i -> h L I B R -^ R Y ■ .. OF THE Theological Seminary. ,| PRINCETON, N. J. ! Case Division --•+ 1 Shelf Section. •♦• Book No, A DONATION KEUM 1^^ /f/f-i^/^^* r 1^^ THE EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT O F T H E UNGODLY, lUuftrated and evinced to be a Scripture Do6trine : AND THE Salvation of all Men, As taught in feveral late Publications, confuted. In a new Arrangement of the Subjed in pifputc. In Three PARTS. in the First, — The infinuating Arguments of the Univer- falifts are confidered and refuted ; and the Credibility of the commonly received Do6trine is evinced. In the Second,— -The everlalling Punifhment of the Ungod- ly is illuftrated and evinced. In the Third, — The Arguments of the Univerfalifts, from^ Scripture Texts, and their Evafions, are confidered and refuted. By STEPHEN JOHNSON, M. A. Pallor of the firft Church in Lyme. NEF/ -LONDON: Printed by TIMOTHY GREEN, M,Dcc,Lxxxyi THE INTRODUCTORY PREFACE. WILL the Supreme Judge of the world, in the laft day, fentence us to everlafting life or punilhment accord- ing to our charaders formed in this ftate ? So Chrift hath ex- prefsly taught us , and it is of moft interefting importance to every one, to know and realize it. This was the faith of the Jewifh and Chriftian church in the days of infpiration. This hath been the common faith of the Chriftian church ever fince. This was the faith of our pious forefathers in this land; and hath been the undifputed faith of their pofterity, until the pre- fent age. And confidering the powerful, falutary tendency and influence of this do6i:rine, for the good of men in this world and world to come, is it not to be lamented, that this important article of the Chriftian faith, Ihould be di-awn into queftion ? But fo it is. The contrary do6lrine, '' that all men ihall be faved," is nov/ exhibited to public examination. —A clear ftage — fair dealing and argum^entation — we aik no more. — Great is the power of truth, and it will prevail, — Chrift hath furnifhed his fervants with fuiiicient ability and faithfulnefs, from age to age, to vindicate the faith 'once deli- vered to the faints -, and to unmade and expofe error, however difguifed by art and fophifty j nor need we queftion it in the prefent or any future day. When I read the pamphlet, intitled, " Salvation for all Men," printed in Bofton, 1782, I viewed it as an opening wedge of controverfy -, and thought it duty to turn my tho'ts upon the beft method of defending thedodrine of the future pu- nilhment, as commonly received in the Chriftian world -, which to ii The introduftory PREFACE.' to me appeared, might as well be fupported as any do&ine of like importancej in divine revelation. The plan now ex- hibited, appeared well adapted to the piirpofe , and I had be- gun to write upon it before I knew of any anfwers to that pamphlet. Several anfwers have fince appeared, which, in my judgment, are well executed upon their refpedive plans : And more is faid than enough to anfwer that piece -, the com- mon faith is fubftantially fapported in them : But the contro- verfy doih not reft. A much more laboured treatife, in fup- port of that im-pladed tenet, is imported among us, printed ia London, 1784. It requires an anfwer — none hath yet appear- ed ; — and as the plan now exhibited, is veiy different from that of thofe vrho have gone before me, and on that account may give the reader an advantage to fee truth reprefented and error expofed in various points of view ; it is thought this publication may be needful and ufefuL The two nril parts of ic, have lain by me more than a year* Indeed, the fecond part was delivered in public difcourfes, in the fail 1783, in a time of uncommon general ficknefs in this place, v/hich is the occafion of its appearance in the prefent form. Having turned my attention to the fubjedt, and not knowing that I fliould live to pubiifh any thing upon it, I thought it duty to endeavour to eftablifh my hearers in a point of fo great importance. The public v/ere notified iri 1783, an ingenious work would be pubiiihed, " wherein the fubject is exhaufted 3" which I waited to fee till Odlober, 1784. The third part, is chiefly taken up in a reply to this, which I fuppoie to be the anonymous treatife foremen tioned, intitled, " The myftery hid from ages and generations, made manifefl by gofpel revelation : or, the falvation of all men the grand thing aimed at in the fcheme of God, as opened in the New- Teilament writings, and entrufted with Jefus Chrift to bring into effect:" Printed in London, 1784. It contains 406 pages, exclu five of the preface. It is wrote with ingenuity and much labour, with a difplay of learning and critical geni- t!S, with an appearance of much candour and benevolence 5 but widi a fufficient degree of contempt of the whole Chriftian worid^ The introduaory PREFACE. m world, papal and proteftant, common annotators and Chriftiaa writers, who differ from the author -, accompanied with a vai* riety of infinuating arguments of addrefs, plaufible argumen- tations, and pretenfions ofgood in the dodrine. Wherefore, if the author is miflaken, and ic is fitted only to eftablifh a ruinous error, the more plaulibly it is wrote, it becomes the more enfnaring and dangerous to the reader. It may not be amifs, to give a fketch of the general fcheme of do6lrine in it ; which I take to be this. — In refped to the doflrine of the Trinity, it is Arianifm j— refpeding that of im^putation, Socianifm -, — in refpedt to the dodrmes of grace as commonly called, Pelagianifm j— in refpecl to the intermedi- ate ilate between death and the refurre6lion, fo far as 1 can col- left the fentiment, it better agrees with the Muggletonians than the common chriftian doftrine ;— in refpedl to the future judgment, it is fmgular ; it will be final, and there will be no other public judgment ; and yet it will not be decifive by un- alterably fixing the ftates ofgood or bad men ; the fentencei will never be reverfed by any future judgment ;^ and yet will be temporary, and not of perpetual and everlafting force ;— in refped to the future ftate after the laft judgment, his tranf- mutation ftates better agrees with the notion of fome of the old heathens than with the chriftian fyftem, it being wholly unknown in the revelations of God.— And in hi? do6trine of purgatory, he furpaffes the popes, clergy, and church of Rome itfelf j for his begins after the laft judgment, when theirs is ended. Whether thefe are the author's true fentiments, or only an adopted fcheme to fupport the doftrine of Univerfal Salvation, is not fo material to me or the reader -, nor is it my defign to combat thefe principles any farther than the fubje6i: in debate is concerned ; or the fettling the conftrudirion of iome difputed texts may require. But it Is thus ftated with a view to thefe two remarks : One is, thofe who are fettled in the firm belief of the contrary articles of the chriftian faith, are in no great danger of becoming univerfalifts, on this plan j they would be great loofers by fuch a change : they muft facrifice doflrinea of far greater importance than this filly error can be fuppofed b to iv The introGuaory P R E F A C E. to be. The other, and principal remark, is this : If this im- pleaded tenet cannot be Supported upon this plan, it is in vain to hope for it upon any other whatever. The ingenuity and ability of this writer is inconteftible ; and he hath fpared no labor and pains in the caufe. He had all the world of doc- tines, of truth and error to choofe out of; and he hath taken his ftand of fupport and defence upon this foundation ; and if he now fails of fjpporting it, when enforced v/ith ail the aid of thofe leai-ned men, Mr. Whifton, Scot, Hartly, Hallet, &c. and is re-enforced again with Gog and Magog, under the in- fluence of the devil, introduced to bring up the rear of fupport to one important part of the fcheme, it is in vain to hope it -can ever be fupported upon any plan of doftrine whatever. In this fenfe, ^^ the fubjed is truly exhaufted," This being by far the moft plaufibly wrote, in which their ftrength is col- leded, and " the fubjed; exhaufted ;" fhould it fail of fupport, the univerfalifts, if wife, for their own fake, will not attempt to mend it, for the parts do now hang badly together, and fhould they jollle and alter the pofts and pillars of it, the fu- perilruclui-e certainly falls to ruin with its own weight. Whe- ther it be now fupported, or is fupportable by any means whatever j the reader who carefully attends to the following work in all the parts of it, may be under fome advantage to judge. One thing, perhaps, fhould not be v/holly pafTed over, and may be noticed here, inafmuch as it did not naturally fall in any where in the laft part. We are told, in order to the ad- milTion of this fcheme, " fome generally received dodrines muft be given up, and that it is high time' they fhould be re- nounced and others embraced in their room, more honourable to the father of mercies, and comfortable to the creatures whom his hands have formed.'' Page 14. What are the articles to be embraced in the room of thofe of the chriftian and proteft- ant faith, v/hich are to be renounced ? Why, it feems, we are to receive it as a firll principle, that the end of the creation of the moral world was the happinefs of the creature ; and that if God foreknew any of them (fay the devil and his angels and the finally wicked of mankind) would, by the abufe of their moral The introduaory P R E" F A C E: y moral powers, render themfelves finally niiferable, that then^ he Ihould have withheld from them *^ the gift of exiftence." Page I ft and 3d. Is it polTible to reconcile thefe notions with God's fending his Son into the world to teach us the everlafl- ing fire and punilhment prepared for the devil and his angels, to. which he will fentence both them and the finally wicked, in the laft day ? Will it not follow from this notion, compared with, this dodrine Chrift taught, that God fent his Son to teach the world, he would make thefe creatures miferable, contrary to the end for which he made them, and w^hen he fhould have with-^ held their exiftence ? Is not this deftru6lion to the charadler of the Father and the Son ? Thefe new world makers, and tranfmutation flares makers, are, it feems, vaft projeflors.- They can projecl fuch an efTential change in the nature of things,. as to transfer the obligations of the creature to the creator ; and of the finner to the Saviour : fo that if the rebellious creature perifheth in his iniquity, the reflection of diilionor ihallbe caft upon the Creator and Saviour. Suppofe infinite wildom, pow-^ er and goodnefs dotk not exert itfelf in new created worlds^ tranfmutation ftates, and effedlual meafures of human inven-: tion for the reduction and falvation of all the rebellious, Ihall the Creator and Lord of the world be refiedled on as defe6live. in benevolence ? as not defiring the falvation of his creatures ? and as doing what ought not to be done, in giving them exift-- ence ? Or, if the Saviour doth not fave all who will not come: unto him for life, fhall di (honor be refleCled on him as not ex- ecuting his truft, becaufe they periHi for their faults ? Is there- any foundation in the fcripture docftrine as com.monly receiv-: ed, for fuch abfurd conciufions and bafe reflexions ? Is not- eternal life God's gift ? Are no^ his gifts his own ? May he not do what he will with his own ? Doth not rebellion forfeit this gift ? May>not the wife, jufl, and good Governor of the World punifh the rebellious according to defert ? Thefe felf- evident. truths, are fufficient to fettle this point. I can fee no fervice done to God or man,:by fuch " falfe philofophy and. vain deceit." What honor or fervice can it be to the Moft. High ? We- are too. late by almoft fix thouftud years to b«? ^r Theintrodudory PREFACE. of counfel to the infinitely wife God, to teach hini for what end to create the world, whom to create, and from whom to withhold exiftence ; and what new worlds and tranfmutation ftates to make for the recovery of the rebellious, &c. The divine plan of creation is fettled by the infinitely wife God, according to the council of his own will, and carried into exe^ cution. And he hath taught us the grand end deugned, viz, moral government in its infinitely important conne<5cions, as hereafter ftated and iiluflrated. And this plan of moral go- vernment, ^in which the righteous will be rewarded and the wicked punilhed, in final iflue, hath already exifted in opera^ thn aimofl Cix thoufand years, is now carrying into execution, will remain forever, and be compleated in highefl: perfefti-r on and glory. Neither can thefe notions be any more fer^ vice for the real good, com.fort and happinefs of m.ankind : they cannot inforce the important requifitions of duty in the law and gofpel of God, wherein is found the true good, com- fort and happinefs of mankind ; for the great commandments of love and duty in the law, and of faith, repentance, &c. in the gofpel, all proceed upon this fuppofition and ground— -that God hath an ahfolute right to govern and give law to the ere-, ation — that the creature is fervant to the creator, and not the creator to the creature — and that duty and obligation lies wholly on the creature, and if he rebels and makes himfelf mi- ferable, the fault and blame is in the creature and not in the creator i in the unbelieving and difobedient finner, and not in the Saviour. And it is itrange, that fuch vain fpeculations and bafe refledions, are not long ago filenced and banifhed the chriftian world, by thefe- clear didates of reafon, by the re-, peaied appeals of God to it ; " are not my ways equal and yours unequal ;" by the perpetual doclrine of revelation, eve- ry v/here exprefsly laying the fault upon the creature : " The wicked that is warned but continues in his wickednefe, fhall die in his iniquity, .and his blood Ihall be upon him :" " If thou be wife, thou Ibalt be wife for thyfelf ; but if thou fcorn- eft thou alone fbalt bear it." ^' Thou alone," and not the Creator ar4 Saviour^ fliak bear the blame and reproach with the The introduaory PREFACE, vE the punilhment :" And above all by the oath of God purpofe- iy clearing himfelf from all fuch impious infinuations, fuggef- tions and reflections : ** As I live, faith the Lord God, I have no pleafure in the death of the wicked, but that he turn arid live :" " Turn ye, turn ye, why will you die ?" It would be a hard cafe for any to ftand upon fuch terms with their maker, as not to credit the oath of God, unlefs he would pleafe their fancy in their invented, new created worlds, and tranfmutati- on ftates, which may be very contrary to his all-wife arrange-* ment of things, in his everlafting kingdom.. Is it honorable to the Father of Mercies, to take up the caufe of the devil and bis angels, and of wicked men, againft God ? Hath he commit ifioned any one to teach the world, if thefe creatures are final-* ly miferable in their rebellion, the creator Ihould have with-?* held their exiftcnce ? Judas, for inftance, will be finally mife- rable, if our Lord's words be true : " It had been good for that man if he had not been born," God foreknew this : Witt any fay to God, he Ihould have withheld the gift of cxiftence to him ? Will he fay, this very man was bom an expedlant of 3 bleiTed immortality, upon a foundation which cannot difap-*-. point him ? confequently that our faviour's words cannot te true ; or, if verified in the execution of this woe, Judas will be deprived of his birthright inheritance fecured upon a foundati- on which cannot fail. Will he teach as their " honeft Mr^ Whifton,'' the punifhment is cruel both in the threatning an4; execution -, and that God muft give up his juftice, and much more, his mercy in fuch execution, if Judas be finally and for- ever miferable ? Did God fend his fon into the world to veach. a do&ine falfe and incredible, as they make this to be, and thereby to deftroy the charafter of. the Father and the Son ? Can fuch teaching be for the good of mankind ? Doth it tend to inforce their obedience, and promote their comfort and hap- pinefs ? Yea, doth it not tend diredly to ftrengthen the bands of wickedncfs ? Can it comfort the wicked for man to tell them happinefs is their end, when the God of truth repeatedljr declares " their end is deftru<5i;ion ?" Thefe c^ueftioos carjy their own anfwers in them, and plains yiii The introduaory PREFACE. ly {hew, that thefe men run with their maxims and reafonings of falie pliilofophy and vain deceit/' before they are fent. And it is very likely, if the prophet Ezekiel was now alive, he would give us a new edition of that folemn meffage from God, he addreiTed to lome of the prophets in his day : " With lies ye have made the heart of the righteous lad, whom I have not made fad ; and flrengthened the hands of the wicked, that he Ihould not turn from, his wicked way, by promifing him. life." Ezek. 13. 22. Will any one fay, in the face of this declaration from God, " that the promifing him life doth not ftrengthen the bands of wickednefs, and harden the wicked in it, that he ihould not return from his wicked way ?" Be- lides, if the happinefs of the creature be the ultimate end of creacion, every man may make his own pleafure and happi- nefs his ultimiate end; and what wicked work this would make in this finful world, notwithftanding all the grave cau- tions and councils given againfl it, any man of difcernment and reflection mxay eafily fee. The reader may, I think, find this notion well expofed and confuted in Bifhop Butler's Ana- logy. I fpeak this from^ memory, not having the book by me, and it is, perhaps, tv/enty years fince I read it. Again, — Thefe projectors give us a very different, myfle- rious plan of Salvation, which v/e are to embrace " in the room" of our former faith. And it is faid no man is a com- petent judge of it '^ who has not often read over the New- Teframent in the language in v/hich it was wrote, and lludi- ed Paul's epiHiles for a confiderable time, &c." * This looks fufpicious. It muft be a very different plan from " that ftrait and narrow way of life," and thofe terms of " life and death" taught by our Saviour and his apoilles, which are very plain. This highv/ay of falvation is made fo plain, that it is written '^ v/ayFarinp; men, thous^h fools, fhall not err therein." The character of the tv/o plans, the one given by infpiration, and the other by themfelves, .ihew they cannot be the lame ; and we are not prepared to ''^ renounce" the old and truegof- pel for any other. This projeCled plan, is to fave the finally rebellious, ip fome future new- created worlds and tranfmuta-. tlou * See the Preface, p. 8, 9. The introdudory PREFACE. ix tion ftatcs, and by more efFedual means than the gofpel affords; At firft fight, is this gofpel, or infidelity r It is liable to ftrong objediions, and we iliall hereafter fnew it, felf- confuted. It is fufficient here to fay, thefe proje6tors hav^e not creating wifdom and power, and cannot bring thefe new v/orlds, ftates and elfedual meafures into exiftence and efFe6i:, and give them reality : and it is clear from revelation the Almighty will not.' Again, this plan is, as abfolutely unknown and excluded divine revelation ; as, " the invented tales of fairy land" and there- fore, as chriuians whofe faith is founded on and abfolutely bounded by fcripture, we have nothing to do with it, but to re- je6l it as vain and delufivc. Further, let nor one put any truft in it, for if the gofpel conftitution be confirmed in the day of judgment ; which is as certain as there is truth in the word of God : there is not the leaft chance of fecurity to them on this plan, which is diredlly oppofite to that conftitution : the con- fii-ming the one, is the everlafting overthrow of the other. Moreover, their piety and benevolence feems to need great corredlion. True piety teaches us a hearty acquiefcence in the allwife, perfed government of God, exhibited in fcripture— as founded in perfedl wifdom, immutable truth, righteoufnefs and goodnefs ; and conduced by wife laws, conftitutions and terms of mercy j and enforced by moft wife promifes and threatnings ^ and to be fettled in the day of judgment in a ftate of final re- tribution. True piety and benevolence, influences the fa bje£ts of it to pious endeavours to fupport the authority and govern- ment of God, the requifitions of the law and gofpel, and the promifes and threatnings of God in all their force ; and to en- deavour the repentance of (inful micn, and their -reconciliation to God, upon the merciful term.s of his divine conftitution only. But where do we find piety and benevolence exercifed in taking up the caufe of his enemies againft God ? In iup- porting the prefumptuous hopes of the wicked againft the force of his threatnings ? In taking up, arguing and fupporting their objedlions, and thereby ftrengthening their mifapprehenfions, hard thoughts and prejudices againft the charafter of God as iliuftrated, and the government of God as it will be fettled in the X The introduaory PREFACE. the day of judgment ? By teachin|fthem, if they are finaU ly miferable in their rebellion, and *' deftru6lion be their end," as the fcripture conftantly teacheth, that God Ihould have withheld their exiftence ? And let them be ever fo vile and abominable in their treatment of their Creator and Saviour^ if, after their obilinate rcjedion of life and falvation in this world, he doth not create new worlds and tranfmutation dates, and ufe effedlual meafures for the recovery of all the rebellious, that difhonours will be refledted upon the adorable Creator and Saviour ? Certainly we find no fuch dodlrines taught, no fuch infinuations given out, nor any fuch '^ piety and benevo- lence" exemplified by Mofes and the prophets, by our Saviour and his apofUes, or any faint of God, on fcripture record, v/hich are our ftandard to judge by. Doth it not favour more of the fpirit of Cain, of the murmuring Ifraelites, and of the wicked of the earth, than of the true faints of God ? And can fuch pi- ety and benevolence be genuine in its diredtion, operation and fruit ? Such zeal is prepofleroufly abfurd. And that rebuke, immediately from God, merits our attention, and fhould put and keep us upon guard : " fliall he that contendeth with the Almighty inilrudl him ? he that reproveth God, let him anfwer it." Job 40. 1. This was effedual with holy Job. In a word, let it be noted, it is not here and there a detached arti- cle of the chriflian faith that muft be renounced, but we muft give up the do.flrine of the crofs— the conftitution of nature— and the revciJed conftitution of God, to embrace this new creed ; as will hereafter appear. Surely no good chriilians, who love not their lives to the death for the word of God and teftimony of Jefus, can do this. The people of this land, in this enlightened age, are certainly better inflrufled than to do k ; unlefs heads of families and gofpel miniflers are far more to blame than I believe them to be, in not duly educating and teaching them. It is plain therefore, we cannot poffibly go ^ over to them. What fhall be done to compromife the matter, to fettle the controverfy, and bring us to unity in the faith ? In tiie room of their propofed reform, I would propofe a fub- ^'^itute, v\rhich may be agreed upon by all, without facrincing any The Introduaory PREFACE, xi any truth or didate of reafon or revelation. Tt is thil5. Let us renounce the following rules of fophiftry and falfe argumen- tadon, viz. all attempt ta correal the dodlrine of revelation, by our prejudicate or invented notions of reafon : for the fcrip- ture is given to corre6i: thefe, and not to be corredled by them, *' The world by wifdom knew not God.'* God himfelf hath taught us in his word the true knowledge of his perfedlions, councils and works : in this inftrudion let us refl and abide. Let us lay aiide all attempt to correal: the faith of infpired wri- ters, by affixing a more " glorious m.eaning to their declarati- ons'' than they underftood and intended. Likewife, all argu- ing from the perfections of God, againil fcripture declarations, and the revealed confiiitution of God ; and in that way dedu- cing conclufions againft the tenor of revelation. Alfo, the af- fixing a univerfal fenfe to general terms, without regarding the hecelTary limitation the fubject requires. Falfe rules of con- ftrudlion, by fearching for a hidden and more glorious fenfe, inftead of, and to the fubverfion of the obvious fenfe :— with falfe keys to unlock the meaning of fcripture texts and pafTa- ges, which will not agree with the context, with the fcope and main f'abje6t of the writer, nor with the tenor of revelation, which are the fure rule of a genuine conftru 611 on :— fa6ls mif- tated and argued upon, on the ground of fuch miftatemefit :-— arguings from parity of cafes, v/here there is no parity to fup- port the defigned conclufion :— may-be's and poflibilities af- fumed as datas, and argued upon as realities :— -falfe, ill- grounded criticifms, to put off an invented fenfe inftead of the true meaning of fcripture: — invented evafions inftead offolid arguments":— andabove all, ambiguous words, rendered more ambiguous b^/ falfe criticifms, and then taken up and argued from in the wrong fenfe, without due attention to their con- Reded relation to the context— to important fcripture diftinc- tions— to the connexion of fcripture do6lrines one with ano- ther — and to the true nature of the fubjedl itfelf. And with- ali, words of an important, fixed, decifive m.eaning, fuch as re- conciliation, juftiiication, and falvation itfelf, rendered ambi- guous, to ferve an hypothefis. It is^ indeed^ high time iuoji c rules xii The introduaory PREFACE, rules of fophiftry and falfe argumentation were univerfallf re- nounced ^ although the fupport of the doctrine we implead, wholly depends upon them. Thefe falfe rules, duly noticed, will give the reader an opportunity of judging upon the merits of this difpute, and of the force of what is here written and fiib- mitted to his judgment. I am clear in it, when thefe falfe itiaxims and modes of arguing are once difcarded, it will fuper- fede the pretended need of a reform ; and the articles in difputs between us, may (land, with all reafon and fafety, as they were embraced in the days of infpiration, and have been, by the chriftian church, ever fince. I am no enemy to the univerfalifts, although they rnay ac- count me one, becaufe, with all freedom, I tell them the truth. So far from it, I fincerely wifn their welfare -, and have a perfo- nal refpedl for fome who too much countenance this do&rine. But the error itfelf, I view as of great magnitude and moil ruin- ous confequencc j and have not Ipared, as occafion offered, to expofe it in the folly, abfurdity and wickednefs of it ; to point ^e reader's indignation againft it, as ought to be done. Per- haps more freedom is ufed, than othcrwife might be thought fequifitc, on account of the affuming airs of thefe writers, which may fuffer fome little check without detriment to the caufe of truth, or the good of mankind.* A free, determined manner of writing, becomes the caufe of important truth : and it is natu- ral * Thel^ affuming airs can fcarcely efcape the notice of any difcerning reader. They aiTtime to themfelves fuch a fuperiorlty, as to look down tipoii the chrillian world, who differ from them, as far inferior in mental ^ifeernment and improvemenCj and in chriftian benevolence. This ap- pears in their treatment of the conftrudlions of common annotators and chriftian divines with fovereign contempt, and in more dired ways. Mr. Whifton fuggefts, that only weak enthufiafts and divines, bigoted to topi- cal orthodoxy, and deficient in real fagacity and true judgment, could freely preach the common doflrine. Mr. White, in his charity, ililes them '* miftical Je^vs." Mr. Kelly, in his civility, ftiles his opponents " ba-rkingcurs.'* Another inferior author, fpeaks of them as having the vail on their hearts, and blinded by the God of this world. A more po- lite writer, who reveres the piety of our forefathers, yet exhibits them as ifet of idolatarsj portraying the God they worfhip ** deftitute of truth and iincerity," which cannot be the true God. And the humble, *' piou?'* Dr. The introduaory PREFACE. xiii ral to us when we reprefent what we firmly believe, and have no fear about us, but of cautipn not to give juft offence, and of concern left we fhould fail to do jufticc to the fubjed by not flrongly evincing the truths of God we are engaged to fupporr. The minds of fome in this degenerate age, are unhappily un- hinged froni principle, and need to be fixed : and in many, th$ iprings of mental ^nd moral feelings feem greatly run down | or Dr. Hartly aiFefts a fuperiority over ^* the facred writers themfelves,'* to give us a more full meaning of ^' their glorious declarations'* than their cour traded minds underftood. And this beneyolent writer, in his candour, judges that the cKriftian v/orld, proteftant as well as papal, that difFef from him in tiicfe points, rec&ive, for fcripture truths, as grofs abfurditie^ and palpably wrong and difhonourable ideas of God, as infidels in the dark ages and places of paganifm. p. 862, 3. Thefe afluming, eenfur- ing, contemning ^irs, are apt to make undue impreffions opon weak minds ; ^ which reafon they are noticed. Timid anfwers would rather faftea than remove the' ill impreffions. Whether thefe ^^' airs" be defigned as g weapon of policy, like Britiih proclamations, to force us by their terror tp (jibmiflion or filence, or are owing to the evil fpirit of the error itfelf, I ^efume not to det