I y/ % / <> mmmi\ - i-^MÉifcf ■ ' ■hf.iiÙÊi^ft THE L I F E OF L U C 1 LI (alias Julius c/Esar) V A N I'N J; Burnt for Atheism at Thouloufe. WITH An Abftrad of his Writings, • U E I N G The Sam of the Atheiftical Dodrine taken from Plato, Aristotle^ Averroes, Car- DANUs and Pomponatius's PhiloCophy. • ■■ . ' - WITH A Confutation of the fame; and Mr. Bayle'^s Arguments in Behalf of Vanini, comp'leatlji - anfwered. ^ ^.^^ ^C^a^w..^* ^ /^, Trantlated from the Frerich in&o EngliÇ). . LONDON:^ printed' for W. Meadows at the Angel \n Corn- hill. Mdccxxx. CPrice 2 s.) /i^^^^^^^^ ^^W^//^^^ ^^^^^'^^'^ /ai /t-lû/â û'AA^ û-^/fL, — ^/^y^.-^^ , ^.. ^_. _ l/>û:/^tlAf ^, ^cfir/ ^<^ A^ ^ û^.c^^ /^h (uJi^ a.^^ a /W^ ^/?Û'/^^^^^ J Ill T O T H E M 1 R E A D E AKT imdouhtedly ^ill wou" deTy how any "Body tsûould un^ dertake to prite the Life of Vanini -, a Terfon who merits ed rather to he buried in per- pettial OhlioUrine of thofe vulgarly {though wrongfully) called Ifree-Thinkers i I am perfuaded^ I f^ys upon this Confideration^ the necejfity will appear y that thofe FaUs JJmild he repre* /inted '-in a fmr an^ h&neft manner^ to A 2 Vindicate iv To the Reader. mndicate the righteous Caufe from hafe Jfperfions. That this Tiece has all the CharaUers reqiiijite to diftingiiijh its worth and 'va- lue^ the perufal will fufficiently teflify. In it is perceivable an accurate and impar- tial yudgment^ free from all Infimiations or SuppofitionSy that either direUly or confequentially fatmir of prejudice of Edti- cation : Our Author [eems tohe fo cautious of avoiding fuch an Imputation {not only in this^ hut all his other Writings) when an opportunity offers^ or an ohjeUion a- gainji the Chriftian belief falls in his way i that he^ with the great eft imparti- ality illuftrates it^ urging it with the ut- moft Energy and For ce^ to leave the Read- er entirely fatisfied with his reply t and to eradicate compleatly the moft dangerous Œ)ouhts and Terplexities, Vanini in his life time was famous all ever Europe for his fophiflical Writings y which were new and uncommon in their kind^ and particularly adapted to the Tafte of that Jge. T^hey were wrote in a good Latin Style^ and fo artfully con- trived^ that under the pretext of defend- ing Chrift;ianity and Morality^ heflily in- finuated the rankeft atheiftical Trinci- fles^ aiming at nothing lefs^ than to de- ftroy all Religion^ even the Natural not excepted. The HardJJnps he underwent' on that Account^ are by fome cried up for Martyrdom^ To the Reader, Martyrdom, though if we may helie've Gramond, who was then fir ft Trefident of the Parliament of Thouloufe, he would have recanted when he found Sentence of n^eath was pafl on him^ which was re- jeïied^ they knowing him to he a malicious 'ÏDiffemhler, He fet out from Naples with twehe Con-^ federates^ as reprobate as himfelf, to di- fperfe all o^er the Worlds in the manner of the Jp oft les, his pernicious T>oUrine. Ton will find him a Man of Learning, 'very Jmhitious, Stihtle, of an eafy Addrefs^ jomal in Converfation, and full of Spirit and AUi^^ity, which the 'various ard ftir- 'prizing Ad'ventures of his Life fitfficiently teftify ; and endowed with fuch bright na- tural Faculties, that Hiftory can [car ce produce his Equal : 'But as he mif applied his talent, ^ro^idence made him as nO" torious in his ^unijhment ; his Execution being fo terrible that one cannot read it without being Jloock' d. He was a ftaunch T>ifciple of Plato, Ariftotle, Averroes, Cardanus and Pompo- natius, whom he copies e'very where, up" on the Creation, the origin of Man, and ether Matters relating to natural Thilo- phy» But when he quotes ^em, to decide "^in religious Affairs, he is quite ah fur d and ridicidous 'y witnefs the famous Ho- rofcope from Cardan, who pretended to ft ate the nativity of Chrift, thereby to pro've^ yi To the Reader. ^ froije^ that his extraordinary ^atities were not owing to his divine Nature^ tut the Conftellation^ that prevailed at Jois ^irth i which was calculated to fuh- fvert the Chriftian 'Religion. His Writings were numerous ^ as ap- pears from the Catalogue at the end of this Tiece. Mofl of them are lojl^ and thofe that are now remaining^ viz. his Amphitheatre and Dialogues, the Author has taken Care to examine and confute in their ftrongeji Arguments. In Jhort you II fee ^ how the various Syjlems of the chief atheiftical Writers have been af- plied to account mechanically for the miraculous Performances in the Old and New Heftament^andthe ahfurdity offuch Solutions expofed, And^ I may venture to affirm^ yon II find in this Tiece not only Entertainment for the Unlearned^ lui alfo many Obfervations and TraUs mt unworthy the moft Curious, THE THE CONTENTS l. QCcaJîon of the Writing this Piece, Pag. I.' II. 'The Plan intended. 4. III. Vanini*s Country and Parents^ ib. IV. His Study and Teachers. 5. '— His contempt of Thomas Aquinas; 7. V. Received a Prieft. ib. "— His Method of Preaching and his Averroifiical Ladder. S. — Refuted by Mr. de Fontenelle. 9. VI. Studies the Law, ib. VII. His Poverty at Padua praife-ivorthy. 10. VIII. His favourite Authors ^ Ariftotle. ib. — Averroes. 11. — Pomponatius. ib. — Cardanus. 12. — Opinion of the Latter concerning the Immor- tality of the Soul. 13 — Softened by Mr. Bayle. ib.' •— Opinion of Pomponatius on the fame SubjeB» 16. •— Mr. Bayle's Opinion of thefe tiw AutÏMS better than that of Vân[n\. 18. <-^ If lue fometimes attack what we feign to believe, 19' IX. Vanini begins his impious Apcfilefiip. ib. — If he made it Publick at Thouloufe. 20. X. His feigned and true Voyages. 11. — He cenf tires the Schifms ftibfifling between Chrijiians. 2 1 . r- Vanini's Jbe C O "NT EUT S: — Vânmi s falfe Courage at Geneva. Pag. 22. XI. Merry I'hought they have of that l'ovin in Spain. ib. XII. He goes to England, "where he is imprifoned for forty nine Days. 23. XIII. Every where miflrufted on account of his A- verroifm. 24. XIV. Becomes a Fryar^ and difhonours that State after a deteflabte manner. aj. XV. He cometh to Paris, where he corrupts many People. ' 16. — Idea that Garaflfe gives us of Vanini's Cm- verfation. z6\ XVI. He is made Almoner to the Marshal Baf- fompiere. ib. XVII. Becomes fufpeSled by his IVritings, which the Sorbonne condemns to be burnd. ib. XVIII. Retires to Thouloufe. 2^. XIX. Imprudence 0/ Vanini and ContradiElions of the Libertines. ib. XX. T'he T'efiimony of Gramond and Borri- chius. 30-' — 'The authentick ABf of the Prccefs are want^ ing. _ 31. XXÎ. Writings of Vanini. 32. -T- A merry WifJo of his, he would have been a Bafiard. 3 3. — Feigns to be Ortliodox as other ^Libertines do^ XXII. A general view of his Amphitheatre. 37.- • — Opinion of the Learned about that Book. ib. — That of the Author. 38; The Preface is Vain-Gkrioiis.^ ib. XX.111. He attacks the Esijlence of a principal and intelligent Mover. 35?. "XlvlV. He dtfues the Deity in order to dejlroy his Esiftcuice. 40. XXV. An I The C O N T E N T s. XXV. An Anfwer to that Definition. Pajr. 41. XXVI. A cool Cenfure of Vanini*J cmam'nig vùhat is faidy That the Mercy of the Lord is above all his Works. 4?. XXVII. T'he Horofcope^ or a Calculation of the Nativity of the Chriflian Religion made by Cardanus. 44. ■ ■ ' ■ Looked tipon by Vanini as dangerous, 48. XXVIII. A Refutation of that Calculation, ib, XXIX. Vanini is the fir ft Author among the Mo- derm of the Manichean Objedions. 50. ■ "" To which he anfwers upon Spinofa'j Prin- ciples, ib. XXX. He makes God the Author of Sin. 5 r. • Laughs at Predeftination. ib. XXXI. And at Chrift'j Miracles; 52. ' Refuted on that SubjeB. ib. XXXII. He is merry about Hell. 53. XXXIII. He is an Hypocrite in his Amphithea- tre, "which he defpifes in his Dialogues. ib. XXXIV. A view of his Dialogues, their Ap- probation. 54. ■ The Dedication beggarly and flattering. 55. ^ Comparifons drawn from the Sun already in Vogue in Vanini'j Days. ib. XXXV. "the Preface and Encomium. 5<5'. XXX VI. the Plan of the Book. jy. XXXVII. Atfirftfeems to be a Materialift. 59. >■> » ■■ He believes the form of the Heaven to be its Sculj and concludes for the Eterni- ty of the World. ib. — Attributes that belief to the Ancient Phi- lofophers. 60. — — Deifies Nature though he efleems it dtfordsr- ed. 60. Q ^ysats \ The C O N T E N T s. ^r~*^!'^^^^ Religion as a human Invention. ?,6u XXXVIII. A fhort Refutation of that Syftem h Mr. Barnard. 62. XXXIX. Origin of Mankind according to Di- odorus Siculns and Vanini. dg.' Idle Notions of the Atheifis on that Subject. 6^. Ifthefiyfi Meniuent on All four. 65. A Remarkable Cafe of a young Man ardong the Bea-s. eo, XL. Profanatimof Vanini about our firfl: Parents. ^ ib. XL. I. His odious Paralel between the Empire of God and that of the Devil. 67. ■ Beautified and llluftrated by Mr, Bayle. 68. XLII. A Refutation of faid Paralel 69. XLIII. Vanini'j Jefts concerning the Immortali- ty of the Soul. -71. '—Defence of the German Nation. ib. XL,! V. He Cenfures the Law 0/ Mofes. 72. XLV. And the Chriftian Religion. 73. •! And its Martyrs. jb. " And Marriages. ib. ' T'he Idea he gives us of Anti-Chriftî 73.- — - And 0/ Jefus-Chrjft. 74. ^^ ^«^ 0/?/;^ Eucharift. ib. XLVI. And of the Affiles about the gift of ^^ J^ongues. ib. XL\ n. And of the RefurreEîion. 76. • And of Socrates. 77. ' Wickednefs of the atheiflical Conjectures. XLVIIL He attacks the DoBriue of Devils. 78.' 1 — And of the Pagan Oracles: 7^. rr— A flmt account of the different Opinions concern- ing thofe : And that of Chryfippus. ib. — Qf The C N T E N T s. ,— . of Cicero and Lucian- Pag. 80. Of the Primitive Chriftians. ib. — Of Vanini and Father Tomafin. ib. of Mr, Vandale and Mr- de Fontenelle. 81. — of Father Baltus. ib. XLIX Opinion of Vanini concerning the Periodi- cal Returns he attributed to Religions. 82. -»— Converfation of the Author with Mr. Bayle, .8 5 . — 'That Libertines contradiEl themfehea, 84. -— - As doth fome times Mr. Bayle. ib.. L. The Idea Vanini gives us of Time. 85. LI. The Prophane conclufîon of the Dialogues. ib. — IVhere he laughs at the Fame of Paradife,Pur- gacory and Hell, and ends with a luxurious regret. 8(5. LII. Vanini'j Condemnation related by Gramond, in which he is defcrihed as an Acheift, 87. ■=— A Seducer of Youth. ib. — Prieft and Debauched. ib. > Hypocrite and Prophane. 88. •— Afterwards a Bigot, and Orthodox, through Fear. . 8p. — And afterward difcovering himfelf, is a Blafplicmer againfl Jefus Chrifl:. 5)0. LIII. Tl e FaB otherwife related by the French Mercury. 92, •— - The Relation of Gflrafïè, more conformable to that of Gramond, and confequently more probable. See the Advert if ement at the Be- ginning of the Book. p^. LIV. A CharaSler of Vanini deduced from what hxs been related of him^ his Body and Mind. 5?4. —— ///V Erudition audVov^ny, ib. His Hypocrify and Pride. 96. •—— His Profanations and Criticifms. 97. He ciiliuJates his own Narivity. 5>8. — — His Morals. ib. Mr- The C O N T E N T s. — — Mr. La Croze*i" Judgment cênceming his Re- cantations. Pag. 99* — — Rigour of the Parliament, and Gramond'/ Severity. loo. •— — Vanini*i"laft Hours dreadftill. ib. LV. Concerning the Latin Apology, luhich appear- ed in favour of that Atheifl. ib. LI V. Mr. Bayle'i negleSis concerning him as well in Relation to the Fads as to the Argu- mentacion. loj. THE LIFE O F LUC IL 10 VANINI To Mr. * * * * . Work. I R, O U do me more Honour than The Occa- I defervcj when you ask me a- Jj",°^ ^^*' gain for what I had coUeded concerning Lucilio Vanini's Life. You remember that fince the Year 1710, I was to have continued l^HiJiohe des Ouvrages des Saz'anSj which Work was always interrupted by the learned Diftradions of the Author, and finally flopped by his laft 111 nefs ; and by the Occupations of his Brother f, who had faftained f Mr. Bafnage, Miniftcr of the IrenchChmch. at the Hagm» made feveral Abrtrafts for his Brother the Advocate, who fell ill in 1709. B that 2 The Life of LucilioVaninî. that Burthen from time to time, and would no longer be troubled with it. I had then collected fome Materials for the Continuation of a Work which deferved my whole Attention, when Pro- vidence called me from your City to Amflerdam ; and a few Months after from Amfterdam to England. Among thofe Materials defigned for the ^^*^^^ Journal, you had heard me fpeak of a Latin Kini, by Book printed in Germany, under the Title of Mr.Schram* The Life and Writings of the famous Atheifl Julius C^sar Vanini ; wherein the Au" thor treats of his Birth^ his Behaviour, his Edu^ cation, and of his tragical End; the Whole taken from his Writings, or other Authors worthy of Credit» I made an Abftraât of that Book, and being àt Work about it, I often wi(hed to fee with my own Eyes, the ftrong and weak Side of Vanini, I mean by reading all his Works. By good Luck I found them in your Library, you was pleafed to lend them me, I read them from one end to the other, and I made ufe of *em to give my Abftrad all the Certainty required from a faithful Journalifl-. I read my MS. to fome of my Friends, who approved it j I do not now remember, if I did not (hew it, to you likewife. Be that as it will, having fince left your City, and Mr. Mcrtier, for whom I was to have continued at Amfterdamj les Nouvelles des la Republique des Letres, being dead, my Ab- flrad was banilhed among my old Papers. * De Vita et Scriptis famofi Athei Julii Cxfaris Vanini traiiatus finguUris, in quo Genius, o> Mores (^ StuJia cum ipfa Morte horrendu à Scriptis fuis rnrtoribus (^ alUs fd* dignis Authoribtis feleHa funt, ©•, ne cui ojfevdiculo forent, trmrtt iltiMs fimul funt refutati, à Johanne Maurlcio Schramm. Cuflrini, Typ. (^ fumpt. Godofrcdi Heioinchii, Rej^ii RtgtH, Neo-March, T)'pographi, 1709. A ^he "Life ^j/LucilioVawini. 5 A new Book , which appeared the Year Ux.it u following, did not at all encourage me to take^"/'.* it from thence. Mr. de la Crofe publithed his °^ ' Entertainments upon divers SubjeHs of Hiftory, Literature , Religion and Criticijm *. The fourth of his Entertainments is A Dijfertation upon Atheifm, which is well worth reading. He fpeaks there of feveral Atheifts, and Vanini is introduced in his turn. I muft own I was a little difpleafed when I read that Partage of his Differtation, becaufe it feemed to me, that the Author had compiled there with pretty good Judgment, the chief things to be known concerning that Infidel, and taken from me Materials, which I thought the more entertaining and curious, becaufe no one had ever given us any thing in French upon that Subjeàt. I condemned therefore my MS. to remain where I had put it, and it was going to rot there at Eafe, if you had not asked me for it again in your laft Letter. I (houid yet refufe it you by a Principle of Modefty ; but the Friendfhip and Obligations I owe you, will not permit it. I chufe rather to revife my MS. to reform it, to correct and even to augment it, than to difappoint you a fécond time, Befides, Mr. de la Crofe has omitted feveral im- portant Remarks, which 1 have fupplied, and perhaps fome will rather read Vani ni's Life, in a little Volume by itfelf, than in the middle of a tedious DilTertation, Afcer all. Sir, you are Mafter of the MS. read it with fome Atten- tion, and if it doth not pleafe you, do with ic as they did with Van i n i j I atfure you I (hall not take it ill in the leaft. * The Book is printed at Amflerdumy by Koger. 17 ii. B 2 2. I ^. I'he Life of JLv cilio Van i n i. II, I fiiall divide into five or fix Articles, all what I have to tell you about our Neapolitan. I fhall at firft fpeak of his Birth, and his Parents, then of his Learning and Prxceptors ; after- wards of his Travels, then of his Writings, and of the Impiety hid in them, which dil- covers itfelf by Degrees; and conclude with his tragical Death, and a View of his Charader, in oppofition to the Apologies of his Advocate, * and the carelefsnefs of a celebrated Au- thor, who in his Penfees Sur la Comète ^i^ has cried up our Vanini for an honeft Man and a true Martyr of Atheifm : This laft Ar- ticle will perhaps be curious enough. And this is the Method I intend to obferve in this Let' ter : I with you may not have Reafon to repent your Curioficy, nor 1 my Complaifance. Vamni"? III. LuCILIO V A N I N I, waS bom ûtTllU- Birrh, his ynfaito § in the Kingdom of Naples^ and not cïmr ^^ Naples itfelf, as all the Editions of Moreno andPaients.-D?^'''"^'.)' intimate, not even excepting the laft by M. Du Pin**. I place his Birth in the Year 1585, and not 1579, as by an overfight Mr. la Croje has done. The Day and Month are not lînown, and I guefs only at the Year, from a Paffage of his Dialogues upon Nature, where our Infidel makes Alexander his Admirer fay to him, you are hardly thirty Years old, and you have ' enriched the Publick already with I do not know * M. Arpe. Apohgid pro Julio C&fure Vmini, Neapolitano. Cofmopoli. Typis Philaletheis. 1 7 1 1 . :}: Tome i. P«g- 3J"<). C?> fnivuntes de Pelttion de 1704. § 'Tis himfe.f tl.at acquaints us of it in the j-6th Dia- • loguc, pag. 41+. fgo cum Tawifanum patriam mea>;nobiliJp'- m-vn (^ ve'.ut in orbis aj.nulo gemmam, petcrem. Mr. Je le Cro,e calls it the City Tauri;.-mo ; but I find no fuch City in tlie Map?, hut a Market Town of that Name, a rew Leagues from C'flro •* The Edition of 5- Vol. Fol 1713. how I n'he Life (p/ !> u c i l i o V a n i n i. f hoxv many illuftrious Monuments of Learning, which have acquired you a great deal of Ho- nour i ïhofe Dialogues having been printed ac Paris in 1616, it is probable, if he lays true, that he came into the V/orld towards the end of 15S5, or the beginning of the Year following. His Fathers Name was 'yohn Bapn(ia Frt«/«?', His father! Steward to Don Francis de Caflro, Duke of T'aii^ Yofano, Viceroy of Naples, and afterwards Am- ba(ïaâour 0Ï Spain to the Court of /Jowe». His His Mo- Mother was called Beatrix Lopes de Nogueray^^^^' ^ and if we may believe her Son, who omits nothing to make himfelf efteemed, (he was of a Spanifh Family of Diftindion. I would not re-.^"^^^"* late here what he tells us of his Father, if itcumftance did not give us to underftand how much Va- of his Fa- nity and Puerility there was in the Genius of*^^"'^ our Atheift. He fays that his Father * be-"°"'^- ing near his End, and the Phyficians having acquainted him with it, (liewcd fuch a De- fire for an immortal Life exempt from all Lan- guifViing and Slothfulnefs, that he arofe imme- diately from his Bed, pronouncing thefe Words of Vefpajtan^ it doth not behove me to die any otherivife than fianding. As if a Saying did not loofe of its Elegancy in paffing from the Mouth of an Emperor into that of a Steward or Farmer. His Son, being born, was called Lucili o,HisCInfti- but he became too arrogant to be contented ^n Name, with an ordinary Name, and we fhail foon fee how he was induced to take up another §. IV. He was a great lover of Learning from HisSmdies. his Infancy, and applied himfelf to it to flic h :|: Dial. 424. * Amphit. p. if^. Vid. Swton. in Vefpnj-an. Cap 24. § Gitrafe iays, That " the miftrable Lucilio changed his "Name three or four times, according to the Country " for ^ ' The Life of l,vciLio Vanini. fuch a Degree, that it foon filled him with Prefumption. His Father fent him to Rome, to ftudy there Philofophy and Divinity: His Mafter was a certain Carmelite Fryer, called B. Argottl^^^^^^^^^'^ ^ygott^, who at that time was very famous. Vanini brags of it very much in his Works J he teils us of his Wifdom, and of his fedate Behaviour, and cries him up for a Phœnix of the Preachers of his time \. In the fame manner he mentions another Carmelite, J. Bacon, called John Bacon, an Ornament fays he, to the Averroist's, formerly my Praceptor, and of "juhom 1 have learned to fxuear by none but A v E R. - ROES. This he tells us in his Amphitheatre § ; a fine ExprefTion for an Author, who propofes there to refute the antient and modern A- theifts ! vanmiRu- From Rome he returned to Naples^ accord- and Aftro-^"^ to Mr. Schramm*s Conjedure **, where he logy. continued his Study of Philofophy. He de- lighted much in Natural Philofophy, and out of loveforthatScience, he applied hinifelf fome time to Phyfick^ which is one of its Branches. Aftro- nomy alfo imploy'd him confiderably, which infenfibly flung him into the Whimfies of Af- trologers. But he beftowed beft part of his *' for beinp in Gafcony he called himfelf Pompeio, and among " the Nobility he was known by no other Name. In Holland •' his Name was JuUui C£far: When he was about printing •' his Book at Paris he ftiled himfelf Jolio dfure Vanino ; " and piinting his Amphitheatrum at Lyons, he added to it " Taurifctno; and at Tholofe, when he was tried, he was " called Sieur Lucilto. Garas. Do£t. Cur. p. 1014, + Dial. p. lOf. Virum optimum ^ fapitnujjîmum. § P. 17. Dtice Averroc, m cujus verba jurare ^«w'Joan- ncs Baccontus, Averroiftarum princeps meritijjimus, olua^ f im£ brutae dux. Vegetans 2c Sentirus; 8c fjper has potior Lntclle&ns, minor In- ietJ'gentiis. Etenim in materia exiflens immaterialis, iêd à materia icparabilis 5 fcparatus per effentiam, non fcparatuspcr informacionem. Did. p. 254., Proteftants The Life ^/ L u c i l i o V a n i n f * g Proreftants have adopted Plato\ Scale, after what Mr. Fontenelle has faid of it, to fliew forth its Invalidity. " Some are mightily em- barrafl'ed about the infinite Space, which is between God and Human Creatures (fays that bright Man) and they fill it up with Cf/ww/sand Damons ; but with what (hall be filled up that infinite Space there is between God and thofe Genius's and Demons? For the diflance from God to any Creature whatever, is infinite. As it is neceflary, in a manner of fpeak- ing, for God's Adion to traverfe an infi- nite Vacuwn to reach thofe Dccmom, it might as well come at once to Men, fince they are but a few Degrees diftant from them, and there is no proportion at all to the *' firft Diftance. When Ccd treats with Men by means of Angels, that is not to fay, ** that Angels are neceflary for this Com- munication, as Plato pretended ; God employs them for Reafons, which Philofophy will ne- " ver be able to difcover *'\ Neverthelefs our Vanini would penetrare every thing, and that in his Sermons, Averroes held there St. Paul and St. Thomas's Place. It is true the Hearers did not comprehend much of it ; but that was to them a reafon for ap- proving his Difcourfe ; for many People readily facrifice their Reafon to the found offomehard Words and obfcure Terms. VI. Now our Vanini wanted nothing but He fludics the Study of the Law, to give his Learning ^'^^ .^^^^ that Air of Univerfality, which fo many Men ^^^^^^ are fond of. He calls himfelf DoElor in utrcqiie Jure, in the Title Page of his Dialogues, and • Fontenelle Hift. des Oracles. Ch, vi. p. 74. C it lo Ibe Life ofLv CIL lo VANiNié it appears indeed, that he was not a Novice in the Civil Law, nor even the Canonical. His ftay at VII. From Naples he went to Padua, where pW«»,andthe goodnefs of the Air, the foftnels of the his laudable Qjj^^j.g^ and efpecially the Converfation with ^^^^ ^' Men of Letters, detained him fome Years. He there repeated all the Sciences which he had run over, and although extreamly poor, he ftudied with all the Ardour which a Difpofition hot of it Self, and moreover inflamed by a pro- digious Ambition, can furnilh. All is ivarm, * lays he, to thofe that love ; have I not fuftained at Padua the greatejl Frofl in Winter vsith a poor and thin Drefs, animated only with a Defire of Learning ? He fays in his Amphitheatre, that having finiftied his Studies in that City, he found • himfelj in a Capacity to go through all Europe, t(î niijit the Univer/îties and afftjl at the Ajfemhlies and Conferences of the Learned \. He boafts afterwards that he had done it and perfected himfelf in all kind of Learning. HisFavou- Viil. His favourite Authors were Aristotle, rite All- » thors, AvERRoES, Cardan and roMPOiNA tius. Thofe Names are fufRciently known ; M. Bayle has given us a faithful pourtrait of them in his Critical DiEîionary, and it may be fufficienc here to obferve in what Efteem our V a n i n i held them. Arijlotk. As to Ariftotk, that went even to Admiration ; he calls him the God of Phi/ofophers , ** The DiBator of human IVifdoJU , and the Sovereign Pontiff of the Sages. He owns that he devoted himfelf entirely to him, and that he had him continually in his Hands, before his Eye?, and * Dial, p. 35-Î. 4: See the Preface of his Amphitheitre. ** Dc Amirand, Natur. Arcan. Dial. 1 1 . in 1 Ihe Life ^/ L u c i l i o Va n i n i. i i in his Mind. He borrows from him in feveral Places, without naming him, and if it was worth while, I could eafily make ic appear, that he is not the Inventor of all thofe notable Inquiries into the Myfteries of Nature, which he rccails with fo much Oftentation, and about which Alexander is introduced admiring him, as if they were all new Difcoveries. The Syftem of Averroes, which is but a Branch of that of Artjiot/e, was fo much to his liking, that he took care to recommend this Au- thor to his Difciples in their beginning, and even when they had no Tinfture of Philoibphy at all. He himfelf acquaints us with this Particularity, in his Dialogues jf. I0:jen the Btifinefs was, fays he, fpeaking of one of his SchoIar5, to initiate him in the Myfleries of Philofophy^ I took great Care, that he fwore to no ones Name ; / con- tented my felj "With putting into his Hands Aver- R G E s's Books J iiéich he read with fuch Grcedinefs^ and by which he profited fo much, that hefocn took upon him to confute the Impertinencies of the Schclafticks, who talk fiiperficially upon Matters. PoMPONATius, a famous Averroist, had left behind him at Padua, many Followers and feveral Writings. Our Van i ni read them greedily, and confirmed himfelf foon in the fame Sentiments. Mr. Schramm believes c,./;.,^„,., V A N I N I had ftudied under Pompona- Miftakc. tius at Bottlogna * , and that they had feen each other ; but he doth not take Notice that Pofnponatius was born in 1452, and that Vanani died in 1615?, but 34 Years old accord- ing to my Calculation. Be that as it will, he calls him always his Divine Mafler, Divinum ff Amphith. p. 7,^0. * Schramm de Vita & f'criptis Van'mi. ^. i-j, C 2 i'i'^- [li ^be Life ofLv ciLio Y A iJi mi Praceptorent^ and beflovvs great Enccmiums upon his Works f. The Book where he treats iibout Enchamments, and which was looked upon as a dangerous one, feemed to him a Golden Treatife : Liber aureus. 'Another about Defliny charmed him, and a third about Caufes and Natural Efteds, deferved alfo his higheft Ad- miration. In fliort he had hardly any Doubt left, but the Soul of Averroes had tranfmigra^ ted into Pomponatius'i Body {*). ^T r"^' Cardan is alfo one of thofe Authors, whom he was a Va N I N I had ftudied much. He praifes him Fooioran and finds fault with him in feveral Places. In Atheift? Qj-je place, he gives him the Character of a Man of great Senfe, and giving little Credit to Su- perftirion tf. Naude doth not agree to the firft Article, for he maintains that he was perfcdly ftupid ; which appears fufiîcientiy from his own Writings, when he relates the Tranfadions of his Life. Mr. Eayle, a Man of a clear Under- ftanding, finds in him rather the Character of a Superfticious Man, than of an Atheift, and he agrees with Naude, that Cardans chief Chara- cter was Folly **', of which, as he pleafantly ex- prefifes it, his Underllanding could pais for no- thing but an Appendix. And truly how can a Man like Cardan (who out of a finpid Ingenuity owns himlelf guilty of the moft heinous and difagreeable Vices, without excepting even that of Proplianation) pa fs ior one in his Senfes with thofe who have preferved theirs §. t Divinus Pracccptor in Aurco opufcuio dc incantationibus. Dial. p. 574. * Amphit.DiJfertat.Vl.^. ;6. -f-f Dial. p. 105. 204. ** See Dift. Cm. The Article 0^ Cxrdan. § Idem ibid. Another I I'he Life ^/ L u c i l i o V a n i n i. 13' Another Folly ; Cardan and Pompoimtius had CarJan borh writ upon the Immortality of the Souî, and 5^"^,^°^/vc oppofed it when they feemed to ellablifliit. Pom- both writ pouatiui began it, and made himfelf many Ene-onthelm- mies, by advancing this very delicate Propofition, "1°^ § ^1 njiz,. That fince it was impoflible to prove it by Natural and Philofophical Realbns, the fureft way was to have recourfe to Revelation f. Cardan maintained the fame thing, and copied PQ7nponatius. Thefe two uniform Treatifes up- on the fame Matter, gave them a very bad Repute ; and the truth of the Matter is, thac they did not manage their Orthodoxy with any Condud. They are not contented to attack there the Spirituality and Immortality of our Souls, by the Principles oï Ariftotle's Philofophy ; but alfo defend Atheifts, as being honeft Men, whofe dilinterefted Virtue is more Praife- worthy, than that of the moft couragious De- fenders of the Immortality. Some would hav^e advanced in our times, that Atheifm is not worfe than Idolatry ; I do not know if they have not flopped there, becaufe they dared not go any farther. Cardan being bolder, made the Scales to turn in Favour of Atheifm ; the Paf- fage is fo remarkable, that I cannot help tran- flating it here, io much the rather becaufe Mr. Bayle has not quoted it, to my Knowledge, in the Continuation of his Various Thoughts upon Comets, " Let us nojv fee ^\, fays he, whe- " ther the Belief of Immortality makes Men " more virtuous and happy. As for my part, *' I do not perceive it contributes any thing *' towards it. We fee in Cicero and Diogenes " LaertiuSy that the Epicureans were more up- f See D;c?. Hifîor. c? Critic. The Article of Vomponatius. ^*ir Cardanus De immortal, anim. Cap. 2. foi. j;?. ': riche [r4 ^he Life ofLvcitio Vanini. *' right and honeft, and had more true Good- *' nefs towards Men, than the Stoicks or Pla~ *' tonkks. The Reafon is, if I miftake nor, *' what Galen advances, that Men grow good or " bad by Cuftom\\. But no Body crufts them " who make no Profeffion of an unlhaken Up- *' righteoufnefs ; and therefore they are obliged *' to obferve more their Honour than others, *' and to prove themfelves fuch to the Publick, " for fear Men (hould think their Praôices *' are according to their Sentiments. Hence it " is that few Men now a-Days equal the Faith ** of Ufurers ; which otherwife lead a very " bad Life. Let it be obferved alfo, that the *' Sect of PharifeeSy who believed in the Re- " furredion and Immortality of the Soul, never " ceafed profecuting J4^s thrift i and that the ** SaduceeSj another Seel, which rejeâed both " thefe Articles, attacked him but very feldom, *' once or twice at moft, and in fuch a Manner " that it caufed him no great Uneafinefs. A- ** gain, if you compare the Lives of Pliny and " Seneca, their Lives I fay, and not their Words, " you will find that Pliny with his Belief of " the Mortality of the Soul, furpafles Seneca *' in his moral Behaviour as much, as he Pliny '* in his Difcourfe upon Religion and Virtue. *' The £/'/V«^^^»J' cultivated Honefty, they en- " tertained very officioufly the Children of their " Pupils, and maintained at their Charges the " Families of their dcceafed Friends. They *' were looked upon every where as honeft " Men, altho they did not regard much the ** Worihip of the Gods, and denied their Ex- +f Thar contradids his Principle, proving the Inequality of the Sefts. j0ence T^he Life ^/LucilioVani n-i. 15 " iflence very ftrongly*". It happens alfo from " that flattering Opinion of another Life, that the Wicked have room to exert their PafTions ; the Good fuftcr many things contrary to the Welfare of Society ; and the Laws fuftain " a confiderable Shock, in as much, as upon Confideration of ReHgion, they are foftened " to fuch a Degree that often the very Foundation of the Publick Good, and the Eafe of Man- kind hes at Stake. Neither doth it feem to me, that this Belief of Immortality, makes Men more couragious. For Byutus was no more fo than Cafftus ,• and if we will fay the Truth, the Actions of Brutus were rather *^ more cruel than thofe of Caffius. For the laft " treated the /^/;0(i/'«»j, altho* great Enemies of the '* righteous Caufe, in a more favourable man- *' ner, than Brutus had done the Cities where he commanded, and which were in Alliance " with him. And laftly, what (hall we fay ? *' Is it not Brutus f the fame Brutus the Stoick, ** who delivered the Republick into Anthony's " Hands, becaufe he had faved it to no pur- *' pofe, altho' according to Law ,• after Caffius " had refcued it by his good Condud". I have copied the whole Paflage for feveral Reafons, Firft, to make Cardans Character known, and the Value one ought to put upon his Writings, and efpecially upon that about the Immortahty of the Soul. Secondly, to expofe Vam'ms Cha- rader at the fame time, who retails thofe very Thoughts in his Dialogues, and no Doubt ap- proves themf. Thirdly, to make it appear that the Paradoxes which have been lately vented a- * They did not deny it abfolutely, but only ftammered upon this Article. Epicurnm Balbutientem. Dtnatttra Deorum. + Dial, p. 3z8. broad, 1 6 The Life of L ir c i l i o V A n i N i. broad, and the Examples alledged to that Pur- pofe, are not fo new as fome may imagine. And laftly, to have an Opportunity of (hew- ing our Acknowledgment to Mr. Bayle^ for thac being fupported by many Reafons, furniftied him by Cardan^ he yet was honeft enough to keep an even Balance between Religion and A- theifm ; maintaining againft the Italian Philofo- pher, that it was not true that Religion had done more harm than good in the World, as he exprefies himfelf in SeBion 131, of h\s various T'houghtSy &c. He believes even that Religion in- fpires more Courage than Atheifm ; for lays he in the fame Place, With Cardan s Leave : A Society of Atheijls^ as being incapable of adminiflring to each other Motives of Religion to make them coura- geous^ coud en fier be difperfed than a Society of Men that ivorjhip fome Deity. Behold here two famous Authors in a Contradidion about the Power of the Influence of Atheifm ! This is not a proper Place to examine thefe Sentiments ; let it fuffice that we have juftified in Part the Judgment of Mr. Naudé upon Cardans Philofo- phy, one of tlie great Matters of our Vanini, Pomponatius had alieady treated upon the fame Topick. I (hall quote here fome Pieces out of his Book of the Immortality of the Soul^ by which you may judge of the reft '*. He is very well perfuaded that the Dodrine of the Immortality of the Spirits, doth not difpofe Men to be wicked, and that (ince they naturally love Fe- licity and hateMifery ; to make them honeft it fuffices to îhew them, that the Happinefs of Lije conjifts in the PraSiice of Virtue^ and Mifery in the PraEîice of Vice. He addsy that thofe who inculcate Mortality of the Soul, open a M^ay to the mofl per- * See Di<5t. Hift. Crit. Article, Pomponatius. fen 7>&^ i/f^ (?/ LuciLio Vanini. 17 fe^ Virtue^ which is that which hath not in T/tevi any Recompenfe or Chaflifement. He a/fu fays, that thofe Men are brutal^ to whom the Immrtaliiy of the Soul muft be propofed as a Bribe : And that probably there arefome Authors who have taught that DoSIrine, •without believing it themfelves, and ufed that Stra^ tagem to re/train the jenfual Inclinations of brutal Minds *. All thofe Remarks, adds Mr. Bayle, do not remove the Difficulty. But here is a more reafonable Thought, founded upon Fafts. He fays, that a great Number of zvicked People Relieve the Im?nortality of the Souly and that many Saints andjufiMendo not believe it. Here is the whole Pafl-ige which Mr. Bayle has not tranfla- ted. " And it is not generally true that they are debauched People, who eftabliih the Mor-» *' tality of the Soul ,• neither is it true, they are '* all wife Men who believe the Immortality : For " it is evident that abundance of ill Livers have " Faith, but are led aitray by their Paffions ; *' and on the contrary we know for certain, that " a great Number of wife and juit Men held " the Mortality of the Soul. Plato tells us in " the firft Book of his Repuhlick, that the Poet ** Sirnomdes, an excellent and divine Man in all *' Refpeds, was of that Number. Homer ^ *' accoiûi.ig to Ariftotle's Obfervation in his *' Treatife upon the Soul Ch, 2. made no Diftin- « *' dion betwixt Senfe and Underftanding : And *' who is ignorant of Horner s Merit ? HippO" ^' crates and Galen^ Perfons whofe Probity was *' no ways inferior to their Knowledge, were *' of the fame Opinion. Alexander Avhrodifeus^ *' the great Alfarabus, Abubacer, Avempacius, • Thefe^'are Mr. Bayle i Words, Dift. Hift. Sc Crit. Art,' D V and 1 8 ^he Life of L u c 1 1, i o V a n i iî t. " and among the reft Plinius and Seneca, and *' many others, are not far from this Sentiment". Seneca in his 54th Epiftle, Lib. VII. fays in plain Terms, that the Soul is mortal. And he ex- prefles himfelf yet clearer in his Epiftle to Mar- cia, where he fpecifies the Names of a great . Number of other learned Men, who believed the fame f. Here it appears, how Cardan and Mr. Bayle do not agree about the influence of Atheifm : Be- fides, Pomfonatius does not hold the fame with Cardan concerning Seneca. Cardan^ makes him a Stokk and a good Orator, but not a very honeft Man : Pomponatius miakes an Epicurean of him, in point of the Mortality of the Soul, and yet a very good Man. However thofe three Au- thors, Cardan, Pomponatius and Bayle, agree in this Point ; that Atheifm does not make Men worje than they luould be vtherways. Now that Cardan and Po7nponatius were profefled Infidels, notwith^ ftanding their preliminary Proteftacions in thofe ^* -, , two Treatifes, is ftrenuoufly denied by Bayle ; IjJa beJfej. and indeed natural Equity demands that we Opinion of fliould fufpend our Judgment upon Circumftan- themthan (.gg only, unlefs by manifeft Prophanations Au- civanim. ^^^^^ ^^^ off the Mask, as Vanini and o- thers have done. Vanini is not fo equitable as Bayle, towards the two Italians juft now men- tioned. Pomponatius and Cardan'^', fays he, ivere Men full of Knoijûledge and Learning. T'hey ivere fo little dijlant from my Sentiments, that each of them has given us a Treatife on the Immortality of the Soul. I own ingenuoufly, I don't know as yet their Sentiments upon that Head and the ?nanner in which they have exprejfed themfelves, for thofe two Books -J- Vo77)ponat. De immortalitate anime, p. 119. "^ Amphit. Dillèrtat. 28. are The Life ^/LucilioVanini. ig {ire not yet come to my Hanà^^ my have they ap- peared at the Fairs of Franckfortr, or in the Shops of our Lutheran and Cahkiift Bookfdllers. After all, I do not knozv, ij they have not done as Agrip- pa, "who has compofed fo many Books about the evo- cation and conjuration of Dsemons, although that arch Knave * believed nothing cf it, after the Ex- ample of all thofe Necromancers ^ who impcfe en the Vulgar. See the firft Book De vanitate Scien- tiarum, and the beginning of every Volume, where Agrippa openly denies the Exiftence of Damons. Thus our Atheift furniHies us defignedly with a Key to his pernicious Works. That Me- thod of attacking, when one i^^ems to defend, is not new. Carneades ufed it fometimes : Ci- cero did as much in his philofophical Books; Agrippa has imitated them; Cardan and Pom- ponatius are come fince j and our Vanini has taken a model from them in his Diflertations and Dialogues. By the privilege of Hiftory, I (hould name here him, who with a greater Talent and more light than thofe Itali/ins, has built upon all the others ; but as he is one of your Heroes, and the Opinions of Men are divided into the different Views they have af- figned him; you would perhaps never forgive me, if I put his Name in the Lift with Car- dan, PomponatiuSj &c. IX, Vanini having fini(h*d his Studies, re- v^^nhi un- turned into his native Country, viz.. to Tau- ^^^^^}:^î^^ rofanOy probably to regulate his Aftairs, and ^° ^ '^ to put himfelf in a lituation of commencing his Miffion. To that end, after he had done * See Bayle's Di6t. Hift. Crit. Article Agrippa MeUnch' ton in his Letter to Count d'Erbach calls him Sorcerer. Ep. lin. S. p, 1 1. D 2 hisL 30 T^he Life of "Lv c it lo Va n i n t, his Bulinefs, he returned to Naples, and 'twas, there, as it is fuppofed, he formed the ftrange Defign of going with thirteen of his Compa- nions to fpread in the World his Atheifm. Some pretend even, he ovvn'd this at Thou- loufe before the Parliament. P. Marfenne re- lates it in his Commentary upon Genefis, where he refutes Vanini\ Impieties. " Before he wa? *' executed at T'hotiloufe^ he confefied before " the whole Affembly of the Parliament, that " at Naples, he and thirteen others, had re- " lolved to go through the whole World, to *' fow the Dodrine of Atheifm, and that '* France, had fell to his Lot. An impious *' Apoftlefhip, adds Marfenne, which he exe- *' cuted but too well at Paris and in other " Places. * I quote this Circumftance, becaufe it comes from a grave Author; but I do not think it probable for two Reafons, Firft, fuppofing the Faft to be true, that Vanini, to turn the Gofpel into ridicule, had ntfeded an Apoftle- fhip of that Nature, I cannoc think he would have own'd it in an abfolute Court of Juftice, which could aggravate his Punifhment ; unlefs one fuppofes, it was but a few Minutes before Execution, when he faw there was no hopes left for him. But Father Marfenne adds, he made that CcnfclHon publlckly before all the Judges. Was all the Parliament in a Body to accompany him to the place of Execution ? That is not likely at all. The other Realbn is, that Gramoifid, who was upon the Place, and befides, firft Prefidcnt of the Parliament, fays nothing of if, neverthelefs, the thing was re- * Marftme. Comment, in Gencf. p. 6jt,6ji. markablc I'he Life ^/ li u c i l i o V a n i n i. 21 markable enough to be remembered, and of too great Importance to be forgot, upon ac- count of that impious Man, and of whofe Death he relates the moft minute Circumftan- ccs. If this negative Argument doth not per- fuade all the Readers, we muft own at leaffc that as Vanini gave a full Account of himfelf, before he died, Gramcnd was in the wrong to fupprefs this particular. However it be, the Diflribution of thefe new Apcfllcs being fettled, and F/ance being appoint- led to our Vanini^ he from that time quitted the name of Luci/io, and afl'umed that of Julius Cafar. Ke thought perhaps, to make as confi- derable fpiritual Conquefts among the Gauls, as Julius Cafar had made temporal ones. But he was diiappointed ; for he did not return to Naples with his Friends in Triumph, nor did he die fo nobly as the Roman Diétator. X. Here we (hall follow him in all his"'* f^'"' Courfes, according to the Method traced byyoygg^j^ Mr. Schramm. You'll fee the Marches and Countermarches of our turbulent Apoftle. He croffed firft through a part of Germany, and advanced as far as Bohemia, where he had fome difcourfe with a Mcmncnite, and maintained ^r, • » obftinately, that the Chnltians dilputed among ohjcétion themfelves about Trifles, and that all thofe who agjinft received the Creed of the Apoftles with thofe, Schifms. of Nice, of Conflamimple and St. Athanafiw, had no reafon to excommunicate and con- demn each other. Our Italian being fatisfied to have railed at the Chriftians about their Doftrine and Schifms, makes an Anabaptift an- fwer coolely according to his Cuflom, that the Roman Catholicks * differ as much jrom the Hereticks, as Truth frcm Faljhood, * Dial. p. 34,9. Having 2z The Life of Lucilio Vanint.' Having travelled all over Germany, he had a mind to fee the Low-Countries, and he ftopped at Amfterdam, where he had feveral Difputes with an Atheift, vvhofe Impieties he obferves. But they are rather, as 1 think, his own Thoughts, which he only puts into the Mouth of another, to have the malicious Pleafure of re- futing them ill ; as we (hall fee by what follows. When he had feen all Holland, and the prin- cipal Cities of Brabant, which he accufes of be- ing full of Infidels, he came to Geneva, where he he had alfo, fays he, a long Difpute with a Dutch Atheijt, whofe Blafphemies and Filthy he confuted •with a great deal of Force and Courage, even to the haz-ard of his Life *. As if there were any danger in a Proteftant City, to launch out vigoroufly againft Libertines, for one who is a Papift? That may do well enough in Italy or Spain, or among feme of the Peafants, to whom Geneva is reprefented as a fafe Retreat of Jews and Atheifts. But fuch is the Charaâer of Vanini : You muft not rely too much upon what he fays, for according to Boileaus Epigram, f his IVords are frivolom, and his Difcourfes no Articles of Faith. XI. Since we mention Geneva, you cannot imagine, Sir, how much the Southern Nations are prejudiced againft that City. I remember, that being lodg'd in Spain, at a Prieft's Houfe, in the Kingdom of Valencia, the Governour of the City, where I then was, being fick, fent to all the Houfes in the Town to get fome Fowls for his Money. They refufed him very rudely. He being piqued at this Refafal, whicli * Dial. p. 318. + toikati Epigr. contre un Athée. Oeuvr. de Boile/iu Tom. 1. was ^he Life f/ Lucilio Van in i. %i was at an unfeafonable Time, becaufe the City,' which had furrender'd idelf, had been rebel- lious to Vhili^ V. he revenged himfelf wi:h a great deal of Mildnefs : He commanded a Ser- geant and two Soldiers, to go into all the Court- yards, and to take by force, and without pay- ing, what had been refufed him for a juft Price.- The Sergeant and Soldiers, began with the Priefts, as being beft ftock'd, and came to our Houfc. My Landlord, a venerable old Man, but very brisk, concefted fome time, but fub- niitted at lafl:, being overcome by his Nephew's and Houfe-keeper's Intreaties ; but not without a great deal of Paffion. In (hort, he could not contain himfelf any longer, when he faw that the Soldiers, (hewing him his Fowls, laugh'd in his Face. Is that^ fays he, the Law of God? It is the Devil*s Law ! In Geneva itfelf there is no- thing done like it. Eflb es Ley de Dios t Es Ley de todos los Diablos ! In Genienjra no fe haze talCofa.' XII. Vanini finding himfelf no longer fecure F/t»iVs "» at Geneva^ becaufe he perhaps r.fted there the^"^?"^""' Libertine, went to Lyons, and took upon him|JJg"Qg^"g alfo to hold forth there under Pretext of teach- for Mar- ing Philofophy. But they difcovered the Ve-tyrdora. nom, and he was obliged to flee, to efcape be- ing burnt. The Plan of his Apoftlefhip was thus often interrupted. He came to England, and made Acquaintance at London, with one Moravi, Chaplain to the Envoy of Venice, and by his Afliduicy to the Carholick Faith, he drew upon him, fays he, the P erf edition of the Prote- ftants. He was put in Prifon, where he remained forty nine Days, zvell prepared to receive the Oown cj Martyrdom, which he wifhed for, fays he, with ail the Ardour imaginable. This happened in idi4. 24 ^^^ ^^f^ ofLv ciLio Van IN I. 1614, and is the fécond Date we have found m his Life, j He is fuf- XIII. But fuch a Martyrdom did not agree pefted in ^jth an Atheift. They let him out of Prifon, ^'^^^/"'^hecrofs'd the Sea, and took the Road for Itafy France again. Another Difappointment in his Views.' again. Genoa feem'd very proper for him to raife him- felf Difciples. He therefore undertook to teach Youth, receiving Scholars of all Degrees: Unhappily for him they had no great regard there for Averroes. They look*d upon him as an Arabian Philofopher, * a profefs'û Enemy of the Immortality of the Soul ; he wrote againft the Cbrijiian Religion, which he look'd upon as falfe, by reafon of the pretended Myftery of the Eucharift; the 'Jevùiflo he called childilh, for the many Rites and Ceremonies; And 1-iftly, the Mahometan^ he ftiles a hoggifh Reliji;i'/ L u c i l i o V a n i n i. if ftiall fpeak prefently of nis Amphitheatre, when we have conduded our Atheifl: to the End of his Courfe. XIV. But not trufting too much to his Books, f^'^'f'^^de in which the Venom is vvrap'd up fo carelefsly,^yj.^y'^'^"ç that it could not efcape the Obfervarion ofofthcCon- Men of Underftanding, he went to Italy again, ^'ent for where having been accufed of reaflumine his ^"^^ lormer Impieties, he return d mto France^ and Crime. took Orders upon him in Gtiienne^ but it is not known in what Convent. The Patiniana tells us this Particularity f. F. Merfenne, who con- firms it, adds another, which, if it is true, is a great Reproach to the Life of our Atheift, viz.. That he was turn'd out of the Convent for his diforderly Behaviour ; and among the reft, for a Crime deferving of Fire and Faggot, which good Manners forbid to name, and the Minime dares not to exprefs himfelf but in Greek. I fhall endeavour to tranflate the whole Paflage. " In " that manner, fays the Fryer, fpeaking againft ** Infidels, 'tis one hears Atheifts talk : IVe are *' hontft Men, ive do nothing againft our Confci- ** encCy ive would rather die than for/wear our ** felves, or wrong any My. But with their leave, " they don't fay true. There is not a worfe " Man than an Atheift : And I prove it even by " the Example of Vanini, the Cafar of the In- *' fidels, who having taken upon him the Ha" " bity and not being willing to diftionour himr " felf by the Love of Women, thought to puc " himfelf out of the reach of Infamy, by giv- ** ing into the Excefs which is attributed to his ** Country ; which being known in the Convene * ** where he was, they turn'd him out as a vile " Monfter *. f Patiniana. p. 1 1 9. * Merfen. Comment, in Genes, p. 6-j\. E XV. Ba- [2(5 T'^^ Xif- fes made the Children of Jfrael pafs through thd red Sea at the time of reflux or low VVater: He alfo treated there at large upon the Te-' nets of the Chriftian Religion, and in particu- lar on the Immortality of the Soul, which Car- dan and Pomponatius had attacked, and he made it appear after his manner, that the Opinion of the latter is of dangerous Confequence. All this without doubt to have an Opportunity of faying againft the Chriftian Religion, whac he pleafed. 'Tis certain he had a good Opi- Libn'Aftjo^ nion of Aftrology, and that confequently henomici, was fomething of an Aftrortomer. He took upon him to publilh A Treatife of Aflrommy^ which- was printed in Germany. Alexander his admirer acquaints us with that particularity in his Dialogues. I have read, fays he f» thefé , Eafter Holy- Days ^ your Books of Afironomy, printed at Strasbourg, with a 'very fine Letter: Tou teach there fotne things concerning the Stars ^ tuhich feem to me admirable and divine. This Book muft be very fcarce, fince M. de La Cro'z.e, whom every body knows to be well verfed in the Hiftory of Literature, without mentioning here his other Accompliftiments, for all the Enquiry he made could not light on it : He not only did not find the Book, but alfo owns, that he no where has feen mention made of it *. To appeafe the Clergy, Vanini compofed alfo Apologia An Apology for the Cotincil of Trent, divided intoj^/^J?""^;] eighteen Books, and direcled againft the Pro-ii^t,. teftants f. Mr. Schramm thinks he was not * Amphithe3tr. p. 38. f Dial. p. 5 1 . * Entrtiien ft;r àrj.fuj. d'Hi/l. ùc. p. Jfj. + See the l^rcface of the Amphitheatre. F i {paring 3^ 7be Life of LvciLio VAiJiiiiU fparing there of Invedives againft Luther, and I believe Calvin met with no better Treatment.- It is a common Stratagem with Infidels, tQ slcreen themfelves from the fecular Power un- der the mask of Orthodoxy, and to lay hold o£ the Body of the Tree, at the time when they dig the Ground to root it out. No Per- fons in thefe latter Times have feem'd to be more interefted for the Dodrine of Grace, than thofe who derided it moft in their Hearts. This Stratagem, notwithftanding it is very grofs, did not fail of Succefs. They are ap- plauded in Converfation and all Conferences, and through a fecret Jealoufy, others, who counterbalance their Merit, are denied the juft Encomiums of their Ability and Zeal. What is pradifed in our Days did alfo happen in Vanims Time. Clear-fighted Perfons, difco- vered immediately in his Books, the Venom which feized the Reader at the firft Approach, and complained of it. But Vanini defended himfelf, and protefted he was zealoufly affefted to the Roman Religion, he wrote of true Wif- dom, of Contempt of Glory; of the Truth and the light of the Council of Trent y he rang- ed himfelf under the formidable Canons of that Council, as fome have skreened themfelves fince behind other Canons ; he frowned at In- novators, and maintained the Intereft of the Church with a dazling Zeal. Thus he efcaped the Cenfure, becaufe he aflumed an Air of Or- thodoxy, which fatisfied fome weak Minds.' He found fome Doâors of the Sorionne, who approved his Works which were vifibly impious. All thefe W^orks oî Vanini ^ whether they were publifhed or not, are loft; we know the Titles and Subjed of them, becaufe he acquaints us with it himfelf in the two ijooks which are not pe- ridi'd, Hhe Life (?f L u c i l i o V a n i n i, '37- rllVi'd, wz.. his Amphitheatre and Dialogues^ of His -rfw- which I am going to give you an Account with f^l^^l^^ all the Fidelity you require of me. hgues. XXII. The Amphitheatres Title is, Amphi- a general theatrum aterna providentia Divim-Magicum^ C/jn- Ii^ca of his ftiano-Pljyficumj Aftrologico-Catholicum, adverfus ve- ^^P^"^^'' teres Philcfophosy Atheos, Epicureos, Pe^'pateticos, Sto^ icoSy &c. That is. An .amphitheatre oj D 'vine Provi^ dence, Divino-Mr.gimm/^hriJtiam^PhyJicumy Aftroh" gicO'Cathîictim,againfi thear.tient Phtlvjcphers^Athe' ifts. Epicureans J Peripateticksy Stoicks, éic. m Svo» printed at LycnSy i<5i5, dedicated to Count de CaftYOy Protestor of his Family and his Bene- fador. It is approved by four Debtors, wz». by Claude Deville, François de Soleil, jaques De^ veine Û" Sève, who acknoivledge to have found there nothing againft tne C"cholick and Roman Faith : But on the contrary ' ^ey affirm, it con- tains very profound and itrong Reafons, agree- able to the moft lublime Doctrine of Matters in Divinity, * and they admire the Advantage it will procure to the juft Caufe. Some Criticks have judg'd that Book pretty The Cpi- innocent. The famous Morhoff f finds there "'°" °^ fome good Proofs for the Immortality of theç^j^^^nup* Soul, and he does not believe that Vanini pub- on his ^w». lilh'd it with an Intention to attack the Chri/ii-t^'f^^'*^''^' an Religion. Barleus alfo fpeaks well of it, and Dieckman doth not like fome ihould find fo much fault with this Book, as if he (hewM himfelf a complete Naturalift in every Page. Never- thelefs F. Merfenne, M. de la Crofe, and a Num- ber of others, are of the contrary Opinion. They difcover there a Stock of Hypocrify and Malice, which lafts from the Beginning to the * This is the Subftance of the Approbation. t MorhoflF/« rolyhidor. Idem in MSS. de Hijl. Liter. ViJ. ^pol. pre Vmin , p. 33. End. '38 ne Life of L u c i l i o V a n i k i. End. My Vote, I muft own, is of no great Moment, but I aflure you ingenuoufly I fide with the Opinion of the laft. I find the Am^ fheatre a very dangerous Bookj and rather more prejudicial* than the Dialogues. I agree, the Venom is more hid there than in the laft ; But it is alfo more methodical and enfnaring. He feems to combat the antient and modern Athc- ifts, and in eflfeâ: he gives them the Vic- tory, by his weak and infignificant Anfwers. But when I fay dangerous, I don't mean they are fo to a Philofopher but indifterently armed. No Sir, you'll find nothing uncommon in Va^- nini. Some Ideas of Arijlotle^ and Averroes, up- on Naturalifm ; fome Extravagancies of Cardan and Pomponatiui's Horofcopes of the now reign- ing Religions : And laftly, fome Difficulties of Cicero * againft Providence, agitated before him in Greece^ by Epicure, Straton, and Carneades, lightly touch'd over again by Seneca : f Which are laftly, produced with all their force, by the ingenious Author which every one knows. This is all you'll find in Vanini, on the Subjed of the Ex- iftence of God, of the Author of Motion, of his Providence, of his Attributes, of the Origin. of Phyfical Evil, of the Immortality of the Soul, &c. He immediately propofes the State of the Qiieftiv->n plain enough, afterwards he relates the beft Rcafoning of the Scholafticks, pretty much at large ; then ridicules 'em, and lubfti- tutes in their Place, either the greateft Nonfenfe in the World, or the moft impious Naturalifm. His Pre- He explains his Defign in the Preface, in a face is ar- manner not becoming a modeft Philofopher. logant. «» J pi-Qpofe^ fays he, in this Work, to unfold. * Sec Lib. 1,11. De Natura Deorum. + See the Book Je Provitienna. " and T'bâ Life of LvciLio VAUitii2 ^p *' and to make plain all the Myfteries of Provi- dence; but don*t exped I (hould take *em from the Declamations ufed by Cicero, nor from thofe Dreams, or rather plaufible Ra- vings of the Divine Philofopher ; and yet much lefs from the abfiird Impertinencies of our Scholafticks : But I (hall draw them from the Source of the moft hidden Philofophy, as being beft able to quench the thirft of cu- rious Minds * ". You fee, he fpeaks of Ci- cero with great Difdain, and yet he has ftole from him through the whole Work ; as I hope to make it appear in the Trandation I have pro- mifed you, of the Book of T'he Nature of the Gods; which will be publifh'd^ God willing, next Year, if the Publick doth nor difcourage me. XXIII. The firft Diflertations of the Am- He attacks phitheatre feem, at firft fight, very innocent :^JfJ''o^K- But don't truft him, for he focn overthrows mentsf of again what he has eftablifh'd, or at leaft he the Necef- burthens it with Difficulties, and flings himfelf, ^^y of ^he at all hazard, into Averroes's Metaphyficks,^^'^ ^"^^ where I muft own in^enuoufly I cannot follow Motion. him. The necefiary Exiftence of a firft intelli- gent Caufe of Motion, who has at leaft ranged things in the Order we fee, is one of our chief Arguments againft Atheifts. As for him, he prevaricates upon this Proof, and omits no turn to difimbarrafs himfelf from it; bur here 'tis where he entangles himfelf moft, and grows perfedly unintelligible : Spi no/a is noz more ob- icure in his Ethkks. You know, Sir, this is the Cafe of all In.'idels : Norhinc; is more im- penetrable than their Principles, and Providence has wifely ordered it, that what is defigned by the wicked to root out of the Hearts of Men, ♦ Preface to the Am^hit. the 5ô ^he Life ofLv çiLio V an i n i. the Belief of a Divinity, i:; always very ob- fcure, and confequentjy improper to do the Effed. Vaniniy afc^r having done all his Endea- vours to weaken the Proofs of a firft Caufe o£ Motion, fubftitutes another, as ridiculous as poflGble to imagine. He reafons upon the Number 5), and draws from it a pretended De- imonftration, which he calls Divino-magica, or Caballiflka, and boafts of having proved there- by the Exiftence of God more ftrongly, than by the Proof we proaucedi which is as antient as the World ^felf. But once more that is his way Î he mooks the Chriftians by propofîng their Reafons in an unfair :rjanner; he embroils them by Arijloulian Subtleties, and after he has rejefted 'em, he fubilitutes new ones that are pitiful. He gives XXIV. He fucceeds befl: when he throws his an ambi- D.^^bts on the hrft Truths, which are the fiSn ofï^<^"^^^^^^" °f ^^^ others; fuch are for Exam- theDivini-p!e, the Exiftence of God and his Providence, ty« As the Nature of thefe two Objeds infinitely exceeds our Capacity, he imagines to have re- futed them, when he has (hewn the infinite Difproportion there is betwixt the lownefs of our Conception, and the heigth of thofe Ob- ]e^s. As for Inftance, he thought to refute the Divinity, by giving the following Definition of it. " You ask me, fays he, * what is God ; but if I knew it, I (hould be God ; for no one knows what God is, but God himfelf. We may neverthelefs know him in fome meafure by his Works, almoft in the Hime manner as we know the Light of the Sun thro* a Cloud, which eclipfesit. Behold now how our Hand • AtnpfyU. p. 10. makes « ^he Life ^/ L u c i l i o V a n i n i. 44 makes bold to defcribe that firft of all Be- ings, altho* perhaps very vainly. God is to " himfelf his Beginninj? and his End ; the' he *' has neither Beginning nor End. He has no " need neither of one or the other, and yet he ** is the Author of both. He fublifts continu- " ally without any Time : Equally not fufcep- *^ tible of what is pafl: or to come. He reigns " every where, without any Place ; unmove- ** able, without any Situation; fwift, without ** Motion ; all, without all things; within eve- " ry thing, without being enclofed ; without " every thing, without being excluded. In *' every thing, he governs all; without every *' thing, he has created. He is good without *' Quality; great without Quantity; univerfal *' without Parts; unchangeable tho' he changes " all : His Will is his Power, and the exerting *' his Power doth not differ from his Will: *' Simple, in him nothing is in Power, but eve- *' ry thing in the Ad, he is in himfelf pure ; " the firft, the middlen.oft, and laft Aft. In ** (hort, he is all, above all, beyond all, before " all, and after all, and he yet remains all." XXV. Perhaps you'll fay Sir, I am very bold to tranflate this Paffage after the famous Mr. Sauy'in^ who has explained it in one * of his Sermons in a concife manner indeed, but much more elegant, than it is in Vanint himfelf; but I beg you'd remember this is a Letter, where we undertake to difcover with Exadnefs the Venom of our AthtiB ; and not a Sermon where commonly one is fatisfy'd with pointing at it, which yet (hou*d be done with abundance of Circumfpedion. As for the reft, you are * The Title of the Sermon is/«r les profomleurs divines the 4th, Tcm. r. See Sanrin's Anfwer to Vanini's Definition. liiJ G too 4îi 7^^^ X/f tjon. " In the Month of November^ of the laft P'J^^^"' ^ " Year * (fays the Mercury J was taken Prifoner, lôl's. *" in the Town of Tholoufe^ an Italian^ a Philofo- His Em- " pher, very learned, who went about in Fa- ployrnent «' milies, teaching Children that were defirous Hi^lmpt"" tounderftandPhilofophyperfcdly. He main- tics. " tain'd, and taught, that our Bodies are with- " out Souls, and that being dead, our Being ** was deftroy*d like unto Brutes : That the *' BleiTed Virgin (O execrable Blafphemy \) had *' had .1 carnal Knowledge as other Women ; *' and other Words yet more fcandalous, alto- '* gether unworthy to be related or wrote. By " hisEloqucnce, he fubtilyinftilled hispernicious *' Opinions in the Minds of his private Audi- • — ' * Merc.frr,::. Tom. V. p. 63, C^. Ann. 1619, ** tors. 7*-^^ X//nS *■' depend upon the Motion of the Cseleftial Bo- " dies : And how do you then maintain they " are not fram'dfor us ? Truly if thofe Conftel- " lations are not made for us, I would not then " fear Mars, which in the Orb prelîded at my " Birth." * Now Mï?-j- is a Planet which fore- tells Wars, Sufferings, and Tragick Deaths ; How then can we, after this, doubt of the Ve- racity of Aftrology ? Having no Principles of Religion, not even of the Religion of Nature; (ince he thought the World was eternal, and guided only by blind NecelTity, we muft not HisMorakbe furprized if his Morals were not perfedly l^ad. good. I detefl: vain Accufations; and in rela- tion to the Dead, I would have the moft ftrici Equity obferv'd : But the pofitive Aflcrtions of * Ami hit. p. Tf. Father 'The Life of LucrLioVANiNT. 99 Father Merfenne^ on the Conduft of Vanini in tlie Monaftry, gives room for a ftrong Sufpicion. Add to that the Teftimony of Vrefident Graimud^ who was in the fame Place, and declares to have known him exceeding V' -I 'iptuous, ftrength- ens that Sufpicion : And in ihort, his Dialogues, ib full of Obfcenity and profane Turns, renders it highly probable. He fpeaks of one of his MiftreflTes, named Ifabella^ which he ftil'd his little Left Ey«y and for whom he composed amo- His wan- rous Songs. This is a fine Confefîîon for a ton Stile. Prieft, in a Book of Religion and Philofophy ! He is delighted when he fpeaks of Generation, doing it in fuch licentious Terms, that it is ea- sily perceivable, his Heart is not very clean, fince his Imagination is fo polluted. He goes yet farther, and feems to approv^e Debauchery ; for when he fpeaks about Arijlotle^ who receive fuch confiderable Sums from Alexander, for the Study of Animals, our Alexander confeflfes to his Julius, that as for him, he had expended his whole Eftate in keeping a little Animal (he means a CourtifanaJ. * Julius gives his Ap- probation, faying, That many will think he has embrac'd the bell Choice. Is it then at all fur- prifing Providence cut off this young Madman in the beginning of his Courfe ? Mr. de la Crofe charitably believes, that his Opinion at Imprifonment wrought a Repentance, and that Mr. u he fpoke to his Judges no lefs fmcerely ^^^^^^^f-Jf^^ orthodoxly, when he made ufe of the common tj.'a£ting. Inferences to demonftrate the Exiftence of God, in (hewing the Straw. I would not condemn a Judgment fo charitable ; and I am of his Opi- Very cha- hion, that when things are doubtful, it is beft ritabie. to incline to the leaft difadvantageons fide ; But really I don't know whether this Rule can f Dial. p. 298. O 2 be menr oi:' Tholoiife. HarOinefs of Gra- tnond. loa n^he Life ofLvciLioV K-i^mt» be applied to a Man who lived and died as Vanini. I would obferve again, that it did not become our Italian to banter Socrates upon his Imprifon- ment, and to behave fo ill in his; it is thus the Rigour ofPveproaches he makes to others fall on himlelf. the Parl:a- He iuug a Recantation, but it was not thought fincere enough :o be heeded. We fay alfo, that the Parliamen: of T/joloufe drove things a little too far. It is, I confefs, the Intereft of Prin- ces and Republicks to fupprefs Impiety, when it dogmatifes, becaufe of the fatal Confe- quences it may have among a Society of Chri- ftlans: But I cannot tell whether that (hould not be moderated by Prudence. Mr. la Crqfe pretends, that a Retracing in form, as Vanini did, fhould be fufficient; there being room to re- new the Profecution if the Delinquent relapfed. Gvamondy according to him, drops the Charac- ter of an Hiftorian, by his harfh Method of relating the Fa6t. The ill Condud and Mis- fortunes of Men claim always a Right to our Compaflion, and which it is unjuft to deny them ; and though it be allowable to abo- minate their Excelles, as they greatly deferve, yet Humanity requires we fhould compaffionate their Perfons. But if the Severity of Gramond and the Parliament cannot admit of an Apo- logy, neither I am perfuaded can the laft Hours of Vanini-^ and particularly his blafpheming againft Jefus Chrift. In that Paflage only is confpicuous the moft grofs Hypocrify, fince he openly infultshim whom he call'd upon in Prifon, and of whofe Sacraments he bad partaken. All OH'<ï»mf'st|^is fliould render Atheifm very fufpicious to us. Apology, LY. Such was Vanini^ as I have reprefented printed in *- i i r \ • tt/ • ■ A Latin at him to you, both trom his own Writmgs, ana Raterdam. fufficient Authority; judge then. Sir, what we muft tliink of this Apologift, who pretends, to give The bft Hours of Vanini dreadful. Jbe Life of î^vciLio Yah iti J. loi give us an entire Juftification of him, in a fmall Latin Treacife, lately publifti'd under this Title, Apologia pro Julio Cafare Vanino, NeapoUtam^ i. e. An Apology for Julius Cafar Vanini^ a Neapoli- tan. I can affure you that Piece is not ferioufly wrote. It is a Perfon of Learning who is the Author, that drew it up by way of Banter, and in order to try his Wit, in the Defence of a Bad Caufe. And what is the mod ufeful in that little Book is. That it relates both for and againft, and is ample in Quotations, telling you his Authority: Moreover, that there are feve- ral Circumftances, taken notice of neither by Mr. Schramm^ nor Mr. la Crofe. After having briefly told us the Names^ the Country^ Travelsy and Writings of Vanini^ he anfwers to eighteen Heads of Accufation alledged againft him, at each particular, making fome poetical or hifto- rical Oblervations, which are always pleafing. Thefe following are the Eighteen Articles, with their Anfwers abridged; as the Author himfelf gives them at the End of his Book. Aecufati- 1. It is /aid Vanini knew not God. U/l}ich is °"^ ^^' Gramond'i Expreffion. Deum ignorabat. gïnfthîm, Anfw. Becaufe he would not dive cut of the and the Rc- Reach of his Underftanding. plies of his 2. That he brought to light again the Book inti- -^P^'^S^"- tuled. Of the Three Impoftors. Anfw. Which is a Chimera. 3. iThat he hath advanced the very IVords of Atheifis. Anfw. Only to point out their Poifon. 4. Tloat he hath anfwe/d them very lightly. Anfw. Becaufe thinking the old Anfwers fuffi- cLently known, he look'd out chiefly for new ones. 5. 77;«t he held in Execration the Humanity of Chrifi. Anfw, fol The Life of LucilioVanini. Anfiu. Calumny. 6. 'That he hath accusa the Virgin Mary of ha,-* ving loft her Virginity. Anjiu. A Fable. 7. That he efleem'd Nature the only God. Anfw. There have been many illuftrious Per- fons call'd Gods. 8. That he blant'd thofe Schoolmen viho reafond about Angels. Anfw. He relates the Words cf others. Ç. That he required a phyjical Account of the Na- ture of Devils. Anfw. Becaufe there is much Superftition in the Opinions of the Vulgar. 10. That he denied the Immortality of the Soul. Anfw. No where. I X T"/ at he was an Af^rofriypr, Anfw. Very well, muft he therefore be an 'Atheift? 12. T'hat he contefted the future DefiruBion cf the World by Ftre. Anfw. After his Method. 1 3 . That he maintain d Fatality ï Anfw. He meant Providence. 14. That he fancied Letters in the Heaven. Anfw. By Superftition. 15. That he refutes neither Cardanus nor Haly] Anfw. Becaufe he had already done it elfe- where. * 16. 'fhat he laugl/d at f acred Things. Anfw. Which, in fad, were not fuch. 17. That he was rejeEled by the Fyyars, and turnd out of their Monaflery. Anfw. As if by that he was rejefted of God. 18. Tioat laftly he was condemn d to die. * I fuppofc in fomc of hi: Wnt-ir.g;-, which arc deftroy'd or loft i that is what the Apologift means. Anfw, T'be L/fe ofLvciLi o y Anin II ^03 'Attfw, As feveral other innocent Perfons have been. This may fuffice to (hew you that little Book is not ferioufly wrote ; therefore, I do not undertake to refute it : Neither indeed is Va^ mini himfelf worthy of it. Let the PubHck on- ly compare this Life with that Defence, and decide accordingly. LVI. But I cannot yet finifh without fpeak- ing a word or two about Mr. Bay le. You know. Sir, the great efteem I have always had for his Ingenuity, and with what vehemence I have withed he would turn it to a more uni- form Ufe, and more worthy of him. I have often been with him, but we never agreed in any Point, but difputed about every thing. I told him my Thoughts about feveral Parts o£ his Works, as I would now do were he living. So that I flatter myfelf no one will Refled 011 me, fince I take only the fame Liberty now, as I would have done during his Life. Ic then may be allowed me to obferve, that int relation to Vanini^ Mr. Bayle cannot be excufed "' for fpeaking about him in fo negledful a manner as he does in his Penfees Diverfes. I immediately fuppofe he had in his Library GYamond^s Hiftory, fince he gives us to under- fiand fo in his DiBionary, at the Article con- cerning that Prejtdentj and where he fpecifies the very Edition he makes ufe of I likewife fuppofe he had Parkers Book de Deo, fince he quotes him with Approbation, and pretty co- pi oufly. Now in the firft Sedion of that Book, (which is the more curious, becaufe it is an A- bridgment of Atheifm and Atheifts, a Subject very proper in itfelf, to relifli Mr. Bayle s Tafte) there is found in it the very Pidure of Vaijm'y and that long Pafiage of Gramoni which 104 T^he Life of Lv citio V an i n i. which I above related at large *. It being thus^ I ask, that it may be allowed me to believe, that Mr. Bayle had read in Parker and Gramonâ, the true Charader of Vanini. Nay, he confefles as much himfelf in his Entretiens Poflhumes a- gainft Mr. Jaquelet, although he gives us to un- derftand, that it was but after the firft Edi- tion of his Penfées Diverfes, in which he has given us a very wrong Idea of the Charadcr and Martyrdom of Vanim. That's well j but yet he fhould have correfted that Article in the latter Edition, or at leaft retrad it in the Contimtation \ the Subjeft was of fufficient Im- portance and Equity, which abfolutely required it. There is fo much difference between an honeft Man defcribed, as he has done Vanint, and a Dcfcrlption of onp fnch ^^ i^ given US of the fame by Gramond^ and between a Martyr for Atheifm, and a notorious Hypocrite ^ fuch as was our Neapolitan ; that it was undoubtedly re- quired of Mr. Bayle's Exaditude to make a Note at that part of his Treatife, and to let us know he had received better Information on that Subjecl, and befides, that .'all that Ihould be amended ,in the Supplement to his DiBionary. Had he done that, he would not have expofed himfelf to the juft Reproaches of Mr. Jaquekt, who confulted the truth of the Hiftory, and took the advantage of it in his Book, intituled. Examen de la Théologie de Mn Bayle. But after what manner is I'anini fpoke of in that Book, intituled, Penfées Diverfes^ or i^/z- rious Thoughts f ? Firft, he is reprefented as an honeft Man, and afterwards as a Martyr * See above, Ch. Lii. •f- Ver.féci Viver[es, Tom.!, p: 35*6. and following Edition of 1704. for 'J he Life ^/ L u c i l i o V a n i n i. i oy for Atheifm. Let us quote the Words of chat celebrated Philufophcr, adding thereto, fome Obfervations which is all at prêtent I ihall do. J^Jj"^" ^j^^[' " The detsftable Vanini (fays he) who tvas without " burned in the Year 1612, ?it T'houkufe ^ tor foandarion, *^ Atheifm, had always been pretty regular in ^jj^^^^j'"'' " his Morals, and whoever would have under- Morilitt. " taken to attack him on any other Point but " liis Doftrine, would have run a great Rifque *' of being accufed of Calumny. To judge at firft Sight by the Method Mr. Bayle takes, one would think he refolved to opprefs us with fufficient Authority in fa- vour of Vanini. Neverthelefs, contrary to his ufual Cuftom he urges none, which appears fomething furprifing in a Man, of that famous Critick's Charaâer, fo curious in moft refpeds and chiefly in what relates to the Hiftory of the two laft Centuries, and that of the Atheifts. Was his Library fo ill furnilhed, that he had no Book in it that made mention of Vanini .<* Gra- mondy Father Marfenne^ Garajfe^ Patin and all thofe others which Mr. Bayle had read, did they unanimoufly afifert, that oui' Neapolitan was fufficiently regular in his Morals? He (hould be well aflured of a Faâ: of that Impor- tance before laying it down as the Foundation of his Reafoning : Othenvife one may always fay, that the Crimes of the Atheifts have been defignedly palliated, whilft care was taken with much Pains, and fearch to make confpicuous the Failings of thofe that had the leaft Zeal for Religion. But this is not all, Vanini has been a true Martyr for Atheifm, he openly dogmatized and maintained his Opinions to his laft Breath. This is the fécond Illufion of Mr. Bayle.'' When !' I confider (fays he) that Atheifm has had P " Martyrs, c6 'The Life of Lucilio Vanini. Martyrs, I doubt no longer, but Atheifts have a ftronger Idea of Honefty imprinted " on their Minds, than thofe of the pweet and *' profitable. For why did Vanini fo indifcretly " amufe himfelf to dogmatize before Perfons " who could eafily bring him to Juftice. If " he fought but his own private Profit, he *' (hould have contented himfelf with a per- " feu fecurity of Confcience, without heeding ** to have Difciples. He muft then have had " the defign in making them either to become " the Head of the Parry or to free Men from " a burthen which in his Opinion hindered " them from diverting thcmfelves at their Eafe. He fuppofes here Atheifm has had its Mar- tyrs, yet he aliedgcs but two Examples: The firft is Vanini^ the other a certain Fryer, whom Mr. Ricand mentions in his State of the Ottoman Empire. But of the former I hope he will allow us to think otherwife, fince it appears from the pofitive Teftimony of Gramond^ that he ufed his beft Endeavours for to fave himfelf. And as to the latter who was named Maho^ met Effendt, we ftiall fpeak of him anon, let us leave him for a little while. It fuffices then that Vanini is not a Martyr. And fuppofing there are true Martyrs for Atheifm, he reafons at random upon the. Prin- ciples from whence they ad ; at firft giving them a certain greatnefs of Soul, faying I doubt not but Atheifts have in themfelves a jufl: Idea of what is honeft, which is ftronger in their Minds than that of what is profitable or agreeable. It is certain it muft be fo, ilnce ac- cording to Mr. Bayle^ they become Martyrs for their Caufe: But if this laft Propolition be denied, and it may be faid, that Atheifts may dogmatize in private, but do not perfevere in their n!he Life ^/ L u c i l i o V a n i n r, 107 their conftancy to Martyrdom, and confe- quently tliac they have not an Idea of honefty ftronger than thofe of what is fweet and profi- table, then his Superflrufture falls. Let us take for Example Vanini. It cannot be denied but that he was an Atheift ; having but Wit and Ambition, the thirft after Glory perpetu- ally gnawing him i Mr. Bayle pretends he was pretty regular in his Morals; All which makes appear there was fome Idea in him of Honefty. The Queftion is now to know whether that Idea would have carried him to deprive him- felf of what was fweet and profitable, and even Life itfelf. But let us not Reafon up- on the uncertain Inclinations of his Heart, let us rather confult Fafts. It is then certain, that in Mr. Bayle's fenfe what is fweet and profitable has been ftronger than what is ho- neft. For he (Vanini) recanted, he was a perfe(5t Biggot in Prifon, he masked himfelf, and remained fo until he found there was no longer room for Hypocrify. Truly if Atheifm had a triumphant Blow to ftrike, it was in the Perfon of Vanini i an Author of thirty Years old, full of Ambition for himfelf and the glory of Atheifm, who had buffooned Socrates^ and fo- lemnly declared in his Works againft DifiGmu- lation. Such a Man, or none but the like, I fay, fhould have the Idea of Honefty to that degree, that the fweet and profitable (hould never efface it, or be ftronger than it, efpecial- ly in an occafion fo decifive as this i notwith- ftanding his Strength failed, or more properly that of Atheifm. "Mr. Bayle always depending upon the con- ' ftancy of Vanini prefumes this Qiieftion, For ivhy did Vanini (fays he) Jo indifcreetly amufe himfelf to dogmatize before Perfora vjho could eafi- P 2 h 1 08 *The Life of LucilioVanini. l^ bring him to '^uftice^ if he fought but for his own private Profit^ he fooulà have contented himfelf with a perfecî tranquility ofConfcience without the de- fire of having Difciples. The u'ord Indifcreetly, here put in, is a fufficient Anfwer to the Queftiou itfclt, young Men being for- the moft part fo, but efpecially fuch as Vanini^ who overflowed with Vanity and Pride. You have feen how he praifes liimfelf in his Dialogues, and after what manner he treats Solo?mn, St. Paul^ Jefus Chrijl ; as well as the chief Articles of the Chriflian Faith. Notwithftanding he would not pafs for an Atheift. In his Dedication to Baf^ fvfHpire^ he opprefles the Libertines with Re- proaches ; in his Dialogues he calls them Ante- Chrifts, and in (hort tov/ards the end of his Book, he is fo afraid to be attacked that he fubmits all to the Authority of the Holy-See^ and recants beforehand of whatever might of- fend it. His Vain-Glory obliged him to dog- matize fecretly, but his Self-Jove provided him always with a back Door to efcape. There- fore as to what rejjards Ju/iice, he did not mind it much, as Mr. Bayle imagines, as well by rea- fon of his Charafter of Pr ieft, which feemed to oblige him to fubmitto another Jurifdidion, as becaufe of his Wit and Eloquence, upon which he rely'd very much, without mention- ing the Difficulties on the fubje(5l of Providence, upon which he had for a long time reflcfted, and which lie was very capable of rendring confujcd. But afrer all Mr. Bayle can never make n;e believe, that a Man io Pulillanimous ns JAmini, hath braved a Prifon, he fo ill luf- ferrd. // he fought but his private pyofit^ lie f?:uld ccntent himjclf with quietly injvyiug a per^ fe^l fecmity of Cmfcieucc. Tiiat would undoubt- edly be the nicft prudçnt choice for an A- ihciil. Tfe Life