A COMMENTARY THE SONG OF SONGS, FROM A^ JINT AND MEDIEVAL SOURCES. RICHARD FREDERICK LITTLEDALE, LL.D., D.C.L. LONDON : JOSEPH MASTEES, ALDERSQATE STREET, AND NEW BOND STREET. NEW YORK : POTT AND AMERY. MDCCOLXIX. LONDON : PRINTED BY JOSEPH MASTERS AND SON, ALDERSGATE STREET. IN DEAR MEMORY OF JOHN MASON NEALE. PEE FACE. The Song of Songs, though for many centuries a favourite theme of the most eminent Saints and Chris- tian writers, either by way of direct comment or of illustrative quotation, has fallen, during these latter times, into comparative neglect. It is rarely made the basis of sermons, or even of devotional treatises, and thus, as may be reasonably inferred, does not occupy any prominent place in private study of Holy Scripture. Two attempts, both most valuable in their way, to reinstate it in its proper position as an element of re- ligious teaching, and as affording ample subject-matter for practical meditation, have been recently made. The first is the well-known translation of Avrillon's devout book, L'Annee Affective ; the second is the series of Sermons in a Religious House, preached by the late Dr. Neale. But the plan of each of these works excludes com- pleteness of treatment, and leaves much of the ground still uncovered. Nor do any of the commentaries usually accessible supply the defect. The mystical exegesis, which is of the very essence of any true under- standing of perhaps the most difficult book in Scripture, VI PREFACE. was either quite foreign to the temperament and method of the expositors ; or when some genuine feeling of sympathy with patristic theology did manifest itself, as, for example, in the writings of Matthew Henry, the in- fluence of eighteenth-century modes of thought, and the fear of being altogether out of harmony with the readers of their time, cramped and enfeebled their utterance. It is only seven years since the late Mr. Thrupp en- deavoured to revive intelligent interest in the religious study of the Canticles through the means of the devout and scholarly gloss which he published. But, while he admitted the trutli of the main outlines of the tra- ditional interpretation, he exhibited much timidity in following up the details, a timidity all the more re- markable when contrasted with the boldness with which he proposed conjectural emendations of the Hebrew text. His volume, therefore, though very useful in its degree to students, does not appear to have suc- ceeded in its higher aim, that of promoting reverent perusal of the Canticles amongst the educated laity. Nor could this class obtain assistance from foreign sources. Apart from colossal works like those of Ghislerius and Cornelius a Lapide, there is no book which presents in a compendious form the pith of ancient and mediaeval exposition on the Song ; though there are, no doubt, many, like that of Hamon the Port- Eoyalist and the briefer composition of S. Francis de Sales, which may be read with interest and profit. The following Commentary is an attempt to fill this void, at least provisionally, until some more competent hand undertakes the task. Its chief claim to atten- tion is that it is almost exclusively a compilation from PREFACE. Vll the writings of the Fathers and Schoolmen, with just so much illustration from ascetic writers, hymnodists, and poets, ancient and modern, as seemed to give point to their comments, and to make the continuous perusal of the volume an easier task. An attempt to bring to bear on the Canticles all the appropriate matter which exists, would simply have been to aim at turning into this one channel all the streams of the devotional theology of the Middle Ages, and would have defeated the intention with which the Commentary was undertaken, that of summarizing in brief and portable compass the results of seventeen centuries of loving meditation on the Book of Divine Love. This work, therefore, does not aim, like the larger compilations already referred to, at making clerical readers independent of further study on the subject. Rather it is hoped that the extracts from the writings of Origen, S. Bernard, Gilbert of Hoyland, Henry Harphius, and others like-minded, may incite them to fuller perusal. But it does propose to give other students of the Canticles, and especially the inmates of Religious Houses (for whose instruction it was originally projected) a sufficient, though necessarily brief, insight into the treasures which have accumu- lated, in the course of centuries, around this shrine of sacred mysteries. To further this end, a sugges- tion made by a critic of the Commentary on the Psalms, too late so far as the plan of that work w^as concerned, has been here adopted, namely, the addi- tion of English versions to the Greek and Latin quotations which occur in the course of the work. As these have been somewhat hastilv executed, thev Vlll PREFACE. are consequently not a little rugged, and aim merely at giving the sense approximately, without pretending to any literaiy excellence. It would have been most desirable if a Commen- tary such as this, not designed for critical pur- poses, but of a purely devotional character, could have been kept absolutely free from polemical matter, yet, as the spiritual character of the Canticles has been freely impeached in our day, it has been necessary to make some protest against the method and arguments of its impugners ; but this has been excluded so far as possible from the text, and relegated to the Intro- duction, in which a few of the literary problems con- nected with the Song of Songs are briefly discussed. It remains only to request a lenient judgment on this tentative execution of a most difficult task, and to ask for such assistance at the hands of readers as may make a future edition, should it be required, less defective. London, Nativity of Our Lady, 1869. INTRODUCTION. I. The exceptional position occupied by the Song of Songs among the books of Holy Writ, standing as it does apart from Law and Prophets, Histories and didactic compositions, and having obviously on the sur- face but very faint relations to the remaining Scriptural Canticles, has naturally concentrated much attention upon it, and given rise to no little variety of comment on all the particulars connected with its external form and history, and its internal signification. One fact alone remains undisputed, that of its inclusion within of'th?song. the Canon, both Jewish and Christian, from the earliest times of which we have any record. Its place in the Septuagint testifies to its recognition as a sacred book by the Jews two centuries before the Christian era, and the language used concerning it by Kabbinical autho- rities puts it on a very different level from that accorded by them to the Deutero-Canonical Books. They classed it as one of the five Megilloth of the Bible, along Rabbinical with Euth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, and Esther, and of^"^**® ranked it first among them, reading it at the Passover, the most solemn festival of the year. Fully in accord- ance with this position is the remark of Eabbi Akiba, a contemporary of the Emperor Hadrian, saying, " The entire history of the world does not present an epoch like the day when the Song of Songs was given to Israel, for though all the Hagiographa are holy, yet the Song of Songs is most holy." The corollary from these premises is that the Canticles have been regarded h INTRODUCTION. refuted. all along as the work of an inspired writer, and as instinct with a spiritual meaning; both which views are explicitly asserted by the Targum, which begins its paraphrase with the words : " The songs and praises which Solomon the Prophet, king of Israel, spake by the Holy Ghost, before the Lord the Creator of the universe." First objec- It has been objected in modern times against the ticaiv^ew^^' ^^^^o^d admission by the ancient Jews of a mystical import underlying the letter, that they prohibited the perusal of the Canticles by all persons below thirty years of age, whence it has been argued either that the book was given in vain so far as all who died in youth were concerned, or that the very fact of with- holding it establishes the denial of its spiritual cha- racter. This objection, apart from its failing to settle whether the Jews were right or wrong in their disci- pline on this head, falls to the ground for two reasons ; first, that the Kabbins extended the same prohibition to the beginning of Genesis and the earliest and latest chapters of Ezekiel, without any impeachment of their inspiration; and secondly, that the Eastern Church, like the Church of England, while avowedly upholding the mystical sense, refrains, on grounds of expediency, from public reading of the Canticles in divine worship, though the place of the book in the Old Testament Canon, as received by Christians, has been acknow- ledged ever since the earliest known list Avas drawn up by Melito, Bishop of Sardis, about a.d. 170. 11. The questions of date and authorship have both been hotly contested. The prevalent opinion amongst Jews and Christians until comparatively recent times, agreed with that of the Targum and Septuagint, and other ancient versions, in ascribing the Song to Solo- mon, son of David. There were, however, some ex- ceptions. Some Talmudists assigned it to Hezekiah, E. Kimchi and a few others to Isaiah. On the other hand, the received tradition is supported by some important arguments. Apart from the title, which may of course have been added by a later hand (as is doubtless the case with several of the Psalms,) and Date and authorship INTRODUCTION. XI from direct references to Solomon as a living person, which might be only poetical, there are two items of internal evidence which fix the date with tolerable internal GviQcncc accuracy. Pirst is the passage in chap. vi. 4, " Thou art beautiful, my love, as Tirzah, comely as Jeru- salem." Tirzah, as the capital of the Northern king- dom under Jeroboam I. and his successors until the building of Samaria, (1 Kings xiv. 17 ; xv. 21 ; xvi. 8, 23,) would never have been coupled with Jerusalem, the head of the Davidic and Aaronic polity, by a poet of either Israel or Judah after the revolt of the ten tribes, owing to the political and religious hostility which immediately arose between the two realms, just as no poem before the union of the English and Scottish crowns praises both London and Edinburgh. Thus the furthest possible limit of date is the outbreak of war between Abijah and Jeroboam in B.C. 958. Another passage narrows the period much more. The eighth verse of the same chapter tells us of Solomon's harem, " There are threescore queens and fourscore concubines." But in 1 Kings xi. 3, we read, " And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hun- dred concubines." Wherefore we conclude that the Song was not only written in Solomon's life-time, but at a comparatively early period of his reign, before he had fallen into the extravagant excesses of his old age. The plea which would deny the authenticity of the passage of the Book of Kings, treating it as a mere ex- aggeration of later times, to be corrected by the more reasonable estimate of the Canticles, may be dismissed at once, apart from any question of inspu'ation, as neither justified by what we know of the manners of Eastern sovereigns nor by the treatment which two equally compatible statements would receive if found in the pages of a secular historian. So far as style and diction are concerned, tlie chief modern critics are agreed in attributing the Song of Songs to the Solo- monic age, in opposition to a somewhat earlier school, which post-dated it considerably, on grounds now ad- mitted to be insufficient. In the absence of direct internal evidence and of 62 XU INTRODUCTION. historical testimony at all coeval witli the date of the composition, it is impossible to lay down as a cer- tainty that Solomon was author of the Song. But there is, at the very least, quite as much to be said in ProbabiUty favour of the earliest known tradition as can be urged authorship,^ against it. The title goes for something, for it esta- blishes that at the very remote period when it was affixed, — earlier at any rate than the LXX. version — no rival claimant had been effectually set up. Those who deny the Solomonic authorship urge that such an epithet as *' Song of Songs" makes against the claim, because no author would venture on such a panegyric of his own work. The reply to this is two- from the fold. The critics must either accept the inscription as title; synchronous with the poem, or reject it. If they accept the genuineness of the name " Song of Songs," they must take the remainder of the title into account also, and admit Solomon's claim. If they reject the whole inscription as a later interpolation, then Solo- mon is not to be charged with having qualified his poem with any epithet at all, and the count fails. And this without taking into account a further con- sideration, that of the inspired character of the book ; since, if Solomon was divinely instructed what to write, there can be no more personal vanity in his using the title "Song of Songs" than there is blasphemy in a Prophet beginning a sentence with " Thus saith the Lord." There would be, at the outset, something from author- Unaccountable in the total loss of the most copious ship of other class of writings of the wisest and most powerful of ' Hebrew kings. Most copious, because the thousand and five songs attributed to him in 1 Kings iv. 32, must have necessarily exceeded in bulk those three thousand proverbs, of which such important remains exist. It is not unreasonable to suppose that the great majority of these poems were of merely passing and secular interest, but it is difficult to conjecture why utter oblivion should have come on them all, as the negation of his authorship in this case requires its supporters to maintain. This difficulty, no light one in face of the preservation of so many songs of David INTRODUCTION. XIU and Asaph, is more readily solved by acceptance of the traditional view than by any other means. The next plea in Solomon's favour is of small weight independently, but not without importance in a cumu- lative argument. He is praised, in the same passage which mentions the number of his writings, for his ^°"^ ^^^^ of great skill in natural history : " And he spake of trees, history; from the cedar tree that is in Lebanon even unto the hyssop that springeth out of the wall : he spake also of beasts, and of fowl, and of creeping things, and of fishes." (1 Kings iv. 33.) There is no book of Scrip- ture which dwells so much as the Canticles upon natural imagery, or which mentions so many names of animals and plants in terms implying familiarity with their habits. The only reply which has been sug- gested to this plea is that other people may have known these things as well as Solomon. No doubt ; but the real point at issue, that the internal evidence is so far perfectly consistent with the traditional au- thorship, is not in the least weakened by such a demurrer. The like may be said of the analogies of and from idea and diction, admittedly existing between Proverbs w^fi°^o! and Canticles.^ They do not fix with certainty the verbs, parts of the Book of Proverbs which are due to Solo- mon's pen, nor do they give any clue to the priority of date in either case. But allowing, as all do, that Solomon is author of part of the Proverbs, the coin- cidences lend additional weight to the traditional view, and, as must never be forgotten in discussions of the kind, make the burden of disproof heavier for the contesters of the claim in possession. Two other pleas are urged against Solomon from Further opposite sides. Those who allow the spiritual inter- objections, pretation of the Song maintain that Solomon was not morally fitted to be the instrument of such teaching, w^hile those who adhere to the newest modern literal ' Cant. i.ll=Prov. XXV. 11; Cant. iv. 5 = Prov. v. 1 9 ; Cant, iv. 9 = Prov. i. 9; Cant. iv. 11 = Prov. V. 3, xvi. 24 ; Cant. iv. 12 = Prov. V. 15; Cant. v. l = Prov. ix. 6; Cant. v. 2 = Prov. XX. 13 ; Cant. v. 6=Prov. i. 28 ; Cant. vii. 1 = Prov. xxv. 12; Cant. vii. 9 = Prov. xxiii. 31 ; Cant. viii. 7 = Prov. vi. 31 —35, &c. XIV INTRODUCTION. view regard tlie poem as in some degree a satire against him, and therefore certainly not from his pen. The second of these objections will be considered later, while it is enough to say of the first one that it loses sight on the one hand of the admitted discrepancy between the youth and age of Solomon, to the former of which the Song may more probably be ascribed ; and on the other of the frequent instrumentality of sinners in working out the designs of God, of which the pro- phecy of Balaam and the apostolate of Judas are sufficient examples. III. The third question, and that which has been most eagerly contested of all, concerns the interpreta- tion of the Song, whether it is to be mystical, alle- gorical, or literal, and in each of these cases what is the method to be followed. As before, there is a traditional view in possession, which has the pleas of remote antiquity, continuous tenure, and perfect con- sistency with itself in its favour. This view, common to the Talmud and Targum and to all Christian writers (with a brief exception to be noticed presently) for sixteen centuries, is that the poem is wholly mystical, with no historical basis whatsoever, and that it denotes the relations between God and His Church, albeit there is much variety of detail in setting forth the particulars of this relation. An intermediate view supposes an historical foundation for the Song, preferably the bridal of Solomon with Pharaoh's daughter, and holds that a superstructure of religious allegory has been raised on this basis, as in that other case of the Exodus, so frequently used as a type of spiritual deliverance from sin. And a third view, almost exclusively modern, denies all inner meaning to the poem, save of the most incidental kind, and maintains a literal exposition. The mystical interpretation, which forms the subject- matter of the commentary in this volume, and which traces the history of the Divine dealings with man under the Law and the Gospel, has in its favour a cumulative mass of evidence of a very cogent nature. In the first place, the relationship of marriage is very frequently used in Scriptui'e to denote the union be- INTRODUCTION. XV tween God and the chosen people, the ornaments of a bride and abundant progeny are the promised rewards of devotion and obedience, barrenness and divorce are the threatened punishments of spiritual adultery. There is thus no antecedent improbability, as has been alleged, in the nuptial imagery of the Song having a mystical signification. This comes out most clearly in from the that Book which has most obviously approached, if sJifpture °^ not actually borrowed, the language of the Canticles, namely, the prophecy of Hosea, in which the marriage of God to Israel, and her sins against the nuptial bond, are steadily dwelt upon. A further illustration is afforded by the language of the forty -fifth Psalm, which represents a King, who is styled Lord and God, as the Spouse of a Virgin Bride, and which is directly applied to Christ in the Epistle to the Hebrews. As the structure of this Psalm, like that of the seventy-second, absolutely forbids its literal application to any mere human sov-^^-^-^^^-l'^ ran, save at the hands of those who are resolved to see no Messianic prophecies in the Old Testament, be the evidence wdiat it may, it contributes a most im- portant item of proof to the tenability of the tradi- tional view. This is further borne out by the Gospels, the Pauline Epistles, and the Eevelation. The Baptist speaks of Christ as the Bridegroom, and of himself as the Bridegroom's friend ; while the Saviour, in defending His disciples from the charge of religious laxity, applies the name Bridegroom to Himself, and that of "children of the bridechamber" to His fol- lowers. S. Paul illustrates the metaphor further by declaring that he has "espoused" his converts "as a chaste virgin, to Christ," and that earthly marriage is only a type of a heavenly mystery. The Apocalypse, with its description of the heavenly Jerusalem as the Bride of the Lamb, and of the final triumph of the re- deemed as His marriage feast, completes the chain of Scriptural evidence ; and if the mystical interpretation of the Canticles be set aside, it becomes exceedingly difficult to explain the use of this peculiar imagery, which cannot be traced to any other source. The plea that not marriage, but courtship, which XVI INTRODUCTION. leads to marriage, is the scope of the Song, has been urged against the Catholic view, but vainly in the face of the recurrent phrase "the Virgin of Israel" in the Old Testament, and the clear statement of the New that the marriage has not yet come, and only the be- trothal has taken place. The next argument of weight is that which serves to repel the a priori objections taken to the form and diction of the poem as a vehicle for spiritual ideas. If it could be shown that the Song, if mystically explained, is an isolated pheno- from parai- mcnon, having no parallel in any literature, very much lelsinArabic , , ' , ° A y. ' . *' . and Persian wouicl DC done towards discrediting the ancient view, literature; ]g^|^ g^^^,^ jg ^^^ ^]^g ^^gg^ rj^j^^ j^^,^^ nation, which in blood and language is most nearly allied to the He- brews, has preserved to the present day the custom of chanting in public worship songs in which the religious meaning is veiled under the ordinary terms of earthly love. The service at which these are recited is called a Zikr, the poems themselves (usually in honour of Mohammed) tmiweskskak. On this, Mr. Lane, in his Modern Egyptians, chap. xxiv. writes as follows : " He pointed out the following poem as one of those most Songs at common at Zikrs, and as one which was sung at the zikrs. 2ikr which I have begun to describe. I translate it verse for verse, and imitate the measure and system of rhyme of the original, with this difference only, that the first, third, and fifth lines of each stanza rhyme with each other in the original, but not in my translation. With love my heart is troubled ; And mine eye-lid hind'reth sleep : My vitals are dissevered ; While with streaming tears I weep. My union seems far distant : Will my love ever meet mine eye ? Alas ! did not estrangement Draw my tears, I would not sigh. By dreary nights I'm wasted : Absence makes my hopes expire : My tears, like pearls, are dropping ; And my heart is wrapped in fire. INTRODUCTION. XVU Whose is like my condition ? Scarcely know I remedy, Alas ! did not estrangement Draw my tears, I would not sigh. O turtle-dove ! acquaint me Wherefore thus dost thou lament? Art thou so stung by absence ? Of thy wings deprived, and pent ? He saith, ' Our griefs are equal ; Worn away with love I lie.' Alas ! did not estrangement Draw my tears, I would not sigh. O First and sole Eternal ! Show Thy favour yet to me. Thy slave, Ahmad El-Bekree, Hath no Loed excepting Thee. By Ta-H4,'the Great Prophet, Do not Thou his wish deny. Alas ! did not estrangement Draw my tears, I would not sigh. I must translate a few more lines, to show more strongly the similarity of these songs to that of Solo- mon ; and lest it should be thought that I have varied the expressions, I shall not attempt to render them into verse. In the same collection of poems sung at Zikrs is one which begins with these lines : gazelle from among the gazelles of El- Yemen ! 1 am thy slave without cost : O thou small of age and fresh of skin ! thou who art scarce past the time of drinking milk ! In the first of these verses we have a comparison ex- actly agreeing with that in the concluding verse of Solomon's Song ; for the word which, in our Bible, is translated ' a roe,' is used in Arabic as synonymous with 'ghazal' (or a gazelle,) and the mountains of El- Yemen are the ' mountains of spices.' This poem ends with the following lines : The phantom of thy form visited me in my slumber : 1 said, ' O phantom of slumber ! who sent thee ?' He said, ' He sent me whom thou knowest j He whose love occupies thee.' XVIU INTRODUCTION. Attempted reply, from absence of sacred names ; The beloved of my heart visited me in the darkness of night ; I stood, to show him honour, until he sat down. I said, ' O thou my petition, and all my desire ! Hast thou come at midnight, and not feared the watchmen?' He said to me, ' I feared, but, however, love Had taken from me my soul and my breath.' Compare the above with the second and five following verses of the fifth chapter of Solomon's Song. Find- ing that songs of this description are extremely nu- merous, and almost the only poems sung at Zikrs; that they are composed for this purpose, and intended only to have a spiritual sense (though certainly not understood in such a sense by the generality of the vulgar ;) I cannot entertain any doubt as to the design of Solomon's Song. The specimens which I have just given of the religious love-songs of the Moslems have not been selected in preference to others as most agree- ing with that of Solomon, but as being in frequent use." To this may be added the statement of Major Scott Waring as to a kindred custom in Persia, " The Persians insist that we shall give them the merit of understanding their own language, that all the odes of their celebrated poets are mystical, and breathe a fer- vent spirit of adoration to the Supreme Being. They maintain that the Soofees profess eager desire with no carnal affection, and circulate the cup, but no material goblet, since all things are spiritual in their sect ; all is mystery within mystery." And finally, European literature contributes its quota of parallel in the Vita Nuova of Dante. A twofold reply, of but little cogency, has been attempted to this proof that there is no inherent un- likelihood in the mystical interpretation. It is alleged, firstly, that the Song of Solomon contains no hint, no key, no direct reference to holy names and ideas, such as is certainly found in the first quotation from Arabic sources given above, and such as may pos- sibly be found in the full text of the remainder, and that we are therefore not at liberty to interpret it otherwise than literally. This loses sight of a very important and familiar canon of composition, that an INTRODUCTION. XIX allegory, in order to be perfect, ought not to con- untenable tain its own key. So far as it does, or as any ob- g?ouniis.^^* trusive clue is given, it is defective in structure. The beast-fables of Bidpai, ^Esop, and Krilof, supply fa- miliar examples. Any distinct intimation of the pur- port in the body of the fable is simply destructive, and even an application tagged on is more than superfluous, ranking with the too audible stage-explanations in the tragedy of Pyramus and Thisbe. This charge against the Song of Solomon, then, merely proves its high literary excellence, and the skill with which the author avoided the defect into which the Arab poet has fallen. The only reason which would excuse deviation from this rule would be the imperative need of warning persons against being led astray by the literal sense ; but as a fact, in the whole literary history of the Canticles for nearly nineteen hundred years, there is scarcely an example on record of the literal sense having held its ground anywhere for a moment. Surely, if the mystical exposition be so unnatural and far-fetched as some declare, this would not and could not be so, as we may learn from the total failure of the Alexandrine critics to establish their allegorical interpretation of the Iliad. Another objection, that urged by an American objection literalist, Professor Noyes, is more philosophical in m?iTrity of tone, but not more convincing. It is that the funda- race and re- mental difi:erences between the pantheistic system of the frlm"dis" Sufis and the religion of the Jews, and the great in- ^^^^^ of terval of time which lies between Solomon and Hafiz, (even if it be conceded that the odes of the latter are religious poems at all) make it absolutely impossible to institute any parallel between them. This argu- ment loses sight of the original question, w^hich is not whether there is any close likeness between Sufism and Judaism, which might crop up in literary forms, but whether there is the least antecedent improbability in the human mind selecting amatory language to express devotional thoughts. The allegation that it is most unlikely to do so is disposed of by the parallels ad- duced, and the cogency of the argument woidd be un- . affected by the broadest divergency of race and creed, LTdisproof. XX INTRODUCTION. as all students of comparative mythology know fall well. But, not to dwell on the constant intercourse between Canaan and Persia, from the days when Abra- ham met Chedorlaomer till those when John of Per- sepolis came with Macarius of Jerusalem to the Council of Nicsea, which allowed ample opportunity for Iranian ideas to enter Palestine, the proof from the kindred race and religion of Arabia remains unmoved by any exception based on the plea of diversity, weak as even Anthropo- that is. Still less weight can be attached to objec- guage of the ^^^^^ drawn from the anthropomorphic language of the Song. Song, which has been declared inappropriate in the highest degree to such august themes as those which the traditional interpretation finds in it. Por this, again, is a mere a priori plea, and therefore of no logical force whatsoever, failing, besides, to take ac- count of the manner in which the shadow of the com- ing Incarnation is cast over the Old Testament, occa- sioning, nay, necessitating such language in order to prepare the minds of the Jewish nation for the recep- tion of the full Messianic idea of a God -Man, w^hich is gradually unfolded with advancing clearness as the prophetic series draws near its close. And as regards the question of the abstract fitness or unfitness of the language, it may be briefly observed that the " verify- ing faculty" of seventeen Christian centuries, exercised amongst others by men of such keen intellect, spiritual insight, and moral purity as Origen, Athanasius, Au- gustine, Gregory the Great, Alcuin, Bernard, Thomas Aquinas, and Gerson, may well be set against the con- flicting opinions of the last hundred years in a matter ■ of the kind. Maindiffi- This portion of the controversy leads up directly to; uterlii'sV^^ what is, after all, the main difficulty in the way of| view. literalists, a difficulty which they have not hitherto even plausibly seemed to overcome. It is that of ac- counting for the presence of the Song, assuming it to be a mere love-poem, in the Canon of Scripture at all, whether as originally admitted by the Jews or subse- quently adopted by the Christians. It would stand apart from all the rest of Scripture as alone without! INTRODUCTION. XXI a directly religious signification, and be necessarily isolation of degraded into a secondary rank, if not altogether ex- JJo^m the eluded from the list of inspired writings. The only rest of the semblance of answer to this plea is the allegation that ^^^^^' the Song does not stand alone in this respect, because the Book of Esther belongs to the same category, being alike without those sacred names and phrases which mark all other portions of the Bible. But this phantom argument vanishes at a touch. The Book of The Book of Esther does stand in a very clear and parauei'^°* * definite relation to all the other historical books, case, because it gives the details of a most important crisis in the national life of the Hebrew people, serving as the chief link between the Captivity and the restora- tion of Israel. And further, though holy words are carefully excluded from the book (possibly through reserve in a writing designed for circulation amongst Gentiles,) yet the fast proclaimed by Esther and Mor- decai points at once to a time of prayer to that Being Whose Name is left unspoken, and the Eeast of Purim, celebrated by Jews everywhere for the twenty -three centuries which have since elapsed, testifies to the national sense of a deliverance scarcely second to that of the Exodus. The Song, however, cannot be so con- nected with other parts of Scripture on a literalist theory, but must remain as a startling and inexplicable anomaly. ly. The sense that this is so has prompted, at solutions different eras, various tentative solutions of the diffi- proposed culty. The earliest of these was propounded by Theo- cUfflcuTty. dore of Mopsuestia in the first quarter of the fifth century, and represented the Song as merely an epi- thalamium on the marriage of Solomon with Pharaoh's daughter or with Abishag the Shunammite. This theory, after being condemned in express and forcible terms in the Eifth General Council, disappeared com- pletely for more than eight hundred years, when it was reproduced for a moment by Gregory Abulfaraj. It rested again till revived by Grotius, who allowed it, nevertheless, to include an allegory ; and it was finally developed into a very elaborate form by the celebrated XXll INTRODUCTION. Bossuet, in 1690, whose genius gave it a measure of popularity amongst scholars till the early part of the present century, when the ingenious criticisms of Dr. Mason Good (some of which had been anticipated long before by Natalis Alexander,) established the utter incongruity of the language of the Song with the cir- cumstances of a State alliance and with the national surroundings of an Egyptian princess, to whom the pastoral character of the Bride could in no wise be accommodated. The eloquent words in which Theodoret expresses the mind of the Church in his day against the views ascribed to Theodore of Mopsuestia merit citation. In the preface to his commentary on the Rejoinder of Cauticles, he says : " Since the majority of those who slander the Song of Songs and deny it to be a spiritual book, weave fables unworthy of crazy old women, some of them saying that Solomon the Wise wrote it con- cerning himself and Pharaoh's daughter ; a few authors of the same stamp alleging that Abishag the Shunam- mite is the Bride, and not Pharaoh's daughter ; while others, taking a somewhat more philosophical view, call it the Eoyal Speech, so as to understand the people by the Bride and the King by the Bridegroom ; we think that we shall be well employed in refuting at the outset of our exposition these false and mis- chievous theories, and then will proceed to set forth the true and clear meaning of the author. And yet these men ought to know that the holy Fathers, much their superiors in wisdom and spiritual insight, were they who placed this Book amongst the divine Scriptures, and approving it as full of the Spirit, pronounced it worthy of the Church. Por had they thought other- wise, they would never have included a work whose subject was passion and desire in the number of Holy Writ. . . . Not only Eusebius of Palestine, and Origen the Egyptian, and Cyprian of Carthage, crowned with the diadem of martyrdom, and men earlier than they were and nearer to the Apostles, but also those who were afterwards famous in the Churches, Basil the Great in his exposition of the beginning of Proverbs, and the two Gregories, allied to Basil, one by blood INTRODUCTION. XXIU and the other by friendship, and that valiant champion of religion Diodorus, and John, who to this day waters the whole earth with the streams of his teaching, and they who came still later, all pronounced this Book to be spiritual. Seeing that this is so, let us consider whether it be reasonable for us to follow our own theories, paying no attention to so many eminent men, and despising the Holy Spirit Himself, by not listen- ing to him who says so well : ' The thoughts of mortal men are miserable, and our devices are but uncertain,' (Wisd. ix. 14,) and blessed Paid saying of certain persons, ' They became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened,' (Eom. i. 21.) But let us cry thus with blessed Peter, ' We ought to obey God rather than man,' (Acts v. 29.) Let us also say to them, ' Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye : for we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard by the Holy Ghost.' . . . Coming then from the old to the new Bride, let us in this wise in- terpret the Song of Songs, and rejecting false and mis- chievous theories, let us follow the holy Fathers, and re- cognize one Bride conversing with one Bridegroom; and learn from the holy Apostles who that Bridegroom and Bride may be. Por the inspired Paul teaches us that, writing thus, ' I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ,' (2 Cor. xi. 2.) He calls her a Bride who is made up of many. Por he does not say, ' I have betrothed thee,' but you, that is, holy souls, perfected in virtue. Por Divine Scripture understands the Church by the Bride, and calls Christ the Bridegroom." It is needless to heap up testimonies of the same kind from other Patristic writers, since their own com- ments on the Song will speak for them in due time. But it is worth while to dwell for a moment on one point of the citation just given. It has been alleged by some modern critics that the dazzling powers of Origen gave the tone to the traditional interpretation origen not which has held its ground ever since his day, and that o^^the m°s he drew it from Talmudic sources, being the first to ticai view. XXIV INTRODUCTION. introduce it into tlie Churcli. Considering how em- bittered the opposition to Origen became even in his own life-time, this is not very probable in itself, but it is refuted by the contemporaneous language of S. Cyprian, who was not influenced by Origen's works, and also by Theodoret's incidental mention of an earlier and consentaneous tradition ascending much nearer to primitive times. Of this tradition but one written fragment has come down to us, a solitary note on Cant. iii. 9, by S. Theophilus of Antioch, who died between a.d. 178 and 189, a few years before Origen was bom. But the fragment is decisive as to the method followed in the second centuiy, and materially lessens the probability of Talmudic influence having affected a pre-existing literalism. Omitting the various phases through which the literalist theory has passed since its revival in the six- teenth century by Castellio (who went to the length of rejecting the Canticles altogether) it will suffice to state briefly the view now in fashion, but soon to be discredited by its own supporters on the ground of its glaring improbability and self-contradiction, pos- sessing, as it does, no shred of external evidence or internal plausibility. According to this hypothe- hypothesis, g|g^ invented by Jacobi in 1771, and accepted with further developments by the majority of subsequent literalists, the Song represents the adventures of a newly-wedded or betrothed Hebrew shepherdess, who is accidentally seen by Solomon in one of his pro- gresses, is vainly solicited and tempted by him, and even carried off as a prisoner to the royal harem, whence she finally escapes with her beloved shepherd back to the scenes of her former life. The witnesses called in defence of this theory, like the elders who testified against Susannah, are agreed in the main outline of their story, but are so irreconcilably at va- riance with one another on points of detail essential to consistency, as to be destructive of each other's credit. For if anything might be fairly expected to be most unmistakably prominent, were the theory true, it would be the distinction between the languaore of Modern Disagree- ment of its supporters. INTRODUCTION. XXV the genuine affection of the shepherd-husband, and that of the seductive wiles of the royal tempter. But Ginsburg and Renan, Meier and Hitzig, are utterly at variance on this head, and interchange the speeches in the most bewildering manner. Can any one suppose, were the stage directions in Shakespeare absent, that there could be the least doubt in assigning their several parts with accuracy to Othello and lago, to Postumus and lachimo ? Further, if the poem be intended, as The song has been suggested, as a satire upon Solomon, the "°* ^ ^^^t^"" difficulty is very much increased by the elaborate way mon"! ^°^°' in which the censure is concealed, so that the lapse of about two thousand eight hundred years has been necessary for its discovery. If a poet of the northern kingdom had written it with this intent, there is no conceivable reason why he should not have been more plain-spoken, because the fiercer his invective, the better would the kings of Ephraim have been pleased. And if he was a total stranger to the Aaronic wor- ship, the men of the Great' Synagogue, with whom Mosaic orthodoxy and loyalty to the House of Da- vid were first principles, would never have included his work in their Canon. If, on the other hand, a southern bard (and, by the hypothesis, an inspired one,) were the writer, there is at once a startling dis- similarity between the extreme caution employed ,°(wor- thy of a courtier epigrammatist under Doraitian or Louis XIV.,) and the bold denunciations of royal guilt such as we know to have been the wont of Hebrew prophets, a Nathan, an Elijah, a Micah, or a Jeremiah. As this commentary is not designed for critical, but for devotional purposes, it is beside its aim to go into the further disproof of this theory at length ; but two items of the moral argument against it may be given. Moral ar- one from the pen of a favourer of it, and the other from s^^^nt that of an opponent. - Wherever," observes Dr. Da- uteSm. vidson, " the doctrinal interest prevails, scientific ex- egesis declines in proportion, because it is overridden. The genuine spirit of interpretation is always favour- able to the literal sense. For the same reason Hofman and Delitzsch have recourse to the typical. Thouo-h XXVI INTRODUCTION. they do not recognise the validity of the allegorical method, they are too much led by doctrinal preposses- sions to embrace the literal, and are therefore fain to adopt a kindred mode of explanation." If for " doc- trinal interest" we substitute the equivalent terra " re- ligious belief," the meaning of this sentence will be unaltered, but a little clearer, and it is in fact an ad- mission that in exact proportion as men accept the tenets of Christianity, they will recede from " the letter that killeth" and draw near to *' the spirit that giveth life." The other remark is that of Hengsten- berg, who has said with biting truth : " The literal interpretation of this Book gained its honours in the age of Eationalism, when the Church was degraded to its lowest level, and when it was bare and void of sound ecclesiastical judgment, and of holy taste and tact." He might have gone further, had his position allowed it, and have pointed out that the Lutheran body, true to the animal and earthly instincts of its celebrated founder, has always been nearer the ground than any other large Christian community, and less capable of lofty spiritual views. The whole sect, in its three centuries of existence, though prolific in re- spectability, has not given birth to one man in whom the common consent of other men has recognized the marks of a saintly character, such as have not infre- quently illustrated the members of other Communions, nor has it produced any book (with the possible ex- ception of Gerhard's Meditations) which has been per- manently added to the list of those devotional works that have really enriched religious literature. In the field of the outer letter of Biblical study, in textual and grammatical criticism, in historical elucidation, it has laboured in a spirit of diligence and zeal beyond all praise, yet as the least erected spirit that fell From heaven ; for even in heaven his looks and thoughts Were always downward bent, admiring more The riches of heaven's pavement, trodden gold, Than aught divine or holy else, enjoyed In vision beatific. INTRODUCTION. XXVll Consequently, from being thus always engaged with the outer shell, the inner sense and the religious aroma have always escaped it. It has expended much care and science on Holy Writ, but its spiritual chemistry has invariably been of the kind which turns the most lustrous diamonds into black and worthless lumps of carbon, never of that higher constructive type which makes the light of jewels flash on our eyes from the dark places of the Bible. The necessity, after the gradual manufacture of the reigning literalist theory, for discovering some ground for the retention of the Canticles in the Canon, has led to the assertion that its design is to teach a higher The Song morality with regard to love and marriage than that Sse on^wed- prevalent amongst the Jews of the Solomonic age, and lock, in particular, to be a protest against polygamy and its attendant evils. There is a very sensible rule in Eng- lish law-courts to the effect that whatever may be the apparent grammatical meaning of an old statute, the only rule which can guide a judge is the interpretation put on its wording by his predecessors in their deci- sions. If it can be shown by a series of precedents, that the meaning contended for was never so much as urged, not to say recognized and allowed by the Courts, the plea breaks down at once. So it is in this case. There is not the faintest hint in any writer, Jewish or Christian, before the nineteenth century, that such a lesson is inculcated by the Song of Songs, there is no trace of any influence having been exerted by it in this direction. Conversely, the rule holds good that a series of de- cisions in agreement with one another, however little they may seem at first sight to outsiders to be logically deducible from the premises, are declaratory of the true force of a statute. Here, then, is a book which has exerted an exceedingly marked influence in Chris- tendom ever since a Christian literature arose ; which has materially affected the whole range of ascetic theo- logy ; which has powerfully contributed to the forma- tion of that religious ideal which moulded ten centuries of Christian history ; which continues to maintain its c2 XXVlll INTRODUCTION. hold upon many thousands of believers, directly or in- directly. For all practical purposes, and for all philo- sophic investigation into the spiritual records of the world, no method is of any value save the mystical one, for no other has ever passed into the stage of energy, or has contributed anything to the religious consciousness of mankind. If the truth of Jacobi's hypothesis could be set beyond a doubt by the dis- covery of coeval documents, there would be at best but the same kind of languid antiquarian interest aroused which greets each fresh alleged Biblical testi- mony found in cuneiform inscriptions, because the theory has always been utterly barren and dead ; and the graver problem would remain unsolved, how a literature so peculiarly limpid and emphatic in its utterance on moral and social questions should have suddenly changed its whole method, and have approached the question of marriage by a path so indirect, obscure, and enigmatic, as to be wholly inaccessible to all for whom the teach- ing was intended, and to owe its first survey to the chance guess of a stray traveller, eighteen centuries after another road had been opened, involving the total disuse of the older one. There have been many rival theories as to the road by which Hannibal's army crossed the Alps, but no one has yet conjectured that it came over the summit of Mont Blanc or the Matterhorn, much less that there was no other path for ordinary traffic till the Simplon was made practicable. And, it may be added, the upholders of this theory have shown by their own conduct how little they value the lesson they pro- fess to have found. The marriage law of Prussia, under which most of them live, is perhaps the very laxest and least moral in the civilized world ; only slightly, if at all, raised above the level of that of Imperial Eome in the days of Juvenal. Yet it does not appear to have elicited any protest based upon the Canticles, or, in- deed, upon anything else, from the critics. Form and Y. With regard to the form and imity of the Can- song.° ^ tides, there have also been conflicting theories, but the earliest Christian view has, curiously enough, been re- instated by modern critics in both these respects, for INTRODUCTION. XXIX they admit on the one hand that the poem is essentially one, and not a mere collection of odes loosely strung together, and on the other that its truest designation is that of a dramatic idyll. There is, however, the utmost disagreement amongst them as to the portions into which the Song is to be divided. Magnus, for example, makes twenty strophes of it ; De Wette and Heiligstedt twelve, though disagreeing as to the points of division; Hitzig finds nine, Weissbach six, and several others five. There is a similar, though much slighter, discrepancy between the pauses recognized by the mystical interpreters (for in truth these pauses are, with but one or two exceptions, very indistinctly marked,) but there is a very great difference between the result of these contradictions in the two cases. The mystics, acknowledging the Song to be a drama only in the modified sense of a dialogue carried on between three speakers, — the Bridegroom, the Bride, and the leader of their friends, — during a certain change of action, of entrances and exits, are little disturbed by any difficulty in adjustment of the divisions, because the sense is quite unaffected thereby. But the lite- ralists, who profess to see a regular plot evolved in accordance with the rules and the spirit of modern melodrama, are put out of court if they cannot agree amongst themselves as to the progress of the action, and few things in criticism are more instructive than the ela- borate stage-directions and lavish creation of additional dramatis personm to which Hitzig has been driven in order to harmonize the contradictions of their theory. The accepted Christian view, which acknowledges only ^^ ^^.^^ one masculine speaker in the Song, that Solomon who groom, King is depicted as at once Shepherd and King, finds con- herd^^^^" firmation from the juxtaposition of these two ideas in relation to the same person more than once in the Old Testament, as thus in Ezek. xxxiv. 23, " And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even My servant David ; he shall feed them, and be their Shepherd. And I the Loed will be their God, and My servant David a prince among them ; I the Lord have spoken it." Again, in Micah v. 2, 4, the XXX INTRODUCTION. " Killer in Israel" Who is to come out of Bethlehem, is to "feed in the strength of the Lord." Accord- ingly, it is natural enough to find Chuist claiming as His own the titles of Shepherd and King, and the Lamb of the Apocalypse crowned, and yet leading the redeemed to pastures and fountains, so that this por- tion of the imagery is as closely in accord with the teaching of the New Testament as that concerning the bridal relation was shown to be a little while back. The Bride of In the following Commentary the Bride is usually de- tiSe?" picted as the Church, whether Jewish or Gentile, or as threefold, the holy soul which is the microcosm of the Church. The Blessed Virgin, as the holiest of all elect souls, and as thus the most perfect type of the Church of God, is also given frequent prominence, in accordance with the teaching of the great mediaeval divines. But a certain weight must be allowed to the twofold objec- tion urged against absolute identification of her with the Bride throughout ; namely, that the Bridegroom stands to her in the relation of Son, not of Husband ; and further, that it is not till the twelfth century that any very large share is allotted her by the commentators. As a fact, Eupert of Deutz, and Honorius of Autun, who were the first to make her the leading figure in the Canticles, are frequently compelled to desert their path and return to the earlier track, and the four com- mentators, Denys a Eykel, Delrio, Ghislerius, and Cor- nelius a Lapide, who have professed to devote a section on each verse to her, are constantly obliged either to mere repetition of what they had already said concern- ing the holy soul, merely strengthening the epithets, or to pass over the paragraph with a few conventional phrases. Therefore, in the following pages no at- tempt has been made to pursue the formal tripartite division, and the Bride is presented under each aspect solely in proportion to what the text will reasonably bear, and to the really telling expositions of the Schoolmen. Catena of VI. It remains now only to speak briefly of the Authors. authors whose works have been employed in the com- pilation of this volume, and at the outset it should be observed that one very marked difference is noticeable INTRODUCTION. XXXI between the Commentaries on the Psalter and those on the Canticles. On the Psalter, possibly from its greater prominence in the Western Church, the Latin Fathers far surpass the Greek in beauty, depth, and fervour of exposition. In treating the Canticles, the case is re- Greek and versed. No Latin writer on this book, not even S. J^gntatorT" Bernard, approaches Origen ; S, Gregory the Great is inferior to Philo of Carpasia ; Aponius ranks below Theodoret ; Eupert beneath S. Gregory Nyssen. To counterbalance this advantage, the Canticles have suf- fered very heavy losses, positive and negative. Nega- tively, they have never been treated by some of those whose genius was most adapted to such a task. Nei- ther S. Albert the Great nor S. Bonaventura, for ex- ample, have included it in their labours. Positively, the losses have been much more serious. Of the great commentary of Origen but a few scanty fragments re- main, breaking off before the close of the second chapter. S. Gregory Nyssen's work remains imperfect too, and Michael Psellus, who paraphrases him, is compelled to break off in consequence. Death seized S. Bernard while he was engaged in the composition of his won- derful sermons on the Song of Songs, when he was but a fourth of the way through his task, and the like des- tiny took away his continuator, Gilbert of Hoyland, before he had completed the fifth chapter. Some of the ancient commentators, as Eusebius and Polychro- nius, are reduced to the merest fragments; others have perished all but the name. Yet, after all such deductions, the quantity of material existing down to the close of the sixteenth century is very great, of con- siderable interest and value, and singularly homo- geneous, apart from the open borrowing or recasting usual in commentaries of successive generations. Since that time the number of writings on the book has vastly increased in number, but not by any means in spiritual value, and the list subjoined, therefore, makes no pretence to be an exhaustive catalogue, but merely indicates the volumes which have actually been laid under contribution, or examined with that end, even if unsuccessfully. XXXU INTRODUCTION. 1. First in order, though perhaps not in actual date of present condition, comes the Targum on Canticles, valuable as exhibiting the current of Jewish tradition, and often illustrating remarkably the views of Chris- tian theology. I cite it usually from Walton's Polyglot. 2. Origen, (+ 253) whose splendid genius and profound devotional instinct shone so conspicuously in his Biblical writings, left a commentary of great length on the Canticles, of which S. Jerome, a most competent judge, observed that Avhereas he had sur- passed every one else in his other commentaries, he had surpassed himself in this. Only a few brief pas- sages remain, carrying on the exposition to Cant. ii. 15. 3. Still more unfortunate has been Eusebius of Csesarea (+ 340,) of whose commentary only the merest fragments exist, which w^ere published by Meur- sius at Lyons in 1617. 4. S. Gregory Nyssen (-f- 370) has left a commen- tary carried on as far as Cant. vi. 9. Its distinguishing peculiarity is that he represents the Bride throughout as the soul of man, and pays but little attention to the more usual theory. His defects of obscurity and invo- lution are by no means absent from the work. 5 . A Catena, known as that of the Three Fathers, SS. Nilus, Maximus, and Gregory Nyssen, drawn up at an early period, is of considerable value, and is one of the chief authorities for the tropological interpretation. 6. S. Epiphanius, the famous Bishop of Constantia (+ 403,) wrote a commentary on the Canticles, long sup- posed to be utterly lost, and not therefore cited by any of the chief compilers. It was translated, however, into Latin by his namesake Epiphanius the Scholastic, about a century after his death, and after lying neglected in manuscript for twelve hundred years, was at last pub- lished at Eome by Eoggini in 1750. It is very terse, and not of much importance, because, for the one part, it follows Origen pretty closely ; and for the other, it is followed in turn and happily expanded by the sub- ject of the next notice. The Abbe Migne's edition, though professing to give all the works, genuine and spurious, of each Epiphanius, omits this commentary. INTRODUCTION. XXXIU 7. Philo, Bishop of Carpasia in Cyprus (+ 374,) the pupil and friend of S. Epiphanius, to whom he owed his see, has left one of the most valuable of the early commentaries on the Song of Songs. It is of considerable length, and contains many passages of great beauty, probably enshrining for us much of the teaching of Origen, and undoubtedly much of that of S. Epiphanius. It is noteworthy for another reason also, that S. Gregory the Great borrowed freely from it in his commentary, a circumstance which has led Cornelius a Lapide to allege that Philo must have been largely interpolated, rather than admit that the great Western Doctor could stoop to draw materials from the East. 8. S.Ambrose (+ 397) though not formally a com- mentator on Canticles, has, in fact, gone over nearly the whole ground in one or other of his books, and often with great beauty of illustration. A certain Abbat Guilielmus of S. Thierry at Eheims (+ circ. 1160) was at the pains to collect these scattered notices into a single volume. 9. Polychronius (+ 427,) Bishop of Apamea, has Fifth left a few fragments on the Song, in full agreement ^®"*'*'7' with the traditional interpretation, and noteworthy on that account, because he was brother of its first im- pugner, Theodore of Mopsuestia. They were pub- lished, along with those of Eusebius, by Meursius. 10. Theodoret, Bishop of Cyrus (+ 430,) is one of the most important and able of the early expositors, and the calm judgment of his language adds much weight to his opinion. 11. S. Justus of Urgel (+ 540,) is the earliest ex- sixth tant Latin commentator, and, while following in the ^^^*^*^^- track of his Eastern predecessors, often adds a pithy remark of his own, which exhibits the germ of that kind of mystical exposition wliich culminated in the twelfth century. 12. Next follows the commentary ascribed to Cas- siodorus (+ 562,) though its authorship is disputed. The truth seems to be that it is his, though interpo- lated to some extent. Whoever the author may be, Century. XXXIV INTRODUCTION. the work is marked with great good sense and un- questionable piety. Century. ^^- S. Gregory the Great (+ 604,) has not sus- tained his usual level in his Commentary on the Can- ticles. That there are devout and beautiful passages in it, besides those drawn from Philo, is unquestionable, but it does not reach the standard of his Morals on the Book of Job. 14. S. Isidore of Seville (+ 636,) has compiled a very brief gloss on the Canticles, containing no fresh matter, and it may accordingly be passed over by students. 15. Aponius, an author of somewhat uncertain date, but probably about 680, wrote one of the very best of the early Latin comments. It is unfortunately imper- fect, but an epitome of the missing portion, by Lucas, Abbat of Mount S. Cornelius, is extant, and in a great degree supplies the loss. riS.S.v i^- The Venerable Bede (+ 735) follows Cassio- dorus almost invariably, but often expands his thought and adds some fresh touches which give additional vigour and fervency. 17. Alcuin of York (+ 750,) like S. Isidore of Seville, brings nothing new to the exposition of the Song, and may be safely omitted. 18. Angelomus of Luxeuil (-}- 850,) compiled at the desire of the Emperor Hlothar I. a commentary in which he mainly follows Aponius and S. Gregory the Great, but not infrequently adds a few touches of his own, which have their value. 19. Haymo, Bishop of Halberstadt (+ 853,) a con- temporary of Angelomus, has also compiled a terse gloss drawn from his predecessors, and selected with much judgment. It contains, however, very little original matter. 20. To the same period, about the middle of the ninth century, belongs the Ordinary Gloss, first drawn up by Strabo of Fulda, and gradually augmented. It will be found cited a few times in the following com- mentary. 21. The tenth century is an entire blank, so far as Ninth Century INTRODUCTION. XXXV expositions of the Canticles ,q:o, and the first book of the kind which meets us in the eleventh century is a Eleventh mere epitome of S. Gregory the Great bv S. Radulphiis ^" ^'^^' of Fontenelle, first Abbat of S. Vandrille (+ 1047.) His learned Augustinian editor, Homraey, retorts the charge which Cornelius a Lapide brings against Philo, for he claims for him the original autliorship as against S. Gregory, but on very insufficient grounds. 22. Michael Psellus, a Greek physician and senator, (+ 1105,) wrote, about 10.50, a metrical paraphrase of the Canticles in accentual iambic verse, based on the commentary of S. Gregory Nyssen, but occasionally introducing new matter of his own. 23. S. Anselm of Laon, the " Scholastic Doctor," Jwem (+ 1103,) is supposed to be the true author of a com- "^ ^^' mentary of much interest which was originally printed under the name of his more eminent namesake and contemporary, S. Anselm of Canterbury. It has also been attributed to Herve of Dol, and will be found often cited in the succeeding pages. 24. Marbod of Eennes, who died at a very great age in 1123, has left, like Psellus, a metrical para- phrase of the Song, executed in hexameters. Its close- ness to the Yulgate text, however, and tolerable neat- ness of execution, are its chief merits, for it does not add anything to the exegesis. 25. S. Bruno of Aste, (+ circ. 1120,) is the author of a compilation on the Canticles, which contains scarcely a trace of new matter, and may therefore be passed over. 26. The wonderful sermons on the Canticles by S. Bernard, (+ 1130,) all too few, though eighty-six in number, do not quite complete the exposition of the first and second chapters. Their eloquence and fer- vour are far more conspicuous than the actual amount of direct illustration wdiich they yield, though it is by no means scanty, and they not merely deserve, but compel perusal. 27. Honorius of Autun, the author of the famous Gemma AnimcB, (+ circ. 1130,) has left two indepen- dent commentaries, one of them entitled Sigillum B. XXXVl INTRODUCTION. Mari(S, both of them coutaiiiing many beautiful, though fanciful passages. 28. Richard of S. Victor, (+ 1130,) has commented on portions only of the Canticles, and is not quite con- tinuous in his work. What he has done is, however worthy of his great reputation as a mystical divine, and he will be found often cited. 29. Eupert, Abbat of Deutz, (+1135,) one of the very greatest of mediaeval commentators on Scripture, has produced a gloss of considerable length, whose main feature is the presentment of the Blessed Virgin as the Bride, a rule only occasionally departed from throughout his work, and that under great stress. 30. The same holds of the Gloss by Philip Harveng, Abbat of Bona Spes, in Hainault, (+1150,) a cele- brated mystic, but it is far inferior to that of Rupert in beauty and value, and will be rarely found refen-ed to. 3l! The sermons of Gilbert of Hoyland, (+ 1175,) on the Canticles, written in avowed continuation of S. Bernard, and approaching more nearly than any others to the beauty and fervour of his style, are well deserv- ing of study, and have supplied many paragraphs to this book. 32. Irirabert, Abbat of Ambden, and previously of S. Michael at Bamberg, (+ 1177,) commented at some length on detached portions of the Canticles, and sometimes happily enough. His work was first pub- lished by the learned Bernard Pez in his Thesaurus Anecdotorum. Thirteenth 33. AlanusdeInsulis,theUniversal Doctor,(+1203,) Century. -^^^ followed in the steps of Rupert, but not without leaving traces of his own marked individuality on his work. 34. William Little, of Newbury, or Guilielmus Par- vus, (+1208,) the author of a well-known and sensible Histoiy of England, also wrote a commentary on the Canticles, now lost, but which Delrio, who saw it in MS. at Louvain about 1600, has largely cited. All quo- tations from this source are therefore at second-hand. 35. Thomas, Canon of S. Victor, and first Abbat of S. Andrew's at Verceil, (+ 1226,) wrote a mystical INTRODUCTION. XXXVll comment on the Canticles, based on the Hierarchies of the Pseudo-Dionysiiis, for the most part difficult of comprehension by the uninitiated reader, but with oc- casional passages which are really suggestive and clear. It was published by Pez in the same volume as Irimbert. 36. John Hailgrin, Archbishop of Besancon, and Cardinal of S. Sabina, (+ 1237,) is author of a Gloss belonging to the same school as those of Kupert and Alan of Lille, but not, on the whole, of remarkable merit. 37. A more famous Cardinal, occupying the same title of S. Sabina, Hugo of S. Cher,' (+ 1250,) is next to follow. His great work on the whole Bible includes the Canticles, and though mainly aiming at condensing and systematizing the patristic comments, often adds much of value to the older matter. 38. A Catena, passing under the famous name of S. Thomas Aquinas, (+ 1274,) but of more than doubtful authenticity, succeeds in order. It adds so very little to what had been done four centuries earlier by Hay mo of Halberstadt, that it may be altogether pretermitted. 39. Nicolas de Lyra, a converted Jew, of Norman Fourteenth birth, and afterwards an ornament of the Franciscan Century. Order, (+ 1340,) is the author of valuable Postils on the Bible, in which his knowledge of Hebrew is made to bear on the exegesis. The distinguishing pecu- liarity of his useful treatise on the Canticles is the re- newed prominence into which he brings the forgotten thought of the spiritual identity between the Jewish and Christian Churches, thus striking at the root of that alleged severance of the Song from all relations to the Old Testament which has been charged by modern literalists against the mystical exposition. 40. The Emperor Matthew Cantacuzene, (+ circ. 1360,) who, after a year's partnership of the Byzantine throne with his father John V., retired to a monastery on Mount Athos, wrote in his monastic state a commen- tary containing many beautiful passages, and noticeable as the only Greek one which depicts the Blessed Virgin as the Bride. XXXVIU INTRODUCTION. 41. John Gerson, the "Most Christian Doctor," (+ 1429,) has directly treated the Song in his 8ym- psalma in Cantlcum, and indirectly in his more cele- brated Treatise on the Magnificat. But his writings, though full of piety and fervour, contribute scarcely anything to the exposition. 42. Tar different is the case with the beautiful com- ment of the Ecstatic Doctor, Dionysius Leewis a Ey- kel, better known as Dionysius the Carthusian (+1450.) He is the first to divide each chapter under three formal heads, according as he treats of the Church, or Sponsa Universalis, of the holy soul, or Sponsa particu- larism or of the Blessed Virgin, or Sponsa singidaris, a method which found several followers at a later time. I am not sure that this work does not rank above even his lovely exposition of the Psalms. 43. Contemporary with this is the work of Nicolas Kempf of Strasburg, Prior of the Carthusians at Gaming in Austria, and known as Nicolaus de Argen- tina, (+ 1450,) published by Pez, in the two closing volumes of the Bihliotheca Ascetica. Though mainly drawn from SS. Gregory the Great and Bernard, it is full of beautiful passages due to the compiler himself, and will amply repay examination. 44. The celebrated mystic, Henry Harphius, (+ 1478,) has left a treatise on the spiritual life, entitled Theologia Mystica, consisting of long expositions or meditations on detached verses of the Song, perfectly crowded with beauties, though not always available for separate cita- tion. No edition after 1580 is trustworthy, as the book was tampered with by its later editors. 45. Jacob Parez de Valentia, Bishop of Christopolis, (+ 1507,) has treated tlie Canticles in a gloss which, though of little originality or power, contains not a few suggestive passages. 46. Francis Titelmann, a Franciscan, (+ circ. 1547,) a man of great learning and no mean critical skill, has written usefully on the Song, though not contributing much to the mystical exposition. 47. S. Thomas of Yillanova, Archbishop of Valencia, (+ 1555,) was cut off by death after having merely INTRODUCTION. XXXIX outlined his intended Commentary on the Song, and when but three chapters had been sketched. The pa- tristic spirit shines, however, in the fragment, and causes regret at the incompleteness of the undertaking. 48. Martin Delrio, a learned Jesuit, (+ 1608,) is the Seventeenth first on the list of those commentators of the seven- ^®^*'^^* teenth century who began a twofold treatment of the books they discussed, first giving a literal and textual comment, and then a catena of earlier expositions. His own original matter is not striking, but he has collected much valuable material together. 49. Michael Ghislerius, a Clerk Eegular, (+ circ. 1615,) is the most ponderous of writers on the Can- ticles, lie has bequeathed to us an enormous folio of nearly a thousand pages in double columns and small type, wherein he discusses every verse in five difi'erent ways; textually, taking the Church, the holy soul, and the Blessed Virgin, severally as the Bride, and clos- ing with a long catena of ancient expositors, which is by far the most valuable part of his work, though even it is by no means exhaustive. 50. Henry Ainsworth, an English Independent (-|- 1622,) is deserving of consultation, for the Eab- binical learning and the apt parallelisms from other books of Scripture w^hich he has brought to bear upon the Song. 51. Luis de la Puente, or De Ponte, (+ 1624,) composed a huge volume of Sermons on the Canticles, intended for the use of Keligious, but heavy and life- less in treatment, and quite below his reputation. 53. It is unnecessary to do more than name the well-known commentary of Cornelius a Lapide (+1637) since its character is sufficiently well known to make criticism superfluous. 53. John Cocceius, a German Protestant theologian of enormous learning and diligence, and of great piety, (+ 1669,) of whom it was said, that " Grotius sees Christ nowhere, but Cocceius sees Him everywhere," recalls the spirit of the best mediaevalists by his remark- able gift of mystical appreciation. His Commentary on the Canticles is injured by its exclusive reference to xl . INTRODUCTION. the literal history of the Christian Church, and by oc- casional outbreaks of controversy, but it may be con- sulted with much profit. With this author closes the period formally embraced in the following commentary, which does not profess to deal with the exeg-esis of the eighteenth and nine- teenth centuries, properly beginning with Bossuet's commentary in 1690. But as textual criticism often throws new and valuable light on mystical interpreta- tion, later writers have been freely consulted, and it will suffice to enumerate, amongst others, Harmer, Percy, Mason Good, Eosenmiiller, Heiligstedt, Hitzig, Hengstenberg, Weissbach, and Thrupp. It would have been easy to have extended the catalogue largely, but at the sacrifice of unity of plan; and besides, the omitted authors are for the most part readily accessible and familiarly known, whereas the majority of those quoted in the succeeding pages have been hitherto practically confined to a very narrow circle of readers. A COMMENTARY THE SONG OF SONGS. CHAPTEU I. 1 The song of songs^ whicli is Solomon^s. Song of songs. "As we have been tauglit by Moses origen. that there are not only holy places, but a Holy of holies, that there are not only other Sabbaths, but Sab- baths of sabbaths ; so now we are taught, by the pen of Solomon, that there are not only songs, but a Song of songs. Blessed, truly, is he who enters into the holy place, but more blessed he who enters the Holy of holies. Blessed is he who keepeth the Sabbath, but more blessed who keepeth the Sabbath of sabbaths. So, too, blessed is he who understands songs, and sings them, for no one does sing save on high festivals, but much more blessed is he who sings the Song of songs. And as he, who enters into the holy place, still needs much ere he is able to proceed into the Holy of holies, and as he who keeps the sabbath enjoined on the people by the Loed, wants many things that he may keep the Sabbath of sabbaths, so too he who traverses all the 1 songs of Holy Writ, finds it no easy thing to ascend to ithe Song of songs. Thou must needs go out of Egypt, ] and, issued thence, cross the Red Sea, that thou mayest ising the first song, saying, ' I will sing unto the Loed, ExocI. xv. i. efor He hath triumphed gloriously.' And even though ' thou mayest have sung this first song, thou art still far from the Song of songs. Pass spiritually through A COMMENTARY ON [1.1. Numb. xxi. 17. Deut. xxxii. 1. Judg. V. 1. 2 Sam. xxii. 2. Isa. V. 1. Targum. Isa. XXX. 29 Aponius. Ricard. Vic- torin. Rupert. Theodoret. Eph. V. 19. Nicol. Argent. Honor. Aug. S. Greg. Magn. S. Bernard. the wilderness, till thou comest to the well, which the princes dug, that thou mayest there sing the second song. Afterwards approach the borders of the Holy- Land, and, standing on Jordan's banks, sing the song of Moses, ' Give ear, O ye heavens, and I will speak ; and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.' Yet again, thou needest soldiers, and the inheritance of the Holy Land, and that a bee should prophesy to thee and judge thee — for Deborah is, by interpretation, a bee — that thou mayest utter that hymn also, which is contained in the Book of Judges. Ascending to the record of the Kings, come to the song when David escaped from the hands of all his enemies, and from the hand of Saul, and said, ' The Lord is my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer.' Thence thou must reach Isaiah, that thou mayest say with him, ' I will sing to my Beloved a song of my Beloved touching His vineyard.' And when thou hast traversed all these, go up yet higher, that thou mayest with pure soul cry unto the Bridegroom this song of songs." TheTargum counts up ten songs, adding to Origen's list those of Adam, sung alter his fall and pardon ; Joshua's at Ajalon ; and a tenth, never yet uttered, to be sung by the people of God at the end of their long captivity, to which applies that prophecy, " Ye shall have a song, as in the night when a holy solemnity is kept." This one, however, is the 8o7ig of songs, because as Christ our Lord, as Man, surpassing all Apostles, Patriarchs, Prophets, and hea- venly powers, is King of kings, and Lord of lords, so this song, since entirely concerning Him and His Bride, excels, and includes in itself, all the hymns of victory, of thanksgiving, of instruction, and of lamen- tation in Holy Writ, just as the bridal feast surpasses all others, and since no blessing which other songs commemorate can be compared with the Incarnation. And as the Apostle tells his hearers to speak to them- selves " in psalms, and hymns, and spiritual songs," we understand that psalms, accompanied by an instru- ment, denote the active life of charity, and hymns the contemplative life, and songs, embracing these two, are the life of the righteous, who give soul and body to God ; while the Song of songs, that holy secret which only God's unction can teach, only spiritual experience can make clear, is the life of the perfect. The Song is Solomon's, the third in order of his books, following Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, to teach us that after the I. 2.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 3 have passed the purgative way, by following the moral precepts of the first of these ; and the illuminative M^ay, s. Grep. m. by learning in the second that all earthly things are vanity, and God alone to be desired ; we attain in the third place to the unitive way, and by it make our en- Origen. trance into the Holy of holies, where the High Priest, our Bridegroom, stands, that we may there learn and Nic. Argent, sing the song of perfect love, — there only, for " how Ps. cxxxvii. shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land ?" It ^• is Solomon s, for Solomon means Peaceful, and Cheist, ?,.• ^'*®^- to Whom it in truth appertains, is " our Peace," having ^^ 'jj j^ been " made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and c • q sanctification, and redemption." 2 Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth : for thy love is better than wine. First, say the Fathers in general, it is the cry of the omn. Patr. Synagogue, God's ancient Church, yearning for the Incarnation of Christ, and desiring that God would no more speak to her only by the voices of angels and Erophets, but face to face. I care not, she says, to s. Bernard, ear Moses, who is slow of speech to me, the lips of Isaiah are unclean, Jeremiah cannot speak, for he is a child, and all the Prophets are tongueless. Let Him of Whom they speak, Himself speak, let Him kiss me Dion, earth. tvith the kisses of Sis mouth. And His answer is set down for us by the Apostle : " God, Who at sundry Heb. i, i. times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by His Son." She asks for His kiss, because as two separate bodies unite in the act of kiss- ing, so Christ, by His becoming flesh, united God and The Gloss, man together, two natures in One Person. And as a kiss denotes peace and reconciliation, it is the fit greeting of Him, our peaceful Solomon, Who came to s. Justus us as God and Saviour. It is also the cry of the o^gei. Gentile world, yearning for the teaching of the Holy u „ Spirit, for as the breath of one that kisses is felt by ^"' ^^ ^" the one that is kissed, so by the kiss of Christ, we s. Ambros. understand the inspiration of the Holy Ghost Whom He hath sent. Next, the words belong to every faith- s. Greg. m. ful soul which desires the presence of its Lord. See, ^- Bernard, exclaims a Saint, how sudden is the opening of her cant.^"' ^'^ address. Asking a great thing from a mighty Person, she uses no customary flattery, she takes no indirect B 2 4 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 2. way to that whicli she longs for. She makes no pre- face, she seeks not to conciliate good- will, but breaking out from the abundance of her heart, says, in plainest and boldest words, Let Sim hiss me ivitli the kisses of serm, viiL ' Sis mouth. His mouth. Yes, but it is not every one who dares ask this, but only such as have already re- ceived the pledge of love, and desire it again. For us sinners it is fitter to fall down trembling at the feet of our righteous Loed, like the publican, not daring to look up, but like the sinful woman, content to kiss His feet, and to bathe them with our tears. Then, when s. John V. -^^ hath said, " Thou art made whole, sin no more, lest 14. a worse thing happen to thee," we may dare to rise a little, and kiss the Hand which has cleansed and lifted us, giving Him the homage and glory which are His due. At last, after many tears and prayers, we may, in fear and trembling, lift our heads to His glorious mouth, not merely to gaze upon it, but to kiss it. To Thee, O Loed Jesu, to Thee has my heart fitly said, Thy Face, Loed, will I seek. For Thou madest me to hear of Thy mercy betimes in the morning, when, as I lay in the dust, kissing Thy sacred footsteps. Thou forgavest me the sins of my life. Then, as the day grew on. Thou madest glad the soul of Thy ser- vant, bestowing on me the grace of holy living in the kiss of Thy Hand. And now what remains, O gracious Loed, save that in the fulness of light, in the fervour of the Spirit, Thou, mercifully admitting me to the kiss of Thy mouth also, wouldst fill me with joy with Thy countenance ? Note, too, how it is said Let Him Hugo Card. ^^-^^ ^^^ with no name particularized, no context to ex- plain who is meant. And that because to the Bride there can be but One to think of, because her word ever is, " Whom have I in heaven but Thee ? and there Ps. ixxiii.24. is none on earth I desire in comparison of Thee." She asks, too, not for a single kiss, but for hisses, for those seven great gifts of the Spieit which Cheist bestows, De Ponte. ^^^ f^r other graces besides. And He gives them in four ways, by His Incarnation, by His conversation amongst men as their Teacher, by mystical incorpora- i tion with us for our redemption, and by the final glory Parez, which He promises. Peace with God in Cheist, is then the scope of the Bride's longings, as she prays for s. Greg. illumination, for love, for perfect union with Him of Nyss. Whom she says, " Full of grace are Thy lips, wherefore Ps. xiv. 3. God hath blessed Thee for ever." His lips, which give I. 2.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 5 the kiss, are His truth and sweetness, hers, which re- Henr. ceive it, are her understanding and aflfection. And He Harph. has heard the cry of His Bride, and answered it, giving her more than she asked, giving her Himself again and again in the Holy Sacrament of the Altar. " The pseudo- soul," observes an ancient writer, " sees herself cleansed Ambros. from all her sins, and fitted to approach the Altar of '^^ ^^^^' ^' Cheist. She sees the wondrous Sacrament and saith, Let Sim kiss me toith the kisses of Sis mouth, let Christ Himself impress His kiss on me." And Simeon Metaphrastes, in that hymn which the Eastern Church puts in the mouth of her children before Communion, speaks of the kiss which the penitent soul offers in turn to her LoED in that sacred rite : More than the harlot I have erred, who, learning Thine abode, tdvoin^. Made purchase of the precious nard, and boldly took her road To seek and to anoint Thy feet, Christ, my" God and Lord, And, as she came with love to greet, was not by Thee abhorred. So, Word of God, calm Thou my fears, and give me, not de- Thyfeet to clasp, and kiss, and wash with tears, that nard un- priced. The soul may kiss her Loed also by acts of love and ^ic. Argent, compassion towards His poor, and will be rewarded by Him therefor with that last kiss which He will give at the Doom, saying, " Come, ye blessed." But they who have not so kissed Him here, shall see His face no more, for He will turn His back upon them. And that which is true of the Church, and true of every believ- ing soul, is especially true of her who is the Church's fairest ornament, the purest and fhost blessed of Saints, the Virgin Mother of God. The words are her prayer ^yy^^^^ to God the Fathee, that by the breath of His mouth, which is the Holy Ghost, He may give her that in- effable kiss. His Only-begotten Son. When the Angel brought her the marvellous tidings of her true be- trothal, then by her answer, " Behold the handmaid of s. Luke i. the Loed, be it unto me according to thy word," she ^^' did in truth say, Let Sim kiss me with the kisses of Sis mouth. And after His nativity, the prayer was yet more literally answered, when the tender Mother ^°"^- ^ ^^p- hung over her infant Loed, and clasped Him to her breast. And His love so endured that even at the last moment of life He bent to offer His kiss. " He bowed xauier, de His head to His Mother," says a holy writer, " and to Pass. Dom. all mankind, as though bidding His last farewell, and 6 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 2. offering the kiss of peace. See here, O faithful soul, the unspeakable lore of tby God, that He loved us unto the end." And we learn hereby the pain as well as the sweetness of His kiss. Keble, Lyra Three Saints of old their lips upon the Incarnate Saviour Innocent. laid ; And each with death or agon}^ for the high rapture paid. His Mother's holy kisses of the coming sword gave sign, And Simeon's hymn full closely did with his last breath en- twine. And Magdalen's first tearful touch prepared her but to greet "With homage of a broken heart His pierced and lifeless feet. Theodoret. -^^^^ ^^V ^^^'^ ^* better than tvine. The change from s. Greg. M. the third person to the second, from speaking of the Bridegroom to speaking to Him, denotes, some Fathers say, His swift appearing in fulfilment of His Bride's desire, coming even before He is actually called ; show- ing how more than ready God ever is to answer our isa. ixv. 24. P^^y^^' according to that saying of the Prophet, " Be- fore they call, I will answer : and while they are yet . speaking, I will hear." The LXX. and Vulgate have ngen. ^y^_^ breasts. And some tell us that the gentle teach- Nyss"!^^ ing of Christ, drawn from the secret treasures of His Haymo. wisdom and knowledge, is meant thereby, milk fitted for babes, better than the wine of human wisdom or PhUo Carp, ^'^^n of the old Law. Philo of Carpasia and several Cassiodorus. others see in the breasts the two Testaments, both Beda. given by Christ, whence the sincere milk of the Word, s. Just. Org. refreshing, and not hurtful like wine, is granted to s. Greg. M. mankind. And a kindred explanation is found in those s. Greg. writers who will have' the Apostles and Doctors of the ^>ss. Church to be meant here. The ancient exposition of s. Niius. ^]^g Three Fathers interprets the words of the hidden s.Maximus. ^^^^^ ^^ ^^^ -g-^j^ Eucharist, with which agrees well Mat^'ss" *^^* passage of S. Chrysostom : " See ye not with what eagerness infants seize the breast, with what pressure they fix their lips upon the teats ? Let us approach with no less desire to this Table, and to the spiritual breast of this Chalice, nay, with yet greater longing, let us, as sucking children, drink in the grace of the Spirit ; let it be our one sorrow, our one grief, if we be stinted of this spiritual food." Some of the inter- pretations, however, bring us back to the true mean- ing of the literal Hebrew, Thy loves. Thus S. Bernard arm. IX. \y{^^ ^jg ^qq here the long-suffering of Christ in bear- ing with sinners, and His loving-kindness in receiving ; I. 2.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 7 tbem wlien they return to Him. S. Gregory speaks of s. Greg. m. tbe love of God and of our neighbour as supplying that stream of charity which is the necessary food of the soul. And we may take it also of that sweetness of Cheist, which is the Holt Spirit Himself, given in twofold manner, for the remission of sin and for the increase of grace. However it be explained, we come R"pert. back to the one thought of union with Him Whose loving kiss is beyond all earthly blessedness. Ne/cTcp e7}u ih (piArjua' rh yap arS/na ueKrapos ^iruei, Anthol, Hvp fxeOvco rh (piKriixa, ttoXvv rhy epcora ireTruKdos. Graecv. 305, Nectar to me was the kiss, for the mouth was breathing of nectar, Now am I drunk with the kiss, having quaffed off love in abun- dance. They inquire at much length, too, (unnecessarily so far as the Hebrew is concerned,) why the Bridegroom's breasts are commended, while we should expect such praise to be given only to the Bride. And the happiest answers are, first, that Cheist, Himself the source of all true and pure love, unites in His own Person a Corn, a Lap. mother's affection for us with a father's, whence the Book of Sirach, speaking of the Eternal Wisdom, says, " I am the mother of fair love ;" and secondly, that as eccIus. mothers feed their babes from their own bodies, so ^'^•^'- ^^• Cheist feeds His children, and poured forth, like the fabled pelican, His very Blood for our refreshment as ^ r^u He hung upon the Cross. Chrysost. Et nunquam sine lacte charitas, Lac nou uberat, uberat cruorem. And never without milk is charity, It is not milk it yields for us, but blood. The Bride sums up the fruits of that kiss in a four- fold manner. She has obtained from it the sweetness of milk, the warmth of wine, the fragrance of odour, and the gladness of unction. She is refreshed by the first, which is light to her understanding ; she is inflamed by the second, which is heat to her affection ; she is s Thomas excited to appetite by the third, which is the foretaste aViUanova. of glory to her longing ; she is consecrated by the last, which is joy of spirit in the Passion. 3 Because of the savour of thy good oint- 8 A COMMENTARY ON [1.3. ments thy name is as ointment poured forth, therefore do the virgins love thee. Tile first clause here does not exactly represent the existing Hebrew text, nor yet any of the chief versions. The true rendering is, Pleasant for odour are Thine ointments. The LXX. reads, Tlie perfume of Thine ointments is above all spices. And the Vulgate, con- necting the words with the previous verse, has \_Thy breasts are'] fragrant with the best ointments. The Origen. Bride, observes Origen, had already some acquaint- ance with spices, to wit, the words of the Law and the Prophets, wherewith, before the Bridegroom's coming, she was partially instructed and trained for the service of God, as still in her early youth, and under tutors Gal. iii.24. and governors, for " the Law was our schoolmaster, to bring us unto Christ." All these were spices, where- with she seems to have been nourished and made ready for her Bridegroom. But when the fulness of time was come, and she came of age, and when the Father sent His Only-begotten into the world, anointed by the Holy Ghost, the Bride, smelling the fragrance of the divine unction, and perceiving that all those spices which she had been hitherto using were far inferior compared with the sweetness of this new and heavenly ointment, saith. The perfume of Thine ointments is above all spices. Of this anointing the. costly unguent wherewith Aaron was consecrated is but an earthly type, as inferior as the earthly High Priest is to the heavenly one, yet having a mystical reference to it. And note, tbat the Bride speaks of ointments, in the plural, as confessing the many gifts and graces which come from Christ as their one source. And thus is said in another place touching this same unction : " Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity, wherefore, O God, Thy God hath anointed Thee with the oil of gladness above Thy fellows. All Thy gar- ments smell of myrrh, aloes, and cassia." The Latin Fathers, following the Vulgate, explain the passage somewhat differently. As they often speak of the Apostles and Doctors of the Church as the breasts of s Just Org CJhrist, so they call them heve fragrant, because emi- ■ nent for miracles and holiness, so that the perfume of their righteousness came abroad, giving delight and refreshment to their hearers. And in this sense we may take the words of S. Paul : " Now thanks be unto Theodoret. Ps. xlv. 8. 1. 3.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 9 God, which always causeth us to triumph in Cheist, 2Cor. ii.i4. and maketh manifest the savour of His knowledge by us in every place, for we are unto God a sweet savour of Cheist." S. Bernard, who supposes the breasts to be of the Bride as well as of the Bridegroom, tells us that she is fragrant with the triple unction of contri- Serm. x. tion, devotion, and of piety ; the first pungent, caus- ing pain, the second lenitive, soothing pain, the third healing, and even expelling disease. The first is made by the soul breaking and grinding her sins in the mor- tar of conscience, and then distilling them within the crucible of a glowing heart with the fire of penitence and grief, that she may say, " My heart was hot within Ps. xxxix. 4. me, and while I was thus musing, the fire kindled." That is the ointment wherewith the sinner anointed the feet of Cheist. The second ointment is not to be found on earth, but has to be sought afar. " Every g james i good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and 17. Cometh down from the Father of lights," and the un- guent of devotion is formed of the blessings which the Divine bounty has bestowed on man, pondered in the vessel of the heart, heated with the fire of longing, and blended with the oil of gladness. With this we anoint not the feet of Cheist, but His head. The Serm. xii. third ointment, of piety, or lovingkindness, is made from the sufferings of others, from the wants of the poor, the burdens of the oppressed, the troubles of the sad, the errors of the sinful, blended with the oil of mercy, heated with the fire of love. This is the oint- ment which we must buy, as Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome did, and anoint therewith the whole Body of Jesus, by helping every suffering member of It. Beturning to the truer Ghisierius. sense of the passage, we see how true of the holy soul which desires Cheist is that saying of the Wise Man, *' Ointment and perfume delight the heart." And this Prov. xxvii. twofold gladdening is set forth by S. Peter, saying, 9- *' God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Acts x. 33. Ghost and with power," and He in turn gives us these same blessings, " doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil," giving that consolation which earthly wisdom cannot bestow, and that healing which human physicians know not. And Bupert, dwelling ^^pg^^ in his wonted manner on the graces of the Mother of God, does not fail to point out the correspondence of the Angel's words to her with those of S. Peter spoken 10 A COMMENTARY ON [1.3. S. Luke 36. S. John xii. Corn, a Lap. Ecclus. xxiv. 15. Didymus. Ps. Ixxvi. 1 Ps. vui. 1. Lib. de Virgin. 3. Isa xlii. 6. Isa. L 4. Origen. Phil. ii. 7. Orat. de Nativ. Eusebius. S. Just. Org Theodoret. Beda. Joel ii. 28. S. John iii. 34. of her Son : " The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee," so that she was truly the house filled with the odour of the ointment, and, rejoicing in the fragrance of that perfume granted to her, might say, " I yield a pleasant odour like the best myrrh, as galbanum, and onyx, and sweet storax, and as the fume of frankincense in the tabernacle." Thy Name is as ointment 'poured forth. Before the coming of Cheist the Name of God was inclosed, as in a vial, amongst the Hebrew people alone, as it is written, " In Jewry is God known, His Name is great in Israel." But now we can more fitly say, " O Loed our Governor, how excellent is Thy Name in all the world." " That ointment," says S. Ambrose, " existed eternally, but it was with the JFathee, in the Fathee. Its perfume was known to Angels and Archangels above, as inclosed within the vase of heaven. The Pathee said, ' I will give Thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles.' The Son came down, and all things were filled with the new fragrance. .... The Son of God kept that fragrance at first in His Body, as though in a vase, biding His time, as He saith Himself, ' The Loed God hath given Me the tongue of the learned, that I should know how to speak a word in season.' The time came, He opened His mouth, and the ointment was poured forth when power went out of Him. This ointment was poured forth upon the Jews, and gathered up by the Gentiles, was poured forth in Judsea and perfumed all lands." Origen, pressing the exact meaning of the LXX. version, emjp- tied out, reminds us how " Cheist Jesus emptied (iKevoccre) Himself, and took upon Him the form of a servant." *' He Who is full," exclaims S. Gregory Nazianzen, "is emptied, drained of His glory for a short time, that I might be partaker of His fulness." But it is not merely the knowledge of God which is so poured forth, but His Name. What name ? And first they answer that it is the Name of Cheist, itself denoting " anointed," which is poured forth, not only by being widely preached, but because it is poured on all the faithful in the waters df Baptism, wherein they are given the title of Christians. And this is what the Prophet foretold, saying, *' I will pour out My Spieit upon all flesh." Pour out, not drop out, for " God giveth not the Spieit by measure." Poured forth, ( 1.3.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 11 adds S. Gregory tlie Great, because whoso are Chris- s.Greg.M. tians in truth as well as in name, abound with the streams of holy charity, which soften them, and make them fit for kindling, so that they break forth in the flames of good example ; and, as another expositor re- marks, also with that love for the Creator kindled in the creature when Cheist died for us. He was known phuo carp. but little before His Passion, says one more Greek Father, but when His life was poured forth upon the Theodoret. Cross, when the alabaster shrine of His most sacred xauier. Body was broken, the Apostles, filled with the perfume of that sweet ointment, traversed sea and land, filling the whole world with its fragrance. S. Augustine calls Jerusalem the vase wherein that ointment, which ?. August, he takes to be God's mercy, was first shut up, but "^ when the rebellious city was broken and destroyed, then the unguent pervaded all nations. And, as when the precious oil which has been in a vase is poured forth, we can only guess at its nature by the few re- maining drops and the perfume, so the Name of God is mysterious, and no title which divines can invent discloses His nature and excellence. We conjecture g Q^eg. Him only by the effects of His working, by the fra- Nyss. grance which He diffuses, and therefore He is like ointment poured forth. But the Name of Cheist, royal, priestly, holy though it be, is yet only a title of office, by which all His servants may address their King. His Bride must have some dearer, closer, more personal name by which to call Him. " If you write," g^^^^ ^^ says she in the words of S. Bernard, " it has no savour for me unless I read Jesus there. If you argue or discuss, it has no savour for me, unless the sound of Jesus be there. Jesus is honey in the mouth, melody in the ear, gladness in the heart. And it is medicine too. Is any of you sad ? Let Jesus come into his heart, and thence leap into his mouth, and lo, as the Name of Light issues forth, every cloud disperses, and the clear sky returns. Does any fall into sin, and hasten thence in despair to the snare of death ? If he invoke the Name of Life, will he not breathe again to life ? Who ever found hardness of heart, torpor of sloth, rancour of soul, languor of indifference, able to stand before the face of that saving Name ? Who is there, whose fountain of tears has chanced to dry up, that does not burst forth more plentifully and flow more gently into weeping, when he invokes Jesus ? Who 12 A COMMENTARY ON [1.3. Ps. 1. 15. Nic. Argent, Phil. ii.9. The Hymn, Gloriosi Sal- vatoris. Targum. S. Greg. M. S. Ambros. Ps. ciii. 5. Cassio- dorus. Aponius. S. Anselm. Laud on. is there, quivering and trembling in peril, to whom that Name of Might invoked has not straightway given confidence and banished fear. P Who, I ask, swaying and wavering in doubt, has not at once seen certainty shine forth at the invocation of that Name of Henown? Who, fearing in adversity and already fainting, has ever lacked strength if the Name of Help has sounded ? These are all diseases and weaknesses of the soul, and that is their medicine. And you may prove it. ' Call upon Me in the time of trouble, so will I hear thee, and thou shalt praise Me.' " That Name is truly oil poured forth, for it refreshes the weary, heals the sick, lightens the blind, and floats high above all other names, for " God hath given Him a Name which is above every name, that at the Name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth." Name of gladness, Name of pleasure, By the tongue ineffable, Name of sweetness passing measure, To the ear delectable ; 'Tis our safeguard and our treasure, 'Tis our help 'gainst sin and hell. 'Tis the Name for adoration, 'Tis the Name of victory, 'Tis the Name for meditation In the vale of misery : 'Tis the Name for veneration By the citizens on high. Therefore do the virgins love Thee. The earliest of all comments on this Song, the Chaldee paraphrase, ex- plains these words in full accordance with the spirit of Christian writers, as denoting the righteous who follow after the goodness of God. And first it is to be noted that the Hebrew word Ty^u?]^^ alamoth implies not only virginity, but youth, and accordingly the LXX. gives veaj/tSes, and the Vulgate adolescentulce. What then are these young damsels who love the Bridegroom? They answer, in the first place, that they are souls newly born in Baptism, having put oflf the old man and the wrinkles of sin, and renewed their youth as an eagle. And they are well called damsels, because the Saints, conscious of their own weakness, love all the more for that reason Cheist their strength. Others, dwelling yet more on the admission of fragility, see here souls yet imperfectly taught, and only beginning XX. I. 3.] THE SONG OP SONGS. 13 to run tlieir course, being still weak in tKe faith. "WTiereupon Eupert aptly remarks, " Had not the oint- Rupert, ment been poured forth, had not the Woed been made flesh, imperfect souls never would have dared to love God, nor even to hear Him, as they said, when it had not yet been poured forth, * Let not God speak with ^^od. us, lest we die.' " And S. Thomas of Villanova bids ^^' us remark further, that the Bride saith that the virgins love Him because His Name is as oil poured out, be- cause their fire of devotion is but newly kindled, and needs this fuel. She does not say this of herself, be- ^'ym^'^va cause her fire has long since been kindled to a clear flame, and she loves Him for Himself alone, and even when He gives no oil. They want Thine, she cries to Him, I want Thee. And some extend the meaning s. Just. Orp. yet further, to newly planted Churches, not as yet fully established, but zealous in their first love. Others again, looking rather to the idea of purity than of weakness, prefer to see here the holiest and most per- fect Churches and souls. Martyrs who have attained their crown, says one Father. All healthy and vigo- Phiio Carp, rous souls, says another, neither in their infancy, too young to understand love, nor in their dotage, too old to retain it, but in the mid flower of their spiritual life and beauty, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such Nyssen. thing. And thus the words tell us of the early zeal of the Christian Church, when the memory of the Apostles was still fresh in the minds of the faithful, and the crown of martyrdom was often sought and won. Wherefore com. a Lap. the Apostle saith, " I have espoused you to one hus- 2 cor. xi.2. band, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Cheist." " Literally, too," notes the Ecstatic Doctor, " it means the consecrated virgins, those elect maidens, Dion, earth, those virtuous damsels, many of whom, for Thy sake, despised not only the riches of the whole world, its delights, its honours, and all its outward pomp, its vanity and lightness : but most manfully endured the crudest deaths, and happily triumphed ; as the holy Katharine, the famous Ursula, and countless others like them, who served Thee most constantly in vir- ginity of soul and body, and to the present day un- numbered others, abandoning in their youth this evil world with all its deceit, enter convents and holy retirements, wherein abiding always inclosed, they give themselves up to Thy pure embraces in the spirit." And of such we may cite the words of a great 14 A COMMENTARY ON [1.4. S. Cyprian. De Hab. Virg. 1 . Cassio- dorus. Beda. Haymo. Lyranus. John vi S. John xii. 32. S. Bruno Ast. Santolius Victorinus, The Hymn, Nobis, Olt/mpo. S. Bernard. Serm. in Cant. 21. Saint and Martyr in the early Church : " The flower of the Church's bud, the glory and ornament of spiritual grace, the joyous disposition, the perfect and untar- nished work of honour and praise, the image of God answering to the holiness of the Loed, the more illus- trious portion of the flock of Christ. The glorious fruitfulness of our Mother the Church exults through them, and abundantly blossoms in them, and by how much the more the great band of virgins adds to its own number, so much does it increase its Mother's joy." 4 Draw me, we will run after thee : the king hath brought me into his chambers; we will be glad and rejoice in thee, we will remember thy love more than wine : the upright love thee. Draw me. They say, some of them, that the speaker is now changed, that whereas the Synagogue expressed in the former verses her longing for Cheist's Advent, now we have the Gentile Church eager to come to Him. But it is far better to hold here by the view which recognizes the substantial identity of the Jewish and Christian Churches, and sees but the one Bride throughout, at first expecting, and then receiving, her Spouse. She says draw me, because she knows herself to be too weak to reach Him of herself, for He hath said, " No man can come to Me, except the Fathee Which hath sent Me draw him." Draw me to Thy Cross, whereof Thou hast said, " And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto Me." Draw me yet further, after Thee in Thine Ascension, that I may not be left desolate here on earth, but rest and be with Thee evermore. And so the hymn : Christ, Who hast prepared a place For us beside Thy throne of grace, Draw us, we pray, with cords of love, From exile to our home above. But why draw 1 Does the Bride need to be drawn after the Bridegroom, as though she followed Him unwill- ingly ? Nay, it denotes no reluctance, any more than an invalid feels in being drawn to his bath or to his food, though a criminal may well need being drawn to judg- ment or to execution. She longs to be drawn, and there- fore prays for it, which she would not do were she able to follow her Beloved at her will. But why can she not .^ I. 4.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 15 Are we to call her at once weak and the Bride ? If one of the virgins complained of weakness and asked to be drawn, we should not marvel, but does it not seem strange that the Bride, who ought to seem able to draw others, as being strong and perfect, should herself need, as weak and feeble, to be drawn ? But it is that she may follow the steps of His conversation, imitating His example, learning His discipline. And to do all this she needs His aid, that she may renounce herself, take up her Cross, and follow Cheist. What marvel if she need to be drawn, who runs behind a Giant, who seeks to overtake Him Who " cometh leaping upon the ^^^^^ jj g mountains, skipping upon the hills ?" For, she saith, pg cxivU. " His WoKD runneth very swiftly." She cannot run 15. at an equal pace, nor rival His swiftness " Who re- pg. xix. 6. joiceth as a giant to run His race :" her strength is insufficient, and she prays to be drawn. I am weary, she saith, I faint, leave me not, but dratv me after Thee, lest I should wander after other lovers, lest I should run uncertainly. Draw me, for it is better for me that Thou shouldst use any force against me, awing me with threats, chastening with scourges, than, spar- ing me, leave me perilously secure in my sloth. Draw me, even if I be unwilling, to make me fain, draw me when slothful, to make me run. " Behold, O Heavenly Bridegroom, O sweetest Jesu," exclaims a true servant of His, " my spirit strives to cling faith- ^i^"- earth, fully unto Thee, to rest in Thee, to give itself up to Thee alone in loving contemplation, but a thousand hindrances draw me back, delay me, stop my way. My understanding is wavering, my reason weak, my will inclined to vain and evil things, sensuality drags me down, the needs of daily life keep me busy with earthly and tangible cares, the temptations of the senses beset me, the world and the hosts of evil spirits attack us on every side, and I walk in the midst of snares, in the thick of grievous perils, and, besides, the weight of my sinful flesh depresses me. What then am I to do save fly to Thy most gracious help, and with the deepest longing of my heart pray. Draw me after Thee, evermore hold, bedew, enlighten, aid, and comfort my heart. For Thou hast said in Hosea hos. xi. 4. the Prophet, ' I drew thee with cords of a man, with bands of love ;' and in Jeremiah, ' I have loved thee jer_ xxxi. 3. with an everlasting love, therefore with loving-kind- ness have I drawn thee.' " And in this drawing, which 16 A COMMENTARY ON [1.4. Henr, Harphius. Eccl. iv. 12. y. Aug. in S. Johan. xxxvi. 4. Ps.xxxvii.4 Virg. Eclog. Theocloret. Pseuclo- Dionys. de Div. Nom. 3, Serm. xxi. Corn, a Lap, consists in leading the human will into union with the Divine will, as the magnet draws the iron to itself, the Three Persons of the Holy Trinity co-operate, the Fa- ther drawing by His power, the Son by His wisdom, the Holy Ghost by His goodness, a threefold cord which is not quickly broken. " And even to be drawn by your will is but little," says the Doctor of Grace, " you are drawn by pleasure also. What is to be drawn by pleasure ? ' Delight thou in the Loed, and He will give thee thy heart's desire.' There is a plea- sure of the heart to which that heavenly Bread is sweet. And if the poet could say, — Trahit sua quemque voluptas, not necessity, but pleasure ; not compulsion, but de- light ; how much more forcibly may we say that a man is drawn to Cheist, when he delights in truth, delights in blessedness, delights in righteousness, delights in everlasting life, all which is Cheist .P" The LXX. reading, Thei/ have draion Thee, referring to the virgins who love Cheist, comes in fact to the same thing, for they do not draw till they have first been drawn. And an ancient writer compares this drawing of God towards us to men in a ship pulling at a rope which is attached to a rock. They seem to draw the rock to them, but they are in fact drawing themselves to it. We will run nfter Thee. And first it is to be noted how the address changes. Draw me, and ice will run. Why does the Bride thus speak ? It is, answers S. Bernard, because draiving tells of weakness, of trial, of suffering, all which the Bride ]3refers to bear alone, as better able to endure them than the tender virgins. She is willing that they should partake of the conso- lations which are implied in running, that they should share her joy, but not her sorrow. But this is forced and poor compared with the simpler explanation of an older writer, who says that the Church uses the sin- gular form at first, as denoting her unity, and then the plural, because she is made up of many faithful, nay, of many ranks and degrees of the faithful. Draio me, then, she says, in my corporate character, draw my prelates and pastors, that they may in their turn draw on the virgins, the tender flock committed to their charge. Secondly, whereas the Bride's weakness made it needful for her to be drawn, her confidence in the strength to be given her is such that she does not say. I. 4.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 17 "We will follow," nor "We will walk," but " We origen. will run," and therein she is like the Apostle, who s. Greg. m. said to his children, " So run, that ye may obtain." i cor. ix.24. The LXX. and Vulgate here add some words not in the Hebrew, and read the whole sentence thus : Draw me after Thee, tve will run for the odour of Thine oint- ments. When we think on those gifts of grace, faith, hope, and charity, which all come from Cheist, and strive to imitate the examples of His Saints and Mar- phiio Carp, tyrs, who displayed them in their lives, we are run- ning, says an ancient Father, after the odour of Sis ointments. When those same gifts are vouchsafed to ourselves, notes another, we do not thereby cease to Angeiomus run, rather we are kindled with longing for the Beatific luxov. Vision, and haste eagerly towards the source of the fragrance which delights us. And in this sense S. Au- gustine takes it : " Let us love and copy Him. Let in Ps. xc. us run after His ointments ; for He came and gave forth perfume, and His fragrance filled the whole world. Whence was that fragrance ? From heaven. Follow Him then to heaven, if thou givest no false answer to those words, ' Lift up your hearts,' lift up your thoughts, lift up your love, lift up your hope." " If His Name alone can do all this," exclaims Origen, origen. " if its perfume so cause and strengthen the virgins to run, what will be the virtue and height they shall at- tain when they reach His very self, incomprehensible, ineffable P I think if they do so attain, they will walk no more, nor run, but cling closely to Him, bound with the cords of love, that no more removal shall be possible, but they may be one with Him." And they inquire further what are these various ointments of Hugo Card. His which draw eager souls, like gallant hounds, upon His track. S. Bernard replies by quoting the Apostle, ||^; ^^ ^" " Cheist Jesus, Who of God is made unto us wisdom, 1 cor. i. 30. and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption ;" and shows how different Saints ran for each of these, as Nicodemus, seeking to learn the deep things of God, desired wisdom ; Mary Magdalene and S. Peter in their penitence, seeking righteousness ; S. Paul and those who like him had left all, that they might be like unto Cheist, sought for sanctification; and the Martyrs, eager to share in the Passion of Cheist, yearned for that redemption which was paid upon the Cross. Akin to this is another interpretation, which names the oint- ments as three. First, Cheist's preaching, giving Nic. Argent. 18 A COMMENTARY ON [1.4. Parez. Com. h Lap Ep, 175, ad Julittam. Philipp. Harveng. Origen. Targum. S. HJeron. Theodoret. S. Greg. M. S. Just. Org. Hugo Card. light and healing error, after which Saints run wisely. Secondly, Cheist's conversation, kindling affection, and healing our moral nature, for which one needs to run sweetly. Thirdly, Cheist's miraculous working, which strengthens, and keeps in the course of good works, and this makes us to run mightily. And as God led the Hebrews in the wilderness after the Ark of the Covenant, fragrant with incense, so Cheist, the True Ark of the Loed, goes before us in the desert of this world, perfumed with holiness and power, and we can do no less than follow Him. Or you may take the words in a more literal sense, referring them to the various anointings used in the Church, as in Baptism, whereby we are made Cheist's soldiers, and begin to run our race ; in Confirmation, when we receive addi- tional strength, that we faint not in our course ; in Ordination, when priests and prelates are given es- pecial charge to follow close upon Cheist, and to draw the people after them in the same way by setting them a holy and fragrant example. Thus, quaintly observes S. Basil, pigeon-fanciers catch doves, by sending out a dove smeared with perfume, which attracts others to it by the fragrance, and allures them into the dove-cot. The King hath brought me into His chambers. Here is the first explanation of who that^e is Whose kisses the Bride desires. The Bride does not yet call Him her Bridegroom, nor her Beloved, but her King, that she may glory in His power and riches. He, like David, is Shepherd and King, and appears in both characters in the Song. Into His chambers. Doubt- less royal ones, as befits a king, and heaped with riches. The words used by the LXX. and Vulgate {Tafxi^lov, cellaria,) denote a store-room, or place where treasures or provisions are kept. And much of the traditional interpretation is in accordance with this view. The Targum, which sees throughout the Song a history of God's dealings with Israel, explains this passage of the people being brought to the foot of Sinai, there to be given the Law out of the Treasury of the Most High. And most of the Christian Fathers see here the reve- lation of God's mysteries to the Church, or to the faithful soul, differing, however, as to the exact mean- ing of the chambers. Some take them of Holy Writ, the storehouse of God's oracles. S. Bernard and Cardinal Hugo, accepting this view, amplify it by dwelling on the four senses of Scripture, as separate chambers I. 4.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 19 witli yarions stores. The first chamber is the Historical sense, containing the coarser food intended for the slaves and cattle. Secondly, comes the Tropological, with its three compartments, severally containing oil and wine for refreshment, balms and spices for delight, and ointments for healing. The third chamber is Al- legory, wherein are the arms of the warriors, the golden shields, and the spears of Solomon, to wit, the mys- teries of Cheist and the Church Militant. Fourth is Anagoge, wherein is nought but pure gold and precious stones, that is, whatever belongeth to everlasting life. Others will have it that the foretaste of the joys of cassio- heaven, granted to certain Saints by faith or by direct dorus. revelation, is intended. S. Ambrose takes it of the Aponius. mystery of the Atonement, revealed to the Bride after s.Ans.Laud. the Passion and Eesurrection of Cheist, by the preach- s. Ambros. ing of the Apostles ; and in another place, of the visions Sb! je^^'^' and joys granted in contemplation or trance, as to S. Isaac. Paul, when he was caught up to the third heaven ; and ^ Cor. xii. in yet a third passage, of the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. Philo stands alone in understanding the chamber to be that human Body of Cheist wherein the P^iio CJarp. Eternal Woed tabernacled. And note, that whereas it is said, " We will run after thee," here we read, origen. " The King hath brought 7ne in," implying that He s. Greg, withdrew her for a time from the virgins which be her g^leVnard fellows, and that she now returns to tell them what great things He had done for her, wherein they rejoice. All run, but only one is perfect, who so runs as to . obtain, and alone receives the palm, and becomes a "^®"* Queen. Here they tell us not only, as before, of the jUnityof the Church, and of the rarity of perfect souls, but point out how there is one in especial of whom the words are most true, even her to whom the King gave Himself as a Son, and who, entering into the house "^^'" ' of Elizabeth, was greeted by her cousin and the unborn Phiiipp. babe, saying, in effect. We will rejoice and be glad in thee. ^^'^'^^^' Whether these latter words be addressed by the Bride cassio. to Cheist, or by the virgins to Him or her, they are dorus. alike thanksgivings and not boastings. If they be ad- ^- ^^^^ ^' dressed to the Bridegroom, the;y are the joint voices origen. " )f the Spouse and her companions, she for what she s. Greg, las already obtained, they because of that promise, s.^Bemard. ' The virgins which be her fellows .... with joy and Ps. xiv. 15, ladness shall they be brought, and enter into the *^' Swing's palace." If they be congratulations to the c2 20 A COMMENTARY ON [1.4. S.Ans.Laud. Origen. Cassiodor. S. Greg. M. Theodoret. S. Ambros. S. Greg. Nyssen. S. Greg. M. S. Thomas Aquinas. Prov. xxiv. 16. Nic. Argent. Serm. xxiv. Bride, they are, observes S. Anselm of Laon, a promise on their part to make themselves ready in body and spirit for her fellowship, that they may enter in also. We will remember thy love more than toine. Here again they differ as to whether these words are spoken to the Bridegroom or to the Bride. Taking the former view, we note first that it is said, " We loill remember." It is a promise for the future, on the part of those who have not yet attained so high a spiritual level as to care little for earthly wine. Here too, as in the second verse, the A. Y. reading love, appears in the LXX. and Vulgate as breasts. As before, too, it is explained of the lowly and gentle teaching of Cheist, contrasted with the austerity of the Law, and S. Gregory the Great dwells here on the tender love which Cheist showed the Church when He hung dying on the Cross. If the words be addressed to the Bride, then it is the voice of her children, saying. Because thou hast loved the breasts of Cheist above the wine of pleasure and of worldly wisdom, we too will love thy teaching, because the Righteous loveth thee. Two of the Fathers allego- rize the passage of S. John the Divine, who leant on the breast of Jesus at the Last Supper. The upright love thee. Here they all dwell on the intimate and necessary connection between true holiness of life and the love of Cheist, showing that the latter never can be in any great measure in the soul which does not aim at the former. The upright, not those who al- ways stand, for "the just man falleth seven times," but those whose intention is right, even when their performance is imperfect. Upright, because they stand looking up to their Creator, not bowed down to the creature. S. Bernard dwells at some length on the form of the human body as enforcing this thought, but does not in effect say more than a heathen poet had said before him : Ovid. Metaph. i. 84. Pronaque quum spectent animalia csetera terrain, Os homini sublime dedit : coelumque videre Jussit, et erectos ad sidera tollere vultus. "WTiile other creatures downward look on earth, He gave to man a towering face, and bade Him lift his upward gaze to sky and stars. Alanus. Right, also, because they keep to the middle of the King's highway, never swerving aside, but journeying 1.5.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 21 straight on towards heaven, and seeking God for His own dear sake. 5 I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the cur- tains of Solomon. The Targum takes this of the fall and rising again Targum. of Israel, when the golden calf was made, whereby the chosen people became as hlach as the Ethiopians in idolatry, but afterwards, repenting, became comely once more, and returned to the service of GrOD, making cur^tains for His tabernacle. And similarly many Chris- ^"^p- tian writers see in it the Church, or the penitent soul, ad Eustoch. speaking of her past sins and present conversion to 22. God. S. Gregory the Great recognizes here the con- ^- Bernard, flict of the higher and lower wills in the soul. She is s. Greg. M. hlack, not only by reason of past sins, but of present ones, and yet comely, because she is striving after that righteousness of which she is conscious within. It is the soul of a catechumen, says Origen, already comely Origen. through repentance, but not yet white, because not admitted to the cleansing of Baptism. Or again, s. August, black by nature, comely by grace. Yet once more, p^^^^'j the Church is black with suffering and persecution, cassiodor. and nevertheless comely in holiness and in reward, nay, ^Ans.Laud. adds S. Bernard, even more comely because of that ^onast.^'^ ' blackness. The address to the daughters of Jerusalem instit. 84. has led more than one Father to see here the Gen- Tiitodoret ' tile Church, confessing her lowly and heathen origin, and yet asserting the truth of her calling in Christ, and therefore claiming acknowledgment from the Sy- nagogue, or even from the Jewish Christians, just as the J^thiopian wife of Moses made good her claim Numb. xii. against Aaron and Miriam. Not very dissimilar is the view of those Greek Fathers who, taking the words of ph^g ^arp. the whole Church, see in the blackness the Gentile Theodoret. element, and in the comeliness the Hebrew. Akin to this in spirit is the interpretation that the mixed cha- s. August. racter of the Church, as made up of saints and sinners, Doct. Christ. is implied. And finally, Rupert reminds us how Our s!'Eu"cher. Lady's purity was doubted, when she was found to be Beda. with child, so that she was blackened by injurious thoughts, while comely indeed, as full of grace, the taber- Rupert, nacle of our true Solomon. Black, too, as the Mother cuiieim. of Sorrows, when she stood by the Cross, despised Parv. 22 A COMMENTARY ON [1.5. Honorius. Origen. Hugo Card. Origen. Philo Carp. Beda. Origen. Hugo Card. Ps. cxx. 4. S. Greg. M. S. Bernard. Rev. iii. 12. Aponius. Gloss. Cassiodor. Gal. V. 24. with, her Son, comely in the joy of His Resurrection. Daughters of Jerusalem. Which Jerusalem, that which now is, and is in bondage with her children, or that which is above, and free, the mother of us all ? Origen takes the former view, and makes it a call to the Jewish nation. Cardinal Hugo and others refer it to the Angels and spirits made perfect, the appeal of the Church Militant to the Church Triumphant. As the tents of Kedar. The tents of the Ishmaelites, formed of coarse goats' hair, and black, or dark, as Kedar means, are taken as the types of sin, of suffer- ing, or of Gentilism, and contrasted with the costly hangings, or curtains of Solomon, made for the adorn- ment of the temple, or, following the Arabic Version, the monarch's own pavilions of state. And so the Church is despised outwardly by her persecutors, yet is glorious and adorned within. Even Kedar, as descend- ing from Abraham, was not altogether without a share in the Divine blessing, and Solomon inherited the sure mercies of David, therefore, O daughters of Jerusalem, despise not me, says the Gentile Church, who am that Ethiopian woman whom Moses took as his wife. Others, remembering that it is written, "Woe is me that I am constrained to dwell with Mesech, and to Iiave my habitation among the tents of Kedar," take these te7its to be the sojourn of the soul in the pilgrim- age and wars of the body, while the curtains speak to us of that temple of which it is written that he which entereth in shall go no more out. The Church, says another, most deeply, is like the tents of Kedar, for she shelters under her wings penitents stained with their sins. She is like the curtains of Solomon, as sur- rounding wise, and peaceful, and holy Saints. C^ir- tains of Solomon. The Body of Christ, touchingly notes the Gloss, is truly called a curtain, because it was stretched out upon the Cross to shelter us. For curtai^is the LXX. and Vulgate have skins. And that, says Cassiodorus, because as tabernacles are made from the skins of dead animals, so the Church, which, is God's tabernacle, is framed of those who have mor- tified themselves with the affections and lusts. Yet again, the verse tells us of the hardships and repulsive- ness of the higher Christian life, as it appears to the world, rough, sombre, and uncomely, whereas those who are within see round them, not the black goats' hair of the tent of warfare, but the purple, gemmed. I. 6.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 23 and golden tapestry of the Prince of Peace, into Whose Honorius. chambers of the celestial life they have entered. 6 Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me : my mother^s children were angry with me ; they made me keeper of the vineyards, but mine own vineyard have I not kept. They take the first clauses in various senses, accord- ing as they explain the sun to be the heat of temp- s. Greg, tation and of suffering, or the warmth of Cheist. ^y^^^'^- Wonder not that I am black, though not created so, Aponius. because the fire of evil temptation hath scorched me, and dried up that once green germ in me which lacked Beda. root. Marvel not at the persecutions which I have to endure, and " faint not at my tribulations, which is your Eph. m. i3. glory," for those very trials have given me patience and constancy. And just as bodies which habitually rest in the shade wither up in the broad glare of day, whereas those which move about and labour in the light scarcely feel the effects of heat, so those toilsome ones .^^ Amos^m who prepare themselves for struggles and temptations, overcome the world, and win that blessing, " The sun ps. cxxi. 6. shall not burn thee by day, neither the moon by night." If the sun be Christ, then the words may denote that s.Ans.Laud. the sufferings which the Church endures at the hand of her enemies are for His sake. Who is the Sun of Righteousness; or again, that burning zeal for His S.Bernard, house hath eaten her up, or longing for Himself hath consumed her. Or you may take it with S. Gregory, s. Greg. m. that Saints, whatever progress they may seem to make in holiness, and however they may be looked on by men as burning and shining lights, yet feel themselves Angeiomus to be utter blackness when compared with the perfect "^°^- righteousness of Christ, for the nearer we draw to- wards grace, the more we learn our sin. And there are not wanting those who apply the words to Christ irimbert. Himself, despised and rejected in His Passion, so that He was " as a root out of a dry ground ; He hath no isa. im. 2. form nor comeliness." My another's children were angry with me. They Origen. take'it first of the trials of the Primitive Church, op- g.^Bei-nard. pressed by Jewish persecutors, once headed by S. Paul, gioss. and children of the Church's mother, the Synagogue, 24 A COMMENTARY ON [1.6. 2'^^?!^^' ^^* ^^^ ^^^ brethren. And next, of the Judaizing c'xix. ' pai'ty within the Church herself, who endeavoured to s. Just. Org. impose the ceremonial Law on the Gentile converts. And they dwell on the forcible wording of the LXX. and Vulgate, which translate thus : They fought against me. It was true also of those heretics and evil Chris- Dion. Carth. tians who arose in later days in the bosom of the Church, the Arians and schismatics, and evil rulers, especially unworthy Bishops, who rend instead of Aponius. guarding the flock. And, taking the words of the soul, instead of the Church, we may see here either the strife carried on against it by its own passions and de- sires, akin as these are to its higher and better aspira- tions ; or, more generally, the resistance of lax and worldly Christians to those who strive to serve God Com. a Lap. more perfectly, and that especially in the Religious life ; for those who are without resist the vocation of such Nic. Argent, as feel themselves called thereto, and those within but too often war against such as would recall them to the full strictness of their rule, as many a reformer, like S. Gregory VII. or S. Teresa, has proved. And there- Ps. ixix. 8. fore it is written in another place, " I am become a stranger unto my brethren, even an alien unto my Origen. mother's children." We may, however, take the words s.'^Bernard! ^^ ^ good sense also, of those wise teachers. Apostles and others, who seek to war against the sins of Chris- tians, and who give them a charge to keep. Cassiodor, They made me the keeper of the vi7ieyards. In their Lyranus ^^^^ attempt to crush the infant Church, the Jews were the involuntary cause of its rapid spread beyond the limits of Palestine into every part of the Gentile world ; hut, adds the Church, mine own vineyard have I Cassiodor. not kept, because I have been forced to abandon the Jews to their own devices. And so the Apostles, "It Acts xiu. 46. was necessary that the Word of God should first have been spoken to you : but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles." There are some who see here the story of Adam's s. Greg. fall. Made by God the keeper of the garden of Eden, Nyssen. J^e was fought against by the serpent and by Eve, and kept not his vineyard. Others explain it of the great peril of high oifice in the Church, lest, when men are set, not merely to labour in this vineyard, but to over- GhfsieiSS' ^^® other labourers, and to prevent the incursions of robbers, they neglect the care of their own souls, and, I. 7.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 25 after preaching to others, become castaways. There is another sense, however, in which the words may be taken, of that Good Shepherd Who laid down His life for the sheep, and was not careful of Himself, so long as His peril might be the salvation of others, and iJ^^^ert. Who, because He thus gave up His own vineyard, was made keeper of all others. And so speaks the aged Apostle, in the very strongest sense : " I could wish i^on^- i^. 3. that myself were accursed from Christ for my bre- thren, my kinsmen according to the flesh." S. Am- Exhort, ad brose, referring the vineyard to the state of consecrated ^^"^^^ virginity, warns the brides of C heist lest they should suffer any Ahab or Jezebel to turn their vineyard from a place wherein sweet fruits grow, into a mere garden of pot-herbs, into a secular form of life, good in its degree, but not comparable to the better way. And if so, much more does it befit Religious to beware lest when their Loed comes. He should say, " I went by 30. ' ' the vineyard of the man void of understanding ; and, lo, it was all overgrown with thorns, and nettles had covered the face thereof." 7 Tell me, O thou whom ray soul loveth, where thou feedest, where thou makest thy flock to rest at noon : for why should I be as one that turneth aside by the flocks of thy companions ? Tliou %vliom my soul loveth. " So I call Thee, for s. Greg. Thy Name surpasseth all thought and understanding, Sg^^^i nor could all creation reach so high as to express or comprehend it. Thy Name, then, that by which Thy goodness is known, is the affection of my soul to Thee, for how should I not love Thee, Who so lovedst me, even when I was so black, as to lay down Thy life for Thy sheep, which Thou feedest. For greater love than this cannot enter into thought, that Thou boughtest my salvation with Thine own life." Where Thou feed- est. Not Thyself, but Thy sheep. And where is it save in that Sacrament of the Altar, in which Thou ^*^^°^* givest the nourishment of Thy Passion and the foun- tain streaming from Thy side to all devout souls? To rest at noon. They take it in many ways. And first, let us see here, with the old Cypriote Bishop, that mysterious time when Jesus, wearied with His long Phiio Carp, journey of thirty-three years, and its last blood-printed 26 A COMMENTARY ON [1.7. The Hymn, Patris Sapientia. Cassiodor. Beda. S. Greg. M, Origen. Horn. 1. Theodoret. S. Ambros. in Ps. cxis. Apoiiius. footsteps along the Way of Sorrows, sat thus on the "Well of our salvation, and it was about the sixth hour, and there was darkness until the ninth hour. He upon that Cross at Sext for our sake was mounted ; By tlie passers-by reviled, with transgressors counted : Vinegar and gall they give to His thirst to slake it, Which, when He had tasted of, He refused to take it. A-gain, noon, as the time of greatest warmth, fitly de- notes especial seasons of trial and persecution in the Church, urging her to call on her Loed to be a shadow from the heat, lest she faint therein. S. Gregory ap- plies it rather to the fiery assaults of sin, when the Bride seeks the coolness of sanctifying grace. Once more, the Bride would fain see the full glory of her Beloved, would see Him in the clear light of faith and love, undimmed by any darkness. " I ask not," she says, "as to other times, where Thou feedest at even- ing, or morning, or at sunset. I ask of that time when, in the flower of the day, Thou art in the fullest light clothed in the splendour of Thy Majesty." Others will have it that the Church, in her clear brightness as the light of the world, is intended by the noon-day. For as she preaches the doctrine of Christ everywhere throughout the world, and is therefore fitly styled Catholic, contrasting with the dark heretical sects which lurk in the corners of single nations, she is like the noon spread over the heavens. And, because it is noon when the sun is in mid-sky, so as Christ, the Sun of Eighteousness, is the Head of the Church, directly over her, giving her light and warmth, the epithet suits her well. And if it be objected that she is not yet all clear and bright, that dark spots of sin mar the beauty of her face, yet the words hold good of her Saints. " They," says the Father last cited, " who have received Thee as the Author of salvation, are in the noon-day. Thou shinest on them, Thy grace, as the noon, warms them. Thou hast become the noon of them who feed on Thy riches, and trust in Thee," Andanother tells us that these especial sheep of Christ, whom He keeps with Himself in the noon-day warmth of His love, whom He does not merely guide with His staff", but cherishes in His bosom, are those virginal souls which have given themselves to Him alone, forsak- ing earthly ties for Him. Yet again, you may take the passage, with two great mystical writers, to denote the I. 7.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 27 two chief divisions of spiritual life, the active being Hugo Vic- typified by the feeding of the Bridegroom, and the HgJJJ.' contemplative by His rest. At noon, too, because Harphius. there are three hours of contemplation. The first is thought, like the early morning, having but little ra- diance or heat. Of this is written, " Early in the Ps. v. 3. morning I will direct my prayer unto Thee, and will look up." The second period is meditation, like the third hour, when the sun begins to get high, and to glow. Whence the Psalm, "While I was thus mus- Ps.xxxix.4. ing the fire kindled." The third time is foretaste, like the noon-day, " when it parcheth the country." This, EccIus. the true fervour of contemplation, is the place where ^"^- ^• the Beloved resteth at noon-day. " O place of true repose, not unfitting the name of bed, where God is ^^^^ seen, not in His wrath, nor as though wrapped in His providential love, but as a Will altogether merciful, loving, and perfect. This vision affrights not, but soothes ; calms all anxious restlessness ; arouses not, wearies not, but tranquillizes. The tranquillity of God makes all things tranquil, and to look upon His rest, is rest itself." Another most striking interpre- tation is that of Irimbert, who sees in the rest, the irimbert. descent of Christ into the grave, when He made the place of darkness bright with the glorious rays of His Divinity, and fed the hungering flock of Patriarchs which iiad waited so long in Hades for the coming of its Shepherd, till — Lumen clarum tenebrarum S. Pet. Ven. Sedibus resplenduit. S,r "/"""' Splendour lighted the benighted portis. Seats of darkness with its ray. And Cardinal Hugo, with scarcely less beauty, applies Hugo Card, the words to that noonday of the Church, when the Pentecostal fires descended on the Apostles, enlight- ening them with all the radiance of the Holy Ghost, after the night of the Passion, the dawn of the Eesur- rection, and the first warmth of the Ascension had all passed over the young Bride of Cheist. Lastly, we may take the question to be that of the Church Mili- tant, feeling that her portion here, though sweet, is in- sufficient for her cravings, and desiring the full fruition of Cheist in that Land Where no cloud nor passing vapour j^^mS"' Dims the brightness of the air, luminosa. Gen. xxxii. 30 28 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 7. Endless noonday, glorious noonday, From the Sun of suns is there, There no night brings rest from labour, All unknown are toil and care. Serm. 33. And on this let us hear S. Bernard: "O true noon- day, fulness of glow and light, abiding of the sun, dis- peller of shades, drier up of marshes, ejector of evil odours ! O perennial solstice, when the day shall no more go down ! O noontide glory ! O vernal mild- ness ! O summer beauty ! O autumnal plenty, and lest aught should be lacking to my tale, O rest and festival of winter ! Or, if thou wouldst rather have it so, winter alone is over and gone. Show me, says the Bride, the place of such love and peace, and fulness, that as Jacob, yet abiding in the flesh, saw God face to face, and his life was spared, so I too may look on Thee in Thy light and glory, by contemplation in trance of soul, as Thou feedest more abundantly, and restest more securely. For here too Thou feedest, but not in security, nor canst Thou rest, but Thou must needs stand and watch, because of the terrors of the night. Alas ! here is no clear light, nor full refreshment, nor safe dwelling, and therefore tell me where Thou feed- est, where Thou restest at noon. Thou callest me blessed when I hunger and thirst after righteousness. What is that to their happiness who are filled with the good things of Thy house, who feast and rejoice before God, and are merry and joyful ? When wilt Thou fill me with joy with Thy countenance ? Thy Face, Loed, will I seek. Thy Face is the noon. Tell me where Thou feedest, where Thou restest at noon. I know well where Thou feedest, but restest not, tell me where Thou dost both rest and feed." There will be, even in the noonday radiance of Heaven, cool waters and Ps. xxiii. 2. green pastures for the flock of the Good Shepherd, and so the type of heathen poetry shall be fulfilled : Virgil. Et jam compellente vagaj pastore capellae Culex, 103. Ima susurrantis repetebant ad vada lymphse. Quae subter viridem residebant cterula museum. Jam medias operum partes evectus erat sol, Quum densas pastor pecudes cogebat in umbras. The roaming she-goats, at their herdsman's will, Eesought the low fords of the whispering stream. Which rested blue beneath the verdant moss. And now the sun had reached his midmost toils, "When to the thick shade drove the swain his flock. I. 7.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 29 For ivhy should I he as one that turneth aside hy the flocks of Thy companions ? This is the reason, say they all, assigned by the Bride for her question. It is not merely for herself, that she may find her Beloved, that she asks Him to tell her His abiding-place, but for His sake to6, lest He should lose her. And they agree in the main, also, to interpret the second clause of bodies other than the One Church, but bearing a spe- cious resemblance to it. Turneth aside. The Vulgate reads. Lest I begin to wander. Tlie LXX., agreeing with the margin of A.V., and with most modern critics, has As one that is ivrajpjped tip, or veiled.'^ Of this there are various expositions. First and most pro- bably, we may take it of the customary veiling of har- Gen.xxxviu. lots. Why should I, the Virgin Bride, by wandering vatabius. near other shepherds than Thee, appear as though a shameless courtezan ? Again, it may be. Why should I, who look on Thee face to face, and have felt Thy oriffen. kiss, be compelled to veil myself in modest bashful- s. Hieron, ness, lest any eyes save Thine should see me? ifadEustoch. Thou tell me where Thou restest, I can come at once to Thee, unveiled, but if Thou tell me not, I must needs cover my face while I am seeking Thee among strangers. Or, why should I, missing Thee, be forced Com. a Lap. to put on the garments of mourning, and appear as a widow instead of a bride ? Origen, who gives various origen. explanations of the passage, remarks that several of the philosophical schools and sects assumed the title of Veiled, implying thereby their possession of hidden truth, and that the Church here beseeches that she may know and teach the truth openly, so as not to appear like one of them ; nor, adds S. Augustine in the same sense, like the obscure and localized com- Ip'^adVhi- munities of heretics. And last, we may take veiled as cent. 48. practically coming to the same thing as the wandering ^- ^^^z- of the Vulgate, understanding it to mean putting on cass^od. the walking-dress of the East over the attire worn s. Bernard, within doors. Thy companions. Origen says that the origen. companions of Cheist are the Angels placed in charge of the various Gentile nations of the earth, those 1 The root rrp^, texit.^ whence 7TTC5?, the word in the original, is derived, includes the idea of circular motion, as a garment is wrapped about the person, and thence may be transferred to the notion of wandering round and round a place. Hence Symmachus translates, in this sense, ws pe/A)3o^tVr/. 30 A COMMENTARY ON [1.8. S. John X. 16. Theodoret. S. Just. Org Cassiod. S. August, de Verb. Dom. 50. Aponius. 2 Tim.iii.5, S. Greg. M, Rupert. Irimbert. " other sheep" which are not yet of Christ's fold. But the great majority of commentators see in the flocks of the companions the sects of heretical Chris- tians. They are called Christ's companions, though ■ they are not His friends, because they assume the Christian name, and profess to teach the same truths as the Church, and promise the like blessings. And as compariions is the special Eastern title for those who feast at the same table, so these profess to feed their disciples with the same banquet of Sacraments and Holy Writ, though they poison it by perverting its sense, " having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof." S. Gregory extends the application of the words to all false brethren, all evil Christians, who are in a sense Christ's companions, as having a place in His Church and a share in His Sacraments, i but are not truly His elect. Eupert stands alone in I seeing here a reference to the Scribes and Pharisees, and therefore a petition of the Church to be guarded from Judaizing. Another, not very dissimilarly, applies the passage to the Patriarchs and Prophets of the Old Testament, companions indeed of Christ, as loving and following Him as far as they knew, but still wander- ing uncertainly, and with no clear noontide revelation. S. Bernard takes the words, very singularly, of the evil spirits, transforming themselves into angels of light, and pretending to be Christ's servants and friends in order to deceive the soul which seeks Him. 8 If thou know not^ O thou fairest among women, go thy way forth by the footsteps of the flock, and feed thy kids beside the shep- herds' tents. If thoit know not. The simple meaning of these words has been obscured by the LXX. and Vulgate, which endeavour to reproduce the pleonastic Hebrew idiom, and read If thou knoioest not thyself, and nearly all the ancient commentators have interpreted this of self-ignorance. And thus S. Justus of Urgel, taking the words in close connection with those that follow, observes, that Christ thus addresses the Church, If ^^' thou know not that thou axi fairest amongst all Chris- tian bodies, since all except thee have lost their purity, then go forth to seek Me ; but if thou truly knowest what thou art, and with what grace I have dowered S. Athanas. Philo Carp. I. 8.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 31 \^hee, then look within thyself, and thou wilt find Me ^^.'there. S. Bernard, also taking the words as those of s. Bernard. ,^ gie Bridegroom, interprets them in a far sterner sense, serm.38. kb-, . rebuke to the Bride who, ignorant that she is yet •but in the body, and merely fairest amonff women, (that 's, amongst secular and carnal souls, having no true ■ vigour or constancy,) yet dares to ask God to show her the place of His glory. She is therefore recalled to herself, and convinced of her ignorance, and chastised for her boldness, and to teach her humility, she is com- manded to go forth out of the sanctuary of her heart, away from holy contemplation, and to busy herself again in the lower service of external cares. And not s. Hieron. dissimilarly S. Jerome, addressing the Abbess S. Eus- ^p^^*^' ^^' tochium, explains the passage, " Though thou be fair, and thy beauty be loved by Me thy Bridegroom more than that of all other women, yet, unless thou know thyself, and keep thy heart with all watchfulness, un- less thou fly from the glances of youth, thou shalt go forth from My chamber to feed the goats, which are to stand on My left." Yes, adds S. Augustine, carry- ing on the same argument, to feed them not as Peter ^^^' ^om^ feeds My sheep, not to be in My fold. Who am the cf.Origen. One Shepherd, but by the tents of other shepherds, not of unity but of division. A second view puts the words into the mouths of the Bride's virgin friends, as though of encouragement to her, lest she should be too I much cast down with thoughts of her marred beauty, s. Greg. I and not knowing herself to be fairest, doubt of re- Nyss. taining her Spouse's love. Si/ the footsteps of the flocTc. That is, observes one, follow up all the traces Theodoret. of those Saints of the Old Covenant who belonged m faith to the New, lead on, and feed thy kids, thy weak and sinful members, by the te7its of the shep- herds, the Churches of the Apostles, that there they may be healed. And this is, in fact, the Christian view of the old Jewish gloss, which says here, " The Targum. Holy and Blessed One spake to Moses the Prophet : Thou askest that their exile may be ended. Let the synagogue, which is compared to a most beautiful •virgin, and whom My soul loveth, walk in the paths of the just, and direct its prayer in the mouths of its rulers, and lead its generations and lead its sons, (who are compared to kids of the goats,) to walk in the house of the congregation, and in the house of doctrine, and because of that good deed they shall be supported 32 A COMMENTARY ON [1.9 Aponius. Parez. Beda. S.Brun.Ast. Cassiod. S. John xxi. 16. Dion. Carth, S. Ambros. de Isaac et Anim. 4. Numb, xxiv, 5. 1 Kings X. 28. 2 Chron. ix. 28. Theodoret. S. Ambros. Serm. 2, in Ps. cxix. Id. de Isaac. 4. Tres Patr. Philo Carp. in their captivity, till I send them Messiah the Kin^'Pig Who shall lead them into rest to their own tabernac' j. which is that House of Sanctuary which David ^^j^^ Solomon, Shepherds of Israel, shall build for ^ Aponius, too, takes the words as spoken by Cheist ^^ the Synagogue, urging her to come to the knowled^ - f\ of the truth. The common view sees in the Jlock ' ■> kids, and shej^lierds, the heretical, sinful, and schis matic companionship into which a Church or a soul which does not strive after self-knowledge is certain to fall. There is not wanting, however, a nobler and more cheering interpretation, which is, in fact, the truest meaning of the passage. When the Loed asked Peter, "Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou Me?" and was answered, "Loed, Thou knowest that I love Thee;" His further speech was, " Feed My sheep." So, the way for the Church or the soul to find Cheist is to go forth from herself, to follow the traces of the straying flocks, to feed more especially the kids, weak and sinful servants of His, and so to reach the tents of the shepherds, the wise and holy teachers to whom He intrusts His sheep. And again, the kids may well denote the petulant and unrestrained desires of the heart, which need to be checked, ruled, and fed, not in the tabernacles of the body, but in those of the spirit, whereof is written, " How goodly are thy tents, O Jacob, and thy tabernacles, O Israel." 9 I have compared thee, O my love, to a company of horses in Pharaoh's chariots. The obvious reference here is to the Egyptian breed of horses, chiefly esteemed in Solomon's time, as we read in Scripture ; and the Church, or the faithful soul, is compared to a gallant steed, first, because of the swiftness of her running after Cheist ; next, be- cause of her ready obedience and submission to His , yoke ; thirdly, because of her bearing the Gospel chariot into all lands ; and lastly, because of her fruitfulness , bringing forth young abundantly by preaching. Anc I much in this same sense the Greek Fathers understand it, explaining, as they do, that Cheist compares the Gentile Church, in its zeal and holiness, to His great steeds the Apostles, who drew Him in Pharaoh's chariots, that is, amongst all the nations of the earth. And so a Saint has said, " Those swift-limbed steeds, 9-] THE SONG OF SONGS. 33 b.He Apostles, from Sion as from tlieir starting-point, j?- J'^'^sos. ■ ^t forth into the whole world." "■a '^ Guider of Thy chariot fleet, mount, Lord, these steeds of fire, The Se- V "^nd make a pathway for their feet through our hearts' deepest quence.iZeg-- ' •rv,;,.^ . num tuum. mire; iThat we, borne safely in this car from out the troubled sea, Hab. iii. I5. May reach our country's haven far, and ever dwell with Thee. Origen, dwelling on the word PharaoJi as the Scrip- Origen. tural type of evil, comments thus : " As in Egypt, when Pharaoh, pursuing after the children of Israel, went forth with horses and chariots. My (LXX. and Vulg.) chivalry far surpassed and excelled Pharaoh's chariots, in that it overcame them and drowned them in the sea, so thou. My Love and Bride, excellest all women, and art made like to My chivalry, which, compared with the chariots of Pharaoh, proved stronger and more glorious." He further proceeds to remind us what that chivalry of God is, by citing the vision at Dothan, when Elisha's servant saw the " mountain 2 Kings vi. full of horses and chariots of fire round about." And ^''• thus the sense would be, I have matched thee against ^* ^^''"^'^d- the horses and chariots of Pharaoh. I have set thee, Aponius. My Church, to war against the chief priests and scribes who denied Me. I have set thee to fight against all the darkness and idolatry of the spiritual Egypt. Others would turn it, I have likened thee, who wast once in Pharaoh's chariots, in bondage and misery, to My own chivalry, for I have brought thee through the Beda. Sed Sea of Baptism, and made thee clean and free. A Haymo. yet deeper mystical sense, seeing in the white horse of the Apocalypse, on which He Who is Faithful and J^^ Yn ^^^g- True rides, the Manhood of Cheist bearing His God- xix, ^ head as Its Ruler, — finds here the manner in which Cheist makes His Bride like Himself, in that He Theodoret. "will change our vile Body that it maybe like unto Phiiip.iii.21. His glorious Body." And this He will do, when He irimbert. makes us go up, as He did, " with a merry noise, and ps. xivii.5. the sound of the trump;" when we are "caught up 1 Thess. iv. to meet our Loed in the air;" caught up, as Elijah ^7-. was, by the fiery " chariot of Israel and the horsemen 12. '"^^ "" thereof;" which are those cherubim on which He rides, Ps. xviii. lo. " ministering spirits sent forth to minister for them Heb. i. 14. also, who shall be heirs of salvation ;" horses terrible to Pharaoh's chariots in the battles of the soul, going on jq^ xxxix. to meet the armed men, mocking at fear, and turning 21. D 34 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 10. S. Thom. k Villanov. S. Bernard. Serm. 39. Exod. xiv. 25. Ps. cxi. 10. Zech. X. 3. Prov. i. ' not back from the sword. Yet another view is that God makes His Saints like His chivalry the Angels, even while He suffers them to be driven by Pharaoh in his chariot ; that is to say, that He gives them grace whereby they lead a life of angelic purity and holiness even while in the prison of the flesh, and sorely tried by temptations of the evil one. " And you will not marvel," adds S. Bernard, "that one soul is here compared not to one horse only, but to a company/ of horses, if you remark how many armies of virtues there are in a single soul which is holy, what orderly array in affections, what discipline in habits, what equipment in prayer, what vigour in action, what dreadfulness in resolution, what steadiness in fight, what aggregate of triumphs." That matching against Pharaoh is no light struggle, as the Saint goes on to say : " There Israel is brought out of Egypt, here man out of the world, there Pharaoh is routed, here the evil one ; there Pharaoh's chariots are over- whelmed, here the carnal and secular desires which war against the soul ; those went down in waves, these in weepings. And I believe that now the demons, if they encounter such a soul, cry out, ' Let us flee from the face of Israel, for the Loed fighteth for him.' " 10 Thy cheeks are comely with rows of jewels, thy neck with chains of gold. This rendering is sufficiently close to the Hebrew text, save that the word " pearls " might perhaps be well substituted for " gold." The simile of the horse continues, and now the costly trappings with which the swift and docile steed is decked are described. First comes the headstall, to which the bit and bridle are at- tached, and this is said to be made with roivs 0^*1111 torim, a word akin to Torah, the Law, and denoting orderly arrangement. Thus, the first adornments of the Church of God are the precepts and statutes by which He guides lier, because "the fear of the Loed is the beginning of wisdom," and when " the Loed of Hosts hath visited His flock, and hath made them as His goodly horse in the battle," He adorns the neck which bears His yoke with those additional instruc- tions of which is written in another place, " They shall be an ornament of grace unto thine head, and chains about thy neck." So too the Targum explains it; I. 10.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 35 and we liare in Ezekiel a fuller enumeration of this adorning : " I decked thee with ornaments, and I put Ezek. xvi. bracelets upon thine hands, and a chain on thy neck: ^^^ and I put a jewel on thy forehead, and earrings in thine ears, and a beautiful crown upon thine head : thus wast thou decked with gold and silver." But the LXX., Arabic, and Vulgate, taking the word torim in its frequent sense of turtle-doves, translate here. Thy cheeTcs are comely as those of a turtle. The words are spoken by the Bridegroom, says Origen, to comfort Origen. the Bride, deeply blushing at the rebuke she has just Theodoret received. And he explains the cheeks, as the seat of modesty, to be those members of the Church who |; Bernard.' are eminent for purity and shamefastness. They are Rupert, &c. cheeks of a dove, because of the faithfulness of those birds to one another when they have paired ; and so the Church keeps herself faithful to her one Beloved, and mourns for Him when He is absent from her. Of a dove, says another, because Cheist is Himself that Dove, and those Doctors of the Church who are emi- Aponius. nent for holiness, are her cheeTcs, and are like Him. Again, they lay stress on the well known habit of the turtle-dove of dwelling in retired and shady places, to point out the need of solitary retirement for the holy soul. And thus S. Bernard : " It is far above one's serm. 40. own power to be plighted to the Loed of Angels. Is it not beyond thee to cling to God, and to be one spirit with Him "^ Sit then solitary like the turtle, have nothing to do with crowds and multitudes, forget also thine own people and thy father's house, so shall the King have pleasure in thy beauty. . . . With- draw, then, but in soul, in resolve, in devotion, in spirit, not in body." The unvarying note of the turtle suggests to the Greek Fathers the grave and Tres Patr. steadfast discourse of true Christians, as distinguished from the frivolous loquacity of the heathen world. And others dwell on its mournful sound, as typifying Nic. Argent, the tears of pity and intercession flowing down from the contemplative Saints, called the cheeks of the \-.hurch, because close to the eyes, which are the en- lightening gifts of the Holy Spieit. Thy neck as collars. If of " pearl," as suggested above, then the points of likeness will be three, roundness, whiteness, and orderly arrangement, typifying the Heligious Life, round, in the vow of poverty, because as a sphere touches other bodies at one point only, so the profes- D 2 36 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 11. Theodoret. S. Hieron.in Esaiam. Tres Patr. S. Ambros. in Ps. cxix . Cassiod. Beda S.Ans.Laud. S. Greg. M. Tres Patr. S. Clem. Alex. Paedag.iii. 1. Juv. Sat. xvi. 59. Targum. Gen. i. 26. Irimbert. sion of poverty detaches Eeligious almost completely from earthly things ; white, in the profession of chas- tity ; and regular, in the pledge of obedience to rule. The flexibility of the neck too, as also denoting obe- dience, has been dwelt on by several expositors, and, as some add, it is therefore said, " as a necklace," be- cause of the pliancy of that ornament. And, S. Am- brose observes, the law of God is not a bond or a yoke upon the obedient neck, but a collar, which even dumb animals take pride in wearing. Most early commentators, however, explain the necTc to mean the chief Doctors and preachers of the Church, because, as the throat is the passage for food from the head to the stomach, and is also the channel of speech, so they communicate the doctrine of Cheist to the people, and utter it in their discourse. S. Anselm of Laon adds an- other reason, that they are the link of union between Cheist the Head, and the faithful laity of His Body. And as a necklace goes all round the neck, so true obedience embraces all the actions of the Christian life, especially amongst Eeligious. Again, as necklaces are made of jewels set in gold, so the true adornments of Saints are good works undertaken in wisdom. Once more, as jewelled collars are made of many separate parts, all united in one flexible band, so the decoration of the Bride of Cheist is made up of many virtues, twined with humility. And it is not to be forgotten that in ancient da^^s the jewelled necklace was not merely the ornament of virgins (wherefore a Saint says, addressing women, "Let your collar and chains be modesty and shamefastness,") but also the especial prize of conspicuous valour, lit qui fortis erit sit felicissimus idem, Ut laeti phaleris omnes et torquibus omnes. That whoso valiant is in fight, the same may richest be, And all be glad with costly gauds and collars fair to see. 11 We will make thee borders of gold with studs of silver. We icill maJce. First they ask. Who are these that speak ? And the answer of the Targum is the best, that it is the same Who said in the beginning, " Let us make man in our image ;" to wit, the Most Holy Trinity, Fathee, Son, and Holt Ghost. The Chaldee para- phrast thus continues, " Then was it said unto Moses, I. 11.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 37 Get thee up into the mount, and I will give thee two tables of stone, cut from the sapphire throne of My glory, shining as the finest gold, ruled with lines traced by My finger, wherein are written ten sayings, purified more than silver which has been purified seven times, and I will give them by thy hand to the people of the house of Israel." But this sense, beau- tiful as it is, refers to the past, long before the time of the Canticles. It is not We have made, but We will make, and is therefore a promise to the Bride of some good things she has not yet obtained. So then we may compare the similar promise in another place : " Though ye have lien among the pots, yet shall ye be Ps.lxviii. 13 as the wings of a dove, that is covered with silver wings, and her feathers like gold," and are led on from the harsh, stern dictates of the Law to the grace and truth of the Gospel, according to that saying of Ainsworth. the Prophet, " For brass I will bring gold, and for isa. ix. 17. iron I will bring silver." We may see here in the word border, a reference to Him Who standeth " round pg. cxxv. 2. about His people for evermore," and then, as it is written, " A word fitly spoken is as apples of gold in pictures of silver," the gold may denote the Godhead of the WoED, the pictures or studs of silver the pure Manhood of Chkist. Several of the Fathers agree s. August, with the general spirit of the Chaldee interpretation, ^' ^J^^' and take the golden borders to denote the knowledge Theodoret. of Holy Scripture, intertwined with silver threads of Aponius. types, prophecies, counsels, and the like, or even with the human eloquence of devout preachers ; silver, as pure and holy, but not golden with direct inspiration. They vary, however, in attributing the words to the Bridegroom or to His friends. Origen, taking the q^. ^^ latter view, and following the LXX. rendering, which "^®"' is similitudes of gold with spots of silver, }ioidi& ^^^^^q^^^^'q the speakers are the Angels, who ordained the Law in oai. m. 19. the hand of a Mediator, and the Prophets who ex- pound that Law. While the King is in Sis lying down, and has not yet come to deck His Bride Him- self, they desire to do something for her adornment. They have no gold, because of "the Law having aHeb. x. i. shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things," and therefore they can give only similitudes of gold, the Ark of the Covenant, the altar of incense, the shew-bread, and the like, mere types of future mysteries. They have silver, the 38 A COMMENTARY ON [1.11. 2 Chron. i. 15. S. Ambros. Psellus. Philo Carp. Gal. vi. 17. S. Greg. M. Cassiodor. S. Bruno Ast. Dion. Carth Parez, moral precepts and counsels to guide man's life, but only in very small quantity, so that they can bestow merely spots of it, unlike the true Solomon, of whom it is written, " And the king made silver and gold at Jeru- salem as plenteous as stones." Others, agreeing with Origen in taking the clause While the King is in His lying doton with the present sentence, explain it of the current dispensation, to end when He arises to judgment, and they interpret the similitudes of gold and the spots of silver to be the imperfect foretaste of eternal joys granted to the Church Militant on earth. Again, they take the golden ornaments to signify the cleansing of the Church by fiery persecutions, and in this sense one commentator declares that the Martyrs are the golden jewels of the Church, marked with silver spots denoting the torments and sufferings they endured, as the Apostle writes, " I bear about in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." The Vulgate rendering, nechlets {murenulas, literally, little eels, named from their flexibility and cylindrical form) damascened {vermiculatas) with silver, has given rise to much comment from the Latin Fathers. Thus S. Gregory observes, "The eel is a fish which, when taken, twists itself into a circle, in resemblance of which an ear-ring is made, called muremda, by which is de- noted preaching, which hangs to the ears, and enters them. Collars {monilia) are fastened to the neck with muremilcB, just as wisdom and religion are united by preachers with Holy Writ. For by these necklets we understand Holy Writ to be meant. It is well said to be damascened with gold and silver, because it shines with wisdom, and is heard, by clear preaching, throughout the world." Another Saint, looking to the twinings of the eel, says that the golden necklets de- note the more involved and difficult sayings and doc- trines of Scriptures, and the silver threadings the ex- positions of the Saints thereon. Not very dissimilarly, another holy writer sees in the gold the contemplation of Divine mysteries, and in the silver the created chan- nels through which we are here obliged to make that contemplation. Or, as yet another puts it, the gold is Christ's benefits of love : the silver, the good works and wisdom with which we carry them out. After these explanations, that of Parez seems poor, who takes the golden necklaces to be the spiritual graces of the Church, the silver threadings her temporal endow- I. 12.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 39 ments. Lastly, S. Jerome says that gold denotes tlie Virgin life. Before Cheist came, the Church had the silver of chaste marriage and widowhood, but the S. Hieron, more precious metal of virginity was His gift. And j°°*' -^o^"^- the words therefore point to that especial aureole re- served for maiden brows. They say, who know the life divine, Keble And upward gaze with eagle eyne, Christian That by each golden crown on high, Year. Rich with celestial jewelry, Which for our Lord's redeemed is set. There hangs a radiant coronet, All gemmed with pure and living light. Too dazzling for a sinner's sight, Prepared for virgin souls, and them "Who seek the Martyr's diadem. 12 While the king sitteth at his table^ my spikenard sendeth forth the smell thereof. They assign four principal meanings to this sitting s. Aug. de of the King, or rather, following the original idiom, J^^^- ^- ^• and that of the ancient versions. His lying down. ' ^^^' ' First ; it is taken of the repose of Christ's Godhead in heaven. " The lying-down of the King is the s. Bernard. Bosom of the Father, for the Son is ever in the Fa- ^^^^- '^^^ THER. And thou canst not doubt Him to be a merciful King, whose everlasting down-lying is the dwelling of the Father's lovingkindness. Fitly does the cry of the lowly ascend to Him, Who is the fount and habi- tation of gentleness." And this is the sense in which Origen and those other Fathers who attach the words Ori&en. to the previous verse understand them, taking, as they do, the Incarnation of Christ to be His standing zip to help mankind in the battle. But others will have it Cassiodor. that the Incarnation itself is here meant, called lying ^^^^: down because of the humility with which the Lord p°^"®' emptied Himself of His glory. Thirdly ; the Passion s. Just. Org. and Death of Christ, His lying down on the Cross and ^iitodo^ret."^' in the grave, is the view of more than one Saint and s. Greg. Father. And lastly ; there is the indwelling of Christ ^^^^p ^ in the holy soul. They vary also as to the meaning of the spikenard. The older interpretation explains it of Christ Himself, " It is no marvel," says Origen, " if Origen. Christ, as He is the Fountain, and streams of living water proceed out of Him ; and as He is the Bread, and Theodoret. gives life; so He is the Spikenard also, and gives odour, 40 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 12. Heb. V. 14. Serm. 42. Rupert. Parez. Dion. Carth Philipp. Harveng. and is the ointment wherewith those who are anointed become Christs, as He saith in the Psalm, 'Touch not My Christs.' And it maybe that as the Apostle saith, unto ' those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil,' Cheist adapts Himself for each of the soul's senses. There- fore He is called the True Light, that the soul's eyes may have illumination ; therefore He is the Woed, that the ears may hearken ; therefore He is the Bread of Life, that the soul's taste may perceive savour. Therefore also He is called spikenard or ointment, that the soul's sense of smell may receive the fragrance of the WoED. Therefore, too. He can be touched and handled with the hand, and the Woed was made flesh, that the hands of the inner soul might handle the Word of Life." Next ; the spikenard will denote the lowliness of the Church, or of the soul which draws near God. " Good," exclaims S. Bernard, " is that odour of humility which, ascending from the vale of tears, and impregnating all the regions round about, perfumes with grateful sweetness the royal chamber itself. The spikenard is a lowly plant, which they who have carefully studied the properties of herbs state to be of a warm nature, and thus I hold it not unsuitable to understand here that virtue of humility which is hot with the exhalations of holy love." And if it be true of all humble saints, whether of the Old or New Cove- nant, as they allege, much more is it so of her, the holiest and most exalted of all, in whose hallowed womb the King vouchsafed to lie down. " The King Him- self," says a saintly writer, venturing, with holy bold- ness, to put words into the pure mouth of the Mother of God, " Son of the Most Highest King, Himself of no lesser dignity, from His equal throne with the Fa- THEE, from His royal seat, from the secret dwelling of His unapproachable Majesty, where the Angels see and desire His Face evermore, vouchsafed to come hither to earth for the salvation of perishing souls, and rested in my chamber. In my womb, I say, that King gladly laid Himself down, and found nought in me to make His dwelling displeasing to Him. And there lying, He filled me marvellously with His grace : While preserving my virginity. He took away my maiden barrenness, and His forceful fire consumed me as a whole burnt-offering, and filled the entire house with the most fragrant perfume of ointment." I. 12.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 41 Only her spacious soul, the blessed Sea, j, Beau- Where all those floods of precious things did meet, mont, Knew what it comprehended ; Glorious, she Psyche, vii. Did taste the relish of each mystic sweet 98. In one miraculous instant, and did try The various dainties of Divinity. And so, too, it was not till He came in the flesh, that the sweet odour of the Church went up to God, filling His house, the earth, and no longer shut up in the narrow casket of Judea. Thirdly ; they explain the spikenard of repentance, and here, most naturally, that origen, other Mary, who anointed the feet of Jesus with oint- Beda. ment of spikenard, very precious, when her King sat ■'^P"^^"^- at table, is taken as the type of all true penitent souls. In praedulci unctione, The Hymn, Nardum ferens pisticum, Pange, Et unguenti fusione lingua, Typum gessit mysticum, Magdalena. Ut sanetur unctione, Unxit aegra Modicum. She, in that anointing sweetest, Bearing spikenard rich and pure. In its pouring-out completest, Showed us mystic types and sure, Sick, she gave that Healer meetest What she sought herself for cure. l^ext ; it is taken to denote the faith of the Church s. Ambros. in her Incarnate, suffering, and risen Lord, and her J" ps. cxix. preaching of that faith till its perfume filled the world. ^" ^^^^' ^^^' Fifthly ; it is explained of all good works, especially of prayer. And following this view in connection with cassiodor that which sees in the lying doivn, the Passion and Beda. Burial of Cheist, we may remember not only the spices with which the Sacred Body was interred, but also those which the holy women brought to the sepul- chre, deeming Him to be still there, and may take upon our lips those words of the Holy Eastern Church : Let us rise in early morning, S. Johann. And instead of ointments, bring Damasc. Hymns of praise unto our Master, ^^^ Golden And His Resurrection sing, Canon. We shall see the Sun of Justice Risen with healing in His wing. And this especially when we approach the sacred Banquet wherein the King indeed sitteth at His table, to feed His guests with His own most precious Body 42 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 13. S. Greg. M. Theodoret. Honor. Aug. Origen. S. Ambros. inPs. cxix. S. Greg. Nyss. Origen. 2 S. Pet. i. 20. Aponius. Cassiodor. S. Greg. M. Prudent. Cathera. x. 51. S. Johnxix. and Blood. We greet Him, however, not only in His glorious Eesurrection, but in His wonderful Ascension, so that the odour of our petitions and holy deeds may be wafted upwards to His feet as He sits on the great white throne. When the fires of Pentecost came down after Chkist went up and entered His chamber once more, then the words of salvation and the holy ex- amples of the Saints of God sent their fragrance over all the earth, because the incense was kindled by the flame of the Spieit. 13 A bundle of myrrh is my wellbeloved unto me ; he shall lie all night betwixt my breasts. As we had in the spilcenard the Incarnation of Cheist, so here we have His Passion set before us in the myrrh. And observe, this myrrh is not loose, but in a bundle, tied up. First then, Cheist is a bundle for us, because He was not content to be with us in the Omnipresence of His Godhead, but came to us also bound in human form, and with like passions to ours. He is a bundle, again, because He ties Himself to our souls with the cords of His most tender and unfailing love. And thirdly ; because each group of Cheist's sayings, and each doctrine or miracle of His, is bound up with others, with the cord of truth, and cannot be taken separately. And this is what the Apostle means when he says that " no prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation." Next ; the bundle is of myrrh, because that bitter herb typifies the suffering and death of Cheist, and also the share in that suf- fering which must be the lot of all who follow Him. Myrrh, they remind us, was used in the burial of the dead, to preserve the body from corruption. Aspersaque myrrha Sabseo Corpus medicamine servat. And myrrh which is sprinkled preserveth With unguent of Saba the body. And therefore the Church, mindful not only of the mixture of myrrh and aloes which Nicodemus brought for the burial of the Loed, but of her own preservation from the rottenness of sin by His dying, dwells in thankful love on the story of His Passion. He shall lie all night. The words all night are not necessarily implied in the Hebrew, nor are they expressed in the I. 13.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 43 old versions, but tlie verb Vy^ lun here used, so often has this sense/ that we need not hesitate to apply their mystical import. All night, then, in all time of our tribulation, in every sorrow, and throughout the dark- ness of this world, till the day break, Christ shall be with us, closest and dearest. Betwixt my breasts. And that because He is 3Iy Well-beloved. "Just now," says S. Bernard, "He was King, now He is Well- s. Bernard, beloved. Just now, He was in His lying down, now ^^^^- *^- betwixt the breasts of His spouse. Great is the might of humility, to which the majesty of Godhead so readily bows itself. The name of reverence is quickly changed into that of love, and He Who was far off, speedily is near. A bundle of myrrh is my Well-beloved unto me. Myrrh is a bitter thing, harsh and rough ; it denotes tribulation. She, knowing that it awaits her for her Beloved's sake, utters that saying thank- fully, trusting that she can valiantly bear it all. ' The Acts v. 4i. disciples departed,' she says, ' from the presence of the Council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His Name.' " Betioixt my breasts. The metaphor is taken from the Eastern custom of carrying a small posy or bag of myrrh in the bosom, to scent the clothes, and also as a safeguard against Cassiodor. infection, and thence it is fitly transferred to them who keep in their heart the memory of Cheist's death. My breasts. Of the Church, the Old and New Testa- ments, one with its prophecies and types of the Passion, the other with the history and the results of it, between Phiio Carp, which lies the scarred form of the Man of Sorrows. My breasts, of the holy soul, which carries Christ be- tween the two great commandments, the love of God g gt&s. m. and the love of one's neighbour. A bundle of myrrh betwixt the breasts of His most dear Mother, in His Incarnation, because He preserved her then pure from Parez. all taint of her virginity ; and again in the hour of His Passion, when the sword passed through her bosom, Rupert, and she tasted the bitterness of death with Him. And it is because of all these reasons that it has been the ^^°"- c^^^^^^- delight of Christians for many centuries, and especially of those Virgin souls which are dedicated to their Lord, of whom it is written, T , , , . . ,. Godeschal- In earum pectore cubat in mendie, cus. The Inter mammas virginum collocans cubiculum ; Sequence, Virgines 1 Gen. xix. 2 ; Judg. xix. 6, 9; Ruthiii. 13 ; Job xxix. 19, &c. cas*«- 44 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 14. He lieth on their bosom in the noontide, Making His couch betwixt the breasts of the virgins ; to wear the crucifix upon their breasts in memory of their suffering Bridegroom. 14 My beloved is unto me as a cluster of camphire in the vineyards of En-gedi. Dion. Garth. And now we have the E-esurrection. There is no doubt as to the plant intended here, which is the famous henna of the East, worn by the women in posies on their breasts, because of its beautiful and fragrant blossoms, and employed as a dye to give the favourite golden red tinge to their nails. And the word "l^-^ Com. k Lap. copher, here read in the Hebrew, means also expiation or ransom, so that we have here a confession from the Thrupp. Bride of the preciousness and fragrance of that Re- demption wrought for her, which makes the traces of Christ's Passion appear even in her humblest mem- bers. This camphire can be gathered only in the vine- yards, where the wine of the Passion is produced, vineyards truly of En-gedi, the " fountain of the kid," Cassiodor. because when the mingled tide flowed from the spear Phiio Carp, wound On the Cross, then the prophecy was fulfilled, s" Bernard' " ^^ *^^^ ^^^ there shall be a fountain opened to the Zech. xiu. i. house of David and to the inhabitants of Jerusalem for sin and for uncleanness," and the waters of Baptism were provided to wash away our guilt. En-gedi now, be- cause of the clear sweet waters of the Gospel, but once Gen. xiv. 7. Hazazon-Tamar, the " pruning of the palm," by reason 2 Chron. xx. of the stern precepts of the Law, cutting off, rather than ^' cleansing, the sinner. An ambiguity in the LXX. and Vulgate rendering of *|D3n 722^^^^ eshcol lia-coplier, which they both turn hotrus Cypri, has led to much difficulty and variety of exposition amongst both Greek and Latin commentators. With the single exception of Origen, who rightly explains the words of a thickly flowering shrub, (though he prefers, after all, to follow the less correct rendering,) they agree in taking hotrus to mean a cluster of grapes, and the Latins, for the most part, suppose Cypri to denote the island of Cyprus, then, as now, famous for its wine, and thus merely an epithet of excellence. Others, nearer to the truth, take it to be the proper name of a halsam-tree, resembling the grape in its clusters, and therefore said to grow in vineyards. I. 14.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 45 It is not a' little curious that the error of rendering grajpe for cluster is found not only in those who followed the ambiguous rendering, but in the Chaldee Targum itself. The Greeks generally suppose Cypri to denote blooming ov flowering, from the verb Kvirpi^co, and interpret the whole phrase, a grape infloiver, i.e., before the fruit is developed. " And this," says Origen, " because those Origen. to whom the Word is the True Vine, do not find Him giving them all at once ripe and sweet grapes ; nor does He suddenly become to them that rich wine which makes glad the heart of man, but first He gives them only the pleasant odour of blossoms. This flowering grape is said to be in the vineyards of Engaddi ; that its grateful fragrance may at the very beginning be poured into the soul ; that she may afterwards endure the bitterness of trials and temptations which beset believers for the sake of the Woed of God ; and at last He gives them the sweetness of His maturity, till He brings them to the wine-presses, where is poured out the blood of the grape, the blood of the New Testa- ment, which shall be drunk on the festal day above, where the great banquet is prepared .... And in that this flowering grape is said to be of the vineyards of Engaddi : the word Engaddi is interpreted, the eye of my temptation} Any one, then, who understands how men's life on earth is a temptation, and who also knows how one is delivered in God out of temptation, and who detects the nature of his own special tempta- tion, so that it may be said of him that in all these things he hath not sinned with his li^^s before God : to such a man the Word of God becomes a flowering grape in the vineyards of Engaddi." Some of the Latin Fathers, remembering the vine- s. Ambros. bunch borne on the pole by the spies, see in the grape s.^j^tforg. of Cyprus the Crucifixion of Christ ; and in Engaddi, the Scribes and Pharisees who surrounded and tempted 1 This curious rendering may thus be accounted for : En or Ain is strictly the eye, and is merely transferred by metaphor to a pool or fountain, as an eye of the earth. Gaddi is ex- plained, "my temptation," by following the LXX. interpre- tation of Gen. xlix. 19, where read, " Gad, a temptation shall tempt him," instead of our reading, " a troop shall ovei-comehim." From the verb Tia or I'ii, properly " to press violently on," with the pi-o- nominal suffix, comes Origen's view. Another explanation, "my cutting," referred to later, comes from another sense of the same verb, "to prune," or "make an incision." 46 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 14. S. Bernard. Serm. 44. Rom.iv. 25, Aponius. S. Mat. V. 4. Corn, a Lap. Hortolanus. S. Hieron. Trad. in Gen. xiv. S. Ambros. in Ps. cxix. Beda. Him ; but the majority prefer to take it of the Resur- rection. And thus, amongst several others, S. Ber- nard : " If He be well-beloved in myrrh, much more in the sweetness of the grape-bunch. Therefore my Lord Jesus is myrrh to me in His death, a grape-bunch. in His Resurrection. He mingled Himself for me as the most healthful of drinks, in tears, in a measure. He died for our offences, and rose again for our justi- fication ; that dead unto sin, we might live unto righ- teousness. Therefore, if thou hast mourned for thy sins, thou hast drunk bitterness ; but if thou hast re- vived with holier conversation in hope of life, the bit- terness of the myrrh is changed for thee into wine, which maketh glad the heart of man." Aponius, con- trariwise, from finding here in the meaning of Cypri a reference to the funereal cypress, explains that Cheist is the grape of sorroio to sinners, when He pours the spirit of grief and comiDunction into their souls, according to His own saying, " Blessed are they that mourn, for they shall be comforted." And that in Engaddi, because it is the fount of penitential tears which washes the rank-smelling kids. Again ; if Engaddi be explained fount of my cutting, it may be taken of the precious balsam for all our hurts, flowing from the wounded side of Christ, as balm from the incisions in a tree. They are also careful to dwell on the fact that En-gedi was the place whence the choicest balsam came. And thus S. Ambrose, though explaining one word differently : " Engaddi is a place in Judaea, where opobalsam grows. If you ask its meaning, it is in Latin, temptation. In those vineyards is a tree which yields ointment if pierced, and this is the product of that tree. If it be not cut, it is not so fragrant and penetrating in odour, but when it has been skilfully pierced, it drops a tear. So Christ, crucified on that Tree of temptation, weeps over His people, to wash away our sins, and from the bowels of His mercy pours ointment upon us, saying, * Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' Then He was pierced with a spear on the Tree, and there came forth from Him blood and water, sweeter than any ointment, a victim acceptable to God, pouring the odour of sanctification throughout the world ; and as balsam from a tree, so power went forth from His Body." Beda, following up a reference of S. Gregory the Great to the use of balsam in chrism, teUs us that I. 15.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 47 the balsam denotes the graces of the Holy Spirit, and bids us note the collocation of ideas. The Bride first says, that her spikenard yielded its odour while the King was lying down, then she compares Him to a bundle of myrrh ; and thirdly, calls Him a grape-cluster of Cyprus ; declaring lastly, that He is in the vineyards of Engaddi. And that because a devout woman first anointed the Loed with spikenard when He lay down at supper. After that, the disciples wrapped in fine linen His crucified Body, anointed with myrrh for burial, and after this, He, in the joy of His Eesurrec- Philo Carp, tion, which came so soon, bestows spiritual gifts on the faithful. And it is said i7i the vineyards, denoting the Churches and faithful souls whicli rejoice in the re- demption bought for her by Cheist. Nowhere, save Aponius. in Engedi, adds another, for just as many kings tried |- Bernard, in vain to transplant the balsams of that place success- fully, so there is but the one faith wherein the Bride can find her Beloved, and the life of Cheist, outside His Church, withers away in the soul. 15 Behold, thou art fair, my love; behold, thou art fair ; thou hast doves' eyes. " This," notes Origen, " is the second address of the Ongen. Bridegroom to the Bride. In his former speech He invited her to learn to know herself, telling her that she was fairest among women, but that unless she did know herself, she should certainly undergo sufferings. And as she at once hasted in thought and understand- ing to self-knowledge. He compares her to His horses or chivalry, whereby He overcame Pharaoh's chariots. So too He compares her cheeks to turtle-doves because of her great modesty and her swiftness in action, and her neck to jewelled collars. Now, He declares her to be fair, and not as before, merely fair among women, but as near Himself,^ and lifts her to a still higher title of praise, and affirms that she is not fair merely when near to Him, but/a/r even if He be absent. For this is denoted hereby, that after saying. Behold tliou art fair, My comjDaiiion, (A. V. marg.,) He adds after this absolutely, and without any addition, Behold, thou ' The LXX. translate W!?"), my neighbour, r) irXr^aiov fiov. The root is TO^, he fed, and the primary meaning of the word is " one who eats at the same table." 48 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 15. S. Greg. Nyss. Psellus. Origen. Philo Carp. Tres. Patr. Cassiod. Beda. S. Just. Org. S. Greg. M. S. Bernard. Serm. 45. Dion. Carth, Thom. Vercell. Hugo Card. Origen. Philo Carp. Cassiod. art fairy Man, comment other Greek Fathers, is like a mirror, which appears beautiful or hideous according to the object closest to it, which it reflects, and there- fore in this life Christ's Bride can be fair only by- nearness to Him, that His countenance may shine on and in her, His companion. But in the world to come, when the Church is no longer militant, but Trium- phant, she will have perfection and beauty, not as now by imitation, but inherently of her own. Others, in- cluding some Western expositors, take the words of the double holiness in act and thought, in labour and contemplation, in body and soul, vouchsafed by Christ to His Bride. S. Gregory the Great sees here, as in the two breasts of a former verse, the love of God and of one's neighbour as the double beauty of the Church ; while S. Bernard prefers to find in the words a reference to the grace of penitence, whereby pardon, and thereby renewed beauty, has been won, and that of humility, whereby it is retained. " The repetition," says the Ec- static Doctor, " is a token of affirmation, of love, of se- riousness, and to arouse attention, as though He were saying, Thou, My Bride, My holy and elect Church, for which I gave Myself up to death, thou art fair in soul and in chastity of body. Fair by the gifts of nature, fairer by the blessings of grace. Fair within by the brightness of thy virtues, gifts, and merits : fair with- out, in thy most lovely ways. Fair in the beauty of the Sacraments, adorned with the manifold divisions of thy ministry, the varied order, station, and ranks of thy prelates, religious, and doctors, decked not only with those supernatural gifts of that grace which, maketh us graceful, but of that grace which is given freely." And that, comments another, because the first fairness is of the purgative way, which brings us to know ourselves and love God ; the other, the illumina- tive, which makes perfect, because we see God as He is. Another explanation, not without some beauty, sees here the twofold Church, Hebrew and Gentile, the first having been long God's companion, the other but lately come to Him, but both alike fair in His sight. Thou hast doves' eyes. First, they take it of the en- lightening graces of the Holy Ghost, granted to the Church and to every faithful soul. Then, of the inner vision of the soul herself, fixed on heavenly things. Doves' eyes, not only because of the Dove that came to Jordan, but as the type of meekness and purity, I. 15.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 49 and conjugal faithfulness. Thus, for the one part, Venerable Bede observes : " Christ's love has doves Beda. eyes, because every soul which truly loves Him inter- nally, is not fired, like hawks, with greed for things without, nor plans evil against any living things ; for it is said to belong to the meek nature of the dove, to look on everything that may happen with simple, gentle, and lowly heart." And for the other view, let us hear S. Gregory : " Her eyes are well said to be s. Greg.M. doves' eyes, because whilst she sighs amidst passing things, and is borne aloft to eternal longings, she guards her senses in simplicity, and abhors fleshly de- sires. For the dove, when loving, utters sighs instead of songs. Fitly, then, is the holy soul compared to a dove, for whilst the ungodly prate and rejoice in their love of the world, the elect soul pines in her longing for heaven, because she fears to lose that which she loves so long as it is delayed." And Psellus turns it Pseilus. prettily of the virgin life, looking to the Creator and not to the creature : 'iSou, (^Tjcri, KaX^ rvyxdveis, S> -napQive, Ixfts yap Ofx/xara Tepirva irepicrT^pas ttapQhov oiroTai' GOV tovs o(p6a\uovs air 4 a Tp€\p as ttjs irKawrjs, Kal irphs ifxe rhv TrXcurrovpyhv rhu ahv ivarevi^en' irepiarcpas Se ij.€fxvr]Tai uui/ 6(p9a\jj.ous 6 \6yos, rb KaOaphv tov /3Ae/u,uaTos (rr^ixaiuwv -^7)9 irapdeuoVf Kal yap roaovTov Kadaphv (crx^v iKelvrj fiKefifiaf &aT€ KareiSe Kadapis 7hv KaWicrroi/ vvfM s. Bernard, to draw many with her to the joys of heaven. Finally, Hugo Vict, they expound this whole verse of the Blessed Virgin, Dicm.'^Carth./'^^^' in her purity, fair in her lowliness, fair in the ' beauty of her earthly body,/a/rer in the loveliness ofi her stainless soul, fair in her virginity, fair in hen childbearing, and, as she was full of grace, and espe-- cially dowered by the Holy Ghost, she has doves eyes. The Hyron, Tu columba nubilis, Reginamise- Tiirtur subarrhata, ricordice. Tu domus eburnea, Civitas murala ; Tu sic dicta viola, Quod inviolata, Ager, rosa, lilium, Mater, uxor, nata. Mary, thou art bridal dove, Thou art turtle dowered, Ivory abode of love, City strongly towered ; Thou, inviolate by stain, Name of violet bearest, Rose-bud, lily-flower, plain, Child, spouse, mother fairest. 16 Behold, thou art fair, my beloved, yea, pleasant ; also our bed is green. It is now the Bride who speaks in answer to the praises which the Bridegroom has just uttered to her. And here at once arises the question so much debated in the Early Church, as to the physical aspect of Cheist. The Eastern Fathers, almost universally, I. 16.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 51 press the literal sense of such texts as that in Isaiah. " He hath no form or comeliness, and when we shall , see Him there is no beauty that we should desire Him." But the Western doctors, with more than equal unanimity, explain these and the like phrases as denoting only the lowliness and suffering of His earthly life, Who yet was " fairer than the children of ps. xiv. 3. men." The Bride, remarks Origen, now that she is ori^en gifted with the spiritual insight of doves' eyes, recog- xheodoret. nises the beauty of her Spouse, namely, the Godhead Tres Patr. hidden under the veil of Humanity. TJiou, she says, art fair. She does not qualify the words as He did, g f^^ by adding among men, for she knows of none other Nyss. beauty save His, not even her own, as she ascribes it Angeiomus. all to Him. " To us who now believe," exclaims S. Augustine, " the Bridegroom ever seems fair. Fair s. August, was God the Word with God, fair in the Virgin's '^ ^^' •^^^' womb, where He lost not His Divinity and took on Him Manhood. Fair was the Word born an Infant, for when He was an Infant, when He sucked, and was carried in arms, the Heavens spake, and the Angels uttered praise. A star guided the wise men, and the Food of the meek was worshipped in the manger. Fair was He then in heaven, fair on earth, fair in the womb, fair in His parents' arms, fair in His miracles, fair in His scourges, fair inviting us to life, fair reck- ing not of death, fair laying down His life, fair taking it again, fair upon the Tree, fair in the tomb, fair in heaven, fair unto the thought." He is not fair only, but pleasant, a yet stronger word, denoting, as they say, far more than mere beauty chislerius. of feature, that winning grace in expression, voice, ges- ture, and act, which attracts affection even as har- monious regularity of countenance compels admiration. And they delight in finding twin sources of beauty in the Hedeemer in the most various ways. First, and most obviously, we may take it of the two Natures in „ p „ His one Person, the first being fair by reason of its Beda^^' Divine essence, the ^econdi pleasant for its tender par- doning grace. " How fair art Thou unto Thine Angels, §. Bernard. O Lord Jesu," cries a Saint, '' in the form of God, in Serm. 45. Thine eternal day, in the splendour of the Saints, Thou splendour and image of the Father's substance, begotten before the morning star. Thou truly ever- lasting and undimmed radiance of unending life ! How pleasant art Thou to me, my Loed, in the very E 2 52 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 16. PS. XXXV. 10. Philo Carp. Aponius. Origen. Ps. cxxi. 6. S. Ambros. S. Greg. Nyss. Tres Patr. Ps. xci. 4. seat of this pleasantness of Thine ! For where Thou didst empty Thyself, where Thou didst strip Thine unwaning light of its natural rays, there Thy loving- kindness shone forth the more, there Thy charity blazed out more brightly, there Thy grace shed its rays further. How bright to me is Thine arising, O Star out of Jacob ; how gleaming is Thy coming up, O Flower of Jesse's Root; how joyous is Thy light, visiting me in darkness, O Dayspring from on high ! How fascinating and wondrous is Thine heavenly might, in Thy conception by the Holy Ghost, in Thy Yirgin-birth, in Thy stainless life, in Thy streams of doctrine, in the flashings of Thy miracles, in the reve- lations of Thy Sacraments ! How brilliantly, O Sun of righteousness, dost Thou arise from the heart of the earth after Thy setting, how beautiful in Thine apparel ! At last, 6 King of Glory, Thou ascendest to the highest heavens. Wherefore then should not all my bones say, ' Lokd, who is like unto Thee?'" He was/air, observes an Eastern Father, in the Pro- phets, but pleasant in the Apostles ; fair in keeping those good things which He gave under the Law, pleasant in the abundant promises of better things m the Gospel. Fair in His pure ^odij , pleasant m His stainless human soul. Also our bed is green. This, the true sense of the Hebrew, is not found either in LXX. or Vulgate. The former has two readings, each adopted by certain expositors. 0«r bed is shady, and Thou art a shadow to our bed. The Vulgate has. Our bed is jioioery. Origen, taking the first reading, explains that the Bride says our bed, because her members are Christ's members, and adds that it is shady because of His promise, "The sun shall not burn thee by day, neither the moon by night," and shady too because of the thick growth of good works from souls watered by His grace, and not parched up with spiritual dryness, under which shade we may avoid the hot breath of sin. Theodoret, who takes the same reading, expounds the bed to be the divine Scriptures, shady because guarded by the grace of the Holy Spieit, and shel- tered from the heat of wickedness. The other LXX. reading, which is the received one, is followed by several Eastern Fathers, but they do not take it, as might be expected, in the sense of those words, " He shall defend thee under His wings, and thou shall I. 16.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 53 be safe under His feathers," but of tlie Human Na- ture of Christ, mercifully shading from our eyes the dazzling glory of His Godhead, on which man cannot look and live. The Latin commentators, for the most s. Greg. M. part, expound the bed of the tranquillity of the Church, flowery Avith the many virtues of the Saints. Beda, Beda. reproducing in a Christian form the explanation of the Targum, adds that the Church is flowery not only with good works, but with the abundant offspring of faithful, produced to God from water and the Spieit, and blooming with the flower of faith. And it is to be noted, continues he, that throughout this book the Bride always expresses a desire to be with her Spouse in the house, on the bed, or any other inner place, whereas the Bridegroom is always summoning His love to outer tasks, to the labours of the vineyards or of the gardens. And that because Holy Church, if it might be, would ever gladly converse with her Lord in the quiet of earthly peace, and bring forth and train up for Him a heavenly progeny. But He ordains her to be tried by constant suflTerings in the present life, that she may arrive, all the purer, at everlasting blessings, and lest, if all temporal things should be too prosperous, she might take pleasure in her exile, and sigh less after the Heavenly Country. Another sees in the flowery bed that hallowed womb where the Rupert. Incarnate Lord rested for nine months, and the same idea, substituting the overshadowing trees (denoting darkness and mystery) for the blossoming flowers of beauty and lowliness, is seen in the way in which the Greek Fathers explain the LXX. reading of Habakkuk ii. 3 : " God shall come from Teman, and the Holy from the thick and shady mountain of Paran." Thus in the Eastern Office for Christmas Day : Rod of the Root of Jesse, _ _ Thou, Flower of Mary born, S- Cosmas. From that thick shady mountain Cain'st glorious forth this morn : Of her, the Ever- Virgin, Incarnate wast Thou made, The immaterial Essence, The God by all obeyed ! I think," observes S. Bernard, "that the Church's s. Bernard. ^ bed, whereon one may rest, means cloisters and con- Serm. 46. ^^ rents, where one lives free from the cares of the world 54 A COMMENTARY ON [I. 16. and the anxieties of life. And it is declared to be flowery, when the conversation and life of the brethren are beautified with the examples and precepts of the Fathers, as though with fragrant flowers." And note, that this bed is flowery, rather than made of cedars and firs, for another reason, that as cut flowers fade quickly, and need to be renewed daily, so it is needful for Reli- gious constantly to renew the vows and resolutions of their profession, so as to offer them fresh and sweet to God. Two other writers see here, by a somewhat forced interpretation, the tomb in which Cheist lay down, called Jlowe)y by reason of the fragrant myrrh Hugo Card, and spices used at His burial. Far more beautiful is Nic. Argent. ^^^ view of Nicolaus de Argentina, who dwells on the Vulgate diminutive lectulus, " little bed," in the text here, and bids us remember that hard and nar- row bed of the Cross, which was the bridal couch of Christ and His Church. And precisely in this sense runs the hymn : Vieyra. Serm. do S. Francisco Xavier. Aponius. Angelomus The Hymn, Hue udju- gum Cal- varies, The fox hath where to lay his head, Her nest receives the sparrow : Thy Monarch, for His latest bed, One plank hath, hard and narrow. Isa. xxviii. 20. Venantius Fortanatus. The Hymn, Pange lingua. Heb. iv. 9. Francis Eaker. Of it the Prophet spake, saying, " The bed is shorter than that a man can stretch himself on it." It was once dry and leafless, but now, because of the Resur- rection, it is the delight of the Western Church to represent it as fleury or pommee, breaking out into blossom and fruit. And so in the great Passiontide hymn: Faithful Cross, above all other One and only noble Tree, None in foliage, none in blossom. None in fruit thy peer may be. And lastly, as this is not our rest, we may take the green or flowery bed of those pastures of heaven, where the Sabbath remaineth for the people of God when they have ended their weary pilgrimage and warfare. Thy vineyards and thine orchards are Most beautiful and fair, Full furnished with trets and fruits Exceeding rich and rare. I. 17.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 55 Thy gardens and thy gallant walks Continually are green ; There grow such sweet and pleasant flowers As nowhere else are seen. Jerusalem ! my happy home ! Would God I were in thee, Would God my woes were at an end, Thy joys that I might see ! 17 The beams of our house are cedar_, and our rafters of fir. The first inquiry here is, Who is the speaker ? All save Origen, who varies from himself on this head, agree that the Bride still speaks. Next, What is the house (LXX. and Vulg. houses) thus described ? The more usual interpretation is that the local Churches on earth are the joint dwelling-place of Cheist and of the elect soul. Theodoret, however, explains it of Holy Theodoret. Scripture, incorrupt as cedar, perfumed as cyjpress (LXX. and Vulg.,) and several Fathers say that the s. Greg, soul itself is the house intended. Taking the common ^^Jugt. org exposition, they tell us that the beams, the most import- s. Bernard, ant part of the Church's building, are her Prelates and great preachers, cedar because of their incorruptness, and that the rafters or fretted ceilings (LXX. (parvu- ixara, Vulg. laquearia) denote the clergy in general, or else the faithful laity, resting, as Beda reminds us, Beda. upon the beams, and lifted bigh from earthly things by their precept and example. Another interpretation sees in the beams the great dogmas on which the Church's structure rests, and in the panels the prac- tical virtues with which the Saints who rest on these Tres Patr. doctrines adorn their dwelling. Not remote from either of these is the view of Honorius, who takes the houses Hon. Aug. to be the cloisters, whose beams are the Abbats and other superiors, and whose panels are the Religious ; of cypress, because that tree does not revive when cut down, and was therefore borne anciently before the bier of the dead, and thus typifies the death to the world of those who seek to be bidden in the taber- nacle of God. Yet again, taking the house to be the s. Greg, soul wherein Christ dwells, its beams, they tell us, are Nyss. the inner virtues, its main strength and support; the panels, less important, but more ornamental, the out- s. Bernard, ward beauty of a devout life. It is to be noted, fur- 56 A COMMENTARY ON [n.i. 1 Kings vi. ther, that both the Temple and palace of Solomon i5j vu. 2, 7, -vvere built of cedar and fir or cypress, and that a re- ference to that fact is intended here. But, whereas they were framed with beams and planks cut from the wood, and therefore dead, here, on the other hand, the Hebrew implies that whole trees, living evergreens, cedars and Jirs, formed the house and shadowed the bed of the Bridegroom, which was therefore more beautiful and enduring than the former temple and palace. And so the Targum : " Solomon the Prophet said. How fair is this house of the sanctuary of the LoED, which is builded by my hands, of cedar wood ! But fairer shall be the house of the sanctuary which shall be builded in the days of Messiah the King, the beams whereof shall be of the cedars of the garden of Eden." And what was that cedar shrine and palace, incorrupt, repelling all evil, save the most pure womb of His immaculate Mother ? Cedar, in her utter purity, cyjpress in her sorrows by the Cross of her Son ; wherefore it is written, " I was exalted like a cedar in Libanus, and as a cypress tree upon tbe mountains of Hermon." Hengsten- berg. Targum. Dion. Carth. Parez. Ecclus.xxiv, 13. The Hymn, Regina cle- mentite. Tu fons, hortus, platanus, Cedrus exaltata, Tu palma, tu olea, Cypiessus plantata. CHAPTER II. Targum. S. Greg. Nyss. Theodoret. Philo Carp. I I am the rose of Sharon, and the lily of the valleys. The first clause here is rendered in the Syriac, LXX., and Vulgate, ^ower of the plain, and modern critics, for the most part, hold that the narcissus, not the rose, is the plant intended. The commentators differ as to the speaker. The Targum, followed by some Greek Fathers, assigns the verse to the Bride, but the ma- jority of the Westerns, with some great Eastern names too, hold that it, as well as the succeeding one, belongs to the Bridegroom, claiming to be Himself the chief II. 1.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 57 glory of that flowery bed of which the Bride had de- Origen. lightedly spoken just before. FollowiDg this interpre- t;assio(l. tation first, let us hear Origen : *' The plain is level bK'"'' ground, cultivated, and tilled by husbandmen. The valleys denote rocky and untilled places. We may thus understand the plain of that people which was cultivated by the Law and the Prophets, and the valleys of the rocky and untilled dwelling of the Gentiles. The Bridegroom was therefore the Flower among the Jewish people, but because the Law brought no man to perfection, therefore the Word of God could not there pass beyond the stage o^ Jloioer, and arrive at the perfection of fruit. But He was made a Lily in the valleys of the Gentiles. What kind of Lily ? Such, no doubt, as He describes in the Gos- pels, which the Heavenly Father clothes. The Bride- % ^^*' '"'• groom becomes then a Lily in this valley, because His Heavenly Father clothed Him with such a garment of flesh as Solomon in all his glory could not have. For Solomon had not a body pure from all desire and from fleshly enjoyments, and thus liable to no sin. But He seems to set forth why He, Who was the Flower of the field, willed to be the Lily of the valleys. Though He had long been the flower of the field, yet He never says that any flower imitating or resembling Him had sprung from that field. But when He be- came the Lily of the valleys, immediately His beloved became a lily too, in imitation of Him ; so that the result of His labour is, that as He is made a lily, so His neighbour, that is, every soul which draws near Him and follows His example, becomes a lily also. What He then says, 'As the lily among thorns, so is My love among the daughters,' we may take as spoken of the Gentile Church, either because she arose from the midst of unbelievers, as out of thorns, or because set in the midst of thorns by reason of noisy heretics around her, attacking her with their teeth." And the same great Father in another place expounds the words Horn. 8. of Christ's Incarnation. For my sake, he says, who was in the valley, the Bridegroom comes into that valley, and becomes a Lily there. Instead of being the Tree of Life, planted in the Paradise of God, He became the Flower of all the plain, that is, of the whole world, of the entire earth. For what could so truly be the flower of all the world as the JSTame of Christ.? His Name is ointment poured out. Aponius sets be- 58 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 1. Aponius. S. Cyril. Alex, de lucarn. Theodoret. S.Ambros. de Spir. Sanct. ii. 5. Alanus de Jnsulis. fore lis this same idea from another point of view. Cheist was, he comments, the flower of the field be- fore His Incarnation, because in His glory He was the worship of the heavenly spirits in all the plain of the heavens, but after His Incarnation He became the Lily of the valleys, when He came down into the vale of tears, and brought with Him three things, the doing-away of sin, the wiping out of falsehood, and the cooling of desire, just as the lily exhibits three qualities, whiteness, fragrance, and medicine for cer- tain complaints after it has been parched in the fire. S. Cyril of Alexandria sees in the perfume of the flower, invisible in the visible blossom, the Godhead united with the Manhood of Cheist, and inseparable from It. Theodoret, agreeing with many others that the words _^oz6'er of the plain denote Cheist's coming to earth, explains the lily of the valleys of His further humiliation, when He went down into the lower parts of the earth, and preached in Hades the Resurrection. Yet again, they take the plain to be His most holy Mother, from whom He sprang by no human will, as the flower grows in spots no man has tilled. And thus S. Ambrose : " Cheist was the Flower of Mary, and sprang from the virgin womb to shed the sweet perfume of faith throughout the world. A flower, though cut down, retains its fragrance, and if pounded, collects it, nor does it lose it by being torn up. So too the LoED Jesus withered not when ground upon the Cross, nor did He disappear when so torn away from us, but when wounded with that piercing of the spear. He, Who cannot die, bloomed yet more beau- teously with the Precious Blood He shed, breathing forth the gift of eternal life to them which were dead." " The human Nature of Cheist," says one of the greatest of the Schoolmen, " is called 2. plain, for as a variety of flowers spring up in a plain, so are there many virtues in the human nature of Cheist. Herein was the violet of lowliness, the rose of patience, the lily of purity. Cheist was the flower of this plain ; that is, its glory because of His Godhead, since He had i by reason of that Godhead the fulness of gifts in His human nature. Fitly is that human nature of Cheist denoted by a plain, because of its width and smoothness, for in Him was no roughness of sin. Whence also He is said to be Lily of the valleys. For as there was perfect humility in Mary and in Christ's human na- n.i.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 59 ture, therefore the person of the Virgin and the Man- hood of the WoED are called valleys." In the lily, beautifully notes another, there are five things ob- Hon. Aug. served. It is white, having a projecting anther of golden hue, it is fragrant, and expanding, and ever curving downwards. So was Chbist white in His Manhood, golden in His Godhead, fragrant in His preaching, open in receiving penitents, bowed down in His condescension to sinners, and in lifting them up. Another Avriter dwells somewhat variously on some of these same qualities. " Christ was a lily," says he, Eucherius, " because of the glory of His Resurrection, externally ^^ ^^^- "^• white because of the glory of His Body, golden within by reason of the resplendence of His soul. And before His Passion He was as it were a closed lily, but when crowned with glory and honour because of that Pas- sion, He was thereafter an open lily, because He dis- closed in His assumed humanity the power of that divine radiance which He had with the Fathee before the world was." So far we have considered how Cheist is Flower and Lily in Himself, and may next turn to ponder how He is these to us. And first, Origen tells us that the words mark different stages of o^&e'^' spiritual progress, that He is the Flower of souls which are like a plain by reason of their simplicity, gentleness, or equity, in that He is in them the begin- ning of good works, the promise of fruit, while to those who search into deeper and more hidden things, as though in the valleys. He becomes a Lily, either in the brightness of purity or the sheen of wisdom, that they too may be lilies, breaking forth from the midst of thorns, that is, fleeing from the thoughts and cares of the world. S. Gregory teaches that Cheist is the Flower of the plain, in that He gives the soul the beauty of heavenly desire; the Lily of the valleys, ' ^^^' because of the purity He infuses into the lowly. And they delight to tell us how He is the crown aad glory and loveliness of the Virgin Life. Cheist, observes |p^ad^°"' S. Jerome, (writing of one who had given herself to her Demetr. LoED,) as the author and Prince of virginity, confi- Cf- s. Am- dently speaks, " I am the flower of the plain and the virgin. Ui. lily of the valleys." The order of Virgins in the g j^^^ ^ Church, comments another, is a plain, that is, an un- Hon. Aug. tilled soil whose flower is Christ, because He is its delight, its crown, and its reward. He is, notes a third, the Lily of the valleys, not of the fields of the Nic. Arg. 60 A COMMENTARY ON [H. 1. active life, mucli less the lily among the thorns, but of those who dwell in the IomIj and sequestered life of contemplation, whereon the rays of the sun pour the heat of love, unstayed and undisturbed by any words of temptation, while the mountains stand around, and s. CIV. 10. |.|^g rivers of grace flow down them into the valleys, so that there is abundance of corn there, and the Lily, finding the water it loves, flourishes abundantly. Following the other interpretation, which ascribes Tres Patr. the words to the Bride, they tell us how the Church is the Jloiver of the plain so far as she consists of believ- ing Israel, levelled to the smoothness of a field by the Law and the Prophets, watered by the rain of hea- venly knowledge, bright with the flowers of holiness. The Gentiles, uneven and rough through unbelief, and depressed by the weight of sin, are the valleys out of which the Lily springs from the depth, so high that she cannot be hid even in the lowest parts of the vale, lifting up her head in the grace and beauty of faith, of purification, and of contemplation of God. The Philo Carp. Church under the Law, remarks another Greek Fa- ther, not dissimilarly, calls herself a flower, when she has listened to the voice of the Prophets, and striven to serve God. But when she has heard the voice of Cheist Himself in the Gospel, telling His disciples s. Mat. vi. to cast away all worldly anxiety, and saying, " Con- 28- sider the lilies how they grow," then, attaining to the loveliness and fragrance of true devotion, she is bold s. Greg. ^^ ^^J' -^ ^^ ^^^^ ^^h' They take it too, of any holy Nyss. soul growing in the plain of this world, exposed to wind and storm, but lifting itself up to heaven and Card. Hail, diff'using perfume around. And the words plain and grin. valleys denote twofold humility ; the first, that where- by any one humbles himself to his superiors, and does not try to rise above his equals : and the second, that more perfect lowliness w^hereby he humbles himself to his equals, and strives to descend below his inferiors. Not any flower, but especially a lily, because it is white externally and with a golden spike within. Such is the soul, which is compassed with the glory of righte- ousness, and which carries within its inmost shrine the spiritual gift of wisdom and knowledge. How much more then is it true of her who was herself that pure calyx within which the golden glory of the Eternal Dion. Carth. Wisdom tabernacled ! Well may the Ecstatic Doctor say, " The most Blessed Virgin is the most blooming, ir. 2.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 61 fairest, and most fragrant flower of the field, that is, of this world, wherein we are placed as in the arena of contest, for our life on earth is a warfare. She is also the flower of that other field, the garden of deliglits, the heavenly Paradise. And again, she is the flower of the field, that is, of the Church Militant in its pil- grimage here on earth, whose mother, flower, queen, and advocate she is, obtaining by her prayers and merits the ornaments and perfume of merits for the Church. Then, she is the flower of every devout soul which loves her, into whose thought she never enters without fruit, and without shedding her sweetness around. She is the Lily of the valleys, that most sweet and peerless Virgin Mother of God, the blooming off- spring of her lowly parents, from whom she sprang as a most fair Lily, nor was Solomon in all his glory arrayed as that fair Lily was." And lastly, taking our own version, we may see in the rose and lily the double grace of martyrdom and chastity which forms the choicest coronal of heaven. Thus S. Bernard ob- serves, " The flower is virginity, the flower is mar- serm. 47. tyrdom, the flower is good deeds. In the garden, virginity ; in the field, martyrdom ; in the chamber, good works. He is the flower of the garden, the Virgin sprung from a virgin stem. He too is the flower of the field, the Martyr, the Crown of Martyrs, the force of martyrdom." Wherefore the Paris Breviary fitly sings in the Common of Virgin Martyrs : ^ , ,.,. , -r. .-, , • Sant. Vict. Roses and lilies are trie Bridegroom s portion, The Hymn, Thou, to thy Bridegroom evermore found faithful, Quidsacram, Gavest Him roses as a Martyi-, gavest Virgo. Lihes, a Virgin. 2 As the lily among thorns^ so is my love among the daughters. Noting the contrast, so strongly marked in the first Theodoret clause, they observe that as the lily surpasses thorns, g j^^^^. q * so does the Church of God excel the Synagogue, the schools of philosophy, and the parties of the State. Again, the Church was a lily among thorns in the time of her greatest purity and beauty, when she was the victim of repeated persecutions. Whereupon Hono- Honor, rius : " As I, saith the Bridegroom, am the Lily of the August, valleys, the ornament of the lowly, so thou. My love, ' "^ ^°^' shalt be the lily among thorns, the glory of the Gen- 62 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 2. Cassiod. S. August, de Bapt. 5. S. Greg. M. Com. a Lap, Tres Patr. Hugo Card. Eccles. X. I S. Greg. Nyss. Apomus. S. Bernard. Serm. 48. tiles ; and as I am tlie Lily among tliorns, that is, tlie Jews who pierce and wound Me, so thou, O Church, My love, shalt be among the Gentile daughters of Babylon, which is confusion, who shall pierce thee with many a thorn, and rend thee with many a suffer- ing." The words are true also of that inner Church of the elect, compassed by the outer Church of the called, wherein are many reprobates who show no grace or beauty in their lives, but are like thorns, flowering quickly in temporal prosperity, withering swiftly in goodness, wounding the devout with their evil habits, cut down and given to feed the fire. Such as these are daughters, indeed, but not of God, rather of the evil one, carnal and worldly souls, given up to the wounding and torturing pleasures of the senses. And observe further, that a lily growing amongst thorns ensures the wounding of him who would gather the flower for his very ov/n. On which a devout writer comments thus : " As the Bride's love for her Spouse is signified here, so also is His love for her. For he that would gather a lily amongst thorns, necessarily suffers their pricks ; which is evidently true of the Bridegroom Himself, for He, gathering that lily from the midst of the reprobate, suffered the prickmgs of the thorns, whilst He underwent the rendings of the persecutors as He was assembling His elect by His own preaching and that of His disciples. Whence it is written, ' Whoso breaketh a hedge [the synagogue of the people,] a serpent shall bite him.' The Lokd acted like a hunting dog, which pursuing wild game, thrusts its head amongst the prickles of thorns, fearing no wounds so that it may take its prey. He drew forth the Church, lurking like a wild beast amongst thorns, that is, amongst the reprobate ; but He en- dured the piercings of the thorns even to bloodshed- ding, in token of which He wore a thorny crown upon the Cross." The soul which clings to Cheist amidst the troubles, cares, and persecutions of an ungodly world, is also fitly called a lily among thorns. But ail these cannot really hurt the lily, rather do they set off" her beauty. " The thorn," expounds S. Bernard, " is sin, the thorn is punishment, the thorn is a false brother, the thorn is evil hard at hand. ' As the lily among thorns, so is My love among the daughters.' O shining lily, O frail and delicate flower, the unbe- lieving and destroyers are with thee, see then that thou n. 2.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 63 walk cautiously amongst the thorns. The world is full of thorns. They are in the earth, in the air, in thy flesh. To be amongst them, and not to be hurt by them, comes of the Divine power, not of thine own strength. 'But be of good cheer,' saith He, ' I have f- ^'^^'^ x^''- overcome the world.' Therefore, although thou seest the prickles of tribulations, like those of thorns, aiming at thee on every side, let not thine heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid, ' knowing that tribulation Rom. v. 3. worketh patience ; and patience, experience ; and ex- perience, hope ; and hope maketh not ashamed.' Con- sider the lilies of the field, how they flourish and bloom among the thorns. If God so guards the grass which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, how much more His love and dearest Bride ?" And Henr. another holy writer treats at much length of the various Harph. thorns which must be overcome by patient continuance in well-doing. The truly patient soul is likest to the ; beauty of Christ, to the measure of a perfect man, in that it bears all cheerfully, and loves those who put it to pain ; first, by words of slander and calumny, then by actual wrong- doing. How is this patience to be attained ? Hearken, O lily among thorns. " My soul Ps. cxx. 5, 6. hath long dwelt among them that are enemies unto peace. I labour for peace." And again : " They that ps. xxxvui. went about to do me evil, talked of wickedness, and 12, 13. imagined deceit all the day long. As for me, I was like a deaf man and heard not, and as one that is dumb, who doth not open his mouth." And this is effected by loving contemplation of our Maker, be- I cause the soul that looks on God is deaf and blind to meaner things, and is filled with such delights in think- ing on Him that pain becomes of no moment, or even a source of pleasure, as the Cross was to S. Andrew, the fire to S. Laurence, the stones to S. Stephen, the dungeon and rack*to S. Agatha. And this patience is threefold, in heart, word, and deed, indisposing men to vengeance, leading them on to entire forgive- ness of their enemies, and thence to hearty interest in ] and affection for them. Those who begin by cheek- ,j ng their own impulse to revenge, at first from the ower motive of fear of results, and then for the sake )f salvation, and at last from true love of God, attain jven on earth the " peace to men of good will," pro- S. Luke ii. nised by the Angels at the Nativity, and, tried by ^'*- nany sorrows and tribulations, reach at last the per- 64 A COMMENTARY ON [H. 2. feet tranquillity of the children of God, in their own beloved Home. Among the davqhters. That is, among all elect souls, loving God the Father with filial ten- irimbert. derness, but yet thorny, as beset with the pricks of original and actual pin, and unable to fulfil His com- mandments perfectly. And therefore there is only one of whom it is truly written, " Many daughters Prov. xxxi. have done virtuously, but thou excellest them all," and ?Esd V 24 ^.^^ again, " Of all the flowers Thou hast chosen one ■ lily." Keble, Ave Maria ! blessed Maid, Christian Lilv of Eden's fragrant shade, ^^"'"' Who can express the love That nurtured thee, so pure and sweet, Making thy heart a shelter meet For Jesus' holy dove ! Dion. Carth. Whereupon the Carthusian : Although there were many holy virgins, yet in respect of the Most Blessed Virgin they seem as though but thorns, in that they had some sinfulness, and though pure in themselves, yet the embers of evil were not utterly quenched in them. But the Virgin Mother of God was perfectly freed from all sin, the embers of evil were completely quenched in her, and yet she was filled with the in- Rupert. tensest love. Another reminds us that she was indeed among thorns, in that she, like her Son, was a mark for slanderous tongues, she, Avith her Son, suffered at the Cross. " As a rose groweth among thorns," says Serm^Angel. *^^ great Swedish Saint, " so grew the Blessed Virgin 16. * * in this world among troubles ; and as the rose in- creases, so do the thorns likewise ; thus as Mary, the choicest of roses, advanced in age, so much the more deeply was she wounded by the thorns of tribulation." , Another Saint refers the thorns to Our Lady's kinship ' s. Pet. Dam. to the unbelieving Hebrews. " Sprung from the thorny race of Jews, she shone bodily with the pureness of virgin modesty, and she glowed in soul with the warmth of double charity, she was ever fragrant in good works, and with the unvarying impulse of her hearfi she soared up towards heavenly things." A Christian poet, six hundred years before the great Bishop of Ostia, had expressed nearly the same thoughts in verse : Sedulius. Et velut in spinis mollis ro^a surgit acutis, IsUl quod lajdit habens, raatremque obscurat honore ; Sic Ev8B de stirpe sacra veniente Maria, Serm. 3, de Nat. B.V.M II. 3.] SONG OF SONGS. 65 Virginis antiquae facinus nova Virgo piavit, Sicut spina rosam, genuit Judsea Mariam. As from the sharp thorns springs the gentle rose, Stingless, and hides its mother with its hloom ; So blessed Mary, come of Eva's stem, A new Maid, purged that elder Maiden's sin. Thorns bear the rose, Judea Mary bore. 3 As the apple-tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among the sons. I sat down under his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste. When Cheist took the nature of man, He came s. creg. down into the wood of this life, and became one of its Nyssen. trees, but a fruitful one, nay, able to make fruitful trees of men however evil and wild. And human life is called a ivood,^ because in it are found many things which beset the soul, lurking as wild beasts do in a forest, sluggish when the sun is hot, but active in the darkness. Because the "singular beast" which feeds ps. ixxx.i3, in the wood had sorely hurt the beautiful vine of vuigate. human nature, therefore the apple-tree was planted in the wood ; which, in that it is a tree, is of like nature with the wood of humanity ; for Cheist was tempted in our likeness, though without sin. But in that it bears such fruit as to gratify the senses, it is more unlike the rest of the wood than the lily is unlike the thorns. For the pleasantness of the apple is common to three senses, it is beautiful to the sight, fragrant to the smell, and sweet to the taste. So Cheist is more than the Bride, for He is the joy of our eyes, and the ointment to our smell, and life to us who eat of Him ; but human nature, even if perfected in virtue, is but a flower, not feeding the husbandman, but merely deck- ing itself. For He needs not our good things, whereas we do need His. Therefore the purified soul beholds her Bridegroom made the apple-tree in the wood, that It is almost a common- place to note that this figure is used by Dante in the very opening of the Divine Comedy. Nel mezzo del cammin di nos- tra vita, Mi ritrovai pel una selva os- Chi la diritta via era smar- rita. Ahi quanto a dir qual era d cosa dura Questa selva selvaggia ed aspra e forte, Che nel pensier paura. rinaova la 66 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 3. Theodoret. S. Ambros. S. Bernard. Philo Carp. Origen. S.Ans.Laud. Aponius. Psellus. Ovid. Ep. ex Pont. 15. Origen. S. Bernard. Serm. 48. C'assiodor. S. Greg. M. Beda. Theodoret. Tres Patr. graffing into Himself all the wild boughs of that wood, He may cause them to bring forth fruit like His own. They assign other reasons too why Chkist is called an apple-tree,^ and several of them dwell on His feeding us with the Gospel, while the Holy Eucharist is the idea which suggests itself to others, as the juiciness of the apple makes it both food and drink, and so Cheist gives us His Bodj^ and Blood in the Sacrament of the Altar. A Greek and a Latin commentator, in distant centuries, following up this view, understand here, to make the simile more perfect, a pomegranate-tree, (therein agreeing with the Arabic version,) because the juice of that fruit is ruddy and watery, typifying that which flowed from Cheist's side upon the Cross. They have pushed the metaphor further, and remarked how the grains from which the fruit is named lie en- closed in the ruddy flesh within the rind, just as the members of Cheist, in the One Church, are united in His Body, crimson with His life-blood : Quae numero tot sunt, quot in horto fertilis arvi Punica sub lento cortice grana rubent. Many, as in a fertile orchard's soil Beneath their slight rind blush the Punic seeds. Among the sons. They vary much in expounding these words. Some will have it that the Angels, or Angels and men together are meant, but S. Bernard protests against this view, on the ground that Cheist is spoken of as He appeared when made lower than the Angels, and thus, though fairer and more fruitful than the trees of the wood, than all mankind, not so glorious to the eye as many trees of the orchard or park. The praise given Him here, observes the Saint, is poor and small, as coming from one who is small. It is not the mighty Loed, highly to be praised, that is commended, but the Loed, small, yet highly to be loved, the little Child Who was born for us. Limiting, then, the word sons in this wise, some will have it that the Apostles and Prophets, and the elect generallj^ God's special children by adoption, are here intended, those trees of Eden around the Tree of Life. Others, taking it in a bad sense, refer it to evil men generally, J It may be observed that modern critics, generally speak- ing, say that the citron, not the opple, is the tree denoted by niEn, but the mystical sense is not affected thereby. IL 3] THE SONG OF SONGS. 67 as having the vrildness and brute terrors of the forest in them, or to the Jews in particular ; or, with further Rupert, restrictions of meaning, many of them see a reference to Aponius. the crucified Redeemer, hanging on the tree between ps^fu"*"^^' the two thieves, suffering Himself, as S. Thomas ob- s. Thomas serves, to be fastened to a tree as its fruit, in order to ^^'^'"^^• atone for the first sin of man, in plucking the fruit from c°228! ^^° ' the tree of knowledge of good and evil. I sat doion under His shadoio icitli great delight. The Hebrew of the first clause, closely followed by the LXX. is, I delighted, and sat down under His shadow. The Vulgate, a little differently, I sat doion under the shadoio of Him Whoin I desired. There are three things, comments Henry Harph, which cause a shadow, Henr. light, medium, and object. Christ, in His Divinity, Harphius. is the Light whence is cast the shadow of God. The medium, whose form this shadow takes, is His Man- hood, by the fulness of His grace, and the abundance of His merits. The object of the light, which becomes the shadow, is our will, lying, of its own glad accord, under the light divine. And as the shadow moves with every motion of the interposed body which causes it, and accompanies it wherever it goes, so the will which has become the shadow of God follows within the guiding of His Spirit in everything, and externally imitates the Manhood of the Lord Jesus, and His teaching in all the paths of perfection. Again ; the origen. shadoio denotes Christ's providential care and guar- Cassiodor. dianship of His Church, and of every soul which puts S-^"^-^*^ • its trust in Him, according to that saying of the Psalmist, " My soul trusteth in Thee, and under the shadow of Ps. ivii. i. Thy wings shall be my refuge." Or you may take it, with S. Gregory, of the Holt Spirit, " The Shadow s. Greg. m. of Christ," says he, " is the protection of the Holy Ghost. For the Holy Ghost overshadows the soul which He fills, because He allays the heat of every temptation, and while He gently fans the soul with the breeze of His inspiration He banishes whatever baneful heat it had been enduring." Yet again, S. Bernard tells us that faith, being the evidence of s. Bernard, things not seen, is shadowy and dark, as we walk by ^^^' ^^' faith and not by sight, although that very shadow is leading us to the full glory of the heavenly vision. And whereas it is not said I delight, and I sit ; but, I delighted, and I sat ; we may understand the Church pj^^^^J^^j. speaking of the time when she was yet in the Syna- g Ambrosl f2 68 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 3. Isa. xxxu. 2. gogue, abiding under the Law, which is but the shadow of the Gospel, and even then by anticipation rejoicing and trusting in Christ alone, looking hopefully for the Man who should " be as an hiding-place from the wind, and a covert from the tempest ; as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land." And they remind us how Elijah lay down s. Bernard, under the shadow of a juniper- tree, and arising, found ^^^' ' a cake baken on the coals, and a cruse of water at his head. So, those who come near to the Cross, find the shadow of Christ fall on them in the mysterious sacra- Nic. Argent, mental Veils wherewith His Body and Blood are hidden from our eyes. Another reminds us that the dark say- ings and hidden things of Holy Scripture, the chosen meditation of the faithful soul, are the shadow of Christ Himself; and the further explanation that every fore- taste given us here in contemplation, is but the shadow of the Beatific Vision, has not been forgotten. Again ; as the Cross is the Tree which throws the shadow, every sorrow and trouble endured for Christ's sake in this world is not merely endured, but delighted in by the faithful soul, which desires to be conformed to His Passion. Irimbert. Thorn. Vercell. Bonar. Oppressed with noonday's scorching heat, To yonder Cross I flee ; Beneath its shelter take my seat, No shade like this for me ! Beneath that Cross clear waters burst, A fountain sparkling free ; And there I quench my desert thirst. No spring like this for me ! A stranger here, I pitch my tent Beneath this spreading tree ; Here shall my pilgrim life be spent, No home like this for me ! For burthen ed ones a resting-place Beside that Cross I see ; Here cast I oiF my weariness, No rest like this for me, Origen. And so resting, she advances in holiness and in like- ness to Him, because as the day passes from noon towards evening, the shadows become longer, and cover a greater space. Of none is it so truly said, II. 3.] THE SOx\G OF SONGS. 69 / sat down under His shadow, implying long and Rupert, happy rest, as of her concerning whom the Angel spake, " The power of the Highest shall overshadow s. Lukei. thee," for her abiding in the peace of God was of ^^' ^ no brief hour, but for all time. They tell us too how the Saints, striving to imitate the Sun of Righ- teousness, are His shadows, a delight to those who xres Patr. \ hearken to their teaching and follow their examples. I And Sis fruit teas sioeet to my taste. There are many such fruits, for the Tree of Life bears twelve, Rev. xxii. 2. besides those fruits of the Spirit which the Apostle Gal. v. 22. counts up for us. And first, it is the preaching of ^^pj"^^?^* Cheist's Passion, and that which comes thence, the remission of our sins. Then, there is the meditation origen. on God's love, a true sustenance of the soul, and the contemplation of the Godhead, Manhood, and Life of Christ, whereof a Saint tells us : " Cheist Himself is ^- ^^®^- ^■ a fruitful Tree, planted in our hearts by faith, which tree, if our soul love as it deserves, and tend carefully, brings forth sweet and wholesome fruits. When the soul eagerly gathers and eats of these, she esteems all worldly pleasures as inferior to their sweetness." Again ; the Holy Eucharist, as noted above, is the Aponius. fruit of that Tree which gives us both food and drink. Rupert.^ ' He Himself, when born for us, the fruit of the over- Diou. earth, shadowing Spieit, was sweet to His Mother as she pressed her lips to Him. Further ; as fruit is the ultimate product of the tree, so action is the ultimate product of man's will put into exercise, and when that will is moved by a higher influence than any of earth, then man's good works are the fruit of the Spirit, Harpii. pleasant to the palate, and not biting, and yet palling, like earthly delights. Words are but leaves ; devout thoughts and inward devotion are the flower ; but only the perfect Christian life is the fruit. And they tell Dion. Carth. us, too, that the deeper insight into the things of God y^°(.™\ which is attained by contemplative Saints in mystic vision is, in an especial manner, the fruit of that same Tree which gives us the other fruits of refreshment and consolation in our hungering and thirsting after righteousness here below, and who are bidden to " taste Ps. xxxiv. s. and see how gracious the Lord is," and find Him in- deed sweet to their taste or palate, that spiritual un- ^^^ p^^^ derstanding without which the choicest dainties are insipid. 70 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 4. Theodoret. Cassiodor. Hugo Vic- torin. S. Greg. M Tar gum. Hugo Card. S. Just. Org S. Bernard. Serm. 49. Acts ii. 2. Beda. S. Bernard. Acts ii. 13. Adam. Vict. The Se- quence, Lux jucunda for Pente- cost. 4 He brought me to the banqueting-house, and his banner over me was love. The hanqueting-liouse. More exactly, with LXX. and margin of A. V., the house of wine. The Vulgate is but little different, the chamber of wine. They take the words, firstly, of admission into the Catholic Church, wherein alone is the wine of the Spirit to be found. Next ; it is explained of Holy Scripture, a view not very remote from that of the Targum, which calls Mount Sinai the house where the wine of the Law was stored up for Israel. That, after all, remarks Cardinal Hugo, was only the chamber of water, the mere out- ward and typical sense. Not till Cheist came for His bridal with the Church, was the water turned into wine, and the inner mystical meaning revealed. But as the revelation was not completely given till the ad- vent of the Paraclete, some explain the house ofioine to be that upper chamber in Jerusalem where the dis- ciples were gathered together on the Day of Pentecost. " Do you not think," asks S. Bernard, " that the chamber of zcine is that dwelling where the disciples were assembled, when ' suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting,' and fulfilled the prophecy of Joel ? Might not each of them, going forth inebriated with the plenteousness of that house, and given to drink of such pleasure as out of a river, truly say, ' The King hath brought me into the cham- ber of wine ?' " This was that new wine put into new bottles, of which the Lord spake, so that the Jews were in one sense right when they said, " These men are full of new wine." Utres no\a, non vetusti, Sunt capaces novi musti; Vasa parat vidua ; Dat liquorem Helisseus, Nobis sacrum rorem Deus, Si corda sint congrua. Bottles new, no longer olden, Hold that wine, so new and golden; Lo, the widow's jars are here : Oil Elisha is renewing, God gives us His own bedewing, If our hearts prepared appear. Again ; remembering that it is written, " Wisdom hath 11. 4.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 71 builded her house, she hath hewn out her seven pillars : Prov. ix. she hath killed her beasts ; she hath mingled her wine ; ^' ^ she hath also furnished her table," some explain the Nyss. house of u'ine to be the Altar of God, where the Cup ^^p^^^- of Salvation, the Wine which truly maketh glad the s^pascii. heart of man, is given by the Bridegroom to His love. Radb. And with this sense the h an qneting -house of the A. V. best accords. Also they see here a reference to the progress of the soul in prayer and contemplation, when God bestows the wine of comfort, joy, love, and fer- vour. First, as the Greek Fathers tell us, by medita- ^^^ '^^^'■• tion on the mystery of the Incarnation, because Christ's Human Body is the house wherein dwells God the Word, the true Wine of the soul. Then, as a great Latin Doctor adds, " What can we better understand s. Greg. M. by the chamber of wine than the hidden contemplation of eternity ? In this eternity the holy Angels are ine- briated with the wine of wisdom, when, beholding God face to face, they are filled with every spiritual delight. Into this the holy soul enters, if it leave all temporal things behind, and be brought in by the Bridegroom, and there tastes whatsoever is bestowed upon it of those delights of the Angels. And if as yet, because still detained in a corruptible body, she cannot fill herself completely ; nevertheless, even from that very little which she can hurriedly take, she understands how much she ought to love that which she does love." Nay, more, add others, for the draughts she there im- "°"'"*jy''\ bibes make her utterly forget everything else, and "^° take from her all wish, yea, all power, of returning to her former life. And lastly ; the house of wine is inter- Dion. Carth. preted of the heavenly mansion where the marriage- feast of the Lamb is made ready. And the Church says of this, not, Se ivill bring me in, but. He brought me in. And that for two reasons, first, because His promise is so sure, that a thing pledged by Him is as certain as though it were already past ; and again, He has be- stowed so many foretastes of everlasting blessedness even here on earth that we may truly say, Ke brought me into thebanqueting-Jiouse,y^h.evQ the Saints assemble Origen. from the East and the West, and sit down with Abra- ham, Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of God. And His banner over me ivas love. Little doubt what that banner is, the sign of that love greater than which no man hath, that a man lay down his life for his friends. 72 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 4. Salve Crux, arbor Vitae pra^clara, Christi vexillum, Thronus et ara. Hail, Cross, Life's Tree Glorious alone, Christ Jesus' banner, Altar, and thi'one. But it will not be the token of warfare in the House of Wine on hio;h, as it is in the Church Militant on earth. There it will be, as the same hymn continues, the em- blem of past victory, the pledge of everlasting peace, and the glory of the triumphant Saints : Crux coelestis Signum victoriae, Belli robur Et palma glorise. Cross of the heavens, Victory's crown, Strength in the battle, Palm of renown. Ghisierius. Here, the office of the banner is manifold. First, it is the summons to the nation, to assemble the host. And isa. ixii. 10. gQ j^ jg written, "Lift up a standard for the people." Jer. li. 27. Next, it is the signal for the battle : " Set ye up a standard in the lands, blow the trumpet among the nations, prepare the nations against her." Thirdly, the great banner marks the tent of the Leader, for Numb. ii. 2. " Every man of the children of Israel shall pitch by his own standard, with the ensign of their father's house." And in all these ways the Cross of Cheist is the banner of the Church. But the Vulgate reads, less exactly, He set love in order over me. Ordinavit s. Hieron. in me charitatem. " Love," observes S. Jerome, writ- Ep. ad ing to Marcella, "has no order, and impatience knows ^*'"^® ■ no measure, and therefore this is a hard thing." But God is the author of order, not of confusion, and there- fore the first way in which we are taught His love in order is by contemplation of the Three Persons of Aponius. the Holy Trinity, wherein we learn first, the Name of the Father, Who so loved the world that He gave His Only-begotten Son for it; secondly, the Name of the Son, the Eternal Wisdom Who loved us and gave Himself for us ; thirdly, the Name of the Holy Ghost, the Spirit of love, Who comforts and strengthens us. And our order is therefore that we ir. 5,] THE SONG OF SONGS. 73 are to love the Lord our God with all our heart ; with all our mind ; and with all our strength. He set love in order, for He loved us first, and thus drew us on to love Him. S. Bernard understands the gift of spiritual Cassiodor. tact and discretion, which regulates and guides our ^eda. zeal, teaching us what things are to be preferred to serm!^49)^ others, — the love of God to the love of man ; heaven and so. to earth ; eternity to time ; the soul to the flesh. But love is also divided into active and affective, and it is after the order of God's law that active love has to busy itself with less perfect things, and persons, for their sakes, rather than for its own, when it would prefer rising with affective love, to the contemplation of heavenly things. It is to be noted that the LXX. takes this whole verse as addressed by the Bride to the companions of the Bridegroom, and reads, Bring ye me into the house of ivine, set love in order over me, applying the words first to the Jewish Church calling on the Prophets to lead her to Cheist, then of the Origen. Christian Church appealing to the Apostles and Doc- ^^^^° ^**"p- tors ; and afterwards of faithful souls asking for further instruction in divine mysteries, and for guidance in their affections. It has thus been not inaptly applied De Ponte. to postulants for the Religious Life, asking for admis- Ghisierius. sion from Superiors, and instruction in the rule and order which they propose to follow. The Yulgate may also be explained to mean. He set love in array over me ; that is, as my chief and leader in the battle, teach- ^^so Card. ing me that in all things charity is the more excellent way. Or, again, He arrayed his love against me, at- Sanchez. tacking the fortress of my heart with power which I could not resist, entering it as its Lord and Conqueror, and setting His banner in token of victory over its highest battlements. generous love ! that He who smote j. h. New- In man for man the foe, man, Dream The double agony in man ofGerontius, For man should undergo ; And in the garden secretly, And on the Cross on high, Should teach His brethren, and inspire, To suffer and to die. 5 Stay me with flagons, comfort me with apples, for I am sick of love. The version before us seems to be the intreaty of 74 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 5. Theodoret. S. Ambros. in Ps. cxix. S. Greg. M. Origen. Aponius. Titelmann. Pia Desid. iii. 2. the Cliurcli for the Holy Eucharist under its two forms, the flagons denoting the chalice, and the apples the species of Bread, true medicine of the soul which longs for Christ. But there is a twofold difficulty in ac- cepting this apparently obvious meaning. In the first place, the Bride speaks not to the Bridegroom, but to His friends, for the verbs are in the plural, and He alone would be asked to give Himself. Next, the A. V. is at variance with the older translations and with modern criticism. The LXX. reads, Strengthen me loith ointments, strew me with apples, for I am wounded with love. The ointments are those which have been poured forth, the apples are the fruit of that Tree under whose shadow the Bride sat down. And the words are thus, notes Theodoret, a petition to the Bridegroom's friends to heap up about her every memory of His love, to guard her against herself, to hinder her from straying to any other than Him. Thus too a Western Doctor, following the same read- ing, tells us that the ointment is that which Cheist shed, the apples, what hung upon the Tree. Others, however, explain the ointments to be the graces of the Holy Spieit, and particularly that of ghostly strength, while the apples are discourses on divine things, sweet to the palate of the Bride. The Vulgate is somewhat different : Prop me with flowers, surround me with apples. It is, says S. Gregory, the mother calling her children round her bed, that in seeing their beauty and growth she may find some comfort, the floioers being the younger and weaker offspring, the beginners in the spiritual life ; the apples, those who have gone on further towards perfection. And with this agrees Origen's interpretation, which sees catechumens and faithful souls in the two, and also that of Aponius, who explains the flowers of all pure souls, and the apples of the Apostles, growing out of Cheist, as out of a tree, by His teaching. Again, the words have been aptly taken to denote severally the words and the deeds of Cheist, which the Bride beseeches His companions to recall to her memory, lest she should fail to bear them in mind ; and thus she looks at them and turns them over lovingly as the letters and gifts of her ab- sent Bridegroom. Hermann Hugo reminds us that it is no earthly fiowers and fruits that she desires, but roses and lilies and apples, such as S. Dorothea in the legend sent to Theophilus by the hand of an Angel, 11. 5.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 75 to tell him of her arrival after martyrdom in the garden of God, blooming in its pride when earth was lying frozen in the grasp of winter. The Bride would fain Hugo Card, have many such flowers heaped around her, — roses by the martyrs ; lilies by the virgins ; violets by the con- fessors and penitents ; and apples by all who do good works in the Church, and bring forth fruit to perfec- tion. And yet again, the flowers may well be the prayers of the faithful, and the apples their works, by ■which the Church in general, or any soul in particular, may be aided. Modern criticism translates the first r>e Wette. clause of the verse, strengthen me toith raisin-cakes, and ^^ ^'|'am. the latter, sti^eio my bed with apples, (i.e. probably, apple- xxx. 12. leaves.) The raisin-calces, made of dried grapes, out of which the wine has been pressed, but still retaining much sweetness, and amongst the most satisfying of foods, and the apples, or their leaves, used, not for sus- tenance, but for a bed whereon to recline, most fitly typify that spiritual communion of the faithful soul which is cut off, by one cause or another, from oppor- tunities of Sacramental feeding at the Altar of God. Strength and rest are to be had even thus, and the sick may be healed by touching the hem of Jesu's garment. Lord, I cannot seek Thee LyraEucha- At Thine Altar-throne, ristica. Yet may I receive Thee, Friendless and alone. Far from Priest and Altar, Christ, to Thee I cry, Come to me in spirit, Let me feel Thee nigh. In my silent worship Let me share the Feast, Be Thv Love the Altar, Be Thyself the Priest. For I am sick of love. O happy infirmity, where Gisten. the " sickness is not unto death," but unto life, " for s.Johnxi.4. the glory of God !" O happy fever, that proceedeth ;°"^^p- not from a consuming, but a perfecting fire ! O happy sl^BasU.'M. disorder, wherein the soul relisheth no earthly things, but desires only the savour of heavenly food ! The LXX. reads, loounded with love; that is, as all the Easterns agree, with the love of God. And thus S. s. Aug. in Augustine says, " She calls herself wounded with love. Ps. xxxvii. For she loved, and did not yet possess ; she grieved, 76 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 5. Origen. S. Hieron. Ep. 140. Ps. xlv. 6. S. Greg. Nyssen. Isa. xlix. 2. S. John X. 30 : xiv. 23. Francis Quarles, School of the Heart, 33. Cassiodor. S. Greg. M. Beda. Hugo Card. because she had not yet ; therefore, if she grieved, she was wounded, but the wound hurried her to true healthfulness. For he who is not wounded with this wound, never can attain to true health." Every virtue, observes Origen, wherewith the soul is affected, is as it were an arrow of God shot at the soul, arrows that are very sharp, so that it is subdued unto Him. " God," says an ancient Father, "hurled His Son at me. His Bride, as at a target, a javelin whereof is said by the Prophet, * In the shadow of His hand hath He hid Me, and made Me a polished shaft.' That arrow, piercing me with its point of faith, hath brought its Archer together with it, according to that saying, ' I and My Father are one.' ' We will come unto him, and make our abode with him.' " And so a quaint old English poet says : Lord, empty all Thy quivers, let there be No corner of my spacious heart left free, Till all be but one wound, wherein No subtle sight-abhorring sin May lurk in secret, unespied by Thee, Or reign in power, unsubdued by Thee, Perfect Thy purchased victory, That Thou may'st ride triumphantly, And leading captive all captivity May'st put an end to enmity in me. Then, blessed Archer, in requital, I To shoot Thine arrows back again will try ; By prayers and praises, sighs and sobs, By vows and tears, by groans and throbs, I'll see if I can pierce and wound Thine Heart, And vanquish Thee again by Thine own art ; Or, that we may at once provide For all mishaps that may betide Shoot Thou Thyself, Thy polished shaft, to me. And I will shoot my broken heart to Thee. The interpreters of the Vulgate reading, which is also that of A. v., explain the words to denote the eager, restless longing of the exiled soul for the Heavenly Country, which gives her strong distaste for earthly things, and makes her languid in all that regards them. And her sickness, adds another, is threefold. She is sick because of her own vileness, which she fears will repel her Spouse ; sick with anxiety, lest she should fall short in those good works which He desires ; sick by reason of her frailty, lest she should become cold and lax through want of perseverance. And accord- II. 6.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 11 ingly, she asks for three remedies against these, — Jioivers, to give her beauty ; apples, to give her fruit ; and, in the next verse, His own Hand to be her stay. None has expressed this yearning for heaven, this sickness of earth, both springing from love, better than S. Teresa. Ah, what a length does life appear, TiieRhyttim, How hard to bear this exile here, vino sin vivir How hard from weary day to day in me. To pine without relief: The yearning hope to break away From this my prison-house of clay Inspires so sharp a grief, That overcome I weep and sigh, Dying because I do not die. * m * *^ Ah, Lord, my Light and living Breath, Take me, take me from this death, And burst the bars that sever me From my true life above. Think how I die Thy Face to see, And cannot live away from Thee, my eternal Love. And ever, ever weep and sigh, Dying because I do not die. And in this sickness of love, comments a great master (jgrgon, of the ascetic life, the Bride passes out of herself, and sympsaima falls into a death which is life, a trance wherein, no ^^ c*"*- longer able to sustain herself, she is stayed up in the everlasting Arms, and therefore adds, as she feels them, 6 His left hand is under my head, and his right hand doth embrace me. " The Bridegroom cannot bear the suffering of His s. Bernard. Bride, He is at hand ; for He cannot delay when called Serm. 57. by such longings. And because He finds that she was faithful in her tasks, and eager for gain while He was absent, in that she desired to have flowers and apples to be added to her, He returns to her now with an even more spontaneous reward of grace. He supports her reclining head with one of His arms, holding the other ready to embrace her, and cherish her in His bosom." And on the difference between these two hands, let us hear the Doctor of Grace : " Mis left g August hand is under my head, for He will not leave me even in Ps. cxiiV. 78 A COMMENTARY ON [II. 6. in temporal needs and desires, but nevertheless the s. Greg. M. left hand will be under my head, not put before it, but beneath it, that His right hand may embrace me, pro- mising me everlasting life. Thus is fulfilled that say- 1 Tim. iv. 8. ing of the Apostle : ' Having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come.' What of that s. Just. Org. which now is ? His left hand is under my head. What of that to come? His right hand doth embrace me. s. Mat. vi. Do ye seek things for time ? ' Seek ye first the king- ^^' dom of God,' that is, the right hand, ' and all these s. Pet. Dam, things shall be added unto you.' Ye shall have, saith Ep. 37. j£g^ riches and glory, and in the world to come life everlasting. With the left hand I will sustain your weakness, with the right I will crown your perfection." Again, the same Saint in another place observes that the right hand is above, the left hand below ; the left In Ps. cxx. for consolation, the right for protection. Our head, that is, our faith, where Christ dwells, rests on the left hand, because we set that faith above all temporal things, and then, truly, the right hand embraces us. Cassiodor. But, writes another Father, even the temporal things here intended are not earthly, rather they are Divine. " God's left hajid -means the pledge of the Holy Spirit, the understanding of the sacred Scriptures, and such Phiio Carp, like gifts and graces whereby Holy Church is com- Beda. forted in the present life. By the right hand is de- noted the blessedness of the Heavenly Country, and by the head the guiding principle of the soul. There- fore the Bridegroom's left hand is under the Bride's head, because the Church receives all these gifts to ^ the end that she may learn to sigh for things eternal. And the right hand of the Bridegroom embraces her, because the whole aim of the Church or of the faithful soul is that she may at length attain everlasting bless- edness, and rejoice in the vision of her Maker. It is well said, therefore, that the Bridegroom's left hand is under the Bride's head, and then that His right hand embraces her, because no one can arrive at the em- braces of eternal bliss, unless he strive to be partaker here of heavenly mysteries and Divine gifts." And Serm. 4, in thus too, more tersely, S.Bernard: "The left hand Nativ. Dom. raises, the left clasps. The left heals and justifies, the right embraces and blesses. In His left hand are merits, in His right rewards. In His right, I say, s. Hieron. 4, delights ; in His left, medicines." Another view sees in zech. jj^ ^j^g i^f^ hand, under the head, as giving a certain i n. 6.] THE SONG OF SONGS. 79 degree of support, the old Law, but in the loving ' embrace of the right the tidings of the Gospel. Again, the left hand is taken to denote punishment and suf- I fering, the right to be blessings and rewards. And in this sense an Eastern Father writes : " His left hand 'rneodoret. I is under my head, that is, I am lifted up above suflPer- I ings, and not pressed down under them, because I am j united to my Bridegroom, and heed Him eagerly. His \ right hand shall embrace me ; that is. He will deck me j with His bounties, and as though embracing, and grasp- ing, and fulfilling my desire, heap me therewith." So j too S. Bernard tells us that when we have attained that s. Bernard, love which casteth out servile fear, God's left hand ^^'^™- ^'• of threatening is under our heads, and we are bold enough, in confident hope, to draw close to that right hand wherein are His promises ; but that when we fear Him more than we love or hope, when dread of wrath to come is our chief sentiment, then His left hand is over our heads. Another, accepting the view Apouius. that the left hand denotes punishment and suffering, applies it in a different and very beautiful way. " The scaflfbld, and torments of divers punishments, seemed to the foolish and ungodly shameful and hateful, but to the Martyrs, and to all who have been brought into the hall of wisdom, to be joyous delights, and beds of rest for the weary. Beds whereon fire rouses only a sportive smile ; whereon the amphitheatre of the tried soul is turned into a paradise, the gratings and frying- pans become the softest feathers, the balls of name turn to the sweetest flowers, melted lead into balmy unguents, the scourges, and rods, and toothed irons, become the most delicate brushes, wherewith the soul, cleansed from every stain of sin, and called back to lier former beauty, is restored to her Creator. For death undergone for Cheist's sake is preferred as more precious than any joy, any pleasure, or the most costly gem. These, then, are the delights of holy souls for winning everlasting joys, where the Church, fainting in delight, is glad of being held in the em- ibrace of Cheist her Beloved, that she may be counted {^worthy to bear the most savage tortures for her Maker.