JO'iri^O:
,,...»^ **"•"»«' ^'^4'
PRINCETON, N. J.
Shelf-
BX 9184 .A5 M57 1886a
Mitchell, Alexander Ferrie
1822-1899,
Catechisms of the second
r pf or m;^t -i nn
.^.H OF PF f^
NOV ]0'^ ^
CATECHISMS M^OQiCALSt^
OF THE
SECOND REFORMATION
PART I.-THE SHORTER CATECHISM OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY
AND ITS PURITAN PRECURSORS.
PART II.-RUTHERFURD'S AND OTHER SCOTTISH CATECHISMS
OF THE SAME EPOCH.
WITH HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION
AND BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES
BY/
ALEXANDER F. MITCHELL, D.D.
PROFESSOR OF ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS
LONDON:
JAMES NISBET e^- CO., BERNERS STREET
1886.
TO THE MEMBERS
OF THE
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND
ANNO MDCCCLXXXV
THIS TREATISE IS RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED
BY
ALEXANDER F. MITCHELL
THEIR MODERATOR
PREFATORY NOTE.
This Treatise is intended to explain the composition and
sources of the Catechisms of the Westminster Assembly,
and to give specimens of the Catechisms which were
previously in use among the doctrinal Puritans in England
and Scotland, as well as of those which were drawn up
to be laid before the Assembly's Committee. It is the
necessary sequence of the treatises and articles I have
already published on the history of the Assembly, and in
explanation of their doctrinal standards. The great mass of
the catechetical manuals which had to be consulted in com-
piling it had to be sought for out of Scotland ; and, as it was
only at distant intervals I could prosecute my researches in
the English Libraries which contained them, the completion
of the volume has been delayed much longer than was
anticipated when it was first taken in hand. I shall
have no cause to grudge the time or trouble bestowed
on it if it shall prove in any measure helpful to my
brethren in the various Presbyterian Churches, and shall
be found to cast any fresh light on the history and meaning
VI PREFATORY NOTE.
of those Catechisms which they still love, or to explain the
reasons of the strong hold these have so long maintained
on the reverence and affection of young and old in our
Churches.
My best thanks are due to the authorities of the British
Museum, and of Sion College Library, in London; of the
Bodleian Library, in Oxford; of the Libraries of Trinity
and Emmanuel Colleges, Cambridge ; and of the Univer-
sity, the Advocates', and the New College Libraries in
Edinburgh, as well as to my friends, Professor Wright of
Cambridge and Professor Dickson of Glasgow, for the
facilities they have given or procured for me in the pro-
secution of my researches. My thanks are also due to
the Eev. Dr. Anderson and D. Hay Fleming, Esq., St.
Andrews, for the great trouble they have taken in revising
the proof-sheets.
ALEX. F. MITCHELL.
CONTENTS.
PAGE
Prefatory Note, ...... v
Introduction, ....... ix
Biographical Notices, ...... xxxix
Part I.
THE SHORTER CATECHISM OF THE WESTMINSTER
ASSEMBLY AND ITS PURITAN PRECURSORS.
The Shorter Catechism of the Westminster Assembly, reprinted
from an early English edition, and each answer compared
with answers in previous Puritan Catechisms, . . 1
Gouge's Brief Method of Catechising, .... 41
Eogers' Chief Grounds of Christian Keligion, ... 53
Ball's Short Catechism, ..... 65
Palmer's Endeavour of making the Principles of Christian
Keligion . . . plain and easy. Part i.. Questions and
Answers tending to explain the Articles of the Creed, . 93
Catechism by M. N., B.D. The second main part, explaining
the Ten Commandments, . . . . .119
Vlll CONTENTS.
PAGE
Ussher's Principles of Christian Religion, . . . 137
Austin's Parliament's Rules and Directions drawn into Questions
and Answers, ...... 151
iaart II.
RUTHERFURD'S AND OTHER SCOTTISH CATECHISMS.
Rutlierfurd's Catechism, ..... 161
Wyllie's Catechism, ...... 243
A Fragment (apparently by Mr. Robert Blair), . . 263
The A, B, C ; or A Catechism for Young Children, . . 267
The New Catechism, according to the form of the Church
of Scotland, ...... 277
INTRODUCTION/
The Catechisms of the Westminster Assembly, and
especially their Shorter Catechism, may be regarded as, in
several respects, the most remarkable of their symbolical
books, the matured fruit of all their consultations and
debates, the quintessence of that system of truth in which
they desired to train English-speaking youth, and faithful
training in which, I believe, has done more on both sides of
the Atlantic to keep alive reverence for the old theology
than all other human instrumentalities whatever.
It may be said, without exaggeration, of the catechisms
framed on the system of the doctrinal Puritans, and pub-
lished in England between the years 1600 and 1645, that
their name is legion. Perhaps no more convincing proof could
be cited of the great influence they were exercising through-
out these years of trial and oppression, and also of the
manner in which they came to acquire, retain, and increase
it, than that which is furnished by the floods of different cate-
chisms and different editions of the same catechism — often
five or six, in several cases ten or twelve, and in some cases
from twenty to thirty editions — being poured forth from the
London press in rapid succession. Among the members of
the Assembly there were at least twelve or fourteen who had
^ This Introduction is a revision and abridgment of the Lecture on the
Catechisms contained in my book on " The Westminster Assembly and
Westminster Standards."
h
X INTRODUCTION.
prepared and published catechisms of their own years before
the Assembly met, as Twisse, White, Gataker, Gouge,
Wilkinson, Wilson, Walker, Palmer, Cawdrey, Sedgewick,
Byfield, and possibly l^ewcomen, Lyford, Hodges, and Fox-
croft, to say nothing of Cartwright, Perkins, Ussher, Eogers,
and Ball, who somewhat earlier had prepared the way for
them, and whom several of them can be shown to have more
or less followed in their plan or in details.
The first step towards the preparation of a catechism may
be said to have been taken by the Assembly in December
1643,^ when Messrs. Marshall, Palmer, Goodwin, Young, and
Herle, with the Scottish Commissioners, were appointed a
committee to draw up a directory for public worship. That
treatise was intended to include a directory for catechising,
if not a formal catechism, and the preparation of the paper
on this subject was intrusted to Mr. Herbert Palmer.^ Not-
withstanding Palmer's great reputation as a catechist, his
paper, in the shape in which it was first presented, does not
appear to have come up to the expectations of the Scottish
Commissioners. Their chronicler tells us, " Mr. Marshall's
part anent preaching, and Mr. Palmer's about catechising,
though the one be the best preacher, and the other the best
catechist in England, yet we no ways like it ; so their papers
are passed in {i.e. into) our hands to frame them according
to our mind."^ This was written on 2d April 1644, and on
21st November of the same year he briefly records that "the
catechise is drawn up, and I think shall not take up much
time," and again, on 26th December, that "we have near[ly]
1 Baillie's Letters, vol. ii. p. 118.
2 Ihid. p. 140. 2
lUd. p. 148.
INTRODUCTION. xi
also agreed in private on a draught of catechism, where-
upon, when it comes into public, we expect little debate."
The natural inference from these notices seems to be that
the catechism then drawn up and nearly agreed on in
private, was either some one which had been drafted by
themselves in terms of the remit made to them — the cate-
chism published in 1644 for the benefit of both kingdoms,
or that of Eutherfurd, till now extant only in MS. — and
which they were prematurely counting on getting the
committee and the Assembly to accept without much dis-
cussion, or else that it was some modification of Mr. Palmer's
directory or catechism, such as we shall find reason to
believe they were willing, after consultation with their
friends in the North, to accept, at least in its method
and principles. Before this date the printed Minutes^ of
the Assembly show that Messrs. Marshall, Tuckney,
Newcomen, and Hill had been added to Mr. Palmer " for
hastening the catechism," and that on 7th February 1644-5
Messrs. Eeynolds and Delme were added, — of course in con-
junction with the Scotch Commissioners, who claimed the
right to be on all committees appointed to carry out any
part of the uniformity covenanted for between the Churches.
Among the catechisms which I examined cursorily in
1866 in the British Museum and in Sion College Library
was one bearing the title. An Encleavoitr of making Christian
Religion easie, and published at Cambridge in 1640 without
the author's name, but which, from Dr. Wallis's preface to
his Ex;planation of the Shorter Catechism, I concluded was
probably Palmer's. In it each of the principal answers is,
1 Page 12, 2d December 1644.
Xll INTRODUCTION.
by repetition of part of the question, made a complete and
independent proposition, and these principal answers are
broken down in a peculiar way into a series of subordinate
questions, all capable of being answered by the monosyllables
Ay or No. It did not then strike me as so similar to the
Westminster Catechisms in their ultimate form as it does
now, and not knowing then what we know now (that the
Minutes have been transcribed from the almost illegible
original) of the successive stages by which this ultimate
form was reached, I had almost forgotten all about it, till ten
years ago, when, as I ruminated over the notes of a very un-
intelligible debate in the Minutes, this fact came back to my
remembrance as one wdiich might enable me to cast light on
it. It was not my good fortune, however, to get back to the
British Museum till November 1879, and before that time
my attention, as well as that of others, had been called by
an Edinburgh bookseller to what is said by Dr. Belfrage on
the history of the Shorter Catechism in the introduction
prefixed to the second edition of his Practical Exposition of
the Assembly's Sliorter CatecJiism. This history was not con-
tained in the earlier edition of the book. Dr. Belfrage
appears to have seen Palmer's Catechism, and to have com-
pared it with the Assembly's, but his conclusion regarding it
coincided rather with my first impressions. He states, how-
ever, that Dr. M'Crie, on the ground of the passage quoted
above from Baillie, was disposed to come to the conclusion
that " Mr. Palmer was concerned in the first draft of the
Catechism." My friend Dr. Briggs, who also saw Palmer's
treatise wheii in London in 1879, early in the following year
save an interestino- account of its relations to the Shorter Gate-
INTRODUCTION. XlU
chism in the Preshyterian Revieiv for January 1880. I have
preferred to wait till I had leisure to make a further study
of most of the contemporary Puritan catechisms, and might
venture to speak of their relations with fuller knowledge.
I have now little doubt that the paper which Palmer gave
in to the Committee and to the Assembly in 1645, and which
occasioned the debate to which I have referred, was substan-
tially the same with the preface to his catechism. This
details the method which he had himself made use of in his
catechisings, and which many modern keys (as they are
called) to the Shorter Catechism have borrowed from him
or from Dr. John Wallis, who, without loss of time, applied
the system of his revered master to the new catechism which
the Assembly ultimately agreed on. The Scotch Commis-
sioners, when they first heard this paper, were not satisfied
with it ; and their impartiality therefore is the more highly to
be commended in regard to it. They had tlieniselves in the
meantime brought out " the Xew Catechism according to the
form of the Kirk of Scotland, published for the benefit of both
Kingdoms,"^ and perhaps in the hope that it might be adopted
as the common catechism. Yet when they had had time to
consider tlie subject more deliberately, and advise with their
friends in Scotland regarding it, they proved in the debate
to which I have referred, if not the only, certainly the most
prominent advocates of Palmer's method and peculiar form
of catechism. This memorable, but briefly recorded debate
occurred in the Assembly on the 13th of May 1645, probably
just after the fifth edition of Palmer's little treatise had
appeared. His efforts on that occasion were directed mainly
^ Published at London 1645.
XIV INTRODUCTION.
to securing the Assembly's approval of his method of cate-
chising rather than of the detailed contents of his catechism.
Yet, as I read the brief minutes of the debate, his efforts
were not crowned with success. The Scotch Commissioners,
Eutherfurd and Gillespie, spoke warmly in favour of his
method of catechising, — of the practice he adopted both of
making each principal answer a distinct and complete pro-
position, and of breaking down the principal answers by
subordinate questions which could all be answered by Ay
or No. His personal friend Delme gave the plan a sort of
general support, but all the other speakers, and among them
Messrs. Marshall and Eeynolds, two of the most prominent
members of his committee, while frankly acknowledging his
great skill and success as a catechist, and the good that
might come from ministers in their catechisings availing
themselves of his method, resolutely objected to have these
subordinate questions and answers reduced to rigid form,
and inserted in the public catechism.^ One can hardly con-
template without a shudder how near we were to missing
the most concise, nervous, and severely logical catechism in
our language had Mr. Palmer and the Scotch Commissioners
1 Minutes of Westmimter ^Assembly, pp. 91-94 — Mr. Marshall ; " I con-
fess that the pains which that brother that brought in the Keport [hath
taken] is both accepted with God and hath been blessed by him. . . .
But I Cleave leave to give a few dissenting thoughts to the method pro-
pounded." These were in substance that people would come to get up the
subordinate answers by rote as well as the principal ones, that good might
come of the catechiser himself breaking up the principal answers in the
method proposed, but not from their being inserted into the catechism and
learned by rote. He approved, however, of commending all this in the
preface to the catechism. Mr. Eeynolds : "We all agree that way which
is most for ingenerating knowledge is most to be used. But that this way
before you is the best way I cannot discern. [If] you resolve it shall be
INTRODUCTION. XV
at that time carried their point, and got these subordinate
questions and answers inserted in the catechism. I do not
think that was further pressed on the Assembly after this
date/ but Mr. Palmer continued to be so persuaded of its
excellence and importance that he determined with himself
that he would print upon his own method the catechism
which the Assembly should ultimately adopt, and, departing
to his rest ere that had been completed, he left his purpose,
as a sacred legacy, to be executed by his young friend Wallis.
He accordingly in 1648 published that explanation of the
Shorter Catechism on the model of Palmer's treatise, on
which, as already stated, several so-called keys to it have in
our own day been based.
On the first day of August 1645 a further report was
presented by the committee to the Assembly. The interval
may possibly have been employed in trying to put the
materials of Palmer's Catechism into more acceptable shape,
or to bring it nearer to the Scotch one (which, though more
brief, is framed on the same general plan), and to disencum-
ber it of all the subordinate questions to the formal insertion
of which objection had been taken. The only hints which
but a directory, then how shall those Ayes or Noes be of use ? . . . You
will obtain your end as well by setting it down in the preface to the cate-
chism." Seaman says there were two questions before them, the one
relating to a catechism, the other to the method of catechising, and that
the two should be kept distinct, and the minister not too strictly tied up
as to the latter. Palmer was somewhat dissatisfied with the result of the
debate, and said that if he had not a peculiar interest in the matter he
would have spoken more upon it.
^ Baillie, however, says at a later date : " We had passed a quarter of
the catechise and thought to have made short work with the rest : but
they are fallen into such mistakes and endless janglings about both the
method and the matter that all think it will be longsome work." — Letters,
vol. ii. p. 416.
xvi INTRODUCTION.
the Minutes supply to guide us are that there was a debate
as to whether the Creed should be expressed and probably-
made (as it was both in the Scotch and in Palmer's, and
several contemporary catechisms) the basis of the exposition
of the articles of Faith, or whether these articles should
be taken up in the systematic order more usually adopted in
strictly Puritan catechisms. There was also a debate con-
cerning God, which was one of the first articles in all the
catechisms of the period, whether they were framed on the
basis of the Apostles' Creed or on that of the commonly
received system of theology. But I conclude that the com-
mittee was not yet altogether of one mind,^ and that it was
on this account that, after debate on 20th August, it was
reconstituted, and Mr. Palmer, Dr. Stanton, and Mr. Young
were appointed to draw up the whole draft of the catechism
with all convenient speed. Either, however, they did not
proceed very speedily or they met with unexpected diffi-
culties in their undertaking, and on 22d July 1646, Mr.
Ward was adjoined to them. It was not till Uth September
1646 that their report was called for, nor till the afternoon
of Monday Uth September that it was actually presented;
and from that date on to the 4th January 1646-7 it was
from time to time taken up by the Assembly and passed as
far as the fourth commandment.^ On 1st December, how-
ever, before much of it had passed, a large addition was
again made to the committee, viz., Messrs. Whitaker, Nye,
and Byfield, and "the brethren who had been intrusted
with the methodising of the Confession of Faith," viz.,
Messrs. Eeynolds, Herle, jSTewcomen, Arrowsmith, and
1 Minutes, pp. 124, 125. 2 /j^-^, pp, 281-318.
INTRODUCTION. XVll
Tuckney. Most probably it was in consequence of these
changes on the epmmittee that on the 14th of January, on
a motion by Mr. Vines, it was ordered " that the committee
for the catechism do prepare a draught of huo catechisms,
one more large and another more brief, in the preparation of
which they are to have an eye to the Confession of Faith
and the matter of the catechism already begun," ^ or, as the
Scotch Commissioners report it in a letter to the Commis-
sion of their own Assembly, which bears unmistakable
evidence of being from the hand of Eutherfurd: "The
Assembly of Divines, after they had made some progress in
the catechism which was brought in to them from their
committee, and having found it very difficult to satisfy
themselves or the world with one form of catechism or to
dress up milk and meat both in one dish, have, after second
thoughts, recommitted the work that two forms of catechism
may be prepared, one more exact and comprehensive, another
more easie and short for new beginners." ^ The catechism
which liad already been so far passed was unquestionably
still on the basis of Palmer's, but a large portion of the
detailed historical explanations of the second part of the
creed, relating to the birth, life, death, and resurrection of
our Lord, was omitted, and in the exposition of the com-
mandments another basis is already plainly discernible,
^ Minutes, p. 321 ; also Baillie's Letters, vol. ii. p. 379.
- MS. Minutes of Commission. To the same effect, Gillespie says to
the Assembly in Edinburgh in August 1647, that the divines have found
great difficulty " how to make it full, such as might be expected from an
Assembly, and, upon the other part, how to condescend to the capacity
of the common and unlearned. Therefore they are a-making two distinct
catechisms — a short and plain one for these, and a larger one for those of
understanding." Appendix to Baillie's Letters, vol. iii. p. 452.
XVlll INTRODUCTION.
while a more pronounced Calvinistic character is given to
the doctrinal teaching. The variations from and additions
to individual answers can in general be still traced to other
contemporary catechisms, and the more important of them
to those of Ussher, on whose catechetical manuals (as on
his Articles of Eeligion for their Confession) the divines seem
to take pleasure in falling back, especially on all cardinal
questions. Even this partially-passed recension of a cate-
chism follows his and more strictly Puritan treatises rather
than Palmer's, in placing in the forefront the question and
answer as to the rule of faith, and in inserting another as to
the decrees of God ; and it is to the same source we have to
trace the questions and answers as to the covenants of works
and grace, the prophetical, priestly, and kingly offices of the
Eedeemer, and the effectual calling, justification, adoption,
the sanctification and perseverance of those who have been
made partakers of redemption, and even the detailed and
specific statements as to the sinfulness of the estate into
which man fell. All these, which make the Westminster
Catechisms what they ultimately became, are to be sought
outside of Palmer's Endeavour of making Christian Religion
easie, which the more they tried to adapt it to their purpose
the more they had to alter or supplement it ; and all these
are to be found in the distinctively Calvinistic catechisms
of Ezekiel Ptogers, John Ball, William Gouge, M. N. [New-
comen or Nicholl], and, to a considerable extent, in those
of Henry Wilkinson and Adoniram Byfield, as well as in
those of Archbishop Ussher. Of this I deem myself at
length entitled to speak with some confidence, having had the
opportunity of carefully comparing the answers in their
INTRODUCTION. XIX
manuals as well as in Palmer's with the definitions ultimately
inserted by the Assembly in one or other of its catechisms.
It was not till after the Scripture proofs for the Confession
of Faith were completed that the result of the labours of the
reconstituted committee in preparing a Larger Catechism
were called for. But, on 15th April 1647, the first portion
of them was presented to the Assembly and further portions
were from time to time presented and discussed till, on 15th
October of the same year, the Larger Catechism was finished,
substantially in the shape in which we still have it. The
doctrinal part of this manual, as every one who has care-
fully studied it knows, and as the resolution reconstituting
the committee prepares us to expect, is taken to a large
extent from the Confession of Faith. The explanation of
the ten commandments, and of the duties required and the
sins forbidden under each, is largely derived from Ussher's
Body of Divinity, Mcholl's and Ball's catechisms, and per-
haps also from Cartwright's Body of Divinity and some of
the larger practical treatises of Perkins. The exposition
of the Lord's Prayer has been got in part from the same
sources, in part also from Attersoll's, or some other catechism
based on Perkins's treatise on the Lord's Prayer, and like it,
supplying matter for confession of sin, as well as for prayer
more strictly so called, under each of the petitions of the
prayer. I can enter into particulars as to this derivation or
correspondence only in the most cursory way in this intro-
duction ; but in the collection of catechisms which follows
I have endeavoured to provide the materials for tracing
it out much more fully.
The first question or interrogation, which does not seem
XX INTRODUCTION.
to have appeared in the former draft of the committee,
is taken from the old English translation of Calvin's
Catechism, What is the principal and chief end of man's
life ? The answer to this question may be said to combine
the answers to Question 3d in the Catechisms of Calvin
and Ames, " To have his glory showed forth in us," and
" in the enjoying of God," and it may have been taken
from them ; or the first part may have been taken from
Rogers, Ball, or Palmer, and the second from an Italian
catechism of the sixteenth century.^ The second question
is one found in several contemporary catechisms, and the
answer to it is substantially taken from the Confession of
Faith. The third question, which in the former draft had
stood apparently at the head,^ is put here in a somewhat altered
shape, and the clause which had there been principal, and
again becomes so in the Shorter Catechism, is brought in
as subsidiary and thrown to the end of the answer. The
next question, relating to the proofs showing that the
Scriptures are the Word of God, is found in many Puritan -
catechisms, and the answer is abridged from the Con-
fession of Faith. The question as to what the Scriptures
principally or especially teach is found both in Paget's
and Ball's Catechism, and the answer in Ussher's Prin-
ciples of Christian Bdigioii. The next question, What do
the Scriptures make known of God ? and the answer,
are found in analogous forms in Rutherfurd's and some
other contemporary manuals. The answer to the question,
What is God ? ^ had in the former draft been taken from
^ " Goder' eterhamente Dio." - Minutes, p. 281.
^ " God is a most glorious being, infinite in all perfections."
INTRODUCTION. XXI
Palmer's work, with the exception that " perfection," in
the singular, had been changed into " perfections," in the
plural, as it had been in another catechism published
anonymously in the previous year. Here the former de-
scription is exchanged for one abridged apparently from
Ussher's Body of Divinity} The next answer, respecting
the properties or attributes of God, was at first distinct
from the previous one. Dr. Briggs supposes it may have
been got by crushing into one the answers to more than
a score of questions in Palmer's treatise ; and Dr. Matthews'
by a somewhat similar condensation of various answers in
Ball's larger catechism. But it is simply an abridgment of
a paragraph in Chapter II. of the Confession of Faith ;
and the ultimate answer of the Larger Catechism to the
question. What is God ? was got by joining these two
answers into one. The answer to the same question in the
Shorter Catechism is composed of the scriptural definition,
" God is a Spirit," with the incommunicable attributes
arranged in the same order as they were by Eogers, but in
adjectival form, and the communicable in substantive
form almost exactly as they had been given by Egerton.
But time will not admit of my prosecuting this minute
comparison further. The doctrinal definitions in the Larger
Catechism are, as I have said, in a great measure abridged
from the Confession of Faith, and so far as they are not
so they may generally be found in a shorter form in
Ball's and NichoU's catechisms, in more diffuse form in
Ussher's Body of Divinity} The same may be said even
^ " God is a spirit, infinite in being and perfection."
^ Dr. Schaff supposes that the treatise of Wollebius entitled Compen -
dmm Theologice or "An abridgement of Christian Divinity," may also
i
XXll INTRODUCTION.
more unreservedly of the exposition of the Ten Command-
ments and of the Lord's Prayer as concerns Mcholl and
Ussher. But owe of the most singular and unexpected dis-
closures brought to light in the recently published Minutes
of the Assembly is that, while the early draft of a catechism
in 1645 treated first of creclenda, then of the ten com-
mandments, and so left to the last the means of grace and
the Lord's Prayer, and while the Larger Catechism as finally
adjusted followed the same order, yet, as first entered on
the Minutes of the Assembly in 1647, it treats of the
means of grace or the word, sacraments, and prayer, before
it expounds the commandments. In this it resembles the
plan of Ball's and some other catechisms, showing that, if
not in details, yet in outline and method, the divines fol-
lowed some previous manual on the same plan as his
— possibly that small one of date 1542, attributed to
Calvin, — which, after being long lost, has been brought to
light recently by M. Douen, and printed as an appendix to
the second volume of his Hioguenot Psalter. At least they
follow its plan more exactly than that of Ball ; and the
statement of Baillie, given on page xv, is sufficient to show
that the question of method continued long to divide them.
Their detailed and elaborate answers in the several parts of
this catechism are, even when founded on previous treatises,
carefully matured expansions of the answers given in these.
I shall try to find room in the appendix to this introduction
for one specimen of these, furnished by the rules they have
provided for the exposition of the commandments, on the
have been consulted. • So also perhaps may the Exposition of the Heidel-
berg Catechism by Ursinns.
INTRODUCTION. xxiii
principles set forth in our Lord's Sermon on the Mount.
These rules had been more and more elaborated in the
larger Puritan catechisms from the days of Whitaker and
Cartwright to those of Ball and Ussher, and were finally-
brought as near to perfection as they could well be by Dr.
Gouge and Mr. Walker — the sub -committee appointed to
prepare them — and having the help of Dr. Tuckney, who
by that time was acting as chairman of the Committee
on the Catechism, and is supposed to have taken a very
special charge of the exposition of the ten commandments.
The Larger Catechism was completed on 15th October 1647,
read over in the Assembly on 20th by Dr. Burgess, and on
the 2 2d was carried to the two Houses^ by the Prolocutor
and the whole Assembly, when thanks were returned to
them " for their great labour and pains in compiling this
Long Catechism." It appears to have been presented in
manuscript to the Scottish General Assembly in July 1647,
so far as it was then completed, and on the 1 7th September
certain alterations desired by their Commission were made
at Westminster. It was approved in completed form by the
next General Assembly on 20th July 1648.^ It was pre-
sented to the English House of Commons with the proofs
on 14th April 1648.
The Shorter Catechism was not put in form till after the
Larger one had been virtually completed, though it embodies
more of the materials of the earlier manual, which had
partially passed the Assembly in 1646, and is less directly
drawn from the Confession of Faith than the other. Drs.
^ Lords' Journals, vol. ix. p. 488 ; Commons' Journals, vol. v. p. ,340.
'•^ Peterkin's Records of Kirk, p. 496.
XXIV INTRODUCTION.
Belfrage, Hetlierington, and the younger M'Crie, relying on
Neal's account, have stated that the Shorter one was first
completed and presented to Parliament. But Neal has
fallen into the error of overlooking the fact, that the Larger
Catechism, without proofs, was presented to Parliament on
22d October 1647, as well as with proofs on 14th April
1648, while the Shorter Catechism, without proofs, was only
sent up on 25th N'ovember 1647, and again with proofs
on 14th April 1648.^ The following are the brief notices
respecting it found in the Minutes of the Assembly.
On 5th August 1647, it was resolved (p. 408) " that the
Shorter Catechism shall be gone in hand with presently, by
a committee now to be chosen," and ordered that " the Pro-
locutor, Mr. Palmer, Dr. Temple, Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Greene,
Mr. Delme, shall be this committee." It was to meet the
same afternoon, and Mr. Palmer to take care of it, or be its
convener. On August 9th " a report of the Short Catechism
was made by Mr. Palmer, and Mr. Calamy and Mr. Gower
were added to the committee." ^ This is the last occasion
in which the Minutes notice the presence of Mr. Palmer in
the Assembly, and shortly after he fell into a serious illness
and died. On August 10th "Dr. Temple made report of
the Lesser Catechism." On September 8th Mr. Wilson was
added to the committee for the catechism, and the same day
Mr. Wilson made report of the catechism. On September
16th a further order was given to proceed with the little
catechism. It was not, however, till 1 9th October 1 647, when
the Larger Catechism was ready to be presented to the two
Houses of Parliament, that orders were given to Messrs.
1 Minutes, pp. 485, 492, oil. 2 mj^ ^^ 408-410.
INTRODUCTION. XXV
Tuckney/ Marshall, and Ward, finally to adjust the Shorter
one. Yet no doubt preparation was being made for it during
the interval by the committee previously appointed, pro-
bably along with Wallis, wlio ultimately attended the com-
mittee as its secretary, and who in all likelihood had been
privately assisting his friend Palmer with it during the last
weeks of his life.^ On 21st October the first report from
this new committee was brought in by Tuckney, and dis-
cussed. Some debate arose as to whether the word " sub-
stance," or rather the expression " one in substance," in the
answer to the question, " How many persons are there in the
Godhead ?" should be left out. This, we know, was not done,
but " one in substance " was changed into " the same in
substance," a closer rendering of the Nicene o/jLoovaco^;, and
the phrase " equal in substance, power and glory," originally
used in the Larger Catechism, was changed to the same form
as in the Shorter. No further particulars of the debates on
this catechism are given in the Minutes, but nothing save
formal business was transacted in the Assembly till it had
been finished. On 8th November it is recorded that the
commandments. Lord's Prayer, and creed were added to the
catechism, and on the following day that Mr. Eutherfurd
took his leave of the Assembly, receiving the thanks of the
Assembly through the Prolocutor for the great assistance
he had rendered to it in its labours and debates.^ On
1 Minutes, p. 485. Cambridge gave him leave of absence for a time.
^ He was evidently a jjrotege of Palmer, and had on his recommendation
been chosen as a fellow in Queens' College, Cambridge, of which Palmer
was master.
^ Minutes, pp. 487, 488. On loth October, when the completion
of the Larger Catechism Mas reported, Mr. Rutherfurd moved, and the
Assembly ordered, "that it be recorded in the scribes' books that the
C
XXVI INTRODUCTION.
the same day, Mr. Burgess and Mr. Cawdrey were added
to the committee, along with Wallis, for the review of the
catechism. All was again reviewed by the committee,
and discussed by the Assembly before the 25th November.
The brief statement originally prepared as a preface was
appended as a postscript. Messrs. Nye and Eeynor dis-
sented from the insertion of the Apostles' creed at the
end of the catechism, but possibly the terms of the post-
script just referred to, and the explanation added some days
later as to the sense in which the article " he descended
into hell" was to be understood, may have satisfied their
scruples.^ Though in Scotland, as elsewhere, this catechism
has been, and deservedly so, the most popular of all the
productions of the Assembly, it was the one with the elabora-
tion of which the Scotch Commissioners had least to do.
Henderson had left and had died before the Confession was
completed. Baillie left immediately after it was finished,
and took down with him to Scotland a copy, the first edition
of it, without proofs. Gillespie, after repeated petitions to
be allowed to return home, received permission to leave in
May 1647, when the proofs for the Confession had been
completed, but while the debates on the Larger Catechism
were still going on, and the answer to the question " What
is God ? " — with which his name has been traditionally asso-
Assembly hath enjoyed the assistance of the honourable, reverend, and
leai'ned commissioners from the Church of Scotland, in the work of the
Assembly during all the time of the debating aud perfecting the four
things mentioned in the Covenant, viz., the Directory for Worship, the
Confession of Faith, Form of Church-Government, and Catechism." —
Minutes, p. 484.
1 Ihid. pp. 490, 492.
INTRODUCTION. xxvii
ciated — had not as yet been adjusted for that Catechism,
much less for the Shorter one.^ Even Eutherfurd had been
seized with a fit of home-sickness, and wrote that he did not
think the elaboration of this catechism of sufficient impor-
tance to detain him from his college and his flock at St.
Andrews. At any rate, though persuaded to remain till it
had passed, so to speak, the first reading, he does not seem
to have left his distinctive mark on it. IsTot the faintest
trace of that wealth of homely imagery, which enriches the
MS. catechism attributed to him, is to be found in the Assem-
bly's Shorter Catechism. From first to last, in its clear, con-
densed, and at times almost frigidly logical definitions, it
appears to me to give unmistakable evidence of its Imving
passed through the alembic of Dr. Wallis, the great mathe-
matician, the protege and friend of Palmer, the opponent of
Hobbes and the Socinians, and probably the last survivor
of those connected with the great Assembly who was not
ashamed to speak of the benefit he had derived from its
^ Even three months after he left London all that he was able to report
to the Scottish Assembly respecting the catechisms was that the divines
" have had no time yet to do anything in the latter {i.e. shorter), but here
is the copy of the greater, ichichis almost comj^lete.'''' The only instance in
which we can be very sure that he has left his mark on the Confession is
in that passage in ch. xxi, of his Miscellany Questions, pointed out some
years ago by Professor Candlish as closely resembling chap. i. sect. v. of
the Confession. Tradition, no doubt, has associated the name of George
Gillespie with the answer to the question, " What is God ? " and the recent
editor of Henderson's Sermons has made a similar claim for him. But, so
far as the Minutes enable us to judge, the answer to that question, even
in the Larger Catechism, was not moulded into the shape in which we now
have it till after Henderson and Gillespie had returned to Scotland. It
still remained somewhat in the same form which it bears in the earliest
Catechism drafted by the Assembly, and in the catechetical manuals of
Cartwright and Ussher,
XXVlll INTRODUCTION.
discussions during the preparation of its Confession and
Catechisms, lono- after he had conformed to the Church of the
Restoration, and taken to another line of study. Wodrow and
both the M'Cries seem to look on the claim of AVallis with
a certain amount of favour, while Dr. Belfrage refers to a
" theologian of great research " wdio favours that of Arrow-
smith ; but that divine does not appear to have been a member
of the committee, or in attendance on the Assembly, at the
time this manual was prepared.
The Shorter Catechism contains, as I have already ex-
plained, more of the materials of the catechism partially
passed by the Assembly in 1646, but not in a shape
which brings them nearer to the form of Palmer's original
work. On the contrary, it is a thoroughly Calvinistic and
Puritan catechism, the ripest fruit of the Assembly's thought
and experience, maturing and finally fixing the definitions of
theological terms to wdiich Puritanism for half a century had
been leading up and gradually coming closer and closer in
its legion of catechisms. It differs in one or two things even
from the Larger Catechism, composed just before it. Its
second question as to the rule of faith, if in more concise
form than the third question of the other, is more direct and
emphatic. Its definition of God is more happy, and, as
already mentioned, is from a different source. It does not
insert its definitions of faith and repentance where the other
has them, but holds them over till its third part, when it
comes to treat of the way of salvation and the means of
grace. And while, as I have said, it is a thoroughly Calvin-
istic catechism,- it has nothing of church censures, church
courts, or church officers, as many similar productions of the
INTRODUCTION. XXIX
Puritans have. Na}', it does not even have a definition of
the Church, whether visible or invisible, like the Larger
Catechism and the Confession of Faith, but only an incidental
reference to it in connection with the answer to the question,
" To whom is baptism to be administered ? " It would seem as
if in this their simplest yet noblest symbol the Assembly
wished, as far as Calvinists could do so, to eliminate from
their statements all that w^as subordinate or unessential — all
relating to the mere organisation of Christians as an external
community — all in which they differed from sound Protes-
tant Episcopalians on the one hand, and from the less un-
sound of the Sectaries on the other, and to make a supreme
effort to provide a worthy catechism in which all the
Protestant youth in the land might be trained. So highly
was the effort appreciated at the time that the king
(no doubt with the sanction of Ussher and his fellow-
chaplains), in some of his latest negotiations with the
Parliament, offered to license it, while still hesitating to
accept the Directories for Public Worship and for Church
Government as they had been drawn up by the Assembly.
It was no sooner passed by the Parliament and published
than it became widely popular in England, and it maintained
its popularity in a wonderful degree even after the sad
reverses which befel its authors in 1662. For more than a
century after that, it was the most widely recognised manual
of instruction, not only among Presbyterians but also among
the other orthodox dissenters. The Independents used it
both in England and in America. The Baptists used it with
a very few alterations, and in tlie 18th century that great
evangelist, John Wesley, who was ever ready to adapt to his
XXX INTRODUCTION.
own purposes good books prepared by others holding opinions
considerably different from his own, allowed it to circulate
among his societies in a modified form. It was early trans-
lated into Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and it has been retranslated
in our own day into Hebrew, Syriac, and modern Greek, and
into most modern languages both in the east and the west.
When about twenty-eight years ago I visited the Lebanon
schools, in the neighbourhood of Beyrout, I was greatly
interested to find that the American missionaries not only
taught this old catechism to the Druse and Maronite children,
but also taught it in the old Scottish form which was still com-
mon in last century but has now all but disappeared from the
schools in Scotland. It formed, in fact, their first reading-
book and had the A B C at the beginning, and a syllabary
corresponding to our a, b, ab ; e, b, eb, etc., but of course all
in orthodox Arabic.
The guiding principle of the Assembly and its Committee
in its composition was that announced by Dr. Seaman in one
of the earliest debates about it, viz., " That the greatest care
should be taken to frame the answer not according to the
model of the knowledge the child hath, but according to that
the child ouo'ht to have." And if too little care was taken
in former times to teach it intelligently to the young, and
gradually to open up its full meaning to them, yet, as Dr.
M'Crie has well observed, "the objection was pushed too far
when it was maintained that without a full scientific under-
standing of its doctrines it is useless to acquire familiarity
with their phraseology and contents. The pupil must learn
the rudiments of Greek and Latin long before he can com-
prehend the use of them, or apply them as a key to unlock
INTRODUCTION. XXXI
the treasures of ancient learning [in fact, in all Churches he
is first taught his Christian creed in this way], and experience
has shown that few who have been carefully instructed in
our Shorter Catechism have failed to discover the advantage
of becoming acquainted in early life, even as a task, with
that admirable form of sound words." For three quarters of
a century past, I do not believe that intelligent teachers of
the Catechism have been rare, either in the parochial or in
the Sabbath schools of Scotland, and with the helps with
which Gall and others, who have drawn on the older stores
of Wallis and Palmer and Lye, have provided them, there is
no excuse for any teacher making the study of it an irksome
task, or failing in a good measure to bring it down to the
capacities and home to the hearts of his pupils. I am but
fulfilling a simple duty when I thus publicly express my
deep gratitude to my teachers, both in the day-school and in
the Sabbath-school, for the uniform pains they took to make
the study of it interesting and attractive. I can confidently
affirm that I found their instructions of no small advantage
when I proceeded to the more systematic study of theology,
and I shall never lose hope of the living orthodoxy of the
Presbyterian Churches while their rising ministry and Church
members are intelligently and aff'ectionately trained in the
Shorter Catechism, and set themselves to train their flocks
in it earnestly and affectionately, as good old Principal Hill
used to recommend them to do.
In the first part of the following collection I have given
the text of this much-prized Catechism from one of the
earliest English editions, and have endeavoured pretty
fully to trace out the sources of its several answers in earlier
XXXll INTRODUCTION.
Catechisms, or at least to indicate the many points of contact
and resemblance between these answers and those of earlier
Puritan treatises, several of which had proceeded from mem-
bers of the Assembly. And I have added in whole or in part
those manuals which seem to have been most closely followed
and deserve to be most carefully compared. The exercise
has been interesting to myself, and I trust its results will
not be uninteresting to many of my brethren. It shows how
gradually in the stream of successive catechisms those de-
finitions of theological terms which were ultimately to
be perfected and crystallised, so to speak, at Westminster,
were developed and matured, and more and more widely
accepted. I cannot, within the limits to which this intro-
duction must be restricted, enter into details ; but I may say
generally, that so far as plan and the order of the questions
or interrogatories is concerned, I still regard the little cate-
chism of Ezekiel Eogers, who was a minister first in York-
shire, and latterly in New England, as most closely resembling
the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. The answers in his little
treatise are much more simple and elementary, the exposi-
tion of the ten commandments is in the briefest possible
form, and the verbal coincidences in individual answers
are few. But all is there in miniature, and almost all in
the same order as in the later and fuller catechism. The
plan of M. N.'s (as I suppose, Nicholl's or Newcomen's)
Catechism is very similar also, the execution is much more
detailed, especially in the exposition of the command-
ments, and particular answers frequently coincide in expres-
sion as well as in general meaning witli those of the
Shorter Catechism. The chief deviation is, that it, like
INTRODUCTION. XXXUl
that of the Church of England and several of the more
moderate Puritan catechisms, begins by reminding the
catechumen of his baptism, and of the privileges and
responsibilities connected with it. Next perhaps in point of
resemblance stand the catechisms of Gouge and Ball. The
author of the former was, like Newcomen, an influential
member of the Assembly, and his treatise has many verbal
coincidences with that prepared by them, but it deviates so
far from it in plan by placing the exposition of the com-*^
mandments before the explanation of the doctrines of the
Christian faith. A similar remark applies to Bali's treatise,
entitled a Shorter Catechism. It has decidedly more verbal
coincidences with the Assembly's Shorter Catechism in the
answers to particular questions, but it deviates further in
plan, treating first of doctrine, then of the means of grace,
preaching, prayer, exposition of the Lord's Prayer and of the
sacraments, of the Church and Church censures, and finally
expounding the commandments, and concluding with a few (^
general questions. Palmer's catechism, as already stated,
is similar in general plan, with the exception that, like the
Anglican Catechism, it treats of prayer and the Lord's
Prayer before it treats of the sacraments, and that it moulds
its exposition of doctrine closely on the Apostles' Creed. It
was unquestionably on the basis of the first part of it that
the divines began to work in 1645, but so many of its
historical questions have been omitted in the course of
their successive revisions, and so much that was needed
to explain and define important doctrines of the Christian
system has been added, that the similarity is not now so
marked in that first part, much less in the other parts, as,
XXXI V INTRODUCTION.
from the fact mentioned, one might have expected. The
only trace the Shorter Catechism perhaps now bears of having
been moulded on one which had the Apostles' Creed for the
basis of its first or doctrinal part, is, that at the close of that
part it takes account only of the eternal state of believers.
But, strange as the fact may seem, it deviates in this from
Palmer's, and from almost every other catechism — Nicholl's,
however, as in so many other things, coming nearest to
it. The only way in which one, who knows how strongly
its authors s]3eak in other parts of the desert of sin and the
endless misery in reserve for the impenitent, can account for
no reference being made to these topics in this place is, that
the divines were expounding the last article of the Apostles'
Creed, and had in view only the case of those who could
truly say, " I believe in the resurrection of the body, and the
life everlasting," and did not deem themselves bound even
incidentally to advert to the future of those who had neither
part nor lot in Christ and His great salvation.
In the second part of this work I have given two of the
Scottish catechisms of the period which were actually in
use. One of these was published in England, just before the
Assembly entered on this part of its labours, and (I can
hardly doubt) in the hope that it might tend to facilitate
them. The catechism of Eutherfurd and the two others,*
^ They are still preserved in a MS. in the library of the University of
Edinburgh, to which the curators of the library have kindly given me
access. The first of these is entitled "Ane Catechisme conteining
the soume of Christian Religion, by Mr. Samuell Eutherfurd." The
second bears the title, " Another, b}' Mr. Thomas AVylie," probably the
same who was minister first at Borgue, and afterwards at Mauchline.
The third, which is quite fragmentary, containing only the two articles of
"Man's Delivery," and of the "Birth of Eegeneration," bears no title ; but
INTRODUCTION. XXXV
whicli have never hitherto been published, have been added
partly from their origin and worth, and the interest which
must ever attach to them on both accounts, and partly
because there can be hardly any doubt that they also were
prepared for the purpose of being laid before the committee of
the Assembly, and in the hope they might meet its approval.
In this, however, the hopes and wishes of the Scotch Com-
missioners were doomed to disappointment. And they seem
to have borne the disappointment well — Eutherfurd especially
so, and to have aided very cordially in the elaboration of
those which were ultimately framed and adopted.
The title sanctioned by the English Parliament for the
Shorter Catechism was not that originally fixed on by the
Assembly itself, and by which it is now universally known,
but the following expansion of it : — " The grounds and
Principles of Eeligion contained in a Shorter Catechism t-
(according to the advice of the Assembly of Divines sitting
at Westminster), to be used throughout the kingdom of
both the handwritmg, and the fact that it is written on the back of a
letter addressed "To the Right Reverend Mr. Robert Blair, minister of
God's Word at St. Andrews, in Scotland," seem to warrant our ascribing
it to that eminent man, who from 1639 had been Rutherfurd's colleague
in St. Andrews. The late Mr. David Laing believed that the first of these
is in the handwriting of Rutherfurd, and there is strong internal evidence
that it must have been drawn up by him. The spelling and diction are
somewhat antique, but a careful perusal will satisfy most that it would
be difficult to name any one among the worthies of that age, save the
author of the Letter^i, who could have drawn up a Catechism so rich in
imagery, so full and practical in all that relates to the origin and progress
of the divine life in the soul, containing so many of his favourite modes of
expression, arid so thoroughly moulded according to the system expanded
in his larger theological Morks. Wylie's Catechism is, to a large extent,
an abridgment of Rutherfurd's, but exhibits sufficient internal evidence
of distinct authorship. That of Blair is only a fragment, Imt it seems to
be part of an independent treatise.
XXXVl INTRODUCTION.
England and dominion of Wales." ^ This seems to have met
with the approval of the divines. At least ten or twelve
editions of it with this title were published in England
before 1720, one of which I have now secured.
Between 21st October and 19th November the Catechism
may be said to have passed the first and second reading in
the Assembly, and, without the proofs, it was presented to
the House of Commons on the 25th, and to the House of
Lords on the 26th November. It was presented with proofs
on 14th April 1648, and by 25th September 1648 it had
been passed by the Houses, with the above title. It was
approved by the General Assembly of the Church of Scot-
land on 28th July 1648, and their Acts in regard to it and
the Larger Catechism were ratified by the Estates of the
Scottish Parliament on 7th February 1649. No express
mention is made of it or of the Larger Catechism in the Act
re-establishing Presbytery after the Eevolution, but it has
always retained its place of honour in the Presbyterian
Churches in Scotland, and elsewhere, as the most widely
known and most greatly valued of our doctrinal symbols.
Richard Baxter's opinion of this Catechism was very high,
and his testimony to its merits very emphatic : " I do heartily
approve," he says, " of the Shorter Catechism of the Assembly
and of all therein contained, and I take it for the best cate-
chism that ever I yet saw, and the answers continued (that is,
I suppose, read continuously) form a most excellent summary
of the Christian faith and doctrine, and a fit test to try the
orthodoxy of teachers themselves." Nay, he adds that,
" for the innate worth of it, he prefers it to any of the
^ For procedure of the Houses respecting it see Minutes of Assembly, p. 511,
INTRODUCTION. XXXvii
writings of the Fathers, and that he takes the labours of the
Assembly, and especially the confession and catechisms, as
the best book next his Bible in his study." The sainted
Leighton seems also to have had a high opinion of it, and
admits that the thoughts we find in it on the awful subject
of the divine decrees "are few, sober, clear, and certain."
Principal Hill speaks with high commendation of the Cate-
chism and the system of teaching it followed by the ministers
of his day : " Considered as a system of divinity," he says,
"this catechism is entitled to much admiration. It has
nothing superfluous; the words are chosen with uncommon
skill, and the answ^er to almost every question is a text on
which a person versant in such subjects can easily enlarge,
. . . and in the hands of an experienced, attentive examiner
. . . the catechism may be made completely to answer the
purpose of leading the people to the apprehension of Christian
doctrine and of the extent of Christian duty."
The opinion of Dr. Schaff in our own day, if, as becomes a
German, somewhat more guarded than Baxter's, is hardly
less remarkable. He says : " The Shorter Catechism is one
of the three typical catechisms of Protestantism which are
likely to last to the end of time. It is fully equal to Luther's
and to the Heidelberg Catechism in ability and influence ; it
far surpasses them in clearness and careful wording (or, as
he elsewhere says, in brevity, terseness, and accuracy of"
definition), and is better adapted to the Scottish and Anglo-
American mind ; but it lacks their genial warmth, freshness,
and child-like simplicity." Perhaps quite as noteworthy are
the words he quotes from Carlyle, who, when testifying
against modern materialism, thus expressed himself : " The
xxxviii INTRODUCTION.
older I grow — and I now stand upon the brink of eternity
— the more conies back to me the first sentence in the
Catechism, which I learned when a child, and the fuller and
deeper its meaning becomes: 'What is the chief end of
ji^ian ? — To glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.' "
BRIEF BIOGRAPHICAL XOTICES
of the Authors of the Catechisms here reprinted, and of some
others who wrote Catechisms who were members of the West-
minster Assembly or of its Committee on the Catechism. ^
THE EEV. EZEKIEL ROGERS.
EzEKiEL Rogers, son of Richard and brother of Daniel
Rogers, was born at AYethersfield, Essex, in 1590. He entered
the University in his thirteenth year, and in his twentieth took
his degrees in Arts. After being for six years domestic chaplain
to Sir Francis Barrington, he was j^resented by him to the
benefice of Rowley, in Yorkshire. His church was situated in the
centre of a number of villages which supplied him with a large
congregation, and many were brought to the knowledge of the
truth as it is in Jesus, under his ministry. Brook tells us
that "by the encouragement or connivance of Archbishop
Matthews of York, the lectures or prophesyings, j)ut down in
the days of Queen Elizabeth, were again revived." These lectures
were the means of diffusing the light of the Gospel into many
dark corners of the land, particularly in Yorkshire. The ministers
within a certain district held their monthly assemblies, when
one or two of them preached, and others praj^ed, before a
numerous and attentive congregration. Mr. Rogers took an
active part in these exercises as long as the archbishop lived.
From one of these public lectures, a vile accuser waited upon the
archbishop, and charged one of the ministers with having
prayed, '' that God would shut the archbishop out of heaven."
The worthy prelate, who had a keen sense of humour, instead
of being offended, as the slanderer expected, only smiled, and
said, " Those good men know well enough that if I were gone
to heaven, their exercises would soon be put down." The
' These notices are compiled chiefly from Wood's Athcme. Oxonienses,
Brook's Lives of the Puritans, Palmer's Nonconformists' Memorial, Reid's
Lives of the Westminster Divines, Neal's History, Killen's History of the
Church in Ireland, &c.
xl BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
words of the good archbishop were, indeed, found true ; for his
head was no sooner laid in the dust than they were put down.
Mr. Rogers, having preached at Rowley about thirty years, was
silenced for nonconformity ; but, as some kind of recompence, he
was allowed the profits of his living for two years, and per-
mitted to put another in his place. He made choice of one
Mr. Bishop for his successor ; who, for refusing to read publicly
the censure passed upon Mr, Rogers, was himself presently
"silenced." In 1638, having no prospect of restoration to the
ministry in his own country, Mr. Rogers embarked, along with
a number of his Yorkshire friends, at Hull, for New England.
On arriving there he settled at a place which, after the name of
his Yorkshire charge, he termed Rowley. At that place he
continued his ministry for many years with great success. His
conversation among his people was earnest and edifying. He took
great pains in the religious instruction of the young — " he was a
tree of knowledge from which even children might pluck and eat
without harm." Nor was he forgetful of the need of the higher
education in such a new and growing community, and before his
death he was able to make such provision for it as should cause
him to be held in lasting remembrance by the descendants of
the New England colonists. His later years were clouded by
many trials and sufferings. He died in 1660, in the seventieth
year of his age. He left his library and other benefactions to
Harvard College, and made provision for the support of a
minister of the Gospel at Rowley. His catechism, entitled The
Chief e Grounds of Christian Religion set down by tvay of Catechising,
was composed while its author was still on this side of the
Atlantic, and probably ere he was suspended from his ministry
in Yorkshire, for it purports to have been '' gathered long since
for the use of an honourable family." The only copies of it
which I have seen are one in the British Museum and another in a
volume of Puritan catechisms belonging to the library of the
New College in Edinburgh. This last bears the date of 1642.
As I have said elsewhere, it contains in miniature almost all
that is in the Shorter Catechism of the Westminster Assembly.
It is decidedly similar to it in plan and type of doctrine, though
the verbal coincidences are by no means so numerous as in some
of the other catechisms reprinted in this volume.
REV. JOHN BALL. xli
THE EEV. JOHX BALL.
John Ball was born at Cassenton, in Oxfordshire, of humble
parents. He entered Brasenose College in 1602, and took
his degree in Arts in 1608. In 1610 he was ordained in
London by an Irish bishop without the subscriptions then
required in England, and was appointed minister at Whitmore,
near Newcastle-under-Lyne. His stipend is said to have been
but £10 a year, and he was obliged to eke out a scanty sub-
sistence by teaching a school or acting as chaplain and tutor
in a gentleman's family in the neighbourhood. He was a
moderate Puritan, but opposed to separation from the Church ;
and in later life he wrote against the extreme views of some
of his own party regarding the Liturgy and ceremonies of
the Church. He suffered much for his nonconformity and
" holding conventicles," as his preachings in private houses were
termed ; but he also experienced much kindness at the hands
of Lady Bromley, a great patroness of the Nonconformists in
that quarter. He was deeply versed in the Popish and
Arminian controversies, felicitous in the explanation of difficult
texts, and successful in comforting the distressed in conscience.
" He excelled greatly in prayer, administering the sacraments,
and- conducting the exercises of family religion. He died on
20th October 1640, saying, 'I am going to heaven.'" Brook
gives a full and laudatory account of him. Men of such diverse
opinions as Antony Wood, Fuller, and Neale have supplied
brief but very favourable notices of him; and Baxter, com-
menting, like the others, on his straitened income and high
qualities of head and heart, says, *' he deserved as high esteem
and honour as the best bishop in England." His chief work,
published during his lifetime, bore the title, A Treatise, of Faith,
divided into two parts, the first shoicing the Nature, and the second the
Life of Faith, etc. It was long held in high esteem, and passed
through two or three editions; a copy in my own possession
belonged to the well-known Lady Glenorchy. Ball also, as has
been mentioned above, published several treatises against the
Separatists and the more extreme Puritans. But the most
valuable of his writings, in a theological point of view, was that
d
xlii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
published, iifter his Jeatli in 1645, by Mr. Simeon Ashe, and
entitled, A Treatise of the Covenant of Grace. This treatise shows
incontrovertibly that there was a fully developed " doctrine of
the Covenants" taught in Britain before the time of the AVest-
minster Assembly, and apparently more harmoniously accepted
than that which soon after was promulgated by Cocceius, and
gave rise to such bitter controversy in Holland. The recom-
mendatory notice, prefixed to the book by Calamy, Reynolds,
and other divines of the Assembly, makes reference to his
catechism and the exposition thereof, so that, unquestionably,
both of these were well known and esteemed by several of the
leading members of the Assembly. His catechism, entitled
A Short Catcchisme contayning the Principles of Religion, had passed
through twelve editions by 1628, and through thirty-four by
1653. It was translated into some foreign languages. William
Seaman, M.D., son of Dr. Lazarus Seaman, who translated the
Shorter Catechism of the Assembly into Hebrew, translated
Ball's Catechism into Turkish. His larger catechism, entitled
A Short Treatise contaymng all the principall Grounds of Christian
Religion, was at first a simple exposition of the several questions
in his " short catechism;" but, after it had been passed through
two or three editions, it also was digested into the form of ques-
tions and answers subordinate to those of the other work. This
was done either by the author himself or by one of his collabora-
teurs, and the exposition in this form passed through several
editions. A copy of it was discovered about Philadel^jhia in
our own time, and a large sum was demanded for it by the
fortunate possessor ; but the book is not by any means a rare
one, and does not usually command a large price in Britain.
ARCHBISHOP JAMES USSHER.
James Ussher was born in Dublin on 4tli January 1580-1.
His father was one of the clerks of Chancery. His uncle was
Archbishop of Armagh. He is said to have been first taught to
read by his aunts, who had been blind from their cradles, but
had such tenacious memories that they could repeat almost any
portion of the Scriptures. At eight years of age he was trans-
ferred to the grammar school, and profited greatly by the
ARCHBISHOP USSHER. xliii
instructions of the two able Scotchmen who had charge of it.
At thirteen he passed to the University, and is said to have
been the first who enrolled in the new institution. He pro-
secuted his studies there with great enthusiasm and success,
distinguishing himself equally by his high talents and unremit-
ting application. He devoted himself with special zest to the
study of theology under the guidance of Travers, the well-
known Puritan opponent of Hooker. " When a mere boy, Ussher
was brought under deep religious impressions ; and throughout
life he maintained the character of a man of undoubted and
consistent godhness. When but a youth of eighteen he ventured
to encounter Henry Fitzsymonds, a learned Jesuit, in a public
disputation on the questions debated between Romanists and
Protestants. He acquitted himself with such dexterity and
skill that, after two or three conferences, the Jesuit withdrew
from the arena. This affair had probably some influence in
shaping his future line of study ; for, some time afterwards, he
commenced a laborious examination of the works of the Chris-
tian Fathers. For eighteen years he was employed in this
herculean task. Every day he devoted so many hours to the
perusal of them, and he thus in the end became more profoundly
acquainted with patristic literature than perhaps any other
theologian of the seventeenth century." Nor was he less at
home in the theology of the Reformation ; and he had for his
life-long correspondents the most eminent ministers of the
French and Dutch Reformed Churches. Before he was
admitted to the lowest office in the ministry he was permitted
to preach on the Romish controversy in one of the Dublin
cathedrals, in presence of the members of the Irish Government ;
and when only twenty-one years of age he was ordained deacon
and priest on the same day. He became M.A. in 1600, B.D. in
1607, and D.D. in 1612. He received his first appointment
from Archbishop Loftus, and in 1607 he was promoted to be
Professor of Divinity, and in 1610 Provost of Trinity College,
Dublin. In 1621 he was appointed by King James to the
bishopric of Meath, and in 1625 to the archbishopric of Armagh.
In 1615, when the first Irish Convocation met, and signalised
itself by the adoption of detailed doctrinal articles, Ussher was
the divine intrusted with the compilation of this important
xliv BIOGRArHICAL NOTICES.
symbol, which is a fjxir sample of his theology. "It consists of
one hundred and four articles, divided into nineteen sections,
and is thoroughly evangelical in its tone. It sets forth with
great distinctness those views of the Divine decrees so lucidly
propounded by Augustine and Calvin. It teaches that the
Scriptures are able to instruct sufficiently in all points of
doctrine and duty, and that we are justified by faith without
our own works or deservings. It makes no mention of the
three orders of bishops, priests, and deacons. It asserts that
the Lord's Day is wliolly to be dedicated unto the service of
God, and that the Bishop of Eome is that man of sin foretold
in the Holy Scriptures, whom the Lord shall consume with the
breath of His mouth, and abolish with the brightness of His
coming. This elaborate formulary, when adopted, was signed
by Jones, Archbishop of Dubhn ; by the Prolocutor of the other
House of the Clergy, in their names ; and by the Lord-Depute
Chichester, in name of the Sovereign." It is undoubtedly the
main source from which the Westminster Confession is drawn.
When he became a bishop, Ussher "made it his business
to reclaim those deluded people who had been bred up in the
Eoman Catholic religion from their infancy ; for which end he
began to converse more frequently and more familiarly with
the gentry and nobility of that persuasion, as also with diverse
of the inferior sort that dwelt near him, inviting them often to
his house, and discoursing with them with great mildness of the
chief tenets of their religion ; by which gentle usage he was
strangely successful in convincing many of them of their errors,
and bringing them to the knowledge of the truth. . . . He
listened with interest to the reports of the great revival under
the Scottish ministers in Down and Antrim ; . . . invited Blair
to his house at Drogheda, treated him during his visit with
marked kindness, obtained from him a minute account of his
theological sentiments, and was gratified to find that his guest
held identically his own views of the articles of the Christian
Faith. He stated that he had been importuned to stretch forth
his hand against them : he declared, though he would not for
the world do -that, he was afraid instruments would be found
to undertake it ; and he added that it would break his heart if
their successful ministry in the north were interrupted." But
DR. WILLIAM TWISSE. xlv
with all his noble qualities and immense learning, he was
more of a scholar than an administrator and ecclesiastical leader,
and for some years fell to a certain extent under the fascination
of that singular little man, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who,
with a narrow^er mind, a more superficial scholarship, and a far
less healthy form of piety, had acquired the art of governing-
men, and bore in his busy brain the burden of all the Churches
in Britain. After the fall of Laud, Ussher strove in vain to
repair the mischief he had wrought, and to turn the thoughts of
men towards peace and accommodation. He finally left Ireland
in 1640, remained for tw^o years in London, and then removed
to Oxford. He left Oxford in 1645, and, after spending rather
more than a year in Wales, he returned to London in June
1646, and was again appointed a member of the Assembly.
Soon after he was chosen preacher at Lincoln's Inn, and con-
tinued to officiate there till his si^ht and strens-th failed him.
During these years he found a home with the Countess of Peter-
l:)orough, whose husband many years before he had been honoured
to bring over to the Protestant faith. He died on 26th March
1656, and was honoured by the Protector with a public funeral.
The earliest editions of his two small catechisms which I have
seen are those in the British Museum, published in 1645 and
1646 ; but they were composed by him in early life — probably
like the Body of Dkinitij, which bears his name, while he
was teaching theology in Dublin. But the catechisms were
owned and revised by him in later life, while the larger treatise
does not seem to have been owned by him save as a compilation
which in early life he had made from the writings of others,
who were then in repute as orthodox divines, and not as an
accurate representation of his own matured opinions.
THE REV. WILLIAM TWISSE, D.D.
William Twisse, or Twiste, is said on his father's side to
have been of German descent, but he was born at Speenham-
Land, near Xewbery, in Berkshire, in 1575. He w^as educated at
Winchester School, and, like other Wykehamists, was transferred
from it to New College, Oxford, where he became M.A., and a
fellow in 1604. He then took orders, and prosecuted the study
xlvi BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
of theology for a number of years, and is said to have assisted
Sir John Savile in bringing out his edition of Bradwardine's
great work, De Causa Dei contra Pelagmm. In 1614 he took
his doctor's degree, and went abroad as chaplain to the Princess
Elizabeth, daughter of James VI. and wife of the Elector
Palatine. He returned to England after a few years, and be-
came vicar, or perpetual curate, of Newbery, his native parish.
In 1626 he refused to read the proclamation regarding the
Book of Sports, and wrote a treatise on the morality of the
Fourth Commandment ; but on account of his great eminence,
and the esteem in which he was held by foreign Protestants, he
was borne with, while others who followed a similar course
were harshly treated. On the outbreak of the civil war he was
urged by Prince Eupert, the son of Princess Elizabeth, to cast
in his lot with the king ; but he declined to do so, and his house
and library in consequence were pillaged by the Royalist troops,
and he had for safety to withdraw from his parish and seek
shelter in London. He was put by the Committee on Plundered
Ministers into the sequestrated rectory of St. Andrew's, Hol-
born. In 1643 he was named by the Parliament as a member,
and appointed Prolocutor of the Westminster Assembly, and
occasionally, at least in the debates on the English articles, he
took part in the discussions of the Assembly. He did not
come up to Baillie's idea of what the moderator of such an
Assembly should be ; but if vast learning, subtile speculative
genius, and European fame could give claims to such an office,
his were undoubted, and possibly in the matters for which
Baillie blames him he only followed the traditions of the Prolo-
cutor of the English Convocation, or of the Speaker of the
English House of Commons. He belonged to the Supralap-
sarian school of Calvinists, and published several learned and
voluminous works in Latin against the Arminians and Jesuits,
which commanded the admiration of Bishop Hall. In several
of the debates of the Assembly on the English articles he, like
Gataker, evinced considerably more liberality than might have
been expected from an adherent of so pronounced a school.
His little catechism was first issued in 1633, apparently
without his name, and of that edition there are copies in
various public libraries. The only copy of the sul)sequent
REV. JOHN AVHITK. xlvii
edition bearing his name which I have seen is in the British
Museum. It seems to have been very little consulted by the
Committee on the Catechisms. The one or two answers in
which there is any resemblance to that which was the fruit of
these long labours will be found noted under the respective
questions, pp. 23, 24, 26.
Twisse continued to oflSciate at Holborn, and occasionally at
least to attend the Assembly at Westminster, till one day he
fell down in the pulpit when preaching, and, after a lingering
illness of nearly a year's duration, died in 1646. The deputa-
tion of the Assembly who visited him on his deathbed found
him " in great straits," — the allowance promised by the Parlia-
ment having been very irregularly paid to him, as also the
income from his sequestration. His last words are said to have
been — "Now I shall have leisure to follow my studies to all
eternity." A public funeral was awarded him, and a place of
sepulchre in Westminster Abbey; but at the Restoration his
body, along with the bodies of several others, was dug up and
cast into a pit in St. Margaret's Churchyard.
THE REV. JOHN WHITE.
John White was born at Staunton, near Woodstock, Oxford-
shire, about Christmas, 1574. His father being a tenant of
New College, and connected by descent with Hampshire, his
son was sent first to Winchester School, and then from it to
New College, Oxford. He rose to be a fellow in the college,
and took his degree in Arts about 1597. About 1606 he
was appointed rector of Trinity Church, Dorchester, where he
laboured for many years with great fidelity and success. He
became known as the patriarch of Dorchester, and had more
authority with many than the bishop of the diocese ; yea,
according to Fuller, had " much influence both in Old and New
England," having taken a very active part in the establishment
of the colony of Massachusetts. In the course of his ministry
he is said to have lectured once through the whole of the
Scriptures and half way through them a second time. In the
civil war he took the side of the Parliament, and when the
dashing Prince Rupert came into those parts his Cavaliers were
xlviii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
allowed to plunder the rectory and carry off the rector's library.
White thereupon removed to London, where he was made
Master of the Savoy, and appointed a member of the West-
minster Assembly and one of the assessors to its prolocutor.
After Dr. Featley's expulsion from the Assembly, White was
appointed to occupy his sequestrated rectory of Lambeth, and
to enjoy the use of his library till his own should be restored.
He was offered, but declined, the Mastership of New College,
Oxford, and after the civil war was over he seems to have
left the Assembly and returned to spend his last days at his
beloved Dorchester. He was one of those who officiated at
St. Margaret's, Westminster, on the memorable occasion when
the Solemn League and Covenant was taken by the House of
Commons, but he does not seem to have taken any very active
part in the business of the Assembly. He was married to the
sister of Dr. Burgess, his co-assessor, and he is said to have
been the maternal great-grandfather of the Wesleys. His cate-
chism, entitled A Plaine (ind Familiar Exposition upon the Creed,
X. Ckrnimanthnenfs, Lord's Prayer, and Sacraments, etc., passed
through several editions, and, save in the introduction, is
identical with that of Josias White, his elder brother, though
probably this last was the copyist. Antony Wood says of him,
" He was a person of great gravity and presence, and one of the
most learned and moderate in the Assembly." Fuller says,
" He was grave without moroseness, and would contribute his
shot of facetiousness on any just occasion. By his wisdom the
town of Dorchester was much enriched, knowledge causing
piety, piety industry, and industry procuring plenty unto it."
THE KEY. HENRY WILKINSON, B.D.
Henry Wilkinson, senior, w^as born in the vicarage at Halifax
in 1566, and was probably therefore the oldest member of the
Westminster Assembly. He entered Merton College, Oxford,
of which his relative. Sir Henry Savile, was head, in 1581, and
in due course took his degree in Arts, and was appointed to a
fellowship. In 1597 he proceeded to the degree of B.D. In
1601 he became minister of Waddesdon, in Buckinghamshire,
where he laboured with great zeal and fidelity for nearly
REV. HENRY WILKINSON. xllX
forty-six years. He was brought into trouble in 1640 on
account of a sermon he preached before the University, and
was suspended from his office ; but he was released from this
suspension by the Long Parliament, and soon after he was
nominated by them as one of the members of the Assembly of
Divines. As already mentioned, he was probably the oldest
member, and he seems to have been by that time in failing-
health, as at least three several times it is recorded in the
minutes that one of the brethren had been sent to visit him.
Like White, he seems to have returned to his parish in the
country in 1646-7, and he died at AVaddesdon on 19th March
1647-8, and was interred in the chancel of his own church,
leaving, according to the inscription on his tombstone, an
" example of a most upright and holy life, and a reputation
scarcely to be exceeded." He was the author of several dis-
courses, and of a catechism which passed at least through four
editions ; the following is its title : — " A Cateclmme, contaynmg
a short exposition of the j^ohits in the ordinary Cateclmme, uith
jjroofes of the same out of Scriioture, set forth for the use of
such as desire to he catechised in the congregation of JFadsdon, in
Buckinghamshire, or elsewhere, by Henry Wilkinson, Bachelor in
Divinity." It treats first of the Ten Commandments, after that
of the Apostles' Creed, and the Sacraments, and then of the
Lord's Prayer. It says of God, " He is one Jehovah, infinite
in power, wisdom, holiness, mercy, justice, goodness, eternity,"
etc. A long prayer is appended to the catechism, which con-
cludes as follows : — "Let thy Sabbaths be our delight, let thy
2)romises be our stay and comfort in these conflicting daies of
sin. Lord, sanctifie us throughout, accomplisli the good worke
which thou hast begun in us, seale us up to the day of redemp-
tion, prepare us for thine everlasting kingdom : set thy hedge
about us and al that we have, let not Sathan breake in upon
us, let not us breake out from thee. Finally, let us so live in
thy feare, that we may dye in thy favour ; and, being faithfull
unto death, we may receive the crowne of life by the merits
and obedience of our Redeemer Jesus Christ ; in whose name
we further call upon thee as he himself hath taught us. Our
Father v:]iich art in Heaven,'' etc.
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
THE EEV. WILLIAM GOUGE, D.D.
AViLLiAM Gouge was born at Stratforcl-le-Bow, Middlesex,
in 1575, and was educated partly at St. Paul's School, London,
and partly at Eton College. He entered King's College,
Cambridge, in L595, where he studied with great diligence, and
in due course became M.A., and was elected fellow of his college.
He became B.D. in 1611, and D.D. in 1628. During the nine
years he was in the college it is said that he never, when
resident, was absent from morning prayers, and that he was
wont to read fifteen chapters of the Scriptures daily, at three
separates time, namely, morning, noon, and evening. He
studied Hebrew under a Jewish rabbi, and taught it as well as
logic and philosophy. Li 1607 he was ordained, and in the
following year was appointed to the church of St. Ann's, Black-
friars, London, which he held for nearly forty-six years, saying
that he wished to go from Blackfriars to heaven. Besides other
perferment, which he was oftered but declined, was the Master-
ship of King's College, Cambridge. In 1621 he was imprisoned
for nine weeks for republishing Finch's Calling of the Jews. In
early life he drew up a catechism, which, after being privately
circulated and surreptitiously published, was revised and given to
the public by himself It is entitled A Short Catechisme, wherein
are hriejiij handled the Fundarrientall Principles of Christian Religion
needfull to be learned of all Christians before they come to the Lord's
Table, and comprises a large and a short or abridged catechism,
with prayers appended. It had reached the eighth edition by
J. 636. The Short Catechism only is reprinted in the following
volume, along with the prayer in which its teaching is
summed up, and in which is found in rudimentary form that
definition of God which tradition attributes to the oldest or
the youngest member of the Westminster Assembly. His
definition of God as " a Spirit of infinite perfection " comes
very near to that at first favoured by the Assembly (Note 3,
p. xx), and by Palmer (Note 1, p. xxi).
Besides various volumes of sermons, which from time to
time he gave to the public, he prepared for the press an
exhaustive commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. This
REV. HERBERT PALMER. li
comprised the substance of a thousand lectures delivered in his
church, and was published by his son in 1655, in two vols.,
folio. He was appointed a member of the Westminster
Assembly in 1643, and was a member of several important
committees, especially of those intrusted Avith the preparation
of the Confession of Faith and Catechisms. He occasionally
took part in the debates of the Assembly, and in 1647 was
chosen assessor in succession to Mr. Palmer. The same year
he was appointed Prolocutor of the first Provincial Assembly
of London. He died, in December 1653, in his seventy-ninth
year. He was exemplary in the discharge of all ministerial
duties, and was greatly respected and beloved. Wood says, "He
was esteemed the father of the London Puritan ministers, a
pious and learned preacher, and is often honourably mentioned
by Voetius, Streso, and other foreign divines." Fuller enrols him
among the worthies of King's College, and Granger affirms that
he was so much beloved that none ever thought or spoke ill of
him excepting those who were inclined to think or speak ill of
religion itself. Archbishop Ussher is said occasionally to have
attended on his ministry in the later years of his residence in
London.
THE REV. HERBERT PALMER, B.D.,
Herbert Palmer, younger son of Sir Thomas Palmer, was
born at Wingham, Kent, on 29tli March 1601,. and was early
brought to the knowledge of the truth by a pious mother. He
entered St. John's College, Cambridge, in 1615, became M.A.
in 1622, and was chosen fellow and tutor of Queens' College
in 1623. In the following year he was ordained, and in
1626 he was admitted as a minister or lecturer in St. Alphege
Church, Canterbury. There he enjoyed the friendship of
Delme, the pastor of the French church, who, like himself,
was afterwards to be a member of the Westminster Assembly.
Being able to speak French fluently, he once or twice offici-
ated for his friend. He is said to have been an " earnest,
moving, and faithful preacher." About 1632 he was pre-
sented by Archbishop Laud to the vicarage of Ashwell, in
Herts. In 1643 he was named as one of the members of
the Westminster Assembly, and soon after was admitted minis-
lii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
ter, first of Duke's Place Church, Loudon, and then of New
Church, Westminster, and he was also appointed one of the
morning lecturers in Westminster Abbey. He was small of
stature and somewhat deformed. He was a ready and effective
speaker, and took an active part in the proceedings of the
Assembly and its committees. He belonged to the more
moderate Presbyterian party, and it greatly grieved the heart of
Baillie that in the debates on the divine right of ruling elders,
even "learned, gracious, little Palmer" was unconvinced by the
Scottish arguments. He was a member of the Committee on
Accommodation, and is said to have drafted the papers on
ordination in reply to the Independents, which were finally
published in 1648. But his most important work in the
Assembly, as already stated in the preceding Introduction, was
in connection with the Committee on the Catechisms, over the
deliberations of which he presided from the time of its first
appointment till his death. Early in 1G47 he was appointed
assessor to the Prolocutor in room of AVhite of Dorchester.
In 1644 he was appointed Master of Queens' College, Cam-
bridge, with the approval of the Assembly, but he seems still to
have remained chiefly in London, and the few entries regarding
him in the books of Queens' College merely record the fact
that leave of absence v/as granted him that he might attend
upon the business of the Assembly, and that John Wallis, the
famous matliematician, was taken into the number of fellows on
]iis recommendation. He died about the end of August 1647,
after a brief illness. Granger says he was a man of uncommon
learning, generosity, and politeness ; Reid adds, " his conversa-
tion was holy and heavenly; he lived piously and died cheerfully."
An interesting biography of him is preserved in manuscript in
the British Museum, the most essential parts of which have been
given to the public by Dr. Grosart, in the treatise in which he
vindicates for him the authorship of the Christian Paradoxes,
long attributed to Lord Bacon. Besides these and the
catechism, of which the first part is reprinted in this volume,
Palmer was the author of a work entitled Memorials of Godliness
and Chrislianily, which passed througli a number of editions.
He was joint author with Dr. Cawdrey of an important work
on the Sabbath (juestion, bearing the title Vindicice Sahbathi.
REV. DANIEL CAWDREY. Hii
Several of liis sermons, preached before tlie Houses of Parlia-
ment, were also published, and among them one which brought
on him the wrath of Milton by its denunciation of the poet's
views on divorce and the liberty of unlicensed printing. His
catechism, like so many others, was at first published anony-
mously, and it appears to have been printed at Cambridge, at
the University Press, in 1640. Each of the principal cpiestions
and answers was first given in full, and then was broken down into
a number of subordinate questions, each of which required as
answer only Yes or jYo. The Assembly thought such a method
might be profitably used by the catechiser in catechising, but
would not be persuaded formally to set down the subordinate
questions in the printed catechism. Still the first part of hi&
treatise may be regarded as the basis of their first and uncom-
pleted draft of a catechism as recorded in the Minutes of the
AssemUy, p. 281, etc. But even in that draft, and still more
decidedly in the later ones, the more important doctrinal defini-
tions are based much more on Ussher's and Ball's catechisms
than on Palmer's.
THE EEY. DANIEL CAWDRE^'.
Daniel Cawdrey was born about 1588-89, and was the son
of an old Nonconformist minister. He was educated at the
College of Peterhouse, Cambridge, and took his degree in Arts
before leaving the University. Some time before 1624 he had
been appointed minister of Little Ilford in Essex, and soon
afterwards he was transferred to the parish of Great Billing, in
Northamptonshire. This he continued to hold till he was
ejected in 1662, and he appears about 1648 to have been also
minister of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, London. He died in
October 1664, at Wellingborough. He was the author of
several sermons preached on public occasions, and of treatises
entitled Svperstitio Superstes, Vindicice Claviwn, Inconsistency of
Independency with Scripture and luith itself; and, as previously
mentioned, he was joint author with Palmer of an important
work on the Sabbath question. He was a member of the
Assembly of Divines, who gave pretty regular attendance on its
sittings, and took an active part in its debates and proceedings.
liv BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
He was a member of the Committee on the Catechism, and had
himself published a small catechism, as well as revised and
edited a larger one drawn up liy his father.
THE REV. THOMAS GATAKER, B.D.
Thomas Gataker was born in London in 1574. He was
the son of the Rev. Thomas Gataker, of the family of Gatacre
Hall, in Shropshire, in Avhich the name had been continued
from the days of Edward the Confessor. He entered St. John's
College, Cambridge, in 1590, pursued his studies there with
great ardour and success, and made special attainments both in
Greek and Hebrew. He took his degrees in due course, and
was elected Fellow of Sidney Sussex College in 1596. While
there he was specially intimate with William Bedell, afterwards
Bishop of Kilmore, and with him and some others " engaged in
the pious and laudable work of preaching every Lord's Day in
.some of the surrounding villages." With Bedell, as well as
with Ussher, he maintained correspondence in later life. On
leaving the University he became chaplain to Sir William Cook,
in London, and in IGOl he was appointed preacher to the
Honourable Society of Lincoln's Inn. This office he held for ten
years, and, against the remonstrances of his friends, gave it up,
when appointed to Rotherhithe or Redriff, in Surrey, near
London Bridge. He discharged his duties in this important
parish with the greatest diligence and acceptance. He held a
lecture weekly on Fridays, as well as preached on the Lord's
Day. In 1603 he was promoted to the degree of B.D., but
afterwards, for economical reasons, he refused to proceed to the
degree of D.D. In 1620 he made the tour of Holland and
Belgium. " As the modesty of his nature withheld him from
printing anything till he was forty-five years of age, so by that
time his judgment was so confirmed, and his learning supported
by an almost incredible memory, that he constantly carried his
point, and effectually baffled all the attempts to envelop again in
darkness and obscurity any subject that he had once proposed to
enlighten." One of his earliest treatises was of the Nature and
Use of Lots, which was highly esteemed and passed through
several editions. In 1643 he was chosen a member of the
REV. THOMAS GATAKER. Iv
Assembly ot Divines, and at first he appears to have given
pretty regular attendance on their discussions. He took a pro-
minent part in the debates on Justification against Featley and
others of the more narrowly orthodox school, and when a
decided majority voted for their opinion, " his peaceable and
pious spirit caused him to keep silence, and to refrain from pub-
lishing the treatise he had prepared on that subject grounded
on Eomans iii. 28." Baillie tells us he was flatly opposed to
the Divine institution of the office of ruling elders. In 1644 he
was offered the Mastership of Trinity College, Cambridge.
But he declined that preferment, being content with his own
pastoral charge, and more ambitious of doing good to others
than of exalting himself. Hallam says that, after Archbishop
Ussher, Gataker was the most learned divine then in England.
He would have been satisfied with a moderate Episcopacy, but
holding that bishops and presbyters, according to the New
Testament, ^YQYe the same, he ultimately submitted to Presby-
tery. He wrote various learned treatises against the Anti-
nomians, for wdiich he received the thanks of the Assembty.
His book, De Stylo Novi Testamenti, was one of the first to main-
tain the view now universally accepted, that the New Testament
is not written in classic Greek, but abounds in Hebraisms and
Hellenisms. His edition of Marcus Antoninus was acknowledged
to be one of the best, as it was one of the first, attempts to edit
in a worthy form the works of the Stoic Emperor. A volume
of his sermons was published in England, and a volume of his
more learned works in Latin in Holland. His catechism, said
to have been published in 1624, is very brief and simple, and
does not seem to have been made use of in the composition of
the Westminster Catechisms. His friend Simeon Ashe says, in
his funeral sermon on Gataker — "To his care of feeding his
flock in public very agreeable was his diligence to instruct his
family in private. For on Friday night weekly he did expound
after supper that Short Catechisme which he had published for
the use of his parishioners, in which course he so laid forth the
nature and attributes of God, the conditions of man entire and
corrupt, the means of his fall and recovery, the nature of faith
and repentance, with the doctrine of the sacraments, that his
parlour was one of the best schools for a student of divinity."
Ivi BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
THE EEV. ANTONY TUCKNEY, D.D.
Antony Tuckney was born in 159D, at Kirkton, in
Lincolnshire, where his father was vicar. In 1613 he
entered Emmanuel College, Cambridge, became B.A. 1617,
M.A. in 1620, B.D. in 1627, and D.D. in 1649. He was
for several years previous to 1627, fellow and tutor of his
college, and under his watchful care many were trained up
who afterwards did great service in Church and State, and
retained a grateful remembrance of their obligations to him.
About 1628 he is said to have composed a catechism to
l)e used in Emmanuel College Chapel. Soon after he. left
the University, and became assistant to Mr. John Cotton at
Boston. On the removal of Cotton to New England, in
1633, he was appointed to succeed him in the ministry, and
continued faithfully to labour there till the civil war broke
out. At the commencement of the Long Parliament he and
Palmer were appointed to represent the clergy of Lincoln in
Convocation; and in 1643, he, like Palmer, was nominated a
member of the Assembly of Divines. In that year he removed
with his family to London, and resided mostly there till 1648,
when he took up his abode at Cambridge. While resident in
London he acted as minister of the sequestrated charge of St.
Michael's Quern. In 1645 he was made Master of Emmanuel
College, Cambridge, and in 1653 he was transferred to the
Mastership of St. John's, on the promotion of his friend Dr.
Arrowsmith to that of Trinity. Shortly afterwards he
succeeded to the Regius Professorship of Divinity, which Arrow-
smith resigned. Tuckney took an active part iu the business of
the Assembly, and was a member of the Committees on Accom-
modation " with the Independents," on the Confession of Faith,
and on the Catechism. In the last of these, probably during the
temporary absence of Palmer, he seems to have had chief charge
for a time — first, while the exposition of the Ten Commandments
was being digested into the shape in which we have it in the
Larger Catechism, and again, during Palmer's last illness and
after his death, when the Shorter Catechism was being finally
revised. It is said by Brook and others that many of the
answers in the Larger Catechism, and particularly in the part of
REV. ANTONY TUCKNEY, D.D. Ivii
it specified above, were prepared by him, and " were continued
for the most part in the very words which he brought in." This,
however, must, at any rate, be taken with the qualification that
he availed himself largely of the materials already provided to
his hand in the treatises of Cartwright, Perkins, Ussher, etc.,
and only endeavoured to improve on these. He continued in
his offices at Cambridge till the restoration of Charles ll., " when
a set of young men were so intoxicated with the return of the
king, and flushed with warmer expectations as to forget the
reverence and gratitude which was due to a venerable old man,
and to turn upon the benefactor to whom most of them owed
encouragement " in their studies, and several of them prefer-
ment. He was prevailed on, by the king and the Earl of Man-
chester, to resign his offices, and a pension of £100 a year out
of their emoluments was promised to him. This was regularly
paid by Dr. Gunning, who succeeded him both in his professor-
ship and in the Mastership of St. John's. Tuckney died in
1669-70, "in a good old age and in good esteem," and was
buried in St. Andre w's-under- Shaft, London. A volume of his
sermons was published after his death ; also his lectures and
theses in Latin, and other treatises. AVhichcote held him and
Arrowsmith in very high esteem, and the historian of St. John's
College says of them that their government was so good, and the
discipline under them so strict and regular, that learning then
flourished, and several of those great men were then trained who
were to be ornaments of the following age, as Stillingfleet,
Beveridge, Cave, etc. Whichcote says of him, " I have had you
all along in very high esteem, and have borne you reverence
beyond what you do or can imagine, having in me a living and
quick sense of my first relation to you ; and of all men alive I
have least aff"ected to differ from you or to call in question either
what you have done, or said, or thought, but your judgment I
have regarded with reverence and respect. I do not, I cannot,
forget my first four years' education in the University under you,
and I think I have principles by me I then received from you."
THE EEV. JOHN ARKOWSMITH, D.D.
John Arrowsmith was born at Gateshead, near Newcastle-
on-Tyne, on 29th March 1602 — i.e. the same year and day as Dr.
e
Ivill BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
John Lightfoot. He was educated at St. John's College; became
B.A. in 1619, B.D. in 1633, D.D. in 1647. He studied theology
under the then Regius Professor — the celebrated Davenant — to
whom in later life he acknowledged his great obligations, and
whose moderate Calvinism he carefully followed. He was for
some time fellow of Catherine Hall, and for several years after-
wards he was minister of King's-Lynn, Norfolk. On being
appointed a member of the Westminster Assembly he removed
to London, where he obtained the sequestration of St. Martin's,
Ironmonger Lane. He was highly esteemed by the divines of
the Assembly, he took part in their debates on various occasions,
and was a member of the Committees on the Confession of Faith
and on the Catechisms. In 1 644 he was, with the approval of the
Assembly, appointed Master of St. John's College, Cambridge,
and in 1651 Regius Professor of Divinity, and in 1653 was
transferred from St. John's to Trinity. He died in 1689.
Besides several sermons, two works of his are in print, viz.,
his TacHca Sacra and his Armilla Sacra or Chain of Principles,
both of which are highly esteemed, as he himself was for his
learning, piety, and moderation in these troublous times. Baillie
speaks of him as " ane learned divyne, on whom the Assembly
putt the wryting against the Antinomians." Dr. Whichcote.
who speaks so highly of Tuckney, says of Arrowsmith — " A later
acquaintance indeed, but my friend of choice, as a companion of
my special delight ; whom in my former years I have acquainted
with all my heart, I have told him all my thoughts, and I have
scarcely either spoken or thought better of a man in respect of
the sweetness of his spirit and amiableness of his conversation."
THE REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD.
Samuel Rutherfurd was born at Nisbet, now in the parish
of Crailing, in Teviotdale, about the year 1 600, and entered Edin-
burgh University in 1617, where, four years later, he obtained
his degree of M.A. Soon after he was chosen Regent of
Humanity, but, on being charged with some irregularity, he
demitted his office in 1625. Through the influence of Gordon
of Kenmure, he was settled as pastor of Anwoth, on the Solway
Firth, in 1627, without compl3ang with Prelacy, or "giving any
REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Hx
engagement to the Bishop." There, according to M'Ward, his
amanuensis, " he laboured night and day with great success, the
whole country coming to him, and accounting themselves as his
particular flock." Early in 1636, his first work, entitled
Exerdtationes Ajjologeticce jwo Divlna Gratia, emanated from the
Amsterdam press. For this book, in defence of the doctrine of
Grace against Arminianism, he had to stand a three days' trial
before the High Commission. Having declined their jurisdic-
tion, and refused to give the prelates their titles, he was
deposed from his charge, prohibited to exercise his ministry
within Scotland, and enjoined to ward himself in Aberdeen
during the king's pleasure. In that stronghold of Episcopacy
and Absolutism he remained " six quarters of ane yeir " —
spending his time in theological studies, and in writing many of
those letters which have made him so famous. Thus, his
enforced retirement became profitable to others as well as
enjoyable to himself. His own words are — "I know, and am
persuaded, it is for God's truth, and the honour of my King and
royal Prince, Jesus, I now suffer ; and howbeit this town is my
prison, yet Christ hath made it my palace, a garden of pleasures,
a field and orchard of delight." " But," he exclaims, " my silence
on the Lord's Day keeps me from being exalted above measure."
" Nothing out of heaven, next to Christ, is dearer to me than
my ministry," and " woe is me if I preach not the Gospel."
He returned to Anwoth in the summer of 1638, soon after
the National Covenant was renewed, and was a member of the
famous Assembly held towards the close of that year in Glasgow.
The city of Edinburgh applied to the Commission of Assembly
to have him for one of their ministers, and at the same time
St. Andrews University asked him as Professor of Divinity.
Though more anxious far to remain in his obscure charge, with
its scanty stipend, he was constrained, by the Assembly of 1639
confirming the proceedings of the Commission, to go to St.
Andrews. But, at his urgent request, he was appointed to
exercise his ministry in the city as well as to teach in the
University, and he was inducted as a minister a few weeks
after Mr. Eobert Blair.
In his new sphere his hands were filled with work, but he
lengthened his days by rising at three o'clock in the morning.
Ix BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
According to his faithful amanuensis, " God did so singularly
second His servant's indefatigable pains, both in teaching in the
schools, and preaching in the congregation, that it became forth-
with a Lebanon, out of which were taken cedars for building
the house of the Lord through the whole land. ... He seemed
to pray constantly, to preach constantly, to catechise constantly,
to be still [i.e. continually] in visiting the sick, in exhorting
from house to house, to teach as much in the schools, and spend
as much time with the young men, as if he had been sequestered
from all the world besides ; and withal to write as much as if
he had been constantly shut up in his closet."
Having been appointed one of the Scottish Commissioners to
the Westminster Assembly, he took his seat among the divines
on the 20th of November 1643, to "have a hand in laying the
foundations for many generations, and building the waste places
of Zion." " Had not God sent Mr. Henderson, Mr. Rutherfoord,
and Mr. Gillespie among them," says Baillie, " I see not that
ever they could have agreed to any settled government."
Rutherfurd took a prominent part in the debates, and did
good service also with his pen. While in London he published
several of his controversial works, and preached before both
Houses of Parliament. The Confession of Faith, the Directory
for Worship, the Form of Church Government, and Larger
Catechism having been drawn up, the General Assembly, on the
24th of August 1647, allowed him to return; but he did not
take his leave of the Westminster Assembly until the 9th of
November, when the Shorter Catechism had passed the first
reading. On his return to St. Andrews he was made Principal
of St. Mary's College, and twice or thrice held the office
of Rector of the University. At this time there was preach-
ing in the parish four times every week; and from 1649
till Rutherfurd's death, he and James Wood seem to have
preached in the churches and presided in the Session as often
as Blair and Honeyman, who, more strictly speaking, were
the ministers of the parish. In 1642 he procured an act of
transportability, and unsuccessful attempts were made to trans-
late him to Edinburgh University, and to the parish of Calder.
And so highly was he regarded in Holland that he was offered
the Chair of Divinity and Hebrew in the University of Harder-
REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Ixi
wyck, and subsequently was elected successor to Dematius in
the University of Utrecht, in 1651 ; but he thought too highly
of the Church of Scotland to desert her in such troublous times.
The last ten years of his life were perhaps the most trying. The
Church he loved was rent by the unhappy controversy between
the Eesolutioners and Protesters. Many of his old friends took
the former side, while he felt it his duty to cleave to the latter.
In 1660, Charles the Second was restored to the throne, and
Presbytery, weakened by internal dissensions and betrayed by
Sharp, was soon overthrown. Rutherfurd's Lex Rex, the prin-
ciples of which are now acknowledged to underlie the British
constitution, was burned at Edinburgh, London, and St.
Andrews. Deprived of his chair in the University, and of his
charge in the Church, he was confined to his house, and his
stipend confiscated. Though evidently dying, he was cited to
appear before Parliament on a charge of high treason. " But,"
Wodrow says, " he had a higher tribunal to appear before,
where His Judge was his friend." In his illness he spoke much
of the new name and the white stone given to God's children,
and longed for a well-tuned harp to show forth Immanuel's
praise. To four of his co-presbyters who came to see him, he
said, " Dear brethren, do all for Him. Pray for Christ. Preach
for Christ. Do all for Christ. Beware of men-pleasing." On
the afternoon of the 28th of March 1661, he said, "This night
will close the door, and fasten my anchor within the veil, and I
shall go away in a sleep by five o'clock in the morning." The
Celestial City seemed to dawn on his sight, as he rapturously
exclaimed : " Glory, glory dwelleth in Immanuel's Land ! " In
the words of Howie of Lochgoin, " By five o'clock in the morn-
ing, as he himself foretold, it was said unto him, ' Come up
hither ; ' . . . and the renowned eagle took its flight unto the
mountains of spices."
Rutherfurd, who was twice married, was survivedby a widow
and one daughter. No stone seems to have marked his resting-
place in St. Andrews burying-ground, until 1735, when the Came-
ronians laid a flat stone with a quaint inscription over his grave.
About 1850 the inscription was renewed, and the stone repaired.
It now stands on end, side by side with that which was then
erected to the memory of Thomas Halyburton. In 1842, a
Ixii BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
monument sixty feet high was raised to his memory on the top
of Boreland Hill, in the parish of Anwoth. But he has left a
monument, more enduring than either, in his Letten, which
were written, not for publication, but out of the fulness of his
heart, to his intimate friends. They have been translated into
Dutch and German, and, having gone through more than thirty
editions, are known everywhere, and, better still, are highly
prized by very many exercised souls.
Lit. — Life, by Murray : Edin., 12mo, 1828 ; and by Dr. Andrew
Thomson, in 1884. His works are: — Exercitationes Apolor/eticce
pro Divina Gratia: Amsterdam, 8vo, 1636; Franeker, 1651.
A Peaceable and Temjyerate Plea for PaiiVs Presbyter ie in Scotland:
Lond., 4to, 1642. Sermon before the lionise of Commons :'Lond.^
4to, 1644. The Due Right of Presbyteries :'Lond.,\4:io, 1644. Lex
Rex; The Law and the Prince: Lond., 4to, 1644, 1657. Sermon
before the House of Lords: Lond., 4to, 1645. The Tryal and
Triumph of Faith: Lond., 1645, both in 4to and a smaller size;
Lond., 1652; Edin., 1721 ; Glasg., 1743, 1827; and Edin., 1845.
The Divine Right of Church-government and Excommunication ; to
which is added A brief tractate of Scandcd : Lond., 4to, 1646.
Christ dying and drawing Sinners to Himself e : Lond., 4to, 1647 ;
Edin., 1727 ; Glasg., 8vo, 1803. A Survey of the Spiritual Anti-
christ^ in two parts : Lond., 4to, 1648. A Free Disputation against
pretended Liberty of Conscience: Lond., 4to, 1649, 1651. The
Last and Heavenly Speeches and Glorious Departure of John, Vis-
count JCenmuir: Edin., 4to, 1649; 12mo, 1703; 18mo, 1827.
Disputatio Scholastica de Divina Providentia : Edin., 4to, 1650.
Editions are also said to have been published in 1649 and 1651.
The Covenant of Life Opened: Edin., 4to, 1655. A Survey of the
Survey of that Summe of Church Discipline 2)en7ied by Mr. Thomas
Hooher : Lond., 4to, 1658. Lnfl^iences of the Life of Grace : J^owd.. ,
4to, 1659. Joshua Redivivus, or 3Ir. Rutherford^ s Letters, was
first printed in 1664 ; Bonar's edition, Mdtli an appreciative sketch
of his life, is by far the best : Edin., 8vo, 1863 ; 2 vols. Examen
i4 rm«l^Vm^"s??i^.•■ Utrecht, 12mo, 1668. The Power and Prevcdency
of Faith and Prayer : 1713. A Testimony to the work of Re for-
REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. Ixiii
mation, which he emitted a month before his death, was printed in
1739 and 1784. A Collection of Vahcable Sermons, said to be
from the notes of hearers, was printed in Glasgow in 1802, and,
with additions, as Communion Sermons in 1876. A volume of
Quaint Se7i7ions was published in 1885. Ane Catechisme conteining
the soume of Christian Religion, by Eutherfurd, is published for
the first time in this Collection. ^
Eutherfurd was the " saint of the Covenant," ever striving to
quicken in others the same enrapturing views as those which
possessed his own soul, of Him whom he deemed " chief among
ten thousand thousands." But, as Mr. Taylor Innes has re-
marked in his able and appreciative sketch of him, " It looks
sometimes as if there were two men in him. One was the man
whom all know in his letters — ardent, aspiring, and unw^orldly
. . . rapt into the continual contemplation of one unseen Face ;
finding his history in its changing aspect and his happiness in
its returning smile. The other man was the intellectual gladia-
tor, the rejoicing and remorseless logician, the divider of words,
the distinguisher of thoughts, the hater of doubt and ambiguity,
the scorner of compromise and concession, the incessant and
determined disputant, the passionate admirer of sequence and
system and order, in small things as in great, — in the corner of
the corner of an argument, as in the mighty world outside with
its orbits of the Church and of the State." '' The two men —
the two halves of the man — were never made into one effective
whole. To the very last the scholasticism and the devotion,
however closely intermixed, are never fused together ; in Bacon's
phrase, they are iron and clay — ' they cleave, but they do not
incorporate. ' " Hence, perhaps, the unhappy quarrels of his earlier
and later life in St. Andrews, not only with Sharp and Honey-
man, who ultimately abandoned Presbyterianism, but also with
Howie, who returned to his earlier convictions in 1637, and
whom Henderson saved from his harsh treatment, as with Blair
and Wood, w^ho were for years his colleagues, and proved as
faithful to Presbytery in 1660 as himself. If we must credit
him with having penetrated into Sharp's true character sooner
^ For the preceding part of this account of Eutherfurd, I am indebted
to my esteemed friend, D. Hay Fleming, Esq., St. Andrews.
Ixiv BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
than his colleagues, we have yet to admit that Eaitt, of Brechin,
whom he would have taken into the College in place of Sharp,
was only less unworthy of confidence, as he too changed with
the times, and was made Principal of King's College, Aber-
deen. His life in connection with the eventful times in which
he lived has never yet been written with a full knowledge and
investigation of sources still accessible, particularly the manu-
script sources in the University, Kirk-Session, and Presbytery
records of St. Andrews, though more than one interesting
biography of him has recently been published. From the time
of his settlement in Anwoth, Rutherfurd is said to have given
special attention to catechising, both in his household and in his
parish. The tradition as to Archbishop Ussher having visited
him in disguise, and submitted to be catechised among the
members of his household on the Saturday evening, if well
founded, must be assigned to this period of his ministry. It
may be that the first outlines of the catechism printed in the
second part of this volume, were then drawn up, and that they
may have been revised and expanded after his translation to
St. Andrews in 1639, though it is most likely that they were
not put into final shape till he went as a commissioner to the
Westminster Assembly, and was engaged in suggesting materials
for the catechisms of that Assembly. The account of the treatise
given by one of his latest and most accomplished biographers
is as follows : — " A sketch of a Sliorter Catechism exists in MS.,
in the Library of the Edinburgh University, in Rutherfurd' s
hand'writing , very much resembling the catechism as it now
stands, from which it has been inferred that he had the principal
hand in drawing it up for the Assembly." From the catechism,
as here printed, it will be seen that the resemblance between
Eutherfurd's draft and the Westminster Catechisms, either
Shorter or Larger, is by no means so close as Dr. A. Bonar sup-
posed either in plan or in language, and that, whatever help he
may have given in details, the influence of Palmer, Tuckney, and
Wallis is far more apparent than his. His catechism was meant
to correspond, not to the Shorter, but to the Larger Catechism,
as that of his friend Wyllie, which abridges his, was meant to
correspond to the Shorter. AVyllie for a short time was his
neighbour at Borgue, and seems to have kept up his friendship
REV. SAMUEL RUTHERFURD. IxV
with him in after years. His catechism is a very pithy abridg-
ment and revision of Rutherfurd's. Blair's catechism is a mere
fragment, written on the back of a letter apparently sent him
from England, and I shall not lengthen out these notices by
giving a biographical notice of him, much as I honour him for
his faithful carriage in St. Andrews through these troublous
times. The handwriting of the MS. of these catechisms the late
Mr. David Laing believed to be that of Eutherfurd. The style,
language, and contents of the first catechism, even had the
external evidence been less conclusive, would have gone far to
warrant us in ascribing it to him to whom we owe the Letters,
and many of the quaint Scotch words and metaphors used in the
one are found in the other. Yet evidence is not altogether
wanting that, like the AVestminster divines, he availed himself
of pre-existing materials to some extent. Even the answer to
the question, QiOio abuse the rest of Godis day ? (p. 232), which one
would have been disposed to say was distinctively Ruther-
furdian, is said to be found in approximate form in Bishop
Andrews, and possibly may have come to him from a still older
and quainter author. The particulars as to relative duties under
the fifth commandment also closely resemble those given in
some earlier Catechisms.
In my Baird Lectures (pp. 291, 292) I referred to a terse and brief
st atement of Christian doctrine prepared by the Westminster divines,
an d required by the English Parliament to be known by all who should
be [admitted to partake of the Lord's Sapper. I said that this statement
was well worth the attention of those now-a-days who desire a simpler
one than is contained in the Assembly's Confession or Catechisms, and I
pro mised to reprint it in the Appendix of that volume. Having omitted
to do this, I have inserted at the close of the first part of the present
vol ume one of several catechisms (Austin's) which embody it and also
break it down into the form of question and answer.
APPENDIX A.
I subjoin a few specimens of the manuscript sources still accessible
for illustration of the history of Blair and Kutherfurd.
1. Excerpts from Records of Kirk-Session of St. Andrews.
Tu. 8 Oct. [1639]. Mr. Andrew Auchinleck minister of Gods worde at
Largo preached, being appoynted theranto be the presbyterie Wednes-
day last for receiving of our Minister Mr. Robert Blair this day to the
function of the Ministerie in this kirk and congregation quhilk after
sermone was performit, he sitting at ane table befoir the pulpit accord-
ing to the custome with the Magistrates, and specialls of this citie, the
Maisteris of the colledges and principall gentlemen of the landwart, who
all in signe of their willing acceptation and receiving him to the said
function as representing the whole congregation, took him by the hand
after some positions put furth to him by the said Mr. Andrew, namelie
liis willingness to accept and undergo the said charge, his faithfulnes,
sinceritie and diligence thairin and uther poynts needfuU y^'anent, q^"unto
he willinglie granted, declareing his willing mynd with upholding hands
before God and the congregation present. The whole people lykwyiss
being posed on thair dutie and obedience to his doctrine and discipline
in willing manner with great applause yieldit ymnto with congratulations
for God's mercie in his calling hither, qlk being done, followed the
prayer, thanksgiving, and the blessing.
Tuesday 19 Nov^'. [1639]. . . Heirafter Mr. Samuell Pvutherfurde being
callit heir from the west countrie be the last General Assemblie holden
at Ed'^^ for being ane of the maisteris of the new Colledge to teach
divinitie and lykwyiss coadjutor to the said Mr. Robert Blair in the
function and charge of the Ministerie heir, was receivit heir this day be
the congregation in maner abone written.
Noyi'. 24 [1642]. Mr. Andro Honeyman . . be giiall consent was
admitted ane of the ministers of this city and received to the said func-
tion this day.
May 21 [1646]. No session, our minister Mr. James Wood being
admittit, and the Presbytery being conveened in the session house.
Sepi'. 28 [1654]. No session this day, the ministers being some seeke
and some at the provinciall.
1656 (p. 165). Ministers in this city at this time : Mr. Robert Blair,
Mr. Samuell Rutherfuhxl, Mr. James Wood, and Mr. Andro Honyman.
Octr. 2 [1645], Sonday next the late Directorie for worship in the kirk,
concludit be the Devynes of Ingland, allowit be the Parliament there,
and be our owne and General Assembly in Scotland to be used heirafter
— Intimate and publicly red the whole heids and contents y^'of this day.
[1650]. Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird, Principall of the New College, and
APPENDIX A. Ixvii
ane of the ministers of this cit}', desired that he might have ane com-
modious seat for his wife in the kirk for convenient hearing of the Lord's
word, qlk desire was thought reasonable, etc.
2. Excerpts from Becords of Presbytery.
Sep. 14 [1642]. The qlk day y^' came a letter from Mr. Andro Hony-
man shewing yt he was informed Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird was of purpose
to make use of his act of transportabilitie that he [had] and had been
asking libertie of ye session of St. Andrews so to doe, and yrfor wold be
no meanes keepe y*- day appointed for his admission at St. Andros, and
y'for desired y® delay yrof for a time till ye mater be further cleared qlk
was granted. . . .
October 26. The Presbytery being informed of Mr. Sanuiell Rutherfuird
his purpose to make use of y* act of transportabilitie granted to him by
ye late General Assemblie and yt a presentation to y*^ kirk of Calder is
purchased for him which is to be befor ye Synod of Lothiane to be holden
at Linlithgow on tuesday nixt, The Presbyterie have appointed y^
brother Mr, Andro to repaire thither against y^ tyme and declare to ye
forsaid Synod ye great prejudice ye Kirk of Scotland may receive by his
transportation, and to desire y"^ earnestlie to joyne with us for retaineing
ye said Mr. Samuell in his present charge at St. Andros.
Nov^. 9. Compeired Mr. W"\ Dalgleish minister at Cramont with Mr.
Andro Honyman shewing ye concurrence of ye Provinciall of Lothiane
at our desire for reteining Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird in his present charge
qi'upon both Presbyterie, Universitie, and towne did heartilie thank y™
for y care and diligence, and embraced ye said Mr. Samuell to abyde heir,
c^runto he did aggrie.
May 3 [1643]. All ye members within ye Universitie, INIasters and
Students are appointed to subscryve ye Covenant againe and ]\Ir. Samuel
Rutherfuird Rector is appointed befor ye subscription y^'of to have some
explication of q* points in it may be difficile to those of younger years
and meaner capacities.
Dec^". 28. The Presbyterie received a letter from ye Gomission of ye
Assemblie desiring y™ to send out such ministers to ye armie as yeComittee
of estates and ye Golonell of ye Regiment sail desire and name. As also
they received a letter from ye Gomittee of estates desireing yt for ye good
of ye publick they wold appoint Mr. Robert Blair Minister of St. Andros
to goe out with ye armie and attend the Erie of Lindsay his regiment.
The towne of St. Andros desired ye Presbyterie to take to consideration
ye greatnes of y*- charge, and so how hardlie he can be spared especiallie
Mr. Samuell Rutherfuird one of y'" pastors being alreadie employed
abroad for ye publicke as also ye abounding of witches daylie discovered
among y™, whose tryall will likely be much interrupted if he sail be
removed. The said Mr. Robert himself did likewayes declare yt he lies
frequent habituall infirmities lying upon his bodie, all which and diverse
other reasons being considdered ye Presbj'^terie declarit y*' they could
not at this tyme enjoyne hiui to undergoe y* charge, and a letter to
be writen to ye Lord Ghancellor signifieing so much.
Ixviii
APPENDIX A.
Blair, however, was ultimately constrained to go, and remained for
some months with the Scottish army in the North of England. The
session-book records his return, under date July 18th 1644, immediately
after the victory at Marston Moor, for which the following Lord's day
was appointed as a day of thanksgiving.
Septr. 28th
[1642].
Rutherfuird
Octr. 12th
[1642].
St.Andros and
Rutherfuird.
Octr. 26th
St. xVudros.
Excerpts regarding Butlurfurd^ s Stipend.
It was regrated by diverse brethren y*^ as they were in-
formed all y^ time Mr. Samuell Eutherfurd hes beene
Minister of St. Andrews he hes never received anything
for mainteinance of y^ Landward paroch y^'of. Some of y^
gentlemen qo were present desired y^ mater to be tryed by
ye Presbyterie who is to blame. The Presbyterie did
appoint Mr. David Monro, Mr. Arthur Myrton, Mr. James
Wood, Scottiscraig and Kembok to try y^ mater, and y*^ a
letter be writen from y^ Presbyterie to such as are most
unwilling to meitt with y'" and shew y^ reasons.
Those qo were appointed to meitt with y" heritors and
others of y^ Landward Parochin of St. Andrews, and to deale
with yn^ concerning ye refounding to Mr. Samuell Eutherfurd
of yt part of his stipend which yet rests unpayed according
to condition Declared they did meitt but none of those mett
with y™. They appointed yet to write to y™ to meitt with
y™ at St. Andros on tuesday next for yt effect.
Those appointed to meitt with ye heritors in ye Landward
Paroch of St. Andros declared they had appointed Erlshall
yonger and Lathones, Kinkell and Kynnaldie to use diligence
yi'in!
Because Erlshall resyles in bearing burden or doing any-
thing in yt bussines of repaying ye rest of Mr. Samuell
Eutherfuird's promised mainteinance y* sould be payed by
ye Landward Paroch of St. Andrews, Kinkell and Kynnadie
undertakes to doe yt part also.
Kynnadie being present, and ye Pb"e desiring to know
qt diligence he with ye rest have used in collecting y*- which
' is due to Mr. Samuell Eutherfuird from ye Landward Paroch
of St. Andros, shew y* they were well advanced in laying
1 downe a course for ye same, bot nothing collected except
I 421b. 15s. which Kynnadie hes qrof he desires to be dis-
burdened, which ye Presbyterie appoints ye clerk to receive
I and be comptable for ye same to ye said Mr. Samuell.
June 20th 1649. 1 The Presbyterie does nominate and appoint ye right
Conmiissioners reverend Mr. Eobert Blair and Mr. Samuell Eutherfuird
Asshe. ^"^"^^ i Ministers of St. A7idros, and Mr. Henrie Eymer Minister
! of Carnbie, and ye right honorable The Laird of Scottiscraig
j yr lawfull Commissioners to ye ensewing Generall Assemblie
' to be holden at Ed'" ye first Wedinsday of July next.
Novr. 9th
[1642].
Erlshall
resyle.s.
July 17 [1644],
Rutherfuird.
APPENDIX B.
I can find room for only one specimen of the close connection that
may be traced between the Larger Catechism and the earlier manuals.
I take that afforded by the general rules for the exposition of the com-
mands. I subjoin these in the form and order in which they are first set
down in the Minutes of the Assembly, as bringing out most fully their
correspondences with the rules in earlier manuals, and especially that
attributed to Ussher.
[2] That it is spiritual, and so reacheth the understanding, will, affections,
and all other powers of the soul ; as well as words, Avorks, and gestures.
1. That the law is perfect, and so bindeth every one to full conformity in the
whole man unto the righteousness thereof, and unto sincere entire obedience for
ever ; [so as to require the highe st pitc h of every duty, and to forbid the least
degree of every sin.]
3, That [as] where a duty is commanded the contrary sin is forbidden, and
where a sin is forbidden the contrary duty is commanded : [so where a promise is
annexed, the contrary threatening is included ; and where a threatening is
annexed, the contrary promise is included. [This was ultimately made No. 4,
and the following inserted as 3 : That one and the same thing in divers respects
is commanded or forbidden in several commandments.]
5. That what God forbids is at no time to be done ; what He commands is
always our duty ; but not to be done at all times [and yet every particular duty
not to be done at all times].
6. That under one sin or duty all of the same kind are forbidden or com-
manded, together with all the causes, means, occasions, and appearances thereof,
and provocations thereunto .
7. That what is forbidden or commanded to ourselves, we are bound, accord-
ing to our places, to endeavour that it may be avoided or performed by others.
Ixx
APPENDIX B.
S. Tliat [in] wliat is commanded to otliers, we are bound, according to
onr places, to be helpful to them ; and to take heed of partaking with others in
what is forbidden to them.
Perkins's.
The true interpretation of the Deca-
logue must be according to these rules :
I. In the negative the affirmative
must be understood : and in the affirma-
tive the negative.
II. The negative bindeth at all times
and to all times : and the affirmative
bindeth at all times, but not to all
times : and therefore negatives are of
more force.
Attersoll's Catechism .
Q. How is the laAv to be expox;nded ?
— A. According to the interpretation
of the Scripture, which may be ex-
pressed in these niles : —
1. Where anything is forbidden, the
contrary is commanded ; and where
anything is commanded, the contrary is
forbidden.
2. Where any vice is forbidden, all of
the same kind and nature are forbid-
den, and contrariwise.
III. Under one vice expressly for-
bidden, are comprehended all of that
kind ; yea the least cause, occasion, or
enticement thereto is forbidden. Evil
thoughts are condemned as well as evil
actions.
IV. The smallest sins are entitled
witli the same names that that sin is
which is expressly forbidden in that
commandment to which they appertain,
as . . . hatred is named murder, and
to look after a Avoman with a lusting
eye is adultery.
V. We must understand every com-
mandment of the law, so as that we
annex this condition — unless God com-
mand the contrary. For God being an
absolute Lord, and so above the law,
may command that which His law for-
biddeth : so He commanded Isaac to be
offered, the Egyptians to be spoiled, the
brazen serpent to be erected, which was
a figure of Christ, etc.
3. Tlie Law is spiritual, and reachetli
the heart.
4. All occasions, allurements, and
enticements to sin are forbidden ; and,
where any virtue is commanded, the
means to further it are required.
5. All signs, tokens, and marks are
forbidden, whereby sins may be known
and manifested.
6. We are bound to further the obser-
vation of the commandments in others
as Avell as in ourselves ; otherwise we
do make ourselves partakers of other
men's sins.
APPENDIX B.
Ussher's Body of Divinity.
I. That the haw is spiritual, reaching
to the [imderstauding, will, and affec-
tions afterwards named] soul and all the
powers thereof ; and charging as well
the hearts and thoughts as the outward
Ball's Larger Catechism.
1. That the law is spiritual, binding
the soul and conscience to entire obedi-
ence.
II. That the law is perfect, not only
binding the soul, but also the Avhole
soul, to discharge all the several func-
tions of her faculties perfectly. ... So,
in condemning evil, it condemneth all
evil ; and in commanding good, it com-
mandeth all good, charging man to prac-
tise the good and refuse the evil per-
fectly.
III. That in every commandment
there is a borrowed speech, whereby
more is commanded and forbidden than
is named.
1. Whatsoever the law commandeth,
it forbiddeth the contrary ; and what-
soever it forbiddeth, it commandeth the
contrary. So where any duty is en-
joined, as in the affirmative command-
ments, there we must understand the
contrary sin to be forbidden : and where
any sin is forbidden, as in the negative,
there must we know the contrary duty
is required.
2. Whatsoever the law commandeth
or forbiddeth in one kind, it com-
mandeth or forbiddeth all of the same
kind, and all the degrees thereof, etc.
3. Whatsoever the law commandeth
or forbiddeth, it commandeth or for-
biddeth the causes thereof, and all the
means whereby that thing is done or
brought to pass. So that with the
thing forbidden, or the duty enjoined,
all occasions, or provocations, or fur-
therances thereto, are consequently con-
demned or required.
2, The meaning of the precepts is to
be drawn from the main scope and end
thereof.
[Under No. 5 below is the following :
Q. Is one and the same thing com-
manded in divers precepts? — A. In
divers, yea, in all the commandments
one and the same duty may in diverse
respects be commanded, and the same
sin may be forbidden.]
3. Tiie commandment which forbid-
deth a sin commandeth the contrary
duty ; and the commandment which
requireth a duty forbiddeth the con-
trary sin.
4. Under one vice expressly forbid-
den, all of the same kind, and that
necessarily depend tliereon, as also the
least cause, occasion, or enticement
thereto, are likewise forbidden.
5. Under one duty expressed, all of
the like nature are comprehended, as
all means, effects, and whatsoever is
necessarily required for the perform-
ance of that duty.
6. Where the more honourable person
is expressed, as the man, let the woman
understand that the precept concerneth
her.
7. Where the duty of one man stand-
ing in relation to another is taught,
there is taught the duty of all standing
in the like relation one unto another.
APPENDIX C.
EDITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS
OF THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY.
Extracted {but irlth additions inserted) from Dr Schaff's " Creeds of
Christendom,^'' vol. i. pp. 783, 784.]
The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of j Divmes, | now by
authority of Parliament | sitting at Westminster ; | concerning | a larger
catechism : | presented by them lately to both Houses | of Parliament. |
Printed at London, 4to, Oct. 1647 — 8vo, also 1647. Reprinted at Edin-
burgh, same year, 4to, by Evan Tyler, printer to the King's most excel-
lent Majestic. These editions are all without proofs.
The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of | Divines, | now by
authority of Parliament \ sitting at Westminster, | concerning | A larger
Catechism ; \ presented by them lately to both Houses | of Parliament, j
With the proofs thereof out of the Scriptures. \ 4", London, 1648.
The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of | Divines, | now by
authority of Parliament | sitting at Westminster ; | concerning | a Shorter
Catechism : | presented hy them lately to both Houses | of Parliament. |
Printed at London, 4to, Nov. 1647. 8vo, 1647. Reprinted at Edinburgh,
4"J, same year. These editions are all without proofs.
The Humble | advice | of the | Assembly | of | Divines, | now by
•AwthoYity oi Parliament \ sitting at Westminster, | concerning | A Shorter
Catechism ; | presented by them lately to both Houses | of Parliament. |
Witlt the proofs thereof out of the Scriptures. 4P, London 1648.
Other early London editions bear date 1648, 1650, 1654, 1660, 1680,
1688.
The Shorter Catechism was also repeatedly printed at London under
the following title : — The Grounds and Principles of Religion , contained in
A Shorter Catechism : (according to the advice of the Assembly of Divines
sitting at W^estrainster). To be used throughout the kingdom of England
and Dominion of Wales. There was also published in 12mo, London
1670, an Abridgment of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism, fitted for
the use of the weakest cai)acities and memories.
These Catechisms have been translated into many languages, especially
the Shorter. A Latin version of both appeared, together with the Latin
version of the Confession, at Cambridge in 1656, was reprinted there in
1659, and several times subsequently, at Edinburgh and Glasgow. A
EXPOSITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS. Ixxiii
Greek version of tlie Shorter Catechism, along with the Latin, by John
Harmer, Regins Professor of Greek in Oxford, was published at London
in 1660. A Hebrew version, by William Seaman, M.D., was published at
London in 1689. It was also translated into German, Dntch, and Turkish.
In our own day it has been translated by Dr. Robert Young into Hebrew,
Syriac, Samaritan, Greek, Latin, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian,
German, Dutch, and Gaelic, and into Hebrew and Syriac by Eev. H. S.
M'Kee. The American missionaries at Beyrout have translated it into
Arabic, and the late Rev. William Charteris of Smyrna translated it into
modern Greek. The Catechisms are generally printed in editions of the
Confession of Faith, and the separate editions of them during the past
two centuries in Britain and America are almost innumerable.
EXPOSITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS.
{Also from " Creeds of Christendom,^' loith additions.)
John Wallis, D.D., Professor at Oxford (b. 1616, d. 1703) : A brief and
easie explanation of the Shorter Catechism, presented by the Assembly of
Divines at Westminster to both Houses of Parliament, and by them
approved. Wherein the meanest capacities may in a speedy and easie
way be brought to understand the Principles of Religion. In imitation
of the Catechism, formerly published by Mr. Herbert Palmer, B.D.,
and late Master of Queen's Colledge. London, 1657. 10th edition,
Dublin, 1702.
Joseph Alleine (b.l633, d. 1668) : A most familiar explanation of the
Assemblies Shorter Catechism. London.
Thomas Lye (Minister in London, d. 1684) : An explanation of the
Shorter Catechism. London, 1676.
Hugh Binning (d. 1653, Professor of Moral Philosophy, Glasgow) :
The common 2}rinciples of the Christian religio7i. . . . A practical cate-
chism., 1671.
Thomas Vincent (Minister in London, d. 1671) : An explanation of
the Assemhhfs Sliorter Catechism. London, 1708 ; Edinburgh, 1799 ;
Presbyterian Board of Publication, Philadelphia.
Thomas Watson (Minister in London, d. 1690): A body of iwactical
divinity, consisting of above 176 sermons on the Shorter Catechism. 5th
edition, Glasgow, 1797 ; London, 1807 ; Glasgow, 1838 ; New York, 1836.
John Flavel (b. 1627, d. 1691) : Exposition of the Catechism, 1692.
In his Whole Worlds, 2 vols, fol., 1701, 7th edition, Edinburgh, 1762 ; and
in 6 vols., London, 1820.
Thomas Doolittle (d. 1707): A complete Body of Divinity . London, 1723.
Thomas Ridgley (b. 1667, d. 1734): A Body of Divinity. . . . Being
the substance of Lectures on the Assembly's Lar^ger Catechism. London,
/
Ixxiv EXPOSITIONS OF THE CATECHISMS.
1731-33, 2 vols. fol. ; an edition in 4 vols. 8vo, 1814 ; Edinburgh, 1845,
2 vols. 8vo, New York, 1855.
Samuel Willard (b. 1640, d. 1707) : A Body of Divinity in 250 lectures
on the Assemhli/'s Catechism. 1 vol. fol., Boston, 1726.
Thomas Boston (Minister of Ettrick, b. 1676, d. 1732) : Illustration of
the Doctrines of the Christian Religion upon the plan of the Shorter
Catechism.
John Willison (Minister of Dundee from 1718 to 1750) : A71 example
of plain catechising upon the Assemhhfs Shorter Catechism. Edinburgh,
1737; 2d edition, Glasgow, 1764.
Fisher's Catechism : The Westminster Assemhhfs Shorter Catechism
explained, by way of question and answer. By some Ministers of the
Gosp)el. The authors are Ealph Erskine (d. 1752) ; Ebenezer Erskine
(d. 1754) ; and James Fisher (d. Sept. 28, 1775, Secession Minister at
Greyfriars, Glasgow). Fisher prepared the second part alone, and issued
the third edition, Glasgow, 1753. Hence the whole work is called by
his name. 14th edition, Edinburgh, 1800 ; 17th edition, Glasgow, 1813 ;
also by the Board of Publication, Philadelphia.
James Fisher : The Shorter Catechism in verse.
John Brown (Minister at Haddington from 1751 to 1787) : Easy
exp>Ucation of the Assembly's Shorter Catechism. 8th edition, Edinburgh,
1812 ; 9th edition, Montrose, 1822.
James Gall : Key to the Shorter Catechism. Edinburgh.
Henry Belfrage, (d. 1835) : A pirictlcal exposition of the Assembly's
Shorter Catechism, exhibiting a system of theology in a popular form.
Edinburgh, 2d edition, 1834, 2 vols.
Alex. Mair (d. 1751) : A brief explication of the Assemhhfs Shorter
Catechism. New edition, Montrose, 1837.
Alex. Smith Paterson : A concise system of theology : being the Shorter
Catechism analysed and explained. Edinburgh, 1841 ; 2d edition, 1844.
Eliza Smith : Chapters on the Shorter Catechism. Edinburgh.
Ashbel Green, D.D. (President of Princeton College from 1812 to
1822; d. 1848) : Lectures on the Shorter Catechism. Philadelphia, 1841,
2 vols., Presbyterian Board of Publication.
Jonathan Cross : Illustrations of the Shorter Catechism. Proof-texts,
exposition, and anecdotes. 2 vols. 18mo. Presbyterian Board of Publica-
tion.
Edwin Hall, D.D. : The Shorter Catechism of the Westminster Assembly ^
with Analysis and Scripture proofs. Presbyterian Board of Publication.
James Pt. Boyd, D.D. : The Westminster Shorter Catechism ; with
analysis, proofs, explanations, and illustrative anecdotes. 18mo. Pres-
byterian Board of Publication.
The Bellefonte series of Tracts on the answers to the Shorter Catechism,
written by numerous Presbyterian ministers, and edited by the Eev.
Wm. T. Wylie, Bellefonte, Pa., 1875.
The Shorter Catechism, by Rev. Alex. Whyte, D.D., Free St. George's
Church, Edinburgh' being one of Clark's series of Bible Handbooks.
LIST OF CATECHISMS. IxxV
LIST OF CATECHISMS EXAMINED BY ME IX
YAEIOUS LIBRARIES.
IN LIBRARY OF BRITISH MUSECTM.
A short Catechism, containing the principles of religion, very profitable
for all sorts of people — the Four -and -thirtieth Impression. London^ 1653
(Ball's Smaller Catechism).
A short Treatise containing all the principal grounds of Christian
religion, \evy profitable for all men, especially for all householders, by
way of questions and answers, etc. — the Seventh Impression. London,
1629 (Ball's Larger Catechism). Exposition not broken up into questions.
Same Treatise — Tenth Impression. London, 1635. Exposition still
without subordinate questions.
Same Treatise — Thirteenth Impression. London, 1650. After the
original title follow the words : " Whereunto were added several questions
by the Rev. author's own pen to clear the exposition, as you may
perceive by the epistle to the reader." This epistle, by his friend Ashe,
further informs ns that "the questions which the Rev. author with his
own pen put into the margin of the Book, to clear the exposition for the
benefit of some private friends, are now, upon the request of many, both
ministers and others (who have experienced the profit hereof), published
for more common use. The Catechism as now printed remains the self-
same for si\bstance, without addition or diminution, and there is no more
change in the phrase of words than necessity compelled, that there might
be an harmonious suitableness betwixt the questions and answers." Mr.
Thomas Laugley is mentioned as being one of them " who concurred at
least with the worthy author in the first publishing of this Catechism."
Same Treatise — Fourteenth Impression. London, 1670.
An abridgment and modification of Ball's Shorter Catechism appears
to have been published in 1659, a copy of which is to be found in
E. 1845.
A Briefe Catecheticall Exposition of Christian Doctrine, divided into
foure Catechismes, Comprizing the doctrine of the I, Two Sacraments,
II, Lord's Prayer, III. Ten Commandments, IV. and theCreed. London,
1633. A later edition {A Short Catechisme for the Simpler Sort, by Thos.
Gattaker, B.D. London, 1624. Press-mark, 44/4 bb. 33), has the name
of Dr. Twisse.
An endeavour of making the principles of Christian Religion, viz.,
The Creed, the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the Sacra-
ments, jjlain and easie, etc. etc., printed by Roger Daniel, printer to the
University of Cambridge, 1640.
This is the first edition of Palmer's Catechism, but does not bear the
author's name. The copy in the British Museum purports to have been
gifted by Sir Peter Wentworth to Elizabeth Hancocke.
X
Ixxvi LIST OF CATECHISMS.
The Humble Advice of tlie Assembly of Divines now by authority
of Parliament sitting at Westminster, concerning — I. A Confession of
Faith, II. A Larger Catechism, III. A Shorter Catechism, presented by
them lately to both Houses of Parliament. Printed at London, and re-
printed at Edinbrough, mdcxlviii. E. 417.
The Grounds and Principles of Religion, contained in a Shorter
Catechism (according to the advice of the Assembly of Divines sitting at
Westminster), to be used throughout the Kingdom of England and
Dominion of Wales. London. Printed in the year 1678, ^Apj^ C.
Another edition with same title bears date 1705, another 1707.
A Christian Exercise, containing an easie entrance into the principles
of Religion, and the chiefest points of our Salvation in Christ, with a
direction for all Christians unto the service of God, by W. Home.
London.
The Demands of Holy Scripture, with answeres to the same, etc., made
by T. Becon. London, 1577.
The Catechisme, etc., newly translated out of Latin and Dutch
(Heidelberg Catechism). London, 1578.
A Catechisme and plain instruction for children which prepare them-
selves to communicate in the Holy Supper, yielding therein openly a
reason of their faith according to the order of the French Church at
London. Written in French by Monsieur Fountaine, minister of the
same church there, and lately translated into English by T. W. London,
1579. It has at the end an "Advertisement we are accustomed to give
the Saturday going before the Supper at the prayers, to the end that
every one may prepare himself as he ought to the worthy communicating
and partaking thereof."
The Foundation of Christian Religion, gathered into six Principles.
And it is to be learned of ignorant people that they may be fit to heare
sermons with profit, and receive the Lord's Supper with comfort. Psalm
119. 30. London, 1595. One of the earliest editions of Perkins' Cate-
chism, whose name is signed at end of Preface.
The Good Old Way, or Perkins' improved, in a plain exposition and
sound application of those depths of divinity briefly comprised in his six
principles by that late painfull and faithfull minister of the gospel,
Charles Broxolme in Darbyshire. London, 1653.
A Learned and Excellent Treatise containing all the principal grounds
of Christian Religion, set down by way of conference in a most plain and
familiar manner. Written first in French by Master Mathew Virell, after
translated into Latin, and now turned into English for the use of our
countrymen. The second impression, corrected and amended. London,
1594.
The Principles or the Patterne of Wholesome Words, containing a
collection of such truths as are of necessity to be believed unto salvation,
separated out of the body of all theologie made evident by infallible and
plaine proofes of Scriptures, and withall the several uses such principles
should be put to iire abundantly showed. A project much desired, and
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxvii
of singular use for all sorts of Christians, by N. By field, Preacher of God's
Word at Isleworth in Middlesex. The fifth edition, corrected and
amended. London, 1634. Sixth edition, 1637.
The Summe of the Princii)les, or A Collection of those Principles of
Religion which are set down in the little treatise called the Principles or
Patterne of wholesome words, where they are at large explained, proved,
and applied. London, 1634. This is generally printed with the other.
Its introductory address to the Christian reader is signed Adoniram
Byfidd. The treatise consists of twenty-three sections : 1, of the
Scriptures ; 2, of God ; 3, of Creation ; 4, of Providence ; 5, of Man
in the state of innocency ; 6, of Man in the state of corruption, and of
his fall ; 7, of Sinne ; 8, of the Punishment of Siune ; 9, of Man iu
the state of grace and election ; 10, of Redemption in Christ and of His
person ; 11, of the Human Nature of Christ ; 12, of Christ the Mediator;
13, of the Prophetical Office of Christ ; 14, of His Priestly Office, and of
His obedience to the law; 15, of the Expiation of Sinne; 16, of the
Intercession of Christ; 17, of the Kingly Office of Christ; 18, of the
Church ; 19, of Justification ; 20, of Sanctitication ; 21, of Man in his
Estate of Glory and of his resurrection ; 22, of the Last Judgment ;
23, of the glory of Heaven. In plan it resembles first part of Catechism.
The Plaine Man's Pathway to Heaven, wherein every man may clearly
see whether he shall be saved or damned, set forth dialoguewise for the
better understanding of the simple, by Arth. Dent, Preacher of the Word
of God at South Shooberry, Essex. The eighteenth impression, corrected
and amended, with a table of all the principal matters, and three prayers
necessary to be used in private families. London, 1622.
A Pastime for Parents, or a Recreation to pass away the time, con-
taining the most princij)all grounds of Christian Religion, by Arthur
Dent, Preacher of the word of God at South Shooberry in Essex.
London, 1609.
1. The Principles of Christian Religion summarily set down according
to the Word of God together with a brief epittomie of the bodie of
divinitie, by James Ussher, Bishop of Armagh. London, 1645.
2. A Briefe Methode of Christian Religion with more particular de-
claration of some particular heads of doctrine which for more plainnesse
sake were shortly touched in the former Summe, by James Ussher, Bishop
of Armagh, London, 1646.
A Patterne of Catechisticall Doctrine wherein many profitable ques-
tions touching Christian Religion are handled, and the whole Decalogue
succinctly and judiciously expounded, with additions. London, 1641.
Generally attributed to Bishop Andrewes, but an old hand in manuscript
in the British Museum copy attributes it to Ussher.
E. 1185. The Two Covenants from Sinai and Sion drawn up catecheti-
cally and plainly, Together with a brief appendix directed about the use
of the New Covenant in a practical way. Published for the benefit
especially of the inhabitants of Eastham by Samuel Slater. London,
1644. The other catechisms in the volume are given on p. Ixxxi.
Ixxviii LIST OF CATECHISMS.
A Practical Catechism, of purpose framed for the help of such as desire
to enjoy more sweet and intimate soul commumion with Christ in that
sacred ordinance of his own Supper, by Samuel Austin, an unworthy
minister of Jesus Christ. London, 1647.
A Short Catechisme, being a brief instruction of the ignorant before
the receiving of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper by Mr. Obadiah
Sedgwick. London.
The Grounds of Divinitie plainly discovering the mysteries of
Christian Religion, propounded in questions and answers substantially
proved by Scriptures expounded faithfully according to the writings
of the best Divines, and evidently applied by profitable uses, corrected
and enlarged by Elnathan Parr, Minister of the Word. Eighth edition.
London, 1636.
A Briefe Methode of Catechising wherein are handled those foure
points, etc. The same points are also contracted, and a form of
examining communicants added. The sixteenth edition penned and
amended by the author. London, 1610.
A Book of Christian Questions and Answeres, wherein are set forth
the chiefe points of Christian Religion, a worke right necessarie and
profitable for all such as shall have to deale with the captious quarrel-
lings of the wrangling adversaries of God's trueth. London, anno 1581.
Appended to the Catechism is the "Ladder to Thrifte," some steps of
which are : —
1. To take thy calling thankfullj'- and shunne the path to beggery.
2. To grudge in youth no drudgerie to come by knowledge perfectly.
28. To bear thy crosses patiently for worldly things are slippery.
31. To pray to God continually to aid thee 'gainst thine enemie.
32. To spend the Sabbath holily and help the poore in miserie, etc.
These be the steppes unfeinedly to climbe to thrifte by husbandrie.
A Briefe Catechisme so necessary and easie to be learned even by the
simple sort that whosoever cannot or will not attaine to the same is no:^
to be accounted a good Christian, much lesse to be admitted to the Supper
of the Lorde. London, 1582.
Briefe Principles of Religion for the exercise of youth, done by
Christopher Watson. London, 1581.
A Little Catechism, that is to say, a short instruction touching
Christian Religion, set forth by Theodorus Beza, Minister of the Church
of God at Geneva. It is said at the end to have been imprinted at
London by Hugh Singleton, dwelling at Creed Lane, at the Sign of Gylden
Tunn nere unto Ludgate cuvii privilegio Anno 1578. Another edition
in 1579.
A Preparation unto the waie of lyfe with a direction unto the right
use of the Lorde's Supper, gathered by William Hopkinson, Preacher of
the Word of God. Imprinted at London, 1583.
A Catechisme with a prayer annexed meete for all Christian families.
Imprinted at London by Ch. B. for H. S.
A Catechisme containing the summe of Christian Religion, giving a
^
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxix
most excellent light to all those that seek the pathway to salvation.
Newlie set forth by G, G. (George Gyffard), Preacher of God's Word at
Maiden, Essex. London, 1583.
A Short Catechisme for Householders with prayers to the same
adjoyning. Hereunto are added under the answer unto every question
the proofs of the Scripture for every point of said Catechisme, gathered
by John Stockwood, Schoolmaster of Tunbridge. London, 1583.
Short Questions and Answeares, etc., Dawson. London, 1584. Its ^
first question and answer are " Wherefore hath God made, sanctified, and
preserved you? A. To seek his glory, Romans xi. 30."
Certain Short Questions and Answeres, very profitable and necessary
for all young children, and such as are desirous to be instructed in the
principles of the Christian Faithe. Imprinted at London, 1584.
An Abridgment of the former treatise for the help of such as are
desirous "to learn by heart the chief principles of Christian Religion."
Certaine Necessarie Instructions meet to be taught the yonger sort
before they come to be partakers of the Holy Communion. To this is
appended Certaine Articles very necessarie to be knowen of all yong
scholiers of Christe's School. The first is, " that the end of our creation
is to glorify God."
The Ground of Christianity, composed in a dialogue between Paul and
Titus, containing all the principall poyntes of our Salvation in Christ.
London, 1584. The first question and answer are, " What is the chiefest
duety of a Christian man in this life? The chiefest duety of man,
and not of man onely, but of all the creatures in the world in their
nature, is to set forth the glory of God."
A Short Summe of the whole Catechism, wherein the question is pro-
pounded and answered in few words for the greater ease of the common
people and children. London, Waldegrave, 1584. (Second Edition of
Craig's Catechism. The first was printed in 1581.)
A Brief and Short Catechism, necessary for all them that would be
Christians indeed to be able to understand and answer to. The preface
to the reader is signed by Thomas Sparks. To the question, " To what
end hath he made man ? " the answer is returned, '" To the setting forth
of his own glorie, and that man should serve him."
A Short and Fruitfull Treatise of the benefit and necessitie of cate-
chising, that is, of instructing the youth and ignorant persons in the
principles and grounds of Christian Religion. Hereunto is added, at the
latter end of the preface, a brief method of catechising, etc., gathered,
corrected, and now once again augmented by R. C. (Cawdrey). London,
1604. The following is appended : —
" Seven Observations which every Christian ought to labour to have
the reverent preparation of themselves to the reading and hearing of in
the Word of God, by R. C. 1. Wisdome to understand it, James i. 5 ;
1 Kings iii. 9 ; 2 Chron. i. 10. 2. Diligence to continue, 2 Tim.
iii. 14; 1 Tim. iv. 16; John viii. 31, 32. 3. Preparation for the
manner of reading, Eccles. iv. 17. 4. Meditation and conference for
Ixxx LIST OF CATECHISMS.
the better keeping of the matter, Deut. vi. 6, 7, etc. 5. Faith to
believe it, Heb. iv. 2 ; Jude ver. 20, 21. 6. Obedience to practise it,
1 Sam. XV. 22, 23 ; Jer. vii. 23. 7. Prayer for a blessing upon it,
Matt. xxi. 22 ; Mark xi. 24 ; James i. 5."
The English Catechisme explained, or a Commentarie on the Short
Catechisme, set forth in the Book of Common Prayer, wherein divers
necessary questions touching Christian faith are inserted, modern con-
troversies handled, doubts resolved, and many cases of conscience cleared.
Profitable for ministers in their churches, for schoolmasters in their
schooles, and for householders in their families, whereunto is added an
antidote against Poperie, by John Mayer, D.D., 4th. edition. London^
1630.
E. 1186. — 1. The Soldiers' Catechism, for soldiers of the Parliament's
Army, teaching them their calling was lawful, and they should be
Christian as well as courageous soldiers.
2. A Catechisme for children in yeares and children in understanding,
chiefly intended for their instruction in the family. London, 1644.
3. The Kernell of Christianity, etc., by Mr. Francis Peck, Pastor at
Hartford. London, 1644.
4. The New Catechism according to the form of the Kirk of Scotland,
etc., as reprinted in Pt. ii.
5. The Independent's Catechism, by John Bernard, philo-presbyter.
London, 1645.
6. The Parliament's Rules and Directions concerning Sacramental
Knowledge, etc., as reprinted in Pt. i.
7. The Cavalier's Catechism and Confession of his Faith. London,
1646-7.
8. A New Catechism commanded to be set forth for the instruction of
all those who still affect a reading ministry and the Common Prayer.
London, 1646-7.
9. Milk for Babes drawn out of the breasts of both Testaments,
chiefly for the spiritual nourishment of Boston babes in either England ;
but may be of like use for any children, by John Cotton, B.D., and
Teacher of the Church of Boston, New England. London, 1646.
10. A Short Catechism, holding forth and explaining the first prin-
ciples of the Oracles of God. London, 1646. Seems to follow the Six
Principles of Perkins, but shortens both questions and answers.
11. Children's Bread, or a Brief e Forme of Christian Doctrine neces-
sarie for the instruction of such as are ignorant, and for the edification
of such as have attained some measure of knowledge, by Tho. Wool-
fall, Minister of the Gospel, and Pastor of Staunton, in Northumber-
land. London, 1646.
12. A Catechism of several heads of Christian Religion, etc., by
Dorothy Burch, Stroud, Kent. London, 1646.
13. A Short Catechism for examination of Communicants, etc. Like
No. 6, modelled on Parliament's Ordinance. London, 1646.
14. Parliament's New and Perfect Catechism, fit and necessary to be
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxi
known and practised by every old Christian and loyal subject. 1647.
Political and Satirical.
15. Another edition of Cotton's Catechism, No. 9. London, 1648.
E. 1185. — 1. A New Catechisme, etc., written by William Good,
Minister at Denton in Norfolk (one of the added members of the
Westminster Assembly). London, 1644. Like Larger Catechism, ex-
plains what communicant must do before receiving the Communion,
what after he has received, and what at the time of receiving.
2. A Short Catechisme composed according to the rules and directions
of the Parliament, etc., by J. B., Minister at Bradford in Somerset.
[For No. 3 see p. Ixxvii.]
4. A Short Catechisme for the instruction of the inhabitants of S. M.,
for the better preparation for the Sacranient of the liOrd's Supper.
London, 1645.
5. Soldiers' Catechism.
6. Another cojjy of Good's Neio Catechisme.
7. A Catechism for the Times.
8. The Anabaptist's Catechism.
9. 10, 11. Catechisms founded on the Rules and Directions contained
in the Ordinance of Parliament. No. 9 contains the following questions
and answers : — Q. " What is faith ? A. A. grace whereby we receive
Christ as our perfect Saviour, and rest upon him alone for salvation.
Q. What is the special use of Baptism ? A. To ingraft us into
Christ." Q. What is the special use of the Lord's Supper ? A. 1. To
make us remember Christ's death; 2. To make us grow in grace."
The Worthy Communicant, whereunto is added a Dialogue between a
Minister and a private Christian, by Jeremiah Dyke. London, 1645.
Christianse Catecheseos, Sciographia, etc. Autore Reverendo et Claris-
simo viro D. Gulielmo Amesio, S.S.T, Doctore, etc. Amstelodami, 1635.
A Heli^e to True Happiness, or a briefe and learned exposition of the
maine and fundamentall points of Christian Religion, by Mr. Paul
Bayne. London, 1618. (My copy of this treatise bears the autograph
of Jeremiah Burro wes.)
"Etolx^lcoo-is eloquiorum Dei sive Methodus Religionis Christianae, by
John Adamson, Principal of University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, 1637.
A Catechism of Christian Religion . . . for the use of the Kirke of
Edinburgh. Edinburgh, 1615. Translation of Heidelberg Catechism,
appended to Hart's Psalm-book.
The Key of Saving Knowledge, wherein the Principles of Christian
Religion are unfolded, by George Walker, B.D. London, 1641.
IN LIBRARY OF QUEENS' COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE.
The Doctrine of the Bible, or Rules of Discipline breafly gathered
through the whole course of Scri])ture, by way of questions and answers,
newly corrected and amended. London, Brewster and Reid, 1633.
A Brieviate of Saving Knowledge, or the Principles of Christian
Ixxxii LIST OF CATECHISMS.
Religion methodically digested into short questions and answers, pur-
posely composed and published for the use and benefit of such as have
good desires but weak memories, by J. B. (John Brinsley). London,
1643.
A Short Catechisme necessary to be learned by all such as come to the
Holy Communion, according to the late Ordinance of Parliament. . . .
Humbly commended by the author for uniformity's sake to all the
Churches of England, by J. Mayer, D.D. London, 1646.
A Short Sum of Christianity, delivered by way of Catechism by that
Eev. and famous divine, William Whitaker, Dr. in Divinity. London,
1630. It contains the following questions and answers : — Q. What is
the only thing whereunto all our endeavours ought to be directed?
A. To seek everlasting felicity or salvation in this life, that we may
fully enjoy it in the life to come. Q. What is salvation? A. Perfect
happiness of soul and body for ever. Q. How may we know wherein
this consists ? A. By the Scriptures. Q. What be the Scriptures? A.
The writings of the apostles and prophets inspired of God, containing
a rule of life, to be used of all men, whereby they may be made wise
unto salvation. . . . Q. What of God as he is in himself ? A. That he
is a spirit, infinite, eternal, present everywhere, knowing all things,
most just, most merciful, omnipotent." Whitaker had the very highest
reputation as a learned and orthodox theologian. In early life he had
translated Nowell's Catechism into Greek, and if his own Catechism
was not published till 1630, in all probability it circulated about Cam-
bridge either in MS. or privately printed at a considerably earlier date,
and may have led Perkins, Preston, Tuckney, and others, when College
tutors, to draw up similar manuals.
IN LIBRARY OF EMMANUEL COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE.
A Short Catechism for householders with prayers to the same adjoining,
by W. Jaggard. 1620.
The Foundations of Christian Religion gathered into six principles, etc.
Perkins, London, 1618.
A Brief Method of Catechising, etc., by St. Egerton. The 31st edition,
newly perused and amended by the author. London, 1621.
A Short and Brief e Summe of Saving Knowledge, etc., by A[lexander]
R[ichardson]. Ljondon, 1621.
Milke for Babes, or a North Countrey Catechisme, made plain and
easie to the capacity of the simplest, with household prayers for families
and graces for children. The 4th impression, corrected and enlarged by
the author, William Crashaw, B.D., and Preacher of the Word of God at
Whitechapell. London, 1622.
Short Questions and Answeares, etc. London, Dawson, 1581, and again,
1622.
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxiii
The Tree of Good and Evil, or a profitable and familiar exposition of
the Commandments, by Thomas Granger, Preacher of God's Word.
London, 1616.
An edition of Ball's Short Catechism bearing the date 1616.
A Brief Summe of Christian Religion, or of things most necessary for
a Christian's knowledge, practice, and comfort ; composed by Thomas
Greaves, a Minister of the Gospel, " .Simplex breve plenum ut simplicitas
audientium consulat rusticitati, brevitas memorise, plenitudo doctrinse."
Augustinus, London, 1656.
3. A Pastime for Parents, etc., by Arthur Dent, etc. London, 1609.
Short Grounds of Catechism, by W. Ward of Guysborough, Yorkshire.
Camhridge, 1627.
This Library also contains coi)ies of Wilkinson's Catechisme, 3d edition,
and of Horn's Brief Instructions for Children. London, 1654.
IN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, CAMBRIDGE.
A Practical Catechism, or a view of those principall truths of the
Word which most directly tend to life and godliness, the 2d edition
enlarged, by D. R., B.D. London, 1633.
This Library contains also copies of Jaggard's Short Catechism for
Householders, 1614 ; and of Egerton's Brief Method of Catechising,
22d edition, 1615 ; and of Short Questions and Answeares. Dawson,
London, 1614.
IN TRINITY COLLEGE LIBRARY, CAMBRIDGE.
A Cathechisme conteining the summe of Christian Religion, giving a
most excellent light to all those that seek to enter the pathway to salva-
tion, newly set forth by G. G. (George Gyflfard). London, 1583.
A Fourme of Catechising in True Religion, consisting in questions and
answers with observations thereon for the further declaration and use of
the same. Dawson & Bishop, 1581. At the end of the dedication is
the name of W. Wood at Middleton Cheinay.
Certayne Short Questions and Answeres very profitable and necessary
for yong children and such as are desirous to be instructed in the
principles of the Christian Fayth. Middleton and Man, 1580.
A Shorte and Fruitfull Treatise of the profite and necessitie of
catechising, that is, of instructing the youth and ignorant persons in the
principles and grounds of Christian Religion, by Robert Caudrey, one of
the ministers and ])reachers of the Word of God in the County of Rutland.
London, 1580. At the end of Caudrey's Treatise is a copy of the
injunction of the High Commissioners, headed by Grindal, Archbishop of
Canterbury, and bearing the date of 1576, "that no youth be admitted
to the Lord's table, or to be married, or to be godfather or godmother
for any child except they can answer the Little Catechism with additions.'"
Ixxxiv LIST OF CATECHISMS.
A Brief and Short Catechisme necessarie for all tliem that would be
Christians indeed to be able to understand and to answer unto. Newberie,
London. The address to the Christian reader is signed by Tho. Sparke.
The Cathechisme or Manner how to instruct and teach children and
others in the Christian faith, etc., newly translated out of Latin and
Dutch into English (Heidelberg Catechism). London, 1578.
A Fruitfull Treatise of Baptisme and the Lord's Supper : of the use
and effect of them ; of the worthie and unworthie receivers of the same
supper ; very necessarie for all such as are to be admitted to the Lorde's
table. Wogran, London.
This Library also contains copies of Gee's Grounds of Christianity, and
of Craig's Short Sum of Whole Catechism. All the foregoing are included
in the volume bearing the press-mark C 5.25. In C 24.20 there is a
Short Catechisme, holding forth and explaining the first principles of the
oracles of God, apparently founded on that of Perkins, and bearing the
date of 1646.
IN THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY, OXFORD.
S. 302, S. Molineux — contains the following catechisms : —
1. Bernard's Catechism. London, 1632.
2. The Necessity and Antiquity of Catechising, by J. F. London, 1617.
3. The Principles of the true Christian Religion briefly selected out of
manie good bookes. First reade and then judge. London, 1590. The
preface is signed by Switherne Buttertield. The treatise expounds the
Creed, Ten Commandments, Lord's Prayer, and Sacraments, but not in
the form of question and answer.
4. A Short and plain Tractate of the Lord's Supper grounded upon 1
Corinthians xi. 23, by William More, Minister of God's Word. London,
1645.
5. A Brief Dialogue concerning preparation for the worthy receiving of
the Lord's Supper, taken for the most part out of the sermons of
Dodd and Cleaver touching that subject. London, 1633,
6. Maine's Catechism Abridged, or the ABC enlarged, with many
necessary questions fitted into it for the benefit of all that desire to teach
or learn it effectually, etc. 7th edition. London, 1639.
7. A Pill to purge out Popery, etc. London, 1624.
8. Contemplations for the institution of children in the Christian
Religion, collected and published by John Carpenter.
9. A Short Catechism, very necessary for the plain understanding of
the principal points of Christian Religion meet to be practised of all
Christians before they be admitted to the Lord's Supper. Richard Cox,
London, 1620.
10. A Short Catechism for householders. London, 1624.
This catechism, begins : Q. What should be the chief desire and
endeavour of every Christian in this life? A. To seek the glory of God
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxv
and to obtain happiness and salvation of his own soul. Q. How may we
obtain that? A. B}^ keeping covenant with God, etc.
11. A Brief and necessary Catechism concerning the principal! points
of Christian Religion, written for the good of all such as seek after Con-
solation in Christ, by E.. C. London, 1602.
12. A Brief Catechism of Christian Eeligion compressed into a short
volume containing in it four little books : the lirst treateth of Sacraments
in general, the second of Baptism, the third of Circumcision, the fourth
of the Lord's Supper, collected out of divers places of Scripture, very
necessary for all that desire to know the sacraments and the benefits that
we receive by them. London, 1581.
Th. Sc. 17. BS.— 1. The Rules and Directions of the Ordinance of
Parliament concerning suspension from the Lord's Supper in case of
ignorance, resolved into a Short Catechism. London, 1648.
2. A Scripture Catechism, very useful in these times for advancing
truth, suppressing error, settling present controversies, vindicating the
Covenanted Reformation. London, 1646.
3. Scripture Security for Conscience, reconciling the safety of truth
with the safety of persons by an honest counterplot to keep off the
execution of an expected Ordinance. It is a defence of the Ordinance
against heresies and blasphemies, turning its provisions into a Catechism,
and backing them with Scripture.
4. Children's Bread, or A Brief Form of Christian Doctrine, necessary
for the instruction of such as are ignorant, and for the edification of such
as have attained some measure of knowledge, by Tho. Woolfall, Staunton,
Northumberland. London, 1646.
5. A Catechisme in brief questions and answers, containing such
things as are to be known or had by all such as would partake of the
Sacrament of the Lord's Supper with comfort, by John Geree, sometime
minister of the Word in Tewxbury, now pastor of St. Faith's. London,
1647.
6. A Catechism for Children in years, and children in understanding,
etc. the second impression, by J. S. of Tenby. London, 1650.
7. The Principles of the Doctrine of Christ unfolded in two short
Catechisms, etc., for the use of the congregation of Fordham in Essex, by
John Owen, pastor thereof. 1645.
8. The Chief Grounds of Christian Religion set down by way of
catechising, etc., by Ezekiel Rogers. London, 1648.
9. The Enlargement of a former Catechism which contained in briefe
the grounds and principles of Christian Religion. That shewed what we
ought to believe, this upon what ground we ought so to believe, both
which are necessary in the faith of every Christian, gathered at the first
and since enlarged by D. V., etc. London, 1641.
10. A Catechism of Christians, to help them in the right understanding
of their Christian obligation by baptism, by Richard Hunt, M.A., some-
time Fellow of Emmanuel College in Cambridge. London, 1649.
11. Short Principles of Religion. London, 1644.
Ixxxvi LIST OF CATECHISMS.
12. A Scripture Enquiry or help for the memory in duties of Piety, by
T. B[elke]. London, 1G42.
13. The Main Points of Church Government and Discipline, etc., by
Chr[istopher] Love. London, 1649.
14. The Kernell of Christianity, containing a short yet full sumrae of
our Communion with Christ, by Fr. Peck, M.A. and pastor of Hartford.
London, 1646.
Sop. 270. Th. — 1. The Summe of Christian religion comprehended in
six principal questions, serving for the instruction of the simpler sort,
etc. London, 1617.
2. The Principles of Christian religion breefly set down in questions
and answers, very necessary and profitable for all persons before they be
admitted to the Lord's Supper, by William Attersol. London, 1635.
3. The Householder's help for domesticall discipline, or A familiar con-
ference of household instruction and correction fit for the godly govern-
ment of Christian families, dedicated to all religious householders, by
R. R., Minister of God's Word. London, 1615.
4. Directions for the worthy receiving of the Lord's Supper, with some
few questions to the same purpose, by Robert Jenison, B.D., at Newcastle-
upon-Tyne. London, 1624.
5. A Briefe Dialogue concerning preparation for the worthy receiving
of the Lord's Supper, etc. London, 1627. Earlier edition of Catechism
in S. 302.
6. Winter Evening's Communication with young novices in religion, or
Questions and Answers about certain chief grounds of Christian Religion,
wherein every answer rightly understood hath the force of an oracle of
God, by John Carter, preacher of God's Word. Cambridge, 1628.
7. A Catechism contayning a short exposition of the points in the
ordinary Catechism, etc. — being 2d edition of Wilkinson's Catechism.
London, 1624.
8. The Principal Grounds of Christian Religion briefly and plainly pro-
pounded — Byfield's Manual. London, 1625.
9. A Brief and Necessary Catechism, with a short instruction for all
that do receive the Holy Communion, by R. Jones. London.
10. A Catechisme composed according to the order of the Catechism of
the Common Prayer Booke, etc., by M. N[icholls], B.D., P.P. 2d edition.
London, 1631.
11. A Brief and Necessary Catechism concerning the principal points
of our Christian Religion, Written for the good of all such as seek after
consolation in Christ, by R. C, etc. London, 1602.
12. Certain Briefe Questions and Answers concerning the chief poynts
of Christian Religion gathered for the use of the young people of the
parish of S. Andrewes, Eastcheap, and may serve generally for all places,
by N. A. London. Along with various graces and prayers, it contains the
Confession adopted by Knox's congregation at Geneva.
13. A Briefe Exposition of the Principles of Christian Religion gathered
out of the Holy Scriptures for the benefit of all that are desirous to heare
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxvii
sermons and to receive the Sacraments with comfort, by R. Webb.
London, 1617.
14. A Short Summe of the whole Catechism wherein the question is pro-
pounded and answered for the greater ease of the common peoj^le and
children of St. Saverie's (Saviour's) in Southwarke, first gathered by Mr.
Thomas llatcliffe, Minister of God's Word in S. S. Southwarke. London,
1619. (The title is almost or altogether identical with that of Craig's
Catechism, Edinburgh, 1581.) 8° m. 188, contains Twisse, Palmer,
Bernard, Gouge, Ball, etc.
Art. Bs, besides Hieron's and Burton's Catechisms and Gardiner's
Confession and Catechism for Householders, contains also —
A Breefe Explanation of the Common Catechism distinguished into three
parts : 1, of the privileges ; 2, of the duties of a Christian ; 3, of the Holy
Sacraments, the pledges and bonds both of the one and the other, by B*^.
Allein, pastor of Ditchart in Somersetshire. 2d edition, London, 1631.
The Sweet Milke of Christian Doctrine in a plain and natural method
by question and answer for their better understanding for whom it is
chiefly written. London, 1617. The Epistle to the inhabitants and
people of Leigh, Essex, is signed by John Syme. The three first questions
and answers are similiar in purport to those in the Shorter Catechism.
Th. 8vo, C. 170. — The Elements of the Beginning of the Oracles of God
containing the whole grounds of Christian Religion in a Short Catechism
for yong children and a larger method of catechising, etc. London, 1619.
Th. 8vo, m. 56. Motives to Godly knowledge, with a brief instruction
very necessary to be learned and understood of every one before he be
admitted to partake of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper, also a sweet
comfort for a Christian being tempted. London, 1613.
Spirituall Food and Physicke, viz., Milke for the yonger. Meat for the
stronger. The Substance of Divinity, And a pill to purge out Popery. The
4th edition, corrected and enlarged by the author, John Mico, preacher of
God's Word in Exeter. London, n.d.
IN LAMBETH LIBRARY, LONDON.
XpLOTtaviariiov ^Toixeicoais, probably Whitaker's Greek translation of
Nowell's Catechism published in London by John Day, 1578.
The Humble Advice of the Assemblie of Divines now by authority of
Parliament sitting at Westminster concerning A Shorter Catechism with
the Poofs {sic) thereof out of the Scriptures presented by them lately to
both Houses of Parliament. John Streaton, London.
A Light from Christ leading unto Christ by the star of his word, or
A Divine Directory to self-examination, the better to prepare for a trial
and approbation of knowledge and their graces in such as by the minister
and elders are to be admitted into a Reformed Church Communion
to i^artake of soul-cherishing virtue from Christ at the Lord's table ;
profitable for persons and families in private, or congregations in public ;
Ixxxviii LIST OF CATECHISMS.
by Imraannel Bourne, M.A., of Asheover, in the County of Darby,
Preacher of the Gospel to the congregation of St. Sepulchre's Church,
London. The 2d edition, Wright, London, 1647. This treatise contains
both a large and shorter Catechism. It defines God as " a spirit infinite
in all })erfections," gives prominence to the Covenants, and defines faith
as " a special grace of God by which a man or woman is enabled to
receive Christ as he is held forth in the promise of the gospel and to rest
upon him alone for salvation." It enumerates as benefits bestowed by
Christ on his people: 1. Election; 2. Redemption; 3. Effectual Vocation;
4. Free Justification ; 5. Sanctification ; 6. Adoption ; 7. Spirit's
presence and work. The Library also contains a coj>y of Alsted's Latin
Catechism, of date mdcxxii.
In K12.52, prefixed to Culverwell's Treatise of Faith, are Questions
and Answers upon a small tract written by Mr. Ezekiel Culverwell,
touching the way to a blessed state in this life. The following are
specimens of these questions and answers : — " Q. What is the estate of
drowsie professors? A. A little grace they have but mixed with grosse
failings. Q. What is the estate of such as have more life of faith ?
A. They endeavour to walk every way unrebukably. Q. May such an
estate be enjoyed in this life? A. Yea, doubtless, after divers measures
according to the grace which they have received. Q. By what means
may siich a blessed state be enjoyed? A. By an often and j)lentiful
feeding upon Christ. Q. Why by feeding upon Christ? A. Because of
his fulness we receive grace for grace," etc. It bears the date of 1648.
In G15.80, besides several catechisms, there is a treatise on the Sacrament
by John Prime, which defines a Sacrament as " a sensible sign to the eyes,
instituted of God to be continued in His church for the further assurance
and increase of spiritual graces." The same Library contains a copy of the
Italian Catechism of Bernardino Ochino of Sienna, and two treatises of
Martinius of Bremen De Universd Doctrind Christiana.
IN SIGN COLLEGE LIBRARY, LONDON WALL.
1. A Treatise of Christian Religion on the whole body and substance
of Divinity by T. C. (Thomas Cartwright). London, 1616.
2. The Same Contracted into a Brief Catechisme. London, 1616.
This last was also published separately without the author's name or
initials. A copy of such an edition I have in my library, appended to
Knighte's " Exposition of the Ten Commandments."
IN SCOTTISH LIBRARIES.
The following are bound together in a volume kindly lent me from the
Library of the University of Edinburgh, viz.: — 1. Joshua's Resolution
for the Well-Ordering of his Household, a twofold Catechisme, one short,
the other more large, etc., by Richard Bernard, pastor at Batcombe, in
LIST OF CATECHISMS. Ixxxix
Somersetshire {London, 1625) ; 2. A Cateehisine, conteyning summarely
the chief points of Christian Religion, made dialogue-wise by brief
questions and short answers, written by Patrick Galloway, and by him
used in the famil}^ of the Scottish noblemen at Newcastle [London, 1588) :
3. A Short Catechisme, summarily comprising the principal points of
Christian Faith, somewhat corrected and augmented by James Balmford,
minister, etc., 6th edition [London, 1610) ; 4. A Short Catechisme,
wherein are briefly handled the fundamental principles of Christian
Eeligion, needfull to be learned of all Christians before they be admitted
to the Lord's Table, 8th edition, by William Gouge [London, 1636) ; 5.
Points of Instruction for the Ignorant, with an Examination before our
comming to the Lord's Table, etc., by Eobert Horn [London, 1613) ; 6.
The Doctrine of the Beginning of Christ ; short for memory, plain for
capacity, delivered almost in the express words of the text by Samuel
Hieron, minister of the Gospell [London, 1632) ; 7. A Brief and Necessarie
Catechisme, with a short instruction for all that doe receive the Holy
Communion, set forth by Richard Jones, schoolmaster at CardifFe
[London) ; 8. An Helpe for Young People, preparing them for the
worthy receiving of the Lord's Sapper, by W. L., B.D. [London, 1640)-;
9. Short Questions and Answeares, conteining the summe of Christian
Religion, newly enlarged with the testimonies of Scripture, etc., by
Robert Openshaw [London, 1633) ; 10. A Compendious Forme and
Summe of Christian Doctrine, called the testimonie of a true faith, etc.,
by Christopher Sbutte, M.A. [London, 1637); 11. The Summe of
Christian Religion comprehended in sixe principal questions serving
for instruction of the simpler sorts, etc., by John Sprint [London,
1607).
The following, contained in a volume kindly lent me from the Library
of the New College, Edinburgh, are all of them framed on the Calvinistic
system, and embody with more or less fulness the doctrine of the
Covenants as set forth in the Westminster standards, viz. : — 1. Short
grounds of Catechism delivered by way of question and answer, etc., by
William Ward, minister of the Word at Guysbrough, in Cleaveland,
within Yorkshire [Camhrid(/e, 1627) ; 2. Milk for Babes and Meat for
Men, or principles necessary to be known and learned of such as would
know Christ here or be known of him hereafter, by Hugh Peters, some-
time lecturer at St. Sepulchre's, London, now teacher in New England
[London, 1641) ; 3. The Principles of Christian Religion briefly set down
in questions and answers, very necessary and profitable for all persons
before they be admitted to the Lord's Supper, by William Attersoll
[London, 1635) ; 4. The Chief Heads of Divinitie briefly and orderly set
down in forme of catechising by question and answer [by William
Ames] [Dordrecht, 1612) ; 5. A Plaine and Familiar Exposition upon the
Creed, X. Commandments, Lord's Prayer, and Sacraments, etc., by
Josias White [London, 1632) ; 6. A Short Preparation to the worthy
receiving of the Lord's Supper by way of questions and answers, made
9
XC LIST OF CATECHISMS.
by John Baker, a Palatine exile, etc. (Lovdov, 1645) ; 7. A Brief
Method of Catechising, etc., by 8t. Egerton ; 8. A Path to Pietie, lead-
ing to the way, the truth, and the life — Christ Jesus, etc., by William
Hinde, preacher of God's Word at Bunbury, Cheshire [London, 1626) ;
9. A Forme of Catechising set down by questions and answers wherein
the principal grounds of Christian Keligion are delivered, by Edward
Elton, preacher of the Word of God in the parish of St. Mary Magdalene,
Bermondsey [London, 1634); 10. A Short Catechism, the 7th edition
[London, 1632) ; 11. A Key of Knowledge for catechising children in
Christ, by Richard AVebb, preacher of God's Word at Rodborough, in
Gloucestershire [London, 1622) ; 12. The Chief e Grounds of Christian
Religion set down by way of Catechising, gathered long since for the
use of an honourable family, by Ezekiel Rogers, minister of God's
Word, sometime of Rowley in Yorkshire, now in New England [London,
1642).
A volume in the Library of the Church of Scotland contains the
following : —
1. The Foundation of Christian Religion gathered into sixe Principles,
and it is to bee learned of ignorant people that thej' may bee fit to heare
sermons with profit and to receeve the Lord's Supper with comfort.
London, Leggat, 1635. This is Perkins' famous catechism. An earlier
edition in the British Museum has appended to it another catechism in
the manuscript, but the leaves have been misplaced in binding it.
2. A Short Catechisme. Seventh edition. London, 1632. Said to be
by White of Dorchester.
3. A Catechisme or Institution of Christian Religion to be learned of
all youth next after the little Catechisme appointed in the Booke of
Common I'rayer. Nowells, London, 1633.
4. The Doctrine of the beginning of Christ, etc., by Samuel Hieron,
minister of the gospell. London, 1635.
5. A Path to Pietie, leading to the way, the truth, and the life — Jesus
Christ, ... by William Hinde, . . . preacher of God's Word at Bunbury,
Cheshire. London, 1626.
6. Short Questions and Answeares contayning the Summe of Christian
Religion (Pagitt). London, Dawson, 1635.
7. A Briefe Catecheticall Exposition of Christian Doctrine, etc., as on
p. Ixxv. (Twisse's Catechism.) London, 1633.
8. Grounds of Christian Religion laid downe briefly and plainely by
way of Question and Answer, by H. B. (Henry Burton). L^ondon, 1636.
9. The Scope of the Scripture, containing a briefe exposition of the
Apostles' Creed, the tenne Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the
Sacraments, by short questions and answers ; by H. Vesey, late minister
of God's Word at H. B. in Essex. Ljondon, 1633.
10. A short Catfichisme wherein are briefly handled the fundamental!
principles of Christian Religion, etc., 7th edition, by William Gouge,
Ljondon, 1635,
LIST OF CATECHISMS. XCl
In a separate case in same Library : —
1. A Short Catechisme contayning the Principles of Religion, verie
profitable for all sorts of people (Ball's). 12th impression, London,
1628.
2. A brief and methodical Catechism (by Zachary Cawdrey). Lomlov,
1664.
3. Shorter Catechism in Hebrew, by W. Seaman, M.D. London, 1689.
CORRIGENDA.
Page xxvi, line 18, after copy insert of.
,, XXX vi, line 2&,for form read for.
,, xlii, line 22, for two or three read ten or twelve.
,, 70, line 11, delete comma after marvellous.
,. 84, line 32, before thyself insert to.
,, 96, line 9, for even read ever.
,, 236, line 18, /or breaking read, brawling.
,, 239, line 22, for o^ read on.
Part I.
THE SHORTER CATECHISM
OF THE
WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY
AND
ITS PURITAN PRECURSORS
THE SHOETEE CATECHISM
OF
THE WESTMINSTER ASSEMBLY OF DIVINES
COMPAJRED WITH
ITS PUEITAN PEECUESOES.
Quest. 1. What is the chief end of man ?
A. Man's chief end is to glorifie God, and to enjoy him for
Quest. 1. Q. Quis humanae yitae jyrcecipmis est finis ? Ut Deum . . . j^^i^
liomines ipsi noverint. — Calvin. A che fine e creato rhuonio ? Per ' '^VT*^ *'^
conoscer, amar et goder eternamente Deo. — Gagliardi. Para servir n / y^y'^o\
Dios en esta vida e despues della gozarle en la otra eternamente. — Spanish. / y^ ^ y < /
What is the chief and principal end of our being, etc. ? A. That we
may glorify God, and work out our own salvation. — Syme's Sweet Milk of
Christian Doctrine, 1617. Wherefore hath God made . . . you? A. To
seek His glory. — Pagefs Summe of Christian Religion; Openshaid's Smnme
of Christian Religion. That he . . . should seek God's glory and his own
salvation. — Rogers' Chief Grounds of Christian Religion. To glorify God
and save his soul. — BaWs Short Catechisms. To glorify God and save
his own soul. — Palmer^ s Endeavour of making the Princijjles of Christian
Religion easie.
Q. 2. What rule hath God given to direct us how ice may glorifie
and enjoy him ?
A. The AVord of God (which is contained in the Scriptures
of the Old and New Testament) is the onely rule to direct us
how we may glorifie and enjoy him.
QueH. 2. Q. What certain rule have tve left us for our direction in the
knowledge of the true religion ? — A. The holy Scriptures of the Old and
New Testament, etc. — Ussher^s Method of Christian Religio/i. The Word
of God contained in the Scriptures. — Ussher^s Principles of Christian
Religion. The holy Scriptures contained in the Old and New Testament.
— Gouge's Short Catechisme. The divine and sacred word of God, only
contained in the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament. — Syme.
— See also Ball, p. 67.
4 THE SHORTER CATECHISM.
Q. 3. ^Fhat do the Scriptures principally teach?
A. The Scriptures principally teach what man is to believe
concerning God, and what duty God requires of man.
Quest. 3. Q. How many things doth the Word teach iis principally ? —
Paget. — A.. All points of faith that we are bound to believe, and all good
duties that we are bound to practise. — Ussher^s Principles. Q. How
many things doth this ancient and apostolic belief teach you? — A. It
teacheth me what to believe first concerning God. — Egerton's Form of
Exaviining. They do teach me my duty to God and my neighbour. —
Bernard. What doth the Scripture especially teach us ? — Ball, p. 68.
Q. 4. What is God ?
A. God is a Spirit, infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, in his
being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth.
Quest. 4. God is a being infinite in all perfection. — Palmer. God is a
Spirit of infinite perfection. — Gouge. A most holy Spirit, infinite in all
perfections. — Ga. of 1646. God is one holy Spirit, having being of
himself. — Rogers. He is a Spirit, having his being of himself. — Ball.
God is a Spirit, or spiritual substance, most wise, most holy, eternal,
infinite. — Perkins' Foundation of Ghristian Religion; also Elton\s Form of
Gatechising. God is a Spirit, most perfect, most wise, almighty, and
most holy. — Ussher^s Principles. God is a Spirit, one, almighty, eternal,
infinite, unchangeable being, absolutely holy, wise, just, and good. —
J. F.^s Gompendious Gatechism. A spiritual, eternal, unchangeable, and
infinite being, {)erfectly good, just, holy, wise, and mighty. — White's Short
Gatechism. Q. Which be his chief properties ? — A, Infiniteness, eternity,
and unchangeableness, etc. — Rogers. Q. What be his communicable
properties ? — A. They are chiefly five : holiness, wisdom, power, justice,
and goodness, all which are eternal, infinite, and unchangeable like
himself. — Fgerton^s Brief Method. He is most holy, that is, of infinite
wisdom, mercy, love, goodness, etc. — Perkins. Infinite in his being . . .
in wisdom . . . iu power . . . injustice . . . and in mercy. — Bernard's
Larger Gatechism. Infinite in knowledge, wisdom, power, mercy, truth,
justice, love, and all perfection of blessedness whatsoever. — Webb's Key
of Knowledge. Infinite in time ... in place ... in wisdom ... in
power . . . in mercy . . . injustice . . . in glory and majesty. — Vesey's
Scope of the Scrip)ture.
Q. 5. Are there more Gods than one ?
A. There is but one onely, the living and true God.
Quest. 5. There is but one God. — Bedford, Palmer. There is but one
God only. — Newcomen. Q. Are there any more Gods than one ? — A. To
us there is but one God. — Hieron. No, there is only one God, though in
that one Godhead there be three persons. — Ussher's Principles. There is
but one God alone, distinguished into three persons. — Vesey. There is
THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 5
hut one onely, true, living, immortal and everlasting God. — Becon^s Kew .
Catechism. Q. How many Gods be there ? — A. Only one God. — Ball.
Q. 6. Hoio many jjersons are there in the Godhead ?
A. There are three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the
Son, and the Holy Ghost; and these three are one God, the
same in substance, equal in power and glory.
Quest. 6. There are three persons in the divine substance ... of the
same eternity, power, and majesty. — Becon. Three distinct persons, in
eternity, in power, in dignity equal, in Godliead one. — Nowell. Three
persons, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, eqnal in eternity, 'power, and
majesty.^ Fesey. There be three distinct persons, the Father, the Son,
and the Holy Ghost, and these three persons are equal in eternity and
ijlory. — Elton's Shorter Form of Catechising. See also Palmer, p. 100.
Q. 7. What are the decrees of God ?
A. The decrees of God are his eternal purpose, according to
the counsel of his will, whereby, for his own glory, he hath
fore-ordained whatsoever comes to pass.
Quest. 7. Q. What is God's decree ? — A. The eternal counsel and
purpose of God, whereby he set down within himself whatsoever should
come to pass in time. — Newcomen, Ball. It is his unchangeable appoint-
ment concerning all things. — Whitens Catechism. It is that act whereby
God, according to his free will, did fore-appoiat and determine of all
things . . . even from all eternity. — Ames' Chief Heads of Divinity.
He did, before all time, by his unchangeable counsel, ordain whatsoever
afterwards should come to pass. — Ussher's Prindi^les. God from all
eternity, according to his free will, did by his imchangeable counsel and
purpose fore-appoint and certainly determine of all things ... to the
manifestation of his own glory. — Ussher^s Body of Divinity. The fore-
appointing of all things before all time to his own glory. — Egerton.
Q. 8. How doth God execute his decrees ?
A. God executeth his decrees in the works of Creation and
Providence.
Quest. 8. Q. How is God's decree executed ? — A. By the creation of all
things, and by his providence. — White. In the works of the creation
and providence. — Ussher^s Method. In the works of creation and the
work of God's providence. — Dennison''s ComjJendious Catechism.
Q. 9. What is the ivork of Creation ?
A. The work of Creation is, God's making all things of
nothing, by the word of his power, in the space of six dayes,
and all very good.
6 THE SHORTER CATECHISM.
Quest. 9. God's making of the world and of all things out of nothing
by his word. — Baker^s Short Catechism. That work of God, wherein by
his word he made all things of nothing exceeding good. — White. God,
l)y his word alone, did in the space of six days, create all things . . .
every one of them exceeding good in their kind. — Ussher^s Method.
Q. How did God make all things?— A. By his word, of nothing, in six
days, very good. — Gouge. See also Ball, p. 69.
^.10. How did God create man ?
A. God created man male and female, after his own image,
in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, with dominion over
the creatures.
Quest. 10. A reasonable creature consisting of soul and body, made
after the image of God in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness. —
Honi's Points of Iiistructione. He made the man of the dust of the earth,
and woman out of man, and both of them, as well male as female, in his
own imar/e. Q. Wherein standeth the image of God ? — A. Chiefly in
these three things, knowledge, 7^ighfeousness, and true holiness. — Egerton.
In dominion over the creatures.— Elton. See also Palmer, p. 105.
Q. 11. What are God's works of Providence ?
A. God's works of Providence are, his most holy, wise, and
powerful preserving and governing all his creatures, and all
their actions.
Quest. 11. His preserving and governing his creatures with all things
belonging unto them. — Ussher. AVith all their actions. — Ball. God's
preserving and governing of all things made. — Baker. That work of
God whereby he sustaineth all things by his power, and directeth them
by his wisdom to their appointed ends. — White. The ruling and govern-
ing of all things most wisely, mightily, and righteously. — Egerton.
Q. 12. What speciall act of providence did God exercise toward
man in the estate wherein he was created ?
A. When God had created man, he entred into a covenant
of life v/ith him, upon condition of perfect obedience ; forbid-
ding him to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil,
upon pain of death.
Quest. 12. Q. What is that special order of government which God
used toward man in the beginning ? — A. It pleased Almighty God to
enter into covenant with man, the sum of which covenant was : Do this
and live ; if thou doest it not thou shalt die the death. — Ames. Q. How
did God deal with man after he made him? — A. He made a covenant
with Adam, and in him with all mankind. — Usshe^-'s Principles. Promis-
ing everlasting life upon condition that he perform entire and perfect
THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 7
obedience unto his law . . . and in like sort threatening death unto him
if he did not perform the same. — Ussher's MetJiod.
Q. 13. Did our first parents continue in the estate icherein they
were created ?
A. Our first parents, being left to the freedom of their own
will, fell from the estate wherein they were created, by sinning
against God.
Quest. 13. Q. Did man continue in the estate in which he was created?
— A. No ; he left it and fell from righteousness to sin. Q. How did our
first parents yield to temptation being created good ? — A. Being left by-
God to the liberty and mutability of their own will they voluntarily
inclined to that evil to which they were tempted. — Ussher. Being left
of God to the liberty of his ivill, etc. — Rogers. Q. Did man and woman,
thus made, continue in this holy and blessed state ? — A. No ; they fell
from it and became cursed and miserable creatures. Q. How did they
fall? — A. By the enticement of the devil and their own wilful dis-
obedience in breaking the commandment of God. — Egerton.
Q. 14. What is sin?
A. Sin is any want of conformity unto, or transgression of,
the Law of God.
Quest. 14. Peccatum est quicquid non congruit cum norma legis divinae
. . . est defectus vel inclinatio vel actio pugnans cum lege Dei. — Chytraei
Catechesis. Any breach of the law of God, if it he no more than the lea^t
want of that which the law requireth. — PerTcins ; also Ussher's Body of
Divinity. Any swerving from the law of God, though it be but in the
least want, etc., as above. — Elton. A transgression of the law either in
want of vjhat, or doing otherwise than what, the law requireth. — Josias
White. Any declination from, or transgression of, the law of God. —
Neivcomen.
Q. 15. JVhat was the sin tvherehy our first parents fell from the
estate wherein they ivere created ?
A. The sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate
wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden fruit.
Quest. 15. Disobedience against God in eating the forbidden fruit. —
Ca. of 1646. In general it was disobedience, the degrees whereof were
first infidelity, then pride, and lastly the disavowing of subjection, by
eating the forbidden fruit, — Ames. The eating of the forbidden fruit. —
Ball.
^.16. Did all mankinde fall in Adams first transgression?
, A. The Covenant being made with Adam, not onely for
8 THE SHORTER CATECHISM.
himself, but for his posterity, all mankind, descending from
him, by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him,
in his first transgression.
Quest. 16. Q. Did this estate determine in Adam's person? — A. No;
for he was the head and root of all mankind, who had received grace and
strength for himself and all his posterity, and so lost the same for all,
and now we are all conceived and born in sin and unto misery. — Ames.
All we that are their children are guilty of the same sin, for we all
sinned in them. — Ussher''s Principles. In the first covenant the sin of
the tirst Adam is reckoned to all the posterity that descend from him by
carnal generation, because they were in him, and of him, and one with
him. — Ussher's Body of Divinity. Q. In whom is that corruption found?
— A. In all . . . descending from Adam by natural generation. — Elton.
Q. 1 7. Into what estate did the fall hring manklnde ?
A. The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and
misery.
Quest. 17. Q. What are you since by Adam's fall? — A. A sinner, and
by sin subject to all kind of misery and punishments. — Horn. We are
conceived in sin and born in iniquity unto misery. — Ussher.
Q. 18. Wlierein consists the sinfulness of that estate whereinto
man fell ?
A. The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consists
in the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of Original righteous-
ness, and the corruption of his whole nature, (which is commonly
called Original Sin,) together with all actuall transgressions
which proceed from it.
Quest. 18. First, the corruption of nature called original sin, . . . and
then actual sin arising from hence. — Ussher^s Method. Q. Wherein doth
that originall sinne consist ? — A. First, in the imputation of that siune
which in our first parents we did commit ; secondly, in the want of God's
righteous and holy image ; thirdly, in that inclination which we have
unto evill ; and, lastly, in the first motions of evill that arise therefrom.
— Ames. Guiltiness in Adam's first offence, that is, a deprivation of all
good thereby, and a disposition of my whole heart to everything that is
against the law, with innumerable corrupt fruits thereof in thought,
word, and deed, — Horn. First, in the guilt of that one rebellious act in
Adam ; secondly, in corruption thence lineally derived, in full want of all
saving grace, and depravation of all the faculties and powers of soul and
body, and proneness of the same to all evil continually. — Syme's Christian
Doctrine. The guiltiness of Adam's sin, and the disorder of the whole
man, brought upon all mankind by the fall of Adam, whereby they want
the righteousness which ought to be in them, and have that unrighteous-
THE SHORTER CATECHISM. 9
ness which ought not to be in them, which makes them inclinable to
actual sin, being the fountain thereof. — Elnathan Parr. Q. Wherein
doth the sinfulness that is in us consist ? — A. In our sin both original
and actual. Original sin is, first, the loant of that original righteousness
that once was, and still ought to be, in man ; and, secondly, an hereditary
corruption of his ivhole nature. Actual sin is that sin which proceeds from
the corruption of nature, etc. — Vesey.
Q. 19. What is the misery of that estate ichereinto man fell 2
A. All mankinde by their fall lost communion with God, are
under his wrath and curse, and so, made liable to all miseries
in this life, to death itself, and to the pains of hell for ever.
Quest. 19. He is continually subject to the curse of God in his lifetime,
in the end of his life, and after this life. — Perkins. Liable to God's curse
for sin, etc., as above. — Elton. The lorath and cwse of God, by whose just
sentence man for his sin is delivered into the power both of bodily and
spiritual death, begun here, and to be accomplished in the life to come. —
Ussher. TAe foss 0/ &Ws /aroi^r and former happiness, . . . the curse of
God, . . . all miseries in this life, death in the end, and hell ever after. —
Efjerton.
Q. 20. Did God leave all mankinde to perish in the estate of sin
and misery ?
A. God having, out of his meer good pleasure, from all eter-
nity, elected some to everlasting life, did enter into a Covenant
of grace, to deliver them out of the estate of sin and misery,
and to bring them into an estate of salvation by a Eedeemer.
Quest. 20. Q. Did God leave mankind in this woeful state ? — A. No ;
but of his free and undeserved mercy entered into a new covenant with
mankind [by which] grace and life everlasting is freely offered by God
unto all that be made partakers of his Son Jesus Christ, who alone is
mediator between God and man. — Ussher's Principles.
Q. 21. Who is the Redeemer of God's Elect ?
A. The onely Eedeemer of God's Elect is the Lord Jesus
Christ, who, being the Eternal Son of God, became man, and so
was, and continueth to be, God and man in two distinct Natures,
and one Person, for ever.
Quest. 21. He is God the Son, the second person of the Trinity,
become man for us, by an inseparable and unfused union of his divine
and human natures and properties, and so is both God and man in one
person. — Syme. Jesus Christ, . . . the eternal Son of God, made man
in all things; even in his infirmities like other men, save only in sin. —
10 THE SHORTER CATECHISM.
Perkins. Jesus Christ, . . . the eternall Sonne of God, made man like
to us in all things, sin only excepted, and so God and man in one person.
— Elton. Q. What are we further to know and believe touching Christ's
being God and man ?— A. That these two natures are distinct one from
another, and that they are also united, and make but one person. — Elton.
Q. 22. How did Christ, being the Son of God, become man ?
A. Christ, the Son of God, became man, by taking to himself
a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the
power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, and
born of her, yet without sin.
Quest. 22. Q. How came Christ to be man ? — A. By taking our nature
to himself, being conceived by the Holy Ghost, and born by the Virgin
Mary. — Egerton's Brief Metliod, p. 6. He took to himself a true body,
and a reasonable soul, being conceived in time by the Holy Ghost, and
born of the Virgin Mary, and so became very man like unto us in all
things, even in our infirmities (sin only excepted). — Ussher.
Q. 23. What Offices doth Christ execute as our Redeemer?
A. Christ, as our Redeemer, executeth the Offices of a
Prophet, of a Priest, and of a King, both in his estate of
Humiliation and Exaltation.
Quest. 23. Q. What be the several functions and offices of Christ as he
is Mediator ? — A. These three : namely, his Prophetical, Priestly, and
Kingly Office. Christ was anointed to be the only Prophet, Priest, and
King of his church. — Elton. A. He is a Priest, a Prophet, and a King.
— Perkins. Q. Shew now in what state did Christ . . . perform this three-
fold office? — A. In a twofold estate : 1. Of abasement and humiliation;
2. Of advancement and exaltation. — Ussher.
Quests. 21 and 23. Jesus Christ our Lord, who being God, and there-
fore able, did take our nature upon him, that he might be fit to discharge
the offices of a prophet, priest, and king, as was required for the working
of our salvation. — Ames.
Q. 24. How doth Christ execute the office of a Prophet ?
A. Christ executeth the office of a Prophet, in revealing to
us, by his Word and Spirit, the will of God for our salvation.
Quest. 24. In that he declared the whole will of his Father by himself
and by his servants, and confirmed the same by so many signs and
wonders. — Ames. To reveal unto his church the way and means of sal-
vation, and this he doth outwardly by the ministry of his xoord, and in-
wardly hy the teaching of his Holy Spirit. — Perkins. That he might
reveal unto us the w^hole counsel and will of God concerning our salvation.
— Catechism q/" 1 6 1 9.
THE SHOllTER CATECHISM. 1 1
Q. 25. How doth Christ execute the office of a Priest ?
A. Christ executeth the office of a Priest, in his once offering
up of himself a sacrifice to satisfie divine justice, and reconcile
us to God ; and in making continuall intercession for us.
Quest. 25. Jesus Christ our High Priest became obedient even unto
the death, offering up himself a sacrifice once for all, to make a full satis-
faction for all our sins, and malceth continual intercession to the Father in
our name, whereby the wrath of God is appeased, his justice is satisfied,
and we are reconciled. — Ussher's Body of Divinity.
In that he was obedient unto the death, giving himself as a sacrifice,
and making intercession in our name, whereby, etc., as iu Ussher. —
Ames. First, by making satisfaction to his Father for the sin of man ;
secondly, by making intercession. — Perkins. Q. Why must he be a
priest?— A. To offer sacrifice for his church, and to reconcile us unto
God. — Ussher. That by the sacrifice of himself once offered, he might
reconcile vis unto God and continually make intercession for us. — C. 1619.
To make full satisfaction, and also continual intercession for us. — Gouge.
Q. 26. Hoiu doth Christ execute the office of a King ?
A. Christ executeth the office of a King, in subduing us to
himself, in ruling and defending us, and in restraining and con-
quering all his and our enemies.
Quest. 26. By all that power which he did manifest, as well in van-
quishing death and hell, as ingathering the people unto himself which'
he had formerly ransomed, and in ruling them being gathered, as also in
defending of them and applying those blessings unto them which he hath
purchased for them. — Aines, also Ussher. By an effectual bestowing of
grace upon his chosen subjects and destroying of his enemies. — Ca. of
1644. By ruling and defending of us by the power of his might and
Spirit. — Syme.
Q. 27. JFherein did Christ's Humiliation consist ?
A. Christ's Humiliation consisted in his being born, and that
in a low condition, made under the law, undergoing the miseries
of this life, the wrath of God, and the cursed death of the cross ;
in being buried, and continuing under the power of death for a
time.
Quest. 27. Q. What was his estate of humiliation ? — A. It was the base
condition of a servant whereto he humbled himself from his conception
to his cross, and so until the time of his resurrection. Q. Why is he said
to be born ? — A. To assure us of his true humanity, even by his infancy
and infirmity. Q. What are the more general things which he suffered
iu this life ? — A, Infirmities in his flesh, indignities from the world, and
12 THE SHORTER CATECHISM.
temptations from the Devil, [and] those manifold calamities, poverty,
hunger, thirst, weariness, reproach. Q. Unto what death was he so
obedient ? — A. Even unto the most reproachful, painful, and dreadful
death, the death of the cross. Q. What befel our Saviour after his soul
Avas separated from his body ? — A. He was buried, and went to Hades,
or, as we commonly speak, descended into hell. Q. What is meant by
this ?^A. That, departing this life, he went in his soul to heaven, and
was in his body under the very power and dominion of death for a season.
Q. Hitherto of his sufferings, what is the other part of his satisfaction ? —
A. His perfect righteousness, whereby he did that which we were not
able to do, and absolutely fulfilled the whole law of God for us. — Ussher's
Body of Divinity.
Q. 28. JVherein consisteth Chris fs Exaltation ?
A. Christ's Exaltation consisteth in his rising again from the
dead on the third day, in ascending up into Heaven, in sitting
at the right hand of God the Father, and in coming to judge the
world at the last day.
Quest. 28. Q. What is his estate of exaltation ? — A. His glorious con-
dition beginning at the instant of his resurrection and comprehending his
ascension, sitting at the right hand of God his Father, and the second
coming in glory to judge the world. — Usslier.
Q. 29. How are ive raade partakers of the Redemption purchased
hy Christ ?
A. We are made partakers of the Redemption purchased by
Christ, by the effectual Application of it to us by his Holy
Spirit.
How are men made partakers of the benefit of those things which Christ
did and suffered?— (?oi• Acts 7. S; I Tit. 3. 5.
Q. Who ought to be baptized ?
A. Infidels "^converted to the faith, and the infants of "one
or both Christian parents.
m Acts 8. 12 ; n Acts 2. 39 : 1 Cor. T. 14.
A SHORT CATECHISME. 81
Q. What is the Lord's Supper ?
A. A sacrament of our ^continuance and growth in Christ. —
H Cor. 10. 16.
Q. Who is the author of this sacrament ?
A. The ^Lord Jesus in the same night that he was betrayed.
—^\ Cor. 11. 23, 24.
Q. What is the outicard signe ?
A. Bread ^ and wine, with the actions pertaining to them, as
breaking, giving, receiving, eating, and drinking. — ^Matt. 26.
27, 28.
Q. What is the inward grace ?
A. Christ^ with all the benefits of his death and passion. —
n Cor. 11. 24.
Q. What is the duty of the minister in the administration of this
sacrament ?
A. To consecrate® it by declaring the institution thereof and
prayer joyned with thanksgiving ; as also to breake the bread
and afterwards to deliver the bread and wine to the people.
el Cor. 11. 23, 24; Matt. 26. 26, 27, 28; Mark 14. 22; Luke 22. 19.
Q. What is hereby signified ?
A. The action of God the Father offering Christ to all, and
bestowing him ^effectually upon the worthy receiver. — ^1 Cor.
10. 16.
Q. What is the dutie of the receivers ?
A. To receive^ the bread and wine delivered, and to eat and
drink thereof
g Matt. 26. 26, 27 ; 1 Cor. 11. 23, 24.
Q. What is signified hereby ?
A. Our ^receiving and feeding upon Christ by faith. — ^1 Cor.
10. 16.
Q. Is it sufficient to receive the sacrament once ?
A. No; ^but we must receive it often. — ^Acts 2. 42, and 20. 7.
Q. For what end and use ought we to receive this sacrament ?
A. To ^confirme our faith, communion with Christ, and all
saving graces in us, to keepe^ in remembrance the Lord's death
untill he come againe, and to testify °^our love one to another.
fc 1 Cor. 10. 16 ; n Cor. 11. 24, 26 ; m 1 Cor. 12. 13.
F
82 A SHORT CATECHISME.
Q. What is the danger of unworthy receiving ?
A. Unworthy receivers are guilty of the body and blood of
the Lord, and do eat and drinke judgement to themselves. —
1 Cor. 11. 27, 29.
Q. JVho are to receive this sacrament ?
A. Such as know their ^misery by sin, the remedy thereof
in Christ, and the ^doctrine of the sacrament, withall earnestly
P longing to be satisfied with the bread of life.
71 Matt. 11. 28 ; oExod. 12. 26, 27 ; pRev. 22. 17.
Q. What else is required in them that come to this table ?
A. A renewed ^hatred of all sinne, an hearty endeavour to
overcome naturall passions, an utter and well-advised forsaking
of ^grosse sins, willingnesse^ to be strengthened in faith, and a
^longing desire for the good of our brethren.
5 Luke 3. 12, 13; Matt. 18. 3; rLuke 14. 28, 29, etc. ; sMatt. 5. 6; iMark 11. 25;
Matt. 5. 23, 24.
Q. What if a man finde himselfe weake in faith and full of
doubting .?
A. He must bewaile "his unbeleefe, pray for faith, seeke to
have his doubts resolved, and so receive to be further
^strengthened.
tt.Mark 9. 24 ; iw Judg. 6. 36, 37 ; Exod. 12. 1, 2, 3, 4.
Q. How ought a mans heart to be affected in receiving the sacrament?
A. With ^reverence, joy, and ^comfort, meditating ^on the
outward signes and what they signifie, the dainties prepared,
and love of him that prepared them, our communion with Christ,
his graces and faithfuU people whereby the heart is prepared to
thanksgiving.
g Exod. 3. 5 ; Gen. 28. 17 ; h Deut. 16. 15 ; i 1 Cor. 11. 25 ; 1 Kings 8. m.
Q. What must we do after we have received ?
A. We must endeavour to find an encrease of ^ faith, love,
and all saving graces, abounding more and more in well-doing.
kProv. 4. 18; Ezek, 47. 12.
Q. What order hath the Lord left in his Church to heepe his ordi-
nances from contempt ?
A. The unruly should be ^admonished, the obstinate ™ ex-
communicated, and the penitent after their fall restored and
"comforted.
1 1 Tlies. 5. 14 ; ml Cor. 5. 5 ; 7t 2 Cor. 2. 6, 7.
A SHORT CATECHISME. 83
Q. Besides the forenamed meanes, are tliere not some other profit-
able for the increase of faith ?
A. Yes ; ^reading or hearing the Scriptures read in Ppublique
and in *3 private, '"meditation and ^conference.
oRev. 1. 3 ; ^ Acts 13. 15 ; g Acts 8. 30 ; r Luke 2. 51 ; sHeb. 3. 13 ; John 4. 52.
Q. Hitherto of the ordinary meanes whereby faith is encreased ;
Be there not also some extraordinary meanes ?
A. Yes ; and those be holy ^fasting, holy ^feasting and
religious ''vowes.
a Luke 5. 85 ; 6 Esther 9. 17 c Psal. 50. 14.
Q. What is an holy fast ?
A. A religious ^abstinence from all the labours^ of our calling
and comforts^ of life, so farre as comelinesse and necessity will
permit, that wee might bee more seriously ^humbled before God,
and more fervent in prayer.
d Esther 4. 16 ; e Lev. 23. 28 ; /Exod. 35. 5 ; 3 Dan. 9. 9, 11 ; Levit. 23. 27.
Q. When ought we to fast .?
A. When we feele or ^fear some grievous calamity upon us
or hanging over our heads, want some speciall blessing, are
pressed with some speciall sinne, or goe about some hveighty
matter.
h Esther 4. 16 ; Ezra 8. 21 ; i Acts 13. 2.
Q. What is an holy feast ?
A. An extraordinary ^thanksgiving for some notable de-
liverance out of some desperate danger, testified with feasting
before God, with joy and gladnesse, sending presents to our
friends and ^portions to the needy.
kl Chr. 16. 8, and 29. 10, 11 ; ZNeh. 8. 10 ; Esther 9. 22.
Q. What is a religious vow ?
A. A solemne ™ promise unto God made by a fit person of
some lawful thing which is in his choice, to testifie his ^love
and th^kfulnesse.
mDeut. 23. 21, 22 ; 71 Psal. 116. 12.
Q. Can faith being wrought and confirmed in us be fruitlesse and
unprofitable ?
A.^o; for it worketh by °love. — °Gal. 5. 6.
Q. What is the principall work of faith ?
A. It purifieth the heart. — Acts 15. 9.
f
84 A SHORT CATECHISME.
Q. What foUoweth thereupon ?
A. A fighting and combating against sinne and corruption. —
Gal. 5. 17.
Q. What else ?
A. Restraining P of all evill in affection and of grosse ^ sinne
in life and conversation.
p Acts 2. 38 ; g Acts 19. 18, 19.
Q. Wliat is a third thing that foUoweth hence ?
A. Love^ and delight in that which is good, joyned with a
sincere desire, purpose, and endeavour, ^ daily to amend whatso-
ever is amisse, and to lead a life* according to the law of God.
rPsal. 119. 97 ; sPhil. 3. 13, 14 ; Acts 11. 23 ; fPsal. 119. 6.
Q. Wherein is the summe of the law contained ?
A. In the ten Commandments. — Deut. 10. 4.
Q. How are they divided ?
A. Into two Tables.— Deut. 5. 22, and 10. 1, 2.
Q. Which are the commandments of the first table ?
A. The four first, and they teach the duty which we owe
unto God immediately.
Q. Which are the commandments of the second table ?
A. The six last, which instruct us in our duty towards our
neighbour.
Q. Which is the first Commandment ?
^. I am the Lord thy God, etc.. Thou shalt have, etc.
Q. Which is the generall duty required in this commandment ?
A. That in minde, will, affections, and the effects of these, we
take the true God in Christ to be our God.
Q. What is the generall sin here forbidden ?
A. All failing to give God that foresaid honour which is due
unto him, or else in whole or in part giving it to any other.
Q. What is the second Commandment ?
A. Thou shalt not make thyself, etc.
Q. What is the generall duty ivhich this commandement requireth ?
A. That we doe worship the true God purely according to
his will.
A SHORT CATECHISME. 85
Q. What is the generall sin forbidden ?
A. All omission of God's true worship when it is required,
and all false worship either invented by others or taken up of
our own heads.
Q. Which is the third Commandement ?
A. Thou shalt not take the name, etc.
Q. WJiat is the generall duty required in this commandement ?
A. That we should use the titles, properties, workes, and
ordinances of the Lord, with knowledge, faith, reverence, joy,
and sincerity in thought, word, and conversation.
Q. What is the generall sin forbidden ?
A. Omitting the duty here required, using the Lord's name
when we ought not, or otherwise than we should.
Q. When is the name of God taken otherwise then it should ?
A, When it is used ignorantly, superstitiously, without faith,
rashly, not to a right end, hypocritically, falsly against con-
science, and when men name themselves Christians but live
scandalously.
Q. Which is the fourth Commandement ?
A. Eemember the Sabbath day, etc.
Q. What is the genercdl duty here required ?
A, That the whole Sabbath or Lord's day be set apart from
all common uses as holy to the Lord both publikely and
privately in the practice of the duties of necessity, holinesse,
and mercy.
Q, What is the genercdl sip. here forbidden ?
A. All neglecting of the duties of that time, or prophaning of
that day by needlesse works, words, or thoughts about our
callings or recreation.
Q. Which day is to be set apart as holy to the Lord ?
A. It is morall and perpetuall to keepe one day in seven as
holy : from the creation to the resurrection of Christ the
seventh day was instituted; after Christ his resurrection the
first day of the weeke was ordained, and is to be kept for ever.
86 A SHORT CATECHISME.
Q. What is the fifth Commandement ?
A. Honour thy father and thy mother, etc.
Q. Who are to be understood by father and mother ?
A. Not onely naturall parents, but also all superiours in office,
age, and gifts.
Q. TFhat is it to, honour ?
A. To acknowledge the excellency that is in men by vertue
of their place, and to carry ourselves accordingly towards them.
Q. Are onely the duties of inferiors here intended 2
A. No ; but of superiours and equals also.
Q. What then is the maine duty of this Commandement ?
A. That we carefully observe that order which God hath
appointed amongst men, and doe the duties which wee owe
unto them in respect of their j)laces and degrees.
Q. What is the duty of inferiours ?
A. They must be subject, reverent, and thankfull to their
superiours, bearing with their wants and covering them in love.
Q. What is the duty of superiours ?
A. To carry themselves gravely, meekly, and after a seemly
manner towards their inferiours.
Q. What is the duty of equals ?
A. To regard the dignitie and worth each of other, modestly
to beare themselves one toward the other, and in giving honour
to go one before another.
Q. Which is the sixth Commandement ? .
A. Thou shalt doe no murther.
Q. What is the generall duty of this commandement ?
A. That by all meanes lawfull we desire and study to preserve
our own person and the person of our neighbour.
Q. What is the generall sin herein forbidden ?
A. All neglect of our own or our neighbour's preservation, or
desire of our own or their hurt, conceived in heart, or declared
in word, gesture, or deed.
A SHORT CATECHISME. 87
Q. Which is the seventh Commandment ?
A. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Q. JFhat is the generall dutie of the Commandement ?
A, That we should keep ourselves pure in soule and body
both towards ourselves and others.
Q. What is the generall sin here forbidden ?
A. All uncleannesse of heart, speech, gesture, or action,
together with all the causes, occasions, and signes thereof.
Q. Which is the eighth Commandement ? ,
A. Thou shalt not steal.
Q. What is the generall duty of this Commandement ?
A. That by all good meanes we further the outward estate of
ourselves and of our neighbours.
Q. What is the generall sin forUdden ?
A. All neglect to further our owne or our neighbour's wealth,
all impeachment or hinderance thereof, and all increase thereof
by unjust and indirect dealing.
Q. Which is the ninth Commandement ?
A. Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbour.
Q. What is the generall duty here required ?
A. That by all meanes we seek to maintain our owne and
our neighbour's good name according to truth and a good con-
science.
Q. What is the generall sinne forbidden ?
A. All failing to procure, defend, and further our owne and
our neighbour's credit, all unjust defence, wrongful suspition
and accusation of ourselves and others.
Q. What is the tenth Commandement ?
A. Thou shalt not covet, etc.
Q. What is the generall duty commanded ?
A. That we be truly contented with our own outward condi-
tion, and heartily desire the good of our neighbour in all things
belonging unto him great and small.
88 A SHORT CATECHISME.
Q. JFhat is the generall sin forbidden ?
A. All thoughts of minde, wishes, and desires of heart, and
delightfull remembrances of evill against contentednesse.
Q. Is any man able to heepe this Law ?
A. Not perfectly, for the ^godly often fall, the most holy
^faile alwayes in their best duties, but the child of God ought,*^
may, and usually^ doth walk according to the law sincerely.
a Jam. 3. 2 ; & Exod. 28. 36, 37, 38 ; c 1 John 2. 14 ; John 14. 15, 23 ; c? 1 Kings 15. 5.
Q. Should not a Christian omit doing of good altogether^ seeing he
cannot do it in the measure that God requireth ?
A. No ; but with diligence and ®singlenesse of heart strive
against corruption, look for ^the assistance of God's Spirit, and
labour to^ grow in grace.
«2 Cor. 7. 1 ; /2 Chron. 16. 9 ; Phil. 4. 13 ; gr 1 Pet. 2. 2, and 2 Pet. 3. 18.
Q. What meanes shoidd a man use to grow in grace 2
A. He must throughly ^examine his wayes, judge ^ himselfe,
watch ^ over his heart at all times, in all places, occasions, and
conditions, redeeming the Hime to store his heart with good
and preserve"^ his faith.
7i Hag. 1. 5, 7 ; n Cor. 11. 31 ; A: 2 Tim. 4. 5 ; Z Eph. 5. 16 ; m Heb. 10. 35, 36, 38.
Q. What else ?
A. He must take unto" him the whole armour of God, and
with care, uprightnes, and constancy use the meanes of ° grace
before prescribed in one estate p as well as in another.
»iEph. 6. 14 ; oProv. 2. 3, 4; Col. 4. 2 ; p Job 27. 10.
Q. What priviledges doth God afford in this life unto his children
who labour according to his will to increase in grace ?
A. They may be assured^ of his favour and fatherly '"care
over them, the ^direction of his Spirit, their ^growth in grace
and ^^perseverance to the end.
q 1 John 3. 1, 13 ; John 1. 12 ; r\ Tim. 4. 10 ; Matt. 10. 30 ; s Psalm 143. 10 ; t Col. 1.
9, 10, 11 ; u Phil. 1. 6.
Q. What other jmvileges doth God afford unto them ?
A. They are "kept from, comforted^ in, and delivered^ out
of many troubles, taught to use^ all estates aright, ^preserved
from foule offences, enabled to ^rise againe if they fall, instructed
to live ^godly, and have possession ^of the word.
uPsal. 32. 10; -wActs 16. 25; a;Prov. 11. 8; 2/ Lam. 3. 27; Phil. 4. 12; Luke 1. 6;
gPsal. 37. 23, 24 ; a Eph. 2. 10 ; iLuke 1. 15.
A SHORT CATECHISME. 89
Q. Do all the godly or any at all times enjoy all these priviledges?
A. No ; some are ignorant of them, not believing, or at least
very faintly, that there be any such ; others are carelesse who
prize them not, and so take not j^ains for these things as they
ought.
Q. What other hindrances do deprive Christians of the enjoying of
these priviledges ?
A. Inordinate ^j^assions, as fear, anger, selfe-love, pride, love
of pleasures, cares of the world, earthly incumbrances, and in-
constancy in good duties ; temptations also to distrust do keep
under many. — ^Jam. 4. 1,2.
Q. How should a man hridle and reforme these unruly passions ?
A. Let him highly esteem a Christian life, pray earnestly, set
himselfe most against the infirmities that be strongest in him,
shun the occasion of sinne, hide the ™commandements in his
heart, and ^ apply the death of Christ for the killing of cor-
ruption.
mPsal. 119. 11; wlJoh. 5. 4.
Q. How may a man overcome his temptations to distrust ?
A. He must not give credit to° Satan's suggestions against
God's truth, but consider of God's Ppower, know-
ledge, P righteousnesse, and holi-
nesse.
oCol. 3. 10. p Eph. 4. 24
35 A. Mankinde is now natur-
ally in a very *^i miserable condi-
tion.
q Eph. 2. 1, 2, 3.
36 A. Man's misery is that
they are now ^all sinners, and
subject to s punishment for sin,
and that is ^my condition as well
as others.
r Rom. 3. 9 to 19. s Rom. 5. 12. t Ei)h.
2. 3, 4.
.06 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINE THE CREED.
And Is that your condition as
well as others ? y^s.
Or Are any free from punish-
ment, you or others ? -A'o.
Or Out of danger of it ? Xo.
37 Q. What is sin ?
Is it onely a transgression of
God's Law in deeds ? N'o.
Or Any transgression, be it in
words or thoughts? Yes.
38 Q. Hoiv came mankinde to he
miserable ?
Was it without their owne
fault ? No.
Or Because they all sinned
with our first parents, Adam
and Eve, in eating the forbidden
fruit ? Yes.
And Did you sin among them ? Yes,
39 Q. Why should children he
charged ivith their parents' faults ?
Is it not unjust ? ^^o.
Or Doe men confesse it just,
sometimes doing so to bastards
and traitors' children ? }"(^,s-.
40 Q. How farre are all man-
hinde corrupted with sin ?
Are they onely guilty of that
first sin of Adam ? ]Sfo.
Or Are they all in themselves
corrupted with sin ? Yes.
And are you so too ? Yes.
And That altogether in every
part both of soule and body? Yes.
Or Onely in some part ? No.
41 Q. What do you meane by
saying all men are altogether cor-
rupted with sin ?
Are they inclined to all sins ? Yes.
Or Onely to some ? No.
And are they all untoward to
any good ? . Yes.
Or Inclined at least to some
good ? Xo.
37 A. Sinne is any « trans-
gression of God's Law, bee it but
in X words or y thoughts.
1(1 John 3. 4. a; Matt. 12. 36, 37.
y Jer. 4. 14.
38 A. Mankinde became
miserable by sinning zall with
our first parents, Adam and Eve,
in "^eating the forbidden fruit,
and I sinned among them.
z Rom. 5. 12 and 18. * Gen. 3. 6.
39 A. Men confess it just to
charge children sometimes with
the parents' faults, doing so to
bastards and traitors' children.
40 A. All mankinde are ^ alto-
gether corrupted with sin, and
that in every part both of soule
and body ; and ^so am I.
a Gen. 6. 5 ; Rom. 3. 9 to 19. l Rom.
7. 24 ; Prov. 27. 19.
41 A. ^All men are inclined
to all sins, and ^.
Or Is any of them, being poor
or the like, denied fellowship
with Christ in his grace in any
respect ? No.
Or Denied a right to any good
their fellow members might do
for them ? No.
78 A. All true believers and
members of the Church enjoy
together a * communion of saints,
that is a fellowship with x Christ
and yone with another.
* 1 John 1. 3, 7. X 1 Cor. 1. 9. y John
17. 11.
I
79 Q. ^yhat speciall benefit hath
every true believer from, Christ in
this life?
Have they not forgiveness of
sins ? _ Yes.
Or Are they not forgiven till
after this life ? Yes.
And so any of them die with-
out forgiveuesse ? No.
79 A. zEvery true believer
hath from Christ in this life for-
givenesse of sins.
2 Acts 10. 43 ; 1 John 2. 12 ; Acts 5. 31.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINE THE CREED. 1 1
80 Q. What do you meane hyfor-
(jivenesse of sins ?
Is it not that God requireth not
of us ourselves to satisfie for our
sins because Christ hath done that
ah-eady ?
Or Must wCj notwithstanding
our pardon, make God satisfaction
by doiag somewhat ourselves in
this world ?
Or By suffering in this life ?
Or Afterward ?
Fes.
No.
No.
No.
SO A. Forgivenesse of sins, is
^ God's not requiring of us our-
selves to satisfie for our sinnes,
because Christ hath done that
already.
a Rom. 3. 24, 25, 26.
81 Q. But why then are the faith-
full afflicted in this life ?
Is it not to make at least part
of the satisfaction to God for their
sins ? No.
Or Is it not a wrong that they
should be afJiicted when Christ
hath made satisfaction for their
sins ? No.
Or Is it onely fatherly correc-
tion for their amendment and
triall of 1 God's gi-ace in them,
and to make them like Christ ? Yes.
82 Q. But tvhat say you to death
which the faithfuU endure as well
as others ?
Is not that at least laid on
them to satisfie God in part for
their sins ?
Or Is death itselfe a temporall
chastisement, at the worst, to the
faithf all ?
And Withall a passage to a
better condition?
83 Q. What benefit or better con-
dition can there he to the body after
death ?
Shall there be to every faithf nil
soule, a resurrection of the body
from death ? Yes.
Or Shall not the bodies (even
of the faithfuU) remain for ever
No.
S\ A. The afflictions that the
faithfuU endure in this life are
onely ^ fatherly corrections for
their amendment and ^ triall of
God's grace in them, and to make
them ^like Christ.
&Hel). 12. 6, 10, 11. cJam. 1. 2, 3, 4.
d Rom. 8. 29 : John 15. IS, 20.
82 A. e Death itself to the
faithful! is but a temporall chas-
tisement at the worst, and with
all a passage to a better condi-
tion.
e 1 Cor. 15. 54, 55.
83 ^. There shall be to every
faithfuU soul a ^ resurrection of
the body from death.
/ 1 Cor. 15. 42, 44 ; 1 Cor. 6. 4.
his, Ed. 1G40.
118 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO EXPLAINE THE CREED.
S4:Q. What bodies shall he raised 84^. The ^very same body
againe ? shall be raised again that died ;
Shall they be the very same but the bodies of the faithful!
bodies that died ? Yea. shall now be made strong and
Or Others like them, new ere- ^ glorious,
ated and joined to the soules ? No. g\ q^^^ 15. 42^ 43^ 44. /iPhii. 3. 21.
And Shall the bodies of the
faithfull be now made strong and
glorious ? Yes.
Or Be raised weak and imper-
fect as they were before ? No.
r
!
85 Q. What sliall become of the
bodies of the vjicked at the last day ?
Shall they be raised also ?
Or Shall they continue in the
grave still ?
And shall they be raised in any
honour or for their good ?
Or That being condemned, both
body and soule may be cast into
hell fire for ever ?
85 A. The bodies of the i wick-
ed shall be raised also at the last
Yes. day, that being condemned both
body and soule may be cast into
No. k liell fire for ever.
No.
Yes.
86 Q. What benefit shall be to the
faithfull after the generall resurrec-
tion ?
Shall they die any more ? No.
Or Enjoy life everlasting ?
And Shall they live uj)on earth
any more ?
Or Endure any more misery,
pain, or sorrow ?
Or Enjoy all happinesse and
glory with Christ in heaven ?
Yes.
No.
No.
% John 5. 29. fc Matt. 25. 41 and 46.
86-4. After the generall resur-
rection the faithfull shall ^die no
more, but enjoy ™life everlasting,
and ^ all happiness and glory
^with Christ in P heaven.
ILnke 20. 35, 36. m Matt. 25. 46.
nEph. 1. IS. oJohn 17. 24. pi Pet.
1. 4.
CATECHISME,
COMPOSED ACCORDING TO THE ORDER OF
THE CATECHISME IN
THE COMMON PRAYER
BOOKE.
CONTAINING
A BRIEFE EXPOSITION OF
I. THE CREED.
11. THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
III. THE LORD'S PRAYER.
IV. THE SACRAMENTS.
By M. N., B.D., P.P.
THE SECOND EDITION.
LONDON :
Printed by R. Y. iox J. Boler, and are to be sold by
W. Russell, Book-seller in Plimmouth.
1631.
[Bodley Press-mark : S^. P. 270. Th.J
THE SECOND MAINE PART.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
c Jam. 2. 18.
/Mat. 3. S.
g Heb. 5. 9 ;
Rom. C. 17.
h Act. 26. 20.
i 2 Cor. 7. 10.
I- Psal. 51. 4.
I Heb. 12. 4.
i/i Eph. 4. 27
Q. Hoio may a man coma to he assured of his interest
in this blessed estate and condition ?
A. If he can ®approue the truth and soundnesse
of his faith by the fruits of it.
Q. What are those fruits of faith ly which the truth
and soundnesse of it may cqjpeare ?
A. Chiefly ^repentance and ^new obedience.
Q. What is repentance ?
A. ^A turning from sin to God.
Q. Whence doth this arise ?
A. From ^godly sorrow.
Q. What is this godly sorrow ?
A. It is a sorrow for sin, whereby the heart of
a man is deepely pierced with griefe and remorse,
in this respect chiefly, that he hath by his sins
J^offended God.
Q. What followeth hereupon ?
A. A continual ^striuing against all sin, and
"auoyding all occasions and tentations that lead
thereunto : and this is euer seconded with an
endeuour of new obedience.
Q. What is this neiu oledience ?
A. A conscionable performance of all such duties
as God hath enioyned. And this is the third thing
122
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
Isa. 8. 20.
X) Deu. 5. 22.
1. Com.
a Mat. 4. 10.
/* Deu. 4. 39.
Deut. 10. 20.
fZPsa. 62. 1.
e Deut. 6. 5.
/IsayS. 13.
that my Godfathers and Godmothers vndertooke for
mee, or in my name.
Q. Whence haue we the knowledge of these duties
ivhich we are to performe 1
A. Out of the «law of God.
Q. What is this law of God ?
A. It is the perfect rule of all righteousnesse,
contained briefly in the Decalogue, or ten Com-
man dements.
Q. How are the ten Commandements diuided ?
A. Into Ptwo Tables.
Q. Which are the Commandements contained in the
first Table ?
A. The foure first, which teach vs our duty to
God immediately,
Q. Which is the first Commandemsnt ?
A. Thou shalt haue no other gods but mee.
Q. What doth this Commandement require of vs ?
A. That we take the true God ^onely for our
God.
Q. How is this done ?
A. By ^knowing and acknowledging him in our
iudgements to bee God alone, and entirely ^cleaning
to him in our affections.
Q. Which are those affections by which we are to
deaue vnto God especially ?
A. They are specially three. 1. *^ Faith and
affiance in him as our onely stay. 2. ®Loue vnto
him as our chiefest good. 3. ^ Feare of him as the
greatest and most glorious obiect.
Q. What are the euils contrary hereunto ?
. A. They are either in the iudgment or in the
affections.
THE TEN COMMANDEI\IENTS.
123
(/Psal. 14. 1.
h 2 The. 1. S.
i Hos. 14. 3.
fc Jeremy 5. 22,
23.
iJer. 17. 5.
2. Com,
mJoh. 4. 24.
wDeute. 12.
30. 32.
Act. 2. 41.
p Joel 2. 15.
q Est. 2. 17.
«Tit. 1. 5.
61 Tim. 5. 17,
18.
2 Chr. 31. 4.
Q. TFhat are the euils in the iudgement against this
Commanclement ?
A. Either ^not acknowledging any God at all,
which is Atheisme, or ^not knowing the true God
aright, which is grosse ignorance, or ^acknowledging
any other to bee God besides him, which is Idol-
atrie.
Q. What are the euils in the affections ?
A. Any ^failing in the affections before mentioned
to cleaue vnto the true God, or leaning therein to
any other.
Q. Which is the second Commandement ?
A. Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen
image, etc.
Q. What is enioyned therein ?
A. That we worship God ^^spiritually and purely,
accordinoj to his owne "direction in his word.
Q. What are the ehiefe parts of God's worship which
his word prescribes ?
A. They are eyther ordinary or extraordinarie.
Q. Which are the ordinarie ?
A. ^Preaching and hearing of the word, adminis-
tring and receiuing of the Sacraments, and Prayer.
Q. Which are the extraordinarie ?
A. PSolemne fasting, and ^holy feasting, to ex-
presse either our humiliation, or our thankefulnesse,
according to our speciall and extraordinary occa-
sions.
Q. Are there any other duties required in this Com-
mandement as helpes or meanes to further God's worship?
A. Yes, it is requisite to this end, that *faithfull
and able ministers bee ordained and set ouer euery
Congregation, and that sufficient ^maintenance, and
all due encouragement bee allotted and afforded to
them.
124
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
cNum. 15. 39.
(Jlsa. 64. 7.
cDeut. 4. 15-
IS.
*Act. 17. 29.
/Isa. 29. 13.
(/Pro. 28. 9.
?iEzek. 33. 31.
3 Com.
iDeut. 28. 58.
;;;1 Cor. 10. 31.
I Ps. 139. 12.
mPsa. 119.46.
%Mat. 5. 16.
oPs. 10. 13.
Mai. 2. 17.
j^Joh. 6. 60.
QMal. 1. 12.
r2Ki. 6. 33.
Q. What are the euils contrary hereunto 1
A. The ^deuising or exercising of any false wor-
ship, contrary to, or besides the word of God, or
any "^neglect of that true Avorship which he requireth.
Q. Which are the chief e kinds of false worship ivhich
God's ivord condemneth ?
A. The worshipping of God by ^images, either
represented to the eye, or * conceiued in the mind :
and ^obtruding vpon God any humane inuentions
as parts of his worship.
Q. Hoio many ivayes may God's true worship he
neglected ?
A. Either by ^omitting altogether the dueties
thereunto required, or by performing them ^hypocri-
tically or carelesly.
Q. Which is the third Commandement ?
A. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy
God in vaine, etc.
Q. What is the maine thing that is here required ?
A. That we vse the name of God, that is, his
titles, properties, workes, and ordinances, with due
^reuerence, so as may tend most to his ^glory in
Hhought, ™word, and ^^deede.
Q. What are the sinnes forbidden hereby ?
A. They are either of commission or of omission.
Q. Which are the chiefe sins of commission against
this Commandement ?
A. They are eyther in thought, in word, or in
action.
Q. How may a man offend in thought here ?
A. By ^thinking dishonourably of God, or any
of his attributes, or of any ^^loctrine in his word, or
of any thing ^pertaining to his seruice ; as also by
^repining at any thing he doth in the course of his
prouidence.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
125
tJer. 23. 10.
ulna.. 22. 13.
Jer. 23. 33.
xDeut. IS. 10,
11.
yRom. 2. 23.
a Mat. 10. 33,
and 13. 21.
6 Jer. 9. 3.
4 Com.
cReu. 1. 10.
cZAct. 13. 14,
15, and 15. 21.
eAct. 16. IS.
/Act. 20. r.
gPsal. 92.
/i2Chro. 30.1S
Q. How may one offend in ivord ?
A. By the ^irreuerent mentioning of liis titles, in
foolish admirations, idle wishes, or imprecations, and
aboue all in blasphemous * swearing; as also by
"iesting with his word or workes, or any of his
ordinances.
Q, How in action ?
A. By abusing the titles of God, or any part of
his word, to ^charmes, or sorcerie ; and generally by
^'''liuing offensiuely to his dishonour.
Q. How is this Commandement violated hj way of
ommission ?
A. By ^shrinking from the profession of the
truth in case of perill, or ^failing to speake or doe
any thing tending to God's glory.
Q. Which is the fourth Commandement ?
A. Eemember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it, etc.
Q. What doth this teach vs ?
A. To set apart and employ one day of seuen, and
now specially the ^Lord's day in the dueties of
religion and w^orkes of mercie.
Q. What are the duties of religion wherein we are to
spend the Lord's day ?
A. They are partly publicke to be vsed in the
church, and partly priuate to be vsed either with
our families or by our selues.
Q. Which are the puhlicke dueties to he vsed in the
Church ?
A. ^Hearing of the word read, and preached,
Spraying with the congregation, and ^receiuing of
the Sacrament in the times appointed thereunto.
Q. Which are the priuate ?
A. ^Conferring and meditating of the word and
works of God, specially Spraying by our selues and
with our families, before and after the publicke
126
i Act. S. 30.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
tMar. 3. 4.
1 1 Cor. IG. 2.
7nMat. 12. 1,
7, 11.
jiMat. 12. 5.
«Neh. 13. 15.
Isay 58. 13.
1
fc Deu. 5. 13.
exercises for a blessing thereon, and ^examining our
seines, and those that are vnder vs, how we haue
profited thereby.
Q. What are the works of mercy which wee are to
jperforme on that day ?
A. '^Visiting the sicke, comforting the afflicted,
'collections for the poore, and such like.
Q. May no other tvorke he clone on the Lord's day ?
A. No, vnlesse they be workes of necessity.
Q. What he those workes of necessity ?
A. Such as tend necessarily to the "^preseruation
of life, health, or goods, which otherwise would
perish, or bee in danger; or to the '^performance of
God's seruice, which otherwise must bee omitted.
Q. How many waies is this Commandement violated ?
A. Specially two ; either by omitting of any of
the forementioned dueties, by which the Sabbath is
to bee sanctified, or by doing any worke whereby
it may bee profaned.
Q. What are those workes hy ivhich the Sahhath may
he profaned ?
A. Not onely all sinfull workes which are vnlaw-
full at any time, but ^all workes of our callings, and
bodily recreations, which are lawfull to be vsed at
other times : nay, not onely so, but all talking of
worldly aff'aires, and so much as thinking of our own
businesses, whereby our minds may be drawn away
from God's seruice.
Q. What meanes hath God jprescrihed for auoiding of,
these distractions ?
A. Remembring the Sabbath before hand, that
we may fit our selues for it, and dispose of our
'^worldly businesse so, as that we be not distracted
in it.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
12'
5. Com.
c 2 King 5. 13.
dJosh. 7. 19.
e 2 Iflng 6. 21.
/I Tim. 5.1,2.
q Gen. 45. 8 ;
Job 31. 18.
;i Leu. 19. 3,32.
i Col. 3. 20, 22.
k 1 Tim. 5. 4.
J Tit. 2. 2, 4,
15.
m Col. 3. 21,
and 4. 1.
n Ro. 12. 10.
1 Pet. 2. 17,
and 5. 5.
Q. What Commandements doth the second Table
containe ?
A. The sixe last wliich instruct vs in our dueties
to our selues and other men.
Q. Which is the first of these ?
A. The fift Commandement, Honour thy Father
and thy Mother, that thy daies may be long, etc.
Q. What doth this Commandement require of vs ?
A. That wee carry our selues as becomes vs in
our places, and giue vnto others that honour and
respect that is due vnto tliem, in regard of their
places, and degrees, as they are our superiors, in-
feriors, or equals.
Q. Whom are icee to account our superiours ?
A. Not onely our naturall parents, but all gene-
rally, that haue eyther authoritie ouer vs, as
^Masters, ^Magistrates, ® Ministers ; or pre-eminence
aboue vs in regard ^of age, gifts, or ^benefits done
by them vnto vs.
Q. What is the dutie that ivee oive vnto such .?
A, vTo ^reuerence their persons, to ^obey their
lawfull commands, so farre as their authoritie ex-
tendeth, and ^to bee thankefull vnto them for any
good we receiue from them.
Q. What is the dutie that sfuperiours are to returne
backe againe to their infer iours ?
A. To carry themselues ^grauely, and in a semely
manner before them, and withall ^meekely and
louingly towards them.
Q. What is the duety of equals to each other ?
A. To carry themselues '^modestly and louingly
towards one another, mtli due <^ respect to the
worth and dignitie of each other.
Q. What are the euils forbidden in this Commandement ?
A. The neglect or omission of any of the dueties
128
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
a Pro. 30. 17
Jude 8.
h Rom. 1. 30.
c 1 Ti. 5. 8.
dlSa. 3. 13.
€ Eze. 34. 4.
/Gal. 5. 26.
9 Mat. 23. 6.
6. Com.
Tr. Gen. 9. 5, 6.
i 1 Ti. 5. 23.
A: Joh. 4. 1, 3.
1 1 Pet. 2. 2.
m 1 Thes. 5. 2
n Phil. 2. 13.
before mentioned ; or the doing of any thing con-
trary thereunto ; which may be diners wayes, ac-
cording to the difference of the persons.
Q. TFliat are the sins incident to inferiours specially ?
A. ^Despising, ^disobeying, or ^shewing them-
selues vnkinde and vnthankefull to their superiours.
Q. What are the vsuall sinnes of superiours ?
A. ^ Light and vnseemely carriage ; together with
all ®abuse of their authoritie or pre-eminence, to the
grieuing or disheartening of those that are vnder
them.
Q. What are the sins of equals ?
A. ^Enuying one another, and ^aduancing them-
selues one aboue another.
Q. Which is the next Commandement ?
A. The sixt. Thou shalt not kill.
Q. What is the nmine scope of this Commandement 7
A. That the ^person, and specially the life of
man bee not any way impeached by man, but pre-
serued.
Q. What is the duty that is herein required of vs 2
A. That wee desire, and doe what in vs lyeth to
further the preseruation of life, and that both bodily
and spirituall, in ourselues and others.
Q. What must wee doe to further the preseruation of
our own bodily Hues ?
A. We must vse ^ sober and wholsom diet, with
the helpe of Physicke when need requires, ^auoiding
all vnnecessarie dangers, etc.
Q. What are we to doe for the preseruing of the life
of mir soides ?
A. We are diligently to ^attend vpon the meanes
of grace, carefully ™auoiding all occasions of sin,
and so ^ worke out our own saluation with feare and
trembling.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
129
»
oPro. 24. 11.
p Job 31. 19.
q 1 Thes. 5, 14.
z Jam. 3. 13, li
a Mat. 5. 16.
b Heb. 3. 13,
and 10. 24.
1 Thes. 5. 14.
^
d Pro, 8. 36.
c Pro. 6. 32.
/Num. 15. 30.
g Act. 13. 46.
h 2 The. 1. 8.
i 2 Pet. 3. 16.
k I Sam. 31. 4.
i 1 Kin. 2. 23.
m Pro. 14. 30.
71 1 Cor. 8. 10,
11.
ol Kin. 12. 28,
30.
p Hos. 4. 6.
5 2 Cor. 1. 17.
Q. JFIiat must wee doe for the preseruation of our
neighbour's bodily life ?
A. Wee must ^rescue him if wee can from any
dangers, Prelieue him in his necessities, •ipitie and
comfort him what we can in his distresses, and
^Carrie our selues meekely, louingly, and peaceably
towards him.
Q. What must wee doe for him in regard of the life
of his soule ?
A. Wee must doe our best to win him to the
loue of the truth, by our good ^example, counsell
and encouragement, seasonably ^admonishing, and
comforting him, as occasion requireth.
Q. JFhat are the euils forbidden hereby ?
A. Any neglect of these dueties,
the doing, intending, or so much as wishing an}'
hurt to the soules or bodies of our selues or others.
together
with
Q. What are the euils sjJecially that fend to the hurt
of our owne soules ?
A. All ^sinne generally, and specially ^grosse
sinnes ^committed with an high hand obstinately,
but aboue all Prelecting, ^disobeying, or any way
^corrupting or peruerting of the word of God.
Q. What are those that tend to the hurt of our bodies ?
A. All manner of '^violence oftered to our selues,
tending to the killing, wounding, or weakning of our
bodies, together with all ^capitall crimes that deserue
death, surfets, "^enuy, or rushing vpon vnnecessarj"
dangers that may procure it.
Q. How may wee doe hurt to our neighbo^ir^s soules 1
A. By "giuing them ill example, ^commanding
or perswading them to any thing vnlawfull, Pwith-
holding from them the word of life, or any way
^corrupting the same.
130
r Gen. 9. 6.
*• Exod. 21. 18.
iZeph. 3. 1, 3.
u Deu. 25. 3.
xPro. VI. IS;
Mat. 5. 22.
7. Com.
y 1 Thes. 4. 3,
4.
a 1 Cor.
9. 27.
b Pro. 13. 20.
c 1 Cor.
39.
d 1 Cor.
7. 9,
7.3,
c 1 Tim.
/Eph. 4
i/Tit. 2.
2. 9.
. 29.
8-5.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
Q. How tve may ivrong them in regard of their bodies ?
A. Not onely by ^killing, ^wounding, or striking
them, but by ^oj^pressing them, vsing "extremitie in
correcting or punishing them, or ^grieuing them any
way by bitter speeches, or any kinde of froward, or
churlish carriage.
Q. But 'what if a man's froward imssions doe not
breake out to the grieuing of others, are they then breaches
of this latv ?
A. Yes, insomuch as they tend and stirre up in
vs euill desires that way.
Q. What folloiveth next ?
A. The seuenth Commandement, Thou shalt not
commit adulterie.
Q. Whereunto tendeth this ?
A, To the repressing of all vncleannesse, and the
preseruation of chastitie and puritie both in body
and minde.
Q. What is required of vs herein ?
A. That wee preserue ^ chastitie both of body and
minde, both in our selues and others, and vse all
good meanes tending thereunto.
Q. What are the spedall meanes of ]preseruing chastity
in our selues ?
A. ^Temperance in diet, with conuenient abstin-
ence at some times, labour in our callings, ^associat-
ing our selues with sober and chaste persons, and
^for them that haue not the gift of continencie, holy
marriage, together with a '^ sober vse thereof.
Q. What meanes must tee vse to preserue it in others ?
A. ^Modest apparell, ^gracious speeches, together
with ^ sober and graue behauiour.
Q. What are the euils contrary hereunto ?
A. Not only the grosse acts of vncleannesse, but
all manner of inordinacie in thought, desire, speech.
i
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
131
or action tending that way, or any thing that is, or
may be a cause, occasion, or signe thereof.
Q. JFhat be those grossed' acts of vndeannesse .?
A. ^Fornication, and ^adiilterie, both which may
be aggrauated by ^incest and ^rape : "H^nlawfull
marriages, intemperate, or "vnseasonable vse of the
mariage bed, and finally all vnnaturall mixture
eyther with the ^same sexe, or with ^a diuerse
kinde.
Q. What are those thoughts, desires, S2)eeches, and
actions tending hereiinto ?
A, All ifilthy imaginations, specially entertained
with delight, ^'vnchaste desires, ^corrupt communica-
tion, * wanton dalliance, and lightnesse in behauiour
generally.
Q. What are the things ivhich are or may proue
causes, occasions, or signes hereof ?
A. "Idlenesse, intemperance in eating or drink-
ing, -"^immodest apparell, ^lasciuious pictures, lewd
spectacles, etc.
Q. Which is the eightJi Commandement 7
A. Thou shalt not steale.
Q. What doth this Commandement ay me at ?
A. The preseruation of men's outward estates.
Q. What is required of vs herein ?
A. That wee doe what in vs lyeth by all good
and lawfull means, to further the wealth or outward
estate of our selues and others.
Q. By what meanes chiefly are ive to further our oxen
outiuard estcde ?
A. By getting honestly, and wisely managing
these outward things, that serue for our mainten-
ance in this life.
132
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
a Gen. 2. 15,
and 3. 19.
Ephes. 4. 18.
6 Pro. 27. 23,
24.
cEccl. 5. 18.
dPsa. 112. 5.
eLeu. 25. 14.
/Psal. 15. 4.
^Pro. 11. 25.
Deut. 15. 7.
7tcap. 22. 1.
iPro. 23. 21.
fcProu. 28. 26,
27.
ZLuke 5. 13.
mActs 19. 15.
wEccl. 4. 8.
Q. ^02^ mmj a man honestly get so much of these
outward things as is conuenient for his maintenance ?
A. By ^making choyce of a lawfull calling,
wherein he may employ himselfe, and labouring
faithfully therein.
Q. Hoiv is hee to manage ivhat hee hath gotten ?
A. By '^keeping it frugally, and '^vsing it charit-
ably^ ^discreetly limitting and ordering his expences,
according to the proportion of his commings in.
Q. What are wee to doe to the furthering of the good
estate of our neighbours ?
A. We are to deale truly and iustly with them in
all ®bargaines and ^contracts, and ^liberally as
occasion requireth in giuing or lending to them,
^ doing the best we can euerie way to helpe them to
that which of right l^elongs vnto them.
Q. What is the euill contrarie hereunto ?
A. Any neglect to further, together with the
doing or endeauouring to doe anie thing that may
hinder or empaire the outward estate of our selues
or others.
Q. How doe men vsually empaire their oivne estates ?
A. By 4dle and inordinate lining, wasting and
consuming their substance, by^heedelesse suretiship,
or Danish expenses ; as also by taking ™vnlawfull
wayes of gayning or "defrauding themselues of the
vse and comfort of that which God hath giuen them.
Q. How doe they hinder or emjmire the outward estates
of others ?
A. By theft.
Q. What is theft?
A. The taking or detayning of that which of
right pertaines to another man, without his consent
and good liking.
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
133
SrlThe. 4. 6.
/lAmo. 8. 4.
iPro. 20. 14.
7:Deut. 25. 13,
14.
Hsa. 1. 23.
mPro. 28. 7.
n2 Thes. 3. 10.
Q. How many tcayes may these bee committed ?
A. Eytlier grossely without any colour, or more
cunningly vnder colour of law.
Q. JFJiat are those grosse kiiules of theft that are
committed icithout any colour of laiv ?
A. They are againe of two sorts ; more open or
more secret.
Q. What is your more open kinde of theft ?
A. That which we commonly call ^robbery, when
things are taken by force or violence, which if it be
by sea it is called piracie ; to which you may referre
P oppression, when rich men with-hold the ^hire of
labourers, or any thing that is due to poore men.
Q. What is that theft which is more secret ?
A. It is that which we know commonly by the
name of theevery, when things are secretly ^pur-
loyned, the owners being ignorant of it ; to which
the ^not restoring of things found, the ^remouing of
bounds or land-markes, and all kinde of ^ false dealing
in matters committed to our trust, are neere akin.
Q. What are those thefts that are committed more
cunningly vnder colour of law ?
A. All manner of ^bribery and extortion, which
is the sale of iustice, or of iniustice ; together with
all ^simonie, which is the sale of things sacred,
which ought to bee freely giuen and dispensed ; and
^vsury, which is the sale of loane, which ought to be
free likewise ; and to this head you may referre all
kinde of ^deceit and iniustice in bargaining, whether
by ^^enhansing of prices, ^abasing of wares, ^ false
weights, measures, lights, etc.
Q. But are there no other luayes by ivhich a man may
be guilty of theft besides these ?
A. Yes, by ^ vpholding of theft in others, by letting
them escape vnpunished, "^feeding and maintaining
of a sort of theeues, "idlers, as Monkes, Avandring
beggars, etc.
134
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
9 Com.
oZech. 8. 19.
pPsal. 15. 2.
^iGal. 6. 4.
r2 Cor. S. 20,
21.
Phil. 4. 8.
sJoh. 7. 24.
fEpli. 4. 15.
wMat. 1. 19.
.r Jer. 26. 16.
yJer. 9. 3.
2 Tim. 4. 16.
«M.'it. 9 4.
Jam. 2. 4.
1
Q. Which is the ninth Commandement ?
A. Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy
neighbour.
Q. What doth this Commandement aime at ?
A. The maintaining or vpholding of the truth,
and withall of the good name or credit of our selues
and others.
Q. What is required of vs herein ?
A. That we sincerely ^loue the truth, and as occa-
sion requireth Pmake knowne the same, with a due
respect vnto our own and our neighbour's good
generally, and specially to the good name of either.
Q. Hoiv are wee to sheiv our hue to the truth in re-
spect of our selues, and our oivn good name ?
A. 1. By 'lenforming our selues, and iudging
truely in any thing that concerneth our selues, our
owne estate and actions.
2. By ^vpholding a due estimation of our selues
with other men, so farre as may stand with truth
and a good conscience.
Q. How may tvee heepe a good conscience this way in
respect of other men ?
A. 1. By ^iudging truly, and yet charitably of
them and their actions.
2. By * speaking the truth in loue both to them
and of them.
3. By 'Hendring their credit as our owne, and
"^ defending the same against all wrongfull suspicions
and accusations.
Q. How is this Gommaundement violated ?
A. By y neglecting any of these dueties, or by
thinking, speaking, or doing any thing against the
trueth, or to the preiudice of our owne, or our
neighbour's good name.
Q. How may ice offend against the truth ?
A. By ^conceiuing or iudging of things vntruely,
I
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
135
&Eph. 4. 23.
Col. 3. 9.
1 Cor. 4. 6.
dUen. 3. 17.
ePsal. 31. 22.
/Pro. 27. 2.
Act. 8. 9.
SrlSam. 15. 20.
h Job 27. 5.
Col. 2. 18.
il Cor. 13. 5.
kPsal. 15. 3.
1 1 Sam. 22. 9.
mPro. 27. 14.
nl King. 21. 13.
10 Com.
sic.
oHeb. 13. 1.
1 Tim. 6. 8.
p Act. 26. 29.
q Psa. 34. 2.
or by ^speaking or doing that which may cause
others to conceiue of them otherwise than they are,
or than we conceiue them to be.
Q. How may we preiudice or hurt our owne good
name ?
A. By ^conceiuing of our selues, or doing that
which may cause others to conceiue of vs otherwise
than is meete.
Q. How may wee conceiue of our selues otherunse than
meete ?
A, Eyther by ^ouerweening, or ®vndervaluing the
good things that are in vs.
Q. How may we cause others to iudge amisse of vs ?
A. By ^boasting of, or ^excusing our selues
vniustly, or by ^abasing of our selues, and denying
or dissembling God's graces that are in vs.
Q. What is it that tendeth to the preiudice of our
neighbour's good name ?
A. All manner of wrongfull ^suspicions, ^accusa-
tions or reports, eyther vttered by vs, or entertayned
against our neighbours; whether they be vtterly
false, or if true, yet not charitably conceiued or
^vttered, together with all base "^flatterie in com-
mending them more than is meete, eyther to their
faces or behinde their backes.
Q. Hoio is this aggrauated ?
A. When it is done publickly, and specially in
the " place of iudgement.
Q. Which is the tenth or last Commaundement ?
A. Thou shall not couet thy neighbour's house,
etc.
Q. What is required of vs herein ?
A. That wee bee truly ^contented with our owne
outward estate and condition, and heartily p desire
and ^reioyce in the good estate of our neighbours.
136
THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS.
rGen. 25. 22.
A- 1 King. 21.
1, 2.
t2Sa. 23. 15.
u Gen.
a Gal. 5. 26.
6 Ps. 35. 15.
c Eccl. 7. 20.
d 2 Cor. 3. 5.
cMic. 6. 9.
/Psa. 119. (
g-Luke 1. 6.
Phil. 4. 13.
Q. What are the euils contrary hereunto 1
A. They respect eyther our selues or others.
Q. What are the euils that respect our selues ?
A. All kind of ^discontented thoughts about our
owne present condition, together with all inordinate
desires, * wishes, or longings after that which wee
haue not.
Q. But may not a man desire or ivish for that which
he hath not ?
A. Yes, so it be with due moderation and sub-
mission to God's will, and not ioyned with ^mur-
muring at the want of it.
Q. TFhat are the euils forbidden here with respect
vnto others ?
A. All kinde of ^enuying at the prosperity or"
happinesse of others, together with all ^reioycing
or delighting in their hurt.
Q. Is any man able to keepe all these Commandements?
A. No, '^no man lining is able to keepe them
perfectly; neither can any man '^of himselfe per-
forme any one duty required therein as he ought to
doe.
Q. To what end serue they then ?
A. To shew vs ^what is required of vs, and ^what
wee must striue and aspire vnto, which also by the
grace of God ^we may in some measure attaine.
2;
ffi
o
fXH
<
C/5
O
1— 1
i
o
w
<
o
o
11
pL,
w
<
H
H
O
O
Q
W
1
3
u
<
2 Tim
eform of sound w
n faith and love tx
o
Q
S
D^
K
^ ~
ffi
H
<
S''
U
1
C/3
w
f
O
u
o
o
'S
c75
o • '
^ O
pq
^
o
5:
p;
^
CO
'
rH
O
<>,
• 1— 1
(D
cS
S^
P^
>-l
^
fl
o
VJ
Vhh
en
TJ
^'
^
rt
^
^
'T3
Jii
in
rr-t
and the righteous shall go into life
eternall, and the wicked into ever-
lasting punishment. ^2 Cor. v. 10;
^Matt. XXV. 16, 34, 41.
Directions for the Examination of our selves before we come
to the Lord's Supper^ added by the Author.
voke our dul appetite to these
heavenly dainties. 4. Of our love,
which is as the heat of the stomack
to digest Christ and to convey him
into all his members. 5. Of our
reverence and godly fear of that
divine majesty before whom we
come and of the heavenlj'- instruc-
tions we come about. 6. Of our
thankfulnesse to the master of the
feast, who hath made us thus a feast
of the flesh and blood of his own
and only Son.
Q. You said even now that we
must examine our selves before we
come to God's table ; tell me, how
must we examine our selves ? A. The
word \fxanihie\ in the Originall
signifies to prove and try as the
gold-smith doth his gold, which he
doth, we know, two wayes. 1. By
his touchstone, whether it be true
or counterfeit. 2. By the ballance,
whether it be weight, or how much
too light. So must we try our selves
by the touchstone and ballance of
God's Word. 1. Whether we be
Christians (a) only in name, (6) or in
deed, and in truth. 2. If in truth,
then how we come short of what we
should be. (a) Pi,ev. iii. 1 ; (&) 2 Cor.
xiii. 5. More plainly, we must ex-
amine our selves, 1. concerning our
graces, and 2. concerning our sins.
Q. Of what graces must we
examine our selves? A. More
especially of those which more im-
mediatly concern our coming to
God's Table, as, 1. Of our know-
ledge, which is the eye of the soul
to discern what we eat. 2. Of our
faith, which is as the hand of the
soul to receive Christ and all his
merits as the chief nourishment of our
souls. 3. Of our repentance, which
is as a sallet of sowre herbs to pro-
Q. Wherein consists this exami-
nation of our selves concerning
these? A. According to the Scrip-
ture's manner of speaking (which
under words of knowledge compre-
hends affections and practice sutable)
it consists in three things. 1. In
an impartial search whether we have
these graces of which is made up
our wedding garment ; which is a
vesture of gold wrought about with
divers colours, Ps. xlv. 10, that is
to say, the garment of faith inter-
woven with divers other graces,
1 Pet. i. 7 ; Col. iii. 12, 13, 14. 2.
If we find we have those graces,
then the second thing is to prej)are
our selves ; that is to say, to stir
them up, and put them on as the
bride her ornaments against our
158
DIRECTIONS FOR COMMUNICANTS.
coming ; for it is not the bare hav-
ing, but the having on our wedding
garment that makes us welcome
guests, Mat. xxii. 12 ; it is not the
bare having of grace, but the pre-
sent exercise thereof that makes us
worthy receivers. The Corinthians
had all graces, 1 Cor. i. 4, 5, 7, but
(a) because they came not in the
exercise of them (as of their love
and godly fear) they were judged of
God as unworthy receivers, as not
discerning the Lord's body ; we must
therefore quicken and revive our
graces, before we come, and so put
on our wedding garment, {a) 1 Cor.
xi. 18, 21, 29. 3. If we fear we have
not these graces, then the third and
last thing is to bewail our wants and
to fly unto God and to beg them of
him by hearty prayers, James i. 5.
And finding our selves thus groaning
under the sense of our wants, and
hungring and thirsting after God's
grace, we may boldly come ; for
Christ (c) calls all such to come, and
promises {d) they shall be filled,
(c) Mat. xi. 28 ; {d) Mat. v. 6.
Q. You said we must also examine
our selves concerning our sius ; of
what sins especially must we ex-
amine our selves? A. 1. Of scan-
dalous sins whereby we have not
only offended God, and wounded our
own souls, but also scandalized our
brother ; that is to say, grieved the
stronger, and occasioned the weaker
to sin by our example. 2. Of our
wilful defects and decays in grace ;
arising either from our neglect of the
means, or not using them so fre-
quently and conscionably as we
ought, or not approving the occasions
of grace and our former experience
attained unto. •
Q. Wherein consists this examina-
tion of our sins? A. According to
the former use of the Word it con-
sists, 1. In a careful and faithful
searching out our sins with all their
aggravations, as with how high a
hand we have offended ; against
what light we have sinned ; what
oEfence to God and man we have in-
curred ; and what wounds have fol-
lowed on our own souls thereby. 2.
In a diligent enquiry, how we stand
affected to our sins ? As, 1 . Whether
we judge our selves for them
and grieve especially that we have
offended God, grieved his good spirit,
scandalized our brethren, and
wounded our own souls. 2. Whether
we earnestly desire to be freed, not
only from the punishment, but also
from the power of sin, and to be re-
conciled unto God. 3, Whether to
this end, we fly unto Christ, that he
may thus save us from our sins, and
make our peace with God. 4.
Whether we resolve fully with our
selves to leave, by God's grace, our
sins for the time to come, and to
lead new lives ; and to this end, to
use all means appointed by God, and
to use them frequently, and con-
scionably as we ought, and to im-
prove all holy opportunities. And
they again who find it thus with
them they may come with comfort ;
but as for those who are neither
troubled with the want of God's
grace, nor with the burden of their
sins, and coming to God's Table, have
no sense of what they come about ;
nor prepare their hearts to seek the
Lord (2 Chron. xxx. 18, 19), such can-
not be but unworthy receivers : and
so eat judgement to themselves as
not discerning the Lord's body.
Part II.
RUTHERFURD'S
AND
OTHER SCOTTISH CATECHISMS.
ANE CATACHISME
CONTEINING
THE SOUME* OF CHRISTIAN
RELIGION,
By Mr. SAMUELL RUTHERFURD.
I
1. Contro-
versie. Quhat
buikis ar
canonicall.
2. Contro-
versie. Anent
the perfection
of Godis word
denyed by-
Papists.
THE FIRST PART CONCERNING FAITH.
Cap. I.— Of ye Word of God,
Qucestion. QuJiat is the way to lif ceternall ?
Ansivere. To know God and him quliom he hes
sent, Jesus Christ. — Joh. xvii. 3.
Q. Quherein standeth this knowledge ?
A. In faith and good works, that ar the fruits
of faith.— Tit. i. 16 ; 1 Tim. i. 5 ; Psal. xxxviL 3.
Q. Quher may wee learne the doctreyne of faith ?
A. In Godis wisdome (1 Cor. ii. 6) in the Old
and New Testament, conteining all things to mak
us wise to salvatione. — 2 Tim. iii. 16.
Q. Then this JVord of God is a jperfit rule of faith
and manners ?
A. Yea, it is so perfite that they are under a
curse that addeth to it or taketh from it. — Ps. xix.
7; 2 Tim. iii. 16; Luk. xvi. 29; Joh. xx. 31;
1 Cor. ii. 6; Eev. xxii. 19; Deut. xii. 31;
Prov. XXX. 6.
162
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
3. Contro-
versie. Quho
should expon
the Word.
4. Contro-
versie. Anent
the per-
spicuitie of
Godis Word.
5. Contro-
versie. Uf the
author! tie of
the Word and
the edition.
6. Contro-
versie. If
laymen may
read the Word.
* i.e. by guess
or at random.
+ i.e. laid in
pledge.
Q. Quho should expone the Word .?
A. It is playne, and a light to those quho hes
eyes (Psal. cxix. 105 ; 2 Pet. i. 19 ; Deut. xxx. 11),
and in materis needfull to salvation e it expones
itself and those that hes the Spirit of God (2 Cor.
ii. 11 ; Psa. xxv. 9, 12 ; Joh. vii. 12) should expone
the Word by the light of the Word.
Q. For quhat cause should wee believe the Word to he
the Word of God .?
A. Not because men or the kirk sayeth it, but
because God quho can not lie sayeth it. — Joh. v.
33, 34, 35; Math. xvi. 17.
Q. Hes all riien place to read the Word ?
A. All, both learned and unlearned (Joh. v. 39)
should search the Scriptures (Col. iv. 1 6 ; 1 Thess.
V. 21 ; Deut. vi. 6, 7, 8), and try the spirits and the
Word preached, and not receive it be ges * (1 Joh.
iv. 1 ; Actis xvii. 11).
Cap. 2.— Of the Godhead and the blissed Treinitie.
Q. Quhat is the cheif purpose of the Word of God ?
A. To teach us quhat God is in himself, and his
holie nature, and quhat he is in his workis towards
us.
Q. Quhat is God in his nature ?
A. Jehovah having lif and being of himself, and
infinite and incomprehensible in all his properties,
one God (1 Cor. viii. 6; Deut. vi. 4; Deut. xxxii. 39)
in nature ; and three in persones, the Father, Sone,
and ane holie Spirit (Math. iii. 16, 17; 2 Cor.
xiii. 4 ; 1 John v. 7).
Q. Quhat learne yee of this that there ar three
sones lieir ?
A. That our salvatione is sure, because thre
witnesses in heaven hes said that our lif is em-
paundedf in Christ's hand. — 1 Joh.
V. i
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
163
Controversie
with Armi-
liians quho
say his decrees
of things con-
tingent are
conditionall.
Arm. resp. ad
Art, 7.
Controversie
with Armi-
nians and
Jesuits
quether
foreseene
works, fore-
seene faith, or
unbelief be
the cause or
condition
moving God
to elect some,
and to reject
or passe by
others.
Cap. 3.— Of Godis Decree,
Q. Qulutt is God towards us as his creatures ?
A. Our king and the sovereigne lord of all.
Q. Qiiherein standeth his kinglie poioer ?
A. In his free and absolute decree, q'"by in his
wisdome he hes appoynted all things in the world
and bringeth all to passe in his owne tyme.
Q. Quhat ar the properties of his decrees ?
A, They are aeternall (Ephe. i. 4 ; Eom. xi. 34 ;
Eph. iii. 11), unchangeable (Job xxxiii. 13; Isai.
xiv. 24; Psah xxxiii. 10, 11), and righteous (Rom.
ix. 14).
Q. Bot if God have decreed all things unchangeaUie
then wee have not free will to doe or not to doe quhat we
doe?
A. Yea, all the actiones of freewill ar concluded
and appoynted unchangeablie in Godis mynd c/as
men in tyme worketh freelie. — Eph. iii. 10 ; Isai.
xiv. 27; Act. xxvii. 20 . . . 31.
Cap. 4.— Of Predestination.
Q. Quhat decrees hes God concerning manhjnd ?
A. Two, the decrees of electione and reprobatione.
Q. Quhat is Godis decree of electione ?
A. It is the Lordis free appoyntment setting
some men apairt for glorie (Eph. i. 5, 6; Joh. xvii. 6),
and making them his sones in Christ (Ephes. i. 5 ;
2 Thess. ii. 13), for the praise of his glorie (Eph. i. G).
Q. Quhat is the decree of reprobatione 1
A. It is Godis free appoyntment q^by he decreeth
to pass by some and to leave them to the hardness
of their owne heart. — Jude 4; 1 Peter ii. 8 ; 1 Thess.
V. 8 ; Rom. ix. 22 ; 2 Peter ii. 12.
Q. Quhcd r)%oveth God to make this difference ?
A. Nether good nor evill in man (Rom. ix. 11),
but onlie the good pleasure of his will.
164
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Controversie
with Papists
if there be ane
house or place
for soullis
after this lif,
ether purga-
torie, limhus
patrum or
limhus infan-
tum after this
lif.
Cap. 5,— Of the Creation.
Q. How hringeth God his decrees to passe ?
A. By three works — the creatione, the govern-
ment of the world, and the redemptione of lost
mankynd.
Q. Qulio created the world ]
A. God by his sone Christ (Coloss. i. 1 6) and the
holie Speirit (Gen. i. 2).
Q. Quherof maid God all things ?
A. Of nothing. — Heb. xi. 3.
Q. Quhat learne wee of that ?
A. They are foolish that glorieth of nobilitie,
because nothing is the noble blood and old house
that we are come of.
Q. For quhat end maid God all thingls ?
A. For his owne glorie. — Prov. xvi. 4; Rom.
xi. 36; Eev. iv. 11.
Cap. 6. — Of Man.
Q. Qithen was man maid ?
A. In the last of the six dayes.
Q. Quhy so ?
A. To teach us to trust in God for all wee neid,
quho furnished the house of heaven and earth for
us ere wee was maid.
Q. Quherof is man maid 1
A. His bodie is made of earth to teach clay not
to be proud, and his soull of a heavenlie substance
to teach him not to seek clay for his portione, as
many bastard soules doe, bot to seek God. — Acts
xii. 23 ; Psal. xxxix. 5 ; Isai. xl. 6.
Q. Can the soul die ?
A. No, bot quhen the bodies goetli to the earth
some ar caried up to paradise, otheris thrust into
liell.— Luk. xvi. 19, etc.; Rev. vi. 9, 10.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
165
*i.e. matched
or associated.
Q. Q'of tvas the woman maid ?
A. Of ane ribbe of the manes side, to teach us
that God hes marrowed* man and woman togidder
as helpis one to another.
Q. Quhat ar wee taught by this that the soull cannot
die ?
A. Seeing the soull must flitf it wer wisdome for
us to seek a lodging to it in heaven. — Luk. xvi.
1, 2, etc.
Q. Quhat is the princijMll pairt of this soidl ?
A. The conscience.
Q. Quhat is the conscience .?
A. It is the judging pairt of the soull under God,
teaching and counselling good and comforting us
quhen we doe it (1 Joh. iii. 20; Job xvi. 19, 20;
Joh. xvii. 1), and forbidding ill and tormenting us
after wee have committed ill (Gen. iii. 8; iv. 13).
Q. Quhat ar the lights that directeth conscience 1
A. The law of nature in manes heart and the
light of the Word ar the two candles that God hes
lighted to lett it see to walk.
Q. Quhat ar the proper works of conscience 7
A. It works ether upon the law as ane litle God,
or upon our deeds as a witnes, or it applyeth the
law to our deeds as a judge.
Q. Quhat ar the ivorks of conscience upon the law ?
^. In so farr as it knoweth the law it bindeth us
to obedience with a knot that nether king nor kirk
can loose (Rom. i. 1 4 ; Rom. vi. 16; Acts xx. 2 2 ;
1 Cor. ix. 16), and urgeth us to obey (Jer. xx. 9).
Q. Quhat of the erring conscience ,?
A. It bindeth so that he sinneth quho doth any
thing against a conscience howbeit erring, because
conscience is Godis depute, and he that striketh a
private man, believing him to be the king, is esteemed
a striker of the king, and therfor he (that) doeth
166
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
acquits.
+ Perhaps
burning heat,
misery,
torment.
against aiie erring conscience sinneth formaUter et
intei'jtretative quamvis non materialiter, for the thing
he doeth is good, but he sinnis in moclo.
Q. JVhat ar the workis of conscience as a witnes of
our deeds ?
^. It is as a watch doog in the soull that heireth
the noyse of theifes feet, and as the eye that seeth
quhat the hand doeth. — Psal. 1. 22 ; cxix. 59 ; Hag.
i. 5 ; Jer. v. 24 ; 2 Cor. xiii. 5.
'Q. Quhat ar the faidtis of conscience heere ?
A. Of tin it is blind and dead (Isai. xliv. 18 ; Eccl.
iv. 8) through presumption (Rev. iii. 17) and want
of Goddis fear.
Q. Quhat ar the workis of conscience in so farr as it
aijplieth the laiv to our workis ?
A. It aquitis* us and appro veth us quhen wee doe
weel (Rom. ii. 15 ; Job xvi. 19, 20 ; Psal. vii. 4, 5 ;
Job xxix. 13, 14; Job xxxi.) from the q^^ commeth
a feast of joy in the soul (Prov. xv. 15; 2 Cor. i. 12),
and boldnes (Prov. x. 9 ; Prov. xxviii. 1), and ac-
cuseth and condemneth quhen wee doe evill (2 Sam.
xxiv. 10; Math, xxvii. 3; Gen. xlii. 21, 22), and
from this commeth despair (Heb. x. 27), fear (Gen.
iii. 1 ; Prov. xxviii. 1 ; Rev. vi. 1 6), shame (Gen.
V. 7; Rom. vi. 21), sadnes (1 Sam. xxv. 31 ; Actis
ii. 37), and brunt f of mynde (Isa. Ixvi. 24).
Q. Quhat ar the faidtis of the conscience as a judge 2
A. Oftin it maketh men think the way to hell is
the right way (Prov. xxi. 2; Ps. 1. 21 ; Zacha. xi. 5),
and turneth a dumb dogge, that barketh not at the
commyng of the theefe.
Q. Quhat ar the causes of those faidtis in conscience ?
A. Ignorance of God (Psal. xiv. 1), and the loud
crying of affectiones sent out to woo a wiff to
Sathan, casting ane uncouth sound in the eares, and
mist in the eyes of conscience.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
167
Q. How many sortis of consciences are fher ?
A. Many and sundrie, good or evill, weak or
strong, dead or living, etc.
Q. Quhat is the use of the doctrine of conscience ?
A. Seeing wee carie our judge with us in our
breist q^^ wee tack* ether to heaven or hell with us,
and cannot putt on or off our conscience as wee doe
our garments, wee should feare to sinne before our
conscience and reverence ourself.
Cap. 7.— Of Man's Estait before his Fall.
Q. Quhat was man's estait befor he fell ?
A. His bodie was free of seeknesf and death, and
his soull indued with Godis image in righteousness
and holiness. — Gen. i. 27; Eccl. vii. 29; Eph. iv. 24.
Q. Quhat els ?
A. He was maid with his face to look to heaven
to teach him to follow his look, and condemn those
whose face looks up to heaven and their soull down
to clay.
Q. Quhat was the perfectione of the whole man ?
A. He was able to doe Godis will, in favour with
his maker and lord of the world.
Cap. 8.— Of the Angells.
Q. Quhat other excellent creatures maid God besid
man ?
A. The angells.
Q. Quhat ar the angells ?
A. Understanding spirits created of God holie
and happy.
Q. How many sortis of angells be ther ?
A. Two, good and elect ; evill and reprobat.
168
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
+ i.e. chained.
X Chap.
§ (. e. while.
Q. QuJiat is the sort of the good angellis ?
A. They excell in wisdome (2 Sam. xiv. 20),
power (1 Thess. i. 1 ; Psal. ciii. 20; 2 Kings xix. 39),
and glorie (Luk. ix. 26; Actis vi. 15 ; Dan. x. 5, 6),
and abideth in heaven beholding Godis face (Math,
xviii. 10), except they be sent down by God to the
earth.
Q. Quhat is their office ?
A. They are Godis guard or messengers sent his
erandis, and as nources * and pedagoges waiteth upon
the elect.
Q. Quhat ar the evill angells 1
A. Spirits created of God, that fell from God by
sinne. — Jude 6.
Q. Quhat is their estait now ?
A. God hes them now cheingzeedt by his pouer
as evill doers keepid to a great court, except when
he letteth them loose to torment the wicked and
try the godlie. — Job ii. 2 ; 1 Pet. v. 8 ; Eph. vi. 12.
Chap. 8. J— Of Godis Providence.
Q. Quhat is the second work ([hy God hringeth his
decrees to ;pass ?
A. By the work of his providence and govern-
ment of the world.
Q. Quhat ar the speciall works of God's providence ?
A. Three, first he beareth up all things in his
armes els they wold turne to nothing. — Acts xvii.
28 ; Col. i. 17 ; Heb. i. 3 ; Psal. civ. 29.
Q, Quhat learne zou of this ?
A. They are unthankful that sinnes against God
in his verie armes lik cursed childrene that strikis
the mother's face evin q^'^§ as shee hes them in hir
armes.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
169
Of chaunce,
see Prov. xvi.
33 ; Exod.
xxi. 18 ;
1 Kings xxii.
34.
Controv.
with Armin,
qhether or no
God deter-
mineth and
applyeth by a
previous
motion all
second causes,
and especially
free will, or
doth God onlie
with a joint
influence con-
voy them on
their work-
ing. — Job xii.
16, 17 ; 2 Sam.
xvii. 14 ; Gen.
xxxix. 21 ;
Isai. IV. 16.
Contro, with
Armin. anent
God's decree-
ing with sinne.
Q. Quhat is the second work ?
A. He setteth all things that worketh and moveth
to work, as the rider spurring his horse or the car-
penter that moveth his axe or saw q"^ wold not
move nor cut except he moved them. — Isai. x. 5, 15;
Math. X. 29 ; Job xxxix. 5 ; Job xxxviii. 5 ; Eph.
i. 11; Job xxxix. 25; xxvi. 7; Job xl. 9; Job
xxxviii. 35.
Q. Then nothing falls out hy chance or fortune ?
A. Noe, not a hair from our head (Math. x. 29),
nor a sparrow falleth to the ground but by Godis
counsel, will, and power (Luk. xii. 6) ; good and evill,
favour and hatred (Amos iii. 6; Lam. iii. 37, 38;
Isai. xlv. 7 ; Deut. xxxii. 42 ; Ezek. xiv. 20 ; Judg.
ii. 14 ; Acts iv. 28 ; Rev. xvii. 17), and all things els
ar from him.
Q. Bot is it not enough to say that God accompanies
all things in their working, and moves them, hot they set
themselves first to tvork ?
A. No, it is not enough, for God moveth evrie
creature, and also moves free will to all their works
(Prov. xxi. 1 ; Prov. xxix. 26 ; Exod. iii. 21, 22 ;
Prov. xvi. 7; Judg. ix. 2, 3 ; Isai. xxix. 14), for all
prayers to God that he wold move men to love and
favour us, and bow our will to feare his name wer
in vaine if God did suffer our will to begin to work,
and then cam in like a page to convoy it in working
onlie.
Q. Quhat learne we of this ?
A. That men in doing good or evill to us ar bot
staffes in God's hand, and it teacheth us to give
our wills over to be ruled by God that he may ride
upon them and spurr them forward to good.
Q. Quhat is the thrid work of providence ?
A. By his eternal wisdome and power he directeth
all things, evin sinne, to his owne glorie. — Gen. 1. 20.
170
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Cont. with
Armin. ,
Papists,
and pretendit
Lutlierianes if
God by a naked
perniissione
onlie hardens
men's heartis.
■^i.e. stanged
or stuns.
Q, May not the creatures he caried towards God's
glorie of their owne accord ?
A. Nay, they cannot doe that more then ane
shipp can saill to the right harbour without ane
pilot, or ane armie of soldiers can keep rank with-
out ane commander.
Q. Hes God any hand in sinn ?
A. He suffereth men to sinne, and punisheth sinne
and directeth it to his owne glorie; hot he nether
alloweth, loveth, nor commandeth sinne.
Q. Bot is not God the author of sinne quhen he
hardeneth mens hearts ?
A. Not at all, ffor God, as the ruler of the world
and judge, leiveth men to hardin their owne heart,
and so punisheth sinne by sinne (Psal. Ixxxi. 11, 12;
Eom. i. 24; 2 Thess. ii. 11, 12) as that no guilt
cleaveth to him.
Q. Doth God anything in hardening the heart hot
looketh on them and leiveth men to harden or not to
harden their owne heartis ?
A. Yea, he doth not onlie look on; bot his pro-
vidence worketh and moveth as a ruler and judge.
Q. How can God then hee free of sinne if he ivorketh
in sin ?
A. The Lord can touch a serpent and not be
stagned,* and as a good painter draweth blak lines
in the image to mak the quhyt appear more beautiful,
and the physitiane extracteth good oyle out of
poysonable hearbes, and the musitian makes the
mistuned harpe to send out a pleasant sound, evin
so God in the hardening of men's hart doth the
pairt of a judge justlie and holilie.
Q. Bot if there he a providence that rulleth all things
quhy ar the wicked happie and rich in this lif and the
godlie in trouble ?
A. The wicked are not happie, because God
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
171
maketh them stand upon a louse* stone, qu^^ falling
they must fall, and their happines is hot a dreame
that doth quicklie turn to nothinge (Psal. Ixxiii.
18, 19, 20), and the godlie in troubles ar loved of
God, and ar nurtured as bairnes, and at lenth
enjoyes the inheritance; nether is it happines to
the oxe that it is fedde against the day of slaughter.
Cap. 8.— The Fall of Man.
Q. Qulmt is the most speciall worh where ])TOvidence
is seene ?
A. In that God suffered Adam to sinne, and did
therby tak occasion to send Christ in the world to
save sinners.
Q. Quhat is sinne ?
A. A breach of the law of God. — 1 Joh. iii. 4.
Q. How many evills leaveth sinne behind it after it is
committed ?
A. Ffour, 1, the offence of God (2 Sam. xi. 27 :
Dent. xxix. 19, 20; Judg. ii, 13, 14), called a
wearieing of God (Isai. i. 24; Isai. xliii. 24; Ezek.
vi. 9; Amos ii. 13); 2, the blott and defylling of
the soul (Mat. xv. 11, 12); 3, the guilt of sinne,
and 4, the punishment of sinne.
Q. Quhat is the guilt of sinne ?
A. It is the debt and obligatioun of sinn q^'by
the sinner lyeth under God's justice to be punished
as ane evill doer that is in the judges courtbook
under processe, and as the diver f quhose name
standeth in the bandj after he hes borrowed manie
sowmes
XV. 17;
of monie.—
Job XX. 11,
■Gen. iv. 5 ; Job x. 8 ; 1 Cor.
Q. Quhat should wee learne of this ?
A. Wee should be lik wise debters that taketh
little on and taketh course with the debtis in due
tym. — Math. v. 25.
172
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
i.e. tempted.
Chap. 11.
Quhether con-
cupiscence
befor the con-
sent of the
will he a sinn.
Contr. with
Papists and
Arrainians.
Q. Quho sinned first ?
A. The devill, and he temped* Evahto eat of the
fruitt of the forbidden tree, and shee temped hir
husband Adam.
Q. Was God any cause of that sinne ?
A. No, the Lord maid man such a creature as
that he might, if he wold, have obeyed God.
Q. Can Sathan force us against our will to sinne ?
A. No, he tempteth us and knocketh at the door
without, bot our will and lust oppineth the doore.
Sathan is midwiife that helpeth forward the birth,
bot our will and lust is father and mother to all
our sinnes.
Cap. 9.— Of Sinn Originall and Actuall.
Q. Quhat pairt have tvee in AdamJs sinne ?
A. Because the covenant was mad with Adam
and with us all in his loynes, therefor wee ar guiltie
of his sinne, and for that cause ar depry ved of Godis
image, and inclined to all evill, and unable to any
good.-
-Psal. li. 5 ; Job xiv. 4 ; Joh. iii. 6.
Q. Quhat is the fruitt of this sinne of our nature ?
A. Wee ar under Godis wraith in all evills that
befalleth us in this lif, and everlasting condemna-
tion and the fire of hell in the lif to come.
Q. Quhat is the greatest evill we ar under in this
lif?
A. Our dayly sinning against God.
Q. Can wee live and not sinne ?
A. No, for our concupiscence and the inclination
of our heart evin befor our will consent is sine
(Rom. vii. 5), because it rebells against the law of
God.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
173
Q. Bot in the regenerat this concupiscence cannot he
scene, for they ar washed from their sinns in Chris fs
blood?— Rev. i. 6; 1 Pet. i. 18.
A. Concupiscence in the guilt and power of con-
demning is fullie takin away (Rom. viii. 1), because
God reckonetli it as satisfied for in Christ, bot in
the blot and root it remaineth in this lif.
Q. How can that he ?
A. One lion bound in an yron chaine hath the
nature of a lion, howbeit then he cannot devoure.
Concupiscence is sinne in the regenerat, bot it can
not condemne them becaus Christ was both judged
and condemned for all our sinnes.
Q. Quhat sinnes should wee cheeflie he awar of ?
A. Reigneing and commanding sinnes and the
sinne against the holie S^^irit.
Q. Quhat ar the tokins of a reigning sinne ?
A. If men strive not against their lusts (Rom.
vii. 13), bot obey them with delit* and greedines
(Prov. ii. 14), and ar ledd more with the love of
sinne than the love of God. — Philip, iii. 19.
Q. Quhat is the sinne against the holie Ghost ?
A. It is a malitious and willfull sinning against
the treuth revelled by the holie Spirit to the con-
science in dispightt of the spirit of grace. — Heb.
X. 26; Joh. V. 16.
Q. Quhat is the imnishment of this sinne ?
A. It is plagued with a reprobat mynd, and a
heart that cannot repent, and is never pardoned. —
Mat. xii. 32; Mark iii. 29.
Cap. io.— Of Free Will.
Q. Quhat hahilitie have wee he natur to know and
love God ?
A. Our mynd and conscience is blinded, for that
wee judge the things of God foolishnes (1 Cor. ii. 1 1 ;
174
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
strength.
t i.e. into.
Homo natuva-
liter diligit
Deum ainore
concupi-
scentias non
amore anii-
citise.
Contr. with
Arm. if God
hes given uni-
versal! grace
to all men
qrby they may
all if they will
be saved.
Cont. with
Armin. if God
of his free and
absolut will,
or if for re-
spect to the
worth and
good use or
bad use of the
gifts of natur.
God sendeth
his gospell or
denieth it.
Mat. xvi. 23), and our will and afFectiones so corrupt
that wee cannot believe nor com to Christ except
the Father draw us. — Joh. vi. 44 ; Cant. i. 2.
Q. Ar wee able hy the strentW^ of our natur to do a
tvork that is truelie good he/or God ?
A. Nay, wee cannot of ourselvis so much as think
a good thought. — 2 Cor. iii. 5 ; Joh. xv. 5 ; Mat.
vii. 17, 18.
Q. Quhat learne yee of this ?
A. That our honestie befor men will not save us,
for except wee bee borne againe wee cannot enter
int the kingdome of God. — Joh. iii. 3.
Q. Bot hes man no knowledge of God hy nature ?
A. He knoweth ther is a God, and that sinne is
forbiddin, bot this knowledge is weak and insufficient
to bring us to Christ.
Q. Doth not man hy natur love God ?
A. He loveth God by natur as a man his horse,
because it helpeth him in his jorney, bot he cannot
love God sinceerlye and truelie, resting upon him as
his onlie hapines, nether can he love him as a man
doth his friend.
Q. Hes not all men grace given to them cfhy they ar
able {if they wold doe their pairt) to goe forward to the
state of conversion to God in Christ ?
A. No, truelie, for the Scripture could not say we
ar dead in sinne, and that some cannot repent if all
had such grace.
Q. Quhat 7noveth God to send the gospell to some
natiouns and deny it to others ?
A. His onlie good pleasur and nothing els.
Q. Ar then the works of men not in Christ sinfull .?
,A. Yea, God esteemeth them ill fruit because the
tree is evil, and quhatever is not done of faith is
sinne. — Rom. xiv. 23; Heb. xi. 6 ; Joh. xv. 5.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
175
Cap. lo.— Of the Covenant, New and Old.
Q. TVliat is the thid* work cfby God bringeth his
decrees to jms ?
A. By the work of redemption.
Q. Quhat ar the degrees of this loorh .?
A. One in this life, ane other in the last judg-
ment, quhen wee shall fullie be delivered.
Q. Quhat things have wee to learne of our redemptione
in this lifi
A. Two ; one how it is purchased in Christ, and
ane other how it is applyed unto us.
Q. Quher is the purchased redemption offered to us ?
A, In the new covenant.
Q. How many covenants maid God with man ?
A. Two; the covenant of works and the cove-
nant of grace.
Q. Quhat is the soume of the covenant of works ?
A. God promiseth to us lif everlasting, and wee
ar oblished to keep the law by the strenth of our
nature. — Rom. x. 5 ; Gal. iv. 23, 24.
Q. With quhom did God mak the covenant ?
A. With Adam and with all mankind in him.
Q. Can wee keep this covenant .?
A. No. Ther is none righteous that sinneth not.
Q. Ar loee not then under condemnation ?
A. Yea, certainlie, bot now in Christ wee ar
dead, and our first husband, the law, hes no mor
power over us than the dead husband hes over the
wife, for wee ar maried to one other husband, evin
to Christ.
Q. Quhat is the contract of mariage ?
A. The covenant of grace.
Q. Quhat is the soume of the covenant ?
176
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Contr. with
Arm. and
Papists if
oiilie faith
or if faith
conjoyned
with good
works be ye
condition of
ye new cove-
nant.
2. Contr. with
Arm. if ye
covenant of
grace be maid
with all the
race of man-
kind or onlie
with the elect.
*i.e. grasps
or seizes
hold of.
+ familiar.
Let. 297.
A. Quhosoever beleeveth in Christ lies lif eternall.
— Joh. iii. 16.
Q. Quliat doth God promise to us in the nev) covenant ?
A. Fforgivenes of our sinnes, renovatione of our
natur, and lif eternall. — Jer. xxxi. 33, 34 ; Dan.
ix. 24 ; Eze. xxxvi. 26, 27 ; Joh. iii. 16.
Q. Quhat is the condition of the covenant ?
A. Onlie saving and true faith. — Rom. x. 6 ;
Gal. iv. 24, 25, 26.
Q. With quhom hes God maid the new covenant ?
A. Not with all mankind as with the covenant
of works, hot onlie with the elect people of God. —
Jer. xxxi. 33 ; Jer. xxxii. 36, 37.
Q. Quhairfor is faith the onlie condition of the new
covenant ?
A. Because the new covenant is a masse of
promises laying the weight of our salvatione upon
a stronger than wee ar, to witt upon Christ, and
faith grippeth* promises and maketh us to goe out
of ourselves to Christ as being homelief with Christ.
Q. Bot seeing the covenant and the promises therof
ar preached to all, how is it not ivith all to quhom it is
preached ?
A. The promises ar propounded to all outwardlie,
bot the elect ar onlie the heires and the bairnes of
the promeis to quhom the inheritance is bought. —
Eom. ix. 8; Gal. iii. 29.
Q. How differeth this covenant from the covenant of
works ?
A. It is a better covenant (Heb. vii. 22), not
because the first covenant was unjust, for it was
both holie and spirituall, bot it is better to us.
Q. For quhat cause is it better to us ?
A. For many causes, bot especiallie because the
.covenant of works was maid with Adam, quhose free
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
177
will slew himself and us, bot Christ is the cautioner
of this covenant. — Heb. vii. 22.
Q. How is he the cautioner ?
A. Thequhol* promises of the covenant are maid
to Christ as principall, and to us as his heires and
assignayes (Heb. vii. 22 ; Psal. Ixxxix. 26, 27, 28 ;
Heb. i. 5 ; Isai. Iv. 5 ; Gal. iii. 16), quho subscriveth
the covenant for us.
Q. How can the promise he made to him, for llf ever-
lasting is not promised to Christ upon conditione of faith I
A. Bot God hes promised to Christ for his
sufferings manie childrene and heires to be his seed
(Isai. liii. 10; Heb. ii. 10, 13), and hes empaundedf
all fullnes of grace in his hand^ that out of his
fullnes wee may receive grace to keep the covenant.
Q. Quhat comfort have ye of that ?
A. Exceeding great, because if I be within the
covenant of grace it is (to speak so with reverence
of my lord) a shame for Christ to loose me since he
is cautioner for me.
Q. Quhat is the second priviledge of this covenant ?
A. The covenant of workis is broking this is
eternall, groundit upon God's love and Christ's
death.
Q. Bot may not our free icill goe hah and hreah the
covenant 2
A. Nay, bot the cautioner quho is bound for us
putts his fear in our heart that we shall not, yea,
that we can not depairt from him. — Jer. xxxii. 40 ;
Eze. xxxvi. 26 ; Joh. vi. 37.
Q. Quhat is the thrid priviledge of this covenant ?
A. The covenant of works sayth ether doe or dee, J
and like a sever creditor and hard judge, will nether
hear of repentance, nor forgive us a farthene,§ nor
graunt us a day, bot presentlie for the least sinne
hurleth all into hell; the covenant of grace, lik a
M
178
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
"'^ change his
mind or relent
upon poor
debtors or
banki'upts.
Cont. with
Papists if the
promises
spirituall were
maid to the
Jewes and
seiled in their
sacraments
no lesse than
to us.
Chap. 14.
meek creditor will *rew upon poore divers, and will
mak them weelcom whenever they believe.
Q. Quhat moved God to mak this covenant ?
A. His owne free mercie and grace, for when he
maid it wee was like forlorne bastards or half dead
foundlings that wer cast out in the oppin feild to
die in our owne blood, quhen our Lord cam by and
maid a covenant with us. — Eze. xvi. ; Gen. iii. 1 5 ;
Isa. ix. 6 ; Joh. iii. 1 6 ; Tit. ii. 11; Eom. v. 1 ;
1 Joh. iv. 9.
Q. Bot wee must ijay the duetie of faith, and there-
for it seemeth the covenant is not free ?
A. Yea, for all that it is most free, for our Lord
payeth for us and maketh us beleeve. — Philip, i. 29 ;
Eze. xxxvi. 27 ; Eph. ii. 19 ; Joh. vi. 44.
Q. How many wayes is the covenant of groxe declared ?
A. Two ways ; of old to the Jewes undir shadow
and types in the law of ceremonies, and in the new
testament clearlie in Christ.
Q. Qiiherfor call yee it a testament ?
A. Because the covenant was seiled with Christ's
blood, and our Saviour dieing left to us in legacie
all the blissings of the covenant. — Heb. ix. 16, 17.
Q. Was then the yeojple of the Jewes saved as wee ar ?
A. Yea, that sam way, for Christ is the Lamb
slaine from the foundation of the world (Rev. xiii.),
onlie the covenant of works was hardlie urged in
the old testament, and Christ in the sacrifices
darklie shadowed.
Cap. 10.— Of the Natur and Persone of our Saviour.
Q. Quhat have wee to learne of our Saviour in this
covenant ?
A. Two things; his natur and his office.
i
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
179
Q. Quhat persone is our Saviour ?
A. The second persone, the Sone of God.
Q. Quherfor rather the Sone than the Father and the
holie Spirit ?
A. The Sonne was the fittest persone, that by
him wee might receive the adoptione of sonnes. —
Gal. iv. 4.
Q. Quhat then doth the Father for us in the worTc of
our redemption ?
A. He sent his Sone and graced* him for the work
with the Spirit of God above his fellows (Isai. vi. 8 ;
Psal. xlv. 2, 7 ; John i. 14, 16) ; he laid our sinnes
upon him, accepting him as cautioner (Isai. liii. 6 ;
2 Cor. V. 21); he craved the debt, and put him to
death for us.
Q. Quhat learne ijou of this ?
A. AVee may not think the Father more just or
angrier at sinne then the Sonne, nor this Sonne more
merciefuU or sooner pleased than the Father, bot
there is one mercie alik in all the three to pittie
man, and one justice alik in all the three to pursue
sinne.
Q. Quhat sort of per sone is Christ ?
A. True God, sequall in nature with the Father
and Spirit (Joh. i. 1 ; Isa. vi. ; Joh. ix. 37 ; Jer.
xxiii. 6 ; 1 Tim. iii, 16 ; Eev. xvii. 14), and true
mane, lik us in all things except sinn. — Heb. iv. 15.
Q. Quhy was our Saviour God ?
A. That he might beare in his person e Godis
wraith, q^'^ no creatur, man or angell, could doe, and
obtean righteousnes to us, and overcome death and
hell for us.
Q. Quhy should he bee man ?
A. That he might die for man, and knit God and
man togidder in his owne persone (Heb. ii. 14), and
180
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
ti.e.appointed
meeting-place.
have compassion upon us under our temptationes.
— Heb. iv. 15.
Q. How prove ye that he is God and man in one per-
sone ?
A. Because the sam* bairne that is borne to us is
called the mightie God. — Isai. vi. 9 ; Luk. i. 31, 32 ;
Joh. ix. 35, 36, 37 ; Eom. ix. 5.
Q. Quhat ar the parts of his coming in the flesh ?
A. Both his conception and birth.
Q. How was he conceived ?
A. The holie Spirit without the helpe of man
overshadowed the Virgine Mary, and sanctified a
pairt of her seed, and cleansed it from the pollution
of sinne, and therof formed the bodie of our Lord.
Q. How was he home ?
A. In the fulnes of tyme the Sone of God took
upon him man's nature in a personall union.
Q. How ar the two natures knit togidder ?
A. The two naturs ar not changed the one into
the other, nether ar they mixed through other as
wine and water, nether ar they divided one from
another as two sundrie persones ; bot in one persone
the nature of God and all his properties, and the
nature of man and all his properties remaineth in
their owne seat and estait.
Q. Quhat followeth upon this union ?
A. That Christ is a trystingf place q^ God and
man meet togidder, and the sufferings of Christ is of
infinit vertue, because his death and blood is the
death and blood of God.
Q. Quhat further ?
A. The Godhead dwelling bodilie inthemanhead
is a well of grace, the manhead the channell through
q^^ all grace floweth to us, and Christ, God man, is
adored by man and angell.-
Joh. xiv. 1 ; Acts vii. 59.
-Eph.i. 22; Joh. v. 22
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
181
Chap. 15.
Job xxxiii. 23.
ruleth.
Cap. II.— Of Christis Office.
Q. Quhat is Christ's office ?
A. He is mediator betwixt God and man.
Q. Is ther any mediator hot Christ ?
A. Non at all, nether man nor angell (Joh. xiv.
6; 1 Tim. ii. 5), and therfor they robbe Christ of
his glorie quho setts anie in the mediator's chair
with Christ.
Q. Row many works doth he as a mediator 2
A. Six.
Q. Quhat is the first .?
A. As a Dayesman, by his Spirit accompanying
the law, he maketh us see wee ar the partie offend-
ing, and that God is righteous.
Q. Quhat is the second ?
A. As Si messinger and angell of the covenant
(Mai. iii. 1) he cometh with good news, offering
peace to man (Isa. Ixi. 1, 2), and reporteth of our
obedience to his Father. — Joh. xvii. 14, 25.
Q. Quhat is the thrid ?
A. As a cautioner he payeth a ransome for us,
his own life.— Mat. xx. 28 ; 1 Pet. i. 18.
Q. Quhat is the fourth ?
A. As ane advocat and friend, he pleadeth and
maketh request at Godis hands for us. —Rom. viii.
32; 1 Joh. ii. 1.
Q. Quhat is the fyft ?
A. He rueleth* us so by his Spirit that God and
wee cannot cast out againe, and confirmeth us to the
end.— 1 Cor. i. 18 ; Col. iii. 3 ; Joh. x. 28, 29.
r.
I
182
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
i.e. whether.
Chap. 16.
tyou.
Q. Quhat is the sixt ?
A. He presenteth us as ane holie chaste virgine
in the manage day, in oure fair wedding garment,
without sinne. — Eph. v. 27.
Q. Quither^ is Christ mediator as God or as man ?
A. In both naturs, for each natur worketh that
q^^ is proper to itself.
Q. Quherin differeth Christ from other mediators ?
A. Especiallie in this, that both the pairties, both
God and man, did strik him and wound him, and
yet our patient Jesus took a strok of both, and
would not flee till he agreed them.
Cap. 12,— Of his Prophecie.
Q. Quhy is our Saviour called Jesus ?
A. Because he saveth his people, both by death
from the guilt and blot of their sinne, and also
applyeth the purchased redemption to them all —
Mat. xi. 21; Heb. ii. 14, 15.
Q. Quhy is he called Christ or Messiah ?
A. Because he was set apairt, and graced with
the oyle of grace, to be a prophet, a king, and a
priest. — Psal. xlv.
Q. Quho called him to this office ?
A. His Father maid him a propheit (Isa. Ixi. 1 ;
Isa. xlix. 6), a king (Psal. ii.), and a preist. — Psal.
ex.
Q. Quhat comfort ham zow^ of that ?
A. I know quhat he doth in the work of my
salvation will stand good be law.
Q. Quherin is he a propheit ?
A. In teaching us the quhole will of God, both
by himself in the dayes of his flesh, and by sending
propheits and apostles for that eff'ect. — Joh. i. 18,
19; Joh. XV. 15.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
183
Q. How differeth he from other propheits ?
A. He opineth the heart to beleeve (Joh. v. 25 ;
Joh. vi. 68), and confirmeth it with miracles, q^^
non other can doe.
Q. Hoiv maketh he us propheits ?
A. By his Spirit he maketh us know God, to
teach and exhort one another. — Col. iii. 16 j Heb,
vi. 10.
Cap. 13.— Of his Kingdom,
Q. Qiiho called Christ to be king ?
A. His Father putt the crowne upon his head ;
he entered not to the throne by violence, blood, or
tyrannie. — Psal. ii. 6 ; Dan. ii. 44 ; Luk. i. 32.
Q. Bot is not Christ a king for ever ?
A. As God he needed not receive a kingdome, bot
as mediator his Father gifted him with a kingdome
to him and all his heires.
Q. Quhat comfort have ye in this ?
A. Christ hes loved us, quho thocht* he could not
keep heaven or his owne kingdome, bot wold needs
leave his Father's house to come downe and seek us
poor slaves.
Q. How manie kingdomes hes Christ as mediator ?
A. Three, a kingdome of power, of grace, of
glorie.
Q. Quhat is Christ's kingdome of power ?
A. The hand of Christ's power comming in and
bearing up the quholef frame of natur tottering and
like to fall to nothing throwgh Adam's sinne. —
Gal. i. 17 ; Heb. i. 2.
Q. Quhat ar the ivorks of Christ in the kingdome of
grace ?
A. As the onlie head and king of the kirk, he
gives laws to his kirk (Isa. vi. 9 ; Isa. xxii. 22 ;
184
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
*i.e. sceptre.
t like fire.
% Sic, for
stone.
§ white.
Heb. iii. 6), gathers his subjects, and rules over their
conscience by the scepture * of his sword (Ps. xlv. 3 ;
Rev. i. 16 ; Rev. vi. 2 . . 4), he rewards his subjects
(Eph. iv. 8; Luk. xxiii. 43; Rev. iii. 21), and
maketh all his enemies his footstoole (Ps. ex. 5 ;
ii. 9 ; Ixxii. 9 ; Mat. xxv. 34 ; Psal. Ixix. 28 ; Isai.
xxxii. 1).
Q. Quhaf pro^perties is m Christ as Icing ?
A. First, power and authoritie to doe quhat he
pleaseth, having feet lik fine brasse burning lik fir,f
shawing that quher he setteth downe his feet he
will goe fordward in despight of his enemies, and
his power is seene in that the stifFest knees in
heaven and earth shall bow to him. — Rom. xiv. 1 1 ;
Zach.
IX.
xxviii. 18.
10; Psal.
Ixxii. 8 : Dan. vii. 1 4 ; Mat.
Q. Quhat is the second propertie ?
A. He lies wisdome, and is the sonnej: with sevin
eyes full of knowledge (Zach. iii. 9), the counsellar
(Isai. ix. 6), his head and hair lik quhyt§ woole, als
quhyt as snow, and his eyes lik flamming fire, to
show that he is ane aged and most wyse senator.
Q. Quhat is the thricl propertie of this king ?
A. Most glorious (Rev. x. 1 ; Psal. xlv. 8), for he
that rideth on the cloudis hes ane rainbow on his
head, hes face as the sunne, and his one foot standeth
on the sea and his other on the earth, ^tt qlk tym he
standeth upon his owne ground.
Q. Quhat is the fourth propertie .?
A. He is most just in his government (Psal. xlv.
6, 7 ; Ixxii. 2), for justice goeth about him as a belt
or girdle (Isai. xi. 5 ; xlii. 1, 2, 3).
Q. Quhat ar the ptroperties of the kingdome ?
A. It is spirituall over the conscience, the govern-
ment spiritual], voyd of worldlie pompe, the scepter
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
185
spiritual!, the rewards givin to his friends spirituall,
and it is eternall. — Luk. i. 33 ; Dan. iii. 44.
Q. Bot will not Christ render the kingdome to Us
Father ?—l Cor. xv.
A. He does bot make ane accompt of his con-
quesse* to his Father, and ruleth no mor by the
word and sacraments as he doth now.
Q. Quhen began Jesus to reigne ?
A. Even quhen the blissed seed was promised to
Adam, bot quhen he ascended to heaven he was as
it wer crowned and putt in full possessione of glorie
in the eyes of all.— Mat. xxviii. 18; Acts ii. 36;
Phil. ii. 9; Dan. vii. 13, 14.
Q. Quhat is his kingdome of glorie ?
A. It is the full perfectione of grace, quher he
shall bee all in all to his sainctis.
Q. Cam he to this Jcingdoom by meritt ?
A, No, because he is borne king, bot he cam to
it by conquessingf it to him and his.
Q. HoiD maketh he us kings ?
A. Quhen he giveth us faith q^by wee overcome
the world (1 Joh. v. 4), and Sathan and death, and
by his Spirit he crucifieth sinn in us (Gal. vi. 14:
ii. 20).
Cap 14.— Of Christis Preisthood.
Q. Quhairin is Christ a preist ?
A. In offering his bodie on the crosse for us and
in pleading for us.
Q. How manie things ar wee to learne in this offering ?
A. Two, first how the sacrifice was prepared,
nixt how it was offered.
Q. How prepared Christ himself ?
A. He sanctified himself for
our cause, and
186
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* bound.
t i.e. pity.
ti.e. not.
§ Perhaps for
discharge, or
for change.
obeyed the law as our cautioner, and suffered manie
trowbles in this lif. — Joh. xvii. 19.
Q. Quhen began he his obedience ?
A. Quhen he was circumcised the eighth day
after his birth.
Q. Quhy was he circumcised .?
A. Because he maid himself a debtor to the
quhole law, and to let us see he was Abraham's
Sonne and the Saviour of the Jews.
Q. Quhy was he presented to the temple as other
infantis and offered ane offering ?
A. That by his Spirit wee might offer ourselvis
as holie to the Lord.
Q. Quhy was he baptised .?
A. Not for sinne, bot in tokin he boond * himself
to the covenant for us, and to let us see our dignitie
quhen wee and he ar both stamped with ane mark.
Q. Quhat trowble suffered he for us .?
A. He was borne poore, his lif sought in the
cradle, tempted of Sathan, and hated of the world.
Q. Quhy suffered he all this 1
A. To sanctifie all troubles to us, and that he
might pittief and help us under our temptationes.
Q. Bot seeing wee read not that he was seiJc, he hes
not tasted of all troubles for us ?
A. Howbeit he was noj seik, zet his holie bodie
was sore, and tormented with hunger, thrist, weari-
nes, wounds, and scourging.
Q. Hoio was Christ called to be a preist ?
A. By Godis oath, to let us see his Father was so
weel pleased, that by death he should never chairg§
him from his office.
Q. Quhat offered Christ for us .?
A. His owne lif upon the crosse through the
power of his Godhead.
J
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
187
■* curtains.
•j- Perhaps
ruddy tint or
gleam of light.
Let. 291.
Arminians
object this.
X foundati'on-
stone.
Let. 248.
Q. Christ then was not a naked sufferer in his death ?
A. No, howbeit the humanitie suffered, yet the
divine natur did give as it wer out of his hand the
flesh and blood of God.
Q. Then the Godhead did worTc in his suffering 2
A. Yea, indeed, the Godhead maid the offer, and
as the gold in the tabernacle glancing upon the
purple and skarlet courteanes* did cast a excellent
luster, so the glorie of the Godhead did cast a scaddf
and wonderful luster upon the blew and reed woonds
of dieing Christ.
Q. Quhy died Christ upon the crosse ?
A. Because that was a cursed death (Deut.
xxi. 23), and therfor Christ wold be maid a curse
for us cursed sinners (Deut. xxvii. 26- Gal. iii.
10).
Q. PFas ther no other curs their upon Christ hot that
ceremoniall curs c/;^ is wpon all that ar hanged .?
A. Yea, the curse due to all the elect for the
break of the law was upon him. — Gal. iii. 10.
Q. Was ther anie necessitie that Christ should die ?
A. Ether he or wee must die, because God did
never forgive debtis for nothing at all, and he
behoved to mak a testament to leive us his blissing.
— Heb. ix.
Q. Was it righteousnes to put Christ to death (wlw
never sinned) for us ?
A. Yea, indeed, because Christ offered himself
willing as cautioner for us (Psal. xl. 7 ; Heb. x. 7),
and his Father accepted him as cautioner (Isa. liii. 6).
Q. Then Christ's having our natur common to all
mankijnd maheth him not a Saviour who died for all
mankynd.
A. No, indeed, but Christ's act of cautionary in
God's good pleasur, so standing for many by nam,
and for no moe, is the ground-stone J of our salvation.
188
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* liaply,
perchauce.
tie. sting.
Q. Bot how know ye that Christ stood in our roome
quhen he died ?
A. The scriptures sayth he is our cautioner, and
that he died and was brused for our sine (Rom. v. 8 ;
1 Joh. iii. 1 6 ; Joh. xv. 1 3), and that he paid a
ransome such as is given for captives that ar not
able to pay for themselves (Mat. xx. 28).
Q, Quhat other reasone bring ye for this ?
A. If Christ died for all, so they may happilie*
suffer for their sinne in hell, God shall be unjust in
punishing Christ for their sinnes and in punishing
those same sinnes in hell.
Q. Bot wee gave Christ no commission to stand in our
roome 2
A. Quhen wee belleeve in Christ wee allow and
say Amen to the commission that his Father gave
him, quho gave him a ransome for us all.
Q. Bot quhy should wee die if Christ died for us ?
A. We ar delivered from sinne, q^^ is deathis
stignef (1 Cor. xv.), and ar no lesse delivered from
death then a man is delivered from a serpent quhen
the sting is taken from it.
Q. Quhat is the fruit of Christ's death ?
A. He lies satisfied God's justice and his law,
and obteaned pardone and everlasting lif to us.
Q. Quhat suffered Christ in his hodie for us ?
A. Thrist, sweating of blood, spitting, scourging,
peircing, and wounding on head, face, syd, handis,
and feet, and at last death.
Q. Quhat suffered he in his soull ?
A. Godis wraith, q'^ was a'verie hell to Christ.
Q. Quhy did Christ jpray that the cui:>p might he
removed ?
A. The human natur without sinne or dispair
did plead for itself, submitting itself to Godis will.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
189
Q. Quhy compleaned he that God had forsahin him .?
A. Because his soule being drowned in sore sad-
nes and sorrow throw* want of a sight of the God-
head, that covered itself as the sunne under a cloud,
and fear of Godis curse for our sinnes, could not see
God as he was wont to doe.
Q. Quhy went he downe to the grave ?
A. To let us see he was in death's handis, and to
sanctifie the grave to us.
Q. Bot is not Christ offered dailie in the masse ?
A. No, the scripture sayeth he was bot once
offered, and died bot once (Heb. ix.), otherwyse his
sacrifice wer unperfit.
Cap. 15.— Of Christis Intercession.
Q. Quhat is the other pairt of Christis preesthood ?
A. His interceeding at Godis hand for us.
Q. Quhat ar the steppis to this work ?
A. His rising the thrid day and his ascending up
to heavin.
Q. How is it knowne that Christ rose againe ?
A. Ffyve hundreth brethren saw him at once,
angells did bear witnes, men and women did see
him and hear him, touch him with their handis, and
eat with him.
benefits have wee hy his rising agane ?
A. Wee know he is a perfit saviour quhom cor-
ruption and death could not bind (Psal. xvi. 10;
A.cts ii. 24), and that by him wee ar both maid new
creatures in this lif (Col. iii. 1), and shall be raised
to glorie in the lif to come (1 Cor. xv. 22, 23).
Q. Quhy ascended he to heavin ?
A. To the end, that as our high preist he might
190
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* Perhaps our
complaints
and our peti-
tions.
tie. No.
No.
%i.e. pledge.
goe and stand for us in his royall garments before
his Father, to keep and receive our billis and our
suitis,* and present them in his Father's hands, and
send downe his Spirit to prepare us for the kingdome,
and to prepare the kingdome to us. — Joh. xiv. 2 ;
Joh. xvi.
Q. Bot is not Christ's hodie now everie q''
his
A. Not ;f in the power of his Spirit and Godhead
he is in all places, and present with his kirk to the
end, bot the manhead of Jesus must be conteined in
heavin till the last day. — Mat. xxviii. 20 ; Acts
iii. 21.
Q. Quhat is his place of glorie now in heavin ?
A. He sittetli at Godis right hand.
Q. Bot hes God handis or feet as mortall men hes 2
A. Not ; X bot it is a speach borrowed at kings,
quho placeth the greatest courteours at their right
hand. — 1 Kings ii. 19.
Q. Quhat is the meaning of it .?
A. Christ is now declared to be equall with God,
equall in glorie with the Father and Spirit q^as the
vail of the flesh did before hid his glorie, and the
man Christ is nixt to him above man and angell. —
Phil. ii. 7, 8, 9, 10.
Q. Quhat comfort have wee in this ?
A. Wee have a friend in the court of heavin able
and willing to doe for us, quho hes a pledge of ours,
our flesh and blood, and hes given us to paund§ of
his, his Spirit.
Q. Quhy sayth Stevin that he standeth at God's right
hand ?
A. He is said to sitt because now he restis from
his sufi'ering, and to stand because he is readie to
tak vengence on his enemies.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
191
Chap. 20.
Chap. 21.
* moro.
Cont. Pap.
affirmeth that
all that pvo-
fesseth Christ
ar of the kirk.
t chaff.
Cap. i6.
Q. Hitherto of redemption purchased to us quho
applyeth this redemption ?
A. The holie Spirit, true God, equall with the
Father and the Sonne, quho maketh us holie as God
is holie.
Cap, 17.— Of the Kirk.
Q. Quhome to is the redemption applyed ?
A. To all to quhome it is bought, and to no moe.*
Q. Bot hes not Christ dyed for all ?
^. No; bot onlie for his sheep (Joh. x. 11), his
kirk (Eph. v. 25), and his brethren (Heb. ii. 11).
Q. Then the end of Christ's death is not to please God
and oppin a dore to hevin, howbeit through unheleef no
man may enter ?
A. Nay, Christ bought us not onlie from our
sins, bot also from our vain conversation (1 Pet. i.
18, 19), that we should live unto God (1 Pet. ii. 24 ;
2 Cor. V. 15), otherwise Christ shall be bot half a
Saviour.
Q. Quhat is the church ?
A. The Lordis holie ones ether triumphing in
heavin or fighting on earth.
Q. Quhat is the church upon earth ?
A. It is Godis people chosen to lif everlasting,
and called by his Word and Spirit from sinne to
grace and glorie. — Mat. xvi. 18.
Q. Ar the wicked and reprobat of the kirk ?
A. They ar not of the kirk, bot in the kirk, as
cafFf is among the corne, bot is not corne, and as all
that is in the drawnet is not fish. — Mat. xiii.
Q. Quhy is the kirk called catholic ?
A. Because, quhile the world endureth in all
places, and of all nations and persons, God hes a
kirk.
192
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Cont. with
Papists,
quhitlier or no
the true kirk
is alwayes in
this life visi-
ble.
*i.e. wooden.
Let. 225.
Q. Quhy is the kirk called holie ?
A. Because Godis image is begunne in them in
this lif, and they ar clothed with Christ's righteous-
nes.— 2 Tim. i. 9 ; Joh. xiv. 26 ; 1 Pet. i. 5 ; Deut.
xiv. 2.
Q. Is the kirk alwayis visible and may he scene with
our eyes ?
A. The catholick kirk commeth not within our
senses, and the kirk of the elect beleeving in Christ
is beleeved with faith bot not seene with our eyes. —
Eom. ii. 29; 2 Tim. ii. 19.
Q. Quhat call yee then the visible kirk ?
A. A congregatione of Godis people that opinlie
professeth Godis name befor the world.
Q. Bot may the kirk alwayes be seene .?
A. It may alwayes be seene, howbeit all, evin the
beleevers, have not eyes to see it ; at such tyme as
the kirk for persecution is lik the moone hid under
a cloud. — Eev. xii. 6 : Eom. xi. 2, 3, 4.
Q. Quhat ar the marks of the true kirk 2
A. The true kirk heareth the voyce and the word
of the sheapheard, Christ (Joh. x. 27), and followeth
him.
Q. Bot it is als hard to know that mark of the true
word as to knoio the kirk ?
A. Nay ; bot those that ar Godis people indeed
knowes the kirk by the word, and no the word by
the kirk, evin as the armie of a king is knowne by
the colours and ensigne.
Q. Bot how shall the ivicked and unbeleevers, as
Turks and Paganes, know the kirk ?
A. They can no mor in the stat of unbeleef know
perfitlie the true kirk than a tree* hand can touch or
feel heat or cold in the bodie, howbeit the living
hand can do both.
THE SOIBIE OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
193
Q. Then rtwn must have faith to beleeve Godis Word
hefoT they can know the true kirk ?
A. Yea, certainlie, seeing the true kirk is a nura-
ber that beleevis Christ's word, men must have faith
to beleeve the word ere they know the true kirk.
Q. Can the kirk erre from the faith and fall away
from Christ ?
A. The catholick kirk of the elect beleevers can
never erre from Christ in maters necessarie for sal-
vatione, bot particular kirks may both erre and fall
away from Christ. — Rom. xi, 20 ; Rev. ii. 5.
Q. May the doctors of the kirk gathered togidder in a
generall counsall err from the faith ?
A. They may erre from the faith (Mat. xxvi. 3, 4;
Jer. ii. 26, 27, 28, and v. 3, vi. 14 ; and Isa. i. 5, 6 ;
Joh. ix. 22 ; Jer. xxvi. 8), and yet God shall ever
have a kirk against quhom the portis* of hell cannot
prevaill (Mat. xvi. 18), because all the kirk cannot
be gathered togedder in a counsall.
Q. Quher was the true kirk lefore M. Luther did
ryse .?
A. It was groaning under the youkf of Poperie,
and manie did opinlie avow Christ, otheris through
infirmitie lurked for fear of persecution, as they do
yet in Spaine, in Italie, and in Roome.
Cap. i8.
-Of the Officemen and the Power
OF Godis Kirk.
Q. Quhat officemen did Christ ordain in the Old
Testament for the building of the kirk ?
A. Some befor the people cam out of Egypt, and
some after they cam out.
Q. Quho wer officemen hefor their comming out of
Egypt?
A. The first borne and eldest brother was priest,
to instruct and rule the rest, except for sinne God
had rejected him.
N
194
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Q. Quhat is (he dignitie of the first borne ?
A. He was lord and king over his brethren (Gen.
xxvii. 29); secondlie, he had the double portion;
3, he was holie to the Lord (Numb. iii. 13).
Q. Quhat officemen wer in the kirk after the comming
out of Egyjpt ?
A. Preists, Levites, and propheits.
Q. How manie sorts of preists wer ther ?
A. Two, the high preist and the preist of the
under-rank, both of Aaron's sonnis.
Q. Quhat was the high preist' s speciall cJmrge ?
A. He asked Godis counsall by Urim and Thum-
mim (Ex. xxviii. 30), and went in to the holie of
holies once in the year in his royall garments, with a
basen of blood in his hand (Lev. xvi. 1 . . . 30).
Q. Quhat meaned that 2
A. In this he was a type and figure of Christ,
quho hes told us Godis counsall anent our salvatione,
and quho in glorie ascendit to heavin, and ther, by
vertue of his blood, pleadeth for us. — Heb. ix. 23,
24, 25. J
Q. Was ther any cheef preist lot one 1 "
A. Non by Godis appoyntment bot one, howbeit
after, by corruption, ther wer moe at once. — Mark
xiv. 53.
Q. Quhat wer the preests of the under rank ?
A. They were Aaron's sonnes, divided in twenty-
four ranks, quho by lot everie one after ane other
did sacrifice and burne incense to the Lord, and
teach the people Godis will (Mai. ii. 7), and blisse
the people, praying for them (Num. vi. 23 ; Deut.
xxi. 5 ; 2 Chron. xiii. 1 2).
Q. Qahat wer the Levites 1
A. The sonnes of Levi that served the preest in
(
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
195
the temple, and carried the tabernacle, and served in
the sacrificing (2 Chron. xxxv. 10, 11 ; Num. iii.
5 . . . 43).
Q. How many ranks of Levites wer ther ?
A. Four — 1. Som that did serve and carie the
tabernacle and the ark; 2. some that wer singers,
that on instruments of musick did sing and praise
God(l Chron. xxv. l,and vi. 32) ; 3. some wer porters
that did keep the doores of Godis house, and held
out the uncircumcised ; 4. some scribes and judges,
quho read and exponed the law.
Q. Quhat wer then the Nethinims or Gibeonites ?
A. They wer in Joshua his tyme appoynted to
serve the Levites in hewing wood and drawing
water for the house of God. — Josh. ix. 23 ; Ezra ii.
70.
Q. Quhat wer the propheites ?
A. They wer men of God raised up to foretell
secreetis and things to come, and to preach repent-
ance to the i^eople, and forgivenes of sinnes in Christ
quho was to come.
Q. Quhat wer then the Nazarites ?
A. They wer persones quho ether for one tyme
(Num. vi. 2; Acts xxi. 23) or for all their lif did
seperat themselves to the Lord. — Judg. xiii. 7 ;
1 Sam. i. 22.
Q. Quhat ofkemen ar in the New Testament ?
A. Some ar especiallie teachers and planters of
the kirk, others helpis in government.
Q. Quhat ar the officemen in the New Testament that
laboureth in teaching ?
A. Some wer extraordinarie, and to remaine for a
tyme, as apostles, propheits, and evangelists ; others
ordinarie, to indure to the end of the world, as
I doctors and pastors.
190
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* Perhaps
for mind.
t manners.
X She.
Q. Quhat tver the apostles ?
A. The ambassadoures of Christ, sent through all
the world to plant kirks, quho could not erre, had
the gift of tongues, and confirmed their doctrine
with miracles (Joh. xv. 27 ; Mat. xxviii. 19 ; Acts i.
8 ; viii. 1 4), and giving of the holie Spirit.
Q. Quhat tver propheits ?
A. Such as exponed the deepe mysteries of the
Word and knew secrets, speaking to the present
estait of the conscience. — 1 Cor. xiv. 25.
Q. Quhat wer evangelists ?
A. Such as the apostles used for the watering and
confirming of the kirks that they had planted.
Q. Quhat ar doctors ?
A. Such as expone the Word of God, and do in-
forme the word* in knowledge.
Q. Quhat ar pastors ?
A. Such as by preaching and exhorting labour
upon men's heartis and affections to mak them love
and obey the treuth.
Q. Quhat ar the helpis in government ?
A. Elders to oversee the meanersf of the people,
and deacons to keep and distribute the kirk goods
to the poore.
Q, Quhat is the power of the kirk .?
A. Shoe I hes authoritie given by her husband,
Christ, to hold out the word of treuth, and to appoynt
such officers as Christ hes ordained in his Word quho
should feed and rule the kirk after that maner set
down in the Word.
Q. Quherin standeth this power ?
A. In binding and loosing sinners, and oppining
and shutting heavin by the keyes committed to hir.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
197
Anathema
Marauatha.
Q. How is heavin oi?;pined and shut ?
A. By the preaching of the AVord mercie is pro-
mised to repenting sinners, and they ar admitted to
partak of the prayers of the kirk and sealles of the
covenant of grace ; and wraith is denunced against
the wicked and oppin offenders, and they ar ex-
communicated from the kirk, the prayers, and
sacraments.
Q. Ar all offenders to be excommunicat ?
A. No, bot onlie publique offenders, and such as
ar admonished of their sinne and refuseth to hear
the kirk. — Mat. xviii. 17.
Q. How many sorts of excommunication ar ther ?
A. Two, one medicinal! for the destroying of the
bodie of sinn (1 Tim. i. 20), ane other vindicative,
qlk is ane utter accursing of uncorrigible offenders
evin till Christ come. — 1 Cor. xvi. 22.
Q. Quhom to lies God committed the 'poiuer of excom-
municatione ?
A. To the quhole kirk of the faithful gathered
togidder in the name and authoritie of Christ, the
pastor in name of the kirk pronouncing the sentence,
or rather declaring the kirk's sentence. — 1 Cor. v.
4,5.
€ont. with
Pap. aneut the
kirk's power of
forgiving of
sinnes, if ju-
dicial! or decla-
rative onlie,
and quither
the Pope's in-
dulgences ar
lawful! or not.
Q. Hes the kirk any ijower to give pardones ?
A. They may remitt some things of the outward
satisfaction (2 Cor. ii. 7), and declare that sinnes
ar pardoned, as the king's herauld declareth a traitour
to bee the king's man, bot God onlie pardoneth
sinne.
Q. How hes the kirk power to mak laives ?
A. They have power to hold out and expone Godis
law by Godis law ; bot the kirk actis doth not bind
the conscience.
198
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Power of
kirk.
Things
indifferent.
Q. Quhat poiuer lies the, kirJc in outward government ?
A. Poyntis needfull in government ar fullie and
clearlie sett downe in Godis Word. — Deut. xii. 32 ;
Prov. XXX. 5, 6 ; Heb. ii. 3 ; Isa. vi. 9; xxii. 22 ;
Ps. XXV. 6 ; ex. 2 j Actis and Epistles to Tim. and
Titus, and Joh, xv. 15.
Q. Quhat is the kirk's power in things indifferent ?
A. The kirk hes hir power to mak constitution es,
bot following the golden rule of charitie and decencie
and pietie,
Q. Then things indifferent ar not properlie the matter
of kirk lawes ?
A. No indeed, they must losse the natur of things
indifferent, and become good, seemlie, and agreeable
to edificatione befor thay can be inacted as lawes.
Q. Bot may not manes rule and the authoritie of
governours inak things indifferent to be good and law-
full ?
A. Onlie Godis will maketh all things in the
world good and lawfull or badd and unlawfull ; man's
will and authoritie doth onlie come after, and com-
mand good and forbid evill.
Q. Quhat is the magistratis potver in kirk matters ?
A. In so farr as he is a Christiane, he hes power
with the kirk as a member in the bodie to work
with [the] kirk ; in so far as he is a magistrat he
should assist the kirk for the punishing of ofifenders,
and countenance good lawes with his authoritie.
Q. Bot is not the power of government in the handis
of the Christian magistrat ?
A. No, it is in the kirk, the spouse of Christ,
under hir husband and lord.
Q. Quho is the head and cheef ruler of the quhole
kirk ?
A. Christ onlie, who is the king of the kirk. —
Col. i. 18; Eph. i. 22.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
199
Q. QuJmt is then Peter's i^lace or the Foipe of Roome
in the kirk ?
A. Peter received no authoritie above the rest of
the apostles, bot he and all other faithfull pastors
hes equallie received the keyes of the kingdome of
God, and the Pope is that antichrist. — 2 Thess. ii.
Q. Quhat is then the kirk of Roome ?
A. The mother kirk of spirituall quhoordome, ane
harlott, not Christ's spouse.
Cap. 19.
Q. Hitherto of the pairties to quhome the redemption
is apphjed, quhat is the loay hoiv it is applyed ?
A. Christ by his Spirit bestoweth on his kirk in
this lif the communion of saintis and forgivenes of
sinnes, and in the lif to come the rising of the body
and lif everlasting.
Q. Quhat is th& communion of saintis ?
A. The fellowship of Godis people by faith with
Christ and his Spirit, and the knitting togidder of
Godis people among themselves in love.
Q. Hoiv moMe imtjes doth Godis Spirit mak us one
with Christ ?
A. Twoe wayes, by inward sanctificatione or re-
generatione, and by justification in his blood.
Q. Quhat is sandiflcation ?
A. It is the work of Godis Spirit by the Word,
putting in us the lif of Christ and renewing all the
powers of our soul.
Q. Quhat is Godis proper ivork heir ?
A. He calleth us by the Word outwardlie, and in-
fuseth in us grace to obey the calling, c[^^ is his
inward calling.
200
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Inward and
outward call.
Contraversie.
Contro. with
Arm. and
Papists, if any
cause or dispo-
sition he in our
freewill befor
our conver-
sion.
Q. At all called inwardlie by the power of Godis Spirit
that ar outivardlie called ?
A. No, God calletli manie by his Word quho
remaineth still in ignorance and darknes, and liveth
to be fettered in their sinnes.
Q. From quhome cor)imeth it that manie ar outwardlie
called^ and yet never maid new creatures q'^as others does
obey ?
A. The onlie good pleasur of God by his Spirit
draweth the children of election, and causeth them
to come of his free grace, and leaveth others to their
owne hardnes of heart and rebellion — Mat. xi. 25,
26 ; Mat. xvi. 17, 18 ; Joh. vi. 44; Acts xvi. 14 ;
Acts xiii. 48.
Q. Bot quhen wee ar inwardlie called by Godis Spirit,
may wee not resist Godis calling and hinder our conver-
sion ?
A. Wee ar naturalie inclyned to resist Godis call-
ing, bot the omnipotent power of God that rayseth
the dead worketh so graciouslie in the elect that
they must run when God draweth them. — Cant. i. 3 ;
Joh. vi. 45; Eph. i. 18, 19.
Q. Then it is in vain for us to hear the Word if nothing
bot Godis mightie power maketh us new creatures ?
A. It is not a vain thing for the seaman to wait
on, howbeit God onlie maketh tyd and wind, nor for
the husbandman to till and harrow, howbeit God
onlie maketh the corne to grow.
Q. Do wee nothing before wee ar maid new creatures
to help the work 2
A. Nothing of ourselves to move God to call us
inwardlie, q^^ the reprobat may not do also, for of
grace God calleth us, not of works. — Tit. iii. 4, 5.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
201
Cont. with
Arm. and
Papists, if free
will doth co-
operate and
work with God
in the work of
our conver-
sion.
p-eparatione hefor Godis
Q. Then ther goeih no
effectuall calling ?
A. Yes, God casteth us downe with the terrours
of the law, making us see our miserable estait. —
Acts ix. 6 ; ii. 37.
Q. Doe wee not helj) God and work with him in the
work of our new birth ?
A. Not at all, for in the first moment of our new
birth wee lie as dead men under Godis Spirit, who
infuseth in us the lif of God, bot quhen he lies maid
us new creatures wee walk willinglie and cheerful lie.
Q. Row may a man know that God hes maid him a
new creatur ?
A. 1. If he be willing to obey God in all things, and
for the love of God renounce all sinnes (Acts ix. 6 ;
ii. 37; Ps. xl. 8, 9; cxix. ; James ii. 10)j 2. if
his love to Godis Word be great (1 Pet. ii. 2 ; Ps.
cxix. 3) ; 3. if he love the brethrene (1 Joh. iii. 14) ;
4. and the Spirit of God in him fight against the
flesh,
Q. Bot in naiurall men the conscience will speak
against sinn, and they sinne not without a combat in
their soidl 2
A. I. Bot the naturall man his conscience speaketh
not against him in all sinnes, but onlie in heynous
offences. 2, They goe on in dailie sinning. 3. With
the combat they have a delight to serve sinne. 4.
They onlie at some tymes holdes downe sinn as a
fire covered under ashes, and seeketh not to slay
their lusts ; and none of those ar in Godis child.
Q. Quhaf ar the pairtis of sanctification .?
A. In remooving of the stonnie heart and slaying
of sinne, and a quickening of us to love righteous-
nes. — Ezek. xxxvi. 26, 27.
202
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Chap. 24.
Of Papists'
satisfaction
and aiiricular
confession.
Q. Holo is the stonnie heart removed .?
A. For the merit of Christ's death God slayeth
sinne, and maketh (us) out of sorrow against our
sinne that slew Christ, and out of love to Jesus who
died for us, hate and loathe our sinne, so that
sorrow and love ar the nails that crucifieth the bodie
of sinne. — Eom. vi. 6 ; Gal. v. 24 ; Eom. vi. 4 ;
viii. 13 ; 1 Joh. iv. 11 ; 2 Cor. v. 14.
Q. HoiD ar we quickened to newnes of lif?
A. Christ rising from the death lies merited to us
newnes of lif, and his Spirit that raised him the
thrid day, that death might have no dominion over
him, and that he might ascend to heavin, doth
quickin us to live to God and seek the things that
ar above at Christ's right hand. — Rom. viii. 11 ;
Rom. vi. 9, 10 ; Col. iii. 1 ] Phil. iii. 10.
Cap. 20.— Of Repentance.
Q. Hoiv doe we answeere Godis outward calling ?
A. By repentance and faith.
Q. Quhat is repentance ?
A. Godlie sorrow for sinne (2 Cor. vii. 10 ; Ps. li.
17) wrought in us by the holie Spirit (Zach. xii. 10 ;
Acts V. 31 j xi. 15 ; 2 Tim. ii. 25), and forsaking of
our evill wayes (Isa. Iv. 7 ; Ezech. xviii. 31), and a
turning unto God (Jer. iii. 1 ; xxxi. 8) with all our
heart (Joel ii. 12).
Q. How worJceth God repentance in us 1
A. His Spirit accompanying the law maketh us
see that wee ar closed under damnation, and the
gospell maketh us seek to Christ for mercie.
Q. May wee satisfie God for our sinnes ?
A. We may and should satisfie men quhen wee
offend them, bot ther is no habilitie ether by doing
or suffering to satisfie God, Christ onlie hes done
that. — 1 Joh. i. 8.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
203
Chap. 25.
* ye or you.
t i.e. guessing.
ti.e. by him-
self.
§ i.e. bag or
wallet.
Against
Papists qo
maketh faith
bot a naked
assent to Godis
Word.
Cap. 21.— Of Faith.
Q. Quhat is faith ?
y^. It is ane assurance of knowledge that Christ
cam into the world to die for sinners (1 Tim. i. 15 ;
Col. ii. 2), and a resting and a hanging upon Christ
with all the heart for salvation (Joh. iii. 33 ; i. 12;
1 Tim. i. 15 ; Isa. x. 20 ; Eom. v. 2).
Q. Quhy call zee^ faith ane assurance of knowledge ?
A. Because it is no faith, bot a blind gessingf to
beleeve as the kirk beleeveth quhen wee know not
quhat wee beleeve. — 1 Cor. i. 21 ; Isa. liii. 11 ; Joh.
vi.
iv.
69 ; Jer. xxxi. 34 ; 2 Cor. v. 1 ; iii. 18 ; 1 Cor.
6.
Q. Quhy call ze faith a leaning and hanging ujjon
God?
A. Because it is not enough to salvatione to be-
leeve that God is true in his Word.
Q. HoiD prove ze that ?
A. Because faith is a leaning upon God (Isa. x.
20 ; Ps. xxxvii. 5 ; xxii. 8), as if ane sinner wer
ane lamed man quho cannot stand his alon jj bot
must leane upon Christ as his staff and hold, and a
comming to Christ (Mat. xi. 28 ; Joh. vi. 37), as a
wearied traveler to ane innes, quher he casteth down
his bilget.§
Q. Bot is not faith to beleeve quhat God saith is true ?
A. Yea, that is not all ; wee must beleeve also the
goodnes of the promeis, as a condemned man upon
the scaffold beleeveth in the king's clemencie and
grace quhen he sees the sealed pardone, q^as the
hearts of other beholders ar not so touched and
moved as his heart is.
Q. Must I, for my imirt, believe that Christ died for
me ?
A. Yea, certainlie, bot zow must first hang upon
him as a merciful! Saviour befor zow come to that.
204
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* lay hold of
you.
tie. stoop or
i»ow down.
1 i. e. insipid.
Let. 182.
Q. Bot because Christ died not for all., how shall I
know if it he his hidden purpose to die for me ?
A. Try your owne purpose first, and not Christ's
purpose first ; if your heart cleave unto him as a
half drowned man grippes to a strong tree growing
upon the brink of the water, and so can hold be
him, he cannot bot gripp zow.*
Q. Bot is it not presumption for me to apply Christ
as myne owne hefor I he assured quhither he is myne or
not?
A. If in humilitie thinking baselie of yourself and
highlie of Christ zee come and tak possessione, pos-
sessione is right good enough.
Q. Mak that more plaine to me.
A. A king maketh a supper upon purpose to feed
the hungrie, he scattereth gold amongst a number of
beggares, it is not meet that tyme the hungrie and
the begger say, I know not the king's mynd con-
cerning me, bot lett every man stepp to and eat and
loutjf and gather the king's gold.
Q. Bot then may not all, the elect and reprohat, heleeve
that Christ died for them ?
A. As the lamb, by the instinct of natur, knoweth
its mother amongst a hundreth so soone as it is
borne, soe everie one borne of God, by ane secreet
instinct of grace knoweth Christ to bee his OAvne,
q^'^ the reprobat cannot doe ; they ar ever dry and
wearshj in their heart aifectiones toward Christ.
Q. Then the reprohat ar not ohlished to heleeve that
Christ died for them ?
A. No, they are oblished to rest upon Christ with
all their heart for salvatione, q^"^ they cannot doe.
Q. Hes not temporarie faith the nature of true faith
emn as ane infant that livcth ane day hes the nature of
man in him 2
^. No.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
205
Q. Quhy so ?
A. Because their heart is evill and stonnie ground
(Mat. xiii. 20); that joy and faith is not rooted and
grounded upon the authoritie of God, hot upon ease
and honour, that accompanieth the gospell.
Q. HoiD far may reprobats go on the ivay to heavin '<
A. They may know the heavinlie doctrine by the
power of the holie Spirit, and find some sweetnes y' *
pleaseth nature thereinto, and desire heavin (Num.
xxiii. 1 4 ; Heb. vi. 4), and reforme their lif in many
things (Mark vi. 20), and sorrow for sinnes (Ex.
ix. 27).
Cap. 22.— Of Justification.
Q. Quhat is justification ?
A. It is the gracious sentence of the judge of the
world esteeming beleeving sinners to be pardoned
and righteous for the satisfaction of Christ their
cautioner, quho died for them.
Q. Quhat is the principall cause moving God to justifie
sinners ?
A. His free grace accepting and counting Christ
as our cautioner, not being moved ether for our good
works or for faith.
Q. Hoiv can the righteousnes of ane other man, such
as Christ is, mak us righteous, for the quhytnes in ane
swane'f or snow cannot mak the wall quhyt ?
A. Christ is not ane other man heir, bot he is the
cautioner and we the poor divers, J and the diver is
free by the law if the cautioner pay.
Q. Quhat ar then our good works done by the grace of
Godis Sj)irit ?
A. No causes at all of our justification (Eom. iv..
18, 19, 20), bot onlie fruittes of our faith.
206
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Faith.
,e. account.
Q. Is not our faith ane cause of justification .?
^. It is the hand that layeth hold upon the right-
eousnes of Christ and draweth Christ in to us.
Q. Doth not God justifie us for our faith, or is faith
any cause or instrument upon Godis pairt ?
A. Non at all, for God, beholding Christ dieing
upon the crosse, doth esteeme and reckin all the elect
righteous as if they had satisfied him fullie.
Q. Then in Godis compf* the elect ar justified and
freed from their sinnes long ere they beleeve ?
A. Yea, certainlie, evin as ane earl's sonne the
first night he is borne is a lord, howbeit he nether
knoweth of it, nether doth he possess the lordship.
Q. Quhat then is the work of faith ?
A. It maketh the conscience of the sinner to rest
upon crucified Christ for righteousnes, and is all that
God requireth of us in justification.
Q. Then a naked faith without love, feare, hope, and
good works is enough for us ?
A. Not so, for as the eyes onlie sees, yet they
must be in the head, and with the face and eares, so
faith is conjoyned with all other graces, and yet
onlie faith doth lay hold on Christis righteousnes.
Q. Quhat ar the pairts of our justification ?
A. Two ; first the not reckoning or counting our
sinnes to be ours (Rom. iv. 8), and the counting of
Christ's righteousnes ours (2 Cor. v. 21).
Q. Bot is it not enough that our sinnes ar taken
away ?
A. Not; for to mak a diver a courteour with a
king both his debtis must be payed and he must
be maid rich and clothed in fair apparel.
Q. How of tin ar wee justified ?
A. Once onlie, howbeit the feeling of that mercie
must oftin be renewed.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
207
Q. Bot ar we justified from sinnes evin befor tue
committ them ?
A. In the work of justification God beholds
sinners as free from all their sinns, because Christ
in ane paper gave in all our debtis, and payed for
them, and cancelled and rent the handwriting of
the law against us upon the crosse. — Col. ii. 14, 15.
Q. Qulmj ar we commanded in the Word to heleeve, to
repent, to he holie, bot ar never commanded to be justi-
fied ?
A. Because God onlie and quhollie, without any-
work in us, justifieth us for his dear Sonnes saik.
Cap. 23.— Of Adoption.
Q. Quhat ar the fruittis of our justificatioune ?
A. Adoptione to ceartaintie of salvatione and
Christian libertie.
Q. Quhat is adoption ?
A. It is Godis reckoning and esteeming of us to
be sonnes after wee beleeve and ar reconciled unto
God.— Joh. i. 12 ; Eom. viii. 17, 29.
Q. How shall we know that we ar adopted 1
A. If we'can pray to our Father (Zach. xii. 10;
Eom. viii. 15, 26 ; Gal. iv. 6) ; if we be in fashione
lik our Father and our brother Christ (Mat. v. 48 ;
Eom. viii. 29), serving for the inheritance as heires,
not for the movables as slaves (Eom. viii. 17, 23).
Cap. 24.— Of Hope.
Q. Quhat ar the fruitis of our adoption ?
A. First, we may thereby hope for the inheritance
(Eom. viii. 23), and pray for it and to be ledd unto
it (Eom. viii. 15).
Q. Quhat is hope ?
A. Ane assured waitting of the soul for the glorie
that shall be revelled, evin under all troubles. —
Heb. vi. 11.
208
Of Hope.
Chap. 29,
* Invocation
of God.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Q. QuJiairfro arises hojye ?
A. Out of the feeling of Godis love toward us in
Christ.— Rom. v. 1, 2.
Q. Quhat ar the fruites that hope hringeth foorth ?
A. Patience (1 Thes. i. 3), joy (Heb. iii. 16),
and a care to be holie (1 Joh. iii. 3).
Cap. 25,— Of Prayer.
Q. Quhat is the other fruitt of adoption ?
A. It maketh us to pray and cry Abba Father
(Rom. viii. 15), as earthlie bairnes, because they ar
sonnes, seeketh all thingis they need from ther
father.
Q. Quhat is prayer ?
A. Ane humble incalling* upon God (Ps. 1. 21),
in faith (Jam. i. 6), in the nam of Christ (Joh.
xiii. 14), for all things that wee need, ether for our
salvation or Godis glorie.
Q. Quho should pray ?
A. All ar commanded to pray.
Q. Doth the saintis and angells pray for us ?
A. They praise God, and wisheth the day of
resurrection and the confusion of Godis enimies
(Rev. vi.), bot they know not our particular neces-
sities, nether air we to seek the aid of their prayers.
Q. Quhome to should we 'pray ?
A. To God onlie (Ps. 1. 21), and nether to sainctes
nor angells, seeing God will not give the glorie of
his worshipe to any bot to himself — Rom. x. 13, 14 ;
Jer. xvii. 5 ; Mat. iv. 1 0.
Q. Quhat is the best nde of prayer ?
■ A. The prayers of the sainctis in Godis Word,
especiallie that prayer that Christ hes taught us, q^^
is, Our Father q^^ art, etc.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
209
Q. Quhat ar the ijcdrtis of this pxiyer ?
A. It conteaneth six suittis,* three for his glorie,
and three for our own necessitie, and a thanksgiving.
Q. Quhat ar the pairtis of the first suitt ?
A. It sheweth to quhome the quhole prayer is
directed, and then the suitt is sett downe.
Q. Quherfor call ye God our father ?
A. Because wee ar to come with reverence and
faith in prayer, as bairnes to their fatheris knee,
with love to our brethren, and to speak to him in a
bairnes tongue quho hes maid us bairnes in Christ.
Q. Quhy call ye him Father in the heavins ?
A. Because we ar in humilitie to think of our-
selves as wormis and as strangeres upon earth, and
to trust in his power and reverence his glorie with
heavinlie myndis in prayer.
Q. Bot is not God in all places als weel as in heavln ?
A. Yea, he filleth heavin and earth, bot heavin is
called his house and throne because ther he sheweth
the fulnes of his glorie to sainctis and angellis.
Q. Quhat learne zee f of this ?
A. It is our pairt to sigh to be at home in his
house, seeing heer wee seem to be far from our lord.
Q. Quhat seek ye in the first petition, Hallowed he thy
name ?
A. We pray that God wold mak all men know
and glorifie him in his holie nature, word, and
works, and that we may glorifie him by a holie lif,
and that his enimies that dishonour him wer con-
founded.
Q. Bot can we mak Godis nam holier then it is ?
A. No, bot we ar admitted to that honour as to
hold our lord in his throne of glorie quhen the
wicked wold J pull him out of it and desire onlie
that his glorie may appear to all men.
210
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
• lengtli.
t where.
Q. Qithat meane zee by the second suitf, Thy Jcingdome
come ?
A. Heir, out of zeall to Godis glorie, we desire
that God wold gather a kirk; accompanying the
word, sacraments, and discipline with his holie Spirit
against the devill, the world, and the flesh, and that
at lenth * he wold come in glorie that his Christ may
be maried upon his kirk.
Q. Quhat seek ye in the fhrid ]jetition, Thy will he done ?
A. "Wee desire grace to deny our owne will and
carnall reasone, that we may submitt ourself to that
q^^ we know God lies decreed, and that we and all
others may obey his will in his word cheerfullie, as
the angellis in heaven serveth him.
Q. Quhat affection should we have in this jyetition ?
A. \, A. godlie sorrow that the Lord is angered by
our sinnes ; 2, our will in all troubles should with-
out quarelling of God rest upon his will ; 3, as
fettered prisoners wee should long to be qherf wee
shall sinne no more.
Q. Bot may it fall out that Godis will is not done ?
quho can fight against his will .?
A. His just decree shall stand for ever (Isa. xiv. ;
Ps. xxxiii.), bot sinners doth not his will in his
word, nether rest they allwayes upon his holie
decrees evin quhen they know them.
Q. Quhat difference is ther betwixt his decree and his
reveiled will in his Word ?
A. In his decree he setteth downe that q^^ he
will doe himself ; in his reveiled will and law he
setteth downe our duetie q^^ we should doe, bot
oftintyme we doe it not.
Q. Quhat seek zee in the fourth petition, Give us this
day, etc. ?
' A. AVee desire of God food and raiment, a bliss-
ing upon the labores of man and beast and lawfull
pleasures, that we may be helpit in our jorney to
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
211
weather.
t Neither what
we have
acquired nor
what we have
inherited.
heavin, blissed in health, sleep, and houses, good
magistrats, fair waither.*
Q. Qiihy say ze give us and not render us ?
A. Because we deserve nothing at Godis hand,
and nether our conqueis nor our birth,t hot onlie
Godis free gift maketh us a spirituall right to the
earth.
Q. Bot quhen our harnes and houses and the table is
fidl of meet, need wee then to pray ?
A. Yea, indeed, because God may curse our bread
and turne it into a stone, and they ar robbers quho
puttis their handis to Godis creaturis and seeke not
libertie by prayer from him.
Q. Quherfor say ye, This day ?
A. Because we should pray als oft as we ar
hungrie, and God will have us for the morrow to
trust in his j^rovidence.
Q. Qiihy seek ye nothing bot daily bread ?
A. Because our heartis should not run after
covetousnes, bot be content with our present meal
and food and raiment.
Q. Qiihy ar all the necessities of this lif called bread 2
A. Godis Word speaketh so to teach us to be
thankfuU for that o^^ sufficeth nature, and not to
seek for that (^^ doth please the desires of our sin-
full flesh.
Q. Quherfor call zee it our bread, seeing it is Godis
bread ?
A. Because we ar to labour for it in a lawfull
calling, els wee steill our breid and makis unjust con-
queis, and because it must ether be maid ouris in
Christ els wee robb God.
Q. Quhat is the meaning of the fyft j^etition, Forgive
us our sinnes ?
A. Out of love to forgive all men, evin our enimies,
and out of the felt weight of our confessed sinnes,'
212
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Chap. 30.
t removing.
wee desire God freelie for Christis saik to pardone
our sinnes and wash us in his blood. — Ps. li.
Q. Quhat seek zee in the last petition, Lead us not
into tentatione ?
A. Wee crave the increase of faith and grace, and
that wee may have strenth to stand against the
devill, sinne, and ail the troubles and the evill and
curs * in tentationes as being weak of ourselfis.
Q. Quhat meane zee ly the thanksgiving, For ihyne is
the kingdome, etc. ?
A. Wee praise God as our king, trusting he is
willing and pouerfull to help us, because the glorie
of our salvatione belongeth to him.
Q. Quhat meane ze hy the tvord Amen ?
A. It saith, I beleeve it shall be soe as I pray.
Cap. 26.— Of Fasting.
Q. How many sortis of prayer ar ther ?
A. Som ordinarie, at all tymes ; some extra-
ordinary, as fasting.
Q. Quhat is fasting ?
A. Ane abstinence from meat and drink and all
lawfull pleasures (Ex. xxxiii. 4, 5 ; Joel ii. 16), that
we may in bitterness of soull mourne for our sinne.
Q. Quhen should we fast ?
A. Not at sett tymes as Papists does, bot quhen
the bridegroome Christ is flitting,f and wee under
great sinnes. — Luk. v. 35.
Q. Quhen should wee pray ? ^
A. Not precislie at sett houres as Papistis doe,
bot at all occasions. — 1 Thes. v. 17.
• Q. Quher shoidd wee pray ?
A. In all places (1 Tim. ii. 8), not at the holie
grave as the Papistis doe.
I
I
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
213
Cap. 27.— Of the Certaintie of our Salvation.
Q. Quhat is the second fruit of our justificatioune ?
A. Our salvation is sure in itself, and wee may
be perswaded that it is sure.
Q. Quhat ar the groundis of our continuance in the
state of grace ?
A. Som groundis ar in God, som within ourselvis.
Q. Quhat groundis of assurance of salvatioune ar in
God ?
A. God hath decreed to save us (Joh. xvii. 2, 6 ;
vi, 37; Rom. viii. 29; xi. 7 ; Mat. xxiv. 24); we have
Godis pouer (Matt. x. 28 ; 1 Pet. i. 5), his promise
and covenant (Jer. xxxii. 40, 41), and oath (Heb.
vi. 17; Jer. xxxi. 35, 36, 37; Hosea ii. 19; Isa.
lix. 21), and Christ i)rayeth for us that our faith
faill not (Joh. xvii. 15 ; Heb. ix. 24 ; Joh. xi. 22).
Q. Quhat warrcmdis have we tvithin us ?
A. His Spirit dwelling in us to the end. — Joh.
xvi. 13; Ezech. xxxvi. 27; Joh. iv. 14; 1 Joh. iii. 9.
Q. Bot hes not God promised to keep us in grace upon
condition tJuit wee doe our 2Mirt ?
A. Yea, God hes promised to call us by his
grace to doe our pairt (Jer. xxxii. 40, 41), and so
fulfilleth both his pairt of the covenant and ouris.
Q. Bot may we not then sleepe and fold our handis
and commit all the cair to God of our salvatioune ?
^. It is a work of Godis Spirit, and a suire
meane of our continuance that God by his Spirit
maketh us carefull to work out our salvatione in
fear and trimbling. — Phil. ii. 13; Ps. i. 2; Luk.
viii. 15.
Q. How ar wee assured of our continuance in grace
in our owne conscience ?
A. Godis Spirit wdtnesseth with our spirit that
we ar Godis sonnes and heiris. — Rom. viii.
214
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* written.
t reneAved.
t repent.
Let. 125.
Q. Quhat is the witnes of Godis SjArit ?
A. It is the voyce of Godis Spirit accompanying
the Word, so speaking to the heart and making all
the promises of God to be myne as if the new
covenant wer ritten* and spokin to me by name.
Q. Quhat is the witnessing of our spirit ?
A. It is the knowledge and feeling that my
renuedf mynd and heart hes of Godis unchaingeable
love to me in Christ, as the wiff amongst a thousand
strangers knoweth hir husbandis voyce, howbeit
shoe cannot mak otheris know it as shoe doth. —
Cant. ii. 8.
Q. Bot quhat ar the toldns and the marks to your
soull that that knowledge beguileth zou not ?
A. I have joy as a man that hes found a treasure
(Acts viii. 39 ; 1 Pet. i. 8 ; Acts ix, 17), and wonder
quhy my God should love me rather then others
(Joh. xiv. 12; iv. 29; Acts ix. 21). I love and
desire Godis love to doe his will (Cant. v. 8 ; i. 7
Ps. cxvi. 12; 1 Joh. iv. 9; 2 Cor. v. 1, 2; Phil. ii. 2, 3)
prise this world at nothing for him (1 Pet. ii. 1 1
Mat. xiii. 44).
Q. Quhat is it then to receive earnest of God and to
be filled hv the spirit of promise unto the day of
redemption ?
A. Quhen God hes gevin me the graces of his
Spirit as a earnest pennie that I shall receive glorie,
and my soull is as a sealed and closed letter, stamped
with the image of Christ in all the power therof.
Q. Quhat is the fruit of this ?
A. I am persuadid that God will not rewj of his
bargane and losse his earnest pennie, and that
nothing can break up the king of heavin's great seall
and stamp.
THE SOmiE OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
215
Chap. 32.
* while, i.e.
until.
t reach or
attain.
I perhaps
gropeth, feel-
eth for.
Cap. 28. — Of Temptatiounes.
Q. Mmj not Goclis children fall into greevous sinnes ?
A. Yea, God leaving them they doe oftin fall, hot
the Lord putteth his hand undir them and raiseth
them again.
Q. Will they not both then and at other tymes doubt
of Godis favour ?
A. Yea, certainelie.
Q. Quhat should be our case under the conscience of
sinne, and absence of Godis favour ?
A. Wee should not give sleepe to our eyes q^®*
wee confess and repent, and should seek to the
covenant (Isa. liv. 7, 8) and mercie of God quho
cannot forgett us (Isa. xlix. 15).
Q. Bot at such tymes tvee cannot ivinn'f to that ?
A. Then, lik a man in a dark house quho cannot
see ether doore or window, but grippeth j to the doore
with his handis, wee should deeme weell of God,
still beleeve and runne to old experience both in
ourselvis and otheris.
Q. How may wee be comforted in afflictiones ?
A. If humbling ourselvis undir Godis hand (Jam.
iv. 1 ; 1 Pet. v. 6 ; 2 Sam. xv. 2 6), who stryketh
us (Isa. xxvi. 11; Job v. 6; Amos iii. 6), we
remember the good fruit of sanctified crosses (Ps.
cxix. 67 ; Hos. v. 15 ; 1 Pet. i. 7), and that thereby
we know wee ar lik the prince of our salvatioun
(Heb. ii. 18; iv. 1 5), and ar sonnes and not bastards
(Heb. xii. 7).
Q. Hoiu may wee overcome the icorld ?
A. By faith (1 Joh. v. 5), patience (Luk. xxi. 19),
a good conscience befor men. — Mat. v. 16; 1 Pet.
iii. 16.
Q. Hoio may lue overcome Sathan ?
A. We must put on Godis armour.
216
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* breast.
t i.e. rods
smeared with
birdlime.
X weak.
II hate.
§ i.e. on.
Chap. 33.
Q. Quhat is the armour of God ?
A. Eph. vi. 14 ; 1, the girdle or belt of treutli and
sinceritie in all wee doe ; 2, righteousnes and a good
conscience upon the breist* against all that sinne,
Sathan, and the world can say ; 3, our feet shodd
with the assurance of peace with God and a purpose
to goe to heavin through all thornes in our way ;
4, in the one hand faith, in the other Godis Word to
cut the knottis and cordis of sinne ; 5, hope upon
the head to look and wait for glorie.
Q. How ohteane ive this armour ?
A. By earnest prayer and watchin in all sobrietie.
Q. Row shall wee overcome temjytatlounes arysing
from our heart ?
A. If, having put on this armour wee slay the
thoughts of sinne in the birth, not setting downe
our affections upon them, because they ar lime
wandesf to walk J birds.
Q. Hoiv shall ivee know that temj^tations yrevails ?
A. If we delite, consent, and practise; bot if wee
resist and pray against them and hat|| them,howbeit
they draw us one,§ yet we shall overcome.
Cap. 29.— Of Christian Libertie.
Q. Quhat is the thr id fruit of justificatioun ?
A. Our Christian libertie.
Q. Quherin standeth our Christian libertie ?
A. In that we ar freed from the curse of the law
and sinne, and from the commandementis of men
and all ceremonies.
Q. Quhat is our libertie in things indifferent ?
A. We may use them or not use them, providing
we hurt not the conscience of other men. — Rom.
xiv. 13: 1 Cor. viii. 1 3.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
217
Cap.
30-
Q. Now having sioohin of redemption purchased and
apjjlyed in this lif, quhair shall our redemjytion be fidlie
A. In the last day, called for that cause the day
of redemption.
Q. Quhen will that day bee ?
A, God lies keepid the knowledge of it from us
to the end wee may watch and pray. — Mat. xxiv.
22 . . 36; Luk. xxi. 34-5 ; 1 Thes. v. 2-3.
Q. Bot qnhaf tokins goeth befor the last day ?
A. Menny* shall fall from the faith, and fals Christis
sliall aryse, men's love shall grow cold (Mat. xxiv.),
and ther shall be famine, blood, and pestilence.
Q. Quho shall be the judge ?
A. The man Christ (Acts x. 42; xvii. 31), for
our great comfort, seeing our cautioner shall sitt and
judge upon the debtis he payed himself.
Q. Quher sJmll he be first se'ens ?
A. To the eyis of all living he shall come with
thousands of augellis through the skyes, and shall
sitt in a great quhyt throne to expresse his greatnes
and uprightnes in judgment.
Q. Bot quhat shall he first doe ?
A. At his presence the earth and the works
therin shall be brunt with fire, the heavins shall
depairt away lik a skrooll,f and by the voyce of a
mightie angell and a shout, he shall rayse all the
dead.
Q. Quhat shall become of those that ar found alive at
his coming ?
A. They shall not die, bot be changed, q^^ shall
be to them instead of death.
Q. Quhat cloth he after that ?
A. He shall summond all natiounes befor him
218
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* I.e. range m
order.
Chap. 35.
+ i.e. who.
t pledge or
security.
(Mat. XXV. 40; Eev. i. 7), and rank* them, setting
the wicked on his left hand and the godlie on his
right hand.
Q. After quhat maner shall he proceed ?'
A. The book of Godis decree and the buik of
rememberance (Mai. iii.), and the buik of everie man's
conscience shall be opined, and everie one shall be
judged according to their works. — Kev. xx. 12.
Q. Quhat hUssings will Christ bestoiv upon his kirh ?
A. He shall raise the dead in Christ first, and
mak their bodies lik his owne glorious bodie, and
present them without sinne before him, and receive
them to himself. — Joh. xiv. 2, 3.
Q. Quhat shall he the state of the wicked ?
A. The judge shall say to them, Depairt ze cursed
into everlasting fire, prepared for the devill and his
angellis, and that shall be ther estait for evermore.
■ Cap. 31.— Of ye Sacramentis.
Q. Having spokin of the doctrine of faith, quhat are
the scales of this doctrine ?
A. The sacramentis that ar bodielie and out-
wardlie pledges of Godis grace.
Q. For quhat end was sacramentis ordained 2
A. To strenthen and confirme our staggering
faith.
Q. Quhat learne zee of this ?
A. Our Lord is mercifull and pitifull [to] his
bairnes q^f will not beleeve his oath and word
without a paund,J and that they ar damned who
refuseth God's paundis.
Q. Quho hes poivcr to ordaine a sacrament 2
A. Onlie Christ, quho hes pouer to giv and
promis grace, q^'^ is the soull of the sacramentis.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
219
Q. Qiihat is tJie end and fruitt of ane sacrament ?
A. It sealeth up our fellowship with Christ that
he giveth himself to us and that we promise to tak
Christ to be our redeemer, as he that receives chairter
and seall from the king receiveth landis and bindeth
himself to be the king's vassald.*
Q. Is ther any imvard vertue in the sacramentis quhair
[by], hoiubeit wee he sleeping, they give grace ?
A. No ; the sacrament is bot as the glasse of the
physitian that carieth the oyle, bot the oyle and not
the glasse cureth the wound.
Q. Then God giveth nothing to ws^ hot the oufiuard
scale ?
A. Yea, he both ofFereth and giveth grace, bot
we must by faith receive els wee ar not the better.
Q. How mamj sortis of sacramentis ar ther ?
A. Some before the fall, some after the fall in
the kirk of the Jewes, som in the Christian kirk
after Christ cum in the flesh.
Q. Quhaf ivas the sacrament hefor the fcdl ?
A. The tree of lif in paradyse q^^ was a seale of
the covenant of works that if Adam should obey
God he should live for ever in Christ. — Eev. ii. 7.
Q. Quhat were the sacramentis in the kirk of the
Jewes ?
A. Circumcision, q^^ in substance and natur
answereth to baptisme, and the passover, q^^
answereth to the Lordis Supper.
Q. Quhat was circumcision .?
A. The cutting away of the foreskin of the flesh
of everie manchild the 8 day after they wer borne.
Q. Quhat was the grace seeded in that sacrament ?
A. The cutting away of the uncircumcised and
stony heart, and the bodie of sinne. — Col. ii. 11.
220
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* roasted.
t i.e. livetli.
t herbs.
Q. Quhat was the passover 1
A. The eating of a lamb rosted* with fire, and
the sprinkling of the blood of it upon the postis of
the dooris.
Q. Quliat is the grace sealed in this sacramsnt .?
A. That as the Israelites quhose doores was
sprinkled with the blood of the lamb was delivered
from destruction that cam upon Egypt, so those
quhose soules ar sprinkled with the blood of Christ
ar saved from the eternall wraith of God.
Q. Quhat meanes the rosting in fire and the eating
of the lamb ?
A. That our soullis by faith eateth and leavethf
upon Christ the lamb of God, quho was brunt in the
furnace of his Fatheris wraith for our sinnes.
Q. Quhat sort of a lamb was it ?
A. A male of the flock without any infirmitie, to
be a sacrament of spotles Christ.
Q. Quho eat it ?
A. Only the people of the Jewes and in everie
familie, because onlie Godis people hath pairt in
Christ and applyeth Christ to their soules.
Q. In quhat habit 2
A. With their loynes girded up and staves in
their handis, because those quho commeth worthilie
to the sacrament should mak them for their jorney
to heavin.
Q. With quhat other meat ?
A. With bitter heirbis| and unleavened bread,
because they that lies their pairt in Christ should
prepaire them to bear the crosse and to bee free of
hypocrisie. — 1 Cor. v.
Q. Quhat tym- ?
A. In the evining, because Christ died in the end
of the world.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
221
^ i.e. drunken.
Q. Qiihat ar the sacramentis of the New Testament ?
A. Baptisme and the Lordis Supper.
Q. Quhat seeth your eye in haptisme q^^ is the signe ?
A. Water sprinkled upon ane infant.
Q. Quhat is sealed to us heer ?
A. Our new birth and washing from our sinnes ;
as the infant's face is under the water so ar our
sinnes buried with Christ in baptisme, and we ar
washed from our sinnes and put on Christ. — Gal.
iii. 27.
Q. Quhat is the end of haptisme ?
A. That we may be received as burgesses in
Christ's citie to be holie and without blame before
him.— Tit. ii. 14.
Q. Quhat zvarrand have zee to hajrttise infants that
understands not the sacrament .?
A. God himself warrands it that because they ar
within the covenant they should also receive the
seal of the covenant. — Gen. xvii. 10; Acts iii. 25.
Q. Ar all loashin from their sinnes that ar baptised ?
A. No; baptizme is bot a signe (1 Pet. iii. 21),
it is Christ's blood onlie, laid hold on by faith, that
saveth us from our sinnes (1 Joh. i. 7 ; 1 Pet.
i. 18, 19; Eph. i. 7).
Q. Ar infantis all damned that dieth without the
sacrament of haptisme ?
A. Thair is no warrand in Godis word to bind
Godis hands so as he could not save without out-
ward meanis.
Q. Quhat see yee in the Lordis supper ?
A. Bread takin, brokin, and eatin, and wine
poured out and druken.*
Q. Quhat is meaned and givin thenvith ?
A. Our soul by true faith eateth and drinketh
Christis flesh and blood, and wee ar nourished and
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
until.
Of the masse.
Transubstan-
tiation.
tie. Into.
groweth up in him, and our union among ourselves
is sealed up.
Q. To qiihat end ordaiiiecl the Lord that sacrament ?
A. Quhen Christ left his spouse he gave hir this
sacrament as a love tokin to mak hir in faith
remember that hir husband was crucified for hir,
q^^* the mariage day come that he and shoe meet
againe.
Q. Quhen did Christ first ordain this supper ?
A. The night when he was betrayed, leaving it
as his last command befor his death, that his kirk
should doe this in rememberance of him.
Q. Bot is not Christ offered in ane unbloody sacrifice
in this supper to his Father ?
A. No j as Christ suffered and died bot once, and
cannot die againe, so he is bot once offered upon the
crosse.— Heb. ix. 25, 26, 27.
Q: Is the tread and the wine turned over and changed
mf Christis Iodic and blood ?
A. They ar changed in their use as being, after
they ar consecrat by prayer, no longer common
food, bot in substance and natur they remaine bread
and wine.
Q. Quhy then doth Christ call the bread and the wyne
his bodie and blood ?
A. Because in all sacraments men speaketh so,
and because als truelie as wee eat and drink in
faith, als truelie wee receeve Christ crucified and all
his blissings, and ar spirituallie nourished in him.
Q. Bot quhy may we not say that Christ's body in
substance is tliere ?
A. 1, Because then the cup also in substance should
be. the new testament, q^'^ is a dreame; 2, then
should be two Christs, one that giveth, ane other
givin j he should not be true man, and soe not our
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
223
Saviour if his bodie wer in a thousand sundrie places
,at once.
Q. Quhat is the meaning then of this q^^ Christ said,
This is my bodie ?
A. He meaned this bread q^'^ I have takin,
bhssed, and brokin (1 Cor. x. 16; Acts xx. 7;
1 Cor. xi.), is a sacrament and pledge that I doe
surelie give to zow * beleevers my bodie and blod to
be food to nourish your soulis, as quhen a lord
delivereth to a captain the keyes of his castell, he
sayth, Behold, I give zow my house to keep.
Q. Is Christ then reallie present in this sacrament ?
A. Yea, certainlie the Lord doth reallie and
truelie, not in imaginatione, give us his bodie and
blood, bot after a spirituall maner.
Q, Quhat is further meaned hy the hread ?
A. That as it is one bread maid up of many grains
of quheat ; so we ar one body among ourselves, and
so we ar oblished to love one another.
Q. Quherin standeth the love of the sainctis one to
another 2
A. Praying one for another, mourning with those
that mourneth, and rejoysing with those that
rejoyseth (1 Cor. xii. 26; Eom. xii. 15; Eph. vi.
18, 19; Acts iv. 32 ; 1 Joh. i. 4), helping and re-
leeving the poore, and edifying one another.
Q. Hoiv do ive edifie one another ?
A. Wee should teach one another (Col. iii. 16),
exhort one another (Heb. iii. 13), rebuik and warne
one another (Lev. xix. 17; 1 Thes. v. 14), and meitt
togidder and confer upon Godis Word (Mai. iii. 1 6 ;
Col. iv. 6; Eph.iv.29; Ps. xxxvii. 30; Prov. xxxi. 26).
Q. Then is it lawfull for pivat Christians to expon'\
Godis Word as pastors doe ?
y^. It is not lawfull for them to teach publicklie
as Godis mouth to the kirk, bot it is their duiety
224
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
i.e. discern.
t perhaps for
blood.
upon all occasions in privat to expon and apply
Godis Word both to themselves and to the con-
science of others.
Q. Hoiv must they he jpreijared quho commeth loorthilie
to the Lordis supper ?
A. They must com with faith and love, and
therfor should, under the paine of damnation, try
and examine themselves, and so eat and drink.
Q. HoiD ar wee to try ourselvis ?
A. We ar to tak the candle of Godis Word and
Spirit into the house of our soulis, and to searche
our mynd, will, affectiones, etc., and because Christ
is to com in in the sacrament we must putt all his
enimies, our sinnes, to the doore.
Q. Quhat is the judgement of univorthy receivers ?
A. They eat their owne damnatione because they
decerne* not the Lordis bodie.
Q. Quhat is it to decerne the Lordis bodie ?
A. First, it is with faith to think upon Christ
crucified, and with sorrow upon our sinnes that slew
him ; 2, to remember with thanksgiving the love of
Jesus ; 3, to eat and drink as the Lord hes commandid,
and for this end that Christ and wee should be one.
Q. Quho decerneth not Christ's bodie ?
A. Papists, that sayeth the naturall bodie is in
the bread, and remooveth the cup, saying his bodie f
is in the bread ; such as without faith eat as swine
as if it wer common bread.
Q. Quhat is the sinne of those that refuseth to com
to the Lordis table .?
A. They refuse to marrie Christ, as the woman
that refuseth a ring sent by hir wooer refuseth him-
self, and he that refuseth the king's seale to confirme
ane inheritance refuseth the inheritance also.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
225
Chap. 36.
*i.e. tree.
Aquinas on
par. 2 qu. 14,
art. 3 ; Belar-
min. lib. v.,
De justifica-
tione, cap. vii.
t i.e. in his
debt.
Cap. 32.
-Of ye Second Pairt of True Religion,
QLK IS Obedience to God.
Q. Seeing we ar not justified by any loorks, is tJier
any need luee should doe good worJcs ?
A. Yea, such need that everie trie* that bringeth
not foorth good fruit is hewin downe and cast into
the fire. — Mat. iii. 10; Jam. ii. 20; Heb. xii. 14;
1 Cor. vi. 9, 10; Kev. xxii. 15.
Q. Can ive merit or deserve Godis favour and salva-
tione by our good tvorks ? — Eph. ii. 7, 8 ; 2 Tim. i. 9.
A. Not at all (Luk. xvii. 10), for when we have
done all wee ar unprofitable servantis. — Eom. xi.
5, 6; Rom. vi. 23.
Q. Quhy is the lifeternall called a reward? — Mat. v.
A. Because God hes promised freelie of his grace
to reward our good works, thereby hyring us as a
father doeth his bairne at scoole.
Q. Quhat think zee then of their doctrijie that sayth
not onlie doth God for his promise reioard our good
worksj hot also because the works ar a p-yce of good
value and ivorth to procure eternall glorie ?
A. I think such proud Pharisees hes takin
counters in their hand to reckon with the Almightie
and pay him for fear they die in his common.^
Q. Quhat things ar reqityred to mak our works
truelie good befor God ?
A. They must be commanded of God (Deut. iv. 2;
Mat. XV. 9), done in faith (Acts xv. 9 ; Heb. xi. 6 ;
Rom. xiv. 23), and for ane respect to Godis glorie
(1 Cor. X.31 ; Col. iii. 17 ; Mat. vi. 2, 3, 4).
Q. Ar the good tvorks of the regenerat ])erfite befor
God 2
A. No, they ar lik water mixed with clay, and
wee in them lik unskilfull archers looks away to
ourselvis quhen wee should look to Godis glorie. —
Jam. iii. 2 ; Rom. vii. 1 9 ; Jam. iv. 3 ; Gal. v. 1 7 ;
Rom. vii. 23.
226
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
Chap. 37.
Against the
Papists works
of supereroga-
tion.
otliged.
t i.e. not.
Q. Then ar our good works all sinnis ?
A. They ar not sinnes but polluted with sin
(Jam. iii. 2), and yet our Lord for Christis saik
accepteth of them. — 1 Pet. ii. 5 ; Eph. i. 11 ; Ps.
xxxi. 1 ; 1 Joh. ii. 1 ; Rev. viii. 1, 2, 3.
Cap. 33.— Of the Law.
Q. Ar toe able to keep the law ?
A. No flesh is able, for if we say we have not
sinne we ar lyars. — 1 Joh. i. 8, 9 ; Job ix. 2, 3 ;
Jam. iii. 2 ; Ps. xix. 13 ; cxxx. 3 ; xxxii. 6 ; Pro v.
XX. 9 ; Isa. vi. 5.
Q. Bot doth not some holie men more then the law
requireth quhen they give their hodie to bee brunt for
Christ ?
A. No, they ar oblished* quhen God calleth them
to love God better than their owne life, and so' doth
bot quhat the law requireth.
Q. Quhat is the use of the laiv if ive can no'\ obteane
salvatione by it ?
A. It encloseth us under condemnation as a citie
beseiged with a garrisone of souldiers that we may
seek to Christ for mercie. — Gal. iii. 23 ; iii. 10, 11 ;
Acts ii. 37, 38.
Q. Quhat is the use of the latv after we are com to
Christ ?
A. After Christ lies maid agreement betwixt us
and the law, we delight to walk in it for the love
of Christ.— 2 Cor. v. 14 ; Ps. cxix. 30, 63, 97, 105,
127.
Q. Quhat rules have we to knoiv the peifectione of the
law?
A. Four.
. Q. Quhat is the first ?
A. The law commandeth all good and forbiddeth
all evill.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
227
Q. Qiihat is the second ?
A. It is spirituall, and commandeth the mynd
and judgment to know and discerne good and evill
(Isa. i. 3 ; Jer. iv. 22 ; ix. 3), the memorie to keep
good (Deut. vi. 5 ; Ex. xx. 8), the will and affec-
tions to choose and love good, and to hat* and abhorre
evill (Deut. xxx. 19; Josh. xxiv. 15; 1 Thes. v. 21),
and the quhole memberis of the bodie to be weapons
of righteousnes to serve God (Rom. vi.).
Q. Quhat is the thrid rule ?
A. It chargeth us to obey perfitelie and sinceerlie,
having all the pouers of our soul in the right frame,
with thir faces toward God. — Mat. xxii. 37 ; Jam.
ii. 10; Philip, iv. 8 ; Rom. vii. 7.
Q. Quhat is the fourth rule ?
A. It comandeth the meanes of obedience and
forbiddeth all occasiones of sinn (Mat. v. 27, 28 ;
Job xxxi. 1 ; Deut. vi. 3 ; Ps. xxvi. 4, 5), and that
wee in our place should cause all others to keep the
law of God (Eph. iv. 29 ; 1 Pet. iii. 9 ... 11).
Cap. 34.— Of the Commandementis.
Q. Quhat is the sowme^ of the ten commandementis ?
A. In the first table, conteaning four commandis,
wee ar charged to love God above all thingis; in the
nixt table, conteaning six commandementis, wee ar
charged to love our neighbour as ourself.
Q. Quhat is the soivme of the first command, Thou
shall have no other Godis, etc.
A. Wee ar charged to worship and fear the onlie
one true God, with all the powers of our soul, and
to love and esteeme of him above all thingis evin as
being ever befor Godis eyis.
Q. Quhat ar the sjpeciall vertues commandid in the
first command ?
A. Wee ar chairged first to know; 2, beleeve;
228
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
''I.e. con-
demned.
3, keep God and his word in our memorie and heart ;
4, trusting; 5, hopeing in him; and 6, loving him;
7, to be zealous for his glorie ; 8, rejoycing in him;
and 9, obeying him, we must be, 10, patient, and
11, humble toward him; and 12, fear him in our
heart ; and 1 3, honour him outwardlie.
Q. Quhat vices ar speciallie forbidden ?
A. Wee ar forbiddin to be atheists that wor-
shippeth no God at all, and to worship anything in
the place of God as idolators, or to worship God
superstitiouslie after our fancie, and to have recourse
to Sathan or witches in our trouble, or to trust in
any thing, friendis, riches, pleasure, either besid God
or above God, and all sort of sinning against the
true God is heir damned.*
Q. Quhat further faultis ?
A. Wee ar forbidden to pray to sainctis or
angellis, the ignorance of God, unbeleef, hypocrisie,
dispair, dowbting of Godis pouer for goodnes, all ar
God-condemned.
Q. Quhat ar we commanded in the 2 command .?
A. We ar chairged to worship God in spirit and
in treuth (Joh. iv. 23, 24), after that maner onlie
that he hath commandid in his Word.
Q. Quhat ar we heir forbidden ?
A. We ar forbidden to worshippe ane image as
God or the true God in ane image, because his
infinit majestie is lik nothing maid with handis or
any creatur.
Q. Quhat is the sjpeciall vyce heer forbid in ?
A. All will worshippe, and therfor in the right
maner of Godis worship wee ar to denie our own
witt and give ourselvis over to be ledd with Godis
Spirit speaking in his Word.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
229
Q. Quhat other vices ar forUddm ?
A. Wee ar forbiddin ether to mak or to worship
ane image representing God, or to give ether inward
or outward worship, ether with heart or knee or
bodie to any creature or image.
Q. Bot quhen we boio our knee he/or ane image of
tree or stone or gold our mind tvorshipis God, not the
image ?
A. All the idolators in the world thinketh that
ther is some Godhead in their images, yea, evin in
the sunne or moone.
Q. Bot may not God he represented hy ane image ?
A. He doth forbid it expresslie (in Deut. iv. 12),
and the Godhead is not * lik unto nothing* maid with
handis, nether is it laufull to think so of him. —
Acts xvii. 29; Isai. xl. 18.
Q. Quhat ar the speckdl pairtis of Godis worship ?
A. We ar in faith and obedience to heer his word
and receive the sacramentis, pray to God onlie, and
to worship God in such outward ceremonies as ar
sett down in his Word.
Q. Quhat faultis ar contrair to this ?
A. Heir ar condemned, 1 , hypocrisie ; 2, contempt
and profanation of Godis worship ; 3, ey-worship ]
4, prayer to sainctis or angellis ; 5, all ceremonies that
counterfeittis such as ar not [of] the treuf kirk (Lev.
xviii. 3) ; 6, all changing of Godis ordinances (1 Kings
xii.) ; 7, all meanes and provocations of idolatrie.
Q. Quhat ar the reasons to move us to keep this com-
mand ?
A. Two; a threatning and a promise.
Q. Quhat is the threatning ?
A. Godis wraith burneth against the offenders,
both fathers and sonnes, that hatteth him, as a
husband is inraged against a quhoorishj wif.
230
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
■ obliged.
t teiiipteth.
Q. Quhat is the promise?
A. God wil show mercie to those quho worship
him aright, and to their bairnes to a thousand
generations.
Q. Quhat ar ive commandid in the 3 command?
A. To think, speak, and professe befor the world
of God, his natur, wordis, and workis, with all fear
and reverence,
Q. Then tvee ar oblished * in all thingis to glorifie God ?
A. Yea, certainlie, the end of all we doe should
not be our owne pleasur, profit, or credit, but God's
glorie. — 1 Cor. x. 31.
Q. How glorifie ive God in his natur ?
A. Quhen we beleeve in him and confessis his
goodnes and holines before men (Rom. x. 10; 1 Pet.
iii. 5), and setteth foorth the excellencie of his
glorious natur in our conference with all reverence.
Q. How glorifie we God in his word ?
A. 1, Quhen wee obey it in aholie lif ; 2, quhen it
is sweet to us (Ps. xix.) ; 3, quhen wee teech it to
others and maketh it the mater of our speach at
hame and abroad. — Deut. vi. 6, 7.
Q. Quho faileth heir ?
A. All godles livers, idle and filthie speakers.
Q. How glorifie we God in his worJcis ?
A. Quhen wee think and speak to Godis glorie
(Ps. cxxxix. 14 ; Gen. i. 31), for his works of creation
and ruleing the world, especiallie in rewairding good
men and evill.
Q. Quho faileth heir ?
A. All such as scorne Godis works and abuse
the creatures, to charming and reading of fortunes,
such as play at cardis and dice, and by lots in Godis
worship tempethf his previdence.
1
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
231
■^ t.e. 1
hood.
Q. Quhat ar the speciall vertues of the tongue heir
commcmdid ?
A. To swear by the Lord in a weighted matter
quhen Godis glorie requireth it, and to vow and pay
our vowes to him.
Q. Quhat oathes ar unlawfull ?
A. First, fals oathes ; 2, rash and sudden oathes
upon light and naughtie reasons; 3, idolatrous
oathes for fals godes, by sainctis blood, or our soul.
Q. Qiihy may we not swear e by creatures ?
A. Because swearing is ane incalling upon God
as the all-knowing lord and the judge quho rewardeth
treuth and falsit,* and this glorie may be givin to no
other. — Isa. iii. 7 ; Zeph. i. 5.
Q. Quhat is a laufull voiv ?
A. Quhen the thing we vow is laufull (Ps. cxxxii.
3, 4; 1 Sam. xi. 11; Gen. xxviii. 20, 21), and in
our pouer to doe (Mat. xix. 11), quhen we vow to
God onlie, and not to the creature, and performis our
vowes, and especiallie quhen we vow ourselfis to
Christ in baptisme.
Q. Quhat ar the speciall unlaufull vowes in Poperie ?
A. Quhen men voweth povertie, q^^ is of itself a
judgment of God; 2, quhen they obey men or
prelatis in quhatever they command them (1 Cor.
vii. 23) ; 3, quhen they vow chastitie quho wanteth
the gift of continence.
Q. Quhat is the thretning of this command ?
A. God will summond him before him that
breaketh his command, and condemne him as a
guiltie man.
Q. Quhat is commanded in the 4 command?
A. Magistrates, maisters of families, and all ranks
of men ar ordained to set apairt a portion of everie
day, especiallie the quhole Lordis day from ther
ordinary calling, to worship God in his house
232
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
■ done.
iSic.
t kept.
publicklie, and give thoughts, wordis, deeds, to his
service. — Isa. Ivi.; Iviii.; Neh. xiii. 15; Jer. xvii.
22; Ex. xxii. 12.
Q. Quhaf workis ar Icmfullie don''' this day ?
A. 1, Workis of Godis worship; 2, workis of
charitie, as to helpe the poore, and 3, the workis of
necessitie, as to lead ane oax to the water.
Q. QuJio abuse the rest of Godis day ?
A. Those that ar idle this day, q^^ is horses'
Sabbeth;f 2. those that sportis and playis, q^^ is
the bairnes' Sabbeth ; 3. those quho banquittes and
feastis, q^'^ is the belligodis Sabbath ; 4. those that
sinnes, q^'^ is the devils' Sabbath ; 5. those quho
waitis upon worldlie callings this day, q^^ is the
wretches' Sabbath.
Q. Bat is not the Sahbath a ceremonie that ceased with
Christ ?
A. No ; Christ after his coming willeth it to be
keeped^: (Mat. xxiv. 20), and it was comraandit to
Adam in paradise before any ceremonie was.
Q. How ar we ivarrandid to heepe the first day of tJie
week ?
A. Our Saviour and his apostles keped it, and wee
follow them. — Joh. xx. 19; Acts xx. 7; xxvi. 22;
1 Cor. xvi. 1; Rev. i. 10.
Q. Is it laufull to keep holie any other dayes ?
A. No; for that is a will worship (Col. ii. 16),
and a receiving of Christ in vaine (Gal. iv. 1 0).
Q. Quhat ar the reasones of this command ?
A. Because God hes given us six dayes, and hes
takin bot one to himself, and because he rested upon
this day.
Q. Quhat is it to sandifie the Sabbath ?
A. It is to sett all apairt from the dawning of
the day untill midnight (Joh. xx. 1 ; Acts xx. 7) for
Godis service.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
233
than.
t carry.
Q. Quhy is the second fable lik unto the first ?
A. Because quhair men hes true love to God they
cannot bot doe a duetie to their neighbour, and the
one cannot be without the other.
Q. Quhat order must he keeped here ?
A. We must love and obey God before men, and
among men I am mor oblished to the kirk then * to
one man, or to the faithfull then * to the unfaithfull.
Q. Quho is our neighbour ?
A. All men, evin strangeris and enimies.
Q. Quhat is commandid in the 5 command ?
A. That we carief ourselves justlie to our equalls,
and that we love, reverence, and obey our masteris
in the lord, and that they doe a duetie unto us.
Q. Quhat is the duetie of the king and magistraf ?
A. They must maintaine religione (Deut. xvii. 1 9 ;
Ex. xviii. 21; Isa. xlix. 23; Ezech. vii. 27), peace
(1 Tim. ii. 2), and justice (Num. xxxv. 31, 33;
1 King. XX. 42; Job xxix. 12, 13).
Q. Quhat is the duetie of the subjectis ?
A. To pray for them (1 Tim. ii. 1), love and obey
them in the Lord both by doing and patient suffering
of punishment (Eph. vi. 5, 6, 7 ; 1 Pet. ii. 13, 14),
and pay them their due (Mat. xv. 4, 5 ; Rom. xiii.),
and not to be seditious (Prov. xxiv. 21) and proud.
Q. Quhat is the ministeris duetie ?
A. To feed the flock of God (1 Pet. v. 2), and
give attendance unto reading (1 Tim. iv. 13), being
apt to teach (Tit. i. 9), and godlie (1 Tim. iv. 7).
Q. Quhat is the duetie of the flock ?
A. To obey, love, and reverence the pastor (Heb.
xiii. 17; 1 Thes. v. 13), pray for him (Eph. vi. 19),
and mak him partaker of all their goods (Gal.
vi. 6).
234
THE SOUME OF CHllISTIAN RELIGION.
See p. 185.
t i.e. hire.
I.e. young.
Q. Quliat is the hushandis cleutie ?
A. To love his wifF as Christ doeth his kirk. —
Eph. V. 28.
Q. Quhat is the iviffis duetie 2
A. To be subject to him as to the Lord. — Eph.
V. 22.
Q. Quhat is the fatheris duetie ?
A. To nurture and bring up the childrene in
Godis fear (Job i. 5), to be ane example of pietie to
them (Josh. xxiv. 15 ; Heb. iii. 9), and leive them a
just conquesse'^ (Jer. xvii. 11).
Q. Quhat is the duetie of children and young ones 1
A. To obey auKi follow good parents, to help
them in distresse, and to be humbled and repent,
seeing the evill lif of their evill parentis. — [Ezech.]
xviii. 14, 15.
Q. Quhat is the duetie of the masteris ?
A. To esteeme the servantis brethren (Eph. vi. 9),
to teach them Godis way (Gen. xviii.), and pay them
their hyrf (Jam. v. 2 ; Col. iv. 1).
Q. Quhat is the servandis duetie ?
A. To doe service in singlenes of heart as unto
God.— Col. iii. 22; Tit. ii. 4; Gen. xxxi. 4.
Q. Quhat is the duetie of the learned and the scoole-
master 2
A. Not to be proud of his learning, and to teach
his scoUers Godis feare, airtis, and good maners.
Q. Quhat is the duetie of the zongX ones 2
A. To remember the creator in their zouth (Ecc.
xii. 1), flee the lusts of zouth (Tit. ii. 6 ; 2 Tim.
ii. -22), and honour the aged (Lev. xix. 32; Job
xxxii. 6, 7; Mark x. 17 ; Gen. xxviii. 8; 1 Kings
ii. 19; 1 Pet. V. 5).
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
235
Q. Quhaf is the dufie of the aged ?
A. To walk in the way of righteousnes (Prov.
xvi. 31), being sound in faith, love, and patience
(Tit. ii. 2).
Q. Quhat is the oich man's diietie ?
A. To be rich in amous* deedis, and all good
workis ( 1 Tim. vi. 1 8), not to be high minded, nor
trust in uncertaine riches (1 Tim. vi. 17), and if he
be maid low to rejoyce that God hes maid him see
the vanitie of his riches (Jam. i. 10).
Q. Quhat is the poor mans duetie ?
A. To learne to want (Philip, iv. 12), and seek
the kingdome of God cheeflie (Mat. vi. 33).
Q. Quhat is the duetie of equallis ?
A. To provoke one another to love (Heb. x. 24 ;
Gen. xlv. 24), and esteeme other better than them-
selves (Philip, ii. 3).
Q. Quhat promise is maid to those that keeps the
5 command ?
A. God promiseth to them a long and a peaceable
lif
Q. Bot the wicked live long and become old (Job
xxi. 7), the godlie die young ?
A. As a, great house full of copper or yron is not
so much worth as a litle portione of gold, soe the
few dayes of the godlie is better then the manie
yearis of the wicked.
Q. Quhat ar wee chairged to in the 6 command ?
A. Wee ar chairged to be mercifull to the lif of
all, both ourselvis and otheris, evin our enimies
and beastis (Prov. xii. 10; Deut. xxii. 6), and all
inward hatred and outward violence to our neigh-
bour's lif forbidden.
Q. Quhat inward murther is forbidden ?
A. 1. Eash anger (Mat. v. 22) ; 2. hatred (1 Joh.
iii. 15); 3. want of compassion (Jam. iii. 14; Amos
236
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
^Year, per-
haps a slip for
day. — Eph.
iv. 26.
+ soldiers.
I i.e. those who
shed innocent
blood.
vi. 5, 6), frowardnes (Rom. i. 29), desire of revenge
and envie (Pro v. xiv. 30), rankor or wraith of a
zeir* old.
Q. Quhat oidivard murther is forbiden ?
A. Wounding, killing, oppressing the poor widow
and the fatherles. — Mic. iii. 1; Lev. xxiv. 19, 20;
Ex. xxii. 22 ; Gen. ix. 6.
Q. Is all taking away of the lif murther ?
A. No ; for magistratis and men in the lawfull
defence of their bodie, without desire of revenge
(Gen. ix. 6; Lev. xxiv. 14; Deut. xiii. 5), and
sohldiersf in laufull warres (1 Sam. xxv. 28; Heb.
xi. 33, 34 ; Deut. xx. 13), for the defence of religion
and their countrie, may kill, and yet ar not mur-
therers.
Q. Quhat other evills ar forbidden ?
A. All occasion of murther, all quarrelling, mock-
ing, breaking, and cursed speaking (Judg. viii. 1 ;
Acts xxii. 22; Eph. iv. 31; Pro v. xii. 18; Lev.
xix. 14 ; 2 Sam. vi. 20; Job xxix. 15), frowning,
and lowring (Gen. iv. 5 ; 1 Sam. xviii. 9), snuffing,
all surfitting to hurt our health, and when publick
streets, bridges, and staires ar not repaired, etc.
Q. HoiD ar piiblick 7nen guiltie of 7)iurther ? — Deut.
xxii.; Numb. xxxv. 31, 32.
A. Quhen they draw not Godis sword against
inocent blood,J quhen they exceed the line of mercie
in punishing, or punisheth out of revenge.
Q. Quhat vertues ar especiallie heir commandid 1
A. To have ane cair of our owne and our neigh-
bouris life, and to seek peace.
Q. Quhat inward vertues furthereth to this duetie ?
A. 1. Meekness and slownes to anger; 2. courtesie
and humanitie (1 Pet. iii. 8 ; Gen. xxiii. 4, 6) ;
3. rx3adines to forgive, evin our enimies (Prov. xix. 11;
1 Pet. iv. 5 ; James v. 1 0), and to suffer wrongis.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
237
*i.e. dealing.
Q. Quhat things doth outwardly procure yeace ?
A. Friendlie deilling,* myld and soft answers
(Prov. XXV. 1), a passing from our right to seek
peace (Gen. xiii. 8, 9 ; Matt. xvii. 26), and fleeing
of the beginning of wraith (Prov. xvii. [14] ; Eccl.
vii. 8; X. 11).
Q. Is it not laufull to go to laio ?
A. Yea, it is laufull to seek peace and hold off
wrongis, provyding it be done without revenge or
break of charitie.
Q. Reacheth this command onlie to our neighbour's
hodie ?
A. Wee also ar chairged to tenderf his soul by
teaching, counsall, rebuik, and exemple of holie lif
Q. Quho faileth hearl?
A. All idle and ignorant ministeris, quho ar soul
murthereris, and privat men, quho faileth in gaining
soulis to God. — Matth. v. 1 6 ; 1 Pet. ii. 12; Matth.
xviii. 17; 1 Cor. x. 32.
Q. Quho other faileth heir ?
A. Kingis and magistratis that ether maintaineth
false religion or suffereth the true religion to die
among their handis.
Q. Quhat commandeth the seventh command ?
A. That wee be temperat in the use of all bodilie
pleasures, and keep the bodie chast from fornication,
incest, adultery, buggerie, Sodomie, and the heart
from inward boylling lusts.
Q. Doth the command forbid no more ?
A. It forbiddeth gluttonie and drunkennes, filthie
talk, vaine apparell, lustfuU eyis and eares, uncleane
twiching and kissing, and quhoorish dauncing, and
the companie of stewis and harlotis, and all occa-
sion of filthiness.
238
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* For right
or aright.
Q. Quhat is the remidie of lust ?
A. Mariage, q"^ is the laufull knitting togidder
of one man and one womane, according as God hath
commandid in his law.
Q. Quliat ar wee com7nandid in the 8 command ?
A. That we give to everie man his owne, be con-
tent with that God hes given us, and labour for our
living in a laufall calling.
Q. How manie wayis ar goodis gottin laufullie .?
A. By birth and laufull purchase in our calling. —
Lev. XXV. 45 ; Num. xxvii. 8; Gen. xxiii. 14, 15.
Q. Quhat ar the sjpeciall faultis in unjust conquesse ?
A. Thift (Eph. iv. 28), robborie and oppression
(Isai. iii. 14, 15); 3, extorsion (Luk. iii. 14 ; 1 Sam.
ii. 12), usurie (Ps. xv. 5 ; Exod. xxii. 25; Ezech.
xviii.), and deceit in buying and selling with fals
weightis, beguiling wares, and all unjust withdraw-
ing of quhat is not ours (Hab. ii. 9 ; Isai. v. 8).
Q. Quhat ar the sjpeciall virtues quherin we use our
goodis Wright .? *
A. In frugalitie or thriftines and liberalitie.
Q. Quherin standeth thriftines ?
A. In keeping carefullie quhat God hes given us,
not wasting it ether in gluttony, drunkennes, feed-
ing the idle ; or unneedfull cautionarie, or idleness,
or negligence, or playing, or quhooring. — 2 Cor.
viii. 14 ; Joh. vi. 12 ; Prov. xxi. 17; Prov. xi. 15.
Q. Quherin standeth liberalitie ?
A. In ane honest feeding and cloathing of our
selvis, and helping the necessities of the poore
(Eom. xii. 13 ; Lev. xxv. 35 ; Psal. xxxvii. 19), and
lodgeing the stranger (1 Pet. iv. 9 ; Prov. xi. 24 ;
Rom. xii. 13).
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
239
Q, Quliat is the s])eciaU vyce that this vertue fightis
against ?
A. Against that monster of manie headis, cove-
tousnes and avarice, the root of all evill.
Q. Quhat is the purpose of the 9 command ?
A. To bridle and rull* the tongue in speaking the
trueth for the maintenance of the dignitie, lif,
chastitie, goudes,f but especiallie the good name of
our neighbour and our owne.
Q. Quherfor hath God set doivne often commande-
ments two, to wit the 3 and ye 9, onlie for the tongue ?
A. Because the tongue is a world of evill, and
setteth the world on fire, and is set on fire be hell,
worse to be guided then ane wild horse and great
shippes (Jam. iii. 3, 4), and the devillis sword, q''with
he striketh Godis glorie in all the ten commande-
mentis.
Q. Hoiv is Godis glorie woundid in all the commande-
mentis by the tongue ?
A. Because with the tongue men blisseth idols
and blasphemeth God, and speaketh vaine wordis on
the Sabbath. It curses our superiores, bringeth o^
blood and lust, it uttereth our covetousnes, falsit,|
and lies of our neighbour, and is the messenger of a
lustfull and unclean heart. — Matt. xv. 19.
Q. Quhat speciall vertue is heir commended ?
A. Ane love of the trueth and ane uttering of the
trueth freelie (Dan. iii. 1 6 ; Acts iv. 8 ; Acts x. 1 3),
and with wisdome (Matth. x. 1 6), and simplie, with-
out double speaking and lying (Zach. viii. 16), and
bepng] careful! of our neighbour's name.
Q. How doe wee § erre in speaking the trueth ?
A. Quhen they§ ar silent quhen Godis glorie re-
quireth that they speak, and the trueth is spoken to
hurt men (Psal. Hi. 3), in proud boasting, flatterie
(Job xvii. 5).
240
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
* i.e. tales.
t lawyers,
t market.
Equivocation.
Q. Quhat is the true ground of mainteanmg our
neighhouris name ?
A. To putt on love that is not suspitious of ill
(1 Cor. xiii. 5), but exponeth all things to a good
meaning (Gen. xxxvii. 31, 32; Jer. xl. 14, 15, 16),
and commendeth our neighhouris vertues (2 Cor.
ix. 2).
Q. Is if not laufull to suspect evill of our neighbour
and condemne him ?
A. Yea, it is; providing we have good grounds to
doe so and break not charitie.
Q. How is both the treuth and our neighbouris name
hurt in wordis ?
A. 1. By sclandering and forging taillis* (Lev. xix.
16; Prov. xxvi. 20; Rom. i. 29, 30; 1 Kings xxi. 12;
Mat. xxvi. 60, 61); 2. by willing heiring of evill
reportis (Ex. xxiii. 1; 1 Sam. xxiv. 10; Prov. xxv. 23),
by lying, by bullying talk (1 Tim. v. 13), flatterie
(Prov. xxvii. 14 ; Eom. xvi. 18), boasting (Prov.
xxvii. 12), dissembling (Ps. Ixii. 3, 4) discovering
secrets, and vaine talking.
Q. How manie sortis of lies ar their ?
A. Some public in fals judgis, fals witnessis, and
lying ministers and lawers,f and all oppin beguiling
in court and mercatt,J and privat lies ether in sport
or earnest.
Q. Is it laufull to sjpeah and letter treuth in wordis
of twoe meanings .?
A. Sathan ever from the beginning, and the
Jesuits, his scollers, in doeing, in speaking soe ar
lyars, for ther purpose is to beguile and to hide the
necessarie treuth.
Q. Quhat is forbidden in the 10 command?
A. All inclinatione of our heart to hurt our
neighbour in bodie, goods, or name, ether arising
from our heart naturallie, or then accompanying
with the consent of our will.
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
241
* Perhaps xlv
or Iv. 9
■\i.e. material.
+ i.e. akin to.
Q. In quhat command then is the inclination of our
heart to sinne against the first table of the km forbidden?
A. In everie command of the first table, but
especiallie in the first command.
Q. How manie sortis of lusts ar heir condemned ?
A. The lust of natur to hurt our neighbour, and
all lustis follow[ing] thereupon.
Q. Quhat sinnes tulthin us ar heir condemned ?
A. 1. The Avant of ane holie inclinatione in our
natur to doe good to our neighbour ; 2. wandering
and evill thoughts tempting to evill (Prov. xx. 9 ;
Zech. viii. 17; Isai. xv.* 9; Iv. 7; Acts viii. 22; Prov!
XV. 26 ; Gen. vi. 5); 3. wandering and evill thoughts
welcomed and received by our delighting in them
as sudden wishes and evill dreames, and a fighting
against. the Spirit, teaching us to doe good to our
neighbours.
Q. Bot hoiv can dreames be sinnfull, since in sleep,
reason and icill ar bound up that ice ccmnot command
them ?
A. Sinnfull dreames ar counted our sinnes, because
our vaine mynds in the day tyme runnes upon evill
thoughts, and wee ar not carfull by prayer and
heavenlie meditating to season our heartis with
gearef q^^ will bring holie dreames in their place.
Q. Bot when Sathan castis in evill thoughtis in our
hearts, ar they our sinnes ?
A. Noe, except we welcome them with delight
and consent, for it is not a sinne to be tempted of
Sathan, because Christ was tempted.
Q. Hoiv shall we knoiv Sathan' s temptations from the
temptations of our oivne heart ?
A. Such temptations as nature at the first abhorrs,
as to kill ourselvis or the lik, ar from Sathan; tempta-
tions from ourselvis ar sibb to J nature, and almost
never wanteth delight.
242
THE SOUME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
pride.
Q. Quhat is the highest and ripest degree of lust?
A, Quhen it bursts out in envie, evill desires, and
bringeth foorth evill workis.
Q. Quhat ar the sjjeciall sinnes that ariseth from
those lusts ?
A. Lust, covetousnes, and prid,* or ambition,
because men's heartis worshippes those three godis
of the world, pleasure, profite, and honour.
Q. Quhat is the siieciall remedie against the lust of
nature ?
A. Daylie sorrow and slaying of the bodie of
sinne and denying ourselvis.
Q. Quhat is the speciall remedie against all desires
coming from the lust of nature ?
A. We must both crucifie our lusts by repentance,
and fill our heartis with Godis love, in quhom we
may find q*ever we seek in pleasure, profite, and
honour.
ANOTHER, BY Mr. THOMAS WYLLIE.
FIRST LORD'S DAY.
Concerning God.
Q. QuJiat 2viU become of them that
hioio not God ?
A. The Lord Jesus will come in
flameing fire to take vengeance on
them qo kuowes not God.
Q. Quhat sort of knowledge is re-
quired of us ?
A. A saveing knowledge, backed
with obedience.
Q. Quher is that savinrj knoidedge
to he had ?
A. In the holie Scriptures : the
holie Scriptures ar able to mak us
wise to salvation.
Q. Quhat doeth the holie Scriptures
teach us concerning God ?
A. That he is and quhat he is in
himself, and quhat he is in respect
of us.
Q. Hoio does the Scriptures teach
us that there is a God ?
A. By divyne testimonies out of
his owne mouth.
Q. Give me some of those testi-
monies ?
A. See now that I, even I, ame
he, and that ther is no other God
beside me. — Isa.
Q. Quhat is God in himself?
A. Ane uncreated Spirit, haveing
life and being in himself, infinite in
all his properties, and one in nature.
Q. How many j^ersones ar ther in
that one Godhead ?
A. Three, the Father, the Sonne,
and the Spirit.
Q. How differis these three persones
amongst themselvis ?
A. The Father begettis, the Sonne
is begotten, and the Spirit flowes
from the Father and the Sonne.
Q. From quhat Scripture prove ye
that these three distinct persones are
one in essence ?
A. From 1 Joh. v. 6, 7. Ther ar
three that bears record in heavin,
the Father, the Word, and the Spirit,
and these three are one.
SECOND LORD'S DAY.
Concerning God's Decrees.
Q. Quhat is God toward his crea-
tures ?
A. He is King and Soveraigne
Lord over all these creatures.
Q. Quherin does his Tcinglie powr
stand ?
A. In his decree.
Q. Quhat hes he done in his decree ?
A. He ordained all things before
tyme that he brings to passe in
tyme.
Q. Quhat ar the properties of his
decrees ?
A. They are eternall, unchange-
able, certaine, and righteous.
244
wyllie's catechism.
Q. Qiihat he.-> God decreed concern-
ing man ?
A. He lies decreed to mak his
glorie knowne in man's eternal estate
and being.
Q. How manic jmrts lies this de-
cree ?
A. Two parts, election and repro-
bation.
Q. Quhat is election '
A. It is God's ordaining of some
men through grace to glorie, and
that to the praise of the glorie of his
grace.
Q. Quhat is reprobation ?
A. It is God's passing by the
most part of men, leaving them in
their sinnes to damnation.
Q. Quhat moved the Lord to mah
this difference among men ?
A. Nether good nor evill in man,
bot his owne good will and pleasure.
Q. May not a reprohat man object
against the equitle of such a decree ?
A. Nay, bot quho art thou,
man, that rei)liest against thy
maker ?
THRID LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 3.— Of the Creation.
Q. How bringeth God his decrees to
passe ?
A. By the works of creation, pro-
vidence, and redemption.
Q. Is God, then, the Creator of all
things ?
A. God by his Sonne and the
Holie Spirit.
Q. Quhat is creation ?
A. It is God's making all things
of nothing with his word, to his
glorie.
Q. How know ye that God made
all tilings of nothing ?
A. I know it nether by sense nor
reason, bot by faith, because the
Scripture saith it.
Q. How many dayes was the Lord
in the work of creation ?
A. Though all might have been
ended at one instant, yet it cost the
Lord six dayes for our capacitie.
Q. Quhat wer the excellentest crea-
tures that God made ?
A. Angells and men.
Q. Quhat ar angells ?
A. Understanding spirits created
of God, holie and happie.
Q. How many sorts ar ther of
them ?
A. Two, good and elect that
stood ; evill and reprobat that fell.
Q. Quhen was man made ?
A. In the last of the six dayes.
Q. Quherof was man made ?
A. His bodie was made of the
dust, and his soull was inspired, ane
heavenlie substance.
Q. To quhose image teas man
made ?
A . To God's image.
Q, Quherin did God's image shine?
A. In two things.
Q. Quhat be those two things ?
A. First, the rrghteousnes and
holines both of his bodie and soull ;
ondiie^ the government that God
gave him over all the creatures.
Q. How call ye that state that man
was in then ?
A. The state of innocencie.
WYLLIE S CATECHLSIM.
245
FFOURTH LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 4. — Of Providence,
Q. Quhat is the second work q''hy
he puts his decrees to execution ?
A. The work of providence.
Q. Quhat is providence ?
A. It is God's wise, preserving,
governing, and directing of all things
created to their owne endis for his
glorie.
Q. How many j^^i^'^'i^ «?* ^^^6?' in
providence ?
A. Two, preservation and govern-
ment.
Q. Quhat is preservation ?
A. It is God's bearing up of all
things created in his armes, least
they should turne to nothing.
Q. Quhat is government 1
A. It is God's moveing of all
things to work, and directing of
their work to his owne glorie.
Q. Towards quhat creatures is
God's j^rovldence most to he seen ?
A. Towards angells and men.
Q. Quhat see yee of God's provi-
dence towards the angells ?
A. I see him strenthening some
to stand, and suflfering other some of
them to fall.
Q. In quhat things do we see God's
providence most especiallie towards
man ?
A. In his falling and raising of
him up again e.
Q. Quhat differences ar ther betivixt
the fall of the angells and the fall of
man ?
A. Two.
Q. Quhat is the first difference?
A. Quhen the evill angells [fell]
the elect angells fell not with them,
hot all mankind fell in Adam.
Q. Quhat is the second difference ?
A. The fallin angells ar not raised
againe, bot some of fallin mankind
ar raised againe in Christ.
FFYFT LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 5.— Of Adam's Fall and
SiNNE IN GENERALL.
Q. Quhat is it ye call the fall of
Adam ?
A. It is Adam's willing breaking
of the command God gave him.
Q. Quhat toas the command he
hrak ?
A. Thou shalt not eat of the tree
of the knowledge of good and evill.
Q. Bot hoio coidd Adam break,
seeing he ivas made able to keep the
command ?
A. Although the Lord gave him
abilitie of keeping, yet he gave him
not an impossibilitie of breaking.
Q. It seemes then that God hes some
ivyte'^ of Adam's fall because he gave
him not that imjJOSsibiUtie ?
A. It follows not, for he could
not give him ane inward impossibilitie
flowing from the unchangeablenesof
nature, for that had beene to make
him a God and not a creature ; 2^^^,
for an externall impossibilitie of fall-
ing flowing from the underpropeing
of confirming grace he was not bound
to give him that.
Q. Quho temjJted Adam to sinne ?
A. Sathan tempted Evah,and shoe
tempted him.
1 Blame.
246
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
Q. Can Sathan force us to slnne ?
A. He temptes, he forces not, he
knocks at the doore, and we oppin
and lett him in.
Q. Quhat have ice to do with
Adam^s slnne?
A. We entered airs^ to him, and
sinne is all the legacie and bairnes'
part of gear 2 we gote.
Q. Quhat are the fruits of Adam's
sinne ?
A. All following sinnes, and all
punishments.
Q. Quhat is sinne ?
A. A transgressing of God's law.
Q. How many evills ar titer in
everie sinne ?
A. Four ; first, the oflFence done
to God ; 2iie, the filth and blott of
sinne that lyes on the soull ; S^i®,
the guilt of sinne that lyes on the
conscience ; 4'*% the punishment of
sinne that cometh both on soull and
bodie.
SIXT LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 6.— Of the several Divisions
OF Sinne.
Q. How divide ye sinne following
Adam' s fall ?
A. In[to] originall and actual!
sinnes.
Q. Quhat is originall sinne ?
A. It is the through-corruption
of nature that we draw from the
womb, called the bodie of death.
Q. How many parts ar ther in
originall sinne?
A. Two; first the want of originall
righteousnes ; 2^^*^, evill concupis-
cence.
Q. Quhat floives from the want of
originall righteousnes ?
A. A waywardnes or aversenes
from God.
Q. Quhat floives from evill concu-
X>iscence ?
A. A browden-nesseS upon sinne.
Q. Quhat is actuall sinne ?
A. It is the breach of God's law,
ether in thought, word, or deed.
Q. Give me a division of actuall
sinne ?
A. Some ar sinnes of omission,
and some of commission.
Q. Quhat is a, sinne of omission?
A. It is the not doeing of that
cf^ should be done.
Q. Quhat is a sinne of commission?
^. It is a doeing of that qcii
should not be done.
Q. Give me ane other division ?
A. Some sinnes are pardonable,
some are not pardonable.
Q. Quhat sinnes are pardonable ?
A . The sinnes of the elect that ar
ba[c]ked through the spirit of contri-
tion w* repentance.
Q. Quhat sinnes are unpardonable?
A. The sinnes of the wicked that
are alwayes ba[c]ked with finall im-
j)enitencie,
Q. Quhat is the most remarkable of
these ?
A. The sinne against the Holie
Ghost.
Q. Quhat is the sinne against the
Holie Ghost ?
^. It is a malicious and wilfull
fighting against the knowne treuth
revealed by God's Spirit, and in de-
spite of the Spirit of grace.
1 Heirs.
^ Goods.
Eager desire.
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
247
Q. Qiihat is the ^:)«/w*sAme?«^ of
sinne ?
A. The first and second death,
and all the tastings of death's cup.
Q. Give a j)lcice of Scripture quher
all the forsaids ar sett doivne in few
words ?
A. Quhen lust is conceived it
bringeth foorth sinne, and quhen
sinne is finished it bringeth foorth
death. — James i. 15.
SEVINTH LORD'S DAY.
Chapt. 7.— Of the Knowledge of
Sinne by the Law.
Q. How come we to the knowledge
of our miserable condition through
sinne and punishment ?
A. By hearing of the law preached.
Q. Quhat think ye of them that
never hear the law p)reached ?
A. They are not sensible of sinne,
and they will die without the law.
Q. Are all sensible of sinne that
hear the laiv preached ?
A. No, bot onlie those quhose
conscience the Lord wakins, ether
in justice to damnation, or in mercie
to salvation.
Q. How does the laio loahin the
conscience ?
A. By revealling sinne to it, and
convinceing it of sinne.
Q. Quhen is the conscience wakened
in justice to damnation ?
A. Quhen the sight of sinne drives
away from God, as it did Judas,
Q. Quhen is the conscience toakened
in mercie to salvation ?
A. Quhen the sight of sinne
makes way for a Saviour, and drives
us out of ourselves into Christ, as it
did Peter.
Q. Can the law doe this of itself ?
A. No, bot the Lord soe disposes
upon the working of the law, that
in it, by contraries as it were, he
drawes lif out of death.
Q. Quher is the doctrine of the law
to be had ?
A. In the ten commandements.
Q. How divide ye them ?
A. Into two tables ; in the first
ther ar foure commandements, and
in the second six.
Q. Quhat is the summe of the first
table ?
A. Thow shalt love the Lord thy
God with all thyne heart, and with
all thy soule, and with thy quholl
strenth.
EIGHT LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 8.— Of the Ten Commande-
ments.
Q. Say the first command?
A. Thou shalt have none other gods
before my face.
Q. Quhat are ive charged to doe in
this command ?
A. We ar charged to tak the onlie
true God to be our God, and to
worship that true God.
Q. Quhat is forbidden in that com-
mand ?
A. Atheisme and not worshipping
of God.
Q. Say the 2'"^ command ?
A. Thow shalt not mak to thyself,
etc.
Q. Quhat are loe charged to doe in
this command ?
A. We are charged to worship
God in spirit and treuth according to
the rule of his owne Word.
248
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
Q. How many partis ar fher in
God^s worsJiip ?
A. 1, The faith full and reverent
hearing of the word and receiving
of the sacraments ; 2^''^, fervent
prayer.
Q. Qiihat is forhidden in this com-
mand ?
A. All will- worship, and in par-
ticular the worshipping of ane idoll
as God, or the worshipping of God
in or by ane idoll.
Q. Quhat is the danger of hreahinr)
this command ?
A. God's wraith burneth against
the breaker unto the thrid and fourth
generation.
Q. Quhat is the gaine of keejying
this command ?
A. The mercie and love of God
followeth the keeper unto the thou-
sand generation.
NYNTH LORD'S DAY. '
Chap. 9. — Of the 3 and 4 Com-
mandements.
Q. Say the thrid command ?
A. Thow shalt not tak the name
of, etc.
Q. Quhat are we charged to doe in
this command ?
A. We are charged to think and
speak of God, his names, his word,
and his works in- all reverence and
fear, to swear by himself quhen his
honour requires, arid to mak all our
vowes to him.
Q. Quhat are we forhidden in this
command ?
A. We are forbidden to think or
speak irreverentlie and inconsider-
atlie of God, his names, his word, or
his works, to swear falslie or mak
unlawfull vowes.
Q. Quhat is the danger of breaking
this command ?
A. The Lord will summond the
breaker[s] before the tribunal of
justice, and find them guiltie.
Q. Say the fourth command?
A. Kemember the Sabbath day
to keep it, etc.
Q. Quhat are ice charged to do
here ?
A. We ar charged everie man for
himself and everie master for him-
self, and all that are under him, to
sett this day apairt and sanctifie it
to the Lord.
Q. In how many things does the
sanctijieing of this day stand ?
A. In two ; V^, in resting from
all worldlie busines ; 2*^^, in spend-
ing the day quhoUie in religious
exercises.
Q. May not little businesses be done
on the Lord^s day ?
A. The man that gathered the
handfull of sticks to warm himself
with on the Sabbath day was stoned
to death.
Q. May not some great ivorhs of a,
noble nature he done ?
A. The holie women, quhen they
have prepared the spices and oynt-
ment, may not embaulm the bodie
of the Lord on the Sabbath day.
Q. Quhat religious exercises shoidd
be -performed ?
A. Hearing of the Word, praying
privatelie and publiclie, private
meditation and Christian conference.
Q. Quhat is forhidden ?
A. Spiritual idlenes, sporting,
drinking, waiting on worldlie call-
ings, and all manner of sinnyng.
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
249
Q. Quhat are the reasons to move
obedience to this command ?
A. 1, Our Lord's liberalnes in give-
ing us six clayes and taking bot one
to himself; 2ii®, his example, quho
wrought six dayes and rested the
sevinth.
TENTH LORD'S DAY.
Chapt. io. — Of the First Three
Commands in the 2nd Table.
Q. Quhat is the summe of the 2«'^
table ?
A. Thow shalt love thy neighbour
as thyself.
Q. Say theft/ft command?
A. Honour thy father and thy
mother, etc.
Q. Quhat are we charged to do in
this command ?
A. Inferiours are charged to doe
a duetie to superiors, as parents,
masters, ministers, and magistrates,
to love, obey, and reverence them,
and to be subject to them in the
Lord ; on the other hand, superiors
are bound to due [sic] a duetie to
inferiors, as children, servants, people,
subjects to nurture them, pay their
hyre, feed and govern them ; likwise
equalls are bound to doe a duetie
one to another, as to love and help
one another home to heavin.
Q. Quhat is here forbidden ?
A. The contrarie of all these.
Q. Quhat is the promise to move
obedience to this command ?
A. God promises to them a long
and happie life.
Q. Quhat is the sixt command ?
A. Thow shalt not kill.
Q. Quhat are ive charged to do
here ?
A. To preserve our neighbour's
life, and to do everie thing that
may i^reserve peace.
Q. Quhat are ive forbidden ?
A. To doe any outward violence,
to entertaine any inward hatred, or
to do anything that may break the
bond of peace.
Q. Say the sevinth command?
A. Thow shalt not commit adul-
terie,
Q. Quhat are ive charged to doe
heer ?
A. To be sober in the use of all
bodilie necessities, to be chaste from
all fornication and all inward boyl-
liug lusts.
Q. Quhat is forbidden heer ?
A. All filthiness in thought, word,
or deed, and all occasion of filthines.
ELEVINTH LORD'S DAY.
Chap. ii. — Of the Three Last
Commands of the 2ND Table.
Q. Say the eight command ?
A. Thow shalt not steall.
Q. Quhat are ive charged to doe in
it?
A. First, to winne our liveing
honestlie in a lawfull calling ; 2^%
to be content with quhat portion
the Lord bestowes upon us ; 3^^% to
doe to everie man as we wold have
done to us.
Q. Quhat is forbidden heer ?
A. All wrongeous purchase by
steall[ing], deceiving, oppressing,
and extorting, all prodigaU wasting
of that quhich we have.
250
wyllie's catechism.
Q. Say the nynth command 'i
A. Thow shalt not bear false wit-
nes against thy neighbour.
Q,. Quhat are we charged to do
heer ?
A. To maintein our neighbour's
honest name by speaking the treuth
without dissimulation.
Q. Quhat is forbidden ?
A. The wronging of our neigh-
bour's name by bearing false witnes
against him, ether for feod i or favour.
Q. Say the tenth command ?
A. Thow shalt not covet, etc.
Q. Qiihat is commanded heer ?
A. Holy intentions, thoughts, and
motions of heart.
Q. Quhat is forbidden ?
A. Sinfull intentions, thoughts,
and motions of heart.
12 LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 12.— Of the Difference
BETWIXT THE OlD AND NeW
Covenant.
Q. Are we able tofidfill the law?
A. No ; for the law is spirituall,
and we are carnall, sold under sinne.
Q. Quhat is the ])iinishment of the
breach of the law ?
A. God's curse, Cursed is everie
man that continiieth not in everie
thing that is written in the law to
do the same.
Q. Quhy commands the Lord a law
that we are not able to keep, and
punishes so severlie the breach of it ?
A. Because He made us able to
keep it, and our inabilitie is of our
selvis.
Q, How calls Paull this shine-
discovering and curse-threatening law
of God?
A. The law of works.
Q. Quhy is it called soe ?
A. Because it conteans the coven-
ant of works.
Q. How many covenants hes God
made ivith man ?
A. The covenant of works, or the
old covenant, that caries a curse in
the bosom of it to the breakers, and
the covenant of grace or the new
covenant, that caries redemption in
the bosome of it to beleevers [as] a
cure for the curse.
Q. Quhat is the first difference
betwixt the old and the neio testament
or covenant ?
A. The condition of the old is
works, the condition of the new is
faith.
Q. Quhat is the second dfference ?
A. The old promises onlie eternall
life, the new promises both remis-
sion of sinnes, sanctification, and
eternall life.
Q. Quhat is the thrid difference ?
A. The old covenant was made
with all mankind, the new with
God's elect people onlie.
Q. Quhat is the last difference ?
A. The new covenant is better
nor the old, for it hes a mediator,
the old hes none ; it is everlasting,
and cannot be broken, the old was
broken.
13 LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 13.— Concerning the Per-
sone of the Mediator of the
New Covenant.
Q, How many wayes is the covenant
of grace manifested ?
A. Two wayes : obscurelie in the
Old Testament, under shaddowes ;
bot clearlie in tlie New in Christ.
1 Feud or enmity.
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
251
Q. Quherfor is the covenant called
o. testament?
A. Because it was sealled with
the blood of Christ, and dieing, Jesus
left us in legacie all the blissings of
tlie covenant.
Q. Qiihat have we to consider of
Christ the Mediator of the covenant?
A. Something concerning his per-
sone, and something concerning his
office.
Q, Qiihai persone is he ?
A. The second persone of the
Trinitie, the Sonne of God, that by
him we might receive the adoption
of sonnes.
Q. Quhat things have ive to con-
sider of his j^ersotie ?
A. Two ; first, the two distinct
naturis ; 2^^% the union of them in
one Christ.
Q. Quhat are the tivo distinct
natures ?
A. The Godhead and the man-
heid ; he is true God equall with the
Father, and true man lik unto us in
all things except sinne.
Q. Quhy was he God ?
A. That he might bear in his
persone the wrath of God, that no
creature could doe.
Q. Quhy was he man ?
A. That he might die for man.
Q. How are these distinct natures
built togidder in one Christ?
A. In the first moment of our
Lord's conception these two by-
divine wisdome in ane unspeakable
manner wer built togidder, so that
both of them hes ther seats in one
persone without confusion or divi-
sion.
Q. How teas our Lord conceived ?
A. By the Holie Ghost over-
shadowing the virgine.
Q. Off quhom icas he borne ?
A. Off the virgine, without the
knowledge of man.
14 LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 14.— Concerning the Offices
OF Christ.
Q. Quhat is the Lord's office ?
A. To be a mediator betwixt God
and man to make up the agreement
againe.
Q. Quhither is he mediator as God
or as man ?
A. He is mediator both as God
and man, everie one of the natures
doeing that q"^^ is proper to itself.
Q. How differs Christ from other
mediators ?
A. Although he gott the ridder's^
stroak, yet he fled not away till the
agreement was made.
Q. Quhat is our mediator's name?
A. Jesus Christ.
Q. Quhy is he called Jesus ?
A. Because he saves his people
from their sinnes.
Q. Quhy is he called Christ ?
A. Because he was anointed to be
king, preist, and prophet of the kirk.
Q. Quherin stands his 2^ro2yhetical
office ?
A. In that he teaches us the
quholl will of God concerning our
salvation.
Q. QiJierin stands his hinglie office?
A. In delivering us from the
tyrannic of Sathan, sinne, and the
world, and in mainteaning and rule-
ing us as his subjects.
1 One who parts combatants.
252
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
Q. Quhat are the ijroperties of the
h'mq ? ,
A. He is most pourfuU, most wise,
most just, most glorious.
15 LORD'S DAY.
Chap. 15.— Concerning X's Preist-
HOOD.
Q. Quherin stands Ckrlst^s -preistlie
office ?
A. In offering himself for us, and
interceeding with the Father for us.
Q. Quhat difference is ther hetwixt
Christ's 2^^'eisthood and the j^reisthood
of A ar 071 ?
A. First, Aaron's preisthood [or
preists] offered for themselves and
then for the people, Christ offered
onlie for his people, not for himself ;
2ii®, Aaron's preists offered many-
sorts of sacrifices, Christ offered but
one, the lamb of God ; S^^e, Aaron's
preists repeated their sacrifices oftin,
Christ's sacrifice was bot once offered ;
4^i% Aaron's oftin repeated sacrifices
could not tak away sinne, bot
Christ's once offered taks it away.
Q. Quherin agrees Christ's preist-
hood with Aaron's preisthood ?
A. As in Aaron's preisthood the
sacrifices wer prepared, so Christ
prepared himself.
Q. How did Christ prepare him-
self?
A. By sanctifieing himself for us
and obeying the law.
Q. Qiihen began his obedience to
the laio ?
A. In the eight day of his age,
quhen he was circumcised.
Q. Quhy was he circuwcised ?
A. Because he' was a debtor to
the law for us, and a Saviour to the
Jewes.
Q. Quhy was he baptized ?
A. That the Gentiles might have
als much comfort from his baptism
as the Jewes from his circumcision,
being stamped with one stamp with
him.
Q. How long continued Christ's
suffering ?
A. From his cradle to his rising
out of the grave.
Q. Quhat did he suffer all this
tyme ?
A. He suffered something in his
estate, something in his name, some-
thing in his bodie, and something in
his soull.
Q. Quhat suffered he in his estate ?
A. Povertie.
Q. Quhat suffered he in his name ?
A. Eeproaches.
Q. Quhat suffered he in his bodie ?
A. Hunger, thirst, wearisomnes,
sweating of blood, death itself.
i6 LORD'S DAY.
[Ch. 16.]— Of Christ's Sufferings.
Q. Quhat death stffered oiir Lord?
A. The shamefull death of the
crosse.
Q. Quhy suffei'ed he such a shame-
fidl death ?
A. Because that shamefull death
was a cursed death, and blissed
Jesus became a curse for cursed
sinners.
Q. Bot seeing Christ suffered death,
how could he be ane offerer of himself
for our sinnes?
A. Weel eneugh, for Christ was
not a naked sufferer, bot likwise a
doer, and although the human nature
J
wyllie's catechism.
253
did suffer, yet the divyne nature,
as it wer in its hands, offered the
human nature a sacrifice for sinne.
Q. Quho was preist, quhat the
sacrifice, quhat the altar in this
offering ?
A . Christ was preist, sacrifice, and
altar.
Q. How hioio ye that ChrUt offered
himself for us and died for us?
A. The Scripture sayes it that he
Mas our cautioner, and that he dyed
and was bruised for our sinnes.
Q. But we gave Christ no commis-
sion to stand in our rowme ?
A. Qiihen we beleeve in Christ
we allow and sayes Amen to the
commission that his Father gave
him, q° gave him a ransome for
many.
Q. Quhat was done loith our Lord's
body after he was crucified ?
A. He was layd in the grave to
let us see that he was in death's
hands, and yet wan free.
Q. Was there no sign of ChrisVs
deitie in his lying in the grave ?
A. Yes, the wormes durst not lay
their teeth on the holie bodie of
Jesus.
Q. What suffered Christ upon his
soull ?
A. God's wraith, that was a fierie
hell to him.
Q. Quhat tells us that Christ hare
the Father's lorath uiDon him ?
A. The bloodie sweat, and the
prayer for removing of the cup, and
his crying out, My God, my God,
quhy hast thow forsaken me ?
Q. Hoio could he pray for remove-
ing of the cuppe that his Father had
appoynted for him ?
A. It was a sinless fitt of the
humane nature that submissively
spak a word for itself.
Q. Quhy cryed he out that his
Father had forsakin him?
A. Because his Father's bright
countenance did not shine upon him
so fullie as before, but, as it wer, hid
itself.
17 LORD'S DAY.
Ch. 17.— Of the Resurrection and
Ascension of Christ.
Q. Quhen Christ was layd in the
grave, did he ly still ther ?
A. Not, he rose at the thrid day.
Q. Quhy did Christ ryse againe ?
A. First, that he might be de-
clared to be the Sonne of God ; 2^'^,
that he might be declared to be a
perfite Saviour for us, quhom corrup-
tion and death could not bind ; 3''®,
that we through him might gett the
victorie over death ; 4''^, that we
may be raised from the grave of
sinne, and be made new creaturis ;
lastlie, that by him we may be raised
againe to glorie.
Q. How long remained Christ upon
the earth after his resurrection ?
A. Fourtie dayes, and then he
ascended up into heavin.
Q. Quherto did he ascend ?
A. First, to sett the alreadie
glorified humane nature in the chair
of glorie ; 2''®, to prepare a place
for his brid[e], and to tak state and
seasine of the purchased inheritance
in her name ; 3''®, to send the Com-
forter to her.
254
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
Q. Quhat Is the place he hes in
heavin ?
A. He sitts at the right hand of
God the Father.
Q. Quherfore sifts he ther ?
A. To tak our bills off our hands,
and to make intercession for us.
Q. Bot Stephane sayes he saw him
standing at the right hand of God the
Father ?
A. Sitting and standing are but
borrowed speeches for our cai)acitie,
for his sitting signifies his equalitie
with the Father, his standing signi-
fies his readines to give his enemies
a blow.
1 8 LORD'S DAY.
Ch. i8.
Q. To quhom belongeth the bought
redemjition ?
A. To none bot to Christ's sheep,
his brethren and kirk,
Q. How divide yow Christ^s kirk
in respect of her externall condition ?
A. In the kirk triumphing in
heavin and the kirk militant on
earth.
Q. Quliat is the kirk militant?
A . A number of chosen men and
women called of God by his Word
and Spirit from sinne to grace, from
basenes to glorie.
Q. Quhy is Christ^s kirk called
Catholick ?
A. Because in all places, and
amongst all persones, Christ hes
some that belonges to himself.
Q. Quhy is she called holie ?
A. Because she bears the stamj)
of Christ Jesus, who is holie.
Q. How divide ye ChrisVs kirk upon
earth ?
A. In the invisible and visible
kirk.
Q. Quhat is the invisible kirk?
A. The kirk of beleevers, that>
can no more be scene than faith can
be seene.
Q. Quhat is the visible kii'k ?
A. The kirk of i)rofessers, that
quhilles lurks lik the moone that
lours under the cloiids, and quhilles
is more conspicuous.
Q. Quhat is the mark of the true
visible kirk ?
A. The Word purelie preached,
and the sacraments purelie admini-
strat.
Q. How is Chrisfs kirk ruled at
this tyme under the gospell ?
A. By his officebearers, doctors
that opins up the Word, pastors
that presses it upon the hearers,
elders that rules in discipline, and
deacons that cares for the poor.
Q. Quhat pour hes the kirk ?
A. To bind and shut by the
threaten ings, to loose and oppin by
the promise.
Q. May shoe not mak lawes ?
A. Not, bot expone the law
alreadie made.
19 LORD'S DAY.
Q. How is purchased redempfio7i
made the beleever''s owne ?
A. By the act of justifieing faith
after their calling.
Q. How many sorts of calUng are
there ?
A. Two, one outwardlie by the
Word, ane other inwardlie by the
Spirit,
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
255
Q. Quhat is imvard effectuall call-
ing ?
A. It is the pull of the Spirit in
the Word, q^'by soulls ar driven to
Christ, that they may be made one
with him.
Q. Quhy may toe not resist the
Spirit'' s working ?
A. "We ar naturallie inclined soe
to doe, hot the Lord, by his omni-
potent pouer, does soe graciouslie
draw us that we cannot bot follow.
Q. Is there nothing in us to move
the Lord to work, nor yet to help him
in loorking ?
A. Not soe, we ar called of grace
and not of works, and in the first
moment of our conversion we ar als
dead as Ezekiell's dry bones.
Q. How may a man know that he
is effectuallie called ?
^. If he be a willing eyer and
server of God ; 2''®, if he renounce
all sinne ; 3''®, if he be a lover of
God's Word ; 4''^, if he be a lover of
the brethren ; 5''°, if he have a con-
tinual combat betwixt the flesh and
the Spirit.
Q. Quhat are the signes of true
repentance ?
A. First, a carefulnes to rouze
from securitie ; 2'''^, a cleansing of
the conscience by confessing the
guilt of the porsone ; 3''°, holie in-
dignation against sinne and ourselvis
for sinnes sak ; 4"®, fear to fall in it
againe ; 5"°, vehement desire to be
freed of sinne ; 6''°, zeal to God's
glorie ; 7''°, revenge by tameing of
our flesh and all the lusts therof. —
2 Cor. vii. 11.
Q. Quhat ar the fruits of repent-
ance ?
A. Peace of conscience, and joy
in the Holie Ghost.
Q. Quhat ar the fruits or rather
consequences of renewed repentance ?
A. The restoreing of us to our
former comfort, — Psa. li. 1, 2.
Q. Is it requisite for everie
renewed sinne that ther shoidd he re-
newed repentance ?
A. Yea, because new guiltines is
removed by new repentance, though
repentance be one as faith is one.
2o LORD'S DAY.
Q. Quhat in us does first answer
effectuall calling ?
A. Repentance.
Q. Quhat is repentance ?
A. It is a godlie sorrow for sinne,
with a change of all the soull's
operations from evill to good.
Q. Quito works repentance ?
A. It is not in our pour, but the
Lord works it by his Holie Spirit. —
Zech. xii. 10.
21 LORD'S DAY.
Concerning Faith.
Q. Quhat is the second thing that
ans^* effectuall calling ?
A. Faith.
Q. Quhat is faith ?
A. It is an assured knowledge
that Christ came into the world to
save sinners, and a leaning on him
for salvation to me a sinner.
Q. Quhat is the object of faith ?
A. Christ crucified. — Isa, xlv. 22.
256
wyllie's catechism.
Q. Qiihat are the acts of faith ?
A. To know Christ (John ix. 36) ;
2''% to apprehend him (Phil. iii. 12);
3''% to api)ly Christ crueitied. — Gal.
ii. 20.
Q. Must I believe that Christ died
for me in particular ?
A. Yea, because the just man
liveth by his own faith.
Q. Does faith grow in our garden?
A. No, it is planted, bot it grows
not.
Q. Quho jjlanted it in the heart ?
A. The Holie Ghost by ane inward
working.
Q. Quhat is the mean cfby it is
planted ?
A. The hearing of the Word
preached is the ordinarie mean. —
Rom. X. 14 and 17.
Q. Qnhy call ye it the ordinarie
mean ?
A. Because the Lord is not tyed
to it, bot can work faith many other
waj^es as he in the deepth of his
wisdome thinks fitt.
Q. Quhat are the properties of
faith ?
A. Three ; first, it grips Christ
absent as if he wer present ; 2''®, it
holds the grip it getts ; 3''®, it is aye
upon the growing hand.
22 LORD'S DAY.
Concerning [Faith],
Q. Are all the acts of a beleever^s
faith in his severcdl cases acts of jus-
tifying faith ?
A. Not, bot they flow from justi-
fieing faith.
(J. Mak that more plalne ?
A. A Christian assaulted with
temptations beleeves a victorie, like-
wise in the tyme of strait beleeves a
deliverie : heer are two acts of faith
in two particular cases, bot nether
of them are acts of justifieing faith;
not the first, because in it faith
doeth not i)roperlie [go] out upon
Christ a justifier, bot upon Christ a
succourer of those that ar tempted ;
not the second, because in it faith
goes out iipon Christ, a commander
of deliverances for Jakob ; and yet
though nether of them be properlie
acts of justifieing faith, notwith-
standing they flow both from it,
because faith does not goe out upon
Christ, a succourer of the tempted,
for victorie, nor upon Christ, a com-
mander of deliverances, for deliverie,
bot by vertue of the claim and
interest that it lies to Christ a jus-
tifier, or apprehended and made the
beleever's own by the act of justifie-
ing faith.
Q. How many so7-ts of faith ar
ther .?
A. Four, a miraculous [faith], a
historicall faith, a temporarie faith,
and a justifieing faith.
Q. Quhat is a miraculous faith ?
A. A beleeving the pour of God
for working of miracles.
Q. Quhat is historicall faith ?
A. A bare beleeving that God's
Word is true.
Q. Quhat is tempo7'arie faith ?
A. A beleeving with joy for a
tyme.
Q. Quhat is justifieing faith ?
A. A looking upon Christ for
justification.
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
257
Q. Ar all those sortes sound and
saving ?
A. Not, bot onlie the last.
Q. How 2^rove ye that miraculous
faith is not saving ?
A. Because damned Judas had it.
Q. Hoio jprove ye that historicall
faith is not saveing ?
A. Because the tormented devills
hes it.
Q. How 2^rove ye that temj)orarie
faith is not sound nor saveing ?
A. Because Simon Magus and
Herod that beheaded Johne had it.
Q. Rehearse the summe of your
faith ?
A. I beleeve in God, etc.
Q. Hoiu divide yow that summe ?
A. In four pairts — one concern-
ing the Father, the second concern-
ing the Sonne, the thrid concerning
the Holie Ghost, and the last is
concerning Christ's kirk,
Q. Quhat beleeve ye concerning the
Father ?
A. That he is the creator of all
things.
Q. Quhat beleeve ye concerning the
Sonne ?
A. Three things — first, something
concerning his deitie and authoritie ;
2^'^, something concerning his humi-
liation ; 3^'% something concerning
his exaltation.
Q. Quhat beleeve ye concerning his
deitie ?
A. That he is the Sonne of God,
equall with the Father.
Q. Quhat concerning his autho-
ritie ?
A. That he
Lord.
IS our soveraigne
Q. Quhat concerning his humilia-
tion ?
A. First — that he was made flesh,
being conceived of the Holie Ghost,
borne of the virgine Marie, without
the knowledge of man ; 2''% that he
suffered under Pontius Pilate, that
his bodie was crucified, that he died
and was buried ; 3"% that he suffered
in his soull the paines of hell.
Q. Quhat beleeve ye concerning his
exaltation ?
A. First — that he rose againe ;
2^'% that he ascended ; 3^'^ that he
is in glorie at the right hand of the
Father ; and 4'^% that he will be
manifested in glorie to judge the
quick and the dead.
Q. Quhat beleeve ye concerning the
Holie Ghost ?
A. That he is God, equall with
the Father and the Sonne, and the
Sanctifier of the kirk.
Q. Quhat beleeve ye concerning the
kirk?
A. That ther is a kirk through
all the neuks"^ of the world ; 2'^%
that that kirk hes ane communion
togidder in Christ ; 3''", that that
kirk hes forgiveness of sinne through
Christ ; and 4^'°, that shoe will put
off her coate of dust, and put on a
coat of immortalitie ; and lastlie,
that shoe will follow the Lamb in
glorie for evermore. [* corners.
23 LORD'S DAY.
Of Justification.
Q. Quhat is justification q^^ ye say
faith looks ^ipon Christ for?
A. It is the gracious sentence of
the judge loosing mourning and be-
leeving sinners from sinne and death
R
258
WYLLIES CATECHISM.
and esteeming tliem righteous in
Jesus, and worthie of life.
Q. How can I he made righteous
tlirough ane other man's righteovsnes,
and loosed by the means of ane other 1
A. Weel eneugh, for Christ is not
ane other heer, bot the cautioner in
our stead, and we are the dyvers,
and quhat debts the cautioner payes
the dyver is not craved for them,
Q. Quhat are the parts of our jus-
tlfcation ?
A. Two — not imputing of our
sinnes to us, and the imputing of
Christ's righteousnes to us.
Q. May not the jmtt'mg away of
our sinnes suffice for the work ?
A. Not, because for the making
of a beggar a king, both his old
ragges must be cast off and likewise
a royall robe putt on.
Q. Have we no hand in the work
of justification ourselvis ?
A. We are justified for Jesus sak.
24 LORD'S DAY.
Of Adoption.
Q. Quhat are the fruits of justifi-
cation ?
A. Adoption, sanctification, Chris-
tian libertie, and glorification.
Q. Quhat is adoption ?
A. It is God's gracious receiving
of beleevers to the dignitie of sonnes
for Christ's sake. — John i. 12 and
iii. 1.
Q. How shall one knoio that he is
adopted ?
A. 1. By the testimonie of the
Spirit (Rom, viii. 16) ; 2''% if he be
conforme to his Father, and follow
the footsteps of his elder brother
Christ ; 3''% if he can goe to his
Father like a liveing child, and crave
pardone for all faults, and begg the
supplie of all necessities.
Off Prayer.
Q. Quhat shotdd he the rule of our
prayer ?
A. The prayers that we find in
the Scriptures, and particularlie that
q*='' our Lord hes taught us, saying,
Our Father qch is in heavin, etc.
Q. How divide yow this prayer ?
A. Into two parts, the first con-
teaning six petitions, the nixt con-
teaning a thanksgiving,
Q. How divide yow the petitions ?
A. Into two sets, the first three
are for things concerning God's
glorie, and the last three for things
concerning our owne salvation.
Q. Quhat have ye in the first pyeti-
tion ?
A. A preface, Our Father q°^ art
in heavin, and the petition itself,
Hallowed be thy name.
Q. Quhat teaches the preface yow ?
A. To quhom I should direct my
prayer, evin to my Father quhich is
in heavin.
Q. Quhy call ye him Father ?
A. Because we should come to
him with reverence and love, and
speak to him, though in our lisping
and bairnlie language, as to a
father.
Q. Quhy call ye him our Father ?
A. Because everie barne of the
house should have mynd of all the
rest als weel as of themselves, and
pray for them to the Father.
Q. Quhy say ye Who art in heavin ?
A. First — because we earth-
wormes should come with heavinlie
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
259
myndednes to him; 2'^®, to strenthen
our faith, he is not onlie our Father
willing, bot likewise our Father in
heavin, able to do us good, and
grant us all our lawfull desires.
25 LORD'S DAY.
Q. Quhat is the meaning of the first
petition, Halloived he thy name ?
A. Mak all men know and glorifie
thee in thy nature, persones, and at-
tributes.
Q. Quhat meanes the second. Thy
klngdome come ?
A. Lord gather a kirk to thyself
by thy Spirit, working pourfullie in
the ministrie of the gospell, con-
trarie all oppositions, and tak her,
maried to thyself, up to glorie.
Q. Quhat means the thrid petition,
Thy loill he done on earth as it is in
heavin?
A. Make thy kirk heer upon
earth with a free and readie heart
to yeeld all cheerfull obedience to
thy revealled will, their will sub-
missivelie running in the channell
of thy will.
Q. Quhat seeh ye in the fourth peti-
tion, Give lis this day our daylie
bread ?
A. Food and rayment, with all
things needfull, that may sett us
upon our jorney to heavin.
Q. Quhat seek ye in the fyft 2)eti-
tion. Forgive us {our'\ sinnes as we
forgive them that sinne against us ?
A. The pardons and washing
away of our sinnes in the blood of
Christ.
Q. Quhat seek ye in the last peti-
tion, And lead us not into temptation,
hot deliver us from evill?
A. A deliverie from temptation
and from the punishment of sinne.
Q. Quhat meane ye hy the conclu-
sion. For thyne is the kingdome, etc.?
A. We praise him as our king
quho is pourefull and willing to
save, and to quhom the glorie of our
salvation doeth belong.
26 LORD'S DAY.
Concerning Sanctification.
Q. Quhat is sanctification ?
A. It is a purging of the quholl
man from the filth of sinne to the
puritie of God's image (Eph. iv. 22,
23, 24), and a holie walking in the
creature according to the law flow-
ing from that inward principle of
puritie stirred up and blowne upon
by the Spirit of God.
Q. How many parts are ther in
sanctification ?
A. Two, mortification and vivifi-
cation.
Q. Quhat is mortfication ?
A. It is a killing of sinne, or a
dicing to sinne. — Col. iii. 15.
Q. Quhat is vivlfication ?
A. It is a living unto God and to
newnes of lyffe.
27 LORD'S DAY.
Anent Christian Libertie.
Q. Quhat is the thrid fruit of
justification ?
A. Our Christian libertie.
260
WYLLIE S CATECHISM.
Q. Quherin stands our Christian
lihertie ?
A. In our freedome from the
heavie curse of the law, the tyrannie
of sinne, from the commandements
of men, and from all ceremonies and
will-worship.
Q, Quhat is our lihertie in things
indifferent ?
A. We are to use them, or not to
use them, with a respect to the
gaining of our weak brother, quhose
conscience we should not hurt. —
Rom xiv. : 1 Cor. viii.
28 LORD'S DAY.
Anent the Sacraments.
Q. Hoio is our faith strenthened
and confirmed anent the doctrine of
the gospel ?
A, By the sacraments, which are
the sealls of the doctrine of faith.
Q. Quhat is a sacrament ?
^. It is an externall pledge of
God's invisible grace sealling up our
fellowship with Christ.
Q. How mamj sacraments wer ther
under the law ?
A. Two, circumcision, q°^ ans^^
baptisme, and the passeover, qc^i ans^s
tbe Lord's Supper.
Q. Quhat is circumcision 1
A. It is the cutting away of the
foreskinne of the flesh in everie man
child, Q^^ signifies the cutting away
of the stonnie heart and bodie of
sinne.
Q. Quhat is the passover ?
A. The eatting of a lamb rested
with fire, the door-posts being
sprinkled with the blood of the
same.
Q. Quhat was signified by that ?
A. First, the appre[he]nding of
Christ by faith, quho was rested in
the oven of God's displeasure ; 2''%
as those quhose doores posts wer
sprinkled with the blood of a lamb
wer delivered from the destruction
that came upon Egypt, soe those
hearts that ar sprinkled with the
blood of Christ are saved from God's
wrath that comes on the lost world.
Q. Quhat are the sacraments in the
Neio Testament ?
A. Baptisme and the Lord's Sup-
per.
Q. Quhat is baptisme ?
A. It is a sacrament of our entring
into the kirk, quherin by the exter- !
nail signe of water sprinkled is
sealled up to us our new birth, and
the washing away of our sinnes in
the blood of Christ.
Q. Quhat is the Lord^s Supper ?
A. The sacrament of our confir-
mation, quher[in] by the externall
signes of bread brokin, takin, eattin,
and wine poured out and drunken,
is signified the eatting of his brokin
bodie, the drinking of his poured
out blood, though not bodilie, yet
spirituallie and reallie by faith, soe
that our soulls therby ar nourished
and groweth up in him.
Q. Quhat signifies the distributing
of the elements ?
A. Our lovelie union and kindlie
spirituall communion togidder in
him.
Q. Quhen did Christ institute and
ordaine this sacrament ?
A. That same night he was be-
trayed ; being to leave his bryd, he'
left her a love-tokin to be used by
her in remembrance of his crucified
wyllie's catechisim.
261
self till the mariage day, the glorious
day of their meeting againe.
Q. Quhat is required of wortliie
communicants ?
A. A narrow search and exami-
nation of their way, past and pre-
sent, and the sinceritie of their
purposes quhat they intend to be,
with a tryall of their faith, and love,
and the growth of grace in them.
Q. Quhat is the hazard ofuntvorthie
communicants ?
A. Damnation in not discerning
the Lord's bodie.
Q. Quhat is it to discenie the Lord's
hodie ?
A. It is with mourning to look
upon crucified Jesus, sorrowing for
sinne that hes slaine him
ith
thankfulnes to look upon self-killing
love, rejoyseing in God that hes given
him ; 3''°, with stupeing to admire
the deepth of God's wisdome, quho
by such a way hes reconciled us to
himself in him.
30 LORD'S DAY.
Anent our Resurrection and
Glorification.
Q. Quhat is the last fruit of justifi-
cation ?
A. Our glorification.
Q. Quhat are the degrees of glorifi-
cation ?
A. Two, the first of it is to the
soull onlie after its departing out of
the bodie untill the latter day ; the
second degree is more excellent ther-
after both to the soull and bodie,
UDited in one persone againe.
Q. Quhat intervenes hetivixt the one
and the other ?
A. Two most renouned works, a
generall resurrection and the last
judgment, performed by our Lord
Jesus at the latter day.
Q. Quho shall answer ?
A. All the dead, without excep-
tion, by the powerfull voyce of Jesus,
using the ministerie of the arch-
angell,
Q. In quhat bodies loill those he
raised up againe ?
A. In the same bodies they caried
about with them among the living
and was laid in the dust.
Q. Quhat difference will there he
betwixt the resurrection of the elect
and the resurrection of the reprobate ?
A. Two, first the elect will be
raised by the speciall [virtue] of the
resurrection of Jesus, in quhom, and
togidder with quhom, all the elect
did rise (Eph. ii. 6 ; 1 Thess. iv. 14;
1 Cor. XV. 20, 21, 22). The repro-
bate will be raised by the furie of
the curse. — Gen. ii. 1 7.
Q. Quhat is the second difference ?
A. The elect will be raised with a
coat of glorie and immortalitie, the
wicked with a coat of endless base-
ness and ignominie.
Q. Quhat ivill become of them that
will be living that day ?
A. They will not die, but they
will be changed, q"' change will be
to them instead of death.
Q. Quhat loill become of the heavins
and the earth in that day ?
A. They will be brunt with fire,
and the old worne heavins will flee
away lik a scroll at the presence of
the judge.
262
wyllie's catechism.
Q. Qvho icill be judge ?
A. The man Christ.
Q. Quhat comfort have we of
thai?
A. A great comfort that our cau-
tioner will sitt as judge upon the
debts he payed himself.
Q. Quhen will he judge ?
A. He hes the knowledge of that
keeped to himself, that we may-
watch and pray, looking for his un-
known coming. — Matt, xxiv, 22, 23,
24.
Q. Quhat are the foretokins of that
day?
A. Many shall fall from Christ,
false prophets shall arise, the love
of many will grow cold, and ther
will be warres and rumours of
Q. Quher will the judge sitt ?
A. A great quhit throne will be
sett to him in the aire, and he will
come breaking through the clouds,
accompanied with ten thousand
tymes ten thousand of angells, and
sitt upon the throne. — 1 Thess. iv.
17.
Q. Quhat will he do first being sett
upon the throne ?
A. Having summoned all nations
before him, he will draw them up in
two ranks, and sett the wicked on
his left hand, and the righteous on
his right hand, and that is the order-
ing of the house. — Matt. xxv. 31, 32,
33, 34.
Q. After quhat maner shall he pro-
ceed ?
A. The book of the decrees, the
book of rememberance, the books of
everie man's conscience will be opened
(Rev. XX. 12, 15 ; Mai. iii. 16), and
then the sentence will be pro-
nounced.
Q. In quhat order will the sentence
be pronounced ?
A. First upon the elect, Come ye
blissed of my Father (Matt. xxv. 34),
and then upon the reprobate, Depart
from me ye cursed into everlasting
fire. — Verse 41.
Q. In quhat order will the sentence
be executed ?
A . First upon the reprobate. These
shall goe into everlasting punish-
ment ; and then upon the elect, Bot
the righteous into life eternall.
Q. Quhat is the reason of that
difference betwixt the pronouncing and
executing of the sentence ?
A. The righteous getts the sen-
tence first, because they are to judge
the wicked, in approving by voyce
and assent the righteous judgment
of the judge, q*^^ they cannot doe
quhill they be first justified them-
selvis, the wicked gettis the execu-
tion first that the joy of the elect
may be full, seeing first in oppin
veiw they see the miserie of the
wicked, and after it themselvis are
takin up to glorie.
Q. Quherin stands the highest de-
gree of glorie that the elect are par-
takers of after all this work is
ended ?
A. It stands in this, that being
advanced to the highest and fullest
top of all perfection, they may enjoy
the presence of God and of the Lamb
that sitteth upon the throne, harping
with ther harpes in ther hands, and
singing with melodious and harmo-
nious hallelujahs in ther mouths for
evermore.
wyllie's catechism. 263
Q. Quhat should we doe quhen we for his coming, and answer his pro-
are looking by faith to that neiv Jeru- miseing voyce, Surelie I come quick-
salem? lie, with our desireing voyce, Evin
A. We should weane our hearts soe. Come Lord Jesus, Come quick-
from the world, studie holines, long lie- Amen.
FINIS.
FRAGMENT APPARENTLY BY MR. ROBERT BLAIR.
Of Man s Deliverie.
Q. How is man delivered from that miserie wlierin he fell through
the sinne of Adam ?
A. By the free mercy of God in Christ Jesus, without his
owen deserving.
Q. How doth Christ deliver man ?
A. By the merit of his righteousnesse freelie imputed of God,
and apprehended on our part by faith.
Q. Wliat is that righteousnesse of Christ imputed of God ?
A. It is partlie originall or habituall, partly actuall and
acquired.
Q. The originall righteousnesse of Christ, luhat is it ?
A. It is the holinesse and sinnelesnesse of his nature as man ;
for, being conceived of the Holy Ghost, his manhood from the
first instant of conception was preserved from all contagion of
originall sinne, for he was made man like us in all things, sinne
only excepted. — Heb. iv. 15.
Q. What doeth this habituall or miginall righteousnesse being
imjmted and ajpplyed unto us ?
A. It covereth our originall sinfulness wherein we were con-
ceived and born.
264
Q. The aduall righteousnesse of Christ, what is it .? •
A. It is the acquired righteousness of his active and passive
obedience.
Q. JVherin standeth Chris fs active obedience ?
A. In a perfect and exact fulfilling of all the precepts of the
moral law, and that both in thought, word, and deed. — Mat. v.
17 ; John iii. 17 ; Rom. x. 4.
Q. What doeth the^ imjnUation of this righteousness of his active
ohedience to us .?
A. It covereth and taketh away the guilt of all our actuall
sinnes and transgressions of the law of God, whether they have
been in thoght, word, or deed.
Q. JVherin standeth the passive ohedience of Christ Jesus ?
A. In suffering all that the justice of God could require of
man for the transgression, and that both in his soull and body.
Q. JVhat suffered Christ- in his soidl ?
A, He drank the cupe of the Father's wrath which was due
to us to have endlessly drunken of, both in the garden of
Gethsemane and upon the crosse.
Q. JFhat siffered he in his body ?
A. All the miseries, shame, and contempt which man could
put on him, and in end the cursed, cruell, and shamefull death
of the crosse.
Q. What doeth the imputation of the righteousness of his passive
obedience to us ?
A. It, P^, satisfieth the justice of God fuUie for our sins, so
that God can crave no farther satisfaction at the hands of be-
lievers (Heb. X. 7, 14) ; 2^^, it merited unto us eternal redemp-
tion from sinne, death, hell, and eternall damnation (Heb. ix.
12).
Q. But the Scripture often doth loholly ascribe our justification
and redemption to the blood of Christ, and to the merit of his death
and passion ?
A. Thes speatches ar figurative, the cheafe part of his obedi-
ence, w^^ was passive, taken for the whol obedience of Christ,
BY MR. KOBERT BLAIR. 265
both active and ^^assive, and these speatches do not exclud but
inckid his active obedience, for what he did in obedience to the
law he did it for us, and what he suffered for satisfieing of
God's justice he also suffered soe, and so he that believeth in
Christ hath the perfection of the law. — Eom. x. 4.
Q. How are ive said to be justified and saved freelie, seeing Christ
hath ijayed so dearlie for our deliverance ?
A. Because we pay nothing, but Christ, according to that
eternall transaction w^^ passed between his Father and him,
hath payed all for us, he being the suretie of the new and better
covenant, the article freelie excluding our merits, not Christ's
satisfaction. — Kom. iii. 24 ; Heb. vii. 22.
Q. How Cometh it to ^xisse that the merits of the righteousnesse of
Christ is able to deliver us from the miserie loherin ive fell by means
of sinn ?
A. It is from the dignitie and excellency of his persone who
was both God and man, man without sinne ; for had he been born
a sinner, he could not have satisfied for himself, and if he had
not been God his temporarie suffering could not have obtained
eternall redemption ; but the temporarie suffering of an eternall
person was more satisfactorie than if all we had endlessly
suffered for sinnes.
Of the Birth of Regeneration,
Q. Man delivered by Christ, into ivhat condition cometh he ?
A. Into the blessed estate and condition of regeneration.
Q. Wliat is regeneration ?
A. It is the new birth of the water and the Spirit, wherby
he is made a new creature in Christ, and so the image of God
which he lost in Adam is repaired in him again.
Q. Which be the partes of the neiv birth of regeneration ?
A. Two, justification and sanctification.
266 A FRAGMENT.
Q. What is justification ?
A. An act of God, not imputing sinne, but imputing the
righteousnesse of Christ to salvation.
Q. Wliich he the partes of sandification ?
A. Two, the mortification of the old man and vivification of
the new man.
Q. What is the mortification of the old man ?
A. It is an act of the Spirit of God, wherby we crucify the
flesh, and are crucified to the world and it to us.
Q. Wliat is the vivification of the new man ?
A. An act of the Spirit, whereby we are quickened and raised
up to righteousnesse and newnesse of life.
Q. Which be the parts of oiir vivification 1
A. 1^^, illumination of the mind ; 2*^, inclination of the will ;
3^^, rectification of the affections.
Q. Hoio is the mind inlightened ?
A. By the infusion of spirituall wisdom and understanding
of things to be believed and practised to salvation.
Q. How is the will bowed and inclined ?
A. By the motion of the Holy Ghost, when it is made pliable
and submissive to God's will, and moved to apply things to be
believed, and practise things to be performed.
Q. How are the [affections'] rectified \cind'\ purified ?
A. When the Holy Ghost draweth them from sinfull objects
and sets them on God and the things of God.
Q. Is thus that l7nag[e] of God iv'^^ we lost in Adam restored in
Christ ?
A. Yea, for we lost the knowledge of God, and of heavenly
things, we lost all righteousnesse of the will and conformity with
the will of God, and also all power and holynesse of aff'ections
w^^^ ar all three restored unto us in regeneration by Christ, who
is made unto us of God [wisdom, righteousnesse, and sanctifi-
cation].
m
The a, B, C,
OR
A CATECHISME
FOR YONG CHILDREN
APPOYNTED BY ACT OF THE
CHURCH AND COUNCELL OF
SCOTLAND
M
m
To be learned in all families and
Lector Schooles in the said
Kingdome.
Prov. xxii. 6.
Traine np a child in the way he should goe, and when he is old
he will not depart from it.
«
(^
(^
Printed by Authoritie
1644
Cum Privilegio.
A CATECHISME FOR YONG
CHILDREN.
1. QtL Who made man 1 A. God.
2. Qu. In what estate made he himi A. Perfectly holy in
body and soule.
3. Qu. How fell he from the good estate^ A. By breaking
of the commandement of God.
4. Qu. AVhat punishment followed thairupon 1 A. Death
and condemnatione to him and his posteritie.
5. Qu. How are we deliverid thairfrae 1 ^. By God's free
mercy in Jesus Christ.
6. Qu. What kind of persone is Jesus Christ "? A. He is
very God and very man in one persone.
7. Qu. Why call ye him verie God'? A. Because he is the
eternall Son of God, of one and the selfsame Godhead with the
Father and Holy Ghost.
8. Qu. Why call ye him verie man 1 A. Because hee is like
us in all things, sinne onely except.
9. Qu. Why was he without sinne % A. That hee might bee
ane unspotted sacrifice for sinne.
10. Qu. What hes he done for us] A. He dyed for our
sinnes and rose for our righteousnesse.
11. Qu. Ar all men that perished in Adam saved be Christ ^
A. No, but onely those that hath true faith in him.
12. Qu. What call ye true faith] A. It is the true know-
ledf^e of Jesus Christ with assurance of salvatione in him.
270 A CATECHISME FOR YONG CHILDREN.
13. Qu. Eehearse the Articles of your Faith ?
A. 1. I beleeve in God the Father Almightie, maker of
heaven and earth.
2. And in Jesus Christ, his onely Son our Lord.
3. Who wes conceived of the Holie Ghost ; borne of
the Virgin Marie.
4. SufFerid under Pontius Pilate, wes crucified, dead
and buried, he descended into hell.
5. The third day he rose againe from deathe.
6. He ascended into heaven, and sitteth at the right
hand of God the Father Almightie.
7. From that place sail he come to judge the quick
and the dead.
8. I beleeve in the Holy Ghost.
9. The holy Church universall.
1 0. The communion of saints.
11. The forgivenes of sinnes.
12. The resorrection of the body and lyfe everlasting.
14. Qu. By what meanes doth God's Spirit worke this faith
in yow ? ^. By the Word of God.
15. Qu. What call ye the Word of God? A. The holy
Scripture of the Old and New Testament.
16. Qu. Be what meanes doth God's Spirit confirme this
faith in yow. A. By the same Word and by the sacraments.
17. Qu. What call ye the sacraments? A. They ar visible
signes and seales ordained of God for the confirmatione of my
faith.
18. Qu. How doe they confirme your faith ? A. By receiving
thame as pledgis that Christ crucefied (represented and offered
in thame) is given to me in particular to be my Saviour.
19. Qu. How many sacraments is thair ? A. Two; Baptisme
and the Lord's Supper.
20. Qii. Why wes ye baptized being ane infant? A. That
thereby I might be ingraft in Christ, and enterit in his Church,
which is his mysticall body.
A CATECHISME FOR YONG CHILDREN. 271
21. Qu. What profit have ye by Baptisme now*? A. It
seales up the remissione of my sinnes in Christ's blood ; and
advances the renovation of my heart in his Spirit : which ar
my spirituall washing.
22. Qu. What call ye the Lord's Supper? A. It is the
sacrament of my spirituall nourishment on the body and bloud
of Christ.
23. Qu. How doe ye eat his body and drink his bloud?
A. By beleeving assuredlie that his body wes brokin and his
bloud wes shed for me.
24. Qu. What thankfulnesse owe ye to God for giving his
Son to shed his bloud for yow ? A. 1 ought to denie myselfe
and walk in his Commandements all the dayis of my life.
25. Qu. Rehearse the Commandements ?
A. Hearkin and take heed Israel, for I am the Lord
thy God, who hes brought thee out of the land
of Egypt and out of the house of bondage ;
1. Thou salt have none other Gods but me.
2. Thou salt not make to thyself e any graven image,
nor the likenesse of any thing that is in heaven
above, nor in the earth beneath, nor in the
water under the earth : Thou sail not bow
downe to thame nor worship thame, for I the
Lord thy God am a jealous God, and visiteth
the sinnes of the fathers upon the children
unto the third and fourth generation of thame
that hateth me, and sheweth mercy unto
thousands of thame that love me and keep
my commandements.
3. Thou salt not take the name of the Lord thy
God in vaine : for the Lord will not hold him
guiltlesse that takes his name in vaine.
4. Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath-day ;
sixe days sail thou labour and doe all that
thou hast to doe : but the seventh day is the
Sabbath of the Lord thy God : in it thou
salt do no manner of worke, thou nor thy
272 A CATECHISME FOR YONG CHILDREN.
Sonne, nor thy daughter, thy man-servant nor
thy maid-servant, thy cattell, nor the stranger
; that is within thy gates : for in sixe days the
Lord made heaven and earth, the sea and all
that in them is, and restid the seventh day :
wherefore the Lord blessed the seventh day
and hallowed it.
5. Honour thy father and thy mother that thy
, dayes may be long in the land which the Lord
thy God hath given thee.
6. Thou salt doe no murther.
7. Thou salt not commit adulterie.
8. Thou salt not steale.
9. Thou salt not beare false witnesse against thy
neighbour.
10. Thou salt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou
salt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his
servant, nor his maid, nor his oxe, nor his
asse, nor anie thing that is his.
Lord, have mercie upon us, and write all these lawes in our
hearts, we beseech thee.
26. Qu. Which is the summe and effect of all these Com-
mandements ? A. Thou salt love the Lord thy God with all
thy heart, mind, and strength, and thy neighbour as thyselfe.
27. Qu. Is any man able to doe these things perfitly in this
life ] A. None at all.
28. Qu. Why so? A. Becaus no man is perfitly sanctified
in this life.
29. Qu. Yet must not we prease to a perfectione in fulfilling
of God's commandements % A. Doubtles, for otherwayis thair
is nather faith nor feare of God in us.
30. Qu. What must Ave doe then, when we breake any of
these Commandements 1 A. We must run to God by repent-
ance and prayer.
31. Qu. What call ye repentance? A. It is the turning of
my heart to God with unfained sorrow for offending his majesty,
and a constant resolutione to amend my life.
A CATECHISME FOR YONG CHILDREN. 273
32. Qu. What call ye i)rayer ? A. It is ane incalling of God
in the name of Christ for things belonging to God's glory and
our necessitie.
33. Qu. Why is it not lawfull to pray to creatures as to
Angels and Saints glorified % A. Because God hes commandit
us to worship himselfe alone.
34. Qu. Why must we pray onely in Christ's name?
A. Because he is our onely Mediator and intercessor.
35. Qu. How then sould we pray? A. According to that
patterne of prayer that our Master hes set before us, saying,
when ye pray, say : —
Our Father, which art in heaven :
Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdome come,
Thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven,
Give us this day our daily bread,
And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive thame that
trespasse against us.
And lead us not into tentatione, but deliver us from evill.
For thine is the kingdome, the power, and the glorie, for
ever and ever. Amen.
36. Qu. How ar yee assured that God will heare your
prayers 1 A. 'By Christ's owne word promising that whatever
we aske the Father in his name it sail be given us.
37. Qu. What is the fruit of all this your religione and of
serving God? A. Hereby God is glorified and I am saved,
through Jesus Christ my Lord, to whom be everlasting praise
and glorie. Amen.
274 A CATECHI8ME FOR YONG CHILDREN.
Prayers and Graces for Yong Children,
MOENING PRAYER.
My gratious God, I blesse thee with my whole heart for thy
fatherly providence in watching over me this night : And I
beseech thee to continue thy mercy with me both this day and
the whole course of my life; to the end and in the end; that
being always guided by thy grace and guarded by thy provi-
dence, I may spend this time of my pilgrimage in thy feare and
end it in thy favour; through Jesus Christ, my blessed Lord
and Saviour. Amen.
EVENING PRAYER AT GOING TO BED.
It is of thy undeserved mercy (0 God) that I have passed
this day in safetie without some notable inconvenience in those
infinite dangers, wherein I continually cast myselfe through
my folly. Now, I beseech thee (good Lord), let it please thee
of thy gracious goodness to protect me also this night; and
grant me quiet rest in soule and body that I may better serve
thee in both; through Jesus Christ my gratious Lord and
Saviour. Amen.
/ will both lay me down and sleep, for thou, Lo7'd, only
makes me dwell in safetie. — Ps. iv. 6.
GRACE BEFORE MEAT.
Psal. cxlv. 15.
The eyes of all wait on thee (0 Lord), and thou givest thame
thair meat in dew season : thou openest thy hand and satisfieth
the desire of everie living thing. (Good Lord) blesse us and
those gifts which we receive of thy large liberalitie, through
Jesus Christ our Lord. So be it.
A CATECHISME FOR YONG CHILDREN. 275
Ane Other.
Pardon our sinnes (0 God), and give us thy blessing with
thy benefits, that they may have strength to nourish us, and we
may have grace to serve thee our gratious God in Jesus Christ.
Amen.
GRACE AFTER MEAT.
The God of glorie and peace, who hes created us, redeemed
us, and presently hes fed us, be blissed for now and ever. So
be it.
Ane Other.
Most mightie Lord and most mercifull Father, we yeeld thee
heartie thanks for our bodily sustentation, requiring also most
intirely of thy gratious goodnesse so to feed us with the food
of thy heavenly grace, that we may worthily glorifie thy Name
in this life, and after be partakers of thy everlasting glorie,
through Jesus Christ our Lord. So be it.
Ane Other. — Matt. iv. 4.
Lord, thow hes said it, and we beleeve it, that man lives not
by bread onely, but by every word that proceedis out of thy
mouth : Therefore give us (we beseech thee) thy blessing with
thy benefits, that in the strength of thy blessing, this life being
interteined, we may spend it in thy holy service, till we attaine
to life everlasting, through Jesus Christ our Lord and onely
Saviour. Amen.
To any of these or the like Graces that sail he said after meat, let
these or the like irrayers he added for the Church and for the
King, etc.
God save the Church universall ; God comfort the comfort-
lesse; Lord increase our faith; Lord, for Christ thy Son's
sake, be mercifull to the commonwealths whair thy gospell is
trewly preached and harborie granted to the afflicted members
276 A CATECHISME FOR YONG CHILDREN.
of Christ's body, and illuminate according to thy good pleasure
all nations with the brightnesse of thy word. God save our
most gratious King Charles, our Queene Marie, the hopefull
Prince Charles ; the Lady Elizabeth and her princely progenie ;
guide thow thair hearts (0 God) by thy grace, that they may
rule thy people aright, to the terrour of evill doers and the
comfort of all those that feares the and loves thy truth. Amen.
A BEIEFE OF THE COMMANDS.
Have thow none other gods bot me,
Unto no image bow thy knee,
Tak not the name of God in vaine.
Doe not the Sabbath day prophane.
Honour thy father and mother too,
And sie that thow no murder doe,
From whoredome keep the pure and cleane.
And steale not though thy state be meane.
Sie that thou no false witnesse beare.
And covet not thy neighbouris geare,
Lord, our soules to th6 convert,
And write thy lawes into our heart.
FINIS.
This Catechism was printed in Black Letter on a broad sheet in 1641.
A copy of that edition is in the Library of the British Museum, with
the press-mark ^^^y^. The edition from which this is reprinted is in
Advocates' Library at Edinburgh.
, THE NEW
CATECHISME
ACCORDING
TO THE FORME OF THE KIRK
OF
SCOTLAND
Very profitable and usefull for instructing
of Children and Youth in the
Principles of Religion
Set forth for the generall good
of both Kingdomes
PsAL. 34. II. — Come hither, etc.
Prov. 6. 20, 21 22.— J/j/ somie, etc.
Published by Authority
Printed for H. Perry, and are sold by F. Coules,
in the Old-Baily, 1644.
A second unnumbered leaf contains the usual Alphabets and
Syllabaries on one page, and on the other the royal arms.
THE NEW CATECHISME
ACCORDING TO THE FORM OF
THE KIRK OF SCOTLAND.
Page 1. Question. JVlio made the Hevins and the Earth, and
all things conteined in them ?
Ansiver. God.
Q. Whereof tvas man created ?
A . Of the earth.
Q. To what end was lie made .?
A. To serve God.
Q. How many pinclpall jxirts are they of God's
service ?
A. Foure : Faith, Obedience, Prayer, and Thanks-
giving.
Q. Which is the rule of our faith ?
A. The Word of God, the summe whereof is in
the Articles of the Beliefe.
Q. Which is the rule of our obedience ?
A. The Ten Commandements.
Q. Which is the rule of our Prayer /
A, The Lord's Prayer.
Q. Wiich is the common ride of our thanksgiving ?
A. The Confession at the end of the Lord's
Prayer, For thine is kingdome, imwer, and glory, etc.
280
THE NEW CATECHISME.
Q. In what estate ivas man created ?
A. In the image of God, perfect and holy in soule
and body.
Q. How fell he from that happy estate ?
A. By sin and disobedience.
Q. What ims the occasion thereof 2
A. Satan speaking out of the serpent, tempted
Eva in Paradise, and she persuadit Adam to eat of
the forbidden tree.
Q. What punishment deserved they therefore ?
A. The curse of God and eternall condemnation.
Q. Deserve loe to he jninished for that sin ?
A. Yea : for we sinned in Adam, being in his
loynes, and so we were a part of him.
Q. Who then shall be saved ?
A. Onely they who believe to be saved by Christ.
The 12 Articles of the Belief.
Q. Rehearse the 1 2 Articles of the Belief e 2
A. I believe in God the Father Almighty, etc.
Q. What is conteined in the first article ?
A. Our confidence in a loving and powerfull God.
Q, How many Gods are they ?
A. One.
Q. Hoio many persons are in the Godhead ?
A. Three : God the Father, the Sonne, and the
Holy Ghost.
Q. What is it to believe in God ?
A. To put our whole confidence in him, trusting
that' he wil provide for us in all things needfull for
this life, and the life to come.
THE NEW CATECHISME. 281
Q. How is God our Father ?
A. First by creation, because he made us ; next,
by adoption, and regeneration, through the bloud and
Spirit of Christ.
Q. Why is he called almighty ?
A. Because he may do all things whatsoever he
pleaseth, and he may doe more then he will by his
absolute power ; for of stones he may raise up chil-
dren unto Abraham.
Q. By ivhat icorkes is he knowne to be almighty ?
A. By the making of hevin and earth, and of all
things that are in them.
Q. What conteineth the second article ?
A. The names and stiles of God the Son.
Q. JFhy is he called Jesus ?
A. Because he is our Saviour.
Q. Why is he named Christ ?
A. Because he is annointed our King, Priest, and
Prophet.
Q. What doth he to us as a King ?
A. He governeth us, and defendeth us from our
enemies.
Q. Wiat doth he to us as a Priest ?
A. He hath offered himselfe once in a sacrifice
for our sinneSj.and he intercedeth for us.
Q. What doth he to us as a i^rophet ?
A. He revealeth the will of God to us by the
preaching of his Word, and by his Spirit.
Q. Why is he called the onely Son of God, seeing ice
are his sons by adoption and regeneration ?
A. Because God hath no other sons by nature.
282
THi: NEW CATECHISME.
Q. How is Christ our Lord more 'particularly than of
other creatures ?
A. In that he is our Head, and hath redeemed us
by the price of his bloud.
Q. What kind of person is he ?
A. Very God and very man in one person.
Q. JVliy behoved he to be man ?
A. That he might die for us.
Q. JFhij behoved he to be God in the same j^ersoii ?
A. That he might overcome death, and merit our
salvation.
Q. What conteineth the third article t
A. His coming into this world.
Q. By whom ivas he conceived ?
A. By the Holy Ghost.
Q. Who was his mother that bare him, ?
A. The Virgin Mary.
Q. What conteineth the fourth article .?
A. The sufferings of Christ.
Q. Under tvhat judge tvas he condemned ?
A. Under Pontius Pilate.
Q. TFliat punishment suffered he ?
A, He was crucified.
Q. What is meant by his crucifying ?
A. His hands and feet were nailed to the crosse,
a croune of thornes wounded his head, his backe was
beaten with scourges, a speare pierced his side, and
all the sufferings that accompanied his crosse.
Q. What tvas the event of his sufferings ?
A. He died.
Q. What loas done icifh his body ?
A. It was buried.
THE NEW CATECHISME. 283
Q. What meanefh the words, He descended into hell 2
A. The extremity of his sufferings, wherein his
soule was tormented with the sense of God's wraith,
which is the most horrible bitternesse of hell.
Q. What conteineth the fift article }
A. His resurrection upon the third day after his
death.
Q. What benefit have tve thereby ?
A. In that hee arose from death, we are the more
assured that hee can raise us.
Q. What conteineth the sixt article 'i
A. His farther exaltation unto glory, and the
fruition thereof.
Q. Which are the words of his farther exaltation ?
A. He ascended unto hevin.
Q. Which are the tuords of the fruition of that glory?
A. He sitteth at the right hand of God.
Q. What doth he in hevin for us ?
A. He prepareth a place for us, and intercedeth
for us.
Q. What is expressed in the seventh article .?
A. The coming of Christ unto judgment.
Q. To what end tvill he come to judgment .?
A. To judge the quick and the dead.
Q. Who ivill summon them to appeare before the great
Judge ?
A. The voice of the Archangel, with a terrible
sound of a trumpet.
Q. Where shall every man be placed .?
A. Christ's sheep shall be placed on his right
hand, and the goats on his left hand.
Q. What shall be their reicard ?
A. The godly shall inherit the kingdome of glory.
284
THE NEW CATECHISME.
The wicked shall be punished with everlasting fire
in hell, prepared for the Devill and his angells.
Q. What conteinetli the eight article ?
A. Our confidence in the Holy Ghost.
Q. JFhy is he onely called holy, seeing the Father and
the Son are also holy ?
A. Because he maketh us holy by his immediate
power.
Q. JFhat is conteined in the ninth article ?
A. That a chosen number of people are united to
Christ, and also among themselves, in a spiritual}
fellowship.
Q. How call you this number ?
A. The holy universall kirk.
Q. What is God's kirk ?
A. A society of religious professors called out
from the profaine people of the world.
Q. Why is the kirk called holy, and also called
saints ?
A. Because they are sanctified by the Holy
Ghost.
Q. Why is the kirk called unimrsall ?
A. Because it is gathered out of all sorts of people
in all ages.
Q. Wherein standeth the communion of saints ? '
^. In a common union with Christ their Head,
and among themselves.
Q. By ivhat bonds are wee united to Christ ?
A. By his Spirit, he bindeth us to himselfe, and
by Faith we take hold on him.
Q. By luhat bond are we united among ourselves ?
A. By Christian love.
Q. What vantage have ive of this communion ?
A. Christ and all his benefits are made ours.
THE NEW CATECHISME.
285
Pp. 11 & 12.
As in K.
James's
Bible.
Q. JVhat is confeined in the tenth article ?
A. That all our sins are pardoned.
Q. Hoiv get ive this benefit '{
A. By Faith in Christ, who died for us.
Q. What is mentioned in the eleventh article ?
A. The resurrection of our bodies at the last day.
Q. Is no more meant in it hut arising from death 2
A. We shall also rise from all points of miserie,
as shame, sorrow, pain, hunger, thirst, weaknesse,
and mortality.
Q. Rehearse the fivelfth article ?
A. Life everlasting.
Q. IVliat is included in these ivords ?
A. The fruition of endlesse life, joy, glory, and
of all points of happinesse for ever.
Q. What shall become of the earth, and of the crea-
tures in it, at the last day ?
A. They shall be destroyed with fire, and the
elements shall melt with heat.
Q. What shall succeed in their place ?
A. We look for a new hevin and a new earth,
wherein dwelleth righteousnesse.
The Ten Commandements.
Q. Which is the second pincipall part of God's ser-
vice ?
A. Obedience.
Q. What is obedience ?
A. A keeping of God's commandements.
Q. Bow many commandements are they .?
A. Ten.
Q. Rehearse the Ten Commandements ?
A. I am the Lord, etc.
286
THE NEW CATECHISME.
12.
Q. Hov) many commands are in the first table ?
A. Foure.
Q. JVhat duty is conteined in the first fable ?
A. My duty towards God, which is to love him
with all my heart, with all my soule, and with my
whole strength.
Q. Hoiv many commands cere in the second table ?
A. Six.
Q. What duty is conteined in it ?
A. My duty towards my neighbour.
Q. JVTiat duty is that ?
A. To love him as myselfe.
Q. Unto luhom gave God his laiv ?
A. Unto his people Israel.
Q. JVhere gave he it ?
A. Upon Mount Sinai.
Q. After ivhat manner gave he it ?
A. With a fearfull and horrible voice, and with
the sound of a trumpet.
Q. TFhat shoidd this print in our hearts ?
A. That the taking an account of the transgressors
of the law shall be more terrible at the last day.
Q. TVhat is commanded in the first j^TCcepf ?
A. To love, feare, and reverence God, to beleeve
in him above all things that are most excellent, and
to confesse him before men accordingly.
Q. JVhat is forbidden in it ?
A. We are forbidden, to believe in any other, to
love, feare, or reverence any other above the true
God, or equally with him.
Q. What is commanded in the second precept?
A. To worship God as his own Word hath pre-
scribed.
THE NEW CATECHISME.
287
Q. What is forbidden in it ?
A. Not to worship liim by bowing to any image,
or by any other humane device.
Q. What is commanded in the third precept ?
A. To praise and glorifie God, to honour his
Name, and to speak reverently of his attributes, his
Word, and his works.
Q. What is forbidden in it ?
A. All perjurie, blasphemy, cursing or banning,
vaine and false oaths, all rash and unreverent use of
God's name.
Q. What is commanded in the fourth command ?
A. To spend the Sabbath day solemnly in God's
worship and service.
Q. In ichat service ?
A. In hearing and reading God's Word, in pray-
ing unto God, and praising him, in holy conference,
in hevinly meditations, and in works of piety and
charitie.
Q. What is forbidden in it ?
A. Beside the committing of that which is sin in
itselfe, also all civill labours, judicatories, pastimes
and playes are forbidden.
Q. Why are they forbidden ?
A . Because the doing of them is not a sanctifying
of the Sabbath.
Q. TFJiat is commanded in the fift command .?
A. To honour and obey our naturall Parents,
Eulers, Masters, Pastors, Teachers, and all our Supe-
riours.
Q. What is forbidden in it ?
A. All ungodly ^obedience and unreverent beha-
viour towards them.
Q. What is commanded in the sixt precept ?
A. To take care of the safe tie of our neighbour's
288
THE NEW CATECHI8ME.
health and life, and to take care that he be not hurt
by others ; and therefore to banish away invy,
hatred, malice, contempt of our neighbour, whereby
his hurt is procured.
Q. JVhat is commanded in the seventh ])recept ?
A. To live chastly and soberly in thought, word,
deed, and behaviour.
Q. . JFhat is forbidden in it ?
A. All uncleannesse in our thoughts, words,
deeds, and therefore we should eschew all filthie
speeches, bawclie songs, drunkennesse, gluttony,
wantonnesse, and evill company, which breed un-
lawfull lusts.
Q. IVliat is commanded in, the eight precept ?
A. To be content with the meanes of living
which God gives us in a lawfull way, and to help
others as we are able in their necessity.
Q. JFJiat is forbidden in it ?
A. All covetousness, whereby we take unlawfully
our neighbour's goods and gear, as by oppression or
robberie, or by colour of law, theft, deceipt, by false
measures or false weights.
Q. What is commamled in the ninth precept ?
A. To defend the fame and good name of others,
and to represse reproachfull speeches.
Q. What is forbidden in it ?
A. All lying, slandering, backbiting, all speaking
to the discredit or infamie of others ; all giving
readie eare to calumnies, lies, and reproaches.
Q. What is commanded in the tenth command .?
A. To rejoyce at the prosperity of others, and
when any good is done ; and to be sorry at the hard
condition of others, and when any evill is done.
Q. What is forbidden in it ?
A. All concupiscence, whereby we covet things
THE NEW OATECHISME.
289
which lawfully belong not to us, and whereby we
approve in our hearts the doing of evill, or the hurt
of others.
Q. How cliff ereth the duty of this precept from " the
inward duty of other precepts ?
A. We obey or disobey this precept in our desires,
not intending to execute the thing desired, but in
other precepts the intention concmTeth with the
desire, whether the purpose take ejfifect or not.
Q. Are toe ahle to obey these commandements ?
A. No.
Q. What punishment deserve we for hreaking them ?
A. The curse of God, and endlesse torments in
hell.
Q. How then shall u-e he salved 2
A. By Christ, who died for our sins and rose for
our righteousnesse.
Q. For u'hom died he ?
A. Only for the faithfull.
Q. What is faith?
A. An assurance of God's endlesse favour and
mercy towards us for Christ's sake.
Q. Who ivorketh lively faith in us 2
A. The Holy Ghost, by the hearing of the Word.
Q. By what meanes is our faith confirmed ?
A. By the hearing of the same Word, and by th<^
right using of the sacraments.
Q. Hoiv is lively faith hiowne to he in us ?
A. By true repentance.
Q. JFIiat is repentance 2
A. A sorrow for our bygone sins, and a studying
to good works and amendment of life.
290
THE NEW CATECHISME.
19.
Q. What shall we. do that ive may ohteine lively faith
and true repentance ?
A. We should pray continually that God would
blesse the Word and sacraments, to that effect.
Of Prayer.
Q. Which is the third iwincipall 'part of God\s ser-
vice ? .
A. Prayer.
Q. What is prayer /
A. A seeking from God of things needfull for
setting forth his glor}^, and for supplying our wants.
Q. After tvhat manner should tve pray ?
A. As Christ taught us in the most perfect forme
of prayer.
Q. Behearse the Lord's Prayer i
A. Our Father which art in hevin, 1 Hallowed
be thy name, 2 Thy kingdome come, 3 Thy will be
done in earth, as it is in hevin, 4 Give us this day
our daily bread, 5 And forgive us our trespasses as
we forgive them that trespasse against us, 6 And
lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from
eviil. For thine is the kingdome, the power, and
the glory, for ever and ever. So be it.
Q. Rehearse the preface of the Prayer ?
A. Our Father which art in hevin.
Q. Why call ye God our Father ?
A. To stirre uj) our confidence in his fatherly
love, and to perswade our selves that he will heare
us.
Q. Why say you, tvhlch art in hevin, seeing God is
also in the earth, and in all other places ?
A. That as we speak boldly in calling him Father,
so we reverently honour him in naming the most
glorious place of his residence.
THE NEW CATECHISME. 291
Q. Hov: many loetitions hath this Prayer (
A. Six.
Q. What is confeined in the first three ])etitio7is '(
A. Things that concerne the setting forth of
God's glory.
Q, What is conteined in the last three ?
A. Things that concern man's necessity.
Q. What seeke you in the first petition ?
A. That we should glorifie God in a holy remem-
brance of liis name.
Q. What seeke you in the second jJetition ?
A. That his kingdome may increase in the meanes
of his providence, in the ministerie and increase of
grace, and in hastening the consummation thereof in
glory.
Q. What seeke you in the third petition 2
A. That in doing and suffering we should alwaies
obey his will sincerely and willingly, as the angells
obey his will in hevin.
Q. What seeke yon in the fourth petition .?
A. All things needfull for upholding this present
life.
Q. Why call you them bread 1
A. Because they sustain our life as bread doth.
Q. Why say you, our hread ?
A. Because it should be ours by faithfull labour-
ing in our calling, and by other lawfull meanes.
Q. What seeke you in the fift petition ?
A. Eemission of sins.
Q. Upon what condition seeke you the same ?
A. If we forgive them that sin against us.
292
THE NEW CATECHISME.
Q. IFhy say you our sins, and not my sins, and tchy
include you others uith your selfe so often in this Prayer ?
A. Because we should pray for other, as we do
for our selves.
Q. What seeke you in the sixt jjetition ?
A. That God would keepe us from the tentation
of sinne, and deliver us from the evill of it.
Q. Which is the greatest evill of tentation ?
^. It is such a fearfull estate as Satan by sin
would draw us into, as dispaire, presumption, im-
penitencie, and the wraith of God.
Q. Rehearse the confession imraediately following this
Prayer.
A. For thine is kingdome, power, and glory, for
ever.
Q. Hoiv is this confession a reason perswading us to
^ray ?
A. In that it sheweth God's all sufficiencie and
goodnesse, and so stirreth up our confidence in him.
Q. How is it a rule of our thanksgiving ?
A. In that by using this confession we praise God
for his bountifulnesse.
Q. What meaneth the words, for thine is the kingdome ?
A. That the whole world is God's kingdome of
providence, by an absolute right.
Q. What meaneth the word jpotuer ?
A. That he hath absolute authority and power to
do whatsoever he pleaseth.
Q. What meaneth the word glory l
A. That all good things are effected by his
almighty power in his kingdome of providence, and
so the praise and glory thereof is his.
Q. What meaneth the icord for ever ?
A. That his kingdome, power, and glory are not
limited with time, but are eternall.
THE NEW CATECHISME.
29S
Q. What signifieth the icord Amen 2
A. So be it : that is, Lord, let these my desires
be granted.
Of the Sacraments.
Q. Which is the fourth imnciixdl part of GocVs ser-
vice ?
A. Thanksgiving.
Q. What is thanksgiving?
A. An acknowledgment of the goodnesse of God,
and of his bountifulnesse towards us, and a praising
of God therefore.
Q. Which is the common rule of thanksgiving ?
A. The foresaid confession in the Lord's Prayer.
Q. Which are the rules of solemne thanksgiving in
remembrance that Christ by his death hath ])ur chased
our salvation?
A. The institution of the sacraments.
Q. What is a sacrament ?
A. A representing of Christ's sufferings, and of
the benefits purchased thereby, by outward visible
signes, as Christ hath ordained in his Word.
Q. Hotv many sacraments ordained Christ in the
New Testament ?
A. Two, Baptisme and the Lord's Supper.
Q. What is Baj^tisme ?
A. The seale of the remission of our sins, and of
our regeneration and entrie unto God's kirk.
Q. What signifieth the washing tuith wcder ?
A. That Christ by the merit of his blood, and by
his Spirit, washeth away all our sins.
Q. Declare the meaning of our spirituall washing ?
A. God hath forgiven us all our sins, and renewed
us by his Holy Spirit, because Christ hath shed his
precious blood for us.
294
THE NEW CATECHISME.
24.
Q. IVhat duty did your parents in your name ^^Tomise
at Baptisme ?
A. That I should forsake the Devill, and all his
works, and all the sinfull lusts of the flesh, and be-
leeve all God's Word, which is summarily conteined
in the Articles of the Faith, and live in holinesse all
my lifetime.
Q. What is the Lord's Sufper ?
A. The seale of our daily and spirituall nourish-
ment in God's kirk.
Q. What are the outward elements thereof?
A. Bread and Wine.
Q. What do they represent ?
A. The body and blood of Christ.
Q. What signifieth the breaking of the bread ?
A. The breaking of his body, and all his suffer-
ings.
Q. What signifieth the jJOivreing out of the ivine ?
A. The shedding of his blood.
Q. What signifieth the eating of the liread and drink-
ing of the nine ?
A. The spirituall eating of his body, and drinking
of his blood by faith.
Q. Declare the meaning thereof
A. That is, we should seriously meditate upon
the love and the suff'erings of Christ, and apply them
to us, assuring ourselves that the Sonne of God,
eternall life, happinesse and glory, and all his
benefits, are made ours, through the breaking of his
body and shedding of his blood ; that the sweetness
of this assurance may comfort and strengthen our
soules, as men after
meat and drinke.
long fasting are refreshed by
THE NEW CATECHISME.
295
Q. JFhat eat they and drinke theij, v:ho come v:orthily
to the Lord's Table ?
A. They eat Christ's body, and drinke his blood,
spiritually and sacramentally, and thereby they eat
and drinke their owne salvation.
Q. What eat they and drink they, icho come un-
worthily ?
A. They eat and drink their own damnation.
Q. How shall ice irreimre ourselves that ive may come
ivorthily ?
A. We should try and examine our selves wherein
we have sinned, and humbly, with sorrowfull hearts,
confesse our sins, crying earnestly to God for mercy,
both in secret places and in the publike assembly;
and that we may be assured that God will heare us,
and forgive us, we should forgive them that offend
us ; and seeking the graces of increase of faith and
sanctification, we should resolve and promise by his
grace to live a better life hereafter.
A THANKSGIVING BEFOEE MEAT.
The eyes of all things do look up and trust in thee, Lord.
Thou givest them their meat in due season. Thou openest
thine hand and fillest with thy blessing every living creature.
Good Lord bless us, and these thy gifts, which we receive of
thy bountifull liberality, through Jesus Christ our Lord. So be it.
A THANKSGIVING AFTER MEAT.
The God of glory and peace, who hath created, redeemed,
and sanctified us, and daily doth provide all things needfull for
296 THE NEW CATECHISME.
US, and now presently has fed and refreshed our mortall bodies,
be blessed and glorified, and blesse us and feed us spiritually
unto life eternall through Jesus Christ our Lord. So be it.
Or Say,
The God of all glory and peace, who hath created, redeemed,
and sanctified us, and now presently fed us, be blessed, and bless
us now and evermore. So be it.
F I N I S.
[A copy of the first edition of the Catechism here reprinted is in
the Library x)f the British Museum, and bears the Press-mark
PRINTED BY T. AND A. CONSTABLE, PRINTERS TO HER MAJESTY,
AT THE EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS.
BOOKS PUBLISHED BY
JAMES NISBET & CO
21 BERNERS STREET, W.
DEVOTIONAL AND PRACTICAL
ABIDE IN CHRIST.
Thoughts on the Blessed Life of Fellowship with the Son of
God. By the Rev. Andrew Murray. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d.
"The varied aspects of this practical truth are treated with much freshness, and power,
and unction. It cannot fail to stimulate, to cheer, and to qualify for higher ser\'ice." —
Mr. Spurgeon in the Sword and Trowel.
By the same Author.
LIKE CHRIST.
Thoughts on the Blessed Life of Conformity to the Son of God.
A Sequel to " Abide in Christ." Small Crown Svo. 2s. 6d.
" Everywhere may be felt a depth of devotion, true Scriptural earnestness, together with
an affectionate simplicity." — ChurcJunan.
"The author has written with such loving unction and spiritual insight that his pages
may be read with comfort and edification by all." — Literary CJnirchjiian.
WITH CHRIST IN THE SCHOOL OF PRAYER.
Small Crown Svo. 2s. 6d.
" Contains very valuable thoughts and practical suggestions." — CJuirch Bells.
"A volume of rare excellence, and one which is much needed." — Christian Nezvs.
"It is a book full of noble, tender thoughts, of deep spiritual ^-earning, and of strong
inspiration to those who are seeking to get nearer to Christ." — Christian Conivionwealth.
THE CHILDREN FOR CHRIST :
Tnoughts for Christian Parents on the Consecration of the
Home Life. Small Crown Svo. Price 3s. 6d.
"There is a tone of fervour and devotion pervading the book that contrast pleasantly
with the trivially inane tone some writers think fit to adopt in writing for and about
children. All Sunday School teachers and parents would do well to lay its lessons to
\\(;;« Preface by Dean Goulbukn.
James Nisbet and Co.
IN CHRISTO ; or, The Monogram of St. Paul.
By the Rev. J. R. Macduff, D. D. Crown Svo. 5s.
By the same Author.
CLEFTS OF THE ROCK ; or, The Believer's Grounds of Confi-
dence in Christ.
Crown Svo. 5s.
PALMS OF ELIM ; or, Rest and Refreshment in the Valley.
Crown Svo. 5s.
NOONTIDE AT SYCHAR ; or. The Story of Jacob's WeU.
With Frontispiece and Vignette. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
EVENTIDE AT BETHEL ; or. The Night Dream of the Desert.
Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
THE GRAPES OF ESHCOL ; or. Gleanings from the Land of
Promise.
Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
THE HEALING WATERS OF ISRAEL; or. The Story of
Naaman the Syrian.
Crown Svo. 4s. 6d.
THE SHEPHERD AND HIS FLOCK ; or, The Keeper of Israel
and the Sheep of His Pasture.
Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
MEMORIES OF BETHANY.
With Frontispiece. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
MEMORIES OF GENNESARET.
With Frontispiece. Extra crown Svo. 5s.
MEMORIES OF OLIVET.
With Frontispiece. Crown Svo. 33. 6d.
MEMORIES OF PATMOS ; or, Some of the Great Words and
Visions of the Apocalypse.
With Frontispiece. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
RIPPLES IN THE TWILIGHT.
Fragments of Sunday Thought and Teaching. Small crown
Svo. 28.
Books published by
CAST THY BURDEN ON THE LORD.
A Scripture Text Book. By the Rev. J. R. Macduff, D.D.
Printed in Red and Black. 32mo. is. Paper Cover, 6d.
By the same Author.
STRENGTH FOR THE DAY.
A Daily Book in the Words of Scripture for Morning and
Evening, With an Introduction. i6mo. is. 6d.
VOICES OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD AND SHADOWS OF
THE GREAT ROCK.
Square i6mo. is. 6d.
THE MORNING AND NIGHT WATCHES.
In one vol. i6mo. and 32mo. is. 6d. Separately ; is. each.
THE FAITHFUL PROMISER.
32mo. 6d. Paper Cover, 4d.
THE MORNING AND NIGHT WATCHES AND FAITHFUL
PROMISER.
In I Vol. i6mo. 2s.
EVENING INCENSE.
Royal 32mo. is.
ALTAR STONES :
Original Hymns for Plain Readers. i6mo. 8d. Paper Cover, 6d.
ALTAR INCENSE :
Comprising Morning Watches, Evening Incense, and Altar
Stones. i6mo. 2s. 6d.
THE MIND AND WORDS OF JESUS.
In one vol. i6mo and Royal 32mo. is. 6d. Separately; is.
each.
THE THOUGHTS OF GOD.
i6mo. IS. 6d. 32mo. is.
THE THOUGHTS OF GOD AND THE WORDS OF JESUS.
In I Vol. i6mo. is. 6d.
WILLOWS BY THE WATERCOURSES ; or, God's Promises to
the Young.
A Text-Book for Children. 64mo. 6d. Paper Cover, 3d.
THE PLOUGHMAN'S TEXT-BOOK.
64mo. '6d. Paper Cover, 4d.
James Nisbet and Co.
THE SOLDIER'S TEXT-BOOK ; or, Confidence in Time of War.
By the Rev. J. R. Macduff, D.D. 641110. 6d. Paper Cover,
3d. Tuck, IS. 6d.
THE SAILOR'S TEXT-BOOK.
By the Rev. J. R. Macduff, D.D. 641110. 6d. Paper Cover,
3d. Tuck, IS. 6d.
LINKS OF LOVma KINDNESS :
Words of Hope and Consolation for the Flock of Christ. By
the Rev. George Everard, M.A. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d.
By the same Aicthor.
THE BELLS OF ST. PETER'S.
And other Papers on Gospel Truth. i6nio. is.
HIS STEPS TRACED FROM THE GREAT BIOGRAPHY.
Practical Readings on the Life of our Lord. Crown 8vo. is. 6d.
HOME SUNDAYS ; or, Help and Consolation from the Sanc-
tuary.
Small crown 8vo. 3s.
YOUR SUNDAYS.
Being Fifty-two Short Readings, especially intended for School-
boys. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d.
THE BROOK BESOR.
Words for those who must tarry at Home. By Andrew A.
Bonar, D.D. i6mo. gd. Paper Cover, 6d.
HEAVENLY THOUGHTS FOR MORNING HOURS.
Selections in Prose and Verse, with Passages from Scripture.
With a Short Introduction. By the late Lady Catherine Long. i6mo.
2s. 6d. cloth ; 4s. 6d. silk.
By the same Author.
HEAVENLY THOUGHTS FOR EVENING HOURS.
i6mo. 2s. 6d. cloth ; 4s. 6d. silk.
SUNRISE GLEAMS.
A Series of Daily Readings for a Month. By Lady Hope.
i6mo. IS.
By the same Author.
SUNSET RAYS.
A Companion Volume to " Sunrise Gleams." i6mo. is.
Books published by
HOUR BY HOUR ; or, the Believer's Daily Life.
Compiled by E. A. L. Square i6mo. Gilt edges. 2s. 6d.
" One of the best of the many 'Daily Helps.' " — Christian.
DAILY STEPS UPWARD.
Scripture Texts for Every Day of the Year. i6mo. 2s. 6d.
DAILY EVENING REST ; or, Thoughts of Peace about the
Master.
By Agnes Giberne. i6mo. 2s. 6d.
THE VOICE OF JESUS DAY BY DAY.
With Original Hymns. By F. M. Macrae, And an Intro-
duction by Hugh Macmillan, D.D. Small Crown 8vo. 2s.
LEADERS.
By E. C. Daubeny. Third Edition. 64mo, gilt edges, is.
_" These Leaders may be of service, not only as portions for private reading, but as selected
portions which have been found useful for Bible Readings, District Meetings, &c."
THE WELL IS DEEP ; or. Scripture Illustrating Scripture.
Arranged as Morning and Evening Bible Readings, for every
Day in the Year. 32mo. 2s. 6d.
COUNSEL AND MIGHT :
Prayers and Meditations. Adapted from Sermons by the Very
Rev. C. J. Vaughan, D.D., Dean of Llandaff, and Master of the Temple.
Compiled by R. N. C. Square i6mo. is.
THE GATES OF PRAYER.
A Book of Private Devotion for Morning and Evening. By the
Rev. J. R. Macduff, D.D. i6mo. is. 6d.
IN SECRET.
A Manual of Private Prayer. By the Rev. George
EvERARD, M.A. i6mo. is.
SHORT PRAYERS FOR PRIVATE USE.
By D. F. Spriggs, D.D. i6mo. is.
PRAYERS COMPILED BY A FATHER FOR THE USE OF
HIS CHILDREN.
With some advice on Praying. i6mo. is.
James Nisbet and Co,
COMMUNION MEMORIES.
The Record of some Sacramental Sundays : With Meditations,
Addresses, and Prayers suited for the Lord's Table. By the Rev. J. R.
Macduff, D.D. With Frontispiece. Crown 8vo. 6s.
BENEATH THE CROSS.
Counsels, Meditations, and Prayers for Communicants. By the
Rev. George Everard, M.A. i6mo. is.
THE HOLY TABLE : A Guide to the Lord's Supper.
By the Rev. George Everard, M.A. 6d. Paper cover, 4d.
COMMUNICANT'S SPIRITUAL COMPANION :
With Meditations and Helps for Prayer Suitable for the Subject.
By the Rev. T. Haweis, LL.D. With an Essay by the Ven. B. Philpot,
late Archdeacon of the Isle of Man. 32mo. is.
THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD'S SUPPER EXPLAINED
IN SIMPLE LANGUAGE, WITH MEDITATIONS AND
PRAYERS.
By G. B. Author of ' ' Practical Commentaries on the Gospels,
&c. Fcap. 8vo. IS.
ILLUSTRATIVE SCRIPTURE READINGS.
A ^Manual for Visitation and Devotion. By the Rev. T. E.
Cozens Cooke. i6mo. 2s. cloth ; roan, 3s.
THE VISITOR'S BOOK OF TEXTS; or, The Word brought
Nigh to the Sick and Sorrowful.
By the Rev. Andrew A. Bonar, D.D. Small crown 8vo,
3s. 6d.
THE CHRISTIAN VISITOR'S TEXT BOOK.
By the Rev. Charles Neil, M.A. Crown 8vo. 2s.
GEMS FROM THE BIBLE.
Being Selections Convenient for Reading to the Sick and Aged.
Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d.
HINTS TO HOSPITAL AND SICK ROOM VISITORS.
By Mrs. Colin G. Campbell. Small crown Svo. is. 6d.
MESSAGES OF GRACE.
Being Tracts in Large Type for the Sick and Aged. By the
Rev. H. Bonar, D.D. Post Svo. Two vols. Cloth limp, 2s. 6d.
Books published by
SICK ROOM MEDITATIONS ; or, Alone with God.
By the Rev. F. Cross, D.D., LL.D., Author of "Evangel,"
&c. 5s.
GLEAMS FROM THE SICK CHAMBER.
Arranged in Daily Readings for a Month. By the Rev. J. R.
Macduff, D.D. Small Crown 8vo. 2s.
By the same Author.
GLEAMS FOR THE SICK CHAMBER :
Being Daily Texts for a Month. On a Roll. 2s.
THE FIRST BEREAVEMENT.
32mo. 6d.
EARLY GRAVES :
A Book for the Bereaved. Crown 8vo. 5s.
WELLS OF BACA ; or, Solaces for the Christian Mourner.
i6mo. IS.
THE BOW IN THE CLOUD ; or, Words of Comfort for Hours
of Sorrow.
THE NIGHT OF WEEPING ; or. Words for the Suffering Family
of God.
By the Rev. Horatius Bonar, D.D. i6mo. is. 6d. Also
a Large Type edition. Crown 8vo. 2s.
THE MORNING OF JOY.
A wSequel to "The Night of Weeping." By the Rev.
Horatius Bonar, D.D. i6mo. is. 6d.
OUR ANGEL CHILDREN.
By Rhoda. Dedicated to all Parents, rich and poor, gentle
and simple, who have little ones in Heaven. Small crown Svo. is. 6d.
WORDS OF COMFORT FOR BEREAVED PARENTS.
Edited by William Logan. With Sketch of his Life. By the
Rev. John Ker, D.D. 25th Thousand. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
"A richer treasury of consolation in human words could hardly be compiled." — North
American Review.
"A most beautiful and blessed book. The volume has no rival, and is one which no
Christian should lack." — London Q7carterty Review.
THE WIDOW'S PORTION ; or, Daily Bread for the Bereaved.
Royal 8 vo. 2s. 6d.
James Nisbet and Co.
MAN'S DEPARTURE AND THE INVISIBLE WORLD :
A collection of Opinions and Facts. By G. H. H. Olithant
Ferguson. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d.
"A compilation made from wide reading, with sound judgment, on a subject upon
which the greatest writers have said their greatest things." — Truth.
''A vahiable book. The writer's appeal to his readers at the end is very simple, earnest,
and impressive." — Record.
OUR FRIENDS IN HEAVEN ; or, The Mutual Recognition of
the Redeemed in Glory Demonstrated.
By the Rev. J. M. Killen, D.D. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d.
SHALL WE KNOW THEM AGAIN ?
Thoughts on the Subject of Recognition in a Future State.
With Portraits and other Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d.
NOT LOST, BUT GONE BEFORE :
Voices of the Departed. Square i6mo. is. 6d.
RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS IN HEAVEN :
Consisting of Contributions by the late Bishop ROBERT
BiCKERSTETH, J. B. OWEN, M.A., A. M'AUSLANE, NORMAN MaCLEOD,
D.D., R. C. Dillon, D.D., John Burnet, D.D., &c., &c. Crown 8vo.
3s. 6d.
CONSECRATED RECREATION: or, The Christian's Leisure
Time.
By the Rev. Ernest Boys, M.A. i6mo. is.
THE CONSECRATED LIFE ; or. Thoughts on Practical Religion.
By the Rev. Ernest Boys, M.A. i6mo. is.
MY LORD'S MONEY ; or. The Consecration of Talents.
A Sequel to " The Consecrated Life." By the Rev. Ernest
Boys, M.A. i6mo. is.
THE CULTURE OF PLEASURE; or, The Enjoyment of Life
in its Social and Religious Aspects.
By the Author of " The Mirage of Life." Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d.
CONGRATULATIONS AND COUNSELS.
A Book for Birthdays. By Felix Friendly. Square i6mo.
Gilt edges, is. 6d.
THE WEDDING RING.
A Marriage Register on the plan of " The Birthday Text-Book."
With suitable Selections from our best Authors, and blank Spaces for Names,.
&c. i6mo. 2s. 6d.
Books published by
DAY BY DAY; or, Counsels to Christians on the Details of
Every-Day Life.
By the Rev. George Everard, M.A. Crown 8vo. 3s. A
cheaper Edition. i6nio. is. 6d.
By the same Author.
NOT YOUR OWN ; or, Counsels to Young Christians.
i6mo. IS.
MY SPECTACLES:
And What I saw with Them. i6mo. is.
LITTLE FOXES :
And How to Catch Them. i6mo. is.
FOLLOW THE LEADER.
i6mo. IS. 6d.
SAFE AND HAPPY.
Words of Help and Encouragement to Young Women. With
Prayers for Daily Use. i6mo. is.
STRONG AND FREE.
A Book for Young Men. i6mo. is. 6d. Limp. is.
BRIGHT AND FAIR.
A Book for Young Ladies. i6mo. is.
UP HIGH :
Friendly Words to those Within and to those Without the Fold
of Christ. i6mo. is. 6d.
EVERY EYE.
Crown 8vo. 2s.
STEPS ACROSS ; or, Guidance and Help to the Anxious and
Doubtful.
Crown 8vo. 3s.
THE WRONG TRAIN ; or, Common Mistakes in Religion.
Crown Svo. is. 6d.
OUR WEDDING DAY.
32mo. 6d. Paper Cover. 2d.
James Nishet and Co.
ABOUT OURSELVES.
By ]Mrs. Henry Wood, Author of " East Lynn," &c. Crown
Svo. IS. 6d.
By the same Attthor. Crown Svo. is. 6d. each.
BESSY WELLS. I OUR CHILDREN.
THE MESSAGE OF CHRISTIANITY ; or, A Word to the Busy.
By the Rev. William Landels, D.D. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d.
By the same Author.
EVERY DAY RELIGION.
Crown Svo. 4s. 6d.
THE PATH OF LIFE ; or, The Nature, Origin, and Reception
of Salvation.
Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
TRUE MANHOOD ; its Nature, Foundation, and Development.
A Book for Young Men. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
WOMAN'S SPHERE AND WORK.
Considered in the Light of Scripture. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
RIGHTS AND WRONGS ; or, Begin at Home.
By Mrs. Gordon, Author of " Work, Plenty to Do, and How
to Do it. " Crown Svo. 2s. 6d.
IS IT POSSIBLE TO MAKE THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS ?
A Book for Young Men. By the Rev. Thomas Binney.
Crown Svo. 2s. 6d.
By the same Author.
FROM SEVENTEEN TO THIRTY.
The Town Life of a Youth from the Country : its Trials,
Temptations, and Advantages. Lessons from the Life of Joseph. Crown Svo.
IS. 6d.
QUIT YOU LIKE MEN.
A Book for Young Men. By C. F. Dowsett. Svo. is.
Paper cover, 6d.
LIFE LOST OR SAVED.
By Selina Ditcher. Crown Svo. 2s. 6d.
THE SETTLED DOCTRINE OF OUR CHURCH.
By M. E. SuRTEES Allnatt. Crown Svo. 3s. 6d.
Books published by James Nisbet and Co.
CHURCH ORDINANCES FROM THE LAYMAN'S STAND-
POINT.
By Major Seton Churchill. Third Edition. Crown 8vo.
2s. 6d.
STEPPING-STONES TO HIGHER THINGS.
By Major Seton Churchill. Fifth Edition. Crown 8vo.
2s. 6d.
THE KING'S COIN ; or, God's Fraction.
By the Rev. Thomas J. Bass. With an Introduction by the
Dean of Canterbury. Small crown 8 vo. is. 6d.
GOLD AND THE GOSPEL ; or, The Scriptural Duty of Giving
in Proportion to Means and Income.
Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d.
THE LORD'S PURSE-BEARERS.
By Hesba Stretton. Seventh Thousand. Crown Svo. is. 6d.
WOUNDED IN THE HOUSE OF HIS FRIENDS.
By Florence Moreton. i6mo. is.
LONDON :
JAMES NISBET & CO.j 21 BERNERS STREET, W.