~**f I PRINCETON, N. J. Collection of Puritan Literature. Division Section Number 5CC \ ~* .,, k Speculum Thealogia in Cbrijlo : '^ fanstmri or, trty A V I E W OF SOME Divine Truths, f Which are either Pra&ically Exemplified JESUS CHRIST, Set forth in the GOSPEL: Or may be reafonably deduced from thence. By EDWARD POLE ILL of Bmwafi in Sujfex, Efq} . LONDON: Printed by A. M. and R. R. for Tho. Cockcri//, at the Three Legs in the Poidtrey, over-againft the Stocks-Market. M DC LXXVIII. O «/ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/thegiOOpolh - -j TO THE CHRISTIAN READER. T was anciently obferved by St Anjliit, touching the Prophets under the Old Tejlament, Non tantum lingua illorum hominnm , verum etiam vita fait Vro- phetica : They did not only prophefie, or reveal the mind of God by words ; but by- things done by or upon them. Ifaiab muft walk naked and barefoot , to (hew the fhame of the Egyptian captivity. Jere- my muft go down to the Potccrs Houfe, and there fee the Veflel marred, to give the Jens a pregnant demonftration , that Cod could unmake and deftroy them. E- %ekiel was to remove and bring forth his ftufF, to give them a lively representation of their captivity. Above all, this was e- minently lcen in our great ProptuT Jefus Chrift ; He did not only reveal the Gofpel, but he himfelf is the lubfiance and mar- * row To the Chrijiian Reader. row of it. He is the very mirror of Di- vine Truths and Perfe&ions. His ftile is the Image of the invifible God, the K *' u * efs of the Fathers Glory. As an eter. jn, he is fiich in himfelf ; As incarnate, he is fuch to us. The Meffiah ( fay the Rab- bins ) is fades Dei, the face of God. The Glory of God ( faith theApoftle) k in the face of Jefus Chriji. The Divine perfe£Hons appear in him, as beauty doth in the face. The invifible one may here be feen ; the inacceflible Majefly may be approached unto. Infinity, to accommodate it felf to our Model, appears nube carnk, in a Cloud of flefli, that his glory might not fwallow us up. In our Emanuel we have a body of Theology, an excellent Summary of Divine Truths , in a very lively manner fet forth to us. The Atheift, who owns not a God in Heaven, might here, if he had eyes of Faith , fee God in the flefli. The Wifdcm of God doth here appear, not in the orders and harmonies of nature; but in a plot much greater, and more ad- mirable: God and Man, infinite and finite, Eternal and Temporal are met in conjun&i- on. To the Chriflian Reader. on, that the human, finite, temporal na- ture in Chrift, might be the Theater for the Div* r ? , Infinite, Eternal nature to (hew \ts t .rfe&ions in. The Truth of God manifefts it felf illuftrioufly , in that no difficulty could hinder the early promife of the Meffiah made immediately after the fall of man ; neither could any time bury it in oblivion. He would be true in that which was the hardeft thing for him to do, in parting with his only begotten out of his bofom for us. After many ages the Pro- mife muft bud and bloilbm, and bring forth the Meffiah. We fee here, That God is the holy one, his hatred of fin is writ in Red Chara&ers, in the blood and wounds of our dear Lord. His love to holinefs was fuch, that he would fend his own Son in the flefli, to recover holinefs into the heart of man again. We have here Providence accurately watching over our Saviour ail- along ; firft over his Genealogy, then over his birth , life , death , refurre&ion : And laftly over the iflue of all ; a Church raifed up to fing Hofannah's to him for ever. O/w- nia plena Sacramentorum^ faith an Ancient ; Every To the Chrijiian Reader. Every thing in Chrift reads as a Le&ure of Divinity, He being the fecond Adam, who brought in righteoufnefs and life unto men; we are fure that there was a firft, who brought in fin and death to them. From his conception, being an extraordinary one, we may plainly gather what the Two ftates of Nature and Grace are } By the common generation we are flefli of fle(h, unclean creatures. By the power of the regenerating fpirit overfhadowing our hearts , we be- come fpirit of fpirit , holy new-creatures. In his life and preaching we have miracles triumphing over nature and all the order of it ; Myfteries exceeding Reafon, and all its Acumen y and a Samplar of humility, Meeknefs , Mercy , Righteoufnefs , Holi- nefs, Obedience, fuch as the Sun never faw. In his death we have, what the proud Socinian thinks impoffible, Infinite Mercy, and Infinite Juftice killing and embracing; each other. Mercy was feen, that God (hould give his only, his dearly beloved Son for us. juflice was feen, that God {hould exaft of him, (landing in our (lead,- as much as would counterpoize the lm and fuf- To the Chrijiian Reader. fering of a World, in his glorious fatisfa- £Hon. We fee what that isj which jufti- fies finners, and makes them ftand before the Holy God. In his excellent example, we fee how juftified ones, which are my- ftical parts and pieces of him., ought to walk and tread in his fteps. Thefe things are the fubjeft matter of the enfuing Dif- courfe ; may all, who are called Chriftians, ftudy Jefus Chrift. The little k'. y 2-, the Reafon of Man, is much cried up in this Age ; may we much more adore the Infinite Word and Wifdom of God. The temper of St. Bernard may be recommended to all, Si fcribas, non japit mi hi, niji legero ibi Je- fum } ft difputes ant confer 'as, non fapit mihi, niji fonuerit ibi Jefus : The devout Father could not relifli any thing but Jefus Chrift -, may our hearts ever burn and be inflamed with love to him, in whom are hid all the treafures of wifdom and knowledg ; may we defire none but Chrift : Non alind prater ilium , non alind tanquam ilium, non alind poji ilium , Nothing befides him, no- thing like him, nothing after him. This a is To the Chrijlian Reader. is the fcope of my Book ; if it profit or do good to any, it is enough, and as much as is defired by him, who is A Lover of Truth, J An. 21. 1677. Edrv. Tolhill: THE THE CONTENTS. CHAP. I. A ftort View of Gods Allfufficiency and condefcenfwnin revealing himfclf p. I, 2. The various ways of ma- nifestation } In the making of the World and Man? p. 3, 4, 5, 6. After the faff, in the Moral Law^ and in types andjliadows, p. 7. Lajlly, and above alt r > in and by Jefus Chrifl, p. 8. CHAP. II. Chrifi considered as a Prophet, and a Speculum, p. 9. The Divine Attributes Jl)ine in him } particularly^ Wifdom,^. 10. The obflacles of Redemption to be removed, p. 1 1, 1 2. The Son of God fit for the xvor^ p. 13. Many admirable conjunctions of God and Man, of Juftice and Mercy, of Puniffjment and Obe- dience inChrifts fufferings, p. 1 4, 1 5. Of Satisfacti- on and a kind of execution of the Law, p. 1 6. Of Sa- tisfaction and Merit, p. 1 7. Of Merit and Exam- ple, p. 1 8. All tending to our falvation, ibid. The rare conquefi of Sin, Satan, the World, Death, p. 19, 20, 21. Humility of mind nee effary, p. 21. The de- fperate iffue of the pride of Human Reafon, p. 2 1,2 2. Need of Humility from the threefold ftate of Rea- fon, in Integrity, after the Fall, after Faith, p. 23, 24,25. (a) 2 CHAR The Contents. CHAP. III. Holinefs the glory of the Deity, p. 26. By it God alls like himfelf and doth all for hk own glory, p. 27. It imports an hatred of (in, and love of holinefs in man, p. 27,28. In all thefe refpeUs it was manifefl in Chrifi, p. 28, 2 9, Sec. It was not indecent for God to come in the flefj and dye, p. 29, 30. The glory of God breaks forth therein, p. 31, 32. His hatred of (in, and defign to extirpate it, p. 3 3, 34, 35. His love to holinefs, in doing fo much to recover it, and link? ing it with falvation, p. 35, 36, 37, 38. We flwuld be followers of God therein, p. 38, 39, &c. CHAP. IV. Gods Punitive Jujlice afferted from Scripture and Na- ture, p. 42, 43, 44. It was necejjary that there flwuld be a Satisfa&ion for (in, p. 45. Reel oral Jujiice re- quired it, p. 46, to 48. TJnlefs Chrifls fufferings were fatkfa&ory, no good account can be given of them, p. 49, 50. It's not enough to fay , That he was an Example of Patience, p. 50. That he confirm- ed the Covenant, p. 51. That Gods immenfe love was manifefled therein, or that his Refurre&ion affu- red ours, ibid. 52, 53. Gods Jujlice appears, in that He, though of i ?i finite Mercy, infilled thofe fufferings on Chrifi, p. 54, 55. In that Chrifi, the Patient, 1 was Man, the Son of God, an holy innocent One, p. 55, to 58. In that the fufferings of Chrifi were proportionable to the (inning-powers in man, p. 59. To the haw, p. 60, 61. To the (in and fuffer- ings of a World , p. 6 1, 62, 63. The fruits of his fufferings as to Himfelf, and as to us, p. 64,65. The dreadfulnejs of (in in refpecf of the fufferings of Chrifi, The Contents. Chriji, and the mijerab/e end of impenitent finners, p. 65, 66, &c. CHAP. V. Gods Lcve and Mercy manifefted, in that he flood not upon the old terms as he might, and in giving his Son for us, p. 70, to 75. The Socinian objection, ( That if God loved us, he was not angry ) anflvercd, p. 76,77,78. The earlinefs and fncncjs of Gods love in giving hk Son, p. yg, 80, 81. The greatnefs of the gift, p. 82. The manner how he was given jp. 83,84, 85. The perfons for whom, p. 85,86, 87. The evils removed, and the good procured by it, p. 87, to 91. The excellent Evangelical terms built upon it, p. 91. Thefe are eafie and fur e, p. 92,93,94. The Love and Mercy of God an excellent Motive to fir up our love towards God and man, p. 95, 96^ 97, Sec. CHAP. vr. The Power of God manifcf in Chriji, p. 99, 100. In hk incarnation and conception,^, ioo, 10 1, 102. In hk Miracles, p. 103, 104. Thefe were true in the Hijiory, p. 1 04, 105,106. True in the nature of Mi- racles, p. 107. They were numerous and great, 108, 109, 1 10. They were fuited to the Evangelical De- (ign, p. 1 1 1, 1 12. Divine Power manifeft in con- verting the World, notwithstanding its deep corrup- tion, and the opposition of Potentates and Philofo- phers to the Gojpel^ p. 1 13, to 124. The infruments* mean, that the power might be of God, p. 124, 125. The Gofpel propofes fuper-rational Myfieries, fuper- meral Virtues , fuper-mundane rewards^ things fo much above us, that without a Divine power the pro- pofal would have been fruitlefs, p. 126, 127. CHAP. VII. The Truth of God manifefled in Chnfi, p. 1 3 3, 1 34. The Pro- ■•*■■ The Contents, Promije of the Mejfiah, p. 134. The Mejfiah is al- ready come, ibid. 155. Jefis is the true Mejfiah, p. 1 3 6, 1 3 7, 1 3 8. All the other promt fes are built upon him, 138, 139. The truth of the Moral Law evi- denced in him, 139. The Mandatory part proved by his atJive Obedience $ The Minatory by his Suffer- ings, p. 139, 14c, 141. He is the fubjlance of the Types and Sacrifices, p. 1 42, 143, 144. Somewhat in him anfwers to them, p. 144, 145. And fomewhai in him infinitely tranfeends them, p. 146, to 1 49. The truth of Worffjip jet forth in him, p. 1 50. Tie unclog- ged it from Rituals, opened the fpiritual mode of it, communicates Grace for it, reveals the great Reward of Eternal Life, p. 15c, 151,152. CHAP. VIII. Gods Providence afferted from Scripture, Philofophy, and Reafon, 156, 157, 1 58. It hath a double ail, Confervative and Ordinative, p. 1 5 9, T 60, 1 6 1 . Both are manifejied in Chrijl, p. 162. It was over Chrijl, ever his Genealogy, Birth, Life, Death, p. 162, 163, 164. Over the fruit of his Satisfaction, in raiting up a Church, p. 165. It aimed at a Church, directed the means, and added the blejjing, p. 166, 167. That opinion, That Chrijl might have dyed, and yet there might have been.no Church, is falfe, p. 168,169,170. All other Providences reduced to thofe over Chrijl and the Church, p. 171, to 176. Epicurus's Obje- 3 ion again fl Providence answered, p. 176,177,178. Providence over free a&s of men afferted, and yet Li- berty not dejlroyed, p. 178, to 1 8 6. The oljcSions touching the affiiUions of good men, and the event of fin, jolvcd, p. 1 86, to 1 92 The Entity in finful ani- ons dijlincJ from the Anomy, the Order from the A- taxy,p. 192, I93 ? &c. CHAP. The Contents. CHAP. IX. The Do&rine of Original (in,the great moment of it^ p. 202, to "205. Adam'/ fin imputed to us, p.2c^ The proof of it from Scripture, p. 207, to 209. Ada 1/ capacity, p. 2 I o. Adam\r righteoufnejs, ibid. Obje- ctions anjwered, p. 2 1 1, to 2 1 5. Our inherent pra- vity, p. 2 1 6. The proof of it from Scr/pture.v. 217, 218. The experience of our hearts, p.2r^ to 221. The atlual fins in the world, p. 222, 225. The do- Brine of Original Jin manifefied from Chrjjls ex- traordinary Conception, p. 224, 225. His Hcadflup oppofed to Adam /, p. 226, from the infiitutiOn of Baptifm,p. 22 J. The wickednefs of the Jews in cru- cifying of Chriji, p. 228, 229. The furchafe of Re- generation and Salvation made by Chriji, p. 230, to 234. A foort improvement of this Do&rine, p.2J5, 236, &c. CHAP. Xv Touching Grace, p. 239. The fountain of it Gods love^ ib. 240. The jireams fuper natural gifts, p. 240,241. The center Heaven, p. 242. Its freenefs, in that all perijh not in the fall 5 Original fin meriting death, and Chriji being a free gift, p. 242, to 248. Its free- nefs in chujing a Church to God, p. 248. Eleclion not of all, p. 249. No Legiflative ac7, but a tingling out of fome to life in an infallible way, and m erly of Grace, 250^0 2^. Its freenefs in the external and in- ternal Ctf//,p.2 59,to 262. The diflin&ion between the twoCalls, 263,to 269. The efficacy of Grace as to the Principles of Faith and other graces^ with ^ l man- ner of their production, p. 269, to 276. As ic actual believing and willing^ with the proofs of .>•, 276, to 285. As to per fever an ce in faith and holmefs, 0.285, 286. The Habits of Grace defeUible in themjeh s, but not in their dependence, p. 287, to 295. * CHAP. The Contents. CHAP. XI. Touching Jufiification as to the Law, p. 325, to 327. Chrifls Righteoufnefs conflitutes m righteous, p. 3 2 8. A double imputation : One to the proper Agent, ano- ther to thofe in conjunction, p. 329, 330. The con- junctions between Chrijl and us, p. 3 3 r, to 3 34. How drifts R7ghteoufnefs k imputed to us, p. ?35,to 337. That it k not only the Meritorious, but Material caufe of our purification, 338. This k proved from that phrafe, The Righteoufnefs of God, ib. 339, 340. From the nature ofjujiification,ip^^i,to 343. From the parallel of the two Adams, 344^0351. From ether phrafes in Scripture, 3 5 1, to 3 5 7. From a par- don as not being the fame with Jujiijication, 3 5 7, to 364. From Chrifls fuffering in our flead, 364,365. The Objections againjl imputed Righteoufnefs anfwer- ed, 365, to 374. What jufti fie s us as to the Gojpel- terms, 374, &c. The necefjity and connexion of a two- fold Righteoufnefs, 37^0381. Flow we arejujlified by Faith, 381, 382. Flow Good works are ncceffary, 382^0387. Aflwrt conclusion, 387, 388, Sec. C H A P.' XII. Touching an Holy Life, 390, to 392. It is not from prin- ciples of Nature, 393, 394. It is the fruit of a renew- ed, regenerated heart, 395, to 401. It iffues out of faith and love, 401, to 407. It proceeds out of a pure intention towards the will and glory of God, 407, to. 414. It k humble, and dependent upon the inji;:ences of Grace, 414, to 421. It requires a (in cere mortifi- cation of fin, without any Jalvo or exception, 421, to 427. It flan ds in an exercife of all Graces, 427,428. It makes a man holy in ordinances, alms, projperity, adzerfity, contracts, calling, 428, to 441. There is J uch an exercije of graces as caufcth them to grow^\l, to 447. The conclufion of the Chapter, 447,to 449.- Chap, r, A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A. ¥ •§ # § 1 § %• § § * • $ *' ▼ * * w •*' $ v * * f * ^ CHAP. L AJJjort View of Gods All-fufjiciency and condefcenfion in revealing himfelf The various ways ofManifeJiation, In the making of the World and Man^ After the fall \ in the moral Law 5 and in types and flmdows : Lajily and above all, in and by Jeffs Chriji. OD All-fufficient muft needs be his own happinefi 5 he hath his Be- ing from himfelf, and his happi- nefs isno other than his being ra- diant with all Excellencies, and by intelle&ual and amatorious refle- S?fW^ xions, turning back into the frui- tion of it (elf. His Underftanding hath profpeft enough in his own infinite Perfecti- ons : his Will hath reft enough in his own infinite Goodne'fs 5 he needed not the pleafure of a World, who hath an eternal Son in his bofom to joy in 5 nor the breath of Angels or men , who hath an eternal Spirit of his own : he is the Great All, comprizing all within himfelf: nay , unlefs he were fo, he could not be God. Had he let out no beams of his glory, or made no intelligent creatures to gather up and re- turn them back to himfelf, his happinefs would have fufFered no eclipfe or diminution at all: his Power would have been the lame, if it had folded up all B the Gods various ways Chap. i. the poffible Worlds within its own arms, and poured forth never an one into being to be a monument of it felf. His Wifdom the fame, if it had kept in all the orders and infinite harmonies lying in its bofbm, and fet forth no fach feries and curious contexture of things as now are before our eyes. His Goodnefs might have kept an eternal Sabbath in it (elf, and ne- ver have come forth in thofe drops and models of Be- ing which make up the Creation. His Eternity flood not in need of any fach thing as time or a fucceflion of inftants to meafure its duration } nor his Immenfi- ty of any fuch Temple as Heaven and Earth to dwell in, and fill with his pretence. His Holinefs wanted not iuch pictures of it felf as are in Laws or Saints 5 nor his Grace fuch a channel to run in as Covenants or Promifes. His Majefty would have made no abate- ment, if it had had no train or hoft of creatures to wait upon it, or no rational ones among them, fuch as An- gels and men, to found forth its prailes in the upper or lower World. Creature-praifes , though in the highcft tune of Angels, are but as filence to him, as that Text may be read, Ffalm 65. 1. Were he to be ferved according to his Greatnefs, all the men in the World would not be enough to make a Prieft , nor all the other creatures enough to make a Sacrifice fit for him ^ Is it u??y pie afire to him that thou art righ- teous, faith Eliphaz , Job 22.5? No doubt he takes pleafure in our rightcoufhefs, but the complacence is without indigence 5 and while he likes it, he wants it not. That fuch an infinite All-fufficient One fhould mani- feft himfelf,mufi: needs be an aft of admirable fupercftlu- ent Goodneft^fuch as indeed could not be done without .(tapping down below his own Infinity, that he might gratifie of revealing himfelf. 3 gratifie our weakness. Thofe two Hebrew words, Chap, t, *, which imports fleCh or weakneis , and t©! , which is to annunciate and declare good tidings, are of a necr affinity. In the myfterre of the Incarna- tion God came down into our flefh 3 and in every o- ther manifestation of himfelf, he comes down, as it were, into the weakneis of creatures or notions, that we, who cannot hear or underftand the eternal Word in it (elf, or enter the Light inacceffible, might fee him in reflexes and finite glaiTes, fuch as we are able to bear. Every manifestation imports conde- fcenfion. The World, as fair and goodly a ftrufture as it is, is but inftar punffi ant tiihih, like a little drop or (mall duft to him. Creaturc-reafon, though a di- vine particle, and more glorious than the Sun it (elf, is but a little fpark for the Infinite Light to (hew him- felf in. No words, no not thofe in the pure(fc Laws and richefc Promifes, are able to reach him 5 who, as an Ancient hath it , is •tepwio^ -&r&iyet$o; , -faipjcM , Eflencc,Goodne(s, Wifdom,all in hyperbole 5 in a tran- feendent excefi above words or notions. His Name is above every name 5 neverthelefi, he humbles him- felf to appear to our minds in a Scripture-image 5 nay, to our very fenfes in the body of Nature , that we might clafp the arms of Faith and Love about the holy beams, and in their light and warmth afcend up to their great Original , the Father of Lights and Mercies. God hath manifefted himfelf many ffeys. He fet up the material World , that he, though an invifible Spirit, might render himfelf vifible therein : all the hofts of Creatures wear his colours. Senfible things ( fay the Platonifts ) are but the types and refemblan- ces of fpiritual, which are the primitive and arche- 1 B 2 typal Gods various ways Chap. i. typal Beings. Every thing here below ( (ay the Jervifi Cabalifts ) hath fome root above, and all Worlds have the print and feal of God upon therrv Eternity (hadows forth it (elfin time 5 infinite Power, Wifdom, andGoodne(s,pourtray outthemfelves upon finite things in fuch legible chara&ers, that, as (bon as we open our eyes upon them, we fee innumerable crea- tures pointing to the Creator, and teaching that Wif- dom, which Archytas the Philofopher placed in the reduftion of all things to one great Original. Al- mighty Power hath printed it felf upon the World, nay, upon every little particle of it : all the crea- tures came out of nothing, and between that and Being is a very vafi: gulf. It was an infinite Power, which filled it up and fetched over the creatures in- to Being 5 it was a$ Almighty Word , which made the creatures at an infinite diftance hear and rife up out of nothing. The old Axiom, Ex mhilo nihil fit , is Natures limit and a true meafure of finite powers 5 but when, as in the Creation, Nature overflows the banks, when Nullity it (elf fprings up and runs over into a World, we are fure, that the moving Power was an Infinite one. And as infinite. Power appears in the being of the creatures, (b doth infinite Wif- dom in their orders and harmonies. The curious I- dea's and Congruities, which before were latent in the divine breaPr, are limned out upon outward and fenfible things , {landing in delicate order and pro- portion before our eyes. The World is a Syftem of contraries made up into one body, in which di(agree- ing natures confpire together for the common good: each creature keeps its ftation , and all the parts of Nature hang one upon another in a fweet confede- racy. Meer natural Agents operate towards their ends, of revealing himfelf. 5 ends, as if they were Matters of Reafon, and hit their Chap, 1 proper mark, as if they had a providence within them. Such things as thefe teach us to conclude with Zeno, that aS>©-, Reafon, is the Great Artift which made all ; and to break out with the Pfalmift, Lord ! how manifold arc thy works why haft thou forfaken me. His Sufferings were very penal in themfelves, and infli&ed by Ju- ftice, yet freely undertaken, and obedientially under- gone. Here therefore was an admirable work of Wifdom 5 his Sufferings as penal fat isfied Juft ice, and as obediential gratified Holinels. 4. The Truth of God was concerned in that firft Threatning, Thoufloalt fnrely die } and in that other, which is a kind of Commentary upon it, Curfedi? he that continueth not in all things. Thefe Threat- nings, which were the fanftion of that eternal Law, touching which our Saviour affures us^ that one jot or tittle of it (hall not pafs away , are not to be confounded with thofe conditional Threatnings which are extant in Scripture , and were by God ufed to induce men unto repentance. Now that Truth might be (alved, there was in Chrifts Sufferings a conjun- ftion of a Satisfa&ion , and a kind of execution of the Law. Indeed, an execution of it in the rigour or ftrift letter of it there was not , neither could that be but upon the Sinner himfelf 5 yet there was a kind of execution of it in an equitable fenfe in our Sponfor Jefus Chrift : his Satisfo&ion, though it was not the idem, the very fame which the letter of the Law called for 5 yet in infinite Wifdom it was acconv- in the Redemption cf Man. 1 7 accommodated to the terms of the Law , as far as Chap. 2. the decorum of his Sacred Perfon could admit of 5 K^ m >r m ^f in the threatning there was Death and a Curfe, and both thefe were in the fufferings of Chrift : hence the Apoftle faith, That fin was fo condemned in his flefh, that the righteoufnefs of the Law was fulfil- led, Rom. 8. 3,4. It was in a fort executed in our Surety , that in the dime fufferings there might be a fatisfa&ion to Juftice , and a compliance with Truth. He that confidcrs thefe Conjunctions will have caufc to cry out with the Pfalmift , Mercy and truth are met together, righteoufnefs and peace have kif fed each other, Pfalm 85. 10. 5. That poor lapfed man with his blind eyes and hard heart, utterly uncapable in himfelf of Heaven, may be made meet for it 5 there was in Chrifts fuf- ferings a conjunction of Satisfa&ion and Merit 5 Ju- ftice was compenfated, and Grace impetrated. Indeed the Socimans , blind with their own corrupt reafbn, cannot fee how thefe two ftiould ftand together, Satisfaftion being the pay- ubl tfi- fatisfifti; M non $ ment of a juftdebt, and Merit the SffS g?f£4*2 doing of an undue work. To which opus indtbitum. Soc. I anfwer : It is true , that when one pays a finite fum for his own debt, there is not , there cannot be a merit in it 5 but when Jefus Chrift paid down fufferings of an infinite value for us, there cannot but be an immenfe merit in them. Infinity is an Ocean, and may run over in effefts as far as it pleafes, thofe fufferings had a kind of Infinity in them , enough to pay divine Juftice , and over and above •by a redundance of merit to purchafe all grace for us. Hence the Apoftle faith , Thai the Holy Ghoft is f/jedon us abundantly through Jefus Chrift , Tit. 3. 6. D Chrift 1 8 The Wifdom of God Chrift afcended up to Heaven in the glory of his Merits, and from thence poured down the Holy Spi- rit On men , that their blind eyes might be opened upon the myfteries of the Gofpel, and their hard hearts might be melted into repentance. Thus a fair way is opened to make fal'n man capable of E- ternal Life. 6. Becaufe the inward vital principles of Grace in men muft needs flourifh moft, when there is an out- ward excellent pattern of Holinefs fet before them 5 there was therefore in Chrifts fufFerings a conjun&i- on of Merit and Example : the Merit procured the principles of Grace, and the Example by its divine beauty drew them out into imitation. vix fen pojft videm, ut Socinus thinks,that a Satisfaction and an & fimui txtrnpium rtihqnatur, Example can very hardly meet together Socin. Prael. cap. 20. in the fame thing 5 the like fcruple may be made touching Merit and Ex- ample % and the very truth is, Satisfaction and Merit are a Cup which we cannot drink of, a Sea in which we cannot trace or follow our Saviour. Neverthe- lefs, infinite Wifdom laid one plot under another 3 and under inimitable Satisfaction and Merit, couch'd an incomparable pattern of Holinefi for us. We may clearly fee in him, how we are to mortifie cor- ruptions, bear afflictions, learn obedience by (uffer- ings, and obey unto the death. In thefe he hath left us an Example, that we might follow his fteps, I Pet. 2. 21. Having (een the contrivance in thefe rare Con- junctions , let us now confider how the Divine Wifdom fet Ambuthments for our fpiritual Ene- mies : I mean, Sin, Satan, the World, and Death 5 all which are in a very admirable manner over- come in the Redemption of Man. ip come by Jefus Chrift. Sin, which meritorioufly was the bloody crucifier of the Son of God,was crucified toge- ther with him when he differed 5 it was in his flelh condemned as an accurfed thing worthy to die 3 no fooner are we in him by Faith , but it lofes its kingdom, and by a divine Virtue from his Crofs, it droops and languishes away in us. Satan the arch-enemy, at Chrifts death feemed to be a Conqueror 5 that God Incarnate (hould be (lain by his hellifh Inftruments, that the whole Church (hould die in its Head, looks like a mighty Viftory : when the Head (hall die, what (hall the Members do? when the Sun, the great Globe of Light in the fpi- ritual World, (hall be turned into bloody what fhould remain but that darknefs , which Satan hath the power of? Upon the death of the Duke of Guife, Henry the Third broke out thus, Nunc demum Rex fitm. Now at la(t I am King. Upon the death of our Saviour , Satan might fuppofe himfelf abfolute Prince in the lower World $ a greater Adam than the firft being fallen , no man can probably ftand before him. But here infinite Wifdom (hews forth it fclf. Satan is taken in his own fnare$ by that very death of Chrift, which was procured by his own Agents , is he utterly overthrown. Chrift upon the Crofs did fpoil Principalities and Powers , and triumph over them in it, Col. 2.15. The fatisfa&ion in his (ufferings, paid off divine Juftice, and the Merit in them pro- cured that divine Spirit, which is able to bind and caft out Satan from the hearts of men. The Crofs was now turned into a triumphant Chariot : and, as an Ancient hath it, there were two affixed to it % Chrift mo in cnti affixl [ant y Cbri(lHs vifibiliur, fponte ad ttmpus, dUbolus hvlfibiliur^ invitus in perpetwm. Orig. D 2 vifibly ao The Wifdom of God Chap. 2. vifibly, freely, for a time 5 the Devil invifibly, co- a&ively, for ever : that Crofs was a final Vi&ory over him. He was overcome not by a man only, but by a man fuffering, bleeding, dying upon a Cro% the- Lord reigneth &n gfa*, from the Crofs ( as fbme of the Ancients read that 10th verfe in the 96 Pfalm ), through death he deflroyed him that had the power of death,that is, the devil, Heb. 2. 14. The Devil wasde- ftroyed by Death his own weapon , and overcome in that which he had the power of. The wicked World at the death of Chrift triumph-* ed and infulted even to blafphemy, He faved others^ himfelf he cannot fave, Matth. 27. 42 5 as if all his miraculous power were now fwallowed up in weak^ nefs } Let him come down from the Crofs , and we will believe him, Matth. 27. 42 5 as if without a frefh Mi- racle all his holy Do&rines would vanifh into no- thing. The Jews, who were for Signs, (tumbled and. fell in the midft of thofe glorious Miracles which> he wrought among them. The Greeks* v/ho were for Wifdom, (aw nothing but foolifhnefs in the midffe of the divine Myfterics , which he brought down out of his Fathers Bofom. A crucified Chrift look'd like a fpeftacle of weaknefs and folly. But here the* divine Wifdom appears, in, that, as the Apoftle hath; It, The fooliflmefs of God is wifer than men , and the weaknefs of God fironger than men. This crucified Chrift (hall attraft a Church out of the corrupt? Mafs of mankind 5 the foolifhnefs of Preaching fhalL do it. The Plato s or Ariftotks of the World (hall not be employed in the work 5 , no* there fhall be only Pifcatoria (implicit as , a few Fifhermen fhall catch men, and draw' them home unto God 5 to the effe- ctually called, this defpifed Chrift (hall-be the* power and in the Redemption of Man. 2 1 and wifdomofGocl. ThedivineSpirit,meritedbyhim, Chap. (hall endue them with a wifdom much higher than that of Nature and Philofophy, and cloathe them with a power to make them live above all the hopes and fears of this World. Death, the laft Enemy, which had devoured fo much humane flefh , did not (pare that Sacred por- tion, which was affumed into the Son of God : but in his death, Death it (elf was fwallowed up in Vi- ctory. It pafles indeed upon all men 5 but when it comes to a Believer, it lays by its fting, and becomes only a paffage into life Eternal. To conclude: In all thefe Conquefts, we' may fee one Contrary brought out of another : Life out of Death, Power out ofWeaknefs, a Bleffing out of a Curfe, and a Viftory out of Sufferings, which (peaks no left than an admirable contrivance therein. The(e appearances of Divine Wifdom naturally teach us humility of mind. Humane Reafon is in- deed in its own Orb an excellent Lights but a grea* ter than it , the Reafon of Cod hirn(elf, comes forth to us in fupernatural Myfteries, to make us (it down at his feet for Inftruftion. Nothing can be more juft and purely rational, than for our Intellect being finite, to be fubjeft to the infinite Truth 5 and being !ighted up by God,to do homage to its great Original. It's truc,e ver fince man tafted of the Tree of Know- ledg, his Reafon hath had a malignant pride in it : of a Minifter it would be a Lord over our Faith 5 a(- fuming the Magifterial Chair, it would fill adjudg- ing Divine Myfteries 3 it would comprehensively fpan them within it (elf: and what could not be (b com- prized, it would out of enmity caft away as fpuri- ous. This in the iffue hath, (b far as it hath prevail- 1 2 The Wifdom of God Chap. 7. ed, defperately overturned all Faith , in the adt and w**"~v~nj in the object : in the ad, for to believe a thing, be- caufe I can comprehend it, is not faith in God , but trufting in my own heart 5 not a fealing to his Vera- city, but a fubfcribing to my own Sagacity. Hence the learned Marefitts faith of the Socinians^ That they have mamts ohtlaHs^ hands with eyes in them 5 that only do they believe which they fee 5 they will truft God no further than they fee him. Alfo in the Ob- ject 5 this hath been very fubverfive to the Gofpel. In the Pagan Philofophers ( w 7 hofe Motto was , Soli rationi cedo ), it caft away Chrift crucified as foolifli- nefs, and the Gofpel as an abfurd Fable 5 it reflected on Chriftians as meer Simpletons, men of an eafie and irrational faith } hence that jeer of Cato Stultitia eft morte alter his fperare falutem 5 it's folly to hope for ialvation in the death of another. In the Socinians^ ( whofe Rule is, Nihil credi pot eft ^ quod a rati one ne- queat ctif% nothing can be believed, which cannot be comprehended by Reafbn )$ it hath blown up the fundamental Articles of Chriftianity : the facred Tri- nity to them is a contradiction 5 the Hypoftatical Uni- on an irrational repugnancy, the Satisfaction of Chrift a contumely to Gods grace : and in all this they do but build a Tower, a Name to their own Reafon 5 and, as a juft punifhment, in the doing of it they fall into confufion and inconfiftencies. Sometimes they Miu Hydra: make the Law to exatt a more perfect obedience than om. 2. 4 o. t ^ e Q fp e j . Sometimes the Gofpel to call for a more accurate righteoufnefs than the Law. To evert Satis- faction, they lift up Grace 5 but to elevate Free-will, they deprefs it. They own a God , yet deny his Pre- ference 5 they fay Chrift is but a creature , yet they worfhip him. Thus that great thing, Reafon, falling from in the Redemption of Man. 2 3 from the fuprcme Truth, becomes a forlorn fpe&acle Chap. 2, of vanity. In a kind of fclf-fplendor it goes out in the darkncfs oferrour and confufion. But now to humble our minds, it is of excellent uie to confider the divine VVifdom, which is lb much above us. When our Reafbn ftands by ienfe , it hath a noble ftature and greatnefs} but, as foon as it turns about to infi- nite Wifdom , it perceives a greater Prefence than it (elf, and muft in all reafon confefs it felf a little (park, a very Nothing in companion. It cannot ftep out into the fphere of Nature, but it finds matter of hu- mility } being true to it felf , it can do no lefs than (ay, that it is everywhere po(ed and nonpluft. It is not able rationally to ftand under the fecrets of Na- ture, much more muft it ftoop and do reverence be- fore fuch a Myftery as that is, God mamfeji in the flejl) 3 in which the tranlcendent Myftery amazes us, and the unparallel'd Pattern draws us into humility. Thither muft we come, or el(e turn Infidels, and allow Reafon for a Deity 5 (aying with Seneca, g>jad aliud voces animam , quam Deum in hnmano corf ore hofpi- tantem ? What is the rational Soul but God dwelling in flefh, a kind of Chrift D or rather Antichrift? This, I am fure Chriftian ears cannot bear. But a little more to d^monftrate how neceflary a thing humility of mind is 5 let us confider Reafon in a three-fold ftate : then it will appear, that Reafon in its Integri- ty could not find out fupernatural Myfteries$ in its Fall cannot Spiritually know them } and laftly, in the irradiations of Faith cannot comprehend them. 1. Reafon in its Integrity could not find them out. The pure primitive light in Adam could dive into the fecrets of Nature, but it could not reach fuch a Myfterie as that of the facred Trinity, which is the fun-- 2 a. The Wifdom of God Chap.2 . fundamental center of Chriftian Pveligion. He could name the creatures, and that fignificantly to their na- tures, but that Queftion, What tshisfons name, Pr.ov. 30. 4 , would have been too hard for him. There are, fay the School-men, fome obfeure Images of the Trinity in the Volume of Nature , but they were found out a pojieriori , and not to be read till after Revelation 5 and how fhould humane Reafon di&ate in thofe things which it could not find out? or know any thing from it felf , when it hath all from Reve- lation ? Nothing can be more abfurd than fuch a prefumption. 2. Reafon in its Fall could not fpiritually know them. Evangelical Myfteries being propofed , it can go as fir as its own line, unto letters, and words, and ientences: it can gather in a Notion, a form of knowledg, but it wants a congruous light 5 it can- not fpiritually difcern them, there being no alliance or resemblance between an unregenerate mind and fu- pernatural Myfteries. Were it not thus, the new crea- ture would be new only ex. parte, there would need no renovation in the fpirit of the mind 5 God, who propofes the Objeft, need not (hine into the heart 5 the Spirit of Wifdom which reveals the Gofpel, need not open the eyes. We muft either affirm fuch things as thefe, or elfe confefs that Reafon of it felf hath not light enough to be Umpire in fupernatural My- fteries. It doth not fpiritually difcern them, and for that caule cannot be an Umpire 5 and, as fbon as by fupernatural Illumination it difcerns them, it will not, dares not be fuch, but with all reverence acquiefces and repofes it felf in the divine Teftimony: Deus dix- it then is enough. 3. Reafon in the Redemption of Man. 25 3. Reafon in the irradiations of Faith cannot com- Chap, prehend them : a difcerning there is, but no com- prehenfion s let the Believer (ail as far as he can in the purfutt of holy Truths, ftill there will be a Plus ultra, an Abyfs, a vaft Ocean, fuch as the hu- mane underftanding can never pafs through. Faith feals to Gods Veracity, but it offers not to mea- iure theMyterie 5 it believes the thing fo to be, but it pryes not into the Modus, nor faith, How can thefe things be ? that is the voice of depraved Reafon, not of Faith, whoie excellent genius is to crucifie Hows and Whys, and to fubjeft the mind to the Word and Authority of God. Thefe things being fo , we (hould be all over cloathed with Humility, Underftanding and all. The higher the faculty is, the more excellent is the Hu- mility } then is God honoured indeed , when *£v rtH<*4, all the hitelled, the higheft thing in man, is fubje&ed unto Him. CHAP j6_ Chap. 3, CHAR III. Holinefs the glory of the Deity: By it God aUs like himfelf, and doth all for his own Glory. It im- ports an hatred of fin, and love of Holinefs in man. In all thefe rejpeffs it was manifefi in Chriji. It was not indecent for God to come in the flejh and die^ the Glory of God breaks forth therein. His hatred of fin, and defign to extirpate it } His love to Holinefs , in doing fo much to recover it, and linking it with Salvation. We fiould be fol* lowers of God therein. HAVING feen the Attribute of WifiJom in God , I proceed to that of Holinefs, which is the glory of the Deity. He is called the Holy One above thirty times in Scripture : the Seraphims in an Extafie cry out Holy, Holy, Holy 5 denoting by that repetition the fuperlative Eminency of his Holi- nefs. This is an univerfal Attribute , which runs through all the other. Hence we find in Scripture that His Power or Arm is Holy, Ifi.52.10. His Truth or Promife Holy, Pfilm 105. 42. His Mercy Holy, Acts 13. 34. A vein of Purity runs through His whole Name. Without Holinefs his Wifdom would be Subtilty, His Juftice Cruelty, His Soveraignty Tyranny, His Mercy foolifh Pity 5 all would degene- rate into fomething unworthy of God. Holinefs is the infinite Purity and Re&itude of his Effence 5 and it may be confidered either refpe&ively to him- felf, or to the creature. Refpe&ively to himfelf it includes two things : 1. That the Holinefs of God^ &c. 27 1. That God, in all that he doth, afts like him- Chap. 3. felf, in a juft decorum to his excellent Being and ^— v^^> Attributes, having no Law without or above him- felf He conforms to his EiTence, and carries him- felf lo fitly to himfelf, that no fpot , no darknefs, no fhadow of turning, no indecency or irregula- rity can poflibly happen to him. He cannot deny himfelf, or do any thing unworthy of his Being or Attributes. He doth whatever he doth, in fuch a manner as becomes Him. Hence Anfelm obferves, That when Cod fpares and is merciful towards fin- M^ esfe* ners, he is juft to Himfelf, and that becaufe he ads^-f^^r condecently to his infinite Goodnefs. This is the cmdumnos. firft and prime part of his Holinefs, to be juft and profo1, cap * true to Himfelf, to do all congruoufly to his own Excellency. 2. That God doth all things for Himfelf, his own Glory. He that is Alpha, the firft Principle of all things, muft of neceflity be Omega, the laft End of them : his Sanftity requires , that all his works fhould return and give glory to their Original } he fhould not be true or juft to Himfelf, if he fhould have any Center befides himfelf 5 his Holinefs is a Tranfcendent above that in Man. Supreme Self-love, which in man is a Belial thing, is a Perfe&ion in Him: To do all for one's felf, which in man is Ido- latry, it is true Sanftity in Him. It is moft proper for him, the fupreme Caufe and EiTence , to make all things for Himfelf 3 as of and through him, fb to him are all things. Again, Gods Holinefs taken refpeftively to the Creature, imports two things : 1. It imports an hatred of fin: His pure Eyes can- E 2 aot 28 T&e Holinefs of God ^ — i Chap. 3. not look upon it with approbation 3 His righte- ous hands will not let it go unpunifhed, Sin is a very vile thing, it defpifes Gods Authority , cafts off his Soveraignty , contradicts his Purity, pro- vokes his Tuftice 5 nay, it ftrikes at his very Being: it fays, Who is Lord, that he (hould be obeyed ? It is the moft prodigious Rebel that ever was 3 weak- nefs , folly, corruption rifing up in arms againfc Power, Wifdom, and infinite Perfe&ioij. The Holy One, becaufehe is fuch, muft needs hate fuch a filthy abominable thing : He can no more ceafe to hate it, than he can ceaie to be Holy. His antipathy againft it is fb great, that he can no more admit one drop of it into himfelf , than he can fuffer an extincti- on of his Effence. a. It imports a love of Holinefs in the creature. Holinefs is a very choice thing $ 'tis a pure breath from God , a participation of the Divine Nature : an Image or refemblance of the Deity 5 more of the beauty and glory of God fhines forth in it, than in ajl the world befides. The other creatures are but a dark fhadow to it § nay, it is a thoufand times more divine than the Soul it felf. The Holy One, who loves himfelf, muft needs love fb excellent a Picture of his own San&ity. The righteous Lord loveth right coufaefs , Pfalm 1 1. 7 } becaufe he is righteous in himfelf , therefore he loves righteoufnefs in the creature. Such, as I faid, is Gods Holinefs 5 Thedifplay of it in Jefus Chrift fucceeds. 1. The firft part of his Holinefs , by which he does all in a juft decorum to his excellent Being,- f^ems to be contradicted in this Difpenfation. May God in the Manifeftation ofChrijt. 29 God be made flefh ? May Majcfty be humbled ? Chap. 3. May the immutable One be changed in an Incarna- tion ? May the immortal One die in a bloudy Paffion ? Thefe things at the firft blirfh look as if they could not be congruoufly done. But I an- fwer, The corrupt Reafon of Man , which would fhape all things according to its own model and Idea, hath, under colour of avoiding indecen- cies and inconveniencies, made very ftrange work about this Myfterie. In the Pagan Sophr , it look- ed upon a crucified God as meer folly and inde- cency. In the unbelieving Jews it reproached Chrift as a Talui , a poor hanged man , altogether inca- pable to be a Meffiah or Saviour. In the Hereticks of the Church, it tore and mangled his facred Per- (on all to pieces , and that under pretence of avoiding one inconvenience or other. Arius , that he might not fall into that Gentile- vanity, a plu- rality of Gods , took away Chrifts Deity. dpolli~ varis fpared his Deity, but took away his humane Soul 5 the room of that being better fupplied by the Deity. Saturninus and Bafilides took away his body, leaving only a Phantafm, a meer Umbra in the room of it : or if there muft be a real Body, Apelles thought fit that it ffyould be a Sydereal one, which in his paflage from Heaven he affumed, and after his Refurre&ion reftored again. Nefto- ^oiigioniru Tins, left the impaffible Deity fhould fuffer, would i^\p°L have two Chrifts 3 one the Son of man who fu£ •** So Mjfo. fered, another the Son of God, who dwelt in the ridS ' other as in his Temple. Eutychcs, fuppofing that there could not be two Natures in Chrift, without two Perfons, thought it convenient, that after the Union ao 7 he Holinefs of God -Chap. 3. Union there (hoivld be but one Nature in Chrift 3 c*-~vr"^ the humane Nature being fwallowed up in the Di- vine. And the reafbn of all this is, becaufe, as an PpYmtam'ca- Ancient hath it touching the Eutychians , they look dunt, qui, cum not ft> much to the Sacred Scriptures, as to them- dim C °wtiltm * e ' ves > being willing that their own Reafon (hould aU quo imtdi- be Umpire in facred Myfteries } they become Ma- untur rifcuro, fters of Errour , who would not be Difciples of T^J voces! non Truth. By this heap of Experiments we may plain- ed Afofloiicas ly fee, that the decorum of this Myfterie is too great l zZ S g)iicZ a a . thin g to be judged by humane Reafon : if we authorities, will know any thing of it, we muft addrefs our ffnJnnt*' ^ ves to l ^ e divine Oracle, Jefus Chrift, the infinite idel mgifiri increated Wifdom of God , who never had fo much emris exjflunt, as an indecorous thought, delighted in the fens of ^IjcipuTiTon w-> Prov. 8. 31. in the prolpett of a future Incar- . fuere. Leo pri- nation. It was ro vpno*, a thing becoming him, to mus,Epift.io.y^ z aU rigbteouffiefi , Matt h. 3. 153 when yet it could not have become him in an unbecoming Na- ture. There was a a«, a trnift, upon his Death and Sufferings, Matth. 16. 215 when yet it was utter- ly impoffible, that any neceffity fhould prefs him into an indecency. There was therefore an excel- lent congruity in this Myfterie. Cod indeed was made flefh, but how ) Non mutando quod erat^ fed ajjumendo quod von crat, not by changing his Deity, but by affuming his Humanity. Majefty was hum- bled, not in it felf, but in the affumed fleth, which was as a Veil over all the Glory. The change and death was not in the Divine, but Humane nature, which was taken into his Sacred Perfbn in the In- carnation, and fuffered death in his Paffion upon the Croft. There was a juft decorum in all : Nay, in in the Manifejiation ofChriJi. g 1 in this very Myfterie, at which humane Reafon cries Chap. 5, out of indecency , God hath hid fuch an Abyfs of Wifdom, as no created Underftanding is able to fa- thom 5 a glimpfe of which appears in the next par- ticular. 2. That part of Holineft, by which God doth all things for himfelf, for his own Glory, eminently appears in Jefus Chrift. In general it appears, that God is the great Cen- ter , the ultimate end of all 5 and all creatures, none excepted, are as fo many Lines and Mediums tending thereunto. The Humane nature of Chrift, a Creature above all creatures, lifted up above the higheft pitch of Angels , elevated into an Union with an infinite Perfbn, was not yet a Center to h felf. It had no fubfiftence of its own, neither did it operate for it felf j / fcek. not mine own glory, faith Chrift, Joh.8.$o. Nay, He adds, If I honour my jfelfi my honour is nothing , as much as to fay, a creature re- ferred to it felf is an unprofitable Nullity. In all his Doings and Sufferings , he did but minifter to the Will and Glory of God 5 in the end he will de- liver up the Kingdom to the Father, that God may be all in all, I Cor. 1 5. 24, & 28. Hence it is demon- ftratively evident,that no Creature, no, not the high- eft, is or can be an End or Center to it felf 5 all of them are but as Medium's to the glory of God : all muft circulate into their firft Fontal-principle, that it in all things may be glorified. In particu- lar, the Glory of God breaks forth in this Difpen- fation. Jefus Chrift, who in refpeft of the eternal generation is the *V*tf>a his mind refle&s tor- ment upon it felf : inwardly he is nothing but Wounds and amazing Horrors 5 the Apparitions of Wrath haunt him 3 Confcience is fenfus & pr judi- cium judicii divini, a kind of anticipation and pre- fenfation of the laft Judgment. After all this, to deny God to be juft, is to offer violence to the Prin- ciples of Nature, and put a lye upon thofe Notions which are born with, and inftamped upon our Rea- lon : It is to fay, That the Image and Imprefs of a Deity upon our hearts, is but a Counterfeit 5 That Confcience is but a Cheat, and all the Terrors there but a falfc Alarm. In a word, It is to eradicate all Religion, and open a Flood-gate to all wickednefs and impiety. Thefe being intolerable abfurdities, it cannot but be granted , that there is fuch an Attri- bute in GodrnrJ 0«£&riT«i <#*», faith Plutarch 5 Juftice follows God , or rather it is his very EfTence. It is an enquiry among Divines D How far it was nsceflary^that fiq (hould bepunifhed 5 that without * Sa- in the Sufferings ofChrift. 45 Satisfaction there fhould be no Remiflion. It is an Chap. 4. indubitable Verity, That it was neceilary by virtue K**sr** of Gods Decree: He hath declared himfelf, that he will by no means acquit the guilty. But this is not all. In Scripture, Punifhment is not attributed meer- ly to his Will or Decree, but to his juft and righte- ous Nature 5 Thou art righteous, Lord, becaufe thou haft- judged thus, Revel. 16. 5. Though the mode and circumftance of Punifhment be determined by his So- veraign pleafure, yet the punifhment it (elf iflucs out from his Juftice. Sin merits punifhment 5 They that do fuch things are worthy of death, Rom. I. 32. It is not meerly Gods Will, but his Juftice, which renders unto fin its due. The proportion which is between Sin and Punifhment, (hews who holds the ballance : Were it meerly at the divine Pleafure to punifh fin or not, God need not punifh obftinateand impenitent perfbns. This the Socinians themfelves cannot bear. They fay, There is one Juftice in God, umtfl ]uftu which he ever ufeth in punifhing contumacious Ua t1 Det f t fl' rm finners : nay, it would be unworthy of God not to dnm\cmZh t punifh them. Now, here two things may be obfer-^. OT '"V c ved: The one is this 5 Obftinacy is not punifhed for^^p/^^" it felf, for in good it is Conltancy and worthy ofatqv.exurmi- praife^ but it is punifhed becaufe it is in evil. Sing^ v s °p ars de is punifhed xa& *Vt3 for it felf, but Obftinacy fortheprima.cap.i. fin only 5 and if fin be punifhed for it felf, then J*ft«* **• every fin muft be punifhed. The other is this, If Je-/^/^t/^. fusChrift had not come and fatisfied for us, all finners mitt ere. creil. would have been impenitent and contumacious 5 the A e tt ^ e ° & 22< grace of Repentance would never have been given by an unatoned God 5 neither is it now derived to us, but through a Mediator. Him hath God exalted mth 4# Vindictive Jujlice fatisjied Chap. 4. with his right hand , to be a Prince and a Saviour, to give repentance, Acts 5. 31. Hence it appears, that without Chrift, all fin would have been in conjun- ction with impenitency, and confequently necefifari- ly puniftied. But a little more to clear this Neceffi- ty, I (hall lay down fome Particulars. 1 . Man, a rational Creature, could not be created, but he would immediately by the very frame of his Soul be under a Law. His Reafon by the innate no- tion of a Deity, could not but be bound to know the Supreme Truth. His Will by its propenfion to its proper Object, could not but be bound to love the Supreme Goodnefs. The Refpedts, which are in the rational Powers towards their Creator, are a Law never to be altered. God will no more diflblve them, than he will contradict his own work : Man cannot loofe himfelf from them, which are interwo- ven with his immortal Faculties. As long as God is God, the Supreme Truth and Goodnefs 3 and Man Man, an Intellective and Elective Creature 3 It rauft needs be indifpenfably juft for us to know and love our Creator. The differences of Good and Evil are founded in Nature. The Image of Righteoufnefs is not a movable thing, for then the love of God might be it to day, and by a Counter- motion, the hatred of him might be fuch to morrow , which is utterly impoffible. * 2. Man by his very Creation being under a Law , it could not be otherwife but God muft be a Rector and Judg over him. He that made, muft rule him 5 He that put a Law into his Faculties, muft be his Judg 5 His Rectitude and Juftice made him fit to be fo. Hence that of the Apoftle , Is God unrighteous who in the Sufferings ofChriji. 47 who taketh vengeance ? IJpeal^ & a man , God forbid^ Chap. 4. for then how Jfjrll God judg the world ? Rom. 5. 5, and 6 5 As if he had faicl , Unlcfs God ccafe to be Himfelf $ unlefs his Righteoufhefs and Juftice fail, He muft needs be Judg. 3. God being Reftor and Judg, He muft needs carry himfelf as becomes one of infinite Re&itude and Juftice. It is right, that fin fhould be punifhed 5 And fiall not the Judg of all the Earth do right $ After Man, nay all the Race of mankind, had for many Ages turned Rebels againft God , and vio- lated , and, as much as in them lieth , made void his Sacred Laws : After they had by the contempt of their fins defpifed his Majefty and Soveraignty, and by the turpitude of them offended his Purity and Holinefs} fhould all this pafs unpunifh'd, how black would the Confequence be ? Would it not be a blot to his Government to nod and let fill the reins of Difcipline? a flight to his Law to negleft it as a thing ill-contrived, or unworthy of a Vindication? Would not the great things of the Law appear very (mall, and the horrible Ataxy of fin a minute inconfidera- ble nothing ? Muft not the divine Attributes of Re- ctitude and Juftice be co-fufferers with that Law, upon whofe Commands and Comminations their very Image is engraven ? Would not the face of things look, as if the moral Foundations , the Dif- ferences of good and evil, were (haken and deftroy- ed 3 as if all things were indifferent, and fin or no fin, were all one to the Holy One ? Which way fhould his infinite hatred and abhorrence of fin be manifefted 5 no more difpleafure outwardly appear- ing at a world of fin, than there would at none at all > 48 Vindi&ive Juftice fathfted all ? The total managery of things no way demon- ftrating Sin to be odious, or Holineis grateful 5 Obe- dience failing , and there being nothing vicarious , no PuniQiment to fupply the room of it 5 How could the order between the Creator and the Crea- ture be preferved ? or what would become of that moral dependance and fubjedtion which we owe to our Maker ? Doubtlefs no defect, no jeofail can be in his Sacred Government. His juft Anger requires, that Difcipline {hould be kept , Manners corrected, and Licentioufhefs fuppreffed. As an Ancient fpeaks : siiYgimus ad Man being under a Law , God muft needs be Re- llfSVr^ ^ andbei "g f uc *, He cannot chufe but aft like ww, fedutdif- himfelf, in a juft decorum to his holy Attributes and ciptina ferve- L aw ; No blot or irregularity can light upon his ilgauurfucen' Government. Sin, which makes a breach upon the gg|g comprima- facred Order , muft be reduced in fiich a punitive ^ir^f^way, as may bear witnefs to his Rectitude and cut in homine Juitice. There are two things in Sin 5 a Macula^ a necejfaria efi , corrU ptinpr Spot ; and a Reatus , an obliging; Guilt. quo ad homi- 1 ne Spot is luch a 1 urpitude and ill-temper or mm pervenit m ind, that the Soul, in which it is refident and reg- La#! de Ira nant o cannot have Happinefs 5 the Guilt is fiich a Dei. Chain and ftrong binder unto Wrath, that the Soul, to which it adheres , cannot have Impunity. The Wifdom of God fecures and afcertains the firft, Why (hould not his Juftice fecure and afcertain the fecond 5 feeing God by the Law of his Eflence, is as much bound to act in congruity to his Juftice, as to his Wifdom ? 4. Upon fuppofal that a Punifhment or Sati£ faction were not neceffary, What {hould thofe mil- lions of Sacrifices and {lain Beafts under the Law mean ? in the Sufferings of Chrift. 49 mean ? If the fubftance, the Sacrifice of Chrift might Chap. 4, have been fpared, whatfhould the types and ftiadows do > Nay, why fhould the Son of God come, and fweat, and bleed, and dye upon a Crofs under Di- vine Wrath, if all this might have been fpared ? God doth not multiply things without caufc, much left did he make his dear Son the Curfe caufelefS. The A- poftle tells us, That it was vot prjpble that the blood of Bulls and Goats Jhould take away (in, Heb. 10. 4. But why fo? if a meer nothing, a no-facrifice might do it ? He fignally diftinguifhes 5 the blood of Beafts purifies the flefh, and takes away Ceremonial Guilt. But, which is infinitely more, the blood of Chrift purges the Confcience, and takes away real Guilt, Heb.y. 13,14. But will not this diftinttion be al- together vain, if no blood at all were requifite to take away guilt > Alfo the Apoftle aflerts, That we are juflificd by Chrifis bloody Rom. 5. 9 5 But why not without it, if a Satisfaction were unneceflary? It is very hardly imaginable, that the All-wife God fhould fetch a compafs, and go round about by his Sons blood , when a word, a merciful pleafure, might have done the work without it. Thefe things premifed, I now proceed to fhew how Punitive Juftice was manifefted in the Sufferings of Chrift. The Apoftle fpeaks memorably, God Jet forth Chrift to be a propitiation to declare his righte- oufnefs, for the remijjlon of fwsx, as if he had faid, There could be no remijfion without it : and to make it the more emphatical, he doubles the phrafe, To de- clare, I fay, at this time his righteoufnefs 5 and withal he adds, That he may be jujl, Rom. 3. 25, 26. Righ- teoufnefs, that is, Punitive Juftice was eminently de- H moriftrated *o Vindi&ive Jujlice fatisfied Chap. 4. monftrated in the propitiatory Sufferings of Chrift} unlefs this were fb, no fufficient account could be poflibly given of them. The Socimans, who deny Chrift's Satisfaction, cannot give a tolerable reafon thereof: For what fay they } Chrift in his Sufferings was an example of Patience. I anfwer, he was fo 5 but there was a Cloud of fuffering-Martyrs be- fore his Incarnation : and then what Angular thing was there in his Paffion? It's true, he was the greatert Pattern that ever was 5 but had that been alL, why did he fuffer as our Sponfbr and Mediator ? why did he bear the Sin of a World, and the Wrath of God due to it ? Here he was alone, no man, no Angel was able to trace or follow him. The Saints may fill up the Sufferings of Chrift in his myftical body 5 but they cannot, dare not afpire fo far, as to go about to imitate him in thofe fatisfiiftory Ones, which were in his own proper body. Had he been only an exemplary Saviour, he could have faved none at all : Not thofe under the Old Teftament 5 for Ex- ample doth not, like Merit, look backward to thofe who were before it : Nor thofe under the New ; for no meer Example, no, not that of an Incarnate God, could have railed up Man out of the ruins of the Fall, unlefs there had been in his Sufferings a Satisfaction to Juftice. The Guilt of Sin could not have been done away, unlefs there had been therein a Merit to procure the Holy Spirit. The Power of Sin could not have been fubdued} a meer exemplary Chrift would have been but a titular Saviour. The great defign of railing up a Church out of the cor- rupt Ma(s of Mankind would have failed, a Pattern only being too weak a bottom for it to ftand upon. Again • ^ in the Sufferings of Chriji. 5 i Again they fay, Chrift differed, that he might con- Chap. 4. firm the Covenant with his own blood. I anfwer, v*~">r^ the Covenant was confirmed in Abrahams time, Gal. 3. 17. It was made immutable by Gods Word and Oath, He!?. 6. 1 7. It was ratified by the glorious Mi- racles of Chrift 5 it was fealed up by the precious blood of Martyrs : and why muft the Son of God dye for it ? or if he muft, might not a Ample death ferve ? Why was there a Curfe, and an horrible De- fcrtion upon him? There can be no imaginable co- herence or connexion between his bearing the tokens of Gods Wrath, and his confirming the Covenant of Grace, the one can have no congruity or fubfervi- ency to the other. The Scripture therefore, which gives a better account, tells us that he dyed to pay a hvrepv, a Ranfbm for us 3 obtain eternal Redemp- tion, abolifh and make an end of fin 5 deliver from the world, and the wrath to come 5 reconcile to God, purchafe a Church, and bring in everlafting Righte- oufhefi, and an happy Immortality fuitable thereun- to. Thefe noble and excellent ends could not be compaiTed, but by Sufferings penal and fatisfa&ory , fuch as had the bitter ingredients of Divine Wrath and difpleafure in them. Chrift was not a meer Witneis, but a Prieft, Redeemer, and Mediator : His blood was not only ^eTJ^oK,aTeftimony,but l*Arneto'p> a Propitiation 5 neither was it only confirmative of the Covenant, but fundative : all the Promifes of Grace and Glory fprung up out of his fatisfa&ory and meritorious Paflion. Further they fay, that in his Sufferings the immenfe Love of God was mani- fcfted. I anfwer, His immenfe Love was indeed ve- ry Illuftrious in giving his Son 5 but to what purpofe H 2 was _ * i r e|2 VindiSiwe Jnjiice fatisjied Chap. 4. was he given, but to be a Propitiation ? \v 7*7?) In this was love, that he Jet; t his Son to be a propitiation for our (ins, faith the Apoftle, 1 John 4. ic. When inexorable Juftice ftood as an Obftacle in the way 5 when Satisfoftion muft be made, or mankind eter- nally perifh 5 then infinite Love appeared in giving the only begotten Son to be an expiatory facrifice for us, to farisfie Juftice, that we might partake of Mercy. But if a Satisfaftion were needlefs, if the Sufferings of Chrift might have been fpared 5 Where is the vehemence of Love ? It may feem rather to be in Remiffion of fin, than in the Pafiion of our Savi- our. That Remiffion fhould come to us through his intervenient Death, when that Death was not ne- ceffary, looks not fo much like an aft of Love, as of Sapience : and yet how Sapience (hould unneceflarily, and without juft caufe, order fo great a thing as the Death of Chrift to be, I cannot underftand. More- over they fay, Chrift fuffered, that his Death inter- vening, we might be aflured by his Refurre&ion, of our own, and of life eternal to be obtained in a way of Obedience. But I anfwer , This is rather to af- fen the end of Chrifts Refurreftion , than of his De^th : for his Death here comes in only by the by, as a meer intervenient thing, a caufa fine qua non, a thing which hath no proper end of its own. It is not to me imaginable, that fuch an one as he was, (hould dye meerly to teftifie to thofe things, which were before fecured by the immutable Word and Oath of God himfelf. heaths nos, quorum caufa JDeus jurat ! miferos^ ji ne juranti credimm I faith Tertullian : his Oath cannot but be a fufficiem; fecu- rity. It's true, Chrifts Death and Refurre&ion do aflure in the Sufferings ofChrifl. ^ 3 allure Believers, that they fhall rife and live for Chap. 4 ever in Glory: But how do they do it? what, ex- emplarily only ? no furcly, his Death was fatisfa&ory for fin, and meritorious of life eternal. His Re- furreftion was a Seal, a pregnant proof, that the Sa- tisfaction made by his Death was full and confum- mate. Hence arifes in Believers an aifurance of Life and Immortality, the fame being purchafed and paid for by the blood of Jcfus. Had his Death and Re- furre&ion been exemplary only, which way (hould an aifurance be drawn from it ? The argument, if any, muft run after fome fuch rate as this : Jefus Chrift, God as well as Man, one having Power over his own life, free from all fin, never feeing cor- ruption,, able to overcome death it (elf, did rife from the graven Ergo, meer men, having no power over their lives, tainted with fin, fubjeft to corrup- tion, unable to conquer death, fhall rife alfo : the inconfequence is apparent. On the other hand let the argument run thus : Jefus Chrift did by a paf- fion of infinite Merit and Satisfaction, purchafe eter- nal life for Believers^ Ergo, they (hall be fure to have it : here the conlequence muft needs be fure and infallible. Upon the whole matter it appears, that no tolerable account can be given of Chrifts Suf- ferings, unlefs Juftice were fatisfied and declared therein. But to explicate this more diftin&ly, I (hall a little confider three things : 1. God the great Rector, who inflided thofe Suf- ferings on Chrift. 2. Chrift the Patient, who bore them. 3. The Sufferings in themfelves, and in their fruits. i.God s>a Vindiciive Jnjlice fatisfed Chap. 4. 1. God, the righteous R.eftor, who infli&edthem, was one of infinite Mercy. Mercy in men, though but finite, is fometimes a rcmora to punifhment. Jo- feph, being buriedtCavii^totllvvx ' of old, who engaged life for life, was this, That they had not a juft power over their lives to give them as a Compenfation for others 3 but Chrift might juftly confent, he had power over his own life : I have power, faith he, !&*£«*, au- thority to lay down my life, and authority to take it up again, Joh. 10. J 8. Hence it appears, that his con- tent to fuffer punifhment for us, was a very juft valid one, it being in that, which he had authority over 5 and where there is fuch a juft confent, there an inno- cent one may fuffer for the guilty. It's true, an in- nocent one meerly as fuch cannot be punifhed 3 nei- ther did our Saviour fuffer as fuch, but as one in con- junction with us, as our Goel and Sponfbr, who un- dertook to bear the punifhment of our fins. It could not be unjuft for him to undertake it 5 and after un- dertaking, it could not but be juft for him to per- form it 5 efpecially, feeing his perfbn could not fink under his Sufferings , and his Sufferings could not be in vain, or to no purpofe. He rofe as a glorious Viftor, and out of his Penal Evils fprung that great Good, in the Sufferings of Chriji. tp Good, the Redemption of a World. Chap. 4. 3. The Sufferings of Chriffc are to be confidered in themfelves, and in their fruits. Take them in them- felves, Juftice appears in the proportionablenels of them : in punifhing Juftice holds the Ballance, it weighs and meafuresout Penal Evils for Moral .-Judg- ments on Sinners are called, the portion of their mea- sures, Jer. 13. 25. as being infli&ed in a due propor- tion. Now the Sufferings of Chrift were proportio- nable in divers refpe&s. 1. There was a proportion between the feats of Suffering in Chrift, and the feats of Sin in us. Man finned in his body, Sin was organically and inftru- mentally there 5 proportionably Chrift fuffered in his body , no part of it but was racked upon a torment- ing Croft :becaufe our Corporeal Parts had been wea- pons of Iniquity, Juftice made his the fubje&s of Mifery. Man finned in his Soul, there was the prime and chief feat of Sin 5 proportionably Chrift fuffered in his Soul 3 nay, there was the prime and chief feat of Suffering : becaufe the main refidence and venom of fin was in our Souls, the greateft preffure, andbit- terne(s of wrath was upon his. He was exceeding for- rowful, even to death } He was fore amazed, and as it were fainted away 5 yea, for very anguifh he fweat drops of blood, and upon the Crols, cryed out, My God, my God, why hafi thou forfaken me $ All this befel him, who was fortitude and conftancy it fel£ Under the Law, Juftice had eye for eye, tooth for tooth, wound for wound, ftripe for ftripe^ in Jefus Chrift it had a Suffering body and foul , as a Com- penfation for the finning bodies and fouls of Men. 2. There was a proportion between the Penal Suf- I 2 ferings 60 VindiSiwe Jujlice fatisjied Chap. 4. ferings in Chrift, and thofe in the thrcatning of the Law. Chrift fuffered not the very Idem, neither in- deed could he do fo 5 becaufe there was a change of perfon, and in ftri&nefs, Si alius folvit, alhtdjol- vitnr : but his Sufferings came as near to thofe in the Law, as could poffibly ftand with a juft decorum to his Sacred Perfon 5 as little was abated as might be. This will appear by the many fteps of his Humilia- tion. He, the Son of God, very God, affumed our frail Nature. But might this infinite and wonderful Condefcenfion fatisfie Juftice for the fin of the world? no, He muft be under the Law, and fulfil all Righ- teoufnefs. Well, that being done, might that obe- dience ( wherein fo high an Honour was reflefted upon the Law, as that it was obeyed perfe&ly in all things, and that by its Maker ) fatisfie for fin ? No, that alone was not enough, there muft be fhedding of blood, or no Remiffion. But if there muft be blood, might not a few drops of his blood, the fame being of an infinite value, do the work ? No, the Law calls for Death, without that he could not be an expiatory Sacrifice for us. But if a Death muft be, might not a fimple one, being of fb great a perfon, ferve the turn ? No, the Law pronounces a Curfe, and that he was made , the marks and tokens of Wrath were upon him .• and why all this, but that God would have his Sufferings comply, and come as near the terms of the Law as might be ? It's true, he did not bear the accidentals of punifhment , his Sufferings were not eternal j but in the Law punifh- ment is eternal, only as it relates to a finite Creature, which can never fatisfie, but not as it relates to a mighty Sponfor, who could pay down all at once, and in the Sufferings ofChriji. 6 1 and fwallow up death in Viftorv. He differed not Chap. 4. the worm of Conference, or Defperation : But the <^~>r-^ firft of thefe is from Sin, inherent, and putrifying in Confciencc 5 and the fecond jfrom the Imbecillity of of the Creature, finking under its burden, neither of which could be in him. He bore not the acci- dentals of punifhment 5 but as great a pcrfbn as he was, the elTentials could not be abated. There was in his Sufferings P Thef. Salmur. de paff. Colle&ion of all men, however mul- tChriftl - tiplied, will never equal the Power, Autho- in the Sufferings of Chrift. 6$ Authority, Dignity, Wifdom, San&ity, and Deity of Chrift. In the Sufferings of a world, every fufferer would have been but ameer Creature, but in his Sufferings, the fufferer was no lefs than God himfelf. Here therefore Juftice appears more fignally, than if all the world had fuffered, and that for ever. His Sufferings, though but Temporary, did more than counterpoife the eternal Sufferings of a world. Should we fuppofe, which is impoffible,that all men had paid and pailed through eternal Sufferings , thofe would have delivered them from the Curfe of the Law 5 the Sufferings of Chrift ( which fhews their Equi* valency, and more ) produce the fame effeft, and over and above merit life eternal. There is a dou- ble order in punifhing : The order of Juftice would have a punifhment infinite in Magnitude 5 but becaufe a finite Creature cannot bear it, the order of Wif- dom will have it infinite in Duration. But as the French Divines have oblerved, Chrift being fubfti- *H- ^ainu dfr tuted in our room, the order of Juftice returns again, nece " m SaU Our Saviours Sufferings were of an infinite value, the fum of Sufferings was paid down all at once. In thefe therefore Juftice is more Illuftrious, than it could have been in eternal Ones 5 wherein mere fi- nite Creatures would have been ever a paying a little^ and a little, but could never have fatbfied Divine Juftice. Thus the Sufferings of Chrift in thcmfelves, do by their excellent proportionablenefs manifeft the Juftice of God ^ but befides, the confequents and fruits of them, (hew the fulneis of his Satisfaction to that Juftice. And the(e may be confidered with re- fpeft to Chrift himfelf or el(e with refpeft to us. As 64 Vindictive Juftice fat is jied Chap. 4. AstoChrift himfelf, What were the confequents of his Sufferings ? The pains of death were loofed, as not able to hold fuch a Satisfier as he was 5 He was taken from prifbn Ifa. 53. 8. as having difcharg- ed all : He had an acquittance in his Refurreftion, as a (lire proof, that he had made full payment in his death : The God of peace brought him again from the dead^ Heb. 13. 20. Obferve,it was the God of Peace. Firft, the Divine Juftice was appealed, and then the Divine Power railed him up. He had all the Power in Heaven, and in Earth, Matth. 28. 18, as an infal- lible witnefs, that he had by his Blood reconciled all things there. He afcended, and entred into the true Sanftuary, into Heaven it felf 5 and this tells us, that the expiatory and fatisfaftory blood was fhed before in his Death.* He appears in the pre fence of God for us Heb. 9. 245 and that allures us, that the Di- vine Anger is over : having by himfelf purged our (ins^ he fate down at the right hand of the Majefiy on high^ Heb. 1. 3. His fatisfa&ory-work was perfectly done, and then he refted in ftate. All thefe glorious Con- fequents make it appear, that his Satisfaction was a plenary one. As to us, the fulnels of his Satisfaftion appears, in that Juftice hath nothing at all to demand from fuch as are in him, and by Faith become myftical parts and pieces of him ; the atoning Blood is upon them, and the damning Law paffes over them. Thus the Apo- ftle faith, There is no condemnation to thofe which are in Chriji Jcfus, Rom. 8. 1. The Apoftle faith not, that there is nihil condemnabile, for the reliques of fin are in them : but he faith, there is nulla con- demnation in the Manifeftation of Chriji. 65 demnatio^ no condemnation to them 5 for the Sat if- Chap. 4. faftion applied, cleanfes away fin, and delivers from Wrath. It's true, Believers may have afflictions 5 but what are they ? They are only Caftigatory, and for their good 5 not Vindictive, or for the Satisfa- ction of Juftice. Again, the fulnefs of his Satisfaction appears, in that his Sufferings were not mcerly fetif faCtory, but redundantly meritorious. Thefe have opened Heaven, as well to let down thofe influen- ces of Grace to us , which, unlets Juftice had been appeafed, would never have fallen upon us, as to in- troduce us into that life and blefled Immortality which we guilty and defiled Creatures, while fuch, could not be capable of. We fee here, that the Sa- tisfaction of our Saviour was not a poor, fhort, or fcanty thing 5 but good meafure, preifed down, and running over in the purchafe of all good things for us. It was a good faying, Vitlmra Chrijii font biblia pratfica^ the Sufferings of Chrift, in which Juftice fo eminently appears, are a ftrong Motive to Repen- tance 5 enough, if duly confidered, to fet all men a weeping over their iniquities : What, did the Crea- tor fuffer ? Was the Lord of Glory crucified ? Was the blefTed One made a Curie? Did the Son of God, very God, fo dear, fb great a perfon, fweat, bleed, cry out, and expire upon a tormenting Crofs, and all this to take away fin ? What a fpectacle is this ? Who can look upon it with dry eye?, or an unmelt- ing heart ? When the Son of God was broken, fliould our hearts be untouched ? May we fpareour tears, when he parted with his blood? To look up- on his wounds, and not mourn over our fins, can be K no 66 Vindictive Jujiice fatisjied Chap. 4. no lefs than unnatural hardnefs. Oh ! what a thing is fin ? how horrible, how infinite an evil, that it could not be expiated at an eafier rate, than the blood of God himfelf ? What Plea can be made, or colour given for fo vile a thing, that it (hould have a Being in the world, or fo much as a refidence in an humane Thought ? Should that be indulged which coft JefusChrift (b dear? or that go free, which nailed him to the Crols? Canft thou love that which ftabbed him at the heart ? or live in that for which he dyed ? May that be light, which preffed him into an agony and bloody-fweat ? or that fvveet, which put fo much Gall and Vinegar into his Cup ? Canft thou blefs thy felf in that which made him a Curfe? or follow after that which made him cry out of for- faking ? Think, and again think, if thy blind eyes and hard heart will let thee, what, and how dreadful a thing it is for thee to go on in thine iniquities. In (b doing, thou doft not meerly run upon the Au- thority and Soveraignty of the Almighty, but upon the wounds and blood of thy dear Saviour, impi- oufly trampling them under thy impure feet : and how grievous a thing is this ? If thou art fearlefs, and lloppeft not here, what hope canft thou have ? It becomes thee to fit down and lament that hellifh impetus in thy own heart, which moves (wiftly to- wards Hell, without admitting any rcmora. A few words from God gave check to Abimelech , Gen. 20. And (hall not the wounds and blood of thy dear Lord do as much to thee ? The fword of an Angel put a ftop to Balaam in his perverfe way, Numb. 22. And wilt thou go on, who haft feen the fword of God drawn againft the Man 3 his fellow, for thine iniquities ? If the groans in the Sufferings ofChriji. 6y groans of the Creatures, all round about, founding Chap. 4. in thine ears, did not ftartle thee, yet (houldeft thou be deaf and fenflcfs to the Sufferings of thy Saviour, bleeding and dying upon a Crofs, m companion of which the dafhing down of a world is a poor no- thing? If the breaches of the Sacred Law, dearer to God than Heaven and Earth, do not move thee , yet wilt thou not be moved, when thou feeft that amazing fight , God for our fins bruifing and break- ing his Son, hiseflential Image, in our aflumed Na- ture ? If thou doft not blufh at the blots and tur- pitudes which fin hath made in thy own foul , yet methinks it (hould deeply affeft thee, that the Son of God was made fin and a Curfe for thee. Should God let thee down to Hell, and after fome fcorches from the fire unquenchable, take thee up again , wouldeft thou yet go on in fin? no furely } and why wilt thou do it now,after thou haft feen fuch a fpefta- cle of Juftice in the Lord Jefus, as more than coun- tervails the Sufferings of a world ? When a Temp- tation approaches, How is it that thou feeft not the price of blood writ upon it ? Which way doft thou forget the nails and bloody Crofs of thy Redeemer? Thou feeft plainly, that God is a juft, a righteous One 5 and for a full proof of it, he hath written Juftice in red Letters, in the Paflion of his own Son 5 if thou run on in thy fins, how, which way canft thou efcape ? God fpared not his own Son, ftanding in our room , and will he (pare thee in thy impenitent finning ? Wrath fell very feverely upon the Holy, Innocent, meek Lamb of God : and will it pafi over thee, wallowing in thy filthy lufts and corruptions ? What , did God exaft (b great a Sa- lt 2 tisfa&ion £g Vindi&bive Juftice fatkfied Chap. 4. tisfa&ion for tin, that it might be allowed ? Did he vindicate his broken Law at fo high a rate, that it might be more broken, and that with Impunity ? Tis utterly impoflible : thofe Sufferings of Chrift which did witnefs Gods hatred of Sin, could not open a gap to it : the Surety did not fweat, pray^ bleed, and dye under Wrath, that the impenitent (in- ner might be fpared. O how profane and blafphe- mous is fuch a thought, which makes the great Re- deemer a Patron of iniquity ! He came to fave us from our fins, not in them 5 to redeem from ini- quity, not to encourage it 5 What then? where is thy hope, O impenitent (inner ? Is it in Gods Mer- cy? As infinite as it is, it will not let out a drop to the impenitent , neither indeed can it do fo , unlefs, which is impofiible, one Attribute can croft another 3 Mercy can reproach Holinefs or Juftice. Believe it, Salvation it felf cannot fave thee in thy fins : Is it in Chrift and his Merits ? He is the Saviour of the Body, but thou art out of it. He is the Author of eternal Salvation to them that obey him : but thou art a Rebel. May Chrift be divided ? Canft thou have a part in his Prieftly office, who art in Arms daily againft his Kingly ? Shall the Promifes comfort thee, who cafteft off the Righteous Commands ? It cannot be. What Concord hath Chrift with Belial? How ill-fuited are an hard heart and a bleeding Savi- our? How canft thou truft in that Jefus, whom thou defpifeft, and crucifieft afrefh by thy Rebelli- ons ? or depend on his Merits, when thou lived in enmity againft his Divine Spirit and Life ? Thefe are meer inconfiftencies. Thy cafe, while thou in the Sufferings ofCbrifi. 6p thou art in thy fins, is very forlorn and defpe- Chap. 4. rate. God will be a confuming fire to thee 5 thy felf muft be as dry ftubble before him 3 everv luft will be a never-dying worm 5 thy foul will furioufly refle& upon it fclf for its prodigious folly 5 abufed Mercy will turn into fury. Chrift, the great Saviour, will doom thee to perdition 5 fire and brimftone, and an horrible temped: will be rained down upon thee , and that for ever. If then thou haft any fear of God, or love to thy felf , caft away thy tranfgreflions, and return to him , that thou mayeft efcape the Wrath to come, and enjoy the pure beatitudes which are in Heaven. CHAP. 7Q Chap. 5, CHAP. V. Gods Love and Mercy mamfejied, in that he flood not upon the old terms as he mighty and in giving his Son for us. The Socinian objection ( That if God loved us, he was not angry ) anfwered. The ear line fs and freenefs of Gods Love in giving his Son. The greatnefs of the Gift. The manner how he was given. The perfons for whom. The evils removed^ and the good procured by it. The excellent Evangelical terms built upon it. Thefe are eafie and fore. The Love and Mercy of God an excellent Motive to fiir up our Love towards God and Man. HAVING fpoken of Gods Juftice, I now proceed to his Love, Mercy, and Grace. Thefe are eminently afcribed to him in Scripture: He is love it felf 1 John 4. 16. effentially fuch. He is the Father of 'mercies, 2 Cor. 1.3. Mercy is his off-fpring and joy. He is the God of all grace, 1 Pet. 5. 10. The fountain of it is in him, and all Graces in the Creature iffue from thence. Love communicates good to the Creature. Mercy communicates it to the Creature in mifery. Grace communicates it to a Creature, though unworthy. All the drops and meafures of goodnefs in the Creature, are from Love : when the good is fuited to the mifery of the Crea- ture, 'tis Mercy 5 when it exceeds defert, and as it were triumphs over unworthinefs , 'tis Grace in a fpecial manner. I fhall not difcourfe of thefe di- ftin&ly, but, as the ufage in Scripture is, promifeu- oufly ? Gods Love and Mercy ^ &c. 7 1 oufly 5 thefe are in a very fignal manner manifefted Chap. 5. in Chrift. So admirable a Glafs is he, that not only Wifdom, Holinefs, and Juftice are reprefented in him 5 but Love, Mercy and Grace alfo. In thefe it is that this wonderful Oeconomy terminate?. Wifdom laid the plot, Holinefs and Juftice appeared in our Saviours Paflion, but the Center of all is Grace and Mercy. Thefe are highly exalted in the Reconcilia- tion and Salvation of Men. The firft appearance of thefe (lands in this, That God did not (land upon the firft terms, upon the Old Covenant of Works : God made Adam a very knowing and righteous Creature, he gave him ex- cellent Laws, Moral ones infcribed in his heart 5 and over and above , one pofitive Law in the Tree of knowledg : He entred into a Covenant with him, as the head and root of all mankind 3 the terms were, That all his Pofterity fhould ftand or fall in him. He tranfgrefled the Command of God, and fb Sin and Death came upon all the humane World. Here God might have flood upon the firft terms , he was not bound to make new ones, but might have flood upon the old, and profecuted them to the utter ruin of all Mankind. This is plain by thefe Confi- derations. 1. The Lav/s given by God to Adam were (uch, as became God to give, and Adam to receive, very juft and righteous. The Moral Ones were congru- ous to his holy Faculties, and conducible to hisHap- pinefs: they were interwoven into his very rati- onal Powers, and Obedience might have come forth in the eafinefs of his Holy Principles. The pofitive one was a juft one. God, who made Man Lord of * -*" the j 2 Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. the lower World, might well except one Tree, as t^-V'Hj a token of his Supreme Soveraignty, when the thing forbidden was not a thing in it (elf evil, but indif- ferent. Gods Authority appears the more Sacred, and Mans Obedience would have been the more pure 5 the Tree, as lovely to the eyes, was a fit curb to the fenfitive appetite. And as a Tree of know- ledg was a juft restraint to intelle&ual curiofity, the ♦ prohibition of fuch a Tree was an excellent It$m to man to look to both faculties 5 the terms were juft, not only as to himfelf, but as to his pofterity. Had not God made them, he would never have told us, that all finned in one 5 and that by one, judgment came upon all, Rom. 5.12, & 18. Which, without fuch terms, would have been impoflible 5 and if he made them, it was no lefs impoflible that they fhould be unjuft. Adam was the root and head of Man- kind 5 we were in him naturally as latent in his loins, and legally as comprifed within the Covenant. His Peribn was the fountain of ours, and his Will the reprefentative of ours. The thing therefore was equal : unjuft Laws (hould be abrogated «, butin this cafe, the Laws and Terms being Righteous , God might have ftood ftriftly upon them. 2. Adam having holy Pov/ers, fufficient forOhe- p ^ dience, was bound to keep them with all diligence : V /ouuavUi that, which was^formerly fpoken to the Church in S f vJ Thyaiira , Hold fajl that which thou haji Rev. 2. 25. U was virtually fpoken to Adam : Nature diftatcs, that Duty fhould be returned where benefits are received. The Law of fidelity requires, that a Truftce fhould keep the depofitum. God intruded man with excel- lent endowments $ but if he will by his tranfgref- fion in the Manifejiation of Chrift. 73 fion caft them away, muft God make them good? Chap. 5. Muft he follow after a Rebel, a wafting bankrupt Creature, to repair the loft Image, and fet him up a- gain with a new ftock of Grace ? No: He, who made him ex bencplacito^ cannot be bound ex jttfti- tia, to new-frame him, being broken 5 He might with- out the leaft fpot of injuftice, have left all mankind in the ruins of the Fall. 3. The cafe of the fallen Angels determines this point : When they left their Principle, or firft Eftate, Did God capitulate, or enter into new Articles with them ? Was there a tabula pofi nanfragium, a room for Faith or Repentance? Had they a Chrift, or a Gofpel tendred unto them ? No, they were caft down immediately into chains of darknefs. The (entence was irreverfible, their mifery eternal 5 an- nihilation would have been a kind of favour to them. That God, who flood upon the firft terms with Angels, fuperior creatures, might have done fo with man, being a little lower than thofe glorious Creatures. I know there are differences affigned between the two Cafes. Angels were the firft tranf- greffors, the ring-leaders in fin : Man followed af- ter. The Angels had a moft pure light, and that with- out any allay of flefh : Mans intelleft was lower, arid in conjunction with matter. The Angels fin- ned by (elf-motion, and of their own meerly : Man finned by feduftion, and through the guile of the Serpent. In the Fall of Angels, all the Angelical nature fell not : In Adams Fall, all the humane Na- ture fell ., no Religion was left in the lower world. But notwithftanding all this, God might in Juftice have ftood upon the firft terms with Man, as well as L with j a Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. with Angels 3 and that he did not do fo, it was from meer Grace, as the primary Reafon thereof. 4. Grace is in a very eminent manne r lifted up in the Gofpel. Grace gives Chrift, and Faith to be- lieve in him. Grace juftifies and fan&ifies. Grace faves and crowns with a blefled Immortality. Every- where in the Gofpel founds forth, Grace, Grace 3 but if God might not juftly have ftood upon the old terms , the giving of new ones to Man, was not Grace, but Debt 3 not Mercy, but Juftice. Thofe Novatores, who fay, That it would have been un- juft for God to have condemned Adams Pofterity for the firft Sin, do thereby overturn the Grace of the Gofpel. The Apoftle, who is much rather to be believed, faith exprefly, That by the offence cf cne^ judgment came upon all men to condemnation^ Rom. 5. 18 5 that is, according to the terms of the. old Covenant 3 but if the old terms might not have been ftood upon, the new ones muft be neceflary and due to mankind , and fo no Grace at all. They who deny the Juftice of the old Covenant, over- turn the Grace of the new. God, as we fee, might have ftood upon the old terms, even to the utter ruin of fallen mankind. But, oh ! immenfe Love ! He would not 3 he would do fb with Angels, but he would not with Men 3 an abatement was made to them, not afforded to thofe nobler Creatures, once Inmates of Heaven. In the cafe of Sodom^ God came down lower and lower, from fifty righteous perfons, to forty five 5 and fb at laft to ten, I will not do it for tens fake, Gen. 18. 32. But in the cafe of fallen man, when all had finned, when there was none righteous, no, not one 5 God in the Manifejlation of Chriji. 75 God comes down from the firft terms made with Chap. 5. Man, to fuch lower ones as might comply with his vx—v"^ frailty. Under the Law there were Sacrifices called . K by the J ewijh Doftors , Gnokh\na]ored^ amending, j( Ua(Ot< and defending. The rich man 'offered a Lamb, the poor, whofe hand could not reach fo far , offered two Turtle -Doves. While Man was rich in Holy Powers and Excellencies, God called for pure per- fect finlefs Obedience 5 but after the Fall, he being poor in Spirituals, altogether unable to pay fiich a fum, God (loops and accommodates himielf to Hu- mane wcaknefs 5 a faithful conatus, a fincere, though imperfeft Obedience, will ferve the turn in order to Mans happinefs. This is the firft ftep which infinite Mercy takes in railing up Man out of the ruins of the Fall, The old terms were not flood upon. But now, that new terms might be made and efta- blifhed, that the fecond Covenant might have an happier iflue than the firft, Mercy goes onto give the Son of God for us : God fo loved the -world^ that he gave kis only begotten Son , that rvhofoever believeth in him , Jlwnld not peri/h^ but have ever* lifting life, John 3. 1 6. This ( jfo) is unutterable, this Love unmeafiirable, diffufing it (el£ not to Jews only, but to a World, and that overwhelmed in fin 5 giving, and that freely, without any Merit of ours , a Son, and an only begotten Son, that we through faith in him might have life eternal, and there enjoy him who is Love it (elf, for ever. Here is a Mine of Love too deep and rich for any Crea- ture to fathom, or count the value of it. But be- fore I open it, I (hall firft remove the ill u(e which L 2 the j6 Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. the Socinians make of this Love, to overturn Chrifts wrv-^ Satisfa&ion. If God (fay they J fo loved .us, as Vem'jm'pU. t0 § ive hlS S ° n for US > then be WaS not an g r 7 With atijfimum ejfe 9 us 5 and if not angry , then there was no need at all Soc. de Serv. f a Satisfa&ion to be made for us. Unto which I w»»vw%i«,anfwer^ Anger and Love are not inconfiftencies, in iram divhm, Scripture both are attributed unto God: He gave \Tm%Tfi7 g n en, his Son for ns, was not that Love, immenfe Love? ubi nil nip im- He wounded. and bruifed him for our iniquities : he Ten? T^' *' ma ^ e hi™ t0 he fin and a curfe for us - y Was not there jctiatur Dm, Wrath, great Wrath? We have both together, in cm unigenitum one Text, . Herein is love, not that we loved God, dabat? Sclid-^ that he loved us, and fent his Son to he the pro- ing. contr. pitiation for our fins, 1 John 4. 10. The high Em- phafis of his Love, was in giving his Son to be a Pro- pitiation for us: unlefs there had been jufl: anger, a Propitiation would have been needlefs$ unlefs there had been immenfe Love, his Son (hould not have been made one for us. We have a plain in- ftance in Job's friends 5 Gods Wrath was kindled againft them, and yet in love he direfts them to atone him by a Sacrifice, Job 42. 7, 8. God could not but be angry- at the Sin of the World, and yet in love he, gave his Son to be an expiatory, Sacri- fice. But for a more full anfwer, I (hall lay down ftveral things : 1. God may be confidered either as a Reftor, or as a Benefaftor. As a Re&or, he afts out of a juft anger in vindicating his broken Law by Penal Suf- ferings. As a Benefa&or, he afts out of admirable love, \n giving his Son to be a Propitiation for us. When he vindicates his Law by Punifhments, Is it not Anger ? when he gives his Son for us, Is it not * Love ? in the Manifejlation of Chriji. yy Love ? If he be a Reftor, Can he not be a Benefit- Chap. 5. dor too? Then he could not give his* Son without laying down of his Government. If he be a Bene- factor, Can he not be a Re&or too ? Then he could not govern, without laying down his Love 5 but if, as the truth is, he may be both, then Anger and Love may confift together. 2. Gods difpleafure may be taken either as it terminates on the fin, or as it terminates on the (in- ner 5 as it terminates on the fin, it is altogether un- removable. God himfelf, with reverence be it fpoken, can no more remove it, than he can lay down his Sanftity, which in the very notion of it, in- cludes an abhorrency of fin : As it terminates on - the (inner , (b it may be removed. This appears, in that God pardons (in, and that ( as the Scripture- phrafe pV NPJ imports) in fuch a way 5 that the Penal Sufferings are tranflated from the (inner him- felf- to his Sponfor. The Divine difpleafare did pals off from us, or elfe we could not have been par- doned or faved 5 and it did light upon Chrift, or el(e that Holy One could not have been made a - Curfe, which no meer Sufferings, if abltrafted from Divine Wrath, can amount unto. We fee here y there is difpleafure at the (in, and yet infinite love towards the (inner, in tranflating thepunifhment up-, on another. , 3. Gods Love is double, a Love of Complacence, which delights in the Creature, and a Love of Bene- volence, which defigns good to it. The firft takes/ pleafure in the Saints, who bear his holy Image. The fecond difFufes it felf to finners, who in themfelves. are worthy of Wrath. Hence the Apoftle .tells us, God 1 , — I- , , gfr ■ . 7$ Cods hove and Mercy Chap. 5. God commended his love towards us, in that while we ivere yet (inner s, Chrijl died fir us, Rom. 5. 8. Sinners are bbje&s of difpleafure, and yet Love breaks out towards them in that great inftance, the Death of Chrilt. If ever there were anger in God, 'twas at the Sin of a World 5 if ever there were Love in him, 'twas in the Gift of his Son. Thefe two may very well ftand together. 4. Man may be confidered, either as a Sinner, or as a Creature. A man who hath a rebellious Son, may be angry with him as rebellious, and yet com- panionate him as a Son. In like manner, God may be angry with us as Sinners, and yet love us as Crea- tures. Having removed the Soanian-CzvW, I {hall now proceed to fpeak of Gods Love, in giving his Son for us. Here I fhall diftindtly confider the given The Gift. The manner how it was given. The perfons for whom. The evil removed, and good procured by it, and the excellent Evangelical terms built upon it. Each one of thefe will illuftrate this Love in giving his Son for us. L The Giver is God himfelf, no other could do it. And here two things offer themfelves to us: The one is the earlinefs of his Love. It was no No- vel temporary thing, but ancient, nay eternal 5 up- on the Preference of the Fall he eternally defigned, that his Son fhould affume our Nature, and in it dye as an expiatory Sacrifice for us : Chrift was the Lamb foreordained before the foundation of the world^ 1 Pet. 1. 20. He w r as fet down for a Redeemer in the eternal Volumes before the world was up 5 and (lain above in Decree, long before he was flain be- low in the Manifejiation of Cbrifl. J 9 low in Time. A Plaiftcr was provided before the Chap. 5. wound, a Saviour before the Fall of Man. When v^^v^^ David would fet forth Gods Mercy in the higheft ftrain , He doth it thus, His mercy is from cvcrLift- ing to everlajling) Pfal. 103. 17. Such is his Love in Chrift, reaching, as I may fay, from one end of eternity to another : Each one of us may cry out, as that Ancient did, Sero te amavi, Domine, Lord, 'twas late e're I loved thee. Our love is but of yefterday, a temporary thing, but his was as early as eternity it (elf. The other is the freenefs of it. Love, as the Philo-*^* «N t2 fopher (peaks, wills good to another for his fake, ^^7inT^ not for our own. In that wonderful Gift of Chrift, far* »•>*- the Love was Gods, the profit ours. Mercy in ^***W man hath a kind of refpeft to the Donor : frail Hu- yjkdvfistfrift, manity, and the wheel of a mutable world tell him, Rb ' u 1 2t c - > That himfelf, the now giver, may peradventure come to be a receiver. Hence the Apoftle would have us remember them in adverfity, as being in the body, Heb. 13. 3, and reftore the lapfed, considering thy felf> Gal. 6. 1. It may be our own cafe. There is in fuch afts of Mercy, a kind of refpeft to our fu- ture felf, which poffibly may become an objeft for Mercy. But Mercy in God, which is the fuavity of his Eflence, iilues out in a pure gratuitous way 5 no (uch refpeft can fall upon him, who is immuta- ble and bleffed for ever. In the freene(s of hie Love, there are two things confiderable : On Gods part there was no want, on Mans no attraftive. On Gods part there was no want of us, or our Services 5 were there want with him, he could not be God; Could we fupply him 3 we (hould be greater » g Cods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. greater than himfelf in furnifhing him with that which he could not do for himfelf 5 He is All-fuf- ficient, and what want can be in him? Infinite, and what can be added to him ? An Ocean, though ~vaft, yet, becaufe finite, may receive an addition from a little drop. But what can be added to infi- nity,, which in its unmeafurable excellency com- prizes all things within it felf ? All -nations to him are but as ' the drop of the bucket, and as the fmall dufl of the ballance, Ifa.40. 15. Their Righteoufnefi can- not add one beam to his eflential Glory, neither can their iniquity in the leaft eclipfe it. However it be with the Creature, he is ftill himfelf. His own happinefs a fphere of all Perfeftions, a Theatre of Glory to himfelf. Hence it appears D that Gods Love in giving his Son for us, was not a Love of indi- gence, but of fulnefs and redundance, flowing out in a pure gratuitous manner towards us, that the honour might be his, and the profit ours. He gives like himfelf out of fuper-effluent goodnefs, as be- comes . one who is a Donor only, but no Re- ceiver. On Mans part there was no attractive, to move God to give his Son for us. Mans Love is ufually drawn out by fome excellency or other in the ob- jc6t : but what can draw out Gods ? Could the Origine of all goodnefs be attra&ed by any thing in the Creature ? Yet is it poffible that any thing fliould be found in a fallen Creature to attraft it ? Mans mifery was indeed the occafion, but what was the attractive ? Was our Love firit, and a charm to his? Oh! no} to fay, that a Creature is firfk in Love, is to blafpheme the Supreme Goodnefs, which fets 1 — . 1 in the Manifeflition of Cbriji. 8 1 fets up Love in it. The Apoftle is expref?, Herein Chap. 5. is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, l^^v*"**-f and Jent his Son to le the propitiation for our (ins, i John 4. 10. Between men, Love is ordinarily re- ciprocal 3 he that loves, is beloved again : but here ^j A ^» the Love was on one fide only. God loved his ve- Is-tv, 3 $/A«r, ry Enemies fo far, as to give his Son for them, to £ "''''^j*" raife up their Love to its great Original. Among Rbufi 2. c. 4. men an harmony of fpirits, a famenefs of tempers is a motive to Love. But what ? was there, could there be any fuch thing in fallen man as fiich ? How then was he fallen ? What need was there of a Sa- viour ? That holy Harmony was Mans Primitive re- clitude^ and whileft it lafted, there was no need of any reftorer. Alas ! fallen man was a very Chaos of corruption, his very rational Powers were depraved 5 there was flefh in his fpirit, enmity in his mind a- gainfl: him, who lighted up a pure Reafon in him at the firft. There was bondage in his Will, it could not 5 nay, fuch was its horrible perverfhefs, it would not elevate it (elf to the fountain of its liberty. Among men, goodnefs is an alleftive to Love : but what goodnefs was there in a fallen, degenerate Creature, full-fraught with fin, and oppofite to its Maker ? The very reliques of the Divine Image, which fin could not utterly expel out of the hu- mane Nature , were yet fo captivated and impri- foned there, that grofs Idolatry filled the world in fpight of all the notions of a Deity implanted in the hearts of men. We fee cleerly, there was no at- tractive on our part : Why then did Cod give his Son for us ? The only reafon was from himfelf, it was meer Grace, felf-moving Mercy, a pure emana- M tion g 2 Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. tion of Love towards us unworthy Creatures, who might have been made the obje&s of his Wrath and that for ever. 2 The next thing confiderable is the Gift it felf, and that was the Son of Cod, very God } a greater, a dearer perfon could not be given 5 if we meafure Gods Love by the Gift, it is like that, altogether unmeafurable. Hence the Apoftle tells us' That there is a breadth, and length, and depth, and height, infinite dimensions in it, fitch as pafi the knowledg of men and angels, Eph. 3. 18, 19. When God gave us the Creatures for our ufe, he gave us but the drops and models of his Goodnefs : but when he gave his Son for us, he gave himfelf 5 God was the Giver, and God the Gift. When God could fwear by no great- er, he fware by himfelf } when he could give no greater, he gave himfelf. Here was Love afted to the uttermoft, elevated to the higheft point 5 a great- er Gift there could not be. 'Twas great Love in Jonathan to David, that for him he would ftrip himfelf of his Robe, nay, and venture the caft of a Javelin from an angry Father. But what manner of Love was it in God, that he would (trip him- felf of his Orient pearl 5 that he would give his Son, his eternal Joy out of his bofom, to affume an hu- mane Nature , and in it to bear the horrible ftroke of Juftice, which was due to us for our iniquities ? In giving Laws and Promifes, God gives but a crea- ted Image of his Sanftity and Grace 5 but in giving his Son, he gave his effential increated Image to fuf- fer in the flefli for us, that his holy Image, broken in the fall, might be repaired again in us. When we were off from God, the Center of Souls, and wan- in the Manifejiation of Chrijl. 8 3 wandring in the foul ways of fin, God out of Chap. 5 his immenfe Love, fent no left perfon than his only begotten Son to leek us, and bring us back unto himfelf, that we might be for ever happy in the fruition of him. ? . The greatneft of this Love will yet further ap- pear, if we confider the manner how the Son of Cod was given for us. The lower a man ftoops and condefcends to do another good, the higher and more eminent is his Love 5 the fteps wherein the Son of Cod came down and humbled himfelf for us, evidently declare the infinite height of that Love, which made him ftoop fo low to compafs our Sal- vation. The firft ftep was his Incarnation, the word was made flefh 5 he, who was in the form of God, took on him an humane Nature. In the Creation infinite produced finite , but here infinite affumed finite 5 there Eternal brought forth Tem- poral, but here Eternal took Temporal into it felf : and what a wonderful Condefcenfion was this ? It's true, Reafon in the Sociman laughs at it, but Faith in the Chriftian muft needs admire it. Had the greateft Monarch on Earth confined himfelf to the pooreft Cottage there, it would have been nothing to Cod Tabernacling in the flefh. Should the high- eft Angel in Heaven have put off his Perfections, and come down into an humane Nature } and from thence have pafled into a brutal beftial one, and fo on into a tree or ftone, and at laft into nullity ^ it would not have been a Condefcenfion comparable to that of the Son of God coming in the flefh. His Sacred Perfon was infinitely more above humane Nature, than an Angel is above matter or nullity it M 2 felf: 8 4 Cods hove and Mercy Chap. 5. felf : an d what unparallel'd Love was here? The \^0^^^j Creator became a Creature 5 the Son of Cod afTumed our nature, and that after it was in us tainted with At'tributef^ firu " The natural diftance C faith that excellent foi. 171. cc Man) between God and the Creature is infinite $ " the Moral between God and the finful Creature, if u poffible, is more than infinite. Yet the mercy of a our Redeemer overcame this diftance. What an " extafie of Love tranfported the Son of God fo far, " as to efpoufe our nature, after it was defiled and "debated with fin? He was effential Innocence and u Purity 5 yet he came in the fimilitude of finful flefh, cc which to outward view was not different from " what was really finful. Thus he. St. Anftin calls Love, jun&ura duo copulans, a coupling of two to- gether : That after man had rent off himfelf from God by his Apoftacy , God fhould afTume an hu- mane Nature into himfelf, to make up the breach^ and reduce Man into an Union with himfelf again, Miw v?um in mu ^ nee ^s be Love in a tranfcendent excefs infinite. utero yirginis : This made St. Cyprian overlook the wonders in Na* miror omnipo- ture ^ t ^ t he might ravifh himfelf in the admirations I'HiiT: in miror ' of an Incarnate God. The Condefcenfion was here qmmodo verfo fo great, that God feems to negleft his ownMajefty, filit[ a cy^dl that he ma Y comply with our neceffities 3 yet infi- Nac' chrifii. nite Love would have the Son of God ftoop a little lower, and do honour to that Sacred Law which we had violated. His humane Nature being an inmate in his infinite Perfbn, could not but have a right to Heaven , and might have been immediately rapt up thither 5 but Love fet him another task. He, the great Lawgiver, was made under the Law : He, who knew the Father in an infinity of light, now- knew in the Manifeftation of Chriji. 85 knew him in a finite Reafon : He who embraced Chap. 5. the Father in an infinity of Love, now loved him in a finite Will : He, who was Lord of all, was fub- jefl: to Parents and Magiftrates : He, who upholds the world, "went up and down as a man doing of good 5 he ftooped as low as the Ceremonial Law : His pure flefh was circumcifed, he kept the Pafieover, and (b obcdientially ftood under his own fhadow. This is a Condefcenfion much greater, than if all the Angels in Heaven had put themfelves under the Laws of the lowelt matter 5 yet infinite Love would have the Son of God go down a little lower. We have him hungry, thirfty, weary, weeping, differing the contradiction of Sinners, enduring the tempta- tions of Satan, all his life- through a man of for- rows : at lad we have him bleeding on a Croft, hang- ing there as a fpe&acle of fhame 5 his hands and 'his feet were pierced, his body was racked and tortu- red to death in a ftinking Golgotha. But, which was the greateft of all, he bore the Wrath of God : and what was that Wrath, which was due to the fin of a World ? or what thofe Sufferings, which fatisfied Juftice for it ? What a great thing was the Paffion of God ? and how much beyond the diflolution of a World? Words cannot utter it, thoughts cannot mcaiiire it. That Love muft be no left than immen(e r which made the Son of God (loop fo low, to take us* up out of the ruins of the Fall. 4*TheLoveof God will yet more appear, if we take notice of the perfons for whom Chrift was given ; it was for man, poor impotent man, a crea- ture worth nothing, a bankrupt in Spirituals, one> void of all thole Primitive Excellencies, which at firft $6 Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. firft Crowned the humane Nature 5 for him it was, u-— v— o that God was at fo vaft an expence, as that of his spond. Annul, own blood. Twas great Charity in Paulinus , Anno 431. Bifhop of Nola 9 that he would give himfelf in pawn to the Vandals for a poor Child 5 but it was tranf- cendent fuperlative Love in God, to give his Son, one worth Millions of Worlds, and as rich in Ex- cellencies as a Deity could make him, to be emptied and humbled to death for poor worthlefi worms, fuch as we are. Te krww the grace of our Lord Jefus Chriji, that though he was rich , yet for our fakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich, faith the Apoftle, 2 Cor. 8. 9. The Riches of a God were laid out to fet up broken man again. But fur- ther , it was for Sinners, for Enemies, fuch as were in Arms againft God 3 fuch as had broken his Laws, defpifed his Authority, caft off his Soveraignty, and as much as in them lay, ftained his Glory. Thefe were the perfons, upon whofc Salvation infinite Love fet fo high a rate , that rather than fail, the Life of God ftiould be paid down for it. The Apoftle notably fets forth this, Scarcely for a righteous man will one dye , yet peradventure for a good man fome would even dare to dye : But God commended his love towards us, in that while we were yet fitters, Chrifi died for us, Rom. 5.7,8. Sometimes poffibly, though but rarely, one may dye for a righteous good Man, who is a bledirg to the place where he lives. But this was Chrifts Prerogative to dye for Sinners : this was the fupereminency of Divine Love to give him fo to do. Greater love hath no man than this , that a man lay down his life for his friends, Joh. 15. 13* Thus our Saviour. A greater proof or effecl in the Manifeflation of Chriji. 87 effeft of Love than death there cannot be 5 but Chap. 5, Love is then in an higher and more excellent degree, when that death is, as in our Saviours cafe it was , for Enemies, than it is, when the death is for Friends. Damon and Pythias ^ two intim.ite friends, were wil- ling to dye one for another 3 but Chrift died for Enemies. In Creation God overcame Nullity, but in ^_ Redemption he overcomes Enmity it felf, and that in a wonderful way : He afTumes an humane Nature, and in it pours out his precious blood, to melt and break that horrible Enmity, which was in us againft him. $". If we would (ee more of this Love, let us turn our eyes upon the evils removed, and the good procured by our Saviour Chrift. All evils are either Moral, fuch as fin 3 or which waits upon the other, Phyfical, fuch as punifhment : all of them are removed by our Saviour, who faves from Sin and Wrath. Man was under the guilt of Sin, and fo under the Wrath of God. Wrath in the threatning hung as an horrible Tempeft over his head, and within there was the dreadful Eccho of it in Conference. But the Sufferings of Chrift were fo fatisfa&ory and meritorious for us, that as foon as we return and believe on him, all our guilt is done away, It's true, the guilt in it felf, in the intrinfecal defert of punifhment, is perpetual, becaufe fin cannot ceafe to be fin 5 but it doth no longer re- dound upon our perfbns, to oblige us to punifh- ment. The heavy burden is now lifted off from Confcience, the black Cloud of Wrath is diffolved, the curfing Law hath nothing to fay againft us 5 There u no condemnation to them which are in Chrift^ Rom, 88 Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. Rom. 8. 1. It's true, affii&ions may fall upon a Be- liever, but there is no Condemnation, there is not a jot of Wrath in them 5 they are rather Caftigatory than Penal, managed in the hand of Mercy, rather than Juftice. In the iffue it appears, that there was Love and Faithfulnels in them, that even in thofe affii&ing paths, Mercy and Truth are found : all things (hall work together for good unto the Be- liever, Affii&ions and all. Thefe ferve for excellent purpofes, to fan off his Vanity, melt away his Cor- ruption, alarm his fpiritual Watch, refine his golden Graces, call: him into the Image of a meek fufFering Chrifr, unearth, unfelf him, and elevate his affecti- ons towards the everlafting reft which is above. Af- fliction, after it hath budded and bloiTomcd with fuch precious fruits, is no longer evil, but an excel- lent good. It's true alfo, that death Temporal will feize upon him, but the curfe is gone, the fting out 3 death, which at firft was a punishment, now hath a bleffing in it. It was Originally introduced by fin $ but through the admirable Grace of our Saviour it carries away thofe reliques of fin, which no Tears, Prayers, Watchings, Pious endeavours could utterly extirpate, whileft we are in the body : it throws down the earthen walls into their mother-duft. But who would not dye, and with Hrtarwn bid his Soul, Go out, that he might be rid of fin? There is in- deed a paffage out of a Temporal life, but it is into an Eternal one. The foul, when it leaves its old friend the body, flies into the blelTed Region, there to enjoy God in an immediate manner 5 to read truth in its Original, and tafte goodnefs in the Foun- tain: the body, which at prefent diflolves intoduft, (hall in the Manifeflation of Chriji. 89 fhall wake again, and be made like to the glorious Chap. 5, body of Chrift. Mortal (hall put on immortality, corruptible incorruption, death (ball be fwallowed up in victory 5 it is no longer an evil to the Be- liever. Again, Man was under the Power of Sin, and fo under the Tyranny of Satan. Sin was a Lord, a Ruler over him 5 not only over his outward man, whofe members were the weapons of it, but over the inward too. It had ftrong-holds in his Reafon, and a throne in his Will 5 he was a drudg, a (lave to his lufts, hurried up and down by one Corrup- tion or other 5 wandring in error, or fwelling in pride, or pining in envy, or boiling in malice, or burning in luft, or drowning in fenfual pleafures, fome way or other ferving his Iniquity. Satan, the Ruler of darknefs, hath a Palace in his heart, and keeps pofleffion there 5 upon all occafions he blows up Original Corruption into finful motions, motions into confents, contents into ads, ads into habits. Thus he carries on the (inner in a circle of finning, till inevitable ruin overtake him } but in and through Chrift there is deliverance from this horrible fervitude.The Holy Spirit comes and refcues the (inner 5 it opens his eyes to fee himfclf (bnding, as he doth, at the brink of Hell and Death 5 it melts him into tears and godly forrows for fin 5 it breaks down the ftrong-holds and throne of fin in the heart 5 it cafts out Satan and the hellifti furniture } ir tranf- lates the poor (inner from the power of darknefs, into the Kingdom of Chrift , into . Region of Grace and Power, where Sin and Satan < Mnot have the Viftory. Thofe precious Promifes, that fin (hall N not po Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. not have Dominion, that Satan fhall be bruifed un- der our feet, are now fealed and experimented in the heart. The poor Captive is now brought out of Bondage, into the true liberty of Holinels and Obedience. Here we fee the matchlefs incompara- ble Love of God, which delivered us from fo many great Evils. Hezekiah being refcued from Death, made his acknowledgments: Lord, thou haft in love to my foul delivered me from the pit of corrup- tion : or, as the Original hath it, Thou haft loved my foul from the pit of corruption. Every Believer, who hath tafted of the great Salvation, may fay, Lord, thou haft loved me from Sin, Sat an ', Death, Hell, by • delivering me from all theft evils. 6* Moreover, as all evils were removed, fo all good things were procured by Chrift. Temporals were fo, the world owes its ftanding to him. Juftice, but for his expiatory Sacrifice, would have dafhed fd it down about the finners /years. Sin, but for the LciAiS Cement of his blood, would have unframed all things in nature : that right to the Creature, which we forfeited by our iniquity, was reftored again by his Merits. The Believer (hall now have fo much of the world, as infinite Wifdom and Mercy ("more competent Judges than humane Reafon and Will ), (hall think a fit portion for him 5 and what he hath, he {hall have with the Love of God , which, as it is the higheft fuavity in it felf, fo it pours out a de- licious relifh into all outward things. Spirituals were fo 3 thofe initial Graces of Faith and Repen- tance, which introduce us into an Union with Chrift, are from him. He is a Prince and Saviour ■&o give repentance^ A&s 5. 3 1. To you it is given in the in the Manifeflation of Chriji. pi ike Ictalf of Chriji to heheve on him, Phil. I. 29. Chap. 5, As foon as we repent and believe, we are juftified in his blood, and by a conjunction with him the na- tural Son , we have power and right to become the Sons of God by Adoption and Grace. The Holy Spirit, the fountain of Graces and Comforts, which was upon him the head above mcafure, will fall down upon us his Members in a proportion 5 every Grace, every piece of the glorious new-creature is created in him. In the power of his Merits and Spirit, every comfort, every beam of Divine Favour comes down to us through him. He is the true Mercy-feat, where God meets and communes in words of Grace with us. Eternals were fo too 5 all the weights of Glory, and Crowns of life in Hea- ven, were purchafed by him. His blood opens the Holy of Holies, the pure River of life fprings out of his Merits, the gift of God is eternal life through Jefus Chriji, Rom. 6. 28. Had it not been for him, we could never have entrqd into fuch a blelTed Re- gion as Heaven. What a feift is Chrifl:, which vir- tually contains all gifts and good things in him ! How incomparable that Love, which gave us fo compre- henfive a Gift ! "?- In the lafl: place let us confider the excellent Evangelical Terms, which were founded on the Death of Chrifl:. Here two things are considera- ble. The one is this, The terms are eafier. The Cove- nant of Works was, Do this and live : The Cove- nant of Grace is, Believe, recent, and live. The firft called for pure, finlefi, perfect obedience : The laft ftoops and condelcends to fallen man 3 it accepts of N 2 fincere, p2 Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. fincere, though imperfect obedience; uprightnefs paffes for perfection , the main of the heart for all of it: the will, is accepted for the work, pure aims are taken for compleat performances, in- firmities are covered with indulgence, duties are taken into the hand of a Mediator, and perfumed with his infinite Merits 5 and hence they are accep- table, and as fweet Odours to God. O how low doth infinite Love and Mercy (loop to poor finners ! It will fave a repenting believing finner , and how can it poffibly go lower ? That God (hould juftifie an impenitent unbelieving finner, is utterly impoffi- ble to his Holinels , unlefs he would open a gap to all fin and wickednefs, and make it capable to have a Crown of happinefi at laft. He could not more condefcend, than he hath done in the terms of the Goipel : there is a Kingdom for the poor in fpirit, a Comfort for the mourners, an acceptance for a wil- ling mind, a favourable refpccl: for the leaft fpark of grace, which is latent in adefire, and but as a little fmoke, or wiek in the focket ( as the expreflion is, Matth. 12. 20.) And what condefcending Love is here ? How could God ftoop lower for the Salva- tion of Men ? The other is this, The terms are farer. It's true, Adam, had he ftood in Right eoufnefs, would have had a reward. But the difference is this , Under the firft Covenant it was not certain, that Adam, though he had fufEcient grace, ftiould itand 5 but under the fecond it is as furc, as Gods Truth and Faithfulnefe in the promile can make it, that a people (hall be gathered up out of the corrupt Ma{s of mankind 5 that Chrift (hall have a repenting believing feed , and in theManifefiation of Chrift. p and that they (hall abide and perfevcre till they Chap. 5. come to the recompence of reward in Heaven. St. At/- **^-v~~*J (tin diftinguifhes of a double adjutorium gratify or De cmeft. & help of grace. Aclim had that grace, without Grat ' cap * I2 ' which he could not have obeyed 5 Gods People have that, which caufcs them to obey. The firft gave him zpofje, a power to obey and perfevere : The fecond gives us the very velle & perficere, the very willing and working with perfeverance. Here- upon he obferves, that Adams will, though (bund and without fpot, did not perfevcre in an ampler good, whileft our will, though weak and infe&ed with indwelling Corruption, doth perfevere in a leffer. Adam, with all his Holinefs fell before an Apple, a little titillation of plcafiire 5 but the Chri- ftian Martyrs have flood it out, notwithstanding the rcliques of fin in them, againft racks and tor- ments. Under the firit Covenant the ftock of Grace was in Mans own hand, the ftrefs h) upon his Will 5 the principle of Holinefs in him was fubjefted to it, to be continued or rorfeked. But under the fecond Covenant, which was founded at fb vaft an expence as the Blood of God, Mans Will is not made Truftee a fecond time, the ftock is not in his own hand :, Grace is a Viftor, and fubdues the Will unto it felf. Hence this Covenant cannot, as the other did, mifcarry : God was a friend to innocent Adam 5 but in the fecond Covenant God comes nearer to us in a double Union, fuch as Adam never dreamt of. There is an Hypoftatical Union, the Son of God taking our nature into himfelf, and, which is founded thereon , $ a Myftical Union, Believers being in a wonderful manner united unto Chrift, as members unto 9 a Gods Love and Mercy Chap. 5. unto their head. In the firft Union of the Divine and Humane Nature in Chrift, there is one Perfon. In the fecond, Chrift and Believers make one Chrift, 1 Cor. 12. 12. Believers are but Chrift difplayed : he lives in them, he counts himlelf incomplete with- out them. By virtue of thefe two Unions it is, that Believers finally perfevere 3 Becaufe I Uve ( faith Chrift) ye ft) all live alfo, John 14. 19. Their life is bound up in his 5 as long as Chrift the head is alive above , the believing Members below (hall not fail of quickning grace, to maintain ipiritual life unto eternal. The Holy Spirit is in them a well of water, springing up to everlafting life, John 4. 14^ and to lecure the abode of the Spirit with them, Chrift is a Pried: after the power of an endlefs life, Heb. 7. 16. In the Covenant of Works, there was no promife of perfeverance 5 but in the Covenant of Grace there are many fuch promifes : Godftjali confirm you unto the end, 1 Cor. 1.8. He will put his fear in their hearts, that they fid all not depart from him, Jer. 32.40. The Apoftle praying for the Thejjalonians, that they may be preferred blamdefs unto the coming of Chrift, immediately adds, Faithful is he that called you, who alfo will do it, i Thef 5.23,24 5 evidently God un- dertakes it, and engages his Faithfulnefs in it. To take thefe Promifes conditionally, is utterly to eva- cuate them 3 to make them run thus, If we will per- fevere, we (hall perfevere 5 and fo much was true under the old Covenant, and without any Promife at all. The clear fcope of thofe Promife is, That Be- lievers are not left in their own hand, but kept in Gods 5 and how fure an hand that is, our Saviour tells us, None can plucky them out of my Fathers hand^ in the Manifeftation of Cbriji. if we efteem him above Worlds and Creatures, we will al- low his Will to be above all Wills, and fubjeft ours to it. Moreover the Love of God moves us to love our Neighbour. What ? hath God gone before us in fuch admirable fteps of Love ? and (hall we not be fol- lowers of him as dear children, and really in love, as the Apoftle (peaks, Eph. 5. 1, 2 ? Can there be an higher or nobler pattern than Love it (elf? Shall he do good in the fphere of Nature, and more and higher good in the (phere of Grace, and we do none in our little fphere ) Shall infinite Bowels and Mercies be open,and finite ones (hut ? When God hath given fo great a Gift as his own Son, May we withhold our little Pit- tances of Charity > Would we receive all, and give O no- 98 Gods Love and Mercy , &c. Chap. 5* nothing ? Exaft pence from our Brother, when Ta- lents are forgiven to our felves ? Is God come into our flefh ? and (hall we hide our felves from it, I mean, in the negleft or contempt of the poor ? Did he take humanity, that we {hould put it off? No, in fb doing we ftiould reproach not our Maker only, but our Redeemer too. Inhumanity is now double, treble, to what it was before our Saviour took an humane Nature, to read us a Lecture of Love and Goodnefs in : the old Commandment of Love is now a new one, urged upon us by a new Motive , The incomparable Love of God in his giving his Son for us. If we now fhut up our Bowels and Mercies from others, how dwelleth the Love of God in us ? What ftnfe can we have of it upon our hearts ? Charity was the badg of the Primitive Chriftians. The im- prefs of Gods Love upon Mr. Fox was (b great, that he never denied any that asked for Jefus fake. Our Love towards men (hould be a little pifture or re- femblance of Gods Love towards us. Our Mercies and Compaffions (hould tell the world, that we have tafted of that infinite Grace and Mercy which is above. Our Charity towards all (hould bear witnefs,that we have been great receivers from God. Our Love to- wards Enemies (hould be a thankful acknowledgment, that v/e being fuch, were reconciled to God by the Death of his Son. CHAP, 99 ■ ■ i ■ ' ' ... » Chap. 6. CHAP. VI. The Power of God manifeft in Chrift. In his Incar- nation and Conception, in his Abrades. Thefe were true in the Hiftory. True in the Nature of Miracles. They were numerous and great. They were juited to the Evangelical defign. Divine Power manifeft in converting the World ; notwith (landing its deep Cor- ruption, and the opposition of Potentates and. Philo- fophers to the Go/pel. The inflruments mean, that the Power might be of God. The Gofpel propofes fuper- rational Alyfteries, fuper- moral Virtues, fuper -mun- dane rewards $ things fo much above us, that with- out a Divine Power the propofal would have been fruitlefs. IN the next place I come to confider the Power of God. Power being a Perfe&ion, muft needs be in him, and being ( as all other Attributes zvc) his very Eflence, it muft needs be infinite. The very light of Nature reveals this Attribute. In the Grecian Philofophers he is called vr&vTOK&fas, Omnipotent 5 Nihil eft, quod Deus efficere non pofjet, faith Tully. Ludovicus Vives wonders, that fo learned a Man as commm. h Pliny (hould cavil at Gods Omnipotence, as if he Au s- de ch could not do all things, becaufe he could not dye. 1 ' 5 ' c * IC In Scripture he is called Gibbor, a mighty one ^Shaddai^ an All-fufficient God : he is the only Potentate, 1 Tim. 6. 15. He can do every thing, Job 42. 2. Nothing is too hard for him, Gen. 18.14. Power belongeth to him, PfaL 62.11. Whatever is an aft of Power, O 2 that ioo The Power of God Chap. 6. that he can do 5 that he cannot do contradictories, is not Impotency, but Power and Perfection : for him to lye, were to deny his own Truth 5 for him to dye, were to caft off his Immortality 5 for him to make a thing be, and at the fame inftant to make it not to be^ were to aft repugnantly, and overturn his own aftion. Thefe argue Impotency, not Pow- er. We may more properly (ay, that thefe cannot be done, than that God cannot do them : he can do all things, which being done, do argue Power or Perfection } but what argues Impotency, can no more fall upon him, than darknefs can feize upon the Sun. This excellent Attribute of Power was eminently fet forth in Chrift : He is called the power of God^ 1 Cor. 1. 24. Divine Power (hews forth it felf in him in (everal rcfpefts. Firft it breaks out in his Incarnation. The word Teas made flejh^ John 1.14. He, who was in the firm of God, took^ upon him the form of a fervant^ Phil. 2. 6, 7 5 that is, he, who had the EfTence and Majefty of God, aflumed fo low a thing as an humane Na- ture : He did not lay down his Deity, but aflumed an Humanity 3 two Natures, a Divine and Humane, were in one perfon, Never did God come fo near the Creature as here. He was in the world by his Univerfal Pretence 5 he was in the Temple in types and fymbols 5 in the Saints he is by his Grace, in Heaven he is in immediate Glory : but in the Incar- nation he is hypoftatically in an humane Nature. The perfon of the Word, which was from Eternity an Hypoftafis to his Divine Nature, became an Hy- poftafis to his humane Nature in time. O what won- ders in the Manifefiation of Chrijl. iol ders of Power are here ! Here God was made Man, Chap. 6. the Creator became one with his Creature ! Had the c^-v**«i whole world been crowded into a tingle Atom, it would have been infinitely a lefs wonder than this 5 the putting a greater finite into a lefi, cannot be comparable to the taking of finite into infinite. Here are two Natures, a Divine and an Humane, in themfelvcs infinitely diftant, met in perlbnal con- junction 5 finite is not abforp't by infinite, infinite is not changed by finite. Here Eternal dwells in the fame perfon with Temporal, yet runs not into fuc- Ceffion } immortal dwells with mortal, yet falls not into paflion. Here an humane Nature is united to a perfon infinitely fimple, and infinitely compleat - y yet he lofes not hisfimplicity,nor yet doth he receive any additional perfection. Here's an humane Nature without any Pcrfonality of its own. Naturally the humane Nature of Chrift would have had a Sublic- ence of its own 5 a Perfonality would have flown from it : but the refultance was miraculoufly pre- vented 5 the v/ant of its own finite Subfiftence was fupplied by the Prefence of an infinite one j the Son Mr. Jeans of of God communicated his Hypoftafis to it, to fuftain the words in- it. Here we have in fome refpeft more of Divine carn * ' ol '* 1 * Power manifefted, than there was in the making of the World. When meer nothing was by an Almighty word elevated into Elements, Plants, Beafts, Men,. Angels, ftill it was but into finite 5 but here a finite humane Nature was taken into infinite : and betweea the infinite God and the humane Nature, the difpa- \ rity muft be far greater than it is between a world and nothing. Here indeed God did not create an infinite (that being impoffiblej, but he came as near 1 02 The Forver of God Chap. 6. near it as poffibly could be, by affuming a finite Na- ture into himfelf. All other Creatures are compara- tively extra Deum 5 but here" the humane Nature was in the very inftant of its produ&ion, interwo- ven with the infinite Perfbn of the Son. Thus we fee, that in this ftupendious work, Divine Power afted magnificently and eongruoufly to its own in- finity 5 never any work did fo fully anfwer and cor- refpond to Omnipotence as this. A {econd inftance of Power we have in the Con- ception of our Saviour : his body was not formed in an ordinary way, by the concurrence of Man and Woman , but in a way fuper-natural 5 A Virgin was with Child. As the body of the firft Adam was wonderfully framed out of the duft 5 fbthe body of the (econd was admirably framed out of the Virgin. That a Virgin fhould be with Child, was a great, an high Miracle, far above all the Power of Nature. How then was it efFefted ? The Evangelift tells us, The Holy Ghofi came upon her the power of the higkeft did overjhadow her Luk. I. 35. This is a (ublime tremendous Myftery 5 the Holy Ghoft, as the word ( overjludow ) imports, did, as it were, caft a Cloud over her 5 to teach us, that we fhould not over-cu- rioufly pry into fo great a Work as this was. The body of our Saviour was not produced fpermatically, out of the fubftance of the Holy Ghoft , but Opera- tively, by the Power of it. The matter of his bo- dy was from the fubltance of the Virgin 5 the a&ive Principle was the infinite Spirit. The feed of Man was not here ufed 5 it was not congruous, that he, who had God for his Father, (hould have any Man to be fo : it was a miraculous extraordinary opera- tion. in the Manifejiation of Chriji. 103 tion. Hence Chrift is called, The fione cut out 0/Chap. 6. tie mountains without hands , Dan- 2. 54. There was an Almighty Power in the framing his humane Nature:, the Tabernacle of his body was not pitched by Man, but by the Lord, Heb. 8. 2. There was a fupernatural operation in the making of it 3 it is called a tabernacle not made with hands , that is to fay, not of this building, Heb. 9. 11. It was not made in a natural ordinary way of generation. It's true, he took part of our flefti and blood 5 but the manner of framing his body was in an extraordinary way, the ftru&ure of it was Divine, and much above that of our bodies. Another inftance of the Divine Power we have in the Miracles wrought by Jefus Chrift. The Jewifb Rabbins diftinguifh of a twofold Work of God 5 they call his ordinary Works of Nature, opus Bcre- fiith, from the firft words of Genefis 5 and his mi- raculous works, opus Merchebha, from Ezekiels Cha- riot. A miracle is a work lifted up above the Order and Power of Nature : it is a fpecimen of Creation, fomcthing is made out of nothing. What fecond caufcs cannot reach, that is done by the firft 5 no Man, no Angel can do fuch a work. Thefe are but parts of Nature, and therefore cannot in their Ope- rations exceed Nature 5 Quod cji totaliter fub ordine ccnflitutum, non potcfl ultra ijlim nature or din em agere 5 it is only Gods Prerogative to work Miracles. He that fet the order of Nature, can work above it 5 he can lift Nature off the hinges, and fet it on again; and when he doth it, he doth it as becomes his infi- nite Wifdom , upon very great and weighty Rea- fbns. When he brought his People out of Egypt, then 1 04 The Power of God Chap. 6. then his wonders appeared 3 when he delivered his Law on Sinai ; 3 his wonders appeared again. In thofe great difpenfations he (hewed himfelf, not in the or- dinary drefs of Nature, but in Royal State and Ma- jefty 5 much more did he do fo, when his Son 5 very Cod, was manifefted in the flefti. Then the water was turned into Wine, the Wind and the Seas did obeyfance to their incarnate Creator : the blind re- ceived their fight, the lame did walk, the Lepers were deanfed, the deaf did hear, the dead were raifed, the devils were caft out of Men. Here the right hand of the Lord was glorious in Power. Na- ture did, as it were, leap and triumph in miraculous elevations above it felf, at the coming down of its Creator, to redeem the world : a mighty train of wonders attended on that greateft wonder of all , Cod incarnate 5 a life of Miracles enfued upon his miraculous Conception. Now touching the Miracles of Chrift, there are three or four things to be taken notice of. 1. The Miracles of Chrift were true, and that up- on a double account. The one is this, They were true in the Hiftory of them, they were really done : we have them upon Record in the Sacred Volume of Scripture - they were not done in a corner, or before a few, but openly, and before multitudes 5 there were thou- fands of eye-witnefleg, from whom the truth of them hath been handed down in all ages of the Church. There is no colour at all to imagine, that thofe firft reporters did utter an untruth, or go a- bout to put a cheat upon the world : their own inte- grity would not fuffer it, neither was the thing it felf in the Manif elation ofChrifl. 105 felf indeed pra&icable. How (hould fo many thou- Chap. 6. (ands, for the mod part unknown to, and diftant l******** from each other, ever agree and confpire together in the very fame ftory ? Or, if they could, what (hould they propofc to themfelves ? or which way could they think, that a Relation of things to have been done openly, if falfe, (hould ever pafi in a con- tradicting World ? They knew very well, that there were innumerable prying malicious Enemies round about them, who would perfecute them for that Re- lation, though true, and brand them as lyars for it, if falfe. Chriftianity was then a poor perfecuted. thing, and it would have been ftrange folly and madnefs in them, to have ventured their lives and cftates meerly to broach a lye unto the world} efpe- cially feeing it muft have been fuch an one, as would have been furely difcovered to be fuch, and fevere- ly punifhed upon the Authors. In all reafbn there- fore, what the firft Witneffes fpake was true 5 and what after-ages heard, was but the Eccho of 'their report. The Miracles wrought by our Saviour were fo great, that none of the Adverfaries ever durft deny, that they were done. The Jews did not de- ny it: their ancient Rabbins take thofe words of p. Gal. de Arc* the Prophet , Then the eyes of the blind fiall be *• 8 - c *• opened, and the ears of the deaf Jhall be unjlopped : the la we ft all leap as the hart, and the tongue of the dumb jl)all Jing, Ifa. 35. 5,6. to be fpoken of the MeJJiah. Their own Jofephns fpeaks of Jefus as one more than a man, and a worker of great Miracles $ only the Jews, out of their defperate malice againft our Saviour, defamed his Miracles as done by Ma- gick: and, as Dr. Light foot tells us, it is (aid in Taint, nam. fol. 30. P Bab. io5 The Power of God Chap. 6, Bab. that Ben Sarda ( which is a blafphemous name {**-V*J they give to Jefus of Nazareth ) did bring inchant- ments out of Egypt in incifion in his flefh. But there cannot be a vainer thought than to imagine, that Satan fhould contribute wonders to confirm that Do&rine, which he knew would utterly ruin his Kingdom. When the Pharifees faid, that Chrift did caft out Devils by Beelzebub. He anfwered two things : Firft,that Satans Kingdom, if divided, could not (land, Matth. 12. 26. And then, that they, in faying fo, did malicioully oppofe their light, and run into the unpardonable fin, ^cr/31, 32. But when the Jews faw that this pretence would not ferve their turn, they betook themlelves to a con- trary (hift, and (aid, That the Mejjiah, when he came, fhould do no Miracles at all. The Pagans did not deny Chrifts Miracles. In Pilates Letter to the Emperor Tiberius, there is an enumeration Maid. Hift. mac le of his Miracles. In the Epiftle of Lentulus to cent. 1. l.i. Tiberius he is ftiled, Homo magna virtutk. The Pa- c. 10. guns, confcious to themfelves that the thing was not Aug. de conjen- to be denied, cryed up JEfcnlapim and Apollonius^ fusvang. 1 1. j n oppofition to Chrift 5 and withal framed an im- pudent lye, that our Saviour had Magical Books, ac- cording to which he did his Miracles. Such de- vices as thefe, were, I fuppofe, firft ftarted by jf«- lian the Apoftate, and by him inftilled into others. The Mahometans, fairer than the other, confefs Chrifts Miracles to have been done, and that from Mom. de Vtu God. Their Alcoran faith, That Gods Spirit was a chrift. Raig. help an j w i tne fi to Jefus, that the Soul of God was given to him. Thus it appears on all hands, that the matter of Faft touching our Saviours Mi- r-acles D cannot be denied* The in the Manifejlation ofChriji. \oy The other is this, They were true for the nature Chap. 6, of Miracles: they were not, as the Devils wonders are, meer Speftrurns or Apparitions, but real Mira- cles, things which are above the order of Nature, and lye within the line of Omnipotence only 5 the matter, mode, and end fignally declare them to be fuch. Some Miracles of Chrift, fuch as railing the dead, were fuch for the matter of them , that no corratits of nature, no concurrence or conjun&ion of created Powers could ever have cfFc&ed them, no, not in Millions of Ages 5 fome of them, fuch as Curing the fick, Nature might have done , but in a trad of time, and with the help of (econd Caufes. But our Saviour difpatched them out of hand in- ftantly, immediately, with a word or a touch: To operate after this fort, is only proper to God, who is excellent in working. When Satan, who labours to emulate Divine Works, doth wonders, the end of them declares their Original s fuitably to the Author they (erve only to lead men into lies and Idolatries. Antichrift comes with lying wonders , 2 Thef 2. 9. Lying wonders in themlelves, as being phantafms and mockeries of fen(e$and lying wonders, as tending to confirm men in falfe Doftrine and Worfhip : but the Miracles of Chrift, being real ones, were done to ratifie the fuper-natural Truths and pure Worfhip of God. The Jews have a rule, that we fhould believe him who doth Miracles, un- lets he be the Author of Idolatrous Worfhip : had they adhered to this rule, $hey. could not but have embraced our Saviour, who with (6 many Mira- cles fealed up the true Do&rine and Worfhip of God. P 2 2. The lo8 The Power of God Chap. 6. 2. The Miracles of Chrift were not a few, but very numerous 5 not in one or two places, but dif- fufed over the Creation, thereby to proclaim that the Creator was come down to redeem the World. There were Miracles upon the Water, he turned it into Wine, John 2. 9. Shewing himfelf to be the Lord of Nature 5 here doing that in an inftant, which he doth every year in the Vine : Miracles in the Sea, a fi(h brings him the tribute-money, Matth. 17. 27. to declare, that all Creatures were Tribu- taries to him. After an whole nights toil to no pur- pofe , the Net being let down at his word, enclofed a great multitude of fifies, Luk. 5. 5,6. So that the awe of his Divine Power fell upon all the Spe&ators* Miracles upon the Sea and Air together 5 in a Tem- ped he rebukgd the winds and the Sea, and there was a great calm, Matth. 8. 26, as a proof that all the Elements were his fervants. Miracles upon the loaves, in multiplying of them, John 6. 1 1 , and upon the fig-tree, in mating it to wither away, Matth. 21. 195 as a clear demonstration, that his bleffing and curfe were great things. Miracles upon the bodies of men, in healing all manner of fickpefs and difeafe, Matth. 4. 23 5 and upon their fouls too, in making them every whit whole, John 7. 235 in token that he was the great Phyfician of both. Miracles in Hea- ven : at his Birth a ftar conducted the Wife-men to him, Matth. 2.25 at his paffion the Sun was darkr ned, Matth. 27.45. The ftar waited upon its Crea- tor at his Birth, the Sun fympathized with him in his Paffion. Miracles upon the Devils, in cafting them out by his Word, Matth. 8. 16. A fure fign, that the Powers of Hell could not ftand it out againft hinu in the Manifeftation of Chrift. i op him. Very various are the Miracles of our Saviour Chap. 6. recorded in Scripture : But if all had been written, the cx-v^ - ^ world could not have contained the books, faith St. John, Chap. 21. verf2 5. The words are Hyperbolical, yet they import, that many of his Works were not com- mitted to Writing. Amobius enumerates the mira- culous Works of Chrift, and then cries out, Quid Aiv.Gtxt.Li (imile Dii o nines, a qnibus opem dicitis acgris & peri- "clitantibus latam ? When did the Pagan Gods do the like, from whom you fay, that help is afforded to men in ficknefs or danger ? Never was there fuch plenty of Miracles as here. 3. The Miracles of Chrift were very great : He did thoje works which no other man did, Joh. 1 5. 24* It was never fo feen in Ifrael, Matth. 9. 33. I (hall inftance in two or three things : Firft, he railed up the dead : The maid in her Fathers houfe, the young man carried out upon the byer, and Lazarus four days dead and ftinking in the Grave. What things are theft ? How much above all the Powers in Na- ture ? In the fixth Council at Conjlantinople, Poly- crab. Tom. 2. chronhis a Monothclite, in Confirmation of his opi* 3 8 *' nion, offered to raife up a dead man 5 but upon try- al he could do nothing at all, which made the people cry out, Novo Simoni Anathema, Polychronio fedu&ori popidi Anathema. The Emperor Bafitius being in great grief for his deceafed Son, Theodoras S ^[[ d ™' A *''' Santabarenus prefented his Son to him as alive 5 but this was but a meer jpeUrum , an illufion of ftnfe : After a few kifles and embraces, the Emperor (aw his Son no more. Apollonius did call up the Ghoft of Achilles, that is to fay, a Devil, as the noble D < VmtMig. Momay (peaks. Ehfia railed the Shuna mites Son to Y7o Tl je P°w er of God Chap. 6. to life, but he was only a Minifter and a Type of ^-v*— v> Chrift 5 the Power of God did the work : but our Saviour raifed the dead by his own Divine Power. Another inftance is, his reftoring fight to one born blind, John 9. Touching which the blind man faith, Since the world began was it not heard, that any man evened the eyes of one that was born blind, verf. 32. It was a work fit for the Meffiah. It is indeed ftoried, that Vefpafian the Emperor reftored fight to the blind 5 but it may be the perfon was not really blind, at leall: not naturally. Satan (as Bellarmine well obferves ) might pofiibly refide in his Eye, and im- pede the ufe of* that part, that he might feem to cure, when he did but ceafe to hurt. But our Sa- viour by a Power above Nature and Art, did cure one really and naturally blind, and that with Clay $ a thing in it felf more probable to put out Eyes, than to cure them. And fo there was, as the Rab- bin$ fpeak, Miraadum in miraado, one Miracle within another 5 much as it was, when the bitter waters were made fweet by fait, 2 King. 2.21. Ano- ther inftance we have in his cafting out Devils : this w 7 as the Finger and Power of God. It is (aid in- deed, that Apollonius did caft Devils out of Men : jtayn. de lib. But how ? It was in the very Method and Difcipline jp.Tom. 2. fol. f Devils, by fuch words and fymbols as they them- 99o> 991* fy ves had prefcribed 5 fo it was not an ejection, but a going out by confent, to honour the Sacraments of their own making. But our Saviour did not caft them out in their own way 5 but whether they would or not, by his Almighty Power. It is fur- ther to be noted, that foon after the Death of our Saviour, the Devils Oracles were (truck Dumb. The Oracle in the Manifejlation of Chriji. 1 1 1 Oracle told Augttjius, That the Hebrew - Child bid Chap. 6. him leave that houfe, and be gone to Hell, no more v^v--^ anfwers were to be expe&ed from thence. Where- upon Augujius erefted an Altar in the Capitol, with this infeription upon it, H What can better accord together than healing Miracles, and healing Doftrines ? It is very reafonable to believe, that he, who did fuch wonders on the bodies of men, can do as much and more upon their fouls. He, who caft Satan out of the outward man, can ejedt him and all his furniture out of the inward. More* over it is to be obferved, that his Miracles were or- dinarily wrought upon Faith. Thus he (aid to the Centurion, As thou haji believed, fo be it done to thee, Matth. 8. 13. Thus to the blind men, According to your faith be it unto you, Matth. 9. 29. Thus to the Father of the poffefTed Child, If thou canjl believe, all things are pofjible to him that believeth, Mark 9. 23 , as if the Divine Power were made over to Faith. We fee here, how our Saviour in doing his Miracles, did put an honour upon Faith, which is the Condition of the Golpel 5 and withal, what great reaibn we have to go to him for Spiritual Mi- racles, who hath done fb many Corporal. The laft inftance of the Divine Power, is in con- verting the world to Chriftianity, in raifing up a People to God out of the ruins of the Fall. The Son in the M yet they would prop it up, and make it ftand before God : they were full of their own Righteoufnefs, and compleat in themfelves^ they looked only for a Temporal MeJJiah, one who by his outward greatnefs might fubdue their Enemies, and feaft them in the holy Land c K in the Manifejiation ofChrifl. \ 1 5 Land. A fpiritual Saviour they expe&ed not, nei-Chap. 6. thcr could it be thought according to their Princi- w^v*** pies, what fuch an one fhould do for them. As for his differing or dying for them, they jefted at it as an horrible abiurdity, faying, Tobias dcliquit, & jigog mmi of thc pletfituri, their own Temporal death was expiation /'»'. enough for all their fins. Hence the fick man was to pray thus, Sit mors mea cxpiatio pro omnibus pec- Buxt.Syn.c^i catis mcis. As for regenerating-Grace to be procured for them, they dream't of no Regeneration, but a ritual one. The baptized Profelytc was accounted by them as recens natus, one new-born. The fick man, having but his name changed, was efteemcd as nova creatura, a new creature. As for Eternal life, they thought they could earn it by their own Works. In none of thefe refpe&s would the pride of their hearts fuffer them to fee any need of a Spi- ritual Saviour. Further, they advanced their Tra- ditions above the written Word 5 their Talmud is, Lux ilia magna, that great light, 7/S. 9. 2. it is fun* damentum legis, the foundation of the Law. The n words of the Scribes ( fay they ) are more worthy f i* *% than the words of the Lair, and more weighty than the words of the Prophets. Thus departed they from the Scriptures, and run themfelves into a Labyrinth of Errors 3 the power and vigor of Religion was evaporated into rituals and empty formalities 5 if their Phylafteries were broad, it was no matter how narrow the Law or Obedience to it were. A clean outfide would fervc the turn, though within there were nothing but hellifh pollution. Great vices might pafs, fo as they were but fub umbra virtutis, under a fhadow of virtue $ their honefty was con- Q_ 2 fined tl6 The Power of God Chap. 6. fined to thole of their own Religion, none elfe were c*-vr*-o neighbours with them : they might lye or deal Slid, de fin falfly with a ftranger, he was no neighbour 5 if they Nat. did kill a ftranger, they were not to dye for it by *fe£ aL HXmt t ^ ie f ent ence of the Sanhedrin , he was no neigh- bour. Nay, and among themfelves their Corban was able to untie the bonds of Nature, and free them from Duty and Charity to their very Parents 5 they feemed to be for cleanfing the outfide, yet they fell into grofs abominations. The very Scribes and Pharijees, their great Rabbi es and Leaders, ( from whom they were not to decline, though they were told by them, that their right-hand were their left) would devour Widows houfes : and what but frauds and oppreffions could be looked for among the or- dinary fort? Indeed, among great and (mall ones, there was a deluge of iniquity } they had made their fins great, and to fill up the.meafure, they killed the Lord of life. This was the fearful ftate of the Jews. The Gentile World lay \v 7$ Toyn?£, 1 Joh.5.1^ in the evil one 5 in the hand and power of the De- vil, or in that which is evil, in wickednels, corrup- ting as a dead man doth in his Grave. It's true, within they had an implanted notion of a Deity 5 without, they had the Creatures proclaiming, their Creator. But alas, They held the truth in unrighte^ oufmfs, Rom. 1. 18. That little fpark in their bofom, which revealed a Deity, was but a. Captive 5 it could not break out to give Glory to its Maker , nor was it able to bear up the Honour of God in the World. They could not but know God, yet acknowledg binj they would not ; though he made and bear up all in the Manifeftation of Chrift. 117 all things 5 yet they owned him not, no, not in his Chap. 6. own World. They changed the glory of the incor- ' ruptible God, into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four footed beajls, and creep* ing things, Rom. 1.23. And a little after, They changed the truth of God into a lye, and worflnpped and ferved the creature more than the Creator, who is bleffed for ever, Verf. 25. They fell into all manner of Idolatries 5 any thing might be God, but the true one. An high difaonour it was for them to pre- fer the vileft Creatures before theOptimus Maximus^ the befl: and greateft of Beings. An horrible lye it was for them praftically to fay, That a brute, or a man, or a ftar was a God 3 or that a ftock, or a (tone, or a little dead matter in an Image, did refem- ble the infinite Spirit. Upon their Idolatry, being an nccurfed departure from God the fountain of Good- nefs, immediately followed a black train of abomi- nations : They were filled with all unrighteoufnefs, fornication, wickednefs, covetoufnefs, malicioufnefs, full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity 5 whijperers, backbiters, haters of God, defpiteful, proud, boajlers, inventers of evil things, difobedient to parents, with- out underftanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affe&ion, implacable, unmerciful, Rom. 1. 29, 30*3 IV They were in thefe things, as in their Element, afting out of finful hearts and habits, and fo gratifying their firft and fecond corrupt Nature both at once. And for all this they feemed to have a Patent from Heaven in the Vices of their gods, which their own Authors fet before them 5 they did but follow their Deities, their fins were made Divine by the higheft Example, This was the Itate of the Gentiles. And B 1 18 The Power of God Chap. 6. And now, what manner of Power was that, which railed up an holy People to God out of fo cor- rupted a World ? And how much work was there to be done about it ? The light was to be com- manded out ofdarknefs. The blind minds were to be opened upon Divine Myfteries. The Law was to come forth in its pure Spirituality. The great ne- ceffity of Chriftand Grace was to be inwardly felt. Shadows were to be turned into fubftance. Reli- gion was to be brought back to the heart. The mufty Traditions were to vanifh before the Word. The old Idols to be caft to the Bats and the Moles, thofe blind Creatures. The fallen Nature was to be new-framed. The finful habits to be unravelled. Sinners twice dead in fin, were to be raifed up into a Divine Life. Here a very excellent Power was manifefted. Hence the Apoftle prays for the Ephe- (tans, That they may have eyes to fee it^ that they may know what is the exceeding greatnefs of his power to us-ward who believe^ according to the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Chrifl, when he raifed him from the dead^ Eph. 1. 19,20. The words are very magnificent, Power, mighty Power, exceeding greatnefs of Power, all working, and in aft, as it was in the railing up Chrift from the dead 5 fo great a work is it to bring home finners to God ! The Divine Power will yet be more illuftrious in our Eyes, if we look upon the ftate of the World in the great Men of it, fuch as were great in Power or Wifaom. The great men in Power, the Emperors and Po* tentates of the World, were utter Enemies to Ghri- ftianity, breathing out nothing but blood againlt the in the Manifeflation of Chrijl. up the Profeflbrs of it. Nero firft kindled the furnace Chap. 6. of Perftcution againft them 5 he took occafion, as u-v^ pure malice lifts to do, from his own barbarous aft \ firft, caufing Rome to be fet on fire, and then catting the odium of that horrid ad upon the Chri- ftians. He fet forth Edifrs commanding to perfecute them unto Death, as Enemies of mankind 5 which made Tertullian fay, That it was grande bon?/n/,(bmc Apl cap. 5: great good that^Mn? condemned. Domitian firft flew his Brother Titus, and then blowcd up the furnace of Perftcution againft the Chriftians. He (pent moft of his time in catching of flies, yet would not omit the Chriftians. Trajan, no Nero, no Dormtian, but in efteem a pattern of uprightnefs, carried on the bloody work 5 he would not indeed have the Chriftians fought for , yet, if found, he would have them punifhed. Antoninus Philofophus was amiable to all others, yet cruel to Chriftians. Scve- rus, though illultrious in Moral virtues, wasftained with their innocent blood. Afterwards Maximinus, siTyforh ap Deans, Valerianus, Aurelianus, Diociefianus, turned c ^fV^m their bloody fwords upon them. The very name of afmdit in a Chriftian was crime enough 3 upon every ill acci- A cxlm dent the Chriftians were cryed out upon as worthy novi)^fams 9 of death, as the onlv caufts of the incumbent Ca- films, ftatim lamity. Thus the Powers of the World, for the ^SlSL three firft Centuries, though ordained for good, r«r, Terr. Ap. were Patrons of that great Evil, Idolatry, and utter ca P* &* Enemies to that great good, Chriftianity : No Chri- ftian in thofe times could imagine to retain his Re- ligion, unlets he were willing to* part with his life for it. The great men in Wifdom, the Philofophers of the 1 20 The Power of God Chap. 6. the World were Adverfarics to Chriftianity 3 their t^rv^rw Wits, as well as the Emperors Swords, were bent againft it : outwardly they were in the fplendor of Morality, and feemed to make fome approaches to- wards Chriftian Virtues ^ but inwardly they were black with Enmity againft the Gofpel, and at a vaft diftance from the holy Temper of it. Many cavils they made againft the Chriftians, but the root of their Enmity lay in two or three things : 1. Their carnal Reafon would not ftoop to the fupernatural Truths revealed in the Gofpel : they were for Humane Wifdom , but againft Divine. Thofe natural Truths which were within the fpher.e of Reafon, they looked on as Wiiclom : But thofe fupernatural ones, which were above it, they efteem- ed no better than foolifhnefs 5 fcorning that which they could not meafure, and cafting that down be- low their Reafon, which indeed was above it. With them St. Paul was but a babler, AEf. 17.18. one who had gathered up fome vanities, that he might fcatter them abroad to others. The Reforre&ion was a mat- ter of mockery, verf. 325 as if the limits of Nature could not be exceeded, no, not by the God of it. They thought that there was nothing in the Chrifti- '-bUgd. cent. 2. an Doftrines, prater flultitiam <& nvgas, but toys €%**' Fdt ' anc * ^°^ es ' Tfa* God (hould be born a Man, was againft Reafon, a thing utterly incredible. That a Juft. Mart, ad crucified man fhould be fecond to God the Father Anton. Q £ a jj^ was ma( j ne (s and intolerable folly. They thought that all the Wifdom lay on their own fide. Celjus could find much wifer things in Plato^ than Spind. Ann. in the Sacred Scriptures. Julian boafted, that the u^ian. or. QcttUks had all the learning, the Chriftians had only their in the Manifestation of Chriji. i a i their Creed 5 as if Faith, which is a key to infinite Chap. 6« treafures of Wifdom, were a poor inconfiderable i^-v~*** nothing. Thefe wife men of the World would not be made wifer than their own reafbn had made them, and upon that account they fet them- (elves againft the great Myfteries of the Gofpel. 2. Their corrupt hearts would not brook that (implicity and fincerity, which the Gofpel called for s they knew well enough, that there was but one God 5 yet in their very Worfhipf in which, if in any thing, they fhould have been fincere and pure-hearted ) they diiTembled, and made as if there were many, complying with the Idols of the place where they lived, and doing many things , Non tanquam Diis grata, fed tanquam legibus jujja , not as grateful to the Gods, but as commanded by the Laws. Hence St. Aufiin faith of Seneca, that Colebat quodreprehen- Auft. de c.d. debat, agebat quod arguebat : He worshipped what ^- c * l0, he reproved, he a&ed what he found fault with : under all the beauty of Moral Virtues there lay a falfe heart, fuch as could not bear a Command of in- ternal Purity. 3. They were ammaha glori&, Creatures which lived upon popular air. Accordingly their defign was as oppofite to that of the Gofpel, as pride is to the Grace of God. That which the Gofpel aimed at, was, that Pride might be ftained, that no flefh might glory in it (elf 5 that we might be (aved by meer Grace, that God might be exalted therein. But the aim of the Philofophers was quite contrary to this, they were lifted up in felf-excellencies : in all their Moral Virtues they did but facrifice to the pride of their own Reafon and Will j they needed R no 112 The Tower of God Chap. 6. no fuch thing as Grace or Prayer for it. Quid votis i^-v^ opus eft ? fie te fo*, the fmall fpark of Reafon in our bofbm,was enough to make us virtuous and hap- py ? No frame of mind, no, not that of the pro- fane man could be at a greater dilhnce from Hea- „ , , ~ , ven than this. Inter multos reos, nullus eft crimino- Saiv. di Gkb, r , . r ■ r J a 1. 4. \ior^ quam qui je non put at crimmojum. Among many guilty perfons, none is more criminal than the in the Manifejiation of Chrift. 12$ the prefumptuous felf-juftitiary, who thinks himfelf Chap. 6. not criminal at all. Thus flood the Philofophcrs, u—v^ all in Armor of Pride, oppofing the Gofpel, and the Grace of it. We fee here, to make men Chriftians, was an ad- mirable work, a great deal of Power was to be laid out upon it. Such a Faith was to be railed up, as might render them victorious over all the Power and Wifdom of the World. Such a temper of mind vmm cmx, was to be wrought, as might make them ready to k^-oftum welcom death in what (hape or terror foever it came^ao chTiflm and to pour out their dearcft blood and life for the hibum, Ignat. Cofpel. Thole fpirits, which before hung about Earth, and thefe lower things, were to be tuned for Heaven, and wound up to fo Divine a pitch, that the whole world (hould not be able to unbend them, to loofen them from Chrift, or let them down into earthly Vanities. The great Emperors, with all their Engines of Power and Cruelty, could not rent them off from the World to come, or piece them to the prefent evil one. The Philofophers, with all their Arts and Eloquence, could not decoy them from fupernatural Myfteries, or induce them to take up their repofe in humane Learning or Wif- dom. The whole World was annihilated to them, and they unto themfelves 5 they became fools, that they might be wife, and Nothing that God might be All : the Ornaments and Self-excellencies were put off, that they might be compleat in Chrift They lay at Gods feet for Mercy, and lived in a continual dependance upon the influences of his Spirit and Grace. In fuch a work as this the Arm of God muft needs be revealed in a very eminent. fl 2 manner. 124 The Tower of God Chap. 6. manner. Here we have juft caufe to fay, What hath C****"- w God wrought ! The Divine Power will yet more appear, if we look upon the inftruments in this Work. In ma- king the World there were none at all, no Leavers or Engines to rear up the great Fabrick. An Al- mighty word abfblved it : in converting it inftru- ments were uled 5 but fuch, that by the no-pro- portion between them and the great effeft, it might appear that the Power was of God only. He fent not the glorious Angels to Preach up a crucified Chrift, but Men. The treafure was in Earthen-vef- fels, in poor frail Mortals, who carried about bo- dies of Clay, That the excellency of the power might be ofGod^ 2 Cor. 4.7 5 that it might be clearly feen, that the great Work was Gods. Among men he lent not the Anjhe Shem, Perfons of Renown for Learning or Wi(Hom,but mean illiterate men. Hence the Apoftle faith, God hath chofen the fooliflo things of the world to confound the wife, and the we a lathings of the world to confound the mighty^ 1 Cor. 1. 27, that the Divine Power might appear in the Work. Thefe mean men preached, not with excellency of fpeech or wif dont, 1 Cor. 2. 1, with the charms of Eloquence, or the pomp of humane Wifclom 5 but with plain words : their Preaching was look't upon as foolifh- nefs. That falvation fhould be by a crucified Chrift feemed foolifh 5 that it {hould be communicated by *Jjf #i * ?60h Preaching, feemed more foolifh 5 that it (hould be done by Preaching in a low ? fimple^ plain manner, feemed moft foolifh of all. Yet in this way it was that Chrift would ride conquering, and to conquer the World to himfel£ The great fuccefs of their Preaching, in the Manifeftation of Chrifl. I ?5 Preaching, was a fignal proof that God was with Chap. 6. them of a truth. At Peters firft Sermon three thoufand fouls were converted unto Cod, Act. 2.41. and at his fecond they were encreafed to five thou- (and, Act. 4. 4. multitudes of Believers came in to Christianity. In a little time the Gofpel was pro- pagated over a great part of the World 5 one Paid fpread it from Jcrufalem to Illyriaim : And what did all the reft of the Apoftles, who carried about this Evangelical light, do? What did the feventy Difci- ples do, who, as Ecclefiaftical Writers fay, had their feveral Provinces to Preach the Gofpel in? The word did then run, and was glorified 5 it pafled through many Countries with a Divine fwiftnefs and fuccefs 5 at the found of the Gofpel the Workl wa3 fpiritually turned upfide down, and of Pagan be- came Chriftian. Tcrtuttian enumerates- divers Na- tions, and at laft adds touching us, BrHannorum m~ acccjja Rom am s loca, Chrijio tamen fubdita ftwt :, the Evangelical Power entred there where the Roman could not. By fuch weak means to produce fo great an efFeft, was a work worthy of Omni- potence. Moreover, the Divine Power will yet more ap- pear, if we confider the things propofed in the Gofpel. Narves the Roman - General, difcontented at the Emprefs Sophia, to invite the Lombards into Italy, fent them many forts of excellent fruits from thence. The Prefent being congruous to fenfe, the projeft took effeft. The Gofpel indeed pro pofes very excellent things to us. But they are (6 great, and fo far above humane Nature, that the propofal,. if not accompanied with a Divine Power*, would 126 The Tower of God Chap. 6. would have been altogether ineffe&ual. I (hall in- ftance in two or three things : i. It propofes fuper-rational Myfteries, fuch as the Doftrine of the Sacred Trinity. The Incarna- tion of the Son of God. The Satisfa&ion made to Juftice by his Blood. Thefe are obje&s of Faith, and fo depend one upon another, that unlefs we believe the Trinity, we cannot believe the Incarna- tion 5 and unlefs we believe that, we cannot be- lieve a Satisfaction «> and without believing that, we cannot fulfil the condition of the Gofpel, which re- quires us to reft upon Chrift for falvation Thefe therefore are necellary objefts of Faith :, but with- out an Aft of Divine Power, Faith in thefe cannot be had. Two things evidence this : the one is ex ftirte objeUi, the things are above Reafon. As the things of Reafon are above Senfe, fo the things of Faith are above Reafon : without a Revelation Rea- fon could not have found out thefe Myfteries, after it, Reafon cannot comprehend them. It may fha- dovv them out by fimilitudes 5 but there is in them a light unapproachable, fuch as Reafon cannot took into 5 an infinite Abyfs, fiich as Reafon cannot mea- fure. The other is ex parte fubje&i 5 man, who is to believe thefe things, is fallen, and in his fall not one or two faculties fell, but all of them 5 and among the reft his intellectual and believing facul- ties fell alfo. The intellect hath loft its fubjeftion to God the Supreme Truth. The believing facul- ty centers in the Creature, and without the Power of Grace cannot lift up it felf to fupernatural Truths. A Divine Power is rcquifite^ to captivate the un- derftanding to the firft Truth, to elevate the be- lieving in the Manifejiation ofChriJi. 1 27 lieving faculty to fuper-rational Myfterics. Hence in Scripture Faith is called the Gift and Work of God, fuch an one as is the product of Divine Power : it is wrought by Power, Eph. 1. 19. it is fulfilled and confummated by Power, 1 Thef. 1. 11. it is ftiled the fbirit of faith, 1 Cor. 4. 13. It is not from our own fpirit, but Gods outwardly revealing the myfterious object in Scripture, and inwardly inlight- ning and elevating the heart to entertain it. Hence Fnlgcntius compares the production of Faith in the camm Mam heart, with the conception of Chrift in the Virgins V(C f onc j$ tre xtt 1 1 1 l J i_ r o • ■ r>\ -n Virgo pofletnec Womb} both are by one and the lame Spirit. Chrift p mre ' v.ifi e- is no left formed in the heart by it, than his flefh W m car ™ was in the Virgin. It is therefore a work of Power J^m^or- to raife up the mind of man to believe thofe fu- turn s in bomi- pernatural Myfteries, which are far above it felf. foneivl%d!s poterit, riec au- gsri, nip earn Spiritus Sanftas hfundat & nutriat : ex etdem Spiritu rtnati fi which are no attra&ives to a carnal heart, unlefs it be ele- vated unto them by the Power of Grace. This plainly appears by comparing the heavenly Rewards and the earthly Man together. The Rewards are at a great diftance from fenfe. They lye in another world. The treafure is in Heaven. The recompence is above. A red Sea of death is to be patted through before we can come at it. The Man, to whom the tender is made, is earthly, carnal, living by fenfe, wrapt in the vail of time} one like the infirm Wo- man in the Gofpel, who is bowed together, and can in no wife lift up himfelf , no, not to a Heaven of Glory and Blcffcdncfs freely offered unto him. He hangs in the Clay of one earthly thing or other, and by bonds of ftrong Concupifcence is faftned to this lower world $ and, which is a prodigy in an im- mortal foul, he loves to be fb 3 and thinks that it is good being here. A little Earth with him, is bet- ter than Heaven. Senfual pleafures out-relifh the pure Rivers above. O how unfit is fuch a man to clofe in with fuch a reward ! How much work mud be done to make him capable of it ! The man muft be un- earthed and unbound from this lower world. The S con- i^o The Truth of God concupifcential ftrings, which tye him thereunto, muft be cut, that his foul may have a free afeent towards Heaven. A precious faith muft be raifed up, that this world may appear, fuch as it is, a (ha- dow, a figure, a nothing to make man happy 3 that Heaven with its beatitudes may be realized and pre- fentiated to the mind. A Divine Temper mult be wrought, that he may be able to rent off the Vail of time, and take a profpeft of Eternity - to put by all the World, and look into Heaven. He muft be a pilgrim on Earth, living by Faith, walking in Ho- linefs, every ftep preparing for, and breaching after the heavenly Countrey. He muft pray, work, ftrive, wreftle, watch, wait, ferveGod inftantly, and all this to be rewarded in another world 5 without fuch a Temper Heaven will fignifie nothing, and with- out a Divine Power fuch a Temper cannot be had. Hence St. Peter tells us, That God hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the refurre&ion of Jefus Chriji from the dead, to an inheritance incorruptible, I Pet. 1. 3, 4. The lively hope, which takes hold upon the great Reward, is not from the Power of Nature 5 no, 'tis from a Divine Generation, 'tis an heavenly touch from Chrift rifen and fitting at the right hand of Majefty, from thence to do Spiritual Miracles, as upon Earth he did Corporal. Hence St. Paul argues, If you be rifen with Chriji, feel^thofe things which are above, Col. 3. 1. The natural man dead in fin cannot leek them 3 only thofe who are fpiritual and rifen with Chrift can do it. It is there- fore from the Divine Power and Spirit, that men, naturally carnal and earthly 5 are made capable of clofing with the heavenly and fupernal Rewards , which are tendred in theGolpel The 1 in the t Manifeflation of Clnift. 151 The Power of God being fo glorioufly revealed, Chap. 6, how humble (hould our minds be? How fhould our Reafon kneel and bow down before fuch a Myftery as that, God manifeft in the flefh ? There was a pattern of humility in the Condefcenfion of it , and withal there was matter of Adoration in the Myftery. Pre- fume not,0 man, to meafure Divine Myfteries by thy Reafon, which bears not fo much proportion to them, as a little (hell doth to the great Ocean. Re- member, thy Reafon is fhort and finite : The Myfte- ries are deep and infinite. If God could not work above the meafure of Man, he would ceafe to be God. If Myfteries were not above the line of Rea- fon, they would ceafe to be Myfteries. When theft are before thee, do, as an Ancient advifcs, *rffy«f« >rtiv *ht9, bring forth thy Faith, fubjed thy intellect to the Supreme Truth, captivate thy thoughts to Scrip- ture, humbly adore and confefs, That the Lord doth great things and unsearchable, marvelous things without number, Job. 5. 9. This is the way to have know- ledg and eftablifhment, like the pious Man in Gerjbn, whole certainty in Articles of Faith was not from Reafon or Demonftration, but from humiliation and illumination, a montibus aternk. The Socinians^ who. in intelleftual pride do foo^x*^ fight againft God and fiipernatural Truths, lo(e themftlves and the Myftery together. But the humble foul, who fiibje&s his Reafon to God and his Truth, is rooted in Faith, and eftabliftied by Grace. Again, The Power of God being revealed in a way of Grace, Kow (hould we look up to him by Faith, that he may do great things for us ? He, who gave his own Son to come in the flelh, can do every S 2 thing !^2 Tta Power of God^&c. Chap. 6. thing for us. He can raife up Children to Abraham out of the very ftones : He can melt the Rocky heart into Repentance : He can write his Law in the inward parts: He can make us willing in the day of his Power : He can fubdue the mod ftrong and in- veterate lufts : He can new-frame the heart, and draw his own Image upon it : He can make all Grace abound towards us, and fupply all our need according to his Riches in Glory by Chrift Jefus: Let us look unto him and be fayed. Let our Souls ever be in a pofture of waiting and dependance upon him, that the Divine Power, which was fo eminently manifefted in Chrift, may in a meafure be - felt and experimented in us, that we, who are poor impotent Creatures in our felves, may be able to do all things through Chrift ftrengthning us. CHAP, 133 Chap. 7. CHAP. VH: The Truth of God manifefied w Chrijl. Tl.e Prorate of the Mejfiah. The Mejfiah is already come. Je- fus is the true Mejfiah. All the other Promifes are built upon him. The truth of the Moral Law evi- denced in him. The Mandatory part proved by his aftivc Obedience 5 The Minatory by his Sufferings. He is the fnbfiance of the Types and Sacrifices. Somewhat in him anfwers to them- and fomewkat in him infinitely tranfeends them. The truth of Worfhip fet forth in him : He un clogged it from Ri- tuals, opened the fpiritual mode of it, communicates Grace for it , reveals the great Reward of Eternal Life. HAving fpoken of other Attributes, I proceed in the laft place to confider the TRUTH of God. It was a notable fpeech of a Philofopher, That Truth is fo great a Perfection, that if God would render him- felf vifible unto men, he would chufe Light for his Body 6 and Truth for his Soul. Indeed God is Ipfijfima Ve- ritas, very Truth it felf 5 and can no more ceafe to be fuch, than he can ceafe to be Himfelf. He is true in his Effence : Others are only gods by fancy or fiftion, but he is God by nature and effence. He is true in his Promifes:, he means what he promifes, and he doth what he means. Promiffa tuafunt, quk falli C 9nfeflizc.i, timeat, cum promittit Veritas .r mm ^ compaft of the Seventy weeks mentioned in Dan. 9, many things were to come to pa(s$ The re-edifying the City and Temple of ferufalent^ the coming and cutting off the Meffiah, the confirmation of the Co- venant, the ccffation of the Sacrifices 5 and after all thefe, the univerfal deftru&ion was to enfue. How- ever thefe weeks be computed, yet it evidently ap- pears, that firft the Meffiah was to come and be cut off, ver.26? and afterwards the Oblation and Sacri- fice was to ceafe, v. 27 : this being the true order of things in the Text, the Meffiah muft needs come whilft the Sacrifices were (landing. If the Sacrifices under this fecond Temple have for thefe 1600 years ceafed, as they have, then the Meffiah muft needs be come many Centuries fince. Franzius ufed this ar- scho. sacr, difi gument to a learned Jevp^ who only returned this t uU I0 » 7 2 > anfwer, Perhaps one week in Darnel might be one 7 *' 74 * thoufand years. Franzius replied, If that were admit- ted, Yet, if he thought that Daniel's weeks were not expired, he would entreat him to fhew where the Jews do now tacrifice : feeing, according to Daniel^ the Meffiah was to come before the abrogation of the Sacrifices, it muft needs be that the Sacrifices muft ftill ftand in being , if the Meffiah were not yet come. To this no anfwer at all was made, the knot being indeed too hard to be untied. Further, the Meffiah was to come while the fecond Temple was (landing 5 hence that of the Prophet, The glory of this latter Honfe fiall be greater than of the former^ Hag. 2. 9. The firft Temple had more of outward glory and magnificence than the fecond. Under the firft 1^6 The Truth of God Chap. 7. firft there were (as the Rabbins obferve) five things, the Ark, the Fire from Heaven, the Majcfty, or She- cinah, the Spirit of Prophecy , the Urim and the Tkummim^ which were wanting under the fecond: From whence then came that greater glory in the fe- cond ? The Prophet tells us , God would fiake the heavens and the earthy that is, do a very great work 3 the Meffiah , the Defire of all Nations fiwuld come, v. 6, 7 3 His pretence fhould put a greater glory up- on the (econd Temple, than was upon the firft. In the firft there was the types and fymbols of Gods prefence, but into the fecond the Lord himfelf came in our aflumed nature, Mai. 3. 1, and fo filled it with glory. This is the only tolerable account can be given of that greater glory : This (econd 1 emple being long fince deftroyed, it muft needs be that the Meffiah did come before the fall of it. The other is this : Our Jefus the Son of Mary, is the true Meffiah 3 he is that feed of the woman who broke the Serpents head, Gen. 3.153 no other feed, nomeer man could do it 3 but the Son of God, being made of a woman, did defiroy the works of the devil , 1 Joh. 3. 8. Partaking of flefl) and bloody he did through death defiroy him who had the power of death, that is J he devil, Heb. 2.14. That firft Pro- mile made almoft Four thoufand years before, was accomplished in him. He is that feed of Abraham in whom all the nations of the earth w T ere to be blef- fed, Gen. 22. 18. Never was it (aid of any man but him(elf, That all Nations fhould be bleffed in him : Never was any man but he, who was God as well as man, able to turn that Curfe which lay upon the human nature, into a bleffing. He is Jacob's Shiloh^ Gen, in th&Manifefkation of Chrijt. 137 Gen. 49. ioj at his coming the Scepter departed: Chap. 7. Herod an Edomite ruled over the Jews $ and, to make himfelf the more abfblute, he flew the Sanhe- drin ^ in a little time all government was taken away from the Jews : Hence that outcry in the Talntud, V and a World. He is the Meffiah in Daniel 5 his blood made an end of fin ; his perfeft Sacrifice put an end to all the legal ones. Under the Meffiah there was only to be the Sacrifice of Tboda or Thankfgi- ving- He is the Ruler come out of Bethlehem Ephra- tah, Mic. 5. 2. As God, his goings forth were of old, from everlafting «, as Man, he came in time out of Bethlehem : Never fuch an one as he came from thence. He is the defire of the nations, in Haggai, who filled the fecond Temple with glory : The Man, Gods fellow, in Zachary^ who was (mitten for us, and in his wounds opened a fountain for fin and for un- \\Jtm* cleannefs. The\SW of right eon fnefs, in Malachi, who with enlightning and healing-beams (bines into the hearts of men. The Promifes of the Meffiah are all accompliftied in him. What the old Teftament fore- told, the New exhibited. The refpe&s and fweet correfpondencies which are between the two Tefta- ments, clearly and punftually (hew that Tefas is the Chrift Again, here appears the truth of all the other Promifes in the Gofpel, which are as fo many fuper= ftru&ures upon the firft fundamental promiie of the P, Gi/.Iib. 2. Meffiah. The earth ( faith Rabbi Eliezer) fiands up- ca ^' 2 *' on Tfadich, upon the righteous one, that is, upon the Meffiah. I may add, Heaven and all the Graces which lead thither, ftand upon him too. In him all the prcmifes are yea and amen, 2 Cor. I. 20 : (ure and ftable, as being founded upon his blood 5 hence his blood is called the blood of the Covenant, Heb. 13.20, as procuring it for us 5 and the New Teftament is called the nero teftament in his blood, Luk. 22.20, as * being in the Manifeftttion of Cbrijl. 139 being founded upon it. God is now obliged to per- Chap. 7. form the Evangelical Promifes, not meerly by his own infinite Veracity, but by his Contract with his Son, from whom he hath received a valuable confe- deration in his blood for the doing of it. The Pro- mifes are fecured by a double feal , God's Veracity and Chrift's Elood 5 fo they can no more h\\ than the Truth of the one, and the Merit of the other. The Apoftle argued thus: Godfpared ??ot his own So??, knt delivered him irp for us all^ how foal I he rot vcith him freely give us all thi??gs ? Rom. 8. 32. We may thus argue 5 If God would not go back, but perform the promife of the Meffiah, which could not be done but at an expence fo vaft, that in the doing of it he muft part with his Son out of his bofbm, and his Son muft part with his blood for us, how (hall he not fulfil all other Promifes? The Pro- mile of the Meffiah was the moft difficult of all, ei- ther for God to perform, or for us to believe: the foolifh builder lays the foundation, and is not able to finifh 5 but the wife and true God, who laid the foundation of Promifes in his Sons blood, will be fure to accomplifh them 5 not one thing of them fhall fail : upon what Promife foever we can regularly fet our faith, we may take it as our own 5 all the bleffings of it (hall be made good to us. Further, we fee here the truth of the Moral Law, that is made up of two parts, a Mandatory part, and a Minatory. The Mandatory part ftands in Precepts } the truth of thefe confifts in this, that they are the Counterpanes of Gods heart , real copies of his ap- proving will 5 the matter of them is confbnant to his Sanctity and Re&itude, acceptable and well-pleafing T 2 in i 4 the life of a Beaft inftead of that of a Man. Sutably, Chrift the meek, patient, immaculate Lamb of God, flood in our room 5 he died for us, he gave his life a ranfbm *VJi nohZv^ inftead of many, Mat. 20.28. His Perfon was put iu the room of ours, and his Tufferiiigs too in the room of ours. Had he not flood in our ftead, he could not have been capable either to bear the ftroke of penal fufferings, or to free us from the fame 5 not to bear penal fufferings, he being nothing but meer innocency in himfelf 5 nor to free us from them, he being in no conjunftion with us. The facri- fice being put in the finncrs room, had fin imputed to it} they were to lay their hands upon the head of it, Lev. 1.4: a confeflion of fins was made over the Scape-goat, Lev. 16.21$ their fins were in a fort transferred upon the facrifice, that it might bear them away. Thus it was with Chrift, he was made fin for us, 2 Cor. 5.21. The Lord laid on him the iniquities of us all, Ifa. 53. 6. Our guilt, as it was fundamentum pccn£, w r as imputed to him fb far, as to render his fuf- ferings penal 5 and, as an Ancient hath it, he was de- lift orum fufceptor, non commi£br$ having no guilt of his own, he ftood under ours, in order to a glorious expiation and abolition of it in his death and fatif- faftion. Sin being charged upon the facrifice, there was defru&io rci oblat£ , a deftroying of the thing offered : fb it was with Chrift, when our fins were V laid 146 The Truth of Cod Chap. 7- laid upon him 5 with the Corn he was bruifed, with the Wine and Oyl poured out, with the Lamb (lain and roafted in the fire of Gods wrath, and with the Scape-goat driven into the wildernefs of defertion, crying out, My God my God, why haft thou forfaken me} His fufferings were very many and great for us. The facrifice being slain, its blood did expiate fin, an atonement was made, remiffion enfued upon it : Thus Chrift dying on the crofs, his blood was expiatory^ our fault was compenfated, Juftice wasfatisfied,wrath was averted, and God appeafed and reconciled to- wards us. In thefe things appears a fair analogy be- tween thofe ancient facrifices, and Chrift the great Sa- crifice. The other is this : There is that in Chrift which in- finitely tranfcends all the legal facrifices. In the fa- crifice there was only a brute in perfeftion, but in Chrift there was an human nature in perfeftion 5 an human nature which had the Spirit above meafure, and was as full of grace as the capacity of a creature could hold : there was in his humanity fuch a beauty and unmatchable perfeftion of grace, as far furpaf- led the united and accumulated excellencies of all the Angels in Heaven. The facrifice ftood and fuf- fered in the room of offenders by conftraint and compulfion, it was bound with cords to the horns of the Altar : but Chrift ftood and differed in our room by choice and voluntary fponfion 5 his foul was not fnatched away, but poured out 5 his life was not meerly taken away, but laid down:, he was under no conftraint but that of his own compaflion $ he was tied with no cords but thofe of his own love. In the private facrifice fome particular fin was charged * . upon in the Manifestation of Chriji, upon it 5 in the publick one, the fins of the Jewifi Chap. 7. Nation were charged upon it : But upon Chrift were laid the fins of a World, fins of vaft distances, as fir remote in place as the quarters of the earth, and in time, as the morning and evening of the world, met all together upon him. In the facrifice there was a meer fimple death.and the blood was but the blood of a bruterbut Chrifts death was not a meer fimple one, but a death with a fting and a curfe in it:, a death with as much wrath in it,as was due to the fin of a world} nor was his bloodthe blood of abrute,butthebloodof aman,nay of God himfelf: and what manner of Sa- crifice was this! how compenfative for fin! how fatis- faftory to Juftice! how averfive of wrath! how impe- rative of all good ! In every refped it was infinitely valuable and fufficient. The Sacrifice fuo modo did expiate fin, it took away civil guilt, by freeing the offender from that temporal death which in the ftrift fandtion of the Law was due to him. It took away ceremonial guilt, by freeing him from thofe legal im- purities which excluded him from the publick Wor- fhip 5 hence the Apoftle faith, That the blood of bulls and goats, and the aflies of an heifer fprinkling the un- clean, did fanUifie to the purifying of the fleflo, Heb. 9. 13. Thus far went the facrifice, but it could go no further : the moral guilt was (till unremoved, Ju- ftice was ftill unfatisfied, the wrath to come was ftill unaverted, God as yet was unreconciled 5 there was fomewhat done to the flefh, nothing to the confid- ence 5 fomewhat mforo foli, in the Jewifh Judicature, nothing mforo poll, in the Court of Heaven, to give a full fatisfaftion to Divine Juftice. Hence the Apo- ftle faith, that thofe facrifices, though often repeated, V 2 could *■ H I 148 The Truth of God Chap. 7. could not make the comers thereunto perfeft, Hcbr. b* 0m *sr m sj 10. 1. The blood of bulk and goats could not take away fin, v. 4. Still there was a confcience of fin, and a remembrance of it every year, v. 2, 3. . Hence God reprobated all thofe facrifices, and would have none of them 5 they were not reje&ed for the hy- pocrifie of the offerer, as they were IJa. 1.12, 13 ^ nor comparatively as being in the outward work left than mercy, Hof.6.6: But they were rejefted as not able to do the great work, to expiate fin 5 they were to vanifti as Clouds before the Sun, as Types before the fubftance. But when Chrift gave himfelf an offer- ing and a facrifice to God for aTweet-imelling favour^ V \3\*/hM( Ephef 5. 2, there was afcenal, total expiation of fin} \ not the flefh but the Confcience was purged, not ce<- remonial, but Moral guilt was done away. Thus the Apoftle, comparing his Sacrifice with the legal ones, iaith, The blood of Chrift, who through the eternal fpirit offered up himfelf without fpot to God, Jloall purge your conference from dead works toferve the livingGod, Heb. 9. 14. Emphatica omnia, & totidempene caufe, quot verba, £tern&re/* is not nude Prefcience, it is, as a learned man (peaks, Pr£- cognitio cum cura, a Precognition with care. It is the Divine Reafon of the Supreme Lord, which difpofes of all things 5 it is that aft of God whereby he doth in eternity pre-ordain, and in time direft every thing to the great end of all, his own glory. The Scrip- ture doth very fully fct forth this : Of him, and through Of PRO V ID EN C£. 157 through him, and to him are all things, Rom. 1 1. 36 : Chap^8. Of him as the Author, through him as the Conferva- tor and Dire&or, and to him as the ultimate End, are all things. He giveth life 3 and breath , and all things, A&s 17. 25. In him we live, and move, and have our beings ver. 28. The original, the continu- ance, the guidance of all is from him. As a mighty- Monarch he doth whatsoever he pleafeth in heaven and in earth* Pfal. 135. 6, He doth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth. None can flay his hand, or fay unto him , What doft thou? Dan. 4. 35. All places are within his do- minion, all creatures are under his government : Known unto him are all hk works, &n*> **ptuv d f yj> A' n* &*d/]a *) «r/ $ £i*y!\iu , There is a Divine Principle, by which all things both are, and continue to be. Thus Ariflotle, What the Governour is in the Ship, the Driver in the CfMrjot, tfa Mafler in the Dance J he Law 7H 158 Of PKOVIDENC Eli Chap. 8. in the City, the Leader in the Army, that is God in the World. Thus Tully argues 5 God is the moji excellent being, and therefore mujl needs be Governour of the World. Plato % Idea's exifting in the mind of God, were, as is thought, no other than his Decrees. The Fate of the Stoicks, is by fome taken for nothing elfe but the Providence of God. Hence the Epicureans, who denied Providence, in contempt called it, Anum fatidicam Stoicornm, the Stoicks foretelling old wo- man. There was excellent Divinity in the ancient Fable, That ntfvot*, or Providence, was Midwife to Latona, that is, Nature. The Creature, though ne* ver fo pregnant with power, brings forth juft nothing Aufl. detiv. without it. Plotinm difputes, That the Providence I. -io. c. 14. Q |T q oc j reac hes to the loweft things. The Flowers have their beauty from an incommutable form 5 the fenfible World comes from that intelligible one which is with God. a Deus Reafon evinces this Truth. A World without mique Provi- a Providence is a very great abfurdity : in fuch dens eft ut a ca £ fo ov/ (hould God be God? May he be an infi- fer U ei pooft" n i te Mind, and without forecaft ? or a pure Aft, and divinitas at- do nothing at all among his creatures ? May he be p^^jj 1 ^^ every- where prefent, and no- where profitable ? Or neat, & pra> fill all thing?, and fignifie nothing ? May he be an in- fentia fciat,gc telligent Agent, and without an End? Or the Great dat" u°fadt Alpha, and forget that he is 0;.^a? May he be Crea- W- tor of all, and yet no Provifor? Or Almighty, and yet not reign over his own World? May he be infi- nitely Wife and Good, and yet negleft himfelf and his Creatures, his own glory and their good ? Is it imaginable that fuch an One as he (hould frame a World out of nothing, and fet it in delicate Order, meerly Of P ROV ID ENC E. 159 mcerly for Fortune to (port it felf in, or to fhurHle Chap.8. down into confufion ? And how then could the u*~v*o World be a World ? Or how could it (land in order, or its parts hang together by links of amity ? With- out the hand and touch of Providence, Nature would jangle and be out of tune : without its glue and vir- tue, the whole fyftem would unframe and fall afun- der in a moment. If God, faith Bradwardhie, fhould vt can[n Dei, ceafe to be, there could be nothing part or future, *' r * c ' I4# true or falfe, poflible or impoflible, neceflary or con- tingent : fo neceflary is He. I may fay, If God fhould ceafe to work, there could be nothing in all the world but perfect nullity. So neceflary is his Provi- dence. There are two great a&s of Providence g the one is Confervative, which upholds all : The other Or- dinative, which direfts and difpofe of all. Both are eminently iet forth in Jefus Chrift. The firft aft of Providence is Confervative, and upholds all 5 the Creature cannot preferve and immor- talize it (elf, for then it would be a Self-fubfiftence 5 and a God to it felf: it ftands juxta non efje, at the brink of nullity ^ and unlefs that Divine Power which brought it from thence into being, hold it up there, it naturally returns and falls back into Nothing as its Center. Prefervation is an influx of Beings and none but the Supreme Being, which is its own original, can afford fuch a thing. It is a continued Creation, and none but he who gives ej]c pimo, the firft being to a creature, can give ejje porro, the te- cond or protracted being to it. Should he withdraw his influence, or ceafe eontinno facere^ ftill to go on preferving and new-making, as it were, his Creature, it i6o Of PROVIDENCE. Chap. 8. it would vanifh into nothings no creature could be- gin where he left, or carry on the work. Should all the Angels in Heaventry and put out all their ftrength, to guard and keep up in being the leaft particle of matter, and that but for one moment only, they could do nothing, they could not be Creators at fecond hand, I mean in point of Prefervation. The Earth, being the Center of the World, feems to (land faft, and yet without Providence it would waver into nothing. The Sea is a vaft (preading Element^ and yet were it not in the hand of Providence, it would contract it felf into nothing. The Heavens are ftrong bodies, and yet all thofe glorious Arches, unlefs kept in repair by Providence, would fill and totter down. The Angels are immortal Spirits, and yet their im- mortality is a donative and a continual fpiration from the Father of fpirits % the knot of their perpetuity is Providence, and without it they would break and diilblve into nothing. Providence, we fee, contains and preferves all things : a great truth this is, but it was never fo manifefted as in Jefus Chrift. If ever any creature might preferveit fel£ one would think that the higheft, nobleft of all friould do fo } his hu- man nature was lifted above the top of the Creation, above the higheft Angel : It was, which never any Creature was before , affumed into the Perfon of God 5 yet it had no fubfiftence of its own, it did not preferve it felf$ it was held by that Deity which it did cohabit with in the Perfon of the Word : ftill it was a Creature, it could not, like the Deity, foread it felf over the World : it v/as not a felf-fubhftent or independent upon its Creator. Here we plainly Tee, that no ; creature, no not the higheft, can fivpport it Of PROF I DEN C E. idi it (elf in being without Providence. Ellhardus Lu- Chap. 8 bin us, in his Book De Cauja Mali, hath drawn a very ingenious Scheme to (hew the dependence of the Creature upon God 5 he fets the fummnm Ens up- pcrmoft, under it the fcale of Creatures in their or- der, firft Angels, then Men, then Beafts, then Vegeta- bles, then mecr being, under all imurn nihil. As far as the fumtnitm Ens draws any thing ex imo nihilo^ out of meer nothing, (b far it afcends the fcale into be- ing, or life, or fenfe, or reafon, or Angelical perfecti- on : As foon as he leaves it, it finks down into the imnm nihil, into nothing. This doth in a very lively manner fet forth the dependence of the creature up- on its Makers but it was never fo fully fet forth as in Jefus Chrift : His human nature, though above the whole fcale of creatures, is fupported by the Deity: No creature now may prefume that it can be a felf- fubfiftent, or ftand upon its own bottom 5 all muft confefs a Providence fupporting and bearing of them up in being. The fecond aft of Providence is Ordinative, it directs and governs all : God fleers the fhip of the World, and all the paflengers in it: He orders the great Houfe, and all the Families of creatures in it. Providence turns every wheel in nature 5 and when there is a wheel within a wheel, intricacy and feem- ing crofsnefs of motion 5 yet there is an eye in the wheel, a wife Providence which preferves order in confufions. All things are direfted by congruous means to their proper end. There are millions of creatures which know not what an end is 5 but Pro- vidence condufts them thither. Millions of Events are cafual as to us 5 but there is a certainty in Provi- Y dence. i6i Of P ROVIDENCE. Chap. 8. dence. Millions of ads are free as to us, yet Provi- dence hath a foveraignty over them. In all things God is Alpha and Omega, the firft Mover, and the laft End} the wife Difpofer and (iire Moderator of every thing for his own glory. This great Truth is excellently let forth in Chrift. Three things will make this evi- dent. i. There was a fignal Providence over Chrift. 2. There was a great Providence over the fruit of his Satisfa&ion, in railing up a Church. 3. All other Providences may be reduced to the other two. i. There was a fignal Providence over Chrift. Gods eye and heart were upon the Temple, which was but a type 5 how much more intent muft they be upon Chrift who is the fubftance ? Providence ail-a- long had an eye upon him : It watched over his Ge- nealogy 5 a deluge fwept away the corrupt World, but Noah muft have an Ark 5 the true Noah, the Meffiah, who is our reft and comfort, was to come from him. Abraham's, body, and Sarah's womb, were both dead 5 yet there muft be an Ifaac, that the true Ifaac, the joy of the Father , may come in the flefh from him. Ifaacwas in a fort offered up, that he might be a type of Chrift 5 but not iacrificed and aftualVy (lain, that Chrift might come from him. Ju- 4ah and Tamar commit inceft, yet Providence is not ut a ftand 5 no Medium is too hard for it 5 even this way came the Holy One into the fle(h. Ruth muft leave her Countrey, aad be married to Boaz, that David, and afterwards Chrift, the true David, whofc Kingdom was to be perpetual, might come from thence* The whole Scripture aims at Chrift;, but the Of PR0V1 DENCE. ,63 the Book of Ruth lecms to be penned on purpofe toChap. 8, (hew forth his Genealogy. The Tribe of Judah was carried to Babylon? the Family of David was brought into a very low mean condition : but Judah mud re- turn again, the withered ftem of David mull: bud and bring forth the Meffiah, and that when it was in the lowed: ebb. The Lamp of David was almoft quite extinct} but at the coming of the Meffiah it was tur- ned into a glorious Sun, which fhould reign for ever. When Chrift was to come, Providence took order that it fhould be in due circumftances} a long train of types and facrifices, fuch as filled many ages, pafled before his appearance. There was Galli avium Prophetaruw, the Cock-crowing of the Prophets, be- fore the rifing of this Sun. John Baptifl came a little before, to prepare the way of the Lord by Sermons of Repentance. At laft he came in the fulnefs of time, in the prae-appointed hour. When the Gentiles were defperately corrupted,when the Jews were hor- ribly degenerate, then he came to heal the world. He was born in the right place. Auguftuts Tax calls up Jofeph and Mary to Bethlehem , the Houfe of Bread, that there our Saviour, the true Bread from Heaven, might be born. He being God and Man in one per- fon , Providence took order , that all along there fhould be an appearance of Majefty and Meannefs: At his birth there was a Star directing to him, wife men worfhipping him, an Hoft of Angels congratu- lating the good tydings 3 yet himfelf an Infant,wrap- ped in poor clouts, and laid in a Manger. In his life he caft out Devil?, yet was tempted 5 he healed in- firmities, yet was weary. The glory of Myferiesand Miracles brake forth from him, yet he was in the fa- Y 2 fliion 1 64 Of PROVIDE NCE. Chap. 8. (hion and frailty of a man. The Officers a little be- fore his death, went backward and fell to the ground:, yet he was apprehended : He was crucified through weaknefs, but liveth by the power of God. He hung upon a Croft, but even there triumphed over all the powers of darknefs. All which fuits to God in the rlefh. Nothing more fublime than God , nothing more vile than Flefh. Accordingly in our Saviour there appeared a mixture of glory and weaknefs. To add but one thing more } Providence would have the righteoufnefi of* his life, and the fufferings of his death, to be fuch as might be a full and ample Satifc faction for the fin of the world} and (bit was. The righteoufhefs of his life highly honoured the rule of the Law 3 the fufferings of his death were accommo- dated, as much as could be, to the curfe of the Law. Here the two great things, in which the Law hath as high a completure as could poilibly be in a Spon- for on our behalf, that is, fulfilling the righteoufnefs, and bearing the curie of the Law , were both emi- nently comprifed. Here the two great Attributes of God which called for a Satisfaction,, that is, his Holi- nefs, which perfectly hates fin} and his Juftice, which punifheth it 5 were both gratified to the full. This Satisfaction, as obediential, pleafed Gods Holinefs} as penal,latisfied his Juiticej, in both there was b~ So the holv light was fpread abroad in the World. 2. Providence takes order that the Holy Spirit in the ufe of the means, fhould (b cffeftually operate, as might infallibly fecure a Church unto God. Hence, befides the light in the means, there is an in-fhining into the heart 5 befides the outward hearing, there is an hearing and learning of the Father: Cathedram in Epift. jV-V, in aelo habet, qui corda docet : He hath a Chair of Traft * 3- State in Heaven, who teaches hearts, faith St. Auftin. There is not only a propofal of objects, but an infu- fion of principles, to affimilate the heart thereunto. The Gofpcl doth not come in word only, but in power, and in the Holy Ghoft, 1 Thef. 1.5. A Divine power opens the heart, unlocks every faculty, diffolves the ftone which is in it, imprints the Holy Law there, and frames and new-moulds it into the image of God^and thus there comes forth a Church of Believers, or as the Apoftle (peaks, a church of the frft-bom which are written in heaven, Heb. 12. 23, and all this is from the Providence and good pleafure of God. Hence Saint Paul faith, That they are called according to his pur- pofe and grace, 2 Tim. 1.9. Saint James faith, That they are begotten of his own will , James 1. 18. Saint John faith, That they are born not of the will of man, but of God, John 1. 13. all is from the ivJW*, the good-will and pleafure of God. This Providence which watches over the Church, though it be a very fignal ■ 68 Of PROVIDENCE. Chap. 8. fignal one, and next to that over Chrift himfelf, hath ^^^r^J not wanted Adverfarics. Socinus faith, That Chrift Caput quidem the Head was predeftinatcd, but believers the Mcm- debuit 1 mem- ^ ers were not v Oorvtnus faith, That notwithftanding braautemnon the death of Chrift, it was poffible that there might niodo mcerta i oe no Church or believer. Grevinchovius allerts, fedetiam de- That Redemption might be impetrated for all, and bene. Prtua. applied to none becaufe of their incredulity. This go . cap, 14. Qpj n j on to me j s a ver y impious one. The Learned Fieri potuife, Junius obferves upon that of Socinus , That it is a ut nemo ho- portentous and monftrous thing , that there fhould chriftum ere- be an Head without a Body. And the Profeilors of derec, ac nulla key den * call that of Corzmus Dogma Mew* *5 $*■*>*- eflet Ecclefia. J , . j ui f u r\ ■ • cor. contr. Moi. W" > an opprobrious and blalphemous Opinion. The impiety of it appears in the foul confequences tuit We im- which flow from thence. petrata re- demptio, & tamen nullis applicari propter incredulitatetn. Grtvinch, contr: AmeJ. * Cenfur. fol, 289. i. It puts the lye upon the Promifes of God. He faid that Chrift (hould have a feed, Ift. 53. 105 and yet according to this opinion, he may be child left, and have none at all. He faid, That he fnould have the heathen for his inheritance, and the uttermoji farts of the earth for his poffejfion, Pfal. 2.85 and yet he may have nothing. He faid that he flmdd reign for ever, and of his kingdom there J/jou Id be no end^ Luk. 1.335 and yet by an utter failer of fubjefts he might not reign at all, and of his Kingdom there might be not Co much as a beginning. He faid , That he flwuld be head over all things to the church, Eph. 1.22 5 and yet he may have no body 5 nay, nor fo much as one poor member of it. Notwithftanding all the Pro- mifes, Of PRO V I D E N C E. 169 miles, he may be a Father without Children; an Chap. 8. Heir without an Inheritance 5 a King without Sub- jects 5 an Head without Members : And how can thefe things be ! Or how can God be true to his word, which is dearer to him than the whole frame of Heaven and Earth ! Neither will it falve the matter to fay, That in the event there was a Church, and fo much God foreknew : For if he foreknew it, it was a certain immutable thing. Meer Cafuals, fuch as may be or may not be, are not the objefts of Prefer- ence. If a Church might be, or might not be, as this Opinion would have it, it was not the objeft of Prefcience. If a Church would certainly be, then it is the objeft of Prefcience : but then this Tenet, that it might be, or not be, falls to the ground. However if we fuppofe a Prefcience, Prefcience is not Provi- dence : Neither, if there were there only nude Pre- fcience, would the Church in the event be from Pro- vidence , but from Chance 5 and then the confe- quence is, Chance, which made no Promife, performs all 5 God, who made the Promife, performs nothing. He is fo far from taking care about it, that he com- mits it to the Lottery of mans Will, whether there (hall be a Church or not. If the event hit right, yet God is never the truer } he never performed the pro- mite, he took no care about it 5 that thing, or rather Nothing, called Fortune, did order all. 2. This Opinion doth highly difparage Chriftand his precious Blood. Creatures, nay the higheft of them, Angels, may fail and mifs the mark; they have femina nihili, feeds of vanity and defeftibility in them: but for Jefus Chrift , who hath all the treafures of wifdom and power in himfelf, to fall fhort of his Z end. i 7 o Of ? ROVIDEN CE. Chap. 8. end, and fo, as it were, to fall from himfelf and his happineft. For him to lay the foundations of a Church in his own blood, and to have nothing built upon them : For him to make a Laver of his own blood, and to have never a foul wafhed in it : For him to procure the Holy Spirit, and to have never a Temple for it to dwell in, is a wonderful difparagement. The reflexion is in efteft, as if he were but a meer man, not wife or powerful enough to compafs his end, or compleat his work 5 as if his blood had no fpirit or divine virtue in it, effeftually to procure a Church and people to himfelf All which are below and ex- tremely unworthy of him, and the great work in his hands. Every little feed in nature hath a body gi- ven to it 5 and yet according to this opinion, the Son of God might fow his own Blood and RighteouP nefs, and have none at all. A cup of cold water gi- ven in charity, hath its reward 3 and yet the Blood of Chrift poured out in a tranfcendent excels of love, may want it. 3. This cafts a foul blot upon Providence, that, fuch is its accuracy, reaches to every thing in nature, even to fuch minute things as hairs and fparrows$ yet according to this opinion it negle&s Chrifts blood more worth than a World, and the iffue of it. It was the horrible folly of the Emperor Dotntiian, to Ipend his time in catching of Flies, while he negle<3> ed the great things of the Empire. And what juft a- pology can be made for Providence, if it wake and watch over the Sun, Moon, Stars, Meteors, Beads, Plants, nay over the very Gnats and minute creatures, while it (lumbers and sleeps over the fufferings of the Son of God } How much more tolerable were a negleft Of PROVIDENCE. 171 negleft of all creatures, than of that one concern, Chap. 8, which is a thing of infinite moment ! If we believe \> ~ that Providence took no care about fo great a thing as Chrifts death, how can we perfwade our felves that it fhould refpeft the creatures, which are infi- nitely below it ? A greater failure irr government there cannot be, than this, to be accurate in trifles, and negleftive in momentous things. Again, Provi- dence reaches to the end of things } it doth not go part of the way only, but condufts them totheir end: yet according to this opinion, it doth not do fo in a thing of more confequence than all the world. It watched over the genealogy, birth, life, death, refur- re&ion of Chrift 5 but then it made a (land, taking no care what the iflue or fruit of all this (hould be, after all was done : whether Chrift fhould have a Church, or fo much as one believer in all the world, was not determined by Providence, but left to the Lottery of mans Will. A greater defed cannot be imagined than this, To do great admirable things, and then not to regard what (hall become of them. I (hall fay no more to this opinion, but conclude , That a very great Providence did watch over the ifliie of Chrifts death, that a Church might be (ecured unto him. But becaufe it may be faid , That the Provi- dences over Chrift and the Church are, though great, yet but particular ones , I (hall proceed to the next thing. 3. All other Providences may be reduced to the other two. As God hath a fpecial eye upon Chrift and the Church, fo he orders other things to be lome way or other fubfervient unto them. I fhall in brief touch upon the reduction of other Provi- Z 2 dences l7 2 Of PROVIDE NCE. Chap. 8. dences, firft,to that over Chrift,and then to that over c<— n^*o the Church. Firft , Other Providences are to be reduced to that over Chrift. It was an ancient faying of the Jews, That the World was made for the Mejfiah. The Apoftle tells us expresly, That all things were created by him and for him, Col. i. 16. That Providence which was over him , being the Mafter-piece, the higheft Providence that ever the Sun law, muft in all reafbn be the rule of the reft, in that we have the nobleft profpeft of God and the creature, the Di- vine Attributes fet forth in their glory, and a crea- ture, an human nature, elevated to the higheft pitch : unto that therefore other Providences are to be re- ferred. To give fbme inftances : God permitted A- dam to fall and break his beautiful image of Holi- nefs all to pieces : and why did he permit it? doubt- Quisaudeat lefs he could have upheld man in his integrity 3 no credere aut m an dares deny it : doubtlefs he permitted it not ir- Angdusneqf rationally 5 his will is ever irradiated with infinite homo cade- wifdom :. What account then may be given of it? If ret, in Dei^ zn y at a jj ^ e given, I fuppofe a better reafbn cannot faitfe? 4uft.d§ be given than this, That he permitted it, that way civ: vet, 1.14. m ight be made for the coming of his Son in the flefh: Hence that fpeech, frlix culpa, qu£ tantum meruit Insm. 1. 2. redemptoreml EJiius gives other reafons } but this vtfantt. 23. ^ith hej is ratio omnium potijjima, the chief reafbn of all, That God might be made man. The Learn- Comment* in ed Zanchy faith, Certum efi, It is certain that evil was M. 1. v. 16. p erm itted, that the Son of God might take our flefh. But to go on : After the fall, the Providence which watched over Noah, Abraham, Judah, Ruth, David, with others the Anceftors of our Saviour, did look at OfPROVIDENCE. 173 at that excellent one who was to come from thence : Chap. 8. nay, that Providence which keeps the whole world in its being and order, refpefts him and his Satisfa- ction. JufVtce would, if unfatisfied,have dafhed down the World about the finners cars 5 but it is preferved upon the account of Chrift: it ftands notnowmeerly by Power, but by Blood. Redemption is a buttrefs to Creation, to keep it from (inking into a Chaos. By Chrift all things confift, Col. f. 17, not only fubfift in their beings, but confift in their orders. The blef- fings and profperitics which Providence difpenfesand doles out unto finners, are all founded upon him. It is obfervable in the Old Teftament, that they uied this order in praying for bleffings, The Lord he with you : Thus Boaz to the Reapers, Ruth 2.4, The Lord be with y on 5 or, which is all one,77>e Lord he with us. Thus Solomon in his famous prayer, The Lord our God he with us, 1 King. 8.57. The form of words falls in with the precious Name of our Saviour, Immanuel, or God with us. Were it not for Chrift the true Imma- nuel, God would not be with us at all to beftow any bleffing upon us 5 but becaufe he is with us in the.in- carnate Word, therefore he is with us to blefs us. It may alfo be noted, That the Mercies and Deliveran- ces which the Jews, Cods own people, had under the Old Teftament, either had a type of the great Salva- tion graven upon them, or elfe had a promife of the Meffiah interwoven with them. They were deliver- ed out of Egypt, but that was a type of deliverance by Chrift. Joftma brought them into Canaan, but that was a type of entring into Heaven by Chrift. God promi(ed them deliverance from Rezin and Pekah^ but the promife of the Meffiah was interwoven with it, i-74 Of PROVIDENC E. Chap. 8. it. Ifa. 7. 14, he comforted them againft a dark and troubleous time, but he ufhers in the promife of the Meffuhjfc.y.t.kll their temporal deliverances pointed to the great Salvation. The Apoftle tells us,That God doth gather together in one, or fum up, all things in Chrifi, Eph. 1. 10. In him the types had their truth, the Promifes were Yea and Amen. The Law had its end, all was fummed up in him. In a word 5 all the Temporals in the World , all the Spirituals in the Church are founded upon him : He is the great Cen- ter, where all things concur and meet together. Again, other Providences are to be reduced to that over the Church , as being next to that over Chrift the mod excellent Providence of all. The Saints, which make up the Church, are Gods Jewels. His peculiar ones, his Jedidiahs, or beloved ones, the Apple of his eye 5 a fpecial Providence muft needs watch over them : He is called the Cod of Abraham Jfaac and Jacob, Cujus omnes gentes font, quafi trium hominum Dens ejjet, faith St. Auflin. He, whofe all Nations are, was the God of three men, a fpecial care was over them 5 no wonder if other Providen- ces carry a refpeft to them, they are graven upon the palms of his hands, //rf.49. 16. In all the works which he fets his hand unto, he remembers and bears a re- fped to them $ the whole world fares the better for them. The Jews fay, That the righteous are the foun- dation of the rwrld, they bear up the pillars of it, PfaL 75. 3. SanUum femenftatumen terr£, holy men do in a fort bear up the world. Jacob tells Laban, That the Lord had blejjed him f nee his comings in the Original it is *Srh at my foot, Gen. 30.30. Good men procure a bleffing, and their Mafters are bleffed at their feet : re- Of P ROV ID ENC E. 175 remarkable is that in Mofes's Song, When the mo(i £f^ high divided to the nations their inheritance, when he ^ na P* "« Jeparated the Sons of Adam, he fit the bounds of the peo- ple according to the number of the children of Ifracl, Deut. 32. 8. When the world was divided, Gen. 10. Ifrael was not in being 5 yet a fpecial refpedT: was had of him, that the Canaanites fhould have as much land, as fhould be fufficient for Ifrael, who afterwards was to inherit it. The Jews fay, that the 70 fouls which went into Egypt were worth as much as the 70 Na- tions of the world: to be fure in proportioning out the world, God had a Angular refpecl: to his own people^ nay, he refpefted them not only in fetting the outward bounds of the Nations, but in limiting their inward delires alfb. Thus God affures them, that when they came up to appear before him, no man fhould defire their land, Exod. 34. 24. For their fakes Providence would not only keep off the hands of the Nations round about them,but ftint their wills, and curb their very concupifcences. The Apoftle, to fhew how great a (hare Believers have in Provi- dence, tells us in one place, That all things worh^ to- get her for their goad, Rom. 8. 28. The great plot of Providence is to make all fervethem: and in another, that all things are theirs, whether Paul, or Apollo, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things prefent, or things to come : all are yours, and you arc Chrifls, and Chrijl is Gods, 1 Cor. 3. 22, 23, being joynt-heirs with Chrift the heir of all things, they become in a flibordinate fenfe heirs of all. Fi deli bus totus mundus divitiarum eft 5 the Saints have all the world for their pofTeffion, at lcaftfuch a proportion of it as mod: con- duces to their happinefs. If it were poffible, faith Dl i 7 5 Of PROVIDENCE. Chap. 8. Dr. Reynolds, for any Member of Chrift to ftand ab- o-~v~^ folutely in need of the ufe and fervice of the whole ZSffiS 1 * Creation. All the Creatures in the world (hould un- doubtedly wait upon him, and be appropriated unto him. The Moon (hould ftand ftill, the Sun go back, the Lyons fhould ftop their mouths, the fire (hould give over burning, the Ravens (hould bring him meat, the Heavens (hould rain down bread, the Rocks [hould gu(h out with water, all the Creatures (hould mufter up themfelves to defend the body of Chrift. Thus that excellent perfon. One thing more, as a feal to all the reft, may be noted, Chrift the head of the Church hath all the power in heaven and in earth, Mat. 28. 18. He is head over all things to the Church, Eph. 1.22. The Church is the primary mark and (cope of his Government 5 therefore he rules with an eye up- on it, and orders other things in a way (ubfervient to it. Having (een the Divine Providence manifefted in Chrift, I (hall now confider what Objeftions or Ex- ceptions have been made againft Providence, and how and in what manner they are folved in Chrift. Firft, Epicurus denied a Providence : God, faith he, hath no bufwefs, at leajl not in the lower world. This he (aid, as Gregory Nyjfen obferves, becaufe he would not have God to be Creator of the World 5 and if he were not Creator, how (hould he be a Provifor ? The fundamental reafon, why Epicurus denied a Pro- vidence, was, that opinion of his 5 that an infinite number of Atoms dancing in inanity, did at laft by a fortunate chance meet together in a world. To this opinion a no-Providence beft accords, a world made by chance (hould be ruled (b : Why (hould God rule in a world Of PROVIDENCE. i 77 world not of his own making? But that opinion in it Chap. 8. fclf is very monftrous and abfurd, Atoms did by good fortune make a world. But, as an ancient hath it, 7Jf?de ? ft a cor pi jail a ? whence came thefe lucky Atoms ? Are they Temporal or Eternal things? If Temporal, they muft: own a Maker whom they op- pofe^ If Eternal, they muft be invariable, that is, dance on in their inanity, and never fit down in a world. How fhould Atoms, if eternal, produce fo imperfeft a thing as chance^ or chance, fo irregular in it felf, produce fiich an harmonious order as is in the world ? May the blind Particles of matter rally themfelves into a world ? or which way {hould they fink into an Earth, melt into a Sea, fpread into a Fir- mament, inflame themfelves into a Sun, Moon, and Stars, and fubtiliate themfelves into Life, Senfe, and Reafon? It is fareafier to believe, that Letters fhould cafually caft themfelves into an 'accurate Poem 3 or that Stones and Timber (hould happily lay their heads together in a delicate ftrufrurc, than that Atoms fhould chance to meet and fettle in a world incom- parably tranfccnding all humane Arts and Compo- fures > And could a world be fo made, how (hould it be fecured? Who (hall clip the Wings of thofe Atoms, or chain them to their feats, that they may not fly away from their bodies , and dance again in inanity ? It being moft rational, that a world made by chance fhould be fo dilTolved. Reafon tells us, that in this opinion we have nothing but an heap of abfurdities 5 but Scripture tells us, That the World was not made by Chance, but by Chrift the Eternal Word and Wifdom of the Father 5 .in whom, as the Schoolmen fay, was the Eternal Idea of all things^ A a accor- ~~% Of PROVIDENCE. Chap. 8. according to which, as the grand Exemplar, all were u#— v" - "*^ made : The Eternal Wildom, which comprized all in it felf, produced all in time. Another objeftion which Epicurus made againft Providence, was this : God, being blejjed in himfelf mufi not trouble or dijparage himfelf by taking care of tkefe inferior things. But this is as great non-fenle as the other : What ! can there be trouble in a pure Aft, in one who can do every thing by a word of power, who needs only to (peak, and the thing is done ? May there be a difparagement in ruling over what he hath made? Are not thefe inferior things the works of his hands . Or what more pofitively decreed , or more highly momentous to the whole world, than the fufFerings of our Saviour ? Yet thefe things being to come to pals by the free afts of men, and thofe free afts not being under Pro- vidence, the event muft needs be pendulous and un- certain, as thofe free afts upon which the event de- A a 2 pends ? 180 Of T ROVIDEN CE. _ — * Chap. 8. pends, are. Providence, having no foveraign domi- c*— \^"*^ nion over thofe free a&s , doth not afcertain the E- vent, but leave it dubious and fluctuating till the hu- man Will determines it felf : And what is this, but to make Providence nothing, and man an independent Agent ? And whither doth this tend, but to the ut- ter fubverfion of Piety ? We fhould fay in piety, If Ener. de lib. the Lord will, we will do this or that, Jam. 4. 1 55 but Arb.c. 2. according to this opinion, God himfelf may fay, If man will, I will do this or that. This made the £1- De Caufa Dei mous Bradwardine juftly cry out, guts enim Theclogi- L a.c. 30. ens ant Catholicns, imo vel Hrfreticns, Schifmaticns ant Paganns andeat fe pr^*nj vcns are higher than the Earth, fo his thoughts are above ours , and therefore the one may eafily be con- ceived to encircle the other} to fay, that the humane Will, without a damage to its liberty, is not ruleable by Providence , is to fay, that infinite Wifdom and Power have pofed themfelves in making fuch a crea- ture as they could not govern without deftroying its faculties: and to fay, that the humane Will, though ruleable by Providence, is not fo ruled , is to fay, that the great King of kings, and Lord of lords hath ■■« voluntarily, and without any neceffity for it, waved his Principality over his nobkft creatures, over the wills and hearts of men. 2. That Providence and humane Liberty (hould confift together, is neceflary on all hands. On Gods part, that he may rule like a God over the nobleft creatures 5 that the great things, which were to be brought forth through the free afts of men, might come to pafs, as became Providence, in a fure and infallible way : on mans part, that he may ad, though as a man rationally, yet as a creature dependently up- on God 5 that he may humbly acknowledge that all I his liberty is but a drop or little beam from him who is the fountain of Power, and therefore muft hang upon him in its being and working. Free-will is a principle to his own operations 5 yet, as the School- men fpeak, it is prwcipitm Jnb Deo & feji Devm, a Bon. inSeac. principle under God and after God. L 2 - di P* 2 ^ 3. The fuavity and congruity of Providence re- conciles the matter. God doth not ruin his creatures in the ruling of them, nor deftroy his works that he may ,84 Of PK0V1DENC E. Chap. 8 may fulfil his will, TjSro/a 7»* 4**Ya «t»* JiKTtKov , that the Son of God was capable of Vice and Virtue. Thus fome others have affirmed, That Chrift as man might not have obeyed. But the Council of Nice pronounced an Anathema Socm. l.i.c.t againft Arias for that opinion , as being one of his blafphemies. It's very miferable that men fhould have no higher thoughts of Chrift than fo. To fay, That Chrift might have finned, or, which is all one, to fay, That he might not have obeyed, is to lay, That tfrere might have been a difcord between the Father and the Son, a repugnancy between the Divine and Hu- B b man iS6 Of PKOVID ENCE. Chap. 8. man wills in Chrift : That the admirable Hypoftati- cal union of the two natures in him, might have been broken and diffolved : That his human nature might have loft and forfeited the rich anointings and over-meafures of the Spirit which were upon it : That the great work of Redemption and Salvation in his hands, might have failed and come to nothing: Nay, and that our glorious Redeemer and Saviour might by his fin have ftood in need of one to lave and redeem him. All which fhew the black blafphemies which are couched in that opinion. To fay no more of it, I conclude, That Providence rules over the free afts of men, and that without any violence put upon their liberty : Men aft freely, and yet de* pendently upon God the primordial Caule. The next objeftion made againft Providence, is this : If there w T ere a Providence, How or which way fhould it come to pais, that the wicked (hould profper, and the good be aftlifted ? This obje&ion daggered the Heathens, that many of them denied a Providence upon this account. If there were a Providence, lay they, Why had Phalark T$/ or Dionyfius a Kingdom ? Why Rutilius ox Camillas a banilhment ? Why Socrates a Cup of Poylbn? When they faw bloody impure Tyrants fitting upon the Throne, when good and juft men tofs'd with mi- feries, and expoled to great afflidions , they hence concluded, That there was no fuchthing as Provi- dence ruling over the world : Hence that of the Poet, Cum rapunt mala fata bonos, ignofcite faJJo r Sollicitor nnllos ejje futan Deos* Hence Minucim T& lix OfPROFIDENCE. 187 Hence when Pompcy in a good caufe wanted fuccefs, Chap. 8. a did complaint was made, That, (res divinas multum habere caligini*) Providence, if any thing at all, was very dark. Nay, this obje&ion was a fcruple to the Saints under the Old Teftament. Hence thofe cxpo- ftulations, Wherefore do the wicked live, become old,yea are mighty in power ? Job 21.7. Behold, thefe arc the ungodly who profper j in the world, they encreafe in riches, Pfal. 73. 12. nherefore doth the way of the wicked pro jper ly, I 8. harmlefs, merciful, zealous, heavenly, obedient, pati- ent was he! how fair and lovely in all Graces was he? what a divine light and luftre did his Virtues caft forth into the World ! how attractive and ravifhing were the Pcrfe&ions Alining out in him ! What Ser- mons did he preach ! What Cures did he do ! What was his life but a continual doing of good ! Who, where is the man that ever was fo profitable to Man- kind, or Co obliged the Vvorld as he did ! And yet how was he ufed ! What entertainment did he meet withal here ! He was defpifed, rejected, a man of forrows, acquainted with griefs 5 extreme poor, not having where to lay his head: at laft he was arraign- ed, falfly accufed, unjuftly condemned, fpit upon, buffeted, mocked, nailed to a tormenting Crofs, there to breathe out his laft. Never didlnnocency fo fuffer as here, and yet never did Providence fhew it felf in fuch glory,in and by the fufFerings of this Holy One \ the great work of Redemption was accomplish .d 5 his Stripes were healing ones 5 his Blood a laver to wafh finners 5 his Crofs was a triumphant conqueft over Death and Hell 5 his Sacrifice made a perfect a- tonement 5 his Sufferings anfwered for the fin and fuffering of a World. His forrows made way for good tydings 5 his fhame procured glory for us 5 his con- demnation was in order to our abfblution 5 his po- verty was to enrich us with grace and glory. This was the very Mafterpiece of Providence 5 never did the Sun fee fuch an incomparable defign as here, out of death comes life 5 out of the fufferings of an holy righteous perfbn,rifcs up an eternal fpring of blefflngs and all good things. The 7JT~ Of PRO VI DEN CE. Mure ion, 1.2. Chap. 8. The laft Objection made againft Providence is thfc : cf-v-*o If there is a Providence, v'ofcv t3 **xbn whence is that nus* & pr*fc£ greateft of evils, fin ? Providence rightly and wifely us fmuri, & difpofes of things, fin is an horrible and monftrous frowns 1 l cu"r atax y anc ^ confufion, fuch as makes the Earth without hominem & form and void, Jer. 4. 23. as if the old Chaos were quidem ima- come again 5 and how comes it to pafs that fuch an pTruTe^iabi. inordinate thing fliould be in the world ? It was the Ten. Jdverf. Objection of Maraon, * That if God were good, and foreknowing of futures, and able to avert evil, he would not have fuffered man to fall. In anfwer to this Objection, it is to be premifed, That God is not, nor cannot be the author of fin : God is light, fin darknefs} God purity, fin unclean- nefs 5 God omnipotency,fin imbecillity 5 God a pure aft,fin a defeft.Sin cannot be from fuch an one as he is$ neverthelefs it is clear that finful actions do not fall out altogether without a Providence. The Scripture is very pregnant herein: Jofeph's Brethren fell him in- to Egypt ^ but God lent him thither, Gen. 45. 5. Shi- met curfed David^ but God bid him do fo, 2 Sam.16. 11. Abjalom lies with his Fathers Concubines, but God faid, I will do it, 2 Sam. 12. 12. a lying fpirit deceived Ahab^ but God faid, Go and do fo, 1 King. 22. 22. Thus and much more faith the holy Book, but neither is Reafbn filent herein 5 I fhall therefore offer two things. 1. It was a determinate Verity, and that before the event, that fa ch and fuch finful aft ions fhould come to pais 5 a Verity it could tiot be without a Providential purpofe, for then it would be an inde- pendent, felf-originated, unpreventable truth 5 the thing muft come to pafs whether God would or no : i That Of PRO V IDENC E. 191 That which is of it felf,and a kind of originc to it felf, Chap can have no impediment 5 it will exift and be a kind of avrvf'd., or felf-fubfiilent : to avoid which abfiir- ditics I take it to be neceflary to (ay, that fuch a ve- rity cannot be without a Providence. 2. The greater number of humane actions are (in- fill, and if all thefe were exempt from Providence, how could Providence rule the World ? If Cod were the author of fin,he could not judg the world^becaufe he could not be author and ultor refpe&u ejujdem 5 but if fin fall out without a Providence,he could not rule the World, becaufe the major part of humane aftions are evil. But feeing it is certain, that Providence is for be- ing and order, and that fin is an ataxy and confufion, I (hall give a more diftinft anfwer to this Objection 5 and here the light muft be divided from the darknefs. In a finful aftion there are three things confiderable.I mean theanomy,or ataxy,the entity,& the order of it 1. The anomy or ataxy is meer darknels, it is a de- feft, and only from a deficient agent^it is UtSv }JW,as . th£ expreffion is, Job. 8. 44. of a mans own : Crea- tura habct rcdire ad non ejfe a fe, the creature falls from its defeftibility and pravity 5 here Providence is only a permiflbr 5 on the one hand it is certain, that no fin can pofiibly come to pais without a per- miffion. If God differ it not , no man can wrong Ifrael, PJal. 105.14. And, which is left than an injurious aft, Balaam cannot curie her, Numb. 22. 38. And, which is yet lefsthan a curfing word, the idolatrous Nations cannot defire her Land, Exod. 34. 24. Let a man be in never 16 great a phrenfie of lurf, God can hedg and wall him up that he (hall not find bis i 9 2 Of P KOV 1DENCE. Chap. 8. his paths. On the other hand it is certain, that God is only a permifior of the anomy or ataxy, it is not from him as a caule : the creature being defeftible in it felf, and under a law diftinft from it felf, may fail and fill Ihort of the rule 5 but God who hath no o~ ther law but his perfeftion, and can no more decline from his reftitude than his being., is a meer permiflor. 2. The entity in a (inful action, though coexiftent with the anomy,is to be diftinguiihed from it 5 befides the anomy there is aliquid nature, fomewhat of pofi- tive being. This I think is clear: though an ad as it refpefts the law, and is in lima morali, may be (inful } yet as it is an aft, and confidered in linea fhyfica^ it cannot be fuch 5 for fo it is but the meer complement of a natural faculty, and that complement cannot in it felf be finful, becaufe the God of nature cannot be the author of fin. The anomy or finfulnels dwells not alone,but in alieno fundo in fome natural good. Ori- ginal finfulnels is an inmate in the natural faculties 5 aftual finfulnels is an inmate in fome aftion or motion. The aftion is inordinate, but it is not the inordinati- on, the inordination is a privation, but the aft is not (b, the aft is a pofitive thing, but the inordination is not fo 5 the aft is the fubjeft of the inordination 5 therefore it is not the very inordination it felf. Now there being fuch a diftinftion in finfulaftions between the entity and the anomy, the entity or motion mull be from God the firft being and mover. Arminius him- felf would have it, Z)t totus a&us rite Providently fubjiciatur, qua aU m efficiently qua peccatum pern/it tenti Providentia* As to the malice Providence permits , but as to the aftion or motion it operates 5 no parti- cle of being can be produced without it, fuch per- * fons Of~T~R 0V1DENCE. Ipi fbns as are by illegitimate generation, are doubtlefs Chap. 8. Gods creatures, and that becaufe the generating aft, t^-v^ as it is an aft, is from God. 3. The order is confiderable : In finful aftions all is not meer ataxy 5 God hath an holy Line in the midft of the diforder. In Monfters there are aberrati- ons of particular natures, yet Providence is not mifta- ken. In fins, which are moral monftrofities, the fin- ning-creature is inordinate ^ yet Providence is not without an order touching the fame. And here we may take notice of a double order 5 the one looks backwards, and that is the Order of Penalty : The other looks forward, and that is the Order of Con- ducibility. I (hall a little touch upon each of thefe. 1. The Order of Penalty is confiderable, and that under a double notion 5 the one is this : A finful a- ftion is pwna ftbiipfi , a punifhment to it felf. Juf- fifti^ Domine^ & fie eft^ ut pzna fibi fit omnk inordina- A „ ~Uis animus^ An inordinate mind is a punifhment to cap/ 12. it felf. Sin ( faith the fubtil Scotus ) as it is fluent tib.2.Dift.37; from the will, is fin 5 but as it is refident in the will, it is punifhment. Or thus : As it fights and wars a- gainft the Law, it is fin 5 but as it debafes and de- turpates the foul in its beauty and ferenity, it is pu- nifhment. 4, man cannot fin againft God, but he wrongs his foul, Prov. 8. 36. Jerufakm cannot make Idols againft God , but (he doth it againft her felf too, Ezekr 22. 3. in refpeft of this penalty. God doth not fuffer dedecuspecati effe fine decore jitftit7 yet on Gods there was juftice, righteoufiiels, and a defign of incomparable love to fave the world : Hence it is faid, That Herod, and Pilate, and the Gentiles,and the people of Ifrael, were gathered together to do what- foever Gods hand and Gods counfel determined before to be done, Afts 4. 27, 28. Never was there (6 hor- rible a fin, never fo fignal a Providence as here.Some Divines do here diftinguifh thus ; The paflion of Chrift was decreed, but the crucifiers aftion was not. Others will not admit this diftin&ion. Beza againft Cafie/Iio fays, That common fenfe is againft it. Cha- mier thinks that natural light is againft it. I coafefi that I cannot fatisfie my felf with it. Are the A&ion and Paffion really diftinft ? May the one be without the other ? May Providence be, as becomes it r per- fed:, if it determine an Effeft without a Caufe^orthat C c 2 Chrift i 9 6 Of PROVIDENCE. Chap. 8. Chrift fhould be (lain, and not by whom ? Afcheme of one Decree hath been let down from Heaven to us, whofe accuracy is confiderable, i King. 22. there God did not only decree that Ahab fhould be per- fwaded to go up and fall at Rawoth-Gilead, but that it (hould be done by the hardeft medium, by a Lying* fpirit commiffionated to go and prevail. And may we think Providence more accurate touching a judg- ment on one wicked man , than it is touching the Redemption of the World by Chrift ? and yet will it not be more accurate, if in the one the mode and perfon by whom the thing fhould be done , be de- signed, and not in the other ? Suppofe the Action and Paffion to be diftinct , yet is not the Paffion a dependent on the Action ? And if the Action be cafual, mud not the Paffion be fo too ? And if the Paffion only be decreed, muft not the Action be ca- fiial ? That Action which is altogether undecreed ( I mean, there being no Decree of permiffion upon which the Action as a confequent doth enfue) is un- determined by God 3 and (becauie there is no mid- dle Determinator ) that which is undetermined by God, muft remain undetermined, till man determines it, that is, till it be done, or at leaft in fieri? and that wfych is undetermined till then, is cafual to the very moment of its exiftence - y that is, as cafual as any thing can be. And if the Action be cafual, thePafi lion, which is a pendent upon it, muft befotoo^ and if the Paffion be cafual, it muft be undetermined and undecreed as well as the Action 5 and fo Providence, while denied in the one, is fiibverted in both. But to fay no more to that diftinction , we fee clearly in the Sufferings of Chrift, how admirable Providence is Of PROVIDENCE. Ip7 is } in and about the very fins of men. There God was Chap. 8. wile while man was foolifh} God merciful while man cruel 5 God juft while man unrighteous 5 the light was Gods, and the darknefs mans 5 the order Gods, and the ataxy mans 5 the throne and foveraign domi- . nion Gods, the fin and rebellion mans. Wicked pro- jects were turned about to juft ends, vile aftions were over-ruled to excellent purpofes 5 at that very death of Chrift, in which (b many impious hands thruft themfelves, Providence was not abfent, but put in its holy hand and counfcl to bring forth the glorious work of Redemption and Salvation out of it. One thing more may be noted} we have a pregnant proof of Providence in the pious pofture of our fuf- fering Saviour. When he was under the unjuft and bloody hands of men, he looked above and beyond them to the hand and Providence of God 5 when Pi- late told him, That he had power to crucifie him, he an- fwered, That Pilate could have no power at all againji him, except it were given him from above, Toh. 19, 11. As touch as* to fay, Unlefs it had been Gods determi- nate counfel, a thoufand Pilates could have done no- thing at all. When the Jews poured out horrid blas- phemies and injuries, he was as a meek Lamb, dumb, he opened not his mouth. Indeed there were tears and ftrong-crys to God,but no murmurs or complaint? of men 5 he looked above them to the pleafure of his Father : When he was reviled, he reviled not again $ when hefaffered, he threat ned not, but committed him* filfto him that judgeth righteoufly, 1 Pet. 2.23. O rare Mirrour of Faith and Patience ! He knew wham he had to do withal, his eyes were not upon men, but God 5 not upon tbeir wicked projects, but upon his Fathers 75s~ Of PROVID ENCE. Chap. 8. Fathers wife counfel. In all his fufferings he fully ac« quiefced in his Fathers pleafure , faying, Not my will, but thine be done. Further, we may obferve, That the Saints have ever owned a Providence watching over the injuries of men. God fent me, faith Jofeph : The Lord hath taken away, faith Job : The Lord bid him curfe, faith David : Thou haji ordained them for judgment, faith Habakkyk. of the Chaldees. Still they look up to the hand of Providence in fuch events, exercifing them- felves in holy fear, faith, patience, prayer towards God. Were there not a Providence, what (hould the Saints do ? which way could they turn themfelves for comfort ? in a ftorm of Perfecution what doth their fear do ? it terminates not on man but God, and that upon very good reafon 5 becaufe man is but, as Attila called himfeif, Flagellum Dei, the ftaff or rod in the hand of God the great Moderator : but if there be no fuch thing as Providence, the ftaff is no longer in Gods hand, but in mans 5 he may do what he plea- fes. Hence in fuch a cafe it looks like a piece of rea- ibnable Idolatry to fear man who determines the e- vent 5 and like a piece of reafonlefi piety to fear God, who doth juft nothing at all : and what doth their faith do } they fly under the Almighty fhadow, and fix their faith as a rare engine, upon that Angu- lar Providence, which runs towards them in a more than ordinary fweetnefs through the Covenant of Grace : in this pofture they ftand as fecure, as if by Divine art they could remove the troublous Earth in- to a quieter ubi,or at leaft be untroubled in the trou- bles of it. But if there be no Providence, what can they do ? their fhadow is departed, their faith which may Of P ROV ID ENC E. \ 99 may not take fo low a center as earth or man, hath Chap. 8, no Providence or place in Heaven to fatten it felf up- on, it being irrational to flay on the mercy or power of him who doth juft nothing in fuch events 5 Faith now is no more it felf but a dream or fancy about fome Providence or invifible hand which is not: and what (hall their patience do ? in fuch cafes they ufe to lay themfelves down at Gods feet, as Lambs not opening their mouths 5 or clfe (peaking low, and as it were out of the duft of creature-vilenefs, in fome fiich fubmiflive terms as thofe of Ely, It k the Lord, let him do what feemeth him good $ an excellent pofture for a creature under the great Governour ! But if he govern not, patience is no more it felf 5 neither un- der man, a meer fellow-creature, fhould it be in fb low a pofture : it is a Grace which can live no-where but under Providence. The taking away of Provi- dence ruins patience in the very foundation, no lefs than the taking away of precepts doth obedience. And what can their prayer do ? it can unlock Heaven, and by importuning the Governour of the World do great things : but if God rule not, it is but a meer in- fignificant thing 5 no tolerable account can be given, why in fuch cafes they fhould addrefs themfelves to him who is no Moderator. Thus we fee that the Do- ftrine of Providence is of great moment to the Gra- ces of the Saints. I fhall conclude all with the pious words of two Emperours 5 the one is Mauritius, who feeing his Wife and Children murder'd, faid, Jvjfos es, Domine, jujla judicia tna % The other is Maxim? li* an, who in the time of Pope Julius the fecond, ex- preffed his thoughts touching Providence thus, T)ats &terne ! mH vigil arcs, qna; ftill our eyes fhould be lifted up above inftru- mcnts to that wife Providence which orders all. In all the great affairs of the Church and the World let us ftill hold to this, the Lord reigneth, Pfal. 93. i. Pro- vidence governs the World, and all in it: herefies and bloody pcHecutions may break out as a flood, yet Truth (hall ftand, and the Church built upon it. In a word, feeing God is univerfal Governour, we fhould fear him in every place, eye him in every work, fub- mit to him in every event, depend upon him in every eftate, and glorifie him in all his adminiftrations. This is indeed to confefs his Kingdom which ruleth over all, and practically to own his Providence, which fweetly and ftrongly diipoles all things to his own Praife and Glory. Dd CHAR Chap. 9. CHAP. IX. The Doffrine of Original fw^ the great moment of it. AdamV (in imputed to us. The proof of it from Scrip- ture. AdamV capacity. AdamV righteoufnefs. Obje- ctions anfwered. Our inherent pravity. The proof of it from Scripture. The experience of our hearts. The aUual fins in the world. The doUrwe of Original (in manife fled from Chrijis extraordinary Conception. His Hcadjhip oppofed to AdamV, from the injiitution cf Baptifm. The wickgdnefs of the Jews in crucifying of Chrifi. The purchafe of Regeneration and Salvation made by Chrifi. A flwrt improvement of this Do- Brine. I N the next place I (hall proceed to confider Origi* nal fin, the Do&rine of which is very momentous. The Pfalmijl in the fourteenth Pfalm notably fets forth the corrupt eftate of man by nature:, and again, he fets it forth in the 53. Pfal. almoft in the fame words, pointing out to us the great necefllty and u- tility of this Doftrine, which admirably tends to un- Moll. Com. in deceive and deliver us from that fafcinating opinion FfcL 53. of our own righteoufnefs and worthiness, which too much charms the hearts of all men 5 and withal to prepare and make us ready to accept a cure from Chrifi:, and his regenerating Grace. This is a moft ne- De peccat.Or. ceffary fundamental Doftrine. St. Aujlin fpeaking of lib. 2. cap.24. Ad am anc j Chrift, faith, In horum duorum hominum caufa proprie fides Ckrijliana confiflit : the Chriftian faith ftands in the knovvledg of thofe two men 5 the * one Of Original Sin. 205 one the fpring of fin and death 5 the other the fpring Chap. 9. of grace and life. And fpeaking of the Pelagians as k^^t-^j denying Original fin, he charges them, fundament a Epift. 90, &• Cbrijiiana fidei cvertere, to overturn the foundations 9 * of the Chriftian faith. Without the knowledg of this fin, that excellent rule, yv2$t turn** know thy felf, becomes altogether impracticable 5 a man though near to his own foul, is a ft ranger to it 5 though he hath a refle&ing faculty, yet he cannot make a true infpe&i- /O , \ on into hisyhearfclhe fees only his outfide: within there r^ '*" is a deadly wound ,yet he feels it not 5 a fink, a chaos of corruptions, yet he perceives it not : that holy image which was the beauty and pure re&itude of his nature, is departed and gone 5 yet he is not con- cerned at it. He is, as Nazia?;zen fpeaks, totus lapfus y all fallen, all out of order 5 yet it feems to him as if all were well and in a due pofture: he is miferable, and poor, and blind, and naked, and yet infenfible in all thefe , according to that falfe or rather no-judg- ment that he hath of himfelf : he is happy in his mi- fery, rich in his poverty, feeing in his blindnefs, beau- tiful in his fhame and fpiritual nakednefi , in the midft of ftraits and neceflities he finds no need of Chrift, or regenerating grace : the neceflity and ex- cellency of thefe appears in fuch proportion as the depth and breadth of that fin is apprehended to be. Hence it is obfervable on the one hand, Thofe who own Adam to be a fountain of fin and death,do with- al own Chrift to be a fountain of righteoufnefs and life. Thofe who fee the horrible ataxy and pravity in our nature, fee alfo the neceflity and excellency of Grace in the repairing of it. On the other hand the Pelagians and Sccinians, who deny Original fin, are Dd 2 enemies 204 Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. enemies to Graces it is in the power and will of man, i^-^v — +J velnitere flore virtutum, vel .fentibus horrere vitiorum^ chriftc.TsT' to ma ^ e himfelf beautiful with the flowers of virtue,- or horrid with the brambles of vice. So Pelagius. In no fir -a potcjiate jitum eft, nt Deo obtemperemus, it is in Cap. io. our p 0wer to obey God. So the Racovian Catechift. And what room is there for Grace, when the power Hb^ctp^T/' and free-will of man may do the work ? The Pela- gian s affirmed, that before the Law men were faved by Nature, afterwards by the Law, afterwards by J« D 3 f «pT Chrift - The damans fay, that under the Old Tefta- " ment good men were faved without any refpeft to Chrift or faith in him, and what need then was there of Chrift, or his fatisfaftory fufferings for us ? the great work might be done without him. Hence it ap- pears that to deny Original fin is to caft off Chrift and Grace. The Jewi/h Rabbins, who made the evil fig- ment in mans heart to be but a light matter, fmall as a thread, weak as a woman, ruleable by the good fig- mfent of our own reafon, were very ignorant of that great point of Regeneration. Hence Nicodemus a Ma- tter in Ijrael-vras ftartled and flood at a maze at our Saviours Doftrine about it, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the fecond time into his mou- thers womb and be born ? faith he, Joh. 3.4. Such car- nal and grofs expoftulations could never have dropt from him if he had had a true fenfe of Original fin, but for want of that Regeneration was a ftrange and unintelligible myftery to him. The Pagan Philofo* phers had fome glimmerings of Original fin 5 hence they complained that the foul had loft her wings, and crept upon thefe lower things 5 that it was in the body as a prifbn, and there lookt out at the grates of fenfe ; of Original Sin. 20$ w fenfe, that it was fallen from the happy Region, and Chap. 9. inclined to evil. But, becaufe thefe were but glim- t^~v-^ merings, they did not fo much as dream of Grace or Regeneration 5 becaufe they did not fee the depth and venom of our Original wound, they thought there was medic -amentum in latere, enough in the Power and Free-will of the foul to heal it (elf: they reckoned all virtues to be among the ?* V«V^, the things in our power 5 and accounted the will to be fuch a miftrefs of it felf, that it might make it (elf good and excellent at its pleafurc. By all thefe in- fiances we fee plainly, that the Doctrine of Original fin is very ufeful and momentous. Original finis fet forth by many names in Scripture. It is called Sin, The finning fin, The fin that dwelleth in us, The fin that doth eafily befet us, The Law of fin and death, The Law in the Members, The flefh and the old man, The root of bitternefs, The plague of the heart : in the Fathers it is called the paternal poyfbn, The firft radical fin, The venom and ftroke of the old ferpent, The contagion of the ancient death, The weight of the ancient crime, The inju- ry of our Original. And St. Aufiin, that he might af- c^rtain that in which he oppofed the Pelagians, called* Non peccat it Original fin, from whence that name was after- lfte qui nafci " wards frequent in the Church : it was fb called, part- cat' \n* q P u T" ly becaufe we have it in our Original, it is interwo- genuic , non ven with our nature, and may fay to every one of ^condidk, us, As foon as thou wert, I am^ partly becaufe it is perquasrima* derived to us from Adam, the head and Original of jgj£ £nc££ mankind. * Hence when Julian the Pelagian arguec ccat .m thus againft Original fin : He fins not who is born: ' "^ he fins not who begets: he fins not who creates. By Nupn it 29? * what 7o6 Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. Quid quserit larencem ri- mam,cum ha beat apertifli- mam januam Per unum ho minem , ait Apoitolus , quid quaerit amplius ! I2.QucP. 8 Arc. 1. what chinks or cranies among fo many guards of innocence, do you feign that fin did enter ? St. Auftin anfvvers him thus : Why doth he feek a chink or a crany, when he hath an open gate ? By one man, faith the Apoftle, what would he have more ? It is that one man Adam, the original of mankind, by whom fin entred into the world 5 it is by him that it is derived to us. That one Text, touching the one man, is enough to break and fweep away all the fub- tile cobwebs which the Pelagians and Socwians have fpun out of their Wit and carnal Reafon to oppofe the Doftrine of Original fin. Original fin confifts in two things : 1. In that Adams firft fin is imputative! y ours. 2. In that we have an inordination and inherent pravity derived upon us from him. The firft thing is, Adams firft fin imputatively ours: not that God reputes us to have done it in our own perfon 5 not that it is imputed to us in the full latitude, as it was to Adam. We finned not as the head and root of mankind, we murdered not the whole humane nature 5 we did not ufher in fin and death upon the world: no, as the Apoftle faith, this was jV trfc, by one Adam 3 but as (bon as any man becomes poles Ad£ in conjunction with him, it is imputed to him, pro menfitra membri, in fuch fort and proportion as is competent to him, being a part and :• piece as it were of Adam. Aquinas illuftrates this by a notable inftance : Murder as a fin is not imputable to the hand in it fcl£ as diftincl: or feparate from the body 5 but as it is a Member in man, and moved by his Will : in like manner the fin of Adam is imputed to us, not (b properly as we are in our felves, but as we Of Original Sin. 207 we are parts and pieces of him, and derived our na- Chap. 9. ture from him. Adams fin was paft before we were ^7?*^^ born. It is therefore, as Bellarminc well expreffes it, mon j ca tur eo communicated to us in that manner, as a thing paft modo, quo can be communicated , namely by imputation 5 we ^1 "a quod did not perfonally commit it. It is therefore impu- tranfik, mini- ted to us in that meafiire, as is fit and juft for it to rum ^ m ' be imputed to thofe who are parts and members of De Amif.Graf, Ada,'}!. In that capacity it is conftru&ivcly and in- l * c l r tcrpretativcly ours, and accordingly God juftly rec- kons and imputes it unto us. That this is fo^ I (hall offer fome Confiderations 5 t. That of the Apoftle is very pregnant 5 by one man fin entred into the ivorld, and death by (in , and fo death pa [fed upon all men, for that all haze finned \ Rom. 5.12. In the Original it is, \$ $ whtu Jf*ap7«^ in him, that is, mAdam all have finned. Thofe words if $ are Relative. Three things, as St. Auflin ob-Cont.2. Epift. ferves, are fet down in this verfe before 5 Adam, Sin, Fel ' 1, 4 * c,/ **" and Death : thole words relate not to fin, for Sin in the Greek is a Feminine 5 nor to death, for men do not fin in death, but dye in fin 5 therefore they relate to Adam, in him all have finned. It's true, others take the words, ty f caufally, for that all have finned. But I think that, as I (aid before, they are to be ta- ken Relatively, in him all have finned. Thus thofe three thing?, which the Apoftle conjoyned together in this verfe, that is, the propagation of fin, the original of death, and the foundation of both, very well cohere together in this manner. The firft we have in thofe words, By one man jin entred into the rvorld. The fecond in thofe, Death paffed upon all. The third in thofe, In him all have finned. Thus thofe 2o8 Of Original Sin. Chap, g thofe phrafcs, fin entred, death pajjed, have a plain <~^v^-s explication. Sin did not ftay in Adam, but it entred into the world: But if Adi?ns fin be not imputative- ly ours, how did it enter ? It entred by Imitation, lay the Pelagians : but how vain is this ? Sin en- tred upon all, upon whom death paffed , and death pafled upon all without exception. But neither in- fants, who fin not actually, or after the fimilitudeof Adams tranfgrefiion 5 nor thofe adult perfons, who fin actually, but never fo much as heard of Adams (in, could have fin from Adam by Imitation. We are all finners, and children of wrath, not by Imita- tion , but by nature 5 Adams fin was rot meerly his own, but ours by Imitation. Thus fin entred into the world, and as a penal fruit of it , death pafled upon all 5 it did not ftay at Adam, but pafled upon all : and if Adams fin became not ours, how fhould that be ? The Apoftle doth not barely fet down fin and death, but fets them down in their order and connexion. Firft fin entred, and then death pafled, and that not as a meer infelicity or mifery, but as a juft punifhment for fin. Hence it is obfervable, that the Text faith, That death came by fin, and fo paffed 7/pon all. The Particles ( by and fo ) (hew that death paffed upon all as a punilhment. If Adams fin were not all mens, how could death pafs upon in- fants, who have no aftual fin ? God is not, cannot be unjuft 5 where there is no fault, there is no room for punifnment;, if infants in no fenie tranfgrefled the Command in Adam, the death in the threatning can- Delncar.f.i4.nc>t fall upon them, §lua jitftitia parvulus ftbjicitur peccati fipendio, ft nulla eft in eo peccati pollutio £ faith Fvlgentius- 'With what juftice can an infaat be fubjecl: Of Original Sin. 20 9 fubjed to the v/ages of fin, if the pollution of it be Chap, not in him ? May there be p&na fine can fa, a punifh- ment without a why or a wherefore ? It cannot be. If therefore, even Infants in Adam died, as the Apoftle fpeaks, 1 Cor. 15. 22, then in Adam all finned, as he tells us in the frequented Text. That this is the ge- nuine meaning of it 5 doth not only appear by the Text it (elf, but by that which followeth : By one mans difobedience many were conjiititted finners, v. 19. No unimputed fin can do this. If therefore Adams fin conftitute us finners, it is imputed to us. To fay, as the Socinians and fome others do, to conftitute us finners, is only to make us obnoxious to death, and fo to be treated as finners, is a thing vain and repug- nant to the Text. To be treated as a finner, is not to be conftituted fuch.To be treated as a finner, when a man is not fiich, is very unjuft and unequal. To be a finner, is to be culpable or guilty of a fault , and the proper fignification muft be retained. The Apoftle in this Chapter evidently diftinguifhes be- tween fin and death, tranfgreflion and condemnati- on, and makes Adam the origine of both, firft offing and then, by fin, of death : Therefore Adam firft makes us finners, and then obnoxious to death. Thus the words being taken relatively, In him all have fin- ned , the conclufion is plain, That Adams fin is im- . puted to lis. Nay, if the words be taken caufally, for that all have finned, the conclufion is the very fame 5 If death faffed upon all men, becaufe all have fumed , then Infants, becaufe death paffes upon them, have tinned: And how have they finned? Not in their own perfons, they are not capable of finning aftually 5 but in Adam, the root of mankind : Not Ee by 2 1 o Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. by an Imitation, they are not capable of fuch a things but by a participation of the firft fin, which by a juft Imputation becomes theirs. 2, The capacity which Adam was in, is very confi- derable. He was not confidered as a meer individual perfon, but as the Principle and Origine of Human nature. The admirable endowments of righteouf- nefs and immortality, were trufted and deposited in his hands, not meerly for himfelf, but for his pofte- rity. The command was not given to him as to a An- gular perfon, but as the Root and Head of Man- kind. The Covenant made with him, run thus : If he did ( as he was able ) obey the command, he fhould transfer innocency and life to his pofterity. If not, he (hould transfer fin and death to it. We were in him naturally, as latent in his loins 5 and legally, as comprized within the Covenant. This is very clear, becaufe the death in the threatning annexed to the command given to him, falls upon his pofterity. Had not the command extended to his children, the threat- ning could not have reached them. Had not they fin- ned in Adam their Head and Root, death could not have fain upon them in fuch fort as it doth 5 that is, in a ftate of infancy, void of any aftual fin of its own. This being the true ftate of things, it is no wonder at all that Adams fin (hould be imputed to us as parts and pieces of him. Adam was here confi- dered as the Root and Origine of mankind : his Per- fon was the fountain of ours 5 his Will the reprefon- tative of ours. Om??cs ?ws unm ilk Adam 5 We were one with him,and branches of him. Hence we finned in his fin, and putrificd in him as in the root. Thefo things, if weighed, give an cafie folution to all the cavils Of Original Sin. 2 1 1 cavils and obje&ions which the Pelagians and their Chap. 9. followers make againft the imputation of Adorns fin to us. Firft, They fay , Dcus, qui propria peccata re- mitt it, 7w?7 imputat aliena : God, who forgives us our own firs, doth not impute to us another mans. But here is a great miftake, as if Adams fin were juft nothing at all to us. Adam was the Root, and bore all mankind in himfelf^ we were leminally and le- gally in him : His fin therefore was not alien altoge- ther to us, but in a fort our own. We finned in him as our Head: We fell with him as the branches fall with the body of the Tree. St. Austin laith, contr. 7. .,1.5: Though Adams fin were alien proprietate aliionfc^ yet cap. 4. it was ours co77tagione prop agi 77k. Gregory Nazi arizen (peaking of J^/#// fin, cryes out pathetically, Oinfirmi- tatem meatn I O my infirmity ! St. Bernard notably ex- Serm< , DoDL prefTes it^Cu/paaltcna eji^quia in Adam omnes nejeierttes i.Poft. 8. £- peccavimus, noftra, quia ctji in alio nos tamen peecavimus, M h * & nobis jufio Dcijudicio i mputab at ur, licet occult 0: Adams (in was alien to us, becaufe we ignorantly finned in him} yet it was ours, becaufe we finned, though in another^ and it was to us imputed by the juft, though fecret counfel of God. Again they fay, That which is proper- ly fin in us, is voluntary, and an aft of our will 5 but Adams was not fuch. I anfwer : The foundation of this Objeftion, That all proper fin is voluntary, or an aft of our will, is not univerfally true: Vain thoughts )Mp^X **- are fin, and fuch as are the objedft of a good mans wdt hatred, much more of the hatred of the Holy One } yet they are no afts of our will. The firft rifings and ftirrings of luft, which antecede confent, are fins, and yet no afts of our will. The mutinies and rebellions of the lower faculties againft Reafon, are fins, and yet E e 2 no a ia Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. no afts of our will. But might this rule hold in aftu- t*"-*v— w al fin, yet furely it cannot in original 5 for then there (hould be no fuch thing as original fin, though Scrip- tures, Fathers, Councils, affert it 5 though the Church have been poffefied of this truth in all ages ^ yet it is an error, there is really no fuch thing : For neither was Adams tranfgreflion the aft of our will , neither is the inherent pravity in us fuch. If then we con- fefs original fin, we muft acknowledg that the rule ex- tends not to it. Thus when Julian objefts , That there is no fin in Infants, becaufe they have not the exercife of free-will} St. Auftin diftinguifhes thus: Comr. Jul. Hoc reUe dicitur propter proprium cujufcfr peccatum^ non lib. 3, cap. $* propter primi peccati originate contagtum 5 Whatever may belaid in aftualfin,it is not foinoriginal.Further, Adams fin as to us, may belaid to be voluntary, in two refpefts^ the one is this : It was voluntary jvoltwtate pri- mi parentis ,in the will of Adam the Head of Mankind, while he flood in his integrity. He was the moral Head of Mankind, and, as Bellarmine {peaks, Totius humam generk gejfit personam , he fiiftained the perfon of all mankind:, his will therefore wasinterpretatively ours$ our will was virtually in his. Murder is imputed to the hand, becaufe the will, though it be not there, is yet in that perfon of whom the hand is a part. In like manner Adams fin is imputed to us, becaufe the will, though it was not perfbnally in us, was yet in him, of whom We are parts and members. Thus that De PcccatOr. learned Profeffor Dr. Ward , Ex voluntate primi pa- *° 7f rentk^ ex quo tota pojleritas derivator^ peccatum illud in pofierk^ velut in membris Ad#, voluntarium ejje cen- fetur 5 The will of the firft Parent, from whom all the pofterity is derived, renders his fin voluntary in all Of Original Sin. a 13 all men, as being members of him. The other refpeft Chap. 9, is this, it is voluntary in us, in our own perfbns ha- bitually , there is in us an evil frame and difpofition to fin and tranfgrefs as Adam did 5 the aft was his, yet a feed of it is found in us. Further, they fay, It is againft juftice and equity, that Adams fin fhould be imputed to us 5 that we, innocent in our felves, fhould be guilty by a fin not our own. I anfwer, Adams capacity confidered, there is no injuftice in it 5 he was the head and root of mankind, he was the com- mon Truftee of righteoufnefs and immortality for all 5 the Covenant was made with him for himfelf and for his pofterity 5 his fin therefore was not meerly his, but ours 5 neither are we born innocent, but guilty : If it were againft juftice and equity to impute his fin to us, then it was againft juftice and equity to punifh us for it with death temporal, fpiritual, eternal: But the latter is falfe 3 fo therefore is the former. Death falls as a punifhment upon Infants void of aftual fin of their own : Thus the Apoftle lays it down clearly, Sin entered into the worlds and death by fin 5 andfo death pafjed upon all men^ Rom, 5. 12. Death was not a meer mifery or infelicity, but a juft puniftiment. Surely it confifts not with juftice and equity , that proper puniftiment fhould fall on perfbns altogether void of guilt 5 or that the threatning of death fhould feize upon thofe who no way tranfgrefled that com- mand to which it was annexed 5 therefore the impu- tation of Adams fin to us, is fo far from being againft juftice and equity, that without it, the equity and juftice of God in inflifting death as a puniftiment upon all men, cannot be reafonably cleared. I need add but one thing more, God dealt with Adam the head 214. Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. head of mankind, upon terms of abundant equity : \*^v—+J for as Adam finning, was to transfer fin and death to us 5 fo Adam obeying, was to transfer righteoufnefs and immortality to us : The terms were equal on both hands 5 we were in him as our head, as w r ell for the obtaining of bleffednefs upon his obedience, as for the incuning punifhment upon his difobedience. Thefe objeftions being removed out of the way, I conclude, That the capacity which Adam flood in at firft, is a clear evidence, that his fin is imputed to us. 5. If Adams fin be not imputed to us, then neither was his righteoufnefs fo } then we never were righ- teous, we never were efteemed fuch in Gods account } then we are not fallen creatures, we are meerly fim- ply as God made us : Then what need of renovation or regeneration? An unfallen creature is uncapable of reparation 5 Whence then, or by what way could it poflibly come to pafs, that there fhould be an in- nate inordination or pronenefs to evil in us? Such things cannot be found in an unfallen rational crea- ture, yet doubtlefs they are found in us. The Scrip- ture tells us, that we are naturally dark } nay, dark- nefs it felf: That the heart is deceitful above all things^ and defperatclj/ wicked. Nay, the very Philolbphers fpied out this. Hence Tully faith, That man was brought forth into life, not by nature as a Mother, but as a Step-mother } with a body naked, frail, in- firm, with a mind anxious in troubles, low in fears, foft in labours, prone to lufts. Upon which St. An- Contr Jul ift^-^oiks thus, Naturam accufavit, rem vidit^ cau- 4. cap. 12. fim nefcyyU^ Utebat eum cur ejjet grave jugum fuper fi- lios Adam. He accufed nature, the thing he faw, the caufe Of Original Sin. 2 « 5 caufe he knew not, the grievous yoke on the fbns of Chap. 9. Adam was hid from him. Nav, the very Socimans^ i*^>s—*j though in the point of Original (in they are more blind and void of fenfe than Pagans, confcfs thus much, Ho- mines ad peccandum fiwt natnri provi : Men are by Wfe ad cap. 28. contemptum Dei^ a love of himfelf, even to the con- tempt of God. The Affections are all vain, earthly, carnaL Of Original Sin. carnal, mutinous again ft reafon:, infomuch, that they Chap. 9. by anunnatural violence depofe it, and fo unman the man : Hence he becomes as the beafts that peri (hi. The Reafon filth, this or that is good 5 but the Af- feftions repugn and refift. The Soul is paralytick, Reafon moves to the right hand, Affection to th? lefc, and carries all before it: Hence that faying, Vi- deo meliora proboq-? , deteriora jequor. The Affe&ions, which primitively were fervants to Reafon, arc now upon the Throne. Reafon, though once a Royal Prince, is dethroned and become fervilc. That which is the glory of our nature, and proves us to be men , that is hurried up and down by the rude rabble of lufts and malapert paflions. This being the natural frame and temper of man, let us fit down and con- fider 5 Was it thus from the beginning? Was humane nature fuch in the firft impreflion ? Did God put his Reafon under a Cloud, or his Will into chains and fervitude? Was it from God, that the one turns away from the firft truth, and the other from the chief good ? Did God put into man an inftinft after hap- pinefs in vain, or infpire into him an immortal fpirit, that it might creep upon the earth, and pour out it felf to every vanity? Did God create man at vari- ance with himfelf, and at firft, fet up that unnatural inteftine war, which is between the rational and fen- fitive powers ? Was it his pleafure, that the inferior faculties in man fhould contumacioully reluct againft the fuperior 5 or that the fuperior (hould bafely fcrvc the inferior ? Without doubt it cannot be. God is light, purity, Wifdom it felf 5 thefe things are dark- nefs, corruption, ataxy, and cannot be from him. No other account can be given of them but this 5 *' That 232 Of Original Sin. Chap, 9. That they arc the bruiils of the fall, the wounds of corrupt nature. 3, No man , who looks abroad into the World, can with any colour oppofe this truth. The millions of aftual fins, which as a mighty deluge overfpread the world, are as fo many pregnant proofes of that original pravity which is in us. In the old world all flefh had corrupted its way, Gen. 6. 1 2. Afterwards, all nations walked in their own ways, AcJs 14. 16. That is, in finful ones : fin is the courfe of the world, Ephefi 2. 2. It is the element and proper ubi of it} the whole world lies in it, 1 J oh. 5. 19. And whence is it, that finis founiverfal, that iniquity abounds in all times and places? Our Saviour opens the bloody fountain of it, Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts,* murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, falfe-witnefs, blafiphemies, Matt. 15. 19. All thefe black troops of wickedneft, iffueout from the corrupt heart of man 5 the inherent pravity which is there, is feminally all the monfters of vice. The Apoftle Paul proving all under fin, doth thus delcribe the corrupt eftate of men 5 There is none righteous, no not one. There is none that underjlandeth, none that fieketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together be- come unprofitable, there is none that d?cth good, no not one. Their throat is an open fepulcher , with their tongues they have ufed deceit, the p 07 fin ofafps is under their lips : Whofie mouth is full of a/rfing and bitternefis : Their feet are fiwifit to filed blood : Dejlru&ion and mi- fiery are in then ways: The way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes, Rom. 3. Here the Apoftle paints out corrupt nature $ not that all men a&ually do thefe things, but that there is in every Of Original Sin, a 23 every one, even from their infancy, a wrvffpta an Chap. 9. univerfal feminary of iniquity, a venemons root of ' all aftual fins. In this refpeft, the defcription apper- tains to all, even to little infants 5 and the fcope of the Text requires, that it fhould be fo interpreted: for before this defcription, the Apoftle tells us, that all are under fin, verf 9 5 and after it, that every mouth is flopped, that all the world is guilty before God § that by the deeds of the law, no flcfl flail be jujlified in his fights verf 19, 20: and afterwards, that all have fumed, and come flort of the glory of God, verf 25. If the defcription did not reach all men, his conclu- fions drawn from thence would not hold, the de- fcription might extend to fome, yet others, at leaft little Infants, might not befinners or guilty 3 and con- sequently might be juftified by the Law, as having nothing againft them. The Apoftle therefore here, by the aftual fins of fome, proves original fin in all 5 and upon that account proves all to be guilty, under fin, and unjuftifiable by the Law \ becaufe all have that inherent pravity, which is the root of aftual fins. St. James tells us, That every man k tempted, when he is drawn away of his own luft and enticed, Jam. I. 14. Luft or original concupifcence, is the great tempter 5 it doth not only entice as an objeft, but by a kind of impetus and importunity, it draws us away from God the infinite goodnefi, to one creature-vanity or other 3 by its motions and titillations it wooes for a content, and afterwards it brings forth the outward, aft of fin. The world tempts outwardly, but this is domefticus hojiis, a traitor within in our own bofom 5 it tempts not objeftively only, but effectively, really inclining us to fin : it is a perpetual tempter, Refiji the Devil and 224 Of Original Sin, Chap. 9. and he will fly from you, Jam. 4. 7, but make never lb great a refiftence againft this luft, it will not in this life fly from you, neither can you fly from it. This is that which conceives and brings forth all theaftual fins in the world : Nay, it is that which diftils finful- ne'fi into the beft aclions of Saints 5 all the crying a- bominations in the world, and all the defects in the Church are the progeny of it. This is the root of all bitternefij the fomes peccati, the neft and womb of all actual fins. It may be thought perhaps that all this difcourfe is befides the intended (cope, original fin was not exem- plified in Chrift : But I anfwer, It was not indeed ex- emplified in him, but the Doclrine of it may be un- deniably drawn from him. To this end I lhall offer thefe particulars. 1. The conception of Chrift is very confiderable. He was conceived in the Virgins womb, not in the ordinary way of nature } not by the conjunction of man and woman, but in a Divine and extraordinary manner ; in a way above all the power and law of nature. Hence the Angel tells the Virgin Mary, The Holy Ghojl JJndl come upon thee, and the power of the higheft Jhaltoverfhadow thee, Luk. 1. 35 = Hence it is (aid, that fix was found with child of the Holy GLcjl^ Matt. 1. 18. That is, the body of Chrift was form- ed by the infinite power and virtue, though not out of the fubftance of the Holy Spirit. The fubftance of Chrifts fiefh was taken out of the Virgin, and like unto ours } but the Itrufture and manner of framing of it, was infinitely furmounting that of ours. Hence his flefh is faid, to ie a tabernacle net made with hands, net of tkk lutlding^ Heh. o. 1 1. It was not (ct up in the Of Original Sin. 2 2 c the natural way of generation, but in a miraculous Chap. 9. fupernatural manner 5 and why was it thus, but that c^-\^w his humane nature might, as St. Luke ipeaks, be an holy thing, pure from the lcait tin&urc of fin ? All men, who come from Adam in a natural wav, con- tract guilt and pravity in their original, but his flefli was formed out of the fubftance of a Virgin in a mi- raculous and extraordinary manner, that fo hc,though like to us in all things, might not be like to us in (1115 that he might partake of our fleftiand blood in a pure and unfpotted way: here we (ec,purity was his prero- gative, the common lot of our nature is corruption. It's true, the Pelagians are not afraid to affert, That Chrift was free from all contagion of fin} AW ex- Auft. adBo*, cellentia propria & gratia fingulari, fed communion* na- "' 4* c « 2 v turd\ q/Lf omnibus in eft infantibus 5 Not by any pro- per excellency and lingular grace:, but by a commu- nion of that nature which is in all Infants. But this is in efteft to fay, that the coming of the Holy Ghoft upon the Virgin, the overfhadowing her by the pow- er of the Higheft, were fuperfluous and vain 5 all might have been as well in an ordinary way: this is to rob Chrift: of his prerogative, to bring down the Saviour to the common level of the (aved, which can never indeed come to pals. There is a great differ- ence between Chrift: and us in this point 5 our bodies are formed in the ordinary courfe of nature , but his was formed in an extraordinary fupernatural way. We were in Adam, fecundnm rationem feminalem'-, We defcended from the feminal vertue in him. But he was in Adam only featndum fiibflantiam corporalem^He took the materials of a body from the Virgin 5 but the modus conceptions^ the manner of framing of it, G g was 226 Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. was fupernatural. We come forth into the world by *****— +J that common benediftion, Increafe and multiply^ but he came into the flefh by that lingular promifc, The feed of the woman pal/ breal^ the Serpents head. We lee here a plain difference. Hence it appears, that purity was a lingular priviledg in Chrifts birth} and pollution is the common lot of ours. 2. The capacity Chrift ftood in is to be noted. He was fet up to be a common head of righteoufnels and life 5 and that tells us, that before him there was a- nother, who by his fall was a common head of fin and death. Famous is that place, Rom. 5, If by one mans offence death reigned by one 5 much more they which receive abundance of grace, and of the gift of right eon f nefs, fhall reign in life by one Jefus Chrift. As by the offence of one, judgment came upon all men to condem- nation } fo by the righteoufnefs of one, the free gift came upon all men to jujlifcation of life. As by one mans difobedience many were made finners 5 fo by the obedi- ence of one, fhall many be made righteous. We lee here two heads, Adam and Chrift, both are fet before us, the one cannot be well known without the other; the Pagans know neither, Chriftians muftconfefsboth. If they lay, Chrift is an head communicating righte- oufnels and immortality to us 5 they muft alfo lay, Adam was an head communicating fin and death to us 5 elfe the Apoftles Parallel is vain and frivolous, in that Chrift, who obeyed in a publick capacity, is oppoled to Adam, who finned only in a private one* Both thele heads muft be admitted, or neither 5 if both, then there is fin from Adam, as well as righte- Epift. i$*l oulhels from Chrift. Thus St. Bernard faith, Alius qui peccatorem conftituit^ alius qui jujiiffcat a peccato, alter * , Of Original Sin. 22y alter in femine, alter in fatiguing One Adam makes us Chap. 9. finners, another makes us righteous 5 the one by his <^~v-*w feed, the other by his blood : if neither, then the obedience of Chrift is made fruitlcfs and to no pur- pose. Hence St. Aujbn faith, That the Do&rinc of De Nat. & Original fin mud be defended ngainft the Pelagians, ^ rat * Ct6t Ne evaaictur crux Chrifli, left the Crofs of Chrift be made of no effect: According to the tenour of that place, one head cannot ftand without the other. If Adam derive not fin to us, neither dothChrift derive righteoufnefs => both muft be only patterns 5 neither, communicative heads 5 which to fay, is utterly to overturn the lcope of the place. 3. Oar Saviour Chrift inftituted Baptifm,andthat for Infants} but if there be no Original pollution in them, What need a waftiing-ordinance for them? The wafh- ing of their bodies, whofe pure, innocent, undefiled Souls are uncapable of fpi ritual walhing, is but a (hadow without fubftance, a Sacrament without in- ternal grace, a thing too infignificant for Chrift the Wifdom of God to inftitute. Hence when the Pela- gians on the one hand granted the Baptifm of In- fants, and on the other denied Original fin 5 St. An- Com. Jul. 1. ftin faith, that they fpoke wonderful things. In Sa-S c '3- cramento Salvatoris baptizantur, fed non falvantur, re- dimuntur fed non liber ant ur, lavantur fed non abluun- tur^ In our Saviours Sacrament Infants are baptized, but not faved} redeemed, but not delivered 5 wattl- ed, but not clcanfed. And a little after he asks, If they are faved, what was their ficknefs? If delivered, what their fervitude ? If clcanfed, what their pollution? Take away the Doctrine of Original fin, and the Baptifm of Infants fcems to be a very ridiculous G g 2 thing. 228 Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. thing. To avoid this abfurdity, the Pelagians a£ i^— n/^-o ferted, That the Baptiftn of Infants was neceffary, ^«/?.dePecc. nQt b ecau f e there was any Original fin in them 5 but. ,ig. .2. .7. ^ at ^ e y m jgj lt j je ca p a ]3i e f t j ie Kingdom of Hea- ven. But I atrfwer, Where there is no defect, there is all due perfection. If Infants are pure and free from all fin, then have they all the righteoufhefs and rectitude which ought to be in them 5 and if they have fb,they are, without Baptifm,capable of Heaven, or if they were not, the baptifmal-wafhing, which imports pollution, feems to be a ceremony very unfit and incongruous to be applied to them who are with- out fpot, or to render them apt for Heaven. 4. In and about the death of Chrift, two things are confiderable 5 The one is the horrible wickedness of the Jews in crucifying him: The other is,The infi- nite merit which is in his death and (acrifice. Both will manifeft the Doctrine of Original fin, Firft, The horrible wickednefs of the Jews in cru- cifying him will do it. The rottennefs of the root (hews it felf in the branches 5 the malignity of Ori- ginal fin appears in actual ones , efpecially in thole which are of a deeper ftain than others are. It was the aggravation of Solomons fin, that his heart was turned from the Lord, who had appeared to him twice, 1 King. 11. 9. The more eminently God ap- pears to us, the more aggravated are our actual fins againft him 5 and the more aggravated thofe are, the more vile and vencmous doth the inward root of them appear to be. When God appears to us in Rea- fon, which is a beam from him more precious than a world , it fpeaks defperate corruption in men, that the brutal part (hould ufurp and rule over it 3 that the Of Original Sin. 229 the vile fenfual lulls (lion Id tread down that Divine Chap. 9, fpark, and, as it were, annihilate it, that nothing of God might have place in the heart. When God further appeared in the Law and thcProphcts,to raife up a purer knowledg of himfelf than was to be found in Reafon, as^ it lay in the duft and rubbifh of the fill, it argues a greater pravity and malignity in men, that they fhould murder his Prophets, and trample his Sacred Laws, the images of his holy Will, under their impure feet 5 this was in crTeft, as much as in them lay, to explode God out of his own world, and practically to fay, that he fhould not reign there. When God yet more eminently appeared, when he fent fiis own Son, very God of God, to be manifeft in theflefh^ whofe glory broke forth moft illufirioufly in excellent Doctrines and Miracles 5 whofe whole life among men was nothing but innocency, purity, mercy, meeknefs, goodnefs, humility, love, zeal, hea- venlinefs, holinefs, obedience, and all manner of vir- tue, in (potlefi perfection } one might have thought that men would have reverenced the Son 5 that the in- dwelling-corruption, however it had rioted under o- ther mamfeftations, would here have made a pau(e,and flood as oneaftonicd and over-awed at fb ftupendious an appearance, infinitely tranfeending all other : For what is the little fpark of Reafon, to the brightnefs of Gods glory ? Or the Law in the letter, to incar- nate Sanftity and Holinefs ? Or what are all the Pro- phets to him who came out of the Fathers bofom, and brought down fupernatural Myftcriesinto the world? Here it might have been expected, that Iniquity Ihould have ftopt her mouth, and held her hands} that the Divine Majefty of this appearance (hould have made 2go Of Original Sin. Chap. 9. made Corruption to retire, and hide it felf in the fe- cret of the heart. But alas, the event was quite con- trary 5 Original Corruption here did its utmoft, and (hewed forth all its malignity 5 the wicked Jews cried out, This is the heh\ come let us kill him : They re- viled, raged, blafphemed, perfecuted, apprehended, accufed, condemned, buffeted, and at laft crucified the Lord ofGlory.Ohmatchlefs wickednefs! never did Ori- ginal fin fo fully difcover it (elf, never did the Hell in the Belial-heart fo defperately break forth as here. We fee here our Corruption in its true colours and malig- nity 5 it is the root and fountain of the higheft im- pieties 5 Antichrift-like, it oppofes all that is called God 5 it would have nothing of God remain 5 it would trample down every appearance of him, not in Reafon or Laws only, but in his own Son, in God incarnate 5 and, were it poilible, it would even cruci- fie and annihilate the Deity it felf: rather than part with its dear lufts, it would have God ceafe to be. The next thing considerable, is the infinite Merit in Chrifts death : it procured two things for us, Rege- neration and Salvation. Firft, It procured Regenera- tion for us : This is a mod precious thing , it new- frames and new-moulds us 5 it produces a new fpi- ritual being 3 it draws the Divine image and like- ne(s upon the heart} it fets the foul into an holy or- der and reftitude 5 and whence is it but from the Spi- rit ? Or how is that procured, but by Chrift and his fweet-fmelling Sacrifice? The Apoftle tells us , That the Holy Ghoft which renews us, is fljed on us abun- dantly through Jeftts Chrijl our Saviour^ Tit. 3, J, 6. Through him it is that the Holy Spirit comes do m and effefts this excellent work in us. Again, it pro- cured Of Original Sin. 231 cured Salvation for us. That we are (lived from our Chap. 9. (piritual encmics,that we are at laft crowned with life- <-*— v—*^ eternal, it is from Jefus Chrift alone. Hence the Apo- ftle calls him the author of eternal falv at ion, Heb.5.95 not theMinifter, but the Author of it, meritoriouily procuring, and efficacioully giving it to his people. But now if there be no fuch thing as Original fin, much of the precious purchafe of Chrift muft be loft} he purchafed Regeneration 3 but there being no Origi- nal fin, where or in whom will it be necelTary ? What, m Infants? In thole pure innocent fouls there is no- thing to be healed , nothing to be mended or new- made 5 where there is no ataxy of fin, there all is in order and harmony 5 where there is no turpitude of fin, there all is in f plendor and glory : here's no need at all of Regeneration. Hence, as St. Auftin obferves, Mjl.de Vec. the Pelagians denying Original fin, were under a ne- ° - 1 * *»c*$, ceflity to fay, That Infants did not indigere medico, want the Phyfician Jefus : and upon this that excel- lent Father pafles this cenfurc, That therein they er- red not in fome light matter, but in ipfi regit la fidei , in the very Rule of Faith by which we are Chrifti- ans. Or what, in the Adult ? I anfwer, They which are without Original fin, may live without Aftual : therefore the Pelagians, who denied Original fin, held, very confonantly to their Principles, That men might live without (in. Thus they argued: He that 7rr.Dial.adu. can abftain one day from fin, mayabftain two days, rd^.l.i.c.2. three days, thirty days, three hundred days, nay for ever. And again, Si neceftitatk eft, peccatnm non eft? ^ u Qfc per _ ft voluntatis eft, vitari pot eft : If the thing be of ne- feet. juft. ceffity, it is no fin 5 if of will , it may be avoided. Take away Original fin, their arguments muft hold good : Of Original Sin t good : Adam, while totally void of fin, might have kept himfelf (b : Why may not all others, if void of Original (in, do fo ? Having no inward corruption to intice or draw them away unto fin, they may live without it. Here again there is no need of Regene- ration. To go on a little further : Suppofe a man do fill into one act of fin 5 yet one aft of fin, if we Aufl.zdBon. believe the Pelagians and Socimans, cannot corrupt 1. 1. c 1. the human nature or Will 5 the man may rife again n/^de'ver! b ? hlS OWn Wlll > and a11 wiU be Wcil a g am ' As T et Rel.lj.c.18! there is no need of Regeneration. Nay, fuppofe a man to fill into an habit or cuftom of fin, in fome degree, yet why may not the Will, that noble Prin- ciple of freedom, extricate it felf ? The Corruption is not feated in nature, but in a contracted habit 5 why may not the Will, by contrary afts unravel that habit, and rid it felf of it ? And that habit or incli- nation being gone, what need would there be of Re- generation ? An outward Reformation may be ne- ceflary, but what need of Regeneration ? That in Scripture is the renovation of a man originally cor- rupted : Hence our Saviour prefling the neceffity of Regeneration, doth not urge it from the aftual fins of men, but from their natural pravity : That which is ban? of the flejfr, is fiejl), Joh. 3. 6 : that is, thofe who have only a carnal generation, and fo are origi- nally corrupt, are corrupt 5 therefore they (land in need of Pvegeneration, or the participation of a new fpiritual nature. But if there be no fuch thing as Original corruption, then according to our Saviour s argument, which pre Acs it from thence, there is no need at all of Regeneration. Accordingly it maybe obfetved, that thofe men who deny Original fin, do * extremely Of Origin^ Sin. 233 extremely fumble and (lubber over that great point Chap. 9. of Regeneration, for the moft part confounding in- <^-*\r-*o ward Principles with outward A&ions. Regenerari De Ver.Relig ad vit£ mores & alii ones referendum efl, faitri Volkgli- Jib. 4. cap. 4 . us: Regeneration is to be referred to the manner and actions of the life. Ex Ckrijio nafci nihil aliud eft &? Servant. quam ejus fpiritus participcmcffc, Chrifti autew fpiritu* P ars 4- ca P'*' voluntatis divintf obedientia eft, faith Socinus: To be born of Chrift, is nothing elfe but to be partakers of his Spirit 5 and his Spirit is obedience to the Divine Will. All is placed in outward aftions, nothing is faid of thofe internal Principles of Grace which are the proper effeft of Regeneration 5 and the Reafon of this is, becaufe denying Original fin, they know no other Regeneration,but outward Reformation on- ly. Much after the fame rate (peak fome other Di- vines, who, not in exprefs terms denying Original fin, do yet leflen and diminifh it 5 their difcourfes of Regeneration proportionable to their Principles, have but little favour or fpiritual relifh in them : upon the whole matter, we fee that there is little need of Re- generation. Again, Chrift purchafed Salvation, but there being no fuch thing as Original fin.Who fhallbe faved by him ? Shall infants be faved by him? Indeed, of fuch is the Kingdom of Heaven,but what are they faved from? Is it from fin? There is no fpot in them 5 Chrift came in the likenefs of finful flefh, they do no more 5 they have no real flefh of corruption in them. Is it from wrath ? There can be none due to finlefs creatures. Is it from Satan? He may come and find nothing in them, nothing belonging to his black King- dom. Is it from the world? They are not jret men- tally, morally entred into it, fo as as to be capable of H h 611- 2^4 Of Original Sin, Chap. 9 falling into the fhares of it} there is therefore no- v^^v^*^ thing at all for infants to be laved from. Hence the Fathers in the Council of Carthage do in their Epiftle *Noneftquod to Pope * hmocuit tell us, That according to the Pe- rn eisfalvetur, Ugums, there is nothing in Infants to be faved or re- tk> -*dimauir* deemed f, nothing vitiated or held under the power of nihil eft ineis the Devil «, neither was blood (lied for their remiffion. fib iat dSi hil Hence St - + M thl ar 8 ues thus > Hc that faith > that In " poteftate cap- fants have nothing to be faved from, denies Chrift to tivum,necpro ^ a j e jus to them. What is Jefus? Jefus is by inter- fanguis in re- pretation a Saviour, a Saviour is Jefus ; thole whom miflionem he doth not fave, becaufe they have nothing to be \TaKcomJow, f ave d from , he is not to them a Jefus. Thus we fee, iifo'470, that there being no Original fin, Infants (which what familem Ci ata* chriftian teart can bear?) are not faved by Chrift. tem non ha- Shall the adult be laved by him? As I noted before, bere quod fal- t ] ie y w ho are without Original fin, may live without nitofideiibus a&ual$ and fo, being void of all fin, are uncapableof infantibus being laved , becaufe they have no fin to be faved £VSfam. & on *' k was the °P inion o£*Cafi*w, That Chrift Jefus quid eft ? was, aliorum falvatoi\ ahorum fp/fceptoi\ the Saviour i nt f CrP falvator °^ k>»e-, ^ e Sufceptor of others $ the firft were falvator eft ie- drawn in by Grace, the fecond prevented Grace, fus •, quos non This made Projper fay, Hide fenientke is potejl pr ill deliver me from the bedy of this death ! Rom. 7. 24. How fadly fhould we look upon that forlorn fpe&acle, I mean our corrupt felves ! How fhould we lothe our felves, and lye low at Gods feet, if peradventure he may give us a better nature! Of what vaft concern is it to wait upon God in Ordi- nances, and by ardent devotions to prefs into Hea- ven, that there may be a new- creation in us ! 'And when that great work is wrought in us, How fhould we lift up free-grace, and fing Hofannas to it for ever ! How often fhould we have that in our mouths, What hath God wrought ! We marred the firilCrea- tion, and he hath fet up a fecond. We lay in theru- ines of the fall, and he came down thither to rear up' his own image in us again. Graces are now grow- ing there, where fin had its feat 5 the Holy Spirit how inhabits there, where Satan dwelt and reigned: And what an excellent change is this! Let us diftin- gwfh our felves according to the two Adams. What- ever is vitious or defective in us, relates to the fir ft Adam $ whatever, is gracious or perfeftive of our nature, relates tevthe lecond. Never can we be too humble under the fenfe of Original corruption which adheres to our nature. Never can w 7 e be too thank- ful for that fupernatnral grace which gave us a new- nature. Becaufe we have a Divine nature in us, we fhould 2%% Of Original Sin, Chap. 9. fhould live futably to it. Had we had but one fingle creation, we had been eternally bound to ferve.and glorifie God 5 but when he fets to his hand the fe- cond time , to create us again in Chrift Jefus unto good works, how fhould our lives anfwer thereunto! When in the horrible Earthquake at Antioch the Em- peror Trajanus was drawn out of the ruines, it was a very great obligation upon him to ferve and ho- nour God who fo fignally delivered him 5 how much greater obligation lyes upon us, who are drawn by an aft of grace out of the ruinesof the fall ? How fhould we live in a juft decorum to that Divine na- ture which we are made partakers of ! We fhould ftill be bringing forth the fruits of the Spirit, and (hewing forth the praifes of him who hath called us out of darknefs into his marvelous light. Again, be- caufe the reliques of corruption are ftill remaining even in the regenerate, we fhould ever be upon our fpiritual watch 5 we fhould fet guards within and without, that fin may not creep in by the ports of fenfe , nor rife up out of the deep of the heart. When a temptation approaches to us, we fhould fay as an holy man did, Auferte ignem , adhtic emm pa- leas habeo 3 Take away the fire, yet I have chaff with- in. If a Jonah fall into a pet againft God 5 if a Da- vid wallow in adultery and blood 5 if a Peter deny his Lord with a curfe, What may not we do ! The remnants of Original fin in uf, fhould make us keep a watch over our hearts, and ponder the path of our feet. Our fleih is an Eve, a Tempter within us} nay, a kind of Devil, as an Ancient fpeaks, Nemo [ibi de fno palpet, quifque fibi Satan eft. CHAP. 2 39 Chap. 10. CHAP. X. Touching Grace. The fountain of it Gods love. The flrcams fupcr natural gifts. The center Heaven. Its freenefs, in that all pcriffi not in the fall } Original (in meriting death, and Chriji being a free gift. Its freenefs in chafing a Church to God. EletJion not of all 5 no Legijlative all, but a (ingling out of fome to life in an infallible way, and nteerly of Grace. Its freenefs in the external and internal Call. The diflin- clion between the two Calls. The efficacy of Grace as to the Principles of Faith and other graces 5 with the manner of their produBion , as to aUual believing and willing 5 with the proofs of it, as to per fever ance in faith and holincfs. The Habits of Grace defetti- ble in themfelves, but not in their dependence. HAVING fpoken of Original Sin, I (hall next confider of Grace , which heals that deadly wound. Grace, in the primary notion of it, is the Love and Good-will of God towards finners 5 and in a fceondary fenfe, it is tho(e faving-gifts which are derived from that Love. Thefe are called Graces, be- caufe they lye in mans heart, as beams of that eter- nal Grace which is in Gods; and tend to that Glory in Heaven which is Grace confummate. Gocfe will goes foremoft, and works thofe Graces in mans, which make him meet for eternal happinefs. The fountain of Grace is the free-love of God 5 the ftreams of it are fupernatural gifts in men } the center of it is the glory of Heaven. Thefe things (hew us the true no- tion of Grace. 1. The 340 Of GRACE. Chap. 10. i. The Fountain of Grace is Gods free Love, «^— v-*w which moves it (elf, and gratuitoufly flows out in fpiritual bleffings $ thefc iilue out of love, and that is a motive to it felf. Emphatical is that of the Apo- ftle, If by grace, then it is no more of works 5 otker- vpjfe grace is no mere grace : but if it be of worJ\s then it .is no more grace 5 other wife wo\\ is no more worh^, Rom. II. 6. It is effential to Grace to be gratuitous 5 unlefs it be fo, it lores its nature. Upon this account Pelagius, that Enemy of Grace, but for his counterfeit Recantation, had had in the Palcflme Council a juft Anathema for that laying, Gratiam dari feenndum merit a, That Grace was given according to AuftMy?. I.3. merits or works. When the Pelagians (aid, §>uia ego prior vohi? 9 Dc;/s vohiit , Bccaule I firft willed, there- fore God willed 3 Saint Aufiin tells them, That they brought in Merit , that Grace was then no longer Grace : In ornni of ere fancio, faith he, prior eft volun- tas Dei, poflerior liberi arbitrii 5 In every holy work SI vel tantll- Gods will is firft in order, and then mans. Without lumbonia this order, Grace cannot be Grace, nor God God. Deo non eft, if he be not the Fountain of all good , if the leaft jam non om- j p t an( j ant icipate his will, he is not,asbe- nis bom effec- b ,. \ . . V „ 1 -ri 1- tor eft, eoq; comes him, the ongine or all good. Ihe rountain necDeus. Bu- of Grace muft therefore be in his Love. fer ' 2, The (beams of it are Supernatural Gifts. Tt's true, natural benefits are in fome fenfe grace $ but this is not the noted acception of the word in Scrip- ture. This acception was but Pallium Pclagiancrum^ the Pelagians cloak under which they hid their He- Jujl. Epift. reiie. Hence, when that queftion was asked. What W« that Grace was which Pelagians thought was given without any precedent merits ? Anfvvcr was made, That Of GRACE. 241 That it was the humane nature, in which we were Chap. 10 made 3 for before we were, we could not merit a be- ing. Thus they confounded Grace and Nature to- gether 5 but the gifts of Grace are above the fphcar of Nature, and altogether undue to it. Indeed in Innoccncy righteoufnefs was natural to man, not that it was a principle of Nature, or an emanation from thence^ but that it was neceffary and due to that Integrity, which God would fet up the human nature in. God would make man very good, and how that could be without righteoufnefs, I know not. Moral goodnefs, is that which is proper to a reafonable creature 5 neither can it be wanting, but there will be a maim in the creature. There was in man an Uni- on of rational powers, in which he had communion with Angels } and fenfitive, in which he had commu- nion with Beafts. This Union could not be made in a perfeft orderly manner, unlefs the fenfitive powers, being the more ignoble, were fubjefted to the ratio- nal, being the more excellent faculties } that fubjefti- on could not be without a righteoufnefs. This is the reftitude and harmony of humane nature : without it all the parts and powers of the Soul muft needs jangle into confufion. God would have man to ferve and obey him in a perfect manner 5 And how could this be without a principle of holy love? Which way fhould there be a&ual righteoufnefs without ori- ginal ? Without an internal re&itude, man could not love God, as he ought, amove atntcitia^ with a love of friendfhip, for his own fake} and without fuch a love, referring all to God and his glory, all mans afts, a frimo ad ultimum, muft needs be fin. God would fet before a man a moft glorious end, the hap- pinefs of the beatifical vifion: And how fhould marl I i ever 2 4 a Of GKAC E. Chap. 10. ever arrive at it without righteoufnefs? Or want that righteoufhefs which qualifies for it?Such a want would fet him below the moft contemptible creatures$noneof which aredeftituteof that furniture,which is requifite for the reaching of their ends.In all thefe refpe&s,righ- teoufnefs was natural, and in a fort due unto man in Tnnocency. But after mans fall and forfeiture of Origi- nal righteoufnefs,faving gifts are altogether fupernatu- ral$ not only as being above the power of nature, but as being totally undue to it. To the ftate of Inno- cency,righteoufnefs was in a fenfedue} but to theftate of Corruption, there was nothing due but wrath. 3. The center of it is the Glory of Heaven 5 Grace prepares a Kingdom for Believers. Hence God bids them, come and inherit the Kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the World, Matt.2 5.345 it prepares them for the Kingdom. Hence that of the Apoftle , Giving thanks to the father, who hath made m meet to he partakers of the inheritance of the faints in light, Col. 1. 12. The firfl: rife of Grace, is in the bofom of eternal love 5 the appearance of it in men, is in fupernatural gifts : the period and center of it, is in the Glory of Heaven. Two things in this point of Grace offer themfelves to our confideration^ the freenefs of Grace, and the Divine efficacy of it. Firft, The freenefs of Grace is to be confidered, and that in two or three particulars. 1. It is of Free-Grace, that all mankind doth not eternally perifh in the ruines of the fall: That there is a pombility of Salvation for any one Son of Adam. When the Angels finned but one fin, God turned them down into chains of darknefi for ever : Might he not in juftice have dealt fo with fallen men ? He was Of GRACE. 343 was not bound to repair the Angels, thofe golden Chap. 10. Veffels, once inmates of Heaven 5 and who can, who dares conceive fuch a thought, That he was bound to repair men who are but Images of clay, dwelling in the lower World? I know many differences are at figned, Man finned by fedu&ion, Devils by (elf-mo- tion 5 in the fall of Man, all the human nature fell 5 in the fall of Angels, all the Angelical nature fell not. The fin of Angels was more damnable than Mans, becaufe their nature was more fublime than his. Men are capable of repentance, but Devils not 5 becaufe whatever they once choofc, they do will immovably. But alas ! all thefe are but exfnz-Scriptural conjectures. Man, though tempted, was voluntary in the tran£ greffion^ all men were involved in the fall, but that's no apology for the fin : The fin of Man, if not fo high as that of Angels, was yet a damnable one. It is a vain dream, to fuppofe, that Almighty Grace could not have wrought a gracious change in Devils. That which differences us from them, is, as the Scrip- ture tells us, no other, than the meer Grace and Phi- lanthropy of God towards us } he might juftly have left us under that wrath, which our apoftacy defer* ved. Two things will make this evident. 1. Original fin, which reaches to all, is properly fin 5 and, being fuch, merits no le(s than eternal death. We all finned in Adams fin , by that one man, fin entred into the world : The difobedience of that one, conftituted all finners 5 which unlefi it had been imputatively theirs, it could never have done. The want of Original righteoufnefs is properly fin, becaufe it is the want of that which ought to be in us} it ought to be in us, becaufe the pure (piritual I i 2 Law 344 Of G R A C E. Chap. 10. Law calls for an holy frame of heart : it ought to be in us, or ehe we are not fallen creatures, but are as we ought to be: If it ought to be in us, then the want of it is properly fin. The Apoftle proving that all are finners, and (hort of the Glory of God , tells us, That there is none righteous, no not one 5 none that underflandeth, none that feeketh after God. They are all gone out of the rvay. They are together become un- profitable. There k no fear of God before their eyes, Rom. 3. Which words denote a want of that habi- tual righteoufnefs which ought to be in all, even in little Infants : That want is fin, elfe the Apoftle could not from thence conclude, That all, Infants not ex- cepted, have finned and come (hort of the glory of God. To want habitual righteoufnefs, which ought to be in us , is to be finners, and (hort of our origi- nal. That original concupifcence, which is in all, is properly fin } it is over and over called fin in Scrip- ture, it is the root and black fountain of all impiety, it is oppofite to the Law and Spirit of God, it impels to all fin, it fights againft all graces, and particularly againit that of love to God : where the creature is inordinately loved, there God is not loved with all the heart and Soul. Thefe things make it appear, That Original fin is properly fin 5 andiffo, it merits no left than death eternal. The Scripture abundant- ly teftificth this, The -wages of fin is deaths but the gift of God is eternal life, through Jefus Chrifi our Lord, Rom. 6. 23. In which we have a double An- tithesis, Wages is oppofed to Gift 5 and eternal Death to eternal Life. By one man fin entred into the world, and death by fin, Rom. 5. 12: Not mcer infelicity, but fin entred 5 not mecr temporal death, but eter- nal Of GRACE. 245 nal followed upon it. Hence the Apoftle tells us, Chap. 10. That there v/as Ktt^iln %4[kwuis*> judgment unto con- \»**—\r-*w demnation, and that upon all men, verf. 16, and 18. We are by nature children of wrath, even as ethers, Eph. 2. 3. He doth not fay, by praftife or cuftom; but by nature, we are Children of wrath, that is?, worthy of it. Nature, as corrupted, is here oppofed to Grace ^ which, as the Text after (peaks, faves us : wrath appertains to nature, falvation to grace. This one Text is as a ftroke of Lightning, to lay all men * hoc uno flat and proltrate before Cod : even little Infants, ^erbo, quafi being unclean in themfelves, cannot, if unregenc- h^mo^quamus rate, (land at Gods right hand, and enter into the quanmseft, holy Heavens ^ they mud therefore ftand at his left, ff^u^ 1 and go into darknefs. Hence St. A/Jim i tells the Pe- \ Finge Pit*. lagians, who denied Original fin, That they muft £ /j *' ,ocnm » forge out of their Shop of Hcrefy, a middle place perverfTdog- for fuch Infants , as are Aliens from the Grace of mafis tu ^ ubi Ohrift: If Infants are unrcgenerate, they cannot en- Si'^SS ter Heaven the place of blifs. If, as the Pelagians rcquiei&gio- fav, they are free from fin, they cannot go to Hell nx P oflride J e the place of milery. LerUum ignoramus, A third fine. Au&\ Hyp place I know not, nor can find any fuch in Scripture: **$• They are therefore fubjecl: to eternal death for their Original fin. The fum of this Argument we have in Anfelm, Si originate feccatum fit ahquod peccatnm, ne- Dc cone. cejje eji omnem in eo natum, in illo non dimijjo damna- vir S ca P* 2 ~» ri. If Original fin be fin, it is neceflfary, that every one born in it, fhould be condemned for it, unlefs it be pardoned 5 it being impoffible, that anyone fhould be laved, (b much as with one unremitted fin. If Original Cm be indeed fin, and do merit death eter- nal, then God may juftly inflict that death for it, * feeing 1^6 Of G R A C E. Chap. 10. feeing he cannot be unjuft in doing an aft of juftice, in inflicting that punifhment, which is due to fin. 2. As on Mans part there is a merit of eternal death 5 (6 on Gods, the million of Chrift to fave us was an aft of meer Grace. This is fet forth in Scrip- ture, God commended hk love towards us, in that while we were yet [inner s Chriji died for us, Rom. 5.8. In thk was manifefied the love of God towards us^ be- caufe he fait hk only begotten fin into the world, that we might live through him, I Joh. 4. 9. God fi loved the world, that he gave hk only begotten fen, that who- fcever believeth in him, flwuld not perif/j, but have ever- lajiing life, Joh. 3. 1 6. We fee here, the fending of a Saviour was an aft of nicer Grace 5 and Grace, be- ing fiirely free and fel£ moving, might have fufpended its own aft } and that fulpenfion, had it been, would have left all men in the mines of the fall, and that without any colour of injuftice at all in God. There is a vaft difference between mercy in Man, and mer- cy in God 3 Man fhews it ex officio, out of duty, and in every failure he is unmerciful: but God fhews it, ex arbitrio, out of Sovereignty, in fuch fort as he pleafes 5 and to do more he is not obliged. Hence Gods Purpofe and Grace are joined together, 2 Tim. 1. 9. His Mercy, though an infinite Ocean, lets not out a drop towards fallen creatures, but according to his good pleafure: If God antecedently to his own decree and promife, was bound to fend his Son to (eek and to fave that which was loft 5 then the fend- ing of him, was not an aft of grace, but of juftice and neceflity : it muft 3 it ought to be fo 5 the Grace and Love revealed in the Gofpel, is a meer nullity, a thing no way free or gratuitous : but if, as the truth is, Of GRACE. a 47 is, God were not bound to fend a Saviour, then he Chap, ic might have fufpended his own aft, and left all man- wx— v^%-> kind in the ruins of the fall. - No man who believes thele two things, viz. That Original fin is fin, and merits wrath 5 That the Mif- fion of a Saviour is Grace and felf-moving:, can pof- fiby have hard thoughts of Gods Decree in the point of Reprobation. We being by Original fin in a ftate of wrath, what might not God do with us? Might he not juitly leave us in the corrupt Mafs? Or might he not juftly punifti us there ? If not leave us, then, as he would be juft, he was bound to give a Savi- our, and by confequence the giving of him fwhich is horrendum dogma') is no more Grace or Mercy, but Neceflity: If not punifh us, then as he would be- juft, he was bound not to do an aft of Juftice$ I mean, not to inflift that death which is as due wages to every fin. To me it is clear, That God cannot be cruel or unjuft,either in denying a Redemption purely gratuitous, or in inflifting a death juftly due to a fin- ful creature. St. Aujiin brings in the Pelagians mur- Epirt, 105, muring thus : Injuftum eft in una eademq^ mala caufa^ hunc hberari, ilium puniri. And then anfwers, Nempe ergo juftum eft utrumq^ puniri^ quk hoc negaverit ! If Original fin be fin, and Grace Grace 3 if God may be juft in punifhing, or free in giving, then he might without any colour of injuftice, have condemned all men 5 and if fo, he might have reprobated all men, and then no (cruple can be made touching the repro- bating of fbme. Theodore Ccruhert^ who in his life j ntcgrum Dco wrote againft Calvin and Beza touching Predeftina- eft, fervare tion, at his death confeffed, That God might do his vcI, « an re : pleafure in faving or condemning him -, there was no etfe\uod m reafbq, queracur, con- 44 s Of G RA CE. Chap. 10. rcafon of complaint either way. It is very obferva- ble, that thofe who deny Reprobation, do either in whole or in part deny Original fin , faying that it is no fin, or, which is all one, improperly fuch 5 orelfe they have no true notion of Grace in the freenefsand felf-motion of it. And to do either, what is it ? To deny Original fin, is to contradift the Letter of Scrip- ture, the judgment of the Church 5 nay, and the ex- perience of all men who will but refleft upon them- felves. To deny Grace to be free and felf-moving, is to fay Grace is not Grace, and to evacuate the Go- fpel, and to take away the glory of it. Neither of them may be done by any who calls himfelf Chrifti- an. The true notion of Sin is, That it is fuch a vio- lation of the Law, as merits death eternal. The true notion of Grace is , That it operates freely and of felf-motion. God, though under no neceffity, though he might have left fain men as well as fain Angels, under fin and wrath, was yet pleafed out of his meer good pleafure to give a Saviour unto men, and to o- pen a dore to them of falvation. This is free-Grace indeed, and for ever to be adored. Thus much touching the firft thing. 2. It is of free-Grace that God chufes a Church and people to himfelf 5 that he defigns fome certain individual perfons to the infallible attainment of Grace and Glory. And here I fhall confider two things 5 firft, That there is fuch an Ele&ion. And then, That it ifiues out of meer Grace. 1. There is fiich an Ele&ion of men unto Grace and Glory. Thus the Apoitle , He hath chojhi us in him before the foundation of the world, Eph. 1.4. He predestinated us to the adoption of children by Jcfus Ckrfa Of GR AC E. "" £49 Chr/Jl, ver.5. ^ n r he clearing of this I (hall lay down Chap. 10 feveral things. i^-nt"*^ 7. Election is not of all, but fome. It's true, Hu- bcrus afferted an univerfal elettion of all men : But this is dire&ly oppofite to Scripture. Few, not allure chofen, Mat. 22. 14. The elett are oppofod to the blinded ones, Rom. 11.75 a clear diftin&ion is made between veflels of honour and difhonour, between veflels of mercy and wrath, between thofe that are written in the book of Life, and thofe that are left out of it. Eleftion is called Uhoyh* it feparates and fingles out fome to mercy in a way of choice. Were ~-^ it of all, it could not be Eleftion, there could be no- thing of choice in it. The Eleft are (aid to be cho- fen out of the world, Job. 15. 19 : but all are not chofen out of all, that's impoffible. Eleftion there- fore is of fome individual perfons only : The Lord knowcth thofe that are his, 2 Tim. 2. 19. Their names are all down in the book of life. Phi 4. 3, *tq<, this individual perfon, this very Paul, who but now was breathing out blood againft the Church, this is a vet lei of eleftion, Acts 9.1 5, faith God to Ananias. The eleftare called a remnant, Rom. 11. 5, becaufe it is made up of fome individual perfons fpecially fingled c\ cw^^;, out of the corrupt mafs unto God. The will of Gods ^ ee c^JUi Complacence refpe&s Graces without a diftin&ion of °^ c perfons 5 Every one that fears God, is accepted, Afts 10. 35. A good man draws out favour from the Lord^ Prov. 1 2. 2. But the will of Gods Benevolence, fuch as Eleftion is, is diftin&ive of perfons 5 for this de- crees certain bleffings to certain perfons, and not to all. Election therefore is not of all, but of fome. 2. Ele&ion is not Legiflation. The fecret Coun- Kk fek ^o Of GKAC E. Chap. 10 fels of Princes are not th6r Edicts;, neither is Cods Sv^-^r—* Election a^Legiflation. Ele&ion is an Eternal De- ^Vs^T^- crec ' Legislation is in time. Election is but of fome, Legiflation extends to all. Ele&ion is that Decree, according to which God gives out fpiritual bleffings to fome as a Benefa&or : Legiflation fets down that Rule, according to which God deals with all as a Reftor who governs by Law. In the Covenant of Works, that \_do this and live] was not Ele&ion ; nei- ther was the oppofite member therein [_ tranjgreji and dye ] Reprobation. In the Covenant of Grace, that [ believe and be fazed] is not Election 5 neither is the oppofite branch therein [_ believe not and be damned] Reprobation^ for then all men, becaufe they are un- der both parts of the Evangelical Law, (hould be both eledted and reprobated , which is irnpoffible : nay, becaufe they were in Adam their head under both parts of the firft Covenant, they fhould be once before both elected and reprobated. It is one thing to prefcribethe terms of (alvation, another to chufe men to it : one thiqg to write down Laws for all, another to write down the names of fome in the book of Life. That general Law, All that believe /hall be faved, predeftinates none in particular. It would (tand true, if all men were left in unbelief and perdition; If there were no fiich thing as a Church in all the world, but elective, if it fecure not a Church to God, is altogether infignificant. It is an election of none, that is, no ele&ion. Our Saviour fets down two wills of God as diftindt 5 This is the will of him that fent me, That every one that feeth the Son^ and believeth on him, may have everlafting life, Joh. 6. 40. And in the precedent verfe , This is the Fa- Of G K ACE. 351 Fathers vriB 9 which bath jhtt Me, tk.it if all wbic h he Chap. 13. hath green ?;/c, Ifhould h In the one we u**v^/ have Gods kgillative Will defining the terms of Salva- tion for all ; in the other, we have C e Will dcligi.irg fome,that is, the elect, the given o The hrft without terms id it, would not be Le tion $ the latter without perfons in it, wo t be Election. 5. Election, being a chafing, a tinging out for/. to eternal life, muft need.- do fome Angular thing for them } it muft confer upon them fome diltinguilhir.g Grace, fuch as may re (live them out of the corrupt Mafs unto God: And what Grace is that but Faith? If all men did believe, there would be vo Imsv&i or difference among them ; the righteoufhefs of GoA would be upon them all, the rivers of living water would flow in them all, the Glory of Heaven would crown them all. Rut Faith is a differencing Grace, proper to Gods peculiar ones} it is not given to all, but to (bme; not out of common Providence, but out of Election : It is a choice, a prime Grace of Se- cretion, and therefore in all congruitv muft deeds if- fue out of the great delign of Secretion, that is, Ele- ction. If God give alike to all, then he elects none, he differences none; however men may make thcmfelves to differ, God doth no fuch thing, nor ever intended to do lb: Thus Flection is a meer nul- lity. But if, as the truth is, there be anvfuch thing as Election, then it beflow* upon the choien 0/ thole fpecial love-tokens of Faith and Perfevenu which make them meet for Heaven and eternal Blcf- fednefs. 4. Election is a fure infallible thing, fuch as never Kk 2 tails: 2 $ 2 Of GILA C E. Chap, i c. fails: Hence it is called p&teirp**, a Prsedeftination, u-*v*"*^ or praedefinition, (uch as never miffes the mark. Thus theApoftle, Whom he did predejlinate, them he alfo called 5 whom he called^ them he alfo juftifted 5 whom he jtiftified, them he alfo glorified^ Rom. 8. 30. The words (whom and them*) fatten every link to its precedent, and appropriate all throughout the whole chain to the fame perfons: every perfon, who is pre* deftinated and called within this Text, mud: be jufti- fied and glorified, or the golden chain of Grace is broken. The foundation of God Jlandeth ftre having thk feal the Lord knoweth them that are his^ 2 Tim; 2. 19. Ele&ion is a foundation, not an human one, but a foundation of God 5 laid in the Divine Will, (landing in eternity, fure in immutability, fealed up with infallible knowledg and unvariable love towards the elect: Nothing is more momentous than this, That God have a Church, Chrift a Body, and the Spirit a Temple. This is the higheft of defigns, the aim -of the Sacred Trinity, the very thing upon which God hath (et his eyes and his heart more than upon all the world befides, yet if Eleftion be not fure and in- fallible, that high and precious defign may be fru- (irate and^ of no effect : And what a blot would this be to Providence ? And how unbecoming would it be to the Holy one, who fits at the Stern and rules all? If (o accurate a thing as Providence could, which it cannot without difparaging it felf, (tumble or faulter in the things of nature 5 yet furely it can- not do fo in its mafter-piece,in the high and precious concerns of Grace: Eleftion therefore muft be fure rbtk, 1. jr. c. and infallible. That diftin&ion of the Socinians 17.de prsddl. ^ t jj at t j iere i s a double Eleftion in God, an infirm one Of GRACE. 253 one of thofe, who aflent to the Gofpel, and a firm Chap, 10 one of thofe, who live according to the Gfrfpel) is, frivolous and blafphemous$ it is in cffeft to fav, tTiat there is infirmity in God, that Gods choice is weak or rather none at all, and mans choice fupplies and ftrengthens it. The great defign of a Church could not be fecurcd by fuch a choice as mans, nor by any thing lets than Gods} his Ele&ion is a fure founda- tion, his fpecial call according to purpofe, and his gifts without repentance. Hence it appears, That according to the opinion of the Remonftrants, there is indeed no fuch thing as Ele&ion. They fay, that the objeft of Eleftion is a Believer 5 and, whether there (hall be a Believer or not, after all the opera- tions of Grace, ultimately depends upon the Will of Man: And if fo, How can God eleft any one perfbn in the world? The ad of his Eleftion depends upon the object, and the objedt upon the will of Man 5 Mans will mud: go forcmoft, and make theobjeft^ or elfe for want of one, Gods Will mud ftand (till, and not chufe at all. It's true, God hath fet down this Law or Rule, That believers fhould be laved 5 but no-where hath he (aid, that believers fhould be elefr- ed:, for that would overthrow his own Ele&ion, fuppofing fuch a Law or- Rule, That believers fhould be elefted. If a Man did believe, and fb was eleft- ed , it would not be Gods firft Law or after-choice, but mans faith which determined the mattenhe would be his own eledtor^ God in the mean time would not be an Ele&or, but a Legiflator only. But a little further, to confider the opinion of the Remonftrants: They fet down the order of Gods Decrees in this manner 3 upon Adams fall, there was a merciful - af- feftion 3^4 Of G R AC E. Chap. 10. fe&ion in God towards man} but, juftice ftanding in the way, a Mediator was ordained to offer up a propitiatory Sacrifice to God. Hereupon God makes a general Decree, That all pei fevering believers (hall be faved 5 and, becaufe man cannot believe of him- felf, God decrees, media ad Jidem^ means to beget Faith 5 and as (bon as men believe, there is a particu- lar Decree for their Salvation 5 or a kind of incom- pleat Election, fuch as riles and falls with their Faith, and when they arrive at the full point of perfeve- rance, the Ele&ion becomes compleat and perempto- ry. This is their Scheme 5 here many things are ob- fervable, Here's a Mediator Decreed, without refpeft to that Church, which in Scripture is the choice mark aimed at in the work 5 here's a general Decree to fave all perfevering believers, and in that inftant, no De- cree of the media adfidem^ the means to beget Faith 5 here's a ftrange imperfection attributed to God, his Will in its eternal afts muft be in fucceffion, and make its gradual progreffes from a general Decree to a per- ticular, and from an incompleat Election ( I tremble at the word ) to a compleat one } and in its pailage to that compleature, it muft all the way vary, and turn about to every point, as the fickle will of man doth 5 that ftanding in Faith there is an Ekftion, that falling there is none 5 and fo, toties quoties^ as often as it pleafes man to (hew himfelf variable, the Election will be fomething or nothing as it happens. This doth not indeed afcribe eyes and hands to God, as the grofi Anthropomorphites did} but it aflimu- lates him to the filly turnings and variations of the creature, which cannot but be very unworthy of him. Here is fuch a particular Ek&ion as is temporal, and to- Of GRACE. 2 ^ totally fuperfluous: it is temporal 5 for if it depend Chap. 10. upon pcrfevering faith as its condition, then it mutt be iufpended , and not in aft, till that faith be in be- ing. It's condition being temporal, it cannot pre- exift or be eternal. It is alfo totally fuperfluous, there being a general Decree of faving all perfevering believers once pad, every individual man who is a perfevering believer, mull: needs infallibly arrive at Heaven without any more ado 5 and then to what purpofe is fuch a particular Eleftion ? Neither do I think, that the Remonftrants would ever have offered fuchaninfignificant thing to the world, but that they were under a neceffity to (ay fomewhat to thofemany and fimous expreflions which are found in Scripture, touching the eleftion and predeftination of perfons, which could not be fatisfied with that general Law, That whofoever believeth flwuld be faved : Here's an eleftion of perfevering believers 5 but in plain terms that is no eleftion at all. Eleftion muft be to fome- thing, but this is to juft nothing : not to Faith and Holinefs, thefe are prefuppofed in the objeft 5 and there can be no eleftion to that which is prefuppofed before. There is therefore no eleftion to Grace at all. No, nor to Glory : That perfevering believers had a right unto by the general Decree of faving fuch as they are 5 and there can be no eleftion to that which they had an antecedent right unto. Thus all the great expreflions in Scripture touching Eleftion, vanifh into nothing. In Eleftion God fevers and dif- ferences one man from another in a way of choice : but according to the Remonftrants, he gives all in common. And how can God cleft without a fevering or differencing aft ? Or how can he do fuch an aft, who 7 -$6 Of GRACE. Chap. 10. who gives all in common? It's true, God fevers final v-v^*-' believers to life, and final unbelievers to death 5 but here is no choice of perfons } fome go to life, but all, •if final believer?, fhould do fo : fome go to death, but all, if final unbelievers, (hould do fo. Here is no choice at all, but a meer judicial aft, according to the Evangelical Law. When a Judg according to Law acquits one as innocent, and condemns another as guilty, it is not an aft of choice, but of righteous judgment. No more is it in God to ad judg believers to life, and unbelievers to death. But I (hall fay no more touching the firft thing, That there is an Ele- ction. 2. Eleftion is of meer Grace. It hath no other caufe but the Divine pleafure only. We are predejii- nated according to the good pic a jure of hk W/,Eph. 1.5. To thepraifeof the glory of hk grace ', v. 6. God loves his people becaufe he loves them, Deut. 7. 8. He faith, I will he gr adorn to whom I will he gracious, Exod. 33. 19. In which words we have will and grace doubled as the only reafon of it (elf. Eleftion is the primum indehitum 5 if that be not purely free in Conf ad Pol. God, nothing can be fo. Iniqmts e/?, faith Seneca, cap. 29. qui mnne) is Jut arhitrium danti non reliquit 5 He is uajuft who leaves not a gift to the pleafure of the giver. All fouls and graces are Gods, and he may difpofe of them as he pleafeth. If he chu(e any to himlelf, he chufes freely, elfe it is no choice at all : it is not, as the Apoftle calls it, an eleclion of Grace. Eleftion is not built upon forefeen works, for then it would not be an eleftion of Grace, but of Works, the eleft would not be veffels of Mercy, but of Me- rit : neither is it founded upon forefeen faith and per- Of GK AC E. 257 perfeverance 5 thefe are given by God not to all, but Chap. 10. to fome} not out of common Providence, but out of the Decree of Ele&ion. Hence the Apoftle, when he bleffes God for the work of Faith in the Thejjalo- nians , elevates his praifes up to Ele&ion, the firft fountain of Grace, Knowing, brethren Leloved, your eleUion of God, 1 Thef. 1. 4. And, when he praifes God, for bleffwg the Ephejians w r ith all fpiritual blef- fings in Chrift, he fets down the eternal rule of dif- penfing them, According as he hath chofen us, Ephef. I. 3, 4. He doth not choofe us according to our faith and perfeverance, but bleffes us with thefe bleffings according to Ele&ion 5 he chufes us, not becaufe we are holy, but that we fhould be fuch: Doth God forefee any good in men, when he willeth to them their firft good ? Or, Doth he forefee good in them, before he wills it to them? What need then of his purpofe to give it ? Or how can he poffibly be the Donor of it? If he forefee it, they will infallibly have it, whether he Decree it or not 5 they will have it without his gift, which is impoffible. Faith there- fore and perfeverance do not prefuppofe Ele&ion, but Election is the eternal fpring of thofe graces. Unlefs this be granted, God doth but eligere eligentes^ chufe thofe that firft chufe him: Mans faith muft be earlier than Gods Grace, he chufes before he is cho- fen -•> loves before he is loved of God. And to affert this, What is it, but to lift up man above God, Mans Will above the Sovereign Will of his Maker? A vani- ty it is,and a blafphemy againft the fountain of Grace, which the Saints blefs and adore, as the origine of all that good which is in them. Gods electing Grace, is pure Grace 5 his Love is meerly from himfelf : L 1 Hence s 5 S Of GRACE. Chap, ic* Hence is that emphatical reduplication, The eletf i^-^*-^ whom he hath chofen, Matt. 13. 20. As if our Savi- viour had faid, in Eleftion there is nothing but pure Election, nothing on mans part, all is from the good pleafure of God. This Truth is notably fet forth in our Saviour Chrift , he was Gods chofen Servant, Matt. 12. 18. The Lamb fore-ordained, 1 Pet. 1. 20. And, as St. Aufiin ftiles him, pr£clarijjimum lumen prddefiinationis & gratia , the moft famous light of Predeftination and Grace. He was as man, predeftinated to the fii- perlative glory of the Hypoftatical Union } and that not out of any forefeen holinefs in his human nature, for all that did flow out of that union , but out of meer grace: the human nature did not do or merit ought to be advanced into that ineffable excellency 5 neither may any man fay, Cur non & ego .-> this 5 Proferant ab or be condito vel unius Pagani ex em- eterm. .23 • pfa^ fa^ ^ e ^ L et j.^^ bring forth, if they can, the example of one Pagan fince the world began, who by the right ufe of naturals attained to Evangelical Grace. One would think that fuch as Socrates and Plato might, if any, rightly ufe naturals 5 but they had not the Gofpel manifested to them, which yet hath been revealed to the poor Americans, who com- paratively to the other were brutifh and barbarous. That of the Schools, Facienti quod in fe eft Deus non Serm: printed ^ eneqa f a ra tiam, is (as Bifhop Saunderfon in his Ser- An.vom.1612. ^ 1 1 1 • N l • 1 JC J • fol. 2?5. mons calleth it ) the rotten principle and foundation of the whole frame of Arminianifm : ultimately it refblves all into nature 5 Salvation is refblved into Faith, Faith into the Gofpel preached, that into the ufe of naturals. Nature may now lift up its hand, and touch the Crowns of Glory above. Grace may fall down to fo low a rate, as to be earned at the fingers ends of Nature. And what is this but pure impure Pelagiavifm ? In the Paleftine Synod Pelagim, but for his counterfeit recantation, had had a juft anathema for that faying, Gratiam dart fecundum merita. Secun- dum merita with the Fathers, is all one with fecundum opera, and fecundum opera all one with facienti quod in je eft. The Apoltle flatly oppofes this opinion 5 He hath called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpofe and grace^ 2 Tim. 1. 9. The call is not according to works, or according to the ufe of naturals 5 but meerly, purely, totally from Grace. Rightly to ufe naturals, is to live up to the light of nature 3 that tells us> that God is the Supreme good, and therefore in all reafbn to be loved Of GRACE. 261 loved with a fupreme love. Wefhould not give him Chap. 10 part of the price, but all the mind, heart, foul, fpirit, and that in pure perfedcion 5 and who, where is the Saint on earth that doth (b? Their purcftaftsof love come forth ex Ufo frincipio,ox\t of an heart fan&ified but in part} and in their egrels from thence cannot but have a taint or tinfture from the indwelling cor- ruption : and may we imagine that God fhould offer the Pagans a Gofpel on (iich terms as no Saint on earth ever arrived at ) Or that he would have them go about by the way of perfection to enjoy a Gofpel of Grace ? It cannot be. But fuppofe that they may have it upon a (incere love of him 5 Can a Pa- gan out of natural Principles truly love God i May true Love be without Faith the Root, or without the Spirit, the infpirer of all Graces ? Or doth the Holy Spirit work in a fupernatural way, without a Gofpel or Ordinances ? Or if it did , doth it work, and not efFeft lb much as the firft element in Chriftianity? I mean a ienfe of the want of Grace? May the Spi- rit converfe in thole unclean places, where nothing appears but Error , Pride, Idolatry, Impiety, and Wickednels of all forts } It is not realbnable to be- lieve it. If Nature could lift up it felf to a fincere love of God, the Spirit and the Gofpel feem to be fuperfluous thereunto. And as for habenti dabitur it (peaks not to the point in hand , becaufe it fpeaks not of the ufe of natural talents : not in Mat.i 3, for there it is accommodated to the Parable of the feed, and given as an item to finch as heard the Gofpel 5 nor yet in the 25^ chap, for there the ufe of the ta- lents is remunerated with eternal life, ver. 21 & 293 which is a Crown too rich to be fet upon meer na- turals. 262 Of GRACE. Chap. io. turals. There the talents uponabufe are taken away^ and by confequence, if it were meant of naturals, the abufers muft lofe their reafon, and become fools, which experience denies. But whatever the talents are in that promife, it muft be interpreted in eodem genere : If of talents of Nature, it runs thus 5 He that ufeth naturals, fhall have more of them. If of talents of Grace, thus : He that ufeth Supernatural*, (hall have more of them. But to ftretch this promife a genere ad genus, from naturals to fupernaturals, as if Nature might per falutm be crowned with Grace, is an interpretation very incongruous, and direftly con- trary to that of the Apoftle , He hath called us, not according to our works, but according to his own grace. The end of this promife is to excite men to the good ufe of talents. But after fuch an unreafonable ftretch of it, as makes Grace the reward of Nature, What can come of it ? Where (hall the fruit of it be ? Not in the Church, there they have the Gofpel-grace al- ready 3 nor yet out of it, there it is not revealed : neither is it poffible that tbofe who want the Go- fpel, (hould be ftirred up by any promife in it, to feek after it in the ufe of naturals. Thus we fee, that the external call is not a debt to Nature, but a meer gift of Grace. Such as the great Gift is, fuch is the Charter. The great gift of Chrift was purely, to- tally gratuitous 5 therefore the Charter of the Go- fpel, which in the manifeftation of it is the external Call, is foalfo. 2. The Internal call is of Grace : And here, be- caufc fome oppofe this call, I fhall firlt fhew, That there is (uch a call, and then that it is meerly of Grace. 1. There Of GRACE. 263 I. There is fuch a thing as an internal call. Pela- Chap. 10. gfr& v at leaft in the firfc draught of his He reiy, placed v^-v—^ Grace only, in libero ar'uitrio & dotirma, in Free-will and Doftrine «, Free-will being Nature not Grace, Doftrine being Grace but not the all of it, he left no room at all for an Internal call, he allowed no Grace but that external one of Doctrine : and in this he fpakc very confonantly to his other opinions, de- nying Original (in as he did, What need could there be of internal Grace ? There being no fpot or finful defeft in the Soul, Grace hath nothing to do within, all is well and whole there, and needs no Phyfitun ; all is in order and harmony there, and nothing to be new-made or new-framed. Therefore St. Aujlin ob- ferves , that though Pelagius would fometimes talk of a multiform and ineffable Grace 5 yet it was but to put a blind, and cover over his herefy: Still he quid jam** meant no more than meer Doftrine, and external l *P m ' > w 1 * Grace; denying Original fin, there was nothing eandem^rem within for Grace to do or reftify. Socir?us r who^it, utnon with the Pelagians denies Original fin, makes little JJJ wn fc«"" 1 or no account of internal Grace, though in his Pr£- ft rina gratiam le&ions he fpeak of an interius auxilium, an inward ™nftituere ? . aid 5 yet he faith, That Faith is generated, potijfimnm m. cap.' 9. "* per externa^ chiefly by externals 5 and again, That De - ferv - P ars Faith is rather to be called Gods command than his 3e%rt!Yo?l 3." gift. But that there is fuch a thing as an Internal call, and that difkinft from the external , I (hall propofe three or four things. 1. All in the Church have an external call; but fome are not fo much as illuminated, it is not give n to them to know the heavenly myfteries. Thole by the way-fide heard the word and underftood it nor 5 Chrift atf 4 Of G KA CE. Chap. 10. Chrift was a (tumbling block to the Jews, and fool- c**-v-^ ifhnefs to the Greeks 5 and both becaufe he was not, though outwardly propofed, inwardly underftood. Chrift the power of God, if underftood, could not )f ■ V^*rL J^'^have been a (tumbling block to the Jews who looked ^^^fifcafter figns^ Chrift the Wifdom of God, if under- J*Y Chr&ty ^ftood, could not have been foolifhnefs to the Greeks, \ fc who fought after Wifdom. Mr. Pemb/e relates this Story: An Old Man, of above 6c years of Age, a conftant hearer of the Word, was after all (b grofly ignorant, as upon Difcourfe to fay, that God was a good old Man, Chrift a towardly youth, the Soul a great bone in the body 5 and the happinefs of man after death, was to be put into a pleafant green Mea- dow. Such poor blind Souls have indeed an external call, but not (b much as the firft element of the inter- nal one 5 Illumination, which is the initial thing therein, is wanting in them. 2. All in the Church have an external call 5 but fome are for their iniquity judicially hardned under the means: the Word of Life is to them the favour of death , Chrift the Corner-ftone a ftumbling-block : the light blinds them, the melting ordinances harden them. Thefe men have an external call, but nothing of an internal one 5 it being impoffible that the lame perfons, under the fame means, fhould be illuminated and (oftened, which are the effecls of an internal call , and at the fame time (hould be blinded and hardened under the means, which cannot but have in them an external one. 3. Some under the Gofpel have a wonderful work wrought in them, their eyes are opened upon the E- vangelical Myfteries, their wills are melted into the Di- Of G KA CE. i6$ Divine Will. Gods Law is engraven in their heart 5 Chap. 10 his image is the beauty and glory of their fouls : A great work is done in them, a new-creation appears within 5 and how fbould this be, or which way fhould it be effected, but by that internal call which calls things that are not, as though they were, whichin a glorious way calls Faith and other Graces into being ? • Hence the Apoftle faith, That the Gofpel came to the Thejjalonians not in word only, but in power and inthe Holy Ghoft, and in much affurance, 1 27?e/. 1.5. Here's the true internal call} the word did not only outwardly found to them, no, it was inwardly engrafted to the faving of the foul 5 it was ftrongly and fweetly let home upon the heart , fo as to produce Faith and Love. It was not in meer notions, but it fprung up into a new-creature. This is the internal call. If a meer external one might have done it, Pelaghts in the* rudeft draught of his Herefie had been in the right. He placed Grace in meer Doctrine and Free-will-, but to the framing of the new-creature, an internal ope- ration is requifite. Hence St. Aujiin faith, That be- De Praedeft. lievers have not only, as others, an outward Preacher, L *• ca P- 8 - but an inward one : Intus a patre andinnt , they hear and learn of the Father. He fpeaks to them inward- ly in fuch words of life and power as produces the new-creature. 4. The Miniftry of Chrift was a very excellent one : He fpake, did, lived, as never man did 5 there were Oracles in his mouth, Miracles in his hands, San- ctity in his life. Never was there fuch an external call as here 5 yet would this do the work? Would this fecure a Church or people to God? No 5 He tells them plainly, That except they were born of the M m Spirit, 2 66 Of G R A C E. Chap. 10. Spirit, they could not enter Heaven. That no man wx-v-^ can come to him except the Father draw him. There muftbe an internal tra&ion, or elfe there would be never a believer in the world. Trahitur mirk modk lib x^cap °9*. Ht ve ^ a ^ 7 ^ < F 7 nov ^ ™* m ~ lfl f Pfa homimim cordi- bits operari$ In this Tra&ion there is a fecret and ad- mirable touch upon the heart to make it believe and receive Chfift: This is an internal call indeed. Yet, as pregnant as the words are, the Socwians have an art to turn Gods Traftion into MansDifpofition, and the Divine energy, into human probity 5 Vkpr^cipua in audkntium pr obit ate confijlcbat, the chief force con- Prxl. Theol. fifts in the probity of the auditors. Thus Socinus cap. 12. touching that Tra&ion. Thofe who have probity of mind, who will do Gods Will 5 thofe honeft Souls will embrace the Gofpel. When God is faid to touch the heart, 1 Sam. 10. 26, the meaning is, they had tangible hearts, fuch as were inclinable to the Di- f* lap" i Rd ' vine WiU * fo Vol kbti*. And again, when God draws men, he propofes his Will 5 and the probi, the honeft De ver.Rel. hearts are perfwaded : fo the fame Author. I hus by lib. s.cap. 18, an oc jj perverfe interpretation of Scripture , the choiceft operations of Grace are at laft refbl- ved into nature and freewill. This more plainly appears by that explication which Volhelius in the place firft quoted , gives us of probity. There are (faith he) in Man three things, Keafbn, Will, and Appetite, if the Will, the middle faculty, apply it (elf to Reafon,there is probity^ if to the Ap- petite, there is improbity. We fee here what pro- bity is, the meer produft of the Will 3 Faith is re- folved into probity, and probity into the Will of man: There is no need of Grace, at leaft not of an * in- Of GR AC E. 267 internal one. The probity rcquifite to Faith, is ac- Chap. 10 4 cording to thefe men much the fame, as Anjlotle re- i*^->r-^ quires from the auditors of morality, that is, that they aft **]** a6>o", according toReafon: Thus accord- Etb.L 1. c 5. ing to them there is nothing of Myftcry or Grace in this Traftion , but only a following the common principles of nature 5 out of this temper Faith will 'fpring up. But do thefe men believe Scripture? There the natural unregenerate man is thus defcribed: He is dead in fin, A corrupt tree which cannot bring forth good fruit, He perceives not (piritual things 5 His carnal mind is not fubjeft to the Law, nor indeed can be 5 Without grace he cannot do good, no, nor fo much as fpend a thought about it 5 He is a ftranger from the life of God, and blindnefs is upon his heart: and can there be any true probity in fuch an one? The Corinthians, at leaft fome of them, were before their conversion, Fornicators, Idolaters, Adulterers, Effeminate , Abufers of themfelves with Mankind, Thieves, Covetous, Drunkards, Revilers , Extor- tioners, 1 Cor. 6. 9, and 10. And what probity was * Qpi lluI "ili- in them? True probity, fuch as is towards God, is emi^umanL" no other than fincerity^ and iincerity is not one fubjungunt Grace, but the rectitude of all. And may fuch a g rat i*-adjuto- thing go before Faith? Where true probity is, there oSentcs & is a pure intention to do Gods Will, and may it an- humiiesfimus, tecede that Faith, which is the fingle eye, and works tmltt by love? Probity is not an off-fpring of nature but confentiunr, of Graces could Free-will elevate it felf to it, there T *f u ™ A P°' ' would need no traction, no innuence or Grace at all. quid babes, * The Fathers in the Araujican Council, condemn < i U0 .^. I J on ac - thofe, who Subordinate Grace to mans humility or ^DcjYuin*" obedience, as if humility and obedience were not quod fum- M m 2 silts tonc - Arau '- 2 - can. 6. 268 Of GKA CE. Chap. 10. gifts of Grace: To conclude, the Fathers Tra&ion doth not (land in mans probity, but in a Divine ener- gy, fuch as produces faith in the heart. 2. The internal call is meerly of Grace. The Spi- rit breathes where it lifts. God calls as he pleafes : fome are called according to purpofe 5 all are not fo. Every heart under the Evangelical means, is not open- ed as Lydias was. God works in us to will and to do of his good pleafure. If God be God, an infinite Mind, he muft needs be free 5 if free in any thing, he muft be fo in a£te of Grace, in his calling men home unto himfelf. It is true, that according to fome, the Spirit is annexed to the Gofpel, and works equally on all the Auditors. But this opinion labours under pro- digious confequences ^ I mean, fome fuch as thefe fol- lowing are. The Holy Spirit, whofe prerogative it is to breathe where he lift, and divide to every one as he will, is here affixed to his own organ the Go- fpel, and muft part out his Grace equally to all : The Ordinance of Preaching, as if it were no longer a meer Ordinance, or pendant on the Spirit, muft con* fer Grace, if not ex opere operato, yet in a certain pro- mifcuous way to all. The Minifter, who ufes to look up for the fpirit and excellency of power to fucceed his labours, may reft (ecure, all is ready and at hand. The peoples eyes, which ought to wait on the Lord, if peradventure he will give faith and repentance to them, will foon fall down and center on the Ordi- nance, where they are lure without a peradventure to have their (hare of Grace. Thofe emphatical Scrip- tures, which (peak of Angular Grace to fome, muft now run in a much lower ftrain. The opening of Lydias heart, how remarkable foever, muft be no lin- gular Of GRACE. 269 gular Grace, but common to the reft. The traftionsChap. 10 and inward teachings of the Father, which make <-^~^'~• , ' fbme to come to Chrift, muft be general favours, and extendible to thofe who come not to him. When the Apoftle faith, That Chrift k to the Jews a fumbling- block^, and to the Greeks foolijlmejs 5 but to them that are called, the power and wifdom of God, 1 Cor. l. 23,24, How fignal foeverthe difference in the Text be, the internal call muft be all one 5 in thofe to whom Chrift was a ftumbling-block and foolifhnels, as in tho(e to whom he was the power andwifdom of God. The called according to pnrpofe, are called but as other men : Gods purpofe is to call all a-like, mans only makes the difference. Thefe are the confe- quences of that opinion, and too heavy, I confefs, for me to ftand under. I reft therefore in that of the Apoftle, He hath called us^ not according to our T»orks y but according to hk own purpofe and grace, 2 Tim. 1.9. Here purpofe and grace are joined together 3 if his purpofe be free, if his grace be gratuitous, then he calls as he pleafes. In calling men home to himfelf^ he afts purely, totally from Grace. I conclude with that of Bonazenture, Hoc piarum mentium eft, ut nihil fibi tribuant, fed totum Dei Gratia 5 The genius of pi- ous minds, is to attribute nothing to themfelves, but all to Grace. Thus far touching the firft thing, The fie^nefs of Grace. The next thing propofed, is the power and efficacy of Grace. The Apoftle fpeaks of an exceeding great- nefs of power towards thofe that believe, Eph. 1.19. So emphaticd are the words there , that Camero is Cm - °pcr fol, bold to fay, Nemo, cut non perht frons, negare potefi^^' (ignificare vim & potentiam^ None, who hath not loft his i 7 o Of G RA CE. Chap. 10. his modcfty, can there deny a force and power (igni- c^-v^^ fied. Now touching the efficacy of Grace, I (hall confider three things. i. Its efficacy as to the Principle of Faith and o- ther Graces. 2. Its efficacy as to actual believing and willing. 3. Its efficacy as to perfeverance in the faith. The firft thing is its efficacy as to the Principle of Faith, and other Graces. By the Principle of Faith, I mean not the natural power of believing. God doth not command us to take down the Sun, for which we have no faculties:, but to believe, for which we have an underftanding and a will 5 no natural fa- DePrzd. c. 5. ca ' tv ls wanting. Hence St. Aujl'm faith, the pojje of believing* is of nature. This .power in fain man, be- caufe in conjunftion with natural impotency, never arrives at the effect. The natural faculties are by the fall fo vitiated, that though in a fenfe he can, yet he will not believe. Trahitfm qmmq\ voluptas, one luff or other fb at t rafts him, that he cannot a fe impetrare nt vclit, he cannot find in his heart JOtdo it. He hath a kind of can in his natural faculties, but the corrup- tion blafts the erleft. Neither do I mean that power, which, as fome Divines fay, is fupernatural, yet not an habit or vital principle of faith. Nature being fallen, Grace (fay they) gives a fecond power to fet the will in aquihbrio\ but that power doth not, as an habit, incline or difpofe a man to actual believ- ving. This power, as I take it, is nothing but Na- ture and Free-will. I fee not how it (liould be di- ftinft from it. There are (as the Learned Doctor Th'7/fhath obfervedj three things in the foul:, that if, Powers, Habits, and Paffions. Powers may be the fab- Of GRACE. 271 fubjefts of Habits and Paffions 5 but may a Power be -Chap. 10. the fubjeft of a Power? A natural power of a fu- pernatural one? This looks like a Monfter. By the fame reafon Habits may be the fubjefts of Habits, and Paffions of Paffions. And is this power of believing, free or not ? If free, then it is not fupcrnatural 5 it may be a principle of not b:lieving, and that no- thing fupernatural can be. If not free, then it de- termines the event, but to what ? To not believing? then it is not fupernatural. To believing ? then all men ( having, as thefe men (ay, the power ) muft in- fallibly believe, which Scripture and experience deny. I mean therefore fuch a Principle of Faith, as is an habit and vital Principle 5 fuch as is feminally and virtually faith 5 fuch as hath the nature and ellence of faith 5 fuch as inclines and difpofes to actual be- lieving, and before the aft, denominates a man a be- liever. When the aft of faith comes forth into be- ing, is it from a believer, or from an unbeliever ? If from a believer, then there was an habit of faith be- fore. If from ail unbeliever, how unnatural is it, and how crofs to the fuavity of Providence ? There muft then be an aft of faith, before a principle 5 a fruit, before a tree or feed. What (hall we fay of fuch an one? He is a believer in aft, but in principle none $ as foon as the aft ceafcs, he is not at all a believer. There muft therefore be an habit 3 a vital principle of faith: This in the ufe of means is infafed or created, and that by the power of grace. To clear this, Khali lay down two or three things. 1. The Principle of Faith and other Graces, is not produced by meer fuafion, by a meer propofal of the Evangelical objeft. In converfion there is a great work 272 Of G R A C E. Chap, i o, work wrought within 5 the deadly wound of Origi- nal corruption muft be healed, the new creature muft be let up in us } and can fuaiion do this? Such a glo- rious work muft be done by an efficient caufe, not by a meer allicient one, fuch as fuafion is. A natural man is blind, nay dead in fpiritual things } and what fuafion can make the blind to fee, or the dead to rife ? Suafion is fo far from giving a faculty, that it prefup- pofes it. The ufe of it is not to confer a power, but to excite and ftir it up into aft. Satan ufe fuafion to fubvert the fouls of men 5 and doth God do no more to convert them unto himfelf? How then fhould he ever gather a Church to himfelf? Satans fuafions run with the tide and ftream of corrupt nature:, but Gods are againft it } and in all reafon the balance will be caft rather on that fide which hath Natures vote and free concurrence, than on that which hath Natures re- pugnancy and contradiction. In this work there is more than meer fuafion. God is not a meer Orator, but an admirable Operator 5 his word is not fignifica- tive only, but faftive, commanding thofe Divine Principles into being, vox imperativa abit in operati- vam 5 he calls for a new heart, and it is fo. 2. This holy Principle is not produced by affift- ent Grace, as if a natural man did by Divine affift- ance work it in himfelf. The Principle or power of believing, is either natural or fupernatural 5 if natu- ral, it is by creation 5 if fupernatural, it is by infu- fion or infpiration 5 neither way is it produced in a way of afliftanec. An affiftance is not accommoda- ted to a thing to produce a new power, but to bring forth an aft from thence. The light is affiftent to the eye in the aft of vifion, but it gives not the vifive power Of GRACE. a 73 power to it 5 aftifting grace concurs to the aft of Chap. 10 believing, but it confers not a believing principle. W"v— ^ The greateft Saint in the world ftands in need of af- fifting grace, that his gracious principles may come into aftual exercife} he muft have help from the holy one, a fupply of the Spirit of Chrift 5 the Heavenly roots do not caft forth themfelves unlefs God be as dew to them} the fweet (pices do not flow out actu- ally, unlefs God breath upon them by auxiliary grace} ftill he wants aftiftance to the doing of good as he ought 5 the greateft Saint, though a man full of di- vine principles, ftands in need of aftiftance. And doth a natural man, one void of good, fraught with evil , need no more ? Is regenerating quick- ning, renewing, new-creating grace, nothing but an aftiftance only ? May any one believe that the holy Spirit in Scripture (hould give fuch high ftately titles to an aftiftance only ? May a man be a co-operator, or co-partner with God in the raifing up faith and a new creature in himfelf ? It's true, a natural man may by a common grace enter upon preparatories 3 he may attend upon the means, but what can he con- tribute to the work it (elf? he is meerly natural, the new creature is totally fupernatural, and what can he do towards it ? could he contribute ought, what would the new creature be ? muft it not be part na- tural as from man, part fupernatural as from God 5 part old as from nature , part new as from grace ? Thus it muft be if this great work be divided be- tween God and man. Notable is that of Laffantiut, D? &l- R«l. govern Junonemque a juvando ejje diSos Cicero inter- ap,II< pretatur, & Jupiter quafi Juvans Pater cliclus, quod t?o- men in Deum minimi congruit, quia juv are ho minis eji y N n opk 274 Of GRAC E. Chap. IO. opts aliquid conferentis in eum qui (It egens alicujus be- nefieii : nemo (Ic Deum precatur, ut fe adjuvet, fed ut fervet, ut vitam filutemque tribuat \ nullus pater dici- tur filios juvare cum eos generut ant educate illud enim levins ejl quam ut eo verbo magnitudo paterni benefilii exprimatur, quanto id magfc eji inconveniens Deo, qui verus eft Pater, per quern fumus , cujus toti fumus, a quofingimur, animamur, & iUuminamur ? And at laft he concludes, Non inteliigit benefcia diving qui Je juvari modo a Deo putat, He underftands not divine benefits, who thinks himfelf only helped by God. jfe- hovah muft not be transformed into a Jupiter, or a meer helper § man muft not (hare with him in this great work, it is God who makes us new creatures, and not we our (elves. We are his workmanjhip, not our own, Ephef. 2. 10. Born not of the will of man, but of God, Joh. 1. 13. As foon as a man is regenerate, it may be truly (aid of hirn, Hie homo jam natus eft ex Deo, this man is now born of God ; but to (ay, that he is in part born of mans will, is to blafpheme the Author of our fpiritual being, and to crown Nature inftead of Grace. 3. The holy principles of Grace are produced by an aft of Divine power : God lays the foundations of faith and the new creature, as it were in mighty wa- ters, in the very fame heart in which there is a foun- tain and torrent of corruption 5 and no power le(s than the Divine can put back the ftream of nature, and (et up the Heavenly ftrufture of Grace in (iich an heart. The production of gracious principles is in Scripture (et forth in glorious titles, fuch as do im- port power 5 'tis called aTranftation, Col. 1. 13. it traniplants and carries us away out of a ftate of fin in- to Of GRACE. a 75 to a ftate of grace. Tis a Generation, Jam. i. 18. it Chap. 10. begets us to a participation of the Divine Nature. Tis a RefirrecJion, Ephef. 2. 5. It quickens us and in- fpires into us a Supernatural life, of which the fall had left no fpark or relick at all. Tis a CreationJLph. 2.10. it raifes up a new creature out of nothing, and gives us a fpiritual being, which before we had not 5 and if thefe things do not fpeak power, nothing can. Hence the Apoftle fpeaks of the Gofpel coming in power, 1 Thef 1.5. Nay, that in the fuceefi of it there is an excellency of power, 2 Cor. 4. 7. and an exceeding greatnefs of power towards Believers, Eph. 1. 19. The work- of faith is faid to be fulfilled with power, 2 Thef. 1. 1 1. How much more muft it be an aft: of power to lay the Primordials and firft princi- ples of faith in a fallen unbelieving creature ? When there was nothing appearing in our lapfed nature, but a vacuum, z. chaos of fin, a fpiritual death and nullity, only the Divine power was able to repair the ruins of the fall, and rear up the Heavenly life and nature in us. This great truth was notably fet forth in the conception of our Saviour Chrift § it was not in the courfe of nature, his Mother knew not a man, but the Holy Ghojl came upon her 5 the power of the highefi overjhadovced her, that the holy thing might be horn of her, Luk. 1. 35. In like manner when Chrift is formed in the heart, when the new-creature is fet up in us, it is not in the way of nature 5 we know not the humane power in this work, here is no lefs than dextra excelji, the right hand of the moft High to effeft it :> here are vejligia fpiritus janili , the footfteps of the holy Spirit to bring it to pate: the fame power and fpirit which formed Chrift in the N n 2 womb, 2?6 Of GKA C E. Chap. 10. womb, formes him in the heart: as in his participati- on of the humane nature there was a Supernatural operation, fb is there in our participation of the Di- vine.This is the firft efficacy of Grace,it new creates the heartland imprints the Divine image there} it infpires holyPrinciples,and fb lays a foundation for obedience. 2.There is an efficacy of Grace as to aftual believing and willing. St. Bernard asks the queftion, Quid agit Dtl\Wkxh\tJ^ erum wbitrium ? What doth Free-will do? and & Grat. then anfwers, Salvatur, it is faved. And Agatho in his Epiftle lays down this as a rule, Quod a Chrifto Aft 4 ° non fufceptum eft, nee jalvatum eji,fiab eo human a vo- luntas fufcepta eft, & falvata eji 5 That which was not affumed by Chrift, is not faved by him. If an humane will was affumed, then it is laved } and it is faved, firft in that principles of holy re&itude are inftilled into it, and then in that thofe principles are drawn forth in aftual willing : both thefe are neceffary, the firft implants the vital principles of Grace in the heart, the fecond makes them bloffom and bring, forth pre- cious fruit 5 without thofe vital principles the will, however affifted ah extra, is internally in it felf but a faculty meerly natural and void of fpiritual life} it hath no proportion to the vital fupernatural a&s of Faith and Love. Neither is it poffible, that any fuch fhould ifTue out from thence, no, not by any extrin- fecal afliftance whatfoever : an aft if vital and fuper- natural, muft be from an internal principle that is fuch. Again, unlefs thofe vital principles bring forth a&ual believing and willing, they muft needs lie dead, and come to nothing. And yet if we eftimate things according to their worth and excellency, we cannot but think it much more eafie and eligible for the wife and Of GRACE. 2 77 and good Cod to fuffer an abortion in all the feeds Chap. 10. and principles of nature, than in thofe precious and ^^v^^-» admirable ones of Grace, which do not, as the o- ther do, carry the mecr footfteps, but the very image and refemblance of his holy nature. Pelagius would at lead in fbme fenfe own, that the pofle, the meer power of believing, is from God 5 but he would not have the velle^ the aftual willing and believing, to be fo, He faith, that God worketh all things 5 that is, he gives to them the operative power. He diftinguifhes three things, Pojffe, Vellc, Ejje 5 Pojjc Mfi.teGnt. innatura, Velle in arbitrio, Ejje in effe&n : Power, Chrift. cap.4. Willing, Being: Power is in nature, Willing in the free faculty, Being in the effeft. The Power, faith he, is properly from God 5 but the other two are from our ielves, as defcending de arbitrii fonte from the fountain of Free-will. Hence St. Aufiin tells him, That according to his opinion, which attributed to Grace not willing or believing, but a power only, he could not be a true Chriftian. A power of believing (whether it be as Pelagius would have it, a meer na- De Grat. ked power, and no more 5 or whether it be fuch a C6rifti,d©. power as is an habit or vital principle of Grace,) is not all that Grace operates 5 a meer nak^d power is not all. To entertain fuch a thought, is highly to di- fparage Grace. A power of believing is from Gods and is not a power of finning, fb too? If Free-will, which includes in it a power of finning, be a crea- ture, it muft be fo. If a power of finning be from God, and no more but a meer power of believing be from him, then how is God the author of aftual be- lieving, more than of aftual finning ? Pelagius fay- irg, That God is faid to operate all things, hecaufe he a 7 8 Of GRACE. Chap. 10. he gives the operative power 3 Bellartmne from thence ^ — v— *o infers this juft confequence , That then God operates LiL^'lib. a11 fln > becaufe he gave a Free-will, by which all fin 4 . cap. 4. * is wrought: Therefore if God be not the author of aftual fin, as he is not, nor cannot be 3 then neither is he author of a&ual believing, by giving a power to believe. Both powers are from God 3 and how hard a thing, and how contumelious to Grace is it to fay, That he produces as much towards finning, as to- m J wards believing? And yet we muft (ay lb, if there be no more than a meer power to both. Neither is liich a power, as is a habit or vital principle of Grace, all that Grace operates 5 thofe precious Seeds and Prin- ciples, were never let down from Heaven to deep and lye hid in the root, but to fpring up in a&ual Graces futable and congruous thereunto. There is a Divine vigor in thole Principles «, and when auxiliary Grace ftirs them up, and becomes an heavenly dew unto them , they will fpring up as a well of living water, and (hoot forth as the feed of God. There is a fpecial Providence watching over thefe, to make them come up in a crop of holy fruits. Some Divines exprels themfelves thus : Grace gives a fiipernatural power, and lb puts the will in it Chap. 10 renders them cafic, and in a fort natural : and may we, can wc, fuppofe that Grace, a Principle much more fublimc, and of far higher extraftion, fhould only put the foul into an aequilibrious ftate, no more pro pending to good than evil ? If Grace operate only a kind of indifferency, then the comfort of Chriftians is departed ; they are afraid of nothing more than of themfelves ; the vanity and corruption in their own hearts is terrible to them : yet in this cafe the greateft of fears, I mean, to be left to them- felves, falls upon them. They are not to look up to God to fix their hearts upon himfelf$ no, nor fo much as to incline them that way 5 their life muft not be a life of faith or dependence upon God the fountain of Grace ; there is no warrant for fiich a thing 5 Grace only works a ftate of indifferency., and then leaves the Will to do the reft : if they will depend upon any thing, it muft be upon their own Will, that is, upon Vanity 5 nothing elfe determines the great concern of their falvatiou. Now here I (hall firft prove , That Grace works the a&ual willing and believing 5 and then, That it doth it in a way of power. 1. Grace works the adtual willing and believing : And here I (hall lay down feveral things. 1. The Scripture is very pregnant. God worketh to will and to do of his good fie a fare, Phil. 2.13, m?yuv^ he worketh efficacioufly, not a meer power of wil- ling, but the very willing : Neither doth he work the willing conditionally, if we will ; for then the willing fhould be a condition to it fclf, which is im- pofiible, and fhould be before he works it, which is direftly 280 Of GR AC E. Chap. lc. dire&ly oppofite to the Text 5 but he works it ab- u— \^J folutely of his own good pleafure. His work doth not depend on mans confent, but it caufeth it 5 nei- ther doth he work it lb, as that man in whom he worketh the willing, might a&ually not will : for a man who wills, mult needs will 5 and a man in whom he works the willing, muft needs do fb. If a man do not will, then God doth not work the willing 5 for a willing which is not, is not wrought : in this cafe nothing is wrought but the power of willing, which fatisfies not the Text. If the man in whom he works, do will, the thing is infallible 5 for a man cannot will and nill both at once: but he worketh the willing fb, as that mans willing doth certainly fol- low upon it. Neither doth he work the willing as a partial concaufe, for then he fhould be a caufe only ex parte, and do but fomething towards it, the reft muft be not from him, but only from mans will as the author of it 5 which is to afcribe to mans will, not a merit only, but a kind of Deity, as if it were the fole author of fbme fiipernatural good. But he works the willing as a total fiipreme caufe 5 he cauleth man to will : Mans will doth not co-operate, but fubope- rate under the fweet power of Grace, moving it to will. It is true, man willeth, but it iscaulally from Grace that he doth fo. Mans will is the principium quod which produces the willing 5 but Gods Grace is the principium quo which caufeth it. Hence St.Auftin, ?evn°ap?vs.N° s n °l Hmu *, fid Deus in nobk operatur & veiled ttos operamur^ fed Deus in nobis operatur & ipfum operari pro bona from himfclf, and fo may the Chriftian too in the point of willing and believing} if thefc be not Grace, he need not look up to God for them. Again, for w 7 hat do the Saints praife God? Is it not for touching and opening their hearts to Chrift, for making them willing in the day of his power ? Is it not for putting his fpirit within them, and caufing them to walk in his ftatutcs ? What can be more due to God , more proper for a Saint than this ? Hence they glorified God in the repenting Gentiles, A&s 11. 18. And again, they glorified God in con- verting Paul, Gal. 1. 24. When David and his people offered willingly to God, he falls into an ho- ly extafie, Who am J, and what is my people, 1 Chr. 29. 14? All things, faith he, are of thee, not only our gold and our filver, not only our hearts and wills , . but our very aclual willingnefs alio} yet if the willing and believing be not of Grace, all thefe are but mockeries and falfe Hallelujahs: They who glorifie God in Converts, offer but a blind facrifice, and glorify but an Idol of their own fancy. If God do not do the thing, Why fhould we praife him for it? How can we do fo in truth, when the matter O o 2 Will 284 Of GKA C E. Chap. 10 will not bear it ? Indeed we do but diflemble apraife, making as if he were the author of that which is not from him. Thus we lee, that willing and believing muft be from Grace, or elfe we utterly evacuate thofe prayers and praifes which are offered up to God touching the lame. Thus much touching the firft thing, That Grace works the willing and believ- ing. 2. Grace works it in a way of power. St. Paul fpeaking of the fuccels of the Gofpel, faith, That the excellency of the power is of God , 2 Cor. 4. 7. And again, he prays for the Theffalonians, That God would fulfil the work^ of faith with power, 2 Thef 1. 1 1, If faith be fulfilled, as it is, by the afts of it, then thofe adts are produced by the power of Grace : Gods peo- ple are willing in the day of his power, Pfal 110. 3. When the Difciples wonder'd how a Camel {hould go through a Needles eye, how a rich man (hould be faved 5 our Saviour folves the knot by the power of God, With him all things are pojfible^ Luk. 18. 27. The power of Grace can fetch off the World, the Camels- bunch, from the heart, and make it pais ( as it were) through the Needles eye into Heaven. It's true, man wills, man believes , but it is from the ftrong and fweet gales of Grace that he dothfo. The willing and believing are voluntary atts in regard of mans will, but adts of power in regard of Gods Spirit,which touches and moves the heart thereunto. It may be thought by (bine , that there needs no expence of power towards willing and believing 5 that a power of willing and believing is enough for us. But fhould God give us only a power to willand believe,, and leave Of GRACE. 285 leave the reft to our will, we have great reafon to Chap. io« think that we fhould all do, as innocent Adam did, **s^>f m **J fall from God, and never reduce that power into aft. The Divine Principles in Adam were pure and without mixture 5 but the power of believing and willing in us, hath in the fame heart where it dwells, an Inmate of corruption, which continually counter- works it. In innocency the temptation ftood with- out, a-courtingthe (en(es$ but after the fall it makes nearer approaches, as having a party within ready to open and betray every faculty. To me it looks like a proud thought for any to imagine, that under fuch a difparity he could aft his part better than Adam did. If then the foundation of God mud (land, if the election muft obtain, if Chrift muft have a feed s if the Spirit muft have a temple , it is no lefs than neceffary^that the power of Grace fhould iecure that willing and believing, without which tho(e high and great defigns of Heaven cannot take effeft. 3. There is an efficacy of Grace as to perfever- ance in Faith and Holinefs. Perfeverance, wherever it is, is from Grace. The inherent Graces in the Saints ? are but creatures 5 no creature, no, not the moft (pi- ritual, doth or can preferve it (elf. All depend upon their Original in their being and duration 5 hence, as St. Jerom obferves, God is always a-working, al- Adctefiph. ways a-giving^ Non mihi Jujficit, faith he, quodjemel™?- & donavit^ nifi Jemper donaverit : It is not enough for me, that he once give, unlefi he always do (b. Hence that of St. Aujtm, Non it a Je debet homo ad Domi- De Gen, ad, num convert ere ', //f, cum ab eo fail us fuer'it jujlus^ ab- lt? Jcedat^ Jed it a ut ab illo Jemper Ji at : Man ought not to ■a8<$ Of GRACE. Chap. 10. to convert to God, that being made juft he might v^ — v**^ depart from him 5 but that he might be always made juft by hfcit. The Phyfician heals and departs, but God doth not do fo, he is ftill a-healing and new- making us by the continual fpirations of his Spirit and Grace, that we may perfevere unto the end. Were not perfeverance from Grace , there could be no fuch thing as a life of Faith ; it would be utterly needlefs to hang upon Promifes, or to look up for in- fluences of Grace, or with David to pray that God would keep the good frame in the heart, or hold up our goings in his paths. Perfeverance being from our (elves, we may center and fafely lye down there. We may fay as Lao dice a, We are rich, and have need of nothing, no, not of God the Fountain of Grace. We may do what St. Jerom charges on the Pelagians^ AdCtefcap3. t h at j s _ bid God depart, he is no more nVceflary to us. It's true, he gave us a ftock of power and free- will 5 but now we can (land upon our own bot- tom, all is in our own hand, there is no room for a life of faith, no, nor for any true gratitude for our DeCiv.iib.12. ftanding in Grace. It is St. Avftivs obfervation, That the Angels who flood, were ampli.vs adjttti , more helped than thole who fell 5 therefore they cafldown their Crowns before God, afcribing their (landing, not to themfelves, but to Grace. Should they do 5 what they cannot do, afcribe it to themfelvcs, they could not be thankful. In like manner holy men who perfevere, attribute nothing to themfelvcs, but AdCtefcaj\3 a jj to Grace 5 ^uodcunq^ in fuo rivirto fluit, as St. Jcrom fpeaks, ad fontem refert, Whatever flows in his rivulet, he refers to the great fountain; that he faul- ters Of GRACE. a g 7 tersand lapfes, is of his own 5 that he Hands and Chap. 10, perfeveres, is of Grace. Were it not fo, the praife and glory fhould be afcribed not to God, but to our " felves, which would be to turn Gratitude into Pre- fumption. The Graces of the Saints may be confidered in the a£r, or in the habit. The ails havq their too fre- quent paufes and interruptions $ but the habit, the vital principle, is a iced of immortality, and never dyes. In the faddeft falls of a Saint, it may befaid of him as it was of Eutychtts, Hfc life k in him. He that is born of God, doth not commit \iv 5 nay, he cannot fin, 1 Job. 3. 9. Doubt lefs he can fin fins of infirmi- ty 5 nay, and grofs fins too, as appears in the falls of David and Peter 5 but he cannot fin (b as totally to • unframe the new-creature, and lay himfelf in an un- regenerate ftate. This is clear by the reafons in the Text, For his feed remaincth in him, and he is horn of God. Could he by Cm extinguifh the very principles of Grace, he might fin to all intents and purpofes, contrary to the exprels letter of the text $ nay, and his feed might not remain, and he might ceafe to be born of God, contrary to the reafons in the text. If the Divine feed -and birth do not prefcrve him from regnant fin, fuch as would overthrow him, it pre- ferves him from no fin at all :> the text and reafon are altogether infignificant. But if, as the text and truth is, it preferves him from regnant fin, then the Divine Principles are not extinguished when he falh into fin. *^W The habits of Grace maTbe confidered meerly in therrielves, or in their dependence. In thcmfelvcc thev • ^§ Of GRACE. Chap, i o. they are but defe&ible creatures, and might total- ly fail:, their being is not from themfelves, no more is their duration 5 in their dependance they cannot poffibly fail , becaufe they are fupported by fome- what greater than themfelves. Remarkable is the dif- ference between the cafe of Adam and that of belie- vers 5 in Adam, one aft of fin expelled perfeft lEioli- nefs} fo that upon the fall, there was not left in him To much as the leaft relick of fan&ity, or fpark of fpiritual life: he, and after him, all his pofterity be- came fpiritually dead in fin, not in part only} for then the new-creature fhould be new but in part ^ but totally, every thing in fallen man wants quick- ening. But in believers, not one, not many fins are able to drive out the principles of Grace , though thofe principles are imperfeft in themfelves , and dwell together with much inherent corruption, yet are they not driven out : and the reafon of this .difference is, Adam had the flock of holinefs in his own hands 3 but the graces of the believers depend upon fbmewhat greater than themfelves. Now touching this Dependence, I (hall lay down three or four things: 1. The Graces of Saints depend upon Eleftion, though Ele&ion be in it felf from all eternity, yet it buds and bloffoms in time. He hath blejjed us with all fpiritual blej/ings in heavenly places inChriji: According as he hath chofen us in him^ Eph. 1. 3, 4. Divine Graces, which are choice fpiritual blefiings, ifiiie not out of common providence 5 but, as St. Bernard fpeaks, ex abyjjo their Graces llull not fail, becaufe his Truth and Faithfulnefs can- not a 294 Of G R A C E. Chap. ic. not} their (landing is lure, becaufe his promifcs can- not fall to the ground. To add no more : We fee here how we ought in all humility to give Grace its due 5 and this we can- not do, unlefs we give it all. Non eft devotionk de- cline prope totum Deo 7 fed fraudis retimiijje vel mini- mum, faith Pro/per : To give Nine hundred ninety nine parts to Grace, and referve one only to mans will, is more than true devotion will bear : it's juft to give the whole unto God. The Jcnifi Rabbins fay, That he who receives any good thing in this world without a benediction, is a robber of God : but the greateft facriledg of all is, when we own not the Grace of God in fupernatural bleflings which re- late to the world to come} Vere bunnies totum Deo redduvt , True humble fouls render all to God. Let us then acknowledg with Jacob , We are lefs tha?i the kajl of all his mercies. We were naturally undone, unclean creatures, proper objefts of wrath. Why did God fend his Son in the flefti to leek that which was loft, wafh us in a lavcr of his own blood , and bring us into favour with him? We might have been born in the dark places of the earth where Chrift is not named, where the Sun of Righteoufnefs fhines not in Pardons and Graces. Why did God place us in a Region of Evangelical light, and fet Jefus Chrift with all his beauties and treafures evidently before us? Un- der the Gofpel there are many blind eyes and hard hearts, many poor fouls dead and buried in a grave of fin. Why did he open our eyes upon heavenly my- fteries, and melt our hearts into the Divine will? Why did he raife us up out of our fpiritual graves, and * Of G K AC E. 2p$ and quicken us unto a Divine life > There is (Yill cor- Chop, to, ruption within, and temptation without us. Our Gra- ces are weak, and in themflvcs defedfible creatures. Why doth he fupply us witnfrefti influences of grace, and maintain the new-creature in us ? Why are we not fwallowed up in temptations and corruptions,but kept and preferred to the heavenly Kingdom ? Here we muft glory in our Cod, and cry out , Grace, Grace. All the good we have, is from that Fountain. Thus St. Paul afcribes all to Grace} I live , yet not /, but Chrift hveth in me. I labour, yet not 7, but the grace of God which was with me. He acknow* ledges no I-nefs, but afcribes all hisfpiritual being and working to Grace. I will (hut up all with that of Bonaventure , Furti reus eft, qui fibi aliquid rcti- vet, cum Dcus clicat, gloriam meant alteri non dabo 5 He is guilty of Theft, who retains any thing to him- felf, when God hath faid, My glory I will not give, to another. All glory therefore be to him alone. CHAP. Chap. 1 1. CHAP. XI. Touching Juftification^ to the Law. Chrift'j- Righte- oufnefi con/lit utes us Righteous. A double imputation: One to the proper Agent ^ another to thofe in Con- junction; the Conjunctions between Chrift and us ; how Chrift'i* Righteoufnefi is imputed to us ; that it js not only the Meritorious^ but Material cauje of our J uftifi 'cation ; this is proved from that phrafe^ The Righteoufnefs of God ; from the nature of Ju- ftification; from the parallel of the two Adams ;from other phrafes in Scripture ; from a pardon as not he" ing the fame with Juftification ; from Chrift.' sfuf- fering in our Jlead; the Objections again ft imputed Righteoufnefi anfwe red; what juftifies us as to the Gofipel terms ; the NeceJJity and connexion of a two- fold Righteoufnefi ; how we are juftified by Faith ; how Good Works are necejjary. A fhortConclufion. THERE remaineth yet behind one Eminent piece of Grace • I mean Juftification ; this in Luther is, Articulus ft ant is & cadentis Ecclefia?^ and in Chemnitius^ Arx & propugnaculum Religionis Chriftianae ; a Sacred thing it is, and difficult to ex- plain ; the • true meafures of it cannot be taken from any thing but the holy Scripture, where this My- ftery is revealed. Touching Juftification there are three things confiderabk, viz. Firft we are confti- tuted righteous ; then efteemed or pronounced fuch ; and at [aft treated as fuch. The firft conferrs a righteoufnefs upon us ; the fecond ownes and declares it ; the third gives us the confequent reward thereof T t The 326 Chrift'/ Righteoufnefs Chap. 1 1 . The firft we have in that phraie of Juftifying the Un- godly, Rom. 4. y; for that, unlefs it were collative of a Righteoufnefs, would be the fame abomination with the Juftifying the Wicked, Troy. 17. if. The fccond in that phrafe of Juftifying the Righteous,. Deut.z<$. 1. where the word ( Juftifying ) is not ef~- fettionis , fed ceftimationis © declaratioms fignificati- vum : the third is not fo much a part of Justification, as a confequent of it ; neither do I remember that it is called Juftification in Scripture : The firft is the foundation of the other two ; unlefs a Man be con- flicted righteous, God, who is Truth it felf, can- not efteem or pronounce him fuch : for that were for him to err, which is impoffible ; neither can he, who is Sanctity it felf, treat him as fuch ; for an unrighte- ous Perfon cannot poffibly enter into the holy Hea- ven, where Eternal Life is given to the Righteous. The msxnQuare in Juftification is, What it is that conftitutes us righteous before God : Righteoufnefs relates to fome Law : we are under a double Law r - v the one the Law of Nature or Creation, which calls for perfect Obedience in every point. The other the Law of Grace, which accepts of fincerity ; we muft, if juftified, be made righteous to both thefe, accordingly I lhall difcourfe of' both. We are under the Moral Law of Nature ; this is immortalized by its own intrinfecal rectitude ,• it fo naturally refults out of the Relation which Man Hands in towards God, that as long as God is God, die Supream Truth and Goodnefs, and Man Man, a Creature endued with Reafon and Will, it cannot r.eafe to be,or to oblige : it is not imaginable, that iuch a thing as Reafon fhould be unbound to look up to the original Truth, from whence it came, or that ftich Imputed to us. 327 fuch a thing as Free-will, ihould be unbound to em- Chap. n. brace that infinite Good which made it; this Law Hands fafter than the pillars of Heaven and Earth: it hath a double Sanction ; a promife of Eternal Life upon perfect obedience, and a threatning of eternal Death upon the lead Tranfgreflion. The promife though never abrogated by God, could not of it felf bud or bring forth Life ; a Sinner,becaufe a Sinner, not being capable of perfect obedience, could not have Life from that promife, ceffat materia. There could be no perfon capable of the promifed Life ; the Law was weak, though not in it felf, yet through the Flefli, the fin of Man. Man finned away the Promife, but the Threatning he could not fin away ; nay, by his fin he put himfelf under the Curfe and Wrath of it. Sin made him a fit object and fuel for thefe ; the cafe {landing thus, how or which way ihould a Sinner be juflified as to the Law ? In a Sinner there was matter enough for the Treatning , but more for the Promife. Death might juftly feize him, but Life he was not payable of by vertue of that Law ; here infinite Wifdom found out that which no created Eye could fpy out, a. way of Juftification without abrogating the LaW : thus therefore it was contrived, the Law, being under the power of the Legiflator, was relaxed, though not abrogated ,• there may be a double notion of the Law ; either it may be taken as it is in it felf, in fummo apice , in its primordial rigor, requiring perfect perfonal obedience from us; and thus it doth not, cannot juftifie us ,• there is a T^'JWaTOK, an utter impoffibility upon it. Rom. 8. j. Righteouihefs could not come by the Law, nay, in his fenfe it worketh wrath, it condemns and curies the Sinner,- or eife it may be taken as it is bv the great Tt 2 Le- 5^8 ChriftV Rigbteoufnefs Chap. 1 1. Lcgiflator relaxed, to admit of a fatisfadtion in our V^y"^ Sponfor Jefus Chrifl ; and thus it hath its end, its but furely they thought there was fomewhat more in it : For my own part,I conceive C7;Avy?'sRighteoufnefs is fo far imputed to us, as to.be the matter of our Ju- ftification ; before I come to offer my Reafons, I fhall lay down feveral things tending to explain my mean- ing in this point, Firft, There is a double Imputation. The one,when a thing inherent or tranfient is imputed to the very Subject or Agent of it, The other, when it is im- puted to thofe in conjunction with the Subject or Agent, as being parts and portions of him. The firft Imputation is according to the courfe of Nature, the fecond is according to fomc juit confutation made touching the fame ; the former is uniuefcionable, the 3 30 ChnftV Righteoufnefs Chap. 1 1. the latter is that which is to be cleared, that fuch an Imputation is poffible ; and when it is done, truth may appear by thefe Inftances. The primitive Right- eoufnefs of our Nature was only inherent in Adam : Yet was it imputed to us ; we were by God efteemed as righteous in him, elfe we &re not fallen Creatures, neither do we need any fuch thing as Regeneration. Adams fin w^as an act done by him, yet is it impu- ted to us ; it is derived down upon us as Members of him, elfe the want of Righteoufnefs in us is not a privative want of what we once had in Adam, and afterwards loft in him, but a meer negative want, as being only of that we never had or forfeited : Adams Righteoufnefs being not imputed to us, we never had it; Adams fin being not imputed to us, we ne- ver forfeited it; fuch a meer negative want is no fin. Nay, if Adams fin be not imputed to us, our inhe- rent pravity is no fin ; it cannot be fin in unfallen Creatures ; it is no fin to be born into the World ; there is no foundation in us to make it fin; and the confequence of this is, that there is no fuch thing as original fin at all in us, which to fay, is to op- pofe the Doctrine of the Church in all Ages : We lee here, that fuch an imputation to thofe in con- junction is poffible, becaufe it is actually done ; and it muft needs be true,becaufe it is done by God,who is Truth it felf,and cannot err. You will fay, It cannot be true, primitive Righteoufnefs was never in us, we never committed Adams fin : I anfwer, This is one thing which over-turns Religion ; we are apt to re- ject that as falfe,which our weakReafon cannot com- prehend. Is not an internal fin in the Will imputed to the Members of the Body ? if not,why mult the Body rife and fuffer for it ? if fo, fin may be imputed to Imputed to us to that which it never refidedin; in this cafe the Chap. u. conjunction falves the matter ; and by a parity of^-^Vv^ Reafon, Adams Righteoufnefs and Sin may be im- puted to us, as being parts and Members of him ; and the Imputation is true, becaufe it is to thofe in conjunction, and according to a juft conftitution. God fet Adam to be a Head of Mankind; we are pro- pagated from him as Brashes from the Root ; his fin therefore may be juftly imputed to us: the Im- putation of it is according to the Divine Conftitu- tion : But the reafon of that Imputation is, becaufe Adam j the Head of Mankind, finned, and all in him : It is a pretty queftion which is ftarted in Anfelm^ De Concept-, how the Senfes and Members in Man Ihould be guilty Virg.ca}./^. of fin, when God- himfelf fubjected them to Man's Will ? I anfwer, God's order was meet and congru- ous in fo fubjefting them ; yet the a£t of the Will renders them guilty, as being in conjunction with it : in like manner, God's Conftitution that Adam ihould be the Head of Mankind, was juft and equitable, but this tranfgreffion of Adam derives a guilt upon us, as being parts and Members of him. ily. The Conjunction between Chrift and us mult be confidered, and that is double. The one is that Conjunction which is between Chrift and Mankind in common ; the Titles given to Chrift will manifeft it; he is a Mediator, not only an internuntial one, but a fatisfying and atoning one, a Mediator above all Peer or Parallel, and that in all his Offices, in which he a£ted not as a private Per- fon, or in his own name only, But, as the Office was in Gods or ours ; in his Prophetical and Kingly Offi- ces he afted in God's Name towards usj in his Prieft- iy Office, he adted in our Name towards God ; hence ■ the ^i ChrilVi" 7(ightconfnefs oy Chap. ii. the Apoftle faith, that every Prieft is "ordained -^k JvSfUTTM, for Men , Heb. y. i. to aft in their behalf towards God : he was our Sponfor or Surety, he un- dertook to fatisfie Juftice for us. Loe, I come to do thy '»iU % God \ faith he , Heb. 10. 7. Burnt-offerings and Sacrifices could not pay our Debts, but he would do it ; and for that purpofe he took an Humane Na- ture to do it in : never was there fuch a Surety as he; he undertook to fatisfie for us, not as common Sure- ties do, upon a meer contingency, but upon a certain determinate Counfel ; not when we were folvents or able to reimburfe him again, but when we were Tmown utter bankrupts, under a perfect impofiibility to expiate the lead fin. So plenary was that fatisfa- ftion, that if we receive him by Faith, we are Deb- tors no longer, all our debts are blotted out of God's Book, no more to be charged upon us; a fecond pay- ment cannot be demanded of us ; he was the reprefen- tative of Mankind. Ht did fufl mere noftram perfonam, he flood in our room ; hefuffered in our ftead,not on- ly nofiro bono, but noftro loco : it may be thought per- haps that Chrifl was not a proper fubftitute ; but it was well faid by the Learned Rivet in another cafe, Regulis & Legibus human is Deum alllgare vult pulvis ® elms: We are apt to limit the Holy one to our Rules and meafures : But if the Myfteries of chrift may be put into the flraights of humane Laws and Rea- ibn, he can fcarce be properly any thing of that which the Scripture afcribes to him, he cannot pro- perly be a Surety and a Mediator too , much lefs a Prieft and a Sacrifice too ; lead of all thefe, and a Redeemer too in the lame fufferings : A Mediator dotli not pay as a Surety doth ; nor a Surety offer as .a Prieit doth; nor a Prieft die as a Sacrifice doth; nei- Imputed to us. 333 neither is a Redeemer the very fame with thefe, but Chap. 1 1 -diitinft from them all ; may there be a proper Prieit and Redeemer, a proper Offering and Paying, a pro- per Sacrifice and Price in the fame fufferings : thefe conjunctions feem to carry difficulty in them. Ne- verthelefs, I verily believe, that he was properly all thefe, yet in a way of tranfeendency above humane Law and Reafon 5 it is obfervable in Scripture, that one notion of Chrift runs into another, the notion of a Mediator into that of a Redeemer; he is a Media- tor, who gave kimfelf a ranfom , 1 Tim. 2. j, & 6. the notion of a Mediator into that of a Prieit, he is a Mediator for the Redemption of Tranfgreffwns , He b. 9. iy. that is, for the expiation of them by offering up himfelf to God, as it is in the precedent verfe; the notion of a Prieit into that of a Surety: hence in the midlt of a Divine Difcourfe touching his Prieft- hood, comes in iyyv®- fi*dnw<, the furety of the Cove- nant, Heb. 7.22. nay, it is obfervable , that thefe notions of Chrilt are interwoven with that of a Sub- Ititute, as the mode of performing them. Thus as a Prieit he gave himfelf an Offering and a Sacrifice for us, Ephef. j. 2. as a Redeemer he was made a Curfe for us, Gal. 2. 1 j. as a Mediator and Redeemer he gave himfelf a ranfom for all, 1 Tim. 2. j, & 6. in each of which the fubftitution comes in : hence it appears, that Chrift is properly all thefe; or elfe , as Socinus would have it, all feems to be but a Metaphor. To add no more , thefe Conjunctions tell us , that Chrilt was fo far one with us, that thofe things fell upon him, which otherwife he was utterly incapable of The Holy One was made fin, the Bleffed One a curfe ; his fufferings were properly penal , fuch as were not inflicted by Soveraignty, but Juitice , fuch Uu as 334 ChriftV Rigbteoufnefs as were not the Curfe cauflefs, but merited by Cm; un- lefs they were merited by fin, they were meer fufier- ing, not punifhment ; puniihment for nothing , is no punilliment : if there was no puniihment in his iuflerings, how were they fatisfactory ? If there was no merit of fin to procure them, how were they pe- nal ? If Juftice inflicted them not, how were they a puniihment ? or, if they were penal, how could Ju- ftice inflift them upon an Innocent ? Here we have nothing to fay, but this, Chrift was fo far made one with us, as to render his fufferings penal and fatis- factory. The other is that fpecial conjunftion, which is be- tween Chrift and Believers ; Chrijt is the Head, they are the Members : the Ligatures of this Myftical U- nion are the Holy Spirit and Faith, the quickning Spi- rit (faith the reverend Vfher) defends downwards from the head to be in us a fountain of fupernatural life ; a lively Faith, wrought by the fame Spirit , a- fcends from us upward to lay faft hold upon him. The Scripture notably fets forth this Union y We dwell in Chrift, and he in us , John 6. 56. We abide in him^ and he in j^r, John 1 5. 4. We are Members of his Bo- dy, of his Fit 'fh, and of his Bones , Ephef. 5. 30, 32. And he is in us the hope of Glory, Col. 1. 27. This the Apoftle calls agreatMyftery, and the Riches of the Glory of the Myftery ; we are ingrafted into him as Branches into a Root ; cemented to him as the building is to the foundation ; incorporated with him as the ibod is with our Bodies ; united to him as Members are to the Head. We cat his Fleih, and drink his Blood, and become one Spirit with him; nothing c^n be more emphatical , the Holy Spirit, wliich refides in him.the Head ? falls down upon us his Imputed to us. 335 his Members, and fo makes a kind of continuity be- Chap. n. tween him and us, too Spiritual and Divine to be in- ^-^V"^ terrupted by any local diftance : Hence St. Chry* Co ^ T CoYt Joftom faith, that there is , *»Af pwtr, no medium or ^ x u middle between Chrift and us ; hence St. Auftin faith, that, hideles jiunt emit homine Chriffo unus De ^ cn ' Chrift us, Believers are made one Christ with the Man er,c ^'' Chrift, the Head and the Body make up one Chrift: Hence that of Aquinas, that Chrift and his Members are but, un a perjona myftica, one myftical per/on ; the confequence of this admirable Union is the commu- nication of Divine Bleffings from him to us, tot a vera juftitia, falutis, vita participatio ex hac perne- ceftaria cum Chrifto mivwU pendet : faith the learn- ed 2 anchy, All our good things depends on this moft necejjary Vnion. Thirdly, The righteoufnefs of Chrift may be ta- ken under a double notion, either as it was the very idem to all the Laws he was under, or elfe as it was the tantundem , a plenary fatisfaction to the moral Law by us violated; in the firft notion it was a righte- oufnefs ex natura jua, being a perfect conformity to thofe Laws; in the fecond it was a fatisfaction ex di~ vina ordinatione,be'mgby God ordained fo to be ; in the firft notion it was not for us ; who , being once Turners, were incapable of it. But for himfelf to juftifie and fanftifie him in that ftate , which he un- dertook to be in : In the fecond it was not for him- felf; who, as being pure from all fin, was incapable of it; but for us, to juftifie us finners againit the Law: Here I ihall only add, that, under the notion of fatisfaftion, I take in all ChrifVs righteoufnefs, Aftive-as well as Paftive ; though I think the Active in it feif alone could not have amounted to a fatis- Uui faction, 3 3 6 ChriftV Righteouffiefs Chap. ii. faction , becaufe without fhedding of blood there ^*sy~\y was no remiflionto be; yet the Active being in Con- junction with the Paffive, is a part of the fatisfaction, and makes it the more compleat ,• for a fatisfaction made up of both together , anfwers the threatning, and honours the precept of the Law ; it fatisfies God's Juftice in it felf by penal fufferings, and in its foundation, that is, God's holinefs, by perfect obedience. Fourthly, The Active and Paffive Righteoufnefs of Chriil are not imputed to us,as they are the Idem, a perfect conformity to the Laws he was under ; for we were not under the Mediatorial Law: nor, be* ing once finners, are we capable of a perfect confor- mity to the moral : but they are imputed to us , as they are the tantundem, a plenary fatisfaction to the moral Law by us broken; lor fo they are very apt and proper to juftifie finners againft the Law : Neither is Chrift's fatisfaction imputed to all actually to juftifie them againft the Law , for all are not juftified a- gainft it, but it is imputed to Believers , as being myftical parts and portions of him : hence that Dav, de Learned Bifliop faith ,Quia infill fumus in corpus ejus ^ Juft, hak coalefcimus cum illo in unam perfonam, ideo ejus juflitia 3 6 -9- nojtra reputarurjoeczute we are ingrafted into his bo- dy, and grow as it were , into one Perfon with him, therefore his Righteoufnefs is reputed ours ; neither is Chrift's fatisfaction imputed to his believing Mem- bers according to its fulnefs and latitude as it is irr Ghrift the Head, but in fuch fort and meafure as is meet for itto be communicated to Members: this is notably iiluftrated in the parallel of the two Adams, who are two fuch communicative Heads, as never were the like, who communicate to theirs in fuch propor- Imputed to m. 337 proportion as is congruous between Head and Mem- Chap, u bets. Adam's fin is derived to each of us, not in its ^HTN^- full latitude , but pro menfura membri ; and in like manner, Chrift's fatisfa&ion is derived to each Be- liever, not in its full latitude, but pro rnenfura membri; fo much of Adams fin comes upon each one of us, as foon as he is proles Ada? y as makes him a finner,* fo much of Chrift's fatisfaction comes upon each one of us, as foon as he is proles Chrifti , as makes him Righteous againft the Law ; in both there is a communication to Members , yet in fuch a way, as that the difference between Head and Members is obferved. Fifthly, There was a Divine Conftitution , that Je~- fus Chrift ihould be ourSponfor, and {landing in our room, ihould fatisfie for us,. that he ihould be an Head to Believers, and his fatisfaction ihould fo far be- come theirs, as to juftifie them againft the Law : ac- cordingly that fatisfaction is truly imputed to them. Some Perfons have been pleafed to fpeak of Imputed Righteoufnefs, as if it were a fancy, a meer putative imaginary thing; but we fee here upon what grounds it Hands: the firft Foundation of it , is the Divine conftitution made touching Chrifl$ the intermediate Foundation is this, that Chrift was our Sponfor and fatisfied for us : the immediate Foundation is this, that Chrift is a communicating Head to his believing . Members, and they as Members participate in his fa- tisfaction; thefe things are fufficientto make us con- elude as Biihop Davenant doth, Imputatio non nititur fittitia aliquaj'uppojitione^ fed vera partkipntiane ni imputatce. : Imputation doth not ft and upon any fill hi- - ous juppofition, but upon a true part ici pat. on of the thing imputed. Thefe things being thus laid down, I 338 ChriftV Right eonfmfs Chap. 11. {hall come direftly to the point, my Opinion is, That the Righteoufnefs of Chrijl is not meerly the meritorious caufe of Juftification,but fomwhat more ; neither is it meerly imputed to us in the Effects, but it felf, as a fatisfafrion, is fo far imputed to us, as t:) be the material caufe of Juftification, as to the Law, I think nothing can be more proper to juftifie us as the Law than that which fatisfied it. I cannot tell how to fuppofe that one thing fliould fatisfie the Law, and another juftifie againft it : And here I ihall firft lay down my Reafons , and then anfwer the Obje- ctions made againft my Opinion : For Reafcns I fhall offer feveral things. Firft, I ihall begin with that memorable phrafe, The Righteoufnefs of God, which cannot but be of great moment in this point : fome take it for the mercy of God , and fo it is fometimes taken in the Old Teftament, The Mercy of the Lord is up- on them that fear him, and his Righteoufnefs unto Children s Children, PfaL 103. 17. where Mercy and Righteoufnefs are one and the fame ; but in the New Teftament, where this phrafe often occurs, it is ne- ver fo taken; the Righteoufnefs of God is revealed in the Gofpel, Rom. 1. 17. Revealed, that, which be- fore was only obfcurely hinted, was in the Gofpel clearly opened ; but the Mercy of God was not only darkly hinted, but openly proclaimed in very high and ftately terms in the Old Teftament. An Inftance we have of it, Exod. 34. 6, and 7. where the Titles of Mercy carry as much of Glory and Magnificence as any thing can do. We are faid to be made the Righteoufnels of God, zCor.^.zi. but never to be made his Mercy; neither would be at all proper to fay fo. Others take it for our Inherent Graces, which are Imputed to m. 33^ are our Evangelical Righteoufneis ; but thefe,though Chap.'i 1, they comedown from Heaven, are never called the ' Righteoufnefs ; nay, on the contrary they are called our own, as being inherent in us: Hence we fin J Your Faith, Rom.i.S. your Love, 2 Cor. 8.8. your Patience, Luke 21. 19. your Hope, 1 Pet. 1. 21. your Righteoufnefs, Matth. j. 20. that, which in Scripture is called the Righteoufnefs of God, is not the fame with that which is called our own there,- were our Inherent Graces imported in that phrafe, Faith, which is a prime excellent Grace, mult have its fliare therein ; but the Righteoufnefs of God is by Faith, Rom.^.zz. Therefore it is not Faith,, the Righteoufnefs of God is upon the Believer, there- fore it is not in him : Others take it for Pardon ; but neither can this Interpretation ftand. The Jews were ignorant of God's Righteoufnefs, Row. 10. j<, but furely they were not ignorant, that God was a God pardoning iniquity, that Pardon which in the Old Teftament is elegantly decyphered by Cover- ing, Blotting out, Remembring no more, Cafiing away fin, is not in the New vailed in an Exprefii- on, fo obfeure and improper for it, as that of the Righteoufnefs of God feems to be to that intent- leaving thefe, I rake it, that the Righteoufnefs of God imports that of Chrifl ; and in tins fence the phrafe is as Glorious and Illuftrious, as it would be obfeure and improper to denote Pardon : The Righteoufnefs of Chr'ijl is indeed the Righteoufnefs of God ; it is the Righteoufnefs of him who is God,ofhim,whofeBiood is called the Blood of God; it is a pure perfcctRighte- oufnefs which can confift before the Tribunal of God > which was by God ordained to make us Righteous : Tliis is it whichjbeing before but darkly hinted,was in the 540 ChrilVj Righteoufnefs Chap. ii. the Gofpel manifeftly revealed ; this is that which is upon the Believer as £ rich Covering to hide his im- perfections, this is it which the Jews were ignorant •of, and fubmitted not unto : the Apoftle tells us,That they fubmitted not to the Righteoufnefs of God, Rom. 10. 3. and what that Righteoufnefs is, the next Verfc exprelTes ; for Chrift is the end of the Law for Right- eoufnefs to every one that believeth; the Law hath its -end in nothing but in his Righteoufnefs, which fa- tisfied it. But befides there is one place, which in terminis calls theRighteoufnefs of God theRighteouf- ■mfs of Chrift, to them who have obtained like preci- ous Faith with -us through the Righteoufnefs ot God and our Saviour Jefus Chrift,z Pet. 1.1. Obferve, it is not through the Righteoufnefs tS 0s?, $ t* 2*™?©-, of God, and of our Saviour Jefus Chrift, as noting two Perfons, but t£ ee«, x) s^™?©-, of God and our Saviour, as betokening one, as Biihop Downham hath obferved; Jike that Tit. 2. 13. The glorious Appearance of the great God and our Saviour, where one Perfon is in- tended : Thus far it appears, that the Righteoufiiefs -of God denotes the Righteoufnefs of Chrift. That which remains is to enquire, Whether the Righte- oufnefs of God never import any more than a meer meritorious caufe : 'Tis true in that place 2 Pet.i. 1. it imports no more ; but in others it (peaks further : We are made the Righteoufnefs of God, 2 Cor. 5% 21. The Righteoufnefs of God is upon us, Rom. 3. 22. and, as a paraphrafe upon the Righteoufnefs of God , the Apoltle tells us, that Chrift is the end of the Law for Righteoufnefs to the Believer, Rom. 10.4. Here I take it, the Righteoufnefs of Chrift is fet forth not only as a meritorious antecedent caufe of Juitifi- xation,but as an Ingredient, a material caufe in it : lie that Imputed to us. 34.1 that hath only the effect, cannot be faid to be made Chap. 1 the Impetrating caufe, no more can we be faid to be made the Righteoufnefs of 67;/*///, if we only have the fruit of it, not the thing it felf: That Righte- oufnefs, as a meritorious caufe, may be faid to be for us ; but not to be upon us, unlcls by Imputation it be made ours : Chrift in refpect of Merit only is ne more for Righteoufnefs ( which yet is the Emphails of the Text) than for ianrtifying Graces, thefe being as much merited as the other ; Chrift is lb far Right- eoufnefs as he is the end of the Law, and that he is in the fatisfadtion it felf, not in Remifiion, which is the effect of it; the Satisfaction it felf therefore is made ours in Juftification. It feems to me a great depar- ture from the Text to fay , Chrift is the end of the Law for Righteoufnefs, that is for Pardon , which is the Effedt,. or for Impunity, which is the Effect of the Effect. Secondly, It is utterly impoffible that there fhould be a Juftification without a Righteoufnefs. Con- ftitutive Juftification makes us Righteous, Eftima- tive or fentential Juftification efteems or pronounces us fuch ; a Juftification cannot be without a Right- eoufnefs ,• nor can any thing be a Righteoufnefs, un- lefs it anfvver the Law. What then is our Righte- oufnefs as to the Law ? Faith, anfwers the Gofpei terms : But what anfwers the Law ? Surely nothing under Heaven can do it but Chrift's Satisfadtion. The Quxre therefore is, Whether that Satisfaction be our Righteoufnefs in it felf, or only in its effects : if in the effects only, then fomething lefs than Chrift's fatisfaction, viz. an effect, is our Righteouf- nefs as to the Law, and by confequence fomething Jefs than that fatisfies the Law : I cannot imagine Xx that ChriftV Rigbtcoufnefs Chap, 1 1. that one thing ihould fatisfie the Law, and another juftifie againit it ; one and the fame fatisfaftion of Chrift doth both. There are but two forts of Right- eoufnefs as to the Law; the one a Righteoufnels in the ideMy a direft conformity to it ; the other aRight- eoufnefs in valor, a fall compenfation or fatisfaftion for the breaches of it, a third cannot be found,where there is neither fuch a conformity to the Law, that all is done as it ought to be, nor fuch a fatisfaftion to it, that all that is done amifs, is compenfated, there is no fuch thing as Righteoufnefs , a pardon or freedom from puniihment there maty be, but a Right- eoufnefs there is not. Becaufe there is nothing done to the Law; either by way of obedience or recom- pence ; and where nothing is done to the Law, there cannot be a Righteoufnefs : Now a Sinner not be- ing capable of a Righteoufnefs of conformity, his Righteoufnefs mull be that of a fatisfaftion or com- penfation ; not an effeft of it, but the thing it felf, no other thing can be a Sinners Righteoufnefs. It is obfervable in Scripture, That Juftification is fo fet forth, that the Law is eftabliihed in it, Rom. J. 31; that its Righteoufnefs is fulfilled, Rom. 8. 4. that it hath its end, Rom. 10. 4. And all this becaufe in Chrift's Satisfaction there is a foil compenfation made for fin, fuch as comes in the room of a perfeft conformity, and fupplies that defeft of it which rife out of the fault committed : This is done by the Satisfaction it felf,not by an effect of it. Nothing lefs than it felf could give the Law its end or eftablifh- ment : If that Satisfaction be our Righteoufnefs,not in it felf but in its effects, what is that effect ? Is it a Pardon ? that is God's aft ; God's aft may make or cfteem us righteous, but it is not the Righteouf- nefs Imputed to us. 242 nefs it fell; it is a jus impunitatis that is not the Right- Chap. 1 r eoufnefs it felf; a Righteouihefs as to the Law mult be either a perfect conformity or a fatisiaction, but a Jus impunitatis is neither of thefe ; as in Condem- nation the Obliqatio ad pcenam is not the very culpa, but a confequent ol it. So in Juftification the Jus impunitatis is not the very Righteouihefs, but a confequent of it. A Jus impunitatis is oppo- fite to the re at us pang ; but a Satisfaction, which is our true Righteoufnefs, is oppofite to the reatus cul- pa?, as compenfating the fault committed. It remains therefore that Chnlt's Satisfaction is not in its effects, but in it felf our Righteoufnefs, which alfo further appears: In that, when we are to anfwer for our breaches of the Law, our great Plea is to that no other than his Satisfaction ,• OJlendofdejuJforem me- Dejufi.hak urn, faith Bilhop Davenant, When the Law makes its 3 70. demands againft me, I ihew my Sponfor Chrift, who fatisfied it. Now, if his Satisfaction be it felf our Righteoufnefs, it muft be made ours by Imputa- tion, for that which is not ours, cannot be our Right- eoufnefs; neither doth God, who judgeth according to Truth, efteem it fach : You will fay, Though it felf be not ours, yet it is that for which God dorh juftifie us : To which I anfwer, Though God juftifie us for it, yet, unlefs it be ours, it is no more our Righteoufnefs than it is our Holinefs ; when God fanctifies us for it, no Man (I think) will call it our Holinefs, no more, unlefs it be ours, may we call it our Righteoufnefs. If it be ours by Imputation, then it is more than a meritorious caufe. It is the very matter of our Juftification ; neither can I tell how to think it lefs, feeing a Sinner is capable of no other Righteoufnefs, as to the Law, but a Satisfacti- Xx 2 on. 544 ChrillV Righteoufnefs Chap. 11. on, feeing ib glorious a Satisfaction, as that of Chrift is, is ufhered into the World for that very end ; it is to me unimaginable , that that Satisfaction ihould yet not be our Righteoufnefs as to the Law, but fome- thing lefs than it felf ihould have the honour of it. Thirdly, Very momentous in this point, is the collation of the two Adams, Rom. 5. the firft Adam was the Origen of Sin; Chrift the fecond Adam, was theOrigenof Righteoufnefs and Life : never were there in the World two fiich Heads as thefe, uterque quod fuum efl cum fuis communicat , as the Learned Beza hath it, Adam communicates Sin and Death to his Pofterity ; Chrifts Righteoufnefs and Life to his believing Seed, in the parallel it is obfervable , that Ghrift is as ftrong ; nay ,..a ftronger Head than Adam, Adam was iiv& a Type of him that was to come; and lefs then the Antitype, who, was more potent to re- build the ruines of the fall, than Adam was to make them, Righteoufnefs came as full from Chrift , as fin did from Adam ; nay , more fully, as the Apoftle hints in the jtdv^^^ok, verfe. 15. and in the abund- ance and fuperabundance of Grace, verf. 17. & 2c. hence it appears, that fo far as Adam's fin was ours, fo far is Chrifl's Righteoufnefs ours alfo. Adams fin was not ours in the fulllatitude,as it wasinhim,we did not eat the Fruit in our own perfons , we were not heads of Mankind, we did not uiher in Sin and Death upon the World, no, this was, A 9 '«V9-,by that one A- dam, neither was it ours in the effect only,for then our innate pravity would be no fin, as meerly proceeding irom that firft (mo? Adam, in which we participated not : that in the Schools muit needs be true, peccatum ituale dkit ejfent/alem ord'inem ad prcccedens atlua- /e ; Its impojfible, that one Ihould he a fumer habitually, n ho in no Jenfe was a /inner before : hence that of St. Attftin Imputed to us. oa^ A ujl/n, quoted by Dr. Ward, Nulla foret homtnis culpa, Chap, i j Ji talis a Deo Creatus effet, qualts nunc najcitur, it re- mains therefore that Adams fin it felf is derived to each one of us, pro ration? membri, proportionally: Chrift's fatisfafcion is not ours in the full latitude, as it was in him ; we fatisfied not God's Juflice in our own Perfons, we were not Heads of the Church, nei- ther did weulherin Life and Righteoufnefs into the. World ; no,.it was «f/ h& , by that one Chrift,neither is it ours in the effect only ; for then the effect a thing lcfs than the iatisfadtion it felf, fliould juftifie or make us righteous againft the Law, which cannot, be : It remains therefore that it is it felf derived upon each one of us , pro menjura membri : Again 5 Adams fin did firfh in order of Nature, make us fih- ners by it felf imputed , and then by the inherent- pravity confequent ; in like manner ChrilVs fatif- taction doth firft in order of Nature make us righte- ous by it felf imputed, and then by the fmctitying Graces communicated by vertue of it : Now if Chrifts fatisfadtion be not it felf communicated to us as Members of him ; then the Glory of his Headfhip feems to fail, he is not fo ftrong an Head as Adam, Righteoufnefs is not fo amply communicated from Chrilt,as finis fromAdam^Adam communicates die fin it felf to us , but Chrill communicates his Righteoufnefs in the effects only ; if Chrilt only me- rited Juftification, the Glory cl his Head/hip feems not to Rand in it ; in Sa notification he as our Head communicates fan£hfying Graces to us, to be the matter of ourSanftificanon, but in Juftification he doth not communicate his fatisfi&ion to us, to be the matter of our Juftification ; he merited Juftification upon Gofpel-terms before our Union with him, what. -1 ^6 ChriftV Right eonfncfs Chap. 1 1. What doth he after,or more, as our head in Juilificati- :^/y~^J on?his fatisfaclrion not being communicated to us, he feems not to be fo compleat an Head in Juftification,as in San£tification;to make thisArgument from ChriiVs Headihip more clear, it will not be amifs to confi- der fome paffages in that fifth Chapter to the Ro- mans ; Wherefore as by one Man fin entred into the World, and Death by Sin, and jo Death puffed upon all Men, for that all have finned, verfe 12. in this and the two following verfes one part of the collation, viz. That of Adam being laid down , where is the ■frrafWi* co Hat ion is ? or how is it to be fupplyed ? fome Divines think, that it is quite omitted by the Apoftle, others conceive it to be couched in thofe words, Who is the figure of him that was to come y verfe 1 4. but whether it be the one or the other, fure- ly there mufl be fomewhat underftood on Chrift's part as correfpondent to that of Adam, who was a Type of him, Pifcator fupplies it thus, Plena compu- ratio fie habet quemudmodum per Adam peccatum hit r oii t inomnes homines, & per peccatum mors, eo quod in xidamo omnes peccarunt, fie per Chrijlum Ju- flitia introiit in omnes credentes , & per Juftitiam vita, eo quod in Chriflo omnes credentes pro peccatis fatisfecermit \ he faith, that all Believers fatisfied in Chrift, I intend fomewhat more in this point then I fuppofehedid. Yet I would fpeak leis in words thenfo, I think the expreilion , that we fatisfied in him, is not an expedient one , though in Scripture nothing to me feems to found more like an anfwer to that, i?S* the merit is as beiore, one and th ,^me, and impetrates Juftifi- cation on Gofpel-terms lor all ; on our part there is a difference, one believes, not another; on God's a difference, he juftifies one, not another; but Chrift f.ands only as a common caufe, his Satisfaction is m communi, and conflitutes no one righteous more than another : He is no more, as it Teems, the end of the Law for Righteoufnefs to the Believer, than to the Unbeliever. Now if this be, as it is durusJermo y then it remains that Chrifl's Righteoufnefs is by par- ticular imputation made over to Believers, and fo be- comes the matter of their Justification ; accordingly the Apoftle in Rom. the fifth fpeaks of it, not as a com- mon caufe, but as peculiarized to Believers, fuch as receive Grace : He doth not fpeak of what Chrift merited for all, but of what Chrift as an Head com- municates to his Members : The fcope of the paral- lel between the two Adams evinces this; it be- ing no other than this, That both of them commu- nicate to thole, who are in them. The fum of all is, Adam and Chrift are fet forth by the Apoftle as two communicative Heads; if Adams fin be imputati- vely ours, fo is Chrift' s Righteoufnefs alfo. I fhould now pafs on to another Reafon : But poili- bly fome may object, That there is a great difference between the two Heads. We were feminally in Adam, we receive an Humane Nature from him ; but we were not feminally in Chrift\ we receive not a Nature from him : therefore, though. A dan's fin be Y v in> 3 ) o Chrift V Right eoufnefs Chap. ii. imputatively ours, yet fo is not Chrift 9 s Righte- ouihefs. In anfwer to this T lhall offer feveral things. Firft, We receive an Humane Nature from Adam; but is this the only foundation of the Imputation of his fin to us ? No, furely : Then all the fins of our Progenitors fhoulcl be as much imputed to us, as the firft fin of Adam was. Which I cannot at all believe,- Adam was a moral Head of Holinefs and Righteouf- nefs to all Mankind, but fince the fall, no Man, no,, not Adam himfelf, was fuch; the fin of Adam is u- niverfally imputed to all, even to the moil holy, but fo are not the fins of other Progenitors ; we were not therefore one with Adam only by a Natural union, but by a Divine Conftitution. Secondly, We receive an Humane Nature from Adam; and have we not a Divine Nature from Chrift ? are we not called his Seed ? are we not be- gotten by his Spirit and Word ? were we not in a Spiritual fence feminally in his Blood and Merits? how elfe fhould any fuch thing as the New Creature, be produced in a lapfed Nature ? Thefe things are as proper to make us Parts and Members of Chrift, as an Humane Nature is to make us Parts and Members of. Adam; therefore the communication of Righteoufaefs from thrift muft be as full and great, as the commu- nication of fin is from Adam. Bifliop Vjber tells us, . That we have a more ftrict conjunction in the Spirit with Chrift, then ever we had in Nature with Adam, one and the fame Spirit is in Chrift and Believers, but there is not one Soui in Adam and his Poftcrity : the i ommunication from Chrift therefore, if anfwerable 1 o the Union, muft be as great, nay greater than that from Adam. Thirdly, Adam was a Head both by Nature , and by lw k Hted to va. 3^ 1 by Conititution; Sin, unlefs in Conjunction with Civap. tt Nature, could not pais from him to us , neither could ' we, without a Nature conveyed from him, have been members of him : It did therefore appertain to his Headlhip to convey a Nature to us; but Chrift was &n Head not by Nature, But above it by Divine Coniit- tution; be was not to convey Naturals to us, but fu- per-naturals ; fincethe Fall,Righteoufoefs was not to pafs to us, in Conjunction with Nature ; Nature was to be from one Head , and Righteoufnefs from ano- ther ; we were to be made Members of Chrift, not by communication of Nature , but of Grate ; it therefore did not appertain to his Headfhip to com- municate Nature to us, yet was his Headlhip as potent to convey Righteoufnefs to us, as A~ dams was to convey fin ; the Divine Conftitu- tion made him fuch an Head, that his Satisfa&i- on might become ours for our Juilification : thus much touching this Argument drawn from the Headlhip of Chrift. Fourthly, Thofe Scripture phrafes of being pur- ged , fprinkled , cleanfed , waihed, juftifyed m the 13lood of Chrift, notably import two things, the one, that Juflification is in a fignal manner attributed to ChriiVs Blood, as Sanftification is to the Spirit ; the other, that Chrift' s Blood juitifies by way of Ap- plication : but neither of thefe can ftand , if that Blood be only a meritorious caufe, not the firft , how can Juftification,be fignally attributed to itjwhen as a meritorious caufe, it no le(s impetrates Sanciification than Juftification ? nothing fingular is done by it in the one more than in the other ; not the fecond, how can it juftifie by Application, when as a merito- rious caufe, it operates only by impetration? You Yy 2 will 352 Chrift'i 1 Righteoufnefs Chap. ii. will fay, Chnft's Blood is applyed in the effeft, in ^^V v^ a pardon : I anfwer, thofe Scripture phrafes before quoted, fhew , that the Blood it felt is applyed to us ; how elfe is it faid, that we are purged , cleanfed, fprinkled, wafhed in it ? uniefs it be applyed to us, the phrafes,how emphatical foever, feem to be improper : iurely a fatisfa&ion mud in its own nature be a jufti- fying matter againil the Law , next to an abfolute conformity to the Law. Nothing is or can be more juftifying againfl it then a fatistaftion; when God hath provided a plenary fatisfa&ion to juitifie us, how may we think, that it is not it feif applyed to us aftually to juftifieus, or that fomething lefs than it felf fhould do it ? the Scripture fets forth this Ap- plication on both hands, on our part it is applyed by Faith, We receiving the Atonement f Rom. y. 1 1 . and Chrift, being a propitiation through Faith in his Blood, Bom. 3. 25V and on God's part by Imputation, we being made the Righteoufnefi of God in him, z Cor. f. 21, and the Righteoufnefi of God being upon w, Rom.^.zz. I cannot tell how to think, that fuch an . excellent juftifying matter, as Chrift's Satisfaction is, fhould be provided for us, and yet not applyed to us, according to the terms of the Gofpel: a pardon is, as I take it, upon the fatisfaftion not meerly made but applyed; for it is given to Believers only : if the fatisfaftion be it felf applyed, then that is our Righteonfnefs againft the Law ; if it be applyed in the effeft, that is, in a pardon, then the pardon is the very application, and not a pardon upon a fatisfafrion applyed; or if there be a pardon upon a fatisfaftion applyed, there will be a pardon belore a pardon ; a pardon in the application, and a pardon upon it; if the iatisfaftion be it felf applyed, then it may precede a pardon, Imputul to us. 353 pardon, and a pardon may be upon it- but if it Le ap- Chap. 1 1 piyedonly in theeffeft, in a pardon, then it cannot precede a pardon, no more then a pardon can precede it felf : You will fay, a pardon is not upon a fatis- f aftion applyed, but is the very application. To this I anfwer, the Learned Mr. Gataker faith, remifiio eft Juftificationis efficacis confequens necejfarium; and the worthy Mr. Brad/haw faith , culpa remifiio accurate conftderataneque totumneque pars Juftificationis ex- i ft it , fed contingens tantzm Juftificationis ejfeftus : I conceive , the application of Chrift's Jultifying Blood, is in order ot Nature antecedent to remiflion; under the Law, firft the Atonement waS made , and Blood fprinkled, and then there was forgivenefs; un-. der the Gofpel , firft Chrift's Blood is applyed and fprinkled upon us, and then there is remiilion ; Chrift is a propitiation through Faith in his Blood, faith the Apoltle, Rom, 3. 2 j. and then he adds, To declare his Rijhteoufinefis for the Remijfton of fins : Chrift's Blood is firft applyed, and then remiffion follows upon it; I fay, it follows upon it, but it is no more the fame with it under the Gofpel, then forgivenefs under the Law was the fame with the fprinklings and purify- ings by the Blood of the Sacrifices ; when in Scrip- ture there is attributed to Chrift's Blood , purging, waiting, fprinkling, cleaning from Sin, and to a par- don, covering, blotting out, taking away, andcafting away of Sin , I cannot imagine that both thefe are the fame, as if Chrift's Blood did not by it felf do a- way Sin, but cnlyimpetrate that it might be dene away in a pardon ; I take it , thefe are diftindt , firft that Blood in the fence herein after declared,frees us a culph , end then the consequent parden frees us a Fifth,- £54 Chnft'/ Kighicoiijnefs .Chip. u. Fifthly, If Chri'ft's Righteoialnefs be Imputed to us ; not in it felf, biat in its etleft only , that is, a par- don, then J unification, as to the Law,whoily -coniiils in a pardon j on the other hand , if Juftification do aot ftaad in a pardon, then it (lands in the Imputa- tion ot Chrift's Righteoufnefs to us: in this great point I ilisil offer ieveral thiags. Fnft, The Scripture muft be the great Pvule to judge of Juftification by, there I find that we are ju- stified by Chrill's Blood , that we are made right- eous by iiis Obedience; but that we are juftified by a Pardon, I find not. There I read that Chrift is made to us Righteoufnefs , that we are made the Righteoufnefs of God in him ; but, not that an Im- munity from puniihment is a Righteoufnefs. I know many Learned Divines take Justification and Pardon to be one and the fame, but I fliall confider the chief Scriptures which look that way; The firft is Rom.i-There the Imputation of Righteoufnefs, Ver.6. and the remiflion of fin,Verf.7. and 8. feemto be the very fame ; the quotation of the jz. Pfalm feems to make it clear to anfwer to this. I fliall -confider the fcope of the Apollle : He doth in the third Chapter lay down this Conclufion, That we are justified' by Faith, Ver. 28. and in the fourth Chapter he lays down this, That we are not juftified by Works, Ver. 4. that is, perfeft Works, fuch as Man may glory in, fuch as might make the reward of debt. Abra- ham himfelf could not reach fuch a Juftification : this is proved by two things; the one is this, Abra- hams Faith was counted to him for Righteoufnefs, therefore he was not juftified by Works : For Faith is not Works. The other is this, A juftified Man is a pardoned one, therefore he is not juftified by Works; for Imputed to m. 3^5 for perfect Obedience leaves no room at all for a Par- Chap. 1 i. don. Touching the firft, I Jhall firft confider what ^/VU was the object of Abrahams Faith, and then how- Faith is counted for Righteoufnefs : The primary ob- ject of Abrahams Faitn was Chrifl ; for the Apoftle in the third Chapter fpeaks of the Faith of CfiriS'j and in the fourth, where the fame Difcourfe of Ju- stification is continued , the object cannot in any reafon be varied. Abraham is fet forth as a great pattern of believing, and he can hardly be io to Chriftians , if his Faith had not for fubilance the fame objecl with theirs. The Scripture fore-feeing that God would juftifie the Heathen through Faith 5 preached before the Gofpel unto Abraham ; faying, hi theejha/l all Nations be bleflcel, Gal^.S. That A- Lrahams Faith and ours might have the fame objeft,God took care,that a Gofpel, voAtyynSnrn, Evange- a Bleffing, Chrifl fhould be fet before him: ***?* verblim vtcuharinr his Eyes were fo far opened, that he could TftfT efi * *™* fee Chrifl s day,and in a kind of Triumph r e*>wiliatiJ&L. mil of Faith, rejoyceatit, iJoh.S.^6. ? Tis true, our Faith, as having more of Evangelical light rnit, is more explicite than ^^vzyW's was; Abra- hams was in the Mefli ah in univerfali, in more gene- ral terms; ours is in him in particular?, in proprifr forma , in a Satisfying atoning Meffiah, in his Blood and Righteoufnefs ; neverthelels (this being but a gra- dual difference according to gradual Light) our Faith and Abraham's are for fubilance the fame and center in one objeft ; and ChrijFs Righteoufnefs and Sa- • titfa&icn, though not fo clearly known to Abraham, 26 to us, was no left imputed to him than to us, there being the fame way of Juftification by Impu- ted righteoufnefs for him as for us. Chrifl being the oi left; %6 ChriflV l\ightcoufnefs Chap. ii. object of Abrahams Faith, the next thing is, how ^A> Faith is imputed for Righteoufnefs. Here 1 anfwer, Faith is counted for Righteoufnefs, not as taken in abfiraclo, meerly in it felf, but as taken in concrete, in its conjunction with its object : that is,Chrifi and Ins Righteoufnefs, and then we have the full Right- eoufneis of Juitification, Faith in it felf anfwenng to the Gofpel-terms, and in its object Chriffs Right- eoufnefs anfweringtotheLaw. Here I crave leave to fet down the words of an Excellent Perfon, though different from my felf in this point; the words are Sir Charles thefe : "Faith looks both ways, refpects both the WoiuJuJZif. « L aw anc J the Gofpel, and comprizeth all that is re- vang. 4^ ci q U jf lte t0 our Juftlification with reference to both; " all the charge of the Law it anfwers rati one object*, " in refpect ol its object, which is Cbrift, and all that " is required by the Gofpel, ratione Jut, as being 4i it felf the performance of the condition annex- u ed thereunto. Thus he; I quote not thefe words, as if in this point he were of my opinion, but becaufe they are full and expreffive of my thoughts : Now, that Faith is in this place to be taken in con- junction with its object, appears thus; theApoftle in the third Chapter proves, That as to the Law every Mouth muft be rtopped, that all the world mull be- come guilty before God, verfe 19, and then con- cludes, that by the deeds of the Law, no Flelh can be juflified, verfe 20. And in his After-difcourfe (as the following words (but now) do import) lie iheweth what it is that jaftifieth us againfl the Law, viz. The Righteoufnefs of God ; that is of Chrifl, which is. not Faith it felf, but by Faith, Verf. 21, & 22. And at lair he concludes, That we are juflified by Faith, Verf. 28. but Faithia it felf cannot juftific us Imputed to it*. 35 r : us againft the Law ; for Faith was not crucified for Chap. 1 1 ns, neither did it fatisfie Jtiftice on our behalf; it is v --^/~v> therefore Faith in its object:, that is CiiriiVs Right- eoufnefs which juftifies us againft the Law- that Faith which is counted for Righteoufnefs, is that which eftabli/hes the Law, Verf. j 1 . and that Eftablifliment Faith makes, not in it icli, but in its object, Chrift's Righteoufnefs, which eitabliihed the Law by fatisfy- 5 ing of it ; Faith therefore and its object mufc be taken together : Hence the Apoftle, who mentions the Im- putation of Faith. Vcr. j. in the 4. Chapter, menti- ons alfo the Imputation of Righteoufnefs, Ver. 6. It's true, both are but one in fence , but in words the latter expfeffes the object of Faith, as the former doth the Act : Thus, as I (aid before, Faith in Conjunction. with its object takes in the whole of Justification, and then the after-words, quoted out of the Pfalm, touch- ing Remifiion, do not defcribe the Imputation of ; Righteoufnefs in its proper Nature, but in its blefled Fruit, viz. Pardon of fin, which is not properly our Righteoufnefs, but a confequent upon it. Another place is this; Through this Man is preached unto you the Forgiven efs of fin ; and by him all that believe are j uft ified frvm all things, from which you could not he j 'uftified by the Lam of Mofes, Atts 13. 38, & 39. Here it feems, that what is called Remifiion in the " firft verfe, is called Juftification in the next : but I take it, they are not the fame in the 3 8. Ver. We have Remiffioii'in the offer or tender of the Gofpel, in the 3 9. we have Juftification actual as it is in the Believer. So they are not the fame ; Juftification here is not Remifiion, but Juftification by Sacrifice,- Juftificati- on by Chrift's Sacrifice is oppofed to Juftification by the Legal ones : Juftification by thefe was typical, Zz and 558 ChriitV Righteoufnefs Chap. 1 1. and but in fome cafes, the Law not allowing a Sacri- fice in all, but Juffifkation by that is real, and in all cafes where Faith is not wanting ; here therefore Ju- ftification and Remiffion are not the fame. Another place is Luke 18. when the Publican penitentialiy prayed far Pardon, God be merciful to me a Sinner \ he went home juftifted, Verf.i^^ 14. Juftified is the fame with Pardoned. I anfwer, This place ihews that Juftification follows upon true Repentance, but not that Juftification and Pardon are the fame ; the Satisfaction of Chrift juftifies a Sinner, a Pardon only frees him from punifliment. To name but one place more ; The Free-gift is of many offences to juftifica- tion, Rom,, 5*. 1 6. to p^-W^*, the Free-gift, feems here to import Pardon, as if Pardon and Juftification were all one. To this I anfwer \ The Apoftle in this fa- mous place fets down a Parallel between the two Heads, Adam and Chrift ; Adam's- Sin and Chrift's Righteoufnefs ; Adams Sin making us Sinners unto death, and Chrift's Righteoufnefs making us righte- ous unto Life. But the word (Pardon or Remifiion) is not fo much as once named in all the Parallel; by the Free-gift Verf. 16. is not meant Remiffion, but Chrift's Righteoufnefs. This is clear upon a double account : the one is this ; The Free-gift is oppofed to Adams fin, and that which in this Parallel is oppofed to Adams fin,muft needs be Chrift's Righteoufnefs ; this appears throughout the whole Parallel, in the 1 y, & 1 6. l^erf. Adams Sin and the Free-gift are oppofed* aa the 18. Ferf. Adams Offence and Chrift's Righte- oufnefs are oppofed; in the 19. Verj\ A darns Difo- . bedience and Chrift's Obedience are oppofed : Hence it appears, that what is the Free-gift in the 15, and .16. forf is the Righteoufnefs or Obedience of Chrift In Imputed to ttf. 3^ in the 18.© 1 9. Verf. neither indeed can the Parallel Chap. i 1 ftand, if any other thing than Chrtfis Righteouf- ^Y\> nefs lhould be oppofed to Adams fin. The other is this; thefe words, The Free-gift, are put inftead of ChrijFs Righteoufnefs or Obedience ; this appears in that, where the one is mentioned, the other is omit- ted, in the 1 5, 16,17. ^ er L The Free-gift is mention- ed, but the Righteoufnefs or Obedience of Chrift is omitted ; in the 18, and 19. Verf. the Righteoufnefs and Obedience of Chrift is mentioned, but the Free- gift is omitted. Indeed in our Tranflation we have the Free-gift Verf.i%. but not in the Original. Hence it appears that they are the fame ; I fuppofe that in the 18. Verf fhould be otherwife (applied : Thus it appears that the Free-gift is not Pardon. Having feen the moft material Texts; I fhall obferve one thing more : Juftification is fet forth in fuch a way in Scri- pture, that it muft needs be diftinct from Pardon : It is fet forth fo, that the Law is eftablifhed by it, Rom. 3.31. but the Law is not eftablifhed by a Pardon, but by a Satisfaction. You will fay, Our Pardon k upon a Satisfaction ; but if that Satisfaction do not juftifie us, if it be no Ingredient in our Juftification ; then in our Juftification the Law is not eftablifhed as the Apoftle fpeaks; Juftification is fet forth fo, that the Righteoufnefs of the Law is fulfilled in us, Rom. 8. 4. But the Righteoufnefs of the Law is not ful- filled in a Pardon ; neither is it fulfilled in our im- perfect, though fincere Obedience : The Greek word ^/xai»^tf, is, as Ariflotle jaipb , Ijnvo^fA* t« a«/W|K*T©^ Eth. I. 5% Correftio injuria y Satisfaction for the injured Law, cap. 7. but nothing is fuch but Chrift's Righteoufnefs. The Apoftle in the precedent Verfe faith, That fin was condemned in the Fleih of Chrift; and of this , there Zz 2 is 360 ChriitV Righteoufnefs Chap. ii. is a double Fruit ; firft Justification*: The Righteouf- - nefs of the Law is fulfilled in us ; that is,.Chnft s Sa- tisfaction becomes imputativeiy ours, and then Sah- clification; we walk not alter the Flefh^but after the: Spirit : This Interpretation harmonizes with the firft Verfe ; there firft w r e have juftification, There is no' Condemnation to them who are in Chrift * and then Salification* We walk not after the Fleih, but after the Spirit ; as therefore Chrift's Righteoufnefs is the only thing which fatisfies the Law r ,lo it is the only ju- itifying matter againft it : Juftification is fo fet forth, that the Law hath its end : Thus the Apoftle, Chrijl is the end of the Law for RighteoufneJ's to the Be* //ever , Rom. 10. 4. as he is the end of the Law, fo he is for Righteouihefs ; he is not the end of the Law in a procured pardon, but in a Satisfaction made and applied; Juftification therefore confiftsnot in a Par- don,, but in a Satisfaction, applied and made ours by Imputation. Thus far out of Scripture. Secondly y Juftification cannot be without a Righteoufnefs ; that God (who judgeth according to truth, whoisJuft > and a Juftifyer ) doth not efteem or pronounce us righteous unlefs we are fo 5 a. pardon is not our Righteoufnefs ; for that is God's Aft , and God's Aft, though it may make or efteem us righte- ous, is not it fell our Righteoufnefs, neither is that , which a pardon gives, viz, an immunity from pu- nifhment ; filch an immunity from punifhmenr, which is, ex meru indulgentia, as in the cafe of a par- doned Malefactor, is. not fuch; the. Malefactor in that cafe is treated in point of punifhment as a right- eous Man, but he is not fuch indeed, his plea is only a pardon, he is free only a pana^ not a culpa , the Judge doth not efteem him. as righteous, but as one exempt: Imputed to us. 361 exempt from puniihment ; nay, an immunity, which Chap. 1 1 is exjuftiti'a, as in the cafe of an innocent perfbn, ^-< though it fuppofe a llighteoufnefs in him, yet it is no more it felf a rigbteoufnefs than in the other cafe; it is dill i net from his llighteoufnefs as a confequent is from its antecedent : Now if a pardon or immuni- ty from puniihment be not our llighteoufnefs , then Chrift's llighteoufnefs (which was penal and obediential to an infinite value, and did com- penfate the very culpa ^ and free us from it) is, as foon as it is made ours by Imputation, our Rigbteoufnefs againfttheLaw. Thirdly, If a pardon might be called JuftificatP on,it is but improperly fuch ; there are then as(I will fuppofe for Difcourfe fake) three forts of Juftiflcati- on to be diftinguifhed, one by the idem^ the very fame perfect Righteoufnefs, which the Law calls for ,. ano- ther by the tantundem, a Righteoufnefs which is a plenary fatisfaction to the broken Law ; a third by Remiilion only : the firft is more ftrictly Juftifi- cation than the fecond , becaufe the very Letter of the Law is fulfilled in it, which it is not in the other; the fecond is more properly Juftification than the third, becaufe there is a plenary compenfation to the Law in it; when in the other there is nothing but a meer condonation : the third is the moft improper Juftification of all the reft, becaufe it communicates not a Righteoufnefs , but an Indulgence.- Now in our cafe, had there been no fatisfaction at all, Jufti-? fixation, if pofiibie, muft have flood in remifiicn on- ly ,• but a great and glorious fatisfaction being made, it feems very ilrange, that Juftification ihould confift only in the lefs proper, in remiilion, which frees us a /fcr//«J, whilfl the proper, Chrift's Satisfaction, winch. in o 6% ChriftV Righteoufnefs Chap. 1 1. in a way of compenlation, frees us a culpa, is waved : It is true, it is not totally waved; it is allowed to be an antecedent meritorious cau.fe of Jufbficition, but being no Ingredient in it, Justification Hill confifts m the lefs proper, while the more proper in that re- ipect is waved. Before I pafs on , I mull confider one objection; pardon takes away reatum pence , the obligation to punifliment, and what more can be done to a finner ? it ill the re at us culpa abides, the fault will be a fault ; the Sinner a Sinner ; that is, one who finned; and if no more can be done to a finner, why is not immunity from punifliment, his Righteoufnefs, or what can be Righteoufnefs if that be not fo ? In anfwer to this great Objection, I fhall offer two or three things. Firft, It is indeed a rule of reafon, that, fattum in- fetlum fieri non pot eft \ yet it is worthy the conside- ration of the Learned , whether the culpa , which ever continues in faclo, initfelf may not yet ceafe in jure j fo far as not to redound upon the Perfon to make him culpable ? I fhall only mention one in- ftance, and fo leave it; theBlefled Virgin, not being, as her Son was, conceived of the Holy Ghoft , was no doubt fubject to Original Sin , that put a culpd upon every part of her , and factum infeclum fieri non poteft. Neverthelefs, when the Word was made Fleili ; when his Body was framed out of the Subftancc of the Virgin, no culpa did remain, or re- dound upon his Humane Nature, much lefs upon his Sacred Perfon which aflumed it: in Sacred Myfteries we mufl not be too peremptory upon our reafon , but fpeak with all caution and re- verence. Secondly, Imputed to ws. 261 Secondly, Beatus culpa, or guilt of fault, may be Chap, n confidered under a double notion , either in it feif, in its intrinfecal clefert of punifliment, or elfe in its re- dundancy upon the finner , which confifts in three things. Firft, it fo redounds upon him as to deno- minate him a firmer , that is, one who hath finned; then it fo redounds as to make him continue worthy of punifliment ; and again it fo re- dounds , as actually to oblige him to punilhment : Now the re at us in its felf, in its intrinfecal de- fert , mud needs be perpetual , becaufe fin cannot ceafe to be fin, the denominating him a finner, one who hath finned, muft be perpetual too, becaufe factum infettum fieri non potefi : but, as I take it, that redundancy which makes him worthy of punifli- ment, is removed in Juftification , and that which actually obliges him to punifliment, is removed in remiilion;it is ufually faid in the Schools//- an fit atlus, manet reatus, after the Act of Sin is palled and gone, the guilt abides ; we may fay of the finner , that he hath finned in prceterito, nay, and in prcefenti, that he is films mortis, worthy to die, and fuffer punifli- ment ; but after he hath received the great atone- ment, after ChriiTs fatisfadtion (which is more than an tequipondium to his umvorthinefs) is Imputed and made over to him, he continues no longer worthy of punifliment; the fin 'it felf is w r orthy of it, but he is not; he was once worthy of it , but now T he is no longer fo. I cannot imagine, that ChriiVs «£/<>/ , or worthy ones , Rev. 3. 1. fliould remain afyot $*v*T* y worthy of Death, Rom. 1. 32. Or that the pure Hea- vens fliould be inhabited by fuch as ftill continue, worthy of Hell: ChriiVs Righteoufnds fo much out- weighs and cotftit^gioifes the mtritufn pdence that is im 364 ChriftV Righteoufnefs in fin, that though the worthinefs of punilhmeat rannot be feparated from the fin it felf , yet it ceafes to redound upon the firmer , as foon as he believes •and hath an intereft in that Righteoufnefs: Its true, the (inner as he is in himfelf, is worthy of punifiv- xnent, but as he is in Chrift, a part or Member of him, a participant of his Satisfaction , he is not worthy •thereof. Thirdly, If welookdiftin&ly upon a fatisfaclrion, or plenary compenfationfor fin of the one hand, and upon a pardon, or immunity from punifhment of the other, it will be cafily feen where our Righteoufnefs lies, and what is our justifying Plea and matter a- gainft the Law; a pardon frees from puniihment, but a Satisfaction falves the honour of the broken Law. repairs the damage done to it, compenfates for tbe violations of it, and comes in the Room of that perfed conformity which the Law did primarily aim at : in this therefore , not in the other ftands our Righteoufnefs as to the Law. Thus much touching my fifth Reafon, that Juftification confifts not in a pardon. Sixthly, Chrift fuffered noftro loco , in our place and ftead ; thofe pregnant Scriptures (that he gave his Life a ranfom £m my**v, in the ftead of many, Matth. 20. 28. that he gave himfelf hv\v?sw a coun- terprize for all, 1 Tim. 2. 6. that hz fuffered the juft for the unjuft, 1 Pet. ^ 18.) are no cold improprie- ties, but full proofs of it; he did fujlinere nojtram perfonam , fuflein our f erf on in his fuffe rings ; there was a double conamutaton, his perfon was put in the room of ourjperfons, and his fufferings in the room of our fufferings ; he that fatisfies for .another ? muft do it nomine debit oris , he that pays Imputed to us. 365 pays in his own name , cannot fatisfie for another. Chap. 1 1 When our Saviour faid to Peter , That give *w kfi^rt ' for me and thee, Matth. 17. 27. [(Peter had paid it only in his own name, he could not have fatisfied for his Mafter. In like manner , if Chrift had fuflered only in his own Name, he could not have fatisfied for Peter or any other : The Debt which he fatisfied for was ours, not his ; he flood as our Reprefentative, and fatisfied for us ; he did not only fuffer noflro bono, that the profit might be ours, but noftro loco, that the Satisfa&Lonit felt might be ours; nevertheiefc,accord- ing to Divine Conftitution ; that is, that it might be ours ; not immediately, but as foon as we become Members of him ; not according to the full latitude, but according to the capacity of Members; not to all intents, but that it might be the matter of our Ju- ftification as to the Law. Having laid down my Reafons, I fliall now pro- ceed to anfwer the Objections made againft Imputed Righteoufnefs ; only here I muft remember the Rea- der of one thing. Let him not think that there are no Myfleries in our Religion, as if all there were within the line of Humane Reafon : There are Super-rational Myfleries in Chrift's perfon ; mortal and immortal, temporal and eternal, the Creature and the Creator; do in an ineffable manner meet together in one Per- fon ; and why may there not be fuch in Chrift My- ftical too ? The union between Chrift and Believers is a great Myftery, Ephef. j. 3 2. and the communica- tion of his Righteoufnefs to them, which enfues up- on that union, hath too much of Myftery in it to be meafured by Humane Reafon. Proclus faid well, T7 J>i toyifpotf dyZfcoTrlvoii KaSufyt^Hf t* fl«*, " Why doll "thou reproach Divine things with Humane Rea- A a a " fon- ^66 ChrillJ Right eoufnefs Chap. 11. " fonings ? Reafon is no competent Judge of fuch > matters. Object, i. An Accident cannot be removed from its $*6jec~l : Chrijfs Right eoufnefs is an accident. Anf. An Accident cannot be removed from its Subjecl, fo as to have a novel inliefion ; but it may be transferred by a juft Imputation. I iliall give two inftancesofthis: Adams fin was imputed unto us, • if not, then, as I have before proved, there can be no fuch thing as original fin,the ©octrine of which hath been owned by the Church in all Ages : Again, our fin was imputed unto Chrift, elfe his fufferings could not be penal ; the Scripture is emphatical, he was made Sin for us, 2 Gor.).2 1 . The Lord hath laid on him the iniquities of us all, Efa. J 3.6/ St. Aujlin faith, that he was delitlorum ifufceptor, noncommiffor. St. Jerom faith, non de ccelis attulit, fed de nobis af~ funifft : if our fin was not at all imputed to him, his fufferings could not be penal : To clear this, I iliall firft prove that Chrifts fufferings were penal in a pro- per fence, and then , that they could not be fuch without fin imputed : Firft, Chrift's fufferings w r ere penal; in Scripture we find,that our fins were born in his body, and condemned in his fleJh, that he was wounded and bruifed for them, that he was made a curfe for us; all which fpeak penal fufferings : If his Offerings were not penal, how were they fatisfadro- ry ? a proper fatisfadtion can hardly be proved from .an improper puniihment. How 7 did he fuffer in our ftead; Ifiie did, it was in a no-punifhment, which is all one, as if Archelaus had reigned in the room of his Father in a No-kingdom : what •jr«j##«Jtut, or ex- ample was tiiere in his fufferings to deterr us from finr There is no fuch thing in bufferings not penal: what Imputed to us. 3 6j what demonftration of Juftice was there in them ? Chap. n. in fufferings not penal power may appear, but juftice ^-^v°v-^ cannot: We fee here his fufferings were- penal, but without fin imputed how could they be fo .- Sooinus ( who would not have them penal, left they lhould be fatisfadlory too faith, that Chrift died, quia it a &» Deo & ipfi vifum eft, becaufe fo it feemed good -to De J erv - 1* J« God and him : but would this make his fufferings ca P' 9 ' penal ? no, he intended no fuch thing, neither will this doit; God's meerWill may inflict fufferings, but nothing but Juftice can inflid: punifhment. Ju- ftice, unlels moved, inflicts it not; neither is there any other mover,but that of fin imputed. Where no fin is imputed, there it is, as to puniihment, all one as if there were no fin; and where there is no fin at all, there can be no fuch thing as puniihment : We are therefore under a neceflity to fay, that fin was in tantum, fo far imputed to Chrift as to render his fuf- ferings penal, and withal we fee an accident pa/Ting to another by imputation ; only here it will be ob- jected, that fin was only imputed to Chrift in the effects ; but, I take it, this fuifices not; for the effed: of fin is puniihment; and puniihment cannot be, where no fin is imputed; a puniihment without a why or a wherefore, is a punifhment for nothing ; that is, it is no puniihment; and where there is no % puniihment, fin is not fo much as imputed in the ef- iecl:. So that if it be imputed in the effect, it felf muft be fo far imputed, as to render the fufferings penal, which makes good the inftance. Object. 2. If ChriiYs Right eoufnefs be indeed im- puted to us, then it is imputed in the full latitude ; we are reputed by God to have fat is fie d Divine Juftice, we are then imputatively our own Saviours and Redeemers; Aaa 2 Nay, 3^8 €110(1'/ Right eon fnefs Chap. ii. Nay, as Bellarmine faith, Redemptores & Salvatp- res Mundi, Redeemers an el Saviours of the World, Anf If this Principle, That all Imputation is in the full latitude, be true, I yeild up the caufe for ever. I am fure I am not my own Saviour or Re- deemer ; I never fatisfied Divine Juftice for my fins ; but that this Principle is not true, I fhail endeavour to manifeft. Non-imputation and Imputation muft needs have the fame Rules to be governed by : this, I fuppofe,muft not be denied by thofe who fay,That the Non-imputation of fin,is the Imputation of Right- oufnefs, Rom. 4. 1. Sin is riot imputed to Believers : But how what, totally and in every refpect ? No, furely ; ftill the culpa abides, the fin will be a fin, the Sinner a Sinner; that is, one who finned; but it is not imputed as to punifliment : If Sin may be Non-imputed in fome refpefts , then Righteoufnefs may be imputed in a limited fence alfo ; if all Impu- tation be in the full latitude, then there is no Impu- tation of a thing at all Q fave only to the proper doer of it)neither according to Principles of meer Nature, nor according to Principles of Jultice, nor yet accord- ing to a Divine Conftitution : Not according to Prin- ciples of meer Nature ; according to thefe fin inter- nal in the Will is imputed to the Members of the Body, as being in conjunction with the Soul ; cKq the Body fhould not rife and fuffer for it : But how is it imputed ? what,in the full latitude ? Doth God ac- count that the fin properly did ifiue from the Men> bers, and re fide there ? It is not true, or poflible, yet in a lower and diminutive manner is it to them im- puted ; nor according to Principles of Juftice ; our fin (and that, as but now was proved ) not in the effect ©nly, but in fome fence in it fett, was imputed to ChriJk Imputed to r^s. %6p Ckriji ; and that upon Principles of Juftice, upon his Chap, i i. Sponfion tofatisfie tor us,our fin was imputed to him; V -^V ^ but what in the full latitude ? what to make as if there were a fpot or turpitude in the Holy one ? as if he by his own finful commiflions had deiervcd penal fufferings ? No, by no rjieans; but in the lead reipedt that could poilibly be, in no other refpeft than this, viz. So far as to render his fufferings penal. Nor yet according to the Divine Conftitution ; this is moft proper to the prefent cafe. And for this I muft bring forth the Parallel of the two Adams, becaufe there never were any two fuch Heads as thefe : Adams fin, as I have before proved,\\ r as imputed to us ; but what, in its full latitude ? Were we the Head oi Mankind ? did we uflier in Sin and Death upon the World, as Adam did? No: This was by one Adam\ but in a lower meafure,and according to the capacity of Mem- bers; it came upon us, as Be liar mine well expreffes it, Eo mo do, quo communicdri pot eft id quod tranfit^. nimirum per imputationem ; it came upon us ex pofi fatto, after the aftion done ; Interpretative and by way of reception, it only fo far redounded upon us, as by that fin to make us finners, Rom. 5-. 1 9. In like manner, Chrift's Righteoufnefs is imputed to us ; but what, in its fulf latitude ? were we the Saviours or Redeemers of the World ? did we uilier in Life and. Righteoufnefs upon the Church? No ; This was by oneChrift; but in a lower meafure, and according; to the capacity of Members ; it comes upon us only by Imputation, and Interpretative, it only fo far re- dounds upon us, as by that Righteoufnefs to make us righteous againft the Law, Rom. 5-. 19. Thcfe things being laid down, it appears, that the Imputa- tion of ChnlVs Righteoufnefs to us doth not imply that 370 ChriftV Right eonfnefs Chap. ii. that we are our own Saviours or Redeemers, much lefs that we are fiich to the World ; w r e did not fati£ fie Divine Juitice.: No: This is, as Bifhop Davenant tells Bellarmine, Ridicula Ulatio, a diing which can- not be inferred from imputed Righteoulnefs ,- we do only as Members of Chrift fo far participate of his Satisfaction, as to be thereby juftified againft the Law. To fay, that his Satisfaction, if imputed to us, mult become ours as amply as it is his, is to fay things impoilible, as if Imputation were as much as Aftion ; or the derivative could equalize the Primi- tive ; as if Head and Members, becaufe there is a communication between them, muft be confounded and become the fame,as if the Believer, if once called "into Communion with Chrift, as the Apoftle fpeaks i Cor. 1.9. muft become a Chrift, a Saviour or Me- diator; all which is meer confufion : But in Imputati- on,the proportion betweenHead and Members is kept inviolate. Chrift the Head communicates to Belie- vers, yet Salva prserogativa capitis ; Believers receive from him, but it is only in the meafure of Members. Obje£t. }. If ChriJFs Righteoufnefs be imputed to usjhen God reputes us to have made fatisfatlion, and jo errs in his Judgement, which cannot be. Anf. God without error imputes Adams fin to us; yet doth not repute us to be the very doers of it : he without error imputes the internal fin of the Will to the Members of the Body, yet doth not repute the Members to have done it ; Chrift's Satisfaction is not imputed to us as to Agents, but as to Participant Members ; and that truly, becaufe according to that Divine Conftitution, which made Chrift an Head as itrong to communicate Righteoulnefs, as Adam was ro convey fin. Objed. Imputed to us. 371 Object. 4. If Chrift's Righteoufnefs be* imputed to Chap. 11 us, then we are as righteous as Chrift is. Anf. The Confequence is abfurd, and the Learned Chamier gives this Reafbn,/ r /£r* non pofje,ut tamjuflus Jttj qui inhar enter injuftus \ imputative ju ft us efi y quam qui Mnhcer enter juftus; nam ifte afe & per fe juftus eft, 7 He tantum precario, id eft , aliunde S? in alio ; Chrift's Righteoufnefs hath diftinctrefpecfc; as to himfelf it was the idem, as to us the tantundem; as it was in- herent in him, it was Juftify ing and Sanctifying too; as it is imputed to us, it is Juftifying only ; it was Chrift's in the Agency ; the glory ot it is ours only by Participation ; Chrift is the Author of the Satisfa- ction ; we are but the Receivers in the quality of Members ; it was his in the capacity of a Sponfor, Sa- viour, Redeemer, Mediator, Head; it is ours only derivatively, and as participant Members of him. Object, j. Imputed Right eoufne ft is the root of Anti- t inom ianifm, this diffolves the Lam, as if it did no longer oblige us to Obedience. Anf. Chrift's Righteoufnefs is not imputed to us as it is the idem of the Law, but as it is a Satisfaction made thereunto neither was that Satisfaction meant : to diflblve the Law-obligation, fo as that it ihould ceafe to be a Rule of Hohnefs in point of San&ifica- tion ; but to diflblve it fo, as that the Law ihould demand from Believers no other matter but it felf in point of J unification. Did it ceafe to be a Rule of Holinefs in Sanctification ; we mull, ail be Antino* mians. Did it not ceafe to demand no more than it felf in Juftification, we mud all be undone: its fur- ther demand, viz. Perfect Obedience from us in our Perfons being impoflible, Juftification and Salvation rauit be fo alio. Chrifti> Sat an was made, that vi e 72 ChriftV 7{ighmnfaefi Chap. ii. we might bejuftifiable againft the Law; it is imputed, that we may be actually juftified againft it. If the Satisfaction imputed run into Antinomianifmfo doth the Satisfaction made, which is indeed the Socinian Contr.Meip:. out-cry ; Quis nexus, quce copula inter fidem, quacre- ic8. ditur Chrijlum pro nobis Deo plenijjime fat i s feci j]e y & inter lonorum operum ftudium ? So Schliclingius ; De Ver. Rtl. Quid caufce eft, cur is y qui Jatisfaftiwem iftam perfua- ' S' c ' xz ' jam habens, aliquid y in re pe Hen da afe impietate y ju- ftitiaq; colenda, labor is fibi ponendum exiftimet ? So Volkelnts : Now what is anfwered on the behalf of Satisfaction made, viz. That the Law is ftill a Rule of Holinefs; that Chrift's Satisfaction is aninflam- mative to it, that the juft odium of fin is {Qtn in the atoning Blood ; that that Blood is fprinkled only up- on Believers, with the like ; the fame may be as truly anfwered on the behalf of Satisfaction imputed. Object.6. If Chrift's Righteoufneft be imputed to us, then God fees no fin is in us. Anf God fees not fin in us with a vindictive Eye, but with an intuitive one he doth ; . nay,he cannot but dofo, aslongasthereisomnifcienceinhim, and fin in us; Chrift's Righteoufnefs is imputed to us as it is a Satisfaction; and that fuppofcs us to have been Sinners; elfe what need could there be of a Satisfa- ction ? though the Law were fatisfied in point of Ju- itification, yet ftill it demands duty in point of San- dtification; though that Satisfaction take away the imperfection of our duties and Graces as to the guilt, yet not as to the very being. Objedt. 7. If Chrift's Righteoufnefl be imputed to us, there needs no new Obedience in order to Salvation. Anf The Soc/nians object this againft Chrift's Sa- tisfaction ; in which notion I take it, that Chrift's right- Imputed to us. 373 righteoufnefs is imputed to us. **S7 jam Deo plene Chap. 1 1. per joint urn ejl^ quod ei a nobis plene debebatur , quid ^ s~V^J adhuc nos pietate & bonis operibus maceremus .- jam Jf ont -Mei\. nec Dew nos jure pun/re, nee ab edema vita jure ex- clude re poteft ; fo Schlittingius. But Chriil's Satisfa- ction may very well ftand with our obedience,- Chrift fatisfied the Law fo far, as that his righteouf- nefs imputed jullifies us againft the Law, but not fo far, as that it fliould be our very fan&ity and holi- nefs: for then, of imputed, it fliould become fuch as they are, inherent; which is impoflible : in this re- fpeft therefore the Law asks obedience from us, every Believer is hronQ- xp/rf. Under the Law to Chrift, as far under it as it is a rule to our life. Nay, Chrilt's righteoufnefs is fo far from evacuating our obedience , that it is the great foundation upon which the Holy Spirit, the fountain of Holinefs, is communicated to us , as it was under the Law in cleanfing the Leper; the holy Oyl was put upon the Atoning Blood, Levit. 14. 17. So it is under the Gofpei in purifying us. Firit, the Blood of Chrift is fprinkled on us by imputation, and then the holy Unclion, the Divine fpint, is poured out upon us: were there no Atoning blood flied, the Holy Spi- rit would not fo much as touch upon fallen 'man: were that Blood not applied to us, the Holy Spirit would never dwell in us as a principle of obedi- ence. Object. 8. Chrifls righteoufnefs cannot be both the meritorious and material cauje of Juf if cation^ for then it fhould be both an external and internal cauje thereof: Which cannot be. Anf We mult not here take our meafures from reafon ; it was well faid by one, In Logic 15 ratio facit Bbb M w. 374 ChriftV Right eoufnefs Chap. 11. fidem, in Theologicis fides facit raf&tffw, Evangelical myfteries, though above the line of humane reafon, muft be owned in Faith, though the mode cf them be inexplicable by us ; Chrift's righteoufnefs may be confidered under a double refpedi, either as it is offered up to God, or as it is applied to men. In the firft refpedt it is common for all , fo far as to render them juftifiableon Gofpel terms: In the fe-. cond it is peculiarized to Believers ; In the firft it founds the promifes of juftification by Chrift's blood, in the fecond it executes them , and ( which is as eafily conceiveable as the other ) in the firft it is a meritorious caufe of juftification ; in the fecond a material. Having anfwered thefe Objections, which I look upon as mod material ; I fhall conclude as I began, that Chrift's righteoufnefs, as it is a Satisfaction, is fo far imputed to his believing members , as to be the matter of their juftification: The Law in that point can ask no more of them than that fatisfadi- on ; there is enough in that to anfwer for all their fins. Thus far I have treated touching our righteouf- nefs as to the Law. I now come to fpeak of our righteoufnefs as to the Gofpel ; Chrift's righteouf- nefs anfwers as to the Law of works : Faith an- fwers as to the terms of the Gofpel. Do this, or die, was fatisfied by Chrift's righteoufnefs : Believe and live ; is anfwered by Faith. Chriflus eft irnple- tio Legis , Spirit us eft impktio Evangelii : Now here I iliall firft fhew the neceffitv of this two-fold righteoufnefs ; and then the connexion which is be- tween them. r » There is a neceffity of this two-fold righteouf- nefs. Imputed to us. 3 75 nefs. God at firft made man a holy, righteous crea- Chap. 1 1 ture; and upon the fall, he fet to his hand afecond time to lift up man out of the Chains of Sin and wrath, into a ftate of Grace and Life eternal. God as Creator gave man a Law of perfect obedience fuited to his primitive nature, and as it were inter- woven with the principles of it. God as Redeemer gave us a Law of Grace ; in which there is as much abatement and condefcention to our fain eftate, as could comport with his own Holinefs and Majefty ; In the former God ftood upon the higheft terms of perfect finlefs obedience; m the latter he comes down to the loweft terms imaginable : He will ju- ft i fie and fave every one who by true Faith yields and refigns himfelf up to the conditions of the Gofpel ; where there are diftinct Laws, there mult be diftinct righteoufneftes to anfwer them : That which comes up to the condefcending terms of the Gofpel : falls much fhort of the high terms of the Law ; That which fatisfies the Law, is a thing of incomparably greater excellency than that which anfwers to the terms of the Gofpel : There are two diftinct charges, or accufations to be fuppofed ,• the one, that w r e are Sinners, fuch as have broken the Law : The other, that we are Unbelievers, fuch as have rejected the Gofpel : Here therefore mud be diftinct Plea's ; To the Firft, the Plea is Chrift's Sa- tisfaction to difcharge us from the Law : To the Second, the Plea is Faith, which is the condition of the Gofpel. To the charge of final unbelief it is no Plea to fay, that Chrift hath fatisfied; to the charge of being a finner, the Plea doth not confift in Faith it felf; but in its object, viz. Chrift's Satisfaction .- The righteoufnefles themfelves are of different na- Bbb 2 tures, 37^ ChriiVi 1 Rigbteonfnefs Chap. ii. tures, as to the Law our righteoufnefs is without us, in the glorious Satisfaction of Chnft made ours by a gracious imputation ; as to the Gofpel, our righte- oufnefs is within us, in that Faith which complies with the Evangelical terms; as to theLaw,our righ- teoufnefs is not the idem, but a fatisfachon made for the breaches of it ; as to the Gofpel, our Faith is the very idem which the Gofpel condition calls for. It is of great concern in Juftification, to place thefe two righteoufnefies in their proper Orbes ; if either of them be carried out of their own Sphear, Reli- gion is fubverted. As to the Law, Chrift's Satisfa- ction is our only righteoufnefs, it is true ; Faith re- ceives the Atonement, but neither Faith, nor any other inherent Grace can here be our righteouf- nefs. All thefe have their fpots of impertefrion ; how faltring is our Faith ? how cold our chanty ? how much is there wanting in all our graces ? all are but in part , not in their full meafure ; but in their firit lineaments : Neither do they dwell alone, but there is a fad inmate of corruption under the lame Roof : Ail thefe muft pafs fub venia, under a pardon, and under the Wings of Chrift ; thefe are not able to cover their own blots and imperfections; thefe therefore are not our Saviours or Redeemers ; thefe do not fatisfie the Law; thefe do not compen- fate for fin ; thefe do not come in the room of per- fect obedience ; neither can the true God, though one of infinite mercy, accept them as fuch : No,no- thing but ChriiVs Satisfaction can here be our righte- oufnefs. Hence die Apoftle having proved, that all the world is guilty before God. Horn. 5.19. Imme- diately after adds, but now the righteoufnejS of God is wanrfeftedy v. 2 1 .Where by the righteoufnefs of God, that Imputed to us. 377 that of Chrift muft needs be meant ; for that, and Chap. 1 1 that only is proper and appofitc to anfwer that charge ^^Y" v of the Law, which makes us guilty before God ; that was a Salvo to the honour of the Law; that was a ple- nary compensation for the breaches of itjthat came in the room of perfed Obedience ; that therefore is the only, thing which could anfwer that charge : if we bring in Faith, or any other Grace into this Orb, we (et them up as Chrift's or Saviours ; and in effedfc we fay, that Chrift died in vain. As to the Gofpel,Faith anfwers to 'the terms of in- here Chrift's Satisfaction doth not fupply the room : It's true, he fatisfied for us, but he did not repent or believe for us ; for then he Jliould have left nothing for us to do ; no, not fo much as to accept of that glo- rious Satisfaction made for us. His Satista&ion was ' not to fpare, but by its fuperexcellent fulnefs to draw out our Faith to it felf ; his atoning Blood was not to excufe, but upon a view of his Wounds to provoke our repentant Tears; he died not for our fins, that we might live in them; his pure Flefh was not cruci- fied, that our corrupt Flelh might be fpared. The Son of God came not down from Heaven to open a door to Wickednefs, but to promote a defign of Holi- nefs: it is therefore we who muft, though not with- out Grace , repent and believe : Faith muft keep its ' Station, or elfe Holinefs, which is the great Defign of the Gofpel, muft be over-turned. Secondly, The connexion between thefe two Righteoufneftes is to be confidered ; in this connexion lies the total fum of Justification. Chrift's Satisfa- • ction anfwers to the Law; Faith anfwers to the terms of the Gofpel; Believers, who are righteous to both, cannot but be in a very blefted condition ; ne- • ver 378 Chrift V Rigbteonfnefs Chap. 1 1. verthelefs it is to be noted ( as Learned Mr. Baxter hath obferved ) Faith is but a particular Righteouf- nefs, a Righteoufnefs fecundum quid, only as to the performance of the Evangelical condition;but ChrifVs Satisfaction is an Universal liighteoufnefs as to all other things, Hive only that performance, for the final neglect of which he never died:Faith is a liighte- oufnefs as to the Evangelical condition; yet it is but a Righteoufnefs propter aliud, a Righteoufnefs fubor- dinate and fubfervient to that great Righteoufnefs of Chrift's Satisfaction, to make us capable to partici- pate thereof. In this connexion we have an heap of Myfteries let before us ; Juftice is fatisfied by a ple- nary compenfation for fin ; Mercy is exalted, in that w 7 e, though Sinners, are jufhified upon terms on our part as low as the Holy one could poifibry condefcend unto ; the great thing, the Satisfaction, which no Man, no Angel could accompliih, was from Jefus Chrift ; who being God in the Flelh, was able to perform it ,• the comparatively little thing, I mean Faith, which our fallen Nature through Grace might arrive at, was that which was required at our hands; Satisfaction, which we could not have in our felves, we have in another, even in Chrift our Sponfor: Faitli, which we have in our felves, is that capacity whereby we are made meet to have that Satisfaction communicated to us ; the Satisfaction which I think is the Righteoufnefs of God in Scripture mentioned, is communicated to us ; yet, as infinite Wifdom or- dered it,it is communicated to us in the loweft pofture of the Creature ; I mean when we are by Self-em- ptying and Self-annihilating , Faith yielding and resigning up our felves to the terms of the Gofpel ; Faith, which is fubjectively ours, is that capacity wherein Imputed to m. 37^ \\ herein we receive Chriit's Satisfaction ; that Sat; - : Chap. 1 1 fafrion in the Glory and Plenitude is only his ; yet, as the Sun hangs down his Beams to die lower World, it derives it felf upon each Believer, pro rat tone mem* hi : I mention the Sun, becaufe the Prophet tells us, That upon thofe that fear God's Name, The Sim of Righteoufnefs arifes with Healing in hts ; Vitigs ; a choice part of which Healing I take to be in the com- munication of his Satisfaction to us, that only heals the deadlv Wound of Guilt which is upon us. In Chrift's ilighteoufneii there is a Merit to procure Faith ; in Faith there is a capacity to have that Righte- oufnefs made ours ; in that Righteoufnefs there is that which covers the imperfections of Faith. Thus there is an admirable connexion between thefe two RighteoufnefTes : Further touching our Juftification as to the terms of the Gofpel, we muft fifft confider, what that Faith, by which we are juftified, is; and then how we are juftified by it. Firfl, That Faith whereby we are juftified, is not Reafon in its o\\ n Sphere converfing about God and his Goodaefs, but it is totally fupernatural; fuper- natural in its Principle; it is the Gift of God : and, as the fecond Araujkan Councel tells us, It is per infpi- rat'ionem Spirit us fancti^ Can. 6 Supernatural in its objed, it is fixed in a God in Covenant, and in his Grace. It hangs upon Chrift and his Swcet-fmelling Sacrifice. It falls in with fupernatural promifes of Grace and Glory : neither is this Faith a meer naked aftent, which may be in wicked Men; nay, and in Devils ; but it is that which receives Chrift,and feeds i him, eating his Flelb, and drinking his Blood Life Eternal: Fit am a l r hx Font? 1. wrimus, & in ipjurn quafi tot os nos imhiergirnus, faith Biihop Da- venanti 380 ChriftV 7{igbteonfnefs \ Chap. 1 1 . venant ; We draw Life from the Fountain of Life, and wholly drown our felves in him : True Faith takes the Divine objects propofed, not by piece-meal, but in their entirenefs ; it is not meerly for God's Grace, that Hony-comb of infinite fweetnefs; but for his Holinefs too,that the Soul may be more and more transformed and affimilated to theDivine Image and likenefs. Faith very well knows, That no Man,who by his rebellions ftrikes at his Holinefs, can poflibly lean on his Grace : fo to do, is not to believe, but to prefume and trull: in a lye : Faith is for all Chrift ; not only for a meriting and atoning Chrift,but for a teaching and ruling one : it knows that Chrift muft not be mangled or torn in pieces ; the Merit mud not be divided irom the Spirit; nor the Water from the Blood- thefe mull ever be in conjunction ; an half Chrift is not the Chrift of God, but a Chrift of his own iancy, fuch as cannot profit ns; Faith is not meerly for Promifes, which are cor- dials, and Pots of Manna, but for Precepts too ; it is Meat and Drink to doe the Will of God; Promifes and Precepts run together in Scripture ; Promifes are the •effluxes of Grace, and Faith takes them into the heart by recumbency ; Precepts are effluxes of Holinefs, and Faith takes them in by an ObedientiaiSubje&ion; both are owned by Faith, and muft be fo as long as there is Grace and Holinefs in God; Faith cannot ftand without repentance ; ittrufts in Infinite Mercy: and an impenitent one, who ftill holds up his Arms of Rebellion, cannot do fo ; it refts upon the Merits and Rightcoufnefs of Chrift ; and an impenitent one, who tramples under foot the atoning Blood, cannot d j fo. It hath a refpedt for the holy Commands; and the impenitent, who by willful finning calls them away, and as much as in him lietli, makes them void, can Imputed to us. 381 can have no refpect for them ; there can be no fuch Chap. 1 1, thing as an impenitent Faith : We fee by thefe things what a Faith tiiat is, by which we are juftified. Secondly, The next thing is, How we are juftified by Faith. Faith may be confidered under a double notion • cither as it refpe&s Chrifl, or as it refpecls the condition of the Gofpel : As it refpech Chnft,it unites us to him ; it makes us Members of his My- ftical Body; thus it is a Sacred Medium to have Chrift's Righteoufnefs imputatively become ours, that we may be juftified againft the Law ; nothing can juftifie us againft it but Chrift's Satisfaction ; that cannot do it unlefs it become ours ; ours it cannot be, unlefs we are Believers. Hence the Apoftle faith, That the Righteoufnefs of God is upon the Believer, Rom. 3. 22. That Chrift is the end of the Law for Righteoufnefs to the Believer, Rom. 10. 4. Here Faith doth not juftifie us in it felf , but in its objeft, Chrift; to whom it fo unites us, that his Righteouf- nels fo far becomes ours, as to juftifie us againft the Law. As it refpefts the Condition of the Gofpel, it is the very thing which that Condition calls lor ; in the Law of Works the Condition and the Precept were coextenfive ; the one was as large as the other ; no Man could live by that Law r , but he who had the perfect Obedience commanded in the Precept ; but in the Law of Grace it is otherwife. The Precept hath more in it than the Condition ; the Precept calls for Faith, n3t in its Truth only, but in its Statures and gradual Perfections ; it would have us afph e af- ter a mippVia, a fiducial Liberty, a <7rAH# now live in the old Adam , the head of Sin and v w'*V^> Death, any longer? or content himfelf in any ftate ihort of an Union with Chrift, in whom Righteouf- nefs and Life are to be had ? O how fhould we aft our Faith upon him, and give him the glory of his Righteoufnefs and Satisfaction by believing ? How fliould we venture our Souls, what ever our Debts are, upon the great Surety? Who paid the utmoft Farthing , and had a total difcharge in his Rcfurre- ction : How we fhould hide our felves in the Clefts of the Rock, in the precious wounds of Chrift as in a City of refuge ; where the avenging Law, fatis- fied therein , can never purfue and overtake us ? How willing fhould we now be, to have Chrift reign over us ? What ! hath he come from Heaven, and ia our flefh fulfilled all Righteoufnefs ; and by his obe- dience unto Death, even the death of the Crofs, fa- tisfied for our fins , and turned away the dreadful wrath due to the fame, and ihall he not Reign over us ? Hath he bore the heavy end of the Law ; the finlefs obedience which we could not perform, and the curfe ; which, if we had been under, would have funk us down into Hell for ever, and ihall he not Reign over us? when by a condefcending Law of Grace fuited to our frailty, he calls for nothing from us but fincerity : Oh! prodigious ingratitude! who would be guilty of it, or can be fo, that is a Belie- ver indeed I Let us therefore by Faith joyn our felves to Chrift, that we may be juftified by his Righteouf- nefs; and as a real proof of it, let us refign up our felves in fincere obedience to him; that having our fruit unto holinefs, we may have the end everlalting Life. Ddd CHAP. 3^0 Jn Holy Life Chap, i a. C H A P. XII. Touching an Holy Life :. It is not from Principles of Nature ; it is the fruit of a renewed \ regenerated heart; it iffues out of Faith and Love; it proceeds out of a pure intention towards the Will and Glo~ ry of God; it is humblejind dependant upon the in~ fluences of Grace ; it requires a ftncere mortificati- on of Sin without anySd\vo or exception; it ft and s in an exercife of all Graces; it makes a man holy in Ordinances^ alms ^profperity^adverfity^contr act s y calling; there is fuch an exercife of graces as cau- ,. feth them to grow : The conclufion of the Chap- ter. HAving treated of Juftification , Icome in the Laft place to fpeak of an Holy Life ; which is an infeparable companion of the other : Where Grace juftifies and pardons, there it heals; where Chrift is made Righteoufnefs, there he is made San- dification : thefe Twins of Grace can . never be part- ed; hut ye are fantlified , hut ye are juftifed , faith the Apoftle, i Cor. 6. n. Juftification and San&i- ftcation are ever in conjunction, as in God Juftice and Holinefs : In Chrift the Prieftly and Kingly Offices ; in the Gofpel the Promifes and the Pre- cepts ; and in the Sinner the Guilt and the Power of Sin are in Conjunction ; fo in Believers Juftifica- tion and Sanfrification are in Conjunftion : Were this Conjunction diffolved, the other could not well together confift; the perfon being Juftified and yet not. Sanctified : Gods Juftice muft fpare him, yet his Holinefs The EffeS of Faith and Love. 3^1 Holinefs mud hate him; Chnft muft fatisfie and Chap. ix. fave him as a Pried, yet not command him as a King : The Promifes muft fpeak comfort to him , yet are the Precepts broken by him ; the guilt of Sin muft be done away, yet the power and love of it mull remain; but none of thefe can ftand toge- ther, neither can Juftification Hand without Sandi- fication. An Holy life is a life feparate and confecrated un- to God; the life of Senfe is common to bruits; a life of Reafon is common to Men ; but a life of Holi- nefs is feparate and confecrated unto God ; the Epi- curean would frui came, enjoy the Flefh ; the Stoick would frui mente, enjoy his Mind and Reafon ; but the Holy Man would frui Deo, enjoy his God : The Jewifh Do&ors call God, CDlpQ , place, and the ho- ly Man makes him fuch ; he would not go out from God, or feek any other Being but in him ; he would not dwell in the barren Region of Self or Creatures, but in God the Fountain and Ocean of all goodnefs; his works are all w r rought in God ; his reft and cen- ter are only in his Will and Glory; he is not his own any longer. The great Titles of Creator and Redeemer proper to his God, w r ill not fuffer him to be fo ; it is no lefs than Sacriledge in his eyes* to be his own, or fo much as in a thought to fteal a- way ought from God, to whom his Spirit , Soul , Body, all is due ; his Reafon is not his own, as one w r ho knows it to be a borrowed light; he refigns it up to God the Father of lights , to be illuminated by him , and to the holy myfteries, to be ruled by them, without asking any why's or wherefores ; Thofe two words, Deus Dixit^ God faith, is Sa- Ddd z " tisfa&ioa 3^2- An Holy Life Chap. 1 2. tisfadtion enough to him ; his Will is not his own, v_/V^ it is not a Rule or Law to it felf. God is indeed fuch to himfelf ; but the Holy man will not per- verfely imitate God ; or like the Cum homo v*h ahqmd per Prince of Tyrus, fet his Heart as fropriam voluntatem, Deo aufert the Heart of God 7 Ezek. 28.2. quafi fuam Coronam. Anfel. de He will not {hatch at God's frmL cap. 8. Crown, or aflume his Glory; he knows that his Will was made to be fubjecl: to Gods, and in that fubje&ion (lands his Liberty and true Freedom x His will doth not {land upon its own bottom ; but refignes up it felf to his Grace to be made free indeed, and to his com- mands as the fupream Law ; his affections are not his own ; he fuffers them not to wander up and down among the Creatures ; there to gather Hay and Stubble , a falfe happinefs to himfelf ; but he difpatches them away iftto the other World , and makes them afcend up to God the true Center of Souls, and Fountain of Goodnefs ; he forrenders up his Soul and all to God; the Image of Heaven, which. is upon him, plainly tells him , that all is due to him who is above; to keep back part of the price or fubltracT: ought from him, is to lie to that Holy Spi- rit, who hath fet his {lamp upon every part of the new Creature, and by an Univerfal San<5tification fealed up the whole Man for his own : The life of an Holy Man is a life **t* e*ar r according to God. i Pet. 4.6. Itafpires after an Imitation oi the holy one; it complies with his holy commands, and in all aims at his glory as the fupream end of all. The Apoflle notably fets forth this Confecration of Man to God, they gave themf elves to the Lord^ 2 Cor.8.5^ They J be EfleEi Faith and Love. 2^2 1 h?y would be their own no longer. They furren- Chap. 1 x, dred up themfelves to God ; they dedicated them- ^w^Vx^ felves to his Will and Glory : All Chriftians, nay, al- moft all Men will at leaft feem to cry up an holy Life ; but that we may fee wherein it doth confift, I lhali fet down feveral things. Firft, An holy Life is not the product of our Na- tural Reafon and Will; that oiPelagius QA Deo ha- Aug. in Job, lemiis quod Homines fumw, a nobis ipfis quod jufti fu- Traff. 81,. mus ; That w r e are Men is from God, that we are juft Men is from our felves) is impium effaturn, a very wicked Saying, fuch as juftly grates upon the Ears of good Men; becaufe it utterly evacuates the Grace of Chrift: Its true, Reafon is a very excellent thing ;: it can dive into Nature, and bring up fome of the fecrets of it. It can teem out many Arts and Sci- ences ; it can meafure out Rules and Moral Vertues to Men ; but it cannot make a Man holy ; it can of it felf tell us,Tliat God is an Infinite, Wife, Juft, Good,, Superexcellent Being ; but after all is done,, it cannot raife up that Love to him, which is the Spring of art holy Life ; that Love is from God, and a fruit of the Holy Spirit. Bellarmine laies down this very fairly and roundly, Non poffe Deumjine ope iffius diligi t nc* De Grat. & que ut Authorem Natune, neque ut Largiterem Gra- Lib.Ar.L6* tice, neque perfeffe, neque imperfetle w/Umodo-; That c - 7* without the help of Grace we cannot love God, nei- ther as the Author of Nature, nor as the Giver of Grace, neither perfectly nor imperfectly any way : If Reafon cannot elevate our Love to God, then it cannot produce an holy Life, which is a fruit of that Love. Further, it may, having the Gofpel fet be- fore it, gather up a great ftock of Notions touching God, and Chrift, and the holy Commands in the Word* 3^4 An Holy Life Chap, u.' Word, and the incomparable Rewards in Heaven; but it cannot raife up holy Principles and Actions in -us ; if it could, then the very firft and rudeft draught of Pelagius, which made all Grace to confift in Do- ttrina & Liber o Arbitrio, muft be a very Truth ; then internal Grace, which renews the Soul, and rectifies the Faculties thereof, muft be a fancy needlefs and al- together fuperfluous ; its true, the Will in Man is a free Principle ; but to Divine objects it is not at all free till it be made fo by Grace : There is fuch zgra- vedo Libert Arbitrii, fuch a preflure of innate cor- ruption in it, that it cannot afcend above it felf to love God above all ; and dedicate the Life to him : Thus we fee, that an Holy Life is too high a thing to ifTue forth from meer Principles of Nature, when the Apoftle tells us, That Love, Joy, Peace, Long- fujfering, Gentlenefs, Goodnefi, Faith, Meeknefi, Tem- perance, are Fruits of the Spirit, Gal Hebr. 2. 1 1. Hence Camera obferves, that between De Ecckf, Chrift and Believers there is a wonderful Commu- **£• nion of Nature : Both have an humane Nature San- ctified by die Holy Spirit ; he was conceived by the Holv Spirit ; they are regenerated by it, that they may live unto God : but to make this point the clearer, I fliall confider the two parts of the new Creature ; that is, Faith, and Love : I call them fo, becaufe the Apoftle, who faith, Neither Circumcifion availeth any thing, nor uncircUmcifion, but a new Crea- turefial.6.1 y. faith alfo y Neither Circumcifion availeth, nor uncircumcifton, but Faith which worketh by Love r Gal. y. 6. intimating, that Faith and Love are two great parts of the new Creature : an holy Life flows* iromboth thefe;Hence fomeLearned Divines obfe^e, that the good Acts of Heathens have an eflential de- fect in them, the good Acts of Believers have only a gradual defect ; but the good Acts of Heathens have an eflential one ; in that they do not flow from Faith and Love, and fo cannot Center in the Glo- ry of God; Therefore St. Aufiin retracts that Retr. Jib.u Speech, wherein he faid , Philofophos virtutis luce cap 3. fulciffe , that the Philofophers did fhine with the light of virtue : But to fpeak diftinctly of thefe two Graces. Firft, An Holy Life iflues out of Faith ; an holy- Life is virtually in Faith, and proceeds actually from it ; Faith &qs the commands of God to be, as they are, richly Engraven with the Stamps and Signa- tures of Divine purity and equity ; fucli as Proclaim that God is in them of a truth, and that they are the very Counterpains of his Heai t ; and from, hence ifc 402 An Holy Life Chap, i x. it preiTes the Believer unto obedience, and fecretly dictates, that thefe are the very Will of God, and mull be done ; Thy word is very pure, therefore thy Servant loveth it : Saith David^ PJaL 119. 140. The Emphatical [ therefore ] in the Text cannot be practically underitood by any thing but Faith ; the Carnal Mind, which is enmity to God, would argue from the purity of the command to the hatred ot it ; but Faith, fuch is its Divine Genius , argues from thence to Love and Obedience. It doth not only point out the Divine Authority which is ftampt up- on the command, but fhew the purity and re&itude which is there to attract us into our duty ; and that we may do it in a free filial manner. Faith de- rives a free Spirit from Chrift to make obedience eafie and natural to us ; a Man with his old Heart drudges in the ways of God, and brings forth du- ties as the Bond-woman did her Son, in a dead Ser- vile manner ; but when Faith comes, the commands are eafie ; and the Will is upon the Wheel, ready to move fweetly and ftrongly in compliance thereun- to : The Believer is Spirited and tiqw Natured for Obedience •> his Heart is in a pofture to do the Will of God ; every where Faith finds Arguments and Impulfives for it : Doth it look upon the Life of Chrift ? it immediately concludes , thefe are the fleps of our dear Lord, and fhall we not follow him ? After whom {hall we walk if not after him ? It's true he walked in pure finlefs perfeftion , fuch as we cannot reach; but the gracious Covenant hath {loop- ed to our frailty, and made us fure that fincenty will be aceepted, and how can we deny it, or refufe to comply with fuch condefcending Grace ? Doth it look upon Chriits wounds and bloody Death ? thefe 'The EffeSi of Faith and Love. 403 tliefe will call frame and confufion upon an unho Chap, n, ly life : May any one imagine that our Saviour bore K ~^V~^ the Curfe and Wrath of God, that we might provoke it ; or expiated our fins at fo deaj a rate, as Ins own Blood and Life, that we might indulge them ? who fees not now that Sin isbloody,and hohnefs amiable ? and what eafie terms are propofed to us, when the Death and Curfe was only Chrift's, and the fincere Obedience is all that is required to be ouks ? Doth it look up for the Spirit, the purchafe of Chrift's death ? We well know where that is to be found : the more we walk in the holy Commands and ways of God, the more are we like to have of the gales and Divine comforts of it ; while we are obeying and doing the Will of God, that Spirit will ufher in afliftances and. Heavenly confolations upon us ; to give us an experi- mental proof of that Promife,That the Holy Spirit is given to them that obey him : doth it look within the v ail, to the Rivers of pleafures and plenitudes of joy in Heaven, where pious Souls fee Truth in the original, and drink good at theFountain head? Nothing is more obvious than this, that an holy Life is the true way thither ,* who can rationally think that he can carry the blots and turpitudes of an impure Life into fuch a place,or that any thing lefs than fincereObedience can make him meet to enjoy God and holy Angels there? nothing can-be more vain than fuch an imagination ; as fare as Heaven is Heaven, an holy Life mult be the way thither : Thus we fee what a mighty influence Faith hath into Holinefs; hence Ignatius faith, «?# &*Il come upon them, as it were per accident ; Ins Mind is not towards them, as it is towards thole which ferve him fpiritually : A Man's Life cannot be holy prarterintentionally, or by accident : it is a pure In- tention which fpiritualizes and fan&ifies the Life be- fore God. To clear this, it is to be confidered, That the Life muft be dedicated to God in a double refpeft ; it muft be dedicated to him by a conformity to his Will. ;\nd again, It muft be dedicated to him by a tendency to his Glory. In both thefe there muft be a pure intention to direft the fame. The firft tiling is, There muft be a pure Intention in our conformity to the Will of God. Socinus faith, That there is a Verbum quoddam interim, a kind of internal word in Man ; that is, a Reafon to difcern between that which is juft, and that which is unjuft : TrxkcL And then he x\dds, He that obeys this internal word, Theol. c. z. obeys God himfelf, Etiamfi ipfum Deum non effe qui- dem autfciat aut cogitet ; although he do not know or think that there be a God. And after concludes, That fuch an Obedience is grateful to God : But as great an Admirer of Holinels as this Heretick would feem to be, it was no lefs than a prophane Ailertion, to fay, That there might be a grateful Obedience without any refpect at all had to God, or his Will. Doth not St. Paul condemn in the Athenians the worihip of an unknown God ? Doth not Chrift charge the Samaritans , that they did worfliip they knew not what ? Yet thefe are the portent a opinionum^wliioh F f f 2 this 4_o 8 dn Holy Life Chap, i x. this Mafter of Reafon vents to the World : But to pafs over this ; It is not enough for an holy Life, that the thing done be materially good ; but it muft be therefore done, becaufe God commands it fo to be ; an holy Man follows after Holinefs, becaufe this is the Will of God. Now that the material gpodnefs of a thing is not enough, may appear by tiiefe Ii> fiances. Jehu in deflroying the Houfe of Ahab did do that which God commanded him to do ; yet God faith, That he will avenge that Blood upon the Houfe of Jehu, Hof i . 4. And why fo ? Jehu did that which God commanded, but he did not obey in it ; he did it not in compliance with God's command, but in purfuance of his own defign ; as it is with the hand of a ruily Dial which ftands ilill (fuppofe) at ten of the Clock, to a Traveller pafiing at that hour it feemeth to go right, but it is but by accident ; fo was it with Jehu. He feemed to obey in that which hit with his own Will; but he did it not upon the account of God's; tor then lie would have done other things. But though hedeflroyed AhaFs Houfe, yet he did not deflroy the Calves at Dan and Bethel. For there God's Will did not fall in with his. Another Inflance we have in the acts of Moral Virtue in the Heathen ; thofe a£ts were materially good, yet they did not in them ierve God , but their own Reafon : It's true, right Reafon fignifies the very Will of God ; but they did , them not in compliance with Reafon,as fignificative of God's Will; but in compliance with it as a chief part of themfelves. This is evident upon: a double account ; the one is this, That they were animals of Glory* They did what they did, not in an humble fabjeclion to the Will of God, but in a proud fclf- dorying way; they arrogated all the praife arc] honour. The Lffett ef Faith and Love. 40^ honour to themfelves; in all they did but facnfice Chap. ix. to the pride of their own Ileafon. The other is this, ^-^V^-^. They did not only follow right Ileafon in their Moral Vermes , but corrupt Ileafon in their Ido- latries : The Apoftle faith, Their foolifh Heart was darbied, Rom. 1. 21. Here they followed Ileafon as a part of their corrupt felf ; which thofe, who follow it as fignificative of God's Will, cannot be fuppofed to do : Right Ileafon, which imports God's Will, was againft their Idolatries ; yet they continued in them. Hence it appears, that in their Moral Ver- mes they did not ferve God, but their own Rea- fon. Hence St. Aujlin contends, that their Vermes j?£* &* were not true Vertues. They might be juft, fober, merciful; but they did all infidelitcr, without re- fped^to the Will and Glory of God ; Male honumfa- Cam ^ ^ cit 9 qui infideliter facit. Hence, as Camero obferves, 3^6, Lucretia hated Immodefty, and Cato Perfidioufnefs; not out of love to God , but becaufe thofe things were incongruous to Reafon. Another Inftance we have in Carnal Profeflbrs under the Gofpel ; they hear, read, pray, give Alms ; but they do not do thefe fpiritually,in compliance with the Will of God ; the Duties are high, but the aims in them are low and carnal: Vaft is the difference between an Holy and a Carnal Man : An Holy Man is holy even Natural and Civil Actions ; the Kingdom of Heaven is by a pure Intention brought -down into his Trade : Nay, into his very Meat and Drink. His deeds are by a Prerogative wrought in God: when he toils as a Servant in fervile Employment, yet he ferves the Lord Chrift ; all is fpiritualized by a pure Intention, But on the other hand, a Carnal Man is carnal evea in fpiritual Aclaons. There is indeed the Opus of. ■ rat . 410 An Holy Life Chap, i z. rat urn ; the Flelh, the outward body of a Duty ; but there is no Soul or Spirit in it. No pure Intention to carry it up to the Will and Glory of God, to which it is confecrated. Thus we fee, that it is not enough for an holy Life that the thing done be materially good: No; it muft be done in compliance to the Divine Will : / will keep the Commandments of my God, faith Davids Pfal. 119. 115;. He would keep them, not upon any by-account, but becaufe they were God's, to whofe Will he dedicated himfelf. Lo, I come to do thy Will, God, faith our Saviour, Hebr. 10. 7. And again, Ifeek not my own Will, but the Will of the Father, which hath fen t me, Joh.f.jo. Here we have the great Pattern of Holinefs ; his Will was devoted and fwallowed up in God's : all that he did and fuffered was in conformity to the Divine Will. We muft not dream of any true Holinefs, till we do what good we do, out of compliance with the Divine Will,- as in matters of Faith we muft be- lieve, quia Deus dixit ; fo in matters of Practice we muft obey, quia Deus voluit : Hi's Command muft fway andcaft the Balance in Heart and Life; the Nature of holy Obedience is this, to do what God willeth, intuitu voluntatis, becaufe he willeth it: And hence an holy Man doth not pick and chufe a- mong the commands of God, but carry a refpedt to all of them. The next thing is this : There muft be a pure In- tention to direct our good Actions to the Glory of God : feing God is Alpha, he muft be Omega ; fee- ing he is the Supream good, he muft be the Ultimate end of all things. Nothing can be more rational than this, That a Creature fhould be referred to its Crea- tor; that a finite good Jhould run and do homage to The Effect of Faith and Love. 41 1 1 ..I — — — — to an Infinite one; nothing can be more abfurdand Chap. n. inordinate than this, That a Creature fhould be a ^/"VX^ center to it felf, or ihould be loved or enjoyed for it felf; or that God,the mod excellent Being, ihould be made but a Medium, or fhould be loved or ufed for fome other thing.This is praftically toblafpherne, and fay, God is not God, there is fomething better than he to be loved and enjoyed for it felf. When the Angels would Hay at home, and/;*/// Je/pjis, enjoy themfelves, they became Devils, and loft all then- glory in a moment. All things therefore muft be re- ferred unto God; his Glory muft be the fupifam End; to this Angels fly with Eagles wings ; to this holy- Men walk ; to this irrational Creatures by a fecret Inftinft are carried; to this Devils, Will they, nili they, muft be drawn ; this is the great End of all things ; for a rational Creature not to aim at this, is againft Nature and Reafon ; the want of this made an ellential defeat in the Moral Vermes of the Pagans ; here they fall ihort ; They did not in them aim at the glory of God. This appears in divers things : they at the beft made Vertue but pretiumfui, the Reward of it felf for the honefty which was in it. But they looked no further to the glory of God, as they ought; they looked on themfelves as the chieFobjed: of their Love ; and fo this Love never afcended to God ; they boafted and gloried in their Vertues, as meerly then- own, and never faw any center but themfelves ; they did not therefore aim at the glory of God in them. Hence St. Auft'm, who pronounces them no true Ver- tues, faith, That true Vertues are to be difcerned, ®"*r. J h non officiisjcdfinibus ; not by the Work it felf, but by '• 4- the end; and that their Vertues were good only tn officio^ ^i 2 An Holy Life Chap. 12. officio, in the work done ; not in fine, in a right end: v^^rv^ And that not only the Epicureans, who woujd talte AugMVerh. f Carnal Pleafures; But the Stoicks, who would fet jifofi. Serm. up Right Rea f on> did live after the Y [ t {h ; their Ver- tues were referred to themfelves,and that was corrupt Flefli ; they were no longer Vermes, but pieces of Pride and Preemption. Virtutes , faith the fame De Civ. Dei Author, cum adfeipfas refer untur, inflate &fuperba? 7.19. (7.25-. funt, Vermes if referred to themfelves, are proud and blown up with their own excellency. Julianas the Aaft.contr. Pelagian, was fo far convinced of this, that he laid, Jul 1.4.. e.g. Xhey werefter/liter boni, becaufe they ad:ed not for God : their Vermes would do them no good in ano- ther World; inallreafon, thofe Vermes which are not referred to God as the ultimate End, cannot pof- fibly have any thing of Holinefs in them. They can- not be holy without a confecration to God ; and that cannot be without a pure Intention towards his glory. It is not therefore enough for an holy Life to have Moral Vertues, but we mufl: fearch our Hearts, and fee what our end is ; what forms are in Naturals, that the end is in Morals, As the Man thinketh,fo is he. Prov. 2 3. 7. Mens cujufque id eft qui/que, The Man is as his Mind is, and his Mind is as his End is ; though the End be extrinfecafto the Aft in genere entis, yet it is eflential to it in genere moris ; the Ad: cannot be holy, unlefs the end be fo : Hence the A- poftle tells us, That whatfoever we do, all mufl be done to the Glory of God, 1 Cor. 10. 3 1. The Jewifb Rabbins fay the fame, That whatever we do, muft be done htNomine Dei, in the Name of God : an Aft not dedicated to that great End, is cut off and fepa- rate from its center. And upon that account it is not Holy The Effeft of Faith and Love. 4 1 3 holv, but common and profane ; no lefs a nullity in Chap. u. Spirituals than a Creature, if cut off from God the ^s^V^y Fountain of Being, would be in Naturals: Hence St. Auft'in tells us, That which is good in officio, may yet be fin in fine ; For, as £&ce[uidkmifit 9 & non the Schools (peak, Finis dat fpeciem in propurbocfaropter^uod Moralibus. Thofe Arts which are good £ r \£^\°fZ Z m the matter of them , may be utterly ehfinepeccatum eft, Con- marred by perverfe Intention: It be- trajul.1.4. c. 3. comes us than to look to the fcope of our Aftions. Our Saviour Chart, the great Exem- plar of Sanftity, tells us, That he fought not his own Glory, but his Father s, Job. 8. jo. compared with fob. j. 18. He was Deus de Deo, God of God; the Eternal Creator ; yet as he was in forma fervi, in the form of a Servant, a Man in time, he fought not his own Glory, but his Father's. We fee here what is the Defign of an holy Life ,• it is that God may be glorified : our Holinefs fhould fhine as a little Beam or Spark from the Holy one; the drops and meafures of Mercy in us fhould point out that infinite Ocean of Mercy which is in him : We fhould by our Obe- dience tell the World, that God is Supream, and by our fincerity teftifie, that he is omnilcient, and pre- fent every where ; we fhould ftudy how to ferve the Intereft of the BlefTed God, how to fhew forth his Praife, how to unfold his Glory in an holy righteous, humble, heavenly Converfation ; (till there ihould be Oculus in met am, a pure Intention at the Glory of God: If we are by a pure Intention joyned to that great End, then our Works will be fpirituahzed ; our Holinefs will never fee corruption; there will be be a kind of Immortality in every go vi A<5tion : but if we are off from that great End, our Holinefs perilhes, Ggg or 414 dn Holy Life Chap. ii. or rather is none at alL There is a worm at the ^OTn^ Root 5 one bafe, low, inferiour End or other putrifies the good Work, and makes it moulder into nothing, When the Woman in the Revelations was ready to be delivered, the Dragon flood before her to devour her Child, but it was caught up to God and his Throne, Ncrimb. de A devout Papijl glofles it thus ; Wloen ive bring %&J)fau forth our good Works, Satan ftands before us to de- vour them by one falje Intention or other, and will cer- tainly do it, unlefi by. a pure one they be caught up to God and his Glory. Another expoftulates thus, Quid juvat bonorum operum prolem gignere, & earn per In~ tentionis depravationem necare ? What profits it to be- get a progeny of Good Works, and to kill it by a depraved Intention? A Man, who wants a right Intention, murders his befl progeny. The Church therefore tells us, That all her fruits were laid up for Ghrijl, Cant. 7. 1 3. Propter te, Domine, propter te^ is the holy Man's Motto ,• all his good Works are by a pure Intention confecrated unto God: When an Hypocrite doeth good Works,the center and compafs ot all is himfelf only ; and upon that account, thofe Works are not good in the Eyes of God : But when a Saint doeth good Works, they fall into God's Bofoin,. and center in his Glory, To conclude ; Where pure Love adheres to God as the Supream Good, there a pure Intention will dedicate the Life to his Glory, as. the ultimate End ; then and not before may we call the Life holy. Fourthly, An holy Life is humble and dependant upon the influences of God's Spirit and Grace. Hence the Apofllc bids us, Work out our Salvation with fear and trembling, Phil. 2. 12. That is, with all humi- lity: And the Reafon is added , For God worketh to wJ/L The Effect of Faith and Love. 41 5 will, and to do of his good pleajure, verf.i ]. which Chap. 12. would be no Reafon at all, if we couid itarrd upon ^Y\^ our own bottom,and-work out our Salvation without any dependance upon that Grace, which worketh the Will and the Deed : But if, as the reafon tells us, God works theWill and the deed of his good pleafure, then we have all the reafon in the World to work it out with fear and trembling ; as knowing our de- pendance upon God and his Grace. Again ; The A- poflle faith of himfelf, / laboured more abundantly than they all; yet not I, but the Grace of God, which was with me, 1 Cor. 15-. 10. Obferve his great cau- tion ; he afcribes nothing to himfelf, 'but all to Grace, He faid indeed, /laboured; yet he piouflly retraces it, faying, yet not I, but the Grace of God. He afcri- bes all to Grace , becaufe in all his labours he was in an humble dependance upon it, as being that with- out which he could do nothing. This note of an holy Life doth alfo {hew, that the Moral Vertues of the Heathens were not right : they were indeed wife, fober, juft, merciful ; but what was their pofture in their doing thefe things ? how did they crow, and reflect upon themfelves, and cry up their own Reafon and Will, as the only Fountains of Vertue ? The Phi- losopher, faith Epicletus, expefts all *J%Uvt* from him- £ nc fr t Cm T - felf. Deorum immortalium munus eft, quod vivimur, Philofophice, quod bene vivimus, Our Lite is from the Epift. 90. Gods ; but, which is greater than Life, our Vertue is from Philofophy. Thus Seneca, their Virtuofo, could vie perfection with God himfelf: Hoc eft quod Epift. 48, Philojophia mihi promittit, ui me par em Deo facia t, faith Seneca : Philofophy was to make him equal to God. Nay, there is a (train higher ; Eft a liquid, quo Epifi. 5-3. Sapiens antecedet Deum, ilk Nature benejicio, non Ggg z Juo, 4 1 6 An Holy Life Chap, i z. fuo r fapiens eft, faith he ; There is fomething wherein Vw>o/-^y a wife Man hath the precedence of God : God is God by Nature, but the wife Man is fo by his Reafon and Will. They fcorned that Vertue fhould be Res bene- ficiarivty a thing precarious or dependant upon the Grace of God ; they would have it to be meerly and Di Nattsm entirely their own. Virtutem nemo unquam accept am jDeor.. Deo retulit, nimirum re lie propter virtutem jure lau- Aamur ; in virtute recle gloriamur ; quod non con tin- geret, ft id donuma Deo, non a nobis haberemus, thus Cicero ; No Man ever thank' t God for being vertuous; for Vertue we are juftly praifed, in Vertue we rightly glory ; which we could not do if it were from God, and not from our felves i And may we call this Ho- linefs ? No farely ; it's horrible Impiety, and defpe- rate Pride, for them thus to lift up themfelves, and dethrone God the great Donor. The Angels by re- flecting on their own excellencies in a thought, were turned into Devils : And, I confidently lay it, Ver- tues, which by a proud reflex are turned back upon themfelves, lofe their Nature ; being altogether in- dependant upon God, the Fountain ol goodnefs, they are no longer Vertues, but Fancies and Nullities. A proud Seli-fubfiiler is a Man in a pofture as crofs to the Gofpel as poffibly can be : the tumor in his Heart makes him uncapable of that Grace which is given to the humble ; the Self-fufficiency there makes it impoffible for him to live by Faith, as the Juft do ,* he depends not on God's Grace, and how can he live to his Glory ? he is all to himfclf, and what can God* p r ■ be to him ? Some Pagans, faith St. Auft'm, would P f al. ri not be Chriftians, quia fufficiunt fibi de bona vita fua, becaufe they could live well of themfelves : If a Man can ft&nd upon his own bottom, and work out of his owa The Effefl of Faith a?id Love. 41 7 ownftock, to what purpofe are Chrift and Grac£? Chap. 12. if he may be a Principle and End to himfelf, what need he go out of his own Circle ? Such a Man as this, is an Idol to himfelf, fraught with Vanity and hor- rible Prefumption; but utterly void of God and an holy Lite. I fhall fay no more to this : An holy Life is a Life of dependance ; the Jufl or holy Man lives by Faith; he looks to God, andisfaved; he waits till Mercy come ; he commits himfelf to God and his Grace ; he leans and rolls upon him, as not bear- ing up his ow r n w r eight ; he calls his burden on him, as being too much for himfelf. He gives himfelf to the Lord, refigning up all his property in himfelf,that God may be all in all ; ftill he is in dependance up- on him : He moves but under the Firlt Mover ; he acts but under the great Agent; when he fails to- wards Heaven, he looks for the holy gales ; when he fow r s precious Seed, he waits for the Heaven- ly dews and Sun-beams : Still he depends upon Grace. In the 1 1 9. Pfal. where we have the breath- ings of Vital Religion, David admirably fets forth, how in all his holy actings he did depend upon God : Thou hafl commanded lis to keep thy Precepts ; hut O that my ways were di reeled to do fo, verf 4, S? y . I will keep thy Statutes ; but forfake me not Wtterly, verfS. With my whole Heart have I fought thee, but let me not wander from thy Commandments, verf. 10. I will run the way of thy Commandments, but do thou enlarge my Heart, verf 32. / love thy Pre- cepts ; but quicken- me, Lord, according to thy loving kindnefs, .verf 15 g, I have chef en thy Precepts ; let thine Hand help me, verf 1 7 3 .:, We fee here the true Picture of an holy Life : It is working and depend- ing ; it is Obedience and Influence in Conjunction. The holy Man very well knows, that the new Crea- ture. 41 8 An Holy Life Chap, i *l. ture, though it be in it felf an excellent thing, and ^y^T^J more worth than the Soul it fell', is defectible, and cannot Hand alone, or fubfift without a Divine con- courfe : it was breathed out from God ; and, with- out his continual fpirations to fupport it, it will va- nifh into nothing; ihould God tell him, That he ihould ftand alone, and upon his own bottom; he would, though richly furniflied with divine Graces, fall into an Agony , and be ready to fink into de- fpair; his Heart would immediately fugged to him, that he might, with David , roll in Adultery and Blood; or, with Peter, deny the Lord Chrift; or, with Julian, turn total, final Apoftate, were he left in the hand of his own counfel ; he knows he might do any thing which hath been done by others. St. Auftin brings in one ipeakingthus; Non mult a peccavi, I have finned little, yet love much : And then an- fwers thus ; Tu dicis te non mult a commijjifte : Quare > Horn, 23. q m regent e ? Hoc tlbt die it Deus tuus, Regelam te lorn. 10. mihi, Jervaham te mihi, agnofce gratiamejus, cui de- les & quod' non admifi/li ? Thou fay 'ft, That thou haft not finned much : Why? who ruled thee ? Thy God faith to thee, I ruled thee, I preferved thee ; acknowledg then hisGrace,to which thou oweft even this, That thou haft not finned as others. The holy Man is very fenfible, that unlefs God bear him up with his Grace, he fhall foon fink into all manner of fin. Hence that of Luther, Vita hominis nihil aliud eft nifi oratio, gemitus, defiderium, fufpirium ad mifericordiam Dei : Our Life Ihould be a perpetual breathing after that Grace of God, upon which we depend : Were we full of divine Light, yet if we iliould ihut the windows, and go about to poflefs it in a Sclt-fubfiftence, we Ihould foon be in the dark, arid 7 he EffeSi of Faith and Love. 4 1 Conci'.pifcere nolo, & concupijeo, faith the Fa- Temp. Sew?, ther ; Innate corruption will be furring and bubling 45. up in us ; all that can be done on Earth, is to war and fight againft it ; the Triumph, the Crow r n of fin- lefs Perfection can be found no where but in Heaven. But to clear this. Particular, I ihall fet down two things. The one is this : A Man, who indulges or allows fin in himfelf, cannot, while he doth fo, lead an holy Life : he hath no Principles for it ; no Principle of Repentance ; he cannot mourn over fin, while he joys in it f he cannot hate fin, w T hile he loves it ; he can- not forfeke fin, while he follows after it. No Prin- eipleof Faith ; lie cannot trull in God's Mercy ,when he rebels,, and is in Arms againft him ; he cannot re- ceive the Lord Chrift, when he hath another Ma- iler to rule over him ; he cannot clofe in with the precious Promifes of the Gofpel, w r hen he embraces the lying Promifes of Sin. No Principle of Holy- Love ; he cannot truly love God, with an Idol in his Heart ; he cannot love him, and clofe in with fin his great Enemy; he cannot love him, and habitually, willingly violate his Commands: Such an one can have no pure Intention towardsGod's Will or Glory : not towards God's Will ,• he obeys with ufalvo or ex- ception ; he picks and chufes among the Divine Com- mands; he complies only with thofe Commands which The EffeSt of Faith and Love. 423 which crofs not his darling LufL The Jcwijh Fab*- Chap, n bins fay ; He that faith, I receive the whole Law, except one word only, defpifes the Command of God. The fame Divine Authority is upon all the Commands ; and that Obedience, which is with the exception of one Command which erodes the in- dulged Luft, is as none at all : Nor yet towards God's Glory : How can he glorify God , who by willful finning difhonours him ? or how can he aim at that Glory, who aims at the fatisfa&ion of his own Luft ? or which way can one promote two fuch contrary ends,as that Glory, and his own Satista&ion ? Heaven and Hell, Light and Darknefs, Holinefs and Impu- rity may as foon be reconciled, as two fuch contrary ends can meet together. Every indulged Luft is one Idol or other; either it is Baal, Pride and Lorlinefs, or Afhtaroth^NcdXxh and Riches, or Vemis, carnal and fenfual pleafure,or Mauzz'im^oxct and earthly Power; unlefs the Idol be put away, we cannot ferve God in in an holy Life. The other thing is this : It is of high concern to an holy Life to mortify Sin. An holy Man is one in Covenant with God ; therefore he mull; maintain war againft Sin, the Enemy of God ; Sin is an oppofite to God, a rebellion againft his Sovereignty, a contra- diction to his Holinefs, an abufe to his Grace, a pro- vocation to his Juftice, a difparagement to his Glory; and how can an holy Man, a Friend of God do lefs than fet himfelf againft it, that he may kill and utterly de- ftroy it ? Ye that love the Lord, hate evil, faith the Pfalmifl, PfaL 97. 10. The Exhortation is pregnant with excellent Reafon : If you do indeed love God, who is Purity, Power, Wifdom, Excellency it felf; ye can do no lefs than hate Sin, which is Pollution, Hhh z ' Weafc- 424 4* Holy Life Cbap. 12. Wcaknefs, Folly, and Vilenefs ; and if you do hate J^\TSJ it, you will leek the utter mine and extirpation of it : an holy Man is one in union with Chrift, and upon that account he muft mortify Sin : in Chrift crucified he hath a pattern of Mortification; what was done ro his pure Flefh in a way of Expiation, muft be done to our corrupt Flefh in a way of Mortification. The Nails which faftned him to the Crofs, tell us, that our corruption mult have fuch a reftraint upon it, that it may, like one on a Crofs, be difabled to go forth into thofe acts of fin which it is propenfe un- to ; the piercing and letting out his Heart-blood, ihews as that the Old Man muft not only be reftrain- ed, but pierced ; that the vital Blood, the internal love of fin may be let out of the Heart ; he was active in his Paflion ; he freely laid down his Life,yet violence was done to. him 5 in like manner we muft freely fa- crifice our Lufts ; we muft willingly die to fin, yet fin muft not die a Natural Death, but a violent one; it muft be ftabb'd at the heart, and die of its wounds : And, becaufe it will not die all at once, it muft by little and little kmguilh away till it give up the Ghoft; there muft be Mortification upon Mortification, be- caufe fin is long a dying. But further we have from Chrift not an Examplar of mortification only, but a Spirit and Divine Power for the Work , while by Faith we converfe about the wounds of Chrift ; We have that Spirit from him, which mortifies the deeds of the Body r Rom. 8. 13. That mind of Chrift which makes us fuffer in the Flefh, ceafing from fin, That ive may no longer live to the Luji.s of Men, hut to the Will of Ccrl r 1 Pet. 4. 1 , & 2. If then the holy Man will live like himfelf, and as becomes a Member of Chrift, he muft by that Vertue and Spirit, which he . bath The EffeSt of Faith and Love. 4.25 hath from him, crucify his Lulls and Corruptions : Chap. n. Thus the Apoille, They that are Chuffs, have cru- ^/W.^ cified the Fiejh with the Affellions and Lujis^ GaL f % 24. They ought to crucify them ; they do crucify them fo far, that fin can reign no longer ; they go on crucifying ever}- day more and more, that the body of fin may be destroyed. Moreover, An holy Man hath fuch a Divine Faith, as blafts all the World in companion of Heavenly things ; in the Eyes of Faith, Earthly Riches are not the true ones : thofe Treafures which glitter fo much to Senfe,are but poor moth-eaten things ; the World's fubftance is but a ihadow, an apparition, a thing that is not ; too low for an immortal Soul to aim at ; too mean to enrich the inward Man ; the fenfual plca- fures which ravilh Flelh and Blood, are but the vain titillations of the outward Man ; Momentary things ; foch as periih in the ufing, and die in the embraces, leaving nothing behind them but a fling and worm in the Confcience of the poor voluptuary. Mun- dane Glories, which take carnal Men lb much, appear to be but a blafl; a little popular Air : to a Man up among the Stars, the whole Earth would be but a fmall thing; and to a Man who by Faith converfes in Heaven, Earthly Crowns and Scepters are no better. Now when Sin, which ufes to wrap up it fclf in one piece of the World or other, is Waited in its Covers and DrelTes of apparent Good; when thofe ■ Pomps and Fancies of the World, which ufually paint and cover Sin, to render it eligible untoMen,are difco- vered by Faith to be but vanities and empty Nothings, Sin will be loved ho longer: nay, it wiil look accord- ing to its own hue like a vile, bafe, deformed thing, lit for nothing but to be hung upon a Crofs 5 there to die 42^ An Holy Life Chap. i%. die and expire. Hence it appears, that an holy Man as long as his Faith difcovers a vanity and nothing- nefs inthefaireft profpectsoftheWorld, muft needs overcome the World, and the lulls of it. Again, An holy Man, according to that fupernatural Confecra- tion which is upon him, furrenders up his Love, and Joy, and Delight to God and Chrift and Heavenly things ; the ftream of his Heart,which before run out upon the lying vanities here below, is now turned to the excellent things above ; his Converfation is in Heaven ; his Treafure and his Heart are both there ; and then what muft become of Sin ? muft it not needs die away, and become as a Body without a Spirit in it ? It is the Love, and the Joy, and the Delight of Man which animate Sin ; but if thefe are not her e any longer, but rifen and gone away into the upper World, to place and center themfelves upon the ex- cellent objects which are there, then Sin muft needs languifh and die away ; it hath nothing to animate or enliven it any more: were this Divine furrender in perfection, Sin could not fo much as be ; and propor- tionably where it is but in truth only, Sin muft needs grow heartlefs and powerlefs. Notable is that of the Apoftle, Walk in the Spirit^ i.e. in the Elevations of holy Faith and Love, and ye jhall not fulfill the lufls of flejbj Gal. y. 16. Sin fhall grow weak, and by little and little give up the Ghoft. To conclude this Character ; An holy Man, which way foever he looks, {qcs juft reafon to mortify Sin ; the reftitude of the Law faith, It muft die for its crookednefs and ataxy : the threatning of Death faith, It muft die , or the Soul muft die in the room of it. The bleed ingWounds of our dying Lord fay,That the Crucifier muft not be fpared,but die after that manner. That The Effe& of Faith and Love. 427 That excellent Gueit, the holy Spirit, faith, It is too Chap.j z. vile a thing to live under the fame roof with it felf. ' The precious immortal Soul faith, The wounds and turpitudes of it are too intolerable to be endured any longer. Heaven, that blefled Region, faith. It is not to be tolerated by any who mean to enter into that place: We muft then mortifie the deeds of the Body , that voe may live, Rom.S.i], that we may live a Life of Holinefs here, and a Life of Glory in another World. Sixthly, An holy Life is not made up of the Exer- cife of this or that Grace in particular; but of the Exercife of all Graces, pro h/c & nunc, as occafion ! ferves. St. Peter faith, That we muft add to our Faith Vertue r to Vertue Knowledge, to Knowledge Tempe- rance, to Temperance Patience,, to Patience Godlinefs,, to Godlinefs Brotherly kindnejs, and to Brotherly kind- nefs Charity, 2 Pet.i. 5, 6, 7. Holy Men, who are partakers of the Divine Nature,fpoken of immediate- ly before, have Grace upon Grace ; and muft, as oc- cafion ferves, exercife one after another , that there may be a Conftellation of Graces appearing in their, Lives, to give the more full refemblance of the Per- fections which are in their Father in Heaven; our Saviour Chrift ( in whom all Graces are fet forth in lively and Orient colours, and are really and practi- cally exemplified to our view) had this character jufl> ly given him, he went up and down down doing good ':. every ftep one odour ot Grace or other brake forth, from him : Subjection to Parents or Magi Urates, or Zeal towards God, or Humility in walhing his Di-> fciples feet, or Meeknefs under falfe Accufations, or. melting Compaffions letting out cures on the Bodies and. Heavenly truths on the Souls of Men, or adrni* cable: 428 An Holy Life Chap. 1 x. rable Patience under great forrows and fiiflerings ; one glorious way of Holinefs or other was always coming from him : Proportionally, an holy Man, Who is a living Member of Chriflynufl be in Ins mea- fure holy in all manner of Converjation, 1 Pet. 1 . 1 5-. In the Origin?! it is, ci»^«f^e^?j which way fo- ever he turn himfelf, he mull: be holy in it : he mud have a refpect to God at every turn ; this will belt ap- pear by the particular parts of his Life. Take an holy Man in Divine Ordinances, there he is holy : He would firft be fure that he is in a right Church, and in a right Ordinance; in a right Church; for there the Lord commands the Ble/ling, ^even Life for evermore ; in a right Ordinance, for unlefs the Inftitution be from God, the Benediction cannot be expe&ed from him.: and then he would ferve God in a right manner, and fan&ify his Name in his approaches ; when he comes to an Ordinance, he hath high thoughts of God , as being the Infi- nite Majefty of Heaven, the Excellency of all Per- fections ; one whom Angels adore,and Devils tremble at : accordingly he lies low before God ; he ferves him with Reverence and godly Fear ,• he draws nigh to him, yet forgets not the infinite diftance between them ; he blulhes to think that lie muft go before fo pure a Majefty, with the dull of Mortality about him : and again he blulhes to think, that he mull do fo in the fpots and rags of many Infirmi- ties, which being in the Soul are much more aba- five than thofe in the Body. The Beams of the Divine Glory ftrike an holy awe into him, and make him conclude, That a Soul, though entirely given up, is to God but a little, very little tiling ; but as a Beam to the Sun, or a drop to the Ocean ; and, which The Efeft of Faith and Love. 42^ which is matter of more ihame and abafement ; the Chap. 1*. Soul is much lefs, in that the innate corruption holds back, and the bewitching World deals away a great deal of it from God : very little or rather nothing it is, that we can give to him; however the holy Man, fuch is his Divine temper, would not abate am thing, but endeavour in Ordinances to give God his Spirit and highed Intention ; he knows that God is a Spirit, and meer bodily worfhip is as nothing to him : what is the bowing of the Knee, when there is an Iron Si- new of Rebellion within ? or the lifting up of the Hands orEyes,when there is an earthly depreifion up- on the affe&ions? towhat purpofe is an open Ear,when the Heart is deaf and jhut up againd holy Truths ? And what a fttadow, a meer lye in worihip is the Body, when the Mind is dole away and gone after Vanity ? He therefore fets himfelf to ferve God in fpirit and truth; while God is fpeakingto him in his Sacred Word, he would have no converfe at.all with worldly objects; he bids thefc dand by, and not in- terrupt his attention, while he is fpeaking to God in prayer ; he would not only pour out words to God, but his very Heart and Spirit, if it were pofiible, all of it, without referving fo much as a glance or a piece of a broken thought towards carnal things ; a Duty to the Great God is a thing of vad import and confequence ; therefore he would do it with the greated drength of intention and affeftion. David like he calls upon his Soul, and all that is within him to intend the tiling in hand ; but becaufe when he hath done his utmod, there will yet be many failures and infirmities ; the holy Man looks up to Mercy for a Pardon, and offers up all his Duties in and through Jefus Chad the great Mediator. In the Old Te- I i i dament 2o An Holy Life Chap. i*. [Lament the holy Man prayed thus, Remember , O my God, and f pare we , Neh. 13.22. Enter not into judgment with thy Servant \ PJal.i^.z. Ifthou^ Lord y jhouldeft mark iniquities y ivho jh all ft and > Pfa/. 1 3 o. 3 . The fenfe of their many imperfections made them fly to a Mercy-feat : In the New Teftament we are exprefly directed, To do all in the Name of the Lord JifuSy Col. 3.17. To make our approaches to God in and through him, Eph. 2. 1 8. To offer up fpiritual Sa- crifices acceptable to God by him, 1 Pet. 2. j. Every Duty mull be tendred unto God in and through the Mediator : therefore the holy Man doth not (land upon the Perfection of his Services, but implore a Pardon of his Infirmities ; neither doth he tender his Services immediately unto God, but he puts them into the hand of Chrilt, that being perfumed, and as it were, glorified by his merits, they might from thence afccnd up before God, and be gracioufly ac- cepted by him. Moreover, becaufe Ordinances are but Medium's and Chanels of Grace, the Holy Man in the life of them lifts up his Eyes to God , to have them filled with the Divine Spirit and Blelling; a meer outward Sanctuary of Ordinances will not ferve his turn ; he would fee the Power and the Glory, the goings of God in it : He cannot live by Bread only ; not the Life of Nature by the Bread of Creatures only ; not the Life of Grace by the Bread of Ordinances only : in both he waits for that word of Bleifing, which proceeds out of God's Mouth ; this is that which makes the Ordinance communi- cate Grace and Comfort to us: When- the Word is preached, it is not enough to the holy Man to have the Sacred Truths outwardly propofed, or to hear t£ie voice of a Man teaching the fame ; but his Heart and The EffeSi of Faith and Love. 43 1 and his Fleih cry out for the Living God. Oh ! that Chap. u. God would fpeak inwardly in words of Life and Power! that deep and Divine impreilions might be made upon the Heart, tolanctify it by the Truth, and to call it more and more into the mould of the Divine Will ! Oh ! that God would come and ihine into theHeart,that he would uncover the hoi}- things, and bring forth Evangelical Mvfteries to the view, that the Heart might be ravilhed in the fweet odours of Chrift > that the Promiles might flow out as a Con- duit of Celeftial Wine, and make the Soul tafte fome drops of the pure Rivers of pleafure which are above ! This is the defire and expectation of the holy Man in hearing ; in like manner in Prayer it is not enough to him to pour out words before God, but he looks for the holy Spirit, to help his Infirmities, and breath upon his Devotions ; that as Chrift pleads above by his Merits and Sweet-fmelling Sacrifice, fo the Holy- Spirit may plead in the Heart with fighs and groans that cannot be uttered; being confcious to himfelf, what a thing his Heart is ; how much coldnefs, hard- nefs, flraitnefs is yet remaining there ; he waits for the Spirit to be as fire from Heaven to inflame the Heart,and make it afcend up unto God;to melt it, and make it open and expand towards Heaven, to fet it a running in Spiritual fluency and enlargements to- wards God. The holy Man efteems all to be loft and to no purpofe, unlefs he can have fome converfe and communion with God in every ordinance : his Heart and the Ordinance have both the fame fcope and tendency, that there may be a Divine inter- courfe between God and him ; God draws ; and he runs, Cant. 1.4. God fa&\,Seek ye my Face; And the Soul anfwers, Thy Face, Lord, will I feek,Pfal. 27. 8. I i i z There 43 2 An Holy Life Chap. 1 1. There are Divine Influences and Spirations on God's vyy\^ part, and there are compliances and refponfes in the holy Heart ; in Prayer it burns and afpires after him who fet it a fire by the communications of his Grace and Love ; in Praife it carries back the received Bleffings, and lays them down at the feet of the great Donor ; in the hearing of the Word, it hath fomething or other to anlwer to every part'; it trembles at the threatning ; it leaps up, and in tri- umphs of Faith embraces the Promife; it complies with the pure Command in holy Love and Obedi- ence: without this Communion y in which God and Man fpiritualiy meet together, the holy Man looks on.Ordinances, but as dry empty things, void of Life, and feparate from their chief end • but if the holy Spi- rit breath upon the Heart,and that breath out it felt to God ; if the Soul fet it felf to feek God's Face, and that irradiate the Duty ; then the Ordinance is full of Life , and reaches its end. The holy Man then perceives that God is in it of a truth : hence one, as Be liar mine relates, ufed to rife from Duty with thefe words, Clauclimini oculi mei, claudimini, nihil enlm pulchrius jam vtdebitis ; Be Jliut, O my Eyes, be ihut, for I ihall never behold a fairer object than God's Face, which I have now beheld. Take him in Alms and Charity, he is holy there ; he knows that he was born, nay, and by a Di- vine Generation born again, that he might do good : It was a notable Speech of the Philofoper, The Beafts, Plants, Sun, Stars were defigned for fome work or other, <& *v <®s)* ^'y and what are you for ? When he thinks that he is a Man, a rational Creature, and, which is more, a new Creature, and by Ad- option one of the Seed Royal of Heaven; he kes a ne~ The Effect of Faith and Love. 433 neceiiity laid upon him to be fruitful in Charity Chap. 12, and Good Works : If he who hath a firft and a fe- ^TV^ cond Birth , who hath the good things of Nature and Grace,do not do good, who (hall do it ? or where may it be expected? The holy Man therefore ftts himfelf to do good; he doth not only do the out- ward work of Charity, but he doth it readily and freely ; when an object of Charity meets him,he doth not fay, Go and come again, when he himfelf goes to the Mercy-feat, he would not have God delay or turn him off after that manner : Neither will lie do fo to his poor Brother, not only the command cf God, but the tafte; that he hath, of the Divine Grace, make him ready and free in good Works,- his Good Works have not only a Body, but there is a free Spirit in them ; and as the thing given- fupplie3 the Receiver's want, fo the manner of giving revives his Spirit : The holy Man doth not only give Alms,, but he doth it out of Love and Companion ; Bene- ficently ex Benevolent/a manare debet ; he doth good out of good will; he opens his heart as well as his hand; he doth not only draw out his Alms, but his Soul to the hungry ; he doth not only give outward things, but himfelf in real companions to the affli- cted : he knows that Sacrifice is not acceptable to God without Mercy ; no more is the outward Alms- deed without inward Pity ; he therefore as the Elect of God, puts on Bowels of Mercy, that when his lkmd is diftributing, his Bowels may be moved to- wards thofe in mifery ; that he may not give a mcer external thing,but aliquidfm ipfius Some- thing of himfelf.; I mean,his Companion; Sl «*^ ^ fi «J- it doubles the Alms to give it with Pity ; ™ ldlam * *»«&»"» cnimfi- meer Mercy in it felf is a comfort to the latll ) m f'^ m f Tl ' m- n . , ; , • . , r \ cor dia- Naz.Orat. 16 attuctcd,but when it comes with a fupply of 434 An Holy Life Chap, i ^. of necefTaries in its hand ; it is then a comfort in mat- y^sy*^ ter and manner. Moreover, the holy Man hath not only humane Bowels, but Chriftian ; in all his ads of Charity he moves from an high Principle, and un- to an high end: and upon that account the Apoftle calls thofe acls Pure Religion , Jam. 1.27. Ipfamifericordia,fipro- And St. Auflin call them a Sacrifice, .a per Deum nonfit, non efi Divine thing- gift, I fay, He ads from Samficmm: Samfaum an h ; h p rinciple he doth not extend res divina eft Auit. ue Aif ° tk* r 1 r .Civ.Deil.10.c6.' Mercy to Men in mifery, only out of humanity, but out of love to God ; he doth not refpecl: them, meerly becaufe they are his ■ownFleih, fuch as are in conjunction of Nature with him ; but chiefly becaufe they are rational Creatures, fuch as ftand in Relation to God, and are capable of union with him ; the love of God, Q who alone is to be loved for himfelf ) is the great Wheel which moves our. Love and Mercy towards our Neighbour. "St. John argues thus, Whofo feeth his Brother have need, and Jhutteth up his Bowels of compajfwn from him, how dwelleth the Love of God in him? 1 Joh.^. 1 7. It is all one, as if he had faid, There is no Love of God at all in him ; for if there were any that would open his Bowels towards his Brother, Piety towards God is the right Fountain of Charity towards Men. De DoStr. Again, He afts unto an high end ; Charitas eft mo- Chrifi. I 3. tus anlmi ad fruendum Deo propter ipfum, & fe & pro- *«-io. ximo propter Deum, faith St. Auflin, Charity is the motion of the Soul to enjoy God for himfelf, and it felf and its Neighbour for God. The holy Man in his adls of Chanty hath a Supream refpect unto God; he would refemble and glorify God in them; there is nothing wherein he can lhew himfelf more like unto God than in Mercy and Love : God, when he pro- The BffeSl of Faith and Love. 435 proclaims his Name, Exod. 34. 6. infills very much Chap. 12. upon Mercy. He is good, and doth good,? jal. 1 1 9. 68. Therefore the holy Man would be ft ill a doing of good, that he might in his Sphear , though but a little one, refemble that God ; who doth good in the great Sphear of Nature ; God makes his Sun to fliine and rain to tall every where : and the holy Man, who would be like him, endeavours to ihine in good works, and drop in Charities upon all oc- cahons; in all he would have no other center than God and his Glory; his aim is, that thofe drops a nd models of Mercy which are in him may bear witnefs to the infinite Fountain and Ocean of Mercy which is above; ftill he defires that God in all things may be glorified. Take him in profperity, he is holy there. I may fay of him what the Hiftorian faith of Mauritius the Emperour, His Profperity doth not make him leave his Piety. He efteems himfelf lefs than the leaft of God's Mercies ; he holds all that he hath in capite of God the great Donor ; he defires to fee free Grace in every crum ofBread,drop of drink, and moments pati- tience;when there is aTable fpread,and aCup running over,and an affluence of all good things; he fuffers no- thing to be loft ; but returns ail in a thankful acknow- ledgment unto the giver: Thus holy David,AIl things are of thee, 1 Chr.zq. 1 4. Life,Health,Peace,Profperity 5 the whole Catalogue of Bleffings are from God ; the holy Man looks on it as no lefs than Sacriledge to fub- ftrad the leaft fragment from him. He looks upon Bleffings in dependance upon their Original; he fees the fence and meaning of them to be this, that our hearts may be guided and directed by them to the in- finite Fountain of Goodnefs. He pofiefles them,but he wilk 436 An Holy Life Chap, i x. \\ ill not be pofleffed by them; they may flow round a- bout himj but they muft keep their diitance^ and not enter into the heart,which is referved as an holy pjace for God ; white they ftand without and mimfter to the outward Man, they are Bleffings, and Glafles of -the Divine Goodnefs ; but if once they lean their fta- tion, and are taken into the Heart, they are Idols and Vanities; there is a blaft and acurfe upon them, be- caufe they turn away the Heart from God the Foun- tain of Living Waters : In the midft of all outward Bleffings , the holy Man is but a Pilgrim in this World ; here is not his Happinefs his happinefs or center of reft ; he looks after far greater and nobler tilings than thofe which grow here below ; Corn, and Wine, and Oil are in his Eyes but poor things in com- parifon of God's favour : Heaven is his Country, and by a Divine touch, from thence, his Heart, though courted by the World, will point thither ; he refolves with himfelf , he will be happy only in God, and in nothing elfe : whilft he is here, he ufes his out- ward good things in the fear of God. He knows that The Earth is the Lord's, and the fulnefs thereof : God is the abfolute Proprietor, and Man but a Steward only. The poor Man in his neceffities hath a right to have fupply out of the fuperfluities of the Rich ; the Charity of the Rich is but Fidelitas in a- lieno, Faithfulnefs in that which is another Man's, Luke 1 6. 12. Riches are a Talent and muft be ac- counted for; if oppreffion make the beam cry out of the wall , or if outward things become the fuel of of luft, or if the non-ufer bring a ruft upon them, it will be a very ill reckoning at the laft day ; therefore the holy Man endeavours to perform his truft ; he is, what his Riches call for, rich in good Works; the Good- The Effeff of Faith and Love. 437 Goodnefs of God to htm makes him good to others; Chap i*. j the open hand of the great Donor makes him afhamed ^^\^_> to (hut his own : his great intereft lies in the other World 5 and upon that account the exchanges his out- wards things thither, by fuch acts of Charity as fol- low him, and live for ever. Take him in adverfity, he is holy there ; as in pro- fperity his anfwer is (what was fo much in the mouth AufbaP/j/. of the ancient Chriftians) Deo gratias^ God be thank- 1 3 2.. ed for this Mercy and that Mercy ; lb in adverfity, his anfwer is an holy Silence under God's hand : or if he open his mouth, it is in fome fuch Language as that, It u the Lord, let him do what fee met h him good: who fhould fit at the Stern, and rule all, but he ? his Will is fupream, and a law to it felf; his acti- ons are all juft and wife; the holy Man will not murmur or charge him foolilhly; he will not inter- pofe in the Government, or fo much as ft art a thought that things might be better ordered than they are; what ever his fuflerings be, ftill he w r ould have God govern ; ftill he concludes, nothing can be better than that which God doth. When he is tofled on Earth, he cafts his Anchor in Heaven ; his Heart is fixed, trufting in the Lord ; in an admirable manner he hangs upon him who fmites him; he adheres to him who feems to caft him off; he looks for a fe- cret fupport from him, who preffes him down ; he expefts that the very hand which wounded, fhould heal him; though all outward things take wing, and fly away ; he will not part with God ; though God wrap up himfelf in a cloud of black Providences, yet he will wait at the door of one Promife or other, till he have a fmile or glimpfe of the Divine favour; and, if that be fufpended, yet he will wait on, and comfort himfelf, the affliftion is not Hell ; all the K k k trou- 438 An Holy Life Chap. 1 z. troubles of this Life are but the allies of the furnace,, a little time will blow them away; and then comes an Heaven, an Eternity of joy and comfort which pays for all : The holy Man will wait, but that is not all, he fets himfelf ferioufly to read the meaning of the Crofs ; and by comparing his Heart and this affliftioiijhe picks out the fence thus, Here, faith he, pointing to his Heart, is the vanity, and there's the Fan which drives away the Chaff; here's the drofs of earthly affections, and there's the Fire which melts, it away ; here are the ill humours, and there the bitters Pills which purge them out ; and w r hile he is humbling himfelf in fuch confiderations as thefe, at [aft he comes-to read Love in the Crofs; and to have a fweet experience, that even that works for his good- God doth it in faithfulnefs to wean him from the Breafts of Creatures ; and to endear Heaven to him; to make him learn that great Leffbn, To be fubject to the Father of Spirits, and live for ever ; to make his Faith and Patience come forth as gold doth out of the Furnace, in their pure luflre and glory : and, as foon as he perceives this, all is well ; he can now lit down, and ling Deo grat/as ; not to Bleilings only, but alio to Afflictions ; upon the whole account he finds, That it was good for him that he was afflicted. Thus he fanclities God under the Crofs. Take him in his Contracts and Dealings in the World, he is holy there; he doth, according to that golden Rule, Do to others as he would have them do to him. In his Contracts he deals Bona fide, trur ly and honeftly : fo he makes, and fo he performs diem. In Selling, he will have no more gain than what is realbnable, and in a juft proportion : In Buy- ing, he will allow as much ; he impofes not upon an unkillfui The Effect of Faith and Love. 439 unskillful Perfon, but ufcs him as one would a Child, Cfrap. u. in a fair manner; he will not in all Tower, Col. 1. n. to do what is decorous to his fpiritual Nature : he grows outward ,• he hath not only the fruits of Righteoufnefs, but he is filled with them, Phil. 1 . 1 1 . The influences of Grace,and fupplies of the Spirit make him to bring forth much fruit, and that with great variety ; as occafion ferves, all the fruits of the Spirit, Love, Joy, Peace, Long- Suffering, Gentlenefs, Goodnefs, Faith,. Meeknefs^ Tem- - perance, (which the x^poftle mentions, GaL^.zz^ & 2 j.)break forth from him in their fpiritual Glory: He is like the Tree planted by the Rivers of Water 5 v Pf.i.^. which hath a fruit for every Seafon ; or like Jo- J'eph's Fruitful bough by a Well,whofe Branches run over the Wall, Gen. 49. 22. There is a redundance and exuberancy of Holy Fruits, which iliew that he hath aDivine Spirit, a Well of living Water in him fpring- tag 444 An Holy Life Chap. ii. ing up into all Obedience and goodWorks. He grows ^s^T^y upward; by converfing in holy things, he is un- earthed and unfelved ; he converfes more than ever in Heaven ; the Glory of God is more precious to him ; his Intention towards it is more pure than it hath been; he waits and longs to be in that BleiTed Region where God is all in all : Eveiy Duty and Good Work looks up more directly than was ufual to God the great Center and End of all things : He grows downwards , I mean in Humility ; by converfing with God he comes to have a greater Light than ever; which difcovers the Majefty and purity of God, the rectitude and Holinefs of the Law, the infirmity and reliques of Corruption in the lapfed Nature of Man; and this Difcovery makes him very humble and vile in his own Eyes, even his very lapfes and De Corr. & ^ s ^ erve occafionally to this growth : Hence St.Au- 'Grat.c.y. ft ln -> treating on thofe words , All things work toge- ther for good to them that love God, Rom. 8. adds, Etiam fi deviant & exorbitant, hoc ipfum eis faciat proficere in bonum, quia humiliores redeunt & doclio- res; Experience tells him, that he is nothing, and Grace is all Morever, the Holy Man never thinks that he hath Grace enough; never faith, I am perfect, or, I have attained ; this would fhew him to be Inceftio hona T>*J World, to grow in Grace and in the Knowledg of of Chrifl ; to abound more and more in Obedience and Holy Walking, till he come to the Crown of Lift and Righteoufnefs in Heaven. We lee what an Holy Life is ; nothing remains but that we labour after It; lapfed Nature lies too low to elevate it felf into Holy Principles and Actions; how y fhould we call down our felves at God's feet for Re- generating Grace ? How much doth it concern us to wait upon him in the ufe of means? to have our Minds enlightened to fee Spiritual things? to have our Hearts new made and moulded into the Divine Will- to have a precious Faith to receive Chrifl: in all his Offices ? to have an Holy Love to inflame the Heart towards God ? It is God's Prerogative to work fu- pernatural Principles in us ; let us then look up to him to have them wrought in us. We have loft the Crown and Glory of our Creation ; we are funk into an horrible gulf of fin and mifery : but, Oh! let our Eyes be upon God ; he can fet to his Hand a fe- cond time, and create us again unto Good Works ; he can let down an Arm of Power, and lift us up out of the pit of Corruption ; nothing is too hard for him, he can turn our ftony Heart into Fleih ; he can by an omnipotent Suavity make our unwilling Will to be a willing one. Oh ! wait for this day of Power ; and when it comes, give all the Glory to Free-grace, and live as becomes the Sons of God, who are born not of the Will of Man, but of God,- it is too too much time we have fpent in doing the Will of the Flefh; let us now confecrate and dedicate our felves to the Will of God. In the doing of it let's Lll 2 live 448 An Holy Life Chap. 1 %. live a Life of Faith and dependance upon the influen- ces of Grace : let's get a fingle Eye, a pure Intention towards the Will and Glory of God. What good we do, let's do it in an holy Compliance with his Will, in a fincere fubferviency to his Glory. This is right genuine Obedience,- in which God is owned as the firft Principle, and the laft End ; if we depend not on him the Fountain of Grace, how fliall we ftand or walk in Hoiinefs ? If we direct not all our good Works to his Will and Glory, how are our Works Holy or Confecrated unto God ? Let's put away our high thoughts and proud reflexes upon felf, that we may wholly depend upon his Grace. Let's call; a- way all our Squints and corrupt aims from us , that we may directly look to his Will and Glory. Still let us remember , that the work of Mortification muft be carried on ; if we indulge fin, we rent off our felves from God the chief Good and Ultimate End : if we confecrate our felves to God, we muft needs caft away fin from us ; the Spirit and Fleili are contrary Principles, and cannot rule together ; the Works of the one and of the other cannot be compounded; the great Centers Heaven and Hell are at a vaft diftance, and cannot meet : We muft there- fore die to Sin, or elfe we cannot live to God ; let us labour to be Holy in all manner of Converfation ; let us go forth and meet God in every difpenfation; in Ordinances let us meet him with Devotion and holy Afledion ; in Alms with Love and a free Spirit : in Profperity with Praifes and Good Works; in Ad- verfity with Patience and Silence ; in our Dealings with Juftice and Righteoufnefs ; in our Callings with Faithfulnefs and Diligence : In every thing let us walk *'&'«* «"* ©«» worthy of God; as becomes thofe who. The Efeff of Faith a?id Love. 44^ who are confecrated unto him. Let us fo exercife Chap. 12, our felves unto Piety, that we may grow in all Gra- ces ; that our Faith may be more lively, our Love more ardent, our Humility more low, our Heaven- linefs more high, our Obedience more full, our Pa- tience more perfect; that we may have our fruit unto Holinefs, and the End Everlafting Life. Let us be ever making our felves ready for that BlefTed Regi- on ; where there are plenitudes of Joy, Crowns uf Immortality, Rivers of Pleafures ; where God is the Light, Life, Love, All in all to the Saints. FINIS, ERRATA'S. PAge 5" 7. Line 1 o. read burned, p. 7 2. \.%j. formally, p. 7^. 1. 4, Vajored, p. 90. 1. 1 9. ears, p. 1 3 8. 1. 14. Sun, p. 141 . 1. 6Vcs p. 148.1. 1 4. ^/f»^/, p. 1 5-0. l.i 7. Carnal Ordinances, p. 167. 1.6". often caft, p.203. 1. 1 o. heart, p.247. Lj.pofibly, p. 3 17.1.10. none forthePromife, Ib.l.21. capable of, p.3 30. 1.2. true, p. 5 39. I.3. Righteoufnefs of God, p. 343. 1. 1 . is it a Jus Impunitatis, p. 3 5- c. in the marg. Note, r.confecratum eft, p. 3 66. 1.4. itsfubjeB,^. 371. 1. 1 2. the Glory of it, it is ours, p.420. 1. 1 c. exprejfion, p.42 8. l.i; ray. ,Reader, the mi [placed Points or Stops dofometimes very muc 6 alter cr obfcure the Sence ; let fuch places be read without any re— $ett to them,, and then the Sence will appear. Books fold by Thomas Cockerill, at the Three Legs in the Poultry, over againfi the Stocks-Market. ■ Books publiftd ly the fame Author, PRecious Faith confidered in its Nature, Working, and Growth, in So. The Divine Will confidered in its Eternal Decrees and holy Execution of them, /// So. An Anfwer to a Difcourfe of Mr. William Sherlock , touching the Know ledg of ChriiVand our Union and Communion with nim, in 80. Morning Exercife at Cripple-Gate, or feveral Cafes of Confcience pradtically refolved by fundry Mmi- fters, in 40. A Supplement to the Morning Exercife at Cripple- jGate; Or feveral more Cafes oi Confcience, practi- cally reftflved by fundry Mini iters, ///40. The Court of the Gentiles, in 4 Parts, by Theophi- lus Gale, in 40. Pfeudodoxia Epidemica : Or, Enquiries into very many Received Tenets, and commonly prefumed Truths : Together with the Religio Medic /, by Tho. Brown Knight, M. D. 40. A Difcourfe of Patronage : Being a modelt Enquiry into the Original of it, and a further profecution of the Hiftory of it; by Zachariah Covodry, in 40. The Poor Man's Family-Book, by Rich. Baxter, in 80. The Faithfulnefs of God confidered and cleared, in the the great Events of his Works; or a Second Part of the fulfilling of the Scriptures, by the fame Author, in 80. The Englifh School: or, The readieft way for teaching Children or Elder Perfons to fpell and read rightly, pronounce and write true Engiijh ; contain- ing alfo a Catalogue of all the words in the Bible, fift« by Tobias Ellys, in 80. ANew Book of Spelling withSyllables,or an Alpha- bet and plain Path- way to the Faculty of Reading the Engiijh, Roman y Italian and Secretary Hands ; with feveralCopies of the fame,divifed chiefly for Children, that thereby with the lefs lofs of their time they may be able to pafs from Reading to the Latin Tongue : Alfo this Book is very neceflary for the Ignorant, to teach them to write true Orthography in ihort time. A Week of Soliloquies ani Prayers, with a Prepa- ration to the holy Communion, and other Devotions added to this Edition, in two Parts, by Peter Du Mou- lin D. D. in 12. De CaufaDei : Or, A Vindication of discommon Doftnne of the Protejlant Divines, concerning Pre- determination (/. e. The Intereft of God as the firft Caufe, in all Actions as fuch of all Rational Crea- tures ) from the invidious conference with which it is burden'd, by Mr. John Howe, in a late Letter and Poftfcript of God's Prefcience, in %o, A Dialogue between a Popifh Priejl and an Engiijh Protejlant; wherein the principal Pcnnts-and Argu- ments of both Religions are truly propofed, and fully examined, by Matthew Poole , Author of the Synopp Criticorum y in iz. The Spiritual Remembrancer : Or, A Brief Dif- courfe of th^ Duty of tiiofc who attend upon the preach- -preaching of the Gofpel, by S'awmel Weliey, in So. God a Chriftian's Choice, compleated" by par- ticular Covenanting with God, wherein the Law- fulnefs and Expediency is cleared, by Samuel Winney^ in 12. The Reuniting of Chriftianity: Or, The manner how to rejoyn all Chriftians under one fole Contefli- on of Faith, in 80. . iter tgii