/ 7 / / / i,' 7/v /£- 4 THEOLOGICAL SEMINAE-i, Princeton, N. J. Cllnc. Division. .s5Sj^rrj.. 4' '^'^'^''/' Section. 3/3 ^^- '- i* >^/ 'k X\i»V i^k^l SERMONS, PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, In the Year 1784, AT THE LECTURE iFounded by the Rev. Jo«n Bampton, M. A. late Canon of Sali/bury. TO WHICH IS NOW ADDED, A SERMON, Preached he/ore the University ^Oxford, July ^y "^l^^t On the Daty of attempting the Propagation of the Gospel among our Mahometan and Gentoo Subjedls in India. BY JOSEPH WHITE, B. D. t^EI-LOW OF WADHAM COLLEGEj ARCHBISHOP LAUD's PROFESSOR -OF ARABIC, AND ONE OF HIS MAJESTy's PREACHERS AT WHITEHALL. FIRST AMERICAN EDITION. PRINTED AT boston; BY WILLIAM GREENOUGH, FOR EBENEZER LARKIN, Jun. Bookseller ^ Stationer, No. 50, Cornbill. JMDCCXCIII, TO KIS GRACE JOHN MOORE, D. O. LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY: BY WHOSE ADVICE THE AUTHOR ORIGINALLY COMMENCED HIS ORIENTAL STUDIES ; AND UNDER WHOSE PATRONAGE HE HATH CONTINUED TO PURSUE THEM, THIS EDITION OF A WORK, THE RESULT OF THOSE STUDIES, IS RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED. BY HIS grace's MOST OBLIGED Al^ GRATEFUL SERVANT, J. WHITE. Extract from the loft Will and Tejlament of the late Rev. John Bampton, Canon of Sal ijhury, ' X GIVE and bequeath my Lands and Eftates to the Chancellor, Maflers, and Scholars of the Univerfity of Oxford forever, to have and to hold all jind fingular the faid Lands or Eftates upon truft, and to the intents and purpofes herein after mentioned ; that is to fay, I will and appoint, that the Vice Chan- cellor of the Univerfity of Oxford, for the time being, /hall take and receive all the rents, ilTues, and profits thereof ; and, after all taxes, reparations, and necef- fary deduftions made, that he pay all the remainder to the endowment of eight Divinity Ledure Sermons, to be eftablifned forever in the faid Univerfity, and to be performed in the manner following. *' I dired and appoint, that upon the firft Tuefday in Eafter Term, a Le£turer be yearly chofen by the Heads of Colleges only, and by no others, in the room adjoining to the Printing Houfe, between the hours of ten in the morning and two in the afternoon, to preach eight Divinity Lecture Sermons, the year following, at St. Mary's, in Oxford, between the commencement of the laft month in Lent Term, and. the end pf the third week in A61 Term. A3 «< Alfa VI " Alfo I direcl and appoint, that the eight Divinity Ledure Sermons fhall be preached upon cither of the following fubjects — to confirm and eftablifh the Chriflian Faith, and to confute all heretics and fchif- matics — upon the Divine authority of the Holy Scrip- tures — upon the authority of the writings of the primitive Fathers, as to the faith and praftice of the primitive Church — upon the Divinity of our Lord and Saviour Jefus Chrifl — upon the Divinity of the Holy Gholl — upon the Articles of the Chriftian Faith, as comprehended in the Apoflles ' and Nicene Creeds. " Alfo I direct that thirty cop;e3 of the eight Di- vinity Le£ture Sermons ihall be always printed, within two months after they are preached, and one copy Ihall be given to the Chancellor of the Univerfity, and one copy to the head of every College, and ojie copy to the Mayor of the city of Oxford, and one copy to be put into the Bodleian Library ; and the expenfe of print- ing them ihall be paid out of the revenue of the. Lands or Eflates given for eilablilliing the Divinity Ledure Sermons ; and the Preacher Ihall not be paid, nor be entitled to the revenue, before they are printed. " Alfo I direct and appoint, that no perfon fhall be qualified to preach the Divinity Ledure Sermons, unlefs he hath taken the degree of Mafter of Arts at leafl, in one of the two LTniverfities of Oxford or Cambridge ; and that the fume perfon fhall never, preach the Divinity Lecture Sermons twice/' HSOLOGI S E R M 'R I, MATTHEW XI. 19. WISDOM IS JUSTIFIED OF HER CHILDREN. T H E chapter in which thefe words oc« cur, opens with a concife relation of the Baptift's meffage to our Saviour ; which he fent, probably, not fo much to confirm his own couvi'^tion, as to gra- tify the pious curiofity, and to remove the modefl jcruples of his followers. Then follow the atteftation which cur Lord bore to the character of John, and his reflexions on the treatment each of them received from a race of men, whole jealoufy made them fuf, pect, and whofe perv^rfenefs difpofed them to count- eracl:, the beft methods that divine wifdom had adopt- ed for their reformation. A temper of mind fo defli^ tute of candor, fo incapable of folid improvement, fo predetermined to refiit the moil fiilutary confels of heaven, was elegantly compared to that wa,yward foL ly which is fom.etimes cbfervable in children, whofe obftinacy no correftions can control, and whofe fondnefs no condefcenfions can engage,^ If you pipe to them, they are too fullen to dance ; and if yon mourn to them, they are too gay to lament. The comparifon, though mortifying, was deferved : and that it might not lofe its aim, our Lord made a parr ticular application of it to the Jews, lie informed them, without a figure, that they were the perverf ^ children whom he had more immediately in view ; und that it was their infatuated perverfenefs, which*- ^e comparifon w;a.s defigned to illullrate and expofe 5 tbr S SERMON I. for fuch contrary ajjpearances did It afTume, that neither the exemplary aufterity of John, nor the more gracious famiharity of Chrifl himfelf, could either conquer its diflike, or conciliate its efteem. Did John lead an abflemious life, and fequefter himfelf from the cares and amidements of the world, as if purfuing a courfe which feemed mod favourable to the folemnity of his office, and which, as it removed him at a dillance from temptation, was likely to fliel- ter his character from the petulance of ridicule, and the malignity of reproach ? With what eyes did the Jews behold his conduft, and what interpretation did they put upon it ? By fuppofing that he was under daemoniacal influence,they thought fuch unreafonable and unnatural feverity could be eafily accounted for. They gazed, perhaps, fome with flupid admiration, and fome even with fecret contempt, at the rigour of her hermit ; but turned a deaf ear to the warnings of the preacher. Did our blelfed Lord adopt a mode of behaviour in fome refpecls different from the very auflere habits of the Baptift's life ? Did he poflefs more of the fo- cial qualities of human nature ? Was he more eafy of accefs, and did he with lefs appearance of reftraint converfe with mankind ? What effect had his amiable and condefcending manners on the very people, v/ho had been offended at the flrift felf denial which hh meffenger had voluntarily impofed on himfelf ? Were their prejudices vanquifhed ? Was their good opinion conciliated ? No. On the contrary, their perverfe humour was always predominant, v/hen their refor- mation was the object of the preacher : and in order to evade the end, they vilified the means. Thus they traduced our blelfed Lord as a glutton and a ivine bib'^ ber^ the friend of publicans andfinners. After thefe reflections on the inconfiftence of their judgmc;it, and the llubbornnefs of their difpofitions, particularly S E R M O K I. 9 particularly as dlfcovered againft himfeif, and the re- ligion which he came to eftablilh, he adds. But '•joif- dom is juji'ified of her children. As it he had faid, *' Though the generation to which I am lent to dif- clofe the firlt meflages of grace, is fo eager to mifm- terpret my dodlrines, and to cenfure my conduct ; yet there are thofe who v/ill readily bear their tefli- mony in my favour, from evidence too clear to be contradifted with effeft, or even to be doubted with propriety. The children of wifdom are placed in a lituation the moft aufpicious to convifliion : And if in proportion to their knowledge of its evidence, be iheir zeal in its fupport, and their concern for its in- terefts ; they will juflify it by their tellimony to fu- ture generations, againft the cavils of the unbelieving find amidil the perlecutions of the cruel.'* By the term ixnfdom in the text our bleflcd Lord meant, as fome fuppofe, himself ; who is in the higheft fenfe deferving of the appellation, as being the WORD and wisdom of God, in whom are hidden all the treafitres of knowledge ; and Vvho is the true light %vhicb lighteth every man that cometh into the 'world. Others are of opinion, that the expreiTion was meant to convey a fublime idea of the character ©f his gofpel : which is in truth the illuftration of di- vine wifdom, and contains the fyftem of that know- ledge, which can alone make us wife unto fahation. A gofpel fo divine in its original, fo excellent in its defign, and fo beneficial in its effects, appear a.'or- thy of all acceptation to many impartial inquirers, whofe conduct brought no difcredit on the caufe they ftood forward to defend. The children of wif- dom have, indeed, frequently juftified it by argu- ments too ftrong for its enemies to confute : and thoufands in the pains of death, and amidft the tor- tures of crucifixion, inftead of falling from the i^ith, have adhered tp it with farmer hopes, and fonder ai.r tachment j to SERMON!. tachment ; and breathed out their fouls in atteftationg to its truth, and in prayers for its profperirv. Nor has wifdom been denied the teftimonv even of enemies : a teftimony, of which, indeed, it did not fland in need ; but which, being extorted by the irrefiftible force of truth, may well be efleemed as a confirmation of its general evidence ; J:>ince they whole wii'h and whofe intereft it was to decry it, yet were compelled, if not to receiveit wholly, yet to ac- knowledge it in part ; and thus, like Pilate, they pro- nounced him righteous^ whom they condemned ; and, like Judas, eonfefl'ed him innocent, whom they betrayed. Though God, according to his pi-omife, has always had afeed toferve hi?n,\\'hizh mi'^t. be accounted as his pecidiar generation ; men who have confidered tlie fuccefs of religion as intimately connected with their own well being, and who have therefore promoted it with an ardour in fome degree proportioned to its importance ; yet to the primitive ages of chriflianity muft we turn our eyes for inftances of the moO: heroic fortitude, and the mofl difintereiled attachment. Other examples may illuflrate ; but thefe convince. Modern piety and zeal may edify and warm the heart ; may excite our emulation, and roufe up the languifli- ing fpirit of devotion. But the trials of ancient times produced examples at once fo inftru61:ive and fo. fplendid, that while the heart is affe6\ed, the con- fcience alfo is enhghtened. We are not carried away with fympathetic impulfes, which have no foundation but in the wild dreams of fanaticifm, or the tumultu- ous emotions of enthuhafm. No. The underiland- ing takes a fhare. in the impreffion: we approve while we wonder ; and our reafon is as much con- vinced by the evidence of truth, as our paflions are captivated by the power of what is fmgular and ex- traordinary. When S E R M O N I. u When we review the times in which fuch great (Examples occur, wc are led to make comparifons that are by no means flattering to ourfelves, and thole amon'^ whom we live. The charafteriflic feature of the prefcnt age, is indifierence to religion in general. The power of godlinefs is neglefted ; and ihall we {hen wonder that the form of it fhould be flighted und defpifed ? Under the pretence of emancipating the human mind from the bondage of fuperftition, the common offices of devotion have been decried. From the aiTeclion of candor we have funk into iiiU lefl'nefs ; and have tamely fuffered a daring fpirit of infidelity to oppofe, and a fpecious herefy to under- mine the interefts of chriilianity ; becaufe we have been apprehenfive that our flrmmefs would be fl:igmia- tized with the odious name of bigotry ! It has indeed been always the unhappy fate of man- kind to run into extremes : and in matters of reli- gion more cfpecially has this perverfe bent of human iiature difcovered itfelf. Lukewarmnefs and intemper- ate zeal have doubtlefs, each in its turn, proved inju- rious to the Chrifl:ian caufe. The former filently and iecretly faps its toundations ; and though its progrefs be flow and infenfible, yet its eifecls are too fatal ?.nd. too notorious not to alarm the friends of religion. The latter has expofed the caufe it profefled to patro- nize ; and by its prepoflierous methods of defence, bas,in inflances too numerous to be recounted, but too melancholy to be forgotten, afforded the enemJes that oppofed it an occaiion of fuch trium.ph, as the merits of their own caufe by no m.eans entitled them to claim. The children of wifdom,while-they feel their bet- ter hopes fecured by its promifes, cannot grow indil^ ferent to its interefts ; nor look on the infults which are from time to iime ofiered to its moil facred and ^wful t'biigadons, wiih the coldnefs of unconcerned fpeftator^v la S E R M O N L fpectators. They cannot fee its holy inftitutions flighted, or its eflential dodrines blafphemed, without lamenting that ahnoit unparalleled and portentous degeneracy of mind and manners which is the real fource of all we lament, and of all which we wifh to correct. They cannot but tremble at the probable, I will not fay approaching iffue of fuch ingratitude to heaven for its iinfpeakable gift. But the wifdom which they are taught to value, they know at the fame time how to defend. The fplrit which it infpires, isjirjlpure^ and then peaceable, gentle^ full of good fruits^ eafy to be entreated, witJjout partiality, and ^untboiit hypocrify. The children of wif- dom are therefore confiilcnt as well as fmcere : their candour does not make thern lukev/arm, nor their zeal uncharitable. The Epicureans of antiquity, and the infidels of our own days, arrogantly boall of their high atchieve- ments in fnapping afunder the chains of fuperitltion : and in the execution of their defperate purpofe they go forward with unfliaken fortitude, and' unremitted alacrity. Mufl we then grow fupine and inactive, when the danger is more imminent aqd more threat- ning ? Mufl we affeft the petty popularity, which arifes from flattering th^ prejudices of m.en, inflead of afpiring to the glory of faving their fouls ? Far be fuch complication of meannefs and perfidy from the children of wifdom. But the fmcere and wellinformed advocates of the gofpel, while engaged in the j unification of its prin- ciples, and the fupport of its interefts, are at the fame time careful not to lavifh their aftivity on fubjedls of remote effed, or barren curiofity.. Wifdom referves its vigour for exertions worthy of its own noble aims : and if it be zealoujly affc6led, it is in a gcod thing. Aftuated by fuch motives, and placed in fuch cir- cumftances, it not only defies ail the arts of calumny^ S E R M O N I. 25 Vat challenges fome tribute of pralfe. The everlaft- ing truths of the gofpel, with which the welfare of mankind is moft nearly connefted, demand our feri- ous re(j;ards, and jullify the warmed efforts of zeal, at once diredcd by knowledge, and tempered by phi- lanthropy. There are errors that would bereave us of every hope which points to immortality, loofen the beft ce- ment of fociety, and overturn the very conftitution of religion both natural and revealed. Oppofition to fuch errors deferves not the odious epithets of bigotry and fuperftition. Infidelity, we know, has its zealots ; and herefies of the moft malignant tendency have their advocates ; advocates, I mean, who fcorn ac- commodation with what they are pleafed to call the inventions of prieflcraft, and the prejudices of the vulgar : who make a triumphant boafl of the free- dom with which they oppofe the peculiar and diflin- guifhing doctrines of chriftianity ; who are neither afhamed, nor afi-aid to declare openly to the world, .that as they have hitherto exerted themfelves, fo wilt they continue to exert themfelves In demolifhing the fortreifes of orthodoxy. Thefe hardy and heroic ciiarapions of reformation difdain to pay any rever- ence to the ruft of antiquity — they are no refpefters of the authority attached to names — thev fcorn to fa— crifice any precarious opinion about the purity of truth, to the eftablidied peace of the world. The collective wifdom and exemplary piety of preceding generations, are to the philofophcr a ftumbling block, and to the innovator fooliflmefs. In reprefTmg the violence, and in expofmg the ab- furditles of fuch writers, we aft a part which preju- diced men may perhaps impute to unworthy motives. But why then are we blamed for doing to others, what others, if they fuppofed us to lie under any dan- gerous delufion, v/ould make a merit of doing to us ? Is ^4 S E R M O N L Ir> that ofiiclous in the children of wifdom, which irii their adverfaries is benevolent ? Is their firmnefs our obftinacy ? Their caufe furely has no prefumptive proof of fuperiority. Their abilities are not of a greater fize. Their a£livity is not directed to nobler ends. They laugh indeed at our blindnefs, and they rail at our ardour : but to hear the rude clamours of thofe who aifault chriftianity, or of thofe who betray it, without emorion and without refiftance,- "vvculd imply a tamenefs of fpirit, which our enemies would be the firfl to infult and to ridicule. By filent forbearance, or languid oppofition, we fliould indeed give too much colour to an infuiuation lately thrown out by one who has rufhed foremoft in the ranks, and ibunded with a louder blaft than his fellows the horn of battlcj that v/e are at cafe in Z/on, only becaufe we are grown indifferent to her better interefts. There are indeed too many perfons, from whom a rhore confident condu6; might have been expefted, who are aclive in the profecution of thofe temporal privileges, which are connected with their fpi ritual function, and who eagerly pant for honours and dif- tinclions ; yet are too little concerned to promote the _ honour of the gofpel, and quite indifferent about the prefervatlon of thofe glorious truths, which render it at once the admiration and dehght of rational but' guilty and fallen creatures. But it is unfair to argue from particulars to univer- fals ; and ungenerous to cenfure the whole for the defects or errors of a few. Many there are, whofe cC)ndu6l ftill tends to refcue their profeflion from the difgrace which malice is eager to throw on it. Wif- dom can vet boaft of children, whofe mingled zeal and prudence do not difgrace the caufe they have the honour to fupport. Hence their zeal for God never contradicls their chanty to men. While it oppofes principles ' S E R M O N L T^ principles wliich are injurious to the interefls of truth, nnd deilruttive to the fouls of men, yet it diminilhes not the fnicereft regard for the perfons of thofe, by whom fuch principles are adopted. It loves the man^ it efleems the fchoiar, it applauds the believer, even while it faithfully chaflens his guilt, or freely admon* iflies him of his error. There is fome difficulty, doubtlefs, in fixing by precept the boundaries of that zeal, with which Chrifliaii;^ in general, and the minifters of the gofpel in particular, ought to be infpired : But example will at once unfold the principle of zeal as a quality, and enforce the obligation of it as a duty. In the conduct of St. Paul we fee this virtue well illuftrated ; and we may mofl becomingly, and mod profitably, contem- plate it as a model of imitation. The principal objefl: this illuflrious child of wif^ Gorn had in view, was the glory of God : and this he was convinced, could only be properly and efFe(^ualljr promoted by iteadinefs and prudence in maintaining the great truths of the gofpel. To an obje6t fo mo- mentous, he facrificed all that the world call dear ; his eafc, his interelt, his reputation, yea even life itielf. No fundamental do6:rines did he obfcure by partial fuppreliion, or refine away by fophifiical inter- pretation : he taught them, as he received them from above. He fcorned to temporize, when his commif- fion was clear, and the object of high and indubitable importance. In matters of little coniequence he a£led with difcretlon ; but it was a difcretion which the flrifteft integrity warranted, which the frailties, or the prepoirellions of his hearers required, nay, which the higher interefls of the church itfelf loudly and unequivocally demanded. Wq have a very animated defcrlption of his noble and honefl zeal in the necefi'ary oppofition which he made to the f^lfo, teachers, who had infidioufly en- deavoured. i6 S £ R M O N I. deavoured, by hypocritical {hews of a purer and more ancient dodrine, to corrupt and pervert the Galatian church. Fdlfe brethren, fays he, unawares brought in, tuho came privily tofpy out our liberty which ive have in Chri/l yejus, that they might bring us into bondage to *ivhom we gave place byfubjedion, no not for an hour ; that the truth of the gofpel might continue vuith you* Thus the apoflle exemplified his own pofition — that h: could do nothing againjl the truth — either negatively, or pof- itively ; either by oppofmg it himfelf, or by tamely acquiefcing in the oppofition of its enemies. All truths are not of equal moment, or fupported by evidence equally clear : in matters of a doubtful nature, conceflion therefore is ultimately of more ad- vantage to the interefls of truth, than contention* We fiiould, however, be careful what points we affign to the clafs of dubious and unimportant controverfy. They who call upon us to conclude, are, indeed, more clear in pointing out where conceflion is to be- gin, than where it is to end. If we mud recede from well founded and long eftabliflied opinions by way of accommodation, why not give way in fome points of practice which have been rendered familiar by cuf*- torn, and which bear on them the venerable (lamp of ancient prefcription. If loud complaints and bitter accufatlons could evince the necefllty of areform, the church of England is not only ignorant of the pecul- iar doftrines which diilinguilh Chriftianity, but grofly defeclive in the difcharge even of its moral duties. Thus fome have told us, that we fhall never convert the unbeliever, till we indifcriminately and avowedly abandon thofe doctrines which are called myfterious : and of late one daring adventurer in the field of ref- ormation, has thrown afide the common reftraints of modefliy, and with an effrontery equally fmgular and infulting, has informed the Chriftian world, that there is * G.-vU. H. 4. 5. SERMON L 17 ' IS no profpect of converting the Mahometans, unlefs they have a fandion from the church to continue in the praftice of polygamy ? * Amidft the claimants to the privileges of truth, \vho are to be gratified ? Amidfl: the various projec- itors of reformation, whofe plans are to be adopted ? Many fet up pretenfions to exclufive preference : all afiert their right of being coolly and impartially heard. Let therefore all be heard: though in the mafs of human opinions, and amidft the confli£b of human pafiions, all cannot be fatisfied. There is a fpirit which feenis to be always difcon- tented, till its wiideft claims are allowed ; and which having been turbulent under injudicious reftraint, be- comes tyrannical when in pofleflion of ufurped author- ity. But let not the freedom of inquiry be Ihackled. For if it multiplies contentions among the wife and virtuous, it exercifes the charity of thofe who contend. If it ihakes, for a time, the belief which is reded only upon prejudice, it finally fettles it on the broader and more folid bafis of cbnviftion. Truth affuredly has nothing to fear from the oppo- fition of its enemies : and the children of wifdom are not to be feduced fi-cm their perfuafion of its excel- lence, by the fubtlety of the fcphifh, or the calumnies of the fcofier. They know that its origin is from above ; and that an almighty arm protefts and fecures it. Thev do indeed deplore that malignity of heart, and that blindnefs of underftanding, which too fre- quently appear in the defigns of its Various adverfar- ies, either to pervert its principles, or to obftruft its genuine influence : yet they have too much refpect for their caufe, to dif^race it bv the bafe and unnat- ural aid of perfecution ; and they have too much con- fidence in their own ftrength, to flirink from a contefl in ; .* The'.ypiithora, vol. ii. p. 85, &.c. B iS S E R M O N I. in which the triumphs of error are precarious and tranfitory. They are convinced that the weapons of ChriRian warfare are not carnal ^ hut fpirhual ; and that our re- ligion, though protected by human power againfl vi- olence and outrage, for the fake of prefcrving its members in peace, yet Is to make its way in the world only by the force of evidence ; and to keep its ground as well by the moderation, as by the abilities of its advocates. Confcious of the difficulties in which the moral governour of the univerfe feems to have left many interefting topics, refleding on the different degrees of vigour which belong to different underftandings, and fenfible of the various lights in which the fame queftion prefents itfelf in various circumftances, the friend of truth is more ready to inquire than to dog- matize, and to inform than to condemn. There is an oppofition which he confiders as of a more enlight ened and liberal kind ; which is conducted with tem- per and decency ; which has not for its objeO: thofe licentious and immoral views which have been juftly charged upon the more popular fyllems of infidelity j and which, inftead of proving injurious to the great caufe it attacks,- will be eventually the means of con- firming its authority, and of illuflrating its principles. Such oppofition excites a keener attention not only among the adverfaries, but the friends of the gofpel. It brings forward into open day thofe evidences, whicfi are dimly and indiftinctly perceived by both. It clears them from every ufelefs incumbrance, which tends to obfcure their luftre. It confirms and fanQifies the faith of the Chriflian ; it humbles the arrogance, where it cannot overcome the prtpoffefrions, of the in- fidel : the inquifitive are inflruded ; and the impar- tial are completely and unalterably convinced. Among S E R M O N L 19 . Among the teachers of the Chriftian religion, it is unqueftionably a duty, to ftudy its evidences with fuch care, and to examine its principles with fuch integrity, iis to be able alzvays to give a reafon of the hope that is in them. But there are other obligations alfo attending the clerical profefiion, of more immediate concern, than the mere office of repeUing hoftile objections, or even of removing the fmcere, but painful fcruples of our neighbour. From the natural modefly of their difpofitions, or perhaps from the want of opportunity to coiled ma- terials for the purpofes of publications, many excel- lent men are contented with retaining their own faith in filence and obfcurlty ; and with diffufmg the fav- ing truths of the gofpel only among thofe w^ho are committed to their charge. There is therefore a fmgular propriety in inftitu- tions of this kind : and it cannot be denied, that in confequence of them much has been added to the general ftock of learning, and ftill more to the eluci- dation of the particular evidences of natural and re- vealed religion. Men of extenfive knowledge and folid judgment have by thefe means been called forth to publlck view, at a time when raillery might have difcQuraged the modeil ; and when the moft fanguine might have defpaired of viftory, fi-om the number rather than the talents, of thofe \yho were leagued together in the fupport of impiety. They have been roufed by the call of pious and munificent patrons, to {land forth as the champions of truth, virtue and religion. Their abilities have excited the general veneration of the v%'orld : their candour has extorted praife even from their hardiell antagonifts : and by their fuccefs in explaining and defending the doftrines of revelation, the wifdom of the founders has been amply juftif-ed, and their generofity abundantly rec- ompenfed by that v/hich they would have themfelves B 2 efleemed 10 S E R M O N I, adeemed the nobleft of all rewards, the fair and fifiat eflabhfhment of evangelical truth. Thus the abfurdity of atheiim has been expofed ; and the atheill driven from the field he had the pre- fumption to call his own, even by the very weapons which he chofe for his defence. Delfm in all its forms has been examined and deteded : all its illib- eral cavils have been replied to ; all its haughty pre- tenfions confounded ; and even the pertinent and momentous objedions, to which the bell informed, and bell difpofed of its advocates fometimes had re- courfe, have been weighed with impartiality, and re- futed by argument. Thole tenets, which rafh and fuperficial inquirers had fuppofed to be deflitute of foundation, ha-ve been expreil'ed with greater precifion, fupported by ftronger proofs, and recommended by nev/ illultrations. Our own church, more efpecially has alTerted with j'ufl r-nd growing confidence, her fuperiority over all other eftablifhments. She has been enabled to refill the unkind and unfair aiTaults that have been made againfi: her doftrines. She has feen in her friends a conflant increafe of that found knowledge, which ever draws onward in its train an increafe of good morals. The children of wifdom thus going on from llrength to ftrength, are not io be deterred from the profecu- tion of their refearches, or the avovrai of their fenti- ments, by illiberal infmuation, or audacious Inve£live. While ihey fcdrch all things, they held faji that ivhich is good. They are not difmayed by groundlefs and vul- gar imputations of indulging a fpirlt of real bigotry, and of contending for the credit of imaginary ortho-- doxy. Their ta& is arduous ; their intentions are honourable ; and in every conteft where they have hitlierto been oppofed, they may juftiy boafl of having bseamore than conquerors in the day of trial. Gbjeclion.^ S E R M O N I. 2j Objections which, from their minutenefs, might Ctherwife have been neglefted, have now received the mofl fatisfaclory anfwers : and doubts, which from their obfcurity, or from the modelty of thofe in whofe minds they arofe, might have remained unrelolved, have been openly examined, and fairly removed. In -fliort, every part of the great fabric of religion, has received fome diflinft fupport or illuftration, which has added to the ftrength and beauty of the whole jyiteni. But thefe inflitutibns, falutary as they may have been to the caufe of chriftianity, and propitious to the interefls of fcience, have not been totally exempt froii; objedion. As every fubjeft of human fpeculation is bounded by fome limits, additional proofs, and even additional illuftrations, cannot always be expe£ted : and inftitu- tions which require the unremitted attention of the mind, and the application of learning and argument to the fame fubjecls, may be fufpeded rather of adding to the quantity, than to the real ufes of fpeculation ; and of promoting more an anxiety fornovei opinions than a ferious concern for eftablifhed truths. Though the earlier periods of thefe inftitutions, therefore, have been dillinguifhed by a more than ordinary dif- play of erudition, and their utility is become as con- Ipicuous as the abilities which fupported them ; yet genius itfelf will languifh, when confined to one track, nor will learning be able to recruit its vigour, when it finds that its (lores have been made com_mon to others. In this cafe we have much to apprehend from the indolent, and, perhaps, ftill more from, the vain. With the former the caufe v/ill be v/eakened by dul- nefsand infipidity ; with the latter it will be pervert- ed by the luft of noveltv. The indolent dcfparinp- of makmg any valuable addition to the proofs, or gene-\ ;fal illuftrations of religion, will content themfelve^' 22 S E R M O N I. with the fame track that others have purfued, and be fatisfied with the negative merit of faying nothing amifs. The vain will have recourfe to fancy, to fup- ply the want of more folid matter ; and will give Icope to airy fpeculation, in order to have the credit of advancing fomething fmgular. It cannot therefore be expected that on the fame fubjcfts of difcuilion, and thofe fubjeds circumfcrib- ed by very narrow limits, the progrefs fliould be as fplended as the commencement : and to thofe who are adverfe, or even indifferent to the caufe of relig- ion, it may afford fome little matter of triumph, or feme flight ground for fceptical infmuation, that on fubjecls of fuch unequaled moment, fo little of what is captivating by the mere charms of novelty, is pro- duced by the mofl ccmprehenfive refearch, and the . moll elaborate explanation. The objedion, however, is of no weight, v»-hen duly confidered. Religion is, like its author, unchange- able. The reafons which fupport it are as old as it- felf : and though its proofs may be fet in a new light, yet the proofs themfelves cannot be new. To the ^word of God it were prefumption to add ; it is our duty to take nothing from it ; and in thefe circum- flances wl^atever doftrine profeffes to be at once ef- fential to be known, and yet hitherto unknown, may in confequence of fuch profeffion, be fufpc£led of dan- gerous miilake. But the wifdom of our Founder has been as con- fpicuous as his liberality. The plan v/hich he has adopted, is extenfive and various ; it gives Icope to philofophicai and hiftorical inquiry ; and to thofe v/ho unite the love of virtue with curiofity, it will be A fource of perpetual information. The connexion betv>'een facred and profane learning, and the con- fidence of true religion vath true philofophy, are by repeated exneriments now decided. Whiitevcr - SERMON I. 23 Whatever fcience therefore fhall inveftigate, may here be purfued, as far as the caufe of religion can re- ceive any illuftration from it. Polite literature may here open its nobleil ftores ; and criticifm apply them to the elucidation of obfcure palTages, and to the eflablidiment of fundamental truths. From the corruptions which grow out of excef- five civilization, and from the mifchiefs which attend the improper and indifcriminate fondnefs that per- vades all ranks of men for philofophical fubjecls,we have little reafon to fuppofe that the period will foon arrive, in which no additional objeftions (hall be brought againit the evidence, or the doctrines of the gofpel. Here then, it is to be hoped, fuch anfwers will always be produced, as will be fufFicient to counteracl their influence, and to expofe their fu-. tility. But while this inftitutlon is directed to the general object of defending and eftablifhing thechriflian faith ; and on that account poifefles, in common with other fimilar inftitutions which preceded it, the fame gene- ral utility ; it has alfo the fuperior advantage of blending together whatever was peculiar and appro-r priate to them, and of uniting all their excellencies in itfelf. It is indeed principally defigned to countera£i: the progrefs of error in all its forms, and of infidelity un- der every mode of oppofition. As fuch, the object is of fupreme importance, and opens an extenfive field for fpeculation. The fources of error are inexhaufli-i ble : and whilll either vanity or vice influences m.an- kind, it will be eafy for fophiftry to invent new forms of objedion ; while profligacy vidU be ever difpofed to difcredit the faith that condemns it. We may flatter ourfelves, however, with this hope, that as much ingenuity will be ihewn in the defence of our fp.ith, ii3 can be exerted in oppofuig it j and that while the; enemy 24 S E R M O N I. enemy is fowing tares, the chriftian hufbandman will not be lels vigilant in cultivating the good iced. Hitherto, indeed, infidelity has not been able to. atchieve any thing which may recompence theadliv- ity, or gratify the vanity of its advocates. Ihey have fuccefsfuily employed the arts of converfion with the churhfh mifanthrope, who would aflimilate the character of the Deity to the dark and unamiable complexion of his own ; with the raw and conceited tripling, who difdains to tread in the beaten track of opinion ; or with the obdurate libertine, whq is in- terefted in v/eakening the fanctions, and difproving the very eiciflence, of a law by which he ftands con- demned. But have the virtuous and the wife, have nienofthe higheft rank in literature, or of the mo(t refpcftabie reputations in fociety, gone over to their party ? We do not envy them the paltry pittance of glory which they can acquire from the number of converts, who lov3 darkncfi rather than lights hccaiife their deeds are evil : but we are mofl; fmcerely anxious for the fake of other men, to refcue them from the baneful and fpecious allurements of opinions, which will cither drav/ theni afide to vice, or prevent their return to virtue, once neglefted and deferted. Our religion, however, is not itfelf tarnifhed by the corruptions of thofe who wantonly abandon, or ma- lignantly revile it. The fame caufe, we are aware, will always produce the fam.e efteft : and while the gofpcl continues to inculcate a pure doctrine, it muft expeft a very unwelcome reception from tl;e corrupt pallions of mankind. But while we juftify the ways of God, we mean not to fpeak with undiilinguifhing contempi, or with unrelenting afperity, of every man by whom they have been arranged.' In fome of thofe who look upon the gofpel with an unfriendly eye, we readily acknowL S E R M O N I. 35 pdge, and, under any other circumftances, we fhould warmly admire, very Ihining abilides. They have attacked our citadel by every inllrument of violence, and with every ilratagem of art. Oar antagonifls have Ibmetimcs alTailed it with declamatory eloquence and fometimes undermined it with the aid of meta- phyfical fubtlety : but the church of Chrill is, we experimentally know, deeply and firmly founded on a rock : and the blails of oppofition, however fudden and however impetuous, are infufficient to overthrow it. Yet difpofed, as we are, to do juilice to the talents of thofe who differ from us ; and compelled, as we are, to lament the fad perverfion of them, we refill with indignation, the difmgenuous and haughty pre- tenfions which they put up to eminent fuperiority of learning and to peculiar liberality of fentiment. We know, in fafl:, that our rehgion has been fmcerely be- lieved, and ftrenuoufiy defended, by men who have afcended the fummit of human knowledge by the vigour of their genius, and the intenfenefs of their iippiicaticn. Locke and Malbranche do not yield the palm of metaphyfical acutenefs to the fullen fophiftry of Hob- bes, or the cold fcepticifm of Hume. In brilliancy of imagination and delicacy of tafte, Berkeley is, fure- ly, not inferior to ShaftefDury. In folid and mafcu- line fenfe, and in erudition claflical or philofophical, who are the champions of infidelity that deferve to be compared with a Taylor, a Wilkins, a Cudworth, a Barrow, a Clark, a Boyle, and a Newton ? And what we may boldly afk, what is there in the nature of things themfelves, that acutenefs of pene- tration and juihiefs of reafoning fiiould be exclufively .poifeffed by thofe who deride chriifianit)', or by thofe vho corrupt it ? If 26 S E R M O N I. If great and good men yet adhere to our party, when they may, upon conviction delert it, without danger and without infamy, a flrong prefumtion arifes, that the caufe of rehgioiis wifdom has been ably and fuc- ccfsfully pleaded by her children. We have indeed ever been ready to meet our an- tagonifhs on any lair ground of difputation. We are not afraid of coming to the teil of ihiilory, and of crit- icifm ; of ethics, where they are found ; and of me- taphyfics, where they are intelligible. We decline the ufeof no weapons that are honourable : at the fame tim.e we wiih not to be indebted for our tri- umphs, to the pointed fliaft of ridicule, or. to the poi- fonous arts of infmuation. But v/hile v/e profefledly ourfelves difdain to ufe fuch modes of defence, v/e are not terrified at the eagernefs with vv'hich other msn employ them. There is a providence which controls all human events, and brings good out of evil : and it is this providence which feems to have permitted the attacks of infidelity, in order to give greater evidence to the faith it oppofes. It is not necellary, in the prefent fituation of things, to attempt any new arrangement of proofs or fyftem of evidence. It will be time enough to invent fome frefh modes of demonllration, when it is found that the old are incapable of affording convidtion to the honefl and impartial inquirer after truth. The nature of evidence, however, depends in a great meafare on the manner in which it is confidcr- ed ; and the fame arguments and illuftrations will appear in very different lights of llrength and convic- tion, according to our various modes of fiudy and liabils of reficclion. If therefore I prefume not, in the following dif- courfes to produce any teflimonies unheard of or ar- guments hitherto unknown, in fupport of our faith ; yet ■ S E R M O N L £7 yet I hope I Ihali be entitled to your indulgence, if I in feme degree devi-iite from the more common track of fpeculation, and apply my attention to a fpecies of difcuflion, which has, perhaps from the remotenefs of that fort of learning on which it depends, been handled with lefs minutenefs of inveiligation than its importance feems to demand. It may be prefumed, that thofe topics are befl: un- der flood by us, to which we have devoted the greateft fhare of application. On this ground I may flatter myfelf with the hopes of your candid attention, w^hile I am mere immediately treating thofe fubje£ts, to which the courfe of fludies purfued from my own choice, and the nature of an academical employment conferred by your kindnefs, have pointed my inquiries —■in qiibiamen ego qiiideniti^ aitt quid efficere poJJi?n^ ?naIo in aitoritm fpe rcHnquere, quam in oratione ponere 7nea* The great fcene of revelation has been the East. There the fource of genuine infpiration was firft opened : and from thence the fireams of divine knowledge began to flow. It was the grand theatre, on which the Almighty governor, of the world 7nade bare his ann^ and by ftgiis andiuonders^ and mighty deeds eflablillied the convidion of his righteous providence and fupreme dominion in the hearts of men. There he led the people of Ifrael like a flock, by the hand of Mofes and Aaron : there the Prophets uttered their predictions : and there the Son of God illullrated and fulfilled them. But there alfo has the impoflor Mahoment erecled his ilandard — that flandard to which thoufands hav-c ilocked, w ith an ardour that may mtII raife a blufh on the countenances of too many, who pretend to fight under the banner of the crofs. Whofoever, therefore, has bent his attention to the purfuits of oriental literature, and the fludy of eaflern * Cicero, Orat. ia Qn. Cxciliuin. c8 S . E R M O N L eaftern hiftory, miifl be deeply imprefled with tlm peculiar and diftinguifhing circumltance of Afiatic hiftory : and he will unavoidably form fome com- parifons between thofe two great fources of religious ppinion. From the climes which he reviews have fprung thofe powerful fyftems, v/hich have fpread themfelves over the moll enlightened portion of the globe ; and which for ages have determined the be- lief, and influenced the conduce of the greateft nati- ons which inhabit it. Beginning equal jy in filence and obfcurity, they have advanced to a dominion equally unknown in any former age : but widely tlirferent in the caufes by which their fuccels has been produced, and in the principles cii which their au- thority is founded ; they call the attention of philo- fophy to the inveftigation of their hiftory, as to the fublimefl objeft, 'vvhich can interelt the curious, or employ the profound. Whether they be confidered as the fource.^ of re- ligious belief, and as thus agitating in. the mioft pow- erful manner the hopes and fears of mankind ; or as the principles which have influenced the revolutions of nations, and thus including the caufes of the moft memorable events in human hiftory, they f tand forth as the moil brilliant fubjefts of religious and pohti- cal fpeculation, and claim the bell exertions of phi- lofophical fagacity. Amidft fcenes lb ftriking and fo eventful, the ftu^ dent of oriental literature cannot remain unmoved. Whatever knowledge he may have acquired, what- ever judgment he may polTefs, mufl be ufefully laid out in comparing thofe two great feels w^hich thus di- vide mankind, and in coUecling from deep and im- partial inquiry the marks of true and falfe infpiration. In purfuit of refcarches, ftretched through fo large an extent, and which embrace fo many important ob- jcds, he will probably be led to confidcr thefe two. religion; 3 E R M O N t S§ religions in their Hiftory, their Evidence, and theif Efteds ; as the three great Iburccs of comparifon, by which their truth is to be determined. He will begin, therefore, by examining the fitua- tion of the world at the refped^ive periods when their authors appeared : and from this inveftigation he will with certainty infer, what can be alligned to the wifdom of heaven, and what to the policy of men. He will then weigh in the balance of ealm and un- prejudiced reafon the evidence upon which they reit their claims ; and endeavour by thefe means to fix the criteria of real and pretended revelation. He will clofe his inquiries by confidering their ef- fefts upon mankind, whether as individuals, or nati- ons : for from the tendency of a religion to promote the prefent happinefs of men, w^e may determine the probabiUty of its connexion with their future in- terefts. In this manner it is probable that he will be able to afcertain the nature and charader of thefe re- fpeflive fyftems better than in the more inartificial! method oi detached and defultory inquiry. For, doubtlefs, in proportion to the variety and magnitude of thofe circumJtances in which either fyflem is feen to be farther removed from the v/iJd ftratagems a de- ceiver would employ, and the hafe ends he would pur- fue ; in proportion as it approaches nearer to the idea of fuch a religion as the divine being, v*'ho ads for the beftpurpofesbythebercnieans, maybefuppofed tocom- municate to mankind ; in that exad proportion will its claims be authenticated and its evidence confirmed. It is to this great fubject of difcuffion that 1 prefumc to call the attention of the audience I now addrefs ; and I do not know that it is within the compafs of my information to bring any more ufeful or more proper oiTering to the truth of our faith, than the re- fult of thofe inquiries v/hich my fituation and profef- fion have enabkd me to make. I purpofe therefore to 5^ SERMON I. to confider, in their moft important points of view, the charafters of Mahometifm and Chriftianity ; and the nature of their refpeclive pretenfions to a divine origin. Nothing, furcly, is fo likely to attrad the attention of fcholars to eadern literature, as the fplended fcene of Afiatic hiftory which is here prefented to them • and the important treafures of religious, of political, and of philofophical information which it contains. We rejoice in the progrefs of every ftudy, which conncfts the various materials of knowledge by new ties, divcrfifies them by new combinations, and en- larges the views of the contemplative and pious be- liever. We feel a growing confidence in our caufe, from the conviftion, that the farther fuch inquiries are purfued, and the more fuch information, as may facilitate them, is collected, the more firmly will the truth of our faith be eftablifhed ; and the more mag- nificent views will it unfold to us of the connexion in which chriftianity ft.ands with the temporal and eter- nal welfare of mankind. SERMON SERMON II. ACTS V. 38, 39. IF THIS COUN'SEt, OR THIS WORK, BE OF MEN, IT WILL COMi TO NOUGHT : BUT IF IT BE OF GOD, YE CANNOT OVERTHROW IT. HP X H E miraculous propagation and final eftablifhrnentofchrillianity, the triumphs it has ob- tained over obftacles the moil formidable, and the ef- fe&s it has produced by inilruments in appearance the moflinadequate, have frequently been urged, as de> cifive proofs of its divinity and truth. In fupport of this argument the words now before us, which contain the famous maxim of Gamaliel, in his advice to the Jewifn councilj are fometimes ad- duced. But with whatever propriety the text may be applied to the particular cafe of chrifiianity, the general principle is not to be admitted, without many exa£t and interefting diilinciions. Succefs alone is imdoubtedly no certain criterioa of the truth and divinity of any religious fyflem ; no abfolute proof of the concurrence and approbation of heaven. For, is it not evident, that God permits er- ror to prevail in the world, nay fometimes to a great- er extent than the truth itfelf ? The faft we cannot difpute, where we are utterly unable to affign the fi- nal caufe. The etlicient caufes do indeed fometimes lie open to our view. They are to be found in the nature and condition of man ; they do not clafh with the moral attributes of the Deity ; and they fupply abundarxt matter as v/ell to gratify cur curiofity, as to fubdue our pride, God 52 SERMON II. God has conflituted us free agents, and has en- dued us with faculties, 'U'hich though fulhcient, if pro- perly exerted, to lead us into the difcovery of truths are itill limited and circumfcribcd. We are there- fore fallible creatures, liable to be impofed upon either by the delufions of our own imaginations, or by the artifices of interefhed impoflors. Unqualified for deep fpeculation and laborious refearch, the great bulk of mankind is oftener directed by fancy, by pre- judice, or intercft, than by reafon. I-Jence it hap- pens, that mifled by the craft and cunning of thofe \vho He in wait to deceive, or feduced by doftrines flattering and agreeable to the corruption of the hu- man hart, numbers in all ages forfaking the truth, have embraced with vvillingnefs, and propagated with zeal, the groffeft and moft pernicious miftakes. If our own experience fhouldbe infufnclent to con* vincc us of thefe fads, the hiftory of pail ages will teach us by melancholy examples, how extenfive an influence error has often been permitted to obtain over the minds of men. Even from the eariieft ages of the world, down to that glorious sera when the fun of righteoufnefs arofe to give light to them that fat in darkncfs and the fhadow of death, it pjeafed the di- vine Providence to fuffer the far greater part of man- kind to lie in the darkeft ignorance, v/i:h regard to the grand fundamental principles of all religion. The worfliip, and I had almolb faid, the knowledge of the one true God, were throi»gh various revolu- tions of empires, and amidft various m^odcs of life, confined within the narrow Hmits of Judsca. And even among the peculiar people, which had been fepa- rated from the nations by an extraordinary adl of di- vine Providence for the exprefs purpofe of preferving this knowledge pure and untainted, the baleful in- fluence of error v/as too often felt. The honours due only to the great Creator, were unworthily transferred S E R M d N ii. 33 'fransferred to the creaturis : the altars of Jehovah be- came the feats df fupei (tition and idolatry. In the days of * Ahab, there remaineLi onWfeven thoufandin Jfrael, ivho had not boived the knee to Baal : and under the impious Jeroboam, while ten tribes followed the f^odi of Dan and Bethel, two only continued to wor- fliip the Lord at jerufalem. Inftances have never been wanting of men, who from motives of interefc, or for the acqnifilion of power, have pretended to hold immediate conveffe with the Deity ; and whofe pretences, from the fa'ga- cious artifices of the teacher, or the abjeft credulity of the people, have been crowmed with fuccefs. Rome furnifned a Numa, who gave the highi^fl fanftion and authority to the dictates of human pru- dence and policy, by delivering them to his fubjefts as the exprefs revelations of the immortal gods : and thus firmly effablifhed a fyflem, which with fome fubfequent additions, remained entire through the va- rious revolutions of the Roman commonwealth ; till at length the rehgion of Chrifl triumphed over Poly- theifm, and the banner of the crofs was ercfted on the ruins of the capitol. Nor did the introiui':"tion of chriftlanlty into the world prodiice any alteration, at leaft: in this re- f^e£l:, in the manner of God's dealings with mankind. Even v/hen it pleafed him to employ extraordinary means for an extraordinary end, and to propagate the truth by aids to which the advocates of falfehodd Could not' have recourfe, he ftill dealt with men as ■ with free and rational creatures. They were fliil left at liberty either to embrace or reiecl what be had revealed : and by fome it was aftually fo far refilled, as to draw do\\>n the iuft judgment of infatuation a« a punilhment for fuch refiflancc. T^- - ■■ it with the ' *■ I Kings xJT. i!?. c 34 SERMON II. the Pharifees, * whofe eyes he blinded, and whofe hearts he hardened, Icji they Jhoidd fee ivith their eyes, and un* derjiand ivith their hearts, and be converted. E\eT\ the final eftablifliment of the golpel did not totally extirpate error and delufion from the world. Tares were ftill permitted to fpring up, and fome- times even to choak the good feed. The hiltory of the earlier ages of chriflianity is little more than a melancholy recital of fucceliive herefies and abfur- dities ; fome of which were either plucked up by the hand of reformation, or left to wither of themfelves ; while others taking deep root, were fufi'ered to flour- i(h a long time, and almoll to overlhadow the church. But let not the excellency of chriftianity be depre- ciated, becaufe it failed to do what could not be done, without violence to the whole intelleftual and moral conftitution of its profeffbrs : let not the veracity of its author be impeached, becaufe his followers have rufhed headlong into thofe erroneous and impious opinions, which he has himfelf moft explicity fore- told, and moll pointedly condemned. ^^ Take heed, fays he, that no man deceive you : for many fhall come in my name, faying, lam Chrifl, and fhall deceive many.'— \ For their fhall arife falfe Chri/is and f a If c prophets, and fhall fljew grcatfigns and ivondcrs, ivfomuch thdt if it were pojfiblc, they fhall deceive the very eled. Thus he fortold ; and the event juftified the pre- didion. But among all the inftances of audacious and fuc- cefsful impollure, which hiftory has recorded, none has been more widely diffufed, or more firmly eilab- iifhed, than that of the pretended prophet of Arabia. Born in an obfcure and uncivilized country, entitled to no pre eminence of power or authority, the grand impofcor, by the mere force of a bold and fertile genius, • J©hn xil. 40, 41, f Matt. xniv. 4, 5. J lb. 24. SERMON n. 35. genius, aiTifled by a concurrence of circumftances univerfally aufpicious to his defign, was enabled to obtain the mofl unbounded empire over the minds as well as perfons of a very large portion of mankind ; and together v/ith a temporal kingdom, to introduce nnd fix a religion, Avhich has fublilled in almolt un- diminiihed vigour to the preient times, through the long period of more than 1 100 years. The rapid propagation of Mahometifm, and the brilliant viftories of its Founder, have frequently been urged by his followers as the exprefs teftimo- nies of heaven to the truth and holinefs of their reli- gion : to this argument divines of the Romifli Com- munion * have given too much countenance, by re- prefenting amplitude, duration, and temporal profpe- rity among the charafterilfic and infallible marks of the true church. But furely that can be no argu- ment in favour of any fyftem, v/hich might equally be aiiedged by all ; and which the follower of Numa, and the difcipie of Tvlahomet, no lefs than the Chrifl- ian, have in reality pleaded as proofs of a divine ori- ginal in their refpeftive religions. It appears then, as well from experience that error often does, as from the nature and confritution of man that it fom.etime3 mull: prevail in the world ; and confequently that the eltablifliment of any reli- gious fyftem when confidered by itfelf, determines nothing with regard to the truth of its dod'rines, or the fuperior authority of its fanftions. What is un- common, mufl not be confounded with what is fu- pernatural : what can be accounted for by human, means, muff not be haftily and indifcriminately af- cribed to divine. Succefs, which is not only compat- i'ble with the exiftence of a revelation immediately proceeding from God, but even infeparabie from it in cur ideas, mufl not be infilled upon as diredly and C 2 properly • Sec Bellara. de Nous EccieGar, iC'S.t o 5 SERMON II. properly demonftrative of the fource whence any re- ligion Howed. But when the advocate for chriflianity argues in its behalf, that fo many thoufands were on a ludden converted to the faith ; that the religion of Chrifl: fo widely and fo aufpicioufly fpread its inlluence over a large portion of the habitable world ; the force of this argument is not derived from the mere preva- lence of chriilianity, but from its prevalence under thofe peculiar circumftances, in which the gofpel, at its firft preaching, appears to have been placed. Nor does the important argument in favour of chriflianity, thus draM^n from its rapid propagation, lofe any thing of its weight, from the eflablifiiment of falle religions in the world ; unlefs it could be fhewn, that they were propagated under circumuances equal- ly difadvantageous, and by means equally miraculous. How far this v/as the cafe with Mahometifm, will appear from an impartial confideration of the (late of things at the time v/hen it was propofed to the world, and of the caufes which contributed to its fuccefs. In reviewing the caufes which feem to have facili- tated the progrefs of Mahometifm, the firft and great- elf which prefents itfelf to our confideration, is the miferable and diftraded flatcof the Chriftian church. If in furveying the hiftory of the iixth and feventh centurie?, v/e call to our remembrance that purity of doctrine, that fmiplicity of manners, that fpirit of meeknefs and univerfal benevolence, which marked the character of the Chriflian in the Apoftolic age, the dreadful reverfe which we here behold, cannot but ftrike us with aftonifhment and horror. Divid- ed into numb'jriefs parties on account of diftintStions the mod trifling and abfurd, contending with each other from perverfenefs, and pcrfecuting each other with rancour, corrupt in opinion, and degenerate in pradice, the Chriftians of this unhappy period feem M. to SERMON II. 37 to have retained little more than the name and ex- ternal profelTion of their religion. Of a Chriflian church fcarce any vedige remained. The moll })ro- fiigate principles and abfurd opinions were univerfal- ly predominant ; ignorance amidft the mofl fav^our- able opportunities of knowledge ; vice amidft the nobleft encouragements to virtue ; a pretended zeal for truth, mixt with the wildeft extravagancies of er- ror ; an implacable fpirit of difcord about opinions which none could fettle ; and a general and llriking iimilarity in the commifiion of crimes, which it was the duty and intereft of all to avoid ! The gofpel indeed was in itfeif pure and holy, while thefe hideous features of deformity character- ized its infatuated profeffors : but through the pre- judiced underftandings and indignant tempers of men, the odium incurred by perfcns was vehem.ently and unjuftly transferred to things : the merits of the caufe were not feparated by difpaffionate and nice diftinftion from the glaring imperfeftions of thofe who patronized it : and the partial and temporary inefficacy of chriftianity fupplied a plaufible train of objections to Its credibility and its ufe. It is an obvious, though juft remark^ that true re- ligion and learning have ever flourifhed and fallen together. Both had now for fome centuries been haftening with equal and vifible fteps to decay. The. fciences unpatronized by the emperors and perfons in authority, had long- ceafed to be confidered as the roads to wealth and honour, and were therefore no longer cultivated. The interefts of polite literature and philofophy had received irreparable injuries, by the incurfions of the Goths and other barbarous na- tions into the weftern provinces of the Roman em- pire. During the violence and danger which natur-. ally attended thefe tumultuous fcenes, there remain*, ed but little leifare or opportunity for ih-xt who C 3 • -^ J» 8 S E R r,I O N II. were ftill defiroiis of attending to the liberal arts. And it is highly probable that they mufl have totally periflied in the general confufion, had they not found a wretched and precarious flielter in the cloifters of the monks. Here indeed their ftill venerable re- mains were preferved awhile ; though they received only fuch a degree of culture, as ferved to difplay the glorious height from which they had fallen. Hiflorians have exhibited to us the moft melan- choly picture of the univerfal darknefs and ignorance, which at the beginning of the feventh century had overfpread all ranks of men. Even the ecclefiafti- cal orders fcarceiy afforded an exception to the ge- neral defcription. Am.ong the bifliops, the grand in- ftruclors and defenders of the Chridian church, i^ew (we are told) could be found, whofe knowledge and abilities were fufEcient to compofe the difcourfes, how- ever mean and incoherent, v/hich their office fome- tim.es Qbliged them to deliver to the people. The greater part of thofe among the monaftic orders, whom the voice of an illiterate a^re had dignified with O O the charader of learning, lavilhed their time and talents in ftudying the fabulous legends of pretended faints and martyrs, or in compofmg hiftories equally fabulous ; rather than in the cultivation of true fcience, or the defufion of ufeful knowledge. Nor was the condition of the Eaftern church more favourable to the intereft of literature. Diftraded by the implacable animofity of contending parties, Nef- torians, Monophyfites, and the numberlefs fubdivi- fions of thofe two fcfts, it v/as a ftranger to that peace and tranquillity which is abfolutely neceifary to the cultivation, and even the exiftence of learning. In- tent only upon the annoyance of each other, all par-, ties had equally forfaken the broad and open paths of manly philofophy and liberal fcience, for the narr. rev/ and perplexing intricacies of metaphyfics. The champions . 5 E R M O N II. 39 champions of the contending factions directed alike their principal attention to the writings of Arido tie ; and in order to arm they: followers with logical fub- tleties, tranflated many of the works of that profound philofopher into their refpecllive languages.* Of the writings which threw a feeble glimmering over the darknefs of this unhappy period, the far greater part were controverfial. In the few which have remained to the prefent times, it is eafy to trace the melancholy dechne of piety as well as of hteraturc. That natural and beautiful fmiplicity which is the ilriking charaderiitic of the writings of the apoilolic age, and of the firfl defenders of chriftianity, v/as now fucceeded by the coarfe and confufed jargon of the fchools, by the loud and fierce clamors of per- fonal invediive, and by all the difmgenuous arts of fophillry, which indultrioufly perplexed truth ; and of bigotry, which perverfely oppofed it. While ignorance was thus extending her dominion over the Chriftian world, fuperilition, her genuine offspring, followed clofe behind. The progrefs of corruption is rapid and unbounded. When once the profeflbrs of chriftianity had departed from that pur- ity of worfliip, and that limplicity of faith, which Chrill and his apofties had prefcribed, and impiouHy dared to ered a fupcrllruSiure of worthlefs materials upon the hrm and folid foundations of the gofpel ; it was impoffibie to fix any limits to ^ the growing cor- ruption. One abufe was daily added to another ; and the introduclion of one fuperifition ferved only to pave the way for a thoufand others, more falfe and more pernicious, which followed in its train. To go back no farther than the beginning of the third century ; even at that early period, it is eafy ta obJerve the unfeemly fabric of fuperftitious ceremony gradually rifmg upon the ruins of genuine piet\\ X lie * See Atul-Fhara", RiA. Dvnaft. d. qi. 40 S E R M O N II. The. far greater part of thofe corrupt doclrlnes and vain fuperllitions", which formerly occafioned the rep- aration of our ancelfors from the communion of the licijnirji church, and of which we ftiU continue to en- tertain a juft abhorrence, were introduced and ellab- liihed'during the darknefs cf this and the fucceeding age. An extravagant veneration for departed faints and martyrs, the idolatrous worfliip of images and relics, and laftly the abfurd and fanciful notion of a fire deftined to purify the foul after death, from the pollutions it had contracted wliile in the body ; thefe opinions which are ftill held facred and eflential by the church of Rome, were the fuccefiive progeny of the ignorance and fuperftition of thefe ages. At the time of Mahomet thefe corrupt opinions had nearly eclipfed the luftre of the gofpel. The very eil'ence of chriftianity was loft under a load of idle and fuperfcitious ceremonies, which were daily mul- tiplied without bounds ; and the unmcaninjcr pom)-) of a gaudy and oftentatious worfliip was fubftiruttd in the room of the hmple, yet nobler oblation of the heart. The primitive Chi iftians with anxious zeal confin- ed tlieir woviliip to the one moll high God, through iiis fon Jefus Chrifc 5 but thofe who now called them- felves bv that venerable name, had multiplied almoll to infinity the objevils of their devotion. Neglecting, or forgetting the grand and only mediator between God and man, the trembling votary bowed at the fnrine of fome reputed faint, a mortal frail and Aveak like himfelf, to implore his intercelTion, either in ob- taining the favour, or in averting the vengeance of an oiJended God. The b.lelfed Virg^in was raifed to a dignity, and adorned with titles, which neither fcripture could warrant, nor reafon approve : and the mother cf the man Chrill jefus was often honoured \Aith a more ailiduous devotion, and addrefled with more S E R M O 1^7 II. 41 more frequent prayers than the Son of God himfelf. Even the fancied remains of that crofs, on which the Saviour of mankind had died, to expiate the fms of the vi'orld ; the images of the faints who had laboured to^ difi'eminate, and the bones of the martyrs who had died to confirm the faith, were now, by the arts of a defigning priellhood, and the ignorance of a fuperfti- tious multitude, held up as proper objects of religious adoration. Where opinions are thus depraved, it is unreafon- able to expert that the pradice fliould be exemplary. Accordingly, we find, that the decay of morality kept equal pace with that ot piety. The vt'ealth, as well as the privileges and authority of the clergy, had increafed confiderably during the reign of ignorance and fuperflition. To this increafe nothing had more efl'e£l:ually contributed, than the opinion that remiilion of fins, however black and heinous, was to be purchafed by the liberality of the penitent to the churches and the miniftry ; and that the interccllion of departed faints was to be bought by fuitable offerings prefented on the altars which were confecrated to their memory. But the increafing wealth of the ecclefiallical orders cjraduailv introduced amono; them all that train of vices and follies, which affluence and profperity nat- urally bring v/ith them. Their luxury, their pride, their ambition knew no bounds. Hence the turbu- lent and Ihamelefs contentiorts of the bifhops concern- ing the extent and authority of their fees. Hence the frequent and aimoil perpetual ilruggles between the bifhops of Rome and Conilantinople, the two grand rulers of the Chriflian church, to the irreparable in- jury and dilgrace of chrillianity. But what feems more peculiarly to have character- ized the age of which we are fpcaking, io tht: furious an^ relenllefi fi^iiit of perfecuuc:!. It 43 SERMON II. It was the fevere remark of a Pagan hiftorlan* con- cerning the Chridtians of the fourth century, " That their enmity towards each other, exceeded the fury of the beafts againft man.'* In the fucceedinp; aeres this evil graduiiy mcreal'ed, till at length the unworthy profeflbrs of chriilianity had univerfally let loofe the lavage fpirit of perfecution upon each other, without refcraint, and without remorfc. That charity and univerfal benevolence v^hich the great author of their rehgion fo often enjoined, and fo well exemplified in his own life and character, were by his degenerate followers either forgotten or difregarded. Varieties of opinion, which were rather nominal than real, and ihades of difl-ercnce which are fcarcely perceptible to the acuteft obferver in the prefent a^e, were deemed fufficient to make void alike the fpirit, and awful commands of the gofpel, the facred privileges of hu- manity, and the tender ties of relationfhip. The blind fury of fuperllitious zeal extinguiilied the ten- dereft fentiments of nature : the maje'ly of the laws was tram^pled on and violated with impunity : the cities of the Eafl were deluged with blood. Such is the m.elanchoiy picture of complicated mifery and diftradion, which hiftorians have univer- fally drawn of the chriflian world in general, and of the Eailern church in particular, at the opening of the feventh century. It may be fufficient to have thus briefly reprefented the dillinguifhing particulars of the (late of chriftiani- ty, at the time when Mahomet affumed the prophetic character. The advantages and affiflance which the impolter derived from thefe circumllancesof his times, in the propagation and eftablifliment of his new re- ligion, are fufficiently obvious : it is neceflary only to remark, that thefe advantages were feized with irre- fillible ardour, and purfued v/ith unremitted adivity. If * Aramiap Marccll. lib. xxii. cap. v. p. 233, S E R M O N II. 43 If the corruptions and diflrefles of chriftianlty were thus fignally favourable to the afpiring views of Ma- homet, the political and religious flate of Arabia at that time, contributed not lefs remarkably to the fuc ccfs of the impoflor, "While the once formidable empires, of Rome on the one hand, overwhelmed by the fierce incurfions of the northern barbarians, and of Perfia on the other, diflraded by its own inteftine divifions, were evidently in the lafl ftage of decay, Arabia was in every refpeft proi'perous and flourifhing. Naturally populous in itfelf, it had received a very confidera- ble acceiTion of inhabitants from the Grecian em- pire ; from whence the violence of religious perfecu- tion had driven great numbers to feek an afylum in a country, where they might enjoy their opinions without interruption, and profefs them without danger. Arabia had ever been celebrated as the feat of un- bounded liberty : divided into many independent tribes, it of courfe adm.itted an almofl endlefs varie* ty of religious opinions. The Jews had early eftabliflied themfelves in this country, even before the time of the apoftles ; for the Arabians are enumerated among thofe who came to celebrate the feaft of pentecofl :* and at thede- flruciion of Jerufalem by the K.om.an power, many of them efcaped hither, as to a place of refuge from the dreadful calamities, which the jufl vengeance of God inflicted on their nation. Chriftianity had alfo made a very confiderable progrefs among [ome of the tribes of Arabia ; and in particular that fed: of it, which was diflinguifhed by the title of Jacobites. But the religion v/hich was mofl extenfively dif» feminated, and moft highly efleemed am.ong the Ara^ bians, before* the time of Mahomet, was idolatry. Of 44 SERMON II. Of this there were feveral diftlncl kinds : but the predominant fpecies appears to have been that of the Sabians ; who held the unity of God, though at the fame time they worfhipped the fixed (tars, and planets, the angels and their images, as fubordinate deities ; whofe mediation with the one moil; high and fupreme God they ardently implored. From the neighbouring fituation and frequent in- tercourfe which fubiilled between the Perfiaus and the inhabitants of Arabia, the religion of the IMagi had likewife found its wav, and obtained an eltablilh- ment among fonie of their tribes. To this divided ftate of the religion and govern- ment of Arabia, doubtlefs much of the fuccefs, if not the very exiftence of Mahometifm, may be reafona- bly afcribed. Had the various unconnefted tribes of that extenfive country been united under one common government, the daring projecl m.uft quick- ly and inevitably have been crulhed by the weight of fuperior power. Or, had one common fyftem of re- ligious worfliip been univerfaily received throughout the whole, the impoftor muft certainly have funk un- der the attempt to fubvert the eftabiifhcd belief and opinions of his country. Prejudices derived from early education, and con- firmed by habit, became as it v/ere interv/oven with our very conftitution ; and thofe opinions which feem connected with the av/ful fanctions and the pre- cious interefl of religion, we are always difpofed to watch xAth unufal jealoufy, and to guard with unuf- ual firmnefs. Hence arifes the neceffity which every impoflor is under of adapting his fchemes to the pre- conceived notions of thofe whom he defigns to mif- kad. The mod carelefs cbferver cannot but remark, that this fpirit of accommodation flrongly diilinguifh- es the condufl: of Mahomet, and the charafter of his religion. Vvith the Jew he maintained the infpira^ tion E R M O N II. 45 tion of Mofes, the authority of the Pentateuch, and of the prophetic writings. With the Chriftian he admitted the divhie miliion of Jeius Chrifl, and the truth of the gofpel. He even attempted to found bi5 own pretenlions on the preceding revelations of Mofes and of Chrifl : and profelfcd, with much plaufibility, that he was fent to purify a rehgion which originally came down from heaven, from the pollu- tions it had unhappily contracted during its refidencc among a frail and degenerate race of beings ; to ihut the book ; to clofe the fcal of prophecy ; and to communicate the lail gracious offers of divine mercy and inftruccion to fmiul man. To win the affections of his idolatrous countrymen, he indulged their prejudices ; he gave a new and fu- perior fandion to their favourite ceremonies and cuf- toms, and adorned them v/ith more pompous and at- tracting enibellirnments. To the original fuccefs of this crafty and well con- certed fchemc, nothing perhaps more effectually con- tributed than the extreme and deplorable Y%^ant of all intellectual culture, under which the far greater part of the Arabians then laboured. Ignorance is ever tiie ftrongcd and the fafeft ground, on v/hich impof- ture can be erected. Civilization at that time had made but little progrefs in Arabia. The art of writ- ing had been known and practifed by their country- man Job, and by the tribe of liamyar, for many cen- turies before the birth of Mahomet : but even at that late period the reft of the Arabs were totally unac- quainted v/ith this ufeiul art. . Thofe of Mecca in particular, to whom the pretended prophet firit aflert- ed his, divine commifiion, and propofsd his nev/ re- ligion, 'were pecuharly diliinguiHied as ignorant and illiterate, even to a proverb. Accultcmed continually to a roving and unfettled life, the greater part of the Arabs carried their liter- ary 46 SERMON li. ary purfults no farther than to the comporition of rude, though fomctimes beautiful verfes on the fub- jeds of Jove or war ; or they amufe themfelves by fireqnently reciting the favourite works of their moft celebrated poets. The pafloral life has ever been deemed favourable to the mufes. Accordingly we find that in works of imagination, the Arabs, even in their uncivilized ftate, were not wholly deflitute of merit : but to the profound refearches of philofophy, and the laboured deduftions of reafon, they were of neceffity entire ftrangers. The ignorance, the doubts, and the uncertainty which univerfally prevailed among the Arabians, with regard to the immortality of their foul, was alfo a circumftance which had no inconfiderable influence in the eflabhihment of Mahometifm. Many of them abfolutely denied the poUlbility of a future (late of ex- illence ; and without the fmalleft expeftation of a refurreftion, terminated all their views in the grave. There were others indeed among them, who had conceived a more exalted, and in fome refpeas, a jufler idea of human nature ; who imagined that death, though it might fufpend, yet did not put a fi- nal period to man's exiflence ; and who raifed their hopes to fome happier country, where, after their de- parture from this world, they ftiould again be called into being. Whether this dodrine had been tranf- mitted to them through the medium of tradition, or whether they had received fome intimations of it from the Chriftians, or the jews, who were difperfed through the Eafl, is uncertain. But though they might be convinced of their future exiflence, yet they were totally unable to form any rational ideas about the mode of that exifcence, or about the moral con- IHtution of that ftate that waadeflined to receive them. Their notions of another world feem to have been entirely fenfual, and formed only on the model of the prefent. S E R M O N II. 47 prefent. They imagined that the fame paffions, the fame wants and inlirmities which they felt on earth would ilill attend them beyond the grave ; and be- lieved that even the animals v/hich had contributed to their eafe and convenience in the prefent, would be no lefs neceiTary to their happinefs in a future life. Such was the itate of the nation, and fuch were the people, to whom Mahomet firll offered a religion ; which while it retained aimofl: every principle and opinion that immemorial cuflom had taught them to revere, at the fam.e time held forth nev/ do&rines, the moil pleafmg and captivating to the human heart- To thofe among them who prefumed not to lift their hopes beyond the prefent life, but looked forward -with fullen acquiefcence to the gloomy profpeft of annihilation, the promife of an eternal ftate of exift- cnce, to be paiied in confummate happinefs, could not but aitcrd the ftrongcic and mofl: irrefiftible attrac- tions. Others who already indulged a faint, though pleafmg defire of iramovLaiity, would embrace with eagernefs a clearer and more diftincL profpcct of fu- turity ; which at once enlarged, and confirmed, their former hopes. The Mahometan paradife vvas adorned with all the gayefl colours of the imagination. A felicity confifting only of pure and fpiritual pieafure, would have been too refined for the grofs and fcnfuai conceptions of the uncivilized tribes of Arabia. Gardens fairer than that of Eden, watered by a thoufand ftreams, and eii-- livenUi by the blooming beauties of Paradife, feemed better calculated to excite their defires, and to en- gage their attention. While this happinefs and thefe pleafures were thus gracloufly offered to the faithful, who received and em- braced his new religion ; the mofl dreadful torments which imagination could fuggeft, were at the fame time denounced againil: an unbelieving world. Tempted 48 S E R M O N n. Tempted on the one hand by promifes thus fpecloirs and alluring, and afiailed on the other by new and unheard of terrors, againft which his former princi- ples could afford him no certain refourcc ; what wonder is it, that the unlettered Arabian willingly embraced a religion, which thus forcibly addrefled itlelf to his ftrongeft paflions ? His hopes and fears dike confpired to roufe, and to firengthtn his faith : Jind if he could only once perfuade himfelf that the religion which w^as offered him, might pofiibly be true, the reafon even of the moit ignorant barbarian would immediately inform him, that in rejecting fuch a religion he 7ntgbt be prefumptuous, and in embrac- ing it he could not be imprudent. But further, it was a circumftance which probably had very confiderable weight in recommending the religion of Mahomet to his countrvmen, and to the world, that the doctrines v/hich it taught, were in general the plainefl and moil fimple that can be im- agined ; and that it totally diiclaimed all thofe myf- teries, at which the pride of human reafon is fo apt to revolt. The facred and myfterious doctrine of the Trinity in Unity, which the religion of Chrift had firft revealed to mankind, has ever been a (lone oi' {tumbling, and a reck of offence to the proud dif- puters of this world. To this doctrine, becaufe above the reach of human reafon, infidelity has often ob- jected ; and prefumptuouily dared to deny what it could not comprehend : whilff the Chriilian, fatisft- ed that it is exprefsly authorized by that ^ligion which) he knows to be divine, believes and adores in humble and fubmiffive filence. But the Unity cf God, which fofms the grand fundamental doctrine of Mahcmetifm.^ is alfo univer- fally admitted as one of the firft principles of natural religion. To this doftrine (as has been already ob- ftrved) the greater part of the Arabians before the time S E R M O N IT. 49 time of Mahomet were no flrangers : and though in practice they had miferably corrupted themfelves, by the worfnip of inferior agents, yet in behef they ftilt maintained the Unity of the divine nature facred and inviolate. We have now taken a (hort, though comprehenfive view of the principal caufes, v.'hich feemed to have contributed mod materially to the original fuccefs of Mahometifm. The means by which it was after- wards fo firmly ellabliihed and fo widely propagated through the world, are too plain, as v/ell as too ge- nerally known, to require either minute difcuilion, or profound remarks. No fooner had the infinuating addrefs of the im- poftor (affifted by that concurrence of favourable circumftances which v/e have enumerated) enabled him to aifemble a party fufficient to fupport his am- bitious defigns, than he threw oiF the ihafk which was no longer neccffary ; and difclaiming the fofter arts of perfuafion and reafoning, immediately adopted a quicker an^:' more efficacious mode of converfion. It was alledged by the deceiver, that fmce a difobedient world had difdained, or rejected the ineffeftual fum- mons which the divine mercy had fent in former times by the prophets, who came with appeals to the fenfes and reafon of mankind ; it had now pleafcd the Almighty to fend forth his laft great prophet, by the (Irength of his arm and by the power of the fword, to compel men to embrace the truth. Adfcig under the fancied authority of this divine commifTion, looking forward with anxious expecta- tion to the joys of Paradife, and the glorious crown of martrydom which was laid up for thofe who fliould periih in the propagation of the faith, and convinced that their lot, whether of life or death, v. as abfolute- ly and inwitably predetermined ; the iirft followers of Mahomet were animated with that enthufiaftic D zeal, KO S E ^ M O N It. zeal, uliich inlpires the mofl invincible contempt of danger and of death. The fellow citizens of the impoflor, and thofe of his tribe, to whofc immediate charge the facred tem- ple had long been entrufled, either from principle, or from pride, for a v/hile defended with unfhaken zeal, though with various fuccefs, the religion of their fa- thers. Exhaulled, however, by a bloody and unavailing oppofition, they were at lafl compelled to yield to the fupcrior addrefs, or more ferocious courage of their adverfaries. The fubmilTion of the holy city at once fecured the authority, and completed the triumph of the con- queror. The fenfelefs obje(£l:s of Arabian devotion, which ignorance and fuperftition had raifed to the rank of divinities, were now with impetuous and undiftin^ guilliing ze^I, difgraced and demoliflied. The facred and venerable character of the temple, Avas however _, ilill preferved inviolate ; its worfhip, its ceremonies, and its ordinances were flill retained : with this dif- ference only, that they were transferred from inferior and dependent deities, to the one mofl high and fu- preme God. Flattered b-y this attention to their prejudices and their interefls, and influenced by the dread of fuperi- or power, the inhal itants of Mecca and its neighbour- hood contemplated in filence the difgraceful over- throw of their idols ; and with real or affedlecWeadi- nefs, flocked to the flandard, and bowed before the God of INIahomct. PofTeiTed of the gi*and objeft of his wiiiies, the im- poflor no longer fcrupled to aliume the enfigns of temporal as well as of fpiritual dominion ; ,mu{l not rafiily,and indifcriminately,beimputed to the particular and immediate agency of God. Suc- cefs alone, a? we have already fhewn, affords no ab- folute SERMON II. 's$ foiuteproof of the favour and approbation of the Deity ; no determinate and appropriate evidence for the truth or divine original of any doftrines or opinions. It is only in particular fituations, and under pe- culiar circumflances, that the argument drawn from fuccefs can be allowed to polTefs any weight ; in fitu- ations, where no human ilrength or genius could of itfelf have prevailed ; under circumflances, where impoflure could never have fupportcd itfelf amidft the dangers that vifibly furrounded it. Now, that this difcription is by no means applica- ble to the cafe of Mahometifm, is evident from the foregoing recital : from whence it appears that every circumflance of the times, every particular in the manners and fituation of mankind, plainly and forci- bly concurred to favour the bold and artful impoflure. The caufes of the original fuccefs of Mahometifm may clearly be traced in the fcandalous divifions, and deplorable corruptions of the Chriftian church ; .in the political and religious flate of Arabia ; in the in-. dependence and want of union among its tribes ; in the grofs ignorance (particularly with regard to re- ligion) of its barbarous and uncivilized inhabitants ; and laflly, in the nature and genius of Mahometifm itfelf : in the fafcinating allurements of its promifed rewards, in their agreeablenefs to the propcnfities of corrupt nature in general, and to thofe of the inhab- itants of warmer climates in particular ; in the artful accomi^dation of its doftrines and its rites to the preconceived opinions, the favourite palTions, and the deep rooted prejudices of thofe to v\^hom it was ad- drelfed : In the poetic elegance with which its doc- trines, its precepts, and its hifLories were adorned ; and in the captivating manner in which they were delivered- As the corrupt and diflrafted flate of the Chriflian church had originally aflifled the rife, fo did it oper, i;ate S6 S E R U O N II. rate with flill greater force in favour of the fubfequent progrefs of Mahometan impofture. If indeed we al- low to this caufe its proper influence ; if we confider the weaknefs of the furrounding nations, and the nat- ural llrength of Arabia, now colledled and pointed to one objeQ: ; if we refieft on that fervor of zeal, and that wildnefs of enthufiafm, which were now fuper- added to the native valour of a hardy and warlike people ; we fhall ceafe to wonder at the vidories and triumphs they obtained over the lukewarm and de- generate defenders of the gofpel. Of thefe victories and thefe triumphs the propaga- tion of their new faith was the profeffed object and defign : thus by violence and bloodilied had the pro- phet himfelf finally ellabliflied his religion among his countrymen ; and thus had he exprefsly com- manded his followers to extend it over all the regions of the earth. Of the continuance of Mahometifm, when thus ellabliihed, and of its exigence to the prefent times, various caufes m.ight be alTigned, whofe joint opera- tion would be fufficient to account fully for the effecl, without having recourfe to any miraculous or par- ticular interpofition of providence. Of thefe caufes one only fnall be mentioned in this place, and that, becaufe it appears to be of peculiar force and im- portance. In almofl all thofe countries which acknowledge the authority of Mahomet, fo intimate Is the ^nnec- tion, fo abfolute the dependence of the civil govern- ment on religion, that any change in the latter mult neceffarily and inevitably involve the ruin and over- throv/ of the former. The Koran is not, like the gofpel, to be confidered merely as the ftandard by which the religious opinions, the worfliip, and the pradtice of its followers are regulated ; but it i-s .alio a political fvftern : on this foundation the throne it- felf S E R M O N II. 57 felf is ere£led ; from hence every law of the ftate is derived ; and by this authority every queftion of life and of property is finally decided. It is obvious therefore, that, in every country where Mahometifm had been once received and eftablifhed, the circumftance which I have now mentioned, muft have operated with uncommon weight to crufh any- important innovation in religion : fmce, ' from this infeparable connexion between the fanctions of re- ligion and thofe of the (late, every fuch innovation could be confidered in no other light, than as an at- tempt to overturn the civil government, to loofen the bands of fociety, and to deftroy every privilege of law, and every lecurity of property. Such then being the circumftances, and fuch the means by which the religion of Mahomet was fo wide- ly diffufed, and fo firmly eflabliilied in the world ; Its fuccefs, however aftonifhing, is capable of being- accounted for by mere human caufes ; and confe- quently to fuppoie any extraordinary and particular interpofition of the Deity, is evidently unneceiTary and abfurd. Ultimately, indeed, this awful and mem- orable change in the religion and manners of fo great a part of mankind, like every other human event, muft be referred to the over ruling providence of that God, whofe judgments are unfearchable, and Vvhofe Vv^ays are paft finding out ; whofe wifdom uni- formly bringeth good out of evil ; and who maketh even the yiolence of the wicked, and the artifices of the impoflor fubfervient to the accomplifhment of his gracious, though myfterious defigns. Let not then the Chriftian be offended, or the in- fidel triumph at the fuccefsful eftablifhment and long continuance of fo acknov/ledged an impofture, as affording any refonable ground of objedion againft our holy faith. Let '5S S E R M O N II. Let thefe events rather be confidercd as evidences of its truth ; as accompHflinients of the general pre- diftion of our Lord, ihztjalfe Chrijis and fa If e pro- phets Jhould arife^ and fhould deceive many ; and efpcc- ially of that particular and exprefs prophecy in the Revelations* of his beloved difciple, which has been determined by the ableft commentators, to relate to the impoftor Mahomet, and his falfe and impious re- ligion ; which arifing like a fnoke out of the bottomlcfs pit, fuddenly overfhadowed the Eaftern world, and involved its wretched inhabitants in darkncfs and in error. • Rev. II. I, &c. SERMON SERMON III. ACTS V. 38, 39. \¥ THIS COUNSEL, OR THIS WOE.K, BE OF MEN, IT WILL COME TO NOUGHT : BUT IF IT BE OF GOD, YE CANNOT OVERTHROW IT. T O collect and generalize ideas, to givs them precifion by rules and comprehenfion by fyi- tem, is the diflinguifliing privilege of man. Hence arife thofe principles, which are of the mofi extenfive . and confpicuous ufe in the calculation of moral pre':. • abilities, in the conduct of common life, and in af- certaining both the evidence of fafts and the tenden- cy of adions. Hence too proceed, alike, our virtu- ous and deftrudive prejudices ; our power of per- plexing truth and of unfolding it. Eut the utility of general rules, invariably and neceflarily depends up- on a nice ?nd fair adjuflment of them to the particu- lar circum.ilances which they are em^plcyed to illuf- trate. A wide field here opens itfclf for the vigor- ous and honeft exercife of our intelledual faculties ; for the fufpenfion of judgment where the evidences are fcanty, or obfcure, or contradiclcry ; for decided and firm ailent where they are numerous, and bright, and confiftent. In the mixed flate of human affairs, we cannot indeed be too diligent in collecting mate- rials for inquiry ; or too cautious in determining their comparative force, by the ftandard of general rules. The moft ordinary and familiar events are fometimes diftingiiifhed by peculiarities, which check the inquifjtive mind from hafty and undiftinguifliing ailent. The moft extraordinary and complicated, when 6o SERMON m. when attentively furveyed, conftitute fome diftinft and general principle, to which fimilar phenomena may be reduced ; or gradually unfold themfelves into a clear and perfect conformity to thofe very rules, to which they, on their firfl appearance, were utterly irreconcileable. From the grofs conception, therefore, or the rafti application of general maxim?, proceed thofe errors which too fatally feduce, and thofe difficulties v/hich fo often confound, the human underllanding. On the contrary, by the difpaffion- ate and juft ufe of them we detect fpccious impofture and penetrate into the molt improbable, but moft im- portant truths. The propriety of thefe obfervations will prefent it- felf to every hearer, who oppofes the fmgular cir- cumftances, under which Mahomet promulgated and eftablifhed his religion, to the well known, but very perv^erted maxim, thatfuccefs is a decifive proof of divine interpofition. For this reafon, I took occa- fion in the lad difcourfe to obferve, that in order to accomplifh the myllerlous dcfigns of his providence, the Deity is often plcafed to permit the fuccefs of thofe aftions and opinions, which it is contrary to his nature and attributes to approve. This pofition was more particularly illuftrated by the memorable example of the Arabian impoftor, whofe falfe and impious pretences to divine revelation were, by the permiffion of an unfearchable providence, crowned with an almofl unexampled fuccefs ; and whofe per- • nicious herefy taking deep root, and bearing fruit upwards, is even now fuffered to cafl; its deadly fhade over the far greater part of the Eaftern world. But to whatever extent the argument v/hich refuUs from fuccefs may have been pufhcd by the interefted patrons of error, or the ill judging defenders of truth ; there are ftill circumftances, in which it is undoubt- edly conclufive. Dangerous as it mny be to argue from ' SERMON III. 6i from the fuccefs of events, however extraordinary, which the acknowledged interefts and concurring efforts of men may polfibly have produced, there is curtainly no room for miitake in thofe which are ev- idently obove the reach of human ftrength and wif- dom, and v/hich have been effected in direft oppofi- tion to every earthly power. When therefore we behold an effect produced, be- tween which and its apparent human caufes no in- genuity can trace anv probable proportion ; when we perceive a work accompliihed by inftruments of known and limited powers, which at the fame time nctorioully exceeds the utmoft conceivable extent of thofe powers ; it is not only jufi and reafonable, but it is even neceifary to acknowledge, that in the finger of God we find the only adequate, and therefore the real and iliuflrious cav.fe. In carrying on thefe reflections to the gradual eftabliiliment of the gofpel, it will be proper to con- fider at large the obftacles which oppoied its progrefs in the world, and the character and abilities of its firfl propagators. It was the remark of an infpired Apoflle, concern- ing the gofpel and its firft preachers, that God * had chef en the foolijh things of the ivorldto confound the ivfc^ and the '■xcak things of the world to confound the things that weve ?nighty. Now to the candid inquirer, who views with at- tention the various and llubborn difficulties, with which the teachers of chriflianity were unavoidably left to Itruggle ; and who confiders the infufficiency of the powers which they naturally poifeffed, to over- come thofe difficulties, this reprefentation of the A- poftle will feem by no means the boafl of audacious vanity or the jargon of wild fanaticifm. When the twelve difciplcs received the laft command of their departing * i Cor. i, 27, 62 SERMON III. departing Lord, to * go and teach all nations, baptiz" ing them in the name of the father, and of the Son, a?id of the Holy Ghofc ; this extraordinary commiffion to the eye of human reafon might well appear the moft romantic and vifionary. Suppofmg them, for the prefent, to have been unaffifled from on high ; weak and illiterate as they were, could they for a moment prefume to hope for the fuccefs of fo perilous and fo arduous an enterprife ? Deprived of that proteftion and fupport, which the miracles and prefence of their mafter had hitherto afforded them, their fituation w?.s now become the mod: forlorn and defpcrate that can pofiibly be imagined. Every thing around them wore an appearance dangerous to their perfons, and hoftile to their caufe. In the execution of their ex- tenfive office, they had not only to contend with the jealoufy of power, and the perfecution of authority ; their progrefs was impeded by foes {Ull more formid- able ; by the deep rooted prejudices, the favourite fuperftiticix", and the darling vices of a corrupted world. From their countrymen, in particular, as they had nothing to hope, they had every thing to fear. They had to oppofe the inveteracy of cuflom ; and, v/hat was more formidable, the prejudices v^hich arofe from that dillinftion which the Jews had long enjoy- ed as the favoured people of the moil high God ; a diilinftion v^^hich had been fupported by a train of events equally gracious and wonderful ; and in fome particular inllances confirmed by miracles, that car- ried with them the very flamp and fcal of omnipo- tence. The promife of a Redeemer of Ifarel, originally made to Abraham the great founder of their nation, repeated afterv/ards to David, and confirmed by the concurring voice of all their prophets, had indeed awakened , • Matt, ixvili, 13, S E II I^.I O N IK. 63 awakened among the Jews an earnefl and unlverfal expedation of the appearance of the MefTiah. The fame prc:phecie3 which foretold the coming, had like- wife marked out with peculiar precifion, every par- ticular concerning the character, the office, and the perfon of the Saviour. The myfterious union of the divine and human natures in the perfon of Chriftj was repeatedly Ihadowed out, and might have been fairly inferred from thefe very prophecies, which now pathetically predicted the meannefs, the fufierings, and the ignominious death of the MefTiah ; and now with all the v/armth and boldnefs of Eaftern poetry, painted the temporal grandeur, the victories, and the eternity of his kingdom. The future Redeemer was frequently and unequiv- ocally defcribcd, as * defpifed and rejected of men : as a man of fcrrczvs and acquainted with grief; as wounded for the trarfgrcffiom^ and bruifed for the ini- quities of his people ; and ladly, as clofing his unex- ampled diflreffes and unfpotted life, like the llieep led forth in patient and fubmillive filence to the flaughter. But unable, or unwilling to reconcile thefe feem- ingly oppofite and ccntradiftory characters, the Jew- ifh nation had Icng rejecled with difdain and abhor- rence every'idea of an infultcd and afilf&ed MefTiah. Seduced by carnal views, and impelled by ambitious hopes, which their frequent captivities and diftrelTes had fervcd only to heighten, they totally overlooked one part of their facred prophecies, and confined to their (Iricl and literal meaning the animated and fig- urative expreffions of the other. Hence in the per- fon of the LleiTiah, their promifed dehverer, they fondly beheld a mighty and glorious King, who fhculd appear with all the pcm.p cf temporal great- nefs and all the terrors cf earthly power, trampling upon • ICiiahUIi.j, &c. 64 SERMON IIL upon the enemies and the oppreflbrs of Ifrael, and leading forth his people amidil the triumphs of con- quelt, and the fplendour of dominion. Thefe expectations at once fo flattering to their pride, and fo agreeable to their wifhes, had long been cherifhed with a blind and bigotted fondnefs, and tranfmitted with increafing ftrength through fuccef- five generations. The manifeft expiration of the time prefcribed by the prophets, the departure of the fceptre from Judah, and the fubjection of their coun- try to the Roman power, were circumftances which at this time added new weight to the opinion, which had been thus endeared by early prejudice, and fanc- tified by authoritative tradition. Every heart was now warmed with hope, and every eye looked for- ward with anxious expefta-.ion, to the moment when the glory of Zion fhould appear, and Judaea be for ever exalted above the Idngdoms of the earth ; when they fhould behold fuppliant nations crowding into the fanftuary, and Rome herfelf, the haughty miftrefs of the world, bov/ing proftrate at the feet of Jerufa- lem. Nor were thefe glorious expe6lations confined to the chiefs and rulers of the Jews, whofe fuperior fla- tions feeming to entitle them to the firft honours and emoluments of the Mefliah's kingdom, might perhaps have induced them more readily to embrace, and more induflrioufly to difTeminate an opinion, which promifed fo complete a gratification to their ambi- tion. Even the difciples of our Lord, who Kad been la general fclefted fi-om the loweft and the meanell of the people, long retained the fame delufive opinion, and indulged the fame fallacious hopes, with the refl of their countrymen. Nay, fo firmly was this belief imprefTcd upon their minds, that net all the frequent and folemn declara- tions of their inal'cer to the contrary, were able to ef- face B E R M O N III. 6 s face it entirely : rior, indeed, do they feem to have been efFeftually roufcd from the pleafmg dream cf temporal grandeur which had captivated their imag- ination, till his death had tried the ccnftancy idF their faith, till his refurreclion had revived their drooping fpirits, and his afcenfion into heaven had redlified their errors, and invigorated their rcfolution; From this miftaken opinion arofe the frequent ftruggles for fuperiority among them, which they have fo ingcnioufly recorded : hence the petition of the mother of Zebedee's children : hence too the im- patience: and mifguaidcd zeal of Peter, who, whch Chrift had pathetically related his approaching humil- iation, his fufterings, and his death, took him and began to rebuke him, faying, * Be it far from thee. Lord ; thisjhall ?wt happen unto thee. To this may be added the v/ords of one of the dif- cipies with whom our Lord, in his way to Emmaus, converfed after his refurreclion, j We inficd that it had been He which Jhould ha-ve rcdeejiied Jfrael. This refledion arofe from the fame prejudice that hid long flattered the national vanity ; and expreffes the molt painful fenfe of difappcintment. When we rellect on the very extraordinary -mari- ner in which the divine Being had governed the jewilh nation, we cannot be furprifed that the multi- tude lliould be carried away by the Infatuation, which, always accompanies diilinftion. Emancipation from a fuperio^- pov/er is the natural wifh of the human heart : and it will be incl'eafed, when that power is adverfe to the original conilitatloii bbth of the (late, in which v/c are born, and of the church, to which we become attached. The fondnefg \vhich arifer, from education, and grov/s up with habit, becomes fanclified by authority : and it often happens, that the very apportion which 2im.s at. its depreifioru E eventuslly * ?.'att. ivi. 23. I Luke x:iv i\- 66 S E R M O N III. eventually efiablifhes its intereils in our hearts. Wc recoil at the indignity, which is oftered to the objett we have been accuftomed to regard with veneration : when a hoil of opponents rifes up to fink its credit, or lefien its influence j we fummon up nevv^ courage to defend the one, and new arguments to judify the other. The contempt which the Romans difcovered for the ecclefiaftical and civil polity of the Jews, aggra- vated the evils of opprellion ; and made the yoke of fubjeftion ftill more grievous and intolerable. Their only hope lay in their promifed redemption by the Meffiah. To this they looked forward with anxious and eager expectation ; and they confidered their pail deliverances from the bondage of captivity as the aufpicious earnefts of their future freedom. To be difappointed in the attainment of an obje£t which lay fo near their hearts, and which had fo oft- en foothed the painful fenfe of fubjedion to a foreign, power, was a circumflance too mortifying and humil- iating to be fupported by ihofe who were deluded by popular prepolfeiTions, or endowed only with a common fiiare of refignation. Hence we may ceafe to wonder at the great oppofition that was made to the claims of Jefus to the charader and office of the Meffiah. A perfon fo ipiobly defcended, fo meanly educated, fo deftltute ot thofe attractions which fo- llcit the notice, and engage the efteem of the world, appeared to human view altogether unqualified for the office he prefumed to fill, and totally uiiworthy of the character he had thought fit to adopt. * Is not tins the carpenter'' s fun ? was a queftion that perfons, guided by external appearances, would be ever rea- dy to propofe with a kind of indignant contempt, W'lienever he declared his cmbafTy as the Son of God, or announced his prerogative as the King of the Jews. The * M:ijt. xiii. 5J. SERMON III, 67 , The courfe of our Saviour's life was ill adapted to conciliate the eilcem and attention of a people, wlio were incapable of reconciling a mean appearance with a great defigii ; and who imagined that the interefts of heaven needed fuccour from the fplendour of this world. What could fuch a people, faitidious from falfe delicacy, and captious from falfe pride, expeft from a man, who * had not ^uhcre to lay his head ? How could they who were captivated by the dazzling diflindions of birth, and fortune, and rank in the World, aflbciate in all the habits of familiar inter- courfe with one, whofe companions were of the low- eff occupations, and who were neither diftinguifhed by the I'plendour of anceftry, nor the authority of high flation ? Common pride revolted at the idea of fuch degradation : and we wonder not that we fliould ilnd the following quefuon in the mouths of perfoK'^, who eftimated the gcodnefs of a caufe by the exter- nal eminence of thofe who v/ere its abettors, j- Have any of the rulers, or the Pharijees believed on him f But this people who knoiveth not the law, are curjed. As if they had faid, "Who are this man's followers and aflbciates ? They are fuch as would of themfeives bring difcredit on any caufe^ t bfcradedly from the confideration of its own merit. Do any of the rulers of the people, any of the great powers of the Sanhe- •drim, any perfons of diftin6:ion, either by depth of .learning, or dignity of charafter ; do any fuch perfons acknowledge this jefus, who lays claim to the name of the Meffiah ; or attach themfeives to him under that exalted and diftinguifhing charader ? No. The people who know not the law \ who never ftudied its principles, or who have been accurfed and excommu- ..nicated for want of a due obedience to its inilitutions, are the only fupporters of this novel feft. On their voice the ignoble founder of it refts his pretenfions \ E 0, and • Matt. viij. ao. \ Jeha vii. 48, 49. 68 SERMON III. and by their patronage only his prcfuinption is main- tained." An appeal conducted on fuch principles as this, carries with it more force than a thouiand arguments. It flatters the pride of the human heart, and is level with its lowed and moft; familiar prejudices. It was particularly well adapted to influence the minds o£ the jews, who had been inllruded to rely implicitly on the decifions of the elders ; and who had been accuftomed, without controverfy and without hefita- tion, to receive the law from the mouth of the Prieff. The ftate of religion among the Jews was, wc may eafily conceive, inaufpicious to the interefls of the gofpei ; and form.ed an obflacle to its fuccefs too powerful for any expedient but a miracle to control. The two great feds into which the Jewifli church %vas divided, carried av/ay the bulk of the people : but whatever rivallhip fubfifted between them, and whatever differences of opinion kept up the diftinc- tion of Pharifees and Sadducees, yet both united in. oppofing the gofpei ; and each feemed to vie with the other in difcovering a moft incurable malignity againft Chrift and his difciples. Here they forgot their mutual jealoufy, and loft fight of every inveter- ate prejudice, and every jarring intereft. The gof- pei, they well knew, looked with an eye equally un- friendly on both fe£ls ; and the leaders of each were reproved v/ith equal firmnefs and feverity by Jefus Chrift. He did not flatter the prejudices of either, nor attempt to engage their good will by any arts of •accommo ation. His doctrine v.-as in direft oppoH- ticn to the tenets of both ; and his example involved a conftant reprehenfion of their practice. He refift- ed with equal firmnefs the haughty fcepticifm of the Sadducce, and the abjcO; fuperftition of ihePharifee. Againft the one he m-^intaincd the dcflrine of a fu- ture ilfs ; and ^": Ov^ presence c: the other he expa« llatCd SERMON III. ($^ tiated on the folly of ceremonial obfervanccs, and the Fallacy of traditional do£lrines. The religion which had been, I may venture to fay, fubftituted in the room of that which was originally (delivered to the Jews by God hiinfelf, was indeed a motley and incongruous mixture of truth and falfe- hood, of divine revelation and hum.an invention. Ad- ditions had been made to the Mofaic ritual ; and the forms of divine worfiilp were incumbered with a vari- ety of needlefs and fuperflitious appendages. The true objeft of devotion was almoft forgotten, and the true fpirit of it nearly extinguiilied, amidlt a multi- piicity of unauthorized and fuperfluous ceremonies 5 and external fervices had fuperfcdcd internal and moral purification. Such impohtions, hcvv-ever burdenfome, were yet readily fubmitted to by perfonSj who had been taught to regard them as fubfliLutei for moral duties. To cleanfe the body by daily ablutions, was far more eafy than to preferve the pu- rity of the heart by habitual virtue. To abllain frcn^ certain meats and drinks, required lefs refolution and fewer conflids, than to curb the impetuofity of appe- tite, and to refill the allurem.ents of voluptuoufnefsa The original law, given to this people, encourged no idea of a difpenfation from any call of moral dutv under the pretence of ceremonial obfervanccs. It inculcated the abfolute neceffity, as well of internal, as external hoiinefs ; and inftrufted the Jews always to regard facriticc as fubordinate to mercy. It for- bad any to flatter themfclves with the hope of accept- ance for the fake of the former, while the obligation.^ Of the latter were difregardeil, or violated ; and. whenever the Jews perverted the defign cf divine in-, ftitutions, or lofl fight of the great obje»^i:3 which thefe inftitutions were appointed to promote, then did God by his prophets warn theni cf th^Ir fatal joiuake ; and even fpoke of ceremonies \^;hich he hac^ ♦to sermon hi. fiimfelf prefcribed, in terms, I had nearly faid, ol^ de- gradation and contempt. At the lime when our bleffed Lord began to an- nounce his miflion as the Meffiah, the pernicious fen- timent rcfpe^ting the efHcacy of ceremonial obedi- ence, had an almofl univerlal prevalence over the minds of the Jevi^s. It was not merely the fentimcnt of the ignorant vulgar ; but it had the fandion of ecclefiaftical authority to give it credit and counte- nance. The key of knowledge was kept in the hands, of men, whofe intereft it was to conceal it from the people. Hence they became ignorant of the more Ipiritual and fubftantiai parts of religion, and flatter- ed themfelvcs with the moll delufive hopes, in the midil of the mofi: flagrant breaches, and even the mod corrupt mifreprefentations of the divine com- mands. The more plain, which were alfo the more interefting parts of the law, were veiled and mifcon- ftrued, debafed and mutilated by the Scribes and El- ders ; whofe falfe gloffes had obfcured the very fun- damental principles of divine worfnip, and moral ob- ligation ; and who, by calling off the attention of men from iveighty maiievs. to trifling and indifferent circumflantials, had, as our Lord himfelf informed them, * made the word of God (jfnov.e effe^ through their iraditioyu. Their own whimfical fpeculations, or ar-. bitrary pofitions, had ufarped the feat of infpired doftrine : they were more aliiduous to amufc the im.agination'with the dreanis of the Rabbins, than to imprefs the heart with thofc principles, which have the beft tendency to proniote a holy and upright conduft, amidfl the various fituations and trials of life. For thefc reafons our Lord upbraided them for the indifcriminate regard which they paid to un- doubted revelation and dubious tradition ; and, in confequence of their intermixing the moft abfard and trifiing - * Mark vii. 13. SERMON III. 7^1 mfiing ceremonies with the mere folemn and author-' ized ads of religious fervice, he laid to them, * In vain do ye luorjhip God, teaching for doBrincs the com- mandments of men. The Jews, from the beginning, had been taught to connefl: religion v/ith places as well as perfons ; and to affix that kind of fandity to the former, as well as to pay that reverence to the latter, which weak minds would be very apt to apply to all the purpofes of fuperflidon ; and which policy would be lure to employ as an inftrument of fecuring the mod implicit fubmiflion to all its prefcriptions.. This people had firft an ark built as the fymbol of the divine prcfence : in a more fplendid period of their hiftory the temple was ereded ; where they were inftruded to perform the more folemn rites of religious worfhip. Accuflomed fo much to conned the Deity with lymbols, and his worfhip with times and places, there was nothing more mortifying to their pride, or more irreconcileable to their prejudices, than that dodrine which inculcated fuch worfhip of | the Father in fpiv' it and in truth, as was quite independent of all. the form.s, which authority had fandified, and cuuiom had familiarized : a dodrine which was regarded as a kind of blafpherriy againfl the temple, by Iclfcning its importance, and even fuperfeding its necciiity. As the law of Mofes was of divine inflitution, it deferved, and demanded the moft ferious regards ; and to flight any of its fernces, was to infult the au- thority which enjoined them. The veneration that was infpired by the fenfe of its original, was perfed- ly right in it5 principle ; though fuperflition had en- grafted on it mauy falfe and ridiculous opinions. As the law was allowed to be divine, wc need not won-- der that it was univerfally believed by this people, to E 4 h't *Majrk vii, 7. f Jolm isr. aj. j«.; S E R 1\I O N III. be perpetual ajlb. The fame prejudices, therefore, would in different circumflances lead the Jews to acl differently ; at one moment they perverted the law by human invention, and in the next they inferred, its immutability from its divine oiigin. What then could they thinly of a teacher, who while profelTui,^ bis miffion from God, introduced a religion which abrogated inftitutiojis confeffedly derived from tl:o lame God ? . When we refleft on the general ft ate of the Jewilli church, and the particular principles which prevailed among the different orders of which it was compofed, and the different feds into which it was divided ; when we confider what were their modes of worfhip, and what their habits of life ; how inveterate their prejudices ; and how flattering their expectations ; how ftubborn was their pride, which arofe from their dillin£tion, and how tenacious of all thofe privileges, which were the emblems of that diffinftion ; when we revolve thefe confiderations in our minds, i.nftead of bging furprifed at the oppontion, which the Jews of all ranks and denominations made to Jefus Chriil , we may rather wonder that a man fhould arife from among themj who lliould attempt to lay the founda- tion of a ne^y religion on the overthrow of all that had been held iacred and venerable for ages ; a re- ligion which fubverted national diftinCtlons, infreaci of eltablifning them ; which mortified national pride, Jnffcad of cheriffiing it ; which corrected every in- veterate error ; which fwept away all the idle incum- brances of external rites ; and ftrippc.d of its imag- inary fanctity even the temple of Jerufalem. V/hat had a religion fy:h as this to expect from the people to whom it w^is fnfh preached ? What, but all the contempt that vanity could manifeft , and ^l\ the oppofition ^yhich malice could effect ? Oil S E R IM O N III. -j^ On the other hand, what could infpire in tlie treaft of him that preached it, a confidence of fuc- cefs, but the wifdom of God ? And what, but the power of God, could give that fuccefs ? As the gofpel had the molt formidable oppofition to llruggle with from the people to whom it was firft preached, fo was it called to a conflict equally ardu- ous, and to human appearance unavailing and dcf- pejrate, with the reft of mankind, who were profcfl'- edly included in the grand and extenfive objedt it had in view. Its defign was the moil liberal that humani- ty could have wilhed, or benevolence could have planned. But while its extent gave difguft to the Jews, whofe fclftihnefs could not bear to fee that grace made univerfal, which they had hitherto fondly con- lidered as appropriate and peculiar to themfelves ; io^ on the other hand, the rewards which this grace was defigned to beflow^, and the means by which individ- uals might participate of its blefiings, w^ere fuch as were neither fuited to the tafle of the Gentiles, nor reconcileable with their cufloms, principles or pur- fuits. At the time when Chiiil appeared, the Ramarx empire had reached the very meridian of its glory. It was the illuftrious period, when power and policy re- 'ceiving aid from learning and fcience, and cmbelifli- mcnt from the orators and the poets, gave lay to the world, direfted its tafte, and even controuled its opin- ions. It was the age when enquiry was awake and active on every fubjed that was fuppofed to be of cu- rious or ufeful inveiligation, whether in the natural or the inteileftual world. It v/as, in fliort, fuch an age as impodure mull have found in every refpeci the lead aufpicious to its defigus ; efpecially fuch an im- poflure as chriftianity, if it had deferved the name. But tp reprefent in the ftrongefl light the great dii>.d vantage?, under which the p-ofpel laboured at its fiHt 74 SERMON Hi. firfl publication, it will be proper to give a fhort view of the ftate of philofophy and religion amono- the Gentiles at that period. With refpedl to the former, there were principles common to the various clafles and profellions into •which the unbounded licence of fancy and fpecula- tion had divided it, v/hich were in the higheft degree hoilile to the fimpliciiy of Chrillian iuidi, and to the purity of Chriltian practice. Viewed merely in theory, it jullly merited the cenfure paffcd on it by the apoille : and confidered in a practical light, it de- ferved dill feverer reprehenfion. At bed it was '■ vaifi deceit : for, whether it reafoned on met;»phyfics or theology ; on God, or nature ; its pohtions were ar- bitrary, and its conclufions fallacious. Far removed from the fimple and pure dictates of common fenfe, it involved itfelf in intricacies that tended to embar- rafs the underllanding ; and while it amufed the ge- nius of fpeculation, it either feduced the judgment in- to a rafh and flubborn dogmatifm, or iafuied doubts which led to an univcrfal fcepticilm. Bold and dar- ing in inquiries beyond the fphere of reafon, it aife<3:- ed to explain what it could not comprehend, or pre- fumed to condemn what it could not account for. Hence fprung philofophers, who crcficd fydems of what was f falfely called fcicncc, 2t.ccoTd'mg to their" particular prejudices ; and who made partial appear- ances the criteria of general prinoiplcs. Shall we wonder that men, who indulged their fancies in fuch excurfions into the unbounded wilds of fpeculation, I became vahi in their imaginaiiaiis ; and that their foolijlj heart was darkened ? But their philofophy was not merely vain ; it was pernicious alfo. It not only deluded the underlland- ing, but corrupted the heart. It unfettled the very firll principles of virtue and religion j it weakened, if * CqI. xi. S{. -f t Tim. vl, 50. \ Rooi. i, ?.I. SERMON III. ^? JF not totally deflroyed their befl motives ; and ren- dered their moft powerful fanftions, if not abfohue- ly abortive, yet at leaft uncertain. Carrying its prefumptuous and ungoverned fpecu- lations into the very effence of the Divinity, and (train- ing its eager fight to penetrate the pavilion of dark- nefs which encircles the eternal throne, ic firft doubt- ed and at length denied the exiflence of a firft caufe independent of nature, and of a providence that fu- perintends its laws, and governs the concerns of mankind. That great doftrine, which is the moil; powerful guardian of virtue and religion, and which of ali others has the moft clTcftuai tendency to influence our hopes and fears, I mean the doftrine of ,a future ftate, was totally rejected by the greater part of the Pagan philofophers ; and rendered doubtful and equivocal by their mofl diftinguiflied moralifls. It vas taught and even enforced by legiflators from motives of policy ; while to philofophy was refer ved the privilege of contradifting it in the fchools. Some of the philofophers, indeed, contended for a future exiftence, in which no moral difpcnfation of rewards and punifhments was to take place : for af- ter the expiration of the Great Year the Stoics fup- pofed, that the fame fyflem would arifc ; after the general conflagration, the fam.e train of events would follow ; the fame number of beings exift, and aft in the fam.e circumfl;ances ; the fame virtues be deprelT- ed, and the fame vices triumphant, in endlefs and un- alterable fucceiiion. • Even thofe who may be jnftly efl:eemed the wifefl and moft yirtuons that the Pagan world could boaft of, in cffeft cverthrev^ the do^brine they have been fup- pofed to patronize. They defended its influence on human conduft, by admitting it only under the idea of a reunion vath the nature of the Deity ; the great eternal. je SERMON iii. eternal one, from whom all fouls proceed, aiicl into "whofe all comprehending eifence they are at death refolved again ; and like a bubble burfl and loft in the parent ocean, are fwallowed up in the immen- iity of God ; and thus all peribnal identity and fepa- rate confcioufnefs are /or ever extinguilhed. Tliis is the fubhme of Pagan philoiophy, exalted by the joint power of metaphyfics and theology ! The fuperftitions of the Heathen world were as op- pofitc to the genius of Chriltian worlliip, as its phi- iofophy was adveiie to the principles of its faith. They were fuch as were repu;i,nant to every rule of devotion laid dov;n by cur blelTed lord. They v.xrc fuch as could not be mixed with the Chriltian rites by any arts of accommodation ; by any modes of melioration, or refniement. On the contrary, they were altogether to be reje£led ; and the very founda-- tipn pn which they were reared and fupported vv-as to be totally deftroyed. For the worlliip which was et> tabhfhed in the Pagan world, was not merely abfurd ; it was impious in the extreme. It was debauched by an idolatry, which had a multiplicity of the moll ex- ecrable divinities for its objects. The gods of the heathen, who at beft were but juft lifted : b^vc hu-^ manity, were in a thoufand inflances funk below it, by crimes that were a difgrace to nature, and by cru- elties that would fiiock even the moft barbarous fav- age. I'hofe rights which pohcy had confecrated to their altars, and which ignorance revered with ftupid ;idmiration, frequently degenerated into fccnes of madnefs, lacivioufneis, and cruelty. Their oracles their auguries, and their facrificcs j their public fpec- tacles, and fplcndid games ; yea, the whole appara- tus of Pagan fuperflition were the engines of politir cal tyranny, and of popular delufion, and barred all. -.iccefs to the entrance cf truth ?.nd freedom, purity and fimplicity. Tq - S K R M O- N III. 77 To the oppofition which arofe on thefe grounds, we may add another fource of difiike, which prevail- ed more efpccially among the fubjcds of the Roman empire, to the founder, and the firit preachers, of the Chriftian religion. They were Jews : and of all chara(^ers, that of a Jew was the moil defpifed , and abhorred among the gentiles. The diilinclion which this people claimed, was oifenfive and mortifying to other nations ; and the contrariety of their civil cuftoms and m.odes of Tvorfhip to the pradicc of the whole v/orld, rendered them the objefts of univcrfal deteftation. A religion originating with a Jevf, and fupported by perfcns of the fame cHaracler, had, independently of every other circumllance, but little profpeft of gaining profelytes -mong the gentiles ; efpecially gentiles of the more poliilied ftates. They v/ould naturally allbciate with it their ideas of the Jewilli charader ; and the abhor- rence excited by the one, would be extended, without Lcfitation and without diftinftion, to the other. I have thus attempted to fet before you fome of the principal caufes of the oppofition which was made to the firit propagation of chriflianity. The fuccefs of the gofpei in the time of cur bleff- ed Lord, was truly aRoiiifliing, if we confider who he was, and Vvhat he had to .encounter. But its more rapid and extenfive propagation after his death. Is a circumftance that excites frill higher admiration. DeRitute of all human advantages, protecied by no .-•uthority, afTifted by no art ; not recommended by the r'^pucatioii of its 'author, not enforced by' eloquence in Its advpcatcs, the zvord of Gcd grciu rraghtih and prevailed. ^ Tv/elve" men, poor, and artlef?, and illit- ::rate, we behold triumphing over the fircefl and m.oft determined oppontion ; over the tyranny of the mag- iftrate, and the -fubt| sties of the. philofopher ; over the prejudices of ths Gentile, andthe biffotry of the ^- .^ ^ 'Jew. ;8 SERMON III. Jew. They eflabliflied a religion, wiiich held forth hi^^h and venerable myileries, fuch as the pride of man would induce him to fufpc(^, becaufe he could i-Gt perfectly comprehend them ; which preached doctrines pure and fpirituai, fuch as corrupt nature •Wcis prone to oppofc, becaufe it fhrunk from the fe- .Vc r>.ty of their difcipline ; which required its follow- ers to renounce almoft every opinion ihey had em- .braced as facred, and every intereft they had purfued as important ; which even expofed tliem to every ifpecies of danger and infamy ; to pcrfecution un- merited and unpitied ; to the gloom of a prifon, and to the pangs of death. Hopelefs as thii profpec^ might appear to the view of fhort fighted man, the gofpci yet emerged from the obfcurity in which it was ..likely to be overwhelmed by the complicated dillreffes of its friends, snd the unrelenting cruelty of its foes. Il iucceeded in a peculiar degree, and in a peculiar manner ; it derived that fuccefs from truth ; and ob- tained it under circumftanccs, where falfehood muft have been detcfted and crufhed. In vain therefore has the infiduous Ingenuity of the infidel and fceptic been employed in the prepof- • terous endeavour of accounting for the miraculous fuccefs of chriftianity from caufcs merely human. The true philofopher, who will reft fatisfied with no caufe but what is fully adequate to the effefts produc- ed, readily acknowledges the aiTiilance of God, in the witnefs he bare to the preaching of the-Apoftles, by many figns, and Vv'onders, and mighty deeds. The rational advocate for chriilianity fcorns to flieiter himfelf in fceptical and difmgenuous mifrepre- fentation. He knov/s the force of fecondary caufes ; 1)2 with well founded exultation employs them as ad- _diuonal arguments for the fouiidnefs of his faith ; he derives the flronp^ed fupport from their admirable and ilriking ccnfillence with the pretenfions of a re- iirionr SERMON III. 79 ligion, which difclaimed the ufe of thofe engines by >vhich impoiiurc is ulVially maintained, the intrigues, I mean, of policy, and the violence of arms. But he, at the fame time, contends, that while the interefts of the gofpel were promoted by thofe circumflances which muft have been fatal to every falfc religion, they were chiefly and primarily promoted by other and more eflicacious methods ; by the power of God, which enabled the founder of Chriflianity to perform what unaided man never performed ; and by the wifdom of God, v.-hich affified him in fpeaking as man never fpake. A living writer, the elegance of whofe flyle feems to have conferred a very alarming popularity on the licentioufnefs of his opinions,. ha3 a.lligncd tlie recep- tion of Chriftianity to five causes ; each of which he has reprefented, as in reality uncorxiieQ:ed Vv^ith any divine interpofition. Firfl, " * the inflexible and intolerant zeal of the firft Chriilians, derived from the Jews, but purified from the unfocial fpirit, which had deterred the Gen- tiles from embracins; the law of Mofes." Now, zeal w^'iich is at once intolerant, and purified from any unfocial fpirit, is a quality, which w^e leave to the fingularity of this writer to conceive, and to his eloquence to defcribe. But we deny the fact, that any kind or any degree of intolerance exiRed among the primitive Chriftians : and as to their zeal, we maintain that it did not bear the flightefl fimihtude to the fiercenefs and bigotry of the Jews. It was derived from very different caufes, and aimed at far nobler ends. It was not the nar- rovv' and temporal interefts of one nation, but the general reformation, and the fpiritual happinefs of the whole world, which the teachers of Chriflianity were * Gibbon's liifl. of the Decline ana Fall of the R^moa Empire, p. 536. cdi:. 4to. 1777. So *S E R M O N III. were anxious to promote. That Rrmncfs, v.hich may be mifconftrued into intolerance, and that afliv- it)\ which we are content to call by the name of zeal, h id, in the ufual courle of human affairs, a tendency to retard, rather than to facilitate the propagation of Ihc gofpel. The Chriftian, inflead of falhng into the fafhionable and popular intercommunity of worfhip, difdained, amidfl the terrors of impending death, to throw incenie on the alter of Jupiter : he boldly pro- nounced the whole fyflem of Pagan mythology im- pollure ; and charged the whole ritual of its external devotions, with groveling fuperllition, and profane idolatry. A fecond caufe he finds " in the dodrine of a fu- ture life." Such a doctrine, doubtlefs, is congenial to the nature of man as an accountable and moral agent ; it is repeatedly infifted upon in the gofpel, and muft ultimately, and in a favourable flate 61 things, have increafed in its efficacy. But the future life taught by the Apoilles had few recommendations in the fight of the Heathen world. It was offenfive to the Epicureans by the punifhments it threatened : it was not attraftive to the vulgar by the very rewards: which it propofed. The pride of the philofopher was fhocked by the doctrine of a refurredion, the mode of which he was unable to comprehend : the imaginations of other men were feebly imprelTed by the reprefentation of a future flate, which did not hold out the ferene fky, the verdant garden, and the luxurious enjoyments of an Elyfium. A third caufe he finds in " the miraculous power*? aifcribed to the primitive church;"' and then pro- ceeds, in a ftyle of the mod contemptuous and brttey derifion, to infmuate that thefe pov/crs vvcfe never poflefred. Now, the hardiefl: adverfarles of the gofpel, a Por- phyry, n Celfus and a Julian, do net deny the exift- ence- ' S E R ivi O N ih, 8i * ence of thofe miracles : and Chrlfllanity has little to fear from the improbable caufes to which thefe writ- ers impute them. It is, however, worthy of remark, that when Chrif- tianity was pubHfhed, a general prejudice in the people, and a very fevere fpirit of fufplcion in the government, prevailed againfh the belief of miracles. They were ftigmatifed by the approbrious appella- tion of Magic : and Auguftus, it is well known, had published very rigorous edifts againft the whole race t)f Prasftioiators, The peculiar difficulties, which obfiiruftea the re- ception of Chriftian m.iracles have been explained Svith great acutenefs of reafoning, and great depth of erudition, by a modern writer, whofe remarks defeat indeed the fallacies, but feem to have efcaped the liotice of our ingenious and mdefatigable hiftorian. The fum of his arguments I will give in his own xvords. * " The multitude of popular gods admitted amongft the Heathens did byn'sceifary confequence oc- cafion fuch a multitude of pretended miracles, that they infenfibly loj? their force, and /link in theiir ef- teem. Though the philofophers in general, and men of reading and contemplation, could not but difcover the grcfihefs and abfurdity of the Civil Religion ; yet this could have little effedt on the Vulgar, or them- feives : not on the Vulgar, becaufe It was the bufmefs of the wifeft and mod politic heads zealoufly to fup- port and encourage them in their practices ; not on ibenifelvesi, becaufe if they defpifed their Gods, they mull defpife their miracles too/' Now, under thefe circumftances, miracles afcrihcd to the firft propagators of chriHianity, mufl have cre- ated an immediate and ftubborn prejudice againft their caufe : and nothing could have fubdued that prejudice, but miracles really and vifibly preformed* F A fourth * Weflon en the Reje«^on cf Chriftian Miracles by the Heathen, p, 348, % S.2 SERMON III. A fourth Caufe Is " the virtues of the firil Chrif- tians ;'* which are themfelves reduced to a mean and timid repentance for former fms, and to an impetu- ous zeal in fupporting the reputation of the fed new- ly embraced. Butfurelyin the eyes of the haughty and jealous Romans, fuch repentance and fuch zeal muft have equally excited oppofition to chriilianity. The firll: would have provoked contempt among perfons of their daring felf fufficiency ; and the other would have awakened the jealoufy of the magiftrate. True it. is, that the Chriflians had virtues of a nobler kind. It is alfo true, that thofe virtues did ultimately tri- umph over the fcorn and malice of their foes : and it is true, that a religion producing fuch effects on its followers, and deriving fuccefs from fuch means car- ries with it a prefumptive proof of which impofture never could boaft. The laft fecondary Caufe mentioned by this writ- er, " is the union and difcipline of the Chriflian church.'* We acknowledge the force of union in fecuring the order, and enlarging the interefts of every fociety % and we heartily wifh, that fuch union could be found in the earher ages of the gofpel. But the diftrac- tions and internal diviHons of the Chriflians prefent a very different profpett. And if the gofpel fucceed- ed, not only amidfl; the furious affaults of its enemies, but the no lefs violent contentions of its friends, we mufl look for its fuccefs in fome other caufe, thaa thofe which our hiflorian has affigned. Obfervations fmiilar to thefe have been mofl prop- erly produced, and mofl ably enforced by various writers, who have repelled the bafe and difrngenuous affaults of this mofl dangerous enemy. But in review- ing the circumflances which attended the propagation of the gofpel, I could not, confnliiiitly with the fpirit SERMON III. 8 J t)f this Inftitution, avoid taking fome notice of his treacherous and infiduous endeavours to undermine this important argument for the truth of our faith : ncr could I negleO fo favourable an opportunity as the prefent, of cautioning the younger part of my audience, againft being \m\varily feduced into an ap- probation of his fentiments, by the infinuating arts of his fophiftry, and the captivating graces of his lan- guage. We are by no iheans infenfible to the merits of our hiflorian ; but at the fame time we know and lament his eagernefs to throw a veil over the deformities of the Heathen theolog}'^ to decorate with all the fplen- dor of panegyric the tolerant fpirit of its votaries, to degrade by difingenuous infmuation, or by farcaftic fatire, the im.portance of revelation, to exhibit in the mofl oiTenfive features of dlftortion the weaknefles ^ and the follies of its friends, and to varnifh over the Cruelties, dnd exalt the wifdom of its mercilefs and Imrelehting enemies. I lliali nov/ conclude this difcourfe by briefly enu- rtieratiTig a few particulars, -Vv-hich have been already offered to your confideration, in the courfe of thefe inquiries into the rife: and propagation ofMahome- tifni and chriftianity. It has been already fliewn, from the exprefs and univerfal tefdmony of hiflory, that every circum- ftance of the times, every particular in the manners and fituation of mankind, plainly and undeniably concurred to favour the fuccefs of Mahometan im- poflure. We have now feen, from the fame undoubted au- thority, that^he religion of Chrift, as its firft appear- imce in the world, (humanly fpeaking) laboured un- der all poffiblc difadvantages ; and that every appar- ent probability was ftrongly and decifively againil its fuccefs. Fa The 84 SERMON m. The gofpel was not, like the Mahometan impol^ ture, propofed to a people rude and uncivilized, or at a time when univerfal ignorance and barbarifm had prepared mankind to receive, without hefitation, any impreffions from the artful and defigning ; but in an age, which perhaps above all others, was diftinguifli- ed for curious fpeculation, and philofophical refearch. The Roman empire was at that time in its full glory ; and a long and profound peace, together with the patronage and encouragement of authority, had con- tributed to raife the arts and faiences to a height unknown before j and which later ages, with all their boafted improvements, have fcarce been able to exceed. At fuch a period did the religion of Chrifl invite, and endure, the tefl of the feverefl fcrutiny : till, at length, like pure gold, it came forth unfuUied, and undiminifhed from the flames. We have obferved that the Arabian impofture ow- ed much of his fuccefs to the artful accommodation of his religion to the ruling paflions, the favourite opinions, and the inveterate prejudices of his coun- trymen. But the gofpel prefented itfelf to mankind with a feverer and a chafter afped. Far from con- defcending to flatter the appetites and pafTions, it flridly enjoined its followers the hard and unpleafmg. taflc of plucking out even the eye, and cutting off the hand, that gave occafion of offence. Far from feeking to recommend itfelf to popular favour by complying, and accommodating tenets ; it directly and openly oppofed almofl every opinion and every prejudice of thofe to whom it was offered. The great and powerful principle of national pride, which pleaded ftrongly in favour of the pre- tentions of Mahomet, formed one of the moft ftub- honi and formidable obflacles that oppofed the pro-*' grefs of the gofpeL Called SERMON III. v^' Called forth to fight the battles of the Lord againfl an unbelieving world, and confident of viftory from the promife of a divine afTiftance lor ever at hand, the Arabian beheld in the religion of bis warlike pro- phet the grand and onfy inftrument which could raife his country from obfcurity to glory, from weaknefs and contempt to power and dominion- But to the Jewifli people Chriftianity prefented no fuch flattering views. Its grand and fundamental doctrine, faith in an humble, fuffering Melliah, ob- fcured the brigheft profp ds, and overthrew the fair- ed opinions, \yhich a long and uninterrupted tradi- tion, apparently fupported by prophecy, had taught them to entertain. Their firlT: flep towards embrac- ing the gofpei, was founded on the ruin of every hope which ambition had infpired ; and previoufly to their converfion, they were called upon for ever to renounce their dearefl expeclations of brilliant con- quefts and unbounded dominion under the aulpicious guidance of a mighty and triumphant deliverer. They could not therefore but look with indignation on the progrefs of a religion, which tended to deprive them of their peculiar privileges and diftindions ; to confound them again with the mafs of mankind ; and to reduce them from that haughty preeminence which they had hitherto claimed, to the fame level with the furrounding nations, whom they had been accuftomed to fhun with pious abhorrence, or to fpurn with fullen contempt. By an artful intermixture of the favourite cere- monies and fantallic rites of Arabian idolatry with the new modes of worfhip, which he enjoined ; and by a ftudied accommodation of his flyle and manner to the prevailing paflion for the language and orna- ments of poetry, the fagacious im^poHor facilitated the reception of his dodrines among his countrymen. F 3 ^ But B6 SERMON III. But the religion of Jefus Chrifl could boafl no fuch advantages. As it oppofed the pride, and the preju- iA dices of the Jews, fo was it equally hoftile to every prepoffellion of the G entiles. To the vulgar, attached as they were to the licen- tious feflivals, the folemn proccflions, and the pomp- ous pageantries of heathenifm, the pure and fpiritual worlhip of chriftianity difplayed no charms : while the more enlightened among them, enamoured of the fubtleties of human wifdom, and bewildered . in the mazes of an abfurd and unintelligible philofophy, were unwilling to believe that the piainnels and fim- plicjty of the gofpel could ever be worthy an omnif- - cient God. Laflly, the gofpel was not, like the impoflure of Mahomet, impofed upon the fubjeft nations by the ftern command of a conquering tyrant ; nor \vas it for the {pace of full 300 years, even indireftly counte- nanced by any itifluence of government and authori- ty : on the contrary, we behold with allonifliment, the pomp of adverfe power, no lefs than the pride of learning, and the arrogance of philofophy, refilling its influence by a long and perfevering perfecution, but bowing, at length before the plain and artiefs preaching of the poor, the weak, the illitera,te fifher- men of Galilee. To fuch flupendous effe£l;s an adequate caufe muil be ailigned. A revolution fo aftonifliing, accompliihed, by in- ftruments fo evidently weak and difproportioned, and under circumftances fo adverfe and unfavourable^ naturally teaches us to look higher ; to elevate our views far above the reach of human ftrength and wif- dom, even to tiiat Almighty Being, from lubMi alone, dometh every good and e'uery perjed gift. '■ ■ • • ■ SERMON SERMON IV. — «»^J€>H€»H:redit and authority were founded, endeavour- ed to impede his progrefs, firll: by fevere and repeated menaces, and at length by attual violence. Even the multitude, on his firft pubUc appearance in the char- acter of prophet, ridiculed his pretences, and infult- ed him with. the odious appellations of a magician and an impoftor. Under circumftances thus difcduraging, amidfl: the clamours of the unthin^cing, the fufpicions of the unprejudiced, and the abhorrence even of the virtu- ous, the bold and determined impoflor remained un- moved. Unfhaken in his purpofes, and regardlefs. of the dangers and difficulties that furrounded him, oppofition, inftead of damping his courage, or repreif- ing his ambition, ferved only to confirm his refolu- tion, and to increafe his activity. Apparently infen- iible to every infult that was offered, he applied him- feif with umvearied affiduity to all ranks and diftin^c- • G 2 tigns ted SERMON IV. tions of men. By the charms of his convcrfation,, and by the elegance of his manners, he obtained the favour of the great : he fought to gain the afieclions of the poor, by condefcending to mix with them in all the habits of familiar intercourfe, and by relieving their diitreffes with a liberal and unfparing hand : by unremitted endeavours to pleafe, and by a con- Itant exertion of thofe arts of infmuation which he fo eminently pofTefied, he gradually conciliated the af-* fedions of all. Thus, in defiance of all oppofition, the exalted ge- nius, the manly and perfuafive eloquence, the con- fummate policy, and the alluring doctrines of the new prophet, daily augmented the number of his difci- ples. Compelled, however, at length to efcape, by a pre- cipitate flight, the lafh defperate effort of" his exafper- ated foes ; he found a fecure and an advantageous retreat in a place * whither his reputation had alrea- dy reached. Here, by an exertion of the fame dili- gence, and by the pradice of the fame artifice, he ibon found himfelf enabled to collect a confiderable number of followers, whofe belief in his miffion wai firmly eilablifhed, and whofe zeal for the propagatioii of his religion, and the fupport of his clitira£ter as a prophet, was too ftrong to be Ihaken by any threats of danger or of death. With increafmg powder the impatience and the ambition of the impollof alfo increafed. The view of empire feems nov/ to have opened more fully and clearly upon him : and, unable to wait for the tedi- ous operation and uncertain effect of argument and of reafon, he now pretended to have received the di- vine command to unflieath the fword of the Almighty, and to fubdue by the violence of arms, thofe who had been obfiinately deaf to the voice of pcrfuafion. Mahomed * IWcdJra.- S E R M O N IV. 10 1 Mahomet had hitherto nfted the darker and more difp"uifed part of the crafty deceiver, and the pro- found poUtician ; but without negleding thefe arts, he now began to affume alfo another charafter, and to difplay the more fplendid talents of a commander and a hero. The firft anions, however, with which he commenced his military career, refemble the irreg- ular exploits of the robber, more than the fyflemat- ical operations of the warrior ; and feem to have been influenced rather by a rapacious defire of plun- der, than by a pious zeal for the converfion of un- believers. But enriched by the fpoils, and aggran- dized by the fame of his fucceffes, he was foon ena- bled to engage in attempts of greater and more ex- tenfive importance. The rapidity of his attacks, the fagacity of his ftratagems, and the boldnefs of his defigns, aided by the enthufiailic va,lour VA^th which he had infpired Ilis troops, foon rendered him fuperior to his numer- ous adverfaries. Whilil the flame of fanaticifm, which he himfelf had kindled, burnt furioufly in eve- ry breaft around him., he alone cool and deliberate in the midft of flaughtcr and confulion, marked every movement of the enemy, took advantage of every er- ror, and leftno artifice unemployed to obtain and to fecure the victory. The conduct of Mahomet to- ■Avards thofe whom his arms had conquered, was dif- ferent under different circumftances : according afi interefl. required, or policy directed, we behold it now difliinguiflied by an ofbcntation of the moft he- roic clemency, and now ftained with all the exccfics of fefocious cruelty. When mild and gentle m.ea- fures feemed bell calculated to conciliate the affec- tions of thofe whom defpair might render formidable, we behold him. with an air of affected generoiity dif- jniffmg thoufands of his captives. V/hen afts of fe- yerity appeared expedient, to intijoiida^te the obllinute. 102 S E R M O N IV. we behold hini brJely taking vengeance on the falkr, and with every circumllance of deliberate and fav;;rg't barbarity, imbruing his hands in the blood of the concjiwered. ^ To the fagacious ftatefman, and even to the candid philofopher, Mahomet has fometimes appeared rather fevere from policy, than cruel by nature. But this apology, in the view of unprejudiced reafon and of genuine philanthropy, aggravates furely the guilt it is meant to extenuate. For the neceflity which ufur- pation creates, the ufurper is always refponfible ; and of him who fteeps his fv/ord in the blood of thoufands, who difdains tamely to facrifice their ancient and moil facred rights to lawlefs ambition, what Ihail we fay, but that he adds barbarity to injuftice ; that he punifhes the fuppofed offence which his own outrages' had provoked ; and executes with calm delibera- tion thofe fchemes of deftrudion, which even the fudden impetuofity of paflion is infufHcient to palliate ? A difpofition naturally cruel may be correfted by time, or controled by circumftances. But when the tender feelings of the heart are overpowered by the fuggeflions of the underflanding ; when thofe fuggeftions are adopted from choice, and confirmed by habit ; when they feize every opportunity, and ruih into every extreme ; when they call in artificial fever- ity to promote artificial utility, and thus purfue a bad end by the very word means ; the enormities of am- bition become more criminal in their motives, and more pernicious in their effetls. Inftinttive cruelty a^us only irregularly and by ftarts ; but a voluntary and fyflematic difregard to the peace of mankind ir, more conftant and more terrible in its operations. The formet cruihes only thofe perfons who with, or "without reafon, are the objefts of refentment : the latter fpares not a friend, who appears in the charac- ter of a rival ; and cruflies everv feeming or real ob- ftacle IV. fo3 llacle to its reiiioteil views, without difliiiftion and without hefitation. He that is barbarous from na^ ture, may fometimes be overtaken by compunflion, and review his crimes with deteilation and horror. He that deflroys his fellow creatures for the fake of perfonal advantages arifmg from their deftrudion, not only provjdes an excufe for his outrages, but fane- tifies cruelty with the name of wifdom ; and refle6ls, it may be, upon his fuccefs with unfeeHng indiffer- ence, or perhaps with favage exultation. The argu- ment alledged in favour of Mahomet unqueftionably amounts to a full and decifive proof, that Mahomet- ifm itfelf could not have been eflabhfhed without violence. We readily admit the faft ; and we are juitified in drawing from it fuch conclufions as are mod difhonourable to the genius of the religion itfelf, and to the chara6ler of its author. We now pafs oa to .another flriking feature in th^ character of Mahomet, His numerous and fplendid victories were not on- ly the efficacious means of extending his power, and of realizing the hopes which ambition had infpired ; but they were alfo eventually fubfervient to the gratifica- tion of a paflion lefs generous indeed, though not lefs violent in its impulfes, or lefs forcible in its influ- ence on the human heart. Whilft the vv retched vic- tims of his power were facrlficed to his cruelty or his policy, a ftill feverer fate awaited the female captive ; who v/as compelled to (ubmit to the bafe and inordi- nate defires of a barbarian conqueror, and was forced into thofe arms which were flained with the recent flaughter of a friend, a brother, or a, parent. From every view of the life of INTahomet, and even from the partial reprefentations of his zealous und infatuated foUov/ers, it is evident that ambition and, lull were the paflions which divided the empire of his breafl. From the feparate, or united inlluencc of ^ ■ G 4 the'c ■ I04 S E R M O N IV. thefe powerful principles, it would not be difficult ta trace almofh every great defign, and every important aftion of his life. Hence originated the grand and ftupendous fcheme of his impofture ; and hence we obferve each fubordinate part throughout its whole contexture, pointing immediately or ultimately to the gratification of one or both of thefe predominant paffions. During his earlier years, indeed, every meafure feems to have been dictated, and every inferior con- fideration utterly abforbed by an unvaried attention to the purfuits and the interefls of ambition. The nature of his undertaking, particularly in its firft ftages, required no common degree of prudence ai),d caution. That policy which formed fo diftinguifliing' a part of his character, doubtlefs compelled him for a while to conceal, if not to reflrain, the indulgence of irregular paffions : left the Iftentioufnefs of his manners (hould give offence to thoie whofe good opinion it was his objeQ: to conciliate ; and the im- morality of his pradice, by betraying the fecret mo- tives and propenfities of his heart, Ihould unravel the web which his hypocrify was weaving, before it had acquired fufficient ftrength and confiftence. Hence, both before, and during the firfl years of his pretended miffion, whilft his daring fchemes were yet immature, and their fuccefs uncertain, the artful im- poftor, as we have reafon to believe, regulated every part of his condud by the flrift rules of external de- corum. But no fooner v/as his reputation as a pro- phet eftabliihed ; no fooner was his authority rooted too firmly to be fhaken by any common or ordinary event, and his ambition in fome meafure fatiated by the pofleffion of power, than another paffion arofe ; and fliaking off the reftraint which had hitherto fup- preffed it, with a violence equally arbitrary, now hur- ried him away into the wildeft extravagancies. At SERMON IV. 105 At length his attention to the cold and jealous cau- tions of prudence c'eafed with its neceflity ; and iron^ an affectation of exemplary purity of manners, he now rufhed into the mod pubHc and criminal exceffes of fenfual indulgence. That addrefs to the carnal ap- petites, which permitted them fo liberal an indulgence in the prefent Hfe, and promifed their complete and eternal gratification in another, was one of the moft alluring fnares which he fo fuccefsfully fpread to cap- tivate his countrymen. The laws which he prefcrib- ed for the regulation of thefe palTions, were too loofe for the moft compliant moraliil to juftify ; and top favourable to afford the moft abandoned fenfuaHft any probable ground of complaint. But the boundlefs luff of Mahomet difdalned to be confined even within the extenfive limits which he had drawn for his followers. It was reafonable that the prophet fiiould be diftinguilhed above the reft of mankind by exclufive privileges ; and that his appe- tites and paffions fiiould be indulged with an appro- priate and pecuHar licence. Sole mafter of the ora- cles of heaven, he ever compelled them to fpeak that language, which was beft adapted to his defigns. Hence he was poffeffed of an unfailing refource under every exigency ; and thus a fatisfaClory anfwer was always prepared to folve every objedion, and to re- move every fcruple, which the malice of his enemies, or the pious doubts of his friends might raife againft him. Hence we behold the God of purity himfelf introduced to fanctify and approve the fenfual im- moraHties of his prophet, and to filence the murmurs of his profane or fhort fighted followers ; who had been weak enough to imagine, that the fame laws, which were obligatory on the vulgar, likewife ex- tended their fanftion to the facred and venerable charafter of the apoftle. ' I will ic6 SERMON IV. I will not prefume to fliock the feelings of this au* dience by a nearer profpect of the chamber of thi? prophet : indeed the mod abandoned Hbertine woukl blulh at the particular reprefentation of the horrid and difgufling fcenes v/nich there unfold themfelves to our aftonilhed view. It is therefore fufiicient to obferve in general, that the retirements of Mahometj frorr^ his firil acquifition of power to his lafl decline of life, were continually difgraced by every excef- five indulgence of that paffion, which has a more particular tendency to degrade the dignity of the hu,- man character even below the brute creation. That Qod bearetb not fuincrs, is a diciate of com- mon nature : and doubtlefs to a people who enjoy- ed a higher degree of civilizatibn, or whofe ideas of morality were purer and more refined than thofe of the Arabians at that perjod, thefe ftriking blemiilies in the chara&er of their prophet, wpuld have been fufficient at lead to have excited the firongefl fufpic- jons againft: his fmcerity, if not abfolutely to hiwe overthrov/n his pretenfiqns to a divine comrnunica- . tion. But if the decifion of the Arabs had been in any degree influenced by uncorrupt reafon, they would have difcovered objedions equally unanfwerable in other prominent and difiinguifhiiig features of their great legiflator. • There is no ftronger or more infallibly criterian of truth and falfehood, than confiilency. To fupport an aifumed character with perfect uniformity, and to preferve a regular confiftency of conduct under eve- ry circumftance, and in every fituation of an adtive and varied life, is a talk perhaps too hard for the fa- gacity of the mod ftvilful impoftor to accompliih. There are moments, in which the propenfitics of na- ture v/ill fhew themfelves, and, with irrefiftiblc vio- lence, break through every artificial reftraint which, policy J^ E R M O N IV. xoji policy may impofe, Befides, he vho condufts a plan orinipollure, and confequently wliofe faccefs depends folejy on the machinations of human prudence, is under a neceffity of" accommodating every defign to external circumflaiices : fo that his conduQ: will of courfe, be ever found to v^ry with his fituation. Hence the fierce pafTions of Mahomet, u'tiich even in the earlier periods of life, when their influence is moll powerful had been compelled to bend the views of ambition and the diftates of policy, no fooncr felt the immediate danger of indulgence remo'ted, than they impetuoufly tranfgreffed every reftraint of deco- tum, and even boldly bade defiance to the laws of juftice and the obligations of morality. Hence, as intereft required, he now flattered the pride of the Jews, and now appealed to the prejudices of the Arabs : now felefling the temple of Jeru- falem, and now that of Mecca, a$ the hallowed fpot tov.'ards which the worfhip and the prayers of his fol- lowers fnould be directed. Hence too, at the com- mencement of his impoflure, we find him humble and yielding, labouring only by the powers of elo- quence and by the fofter arts of infinuation to capti- vate the affections of his countrymen : but in its more advanced flate, we behold on a fudden the preacher, by divine command transformed into the warrior : we fee his fleps every where marked with blood and defolation, and wc hear him with the flern and ferocious afpeft of a conqueror, propofing death or converfion as the only alternative to his fub- ject foes. Thus in order the more effedually to ac- complidi his own bafe and intereiled defigns, the bold impoflor fcrupled not to fubject even the eter- nal and immutable counfels of the Almighty to the imputati(ni of weaknefs and inconftancy. But of the various dilguifes under which Mrihomet attempted to veil the myfterious plan of his impoflure, none loa SERMON IV. none was more artful in its defign, or more fuccefsr ful in its event, than that profound ignorance, and total want of every kind of literature, to which he conftantly pretended. On this was founded his mod popular and prevailing argument for the truth of that revelation which he profefled to communicate to the world. The elegant flyle of that revelation, the harmony of its fentcnces, and the fubhmity of its conceptions, were univerfally acknowledged. Was it not then abfurd to imagine (as the impoflor fpecl- cufly ar^ed) that a work of fuch extraordinary beau- ty and excellence, could ever have been compofed by a man who was deflitute of every fpecies of ac- quired knowledge, and who by his ignorance even of the common rudiments of early education had been precluded from the perufal of books and the ufe of writing ? To an Arab th^ argument was irrelflible ; and ev- en Chriflian writers, in order to evade its force, have attempted to point out particularly the affociatcsof the impoflor, whom they imagine to have compofed that Koran, which he only delivered to the v/orld. That the ignorance of Mahomet was not real, but affumed (confidering the commerce in which he had been en- gaged, and the intercourfe which he had held with the inhabitants of more poliflied ftates) might have been reafonably fufpefted. But it might alfo have been inferred from proofs of a more dircft and pofi- tive nature. Notwithftanding all his cares and cir- cumfpedion, the malk fometimes, dropped off, and difcovered at once his real charafter, and the falfe- hood of his pretences. By the confeflion of his own hifhorians, there were moments in which his pretended ignorance was for- gotten, and he not only expreffed a defire to exercife, but aftually pradifed that very art, of which he fol-^ emnly and repeatedly profefled himfelf to be totally ignorant. Thus - S ]£ R M O N IV. log Thiis difficult is it, and I might even fay impofliblej for the moll tinifhed and fagacious hypocrite to pre- ferve an afiumed charafter with pcrfedl and unvaried uniformity. For nothing is permanent but truth, and nothing confiltent but fmcerity. If tlie boundlefs ambition of Mahomet had been fatistied with that preeminence to which it might have afpired without a crime ; if he had been con- tent to have ajGTumed only the charaQer of a legifla- tor, and by the fplendid and aftonifhing talents he pof- fefl'ed, to have civilized his barbarous couatrymen, and reclaimed them from idolatry, without the aid of impofture and the impious pretence of divine revela- tion ; if thus glorious had been the object he purfu- ed, and thus innocent the means by which he attain- ed it ; his vices, enormous as they were, might have been overlooked or forgotten amldfi: the fplendor of his virtues ; and we might juftly have ranked him amongfl the mod dlfllngufhed friends and benefac- tors of manldnd. But in the prophet of God, the great reformer of the world, it is natural to expect a more exemplary- purity of manners and ftrider adherence to the laws of morahty : every claim to an office thus facred and venerable excites the fevereft attention, and juftifies the mofl rigid examination : but from fuch a tell the character of Mahomet fhrinks with guilty apprehen- fion ; and however we may at firft view admire ths fpecious virtues and fplendid abilities that adorn it, yet this admiration is quickly loft in abhorrence of the bafe and impious purpofe's to w-hich they became fubfervient. That the impoftor by the opinions which he intro- duced, really improved the manners of the Arabs, cannot perhaps be denied : the religion w^hich he ef- fabliihed, amidft all its errors and abfurdities, polTetT- es many principles in common with the true, and is doubthSs i:a S E R M O N m ifioubtlefs in every refpeft far preferable to that abfurd and monftrous idolatry which was then the prevailing creed of Arabia, But when we confider its more extenfive diffufion and ultimate conl'cqucnces ; \\ hen we refledt on the excellence of that perfed and love- ly fyftem of do£trine and morals which it threaten- ed to deftroy, and whofe. benign influence it Hill con- tinues fatally to obftrufi: ; when we call to mind the immenfe multitudes of our fellow creatures, who are yet involved by its delufions in the moft profound darknef^and error, our opinion concerning him and his impodure is at once determined, and we behold both in their native features of horrid and almoll uii iiiiiced deformity. SE?. SERMON V. II. COR. IV. lo. THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BK MADE MANIFESTt AVING before viewed the life and char- ufter of Mahomet, let us now turn our eyes to a brighter piilure ; where every grace that can recom- mend religion, and every virtue that can adorn hu- manity, are fo blendid as to excite our admiration, and engage our love. Independently, indeed, of all comparifon, the charafter of Jefus Chriil ftands for- ward as the moil llriking and illuftrious reprefenta- tion of "lv bat ever things ore true, or jujl, or of good re- port ; and claims our praife by its ovvn intrinfic ex- cellence. In the life of our blefied Lord we difcover noth- ing that can either create fufpicion, or excite aver- fion ; we fee a thou£md excellencies which the har- diefl enemies of the gofpel are compelled involunta- rily to approve. All that negative virtue can fecure, and all that pofitive merit can attain, appear to have been united with equal luilre in this lovely and ven- erable pattern of Chriftian imitation. But before I defcend to the particulars which it may be necelfary to bring forward in contrafling thfe life of*Chriil with that of Mahomet, I beg your per- ■miffion to introduce fome interefting, and, I hope, notimpertinent refledions on the nature of thathiitor- icai form in which the Chrillian revelation has been tranfmitted to us; This 112 S E R M O N V. This form involves the correftnefs of fyftem wlth^ out its abftrufenefs, and the energy of eloquence without its oftentatibn. It happily unites the bright- nefs of example with the precifion and perfpicui- ty of precept. To the minutenefs of detail which be- longs to biography, it adds much of that regular ar- rangement, and of that vivid colouring, by which the more eminent writers of poetry have endeavoured to mark the diftinguifhing and appropriate qualities of their favourite heroes. Inftead of fdmetimes amuf- ing, and fometimes aftonifliing us, with thofe brilliant, but indiftinft and fleeting impreffions which are ex- cited by general defcriptions, or elaborate panegyric^ it. leads us through a feries of uniform and charader^ iflic actions, into a clear and full knowledge of the agent. It enables, and gently impels the mind to combine by its own operation all the detached in- flances of virtue into one bright affemblage. It tranf- ports the imagination, as it were, into the prefence of the perfon whofe excellencies are recorded, and gives all the finer fenfibilities of the foul an immedi- ate and warm intereft in every word and every ac- tion. Kence, the manner in which the facred writ- ers have defcribed the adions of Chrift, not only irt- creafes the efiicacy of his inftrudions, but conftitutes a new, a ftrikirtg, and peculiar fpecies of evidence for the truth of his religion. This pofitiori it may be of ufe for us to illuftrate yet further. To compare the charader of Socrates with that of Chrifl, is foreign to our prefent purpofe : but of the manner in which their lives have been rcfpeftively written, we may properly take fome notice. On the hiftory of Socrates then, have been employed the ex- quifite tade of Xcnophon, and the fublime genius of Plato. The virtues of this extraordinary man are" feleded by ihem as the noblefl fubjeds for the fulicft difplav SERMON V. II dlfplay and mon; adive exertion of their talents ; and they have brought to the tafi<, not merely the fagaci- ty of philofophers, but the aficclion of friends, and the zeal of enthufiafts. Now the different ftyle of their writings, and the different tempers as well as capacities of the writers themfelves, have produced fom.e variety both in the fcenes in which they have exhibited their mafter, and in the opinions which they have afcribed to him. But in the compofition of each, Socrates is dillin- guHhed by a noble contempt of popular prejudice, and perverted fcience ; by an ardent admiration and fteady purfuit of virtue ; by an anxious concern for the moral improvement of his hearers ; and by an heroic fupetiority to the pleafures of life, and to the terrors of impending death. What his illuftrious bi- ographers have performed in fuch a manner as to engage the attention, and excite the adtniratlon of fuccelfive ages, has been accom.plifhed with yet greater fuccefs by the facred writers. They have attained the fame end under heavier difficulties, and by the aid of means, which if they are confidered as merely human, mufl: furely be deemed inadequate to the tafk which they undertook. They were by no means diftinguiihed by literary attainments, or by intellec- tual powers. Their education could not beflow on them very exalted or correal ideas of morality ; and their writings were dcftitute of every recommendation from the artificial ornaments of flyie. Yet have thefe four unlearned men effefted by their artlefs fimplicitv a vvork, to which the talents of the two greatelt \vriters of antiquity wete not more than equal. They have exhibited a character far more lovely in itfelf, and far more venerable, than httion has ever painted ; and in their mode cf exhibiting it, they fur- pafs the fidelity, the diftinftnefs, and precifion, which two of the mod celebrated writers have been able to preferve, v.licn exerting the whole powers of their H genius. ii4 S E R M O N v. genius, end actuated by the fondeft attachment, the/ were endeavouring to do jultice to the noblefl pattern of real virtue of which antiquity can boafl. In Jelus have \.he Evangeliits defcribed brighter and more numerous virtues, than Socrates is faid even by h^s pro^efled admirers to have pofleiled. In their def- criptions they have without effort, and under the in- fluence, it mull be allowed, of llncere conviction only, maintained a greater uniformity than the moll prejudiced reader can difcover in the beautiful com- pofitions of Plato and Xenophon. If the dcfire of communicating their own favour- ite opinions, or the mutual jealoufy of literary fame, be ailigned as a reafoh for the diverfity of reprefenta- tion m the two Greek writers, we allow the proba- bility of both fuppofitions ; but we contend, that each of thefe motives is inconfiltent with that love of truth, which is neceffary to cltablifli the credibility of a biographer, We alfo contend, that the Evan- gelifts v/erc really poffefled of this excellent quality ; that they never deviated from it, in order to indulge their enmity or envy ; and that, v/ith apparent marks of difference in their language, their dilpofitions, and perhaps in their abilities, they have yet exhibited the character of Chriff the moil flriking, if their narra- tives be feparatcly confidered ; and the moll confifl- ent, if they be compared with each other. Be it ob-' ferved too, that the difiiculty of preferving that con- fidence increafes both with the pecuHarity and mag- nitude of the excellencies defcribed, and with the number of the perfons who undertake the otficeofde- fcribing them. If it be faid, that the fuperior pretenfions of Ghriff,- as a divine teacher, required more fplendid virtues than what are expe6led from Socrates, who taught, morality upon principles of human reafon only ;■• whence is it that the unpolifhed, uncultivated minds of the evangeliits Ihould even conceive a more mag- S E R M O N V. 115 nificent charader than the imaginations of a Plato, or a Xenophon ? What aids did they apparently pof- fefs for reprcfenting it more advantagcoufly ? That thofe four unlettered men lliould have drawn fuch a character, with more uniformity in the whole, and with ttiore fublimity in the parts, is therefore a fadl which can be accounted for only, by admitting the conftant and immediate guidance cf the Holy Spirit, the real cxirLcnccof Chrilt's perfeciions,and the ftrong and lading imprcffion they made upon thofe who con- verfed with him. Thofe pcrf'edions themfelves were, indeed, extraordinary both in kind and in degree. In iheir kind they are admirable patterns for the condud of Chrilt's followers : and in their degree, they are eminently and indifputably proportioned to the tran- scendent and unrivalled dignity of his own mifiion. Every reader of difcernment is difgufted at the fic- titious reprefentation of " thofe faultlefs monfters ■which the world ne'er faw : every writer of tafle finds it neceffary to procure credit to his reprefenta- tions, by throwing feme fliadcs of error and infirmi- ty over the wifefl and bed of men : every impartial and profound inquirer into the conftitution of the human mind, is aware that the ruling paflion, by xvhich the mod amiable and venerable of men are didinguifhed, fometimes degenerates into excefs ; that the indifcriminate and eager purfuit of virtue itfelf imperceptibly leads into vice ; that the mod illudri- ous characters are didinguiflied by fome predomi- nant excellence ; that he who furpafles his fellow creatures in forae indanceSj falls belov/ them in oth- ers ; and that, among the fons of men, no one has yet exided, in whom every great and good quality, every religious and focial perfection have been at once united. To thefe incontrovertible and general rules, the life of Chrid affords one piorious excention. There \i a variety in his virtues which never {hocks proba- H 2 bility ; . ii6 S E R M O N V. bility ; and at the fame time there is an uniformity which never cieates fatiety. Upon the mod com- mon actions he bellows a novehy in his manner of performing them ; the uncommon he recommends by a fimplicity which adds to their charms, without degrading their dignity. Here, indeed, it becomes me to obferve, that in all his aclions, he, without any appearance of defign, preferves that decorum which the ancient philofo- phers have explained with fo much ingenuity, and , which is utterly beyond the reach of affeftation or im- pofture. In abftaining from licentious pleafures he was equally free from oilentatious fmgularity, and churlifli fullennefs. In partaking, as he fomtimes did, the innocent enjoyments of life, he never fell in- to the gaiety of the Epicurian ; in relinquilhing them, when the great ends of his mifnon required it, he was equally free from the aifumed and unnatural in- fenfibility of the Stoic. When he complied with the eftabliflied ceremonies of his countrymen, that compliance was not accompanied by any marks of bigotry or fuperflition : when he oppofed their root- ed prepofldlions, his oppofition was perfedly exempt from the captious petulance of a controverlialift, and the undiftinguifliing zeal of an innovator. It is well known, that fome virtues owemuchof theii* luftre to local and temporary circumftances ; and that the fame a-Stions which may be highly, nay even jullly extolled in one age or country, are in others furveyed with lifllefs indiiierence. " In antiquity,*' fays an acute obferver, * " the heroes of philofophy, as well as thofe of war and patriotifm, have a grandeur and force of fentiment which ailonilhes our narrow fouls, and is ralhly confidered as extravagant and fupernat- ural. They, in their turn, I allow, would have equal feafon, to confider as romantic and incredible, the degree Hume's EfTaysi SERMON V. 17 degree of humanity, clemency, order, tranquillity, and other fecial virtues, to which in the adminiflra- tion of government we have attained in modern times, had any one been then alive to have made a fair re- prefentation of them.-" The life of Chrift blends thefe oppofite and feem- ingiy irreconcileable excellencies. It avoids their extravagance, and fupplies their defects. The cour- age of our Lord was adive in encountering the dangers to which he was expofed, and paflive under the aesravated calamities which the malice of his foes heaped upon him. Yet his fortitude was re- mote from every appearance of raflmefs ; and his pa- tience was equally exempt from abjeft pufillanimity and flupid apathy. He was firm without obftinacy, and humble v/ithout meannefs. In the the general tenor of his life he tvas mild and gentle ; the promoter of peace amongfi: other men, and the flricleit obferv- er of it in his own behaviour. But v/hen great and real occafions called for different deportment, he dif- played a noblenefs of mind, a contem.pt of danger and death, fuch as the importance of his miffion re quired from him, and fuch as the confcioufnefs of rectitude could alone infpire. To the virtues of Chrift, v/hether we confider them ^s too fublime to excite any fentiments of prefump- tuous emulation, or too rational not to juftify our en- deavours to imitate them ; whether we examine his private or public conduct ; may in ,a nobler feafe be applied the beautiful and animated language, in which a celebrated orator of antiquity has extolled thofe arts, by which he was himfelfdiftinguifhed. " Adolefcen- tiam alunt, feneflutem cbleClant, fecundas res or-, nant, adverfis perfuglum ac folatium prxbcnt, delec- tant domi, non im.pediunt foris, pernodtant nobifcum^ peregrinantuT, ruilicantur.". H 3 Thofe ii8 o L R M O .N \". Thofe virtues indeed, will in no age and no coun- try lofe either their ulefulnefs, their beauty, or tlieir merit. They are, in various degrees practicable ; under every form of government, whether free or defpotic ; under every modification of mannero, v/hether barbarou" or refined ; and in every flate ot knowledge, whether it be imperfect or improved. In the loweit condition of the world, they tend to leflen the miferies and diibrders to which the unfearchable providence of God has fubjected our fpecies : they v^ill increafe the flock of our happinefs, and exalt our nature to Hhe higheft perfection, when accompa- nied by every alTiflance which reafon, v/hich philofd- phy and civilization can bellow in forming the moral or the religious chara£ler of man. Thefe obfervations will, I trufl, both elucidate and juftiiy the biographical form in which Revelation is conveyed to us. God, it is true, might have made known to us his will, by a fcries of laws, by abilract reafonings, by fnort inftru^ive fentences, by copious and reoular fyflems, or bv anv of the various mode's of human compofition. But chriltianity amis at a nobler end, and purfues it by the moll proper and efficacious methods. We read, indeed, the opinions and the belief of Socrates, and the commands and promifes of Mahomet. But by Jefas Chrifl, virtiie of every kind and in every degree, is exemplified as well as taught. He is the pattern as well as the teacher of the duties we are to perform. His pre- cepts fhew us what we ought to praftife ; his conduel convinces us that it is pradicable ; and the rewards which he has offered, are powerful incentives to us to praclife it from the befb motive?, and in the bed manner. His refurre6tion from the grave confTrms our-faith ; his afcenfion to glory animajies our hope^ ; the actions of his life, and the circumflances ot hi?, death, enlarge and invigorate our charity. By thefc means - SERMON V. - 115 jneans all the parts of Chriftlanity form one great «:-id conliltcnt whole ; every moral rule is realized, and becomes a proof of religious truth ; whilll every re- ligious truth, in its turn, iiluflrates and enforces every moral rule. The adlions of God himfelf are, indeed, invifible ; thofe of men are imperfecl ; but the ac- tions of Chnll (confidered in his human characlcr) are both vifible and perfect : they are level to our apprehenfions, and mofl: worthy of our imitation. Religion is thus made intelligible to all, becaufe all are bound to obey it. It is accompanied by a fpecies of demonftration^ which the meaneil cannot mifunderfland ; it is recommended by fuch an in- ftance of its beauty and its ufefulneis, as is calculated to remove every icruplc, and to fiience every objec- tion. To evince the juftnefs of thefe general obfervations I fhall now enter more particularly upon that com- parifon between the charafter of Chrifl and that of Mahomet, to which I am led by the fubjed of thcfc ledures. • The fituation and manners of the Jews at the time W'hen our Lord entered upon his public miniilry, and the oppofition to the gofpel, to which they gave birth have already been the fubjeft of our confideration. We have feen, that- of the many falfe and miibaken. notions which then prevailed among that blind and deluded people, the expedation of a temporal Mefliah was the moftextenfive and moil important. Impa- tient under the galling yoke of fervitude, and blind- ly attached to an opinion, which was at onccfupport- c^d by national pride, and in appearance founded on the literal and expref^ authority of divine revelation ; the people in general, and the vulgar in particular, were eager to admit, and zealous to defend the claims of every pretender to this fplendid charader. Tlje peculiar nature, and wide fpread influence of this H 4 prejudice. 120 SERMON V. prejudice offered the mofl favourable opportunity, and prefented the faireft prolpeft of temporal autho- rity and dominion, which could have been defired by the mofl fanguine and ambitious impoltor. But of this opportunity no advantage was taken by Jefus Chrifl. ,. The plan which he purfued, was in every refpe£t the reverfe of what an interefted deceiver would have concerted, whofe hopes of fuccefs were founded only in the machinations of human pqlicy. His firft public appearance was in the higheft de- gree unpopular, and oppofed to all the prejudices, and all the pride of his countrymen. Inftead of al- luring them by the profpeft of temporal dominion, to which their hopes and expeftations univerfally pointed, he proclaimed the commencement of afpirit- ual and invifible kingdom, little calculated to attract the attention of a people who had never been accuf- tomed to raife their views beyond the objects of fenfe ; and totally inconfiftent with every opinion which had been tranfmitted to them by tradition, and fanctified among them by authority. Inftead of ereQing his vidorious ftandard as the glorious redeemer of Ilrael, their mighty deliverer from the difgraceful bondage of Roman opprcfiion, and from the power of every earthly foe ; he offered them a redemption, more beneficial indeed, though lefr, attradive to the fenfuai mind j a redemption from the dreadful tyranny of death. He Invited them to a deliverance greater in itfelf, though lefs confonant to their wifhes, than ex- emption from fervitude to the Roman power ; a. de- liverance from the yet feverer and more ignominious fiavery of fin. Had intereft, or ambition, been the guide of his aclions, he would certainly have affumed that charac- ter, to which the warmeft hopes and the moft rooted prepoffeffions of the Jews univerfally inclined. He would not have oppofed alike the pride of princes, and S E R U O N V. 121 nnd the fuperftition of the people : he would have either courted popularity, or graiped at dominion ; he, at leaft, would not have taken every meafurc, that had a natural tendency to alarm the jealoufy of the magiftrate, and to provoke the dilpleaiurc of ;hc mul- titude. As ambition had no iliarc in his claims, as his king- dom was neither formed on the policy, nor fupported by the power of the world, he fought not its favour, nor flirunk from its difpleafure. Inftead of labouring to increafe the number of his followers, by an infm- uating flexibility in his ovv'n manners, or by a cor- rupt compliance with their prejudices, he gave oifence by the unaffected plainnefs of the one, and by an un- difguifed oppofition to the other. He difdained to conciliate the affections of any clafs of men, however dignified by their ffation, or formidable for their power, by any bafe or diflionourable conceffions : he did not endeavour to win even their ali'ent by a fur- vile or a treacherous accommodation of his dotlrines to their follies, or their vices. At the fame time he oppofed thofe vices, not with the indifcriminate rage of a blind enthufiafl ; but with the fteady refolution of a wife and upright mind, that mixed zeal with knowledge, and added conviftion to authority. Even by the contcffion of his enemies, * be was trucy and taught the way of God in truths neither cared he for any man : for he regarded not the perfons of men. A condud: like this was utterly inconfiflent with the intricate v/iles of policy, or the afpiring views of ambition. Far from engaging in the purfuit of fecu- lar power and authority, the bleffed Jefus repeatedly, and per^ptorily rejefted them when offered to his hands. He difclaimed the office of a ruler or a judge ; be even fled from the infatuated multitude, v/ho ac- H 4 know! edged * Matt. xxil. i6. liiz S E R M O N v. knowledged him for their king, and would have ex^ alted him to a throne. The impoftor of Arabia feized the fceptre, before it was offered to him ; the didator of Rome reje»^ed a crown, which it was both u.nfafe and diflionourable for him to wear ; and was confcious, that he had al- ready obtained the folid power of monarchy, while he relunftantly, though oitentatioufiy refufed its gau- dy appendages. But far different was the condua of Jefus Chrift. He declined as well the reality of do- minion, v/hich Cgefar poffeffed, as the appearance of it which Mahomet alTamed. He declined them, at a time when, by accepting them, he might have grati- fied the pride of his countrymen, fub hied all the pre- judices which obflructed the belief of his n.iiiion, and averted raany of the dangers which threatened his life. Thofe miftaken views of temporal grandeur, whicli the difciples had indulged, their mailer indullrioufiv correfted : he fought ' on every occafion to humble, their pride, to draw off their attention from the things of this world, and to fix them on thofe above. Men, who fet no value on any interefts but thofe which v/ere connefled with honour, wealth and pleaf- ure, contemned the humility of his appearance ; and derided the plainnefs of his preaching. Their pride difdaincd all affociation with a perfon ignobly born, who purfued no meafurcs to exalt himfelf above the common rank of life. Hence, with an immediate view to that humble appearance which he condefcend- ed to aflume on earth, the prophet Ifaiah thus .beau- tifully delineates his charafter. "^ He Jha/I grow up, as a tender plants and as a root out of a dr-^j ground : be hath no form, nor comcUncfs ; andtvhen ivc jhall fee hin there is no beauty thai ive fljould deftre him. He is def- pifed. and rcjc^kd of:ncn, a man offorrows and acquaint-^ ed * Ifaiah liii. a, 3. S E R M O N V. '^^ ed iji'ith grife ; ar.d -zue hid tis it were our faces from him. He was dcjyifcd, and we ejieemed bi?n not. Even his numerous and ftupendous miracles were not wrought through oflentatlon, or with any view to lerve the purpoils of human glory. On the con- trary, they were ad\s of the purcil and moft' difmter- efted benevolence. They have a kind of ethical ex- cellence, clofe and ftriking conformity to the peculiar temper, as well as the diltinguifhing and important miflion of him, by whom they were performed. He often enjoined the (trideil feerecy to thofe who were fpeftators of thefe mighty works ; led he fliould appear to affeft more than to deferve the high cha- rader he fullained. * Go thy way tell no ?iian, was his frequent command to thole whom he had refcucd from the fharp anguilh of difeafe, the gloomy horrors of blindnefs, or the agonizing diilraftions of demons iac phrenzy. From a fimilar principle arofe his condefcenfion in admitting little children to his arms, in blelling them and recommending them to the prote&ion of his heavenly Father, and to the tender afFeclion of his difciples. From the fame principle, ho vouchfafed to waih his difciples' feet ; and by fo amiable an in- ilancc of humility inculcated this gracious leiTon, tliat no ofnce of benevolent affiflance ihould be thought CGntemptible, or unworthy even the dignity of the mod exalted character, if thereby a friend rnay be relieved in pain, or a fellow creature extricated from diftrefs. Now if his humility had been only affected, in or- der to cover denp^ns of which ambition was the hid- O den motive, there would have been fome ungu.-^.rded moment when the malk would have dropped off. But the whole hfe of our bleffed Lord, in all its viciffitudes, is marked by the fame calm indifference to worldly honours * jMatt.viii. 4. Markviil. 3.6. Luke viii. 56. 124 S E R M O N V. honours, the fame manly diiiegard oF popular ap^ plaufe, the fame exempiion from the impatience of defire when preeminence was offered to him, and from the anguifh of difappointment when it was rc- fufed. As the condud of Chrift was not actuated by am, bition, fo neither was it influenced by any other bufe and inordinate paffion. He did not make his doctrine fubfurvient to the gratification of any darling lulls an.d corrupt affeftions in himfelF, or his difciples : on the contrary, he conftantly enjoined the pradice of the purefl:, the ftrideft, and the mod rcfmed chani- ty ; not only in outward actions, but even in the in- ward imaginations of the heart. He boalted of no cxclufive privileges, nor claimed any invidious ex- ceptions from the laws which he had prefcribed to others. He allowed no licentioufnefs under the pre- tence of religion ; and tranfgrelfed no rules of de- cency or of rectitude, under the arrogated fandion of the Divinity. Though poffefied of the moft unbounded power, we behold him living continually in a (late of volun- tary humiliation and poverty ; we fee him daily ex- posed to almoft every fpecies of vrant and diftrefs ; afflicted without a comforter, perfecuted without a protector, and wandering about, according to his own pathetic complaint, bccaufe he bad not 'u.'hcrc to, lay bis bead. Though regardlefs of the pleafures, and fomctimes deftitute of the comforts pf life, he never provokes our difguft by the fournefs of the mifantlirope ; or our contempt, by the inadivity of the reclufe. He never aifected gloomy aullerity ; nor fought to be fequeftered from the world, in order to preferve the fpirituality of his mind. But his miniftry was pro- fefledly, and really, deftined to aftive employment ; and engaged in promoting the nobleft interefls of mankind. SERMON V. 125 mankind. He therefore freely mixed with them in all the habits of focial intercourfe : and in thofe mo- ments, when all the avenues of the heart are open to gaiety and affection, he filently inftrucled his com- panions in the rare, but exquifite art of being chear- i\\\ without levity, and of uniting folid improvement with harmlefs entertainment. Socrates converted familiarly with the impious and the licentious, for the fake of corrcdling more effectually their errors, and reltraining their vices ; but his reafonings are fometimeS unnecellarily abftruce, fometimes paradox- ical, and very often indecifive : and in his behaviour inftances may be found Vv'here his gaiety degenerates into buffoonery, and his irony into bitter and indecent farcafm. Jefus deigned to affociate with publicans and fmners ; but he always preferved an exaft decorum in word and deed ; and even in his mod familiar conver- fations he fteadily kept in view the momentuous end for which he came into the world. His attention to their welfare was evidenced not only by his falutary injunftions, vvhich breathed the full and genuine fpirit of compaffion and love ; but by his readinefs to embrace every opportunity of re- lieving their diffreffes, and adminiftering to their wants. He wds, therefore, in a literal, as well as a metaphorical fcnfe, * eyes io the blind ; feet was he to the lame ; and the hlejfmgs of them that 'were ready to penfj^ came upon him. In every period and circum- ftance of his hfe, we thus behold dignity and eleva- tion blended with love arid pity : fomething, which, though it av/akens our admiration, yet attrafts our confidence. We fee power ; but It is a power which is rather our fecurlty than cur dread ; a power foft- ened by tendernefs, and foothing, while it awes. And yet with all the gentlenefs of a meek and lowly mind, v/e behold an heroic firmnefs, which no terrors * Job xiix. 15, tj. iii S L R i\r O N V. terros could {l:iake, and no oppofition could reflraiil; This union of oppofite qualities conflitutea, indeed^ the dillinguilhing beauty of his charafter. It pre- fents us, as it were, with the lights and fliades, which mixed in due proportion, contributes to the finifhing of the pidure. Had his actions been governed only by the foft and yielding influences of gentlenefs and compaflion, he never could have completed a work, which called for the moft determined efforts of adive zeal and fortitude. Befides this deficiency in point of pofitive exertion, his conduct, if v/holly guided by the gentler principles of the human heart, would; have fubjefted him to the fufpicion of a blind and irrational impulfe : it vrould have been imputed to a conipiexional felicity of temper, a mere inilinftive benevolence ; which having no moral motive, could be entitled to no praife ; and which, being deftitute of a fteady principle, v/ould prove of little benefit to mankind. The conduft of our blefl'ed Lord was,* therefore, guided by reafon as well as by affection ; and was diftinguiihed as much by an heroic zeal for the truth, and an unrelenting oppofition to the errors and wickednefs of the times, as by the gentler quali- ties of meeknefs, compaflion, and forbearance. That the charafter fuftained by our Lord was not affumedv that he was in reality and truth what he ap- peared to be, is evident from the perfv*ct confiftency of his conduft. In the exemplary uniformity of Cato's behaviour, we fee the caufe of that fplendid panegyric which the hifforian has beflovved on him : * " Effe, qnam vide- ri, bonus malebat." Now, on this vefy principle we affert the fmcerity of Chrifl ; becaufe, in every peri- od of his hiftory we find thr.t he never fwerves from tnoral rectitude, nor fmks below the dignity of his religious character?* In the private fcenes of life, * and * Salluft. Eel!. Catil. S i: R M O N V; jr2^ jmd in the public occupations oi his miniftry ; wheth- er the objecL of adniiialion or of ridicule, of love or of perfecution ; whether welcomed with hofannas, or infulted with anathemas ; we itill fee him purfu- ing With unwearied conilancy the fame end, and pre- serving the fame integrity of life and manners. To exemplify thefe extraordinary qualities and vir- tues in the aftions of that life w hicli they adorned, is a talk from wdiich I retire with awful diifidence. Some of the brightefl characters which poetry has feigned, or hifcory has recorded, become more pleaf- ing and more interefcing to us from the contralt of their weakneiTes and excellencies in different fitua- tions, or from the mixture of both in the fame aclion. But the life of Chi ill has none of tholie inequalities, which it is the de|ight of the orator to paint, and of tjie philofcpher to analyze. The natural and unaf- fected deportment which he invaribly preferved, with- out painful exertion, and without infidious defign ; the confiftence between each particular action and each particular lituation ; the conformity of all his adions to one aommon rule, the word of God ; and their tendency to one common end, the falvation of mankind ; may be explored by the profound moral- ill, muil be admired by the pious believer, but can- not be defcribed, fiirely, without a portion of that matchlsfs fimpliciry, with which they are recorded by the infpired evangvsliil:?. Too plain for ornament, and too grand for illuftration, the character of Jefus leaves .at a diilance the ^^owers of language. Sur- rounded with the meanefl circumftances, and at the .lame time difllnguilhed by the molt important and af- t-oniihing events, it feems to baffle equally by its hu- mility, and its majeHv, all the feeble efforts oi human eloquence. I'hafbirth of our Saviour, placed in the loweft fcene cf poverty, was firft announced to the fliep- herds, ^ izS SERMON V. herds, watching their flocks : but the mefTags was brought by an angel, and a multitude of the heaven- ly hoit. Though he was laid in a manger in defpif- ed Bethlehem, the Ma^i of the Eaft were conduced by a ftar to vifit the humble fpot. Sprung, as he was, from the meaneft origin, and educated in the meaneft occupation ; yet to him was committed the care of immortal fouls, and the falvation of a corrupt and deluded world. His allbciates he had called from the poorefl and moft ignorant of the people ; them, however, did he commiflion to publifh the doclrines of faith ; and on them the Holy Ghofl defcended. Though a friendlefs wanderer, in his own country an exile and an outcaft, he was diffinguifhed whith- erfoever he went, by figns and miracles. Even in his laft hour, when he was nunifbered with malefac- tors on the crofs ; the darknefs which overfpread the land, the rending of rocks, the opening of graves, and all the convulfions, as it were, of fympathizing nature, gave tokens of the Son of God. Confidered then in all its circuniftances, the hifto- ry of Chrift flirinks not from comparifon with the moft partial and lofty reprefentation of the prophet of Arabia. Of both we find, that the earlier part of life, before the publication of their refpedive mifTions, paffed avv'ay in filence, private and undiftinguifhed. The firft years of Mahomet were bufied in the cares of merchandize ; till returning to his native city, he devoted to folitude and retirement the leifure which his opulence had procured. The youth of Jefus was fpent in domeftic privacy^ and was remarkable only for alfedionate and dutiful fubmiffion to his pareiits : unlefs, indeed, when in the temple, he by his ready • anfwers to the queftions of the Rabbins, and his Ikil- fiil expofition of the fcriptures, aftoniflied thdfe that heard him, and gave an omen of his future greatncfs.. Ihe - S E R M O N V. 129 The dcfigns of Mahomet were gradually and cau- tioufly unfolded : and in order to prepare the minds of his countrymen for the reception of his faith, he firfi: artfully peifuaded his own relations and domef- tics, and drew to his fide the mod powerful of his neighbours. Jefus walked forth by the fca of Galilee, and faw fifliers calling their nets. Thcfe were his firft con- verts and difciples. Thotigh they were deftitute of riches and of power, he found in them v/hat his m'n- iftry required, an honefl and a willing fpirit. He won them neither by fubtle arguments, nor crafty perfuafions ; but bade them forfake their nets and follow him,, to fee his humble dwelling, to hear his heavenly difcourfes to the people, and witnefs the wonders he was going to perform. Jefus called his hearers to repentance, but Mahom- et to conqueft. At their firft appearance they were both compelled to avoid the rage of the multitude, Vv'"ho would have deftroyed them : but Mahomet efcaped by a fecret, ignoniinions flight, and Jefus by a public miracle. The revelation of the Arabian prophet was incon- fiftent ; a fyftem. of contradiction, continually Ihifting with the views of his policy, and the neceffities of his impoflure ; now looking towards Mecca, and now to [erufalem. Widelv different was the conduct of Chrift. He did not feek to accommodate his do£l:rine to fortuitous changes in his external circumftances ; he did not at one time revoke what he had aflerted, or contradict what he had enjoined, a:t an other. Eve- ry part of his teaching was regular and confident in. the obje£ts to wiiich it was directed, and the lan- guage in v/hich it was conveyed. Mahomet allured his followers with the glories o a vifible monarchy, and the fplendor of temporal do- minion. In him we behold the lord of war, and the I deftrcvcr :3o SERMON V. deftroyer of mankind, riding in triumph over th(5 fpoils of thoiifands who fell by his defolating fword : laying cities in liames ; carrying mifery and bloodlhed through the earth ; and purfued in his victorious career by the lamentations and curies of its inhabi- tants. In Jefus we fee the adorable prince of peace, the friend and faviour of the world, riding meekly to the holy City, hailed with the acclamations and blefl- ings of much people, whom he had refcued from lin and death, wiping the tears from all eyes, and healing every ficknefs and every difeafe. And here the comparifon mud ceafe. The events that followed in our Saviour's life, are too augull to be placed in competition with any mortal power, and can be comprehended only by minds habituated to the contemplation of heavenly objects. Let us con- fider the paflion of our Lord, and the magnificent fcenes of his refurredion and afcenfion ; an then afl\^ in what part of all the hiftory of Mahometifm any parallel or refemblance can be found ? Let us confid- er the iaft days of Chrill's continuance upon earth, and how does the prophet of Mecca fmk in the com- parifon ? Let us in imagination hear and fee the blelT- ed Jefus, v/hen he gives his Apoftles authorityto go- forth and baptize all nations, and preach in his name repentance and remiffion of fms ; when he empow- ers them to call out evil fpirits, to fpeak with new tongues, and to work wonders : when he holds up to them the promife of the comforter, and power from en high ; and when, having bleifed them,- he afcends into heaven, where he is for ever feated in glory on the right hand of God. 13ut .chiefly, what raifes Chrift and his religion far above' all the fiftions of Mahomet, is that awful alter- native of hopes an ^ fears, that looking for of judg-* mcnt, v/hich our Chriflian faith fcts before us. At SERMON V. 131 At that day, when time the great arbiter of truth and falfehood, fhall bring to pais the accompHfhmcnt cf the ages, and the Son of God fhall make his ene- mies his footftool ; tjhen fhall the deluded followers of the great impoftor, difappointed of the expedted interceffion of their prophet, Hand trembling and difmayed at the approach of the glorified Mefliah. Then fliall they fay, Yonder cometh in the clouds that JefiiSjWhofe religion we labouredtode(lroy,whofe temples we profaned, whofe fervants and followers we cruelly opprefied ! Behold he cometh : but no lon- ger the humble fon of Mary, no longer a mere mor- tal prophet, the equal of Abraham and of Mofes, as'' that deceiver taught us ; but the everlafting Son of the everlafting Father ! The Judge of mankind ! The Sovereign of Angels ! The Lord of all things both in earth and heaven! SERMON SERMON VL I. KINGS. XIIL i8. fiE SAID — I AM A Prophet also — and an Angel spake to ME BY THE WORD OF THE LORD. BuT HE LIED— • - - XN the days of man's innocence, while he \yas yet but little lower than the angels, he converfed with God, without ihame or terror, face to face. But when, by his fatal tranfgreflion, he had fallen from that happinefs in which he was created, he was excluded from this exalted intercourfe ; and the Deity appointed beings of an intermediate rank be- tween himfelf and mai kind, to difpenfe his favours and to reveal his will to his degraded creature. After the tranfgreffion of Adam, he no longer converfed famiharly vv^ith the fons of men. Mofes only was permitted to approach his prefence, to converfe im- mediately with the Moll High, and to behold from the cleft of the rock a fmall portion of the divine glory paffing by. Various were the methods by which the Almighty condefcended to make known his will to his people. Ufually indeed he fpake in dreams and vifions : but the more fotemn manner in which he chofe to in- ftruft mankind, was by employing the miniflration of angels ; who v/ere occafionally lent to deh'ver the divine commands, and to difclofe the hidden events of futurity to the patriarchs and prophets. Of thefe divine meflengers Gabriel alone is exptcfT- ly named in the canonical fcriptures. He was the fa- voured miniller, who v/as commiflioncd to fhew to Daniel ♦ S E R M O N VI. 133 Daniel the reftoration of Jerufalem, the fate of mon- archies, and thofe mighty events that were deRined -to ?nake rcconciliaiion for iniquity^ to bring in cverlajling rigbteoufnefsj and to feat up the vifwn and prophecy. By him the birth of the Baptift was foretold to Ze- charias ; and by him the incarnation of the Mefiiah was announced to the Holy Virgin. A name fo diftinguifhed, the impoflor Mahomet juitly conceived, would be propitious to his defigns r, accordingly he pretended that his own revelations were tranfmitted to him fronj heaven by the minif- tration of the fame angel. To enter into a philofophical inquiry concerning the interpofition of fpirits in the affairs of men, is on the prefent occafion totally unneceflary. The fail; involves no impolTibility ; and till the relation in which this world may ftand to the great fyftem of the univcrfe be fully and diftinclly known, vyho (hall dare to affirm that the aftions of men are unknown or indifl'erent to moral and rational agents, who are endowed with nobler capacities, and employed in a Z. m.ore extenfive fphere ? To metaphyfical fubtleties, which red on gratuitous and arbitrary aiTum.ption, it is fufficient then to op- pofe the general and uniform belief of all ages, whe- ther dark or enlightened, and of all countries, whe- ther barbarous or civilized : but in the pyefent in- quiry we fhall confider the interpofition of angels only in an hiltorical point of view, and fliall difpute the pretentions of Mahom.et on a principle which is equally admitted by the believers both of the Koran and of the Gofpel. i^s the pretended intercourfe of Mahomet with the angel Gabriel reds fokly on the fufpicious authority of his own alTertion, his pretcnfions will not admit pf any ferious attack or any plaufible defence. But N,vhen he afiirms that this divine mefi'enger conr.riuni- 1 3 cate4 134 - 6 E R M O N Vi.% cated to him revelations fo inimitably fublime and, beautiful, that they could not have proceeded from any created being ; when he defies both men and ge- nii to produce any compofition that ihould bear the lead refemblance to his boafted Koran ; when he boldly propofes it to tlie tefl of the fevereft examina- tion, and holds it out to the admiration of the whole world as a tablet infcribed in legible characters by the fingers of the Deity, then we have fome opportu- nity for inquiry and fome foundation for argument. Admitting, what can never be proved, this new hypothefis, that any compofition may be i^o perfect as to tranfcend the powers of man, and rife to our ideas of a miracle ; yet we peremptorily deny the conclu- fion, thus applied from it to the Koran. His infatu- ated followers regarded it as fomething too wonder- ful to be the work of one who profelTed himfelf to be both unlearned and ignorant : and the impollor him- felf declared it fuperior to the utmoil reach of the niojft enlightened and cultivated mind. If to confident alTertions implicit belief were due, we might affent to each of thefe opinions : but if we turn our eyes, firft upon the life of Mahomet (which we have already reviewed) and then on his Koran, which remains to be confidered, we fhall fee no reafon either to glow with the raptures of the Muffelman, or to reecho the boafi:s of the prophet. By the advocates of Mahometifm, the Koran has always been held forth as the greateft of miracles, ?ihd equally ftupendous with the a6t of raifing the dead. The miracles of Mofes and Jefus, they fay, were tranfient and temporary ; but that of the Ko- ran is perjnanent and perpetual ; and therefore far furpafles all the miraculous events of preceding ages. We will not detract from the real merit of the Koran : we allow it to be generally elegant, and often fublime ; but at the fame time we rejett vvith difdain its arro- gant SERMON VI. ^35 gant pretence to any thing fupernatural. As we bc^ fore difcoverd the fuppofed ignorance of the author to be no other than an artful difguife which he af- fumed, to carry on more efieftually his fraudulent defigns ; we Ihiill now as readily be convinced, that all the real excellence of the work is to be referred to natural and vifible caufes. When the Arabs adopted the religion of Mahom- et, all fufpicions of his fmcerity were loft in exulta-i lion at his fuccefs, and admiration of his charader. They did not paufe to examine any abftract queft- ion on the confiilence of his pretended revelations. A bright and prominent example ftood before them, which overw^helmed them v/ith tumultuous amaze- ment and fafcinat-ed them into the moft implicit con- fidence. His triumphs over enemies were confider- ed as the moft brilliant acquifitions to their national glory : and in the dexterity of his contrivance and the vigour of his execution they faw the fublime fea- tures of the hero of their country. His claims to a divine commiflion, attended v/ith an exterior fanclity of demeanour, and fupported by a long and fplendid feries of victories, confirmed them in their veneration for an inftrudor fo eminently favoured, it fliould feem, by the interpofitjon of Heaven itfelf. A confidence thus feemingly dcferved, and thus liberally beftowed would naturally lead the followers of Mahomet, to overlook every imperfection, to en- hance every excellence, to confound the feeming with the real, and to yield to the pretenfions of the prophet the implicit fubmiffion they had already paid to the fuperiority of the v/arrior. Under fuch imprefiions of admiration and afton- ifliment, what could the uninformed Arabian oppofe to the claim of divine infpiration ? Or while fliaring i:n the glory of his arms, how paufe to inveftigate the p-lith of thofe pretenfions, which while they exalteci ' U. hh 136 S E R M O N VL Hi his leader to communion with God, feemed to fhcci a portion of the fame fandity on his followers anci friends. In the language of Arabia alfo, a language extreme- ly loved, and diligently cultivated by the people to whom it \yas vernacular, Mahomet found advantages which were never enjoyed by any former or fucceed- ing impoftor. It requires not the eye of a philofo- pher to difcover in every foil and country a principle of national pride : and if we look back for rnany ages on the hillory of the Arabians, we fliall eafily perceive that pride among them, invariably to have confided in the knowledge and improvement of their native language. The Arabic, which has been jull- ly efteemed the nioft copious of the Ealtern tongues ; which had exiiled from the renioteft antiqpity ; which had been embelliihed by numberlefs poets and refined by the conftant exercife of the natives j was the moft fuccefsful inflrumeut which Mahomet em- ployed in planting his new religion among them. Ad- mirably adapted by its u rivalled harmony, and by its endlefs variety, to add painting to expreffioh, and to purfue the imagination in its unbounded flight ; it became in the hands of Mahomet an irrefiliible charm to blind the judgment, and to captivate the fancy of his followers. Of that defcription of rnen, who firft compofed the adherents of Mahomet, and to whom the Koran was addreffed, few, probably, were able to pafs a very accurate judgment on the propriety of the fentimentSj or on the beauties of the di^^lion : but all could judge of the military abilities of their leader \ and in the Hiidft of their admiration it is not difficult to con- ceive, that they would afcribe to his compofitions every imaginary beauty of infpired language. The Ihepherd and the foldicr, though awake to the charnis of thofe wild but beautiful compofitions,. iu which S E R ]\I O N VL 137 which were celebrated their favourite occupations cf love or war, were yet little able to criticife any other works, than thofe which were addrelled to the im- agination, or the heart. To abflraft rcafonings on the attributes and the difpenfations of the Deity, to the comparative excellencies of rival religions, to the confiftency of any one religious fyfcem in all its parts, and to the jjprce of its various proofs, they were quite inattentive. In fuch a fituation the appearance of a work, which pofleiTed fomething like wdfdom and confidence ; which prefcribed the rules, and ii- luftrated the duties of life ; and which contained the principles of a new, and comparatively fublime the- ology ; independently of its real and permanent mer- it, was likely to excite their aftonifliment, and to be- come the llandard of future compofition. In the firft periods of the literature of every coun- try, fomething of this kind has happened. The fa- ther of Grecian poetry very obvioully influenced the taile and imitation of his countrymen. The modern, nations of Europe all pofTefs fome original author, who rifmg from the darknefs of former ages, has be- gun the career of compofition, and tinclured with the character of his own imagination the dream which has flowed through his poderity. But the prophet of Arabia had in this refpecb ad- vantages peculiar to himfelf. His compofitions were not to his followers the works of man, but the gen- uine language of Heaven which had fent him. They were not coniined therefore to that admiration, which is fo liberally beftowed on the earlicd produdions of genius ; or to that fond attaclun'ent with which men every where regard the original compofitions of their country : but with their admiration they blendid their piety. To know and to feel the beauties of the Koran, v/as in fome refped to diare in the temper of Heaven ; and he who was mod aflcded with ad- miration 13.8 S E R M O N VI. miration in the perufal of its beauties, feemed jnoit jFitly the objeft of that mercy, v/hich had given it to ignorant man. The Koran, therefore, became natu- rally and neceffarily the liandard of tafte. With a language thus hallowed in their imaginations, they were too well fatisfied, either to difpute its elegance, or improve its ftructure. Ki fucceeding ages the ad- ditional fandion of antiquity, or prefcrjptian, was giv- en to thofe compofitions which theif fathers had ad- mired : and while the belief of its divine original .continues, that admiration which has thus become the tcil and the duty of the faithful, can neither be filtered nor diminifhed. ^Vhen therefore we confider thefe peculiar ad van-' tagep of the Koran, we have no reafou to be furprifed at the admiration in which it is held. But, it de,- fcendiiig to ^ more minute invefligation cf it, we confider its perpetual inconfiftence aod abfurdity, we ihall indeed have caufe for aftonifhnient at that weak- nefs of humanity ,~ which could ever have received fuch compofitions as the work of the Deity, The firflpraife of all the productions of genius, is invention ; that quality of the mind, which by the extent and quicknefs of its views, is capable of the largeft conceptions, and of formmg new combina- tions of objects the molt diftant and unufual. But the Koran bears little imprclTion of this tranfcendent character. Its materials are wholly borrowed from the Jewilli and Chriflian fcriptures, from the Talmu- dical legends and apocryphal gofpels then current in the Eaft, and from the traditions and fables which abounded in Arabia. The materials collefted from thefe feveral foiarces, are here heaped together, with perpetual and needlefs repetitions, v/ithout any fettled principle or vifible connexion. When a great part of the life of Mahomet had been fpent in preparatory meditation on the fyfteni he ■ SERMON VI. 35 ne was about to cfliablifli, its chapters were dealt out ilowly and feparately during the long period of three and twenty years. Yet thus defective in its ftructure and not lei's exceptionable in its doctrines, was the >vork which Mahomet delivered to his followers as the oracles of God. The moil prominent feature of the Koran, that point of excellence in which the partiality of its ad- mirers has ever delighted to view it, is the fublime notion it generally impreifes of the nature and attri- butes of God. If its author had really derived thefe juft conceptions frorn the infpiration of that Being whom they attempt to defcribc, they would not have been furrounded, as they now are on every fide, with error and abfurdity. But it might eafily be proved, that whatever it judly defines of the divine attributes, was borrowed from our holy fcripture ; which even from its firft prom^ilgation, but erpecially from the completion of the New Tedament, has extended the views, and enlightend the underdandings of man- kind ; and thus- furnifhed them Vv'ith arms, which have too often been ineffectually turned againll itfelf by its ungenerous enemies. In this inftance paniculiarly, the copy is far belov/ the great original, both in the propriety of its images, and the force of its defcriptions. Our holy fcriptures are the only compofitions that can enable the dim fight of mortality to penetrate into the invifible v/orld, and to behold a ghmpfe of the divine perfedlions. Accordingly, when ttiey would reprefent to us the happinefs of heaven, they defcribe it, not by any thing minute and particular, but by fomething gene- ral and great ; fomething, that v/ithout defcending to any determinate objed, may at once by its beauty and immenfity, excite our wifhes and elevate our affedions. Though in the prophetical and evangeli- cal writings the joys that fliall attend us in a future il?/e J40 SERMON VI. flate are often mentioned \vith ardent admiratlonj they are expn^fled rather by allufion than fimilitiide, rather by indihnite and fi^^urative terms, than by any thdng fixed and determinate, * Eye hath not Jec?j, nor ear hccrd^ neither have entered into the heart of 7nan, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. What a reverence and aftonilhment does this paflage excite in every hearer of tade and piety I What energy, and at the fame time what fnnplicity in the exprc'Iion ? How fubhiiie, 2.nd at the fame time, how cbfcure is the imagery ? Different was the conduct of Mahomet in his de- fcriptiqns of heayen and of paradife. Unalliiled by the neceflary jniluence of virtuous intentions and di- vine infpiration, he was neither defirous, nor indeed able to exalt the minds of men to fubhme conceptions, or to rational expeftations. By atterjipting to ex- plain v/hat is inconceivable, to defcribe what is inef- fable, and to materialize what in itfelf is fpiritual ; he abfurdly and impioufly aimed to fenfuahze the pu- rity of the divine eifence. Thus he fabricated a fyf- tem of incoherence, a religion of depravity, totally repugnant indeed to the nature of that Being, who, as he pretended, was its objeft ; but therefore more likely to accord with the appetites and conceptions of a corrupt and fenfual age. That I may not appear to exalt our Scriptures thus far above the Koran by an unreafonable preference, I fhall produce a part of the fecond chapter of the lat-' ter, which is defervedly admired by the Mahometans, v/ho wear it engraved on their ornaments, and recite it in their prayers. f " God ! there is no God but he ; the living, the felf-fubfifling : neither flumber nor fleep feizeth him : to him belongeth Vvhatfoever is in heaven, and on earth. Who is he that can intercede with him but through - • I Cor. ii. 0. ^ f Salt's Kor. ii. p. 30. 410. edit. SERMON VI. i4i through his good pleafure ; He knoweth that whicii is paft, and that which is to come. His throne is ex- tended over heaven and earth, and the prefervation. of both is to him no burden. He is the high, the mighty.'' To thl's defcripfion v/ho can refufe the praifo of magnihcence ? Part of that magnificence however is to be referred to that verfe of the Pfalmift, whence it was borrowed, * He thai keepcth Jfrael, p:>all neither Jlumher^ norjlcep. . But if we compare it with that other pallage of thei lafne infpired Piahnift, all its boalted grandeur is at once oblcured, and loll in the blaze of a greater light. f /??K Gad^ take me not awa\> in the midjl cf m-j days ; thj ysars a,re throughout all generations. Of old hajl thou laid the foundations of the earth ; and the heavens are the ivork of thy hands. They foall perijJj, but thou fualt endure ; yea all cf them foail ivax old, as doth a garment ; as a vejiure flyalt thou chcmge thevi, and they, (hall be changed ; but thou art the fame, and thy years Cball not fail. The Koran, therefore, upon a retrofpe£live view of thefe feveral circumftances, far from fupporting its arrogant claim to a fupernatural work, fmks be- low the level of manv compofitions coniefledly of human original ; and Hill lower does it fall in ouf edimation, when compared with that pure and per- it&. pattern which we juflly admire, in the Scriptures of truth. It being then abundantly apparent, that no mira- cle either was externally performed for the fuppcrt, or is internally involved in the compofition of the Mahometan revelation, we proceed to inquire, whe- ther . it be better attefted by prophecy, that other grand e'vidence of a mifTion from Heaven ? The ♦ ?i*l. cxxl. 4. f Pi'Ul. cii. 24, 25, 26, 27, J 44 S E R M O fsT Vt: The knowledge of futurity is one of the mofcune'S quivocal and incommunicable charadters of the mofl; High. By this he ftamps a feal on the genuine iilap- fes-of his fpirit; ahd diftinguifhes them from the vif- ions of cnthufiafni and the fables of impofture. Ot this Mahomet was cbrtfcious, and endeavoured to avail himfelf. Senfible of the credibility that arifes from the evidence of prophecy, he appealed to pro- phecy for the authenticity of his miflion. • There were no popular prophetic traditions among the Arabians, that might be wrefted to favour his pretenfions. - The Jewiih and Chriftian fcriptures, therefore^ whicli he acknowledged as divine, were the only fources whence he could attempt to derive any predictions of his coming. • • Though the later advocates of the Mahometan ctiiife hare laboured to difcover fuch predictions in our Bible in its prefent form, we know that it con- tains nothing to countenance their attempt. So v/sak a claim the great pretender himfelf forebore to alledge ; and more artfully refted his pretenfions on a falfehood, which, though flill more abfurd aud improbable, is, by its very abfurdity, more difficult to be difproved. He frequently a:nd boldly affirmed, that his miflion had been foretold by the prophets in the Hebrev/ Teftament, and more particularly by Chriil in the Gofpei : and that both Jews and Chrif- tians, expecting his coming, and dreading his fuccefs, bad concurred in the atrocious crime of mutilating their fcriptures ; and, to deprive him of the teftimo- ny thofe prophecies afforded, had expunged them from the facred pages. But, the idea of this pretended corruption of the facred writings, draws after it a train of the mofl improbable conclulions. That the moft dilcordant feces had united in deilroying an article of ther own- faith, for the unaccountable purpofe of difcrediting a perfcn . S E R M a N Vl. i],j ptrffon to be born in a future age ; and that their at- tempt fuccceded in thus mutilating a book difperfed through every country in every language, is among the confequences of this extraordinary hypothefis. But we have the ftrongeft reafons to believe, that our holy fcriptures, by the care of a good providence, have defcended to us pure and perfect, from their original times. There is indeed no evidence of the authenticity of any compofitions, but what equally attends the books of the Old and New Teiiament. Nay, there are no ancient v/ritings which bear fuch peculiar arid dif- criminating charadteriflics of authenticity. Their importance made them fubjcds of deep attention and confideration ; and their authority occafioned them to be appealed to by chrifcians of every perfuarion. Different fedts watched over them with a jealous eye, lelt they fhould be corrupted ; and as each made them a ifandard, each contributed to preferve their identity. To confirm us flill further in this opinion, we have the concurring teilimony of many ancient writers, oi^ the primitive fathers of the church, and of here- tics who maintained the mod clafting and oppofite tenets ; whofe fcriptural quotations, though made v/ith different views from different copies, all uniform- ly refer to one and the fame Bible. The very excep- tions to this general pofition are few, and contribute additional proofs in favour of the facred text : for every mutiJation, however inconfiderable, every de- pravation, however artful, to which the rage of con- troverfy had given birth, were inilantly deteded by the adivity, and expofed by the indignation of the oppofite party. There are extant at this day various manufcripts of both Teftaments, much older than the Hejra. Such are the Vatican and Alexandrian manufcripts j- the 144 SERMON VI. the dates of which are generally afcribed by the crit-* JGS to the fourth, or fifth,' century. Ifi thcfe wc no where find any mention of Mahomet, or any other iil- iiifions to his cominjr, than the general predidion that falfe Chrifts and falje Prophets JJjoidd arife. But to enter at. large into this liibjefl: is neither confident with my planj nor indeed neceflary to my argument ; fmce a flight confideration of thefe obvi-, ous proofs will afford the clearcfl conviction, that thofe imaginary prophecies ^thich Mahomet alledged^ if they had ever exiiled in the facred volume, would have exifled flill ; and in truth, that no fuch corrup- tion as he pretended, has ever happened to our fcrip- tures. Thus was a man of no common talents, reduced by the very nature of his enterprife to bear record of himfelf, to fupport his own caufe by his own un- fiipported tellimony, and to maintain a weak and de< fencelefs claim by a futile and abfurd appeal to pro- phecies which had no exidence. It appears then, that the pretenfions of Mahomet are not accompanied by any of thofe marks of exter- nal evidence, which may always be expected to con- firm and to diftinguiih a divine revelation. The proofs which he adduced in fupport of his claims are, in every point of view, weak, and unfatf-faclory. To miraculous power, that mod infallible and decifive tell of divine interpofition, he openly difclaimed ev- ery pretence ; and even boldly denied its neceffity to confirm the miifion of a prophet. He deemed it ilifficient to appeal toi a fecret and unatteded inter- courfe with an angel ; and above all, to the inimita- ble exceilence and fubiimity of the Koran. To the former of thefe pretences no ferious attention is due : for, indead of affording any evidence in fupport ot the claims of Mahomet, it notorioufly wants proofs- to edablilh its own authenticity. With regard to the beaded SERMON VI. 145 boafted excellence of the Koran, which, as the im- poltor alledged, bore ftrong and vifible characters of an almighty hand, and was defigned by God to com- penfate the v/ant of miraculous power, and to fupply every defect of external evidence, we have already Teen how ill founded are its haughty and arrogant pretenfions to a divine original. From a view of the real merits of that celebrated work, and from a confideration of the peculiar cir- cumftances under which it was written and delivered to the world ; from its want of invention, of order, of confiilency ; from the real character and abilities of its author J and from the fignal advantages which he enjoyed in a language copious and exprellive, harmo- nious and refined ; in the years which were fpent. in previous meditation, and the ftill longer fpace which was afterwards employed m its.compofition ; and above all, in the opinions, the habits, and the preju- dices of his countrymen 5 I fay, from a due confidera- tion of thefe important particulars, we are fully jufti- ned in refolving all its merit and all its fuccefs, into the agency of ordinary and human caufes. But the evidence which Mahomet alledged in fup- port of the character he had affumed, was not only in itfclf fallacious and equivocal ; we may alfo trace plain marks of impolture in the manner in which that evi- dence was propofed and enforced. Senfible of the weaknefs of his credentials, and of the fufpicion to v/hich the proofs he had adduced were juftly liable, he anxioufly laboured to miflead the unwary, and to confound the ignorant by the arrogance of his claims, and the confidence of his affertions. Thus, inftead of delivering his pretended revela- tion to his followers, and leaving it to (land or fall by the determination of their own cool and difpaf- fionate judgment, he endeavoured to anticipate their opinions, employed every artifice to enhance its mcr- K ' it. 146 S E R M O N VI. it, and cnibrciceJ every opportunity to exaggerate iH excellence by the molt pompous and elaborate enco- miums on its perfection. Hence arofe his bold and haughty defiance of the united powers of every order of created beings, to produce a work of equal beauty and fiiblimity with the miraculous Koran ; hence too proceeded hh groundlefs, yet oftentatious appeal to the teftimony of the ancient prophets ; from whofe writings he wa!: confeffedly unable to produce a fmgle prcdiftioni which could, with any probability of conffruftion, be wrefted to favour his pretenfions. Compelled by the nature of his fitdation and de- fign, to fupport one impious falfehood by another {till more atrocious, the artifice and the audacity of the impoftor carried him yet farther ; and, in order to afford Ibme countenance to his extravagant appeal to the evidence of prophecy, induced him to charge both Jews and Chriftians with the odious, but impoffible crime of corrupting their fcriptures. Such were the vain pretences, and fuch the unfub- ftantiai proofs by which the prophet of Arabia labour- ed to confirm and to authenticate his mifiion. But far different was the conduct, and different the evi- dence, vv'hich was adduced by Jefus Chrift, in fupport of his claim to the charafter and office of the Mefliahv Into this contraft, however, the time wiH not at pre^ fent permit me to enter. The confideration of that long and aftonifliing train of Miracles, and of that equally ftupendous chain of prophecies, on whofe colleftive evidence, as on a firm and immoveable ba- fis, our holy religion tiltlmately refts would unavoid>- ably lead me into too wide a field of inveftigation. The infinite iniportance of the fubje^l:s naturally demands Our mod ferious and earned attention, and io, I truil, fufficient fully to juftify me in reserving themasobjedsof fulur, aidmcre particular difcuffior?.^ SERMON , SERMON VII. JOHN X. 25. JESUS AS'SWERED THE WORKS THAT I DO IN MY FATHER'S NAME, THEY BEAR WITNESS OF ME. H .AVING in my laft difcourfe endeavour- ed to expofe that empty ihew of external evidence, by which the Arabian impoftor laboured to fupport his impious pretenfions, I now proceed, in purfuance of my general plan, to examine and ftate the proofs on which Jefus Chrifl: relied his claim to the charac- ter of a divine teacher. In the words which 1 have now read to you, our Lord replies to the captious queftions of the Jews concerning his dignity and of- fice ; and refers them to the Miracles which he wrought as affording plain and undeniable evidence of his milTion. Every one knows, what Is meant by a Miracle ; though divines have differed about the preclTe terms of definition. Some have defined it in language too loofe and equivocal ; and have thus confounded that which is unaccountable with that which Is miracu- lous : others, to avoid this extreme, have fo narrowed the definition as to make it Inapplicable even to events which are truly entitled to that denomination. 1 vviil not attempt to give fuch a definition as fhall be exad: without being defedive ; and comprehenfive without being redundant. It is fuificient to fay, that by a Mi- racle I mean, " An event out of the ordinary and fettled courfe of nature, and fuch as could not have been produced either by the operation of its general K 2 laws 148 SERMON Vir. laws, or the combination of contingent circum- fiances :'* Or — " An operation performed by any- particular agent, which tranfcends his fkill and pow- er, and which required the aflidance of a fupernatur- al being/' * A celebrated champion of infidelity, has infidi- oufly or erroneoufly maintained a Miracle fo be con- trary to experience •, whereas it is in reality only dif- ferent from it. Experience informs us, that one event has happened often — teftimony informs us that another extent has happened once, or more. That dif- eafes fhould be generally cured by the application of external caufes, and fometimes at the mere word of a prophet, and without the vifible application of caufes, are fads not inconfifl'ent with each other in the na- ture of things th^mfelves, or irreconcileable accord- ing to our ideas. Each fad: may arife from its own proper caufe ; each may exifl independently of the Other ; and each is known by its own proper proof, be it of fenfe or teftimony. As fecret caufes often produce events contrary to thofe we do expert froni experience, it is equally conceivable that events fhould fometim.es be produced which we do not ezi- ped:. To pronounce therefore a Miracle to be falfe, be- caufe it is different from experience, is only to con- clude againft its general exiflence from the very cir- cumftance which conflitutes its particular nature : for if it were not different from experience, where would be its fmgularity ? Or what particular proof could be drawn from it, if it happened according to the ordinary train of human events, or was includ- ed ill the operation of the general laws of nature.^ We grant that it does differ frpm experience : but we do no prefume to make our experience the flan- dard of the divine condud. He that acknowledges a God * Mr. HumCt •S' E R M O N Vir. 1 49 a God, mufl at leafl: admit the pofTibility of a Miracle. The Atheift that makes him infeparable from what is called nature, and binds him to its laws by an inlur- mountable neceflity ; that deprives him of will, and wifdom, and power, as a diftindt and independent Be- ing, may deny even the very poffibility of a miracu- lous interpofition, which can in any inftance fufpend or countera^: thofe general laws by which the world is governed. But he who allows of a firll caufe in it- ielf perfect a»d intelligent, abftraftedly from thofe ef- fects which his wifdom and power have produced, piuft at the fame t jme allow, that this caufe can be under no fuch reft|-aints as to be debarred the liberty of con- troling its laws as often as it fees fit. Surely the Being that made the world, can govern it, or any part of it, in fuch a manner as he pleafes : and he that conftitut- ed the very laws by which it is in general conducted, may fufpend the operation of thofe laws in any given inftance ; or imprefs new powers on matter, in order to produce new and extraordinary eife^s. Here indeed it is proper for me to obferve, that the force exerted in every Miracle is finite, and may, in many cafes, be in itfelf far lefs than what we fee employed in the ordinary courfe of the world. The fudden fufpenfion of the force, which preferves any one planet in its orbit, is lefs than th e conftant exercife of that force, which preferves all the planets in their refpeclive orbits ; and yet if may be properly miraculous. It is not therefore nee- effary -to fay, that Miracles cannot be performed by a power lefs than infinite. That no beings can change, or counterad, or fuperfede the order of things, as ef- tablilhed by the Deity, without his appointment, is indeed the clear and neceifary confequence of his omnipotence ; but that he may appoint them to change it, involves no contradiction : that purpofes of the higheft moment may be anfv/ered by fuch ap« pointment, implies no abfurdity ; and therefore, in K 3 the ISO SERMON Vll. the cafe of Miracles, whether the Deity performs them immediately by himfelf, or mediately by other agents, the great ends of religion are equally fecur.ed," and the proofs of his interpofition may be equally luminous. Miracles may be claiTcd under two heads : thofe which confift in a train or cojnb'Diation of events, which could not have refulted from the ordinary arrange- ments of Providence ; and thofe particular cperatiofis which are performed by inflruments and agents in- competent to effect them without a preternatural power. In the conduft of Providence refpefting the Jewiili people, from the earlieft periods of their exiftence, as a diilinft clafs of fociety, to the prefent time, we be- hold a fingularity of circumilance and procedure, which we cannot account for on common principles.. Comparing their condition and fituation with that of other nations, we can meet with nothing fmiilar to it in the hiftoyy of mankind. So remarkable a differ- ence, confpic\ious in every revolution of their hiftorv, could not have fubfilted through mere accident. There muft have been a caufe adequate to fo extraor- dinary an effeft. • Now, what fhould this caufe be, but an interpofition of Providence in a manner dif- ferent from the courfe of its general government ;— r- for the phenomenon cannot be explained by any ap- plication of thofe general caufes and effeds that ope- rate in other cafes. ■ . • The griginal propagation of Chriftianity was like- wife an event, which clearly difcovered a miraculous interpofition. The circumftances which attended it were fuch, as cannot rationally be accounted for on any other poftulatum. I have already confidered this fubjeft at large. I would now obfervc, that the inftitutions of the Law and the Gofpel may not only appeal for their confirmation to a train (f events, which, taken in a general and combined vievi^, point out SERMON VII. 151 Qixt an extraordinary defignatlon, and vindicate their claim to a divine authority ; but alio to a number of particular operations, which, cdnfidered difiinftly, or in a feparate and detached light, evidently difplay a fupernalural power, immediately exerted on the oc- cafion. Since Chrifl: himfelf conflantly appealed to thefe works as the evidences of his divine miflion and char- rafter, we will briefly examine, how far they jullified and confirmed his pretenfions. That our Lord laid the greatefl: ftrefs on the evir dence they afforded ; nay, that he confidered that evidence as fuflicient to authenticate his claims to the office of the Mclliah with all reafonable and well dif- pofed inquirers, is manifcft not only from the words of my text, but alfo from a great variety of other paf- fages in the ILvangeHfts. Thus, when the difciples of John were fent to Chrifl to receive from his own lips the moft fatisfaclory proofs of his divine mifhon, he referred them to his Miracles. * Go, faid he, andjljew to John again thofc things which ye hear and fee : the blind receive their fight, the lame walk, the lepers are clcanfed, the dccf hear, and the dead are raifed up. Again, \ Jf I do not the works of my Father, believe me not : but if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works. This appeal to Miracles was founded on the follow- ing juft and obvious grounds. First, that they are vifible proofs of divine appro- bation, as well as of divine power ; for it would have been incon^lufivje to have refted an appeal on the tei- timony of the latter, if it had not at the fame time included an evidence of the former : and it was in- deed a natural inference, that working of Miracles in defence of a particular caufe, was the feal of Heaven {o the truth of th?.t caufe. To fuppofc the contrar v^ "K 4 would Mat, li. 4. I^Jchnx. aj. 152 SERMON VU. wcJuld be to fuppofe, that God not only permitted his creatures to be deceived ; but that he deviated from the ordinary courfe of his providence, purpofely with a view to deceive them. The conclufion which the man, whom our Saviour reftored to fight, drew from this Miracle, was exceedingly jufl, and founded on the common fentiments and impreffions of the hu- man heart. * We know, fays he, t/jat God hcarctb not Jinners : but if any man be a ivorjhipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world began was it not heard, that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this ?nan were not of God, he could do nothing. If the caufe which our Lord was en- gaged in, had not been approved of by God, it would not been honoured with the feal of Miracles : for the divine power can never be fuppofed to coun- teraft the divine wlil. This would be to fet his na- ture at variance with itfelf ; and by deftroying his fimplicity, would deflroy his happinefs, and terminate in confufion and mifery. Hence we may jullly rejefl; as Incredible thofe Mi- racles, which have been afcribed to the interpofition of wicked fpirits. The poffibility of their interference is a mere hypothefis, depending upon gratuitous af- fumptron, and leading to veiry dangerous confe- quences : and the particular instances in which cred- ulous fuperflition, or perverted philofophy, has fup- pofed them to interfere, are, as Fadls, deflitute of any clear and folid evidence, or as Effects, often re- folvable into natural caufes. Secondly, when our Lord appealed to his Mira- cles as proofs of his divine milTion, it prefuppofed that thofe Miracles were of fuch a nature as would bear the flriftefl examination ; that they had all thofe criteria, which could pofTibly diflinguifh them from the delufions of enthufiafm, and the artifices of im- polKire J "John ix. 31, 32. ^^^ # # ^ l^ pofture ; elfe the appeal would have and equivocal. He appealed to them with all the*' upright mind, "totally poflefled with a c( their truth and reality. This appeal out into any laboured argument ; nor adors^d by^i of the embellilhments of language. It" Ws^, Ihprt, p fmiple, and decifive. He neither reafoned. ilo,r der^' claimed on their nature, or their defign. IJig Cyarely. pointed to them as plain and indubitable fa6is, fuch' . as fpoke their own meaning, and carriM with ihera their own authority. The Miracles which our Lord performed, were too public to be fufpe»5ted of impoftuj-e '; and being.ob- je£ls of fenfe, they were fecured againft the char^ of enthufiafm. An impoflor would not l^rve acled* fo abfurdly, as to have refqued his credit on the per-> - formance of what he mud have known it was not in his power to effedl. And though an enthufiaft, from the warmth of imagination, might have flattened him- felf with a full perfuafion of iiis being able to perform fome miraculous work ; yet when the trial tVas re- ferred to an objeft of fenfe, the event muft foon have expofed the delulion. The impofiior would not have dared to fay to the blind. Receive thy ftght^ to the . deaf. Hear, to the dumb. Speak, to the dead, Arife, to the raging of the fea,- Beji'dl ; left he fliould injure, the credit of his caufe, by imdertaking more than h^ could perform. And though the enthufiaft, under the delufion of his pailions might have confidently commanded difeafe to fly, and the powers of nature to be fubjeci; to his control ; yet their obedience would not have followed his command. The Miracles of Chrift then were fuch as an impof- tor would not have attempted ; and fuch as an en- thufiaft could not have eftefted. They had no dif- guife J and were in a variety of inftances of fuch a nature, ■% }54 SERMON VII. ijature, as to preclude the very poflibility of collufion. They were performed in the midft of his bittereil ene- mies, ; '^nd were fo palpable and cer).ain as to extort the following aQknowledgement even from perfons who were rr^ofl eager to oppofe his dodrines, and to difcredit his pretenfions : * T/jis ?nan doeth mi^ny Mi- racles. Ifivc let him thus alone ^ all 7nen will believe on The Miracles Chrift performed, were indeed fuf- ficient to alarm the fears of thofe whofe downfal was involved in his fuccefs. And it was impoilible for them to deny the fads, which fo many thoufands were ready to atteil on evidence too certain to admit even the poflibility of miftake, delufion, or impof- ture. But his enemies, who admitted their reality and yet refifted their defign, by not acknowledging the perfon who wrought them to be the Melliah, Iiad recourfe to the mod impious and mod abfurd fuppo- fitions, in order to evade their evidence. The hea- then imputed them to fome occult power of magic ; and thus applied vv^hat h^s no exiftence in nature, in order to account for a phenomenon t^at exifted out of its common cqurf^. The (lories of the Jev/s, who confelTed the Miracles, but denied what they were in- tended to eltablilli, are two ridiculous to be mention- ed. I mufl not, however, omit to take notice of the, wicked and biafphemous cavil pf the Pharifees, and the noble reply which our Lord made to it. They conld not deny the faft, but they imputed it to the. agency of an infernal fpirit. f This fellow ^faid they^ doth not caji out devils but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils. A?id Jcfiis knew tlmr thoughts and /aid nnto them^ Every kingdom divided againjl itfelf i^ brought to defolation ; and every city or houfe divided againjl itfelf]ha!l not Jl and : and if Satan cajl out Satan^ be is divided againjl himfelf ; how foall then his kingdo?;^ Jland? The * John xi. 47, 48. t Matt. xii. 24. 3 E R M O N Vil. 155 The purity of the doftrine which was taught by our blefled Lord, was totally adverfe to the kingdom ofdarknefs. It tended to overthrow it, bytheintro- dudion of principles far different from thofe M'hich Satan would infpire ; and by profecuting objeds total- ly oppofite to thofe which that wicked and malignant fpirit would tempt us to purfue : iO that in propor^ tion to the prevalence of the kingdom of Chrift, the kingdom of Satan would of courfe be diminiflicd. Now, fuppofmg Miracles to be in the poAver of an infer- nal fpirit, can it be imagined that he would commu- nicate an ability of performing them to perfons, who were counterading his defigns ? Would he by ihenx give credit to a caufc, that tended to bring his own into difgrace ? Thus, as our Saviour appealed to Miracles as proofs of hi's power ; fo he appealed to the inherent worth and purity of the doftrines they were intended to bear witnefs to, as a proof that the power was of God. In this manner do the external and internal evidences give and receive mutual confirmation, ancj mutual luftre. ■ The trutk of the Chriftian religion does not, how- ever, wholly depend on the Miracles wrought by its divine founder, though fufficient in themfelves to ef- tablifh his claims : but in order to give the evidence of Miracles the ftrongefi: force they could pollibly ac- quire, that evidence was extended flill farther ; and the fame power that our Lord pofleifed, was commu- nicated to his difciples, and their more immediate iiiccelfors. Vv^hiKl yet on earth, he imparted to them this extraordinary gift, as the feal of their commif- fion, when he fent them to preach the gofpel : and after his glorious rcfurredion and afcenfion into heav- en, they were endowed with powers yet more ftu- pendous. Senfible of the validity of this kind of evidence, the apollles of our Lord, with the fame art- ■ le[s i'5$ SERMON VII. lefs fimpHcIty, and the fame boldnefs of confcious integfity, which diftinguifhed their great mafter, co'n- ftantly infilled upon the Miracles they wrought^ as ftrong and^undeniable proofs of the truth of their dodrines. Thus the Miracles of our blefled Lord may be juftly confidered as the evidence of his divine miffion and character. If we confider their nature, their greatnefs, and their number ; and if to this confideration we add that which refpedts their end and defign, we mufl acr knowledge, that no one could have performed them^ unlefs God was with him. They were too public to be the artifices of impofture ; too fubltantial and too numerous, to afford the flightefl: fufpicion of un- defigned and fortuitous coincidence. In a word, fup- pofmg that the divine Being fhould in any inftance fo far counteraQ; the common laws of nature, as to produce a Miracle ; and fhould defign that Miracle as a monument to futtire times, of the truth of any particular doftrine, we cannot conceive any mode of communicating it more effeftual than that which hn has chofen. Stronger proofs could not be afforded, confiftently with the defign of the Gofpel, which is not to overpower our underflantiings by an irrefifti-' ble and compulfory light, but to afford us fuch ra- tional evidence as is fufficient to fatisfy moral inquir- ers, who are endowed with faculties to perceive the truth ; bqt at the fame time who alfo have power to- tally to refift it, and finally to forfeit all its bleffings.' It v/ould lead me too far to purfue the fubjed of Miracles in detail. What I have to urge, may be, however, comprized under the following heads. Thefe Miracles were of a nature too palpable to be miftaken. They were the objects of fenfe ; and not the precarious fpeculations of reafon concerning what God might do ; or the chimerical fuggeftions of an- cy concerning what he did. The fads were record- ed - S E R M O :N Vll. 15^ ji,. ■ "'% cd by thofe who mud know whether they were true '' br fahe. The pcrlbns who recorded them, were uni der no poffible temptations todeceive the world. ; We <:an only account for their conduct on the fuppofition of their nioft perfeft convidion, and difmterefted zeal. That they Ihould aflert what they luiew to be falfe ; that they fliould publifn it with fo much ar- dour ; that they ftiould refque every thing dear td humanity, in order to maintain it ; and at lafl fub- mit to death, in order to attelt their perfuafion of its truth in thofe moments when impodure ufualiy drops its maft:, and enthufiafm loffes its confidence ; that they fhould act thus' in oppofition to every dictate of common fenfe, and every principle of common hon- cfly, every reftraint of ihame, and every impulfe of felfifnnefs ; is a phenomenon not lefs irreconcileable to the moral ftate of things than Miracles are to the natural conflitution of the world. Falfehood natural- ly entangles men in contradidtion, and confounds them with difmay : but the love of truth invigorates the mind ; the confcioufnefs of integrity anticipates the approbation of God ; and confcience creates a fortitude, to which niere unfupported nature is often, a ftranger."* The divine miflion of oiir blefied Lord was not on- ly fupported by a variety of Miracles which carried with them every mark of a fupernatural power, and were immediate and vifible evidences of the concur- rence of the great ruler of nature in that caufe which they were brought to defend ; but it was illuftrated and confirmed by a train of Prophecies, which be- ginning with the fall, opened with greater luftre and with a wider profpeO:, as the fulneis of time drew near, in which they were to receive their accomplifh- the earth by Jefus Chrift, who according to the ilefh. fprang from his loins ; and fulfilled the promife made unto the father, that in Ifaac Jloould hh feed be called. We firft fee the promife of G^d to this ancient Pa- triarch fulfilled by giving him a fon, contrary to all human expedtations. The next grand flep of its ac- complifhment was in the twelve Patriarchs. We fee them through the amazing, and to human view, in- comprehenfible dire£l:ion gf divine Providence, fettled in Egypt : and through the influence of Jofeph, who miraculoufly became a perfon of diftinguifhed credit, and confequence in the court of Pharaoh, treated tvith peeuHar refpe\>, iiiv. 24. SERMON VIL 163 the grand and myfterious fcheme of man's redemp- tion ; and here he at length accompliflied them in that great event, which included the refult of all. The important purpofe for which the Jews i?i general had been thus miraculoufly feparated from the reft of mankind, was evidently to prepare the way for the coming of the Mefiiah, by preferring and tranfmitting the worfhip, the promifes, and the predictions of the Almighty to future generations. The particular fep- aration of one tribe from the great body of the Jew- ifh nation, was plainly an aft of the fame divine pow- er, and became in a manner equally ilriking, fubferv- ient to the accompiiibment of the fame great defign. As he who was to blefs all the families of the earth, was to fpring from the feed of Abraham, fo it was foretold that he Ihould arife out of the tribe of Judah, which was a particular branch of that general ilock. For the fake of preferring a recorded lineage in uninterrupted fucceilion, this tribe was kept diftindt amidft every revolution of the Jewifh nation : and amidft the depreffions and changes of its various Aates, as it had been foretold by Jacob, Judah main- tained within itfelf a peculiar prerogative and dignity, till the great end which was to be efFefted by its fepa- ration from the other tribes of Ifrael, as well as from, the world in general, was accompliflied. The pro- phecy limited the period M-hen thi'* end would be fully anfwered ; even when Shiloh, W the Meffiah, fliould come : and then its authority fliould ceafe, and the very enfigns and badges of its former digni- ty and pre-eminence fhould be no more ; thefceptre fnould depart from Judah ; a:jd its law-giver Iliould lofe all authority to ena^t laws, and ail power to en- force them.* The fcene of prophecy opened with a clearer and more majeltic view to David and the Prophets. Da- L 2 vid •Gen. xiix. 10. 1 64 SERMON VIl vid foretold the change of the order of the priellhood by the Mclliah ; the office he fliould himl'elf fuftain ; the fufFerings he fliould undergo ; and the glorious triumphs he Ihould enjoy from his refurr^iction, his af- cenfion, and the extenfive propagation of his gofpel.*' In procefs of time it difclofcu fecrets Itill more in- fcrutable to human penetration ; and unfolded, to the aftoniihed eye, events and circumllances that were beyond the power of imagination to conceive, or of expectation to anticipate : events of which pref- ent appearances gave no intimation ; and circumftan- ces fo totally independent of the general occurrences of the world, that fuppofmg the latter to have been forefeen, yet the former would not have been conjec- tured. The Prophets have not only foretold in general terms a great revolution that would take place in the world by the coming of the Mefllah, but they have delineated fome particular circumllances attending it, which only the eye of Omnifcience could have fore- feen. They have marked out the precife -}- time and I place of our Saviour's birth ; they have defcribed with wonderful exa£l:nefs the diilinguifhing features of his office and character : they have difplayed with equal beauty and truth the effeds and confequences of his advent : and through all their predidions fome - thing pointingito the Meffiah either by direft appli- cation, or by fecondary and diflant reference, is fo interwoven with the general contexture, tbe univerfal fcheme of Prophecy, that by keeping it in our eye, we fhall be furnilhed with a clue to trace out their ulti- mate defign and contemplate their mutual connedion with, and dependence on each other : for the Tejri- mony of Jefus is thefpirit of Prophecy. This is its rul- ing and its vital principle. Diverted of this, it lofes its fpirit and its power. We behold no confiftency. The * PfaJm, ii. 6, &c. ci. i, &;c. fDan. ix. 24, &.c. ^ Mick. t. 1. SERMON VII. t6s The impreflion of its dignity is weakened ; its objeft is debaled ; its end is darkened. But viewed in "this light, we behold in it a harmony which delights ; a grandeur which aftoniflies ; and from the refult of the whole arifes fuch evidence as carries convidion to the underllanding. The prophet Ifaiah has particularly foretold, that the Mefliah fhould be born of * a virgin, and that he jhould defcend from the family of f David, which was a particular branch of the tribe of Judah. While he points out his miraculous birth, and deicribes his de- icent, he portrays his charafter in colours fo ftriking and diftinguiftiing, as to render its appropriation to Chrift, obvious to every one who compares the pic- ture with the original. It was this holy Prophet that foretold, that the Meffiah fhould be J deftitute of out- ward power or influence to attrad the efteem, and en- fure the attachment of the world ; that though in the eye of God he fhould be § tbe cbief cor?ter-JIone, ele^y precious ; yet that he fhould be jj afione of ftumhling and a rock of qffeiice to men who were guided by the fprings which in general actuate the human breafl, fuch as intereft, ambition, and the love of fenfual en- joyments : and particularly it was foretold, that the ^ Jews fjouldfall on ihis rock ; fhould refufe to build on him as the only foundation of their hopes ; but fhould in their attempt to fhake and overthrow it, be themfelves fcattered and broken to pieces. The fame Prophet declared, that he fnould ** veil the eyes of the wife and learned, and preach the Gofpel to the poor and illiterate ; that he fhouid f f rellore light to the blind, health to. the difeafed, and light to thofe who had been. opprelTed with darknefs ; that he lliould teach the true and perfect way, and ihould be the great inflruftor of the Gentiles j that || kings L 3 fliould *Ifdiah vii. 14. t ix. 6, 7. xi. I, 2. \ liii. T, 2, 3. § xxviii. 1.6, Ji,viu. 14, 15. ^ Ibid. ** vi. 9, lo, II. ft xlfi- i, &c. \\ b:. 10. 1 56 SERMON VH. Ihould fall down before him, and all nations pay him homage and obedience ; that his reign Ihould be gentle and benevolent ; and that the influence of his gofpel fiiould harmonize the jarring * pallions of man- kind, and I together with the knowledge and worfhip of the true Godi eftablilh peace and purity on the earth. In the fifty-third chapter, the Prophet gives a moft flriking and affeding pidure of the temper and be- haviour of the JMefliah amidft the mofl diftreiTmg and humiliating fcenes through which he pafled. His death, confidcrcd as the great propitiation for the fms of the whole world, was an objeft of fuch vail im- portance, that it pleafed the divine Being ftrongly to mark the more diflinguifhing circumftances of it in prophetic language ; to the end that our faith in him might have every evidence to confirm it that was neceifary to give fatisfadion to modefl and impartial inquirers. The fad: in every refped correfponded with the prediction ; and fo far was the prophet in- troduced into the fecret counfels of the divine mind, that when he fpoke of future events, he appears to be relating their pad hiftory : for to that omnifcient God, whofe light direded the prophet's eye through the darkefl receffes of diftant ages, prefcience and accomplifhment are the fame ; and the future and the pall form but one objed. Hence the moll ftrik- ing fcenes of our Lord's paflion are delineated by the prophetic pencil with the fame truth and exadnefs, as if they had been drawn on the fpot when the fecret volume of the divine decrees was unrolled, and when that which had been forefeen in vifion was exhibited in realityj. The ancient Prophecies concerning § the rude infults and the ungracious taunts of the people ; their calling • Ifaiah Iv. 1.3. j Ivi. 6, 7, 8. | Compare Mark, xv. ij, *8. § Pfalm xxii. 7, 18. SERMON VIL 1^7 carting lots for his veflure, and parting his garments amongft them ; * the foldier's attack on his dead body ; and his being lodged after death in | the fepulcher of the rich ; literally defcribe thofe circum- ftances which did in fa£t attend the paffion of our . blefled Lord. Prophecy became more clear and illufbrious, a:> the day-fpring from on high advanced. Its lall period fucceeded the return of the Jews from the captivity of Babylon : and the three prophets, Haggai, Zech- ariah, and Malachi, give a ftriking account of the charafter and office of the Meffiah ; and of the glo- rious efte6ls of his advent. I have not time to enlarge on the particular nature and diflindl: objefts of thofe later Prophecies ; nor to point out their immediate correfpondeiice with the fafts to which they related, and by which they were illuflrated and fulfilled. It will be fufficicnt to fpeak of them with a general reference ; and their applica- tion to our bleifed Lord will be obvious to every one that has the {lighted knowledge of the great end of his million, and of the means wh^ch he made ufe of to accomplifh that end. J Thus the completion of diftant and unconnefted Prophecies in the life and charadter, the fufferings and the triumphs of our blelTed Saviour point him out as the Mejjiah ivhich was to come ; and in con- currence with the Miracles he wrought from a fyilem of external evidence, illuilrious, harm.onious, and convincing-. The time will not permit me to enlarge on the ftriking Prophecies of our blefled Lord : but they were fuch as gave additional evidence to his divine charaftcr, and clearly proved him to be filled with a fpirit more than human. He uttered numerous Pre- dictions * Zcch. xii. 10. f Ifajah liii. 9, t ^<^^ Ha^. 11. 4, &c. ZecK. vL Ji, &c. Mai. iii. i, i, 3. iv. i, z. i68 S ,4^ K M O N VII. dfdions of events altogether improbable on the ground of prefent appearances, and fuch as the moft penetrating mind could neither have forefeen, nor conjedured ; much lefs have defcribed y/ith all their peculiarities, and marked out the feveral incidents that attended them. Our blexTed Lord foretold his own death, vvith all Its diftinguifhing circumllances. He foretold the treachery of one difciple, and the cowardice of another. He predicted the perfecutions to which his followers would be expofed ; the oppofition whicli fliould be- made againft the gofpel, and its ex- traordinary and glorious triumph over the power and policy of the world. He foretold the aftonifliing (and to all human views improbable) fate of the tem- ple of Jerufalem, and the fignal deftrudion of the ci- ty. He even foretold the period, when this awful event fliould take place, and defcribed the very en- figns of thofe arms that were to e^e^ the direful ca- taftrophe. He foretold the various calamities that fhould befall the Jewifh natior., and the total ruin in which their church and flate fhould be involved. All that was predifted was fully, clearly, and literally ac- compliflied. The temple was levelled to the ground ; nor could imperial manlEcence, when cxercifed vv-ith a malignant view to confront the Prophecy of our Lord, renew the flrudture, or even remove the ruins of it, for the ere£tion of another edifice. The jews were overtaken by the fevered: inflictions of Heaven, and the blood of him whom they had crucified, was revenged on their children and their country ; while to this day they remain the fignal monuments of the truth of Prophecy ; and hiving totally lofl ihe fcc^irc^ and having no lawgiver independently of a foreigu . tribunal, they afford a vlfible and ftanding proof, that the Shiloh is conic, 1o ivbcm the gathcrin? of the people Jhould he. From S- E R MO N VII. i6cf From a revelation thus authenticated by a long and {lupendou3 train of Miracles which bear the very (tamp and feal of omnipotence j and by a ftriking and connected feries of Prophecies, literally and ex- actly accomplifiied in the perfon of its author ; Pro- phecies of events, which the eternal wifdom could alone have forefeen, and the eternal power alone hav« brought to pafs ; from a revelation, I fay, authenticated by fuch overpowering evidence, what rational inquirer can withhold his alTent ? Or where, we may boldly afiv, amidll the numerous varieties of religious opinion, which in all ages of the world have influenced the belief and direded the practice of mankind, where fliall we find a fyitem that can boaft of atteftations in any degree equal, or fmi- ilar to thofe of the gofpel ? Let the adverfaries of our holy faith point out a religion that bears fach vifible impreffions of an Almighty hand ; let them do this, and we are content to renounce our caufe, to forgo for ever, what we now cannot but affert, the exclu- five title of Chriltianity to the venerable character of truth. Surely in vain will they feek for fuch a parallel in all the fiftions of Mahometifm. We have already examined the lofty jnetenfions of the prophet of Arabia : but inftead of evidence we have found extravagant and confident afl'ertions ; Jnllead of argument we have heard bold and confufed declamation. When called upon by his unbelieving countrymen to produce proofs of his miffion, and to work fome Miracle in atteflation of his title to the Prophetic office, in the evafive language of impofture he Ihrunk from the juft and pertinent requilition ; and with a tone of affe£ted dignity, referred them to the fupernatural elegance and fublimity of the Koran. The Redeemer of mankind, in anfwer to the pious fcruples of his friends, or the captious queflions of his enemies, with the fanie majeftic fmiplicity of an upright i-jo SERMON VII. upright and elevated mind, appealed to ihe Works, 'which he had wrought in his Father^ s ?iame ; to the fick whoni he had healed, the blind who had receiv- ed their fight, the lepers whom he had cleanfed, and the dead whom he had raifed to life. If for a moment we admit, even in its utmoil ex- tent, that wildeil claim of the impoflor to the boaft- ed miracle of the Koran ; yet weak and equivocal rs the evidence it affords, when compared with thofe mighty works which dignify and confirm the minif- try of Jefus Chrilt. The reality gf this pretended Miracle, and the proof which a'rifes from it, can onlv be determined at the fallible tribunal of tafte and criticifm ; but the works of Jefus, inftead of reflmg on the precarious ground of imagination, derive their credit from the teftimony of the fenfes, of all depo- fitions the moil faithful and unqueftionable. Nor is the inferiority of the religion of Mahomet to that of Chrift lefs fa-iking and obvious with refpeft to the atteftation of Prophecy, than it is with regard to Miracles. But to enter into a regular and formal contrait of the two religions, would in either cafe be unneceiTary, and even impofhble. For amidft all the unfubftantial vifions of Mahometifm, amidll all the arrogant pretences of its founder, we are unable to difcover any proofs which can with the leafl fiiadovv- of reafon, be oppofed to the folid and convincing evidence of the gofpel. Allowing, however, ex hypothefi (what never can be granted in reality) the juftice of that extravagant claim of the audacious impollor to certain prediclions^ which once exilled in our fcriptures ; admitting yet further, the propriety of the interpretation by which his infatuated followers flill labour to wrefl a variety of palVages, in fupport of his pretenfions ; yet ever* on thefe fuppofitions, who can without prefumptioi> <:ompare thefc vague and equivocal telHmonies to the SERMON VII. 171 the pointed and decifive evidence which arifes from the vafi:, the fplendid fcheme of Chriflian Prophecy ? A fcheme, which, by its magnificence overpowers the imagination, and of whofe grandeur the moft; exalted dercription can convey but faint and inadequate ideas. We behold, with aflonifhment, a fpirit of Prophe- cy pervading all time ; commencing fo early as the fall of man, and extending to the final confummation of all things : we fee it uniformly charafterifmg one perfon ; firfl by dark and obfcure intimations, then gradually unfolding itfelf with brighter and brighter luftre at every ftep, till the appearance of him who was its ultimate end and objeft. In Him and his A- poftles, but particularly in his beloved Difciple, we behold it once more renewed, and predifting with peculiar exaftnefs every important event which fliould befall his church, even from its earlieft eftablifhment down to that period of awful expectation, when the great plan of divine grace Ihall be brought to a glo- rious and confident conclufion, and the myfterious counfels of the Almighty, refpecling the Chriflian difpenfation, fhall be for ever clofed in judgment. SERMOiT SERMON VIIL LUKE XIX. 22. OUT OF THINE OWN MGUTH WILL I JUDGE THEE. W: HEN the Koran, by the revelation of its feveral chapters, during the long period of -more than twenty years, \yas at lafl: completed, the Arabian prophet may be conceived (landing forth to public view, and funimoning the contempor??ry world and all pofterity, to hear his unvarying tedimcny to its certainty and truth. With his volume in his hand he comes forv/ard, and in fuch terms as thefe he calls on the living and the unborn to he his judges. " This is the Book of God : it contains his Icill "and feofl inviolable commands ; it proceeded imxAediately from heaven : and was delivered by the mouth of an an- gel : blefled are the faithful that fhall receive its doc- trines, and curfed are thofe that oppofe its author-^ itv." But before we yield up our alTent to thefe unqual- ified and peremptory demands, we are naturally led to inquire upon what reafons they are founded. The feeble attempt that was made to fupport them by an empty ^i\tvj of external evidence, has already been fufficiently expofed. We will now proceed to exam- ine, whether this pretended revelation be with greater fuccefs atteiled internally, by the fanctions of natural religion, and the eftablifhed opinions of mankind. That we may advance by infallible deduftions to theconclufion v/e fliall form concerning the credibil- ity' SERMON VIII. 173 ity of the Koran, let us take care to build nothing on the periihable ground of prefent prejudices •, nothing on the quc;lionable authority of any prevailing fyf- tem ; nothing on any local and temporary maxims, that may be peculiar to age or country. Let us even exceed the meafure of common juflice and common, candour ; and try the Koran by a tefh contrived by one of its moll zealous and fuccefsful champions in that age when it w^as pubhihed, and among the peo- ple to whom it was firft propofed. When the Caliph Omar, the contemporary and companion of Mahomet, was foli^ited to fpare the ce- lebrated Library of Alexandria, he replied to this ef- feft : " Either the contents of thofe books agree with what is written in the holy Koran, or do not agree. if they do agree, then the Koran is futlicient, and thofe books are ufelefs : if they do not agree, they are pernicious, and mud be dellroyed." Nov/, fmce the religion of Mahomet confiantly ad- mits the authority, and appeals to the teilimony of former revelations, tlic Lav/ and the Gofpel ; v/e may, with lome limitation, juilly avail ourfelves of thefe principles in our inquiry into its truth. First, if the Koran agrees in hifcorlcal informa- tion and doclrines with prior revelations, without any addition or improvement, it is evidently unnefl'a" i'V ; and, therefore, it feems highly improbable that ;:fhouldhave been revealed. Secondly, if the Koran contains facts or doclrines contrary to thofe which have been already revealed^ it (lands felf condemned as an impoflure. If, in examining the Koran by the firft of thofe principles which I have aflumed, we exclude fo much of it as its author appears to have borrowed from the jewifii and ChrifLian fcriptures, it can never be al- lowed that the little v.-hich remains after this deduc- tion, is of fufiicient confequence or neceffity to jufti- 174 S E R M O N VIII. fy the fuppofition of an immediate interference of the Deity, by a new and folemn revelation. For when the Almighty Governour of the univcrfe, whofa diltinguilhing charafteriftic it is to do nothing in vain, deviates from the ordinary courfe of his providence, and, in companion to the weaknefs and the ignorance of his creatures, gracioufly condefcends to inftrud; them by a particular revelation of his will ; it is na- tural to expedl that the information contained in luch revelation, fhould be, like the manner in which it is conveyed, interefting and extraordinarv. To fuppofe, therefore, that God has thus revealed to mankind what is in itfelf trifling and unimportant ; a: what was before equally known to them, either by former manifellations of himfelf, or by the ufe of their own faculties, is to afcribe to him a conduct in every refpect unworthy his wifdom ; to fuppofe him to do v/hat is evidently unnecelTary to be done ; and thus to aft in diredii contradi£lion to every idea which reafon and experience teach us to form of his moral government. Amidft the numerous merits, whether fancied or real, which the enthufiafm of its advocates has afcrib* ed to the Koran, to that of Novelty it has, perhaps, of' all others, the lead claim. Were it conliitent with the decorum of this time and place to enter into fo minute a fpecies of invefligation, it would be no dif- ficult talk to point out the feveral fources from whence the impoftor derived almoft every dodrine, precept, and ceremony, which it prefcribes. But on the pre- fent occafion it will be fufRcicnt to our purpofe, to inftance in fome few of the mofi; important and in- terefting particulars. Of the various and incongruous materials which compofe the mif-fnapen ftrufture of Mahometan fu- perftition, the far greater and more valuable part may be traced immediately, or ultimately, to the fcrip- tures . SERMON VIII. 175 tuies of truth. To them in particular mud we have recourre for the origin of whatever we difcover of lubHmity in the defcriptions, of purity in the doc- trines, or of found morahty in the precepts of the ■ Koran. If it fometimes furprifes us with unufual grandeur ; and, quitting the ordinary flyle, magnificently paints the Almighty fitting on the eternal throne, encom- pailed with clouds ajid darknefs, and giving laws to the univorfe ; we inltantly recognize the hallowed man- ner, the ideas, and even the language, of the Hebrew prophets. When it describes the various attributes ol' the Deity, whether phylical or moral j when it re- prefents him as omniprefent, omnifcient, omnipotent j as true, and merciful, and juft ; it conveys no new, no clearer notions of his incomprehenfible eflence than we before poilelTed : it only reechoes the doc- trines, and feebly imitates the expreffions, of the in- fpired penman of the Old and New Tellament. Ev- en that grand and fundamental dodrine of the Unity of the Supreme Bting, the ertablilhment of which was conftantly alledged by the impoftor as the primary caufe of liis pretended million, contains no novel or unknown truth. It is the leading principle of the religion of nature ; and it coniiituted one of the rnoft important and diftinguiihing objects of a former rev- tlation. The manifeftation and prefervation of this momentous truth, was one great end to which the i\Iofaic inilitiition was ordained to be fubfervient : and even the Gofpcl, though it unfolds new fcenes to our Hitonifhed view, and prefents us with a clearer and fuller difcovery of the divine nature, by revealing to us the rnyiLerlous doctrine of the exiftence of three lliltintt I'erlbns in the Godhead ; yet it ftill maintains, and prcfcrvcs inviolate, the Unity of the Supreme Being. But 170 3 E R M O N Vm. ^ -^ ^^fp^rr^,^ Qj^jy q£ ^ Yude and impcrfeft knowl- ilrines of the Gofpel, and probably de- . ..<.L knowledge from its moil corrupt and he- .^... ^i loliowers, Mahomet feems to have entertained very grofs and miftaken ideas of the Chriflian Trini- ty, and to have been totally ignorant of the perfect confiilence of that opinion with the Unity of the Diety. Hence we hear him continually reafoning after this manner — * " Verily Chriil Jeius the fon of Mary is the apodle of God, and his word, and a fpirit pro- ceeding from him. Believe therefore in God, and his apoilles, and fay not, there are three Gods. For- bear this ; it will be better for you : God is but one God. Far be it from him that he (hould have a fon t Unto him belongeth whatfoever is in heaven and on earth : and God is a fufEcient protestor. Chrift doth not proudly difdain to be the fervant of God, neither the Angels who approach near to his pref- ence : and vv^hofo difdaineth his fervice, and is puffed up with pride, God will gather them all to himfef at the iaft day.'' Hence too we behold almoft every page of his pre- tended revelation marked with the fierceft inveftive.s, and denouncing the fevered woes on all who impiouf- ly prefume to rob the Almighty of the honour due unto his name, by alfociating other beings with him as his equals, and partakers of his majefty and glory. Thus the Koran, inftead of contributing any thing to the removal of that veil of darknefs which conceals the ineffable pcrfei^lions of the Almighty from the view of ihort fighted man ; inftead of enlarging our ideas, and extending our knowledge of the divine na- ture and attributes ; tends to obfcure and weaken our perceptions of them, and to make void that rev- elation of himielf which God had before vouchfafed to the v/orid. But . * Sale's Koraa, edit. 4tc. p. £o. SERMON VIII. ^n But if it be thus exceptionable, as containing no improvement of former revelations, by conveying dearer or more diftinft notions of the Deity ; it is alfo equally liable to objeftion with refpe6l to the wor- ■fliip which it prefcribes. It was frequently the triumphant boaft of the great Apoftle of the Gentiles, that the Gofpcl of Jefus Chrift had for ever freed mankind from the intoler- able burden of ceremonial obfervances. But the re- ligion of Mahomet renews and perpetuates the Ilave- ry, by prefcribing to its votaries a ritual flill more oppreliive, and entangling them again in a yoke of bondage yet more fevere than that, of the Law. The Mofaic ceremonies indeed (hov/ever deflitute of merit in tliemfelves) were yet, when confidcred with a ref- erence to the events with which they were connefted, flrikingly ufeful and fignificant. But arbitrary and unmeaning are the inftitutions of the prophet of Arabia ; inftitutions, whofe higheft, and indeed only ufe, even in the eftimation of their rnoll zealous advocates, is that of proving the pietv, and exercifmg the • obedience, of the faithful. And even thofe ceremonies which he evidently borrowed from the Jewifh Legiflator, no longer poffefling any relative merit, and being no longer commemorative of part, or typical of future events, ceafe to be ra- tional and exprellive ads of devotion. But whatever may be the propriety, and whatever the utility, of thole numerous and irldbme obfervan- ces with which the Mahometan ritual is burthened, fcarcely one can be pointed out which is either new or peculiar to that inftitution. Befides thofe which its author prefcribed in imitation of the Law of Mofes, there are others which he derived from lefs pure and venerable fources ; from the fenfelefs and unauthor- ized traditions of the Rabbins, and from the fuperfti-. tious cuftoms of the barbarous and pagan Arabs. M Qi lyS SERMON VII!. Of thofe carnal ordinances, ablutions, and proftfa-* flons, with which the follower of Mahomet is ccm- manded to approach the great Father of fpirits ; and of the rigorous falls, by which he is direded to mor- tify his corrupt afteftions ; the far greater part had been before introduced amongfl the eifentials of re- ligion, and obferved with a fcrupulous exactnefs by the later Jews : and many of them are laid to have prevailed even amongft the idolaters of Arabia. It was a command repeatedly and forcibly impreff- ed on the Ifraelites by God himfelf, that they Ihould not, on pain of themoft exemplary vengeance, prefume to transfer the impious ceremonies of idol worfhip into the fervice of the living God ; or approach the altar of Jehovah with the fame facrifices and rites, where- with the nations around them ferved their Gods. But the daring policy of Mahomet adopted, without hefitation, the fanciful and fuperititious ceremonies with which his countrymen adored their imaginary deities ; and fcrupled not to fanctify them with the authority, and engraft them on the worfnip, of the one true, eternal, and felf-fubfifting God. Of this kind, amidft a variety of infhances too numerous to be recounted in this place, is that great and meritori- ous ad of Mahometan devotion, the pilgrimage to the holy city ; an aO: which the prophet has enjoined, and the pious MulTulman implicitly performs, as ne- ceffary to the obtaining pardon of his fnis, and quali- fying him to be a partaker of the alluring pleafures and exquifite enjoyments of paradife. Even thofe parts of the Koran, which are at firfl viev/ moft captivating by the appearance of Novelty, and in which its author feems to have given the reins to a luxuriant imagination, and to have expatiated at large in the boundlefs regions of fancy, will, upon a clofcr examination, be found to contain as little of , novel, as they do of important information. With refped SERMON VIIT. ^7d refpCiSt to the great and momentous do£lrIne of a fu- ture Hate, and the condition of the foul after its de- parture from the body, it muft indeed be acknowledg- ed, that the prophet of Arabia has prefented us with a nearer profpedl of the invifible world, and difclofed. to us a thoufand particulars concerning it, which the holy fcriptures had wrapped in the moll profound and myllerious filence. But, in his various reprefenta- tions of another life, he generally defcends to an un- ncceflary minutenefs and particularity, which excites difguft and ridicule, inftead of reverence : and even his mofl animated defcriptions of the joys of paradife, or the torments of hell, however ftrong and glowing; the colours in which they are painted, are yet far in- ferior in point of true fubiimity, and far lefs calculat- ed to promote the interefls of piety by raifmg the hopes and alarming the fears of rational beings, than that degree of obfcurity in which the future life of the gofpel is ftill involved, and thofe more general terms in which tis promifes and threatnings are propofed to mankind. Our holy religion, by the ref- urreftion of its great author, affords an evidence of another life peculiar to itfelf ; an evidence far more conclufive and fatisfadory than any which the Koran, with all its arrogance, can furnilh, in fupport of this interelling and awful truth. It alfo at the fame time reveals to us every thing concerning the mode of our exiftence in that life, which appears to be in any de- gree conducive to our comfort and happinefs in the prefent. Admitting, however, that a more particu- lar and circumftantial knowledge of a future ftate, than the Gofpel contains, was neceifary to the well being of mankind ; admitting alfo that the Koran has fupplied this defeft, and communicated this val- uable information to the world ; yet dill we may with propriety deny the neceffity of the Mahometan rev- elation. Wq know that the impoflor conHantly pre- M 2 tended iHo S E, R M O N Vllir. tended to have received thefe flupendous fecrets, by the miniilry of an angel, from that eternal book in v/hlch the divine decrees have been written by the finger cf the Ahnighty from the foundation of the world : but the learned inquirer will difcover a more accellible, and a far more probable fource from whence they might be derived, partlv in the wild and fanciful opinions of the ancient Arabs, and chiefly in thofe exhaufllefs ftores of marvellous and impi-obable fic- tion, the vvorks of the Rabbins. Hence that roman- tic fable of the Angel of Death, whofe peculiar office it is at the deflined hour to dillblve the union betwixt foul and body, and to free the departing fpirit from its prifon of flefh. Hence that imaginary, yet dread- ed Tribunal, before which, when his body is depofit- ed in the grave, the trembling Muifulman, on the au- thority of his prophet, believes he muft appear, to render an exadl account of his faith and aftions. Hence too the various defcriptions of the general Ref- urredion and final Judgment, with which the Koran every where abounds ; and hence the vaft, but ideal Balance, in which the a6lions of all mankind fhall then be impartially v/eighed, and their eternal doom be afTigned them either in the regions of blifs or mif- ery, according as their good or evil deeds flmll be found to preponderate. Here too may be traced the grand and original outlines of that fenfual Paradife, and thofe luxurious enjoyments, which were fo fuc- cefsfully employed in the Koran to gratify the ardent genius of the Arabs, aiid allure them to the ftandard of the prophet. By proceeding in this manner, it might eafily be fhewn how little there is of novelty or originahty in the pretended revelation of Mahom- et ; but I forbear to trefpafs on your patience by multiplying unnecefTary examples. Itisfuflicient to. repeat, what I have before obferved, that the Koran dees not contain one fmgle dodrine which may not fairly SERMON VIII. j8, fairly be derived either from the Jewifh and ChriRiau fcriptures, from the fpurious and Apocryphal gof- pels current in the Eaft, from the Talmudical legends, or from the traditions, cufloms, and opinions t)f the Arabians. The fame obfervation, which I have ap- phed to the doftrines, may, with fome few limita- tions, be likewife extended to the precepts which the Arabian legiflator has enjoined. That the Koran, amidll a various and confufed heap of ridiculous, and even immoral precepts, contains many intereft- ing and inilruftive leffons of morahty, cannot with truth be denied. Of thefe, however, the merit is to be afcribed, not to the feeble imitation, but to the great and perfe£b original from which they vvere, manifeiUy drawn. Inftead of improving on the Chriilian precepts by a fuperior degree of refinement ; initead of exhibiting a purer and more perfed: fyf- tem of morals than that of the gofpel, the prophet of Arabia has miierably debafed and weakened even what he has borrovy-ed from that fyitem. Every duty which he enjoins, every precept which he enforces, in imitation of Chrift and his Apoflles, though it may ilill command fome regard, has yet loft much of its native beauty and majefty, and bears flrong and evi- dent marks of the impure and corrupt channel through which it has pafTed. Thus, if he fometimes, in a tone of authority, fummons his followers to the practice of the various duties of charity ; if he com- mands them to give alms, to relieve the diftreifed, to forgive injuries ; yet bafe and narrow is the principle on v/hich he enforces thefe amiable virtues ; when compared with the more liberal and beneficient fpir- it of the gofpel of Jefus. Inftead of exercifmg a vague and univcrfal charity, the dii'clple of IMahoraet i^ exprefsly taught to confine his benevolence to the followers of the prophet ; inftead of conferring hi; good offices on thofe whole faith fnall happen to dif- M 3 fer 182 SERMON Vm. fer from his own, he is warned againft indulging the tender weaknefs of humanity, he is commanded to wage perpetual war with the guilty race, and to deem it a meritorious act to extirpate thefe enemies of his God from off the face of the earth. But if fuch be the inferiority of the Koran to pre- ceding revelations (for the fame inferiority is obferva- ble in every other duty which it enjoins) it alfo la- bours under a difadvantage equally (Iriking, with re- ipect to the motives by which thofe duties are en- forced. Though different be the reprefentation of the joys and miferies of another life, which the Gofpel and the Koran propofe to their refpeclive followers, yet the commands of both reft ultimately on the fame gener- lf i84 S E R U O N VIIL himfelf on this fubjeft, where fpeaking of the Jewg he fays, " They have fpoken agaiiiib Mary a grievous; Calumny ; and have laid, Verily we have flain Chriit Jefus, the fon of Mary, the Apoflleof God ; yet they flew hira not, neither crucified him, but he was re- prefented by one in his likenefs : and verily they who difagreed concerning him, were in a. doubt as to this matter ; and had no fure knowledge thereof, but followed only an uncertain opinion. They did not really kill him y but God took him up unto him- felf: and God is mighty and wife."* Mahomet indeed was not the firfl: to propagate thi:? bold and extravagant falfehood. Even in the earliell age of the church, whilft the blood of Chriil had been yet recently fhed at Jernfalem, there arofe a fe6t who with fmgular affrontery maintained, that he had fuf- fered in appearance only, and not in reality ; and that the Jews and officers of Pilate had waifted their inef- fectual rage on any airy phantom, who feemed to endure the' tortures which they inflidled, and at laft to expire on the. crofs. But the apocrypal gofpel of Barnabas, a work which feems to have been original- ly forged by heretical Chriflians, and fmce interpo-^ lated to favour the views of Mahomet and his follow- ers, correfponds more exactly with the reprefentation of the Koran. "We are there told, that in the night in which Jefus was betrayed, at the i nil ant when the Jews were about to apprehend him in the garden, he was miraculouily carried up into heaven by • the miniflry of Angels ; whilft the traitor Judas, taken fuddenly in the fnare which himfelf had laid, was crucified in his likenefs and his ftead. But whatever may be the corrupt fourcc from whence the impoftor derived fo palpable and notori- ous a falfehood ; whatever be the caufe which pro- cured its admittance, whether ignorance or defign j the ■ • Koran, p. 79. S E R M O N VIIL 1S5 the argument is ftill equally conclufivc agalnft the veracity of the Koran. It' additional proofs were neceflfary to refute the impious claim of the Mahometan impolture to a di- vine original, I might'ftill farther obferve, that it is jiot only inconfiflent with* preceding revelations, but alfo with itfelf. The advocates for the Mahometan caufc labour indeed to obviate any obje6lion which may be drawn from thefe glaring ccntradidions, by the dodrine of abrogation. God, fay they, in purfuance of thp great plan of his providence, was pleafed to command ma- ny things in the holy Koran, which for wife and good reafons he afterwards revoked. But not to mention the doubts and uncertainty, which muft thus have been unavoidably introduced into a revelation, which ought to be perfedly clear and explicit in all that it commands ; it is evident that fuch a condu£t, though well accommodated to the lliifting policy of a capri- cious mortal, is totally incompatible with the eternal Vvifdom of the immutable God. '■ Every revelation which profefles to come from God, {hould doubtlefs be fuited to our apprehenfions of his perfections ; but numberlefs are the inflances in which the Koran either com.mands or permits what is plainly contradiftory both to the nature of the Deity, and to that original law of right and wrong which he has univerfally imprefied on mankind. In- deed the general chara(5ler of its precepts is too ftrongly marked, for the moft inattentive obferver to doubt of the origin from whence they flowed. The impure defigns which gave birth to the whole fyftem, may be traced in almoft every fubordinate part ; even its fublimell defcriptions of the Deity, even its mod exalted moral precepts, not infrequently either terminate in, or are interwoven with, fome provifion to- gratify the inordinate cravings of ambition, or fomc 1 85 SERMON VIII. fome licence for the indulgence of the corrupted paf- fions of the human heart. It has given a fanftion to fornication ; and, if any ^A'eight be due to the exanii pie of its author, it has juitified adultery. It has made war, and rapine, and bloodlhed, provided they be exercifed againll: unbelievers, not only meritorious acts, but even eifentiai duties to the good MufTulman ; duties, by the performance of which he may fecure the conflant favour and protection of God and his prophet in this life, and in the next entitle himfelf to the boundlefs joys of paradife. Thus has the pretended revelation of Mahomet accomplifhed the great end for which it was defigned, by reforming the corruptions which time, and the perverfenefs of human nature, had unhappily con- fpired to introduce into preceding revelations J And thus fignally has it improved on the pure and fpirit- ual morahty of the gofpel ! From the whole then of what has been faid, we are juflified in concluding, that the Koran, when confid- ered by itfelf, independently of other revelations, i^ in every refpect unworthy the God of purity ; and that, when taken on its own principle, as grounded on the law and the gofpel, it is nctorioufly and indif-^ putably falfe. If now we apply the fame reafoning to Chriflian- jty, as fubfequent to the law of Mofes, v/hich we have already applied to the Koran, the contrail will be found highly fa"^/ourable to our religion. From a view of the nature and qualities of the Mofaic lav/, we fhall be convinced that it was both partial and temporary. The Jews were a diRindt clafs of people, feparated from all nations of the ■world, and prefer ved from mixing with them by means of certain rites and ceremonies, which were evidently defigned to keep this diflindion facred andf inviolable. They - S E- R M O N Vlir. 187 They flood fingle amongft mankind, and bore on them the vifible marks of a divine and appropriate delignation. The general government of Providence was (if I may fo exprefs myfelf) epitomized in the particular fuperintendence of the Duty over this dif- tinguiflied people : it was reduced to a fcalc more contraded indeed, but more flriking. The Jews ilood forward to the world as a proof that there is a God that judges the earth ; and that he whofe name alone is Jehovah, is the mofl high over all. They were feleded to be the depofitaries of thofe holy rec- ords in which the truths of God are revealed, and his precepts are enforced ; and they were ordained to be the means of tranfmitting his name, his worfliip, his promifes, and his predi>c^ SERMON IX. tarly fupcrftition, its flame was not altogether def- troyed. It burnt in fccret at leaft, even in the re- celfes of monaftic retirement ; and though too feeble of itfelf to difpel the gloom that fuiTounded it, yet vas it preferred from total extindion, amidft: the c\ ^merical conceits of the fanatic, and the frivolous co.iten'tions of the reclufe. Rekindling at laft in ail a?e, in which the human mind feemed to emersfe from the darknefs in which it was involved, in which the fpirit of liberty gave dignity and vigour to its ex- ertions, and which the bounty of providence diflin- guifhed by difcovferies the moil falutary to the human race, it foon attained its former lullre : and no lon- ger confined, as in earlier ages, to the opulent or the powerful, it now began to fpread its equal light over the mafs of human kind, and to illurninate thofe ven- erable forms of truth, of religion, and of freedom, v;hich before were hidden from every vulgar eye. Of the Reformation, indeed, it may be faid without the extravagance of partiality, or the declamation of panegyric, that no event, which either hidory has recorded, or philofophy invedigatcd, has been at- tended with fo extenfive and aufpicious a change in private and public life, in the government of nations, and in the manners of individuals, in the fentiments of the higher ranks and the habits of the lower, in the cultivation of every polite attainment which a- dcrns the mind, and the yet greater improvement of every profound fcielice which im'igorates and en- larges it. The progreliion of knowledge has been Confiant in every country where it began ; the fpirit of inquiry has, in every age, comm.unicated itfelf to furrounding nations ; and while our proficiency is fuch as to juflify us in boafling of difcoverics, to fome of which former generations never reached, and to others to which they never afpired, we have, the confolation to refleft, that a wide and unexplo- red . P' A R- T-' I. ^.d\ J red field llill lies open for- ■t?iie"rnorb imv/caried en- Ileavours and the brighteit talents : that our own liftticejfs 'his ifideed been lb -rapid as to animate their Emulation, a«d y^t that our prdgrefs is hitherto fo imperfeQ, as to facilitate, not to preclude their moft vigorous exertions. In a word, from this eventful period the fpirit of fcijnce has been hadening towards peri'ecHon. In eVery country diilinguifhed by the Chriftian naiTle^ its influence has been felt, and it;? emulation has been known. And. when we review mankinil as inhabitants of the fame globe, and mark the revolutions by which as men, or as nations, they are diftinguifiled, the character of Chriftian may be determined by the fuperior degree of intelligence which accompanies and adorns it. yach is the extreme diverfitv of character to be found among the nations who have embraced Ma- hometanifm and Chriitianity ; and fuch the appear-^ ancii which thefe great diviiions of mankind affum.e tmder this diilin&ion of religious opinions. In the Eaft, under the inlluence of Mahometan' belief, the human mind appears to have loft fomewhat of its ca* pacity and power ; the natural progrcfs of mankind, whether in government, in manners, or in fcience, has been retarded by fome fecret principle of private indolence or external control ; and over the va- rious nations who have either alTented to the faith, or fubmittcd to the arms of the impoitor, fome uni- verfal, but baleful inlluence feems to have operated, fo as to countcraft every diverfity of national charac- ter, and reftrain every principle of national exertion. In the Weft, under the happy aufpices of Chriftian- ity, men appear to have attained a vigour in their intelleclual exertions, and extent in their i'ntelleclual purfuits, and a fuccefs.in their intelleftual cultiva- tion, utterly unknown in any former period of their hiftory. Their purfuits, whether in fcience, or iri art. 204 SERMON IX. nrt, have been guided by a bolder fplrit, and rewaf d- ed with more illuflrious fuccefs than in any former age of fpeculaticn. The boundaries wliich before feem to have been impofed to the exertions of the human mind, and to have hmited not only the pro- grefs of genius, but even the profpeds of literary ambition, have been extended or removed. The regular motions and compalitive magnitudes of the celellial bodies, the fimple but wonderful laws by which the material world is regulated ; the incon- fiderabie proportion which the earthly and folar fyf- tems bear to the vafl and glorious works of omnipo- tence, hold a diftlnguifhed rank in the fupcriority of modern over ancient philofophy. The origin and combination o, our ideas, the diilind offices and mu- tual connexions of our mental faculties, the primary and unalterable foundations of morality, and the de* pendence of its various modes on collateral and ad- ventitious circumftances, have been invcfligated with unwearied diligence, and explained with the niceft precifion. To thefe abftrnfe and yet fublime fpecu- lations, w-e may add the difcovery of printing ; an event more interefting, perhaps, than any other in« ventions, however profound be their principles, and however extenfive their application ; for by this dif-» covery knowledge is fpread through a wide ex- tent : every ufeful or ingenious eifort of the under* {landing is prefervcd as a model for imitation, or an incentive to improvement : above all, an impregna- ble barrier feems to be fixed acralnfl: the return of o general ignorance and barbarifm, and thofe dreadful revolutions which have fometlmes fwept av/ay the labours of formel- ages, and plunged even enlightened nations into fudden and hopelefs darknefs. But the refearchcs of Chriflian nations have not been confined only to thofe topics vvhich merely ex- ercifc curlofity, or excite admiration ; en the con- trary. P A R T T. '205 Trary, utility has been united with truth, as well in the Itudies of the few, as in the experience of the many. To the affairs of men, as well as to the ab- ftraclions of philofophy, the fpirit of fcience has a- mong ourfelves been applyed : the principles of government and the rights of men have been afcer- tained ; the limits of power and obedience have been defined ; and the rights of nations, no longer repof- ed upon the infecure foundation of habit or opinion, have under the influence of philofophy acquired the clearnefs of demonflration, and the firmnefs of prin- ciple. Since the asra of their improvement, the na- tions of Chriflianity have emulated each other in their progrefs towards refinement. The mod honourable triumphs, and the moft favourite fubjects of congratu- lation, have been thofe of learning and fcience ; and the glory moll ardently coveted, and moft readily beflowed, has been that of difl'eminating truth and knowledge amongft mankind. Every fucceeding age has marked the increafe of their acquifitions and the extenfion of their views. The flame of fcience, when once kindled, has pervaded every defcription of men, among whom Ghriftianity has been known ; and nations who were once fevered from the knowledge of the world by the ignorance and barbarity in which they were involved, have now rifen into diftinftion, and affumed their place among the enlightened divif- ions of mankind. Through the whole fcheme of his moral govern- ment the Deity has connefted by fecret ties the fu- ture and prefent interefts of men ; and confequent- ly has made the efforts of human wifdom the inrtru- ments of a wider and moi*e vigorous efficacy to his own extraordinary interpofitions. In various degrees, indeed, and under various cir- cumftances, the vices and the virtues, the ignorance and the knowledge of men are fubfervient to his un- fearchable .so6. ■ S E R r.I O N IX. fearchable purpofes, they form a part of one p;rcut and folic! chain which our reafon cannot niealure ; and long alter their efficacy is thought by- fuperhcial obfervers to be exhaulkd, we are led to trace their necelTary connexion v/itli events very remote in time, and very difiiniilar in kind. When the gofpel was introduced into the world, the difpenfations cf hea- ven were, moH of them, fupernaturai ; and,- confilU 9ntly with the rnode of procedure at this juncture, ihc fooliJJjJ kings of the world -were appointed to confoundi the ivifo. But the^ropri-tv cf this appcintment i:i evinced, und its veiy fuccqls confinued, by a lubfe- quent flate of things, in which extradrciinary mealurea are no longer requinte : and thuti, with a cui:fiitencc which marks every fucceliive (tage of' God's defig^s, us they gradually unfold therafeives to our vic\v, thq gofpel was left to bi^ eltabliihed and diiremina.ted by thofe mciral caufes, b,y. which the vilibie co.urfe oi;' things is regulatt«d., " We therefare not only admit that the I}£ity does, but we infer from every knowu principle of moral htnefs that h - woyjd, fu]>port the. gol^^el ; and draw out the full eiteds vrhich it is ca- pable of producing, by the aid of fecondary and -hu- man means, by learning, by civilization, and govern- ment^ to the improvement cj" \vhich the goi])^l itfeli' has indiredlly contributed, From thcfe obfervaticns \ye inay fee the conlVim- mate propriety of thofe different means which Got.!, employs, in different fituations of things, to carry on the fame rcneral defifrn : fometim.es ufnif]: preternat- ural, and fometlm.es natural means ; fometimes working by the weaknefs of man, and fometimes by his flrength ; and always acting for the noblell ends, by means the mod proper. Every new religion muil be fuppofed to counteract the reigning prejudice:^ and vices of the times ; and confequently no objeQion arifes agaiult lU credibill, tv, - PART I. 207 ty, from the evils to v. hich it for a time expofes thofc perfoiis who have the honefly to profefs, and the courage to diffufe it. But when the fame religion io once ellabliihcd, a fpecies of proof is required, the very reverie of that which was before necellary. On the firft appearance of the gofpel, we find the evidence of it in the patience of thofe who incoun- tered every temporal evil for its fake. During the continuence of that gofpel in the world at large, vv^e obtain other evidences of its divine original, by the fiiare it ha«: in nromotintr the temooral ^ood of thofe who profefs it. When therefore any religion is, as it were, incor- porated Vv'ith the ordinary povidence of God in hi^ moral government, the credibility of it may in a great meafure be determined by its adual and vifiblc influ- ence on the welfare of mankind. Though ultimate- ly directed to higher ends, it is flill relative to the conditution and civcumltanccs of man ; and, as its bciL evidence mull arife from the conformity it has to the attributes of the Deity, it is difficult to con- ceive how any religion can be fuppofed to derive its origin from him, which is hollils to the temporal happinefs of thofe to whom it is given. The being whom it is the object of his gracious v/ill to blefs in a future exiilence, it feems not confident with his wif- dom to opprefs, or deceive, in the prefent. Much therefore would thofe dodtrines want of their bed evidence, which, while they pretended to miniiler to the future v*eifare of mankind, were inilrumental, now, only in their degradation or their ruin. Whether in the nature of the Mahometan and' Chriftian rehgions there be any permanent caufes of this diverfity in their efrecls, affords a fubject of very important and ferious invefti^ation : and if it can be flievv'n that the one is naturally deflrudive of the great pi-inciplec of human welfare, and the other as naturally 2o8 S E R M O N IX. naturally conducive to them, it is to be prcfumed that no mean confirmation will thus arife of their re- fpeftive falfehood and truth. The immediate end of religion, is to prepare man- kind for a future ftate ; but, any in the profecution of this end, there is a collateral eiiecV, which it una- voidably has upon the temporal character of man» The doctrines which it teaches, and the precepts "which it prefcribcs, while they are relative to the di- vifion of his Intellectual and Moral Powers, effect alfo their nature and extent : hence that relig-. ion will moft eflectually conduce to the welfare of man, which moft invigorates and enlarges thefe capa- cities of his mind. The influence of religious perfaafio.n mull always be great, either in improving, or contracting,' the Fac- ulties of the Uuderftanding, Opinions which are the firft received, and the laft parted with ; which are united with all the hopes and ail the fears of hu- manity ; which are feldom doubted of by men of common fenfe, and feldom improved by men of com- mon attainments ; cannot be fuppofed to be indiffer- ent in their efte£ts upon the mind. The uuderftand- ing is equally fubjcft to habits with our other powers ; and according to the manner in which it has been exercifed, or to the reach and extent which it has ac- quired in its common exercifes, v.'ill be its exertion and character in every other employinent. The vo- tary of a week or narrow fuperftition, v/hich exhibits its gods in the fliape, and endows them v/ith the paf- fions, of mankind ; he whofe mind has been accuf- tomed to no higher forms of excellence, and to no brighter objects of contemplation, than the doctrines, which fuch a religion affordSj cannot eafily be imag- ined to poffefs an uuderftanding much elevated or improved ; and will not carry to other employments, that liberal and enlightened fpirit which rational. fpeculations P A R T I. C09 fpeculations excite and confirm. So far as the in- fluence of its truths upon his underllanding extends, his relidon will tend to contraft it ; the difficiiKics which oppofe its progrefs will be" fo far incrcafed, as its former habits have blinded or weakened it ; and, ainidd: this general deprefiion, it can only refume its powers, when fpme unLifuai and important concern calls them forth,. and leads them beyond the limits which had been formerly impofed to them. A re- ligion, on the contrary, which exhibits fiibiirae ob- jects of contemplation ; which arrays its Deity in ev- ery pofTible excellence ; and which mingles none of the infirmities of man with the perfeftions of heaven ; may naturally be fuppofed to im.prove and to exalt the. human underftanding. By giving it, in its com- mon and permanent employments, an object of tran- fceiidantal excellence and magnitude ; by accuilomilig it to high ideas of wifdoni and perfection, it mufh ev- en infenhbly have an influence in Tramping a fimilar character on all iis exertions : and while to the mind and views of the philofopher it affords a portion of the fame fublimity and fpirit, to the common habits of opinion alfo it communicates fomev«;hat of the fame extent, and marks with bolder features the ge- neral character. But the greater influence of reiigious opinion up- on the powers of the human underftanding, arifes from the information which it gives to man of his na- ture and end. All excellence is vclative to the fitu- ation in which it is fliewn ; and, before any kind of ambition can be excited, it is firft necelTary to knov/ what it is that ambition can attain. In the ordinary bufincfs of hfe, the exertions of mankind are proportioned to the probabihty of fuc- cefs. No greater induftry is exerted, and no greater variety of intelligence acquired, than wh,-:it feems ne- ceikiry for the fi.vtion in which it is probably to be O brought 2IO S E R M d N a brought into ufe. The diflferences of fortune and condition thus in a very obvious manner affedl the capacities or acquifitions of the mind. The polfef- for of rank and opulence, who is raifed by fortune to the higher conditions and the greater duties of life, feels himfelf called upon for wider views and more liberal accomplifhments than the generality of man- kind : and, if he pofTeffes the common ambition of his ftation, he will proportion his efforts to the op- portunities which are offered to him, and to the ex- peftations which are formed of him. The poor man, on the contrary, concerning whom no fuch expecta- tions are entertained, and whofe life is probably to be palTed in domeflic duties and corporeal labour, as naturally accommodates his mind to the fituation in which he is to aft ; and feldom is folicitous about any acquifitions, either of knowledge or of virtue, "which are not demanded by his condition : and thus the inequalities of rank and of fortune, which ard produced by the improvements of fociety, have a natural and obvious tendency either to exalt or to deprefs the capacities of their pofl'effors, and to adapt all their exertions to the fituation in which they are to be employed. It is in the fame manner that re- ligion operates on the mind of man. From religion only he learns what are the final views and expefta- tions of his being ; for what purpofe his mental pow- ers were given ; to what ends they lead ; and what higher degrees of excellence they may yet receive. He will, therefore, be led to a:ccommodate his am- bition and his defires to the fenfe he poirefTes of his nature. The confcioufnefs of greater capacity for virtue, will be attended with a ilronger fenfe of ob- ligation to become virtuous. To the poor native of unenlightened countries, ^hat motives can his religion afford to excite the ar- . dour or the adivity of his mind ? The fervice of dei- ties - PART I. 211 ties little elevated above the rank of man, cannot much improve his opinion of the confequence of his being, or animate his defire of their favour ; and a long Futurity to be pafled in the fame occupations which now engage him, or in the narrow circle of animal enjoyment, cannot produce in him any high- er conceptions of the dignity of his nature, or ani- mate him to the exertion of any other powers, -than thofe that are to be employed in the life for which he thinks himfelf deftined. Little raifed in his purfuits above animal life, he will have fomething contraded and abjedl in all his hopes. He fees before him an. indiftintt profped of happinefs in corporeal indul- gence, or indolent repofe : he therefore is prompted by inftinft, and direfted even by reafon, to accom- modate himfelf to this defliny of his nature ; and he thinks it folly and delufion to difquiet himfelf about any higher purfuits than thofe in which Eternity feems to be engaged. No views of mental improvement have ever dawned upon his mind ; and he leaves the world, as he entered it, ignorant of all the nobler capacities of his nature, and uninflrucled in the dignity of his being by thofe religious encouragements and affift- ances, which alone could inllruct him. How different is the influence of enlightened re- ligion ! Taught by this, man becomes acquainted with the character of his being. Regarding himfelf no longer as the groveling inhabitant of earth, he extends his hopes beyond the reach of animal en- joyment. He finds himfelf deftined to immortal life ; he feels himfelf endued with the capacity of eternal happinefs. To this fublime end his mind almoft involuntarily endeavours to adapt itfelf. His imagination, his underflanding, his heart, affume new energy and extent, as thev are employed on fo boundlefs a fcene. And while he looks forward to thofe bright profpects which religion unfolds to his O 2 view. 21^ SERMON Ia. view, fentinv-RVs of confcious dignity infinuate thcin- felves into liis ininci, fo as to purify his taite, and ex- alt his defires above the grofs and fleeting pleafures of this terreftrial ftate. It requires no uncommon effort of fagacity to dif- cover the wide difference that fubfifls between the religions of Mahomet and Chrid, in their influence on the conceptions of the imagination, and the direc- tion of the appetites. The dodrines which the Pro- phet of Arabia has taught concerning the divine per- fections, too frequently accord with the lowell ideas of the human mind ; and though they are at times illuminated by fublime or magnificent images, yet ma- ny of the fuppol'ed beauties of the Koran confdt rather in the brilliancy of the language than in the majeily of the thoutrht. How much Mahomet was indebted O to the writings of the Prophets and of the Evange- iifts, for the greater part of what is fublime or beau- tiful in his theology, his compofitions declare : but with this facred and hollowed imagery he blended the impure fuperllitions and grofs conceptions of his countrymen. For the wild profufion and incongru- ous mixture of abfurdity and fenfe which pervade his WTitings, it is fcarcely pollible to account on any oth- er fuppcfition than the natural incapacity, even of the wifefl man, to form upon every fubjeti, and to pre- ferve upon every occafion, juft and confident notions of the divine perfeftions. In what glowing colours is the greatnefs of the De- ity uifplayed almoil in the commencement of the Ko- ran ! and with what zeal doec; the imagination go along with defcriptions, which fecm {o fuited to the fupreme dignity of his nature, and the glorious ex- cellence of his vv'orks ! Yet hardly is this cnthufiafm excited, before all the ardours of the mind are repref- fed, when we find this fublime Being defcend to the meancft and moil conlemptiblc emplo} mcnts ; prc- fcribine P A R T I. 2*3 fcrlbing laws which minifler more to the appelilc^? than to the intercfts of men ; and regulating, with the fame care, at one moment the .order of fecret and impure enjoyment, and in the next the difciple in which men are to be trained for eternity. In the compofition of the fanatical Impoilor, credul- ity is often intermixed with craft. The fervors which are at firil aflumed voluntarily and infiduoufly, return by a kind of mechanical force ; in procefs of time the glow of his fancy, and the tumult of his palFions, are no longer artifical, but real : and in this lalt ftage of depravity combined with folly, the enthiifiaiL is infeparately blended wdtli" the hypocrite in the whole mafs of charafters ; and in the fame aclion we may difcover the wilinefs of the one, and the w^eaknefs of the other. Hence the inconfiilencies. of Mahomet are to be afcribed partly to cunning, in accommo- dating his doctrines to the prejudices of other men ; and partly to fanaticifm, which prevented him from controling the impetuous but uncertain faliies of his own mind. Hence the God of Abraham and of Mofes, tl:c in- comprehenfible Being who, in the language of Ifaiah,, liveth from eternity to eternity, is afibciated with ti'ie grofs and limited attributes of Eaftern idolatry ; and the altar which is erected to the Father of univerfa! nature, is commanded to be approached v/ith the flaV- iili rites of a timorous and abjed fuperifition. Of that Eternity, the reprefentation of which fornis fo great a part of every religion, the ideas which IMahomet has given, are not more^pure or more con- fifient. Oi" fuch a fyftem of opinions, fo perplexevl by iiiconfiftcncy, and fb debafed by impurity, the ef- feci; upon the mind is obvious. Though all meU probably can feel the fublimily of I'lole defcriptions which fometimes occur, yet the imprcflion is momen- tary ; but the apprehenlions which are entertained bf O 3 th. 214 SERMON IX. the Deity from his agency, and the conceptions which are formed of Futurity from its employments, are permanent. The beauties of the Koran may captivate the fancy ; but its errors at once delude the judgment, degrade the fpirit, and pollute the affec- tions. How can the follower of Mahomet, therefore feel any enlargement given to his underflanding, from reprefentations of a Deity who, though fome- times eloquently or magnificently defcribed, is yet familiarized to his apprehenfion in the charafter of an impure or capricious being ? How can he be excited to the exercife or improvement of the higher powers of his nature, by the views which his religion affords him of a Futurity in which tliefe powers feem to be unemployed ; in which the enjoyments of ani- mal pleafure form a great part of the reward affign- ed to virtue ; and to the rehfh of which no other preparation feems neceffary, than to aflimilate the mind to an ambition as limited, and to defires as im- pure ? Though the exiftence of a Deity has been admit- ted as well in the darkefl as the moft enlightened ages ; and though it is equally fupported by the tef- timony of tradition and the authority of reafon ; yet the ideas entertained of his attributes have been much diverfified by various caufes in the conftitution of men's minds, or in the circumftances of their fitua- tion. The northern nations, fierce and unpolilhed in their manners, affailed by the feverities of an incle- ment fky, and habituated to the contemplation of dreary wafles or rugged mountains, have arrayed their deities in every terrible quality. Among the inhabitants of the Eafl, whofe tempers feem to be cafl in a fofter mould, and whofe fenfes are accuf- tomed to more delicate and mere beautiful profpefts of nature, the characters of their Gods wear a love- lier afpeft. The fame propenfity in the worfhippcr to PART I. ^15 to affimllate the objed of his worfhip to his own rul- ing paffions, or his own favourite tenets, may be tra- ced through individuals and feds. The God of the benevolent man is, in his contemplation, furrounded with the mild luftre of benevolence ; the God of the malignant is feen only with frowns of difpleafure, and armed with the thunderbolt of vengeance. In the Deity of Zeno we perceive much of the fullen dignity, and harfh inflexibility, in which the philofo- pher himfelf placed the fupreme good ; and upon the fame principles Epicurus afcribed to his Gods that exemption from the folicitude of care, and the buftie of adtivity, which he reprefented as eflential to hap- pinefs, both human and divine. But in the God whom Chriilians are commanded to adore, none of thofe imperfections can be difcerned, which are ufually and juftly imputed to the peculiar fentim.ents of in- dividuals, or the general habits of nations. Without the jargon of fcience, and without the rant of enthu- fiafm, he is prefented to us with all the perfections which were ever affigned to the Divinity, by the rea- fon of the contemplative philofopher, or the fancy of the enraptured poet. And here it well deferves our notice, that, while the human underftanding has been chiefly employed in invefl:igating the abfolute exifl:ence of God's attributes, divine revelation ufually exhibits them in a relative, and therefore a more intelligible and more interefling point of view. Hs is our Father, by whom, we are proteded ; he is our Counfellor, by v/hom w£ are inftruded in the duties of our ftation ; he is our Judge, by whom we (hall be hereafter exalted to the nobleft enjoyments, or condemned to the moft dread- ful torments. Do not thefe reprefentations of the Deity pafs more eafily into the underftanding, and \york more forcibly on the affedions, than the pro- foundefl refearches of philofophers into the nature O4 . of 2i6 S E R M O 'N IX. of infinity, or the mofl fclid chain of argiimenta- oil the conneclion of caiife and effedi ? Indeed thc'^aticd writers are always more intent on fandifyins; our hearts than on amufing our imagination. Hence they abound with fuch reprefentations of our Crea- tor, as are hkely to produce not tranfient and wiKl admiration, but calm and permanent confidence. Hence, too, the attributes of God are fo frequently and fo pertinently united with the duties of man. In- flead of bewildering us in intricate and abftrufe fpecu- lations upon unity, they tell us that we are to ivo)'- Jhip th: Lord oiir God, and him only ive are to Jer-vc. In- ftead of multiplying curious and difputable diflinc- tlons about the abltracl' effence, and the negative or pofidve properties, of fpiritual and corporeal bcingii, they em.phatically pronounce God to he a ffirit : and to this fpeculative dogma they inftantly affix a prac- tical precept ; for we are therefore to ivorfhip him in fpirit and in triith. Before this audience it v/ould be unnccciT-iry for me to enlarge on the dotilrinc of tutelary deities, which feems to have prevailed in every country, and of Vv'hich numbcrlefs inftanccs are recorded in facred and profane writings. But the uncontroled, the unrivalled, ^nd the undivided pov^'er ; the univerfal prefence, and unceafmg agency of the true God, are again and again alTerted in the fcriptures. He is Al- pha and 0?7!ega, the beginning and the end. He is the Father of light, zvith 'ivhom there is no variabknefs, nei- ther Jloado^u vf turning. He is the creator and ruler of all things, in whom are hidden all the treafures of . ivifdom ; the patient mailer, who is willing that all Jhould come to repentance ; the juil God, who will j-e- ivard every man according to his works ; the gracious and merciful God, who o-ave his only bc<^-otten Son. thai whqfoe-ver hejieveth in him Jhould not perijh, but have ev- crlajiing life. "What,! bef2ech you, can be more con- vincin-r P A R T 1. 217 vinci:\^ to our judgment, or more improving to our hearts^ than thefe prefentations of the Deity ? Do they ny)t invite us to confidence, as well as humble us into fear ? Meditation on fuch a Being, fo con- li.antly and fo wonderfully employed in promoting the good of his creatures, tends furely to crufh every felfilh, and to enlarge every generous affection of the ibul. It exalts the dignity of our nature, when we conceive ourfelvescapableofobtaininghis approbation; it foftcns the heart into compaffion, and expands it in- to benevolence, when we confider mankind as framed, and fupported by the fame Almighty power, redeem- ed by the fame goodnefs, and intended together with ourfelves for the fame glorious and incorruptible in- heritance in hca-jen. The pride of knowledge, the fplendor of conqueft, and the pageantry of pov/er, ihrink into obfcurity and infignificance, when we re- reflecl on him 'luhom the heaven, and heaven of heavens cannot contain. All the lurking impurities of our fouls are feen with loathing, and all the fecret crimes of our lives remembered with horror, while we con- sider that he trieth the very heart and reins, and that his eye feeth afar off. All the dark and tempeftuous fcenes of the world ceafe to alarm and deprefs us, ad- verfity lofes her fting, and profperity affumes new and m.ore delightful charms, when we confider that no event takes place without the appointment of our Maker, that not a fpai-rrpu) falleih to the ground with- out his notice, and that in his fight we are of more value than many fparrozvs. In refpeft to a Future Life, the belief of it has, v.- know, prevailed alinofl; univerfaliy ; and yet, as to the particular kinds and degrees of enjoyment re- ferved for us, nations and individuals have differed widely from each other. The Indian, enfeebled by age or tortured by ficknefs, gladly rcfigns his kircath, in hopes of receiving again the bow by which he had gained 2i8 . S E R M O N IX. gained by his fuftenance, and deflroyed his enemies ; and meeting again the dog who had been the faith- ful companion of his dangers and his tpils. The hardy warrior of the North welcomed the hour of death, which was to carry Ivm into the hall of Odin, where, in his imagination, the ghofts of departed he> roes were permitted to remember and to celebrate the exploits performed on earth, and to quaflF the moft delicious Hquor from the Ikulls of the foes whom they had flain in battle. Virgil defcribes his heroes as engaged in the fame purfuits, and attached to the fame pleafures. which had been long familiarized and endeared to them jn their former exiftcnce.* Mahomet too, as we have feen, in the fenfual para- dife which he announced, prepared for his followers fcenes of the moft alluring voluptuoufnefs. Now, whatever allowance the man of deep reflec- tion may make for the ignorance and fuperftitlon of barbarous countries, and whatever entertainment the man of refined tafte may derive from the compofi- tions of more enlightened writers, both furely will agree in approving the filence of the fcriptures as to. the particular (late of things in a future ffe. Reafon informs us, that the prefent is a probation- ary flate of difcipHne ; and, in conformity to fuch a ftate, religion adapts all her doftrines to faith, all her encouragements to hope, and all her regulations to pradice. Chriftianity holding up to us the profpect of our future exiftence, bids us now prepare for it by virtuous habits of thought and adion ; and philofo- phy will inform us that thofe habits, in a great fcheme of * Pars in gramineis exercent membra palsftris, Contendunt ludo, et fulva luclantur arena : Pars pedibus plaudunt choreas, et carmina dicunt. -Quae gratia currum Armorumque fuit vivis, quse cura nitentes Pafcere equos, eadem fequitur tellure repoftos. ^neid. VI. PART I. 219 of moral government, are neither recommended by the creator, nor acquired by the creature, in vain. We are therefore to beHeve that a real, an intimate, and mod important connection fubfifts betureen the prefent hfe and that which is to follow it ; though it furpafs our abilities to explain, and perhaps to com- prehend, the particular powers with which we fliall be invelled, and the particular agency in which we are to be employed. Chriftianity may then be ex- cufed for not gratifying our curiofity, on fubjeds to which our apprehenfions are now utterly inadequate : and, even were they more adequate, it would de- ferve our praife for informing us of what is true, that we are deftined for immortality ; and for in- ftrufting us in what is mod important, the duties by which we are to gain it. From fome paiTages in the- fcriptures it may be inferred, that our moral purfuits and our intelleftual endowments will bear fome re- femblance to the prefent ; and on this fuppofition is founded the neceffity of regulating the one by the flrldefl virtue, and of im.proving the other by the fublimcft knowledge. In favour of this inference from the facred writings, analogy certainly pleads. Children are poifeffed of powers and affedlons, which are in procefs of time to be drawn out into adion ; upon the right ufe of which depends their happinefs or their mil'ery ; and in the cultivation of which, therefore, they are affifted at a time when they can- not look forward either to the end for which they are to act, or to the connection of that end with the means that are now taking to enable them to aft well. In the fame manner we are training up to habits, and exercifing powers, which are to acquire new vigour, and to operate through a wider fphere, when this corruptible Jhall have put on incorruption. Certain- ly we are not juftihed in expecting that indolent re- pofe, in which an Epicurean would place his feUcity ; or 2 20 S E R % -O N IX. or thofe rapturous and fervent devotions, in which aloiie the Enthufiaft iunpoies the joys of the blefled to confifl : much lefs arc we authorized to look for fenfual gratifications, or the gaudy trappings of wealth and power. The policy or the pride of the Greeks and Remans often induced them to confme the rewards of Eterni- ty to ths few whd acted v/ith fplendor on th5 pubhc theatre of life ; to wife le^;ifiators, to valiant heroes, and mighty conquerors. But the gofpel announces " refurre6lion and judgment, together with the happi- nefs or mifery that is to follow them, to men o? all ages and all countries, of all 'capacities and all (la- tions. It oifers the bright rccompence of a croum that fadcih- not away^ as well to the filent and iblid virtues of mxeeknefs and charity, as to the more fhin- ing and exalted excellences of valour in a juft caufc, and the difmterefled love of our country. It doo.s not confound and weary the underllanding, by xq- prefenting the various ftages of our being • as rcfult- ing from a long train of phyfical caufps, which Qod has appointed, and which aS'ecc each other by fscret but unterrupted ties ; but it exliibi'cs the dcfi.ri;:e of Futurity continually and profefledly in a moral, arid therefore a more ufeful, point of vicv\'. It tells us' that the things which are feen^ and are temporal have a reference to thofe things ivhich are not feen^ and arc. eternal ; and that, in both, the fame glorious defign is uniformly carried on. It conneds what we are to praftifc with what v/e are to believe : and thus ex- tends the influence of Futurity over our focial and religious relations, over our conduct in private and public life, and even over our wonis and thoughts. Such is the effeft of Chriflianity with regard to \^\^ dodrine of a judgment to come : arid as to the happi- nefs which is to fucceed that judgment, it flill holds the fame frm but unadorned langur.ge ; and ftill di- rects P A R T I. 221 rc3:s all its declaraiions to the fame great and good purpt^le, of making us wife unto falvation. Thus we are told that tJjis mortal Jlmll put on i?nmortality\ we are encouraged to hope for r.dmlxlion into the pref- ence of the /pints ofjujt men made f^er fed: ; we are to fee. the ^verlafting God, face to faa\ and know bini even as we are known. hi thefe reprefentations there are iio impure or fantaltic ideas : all is fiinplcj yet majefdc ; all is won- derful, yet credible; all is captivating, and at the fame time inllruftivc. When the aftions of every day and every hour have this intimate connection with our eternal doom, is it not to be expected that religion will have a for- cible and conftant influence over cur hves ? That in- fluence, it muft be confelfed, is often G0untera have filently but uniformly operated upon the private fen- timents of men, fo as to narrow their focial affedions within the bounds of their own perfuafion, and to create enemies in all that are not numbered under the banners of the prophet. While the religion of Mahomet thus naturally tends to divide mankind, whether as individuals or nations, from each other j and while it checks the diifufion of humanity, by re- tarding the improvement and happinefs of human kind ; its effects are not lefs malignant upon the moral charader of man, by the rules and precepts k prefcribes. Of that liberal piety which is founded as well in the underftanding as in the heart ; which examines where it approves, and which difplays the fmcerity of its approbation by reditude of intention and purity of conduft ; the generality of mankind, from their contrafted habits of thought, as well as their laborious ftations in life, are in a great meafure incapable. They indeed believe in a moral govern- or and judge of the univerfe ; they reverence his attributes, and would conciliate his favour ; but it accords better with their wifhes, and their prejudices, to confine the practice of religion to thofe auflerities and forms, which require little mental purity, or in- telleftual exertion, to perform. A religion, there- fore, which avails itfelf of this infirmity, mull necef- farily be fuppofed to give a fanction to thefe natural though dellrudive errors, and to be produdive of all the evils that refult from them. If it be true, as the enemies of revelation contend, that mankind are often not aduated by their princi- ples ; it is equally true, may the Chriftian fay, that they in few inflances totally and deliberO'tely re- nounce PART II. 229 Bounce them. Error gains aflent by the refemblance it bears to truth ; and fuperflition fanftifies its ufur- pations by urging feme of thofe claims, which true religion has ever employed with fuccefs upon the common fenfe of mankind. Hence no religion, be its promifes ever fo alluring, its ceremonies ever fo frequent, and its injunftions ever fo peremptory, can keep any firm hold on the reafon or the imagination of men, unlefs it calls in the aid of the moral fenfe, and recommends fome duties which that fenfe ap- proves. Even the coarfefl and moll defpicable fyf- tems of fuperflition pretend to give a greater or lefs fan£tion to thofe offices which the experience of men found necelTary for the happinefs of that fociety in vv^hich they arofe ; and therefore the diftin^lion which lies between true and falfe religion, is this : That reHgion is falfe, which, profefling to be intended for the ufe of all nations, is diftorted in its dodlrines, and narrowed in its precepts, by the prejudices and manners of any one particular age, and any one par- ticular country. That religion is probably true, which, challenging the inquiries, and demanding the obedience, of every age and every country, is calcu- lated to promote their tem.poral as well as eternal interefl ; to co-operate with every ufefui quality in their government, lav/s, and manners ; and gradual- ly to correft whatever is defective or injurious to them. But the general and vague recommendation of virtue forms no part of the peculia?- charaj^er of ayiy religion, fince it is equally common to ail. The intiuence of a religion upon morality is therefore to be determined by the relation which the peculiar duties it prefcribes, have to the general welfare of men; and the motives which of itfelf it afibrds to the difcharge of thofe grand and univerfal duties.^ which time and place may indeed modify in their degree, but without fui'pending their obligatioj^^^ P 3 Confidered 23© SERMON IX. Confidered in this light, the religion of Mahomet prefents itfelf to us, as containing precepts more de- ftruftive, perhaps, to the well being of mankind, than are to be found in any other inftance of religious de- lufion. The Muflulman is commanded, indeed, to be juft and charitable ; and this command every other religion, however falfe, would not fail to impofe. But juftice and charity form only a fmall and fubor- dinate part of his obedience. He mufl: abflain from the innocent enjoyment of the bounties of nature, with a rigour v/hich leflens the comforts of focial in- tercourfe, and even in fome degree repreffes the noble emotions of friendfhip and affection. He muft ap- proach the Deity, not at the feafons of his own grati- tude ; but at prefcribed hours, which often arrive without the preparation of his heart ; and which re- turn with fuch frequency, and muft be pradifed with fuch exaclnefs, as tend furely to create cftentatious hypocrify, or abjed pufillanimity j to fiackcn punc- tuality into indifference, or inflame zeal into ianati- cifm. In whatever fituation he is placed, he mult perform ablutions, which often interfere with the practical duties of life ; and of which the forms and circumftances would be ridiculous in the recital, if indeed they deferved not g^feverer appellation, when confidered as the evidences of virtue and piety. To fill up the meafure of his devotion, the Mahometan mull leave his friends, his family, and his country, and expofe himfelf to the dangers of a tedious jour- ney, through barren fands and beneath a burning fky, to vifit the Temple of Mecca, vvith ceremonies v/hich alike corrupt the underilanding, and degrade the dig- nity, of a rational and immortal being. Such are the duties to which the foliov;ers of Ma- homet are bound ; and little mud the prophet have known of the human heart, if he imagined that the prefcription of fuch a ritual was ferviceable to the caufe PART 11. ^31 caufe of real piety ; if he believed that by the intro- dudion of burthenfome ceremonies he infured the fincerity of rehgion ; or if he ventured to hope that any other confequence could arife from fuch precepts, than the obfervance of the forms of devotion without "its fpirit ; and the confinement of the emotions of virtue to that precife limit within which they were circumfcribed. But let us turn our eyes awhile from a profped fo difgufting. To the narrow and felfifli views of the Arabian im- poftor, and to the lifelefs and unprofitable ceromonies which he appointed, let us oppofc the fublime and difmterefled philanthropy of our holy religion, the Simplicity of its precepts, and the connexion even of its ceremonial ordinances with the practice of moral virtue. Unlike the confined and narrow inftitutions of the Koran, the gofpel of Chriit breathes a fpirit of benevolence as univerfal as it is pure. Unconnefted. with the machinations of human policy, or the fchemes of human ambition, it propofes to eflabhfh no other kingdom but that of righteoufnefs and p ^ace. No reftriftions of national prejudices, no differences of religious opinion or modes of worfhip, are fuffered to reftrain its operation. The believer and the infi- del, the friend and the enemy, are, by a peculiarity which diflinguifhes Chriflianity from every other re- ligion, equally entitled to our good offices and our prayers. In vain, therefore, will the faithful Muflul- man, the Roman patriot, or the Grecian moralift, contrafl their favourite virtues with that enlarged and comprehcnfive charity, which embraces the whole race of men, and knows no bounds but thofe v>:hich God has prefcribed to his creation. In the delight- ful cxcrcife of thefe tranfcendent virtues, extended ' and exalted as they arc by the religion of Jcfus, the pious Chriftian finds no obflruQj.on from, the obferv- P 4 snce 233 S E R M O N IX. ance of ceremonies devoid of ufe, and even of mean- ing. He 15 indeed direfted to keep two ordinances, one of which is the mark of his admilTion into the faith, the other of his continuance in it, yet to neither of them, when unconneded with moral condu6l, does the gofpel afcribe either dignity or ufe. Both, on the contrary, involve a folemn promife of obedience to that law, which, as it v^'as originally imprefled by the Almighty on the heart of man, fo has it been fmce finally ratified and illuflratcd by the revelation of Chrift. If fuch is the faith which we profefs ; if it pro- motes every fecial virtue in an extent unknov/n, not only to the Mahometan, but even to every other re- ligious fyftem ; if its ceremonies are fev/ and eafy, and thofe equally produdlive of the fear of God and the love of our fellow creatures ; if it binds together, in the moft powerful manner, the intereft of mankind with the duties of religion ; fhall we hefitate a mo- ment to confefs it a fyftem every way worthy of the infinite wifdom which formed it ; a fvflem which, if adhered to with zeal and fmcerity, would reconcile the views, and calm the animofities, which fubfifl in the world ; would unite all mankind as partners in one common inhered, and teach them to reil their hopes of eternal happinefs in the next life on the practice of piety and moral r£6:itude in the prefent ? Such are the influences v.hich Mahometanifm 2nd Chriflianity feverally have upon the human char- acter ; and fuch the difference which thev v/ould of themfelves naturally produce in the appearance of our temporal aflairs, and the exertions of our moral pow- ers. But though this diverfity of operation be cb- vicus, it is neceliary to remark' that this operation may not always be equally prominent, or equally in- tenfe ; that other concurrent and collateral caufes may fis v/eil limit the tendency of the religion of Chrilt, PART II. 233 ChriR", as diminini the influence of Mahometan fu- perllition. Religion, it is apparent, is not the only employment of the mind of man ; a variety ot other caufes, in government, in climate, and manners, are conftantly acting upon his powers, and falhioning his character : and though a pure and fubhme reli- gion has an evident and real tendency to exalt the capacities of his mind ; yet a religion the moft pure and fublime' may exift with a form of government fo corrupt, or with a fyftem of m.anners fo depraved, as to lofe a great part of its influence on the human mind. There are probably circumftances in the con- llitution of European and Afiatic governments, and flill more, it has been faid, in the different influences of their climate and fituation, which prevent the re- ligions by which they are diflinguiflied from produc- ing their full and natural effects upon the aftions of thofe who have embraced them : and if fpeculations of this kind were the proper fubjeds of this place, it might not perhaps be difficult to fliew, what are the caufes which in one fituation have prevented the ra- tional and exalted theology of Chrift from attaining its proper effeft upon the charader of thofe who have adopted it as a rule of faith and conduct ; and which on the other hand have refcued, in part, the difciples of Mahomet from the fatal influences of his doc- trmes. But it is fuilicient for me to have fhewn the different tendency which thefe religions have, from their intrinfic and dftinguifhing properties, to af- fed: our moral agency : and fmce every caufe muft be judged of by its proper effeds, enough, I trufl, has been advanced to prove, that the one is naturally beneficial, and the other as naturally hurtful, to the intelleftual, the fecial, and the religious chara(5ter of man. From a (hort review of the fubjeds that have been difculled, and of the arguments that have been ad. duced. S34 S E R M O N IX. duced, in the courfe of thefe Lectures, the fuperiori- ty of the rehgion taught by Chrifl over that of Ma- homet, will be fufficientiy apparent to juftify our ap- probation of the one, and our rejedion of the other. We firll endeavoured to flievv, that, as the Mahome- tan impofture was indebted for its fuccefs to caufes vifibly and merely human, fo the rapid propagation of Chriftianity is to be referred chiefiy to the imme- diate interpofition of God ; that the extent of a re- ligion is not fmiply, and independently of circum- flances, a proof of its truth ; and that, upon the ex- clufion of this moft necelTary diftindion, idolatry and heathenifm may boaft of higher triumphs over Ma- hometanifm, than Mahometanifm itfelf can,* from the number of its adherents and the wide difiufipn of its doftrines, claim over Chriftianity. When the character of Mahomet was compared With the charafter of Chrift, the contrail v^as moil ftriking. In the pretended Prophet of Arabia we difcovered, under the mallv of religious zeal, the combined vic(?s of lull, cruelty, and worldly ambi- tion in his motives, and of v/orldiy craft in his mea- fures. But in the bleffed redeemer of mankind we contemplated, with reverential love and gratitude, the moil enlarged philanthropy united with the moll fubhme devotion ; a dignity tempered by meeknefs, and a humility quite remote from meannefs ; a con- fiftency, which no variety of fituation could fliake ; a difmtereftednefs, which no temptations of fecular glory could feduce ; a fortitude, calm without in- fenfibiUty, exemplary without oflentation, and equal- ly fuperior to the afRidionsi of life, and to the tor- tures of death* Mahometanifm, • It has been faid that, if we divide the known regions of the world inlo thirty equal parts, the Chriftiaiis will be found to be in poffeffion of five, the Mahometans of Hi, and the Idolaters of nineteen, — See Brtrtiis-.i, p. 79. PART II. z^s Mahometanifm, we have feen, is totally unfupported by external evidence ; while the credibility of the gofpel is attefled by miracles, which omnipotence alone could have performed ; and by the prediftion of events, which omnifcience alone could have fore- feen. We have found that the Koran even refutes its own claim to a divine authority, as well by what it denies as by what it concedes ; that, confidered in the light of a revelation to regulate our condud, and to con- firm our hopes, it was altogether unneceflary ; that it is true fo far only as it adopted the doftrines of a preceding religion, and that where it differs from them it is grofsly improbable, or evidently falfe ; in fnort, that in many inftances it is unworthy of the wifdom, and in fome even irreconcileable to the good- nefs, of God. To errors which our reafon may de- teift, and to deformities w^hich our common fenfe re- coils, we oppofed the purity and fimplicity of the gof- pel ; its confidence with the bed difcoveries of phi- iofophy, and the immutable laws of nature ; its con- formity to the moral precepts and peculiar ceconomy of the Mofaic fyftem ; and, finally, the invariable a- greement in which its commands, its fanftions, and its evidences (land with each other, and with them- felves. In the prefent Lefture the comparifon has been clofed by an impartial confideration of the effeds which each religion either is calculated to produce, or adually has produced ; effeds v/hich, on the one fide, are as dcflruftive to the pretenfions of Mahom- etanifm, as on the other they are honourable to the caufe of Chriftianity. Indeed, the more attentively we confider the impofture of Mahomet, the more f.rmly fhall we difbelieve, and the more fmcerely mufl v/e defpife it. But in proportion as the proofs which fupport the gofpel, and the doctrines which it con- veys, 2338 S E R M O Ni X. been found Infcparable from Polytheifm, they adore^ as the attributes of their gods, the weaknefles and paflions which deform and difgrace human nature ; and their worfliip is in many refpe£ls not unworthy of the deities who arc the objedls of it. The favour of beings which have no exiltence but in the imagi- nation of the fuperftitious enthufiafl, is concihated by fenfelefs ceremonies and unreafonable mortifica- tions ; by ceremonies which confume the tiitie which fhould be dedicated to the a<5live and focial duties ; and by mortifications which flrike at the root of ev- ery lawful and innocent enjoyment. What indeed fhall we think of a rehgion, which fuppofes the ex- piation of fms to confift in penances, than which fan- cy cannot fugged any thing more rigorous and ab- furd ; in fitting or (landing whole years in one un- varied pollure ; in carrying the hcaviefl loads, or dragging the mod weighty chains ; in expofmg the naked body to the fcorching fun ; and in hanging with the head downward before the fiercelt and molt intolerable fire ? . But it were endlefs to dwell on all their fiiperfli. tious rites. The following, which has been fi-equent- ly confirmed to us without prejudice and without de- lign, is alone fufficient to awaken every tender feel- ing of our hearts, and to incite us to the exertion of every effort which may tend to wean the minds of this unenlightened people from praftices fo inlpious and inhuman. It will eafily be imagined that I al- lude to that mod cruel cuflom, bv which the wife of the Gentoo is induced to burn herfelf on the pile which confumes the allies of her hufband ; a cuftom, if not abfolutely enjoined by her religion, yet at leaft fo far recommended by it, as to render the breach of it, in fome cafes, fubjeft to the utmoft ignominy and deteflation. The facts which I have recited., as well as many others SERMON X. 259 others of equal importance, are too well known to be deni(?d. From thefe alone every human heart will at once inter the neceflity of endeavouring to fublli- tute the pure and rational religion of Jefus in the place of a creed fo fliocking to our reafon, and to our fmer fenfibilities. Happily, however, there are circumflances which feem favourable to fuch an attempt : for that natu- ral fagacity which is the national charafteriftic of the Gentoos, the auitere and abfl'emious life v/hich they lead, the gentlenefs and ferenity of their temper, their belief of a future ftate, and the idea of one fupreme God, Vv'hich mixes even with the worfliip of their fubordinate deities ; all feem to afford a rational ground for us to expeft their converfion. But in what manner muft we proceed in this in- terefling and moft arduous projedl ? Have not: fchemes of religious reformation been planned with plaufible appearances in all ages ; and in all have they not been foiled by real and ftubborn dif- ficulties ? Are not the moil approved reafonings, and the moft glowing eloquence, defeated by igno- rance or obftinacy in thofe ^^vho are to be taught ? Has not the indifcretion or raflmefs of the teacher, in too many inilances, entirely counteracted his be- nevolence, however fnicere ; and his aftivity, how- ever unwearied ? — Let us not be difccuraged, bv thefe general complaints, from taking a large and ex- ad view of the particular queftion v/e are novv' called upon to examine. The awfpl fubjecls of religion are to be treated differently in different circumftances. Some there are, whofe minds are enlightened by fcience, enlarg- ed by long and extenfive intercourfe with the world, and invigotated by habits of profound and intenfe meditation : the faith of fuch men v;ili be unfl^aken, and their devotion will be ardent ; not from the aid R 2 of aCo S E R IM O N X. of external forms, but by filent and fecret adoratlorv of the Deity, and by deep reflettion upon the moft extenfive and abflra£ted truths of rehgion, both na- tural and revealed. But it would be vifionary and dangerous to expedt thd fame beneficial efl'ecls among perfons of talents lefs cultivated, and of views lefs ex- tenfive. Experience tells us, that with the bulk of mankind fome caution is necelfary in the feledion of topics adapted to their apprehenfion 5 and that much fagaclty mufl be employed in the ufe of all thofe colla- teral and external expedients which are to awaken their attention ; and to dired it, when awakened, to proper objects. When therefore Chrillianity is at- tempted to be propagated among the inhabitants of the Eaft, the attention of thofe to whom we preach it, mull be confined to dodrines fyfhematically inculcat- ed, and to a ritual punctually abferved. We mud not leave the great truths of falvation fluctuating with wild uncertainty in the minds of thofe who em- brace them. To underftandings which have recent- ly emerged from the groffeft fuperftition, v/e muft not commit the talk of appointing for themfel-ves the modes of conciliating^ the divine favour bv humble fuppiication and fervent thankfgiving. There is fomething attractive, we know, in the regularity and decency of prefcribed forms ; there is fomething high- ly inftruftive and perfuafive in the plainnefs and pre- cifion of dodrines methodically propofed to the un- derilanding. But in the ?nanner of preparing thefe doctrines and thefe forms lies the chief difFiculty we have to contend with : and it mufl be confefl'ed that Chriflian churches have often brought difgrace upon the general caufe of Chrillianity, by an extravagant and undiflinguifhing attachment to their own pecul- iar tenets and favourite ceremonies. They have fup- pofed the followers of other fyflems equally able to comprehend what habit ha? familiarized, and equally difpofed S E R M O N X. 261 difpofed to adopt what convidion has endeared, to themfelves. The eiforts of miflionaries, whom the policy or the zeal of the Romiih church may have hitherto em- ployed, have fometimes incurred the contempt of the Infidel, and fometimes provoked the indignation of the Philofopher. They have been marked rather by eagernefs to multiply converts, than by ability to pro- mote the real happincfs of thofe that were converted. They appear to have fubllituted one fpecies of fuper- flition for another ; to have darkened the under- ilanding with error ; and to have poifoned the heart with bigotry. But the advocates of found and rational Chriflian- ity will not be expofed to thefe formidable imputa- tions. "Whatever fpecious and refined fpeculations may fugged, upon the natural pliancy of the human mind in receivincr, and on its natural firmnefs in re- taining, religious imprelTions, experience is our fafeft guide in dealing with the mafs of mankind, who arc prone to run into the mofl oppofite extremes ; to be fometimes fickle, and fometimes obftinate ; fluggifli in one moment, andin the next precipitate. Our reg- ulations muft, therefore, be adapted to the real ivcak- neffes as well as capacities of thofe whom we would inllrud. Some fpecific doflrines, as I before obferv- ed, muft be taught, and fome particular ceremonies muft be recommended : we muft interefl the imagina- tion, vv^hilft we convince the judgment. But the taik, arduous as it is, may be properly and effedually per- formed by a ftritl adherence to the genuine and cha- rafteriftic principles of Proteftantifrn. The leading, the alfeniial, the moft indubitable and the moft im- portant doctrines of Chriftianity muft be propofed to the eaftern nations, expreffcd in the cleareft language, and fupported by the moft luminous arguments.. When the errors and prejudices of thofe whom we ir^ R3 , ftrucl 262 S E R M O N X. ftrufl: are In fome meafure fubdued, and when their minds have been gradually prepared for a fuller de- lineation of evangelical truth, we may tfjcn, and then only, venture to propofe thofe doctrines which are ot a more myfterioifs and recondite nature. We mud difclofe them gradually, and with a fpirit of the moll enlarged toleration, to thofe perfons, whofe fcruples cannot be entirely vanquiflied, and whofe errors can- not be nt cncc removed. In overcoming the rooted and favourite prepoffef- fions of the Gentoos and Mahometans, there doubt- lefs will be room for the moil accurate difcrimination, and for the nicefl delicacy ; their ignorance mud be treated with tendernefs, and their well-meanf though miltaken piety will demand fome portion even of rev- erence. Every truth we communicate, mud be af- iifled and recommended by the method in which it is to be communicated. It mull carry along with it the brightell and mod unequivocal evidence, not only of the firm conviftion it has imprefled upon the judg- ment of the teacher, but of the amiable effe6ls which it has wrought upon his temper, his adtions, and his words. .... . . I would have it underflood, that no artifice, howev- er plaufible ; no force, however indireft, fhould be employed by protellant miflionaries ; and that my wifh is rather to have Chriltianity taught as a true revelation, than to fee it ellabliflicd fuddenly upon the ruins of any falfe religion, which may have for- merly prevailed. By thefc means we fhall obtain all the advantages, which the Romans enjoyed, by tol- erating the cullomary worlhip and ancient theology of the nations whom they governed ; and furcly, from the fuperior excellence of the doctrines which we en- deavour to difierainate, and by which we profefs to be ourfelves direfled, v;e fhall fl-and a f^iirer chance' of making converts, than a heathen miHionary ; and Ihall S E R M O N X. 263 iliall derive greater benefits from thofe who are con- verted, than paganifm could confer on its fincerefl and warmell votaries. Similarity in religious perfufions certainly enlarges the fphere of focial intercourfe ; facilitates the pro- grefs of civilization ; and invigorates the operations of lawful government. This fimilarity it will be in our power to effe£l in fome degree by judicious and temperate meafures, in fupporting the claims of Chrif- tianity over the popular fyltems of belief that are now approved in the Eaft. Let it, however, not be faid, that tenets fo oppofite to each other cannot be taught with propriety, or even with fafety in the fame coun- try. Experience informs us that a Mahometan can obey the fame laws, and purfue the fame civil em- ployments with the Gentoo : and doubtlefs, what is adually pra6lifed by the profeilbrs of opinions fo ro- mantic and difcordant, may be yet more prafticable under the mild and aufpicious influence of the gofpcL The energies of a firm and watchful government will reprefs the furious fallies of zeal ; will proteQ: all par- ties indifcriminately in their adherence to what they conceive to be truth ; and at the fam.e time will gradually prepare their minds for an impartial and fe- rious difcufllon of fuch evidence, as may be brought to fupport the religion which really and folely is the true. To the fcheme here propofed, there, doubtlefs, is an objedion which a groveling and fordid fpirit of covetoufnefs is too apt to cherifli. " At prefent, ir may be laid, the credulous Mahometan, andfuperfti- tious Gentoo, are unafpiring in their views, and tract- able in their difpofitions. Their opinions do not dif- turb our tranquility, and their ceremonies only pro- voke our contempt. But if they fiiould hereafter fee the fallacy of the one, and the abfurdity of the other : if they lliould catch the manly and adive fpirit which. R4 diilinguilh. es 264 S E R INI O N X. diftinguifiies the inhabitants of ChriRian countries : if the bolder exercife of their intellectual faculties fliould beget a jufler fenfe of their civil and political rights, what may be the effects of fuch a revolution upon us ? Actuated by nobler feelings than they have hitherto experienced, they will quickly exchange con- fidence for diftruft, and fubmilTion for refiftance. They will compel us, in our turn, to drag the yoke of fervitude ; or they will drive us from their fhores as a race of merci lei's ruffians, and infatiable plunder- ers." Now on the broad and folid principles of philan- thropy and revelation, 1 fee nothing in this popular objedion which ought to fliake our conviction, or to ilacken our adivity. A religion which enlivens the induftry, and animates the courage of thofe who pro- fefs it ; which awakens in them a more correct ^nd more exquifite fenfe of their duties as men, and their importance as citizens ; fuch a rehgion, I fay, carries with it many bright proofs of its utility and its truth. May we not then expect that the Philofopher will view the fcheme I am propofmg with fixed approba- tion, and that the Chriftian will embrace it with ar- dent fondnefs ? However we may attempt to varnilli over the fadt, the fpirit of commerce will often feize, and often cre- ates opportunities of rapacity ; and in regions very diftant from the feat of empire, where the directions of law are frequently indiftinft, and the redraints of Ihame are always feeble, the iron fcourge of oppref- fion v/ill fometimes be lifted up againfb unprotected innocence, and confpicuous merit j againll ignorance which cannot afcertain its privileges, and weaknefs which cannot affert them. But furcly no plan of commerce can be lafling, and upon the whole advan- tageous ; no form ©f government can he venerable or defenfible ; which ejicludcs mutual truft, an.d does not SERMON X. 2^5 not provide for the mutual benefit of both parties, who are concerned with the one or fubje<^ to the other. On the contrary, if we communicate the arts, the laws, and the religion of Europe to Eaflern na- tions ; if we fliew them by our works, as well as by our words, that we are the difciples of Jefus ; if we . labour both for their fpiritual and their temporal welfare ; there can be no reafon to doubt of an ulti- mate and an adequate reward. They to whom we have given fo fure an earned of our fincerity and of our benevolence, will no longer view us with cold- nefs as ftrangers, or with fufpicion as foes. They will treat us, becaufe they are themfelvcs treated, as fellow citizens and fellow Chriftians ; they will fliare with us in the common danger, and toil with us for the common interefts ; becaufe they will confider themfelves as partakers of the fame blefTmgs here, and heirs of the fame promifes hereafter. Such meafures it is true, may prevent individuals from amaffing exhorbitant wealth, from revelling in luxurious voluptuoufnefs, and from grafping at enor- ^ mous dominion. But fuch meafures, even if they tend to the removal of thefe outrageous evils alone^ are not unworthy of our regard ; and they deferve a yet larger fhare of our attention, if, in confequence of our honed and ftrenuous endeavours to execute them, the general harmony of the Europeans and Orientals vv'ould be more eifeftually fecured, and the general hanpinefs of both promoted more fuccefsful- Zealous in the recommendation of this purpofe, I regard not the cold miftaken policy of fome, who would feparate our religious from our civil interefts. This country has ever boafted with equal pride and jufticethe purity of its worfliip,and the excellence of its government. The fame happy ssra gave birth to each : out of the afnes of defpctifm and fuperftition the 266 S E R M O N X. they both arofe ; and if they fall they will fall togeth- er. Narrow, therefore, and falfe is that philanthro- py, which pretends to be folicitoiis for the rights and liberties of mankind, while for their eternal welfare it employs no meafures, and even profefiedly feels no concern. In what better purpofe can a wife and virtuous na- tion be employed, than in propagating its religion, wherefoever its laws are obeyed ? If it feeks to pro- tect, and not to impoverilh ; if it defircs to govern and not enflave, it will be equallv intent to diffufe among its fubjeds the rights of freedom, and the privileges of Chriftianity. And at what period in the hiflorv of our empire could this attempt be made, with a more favourable profpect of fuccefs than at prefent ? The extreme im- portance of Indian wealth to our commerce, and the growing connexion between the principles of that commerce, and of the government which is to pro- teft it, have awakened the attention of the legifiature to fubjecls equally extenrr/e and iiiterefting. The code which directs the belief and influences the ac- tions of the Hindoos, has been lately tranflated into^ the vernacular language, and fubmitted to the in- fpeftion of public curiofity. Hence we are enabled to trace the long and clofe conneci;ion that fubfifts between the religious and civil laws pf the Hindoos. We can difcern what errors are almofl impregnable to argument, and what may be overcome by cautious and well directed oppofition. We fee in their full, magnitude the futility of their traditions, and the ab- iurdity of their ceremonies. We can mark the flow and imperfect progrefs of civilization and fcience ; and fliould therefore be careful to make their future progrefs in religious knowledge keep a due propor- ,tion to thofe improvements, in the attainment of whicli we are preparing to aflill them in focial life. We S E R M O N X. 267 We cannot indeed fo far adopt the policy of the Ro- mans as to naturalize* any part of their mythology, becaufe all the parts of it are in all refpeds incompati- ble with our own religion. But we may gradually leffen their reverence for their facred records, by ex- ercifmg their faith on other more undoubted interpo- fitions of the Deity. When European cuftoms have been in fome degree introduced among the Hindoos, we fliall find them lefs foHcitous for the obfervance of Eaftern ceremonies. When European fcience has dawned upon their minds, we may fee them lefs tena- cious of their old opinions. The aufpicious effects of our laws will create fome kind of prejudice in favour of our religion ; and when they find it fo perfectly exempt from the fanguinary and intolerant fpirit of Maliometanifm, they may by degrees be brought to liften to the evidences by which it is fupported, and the fanftions by which it is enforced. For incorpo- rating their laws with our own, we have formed a plan, the completion of which is likely to do honour to our national policy and national magnanimi- ty. Yet if we mean only to exempt the inhabit- ants of the Eaft from temporary inconvenience and opprefTion ; if we do not intend to exalt them gradually in the fcale of fecial creatures ; if we exert no endeavours for enlarging the fphere of their future fpeculation and moral improvement, we fhall leave the work fhamefully imperfedl : and fubftitute, I fear, felfiili cunning for genuine and enlarged wif- dom. It would, indeed, be a refined fpecies of mock- ery to hold out the bleffmgs of a free and equitable government, to thofe who are too ignorant to un- derftand, and too languid to enjoy them. Such is the favourable pofture of affairs in the Ealt, and fuch the affiftance which our political fyf- tems may there give to the propagation of religious truth. * Sec Halhed's Preface to the Code of Gentoo Laws. 268 SERMON X. truth. If we turn our eyes towards ourfelves, we •fhall perceive many ftriking difcriminations of the prefent age, which, under judicious direftion, rnay not be diiadvantageous to the caufe of Chrillianity. A fpirit of adventure is gone forth among us ; a fpir- it of experiment : it has infected our philofophy, our religion, and our politics. It has perplexed vulgar minds in the mazes pf error and abfurdity, and hur- ried away men of the brigheft faculties into the dan- gerous extremes of fubtlety and refinement. Let us apply this rellleis principle to a labour of more general importance, and more obvious utility : let us prefent a nobler fcheme for its contemplation, and a worthier object for its exertions. No longer bufied in fruitlefs proje6ls, and groundlefs theories, let lis apply it, where it will be attended with practical advantaore, in convertin^r and enliQ-htcnin^H<5>'^^^}^. 152, 153.] The elaborate work of Ire- nasus experienced a better fate. It is a melancholy S monument 17 NOTES: monument of the perverfenefs of the human under- Handing, when it fufi'ers itfelf to be deluded by nov- chies, and, inllead of following the for?n of found words delivered in the holy fcriptures, proudly pur- fucs its own inventions with only fancy for its guide. But the early prevalence of error, fo far from dimin- jfhing the credit of the gofpel, tends rather to eftab- lilh its authority ; as it confirms the predictions of that divine oracle by whom it was delivered to the world. P. 35. I. 23. It appears thcn^as tv ell from experience that error often docs^ hc.~\ Errors mull arife as long as men are free. Nor do they only arife from the moral cpnftitution of free agents, but from the par- ticular defignation of divine providence. God makes ufe of evil inftruments to effe^^l a good purpofe. He puts fuch reftraints on wicked and erroneous men ; fo over rules their condudl, fo counteracts and checks their proceedings, that they may not infringe on the itanding laws of his kingdom, and derange the gene- ral plan of his providence. As individuals they are criminal ; but, confidered in a more extenfive light, their conduct is ultimately beneficial. We find that errors were permitted under the Mofaic inilitution, for the fame reafon that the ApoHle alleges for their permiffion under the Chriliiian. Compare Deut. xiii. I, &c. with I Cor. ii. 19. P. 38. 1. 14. Among the bijhops, Bcc] The want e- ven of a knowledge of the common rudiments of hte- rature was fo general amonir the hio-her ecclefiallics of thofc times, that it was fcarcely deemed difgraceful to acknowledge it. In the atts of the councils of Ephefus and Chalcedon, many examples occur, where fubfcriptions are to be found in this form : /, fucb a oncy have fubfcribcd by the band of fuch a oie, be- caufe I cannot ivritc^ And, Such a bijhop halving f aid- that NOTES. V that he could not ivrite, I, whofc name is underwritten, /^ave /uh/cribed for hi?n. P. 40. I. 1 6c The 'very e (fence of Chrifi'ianity was loft, hz.~\ No reprefentation can convey ftronger ideas of the mehncholy ftate of religion in the fcventh centu- ry, than the defcription of the character of a good ChrilUan as drawn at that period by St. Eligius, or Eloi, bifhop of Noyon. " Bonus Chrifdanus eft qui ad ecclefiam frequen- ter venit, et oblationem, quae in altari Deo offeratur, exhibet ; qui de fruftibus fuis non guftat, nifi prius Deo ahquid offerat ; qui queries fanctas folennitates adveniunt, ante dies plures caftitateiti etiam cum pro- pria uxore cuftodit^ ut fecura confcientia Domini al- tare accedere poflit ; qui poftremo fymbolum, vel orationem dominicam memoriter tenet. Redimite animas veftras de poena dum habet's in poteftate re- media ; oblationes et decimas ecclefiis afferte ; lu- minaria fandis locis, juxta quod habetis, exhibete ^ ad ecclefiam quoque frequentius convenite ; fanfto- rum patrocinia humilitcr expetite : quod '^\ obferva- veritis, fecuri in die judicii ante tribunal se^'erni judi- cis venientes, dicetis, Da, Domine, quia dedimus.'' Mofj. 'vol. ii. p. 11. P. 41. 1. 2. E'ven the fancied remains of that crofs.~\ A veneration for the crofs very early poifeffed the minds of the primitive ChriHiians, and v/as afterwards carried into all the extremes of ybfurd and puerile fuperftition. Its allegorical reference was magnified into a real virtue : and what the apoftles fpoke of under the form of a metaphorical fymbol became in lime an objeQ: of devotion, and was made ufe of as an aflual charm. Ibid. 1. 4. The images cf the faints ivho had labour- ed to di//'emi7iate~\ The earlier Chriftians reprobated every fpecies of image worfliip in the ftrongcft lan- guage ; and fome of them employed the force of S 2 ridicule VI N O T i! S. ridicule to great advantage, in order to expofe its ab- furdity. When the Emprefs Conftantia defned Eu- febius to fend her the image of Jefus Chrill, he ex- poflulated with her on the impropriety and abfurdity of her requifition in the following very ftriking words : " What kind of image of Chrift does your imperial Majefty wifli to have conveyed to you ? Is it the image of his real and immutable nature ; or is it that which he afiumed for our fakes, when he was veiled in the form of a fervant ? With refpeft to the former, I prefume you are not to learn, that no man hath known the Son, but the Father ; neither hath any man known the Father, but the Son ; and he to whomfoever the Son will reveal him. But you afk for the image of Chriil when he appeared in human form, clothed in a body fimilar to our own. Let me inform you, that the body is now blended with the glory of the Deity j and all that was mortal in it, is abforbed in life." P. 43. 1. 21. /;f of courfe admitted an almojl endlefs 'uariety of religious opinions.~] Vide Shareftani apud iPoc. Specim. Hill. Arabum, p. 136. P. 43. 1. 27. Many of them efcaped hither, as to a ■place of refuge from the dreadful calamities which the jufl vengeance of God inficled on their nation.~] Vide JMillii Differ t. de Mohammedifmo ante Mohamme- dem, p. 43. Ibid. 1.33. ThatfcB which was di/iinguijhed by the title of Jacobites. ~\ The Jacobites took their denomi- nation from one Jacob, a Syrian, who began to dif- feminate his dodrines in the Eaft about the clofe of the fixth century. His fed are fometimes diftinguifh- ed by the name of Monophyfites, the progeny of the Eutychians, who afferted the fingle nature of Chrift, in oppcfition to the orthodox, who maintained that his nature was twofold, human and divine. The Neftorians, in avoiding this error, ran into the con- trary NOTES. n\ trary extreme. In order to fupport his twofold na- ture, they alfo divided the per/on of Chrifl into two. The Athanafians guard their creed againfl both thefi^ errors, by maintaining that Chrifl; is in nature two, but in perfon one ; and illufl:rate the union by that of the foul and body in the human confl:itution. The plea of difficuUy, and even incomprehenfibility, may be urged in one cafe as well as in another. The dif- ficulty in the former is greater, becaufe the fubje^Sl is of a higher degree. But if man is a, myftery to man, can lue hy fc arching find out God? Ibid. 1. 2)7' Idolatry. ~\ For a full and particular ac- count of the various objeds which fhared the devo- tions of the idolatrous Arabs, fee Poc. Spec. p. 89, &c. Sale's Prelim. Difc. edit. 4to. p. 17. Hottin- ger, Hifl:. Orient, p. 228, &c. P. 44. 1. I. The predominant /pedes, appears to have been that of the Sabians'] See Poc. Spec. p. 138 — 143, 'Sale's Prelim. Difc. p. 14. Thofe who are defirous of obtaining a more exaft knowledge of the Sabian principles and worfhip, may confult Hyde, Rel. vet. rerf. p. 128. D'Herbelot, Bibl. p. 726. Hettinger, Hifl;. Oriental, lib. i. cap. viii. Prideaux's Conned, part i. book iii. Ibid. 1. I o. X^^^ religion of the Magi had likezuife found its ipciy^ and ohiained an ejlahlifhmcnt among fome of their- trlbes.~\ See Poc. Spec. p. 146. Every im- portant particular concerning this religion has been, eiabcrately invefl;igated, and clearly explained, by the learned Hyde in his Rel. vet, Perf. and alfo by ^rideaux. Connect, part i. book iv. Ibid. 1. 37. With, the few he nmintained the inf pi- ration of Mofcs.'] Sale's Koran, p. 407. edit. 4to. P. 45. 1.2. IVith the Chrijiian he admitted the di- vms miff on of Jefus Chrijl, and the truth of the gofpel.J Koran, p. 30. 2,5' 41- Reland. de Releg. Moham. hb. \, cap. iv. Elmacin, Hifl:. Sarac. p. 3. Vlll NOTE S. Ibid. 1. 4. He even attempted to found bis own pre- tenfions on the preceding revelations of Mofes and Chrijf\ Koran, p. 174. 133. 449- Ibid. 1. 7. That he %uas fent to purify a religion, ivhich originally came down from heaven \ Vide Millii Differt. de Molyammediimo, &c. p. 5, 6. Ibid. 1. II. To clofe the feal of prophecy'] Vide Hot- tinger, Hift. Oriental, p. 418. Ibid. 1. 26. The art of writing had been known and pra6lifed by their countryman fob, and by the tribe of Hamyar, &c.]] The Hamyaritic charadter was proba- bly of very high antiquity. It was intricate and per- plexed, making no regular diilindion betwixt the different letters ; from whence perhaps it had the name of Al Mofnad. Moramer Ebn Morra is faid to have been the inventor of the Arabic character, not many years before the birth of Mahomet. The let- ters invented by Moramer were, however, rude and imperfed, fimilar to, or perhaps the fame with, thofe which are called Cufic, and which are often found on ancient monuments in the Eafl. The elegant and beau- tiful character now in ufe amongft theArabs, was form- ed from the invention of Moramer, by Ebn Moklah, almoft 300 years afterMahomet, and finally brought to perfection by Ali Ebn Bowab in the following century. Vide Ebn Chalican apud Poc. Spec. p. 155 — 159. Ibid. 1. 30. The refl of the Arabs were totally iinac^ quainted with this if fid art] Ebn Chalican all'erts, that, at the fir ft publication of the Koran, there could not be found in the whole country of Yemen one iingle pcrfon who could read or write Arabic. Vide Poc. Spec. p. 156. Ibid. 1. 31. Thcfe of Mecca in particular were peculiar- ly diftinguifhedas ignorant ajidil literate^ cvcii to a proverb. ] The inhabitants of Mecca were called the illiterate, in oppofition to thofe of Medina, who from their ac- quaintance with the arts of reading and writing, not Icfs NOTES. I^ lefs than from their being in pofleffion of a written iyftem of religion, were diitingiiilhed by the title of ihc people of the book. Medina was principally inhabited by Jews and Chriitians ; and hence Mahomet in his Koran fre- quently applies this title to Jews and Chriftians in general. See Koran, p. 71. 158, &:c. P. 46. 1. 16. Many of them ahfolutely denkd the pof- fibility of a future flat c of exiflcnce^ There were fome amonglt the Arabs who denied both the creation of the world, and a future refurreftion ; afcribing the origin of the univerfe to what they call nature, and referring its final diffolution to the effefi: of time. Others, though they admitted a creation, yet totally i-ejected every idea of a refurreftion of the dead. Vide Shareitan. apud Poc. Spec. p. 134. Ibid. 1.26. Should again be called into exiftence^hz.^ Vide Poc. Specim. ubi fupra. Millii Differt. i. de Mo- ham, p. 14. P. 47. I. 3. And believed-that even the animals, &c.l Pocock, on the authority of Al Jauhari, Kbno'l A- thir, Sharcilani, and other Arabic authors, relates a fmgular cuftom which prevailed among fome of the Arabians, of tving a camel over the grave of the dc- ceafed, where it \v:as left to perifh without food ; lelt its matter ftiould fuffer the difgrace of walking on foot ill another v/orld. Ibid. 1. 25. A felicity CGnJlfling cnl^ of pure and fpir- itual fleafure, would have been too refined for the grofi andfcnfial conceptions of the uncivilized tribes of Arabia. Gardens fairer than that of Eden, %vatered by a thoufand jir earns, and enlivened by the blooming, beauties of para- dife, feemed better calculated to excite their dc fires, and to engage their attention.'} Mr. Bayle, with his weli known rage for paradox, and with the difplay of his ufual acutcnefs, controverts this pofition, and aflerts,^* S 4 tliat «. Arti.:le Malomd, Note ^L X NOTE S. that the Chriftian doctrine of a future (late is far more alluring to the unchaflc and fcnfual than the Mahometan. But we reply, that the influence of favourite ob- jects diflindlly conceived as to their reality, their power of pleafmg, and their precife degree of augmen- tation, would in depraved minds certainly overpower the efficacy of thofe indiflind ideas which Chrifiianity excites concerning the joys of futurity. Even the growing and unlimited magnitude of the happinefs propofed by the gofpel, would have lefs luftre in the imagination, and lefs efficacy upon the will, than corporeal pleafures, of which the dcfire is fliarpsned by partial anticipation. The experience of every day proves, that the efli- mation we put upon objeds is rarely proportioned to their intrinfic or to their comparative worth. All happinefs is indeed relative, not merely to the capaci- ty of an intelligent being, but to his defires : and thofe defires, it is well known, are influenced by cuf- tom, by education, and by a variety of caufes, vv^hich miflead both our opinions and our choice. Even, good itfelf implies a fuitablenefs between objedls and their appetites : and therefore, in chufmg it, we are governed by thofe defires which are moll ftrong, as by thofe objects which are likely to give them the full- efl; and moft: exquifite gratification. Mr. Lockef has very ably pointed out the abfurdity of the ancient philofophers in their difputes concerning \h& fiaiunum bonum^ as exifliing exclufively and folely in things in- ternal, or external, in wealth or fenfuality, in virtue or contemplation. " For, as pleafant talles depend not on the things ihemfelveSjbut their agreeablenefs to this or that particular palate, wherein there is great variety ; fo the greateil happinefs confifls in the having thofe things which produce the grcatcft pleaf- ure, f Cn Human Ur.clti/lsni'dno;, book ii. chap. s.\I. fcii:. r^. NOTES :d ure, and in the abfence of thofe which caufe any dif- turbance, any pain : now thefe to different men are very different things." Thus we may account for the diverfities of good among beings who are of different fpecies, and thofe who are of the fame. The enjoyments of men have no attrai5lions to a brute, becaufe he cannot attain them ; and becaufe he does not comprehended them. The enjoyments of a virtuous man have fcarcely any attractions among the vicious, becaufe they place their happinefs in gratifications of another kind j and therefore it is to little purpofe that we infifl upon the fuperior pleafure of virtue, till the tendency of a bad man's defires towards fenfual gratification, and the prepoffelTions of his judgment in favour of them, are fully correfted. Otherwife, he confiders the appeal as made from experience to probability : he hears the voice of religion addrefling his weakefl defires, in oppofition to his flrongefl : and under thefe cir- cumllances, Mahometanifm would, in many cafes, prevail over Chriftianity. I am here ftating, not what is mofl/TodcT to be done, but what it is mofl probable that a wicked man would do. Reafon, if its ferious and impartial voice could be heard, would teach even the worfl of men to flrive for that happi- nefs which is mofl adapted to their capacities, as moral agents : but the pafTions of the fenfualifl pre- vent him from hearing that voice, and determine his will to prefer what is mofl agreeable to himfelf. Even Mr. Bayle himfelf feems to argue on the principle for which I am contending, that pleafure is relative as to the degree both in which it is perceived and defired. " Make a man feel more pleafure, fays " he, in a geometrical problem than in fenfuality ; *''and he will renounce one for the other." Now the pleafurcn of the contemplative geometri- cian arc doubtlefs fuperior to thofe of the licentious voluptuary. xu NOTES. voluptuary. Yet as the latter has very confufed and imperfed notions of the enjoyments pofleiVed by the former, he cannot eafily be made to feel them ; and he mull fulTer his impartial reafon to prevail over the fuggeilions of his memory, and the impulfes of his afi'edions, before he can value them properly, or de- fire them fmcerely. Their real fuperiority, even if he could attain them, would be before he attained them doubtful ; and the renunciation of v/hat he has hi- therto purfued, is a condition to which he probably would not accede, for the fai^e of foniething which he is defired by others to purfue. The p'eafures o; fpeculation, oppoied to thofe of fcnfe, are in the eye of calm and unprejudiced reafon fuperior : but the reafon of the fenfualiil is not unprejudiced, and there- lore his choice is imwife. It is necelfary to guard foras of the foregoing po- fitions from the mifconceptions of thofe, who, be- caufe defire is neceilary to the exilteuce of good, would make the flrength pf defire the meafure of that good ; and contend that all kinds of good equallv' defired, are when attained really equal, to creatures refpectively capable of enjoying thera. But furely inftincl, the proper good of a brute, (lands below rea- fon, the proper good of man. The enjoyments to which inftinct leads, are inferior to thofe which rea- fon can attain. To a mind capable of enjoying them, moral and intelledual pleafures are fuperior to thofe which arife from the poifeflion of wealth, or the gror tification of fenfc. In the fame manner \ve juftly rea- fon, that the fpiritual fehcity promifed by the gofpel, is far more fuited to the capacity and to th$ dignity of a moral agent, and productive of nobler and more delightful fenfations, than the carnal pleafures which Mahomet holds out to his followers. The dehres ot that Vv-hich the mind apprehends, whether jullly ov unjurily, as good, maybe equally llrong ; theobjecl^ may NOTES. xi« may be equally proportioned to thofe defircs ; and yet, from the peculiar properties of the objects them- i'elves, and from the greater phy ileal capacity of enjoy- ing them, one fpecies of good will be fuperior to ano- ther. But if this fuperiority is not perceived, it can- not operate as a motive. Hence, when the love of virtue itlelf is not excited ; when its tendency to pro- duce a higher degree of good is uniteadily believed, or coldly felt ; when the affections which prevent us from believing it tirmly, and feeling it ardently, are controled ; a religion which difcountenances vices, will be lefs acceptable than a religion which tolerates them in its precepts, and even cherifhes them by its fandions. Now, Chrillianity endeavours to control thofe afteftions, by ihewing that habitual and unre- llralned gratification will end in mifery. And here furely we have a flrong argument in vindication of the punifiiment denounced by the gofpel ; becaufc the profpeiSt of that punilhment is necefl'ary to the extindion of thofe defires which oblf ru6l us in form- ing a right efcimate of the happinefs God has referv- ed for us, and which check the impulfe of other and better delires, directed to other and better objects. We have before obferved the inftin&ive and almoft jrrefiltible propenfity of the mind to form its expec- tations and opinions of another ftate from the ob- jeds which are in this world contemplated with the greatefl fatirfacftion, and purfued wdth the greatefl: earneftnefs. The warrior in many countries again ^xpeds to triumph over his foes. The champion exult.* in the idea of again fnatching the prize from his competitcy. The fenfualilt preffes forvv'ard to the continuance and increafe of corporeal enjoyments ; efpecially, when the authority of religion itfelf is fu- peradded to thofe natural appetites which have gain- ed the llrongelt poifeliion of his foul. So juft, upon the principles ot recondite philofophy, and fo corref- pondent xiv NOTES. pondent to the praftice of men, and to the fecrct and ilubborn habits of their minds, is the dechvration of fcripture, that where a ?nans trcafure is, there ivill his heart be alfo. We cannot then be fiirprifed, that the fenfual nian carries on his defires irom the prefent to the future, and prefers known gratifications to the iin- hiown. He does not indeed make a wife and profit- able choice : he does not act as rit';ht reafon would induce him to do, from an unprejudiced and compre- henfive confideration of all his polhble intr^refts, in uU their real circumflances \ but he ads according to that view of good which more immediately and more forcibly prefents itfelf to his dilieinpcred mind. Shall we be afiied then, whether Chriitianity holds forth its purer rewards in vain ? Does it encourage us to feek what cannot be attained, becaufe it cannot be defired ? Does it, with the moll infulting riiock- ery, condemn the vicious man for refufmg what it h altogether, and at all times, out of h),s power to ac- cept ? No furely. He that made us, and knows our infirmities, has not dealt with us thiis treacherouHy and cruelly. On the contrary, he has adapted the rehgion of Jefus to the real conftitution of our na« ture, to its real defers, and its real capacity of im- provement. By its precepts the gofpel firfi endea« vours to correct the irregularity of our appetites ; and then by its promifes operates moft pov/erfully upon our defires thus correfted. In propofmg, indeed^ thofe objeQis which awaken the attention and gratify the wiihes of the libertine, it would have couuteraft- ed one great purpofe for which the Saviour of Man- kind appeared in the world ; the purpofe of making- us better, in order that we may become happier. On the other hand, by refining the afiedions, and by providing fuch enjoyments as are moft fiiitable to them when they are moft refined, it is calculated to exalt us to the greatelt happinefs of which, as mora! and NOTES. XV and as rational beings, we are capable. But If men perfift In a deliberate and contemptuous difrcgard of the precepts of Chriftianity, they will feel no flrong or regular cff^vEts from its promifes. If they contin- ue in their indulgence of the groffer appetites, they will liiten with reiu lefs than fifteen, befides concubines. But this was a pecuHar privilege, founded on the exprefs words of God himfelf. *' O prophet, we have allov/ed thee thy wives, unto whom thou haft given their dower, and alfo the Haves which thy right hand poifell'eth, of the booty which God hath granted thee ; and the daughters of thy uncle, and the daughters of thy aunts, both on thy father's fide and on thy mother's fide, who have fled v/ith thee from Mecca ; and any other believing women, if fhe give herfelf unto the prophet : in cafe the prophet defireth to take her t6 wife. This is a peculiar privilege granted unto thee, above the reft of the true believers." Eor. chap, xxxiii. P. 107. 1. 17. Now felcd-ing the temple of Jerifcfle?:!^ and nowthat of Mecca^ See Abu'l Fed. p. 54. Ibid. 1. 27. We fee his Jieps every where marked iinth hJood and. defolatio7i\ The impetuous courage of Ma- homet, and the cruelty and devaftation with which the progrefs of his impofture was attended, remind us of the chara^(^er which the Roman poet has o^iveA T3 [ ^^' XXIV NOTES. of Cjefar. Nothing furely can be more defcriptive of the Arabian conquerer than the following lines : *' Acer et indomitus, quo fpes, quoque ira vocaflet, *' Ferre manum, Sc nunquam temerando parcere ** ferro : " SuccelTus urgere fuos — — — " Impellens, quicquid fibi fumma petcmi " Obftaret ; gaudenfq ; viam feciffe ruina." Lucan. lib. i. 1. 146. P. 108. I. 16. Precluded -from the per vfal of hooks and the ufe cf ivritin^l In the xxixth chapter of the Koran, Mahomet introduces God as thus addrefllng him : " Thou cduldefl not read any book before this ; neither couldeft thou write it with thy right hand : for then had the gainfayers juflly doubted of the divine original thereof." Hence his follow- ers, inftead of being aihamed of this pretended igno- Tance of their mafter, aS'edl to glory in it, as affording a decifive proof of his divine miiTion, and frequently call him (as indeed he ftiles himfelf in the Koran) *' the illiterate prophet." Ibid. 1. 35. He ?iot only expre/fed a defire to exercife., hut a^ually pra^ifed that 'very art^ hc.~\ " Narrabat A.nas ex AI-Barao inquiens : " Tylenfe Dhu'l-Ka'ada (anni Hcgira fexti), Apoftolus Dei Vifitationem fa- cram indixerat : Sed Meccevfes nol uerunt ei faculta- lem concedere Meccam intrandi. Poflrriodum vero (pace inita), ftipulatus eft cum illis fe per tres dies tantum Mecct^ (ad Vifitationem compiendani) mora- turum. Ubi autem ad fcribendum Diploma accef- ferunt, fcripfere (Mohammedis Scribas)' : ■ H^ funt conditiones , quas vohfciim ftlpidatus eji Mohammed Apostolus Dei. Ibi {MecceTifs) dixerunt : Hujufmodi •Jiequaquam ralum habcbhmis : Nos en'un fvolumus fcri- bi): IVI o H A M M E D Ab D o ' L L A K ifilius . Tu uc ad j4/i??l dixit : Dclcto ijlud^ Apostolus Dei. At iile, Minimi *v€rdj inquit, Per Deiim ! Non Dclebo ic in ccienium.. Mox NOTES. XXV Mox Apoftolus Dei Chirographum accepit, et qnam- vis prorius fcribendi imperitus efl'et, fcriplit : iia:funt conditmcs, quas Jiipidatur Mohammed Abdo'i.lahi ftlius : Nofi ingredietiw Maccam armatus, ?iifi t^ntian cincius gladio, coqiie in vagina recondito : Nemincrn ex ejus civibus fecwn inde cxire compellet^ ft ijie civis i7i cci remaner-e 'uolucrit, $cc." Al-Bochari. " Cum autem invaiefceret jEgritudo ejus, dixit, Afferte mibi atra?nentum et charia?n, ut fcribam njobis Librum, quo poji obitwn ineum non erretis in atefnuni.'* Abu'l Feda, p. 136. The Mahometans indeed have recourfe to a mira^ cle to account for the former of thcfe inftances, and afcribe the latter to a delirium under which the prophet laboured, from the violence of his difeafe. k is, however, far more probable to fuppoie, that in thefe trying fituations the impoftor for a whik. forgot the ignorance which he had :iflumed, and difcovered his real character. P. 112. \. 25. GoJitributesaneiu^ aflriking. and pecul- iar fpecies of coidence for ihe truth of his religion'] In the form of didaftic precept, in which the Koran is writ- ten, and under that authority of a raaftei: which its author affumes, it was not diffiouljL for him to impofe upon the fuiipie and unfufp.e£ling. minds of followers, who were interelled in the fucceli; of his anas, and to \vhom the idea of his divine comraiiTion was welcome, as affording the fpirit and fupport of their party : nor is there a neceffity for recurring to any other caufe for the admiration in which this, compofitioii is ftili' held, than that principle of attachment, vdth which all Eien are difpofed to. reg.2.rd the earlieil productions of their country. But different is th,e manner in which the doctrines of Chriftianity are communicated to us, and devoid of the advantages of which Mahomet availed himfcli, i€ the fimple und hiftoricai form. under which the Bi^ T 4 _ Vgranhcrs xxvi N O V E S. ographers of Jefus Chrift reprefeut him. Uninvefted with the impofing charader of mailer, unadorned with the fplendour of conquell, his hiltorians bring him forward to our view, only as the apparent broth- er and equal of human kind. It is to the innocence and funpiicity of his life, more perhaps than to the powers with v/hich he was invefted, that they call the attention of men ; and while thus artlefsly, in the common fcenes and amidll the humble duties of life, they difplay the character of their mafier, they leave the truth of his pretenfions to be fupported in every, future age, as it was left in the age which was djllin- guilhed by his appearance, by the unprejudiced rea- loning and inference of mankind. In this mode of compofition no arts are employed to excite aftonifhment, or to impofe upom creduhty. The condud of the man is united with the preten- fions of the teacher. The life of him who aifumed to himfelf the title of the Saviour of the world, is re- lated with the fame fimplicity as that of the loweft of our kind ; and no other admiration is claimed from its narration, than what is due to the ftriclefl forrn of hiflorical truth. That the manner, therefore, in which the gofpels are written, is not efleemed as grand and unequivo- cal a teftimony of the truth of Chriftianity, as that of the Koran is by the followers of INIahomet, can only, be afcribed to that fplendour of evidence, in which this comparatively meaner one is loll ; being too dif-' tant and refined to all eft the generality of mankind. P. 127. 1. 7. To exemplify thefc extraordinary quali- 'lies and virtues in the actions of that I:ft\ hc.~\ A more regular and minute difcuilion of Chrift's life and ac- tions does not fall within the defism of thefe Sermons. Eifhop Newcome has indeed exhauiled the fubjeft, in a work which docs equal honour to the piety, taftc and learning of its excellent author. See Ohferva^ t'lons NOTES. ^xy\\ lio7n on our Lord's Condiift as a Divine InftruElor^ a?i(i o?i the Excellence of his Moral Charader. P. 142. 1. 26. And mor 6 particularly by Chri^/l in the Gofpel~] And when Jelus the Ion of Mary faid, "' O Children of Ifrael, verily I am the apoftle of God fent unto you, confirming the law which was delivered before me, and bringing good tidings of an apoflle who ihall come after me, and whofe name ihall be * Ahmed." Kor. chap. Ixi. A fmiilar prediftion is impioufly afcribed to Chrifl in the fpurious Gofpel which bears the name of St. Barnabas ; a work which (as I have already obferv- edf) probably was originally forged by heretical Chriilians, and has fmce been interpolated to fup- port the pretenfions of Mahomet. The Arabic orig- inal ftill exiils in the Eaftj ; and tranflations both into the Italian and Spanilh languages are preferved in Europe, By the obliging comm.unication of the Rev. Dr. Monkhouse of (Queen's College, who has in his pofleflion an ancient MS. containing the v/hole Spanilh verfion, and alfo a tranflation of a confider- able part of the work into literal Englifh, I am ena- bled to give my readers fome fpecimens of this auda- cious forgery, and of the manner in which the gof- pel hiftory has been here corrupted, fo as to accom- ?nodate it to the interefts and aflcrtions of the Koran. Chap. 96. " And when Jefus had ended his prayer, the High Prieft cried with a loud voice. Stay, Jefus ; we want to know w^ho thou art, for the quiet of our people. He anfwered, I am Jefus of Na5:areth, born of Mary, of the (lock of David, a mortal man, and fear God, and * Ahmed is derived from the f;;ine root, and figolfies the fame as Mdam- tneJ, or Mabomtt. \ Sermon viii. p. 184. I See SuL\ Prelim. Difcour. p. 74. xxvlii NOTES. and feek his honour and glory. The High Prieft faid, It is written in the book of Mofes, that God is to fend the Mellias, who will c(5|ne and declare the truths and bring mercy with him ; and therefore we defire thee to tell us, if thou art the Meffias whom we expefl: ? Jefus faid, It is true that God has fo promifed, but I am not he : for he was created be- fore me. The High Prieft faid, By thy words and- figns we know that thou art a prophet and a faint of God ; and therefore I intrcat thee in his name and for hisfake, that thou tell us how the Mefliaswill come. Jefus anfwered, As God liveth, I am not that Meflias which the tribes of the earth wait for, as God prom- ifed by bur father Abraham, faying, In thy family I will blefs all tribes. But when God fhall take me out of the world, Satan will again promote this curf- ed fedition, making the wicked believe that I am the Son of God. My words and doctrines wil! be corrupt- ed, infomuch that fcarce thiriy faithful fhaii be found. Then will God have mercy on his people, and will fend his melTenger into the world, by whom he hath created all thinsjs : and he will come from the fouth with power, and will deftroy idolaters, and take away from Satan the empire that he has over men, and will bring the mercy of God and falvation to thofe that ihall believe him. Blelted arc thofe that ihall believi N O T £ S»^ fbefacred test] Trifling variations are by no rfiein^ fuliicient to deprive any writings of their claim to the characler of purity.. , If this Ihould be admitted, the authenticity of every compofitlon which has pafled, through the hands of trarifcribers, and tranflators, is ^t once deltroyed ; for, fijice all are unavoidably fubject to fuch erros, all muft of cou.rfe be involved in one common cenfure, It may be further obferved, that, on this ground, ftiong objeclions might be made to the Koran itfelf^ as well as to our Scriptures. That too has its various readings, in the accurate collection of which the laborious induftry of I\^ahometan com- ijientators has been frequently employed. Dif- ferent copies difi'er materially in the titles of the chapters, the number of verfes, the diftinclion of pe- riods, and other particulars which flrongly aifed the fenfe. , The Koran of the Perfians and the Shiites differs in many places from that of the Turks and Sonnites, even in effential points. Yet that any argument can be drav/n from hence againft the purity and integrity of their fcriptures,.the followers of Mahomet abfo- lutely and univerfally deny. P. 144. 1. 12. That no futh corrupfim as he pre- tended, bits ever happened to our fcripturcs.'] Whilil we defend the integrity of our fcriptures againft the ab- furd and futile objedions of Mahomet and his delud- ed followers, we (liould be careful left by our own in- judicious condufl; v/e give occafion to a fnnilar charge. A ferious and thinking man cannot but be alarmed at that unbounded iicenfe of conjecture, and that ex- travagant rage for correftion and alteration of the facred text, which has been too often indulged by pious, though injudicious commentators. That the text of every edition which we poffefs, ftands fre- quently in need of emendation, ca.nnot perhaps bd denied. But the proper mode of emendation feems to NOTES xxxiil to be, not by fanciful fpeculation and conjedure, but by fads ; by a comparifon of ancient MSS. and an- cient verfions. Much too is to be affeded towards the illullration of otfcure and difficult paiTages of fcripture, by an accurate knowledge of the cognate languages, and by an attention to the manners and cuitoms of ealleni nations. P. 157. Further Obfervaimis on Miracles i In judging of Miracles there are certain criteria, peculiar to the fubjo£t, fufficient to condudl our in- quiries, and warrant our determination. AlTuredly they do not appeal to our ignorance ; for they pre-- fuppofe, not only the exiftence of a general order of things, but our adual knowledge of the appearance that order exhibits, and ,of the fecondary material i-aufes from which it in mofl cafes proceeds. If a miraculous event were effected by the immediate hand of God, and yet bore no mark of diflindiori froin the ordinary effeOs of it3 agency, it would im- prefs no conviftion, and probably awaken no atten- tion. Our knowledge of the ordinary courfe of things, tliough limited, is real j ?.nd therefore it is eflential to a Miracle, both that it diller from that courfe, and be accompanied with peculiar and unequivocal fip^ns; of fuch difference. But as the term Nature is frequently ufed, and fbmetimes abufed, in the controverfy upon this fub- Jeft,. I beg leave to ftate, in a few words, my own ideas. The courfe of nature is, we are fold, fixed and unalterable ; and therefore it is not confident i?ath the immutability of God, to perform Miracles. But ^xxiv N 6 f E b. But^ furely, they who reafon in this manner beg the point in queftion. We have no right to allume, that the Deity has ordained fuch general laws as will ex- clude his interpofition, and we cannot fuppofe that he ■ivould forbear to interfere, where any important end could be anfwered. , Th;s interpofition, though it controls, in particular cafes, the energy, does not diminifli the utility, of thofe laws. It leaves them to fulfil their own proper purpofes, and only elTeds a diftincl purpofe for which they were not calculated. . Let us, however, afk what is meant by this fiiabil- ?ty in the order of nattire ? Gravitation is known by experience, and acts according to rules which repeat- ed obfervation has enabled us to afcertain : Yet mag- netifm, of which the rules are doubtlefs equally fixed, though more imperfectly known, fufperids the force of graviation. Js nature then imcertain in her ope- rations ? of fliould we Hot rather fay, that in different circumfi:ances her agency is different ? ilave not both their proper fphere of a6tion ? and does it betray any credulity in admitting the evidence of thofe v/ho have marked their oppofite efTects ? In certain cir- cumfiances v/e may have ftrong reafon to expect, that the one would a6t rather than the other. But by a competent witnefs of the fafl: we Ihould foon be perfuaded to believe, that a Phenomenon, however Extraordinary in itfelf, and however di^Terent froni our preconceived opinions, really exifted. If the courfe of Nature implies the general laws of matter and motion, into which the moil oppofite phenome- na may be refolved, it is certain that we do not yet know them in their full extent ; and therefore that events which are related by judicious and difintereft- ed perfons, and at the fame time imply no grofs con-, tradidion, are pollible in thcmfelves, and capable of a certain degree (>f prcofi If NOTES. xxxtf It" the courfe of Nature implies the vs^hole order oi^ events which God has ordained for the government of the world, it includes both his dtdlhary and extra- ordinary difpenfations ; and among them Miracles may have their place, as a part of the univerfal plan- It is, indeed, confident with found philofophy, and not inconfiftent with pure religion, to acknowledge that they were difpoled by the Supreme Being a1: the i'ame time with the more ordinary effc£ls of his pow- er ; that their caufes and occafions were arranged with the fame regularity ; and that in reference chief- ly to their concomitant circumftances of perfons^ and times, to the fpecific ends for which they were employed, and to our idea of the immediate necelTity there is for a divine agent, Miracles diifer from com- mon events, in which the hand of God a£ts as effica- cioully, though iefs vifibly. On this confideration of the fn'bjed, Miracles, inftead of contradi£ling Nature, form a part of it : and all I objeQ: to is, that what our limited reafon and fcanty experience may com- prehend, fhould be reprefented as a full and exact view of the pofhble or a£bual varieties which exiil ia thes^orkof God. • Are we then affed, whether Miracles be credi- ble ? we reply, that, abfcracledly confidered, they are not totally incredible ; that they a're capable of indireft proof from analogy, and of dlred: from tef- timony j that, in the common and daily courfe of worldly affairs, the improbability of events, whichj antecedently to all tcflimony, was very great, is over* conle and deilroyed by the- authority of competent and honeft witneiTes ; that the .Chdflian Miracles were objfefts bi real and proper ei^pcrience to thofe who faw them ; and that whatfoever the fenfes of mankind can perceive, their rfeport may fubftantiate. Should it be aflxcd, whether Miracles were necls- SAR.Y ? and, v;hcther the end propofed to be elliptl-ed U by xxxvi NOTES. by them could warrant fo immediate and extraordi- nary an interference of the Almighty, as fuch extra* ordinary operations fuppofe ? to this we might an- fwer, that, if the fa6l be eftabliflied, all reafonings ^ priori concerning their neceflity muft be frivolous, and may be falfe. We arc not capable of deciding on a queflion, which, however fmipk in appearance, is yet too complex in its parts and too extenfive in its objeft, to be fully comprehended by the human underftanding. We know not what event is nccef- fary, or what means are requifite to effed it^ Events apparently infignificant are frequently combined with others of the greatefl magnitude and importance, and indeed fo combined as to be infeparable from them 5 nay, to have been the conditional caufes without which they could not be produced, and even the ef- ficient caufes which actually produced them. Whether God could, or could not, have effedled all the ends defigned to be promoted by the gofpel, without deviating from the common courfe of his providence, and interfering with its general laws, is a fpeculation that a modeft inquirer would carefully avoid ; for it carries on the very face of it a degree of prefumption totally unbecoming the ftate of a mor- tal being. Infinitely fafer is it for us to acquiefce ii> what the Almighty has done, than to embarrafs our minds with fpeculations about what he might have done. Inquiries of this kind are generally inconclu- five, and always' ufeiefs. They reft on no folid prin- ciples, are conducted by no fixed rules, and lead to no clear convidion. They begin from curiofity or vanity ; they are profccuted amidil: ignorance and error ; and they frequently terminate in im.piou^ pre- fumption or univerfal fcepticifm. He that arraigns the neceflity of an extraordinary providence, may in the end queflion even the exig- ence of an ordinary one : fof, when the genius of wild 1^ O T E S. xxx^ii wild and undlflinguifliing Inquiry is once let loofe on ground where there, are no direcl: paths, and no fet- tled limits, who can tell whither the extravagant and impetuous fpirit may be carried ? God is the beil, and indeed the only judge how far Miracles are proper to promote any particular de- fign of his providence ; and how far that defign would have been left unaccompliflied, if common and ordinary methods only had been purl"ued. So, from the abfence of Miracles we may conclude, iii. any fuppofed cafe, that they Were not necelTary ^ from Iheir exiftence, fupported by fair teflimony, in any given cafe, we may infer with confidence that they are proper. Now we are not only capable of oppofmg one con- jedure to another, and of confronting an objeclion founded on metaphyseal fpeculations by an anfwer of the fame kind ; but we my proceed on grounds yet more folid and fatisfaftory. A view of the ftate of the world in general, and of the Jewiih nation irt particular, and an examination of the nature and tendency of the Chriftian religion, will point out: very clearly the great expediency of a miraculous in- terpofition : and when we refleft on the, gracious and important ends that were to be effected by it, wc Ihall be convinced that it was not an idle and ufelefs difplay of divine power ; but that, while the means eifecled and confirmed the end, the end fully juflified and illuftrated the means. If we reflect on the almoft Irrefiftible force of prej- udice, and the flrong oppoHtlon it univerfally made to the eltabllfliment of a new relic-ion on the demoli- tion of rites and ceremonies, which authority had made facred, and cuftom had familiarized ; if we re- fle£t on the extent and importance, as well as the fm- gularity, of the Chriftian plan ; what was its avowed purpofe to effeft, and what difficulties it was neceffa- U 2 riiy xxxvlii NOTES. tily called to flruggle with before that purpofe could be effedled ; how much it was oppofed by the opin- ions and by the pradice of the generality of man- kind ; by philofophy ; by fuperllition ; by corrupt paflions, and by inveterate habits ; by pride^ and fen- fuality J in fhort, by every engine of human influ- ence, whether formed by craft, or aided by power ; if we ferioufly refle£l on thefe things, and give them their due force (and experience inews us that we can fcarcely give them too much) we fliall be in- duced to admit even the neceffity of a miraculous interpofition, at a time when comraon means muft inevitably, in our apprehenfions, have failed of fuc- eefs. The revelation of the divine will by infpired per- fons is, as fuch, miraculous 5 and therefore, before the adverfaries of the gofpel can employ with propri-* ety their objections to the particular Miracles on which its credibility is refted, they Ihould ihew the impoflibility of any revelation whatfoever. If they grant, what indeed they cannot difprove, the pofiible exiftence of a revelation, it is abfurd to fay that the Deity can interfere in the act of revealing his will ; and cannot, in fupplying evidences for the reality of his interference. In whatfoever age the revelation be given, fucceeding ages can know it only from teftimony ; and if they admit, on the report of their fellow creatures, that God had infpired any being Vv'ith the preternatural knowledge of his will, why fhould they deny that he had enabled the fame being' to heal the fick, or to cleanfe the leprous ? And how^ may it be afked, fhould the Divine Teacher give a more direft and confiftent proof of his preternatural commiffion, than by difplaying thofe figns and v^on- ders which mark the finger of God ? As then the fa6t itfelf implies no impoHibility, the- credibillty of it will depend upon the character of thofe NOTES. XXXI36 thofe who report it, and on the end which it profefTes to purfue. That the Apoflles could not be deceived, and that they had no temptation to deceive, has been repeat- edly demonftrated ; and fo powerful is the proof ad" duced in fupport of their teflimony, that the infidels of thefe later days have been obliged to abandon the ground on which their predeceflors flood ; to dif- claim all moral evidences arifing from the character and relation of eye witnefles ; and to maintain, upon metaphyfical rather than hiflorical principles, that Miracks are utterly incapable in their own nature of iixiiting in any circumftances, or of being fupported by any evidence. To illuftrate thefe general obfervations on the fub- ject of Miracles by an induftion of particular in- ilances, would be unneceflary. Thofe inflances have been frequently adduced, and ably enforced, by feveral eminent writers ; and never more fuccefsfully than by one* whofe long and well fpent life has beeii ufeful to the world, and ornamental to the learned body to which he belongs ; whofe erudition derives frefli luftre from his virtues ; and whofe character is equally venerable as a defender of the Chriftian faith, and as a pattern of Chriftian meekncfs and behevo-; knee. P. 173. k II. When the caiipb Omar^ihe contempo-' vary and ccmpanhn of Maho?net, zvas foUcited to /pare the celebrated library of Alexandria^ he replied to this cf- fcd:'] See Abu'l Pharaj. Hift. Dynaft. p. 180. Har- ris's Philolo^^ical. Inquiries, p. 251. Modern Univ. Hift. vol. i. p. 498. P. 176. 1.4. M^Jwaetfeems to have e7itertahied 've- ry grofs and ?JiiJiaken ideas of the Chriftian Trinity.'] If we trace the Chriftian religion through the various, tevolutions of the church, we fliall obferve two doc- U 3 trines. *. Sec Dr, Adams's juJicif the wodd. But thofe -who Itoocl firm- v/cre oppreffed with grief, feeing him die whom they underllood to be Jefus .} not recoJleding what he had told them. And in company vrith his mother they were prefent at his death, weeping continually. And by means of Jofeph Abarimatheasj they obtained from the prehdent the body of Juda?. And they took, him down from the crofs, burying him with much lamentation in the new fepulchre of jofeph ; haying wrapped him up in linen and precious ointments." •r- v> Chap, cc " They all returned, each man to his houfe : and he who writeth, with James and John, went with the mother of Jefus to Nazareth. And the difpicles who' did not fear God with truth,. went by night and ftole the body of Judas, and hid it ; fp reading a report that he [i. e. Jeius] had rifen again ; from whence fprung great corifuiion among the people. And the high prieft com.mranded,. under pain of anathema, that no one fhould talk of him 5 and on this account raifed agreat perfecution, banilhl ag fome, tormenting others, and even (loning lome, to death : becaufe it was not in the po\yer of any one to be filent on this fubjed:. And then carhe news to Na>;areth, that Jefus had rif- en again. And lie that- writeth, defired the mother of Jefus to le?ve oif her lamentation. And Mary faid^ Let us go to Jerufalem, to fee if it is truth. If I fee him, I iliaii die content.'* Ciiap. ccxxi. " The Virgin returned to Jerufalem with him that v/riteth, and James and John.j.tlie fame day that the decree of the high pricfl came out. And a5 Ihe fear- ed God, though file knew the command was unjuft, ihe entreated thofe who talked with her, not tofpeak . , of f Itfetlyis written in t'.ic ?.t.5, hlvili N O t £ ^. of her Son. Who can fay, how -we were then affea- ed ? God, who knows the heart of man, knows, thai between thfe grief for the death of Judas, whom we underftood to be Jefus, iind the pleafure of feeing him rifen again, we almoil expired. And the angels who were the guardians of Mary went up to heaven the third day, and told Jefus what was pafling. And he, moved with compaflibn for his mother, entreated of God that he might be feen by his difciples. And the compaffionate God ordered his foUr favourite^ angels to place him within his own houfe, and to guard him three days : that they, and they only, might fee him, who believed in his doctrine. Jefus defcended, furrounded with light, into the houfe of his mother : vvhere were the two fillers, Martha and Mary, and Lazarus, and he that writeth, and John and James, and Peter. And when they faw him, they fell with their faces on the earth, as if dead. And Jefus lifted them up ; faying. Fear hot, for I am your Mailer. Lament not from henceforth, for I am alive. They were aftonifhed at feeing Jefus^ becaufe they thought him dead. And Mary v/eep- ing faid. Tell me, my Son, why, if God gave thee power to raife up the dead, did he confent that thou ihouldeft die, with fo miich reproach and fhame to thy relations and friends, and fo much hurt to thy doctrine, leaving us all in defolation ? Jefus replied, embracing his mother. Believe me, for I tell thee the truth, I have not been dead : for God has referved me for the end of the world. In fiying this, he de- fired the Angels to manifeft themfelves, and to tell how he had paiTed through every thing. At the in- ftant they appeared, like four funs : and all prefen& proftrated themfelves on the ground, overcome by the prefence of the Angels. And Jefus gave to all of them fomething to cover themfelves with ; that they miglit be able to hear the Angels fpeak. And Jefus NOTE S. xlix Jefus faid to his mother, Thefc are the Minillers of God. Gabriel knows his fecrets ; Michael fights Avith his enemies ; iUratiel will cite all to judgment ; znd Azracl receives the fouls. And the holy Angels told, how they had by the command of God taken up Jefus, and transformed Judas, that he might faf- fer the punilhmcnt which he wiflied to bring on JefuSi And he that writeth laid, Is it lawful for me to d.il