.0 Q. c < E , STATE OF RELIGIOUS PARTIES IN ENGLAND. BY ROBERT VAUGH AN, D.D. PROFESSOR OF ANCIENT AND MODERN HISTORY IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON. To 5e /ieAAer' dKOVificv, u)S eVeoV irep. 'O.MHP02. " Above all things put on charity, which is the bond of perfectness."— CoLossiAxs iii. 14. LONDON : JACKSON AND WALFOKD, IS, ST. PAUL'S CHURCHYARD. 1838. LOKDOK : K. CLAY, PRINTER, BREAD-STREET-HILr,. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE AND RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES JAMES BLOMFIELD, D.D. LORD BISHOP OF LONDON. My Lord, The substance of the present publication was delivered as a Discourse in Union-Street Chapel, Southw^ark, on the second of January last. Fifty years had then passed since the day on which that chapel was opened for divine worship; and the christian church still assembling there, claims to be regarded as the oldest Independent or Congre- gational church in the kingdom ; tracing its de- scent from a church of that order, formed in the vi DEDICATION. borough of Southwark, by the Rev. Henry Jacob, a seceded clergyman, in the year 1616. Many intelligent and devout persons, to whom these facts were known, became desirous that an occa- sion so well adapted to awaken profitable reflection should not pass without notice. A religious ser- vice, accordingly, took place ; the gentlemen from various congregations who were present, and who afterwards dined together, requested that the Dis- course which they had heard in the morning should be printed, and with this request I signified my compliance. But the observations made in the Discourse have been so far amplified, that I have deemed it advisable to give them the title now prefixed to them, and to publish them in an altered form. I am not aware, however, that any thing material will be found in the following sections, that was not announced in a form more or less distinct from the pulpit. On the whole, therefore, these thoughts may be taken as a fair average view, of the opinions and feehngs of the well-informed and truly decided body of Protestant Noncon- formists who concurred in urging that they should be printed ; and as a tolerably certain indication, of the views entertained by the same class of persons through the kingdom. DEDICATION. vii My Lord, I have not been inobservant of the promptitude, vigour, and directness, by which your mind is characterised, and can readily conceive that before proceeding thus far, you have been about to ask, and with some impatience — what is all this to me ? With what possible propriety am / addressed on a subject of this nature ? With your permission I will answer these questions, and so briefly as not to make any large demand on the time which you know so well how to employ. This I am also anxious to do, under the influence of every sentiment of respect due to your high character and station. Your Lordship's mind is not of an order to be deemed incapable of releasing itself in any degree from the force of prejudice ; and is still further removed, as I am willing to believe, from that want of ingenuousness which has too often placed the most powerful intellects in wilful alliance with error. Still, my Lord, it is inseparable from the station which you fill, that you should be in almost cease- less connexion with sources of communication, tending to produce and strengthen every kind of prejudice against Dissenters; and never has mis- representation, with regard to persons of that viii DEDICATION. class, been more rife than at this moment. The public press, political and religious, is tainted, in this respect, as to the core ; and there are large sections of society which too nearly resemble it. My impression is, that you, my Lord, are not governed by the indiscriminate reckless enmity with which we have to contend in many quarters ; that you are willing rather, if respectfully invited to the subject, to give its full weight to whatever may be offered in behalf of our principles or pro- ceedings as Dissenters ; and it is in consequence of this impression that I have ventured to submit the following thoughts to your consideration, and presume in this place to detain your attention for the space of a few pages. But let me not be mistaken. Our position, as Dissenters, leaves us little to hope or fear from the EstabUshed Church. As a Church, our Episco- palian brethren have nothing to bestow, that we are at liberty to accept ; and could we conceive of them as animated by the most determined hostility against us, there would be nothing even in such an aspect of affairs to make us greatly afraid. Our fathers, who knew but too well what such things mean, knew also how to make evils of that descrip- DEDICATION. ix tion subservient to good ; and their descendants would not be found wanting in the day of trial. But we expect nothing of this kind ; the sound part of the Church of England would be the first to deplore it ; and every pious Dissenter earnestly prays for something far different. I am confident that I express the feeling of the great majority of my brethren, when I say, that for the credit of our common Christianity, and not from any fear about the security or advancement of our interest as Dissenters, I am deeply anxious to see the return of a calmer habit of thought, and of a more christian temper on both sides. Your Lordship, then, has no doubt heard very much of late concerning the restless spirit, and evil designs, of the Dissenters — enough to keep these persons constantly before you, as an un- grateful body of people, who, while sheltered by the favour of a most tolerant Establishment, have become intent — from very wantonness — on doing every kind of injury to that establishment, looking, in fact, to nothing less than its utter spoliation and overthrow. But is it unquestionable, my Lord, that the spirit of the Church of England towards Dissenters, has been on all occasions so X DEDICATION. lenient and kindly as those persons represent ? Is it quite certain also, that Dissenters, as a bod}^, are really chargeable with all the delinquency which the hosts of their enemies impute to them? With regard to the first of these allegations, it describes the past condition of Dissenters in terms singularly at variance mth fact. Is it, for exam- ple, to be accounted nothing, that we have found ourselves in the midst of an artificial system, so framed as to remind us at every point, and every moment, of the social inferiority to which we were subject, on account of our scruples in matters of religion, — scruples, which we knew to be sincere and honourable ? Is it nothing, that for this cause our own Protestant brethren should have possessed the power of thrusting us at all times into a suspicious distance from royalty and court favour ; of placing us at disadvantage in nearly all the avenues which lead to the prizes of public life ; and of obliging us to feel in all connexions, pubhc and private, that we are persons of a lower grade than them- selves in general estimation? Must we deem it nothing, that this favouritism of the state to one religious party, is, in this manner, a positive injury DEDICATION. xi (lone to all who are not included in that favour, and to all whose principles will not suffer them to be included in it ? Has it been nothing, that con- scientiousness has thus come to be a species of crime, exposing men to an almost omnipresent, and often very formidable amount of punishment ? Was it nothing, my Lord, that the Test Act pointed so long at the Dissenter as a man of doubtful character — not to be trusted in any mat- ter that might in the least affect the good of his country? Nothing, that the securities of our property were so long endangered, except as we were prepared to comply with a form of baptism, to which we felt strong religious objections; and that in connecting the sanctities of religion with the institute of marriage, we were so long com- pelled to go from the services of our own ministers to those of the stranger ? Is it nothing even now, that having defrayed the expenses of our own worship, we are subject to constant exaction, in order that we may be made to furnish garniture for the worship preferred by our more wealthy neighbours ; and that our ancient seats of learn- ing, while described as belonging to the nation, and existing as vast sources of emolument and xii DEDICATION. honour, should continue to be accroached to them- selves by the men of one religious party ? Nor has it been enough that these grievances should press upon us. How often, within the last twenty years, have we been assailed with every sort of misrepresentation and abuse. It would be easy to collect volumes of passages of this nature from the visitation discourses, and the periodical and general literature of Churchmen, the scorn and contumely of which nothing could exceed, describing us— in the very language of the men who sent our martyred fathers to the place of execution — as not more than " half Englishmen," because we do not bow the knee to the eccle- siastical supremacy of the crown ; and denouncing our religion, not merely as " destroying more souls than it saves," but as tending only to destroy, and as no better than a covert, under which to indulge, if not in the practice of sedition, certainly in all the malign passions considered as leading to such practices ! While in regard to learning, the com- mon assumption and language has been, that a people so inherently vulgar, cannot possibly have the least pretension to credit on that ground ; DEDICATION. xiii and if proof to the contrary has been sometimes afforded, enough has generally occurred to show how very unwelcome such proof has been. No doubt, my Lord, there are Churchmen who have looked on these things with a regret highly honourable to their candour and generosity ; but while the majority have rather seemed to sympa- thize with all the bitterness and injustice of these proceedings, rarely putting the slightest private or public discountenance upon them, it surely ought not to be matter of surprise if a deep sense of injury on the part of the Dissenter, has some- times broken forth in strong expressions of resent- ment. It is not, assuredly, in your Lordship's nature, nor in the nature of any educated, honourable mind, to look considerately on the condition of a people beset with so many obvious, and so many nameless forms of civil disparagement and wrong, on account of their religion, and then to say of them that they have been wholly without excuse in complaining of grievance, or that they have become justly liable to very heavy censure, if, when the moment for partial redress has seemed to arrive, their desire of change has been found to caiTy them xiv DEDICATION-. somewhat to excess. It is the force of the previous constraint which determines the strength of the rebound. Thrust men into one unnatural extreme, and you prepare them to rush into another, in an opposite direction, on the first opportunity. The elements of insurgency are never so volcanic as when called forth by the rigours of despotism. Dissenters are no exception to this tendency in human nature. If, indeed, we are to consider their vocation to have been, that they should exemplify a perfect intelligence and rectitude in our weak and dis- ordered world, it must be confessed they have not always appeared in their proper character. In that case, they should have looked so com- prehensively, and so profoundly, on the numerous and momentous questions which have recently come into debate, as thoroughly to have understood them. They should have made large allowance for the force of prejudice, and the feeling of interest, in connexion with ancient and opulent institutions. They should have remembered how much there is in the unavoidable weakness of human nature that may lead to self-deception, even in the case of the weU-meaning. They should have been careful to DEDICATION. XV acquaint themselves with all the good, as well as the evil, included in the existing order of things, and should have looked to the contingent injuries which changes apparently the most desirable are often found to carry along with them. If precluded from their place as citizens, and scoffed upon and put down in not a few connexions as religionists, they should have known how to be silent under such treatment, or how to have uttered the lan- guage of complaint, influenced more by pity and forbearance than by resentment. And within the last few years especially, they should, perhaps, have been content with calm and dignified efforts to obtain a removal of their more immediate griev- ances ; and if they had altogether failed in their object, as in that case they probably would, they should have known how to bear such disappoint- ments, so as not to be greatly distressed by them, and so as to have been capable of returning good for evil, and blessing for cursing ! But, my Lord, does it become our opponents, in the greater part of whom this "meekness of wisdom'* has been so lamentably wanting, to demand it from others upon a scale of this sort ? Having acted the firebrand during so many long years, is it seemly in these persons to affect astonishment, and a kind of xvi DEDICATION. horror, on seeing that Dissenters are not always engaged in the offices of the peacemaker ? Can it be a true charity that is found thus capable of hoping all things on one side, and incapable of bearing with the usual indications of human infir- mity on the other ? True, my Lord, we are imperfect beings ; we have not always spoken wisely, nor acted wisely ; but of this I am con- fident, that from the beginning to this day, we have been a people " more sinned against than sinning." The great charge against us, so far as I am able to ascertain, is, that we are aiming at nothing less than the destruction cf the Established Church. Now it is not denied that the principles of Con- gregationalism are opposed to the existence of any civil establishment of Christianity. But it is one thing to be persuaded that a nation might have chosen a wiser course than it has done, and another to fall into a justly censurable mode of proceeding, in order to correct a prevalent error. It may be strictly lawful that there should be no Established Church ; but in the state of society existing in England it may be far from expedient. The whole question, though truly one of principle, is also one DEDICATION. xvii to be determined, in a great degree, by circum- stances. While the social system of England shall be what it is, and while the prevalent feeling in favour of an Established Church shall be what it is, there ought, as I conceive, to be such a church. The Dissenter may say, that the State, in this respect, is exercising a power which it ought not to have assumed ; but so long as the State is not so persuaded, it should not be expected to relin- quish the policy which has naturally resulted from its different consciousness of duty. Principle, on this great question, may be of as much moment to the Churchman as to the Dissenter. And if there are Dissenters, who, having looked to the monarchy and to the court of England ; and to the preposses- sions, on this subject, of the persons who constitute the upper, and even the lower House of Parliament ; and have expected to see these parties concur in any thing approaching toward an extinction of the State Church, such expectation must surely have been indulged in some of those delusive moments when the passions do not allow the under- standing to perform its proper office. But, my Lord, if there are circumstances which seem to require that there should be an Established Church, it should be remembered that there are other xviii DEDICATION. circumstances which demand, and not at all less im- peratively, that it should be one of moderate pre- tensions. If there be a majority to combine in support of such a church, there is a minority dis- senting from it, and one sufficiently powerful to render it necessary that the Endowed Communion should bear their faculties meekly. Were the Church of England to become so far intolerant as to disgust the liberal portion of her members, and to occasion their withdrawment in any great number to the side of Dissent, her days, secure as she may now seem, might not be many. On the whole, my Lord, my own humble con- viction in regard to the Church of England, and that, as I believe, of Dissenters generally, is, not that she should be demolished, or despoiled, but that she should be regarded as pertaining to the religion of the majority, according to the real state of things in England, and not as embodying the religion of the nation, according to the perfect theory of an Ecclesiastical Establishment, as carried out in Por- tugal or Spain ; that on this ground, such a period should be put to the ecclesiastical favouritism of the State, as may prevent any further grants of public money or exclusive privilege to the Endowed DEDICATION. xix Church ; and that in regard to the few matters which as Dissenters we still feel to be vexatious indications of civil inferiority in consequence of our religious preferences, we should continue to seek a removal of them until it be obtained. In conclusion, my Lord, I make my appeal to your known intelligence, and to your christian candour and urbanity, on this subject. Is there any thing in the principles, or in the proceedings of our denomination, as thus viewed, to render it necessary that there should be this bitter hostility between the Churchman and the Dissenter — this envenomed partizanship, which is everywhere strengthening the scepticism of the Infidel, giving point to the sarcasms of the profligate, perplexing the ingenuous inquirer, and afflicting the heart of the most devout persons in every christian com- munion ? Bear with me, my Lord, in reminding you of the high responsibility which attaches, in this respect, to persons holding a rank like that to which you are raised. If the great are not popu- lar and powerful, it is in general because they do not merit such distinction. Slight favour from them is almost sure to fall with effect on the mass. XX DEDICATION. Moderate effort on the part of your Lordship might do much toward abating the asperities of party, and producing a more christian-Hke habit of mind among those who profess to be ahke Christians. It may be, that this attempt to correct your probable misconceptions with regard to the real object of Dissenters, and to draw your fair-minded attention to their character and history, will be without any apparent effect. It may not appear well to place your opponents in the wrong, by your own dif- ferent example, should they persist in a course of uncharitableness. It may still be our lot to find, that nothing is accounted religion which is not found within the pale of the Established Church ; that nothing is supposed to be done for the ad- vancement of religion, which is not done by that Church ; that the country will be again called upon to augment her exclusive opulence and distinction; that every effort will be made to perpetuate, and not to put away, remaining sources of irritation; in a word, the spirit of the past may survive in the future, and, if so, there will indeed be no prospect of returning concord ; those who sigh most for peace will be constrained to subordinate feeling to principle, and the relative position of DEDICATION. xxi parties, in some unforeseen conjuncture of affairs, may become such as the proudest are little prone to expect. TaJ ovK av fxz ycvos ye kukou koI dvdXKiha (pdures, MvOoi/ aTL/jL'qaTjTe ir€