ; of all sinners but those who die in the com- mission of gross sin (Par. 18.) but not of Spener. (See at length in Kanstein's Leben. S. 109 — 117.) Others, who decided simi- larly, are mentioned generally by Weism. 1168; the contrary was even declared sinful. Niemeyer, ib. S. 32. * This establishment, which was comnen.ed by I'rancke, in CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 89 institution, which collaterally perfected, by the opportunities which it afforded for catechetical instruction, the practical character of the ministers educated at Halle'. The usefulness of these preparations was further promoted by the estab- lishment of Kanstein, a disciple of Spener, for the printing of Bibles, (by which much more than two millions of Bibles, and a million of Testaments have been circulated), and that for the printing of Christian writings and for the cheaper sale of books of education. The plan pursued at Halle was conducted by its first founders on the principles of Spener, the same as those of the earlier Reformation ; a recurrence from human forms and human systems to the pure source of faith in Scripture ; a substitution of practical religion for scholastic subtleties and unfruitful speculation. On these two points then, the promotion of scriptural study and of the practical direction of the several theological sciences, turns the peculiar method of the instruc- tion of Halle. Scripture interpretation again 1697, with seven gulden (14 sh.) so much increased before his death, that 600 children were supported daily, 2000 instructed, 120 teachers maintained. It was a pattern for many others, and a nursery for instructors in the schools of every class (Henke, iv. 548, fg.) Yet even this institution did not escape the censure of the orthodox party; e. g. V. E. Loscher Unsch, Nachr. and Meyer, (ap. Henke, ib.) The Danish Missionary Institution was subsequently erected there, and the interest in the extension of the Gospel abroad was influential, as it always is, in promoting its domestic progress. ^ Niemcyer, ib. S. 53. fg. 90 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST became as among the first Reformers, the root of theological study. It was theoretically promoted by the lectures ^ of the highly-gifted and learned Francke, on the " Principles of Interpretation," which tended, at least negatively, to free it from the subserviency to doctrinal systems, both by their own extensive immediate influence, and as the foundation of the work of Rambach, which was nearly exclusively employed for almost half a century '^ Though the principle of the analogy of faith was still held as the basis of right interpre- tation, its abuses were in some measure checked both by positive restrictions, and by the simpli- fication of the system itself; and though on the other side the predominantly practical character may, by directing the search to a higher spiritual meaning beyond that of the letter, have minis- tered occasion to subsequent arbitrariness, yet Francke does not seem to have intended more than the acknowledged and important truth, that a deeper and more spiritual study will ever find a deeper truth in Scripture, or than the legiti- mate employment of analogical application. With this theory of biblical exposition, were united lectures on all the principal parts of the Bible, embracing principally the practical side ; a course not to be judged of according to the usual character of practical commentaries, in which ^ The Manuductio ad lectionetn Script. Sacrae, frequently reprinted in German and Latin, and in the latter language even in England. - Schrockh, 4'2. 614. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 91 the topics dwelt upon are rather united with, than deduced from the text. Independent study of Scripture was further encouraged by the successive correction of passages in Luther's version, (remarkable as the first published ' at- tempt in the same language), an attempt which, in Francke, can only indicate anxiety ^ for their better understanding, and freedom from the pre- vailing timidity, which an adherence to system had engendered. Of lasting service, finally, for the extension of Biblical knowledge, were the Collegium Orientale Theologicum, and the Semi- narium Ministrorum Ecclesige, of which the former, besides promoting the study of the lan- guages connected with the Old Testament, and giving rise to the first critical edition of the Hebrew Bible ^ contributed to the propagation of ^ That which the learned Saubert commenced at the command of Aiigust, Duke of Brunswick, 1665, was broken off" in the midst of 1 Sam. 17, at the death of the Duke, and even the published part suppressed (Schrockh 42, 598, Henke, 3, 285, fg'.) so completely, that Buddeus, ib. p. 112, supposes it never to have been published. Calov and others raised a clamour against it before they had seen it, and its continuation was pro- bably prevented by the influence of one of the polemic preachers removed from Brandenburg. * It gave rise, however, to bitter invectives against Francke, from Meyer, Beck, and others of the orthodox party. Meyer entitles one of his, " a warning to students not to be led astray by Francke's work ;" in another he calls this work " a temptation of Satan, by which he endeavours to cast into yet worse confusion the on every side persecuted Church." See on the controversy Budd. p. 1 360, sqq. Walch Religions-streitigk. 1 Th. S. 731 , fg. * That of J. H. Michaclis, completed by the assistance of 92 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST Christianity among the Jews and Mohammedans \ The same practical character was given by Breit- haupt and Freylinghausen to doctrinal studies ; after the example of Spener, all scholastic, and even unbiblical terminology, except what was admitted by the universal church, was excluded, and the long-forgotten element of Christian ex- perience was by the former restored ^ In moral theology, though as yet little cultivated as a science, the declarations of this school in the Adiaphoristic controversy, that no action was to the individual who performed it indifferent, evinced a deeper insight into the principles of Christian action^. Polemic again was taught by Breithaupt and Anton, (Vater S. 366), which is even now of use; the same institution also gave birth to the valuable work of J. H. and C. B. Michaelis on the Hagiographa. ^ See J. L. Schulze in Francken's Stiftungen, B. I. S. 209, ap. Vat. S. 365. ^ Freylinghausen in the Grundlegung der Theologie, Budd. ■p. 362; on Breithaupt's Instit. Theol. see Budd. p. 361. and 390. ' On this as on every other occasion, in which this controversy has been renewed, both parties appear to have forgotten the principle which seems to lie in the precepts of St. Paul, that, though nothing is indifferent to individuals, many things are so, except to individuals ; the character of the action depending entirely upon the influence which it exerts upon the mind of the person performing it, some of them may have more tendency than others to produce an ill effect, and thus lose to a certain degree the character of acih^opa, yet none but the individual himself can know whether they have that effect, and therefore though a minister may warn of their tendency, they must still in each case remain matters of private judgment. In the present case, however, not merely the usual topics of this controversy, but the pleasures of the appetite, the desire of honor, glory, riches, CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 93 Anton, according to the beautiful view of Spener, in which every real heresy was considered as it originated in moral defects ; the heretic was regarded as one labouring under a disease ; the teacher recollected, that though exempt from this, he was not free from other diseases, and endeavoured to restore him as a friend, not to ha- rass him as an antagonist. The greatest change, however, was in the science, whose better culti- vation was one great object of all these, pastoral theology : the defects of the former century had, in the orthodox school, become confirmed in the commencement of this; what was then custom, had now become law ; the train of grammatical, histo- rical, polemical, expositions of the text, was now fixed in the elementary treatises; they varied only, in that now the fivefold practical applica- tion consisted in the polemic against the pietists. The style was full of the same pedantic display and unnatural conceits ; and as if to prevent the possibility of free-exertion of mind, the artificial plans of arranging the discourse were now inva- riably determined ; and ingenuity and strength were wasted and perverted in arranging the same text according to the greatest variety of methods \ The practical character of the whole and pre-eminence, were placed by the orthodox party among things indifferent, see Weism. p, 1250. ^ These were swelled by the often-mentioned J. B. Carpzov to 100; some of them were named from the mode of treating the text, some from the inventor, some from the university where they were the most used, e. g. Leipzig, Helmstadt, Konigsberg, 6 94 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST theology of Halle must necessarily introduce better principles ; method, style, and illustration were no longer valued for themselves, but as means ; a right and faithful application of Scrip- tural Interpretation, Doctrinal Theology, and Christian moral to catechetic and pulpit instruc- tions, were a main object of the Collegia Biblica ; the previous system, whose defects originated in an entire misconception of the preacher's office, fell at once * among those who became acquaint- ed with a more living Christianity ; that, by which it was replaced, was guarded against its natural deflection, a neglect of all rules, by the scientific developement of Lange and Rambach ^ as it was Wittenberg:, (Schuler, 1 Th. S. 180, fg. ; 2 Th. S. 8, fg. ap. Schiockh, 43, 160-1.) To apply 50 of these plans to a single text was considered a meritorious performance ; Lbscher indeed, according to Sclirdckh_, reduced them to 25, but " those he re- tained were in their execution not much better than the rest," (Id. ibid.) ^ The vain display of pedantic learning seems to have been among the most deeply rooted evils ; against this Francke and Freylinghausen, (both distinguished preachers, and the latter considered as the best model of his age, see Knapp, Francken's Stiftungen, 2 B. S. 305.) opposed the principle of Luther, who " in Wittenberg did not preach to the 40 doctors or magistri who might be there, but to the crowd of young people, children, and populace." — "To them," added Luther, "I preach; to them I conform myself; according to their wants I speak; if the rest like it not thus simply, the door stands open." Francke in his lectures refers to the example of our Saviour, who had indeed in the Pharisees learned hearers, yet told them in what they were wanting, in terms as simple as could be used. ^ R,ambach was one of the most active and efficient disciples of the school of Halle ; though not possessed of an original mind, nor CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 95 practically realized in the preacliing of Francke and Freylinghausen. Two apparently slight in- novations, the alternation of continuous explana- tions of large portions of Scripture ^ with the usual synthetic preaching, and the occasional selection of passages not contained in the appointed sec- tions of the Church, as subjects of the discourses, are too obvious improvements to have been noticed, but that the general adherence to all the defects of the hereditary system implies the more decided practical character in those who perceived them. The doubt of the sufficiency of these pericopse, which had been continued as they had existed in Germany previous to the able to strike out new views, he has well embodied in a scientific form the practical principles of his school. He was widely in- fluential in his life at Halle, Jena, and Giessen, and was referred to even by Mosheim as the best model for general preaching-. (Schrbckh, ib. 170.) His Wohlunterrichteter Catechet, 1722, and his Erlauterung iiber die Preecepta homiletica, a posthumous work, were long the best and favourite treatises in each depart- ment. Lange's work was the Oratoria Sacra ab artis homileticae vanitate repurgata. ^ The advantages of this species of lecture, alternating with discourses on set subjects, are sufficiently obvious, and have been witnessed by the author in Germany ; the most fruitful source of mistakes in doctrine, the interpretation of texts independent of and contrary to the context, to which so great occasion is given by the division into verses, is thereby, and thereby alone can it be, checked ; the understanding of Scripture in private study is materially facilitated ; the habit of investigating its mean- ing, and of considering its varied references, is substituted for a mere perusal of its letter ; the instruction conveyed is more easily recollected, being as it were incorporated with the passage explained. 96 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST Reformation \ but which both limited the know- ledge of Scripture, and the subjects of the dis- courses, and interfered with the natural connec- tion and the order of these subjects, was re- ceived as a mark of alienation from the Lu- theran Church^. Spener's principles of catechis- ing, (the Socratic method) again were expanded by Rambach, and the readiness acquired in the practice of the Orphan-house added to the supe- riority to the teachers of Halle. This practical theological tendency was furthered by private intercourse of a corresponding character; at regularly recurring seasons of the week, the character of a theologian, as a servant of the Church, the necessity of not forgetting the one thing needful amid the earnestness of intellectual study, was illustrated and impressed ; the circum- stances promoting or advancing right theological study were discussed; the scientific and practical elements were blended in the Collegia Biblica ; other meetings were held, in which the pro- fessors were consulted as fathers ; so that most students were known personally to them ; theolo- gians of evil lives were recommended to em- brace some other profession. ^ Budd. Isag. 1343, 1412, 1426, sq. some evils attending them are briefly alluded to, ib. 1430. ^ E. g. in Loscher's diss. Auticalviniana de pericopis Evang. et Apostol. The pericopse for the morning service being mostly taken from the Gospels, and a large proportion being accounts of miracles, the subjects of Christian instruction must, v^'here there was no evening lecture, if the pericopa be adhered to, be either omitted, or very artificially connected with the text. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 97 The influence of this system was, for a time, felt not in Germany alone, but in Denmark, in Sweden, even in Greece, in mount Athos ; teachers of youth, and ministers were sought from Halle, in every part of Germany ' ; others were kindled by their example, and the plans of benevolence as well as the piety of Halle were extended in the places, whither they were invited ^ The bodies, thus organized, long continued to exist, and indeed never wholly lost their influ- ence, though the master-movement, which had first given them impulse, slackened, and in great measure ceased, with the death of Francke, and the first founders of the school. The same spirit more or less influenced C. B. Michaelis, the younger Francke, Freilinghausen, the elder Knapp, Q' cujus vita," says his biographer Niis- selt \ " commentatio ceternitatis fuit ;") Callen- berg, (the pious founder of the institutions for * Niemeyer, 1. c. S. 53. ^ Vid. inter al. Niemeyer, 1. c. S. 58. ^ Sammlung Nosseltsch. Aufsatz. von Niemeyer, S. 192, where the character of this perfect Christian is at large described. The separation, however, of the theoretical and practical side of Theology had already commenced, and diminished the influence of G. Francke, Knapp, and Callenberg. (On the two last see Semler's Lebensbeschreibung, 1 Th. S. 87. ig^.) The unaffected and pure piety of Knapp obtained him veneration even from those, whose scientific requisitions he did not satisfy ; yet, though he possessed respectable learning, his influence appears, even iu the account of Nosselt, to have been principally practical. On Francke and Callenberg, see also Niemeyer, der Univ. Halle, S. 72. {'^, II 98 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST the conversion of Jews and Mohammedans,) and Baumgarten. Yet in part the times themselves were altered ; a too predominant cultivation of the mere understanding had commenced even in the latter days of Francke, as himself complains ' ; the antagonists against whom the school had to contend, were differently and more scientifically formed ; in part also the system itself was liable to misrepresentation, in part exposed actually to suffer both from scientific and moral degeneracy. Of the liability to mis-statement, their Pseudo- Lutheran opponents had fully availed themselves. Not only had they excited popular violence ^, and obtained the interposition of civil interference to suppress the " schools of piety ^;" but had dili- * In a lecture, 1709, upon the difference of the present and former students of Theology. ^ As in the tumults at Hamburg-, where Meyer (formerly Pro- fessor at Wittenberg,) irritated by Spener's official remonstrances on his life, having first attempted to impose a new formula of sub- scription upon Spener's brother-in-law, Horbius, preached against him as a lying prophet and priest of Baal ; so that Horbius having once escaped at the risk of life, was obliged to leave the city by night. See Vater, 360. Henke, iv. 525. fgg. ^ Henke gives, from Walch's Religionsstreit. and the Pantheon Anabaptistar. et enthusiast., the following list of places where edicts were published against the Pietists: Wolfenbiittel, (1692) ; Gotha, (1697); Zelle, (1698); Hannover, (1703); Bremen, (1705); Stutgard, (1706) ; Nurnberg, (1707) ; Zerbst, (1709) ; Hannover again, (1710 and 1711); Berlin, (1711); and says that the list, in Germany, might easily be increased. It was also proscribed in Sweden and Denmark; (Henk. S. 528.) in Wolfenbiittel even some clergy were forbidden to meet to read the Scripture together, and, on refusal to comply, were removed to lower stations ; in Erfurt CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 99 gently confounded their tenets, principles, and objects with those of the wildest and most dis- graceful fanatics, whose appearance always tar- nishes and obstructs, and seems indeed an evil almost inseparable from, any great and sudden re- vival of religion. It were scarcely credible, but for the knowledge that every fanatical sect was classed, with Wickliffe, under the same title of Lollard, and that Luther had some difficulty in separating his cause from that of the Anabap- tists, that the immediate and pure followers of Spener should have been identified by their oppo- nents with the most wretched and abandoned fanatics of their times, that the degrading ex- cesses of the deeply-sunken view of Butler ^ should have been deprecated under the title of Pietism. Old and new titles of heresies were put in requi- sition to stigmatize the school of Halle ; Pelagian- ism, Socinianism, Jesuitism, Schwenkfeldianism, Osiandrism, were, with many others, found ^ united all meetings to read the Bible were forbidden under penalty of a fine of 151. ; and when Sagittarius, writing in defence of Francke, asserted that Pietism was only a living Christianity, the Elector of Saxony wrote to the Duke of Weimar to inform him of, and to request him duly to punish, his unquiet Professor Thcologiaj. ^ This was done by the above-named Meyer, then Gen. Super- intendant in Pomerania ; and Breithaupt and Francke were com- pelled to disclaim all connection with these miscreants. (Walch, Th. 11. S. 769. ap. Vat. 367. Henke, 8. 40, 41.) They answered, that the faculty of Halle had nothing to do with those called Pietists in that report, but that it were " better that the name were altogether omitted." " Henke quotes (iv. 520, 521) the following titles of treatises n 2 100 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST ill their principles ; and tliougli, following the example of Spener \ they earnestly opposed them- selves to every manifestation of a schismatical spirit, they were invariably charged with a Phari- saical separatism. More dangerons, however, than external violence, were the liabilities to degene- racy in the system itself The abuse lay so close to the use, the means employed were in such close against the Pietists. Meyer de Pietistis veteris ecclesiae — de So- cinianismo Pietistarum — de fraternitate P. et Jesuitarum — Loescher de Schwenkfeldianismo in Pietismo renato — Edzardi Machiavellus Pietisticus. — Biicher Rathmanna redivivus. — Fecht de Pelagianismo a Lutheranor. doctrina depulso — epistolse anti- prsedestianae. — Wernsdoff Osiandrismus in Pietismo redivivus, &c. According to the definition of Schelwig, another oppo- nent, " Pietism is a sect, instituted and promoted by Spener, of Anabaptists, Schwenkfeldians, WeigeHans, Rathmannians, La- badists, Quakers, and other fanatics, (under the pretence of a new Reformation and of the hope of better times) for the haras- sing and final destruction of the Church attached to the Augs- burg Confession, and the other symbolical books." Weism. ib. 1211. ^ Spener uniformly and earnestly set himself against the Phari- saical separation, which occasionally manifested itself, even in the earlier period of his ministry. (Schrockh, 43. 265.) His principles may be partly collected from the extracts already given, partly from his, " der Klagen lib. d. verdorbene Christenthum Missbrauch u. rechter Gebrauch." Frft. 1684, 1696, (cp hisTheol. Bedenk. Th. 1. S. 634. Consil. P. iii. S. 517.) Towards the end of his life, Spener equally opposed the too general declamations of Schade against the Confessional as tending to produce di- visions. It were easy to multiply instances or authorities ; suffice the brief statement of the ecclesiastical historian ; " Never did Spener, or any of his genuine disciples, favour separatism in the Church." (Schr. ib. 285.) CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 101 connection with principles, where self-deception is most easy and most dangerous, they required for their exertion the combination of such varied gifts ; (not deep piety alone, but sound judgment, and extensive knowledge of human nature,) that decay and abuse were much to be apprehended, as soon as the comprehensive mind, which first set them in action, was withdrawn. Ail religious forms, and especially those expressive of religious feeling, have a tendency to lose the spirit by which they were originally animated ; this may again be revived, but in the mean-time the employment of the form alone, whose significance is either insensibly changed or wholly lost, produces in those who use it, a more or less conscious hypocrisy. The whole history of the Church furnishes the proof, that every new strong awakening of religious feeling brings with it a peculiar form of express- ing that feeling ; it gives, too, the painful con- firmation, that in all cases the form has been con- tinued, when the spirit, which produced it, is departed. The same phenomenon is found in in- dividuals as well as in classes ; the language of early days is frequently retained, while the feel- ing, w hich produced that language, exists only in reminiscence of those times. This aberration is the more injurious, in that, while the conscious hypocrisy generally invests itself in the mere ex- ternal peculiarities or practices, which in the first instance arose from religious principle, the com- paratively, and often almost Avholly, unconscious consists in the adherence to the language which 102 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST originally expressed deep religious feeling, or for which either other ideas are imperceptihly sub- stituted, or those before entertained are, for a time alone, renewed. The temporary feeling, excited by the recurrence to these forms, induces or facili- tates, self-deception ; the use of the forms, desti- tute of their spirit, deadens, yet further, that spirit in the individual. The form, in which the re- awakened Christianity exhibited itself in the time of Spener, may be considered in contrast with the subsequent deflections, under the heads of the language and actions, in which it expressed itself, and of the means of its preservation or extension. In none of these are the first founders of the Pietistic school open to censure. The re- ligious language of Spener and Francke possesses all the copiousness, and purity, and life, natural to minds deeply penetrated by their subject, im- bued with the treasures of Scripture, and suffi- ciently enlarged to reject no expressions, by whomsoever they might have been before used, which furnished a pure vehicle of Christian sen- timent and Christian devotion. The unpractical formulae of the school alone were set aside, other language, whether of the orthodox or the mys- tics, but especially from the pure and rich foun- tain of Luther, was, under this single limitation, equally admitted ; and the deadening effects of uniform or systematic expression were thus ob- viated. Tlie later Pietists contracted, instead of expanding and perpetuating, this system ; on the one hand they liii)ited their richer ])y a too hasty CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 103 rejection of much of the moral language of the orthodox school, as well as of the expressions of the Moravians, who had arisen from among them ; on the other, the original freshness of the stamp of their own was worn away, and what had once conveyed the " free spirit" of Spener became as technical and lifeless as the phraseo- logy of the orthodox, to which it had been op- posed, and more pernicious, from the very depth of its original significance. A mere vague and general meaning was attached to what had ori- ginally conveyed definite Christian ideas. II. The means adopted to preserve and extend this spirit were, as above stated, meetings for the practical study of Scripture, for mutual consul- tation and assistance, and more than ordinary domestic and public devotion. The strongest hold of formalism is in the very means employed to promote devotion : great watchfulness is requisite against self-deception, from considering them as more than means ; great discrimination in the re- commendation of these means to others. In both, lamentable mistakes were committed by the later members of this school ; hypocrisy was engendered by the too great stress laid upon private edifying and Christian conversation ; their indiscriminate ^ ^ This indiscriminateness manifested itself in the anxiety to induce all the students, on their entering the University, to par- ticipate in all these meeting-s, without regard to the stage of Christianity in which each might then be ; and in the ill estima- tion in which those were held, who omitted them when inter- fering with their studies. The failure to perceive that these 104 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST ^ and too frequent employment, where the mind was yet unprepared to profit by them, the use of " strong meat" where " milk" alone could nourish, produced, often, re-action and disgust ; in other cases religious conversation was engaged in as a mere act of duty, and as a test of religion ; and the probably but half-conscious, hypocrisy, which employed the expressions, without a correspond- ing feeling, of religion, deadened the heart. III. The actions, finally, in which the religious spirit manifested itself were in part only liable to per- version ; neither the zeal for plans of benevo- lence, nor the resignation of expensive gratifica- tions to promote them, which distinguished the school of Halle, nor the highly-prospered efforts to extend Christianity among the heathen, were well susceptible of it. The degree of value, however, attached to the abstinence from amuse- ments, whose character is derived solely from their influence upon each individual, (the so-called o8ta(/)opa,) became a source both of self-deception and of breaches of Christian charity ; a deflection. meetings were for that, and for most ages, too crowded, seems scarcely credible. On the Sunday there were, one with the citizens, two in the afternoon with the Professors, (also purely practical,) one in the family in the evening-, each lasting an hour, besides the three times attending divine service. Much of the character of the later system of Halle, and of its incidental disadvantages, may be collected from Semler's autobiography ; from this it appears, that when the attendance at these meetings began to be valued for i"ts ov/n sake, the perfect rectitude of the means employed to induce attendance was notalwavs reearded. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 105 invariably occurring, as soon as the abstinence is regarded as being in itself a Christian duty. A legal yoke is then substituted for Christian freedom ; and things, in the first instance acknow- ledged by the party itself to be of subordinate im- portance, become the tests of Christian progress. it thus became common to exclude from the communion persons known to have danced, or to have played at cards \ The great object, lastly, of the early school, the promotion of practical, living Christianity around them, became a mere external duty, and being consequently pursued mechanically, alienated, too often, instead of winning to the Gospel. It has been necessary to go through this pain- ful detail, both as it is fruitful in admonition to our own, to all, times, and in that without it, the want of resistance from the school of the Pietists to the subsequent invasion of unbelief would be unaccounted for. It is obvious, however, that these observations relate to the diminution of its influence in its original seat, not to the branches, wliich in its earlier state it had. sent forth. These may have been, and doubtless were, permanently as well as extensively influen- tial, though the result of their insulated exertions ^ Among other cases a Graf von Reuss (born 1717.) issued an edict to this purport. Mutual opposition seems to have occasioned the opposite excesses of the two parties ; on this ground alone can be explained the blas[)henious measure of an orthodox preacher, who pubUshed a formula of prayer to win at cards. 106 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST cannot be presented by history K It is the mis- fortune of the history of all religion, that the silent but by far the largest influences which it exerts, those of individual and private life, can form no portion of the annals of mankind. An unfair, a very inadequate, too frequently an unfa- vorable, representation can alone result from the exclusive contemplation of the great phenome- na, which public history records ; the cases, in which religion has been made by bad men the instrument and the plea of ambition, the Inqui- sition, the devastation of America, the dragon- nades of France, the expatriation of hundreds of thousands from that land, can be, and have been, faithfully recorded ; of the blessings which it has produced not the thousand thousandth part is known to any but to Him, to whom alone all hearts are open ; who has seen the evil and un- disclosed passions, which it has, in silence, over- come ; the sorrows it has cheered ; the difficult duties it has given strength to perform ; the kindly and benevolent feelings which it has pro- duced ; the hearts, in which the love of God has created, expanded, hallowed the love to man. A few such cases, a few of its great results, we are allowed to see, to weigh down the record of incidental evil ; the immeasurably greater pro- portion is reserved for that day, in which all secret good, as well as secret evil, shall be disco- vered. Privacy is often the condition, as well as ^ Sec Niemcyer, ibid. S. 56. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 107 the natural element, of religious good. As the value of the great and fearful element, whose uses are so essential to us, is generally felt most in its privation ; at other times, perhaps, we think chiefly of it, where it is most visible, in its destructive effects, in the devastations of the storm, or the conflagration of our cities, and forget, or cannot calculate, the innumerable hearths which it in silence cheers, the thousand comforts or necessa- ries of life, to which it is essential ; so, and much more, is it with that spiritual fire, which first kin- dles into being the noblest energies of our nature, which, realizing, in a higher sense the heathen fable of man's formation, converts the sordid, in- animate, though well-formed, mass of clay, into a living spirit, warming and enlightening and purifying the best affections. By far the greater proportion of its influences can be known to none ; and even of the slight proportion, which admits of being manifested in external action, most are witnessed but by few, in the narrow sphere of their immediate influence ; collectively, none know them. For the conduct of those, who, for worldly ends, in conscious hypocrisy, assumed the lan- guage, habits, and exterior of the Pietists, these are, of course, no farther responsible, than as, by adopting injudicious and insuflicient tests, they may have facilitated the imposture. It afforded, however, large scope for misrepresenta- tion and misconception. Opportunities for tliis deception occurred in Halle itself, and yet more 108 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST in some of tlie courts of the lesser German princes \ At Halle, so soon as a particular tone or language came to be considered as indications of Christian piety, they were, of course, in many instances, adopted by students, who wished to obtain the oftlces at the disposal of the in- structors. At some courts the use of the lan- guage, which had received the supposed stamp of piety, facilitated the advance, not only in ecclesi- astical, but even in civil, offices. The hollowness thus occasioned was discovered at the death of these mistaken promoters of piety, when the tone of the court forthwith resumed its genuine and undissembled character ^ It now remains only briefly to mention the scientific deflections to which the system was ex- posed. It is the natural and universal tendency of every school, on the one hand, to convert what was originally a predominant only, into an exclusive, character ; on the other, gradually to lose sight of and to omit what at first occupied a subordinate, though essential, place. The aim of Spener, Francke, and the first Pietists was, we ^ Among these were the courts of Graf Heinrich II. von Reuss ; Graf von StoUberg-Wernigrode ; Duke Ernest of Saal- feld ; Prince August of Mecklenburg ; and the King of Den- mark. Great weight having been attached to the power of making long extemporary prayer, as a sign of real conversion, a Duke of Coburg required the masters of schools to utter these in his presence, as a test of their fitness for advancement. ^ This was especially visible at the courts of Wernigrode and Saalfeld. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 109 have seen, to give theology a practical charac- ter ; though they endeavoured to promote true science, still the practical results were their main object. The deflection, of course, was, in those who maintained the strict character of the school, that the practical character of Theology became all in all ; that science was either lightly regarded or despised ; in others, such as the in many respects valuable Baumgarten, the scien- tific element too largely predominated. The se- paration was the more natural, in that the two parts, the scientific and the religious interests, were rather united than blended in the first founders of the school. Through these unhappy deflections, great as was the temporary influence of the first institu- tion, permanent the benefits communicated in a narrower circle by individuals whom it had sent forth, and the indirect influence of its first teachers, when the irritation of party feeling was with- drawn, upon many who cannot be counted among its adherents, it was disabled, as a body, from opposing any effectual resistance to the inunda- tion of unbelief, or from diminishing the rigidness of prejudice by which this re-action was in part produced. The rapid decay of this attempt to reform the barren orthodoxism by a recurrence to practical and unspeculating Christianity increased the apparent hopelessness of such a re-animation. The fanaticism coincident, and by the enemies of the effort identified, with it, alienated from the wish for a remedy. The rationalist tendencies 110 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST of the age were promoted by this treble exhibi- tion of the aberrations of belief, through which it was presented to the superficial or the pre- sumptuous, as a speculative system, oppressive to the intellectual without communicating energy to the moral powers, as the garb of hypocrisy, or the dream of a bewildered imagination. Science was inlisted against it not only by its self-confidence in its own strength, but by the perversion in the orthodox, the contempt in the pseudo-pietist and fanatic, bodies, the opposition by all. There was indeed one body of men ', who. ' The chief characteristics of this class are clearness of views, good judgment, and well-digested learning, yet without either distinguished acuteness or depth of mind, or broad and general principles. As repertoria of information, their works are conse- quently valuable ; they filled up some of the details of science, but were unable to advance its limits, or to give it a secure and large basis. The theological system might have received through their means a beneficial simplification, had a sufficient interval elapsed to permit it to be imperceptibly modified, but its character was too little pronounced to have much effect in the violent collisions which followed. Of the individuals mentioned Buddeus is duly appreciated among us, Mosheim is unfortunately principally known by a most unfaithful translation of one, and that not his best, work, from which a false estimate alone can be formed of his intellectual, moral, and religious character. The author has found, from collation, the original in so many cases offensively coloured and disguised by gratuitous interpolations of epithets, or of whole sentences, that collation seems to him absolutely indispensable, wherever it is of importance to know the precise sentiment or statement of Mosheim. A close translation would probably reduce the work to half its present size. Mosheim, besides his 6 CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. Ill though not belonging to the school of the pietists, would never have existed without their collision with the opposed system, such as Buddeus, Mosheim, PfafF, &c. men of great learning, and practical minds, who acted beneficially in a limited sphere, and who would have been an ornament to any existing party, but who did not possess sufficient calibre or comprehensiveness themselves to form one, to give a permanent direction to the character of the age, or to satisfy the whole intent of its scientific requisitions. Their existence is however to be accounted among the benefits con- ferred by pietism, and they form a memorable historical phenomenon in the course of the new theological developement. More directly ema- nating from the Pietists was the school, which, descending from Bengel and Storr, remained amid increasing degeneracy, as witnesses of the prac- ticability of the union of a deep piety, genuine orthodoxy, and scientific investigation ; and who while they candidly admitted into their system the real advances of theological science, in part works on Ecclesiastical History, which first raised the science in Germany above the character of a chronicle, and furnished an im- partial estimate of the character of the opposed parties, was the author of several commentaries on Scripture, which, without great depth, were valuable for a good developement of the connection in each book. His work on Scriptural Moral, though not sufficiently scientific, has much that is valuable ; his sermons long remained models of pulpit eloquence. (Schr. 41. 168. 43. 169. fg.) Pfaff commenced a reform in the mode of treating the types of the Old Testament, in Doctrinal Theology, and in the principles of Ecclesiastical Law. 112 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST successfully opposed the illegitimate innovations incidental to its earlier stages. Though some intellectual deficiencies limited their immediate influence, they were to a certain degree the pat- terns, as well as the precursors of what a maturer age is now richly completing. In their own times, even their moderate corrections of the faults of the received system were regarded with suspicion and refutations K Before passing to the last systematic struggle, which the orthodox school had to encounter pre- vious to the final conflict, two men of very different character, but both in some measure connected with the Pietists, may be mentioned, each of whom effected some alteration, if not in the sys- tem itself, yet upon the opinions of the times ; Arnold and Thomasius. It affords, indeed, in it- self, no small presumption of the untenableness of that system, that no attack was made upon it, (even previously to the altered character of those days, which witnessed its dissolution,) without producing some corresponding impression. Ar- nold originally belonged to the Pietists. A gloomy mind, and a want of sufficient confidence in Him, to whom all is possible, made him resign his Pro- fessorship at Giessen, from despair of producing any amendment in the dissolute habits of the stu- dents, yet unable, as he expresses it himself, to endure to see hundreds, who should hereafter have the cure of souls, but who never appeared * See Semler Lebensbeschreibung, 2 Th. S. 146. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 113 yet to have had a thought of their own. He afterwards applied his vast learning and ingenuity to the reform of ecclesiastical history ; yet, mis- led by his dislike of the orthodoxism of his own days, and of the fruitless and wanton multiplica- tion of heresies, as well as of the injustice uniform- ly perpetuated towards any whom the prevailing- Church had on any occasion stamped as heretics, he manifested scarcely less partiality to all who had been so denominated, than had hitherto ex- isted against them. There was, however, enough of truth in his views to shake the previously pre- vailing opinion, that the party, which succeeded for the time in establishing their own orthodoxy, was always in the right. The influence of Tho- masius, (as, indeed, the general character of his mind was more calculated to destroy than to build up,) was rather exerted in the demoli- tion of detached prejudices, and in the promo- tion of a greater freedom and independence of thought, than in producing any comprehensive innovation in the system. The bitterness, vehe- mence, and occasional buffoonery of his satire, was deservedly a further obstacle to his success. He removed, however, many insulated errors \ ^ Such were the importance of church ceremonies not ordained by Christ or the Apostles, (in his " Rechte EvangeHschen Fiirsten in Mitteldingen oder Kirchencarimonien"), the right of civil in- terference in matters of faith, except as far as concerns the public peace, (Das Recht Evangelischen Fiirsten in Religions- streitigkeiten,) the opinion that heresy implied perverscness of will, or was penal, (ob Ketzerei ein straf bares Vcrbrcchen sey, and I 114 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST and by the overthrow of the dominion of the Aristotelic philosophy prepared the way for the dominion of that of Wolf. The previous conflicts had acted rather in di- minishing the extent than in changing the cha- racter of the orthodox school, in detaching some portion of its empire, than in any change of its own internal constitution. The Wolfian philo- sophy was received into the system itself, and with the temporary appearance of adding to its strength, contributed, ultimately, to its fall. It seems, in- deed, to have been the fate of every successive philosophy in Germany, to he at first indiscrimi- nately opposed by the Theologians, and then to have been unduly admitted into their own science. Experience, and a surer ground of faith has now shewn them the right place of philosophy, as an auxiliary science, and subdued the hostility with- " vom Recbte Evangelischen Fiirsten gegen d. Ketzerei,") and many other points derived from, or connected with, these. He laid the foundation for the removal of numerous others by the study of ecclesiastical history, both for itself, (cp. Niemeyer, Univ. Halle, S. 47,) and as necessary for the understanding of ecclesi- astical law ; (Hochstnothige Cautelen, welche ein studiosus Juris, der sich zur Erlernung der Kirchenrechts-gelahrtheit vorbereiten will, zu beobachten hat.) Schrbckh, 42. 542, 548. He was opposed at the time by the theologians, especially by the oft- named Ben. Carpzov, but his services have since been acknow- ledged with gratitude, and himself styled the reformer of eccle-- siastical law, (Schrockh, ib. Henke, iv. S. 252. 537, fg. 577, fgg.) It may be added, that he first removed in Germany the heathenish superstition of witches, sorcery, &c. so frequent a source of cruelty, the denial of whose truth B. Carpzov had declared a punishable offence. (Henke, ib. p. 581. fg.) CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 115 out producing the yet more unnatural identifica- tion K The principal opposition, with which Wolf at first met, was from the Pietists, among whom he taught at Halle. The great importance, which he ascribed to the employment of his science in Theology, appeared to be dangerous ; his adoption of Leibnitz's " predetermined har- mony" to involve the admission of fatalism ; his ^ There are at present but few representatives of this system, such as Daub and Marheinecke, who have converted doctrinal theology into the philosophy of Schelling and of Hagel, and De Wette, who is too much influenced by that of Fries. As Bretschneider has placed •^chleiermacher in this class, and the charge has been introduced into this country, it is but justice to that great man who, whatever be the errors of his system, has done more than (some very few perhaps excepted) any other, to the restoration of religious belief in Germany, to oppose to this assertion that of his distinguished and independent disciple, Twesten. (lb. S. 199 ) " Is it apprehended that the Nature- philosophy, amid its pretensions to absolute knowledge, will not respect the independence of the religious conviction, and only admit Christianity as far as it can introduce into it its own positions, or interpret it as a symbolical representation of them ? through Schleiermacher has the peculiar and independent source of religion in the human mind, and the original difference of •philosophy and doctrinal theology been set in so clear a light, that the invasion of the province of either by the other seems thereby to be adequately guarded against." It were contrary also to a maxim laid down by Schleiermacher himself. " The endeavour to introduce philosophical systems into theology is generally at variance with a correct interpretation of Scripture." Kurze Darstellung des theologischen Studiums, p. 51, a work, which, with a iew great defects, is full of important principles and comprehensive views, and which will form a new era in the- ology whenever the principles which it furnishes for the cultivation pf the several theological sciences shall be acted upon. I 2 116 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST rejection of some former methods of proving the existence of a Deity, to lead to atheism. Though he was, however, himself banished, through the combined representations of the Theologians of Halle and of some individuals at Berlin, his sys- tem, through its clearness, definiteness, syste- matic spirit, and consistency, which satisfied the philosophical wants of the times, gained ground continually, and was further cultivated and developed by the adherents whom it acquired. Through these it maintained its ascendancy until near the 18th century. Within a few years after the banishment of Wolf, the first attempt was made by a theologian (Canz ' of Tubingen) to in- * In his Usus Philosophiae Leibnitianae et Wolfianae in Theolo- gia, 1728. The theological faculty of TUbingen destroyed all the copies of the third part of this work, which they could find. Canz was followed by Reinbeck, who had great influence in all matters of rehgion in Prussia under both Frederics ; (he wrote " philosophic considerations upon the Augsburg Confession," which were continued by Canz and Alwahrdt;) by Ribov, Pro- fessor at Helmstadt and Gottingen, author of the " Institutiones Theologise dogmaticae methodo demonstrativa traditae," in which however he confines himself to the doctrines common to natural with revealed religion ; by Schubert at Helmstadt and Greifs- wald ; Carpov at Weimar ; Darjes at Jena, who applied the Wolfian mode of proof without limitation to revealed doctrine, and neglected Scriptural evidence. Thus the eternity of future punishment was to be demonstrated by Schubert : Darjes thought to establish the doctrine of the Trinity by algebraical formulee, (Tractatus philosophicus, in quo pluralitas personarum in Deitate, qua omnes conditiones, ex solis rationis principiis methodo ma- thematica demonstratur. 1735.) while Carpov applied the method in all its strictness to the whole existing system ; suffice that the CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 117 troduce his system into Doctrinal Theology ; others quickly succeeded ; and these established in different parts of Germany, at Gottingeu, Helmstadt, Berlin, Greifswald, Weimar, Jena, &c. formed different centres, whence it extended its influence by their oral instruction as well as by their writings. Notwithstanding the unques- tioned Christian principles of its author, its recep- tion tended to bring on the destruction of more Trinity, the nature and origin of the soul of Christ, his concep- tion, the imputation of Adam's sin, the incarnation of the Son of God, and the redemption of mankind thereby effected, the state of his soul after death, &c. were hence to derive their proof. ('* CEconomia Salutis N. T. methodo scientifica ador- nata," in four 4tos.) This last, though opposed, was defended by very many ; while none saw the extent of the evils of the system. (Schrbckh, 43, S. 28—37. Schlegel, K. G. vi. 102—108. Henke, vii. 55.) The " Tentamen Theol. dogm. methodo scien-i tifica pertractatee" (1741. three 8vos.) of Wyttenbach, though a Swiss divine, had much influence, and was even used as a com- pendium for lectures in Germany. (Schlegel, S. 108, 109.) The evils of this system, as summed up even in the Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek, B. 2. S. 183, were, the introduction of philosophical positions into the system of religion ; the equalizing what was certain or probable, problematical or established, what was left obscure in Scripture with what was clear ; the neglect or arbitrary application of Scripture interpretation, the philoso- phizing with, not always out of the Scripture; "so that had this method been continued. Scripture had no longer been the source of religious knowledge, but at most, a witness only, which yvas to confirm by its evidence the conclusion which was already arrived at." Crusius, though in part Opposed to this system, did not improve it; Scriptural proof occupied an equally subordinate place; the mode alone of philosophizing was changed, (Sclirockh, ib. S. 41 .) The author, however, survived his system. 118 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST than the system which it was called in to support, and to the encouragement of Rationalist princi- ples. The faulty portions, indeed, of the pre- vious system alone, would directly suffer from the spirit of deeper and more accurate investigation nurtured hy this philosophy ; yet indirectly it promoted many habits of mind, in part already existing, through which Christianity itself could not but be affected or mistaken. The disposition to give to reason not a negative merely, but a positive, decision in matters of faith was fostered by the habit of proving revealed doctrine by alge- braical formulae, or by philosophical grounds ; the abstract mode of treating its subjects aggravated the evils of the existing system, already too exclusively speculative ; uncertain philosophical tenets and hypotheses were introduced into the system of doctrine, as if equally established with Scriptural truth ; the requisitions, which Chris- tian evidence can be called upon to satisfy, were obscured by the confusion of mathematical and moral proofs ; a large portion of that evidence lost by the exclusive appeal to the intellect ; and finally, the already diminished consciousness of the positive doctrines of Christianity was yet further weakened by the fabric of natural The- ology, formed by this system through the mere omission of what, in the prevailing religious ideas, was peculiarly Christian, and the substitu- tion of proofs from reason for those from Scrip- ture ' ; a skeleton, deprived of the form, and » Twesten, S. 185. CHxVRACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 119 beauty, and life of the once animated being. The ground-work of a bare deism, or naturalism, was thus already laid. To sum up briefly then the internal state of things in Theology, at the moment when the struggle with the united and condensed efforts of unbelief of every age and of every country was about to commence, we find the result to be, an abstract and unpractical system, in which error was mingled with truth, yet these so blended together, that the practicability of a separation was scarcely seen either by the supporters or by the opponents, and the untenable human additions, advanced more prominently and de- fended as equally essential with the divine basis : we find the truths themselves presented in a dry dialectic form, destructive of their life and in- fluence, and no distinction made between the rejec- tion of the received mode of stating and explaining them, and the abandonment of the doctrines thus stated; none between those which are essen- tial to Christianity, and those which, though forming part of its system, would if rejected, disfigure, but not destroy it : and, (which was the foundation of those perversions,) the maintenance of the letter of the whole system, as a sum of credenda, viewed as in itself the object of Reve- lation, without reference to the practical reli- gious value ; the efforts to make them practical re- garded as hypocrisy or fanaticism, and the school, who had begun the undertaking, degenerate ; the real proofs of the truths themselves overwhelmed 120 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST and clioked by a multitude of others, of evident invalidity, yet regarded as altogether essential to the maintenance of those truths ; true science and free inquiry abandoned and opposed ; Scrip- ture scarcely felt to be the basis of religious truth, nor studied in order to discover it, and the right understanding of Scripture itself perplexed by wrong principles and obscured by the neglect of history ; the knowledge of the nature, objects, and influence of Christianity, lost through the want of that best comment upon it, a Christian life, and the defect not even objectively supplied by the study of its past existence. To this condition of Theology, must be added the moral and intellectual circumstances of the age : its moral character was such as might be antici- pated from neglected education, and the defects in Christian teaching and Christian ministry, — frivo- lity, self-gratification, and corrupted morals ^ ; nor was its intellectual character, though more difficult to condense, from the variety of the elements of which it was composed, less adverse to the subsis- tence of Christianity. It is indeed rare, either in individuals or nationally, that a state of strong ex- citement is not accompanied by a diminution of religious feeling ; the absorbing gratification of active mental creation jars the tone of mind essential to the Christian influences ; a feeling of self-confidence and self-satisfaction is generated, unfavourable at least to that deep sense of man's ^ Schlegel, v. 246. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 121 dependence, his insufficiency, and his necessities, which draws him to his God, and his Redeemer. Not the pursuit of science in itself, not the depth of speculation, but the engrossing power which they exert over the unaccustomed mind, (and to such an one only are they thus unhealthy,) interferes with the harmonious and proportionate developement of the intellectual and religious faculties. In the present instance, the impulse appears originally to have been given by the Leibnitz-Wolfian philosophy : this, without great speculative depth, imparted new energy to the German mind, as being the first effort to produce a self-originated and native system of philosophy ; the eminent distinctness, precision, and force, which it in part discovered, in part communicated to, the German language, both rendered that language a fitter instrument for other exertion, and enabled it, (as language always does,) itself to re-act upon the activity of the mind : the study of history was revived and reformed through the views of Thomasius, and the acquaintance with our own literature : a number of highly-gifted minds were roused in every department, and German literature, in many branches at least, sprung with unexampled rapidity from infancy to maturity. Had a religious spirit been already there, this revival might have contributed, like the first and great re-awakening of literature in Europe, to the vindication and purification of the Evangelical belief; in the actual event, it furnishes an additional proof, that however re- 122 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST animated science aided in, it was not a principal source of the Reformation. Like the shower, it may aid the seed to vegetate, but the seed it is not ; the ground being now unprepared, it gave luxuriance to the natural productions, which choked it. The incidental causes which made a suddenly revived, and therefore as yet unsound, study of history especially injurious have been already hinted. It was the unsound part of the Wolfian philosophy also which was injurious. These intellectual defects were again strength- ened by the moral faults of the age. The conceit and absence of moral earnestness, then extensively prevalent, greatly promoted the natural liability of times of newly kindled energy to over-rate all supposed discoveries, and to depreciate indiscrimi- nately every thing which before existed ; to prefer extent to depth of investigation, and to be dazzled consequently by every specious novelty. For a time, at least, every hypothesis opposed to the strictness of the previous system, was assured, among a certain class, of a favourable reception ; and though this disposition had ultimately the collateral advantage, that the truth was more clearly ascertained, through the examination of every imaginable opposed theory, as well as through the modifications which itself occasionally obtained from the persevering sifting of views, at first unpromising, the first result was the introduc- tion into theology of much that was shallow and capricious. The evils however, which occurred must not be entirely ascribed to a prevailing love CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 123 of innovation, being in part attributable to the contrary error of the previous and contemporary orthodox school, which refused altogether to listen to any theory at variance with its own, or the re- sults of whose enquiries was a priori certain. The collision, however, to which the German Theology must, it appeared, be necessarily ex- posed, might perhaps have been still deferred ; the regeneration, by which it was to be restored, have been effected without this great struggle, but for circumstances connected with the reign of Frederic the Second. The extreme popula- rity given by the authority of that monarch to French literature, at that time universally tinged with a flippant unbelief, even in works not pro- fessedly written in mockery of religion ; the re- ception of French unbelievers at his court and as his companions, some of them (such as the wretched La Mettrie and Voltaire,) the most reck- less and unprincipled ; and the countenance given in an admiring nation by his own professed opinions, aided strongly to determine in this direction the existing frivolity. Frederic, when he saw the moral effects of the extended unbe- lief, in vain repented ^ that he had contributed to its propagation. The disposition thus engender- ^ It has been related to the author by one likely to be accu- rately informed, that Frederic shortly before his death, in expres- sing his regret at the altered condition of his dominions in this respect, professed that he would gladly sacrifice his best battle, could they but be restored to the state in belief and in practice in which he had found them. 124 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST ed was fostered by translations of the writings of all the principal deists of our own land. The attack upon Christianity had been carried on more systematically ^ in our own, than in any other, country ; the necessity of a revelation, as well as the validity of the several evidences for its truth had been successively disputed by men, some of whom possessed no ordinary acuteness : the course, which had been here adopted, was eminently calculated, from the similarity of its general character and of its defects, to promote the direction which the German mind was taking; inasmuch as the greater part of the early English unbelievers had been carried into unbelief partly by the same intellectual defects, partly by similar unhappy circumstances in the Church itself. The sunken state of Christianity through the civil wars, and the controversies of embittered * There is scarcely a point in the whole compass of Christia- nity or of Christian evidence which was not, in a regular progres- sion, sifted by the English Deists. Herbert, by substituting a natural theology for revealed doctrine, and by assigning man's natural instinct as the source of his knowledge of truth, the uni- versality of the reception of those truths as the test of their being thus derived, laid a broad foundation for all the theories and criticisms of his successors. The distinctive character of the Christian miracles had been disguised by Blount ; the morality of the Gospel criticised from a false point of view by Shaftes- bury ; the evidence from miracles and prophecy had been sepa- rately, (and therefore, as evidences, unfairly) judged by Woolston and Collins ; the theory of rationalism had been proposed with plausibleness, consistency, and roundness, though without depth, by Tindal. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 125 parties, induced in Lord Herljert of Clierbury, the leader of the EngHsh Deists, the attempt to remedy the unpracticahiess of the existing system, by converting Christianity into a mere scheme of Ethics ; they had led Toland to deny all higher truths of Revelation, and had inclined Hobbes to transform Christianity into a mere instrument of state policy. The similar consequences of the thirty years' war, in which, as in England, Religion was made the watchword, and to whose prolongation the contentions of religious parties had in part contributed, produced among many of the Germans a similar disposition. The con- stant appeal to the rationality of the system of Christianity which led Tindal to conceive of it as a mere *" republication of the Religion of Nature V' was extensively encouraged in Germany by the translation of the works of the earlier English Apologists, and by the partly allied character of the orthodox school. The erroneous conceptions of inspiration and of prophecy, and the conse- quent failure to understand the connection of the two covenants, together with the exclusive ap- ' Tindal himself refers to a passage of Sherlock, in which this expression occurs, as well as the assertion that the laws of Chris- tianity are a ckar exposition of that original religion. Neither Bishop Conybeare nor Foster in their answers (which, however, are the most celebrated which appeared) pressed the necessity of the Christian revelation, but the former contented himself with shewing that it formed an useful addition to the religion of nature through its positive laws, the latter that its system of morality was superior to that naturally discovered. 126 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST peal to the intellect in the proposition of the evi- dences, which had confused to Collins the argument from prophecy, gave a ready access to his criti- cisms when transferred into the German Church. The depth of thought and of moral earnestness accordingly which guided Lord Herbert of Cher- bury > in his search after the source of truth in the human mind, the acuteness of Toland^ and of Hobbes, and the ability evinced in de- tached criticisms by Collins and Morgan ^ ex- ' Much moral as well as intellectual reflection is implied in the confession of Lord Herbert, that the understanding is an insuffi- cient source of knowledge in divine things, as well as by his directing his mind to consciousness, (or as he called it instinct) as the only independent ground of such knowledge. The errors in the application of this truth he shared in common with Jacobi, with whom his general character has much similarity ; yet not- withstanding these errors, he is entitled to a high degree of respect from the earnestness of his religious as well as from his intellectual character. ^ It is remarkable in Toland that he was first carried on by the consecutiveness of his speculations to the only consistent system of unbelief, Pantheism. Locke says of him that but for his love of distinction he would have been a great man ; and Leibnitz, whose annotationes subitaneae ad Tolandi Libruni (1707) are the best of the 50 refutations which appeared against him, praises his acuteness. ^ Morgan put together with greater minuteness than any other the historical critical difficulties, and was much used both by the French and German unbelievers ; (the most of Voltaire's objections, which do not originate in his own unprincipled inven- tions, are derived from Morgan and Tindal.) He manifested also no ordinary acuteness in the doctrinal objections which he ad- duced, while he won through his greater candour ; from Collins whole sections have been transcribed into modern doctrinal works CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 127 erted greater influence, and that upon minds less frivolous or less morbid, than those acted upon by the wit and audacious falsehoods of Voltaire ', or the diseased sensibility of Rousseau. Imitators, but for the most part with few original additions, were stimulated in Germany itself. Transla- tions of our earlier English Apologists opposed to these works did but aggravate the evil, and increase the rationalist tendency ^ ; partly because they had themselves been in some degree tacitly acted upon by the systems which they opposed, partly as being too exclusively intellectual, and lastly, because from the different stage in which German Theology then stood, their very defences contributed to expose some of its untenable, but of Germany ; his work obtained its credit from the previous mis- conceptions of prophecy, as a mere historical description of the future, and the confusion of prophecy and foreteUing therein involved. ^ As unbelief assumed a different character in each of the three nations according to the ruling turn of mind in each, so had each its separate class of readers : the French unbelievers, from the unsystematic character of their minds, and from their recklessness about the establishment of any fixed principles, followed individual objections into a minuter detail, but without reference to any general theory ; they aimed at destroying, without attempting to replace, Christianity ; the English Deists from the predominant practical character of our nation, were generally de- termined in their investigation by what appears to be of moral practical importance ; the German, who, from his more specula- tive character, pursues enquiry for its own sake, followed his system with more consistency whithersoever it led him. 2 This is especially remarked by Twesten, S. 189, 90, and is indeed the view of the most observing niioda of Germany. 6 128 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST iinyielded, points. It will appear scarcely credi- ble to one unacquainted with those times, to what degree these agencies were furthered by a review established by Nicolai. Its object was to recommend every book opposed, not merely to Christianity, but to every earnest character of mind, while it passed over in silence, or held up to scorn, every work which favoured a belief in Revelation \ With little recommendation, ex- cept peculiarities of style, and the favourable disposition of its readers, its dicta were consider- ed as oracles ; and its party succeeded with no better means than their bold claims to the ex- clusive possession of ' sound reason,' and the audacity with which they accordingly decided upon Christianity, to drown any voice raised in op- position, to brand any antagonist as an intolerant enemy of illumination, if not as a Crypto-Catho- lic. This shallowness was promoted by the substitution of the rightly-called *' Popular Phi- losophy," for that of Wolf, through such writers as Garve, Eberhardt, M. Mendelssohn, and Basedow. Incapable of deep or consistent specu- lation, they laid '' sound common sense," (the usual refuge of shallowness, or of deficiency in speculative powers) as the basis of their philo- sophy, and of their criticisms of Christianity ; a superficial empiricism was the ground-work of that mere shadow of Natural Religion, to which they reduced Christianity : and they themselves ^ It commenced in 1768, and grew to 48 4to. Volumes. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 129 scarcely suspected the precariousness of their own arbitrary structure, now that they had undermined the foundation of positive belief, and were consequently astonished at the Spinozism of Lessing, and at Jacobi's vindication of its con- sistency for the mere understanding. A shallow theory of Eudaimonism stood at the head of their system. '' Happiness was the highest destination of man, the end to which it was the purpose of God to lead him ; an intelligent pursuit of happi- ness its morality, and to find one's own happiness in that of others, the most elevated virtue, to which it rose \" Theology, however, declined only gradually, by successive generations, and even at last but par- tially, into this school of unbelief. The form which itself latterly assumed, was not the cause but the result of this collision with unbelief, which its earlier stage had tended by reaction to pro- duce. Not only did the first theologians, who in- cidentally, or by too exclusive or partial a follow- ing up of their systems, gave occasion to the superficializing or the rejection of Christian doc- trine, Baumgarten, Ernesti, and Michaelis, them- selves still firmly adhere to them, but some even * Twesten S. 193, in whose words much of the immediately preceding statement of the external auxihary causes of unbehef is conveyed ; they do not rest, however, on his authority alone, but are in Germany universally regarded as occasionally con- tributing to unbelief; more, however, than the circumstances, which incidentally called into existence what was already formed, they cannot in their own nature be. K 130 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST of their next disciples, as Semler and Morus, did not altogether abandon any fundamental article. The course, in which this declension was com- pleted, was rather such as might have been ex- pected from the previous mere intellectual con- ception of Christianity, the gradual deadening of the ideas peculiarly Christian, the unperceived substitution of mere moral doctrines, which bore more or less analogy to those of Christianity which were now longer understood, and finally the attempt to conciliate Rationalism by bringing down Christianity to its low and carnal standard, than that of direct and intentional opposition. The seed withered because it had no root in the heart. Each theologian attempted and strained to maintain as much of Christianity, as his own gradually altered tone of mind enabled him to understand ; it was the natural and almost neces- sary consequence of a mere objective contempla- tion of Christianity, destitute of the insight afforded by personal experience, that the objects themselves should become gradually more and more faint and indistinct, until they at length faded from the sight, or were mingled, in the in- creasing dimness, with others to which, viewed from that distance, they bore more or less simi- larity. It has often been the case, not in nations merely but in individuals, where early Christian education has not been further developed by active religion, that Christian doctrines have first lost their freshness and vividness, and that finally, though habit has retained the same names, im- 6 CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 131 paired religious perception has substituted far other and far lower meaning than that which they once possessed, when they were felt as well as acknowledged. If under ordinary circumstances they often continue apparently the same, the con- tact with unbelievers, or the mistaken attempt to recommend Christianity from a partial and com- promising point of view, invariably discovers, as it often promotes, the half-conscious deviation. Of the first Theologians who prepared for the new system, Baumgarten, who was a real Christian, though gradually chilled by the exclu- sive love of the mere scientific element of Theo- logy, was chiefly influential by the introduction of English Theology of a freer, but very negative and superficial character ; by the promotion of the study of history through the translation of English works ; and by accustoming his disciples to de- part from the traditional method, through the application of the form of the Wolfian system to the different branches of Theology. By this last innovation, especially, the Scriptural fresh- ness, which Doctrinal Theology and Scriptural Interpretation had recovered in the school of the Pietists, was in that same school in a different mode destroyed. The tabular method, the dia- lectic precision, the abstract language, which he employed, humanized and straitened the divine truth ; the fulness of the Christian ideas admits not of being compressed into narrow logical formulae ; the free and living spirit, which ani- mated its language, evaporated in the minute K 2 132 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST dissection of this dialectic anatomy. Many of Baumgarten's disciples ^ were led by this method to a mere cold intellectual conception of Christia- nity; and Semler, whose naturally ardent mind was capable of deeper impressions, inherited from his teacher only the views of reform, which Baumgarten recommended as necessary ^ but felt himself too old to execute, and which Semler, from the inaccurate and unsystematic character of his mind, ill, because imperfectly and partially, developed. Equally faithful to the sum of Chris- tian doctrine remained Ernesti, even in his later years, when it had already been pared down by theologians to a mere *' republication of the Re- ligion of Nature." In him, however, the evil effects of a mere external conception of Christia- nity were yet more apparent. His revival of the " grammatical," as opposed to the doctrinal, in- terpretation of Scripture, was indeed a great and very beneficial change ; a change for which the * Besides Semler, many of the principal innovators, as BUsch- ing. Teller, Spalding, Eberhardt, Steinbart, &c. had been pupils of Baumgarten. (Niemeyer, d. Univ. Halle, S. 104.) The in- fluence of Baumgarten was greater probably than that of any other individual ; almost all the theological students of Halle, (never fewer than between 5 and 600, and often more,) attended his lectures ; the attachment to the letter of his lectures was so great, that they were not only at the time transcribed by most of his pupils verbatim, but weie published after his death with diplo- matic accuracy, different MSS. being collated and even minute variantes noted, according to the several years of the delivery of the lectures. Even Baumgarten's bodily defects were imitated. (Niemeyer Ebend. S. 77, 81.) ' Semler Lebensbeschr. ap. Niemeyer, S. 104. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 133 German Church must long be grateful to him, in that it has restored the principle of the Reforma- tion, that not human system, but the clear word of God in the Scripture, is the basis and norm of faith. Too exclusively intent, however, on the introduction of the classical rules of inter- pretation, he slighted the historical element : and destitute of the key which would have opened to him the fuller riches of Scripture, he forgot that every new religion must form to itself a new language, that in order to convey new truths, words already in use must indeed be employed to connect them with the previous ideas of man- kind, but that the signification of these words must be modified, that they must be re-cast, re-moulded, in order to receive the stamp of the newly communicated truth. The appli- cation of classical language in its full strictness to the records of Christianity, could but convert them ii'ito a document of mere human speculation. That \6yog signified " reason," and " wisdom" in the classics, was a very superficial, as well as an entirely mistaken, ground for supposing that in St. John it meant nothing more than the wisdom of the communication made to man. The effect of this mistake is seen in its full perniciousness in his immediate followers '. " Re- generation" was supposed to signify " the mere reception into a religious society ;" the doctrine ' E. g. Fischer (who was indeed no theologian, but did in- fluence theology) Proluss. de Vitiis Lexicon N.T., Schleusner, &c. 134i CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST of the influences of the Holy Spirit became, more or less, a certain attaining of praiseworthy qualities with the (often merely external) assist- ance of God ; the tv uvai with the Father, an unity of disposition or of will. A similar failing, arising from the same source, is manifest in Ernesti's mode of vindicating re- ceived doctrine. Thus in claiming inspiration for the books of the Old Testament, he even admits the supposition, that they may not be calculated for all mankind, that they did not tend to the improvement of the human heart. He acknowledged their temporary value for the Jews, but did not feel their direct importance for Christians*. In the school of experience of Luther, he would have learnt the analogy of dif- ferent parts of the life of most Christians to the two different stages of the Law and the Gospel ; he would have felt the necessity of the law, even now, as a state of preparatory discipline to bring us to Christ. The adherence of Michaelis to the established system, and his respect for religion is probably mainly to be attributed to the impressions made by the intercourse of the Pietists, among whom he was educated by his father, the excellent J. H. Michaelis. Too light-minded, as himself says, to adopt their tone of pious feeling, he yet re- tained an external conviction of the truth of ■ Neuester Theol. Bibliothek, B. 2. S. 440. fg. in his critique upon Semler's " Enquiries on the Canon of the Old Testament." CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 135 Christianity, endeavoured to remove objections by new theories, and much to the surprise of his younger contemporaries, held to the last many parts of the older system, which had been modi- fied or laid aside. Throughout are the pernicious consequences of his mere outward persuasion manifest. Destitute of that conviction, which can alone give a comprehensive insight into the real character of Revelation, and the harmo- nious relation of its several parts, he had no guide which might enable him to perceive what might be safely admitted, without detriment to the system itself; he consequently, according to the usual error of persons taking only a partial view, frequently opposed the objection, instead of the principle, upon which the objection was founded ; endeavoured to remove it by theories in conformity with mere human systems, and strengthened it equally by his concessions, and by his own inadequate and arbitrary defences ^ ^ There is no work probably of Micliaelis, at all toucliing upon religious subjects, to which these observations do not apply ; " the Commentaries on the Laws of Moses," and " the Notes on the Old Testament," are full of these perverted applications of mere civil, often of modern, principles, unfounded theories and low views ; his translation of the Bible indicates his common-place conceptions of Scripture : his " History of the Resurrection" evidences occasionally both his wrong principles of defence, and a readiness, which he seems to have deemed praiseworthy, to abandon his previous belief, in case it should be found to be false ; his commentary on " the three most important Psalms concern- ing Christ" is a specimen of his failure, from want of enlarged views, to see the right principles of exposition, and the arbitrary 136 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST To a mind possessed of no enlarged principles, every minute difficulty obtained an intrinsic and perplexing force ; his belief was a reed, ready to be shaken by every fresh breeze ; all which had been previously won, seemed again staked upon the issue of each petty skirmish, and in the very descriptive comparison of Lessing on this sort of combatants, he was like the timid soldier who loses his life before an outpost, without once seeing the country of which he would gain possession \ The theories and unsound criticisms to which he was consequently driven, &c. Deep insight into religion were indeed inconsistent with the intemperate habits and low moral character of Michaelis, which defiled his books occasionally, and still more frequently his lectures, with obscenity. It is a very characteristic trait of Michaelis's mind, that he himself records his having asked his father on his death-bed, which of the Lexica of Castelli he thought the best. (Pref. to Mich. Syr. Chrestomathie.) One may very consistently acknowledge the service, which Michaelis, and even Paulus, has rendered, by contributing to place the histo- rical circumstances of Scriptural narration more before our eyes, to put us more in the situation of contemporaries, and to render the mode of conception less abstract, and yet esteem the manner in which they have done it pernicious, and derogatory to Scripture. ' Such, according to Lessing, was the conduct of theologians ; the Christian he compares with the bold conqueror who, neglecting the fortresses on the frontier, at once takes possession of the land. " Never," he says, " will any one arrive at a belief in the Christian Revelation who thinks he must first clear up this or that doctrinal or historical minutia, before he accepts the substance ; rather will he only ever accept all the several historical truths, who has first gained possession of the inward holy truth, and not the de- tails." In this he was preceded by our great Bacon, who com- pares such defenders or enquirers to one, who, in order to light up CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 137 disadvantages, however, to which he thus exposed the defence of Christianity, were the least evils of the system ; far more resulted from the common- place views of the persons, actions, institutions, and doctrines of Scripture, to which it gave rise : not only the theories of Eichhorn, (his pupil) ^ con- structed on the assumed human origin of every phsenomenon in revealed religion, but even the low and vulgar tone of mind, in which Paulus de- graded every thing spiritual and divine in the Gospels to the sphere of civil every-day life, the mean and earthly principles which he attributes to its actors, (by which far more injury has been produced than by the soon exploded and now almost forgotten explanations of the miracles,) seem but the natural and inevitable consequence of this exclusion of religion from the theories of Michaelis. Theology, thus already on the decline, natu- rally sunk still further, though in very different degrees, in the next generation ; in Semler, the pupil of Baumgarten and of Ernesti ; in Morus, the inheritor of Ernesti's principles ; and in a large hall, were to place a light in every corner, instead of one great central light, which should illumine every the most distant part. ^ The pursuit of novelty, to the comparative disregard of truth, which was the besetting temptation of this original and elegant, but ill-regulated mind, revenged itself upon him ; more fertile in new theories than any of his contemporaries, he survived to see the last extorted from him. His errors, however, must not be set to the account of German Theology, since he was a philoso- phical, not u theological, Professor, 138 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST Eichliorn and Koppe, the disciples of Micliaelis. Of these Morus and Koppe superficialized still further the Christian ideas ; Morus especially, devoid of any settled principles, though in his Epitome of Christian Doctrine he opposed none of the Christian doctrines, led the way to their subsequent rejection, by his representations of the uncertainty of the conflicting views; yet more perhaps by the arbitrary principle, which this hesitation caused him to propose in his doctrinal lectures, that so much only should be retained as tended to moral improvement. What was described to be thus uncertain, his dis- ciples, naturally very inadequate judges of what was really practical, of course laid aside. Not only however was there in these men no direct opposition, but the influence even of Semler, the most direct founder of the innovating school, lay more in the principles which he introduced, and in his own intellectual defects, than in any direct rejection of fundamental doctrines. The piety of his early days accompanied him in some measure through life, and became in his later years still more decided. His intellectual character was a singular combination of great advantages and great defects. On the one hand he possessed amazing retentiveness of memory, and very con- siderable acuteness : on the other he was entirely devoid of all philosophical talent, all power of ex- tensive survey, of clear perception, and of accu- rate reasoning. His extensive reading supplied consequently only a mass of facts and ideas, which CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 139 floated indistinctly before him ; his acuteness sug- gested continually a number of minuter combina- tions, which his mind was not sufficiently syste- matic to correct or limit by reference to the whole subject to which they related, or to perceive the consequences to which they led. When in his latter days he saw how his principles had been developed by others, he repented that he had gone so far \ Against the Wolfenbiittel Fragments he wrote with earnestness ; he opposed conscien- tiously, and prevented the appointment of Bahrdt as Professor at Halle : he preserved himself (how- ever difficult the mode may be to understand) from the results of his own scientific investigation, by what he called his ** private religion," (the re- ligion apparently of feeling, whose separate and independent validity he wished to establish); and some of his theories, which have been most exten- sively abused, seem to have owed their character to the indefiniteness and obscurity with which he conveyed them. In his treatises on daemoniac possessions ^ there was nothing in any wise dero- ^ Niemeyer, Semler's letzte'Ausserungen liber religiose Gegen- stande, S. 9. He thought, however, that in an age which had been more adapted to the reception of these views, they could have been developed without injury. ^ Semler came upon this subject not in the way of mere specu- lation, but to remove an injurious superstition, through which an hysterical person had been treated by a clergyman of high office near Wittenberg as actually possessed. Semler's first treatise went no further than to disprove present possessions, admitting the moral influence of evil spirits; his subsequent essay propos- ed only to prove that iaifJLoi'L'Cv^itvoi need not, any more than 140 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST gatory to the Evangelists, much less any thing im- plying any ' accommodation' in Christ ; yet his undistinguishing contemporaries pronounced the opinion to be irreconcileable with faith and piety, or proceeded ^ to deny the existence of any agent of evil superior to man. The indiscriminate stiff- ness of the preceding age yet survived sufficiently to perpetuate the reaction which it had caused ; and a shallow generation, accustomed by the still continued mode of handling the subjects of Theo- logy, to regard them as mere theoretical pro- blems, seems to have thought, that the only mode of recovering liberty was to depart as widely as possible from the system which had fettered them. Every hint was eagerly seized, and under the pro- tection of a certain correspondence with the views of those whose only aim was to attain that free- dom of enquiry^, which is an essential principle of cai/jiopdr, &c, in classic Greek, signify more than a " raging phrenzy," while he allowed that some narrations implied a stronger external or internal agency of the evil principle. Yet these treatises produced such works as the " Disquisitio an Adeemo- nismus cum Jide et pietate Christiana conciliari possit," Tiib. 1763. The subject occupied subsequently, very unprofitably and unpractically, but to a wide extent, the German pulpit. ^ E. g. Teller's Worterbuch. ^ A good view of the previous stiffness of the German Theo- logy may be collected from the second part of Semler's Autobio- graphy, in which he describes the progress of the developement of his own views, S. 121. fgg. We find then, in the province of Biblical Criticism, not only the letter, but the very variantes, (Kri, Chethibh,) of the text of the Old Testament supposed to be inspired, and this immutability of the text to be indispensable to CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 141 Protestantism, others found admission, who dif- fered from them in their first principles, as well the truth of Christianity ; bolder critics, as Simonis and Le Clerc, accounted among evil-intentioned antiscripturarii ; (S. 121-3.) the divine origin of the Hebrew points and accents maintained ; the possibility of errors of transcription rejected ; the Hebrew text considered as the norm of all versions, (S. 123.) yet the fable of Aristeas still retained; (S. 128.) the imaginary pre-eminent sanctity of the Hebrew language, and other inven- tions of the Rabbins, inherited ; any innovation regarded as a petulant opposition to the agreement of the universal Church. (S. 130-2.) Every merely historical book of the Old Testament, as Ruth and Esther was further considered equally indispensable and essential to the beneficial reception of Christianity with those of the New Testament, and the discovery of Christ in all the books of the Old Testament to be a truth essential to religion, the basis of all interpretation, and the criterion of its soundness. (S. 135 — 144.) The perfect purity of the Greek of the New Testament was vindicated ; (S. 126.) the relative value of its documents, which Luther, as well as the early Church, had acknowledged, was oblite- rated, and inspiration regarded as a mere mechanical act. (S. 161.) In Ecclesiastical History, the principles on which it had been cultivated in the Romish Church were still perpetuated ; there prevailed an indiscriminate panegyric of the early orthodox, a severe condemnation of all the heretics of the first five centuries, without an historical acquaintance with either; it was yet full of exaggerated accounts of the early persecutions and martyrs : and (here equally as in the case of Gibbon) the indiscriminate ad- mission of the later miraculous legends, and among these even of the least credible class, those by which the orthodoxy of one of conflicting speculations was to be established, endangered the reception of the miracles of the first introduction of Christianity. The whole study was confined for the most part to what related to the external society. (S. 154 — 161.) Symbolical, as well as doctrinal, theology, needed also extensive simplification, though the limits of a note will not allow even a condensed exhibition of this portion of the subject. 142 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST as in their object, but were included in the same category by the adherents of the traditional scheme. Science, unnaturally separated from Theology, whose end should be a scientific statement of divine truth, became its foe. It was from this cause alone, that the revival of historical interpretation by Semler became the most extensive instrument of the degradation of Christianity. The princi- ple, that an historical religion cannot be under- stood without the history of the era of its intro- duction, that no writing can be fully understood without a knowledge of other contemporary writ- ings, which fully develope the ideas, to which it- self occasionally alludes, which it modifies or cor- rects, nor without a clear view, whether collected from itself or from exterior sources, of the persons with reference to whom it was originally written, and the circumstances which immediately occa- sions it, is so obviously correct, that in this coun- try, where the circle of expounding Scripture by the system which has been founded upon it, has never been systematically adopted, the contest about the " Historical Interpretation " must be matter of surprise, and, until explained by pre- vious circumstances, of perplexity. The princi- ple had already in part been developed by Baum- garten: the unsystematic and unclear mind of his disciple saw neither the limits, by w^hich it must in its own nature be circumscribed, nor the other principles by which it must be conditioned. The fundamental errors of Semler's application of it are the same which have already been noticed in CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 143 Ernesti ; the same exclusive adherence to his single principle, the same failure to perceive the connection ^ of the Christian with the Jewish reve- lation, as the completion of this earlier education of mankind, the same inability to discriminate between what was principally intended for con- temporaries, and what is directly also of eternal value ; they were derived in part from the same source, the want of that deeper insight into the nature of the religion, which a constantly improv- ing personal Christianity alone can give. Such ^ This connection of the two dispensations had been in great measure obhterated by the Orthodox system, partly from over- looking the gradual character of Revelation, and finding every thing already fully revealed under the preparatory covenant, partly from the neglect of the historical interpretation : the study of the Apocryphal books, or of Philo, which supply a necessary link in the chain, by shewing how revealed truth had, during the tem- porary cessation of any new discoveries, been developed by hu- man reflection in conformity to the earlier Scriptures, had been altogether neglected ; the revelation in the New Testament had consequently become insulated and abstract ; and Semler's prin- ciple, that " Revelation must consist of purely unknown truths," " that it was unworthy of it to say anew what had been already said," was a natural consequence of this system. It was this dogma, however, which most injured Semler's great principle of historical interpretation. It followed from this theit Revelation could not be merely confirmatory, that whatever in it did agree with what previously existed, v/as mere t,vyKaTd[DaaiQ ; that what- ever had been previously taught by the Pharisees, (though in fact indirectly derived from the earlier revelation,) could form no part of the later communication. On the same principles, however, even the meagre portion, yet left, of that scheme of truth, which was destined to regenerate mankind, must be still further re- duced. 144 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST inexperience alone could convert the everlasting contrast of adp'^ and Trv^vna into the mere tempo- rary contrast of the Judaizing and narrowing con- ception of Christianity, with the freer views which St. Paul taught ; have divided consequently the books of the New Testament into those in which the aap^, and those in which the Trvtv^a, predomi- nated, or have conceived that the sole object of the Epistle to the Romans, was to oppose the par- ticularism of the Jews, and to prove that the hea- then also might attain eternal life. The theory of accommodation was an unavoidable conse- quence of this perverted form of historical inter- pretation. Still more injurious would the same system obviously be to the right understanding of the Old Testament, while the inducement to apply it was increased, by the inability of Semler to com- prehend an extensive scheme, and by the greater faultiness of the system, which he could not but oppose. The confusion, further, which the ortho- dox system of Doctrinal Theology had introduced between essentials and non-essentials, biblical truth, and human developement or mode of state- ment, and the want in Semler himself of the deep Christian knowledge, and clearness of thought, which would have enabled him to unravel it, ren- dered his vast study of Christian doctrine in its earlier forms an inextricable labyrinth, a mere source of perplexity and uncertainty. The mind, long accustomed to derive its Christian knowledge from the mechanical study of the letter of a con- fined form, had lost the clue, which would have CHARACTLR OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 145 enabled it to trace in this variety of statements, and in what, to a superficial mind, appeared to be contradictions, the unity of the same spirit mani- festing itself in various forms, according to the character of the individuals through whom it was conveyed. The former school had found in the Bible itself all the subsequent developements, which later speculation on its truths had s\ibse- quently, often indeed rightly and consistently, evolved : a superficial age, dazzled with the sud- denness of the discovery, that parts of the re- ceived system were by time alone thus developed, and convinced only of the untenableness of that system, employed itself in remarking and accu- mulating the apparent differences : the higher unity in which much of this discordance would have harmonized, lay beyond their sphere. Doc- trinal Theology assumed consequently in this school a critical and negative, rather than a posi- tive, character : the sum of doctrine, considered as certainly fixed, gradually diminished, the deve- lopement of the connection even of the general truths of Religion became less frequent, and in the energetic description of the often-quoted au- thor, who has, with the deepest insight, and soundest judgment, traced the whole course of doctrinal Theology, " they cleared with great exertions the site of the overthrown palace from the encumbering heap of ruins ; they dug deep trenches to bring better materials to light ; but as if their strength were exhausted with these efforts, they left it to each individual to put toge- 146 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST ther a petty hut for his own use, if he should find the foundations still safe, and the materials ade- quate to the purpose ; or, if they undertook the trouble for him, it was but a temporary construc- tion, which, in its turn, was again to be laid in heaps \" Against these principles and this con- duct of Semler, (which, it must again be repeat- ed, arose from no indisposition to the doctrines ^ but originated in his sense of the necessities of Theology, and were perverted only by the indis- tinctness of his views) little opposition seems to have been made, (at least none is recorded,) though they led to the ultimate temporalizing and annihi- lation of every thing peculiarly Christian in the system ; while long-enduring contests were excited by his partial deviation from the received opinion on daemoniacs, or from his doubts with regard to some few of the least important biblical books, ^ Twesten's Dogmatik, S. 244. ' That part of Seinler's autobiography, which relates to his views in doctrinal Theology, (2 Th. S. 220, fgg.) indicates great earnestness of mind, and a practical object ; and leaves, in com- mon with every other part of this interesting piece of self-observa- tion, a very favourable impression of his piety and conscientious- ness. A misinterpretation of the word * liberalis,' in Semler's Apparatus ad liberalem N. T. interpretationem, has given rise to misconceptions of his character in several English authors, and especially the late valuable Conybeare; (Bampton Lectures.) Semler did not hereby mean that false spirit which casts aside, under pretence of liberality, what from its own altered character it no longer values, but he wished to characterize his own theory, founded solely on the results of historical investigation, and free and independent of the previously established doctrinal system. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 147 with regard to which, in the early Church, free scope had been permitted to difference of opinion. The orthodox school guarded with vigilance the number of the repositories of their treasures, but were unable to detect the substitution by which these treasures were deprived of their value. It is also remarkable, (as far as may be inferred from the yet very imperfect and inadequate history of the times,) that the opponents of succeeding aberrations were, with a few splendid exceptions, princijDally the practical clergy. These, in whom their difficult practical duties perpetuated the sense that something more was necessary than doctrinal speculation or a religion of nature, and thus kept alive the spirit of piety awakened by Spener, remained doubtless, to a very wide extent, unaffected by the contagion around them. Scriptural doctrine having thus been converted into speculation by one party, superficialized by another, and treated as uncertain and vague by a third, there remained but one more declension, to which, under the then circumstances, all these systems tended, the final amalgamation namely of Christianity with the more earnest of the systems by which it was opposed, but to which it had been gradually approaching. What was left of Chris- tianity was too little substantial to present any obstacle to this now natural union ; nor is there any reason to doubt the assertion of the author ' of ' Steinbart Philosophische Unteihaltungen zur weitern Auf- klarungder Gluckseligkeitslehre Heft. 3. 1786. l2 • 148 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST this last measure, that his object was to lead the sceptics of his time to the acceptance of Christi- anity. One of the most pious of his opponents ^ regarded his enterprize as a sincere, though un- happy, attempt to conciliate such of his contem- poraries as felt the necessity of religion, but either knew not, or doubted, pure Christianity. The character of Steinbart seems to have been deter- mined partly by a too ascetic early education, partly by the habit of a mere intellectual and subtle consideration of Christian truth, which was engendered by the study of the over-refining me- thod of Baumgarten ^. The two elements of re- ligious-scientific knowledge were in him never combined. The perusal of Voltaire, which at first produced pain and disquiet, gained a gradually increased influence over his exclusively intellec- tual conviction ; and while his early education preserved in him a regard to virtue with a gene- ral reverence towards God, and the study of the apologetic works of Locke and Foster infused a respect towards Christ, the perception of the errors, which the reference to experience alone, as the sole source of Christian knowledge, had occasioned in his pietistic teachers, fostered in him the far more dangerous tendency altogether to neglect it. His system consequently, though sincere, was miserably shallow. As happiness in ' The excellent Lavater in Pfcnniiigcr's Christl. Magazin. ^ See the account of Steinbart in Schlctrel. B. 6. S. 523. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 149 his view is the only object proposed to man, so are human passions the only impediment ; and the sum of the benefits conferred through Christianity is, that it promotes that happiness by awakening the reflection of mankind to their real and com- mon good, and by the removal of the idea of arbi- trary requisitions on the part of God, which im- pede the right working of reason, and perplex the natural conscience ; that it contains a perfect sys- tem of moral ; strengthens through its authority the natural suggestions of reason by the knowledge of the superintendance of God, by the hope of future rewards, and by the employment of prayer ; gives an insight into the predominance of present good, and an anticipation of unbounded progress in various perfection. All deeper views of the holiness of God, of the spiritual degeneracy and spiritual capabilities of man, and of the means by which the lost energy may be restored, every thing in Christianity peculiarly Christian, and even the more earnest aspirations of the natural man, are wanting : " The system of pure philoso- phy, or Christian doctrine of happiness'" was nei- ther philosophy nor Christianity, but served, after having been much disputed, to reconcile them in the degraded state in which they then existed -. } See the abstract of the above-mentioned work, ap. Schlegcl, S. 527, %g. . ^ Lessing, as he was throughout opposed to the shallowness of the popular philosophy, speaks also strongly against this unnerv- ing of Christianity, with a view to render it acceptable. " For- merly," says he, " a wall of partition was drawn between Theo- 150 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST The two most distinguished of his opponents, Seiler and Sixt, Steinbart maintains, differ only in words from himself ^ The work was now completed ; and until a more earnest spirit should re-awaken the suscep- tibility for, and the need of pure Christianity, the gradations of the several classes mattered but little ; whether, as Nosselt and others, they de- prived the doctrines of Christianity of their high and efficacious import, or Socinianized them with Teller and Spalding ^ or rationalized them with logy and Philosophy, behind which each might hold on its own course. What is done now ? They break the wall down ; and, under the pretence of making us rational Christians, make us irrational philosophers." Lessing compares further the theolo- gians of this class to the master of a house, who, while he reviles the thief, himself throws his goods out of window, so that he has only to fetch them. ^ In his " Philosophische Unterhaltungen," Heft. 1, ap. Schle- gel, S. 545. ^ Both Teller and Spalding belonged to a secret institute, (of which Mendelssoln, Nicolai, and other adherents of the popular philosophy, were also members), whose object was to re-model religion, and alter the form of government. Both, however, saw the necessity of proceeding slowly, and wisely confined themselves to the unnerving Christianity, by substituting common-place moral notions for its energetic doctrines, declaring these to be of importance only to the Theologian, or polemizing against them under the title of the oriental idioms of the New Testament. Thus unnerved, it would collapse at once, or at least offer no resistance. Thus they exchanged the doctrine of the influences of the Holy Spirit for the moral endeavours after improvement with the ex- ternal assistance of God : for " regeneration" was adopted " re- solution to lead a new life ;" for " sanctification," " moral im- provement ;" for being " actuated by the Holy Spirit," " to live CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 151 the followers of Steinbart : nor can that mode of dismissing the evidences of prophecy and mira- cles, which, without expressing any unbelief in them, considered them as valid only for former times, well be considered as any additional step. It was but casting away the shell when the seed of future fruit was already gone. Buttresses, massive as these, were needed to aid in the sup- port of the important fabric, as it once had stood, but to what avail to leave them when this was shrivelled up and dissolved ? The object of this Essay, which is but to hint the probable efficient causes of the temporary re- ception of rationalism into German theology, and the points of its gradual declension, not to give a view of that theology generally, has necessarily produced an almost exclusive attention to the dark side of the picture. Yet it would be an un- just and untrue representation, if it were not dis- tinctly stated, that this outline is intended to convey only the predominant character of the age, that many at all times were found, in whom the struggle of contending opinions produced al- ready its ultimate destination, — that of separating evangelical truth from scholastic systems, and of in conformity to reason." Spalding had most influence through his essay on the Utility of the Preacher's Office ; Teller, through his Lexicon to the New Testament, of which six editions were circulated. These, however, were among the rarer instances of practical clergy, who actively engaged in the promotion of the new system, as they are among those of men, who were actuated by impure, not merely by shallow, views. 152 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST grounding it upon a firmer basis ; who, though they could not dispel the gathering darkness, still sent forth even beyond the comparatively narrow sphere, which they directly illumined, the beacon- light of truth, and were instrumental in transmit- ting the sacred torch to an age where it could shine more freely, and more unimpeded. It would be unfair moreover to omit the mention of such men as Klopstock and Claudius, who, though not theologians, exerted an extensively beneficial influ- ence upon their own and succeeding times ; Klop- stock, yet more by the Christian piety of his Reli- gious Odes, than by his far famed epic ; Claudius, by a very rare and happy union of distinguished talents and rich imagination, a genuine, though not deeply speculative, philosophical spirit, with the purest simplicity of mind, and a depth of Christian feeling and piety, which communicated its own chastened holiness and practical character to every subject which it treated. " Out of the fullness of the heart the mouth spoke," and there- fore spoke naturally and to the heart. This Chris- tian piety shed throughout an unobtrusive light, which was often principally perceived in the rich- ness, and life, and truth, which it gave to the objects more immediately prominent. Nor is the love, with which the works of tiiis genuine Ger- man author have been ever since cherished by his nation, a slight proof of the Christian disposi- tion existing. It does not belong to a brief sketch to give a detailed account of all the individuals who were CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 153 borne along by, and swelled the tide of innova- tion. None of these later followers contributed any original views ; the torpid influences of the popular philosophy, the proud and self-compla- cent satisfaction in the triumph which they were gaining, the increasing efficacy of French lite- rature in the extension of the reigning French frivolity, indisposed to any deeper inquiries, which might endanger their tranquil possession of the exclusive claim to " sound reason." A system which originated in the mere negation of what preceded, in a mere abstraction of its deeper thoughts, could not in itself produce any thing positive. This hollow composition between rea- son and belief stifled for a time the longings of nature, which a more consistent and uncompro- mising system never fails again to recall ; the emptiest and most timid schemes of luibelief are ever the most dangerous to Christianity ; they are palliatives, which while they deaden the mind, and cast over it a paralyzing torpor, conceal the extent of the disease, and suspend the deeply- implanted wish for its real removal. The first new energy was consequently given by one far more opposed to the popular philosophy than to an historical revelation. A minute account then of the innovating theologians would present only a series of modifications of the leading classes, dif- fering in the degree in which they unnerved Christianity, or as to the portions of it, which they admitted into their religion of reason, but agree- ing in their general princij)lcs ; and the survey. 154 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST though necessary in a history, which would repre- sent the state of German Theology during this period, and appreciate the extent of the existing evils, would in the present case, where the object is merely to trace the outline of the general course, only serve to distract the mind by advert- ence to subordinate points. Still less is it neces- sary to mention the different critical investiga- tions with regard to the authenticity of several of the books of Scripture: these furnish but rarely, or at most only incidentally, any indication of the dispositions of the enquirers. The faith of the Christian depends not upon the reception of the one or the other book of Scripture ; and it has been a supposition pregnant with mischief, that any doubt respecting an individual portion of the sacred volume necessarily implies a diminished value for its whole contents, or a weakened reverence and gratitude towards its divine Giver. The enqui- ries in Germany, though occasionally carried on upon wrong principles, seem generally to have had truth for their object, have contributed to the firmer and better-grounded establishment of seve- ral books, and to the better classification of all ; and one instance at least, the anxiety evinced by practical as well as scientific Theologians to vin- dicate to its author what all Christianity has de- signated as * the evangelical, the spiritual Gospel,' implies no slight interest in the truths which it pre-eminently contains \ ' Within a short time after Bretschneider's collection of objec- CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 155 Two men, however, must be mentioned, belong- ing to this age, to whom much attention must be given in any view of the course of the final de- velopement of this crisis ; who, (though the one seems to have remained embarrassed to the last by the perplexing conflict of the different systems in Theology and Philosophy, the other, though he defended Christianity, knew it not in its depth, and defended it consequently on wrong princi- ples,) both contributed to its re-establishment, and both contain, at least in the germ, many of the ideas, whose subsequent expansion and scientific justification has led to a correcter conception, a readier admission, and a deeper foundation, of its truths : — Lessing and Herder. It is difficult to appreciate how far Lessing stood within Christi- anity : how far his high value for it went beyond an objective esteem for its contents : how far his conception of "its internal holy truth" enabled him to overcome his historical and doctrinal diffi- culties and his inclination to Pantheism, and to tionsor difficulties relating to the genuineness of St, John's Gos- pel appeared, no less than fourteen answers were published ; and the point is now established to the satisfaction of Bretschneider himself, in common with the rest of Germany ; it would, however, be very unjustifiable to ascribe to Bretschneider any other motive than that which he assigns in his original work, the wish to bring the question to an issue : where doubts have acquired a genera] prevalence, it is an unquestionable service to collect those doubts as strongly as they are capable of being put ; the only result of the desultory answers with which, till this is done, vindicators often content themselves, is to produce an unjustified and uncon- vinced conviction. 156 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST appropriate it to himself independently of its his- torical basis. A too predominant indulgence of the taste for elegant literature and the arts, in ■which he was so great a master, seem to have enervated in him the moral earnestness, and pre- cluded him from the self-knowledge, necessary for a thorough and satisfactory examination ; and though he perhaps rightly preferred Pantheism to the then existing systems, he had neither bold- ness to take the " saltum mortalem/' by which Jacobi escaped it, nor a philosophy sufficiently deep to see the deficiencies of Pantheism itself *. The contentions of his times increased to him the difficulty of perceiving what formed the substance of Christianity itself. Yet whatever place he may himself have occupied, he rendered considerable services to Christianity. Some of these have al- ready been occasionally mentioned; it might suffice to add that he restored the key to the right under- standing of the Old Testament, as the preliminary education - of the human race, and removed the su- perficial objections against the particularism of the earlier revelation, and the omission of a future state; and which was yet more important, the change which he mainly produced in the too abstract sys- ^ In his essay iiber die Natiirliche Religion he explains Chris- tianity by means of Pantheism. * In his concise but deep and much-containing essay, " iiber die Erziehung des Menschengeschlechts." A Christian would indeed defend some things differently, and the Pantheistic scheme lies as the basis ; it has, however, much that is valuable. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 157 terns of evidence of the then Apologists, and his re- ferring to the Bible itself as its own best, or, as he held, its only, advocate \ He further, in oppo- sition to a presumptuous philosophy, pointed out the limits of the empire of reason, by admitting, that though reason must decide whether a given system be a revelation or no, yet if it find in that revelation things which it cannot explain, this should rather determine it for it than against it. Lessing, however, though he exerted a consider- able influence upon Theology, came only inciden- tally in contact with it ; the dryness, with which it was cultivated at Leipzig, whither he was in his youth sent to study, seems to have deterred him from making it a professional pursuit. The ser- vices also which he rendered were, it seems, rather external to Christianity, in preparing the way for a higher order of Christian apologetic authors, than any direct illustrations of its truths. Herder, on the other hand, though, from the predominance of imagination in his mental character, his own views were rather dim and distant conceptions, than any full realizations of the truths which flashed across, rather than dwelt upon his mind, promoted variously their subsequent reception ; the natural simplicity and deep feeling of his mind enabled him, partially at least, to under- stand much of the deeper contents of the Chris- ^ The only book, says Lessing often in his controversy with Gcize, which is, properly speaking, written in behalf of the truth of the Bible, or which can be written for it, is the Bible itself. 158 CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST tian documents, which the satisfied self-sufficiency of his contemporaries had pronounced to be the mere temporary disguise of the eternal truths of reason : through his genuine oriental spirit he was enabled to penetrate and to shew the fuller mean- ing of much in the Old Testament, which their partial and unhistorical rationalism had neglected or despised, as mythos or unmeaning exaggera- tion. The entire insight which Christian experi- ence would have given, was indeed here also wanting ; his early education by one of a repul- sive, gloomy, and austere spirit, had alienated his mind, of which feeling and imagination were the chief characteristics, from the more earnest con- templation of Christianity ; his natural character, strengthened by this alienation and by his devotion to classical literature and the belles-lettres, led him to view it chiefly on its sesthetik-moral side, to defend it from its loveliness rather than as the only way to holiness. Still, amid this generally mistaken direction of his endeavours, a suscepti- ble mind, as Herder's, could not but frequently be penetrated with a deeper consciousness ; and ac- cordingly, not merely in his earlier works \ before the love of reputation made him imperceptibly enter into a compromise with the spirit of his times, is there much useful, many a sentiment full * Such are especially die alteste Urkunde des Menschen- geschlechts ; die Briefe das Studium der Theologie betreffend ; die Anmerkungen zum N. T. aus einer neueroiFneten morgenlan- discher Quelle. CHARACTER OF THEOLOGY IN GERMANY. 159 of Christian meaning, and much correct concep- tion, but even in his later writings, where every thing seems to float in a dim mist, so that a con- temporary ^ compared them to a distant cloud, of which one could not distinguish whether it were a cloud, or a city with inhabitants, is many a hint, which may be pursued to clearer and enlarged views. These men, however, wrote principally for a succeeding generation ; their own age was too deeply stamped with its empiric-rationalistic cha- racter, to be much alive to minds so unlike their own. A deep impression was first made by one, who, in the province of philosophy itself, shewed the nothingness of the boasted pretences of the popular philosophy, to build a system on the grounds of ' sound human reason.' Before Kant, German philosophy had been content to specu- late, without entering into the previous question, how far human reason is capable of attaining any certain knowledge in things not cognizable by the senses. This enquiry Kant was induced by the scepticism of Hume to institute, and the re- sult to which his investigations led him was, that " speculative intellect" cannot prove that the ideas, at which it arrives, are more than ideas, that its objects have any objective, independent, exist- ence". Speculative intellect then failing, Kant ^ Garve. ' The object of Kant's enquiry was, wherein consists the con- stitution of our mental nature previous to all experience, what in 6 IGO CAUSES OF THE LATE RATIONALIST tried the way of practical intellect. Here he found as an absolute universal principle, the ' cate- gorical imperative' in man, the consciousness of a fundamental law in his nature, that he ought to realize that which is prescribed by the moral law, so that the maxims of his will on each obcasion might serve as the principles of an universal legis- it exists purely, or a priori ? The three fundamental powers of mind, by which ideas are conveyed to us, are, according to his Kritik der reinen Vernunft, perception, understanding, and in- tellect. In perception, all which exists a priori, is time and space : these however are merely conditions of our power of contem- plating external objects ; exterior to us they are nothing. Under- standing is, according to Kant, the power of reducing the mani- fold objects of perception under generic heads. The summa genera of these (the Categories) in that they comprize all the ob- jects of perception, introduce unity and connection into the sub- jects of contemplation ; and thence results experience. Intellect, lastly, embraces the pure conceptions, which lie beyond all expe- rience, called ideas. Of these the most universal, the" highest and purest, is the Unconditional and Absolute. Of this there are three classes : 1. The absolute unity of the recipient of the im- pressions, when detached from all accidents. 2. The absolute unity of all VIIL PAROCHIAL SERMONS, illustrative of the Importance of the Revelation of God in Jesus Christ. By the Rev. Renn D. Hampden, A.M. late Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford. 12mo. 7s. 6d. IX. A SERIES of DISCOURSES on the STATE of the PROTESTANT RELIGION in GERMANY. Preached be- fore the University of Cambridge, in 1825. Second Edition. (In the Press.) By Hugh James Rose, B.D. Vicar of Horsham, Sussex. Svo. Also, by the same Author, An APPENDIX to the foregoing; being a Reply to the German Critiques on that Work. 8vo. 3s. 6d. The APOCALYPSE of ST. JOHN, or PROPHECY of the Rise, Progress, and Fall of the Church of Rome ; the Inqui- sition ; the French Revolution ; the Universal War ; and the final Triumph of Christianity. Being a new Interpretation. Second Edition. By the Rev. George Croly, A.M. H.R.S.L. Svo. 12s. 6