tihvaxy of tire trheolo^ical ^tmimvy PRINCETON • NEW JERSEY •3 PURCHASED BY THE MRS. ROBERT LENOX KENNEDY CHURCH HISTORY FUND BR52.0 C35 Chapell, F.L. (Frederic Leonard), 1836-1! Great awakening of 1740. THE Great Jlwakenitid of 1740 THE Htm nmM\m of 1740 "Bj/ Rev. F. L. CHAPELL Lectures delivered before the Baptist Church of Ev- anston, ILL, the Second Baptist Church of Chicago^ and other churches; published by request in "The Standard," and used for the Gordon Missionary Training School, Boston. PHILADELPHIA American :©apti6t publication Soctctig 1903 COPYRIGHT 1903 BY THE AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY Published December, 1903 jfrom tbe Socictie's own press Content0 I. The Great awakening of 1740— Introductory 7 II. John Wesley and the movement IN Great Britain 23 III. Jonathan Edwards and the MOVEMENT IN NEW ENGLAND . . 42 IV. Gilbert Tennent and the Move- ment IN the Middle Colonies . 67 V. George whitefield, the Cosmo- politan evangelist 90 VI. James Davenport and the Dis- orders no VII. results and Lessons of the Great awakening 126 I ^be 0reat Bwaftening ot 1740— UntroDuctors |HE chief religious fact of the eight- eenth century, the great revival of spiritual religion, is usually termed the Great Awakening of 1740, be- cause its chief intensity, in this country, culminated about that time. But it was by no means confined to that year. It com- menced more than a decade before that date and continued with power more than a de-_ cade after it. Yea, more ; it is continuing yet, for the revivals with which we are re- peatedly visited, are but the echoes and reverberations of that mighty blast of the gospel trumpet which then awoke a slum- bering church and a slumbering world. Nor will these echoes cease till the mightier blast of Gabriel's more majestic trump shall announce the glories of the kingdom of God. I. Let us, in the first place, step back one hundred and forty years or thereabout. 8 and take a little survey of the religious con- dition of the world in the first third of the eighteenth century. And I may as well say at the outset that it is a dark, sad pic- ture that we shall look upon, for the eight- eenth century, one of the most interesting epochs of all history, as a whole is a dark period. Dreary and dreadful epithets have been well-nigh exhausted in describing it. It has been called gloomy, melancholy, shameful, fearful, terrible, infernal, devil- ish. It has been termed the age of skepti- cism, the period of the eclipse of faith. It -has been likened to the awful volcano, and to the terrible storm of the whirlwind or the hurricane. And it was all that it has been called. For I know not any other period of the world's history that shows such a general and terrible sway of essen- tial devilishness as that which, during this century, commenced with a false philoso- phy in the cloisters of the savants and ended with the Reign of Terror in the streets of Paris. The enemy came in truly like a flood, but the Spirit of the Lord lifted up a standard against him. But it is not my purpose to survey the whole battle ground, to canvass the con- flict in continental Europe, and in the do- 9 mains of the Roman and Greek commun- ions, but merely to show how the Lord came to the rescue of those who had the best claim to being his witnesses in the world, namely, the Protestant churches of Great Britain and America. I. Let me begin by noting some of the political and material facts of history at this time. And the first thing that strikes us Americans is that this great republic of the Western world had not then come into being. There was in America only a line of colonies on the Atlantic seaboard, con- taining not more than two millions of in- * v" habitants. New York, Boston, and Phila- • delphia were hardly more than overgrown villages. George IL was our king. Slavery existed in Massachusetts and Connecticut, as well as in Georgia and South Carolina, while numbers of Indians swarmed around the young and growing settlements. Yet the colonies were so far established as to have come into a secure and comfortable position, while the disaffection toward the mother country, that afterward produced the Revolution, had not then arisen. Across the ocean the kingdom of Great Britain was in a high state of material pros- perity. By a series of salutary events, af- 10 ter the dethronement of James the Second, throughout the reigns of William III., Queen Anne, and George I., she had come into a commanding position. The Protestant house of Brunswick was firmly established on the throne of the united kingdom under a constitutional monarchy. The victories of Marlborough had humbled her rivals, the founding of the Bank of England and the establishment of the East India Company, together with the tribute of the American Colonies, had greatly advanced her financial interests ; and material prosperity had be- gun to produce its invariable"fruits of profli- gacy, dishonesty, and rash speculation. The times were" so good politically and materi- ally that they were bad enough morally and religiously. 2. Another thing to be noticed was the intellectual status of the times. It is always the policy of Satan, where he cannot pre- vent a movement hostile to him, to mount it himself and, riding upon it, manage it in his own interests. And this was the method in which he was now treating the Protes- tant Reformation. When he found that he could not prevent free inquiry and the right of private judgment ; when he discovered that he could not prevent the establishment II of a Protestant church, he determined that he would push free inquiry into the ex- tremes of skepticism and unbelief, and that he would make the Protestant church as devoid of true spiritual life as the Romish had been. This, it seems to me, is the explanation of the fearful skepticism of the eighteenth century. Over the intellectual world Satan breathed the benumbing chill of unbelief regarding things divine and supernatural. Three leading classes of minds especially fell under its influence, philosophers, states- men, and historians ; and these gave direc- tion to the general drift of thought. Many of these stronger minds of this general period, such as Hobbes and Locke among philosophers, the Earl of Shaftesbury and Lord Bolingbroke among statesmen, Hume and Gibbon among historians, were his chosen apostles for the dissemination of infidel sentiments. Thus the foundations were destroyed. This reigning unbelief, together with the political and material pros- perity already noticed, was fatal enough to true piety. Natural religion was almost the only one believed in at all, and this, as we well know, has but little strength or con- serving power. As a consequence the public, 12 losing faith in God and the Bible, lost faith in and respect for restraining principles of any kind and a sort of lawlessness and vicious- ness began to be rife that alarmed the better class of reflecting minds. 3. It was then that popular literature com- menced the work in which it has since so largely exerted itself ; namely, of attempt- ing to correct and teach morals. It was then that Steele's " Tatler " began to tell of the vices of society ; then that Addison's "Spectator" began to hold them up to view ; then that the '* Guardian," also ed- ited by Steele, sought to defend the public from its insinuating enemies, and soon after that Johnson's "Rambler" peregrinated for the same good cause. And these did pro- duce some superficial improvement ; but it was only superficial, as such work always will be unless it is based on the firmer foun- dation of revealed truth and solemn penalty. It is in vain to say this or that is shameful and disastrous, unless you can show, from eternal truth, why it is shameful and to what disaster it will lead. II. But now, leaving the general view of the times, I wish to present more particu- larly the state of the Protestant churches at this period and the condition of religion within them. And what were the denomina- tions then in existence ? Think a moment. There were no Methodists, and that is say- ing a great deal "when you are taking an inventory of true religion. Again, there were very few Baptists, and that too is saying a great deal when you are searching in the same direction. The Baptists could, indeed, claim at this period a recognized denominational existence of a hundred years, both in Europe and America. There were now eight small Baptist churches in Rhode Island and a number of others scat- tered through the various colonies, with a respectable number in several European States. But nowhere did they have a legal right to exist except in Rhode Island. In England they were persecuted till the Act of Toleration in 1689, and in America they only obtained full legal rights after the Rev- olutionary War. They, therefore, did not form any very important, practical element in the religious status of this period, though their protesting voice was often heard. The only Protestant denominations of prominence in Great Britain and America at this time were Episcopalians, Congre- gationalists, and Presbyterians, and these even were not as we find them now. They 14 have greatly changed, at least the last two, in two important particulars : first, in their relation to the State ; and second, in their practical use of infant baptism. These three churches were at that time State Churches : the Episcopal, of England ; the Congregational, of New England ; and the Presbyterian, of Scotland. They were, moreover, tenacious of these political rela- tions and regarded the Baptists as pestilent heretics because they pleaded for a separa- tion of Church and State. Infant baptism too was by them universally practised, and the infants baptized were very generally regarded as Christians and as full members of the church. Practice on these latter points, however, was not uniform through- out these three churches, nor indeed in the same church at different times or in differ- ent places. Hence I must particularize a little in regard to each of them and state a little more fully what was involved in infant baptism and the union of Church and State. I. The Episcopal Church was, perhaps, the best exemplification of these doctrines. Slie held that at baptism the child was regenerated and ingrafted into the church, and that such regeneration and church 15 standing was necessary to good civil stand- ing. And as the partaking of the sacra- ment of the Lord's Supper was an expres- sion of church standing, so it was necessary to civil standing. The law required every one who was to hold a civil office to ''qualify*' himself by partaking of the sacrament. Hence, any clergyman who refused to give the sacrament to any appli- cant inflicted a civil injury and was liable to prosecution at law for the offense. Any one who had been baptized and had learned the creed and catechism and was not scan- dalous in life had a legal right to the sacra- ment. In all this there was not the least reference to the spiritual state of the heart. Any discrimination in favor of true religion by evangelical rectors only produced trou- ble for them. John Wesley, during his sojourn in Georgia, was prosecuted at law for refusing the sacrament to a person whom he judged to be unfit for its recep- tion. Such a thing as intelligent conver- sion was not at all insisted upon in the Episcopal Church. 2. The condition of the Congregational Church of New England, though theoretic- ally different, had come to be practically about the same. The original Puritans i6 who emigrated to this country for con- science' sake knew what true religion was, and they attempted to insist on this in their church order. The Cambridge plat- form, laid down in 1648, declared that none except such as might " in charitable discre- tion " be considered regenerate persons should be admitted to the communion. But the union of Church and State and the theory of infant baptism overthrew the laudable intention. By the law of the >yNew England colonies no one could hold a civil office, or even vote at elections, unless he were a church-member. Hence, those who had been baptized in infancy would, of course, claim their church-membership in order to citizenship, and if church-mem- bers, surely they must have all church privileges. Thus, in course of time, the Congregationalists receded from the noble ground of the Cambridge platform and no longer required evidence of conversion or change of heart in order to full church- membership. 3. Among the Presbyterians the case was much the same. They have, indeed, ever theoretically held that saving faith was necessary in order to the partaking of the communion. Hence, their preparatory lee- / 17 ture and the meeting of the session before the communion in order to examine the baptized in reference to their qualifications for partaking. But in Scotla^od- the Presby- terian Church was established by law, and all except the ignorant and the scandalous had a legal right" to the sacrament. Therefore, the sessions could not and did not insist on evidences of conversion, but sheltered themselves behind a curious theory of some of their theologians, to the effect that regeneration was such a subtle and mysterious operation that no one could judge from his feelings whether he was a subject of it or not. But it was taken for granted that all who had been baptized and were not scandalous in their lives were regenerated without regard to their emo- tions or affections. Hence, all respectable young people were usually admitted to full membership when they arrived at years of understanding. By this method a large share of the communicants of the Presby- terian Church of Scotland had no practical experience of spiritual religion. And the churches of this order in America were constructed, as far as possible, on the Scot- tish model. Thus we find that at this time the three ' B -^ i8 leading denominations of Protestantism ignored vital piety in their church order. The voice of the few and scattered Baptists was raised from time to time in favor of a converted church-membership, but with little general effect since they had no legal or influential standing. III. From this constitution and order of the churches several grave results followed. 1. The churches themselves were in a very low state of spiritual life and power, since a large portion of their members knew nothing of that heart experience which constitutes the essence of true religion. Scarcely any discipline could be enforced. No prayer meetings bearing any respect- able proportion to the whole membership could be held. The church as a whole was not a spiritual body. There might be a few spiritual members, but what were they among so many ? The forms of religion were observed, but the power was wanting. 2. Another result was that the ministry was fearfully deteriorated, being composed in many cases of those who made no pre- tension to personal piety, for there was nothing to hinder such taking the holy office. If a change of heart was not neces- sary for the membership, why was it for the ministry ? If religion consisted in the ob- servance of the sacraments and a moral life, truly he who was faithful in these re- gards and was talented and well educated was a proper candidate for the ministry. Thus it came to pass that there were not only unconverted and unspiritual men in the ministry, but there were found leading and prominent divines to argue that such a state of things was perfectly proper, that K it was not necessary to have an experi- mental knowledge of religion in order to preach it. This view seems strange to us now. To be sure, many of the incumbents of the livings in the Church of England are worldly men. It does not perhaps shock us to think of rectors and curates in the Establishment, who make no pretension to personal piety. But to think of this among * Congregationalists and Presbyterians does seem decidedly incongruous ; yet such was the sad fact before the Great Awakening of 1740, and may be again should spiritual life run low. 3. But the saddest result of all was the effect that this state of things had upon the i general public. People heard scarcely any- • thing in many cases from the pulpit that was at all searching, for a dead ministry 20 must, of course, preach dead sermons. But if the truth did sometimes fall upon the peo- ple, it had but little effect, when they re- membered that they were already members of the church, and that they had fulfilled the requirements of the church. They con- sidered that they were Christians already, in some sense, for they had been baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and they were re- membering Christ in the holy sacrament according as they were commanded. They were doing all that they could, and what more was required of them ? And, as if to take off the point of any scriptural arrow from a new-birth text that might penetrate the joints of this churchly harness, it was maintained in many quarters, as I have al- ready remarked, that regeneration was so subtle an operation as not to be cognizable by the affections. If one had obeyed God in the ordinances he was to presume that he had been regenerated, even though he might not be aware of any experience of religion in the heart. The general result was, of course, that the need of conversion was practically denied. Such was the state of the best, or at least the most influential portion of Protestantism 21 in the earlier years of the eighteenth cen- tury. And what saith the Scripture ? " If the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness." If, now, you will remember what I said in the earlier part of this discourse as to the mighty wave of skepticism and irreligion that was pouring over the earth from the high places of in- tellectual thought ; if you will remember that Christianity was by the learned re- garded only as a subject of ridicule, un- worthy of inquiry or discussion ; if you will remember that worldly prosperity was causing men to feel independent of God ; if you will take all these things into con- sideration, you will see that to human view Christianity was clean gone forever. The floods of ungodly men were sweeping on, and a corrupt and enervated church had neither doctrine nor life wherewith to stem the tide. You can therefore understand why the infidel element of the time was confident of a complete victory, and why the faithful few mourned with such a pa- thetic and bitter cry over the departing glories of Zion. IV. For there were a few godly souls that humbly lamented the state of affairs, and were sending up their prayers to the 22 great Head of the church for the interposi- tion of his mighty power. Bishop Burnett and Dr. Watts, and men of such spirit, were mourning, praying, and exhorting, while Bishop Butler and men of cool, steady faith were preparing their arguments to show the thinking minds of the day that it might be a sensible thing, after all, to consider the claims of a revealed religion. But He who purchased the church with his own precious blood, saw from on high the situation and prepared his chosen agents. In the year 1703, three able and ^/ godly ministers of Christ, one in England, one in America, and one in Ireland, had each a son born to him, and these three infants were, in the providence of God, to become the men that were largely instru- mental in the revival of true religion, sever- ally, in the bosom of the three churches we have been considering. The names of V these three children were John Wesley, Jonathan Edwards, and Gilbert Tennent. And a few years later there was born one whom no one church or land could claim as her own, George Whitefield, who with a heart as large as the world, traversed up and down its length and breadth, preach- ing the everlasting gospel to every creature. 23 and serving as a uniting bond between all those who loved our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity and in truth. To trace the lives, times, and works of these men, and to set forth the great awak- ening which God wrought through them, will be the object of the remainder of these discourses II 5obn Wicelc^ ant) tbe fHlovemcnt in Great Britain E are now to look at John Wesley and the revival movement in the Episcopal Church of Great Britain — a movement commonly known as the rise of Methodism, and resulting, at length, in the formation of the Methodist denomination. Two considerations, however, will pre- vent me from attempting anything like a detailed account of the particular historical or biographical facts in the case. One is, that it is simply impossible, in a single dis- course, to portray, even with tolerable full- ness, a movement so vast in its propor- tions, so mighty in its power, and so grand in its results as the rise of Methodism ; the other is, that it would be presuming upon 24 the intelligence of my audience to rehearse these common facts, so ably and frequently set forth by this influential people, regard- ing their early history. I shall take it for granted that you are already acquainted with the manner in which Wesley and his fellow-laborers were called and prepared to be leaders in this revival of religion so pre- eminently apostolic ; and that you under- stand that this work was carried on by Wesley to the grandest results without any . design or wish of founding a new church, but simply as a revival of true religion in the English Church. In fact, I trust that you perceive that this was not a work of Wesley, or of any other man, or any body of men, but of God, and that as such it was beset, opposed, and fought at every step by the great enemy of God. This is the feature of the movement that strikes my mind as worthy of special considera- tion — the grand spiritual conflict — and con- sequently I shall, in this discourse, simply call your attention to those points where Satan pitched his battle with the Lord and was so signally foiled. If, however, you find your knowledge of the history scanty, so that you cannot easily follow the thread of my remarks, I would advise you never to read another work of fiction until you have faithfully perused this grand record of sublimest fact. I think I see at least eight distinct points in this history where the Lord gained a grand victory oyer the great adversary of souls. I. The^ first is where the enemy under- took the destruction of the child. Old tactics, these. He set Pharaoh's officers after the infant Moses, and Herod's soldiers after the infant Jesus. And in like manner he set the Epworth rabble to burn the house wherein was sleeping the little boy John Wesley. It is well aflame before any of the house- hold wakes, all is confusion and terror, each rushes for himself through window, or door, or whatever egress is possible, the mother literally passing through the fire. And as they gather outside looking anxiously in each others' faces by the glaring light of the burning dwelling, they discover that one of the large flock is missing. The little boy John is in there yet, upstairs fast asleep, while the roof above him is burning and his bed even is already taking fire. Madly the father attempts the passage of the stairs, but in vain. How the arch fiend exults ! How he will nip that precious bud, and destroy that potent germ ! But no ; 26 God hath otherwise ordained. The boy wakes, leaps from the bed, and flies to the window. Some kind-hearted peasants make a human ladder, one on top of another, and down comes the boy. John Wesley is saved to the world. But this is not all. That escape stamped upon the mind of the thoughtful boy, and upon the heart of the prayerful mother, and upon the soul of the believing father, the idea of destiny. They felt that the escape was for a purpose. Henceforth the father planned, and the moth