n^w U' ,)\1 BSI475 .aB8i dmm 'Ih Tn : '.V w:j. n^i-<^~ v^x^xvi ^.^. ot ^^^^ ^^'^Wm Me,n; ^^k PRINCETON, N. J. % Shelf. Division _H S 1 ''T T5 SecHon ^CJ . ^::io\ Number. LECTURES ON ECCLESIASTES. BRADLEY. HENRY FROWDE Oxford University Press Warehouse Amen Corner, E.G. LECTURES ON ECCLESIASTES DELIVERED IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY BY THE VERY REV. GEORGE GRANVILLE BRADLEY, D.D. DEAN OF WESTMINSTER AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1885 \^An rights reserved J PREFACE. The following Lectures were delivered in Westminster Abbey on Saturday afternoons during three months of the winter of 1884-5. They form one of several courses of weekly addresses on portions of, or subjects connected with, Holy Scripture, which have been given in the same Church by Canons of Westminster, or by the Dean, during the last four years. The experiment of inviting the public to meet in the Abbey on week-days for such a purpose was first tried by the late Dean Stanley, who in the very month in which he died was devoting a portion of every Saturday afternoon to a Lecture on the Beatitudes. Of the aim and purpose of those who have followed his example enough has been said in the opening words of the first of the following Lectures. The publication how- ever of the present course may require a word of explana- tion, or even of apology. Its author can make no claim to have enlarged by independent researches of his own the field of knowledge accessible to the theologian or the student. He is no Hebraist, and his acquaintance with Talmudic and Rab- vi Preface. binical literature is necessarily derived from such English, French, or German sources as are open to any educated reader. Nor have his own studies been such as to have enabled him to throw any fresh light on the patristic exe- gesis of the book of Ecclesiastes. He has read much and thought much on every line of that book; but he cannot venture to look on the present volume as a contribution to exegetical or theological literature properly so called. It has no such pretensions. But the obvious interest taken in these lectures during their delivery encouraged him to believe that the large number of singularly patient and attentive listeners whom M'eek after week he saw before him in the Abbey might represent others, who would attach some value to a popular and continuous exposition of the contents of a book which has by turns attocted, Derple xe(J. and iSfi£il£dii*^«iy£«i8 through many centuries, and the study of which has been prosecuted with renewed activity both in England and on the Continent during the last few years. Nearly a quarter of a century has passed since Dr. Ginsburg's valuable edition placed in the hands of the ordinary English reader, not only an excellent commentary on the book itself, but also an exceedingly interesting sketch of earlier and more recent Jewish and Christian commentators, as well as of the ancient versions. Since that time such works as, among others, those of Dr. Samuel Cox\ Dr. Wright^, and, above all, the scholarly and instructive volume of Dean Plumptre ^ have ^ ' The Quest of the Chief Good.' 2 'The Book of Koheleth,' 18S3. ^ 'Ecclesiastes or the Preacher,' 1S81. Preface. vii testified to the general interest felt in the history and contents of this portion of the Old Testament by the English public. On the other hand, the recent volume of INI. Renan, anil the elaborate work of Graetz. are sufficient evidence that the question of the authorship and design of a book which deals with problems of such wide and enduring interest has not lost its hold on readers in France and Germany. In preparing himself for the writing and delivery of his own lectures the writer has freely availed himself of the labours of these and many other authorities, both English and foreign ; among the latter he is especially indebted to Ewald, Hitzig and Reuss. He has rarely attempted to acknowledge his special obligations to any single writer or commentator, nor indeed would he find it easy to do so. Nor had he any wish to load his pages with footnotes and references. He must be content with thankfully ac- knowledging the aid which he has received from many sources, and in expressing the hope that he has done something towards facilitating for the general reader, and for those who have little leisure or taste for more methodical study, the acquisition of some acquaintance with the con- tents and general teaching of one of the most interesting and instructive, yet most obscure of the writers of the Old Testament. His own views of the contents and history of the book he has embodied in the pages that follow. Those who care to read them will remember that they were delivered at intervals of a week to a mixed congre- gation, necessarily of a somewhat uncertain and varying character, and will excuse a certain amount of repetition, which under such circumstances was unavoidable. viii Preface. It should be added that the Revised Translation of the Old Testament was not published till the present volume was in the Press ; references however to its rendering of some of the most obscure or most disputed passages have been inserted wherever it appeared desirable. LECTURES ON ECCLESIASTES. LECTURE I. Introductory. Let me begin by reminding those to whom I speak of the origin and aim of this course of lectures. It occurred to some of those whose privilege it is to min- ister in this venerable and sacred House of God, that there were many who would gladly meet here, on these winter afternoons, for another purpose than that of either joining in actual worship, or of receiving that spiritual instruction to give which is the highest of all objects to which a Christian preacher can devote himself. It was thought that there were not a few who, in an age of keen enquiry and active thought, would hail some attempt to bring before them some of the results of a careful and exact study of various portions of that manifold and com- plex collection of sacred literature, which we call by the common name of the Bible, and in which we Christians find the record of that gradual manifestation by God of Himself to man, which this morning's second lesson spoke of as at last perfected in His Son \ The experiment was fairly tried * Hebrews i. i . Lesson for November 8. B 2 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [i. by one and another among us, and ihe result more than con- firmed our expectations. It was found that there were many, men and women, young and old, not a few of them men immersed in the busy and anxious life of this great metropolis, who felt a keen interest in receiving some assistance towards understanding more clearly than before, either the relations towards each other of some of the component parts of the Old and New Testament, or again, the actual contents, and meaning, and the place, not only in the Bible, but in the divine education of the human race, of one or another of the books — especially of the less generally studied books — which it comprises. It was the latter of these tasks which I attempted two years ago, when, for some weeks together, I spoke on the general contents and teaching of the Book of Job. I tried then to bring home to those who, week after week, encouraged me by their sympathy and attention, the true scope and sub- ject of that marvellous book, which some outside the circle of the Church of Christ have described as the greatest of all works of human genius, some within that circle have looked on as a fruitless and discursive discussion of inscrutable problems. It was my object to lead my hearers to see that, if they Avould read its chapters carefully and consecutively, read them even in the striking language of our own stately, though at times obscure and inadequate, translation, they would find in them something more than a touching record of Oriental resignation, or even than an example to all time of loving submission to the will of a God who gives and who takes away. I tried to make them feel with me that they had set before them in that book something more than this ; I wished them to recognise that the ' patience of Job ' of which St. James speaks included other elements than those of mere submission and acquiescence. I aimed at putting before them the true and actual picture which the book presents — a picture of a human I.] Introductory. 3 soul face to face with the very darkest problems that can even now try the intellect, or tax the faith, or perplex the con- science of mankind ; of a soul tossing to and fro in a moral and spiritual agony, which overmastered the sense of all bodily torture, of all material and domestic losses ; a soul despairing, doubting, questioning, appealing, yet holding fast in the darkness to its God, and finding at last, not indeed a full solution to all life's riddles, yet peace and reconcili- ation with the God whose power it had acknowledged, but whose goodness and whose justice it had not shrunk for a time from boldly questioning. I had reason to believe that some of those who took part in those weekly meetings shared with him who spoke to them in the absorbing interest of a portion of sacred hte- rature which, it is scarcely too much to say, has lain till almost within the present generation — I hardly dare say how long or how generally — almost practically unexplored by the ordinary reader. It was suggested t^iie^t the close of those meetings, to undertake on the next occasion a more difficult, a less obviously instructive, in some ways, I fear, a less attrac- tive, task — that of attempting to interest a congregation like the present in the contents and history of the Book of Ecclesiastes. I shall not hesitate to state at once the reasons which made me for some time shrink from, and even postpone, the attempt. In the first place, the study of the Book is beset with special difficulties, other and in some respects far greater difficulties than those which cross the path, and tax the judg- ment, of the reader of the Book of Job. Whatever may be the occasional obscurities of portions of that book, its chief current of thought runs, in the main, clear and transparent. In Ecclesiastes the case is quite different. The book is in many respects — not in one but in many — an enigma. It is not 4 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [r. only that some of the most important verses — sometimes just j^ «^ those on which we would lay our hands as containing at last the IT ^is* surest indications of its true aim, and of its highest and most momentous teaching — are written in a language which is, to us, so obscure that we dare not rely absolutely on the meaning which we would fain attach to them. We feel like those who, toiling up some Alpine height, either see the pathway sud- denly disappear, or must rest their feet on a support that they feel may give way suddenly beneath them. This is a difficulty which it shares in some, though in a far less, degree, with some of the most striking portions of the Book of Job. But quite apart from these, and from other difficulties, in which I yet hope to interest you, two problems meet us at its very threshold, which, in treating the Book of Job, we can in one case easily answer, in the other cheerfully put aside. In the first place, it is not merely the obscurity of this or that verse which we find baffle us in reading Ecclesiastes ; but when we ask the question which seems the first and most important of , / K^ V .all questions, viz. what is the main de sign and puripos e of the /-y r^'^'oook, we are at once bewilderedD}an^multiplicity of answers. ^ To some it has presented itself as merely the sad outpouring of the deep melancholy of a world-weary monarch, sated with all that life can offer. Others have found in it ' a peni- tential dirge; ' the sad confession and recantation of a re- pentant Solomon, reconciled at last to the God whom he had forgotten. There are not a few who will tell you something quite different. They will confidently assure you that its main object was to prepare the way for Christ, by expressly teach- ing the doctrine of a future life, and of a judgment beyond the grave. A Christian Father, St. Jerome, was followed by an army of commentators, who read in it a discourse on the blessedness of an ascetic, and even of a monastic, life. Others, on the other hand, will give you a very different answer; they will tell you not merely that it contains a protest against an enervating asceticism, but that it breathes throughout the spirit I.] Introduciory. 5 of the merest scepticism, or of utter indifferentism, or of simple epicureanism ; or that its real undertone is that of a cynical materialism, or of a gloomy fatalism, or of a still darker pessimism ; they will absolutely deny its having any claim to rank as a religious book at all , still less to take its place in the most sacred of all books. Again, while some tell us that it is a genuine record of the age of Solomon, others see in it a philosophical treatise of centuries later, saturated with Greek thought. To some it is a political pamphlet ; a satire, almost a lampoon, on some Eastern government; to others a handbook for courtiers ; with some it ranks as a systematic treatise ; with others as a drama, or dialogue, in which two or more voices answer and refute each other; to others it seems a collection, put together almost at random, of various say- ings; to others a strange soliloquy, full of cross currents and conflicting eddies, now steeped in sadness, now commend- ing enjoyment, now pointing to the reign of law, now asserting the supremacy of mere chance, preaching now a kosmos, now a chaos. Need I go on ? I have said enough to show you that any discussion of the contents of the book is beset at its very commencement with serious difficulties. I could not ask an intelligent listener to come here, and yet pass by in silence questions on the view that we are to take of which our whole conception of the character of the book must turn. And there is at least one further question, already indicated, to which it will be impossible for us to close our eyes. JThe a^ithnrshipj or rath(^r t he age, of t he Book of Job is a question of exceeding interest. But it is one on which, in the entire absence of any direct evidence, all reasonable Christians will be prepared to argue dispassionately, and to feel them- selves at entire liberty to accept any view that may commend itself to their thoughtful judgment. They will listen with impartial calmness to those who place its composition in the early days of Moses, or even earlier still, and to those who 5 Lectures on E celestas tes. [i. would bring it down to the days of the captivity of Judah, and the apparent shipwreck of the national hopes. But with this book the case is entirely different. We have, on the one hand, the apparently clear and precise statement of the book itself, ascribing the authorship to King Solomon. We have also the fact that this statement was accepted by the con- cordant voices of Jewish Rabbis and Christian Fathers, I had almost said by the unanimous verdict of the Jewish and of the Christian Church, and was absolutely unquestioned till, at all events, the period of the Reformation. On the other hand, the modern student is called on to consider the value and weight of arguments enforced by the learning and authority of the vast majority of the great Hebraists of the last two generations. These tend to show that these chapters are of far later date, were placed, like the Book of Wisdom — also generally attri- buted to Solomon — for very natural reasons in the mouth of the master of Hebrew wisdom ; hnt that their style, their substance, their social, polit ical, and reli gious allusions, their v ery texture and fabric jjje-absolutel^ jrreconcileable w ith eithe r the person or the age of^jag^juoloiBon ]_ and tha^hey form one of the latest portions, if not the ver y latest, of the He brew canon. , You will see at once a further reason against an attempt to interest so mixed, so unknown, an audience in so entangled and thorny a question. It was like asking you to tread a fiery soil, whose slumbering ashes might burst out in bitter contro- versy. And it was also one on which any who spoke at all would rightly wish to speak with a well-matured conviction ; neither to embrace heedlessly what was new, nor to cling blindly to what was old. But it was not only the difficulties of the book that made me hesitate. I feared also that I should find its discussion far less instructive than that of that other book. I say less instructive for this reason. The teaching, the practical teaching, of the Book of Job, is one which the Christian teacher I.] Introductory. 7 may gladly welcome for himself, and commend most earnestly to his hearers. The picture which we have there of God's love and tenderness for the afflicted soul — of His forbearance towards doubt, despair, reproaches, questioning — of the fatherly love and goodness that lie behind the most searching affliction, the thickest clouds and deepest darkness of life — is a lesson which will never grow old, till all tears are wiped from all eyes, till ' the morning breaks and the shadows flee away.' Ye have heard, says St. James ^, of the patience of Job, and have seen the end of the Lord^ that the Lord is very pitiful and of tender mercy. It is a lesson that is not displaced, but illuminated, by all the teaching of Jesus. But the single- minded reader of the Book of Ecclesiastes, he who will allow that book to speak for itself, and does not read other meanings into almost every verse, must Jeel at^eyery step that^_ he is brea thing a differentjjjmosphere from th at of the^ teaching oF the Gnsppls. He may quote a striking warning here, find a wholesome lesson there. He may lay his hand on words, now of far-seeing prudential wisdom, now of keen insight into human nature. He may refuse to surrender this strange Preacher, royal or discrowned, to rival and unchristian schools, to the sensualist, to the fatalist, to the materialistic pessimist, to the easy-going worldling, who claim him for their own. He will find, in even the lowest and most depressed and depressing tones of ' the still sad music ' which he makes, voices that are not their voices, notes which they never reach. But he will feel, for all this, that a great gulf separates his teaching from that of Him who breathed a quickening spirit into all human life, who offered to every child of Adam, not the lesson, 'Vanity of vanities, all is vanity,' but fresh interests, new motives for activity, new- spheres of work, new hopes, new aims. The teaching which it off"ers will be, must be, if not wholly, yet very largely, a teaching by contrast. 8 Lectures on Ecclcsiastes. ]\, And, lastly, I feared that the study of the book might prove less interesting and less attractive to those who were invited to join in it. I felt this, not only on the grounds already stated, the difficult and complex questions that beset its discussion, the riddle that the book itself presents, the riddles that encompass it. These very questions and perplexities have, I know, an interest of their own. But I felt it on other grounds. The book has no doubt exercised a strange spell over certain minds. The modern satirist has found in its sad refrain, ' Vanity of vanities, all is vanity,' words to point the nakedness and hollowness of much that seems most im- posing and most brilliant in the world around us. Its feebler echo finds a strange place here on the walls of a Christian church, in a memorial to the dead^ Another denizen of Poets' Corner embodied his interpretation of its substance in an elaborate and forgotten poem^. But in the main, am I not right in saying that those who come here, those to whom life comes home with all its press of duties, its warmth of affection and its difficulties, cares, problems, sorrows, and interests, do not care to come here for lessons of mere disillusion ? These they can find elsewhere. They ask for something more sustaining, more satisfying, more upholding; something that will sweeten what is bitter^ njjfe, not expose— its-bit terne s s -; that will give substance to what seems hollow, not ring changes on its hollowness. It is not the ' weary ' only and the ' heavy-laden ' who ' come for rest to their souls' to a place like this. We all shrink from a view of life, from dwelling here at least on a view of life, that seems to rob that life of all its interest, its dignity, its noble- ness, to paralyse its activity, to stifle its enthusiasm, to re- move from it all hope of progress to a higher and purer ideal. * ' Life is a jest, and all things shew it ; I thought so once, and now I know it.' Inscription on Gay's monument in Poets' Corner. * • Solomon, or the Vanity of the World,' by Matthew Prior. I.] Introductory. 9 And lastly, for many of the elements that give such interest and such colour to even the long and, in some sense, mono- tonous chapters of the Book of Job, we shall look here in vain. The touching story, the fire, the agony, the revulsion from calmness to passion, the bitter pleading, the cries, the tumult, will be all wanting. For the glimpses into the secrets of a real but far-off life, those traces of an early world and half-settled, or almost primeval stage, for the splendour of the pictures of nature, animate and inanimate, which form the background of that long strange drama, we shall look in vain. AH here is calm and measured ; the face of the speaker is pale and still; he has no narrative to set before us \ the stream of feeling runs at times very deep and full, but silently and noiselessly. A dreary sense of the miseries and worthlessness of human life broods around us as we read ; haunts us perhaps as with his accents in our ears we sweep past the leagues of habitations that spread around this vast metropolis. There is poetry, but it is the poetry, if not of despair, of despondency, of decay, and gloom. There is cheerfulness, but it is not that of joyous hopefulness or gladsome faith, but of a forced and grim acquiescence in the irresistible doom of humanity. Yet for all this, in spite of the undeniable difficulties of the book — in spite of its inadequate and far from Christian teaching — in spite also of the apparently uninviting nature of its contents — I feel convinced of the inherent and undying interest of the questions which it will suggest to us. I am inclined to hope that those who will join me, so far as pos- sible, in its study, will agree with me that it is well worth our study. We shall find, I think, that even in its saddest, most despairing accents, even in what we might call its most repel- lent aspect, there is something eminently, pre-eminently, human ; that it touches chords which at one time or another have found an answering fibre within us all. For it points at every turn to questions that, even now, come home, and very Id Lectures oji E celestas fes. [i. nearly home, to the human heart ; to a wider range, it may be, than are stirred even by the majestic eloquence of that other book. If you turn with any lack of interest from its study, I believe that the fault will lie not so much in the obscurity or dulness of its chapters, as in the incapacity of your guide. May I now add a few words on the position which, apart from their special contents, this book and that to which I have already referred hold in our English Bibles ? The ordinary reader of the Old Testament will find it easy to make, to a certain extent, a classification of the different books which form its contents. He will notice at once that the first five books — commonly called the Pentateuch, or the Books of Moses, or the Law — are followed by a long series of historical and narrative books, in which the story of the Jewish race is brought down from the death of Moses to the period that followed the return from the Babylonian captivity. They include a kind of appendix, so to speak, in the Book of Esther. Now, if he passes on at once to the concluding portion of the Old Testament, he will find that it consists entirely of the writings of seventeen Prophets, or inspired teachers and preachers, of the Jewish nation ; and that these are arranged, partly in chronological order, but partly also, as is the case with St. Paul's Epistles, in that of their relative length and importance. They begin with Isaiah, they end with the latest in time of all the Prophets, with Malachi. So far the classification, though quite different from that current among ancient and modern Jews, is obvious and simple. The Pentateuch, and the Histories, on the one side of the volume ; the Prophets on the other. But between these two portions, come five books, which do not so readily lend themselves to any one classification or title. First in our own version, first also in that Greek transla- tion which, we must remember, took the place of the Hebrew I.] Introductory. ii Bible with the enormous majority of the early converts to Christianity ; first also in the Vulgate, or Latin Translation, which was for centuries the one form in which the Bible was accessible to the mass of Western Christendom, — first also in the great translation of Luther, which formed such an epoch in the religion, language, and history of Germany- comes the Book of Job. It was placed there no doubt in defer- ence to a received, if questionable, tradition of its extreme antiquity, which gave it precedence in the Syriac Version over all but the Books of Moses. Of the contents of this great and sacred poem — for poem you will remember, with the exception of its two opening and its one closing chapters, it is throughout — I need say nothing more. I will only re- mind you that it deals with the same terrible problem, the apparent want of righteousness in the government of the world, that prompts the saddest passages in the book which we are about to study. Nor need I describe to you the book which follows ; that collection of Psalms, in which we can study the manifold outpouring of the human spirit in its communings with the Spirit of God, from the days of the Poet King to a far later age. Immediately after these two totally different embodiments of the very highest flight of inspired human poetry — the one the Book of Job, so far like the Book of Ecclesiastes, that it is almost a Gentile poem, with scarcely a single allusion to the history, or the scenery, or the associations of the Holy Land, the other saturated with the distinctive national life of the singers of Israel — come three books : Proverbs, Ecclesiastes^ and the Song of_ Solomon^_They are profoundly different in many points from each other, but they are alike in this, that they each^lainij directly _or„indirectly, the .authorship of , SnloTnon, who is Stated by some Jewish authorities to have written the last in his youth ; the Proverbs in his wise matu- rity ; the book on which I am now to speak to you in his dreary and disillusionised old age. 12 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [i. Of the other two of these books I need say little. You will all be aware that, taken in its first and literal sense, the Song of Solomon is not a religious poem at all. It lends itself readily enough to pious and mystical and allegorical ap- plications; and in this manner has been largely used for ages alike by Jewish and Christian writers. But the student who looks merely to the most obvious meaning of verse after verse, will find borne in upon him, perhaps first of all, the recognition — shall I say the thankful recognition? — of the fact, that even in the Sacred Canon there is room, side by side with the most spiritual yearnings of the Psalmist, for the fervent description of natural affection, room also for the simple genuine sentiment of delight in nature, for the singing of birds and the voice of the turtle, for the green fruit on the fig-tree, and the scent of the early vine tendrils^. Nor need I say more than one word on the Book of Proverbs. It deserves, and should receive, a separate treatment of its own. I will only remind you that both in the longer addresses which form its opening ten chapters, and in the short anti- thetical, well balanced, aphorisms or proverbs, couched almost always in double lines or couplets, which follow ; and again in its personification and glorification of Wisdom as opposed to Folly — as also in its total absence of any local colour or national allusions — it has not a little in common with the wholly different book on which I purpose to speak to you. To that book, and to some of the questions connected with its design, meaning, and history, I will ask your undivided attention next time. I have little doubt, as I have said already, in spite of the doubts and difficulties that lie couched at the very portal, and the patches of obscurity and darkness through which we must feel our way, that when we have once passed within its precincts, we shall find much to interest and impress, and something to aid us. Those dreary sentiments, those disjointed proverbs, those hollow wraiths ^ Stanley's Jewish Historj^, vol. ii. p. 241. I.] Introductory. 13 of unavailing consolation, those wearisome repetitions, those uninteUigible utterances, those terrible pictures of human destinies, those snatches of startling and, as it might seem, wholly irreligious teaching, those ' hard sayings,' will gather a fresh interest as we try to track them through their many windings to their true sense and actual teaching. We shall see in them, if we do so faithfully, no body of Christian doctrine wrapped up in an unchristian form, but that which is at all times one of the most moving of all spectacles — the human spirit led to face in hours of gloom its relations towards the world and towards its God — struggling with the same problems that vex our souls, and feeling its way through a night of darkness to some measure at least of light and knowledge. We shall feel that we are listening to one of those of whom our Saviour said that 'they desired to see the things which we see, and did not see them.' [November 8, 1884.] LECTURE II. The Authorship and Age of Ecclesiastes. I SPOKE last week of some of the difficult — the exceedingly difficult, if exceedingly interesting — questions which would be forced on our attention before we could enter on any careful and continuous study of the Book of Ecclesiastes. These difficulties will meet us at every step, and you will forgive me if I ask you to look them with me in the face ; not to mask them, as it were, and so pass on. Tli£ _-^£ry- tit1e_£i£lhe book is obsc ure^ The Greek word, ' Ecclesiastes,' borrowed from the oldest translation of the Old Testament, is rendered in our version, under the guidance of Luther, by the English word, ' the Preacher,' and in those parts of the body of the book where it recurs presents itself always in this form. How far the Greek word itself admits of this transla- tion is questionable, and — what is more important still — the meaning of the Hebrew word which that Greek word represents is much disputed. _' Preacher.' ' Ecclesia§t£§,' ' Koheleth ' — a mist hangs round all these forms of its title. The^mithorship too of the book, and its date, are questions on which, as we shall see, competent critics come to the most conflicting conclusions. Again, its very form is con- tested. Is it prose or poetry .? ' Genuine poetry,' says one of the very greatest of Hebrew scholars \- ' pure prose, rising at times into poetry,' say, more plausibly at least, others of scarcely less authority. And again, is it, whether prose or poetry, a dramatic discussion, like the ' Two Voices ' of our own poet ? Or is it a medley of conflicting, loosely ordered, ' Ewald, Kohelet, 1837. 11.] Authorship and Age. 15 thoughts which Providence, or accident, has preserved ? Or is it a collection — deliberately made — of scattered sayings of wisdom ? Or a somewhat incoherent, if inspired, medita- tion on human life ? Or is it a systematic and philosophical treatise on the Supreme Good? or a Christian sermon under a thin disguise ? On all these points there is, as I reminded you last week, the greatest possible divergence of opinion and of judgment. And when we come to the question of questions , the true substance, and real aim and teaching, of the book, the discord, as I also reminded you, is even more baffling. Some views, current in quite modern literature, I have already indicated. The author, w e have been lately told o n high authority ^,Js a sceptic , a sceptic pure and simple, who questions everything, and while nominally letting drop a few respectful and traditional phrases as to the existence and power of God, utterly disbelieves in His control of, or His care for, human affairs; has no belief at all in a future life ; and questions these things, not with the passionate pleading of the Psalmist or of Job, but quite calmly : not grovelling in the dust, not crying for the light ; but ju st looking (it is said) at the riddles of life, 'shrugging his shoulders,' and saying there is no. solution. Vanitas vanitatum. ' All is vanity.' What then is, in this view, his practical teaching ? It is that, we are told, of a cultivated Epicurean, who discourages all zeal on one side, all excess on the other. Be not righteous over much, he says, in so many words, neither be over much wicked"^. He is, in the eyes of a countryman of Talleyrand, a very Talleyrand transferred from the sphere of Diplomacy to that of Religion, and warning us against zeal above all things. Do not waste time on ideals. Better, he says in so many words, the sight of the eyes than the wandering of desire^. It is vain to set yourself to do battle with the wrongs of life. That which is crooked, he warns us, cannot be ^ Renan, I'Ecclesiaste, 1882. * vii. 16, 17. ' vi. 9. 1 5 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [ii. made straighf^. Besides, ivho knoweth, he asks, what is good /or man in his vain life which he spendeih as a shadow"' ? The evils of life are incurable — make the best of them. Government is rotten to the core ; you will see, he says, justice and judgment perverted ; but what then ? — on the side of the oppressors^ he urges, is power ^. Society is corrupt throughout, Folly is set in great dignity* ; Bread is not to the wise, nor riches to men of understanding ^. But then kings, who are the crown and summit of this organized rottenness and corruption, are, he sees, very powerful beings. Who may, he asks in so many words, who may say unto them, what doest thou ^ ? Curse not the king, therefore, even in thy thought ; nor the rich even in thy chamber'' . You cannot fore- see or affect the future; mayi knoweth not that which shall be^. Old age, if you live to it, is mere life in death ; the grave will end all. The dead, he says, know not anything. Fame, too, is a mere illusion : The memory of them is forgotten ^ What then ? Take freely that one gift of which you can be sure, the enjoyment of the moment ; not the foolish excess which will defeat its own end, not the devotion of your life to the constant pursuit of pleasure, which experience has taught me, the Wise Man, will end in disappointment, but the moderate enjoyment of that which is within your reach. And this, we are confidently told, is the whole teaching of the book. But to others the preacher goes even beyond this. He may be in one sense a Fatalist , a Sceptic , an Epicurea n ; but these things lie on the surface. He is at heart something more than either. He is, so far as was possible in the age in which he lived, what in modern phrase we should call a professed and unflinching pessimist . By this we mean what .? Just this, that he holds — let us state it clearly — that human existence is in itself, as compared with non-existence, a pure ^ vii. 13. ^ vi. 12. 2 iv. I. * X. 6. ^ ix. 11. * viii. 4. "^ X. 20. * viii. 7. * ix. 5. II.] Authorship and Age. ' 17 evil. He is in entire sympathy with those who even now assert that the highest type with which we are acquainted of that mysterious entity which we call life, viz. the human organism as seen in civilized and cultivated man, is neces- sarily burdened with a weight of pain in full proportion to its complexity and development. The higher, therefore, that type rises in the scale of being, the sadder is its lot ; the greater and more pressing the consciousness of a growing want of correspondence between itself and the conditions under which it has to work out its existence, between, in the phrase of to-day, ' the organism and its environment.' He echoes, we are told, or anticipates almost precisely, the very words of the Greek poet, that fiol to be born at all is best 0/ all, but failing this, that death is better than life^. And this is no passing cry, like those wrung from Job by piercing agony : such as, ' Man is born to sorrow as the sparks fly upward.' No ! it is the slowly formed and deliberate judgment of one who is represented as having coldly sounded the depths of philosophical enquiry, and watched with careful eyes the whole round of human experience. Therefore I hated life "^j he says as the result, and again, / praised the dead that are already dead more than the living which are yet alive ^. And again, the day of death is better than the day of ones birth*. It is an evil world, he tells us ; madness is in mens hearts while they live, aiid after that they go to the dead ^ ; or again, there is one event, one end, to all, to the righteous and to the wicked^. It may be well to find, for those who can accept them, some temporary alleviations for the malady of life in such moderate enjoyment as the hour may bring. But the only true cure is death, and the one lesson impressed on him by the spectacle of nature and by the calm study of life is the hollowness of all things — the bankruptcy of human ' iv. 2, 3 ; Soph. aid. Col. 1225. ^ ii. 17. ' iv. 2. * vii. I. <> ix. 3. ^ ix. 2. C 1 8 Lectures on Ecclesiastcs. [ii. hopes, and the worthlessness of all man's aspirations, Vaniias vanitatum — all indeed is vanity. Such are the views which have been, which are, taken by no mean students of the book. I need hardly say that if they are correct, if we have nothing to say against them or beyond them ; if they are the last word, the final verdict of a fair and scientific criticism, then we may be well amazed at finding in our Bibles a book which not only makes faith and religion things absolutely impossible, but robs human life of every aim, and takes away from it every ground on which we can build any stable morality. In its own sad words, ' All indeed is vanity.' For the Bible, we must remember is emphatically a religious book. It is this, if it is anything at all. It is not placed in our hands to teach us philosophy, or science, or even history in itself It deals with one subject, the relation of man to God and of God to man. What place is there in such a book for a writer who treats all such relations as an empty dream ? I have indicated some of the questions, the somewhat startling questions, it may seem, into which the study of this book must lead us. Let me speak now of the vexed question of its authorship, and of the age in which it saw the light. You will understand me if I decline to pass on and leave the subject untouched. Who is this ' Preacher,' if Preacher we may call him, whose words have found such strange and manifold interpretations.'' The answer will at first sight seem obvious. Though Solomon is not mentioned by name, as he is in the opening words of the Book of Proverbs and of the Song of Songs, though indeed the direct mention of his name seems carefully avoided, yet he is clearly indicated by the words of the first verse of chapter i, in which the writer speaks of himself as the son of David, and by verse 2, in which he adds, that he 7vas king over Israel in Jerusalem ; as also by the language of verse 16, and again of chapter ii, in which he speaks of his II.] Authorship and Age. 19 wisdom and his wealth as having surpassed those of all his predecessors, strange as the expression doubtless is, of all that zvere hfore me in Jerusalem^. Whatever the cause of the suppression of the name, the person indicated is clearly that of Solomon. And in addition to this, the statement, direct or indirect, of the book itself, we have the unanimous acceptance of the authorship of Solomon by all Hebrew and all Christian writers down to a comparatively recent period. There is, no doubt, evidence that, so late as the close of the first century after the Christian era, there was some hesitation in the minds of the leaders of the Jewish Church, if not as to the admission of the book to what we call the sacred canon, yet certainly as to ranking it at all on a level with its most honoured portions. St. Jerome, again, tells us that the Jews of his day were keenly offended at the tone of its teaching. More than one of the great Jewish writers has put on record the offence caused him by isolated verses. It is quite true also that no portion of the book is alluded to or quoted, either in the New Testament or by the earliest writers of the Christian Church. But of any doubts as to its being a genuine work of Solomon we hear nothing. And it is urged that to call in question its authorship, and to refer its com- position to a later date, is simply to brand it as the work of a forger; it is to substitute for Solomon an untruthful personator, pretending at the very threshold that his work is something which it is not; snatching, in fact, at a great name, in order to give his utterances an influence which they would not of themselves obtain. Nay, some writers go much further than this. We have no right, they tell us, to enter on such a question. The critical study of the Bible is more than permissible, they say, is useful, so long as it confines itself to clearing away difficulties and elucidating the sacred text. But the moment that it takes upon itself to question by its own ' ii. 7, 9- c 2 20 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [il. light any statement whatever made in Holy Scripture, it becomes at once a purely destructive agency, antagonistic and fatal to all faith. You can no more trust such critics, we are told, than you could trust a dishonest workman, who, when employed to clean and scour a sea-going ship, bored holes through her ribs and did his best to scuttle her. That Solomon wrote the Book of Ecclesiastes is, it is urged, a fact plainly and incontestably revealed on the authority of God's Word. If the statement suggests difficulties or doubts, they are either to be regarded as trials of our faith, or as the suggestions of fanciful and malignant critics. To treat them seriously is to involve ourselves in questions of incalculable issue ; and to look on the authorship of this book as an open question tends directly to sap the very foundations, not of the Hebrew Scriptures only, but of the Christian religion^ I have put the view which I have stated in the strongest light possible, using the very language of its foremost up- holders. I may say at once that I entirely dissent from it ; nay, that I think its whole tone one against which Christians who value truth themselves, and feel sympathy with everyone to whom truth is dear, are bound emphatically to protest. The same arguments, fairly carried out in another direction, would have kept Galileo in his prison, consigned, it may be, Newton to the stake. The truths on which we Christians rest in Hfe and death are not bound up with these questions of the authorship, or the age, of the work which we are about to study. We find men to whom these truths are incon- ceivably dear, men who are the very foremost champions of the essential truths of the Gospel against those who dispute them, fully agreeing with their adversaries, and with each other, that it is impossible that this book, whose canonicity they fully admit, was written by Solomon, or for centuries later. We find one after another of the greatest Hebrew scholars of the last two generations — of the age, remember, ^ The Authorship of Ecclesiastes. Macmillan & Co., 1880. II.] Authorship and Age. 21 at which such questions have received their first full dis- cussion — coming to the same conclusion. Can we refuse to give their arguments respectful consideration? In the first place, such men repudiate at once the word ' forgery ' as applied to the question of authorship. The book, they say, is not a forgery, any more than certain books of ancient authors, such as Plato or Cicero, or of modern poets, deserve the name. It is a dramatic personation by one who, born in a dark and gloomy hour of his nation's existence, and moved and stirred by a voice within to put before his countrymen certain views of the world and of life, chose the title of the king, around whose memory clustered innumerable associations as the great sage and philosopher of the Hebrew race ; one whose name had become the very type of human wisdom combined with human sadness and frailty. The very form, it is added, in which his memory, so sad on one side, so glorious on the other, is evoked from the darkness of the past, points to a dramatic rather than historical use. His name is avoided, and he speaks in the words, not ' I a?n King,' as the actual Solomon of the Book of Kings must necessarily have done if writing in his life-time, but rather as a spirit called up from the world of shades, and speaking centuries after his decease. I zvas king, he says, over Israel ; the phrase itself, in spite of all attempts to explain it, points rather to the traditions which spoke of Solomon as stripped by the Evil One of his royal dignity, robbed of his mystical ring, and wandering from place to place a discrowned and needy vagrant, with the sad cry, / was king i?i Jerusalem, than to the recorded facts of sacred history. It is added that the scaffolding of the age of Solomon is only erected at the entrance of the work. It disappears wholly before the end of the second chapter, and we pass erelong into another atmosphere — an age of satraps and spies, and bad government, and formal religion, and incipient Pharisaism, and incipient asceticism ; an age of 23 Lectures on Ecclesiastcs. [ii. general misery, oppression, and corruption. Indeed, the whole_ a rgume nt as to the authorship of Snin mnn Hqa jj^t in a phrase here, or a word there, but in lhe_iYliole 4€xtiire~Q£.^ the_ book. There is, first, that on which it is impossible for us here to form or pronounce any independent opinion at all. The JgLBg^ilgg is sajd_to^be^satupj£jd_^yjtlLjg'ter Hebrew. If it is not as different from that of the older writers, as e.g. the Eng- lish of Cowper from that of Chaucer, yet the difference is said to be one quite similar in kind. If, says a great authority, a Christian Hebraist of unimpeached orthodoxy, ' if the book of Ecclesiastcs was written in the age of Solomon, there is ?io history of the Hehreiv language \' Such statements are, I need not say, of great weight. Their weight, of course, depends upon their accuracy ; and they are questioned and even strongly denied. Yet I am bound to say that those who question or deny them are, so far as I can ascertain, men who look with a dismay, which I for one do not for one moment share, at the possible result or results of holding the author to be one of a far later date. Independent students — those who are both competent and anxious to give an opinion on language as such, with no ulterior view, looking, as you and I would do, to truth and truth only — seem to me to be more and m ore coming to one conclusion; and I have nowhere f ound an y suggesTIon that the whole tf'vfj-miijinspH originally in a mnre nndent,ioigi_of^th^ Hebrew tongue, bears traces of having been recast and modernised. But behind the question of language, there lies another argument into which you and I can entirely enter, and which, I confess, seems to me to be of the greatest possible weight and_ jnt£i£sL— Xet us forget entirely the style of the lebrew in the original text, its inflexions, structure, syntax, on which scarcely more than one or two here, perhaps, are ^ Delitzsch. II.] Authorship and Age. 23 competent to judge. Let us consider something else, its , contents , its to ne, the local colouring, the ligh ts and shades /aw'TX^ of the age at which he speaks, _the scenery which we see in ^ the backgroHTiTt^^l Iehind the speaker as weJLslfiiL t o him. What shall we see ? Weariness, satiety, hatred of life, a low estimate of his fellow-men and fellow-women — a pro- found melancholy. Well ! these are natural enough in a king old before his time, who had tasted all the pleasures of life, and found the after-taste very bitter. Yes, that is possible, no doubt. But it is surely strange that the son of David, he who in his early youth had been so near and dear to his father's God, shou ld have no word to say, not one wor d, as he recounts the story of his life , of h is own early love to God and to his people, a love which comes out so beautifully in tTie BoolTof Kings. / am but a little child, he had said once, and hozv shall I judge this great people^ ? He had asked once not for riches, nor for power, but for wisdom. And you remember the striking words, Because thou hast not asked for thyself long life, nor riches for thyself nor the life of thine enemies .... lo, I have given thee a wise and understanding hearf^. Is it he who in this book holds so cheap the wisdom so freely given, and has no word either of gratitude to the Giver, or of memory or sense that it came from Him? Of re pentance ,_or even of regrgt for his falling. . away, he makes no sign. _ He represents himself as having attained to his marvellous height of wisdom, by his own toil and researches, and this in the deliberate carrying out of a cool and calculating philosophic experiment. Is it too much to say that, if it is I'^nlnmnn who «;ppak<;, \\ k q f^nl^m pn who has fo rgotten his own ^past life, alike its good side a nd_Jts__ ,_evil ? it is no longer Solomon, the righteous judge; nor Solomon, the builder and dedicator of the Temple, which he does not even enumerate among his great works, and of which he will speak as you or I might speak to-day of this or ^ I Kings iii. 7, 8, 9. ^ i Kings iii. 11, 12. 24 Lectures on Ecclcsiastes. [11. of any long-established place of worship. Nor, again, is it Solomon the worshipper, or the sanctioner of the worship, of false Gods. It is one who has forgotten both characters. It_is a Solomon in a state of mental eclipse, una ble to recall the pastin _any colou r but that which the present lendsjt. irSolomon is here at all, it is another Solomon than he whom we find in the sacred record. But thi s is only one of many arguments. The Solomon of sacred history ruled, till his death, over a great and prosperous empire. His portrait, as painted there, is not that of an artistic and philosophical builder of stately palaces, as one of many experiments in the process of satisfying the selfish, self-inspecting, cravings of his own restless soul. It is that of a great and statesmanlike ruler of men, the shaper under God of a young nation's destinies. Art and commerce sprang into life at his touch. His people felt the blood of a fresh national life thrill within their veins. Wealth flowed into the land. Silver and gold, we read, were as stones in the streets of Jerusalem. Material prosperity grew, to use a well-known phrase, by leaps and bounds. Foreign potentates sought his alliance. Far-off" lands sent him their treasures. Thp piVtnrp \r\ \\\(- 'RonT^ nf King'^ is^__Q^rhaps^ the verybrightest pictur e of na tional prospe rity which sacred^ or profane writer has ev e r placed on re cord. Judah and Israel, we read, dwelt safely, every man under his vine and under his fig-tree, from Dan even unto Beersheha, all the days of Solomon ^. We know that there was a reverse side to the picture; that tribal jealousies still existed; that the devout were alienated by the introduction of foreign worship ; that a sumptuous court, and a king's eagerness in pressing on great national works, involved heavy burdens and popular disaff'ection. And we know how the magnificent fabric of his empire broke up, when the great king was hardly cold in his grave. Bu t the picture which the Preacher will dra win ' I Kings iv. 25. II.] Authorship and Age. 25 these chapters is one which it is almost impossible to fit into "the age of Solomon. It is unrelieved by a single touch of patriotism, or of national or of kingly feeling of any kind. Kings are spoken of; but it is as powerful personages to be in every way dreaded and propitiated. ,^^altj^is_treated_as_ a regular, necessary, long-established institution. It is appa- rently reg'afded with no very friendly eye. The writer will speak, as it were, under his breath, and in language not always easy to decipher. But he will speak as one who has groaned under the misrule of an Oriental despotism, with its succession of low-born and corrupt favourites ; its spies in every chamber ; its ubiquitous police ; its insecurity of pro- perty and life; its arbitrariness; its shameful luxury; its corrupt and unjust judges. The Solomon of history left behind him the enduring fame of a righteous judge. With all his faults, he imprinted on his nation's heart the ideal of a national and a beneficent sovereign. His race loved to con- nect with his namej he nLaginificentpicture^f-the perfectjCirig which still canstirjnir hearts Jike a trumpet as we^read the 72ndPs alm. Could such a Solomon have spoken, as the speaker in this book will speak, with a melancholy resignation, the resignation of calm despair, of the place of judgment being filled by wickedness^ ; of the tears of the oppressed, who had no comforter ^ ; ox of power being always 07i the side of the oppressor ? Would he have spoken of slaves being set on horseback, and princes degraded^ ; recalling some scene out of the 'Arabian Nights,' or the revolutions of a Persian court? Would he have darkly hinted at satrap above satrap *, making appeal for redress useless ? Would he, in short, have written verse after verse of latent satire on some worn-out and corrupt, yet still for the present irresistible system of op- pression ? Was the Turkish administration of yesterday or to-day possible, as a living and present fact, to even the poetic imagination of an actual Solomon ? * iii. 16. 2 iv. I. 3 X. 7. * V. 8, z6 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [ii. And a gain, was the ques tio n that will recu x_ again and again as w e read these chaptgrs, the quegtioii-of the sad tnequalTties, an d anomalie s; and_mjustices, oLhugian-Iifei^- \ver^~lHese'~melancholy outlooks into human history — this hopeless view of the organization of society and of the /S A government of the world — this recurring abandonment of any n •v^'t^ prospect of redress, — were these things natural, _po ssible, in ^^ ffi/iN th e interval between the gl ow:Lng. hQppful..Jrus tful Psalm s of Q/(/^^ ^ 'J~Pavid, an d the zeaj _andJgiY.Qur of Ihe- JIehr£iy_PrQpliets ? Is there room jn_thejjeigni)i Solomon^ for this blank era of profo und a.nd _pajsionless_despaij; ? this forgetfulness of the very existence and position of the Jewish nation ? this indif- ference to its past, this deadness to its future ? Do such problems, we might almost ask, as are dealt with in this book, speak to men, have any meaning to men, in the first heyday of a nation's youth ? above all to the Jewish nation, while still fired with high hopes, and led onward by the felt presence of its God towards the greatness for which it panted ? To me it seems, I confess, impossible to read verse after verse that will come before us without feeling that they have ' - ^ l ittle or no meaning unless w e 1nnk nn tbprn as thf; outcom e ^ ^ of a time of suffering and oppression. T hey seem to po int 'T a/ Steadily to anagewhenj national freedom was g one, national life r/-'* extinguished for a time ; the spirit of freedom dead ; the high memories of the past forgotten ; the Messianic hopes not yet rekindled ; when the God of Hosts seemed far removed ; when all around was dark and gloomy ; jn^daySj_it may bej_ _ w hen Persian or Syrian or Egy ptian kings juled over the land of David as a provinc e of their kingd om, and the hopes of Isr ael seemed dead and gone^buried and out of sig ht. Then, it might well come to pass that the spirit of some son of Israel was stirred within him — in a time when the writing and the reading of books was, as we see by one of the closing verses \ a familiar thing — to try to reach his II.] AutJiorsJiip and Age. 27 people's heart, not by spoken word or the stirring address of a Jewish prophet ; the day of prophecy was over : not by the music of a Psalm ; the Psalmist's harp was silent : not by a great poem like the Book of Job — such poetry had died out of the nation's heart ; but by putting forth in this half-inarticulate and ambig iious form a soliloquy or dis- c ourse, call it which you will, b r eathi ng th ^veiy spirit qf_ ^hat_j ater age : its ^sadness, its languor^ its passive and 0£iental_acc[uiescence, almost lethargy, under suffering. It bears the ataiQEi. from first to last, of dejection, if not of despair. Yet its still unrelinquished, pervading sense of the fear of God as the end of life ; its firm hold of the inherent distinction between right and wrong ; its refusal, in spite of all that seems to cloud the hope, to part with the conviction of a judgment, a righteous judgment, yet to come ; its counsels of activity, patience, cheerfulness, prudence, calm- ness, sympathy with suffering, stand out amidst the wreck and decay of all around. They stand out often in sharp contrast with what seemg_at_times the' prevailing toi;e_ot the book Itself. It is easy to quote, as we shall see, opposite precepts, conflicting views : scepticism and faith, pessimism and optimism, gloom and brightness, despair and hope. There they stand side by side, and we shall unders tand, as we read them, ho w it is tha t, in the enormous literature that haa_ gathe red r ound these few pages .of the Old Testament, there„ is the projoundest disagreement as to their aim and purpose,. We, my friends, will do our best to reach the true meaning of the Preacher's words. We will not attempt to disguise their sombre and despairing side. We will try to realize to the very full the loss of belief in human progress, the eclipse of any sense of a God close at hand to aid, such as nerved the Psalmist, or near at hand to guide, such as fired the Prophet. We will face these things fairly and honestly, not wresting the pl ain meaning qL the -PreacJier^,. words, or fastening on a phrase here, a line there, and saying^_^ *• 28 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. be hold we have in him a Preacher, be fore his tijne, of_ Christian doctrines, or an anticipator of modern science, or a professor of Christian theology, or a revealer of the life and Tmmortality ^hich were brought to light by Christ. But we win try, reverently and honestly, to reach the meaning, the real meanin g, of the Preacher ; to catch what higher teaching God's Spirit still kept alive within his heart; and faithfully and heedfully to ask what his place can be in that Sacred Record, to study a fragment of which we have met to-day. To Him whose education of our race is revealed in that great Record, to the God of Truth, would we consecrate our efforts. His help and blessing we would seek ! [November 15, 18S4.] LECTURE III. The Prologue. Chapter I. 2-1 1. I SAID enough, when last I spoke here, to indicate the view that will be taken of the authorship and age of the book which we are studying. I jhall presume that we have in it a late, perhaps the very latest, portion of t he Old Testament canon ; and that the book was written, not in^thejpalmy days of the empire of Solomon, but at a time when the Jewish people, once so full of aspirations to universal empire, always so intolerant of foreign supremacy, was lying beneath the yoke of Persian or Egyptian or Syrian kings ; when the Holy Land had become a province, or department, ruled by some Eastern satrapj an^ suffering from the rapacity and corruption inherent at all_^ times in such government. And I shall presume that at such a time, one, who shared to the^mosTlRFgloom'and^defection'orKis race, was moved to come forward to bear his part in some interchange of^ t hought between his ow n sad_squl and ._those to whom the darkness of that hour was a 'darkness that inight be felt.' I shall assume also that he clothed Jiis words in the person of the great head an d_ representative of Hebrew wisdom, aii3" " I shall glance from time to time at any eyidence that j)oints_ to this.jde!A'. of the. date and^origin of the book. And, if this view is at all correct, it will suggest at once some answer to the grave question as to thejgl ace which the book holds i ri_the education and spiritual d&velopment of the human race. The question will come before us again and ^A^^-iyU-i 30 Lectures on Ecclcsiastes. [iii. again as we study its contents. But I would answer at once that i t seems to me to represent_that stage jn the history of di e chosen people when the m oral and spirijual fervour, with which the sons of Abraham had been instinct without a parallel in the his tory of the world, had died out under^_the_ "^stern pressure of overwhelming ad versjly. It was, we may believe, a time when the early and simpler belief that obedience to God's law and outward prosperity must neces- sarily go together, a belief long rudely shaken, had passed away ; \vhen_t he very a go ny w hich jts disturbance had caused, as figured in the passionate cries of Job, had give n place to calm despair ; it is the hour when the prophet's cry, ' Verily, Thou art a God that hidest Thyself^' had become the expression of something more than a momentary pang; when all that Judaism offered, had it been a final dispen- sation, seemed exhausted, and the light that was to shine into the darkness had not yet dawned. Jt is the chill and gloom i n the sick man's chamber before the first breeze of morning stirs, or the first beam^ of^ dawn glimmers in the east. Be this as it may, I will now invite you all alike : you who cannot perhaps part with the conviction that we have here the moody voice of the kingly Solomon, anticipating in the full pulse of the nation's youth the gloom and despondency of its sadness and decline ; and you who can accept with me the confessedly modern, but as it seems to me the more probable view, that we have in it the voice of jonie_iaember- of t he Jewish Church, s t irred in. a ^r Jater age to give utter- ance tojhe_thoughtsJJbatAYorked:ffiithin hinijn days of dec a- dence anddecayj^ I will invite you, each and all, to turn to iti~Tnstructive pages, and to study with me, so far as the occasional obscurity of its language will permit, these strange and tangled meditations which paint so well the darker side * Isaiah xlv. i;. III.] The Prologue. Ch. i. 3-ti. 31 of human life, and the gloom of the individual spirit ; the need, let me add, to both alike of a Consoler and Restorer. Let us begin at once with his opening words, Vanity of VANITIES, saith the Preacher, Vanity of vanities : all is VANITY. He strikes at once the key note to a vein of thought, never retracted, never wholly overborne, that will recur again and again as we follow him in his musings. Listen to the stately and solemn accents in which he clothes his thoughts in what we may call the Prologue to his sad soliloquy. He begins in verse 2, Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities : all is vanity. There is his text. What profit hath a man — hath man — of all his labour tvhich he taketh under the snn ? There is man the toiler. Then he looks at man as face to face with nature. Listen to him through the next five verses. O^ie generation passeth away and another generation cometh : but the earth abideth for ever. The snn also ariseth, and the sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose. The wind- goeth iotvard the south, and turneth about unto the north ; it whirleth about contifiually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits. All the rivers run into the sea ; yet the sea is not full ; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again. All things are full of labour ; man cannot utter it ; the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled tvith hearing. In the ninth verse he turns to man, as looked on in the light of history. The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be ; and that which is done is that which shall be done : and there is no new thing under the sun. Is there any thing whereof it is said. See, this is neiv ? it hath been already of old time, which was before us. There is no remembraiice of former thiftgs ; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come im'th those that shall come after. Such are the lines of profound and unbroken melancholy — of more than melan- choly, of weariness and despair — with which the book opens. Everything on earth, everything without exception, is hollow 33 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [in. and empty — man's labour, and man himself, most of all. The sight of nature and the study of history are alike stale, flat, wearisome, and unprofitable. Shall we take his words in hand, and say ' such language cannot mean what it says ? ' Shall we set to work to explain it away, and write into each dismal verse some pious senti- ment, or some Christian doctrine } Shall we imagine ourselves by such a process to be doing honour to what we read, by making its language mean something wholly different from, or precisely contrary to, its plain significance .? We turn to commentators, Jewish and Christian, and we find ourselves in quite another atmosphere to that which broods around the speaker. Words have lost their meaning ; sighs are no longer sighs ; despair is no more despair ; the saddest utterances of the human heart have become merely sparkling and ingenious riddles. Our ears are filled with hollow verbi- age, fictitious sorrows, artificial moans, assumed dejection. Let me give you at once one or two instances of the manner in which this ' exceeding deep and bitter ' moan has been dealt with for centuries. That ' all things ' — all without exception — ' are vanity ' means, we shall be told at once, nothing more than the pious maxim that without God's blessing nothing human will avail. That ' all man's toil beneath the sun is profitless ' means, says a great Christian Father ^ that work done for ourselves is profitless, but work done for Him Who made the sun, and Who is above the sun, is fruitful. That ' gene- rations pass and the earth abides ' teaches us, says the Jewish Rabbi, that the proud and the wicked are overthrown at last, and the poor and the meek, whom they have trodden beneath their feet as men tread on earth, will in the end be raised up, and survive their oppressors. The sun that rises and sets, and rises again, is not, says the same Christian expositor, the sun that marches through the natural heaven, but the ^ St. Augustine. III.] The Prologue. Allegorical Interpretations. 33 Sun of Righteousness ; and we have here a prophecy of the coming nativity, of the Death, and Burial, and Resurrection, and Ascension of Christ our Lord. Those streams that flow for ever to the ocean, the brooks that murmur seawards, and suggest to the saddened consciousness of this weary watcher the thought, common to that age with this, that as 'men come and go ' they will * flow on for ever,' are only mentioned, we are told, to remind us that, as those sweet rivulets are lost at last in the wandering fields of barren brine, so guilty joys and sensual pleasures must needs end at last in everlasting bitterness. That ' there is no new thing under the sun ' is not the weary groan of a soul, to which all the history of the past has lost its savour : it is merely a phrase used to convey to us the very narrow and misleading, but by no means novel or unfamiliar maxim, that outside the sacred record we shall find no solid or instructive teaching in the story of our race. That as the past is forgotten, so the memory of the present will fade and perish, is merely a mode of saying that as one guilty and rebellious race, such as Amalek, has been already exterminated, so those which share its guilt will in due time meet the doom which they deserve. Need I go on ? I have not, you will believe, paused in what is far more interesting, to read to you these character- istic interpretations, merely to excite a smile, but with a deliberate purpose. For whole centuries, Jew and Christian vied with each other in dealing with the whole of this book in a similar manner, and the result was two-fold. First, all the difficulties, all the problems, which the book stirs, were effectually disposed of. Does the writer seem to say that all God's world is wholly evil ? Or, further on, that the gift of life itself is not a blessing, but a curse, * a life of nothings ; nothing worth ? ' The answer is ready. It is only the evil in the world of which he speaks. It is only the life of the wicked which is so full of pettiness and full of misery. Does he speak, as speak he will, of man and beast D 34 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [iii. lying down to die alike ? He merely means that beast-like men, the creatures of their senses, can have no part in the true life hereafter. Does he seem to bid us ' eat and drink ' cheerfully, ' for to-morrow we die ? ' He is, in fact, in words beyond his age, bidding the Christian use freely the unspeak- able gift of the blessed Sacrament of Communion with his Lord. In short, all that is startling, all that is perplexing — I had almost said, all that is characteristic — in his language, is merely a flimsy veil. It is assumed to hide something very different, the ordinary truisms, the habitual, we might almost say the conventional, teaching of a pious reciter of trite and well-worn religious maxims. The ' Preacher' is not a voice out of the dark pre-Christian night, but just one more Preacher, in not the highest or most honoured sense of the word. ' There is nothing new under the sun,' there is cer- tainly nothing new to us in this somewhat tame and common- place discourse. And secondly, all the real interest, as well as all the real difficulty, of the book evaporates under such treat- ment. This moody soliloquy, these heart-stirring con- fessions, these riddling utterances, running through the various forms of despairing reflections, cheerful encourage- ment, worldly and prudential maxims, political aphorisms, religious warnings ; wearing at one time the guise of earnest but troubled prose, where we seem to see language struggling to convey thoughts too big for its framework, at another rising to the sad heights of the poetry of despair ; this book, of which it was said long ago that it had no companion, no fellow, in the whole Bible, becomes merely a storehouse of well-contrived riddles, where homely truths, great, some of them, in their naked simplicity and dignity, lose their force by being wrapped up in meaningless conundrums. The book becomes no longer a serious study for earnest men, but a pastime for grown-up children, a playground for trifling pedants. III.] The Prologue. Ch. \. 2-11. 35 Let us put away, once for all, this mode of treatment, and come back to these opening words, stern and grim and forbidding as they seem. We will do this in the conviction that they come too clearly from the speaker's heart to be ex- plained away ; that he is in too serious a frame for trifling ; that whatever be the desolation of his mood, one thing at least he can do — he can say what he means, and mean what he says. He looks out then, in verse 3, on this busy human race — busy then, busier, it may be, now. We too can think of a toiling world, larger than he dreamed of; those patient Hindoos, these thrifty Frenchmen, those weary Fellaheen, those laborious Chinese, these masses at our own doors; the hum and roar of machinery on this side the Atlantic and on that ; these toiling millions, this incessant drudgery ; the industrial triumphs, the feverish haste, the eager thought, the philanthropic, the missionary zeal of our own place and time. What profit, he asks, hath man from all his toil, that he toils (so runs the Hebrew) beneath the sun ? What profit ? what result ? In Hebrew, even more than in English, the question suggests its own sad answer. But the Preacher is not content with this gloomy question, or with the reply that it challenges. He pursues the theme unrelentingly. Generations, he says, in the fourth and fol- lowing verses, come and go ; their lives die out like fading sparks. Generation passeth away, and getieratioticomeih. They pass, but the earth abideth ; the earth, and dumb unchanging Nature. The unwearied sun pants, he says in his own language, through his daily round, unmoved by the wreck of human lives. The winds revolve and circle and shift and blow with a hateful monotony of change. What to them we seem to hear him say, those stormy seas and cruel tornados, those ' sinking ships and praying hands ' ? Downwards from their unexhausted sources flow the streams through time-worn channels to a changeless sea, a sea whose shores are strewn with the wrecks of empires. All nature B 2 ^6 Lectures on Ecclcsiastes. [iii. tells of this weary, unvarying round. No tongue^ he says, in verse 8, can tell, no eye can see, no ear can catch, the full range of this depressing, self -repealing, etidless cycle. There is no advance, no progress. And the page of History tells the same tale. He sees no onward movement there ; no evolution or development in Nature, no ' one increasing purpose running through the ages,' in the story of mankind. It is the same tale, stirring, it might be, if it stood alone, dulled and blunted and made tame by incessant repetition. There is nothing new, nothing great. All that is human repeats itself, and sinks into the great gulf of oblivion and decay. The earth abides, the sun rises, the rivers run, the winds blow, the sea rolls, man lives his brief day, and dies ; all things are forgotten ; the earth abides. Vanity of vanities : all is vanity. It is a dreary world ! Can anything in the world be sadder than his mood ? What a gap we feel at once between such language and the Psalmist's exulting joy in nature : The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament sheweth His handiwork'^ ; his words who sees the sun going forth as a bridegroom, and rejoicing as a strong man to run a race; or his who, after looking round on creation, cries. Lord, how manifold are Thy works ; i?i wisdom hast Thou made them all; the earth is full of thy riches'^. What a difference from the language of the Shepherd King, as he pours out his full heart in gladness at the familiar sight of the starry heavens. They suggest to him, as well they may, his own insignificance. But they do not 'burn and brand his nothingness' into his soul. Whe7i I consider Thy heavens^, the work of Thy fingers, the moon and the stars which Thou hast ordaified ; What is man, that Thou art mindful of him .^ and the son of mayi, that Thou visitest him .^ * But for aU that,' he cries, ' Thou hast made man scarce less than divine ; Thou hast crowned Thy creature man with glory and with honour ; and for all that,' O Lord, our Lord, how excellent is Thy name in all the earth I Thou that hast set Thy j.^ lory above ^ Ps. xix. "^ Ps. civ. 24. ^ Ps. viii. III.] The Prologue. Ch. \. 2-1 1. 37 the heavens. What a difference also, if we turn to our own day, between his weary and bitter mood and that of the most mournful tones of modern poetry. Nature does not touch — does not seem to touch — and sadden him by the very sense of its unutterable and mysterious beauty. There is no trace of the ' pain of finite souls that yearn ' to something unapproach- able, unattainable. There is no echo of the feeling with which a Keats listened to the music of the nightingale, and sighed for ' easeful death.' There is none of that with which a Shelley lay down in the Bay of Naples, and, overborne by the contrast between the boundless loveliness around him and the want of peace within, called on the sea to ' breathe over his dying brain its last monotony.' The ' innocent brightness of a new-born day' that filled Wordsworth with a thoughtful joy, is to him mere weariness. The sunrise is no ' glorious birth,' but only a type of nature's dull, remorseless pulse, beating and beating through endless time, while men die out, decay, and are forgotten. Nor, on the other hand, does he read in nature what modern eyes have read, the stern and ruthless law working out the advancement of all organic life, through pain and suffering, through hunger, strife, and death. To him all creation is stationary, or revolves in an endless, weary, cruel, unmeaning circle. Or shall we pause for one moment to contrast his view of the felt meaninglessness of the history of mankind, of its dull flux and reflux, its weary ebb and flow, with that of the Psalmists of his race } I have considered the days 0/ old'^, says one of these, the years of ancient times. I will remember the works of the Lord, — The years 0/ the right hand 0/ the Most High, — of Him whose way is in the sea and whose path in the great waters. Who led His people like sheep by the hand of Moses and Aaroji ; Who was known to them by the title of ' The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob.' In him ',s;ho speaks to us to-day we see no interest in the •■ Ps. Ixxvii. 5, 10, 19, 20. 38 LecUires on Ecclesiastes. [in. past, no hope for the future. Of the two great factors in the life of Judaism, the inspiring memories of earlier days, and the eager anticipation of a greater day yet to come, we find, and we shall find, no trace. The child of a race from which, after the flesh, He was to be born under whom old things were to pass away, who was to make all things new^, he tells us that the story of his people has run its course, and has nothing fresh to offer; all changes have been rung; there is and will be nothing new. Such is the mood in which our Preacher meets us as we pass under the shadow of his teaching ; need I say that we feel the air around him thick and heavy ? Need I say that it is a mood fatal to all exertion, to all activity of an ennobling or uplifting kind? Enthusiasm, self-denial, high aspirations, earnest devotion to an unselfish cause ; the courage and the calmness that spring from the sense that no good work can ever wholly perish, and that the life of the soul that is in union with the Eternal Spirit will endure, when the earth has become a tenantless globe and the sun's fires are cold — these are plants that cannot grow in such a soil. They are incom- patible with such a frame of mind, with such a basis on which to build our lives. Yet we know that it is a mood, a frame, a state, a tem- perament, call it what we will, to which, in one form or another, the human soul is at all times liable. It is a malady of our very being, a sad prerogative of our nature — this pro- found, unappeasable, irresistible, mysterious melancholy, taking at times the form of a spiritual paralysis, a moral apathy ; this sense of unsatisfiedness, incompleteness on the one hand, and a turning from all that might fill the void on the other. * A grief without a pang, void, dark, and drear, A stifled, drowsy, nnimpassioned grief, Which finds no natural outlet, no relief In word, or sigh, or tear*.' ^ 2 Cor. V. 17. . * S. T. Coleridge. III.] The Prologue. Ch. i. 2-1 1. 39 Shall we, my friends, be so startled, so offended, that some place is found for such a mood, for such a frame, in that sacred book which traces the dealings with our spirits of the Father of all spirits ? Or shall we rather be thankful that, in the great record of the spiritual history of the chosen and typical race, some place should be kept for the sigh of defeated hopes, for the gloom of the soul vanquished by the sense of the anomalies and mysteries of human life ? It seems to me that we may well rejoice that, at a season which tells us of the coming of the great Consoler, we should be reminded not only of those wounds which He would have us try to heal or console, its diseases, its afflictions, its destitution, its ignor- ance, its misery, its open graves, its desolate hearts, but of its vaguer and more impenetrable sadness, to which we so often minister in vain. ' Come unto Mel He said, * all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest;' and he who speaks to us to-day was one of those who carried a heavy burden. The burden will grow heavier. He has shown us as yet but the twilight of his soul. His hour of midnight is yet to come. For him, also, and for those who in any measure feel, or have felt, with him, there is, be sure, a larger and a deeper sympathy than man can offer ; in even a wider sense than that of the Psalmist, the human spirit may say. Why art thou so full 0/ heaviness, oh my soul, and why so disquieted within me ? Put thy trust in God, for I will yet thank him, who is the help of my countenance and my God^. ^ Ps. xlii. II. [November 22, 1884.] LECTURE IV. The Title. Chapter I. 12 — II, ii. I COME back for a short space to-day to the few words with which the book opens; to that which, in a modern work, would form its title-page — to the first verse of Chap- ter I. The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in ferusalem. Of the second portion of that title-verse I have spoken already; I will now try to interest you for a few moments on what precedes it ; on the phrase, The words of the Preacher. ' The word here translated by ' The Preacher,' is one which will meet us no less than seven times in the twelve chapters which we have to consider. I have already reminded you that it is, in the original language, one and the same word as that to translate which the word Ecclesiastes has been borrowed by our translators from the Septuagint, or Greek translation of the Old Testament. The latter word has thus, though a purely Greek word, in rare use, and of not absolutely certain meaning, passed into familiar English usage. The two words then, you will remember, Ecclesiastes, used as the ordinary title, and the Preacher, which takes its place in the body of the work, are renderings of the same Hebrew word. And this Hebrew word, Koheleth, is itself a puzzle, an almost insoluble puzzle. It occurs nowhere else, and its meaning therefore can only.be inferred or conjectured from that of kindred words. It has been even suggested, and there is nothing alien to the analogy of later Hebrew literature in the theory, that it may have been coined by the writer to convey some enigmatic meaning, the key to IV.] Meaning of the Title. 4T which has been wholly lost. It is clearly a noun, or, to speak more accurately, a participle equivalent to a noun, de- rived from an existing verb. It is strangely enough a feminine noun, representing possibly, as do also our own feminine personifications of Truth, Justice, Charity, Temperance, Faith, an abstract idea rather than a definite person. But into these abstruse and subtle questions, as to the sometimes strange significance of feminine words in Hebrew and other languages, you will not, I am sure, care for me to enter. The Hebrew word is interpreted by many of the best authorities, as a gatherer or caller together, an assembler, or uniter of men. Hence it was that a term, signifying in his own tongue The Preacher, was chosen by Luther for his own great trans- lation. It was borrowed from him by our English translators. I need not remind you how familiar men were, in Germany and in England alike, at the era of the Reformation, with the power of preaching, of pronouncing, i.e. public discourses, before large gatherings of men and women, in spreading the revival, as in the first foundation, of Christian teaching. It is still, as we know, a power in the world. Yet we see at once that, as applied to this book, the term suggests perhaps somewhat too modern an image ; at all events that its language is hardly that of a spoken address on a religious subject to a popular audience, such as we connect with the idea of preaching. We can scarcely look on what we shall read as a sermon, or collection of short sermons. Indeed the writer seems at times deliberately to refuse to preach to us, to put aside the most marked opportunities for so doing. It would be out of place to enter further into a disquisition on so difficult a subject, on which no one can decide with certainty, and which would have little interest for many here. You will be content to take it, on the authority of others, that the Hebrew word, which gives its title to the book, is extremely obscure; but that the most prominent and most probable interpretations are, that it signifies ; 42 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [iv. First, and for this sense there seems to be much evidence, one who assembles an audience in order to address them, — a Lecturer, or, in a certain sense of the term, a Preacher. In this sense I shall venture to retain the word. Secondly, one who frequents, or lakes part in, such an assembly — a Debater or Discusser. Thirdly, one who unites a body of men not to each other, but to God ; indicating thus very closely a supposed purpose of the book, to reconcile God's people to their divine Lord — a Uniter or Reconciler. Fourthly, it is held that the word Koheleth bears, if I may be allowed to use the language of grammar, no longer an active, but a passive sense ; and that it signifies one who is reunited to God ; the Solomon, who has by many been sup- posed to be making in these chapters the recantation of his errors and the confession of his sins. Lastly, it has been held to mean nothing more than the Collector or Gatherer, not of men, but of truths ; to signify thus the various maxims, views, aphorisms, and thoughts, embodied in the work of which it is the title. I will go no further, though I might greatly enlarge the list of conflicting interpretations set before us by students of the Hebrew language. Yet it may interest you to have heard these five interpretations : the Preacher of our own version ; the Debater ; the Reconciler — these three are not, you will notice, for practical purposes, so very far apart — and, besides these, two wholly different, the Reconciled and the Collector. And it may interest you also, in connexion with these different views as to the meaning of the very title of the book, to indicate the main views which have been founded on that title as to its purpose and object. I need say no more of a theory which I have already put fully and fairly before you, that it is the work of one who, had he lived in the nineteenth century, would have not flinched from calling himself an avowed sceptic and pessimist. IV.] Meaning of the Title. 43 I set aside also those which regard it as a mere series of words, in themselves insignificant, but used as a veil for conveying in a string of enigmas a system of Jewish, or Christian, teaching quite apart from their apparent sense. But those who are content to let the author speak, as other authors, within or without the circle of inspired writers, are wont to speak, take in the main three different views of its contents and object, each implied in their translation of its title-page. For those to whom the word translated ' Preacher ' bears a sense answering to that of our ' Collector,' the book contains the thoughts, not of one man, but two or far more. It is a sort of dialogue or conference, recalling, as I said before, 'The Two Voices' of our own poet, Tennyson; and thus all that seems gloomy, or sceptical, or fatalistic, or epicurean, in the chapters before us, is easily ascribed to one or other of the unnamed interlocutors ; all that is of another character comes from one of firmer faith, who utters from time to time words of higher wisdom. Ingenious as is the view, and ready as is the solution which it seems to present to many of the difficulties of the book, I can find, I confess, no foundation whatever in its plan or structure for such a theory. To others, who lean rather to the view that 'the Preacher' is here one who is uniting his people to God, the title is taken as signifying the express purpose of the book. It is looked on as the attempt in dark and gloomy days of one who shares the darkness and the gloom, to lead his people to the dim light that still remains; to bid them not despair, but enjoy cheerfully what is given day by day, and trust in the certainty — the certainty in spite of all appearances to the contrary — of ultimate retribution. Doubtful as is this interpretation of the tide, its upholders have at all events seized on one leading feature of the book. Some, I need hardly say, carry its aim much higher. They 44 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [iv. speak of the book as written to cheer the heart of conquered and despairing Israel, by holding up to them the solution of all their doubts and difficulties in the hope of Immortality and of a judgment beyond the grave ; of a solution in another world — not here, but there — of all life's problems. By many also the book has been treated as the humble recantation of the penitent Solomon, now united and reconciled to the God whom he had abandoned. It has been spoken of as a ' dirge/ a penitential dirge over his errors ; an account of his wanderings to and fro in a search after happiness, and an attempt to point his people to the true source of rest and peace. It thus gives the history of his return from ' cisterns, broken cisterns that can hold no water,' to the one unfailing well-spring of wisdom and of happiness. If I may once more indicate my own view, I cannot for a moment look on the book as a dialogue: still less as an un- completed, unordered, medley of fragmentary and conflicting maxims. Nor, again, can I venture to speak to you of it as the outcome of a penitent and contrite spirit, as something to be taken to the very heart of Christendom, side by side with the 51st Psalm. Of repentance, of the sense of sin, of the yearning for forgiveness, I see no trace. Nor, again, can I accept the view that it is an essay or debate, however informal, on the nature of true happiness ; still less that it is a gracious revelation of Christian truths ; or an invitation to a life of ascetic self-denial ; or a contrast drawn between the hollow- ness of all that is seen and temporal, and the enduring nature of what is spiritual and eternal. I need hardly tell you that if I thought with a distinguished modern writer, whose facile pen has ranged through such a vast circle of the persons and subjects nearest and dearest to the heart of humanity, that it is merely an Epicurean essay, written by some cold-blooded forerunner of the Sadducee who was to come, on the hoUowness of everything except the moderated and calculated engagement of the passing hour; IV.] Aim of the Book. 45 and that it had somehow been permitted by blundering Rabbis to find a place in the Sacred Canon, I should not have attempted to draw your attention to it in this house, sacred to the worship of a God revealed to us in the Man of Sorrows. Need I say here once more that, whatever the meaning of this mysterious title, the book seems to me to paint in dark yet most instructive colours, an hour in the history of the pre-christian age when one great article in the simple creed of the early Jewish Church, its belief in a fully retributive system here below, had been shaken to its base ; shaken alike by the experience of a more complex stage of society, and by the crushing of God's people under heathen powers .-• Let any one here read on his return the 44th Psalm. He will see what clouds must have seemed to pass between God's face and the soul of the devout Hebrew. At such a time came a voice, evoking from the distant past the name of the great type and master of human wisdom, sharing all the gloom that had settled on the race ; echoing its deepest murmurs in accents of unsurpassable, immeasurable melancholy, and yet, as we shall find, seeing even behind the darkest clouds, some faint gleams of light ; repelling fanaticism on one side, denial of God on the other ; holding firm, even in the shipwreck of hope, to some fragments of cheerfulness, even in the bank- ruptcy of faith, to two things which contain the germ of all that is most precious to our race, the belief in God and the belief in Duty. Was it the last time in the history of mankind, that even these have been of priceless value ? Let us now follow the account which the writer gives from the twelfth verse onwards — gives, you will notice, in the person of one who speaks of himself as king, not in the present but in the past, over Israel, and that in Jerusalem, as though opposed to the Northern Kingdom — of the first of his experiences of the hollowness of life, and his first full comment on the text, * Vanity of vanities, all is vanity.' / the Preacher, he begins, was king over Israel in Jerusalem. / 46 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [iv. And I gave my heart, he adds, to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven. He gave, he tells us, his whole mind to the search after wisdom in every range of subject beneath the skies. To the pursuit, he means, it would seem, of some clear light that would harmonize and reconcile all the contradictions and anomalies of life, and satisfy all the longings of his soul. He adds words which remind us that his tone is no less removed from the yearning enquiries after God of the Psalmist, or of Job, than from the enthusiasm and delight of the modern student of nature or of science. This weary search for knowledge, he says, is a task imposed on man; to ask and ask, to seek and seek, this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith. ' This sore travail ' is God's gift ; not the power to discover truth, but the imperious instinct that bids him return and return, generation after generation, to the everlasting riddle. And what was the result ^ I looked round, he tells us in verse 14, at all that was done beneath the sun ; I considered the whole range of human life. / have seen all the works that are done under the sun ; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit ; or rather, all is mere breath or vapour ; mere striving after * ox feeding, as some translate it, on, empty wind. And all efforts to set right the tangled skein of life are vain. That which is crooked cannot be made straight : and that which is wanting cannot be numbered. What is absent, missing, or lost, cannot be recovered, or held as your own. And so, as the result of all, I turned to my own heart, and said, how vain the search ! / communed with mine own heart, saying, Lo, I am come to great estate, and have gotteft more wisdom than all they that have been before me in ferusalem : yea, my heart had great experience of wisdom atid knowledge. And I gave my heart to know wisdom, and to know madjiess and folly : I perceived that this also is vexation of spirit (striving after ^ ' A striving after wind,' R. V. IV.] The Pursuit of Wisdom. Ch. i. 12-18. 47 wind). I, who have stood on such vantage ground, who have accumulated such stores of the results of study and thought, have gained only the sad experience that all this is hollow and unsatisfying ; that wider vision brings wider sights of sad- ness, and added knowledge is added sorrow. Wisdom, the wisdom which consists in knowledge, brings no balm to the dis- quiet of the human heart. For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow (verse 18). The language is, as you see at once, that of something more than a passing mood of weariness. It has no resem- blance to that in which the greatest genius that sleeps within this Abbey spoke of himself, as gathering shells and pebbles on the shore of the great ocean, yet unexplored. It does not echo the thought ever present to the mind of the true philosopher, quantum est quod nesci'mus ! ' how vast the field of our ignorance.' It runs far beyond the inevitable depression which, even amidst ' the intoxicating draughts ' of fresh triumphs in the domain of natural science, the infinity of knowledge lays upon her students. Need I say how far it is from the language of St. Paul, we know in part, we prophesy in part, hut when that which is perfect is come, that which is in part shall be done away? I will not divert you from the sense of its full bitterness by putting before you the strange comments by which Jew or Christian has con- verted it into a commonplace series of remarks on the unsatisfactoriness of mere human knowledge as compared to higher teaching. The words are the words of a saddened soul, sad with an infinite sadness. Let us sympathise with that hour of darkness, not turn it into a well-balanced and measured utterance of edifying maxims, which any ordinarily instructed Christian man or woman might quote, with the misjudging piety of the friends of Job, to preach down the tumult of some restless brain or rebellious spirit. But he has not yet sounded the depths of disappointment and despair. Let us follow him, — wearing, as he will, for ./ 48 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [iv. one step further, the mask of Solomon, — to the next stage in his sad experience. He has tried knowledge, and found nothing to satisfy his heart's cravings, and now he will turn i/ elsewhere. We open the second chapter ; we read, / said in mine heart (or, rather, to mine heart). Go to now, I will prove thee (try thee) with mirth, therefore enjoy pleasure ; and he tells at once the sad result before he has filled up the sketch ; and, behold, this also is vanity. I said of laughter. It is mad: and of mirth, What doeth it? Of mirth and laughter, he says, personifying each, I said the one is mad- ness, the other meaningless and profitless. But having said I this — for the sense of hollowness is too acute for him to delay the saying it — he tells at length the story. He recounts to us in the following verses how at first he resolved with his own heart, as we should say, with his soul, to which as our own poet in that ' Palace of Art,' which recalls at every step, and is the best of commentaries on, the whole passage, he ascribes a distinct personality — he resolved to give himself, his flesh, as he says more plainly, to enjoyment and banqueting. / sought in mijie heart to give myself unto wine ; yet not for a moment to the coarse revels of the North, or to the refined gluttony of consular or imperial Rome, yet acquainting mine heart with wisdom ; still, with the reins of my courser held firm, I resolved to go so far only in the folly of a life of enjoyment as to see whether it could bring any real solution to the riddles of life, any true solace for the short-Uved sons of men ; and to lay hold on folly, till I might see what was that good for the sons of men, which they should do wider the heaven all the days of their life. As we read his words we may pause for a moment to note the measured and calm accents in which he records his experience. There is not, there will not be, the slightest trace of any touch of penitence or remorse. It is the autobiography of a self- inspecting philosophic spirit trying experiments on itself, and reporting the result with a sorrowful impartiality. IV.] The Pursuit of Pleasure. Ch. \\. i-io. 49 But to proceed. He goes on with his story in the fourth . and four following verses. He tells us how he opened and trod every avenue of refined and artistic enjoyment. He 7 added palace to palace, like the historic Solomon, or the \ Royal builder of Versailles ; he planted vineyards and parks and gardens, with irrigating lakes and streams, and wide forests, and all the accessories of kingly luxury. And a vast retinue of purchased or home-reared slaves waited on his will, and gold and silver gleamed in his palaces, and all the embellishments of life which are traditional with kings and princes. The singer, male and female, with the musician, was there to charm his ear, and he adds (verse 8) a single phrase which may or may not, for the best authorities are greatly divided, include a reference — at most it is a passing one — to his harem of wives ^; and he crowns the enumeration by telling us in the ninth verse what, if the historic Solomon were speaking, the first Hebrew king who ruled throughout his reign in the Jebusite fastness which his father had won, would have little meaning; he tells us that none in the history of Jerusalem had amassed such ample materials for happiness as he ; adding that wisdom was with him all the time ; guided him in the pursuit of pleasure, never abandoned him in its enjoyment. So I was great, and increased more than all that were before me in Jerusalem : also my wisdom remained with me. And whatsoever mine eyes desired I kept 7iot from them, I with- held not my heart from any joy; for my heart rejoiced in all my labour : and this was my portion of all my labour (vv. 9, 10). He had kept back that human soul, on which he pictures himself as experimenting, from no source of well-ordered en- joyment. He had done his best to win some portion of that fruit of human toil which, in his prologue, he had pro- / nounced unattainable. And what was the end of all ? I paused he tells us, and gathered up my faculties to consider the result. I looked round at all, all that I had built, and bought, and ' See Ch.ii. 8 in R. V. with the marginal notes. E 5o Lectures ofi Ecclesiastes. [iv. planted, and gathered from foreign lands, all that wealth and toil and art had poured into my lap. What was their value when possessed ? , Behold all was vanity and vexation of spirit, vanity and feeding upon wind. Every desire had been fully gratified, •^ and all in vain. He tells us this very simply, with a pathetic simplicity. He does not try to track his failure to its source, or tell us why, or how, or where, he failed. He, the Preacher, as we style him, does not moralise — still less preach — he just paints the picture of his soul's sad wanderings, of the baffled effort of a human heart, and passes on. Theri I looked on all the works that my hands had wrought, and on the labour that I had laboured to do : and, behold, all was vanity and vexation of spirit, and there was no profit under the sun (v. 1 1). And 'so far, the thread of the discourse runs clear. There is no tangle or disarray, and the person, or personation, of the son of David stands out marked and distinct. Soon these helps will be taken from us ; the figure of Solomon will gradually but entirely disappear : another and a sadder than Solomon will pass before us. Yet, just as in the Book of Job, it is the hasty reader who is content to confine himself to the story, the clear and touching story, of the book's short introduction and its shorter close, and by doing so to omit those forty chapters which contain the real and essential subject of the book, so we, I think, shall do well to trace out the view of life put forward in the chapters which follow this introduction. We shall have to follow it through somewhat, we must confess, of a maze and labyrinth to which we cannot always discover a clue. But we may find it for all that a task full of interest. It will suggest to us, as we go on, question after question of exceeding urgency and weight. It will enlarge the range of our sympathies ; it will aid some among us to sympathise with, to comprehend and feel for, the difficulties and conclusions of many of our living contempo- raries, as well as to enter into the troubles of a heart that once IV.] The result of both pursuits. 51 beat as our hearts beat, and has been dust for centuries. It may aid others among us to realize the infinite value of truths, of words, of teaching, that may have become dulled through their very familiarity. As we face steadily the successive phases of a wisdom that has gone the round of the world under the name of Solomon, we shall see in it a record of thoughts and troubles that belong not only to that gloomy age, and we shall turn with fresh thankfulness to Him Who brought a fresh spring of youth to a worn out world ; Who said of Himself ' a greater than Solomon is here.' [November 29, 1884.] E 2 LECTURE V. Chapter II. 12-26. We left our Preacher — if, subject to the reservations already made, we may still accept the title — we left him speaking in the person of King Solomon, and uttering words of profound sadness. He had tried, as we saw, to find contentment and happiness, first in the search after knowledge, and next in the ^ pursuit of enjoyment. Both alike had failed him. The answer that had come back to his own question, What profit hath man of all his toll P to the same question, t in its modern form, Is life worth living ? had been a disas- trous one. Then I looked, he told us, on all the works that my hands had wrought, and on the labour that I had laboured to do : and, behold, all was vanity and vexation of spirit, and there was no profit under the sun (chap. ii. 11). Hitherto, it has not been a very difficult task to follow the speaker's meaning. The very fact that he has spoken in the name of a distinctly-recognised person, with whose individual history we are more or less familiar, and that he has preserved some- thing of one side, at least, of the historical characteristics of the historical Solomon, has supplied a framework, on the lines of which his reflections have been set out, in the form of what we may call a fragment of those autobiographical re- miniscences which rarely fail to interest the reader. But this framework will soon be abandoned. The scaffolding, it has been well said, which supported for a time the growing structure, will be removed, and the plan on which it was commenced will be exchanged for another. We, as we read our Preacher's words, shall feel like those who, after walking v.] Oiapter n. i2-%6. 53 on a solid and well-marked highway, are left to find their course across an almost trackless moorland. And you will feel too, I doubt not, for the difficulties of him who is to act, in some sense, as your guide. He will have often to keep entirely and resolutely in the background the result of laborious hours and perplexing study. He will have to resist the temptation to pause too long, and to waste your energies and his own in straining to recover the dim sense of individual verses, or half verses, to which commentators of equal authority have attached irreconcilable meanings. And besides this, he will find it almost impossible to ask you to accept unreservedly any of the ingenious attempts to convert the coming chapters into a methodical and orderly treatise, working out with distinct purpose a single and well-defined religious or philosophical problem. The mere record of such attempts on the part of Fathers, Rabbis, Divines, Preachers, Poets, Critics, might form an interesting chapter in literary history, I shall therefore be content to treat as shortly as possible, without entirely passing over them, individual difficulties of interpretation and verbal obscurities. I shall only touch on them where great and vital questions are involved. You would, I feel sure, prefer that I should try rather to aid you to gather up, w'here possible, the clue to the various — very various — lines of thought which will now come before us. You would wish me, above all, to place before you a faithful picture of the real and genuine sentiments and teaching of the book ; to draw out what its author really says, as in verse after verse he pours forth the reflections, sometimes clear as day, sometimes wrapped in darkness, always coloured with the sombre hue of some dark hour in the history of his race — as, to use the language of a Jewish commentator^, he ' thinks aloud ' the thoughts that are in his heart. Let us answer the call which is implied, as some hold, in ' David Friedlander, quoted by Ginsburg, p. 80. 54 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [v. the name which he assumes. Let us draw near and Hsten to this ' Assembler ' of his fellow-men. The section which follows that of which I spoke last time is, setting aside two short clauses to which we have lost 'the key, full of interest. It begins at the 12th verse of chapter ii. I turned myself, he says, after these two sad defeats, to behold., to consider, i. e. wisdom., and also viadness and folly. Whether by ' madness and folly ' he means, as his words used just before seem to imply, the pursuit of pleasure, may possibly be questioned. But, at all events, it is clear that, instead of renewing once more the vain and toilsome pursuit of knowledge, he sets himself to consider calmly the relative value of Wisdom in its largest sense ; wisdom practical, and wisdom speculative, and its opposite, which he calls folly. / turned myself to behold wisdom, and madness, and folly. I pass lightly over an obscure half-verse, with its many conflicting interpretations. Let us accept doubtfully one which comes nearest to our own version : Who can do this, he asks in the second part of verse 12, otherwise, or better than King Solomon has already done it ? Then I saw, he says in the 1 3th verse — I convinced myself — that Wisdom excelleth Folly, as far as light excelleth darkness. You will remember what a high, what a royal place is assigned to Wisdom in portions of the Old Testament; how much of all that is good and holy, as well as all that is prudent, the word involves. You may recall the striking passages in which it is personified, almost deified, in the Book of Proverbs \ and again in Job^. You may remember how, outside the circle of the Canonical books, there was a whole ' literature of Wisdom,' of which the Books of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus are types. You will not forget the uses made of the word by our Lord and by His Apostle, a Hebrew of the Hebrews ^. ^ Prov. i. 20; viii, ix. ^ Job xxviii. 12-28. ^ St. Matt. xi. 19; St. James iii. 17. v.] Wisdom mid Folly. Ch. ii. 12-15. ^^ And you will note also the figure by which is expressed here the excellence of Wisdom, by light as opposed to darkness. There could be no stronger contrast to the darkness-hating Oriental mind. You know how often, how incessantly, we might say, they are set against one another, as types of all that is most opposite, alike in the Old Testament and the New. Need I quote that familiar parable where the unpro- fitable servant is cast out from the lighted and festal hall to the ' outer darkness ? ' Yes! I felt sure, he says, in spite of all, that wisdom is a gain ; that he who has it has the gift of eye-sight — a precious gift. We, my friends, have been reminded but lately of its value by the very courage and energy which replaced its loss\ He who has it not walks in darkness. The wise man's eyes, he adds, are in his head, but the fool walketh in darkness. It is one of the many double, parallel, sayings, proverbs in couplets, which will come before us. And yet, and yet, vast, he says, as is the difference which I felt forced to see between them ; splendid as are the charms of Wisdom, unlovely as is the face of Folly, there rose within me a sense that poisoned all, a thought that bred despair. For a little space the wise man seems, yea is, endowed with a gift, a priceless gift, denied to the other, the fool. For a little space, but, ah ! coupled in our own Bibles by the conjunction and, and brought within the compass of the same fourteenth verse, come words almost tragic in their simplicity, and''' I myself perceived also that one event happeneth, one end Cometh, to them all. Then I said iti my heart, As it happeneth to the fool, so it happeneth even to me ; and why was I then more wise .^ Ah ! what avails wisdom, when wisdom and folly lead alike to ' that dark inn, the grave ? ' The?i I said in my heart, that this also is v nity. For it is not only that ^ The reference was to the then recent death of Mr..Fawcett, the late lamented Postmaster-General. 2 ' and yet,' R. V. ^6 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [v. the wise man lies down and dies with the fool, but the wisdom which that 'sore travail' of his soul has gained seems to him, in his bitter mood, to pass away with the flickering torch of life, to pass for ever and for ever. For there is no renieyn- brance, he goes on in the next verse, of the wise more than of the fool for ever ; seeing that which now is in the days to come shall all be forgotten. And how dieth the wise ??ian ? as the fool (ver. 1 6). Not deca.y only, but forgetfulness, is his portion. The shadow of death lies dark and cold on the thinker's soul. It is a burden that makes life heavy. He is not thinking so much of death as the divider ; not of its breakings off, its cuttings short, its baffling disappointments, its heart-piercing separations, which were being touched on by a master hand even while we met here last Saturday \ but of its blank oblite- rations, its wiping out of all life's work. Therefore, he goes on, / hated life ; for life, even at its best, means labour, and death comes and makes it wasted labour, wasted and for- gotten : Therefore I hated life ; because the work that is wrought under the sun is grievor^s unto me : for all is vanity and vexation of spirit. All is vanity and vexation of spirit. Is our sad Preacher the last to quail before the stern reality of death ? You may remember how our own Poet says to the jocund Skylark, — 'Waking or asleep, Thou of death must deem Things more true and deep Than we mortals dream ; Or how could thy notes flow in such a crystal stream ? ' And we recognise the same voice of sadness, ' deep calling unto deep ' across the ages. Let us pass on. The verses which follow, from the eighteenth to the twenty-third, linger round the same sad theme, in language coloured by the circumstances of his age and country. Death comes, and not only all the wisdom of * An address of Mr. Matthew Arnold at Tovnbee Hall. v.] The Doom of Death. Ch. li. 16-23. SI the dead sage goes out, like an extinguished torch, and is forgotten ; but all the other results of his eager toil are lost to him, and pass he knows not whither. Toilsome days, anxious nights, no real enjoyment even in life, and then death comes and blots out all. And then another, he knows not who, some careless unknown stranger, it may be, ■yvho has neither toiled nor spun, enters into the harvest of all his labours. 'The hard heir strides about his lands,' and he sleeps below. His sons come to honour, and he knoweth it not ; and they are brought low, but he perceiveth it not of theni^. Shall we listen to his gloomy thoughts, as, brooding over them, he thinks aloud once more ? Yea, I hated all my labour which I had taken under the sun : because I should leave it unto the man that shall be after me. And who knoweth whether he shall be a wise man or a fool ? yet shall he have rule over all my labour wherein 1 have laboured, and wherein I have shotved tnyself wise under the sun. This is also VANITY. Therefore I went about to cause my heart to despair of all the labour zvhich 1 took under the sun. For there is a man whose labour is in ivisdom, arid in hwwledge, and in equity ; yet to a man that hath not laboured therein shall he leave it for his portion. This also is vanity and a great evil. For what hath man of all his labour, and of the vexation of his heart, wherein he hath laboured under the sun ? For all his days are sorrows, and his travail grief ; yea, his heart taketh not rest in the night. This is also vanity. I cannot join with those who read in these moody verses the language of a Solomon distrusting the character of the Rehoboam who was to succeed him, and to throw away the result of the achievements of David and of his father's wisdom. For myself, the very general form in which the thought is clothed, and much that immediately follows, seem to me to point rather to the hard experience of the ' Job xiv. 21. 58 Lectures 07i Ecclesiastes. [V. uncertain transmission of wealth under Eastern misgovern- ment. But it will interest you to indicate a common inter- pretation, which may commend itself to some among us. Let us return for a moment to what has gone before. It is important that we should enter fully into his thoughts. The writer has compared wisdom and folly. He has recognised the intrinsic excellence of the one, the worth- lessness and deformity of the other. But side by side with this he has before him the terrible, and, as he states the case, the insoluble problem of death. What matters to us, he seems to say, the difference .? We die as the flowers of the forest — as the beasts of the field, he will soon add — wise and foolish alike, we die. And this power of attaining some measure of wisdom, this prerogative of self-imposed toil, in what are we the better for it ? We die, and its results, so far as they are internal, die with us. So far as they are external, they pass to others, perhaps to those unworthy of them. Man walketh in a vain shadow and dis- qiiieteth himself in vain. He heapeth up riches and cannot tell xvho shall gather them'^. So far the Psalmist is with him ; but the Psalmist can add, as we Christians are taught to remem- ber when we lay our brothers in the dust. And noiv, Lord, what is my liope ? Truly my hope is evefi in Thee. But of this clinging to, this trusting in, yearning towards, a God far off, yet near, we have found no trace. Thus far, at least, there is not a touch of any hope beyond the veil of death. 'No breath of answering whisper steals From the shore that hath no shore beyond it.' What shall we find? Something there must surely be to break this intolerable spell of dreariness and gloom. Yes, it meets us quite suddenly, when and where we least look for it ; and here we have its very first appearance : There is nothing better for a man, he breaks forth, in verse 24, than that he should eat and drink, and that he should make his soul ^ Ps. xxxix. 7, 8. v.] The call to enjoyment. Ch. ii. 24-26. 59 etijoy good in his labour. This also I saw, thai it was from the hand of God. This, at least, he tells us, is God's gift, the enjoyment of the present, the immediate entering into the fruit of our labour. Do not therefore shrink from it ; for who, he adds, in words obscure even to darkness, can eat, or who else hasten to it more than I ? (verse 25). Who, he may mean, has a greater and more immediate claim to the fruit of my toil than I, the toiler? For, and now, in verse 26, he strikes, or seems to strike, a very different note, startling us once more by the sudden change. For God giveth to a ?)ian, he says, that is good in his sight wisdo7n, and knowledge, and joy ; hut to the sinner he giveth travail, to gather and to heap up, that he may give him that is good before God. What is this .? You see how abrupt the change ! Does God really give to the good man, not wisdom only, but also knowledge, and not that only, but joy and happiness ? And is it only the bad man, the sinner, who has the weary toil of amassing wealth, which passes in due time to the good? If so, the world is no longer a weary waste, but a very Utopia ; and the speaker, if this is his conviction, has risen from the moral and religious ruins that surrounded him just now, to the perception of an all-pervading righteous rule even in this life. Our Hamlet no longer finds the world out of joint. Dare we say that so bright a light has suddenly illuminated the darkness of which he has been speaking, the darkness of which he is yet to speak in still sadder accents ? If so, he seems to mount too soon and too high. What follows in the same breath, in the same verse ? It is the last verse with which I shall tax your attention to-day : this also IS VANITY AND VEXATION OF SPIRIT. But how SO? HaS he found Strength and comfort in the conviction that goodness brings, even in this life, wisdom, knowledge, joy ? — so he seems to say — and that the prosperity of the wicked is only illusory, and short-lived? Is his language merely that of Psalmist 6o Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [v. after Psalmist, who comforts himself with the thought that the well-doing of the unrighteous is but temporary, that even on this side the grave a sure retribution waits on evil ? That ihey, the evildoers, are set in slippery places and /all suddenly^. Does he believe that happiness and misery, even here on earth, are meted out in strict proportion to the merits of mankind ? If so, why this sad refrain, This also is vanity and vexation of spirit? What! this — a world where perfect justice rules, where goodness always triumphs, and evil is always punished ! You can recall, perhaps, that touching Psalm, just quoted, where, weary with the same problem of the strange ' prosperity of the wicked,' the Psalmist goes into the sanctuary of the Lord, and finds some answer to a question before which his feet were almost gone, his steps had well-nigh slipped. And we know the words with which he hails some partial — a very partial — reply to his sad perplexity : Whom have I in heaven but thee ? and there is none upon earth that / desire beside thee. My flesh and my heart faileth : but God is the strength of my heart, and my portion for ever. But if he who speaks so sadly throughout these verses really holds, what he seems for a moment to hold, that human life, when surveyed in its length and breadth, teaches us not only that goodness in God's sight brings, in the highest sense, wisdom, knowledge, and joy in its train, but also a very different lesson — that all the toil of the wicked goes to swell the earthly prosperity of the good — if this is so, we feel that he has taxed our sympathies for his despairing mood in vain. We can enter for a while into real dejection or into poetic pain; ' Our sweetest songs are those that tell of saddest thought.* But if our poet, if poet he be, has found so simple a solution for God's ' mysterious ways,' for all the inexplicable wounds and sorrows of human life, then this dreary repetition of the most dreary of phrases becomes a phrase and nothing * Ps. Ixxiii. 17. v.] Chapter ii. 36, 61 more — a literary artifice, not a groan wrung from an aching heart. Its repetition henceforth will be as the peevish cry of an angry fancy. The book should have ended here, for the cloud is past, and the sun is in the sky. We should look to hear the singing of the birds, and see earth thick with flowers. Or is it that he states so cheering, yet so inadequate, and, let me add, so unreal a source of comfort, only to put it by ? Does he feel that such a maxim, ' God gives the good man all that is good, the sinner all that is evil,' dear as it was to his fathers, brings him no balm .' Does he repeat it musingly, half ironically, as it were ; and then add, this also is tried in the balance and found wanting — all is vanity and vexation of spirit ? Or is it, rather, that he looks for a moment on his Maker as a God of power, unUmited power and resistless will ? Is it that he finds, or tries to find, in that mere power, that mere will, the solvent of all questions, all problems .'' If so, he who, in the twenty-sixth verse, is ' good before God ' is just the favoured mortal, and ' the sinner,' he who is not favoured ; and he thus divides the world into two classes, the Elect and the Reprobate. And the Elect mean with him, not those who respond to all the hidden movements and pleadings of the Spirit of Truth and Goodness, but the happy, the fortunate in being elect. And by ' the Reprobate ' — ' the sinner ' is his word — he means, not those who resist all workings for good, but those who, though successful for a time, in the end fall into misery and ruin, because they are born under their Maker's frown. We can understand the attraction which such a view might have, in all ages, to minds that, looking out on the suffering and miseries of life, dwell only on the power of a Divine Ruler, and lose sight of His goodness and His love. Do any here remember the terrible lines in which Homer makes the Lord of Heaven, dwelling himself secure, fling out at random the irrevocable lots of life-long happiness or 6a Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [v. misery to men below ^ ? At all events, we remember how Job's heart was tortured by the thought that all his afflictions meant one thing, and one only, the displeasure, the unmerited displeasure, of an all-powerful God. If this is our Preacher's meaning in the closing verse of this chapter, it is no wonder that he feels that he has here one more item in the hollowness and emptiness of life, something that deepens its sadness, intensifies its blackness. This also, he may well add, is vanity and vexation of spirit. Shall I now detain you too long if I ask you, before we part, to pause a moment to feel sure that you have grasped firmly some of the distinct threads of thought or feeling which we have, even so far, found running through the texture of the book ? First, there is the worthlessness of human life. Millions live out in turn their brief hour ; die, and are forgotten. It is an old, time-worn, theme ; it has been dwelt on by poets, and others than poets, from the dawn of reflective speech to the hour at which we meet to-day : it is not only the shortness of life, the successive generations falling away, as Homer said, Hke the leaves in autumn ; but it is its nothing- ness and insignificance. The sun, the earth, the streams endure ; man passes and leaves no trace. The romance of Jewish history, which can still touch the imagination of the English child, has ceased to fire the heart of this world- weary Hebrew. He does not care to look back on the eventful past. Still less does he hear the footsteps of the coming Messiah in the unseen future. Of the fierce fanaticism that was one day to possess his race he has not a spark. There are those who tell us that this green earth beneath us will one day grow cold and still ; the pulse of life die out ; a dead world revolve, in obedience to a law that will survive it, round a fading sun. But to him who speaks to us thus far the world is already dead. Of the » Iliad, xxiv. 524-553. v.] Recapitulation. 6^ faith that whispers that there is a moral and a spiritual life, which is moving on to higher aims in this long series of what seem to him the dull revolving cycles of nature and of history — a life which is more real and more enduring than the abiding earth, and the ceaseless river, and the unex- hausted sea — that all past changes have been heralds of future progress — that man has a destiny and a nature other than that of the brooks and springs, he has, or indicates at present, no sense, no mastery. Vantly of vanities, all is vanity. And again, though he sees, and feels, and says, that some- how wisdom and knowledge are better — far better — than ignorance and folly, yet, in the dark mood of these opening chapters the possession of these priceless jewels brings no comfort. Take wings, he seems to say, and reach with toil and effort the utmost bounds of human thought ; it will not add — trust my sad experience — a grain to life's happiness or meaning. It will only make its burden heavier ; for in much wisdom is much grief, and he that iticreaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Or try enjoyment. ' Build for thy soul a lordly pleasure- house.' Ransack the world for some paesing alleviation to the bitter sense of life's hollowness. It will profit nothing. This too is vanity. / said of laughter it is mad, and of mirth what profiteth it ? What then ? fall back on the sense that, after all, wisdom is in itself better than folly .'' comfort thyself with this, and care not for the rest. Hold this 'and walk with inward glory crowned.' Alas ! there sits waiting on thy path ' the shadow feared of man.' Death comes, and you and the poor, ignorant, and foolish son of a common race lie dowai together ; and all your wisdom and your high thoughts die with you, and will be clean forgotten ; and all your prudent toil and self-denial, your laborious days and unrestful nights, will have provided what will pass into heedless hands while you, the toiler, are mouldering in the grave. Therefore, he 64 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [V. says, / hated life, for all that is wrought beneath the sun is grievous unto me. Life then, he seems to whisper, is itself an evil. He will say this more clearly soon. But he has said enough, already, to show that if we call the writer a preacher, he comes to us with no gospel of joy on his lips. His book is written thus far within and without with lamentation, and mourning, and woe. He can only teach us the need, the sore need, of words of comfort, of some ' tidings of great joy ' to himself, to us, and all mankind. Thus far, then, we have only the voice of those who in all time, not least in our own, have said that life is no blessing ; have answered the question, ' were it not better not to be ? ' in an affirmative. But we have also, let us note it well, the first appearance, the first dawn, of another train of thought that will form a marked feature in all that lies before us. Life being in itself so sad, that voice will say, do not strain thyself to solve these questions. Do not beat against thy prison bars. Eat and drink ; enjoy, i. e. the labour of thy hands. Even this is a gift from God. Do not scorn it, but hold it fast. All gifts, he adds, in a verse on whose obscurity I have already touched, come from him ; thou hast a right to them. Weariness, despondency, a sense of the vain conflict be- tween man's aspirations for something enduring, and the terrible reality of death ; a call to accept what temporary alleviations the passing moment brings ; these are so far our preacher's topics. They end with a reference of all things to the will of a God from whom, in one way or another, comes, he feels, what little good man can enjoy. Call him a pessimist, call him a fatalist, call him what you will, he is certainly, it has been justly said, no Atheist ; even in his darkest mood he is full of the sense ' that there is a God above him.' The cloud that hides the face of that God from him will grow darker still. His soul will be shadowed by an intenser v.] Recapitulation. 6^ night. But the sense that there is a God behind and above the cloud will never fail him. Ah I we can but say, that to that weary soul there could have come some glimpse of Him whom prophets and kings desired to see, some gracious revelation of a Father's love ; that he could have laid his hand on the very hem of the garment of Him whose coming in the flesh we soon shall celebrate. [December 6, 1884.] LECTURE VI. Chapter III. It is possible that some among those whom I am addressing may have set themselves at one time or another in their lives, perhaps quite recently, to read through the Book of Ecclesiastes. In spite of occasional obscurities, they have, doubtless, been able to recognise some continuity of thought, some approach to method, in the first two chapters. But as they enter on the third, all seems changed. It is not only that the personality, real or assumed, of King Solomon as the speaker, is entirely dropped : it is not merely that everything approaching the form of personal reminiscences, or autobiographical confessions, is henceforth absent; they pass at once into an entirely different atmosphere alike of thought and of style. They find themselves suddenly confronted, from the very first verse, with a series of epigrammatic aphorisms, reminding them of the central portion of the Book of Proverbs. Here, as there, each of these aphorisms is thrown into the form of a couplet or distich, a verse containing two lines, one answering to another with that parallelism, or cor- respondence, that rhyme, as it were, not of sound but of sense, in which Hebrew poetry so largely consists. In this chapter we shall find that each of these 'proverbs' will begin with the same word, and will enforce one and the same lesson. It is a lesson which is common alike to the experience of Hebrew, Greek, and Englishman ; taught alike by the Greek sage and by our own Shakespeare. It tells us that to everything there is a season, a time ; that there is a right moment to every purpose under heaven. The truth is conveyed, first of all, in the opening verse, and VI,] Chapter iii. t-8. 67 is repeated under various forms, covering the manifold occupations and interests of human life, through eight verses. To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven : A time to be born, and a time to die ; A time to plant, and a time to pluck up that tvhich is planted ; A time to kill, and a tirne to heal ; A time to break down, and a time to build up ; A time to weep, and a time to laugh; A time to mour7i, and a time to dance ; A time to cast away stones, and a tivie to gather stones together ; A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing ; A time to get, and a time to lose ; A time to keep, and a time to cast away ; A time to rend, and a time to sew ; A time to keep silence, and a time to speak ; A time to love, and a time to hate ; A time of war, atid a time of peace. Now the meaning of these verses, taken separately, is clear enough ; but as we read them through we naturally ask, what place do these repeated adages and maxims — these common truisms we might even add — hold in the course of the writer's thoughts ? If all is vanity, if all things are proved to be hollow, why waste his breath in telling us, with a some- what tedious iteration, that just as birih and death, and war and peace, come at their allotted time in the life of the indi- vidual or of the nation, so there is a fit time for every act, however voluntary, and for every emotion, however natural ? It would be easy to imitate the great majority of older commentators, and to dismiss the really important question of the general bearing of this string of aphorisms, placed side by side with an Oriental prolixity, and to divert your attention by afifixing all kinds of mystical, historical, and theological senses to each of the separate combinations of words and F 2 68 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [vi. images in which the same lesson is successively enforced. But I will not try to find, with Christian commentators, an allusion to the doctrine of Justification by Faith or Works, in 'gathering and casting away stones;' or, with Rabbinical writers, to the duty of putting to death by stoning disobedient children, or to the wisdom of throwing overboard a cargo in a storm. But I will ask, why do we meet this fragment of the Book of Proverbs in a place that seems of all others so unsuited to its introduction ; breaking up, as it does, the natural progress of the writer's thoughts, as a Greek chorus suspends, for other reasons, the action of a Greek tragedy ? In answering this question, we must not forget how familiar these two-fold sententious maxims, in which one man's insight gathers up the experience of many, were to the Jewish mind ; or how natural their use would be to one who wrote in the school, so to speak, of the royal and traditional master of Proverbs, King Solomon; or again, how dear they are at this moment to the kindred Arab races. I may remind you also how often our Lord Himself mingled them with His teaching : — Give not that which is holy unto dogs ^, Neither cast ye your pearls before swine. Aerain : He that is not with Me is against Me^, He that gather eth not with Me scatter eth abroad. And secondly, as to the more important question, their meaning here. Is it not this ? ' There is a law and order in all things,' they seem to say : ' a fitness and unfitness, could we but see it. Life, death, destruction, production, growth, decay, sorrow, joy, loss, gain, come at fixed times. We cannot alter these times any more than we can call up winter's snows in the midst of summer.' It seems a feeling akin to that which we call Fatalism; or rather, as that implies some power called Fate, apart from God, of a pre- ^ St. Matthew vii. 6. ^ St. Matthew xii. 30. VI.] Chapter iii. 1-9. 69 determined, necessary course of things, so ordained by the Lord of human history as to leave no scope for human freedom. All things are ordered, fixed, settled, timed and dated, as it were, beforehand. Even as in the first chapter he had said that each group of events is repeated in regular cycle ; that there is nothing, absolutely nothing, new beneath the sun ; so here, he adds, the revolution proceeds with un- deviating, clockwork, steady regularity. Among Western nations, and here in England, it is quite true that, whatever may be men's theories as to the freedom or absence of freedom of the human will, they act them- selves and treat others as free agents. Men may, as did Milton's fallen angels, sit apart ' on a hill retired ' — 'And reason high Of Providence, foreknowledge, will, and Fate, Fixed fate, freewill, foreknowledge absolute. And find no end, in wandering mazes lost^' But when they come down from that ' hill retired,' to mix with the crowds of living, erring, striving, suffering men in the world below, they leave their theories and their speculations behind them. Our writer, however, is not speaking here of the abstract freedom of the human will, but rather of the value or worthlessness of human action. To his saddened eye the law of order and recurrence which he sees is pressed at once to its mournful and logical conclusion. He sees no room for the development of human character in contact with these fixed phenomena and these iron laws of life ; and thus he ends his string of proverbial couplets by asking, in verse 9, not for the first time, the despairing question. What profit hath he that worketh in that wherein he laboureth? What gain has the toiler, imprisoned within these remorseless laws, from all his toil ? It is not, remember, the higher warning yet to come from lips divine, the lesson against over-toil, over-anxiety, drawn from the bright lilies that clothed the fields of Palestine » 'Paradise Lost,' Bk. ii. 559. v^ 70 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [vi. with a splendour beyond that of Solomon in all his glory. He is not leading up to words of tenderness such as, Your heavenly Father careth for you. It is just the dark thought that toil is vain, for man is in face of forces which he cannot read, or mould, or bend. And then, in the tenth verse, he speaks again in his own person: ' I,' he says, 'even I, have looked with anxious eyes into the various forms of an activity which, profitless as it is, God has assigned to the sons of men.' / have seen the travail, which God hath given to the sons of men to be exercised in it. It is a pathetic touch, this careful survey of mankind all busied in that which cannot profit ; and the words which follow, could we only be certain that we grasped firm their true meaning, are full of a mournful, but suggestive poetry. He has made, he says in the eleventh verse, all things around man fair. He hath made eveiything beautiful in his time : in its place and season. For a moment the sense of the beauty of created things, of which there seemed no perception in the opening chapter, seems to cross his soul. We shall find a trace of it again. The world, he says, in which He has placed man, is no wild waste, but of exceeding beauty. Do our thoughts go back for a moment from these darkened skies to some distant scene — to bright skies, or •snowy mountains, or heathery moorland, or green pastures, or sparkling sea.? Then, he adds, not, we have reason to believe, as our translation runs, he has set the world^, but, ' he has set eternity, a sense of the infinite, in man's heart ; yet so that he cannot read, cannot understand, the work that God doeth from the beginning to the end.' Let me read the verse : also he hath set eternity, or the infinite, in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God ?naketh {doeth) from the beginning to the end. What does he say ? Is it this .^ He has framed man to lead a life of labour and activity ; encaged him in a world of ' The Revised Version retains ' the world ' in the text, but gives ' eternity ' in the margin. VI.] Chapter iii. 10-13. 7^ order and of beauty. Within him is a sense of the endless, the infinite, the absolute, that yearns out to this Order and this Beauty. Yet he cannot satisfy this sense, he cannot read God's works. It is a thought, a feeling, common to our race ; 'those obstinate questionings Of sense and outward things, Fallings from us, vanishings ; ' that that 'Vague emotion of delight In gazing up an Alpine height,' ' Yearning to the lamps of night.' God has set before man the desire to read the ' riddle of the painful earth,' but has withheld the key. 'The end and the beginning vex His spirit, many things perplex.' It is a sigh that has been heaved, not only in the days whether of Solomon or of one who used his name, but wherever the hum.an soul has tried to pierce the darkness that environs it. But if, as seems most probable, this is the Preacher's thought, he comes back at once to the one single lesson of practice which he has yet drawn. Man's toil may, or may not, be vain ; that depends on laws and sequences which he cannot master, which he did not frame. Man's eye will never read the mysteries that surround him. Let him there- fore cease to repine and — he gives the advice for the second time — recognise the one good thing within his reach. There is one thing good, viz. to rejoice, be cheerful, and to do good (the phrase, I fear, answers to our well-doing in its sense of happiness) in his life, while his brief day lasts. Let him eat and drink, and enjoy the fruit of his labour. It is the gift of ^ God (vv. 12, 13). I need scarcely tell you that those who are not content to take the speaker's words as they find them, use them here as a vehicle for thoughts absolutely at variance with their plain meaning. ' Rejoicing ' means, * rejoicing in 72 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [vi. the study of the Law,' says the pious Rabbi. ' Eating and drinking' must surely mean 'the partaking of the blessed Sacrament/ says the Christian Father, But to him who would ask, first of all, what is the real thought set before us on the open page, there is no evading the fact that, so far as the Preacher has yet advanced, he finds no better solace for poor mankind, — miseris mortalibus, as Virgil, echoing the words of Homer, described our race, — than simple and v/^ thankful enjoyment of the fruits of toil. It is the gentler and sweeter side of the adage from whose degrading form St. Paul, in presence of the Cross and Resurrection of his Lord, shrank with such horror. ' Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die ^.' / know, says our Preacher in verses 12 and 13, that there is no good in them, but for a man to rejoice, and to do good in his life. And also that every man should eat and drink, and enjoy the good of all his labour, it is the gift of God. So run his words. We feel at once that there may possibly have been times and seasons when such advice was the best that could be found. ' There is,' he has told us just now, ' a time for all things ' — A time to plant, a time to pluck up ; A time to break down, and a time to build up. May we not say, in very sacred words, that ' unless such times had been shortened ' man's spiritual nature must have been in danger of mournful shipwreck ? But we return to the passage. ' Let man,' he says, ' enjoy God's gift. It is the gift of One whose will is resistless, whose laws are unchangeable.* And he goes on in verse 14, / know that whatsoever God doeth it shall be for ever ; nothing can be put to it (nothing added), nor anything taken from it : and God doeth it, that men should fear before Him. He displays His power to make men bend before it. It is not, you will observe, God's undeviating righteousness, still less His love, but His power, that is here put forward ; it is not man's ^ 1 Cor. XV. 32. VI.] Chapter iii. 12-15. 73 sinfulness, but his powerlessness, that is the lesson dwelt on. And once more, in verse 15, he dwells on the unvarying, un- changeable order that marshals the course of the world's history, That which hath been is now ; And that which is to be hath already been. ' There is nothing new,' he has already said, ' under the sun.' And God, he goes on, requireth — or, rather, recalls, bringeth back in due time — that which is past, that which has fled on the wings of time. The old drama is played out, in the old way, by other actors. The lesson to cheerfulness under such bidding seems a hard one. Men have recited it over the wine-cup in old times and new, in East and West. But the human heart, with such shadows gathering in the background, has recog- nised its hollowness, and again and again has put back the anodyne from its lips. Let us, too, pass it by, even as our Preacher does. For we have now to penetrate more deeply into the sources of his unabated sadness. We shall see other phantoms, more grisly than those which were born within his own bosom, rise up to mar the joy which he commends. And moreover, he says, in verse 16, and with these two simple conjunctions he passes into another and a different gallery of the dark pictures of life through which he leads us. He is no longer gazing sadly on an unchanging earth, and a weary round of suns, and winds, and waters, and a spreading expanse of human graves. He is no longer experimentalizing, so to speak, on his own soul ; ' roaming with a hungry heart' through the realms of knowledge or of pleasure. Nor, again, is he contemplating any longer that series of unchanging laws, the sense of which chills and paralyses him. He simply looks out on the ordinary course of daily life, and sees an ill-ordered world, * a world,' to use the words of an honoured leader of modern science, 'full not of pain only, but of injustice, in which the weakest goes to the wall. y 74 Lectures 07i Ecclesiastes. [vi. And moreover, he says, in verse i6, And moreover I saw under the sun the place of judgment, that wickedness was there ; and the place of righteousness, that iniquity was there. We f Englishmen can hardly enter into the full bitterness of his words. We may question, we may criticise, we may blame from time to time, this or that magisterial or judicial decision ; but we have a profound belief that the administration of justice in our own land, and in its dependencies, is, and has long been, pure and impartial. We can hardly realize the general demoralisation, the poison introduced into the very arteries and veins of the social system, when once such administration becomes thoroughly corrupt. Still less can we realize the misery that results, when not corruption only, but corruption and tyranny, take their places on the seat of justice ; when that earthly Law which confronts men in their daily life is no longer the reflection of that of which our own Hooker says, that ' its seat is in the bosom of God, and its voice the harmony of the universe,' but is the embodiment of all wickedness and all injustice. May we guard with righteous jealousy the heritage into which we have entered 1 May we carry the blessings of pure justice and fair dealing w'herever our flag flies or our language is spoken. May our children pass it on unimpaired to their children's children. But you hardly need to be reminded that millions of human beings still live under a rule to which the simple words that I have just read, / saw under the sun the place of judgment that wickedttess was there, And the place of righteousness that iiiiquity was there, are still fully applicable. And we know how deep was the yearning for righteousness on the seat of justice in the heart of the Jewish nation ; how often it finds a voice in Psalmist and in Prophet. You remember how, in the noble picture of the ideal King in the 72 nd Psalm, we have the emphatic words, recurring again and again, that paint the attribute of Justice on the bench, He shall judge thy people VI.] Chapter iii. 16. 75 iviih righteousness, and thy poor with judgnicnt. He shall judge the poor of the people, he shall save the children of the needy, and shall break in pieces the oppressor. For he shall de- liver the needy when he crieth; the poor also, and him that hath no helper. It is a Psalm of which, as you will see by the heading in your Bibles, tradition spoke as David's prayer for Solomon. And you know how the Prophet, in the Evening Lesson for the Second Sunday in Advent, read here so lately, speaks of one who Shall not Judge after the sight of his eyes, Neither reprove after the hearing of his ears, But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, And reprove with equity for the meek of the earth ^ Such texts give a livelier meaning to such words as shall the fudge of all the earth do wrong ? Shall God imitate this corrupt herd of judges ? And they even lend a force to our Lord's parable of the Unjust Judge, as drawn, like all His other teaching, from the familiar experience of daily life. I have heard it said, since I last spoke here, by one who has a rare knowledge of Oriental life, that if one known to be incorruptible and all-powerful were to mount his horse in the streets of Constantinople, and make his way through realm after realm under Eastern governments, his course would be lined from first to last with suppliants for mere justice ; his ears deafened with the cry of that poor woman in the parable, ' give me justice against my adversary.' I have spoken at this length on the subject in order that we may clearly realize the effect on the mind of him whose words we are considering, of the spectacle, the bewildering and baffling spectacle, on which he looked; an Eastern state, where unrighteousness and corruption were in full possession of unlimited power. Let me read the words in which he will emphasise in the next chapter what he has seen, So I returned, he will say, and considered all the oppressions ' Isaiah xi. 3, 4. y6 Lectures on Ecclesiastes. [Vi. that are done under the sun : and behold the tears of such as were oppressed, and they had no comforter ; and on the side of their oppressors there was power ; but they had no comforter'^. What a picture of human society ! Yet it is a sight such as i under many an Eastern government might still be seen. ' The words would find an echo from thousands of some race, ruled — shall we say ? — by a Mahommedan conqueror, possi- bly from some nominally Christian land, where the mind of the ruling class is sapped by corruption, and demoralized by suspicion and personal fear. Could such words, let me ask once more, have come from the lips of a Solomon ; of a king whose reign was proverbial for the prosperity of his well- ordered empire; whose one sigh in his youth had been 'to judge rightly this thy great people^;' whose early fame rested on his righteous judgments ? Can we believe that, as in his grey hairs he looked out from his palace, or travelled from town to town, he saw, and sadly acquiesced in, one dead level of cruel and unrighteous administration, of the prostitu- tion of that justice which was so dear to his own youth and to the instincts of his nation ? Are we to believe that into the glowing picture given of his reign by the sacred historian we must interpolate the words, From Dan even unto Beersheba there was injustice on the seat of justice, and the poor were oppressed, and there was no helper ? If so, well might we, in the name of human nature, echo the cry of the Northern tribes, 'To your tents, O Israel! now see to thine own house, David ^.' Let me return to the words before us. He whose moody thoughts we are following looked out on this depressing sight of misrule and misery. There rose, he tells us, within him a y' gleam of hope. I said in mine heart, he says in verse 17, God shall judge the righteous and the wicked: for there is a time therefor every I purpose and for every work. It is the first glimpse that we I have seen of such a hope among the dark thoughts that cross I Mv. I. 2 I Kings iii. 9. ^ i Kings xii. 16. VI.] Chapter iii. 17-21. 77 him. There, before God's throne — there, not here — every purpose, every thought, and every deed shall have its time, its hour, i. e. of trial and retribution. But the hope eludes his grasp ; and there comes in its place another and a sadder voice. / said, he goes on immediately, / said in mine heart concerning the estate, the high estate, of the sons of men, that it was just this, that God might manifest them, show them what they really were, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts. It is, he says, man's sad prerogative to be conscious of his doom. And then, in line after Hue, he dwells upon and enforces the gloomy and despairing verdict of his heart, that man and beast share the same being, draw the same breath, are animated by the same life, spring from the same source, go back to the same elements. For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts ; even one thing befalleth them : as the one dieth, so dieth the other : yea, they have all one breath ; so that a man hath no preeminence above a beast : for all is VANITY. All go unto one place ; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again (vv. 19, 20). ' All is vanity.' And then, as though in answer to some faint suggestion of a larger hope. Who knoweth, he says very sadly inverse 21, whether — so the best authorities, so all the ancient versions ^— Pf%■ S ,. 6 1. THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, ETC. HEBREW, etc. JS'otes on the Hebrew Text of the Book of Genesis. By G. J. Spurrell, M.A. Crown 8vo. ■ los. 6d. Notes on the Hehreiv Text of the Books of Samuel. By S. R. Driver, D.D. 8vo. 14s. Treatise on the use of the Tenses in Hebrew. By S. R. Driver, D.D. Third Edition. Crown 8vo. 7.S. 6d. The Psalms in Hebrew withmit points. Stiff covers, 2s. A Commentary on the Book of Proverbs. Attributed to Abra- ham Ibn Ezra. Edited from a MS. in the Bodleian Library by S. R. Driver, D.D. Crown 8vo. paper covers, 3s. 6d. Vol. II. Svo. I2S. Gd. Vol. III. Svo. 16s. London; Hll;^•RY Fbowde, Amen Corner, E.G. FATHERS OF THE CHURCH. ENGLISH. The Book of Wisdom : the Greek Text, the Latin Vulgate, and the Authorised English Version ; with an Introduction, Critical Apparatus, and a Com- mentary. By W. J. Deane, M.A. 4to. 123. 6d. GOTHIC. The Gospel of St Mark in Gothic, according to the translation made by Wulfila in the Fourth Century. Edited, with a Grammatical Introduction and Glossarial Index, by W. W. Skeat, Litt. D. Extra fcap. 8vo. 4s. 2. FATHERS OP THE CHURCH, ETC. St. Athanasius : Orations against the Avians. With an account of his Life by William Bright, D.D. Crown 8vo. 9s. Historical Writings, ac- cording to tlie Benedictine Text. With an Introduction by W. Bright, D.D. Crown 8vo. los. 6rf. St. Augustine : Select Anti- Pelagian Treatises, and the Acts of the Second Council of Orange. With an Introduction by William Bright, D.D. Crown 8vo. 9s. St. Basil: The Book of St. Basil on the Holy Spirit. A Revised Text, with Notes and Introduction by C. F. H. Johnston, M.A. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Canons of the First Four General Councils of Nicaea, Constanti- nople, Ephesus, and Chalcedon. With Notes by W. Bright, D.D. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6a!. Catenae Graecoruni Patrwin in Novum Tesfamentum. Edidit J. A. Cramer, S.T.P. Tomi VIII. 8vo. 2I. 4s. Clementis Alexandrini Opera, ex recensions Guil. Bindorfli. Tomi IV. 8vo. 3?. Cyrilli Archiepiscopi Alexan- drini in XII Prophetas. Edidit P. E. Pusey, A.M. Tomi II. 8vo. 2I. 2s. in D. Joannis Evan- gelium. Accedunt Fragmenta Varia necnon Tractatus ad Tiberium Dia- conum Duo. Edidit post Aubertum P. E. Pusey, A.M. Tomi III. 8vo. 2l. 5s. Commentarii in Lucae Evangelium quae supersunt Sijriace. E mss. apud Mus. Britan. edidit R. Payne Smith, A.M. 4to. il. 2s. The same, translated by R. Payne Smith, M.A. 2 vols. Svo. 14s. Ephraemi Syri, Rabulae Epi- scopi Edesseni, Balaei, aliorumque Opera Selecta. E Codd. Syriacis mss. in Museo Britannico et Bibliotheca Bodleiana asservatis primus edidit J. J. Overbeck. 8vo. il. is. Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae Praeparationis Libri A'V. Ad Codd. mss. recensuit T. Gaisford, S.T.P. Tomi IV. Svo. il. 10s. Evangelicae Bemonstra- tionis Libri X. Recensuit T. Gaisford, S.T.P. Tomi II. Svo. 15s. contra Hierocleni et Marcellum Libri. Recensuit T. Gais- ford, S.T.P. Svo. 7s. Oxford : Clarendon Pres--, ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. Eusebius' Ecclesiastical His- toiij, according to the text of Burton, with an Introduction by W. Bright, D.D, Crown 8vo. 8s. 6d. E vagrii Histo r ia Ecclesia st lea , ex recensione H. Valesii. 8vo. 4s. Irenaeus : The Third Book of St. Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons, against Heresies. With short Notes and a Glossary by H. Deane, B.D. Crown Svo. 5s. 6d. Origenis Philosoj^humena ; sive omnium Haeresium Refutatio. E Codice Parisino nunc primum edi- dit Emmanuel Miller. Svo los. Patrum Apostolicorum, S. Cle- • mentis Romani, S. Ignatii, S. Fohjcarpi, ■ quae supersunt. Edidit Guil. Jacobson, S.T.P.R. Tomi II. Fourth Edition. Svo. il. IS. Reliquiae Sacrae secundi ter- tiique saeculi. Recensuit M. J. Routh, S.T.P. Tomi Y. Second Edition. Svo. il. 5s. Scriptorum Ecclesiasticoruvi Opuscula. Eecensuit M. J. Routh, S.T.P. Tomi II. Svo. los. Socrates' Ecclesiastical His- tory, according to the Text of Hussey, with an Introduction by William Bright, D.D. Crown Svo. 7s. 6rf. Sozomerd Historia Ecclesi- astica. Edidit R. Hussey, S.T.B. Tomi III. Svo. 15s. Tertulliani Apologeticus ad- versus Gent es pro Christianis. Edited, with Introduction and Notes, by T. Herbert Bindley, M.A. Crown Svo. 6s. Theodoreti EcclesiasticaeHis- toriae Libri V. Recensuit T. Gaisford, S.T.P. Svo. 7s. 6d. 3. ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY, ETC. Baedae Historia Ecclesiastica. Edited, with English Notes, by G. H. Moberly, M.A. Crown Svo. I OS. 6d. Bigg. The Christian Platonists of Alexandria ; being the Bampton Lectures for 1S86. By Charles Bigg, D.D. Svo. 10s. 6d. Bingham's Antiquities of the Christian Church, and other Works. 10 vols. Svo. 3L 3s. Bright. Chapters of Early English Church History. By W. Bright, D.D. Second Edition. Svo. 12s. Burnet's History of the Refor- mation of the Church of England. A . new Edition. Carefully revised, and the Records collated with the ori- ginals, by N. Pocock, M.A. 7 vols. Svo. 1?. los. Cardwell's Docwmentary An- nals of the Reformed Church of England ; being a Collection of Injunctions, Declarations, Orders, Articles of Inquiry, etc. from 1546 to 1716. 2 vols. Svo. 1 8s. Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents relating to Great Britain and Ireland. Edited, after Spelman and Wilkins, by A. W. Haddan, B.D., and W. Stubbs, D.D. Vols. I and III. Medium Svo, each il. is. Vol. II, Part I. Medium Svo, 10s. 6d. Vol. II, Part II. Church of Ireland ; Memorials of St. Patrick. Stiff covers, 3s. 6d. London: Henry Fhowde, Amen Poiner, E.C. ENGLISH THEOLOGY. Fuller's Church Histoid of Britain. Edited by J. S. Brewer, M.A. 6 vols. 8vo. \l. igs. Gibson's Synodus Anglicana. Edited by E. Cardwell, D.D. 8vo. 6s. Hamilton's {Archbishop John) Catediism, 1552. Edited, with In- troduction and Glossary, by Thomas Clraves Law, Librarian of the Signet Library, Edinburgh. With a Pre- face by the Right Hon. W. E. Glad- tjtone. Demy 8vo. 1 2s. 6d. Hussey. Rise of the Pctpal Power, traced in three Lectures. By Robert Hiissey, B.D. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 4s. 6d. John, Bishop of Ephesus. The Tliird Part of his Ecclesiastical History. [In Syriac] Now first edited by William Cureton,M. A. 4to. iZ. 12s. The same, translated by E. Payne Smith, M.A. 8vo. los. Le Neve's Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae. Corrected and continued from 1715 to 1853 by T. Duffus Hardy. 3 vols. 8vo. il. is. Noelli (A.) Catechismus sive prima instituiio disci'pKnaque Pieiatis Christianas Latine explicata. Editio nova cura Guil. Jacobson, A,M. 8vo. 5s. 6d. Becords of the Beformation. !Z%e J[>ii'orce, 1527-1533. Mostly now for the first time printed from MSS. in the British Museum and other Libraries. Collected and arranged by N. Pocock, M.A. 2 vols. 8vo. i^. 16s. Beformatio Legum Ecclesias- ticarum. The Reformation of Eccle- siastical Laws, as attempted in the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI, and Elizabeth. Edited by E. Card- well, D.D. 8vo. 6s. 6rf. Shirley. Sor)ie Account of the Church in the Apostolic Age. By W.W. Shirley, D.D. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 3s. 6d. Stillingfleet's Origines Bri- tannicae, with Lloyd's Historical Account of Church Government. Edited by T. P. Pantin, M.A. a vols. 8vo. I OS. Stubbs. Registrum Sacrum Atiglicanum. An attempt to exhibit the course of Episcopal Succession in England. By W. Stubbs, D.D. Small 4to. 8s. 6d. 4. ENGLISH THEOLOGY. Bradley. Lectures on the Book of Job. By George Granville Bradley, D.D., Dean of Westmin- ster. Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. • Lectures on Ecclesiastes. By G. G. Bradley, D.D., Dean of Westminster. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. Bull's Works, with Nelson's Life. Edited by E. Burton, D.D. 8 vols. Svo. 2l. gs. Burnet's Exposition of the XXXIX Articles. 8vo. 7s. Butler's Works. 2 vols. Svo. Oxford : Clarendon Press. ENGLISH THEOLOGY. Comber's Co^nipaiiion to the Temple; or a Help to Devotion in the use of the Common Prayor. 7 vols. 8vo. il. lis. 6d. Cranmer's Works. Collected and arranged by H. Jenkyns, M.A., Fellovvr of Oriel College. 4 vols, 8vo. II. los. Enchiridion Thoologicum Anti-Romaman. Vol. I. Jeremy Taylor's Dissua- sive from Popery, and Treatise on the Real Presence. 8vo. 8s. Vol. II. Barrow on the Suprem- acy of the Pope, with his Dis- course on the Unity of the Church. 8vo. "js. 6d. Vol. III. Tracts selected from Wake, Patrick, Stillingfleet, Clagett, and others. 8vo. lis. Greswell's Harmonia Evan- gelica. Fifth Edition. 8vo. 9s, 6d. Hall's Works. Edited by P. Wynter, D.D. 10 vols. 8vo. 3^.35. Heurtley. Harmonia Sym- bolica : Creeds of the Western Church. By C. Heurtley, D.D. 8vo. 6s. 6d. Homilies appointed to be read in Churches. Edited by J. Griffiths, M.A. 8vo. 7s. 6d. Hooker's Works, with his Life by Walton, arranged by John Keble, M.A. Seventh Edition. Revised by R. W. Church, M.A., Dean of St. Paul's, and F. Paget, D.D. 3 vols. medium 8vo. il. i6s. the Text as arranged by J. Keble, M.A. 2 vols. 8vo. lis. Jackson's (Dr. Thomas) Works. 12 vols, 8vo, 2)1. 6s. Jewel's Works. Edited by R. W. Jelf, D.D. 8 vols. 8vo. il. 10s. Martineau. A Study of Re- ligion : its Sources and Contents. By James Martineau, D.D. 2 vols. Crown 8vo. 15s. Patrick's Theological Works. 9 vols. 8vo, il. is. Pearson's Exposition of the Creed. Revised and corrected by E. Burton, D.D. Sixth Edition. 8vo, 1 OS. (>d. Minor Theological Works. Edited with a Memoir, by Edward Churton, M.A. 2 vols. 8vo. los. Sanderson's Works. Edited by W. Jacobson, D.D, 6 vols. 8vo. ll. I OS. Stillingfleet's Origines Sacrae. 2 vols. 8vo. 9s. Rational Account of the Grounds of Protestant Religion ; being a vindication of Archbishop Laud's Relation of a Conference, etc. 2 vols. 8vo. I OS. Wall's History of Infant Bap- tism. Edited by H. Cotton, D.C.L. 2 vols. 8vo. ll. IS. Waterland's Works, with Life, by Bp. Van Mildert. A new Edition, with copious Indexes. 6 vols. 8vo. 2l. IIS. Revieiu of the Doctrine of the Eucharist, with a Preface by the late Bishoi^ of London. Crown 8vo. 6s. 6d. Loudou : IIenuy Frowde, Aiuen Coruor, E.C. LITURGIOLOGY. Wheatly's llhistration of the Book of Common Prayer. 8vo. 5s. Wyclif. A Catalogue of the Original Works of John Wyclif. By W. W. Shirley, D.D. 8vo. 3s. 6d. Wyclif. Select English Woi^ks^ By T. Arnold, M.A. 3 vols. 8vo. ll. IS. Trialogus. With the Supplement now first edited. By Gotthard Lechler. Svo. 7s. 5. LITURGIOLOGY. Gardwell's Two Books of Corti- mon Prayer, set forth by authority in the Reign of King Edward VI, compared with each other. Third Edition. Svo. 7s. ■ History of Conferences on the Book of Common Prayer from 155 1 to 1690. Tli'.rd Edition. Svo. ■ 7s. ()d. Hammond. Liturgies, Eastern and Western. Edited, with Intro- . duction, Notes, and a Liturgical Glossary, by C. E. Hammond, M.A. Crown Svo. 10s. 6^. An Appendix to the above, crown Svo, paper covers, is. 6d. Helps to the Study of the Book of Common Prayer. Being a Companion to Church WorshiiJ. Grown Svo. 3s. 6d. Leofric Missal, The, as used in the Cathedral of Exeter during the Episcopate of its first Bishop, A.D. 1050-1072 ; together with some Account of the Red Book of Derby, the Missal of Robert of Jumi^ges, and a few other early MS. Service Books of the English Church. Edited, with Introduction and Notes, by F.E. Warren, B.D., F.S.A. 4to, half- morocco, \l. 15s. Maskell. Ancient Liturgy of the Church of England, according to the uses of Sarum, York, Hereford, and Bangor, and the Roman Liturgy arranged in parallel columns, ■with preface and notes. By W. Maskell, M.A. Third Edition. Svo. 15s. Monumenta Ritualia Ecclesiae Anglicanae. The occasional Offices of the Church of England according to the old use of Salisbury, the Prymer in English, and other praj^ers and forms, with disserta- tions and notes. Second Edition. 3 vols. Svo. 2I. I OS. Warren. The Liturgy and Ritual of the Celtic Church. By F. E. Warren, B.D. Svo. 14s. Oxfotb AT THE CLARENDON PRESS LONDON: HENRY FROWDE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AMEN CORNER, E.G. Date Due ^^ '^ ,^malb>&^, '*'* »m ii m » m M ''km- BS1475.8.B81 Lectures on Ecclesiastes : delivered in Princeton Theological Seminary-Speer Library 1 1012 00051 7708 ■■'••W^v;-''':':''-:'' ^i^^^iv;i:fex:;i;;^j!i?t:?:y||