• ■ OF TIIK Theological Seminary PRINCETON, N. J. Shelf. Division Section Wo A DONATION Tifftibci) /-^PS // hil^^i ,fi'i^fi^c(fid /S^o 'J A VIEW OF RELIGIONS, IN TWO PARTS. Part I. Containing an alphabetical cbMPENDit/^ OF THE Various RELIGIOUS DENOMINATIONS, which have appeared in the world, from the BEGINNING OF THE C H R ISTI A M JfcR a TO THE PRESENT DAY. Part IT. Containing a brief account op The DIFFERENT S C H E M E S OF R E L I G 1 Q N NOW EMBRACED AMONG MANKIND. The whole collected From the beft Authors, Ancient and Modem. By HANNAH ADAMS. Thf Second Edition, with large Addi TIONS. Pro-ui all things, held faft that ^hith is good, Apofile Pa u l. BOSTON; VRi«i^« B^ JOHN WEST FOLSOM. To JOHN ADAMS^ VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES of AMERICA Encouraged by your wdi tmvn cond^fcenfion and goodnefs, I uke t lie liberty to prefix, your Katmtothh vork, a v.anis e>q,re five of every patriotic virtue, vhich excites the veneration and gratitude of y^ur fellow ciiizm, the admiration and ejlecm of foreign nations. TFhile your diningmfbed abilities, the crnameni end delight cf your country, have raifed you to the firftrank of literary eminence; let me humbly hope my feeble attempt to reprefent vith impartiality the femiments of the various denomination of chriftians, will meet vith your candor and indulgence. Though born in humble obfcurity, a ftranger to pohte forms of add^ef), I am capable of the highcfi ejttcm DEDICATION. efteern for thofe illuftrious charaBerSy to whrnt under heaven^ we are indebted for our civil and religious priviledges. That you may long enjoy the felicity of feeing your generous exertions for your country crowned with in^ creafiyig fuccefsy and the fentirnents of liberty^ which you have cultivated in America^ extending their he-- nign influence through the worlds is the ardent wifo of^ S I R, Your moil obedietit Humble fervant^ HANNAH ADAMS. To THE READER. I T will be eafily perceived, that the compiler of the following work has, with great labor and pains, ranfacked the treafures of ecclefiaftical hiftory, ancient and modern, to bring into view what is here prefented to the public. She claims no other merit than that of having honeftly and impartially collefled the fenfe of the different fefls, as it is given by the authors to whom fhe refers : nor was it a vain ambition of appearing as an author, that put her upon Writing ; her own fatisfaftion and amufement being the only obje£l. Having yielded however to its publication, at the defire of feveral judicious friends, (he has alfo done vio- lence to her own inclination, by prefixing her name. The world has been abfurdly accuftomed to entertain but a moderate opinion of female abilities, and to afcribe their pretended produftions to the craft and policy of defigning men ; either to excite admiration or fcrecn their weaknefs from cenfure : whereas unbiafled reafon mufl: allow, if an invidious comparifon between the fexes is in any refpe(5l juftifiable, it cannot be grounded upon a defeifl of natural ability, but upon the different, and perhaps faulty mode of female education ; for under fimilar culture, and with equal advantages, it is far from being certain that the female mind would not admit a meafure of improvement, that would at lead equal, and perhaps in many inflances eclipfe, the bonded glory of the other fex. There To THE READER, There have heen female writers, and biftorians, ^vh6 have been defervedly honored in the literary world.' ~ The celebrated Mrs. Maccauley Graham, who has lately honored our country with her prefence, is a living example. The writer of this compendium having been from her youth fond of books, has made herfelf acquainted with the Greek and Latin tongues, which may fufficiently account for fo frequent a ufe of terms in thofe languages. However the volume may be received by thofe who are verfed in the hiftoric page, it may at leafl be ufeful and en- tertaining to thofe who have neither leifure nor opportunity to perufe the numerous volumes from which the whole is collected. — With regard to many of the ancient feels, it is well known little has been preferved, and therefore little can be here expelled. — With refpeft to others, fuch as de- fire further information, are diredled by references to the volumes, and generally to the pa^es, where their inquifitive minds may be fatisfied. It is truly aftonifhing that fo great a variety of faith and practice fhould be derived, with equal confidence of their different abettors, from one and the fame revelation from heaven : but while we have the lively oracles, we are net to adopt any of the numerous fchemes of religion, further than they have a manifcft foundation in the facred pages. To the law and to the teftimony ; if they fpeak not accords ing to this word, however fpecious their fyftems may ap- pear, " there is no light jn them," With cordial wifhes for the divine illumination of the Koly Spirit, by which the facred fcriptures were indited, and a univerfal prevalence of the knowledge and practice ©f pure and undefiled religion before God and the Father : I am the reader's mofl: obedient Humble fervant, THOMAS PRENTISS. Medfield. ADVERTISEMENT. ^HE reader will pJeafe to ohferve, that the following rules have been carefully adhered to through the whole of this performance, ly?. To avoid giving the leaf} preference of one denomination above another : omitting thofe pafjages in the authors cited^ where they pafs their judgment on the fentiments of which they give an account : confequently theinahng ufe of any fuch appel- lations as Heretics, Schifmatics, Enthufiafts, Fanatics, ^c. Is carefully avoided, 2d, To give a few of the arguments of the principal fe^s, from their own authors, where they could be obtained, 2d. To endeavour to give the fentiments of every feSf in the general colleBive fenfe of that denomination, A^th, To give the whole as much as poffihle in the words of the authors from which the compilation is made, and where that could not be done without too great prolixity ^ t9 take the utrmjt care not to mifreprefent the ideas. View of religions.- PART I. moft wjA BRAHAMIANS, a denomination in 4 the ninth century ; fo called from their ^ founder, Abraham. They received the ^ do6lrines of the Paulicians, and are faid to have employed the crofs in the fervile offices. [See Paulicians.] Diiiionary of Arts and Sciences j njoL I,/. lO. ABYSSINIAN-CHURCH, that eftablifhed in the em- pire of Abyflinia : they maintain that the two natures are united in Chrift without either confufion or mixture ; fo that though the nature of our Saviour be really one, yet it is at the fame time two-fold and compound. They differ from the Eutychians in this refpe^l. They C'onfefs, that the nature of Chrift is compofed of two na- tures, B 20 AD x\ tures, the divine and himan ; which being united, became one fingle nature ; but Eutyches affirmed the human to be wholly abforbed in the divine. The Abyffinlan-church embraced thefe tenets in the fev- enih century. They difown the Popes fupremacy, and tranfuhftantiation, though they believe the real prefence of Chriit in the facrament ; they adminiller the communion in both kinds, like the Rotnan Catholics ; they offer their devotions and prayers to the faints, and have proper offi- ces, fafts, and feftivals in memory of them. They believe a middle (late, in which departed fouls muft be purged from their fins, and may be greatly affifted and relieved by the prayers, alms, and penances of their furviving friends, who feldom fail of performing fo charitable, and as they deem it, meritorious duty to them frequently, and with great fer- vency. They u{q confejfiony 3,nd vcccive penance and alfo" lution from the prieils. For other particulars relating to thisChurch, fee Part IL Mojk elm's Eccleftaftical Hijiory, ^oL 2,p, 172. 'vol. 3. p. 492. Diilionary of Arts and Sciences ^ 'vol. 1, p, 15. Modern Univer/al Hijiory, *vol i$* p. 174—177. ACEPHALI, i. e. headlefs. The word is compoimded of the privative a and x£ 14. ADESSENARIANS, a branch of the Sacrammtarians, fo called from the Latin AdeJJc. to he prejent ; becaufe they believed the prefence of Chriit's body in ihteucharijl, though in a manner different from the Romanifts. They were fubdivided into thofe who held that the body of Jefus Chrift is in the bread, whence they were called Impanatores .♦ thofe who hold that it is ohont the bread \ thofe who faid it is with the bread ; and thofe who maintained that it is under the bread. Br ought on J ihid. ^.15. ADIAPHORISTS. [See Lutherans.] ADOPTIANS, followers of Felix of Urge!, and EU- pand of Toledo : who, towards the end of the eighth cen- tury, taught that Jefus Chrif}, with refpe£l to his human nature, was not the natural, but adoptive Son of God. Di£lionary of Arts and Sciences y 'vol. J. p. 4.9. AERIANS, a denomination which arofe about the year 342 ; fo called from one Aerius, a Prefbyter, Monk, and Semi-arian. One of his principal tenets was, that there is no diftindion, founded in fcripture, between a Prefnyter and a Bifhop. He built his opinion chiefly on the paffage in the firft epiflle to Timothy, in which the apojik exhorts him not to negle6l the gift he had received by the laying on the hands of the Prejhytery. Aerius condemned prayers for the dead, flated falls, the celebratiop of Eafter, and other rites 9f the like nature. Mojheim's Ecchftajlical HiJIory, 'vol. \. p. 314. Broughtoit*s Hiji or ical Library, 'vol. I. p. 22. AETIANS, a denomination which appeared about the vear X2 ALB year 336, fo called from Aetius, a Syrian. Befides the opin- ions which the Aetians held in common with the Arians, they maintained ih^t faith without ivorh was fiifficient to falvation ; and that no fin, however grcvous, would be im- puted to the faithful. Aetius moreover affirmed, that what pOD had concealed from the apojilest he had revealed to him, Br ought on J ibid, ^.24. AGINIANS, a denomination which appeared about the end of the feventh (;entury. They condemned the ufe of certain meats and marriage. — They had but few followers, and were foon fupprcfTed. Broughioftj thid, p. 26. AGNOITES, a deijomination which appeared about the year 370. They were followers of Theophronius, the Capadocian, who called in queftion the omnifcience of God ; alleging that he knew things paft only by memory, and things future only by an uncertain prefcience. There arofe another fe6l of the fame name about the year 535, w^ho followed the fentiments of Themifticus, deacon of Alexandria, who held that Chrift knew not when the day of judgment (hall be. He founded this opinion on 2, pafTage of St. Mark : Of that day and hour hnoweth 7io man ; riOy not the angels who arc in heaven, nor the Son, but the Fa^ ther only. This fed derive their name from thp Greek Ayv^^^'nu to be ignorant. BroughtOTit ibid, />. 26, 27. ALBANENSES, a denomination which commenced about the year 796. They held with the Gnoftics and Manicheans, two principles, the one of good, the other of fsvil. They denied the divinity , and even the humanity of jefus Chrift, afterting that lie was not truly man ; did not 'fuft'er on the crofs, die, rife again, nor really afcend intQ pfaven. They rejected the do£trinc of the rejurre^ion ; af- firme4 M r firmed that the general judgment was pad ; and that hell torments were no other than the evils we feel and fiifFer in this life. They denied free-will ; did not admit original Jin ; and never admlnjftered baptlfjn to infants. They held that a man can give the holy fi)irit of himfelf, and that it is unlawful for a chriftian to take an oath. This denomination derived their name from the place where their fpiriiual ruler refided. [See Manicheans and patharifts.] Broughton, Hid. /. 3 I. M(>Jheim'*s EccUjiaJiical Hijl. njoh 2 p. 445; ALBANOIS, a denomination which fprung up in the eighth century, and renewed the greateft part of the Mani- chean principles. They alfo maintained that the world was from eternity. [See Manicheans.] Collier'' s Hijiorical Di£lionary, 'voL i. [See Alhanois.'\ ALBIGENSES, fo called from their firft increafe in Albi andAlbigeois. A denomination remarkable for their oppofition to the difcipline and ceremonies of the church of Rome. Their opinions are fimilar with the Waldenfes, [See Waldenfes.] Perrhi^s Hijiory of the Waldenfes , />. 3. ALMARICIANS, a denomination which arofe in the thirteenth century. They derived their origin from Alma- ric, profeffor of logic and theology at Paris, who taught that every chrijlian was obliged to believe himjelf a member of ye/us Chrijiy and that without this belief none could be faved. His followers afferted that the power oi ih^ Path crh-^6. con- tinued only during the Mofaic difpenfation ; that of the Son twelve hundred years after his entrance upon earth. And that, in the thirteenth century, the age of the Holy Spi- rit commenced, in which the facraments and all external werfliip were to be aboliflied. And that every one was to be »4 A M M be faved by the Internal operations of the Holy Spirit alone, without any external a£l of religion, Mofieiins EccUJiaJiieal Hiftory , Note [c] uol. Hi. p. 129, 133. ALOGIANS, a denomination in Afia-Minor, in i&e year 171 ; fo called, becaufe they denied the divine hg&St or word, and the gofpel and writings of St. John, attributing them to Cerinthus. One Theodore of Byzantium, by trade a currier, was t&e head of this denomination. Broughton^s Hijiorical Library^ *vol. i. p. 33. AMMONIANS fo called from Ammonius Saccas, who taught with the higheft applaufe in the Alexandrian fchool, about the conclufion of the fecond century. This learned man attempted a general reconciliation of aliy^^y, 'wheiher phi I ofoj) hi ca I or religious. He maintained, that the great principles of sW phihfophical and religious truth were to Ire found equally in all fe£ts ; and they differed from each other only in their method of exprefling them, and in fome opinions of little or no importance ; and that by a proper interpretation of their refpedlive fentiments, they might cafily be united in one body, AMMONIUS, fuppofed that true philofophy derived Its <3.rigin and its confiftence from the Eaftern nations ; that it was taught to the Egyptians by Hermes ; that it was brought from them to theGreeks,and preferved in its original purity by Plato, who was the beft interpreter of Hermes and the cither Oriental fages. He maintained that all the different jeligions which prevailed in the world, were in their origi- jjal integrity, conformable to this ancient philofophy. But it unfortunately happened that the fymbols and fi61:ions, un- Jer which, according to the Eaftern manner, the ancients Slivered their precepts and dodlrines, were, in procefs of time erroneoufly underftood both by priefts and people in a literal fenfe j tl^at in confe^uence of this, the invifible be* ings A M M 55 Ings and demons, whom the fupreme Deity had placed ia the ditFerent parts of the univerfs as the minifters of his providence, were, by the fuggeftions of fuperftition, con- verted into Gods, and worlhipped with a multiplicity of vain ceremonies. He therefore infilled, that all the reli- gions of all nations fhould be reftored to their primitive ftandard, viz. the ancient philofophy of the Eajt ; and he af« ferted that his project was agreeable to the intentions of Jefus Chrift (whom he acknowledged to be a moft excel- lent man, the friend of God) and affirmed that his folc view in defcending on earth, was to fet bounds to the reign- ing fuperftition, to remove the errors which had crept into the religion of all nations, but not to abolifb the ancient theology, from which they were derived. Taking thefe principles for granted, Ammonius affoci- ated the fentiments of the Egyptians with the dodrincs of Plato ; and to finilh this conciliatory fcheme, he fo inter- preted the dodlrines of the other philofophical and religUut feSfs by art, invention, and allegory, that they feemed to bear fome refemblance of the Egyptian and Platonic fyftems * With regard to moral difcipline, Ammonius permitted the people to live according to the law of their country and the diftates of nature. But a more fublime rule was laid down for the wife, — they were to raife above all terreftrial things by the towering efforts of holy contemplation, thofe fouls whofe origin was celeftial and divine. They were ordered to extenuate by hunger, thirft, and other mortifi- cations, the fluggifh body which reftrains the liberty of the immortal fpirit ; that in this life they might enjoy com- munion with the Supreme Beingy and afcend after death, ac- tive * Ammonius left nothing behind him in writing ; nay, he impofed a law upon his difciples not to divulge his doftrines among the multitude, which law, horvever they made no fcruplc to ncgieft and violate. i6 ANT tiVe and unencumbered, to the Unlvcrfal Parent, to live m his prefence for ever. MojJ?nrns EcclefiOfiical Hijiory, ^ol. I. /. 137 to 144. AMSDORFIANS, a denomination of Proteftants iii the fixtcenth century, who took their name from Amfdorf their leader. It is faid they maintained that good works were not only unprofitable, but even oppofite and pernicious ta falvation. DiSlicnary of Arts and Sciences, 'vol, i. p, 131. ANABAPTISTS. [See Baptifts.] ANGELITES, a denomination which fprung up about the year 494 ; fo called from Angelium, a place in the city of Alexandria, where they held their firft meetings. They were called likewife Serverites, from one Serverus, who was the head of their (e€t ; as alfo Theodofians, from one among them named Theodofius, whom they made Pope at Alexandria. They held that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, are not the fame ; that none of them exifts of himfclf, and of his own nature ; and that there is a common Deity exiting in them all ; and that each is GOD, by a participation of this Deity. Broughtoii's Hijlorical Library , .24, 29, 136,137, 143^ 281,298,330. 1/0/. 2. ^. 144, 155. Saltmarjh on Free Grace, p. 52. Eaton s Honey-comb i p. 446. Tovun^s /IJJertiony /. 96. P if play of Gou^sjpecial Grace, p» 102, ANTITACT^, of AvriToi.r'Ka to oppofe, a branch of the Gnoftics v/ho held that God the creator of the univerfe, w^as good and juft ; but that one of his creatures had created evil, and engaged mankind to follow it in oppofition to God ; and that it is the duty of mankind to oppofe this guthor of evil in order to avenge God of his enemy. Bailey^ s Diiiionary, ^ol. 2. [See Jniita^^.] ^NTITRINITARI ANS, a general name given to all • ' thofq k t O «r thofe who deny the cloflrine of the Trinity, and particularly to the Arlans and Socifiians. Di^ionary of Art i and Sciences , 'vol. |. p. i6j. APELL^ANS, a denomination in the fecond century, fo called from Apelles, a difciple of Marcion. They affir- med that Chrifl:, when he came down from heaven, recei- ved a body, not from the fubflance of his mother, but from the four elements ; which, at his death, he rendered back to the world, and fo afcended into heaven without a body. With the Gnoftics and Manichees, they held two princi- ples, a good and a bad God. They afferted that the pro- phets contradicted each other. And denied the refurred:ion of the body. They erafed that pafTage of St. John, which fays every fptrif, that confejfjeth not that jfefus Chriji is come hi the fleflj h not of God, Broughton*s Hijiorical Library, 'vol, J. p. 58. APHTHARTODOCITES, a denomination in the fixth century, fo called from the Greek a^^ccprog incorrupt ttble, and Sl^aod to judge ^ becaufe they held that the body of Jefus Chrift was incorruptible, and not fubje(5l to death. They were a branch of the Eutychians. [See Eutychians. J Broughton, ibid. p. ^8. APOCARITiES, a denomination in the third century, fprung from the Manicheans. They held that the foul of ^Tian was of the fubftance of God. Br ought on, ibiJ^ p, 60, APOLLINARIANS, a denomination in the fourth cen- tury, who were the followers of Apollinaris, bifhop of Lao- dicea. He taught that Chrift's perfon was compofed of a union of the true divinity and a human body, endowed with a fenfitive foul, but deprived of the reafonable one, the di- vinity fupplying Its place, Jie addeji, that the liuman body united «2 ARC united to the divine fpirit, formed in Jefus Chrift one entire divine nature. Fotmefs Ecchjlajlical Hijiory, . I, 43>46« Emlyris ExtraBsy p, 9, lO^ Ii, 21. Par'ves' Humble Attempt, p* 6, 7. Theological Repojttory, vol. 4. p, 276. Doddri^ige^s LeftureSy p, 401. Loiuman^s Tra^s, p. 253, ARMENIANS, a divifion ofEaftern Chriftians, thus cal- led from Armenia, a country they anciently inhabited. The principal points in their dodlrine are as follows, ift. They ailert, with the Greeks, the procellion of the Holy Gholl from the Father only. 2d. They believe that Chrift at his defcent into hell, freed the fouls of the damned from thence, and reprieved them to the end of the world, when they ihall be remanded to eternal flames. 3d. They be- lieve that the fouls of the righteous fhall not be admitted to the beatific viiion till after the refurre6lion : notwithftand- ing which they pray to departed faints, adore their pidlures, and burn lamps before them. They ufe confeflion to the priefts, and adminifler the Eucharid in both kinds to the laity. In tlie facramcnt of baptifm, they plunge the infant thrice in water, and apply the chrifm with confecrated oil, in form of a crofs, to feveral parts of the body, and then louch the child's lips with the Eucharift. They obferve a multitude of fafts and feftivals. Brcughlon'i Hijioriceil Library , 'vol. 2. /, 329, 330, ARMINIANS. They derive their name fromJamesAr- minius, who was born in Holland in the year 1560. He Tvas the firft paOor at Amfterdam ; afterwards profeflbr of divinity at Leyden, and attracted the cflcejn andapplaufe of his ARM 27 his very enemies, by his acknowledged candor, penetration, and piety. They received alfo the denomination of Re- monftrants, from an humble petition entitled their remon- ftrances, which they addrefled in the year i^io, to the dates of Holland. The principal tenets of the Arminians are comprehended In five articles, to which are added a few of the arguments they make ufe of in defence of their fentiments. I. That the Deity has not fixed the future flate of man. kind, by an abfolute unconditional decree ; but determined from all eternity, to bellow falvaiion on thofe whom he forefaw would perfevere unto the end in their faith in Jefus Chrift ; and to infli6l everlafting punishments on thofe who fhould continue in their unbelief, and refift unto the end his divine fuccours. For, ar» the Deity is/w/?, holy.znd. mercifuly wife in all his counfels, and true in all his declarations to the fons of men, it is inconfiftent with his aflributesthy an antecedent decree^ to fix our commifTion of fo many fins, in fuch a manner, that there is no pofTibility for us to avoid them. And he re- prefents God difhonorabiy, Vr'ho believes, that by his m- vealed wilh he hath declared he would have all men to be fa- ved ; and yet, by an antecedent /i-^r^/ will, he would have the greatefi part of them to perifh. That he hath impofed a law upon the^, which he requires them to obey, on pe- nalty of his eternal difpleafure, though he knows they can- not do it without his jrrefiftible grace ; and yet is abfo- lutely determined to withhold this grace from them, and then punifh them eternally for what they could not do with- out his divine affiflance, II. That Jefus Chrift, by his death and fufFerings made an atonement for the fins oi all vianVmd in general, and of every individual in particular : that, however, none but thofe who believe in him, can be partakers of their divine bencfic. That ft^ ARM That is, the death of Chrift put all men m a capacity of being juflified and pardoned, upon condition of their faith, repentance, and fincere obedience to the laws ot the new covenant. For the fcriptures declare, in a variety of places, — that Chv\i\ d\ei for the zv bole world. John iii. i6, 17. Gop fo loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son^ that tuho- foever believed on him, might not perijh, but have everlajiin_g life, &c. lil of John, ii. 2. He is the propitiation not only for our fins, but for theftns of the whole world. And the apoflle exprefles the fame idea in Heb. ii. 9. when he fays, Chrifi taficd death for every man. Here is no limitation of that comprehcnfive phrafe. If Chrift died for thofe who perifti, and for thofe who do BOt perifh, he died for all. That he died for thofe who do not perifli, is confefifed by all ; and if he died for any who may or fhall perifl;, there is the fame reafon to affirm that he died for all who perifh. Now that he died for fuch, the fcripturefaysexprefsly, in iftofCor. viii. 11. And through thy knowledge Jh all the weak brother perijh for whom Chrifi. died. Hence it is evident Chrifi died for thofe who pe- rifh, and for thofe who do not perifh j therefore he died for fdl men. 1 1 L That raankind are not totally depraved, and that de- pravity does not come upon them by virtue of Adam's be- ing their public head ; but that mortality and natural evil only are the dire£l confcquences of his fm to his pofterity. For, if all men are utterly difabled to all good, and con- tinually inclificd to all manner of wickedncfs, it follows, that they are not moral agents. For how are we capable of performing duty, or of regulating our a(^ions by a law commanding good ^aiid forbidding evil, if our minds are bent to nothing but v.'hat is evil ? Then fin mufl be natu- ral to us ; and if natural, then ncceffary, with regard to us ; ind if neccfTary, then no fm. For what is natural to us, as hunger, ARM 2$ 'hunger, thirft, 5cc. we can by no means hinder ; and what we can by no means hinder, is not our fin. Therefore mankind are not totally depraved. That the fm of our firft parents Is not imputed to us, is evident; becaufe, as the evil adion they committed was perfonal, fo muft their real guilt be perfonal and belong on- ly to themfelves. And we cannot, in the eye of juftice and equity, be punifhable for their tranfgreflion. IV. That there is no fuch thing as i rrefiftible grace, in the converfion of finners. For, if converfion be wrought only by the unfruftable operation of God, and man is purely paflive in it, vain are ;all the commands and exhortations to wicked men to turn from thfir evil ways : — Ifai. i. i6. To ceaje to do evil, and learn to do w^Il. Deut. x, i6. To put off the old man, and put on the new ; Eph. iv. 22. And divers other texts to the fame purpofe. Were an irrefiftible power neceflary to the converfion of finners, no man could be converted fooner than he is ; becaufe, before this irrefi/lible a6lion came upon him, he could not be converted, and when it came upon him, he could not refift its operations : And there- fore no man could reafonably be blamed, that he lived fo long in an unconverted ftate : and it could not be praife- worthy in any perfon who was converted, fince no man can arefift an unfruftrable operation. V. That thofe who are united to Chrift by faith, may fall from their faith, and forfeit finally their ftate of grace. For the doflrine of a poffibility of the final departure of g with a regard to motives. Suppofing a power of felf-determt- ftatidn to exift, it is by no means neceifary it fliould be exerted. without regard to any end or rule. N 3* To prove, that a felf-determining power belong to the willjit is urged, that we ourfelves areconfciousof pofleffing fuch liberty. We blame and condemn ourfelves for our adlions ; have an inward fenfe of guilt, fhame, and remorfc of con fcience, which feelings are inconfiftent with the fcheme of necellity. We univerfally agree, that fome acflions deferve praife, and others blame ; for which there would be no foundation, if we were invincibly determined in every volition. Ap- probation and blame are confequent upon free adions only. It is an article in the chriftian faith, that God will ren- der rewards and punifliments to men for their anions in this life. We cannot maintain his juftice in this particu- lar, if men's adlions are neceflary, either in their own na- ture, or by divine decrees and influx. Activity and felf-determining powers are the foundatioa of all morality, all dignity of nature and charader, and the greateft poffible happinefs ; it was therefore neceflary, that fuch powers Ihould be communicated to us, and that fcope within certain limits ftiould be allowed for the exercife of ihem. Mojhiim^s Ecchfiafttcal Uijiory y 'vol. ^.p. 3, 7, g. Whitby^ on the Fi've Points^ p. 106, 107, 120, 125, 134, 251, 252, 254, 395, 393. Taylor on Original Sin, p. 13, 1 25. Stackhou/e*s Body of Diruinity, p, 1 55, 1 56. Locke on Free WilL--'Leiters bet-ween Clarke and Lehuiix, Correfpondence het^weenPrieJihy and Price, Colli er^s Hijlorical DiSiionaryg 'vol i . \^See Arminians.^ ARNOLD I STS,a denomination in the twelfth century, which derive their name from Arnold, of Brefia. Having obferved the calamities that fprung from the opulence of the Pontiffs and Bt/hops,he maintained, that nothing was to be left to the minifters of the gofpel but a fpiritual autho- rity. 32 A S C rity, and a fubfiftence drawn front tithes, and from the vo- luntary oblations of the people. Mop dm' i Ecclejiafiical Hijiqry, vol, 1. p. 50. ARTEMONITES, a denomination in the fecond cen- tury, fo called from Arteman, who taught, That at the birth oi the man Chrift, a certain divine energy y or portion of the divine nature, united itfelf to him. heim, ibid, tfol, i, p, 191. ARTOTYRITES, a denomination in the fecond cen- tury, who celebrated the Eucharift with bread and cheefe, faying, that the iirft oblations of men were of the fruits oi the earth, and of flieep. The word is derived from the Greek of ot^roq bread, and rupo? cheefe. The Artemonites admitted women to the prieft-hood and cpifcopacy. Broughtoii' 5 Hijlorical Library^ ^voL i, p, 85, ASCLEPIDOTiEANS. a denomination in the third century ; fo called from Afclepiodotus, who taught that Je- fus Chrifi was a mere man. Broughton, ibid. p. 88, ASCODROGITES, a denomination which arofe in the year i8r. They brought into their churches, bags or fkins, filled with new wine, to reprefent the new bottles, filled with new wine, mentioned by Chrift They danced round thefe bags, or fkins, and intoxicated themfelves with the wine. They are likewife called Afcita^ and both words are derived from the Greek of acH&? a bottle^ or bag. Brought on J ibid. p. ^'i, ASCODRUTES, a branch of Gnoftics in the fecond century ; who placed all religion in knowledge, and afferted that divine myfteries, being the images of invifible things, ought not to be performed by vifible things, nor incorporeal things A T H 33 things by corporeal and fenfible. Therefore, they rejc£led haptifm and the Euthariji. Broughtotij ibid, p. 89. ASSURITANS, a branch of the Donatifts, who held that the Son was inferior to the Father ; and the Holy Ghoft to the Son. They re-baptized thofe who ennbraced their fed ; and alTerted that good men only were within the pale of the church. [See Donatifts.] Didionary of Arts and Sciences, 'vol, l.p. 207. ATHANASIANS. Thofe who profefs fimilar fentl- ments to thofe taught by Athanafius, bifhop of Alexandria, who fiourifhed in the fourth century. He was bifhop, forty- fix years ; and his long adminiftration was fpent in a perpet- ual combat againft the powers of Arianifm. He is faid, to have confecrated every moment, and every faculty of his be- ing, to the defence of the do^lrine of the Trinity. The fcheme of Athanafius made the Supreme Deity to Confift of three perfons, the fame in fubftance, equal in power and glory. The firft of thofe three perfons and fountain of di- vinity to the other two, it makes to be the Father. The fecond perfon is called the Son, and is faid to be defcended from the Father, by an eternal generation of an ineffable and Incomprehenfible nature in the efTence of the Godhead. — ■ The third perfon is the Holy Ghofl, derived from the Fa- ther and the Son, but not by generation, as the Son is deri- ved from the Father, but by an eternal and incomprehenfi- ble proceffion. Each of thefe perfons are very and eternal God, as much as the Father himfclf ; and yet though dif- tinguifhed in this manner, they do not make three Gods, but one God.* E This • It is thus exprefled in the Athanafian creed. The catholic faith is this, that we worlhip one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity. For there is one perfon of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghcft. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Ht)Iy Ghoft is all one 5 the glo^ fy ec^uaJ, the majelly co-ctcrnal. 34 A T 11 This fyftcm alfo includes in it the belief of two natures in Jefus Chriil, viz. the divine and human, forming one perfon. To prove the iJlvtnity of Chrid, and his co-equality with the Father, this denomination argue thus. In John i. i. it is faid exprefsly, In the leglnning was the Word, and ihe Wordivas with GoD, and the fVordwas GoD. Which implies, that the JVord exifted from all eternity, not as a diftinft, feparate power, but the Word was with God, and the Word zvas God, not another God, but only another perfon, of the fame natnre, fubftance, and Godhead. It is evident, that St. John, intended the word God in this (Iridl fenfe, from the time of which he is fpeaking. In the beginning the Word was God, before the creation. It is not laid, that he was appointed God over the things which Ihould be afterwards created. He was God before any do- minion over the creatures commenced. It is faid, that all things abfolutely were made by him ; therefore he who created all things, cannot be a created be- ing. Since nothing was made but by and through him, it follows that the Son, as creator, muftbe eternal and ftridlly divine. Chrift's divinity and co-equality with the Father, are plainly taught in Phil. ii. 5, 6, 7, &c. Let this rnind be in yni, which zvas alfo in Chrij} Jefus t who being in the farm of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with GoD, but jnade himfelf of no refutations and took upon hijn the form of a fer» vant, Sec, Our divine Saviour fays of himfelf, I and my Father are one, John v. 19. He that has feen jne^ has feen the Father. John X. 30. All that the Father hath are mine. John xvi. 1 5. Thofc high and ftrong expreflions teach, that he is the fupreme God. The prophets dcfcribe the true God as the only Saviour of A T H 35 of finners. For thus it Is written, /, even I am Jehavah, and hejldes me there is no Saviour. Jefus Chrift not only profefTes to fave finners, but he calls himfelf the Saviour, hf way of eminence. Hence it is evident, that he affumes a a charafter in the moft emphatical way, which the God of Ifrael had challenged and appropriated to himfelf. The divine titles, which are afcribed to the Son in fcripture ^re. The true God. i of John v. 20. The mighty God. Ifai. ix. 6. The Alpha and Omega, the jirji and the lojl. Rev. i. 8. The God over all bleffed forever more. Rom. ix. 5. And Thomas calls Chrift, after his refurre6^ion, his Lord and God, The titles given to Chrift in the New Teftament, are the fame with thofe which are given to God in the Jewifh fcriptures. The name Jehovah y* which is appropriated to God, Pfalm Ixxxiii. 18. Ifai. xiv. 5. is given to Chrift. See Ifai. xiv. 23, 25 compared with Rom. xiv. 12. Ifai. xi. 3 compared with Luke i. 76. Jefus is the perfon fpo- ken of by St. John, whofe glory Efaias is declared to have feen, when he affirms he faw the Lord of hofts. Therefore Jefus is the Lord of hofts. The attributes, which are fornetimes appropiated to God, are applied to Chrift. Omnifcience is afcribed to Chrift. John xvi. i o. Noio we are Jure that then knoweji all things. To be the fearcher of the heart, is the peculiar and diftinguiftiing chara6leriftic of the one true God, as appears from Jer. xvii. 10. Yet our bleffed Lord claims this perfe(flion to himfelf. I am he, faith he, that Jearcheth the reins and the heart. Rev. ii. 23, Omni-prefence • It has been obferved by critics on the word Jehovah, that the firft fy liable Jahy means the divine cflence, and that by ho'vah may be underftood, calamity, grief, deftrudion. Hence fome have fuppofed, the defign of that venerable name was to convey unto us the ideas of a divine effence in a human frame, and a fuffcrin^ and crucified Meffiah, 36 A T H Oninlprefence, another divine attribute, is afcribcd 1^ Chrilt. Matt, xviii. 20. U^'here tiuo or three are gathered together in juy namey there am /, hi the midji of them. Immutability is afcribcd to Chrift. Heb. i. 10, 11, 12. ^hou art the fame y and thy years f jail not fail. This is the very defcription which the Pfalmift gives of the immutabi- lity of the only true God. JSec alfo Heb. xiii. 8. Eternity is afcribcd to Chrift. Rev. i. 8. The Son's be- ing Jehovah, is another proof of his eternity, that name ex- pre fling neceffciry exiflence, Chriil: is alfo faid to have almighty power. Heb. i. 3. See alfo Phil. 3, 21, &c. The truth and faithfulnefs pf God are afcribcd to Cbrift. / aniy fays he, the truths dco. Divine works are alfo afcribcd to Chrift, viz. creationt prefervation, zndforgivenefs of fins. There are numerous texts of fcripture. which affert that Chrilt is the creator of all things. See Heb. i. 10. Thou Lord in the beginning haft laid the foundation -of the earthy and if)* heavens are the zuork of thy hands. See alfo Rev. iii. 14. 1 of Cor. viii. 6. and various other palfages. The work of creation is every where in fcripture, repre* fented as the mark and charaderiftic cf the true God. See 2 of Kings xix. ic;. Job xxii. 7. Pfalmxix. i. Hence it is evident that Chriif, the creator, is the true God. Prefervation is afcribcd to Chrifl Heb. i. 3. Uphold- ing all things by the zvord of his power, Chrift himfelf fays, in Matt, ix. 6. The Son of man hath poiver on earth to forgive fins. Chrift'c being appointed the fupreme Judge of the world, is an evidence that he ir. the true God. The GoD of If- fael is emphatically ftyled, the Judge of all."* Religious • Sec Mr, Alexunder's kte May on the Real Deity of Jcfus PhriA, A T H 37 Religious worfhip, though appropiated to God, was by- divine approbation and command given to Chrift. Heb. i. 6. The apoIUe fpeaking of Chrift, fays, Let the angels of God worjlnp him. See alfo Luke xxiv. 25. John v. 23. Rev. i. 5, 6. v. 13, &c. The fcripturc every where alTerts that God alone is to be worfhipped. The fame fcripture afferts that our bleffed Sa- viour is to be worihipped. Thus St. Stephen adores him with dirccl worfhip : Lord^ejus receive viy Jpirlt. The obvious confequence of which is, our blefTed Saviour is God. This denomination allege, that divine titles, attributes, works, and worftiip, are alfo afcribed to the Holy Ghoft. Many plead that the Holy Spirit is called Jehovah in the Old Teftament, by comparing A(?ts xxviii. 23. with Ifai. vi. 9. And he alfo appears to be called God. A6ls v. 4. Eternity is clearly the property of the Holy Ghoft, who is ftyled, by the author of the epiftle to the Hebrews, ih eternal Spirit. Heb. ix. 14. Omniprefence is a neceffary proof of divinity. This at- tribute belongs to the Holy Spirit ; for thus faith the infpi- red poet, JVJnther Jhalll go from thy Spirit ? Pfalm cxxxix. 7. Omnifcience is afcribed to the Spirit, i of Cor. ii. 10. Tor the Spirit fearcheth all things ^ even the deep things ofGoT>, St. Paul declares, that his ability to work all manner of ' aftoniftiing miracles, for the confirmation of his miniftry, was imparted to him by the Spirit. Rom. xv. 19. The fame a£l of divine grace, viz. our fpiritual birth, is afcribed without the change of a fmgle letter to God and the Spirit. John ii. I. I of John v. 4. The chief texts produced to prove that divine worfhip is given to the Spirit are. Matt, xxiii. 19. Ifai. vi. 3, com- pared with verfe 9. Afts xxviii. 25, — &c. Rom ix. i. Rev. i. 4. 2 of Cor. xiii. 14. There are various texts of fcripture, in which. Father, Son, -8 A U 3 Son, and Spirit, are mentioned together, and rcprefcntei under diftind pcrfonal chara6ters. At the baptifm of Chrift, the Father fpeaks with an au- dible voice, the Son in human nature is baptized by John, and the Holy Ghoft appears in the fhape of a dove. Matt. iii. 1 6, 17. The Trinity of perfons in the Godhead appears from our baptifm, becaufe it is difpenfed in ths name of the Father^ of the Son, and of the Holy Ghoft, The Trinity of perfons alfo appears from the apoftolic be- nedidlion, The grace of the Lord Jefus, the lave of GoDf and the cormminion of the Holy Ghoft he with you all, Amen, i of Cor. xiii. 14. And alfo from the teftimony of the three in heaven, contained in i of John, v. 7. The Trinity in Unity Is one Supreme Being, diftinguifhed from all others by the name Jehovah. Deut. vi. 4. The Lord our God is one Jehovah. Yet Chrift is Jehovah. Jer. xxiii. 6. So is the Spirit. Ezek. viii. i, 3. Therefore Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, are one Jehovah. They are three perfons, but have one Jiame, and one nature. IVaterland^ s Sermons, f, 34, 69, 97, 164. Vindication of Chrifs Divinity, p, 263, 269. Seed*s Sermons, njol. z. /. 420. Doddridge* s LeSiures, p. 392. Willard's Body of Di'vinity, p. lOO. Hsr'vey^s Letters, p. 103, 104. Joneses DoSirine oj the Trinity, p. 2, 34, 62, 69. Abbadit on the Di'vinity ofCbriJt.p. 58, 65, 242. R.obinfon*s Plea. Mather on the Word Jeho:^s^^^l9011. 46. BERENGARIANS, a denomination in the eleventh cea- tury, which adhered to the opinions of Berengarius, -who aflerted that the bread and wine in the Lord's fupper, aie not really and efTentially, but figuratively changed into the body and blood of Chrift. His followers were divided in opinion as to the Euchariji, They all agreed, that the elements are not efTentially chan- ged, though fome allowed them to be changed in eiFedl, Others admitted a change in part ; and others an entire change, with this reftri£lion, that to thofe who communi- cated unworthily,the elements were changed back again. Di^ionary of Arts and Sciences, 'vol, i. p, 289. BERYLLI ANS. So called from Bcryllus, an Arabian, bifhop * The late Rev, William Law, who was a warm admirer of Behman, has improved upon his fyftem, and rendered it more in- tellgible. For an accoant of his fenumencs« fee the Article Myflics, 48 BON bifhop of Bozrah, who fiourifhed in the third century. He' taught that Chrift did not exifl: before 71/^ ry, but that a fpi- rit ilTuing from God himfelf, and therefore fuperior to all human fouls, as being a portion of the divine nature, was united to him at the time of his birth. Mflpeim's EccUftajiical H:Jiory, vcl. I. p. 248, BiDDELI ANS. So called fromJohnBiddle,who in the year 1644, ere£led an independent congregation in London. He taught that JefusChrifl:,to the intent hemight be our bro- ther, and have a fellow-feeling of our infirmities, and fo be- come the more ready to help us, hath no other than a hu- man nature ; and therefore in this very nature is not only a perfon, fince none but a human perfon can be our brother ; but alfo our Lord and God. Biddle, as well as Socinus, and other Unitarians, before and fince, made no fcruple of calling Chrift, God, though he believed him to be a human creature only, on account of the divine fovereignty, with which he was inverted. [See Socinians.] Lind^eyU Vienu cfthz Unitarian Dc^rine and Wor/hipy />. 289. EOGOMlLES, a denomination in the twelfth century, which fprung from the Maffalians. They derived their name from the divine viercyy which its members are faid to have inceilantly implored ; for the word BogomileSf in the Myfian language, fignifies calling out for mercy from above, Baftliusy a monk at Conftantinoplc, was the fountain of this denomination. The dodrines he taught were fimilar with thofe of the Manicheans and Gnoftics. [See Gnoftics and Manicheans.] Mojheim's EccUCiaftical Hijioryt I'oL 2. p. 444. BONOSIANS, a denomination in the third century, %vho followed the opinions ofBonofus, bifhop of Sardica. Their B O R 49 Their fentiments were the fame with the Photinians, though they appear to have been different communions. [See Photinians.] BroughtotCs Hiftorical Library, rjoU l.p. 169. BORRELISTS, a denomination in Holland, Co called from their leader, one Adam Borreel, of Zealand, who had fome knowledge of the Hebrew, Greek, and Latin tongues. They rejeft the ufe of churches, of thefacramenfSy public grayer, and all other external a(51:s of worfhip. They aflert that all the chriftian churches of the world have degenerated from the pure apoftolical dodrihes. They lead a very auftere life, and employ great part of their goods in alms and works of piety. Broughton, ibid. p. 170. BORTGNONISTS, a denomination in the feventeenth century, which fprang from the famojis Antoinette Bourignon de la Ponte^ a native of Flanders^ who pretended to be divinely infpired, and fet apart to revive the true fpirit ofChrfftian- ity, that had been extinguilhed by theological animofities and debates. In her confeflion of faith, flie profefTes her belief in the fcriptures, the divinity, and atonement of Chrift. The predominate, diftinguifliing, principle which runs through her producftions, is as follows. ^hat the chrijlian religion neither confijls in knowledge nor in practice t but in a certain internal feeling and divine impulfe^ which arifes immediately from communion with the Deity, She allowed a general toleration of all religions.^ Dufrefnoy^s Chronological tables, 'vol. 2. p. 253. Mojheim^s Eccle/iajiical HiJ}ory, fvol. 5./). 64. 65, Mrs, Bourignon*s Letters, G BOURNEANS. • Mrs. Bourignon, according to her Utters, fuiFered much per* fecutioa on account of her religion^ 50 B O U BOURNEANS. So they may be called from the Rev, Mr Samuel Bourn, who taught, that the final punHhment threatened in the gofpel to the wicked and impenitent, is not an eternal prefcrvation in mifery and torment ; but a total extinction of life and being : And that the fentence of eternal death, or annihilation, Iball be executed with more, or lefs torment preceeding, or attendmg the final period, in proportion to the greater or lefs guilt of the criminal. In defence of this fyllem it is argued, that there are many palfages of fcripture, in which the ultimate punifh- ment to which wicked men fhall be adjudged, is defined in the mod precife and intelligible terms, to be an evcrlajVing defiruB ion from the power of GoD, which is equally able to dellroy, as to preferve. So when our Saviour is fortifying the minds of his difciples againft the power of men, by an awe of the far greater power of God, and the punifliment of his juftice ; he expreifes himfelf thus : F^ar not them that hill the body, and after that have no more that they can do ; fear hi?n -who is ahle to dtjlroy hoth fsul and body in hell. Here he plainly propofes the deftrudion of the foul (not its end- Icfs pain and mifery,) as the ultimate objc61: of the divine difpleafure, and greateft cbjed of our fear. And when he fays, Thefe f!)aU go azvay into everlafling pv.vij])7ncnt, but the righteous into life eternal^ it appears evident, that, by that €ternal punijhmenty which is fet in oppofition to cternalUfe, is not meant any kind of life however miferable, hut the fame which the apodle exprefies by everlafling defi ruction from the prefence and power of the Lord. The very term, death y is jnoft frequently made ufe of, to fignify the end of wicked men in another world, or the final effcCl of divine juftice in their punilhment. The wages of fin y faith the apofile, is death, but eternal life is the gift o/GoD through Chrifi Jefus $ur Lord. See alfo Rom. viii. 6. To imagine, that by the term, death, is meant an eternal life, though in a condition of extreme mifery, fecms to be confounding all propriety and meaning of words. Death, when. 5 O U I 5f Vfhen applied to the end of wicked men In a future ftate, pro- perly denotes a total extincSlion of life and being. It may contribute to fix this meaning, if we obfcrve that the Hate to which temporal death reduces men, is iifually termed by our Saviour and his apoftles, fleep : becaufe from this death the foul fhall be raifed to life again ; but from the other, which is fully and properly death, and of which the forraer is but an image or fhadow, there is no recovery ; it is an eternal death f an evcrlafung deflru5lionjrGm the prejence of the Lord and the glory of his power. If we proceed to the figures by which the eternal punifn- ment of wicked men is defcribcd, we Ihall find them per- fe6lly agreeing to eltablifh the fam.e do6lrine. One figure or comparifon often ufed, is that of combufiible materials thrown into a fire, which will confequently be entirely con- fumed, if the fire be not quenched. Depart fra7n me, ye ciir- fed J into everlajiing fire^ prepared for the devil and his angels. The meaning is, a total irrevocable deftru<5lion. For as the tree that bringeth forth not good fruity is hewn doivn and cajl into the fircy and is deftroyed ; as the ufelefs chaff, when fe- parated from the good grain, is fet on fire, and if the fire be not quenched, is confumed ; fo it plainly appears, that the image of unquenchable, or everlafling fire, is not intended to fignify the degree, or duration of torment, but the abfo- lute certainty of deftru6lion, beyond all poffibility of a reco- very. So the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are faid to have fuffered the vengeance of an eternal fire ; that is, they were fo effedually confumed and deilroyed ; that they couki never be rebuilt : the expreflion of eternal f re fignifylng the irrecoverable deftru^tion of thofe cities, not the degree or duration of the mifery of the inhabitants who perKhed. The images of the worfn that diet h not, and the fire that /> r^ot quench edy ufed in Mark ix. 4.3, are fct in oppofition tu entering into life : and intended to denote a period of life and cxiitence. Our iZ . B R E Our Saviour exprefsly afligns different degrees of future xnifery, in proportion to men's refpedlive degrees of guilt. Luke xii. 47, 48. But if all wicked men (hall fuffer tor- ments without end, how can any of them be faid to fuffer but a few ftripes ? All degrees and diftinflioas of punifh- ment feem fwallowed up in the notion of never ending oy infinite mifery. Let it be obferved alfo, that death and eternal deftrudion, or annihilation, is properly ftyled in the New Teftament an everlafting puniOiment, as it is irrevocable and unalterable forever, and it is moft ftriflly and literally llyled, an ever- lafting dejiruftion frem the prefence of the Lord, and from the glory ofhispozver. Bourn's Sermons, 'voL I p. 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 391, 392, 395. BRETHREN AND SISTERS OF THE FREE SPI- RIT. They, in the thirteenth century, gained ground im- perceptibly, in Italy, France, and Germany. They took their denomination from the words of St. Paul, Rom. viii. 2, 14, and maintained, that the true children of God were inverted with the privilege of a full and perfe6l: freedom from the jurifdi6lion of the law. They were called by the Germans and Flemifh, Beghards and Beguttes ; which was a name given to thofe who make an extraordinary pro^. fcfhon of piety and devotion. The fentiments taught by this denomination, were as follow. That all things flowed by emanation from God, and were finally to return to their divine fource. — That rational fouls were fo many portions of the Supreme Deity ; and that the univcrfe confidered as one great whole, was God. — That every man, by the power of contemplation, and by calling off his mind from fenfible and terreflrial objedls, might be united to the Deity in an ineffable manner 5 and be^ *" "•• • come B R O 53 ome one with the Source and Parent of all things. And that they, who, by long and afhduous meditation, had plun- ged themfelves, as it were, into an abyfs of the divinity, acquired thereby a moft glorious and fublime liberty, and were not only delivered from the violence of fmful lu{ls> but even from the corrimon inflinds of nature. From thefe, and fuch like Qo£lrines, the Brethren under confidcration, drew this contlufion, viz. That the perfon who had afccnded to God in this manner, and was abforb- ed by contemplation in the abyfs of Deity, became thus a part of the Godhead — commenced God — was the Son of God in the fame fenfe and manner that Chrift was, and was thereby raifed to a glorious independence, and freed from the obligation of all laws, human and divine. In confequence of this, they treated with contempt the ordinances of the gofpel, and every external a£l of religious worfhip, looking upon prayer, fafting, baptifm,and the fa- crament of the Lord's fupper, as the firft elements of piety, adapted to the capacity of children, and as of no fort of ufe to the perfeSt many whom long meditation had raifed above all external things, and carried into the bofom and eflencc of the Deity. They rejected with horror every kind of induftry and la- bor, as an obftacle to divine contemplation, and to the af- cent of the foul towards the Father of fpirits. Mojheim^s Ecclejtajlical Hijiary ^ njol. 3./>. 122, 123, 124. BROWNISTS, a denomination which fprung up in England towards the end of the fixteenth century. They derive their name from Robert Brown, a native of North- ampton. This denomination did not difFer in point of doftrine, from the church of England, or from the other Puritans ; but they apprehended, according to fcripture, that every church ought to be confined within the limits of a fingle congregation. 54 C A I congregation ; and that the government fhould be demo- cratical. They maintained the difcipline of the church of England to be popifh and antichriflian, and all her ordinan- ces and facraments invalid. Hence they forbade their peo- ple to join with them in prayer, in hearing the word, or in any part of public worlhip. They not only renounced com- munion with the church of England, but with all other chur^ ches, except fuch as were of the fame model. Mopeim, ibid, fvoU 4. />. 98. Neal^s Hifiory of the. Puritans, . 190. CALIXTINS, a branch of the HufTites in Bohemia and Moravia in the fifteenth century. The principal point in which they difFeied from the church of Rome, was the ufe of the Chalice, (Calix) or communicating in both kinds. Calixtins was alfo a name given to thofe among the Lu- therans, who followed the opinions of George Calixtus, a celebrated divine in the feventeenth century ; who endea^ voured to unite the Romifh, Lutheran, and Calviniftic churches, in the bonds of charity and mutual benevolence. He maintained, I. That the fundamental doBrines of Chrljiianify, by which he meant thofe elementary principles whence all its truths flow, were prefcrved pure in all three communions, and were contained in that ancient form of do£lrine, that is vulgarly known by the name of the Apojiles Creed. W. That the tenets and opinions which had been con- ftantly received by the ancient dodors, during the nrft five centuries, were to be confidered as of equal truth and autho- rity with the exprefs declarations and doctrines of fcripture. Broughtoiiy tbidy p, 192. Mopehn^s Ecclejiajiical HiJ}ory, 'vol. 4. p, 450, 45 i» CALVINISTS. They derive their name from John Calvin, who was born at Nogen, in Picardy, in the year 1509. He firfl: ftudied the civil law, and was afterwards madeprofeiforof divinity at Geneva, in the year 1536. His genius, learning, and eloquence, rendered him refpeiflablc even in the eyes of his very enemies. The principle tenets of the Calvinifts are comprehended in five articles, to which are added a few of the arguments *hey make ufe of in defence of their fentiments. I. That God has chofen a certain numher in Chriil, unto everlafling 56 C A L evcrlaftlng glory, before the foundation of the world, ac- cording to his immutable purpofe, and of his free grace 2Lnd love, without the leaft forefight oifaifh, good worksy or any conditions performed by the creature : and that the reft of mankind he was pleafed to pafs by, and ordain them to dif- honor and wrath for their fms, to the praife of his vindic- tive juftice. For, as the Deity is infinitely perfe£l and independent in all his adls, the manifeftation of his efTential perfections muft be the fupreme end of the divine counfels and defigns. Prov. xvi. 4. The Lord hath made all things for himfelf, ^c. Since God is omnifcient, it is evident that he forefaw from everlafting whatever fhould come to pafs : but there can be no prefcience uf future contingents ; for what is certainly forefeen, muft infallibly come to pafs ; confequently the prefcience of the Deity cannot be antecedent to his decrees. The facred fcripturcs aftert the do6lrine of the divine fovereignty in the cleareft terms. Rom. ix. 2t. Has mi the potter poiver over the clay of the fame lumpy to tnahe one 'wf- Jel unto honor, and another unto dijhonor. See from verfe 1 1 to the end of the chapter. The fame divine author pre- fents us with a golden chain ol falvation in Rom. viii. 30. To the fame purport fee Eph. i. 4. A6ls xiii. 48, and a variety of other palTages in the facred oracles. II. That Jefus Chrift, by his death and fufFerings, made an atonement for the fins of the ele£l only. That is, that redemption is commenfurate with the di- vine decree. Chrift has abfolutely purchafed grace, holi- iiefs, and all fpiritual bleflings for his people. For, if God really intended the falvation of all men, tlien no man can perifti. For the counfel of the Lord Jlan^ dcth forever. Pfalm xxxiii. 11. Fhere are exprefs texts of fcrlpture which teftify that Chrift did not die for all men. John vi. 37 . All that the Father giveth me^Jhall come to me, tSc, and in John x. 11, Chrift ftyles himfclf, The good Jhepm kerdp C A L 57 %erd, who lap down his life for his Jhecp This is a^fo im- plied in our :)aviour's liiniiation ot his iniercellion. Joha Xvii. 9. To fuppofe that the death of Chrif^ procured only a pof- fibility of falvation which depend*: upon onr performance of certain conditions, is contradictory to tht^fe fcriptures which alfert that faivation is Wholly owing U) free fwcreign grace. If Chrilt died for all, and all arc not faved. the pur- pofes of his death are in many inllances fruftratcd, and he fhed his precious blood in vain To fuppofe this would be derogatoiy to the infinite perf,^(^fons of the great Redeemer, Therefore he did not die for ail, and all for whom he died will certainly be faved. III. That mankind are totally depraved iti confeqnence of the fall ; and by virtue o{ Adam<> being their public head, the guilt oi his fin was imputed, and a corrupt nature con- veyed to «//his poflerity, from which proceed aU actual tranf- gre (lions : And that h^ftn we are made fubjeflt 10 death, and all miferies, temporal, fpiriiual, and eternal. For the infpired page? alfert the original dep'-avity o£ mankind in the moft emphatical terms. Gen viii 21. l^he imagination of man s heart is evil fr<,m his youth. Pfalm xiv. 2, 3. l.he Lor. looked down from heaven upon thechiU dren of men, to fee if there wre any that did underfland and feek after God . They are all gone ajtde, they are altogether le-> come fit hy ; there is none that doeth good, no not one. To the fame purport fee Rom iii. 10, 1 1, f 2, &:c. And it is evi- dent, that Adam's fin was imputed to his pofterity, from Rom, V. 19. Byoneman*s di fob ed'encc many were made ftn^ ners, &c. The fcriptures alfo teach, that all fin expofes us to evcrlafting deftru^lion. See Gal. iii. 10. 2 of Cor. iii, 6, 7. And Rom. iv, 14. The total depravity of human nature is alfo evident fronri the univerfal reign of death over perfons of all ages — From the propenfity to evil which appears in mankind, and im« H peb 58 C A L pels them to tranfgrefs God's law. — From the neceHity of regeneration. — The nature of redemption.— And the re- mains of corruption in the faints. IV. That all whom God has predeftinated unto life, he is pleafed, in his appointed time, effedualUy to call by his word 2Lndfplrit, out of that eftate offm and death, in which they are by nature, to grace 2,nd/alvation by Jefus Chrifl. For an irrefiftible operation is evident from thofe paiTa* ges in fcripture, which exprefs the efficacious virtue of di- vine grace in the converfion of finners. Eph. i. 19. Jnd what is the exceeding greatnejs of his power towards us who be- lieve, &c. Eph. ii. I, 5. JPhil, ii. 13. and divers other paiTages. If there was any thing in us which renders the grace of God effedual, we fhould have caufe for boafting ; but the facred pages declaim againft this in the moft empha- tical terms. Rom. v. 27. Where is boajting then? It is excluded, &c. See Titus iii. 5. i of Cor. i. 31. and a va- riety of other texts to the fame purport. If the free will of man renders grace effe/flualf it may be made ineffe^fualhy \.\\q fame power, and fo the creature fruf- trate the defigns of his Creator ; which is derogatory to the infinite perfections of that omnipotent Being, who worketh all things according to the counfel cf his will. V. That thofe whom God has effeflually called and ianflified by his fpifit, (hall never finally fall from a ftatc of grace. For this dodrine is evident from the promifes of perfe- vering grace in the facred fcriptures. Ifai. liv. 10. For the 77iounlains fnall depart, and the hills he renioijed, hut my hndncfs jhall not depart frohi thee, neither fh all the covenant of tny peace he removed, faith the LoRD, that hath mercy on thee. See alfo Jer. xxxii. 3S, fO. John iv. 14. vi. 39. x. 28. xi. 26. And the apoftle exclaims with triumphant rapture, / am perfaadcd that neither life, nor death, isc.fiall he ahle iy frparaie C A L 5^ f'iparate us from the hve g/"GoD, which is in Chri/i Jefus our Lord, Rom. viii. 38. 39. The perfeverance of the faints is alfo evident from ihe immutability of the Deity ; his piirpofes and the reaf )ns oa which he founds them are invariable as hi mfelf. JVtth him their is no variahlenefs or fnadozo of turning. James i. 17. The faithfulnefs of the Deity is ever difplayed in perform- ing his promifes ; but the do6lrineof falling from grace fruf- trates the defign of the promifes. For if one faint may fall, why not another, and a third, till no fmcere Chriftians are left. But the doctrine of the believer's perfeverance remains firm, as it is fupported by the exprefs tenor of fcripture, the immutability of the Deity, and his faithfulnefs in perform- ing his promifes, Thefe are the five points vphich diftinguifh this denomi* nation from the Arminians. The Calviniftic fyftem alfo includes in it, the doc^lrine of three co-ordinate perfons in the Godhead forming one nature, and of two natures in Je- fus Chrill: forming one perfon. Juflification by faith alone, and the imputed righteoufnefs of Chrirt form an elTential part of this fyftem. They fuppofe, that on the one hand, our fins are imputed to Chrift, and on the other, that we are juftified by the imputation of Chrift's righteoufnefs to us ; i. e. we the guilty are treated by God as righteous perfons, out of regard to what Chrill has done and fuffered ; who, though perfedlly innocent, was appointed to fuffer by the imputation of our fins to him. The Calvinifts fuppofe that the doflrine of Chrift's fuffering in the place of finners is ftrongly exprelTed in a variety of paiTages in fcripture. As Ifai. liii. 4, 5, 6. He has home our griefs, and carried ourforrows — He vjas wounded for our tranjgreffionsy he was hruifedfor our iniquities^ the chajlifement of our peace was upon him t and with his firipes ive are healed. i of Pet. ii, 25. IVho hirafelf h^re our fins in his own body on the tree, that W-v, being dead untofm^Jhould live wito righteoufnefs. There are ^io 4 number of texts to the fame imoort. The ^0 © A R The piinifhment Infli£led on Ghrift was requlfite to thft plenary pavmcnt of an infinite debt Mujo.im^\i Ecc ejiaflual Hijioty, voL 3. /. 352. *V9L 4, f. 7©^ Cuinjins InJii'uticnSy p IZJ. Jjjem6/v's ConfrJJion of Faith y f, 35, 36, 48, 49, 67. Char ock s Works, 'vol 2 p. 1353, 1354. ^ivjfes Wcrki, p^ 225. i) cior Eii'i'-a-ds^s Vantai Redux, p. 56, 89, 91 , 92, 319, 32©^ 32!, 358, 384, 390 450. Bdwatis an O'ginal Sin, p. 13, 40, 356, 366. Broughtoni Hijiorical Library, 'voL i» p, 195, Top lady s Wo>ks. CAMISARS. [See French Prophets.] CAPUTIATI, a denomination which appeared in the twelfth century ; fo called fr(;ni a fingular kind of cap ^hich diftinguilhed their party. They wore upon their caps a leaden image of the Virgin Mary, and declared publicly that their purpofe was to level all dillinflions, to abrogate magiflracy and to remove ad fubordination among man- kind, and to reftore that pi 'mitive liberty, that natural equa- lity, which were the ineidmable privileges of the firft xnortals. MoJh«im*s Eccleftaflical Hijiory, ^vol. 2. /. 456. 457. C\ROLOSr\DIANS. So called fjom Caroloftadtp ;^ colleague of Luther. He denied the real prefence in the Muchariji ; and declaime^d againfl human learning. Mojhe.m s Ecilefiajiical Hijtory, vol. 4. /. 28, 30. C \RPOCR ATI ANS. a denomination which arofe to- wards the middle of the fecond century ; fo called from Carpocraics, whofe philofophlral tenets agreed in general with thofe of the Ei^yptian Gnoftics. He acknowledged the exiftence of a Supreme God, and of the Mons derived irom him by fucceflive generations. He maintained the ^ternity of a corrupt matler, and the creation of the world froni C A T 6% from thence by angelic powers, as alfo the divine origin of fouls unhappily iinprifoned in mortal bodies, Sec. He afferted, that Jefus wa«; born of Jojeph and Mary^ ac- cording to the ordinary eourfe of nature, and was diftin- guilhed from the red of mankind by nothing but his fuper rior fortitude and greatncfs of foul. It is faid, he held, that lurts and paflions, being implanted in our nature by God himfclf, were confequently void of guilt, and had no- thing in them criminal ; and not only allowed his difciples full liberty to fin. but recommended to them a vicious courfc of life, as a matter both of obligation and necefTity, aiTerting that eternal falvation was only attainable by thofe who had committed all forts of crimes, and had daringly filled up the meafure of iniquity.* He alfo taught that all things (hould be polfeired in common. [See Gnodics.] Mojheim, ibid, 'vol, 4. ^. 184., 1S5;. CATAPHRYGIANS. [See Montanifts.] CATHARISTS, a branch of the Manicheans, in the twelfth century. This denomination agreed in the follow- ing points of doftrine,viz That matter wasthefource of all evil. That the Creator of this world was a being diflinft from the fupreme Deity. That Chrift was not clothed with a real body, neither could be properly faid to have been born, or to have feen death. That human bodies were the produf^ion of the evil principle. That baptifm and the Lord's fupper were ufelefs inftitutions ; and that human fouls endued with reafon, were fliut up by aji unhappy fate in the dungeons of mortal bodies, whence only they could be delivered by fading, mortification, and continence of every kind. Hence they exhorted all who embraced their do£lrine, to a rigorous abflinence from animal food, v/ine, ^nd wedlock, and recommended to them, in the moft pathe- tic • Such is the rrpre^entation, which ecclcfiaftlcal hiftorians in general give of the morals of this denomination. Dr. Lardner, however, difputes its authenticity. It is difficult to obtain a true 9iCC0un( of ancient fe6\s, as their writings are chieHy lod. 6i C E K tic terms, the mod fev.erea£ls of auflerity and mortification. This denomination treated all the books of the Old Tef- tament with the utmoft contempt, but exprefTed a high ve^ neration for the New, particularly for the four Evangeltfls. Mojkeim's Ecclefiajiicat HiJIory, ^jol. 2. p. 444. CERDONIANS, a branch of the Gnoftics in the fecond century, which derive their name from Ccrdo. They are alfo called Marcionites, from Marcion, who propagated his doftrines with altonilhing fuccefs throughout the world. The fentiments taught by this denomination were as follow. That there are two principles, the one perfe(flly goodj, and the other perfectly evil. And between thefe there is an intermediate kind of Deity, neither perfectly good, ncr perteifVIy evil, but of a mixed nature ; and fo far juft and powerful, as to adminifter rewards and inflidl punifhments. This '.mddle Deily is the creator of this inferior world, and the God and legiflator of the Jewifh nation. He wages perpetual war with the evil Principle. And'both the one and the other afpire to the place of the Supreme Being, and am.bitioufly attempt fubjefling to their authority all the in- habitants of the world. The Jews are the fubjeds of that powerful genius who formed the globe. The other nations who worfhip a vari- ety of Gods, are under the empire of the evil Principle. — ■ Both thcfc conflifling powers exercife oppreihons upon ra- tional and immortal fouls, and keep them in a tedious and miferable captivity. Therefore, the Supreme God, in or- der to terminate this war, and to deliver from their bondage thofe fouls, whofe origin is celeftial and divine, fent to the Jews a being mod like to himfelf, even his Son Jcfus Chrift, clothed with a certain fhadowy refemblance of a body, that thus he might be vifible to mortal eyes. The commiflion of this celeftial meflengcr was to deftrov the empire both of the C E R 63 {tie evil Princlpl^f znd of the Author of this world, and to bring back wandering fouls to God. On this account he was attacked with inexpreflible fury by the Pri7ice of Dark- liefsy and by the God of the JewSy but without effe. 197. 213 215, 242, 243, CONONITES, a denomination which appeared in the fixth century. They derive their name from Conon, bifhop of Tarfus He taught that the body never lofl its form, that its matter alone was fubje<5l to corruption and decay, and was to be reitored when this mortal fhall put on immortality. In other points they agree with the Philoponifts. [See Philoponifts and Tritheiits.] Moj'heim's Eccleftajiical Hifiory, 'vol. i. /. 473. COPHTES, Chriftians of Egypt, Nubia, and the adja- cent countries. Their fentiments are fimilar with the Ja- cobites. [See Jacobites. See alfo Part II.] Father Suaons' Religion of the Eajiern 1\ at ions, p, 1 10. CORRUPTICOLiE, a denomination which arofe in the fixth century. They derived their name from their maintaining, that the body of Chrift was corruptible, that the fathers had owned it, and that to deny it was to deny the truth of our Saviour's paflion. Di£ii07iaty of Arts and Sciences, . 206, 207. DAVIDISTS, a denomination in the fixteenth centu- ry ; fo called from David George, a native of DeJftt who acquired great reputation by his prudent converfation. He deplored the decline of vital and pra6lical religion, and endeavoured to reftore it among his followers. But rejec- ted, as mean and ufelefs, the external fervices oi piety. He was charged with afferting, that he was the third Da- vid, fon of Go 13 ; arnd that he ought to fave men by grace, and not by death : and with denying the exigence of an* gels and demons, the authority of the fcriptures, and the rerurre6lion of the body. MoJJje'nns Ecchjiafiied Hiflory^nioU 4.^. 164, 165. Crojhy's Htjiory of the Englijh Baptifist moL I. p. 64. Bufrefnofi Chronological Tables, fvol, 2. p. 249. DIGGERS, a denomination which fprung up in Gcr. many in the fifteenth century j fo called, becaufe they dug their 72 fi U L their alTemblies under ground, in caves and forefts. The/ derided the church, its minifters, and facraments. Brcughtai} $ Hjlorical Library, . DIMOERITES. [See Appcllinarians.] DOCET^^, a denomination in the firft and fecond cen- turies \ {o called from the Greek of (xtto tou ^oxhv to appear, becaufe they held that Jefus Chrifi: was born, lived in the world, died, and roie again, not in reality, but in appear^ ance only. It v\^as the common opinion ot" the Gnoftics, [See Gnoftics.] Broughttint ihiJ. p. ^T^c), DONATISTS, a denomination which arofe in the fourth century. They derived their name from Donatus, biihop of Numidia. They maintained, that their community was alone to he confidered as the true church, and avoided all communlca^ tion with other churches, from an apprehcnfion of contrac- ting their impurity and corruption. Hence they pronoun- ced the facred rites and inftitutions void of all virtue and efEcacy among thofc Chriftians, who were not precifely of their fentiments, and not only re-baptized thofe who came over to their party from other churches, but with refpefl to thoffe who bad been ordained minifters of the gofpel, they either deprived them of their office, or obliged them to be .ordained the fecond time. Mofheirn*! tcdefiajiical Hijiory y 'vol. \. p. 333. DULCINISTS, the followers of Dulcinus, a layman, 'of Novara, in Lombardy, about the beginning of the four^ tcenth century. He taught that the law of the Father, which had continued till Mofes, was a law of grace and wifdom, but that the law of the Holy Ghofl:, which began with himfelf in the year 1307, was a law entirely of love, which would laft to the end of the world. UronghlWi UiJ}ori:ol Lihary, 'vol. I. p- 344. DUNKERS, ft U N 7j DUNKERS, a denomination which took its rife in the year 1724, and was formed into a fort of commonwealth, moftly in a fmall town called Ephrata, in or near Pennfyl- vania A German hermit, who fettled on the fpot where Dunkard town, called Ephrata, is now built,was the foun- der of this fociety. They fcem to have obtained iheir name from their baptizing their new converts by plunging. They are alfo called Tumblers, from the manner in which they perform baptifm, which is by putting the perfon, v,'hi]e kneeling, head firfl: under water, fo as to refemble the mo- tion of the body in the action of tumbling. They ufe the triune immerfion, with laying en the hands and prayer, even when the perfon baptifed is in the water. Their habit feems to be peculiar to themfelves, coniifting of a long tu- nic or coat, reaching down to their heels, with a fafh or girdle round the waift, and a cap or hood hanging from the fhoulders, like the drefs of the Dominican friars. The men do not fliave the head or beard. The men and women have feparate habitations, and dif- tinft governments, For thcfe purpofes, they have erefled two large wooden buildings ; one of which is occupied by the brethren, the other by the fillers of the fociety ; and in each of them, there is a banqueting-room, and an apartment for public worfhip ; fur the brethren and fillers do not meet together even at their devotions. They live chiefly upon roots and other vegetables : the rules of their fociety not allowing them fleih, except upon particular occafions, when they hold what they call a love- feaft ; at which time the brethren and fillers dine together in a large apartment, and eat mutton, but no other meat. No member of the fociety is allowed a bed, but in cafe of ficknefs. In each of their little cells they have a bench fixed to ferve the purpofe of a bed, and a fmall block ot wood for a pillow. The Dimkers allow of no intercourfc betwixt the brethren and fillers, not even by marriage. K The 74 D u tq • The prlncii>al tenet of the Bunkers appears to be thiSc, That future happinefs is only to be obtained by penance and outward mortifications in this life ; and that as Jefus Chrilt, by his meritorious fufFerings, became the Redeemer of mankind in general, fo each individual of the human race, by a life of abflinence and reftraint, may work out his own falvation. Nay, they go fo far as to admit of works of fupererogation ; and declare, that a man may do much more than he is in juftice or equity obliged to do ; and that his fuperabundant works may therefore be applied to the falvation of others. This denomination deny the eternity of future punifh- ments ; and believe that the dead have the gofpel preached to them by our Saviour, and that the fouls of the juft are employed to preach the gofpel to thofe who have had no re- velation in this life. — They fuppofe the Jezvijh Jabbath, Jabbatical year, znd year of Jubilee are typical of certain pe- riods after the general judgment, in which the fouls of thofcj who are not then admitted into happinefs, are purified from their corruption. If any within thofe fmaller periods, are fo far humbled, as to acknowledge the perfections of God, and to own Chrift as their only Saviour, they are received to felicity. While thofe who continue obftinate, are refer- ved in torments until the grand period, typified by the Ju- bilee arrives, in which all Hall be made happy in the end- lejfs fruition of the Deity. They alfo deny the im.putation of Adam's fin to his pof- terity. They difclaim violence even in cafes of felf defence^ And fuifer themfelves to be defrauded or wronged, rather than go to law. Their cluirch government and difcipline are the fame with the Englifli Baptifts, except that every brother is al- lowed to fpeak in the congregation, and their befi- fpeaker is ufualiy ordained to be the minifler. They have deacons and V)J at\d deaconefTes from among their ancient widows and ex- horters, who are all licenfed to iife their gifts ftatedly. Cafpipina's Letter s^ />. 70. 7I. 72, ^c. Annual Regijlir, p. 343. Marjhal*s Cutechi/m, p. 90, ^^^ vine of the fixteenth century. The paRoral ofFiCe ac- cording to him was only perfuafive, like a profefTor of fcien- ces over his (Indents, without any power of the keys annex- ed. The Lord's fupper, and other ordinances of the gofpel, were to be free and open to all. The minifter might dif. fuade the vicious and unqualified from the communion, but might 7^ t V S might not refufe it, or infli<^ any kind of cenfurc^ ; the pun* ifhment of all offences^ either of a civil or religious nahjre, Wmg referred to the civil magiftrate. Nial\s Hijiory of the Puritans, njoU 3«/» X40. ETHNOPHRONES, Greek, in EngliOi Paganizers. So rhey called a fedl in the eighth century, who profefling Chriftianity, joined thereto all the ceremonies of Paganifm, fuch as judicial aftrology, divinations, of all kinds, &c. and who obferved all feafts, times, and feafons of the Gentiles. Xhe word is compounded of the Greek L^i>oq nation, and ^cr,v thought or fentiment, Broughton^s H'ljforical Library t njoJ. p, 378. EUCHITES. [See MalTalians.] EUDOXIANS. a branch of the Arians in the fourth century ; fo called from Eudoxus, who after the death of Ariu:>, became head of the party. [See Arians.] Hijiory of Religion i *vol. 4. [See Eudoxians.l EUNOMIANS. [See Arians.] EUSEBI ANS. So called from Eufebius, bifhop of Cs- farea, in Paleftine, in the fourth century. He maintained that there was a certain difparity and fubordination between the perfons of the Godhead. [See Arians,] Mojheim's Ecclefiaftical HiJiory, 'V&l. l. f. 2911. EUSTATHIANS, a denomination in the fourth cen- tury ; fo called from Euftathin?, a monk. He prohibited Hiarriage, the ufe of wine and flcfh, feafts of charity, and other things of that nature. To thofe who were joined in wedlock, he prefcribed immediate divorce. And obliged ^^i5 followers to quit all they had, as incompatible with the hopes of heaven. Mojheims ibid. -p. il-i,. Bay ley's Di^ionary, vol, 2. [5^^ EuJialhiatiJ.'] EUTUCHITES, A M 19 EUTUCHlTKS, a denomination in the third tcntury ; fo called from the Greek ivrv)(^iiu which fignifies, to live without pa'm^ or inpleafure. They held that our fouls are placed in our bodies only to honor the angels who created them. That we ought to re- joice equally in all events, becaufe to grieve would be to diflionor the angels, their creators. They alfo held that Je* fus Chrift was not the Son of God, but of an unknown God. Boughton^s Hijiorical Library y 'voL 2. p. 532. EUTYCHIANS, a denomination in the fifth century ; fo called from Eutyches, a monk and abbot of Con- ftantinople. They maintained, that there was only one nature in Jc- fus Chrift. The divine nature, according to them, had fo entirely fvvallowed up the human, that the latter could not be diftinguiOied. So that Jefus Chrift was merely God, and had nothing of humanity but the appearance. Barclays DiSiionary, [See Eutychians.'l S. AMILISTS, a denomination which appeared in Holland, about the year 1555.* They derive their origin from Henry Nicholas, a Wejiphalian, who ftyled his follow- ers the Family of Love. He pretended he had acommiflion to teach mankind ; and that there was no knowledge of Chrift, nor of the fcriptures, but in \i\s family. To prove this point, he argued from ift of Cor. xiii. 5, ^,10, For we know but in part ^ and we prophefy in part : But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is im- perfect /hall be done away. Hence he inferred that the doc- trine • This denomination appeared in England about the year 1580, where, when their founder tvas difcovered, their books were ordered to be publicly burnt. So F I F trine of Chrid is jmperfefl, and a more perfe^l do6lrine fliould be revealed to the Family of Love. This denomina-. tion alfo taught the following do 2, 3, 4, JO, ll, 25, 28, 3I» ^7i 38, 39, G G N O . Ss AIANITiE, a -denomination which fprang from the Eutychians. They derive their name from Gaian, a bifhop of Alexandria, in the fixth century, who denied that Jefus Chrift, after the hypoftatical union, was fubjedl to any of the infirmities of human nature. Hijiory of Religion 3 hjqL 4. \Zee Gatanir^,} GAZARES, a denomination which appeared about the year 1 197, at Gazare, a town of Dalmatia. They held al- moft the fame opinions with the Albigenfes ; but their diftin- gui(hing tenet was, that no human power had a right to fentence men to death for any crime whatever. Brougbton's Hijiorical Library , I'oL I. p, 558. GEORGIANS. [See Iberians.] GNOSIMACHI, a name which diftlnguiOied thofe in the feventh century, who were profefled enemies to the Gno- fiSi i e. the ftudied knowledge, ox Jcience of Chriftianity ; which they refled wholly on good works, calling it an ufe- lefs labor to feek for knowledge in the fcripture. In fhort, they contended for the pradice of morality in all fimplicity, and blamed thofe who aimed at improving and perfeAing it \>y a deeper knowledge and infight into the doctrines and myftcries of religion. The Gnofimachi were the very reverfe of the Gnofiics. [See Gnoftics.] Broughton^ ibid, p, 599. GNOSTICS. This denomination fprang up in the firft century. Several of the difciples of Simon Magus held the principles of his philofophy, together with the profellion of Chriftianity, and were diftinguifhed by the appellation of Gnoftics, from their boafting of being able to reftore man- kind to the knowledge, ym(Ji<; of the Supreme Being, which had been loft in the world. This party was not confpicu- ous 85 G N O ous for its numbers or reputation before the time of Adri- ^n* It derives its origin from the Oriental philofophy. The do£\rine of a foul, di{lin£t from the body, which had prc-exifted in an angelic llate,and was, for fome offence com- mitted in that ftate, degraded, and confined to the body as z puniihment, had been the great do(5lrine of the eaftern fa- g3s from time immemorial. Not being able to conceive how evil in fo great an extent, could be fubfervient to good, they fuppofed that good and evil have different origins. So mixed a fyflem as this is, they therefore thought to be un- worthy of infinite wifdom and goodnefs. They looked up- on matter as the fource of all evil, and argued in this m.an- ner : There are many evils in this world, and men feem impelled by a natural inftincl, to the pra(5lice of thofe things which reafon condem.ns ; but that eternal Mind, from which sll fpirits derive their exiftence, mud be inaccefiible to all kinds of evil, and alfo of a moft perfedl and beneficent na- ture. Therefore the origin of thofe evils, with which the xiniverfe abounds, m.uft be fought fome where elfe than in the Deity. It cannot refide in him who is all perfeflion ; therefore, it muft be without him. Now there is nothing without or beyond the Deity but matter ; therefore matter is the centre and fource of all evil and of all vice. Having taken for granted thefe principles, they proceeded further, and affirmed, that matter was eternal, and derived its prefent form, not from the will of the fupreme God, but from the *:reating power of fome inferior intelligence, to whom the world and its inhabitants owed their exiftence. As a proof of their affertion, they alleged, that it was incredible the fu- preme Deity, pcrfecElly good, and infinitely removed from all evil, fhould either create, or modify matter, which is ef- ! fentially malignant and corrupt \ or, beftow upon it in any degree, the riches of his wifdom and liberality. In * Under the general appellation of Gnoftics, arc compre- hended all thofe, who in the firft ages of Chriftianity, blended the Oriental philofophy with the doftrines of the gofpeL G N O 87 In their fyftem it was generally fuppofed, that all intel- ligences had only one fource, viz. the diving Mind. And to help out the do£lrine concerning the origin of evil, it was imagined, that though the divine Being himfelf was eflcn- tially and perfedly good, thofe intelligences, or fpirits, who were derived from him, and efpecially thofe who were derived from them, were capable of depravation. Jt was further imagined, that the derivation of thofe inferior intelligent beings from the Supreme, was by a kind of ef- flux or emanation, a part of the fubftance being detached from the reft, but capable of being abforbed into it again.* To thofe intelligences derived mediately or immediately from the divine Mind, the author of this fyftem did not fcruple to give the name of gods, thinking fome of them capable of a power of modifying matter. The oriental fages exped^ed the arrival of an extraojdi- nary meflenger of the Moft High upon earth ; a meflen- ger inverted with a divine authority ; endowed with the moft eminent fan£lity and wifdom ; and peculiarly appoint- ed to enlighten with the knowledge of the Supreme Being, the darkened minds of miferable mortals, and to deliver them from the chains of the tyrants and ufurpers of this world. When therefore fomex)f thefe philofophers perceived that ■Chrift and his followers wrought miracles of the moft amaz- ing kind, and alfo of the moft falutary nature to mankind, they were eafily induced to conneifl their fundamental doc- trines with Chriftianity, by fuppofing him the great meflen- ger expefted from above, to deliver men from the power of the • The great boafl of the Gnofiics, was their doflrine concern- ing the derivation of various intelligences from the Supreme Mii^J, which they thought to be done by e^nanation or effiux. And as thofe were equally capable of producing other intelligences in the fame manner, and fome of them were male, and others female, there was room for endlefs combinations of them. It is fuppo- fed, that the apoftle Paul, when he cenfures endlefs genealogies znd/alfles, has reference to the philofophy of the Gncilics. SS G N O the malignant genii, or fplrits, to whom, according to their doflrine, the world was fubje6led, and to free their fouls from the dominion of corrupt matter. But though they confidered him as the Supreme God, fent from the plero- ma, or habitation of the everlafting Father, they deny his divinity, looking upon him as inferior to the Father. They rejefled his humanity, upon the fuppofition that every thing concrete and corporeal is in itfelf elTentially and intrinfically evil. Hence the greatcft part of the Gnoftics denied that Chrifl: was clothed with a real body, or that he fuffered re- ally for the fake of mankind, the pains and forrows which he is faid to have endured in the facred hiftory. They main- tained, that he came to mortals with no other view, than to deprive the tyrants of this world of their influence upon vir- tuous and heaven born fouls, and deflroying the empire of thefe wicked fpirits, to teach mankind how they might feparate the divine mind from the impure body, and ren- der the former worthy of being united to the Father of fpirits. Their perfuafion, that evil refided in matter, rendered them unfavorable to wedlock ; and led them to hold the do6trine of the refurre(5lion of the body in great contempt. They confidered it as a mere clog to the immortal foul ; and fuppofed, that nothing was meant by it, but either a moral change in the minds of men, which took place before they died ; or that it fignified the afcent of the foul to its proper abode in the fuperior regions, when it was difenga- ^d from its earthly encumbrance. The notion, which this denomination entertained, that the malevolent genii prefi- ded in nature, and that from them proceed all difeafes and calamities, wars and defolations, induced them to apply thcmfelves to the ftudy of magic, to weaken the powers, or fufpcnd the influences of thefe malignant agents. TheGnoftic dov5lrine conccrninc^ the creation of the world by one, or more inferior beings of an evil, or at leaft of an imperfed nature, led them to deny the divine authority of the G N O ^9 the books of the Old Teftament ; and when they were chal- lenged to produce authorities for their do£lrines, fome re- ferred to writings of Abraham, Zoroafter, Chrift, and his apoftles. Others boafted of their having drav/n their opini- ons from fecret do£lrines of Chrift. Others, that they had arrived to thefe degrees of wifdom by an innate vigor of mind. Others, that they were inftru6led by Theudas, a difciple of St. Paul, and by Matthias, one of the friends of our Lord. As the Gnoflics were philofophic and fpeculative people, and affedled refinement, they did not make much account of public worfhip, or ofpofitive inftitutions of any kind. They are faid, not to have had any order in their churches. As many of this denomination thought that Chrift had not any real body, and therefore had not any^ proper flefli and blood, it feems on this account, when they ufed to ce- lebrate the Eucharift, they did not make any ufe of wine, which reprefents the blood of Chrift, but of water only. We have fewer accounts of what they thought or did with refpefl to baptifm, but it feems that fome of them at leaft difufed it. And it is faid, that fome abftained from the Eucharift, and from prayer. The greateft part of this denomination adopted rules of life, which were fullof aufterity, recommending a ftri£l and rigorous abftinence, and prefcribed the moft fevere bodily mortifications, from a notion, that they had a happy influ- ence in purifying and enlarging the mind, and in difpofing it for the contemplation of celeftial things. That fome of the Gnoftics, in confequence of making no account of the body, might think, that there was neither good nor evil in any thing relating to it ; and therefore fuppofe thcmfelves at liberty to indulge in any fenfuai excelTes, is not impofti- i>le 5 though it is more probable, that, every tfeing of this ziature M i f^A o nature woiilJ be greatly exaggerated by the enemies of this denninination."* The Egyptian Gnoftics are diftlnguifhed from the Afia^ tic, by the following difference in their religious fyftem. I. That befides the exigence of a Deity, they main- tained that alfo of an eternal matter, endued with life and motion, yet they did not acknowledge an eternal principle of darknefs, or the evil principle of the Perfians. II. They fuppofed that our blefled Saviour was a com- pound of two perfons, of the man Jefus, and of Chrifl the Son of (jrOD ; that the divine nature entered into the man Jefus, when he was baptized by John in the river Jordan, and departed from him, when he was feized by the Jews. IIL They attributed to Chrift a real, not an imagi- nary body. IV. Their difcipline, with refpe^t to life and manners, was much lefs fevcre than that of the Afiatic feft. Both thefe branches of the Gnoftics were fubdivided intO" various denominations. [See Antitacles, Afcodrutes, Bar- defaniftes, Bafilidians, Bogomiles, Carpocratians, Cerdoni- ans, Cerinthians, Marcofians, Ophites, Saturnians, Simoni- ans, and Valentinians.] Mo^fJ^eirn's EccUfiafiical Hijiory, ^voL 1. p. 6g. 70, IO7, 108, 109- PrifJilefsEccIeftnfiical HiJioryt'voL l. />. 51,183, 185, l35.- Hijiory of Earh Opinions , 'VoL !./>. 120. PercivaVs Dijjertations, GORTONI ANS, a denomination which fprang from the Antinomians, and made great difturbance in New-Eng- land, in the year 164.3. Samuel Gorton was the leader of this denomination. He was charged with maintaining the fentiments of the Antinomians, and Families. Hut cbinjori s Hijiory , njol. \. p, 1 1 7. GREEK-CHURCH. • See Lardner's Works, vol. 9. In which he Ihews, that the opinions of molt ancient fefts have been mifreprefcnted. GREEK-CHURCH. In the eighth century there arofe a difference between the eaftern and weftern churches ; which W4£ carried on with great vehemence during thje ninth century. And in the eleventh century, a total repara- tion took place. At that time the patriarch Michael Ceru- larins, who was defirous to be treed from the Papal autho- rity, publiihed an inve£live againft the Latin-church, and accufed its members of maintaining various errors. Pope Leo IX retorted the charge, and fent legates from Rome to Conftantinople. The Greek patriarch refufed to fee them. Upon which they excommunicated him and his adherents publicly in the church of St. Sophia, A. D. 1054. The Greek patriarch excommunicated thofe legates with all their adherents and followers in a public council ; and procured an order of the emperor for burning the a^: of excommu- nication, which they had pronounced againft the Greeks. This rupture has never been healed, and at this day a very confiderable part of the world profefs the religion of the Greek or Eaflern church. The Nicene and Athanafian creeds are the fymbols of faith in this church. The principal points v/hich didinguifli the Greek-Church from the Latin are as follow. I. They maintain, that the Holy Ghoft proceeds froni the Father only, and not from the Father and Son. II. They difown the authority of the Pope, and deny that the church of Rome is the true catholic church. HI. They do not afFe£t the characler of infallibility. IV. They utterly difallow of works of fupererogationj indulgencies, and difpenfations. V. They admit of prayers and fervices for the dead as an ancient and pious cufioni. And even pray for the remif- fion of theif fins. But will not allow the doclrine of piir- gaiory^ % 92 ^ R E gatory, or determine any thing dogmatically concerning the itate of departed fouls.* VI. Thsy do not baptize their children till they are three, four, five, ten, nay. fometimes eighteen years of age. t VI I . The chnfrn, or haptijmal imB'iony immediately fol- lows the immerfion of baptifni. The pried anoints the perfon baptized in the principal parts of the body, with an ointment, confecrated with many curious circumftances, for that purpofe, by a bifliop. This chrifm is called the unc- tion with ointment ; txtreme un£lion is called the confecra- tion with holy oil. This chrifm is a myflery peculiar to the Greek communion, and holds the place oi confirmation in the Roman. It is ftyled, 1 'he fed of the gift of the Holy Ghcjl, VIII. They infifl: that the facrament of the Lord's fup- per ought to be admlniftered in both kinds. :j: And they give the facrament to children immediately after baptifm. IX They exclude confirmation ^ matrimony ^ and cxtrem^ unciio'-c out of the feven facraments. X. They deny auricular confeffion to be a divine precept, and fay, it is only a pofitive inftitution of the church. Con- feffion and abfolution conflitute this myflery § in the Greek- Church, in which penance docs fiot make a necelfary part. XL * The Greeks, and all the Eaftern nations in general, are of opinion, that departed fouls vvill not be immediately and perfe£ily happy ; and the firii paradife will be a Hate of repofc, and tbq next of eternal felicity. i They perform baptifm, by dipping the perfon three times under water diflindlly, in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghofl. X The napkin v/hich is fpread upon the holy table mufl be con- fecrated by a bifljop, and have fome fmall particles of tfee relics of a martyr mixed in the web, without which the Eucharifl can- not be adminiflercd. ^ The facraments are called myflcries, in the Greek-Churchy G R E 93 XI. Tliey do not pay any religious homage to the Eucharid. XII. They adminiftcr the communion to the laity, both in ficknefs and health. XIII. They do not admit of any Images in biirs-relief, or embofled work ; but ufe painting and fculpnire in filver. XIV. They permit their fecular clergy to marry once, but never twice, unlefs they renounce their funiftion, and become laymen.* XV. They condemn all fourth marriages. The invocation of faints, and tranfubflantiation are alike received by the Greek and Latin churches. They obferve a number of holy days ; and keep four fafts in the year more folemn than the reft, of which the faft: in Lent, before Eafter, is the chief. The fervice of the Greek-Church is too long and com- plicated, to be particularly defcribed in this work. The greateft part confills in pfalms and hymns. Five orders of priefthood belong to the Greek-Church, viz. bifhops, priefts, deacons, fubdeacons, and readers, which laft, includes fingers &c. The epifcopal order is diftinguifhed by the titles of me- tropolitan, archbifhops, and bilhops. The riches of fome of the Greek-Churches, and mona- fteries, in jewels, particularly pearls, in plate, and in the habits of the clergy, are very great, and reckoned not much inferior to thofe in Roman Catholic countries. For an account of the extent of the Greek, or Eaftern Church, See Part II. King's Hiftory of the Greek-Church, />. 1 1, l6, 17, 29, 131, 132. 134. Milloi^s Elements ofHiftoryt C'o/. 2. ^. 206. Father • Their regular, or monaftic clergy arc never allovved to marry. 94 HAT Fi^ther Simon's Rtligion of the Eaftern Nations, p. 5, 6, 7> 8, ^hevenot's Traruels, p. /^iz. Broughtoti's Hiftorical Library y *vol. l.p» 145,146, 147, Hijlory of Religion, No. 6. p. 251, 253. H ATTEMISTS, a Dutch denomination which zrofe in the feventeenth century. The derive their name from Pentium Van Hattem, a mini(ler in the province of Zealand. He interpreted the Calviniftic doflrine concern- ing ahfolute decrees^ fo as to deduce from it the fyftem of a futal and uncontrollable necefflty. Having laid down this prin- ciple to account for the origin of all events, he denied the difference between moral good and evilt and the corruption of human nature. Hence he concluded, that mankind were under no fort of obligation to corre£l their manners, to improve their minds, or to endeavour after a regular obedience to the di- vine laws — That the whole of religion confifted not in a^^ ing but in fuffering — And that all the precepts pfjefus Chrift are reducible to this fmgle one, that we bear with cheerful nefs and patience the events that happen to us through the divine will, and make it our conftant and only ftudy to maintain a permanent tranquillity of mind. This denomination alfo affirmed, that Chrift had not fa^ tisfied the divine juftice, nor made an expiation for the fins of men by his death and fufFerings, but had only fignified to us, by his mediation, that there was nothing in us that could offend the Deity. They maintained that this was Chrift's manner of juftifying his fervants, and prefenting them blaraelefs before the tribunal of God.* They • This opinion was peculiar to the Hattemiils, and dJUinguiihcd ihcm from the Verfchorifts. HER 95 They alfo taught, That God does mf punijh men for their JlnSt but by their fins. Mofieim*! EccUJiaJiical Hijicry, 'vol. 4./). 553, 5^4., HELSAITES, a denomination which arofe in the fecond century. They denied fome parts of the Old and New Tef- tament ; did not own St. Paul to be an apoftIc> ; and thought it an indifferent thing, if in perfecution^ they denied the faith in words. They received a certain book, which they faid came down from heaven, and contained their do(fi:rine. Athtnian Oracle, primarily and antecedently to all other confidera(ions« he ooghg (0 appear infinitely amiable in our eyes? 98 HOP the fear of the wicked, confifts in love. Again, holy grati- tude is nothing but good-will toGoD and our neighbour, in which we ourfelves are inchided, and correfpondent afFedion excited by a view of the good-will and kindnefs of God. Univerfal good-will alfo implies the whole of the duty we owe to our neighbor. For juf^ice, truth, and faithful- ncfs, are comprifed in univerfal benevolence. So are tem- perance and chaftity. For, an undue indulgence of our ap- petite? and paOions is contrary to benevolence, as tending to hurt ourfelves or others ; and fo bppofite to the general good, and the divine comnnand, in which all the crime of fuch indulgence confifts. In (hort, all virtue is nothing but benevolence acted out in its proper nature and perfection, or love toGoD and our neighbour made perfedl in all its genu- ine exercifes and expreflions. II. That ?\\fin confifts m felfijhnefs , By this is meant, an interefted,felfifh affeClion, by which a perfon fits himfelf up as fupreme, and the only object of regard ; and nothing is good or lovely, in his view^, unlefs fuited to promote his own private intereft. This felf-Iove is in its whole nature and every degree of it, enmity againft God. // is not fubjed to the law ofGo'D'^ and is the only affc(?l:ion that can oppofe it. It is the foundation of all fpi- ritual blindnefs ; and therefore the fource of all the op'en idolatry in the heathen world, and falfe religion under the light of the gofpel. All this is agreeable to that felf-love which oppofes God*s true character. Under the influence of this principle, men depart from truth, it being itfelf the greateft practical lie in nature, as it fets up that which is comparatively nothing, above Univerfal Exiftence. Self- love is the fource of all profanenefs and impiety in the •world ; and of all pride and ambition among men, which is nothing but felfifhnefs a6led out in this particular way. This is the foundation of all covetoufnefs and fenfuality ; as it blinds people's eyes, contrads their hearts, and fmks them HOP 99 them down, Co that they look upon earthly enjoymentss as the greateft good. This is the fource of all falfchood, in- juftice, and opprefTion, as it excites mankind by undue me- thods to invade the property of others. — Self-love produces all the violent paffions, envy, wrath, clamor, and evil fpea- king, and every thing contrary to the divine law, is briefly comprehended in this fruitful fource of all iniquity, /^//^-/ij^v. III. That there are no promifes of regenerating grace made to the doings of the unregenerate. For as far as men adl from felf-love, they a£l from a bad end. For thofe who have no true love to God, really do no duty, when they attend on the externals of religion. And as the unregenerate a6l from a felfifh principle, they do no- thing which is commanded. Their impenitent doings are wholly oppofed to repentance and converfion, therefore not implied in the command, To repent, &c. So far from this, they are altogether difobedience to the command.* Hence it appears, that there are no promifes of falvation to the do- ings of the unregenerate. IV. That the impotency of fmners, with refpe£l to bcf lieving in Chrift, is not natural but moral. For • The author of the Moral Difquifitions, while comparing Hop- kinfian-Calvinifls, with real Calvinifls has this inference. It is evident, that Hopkinfian fentiments are only the genuine ftouriftiing and fruitful branches of the Calvinillic tree. For the Hopkinfians plead that there is no duty in the adions of fmners, becaufe they are totally depraved. As total depravity, therefore, is the great pillar in the Calvinillic theory, there is no more dif- ference between Calvinifts and Hopkinfians, than there is be- tween a tree and its branches, or between firft principles and con- feqaences. The broad foundation which fupports our ample fq- perflru6luje,was long fincc deeply and firmly laid in the firft prin- ciples of Calvinifm. To fupport our theory, we need no firft principles, except thofe which Calvinifts have adopted and improved againft Pelagians and Arminians. [See Spring's Mo- ral Difquifitions, p. 40.] joo Ho? i or it is a plain di£late of common fcnfe, that natural impofTibility excludes all blame. But an unwilling mind is univerfally confidered as a crime, and not as an excufe, and is the very thing wherein our wickednefs confifts. That the impotence of the fmner is owing to a difaffedlion of heart, is ev^ident from the promifes of the gofpel. When any obje£l of good is propofed and promifedto us upon afk- ing, it clearly evinces that there can be no irapotency in us with refpe6l to obtaining it, befide the difapprobation of the will ; and that inability which confifts in difinclination, never renders any thing improperly the fubjedl of precept or command. V. That in order to faith in Chrift, a fmner muft ap- prove in his heart of the divine condu6l, even though God fhould caft him off forever ^ which, however, neithpr implies love to mifery, nor hatred ofbapptnejsy^ For, if the law is good, death is due to thofe who have broken it. The Judge of all the earth cannot but do right. It would bring everlafting reproach upon his government to fpare us, confidered merely as in ourfelves. When this is felt * As a particle qf water is fmall in comparifon of a generous ftream, fo the man of humility feels fmall before the great family of his fellow creatures. He values his foul, but when he com- pares it to the great foul of mankind, he almoft forgets and lofes jfjght of it : for the governing principle of his heart is to eftimate things according to their worth. When, therefore, he indulges a humble comparifon with his Maker, he feels loft in the infinite fulnefs and brightness of divine love, as a ray of light is loft in the fun, and a particle of water in the ocean. It infpires him with the moft grateful feelings of heart, that he has opportunity to be in the hand of God, as clay in the hand of the potter : and as he confiders himfelf in this humble light, he fubmits the nature and fize of his future veflel entirely to God. As his pride 5s loft in the duft, he looks up with pleafure towards the throne of God, and rejoicc5 with all his heart in the reiflitude of the diving |dminiftration. HOP lor fe\i in our lieartg, and not till then, we fli^ll be prepared to look to the free grace of God through the redemption which is in Chrift, and to ex.ercife faith in his blood, who is Jet forth to be a propitiation to declare God'j righteoufnejs, that he might be jujiy and yet be the jujtijier of him who beliveth in Jefus. VI. That the infinitely wife and holy God has exerted his omnipotent power in fuch a manner, as he purpofed fhould be followed with the exiftence and entrance of moral fvil in the fyftem. For it muft be admitted on all hands, that God has a perfe£l knowledge, forefight, and view of all pofTible exif- tences and events. If that fyftem and fcene of operation, in which moral evil fhould never have exiftence, was a61;u- ^\\y preferred in the divine mind, certainly the Deity is in- finitely difappointed in the iflue of his own operations. No- thing can be more difhonorable to God, than to im.agine that the fyftem, which is adlually formed by the divine hand, and which was made for his pleafure and glory, is yet, not the fruit of wife contrivance and defign. VII. That the introdudion of y?^, is, upon the whole, for the general good. For the wifdom and power of the Deity are difplayed in carrying on defigns of the greateft good : and the exiftence of moral evil has undoubtedly occafioncd a more full, per- fect, and glorious difcovery of the infinite perfe<51:ions of the divine nature, than could otherwife have been made to the view of creatures. If the extenfive manifeftations of the pure and holy nature of God, and his infinite averfi- on to fm, and all his inherent perfcdions, in their genuine fruits and efFe6ls, is either itfelf the greateft good, or necef- farily contains it ; it muft neceflarily follow, that the intro- 4u£lion oijin is for the greatefi good. YIIL That repentance is befgjre faith in Chrift. By 102 HOP By this is not intended, that repentance is before a fpecu- latlve belief of the being and perfeBiom of God, and of the -perjon and charader of Chrift ; but only, that true repent- ance is previous to a faving faith in Chrift, in which the be- liever is united to Chrift, and entitled to the benefits of his mediation and atonement. That repentance is before faith in this fenfe, appears from feveral confiderations. \Ji. As repentance and faith refpec^ different objedls, fo they are diftin(5l exercifes of the heart, and therefore one not only may, but muft be prior to the other. id. There may be genuine repentance of fm without faith in Chrift ; but there cannot be true faith in Chrift without repentance of fin : and fince repentance is necefTary in order to faith in Chrift, it muft necefTarily be prior to faith in Chrift. 3 12, 19, 26, 27, 28, 29, 34, 171, lg7, 202. Edwards en the IVill, p. 234, 289. ■ Nature of True Virtue* Bellamy'* s True Religion Delineated, p. 1 5, * '-Dialogues het^jceen Theron and Paulinus, ^185, Weji's Ej/ajs on Moral Agency y p. IJQ, 177, 18 I, * Spring's Nature cf Duty, p. 23. Moral DiJquijfitionSi p. 40. Manufcri^t by ike Rev. Mr, Efhmoris, HUSSI TES, a denomination in Bohemia ; fo called from John Hufs, one of their principal teachers, who, about the year 141 4, embraced and defended the opinions ofWickliff. [See Wickliffites.] Brandt'' s Hijlory of the Refofm^ ^voL 2. p. iS, HUTCHINSONI ANS. So called from the late John HutchinfonKfq.who was born 1674. This laborious writer was a layman of Yorkfliire, and being of a fludious turn, alTifted by a proper education, he made many valuable dif- coveries in the philofophy of nature, which he afterwards applied to theological difquifitions, and had the pleafure to find an exadl conformity between thefe two great conftituents of human knowledge. It appears to be a leading fentiment of this denomination, that all our ideas of divinity are formed from the ideas in nature. That nature is a flandard picfture, and fcripturc an application of the feveral parts of that pi6lure,to draw out to, as the great things of God, in order to reform our mental conceptions.* To ♦This Is the point, which Mr. Henry Lee endeavours to prove in his Sophron, or Nature's Charadleriftics of the Truth, In ^ coorfe of meditations on the fccaes of nature, he Ihews their analogy to what, he fuppofcs, arc fcriptural truths. il U T 105 To prove this point, the Hutchlnfonians allege, that tlic fcriptures declare. The invifible things of God j from the for-' mation of the world, are clearly feen, being undcrflood by the. things which are made, even his eternal power and Godhead. Rom. i. 20. The heavens miifi declare God'j righteoufnefs and truth in the congregation of the faints. Pfalm Ixxxix. 5. And in fhort, the whole fyftem of nature, in one voice of analogy, declares and gives us ideas of his glory, and (hews us his handy w^ork. We cannot have any ideas of invifible things, till they are pointed out to us by revelation. And as w^e cannot know them immediately, fuch as they are in themfelves, after the manner in which we know fenfible objecfls, they muft be communicated to us by the mediation of fuch things as we already comprehend. For this reafon the fcripture is found to have a language of its own, which does not confift of words, but of figns or figures taken from vifible things. la confequence of which the world, which we now fee, be- comes a fort of commentary on the mind of God, and ex- plains the world in which we believe. The doflrines of the chriftian faith are attefted by the whole natural world. They are recorded in a language, which has never been confounded \ they are written in a text, which fhall never be corrupted. The Hutchinfonians maintain, that the great myflery of the Trinity is conveyed to our underflandings by ideas of fenfe. And that the created fubftance of the air or heaven, in its threefold agency of fire, light, and fpirit, is the enig- ma of the one elTence, or one Jehovah in three pcrfons. The Unity of effence is exhibited by its Unity of fubdance. The Trinity of perfons, by its Trinity of conditions, fire, light, and fpirit. Thus the one fubftance of the air or hea- ven, in its three conditions, fhev/s the Unity in Trinity ; and its three conditions, in or of one fubftance> theTrinity in Unity, O For, jo6 n V r For, fay this denomination, if we confultthe writings of the Old and New Teflament, we fhall find the perfons of the Deity, reprefented under the names and chara£lers of the three material agents, fire, light, and fpirit ; and their a£ltons expreiTed by the actions of thefe their emblems. The Father is called a confuming fire, and his judicial proceedings are fpoken of in words, which denote the feve- ral anions of fire. See Deut. iv. 24. Jehovah Is a confu' mingfire. Heb. xii. 2(^. OiirQiO'D is a conjumingfiret &c. The Son has the name of light, and his purifying adions and offices are defcribed by words, which denote the a£lions and offices of light. He is the true light t which Ughteth every rfian that cometh into the world, John i. g. See alfo Mai. iv. a. and a variety of other pafTages. The Comforter has the name of fpirit, and his anima-* ting and fuftaining offices are defcribed by words for the alliens and offices of the material fpirit. His adions, in -the fpiritual economy, are agreeable to his type, in the na- tural economy, fuch as infpiring, impelling, driving, lead- ing. [See Matt. iv. i. &c.] The philofophic fyflem of the Hutchinfunians is derived from the Hebrew fcriptures. The truth of it refls on thefe fuppofitions. I, That the Hebrew language was formed under divine infpiration, either all at once, or at different times, as oc- cafions required. And that the Divine Being had a view, in conftru(!?fing it, to the various revelations, which he, in all fucceeding times, fhould make in that language. Con- fequently, that its words muR be the moft proper and de- terminate to convey fuch truths, as the Deity, during the Old Tefiament difpenfation, thought fit to make known to the fons of men. Farther than this, that the infpircd pen- men of thofe ages, at lead, were under the guidance of hea- ven in the choice of words for recording what was revealed to them. Therefore, that the Old Teltament, if the lan- guage H U 107 guage is rightly underflood, is the moR dclerminatc, in its meaning, of any othtir book under heaven. II: That whatever is recorded in the Old Tcftament is flridlly and literally true, allowing only for a few commoij figures of rhetoric. I'hat nothing contrary 10 truth, is ac- comodated to vulgar apprehenfions.* In proof of this the Hutchinfonians argue in this manner. The primary and ultimate defign of revelation is, indeed, -to teach men divinity ; but in fubferviency to that, geo- graphy, hiftory, and chronology areoccafionally introduced ; all which are allowed to be juft and authentic. There are ^Ifo innumerable references to things of nature, and de- fcriptions of them. If then the former are juft, and to be depended on, for the fame reafon the latter ought to be ef- teemed philofophically true. Further, they think it not iinworthy of God, that he fhould make it a fecondary end of his revelation, to unfold the fecrets of his works ; as the primary was to make known the myfteries of his nature, and defigns of his grace ; that men might thereby be led to admire and adore the wifdom and goodnefs, which the great Author of the univerfe has difplayed throughout all his works. And as our minds are often referred to natural things for ideas of fpiritual truths, it is of great importance, in order to conceive aright of divine matters, that our ideas of the natural things referred to, be ftri£l:ly juft and true. Mr. Hutchinfon found, that the Hebrew fcriptures had fome capital words, which he thought ha4 not been iduly * Mr. Hutchinfon raaititained, t'hat the Hebrew fcriptures no where afcribe motion to the body of the fun, nor fij^edneCs to the earth. That they defcribe the created fyftcm to be a plenum with- out any vacuum at all ; and rejefl the afTiftance of gravitation, attradion, or any fuch occuh qualities for performing the fiated operations of nature, which are carried on by the mechanifm of the heavens in their threefold condition of fire, light, and /pirit, the material agpnts fet to work in the beginning. io8 J A C confidercd and underftood, and which he has endeavoured to prove contain, in their radical meaning, the greatelt and moll comfortable truths. The cherub'wu he explains to be an hieroglyphic of divine conftruflion, or a facred image to dcfcribe, as far as figures could go, the humanity united to Deity. And fo he treats of fcveral other words of fimilar import. From all which he concluded, That the rites and and ceremonies of the Jewifli difpenfation were fo many delineations of Chrift, in what lie was to he, to do, and to luffer, that the early Jews knew them to be types of his actions and fufFerings, and by performing theni as fuch^ were fo farChriftians both in faith and praflice. Hut chin fan's Works, . 121, I28. Chriflian Magazine t 4^^^^^>#W ther the explication of the one by the other. And in order to fucceed in the enterprife, affirmed that Chrifl; had left the doctrine of falvaiion imperfedl and unfinifhed ; and that he was the comforter whom the departing Saviour had pro- mifed to his difciples to lead them into all truth — The principles of Manes are comprehended in the following furamary. That there are two principles, from which all things pro- ceed. The one, a mo^ pure andjuhtle matter y called Light / and the other a grofs and corrupt juhfianccy called Darknefs^ Each of thefe are fubje«5l to the dominion of a fuperintend- ing Beingy whofe exiftence is from all eternity. The Be-^ ing who prefides over the Lights is called God \ he that rules the land of Darkvefs, bears the title of Hyk, or Demon, The Ruler of the Light is fupremely happy, and in confe- quence thereof benevolent and good. The Prince of Dark- nefs is unhappy in himfelf, and defiring to render others partakers of his mifery, is evil and malignant. Thefe two beings have produced an immenfe multitude of creatures, refcmbling themfelves, and diftributed them through their rcfpedlive provinces. The Prince of Darknefs knew not for a long ferics of ages, that Light exided in the univerfe , and no fooner per- ceived it by means of a war kindled in his dominions, than he bent his endeavours towards the fubjcdting of it to his em- pire. M AN 125 pire. lie Ruler of ike Light oppofed to his efforts an ar- my, commanded by thcfrji mariy but not with the higheft fuccefs ; for the Generals of the Prificc of Darknefs, fcized upon a confiderable portion of the celcftial elements, and of the light itfelf, and mingled iheni in the mafs of corrupt matter. The fecond General of the Ruler of the Lights whofe name was the Living Spirit^ made war with more fuccefs againfl: the Prince oi Darknefs, but could not en- tirely difengage the pure particles of the celeftial matter, from the corrupt rnafs through which they had been difper- /ed. The Prince of Darknefs, after his defeat, produced the firft parents of the human race. The beings engendered from this original ftock, confiil of a body formed out of the corrupt matter of the kingdom of Darknefs, and of two fouls, one of which hfenfitive and lufful, and owes its ex- iftence to the evil principle ; the other rational znA immortal ^ a particle of that divine Light which was carried away by the army of Darknefs^ and immerfed into the mafs of ma- lignant matter. Mankind being thus formed by the Prince of Darknefs, and thofe minds that were the produ(51:ions of the eternal Light, being united to their mortal bodies, God created the earth out of the corrupt mafs of matter, by that livifig Spirit who had vanquifhed the Prince of Darknefs. The defign of this creation was to furnifh a dwelling for the hu- man race ; to deliver by degrees the captive fouls from their corporeal prifons ; and to extraft the celeftial elements from the grofs fubftance in which they were involved. In order to carry this defign into execution, God produced two Beings of eminent dignity from his own fubftance, which were to lend their aufpicious fuccours to imprifoned fouls. One of thefe fublime entities was Chrift, and the other the Holy Ghoft. Chrift is that glorious intelligence which the Perfians called Mythras ; he is a moft fplendid fubftance, confifting of the brightnefs of the eternal Light ; fubfifting in and by himfelf j endowed with life \ enriched with 126 MAN with infinite wifdom ; and his refidence is in the fun. The Holy Ghoft is alfo a luminous animated body, difFufed through every part of the atmofphere, which furrounds this terreftrial globe. This genial prindpal warms and illumi- nates the minds of men, renders alfo the earth fruitful, and draws forth gradually from its bofom,the latent particles oC celeflial fire, v/hich it wafts up on high to their primi- tive ftation. After that the Supreme Being had, for a long time, ad- monifhed and exhorted the captive fouls, by the miniftry of the angels and holy men raifed up and appointed for that purpofe, he ordered Chrift to leave the folar regions, and to defccnd upon earth, in order to accelerate the return of fhofe imprifoned fpirits to their celeftial country. In obe- dience to this divine command, Ghrift appeared among the Jews, clothed with the fhadowy form of a human body, and Kot with the real fubftance. During his miniftry, he taught mortals how to difengage the rational fouls from the cor- rupt body, to conquer the violence of malignant matter ; and he demonftrated his divine miflion by ftupendous mira- cles. On the other hand, the Prince of Darknefs ufed every method to inflame the Jews againft this divine meflenger, and incited them at length to put him to death upon an ig-- nominious crofs ; which punifhment, however, he fuffered not in leality, but only in appearance, and in the opinion of men. When Chrift had fulfilled the purpofes of hiq miflion, he returned to his throne in the fun, and appointed a certain number of chofen apoftles to propagate througl^ the world, the religion he had taught during the courfe of his miniftry. But before his departure, he promifed, that at a certain period iji time, he would fend an apoftle fuperior to all others in eminence and dignity, whom he called the Para- clete, or Comforter^ who fhould add many things to the pre-^ .cepts he had delivered, and difpel all the errors under which his fervants laboured with refpc(5l to divine things. This MAN 12.7 Comforter, thus exprefsly promlfed by Chrlft', is Manes the Perfian, who, by the order of the Moft High, declared to mortals the whole do61:rine of falvation without exception, and without concealing any of its truths under the veil of metaphor, or any other covering. Thofe fouls who believe Jefus Chrift to be the Son of God, renounce the worfliip of the God of the Jews, who is the Prince oi Darknefs , obey the laws delivered by Chrifl:, as they are enlarged and illuftrated by the Cwifortery Manes, and combat with perfevcring fortitude, the lufts and appe- tites of a corrupt nature, derive from this faith and obedi- ence the ineftimable advantage of being gradually purifie(i from the contagion of matter. The total purification of fouls cannot indeed be accompliflied during this mortal life. Hence it is, that the fouls of men, after death, muft pafs^ through two ftates more of probation and trial, hy water Sindjire, before they can afcend to the regions of Light. They mount therefore firft into the moon, which confifts of benign and falutary water ; whence, after a luftration of fifteen days, they proceed to the fun, whofe purifying Jire removes entirely all their corruption, and effaces all their ftains. The bodies, compofed of malignant matter, which they have left behind them, return to their fird ftate, and enter into their original mafs. On the other hand, thofe fouls who have negle£led the falutary work of their purification, pafs, after death, into the bodies of animals or other natures, where they remain until they have expiated their guilt and accomplifhed their falvation. Some, on account of their peculiar obftinacy and per- vcrfenefs, pafs through a feverer courfe of trial, being deliv- ered over, for a certain time, to the pov/er of malignant ae- rial fpirits, who torment them in various ways. When the greateft part of the captive fouls are reflored to liberty, and to the regions of light, then a devouring fire fhall break forth. I2S MAN forth, at the divine command, from the caverns in which it is at prefent confined, and fhall deftroy the frame of the world. After this tremendous event, the Prince and Pgw- \trs ot Darhiejs ihall be forced to return to their primitive feats of anguifh and mifery, in which they fhall dwell for- ever. For to prevent their ever renewing this war in the regions oi Light, God fhall furround the manfions of Dark- fiefs with an invincible guard, compofed of thofe fouls who have not finifhed their purifications, who fet in array like a military band, fhall furround thofe gloomy feats of wo,and hinder any of their wretched inhabitants from coming forth again to the Light^^ To fupport their fundamental do£lrinc of two principles, the Manicheans argue in this manner. If we depend only on one almighty caufe, infinitely good and infinitely free ^ who difpofes univerfally of all beings, according to the pleafure of his will, we cannot account for the exiftence of natural and moral evil. If the author of our being is fupremely good, he will take continual pleafure in promoting the hap- pinefsofhis creatures, and preventing every thing which can diminifh or difturb their felicity. We cannot therefore explain the evils which we experience but by the hypothefis of two principles ; for it is impoffible to conceive that the firfl man could derive the faculty of doing ill from a good principle ; fince this faculty, and every thing which can produce evil is vicious, for evil cannot proceed but from a bad caufe. Therefore the free-will of Adam was derived from two oppofite principles. He depended upon the good principle for his power to perfevere in innocence ; but his power to deviate from virtue owed its rife to an evil princi'- pie, • The punifhments, which God inflifls on human fouls, are corredive, and will produce reformation fooner or later. Yet thofe who are found in a flate of impcrfedlion at the laft day, muft be doomed to this fituation, which, they confider rather as a depravation of fupcrior happinefs and glory, than as aftual laifery. MAN t29 pie. Hence it is evident there arc two contrary principles ; the one the fource of good, the other the fountain of all mi- fery and vice.* Manes commanded his followers to mortify and macerate the body, which he looked upon as cJJ'entially corrupt ; to de- prive it of all thofe objects which could contribute either to its convenience or delight ; to extirpate all thofe defircs which lead to the purfuit of external obje6ts ; and to dived themfelves of all the paffions and inftinds of nature. But he did not impofe this fevere manner of living, without diftin£lion, upon his adherents. He divided his difciples into two clafTes ; one of which comprehended the perfedl Chriftians,under the name of the Eled ; the other, the im- perfe£l and feeble, under the title of Hearers. The EIe(^ were obliged to an entire abftinence from flefh, eggs, milk, fi(h,wine, all intoxicating drink, wedlock, and all amorous gratifications ; and to live in a ftate of the fliarpeft penury, nourifhing their emaciated bodies with bread, herbs, pulfe, and melons. The difcipline appointed for the Hearers was of a milder nature. They were allowed to poffefs houfes, lands, and wealth, to feed upon flefh, and to enter into the bonds of conjugal tendernefs. But this liberty v.as granted them with many limitations, and under the ftri£lell condi- tions of moderation and temperance. The General Aflembly of the Manicheans was headed by a Prefident, who reprefented Jcfus Chrill:. There were joined to him twelve rulers, or majlersy who were defigned to reprefent the twelve apojlles ; and thefe were followed by feventy-two bi/hopSy the images of One feventy-two difciples of Qur Lord. Thefe bifhops had prejbyters and deacons under R them ; • To remove the ftrongeft obftacles to this fyftem. Manes re- je£led the Old Teftament, the four Gofpels, and the Ads of the apoflles, and faid that the Epiftles of St. Paul were falfified in a variety of places. He wrote a gafpel which he pretended wss dilated to him by God himfelfj and difiinguifhed it by the nam© 0/ Erteng, 130 ^I A R them ; and all the members of thefe religious orders were chofcn out of the clafs of theElefl. The Manicheans obferved the Lord's day, but fafted upon it. They likevvife celebrated Eafter ; and had a re- gular church difcipiine and cenfures. They read the fcrip- tures — they baptized even infants in the name of the Fa- ther,Son,and Holy Ghoft, and partook of the Lord's fupper. The doiftriwe of Manes differs from the Gnoftics in this refpe£l. Inftead of fuppofing evil to have originated ulti- mately from inferior and fubordinate beings, he held the dodrine of two original independent principles ; the one immaterial and fupremely good, the other material and the fource of all evil, but afluated by a foul, or fomething of the nature of intelligence. Mojheim^s Ecdejiajitcal Hijioryt 'voL i. /, 239, 245* Bayle*s Hijiorical Di^ionary, 'vol. 4. /. 2487,2489* Priejiley's Ecchftajiical Hiftory, W. I./. 518. J or tin's Remarks y njoL 2. p. 263. MARCEL LI ANS, a denomination in the fourth centu- ry ; fo called from Marcellus, who held the fentiments of the Sabellians. [See Sabellians.] Bay ley *i Dictionary* [ See Marcellani/m. ] MARCIONITES, a denomination in the fecond cen- tury ; fo called from Marcion, fucceflbr of Cerdo, who made feveral additions to his do(5lrines. He taught men to believe in another God, fupcrlor to^ the Creator, wlio was the fupreme God, the Father, invi- fible, inacceffible, and perfe6lly good. The Creator, the God of the Jews, made this lower and vifible world. The fupreme God, the Father, had alfo a world of his making ; but better than this, immaterial and invifible. For he fup- pofcd, if a good God had made this world, there would have been neither fin, nor mifery 5 but all men would have been holy M A R 1-3^ holy and haf>py. lie taught, that Jcfus was the Son of the goodGoD,who took the exterior form of a man, and without being born, or gradually growing up, to the full flature of a man, he ihewed himfelf at once in Galilee, as a man grown. He alfo fuppofcd, that, at the firfl moment of his appear- ance in tke world, he was completely fitted to enter on his great work ; and, that he immediately aflTumcd the charac- ter of a Saviour. According to the cio. 48, MARONITES, certain Eaftern Chriftians, who inha- bit near Mount Libanus, in Syria. The name is derived either from a town in the country called Maronia, or from St. Maron,who built a monaftery theye in the fifth century. This denomination retained the opinions of the Mono- thelites until the twelfth century, when abandoning and re- nouncing the doclrine of one will in Chrift, they were re- admitted in the year 11 82, to the communion of the Ro- ir.an-Church. As to the particular tenets of the Maronites, before their reconciliation to the church of Rome, they obferved fatur- «iay as well as the fabbath. They held, that all fouls were created tegether ; and that thofe of good men do not enter into heaven, till alter the refurre£tion. They added other opinions, which were fimilar to thofe of the Greek-Church- r^ee Greek-Church.] Broughfon''s H.Ji or ical Library » n3ol. 2. /. 5 1. ^ Sim's EccUfiaJlical Hijioryy tabiiflied laws of nature, no event could have been other- wife than it has been, isy or is to he^ and therefore, all things pad, prefent, and to come, are precifely what the Author of nature really intended them to be, and has made provi- fion for. To eftablifh this conclufion, nothing is necefTary, but that, throughout all nature, the fame confequences (hould invariably refult from the fame circumftances. For if this is admitted, it will neceffarily follow, that at the commence- ment of any fyftem, fmce the feveral parts of it and their refpedlivc lituations were appointed by the Deity, the firil change would take place according to a certain rule^ eftab- lifhed by himfelf, the refult of which would be a ncwfttu- ation ; after which, the fame laws continuing, another change would fucceed, according to the fame rules, and fo on forever \ every new fituation invariably leading to ano- ther, and every event, from the commencement to the ter- minaiion of the fyftem, being ftriftly conne«5^ed ; fo that, unlefs the fundamental laws of the fyftem were changed, it would be inn.pofliblc that any event fhould have been other- wife than it was. In all thefe cafes, the circumftances preceding any change, are called the caiijes of that change \ and fmce a determi- nate nation, and the fame views of things prefented to us, we might be even voluntarily difpofed to choofe either of two different things at the fame moment of time, is juft as impoffible, as that an involuntary or mechanical motion fhould depend upon no cer- tain laws or rule, or that any other efFed, fhould exift without an adequate caufe. If the mind is as conftantly determined by the influence of motives, as a ftone is determined to fall to the ground by the influence of gravity, we are conflrained to con- clude, that the caufe in the one a^s as neceffarily ,as in the oihcr^ M 137 nate event, or cffeS conftantly follows certain circumflan- ces, or caufeSf the connexion between caufe and cffe^ is con- cluded to be invariahlc aad therefore necejfary. It is univerfally acknowledged, that there can be no ef- fect without an adequate cauje. This is even the founda- tion on which the only proper argument for the being of a God reils. And the NecefTarian aiTerts, that if, in any given ftate of mind, with refpe£l both to difpoptlons and motives^ two different determinations, or volitions be pofTible, it can be on no other principle, than that one of them fhould come under the defcription of an effe^ without a caujcy juft as if the beam of a balance might incline either way, though loaded with equal weights. And if any thing whatever, even a thought in the mind of man, could arife without an adequate caufe, any thing elfe, the mind itfelf, or the whole univerfe, might likewife exift without an adequate caufe. This fcheme of philofophical necefjityy implies a chain of caufes and effeSls^ eftabliflied by infinite wifdom, and termi- nating in the greatefl: good of the whole univerfe. Evils of all kinds, natural and moral, being admitted, as far as they contribute to that end, or are in the nature of things infe- parable from it.* Vice is produdive, not of good, but of evil to us, both here and hereafter ; though good may refult from it to the whole fyftem. And according to the fixed laws of.aature, our prefent and future happinefs neccjfarily depend on our cultivating good difpofitions.^ S Our * Dr, Priejiley fays, the doftrine of necejjtty contains all that the heart of man can wi(h. It leads us to confider ourfelves, and every thing elfe, as at the uncontrolled difpofal of the greateft and beft of Beings ; that, ftridlly fpeaking, nothing does, or can go wrong ; and that all retrogade motions in the moral, as well as in the natural world, are only apparent, not real. f By oar being liable to puniftiment for our a^lions and ac- countable for ihem, is meatxt, that it is wife and good in the Su- preme t3$ M A T Our learned Author diftlnguifhes this khcmc of phi lofj^ phical ncccjjhy from the Calviniftic do6lrine oi pndejiination, in the following particulars. I. No NeceJJ'anan fuppofes that any of the human race will fufFer eternally ; but that future punifliments will an- fwer the fame purpofe as temporal ones are found to do, all of which tend to good, and are evidently admitted for that purpofe. Upon the do£lrlne of neccjjify alfo, the mofl Indifferent actions of men are equally neceifary with the moft impor- tant ; fmce every volition, like any other effeSf, muft have an adequate caujct depending upon the previous ftate of the mind, and the influence to which it is expofcd. II. The Necejfarian believes that his own difpofitions and adions are the neceffary and fole means of his prefent and future happinefs ; fo that, in the moft proper fenfc ©f the words, it depends entirely upon himfelf, whether he be virtuous or vicious, happy or miferable. III. The Calviniftic fyftem entirely excludes the po- pular notion oifree-ivHh viz. the liberty or power of doing what we pleafe, virtuous, or vicious, as belonging to every perfon in every fituation ; which is perfe^flly confident with the do£lrine of phihjophical mcejjity, and indeed refults from it. IV. The AVf^r/V« believes nothing of the pofterity of Adam's finning in him, and of their being liable to the wrath of God on that account, or the neceflity of an infi- nite Being making atonement for them by fuffering in their ftcad, and thus making the Deity propitious to them. He believes nothing of all the adlions of any man being fiecef-^ farily fmful \ but, on the contrary, thinks that the very worft preme Being to appoint, that certain fufFerings Ihould follow cer- tain anions, provided they be 'voluntary, though neceifary ones, A courfe of ^voluntary adliona and fuiTerings being calculated tq promote ihc greateft ultimate good. M E I 139 ^orft of men are capable of benevolent intentions in many things that they do ; and likewife, that very good men arc capable of falling from virtue, and confcquently, of linking into final perdition. Upon the principles of the NeceJJa- rian, alfo, all late repentance, and efpecially after long and confirmed habits of vice, is altogether and nccellarilv inef- fedual ; there not being fufficient time left to produce a change of difpofition and character, which can only be done hy a change of condudl of proportionably long continuance. In fhort, the three do6trines of Alateriali/m, Philojophical NeceJJity, and Socitiianifniy arc confidered as equally parts of one fyttem. The fcheme of necejfity is the immediate refult of the 7naterialtty of man ; for viechanijm is the undoubted confequcuce of matcriaViJm. And that man is wholly ma- terialf is eminently fubfervient to the proper, or mere human- iiy of Chrift. For if no man has a foul dift:in6l from his body, Chrift, who in all other refpeds, appeared as a man, could not have a foul which had exifted before his body. And the whole do<5lrine of the pre-exiflence of fouls, of which the opinion of the pre-exijience of Chrift is a branch, will be efFe<5lually overturned. [See Unitarians.] Priejiley^s Di/qutjitions, on Matter and Spirit, 'vol. i. p. 4» 5> 56, 69, 102, 163. » ■ Fol. 2, On Philofophical NeceJJlty,p. 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18,20,27, 108, 184, 1 85, 1 8 8, 190, 191, 193. Hijiory of Early Opinions, ^voL \. p. 211, 212. Correfpondence bet^ween Friefiley and Price, p. 118, 359. MELCHITES, the Syrian, Egyptian, and other Eaftern Chriftians in the Levant ; who, though they are not Greeks, follow the dodrines of the Greek-Church, except in fome few points which relate only to ceremonies and ecclefiaftical difcipline. They were called Melchites, i. e. Royalifts, by their adverfaries by way of reproach, on account of their implicit fubmiftion to the edicft of the Emperor Marcion, in favor of the council of Chalcedon. Mo/heim's Ecckfiajiical Hiftory, 'vol. 2. p. 3 I. (jollier's Hijiorical Diaionary, W, 2. [See Melchites.] MELECIANS, S4« M E X MELECIANS, a denomination in the fourth century, fo called from their leader Melecias, Bilhop of Lycopuli^ in Egypt. This prelate declared with great zeal againft thofe Chrif- tianSf who, having apoftatized, defired to be reconciled to the church ; and would not have thofc admitted to re- pentance w^ho fell mioftUt though their contrition was ever io great. The Melecians faftened little bells to the bottom of their garments, and fung their prayers, dancing all the time ; and this they thought a fure means to appeafc the wrath of God, Broughtcn's HiJloricaL Library y 'voL 2, p, 547. Chevreaui Hijlory^ . MELATONI. So called from one Mileto ; who 4aught, that not the foul, but the body of man, was made after God's image. JRofs^s Vienjj of all Religions, p, 31 1. MENANDERIANS, a denomination in the firft cen- tury, from Menander, a difciple of Simon Magus, He pretended to be one of the JEons fent from the PJero- via, or celcftial regions, to fuccour the fouls that lay groan- ing under bodily opprefuon and fervitude, and to maintain md flratac^ems of the demons that hold M E K 141 hold the reins of empire in this fublunary world. He bap- tized his difciples in his own name ; and promifcd them after this baptifm, a morccafy vidlory over the evil fpirits ; and that, after this life, they Ihould become partakers of the rcfurre(flion of the dead, and of immortality. MopHiins EcclefiaJUcal Hi/iory, 'vol. \. p. 116. Fcrmeys Ecchfiajiical Hijiory y ^vcl. l. p. 21. MENNONITES,a fociety o'i Baptijls, in Holland ; fo called from Mennon Simonis, of Frielland, v.'ho lived in the fixteenth century. It is a univerfal maxim of this denomination, that prac- tical piety is the effence of religion, and that the fiireft mark of the true church is the fandlity of its members. They all unite in pleading for toleration in religion ; and debar none from their afTemblies, who lead pious lives, and own the fcriptures for the word of God. They teach, that in- fants are not the proper fubjefts of baptifm, and that min- ifters of the gofpel ought to receive no falary, and that it is not lawful to fwear or wage war upon any occafion. They alfo maintain, that the terms, Perfon and Trinity, are not to be ufed in fpeaking of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft. The Mennonites meet privately, and every one in theaf- fembly has the liberty to fpeak, to expound the fcriptures, to pray and fing. They affemble twice every year from all parts of Holland, at Rynfbourg, a village about two leagues from Leyden, at which time they receive the communion, fitting at a table, where the firft diftributes to the reft. All denominations are admitted, even the Roman Catholics^ if they pleafe to come. The ancient Mennonites profefTed a contempt of erudi- tion [and fcience : and excluded all from their communion, who deviated in the lead, from the moft rigorous rules of fmiplicity and gravity in their looks, their gellures, their plothing, or their table. But this primitive aufterity is greatly diminifhec} in the mcft confiderable denominations of 142 MEN of the Mennonites. Thofe who adhere to their ancient dif- cipline are called Flemings, or Flandrians. The Mennonites in Pennfylvania do not baptize by inu meifion, though they adminifter the ordinance to none but adult perfofis. Their common method is this — The perfon to be baptized, kneels ; the minifter holds his hands over him, into which the deacon pours water, and through which it runs on the crown of the kneeling perfon's head ; after which follow impofition of hands and prayer, Mojheim's Ecclejtajiical Hftoryy voL ^. p. 151, 155, i6a. Dit'tionary cf Arts and Sciences, 'vol. 3. p. 2037. Edxvards Hijiory of the jimcrican Baptijls^ 'vol. I. ^. 94. MEN OF UNDERSTANDING. This title diftin- guifhed a denomination which appeared in Flanders and l^ruiTcls in the year 151 1. They owed their origin to an illiterate man, whofe name was Egidius Cantor, and to William of Hildenifon, a Carmelite monk. They pre- tended to be honored with celeftial vifions, denied that any could arrive at perfeft knowledge of the holy fcriptures, without the extraordinary fuccours of a divine illumina- tion ; and declared the approach of a new revelation from heaven, more perfect than the gofpel of Chrift. They faid that the refurre(flion was accompliflied in the perfon of Je- fus, and no other was to be expected. — That the inward man was not defiled by the outward actions, whatever they were. — That the pains oi hell were to have an end, and not only- all mankind, but even the devils themfelves, were to returH to God, and be made partakers of eternal felicity. They alfo taught among other things, I. That Chrift alone had merited eternal life and feli- city for the human race, and that therefore men could not acquire this ineftimable privilege by their own a£lions alone. II. That the priefts to whom the people confefTed their tranfgreflions, had not the power of abfolving them, but this authority was vefted in Chrift alone, jii. M H3 III. That voluntary penance and mortification was not neceflary to falvation. This denomination appear to have been a branch of the Brethren and Sifters of the Free Spirit. Mojhiim's Ecclejlajiical Hijlory^ 'vol. 3. p. 276, METHODI STS. This name firft diftinguifhed a num. ber of ftudents in Oxford College ; who, in the year 1729, joined in a religious fociety, and agreed upon certain me- thods or rules for fpending their time in farting, praying, communicating, vifiting the fick and the prifoners, inftruft- ing the ignorant, &c. and hence they were called Method- ifts. The Rev. MefTieurs John and Charles Wefley were the leaders of this fociety. This was the firft rife of Methodifm ; the fecond was at Savannah, in April 1736, when twenty or thirty perfons met at the houfe of the Rev Mr. Wefley ; the laft was in London ; forty or fifty agreed to meet every Wednefday evening, in order to a free converfe begun and ended with prayer. This fociety kept increafing, till they amounted to a very large number. After the minifters of this fociety were forbid the ufe of the churches, when the houfes could not contain the peo- ple, they preached in the open air. This denomination was divided into two clafles. The Rev. George Whitefield, a celebrated iiinerant preacher, who had joined Mr. Wefley 's fociety, became th& leader of the Calviniftic Methodifts. He was a pro- fefled member of the Church of England, and nraintained the Calviniftic doflrines, as explained in the articles of that church. In all his public difcourfes, he infifted largely on the necefllity of regeneration. He maintained, that the form of ecclefiaftical worfliip and prayer, whether taken from the Book of Common Prajer, or poured forth extempore, was 144 M E T a matter of indifFerence. And accordingly made ufe of both forms. The other party of Methodifts embrace the opinions of Rev. Mr. John Wefley ; who warmly oppofed the Calvin- iftic do£lrines oi eleSfion 2ind final p erf everance ; but admit- ted the corruption of human nature, and juftification by faith alone. He maintains, that perfeflion* is attainable in this life ; and to prove this point, has afferted that Mat. V. 28, ought to be tranflated thus — I'herefore ye fi^all be per^ fecty as your Father zvho is in heaven is perfe£f. He alfo fupported this do6lrine, from i of John, iii. 9. JFkofoever is born of God does not commit fin ; for his feed cibldeth in him, and he cannot fm, becaufe he is born of GoD. This fociety obferve a love-feaft once a month. They have alfo a cuftom of keeping watch nights, i. e. Tinging, praying, and laughing, from eight of the clock to tv^^elve. They have this fervice alfo once a month. As this party of Methodifts fuppofe, that the Church of England is deficient in the mod important p,oints of chrif- tian difcipline, they have formed themfelves in an indepen- dent Church, under the dire6tion of bifliops, elders, and preachers, according to the forms of ordination annexed to their Prayer Book, and the regulations which are laid down in their forms of difcipline. The Methodifts band focieties are enjoined to meet once a week, to confefs their faults to one another, and to pray fol*i each other, that they may be healed. They begin every meeting with finglng, or prayer. And, after difcourfing together • Mr. Wedey sfferts, that his idea of chriflian perfedlion docs not implv, that the faints are perfeft in knowledge, or free from ignorance and miftakes in matters, which are not effential to fal- vation. He defines chriftian perfedlion to be, the loving God, with all our minJ, foul and ftrength ; that no wrong temper re- mains in the foul ; and, that all 9ur thoughts, words, and anions are governed by pure love. M I L 143^ together concerning their fpiritual ftatc, they conclude with a prayer fuited to the ftate of each particular perfon. They are enjoined to obferve the Rriched rules of morality. All fcandal is fevercly prohibited. And they are forbid to wear any needlefs ornaments, or ufe any ncedlefs felf-indulgence. This denomination have a number of preachers difperfed through Britain, Ireland, and America, whofc profelTed dc- fign is to fpread the only true and rational religion, which is taught and prefcribedintheOldandNewTeftament. They leave every man to enjoy his own opinion, and ufe his own mode af worfliip ; defiring only, that the love of God and his neighbour be the ruling principle in his heart, and (hew* itfelf in his life, by an uniform practice of juftice, mercy, and truth. And accordingly, they give.the right hand of fel- lowfhip to every lover of God and man, whatever is his opinion and mode of worfhip ; of which he is to give an account to God alone. For an account of the extent, and prefent ftate of the Methodift focieties in Europe and America ; fee Part II.] Formey^s Ecclejtajiical Hijiory^ 'vol. 2. p. 268. Gillie^ i Succefs of the Gojpeiy 'vol. z. p. 52, Whitefeld^s Letters, 'vol. 1. p. 212, Wejley^s Ecclejtajiical Hijlory, 'vol. 4. p. 280. ■ ' -Notes On theNe^jj TeJlamenty'VoL \.p.l^.^JoL'^.p.l^6y — — — On Chrijlian Ferfeilion, p. 62, 74, Rules for the Band Societies. Dijcipline of the Methodiji Church, p. 3. MILLENARIANS. or CHILIASTS, a name given to thofe who, in the primitive ages, believed that the faints will reign on earth with Jefus Chrift a thoufand years. The former appellation is of Latin original, the latter of Greek, and both of the fame import. The Millenarians hold, that after the coming of Anti- chrift, and the dcftruftion of all nations which (liall follow, there fhall be a firft refurreflion of the juil alone. That T uU 146 MIL all who Hiall be found upon earth, both good and bad, fhail continue alive ; the good to obey the jufl, who are rifen as their princes ; the bad to be conquered by the juft, and to be fubje(^ to them. That Jefus Chrift will then defcend from heaven in his glory. That the city of Jerufalem will be rebuilt, enlarged, embellillied, and its gates fland open night and day. They applied to this new Jerufalem, what is faid in the Apoc. chap, xxi, and to the temple, all that is written in Ezek. xxxvi. Here they pretended, Jefus Chriil will fix the feat of his empire, and reign a thoufand years, with the faints, patriarchs, and prophets, who will enjoy perfedl and uninterrupted felicity. The ancientMillenarians were divided in opinion ; fome pretended, that the faints fhould pafs their time in corporeal delights. Others, that they ihould only exercife themfelves in fpiritual pleafures. The opinions of fome celebrated modern authors, con- cerning the Millenium, are as follow. Dr. Thomas Burnet and Mr. Whifton concur in aflert- ing, that the earth will not be entirely confumed ; but that the matter of which it confifts, will be fixed, purified, and refined ; which the a6\ion of fire upon it will naturally effeft. They fuppofe, that from thefe materials thus refi- ned, as from afecond chaos, there will, by the will of God^ arife a new creation ; and that the face of the earth, and likewife the atmofphere, will then be fo reftored, as to re- femble what it originally was in the paradifaical (late ; and confequcntly, to render it a more delightful abode for hu- man creatures than it is at prefent. They urge for this purpofe the following texts. 2 of Pet. iii. 13 tscverthe- UJs we, according to his promife^ look for new heavens and a neiv earthy wherein dwelleth righteoujnefs. See alfo Matt, xiii. 29, 30. Luke xvii. 29, 30. A6ls iii. 21, &c. They both fuppofe, that the earth, thus beautified and improved, fhal] be inhabited by thofe, who fliallinherit the firft M II, H7 firft rerurrc^lon, and fhall here enjoy a very eonfidcrable degree of happinefs ; though not aqual to that, which Is to^ fiicceed the general judgment ; which judgment dial 1, ac- cording to them, open, when the tiioufand years arc expired, mentioned in Rev^. . xx. 4. Though Mr. Fleming docs not entirely agree with the above mentioned fcheme, he interprets Rev. xx. 6, as re- ferring to a proper re rurre(5l ion ; of which he fuppofes that the event, which is recorded in Matt, xxvii. 32, was a pierage. He conje(5lures, that the moft celebrated faints, of the Old Teftaincnt times, then arofe, and afccnded with Chrift to heaven. Agreeable to this he apprehends, that the faints, who are to be fubje:> the commiflion of enormous fins ; and condemned all care of the body, efpecially all nicety of drcfs, and all female or- naments. He alfo gave it as his opinion, that philofophy, arts, and nliatever favoured of polite literature, fiiould be baniOicd from the chriflian church. He looked upon thofe Chrilliansas guilty of a mod hei- nous tranfgreflion, who faved their lives by flight, from the perfecuting fword, or who ranfomed them by money, from the hands of their cruel and mercenary judges. This denomination had fcparate aflemblics. They were firfl called Cataphrygians, from the place where they had their firft principal abode. They were alfo (lyled Pepuzians, becaufe Montanus lived in a Phrygian vil- lage, called Pepuza. Mofijeini's Ecchfiajlical HiPioryt 5/?/^ declares, that ///; is ccnde?nncd in the fleflj, Rom. viii. 3 : and our maniagc with it dillblved through the boHy of Chrift, the Lamb of God ; who has undergone this confiicl once for all, and inftcad of all. The Moravians aflert, thaty^//Z> confills in a joyful per- fuafion of our intcrcfl: in Chrill, and our title to his pur- chafed falvation. They deny the Calviniftic do£lrines of f articular rcdemp- tion^ and pnal tcrfeverancc. This M O R 157 This denomlnailon have eflablinied among themfelves a fort oi difc'ipUne, which clofely unites them to one another, divides them into different clajj'es^ puts them under an en- tire dependence upon their fuperiors, and confines them to certain exercifes of devotion, and to the obfcrving of differ- ent little rules. The church at Herrenhuth is fo divided, that firO: the kuf- bands, then the wives, then the widov/s, then the maids, then the young men, then the boys, then the girls, and laftly little children, are in fo many diftincl claffes. Each of which is daily vifited, the married men by a married man, the wives by a wife, and fo of the reft. Each clafs has its director chofcn by its members, and frequent particular affemblics are held in each clafs, and general ones by the whole fociety. The members of each clafs are fubdivided into people, who are dead^ aivaked, ignorant , willing difciplcs, and difci- fles who have made a progrefs. Proper affiflancc is given to each of thefe fubdivifions ; but above all, great care is ta- ken of thofe who are fpiritually dead. The Elder, the Co-elder, the Vice-elder^ fuperintcnd all the claffes. There are likewife Informers by office, fome of them known, fome kept fecret, befides many other employ- ments, and titles too tedious to enumerate. A great part of their worfliip confifls in finging : and their fongs'are always a connc6led repetition of thofe mat- ters which have been preached juft before. At all hours, whether day or night, fome perfons of both fexes are appointed by rotation to pray for the fociety. When the brethren perceive that the zeal of the fociety is declining, their devotion is revived by celebrating agapes, or love-feajis. The cafling of lots is much pradifed among them. They make ufe of it to learn the mind of the Lord. The Elders have the fole right of making matches. No promife 158 MUG promife cf marriage is of any validity without their confent. This denomination affert, that they are defcended from the ancitnt (lock of the old Bohemian and Moravian breth« ren, v^ho were a little church fixty years before the refor- mation, and fo remained withouc infringement till that time, retaining th^ir particular ecclefiaftical difcipline, and theirovvn bifnops, elders, and deacons. For an account of the extent of the Moravian Churches, [fee Part II.] R!miui''s Hijlory of the Mora