'to | THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, | * «* . # # Princeton, N. J. #■ >3 Sc ? - ya-eg^ e^ BT 790 .D6 1829 Doddridge, Philip Practical discourses on regeneration •1' 4 f SELECT CHRISTIAN AUTHORS WITH INTRODUCTORY ESSAYS. EuBLLSHE'D HY AVTHLIAM COLLINS GLASGrOYT. PRACTICAL. DISCOURSES ON REGENERATION, AND ON THE % SCRIPTURE DOCTRINE OF SALVATION BY FAITH. / BY P. DODDRIDGE, D.D. WITH AN INTRODUCTORY ESSAY, BY RALPH WARDLAW, D.D. GLASGOW'. GLASGOW: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM COLLINS; WILLIAM WHYTE & CO. AND WILLIAM OLIPHANT, EDINBURGH; W. F. WAKEMAN; AND WM. CURltY, JUN. & CO. DUBLIN ; WHITTAKER, TREACHER, & ARNOT; HAMILTON, ADAMS, & CO. SIMPKIN AND MARSHALL ; BALDWIN & CRADOCK; AND HURST, CHANCE, & CO. LONDON. MDCCCXXIX. rrinted \v* W. Collins & Co. Glasgow. •\sUrt P & IE CE TOIT kTHEOLOGICiL %-^Spr^ KTN&BS - k , h(v v ---r * INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. The word Salvation necessarily suggests the idea of some existing evil, from which deliverance has either been effected, or is required. In its simple primary meaning, it has no exclusive reference to one description of evil or of deliverance more than to another. But in general use, it has become so very much appropriated to the deliverance revealed by the gospel, that we are apt to feel as if it were desecrated when we hear it applied to any preserva¬ tion or rescue, whether personal or national, of a merely secular and temporary nature. But, even when it is understood to be used in its highest acceptation, the conceptions associated with it by multitudes are exceedingly partial and un¬ worthy. The idea which it most immediately, and often, it is to be feared, exclusively, suggests, is that of deliverance from suffering,—from the penal con¬ sequences of sin,—from hell. That this is included in salvation,—and a part of it which no considerate mind, properly impressed with the deserts of trans¬ gression, will lightly estim£fte,‘—we freely and thank¬ fully admit. But there is a sadly prevailing dispo- VI sition to dwell upon it, to give it an undue promi¬ nence, so as to throw into the back ground, and almost out of view, another part of the blessing in¬ comparably more elevated and excellent. The source of this disposition is to be found in the selfish cor¬ ruption of our nature. As depraved creatures, we are naturally fond of sin; but we are naturally no less unfond of its punishment. We need not the grace of God, that we may be taught to dislike and deprecate suffering. The nature which we pos¬ sess in common, not only with all intelligent, but with all sensitive existence, teaches us this with irresistible energy. It has all the force of an in¬ stinctive principle. The salvation which our fallen nature would choose for itself, would be, deliverance from the punishment, and from all apprehension of it, along with a plenary indulgence to the commission of the sin. There is no indigenous desire in our nature ‘ of deliverance from sin itself. An eternity of un¬ punished sin, is the salvation it would like; a salva¬ tion unworthy of the name, and which it is a moral impossibility that God should bestow. To the mind of an angel,—of one of those spirits of light who retain the blessedness of sinless intimacy with the uncreated purity of the Godhead, and draw their untainted joy from the fountain of divine love, —who feel that their glory and their happiness lie in their likeness to that infinite Being whose nature is the archetype of all that is excellent and lovely in the moral universe,—to the mind of an angel, the word salvation , we cannot doubt, would primarily and instantly suggest the thought of deliverance from sin. This would hold the first place. Con- • « Vll sequences would stand secondaryexcept indeed the consequence of sin’s unfitting the subject of it for the enjoyment of God,—breaking off that holy fellowship which is to themselves the very zest and relish of their being,—the life of life. And this could hardly be called a consequence. So insepar¬ ably associated would it be in their minds with sin, that it might be considered as involved in their very conception of it,—sin being, in its spirit and essence, alienation from God. And to such minds, alienation from God would express the very essence of misery. Simple pain, could they abstract it in their imagina¬ tions from the consciousness of this, would be as no¬ thing. They would be ashamed to speak or to think of it. Oh ! what amount of mere physical suffering would not a holy creature be willing to endure, could it be allowed to retain, in the midst of it, conscious purity and conscious union of spirit with God ! And if such would be the light in which sin and suffering would be viewed by a holy creature, how much more by that God himself whose purity and wisdom and love are alike infinite !-*—Yet, when we speak of holiness ranking first in his estimate of every intelligent creature’s condition, still we must consider, as associated with this, the tendency of holi¬ ness to that creature’s happiness.—“ God is light and £t God is love.” The purity and the benevo¬ lence of his nature are its glory and felicity :—in the infinitude of both he is infinitely blessed. And throughout the intelligent universe, he has associ¬ ated happiness with holiness and love by an indis¬ soluble bond. In the establishment of this associ¬ ation, he has manifested equally the love and the Vlll holiness of his own character. His love, or his benevolent regard to happiness, is displayed, in his bringing creatures into being possessed of the char¬ acter with which his own blessedness is connected. —All that God himself is, he is by an inherent and immutable necessity of his moral nature. He can¬ not but be holy; he cannot but be good; he cannot but be happy. Whenever the idea enters our minds of any thing short of perfect holiness, perfect good¬ ness, and perfect happiness,—we have lost our con¬ ception of Godhead. The same necessity which fixes in unsullied immutability the rectitude of his moral nature, connects that rectitude with the in¬ finite fulness of bliss. The cause and the effect are alike necessary. The creature that could fancy God to cease to be holy, and yet continue to be happy, would possess, in the very capacity of forming such an association, a sufficient evidence of its own de¬ pravity. No rightly constituted mind can possibly associate the ideas of deficient holiness and perfect happiness. When God makes a holy creature, he neces¬ sarily makes a happy creature:—and in this, we have said, he shows his benevolence . He, at the same time, manifests his regard to holiness , by the very circumstance of his uniting happiness with it; and so determining, by a fixed principle, the whole moral constitution of the universe, that happiness shall not be enjoyed by any rational creature of his without it.—This is a settled law of his administration ; from which, we may be well assured, there is no departure. We honour God, when we say of him, as his own word teaches us IX to say, that “ it is impossible for him to lie. 5> On the same principle, we equally honour him when we affirm that he cannot ,—that it is morally impossible for him, to make a happy creature, otherwise than by making a holy creature. We mean not to enter into the mystery of the origin of evil , in the universe of a Being whose character is Light and Love ;—a mystery which, after all the attempts that have been made to clear it of perplexing questions, remains a mystery still. —We would simply remind our readers, that the existence of moral evil is a matter of fact , inde¬ pendent of all religions, and of all systems of doc¬ trine and of morals. It is i)ot a doctrine of revela¬ tion ; it is a fact in providence. It was a fact before revelation existed ; and even before human beings existed: for there were fallen angels before there were fallen men. The entrance of sin into our world was not the origin of evil; it was only the extension of it,—the communication of it from one race of creatures to another. So that the same fact would have existed, and the same difficulties in con¬ nexion with it, had our globe itself never been called into being. These difficulties attach to every system. The rejection of revelation brings not the infidel one step nearer to a solution of them ; nay, it removes him many steps further from it. The man who should reject the Bible because he cannot, satisfac¬ torily to himself, account for the existence of moral evil, must necessarily, on the same principle, discard natural religion. Lie has no consistent halting- place, indeed, till he reaches atheism. And there,-— he will only have solved one difficulty by adopting a 3 X another infinitely greater. Another, did we say ? We should rather say, by embracing a scheme which involves in it all other possibilities of inconsistency and contradiction imaginable by the human mind. Let a man conceive the Scripture statement of the manner of sin’s entrance into our world to be as ab¬ surd as he pleases; let him reject as fabulous, the very existence of evil angels, to whose temptation it is ascribed ; and let him adopt any' other account of its origin he may choose to feign to himself:—still the fact remains. The difficulties arising from it are entirely unaffected by any hypothesis whatever about the mode of its actual origination.—Evil exists :—it was in the power of God to prevent it:— he has not done so. Such being the simple state of the case, which conclusion is the more reasonable, which the most in harmony with the humble-mind— edness becoming a frail and fallible creature—This must be wrong, for I cannot reconcile it with my conceptions of rightor, “ There are, indepen¬ dently of this perplexing fact, grounds abundantly sufficient for a firm belief in the divine goodness and holiness : whether, therefore, I can perceive a principle of reconciliation or not, this must be con¬ sistent with holiness and goodness, for it actually has place under the administration of a good and holy Being?” Surely the former must be felt, by every well-ordered mind, to be the dictate of pre¬ sumption, and the latter, not of weakness, but of becoming self-diffidence. But we cannot satisfy ourselves with saying, that the rejection of Christianity, or rather, of revelation in general, on account of a fact which exists inde- XI pendently of it, and with which it can in no con¬ ceivable way be chargeable, is in itself absurd. We must go further. The man who is in earnest in lamenting the fact, should rather have a predilection for whatever professes to furnish a remedy, or an alleviation- of it. To the mind of such a man, revelation should, on this ground, have a powerful attraction. It presents the only mitigation, the only cure. Other systems find the fact, and leave it as they found it. They furnish no mitigation of the mischief. They leave the ruin a ruin still; the moral waste as barren and dreary as before; the spiritual distemper in all its deadly virulence. Not so the word of the living God. It provides means of recovery for diseased and dying souls. It reclaims the unsightly wilderness, clears it of its briars and thorns, and covers it with the fruits of righteousness. It rears on the ruins of human nature a magnificent and lovely temple, where Deity delights to dwell, and where he is worshipped in the beauty of holi¬ ness.’ ’ By its sublime discoveries, the very ad¬ mission of moral evil into the universe, is made the occasion of a more brilliant manifestation than ever could have been given without it, of both the light and the love of the divine character; presenting us with proofs the most convincing, interesting, and overwhelming, that its admission arose from no light estimate of its turpitude—no approbation, no indif¬ ference. The means proposed there, for restoring the subjects of it in our world from its power and prevalence, and from the misery which it has en¬ tailed upon them, are such as, at the same time, to affix to it the indelible brand of divine reprobation, XU as u the abominable thing which he hates.” Every man, therefore, we repeat, who sincerely laments the existence of moral evil, ought, if he would be con¬ sistent with himself, to delight in the discoveries of revelation. The man who, in words, deplores the woes of slavery, and compassionates its hapless vic¬ tims, must, if he be in earnest, rejoice in the adop¬ tion, and prosecution, and success of all measures for alleviating the amount of wrong and suffering. If he shows no satisfaction in the mitigation of the lamented evils, we are warranted to conclude that his horrors are feigned, that his pity is a mere pre¬ text, and that his real wish is, that they may remain, to furnish him with a theme for malicious declama¬ tion against slave-traders and slave-holders, the ob¬ jects of some selfish and unworthy antipathy. In like manner, the man who professes to lament moral evil, and yet gives no heed to revelation, when it proposes a divinely efficacious remedy—a means of renovation and blessing to the sinner, and of glory to his dishonoured God—gives good ground for suspicion, that, after all, he has secretly no dislike to it, but, amidst his hypocritical regrets, enjoys the occasion furnished by it, of irreligious opposition to God. The damsel, possessed with the spirit of divina¬ tion, who followed Paul and Silas, during their stay at Philippi, crying after them, “ These men are the servants of the most high God, who show unto us THE WAY or salvation,” uttered in these words, the great end, not only of the apostolic ministry, but of divine revelation in general. Salvation is its glorious and merciful purpose; and we have Xlll already hinted at the two leading parts of this salva¬ tion. They are pardon and purity ;—the restora¬ tion of the two great blessings which constituted the original glory and happiness of our nature, but which were lost together by the entrance of sin— the favour and the image of God. These blessings are inseparable; so inseparable, that in no one in¬ stance since the beginning of the world, has the one been possessed without the other; and they may be considered as including in them, or drawing after them, all other spiritual blessings in this life, and the £< fulness of joy, and pleasures for ever¬ more,” in which salvation is consummated in the life to come. Under the government of the “righ¬ teous Lord, who loveth righteousness,” we cannot form to ourselves the conception of a pardoned sin¬ ner remaining unsanctified, or of a sanctified sinner remaining unpardoned. Deliverance from sin in judicial charge , and deliverance from sin in personal character , are alike indispensable to happiness. Nei¬ ther forgiveness without sanctity, nor (could we connect ideas so incongruous and contradictory) sanctity without forgiveness, could make a sinful and guilty creature happy. Pardon without sanctity, or the remission of .punishment without a change of character, is a thing not only in itself abstractly conceivable—it is not unfrequently realized in the administration of human governments. A prisoner may be dismissed from the bar, with a full pardon of the crime for which he has been tried ; or, after receiving sen¬ tence of death, and lying for a time under it, he may obtain, from his prince’s clemency, a plenary XIV remission of his sentence, and have his fetters struck from his limbs, and the door of his cell thrown open to him : but he may leave the place of his confine¬ ment with a heart entirely unchanged; with all his wicked dispositions and propensities to crime as unsubdued and powerful as ever. His condition is thus altered ; but his character is the same. He is pardoned, but he is not reformed. One act of theft, or robbery, or murder, has been forgiven him; but he is, in principle, a thief, a robber, a murderer still. But what thus, of necessity, takes place under human governments, is, in no case, exemplified under the divine. When a sinner obtains forgiveness, or, as the Scripture expresses it, is “justified by faith,” there is a provision made by the gospel, forming a part of its very constitution, and admitting of no ex¬ ception—that the faith of the same truth which con¬ veys to him the message of mercy, and imparts a sense * of divine forgiveness to his conscience, becomes si¬ multaneously the principle of his inward purification. So uniform is this provision—so firmly and unalter¬ ably ratified this connexion—that in the soul which the truth, professedly believed, has not renewed and purified, the sense of pardon and of peace with God which it has communicated, must be a wretched delusion. The purpose of God by the gospel is, to restore fallen men to honour and to happiness. But to true honour and true happiness they never can be restored, by jiardon alone. Were sin still to re¬ main, in its pollution and power, there would re¬ main an insuperable bar to all true glory and true joy. There would remain cleaving to the soul, that XV which must ever be its curse and infamy;—that which, even amidst the incense of human adulation, and the splendours of the “ honour that cometh from men,” must ever render it vile, and abject, and loathsome in the sight of God : and there would remain, moreover, that which, by a native and ne¬ cessary tendency, severs th.e soul from God, unfits it for fellowship with him, incapacitates it for the chief happiness of every intelligent nature, shuts it out from the Fountain of joy;—an exclusion which is not the effect of any arbitrary mandate, or prohi¬ bitory decree, but which arises from the nature of things—from the moral incapacity of a sinful soul to have any enjoyment in holiness. Wherein consist the glory and the blessedness of Deity himself? Certainly, as has already been said, in his moral perfections. He is glorious, because he islioly:—he is happy, because he is holy. His glory and his happiness are infinite and immutable, because he is infinitely and immutably holy. His eternity, omnipresence, omniscience, and omnipo¬ tence, would be divested of their true glory, could they by any possibility be dissevered from holiness and love, and associated with impurity or malevo¬ lence:—nor, thus associated, could any such perfec¬ tions ever render their possessor happy. Awful they would render Him,—unspeakably awful,—the dread of a trembling universe:—-but happiness would be a name for nothing existing,—for nothing, indeed, of which the creatures of such a Being, if even the Being himself, could form the imagination. It is the union of light and love, as comprehending all XVI the excellencies of moral perfection:—it is this union, associated with unlimited knowledge, and power, and presence, for enabling him to carry into certain and full effect all his holy and benevolent de¬ signs,—that constitutes the true honour and the true felicity of the divine nature. Likeness to God in his moral excellencies consti¬ tuted the glory and the happiness of the human na¬ ture, when it came originally from his own creative hand. When God said, 66 Let us make man in our image, after our likeness,” he could not have said more emphatically, Let us make man a glorious and happy creature. And this moral conformity to the divine character is the substantial glory and happi¬ ness of the whole rational creation. We are far too little impressed with this; and the lightness and in¬ constancy of the impression are owing to the natural earthliness of our minds. When we form to our imaginations the idea of Paradise, and of primeval enjoyment, the picture that is most apt to present it¬ self is that of a fine garden, stored and adorned with all the possible varieties of beauty, and fragrance, and convenience, and provision ; whatever could con¬ tribute to give to every sense its full measure of gra¬ tification. Nor would we, while we say this, forget, that the place prepared by their kind Creator for the abode of the first parents of our race during the short period of happy innocence, (the only real golden age of our history,) ivas such a garden; which “ the Lord God planted,” and in which he “ made to grow every tree that was pleasant to the sight and good for food.” The creature he had formed pos¬ sessed a complex constitution of body and soul, an XVII animal nature as well as an intellectual and moral; and the provision made for him was adapted to all his capacities and modes of enjoyment. This is true. But what we mean is, that our minds are too prone to be captivated by the external and physical delights. We are too sensual, too Mahometan. We think too much of locality, and too little of character; too much of what is outward and adventitious, and too little of what is spiritual and essential; too much of the creature, and too little of the Creator; too much of the gifts, and too little of the Giver. The beau¬ ties, and fruits, and balm-breathing airs of Eden, were not the happiness of sinless man. They were subordinate accessories to his enjoyment; but un¬ worthy of being named with the essential springs of his bliss. It was the light of divine knowledge in the understanding, and the light of divine purity in the heart, perfectly fitting and delightfully disposing him for communion with the holiness and the love of God, that formed the essential elements of his un¬ mingled felicity. This was Paradise :—and Eden, “ the garden of the Lord,” even if it had retained all its sweets in undiminished richness, and all its beauties in unblighted loveliness, must have ceased to be Paradise when it became the abode of sin. The place might have remained the same; but innocence alone would make it the residence of true joy. When that was lost,—when the conscience was defiled, and the heart estranged, and the presence and the bless¬ ing of Jehovah were withdrawn, the name of the garden was no longer Eden, but Ichabod. t{ The glory was departed,” the light of joy extinguished. Man the sinner could not enjoy Paradise,—for he could not enjoy God. XV111 And that which is true of our thoughts of Para¬ dise, is too true also of our thoughts of heaven. They are too earthly. Such ideas as unrenewed nature forms of the place are entirely sensual. They cannot be otherwise. It has no relish for joys of a higher order. The vague conception, therefore, which it forms, (and very vague it gene¬ rally is,) is that merely of freedom from the sufferings of the present life, and of enjoyments, more gross or more refined according to the tastes and habits of dif¬ ferent minds,—but none of them more than intellec¬ tual, none of them centering in God. In its very conceptions of heaven itself, the depraved heart <£ for¬ sakes the Fountain of living water, and hews out for itself broken cisterns that can hold no water.”—But even of the renewed mind, the views and contempla¬ tions are- often not sufficiently spiritual. There is too much of the sights that are to charm our eyes, and the sounds that are to ravish our ears. The splendours of the heavenly city, as seen in mystic vision,—the gold, and the precious stones, and the pearls, the effulgent light, the white throne, the river of the water of life, and the trees of life on its banks, are apt to leave on our earthly and carnal minds too literal and worldly impressions. We think too little of what is purely spiritual; of what we are to be , in holy character; and of that, as fitting us for the im¬ mediate, and perfect, and uninterrupted fruition of God ;—of the sanctified soul, freed from every ves¬ tige of moral defilement, coming into contact and in¬ timacy with the untainted purity of the Godhead, and drawing from that perennial fountain its fulness of joy. XIX Let us not be mistaken. With our Bibles be¬ fore us, we cannot but think it extravagant to speak of heaven and hell as no more than names for oppo¬ site descriptions of character. They are places, or regions. Where they respectively are, we cannot tell. But that they have a locality, and an adapta¬ tion to their respective purposes of enjoyment and of suffering, we entertain no doubt. Heaven is a place. The body of the glorified Redeemer is there. The bodies of Enoch and Elijah, the two favoured exceptions to the common sentence of mortality, are there. The bodies of all the re¬ deemed people of God, whether raised from their graves or found alive at the coming of the Lord, shall be there. And these bodies, although refined from all that is gross, and earthly, and corruptible, shall still he bodies;—spiritual, when compared with the present animal frame, but not divested of mate¬ riality, not identified with spirit; and to the modes of enjoyment and of service of which these bodies may be susceptible, the materialism of heaven will be in all respects adapted. And all the images of glory and beauty are exhausted in the description of it. But oh ! if our hearts be rightly disposed,—to b.e like God will be the supreme object of our unceas¬ ing and fervent aspiration. Perfect holiness will be looked up to by us, as the summit of honour and of joy—the highest point of the soul’s attainment. All that is external, whatever it may be, will be dis¬ regarded in comparison with this. It will have (i no glory, by reason of the glory that excelleth.” There will be no beauty in our eyes like the “ beauty of holiness.” This will be the pearl of great price, for XX which we would willingly part with every thing be¬ sides. With nothing short of this will our souls be satisfied. By the degree in which it is subservient to this will the value of every thing else be esti¬ mated. This will be the main object of all our prayers and of all our efforts. And the full enjoy¬ ment of this will be the chief recommendation of heaven. The renewed soul, burdened with remain¬ ing corruption, and surrounded and distressed by the sights and sounds of iniquity, will long and sigh for a sinless world ! a world, where all shall be light,— pure untainted light,—the light of God !—a world, where, holy as God is holy, it shall be happy as God is happy ! This, we think, is the interesting light in which things are viewed by the blessed God himself. Ho¬ liness is the grand aim of the whole mediation of his Son. The atonement of the Redeemer, it is true, was more immediately designed as a manifesta¬ tion of the righteousness of God, and a means of se¬ curing its glory, in the forgiveness of sin ,—in order that, as the Apostle expresses it, 66 he might be just, and the justifier of him who believeth in Jesus;’’— that he might give free and honourable exercise to the mercy wherein he delightetb, in the dispensation of pardon to the guilty.—But still, we are satisfied that this, although the immediate, was not the ulti¬ mate intention,—that there was something beyond, something above it. We cannot for a moment ima- gine the purpose to stop here,—to stop with pardon. No; there is another and a higher end; an end, to which pardon itself, precious, inestimably precious as it is, is subordinate and subservient. Does any sin- XXI ner, awakened to a sense of guilt, and trembling un¬ der an apprehension of wrath, wonder what that can be? We answer,— the production of holi¬ ness. —What is the effect designed to be produced on sinners by the manifestation in the cross of God’s 1829. CONTENTS SERMON I, OF THE CHARACTER OF THE UNREGENERATE. Ephesians ii. 1, 2.—“ And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience,” ..... 49 SERMON II. OF THE NATURE OF REGENERATION, AND PARTICU¬ LARLY OF THE CHANGE IT PRODUCES IN MENS APPREHENSIONS. 2 Corinthians v. 17.—“If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new,” ....... 72 SERMON Hi; OF THE NATURE OF REGENERATION, WITH RESPECT TO THE CHANGE IT PRODUCES IN MEN’S AFFECTIONS, RESOLUTIONS, LABOURS, ENJOYMENTS AND HOPES. From the same text, ....... 94 SERMON IV. THE NECESSITY OF REGENERATION, ARGUED FROM THE IMMUTABLE CONSTITUTION OF GOD. John iii. 3.—“Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God,” ...... 120 SERMON V. OF THE INCAPACITY OF AN UNREGENERATE PERSON FOR RELISHING THE ENJOYMENTS OF THE HEA¬ VENLY WORLD, From the same text, 148 xl CONTENTS SERMON VI. OF THE IMPORTANCE OF ENTERING INTO THE KING¬ DOM OF HEAVEN. From the same text,.172 SERMON VII. OF THE NECESSITY OF DIVINE INFLUENCES TO PRO¬ DUCE REGENERATION IN THE SOUL. Titus iii. 5, 6.—“ Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; which he shed on us abundantly, through Jesus Christ our Saviour,” 197 SERMON VIII. OF THE VARIOUS METHODS OF THE DIVINE OPERATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF THIS SAVING CHANGE. 1 Corinthians xii. 6.—“ There are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all,” . . 224 SERMON IX. DIRECTIONS TO AWAKENED SINNERS. Acts ix. 6.—“ And he, trembling and astonished, said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do ?” . . . 2o8 SERMON X. AN ADDRESS TO THE REGENERATE, FOUNDED ON THE PRECEDING DISCOURSES. James i. 18.—“Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of first-fruits of his crea¬ tures,” .278 THE SCRIPTURE DOCTRINE OF SALVATION BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH. SERMON I. Ephesians ii. 8.—“ For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,” . . 305 SERMON II. o O 28 From the same text, . DISCOURSES ON regeneration. I PREFACE. It is undoubtedly the duty of every wise and good man, to be forming schemes for the service of God and his fellow-creatures in future years, if he be continued to them; and it will be his prudence to do it early in life, that he may be gradually prepar¬ ing to execute them in the most advantageous man¬ ner he can. But while a man’s heart is thus devis¬ ing his way, the Lord directeth his steps. And as many such schemes will probably be left unfinished at death, #which will quickly come to break off our purposes and the thoughts of our hearts; so it is not improbable that they who humbly and obediently follow the leadings of Divine Providence and Grace, may often find themselves called out, on a sudden, to services which, but a little before, were quite un¬ thought of by them. This has been the case with me in most of the Sermons I have published, of which very few were composed with any view to the press; and it is most remarkably so with respect to these on Regeneration. Besides many other excellent persons, my much honoured friend, Dr. Wright, has handled the sub¬ ject in so judicious and lively a manner, and, through the great goodness of God to us, so many thousands 44 of his treatise are dispersed in all parts of our land, that I could hardly have believed any one who had told me I should thus have resumed it; nor had I the least intention of doing it, when I began that course of Lectures which I now offer to my reader’s I did indeed think it necessary, last year, to treat the subject more largely than I had ever done before, knowing in the general how important it is, and ob¬ serving that several controversies had about that time been raised concerning it, which, (though I do not judge it necessary to mention the particulars of them,) I was ready to fear, might have had an evil influence to unsettle men’s minds, and either to lead them into some particular errors, or into a general apprehension that it was a mere point of speculation, about which it was not necessary to form any judgment at all.* That these Discourses might be more generally useful, I determined to preach them on Lord’s-day evenings, that those of my neighbours, who were not my stated hearers, might, if they thought proper, have an opportunity of attending them : and, accor- dinglvj they were attended to the last with uncom¬ mon diligence; a great many persons, of different persuasions and communions, making up a part of the auditory. As practical instruction and improve¬ ment was the main thing I had in view, I knew it was necessary to make my discourses .as plain, as free, and as serious as I could. But before I had finished half of my scheme, several of my hearers earnestly requested that the Sermons might be pub- * See Mr. Hebden’s Appendix to his late Discourse on Re¬ generation. 45 lished: and the request grew more extensive and importunate every week, with this additional circum¬ stance, (which I much regarded,) that some very pious and judicious friends at a distance, being pro¬ videntially brought to the hearing of some of these Lectures, strongly concurred in the desire; express¬ ing a very cheerful hope, that the reading of what they had heard might be useful in distant parts of the land, to which, they assured me, they would en¬ deavour to spread them, as opportunity might offer. As the advice of several of my brethren in the minis¬ try was joined with all this, I thought myself bound in duty at length to comply; which I was the rather encouraged to do, from the several instances in which I had reason to believe the Divine blessing had, in some measure, attended these Sermons from the pul¬ pit, and had made them the means of producing aud advancing the change they described and enforced. On these considerations, I applied myself to re¬ collect the substance of them as well as I could, from the short hints I had written of them, with the assistance of those notes which some of my friends had taken. Some things are perhaps omitted, though I believe but very few; some contracted, and some enlarged; but my hearers will find them, in the main, what they heard. It cost me more labour than I was aware, from such materials, to reduce them into their present form. I shall leave it to my reader to observe for him¬ self the manner and method in w'hich I have handled my subject, without giving him a particular view of it here; only must beg leave to tell him, in the gen¬ eral, that I hope he will find I have not presumed so 46 far on the sublimity of my subject, as to talk with¬ out determinate ideas; for which reason I have omit¬ ted many phrases, used particularly of late by some pious and worthy persons, because I freely own, that as Lcannot find them in my Bible, so neither can I understand their exact meaning; and it seems very improper to embarrass such plain discourses as these with a language, which, not being thoroughly mas¬ ter of, I may chance to misapply, supposing those phrases to be really more proper than I can at pre¬ sent apprehend they are. I have endeavoured to keep to one idea of Regeneration, which I take to be that which the Scripture suggests: by Regenera¬ tion I mean ‘ a prevailing disposition of the soul to universal holiness, produced and cherished by the influences of God’s Spirit on our hearts, operating in a manner suitable to the constitution of our na¬ ture, as rational and accountable creatures.’ If this be (as I think I have proved at large that it is) the Scriptural notion of it, it will follow, that no¬ thing which may be found where this is not, or which may not be found where this is, can be Re¬ generation in the Scripture sense, which is that sense in which we are much more concerned, than we are in that to which any human writers, whether ancient or modern, may think proper to apply it. If the doctrine which I have endeavoured, in the whole course of these Sermons, to confirm and illus¬ trate by the word of God, be in one form or another generally taught by my brethren in the ministry, of whatever denomination, I rejoice in it for their own sakes, as well as for that of the people under their care. I am very little inclined to contend about 47 technical phrases of human invention, which have, with equal frailty, been idolized by some, and ana¬ thematized by others. We shall, I hope, learn more and more to bear one another’s burdens, and to study the kindest interpretations which the words of each other will admit. But I must take the liberty to say, I am, in my conscience, persuaded, that this view of things which is here proposed, though perhaps not very fashionable, is, in the general, so edifying, and so naturally leads to the frequent review of many other important doctrines of Christianity, which are closely connected with it, that I am well satisfied it will be our wisdom to adhere to it, and to make it very familiar to our own minds, and to those of our hearers. Nor can I imagine, that any variety in the idioms of different languages, or the customs of different ages and na¬ tions, can be a sufficient reason for bringing Scrip¬ ture phrases into disuse, while we keep to the ori¬ ginal ideas signified by them. There seems to be a peculiar felicity in them to express divine truth ; and they will undoubtedly be found the safest vehicle of religious knowledge, and the surest bond of union among Christians; while, however we may differ in other matters, we so generally agree in ac¬ knowledging that our Bibles contain the oracles of God. Let us, therefore, who, under different denomi¬ nations, are honoured with the ministry of the ever¬ lasting gospel, agree, for a while at least, to suspend our debates upon less necessary subjects, that we may, with united efforts, concur in prosecuting that great design for which the gospel was revealed, the 48 Spirit given, and our office instituted. And since it is so evident that irreligion has grown upon us, while we have been attending to other, and, to be sure, smaller matters, let us, by a plain, serious, and zealous way of preaching the most vital truths of Christianity, joined with a diligent inspection of the souls committed to our care, try what can be done towards preventing the progress of this grow¬ ing apostacy, and recovering the ground we have already lost. Ignorant and prejudiced people may perhaps accuse us of bigotry or enthusiasm; but let us do our best to convince them of their error by the candour of our temper, and the prudence of our conduct; and remember, that, as Chrysostom excellently speaks in those lively words, “ It is a sufficient consolation for our labours, and far more than an equivalent for all, if we may have a testi¬ mony in our consciences, that we compose and regu¬ late our discourses in such a manner as may be ap¬ proved by God, in whose name we speak.” Northampton, Nov. 7 , 1741 . REGENERATION. SERMON I. OF THE CHARACTER OF THE UNREGENERATE. Ephesians ii. 1, 2. “ And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins ; wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience.” Among all the various trusts which men can repose on each other, hardly any appears to me more so¬ lemn and tremendous than the direction of their sacred time, and especially of those hours which they spend in the exercise of public devotion. These seasons take up so small a part of our lives, when compared with that which the labours and recrea¬ tions of them demand, and so much depends upon their being managed aright, that we who are called to assist you in the employment and improvement of them, can hardly be too solicitous that we discharge the trust in a manner which we may answer to God C 44 50 and to you. If this thought dwell upon the mind with due weight, it will have some sensible influence upon our discourses to you, as well as on the strain of those addresses which we present to the throne of grace in your name, and on your account. We shall not be over-anxious about the order of words, the elegance of expression, or the little graces of composition, or delivery; but shall study to speak on the most important subjects, and to handle them with such gravity and seriousness, with such solem¬ nity and spirit, as may, through the divine blessing, be most likely to penetrate the hearts of our hearers; to awaken those that are entirely unconcerned about religion, and to animate and assist those, who, being already acquainted with it, desire to make continual advances, which will be the case of every truly good man. It is my earnest prayer for myself, and for my brethren in the ministry, of all denominations, that we may, in this respect, approve our wisdom and integrity to God, and 6t commend ourselves to the consciences of all men.” It is our charge, as we shall answer it another day to <£ the God of the spirits of all flesh,” to use our prudent and zealous endeavours to make men truly wise and good, vir¬ tuous and happy.- But, to this purpose, it is by no means sufficient to content ourselves merely with attempting to reform the immoralities and irregu¬ larities of their lives, and to bring them to an exter¬ nal behaviour, decent, honourable, and useful. An undertaking like this, while the inward temper is neglected, even when it may seem most effectual, will be but like painting the face of one who is ready 51 to die, or labouring to repair a ruinous house by plastering and adorning its walls, while its founda¬ tions are decayed. There is an awful passage in Ezekiel to this purpose, which I hope we shall often recollect: