A> P' ^^a^ Sec Mt; / / h Grace Defended^ I N A Modeft Plea F O R A N Important Truth:, Namely, That the Offer of Salvation made to Sinners in the Gofpel, comprifes in it an Offer of the Grace given in Regeneration. AND Shewing the Confiftency of this Truth with the Free and Soverei»9n Grace of G O D, in the whole Work of Man's Salvation. In Which The Dodlrine of Original Sin and Humane Impotence, the ObjetSl and Extent of Redemption, the Nature of Regeneration, the Difference between Common and Special Grace, the Nature of juftifying Faith, and other Important Points, are confidered and cleared. t^l t^ t^ '.^ :.tf>5 «^*^^ t^T-^t^ •-^. v^. t^. c^'-tf^ '■^.•'^ !.<^. t-^ t^. t^Tt^^ (^i t^. v^ ',^5 By Experience D/Iayhew, Ifai. Ivii. 14. Caji ye up^ cafl ye up^ prepare the IVay^ take up the JlnmUing Block out of the IVay of my People. Pfal. Ixxxv. 10. Mercy and Truth are met together^ kc. BOSTON: Printed by B. Green, and Company, for D. Henchman, in Cornhik i 7 44. SEP 5 1941 ^ THE PREFACE. RUTH is a very precious Jewel : Ta- ken in general it is fo 5 but that which is emphatically called tbe 'Trulhy is fo more efpecially : I mean that which is revealed to a linful and perifliing World, with Re- fped to a Way of Salvation by a Redeemer ; and which is indeed no other than the Gofpel. That was therefore good Advice of the wife Man, Buy tbe Truth, and Jell it not : And that was a very excel- lent Saying of the great Apoftle, We can do 7iothi7ig agaijiji the 'Truth, but for the Truth, Indeed there are many who are apt to make fuch a Profeflion, who cannot do it on fo good Grounds as the holy Apoftle did. But I remember a Saying of a very worthy Divine ^ to thisPurpofe, " That when fo- " ber Perfons offer to prove by the Word of God what " they fay and maintain, we ought, in Honour to the Mr. John Robinfon, A " divine n PREFACE, ^* divine Oracles, to fhewfo much Regard to them, as " to examine into the Truth of what they fo offer to i^fconiii'm," However uncertain we may be with Refpe(!l to ma- ny Things, which we have a Call to take under Con- fideration ; yet I think we may be very fure of this, that the beft and wifeft of Men, in their prefent lapfed State, know but in Part^ and prophefy hut in Part ; and fo had need cany themfelves very humbly in all their Eflays for the Iveftigation and Declaration of theTruth ; and that the Truth being fuch an invaluable Treafure, as is above expreffed, it ought not on any flighty Grounds to be parted with, and fuffered to be lojfl:. We are therefore forhetimes called to contend earneffly for the Faith once delivered to theSaints ; and to be willing rather to fuffer Reproaches, and other Evils, than that the Caufe of Truth fhould futfer thro' our Negledl. That is, in a good Senfe, a Truth concerning all Chriftians, but e- fpecially the Minifers of Christ, who are Jet for the Defence of the Gofpel^ and made Stewards of the MyJieriesofGody viz. For this End was I boim^ and for 'this Caiife came I into the Woi'ld^ that I JJooidd bear Wit- Tiejs to the Truth, As for the following Effay, whatever Cenfure.I may fall under on the Account of it, I think it has not been yaMy undertaken, or engaged in; it being the Refult of many Years ferious Enquiry after the Truth ; and I have in it endeavoured, in my poor Manner^ to imitate the noble Bereans^ who received the Word with all Pea- dijiefs of 'Mind, and fear ched the Scriptures daily ^ whether thofe Things which fhey heard preached were fd: " ' PR E F A C E. si I have been from my Youth naturally inclined to en- deavour to underftand what I believe ; and why I be- lieve this or that Propofition to be true : And yet I very readily acknowledge, That when any Propofition is evidently delivered in the Scriptures of Truth, I ought for that Reafon to believe it to be true, tho' I cannot fully comprehend the fame, and am not able to anfwer all Objedlions that can be made againft it : But then I muft be fure that it is indeed delivered in the divine Oracles, in which Cafe every Tho' t JJmdd be jcaptivated to the Obedience (?/ ' Ch r i s t . In the little Reading for which I have had Leifure and Opportunity, I have been chiefly converfant in the Wri- tings of Cahinijls ; yet I confefs I have endeavoured not to be wholly ignorant of the Principles of thofe who Qva- hv^CQ or incYmc to tliQ j4rmh2m?i Hypotbefis ; and have always preferred the Former as much the beft of the Two : So that I cannot juftly be looked upon as en- deavouring to overthrow the Firft, and eftablilh the O- ther. This is what I do not at all intend ; but what I endeavour is, to remove fome Things out of the. Way, commonly 2iffci'tcd hy Calvlmjis, which I think maybe difmifled from their Hypothefis, being no Ways ne- ceflary in order to the Support of the principal Articles in that Scheme ; but on the contrary, render it the more difficult to be received and defended. And what I to this End advance, I humbly fubmit to the Cenfurc of the Learned and Judicious, What is principally infifted on in this EfTay, is, That the Offer of Salvation made to Siiiner^ in the Gojpel^ does comprife in it an Offer ^ or conditional Fromife, of the Grace given in Regeneration, I believe there is as really iv PREFACE. yeally a conditional Offer of this made to fmful Men, in the Gofpel of the Son of GoD,as there is of Pardon of Sin, Juftification, ©r. In this I think I differ from moft that are in the cahinian Scheme : And I confefs I was for many Years otherwife minded -, but while I en- deavoured to defend what I then believed^ the Objec- tions that offered themfelves to my Mind againft what I had admitted as true, prevailed on me firil to doubt of it, and by Degrees to receive the Dodtrine I now en- deavour to defend : And if I make good what I affert, I think I do not therein diminifli, but exalt God's Grace. I for feveral Years endeavoured in a more private Way to get Satisfad:ion in thefe Points, wherein I was fallen into a Way of thinking fomewhat different from many others, before I entertained any Tho'ts of pub- liihlng my Sentiments. I frequently difcourfed with, and fometimes wrote to learned Divines, concerning the Matters here difcourfed of; and had, I think, no Matter of Convid:ion that I v/as under any Miftakes j much lefs, that I had advanced any dangerous Errors. And I cannot deny but that fome pious and learned Divines have fpoken fomewhat favourably of my Hy- •pothefis ', and have expreffed their Willingnefs that I ihould, by the Prefs, Jhew my Opinion. I have in this Ellay, endeavoured not to provoke or offend any Perfon whatfoever ; and now profefs, that I greatly refpe(ft and honour thofe, whofe Sentiments dif- fer from fome of mine, difcovered in this Difcourfe : And I have therefore chofen rather to argue on die ' Things confidered, than meddle with the Perfons from whofe Opinions I diffent. And PREFACE. V And after all that I have faid for the Support of my own Hypothefis, ( in the Explanation of whicli I have endeavoured to be very free and open ) I tliink I ain fully refolved ferioufly to v^eigh every Thing tliat fljall be offered for my Conviftion, according to the befl: of my Skill and Judgment ; and I hope if I am in an Er- ror, my Fault is not unpardonable. I alfo hope, that if I am wrong in any of my Senti- ments, I have taken fuch Care to iecure the fundamen- tal Articles in the Do6trine of Grace^ that Men's Souls will not be endangered by any Thing advanced in this Attempt to fet fome Things in a clearer Light tlian they feem to me to be fet m, in fuch Books as I have had Opportunity to read ; but it may be thro' my own Ignorance underftand not. I have not in this Eflay had any Defign againft the Dodirine of Original Sin^ God's etenml Decrees and Providence^ the Difference betwixt common and fpecial Grace ^ and the Sovereignty of God in the Affair of Man's Salvation. For according to my Hypothefis, as well as that I oppofe, that is a great Truth maintained by tlie Apoftle, Rom. ix. It is not of him that willeth^ mor of him that runneth^ but of God that fo ewe th Mer- cy . Thefe Things I not only allow, but occafio- nally endeavour to defend ; tho' this not being my principal Defign, I have not much enlarged on them : But my main Defign is tlut above expreffed. That what I have attempted \n this Treatifc, may not appear to be uielefs to iiich as may pleafc to read it, I have endeavoured to render it prad:lcal, by fome ufefiil Inferences from the Truths aflerted in it. . . Tho' vi PR E F ACE, Tho' thisEflay be more efpecially fubmitted to the Judgment and Cenfure of the Learned^ yet I aim at the Good of all Mankind in it ; and I have written it^ and do confent to it's Publication, that I might y^r'u^ my own Generation by the Will of God, If he approve my Attempt, he can eafily give Succefs to it ; if other- wife, I fubmit it to him, and fay, .ne Will of the Lord. be do?ie, I have unto the Body of the Treatife herewith emit- ted, prefixed the Contents of the general Parts and Chapters contained in it -, of which I requeft my Reader to take a view, before he reads the Book itfelf, whereof he has therein the Sum. I defire my Reader alfo to read what I have written, in the Order in which it is penned, left otherwife he ihould miftake my Meaning in fome Things, which in this Difcourfe I have advan- ced ; and therein prejudice both himfelf and me, wlio fincerely defire to ferve him, and glorify the God of all Grace. E. Mayhew. THE CONTENTS. PART I. ^^i^ PON the Offbr of Salvation made to P^<^ff| Sinners in the Goipel. Page I CHAP. I. Concerning thofe Sinners, and the State they are in^ to ^Lvho?n the Offer of Salvation is Juppofed to be made. Here the Dodtrine oi Original S^in is confidered. P. i. CHAP. II. Concerning that Salvation, lahich Sinners arc j'uppofed to have offered to the?n intbe.Gojpet. P. 27. [>] C II A P. 2 The CONTENTS. CHAP. III. Shelving "what is imported in Salvation's being offered. Here the Nature of C^W/V/W is conlidered. P. 33. CHAP. IV. Froving that there is iiideed an Offer, or conditional Promife of Salvation, made to Sinners in the GofpeL Here the Obje^ and Extent of Christ'^ Death is confidered. P. 40. PART IL Shewing that the Offer of Salvation 7nade to Simiers in the Go/pel^ comprifeth in it an Offe?' of the Grace given in Regenera- tion. P- 53• c H A p. I. Concernirig the Grace of Regeneration, /j^r^y^/V/^ ^t? conditionally offered to Sinners. P. 53, C H A P. II. Shewing that the Grace ^Regeneration is fiich an emi^ nent Part of Marl's Salvation, that Salvation cannot be offered to Si?iners without an Offer (j/'that. P. 58. CHAP. III. Concerning the Nature ofthatYdiih a?id Repentance, &c. to which the Promife ^/' Life <^;2(/ Salvation, is in this Difcourfe Juppofed to be ?nade. Here the Difference ht\.W\xico7nmondx\^fpecialGraceh cowii^^vtdi, P. 61. CHAP. The CONTENTS. 3 CHAP. IV. Shewing that God in offering Jesus Christ mth alt his Benefits^ to Jinfiil Men, miiji needs offer them tk' Grace given in Regeneration. P. 67 CHAP. V. T^bat fieither the Grace of Regeneration, 7ior any Ad: f owing from it, or i?i which it is implied, is the Con- dition on which Salvation is offered : And confequent- ly, the fame ??mji be comprehe?ided in the Salvation offered to Sinners, P. 7 1 , CHAP. VI. T^he Offer of Salvation 7nade to Sin?iers in the Gofpel, is an Offer of bringing them into a State of Salvation .* And confeqnently, mufi comprife in it an Offer of re- generating Grace. P. 86. C H A P. VII. T^hetr being an infeperahle Connexion between all fpiri- tual Bleffngs, or ever hilling Mercies, hence whenever ajiy one of thefe is offered to Si?mers,z\\ the reft are in- tended : And confeqiiently, the Grace of Regenera- tion. ■ " ^ P. 87. CHAP. VIII. l^hat thofe exceeding great and precious Promifes by which we may bePartakers of the divine Nature, are conditional Pro7nifes of tlie Grace of Regeneration. Here thof^: Promifes commonly iaid to be abjolute, are confidered. ' P. 89. [ b 2 ] C II A P. 4 The CONTENTS. C H A P. IX. That the conditional Fromijes made in Scripture, That fiicb as feek Gor, and his fpecial Favour, JJ. all find riiiB, do contain or imply in them an OJfer of the Grace y^ "Regeneration. P. 97. C H A P. X. That the conditional Fromijes of the Holy Spirit, which we have in the Oracles ofGo'D, do comprife or imply in them Ofers /?/' converting Grace. P- 99• C H A P. XI. l!hat the Offers niaJe to Sinners of the Water of Life, in the Gofpelj are Ofers of the faving Graces of the Spirit. P. 104. CHAP. XII. Thofe cojiditional Offers ij/' fpiritual Wifdom, which are 7nade to Sinners in the Word of Got>, are Offers of a Principle 5/" laving Grace or Holinefs. P. 1 07. C H A P. XIII. That the conditional Fromifes of fpecial Mercy, 7nade to fuch as come to Jesus Christ, do contain or iitiply in them a Promife of regenerating Grace. P. 117. C H A P. XIV. That there are conditional Fromifes made in the Gofpcl^ to fuch as perfevere and overcome, which contain in them Offers of the Grace ^"^'Regeneration. P. 120. CHAP. The CONTENTS. 5 CHAP. XV. 'I^je Confideratlon, That Sinners do therefore psrlili be- caiife they receive not the Love of the Truth that . they may be laved, applied as a?i Argument that they have an Offer oi a Principle of true Holinefs made to them. P. 131. CHAP. XVI. Shewing that the Dodlrlne pleaded for in this Part of piy FJjayy.is very CQnfi\\.Qnt with that of Mens utter Inability, while //2 //State of Nature, to perform any truly holy. A6lionsi£;ii?^(?tfwr, .P. 135, CHAP. XVII. T^kat Grace is not given according to Works, is no Ways ijiconfifent with the Hypothefis hy me defended. P. 1 42 . C H A P. XVIII. T'hat the beft Adions f the Unregenerate are net pro- perly called Sins ; nor are they uncapable of beingCon- ditions f the Covenant of Grace. P. ia8. CHAP. XIX. The Dodlrine pleaded for, no Ways inconfftent with that of Pra:;deftination, and the fovereign Freedom of the Grace of God in the Salvation cf kis^lcdt. P. 153. C H A P. XX. That Perfons who have long refiPced and quenched tlie Holy Spirit, and fo ^pvowokcdi him to depart ^r^;;/ them, may at lajl feek earneitly for Mercy, and not obtain it, 710 Argument againjl what I plead for. Here of tlie unnardonable Sin. P. 16^. C H A P. 6 The CONTENTS. CHAP. XXL Wherein the Power of Man, with Relatioyi to the Con- dition 071 which Salvation is offered to him in the Gof- pel, is further confidered, P. 170, PART III. "That the Doftrine ^naintained m the two for- mer Parts of this EJfay^ is a Truth of very great Importance, and 7nany Ways ufefuL P. 177. CHAP. L The First Use of the Truth afjerted, that it gives Light to many Texts of Scripture, which cannot be well underfiood without it, P. 178. CHAP. II. The Second Use of the Truth maintai7ied^ that it re^t- ders the Offers of Salvation 7nade to Siimers in the Gojpely very plain and intelligible. P. 182. CHAP. III. The Third Use of the Do6lrine i7tffted on, that it gives US a very pleafant and endearing View a7id Prof- peft of the imparallePdlaOwc of God, in fi7idi7ig ont^ providi7tg a7id revealing fuch a Way of Salvation, as that made k7iown in the Gofyd, P. 186. CHAP. The CONTENTS. 7 CHAP. IV. The Fourth Use of the Truth injijied on, the En- couragement give?i to awakened Sinners, to feek ear- nefily to Gqt> for his fpecial Mercy. P. 189. CHAP. V. The Fifth Use of the Truth maintained^ that it takes from all thofe who refufe the great Salvation offered in the Gofpel, every Plea in Excule for themfelves. P. 1 9 2 . C H A P. VI. The S-txTH Use of the Truth pleaded for ^ that being allowed, it does^ without any Difadvantage to the cal- vinian Scheme, remove out of the Way the greatefi Difficulty that attends it \ and renders it more eafy /^ ^^ received ^;^^ defended. P. 194, CHAP. VJI. The Seventh Use of the Dodrine pleaded for ^ an Exhortation, it^/zZ^ Diredions, to fiich as are yet in a State of Nature, to comply with the Terms on which ?>?\w2ii\on is offered to them in the GofpeL P. 199. fcVV* ^AT'j J^^ '-''vV* »/V\j JV't vv^ vtaj t/'aFV* •.^>* CyDGYDGYD t/v\t t/(T^ Jfr* CTYDGYb A(k>ertifement. u WHEREAS, in Part I. Chap. I. Page 12. of this Elfay, I have profeffed my Affeiit to what is aiTerted by the Ajfemhly of Droi?ies at IVe/iminfler, m their ShorftT Cafechif?n, viz. That '' The Covenant " being made v^ith Adam, not only for himfelf, but " for his Pofterity, all Mankind proceeding from him *' by ordinary Generation, fmned in him, and fell v/ith " him, in his firft Tranfgreliion ; " I have, on a Re- view of the Sheets printed off before the Vv^riting of this Adfcertijement, chofen to exprefs my Senfe rather in the Words here following, than thofe of the Affembly referred to, viz, " That the Covenant being made v/ith " Ada-m, not for himfelf only, as an individual Perfon, '' but for the w^hole human Species then in him, the " Confequence hereof was, that all Mankind procee- " ding from him by ordinary Generation, finned in '' him, and fell with him, in his firft Tranfgrefiion. This being my tme and only Senfe in the Place re- ferred to, I defire that all other PaiTages in the Book, of the like Import, may be underftood v/ith this Expla- nation. ^####### ^##^#### ^s^g}s^yss:^!S^m^^^^m Grace Defended. PART L The firft Part of that Defence of the Grace of God which, in this ElGTay, I am attempt- ingj is to fhew, #^ Tha^ Sinners have^ in the Gofpel^ an Offer of Salvation made to them. CHAP. I. Concerning thofe Sinner s^ and the State they are in^ to whom the Offers of Salvatio?i are here fuppofed to be made. H A T we may underftand what we fay,and whereof we affirm, in this firft Part of my Difcourfe, we muft in the firft Place confider, Who the Sinners are, and in what Condition, to whom Salvation is fuppofed to be offered in the Gofpel. To this then I fay in general, That the Sinners here intended, arc fuch as all Mankind fallen in Adam^ by Nature, are ; or as confider'd in that Eftate, into which the Fall has brought them, I do not here ^ Grace defended. Chap. \. fay, Tliart the Offer of Salvation is made to all that are in this Eftate % but that all unto whom the Offer of Salvation is fuppofcd to be made, are of this Number ; and fuch an Eftate as this they all, by their Fall" and Apoftacy from God, have been plunged into. Nov/, tliitt this is a \ ery miferable and wretched Eftate, is by all Calvhiifis i^cknow.ledged j and in this I, fully agree with them ; and Ihall endeavour, as briefly as I can, to flicvv wherein the Adifery of this Eftate does confift. And to this End, I fhall laere take -a fliort View of the VVretchednefs of that Eftate, into which Mankind liave, h)' their Apoftacy, brought themfelves. To this End, the ft rft Thing I fholi obferve, is. That the Sin of our firft Parents in eating the forbidden Fruit, was exceeding great a-nd, heinous. It was a &in againft an exprcfs and pofitive Comma.nj of God, immediately and plainlv given to them by God himfelf, to which thfjy were, on their Peril, required to yield Obedience, Gen, 1. 17. So that it was a Sin againft Light and Knowledge, and a very prefumptuous Sin. It was alfo a Sin againft the moft endear- ing Difcoveries of the Goodnefs ofGodtothem. God had newly created them in his own 7772^^^ and Likenefs^ Gix\. i. 26, 27. and in his Favour, with Dominion over the Works of his Hai,i^ j and had plainly enough, for them to underftand, promifed Life to them on Condition of their Obedience to him ; tho' this Fromifc was only implied in the contrary Threatning, Gen, 2, 17, They wanted not Power to keep this Comm.andment ; but might have continued in their Obedience to it, if they had watched and piayed, that they might not have fallen iiito Jhnptat'wi ; and endeavoured to withftami the [fame : This, I think, none will deny. They had .no- Need to cat of the Fruit forbidden them, having Plenty enough beftdes, no other Trees in that rich and plentiful Garden being denied to them. They had no Need, nor Warrant, to feek after a better Condition, at prefent, than that they were in. They had, no doubt, before they had fmned, enjoyed happy Communion v^ith God, and one with ano- ther. They had no Warrant to hold a Parly Vv'ith the Serpent en- deavouring to entice them from their Obedience and Allegiance to their- Creator and fovereign Lord ; much lefs to believe him in what ii0iaid, in diredl Oppofition to that God that cannot Lie ; and fol- low his Condu6l, in direct Oppofition to the divine Command, It was enough for them that God had created them in his own Image, in Refpt-6l of Knowledge, Rightepufnefs and Holinefs. They fhould not have afpired to have been more like God in Knowledge,- ^aa he n>ad$ thgin, or rather to be equal to him, as in Gen, 2. 5, 6. Noi Chap- I. Grace defended. 3 Nor flioiikl they have taken Part with the Devil to this End. Thus iieinoiis was their TranfgrefHon \ and much more mi^ht |iere be faid. This is that Sin q{ Adam^ which is, by Cahini/is^ fuppofed to be iin- puted to his Pollerity, which I, at prefcnt, take for granted, but may confider hereafter. What I fhall here next mention, fhall be fome of the immediate , and neceflaryEftec^s,orConfequents of this now-mentioned hcinousSin : I mean fuch Confequents as followM naturally from the Crime com- mitted, without any Confideration of the T'/;r^^/«/w^ denounced, in Cafe of Difohedience : That fliall anon be confidered. Now this could not but produce extraordinary Shame and Horror, unlefsGod had (which was not thcCafe) given uptlns^Tenders to a mofi: unaccountable Stupidity. I fuppbfe God had a Defign to make the Promifebf the Seed that was to break the Serpent's Head, Gen. 3. 15. very wclcomb •to tliem. . ' " We may accordingly fee what Shame and Confufion of. Face feized on them. Gen. 3. 7, 8, 9, 10. And the Eyes of them both wer^ opened^ and they knevj that they were naked ; and they fevjed Fig-Leavej 'together^ and made themfelves Aprons. And they heard the Voke of ilif Lord God., walking in the Garden^ in the Cool of the Day \ A'i Adani and his Wife hid themfelves from the Fre fence of the Lord God., among th^ Trees of the Garden. And God called unto Adam, and faid unto him^, TFhere art thou P And he faid., I heard thy Voice in the Garden : And I vjas afraid ; hecanfe I was naked., and I hid my felf. Nor did theShame or Confufion which thefe Offenders were thus in, .arife wholly, (Tf principally) from tlie Threatning that had been denounced ; but very much, (efpecially their Shame) from a Senfe of the moft vile Wick:- ednefs whereof they had been guilty. This feems evident from the QuelHon God put to Adam., ver. 11. And he faid ^ Who told thee that thou ivaji naked ? Hafl ihou eaten of the Tree ^ ivhereof L commanded thee that thoufhouldjl not cat. •. ■ , So heinous was this Offence, which was by thefe conimitted, that they could not but be in great Horror on the Account of.it 3 tho' they had tho't nothing of the Evil threatned againft tiiem. Nor could they have had any great Reafon to hope for a Pardon, tho' they had never been threatned ; and tho' they could not have known what Punifhment God would have laid oii them : And yet I acknowledge, there v/ould not have been Ground for utter Defpair. I fhall therefore now come to confider their Guilt, as this fignifiqs an Obligation lying on thcrn to bear the Punilhmeut due to them by \ ■ ' B 2 Virtue 4 Grace defended. { chap. l Virtue of that San£lion of the Law, In the Day thou eatefl thereof^ thou Jhalt furely die. Guilt, I think, may be taken, either for a Per- fon's being truly chargeable with fome Sin or Crime ; and this the Perfons were, of whom I here fpeak, of which before : Or it may be taken for that Obligation, by which the Offender is bound to fufFer the Penalty due to him for his Offence ; and this is that which I am here to confider in the Cafe before me. What was intended by the Death threatned, I am not yet come to take an Account of; but the Nature of the Obligation, and the Confequences thence arifing, is what, at prefent, I am upon : And this is exprefs'd in fuch ftrong Terms in the Text mentioned, that the Offenders, I think, had no Grounds given them to hope that the Sentence might be reverfed. I mean, they had not, before the Seed of the JVcman was promifed. Gen, 3. 15. No wonder then that the Offenders were in fuch a Plight as they were. Gen, 3. 11. The Covenant of Works was doubtlefs given to be a {landing Rule, according to which God was refolved to deal with Mankind ; and by which he obliged himfelf to give them Life, in Cafe of conftant and perfe6l Obedience to him, and afTured them that they (hould die in Cafe of the leaft Failure or Difobedience, as by comparing Gen, 2. 17. with Gal. 3. 10, 12. and James 2. 10. does appear. And God was pleafed to try Man's Obedience in one fmgle Liftance, before they had committed any other Offence againft him. Now on this Trial, they molt vilely forfook their Allegiance to him, and wickedly rebell'd againfl him : Which, having done, for any Thing that did appear, there was nothing to be expe£led, but the Execution of the threatned Sentence on them. They were for the prefent bound over, as the fallen Angels were, with whom they had joined againft God, unto the Judgment of the great Day \ and had no Reafon to expe6t any Thing better than what, in the Threatning, God had denounced againft them. The Day of their Probation was now ended, and the Covenant broken betwixt them and the great God, and no Repentance or Obe- dience was by that Covenant now requir'd of them : Nor had they any other Relation to it, than that of capital Offenders, doom'd to prefent Death by it : Nor was there yet any Way of Efcape propos'd to them ; nor, as far as did appear, any Room for God to treat with them, or they with him, on any Terms of Reconciliation v/hatfoever. This was the State in which Mankind now were, and they doubt- lefs were fenfible how Matters (food betwixt God and them ; and they had Reafon to be filled with Dread and Amazement, as it feems they Part I. Chap. I. Grace defended. they were. Nor had they any Room or Hearts to beg for a Pardon. What a terrible Condition was this ? They were, in Refpeft of the Sentence pronounc'd againft them, as dead Men, as foon as ever they had fmned. But the Mifery of thefe Tranfgreflbrs will further appear, if we confider what that Death was, which, by the Sanation of the Law, they were thus bound over unto. And this I (hall now proceed to fhew ; only I ftiall here firft obferve, that the Death threatned againft thefe TranfgrefFors did not, properly fpeaking, conlift at all in the Obligation they were under to fufter it. For tho' fuch as are under a Sentence of Death, are fometimes fpoken of as dead Men, as was before obferved ; yet there is a Difference between Men's being under a Sentence of Death, and their actually dying ; or betwixt a Judg- ment pafled on them, and the Execution of it : However, a Sentence of Death is very terrible. And now I may, without any further Delay, fhew what Death thefe Malefactors were by the Law of God fentenced unto. I fay then, thefe were, by the Threatning annexed to the Law of God, Sentenced to undergo a threefoldDeath, which I fhall fpeak fomething concerning in the Order now to be exprefled. And, I. Thejirji Kind of Death intended in the Threatning, undoubt- edly was that which we commonly call Death fpiritual. That Mankind are by Nature fpiritually dead, the Scriptures abundantly teftify : And for the clearing up of what I here affert,! (hall fhew (i.) Wherein this Death does confift. (z.) That this came on our firft Parents as a Punifhment of their Sin, in eating the for- bidden Fruit. (i.) Let us confider wherein this Death confifteth. Now to this I fay, that this Death confifteth in the Lofs of the Lnage of God, which Man was created in, Gen. i. 26, 27. or that Rectitude or Integrity, of which he was the Subje<5l, when he was in that Eftate wherein he was created. Eccl. 7. 2g. God made Man upright. This did not confift in the Eflence of Man's Soul ; for if it had, he could not have loft it : But it confifted in that habitual Conformity of the Soul to the holy Nature and Will of God, which was con- created with it, and was the Bond of its Union with God, while Man enjoy'd it ; for he that is joined to the Lord is one Spirit with him, I Cgr.h, I -J, This was Man's Life, while he was in a State of Lmocency i Grace defended^ CIiap. 1, Innocjeilcy ; and is fo again, when he is renewed in Knoivledge and Righteoufnefs afur the Image of him that created him^ Col. 3. 10. Men deiHtute of it are faid to be alienated from the Life of God^ Eph. 4. 18. To be without this is Death, Rom. 8. 6. lliis Principle of Life is in Scripture call'd the divine Nature^ 2 Pet. i. 4. The Seed of Gsd^ I John 3. 9. Thafe who have it not, h^vc not eternal Life abiding in ihern, ver. 15. but on the contrary, are dead in Sins^ and i it the Uncircumcifion of the Flejh^ Col. %. 13. When fuch are faid to be dead ; and when their Deprivation of fuch a divine Principle is called Death ; thefe Expreffions are, I acknowledge, metaphorical ; and the Metaphor is taken from the Likenefs which there is, in fomeRefpe6ls, betwixt a proper Death :and this. Men, in this Eftate, being as uncapable of performing arty A6lionsthat are truly fpiritual and holy, as Men naturally dead arc of performing the At^^lons' to which natural Life, is required, Rom, 8.' 6, 7, 8. For to he carnally viinded is Death'. But to be fpiritually minded is Life and Peace t, becmtfe the cctrnal Mind is Enmity <^g^'^^fi ^°^^ '• ^^'^' ^^ ^^ '^^^ fid)jeSf to the Laiu of Gcd^ neither indeed cm be. So then they that are in' the- Flejh ccihno^t plea fe God. I Cor. .2. 14. But the natural -Man riceiveth not the Things of -ilk Spirit of God, for they are FooUJhnefs imto him : Neither ran he knoxv them^ hecaufe they ar^ fpiritually -difcerned. This Death 'does not, pro^ ^erly fpeaking, coniili: either in Men's doing that which they ftiould not, or in omitting or neglefting that v/hich they (hould do i,but in their Want of fiich a Priiiciple as is necefiary to their doiing ■ that which is, in a ftri6l Senfe, holy and good^; and in a right Mannei" avoiding to do the contrary, /. e. from a Hatred of it, and a Love to that which is good. This, I think, is too plaih to need any Illuftra- tion. Thus briefly of this Kind of Death. (2.) I am to fhew, That this came on our frjl Parents, as a Panilhment of their Sin, and that it belong'd to the Death threatned. I fay hwr firfl Parents ; for as vet I confider not how their Pofterity became in this Senfc dead. 'Jliat Adayn and his IFifevJcrc thus dead, immediately after they had committed their firft and great Offence, I think td be an evident Truth. If they had remained liabitaally holy after they had committed their firft Sin, thdy would ' certainly havQ carried themfelvcs far otherwife than they did. They would not have attempted to hide thcmfelves from God, as they endeavoured to do^ Gen. 3. 8. In which they difcovered much Atheifm, and very wron^ Thoughts of God, from whofe Prefence it is impoflible to hide, fer, 23. 24. Pfal. 39. 8,— 12.) inftead of lamenting and confefling their heinous Offence, and juftifying God 5 -as' by the Law of the^ Creation, Chap. I. Grace drfended. ^ Creation, (but not as5a Covenant of Woi^)-' tftey vp'efe dbllged to do. They moft wickedly endeavoured to juftify -themfc^lVei, -andf* caft ' the Blame of their Fall on the God that made them, ver. 12, 13. .So fhat by this Carriage of their't;, they gaveOccafion for fuch a Reflection on them as that in Job 31. 33. If I cavcred-my Tranfgrejjion as Adam, hy h'ld'mg mine Iniquity in my Bofom. Docs it not now appear^ that thefe had, immediately after their Val), a very corrupt Nature ill them? And indeed, if by Adam's firft Offence all- Mankind were made in this Senfe Sinners, as 'in Rom. 5. ^2, and ver. 19. how 'carl it be thought poflihle that he ihould himfclf efcape becorhing fupb iA OwQ^ when he had committed that heinous TranfgreiHon ? ." ' * '.*1^ But we rriuft a little confid^r iik3w -this came to be tHe'-GDnrequerrcffe of our firft Parents com4Tii¥ting their firft and'great Gffen'c^. r'Afii here. I will fhfew,- firji negatively, from whence this did not arifc" j iiiid Jecondiy pofitively^ what was the Caiife bf it. • I. Negatively, I fay, Thi's did/jior-i^vf Wholly rtor priMc'ij^all^ from the natural Influence' of that ^in; ' \\n-rfeh iney haH riewTy ccfn- mitted. Tho' finfut Actions naturally- jVrodtice and inx:re?ife an illi- clination or Difpofition to fin yet more"; and ff tbey^tK^'ofen repeated'^ they -beget a ftrong Habit, inclining the TrsEnfgrefTbri to go on'ftili in their wicked Cou;rfes, as in Jer. 13. 23. Yet the Sin of thefe Perfons could not alone utterly eradicate all' pious Difpofitions out of their Souls. Sinful Ac-tions divcrfe Times repeated would fc^^ree of itfelf have done this ; much Icfs could one finglb' A61 of DifofejediencQ have had 'fuch an Influence, if there had been nothing 'elfe in thii Cale ; but Jda??i might, and it is very ^ probable he would, this not- withftanding, have bitterly bewail'd his Fall, and earneftly begg'd the Pardon of it ; and perhaps have oBtainM' it, 'artd then had grown more watchful and circumfpecSl in his after Converfation, as" is: oftert the Cafe of good Men now : But i-t was far from being thus wid\ him : Sin haxj imlnediately Dominion over him, and reigned . m'hifiij Wherefore, ' ■ :>/ ,■■ . - • \ .2. TheReafon hereof was th!S,God having threatned hcdiould furc- ly die in thcDay he finned ; and being greatly provoked at liim for thf- horrible,. Wickednefs be had committed^ (of which berore)"^id 'impie" diately begin to execute the Sentence on bim, which he vvis now fallen under: And this he did in the firft Place, by utte;-ly.'t2kfng his holy Spirit from him ; the Confequence of ' whidi was, that he inmediatelv,.and without anv pofitive A6tof God, infufiiig any-finful • -'i Difpofitions 8 Grace defended. \ ch^p. J; Difpofitlons into him, became a moft vile Mifcrcant j a Child of the Devil, full of all Wickednefs. If we confider thefe Things following, it will appear that it muft needs have been fo. (i.) God had obliged himfelf by his Word immediately to flay him, if he finned againft him, with this only Re- ferve in his own Breaft, unlefs a Mediator fhould interpofe to offer Satisfaction for his Offence, and reprieve him from prefent Deftruc- tion. We know certainly by the Event, that there was this Excep- tion ; and the Apoftle fhews plainly, in Rom. 3. 25, 26. that God could not in Jultice have fpared him, in any other Way, The Threatning was abfolute, and exprefs'd in the ftrongeft Terms ; and was to be immediately executed. To imagine it only fhew'd what the Crime defervcd, feems to me to be moft vain. (2.) Man being in fuch a State of Condemnation, it would not confift with either the effential, or redloral Holinefs of God, to hold any fuch Communion with him, as he does, and will hold, with fuch as are his Friends and Favourites. He was a Traitor againft the King of Heaven, and by Law condemned to Death for his Crime. How can we now imagine, that God might, while he was under this Sentence, deal with him as with a Friend and dear Child, with whom he was at Peace, when yet he was under his Wrath. (3.) Yet it muft have been thus, if Adam after his falling under a Sentence of Death, had remained a holy Man ftill, being ftill endowed with God's Image, tho' but in fuch a Mea- fure, as the leaft of Saints now are. If Ada?n.^ after his Fall, had had but a Spark of true Holinefs remaining in his Soul, he muft ftill have had holy Communion with the bleflcd God ; and God with him : That muft have ftill been the Language of his Soul, in Pfal. 73. 25. Whom have I in Heaven hut thee f And there is none upon Earth that I defire beftdes thee : And of God, with Refpe6l to him, it might have been truly faid, as in Pdxl. 147. 11. The Lord iaketb Pleafure in them that fear him. This cannot be denied to hold true with Refpedl to all fuch as truly fear God. Now it was impoflible that Adam ftiould have enjoyed fuch Favours, while under a Sentence of Damnation, It followeth (4.) That our firft Parents being fallen under a Sentence of Death, could no longer enjoy thofe Influences of the Spirit of God, by which their habitual Holinefs might be preferved ; or, in other Words, they could not have remained Te?nples of the Holy Ghoji ; but muft needs have been utterly and immediately deferted by him. That muft and did now befall him, which David fo earneftly depre- cated, in Pfal. 51. II. Caji ?ne not away from thy Pre fence'. And take not thy holy Spirit from m.e. And being thus fgrfaken, they were indeed no Part Chap, S; } Grace defended. no better than the fallen Angels, wrth whom they had joined In their Rebellion againft the holy God. Being thus wholly dead in Sin, fpiritually dead, they were in this Refped Vellels of Wrath fitted for Deftru(5lion. I defire it may be here remembred, and laid up in our Minds, to be recolleded and improv'd. That the fpiritual Death, of which I have been fpeajcing, did not precede, or go before, that Sentence of Death, Gen, 2. 17. but belong'd to the Death there threatned, as the Wages of Sin, even of Jchmi's adual TranfgrefTion, in eating the for- bidden Fruit ; becaufe from hence it followeth, thut this Sentence of Death muft be taken ofFfrom the Sinner, before fpiritual Life can be again reftored to him. Before I pafs to the next Head, I fhall here briefly obferve, that as this fpiritual Death did not properly confift in Adam\ firfl Tranf- grefTion, but was a Fruit of it ; fo neither does it properly confift in thofe acftual Tranfgreflions which Sinners in a State of Nature do commit ; but is the Fountain from which they flow, Matth, 15. 19. and Luke 6. 43, 45, 46. Let it be here alfo obferved, that the Dominion which Man's fpi- ritual Enemies had over him after his Fall, tho' comprlfed or implied in theDeath threatned to be executed on him ; yet was it not properly Part of that fpiritual Death, of which I have been now fpeaking : But Man's firft Sin, and the fpiritual Dtath that followed thereon, was what has given the Enemies of Men's Souls, fuch an Advantage as they have over all thofe who are dead in Sin. Of the great Power of thefe Enemies over fuch as are dead in Sim and Trefpajfes^vi^ have an Account, Efh. 2. 2. 2 Tim. 2. 26. and elfewhere. 2. The fecond Kind of Death mentioned, as threatned a^alnfl: our firfl Parents, in Cafe they eat the forbidden P'ruit, was Death teiiipo- rol\ By which I underfland Death, properly fo Ccilled, vi%, the Sepa- ration of Soul and Body one from the other ; of which Death we have a Defcrlptlon in EccL 12. 7. That this Kind of Death was intended in the Threatning, we have Reafon to think ; for (i.) This is Death, in the moft proper and literal Senfe of the Word, and fo is moff jufHy fuppofed to be here meant ; there being no good Reafon to be civen to the contrary. (2.) This Kind of Death is cxprefiy mentionl^d in the Judgment God pafTed on Adam after he had finned. Gen. 3. 19. (3.) Adam did, and his OfF-fprIng do, generally die this Kind cf Death. (4.) Tho' all Men, without Exception, do not thus die, thtf does not prove, that Adam was not threatned with this Kind of C Death: I o Grace defended. \ ch^p. \ Death ; becaufe their elcaping it may be fuppofed to be owing to the Interpofition of a Mediator. I could give other Reafons for this, if It were needful. For the fame Reafon that fome Men die not at all, Adam did not die as foon as he had finned, viz. the Interpofition of a Mediator, to ofFer Satisfadion for Sin, and reprieve him from prefent Death, and this in order to his eternal Salvation. I know many think otherwife, not underftanding the Threatning, Gen. 2. 17. as I do, but holding the Meaning to be, That Adam fhould, as foon as he had finned, become mortal, grow fickly and in- firm, and {hould at laft give up the Ghoft ; and I grant, that, as Things have been fince ordered, with Relation to finful Men, this Expofition feems to agree well with the Event. But we ought to diftinguifh betwixt the real Intention and Defign of God, the Law- giver, and the true Meaning of his Law. The Queftion here is not, What God really intended to do, in Cafe Adam finn'd ? But, What muft be done in Cafe the Threatning fhould be executed according to the true Meaning of it ? And confequently, what Adam was to expeft if he eat the forbidden Fruit ? Now there is no Qiieftion to mc, but that the Meaning of the Threatning was. That our firft Parents fhould immediately die a .proper Death, in Cafe they finned ; only God did not fo threaten this, as not to leave Room to have the Execution delay'd, in Cafe of the Interpofition of a Mediator ; yea, and to have it finally remitted, in Cafe full Satisfa£lion fhould be given for the Offence. This has been made evident in the Event : But for all this, the true Meaning of the Law might be. That Adam fliould die in the Day he finned, with the Exception only now exprefTed. And it is certain, that this is the mofl proper and literal Senfe of the Threatning, in the Place referred to, and fo what v/e ought not to recede from, unlefs by fome urgent Neceflity we are compell'd to it ; which I hope I fiiall make it appear, that we are not, when I come to fpeak of the Imputation of Ada?n^s firfl Sin to his Poflerity ; and fhew how they partake of the Guilt, and become liable to the Punifhment of that great Offence ; which Doctrine, I fuppofe, the Hypothefis I here proceed on, is no Ways inimical unto ; but that it does, on the contrary, greatly favour it. I therefore now proceed to iliew, ?. Whjit Chap, i! } Gracc defended. i r 3. What the third Death was, which Adam was threatned with, in Cafe of Difobedience : And to this I fay. That eternal Punifh- ment in another Life and World was doubtlefs intended in the Threat- ning : For which \ give the following Reafons. 1. Since Life eternal was by Promife engaged to him, in Cafe of Obedience, fuch a Promife being implied in theThreatning denounced; fo that Adam was to have enjoy 'd pofitiv^e Happinefs, and that for- ever, on the mentionedCondition ; it feemeth not reafonable to think, that an eternal Punillimeiit of Pain and Grief was not intefided in the threatned Death : For thus the Evil threatned had not, in its Na- ture and Duration, been commenfurate with the Good promifed. That, in the Threatning of Death, a Promiie of Life was implied, will not, I fuppofe, be denied : And this Life muft needs have been the fame, or a better than that which Ada?7i then enjoy'd In the Garden of Eden^ which none can deny to have been a Life of pofitive Happinefs. Had Ada?n continued in his Obedience, he would have been greatly deceived, if he had ever been deprived of that Happinefs, and not had a greater given to him. 2. A Suppofition of AdairC^ not being in a miferable State, after this Life, having hnned, and being deprived of all Happinefs, necef- farily implieth the Mortality of his Soul. For unto what End fhould he be continued in Being, if he were to be neither happy nor mife- rable ? And how inconfiftent is this with the Nature of a rational Being, capable of Happinefs, and defirous of it ? For fuch an one to be without it, muft needs be a Torment to him. Therefore, to deny that Adam muft have been miferable after this Life, is, in effedl, to deny, that his Soul fnould have furvived, when his Body fliould have returned to the Duft ; as in Gen, 3. 19. and EccL 12. 7. Now, if Adam's Soul was mortal, why not -other Men's too ? Contrary to Matih. 10. 28. and Luke 16. 22. o- 3. The Scriptures, by oppofing that Death, which is the Wages of Sin, to Life eternal, do fufficiently intimate to us, that that Death is eternal ; fo in Rom. 6. 22. The Wages of ^ in is Death \ hut the Gift of God is eternal Life. Now, can there be any Realon to quef- tion, whether Adam was to die fuch a Death ? Was not the Death 'threatned againft him, the Wages of a moft vile Tranfgreflion ? The Death which he was to die, was doubtlefs the fame which thofe are freed from, who believe in Jefus Chrift, John 3. 16. The Seed of the Woman, Gm, 3. 16. was doubtlefs promifed to fave Adam and C 2 others 1 2 Grace defended. \ c^^^ {; others from this Death, call'd the Wrath to come^ i Thef. i. lo. Jefus zvhich deliver eth us from the JVrath to come. The fame is called the fecond Death., Rev. 20. 6. Should not Jdam have died this Death as well as others, if he had' not been redeemed by Jefus Chrift ? Is not this Death included in that which entred- into the World by Adanis firft Offence ; Rom. 5. 12. And if fo, was not he himfelf liable to it ? No doubt it was the fame with that everlafting Punifh- ment vvhich the damned are fent into, Matth. 25. 46. Th'efe Jhall go away into everlajUng Punijhment ; hut the Righteous into Life eternal. Having now confidered the woful EiFefts and Confequents of our firft Parents firft and great Tranfgreflion, as thefe related to them- felves, perfonally confidered ; I fhall now proceed to confider them, as they related to their Children or OfF-fpring. And here, I take it for granted, (and do my felf believe, as in the (horter Catechifm of the AiTembly of Divines at Wefiminfier.,) That, '^ the Covenant *' being made with Adam., not for himfelf only, but for his Pofterity, *' all Mankind proceeding from him, by ordinary Generation, fm- *' ned in him, and fell with him, in his firft Tranfgreflion." Now here I might have concluded the firft Chapter, in this firft Part of my EfTay ; (my Defign in it not being to prove thofe Things wherein I and others with whom I therein have to do, are agreed) but becaufe of the great Importance of the Do£l:rine afferted, in Re- fpe(5l of the Influence, Men's different Apprehenfions about it will neceflarily have on their Principles, concerning fevcral other Points of Religion, I fhall cntleavour to give my Readers fuch an Explana- tion of this great Truth, as I apprehend to be moft agreeable to the Oracles of God, and, as I think, will have a Tendency to remove fbme of the Prejudices, which the Minds of many are apt to fiU'd with againft it -, but will endeavour to fay Nothing but what will be co-incident with it. And in the firft Place, I fuppofe the Covenant, in thefe Words referred to, is that of Works, made with Man, while he was in a State of Innocency ; and that this is the fame that God made with our firft Parents, Gen. 2. 17. wherein he forbid them to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil ^ on pain of Death : In which Threat- jiing of Death, there was a Promife of Life, in Cafe of Obedience, plainly implied. God was pleafed in this Precept or Prohibition to try Allan's Obedience to him, as in a particular Inftance ; and in his Tranfgreflion of this, that was verified, Jam. 2. lO- Whofoever fljall hep the whole Laiv^ and yet offend in one Point ^ he is guilty of all. Adam^ ch aI. l } Grace defended, 1 3 Adam, i. e, Man, with whom this Covenaat is faid to have been made, was not Adn?n only, as that Name is fometimes ftri£lly taken for the Perfon of theiirft Man, but ^ovMam, or Man, taken col- leftiv^cly, /. e. the wliole Species of Mankind, Male and Female, as in Gen. i. 28. Job 28. 28. Eve therefore rightly underftood her- felf to be included in it. Gen. 3. 2, 3. Thus, tho' Jdatn was per- fonally fpoken to, yet it really did include his Pofterity alfo ; and there was the more Reafon tj-^at it (hould do (o^ becaufe the whole Species of Mankind did then exift in the two Perfons, with whom at Hrft it was more immediately made. The Perfons of their OfF-fpring did not then, indeed, perfonally fubfift, but the whole human Na- ture, and all that was efTential to it, did ; and fo all thofe that were by God's Command and Benedi6lion to be propagated in the Way of natural Generation, by or fr©m our firft Parents. They have Nothing in them but what eflentially belong'd to thefe. They are only Adam multiplied, according to God's Ordinance, above men- tioned. And Adam^s Children being of the fame Nature and Make as he was, would undoubtedly have done as he did, if they had been put on the fame Trial. But I do not fay, that Adam^s Off-fpring being in this Senfe in him was that which conftituted him their legal Head and Reprefen- tative. It was their being comprehended in theCovenant that did this ; and that they were fo appears by their being made Sinners by Adani's one Offence, Rom. 5. 12, — 19. If they hzd not been intended in the Threatning, as well as our firft Parents themfelves, the fame Death had not come on them for the fame Offence, as it plainly appears it did ; tho' it was the more congruous that they fhould be comprehended in the Covenant becaufe they were Adam's Pofterity, and he their natural Head ; yet that they are afFe6led, as they are, by his Sin and Fall, does immediately arife and flow from their being comprehended in the Covenant, as they moft certainly were. It appears from what has been now faid, Th2Lt Adam's Pofterity were in him in a two-fold Refpedl. (i.) They were in him in a natural S?nfe, as Branches are naturally in their Root or Stock, before they grow out of it. (2.) They were in him in a relative and moral Senfe, as he was their appointed Head and Reprefentative : And I acknowledge, that without being in him in this latter Senfe, they could not have finned in him and fallen with him in his firft Tranf- grefHon". And this is the Reafon why Children now are not charge- able with the Sins of their immediateParents. God has not appointed their immediate Parents to be their moral Head or Reprefentative. The 14 ' Grace defended^ \ chap. l The Covenant being thus made with Adam for his Pofterity as well as himfelf, he virtually reprefented them, before they adlually fubfiiled ; fo that his Carriage, before they had, in this Senfe, any Being, would affe6l their Perfons as foon as they ihoiild cxift. And fmcehe reprefented none, but what were in the Way of natural Ge- neration to defcend from him, none could partake with him in his Guilt, and the Death threatned, 'till in this Way they had a Being : And coi)fequently, if it had fo fallen outjthat none had ever been bro't into, the World, in the Way mentioned^ then none fhould ever have fufFered any Pain or Torment, in Cafe of his eating of the forbidden Tree ; becaufe fuch Suffering fuppofeth the Exiftence of the Perfons fufFering : And the fame will hold with Refpedt to the Reward of his Obedience, had he not fmned : His Pofterity having the Advan- tage of it, did neceffarily fuppofc, that, in order to it, they muft firft .exift,. .... . .. '■■"'// ^ ^ :K^:- V ^ Now Things (landing thus, betwixt the blefled God and Mankind, before Adairi''s> Fall j and Adam having then Power to have continued in that State of Integrity, wherein he was created ; and being liable withal to fall from it, by eating the forbidden Fruit, io^ that, ac- cording to the Nature of fecond Caufes, either of thel'e might come to pafs, and one or the other of them v/ould certainly do fo : We xnay briefly conlider the Effects or Confequents of.each of tliefe fup- pofed Events ; but muff here confider thefe with Relation to that Co- venant whichMan was then in, without anyRelation to theCovenant of Grace made with Man after his Sin and Fall; and thus we fhalLfee how Things muft have been, in either of thefe Cafes, had -no Media- tor been provided. And here firft let us fuppofe, that Adam had ftood and ifot eaten of the forbidden Tree. When I here make this Suppofition, by Adam''s continuing in h;s Obedience, I mean his having done fo during that Time which God had allotted for the Trial of his Obedience to that pofitive Ordinance of his ; on Adarn s Oh(QVV7\.t\Qr\ of which, his own and his OfF-fpring's Happinefs did depend : But how long a Time this was to have been, I cannot determine. God did not, in the Covenant made with Adam^ limit any certain Tme for this, but -kept his Mind to himfelf: Only we know, that in Cafe of Sin, the Time was' out as foon as it fhould be committed. But how long Man muft have continued in his Obedience, before he fhould, on the Terms of that Covenant, have had a Title to Life, I cannot fay : But I think it is very probable, that if Adam had not fallen before he had Chap. I. ] Gvacc defended. 15 had any Iffue, God would not have permitted his falling into that Sin afterwards. For, on this Suppofition, it feems, that fome of his OfF-fprino; would have been born in a State of Sin and others not, (fhould he have had any after his Fall) which, I think, would not agree with the great End which God ainied at in this whole Affair, of which we have an Account, Rom. 3. 19. and moft plainly in Rom, II. 32. God hath concluded them all in Unbeliefs that he 'might have Mercy on all. • ' And to me it is not at all improbable, that if our'firft Parents 'had endured that firft Shock, by which they fell into Sin, God would have confirmed them in a State of Innocency, and not have fuffercd another AfTault to be made on them. 1 know of no Reafon to con- clude, that he would not have done thus • and that,on this Suppofition, Ada?n and his OfF-fpring would have been happy for ever. It is here fuppofed that if our firft Parents had not fmncd, they would have had a Pofterity in the World. That Command and Be- nediction of God given to them. Gen. i. 28. will not admit of the leaft Doubt of this : And that,- on this Suppofition, Adam'% Pollerity (hould none of them ever have {qqvl Death, I think unqueftlonable. Nor do I imagine, that they would all have lived in this little World forever ; but fuppofe it more than likely, that after they had for a Time ferifd their Generation by the Will of Gcd., they would have been tranflated into the heavenly WorW, as Enrch and Elijah * were, and as the Saints that fhall be alive on theEarth, at the fecond Coming of our Lord +, will be. Thus far have I confidered how it would have fared with Ada7ii's OfF-fpring, on Suppofition of his keeping the firfh Covenant ; I fhall now confider what the Effects and Ccnfequents of his breaking that •Covenant mufl have been, according to the Tenor of it"; and "if .a Mediator had not interpofed to .offer a Price of Redemption for tWe Offenders : Of which more afterwards. And to this I muft fay, that I am fully of Opinion, that in this Cafe the TranfgrcfTors mull have been immediately (lain. Judgment mufl have been fpeedily executed on them, there being no Reafon or Room for delayino- it. I am fenfible, that in this I differ from many wife and learned Men, whofe Opinion is, that the Threatning denounced Gen, 2. 17. did not intend that the Offenders fliould immediately fuffer a temporal or proper Death j but that they fhould immediately become frail and * Gen. 5. 24. Heb. 11. 5. 2 Kings 2. 11. + 2 Thef. 4. 17. mortai 3 1 6 Grace defended. ^^nL, \ mortal ; and fhould in the Time appointed by God, give up the Ghoft. But, premifing all due Regards to thofe from whom I differ in this, I fhall fay fomething to each of thefe Hypothefes, that we may the better judge which of them is moft agreeable to the Scriptures and the Difcoveries we have of the Mind of God in them. And firft, with Refped to what I hold, I have thefe Things to fay. 1. That what I plead for feems much better to agree with the plain Senfe of theThreatning, than that which I diflike. TheThreat- ning is very exprefs and pofitive on my Side, and the Terms ufed very flrong and emphatical. In the Day thou eateji thou Jhalt furely die, ovyjhall die the Death. Now I have already fhewed, that a tem- poral or proper Death is intended in the Words, as well as a Death fpiritual and eternal. And all the Kinds of Death intended were, without Exception, by the Words of the Threatning, to be inflifted on the very Day in which the Crim-e was committed. Nor have we any Liberty or Licence given us to leave, or recede from, the plain and literal Senfe of God's Word, unlefs by fome urgent Neceffity ■we are compell'd to it. This was the ordinary Senfe in which the Word Death was ufed, when Mofes wrote the Hiftory of Man's Creation and Fall, and no doubt long before that Time. Nor is there any Reafon to doubt but that Mofes would ufe a Word to ex- prefs the Thing intended in the Threatning, in the fame Senfe that God did therein ufe it. 2. By AdatrC^ Carriage after he had tranfgreiTed it feems that he ex- pe(Sled prefent Death. When Adam and Eve had fmned, they were afraid, and hid themfelves among the Trees of the Garden, Gen. 3, ver..8, and 10. They a6led like Perfons that expe6led to be flain as foon as they fhould be taken ; and no doubt they did fo. And it is not to be queftioned, but that they underftood the Meaning of the Threatning. 3. That God did not immediately execute thefe Malefadors, is no Argument at all,that theSandion of theLaw did not intend it,any more than that the Law againft High Treafon does not intend that a Perfon committing that Crime, fhall be put to Death for it ; becaufe the King is pleafed to reprieve and pardon him. We may well diftin- guifh between the Meaning of the Law and the Intention of the Prince, whofe Law it is. The proper Senfe and Meaning of that Law, Gen, 2. 17. might be, That our firll Parents fhould die a proper Chap, l ] Gracs defended. 1 7 proper Death, on the very Day they finned ; and yet upon the In- terpofition of a Mediator to offer SatisfacStion for their Crime, in or- der to their being reconciled to God, they might be reprieved from the prefent Stroke of Death, and might, inftead thereof, have Con- ditions of Peace propofed to them. Thus God might be gracious, and fay, Deliver them from gohig dozun into the Pit ; I have found a Ranfom^ as in Job 33. 24. and this I beHeve was the Cafe. It greatly favours this, that God would pafs no Sentence on our firft jfarents, after they had fmned, 'till he had firft promifed a Saviour, lihe Seed of the JVonian that was to break the Serpent's Head ; as ap- pears Gen. 3. 15,-19. Had it not been for this, thefe Tranfgreflbrs muft have had quite another Sentence pafled on them, viz. a Sentence of prefent Death and eternal Damnation. . Sdtne have obje£ted againfl what I here plead for. That, on this Hypothefis, the World had at once been deprived of all its humane Inhabitants, tho' it was made for the Ufe of Mankind : And I readily acknowledge this to be true, and know of no Abfurdity implied in it; for if it had been fo^ God could eafily have provided others to fill up the Room of thofe Wretches, who, for fmning againft him, had been deftroy'd. " God (faith Dr. Tiuijfe * ) could have deffroycd Jdam " after his Sin, and made another Author of Generation of A'lan- " kind. " But he never intended it fhould come to this. He knew how to fave the OfFenders from that prefent Delfru(Slion v/hich they deferv'd ; and to fufrer them, in the Way which he had before pre- fcribed to them., to replenifh the Earth with Inhabitants, tho' this was not the Intention of the Threatning before mentioned, in Cafe Jdam had fmned before he had any IfTue ; and fo could not have been done if a Way to fatisfy the Law had not been found out. The Suppofition which I have endeavoured to defend, being allow'd to be a Truth, as I think it ought to be, it will from thence follow^ That if our firft Parents committed their firft and great TranfgrefHoii before they had any Children, as they certainly did, then no Poflerity of theirs could, according to the Tenor of the Covenant of Works, fuffer any Pain or Torment, on the Account of their firft Offence, in eating the forbidden Fruit. The Reafon of this is obvious, viz, becaufe they could not have any. If they had none before they finned, befure they could have none afterwards, being to die on that very Day, — ^I fay, this follows, according to the Tenor of the Covenant of * Riches of God's Love to Vejpls of Mercy ^ Part 26^ Pao-e 19^. D Woik^, 1 8 Vrace defended \ J;;^; \ Works, and fuppofing the Threat ning annexed "fco that Covenant had been executed on the Peifons of the TranfgrefTors, according to the genuine Senfe and Meaning of it. For othcrwife they might have, yea, actually had, a numerous liliie, and thefc all bro't into the World in a State of Sin and Death, as I (hall by and by fhew ; and by what Means this came to pafs, with the Advantages of allowing that this was brought about in the Way liere intended. But, before I come to this I fnall obferve, that tho' Adayn could not, on this Suppofition inlifted on, have had an Off-fpring to fufFet pofitive Pain and Torment on the Account of his iirft Sin ; yet he might, by tra-nfgreffing the Covenant he was then under, hinder an Oft-fpring, which he fliould totherwife have had, from enjoying very great and good Things, which, had he not linned, they might and fliould have eftjoyed. Our firfi Parents were by Nature, capable of propagating their Kind, and had not only God's Allowance, but Command and Benedidion to that End, Gen. i. 28. and if they had continued in their Obedience to God, they would moft certainly have had a large Off-fpring in tlire World, all of which would have been brought into it in a very hapi^y Eftate, as I have before fhewed. Now, by their Sin, they at once hindred both the Being and Happi- nefs of all thcfe.^ confider'd with Relation to the Covenant of Work?. And thus thefe were great Loofers by Adarti^ Fall, (if I may fpeak of Not-Beings, as is ufual, in fuch Language as we fpeak of Things that do exift) They were Loofers, I fay, by being hinder'd from co- ming into the World, and that in fo happy a Condition, as they muft and would have come into it in, if the Sin of Adam had not prevented k. And tho' they could not have complained of this Wrong, if they had never been ; yet fmce they are bro't into the World by Means of the Mediation of the Son of God, they can fee and complain of the Injury done them by tlieir firft Parents, in hindring tliem from being born in a State of Innocency and Happinefs. By what has been faid it appears, That Adam's Pofterity were, according to the Tenor of the Covenant of Works, much afFecSted one Way or other by his Carriage or Behaviour while he was in a State of Probation. If he had not fnined, he would have had an OiF- fpring who would have been exceeding happy : But by Tinning a- gainlt God, he excluded them (as well as himfelf) from that Happi* ncfs, which otherwife they muit and fliould have enjoy'd. He pre- vented them from living a happy Life in this World, and from be- b% Heirs of everlafling Glory in the World to come. Our firft Parent Chap, i, ] Groce defended. 1 9 Parents did, by their firft and great Offence, virtually cut off all their Off-fpring before they were born. As thefe virtually finned in them when they finned, fo they had virtually died in th<^ni (a proper Death I mean) if they had died ; tho' the Th^eatnino; of the Cove- nant of Works had been executed only on the Fcrlon^s of thofe who a«5tually tranfgreffed, ^ Having now briefly confider'd my ownHypothefis,with theEffcds or Confequents of it ; I fhall proceed a liittle to examine that which fbnds in Oppofition to it, vl'z.. That our firft Parents were not, accordino- to the Ten.or of the Covenant of Works, to be immediately put to Death, in Cafe they finned j but were, according to the Nature of that Covenant to be permitted to live fome Time in the World (tho' a very fraU and troablefome Life) and^ to propagate a numerous Iffuc offmful Cieatureslike themfelves, atid thefe all to be brousht into the World in a State of Sin, being full of all Enmitv and Wicked- nefs, mere incarnate Devils ; and being with thofe evil Spirits joined in their Rebellion againft the King of Heaven j being alfo v/ith them jn utter Defpair of any Mercy from God, bound in Chains of Darknefs to the Judgment of the guat t>ay; and yet going on to propagate their Kind, great Numbers ftill dyino; to make Room for more fuch Wretches as themfelves, 'till the whole Number o'i Adam\ finful OfF- fpring fhould be filled up, and then all of this Race, not one excep- ted, our firfi Parents with all their Pofterity, at the final Judcr- ment fent away into everlafting Torment with the De^'il and his Angels, as in Matth, 25. 46. But obferve, that this funpofeth that there had been no Redeemer provided ; and that God had dealt with Man according to the Tenor of the Covenant of Works, r ,^^Je^^t ^e here confider'd, that on this Suppofition, this dread- ful Deftruaion ofall thePofterity oi Adain muft have been wholly owjngtothat one Offence of his, in eating the forbidden Fruit ; which yet thefe Sufferers could no Ways have poffibly prevented, or have faved themfelves from the Guilt of, for thev, in their own Pcr- fons, neither did nor could give their Confent to the Terms of the Covenant made with their great Progenitor ; nor could they hinder Ills iinmng as he did, or any of the woful Confequences of his fo do- ing j fo.that the whole wouM have been, as to them, unavoidable. I fuppofe it will not be denied, that this jiiuft have been the Cafe ofall ^^«;«'sPofterity, on the Suppofition which I call in queftiou. Now. tins IS to. many a very grea.t Stumbling-block, or Matter ot D 2 Offence | 20 Grace defended. \ Part L Chap. L Offence ; and tho' what is by Cahinifs offered In Defence of it de- ferves ferious Confideration, yet I am inclin'd to think, that the Imputation of Adam's firft Offence to his Off-fpring may be better defended on the Hypothefis which I have advanced, than on that .which I am not well fatisfied with : And therefore I have chofen that which I endeavour to defend -, and will effay a little more fully: to clear it up. I take it for granted, That the Covenant of Works was, in the Nature of it, a very gracious Covenant, a Covenant in which the Goodnefs of God was very greatly difcovered ; and fo a Covenant the Juftice whereof might be vindicated againfl all Objedlions that might poffibly be made agalnft it, tho' God had infifted on the Terms of it, without abating one Jot or Tittle of its Demands, or admitting a Sponfor to make Satisfaction on Behalf of the Offenders againft it i and therefore that Courfe in which this may be beft done, and the Honour of God's Juftice and Goodnefs moft clearly and eafily vindi- cated, I think to be the moft eligible. Care being Itill taken that this be not attempted in any Way inconfiftent with any other divine Truth whatfoever. Now this I hope, the Way I have taken is fuited to ; and that I may further fliew that it is fo, I will rriention fomc of the happy Cjnfcqucnces following on what I plead for. But before I do this, I think it needful to fliew, what does not follow from it, at leaft that one Thing does not, which perhaps fome may fufpciSl does, I mean that it does not follow, on the Suppofition for which I plead. That Ada7n\ firft and great Offence is not imputed to his Pofterity. Could I think that fuch a Confequence would fol- low on it, I fliould not eafdy admit it. Tho' it be maintained to be a Truth, that according to the Tenor of the Covenant which God made with Adam^ Gen. 2. 17. his Off- fpring (if he fhould have any) were to fuffer Death, as well as himfeif and his Wife, in Cafe of his fmning In eating the forbidden Fruit':; yet this notwithftanding it might be a Truth, that, according to the Tenor of that Covenant, our firft Parents were to be put to Death, on that very Day in which they fmned, tho' that fhould fall out,, as it did, while they had no Iffue. It is certain by the Event, th?it our iirft Parents were liable to fm before they had any Children : And I think it alfo evident, that God did not any Ways oblige hnnfelf by his Word, to give them a Pofterity, in Cafe they fmned before they had Iffue : Nay, on the contrary, I tliink it evident from what has been cw. L } Grace defended. 21 been faid before, that they were to die on the very Day in which they fhould eat of the forbidden Tree. Now if this be granted, it will not follow from it tliat if a Way were found out to redeem thefe Offenders from prefcnt Death and Damnation, fo that they might live and have an Off-fpring in the World, that then the Children pro- ceeding from them, after they were become guilty, and their Natures depraved by Sin, fhould riot be involved in the fame Sin and Dcathj whic'i they themfelvcs were involv^ed in. This, I fay, will by no Means follow, on the Suppofition mentioned. If they proceed frcm Adam., in the Way of ordinary Generation, they mull ftill, accor- ding to the Tenor of the Covenant made with him for himfelf and Off-fpring, (if any he fhould have) be brought into the World in a State of Sin and Death, the Condition he was in after his P'all. Having now fhew'd what'doesnot follow on the Hypothecs pleaded for, I (hall proceed to fhew what does follow from it. And, ;^;^'-^ I. It plainly followeth from what I would have granted,' Thri none had ever fuffered any Pain or Torment, for Man's flrft and great TranfgrefHon, had the Threatning denounced in the Covenant of Works, been, in it's utmoft Rigour, executed on the Breakers of it, but only thofe who perfonally finn'd in eating the forbidden Truit. This Confequence is moft evident j becaufe, if that Sentence of Death had been executed on Adam and Eve^ according to the true Senfe and A4eaning of it, on the Day wherein they fmned, there could not have been any others to bear the Punifhment with them, ther(3 being none to fuffer befides themfelves : For thefe fmning before they had any Iffue, muff needs, according to the Tenor of the Co- venant they were under, have died without any Iffue as before. I know God the great Law-giver, did not intend it fhould be thus ; the Event fhews the contrary: But this, for ought any thing I Can ye^fee, was themeaning of the Threatning .in the Covenant ; fo that the Tranfgreffors of it, couIJ juftly expect no other, on their breaking of it ; and I fuppofe they did not, tho' God found out a Way to fpare them. It is therefore, I fuppofe, a Miftake, tho' many have fallen into it, That if there had been no Mediator provided, to undertake the Work of -Man's Redemption, there would have been many Mil- lions of People, befides .'/(f/^rwi and Eve., who only perfonally tranf- greffed the firft Covenant, who muft have fuffered the Vengeance of eternal Fire, for their Sin, in eating the forbidden Fruit : They could have had no Pofterity to have fuffered, if no Mediator had been pro- vided. Therefore, 22 Grace defended. \ ^^^^^ \ Therefore, ,.rfi irrft .-i.:;.] IjjlI .■:«5:'i 2. It plainly followeth, on the Hypothefis inlifted on, Th^t all the- Pofterity of the firll Adam are obliged to our great Mediator for their very Being in the World. Had not a Mediator interpofed, and ob- tained a Reprieve for our firft Parents, they muft have been pu^ tQ Death on the very Day in which they finned ; and then none of their OfF-fpring could ever have had a Being. They might, and doubtlefs would, have Ind a numerous and happy liTue, had they not finn'd ; but by finning againft God while yet they were without any, they forfeited the Blefling of Pofterity, yea forfeited their own Lives, and muft have died Child-lefs, if the Son of God had not undertaken to be a Redeemer, born of a Woman, and made a Sacrifice for them ; and then we, who are now their Off-fprting, Ihoiild never have fee^ the Light, but fhould have been, as it were, cut off before we had anv perfonal Subfiftence, tho'- virtually we did cxift in thefe Per- fons, in whom the whole humane Nature was then comprifed : So that if they had been immediately cut off, we had virtually been cut off in them, as virtually we llnncd in them, while perfonally we did not exift. It is therefore manifeft, on the Suppofition infifted on, that we are all beholden to Jefus Cbrift, as Mediator betwixt Go4 and Man, for our very Being and Subfiftence on the Earth. Had it not been for hisUndcrtaking to be a Saviour, w? fhould never have been, 3. It further followeth, on the Hypothefis here infifted on. That our firft Parents, and all their Pofterity, did, by Means of the Inter- pofition of a Mediator to redeem and fiive them, immediately become Subjects of his mediatorial Kingdom. Mankind had, 'till then, been held faft under a Covenant of Works, to be dealt with according to the Tenor of that Covenant ; but now the Son of God, (having been appointed a Mediator from Eternity) was promifed to be a Saviour, in Gen. 3. 15. and fo the Decree was declar'd, as in FfaL 2. 7, and his Undertaking this glorious Work reveal'd ; and began to have its properEfficacy, he being the Lamb wir:t\i2\\y Jlaln from the Fcundqjion of the IVorld. Not that Mankind were hereby immediately difcharg'd from theGuilt of Sin, and entitled to eternal Life ; for they remained ftill fubjecl to thePenalty threatned in the brokenCovenant of Works^ ^tiU fomething might be farther done for them, purfuant to the menti- oned Undertaking of the Redeemer. But what I intend, is, that they immediately became rightful SubjecSls of that Kingdom which the Son of God had, as Mediator, comrnitted to him.^ and which he was afterwajds to deliver up to his Father, as in 16V. 15. 24. It was by paying the Pric^ of Man's Redemption, that our Lord obtained fuch ... a Chap, l ] "Croc^ defended. 23 a Right to rule and govern all thofe, by his Laws and Ordinances, who are the Objeas of his Purchafe : And all the Laws given to Mankind fince the Fall, are properly the Laws of the Mediator, by him given to them, the Price of whofe Redemption he undertook to pay, and in due Time did fo, according to his Covenant with his Fa- ther : And according to thefe Laws of his, he adually governs tlie World, blefling and rewarding the Obedient, and punifhing the Dif- obedient, as is in the holy Scriptures abundantly declaredr As for the Covenant of Works, that berno- once broken, Mankind flood in no other Relation to it than this, that they mufl underco the Punlfli- ^ent threatned in it, unkfs in fome Way confiftent with the Tenor of it, they might obtain a Difcharge therefrom. God never after the Fall of Adajn^ propos'd the Covenant of Works to fmful Men ^s a Way in whkh> they n^ight obtain "eternal Life ; tho' he has fome- 'trmts given thein a ^R-eiprefentatron or the Nature and Tenor t>f that Covenant, that he might convince them how impoffible it Is to ob- tam Happmefs by Obedience to It, as In Gal 3. 10,-12. Yet iincere Obedience to the morai Latv is required in the new Covenant ■and IS, accordmg to the Nature anfi. Tenor of it, necefTary to Man^s Happiness : Rev, 0.2, 14. ; : : ■ ' i^. It t^lbWeth, oh 'the Hypothcfi. for which I plead, Tliat all .m?ns Off-fprmg are bro^t into the World in a falvable Condition. In fuch a Condition, Lmean, as that, in a Way confiftent with di- vine Mice, and the Tenor of the firfi Covenant, they may be cter- mally fai-^d. Nor do I mtend this in fach a Senfe onlv, as wherein the fame may be verified concerning firtful Mankind, before (if I may ^fpeak) a Ranfom wasTourtd f6r t^lem. becaufe it was in the ^?u .? ^""i ^^""^ f"^^ ^"^ P'^''^^^ ^ ^^^y ^^->^ ^^eir Salvation ; which, ifhe could not have done, no Sinner could ever have been faved. But I here intei>d to fpeak of a nearer Capacitv of 'Salvation, on %o Account of a Price already paid or promifdd to be paid, for their Re- demption For by the fameMeans that our greatxMediator procured 2 Reprieve for fallenMankmd,that they might not, on their finning againft God, beimmedmtelydeftroyM, he alfo made V/av for their eternal Salvation ^ .. by paying a full Price for their Red'emption, a Price every Way fufficient to anfwer the Demands of the Law/Vnd to Satisfy God for the Injury done to him : And whereas' the Price ^ m.^ -BOt immediately paid down when Man firft finned ^r.d broke Cove- nant With God ; the Security g'vsn for the Pavmeiit o^ thl." Price, \vas Grace defended. { Part 1. Chap. I, was fuchas the^blelTed God vJ^as as well fatisfied with, as if the fame had been immediately and actually paid. There was no Occafion to leek any farther for a Raufom or Atonement for the Sin of Man- 'kind. Any Man might now be faved, without any other or further Price of Redemption 5 and there was now a Foundation laid for a Treaty of Peace betwixt God and finful Men s and fuch Terms.might now be propqs'd to them, as they complying with, might be juftifiod arid faved, without doing any Injury to. God's Juflicc, as the Apoft]e fully declaretH in Rom. 3. 25, 26. Thus much Dr. TzuiJJeyy z.n^ many of our Englifh Divines of great Note, and not fufpeded as in- dined X.6 Armimanifjii^ have granted and maintained, as I can fhew if Occafion call for it. And lefs than this cannot reafonably be allow'd to be intended in fuch Texts of Scripture, wherein the Extent^fOf •Chrift's Death, with P,ektion to the >ObJe£t of it, is afferted ;'/as in -^a^/.^.5: i^^i^. yy.^^j ^rj^dj o-:r;/;,oo jiblrn orfjfiriJ ,in:iiov 5. It followeth from the Premifes, That all ^^/^w's Pofterity are 'brought into the "World in a .far, better Eftate, than that of Not- Being. Tho' I agree not with them who think that a State of en/d- lefs Torment is better than that of having no Being at all ; yet I prefer ,a State.ofSalyability from.a State of Sin and Death, which fuch as 'may be faved are at prefent fuppofed to be under, to that of Not- Being. Suppofing I am not yet palTed from Death to Life, and that I am not certain that I ever fhall \ yet fmce there is a Way foun^ out, in v/hich I may be faved, /. , as in John 3. 15, 16. E 2 This 28 Grace defended. { Part L Chap. II. This Salvation comprifcth or includeth in it Teveral Things, fome of the principal of which may be here briefly namM and confidered. As, I, This Salvation comprifeth in it, Man's Deliverance from the Guilt of all his Sins, and his being made righteous by the perfedl Righteoufnefs of Chrift imputed to him. Indeed this feems not, in fo f!:r:61: and proper a Senfe, to belong to Man's Salvation, as the other Things hereafter named. Stridly and properly fpeaking, a Man is rather by this entitled to Salvation, than actually faved. As Sin was not the Death threatned in the firft Covenant, but the me- ritorious or procuring Caufe of it, Man thereby lofmg or falling fhort of that perfe6t Righteoufnefs, on which his Title to Life did depend ; fo when a Man is made perfeftly righteous, by having the Righteouf- nefs of Chrift imputed to him, this is not properly the Life it felf promifed to thofe that believe, but that by which they have a Right and Title to that Life \ for of that none are ever made Partakers, without firft having a perfe(5l Righteoufnefs, by which they come to have a Right and Title to it. Hence it was that Paul v/as fo felici- tous that he might be found in Chrift, having on his Righteoufnefs, Vh'il. 3. 8, 9. even the fame Righteoufnefs that is fiid to be z^';//^ ^^w/ upon them that believe, Rom. 3. 22. and which is faid to be imputed ivithout iVorksy Rom. 4. 6. It may moreover be here obferved, that the Imputation of Righteoufnefs to us does not make nny real Change \n our Condition, bat a relative Change only. As when a condemn'd Malefactor is pardon'd, fo that the Law has nothing to lay to his Charge, this does not of it felf fet him free from his Prifon and Chains, but only makes Way for it. He remains ftiU in Hold, and bears the Burthen of his aftlicSled State, it may be, in a filthy Dungeon, 'till fomething farther be done for him, i. e. 'till he have a Goal-Delivery. This notwithftanding, the Guilt of Sin being the Ground of all the Mifery that follows on it, it may, on that Account, be looked on as a great Part of their Mifery that lie under it, being that by which they are bound over to eternal Deftrudtion, and excluded from eternal Happinefs. Now on this Account, Men's Deliverance from the Guilt of Sin may be reckoned as belonging to that Salvation, which is in the Gofpel oftered to them ; and therefore the Scriptures both of the old and new Teftament, do abound with conditional Pro- mifes of Remiftion of Sin, in which a Promife of eternal Life and Salvation is always implied ; becaufe eternal Life always follows For- givenefs and Juftification in God's Sight. See JSfs 10. 43. Pfal. 32. I, 2, Ro?n, 4. 6, 7, 8. Chrift's faving his People from their Sirvs, doubtlefi comprehendeth his delivering them from the Guilt of them. 2. The cha^. il } Grace defended. 29 1. The Salvation offered in the Gofpel compiifeth alfo in it, Men's Deliverance from the Power and Dominion ot" Sin in them. And in Nothing that can be thought of, does the Salvation of Sinners more properly and eminently conlift, than in this. All Men are, by Nature, Servants of Sin, wholly under the Dominion of it. Every Imaginat'iGn of the Thoughts of then- Hearts bjing only evil continually y Gen. 6. 5. Their Hearts are evil from their Youth. What Ser- vants and Slaves of Sin, A4en in their natural Eftate, are, the Scrip- tures largely exprefs, PfaL 14. 1,-4. PfaL 36. 1,-4. Ro?7i. 3. 9,— 18. and elfewhere, as we have fcen, in Part, in the foregoing Chapter ; as alfo how this comes to pafs. . But, now Men's Deliverance from this Servitude and Slavery mufl needs be one great Part of that Salvation, which Jefus Chrlft came to work for them, when he came into the World to fave his People from their Sins, as in Alatih. i. 21, Of Men's Deliverance out of this Eftate the Apoftle treats largely, Ro?n. Chap. 6. efpecially from Vcrfe 16 to the 22d, of which Difcoiirfe we have the Sum and Con- clufion in the laft Verfe referred to, viz. bciug n:zv mode free froin Sin^ and become Servants to God, ye have your Fruit unto Holinefs, and in the .End everlajiing Life, With which Words does well agree what wc have in Eph. 2. 1,2. Touhathhs quickncd, ivho ivere dead in Tref- paffes and Sins. Now, it is in the great Work of Regeneration that Men are thus faved from the Power and Dominion of Sin : Nothing fhort of this will effectually accomplifli it. For this that Text is plain and full. Tit. 3. 5. Not by IVcrks cf Right eoufnefs ivhich we have doJie, but according to his Mercy hath he faved us, by the IFajhing of Re- generation, and the Renewing of the Holy Ghojh When Pcrfons are faid to be faved by the Wajhing of Regeneration, this means, that their Salvation does formally confift in this : Not that this is the Condition required ; for that it is not, but one great Part of that Salvation which is conditionally offered tons, I Ihall hereafter fhew. Indeed our Salvation does not more, or more properly, confift in anyThIng, ' than in Regeneration ; call'd in Scripture, our being created anew in Chrijl Jcfus unto good JVorks, Eph. 2. 10. and curb-ing delivered from ih^ Power of Darknefs, and tranfated into the Kingdom of God's dear Son, Col. I. 13. alfo our being, hy iZhn^, redec?ncdfro?n all hiquity^ and purified unto himfelf a peculiar People, zealous cfGood TVorks, T\t. 2. 14. This is indeed the Qiiickning offuchas are dead, dead in Sin and in the Uncircmncifion of their Flcjh j as in thcfe Texts of Scrip- ture docs appear, E%ck, 37. 14. Eph, 2. I. CrA. 2, 13. Thus all true Saints t^xq faved and called luith a holy Calling, kc. i Tim. i. 9. And herein God manifclts the exceeding Grtatncli> of his Povi^er to- wards 30 Grace defended: \ chap.il wards them that believe, according to the fVorklng of his mighty P/rwer which wrought in Chrijl when he rat fed him from the dead. When this is done for Sinners, they are therein faved. 3. The Salvation under Confideration comprifeth in it, Men's Deliverance from the Power, Rule and Government of their fpiritual Enemies. When Mankind iirft finned againft God, they caft off their Allegiance to their rightful Sovereign, and fubjedl:ed themfelves to the Government of the Devil, and became his Slaves and VaiTals, who defigning their utter and eternal Ruin, by his Enticements, pre- vails againft them, Geyi, Chap. 3. and took them capt?oe at his Will, and frill rules over all fuch as are not delivered out of his Snare. Now this Prince of Devils does, by his Legions of evil Angels, that attend on him, as the Prince of the Power of the Air, ftill work in the Children of Dif obedience, tempting and over-coming all fuch as belong to the Kingdotn of Darknefs 5 and finally deftroys all fuch as are net delivered out of his Hands. Now in Men's Deliverance out of the Hands of this Enemy, (or rather, all thefe Enemies) does their Salvation very much confift. And this their Deliverance was moft exprefly foretold, yea ingaged, in that Promife given immediately after Man's Eall, Gen. 3. 15. That the Seed of the IP man Jhould break the Serpent's Head : By his doing of which, the Seed of the Meffiah were to be fet at Liber t^, when that glorious Promife fhould be fulfilled, m Ifai. 53. 10, 11, 12. and Ifai. 49, 24, 25. which Prophecies were accomplifhed by Jefus Chrift, hi the Days of his Flefh ; and the Praife of God was, on that Account, celebrated at his Appearance in our Nature, by Zecharias, in his Song, Lu.ke Ch^ip. i. Vcrfe 67,— 74. who being filled with the Holy Glioft, prophefied and faid, Blefjcd he the Lord God of Ifrael,/^r he hath vifited and redeemed his People, and hath raifcd up an Horn of Salvaticn for us, in the Houfe of his Servant David ; as he f pake by the Mouth of his holy Prophets, which have been fince the World began ; that we Jhould be favcd from our Enemies, and from the Hand of all that hate us. To perform the Mercy promifed to our Fathers, and to remember his holy Covenant : The Oath xuhich he fiuare to our Father Abraham, that he ivi II grant us, that zve being delivered cut of the Hands ^f all our Enemies, might ferve him zvithout Fear, &c. The Price of this Redemption was paid by our Redeemer, when he pour'd out his Soul unto Death, and was number'd with the TranfgreflTors, ^'c. as the Prophet Ifaiah fycdks, in Ifai. Chap. 53. before quoted. And Sinners arc actually freed from the Dominion of the Enemies of their Souls, Chap, il } Grace defended. 3 1 Souls, when being made Partakers of the Graces of God's Spirit, they are made ftrong in the Lord, and in the Power of his Might ; enabled to wreftle with, and overcome, the Rulers of the Dark- nefs of this World, as is expreiicd at large in Efh, 6. 10. and onwards to Vcrfe 18. 4. The Salvation offered to Sinners in the Gofpel, docs alfo com- prife in it, their Pcrfeverance in true Faith ajid Holinefs unto the End of their Lives. Pcrfeverance in true Faith and Holinefs, is not the Condition on which eternal Salvation is offered ; as if our Salva- tion was fufpended on our Pcrfeverance : But on the contrary, it is contained and engaged in the Promife of Salvation made to every true Believer. Every true Believer, or regenerate Saint, has already eternal Life ^and /ha II not co?ne into Condemnation^ but is paffed fromDeath to Life^ ]o\\,^.'i\.Rom.%.\. Such an one has already performed theCondition, on which Salvation is promifed to him : Therefore hisPerfevcrance un- to the End belongs to his Salvation, and is fecured to him in the Pro- mife.— And how fhould the fame Thing belong both to the Salvation promifed, and the Condition of the Promife ? -— I hope in this, 1 Ihall meet with noOppofition from Calvinifts : And wkh Arminiam my dire£t Delign is not to difputc. And I affirm. That there is no Text of Scripture, wherein eternal Salvation is conditionally promifed, but what promifcth Pcrfeverance to the End, without which Men neither are, nor can be, eternally faved. But befides this, there be many other more exprefs Promifes made to the Faithful, (at leaft plainly implied in the I'exts intended) of Peifeverance to the End. Among many fuch they who pleafc may fee Jer. 31. -^8, 39, 40. //^/. 40. 28, — 31. alfo Chap. 41. 10, 13, 14. and Chap. 49. 14,' 15, 16. alfo Chap. 54. 6,--io. Pfal. 125. i, 2. 5. The Salvation of fmful Men does, in Part, confiff in their com- pleat Deliverance from Sin and all Temptations to Sin, in the Mo- ment of their Death. Notw^ithftanding Men's Deliverance from the reigning Power of Sin and Satan, in their Regeneration and Prefetva- tion from the deftru(ftivc Influences of thefe Enemies, in their Pcrfe- verance, tliey are not wholly freed from indvv-eiling Sin, and Tempta- tions to Sin during this L\u\ \Vh\\c they are here in a militant Stat^, Sin and Satan are fuffcrcd to moled and annoy them, and fometimes, in particular Confli^s, to prevail againft them, and put them to the worfe. The Condition of God'F Children, with Refpc^ hereunto, is fully and clearly exprefs'd by the Apoftle, in Rc;^. Chnp. 7. Vcr. -1-4. -and onwards to the End, and GaJ. 5. i;. But at the Moment of 3i Grace defended. \ Part I. Chap. II. of the Death of the true Children of God, they are perfeftly freed from any further Moleftations fronij or by thefe Enemies, being made then perfeiSlly holy and removed out of their Reach. They are then taker, from the Evil that is here, and enter into Peace, dying in the Lord, and rejiing in their Beds, each One walking in his Uprightnefs, Ifai. 57. I, 2. They rej} from their Labours, and their Works folhiu them^ Rev. 14. 13. their Spirits then being made perfedl, in Refpe6l of their ]:ree€<^€^#€<^^^#€>#€^€^€^# CHAP. Part I. i Chap. III. J Grace defended. 33 CHAP. III. Shewing what is imported iii Salvation s ing offered. be- Hi ^'^"^t^^ AviNG confidered what is intended by that Salvation which, I fay, is offered to Sinners in the Gofpel ; it is neceflary that I now proceed to confider what is intended by an Offer of it. Now to this 1 fay, in general, That by Salvation's being offered unto Sinners, I intend its being condi- tionally promiled to tliem. I take an Offer of a Thing, to be the fame, in EffecSt, as a conditional Promife of it made to the Perfon unto whom it is faid to be offered. In an Offer ^ or conditional Prcmife^ made to any Perfon, there is fomething propos'd to be done by him unto whom the Offer is made ; and fome Advantage, either explicitly or implicity, promifed to him on his doing what is propofed. I fay, propofed^ bccaufe the Thing may not be required oih'im as his Duty, but propos'd only as the Term or Condition, on which he may have the Advantage offered to him. But, in the Offer of Salvation made to Sinners in the Gofpel, the Thing propos'd to be done by fmful Men is propofed as a Duty^ which they are under indifpenfible Obligations to perform ; becaufe the Thing is required by God of them ; and therefore neceffary, becaufe they cannot be faved without it. That which is required of fmful Men, in order to their Salvation, may, for ought I can yet fee, be very fitly called the Cofidition on which Salvation is offered to them. I readily acknowledge, that there are feveral Sorts of Conditions^ differing very confiderably one from another ; of which DifFereixrcs I fhall have Occafion hereafter to fay fomething : For it is very neceffary that we rightly underftand what Kind of Condition that is, on which Salvation is fiid to be offered ; but doubtlefs we may allow, that the Thing required may be called a Condition, and fo I intend to call it in this Difcourfe ; and I hope it will, in the Iffue, appear, that no hurtful Confequences will attend its being fo accounted and called. F In 34 Grace defended. | [^fp.„;; In this which I call the Condition on which Salvation is offered, I .roniprelicnd and include every Thing that is required of Man, as iadifpenfibly necefTary in order to his Salvation, fo that God will not fave him without his doing it ; and unto his doing of which a Pro- mife of Salvation is annex'd. To be furc, if there be anyThing which if aMan will not doGod will not fave him, that Thing muft be under- ^flobd a'S comprifcd in tl>cConditionof Man'sSaJvation ; a-nd unto whom- foevcr a Promifc of Salvation is made in God's holy Word, the Thing being to be done in order to our Salvation, that Thing is comprifed in the Condition required. — - It matters not whether all fo required be ccvnfidercd as one Condition, or as many, their Conditionality in this Affair being (lill affirmed : But if we fpeak of this as one Condition ; as I ufually do, then what is more particularly comprifed therein, ought to be diftinclly confidered and declared, by what Name foever fuch Things are called, as Faith ^ Repentance ^ Obedience^ fi^^i^g the Lord^ calling on him^ coming to Clnijl^ Sec. And it doubtlefs com- prehends all thefe Things in it, as 1 ftiall hereafter Ihew, removing iuth Obje(R:ions as are apt to be made againft it. And whereas all Mankind may be divided into two Sorts, or People of two different Conditions, viz, fuch as are in a regene- rate and juftified Elbte, and fuch as are not, but in a State of Na- ture, under the Wrath and Curfe of God ; and fo liable to eternal Damnation : it will certainly be neceffary to confider which of thefe two Eftates Sinners muft be fuppofed to be in, when they perform the Condition, en which God offers to faVe them : And this feems to me to be an eafy Queflion, but fince many have, in this, a different Way of Thinking from me, this is to be particularly difcuffed in the fccond Part of this Effay, altlio' it feems well nigh put out of Quef- tion, in the fccond Chapter of this. That what is required of firtful Men in order to their Juftification and Salvation, is well called by the Name of Faith, 1 very freely acknowledge ; and that it is very frequently fo called in Scripture is to me evident : But that it is alfo called by many other Names I fhali fhew, with the Reafon of this Variety — . But whereas fome miflike • the calling of that Faithy bv which we are in Scripture faid to be ju- ftified, by the Name of a Condition ; this may be here a little confi- dered. Some obje(5l againft this Word on the Account of the Ambi- guity of it, there being Conditions of different Sorts or Kinds, fome of which will not, as they think, agree to the Nature and Ufe of that Faith by v»'hich we are faid to be juftiiied. But this perhaps may as well chap.iiI: } Grace defended. 3$ well be abjedleJ agalnft the Word Injlrjiment^ ufed by fome Inftead of it. And fome think that this Word afcribes more to Faith, in the AfFair of our Juftificatio.n, than docs indeed belong to it ; or at leaft, that it does not well exprefs the true Ufe and Influence of Faith, in the Juftification of a Sinner before God. Some therefore exprefs the Influence of Faith in this Aftair by the Word Jnjlrument^ and fome- times call it an injirumsutal Caiije. But the ufe of this Word or txpreflion is alfo tho*t by feveral, to have its Inconveniences ; with whom I alfo concur. A learned and judicious Divine obfervlng thefe DifHculties, as he conceives thjem to be, has thus exprefs'd himfelf in this Matter. " I " humbly conceive, faith he, we have been ready to look too far to <' find out what that Influence of Faith in our Juftification is, or " what is that Dependance of this EflFet^t on Faith, fignified by- this «' Exprefl!Ion of being yw/?y/7<'^ by Faith^ over-looking that which is <' moffc obvioufly pointed forth in the Exprcflion, viz. that the Cafe " being as it is, (there being a Mediator that has purchafed Juftifi- '* cation) Faith in this Mediator is that which renders it a jneet and *' fuitable Thing in the Sight of God, that he rather than others «< iKould have this purchafed Benefit affigned to him,'* viz. he that believeth in the Mediator. Now I willingly agree with this worthy Author, that that Faith by which the Ungodly are fald to be juftified, is the moft 7ncet a.nd fuitable Thing that could have been required of them to that End ; and this was doubtlefs the Reafon why God made choice of it to the Place and Office to which he afligned it, rather than any other Thing whatfoever ; yet I think, with Submifiion to thofe of better Judgment, That this is no Ways inconfiftent with its being called the Condition of Men's Juftification : And it feems to me very evident, that its being fo meet and fuitable a Qiialification, as is exprefs'd, is not that by vidiich a firm and fure Connexion is ertabliihed betwixt a Sinner's believing and his being juftified. The Reafon why all tliat believe are infallibly juftified and faved, is not becaufe the Sinner that believeth in Chrift is fo meetly and fuitably qualified to receive the Benefit of Juftification ; but this rather, that by the Promife of God there is infallible Afturance given, that whofo- ever believeth fhall be juftified and' faved, as in John 3. 15, 16. Mark 16. 16. Jcls 10. 43. Were it not for this, Sinners could not be fure that they ihould be faved on Sup>|^ofition of their believing, were it poftihle, that they fhould believe, having no fiich Promife. So that after all, it is the Conditiofiality of Faith in the Covenant of Grace, that gives it the Advai^tage of being any Ways mftrunK-ntal in .our F 2 Juftification. 36 Grace defended. \ chaI.iil Juftification %. Thus it is by Faith^ that thro^ Grace the Fromife ma^ be Jure to all the Seedy as in Rom, 4. 16. Heh. 6. 17, 18. What that Faith is, unto which a Promife of Juftification is an- nexed, is a Matter of great Importance, and ought diHgently to be enquired into ; and I purpofe, with God's Help, to confider this important Point, before I finifh this Eflay : But this is not what, in this Place, I defign. At prefent I only fay, it is the fame that is re- quired in the Texts of Scripture laft quoted, and in other Places, fliewing what Men muft do to be faved, as in A^s 2. 37, 38. and 16. 30, 31. What is here incumbent on me, is, to ftate and clear up the true Notion of an Offer of Salvation made to Sinners in the Gofpel J and unto this End fomething further remains to be faid. 1. Then, the Condition upon which Salvation is offered to Sinners is fomething required of them, that fo they may be faved j fomething to be done by them unto whom the Offer of Salvation is fuppofed to be made. The Condition required is not meerly this, that if fuch or fuch a Thing come to pals, then God will fave us ; but if we comply with his Will in doing what is required of us, then God will beftow his Salvation on us. It is, I .fay, fomething to be done by us, not by God himfelf, or any one elfe befides our felves ; and this too fomething wherein we yield Obedience to the Call of God in the Gofpel i fomething con-tained in a proper Anfwer to this impor- tant Enquiry, " What fhall I do to be faved ". The Difference betwixt the Covenant of WorkSj and that of Grace, lies not in this, that the Covenant of Works required our doing fomething that fo we might live, but the Covenant of Grace nothing at all. What the Covenant of Grace requireth to this End, is fometlmes called the Obedience of Chriji^ Rom. 16. 26. and obeying the Gofpel. It is fome- thing wherein we perform our Duty to God as well as fecure the Sal- vation of our own Souls. 2. The Condition, to this End required, is not only fuch, that we fhall not be faved if we perform it not ; but that we fhall be faved if we perform the Thing required. We are not only threatned with Death and Damnation, in Cafe we do it not ; but have a Promife of Life and Salvation, if \vq perform it. There are fome Things which if thofc that enjoy the Gofpel will not do, they fhall be damned ; as to inftancc in two or three. If they wiU;not hear or read tlie Word X See JVillard of J nfi if cation^ on FhiL 3. 9. . :. Of Part 1. Chap.III. } . Grace defended. 3 7 of God, meditate on It, endeavour to underftand it, nor at all Regard what is required of them in it ; fuch, I fay, as will not do thefeThings (hall certainly be damned ; but Perfons may do fuch Things as thefc, and yet never be faved. God has not promired,that all that, after any Manner, do fuch Things, (hall obtain eternal Life. But the Con- dition on which Salvation is ofFered, is fuch as whofoever complies with it (hall certainly be faved. 3. The Condition on which Salvation Is ofFered in the Gofpel, muft needs be fuch as may be, and is, performed by all that obtain eternal Life, before they do obtain it. Men cannot, in the Way of a Covenant, obtain a good Thing conditionally promifed to them in it, ^till they have performed the Condition on which that Thing is pro- mifed. But when I fay here, Ufore^ this muft not be underftood, as before, in Time, but in Refpe6t of the Order of Nature, or accor- ding to the Reafon or Dependance of Things one on another : For otherwife, as foon as the Condition required is by any Sinner per- formed,God without anyDelay begins to fave him ; yea, puts him into a State of Salvation, fee John 5. 24. But God will not fo much as , begin to beftow eternal Life on any Man, 'till he has performed the Condition on which the fanie is ofFered to him. 4. We ought here carefully to diflinguifh between an antecedent Condition, and fuch as is only concomitant. By an [antecedent Con- dition, I underftand fuch an one as is defcribed in the lafl: Head, /. ?. one required in order to our having a good Thing conditionally pro- mifed : But by a concomitant Condition, I intend fuch a one as does infeparably accompany a good Thing conditionally promifed, but is not, in order of Nature, before it. Thus, true Holinefs infeparably accompanies the Juitification of a Sinner ; becaufc God regenerates every one whom he juftifies, and that in the very Moment in which he juftifies him. But true Holinefs is not an antecedent Condition of Man's Juftification, not being required in order to it, tho' it b,e infeparably joined with it, and is a Qualification belonging to every juftified Perfon. Hence, tho' God promifes Salvation to all holy Per- fons, yet Holinefs is not the Condition on which Salvation is promi- fed ; nor is any Acl fo, which floweth from a Principle of true Holi- .nefs, and-fo belongeth to our San6tification ; as I fliall hereafter ihew. 5. We ought carefully to diftinguifti betwixt the ASts materially confjdered, in which the Condition of the new Covenant does confift, and the Rectitude of the fame Acts, and tlie Manner in which they muft 58 Grace defended. \ Part T. Chap. III. muft be performed. In this Chapter I only confider what A- fiJer'd in the fecond Part of this Eflay. 6. Again, we muft diftinguifh betwixt what is required in the Condition under Confideration, with Relation to the general and fpe- cial Nature of it, /. e. in what Adts it confifts, and how thefe muft be performed ; and what is required with Refpeft to the Prolonga- tion or Continuance of what is required : For a Man may begin, and for a Time do what, as a Condition, is required of him, in order X.0 his having a Benefit which is conditionally promifed to him ; and yet by his Failure fall flaort of the Good, which, in this Way, he is a Candidate for. Thus our firft Parents either did or might have, for a Time, continued their Obedience to the Law of Works ; and yet, for want of Continuar.ee therein, they fell fhort of Life andHappinefs, and fo ruined themfelvcs and all their Pofterity. And thus I will alfo fhew, that the Cafe may be, with Refped to Perfons that are in a State of Probation, in order to their obtain- ing the faving Benefits of the new Covenant : And yet, I am far from holding a PoiTibility of falling from Grace, in the Senfe in which Arminiam and others plead for it, vi%. that regenerate and juftified Perfons may fall away, and finally perifh. Yet it is true, that Per- fojis may be engaged in fucb a Courfe that they ftiould certainly be faved, did not their Apoftacy prevent it, as I fhall hereafter make evi- dent from ^z^y^, 18. 24. Maith,^\, 13. and olher Places. 7. It is neceiTary that I here further obferve, that the Condition of the Covenant required, in order to the Salvation of fmful A4en, differs greatly from that which was required in theCovenant of Works, in order to Men's obtaining Life. If I mention thr-ee remarkable Differences betwixt thefe it will be fufficient. I. They differ in Refpe<5l of the Nature of the Thing required : For in the Covenant of Works, the Condition required was perfe«5l Obedience, without any Failure, as to the Matter or Adanner of its Performance, as appears GaL 3. 10. But in the Covenant of Grace, .the Condition required is Faith, Repentance, a feeking to God for Mercy, a coming to Chrift for Life, Isc, as will hereafter be more fully declared. \\ -1, Thefe Conditions differ greatly in Refpe£l of the immediafcc End. of their being required : For, according to the End of that re- quired chap.iil } Grace defended. 39 quired in the Covenant of Works, it was to be the very Righteouf- nefs, in the Performance of which. Men were to ftand righteous be- fore God, and obtain a Title to eternal Life : But that required in the netu Covmarit is not, according to the Tenor of it, to be our juftifying Righteoufnefs, or that by which we fhould have a Right unto eternal Life, but is required of Sinners in order to their having an Intereft in the perfeft Righteoufnefs of Another, for their Juftifi- cation in God's Sight ; even the Righteoufnefs of Jefus Chrift, which \s unto and upon all the?n that helieve^ Rom. 3. 22. Such therefore as believe are in Scripture faid to believe unto Righteoufnefs ^ i. c. unto the obtaining of it ^ their Faith not being the Righteoufnefs it felf, that in which their juftifying Righteoufnefs does confift. Read and compare Rom. 10. 10. with Rs7n. 4. 5, and ver. 22. The Particle tranflated in., in the two Texts laft referred to, being the fame which is tranfla- ted /^, in Rom. 10. 10. P'aith therefore, which is unto Righteouf- nefs, is only fo far accepted of God, as that by it we obtain an Latere!!: in the Righteoufnefs of Chrift. 3. And from the Differences already mentioned, it followeth thirdly^ That the Condition req^iired in the Covenant of Grace is, in a Senfe, a gracious Condition, in which that required in the Covenant of Works was not. That required in the Covenant of Grace is fuch as may be performed by Sinners. That of the Covenant of Works was not fo ; but compatible only to the State of Alankind, zvhile in Innc cency. That of the Covenant of Grace is required that fo v^e may become righteous ; but that of the Covenant of Works was required that fo Men might remain righteous, as they then acSlually were. In a Word, that now required is the Condition of a mofi: gracious and merciful Covenant. That of the Covenant of Works was fuch as that Men, in the Performance of it, might obtain Life by their ov/n perfect Obedience. Thus it appears, that the Conditon of the Covenant of Grace is of another Kind than that of the Covenant of Work?. But it does not by any Means appear, that what is in the Covenant of Grace re- quired of Men, in order to their Salvation, is no Condition at all j nor ought that to be granted. C H A ?. 40 Grace defended. | Part I. Chap.IV. i)ir,75Jff-oT the Pro- now, in the C H A P. IV. Shewing^ That there is anOffer or coiidit tonal Promife of Salvation made to Si72ners in the G of pel. 6i(36SG5f:CDt?#AviNG hitherto endeavoured to explain 'M'. r?»' j^^ •& portion under Confideration ; I come n< W^^^^W fourth and laft Place, to fay fomething for the Con- '^§^'^i| ^ H^'^S^ firmation of the Truth afferted, -j/z. that it is in- oM^^I'-^^^Sj' deed a Truth, that God does offer Salvation to '&&&i%>^ ^^"^"^ ^^" ^" ^^ Gofpel J or that he does condi- •^ •»• -is- -.-J- i;*- tionally promife to beftow eternal Life on them. But before I enter on the Proof of this moft comfortable Affertion, it is very neceffary that one Thing, very evidently fuppofed and im- plied in it, be a little explained and cleared up, without the doing of which the main Affertion here maintained cannot be very advantage- oufly and clearly fupported. Now that which I here intend is this, That Mankind have, fmce their Fall into a State of Sin and Death, had fo much done for them, in order to their Recovery out of that miferable Eftate, as thereby to be put into a State of Salvability : For otherwife there would be no Room for an Offer of Salvation to be made to them. Now Man- Jcind, fmce their Apoftacy, may be conceived to be in a falvable Condition in two Refpe6ls, or on a two-fold Account, (i) In Re- fpe' as namely, affirmatively to fome, negatively to others; as thus, " Do you fpcak of Chrift's dying for me, that is, for the Pardon of ^' my Sins, and for the Salvation of my Soul, I anfwer affirmatively <' and fay, I am bound to believe that Chrilt died for the procuring "^' of thefe Benefits unto me, in fuch Manner as God hath ordained ; " to wit, not abfolutely but conditionally, to wit, in Cafe I do be- " lieve and repent. For God hath not otherwife ordained, that I " fhould reap the Benefits of Pardon and Salvation, by virtue oi* \< Chrift's Death and Paffion, unlefs I believe in him and repent '' In i chaI.w. \ Grace defended, 4^- In aitother Phc-e, this learned Au'dior* afTcrting thc.Dcatli of Chfiif; in. the iatne L^ititiide; arni'^ Extetit^ AiklV, (Page ,154)' " 'Tp die'. f(^r' " us, or for all, is to die for our, Benefit, or for the Benefit' of alf: " Now the fc Benefits are of a different Nature, whereof fomc arc '< bcitowed upon Man only conditionally (tho/ for Chrifl's Sake) *•« and they afe the Pardon of Sin and the Salvation of the Soul, and '' thefe Cjod dotli confer only upon the Condition of Faitli and Re-' " pentance. Now I ant ready to profefs and that, I fuppofe, as out " of the Mouth of all our Divines, That every one who hears the '' Gofpel, (without Diftin£tion between Ele(5l and Reprobate) is '' bound to believe that Chrifl died for him, fo far as to procure " both the Pardon of his Sins and the Salvation of his Soul, in Cafe " he believes and repents. " In another Place he faith. That as. " Peter could not have been faved, unlefs he had believed and re- " pented ; {o Judas might have been {lived, if he had done fo. " And the Do6lor referring to that Text, John 3. 16. faith on it. That " it gives a f-iir Light of Expofition to thofe Places whereQirift " is faid to have died for the Sins of the World, yea, of the v;holc " World, to wit, in this Manner, That whofocver belieyeth in him," " fhould not perifh, but have everlaftins; Life. ", '• "■'-'-"' i- ' O , ' • " ' f : ' f T; ».■>>• Thus far I have Dr. Tzvijfe (u\\y Wi&x lix^in'^^dXA ^(^Qxt^ viz That Chrilt died for all Men, fo far forth as to purchafe Life and Salvation for them, in Cafe they believe in him, and repent of theii-' Sins. He did this for the whole World, and hot for the Elecft only":- So there is no Man but what may be fwed on the Terms" ;Qf;tlie[ new Covenant, even Judas was^npt excepted or excli;ded.''7'V ' . ,,"^'■ But here I muft add a Word, left this fhould'Be mifLincrerflooct.' The Meaning of this Aflcrtion is not, that it is a Truth, that Jefus" Chrift died for all Men, if it fhall eventually come to pafs that all. Men believe in him, but that otherv^ife this AlTertion is falfe. It is' ev^n now a Truth, that Chrift died for all Men, or otherwjle that he'^ did not die for all Men. l>iis cahhot: be rnade' either truc.or'ialfe, by Men's future Carriages. The Meaning therefore' of the. AfTertion maintained, is, that Jefus Chrift has really fo'died for all Men, as to purchafe this Advantage for them, that they iliall be laved, if they will believe and repent. It is not fuppofed in what is here maintained, tiiat Jefus Chrift died, equally, or in the fame Serife", for .all ^.lankindj-'Elea and Non-Efecl;..^ The ])ifterence here is wide, and may, I thinlc, be heft conceived of,' by adue Confideration of the Relation of Chrift's IDcath to- thc.tw*^ Covenants, to which it has -a Reference : I mian that of Redemption G 2 betwixt 44 Grace defended. \ chap.iv! betwixt the glorious Pcifonsoftbe holy Trinity, and that of Grace (as it is commonly called) which God has been pleafed to propofe to Mankind fmce the Fall. If we confider the Death of Chrifl, with Relation to the Covenant of Redemption, or Terms agreed on betwixt the Son of God on the one Part, (as I conceive) and the Father and the holy Spirit, on the other, tho' the Father be more exprefly mentioned in Scripture, as concerned in this Covenant, than the holy Spirit : If, I fa}', we conii- der the Death of Chrifl, with Relation to this Covenant, the Son of God did, by his Death and mediatorial Righteoufnefs, obtain for the Ele6lofGod, or all thofe whom in Scripture the Father is faid to have given him, a perfedt and compleat Salvation in all the Parts and Branches of it, the principal of which are enumerated in Rom, 8. 29. viz. Effe6lual Callings 'Jujlificatwi and GlorificaUon : For in the Co- venant here intended, Sinners thcmfelves are not a Party ; and there- fore the Conditions to be performed lie not on them, but on the Me- diator, who undertook for them, and fulfilled the Terms required of him, in order to the Salvation of thofe who were ordained to Life. None of thefe, therefore, ever mifcarry, as might be plainly (hewed from Scripture, were it my prefent Bufinefs. Such as pleafe may read and compare Ija'i. 53. 10, 11, 12. John 6. 38, 39, 40. Rom. 9. 29. A£ls 23. 48. John^, 37. and Chap. 10. 27, 28, 29. Hence the Adis of Chrift's Mediation are fpoken of, as having a peculiar Reference to thefe, in many Places of Scripture, as in John I'j. ver. 6, 8, and 19, 20. and Chap. 10. 15. But fuch Places are not to be underftood as if Chrift died for the ElecSl only ; for befides his ab- folutely mentioning the Salvation of all thefe, he was, according to the Covenant of Redemption which he entred into, to bring the Relt into a State of Salvability, that fo God might be juft in jultifying any of them on the Terms of another Covenant, (that of Grace I intend) •which was to be propofed to Sinners themfelves, is plainly appears, in Rom. 3. 25, 26. with which that well agreeth, Heb. 9. 22. And upon Chrift's doing this are grounded all the Offers of fpecial Mercy made to Sinners in the Covenant of Grace, fuch as are implied in John 3. 16. Acls 10. 43. Mark 16. 15, 16. and A^s 16. 30, 31. And tho' Chrift has by his Obedience and Death, purchafed the Whole of the Salvation of all thb Ele6t, fo that the fame is juftly due to him ; yet they cannot come to the Enjoyment of this Salva- tion, *till they come up to the Terms of the Gofpel, wherein it is conditionally offered to them. How God deals with thofe unto •whom Gofpel Terms are not offered, I am not here confidering : But this I will venture to fay, that I conceive them to be in a falvable State, chIp.iv. \ Grace defended. 45 State, fo that if they are not favcJ, It is not bccaufe Juflice will not allow of it. And I doubt not but that Jefus Chrlft was to bring the whole World into fuch a State as this, and not tiie Ele£t only. And now let us coniiJer the Death of Chrifl:, as it has a Relatiiiii to the Covenant of Grace, propofcd to Sinners themfelvcs. Now as Chriit's Death relates to this Covenant, no Man can plead a Right to the Benefits procured by it, 'till he believes in him that died for him ; nor can he be put in Pofleflion of the fpecial Benefits offered in this Covenant, except he performs the Conditions of it. In this Refpecl Peter and Judas, Eleft and Non-Eled^, are on a Level. He that believeth fhall be faved ; he that believeth not fliall be damned. As the mediatorial Righteoufnefs of Chrill is fufHcient for the Salva- tion of the whole World, fo it is, according to the Tenor of the nev/ Covenant, a Remedy applicable to any Perfon, on the Terms therein pro.'ofed ; fo that it is not contrary to the Juflice of God, effectually to call, juftify, and glorify any Perfon whatfoever. If this is not done for all, it is not becaufe there is not a fufficient Remedy provided, but for fuch other Reafons as are o-iven in God's Word. D But now let us confider the Doctor's Antithefis, in the Place abovo quoted, Page 5. " If, faith he, the Qucflion be made. Whether " I am bound to believe that Chrifl died for me, to procure Faith " and Repentance for me, I do not fay, that I am bound, or that *' every Man is bound to believe this. " And a little below he fdth, '■' I fee a Reafon manifefling that Chrifl merited not this for all, no " not for all, and every one that hears the Gofpel. For if he had, '' ih'jn he had merited it for them abfolutely, or conditionally, not " abfolutely, for then all, and every one fliould believe de fa5l0y " which is untrue ; for the Apoflle faith, (2 Thef. 3.) Fides mn ejl ^^^omnium\ nor conditionally, for what Condition, 1 pray, can be " dcvifed, upon the Performance whereof, God, for Chrifl's Sake, " fhould give us Faith and Repentance. " To this Demand I fhall hereafter anfv.'er. 'Fhus, according to Dr. Tivijfe, tho' the Pardon of Men's Sins and tlie Salvation of their Souls were conditionally purchafed for them by Jefus Chrill, viz. on the Condition of Faith and Repentance, and this for all, without Exception ; yet thefe Conditions were, by Jefus Chrifl, purchafed only for the EkcSl, and are not offered unto Sinners, on anv Condition whatfoever. The litter Part of what he held I fhall h^^eafter confider. T\\:X Chrifl died to obtain Salvation for all Men, on the Terms of the new Govenantj I now take for granted, at lealr fuppc>fe it to be a Truth : And 46 Grace defended. j chap.iv.* And all thofe for whom Chrlft thus died, I hold to be in a falvable Eftate i otiiervvirc, how are they beholden to Chrift for thus. dying, for them t And I would fain be plainly ihewed liow the Gofpcl can be preached to any Sinner for whom Chrift thus died not i Or on what Foundation any Sinner can have Salvation offered to liim, for whom it hath never been io much as conditionally obtained by Jefus Chrift, in the Senfe allowed by Dr. Twijfe^ as above ? May a Sini-icr be faved withtnit having any Price of Redemption paid for him, in Cafe he believes ? Or does this ft ill remain to be done for him, if he fhould believe in Chrift: ? Or may Salvation be fitly offered to him for whom Chrift died not, on Condition of his believing, tho' it could not be given to him fhould he believe ? Seeing God knows that it is r^ot in his Power to believe, having no Objecl fet before him, on which his Faith may be fixed, or any Eye to look to him, if there were, as is required in Ifai. 45. 22. I may very ferioullv fay, I know of no Kindnefs that can be fliown in fuch an Offer, /. e.\n Offer of Sal- vation made to Sinners that are not in a falvable State. But Chrift having died for ail Men, to purchafc Salvation for them, on the Terms exprefled in a moft gracious Covenant, well ardercd m all Things and Jure ^ there is then a Foundation laid for a Treaty of Peace and Reconciliation with finful Men, on the Account of a Price of Redemption paid by Jefus Chrift, as in Rom. 3. 24, 25, 26. where the A'poftle having aftirmed, that all have finned and come fioorV cf the Glory of God ^ he adds, that ive are juflified freely by his Grace ^ ihrd' the Rede?npiion that is in Jefus Chriji : U' horn God hath fet forth to be a Propitiation thro' Faith in his Bloody to declare his Righteoufnefi for the Remiffion of Sins that arepajl^ thro* the Forbearance of God ;'^t& declare, I fay, at this Time, his Righteoufnefs, that God might be jiijh ^ndthe fujliferofkimtioat belieueth in Jefus. In which Words v/e are affurecl, That'Tt would not have ftood with the Juftice of God. to have juftified a Sinner, tho' a Believer, had not Chrift been fet forth, as in the 'Words exprefled. And it will no more confift with the Juftice of God to offer Salvation to a Sinner for whom Chrift died not, than a6lually to fave him without Chrift's dying for him. And Saivatioh might have been as well offtjir.ed to the whole World, if Chrift liad not died' at all, as to any one Sinner for whom he died not. h chap.iv? } Grace defended. 47 How there has been a Foundation laid for the Salvation of fmful Men, or Way made for it, {(^ that it may be done without any In- jury to the Jufticc of God, or any other of his Attributes, yea, with great Honour to them all, has been new fufficiently declared. And the Reafon why the Gofpel is not preached, and Salvation ciFered to all Mankind, is not becaufe all are not In a falvable State, or bccaufe there Is not a Foundation laid in the Mediation of Chrift f( r tlie Sal- vation of any Perfon or People In the World : So that there is no Sin- ner that has not committed the unpardonable Sin, who may not be invited to believe in the Son of God, and promifcd, that fo doing, he fhall be faved. But before I prove, that Salvation Is offered to Sinners In the Gof- pel, there are three Things neceffary to be obferved to clear up, my Way to what Is dcfigned- and they arc thefc here following. I. The Promlfcs of Salvation made \\\ the Word of God, to fuch as are already in a regenerate and juftificd State, are nor conditional, but abfolute. God docs not In his Word {ivj to any regenerate and juftlfied Perfon, that If he {hall or will believe and repent, he dial 1 be juflified and faved. There is no Reafon or Occafion for God fo to lay to thofc who have already believed and are pafTed from Death to Life, and fo are fecured from ever coming into Condem- nation, as In J,ohn 5. 24. Ro7n. 8. i. But they are poor unregene- rate, unjuftified Sinners that have, In tlie Gofpel, a conditional Oi?er of Salvation made to them. Thefe are there told, that tho' they are at prefent In a'State of Sm and Death, yet if they will believe in the Sen of Gody they fiall have Life through his Na?ne^ as in John 10, 31. but that otherv/ife, they flvall die in their Sins, John 8. 24. Indeed there is another Senfe, in u'hich it may be, and is, In Scripture, IJiid to Perfons already in a State of Salvation, it being yet unknown to themfelves arid others that they are fo, viz; '' fuppbiiiVg; *' ye are now true Believers, and In a regenerate State, ye fhali be " certainly faved for ever : As ye be already in a State of Salvation, " fo God will certainly fave you for the future, perfecting in you «« all that does concern you. " He that has begun a good JVcrk in you will perfeSf it to ih.^ Day ofChrift^ as In PhiL 1.6. i Pet. i. 3, 4, 5^ Hereto agreeth that of our Saviom, John 11. 26. (as v/ell as John 5. 24, before mentioned) lie that livclb and helieveth in me ft: all v.lver die. ' The Faith Intended In fuch Places of Scripture as thefe, is not a Condition on v.'hich Salvation Is ofl^'ered, which they already have, but the Qi^ialification by which Perfons may be known to be !!\ a j-iRificd State ; and this Kind of Faith is infufed in our Regene- 48 Grace defended. \ chIp.iv! ration, as fhall be hereafter fhown. Of this Kind of Faith that Text is to be underftood, Johi 5. 24. The fame Kind of Faith is alfo intended, i Jolm i. i. 2. I muft here alfo obferve. That whenever any fpiritual Benefit or good Thing is conditionally promifed in Scripture, which is never beftowed on any but fuch as are eternally faved, under the Name of that good Thing, the whole of Man's Salvation is always compre- hended or comprifed. Salvation is a complex Subje6l including feve- ral Things in it, all which are firmly connetSled or knit together, {q as never to be feparated in any Perfon that is faved. As thofe who are not faved have none of them, fo thofe that are faved have them all : Therefore all of them are fpoken of as Things accompanying ^ahation^ Heb. 6. 9. Hence it comes to pafs, that if but one or two of thefe Things are mentioned, in any Promife of God, they are all necefTarily intended and comprifed under the Name of that Thing, or thofe Things that are exprefly named, as much as if they were all enumerated. There is no Occafion of particularly naming of them ail, becaufe they forever all go together, and he that fhall have one of them fhall as certainly have all the reft. We are not therefore to think, that Salvation is conditionally promifiid in the Texts only wherein it is particularly named: A Promife of Pardon of Sin, of Juftification, of the holy Spirit, of fpiritual Wifdom, refpedively, is as truly a Promife of Salvation, as that, Whofoever helieveth fnall he faved. So v.'hen Salvation is in that Word promifed, all Things which that Term comprehends, as above, are therein promifed. 3. I muft here further obferve. That on whatfoever Condition any fpiritual Benefit comprifed in Man's Salvation^is promifed, under that Termor Condition, the whole Condition of Man's Salvation, or every Thing required as aCondition of it, is necelTarily comprifed or implied. TheReafon of this is very plain. If aPerfon be required to do oneThing, unto which feveral others are infeparably connecSled, in Refpe6t of the Nature of them, and thcirRclation andDepcndance one on another, all thofeThings muft needs be virtually required under theName of that one. Hence whenever God, in Scripture, requires either Faith, Repen- tance, Obedience, Prayer, or Fear, ^V. he requires every one of thefe. A A4an cannot do any one of thefe Things without doing them all \ therefore God, in requiring any one of them, does vii-- tuallv require them all ; and if he annex a Promife to the Performance of this, that, or the other of them, that Promife has a Relation to them all, and they are all virtually or implicitly comprifed in the Condition chap.iv: \ ^rac^ defended. 49 Condition of it. Thus if Salvation be conditionally promifed to Be- lieving, it is therein conditionally promifed to Repentance alfo ; be- caufelihefe Things are infeparable in the Nature of them, fo that ono of them cannot be without the other ; and the like may be faid con- cerning calling on God, feeking his Face, fearing his Name, Iffc, We therefore find in Scripture, that Promifes of fpiritual Blcflinf^s, or, in a Word, of Salvation, in which all fuch Blcffings are compre- hended, are made promifcuoufly to fuch Anions or Duties as I have juft now named ; but by no Means to any of them exclufively of thiC reO, but to this or that in which all the reft are implied, as bcino- in- feparable from it. And it is the more neccflary thus to conceive, bccaufe the Thino-s by God required of Man, are of fuch a mixt Nature, and (if I may fo fpeak) fo blended together, that they cannot be 'ivWy defcribcd or conceived of, without taking into the Idea of them, rcfpectivelv, fc mc- thing belonging to the reft. As to inftancc, we have a Promife that he that bclicveth fhall be faved, Mark 16. 16. But how can we con- ceive of this p'aith or Believing, as wholly excluding Repentance, Obe- dience, and Prayer, bV. from the Idea of it f And how csn we de- fine Repentance, without comprifing P'aith, Obedience and Prayer in it r Is not Faith exercifed in Repentance and Prayer ? And does not Faith give Life and Vigour to it ? We cannot call on hitn, on ivIkiu %ve do not believe^ Rom. 10. 14. Nor is that vvlorthy the Name of Prayer that has no Faith in it, or is not a Prayer of Faith, Jam. 5. 15. And of P^ep^ntancc the fame may be faid. All our Duties muft be mixed with Faith, or they will be unacceptable to God, Heb. 4. 2. and II. 6. If we go about nicely to difiinguifh thefe Things we neither edify our feivcs nor others ; nay, we do thereby but perplex the true Servants of God. When we fpeak of Believers, Penitents, fuch as call on the Name of the Lord, the Righteous, &c. the {?.n\-- Perfons are, by thefe Terms, intended. And it is fo alfo when tlie Holy Ghoft fpeaks of fuch. Thefe Things being obferved, and duly coiitidercJ, I need not fav much to prove. That Salvation is offered or conditionally promifed unto Sinners in the Gofpel. I'he moft that now ren^ains needful to this End, is, to quote and recite fome of the many Texts of Scriotivre .wherein it is obvious that they have in the Gofnel fucli OfR^■r£ of Salvation made to them ; and in what Things the Condition of the new Covenant does confiff. Of the Texts 1 here intend, fome only need to be inierted : th^ reft I fh.dl onlv refer to, that fuch as pleafe may read them. Thofe H whicii 5Q Grace defended. { Shap.iv: which I ftiall recite are thefe which here follow, ^/z. Mark 16. 15, 16. Go ye into all the TVorld^ and preach the Go/pel to every Creature, He that believeth ard is baptized JImll he favcd j but he that belteveth not Jhallbe damned. A6ts 2. 37, 38. Now when they heard this^ they were pricked in their Hearty and J aid unto Peter, and to the Reft of the Jpofles, Men and Brethren^ What Jhall we do ? Then Peter faid unto theiri^ Repent^ and he baptized every one of you in the Name of Jefus Chrifi for the Remijfion of Sins^ and ye Jhall receive the Gift of the Hcly Ghoff. Heb, 5. 9. And being made perfe£l^ he became the Author of eternal Sal- Tjaiion to all them that obey him. Rev. 22. 14. Bleffed are they that do his Co?nmandments^ that they may have Right to the Tree of Life^ and enter in thro' the Gates into the City, Rom. 10. 13. IVhofcever Jhall call on the Na?ne of the Lord Jlmll be faved, Amos 5. 4. Thus faith the Lord unto the Houfe of l(r?iQ\^ Seek ye me^ and ye Jhall live. Pro v. 8. 17. They that feek 7ne early Jhall find me, Matth. 7. 7, 8. Luke II. 9, 10. 4/k^ and it JJjall be given youy Jeek^ and ye Jhall find ^ knocks mid it Jhall he opened unto you. For every one that ajketh^ receiveth, and he that feehth^findeth^ and to him that knocketh^ it Jhallbe opened. Luke II. 13. If ye then^ being evil^ know how to give good Gifts to your Children : How much more Jhall your heavenly Father give his holy Spirit to them that ajk him, Prov. I. 23. Turn ye at my Reproof : Behold, 1 will poidr out my Spirit unto you ^ I will make kncivn my Words unto you. Prov, 2. 3, 4, 5. If thott crieji after Knowledge, and lifteji up thy Voice for Vnderflanding \ if thou feekefl her as Silver, and fear ch eft for her as for hid Treafures, then fioalt thou underjtand the Fear of the Lord, ^/V/ foretold ^ in Eze|c. 36. 25. I will fprinkle clean Water upon you, and you Jhall be clean : From all your Filthinefs, and from all your Idols will I cleanfe you. And the next Words (hew how this was to be done, Ver. 26. J new Heart alfo will I give you y and a neiu Spirit will I put within you^ Sic. In this, as has formerly been faid, Man's Salvation does more properly confift, than in his Deliverance from the Guilt of Sin by Chrift's Blood, which yet is no lefs a Fruit of his Death, than that. By that, Way is made for Man's Happinefs : By this we are, in Part, actually delivered from the Dominion and Slavery of Sin : By that we have a Right given us unto eternal Life : By this wc are put in a(3:u il PoiTeffion of it, fo as never to be deprived of it. See Jo/m II. 26. and Chap. 4. 14. Thus we fee that Man's §^lvation does eminently confifl: in his Resceneration. I now proceed to fliew. That fmce it is, as has been faid. Salva- tion cannot be offered unto finful Men, without an Offer of regene- rating Grace. A Suppoiition of oiFering Salvation to Sinners, with- out offering to them that in which Salvation docs eminently confifl, carries or implies in it a plain Contradiction. Salvation is In Scripture called eternal Life, John ^. 15^ 16. and frequently elfe where. Now there is no other eternal Life mentioned in Scripture, as by God given to fmful Men, but that fplritual Life which is given in Rege- neration. It is the fame, I doubt not, that is intended by our Sa- viour, in John 17. 3. This is Life eternal, that they may know thee ^ the only true God, and fefus Chriji whojn thou hafl fent. The Know- ledge of God and Chrift, in this Place inteadtd, is undoubtedly ;given in Regener^ion, and this is faid to be eternal Life, not as bein^ the Condition on which eternal Life is offered, but bccaufe eterniii Life does formally and eminently confilt in it. It is the great Happi- nefs of all that have it : And they are already in a bleffed State that are the Subjeds of it. So v/as Peter, Matth. 16. 27. Bleffed art thou Simon Bar-jona : For Flejh and Blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father ivhiJ) is in Heaven. Such as foknow God and Chrift may fay, as in l John 5. 2 0. JVe know that the Son of Gcd is come, and I 2 hath 6o Grace defended. {chIp.il hath given us an Vnderjlanding^ that wejhould know him that is true : And we are in him that is true^ even in his Son Jefus Chriji, This is the true God and eternal Life. Perfons thus qualified in their Regene- ration, are already pofTefTed of the fame Kind of Life, which all the Saints (hall live in Heaven for ever. For Grace here and Glory hereafter differ only gradually., nor fpecifically., not in Kind but in Degrees ; and Grace in all its Degrees is called Glory. The Impoffibility of offering Salvation to finfulMen, without offer- ing the Grace of Regeneration to them, may be thus made further evident : God cannot be truly faid to offer Salvation to Sinners with- out offering to them whatfoever is neceffary on his Part, in order to their Salvation. God may offer Salvation to Sinners without offerino- to them what is neceffary on their Part, in order to their Salvation, fuch as is the Condition required of them in order to it : But an Offer of Salvation, without an Offer of what is abfolutely neceffary to it, on the Part of him, by whom the Offer is fuppofed to be made, feemeth utterly impoflible. There may be indeed the Shew of fuch an Offer, but really there can be none. Such a feemino- Offer cannot be fmcere. If a Phyfician in whofe Power alone it is to heal a fick Man, fhould tell him he would beftow a plentiful Eftate upon him, provided he would do fomething, which a Man in Health only can do, and not withal offer to reflore him to Health ; would any one fay, that that Phyfician was fincere and kind, in that feeming Offer ? Or would he not rather be guilty of mocking and tantalizing him therein. I do not charge the bleffed God with dealino- thus with fmful Men, but am fhewing that he does not. A better Account may be given of his Dealings with them than this is, as b^' the Help of God, I hope to make evident in the Sequel of this Difcourfe. CHAP* Chap. III. I Grac 6 defended. 61 CHAP. III. Concerning the Nature of that Faith and Repentance^ 8cc. to which the Promife of eternal Life is^ in this Difcourfe^ fuppofed to he made. y^^^c^^ T has been already faid, That the Condition on which F(jR«^^^^ Salvation is promifed to Sinners in the Gofpel, does ^P include or comprife in it Faith, Repentance, Obedience, ^^pw Seeking of God, and in a Word, every Thing, what- ^SSX^W^aGS ever it be, that is fo required of them, to whom the Gofpel is preached, that God will not fave them with- out it. But this is too general an Account of the Nature of the Condition of the new Covenant, or of the Condition required of Sin- ners, in order to their Salvation \ which is the Reafon of what is here propofed to Confideration. For whereas Faith, Repentance, Obedience, l^c. or by whatever other Names thefe Ac^s are called, are of two Sorts or Kinds, accor- ding to the different States Perfons are in, wz. either a State of Na- ture, I mean that Condition that all Mankind are in, while unrege- nerate, or not born of the Spirit : Or a regenerate and juftified Eftate, fuch as they are in, who are born of God and become new Creatures. Whereas, I fay, fuch Ads as in Scripture, go by the Names of Faith, Repentance, ^c, do fpecifically differ, according to the different State of the Perfons, by whom they are performed ; it muft needs be neceffary to enquire, which of thefe two Kinds of Ads they are, which are required of Sinners in order to their Salvation ; and to do this is the Bufmefs of this Chapter. Now, whereas I maintain in this Effay, That the Grace of Rege- neration is comprifed in the Salvation conditionally offered in the G^of- pel, it will evidently follow on this Suppofition, That the Faith and Repentance required in the Covenant of Grace, as the Condition on which Salvation is offered to us, cannot be of that Kind which is exer- cifed by none but regenerate and juflified Perfons ; for fo, Sinners ihould be in a State 9f Salvation before thev perform the Condition ... required 6i Grace defended. { chap.iil required of them, in order to their being fayed ; contrary to Reafon and to Scripture alfo ; for it is by Faith that we are juftified, Rom, 3. 28. and 5. I. And the Wrath of God abideth on Sinners till they believe, 'John 3. 36. I therefore conclud'e, That whatever it be, and bv what Names foever call'd, that is required of Sinners in order to their being faved, is what they m.uft perforBi before theyareiiiil State of Salvation, and {q while they are in an unregencrate and un- ju^ificd State .: Which is no more than to fay, before God faves them. And when awakened Sinners afk, whafthey {hall do to be faved ? as in A5i$ 2, 37. and 16. 30. this is plainly fuppofed in their Inquiry ; and they are confirmed in this by the Anfwer given to. tbejT), being fuitable to the Meaning of their Qiieftion. In order therefore to my fupporting the Hypothefis I have under* taken to defend, it will be necefiary that I do two Things, viz. (l) Prove it to be impofTible, that the Condition required of us ihould ponfijft in iiny Aci or Acts to be performed by us, being already born again, and by virtue of tjiat Grace which in our Regeneration we re- ceive. (2) That it is very poflible, that the Condition to this End required of fmful Men, ftiouid be performed by them, before they are born of the Spirit ; and that, by virtue of fuch Aids and Influences as God may afford them by his Word and Spirit, without bellowing the Grace of Regeneration on them ; and before they receive this Grace : And both thefe Things I (hall have Occafion to endeavour to confirm in the Profecution of the Work, in which I am now engaged. But my prefent Defign in this Chapter, is briefly to conndcr the Nature of thofe Acts, which, I fay, are comprifed in the Condition on v/hich God offers to fave Sinners ; and wherein they differ from thofe, which, tho' much better, are not, yea, cannot be, required to that End. Now here I will firji fhew, what the fundamental Ground and Reafonofthe Difference that is between , them, is; And then, y^- condly^ wherein the Difference does appear, fo far as i am able to difcern and difcover it. I. As to the Reafon and Ground of the Difference betwixt the A6I3 nov/ to be compared, the Difficulty feems not to be very gre?.t 3 it being evident, that the Realon thereof is this, that the A6ls of fuch as are in a regenerate and juftified EUate, do, or may, flow from an inward Principle of true Holinefs ; or from a Principle of fpiritual Life, which, in their new Birth, they have been endowed v/ithal^ cTZ.ni ] Grace defended, 63 withal, called in Scripture, as has been declared, the new Man, the fieiu Creature, a new Heart, a ?iew Spirit, tlie Seed of God, the divifie Nature, &c. This Principle, being a fpiritual and holy Thing, deno- minates the Perfons fpiritual and holy, who arc the Subjects of it ; and fuch as they are, their Actions are, or may be alfo, like the Prin- ciple from which they proceed. On the other Fland, fuch as are in a State of Nature, and fo dcftitute of any fuch heavenly and divine Principle, as has been now mentioned ; and fo not fpiritual, but car- nal, do not, cannot, perform any fuch fpiritual and holy Adlions, as fuch as are regenerate can do : For A6lIons cannot be better than the Principle which they proceed or fpring from. Wc are accordingly told, that that ivhicb is born of the Spirit is Spirit, and that which is born of the Flejh is FUJh, John 3. 6. And with this agrees that in Rom. 8. 8. They that are in the Flejh cannot pleafe God: And that alfo I Cor. 2. 14, 15. The natural Adan receiveth not the Things of the Spirit of God : For they are Fooliftmcfs unto hint', neither can- he kmw ihem, becaufe they are fpiritually difcerned. But he that is fpiritual judgeth all Things, Sic. Agreeably hereunto the State of Mankind, with Relation to their Adions good and bad, feems to be fully and plainly fet forth by our Saviour, Luke 6. 43, 44,. 45. For a good Tree bringeth not forth cor r rupt Fruit : Neither doth a corrupt Tree bring forth good Fruit. For every Tree is knoivn by his oivn Fruit : Fer of Thorns Men do not gather Figs, not cf a Brajnble-Bujh gather they Grapes, A good Adan, out of the good Treafure of his Heart, bringeth forth that which is good ; a?:d an evil Man, out of the evil Treafure of his Heart, bringeth forth that which is evil: For of the Abundance of the Fie art the Mouth fpeaketh.^^ 'SYo. may doubtlefs, from theScriptures that have been mentioned, cpnclude it to be a Truth, That, in a proper and (Iriifl Scnfe, no A6lions are holy and good, but what are performed by good or godly Perfons, fuch as ^XQ born of God, or born of the Spirit \ and which flow from an Inward Principle of fpiritual Life, or true Holinefs. Yet on the other Hand it may be truly affirmed, that feme A£tions which may be, and arc, performed by Perfons in an unrcgcnerate State, which have fomething of Goodnefe in them ; (tho' ofaninfc- riour Kind) and are (o far acceptable to God, by whom Acftions ar£ Weighed, I Sam. 2. 3. and who perfedlly knows what of Good or Evil there is in any of them, and values them accordingly, approving them fo far as they arc good, and abhorring them fo far loith ^s they are evil. But of this more hereafter : At prcfent my Bufmefs is to fhew, that there' is a real Difference betwixt tlic good Adlions of the Regenerate, 64 Grace defended, \ chap.iil Regenerate, and the beft that can be performed by unregenerate Per- fons ; and wherein that Difference lieth* Wherefore, I fhall here, fecondly^ mention three Things, wherein I think the good A6lions of the Regenerate greatly differ, and that fpecifically, from any that can be performed by unregenerate Perfon?. ■ "il^And/r/?, the Knowledge which the Regenerate have of God and fpiritual Things is exper'unental^ and their other A6lrons proceed- ing from fuch Knowledge, fuitable to it ; but not fo the Unrege- nerate. I will here confider, firji^ that Knoivledge which the Regenerate have of God and Things fpiritual ^ and then their other Adions pro- ceeding therefrom. 1. I fay, the Knowledge of the Regenerate Is experimental; which the Knowledge of the Unregenerate is not. Now to clear up this, we may obferve (i) That the Eled of God have not, in their Converfioji, any other obje£i:ive Revelation of God, than the Non- Ele£t, who are never favingly converted. The external Revelation of divine Obje£ls and Truths, which we have in the holy Scriptures, is a fulficient Ground for the Belief and afTured Knowledge of them ; fo that thofe who do not believe and know them, as they ought to do, cannot plead, that they have not fufficient Evidence of the Truth and Reality of them. If they could truly fo plead, this would be a good Reafon for their not believing them, which they evidently cannot have, (I fpeak of thofe who enjoy the Gofpel) as appears in Luke 16. 27, — -31. Nay, I fuppofe it cannot be proved, that when the Eledl be- lieve, with a Kind of Faith peculiar to them^ they have any other objeiftive Revelation of divine Truths, and Evidence to ground their Faith on, than thofe have who never fo believe. 2. Perfons enjoying fuch obje6live Revelation and Evidence of di- vine and fpiritual Things, need Nothing more of that Kind, in order to believing and knowing them in a gracious and holy Manner, than is afforded to thofe who never fo believe. What is further neceffary in order thereunto, is done for them in Regeneration or paffive Con- verfion ; (of which before) and in the Afliftance they have in exer- cifing the Grace they have fo received ; unto all which no new ob- jediive Revelation is required. This, I fay, is done by God's giving unto Men an Heart to know h'un, Jer. 24. 7. and by his opening their Eyesy to behold wondrcus Things out of his Lawy Pfal. 119. 18. And this CHAP.m. } G^<^(:^ defended. 65 this God does by working a fubje£live Change ; that is, he rcdifics the Organ, and reftores the depraved Faculty. He does it not by- fending new Light, in other objc6live Revelations, which the Subje6ts of fuch a Change had not before : For it is plainly fuppofed in the Places but now quoted, that Perfons, for whom this is done, have, before the doing it for them, a fufficient objective Revelation of the Things which they are required to believe and know. 3. The Knowledge of fpiritual Things, in this Way obtained, is experimental ., and fuch as none but the Regenerate have or can have. All the Knowledge which the Unregenerate havT, or can have, of divine and fpiritual Things, called the ^^^p Things of God.^ 2 Cor. 2. 10, is quite of another Kind, vi%. only by a natural AfTent on Tefti- mony unto the Truth of the Things believed. And their Afllirance of fuch Things, in this Way, can arife no higher than their Know- ledge of him that teftifies will lay a Foundation for, and the Reafons which they do, or may fee of the Credibility of the Things teftified, will be fufficient to produce ; which fometimes may be a confiderable Meafure of Certainty : Yet this is valtly different from, and no Ways comparable to, that experimental Knov/ledge which the Regenerate do attain. The Difference betwixt the two Kinds of Knov^'lcdge I am fpeak- ing of, is, I fay, very great and plain, as the Difference is great be- twixt what we know by Report only, and what we know experi- mentally, by Seeing, Feeling, Tafting, i^c. See i John i . i . A fick Perfon, whofe Appetite is vitiated, and who has loft his Relifli of Meat and Drink ; tho' he can believe fuch as commend this and the other Sort of either, becaufe he reckons them credible 3 yet cannot have the fame AfTurance of the Goodnefs of the Things he has often heard praifed, as he has, who being in Health can, and does, expe- rience the Sweetnefs of the Things he feeds on, and by which he is ftrengthned and nourifhed, and fo certainly knov.'s the Benefit of. Thus Sin is a Difeafe, which has deprived Mankind of theirAppetite and Relifh of fpiritual Things ; therefore the carnal Mind is Ermiily again/} God, Rom. 8. 7. with which we may compare, i Cor. 2. 14. but lately mentioned. But in Regeneration, this woful Diftemper of Men's Souls is, in a good Meafure, cured ; {o that they find and experience the Certainty and Excellency of fpiritual Objcdls ; and can converfe with them with Pleafure and Delight, as the Scripture? plentifully fhew. Such as pleafe may read and compare, Jcl^ 42. 5, (?. PfaL 34. 8. I Pet. 2. 2, 3. Pfal. 119. 97, Cant. 2. i. i Joh, 1.3. K Fro:n 66^ Grace defended. } chIp.iil From this, experimental Knowledge called Wifdom^ ^^^ fpiritual VndirJ^anding^ Col. 1.9. there always proceed fuch Adions as are fuitable thereunto, and as become thofe that are fpiritually wife, fuch as are the genuine Fruits and proper Effects of the Knowledge of the Holy^ mention'd Prci;. i. 7. Pfal. ill, 10. Job 2%. 28. dXio Prov, 2. IO5 II, 12. 2. Another Thing wherein, I think, the good Actions of the Regenerate differ from the befl: that can be performed by any unre- generate Perfons, is this, that they are performed out of fuch a Love to God, as has his infinite Perfections for the formal Reafon and Ground of it. Here I fhall obferve, (i) That unregenerate Perfons may perform Adions that are materially good, tho' they have no Love to God at all ; yea, tho' they have no Regard to him. It is not to be doubted, but that unregenerate Sinners may believe there is a God ; and have a Fear and Dread of him, as well as Devils, Jam. 2. 19. And out of fuch a Fear of him they may yield Obe- dience to his Commands, tho' they love him not. (2) Unregenerate Perfons may have fome Kind of Love to God, which may put them on doing many Things which he requires them to do. There be fome unregenerate Perfons that have a very confiderable Refpedl and Veneration for the great God that made them, and continually pre- ferves them. They therefore love not to hear his Name blafphemed ; and the Kindnefs they may apprehend they have received from him, . qiay influence them to do many Things, which they may think good in themfelves, and pleafmg in his Sight ; and they may apprehend that God is (o gracious as to reward them well for the good Works which they perform. There may be in the Unregenerate, a Kind of natural Love to God, anfwerable to the Apprehenfions they have of fome Goodnefs in him, as well as fuch a Love to their Neighbours ; even common Grace may go thus far. (3) But no unregenerate Perfon ever loved and obeyed God, on the Account of the admirable Perfections of his Nature ; fo that his Perfuafion of his infinite Good- nefs, arifing from his own experimental Acquaintance with him, was the formal Reafon of this his Love to him, and Defire to do that which would pleafe him ; fo that they would do the fame, tho' they them- felves had no Benefit by it. I fuppofe. That he that cannot do thus, is ftill in a State of Nature, and does not know and love God in a gra- cious Manner : And has not, in the Senfe of the Scripture, tajied that the Lord is gracious, i Pet. 2, 3. Pfal, 34. 8. 3- I ch7p.iv.' } Grace defended. 6j 3. I think the Regenerate only can perform good AcSlions, with an Aim and Defign to glorify God, as the ultimate^'End of them. There is, as I think, no Doubt to be made, but that t]:e Unregenerate may, and fometimes do, aim at God'sGlory, in fome of thcirAcbion?. Such may be perfuadcd, That to glorify God here, is the only Way to obtain eternal Life hereafter j and this may put them upon endeavour- ing to glorify God's Name. But none but a gracious Soul can aim at God's Glory, as the ultimate End of what he does ; and tho' he fhould fee no Advantage to himfelf by it. But I think every truly holy Soul would do this. However, God does not require us to aim at his Glory, without any Eye or View to our own Advantage : Thefc are Things, by God himfelf, fo joined together, that we ought not to go about to feperate them. So much may fuffice to have faid in this Place, concerning the Difference of the gracious and holy Actions of thofe who are already pafled from Death to Life, and thofe Actions in which, I fuppofe, the Condition, on which Salvation is offered unto Sinners, does confif]-. This will neceflarily be furthsr fpoken to hereafter. CHAP. IV. That GOD, in offeri?ig JesusChrist, with all his Benefits^ tojinful Men^ ^mifi needs offer them the Grace of Regeneration. l^^^-'f'aof'G^'t'a^^'^ Jefus Chrift, with all his Benefits, made to Sinners, if^/ the PoUutiom of the Worlds thro' the Kjiowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jefus Chrij}^ are yet mentioned as finally mifcarrying. Now I am not here difcourfing with fuch as hold, that true Saints may fall from Grace. In the Words there- fore under Confideration, it is plainly intimated, that God will not ordinarily, at leaft, make Perfons Partakers of the divine Nature 'till they have nril reformed their Lives, in fuch a Manner and Degree ss Perfons may before they are born again. And this is plainly inti- mated to us m other l^exts of Scripture, as in Prov. i. 22, 23. and I Cor, 6. 9. as I (hall afterwards more fully fhew. Men have no Reafon to expect, that God will pour out his Spirit upon them, to. their faving Converfion, that will not repent and reform their Lives, in fuch a Manner as by the Help of common Grace they may. This, I fay, is nece/Tary in order to Men's being 7nade Partakers of the ]di' 'Vine Nature. Now I know of but two Ways in which it can, with any Shew of Truth, be fuppofed, that the precious Promifes mentioned can ferve unto this End. One of thefe, is, that they are Inflruments in the Hand of God for the working this great Change, call'd Regenera- tion ; and {^ of cotnmunicating unto Sinners the divine Nature fpoken of. The other Senfe is, that God makes Sinners Partakers of this gracious Principle, in Purfuance of precious Promifes, wherein he has conditionally engaged fo to do. The former of thefe Ways fome take and I miflike. The latter of them is that to which I adhere, and for which I plead. I fuppofe, that thofe who are for the firfl, may think there is Danger in admitting, that the divine Nature is given in Confequence of any conditional Promifes made of it. I think there is none. I will firft briefly fhew why I agree not with thofe who expound thefe Words in the firjl of thefe Ways , and then fhew why I am for the latter. And in the Z";^ Place, I will give fome Reafons why I think thefe Promifes are not here confidered as the Means or Inflruments by which the Grace of Regeneration is wrought in Men's Souls. And (i) I fuppofe, that if the Defign of the Holy Ghod h.id here been to declare what the inftrumental Caufes of Mail's Convv-rfion are, he would not have mentioned the Promifes of God only, but would have afcribed this to the Word of God in general, as he does in other Places, where it appears that this is his Defign, as in Pfal. 19. 7, S, J^?;/?. JO. 143— -17. and y^/7?. i. 18. The Spirit of God in men,-- tionin^ JrAP.vm. } Grace defended. 93 tioning Promifes only, gives us great Reafon to think, tliat wlnt ha afcribcs to them, is romething proper to them, and not to the whole Word of God, which is inftrumental in Aden's Converfion, but ta the Promifes only, as giving a Right to the (jood fpoken of in the Place und^ Confideration. (2) There is nothing either in the Text or Context, to oblige us to think, that that which I now argue againft, muil: neceflarily be intended in the Place ; but on the contrary, that which I plead for fcems to be the mofl natural and obvious Scnfe of the Words, as 1 (hall prefently fhew, (3) That the Inllrumcntality of the Promifes unto iXIen's Converfion, or to their being 7ncuU Far- takers of the divine Nature, is not intended in the Words, I make evi- dent by this Reafon : The Promifes neither are, nor can be, inftru- mental in the Senfe here in Queftion, in making any Perfons Par^ takers cf the divine Nature. The Words muft not be undciftood in a Scnfe in which thev neither arc nor can be true. laKCr But now. That no Man can by the Promifes. be made a Pan cf the divine Nature, in the Senfe 1 oppofe, I thus make manifeft. Men's h'Smg made Partakers cf the divine Nature, is the fame Thing which, by Calvinifs, is otherwife called pajfve Converfion \ or Conver- fion taken in that Senfe as Divines underlrand it, when they lay tlic Soul is pajjive in it ; and affirm it to be wro't by an immediate Acl of tlie holy Ghoft creating us anezv in Chriji Jefus to gocd IP'orks, as in Pfal. 50. 10. Eph. 2. 10. and Chap. i. 19, 20. In Converfion thus taken, the Sinner does nothing, but God all, Jer. ^r. 18, ig. Turn thou ?ne, and I fall be turned . After I was turned, I repented. In the Converfion of a Sinner, taken in this Scnfe, there is a Principle of Grace, or a divine Nature, put into the Soul, in the doing of which the Sinner himfelf has no Hand. He has a nevj Heart given to him, and a neiv Spirit put within him, by God. He does not this for iiimfelf, Ezek. 36. 26. nor is it poffible that any Promifes can be the Inftru- ments of working fuch a Change in Men's Souk. I'hc Change now under Confideration is not wro't by a moral Injlrwrunt, but by 2iphy- fical Caufe, or a fupernaiural Power ; not by tJioral Suafion, but by the mighty Power cfGcd. When Mankind firfc fmncd againft God, they loft all the Power they had to perform any Actions truly hob,' : Now when Sinners are made Partakers cf the divine Nature, this Power is reftored again in and unto tiicm ; which the V/ord read and preached is no Way competent to be an Inffrument of j neither the Precepts, Promifes, nor Threatnings of it can "cIo this \ nor can all of them to- gether work fuch a Change, any more than an Argument or S)lIogifin .cin remove a Mountain, AH that tiie Word can do,, it cLoes in 3 94 Grace defended^ \ chap.viii: moral Way, by Inftru6lions, Convictions, and Perfuafions. It does not give any Power to the Soul that it had not before, but excites and ftirs Perfons up to make a good Improvement of the Powers they have. 'Tho' that Text, Jam. i. i8. Of his own TVill begat he us by the JFord of Truth ^ feems to look another Way ; yet we muft know, that Regeneration, or the new Birth, may be taken more largely, as it comprifeth Men's active Converiion in it, or as intending their paflive Converfion only. In the former Senfe, Converfion is afcribcd to the Word of God read and preached ; but in the latter Senfe it is not, neither indeed can be. The Miniftry of the Word does ordi- narily accompany Converfion, but never works the Change : It does much in the Work preparatory to it, and in exciting to the Adts and Exercife of Grace, when once given ; but it does notliing towards the infufing of the Principle. The preaching of the Word is not that by which we are created anew unto good Works : It is another Kind of Word that does this, even fuch a Kind of Power as that. Gen. i. 3. God f aid ^ Let there he Light y and there luas Lights as appears by comparhig that Place with 2 Cor. 4. 6. God who hath commanded the Light to Jlmie out of Darknefs^ hath finned into our Hearts^ to give us the Light of the Knowledge of the Glory of God y in the Face of Jefus Chrijf. This God docs by giving the divine Nature to us, as in the Text under \ Confideration. Thus I have fhewn why I think the divine Nature is not communicated by the Promifes, as inftrumental efficient Caufes ofit. I fhall nov/ proceed to (hew pofitively, why I conceive, that by thefe Promifes wc are made Partakers of the divine Nature , as it is pur- fuant to them, th.-it God cprrununicates the fame unto us ; or as it is hy them we have a Right to it : And to confirm this, I fay, (i) This feems to be the mofl natural and genuine Senfe of the Expreflions ufed in the Text here infiftcd on. When Perfons arc faid to be made P^r/^i«rjof any Mercy, by Promife, who would once imagine, that this meant, that the Promife intended was the efficient Caufe in the Communication^ or Conveyance of the Good faid to be given by it ? And not rather, that it was by Promife as that gave a Right to it. See Gal. 3. 18. If the Inheritance be of the Latu^ it is 7Jo more of Pro- mife \ but God gave it to Abraham by Promife. (2) Another Reafon of this is, becaufe it is certain, that there are a great many fucb ex- ceeding great and precious Pro?nifes 2iv en, (or the End here intended, viz. That, by Virtue of them, the Perfons to whom they are given, mi^ht be Partakers of the divine Nature 3 the fame being conditionally offered ?HVp.vm: } Grace defended, 95 offered in them. If no fuch conditional Promlfes could be found in Scripture, as thefe I fpeak of, it would not then be cafy to declare what Promifes arc intended in the Place under Confidcration, fuppo- fino- their Inftrumcntality to Converfion were what is therein defigned. But if there arc many conditional Promifes of Regeneration found in Scripture, then we have good Reafon to fuppofe, that the Way in which Sinners are by thefe made Partakers of the divine Nature, is by entitling them to it, on their Fulfilment of the Condition on which it is offered. Now, That there are many fuch Promifes, I will fhcv/ in the Sequel of this Difcourfc, by inftancing in divers of them ; and fo (hall here fuppofe this to be a Trufli. But I fuppofe it will by fomebe here faid. That tho' it be denied, that there are any fuch conditional Promifes as I plead for ; yet inaf- much as there are abfolute Promifes of the Grace of Regeneration, (by fome called the firft Grace) thefe may be the Promifes intended in the Text infifted on j and in Confequence of which the Grace of a nev/ Heart may be given, without Men's Performance of any Condition, by which they may be entitled to the Good of thefe Promifes : And Ezek* II. 19, 20. and Chap. 36. 26. are commonly inftanced in, as containing fuch Promifes. Unto this, feveral Things may be faid, as, Flrf}, It may be doubted whether thefe called abfolute Promifes^ are indeed any Promifes at all. Some learned Men fecm to think they are not ; but rather Prophecies of the Mercies mentioned in them. I think Mr. Baxter was of this Opinion. It feems eflential to a Promife of good Things, that the Perfon or Perfons, to whom it is made, be fome Way or other defcribed or indigitated in it. Now, thefe, here called Promifes, do not this. No one Perfon can truly affirm, that thefe Promifes are made to him. If they be Promifesyz^^^^^ might have laid as good a Claim to them as Peter. If God converts a Sinner, he does not therein fulfil any fuch Promife to him : If he does, then was he obliged by Promife to do it 5 which, how can any make manifeft. If God fhould not convert and fave any Sinner in the World, none could fay, that God has not kept his Word with him : Unlefs, with me, conditional Promifes of converting Grace be ac- knowledged. If there be any Thing at all of the Nature of a Pro- mife, in fuch Declarations of God's Intention to convert and fave fome of the Ciiildren of Men, all Mankind have an equal Right to it, by Virtue of what is therein engaged, tho' God may, in his fecret Pur- pofe, intend the Good prgmifed to certain definitive Perfons, and not to any other, Secondly^ 96 Grace defended. \ Chap. VIIL • Secondly^ If thcfe are allowed to be properly Promires ; yet feme think they are not Promifes properly made to any of the finful Chil- dren of Men, but to Jefus Chrift himfelf, in the Covenant of Re- demption, agreed on betwixt his Father and him ; of which we have an Account in the holy Scriptures, Pfal^ 39. 3. Ifal. 53. 10, 11, 12. and clfewhere. Of this Judgment was our very judicious and learned Mr. Willard, as appears in liis Treatife of that Cove- nant, Page 118. Thus thefe Promifes are not made to Sinners at all, no\' gk'Pi to u$^ as in the Text under Confideration, Thirdly^ If thefe be allowed to be Promifes, and to be made to the finful Children of Men, I defire to know how it appears, that there is no Condition required of them in order to their being Partakers of the Good promifed. The Contrary feems plainly to appear, With Refpccl to that in E-zck. 36. 26. For tho' a Condition be not §x- preiled in the fame Verfe or Sentence ; yet there feems to be one plai-nly required, a little after, in Verfe 37. Tct for this will I he en- quired cf by ihe Houfe of\{xd,t\ io do it for them. By which Words, I think, all other Promifes of the like Nature may be explained. God does, therein, as good as tell thofe, unto v/hom fuch Promifes are made, that they may not cxpedl this Mercy without feeking to him for it ; and doubtlefs thofe that expect it in any other Way will find thcmfelves miftaken. What tho' God does not always exprefs the Condition of a Promife, in every Place where the Promife it felf, and the Good promifed, is cxprefied ; yet if, in other Places, the Condition be exprelTed, as well as the Good he promifeth, this is fufficient to let us know, that the Promife is every where to be under- stood as made on that Condition ; at leaft, that Men may not expedl the Good of fuch Promifes, without the Performance of the Condition required in order to it. And I fliall ftill have Occafion to fhew, that there are many Places of Scripture where Promifes of the fame Mercy are conditionally propofed to Sinners. And fuppofc I fhould find, in the Bible, fcveral Places where Pardon of Sin is promifed, without exprefly naming the ConditicH on w]]lch that Promife is made, might I from thence infer, that it is a Benefit that is not conditionally offered t If this would do, we may find fuch Places, as .in Ifai, 43. 22. fer, 31. 34. and Chap. 33. 8. fo in Micah 7. 18. May we infer from hence, that Pardon of Sin is not conditionally offered ? Surely I think not. CHAP. Chap ix'. } Gva^c defended. 97 C H A p. I X. That the conditional Promifes^ made in Scrips ture^ that fuch asfeek God and his fpecial Favour^ Jhalljind hi?n^ do contain or imply in them^ an Offer of the Grace of Rege- neration, HIIII^IS Shall, for the clearing up of what Is here affert- ^Sl§li?i# ed, endeavour to fhew, (i) That there are In Scrip- §%^ I &■§% ^''^^^ conditional Promifes made, that fuch as fcek 2flS^¥J'^2S G^^/andhisy^^aW Favour, fhall find him and that, lISlllSlS (^).X^"' '^'^'" ^tox^^its contain and imply in them, ^^^^^'c^^(^^^^w an Offer of the Grace of Regeneration. To make good the firft of thefe, I (liall (i) inftance in feveral fuch Promifes as I here intend. (2) Make fomc Obfervations on them. I. The Promifes I here intend are fuch as thefe which follow, I Chron. 28. c^.— If thou feek him, he will be found of thee. 2 Chron. 15. 2. - — The Lord h with you while ye he ivlih him; If ye feek him, he will be found of you -, Ifye forfake him, he will for fake you. Prov. 8. 17. Thofe that fcek ?ne early Jlmll find 7m. Jer. 29. 13. Ta Jhallfeek me, ardfind?7ie, whenyejhall fear ch for me with all your Heatt. Amos 5. 4. rhm faith the Lord unto the Houfe of Ihsid, Seek ye me andyejhall live. Matth. 7. 7,-11. Afk,andlt jhall be given to yow. Seek, and ye Jhall find : Knock, and It fi)all be opened unto you. For every one that afk^eth, recelveth : And he that feeketh, findeth : And to hhn that kmcketh. It fi)all he ope7ied. Or what Man Is there of you, ivhom^ If his Son afii Bread, will give him a Stone ? Or If he ask a Flfij, zvill give him a Serpent ? Ifye then, being evil, knovj how to give good Gifts to your Children, how much more lulll your Father which Is in Heaven, give good Things to them that ask hbn. We have the fame Words, \n cffea, Liiks II. 9j— JJ- With thefe Texts agree th Ifai. 45. iq. O I fciid 98, Grace defended \ Part- II; Chap. IX: I faidmt unto the Hcufe ofl^zoh^ Seek ye me in vain, Alfo Ifai. 55. t^ S-eek ye the Lord while he may be found— , ■^ 2. I mall make fome Obfervations on the Promifes. And here. Ifay, (i) Tho' the Words, in fome of the Places mentioned, are not cxprefs'd In the Form of Promifes ; yet Promifes are plainly fuppofed or implie-d in. them ; as In that Ifai. 45* 19. and "55. 6, - " -. y'""- ~ ■{^) The fe Promifes are ^^;?^///(j;?^/. A Condition is plainly expreft i\i moft of them, and implied in them, all : And the Condition reqiiired hyfcckirig God : And is otherwife called, ofking^ knocking^ Sec. ■ ; '.(3) Such conditional Promifes are made to unregenerate Perfons, to encourage tliem to feek the Lord for his fpecial Mercies or fpirjtual BleiSngs." I do not fay, they are not made to the Regenerate alfo, to encourage them to feek for more Grace ; but I think the firft and principal Defign of them, is, to encourage fuch as are in a State of Sin and Death, to feck to God for his faying Mercies ; fach as Pardon <)f Sin, a new Heart, and a nev/ Spirit. This is, at leaft, one Delign of them. - (4) Thofe Promifes quoted out of the old Teftament, as well as thofe out of the New, are Promifes of fpiritual Bleffings or everlafting Mercies, and ought not to be underftood of temporal BleiTings only, fee Pfal. 103. 17, 18. is) ■ Wl^c" unregenerate Perfons are called upon and encouraged to ieek God, with a Promife that they fhall find him, and obtain Mercy from him, the feeking intended does not comprife the exercifmg ot true Grace and Holinefs in it : It is impoflible it fhould do this : Be- ciufe this is that, which they being without, afe encouraged, to feek after. ' God does not fay unto an unregenerate Soul, " Seek to me *' for the Grace of Regeneration, in the Exercife of that fame Grace, *'^ and then I will beftow it upon thee." It is a Difhonour to God fo to expound fuch Promifes. Therefore tho* it be true, as in the laft foregoing Particular, that it is not any Kind of feeking that will .'m- fwer this End, but a feeking after a due and fuitable Manner, i. e.., feeking with Faith, in Hope, under an humble Senfe of UnworthineH-, ivith great Earneftnefs and Perfeverance, &c. yet this Grace to ba cxercifed in feeking the Grace of a new Heart and a new Spirit, can- hot be fuch Faith, Hope and Humility, is'c. as is peculiar to fuch as are ah'eady born of God, and become new Creatures j but fuch as Hiay be called ccmmon Grace ; inafmuch as fuch may have it, as are tioi ^ct pafjed fro?)! Death to Life ; or as have not eternal Life ^bidi>ig tntkefn^^'i.'wijdm 5. 24. compared with i John z^. \/^^[i^, -Thh S,^;:?:}} Grace JefefKk^. ^9^ feems to be fo evident, that I wonder that all ]\tcn do not yield to \\.\ as I know of fome that do. Having now confidered the Nature of the Promifcs alledgcd in this Chapter, for the Confirmation of my Hypothefis, I fhall proceed to {hew, Secondly^ That an Offer of the Grace of Regeneration is im-? plied in them. I have proved that they contain and comprifj condi- tional Promifes of our finding God, and obtaining his fpecial Favour ^ and I muft confcfs I am extremely miftaken, if this d6es not include 'and imply in it our obtaining the regenerating and faving Influence^ of his holy Spirit. ]])oes not our obtaining Mercy at God*s Hands, as well imply in it his changing our Hearts, and endowing us with hl$ holy Spirit, or making us Partakers of the divine Nature, as l^iis par- doning our Sins, and juftifying of us ? Finding God, furely fignifies'^ ■finding Favour in his Sight j and this certainly implies in it, our re-J 'ceiving from him all thofe fpiritual Blcffings which he beftows on all thofe to whom he extends his fpecial Favour. CHAP. X. That thofe conditional Promifes of the Holy Spirit^ which we have in the Oracles of God^ include and imply in them Offers of co?iverti?tg Grace. HE PVomiies wlilch I here intend are fuch as thcfe following. Prov. I. 23. Turn you at ?ny Re^ proof : Behold^ I will pour out my Spirit uni9 youi I will make known my IVords unto you. Luke 11.13^ Ifye^ being evil, know how to give good Gifts unto yoiif Children, how much more fhall your heavenly Father -^•^ give his Holy Spirit to them that ask him, A(^s 2: .38. Repent, and be baptized every one of you, in the Name ofyefus Chriji^ for the Remijfion of Sinsy and ye Jhall receive the Gift of the Holy Ghoji^ ' That thefe are Promifes, and that they are conditional, feems too Lcvident to .be denied. A Precejit with, a Promife aline-xed to en- .. , O 2 courajrc lOo Grace defended. { chap. x. courage the Performance of the Duty required, muft, I think, be looked upon as a conditional Promife. Such are thefe in each of the Places mentioned, as by the bare reading of them appears. That thefe Promifes are made to unregenerate Perfons cannot, I think, be reafonably denied. That in Prov, i. 23. is made to fuch Perfons as are defcribed in Verfe 22, who are there thus called on, How long^ yefimple Ones^ will ye love Simplicity f And the S corners de- light in /corning. And it follows in Verfe 23. Turn ye^ biz. In Luke II. 13. the Perfons fpoken to are dire£led how they may obtain the Gift of God's Spirit, which fuppofeth that they are, or may be, without it ; and thofe who are fo, may, I think, well take the Words as fpoken to tliem, or concerning them. The Words in J^s 2. 38. were fpoken to very heinous Sinners, who were then clofely dealt with, for having a Hand in the crucifying the Lord Je- lus, and who htmgpricked in the Hearty under a deep Senfe of their Sin and Guilt, alkcd that Qiieftion in Verfe 37. What Jhall we do ? And the Anfwcr given them did not import that they were in a State of Grace, but the contrary. They were, many of tliem at leaft, in an unconverted State. Thefe Things being briefly obferved, I fhall more diftin£lly con- fid er two Things, viz. (i) What the Benefit is, here conditionally promifcd to thefe. (2) On what Condition it is promifed, I . Let us confider what the Benefit is which, in the Places under Confideration, is conditionally promifed to fuch Sinners as thefe : And, that we may judge arightpf this, we fhall confider how the fi\me is defcribed in each of the mentioned Places. I (hall begin with that in Prov. i. 23. And here the Good pro- mifed is thus defcribed ; I will pour out fny Spirit unto you. Whether by God's Spirit here, we are to underltand the Perfon of the Holy Ghoft, or thofc Gifts and Graces of which he is the Author and Be- ftower, need not be earneltly difputed. If the former, then the Spirit is here fpoken of as poured on Men to work his fliving Graces in them, which is as much as 1 defire. If the fecoady that is what I plead for in this ElTay. If both, this ftill comes fully up to my Purpofe, 7;/z. .That the Grace of Regeneration is conditionally offered or pro- mifed to Sinners in the Covenant of Grace. In which of thefe Ways foever this Promife is underflood, faving Illumination and Inftru<5lion is certainly intended in the Promife made. Part II Chap x; } Grace defended. loi made, when God tells thofe that he fpcaks to, that he will make known his Words to them. This will be evident by comparing thefc Words with others like them : Such as we may find in Prov. 2. 5. and PfaL 119. 18, 19. John 17. 6, 7, 8. Tlic pouring out of God's Spirit to fmful Men, certainly intends faving Illumination and Converfion. In that Place, Luke 11. 13. the Thing promifed, is the Gift of the Holy Spirit to thofe that perform the Condition to that End required of them. Now by this Holy Spirit we muft underftand, either the Perfon of the Holy Ghoft, whom God fends into the Hearts of his chofen Ones, to regenerate, fandify and influence them, and dwell in them, as his Temple for ever, of which the Scriptures fpeak plen- tifully ; or that Principle of faving Grace and HoUnefs, which he works in, or beftows upon, fmful Men in their Regeneration ; which is alfo called by the Name of the Spirit of God, Gal. 5. 17. and Ezek. 36. 26. and elfewhere : Either of thefe will ferve my Turn. In J^s 2. 38. the Good conditionally promifed to the Sinners there fpoken to, is the Remijion of Sin, and the Gift of the Holy Ghoji \ In the laft of which the Grace of Regeneration is certainly implied, as well as in the other Promifes which I have already fpoken to. Thefe are Things which God has, in the Promife, joined toge- ther ; and no Man ought to go about to feparate them. What is intended by Salvation, Mark 16. 16. and in this Chap. Verfe 22. is here called Remijfion of Sin, is the fame with that Believing, which is required in the but now mentioned Text in Mark. As for that extraordinary EfFufion of the Holy Ghoft, fpoken of in the former Part of this Chapter, there are many who repent and arc baptized, who yet never obtain it. But the Spirit in its faving Operations, all who repent, and obtain Remiflion of Sins do receive. And thefc Benefits true Penitents are made Partakers of in the order in udiich they are here mentioned, as I have already abundantly proved ; fir/l Pardon of Sin, and then the Grace of Regeneration immediately thereon. 2. We muft confider what the Condition is on which this Bsncf fit is, or rather thefe Benefits are offered. And, (i) In Prov. I. 23. the Duty or Condition required is Turning at God's Reproof, by which we may not undeiftand fuch a Turning from Sin unto God as does pre-fuppofe the Gift of the Holy Spirit, in his regenerating io|, [Grace defended. \ Part IL Chap. X. regenerating Infiucnces ; for the Gift of the Holy Spirit, underftood inthisSenfe, evidently fblloweth the Turning here intended, as ap- pears in the Text \ fo that the Turning here required, is an hdi on which the mentioned Benefit is promifed. We mud know, therefore, that there \% a Turning .at GodU Re^ prcof, which is preparatory to Regeneration, and, in Order of Na- ture, before God's pouring out his Spirit unto us^ and making known his Words unto us^ in that fpecial Senfe, in which thefe Words are here ufed ; and unto which the Influences of the Holy Spirit, with v/hich fome Sinners are favoured before they are favingly converted, are fufficient. It is evident in Scripture, that Sinners enjoying the Miniftry of God's Word, (here, as I think, called his Reproofs) accompanied with the Strivings of his Spirit, may have a Work of Converfion wrought in them, of a lower Kind than that which we call by the Name of Regeneration ; and yet fuch as to denominate them Believers, Penitents, Saints and Righteous; infomuch that fome who were never regenerated by the Spirit of God, are in Scripture faid to have efcaped the Pollutions of the World ^ thro' the Knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jefus Chrift. If what I have here faid be called in Queftion, as I think it will not, I hope I fhall be able, if I live, to make it good : At prefent I fhall content my felf to refer my Rea- der to fome of the Texts by which this Truth is fuificiently confirm- ed : Such as Maith. 13. 20, 21. Luke^,!-}^, Maith. 12. 41. and Chap. n. 21. E%ek. 18. 24,26. ^Pet. 2. 20, 2i. I may add, that Sinners not yet favingly converted may be fo far turned as to cry earneflly to God for converting Grace, as in Jer, 31. 18. and Trov, 2. 3, 4. Thus much being faid, it is eafy to conceive how Pcrfons not )'ft\. endowed with the Holy Spirit, in the Senfe that the Regenerate are, may yet be fuch as afk him, or pray to God to beltow him on them, as in Luke ir. 13. TheCondition there required in order to Perfon's having God's Spirit poured out to them. In the other Text mentioned, ASis 2. 38. the Condition required, is, repenting and being baptized in the Name of Jefus Chrifi. By the former of thefe we muft underfland fuch a Kind of Repentance as I have already defcribed in the laft Paragraph, viz. a Kind of Repen- tance going before, and being, in the Nature of it, preparatory to Regeneration ; becaufe, according to the Text, Men's having Re- miffion of Sin and the Gift of the Holy Ghoft, follows after it. -In- deed when Sinners, being pricked in their Hearts, cry out, PP^hett Jhali chaT.x! J' Grace defended. 163- Jhallwedo, as in Verfe 37. and,' TFhat /hall I do to he favcd^ ?.s in Acls 16. 30. their Enquiry is not only after Pardon, but after a new- Heart and a new Spirit alfo. Sucli are therefore fitly here told how they may obtain the Gift of the Holy Ghoft, as well as the Pardon of their Sins. Note, that by Repentance, here, the fame Thing is in- tended as is meant by Believing, Mark 16. 16. •. What is implied in Men's being baptized in the Name cf Jefus Ghrijl ; and how this is required as a Condition of their receiving the Gift of the Holy Ghoft:, muft be here briefly conlidered ; for it fcems plainly to be {o required in the Words under Confideration. I then conceive that Baptifm here, is not to be confidcred as a mere Wafhing with Water, in the Name of Jcfus Chriil, nor indeed ever (hould be fo, but as a Seal and Token of the new Covenant, as Circumcifion, according to the Nature of the Inftitution, al^p wSsp.GetJt tji 1I4 Rom. 4. II. So that to be circumcifed of old was, and to be baptized now is, the fame Thing in otiier Words, as to be taken vifibly into Covenant with Gdd. Refpciling Circum- cifion it is plain that he that was circumcifed was thereby iDOund and obliged to fhe Obfervance of "the whole Law, GW. 5. 3* Wherei by the Law, I do not underftand the Covenant of Works, but the Covenant of Grace, according to that Difpeniation of it which, un- der the old Teftament, was to be obferved ; for according to that Law the Jiws were governed, and not according to the Tenor of the Covenant of Works ; if they had,, they could not have been faved. It is alfo evident, that he that is baptized In, or into, the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghoft, is thereby bro't under an Obligation to perform all the Duties required in the Gcfpel, or under the new Teftament. And, by the Way, Infants are as capable of being brought under fuch covenant Obligations now under the Gofpel, as thev were under the Law. And as for the Adult, when they are baptized, they are bound by their own AcSl and Deed, to perform all the Duties required in the nev/ Teftament. And hence it feemeth to follow, that to be baptized in the Name of Jefus Chrift, or in the Name of all the Pcrfons in the Floly Trinity, is the fame Thing as to be initiated into the new covenant State, and had under a foederar Obligation to perform all the Duties of It. Now this being dur^f-conrii-lered, we may the more eafily under- fland why, and in what Senfe Baptifm is required, as a Cundition of the new Covenant, or our Wiili!ign(^fs to take upon us an Obligation t-0 the Dutl|s of it, or- to- take thr Yoke of Jcfus Chrift upon as : ; -.V And 104 Grace defended. \ chap.xl And he that refufeth to be baptized, does in EfFedl therein fay, That he will not have the Man^ Jefus Chrift, to reign over him^ as in Luke ig. 14. Such therefore, as refufe to be baptized, are faid to refift the Counfel of God ogainft ihcmfehes^ Luke 7. 30. 'Tis therefore no Wonder, that this is required as ordinarily neceflary to Salvation, as in Mark 16. 16. and as neceflary to our obtaining Remiflion of Sin, and the Gift of the holy Ghoft, here in A^s z. 38. Here, by the Way, I cannot forbear obferving, how greatly ^they are miftaken, who think that Baptifm is, according to Chrifl's Infti- tution, to follow after Regeneration and the Remiflion of Sins, when in truth it is to be received or fubmitted to, in order to our obtaining thefe Mercies, as in the Text I am confidering. Tho' the fame Kind of Faith and Repentance be necefl^ary in order to it, as I have Ihev/ed ; yet not that which is peculiar to the Regenerate. C H A P. X L That the Offers made to Sinners^ of the Wa- ter of Life^ in the Gofpel^ are Offers of the Javing Graces of the holy Spirit. ^^^^f%^^ HAT there are in the holy Scriptures moft graci- ^€*€**^€>C^^ ous Offers of the Water of Life, is very certain, ^^-^t^^^^ Such an Offer is that in Ifai. 55. i. Ho! everyone ^f '* t*t^^ thatthWpth, come ye to the Waters.-— Such alfo is illtlll ^^^^^" John 7. 37. Jefus Jiood and cried, faying. If ^XXX.^'^'^^ ^«V Man thirjf, let him come to me and drink. Such J»%V^^^^.*^.fi an Offer there alfo is in Rev. 22. 17. The Spirit and the Bride fay. Come. And let him that is athirjl come : And whofo- cver willy let him take the Water of Life freely. Such an Offer is alfo implied in John 4. 10. Jefus faid unto her. If thou kneweji the Gift cf Gcdy and zvho it is that faith to thee. Give me to drink ; thou mouldefl have afked him, and he would have given thee living Water, Now, all that is here neceflary to my prefent Purpofe, is to fhew, that an Offer of the Waaler of Life, or of this living Water, does cer- tainly contain or imply in it, an Ofl:er of the Grace of Regeneration. And to make this evident, I fhrill ( i ) endeavour to prove, that the Grace Part II. Chap.XI. J Grace defended. 105;'^ Grace of Regeneration, or a Principle of faving Grace and Holinef'?, is the very Thing intended by the Water of Life, in Scripture : But if that may not be admitted, then (2) it miift be implied and com- prehended in that which othcrwife is intended by it. Firji^ I will endeavour to fhev/, that by the IVciter of L'lfc^ the Grace of Regeneration is in Scripture intended : And this I will en- deavour to make evident, by comparing fome of the Pl;\ces of Scrip- ture that fpeak of it. In ^ohn 4. 10. our Lord having fpoken of this Water, in fuch Language as plainly implieth an OfFer of it, and his Readinels to give it to fuch as afk it of him, lie after fome further Difcourfe with the Woman of Sainaria^ gives her this further Ac- count of the Advantages which fuch have by it, as receive it of him. Verfe 14. JVhofocver dr'mkith of the Water that I fljall give h'lm^ Jhall never thirfl : But the JVater that I JJmU give him^pallbein hirn'a Well of Water fprlng'ing up to everlafiing Life. In which XVords of our Lord he plainly intimates, that this Water is fomething, which the Perfons partaking of it, have within them, as a living Pri^ici'ple of Life and Motion ; by which Principle of Life, what can'we fo well under*-' Itand as that divine Nature given to Men in their Regeneration'?' Of which we read £2;^/^. ,37. 14. Eph. 2, 2, 2 Pet. 2. ^. Or, If not this, the Spirit himfelf, who is the Author, Beftower and Prr - ferver of this divine Principle ? Which of thefe is to me equal, and comes to the fame Thing. - : I'l " Again, our Saviour, in John 7. 37. having invited thirty vSinners to come to him, and drink, (of the \Vater of lafe, no doubt) he adds in Verfe 38. He that believeth on me^ as the Scripture hath fa id, out of his Belfy fia/l foiu Rivers of living Water \ By which Water, that we might underftand what he intended, the Evangelifi: immediately fub- joins. thefe Words, in Verfe 39. This he fpake of the Spirit^ ivhicb they that believe m him Jhould receive. Now, what can this pofTibly intend, if by -it be not meant either tlie Perfon of the Holy Spirit, or that divine Principle which he is the Author of, in Men's Souls, as before. The Belly, out of which thefe Waters are faid to flow, may be underftood to mean the inward Parts, or Heart, as by comparing foh 15. 35.,witli PfaL. ^i. 6. does appear.: And what we may un- (lerftand by this Vv^aters flowing from thence, we may gather from Luke 6. 45. J good Man out of the good Treafure-cfhis- Heart ylfitig- eth forth that which is good ', with which agreefh that in Pfal. 40. 8. / delight to do thy Will^ God : Ti^a, thy Lcvj is within 7m Heart. P . ' The io6 Grace defended. { chaI.xi! The Scripture of the old Tcftamcnt, to which thefe Words of our Saviour, may, I think, be fuppofed to refer, may be fuch as we have in Ifa'i. 44. 3, 4, 5. and Chap. 49. 10. and 58. 11. the laft of whichTexts Ifhall only here tranfcribe,as agreeing well with this Place and that before mentioned, John 4. 14. ne Lord Jlmll guide thee continually^ and fail sfy thy Soul in Droughty and make fat thy Bones'. And thou /halt be like a watered Garden^ and like a Spring cf JVatcr^ zvhofe IVaters fail not. There is one Exception to which, what I here plead for, may feem liable, vIt:. That the Evangelift fays, that our Lord here fpake of the Spirit, which they that believe on him fliould receive : For the Holy Gholl was not yet given, becaufe Jefus was not yet glori- fied : By which it feems as if our Lord here intended thofe extraor- dinary Gifts of the Holy Spirit given at Fentecoji^ after his Afcenfion, Acis 2. beginning, according to that Prophecy in Joel 2. 28, 29. Now to this I anfwer. That tho* there be no Doubt but that our Lord had a Refpecl to the mentioned extraordinary Gifts ; yet to reftrain his Meaning to thefe only, without taking into what he in- tended, the giving of the Holy Ghoft, for the Converfion of great Numbers of Souls about that Time, is, I think, altogether without Warrant. I know of no Expofitors that {o reftrain the Senfe of that Prophecy in focl^ to thofe extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit men- tioned, or to any other in the Days of Chriit and his Apoftles, or at any other Time afterwards, as not to include thofe that are common to all Believers : And our Saviour warrants our expounding it in this Manner, by fpeaking of his giving the Spirit, as the Privilege of Believers in general, without any Exception, in the Place difcourfed on, and elfewhere, as in Roin. 8. 9. and ASs 2. 38, 39. If it be faid, that none can believe in Chrift, 'till the Spirit of Gpd in his faving Influences be given to them ; And therefore, the Grace fiven in Men's firft Converfion cannot be given to them by Promife ; fliall, befides what has been already faid to this> hereafter take thi^ Obje the Gift of the Grace of Regeneration , and io an . ; \ Offer ct AP. xn'. } Grace defended. 107 Offer of Jefus Chrift will imply an Offer of that. As Jefus Chrift is fometimes called the Bread cf Life \ fo if it be allowed that he is here called the Water of Life alfo, an Offer of the (jrace of Regenera- tion will be ftill implied in an Offer of Him. Tliofe who come unto him are fa'd to come as to a living Fountain^ r Pet. 2. 4. And he may be undcrflood to be intended by that Fountain opened^ Zach. 13. I. if it then be fuppofed, that Jefus Chrift himfclfis the VVater of Life here intended, the offering of this Water to Sinners, is an ofter- ing of him to them. But then Jefus Chrifl thus offered unto fmful Men, is offered with all his Fulnefs to them, even all that Fulnefs of which we read Col. i. 18, 19. and ^ohn i. 14, 16. and if fo, then to be fure not without his Spirit and Grace in and with him *, which is the Point for which I, in this Effay, am obliged earneffly to contend. C H A P. X I L Thofe conditional Offers of fpiFitual Wifdo^n made to Sinners in the TVord of Gody are Offers of a Principle of faving Grace or Holinefs. ^^^^i:%^*Sf^^ Purfuance of what I defign in this Chapter, I T^i^^l^'^ "^"^ flicw, that there are fuch Promifes as I here *' ^ ' ?^ fpeakof; and then prove, that thefc Promifes cou- \^ tain or imply in them a conditional Offer of ^ Principle of faving Grace or Holinefs. And I fliall ^^, S endeavour to make this good in both the Parts of %V^^'^'^^^^\*^*<^ it, with Refpe61: to two Promifes, or rather one and the fame, expreffed in tv/o Texts of Scripture ^ one of wliich we have in the tld Tejfamenty the other in tlie mw. ' I fliall begin with that In the old Teftament, which we have in Prtrj. 2. beginning. That We may at once fee it with the Condition on which it is made, with a Reafon given for the certain Fulfilment Qi it; I fliall tranfcribe the Words from the fiifl to ±z iix'Ji V'crfc, ^ See Part n. Chap, iv^ P 2 .^Tj io8 Grace defended. | chIp. xn. My Son, if thou wilt receive my Words, and hide my Commandments with thee ; fo that thou incline thine Ear imto TVifdom^ and apply thine Heart to UmLrJlanding : Tea, if thou crieft after Knowledge, ard Vtfteft up thy Voice fr IJnderfianding : If thou feekeft her as Silvtfr, and fear chef i for her, as for hid Treafures: Then fait thou underjland the Fear of the Lord ; and find the Knowledge of God, For the Lord giveth Wifdom ; Out of his Mouth Cometh Kmivledge and Underflanding, It cannot be denied that thefe Words run in. the P'orm of a con- ditional Promife : My Son, if thou wilt do thus and thus, then fhalt thou, ^c. And in order to our rightly underftanding the Text, we mud confider, (i) to whom this Promife is made, (2) on what Conditions, (3) what is the Good promifed, (4) the Reafon given for the Confirmation of the Truth of th^ Promife. T. Let us confider to whom this Promife is made. And herfe I fhall only infift on one Thing, viz. That this Prcmife is undoubtedly inade WPerfons in an unregenerate State, as well as unto fuch as are regenerate or born again. It is evident that it is the Scope and De- fign of the Place, to dire£l Perfons how they may get true Wifdom, that which is of the beft Kind : And indeed this is the Scope of the ■whole Book of Pre can doubt of this that will be at tl>e Trouble to compare this Promife with what we have in Pfal. 25. 14. and 51. 6. and 19. 18, 19. i John 2. 27. John 17. 8. Bro^i. 3. 13, and Chap. 2. 10, 11. Such as are wife to Salvation know the V/ifdom here intended to he th?.t mentioned Job 28. 28. and Pfal. III. 10. We have in the Place under Confideration a Reafon given to con- fir m to us the Truth of the Promife made, Verfe 6. For the Lord -^jvstb IVtfdom ; Out ofhh Mmh (om^tf? KuQivl^dge and Undtrjlandingy . ■ i. e. Hi Grace defended { chap.xil i. e. he that thus promifeth to beftow fpiritual Wirdom on fueh as come up to the Terms on which it is offered, is the Lord Jehovah, who is the only and all-fufEcient Giver of thatWifdom, by whichMcn are made vj'ife to Salvation ; he being the Father of Lights^ from whom every good and per fe^ Gift comcth dozvn, Jam. i. 17. Therefore wc may afluredly depend on him for the Good thus promifed, if we take the Courfe which he dirc6leth us to for the obtaining of it. I may now proceed to the other Teftimony I intended, for the Confirmation of what I have afferted ; and that is in the new Tefta- ment, Jam. i. 5. If any of you lack IVifdo^n, let him ofk it of God, that giveth to all Alen liberally, and uphraidcth not, and it Jl)all he given to hinu This Text is very much like that laft produced and vindicated ; and therefore I fhall need fay the lefs upon it. The firft Thing that I fhall fay on it is, that tlie Thing promifed in it is Wtfdom ; and this Joubtlefs the fame Kind of Wifdom as that defcribed by the fame Apoftle, Chap. 3. Verfe 17. The JVifdom that is from above, is firji fiire^ then peaceable,' gentle, and eafy to he entreated, full of Mercy, and good Fruits, without Partiality and without Hypccrify, By which Wif- dom the Apoftle doubtlefs intendcth that which is truly fpiritual and faving ; and this not only Wifdom neccffary in fome particular Cafe, as when Perfons are under Affli(5lion and Tribulation, as in the fore- going Verfcs, but alfo in every other Cafe 3 fuch as is intended Jcb 28. 28. and Prov. 2. 10. The Perfons to whom this Promife is made are any that lack Wif- dom, as in the Text, If any of you lack JFifdom — . For tho' this Epiftle was more immediately written to thofe mentioned in the In- fcription of it, Chap. i. Verfe i. yet it was no Doubt intended for the Inftruclion and fpiritu?! Good of all that read it ? For thus the Spirit of God fpeaking in the Scripture, is to be underftood, Rom. 2. 29. Mark 13.37. And who is there that lacketh this Kind of Wifdom more than thofe do, that have none of it; which is the Cafe of all unregeneratePerfons. But if it (hould be here fi\id,that by fuch as lack ■this Wifdom, v/e may underftand fuch as are fenfible of their Need of it ; to this I anfwer. That tho' I cannot believe that the Direction here is given only to fuch, inafmuch as it may encourage thofe that are not yet duly fenfible how much they need it, to endeavour to become fo ; yet fuppofmg this to be true, there is no Reafon to quef- tion, but that Perfons ftill in an unregenerate State may be fenfible that thay need fpiritual \Vifdom. Thofg that a/e fenfible that they need '■ Happinef?, Cha'^.xil } Grace defended. 113 Happinefs : And I believe it is poiTible, that an unregenerate Perfon may be convinced that it is impoiTible that he fliould be made truly happy and blcfTed, without being made fpiritually wife. I know that natural Men are apt to place their Happinefs in fenfual Objc6ls ; but is it not polTible for them to be convinced of their Error and Miftake in this, 'till after they are favingly converted ? I incline to tell People who iwc convinced of this, that it belongs to the Work ordinarily required as preparatory to Converfion, rather than as an eflential Ingredient in it : For how fhould any fincerely turn to God, 'till firft convinced of the Vanity cf the Creature ? If an awaken'd Sinner tells me, he is convinced that Nothing in any Creature, or in all of them together, can make him truly happy, I cannot^ on this Account, tho' I believe him, afiure him that he is in a jEQilverted' State. The next Thing to be confidered is, theConditlon required in order to the obtaining the Wifdom intended ; and this is, that they afk it of God ^ vjho giveth liberally^ and uphraideth not. Here obferve, (i) That fuch as need tliis Wifdom are required to afk for it. (2) They are required, in afking it, to apply to a right Obje£l, wz. God. (3) Here is fomething to encourage them to do fo, viz. He giveth liberally^ and upbraideth ?iot. (i) If Sinners need fpiritiial Wifdom^ they muft afk for it. The Way of obtaining it is not to acquire it by hard Study, but by Prayer, There is a Sort of Wifdom that may be acquired by Study and Me- ditation, as other acquired Gifts and Qualifications are ; but this is not of that Kind, nor obtained in that Way, (tho' necefTary in the Work preparatory to it) but by fervent Prayer, called in Scripture ajking^feekirig^ knocking^ Matth. 7. 7, 8. Luke 11. 9, 10. (2) Thofe that defire this Wifdom mufl feek it of a right Obje(5l, who is able and willing to beflow it, viz. God. So in the l>xt. Let him ajk it of God. The moft learned Men in the World* cannot give this Wifdom, by the beft Inftru6tions they can afford : Onlv God can do this, as we faw before. Prov. 2. 6. The Lord giveth Wifdo?n : Out of his Mouth co?neth Knowledge and Underjlanding, And this Knowledge cometh out of God's Mouth, not only by Means of the Scriptures which he has given by the Infpiration of his Spirit j but as the Light did which he gave in the Creation of the World, Gen, I. 3. with which v/e may compare, 2 C^^r. 2.6. And I may add, Q. . that 114 Graoe defended. \ Part II. Chap.XIL that when we afk this Wifdom, we muft afk it in the Kanie of Jefus Ghrift, as we muft all other Merci^. (3) Here is Ground of Encouragement thus to afk this Wifdom of God, VIZ. He giveth liberally^ and upbraideth not: He giveth to all that afk for it as they ought to do. He giveth not as Pferfons of nar- row Souls are wont to give their Gifts ; nor does he twit and upbraid thofe who in their Straits feek his Favours : And this, if there had been no more faid, gives great Encouragement to afk fpiritual Wif- dom of him. But as if this was not enough, there is in the Words a pofitive Pro- mife, that thofe who alk it in the Manner required, fhall obtain it r It Jhall be given Imn ; exadly anfwering to what we had before in' Prov. 2. 5. Then /halt thou under/land the Fear of the Lord 3 and find the Knowkdge of God. Biit I expeft that, agalnft what I plead for the Support of my Hy- pothefis from this Text, what follows in the two next Verfes will be objected, viz. But let him ojk in Faith., nothing wavering : For he that waver eth is like a Wave of the Sea^ driven with the Wind., and iojfed. For let not that Man think that he Jhall receive any Thing of the Lord. If thefe Words be obje6led againft what I hold and plead for, I fuppofe the Strength of the Objection (if it have any) depends on this, that fuch a Kind of Faith as that defcribed Verfc 6. is required to fuch a fuccefsful afking of Wifdom as that fpoken of in Verfe 5. is what an unregenerate Sinner cannot poflibly be the Subjeft of, but fuch only as are already in a regenerate Statej and fo truly and fpiri- tually wife ; and that the Wifdom promifed to be given to fuch afkers of it as are intended in the Place, muft be more oi the fame Kind that they are endowed with. Now in Anfwer to this feveral Things may be faid, I. I readily grant, that the Afking intended in Verfe 5. muft be an Afkin* in Faith : Otherwife it is not fuch as the Promifti is there made to. And indeed it is, I think, impoflible, that 2lny Prayer at all fhould be made to God, without fome Kind of Faith in him. Prayer is 2L coming to God for the Favours we need, and defire him to grant to us. But we are afTured in Heb. 11. 6. that, he that cometh to God muft believe that he is., and that he is a Rewarder of them that diligently feek him. So that there can be no fuch Thi^ig as coming to God without believing in him. To the fame Efie^ is it demanded in Rom, Chap, xil } Qracc defended. 115 Rom. 10. 14. How Jhall they call on him, imvhom they have not be- lieved P As Men cannot, in a gracious and holy Manner, come to or call upon God, without that Kind of Faith which is peculiar to Per- fons in a juftified and regenerate State ; fo they cannot, in any Man- ner, draw near to God, and call on his Nam-e, without fome Kind of Faith '3 at leaft fuch as unrcgenerate Perfons may be the Subjects of. 2.. I affirm, that it is poffible for unrcgenerate Perfons to believe in God, and in his Son Jefus Chrift. Many fuch have believed. Many unrcgenerate Perfons have believed there is a God, Jam. 2. 19. And many unrcgenerate Perfons have had Faith in Jefus Chrift, as is evident in John 2, 23, 24. and Chap. 12. 42, 43. J(^s 8. 13. Matth. 13. 20, 21. Luke 8. 13. That Text therefore, i John 5. i. Whofoever helieveth that Jefus is the Chriji^ is horv of God, muft be underftood of a Kind of Faith or Believing peculiar to God's Elc£i:, already in a regenerate State. The fame may be faid concerning P^/^r's Faith, Matth, 16. 16, 17. and their's alfo in A^s 13. 48. Otherwife I know of no Pro.pofition in our holy Religion but what may be believed or afTented unto by Perfons in an unrcgenerate State. Unrcgenerate Perfons have the fame objecStive Revelation of divine Truths, and the fame rational Evidence to ground their Perfualion of them upon, as the Regenerate have ; and this Evidence is fufiicient to demand their AfTent, and to command it, did they not wilfully refufe to attend to it. If this were not fo, unrcgenerate Perfons tliat do not aflent to divine Truths might juilify their not believing : For no Man is bound to believe that, of which he has not, or cannot have, fufficient Evidence. For, 3. Unrcgenerate Perfons are able to underdand the Evidence o;fvett or offered to them, to fatisfy them of the Truth of thofe Tilings which they are required to believe j (o that if they believe them not, 'tis becaufe they fhun the Light, and will not confider as they may and ought to do, thofe P-^vidences which God favours them witli ; having an Enmity in their Hearts againft the Truths and Objects re- vealed. 4. All unrcgenerate Sinners do not thus obrtinately fhut their Eyes againft the Light. They are by common Grace prevailed with to make a better Improvement of the Advantages they enjoy, than others ^0, Nor is the Sin of thofe that refufe Inflrud^on, in this Way ofFe- Q.2 red 1 1 6 Grace defended. \ J^^^ xil red to them, unavoidable, fo that they cannot come to the Knowledge of the Truth, but muft neceflarily remain Infidels or Unbelievers. 5. The Perfuafion vi'hich fome unregenerate Sinners do, in this Way, attain, is fo firm and ftrong, that it has a great Influence on their Lives. They receive the Word with Joy, and do many Things that are required of them. Such a Perfuafion as thefe have, or may have, of the Truth, is fufficient to produce Repentance in Sackcloth and AJhes ; infomuch that fuch are fometimes faid to have efcaped the Pol- lutions that are in the Worlds thro* the Knowledge of our Lord and Sa- viour Jefus Chrifi^ 2 Pet. 2. 20, 21. and to have been enlightned ^^nd to have tajledthe heavenly Gift ^a,nd to have been madePartakers of the Holy Ghojl^ and to have tajled the good Word of God, and the Powers of the World to come^ Heb. 6. 4, 5. Such an Aflurance of divine Truths as Perfons not favingly eon- verted may, in this Way attain, is fufficient to render them utterly inexcufable if they engage not in the Pra6lice of religious Duties, fuch as Praying to God in publick, private and fecret ; and Waiting on him in all the other Ways of his own Appointment, for his faving and everlafting Mercies, and in particular for that fpiritual Wifdom here under Confideration : So that fuch Perfons need not be at fuch Uncertainties, with Refpeft to the Truth of God's Word, as not to afk thefe Mercies in Faith ; efpecially if they are taught, as I think they fhould be, that God has firmly promifed thefe fpiritual Bleffings to thofe that, in a right Manner, afk them of him. They may then ajk them in Faith without zuavering, like a Wave of the Sea, that is driven with the Windy and toffed, as in the Text objected : Or like double-minded Men who are nnflahle in all their Ways^ Verfe 8. But on the contrary, they may with fome Steadfaftnefs and Conftancy, watch at Wifdo?n^s Gates , &c. Prov. 8. 34. and not grow weary in well- doings nor draw back to Perdition , as fome do. See E-zek, 33. 13. Heb. 10. 38. Matth. 24. 12, 13. I might have here fhown the Difference betwixt this Kind of Faith, and that peculiar to the Regenerate ; but for this I fhall refer my Reader to Chap. III. of this fecond Part of my Effay : And I (hall hereafter have Occafion to fay fomethiBg further to it. CHAP. chap..xiii; } Grace defended. 117 CHAP. XIII. That the co?tditional Promifes of fpecial Mercy inade to fuch as come to Jesus Christ, do contain and hnply m them a Promife of renge?ierating Grace. *J^^^:^1trZ'^ H E PromifQS which I here intend are fuch as thefe *^t-#^^#C^#^^ following, viz. Matth. 11. 28. Cotne unto me all vtH^ •c^ ^* V C*^ ye that labour^ and are heavy laden^ and I will give you y**f*f "^t*!'^ ^^- M" 6. 35. Amljefusfaid unio them, I am %!^Xf^%% ^^'' B^'^^ ^f Life : He that co7neth to me fho.ll never 3fS^Sl 2; P^^Sf Hunger j and he that believcth on me JJ:all nevcrThirJi. ^^^^^J»^V^^ So again in Verfe 37. All that the Father givelh me, Jhall come to me ; and him that comeih to ?ne, I will in no zuife caft out. Such a Promife is alfo fuppofed and implied in John 5. 40. Te will 7Jot come to me^that ye might haveLife. In thefePlacesJefusChrift freely i'lvites all fmful Men, to whom the Gofpcl is preached, to come to him for Life aiTd Happinefs, promifmg that if they do, they fhall ob- tain what they come to him for. Now, this being allowed, as I think it cannot be denied, I fhall here briefly confider (i) What the Promifes are which Sinners fhould go to Jefus Chrifl for. (2) How they fhould go to Chrift for thefe Benefits. (3) The Security given them, that fo doing, they fhall obtain them. I. Let us confider what thofe Benefits are which Sinner? are in- vited to go to Jefus Chrift for. Now to this I fay in general, that there i^ no Reafon to doubt but that they arc invited to go to Chrifl for all fpiritual Bleflings, or for all thofe everlafling Mercies which he freely beftows on all thofe whom he eternally favcs ; all that Ful- nefs which he has in himfclf, and which is by his People derived from ■him, as in Col. i. 19. John i. 14, 16. That Pardon of Sin, or Juftification and Adoption are among thofe BlefTmgs, which Sinners are invited to go to Chrifl: for, is not, I think, at all queflion*d a- mono; 1 1 8 Grace defended, \ ct,AP.xiii! mong us ; and fo alfo the Happinefs enjoy'd by true Saints in their Communion with God here in this Life, and in that which is to come. All the Qiieftion here is, whether unregenerate Sinners who enjoy fuch Invitations by the Gofpel, as thofe above exprefled, are not there- in invited to go to Jefus Chrift alfo for that Principle of fpiritual Life which is given in Regeneration ? And this I am perfuaded they are ; and can hardly think that any orthodox Divine will deny it. Is not every unregenerate Sinner who enjoys the Gofpel, bound to pray as David ^\A in Pfal. 51. ig. Create in me a clean Hearty O God, and renew a right Spirit within me. Indeed, we have no Reafon to doubt o{ David's being in a regenerate State, when he thus prayed : But it being after his great Sin and Fall, as appears by the Title of the Pfalm, and is further confirmed by the Contents of it, he may be juftly fup- pofed to have been under a Cloud, with refpedl to his fpiritual State, and to have wanted that Senfe of God's Love, which formerly he en- joyed. Several of his ExpreiTions in the Pfalm lead us to think fo j it is therefore no Wonder if he now called the Sincerity of his Heart, and the Truth of his Converfion, in Queftion, and fo prayed for anew Heart, as if he had never before had fuch an Heart given to him : But he could not defire this but only on Suppofition that he had not already what he was concerned that he might not fail of. And thus any Saint that knows not that he is already in a regenerate State, may pray that he may be born again. And thofe that are indeed deftitute of true Grace fliould pray for it as Ephraim did, Jer. 31. 18. Turn thou me,, and I Jhall he turned \ And that is to go to Chrift, and to God in and by him, for it. We are told, in A5:s5. 31. That he is exalted to he a Prijice and a Saviour ; to grant Repcntajjce and RemiJJion of Sins ; no Doubt the Grace of true Repentance, as well as the A6ts and Ex- ercifes of it : And this fliews us that Sinners Ihould go to him for this Grace, as unto one that has the Words of eternal Life, John 6. 68. The wicked Jews refuiing to do this, was no Doubt one great Part of the Crime with which our Lord charged them, John 5. 40. Te will not come unto me that ye mJght have Life. Or, fhall we fuppofe they \tee only to go to Chrift for Pardon, and not for the Grace of Rege- neration, which he alfo merited for his People, and which they can have no other Way than thro' him, who is that Plead of Influence, by which his whole Body is animated and nouriftied, ; and who Ijfving Life in himfelf quickneth whom he will^ Col. i. 18,19. and John i. 16. and Chap. 5. 26, 27. Thus, I think it is fufficiently evident, that unregenerate Pcrfons ought to go to Jefus Chrift for fpiritual Life, or for the Grace of Regeneration, 2. I chap.xiil } Grace defended. 119 2. I am to fhew how Sinners arc to go to him for this Grace. And here I will venture to fay negatively^ They are not required to go to him for it in theExercife of the fame Kind of Grace. Is it pofTible for any rational Men to think, that God requiring unregenerate Sin- ners to go to Jefus Chrift for a Principle of fpiritual Life, which they are yet without, would require them to come to him for it, in the Ex- ercife of that very fame Kind of Grace which he requires them to feck after, and beg for ? This is too abfurd to be believed. What then, are the Unregenerate in feeking to Jefus Chrifl for the Grace of Regeneration, required to come to him in Faith, or without any ? Surely they are not required to come to Chrift without Faith : That would be a ftrange Way of coming, if any at all. How fhould they come to their Saviour without having any Faith in him ? It is impoffible. Heh. ii. 6. Rom. lo. 14. How fliould Perfons call on Jefus Chrift, as in Mat. 8. 25. Lord^ fave us^ we perijh ; or as in Verfe 2. Lord, if thou wilt, thou canfl make me clean, if they do not believe him able to do thefe Things for them ? And the Reafon is tJie fame if we go to him for a new Heart, or to give us fpiritual Life. But how fhould Perfons go to Chrift in Faith^ for fuch a Mercy, who are not yet born again ? I anfwer. That the Myjiery is ibis, that Perfons may have Faith in Chrift, tho' they are not yet born of the Spirit, as in John 3. 16, or have not yet been made Partakers &fthe divine Nature, as in 2 Pet. i. 4. I have proved this in Chap. XII. to which I here refer my Rea- der. And I am not yet convinced, that it is impoftible for a Sinner not yet born of God, and that has no other Faith than a Perfon in that Eftate may have, to go to Chrift for regenerating Grace, or for a new Heart ; but I am thoro'ly convinced, that no Sinner is required to go to Chrift for the Grace of Regeneration, in the Exercife of the fame Kind of Grace. 3. We may now confider the Security given to all that come to Chrift, in the Manner intended, that they fhall obtain the Benefits conditionally promifed to them ; and fo with the reft, the Grace of Regeneration : And the Promife for this is as full and exprefs in the Places quoted, as can be defired. Such Jhall never Hunger nor thirjl^ John 6. 35. Chrift will by no Means cajl thetn out, Veffe 37. They ih2i\\ find Re/l to their Souls, Matth. 11. 28. Which Prornifes can never be made good to fuch as go to Jefus Chrift for his cverlafting Mercies offered to tliem in the Gofpel, unlefs the Grace of Regenera- tion 120 Grace defended. { Si^.xrfe tion be beftowed on them, that being one of thofe for which they are invited to go to him, as I have already fhewed. 'And, as if a Promife without an Oath had not been fufficient, both have been ( for the better Satisfaction of fuch as by Reafon of Infirmity need it) given to them, Heh. 6. 17, 18. The Promife and Oath of God here men- tioned, does not only afford Matter of Confolation to fuch as have already y?t'<^y^r Refuge^ to lay hold en the Hope fet before them ; but alfo great Encouragement to others to do fo, who have not yet done it. Nor ought Sinners to ftay till they are born of the Spirit, before they begin thus to do ; tho' they fhould continue coming to Chrill after they are born of God, as appears in i Pet. 2. 2, 3, 4. Thofe ■who intend never to go to God in Chrift for his faving Adercies, will be in great Danger of going forever without them. CHAP. XIV. ^hat there are conditt07tal Promifes made in the Gofpely to fuch as persevere and over- come, which contain in them Offers of the Grace >) that Perfeverance is required of fuch as v/ould be Partakers of God's faving Mercies, in order to their obtaining them ; and not only that for a Moment they are qua- lified, as has been exprefTed. This will be further manifeft-, if we confider, that we may well diflinguifh betwixt a Condition on which a Benefit is offered, confi- dered materially, or in Refpe£l of the A61 or A6ts wherein it confift- eth ; and confidered with RefpecSl to the Prolongation or Continuance of the Thing required: If we confider the Nature of the Things re- quired, Perfons may, in that Refped, have all that is demanded of them, and yet not have a Right to theBenefits conditionally promifed ; becaufe they have not continued the (^jalifications demanded, fo long as is required of them, in order to their having a Right. R 2 Thus 1 24 Grace defended. \ chaIxiv! Thus in the firft Covenant made with Man, he might for a Time continue in that Obedience which was required of him, and yet have no Right to the Life conditionally promifed ; becauie he had not flood in Innocency the whole Term of that State of Probation which was by God defigned for his Trial. And I know no Reafon why it may not be fo under the new Covenant alfo ; nay, it feems certainly to be fo, inafmuch as God docs not only require fuch Qualifications as are mentioned in the Covenant, but alfo Perfeverance in the Per- formance of what is required ; that is, God requires that we keep Covenant with him, in order to his faving us ; and this not by one tranfient Kdi only, but by our conftant Obedience to his Command- ments, 'till we obtain his offered Mercies, as mPfal. 25. 10. and 103. 17, 18. That the Senfe which I have given of the Promifes under Confide- ration, is very agreeable with the Scope of the Places wherein we find them, will (I think) appear if we confider them in Conne6lion with the Context, to which they refpecSlively belong. In that Matth. 10. 22. thofe Chriftians to whom the Promife intended has a Re- ference, are fuppofcd to be liable to violent PerfecUtions, under which they would be in great Danger of falling away, as ftony-ground Hearers are many of them fuppofcd to do, in Matth. 13. 20, 21. and in the other Evangelifts. They are therefore encouraged with a Promife of Salvation, in Cafe they fhould perfevere, which they v/ould not have been in Danger of not doing, if they had been pajfed from Death to Life^ in the Senfe intended in John 5. 24. Thofe in Matth, 24. 13. are fpoken to as liable to grievous Temptations, by Reafon of that abounding of Iniquity there foretold, which Ihould occafion the Love of 77iany to ivax coldy as in Verfe 12. and fo are encouraged to take Heed of Apoftacy, from the Confideration of that gracious Pro- mife made to fuch as perfevere ; viz. that if they fhould endure to the End., they fhould be faved ; they believing only y^r a while ^ as in Luke 8. 13. I may here add, that when fome, in the mentioned Place, Matth. 1 3, have Salvation promifed to them, in Cafe they fhould not fall away, as others would do ; the Antithcfis cxprefTed in the Words plainly fhew, that the fame Kind of Faith or Religion is intended in both Cafes : So that of the fame Sprt of Believers fome might fall away, and perifb, and others perfevere, and be faved : And if thofe who are fuppofcd to fall away, fliould not do fo, but fliould continue to believe, they fhould be faved alfo. The like may be faid with Refpecl to that Text, Heb. 10. 36, 38, 39. Te have Need of Patience 3 that after ye have done the JVill of Gcd, ye Chap. XIV. } Grucc defended. 125 j/^ may receive the Promife. Now the JuJ} Jhall live by Faith : But if any Man (or, as it is in the Original, 1 am toKl, if he) draw hack., my Soul Jhall' have no Pleafure i?i hi??i. But wc are not of than that draw hack unto Perdition., but of them that believe to the faving of the Soul, I believe it can never be proved that the Faith intended in Verfe 38. is that which is peculiar to the Regenerate ; but the contrary feems evident. I grant that, according to the Text, the Paith intended is of the fame Kind with that by which the Jult do li\T, that is, it is of the fame Kind of Faith with that which is required as the Conditi- on of the Covenant of Grace : And what Kind of Faith that is, I have fufficiently fhewed, and proved it cannot be that given in Regenera- tion. Moreover, when it is faid, Th\\L the JuJi^Jhall live by Faith, and it thereupon follqweth. If any Man draw back., &c. it feemcth evident, .that the fame Kind of Faith is by fome fallen from, which others 'perfevere in the Exercife of, to the faving of their So^jls. Therefore, when it is faid. The Jiijl Jhall live by Faith., the Meaning is. That he (hall do fo, in Cafe he perfevere in Believing, and con- tinueth a juft and righteous Man, in the Senfe in which he is at pre- fent fuch an one ; which many not doing, God's Soul has no fuch Pleafure in them, as he has in thofe who fo do. And tho' fuch as are the Subjeds of the Faith intended, are called Jujl., this may not intend that they are fo in the ftri(Steft Senfe of that Word, any more than that the Term Righteous, muft be fo taken, in (what I think to be) a parallel Place, in Ezek. 18. 24, 2.6. But if the Righteous turncih away from his Righteoufnefs, and commit Iniquity, and doth according to the Abominations that the wicked Man doth, Jim II he live P Jll his Righ- teoufnej^s that he hath done, Jhall not he mentioned ; in his Trefpafs that he hath trefpajpd, and in his Sin that he hath fmned, in them fjall he die. When a righteous Mantumeth away from his Righteoufnefs, and co?nmit- teth Iniquity, and dieth in them, for his Iniquity that he hath done Jhall he die. In which Words it is to me fo evident, that by a righteous Man, a regenerate Saint cannot be intended, that I think I need not fpend Time in making the fame manifeft, nor am I alone in this Tho't ; fuch aonebeingfpoken of as falling fhort of Life and Happinefs, by turn- ing away from that Righteoufnefs winch he once had, when otherwife he might and fliould have lived. Compare thjs Place with E'z.ek. 3. 20. and 33. 18. The Righteous intended in thefe Places are, 1 fuppofe, fuch as are mentioned in 2 Pet, 2. 20, 21. and there faid to have efcaped the Pollutions of the JVorld, thro'' the Knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jefus Chrijl, and to have known the IVay of Right eoufnej), but to turn again from the holy Commandmeyit , That fucli righteous Perfons as thefe Ihall be faved, if they perfevere in fuch P^aith and O- bedience 1 26 Grace defended. \ chap.xiv. bedience as they have attained to, is what I here endeavour to main- tain : Not that any can be faved vi^ithout Regeneration ; for Man's Regeneration is his Salvation, Tit. 3. 5. But my Meaning is, that foch as fo believe and obey, fhall obtain both Juftification and Regene- tion, if they perfevere in fo doing : Otherwife, fuch as perfcvcre fliould not be faved, according to the mentioned Promifes. I fhall now proceed to confider the fecond Sort of Promifes inten- ded to be infiited on in this Argument, v'i%. Thofe wherein fpecial Mercies are engaged to fuch as overco7ne ; and in vvhich I fuppofe the Grace of Regeneration to be conditionally promifed. I fhall at pre- fent only infift on two Places, in which, I fuppofe, we have fuch Pro- mifes. The firft of thefe is in Rev. 2. 17. To him that overcomethy will I give to eat of the hidden Manna., and will give hi??i a white Stone ^ and in this Stone a new Name written^ zvhich no Man knoiueth^ faving he that rcceiveth it. The fecond Place I intend, is in Rev. 3. 12. Him ihat over Cometh will I make a Pillar in the Temple of my God ; and he jhallgono 7nore out. And I ivill write upon him the Name of my God^ and the Name of the City of mv God^ which is the new ferufale^n, which Cometh down out of Heaven from my God \ and I will write upon hi?n rny new Name. With Refpedl to thcfe Places we may confider, (i) The Subjects unto whom thefe Promifes are made. (2) The Promifes made unto thefe Subjects, and that by Jefus Chrift himfelf, whofe Words thefe are. I. Then, the Subjects unto whom thefe Promifes are made are fuch as overcome. For to him that overcometh., &c. which Words being fpoken indi finitely., muft be underftood of all that overcome, whoever they be. But the Obje6ls over whom the Vi61:ory intended is fup- pofed to be obtained, is not here exprefled, but muft be underftood from what is faid in Scripture, with RefpeiSl: to that Warfare, wherein Chriftians are engaged againft the Fkjh^ the IVorld, and the Devil ^ as in I Tim. 6, 12. £ph. 6. 10, 17. Jam. 4. 7. i Pet. 2. 11. and many other Places. From whence we may gather, that the Vidlory intended, is over all the Enemies of our Souls. Thefe are the Things which we muft overcome, if we would have the Benefits promifed in tlie Words before «s. But we muft confider when or how thefe Things may be faid to be overcome. Now, here it is very necefTary that we obferve, that there are two Periods, in which, or remarkable Degrees of Victory, witli Refpedl whereunto, Profeflbrs of Religion may be faid to overcome their cha^.xiv. } Grace defended. 127 their fpiritual Enemies, or to gain the VicStory over them. One of thefe is when they are firft favingly united unT:o Jefus Chrift, and fo intitled thro' his Merits, to the everlafting Mercies offered in the Gof- pel. The other is when they are adually pofTcfied of all the Good which Jefus Chrirt has purchafed for them ; and which God hath from Eternity purpofed to bcftow ; and arc alfo perfedtly freed from all the Evils which their Sin and Fall had brought on them. Now of thefe two remarkable Seafons and Degrees of the Chriftian's Vi6lory, it will be to my prefent Purpofe to (liy fomething, efpecially of the firfl of them J becaufe they ought here to be carefully diftinguifhed. F'lrji then, Profeflbrs of Reli:iion may befaid to overcome Sin, the World, and the Devil, even all the Enemies of Souls, when by Faith they obtain an Interell in Jefus Chrift, and fo are united to him, and thro' Grace entitled to all the fure and everlafting Mercies of the new Covenant, off"ered to fmful Men in the Gofpel. Whenever any of the fmful Children of Men are thus interefted in Jefus Chrift, their Sins are all pardoned, and their Perfons juftified, by the Righteoufnefs of Chrift imputed to them. They are reconciled unto God, adopted into the Number of his Children, being regenerated by his Spirit, and fo made new Creatures ; And their future Happinefs is as fully fecured to them, whether they know it or not, as if they were actually in the Pofleftion of the Glory of the World to come : So that now their State is that expreffed, John 5. 24. Verily^ verily^ I fay unto yoii^ he that heareth my JVord^ and believeth on him that fent me^ hath everlajfing Life\ and foall not co?7ie into Condemnation^ but is pajfed frcm Death to Life. And Rom. 8. i, 2. There is therefore 7ww no Condemnation to them that are in Chriff Jefus ^ who walk not after the FleJJo^ but after the Spirit, For the Law of the Spirit in Chrift Jefus ^ hath made me free from the Lavj of Sin and Death. With thefe Places do many others a- gree, fome of which I ftiall only here refer to, as Rom. 8. 32,-39. Rom. 6. 14. ijchn 3. 9. John 3. 29. i John 5. 28. Pfal. 32. 12. Rom. 4, 7, 8. John 10. 27, 29. i Pet. i. 3,-5. When eternal Happinefs is thus fecured to any of the Children of Men, they maybe well faid to have overcome ; (tho' they arc not paft having any new Aflault made on them by their fpiritual Enemies, and fuftering greatly by them) (o that it may be faid to everv true Saint, as in i John 2. 13. le have overcome the wicked one. There- fore holy Paul, being juftified by Faith in Chrift, could fay, as in 2 Tim. 4. 7, 8. I have fought the good Fight., IhavefinifhedmyCourfey I have kept the faith. Henceforth th^n is laid up for me a Crown of RightKufnff^ 128 Grace defended. { chIp.xiv: Righteoufncfs, zvhich the Lord the righteous Judge Jljall give me at that Day; and not to me only ^ but unto all them alfo that love his Appearing, Note here, that thefe Words of the Apoftle, / have kept the Faith, cannot mean that he had perfevered to the End of his Life ; but that he had done fo, till he had fecured his future and eternal Happinefs, as in the fore-mentioned John 5. 24. And fuch a Vi6lory has every godly Man obtained over the Enemies of his Soul, tho' many fuch are not, as Paul, aflured of this. But there is yet. Secondly, a further Victory to be fought and ob- tained by Chriltians, over their fpiritual Enemies, and all Things that hinder their compleat Happinefs, even over all the Evils that trouble and moleft them : For vs^hich Victory they muft vi^ait patiently, 'till their fpiritual Warfare be fully accomplifhed, which it vi^ill not be while they live in this World : Nay, their laft Enemy will not be de- ftroyed, 'till their Refurredion from the Dead, i Cor. 15. 26. Now the Chriftian's Progrefs towards this compleat Vi